#BioGRID Interaction ID	Entrez Gene Interactor A	Entrez Gene Interactor B	BioGRID ID Interactor A	BioGRID ID Interactor B	Systematic Name Interactor A	Systematic Name Interactor B	Official Symbol Interactor A	Official Symbol Interactor B	Synonyms Interactor A	Synonyms Interactor B	Experimental System	Experimental System Type	Author	Pubmed ID	Organism Interactor A	Organism Interactor B	Throughput	Score	Modification	Phenotypes	Qualifications	Tags	Source Database
196569	2539495	2541652	276058	278148	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC24B11.06c	ptc1	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Nguyen AN (1999)	10398679	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
196570	2540719	2543289	277242	279714	SPBC216.05	SPAC9E9.08	rad3	rad26	-	-	Co-fractionation	physical	Edwards RJ (1999)	10559981	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
196571	2540719	2543289	277242	279714	SPBC216.05	SPAC9E9.08	rad3	rad26	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Edwards RJ (1999)	10559981	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
196572	2540719	2539087	277242	275659	SPBC216.05	SPCC1259.13	rad3	chk1	-	rad27	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Martinho RG (1998)	9857181	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
196573	2540719	2539087	277242	275659	SPBC216.05	SPCC1259.13	rad3	chk1	-	rad27	Biochemical Activity	physical	Martinho RG (1998)	9857181	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
196574	2540719	2538959	277242	275533	SPBC216.05	SPCC18B5.11c	rad3	cds1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Martinho RG (1998)	9857181	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
196575	2539087	2540719	275659	277242	SPCC1259.13	SPBC216.05	chk1	rad3	rad27	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Martinho RG (1998)	9857181	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
196576	2538959	2540719	275533	277242	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC216.05	cds1	rad3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Martinho RG (1998)	9857181	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
196578	2543289	2543629	279714	280043	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC3H5.06c	rad26	pol1	-	polA|swi7	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
196593	2539004	2538959	275578	275533	SPCC4G3.05c	SPCC18B5.11c	mus81	cds1	slx3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kai M (2005)	15805465	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
196594	2539004	2538959	275578	275533	SPCC4G3.05c	SPCC18B5.11c	mus81	cds1	slx3	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kai M (2005)	15805465	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
196595	2543441	2539016	279861	275589	SPAC821.12	SPCC970.04c	orb6	mob2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Hou MC (2003)	12456722	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
196596	2543441	2539016	279861	275589	SPAC821.12	SPCC970.04c	orb6	mob2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hou MC (2003)	12456722	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
196597	2543441	2539016	279861	275589	SPAC821.12	SPCC970.04c	orb6	mob2	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Hou MC (2003)	12456722	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
202018	2540149	2540398	276686	276926	SPBC1289.03c	SPBC26H8.10	spi1	dis3	-	rrp44	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Noguchi E (1996)	8896453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
202019	2541059	2540398	277574	276926	SPBC557.03c	SPBC26H8.10	pim1	dis3	dcd1|ptr2	rrp44	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Noguchi E (1996)	8896453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
206361	2541633	2539481	278129	276044	SPAC664.01c	SPCC622.16c	swi6	epe1	SPAC824.10c	kdm2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zofall M (2006)	16762840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
239568	2539036	2542783	275609	279232	SPCC1840.01c	SPAC15F9.03c	mog1	nxt2	SPCC790.04c	SPAC1B9.01c|nft2|ntf2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Oki M (2007)	17651922	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
239569	2539036	2540149	275609	276686	SPCC1840.01c	SPBC1289.03c	mog1	spi1	SPCC790.04c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Oki M (2007)	17651922	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
239570	2539036	2543204	275609	279633	SPCC1840.01c	SPAC821.04c	mog1	cid13	SPCC790.04c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Oki M (2007)	17651922	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
239928	2540234	2539834	276766	276383	SPBC336.12c	SPBC14C8.14c	cdc10	pol5	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nadeem FK (2006)	16816948	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
239929	2540234	2539834	276766	276383	SPBC336.12c	SPBC14C8.14c	cdc10	pol5	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Nadeem FK (2006)	16816948	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
241304	2541047	2540494	277562	277022	SPBC409.09c	SPBC409.04c	mis13	mis12	cnl1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Obuse C (2004)	15502821	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
241305	2539155	2540494	275727	277022	SPCC1020.02	SPBC409.04c	spc7	mis12	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Obuse C (2004)	15502821	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
246017	2540802	2541620	277321	278117	SPBC1921.02	SPAC2G11.12	rad60	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Raffa GD (2006)	16880212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246018	2540802	2543670	277321	280084	SPBC1921.02	SPAPB1E7.06c	rad60	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Raffa GD (2006)	16880212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246019	2541620	2540802	278117	277321	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC1921.02	rqh1	rad60	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Raffa GD (2006)	16880212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246020	2543390	2541738	279812	278232	SPAC631.01c	SPAC20G4.06c	acp2	adf1	-	cof1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Nakano K (2006)	16866873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246021	2541738	2543390	278232	279812	SPAC20G4.06c	SPAC631.01c	adf1	acp2	cof1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Nakano K (2006)	16866873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246022	2543390	2541738	279812	278232	SPAC631.01c	SPAC20G4.06c	acp2	adf1	-	cof1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Nakano K (2006)	16467379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246023	2541738	2543390	278232	279812	SPAC20G4.06c	SPAC631.01c	adf1	acp2	cof1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Nakano K (2006)	16467379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246024	2543390	2543526	279812	279944	SPAC631.01c	SPAC4A8.15c	acp2	cdc3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Nakano K (2006)	16866873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246025	2543390	2542805	279812	279253	SPAC631.01c	SPAC15A10.08	acp2	ain1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nakano K (2006)	16866873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology	-	-	BIOGRID
246026	2543390	2541699	279812	278195	SPAC631.01c	SPAP8A3.08	acp2	cdc4	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Nakano K (2006)	16866873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246027	2543390	2543129	279812	279561	SPAC631.01c	SPAC4F8.13c	acp2	rng2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nakano K (2006)	16866873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology	-	-	BIOGRID
246028	2539442	2541652	276005	278148	SPCC5E4.04	SPAC24B11.06c	cut1	sty1	ptr4	phh1|spc1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kawasaki Y (2006)	16861909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246029	2539442	2540329	276005	276859	SPCC5E4.04	SPBC29B5.01	cut1	atf1	ptr4	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kawasaki Y (2006)	16861909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246036	2540679	2538794	277204	275375	SPBC3D6.10	SPCC622.17	apn2	apn1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tanihigashi H (2006)	16857169	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein activity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246037	2542737	2542367	279187	278831	SPAC25B8.14	SPAC1783.03	mal2	fta2	-	sma2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kerres A (2006)	16855021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246038	2542367	2542737	278831	279187	SPAC1783.03	SPAC25B8.14	fta2	mal2	sma2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kerres A (2006)	16855021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246039	2542367	2542737	278831	279187	SPAC1783.03	SPAC25B8.14	fta2	mal2	sma2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kerres A (2006)	16855021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246040	2542367	2542304	278831	278771	SPAC1783.03	SPAC1687.20c	fta2	mis6	sma2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kerres A (2006)	16855021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246041	2542367	2540804	278831	277323	SPAC1783.03	SPBC18E5.03c	fta2	sim4	sma2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kerres A (2006)	16855021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246042	2542367	2542304	278831	278771	SPAC1783.03	SPAC1687.20c	fta2	mis6	sma2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kerres A (2006)	16855021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246043	2542367	2541321	278831	277833	SPAC1783.03	SPBP22H7.09c	fta2	mis15	sma2	pi022|SPACTOKYO_453.12	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kerres A (2006)	16855021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246044	2543193	2543059	279622	279493	SPAC3F10.11c	SPAC30.04c	abc2	abc4	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Iwaki T (2006)	16849797	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	colony color	-	-	BIOGRID
246058	2543666	2539123	280080	275695	SPAC644.06c	SPCC18B5.03	cdr1	wee1	nim1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Calonge TM (2006)	16816416	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	Wee1 deletion rescues growth defect of cdr1 mutant overexpressing Chk1	-	BIOGRID
246059	2543666	2542029	280080	278511	SPAC644.06c	SPAC8E11.02c	cdr1	rad24	nim1	anr5|sam4	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Calonge TM (2006)	16816416	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	Rad24 deletion rescues growth defect of cdr1 mutant overexpressing Chk1	-	BIOGRID
246065	2540580	2539149	277106	275721	SPBC19C2.05	SPCC1739.11c	ran1	cdc11	pat1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Krapp A (2006)	16787941	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation	-	-	BIOGRID
246066	2540580	2542761	277106	279211	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC1565.06c	ran1	spg1	pat1	sid3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Krapp A (2006)	16787941	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation	-	-	BIOGRID
246067	2540580	2542746	277106	279196	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC9G1.09	ran1	sid1	pat1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Krapp A (2006)	16787941	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation	-	-	BIOGRID
246072	2540176	2541975	276709	278460	SPBC1709.01	SPAC20G8.05c	chs2	cdc15	SPBC1734.17	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Martin-Garcia R (2006)	16772338	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246073	2540176	2541699	276709	278195	SPBC1709.01	SPAP8A3.08	chs2	cdc4	SPBC1734.17	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Martin-Garcia R (2006)	16772338	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246074	2540112	2540176	276649	276709	SPBC11C11.02	SPBC1709.01	imp2	chs2	-	SPBC1734.17	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Martin-Garcia R (2006)	16772338	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246077	2539423	2538736	275988	275320	SPCC663.12	SPCC1322.12c	cid12	bub1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Win TZ (2006)	16738311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246078	2539423	2539627	275988	276184	SPCC663.12	SPBC1734.02c	cid12	cdc27	-	SPBC337.18c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Win TZ (2006)	16738311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246080	2543281	2539087	279708	275659	SPAC23C4.18c	SPCC1259.13	rad4	chk1	cut5|dpb11|dre3	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Taricani L (2006)	16723501	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	chk1 rad4-c11 synthetic growth defect on camptothecin	-	BIOGRID
246081	2538959	2543281	275533	279708	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC23C4.18c	cds1	rad4	-	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Taricani L (2006)	16723501	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification|resistance to chemicals	cds1 rad4-c11 double mutants lack Chk1 phosphorylation and Cdc2 phosphorylation in response to hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
246085	2541620	2539004	278117	275578	SPAC2G11.12	SPCC4G3.05c	rqh1	mus81	hus2|rad12|rec9	slx3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Martin V (2006)	16710300	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246086	2541620	2541657	278117	278153	SPAC2G11.12	SPAP27G11.15	rqh1	slx1	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Martin V (2006)	16710300	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246087	2541620	2543478	278117	279898	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC688.06c	rqh1	slx4	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Martin V (2006)	16710300	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246088	2541620	3361323	278117	280399	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC30D10.04	rqh1	swi3	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Martin V (2006)	16710300	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246089	2541620	2540728	278117	277251	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC216.06c	rqh1	swi1	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Martin V (2006)	16710300	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246090	2541620	2543577	278117	279992	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC4H3.05	rqh1	srs2	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Martin V (2006)	16710300	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246092	2539523	2539658	276085	276213	SPCC622.09	SPBC1105.17	htb1	cnp1	-	sim2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Maruyama T (2006)	16688222	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246093	2539523	2542304	276085	278771	SPCC622.09	SPAC1687.20c	htb1	mis6	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Maruyama T (2006)	16688222	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246094	2539523	2540494	276085	277022	SPCC622.09	SPBC409.04c	htb1	mis12	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Maruyama T (2006)	16688222	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246095	2539523	2539505	276085	276068	SPCC622.09	SPCC736.14	htb1	dis1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Maruyama T (2006)	16688222	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246096	2539523	2541193	276085	277707	SPCC622.09	SPBC776.02c	htb1	dis2	-	bws1|sds1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Maruyama T (2006)	16688222	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246097	2539523	2540368	276085	276897	SPCC622.09	SPBC36.05c	htb1	clr6	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Maruyama T (2006)	16688222	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246098	2539523	2539781	276085	276331	SPCC622.09	SPBC106.10	htb1	pka1	-	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Maruyama T (2006)	16688222	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246100	2541975	2542162	278460	278638	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC6F6.08c	cdc15	cdc16	-	bub2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Wachtler V (2006)	16687577	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression|protein/peptide distribution	cdc15-140 cdc16-116 double mutant does not assemble actomyosin rings after hydroxyurea treatment	-	BIOGRID
246101	2541633	2542387	278129	278851	SPAC664.01c	SPAC17H9.20	swi6	psc3	SPAC824.10c	SPAC607.01	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bernard P (2006)	16682348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246102	2541633	2540557	278129	277084	SPAC664.01c	SPBC29A10.04	swi6	psm1	SPAC824.10c	smc1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bernard P (2006)	16682348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246103	2541633	2542301	278129	278768	SPAC664.01c	SPAC1687.18c	swi6	ssl3	SPAC824.10c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bernard P (2006)	16682348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246104	2541592	2542301	278089	278768	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC1687.18c	cut9	ssl3	dre1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bernard P (2006)	16682348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246105	2542301	2542657	278768	279111	SPAC1687.18c	SPAC31A2.05c	ssl3	mis4	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Bernard P (2006)	16682348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246106	2543339	2542380	279762	278844	SPAC630.13c	SPAC17G6.04c	tsc2	cpp1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nakase Y (2006)	16624901	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246107	2542380	2543143	278844	279575	SPAC17G6.04c	SPAPB1A10.04c	cpp1	cwp1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nakase Y (2006)	16624901	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	of tsc2 cpp1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
246108	2542380	2540933	278844	277449	SPAC17G6.04c	SPBC36.06c	cpp1	spo9	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nakase Y (2006)	16624901	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	of tsc2 cpp1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
246109	2542380	2539958	278844	276502	SPAC17G6.04c	SPBC1718.07c	cpp1	zfs1	-	moc4	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nakase Y (2006)	16624901	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	of tsc2 cpp1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
246110	2542380	2539873	278844	276419	SPAC17G6.04c	SPBC13G1.11	cpp1	ykt6	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nakase Y (2006)	16624901	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	of tsc2 cpp1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
246111	2542380	2540258	278844	276789	SPAC17G6.04c	SPBC32C12.02	cpp1	ste11	-	aff1|stex	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nakase Y (2006)	16624901	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	of tsc2 cpp1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
246113	2541612	2542013	278109	278496	SPAC1F7.04	SPAC20H4.11c	rho1	rho5	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Rincon SA (2006)	16524899	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246114	2540825	2542467	277343	278928	SPBC428.08c	SPAC1834.04	clr4	hht1	-	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Nishijima H (2006)	16540522	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246115	2540810	2540617	277329	277143	SPBC19C7.03	SPBC21C3.20c	cyr1	git1	git2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kao RS (2006)	16489217	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246116	2542219	2543529	278693	279947	SPAC18G6.03	SPAC4C5.02c	ypt3	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	He Y (2006)	16483310	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246117	2543529	2539873	279947	276419	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC13G1.11	ryh1	ykt6	hos1|sat7	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	He Y (2006)	16483310	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246139	2541738	2543526	278232	279944	SPAC20G4.06c	SPAC4A8.15c	adf1	cdc3	cof1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Nakano K (2006)	16467379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246140	2541738	2541699	278232	278195	SPAC20G4.06c	SPAP8A3.08	adf1	cdc4	cof1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Nakano K (2006)	16467379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246141	2541738	2539513	278232	276075	SPAC20G4.06c	SPCC645.05c	adf1	myo2	cof1	rng5	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Nakano K (2006)	16467379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246142	2541738	2542679	278232	279132	SPAC20G4.06c	SPAC12B10.07	adf1	acp1	cof1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Nakano K (2006)	16467379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246143	2541738	2540660	278232	277185	SPAC20G4.06c	SPBC21.06c	adf1	cdc7	cof1	its10|pld1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakano K (2006)	16467379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246144	2541738	2543526	278232	279944	SPAC20G4.06c	SPAC4A8.15c	adf1	cdc3	cof1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nakano K (2006)	16467379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytoskeleton morphology	-	-	BIOGRID
246145	2541738	2541699	278232	278195	SPAC20G4.06c	SPAP8A3.08	adf1	cdc4	cof1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nakano K (2006)	16467379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytoskeleton morphology	-	-	BIOGRID
246147	2539808	2540589	276358	277115	SPBC17D11.01	SPBC20F10.06	nep1	mad2	SPBC20F10.11	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Zhou L (2005)	15769255	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246150	2540574	2543685	277101	280099	SPBC409.03	SPAC3C7.03c	swi5	rad55	-	rhp55	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ellermeier C (2004)	15466419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246151	2539487	3361511	276050	280587	SPCC895.05	SPAC23C4.08	for3	rho3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakano K (2002)	12415007	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246152	2543170	2543682	279601	280096	SPAC343.09	SPAC637.10c	ubx3	rpn10	mug39	pus1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hartmann-Petersen R (2004)	15120077	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246153	2539659	2540100	276214	276638	SPBC146.13c	SPBC13E7.09	myo1	vrp1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sirotkin V (2005)	16087707	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246155	2541652	2543239	278148	279667	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC977.10	sty1	sod2	phh1|spc1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wang LY (2005)	15870269	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	overexpression of Sod2 rescues Spc1 cells from cation toxicity	-	BIOGRID
246156	2542162	2541936	278638	278423	SPAC6F6.08c	SPAC222.10c	cdc16	byr4	bub2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Furge KA (1998)	9742395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246158	2541861	2543222	278351	279650	SPAC5D6.08c	SPAC821.08c	mes1	slp1	-	cdc20	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Izawa D (2005)	15791259	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of slp1 rescues cdc13 loss and growth (data not shown) in a mes1 mutant background	-	BIOGRID
246159	3361384	2538736	280460	275320	SPAC12G12.13c	SPCC1322.12c	cid14	bub1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Win TZ (2006)	16478992	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246160	2539436	2543580	275999	279995	SPCC645.04	SPAC644.14c	nse3	rad51	-	rhp51	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Pebernard S (2004)	15331764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246161	2539436	2541071	275999	277586	SPCC645.04	SPBC582.05c	nse3	brc1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Pebernard S (2004)	15331764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246162	2543339	2540853	279762	277370	SPAC630.13c	SPBC428.16c	tsc2	rhb1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	van Slegtenhorst M (2004)	14718525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient uptake:wild type	Dominant negative Rhb1 can rescue the arginine uptake in tsc2 mutants	-	BIOGRID
246163	2541059	2540149	277574	276686	SPBC557.03c	SPBC1289.03c	pim1	spi1	dcd1|ptr2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Sazer S (1994)	8313905	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246164	2540032	2540541	276575	277068	SPBC1703.14c	SPBC1A4.03c	top1	top2	-	ptr11	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Uemura T (1984)	6090122	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression	-	-	BIOGRID
246166	2542312	2541071	278778	277586	SPAC16A10.06c	SPBC582.05c	nse2	brc1	pli2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Pebernard S (2004)	15331764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246167	2543116	2542696	279548	279149	SPAC3A11.08	SPAC29B12.03	pcu4	spd1	Cul-4|cul4	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Holmberg C (2005)	15805471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:wild type|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:wild type	Methyl methanesulfonate (CHEBI:25255 and PubChem CID: 4156)	-	BIOGRID
246169	2542231	2541101	278704	277616	SPAC19G12.14	SPBC609.02	its3	ptn1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Mitra P (2004)	15249580	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chemical compound accumulation	PI(4,5)P2, PI(3,4)P2 and PI(3,4,5)P3 levels were decreased in its3-1/ptn1-delta cells compared with ptn1-delta cells	-	BIOGRID
246171	2539765	2542679	276316	279132	SPBC1778.06c	SPAC12B10.07	fim1	acp1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakano K (2001)	11694585	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246172	2540760	2542285	277280	278753	SPBC21.05c	SPAC17H9.09c	ral2	ras1	-	ste5	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Fukui Y (1989)	2586528	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell wall morphology:wild type|mating efficiency:wild type	Multiple copies of ras1 or expression of an activated ras1 partially restored the mating activity and cell morphology in a ral2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
246173	2540804	2539658	277323	276213	SPBC18E5.03c	SPBC1105.17	sim4	cnp1	-	sim2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246175	2542582	2540348	279037	276877	SPAC19G12.02c	SPBC29A10.05	pms1	exo1	-	mut2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rudolph C (1998)	9871115	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency	-	-	BIOGRID
246176	2541936	2542761	278423	279211	SPAC222.10c	SPAC1565.06c	byr4	spg1	-	sid3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Furge KA (1998)	9742395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246177	3361330	2543164	280406	279595	SPBC20F10.04c	SPAC3G6.06c	nse4	rad2	rad62	fen1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Morikawa H (2004)	15485909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246178	2542184	2539641	278659	276196	SPAC17C9.13c	SPBC14C8.01c	cut8	cut2	-	SPBC1815.02c	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Tatebe H (2000)	11084332	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246179	2543577	2539004	279992	275578	SPAC4H3.05	SPCC4G3.05c	srs2	mus81	-	slx3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Doe CL (2004)	14993467	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246183	2542807	2543483	279255	279903	SPAC15E1.09	SPAPB2B4.02	grx2	grx5	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chung WH (2005)	15796926	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246184	2542914	2542707	279356	279160	SPAC57A10.05c	SPAC25G10.03	pof1	zip1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Harrison C (2005)	15660136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246185	2540118	2543481	276655	279901	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAPB2B4.03	rem1	cig2	-	cyc17	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Malapeira J (2005)	16024772	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246188	2543164	2542083	279595	278560	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC27E2.05	rad2	cdc1	fen1	mis1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kang HY (2000)	10880469	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246189	2543058	2543040	279492	279475	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC31G5.13	rpn15	rpn11	dss1|sem1	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Josse L (2006)	16149916	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246190	2543058	2540025	279492	276569	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC16G5.01	rpn15	rpn12	dss1|sem1	SPBC342.07|mts3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Josse L (2006)	16149916	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246193	2541633	2539447	278129	276010	SPAC664.01c	SPCC338.17c	swi6	rad21	SPAC824.10c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bernard P (2001)	11598266	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246194	2540511	2539640	277039	276195	SPBC1718.01	SPBC32F12.09	pop1	rum1	SPBC2G2.18|ste16	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Maekawa H (1998)	9472077	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance|resistance to chemicals	deletion of rum1 rescues nitrogen sensitivity and ploidy defects in a pop1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
246196	2539550	2541071	276111	277586	SPCC550.05	SPBC582.05c	nse1	brc1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Pebernard S (2004)	15331764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246198	3361306	2543164	280382	279595	SPBC6B1.09c	SPAC3G6.06c	nbs1	rad2	slr10	fen1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ueno M (2003)	12944481	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246199	2540148	2542313	276685	278779	SPBC16D10.04c	SPAC16A10.07c	dna2	taz1	-	myb|myb1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tomita K (2004)	15485922	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	double mutants show defects in generation of the G-rich overhang	-	BIOGRID
246200	2539387	2542632	275952	279086	SPCC1840.03	SPAC24H6.05	sal3	cdc25	pse1	sal2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Chua G (2002)	12399381	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246201	2542285	2543190	278753	279619	SPAC17H9.09c	SPAC31F12.01	ras1	zds1	ste5	SPAC637.14|mug88	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yakura M (2006)	16322512	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246202	2542537	2543445	278994	279865	SPAC19D5.04	SPAC4F10.13c	ptr1	mpd2	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Andoh T (2004)	15094387	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246204	2543589	2539963	280004	276507	SPAC4F10.15c	SPBC17F3.02	wsp1	nak1	-	mor4|orb3	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Huang TY (2005)	15615784	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246207	2539869	2542696	276415	279149	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC29B12.03	cdc2	spd1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Woollard A (1996)	8887552	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246208	2542732	2543360	279182	279782	SPAC25G10.07c	SPAC664.10	cut7	klp2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Troxell CL (2001)	11694582	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246211	2542184	2539208	278659	275778	SPAC17C9.13c	SPCC1450.11c	cut8	cek1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Samejima I (1994)	8065367	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246212	2540494	2539511	277022	276073	SPBC409.04c	SPCC663.01c	mis12	ekc1	-	SPCC777.16c|eck1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Goshima G (2003)	12773390	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246213	2541603	2543390	278100	279812	SPAC1F5.04c	SPAC631.01c	cdc12	acp2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kovar DR (2005)	15743909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Deletion of acp2 partly suppresses cytokinesis defects in temperature-sensitive cdc12-112 cells	-	BIOGRID
246214	2541603	2543390	278100	279812	SPAC1F5.04c	SPAC631.01c	cdc12	acp2	-	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Kovar DR (2005)	15743909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246215	2542285	2541936	278753	278423	SPAC17H9.09c	SPAC222.10c	ras1	byr4	ste5	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Song K (1996)	8682866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246216	2542285	2540440	278753	276968	SPAC17H9.09c	SPBC646.12c	ras1	gap1	ste5	sar1|src1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Wang Y (1991)	1883874	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246217	2543526	2540002	279944	276546	SPAC4A8.15c	SPBC14C8.06	cdc3	arc1	-	sop2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Balasubramanian MK (1996)	8978670	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246218	2539505	2539847	276068	276395	SPCC736.14	SPBC530.14c	dis1	dsk1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Takeuchi M (1993)	8485317	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246219	2540810	2541117	277329	277632	SPBC19C7.03	SPBC646.13	cyr1	sds23	git2	moc1|psp1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Goldar MM (2005)	16273369	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sexual cycle:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246221	2540580	2543351	277106	279773	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC8C9.03	ran1	cgs1	pat1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	DeVoti J (1991)	1657594	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246222	2542757	2541688	279207	278184	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC25G10.04c	mre11	rec10	rad32	rec20	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ellermeier C (2005)	16043696	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246223	2542150	2539550	278626	276111	SPAC17A5.11	SPCC550.05	rec12	nse1	spo11	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Pebernard S (2004)	15331764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:undetermined	text only	-	BIOGRID
246224	2539437	2541149	276000	277664	SPCC645.06c	SPBC651.03c	rgf3	gyp10	lad1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Morrell-Falvey JL (2005)	16291723	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell death:wild type	SPBC651.03c and rho1 overexpression rescue the lysis defect seen in a lad1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
246226	2543351	2540070	279773	276608	SPAC8C9.03	SPBC119.04	cgs1	mei3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Peng Z (2003)	12664134	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis	double mutants undergo meiotic catastrophe	-	BIOGRID
246227	2539083	2541941	275655	278428	SPCC1020.04c	SPAC20H4.03c	rpb6	tfs1	rpo15	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ishiguro A (2000)	10648612	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of TFIIS rescues the temperature sensitivity and 6-AU (CID 68037 CHEBI 53745) sensitivity of an rpb6 mutant	-	BIOGRID
246228	2540032	2540541	276575	277068	SPBC1703.14c	SPBC1A4.03c	top1	top2	-	ptr11	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yamagishi M (1988)	2839305	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation|heat sensitivity	double mutants show a large preferential reduction of rRNA synthesis at high temperatures	-	BIOGRID
246229	2539642	2539487	276197	276050	SPBC1706.01	SPCC895.05	tea4	for3	wsh3	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Martin SG (2005)	15809031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology:partial rescue|cell shape:partial rescue	tea1p-for3p fusion restores bipolar growth in tea4 mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
246235	2542615	2539149	279069	275721	SPAC19G12.01c	SPCC1739.11c	cut20	cdc11	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chang L (2001)	11533255	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246236	2542438	2540880	278900	277397	SPAC17C9.01c	SPBC582.03	nuc2	cdc13	SPAC1851.01|apc3	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chang L (2001)	11533255	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246238	2540013	2540847	276557	277364	SPBC14C8.07c	SPBC428.18	cdc18	cdt1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yanow SK (2001)	11532929	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression	-	-	BIOGRID
246239	2542632	2539123	279086	275695	SPAC24H6.05	SPCC18B5.03	cdc25	wee1	sal2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Elder RT (2001)	11531413	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression	-	-	BIOGRID
246247	2542266	2540620	278735	277146	SPAC17D4.02	SPBC4.04c	cdc45	mcm2	goa1|sna41	cdc19|nda1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Uchiyama M (2001)	11523776	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246248	2542266	2541695	278735	278191	SPAC17D4.02	SPAC1F7.05	cdc45	cdc22	goa1|sna41	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Uchiyama M (2001)	11523776	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246249	2542266	2543281	278735	279708	SPAC17D4.02	SPAC23C4.18c	cdc45	rad4	goa1|sna41	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Uchiyama M (2001)	11523776	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246250	2542266	2539164	278735	275735	SPAC17D4.02	SPCC16A11.17	cdc45	mcm4	goa1|sna41	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Uchiyama M (2001)	11523776	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246251	2542266	2540719	278735	277242	SPAC17D4.02	SPBC216.05	cdc45	rad3	goa1|sna41	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Uchiyama M (2001)	11523776	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246252	2541936	2539379	278423	275945	SPAC222.10c	SPCC188.02	byr4	par1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jiang W (2001)	11514436	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	in par1 par2 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
246253	2541936	2542891	278423	279335	SPAC222.10c	SPAC6F12.12	byr4	par2	-	pbp2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jiang W (2001)	11514436	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	in par1 par2 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
246254	2542761	2539379	279211	275945	SPAC1565.06c	SPCC188.02	spg1	par1	sid3	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jiang W (2001)	11514436	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246255	2540234	2540885	276766	277402	SPBC336.12c	SPBC660.14	cdc10	mik1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ng SS (2001)	11513869	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246256	2539869	2540234	276415	276766	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC336.12c	cdc2	cdc10	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ng SS (2001)	11513869	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology	-	-	BIOGRID
246257	3361476	2540582	280552	277108	SPAC16A10.04	SPBC26H8.07c	rho4	nda3	-	alp12|ben1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakano K (2003)	12653963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246258	2541592	2539442	278089	276005	SPAC6F12.15c	SPCC5E4.04	cut9	cut1	dre1	ptr4	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Matsumura T (2003)	12653962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246259	2541592	2539641	278089	276196	SPAC6F12.15c	SPBC14C8.01c	cut9	cut2	dre1	SPBC1815.02c	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Matsumura T (2003)	12653962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246260	2539641	2539639	276196	276194	SPBC14C8.01c	SPBC106.09	cut2	cut4	SPBC1815.02c	apc1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Matsumura T (2003)	12653962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246261	2539641	2541592	276196	278089	SPBC14C8.01c	SPAC6F12.15c	cut2	cut9	SPBC1815.02c	dre1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Matsumura T (2003)	12653962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246262	2539641	2542438	276196	278900	SPBC14C8.01c	SPAC17C9.01c	cut2	nuc2	SPBC1815.02c	SPAC1851.01|apc3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Matsumura T (2003)	12653962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246263	2542880	2539442	279325	276005	SPAC6F12.14	SPCC5E4.04	cut23	cut1	apc8	ptr4	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Matsumura T (2003)	12653962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246264	2542880	2539641	279325	276196	SPAC6F12.14	SPBC14C8.01c	cut23	cut2	apc8	SPBC1815.02c	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Matsumura T (2003)	12653962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246265	2540307	2539442	276837	276005	SPBC1A4.01	SPCC5E4.04	apc10	cut1	SPBC1E8.06	ptr4	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Matsumura T (2003)	12653962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246266	2540307	2539641	276837	276196	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC14C8.01c	apc10	cut2	SPBC1E8.06	SPBC1815.02c	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Matsumura T (2003)	12653962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246267	2542615	2539442	279069	276005	SPAC19G12.01c	SPCC5E4.04	cut20	cut1	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	ptr4	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Matsumura T (2003)	12653962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246268	2542615	2539641	279069	276196	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBC14C8.01c	cut20	cut2	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	SPBC1815.02c	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Matsumura T (2003)	12653962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246269	2542184	2539442	278659	276005	SPAC17C9.13c	SPCC5E4.04	cut8	cut1	-	ptr4	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Matsumura T (2003)	12653962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246270	2542184	2539641	278659	276196	SPAC17C9.13c	SPBC14C8.01c	cut8	cut2	-	SPBC1815.02c	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Matsumura T (2003)	12653962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246271	2543222	2539442	279650	276005	SPAC821.08c	SPCC5E4.04	slp1	cut1	cdc20	ptr4	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Matsumura T (2003)	12653962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246272	2543222	2539641	279650	276196	SPAC821.08c	SPBC14C8.01c	slp1	cut2	cdc20	SPBC1815.02c	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Matsumura T (2003)	12653962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246273	2539442	2542438	276005	278900	SPCC5E4.04	SPAC17C9.01c	cut1	nuc2	ptr4	SPAC1851.01|apc3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Matsumura T (2003)	12653962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246274	2539442	2539639	276005	276194	SPCC5E4.04	SPBC106.09	cut1	cut4	ptr4	apc1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Matsumura T (2003)	12653962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246275	2539442	2541592	276005	278089	SPCC5E4.04	SPAC6F12.15c	cut1	cut9	ptr4	dre1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Matsumura T (2003)	12653962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246276	2541592	2542029	278089	278511	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC8E11.02c	cut9	rad24	dre1	anr5|sam4	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Matsumura T (2003)	12653962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246277	2541592	2542252	278089	278722	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC17A2.13c	cut9	rad25	dre1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Matsumura T (2003)	12653962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246278	2543441	2540099	279861	276637	SPAC821.12	SPBC16H5.11c	orb6	skb1	-	rmt5	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Wiley DJ (2003)	12646585	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	-	-	BIOGRID
246279	2540024	2540019	276568	276563	SPBP4H10.04	SPBC1685.01	ppb1	pmp1	SPBC1346.01c	dsp1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Hirayama S (2003)	12637524	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionic stress resistance:wild type	growth on MgCl2	-	BIOGRID
246280	2542313	2540719	278779	277242	SPAC16A10.07c	SPBC216.05	taz1	rad3	myb|myb1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Miller KM (2003)	12620220	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246281	2542313	2538736	278779	275320	SPAC16A10.07c	SPCC1322.12c	taz1	bub1	myb|myb1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Miller KM (2003)	12620220	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246282	2542313	2543086	278779	279519	SPAC16A10.07c	SPAC30D11.10	taz1	rad52	myb|myb1	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Miller KM (2003)	12620220	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246283	2542313	2538959	278779	275533	SPAC16A10.07c	SPCC18B5.11c	taz1	cds1	myb|myb1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Miller KM (2003)	12620220	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
246284	2542313	2540541	278779	277068	SPAC16A10.07c	SPBC1A4.03c	taz1	top2	myb|myb1	ptr11	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Miller KM (2003)	12620220	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246285	2540695	2540887	277219	277404	SPBC19G7.01c	SPBC4F6.15c	msh2	swi10	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	rad23	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kunz C (2003)	12617726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency	-	-	BIOGRID
246286	2540695	2543595	277219	280010	SPBC19G7.01c	SPAC4G9.11c	msh2	cmb1	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kunz C (2003)	12617726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency	-	-	BIOGRID
246287	2543595	2540887	280010	277404	SPAC4G9.11c	SPBC4F6.15c	cmb1	swi10	-	rad23	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kunz C (2003)	12617726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency	-	-	BIOGRID
246288	2541268	2540481	277782	277009	SPBP19A11.03c	SPBC2D10.12	mts4	rhp23	rpn1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Seeger M (2003)	12615927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246289	2540589	2538736	277115	275320	SPBC20F10.06	SPCC1322.12c	mad2	bub1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yamaguchi S (2003)	12606573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246290	2541059	2540149	277574	276686	SPBC557.03c	SPBC1289.03c	pim1	spi1	dcd1|ptr2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Matsumoto T (1991)	1855255	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:wild type|viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246291	2540458	2539447	276986	276010	SPBC29A10.14	SPCC338.17c	rec8	rad21	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yokobayashi S (2003)	12748297	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis	-	-	BIOGRID
246292	2540580	2540458	277106	276986	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC29A10.14	ran1	rec8	pat1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yamamoto A (2003)	12727894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation	-	-	BIOGRID
246293	2540580	2542150	277106	278626	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC17A5.11	ran1	rec12	pat1	spo11	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yamamoto A (2003)	12727894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation	-	-	BIOGRID
246296	2539881	2543580	276427	279995	SPBC16G5.12c	SPAC644.14c	top3	rad51	-	rhp51	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Laursen LV (2003)	12724426	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246297	2539881	2542749	276427	279199	SPBC16G5.12c	SPAC15A10.03c	top3	rad54	-	rhp54	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Laursen LV (2003)	12724426	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246298	2539881	2543685	276427	280099	SPBC16G5.12c	SPAC3C7.03c	top3	rad55	-	rhp55	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Laursen LV (2003)	12724426	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246299	2539881	2543086	276427	279519	SPBC16G5.12c	SPAC30D11.10	top3	rad52	-	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Laursen LV (2003)	12724426	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246300	2540810	2541701	277329	278197	SPBC19C7.03	SPAC1296.03c	cyr1	sxa2	git2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Imai Y (1994)	8314086	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	arrested growth in response to P-factor	-	BIOGRID
246301	2539881	2541620	276427	278117	SPBC16G5.12c	SPAC2G11.12	top3	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Maftahi M (1999)	10572171	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246302	2541620	2539881	278117	276427	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC16G5.12c	rqh1	top3	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Maftahi M (1999)	10572171	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246303	2542299	2543402	278766	279824	SPAC18B11.10	SPAC630.14c	tup11	tup12	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Mukai Y (1999)	10567571	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	increased transcription of fbp1	-	BIOGRID
246305	2541599	2540737	278096	277260	SPAC24B11.11c	SPBC19G7.05c	sid2	bgs1	-	cps1|drc1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Liu J (1999)	10545452	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246306	2539312	2543413	275879	279835	SPCC777.14	SPAC4F8.12c	prp4	spp42	-	cwf6	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Schmidt H (1999)	10545451	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA modification:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246307	2542615	2543351	279069	279773	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC8C9.03	cut20	cgs1	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yamashita YM (1999)	10526233	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246308	2542615	2539207	279069	275777	SPAC19G12.01c	SPCC285.09c	cut20	cgs2	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	pde1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yamashita YM (1999)	10526233	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246309	2540329	2540363	276859	276892	SPBC29B5.01	SPBC2F12.09c	atf1	atf21	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ohmiya R (1999)	10102365	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	osmotic stress resistance	calcium sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
246310	2540329	2541860	276859	278350	SPBC29B5.01	SPAC22F3.02	atf1	atf31	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ohmiya R (1999)	10102365	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	osmotic stress resistance	calcium sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
246311	2540329	2542047	276859	278528	SPBC29B5.01	SPAC21E11.03c	atf1	pcr1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	mts2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ohmiya R (1999)	10102365	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	osmotic stress resistance	calcium sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
246312	2540329	2542707	276859	279160	SPBC29B5.01	SPAC25G10.03	atf1	zip1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ohmiya R (1999)	10102365	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	osmotic stress resistance	calcium sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
246313	2539869	2543539	276415	279956	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC926.04c	cdc2	hsp90	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	git10|swo1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Munoz MJ (1999)	10102358	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in G2 phase	-	-	BIOGRID
246314	2543048	2543239	279483	279667	SPAC3F10.02c	SPAC977.10	trk1	sod2	sptrk	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Balcells L (1999)	10091581	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionic stress resistance	-	-	BIOGRID
246315	2543048	2542255	279483	278725	SPAC3F10.02c	SPAC57A7.08	trk1	pzh1	sptrk	phz1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Balcells L (1999)	10091581	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionic stress resistance:undetermined|resistance to chemicals:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246316	2542582	2540887	279037	277404	SPAC19G12.02c	SPBC4F6.15c	pms1	swi10	-	rad23	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Fleck O (1999)	10080187	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency	-	-	BIOGRID
246317	2542582	2541120	279037	277635	SPAC19G12.02c	SPBC649.03	pms1	rhp14	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Fleck O (1999)	10080187	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency	-	-	BIOGRID
246318	2540234	2540582	276766	277108	SPBC336.12c	SPBC26H8.07c	cdc10	nda3	-	alp12|ben1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sawin KE (1998)	9679144	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology	increased branching	-	BIOGRID
246320	2539997	2541468	276541	277970	SPBC1604.14c	SPAC1F5.09c	shk1	shk2	orb2|pak1	pak2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Sells MA (1998)	9660818	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246321	2539997	2541468	276541	277970	SPBC1604.14c	SPAC1F5.09c	shk1	shk2	orb2|pak1	pak2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yang P (1998)	9660817	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology:wild type|viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246327	2540025	2543682	276569	280096	SPBC16G5.01	SPAC637.10c	rpn12	rpn10	SPBC342.07|mts3	pus1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wilkinson CR (2000)	10809753	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246328	2540719	2538959	277242	275533	SPBC216.05	SPCC18B5.11c	rad3	cds1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Martinho RG (1998)	9857181	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246329	2543682	2540329	280096	276859	SPAC637.10c	SPBC29B5.01	rpn10	atf1	pus1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Wilkinson CR (2000)	10809753	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246330	2543682	2543040	280096	279475	SPAC637.10c	SPAC31G5.13	rpn10	rpn11	pus1	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Wilkinson CR (2000)	10809753	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246331	2543682	2541268	280096	277782	SPAC637.10c	SPBP19A11.03c	rpn10	mts4	pus1	rpn1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Wilkinson CR (2000)	10809753	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246332	2543298	2540580	279723	277106	SPAC6B12.15	SPBC19C2.05	cpc2	ran1	rkp1	pat1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	McLeod M (2000)	10805744	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation efficiency:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246333	2543327	2540471	279750	276999	SPAC1D4.06c	SPBC19F8.07	csk1	mcs6	-	cdk7|crk1|mop1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hermand D (1998)	9857180	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246334	2540471	2543327	276999	279750	SPBC19F8.07	SPAC1D4.06c	mcs6	csk1	cdk7|crk1|mop1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hermand D (1998)	9857180	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246335	2543327	2540471	279750	276999	SPAC1D4.06c	SPBC19F8.07	csk1	mcs6	-	cdk7|crk1|mop1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hermand D (2001)	11226158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246336	2540471	2543327	276999	279750	SPBC19F8.07	SPAC1D4.06c	mcs6	csk1	cdk7|crk1|mop1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hermand D (2001)	11226158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246338	2541957	2541889	278444	278379	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC2F7.03c	plo1	pom1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Baehler J (1998)	9852154	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246339	2542632	2540099	279086	276637	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC16H5.11c	cdc25	skb1	sal2	rmt5	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Gilbreth M (1998)	9843966	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246341	2542632	2540099	279086	276637	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC16H5.11c	cdc25	skb1	sal2	rmt5	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Gilbreth M (1998)	9843966	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246343	2539123	2539997	275695	276541	SPCC18B5.03	SPBC1604.14c	wee1	shk1	-	orb2|pak1	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Gilbreth M (1998)	9843966	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246344	2539123	2540099	275695	276637	SPCC18B5.03	SPBC16H5.11c	wee1	skb1	-	rmt5	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Gilbreth M (1998)	9843966	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246345	2542029	2542080	278511	278557	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC27D7.03c	rad24	mei2	anr5|sam4	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tanaka Y (2000)	10788621	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246346	2539666	2540589	276221	277115	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC20F10.06	eso1	mad2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tanaka K (2000)	10779336	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246347	2539666	2542657	276221	279111	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC31A2.05c	eso1	mis4	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tanaka K (2000)	10779336	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246348	2539666	2539447	276221	276010	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC338.17c	eso1	rad21	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tanaka K (2000)	10779336	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246349	2539666	2540433	276221	276961	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC2D10.06	eso1	rep1	-	rec16	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tanaka K (2000)	10779336	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246350	2539666	2541871	276221	278361	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC22F3.09c	eso1	res2	-	mcs1|pct1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tanaka K (2000)	10779336	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246351	2539666	2540234	276221	276766	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC336.12c	eso1	cdc10	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tanaka K (2000)	10779336	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246352	2539666	2543481	276221	279901	SPBC16A3.11	SPAPB2B4.03	eso1	cig2	-	cyc17	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tanaka K (2000)	10779336	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246353	2539666	2540627	276221	277153	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC25H2.13c	eso1	cdc20	-	pol2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tanaka K (2000)	10779336	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246354	2539666	2540020	276221	276564	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC16D10.09	eso1	pcn1	-	pcn	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tanaka K (2000)	10779336	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246355	2539513	2543576	276075	279991	SPCC645.05c	SPAC4A8.05c	myo2	myp2	rng5	myo3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Motegi F (2000)	10769212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246356	2541699	2539513	278195	276075	SPAP8A3.08	SPCC645.05c	cdc4	myo2	-	rng5	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Motegi F (2000)	10769212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246357	2541936	2540845	278423	277362	SPAC222.10c	SPBC428.13c	byr4	mob1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Salimova E (2000)	10769201	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth:wild type|viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246358	2542162	2540845	278638	277362	SPAC6F6.08c	SPBC428.13c	cdc16	mob1	bub2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Salimova E (2000)	10769201	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth:wild type|viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246359	2542761	2540845	279211	277362	SPAC1565.06c	SPBC428.13c	spg1	mob1	sid3	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Salimova E (2000)	10769201	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246360	2540013	2540847	276557	277364	SPBC14C8.07c	SPBC428.18	cdc18	cdt1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nishitani H (2000)	10766248	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	Cdt1 enhances the ability of Cdc18 to induce continuing DNA synthesis.	-	BIOGRID
246361	2541590	2540880	278087	277397	SPAC57A10.02	SPBC582.03	cdr2	cdc13	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Breeding CS (1998)	9843577	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246362	2541590	2539869	278087	276415	SPAC57A10.02	SPBC11B10.09	cdr2	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Breeding CS (1998)	9843577	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246363	2542231	2540024	278704	276568	SPAC19G12.14	SPBP4H10.04	its3	ppb1	-	SPBC1346.01c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Zhang Y (2000)	10950958	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246364	2541590	2542632	278087	279086	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC24H6.05	cdr2	cdc25	-	sal2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Breeding CS (1998)	9843577	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246365	2540544	2538959	277071	275533	SPBC25B2.05	SPCC18B5.11c	mis3	cds1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kondoh H (2000)	10947840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246366	2539123	2540885	275695	277402	SPCC18B5.03	SPBC660.14	wee1	mik1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kondoh H (2000)	10947840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	-	-	BIOGRID
246367	2539123	2540544	275695	277071	SPCC18B5.03	SPBC25B2.05	wee1	mis3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kondoh H (2000)	10947840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	-	-	BIOGRID
246368	2540544	2540880	277071	277397	SPBC25B2.05	SPBC582.03	mis3	cdc13	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kondoh H (2000)	10947840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246369	2540544	2542632	277071	279086	SPBC25B2.05	SPAC24H6.05	mis3	cdc25	-	sal2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kondoh H (2000)	10947840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246370	2540544	2541193	277071	277707	SPBC25B2.05	SPBC776.02c	mis3	dis2	-	bws1|sds1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kondoh H (2000)	10947840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246371	2542632	2541178	279086	277692	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC725.02	cdc25	mpr1	sal2	spy1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Aoyama K (2000)	10940030	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:partial rescue|heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246372	2542632	2543666	279086	280080	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC644.06c	cdc25	cdr1	sal2	nim1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kanoh J (1998)	9843572	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246373	2542632	2541055	279086	277570	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC409.07c	cdc25	wis1	sal2	smf2|spc2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kanoh J (1998)	9843572	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246374	2542632	2541590	279086	278087	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC57A10.02	cdc25	cdr2	sal2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kanoh J (1998)	9843572	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246375	2541590	2542632	278087	279086	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC24H6.05	cdr2	cdc25	-	sal2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kanoh J (1998)	9843572	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246376	2541590	2542632	278087	279086	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC24H6.05	cdr2	cdc25	-	sal2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kanoh J (1998)	9843572	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:wild type	overexpression of cdc25 rescues the cell elongation phenotype of a cdr2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
246380	2540660	2542761	277185	279211	SPBC21.06c	SPAC1565.06c	cdc7	spg1	its10|pld1	sid3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cullen CF (2000)	10924454	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246382	2540660	2540528	277185	277056	SPBC21.06c	SPBC18H10.04c	cdc7	sce3	its10|pld1	tif48	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cullen CF (2000)	10924454	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246384	2540660	2541612	277185	278109	SPBC21.06c	SPAC1F7.04	cdc7	rho1	its10|pld1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cullen CF (2000)	10924454	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246386	2540660	2541940	277185	278427	SPBC21.06c	SPAC27F1.02c	cdc7	cdc8	its10|pld1	fus4	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cullen CF (2000)	10924454	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246396	2543514	2539640	279932	276195	SPAC4D7.03	SPBC32F12.09	pop2	rum1	sud1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Jallepalli PV (1998)	9653157	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246397	2540660	2541599	277185	278096	SPBC21.06c	SPAC24B11.11c	cdc7	sid2	its10|pld1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Balasubramanian MK (1998)	9649519	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246398	2540660	2542761	277185	279211	SPBC21.06c	SPAC1565.06c	cdc7	spg1	its10|pld1	sid3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Balasubramanian MK (1998)	9649519	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246399	2539149	2542761	275721	279211	SPCC1739.11c	SPAC1565.06c	cdc11	spg1	-	sid3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Balasubramanian MK (1998)	9649519	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246400	2540624	2541599	277150	278096	SPBC24C6.07	SPAC24B11.11c	cdc14	sid2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Balasubramanian MK (1998)	9649519	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246401	2540624	2542761	277150	279211	SPBC24C6.07	SPAC1565.06c	cdc14	spg1	-	sid3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Balasubramanian MK (1998)	9649519	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246402	2540650	2542761	277175	279211	SPBC244.01c	SPAC1565.06c	sid4	spg1	-	sid3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Balasubramanian MK (1998)	9649519	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246403	2540650	2541599	277175	278096	SPBC244.01c	SPAC24B11.11c	sid4	sid2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Balasubramanian MK (1998)	9649519	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246404	2539442	2542438	276005	278900	SPCC5E4.04	SPAC17C9.01c	cut1	nuc2	ptr4	SPAC1851.01|apc3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Grishchuk EL (1998)	9649518	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246405	2543407	2540148	279829	276685	SPAC8F11.07c	SPBC16D10.04c	cdc24	dna2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Gould KL (1998)	9649516	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246406	2541936	2542162	278423	278638	SPAC222.10c	SPAC6F6.08c	byr4	cdc16	-	bub2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Jwa M (1998)	9638658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246407	2542162	2541936	278638	278423	SPAC6F6.08c	SPAC222.10c	cdc16	byr4	bub2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Jwa M (1998)	9638658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246408	2541936	2540660	278423	277185	SPAC222.10c	SPBC21.06c	byr4	cdc7	-	its10|pld1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Jwa M (1998)	9638658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246409	2542162	2540660	278638	277185	SPAC6F6.08c	SPBC21.06c	cdc16	cdc7	bub2	its10|pld1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Jwa M (1998)	9638658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246410	2539997	2543441	276541	279861	SPBC1604.14c	SPAC821.12	shk1	orb6	orb2|pak1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Verde F (1998)	9636183	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246412	2542632	2541141	279086	277656	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC649.05	cdc25	cut12	sal2	stf1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	MacIver FH (2003)	12815070	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|temperature sensitive growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246414	2538959	2539087	275533	275659	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC1259.13	cds1	chk1	-	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Lambert S (2003)	12808110	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246415	2542967	2539465	279407	276028	SPAC12B10.12c	SPCC4G3.10c	rhp41	rhp42	rhp4a	rhp4b	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Marti TM (2003)	12807767	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	double mutants show increased sensitivity to UV	-	BIOGRID
246416	2542967	2539465	279407	276028	SPAC12B10.12c	SPCC4G3.10c	rhp41	rhp42	rhp4a	rhp4b	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Marti TM (2003)	12807767	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to UV	-	BIOGRID
246417	2542967	2539473	279407	276036	SPAC12B10.12c	SPCP25A2.02c	rhp41	rhp26	rhp4a	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Marti TM (2003)	12807767	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to UV	-	BIOGRID
246418	2540695	2542967	277219	279407	SPBC19G7.01c	SPAC12B10.12c	msh2	rhp41	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	rhp4a	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Marti TM (2003)	12807767	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency	double mutants show increased mitotic mutation rates	-	BIOGRID
246419	2540695	2539465	277219	276028	SPBC19G7.01c	SPCC4G3.10c	msh2	rhp42	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	rhp4b	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Marti TM (2003)	12807767	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency:partial rescue	mutation of rhp42 decreases mutation rates in an msh2 mutant background	-	BIOGRID
246420	2540887	2543358	277404	279780	SPBC4F6.15c	SPAC688.10	swi10	rev3	rad23	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Marti TM (2003)	12807767	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency:partial rescue	mutation of rev3 decreases mutation swi10 mutant background	-	BIOGRID
246421	2542967	2539473	279407	276036	SPAC12B10.12c	SPCP25A2.02c	rhp41	rhp26	rhp4a	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Marti TM (2003)	12807767	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	double mutants show increased sensitivity to UV	-	BIOGRID
246423	2540473	2539206	277001	275776	SPBC30D10.10c	SPCC24B10.07	tor1	gad8	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Matsuo T (2003)	12805221	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246424	2539517	2539206	276079	275776	SPCC576.15c	SPCC24B10.07	ksg1	gad8	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Matsuo T (2003)	12805221	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246425	2540650	2539358	277175	275924	SPBC244.01c	SPCC16C4.07	sid4	scw1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2003)	12796296	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246426	2542761	2539358	279211	275924	SPAC1565.06c	SPCC16C4.07	spg1	scw1	sid3	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2003)	12796296	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246427	2540660	2539358	277185	275924	SPBC21.06c	SPCC16C4.07	cdc7	scw1	its10|pld1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2003)	12796296	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246428	2542746	2539358	279196	275924	SPAC9G1.09	SPCC16C4.07	sid1	scw1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2003)	12796296	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246429	2540624	2539358	277150	275924	SPBC24C6.07	SPCC16C4.07	cdc14	scw1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2003)	12796296	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246430	2541599	2539358	278096	275924	SPAC24B11.11c	SPCC16C4.07	sid2	scw1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2003)	12796296	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246431	2540845	2539358	277362	275924	SPBC428.13c	SPCC16C4.07	mob1	scw1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2003)	12796296	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246432	2540737	2539358	277260	275924	SPBC19G7.05c	SPCC16C4.07	bgs1	scw1	cps1|drc1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2003)	12796296	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246436	2540494	2538758	277022	275341	SPBC409.04c	SPCC1739.12	mis12	ppe1	-	esp1|ppx1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Goshima G (2003)	12773390	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246437	2540494	2542652	277022	279106	SPBC409.04c	SPAC1687.15	mis12	gsk3	-	skp1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Goshima G (2003)	12773390	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246438	2538758	2542652	275341	279106	SPCC1739.12	SPAC1687.15	ppe1	gsk3	esp1|ppx1	skp1	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Goshima G (2003)	12773390	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246439	2538757	2539047	275340	275620	SPCC16C4.08c	SPCC1223.06	skb15	tea1	-	alp8	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kim H (2003)	12764130	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology:wild type|septum formation:wild type|viability:wild type	The tea1 null mutation suppresses defects in F-actin organization and cell wall, septum synthesis and mitotic defects caused by loss of Skb15	-	BIOGRID
246440	2539997	2539047	276541	275620	SPBC1604.14c	SPCC1223.06	shk1	tea1	orb2|pak1	alp8	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Kim H (2003)	12764130	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246441	2539869	2542632	276415	279086	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC24H6.05	cdc2	cdc25	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	sal2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sveiczer A (1996)	9013342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:partial rescue	cdc2-3w/cdc25delta cells have a large amount of cell death but the living cells show improved size control compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
246442	2539123	2542632	275695	279086	SPCC18B5.03	SPAC24H6.05	wee1	cdc25	-	sal2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sveiczer A (1996)	9013342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:partial rescue	wee1/cdc25delta cells have a large amount of cell death but the living cells show improved size control compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
246443	2542162	2542409	278638	278873	SPAC6F6.08c	SPAC17G8.10c	cdc16	dma1	bub2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Murone M (1996)	8978687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246450	2541871	2541153	278361	277668	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC725.16	res2	res1	mcs1|pct1	sct1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sturm S (1996)	8970158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246452	2539639	2539474	276194	276037	SPBC106.09	SPCC645.14c	cut4	sti1	apc1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yamashita YM (1996)	8918880	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246453	2539639	2539207	276194	275777	SPBC106.09	SPCC285.09c	cut4	cgs2	apc1	pde1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yamashita YM (1996)	8918880	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246454	2539312	2541131	275879	277646	SPCC777.14	SPBC713.02c	prp4	ubp15	-	ubp21|ubpD	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Richert K (2002)	11919719	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246455	2541131	2539385	277646	275950	SPBC713.02c	SPCC188.08c	ubp15	ubp5	ubp21|ubpD	ubp22	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Richert K (2002)	11919719	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246457	2540329	2542140	276859	278616	SPBC29B5.01	SPAC1783.07c	atf1	pap1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	caf3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Quinn J (2002)	11907263	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	double mutants show increased sensitivity to H2O2	-	BIOGRID
246458	2539495	2542008	276058	278491	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC2G11.07c	ptc1	ptc3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Shiozaki K (1995)	7859738	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246459	2539252	2539495	275822	276058	SPCC1223.11	SPCC4F11.02	ptc2	ptc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Shiozaki K (1995)	7859738	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246460	2539252	2542008	275822	278491	SPCC1223.11	SPAC2G11.07c	ptc2	ptc3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Shiozaki K (1995)	7859738	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246461	2539495	2541055	276058	277570	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC409.07c	ptc1	wis1	-	smf2|spc2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Shiozaki K (1995)	7859738	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	Deletion of SMF2 rescues CaCl sensitivity in a ptc1/ptc3 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
246462	2542008	2541055	278491	277570	SPAC2G11.07c	SPBC409.07c	ptc3	wis1	-	smf2|spc2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Shiozaki K (1995)	7859738	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	Deletion of SMF2 rescues CaCl sensitivity in a ptc1/ptc3 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
246463	2543412	2541089	279834	277604	SPAC637.07	SPBC646.09c	moe1	int6	-	yin6	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yen HC (2000)	11121040	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246464	2541089	2543412	277604	279834	SPBC646.09c	SPAC637.07	int6	moe1	yin6	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yen HC (2000)	11121040	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246465	2542285	2541089	278753	277604	SPAC17H9.09c	SPBC646.09c	ras1	int6	ste5	yin6	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yen HC (2000)	11121040	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246466	2541089	2542285	277604	278753	SPBC646.09c	SPAC17H9.09c	int6	ras1	yin6	ste5	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yen HC (2000)	11121040	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246467	2542285	2541089	278753	277604	SPAC17H9.09c	SPBC646.09c	ras1	int6	ste5	yin6	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246468	2541089	2542285	277604	278753	SPBC646.09c	SPAC17H9.09c	int6	ras1	yin6	ste5	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246469	2541089	2542285	277604	278753	SPBC646.09c	SPAC17H9.09c	int6	ras1	yin6	ste5	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yen HC (2000)	11121040	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246470	2542576	2543097	279032	279529	SPAC22E12.09c	SPAC4A8.04	krp1	isp6	krp	prb1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ladds G (2000)	11115118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246471	2542576	2543256	279032	279684	SPAC22E12.09c	SPAC1006.01	krp1	psp3	krp	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ladds G (2000)	11115118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246472	2542576	2538927	279032	275503	SPAC22E12.09c	SPCC1795.09	krp1	yps1	krp	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ladds G (2000)	11115118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246473	2542576	2539074	279032	275646	SPAC22E12.09c	SPCC1259.10	krp1	pgp1	krp	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ladds G (2000)	11115118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246474	2542293	2542773	278761	279222	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC16.01	pck1	rho2	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Calonge TM (2000)	11102532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	cell wall inhibitors	-	BIOGRID
246475	2539649	2542773	276204	279222	SPBC12D12.04c	SPAC16.01	pck2	rho2	pkc1|sts6	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Calonge TM (2000)	11102532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	cell wall inhibitors	-	BIOGRID
246476	2542773	2539649	279222	276204	SPAC16.01	SPBC12D12.04c	rho2	pck2	-	pkc1|sts6	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Calonge TM (2000)	11102532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	glucanases	-	BIOGRID
246477	2543412	2542123	279834	278599	SPAC637.07	SPAC18G6.15	moe1	mal3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chen CR (2000)	11102508	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246478	2540149	2541059	276686	277574	SPBC1289.03c	SPBC557.03c	spi1	pim1	-	dcd1|ptr2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fleig U (2000)	11086011	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246479	2540149	2542161	276686	278637	SPBC1289.03c	SPAC1786.03	spi1	cut11	-	SPAC24C9.01	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fleig U (2000)	11086011	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246480	2540149	2542123	276686	278599	SPBC1289.03c	SPAC18G6.15	spi1	mal3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Fleig U (2000)	11086011	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246481	2540149	2541059	276686	277574	SPBC1289.03c	SPBC557.03c	spi1	pim1	-	dcd1|ptr2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Fleig U (2000)	11086011	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology:wild type|chromosome segregation:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246482	2542632	2539123	279086	275695	SPAC24H6.05	SPCC18B5.03	cdc25	wee1	sal2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Samuel JM (2000)	11085271	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246483	2542184	2539639	278659	276194	SPAC17C9.13c	SPBC106.09	cut8	cut4	-	apc1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tatebe H (2000)	11084332	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246484	2542184	2541592	278659	278089	SPAC17C9.13c	SPAC6F12.15c	cut8	cut9	-	dre1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tatebe H (2000)	11084332	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246485	2542184	2543222	278659	279650	SPAC17C9.13c	SPAC821.08c	cut8	slp1	-	cdc20	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tatebe H (2000)	11084332	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246486	2542184	2540025	278659	276569	SPAC17C9.13c	SPBC16G5.01	cut8	rpn12	-	SPBC342.07|mts3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tatebe H (2000)	11084332	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246487	2542184	2541193	278659	277707	SPAC17C9.13c	SPBC776.02c	cut8	dis2	-	bws1|sds1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tatebe H (2000)	11084332	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246490	2540690	2540392	277215	276920	SPBC428.20c	SPBC365.15	alp6	alp4	SPBC902.01c	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Vardy L (2000)	11080156	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246491	2540392	2540589	276920	277115	SPBC365.15	SPBC20F10.06	alp4	mad2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Vardy L (2000)	11080156	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation	-	-	BIOGRID
246492	2543240	2538959	279668	275533	SPAC694.06c	SPCC18B5.11c	mrc1	cds1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Tanaka K (2001)	11715017	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Overexpression of cds1 rescues the HU sensitivity of an mrc1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
246493	2539087	2538959	275659	275533	SPCC1259.13	SPCC18B5.11c	chk1	cds1	rad27	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tanaka K (2001)	11715017	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to HU	-	BIOGRID
246494	2539087	2543240	275659	279668	SPCC1259.13	SPAC694.06c	chk1	mrc1	rad27	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tanaka K (2001)	11715017	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to HU	-	BIOGRID
246495	2539869	2538689	276415	275274	SPBC11B10.09	SPCC1795.11	cdc2	sum3	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	ded1|moc2|slh3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Liu HY (2002)	11711540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246496	2539218	2542632	275788	279086	SPCC16C4.03	SPAC24H6.05	pin1	cdc25	-	sal2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Huang HK (2001)	11707530	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246497	2539218	2539123	275788	275695	SPCC16C4.03	SPCC18B5.03	pin1	wee1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Huang HK (2001)	11707530	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246498	2542761	2539379	279211	275945	SPAC1565.06c	SPCC188.02	spg1	par1	sid3	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Le Goff X (2001)	11707284	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246499	2539379	2541599	275945	278096	SPCC188.02	SPAC24B11.11c	par1	sid2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Le Goff X (2001)	11707284	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246500	2539379	2540845	275945	277362	SPCC188.02	SPBC428.13c	par1	mob1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Le Goff X (2001)	11707284	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246501	2539379	2542162	275945	278638	SPCC188.02	SPAC6F6.08c	par1	cdc16	-	bub2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Le Goff X (2001)	11707284	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246503	2540660	2539379	277185	275945	SPBC21.06c	SPCC188.02	cdc7	par1	its10|pld1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Le Goff X (2001)	11707284	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246504	2539149	2539379	275721	275945	SPCC1739.11c	SPCC188.02	cdc11	par1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Le Goff X (2001)	11707284	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246505	2542761	2541519	279211	278020	SPAC1565.06c	SPAC227.07c	spg1	pab1	sid3	ret1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Le Goff X (2001)	11707284	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246508	2542732	2542655	279182	279109	SPAC25G10.07c	SPAC3A11.14c	cut7	pkl1	-	SPAC3H5.03c|klp1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Troxell CL (2001)	11694582	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246509	2542161	2542655	278637	279109	SPAC1786.03	SPAC3A11.14c	cut11	pkl1	SPAC24C9.01	SPAC3H5.03c|klp1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Troxell CL (2001)	11694582	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246510	2539360	2539513	275926	276075	SPCC613.04c	SPCC645.05c	rng3	myo2	-	rng5	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Wong KC (2000)	10852821	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246513	2540128	2543666	276665	280080	SPBC15D4.03	SPAC644.06c	slm9	cdr1	-	nim1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kanoh J (2000)	10835386	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology	data not shown	-	BIOGRID
246514	2540128	2541590	276665	278087	SPBC15D4.03	SPAC57A10.02	slm9	cdr2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kanoh J (2000)	10835386	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology	data not shown	-	BIOGRID
246515	2542239	2541633	278711	278129	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC664.01c	chp1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Thon G (2000)	10835380	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	increased loss of minichromosomes	-	BIOGRID
246516	2542239	2540825	278711	277343	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC428.08c	chp1	clr4	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Thon G (2000)	10835380	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	increased loss of minichromosomes	-	BIOGRID
246518	2540580	2542029	277106	278511	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC8E11.02c	ran1	rad24	pat1	anr5|sam4	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Sato M (2002)	11818066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246519	2540580	2542029	277106	278511	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC8E11.02c	ran1	rad24	pat1	anr5|sam4	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sato M (2002)	11818066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246520	2542029	2542080	278511	278557	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC27D7.03c	rad24	mei2	anr5|sam4	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Sato M (2002)	11818066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246521	2539527	2542632	276089	279086	SPCC338.16	SPAC24H6.05	pof3	cdc25	-	sal2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Katayama S (2002)	11809834	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression	text only	-	BIOGRID
246524	2539527	2542558	276089	279014	SPCC338.16	SPAC1952.07	pof3	rad1	-	rad19	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Katayama S (2002)	11809834	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246525	2539527	2540719	276089	277242	SPCC338.16	SPBC216.05	pof3	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Katayama S (2002)	11809834	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246526	2539527	2541643	276089	278139	SPCC338.16	SPAC14C4.13	pof3	rad17	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Katayama S (2002)	11809834	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246527	2539527	2543289	276089	279714	SPCC338.16	SPAC9E9.08	pof3	rad26	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Katayama S (2002)	11809834	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246528	2539527	2539087	276089	275659	SPCC338.16	SPCC1259.13	pof3	chk1	-	rad27	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Katayama S (2002)	11809834	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246529	2539527	2540992	276089	277508	SPCC338.16	SPBC342.05	pof3	crb2	-	rhp9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Katayama S (2002)	11809834	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246530	2539527	2538959	276089	275533	SPCC338.16	SPCC18B5.11c	pof3	cds1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Katayama S (2002)	11809834	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246532	2542582	2543164	279037	279595	SPAC19G12.02c	SPAC3G6.06c	pms1	rad2	-	fen1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kunz C (2001)	11800554	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency	-	-	BIOGRID
246533	2540695	2541051	277219	277566	SPBC19G7.01c	SPBC3E7.08c	msh2	rad13	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kunz C (2001)	11800554	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246534	2540695	2540887	277219	277404	SPBC19G7.01c	SPBC4F6.15c	msh2	swi10	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	rad23	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kunz C (2001)	11800554	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246535	2540695	2543164	277219	279595	SPBC19G7.01c	SPAC3G6.06c	msh2	rad2	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	fen1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kunz C (2001)	11800554	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246536	2541051	2540887	277566	277404	SPBC3E7.08c	SPBC4F6.15c	rad13	swi10	-	rad23	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kunz C (2001)	11800554	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246537	2540345	2540887	276874	277404	SPBC19C7.09c	SPBC4F6.15c	uve1	swi10	uvde	rad23	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kunz C (2001)	11800554	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246538	2540887	2541051	277404	277566	SPBC4F6.15c	SPBC3E7.08c	swi10	rad13	rad23	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kunz C (2001)	11800554	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	MMS	-	BIOGRID
246539	2541051	2543164	277566	279595	SPBC3E7.08c	SPAC3G6.06c	rad13	rad2	-	fen1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kunz C (2001)	11800554	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	MMS	-	BIOGRID
246540	2540887	2543164	277404	279595	SPBC4F6.15c	SPAC3G6.06c	swi10	rad2	rad23	fen1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kunz C (2001)	11800554	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	MMS	-	BIOGRID
246541	2540624	2543539	277150	279956	SPBC24C6.07	SPAC926.04c	cdc14	hsp90	-	git10|swo1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ki SW (2001)	11791728	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246542	2540580	2541153	277106	277668	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC725.16	ran1	res1	pat1	sct1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ayte J (2001)	11781565	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246543	2541633	2539447	278129	276010	SPAC664.01c	SPCC338.17c	swi6	rad21	SPAC824.10c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Nonaka N (2002)	11780129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246544	2541633	2542387	278129	278851	SPAC664.01c	SPAC17H9.20	swi6	psc3	SPAC824.10c	SPAC607.01	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Nonaka N (2002)	11780129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246545	2542237	2540589	278709	277115	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC20F10.06	fin1	mad2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Grallert A (2002)	12065422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246546	2542237	2538736	278709	275320	SPAC19E9.02	SPCC1322.12c	fin1	bub1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Grallert A (2002)	12065422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246547	2542632	2541141	279086	277656	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC649.05	cdc25	cut12	sal2	stf1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Grallert A (2002)	12065422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246548	2541141	2542237	277656	278709	SPBC649.05	SPAC19E9.02	cut12	fin1	stf1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Grallert A (2002)	12065422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246549	2542632	2542237	279086	278709	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC19E9.02	cdc25	fin1	sal2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Grallert A (2002)	12065422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246553	2538694	2539601	275279	276159	SPCC191.09c	SPCC965.07c	gst1	gst2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Veal EA (2002)	12063243	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246554	2543289	2543204	279714	279633	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC821.04c	rad26	cid13	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Saitoh S (2002)	12062100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
246555	2540719	2543204	277242	279633	SPBC216.05	SPAC821.04c	rad3	cid13	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Saitoh S (2002)	12062100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
246556	2541643	2543204	278139	279633	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC821.04c	rad17	cid13	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Saitoh S (2002)	12062100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	hydroxyurea, data not shown	-	BIOGRID
246557	2542558	2543204	279014	279633	SPAC1952.07	SPAC821.04c	rad1	cid13	rad19	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Saitoh S (2002)	12062100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	hydroxyurea, data not shown	-	BIOGRID
246558	2543544	2543204	279961	279633	SPAC664.07c	SPAC821.04c	rad9	cid13	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Saitoh S (2002)	12062100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	hydroxyurea, data not shown	-	BIOGRID
246559	2538959	2543204	275533	279633	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC821.04c	cds1	cid13	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Saitoh S (2002)	12062100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
246560	2543204	2540719	279633	277242	SPAC821.04c	SPBC216.05	cid13	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Saitoh S (2002)	12062100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
246561	2543204	2538959	279633	275533	SPAC821.04c	SPCC18B5.11c	cid13	cds1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Saitoh S (2002)	12062100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
246562	2539869	2543204	276415	279633	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC821.04c	cdc2	cid13	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Saitoh S (2002)	12062100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
246564	2540248	2543412	276780	279834	SPBC336.03	SPAC637.07	efc25	moe1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Papadaki P (2002)	12052869	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246565	2540248	2539047	276780	275620	SPBC336.03	SPCC1223.06	efc25	tea1	-	alp8	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Papadaki P (2002)	12052869	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246566	2543412	2542285	279834	278753	SPAC637.07	SPAC17H9.09c	moe1	ras1	-	ste5	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Papadaki P (2002)	12052869	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246567	2543412	2542337	279834	278803	SPAC637.07	SPAC16E8.09	moe1	scd1	-	ral1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Papadaki P (2002)	12052869	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246568	2539047	2542285	275620	278753	SPCC1223.06	SPAC17H9.09c	tea1	ras1	alp8	ste5	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Papadaki P (2002)	12052869	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246569	2539047	2542337	275620	278803	SPCC1223.06	SPAC16E8.09	tea1	scd1	alp8	ral1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Papadaki P (2002)	12052869	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246570	3361533	2540719	280609	277242	SPAC222.15	SPBC216.05	meu13	rad3	SPAC821.01	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Shimada M (2002)	12032093	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spore germination	decreased spore viability and gene conversion frequency	-	BIOGRID
246571	3361533	2541643	280609	278139	SPAC222.15	SPAC14C4.13	meu13	rad17	SPAC821.01	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Shimada M (2002)	12032093	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spore germination	decreased spore viability and gene conversion frequency	-	BIOGRID
246572	3361533	2538959	280609	275533	SPAC222.15	SPCC18B5.11c	meu13	cds1	SPAC821.01	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Shimada M (2002)	12032093	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spore germination	decreased spore viability and gene conversion frequency	-	BIOGRID
246573	3361533	2541604	280609	278101	SPAC222.15	SPAC14C4.03	meu13	mek1	SPAC821.01	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Shimada M (2002)	12032093	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spore germination	decreased spore viability and gene conversion frequency	-	BIOGRID
246574	2541643	2542106	278139	278582	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC8E11.03c	rad17	dmc1	-	dmp1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Shimada M (2002)	12032093	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spore germination	decreased spore viability and gene conversion frequency	-	BIOGRID
246575	2540880	2539881	277397	276427	SPBC582.03	SPBC16G5.12c	cdc13	top3	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Caspari T (2002)	12023299	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionizing radiation resistance:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246576	2540992	2539881	277508	276427	SPBC342.05	SPBC16G5.12c	crb2	top3	rhp9	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Caspari T (2002)	12023299	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionizing radiation resistance:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246577	2540992	2541620	277508	278117	SPBC342.05	SPAC2G11.12	crb2	rqh1	rhp9	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Caspari T (2002)	12023299	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionizing radiation resistance:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246578	2540880	2541620	277397	278117	SPBC582.03	SPAC2G11.12	cdc13	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Caspari T (2002)	12023299	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionizing radiation resistance:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246580	2542438	2540307	278900	276837	SPAC17C9.01c	SPBC1A4.01	nuc2	apc10	SPAC1851.01|apc3	SPBC1E8.06	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kominami K (1998)	9736616	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246582	2538758	2540072	275341	276610	SPCC1739.12	SPBC16H5.07c	ppe1	ppa2	esp1|ppx1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Shimanuki M (1993)	8387356	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246583	2538758	2542293	275341	278761	SPCC1739.12	SPAC17G8.14c	ppe1	pck1	esp1|ppx1	SPAC22H10.01c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Shimanuki M (1993)	8387356	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246588	2540866	2541699	277383	278195	SPBC4C3.12	SPAP8A3.08	sep1	cdc4	SPBC4C3.05	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sipiczki M (1993)	8505375	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation	-	-	BIOGRID
246589	2541153	2540234	277668	276766	SPBC725.16	SPBC336.12c	res1	cdc10	sct1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Caligiuri M (1993)	7916653	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246590	2543040	2540025	279475	276569	SPAC31G5.13	SPBC16G5.01	rpn11	rpn12	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	SPBC342.07|mts3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Penney M (1998)	9727008	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246591	2543040	2541268	279475	277782	SPAC31G5.13	SPBP19A11.03c	rpn11	mts4	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	rpn1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Penney M (1998)	9727008	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246592	2540936	2542103	277452	278579	SPBC800.05c	SPAC31G5.11	atb2	pac2	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Vega LR (1998)	9725898	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246593	2541633	2540582	278129	277108	SPAC664.01c	SPBC26H8.07c	swi6	nda3	SPAC824.10c	alp12|ben1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Doe CL (1998)	9722643	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246594	2539864	2542239	276411	278711	SPBC16A3.15c	SPAC18G6.02c	nda2	chp1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Doe CL (1998)	9722643	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246595	2541051	2540345	277566	276874	SPBC3E7.08c	SPBC19C7.09c	rad13	uve1	-	uvde	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yasuhira S (1999)	10480889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	repair rate	-	BIOGRID
246597	2540719	2540345	277242	276874	SPBC216.05	SPBC19C7.09c	rad3	uve1	-	uvde	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yasuhira S (1999)	10480889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	repair rate	-	BIOGRID
246598	2539473	2540345	276036	276874	SPCP25A2.02c	SPBC19C7.09c	rhp26	uve1	-	uvde	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yasuhira S (1999)	10480889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	repair rate	-	BIOGRID
246599	2542814	2541847	279261	278338	SPAC13D6.05	SPAC22H10.10	alp11	alp21	SPAC4G9.01	sto1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Radcliffe PA (1999)	10473641	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246601	2542814	2541847	279261	278338	SPAC13D6.05	SPAC22H10.10	alp11	alp21	SPAC4G9.01	sto1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Radcliffe PA (2000)	10683446	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246602	2541847	2542814	278338	279261	SPAC22H10.10	SPAC13D6.05	alp21	alp11	sto1	SPAC4G9.01	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Radcliffe PA (2000)	10683446	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246604	2542814	2539669	279261	276224	SPAC13D6.05	SPBC11C11.04c	alp11	alp1	SPAC4G9.01	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Radcliffe PA (1999)	10473641	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246605	2542814	2539669	279261	276224	SPAC13D6.05	SPBC11C11.04c	alp11	alp1	SPAC4G9.01	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Radcliffe PA (2000)	10683446	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246606	2541847	2539669	278338	276224	SPAC22H10.10	SPBC11C11.04c	alp21	alp1	sto1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Radcliffe PA (1999)	10473641	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246607	2539020	2541071	275593	277586	SPCC5E4.06	SPBC582.05c	smc6	brc1	rad18	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Verkade HM (1999)	10473635	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246608	2539020	2541071	275593	277586	SPCC5E4.06	SPBC582.05c	smc6	brc1	rad18	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Verkade HM (1999)	10473635	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246609	2539020	2542237	275593	278709	SPCC5E4.06	SPAC19E9.02	smc6	fin1	rad18	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Verkade HM (1999)	10473635	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation	increased defects in chromosome segregation	-	BIOGRID
246610	2539020	2540541	275593	277068	SPCC5E4.06	SPBC1A4.03c	smc6	top2	rad18	ptr11	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Verkade HM (1999)	10473635	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation	increased defects in chromosome segregation	-	BIOGRID
246611	2541071	2540541	277586	277068	SPBC582.05c	SPBC1A4.03c	brc1	top2	-	ptr11	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Verkade HM (1999)	10473635	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation	increased defects in chromosome segregation	-	BIOGRID
246612	2539020	2540541	275593	277068	SPCC5E4.06	SPBC1A4.03c	smc6	top2	rad18	ptr11	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Verkade HM (1999)	10473635	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246613	2541071	2540541	277586	277068	SPBC582.05c	SPBC1A4.03c	brc1	top2	-	ptr11	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Verkade HM (1999)	10473635	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246614	2541818	2541652	278309	278148	SPAC11G7.02	SPAC24B11.06c	pub1	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Karagiannis J (1999)	10467003	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	alkaline pH resistance|auxotrophy	double mutants show synergy in suppressing the high-pH sensitivity of cells auxotrophic for leucine	-	BIOGRID
246615	2541706	2542632	278201	279086	SPAC16E8.15	SPAC24H6.05	tif45	cdc25	tif1	sal2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Daga RR (1999)	10462529	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type	overexpression of cdc25 rescued the tif1-d3-induced cell cycle block	-	BIOGRID
246616	2542162	2539958	278638	276502	SPAC6F6.08c	SPBC1718.07c	cdc16	zfs1	bub2	moc4	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Beltraminelli N (1999)	10462526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246617	2539958	2539123	276502	275695	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC18B5.03	zfs1	wee1	moc4	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltraminelli N (1999)	10462526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation	-	-	BIOGRID
246618	2540660	2539958	277185	276502	SPBC21.06c	SPBC1718.07c	cdc7	zfs1	its10|pld1	moc4	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Beltraminelli N (1999)	10462526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246619	2539149	2539958	275721	276502	SPCC1739.11c	SPBC1718.07c	cdc11	zfs1	-	moc4	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Beltraminelli N (1999)	10462526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246620	2540624	2539958	277150	276502	SPBC24C6.07	SPBC1718.07c	cdc14	zfs1	-	moc4	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Beltraminelli N (1999)	10462526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246621	2542761	2539958	279211	276502	SPAC1565.06c	SPBC1718.07c	spg1	zfs1	sid3	moc4	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Beltraminelli N (1999)	10462526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246622	2542746	2539958	279196	276502	SPAC9G1.09	SPBC1718.07c	sid1	zfs1	-	moc4	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Beltraminelli N (1999)	10462526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246623	2541599	2539958	278096	276502	SPAC24B11.11c	SPBC1718.07c	sid2	zfs1	-	moc4	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Beltraminelli N (1999)	10462526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246624	2540650	2539958	277175	276502	SPBC244.01c	SPBC1718.07c	sid4	zfs1	-	moc4	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Beltraminelli N (1999)	10462526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246627	2540345	2541051	276874	277566	SPBC19C7.09c	SPBC3E7.08c	uve1	rad13	uvde	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lombaerts M (2000)	10652237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	double mutants show increased sensitivity to UV damage	-	BIOGRID
246628	2541051	2540345	277566	276874	SPBC3E7.08c	SPBC19C7.09c	rad13	uve1	-	uvde	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lombaerts M (2000)	10652237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	double mutants show increased sensitivity to UV damage	-	BIOGRID
246629	2540345	2541051	276874	277566	SPBC19C7.09c	SPBC3E7.08c	uve1	rad13	uvde	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lombaerts M (1999)	10390527	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|chromosome/plasmid maintenance	double mutants show a lack of ability to repair photolesions in DNA	-	BIOGRID
246630	2541051	2540345	277566	276874	SPBC3E7.08c	SPBC19C7.09c	rad13	uve1	-	uvde	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lombaerts M (1999)	10390527	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|chromosome/plasmid maintenance	double mutants show a lack of ability to repair photolesions in DNA	-	BIOGRID
246632	2542657	2541849	279111	278340	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC20G8.01	mis4	cdc17	-	SPAC57A10.13c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Furuya K (1998)	9808627	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246637	2542083	2540008	278560	276552	SPAC27E2.05	SPBC12D12.02c	cdc1	cdm1	mis1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Reynolds N (1998)	9799358	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246638	2540255	2540008	276786	276552	SPBC336.04	SPBC12D12.02c	cdc6	cdm1	mis10|pol3|pold	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Reynolds N (1998)	9799358	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246639	2539627	2540008	276184	276552	SPBC1734.02c	SPBC12D12.02c	cdc27	cdm1	SPBC337.18c	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Reynolds N (1998)	9799358	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246640	2543407	2540008	279829	276552	SPAC8F11.07c	SPBC12D12.02c	cdc24	cdm1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Reynolds N (1998)	9799358	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246641	2539869	2540027	276415	276571	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC1734.14c	cdc2	suc1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	p13	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Gould KL (1998)	9790601	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246642	2539869	2540880	276415	277397	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC582.03	cdc2	cdc13	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Gould KL (1998)	9790601	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246643	2540112	2541940	276649	278427	SPBC11C11.02	SPAC27F1.02c	imp2	cdc8	-	fus4	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Demeter J (1998)	9786952	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246644	2540112	2539149	276649	275721	SPBC11C11.02	SPCC1739.11c	imp2	cdc11	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Demeter J (1998)	9786952	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246647	2541940	2540112	278427	276649	SPAC27F1.02c	SPBC11C11.02	cdc8	imp2	fus4	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Demeter J (1998)	9786952	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246648	2539149	2540112	275721	276649	SPCC1739.11c	SPBC11C11.02	cdc11	imp2	-	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Demeter J (1998)	9786952	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246649	2541975	2540112	278460	276649	SPAC20G8.05c	SPBC11C11.02	cdc15	imp2	-	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Demeter J (1998)	9786952	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246650	2541699	2540112	278195	276649	SPAP8A3.08	SPBC11C11.02	cdc4	imp2	-	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Demeter J (1998)	9786952	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246651	2541165	2541214	277680	277728	SPBC776.12c	SPBC839.07	hsk1	ibp1	cdc7	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Snaith HA (2003)	14508607	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246652	2541165	2538959	277680	275533	SPBC776.12c	SPCC18B5.11c	hsk1	cds1	cdc7	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Snaith HA (2003)	14508607	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246653	2541165	2538959	277680	275533	SPBC776.12c	SPCC18B5.11c	hsk1	cds1	cdc7	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Snaith HA (2000)	11027263	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246654	2541214	2539447	277728	276010	SPBC839.07	SPCC338.17c	ibp1	rad21	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Snaith HA (2003)	14508607	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246655	2539997	2542617	276541	279071	SPBC1604.14c	SPAC13A11.01c	shk1	rga8	orb2|pak1	SPAC2F7.18c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Yang P (2003)	14506270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246656	2539997	2542617	276541	279071	SPBC1604.14c	SPAC13A11.01c	shk1	rga8	orb2|pak1	SPAC2F7.18c	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Yang P (2003)	14506270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246657	2541612	2542617	278109	279071	SPAC1F7.04	SPAC13A11.01c	rho1	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yang P (2003)	14506270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246658	2539997	2541612	276541	278109	SPBC1604.14c	SPAC1F7.04	shk1	rho1	orb2|pak1	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Yang P (2003)	14506270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246659	2542337	2542635	278803	279089	SPAC16E8.09	SPAC24H6.09	scd1	gef1	ral1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hirota K (2003)	12972551	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246660	2542337	2543027	278803	279463	SPAC16E8.09	SPAC110.03	scd1	cdc42	ral1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Hirota K (2003)	12972551	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246661	2542635	2543027	279089	279463	SPAC24H6.09	SPAC110.03	gef1	cdc42	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Hirota K (2003)	12972551	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246662	2542632	2539123	279086	275695	SPAC24H6.05	SPCC18B5.03	cdc25	wee1	sal2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fantes PA (1981)	7217015	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type|cell size:wild type|heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246663	2542632	2539869	279086	276415	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC11B10.09	cdc25	cdc2	sal2	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fantes PA (1981)	7217015	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type|cell size:wild type|heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246664	2543382	2540589	279804	277115	SPAC890.02c	SPBC20F10.06	alp7	mad2	mia1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sato M (2003)	12951601	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246665	2543382	2540589	279804	277115	SPAC890.02c	SPBC20F10.06	alp7	mad2	mia1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sato M (2003)	12951601	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis|mitotic cell cycle	simultaneous disruptions of mad2 and alp7 result in defective mitosis with uncontrolled cytokinesis	-	BIOGRID
246666	2541975	2541603	278460	278100	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC1F5.04c	cdc15	cdc12	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Carnahan RH (2003)	12939254	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246667	2540024	2540019	276568	276563	SPBP4H10.04	SPBC1685.01	ppb1	pmp1	SPBC1346.01c	dsp1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Sugiura R (2003)	12931193	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionic stress resistance:undetermined|viability:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246668	2540024	2540019	276568	276563	SPBP4H10.04	SPBC1685.01	ppb1	pmp1	SPBC1346.01c	dsp1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Sugiura R (1999)	10365961	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246669	2540024	2540919	276568	277435	SPBP4H10.04	SPBC543.07	ppb1	pek1	SPBC1346.01c	mkk1|skh1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Sugiura R (2003)	12931193	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionic stress resistance:undetermined|viability:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246670	2540024	2539434	276568	275997	SPBP4H10.04	SPCC757.09c	ppb1	rnc1	SPBC1346.01c	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Sugiura R (2003)	12931193	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionic stress resistance:undetermined|viability:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246674	2541045	2543580	277560	279995	SPBC543.03c	SPAC644.14c	pku80	rad51	-	rhp51	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kibe T (2003)	12930956	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	double mutants have a significantly reduced telomere signal	-	BIOGRID
246675	2541045	2543086	277560	279519	SPBC543.03c	SPAC30D11.10	pku80	rad52	-	rad22|rad22A	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kibe T (2003)	12930956	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	double mutants have a significantly reduced telomere signal	-	BIOGRID
246677	3361511	2539407	280587	275972	SPAC23C4.08	SPCC970.09	rho3	sec8	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Wang H (2003)	12930742	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246678	2540127	3361511	276664	280587	SPBC106.20	SPAC23C4.08	exo70	rho3	SPBC582.02	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wang H (2003)	12930742	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246679	3361511	2540127	280587	276664	SPAC23C4.08	SPBC106.20	rho3	exo70	-	SPBC582.02	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang H (2003)	12930742	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246680	2540802	2539004	277321	275578	SPBC1921.02	SPCC4G3.05c	rad60	mus81	-	slx3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Boddy MN (2003)	12897162	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246681	2540582	2540825	277108	277343	SPBC26H8.07c	SPBC428.08c	nda3	clr4	alp12|ben1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ekwall K (1996)	8937982	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246682	2540582	2539050	277108	275623	SPBC26H8.07c	SPCC11E10.08	nda3	rik1	alp12|ben1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ekwall K (1996)	8937982	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246683	2540582	2541633	277108	278129	SPBC26H8.07c	SPAC664.01c	nda3	swi6	alp12|ben1	SPAC824.10c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ekwall K (1996)	8937982	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246684	2542732	2542655	279182	279109	SPAC25G10.07c	SPAC3A11.14c	cut7	pkl1	-	SPAC3H5.03c|klp1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Pidoux AL (1996)	8898367	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246685	2540234	2540880	276766	277397	SPBC336.12c	SPBC582.03	cdc10	cdc13	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yamano H (1996)	8895572	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246686	2541059	2541863	277574	278353	SPBC557.03c	SPAC22E12.07	pim1	rna1	dcd1|ptr2	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Matynia A (1996)	8887664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246692	2543583	2541124	279998	277639	SPAC644.12	SPBC646.02	cdc5	cwf11	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ohi MD (2002)	11884590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246693	2542657	2540589	279111	277115	SPAC31A2.05c	SPBC20F10.06	mis4	mad2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Toyoda Y (2002)	11882285	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spindle morphology:partial rescue	double mutants show more normal spindle length	-	BIOGRID
246694	2540361	2542632	276890	279086	SPBC2F12.13	SPAC24H6.05	klp5	cdc25	sot1	sal2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	West RR (2002)	11870212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression	-	-	BIOGRID
246695	2542632	2540361	279086	276890	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC2F12.13	cdc25	klp5	sal2	sot1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	West RR (2002)	11870212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression	-	-	BIOGRID
246697	2542632	2540361	279086	276890	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC2F12.13	cdc25	klp5	sal2	sot1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	West RR (2001)	11739790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size|cytoskeleton morphology	cdc25/klp5/klp6 triple mutants show size abnormalities related to microtubule formation|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
246698	2538736	2540361	275320	276890	SPCC1322.12c	SPBC2F12.13	bub1	klp5	-	sot1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	West RR (2002)	11870212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	text only	-	BIOGRID
246699	2538736	2539700	275320	276253	SPCC1322.12c	SPBC1685.15c	bub1	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	West RR (2002)	11870212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	text only	-	BIOGRID
246700	2539505	2540361	276068	276890	SPCC736.14	SPBC2F12.13	dis1	klp5	-	sot1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	West RR (2002)	11870212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	text only	-	BIOGRID
246701	2539505	2539700	276068	276253	SPCC736.14	SPBC1685.15c	dis1	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	West RR (2002)	11870212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	text only	-	BIOGRID
246702	2541603	2543526	278100	279944	SPAC1F5.04c	SPAC4A8.15c	cdc12	cdc3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Chang F (1997)	9105045	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246703	2540345	2541051	276874	277566	SPBC19C7.09c	SPBC3E7.08c	uve1	rad13	uvde	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yonemasu R (1997)	9092661	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	-	-	BIOGRID
246704	2543164	2540345	279595	276874	SPAC3G6.06c	SPBC19C7.09c	rad2	uve1	fen1	uvde	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yonemasu R (1997)	9092661	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246705	2543164	2541051	279595	277566	SPAC3G6.06c	SPBC3E7.08c	rad2	rad13	fen1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yonemasu R (1997)	9092661	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	-	-	BIOGRID
246706	2540345	2541620	276874	278117	SPBC19C7.09c	SPAC2G11.12	uve1	rqh1	uvde	hus2|rad12|rec9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yonemasu R (1997)	9092661	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	-	-	BIOGRID
246707	2543606	2541051	280021	277566	SPAC4C5.04	SPBC3E7.08c	rad31	rad13	uba4	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Shayeghi M (1997)	9092625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|viability	-	-	BIOGRID
246708	2543606	2541929	280021	278417	SPAC4C5.04	SPAC23C4.12	rad31	hhp2	uba4	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Shayeghi M (1997)	9092625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|viability	-	-	BIOGRID
246709	2543606	3361391	280021	280467	SPAC4C5.04	SPAC13G6.01c	rad31	rad8	uba4	SPAC5H10.14c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Shayeghi M (1997)	9092625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|viability	-	-	BIOGRID
246710	2543606	2539087	280021	275659	SPAC4C5.04	SPCC1259.13	rad31	chk1	uba4	rad27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Shayeghi M (1997)	9092625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|viability	-	-	BIOGRID
246711	2543606	2541695	280021	278191	SPAC4C5.04	SPAC1F7.05	rad31	cdc22	uba4	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Shayeghi M (1997)	9092625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|viability	-	-	BIOGRID
246712	2543606	2540234	280021	276766	SPAC4C5.04	SPBC336.12c	rad31	cdc10	uba4	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Shayeghi M (1997)	9092625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|viability	-	-	BIOGRID
246713	2543606	2539123	280021	275695	SPAC4C5.04	SPCC18B5.03	rad31	wee1	uba4	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Shayeghi M (1997)	9092625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|viability	-	-	BIOGRID
246714	2543327	2540471	279750	276999	SPAC1D4.06c	SPBC19F8.07	csk1	mcs6	-	cdk7|crk1|mop1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Saiz JE (2002)	12121616	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|mitotic cell cycle|spore germination	-	-	BIOGRID
246716	2539741	2541505	276293	278007	SPBC16A3.05c	SPAC57A7.04c	rae1	pabp	cut21	pab1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Thakurta AG (2002)	12112233	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	genetic complex|spPABP-GFP fusion protein expressed from a multicopy plasmid could suppress the growth and mRNA export defect of rae1-16 7 nup184-1 synthetic lethal mutations	-	BIOGRID
246717	2541770	2541505	278264	278007	SPAP27G11.10c	SPAC57A7.04c	nup184	pabp	-	pab1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Thakurta AG (2002)	12112233	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	genetic complex|spPABP-GFP fusion protein expressed from a multicopy plasmid could suppress the growth and mRNA export defect of rae1-16 7 nup184-1 synthetic lethal mutations	-	BIOGRID
246718	2541628	2542657	278124	279111	SPAC110.02	SPAC31A2.05c	pds5	mis4	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Wang SW (2002)	11861765	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246719	2541628	2539447	278124	276010	SPAC110.02	SPCC338.17c	pds5	rad21	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Wang SW (2002)	11861765	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246720	2539869	2539123	276415	275695	SPBC11B10.09	SPCC18B5.03	cdc2	wee1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Shiozaki K (1997)	9188094	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246722	2541153	2541871	277668	278361	SPBC725.16	SPAC22F3.09c	res1	res2	sct1	mcs1|pct1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Zhu Y (1997)	9118941	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246723	2540234	2541153	276766	277668	SPBC336.12c	SPBC725.16	cdc10	res1	-	sct1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Zhu Y (1997)	9118941	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue|heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246724	2540234	2541871	276766	278361	SPBC336.12c	SPAC22F3.09c	cdc10	res2	-	mcs1|pct1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Zhu Y (1997)	9118941	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue|heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246725	2540234	2541871	276766	278361	SPBC336.12c	SPAC22F3.09c	cdc10	res2	-	mcs1|pct1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Zhu Y (1994)	7926774	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246726	2542080	2540580	278557	277106	SPAC27D7.03c	SPBC19C2.05	mei2	ran1	-	pat1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Watanabe Y (1997)	9062192	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246729	2540234	2541153	276766	277668	SPBC336.12c	SPBC725.16	cdc10	res1	-	sct1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ayte J (1995)	7739540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246730	2538770	2542492	275353	278951	SPCC1753.02c	SPAC1B9.02c	git3	sck1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Jin M (1995)	7498728	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type|cellular morphology:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246731	2540810	2542492	277329	278951	SPBC19C7.03	SPAC1B9.02c	cyr1	sck1	git2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Jin M (1995)	7498728	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type|cellular morphology:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246732	2539781	2542492	276331	278951	SPBC106.10	SPAC1B9.02c	pka1	sck1	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Jin M (1995)	7498728	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type|cellular morphology:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246733	2542492	2539781	278951	276331	SPAC1B9.02c	SPBC106.10	sck1	pka1	-	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Jin M (1995)	7498728	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	exit from G0 (stationary phase)	disruption of the sck1 gene causes a significant delay in exit from stationary phase when combined with a disruption of the pka1 gene	-	BIOGRID
246734	2543298	2539649	279723	276204	SPAC6B12.15	SPBC12D12.04c	cpc2	pck2	rkp1	pkc1|sts6	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Won M (2001)	11263963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	-	-	BIOGRID
246735	2543298	2539649	279723	276204	SPAC6B12.15	SPBC12D12.04c	cpc2	pck2	rkp1	pkc1|sts6	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Won M (2001)	11263963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	hyperosmotic stress resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246736	2538906	2540873	275483	277390	SPCC1259.03	SPBC4C3.05c	rpa12	nuc1	-	rpa1|rpa190	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Imazawa Y (2001)	11254133	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246737	2539312	3361260	275879	280336	SPCC777.14	SPBP22H7.07	prp4	prp5	-	cwf1|pi024|SPACTOKYO_453.10	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Schwelnus W (2001)	11252721	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246738	2539312	2541185	275879	277699	SPCC777.14	SPBC6B1.07	prp4	prp1	-	zer1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Schwelnus W (2001)	11252721	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246740	2542674	2542540	279127	278997	SPAC26A3.12c	SPAC19D5.06c	dhp1	din1	rat1	rai1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Shobuike T (2001)	11238999	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246741	2542632	2541443	279086	277948	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC11E3.09	cdc25	pyp3	sal2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Rhind N (2001)	11238887	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246744	2542299	2543402	278766	279824	SPAC18B11.10	SPAC630.14c	tup11	tup12	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Janoo RT (2001)	11238405	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	-	-	BIOGRID
246757	2539971	2543290	276515	279715	SPBC1105.04c	SPAC9E9.10c	cbp1	cbh1	abp1	cbh	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Irelan JT (2001)	11238404	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246758	2539971	2539728	276515	276280	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC14F5.12c	cbp1	cbh2	abp1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Irelan JT (2001)	11238404	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246759	2539728	2539971	276280	276515	SPBC14F5.12c	SPBC1105.04c	cbh2	cbp1	-	abp1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Irelan JT (2001)	11238404	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology|chromosome segregation	double mutants show aberrant morphology and mitotic defects	-	BIOGRID
246760	2539974	2541720	276518	278214	SPBC32H8.07	SPAC23H3.13c	git5	gpa2	gpb1	git8	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Landry S (2001)	11238401	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	overexpression of gpa2 or expression of a constitutively active gpa2 allele rescues glucose repression of a reporter gene	-	BIOGRID
246762	2539974	2541720	276518	278214	SPBC32H8.07	SPAC23H3.13c	git5	gpa2	gpb1	git8	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Landry S (2000)	10747045	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246764	2540666	2541720	277191	278214	SPBC215.04	SPAC23H3.13c	git11	gpa2	-	git8	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Landry S (2001)	11238401	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	overexpression of gpa2 or expression of a constitutively active gpa2 allele rescues glucose repression of a reporter gene	-	BIOGRID
246767	2542418	2539764	278881	276315	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC14F5.04c	dad2	pgk1	hos2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nakamichi N (2000)	11193425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246768	2540880	2540654	277397	277179	SPBC582.03	SPBC19F5.01c	cdc13	puc1	-	SPBP8B7.32c	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Forsburg SL (1991)	1828291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246771	2539497	2539505	276060	276068	SPCC895.07	SPCC736.14	alp14	dis1	mtc1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Garcia MA (2001)	11432827	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246772	2539497	2540582	276060	277108	SPCC895.07	SPBC26H8.07c	alp14	nda3	mtc1	alp12|ben1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Garcia MA (2001)	11432827	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246773	2539497	2540936	276060	277452	SPCC895.07	SPBC800.05c	alp14	atb2	mtc1	alp2|ban5|tub1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Garcia MA (2001)	11432827	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246774	2539497	2540589	276060	277115	SPCC895.07	SPBC20F10.06	alp14	mad2	mtc1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Garcia MA (2001)	11432827	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation|viability	double mutants show decreased viability and defects in septation	-	BIOGRID
246775	2539497	2540589	276060	277115	SPCC895.07	SPBC20F10.06	alp14	mad2	mtc1	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Garcia MA (2001)	11432827	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246776	2540627	2539087	277153	275659	SPBC25H2.13c	SPCC1259.13	cdc20	chk1	pol2	rad27	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Feng W (2001)	11416129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246777	2540627	2540719	277153	277242	SPBC25H2.13c	SPBC216.05	cdc20	rad3	pol2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Feng W (2001)	11416129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246778	2540627	2541746	277153	278240	SPBC25H2.13c	SPAC20G4.04c	cdc20	hus1	pol2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Feng W (2001)	11416129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246779	2540627	2540255	277153	276786	SPBC25H2.13c	SPBC336.04	cdc20	cdc6	pol2	mis10|pol3|pold	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Feng W (2001)	11416129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246782	2542083	2542420	278560	278883	SPAC27E2.05	SPAC19D5.03	cdc1	cid1	mis1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wang SW (2000)	10757807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of Cid1 partially rescues HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423) sensitivity in a cdc1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
246783	2539627	2542420	276184	278883	SPBC1734.02c	SPAC19D5.03	cdc27	cid1	SPBC337.18c	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wang SW (2000)	10757807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of Cid1 partially rescues HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423) sensitivity in a cdc27 mutant	-	BIOGRID
246784	2539379	2542891	275945	279335	SPCC188.02	SPAC6F12.12	par1	par2	-	pbp2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Jiang W (2000)	10757751	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246785	2539741	2543082	276293	279515	SPBC16A3.05c	SPAC3C7.08c	rae1	elf1	cut21	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kozak L (2002)	12110682	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246786	2540727	2543082	277250	279515	SPBC1921.03c	SPAC3C7.08c	mex67	elf1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kozak L (2002)	12110682	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246787	2543082	2540727	279515	277250	SPAC3C7.08c	SPBC1921.03c	elf1	mex67	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kozak L (2002)	12110682	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	genetic complex|overexpression of mex67 rescues the growth defects in a rae1/elf1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
246788	2539741	2540727	276293	277250	SPBC16A3.05c	SPBC1921.03c	rae1	mex67	cut21	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kozak L (2002)	12110682	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	genetic complex|overexpression of mex67 rescues the growth defects in a rae1/elf1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
246789	2540727	2539741	277250	276293	SPBC1921.03c	SPBC16A3.05c	mex67	rae1	-	cut21	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kozak L (2002)	12110682	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	genetic complex|overexpression of rae1 rescues the growth defects in a mex67/elf1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
246790	2543082	2539741	279515	276293	SPAC3C7.08c	SPBC16A3.05c	elf1	rae1	-	cut21	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kozak L (2002)	12110682	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	genetic complex|overexpression of rae1 rescues the growth defects in a mex67/elf1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
246792	2541889	2542619	278379	279073	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC6G10.02c	pom1	tea3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Niccoli T (2003)	14663827	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	bipolar budding pattern	double mutants show increased defects in growth polarity	-	BIOGRID
246793	2541889	2539047	278379	275620	SPAC2F7.03c	SPCC1223.06	pom1	tea1	-	alp8	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Niccoli T (2003)	14663827	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	bipolar budding pattern	double mutants show increased defects in growth polarity	-	BIOGRID
246794	2539047	2542619	275620	279073	SPCC1223.06	SPAC6G10.02c	tea1	tea3	alp8	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Niccoli T (2003)	14663827	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	bipolar budding pattern	double mutants show increased defects in growth polarity	-	BIOGRID
246796	2540574	2542007	277101	278490	SPBC409.03	SPAC20H4.07	swi5	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Akamatsu Y (2003)	14663140	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|gamma ray resistance	The swi5/rhp57 double mutant was more sensitive to gamma-rays and UV irradiation than the swi5 or rhp57 single mutant	-	BIOGRID
246797	2542151	2541652	278627	278148	SPAC17A2.09c	SPAC24B11.06c	csx1	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rodriguez-Gabriel MA (2003)	14633985	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	double mutants show increased sensitivity to H2O2	-	BIOGRID
246798	2539517	2539649	276079	276204	SPCC576.15c	SPBC12D12.04c	ksg1	pck2	-	pkc1|sts6	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Graeub R (2003)	14625898	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246801	3361403	2540129	280479	276666	SPAC27D7.12c	SPBC12D12.08c	but1	ned8	SPAC27D7.12|mug107|prx	SPBC24C6.01c|nedd8|ubl1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yashiroda H (2003)	14623327	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	-	-	BIOGRID
246802	2539869	2539087	276415	275659	SPBC11B10.09	SPCC1259.13	cdc2	chk1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	rad27	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Walworth N (1993)	8497322	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246804	2539087	2539123	275659	275695	SPCC1259.13	SPCC18B5.03	chk1	wee1	rad27	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Walworth N (1993)	8497322	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246805	2542293	2539649	278761	276204	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC12D12.04c	pck1	pck2	SPAC22H10.01c	pkc1|sts6	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Toda T (1993)	8491190	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246806	2540555	2543327	277082	279750	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC1D4.06c	mcs2	csk1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Molz L (1993)	8467814	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue|heat sensitivity:partial rescue|nuclear morphology:partial rescue|septum formation:partial rescue	csk1 suppresses the temperature sensitivity, cell cycle defect and accumulation of septa and nuclei caused by mutation of mcs2 especially in cdc2/cdc25 mutant backgrounds	-	BIOGRID
246807	2542737	2540494	279187	277022	SPAC25B8.14	SPBC409.04c	mal2	mis12	-	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Jin QW (2002)	12242294	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246808	2539869	2540027	276415	276571	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC1734.14c	cdc2	suc1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	p13	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Brizuela L (1987)	3322810	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246809	2540032	2540541	276575	277068	SPBC1703.14c	SPBC1A4.03c	top1	top2	-	ptr11	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Uemura T (1987)	2827111	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246812	2542632	2543666	279086	280080	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC644.06c	cdc25	cdr1	sal2	nim1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Young PG (1987)	3448096	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246813	2542632	2541590	279086	278087	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC57A10.02	cdc25	cdr2	sal2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Young PG (1987)	3448096	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246814	2542632	2543666	279086	280080	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC644.06c	cdc25	cdr1	sal2	nim1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Russell P (1987)	3453113	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246815	2542655	2540223	279109	276756	SPAC3A11.14c	SPBC32F12.04	pkl1	gtb1	SPAC3H5.03c|klp1	tug1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Paluh JL (2000)	10749926	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246816	2540329	2542140	276859	278616	SPBC29B5.01	SPAC1783.07c	atf1	pap1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	caf3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nguyen AN (2000)	10749922	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	-	-	BIOGRID
246817	2541254	2543071	277768	279504	SPBC8D2.19	SPAC3C7.06c	mde3	pit1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Abe H (2000)	10747048	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis|sporulation	double mutants show increased defects in sporulation, meiosis and asci formation	-	BIOGRID
246818	2542007	2543164	278490	279595	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC3G6.06c	rad57	rad2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	fen1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tsutsui Y (2000)	10747044	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246819	2539971	2543290	276515	279715	SPBC1105.04c	SPAC9E9.10c	cbp1	cbh1	abp1	cbh	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Baum M (2000)	10733588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246820	2539971	2543290	276515	279715	SPBC1105.04c	SPAC9E9.10c	cbp1	cbh1	abp1	cbh	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Baum M (2000)	10733588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	-	-	BIOGRID
246821	2539164	2538689	275735	275274	SPCC16A11.17	SPCC1795.11	mcm4	sum3	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	ded1|moc2|slh3	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Grallert B (2000)	10725227	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246822	2540013	2538689	276557	275274	SPBC14C8.07c	SPCC1795.11	cdc18	sum3	-	ded1|moc2|slh3	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Grallert B (2000)	10725227	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246823	2540620	2538689	277146	275274	SPBC4.04c	SPCC1795.11	mcm2	sum3	cdc19|nda1	ded1|moc2|slh3	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Grallert B (2000)	10725227	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246824	2539164	2543481	275735	279901	SPCC16A11.17	SPAPB2B4.03	mcm4	cig2	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	cyc17	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Grallert B (2000)	10725227	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246825	2540620	2543481	277146	279901	SPBC4.04c	SPAPB2B4.03	mcm2	cig2	cdc19|nda1	cyc17	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Grallert B (2000)	10725227	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246826	2540013	2543481	276557	279901	SPBC14C8.07c	SPAPB2B4.03	cdc18	cig2	-	cyc17	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Grallert B (2000)	10725227	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246827	2540511	2539869	277039	276415	SPBC1718.01	SPBC11B10.09	pop1	cdc2	SPBC2G2.18|ste16	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kominami K (1997)	9203581	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246828	2540511	2540880	277039	277397	SPBC1718.01	SPBC582.03	pop1	cdc13	SPBC2G2.18|ste16	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kominami K (1997)	9203581	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246830	2542761	2540660	279211	277185	SPAC1565.06c	SPBC21.06c	spg1	cdc7	sid3	its10|pld1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Schmidt S (1997)	9203579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246831	2543239	2541818	279667	278309	SPAC977.10	SPAC11G7.02	sod2	pub1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Saleki R (1997)	9197411	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	double mutants show improved growth in the presence of lithium	-	BIOGRID
246832	2541726	2539513	278220	276075	SPAC22H10.07	SPCC645.05c	scd2	myo2	ral3	rng5	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kitayama C (1997)	9182664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246833	2541592	2539190	278089	275761	SPAC6F12.15c	SPCC1259.15c	cut9	ubc11	dre1	ubcdp|ubcp4	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Osaka F (1997)	9154838	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246834	2541652	2540329	278148	276859	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC29B5.01	sty1	atf1	phh1|spc1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Degols G (1997)	9154834	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue|protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246835	2540255	2540719	276786	277242	SPBC336.04	SPBC216.05	cdc6	rad3	mis10|pol3|pold	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Uchiyama M (1997)	9154809	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246836	2540255	2543289	276786	279714	SPBC336.04	SPAC9E9.08	cdc6	rad26	mis10|pol3|pold	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Uchiyama M (1997)	9154809	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246837	2540255	2539869	276786	276415	SPBC336.04	SPBC11B10.09	cdc6	cdc2	mis10|pol3|pold	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Uchiyama M (1997)	9154809	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nuclear morphology	double mutants show a cut nuclear phenotype	-	BIOGRID
246838	2540255	2543289	276786	279714	SPBC336.04	SPAC9E9.08	cdc6	rad26	mis10|pol3|pold	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Uchiyama M (1997)	9154809	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nuclear morphology	double mutants show a cut nuclear phenotype	-	BIOGRID
246839	2540255	2539087	276786	275659	SPBC336.04	SPCC1259.13	cdc6	chk1	mis10|pol3|pold	rad27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Uchiyama M (1997)	9154809	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nuclear morphology	double mutants show a cut nuclear phenotype	-	BIOGRID
246844	2542374	2542558	278838	279014	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC1952.07	cdt2	rad1	sev1	rad19	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yoshida SH (2003)	12871901	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246845	2542374	2540719	278838	277242	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC216.05	cdt2	rad3	sev1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yoshida SH (2003)	12871901	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246846	2542374	2541643	278838	278139	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC14C4.13	cdt2	rad17	sev1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yoshida SH (2003)	12871901	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246847	2542374	2543289	278838	279714	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC9E9.08	cdt2	rad26	sev1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yoshida SH (2003)	12871901	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246848	2542374	2538959	278838	275533	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC18B5.11c	cdt2	cds1	sev1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yoshida SH (2003)	12871901	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246849	2542374	2540381	278838	276910	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC25D12.04	cdt2	suc22	sev1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yoshida SH (2003)	12871901	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246850	2539261	2539914	275831	276458	SPCC1682.04	SPBC12D12.01	cdc31	sad1	-	SPBC16H5.01c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Paoletti A (2003)	12857865	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246851	2539914	2539261	276458	275831	SPBC12D12.01	SPCC1682.04	sad1	cdc31	SPBC16H5.01c	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Paoletti A (2003)	12857865	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246852	2540992	2543580	277508	279995	SPBC342.05	SPAC644.14c	crb2	rad51	rhp9	rhp51	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Smeets MF (2003)	12839619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of rhp51 rescues MMS sensitivity at 37 degrees in a crb2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
246853	2538959	2543580	275533	279995	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC644.14c	cds1	rad51	-	rhp51	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Smeets MF (2003)	12839619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of rhp51 rescues MMS sensitivity at 37 degrees in a checkpoint mutant	-	BIOGRID
246854	2543289	2543580	279714	279995	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC644.14c	rad26	rad51	-	rhp51	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Smeets MF (2003)	12839619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of rhp51 rescues MMS sensitivity at 37 degrees in a checkpoint mutant	-	BIOGRID
246855	2542558	2543580	279014	279995	SPAC1952.07	SPAC644.14c	rad1	rad51	rad19	rhp51	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Smeets MF (2003)	12839619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of rhp51 rescues MMS sensitivity at 37 degrees in a checkpoint mutant	-	BIOGRID
246856	2543544	2543580	279961	279995	SPAC664.07c	SPAC644.14c	rad9	rad51	-	rhp51	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Smeets MF (2003)	12839619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of rhp51 rescues MMS sensitivity at 37 degrees in a checkpoint mutant	-	BIOGRID
246857	2541746	2543580	278240	279995	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC644.14c	hus1	rad51	-	rhp51	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Smeets MF (2003)	12839619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of rhp51 rescues MMS sensitivity at 37 degrees in a checkpoint mutant	-	BIOGRID
246858	2541643	2543580	278139	279995	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC644.14c	rad17	rad51	-	rhp51	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Smeets MF (2003)	12839619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of rhp51 rescues MMS sensitivity at 37 degrees in a checkpoint mutant	-	BIOGRID
246859	2543580	2542558	279995	279014	SPAC644.14c	SPAC1952.07	rad51	rad1	rhp51	rad19	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Smeets MF (2003)	12839619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionizing radiation resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to DNA damage	-	BIOGRID
246860	2543580	2540719	279995	277242	SPAC644.14c	SPBC216.05	rad51	rad3	rhp51	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Smeets MF (2003)	12839619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionizing radiation resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to DNA damage	-	BIOGRID
246861	2543580	2543289	279995	279714	SPAC644.14c	SPAC9E9.08	rad51	rad26	rhp51	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Smeets MF (2003)	12839619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionizing radiation resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to DNA damage	-	BIOGRID
246862	2543580	2541746	279995	278240	SPAC644.14c	SPAC20G4.04c	rad51	hus1	rhp51	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Smeets MF (2003)	12839619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionizing radiation resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to DNA damage	-	BIOGRID
246863	2543580	2541643	279995	278139	SPAC644.14c	SPAC14C4.13	rad51	rad17	rhp51	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Smeets MF (2003)	12839619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionizing radiation resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to DNA damage	-	BIOGRID
246864	2543580	2543544	279995	279961	SPAC644.14c	SPAC664.07c	rad51	rad9	rhp51	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Smeets MF (2003)	12839619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionizing radiation resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to DNA damage	-	BIOGRID
246865	2540719	2543281	277242	279708	SPBC216.05	SPAC23C4.18c	rad3	rad4	-	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Harris S (2003)	12865439	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:wild type|radiation resistance:wild type|resistance to chemicals:wild type|viability:wild type	A dominant allele of rad4 suppresses the DNA damage and HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423) sensitivity phenotypes of checkpoint mutants	-	BIOGRID
246866	2543289	2543281	279714	279708	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC23C4.18c	rad26	rad4	-	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Harris S (2003)	12865439	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:wild type|radiation resistance:wild type|resistance to chemicals:wild type|viability:wild type	A dominant allele of rad4 suppresses the DNA damage and HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423) sensitivity phenotypes of checkpoint mutants	-	BIOGRID
246867	2541643	2543281	278139	279708	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC23C4.18c	rad17	rad4	-	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Harris S (2003)	12865439	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:wild type|radiation resistance:wild type|resistance to chemicals:wild type|viability:wild type	A dominant allele of rad4 suppresses the DNA damage and HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423) sensitivity phenotypes of checkpoint mutants	-	BIOGRID
246868	2541635	2539090	278131	275662	SPAC1556.01c	SPCC126.02c	rad50	pku70	SPAP4C9.01c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tomita K (2003)	12861005	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246869	2542757	2539090	279207	275662	SPAC13C5.07	SPCC126.02c	mre11	pku70	rad32	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tomita K (2003)	12861005	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246870	2541635	2541045	278131	277560	SPAC1556.01c	SPBC543.03c	rad50	pku80	SPAP4C9.01c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tomita K (2003)	12861005	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246872	2542313	2541635	278779	278131	SPAC16A10.07c	SPAC1556.01c	taz1	rad50	myb|myb1	SPAP4C9.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tomita K (2003)	12861005	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:wild type	text only	-	BIOGRID
246873	2542313	2542757	278779	279207	SPAC16A10.07c	SPAC13C5.07	taz1	mre11	myb|myb1	rad32	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tomita K (2003)	12861005	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:wild type	text only	-	BIOGRID
246874	2541055	2541293	277570	277805	SPBC409.07c	SPBC9B6.10	wis1	cdc37	smf2|spc2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tatebe H (2003)	12861001	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	The sws1 mutation suppresses the lethality of Wis1 overexpression even in the presence of Atf1	-	BIOGRID
246876	2542757	2540719	279207	277242	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC216.05	mre11	rad3	rad32	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tavassoli M (1995)	7885834	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246877	2542757	2543164	279207	279595	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC3G6.06c	mre11	rad2	rad32	fen1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tavassoli M (1995)	7885834	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246880	2543222	2540719	279650	277242	SPAC821.08c	SPBC216.05	slp1	rad3	cdc20	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Matsumoto T (1997)	9001228	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance	-	-	BIOGRID
246881	2543222	2539123	279650	275695	SPAC821.08c	SPCC18B5.03	slp1	wee1	cdc20	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Matsumoto T (1997)	9001228	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246882	2543222	2539869	279650	276415	SPAC821.08c	SPBC11B10.09	slp1	cdc2	cdc20	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Matsumoto T (1997)	9001228	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246883	2543222	2542632	279650	279086	SPAC821.08c	SPAC24H6.05	slp1	cdc25	cdc20	sal2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Matsumoto T (1997)	9001228	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246884	2543222	2543666	279650	280080	SPAC821.08c	SPAC644.06c	slp1	cdr1	cdc20	nim1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Matsumoto T (1997)	9001228	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246885	2543222	2541590	279650	278087	SPAC821.08c	SPAC57A10.02	slp1	cdr2	cdc20	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Matsumoto T (1997)	9001228	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246886	2543222	2539869	279650	276415	SPAC821.08c	SPBC11B10.09	slp1	cdc2	cdc20	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Matsumoto T (1997)	9001228	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246887	2543222	2541592	279650	278089	SPAC821.08c	SPAC6F12.15c	slp1	cut9	cdc20	dre1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Matsumoto T (1997)	9001228	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246888	2539123	2543481	275695	279901	SPCC18B5.03	SPAPB2B4.03	wee1	cig2	-	cyc17	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Wu L (1997)	8972180	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246892	2543281	2541695	279708	278191	SPAC23C4.18c	SPAC1F7.05	rad4	cdc22	cut5|dpb11|dre3	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	McFarlane RJ (1997)	9268024	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246894	2541592	2541193	278089	277707	SPAC6F12.15c	SPBC776.02c	cut9	dis2	dre1	bws1|sds1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yamada H (1997)	9264466	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246896	2541592	2540810	278089	277329	SPAC6F12.15c	SPBC19C7.03	cut9	cyr1	dre1	git2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Yamada H (1997)	9264466	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	double mutants are able to form colonies at lower temperatures	-	BIOGRID
246897	2542677	2539495	279130	276058	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC4F11.02	pyp1	ptc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gaits F (1997)	9211944	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246898	2542677	2542008	279130	278491	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC2G11.07c	pyp1	ptc3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gaits F (1997)	9211944	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246899	2542175	2539649	278650	276204	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC12D12.04c	mkh1	pck2	-	pkc1|sts6	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sengar AS (1997)	9199286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to potassium chloride	-	BIOGRID
246902	2539149	2539369	275721	275935	SPCC1739.11c	SPCC16A11.05c	cdc11	dim1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Berry LD (1997)	9182666	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression	-	-	BIOGRID
246903	2539869	2539369	276415	275935	SPBC11B10.09	SPCC16A11.05c	cdc2	dim1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Berry LD (1997)	9182666	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246904	2540989	2542511	277505	278969	SPBC3B9.07c	SPAC18G6.11c	rpa43	rrn3	rpa21	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Imazawa Y (2002)	12207036	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246905	2541699	2542035	278195	278517	SPAP8A3.08	SPAP8A3.04c	cdc4	hsp9	-	scf1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Jang YJ (1996)	8654972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:wild type|heat sensitivity:wild type	overexpression of hsp9 suppresses the elongated ts phenotype of cdc4-31	-	BIOGRID
246906	2540024	2541306	276568	277818	SPBP4H10.04	SPBP16F5.07	ppb1	apm1	SPBC1346.01c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kita A (2004)	15047861	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246908	2543577	2542007	279992	278490	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC20H4.07	srs2	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Doe CL (2004)	14993467	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	-	-	BIOGRID
246909	2543577	2541620	279992	278117	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC2G11.12	srs2	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Doe CL (2004)	14993467	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246910	2539004	2542749	275578	279199	SPCC4G3.05c	SPAC15A10.03c	mus81	rad54	slx3	rhp54	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Doe CL (2004)	14993467	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246911	2539741	2539077	276293	275649	SPBC16A3.05c	SPCC1739.14	rae1	npp106	cut21	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yoon JH (1997)	9372936	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246912	2541620	2541051	278117	277566	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC3E7.08c	rqh1	rad13	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Murray JM (1997)	9372918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	triple mutants show increased sensitivity to UV radiation compared to double mutants	-	BIOGRID
246913	2541620	2540345	278117	276874	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC19C7.09c	rqh1	uve1	hus2|rad12|rec9	uvde	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Murray JM (1997)	9372918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	triple mutants show increased sensitivity to UV radiation compared to double mutants	-	BIOGRID
246914	2543526	2540051	279944	276589	SPAC4A8.15c	SPBC32H8.12c	cdc3	act1	-	cps8|pi012	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Balasubramanian MK (1994)	8207058	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology:undetermined|cell shape:undetermined|cytokinesis:undetermined	overexpression of act1 rescues the cell morphology defects, cytokinesis arrest and actin abnormalities caused by overexpression of cdc3	-	BIOGRID
246915	2543539	2539495	279956	276058	SPAC926.04c	SPCC4F11.02	hsp90	ptc1	git10|swo1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Shiozaki K (1994)	8196617	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246916	2540660	2539149	277185	275721	SPBC21.06c	SPCC1739.11c	cdc7	cdc11	its10|pld1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Fankhauser C (1994)	8039497	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:wild type	mutation of cdc11 suppresses the formation of multiple septa and allows cells to proliferate normally in a cdc7 mutant	-	BIOGRID
246918	2540024	2539180	276568	275751	SPBP4H10.04	SPCC16C4.09	ppb1	sts5	SPBC1346.01c	orb4	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yoshida T (1994)	7983142	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246924	2541957	2542880	278444	279325	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC6F12.14	plo1	cut23	-	apc8	Dosage Rescue	genetic	May KM (2002)	11777938	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246925	2539513	2541599	276075	278096	SPCC645.05c	SPAC24B11.11c	myo2	sid2	rng5	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mulvihill DP (2001)	11739799	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246926	2539513	2540660	276075	277185	SPCC645.05c	SPBC21.06c	myo2	cdc7	rng5	its10|pld1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mulvihill DP (2001)	11739799	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246927	2539513	2542162	276075	278638	SPCC645.05c	SPAC6F6.08c	myo2	cdc16	rng5	bub2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mulvihill DP (2001)	11739799	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246928	2539513	2539149	276075	275721	SPCC645.05c	SPCC1739.11c	myo2	cdc11	rng5	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mulvihill DP (2001)	11739799	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246929	2539513	2540650	276075	277175	SPCC645.05c	SPBC244.01c	myo2	sid4	rng5	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mulvihill DP (2001)	11739799	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246930	2539513	2542761	276075	279211	SPCC645.05c	SPAC1565.06c	myo2	spg1	rng5	sid3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mulvihill DP (2001)	11739799	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246932	2542632	2539700	279086	276253	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC1685.15c	cdc25	klp6	sal2	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	West RR (2001)	11739790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size|cytoskeleton morphology	cdc25/klp5/klp6 triple mutants show size abnormalities related to microtubule formation|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
246935	2541635	2543086	278131	279519	SPAC1556.01c	SPAC30D11.10	rad50	rad52	SPAP4C9.01c	rad22|rad22A	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hartsuiker E (2001)	11726502	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	gamma ray resistance|resistance to chemicals	double mutants show reduced survival in the presence of gamma radiation and MMS (CID 4156 CHEBI 25255)	-	BIOGRID
246936	2541635	2543685	278131	280099	SPAC1556.01c	SPAC3C7.03c	rad50	rad55	SPAP4C9.01c	rhp55	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hartsuiker E (2001)	11726502	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	gamma ray resistance|resistance to chemicals	double mutants show reduced survival in the presence of gamma radiation and MMS (CID 4156 CHEBI 25255)	-	BIOGRID
246937	2541635	2543164	278131	279595	SPAC1556.01c	SPAC3G6.06c	rad50	rad2	SPAP4C9.01c	fen1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hartsuiker E (2001)	11726502	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246938	2541635	2539447	278131	276010	SPAC1556.01c	SPCC338.17c	rad50	rad21	SPAP4C9.01c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hartsuiker E (2001)	11726502	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	gamma ray resistance	double mutants show reduced survival in the presence of gamma radiation	-	BIOGRID
246941	2539881	2543580	276427	279995	SPBC16G5.12c	SPAC644.14c	top3	rad51	-	rhp51	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Oakley TJ (2002)	12509234	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246943	2539090	2542558	275662	279014	SPCC126.02c	SPAC1952.07	pku70	rad1	-	rad19	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246944	2539090	2543544	275662	279961	SPCC126.02c	SPAC664.07c	pku70	rad9	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246945	2539090	2541746	275662	278240	SPCC126.02c	SPAC20G4.04c	pku70	hus1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246946	2539090	2541643	275662	278139	SPCC126.02c	SPAC14C4.13	pku70	rad17	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246947	2539090	2540719	275662	277242	SPCC126.02c	SPBC216.05	pku70	rad3	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246948	2539090	2543289	275662	279714	SPCC126.02c	SPAC9E9.08	pku70	rad26	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246949	2539209	2540719	275779	277242	SPCC23B6.03c	SPBC216.05	tel1	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246950	2539209	2543289	275779	279714	SPCC23B6.03c	SPAC9E9.08	tel1	rad26	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246951	2542757	2540719	279207	277242	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC216.05	mre11	rad3	rad32	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	text only	-	BIOGRID
246952	2542757	2543289	279207	279714	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC9E9.08	mre11	rad26	rad32	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246953	2539209	2542558	275779	279014	SPCC23B6.03c	SPAC1952.07	tel1	rad1	-	rad19	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246954	2539209	2543544	275779	279961	SPCC23B6.03c	SPAC664.07c	tel1	rad9	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246955	2539209	2541746	275779	278240	SPCC23B6.03c	SPAC20G4.04c	tel1	hus1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246956	2539209	2541643	275779	278139	SPCC23B6.03c	SPAC14C4.13	tel1	rad17	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246957	2542757	2542558	279207	279014	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC1952.07	mre11	rad1	rad32	rad19	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246958	2542757	2543544	279207	279961	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC664.07c	mre11	rad9	rad32	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246959	2542757	2541746	279207	278240	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC20G4.04c	mre11	hus1	rad32	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246960	2542757	2541643	279207	278139	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC14C4.13	mre11	rad17	rad32	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246961	2541317	2539123	277829	275695	SPBP19A11.04c	SPCC18B5.03	mor2	wee1	cps12	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hirata D (2002)	12234926	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246962	2541317	2543441	277829	279861	SPBP19A11.04c	SPAC821.12	mor2	orb6	cps12	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Hirata D (2002)	12234926	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
246963	2542632	2541604	279086	278101	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC14C4.03	cdc25	mek1	sal2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Perez-Hidalgo L (2003)	12482912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246964	3361533	2542150	280609	278626	SPAC222.15	SPAC17A5.11	meu13	rec12	SPAC821.01	spo11	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Perez-Hidalgo L (2003)	12482912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246965	3361533	2541604	280609	278101	SPAC222.15	SPAC14C4.03	meu13	mek1	SPAC821.01	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Perez-Hidalgo L (2003)	12482912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246966	2542409	2542358	278873	278823	SPAC17G8.10c	SPAC1782.09c	dma1	clp1	-	flp1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Guertin DA (2002)	12479804	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
246968	2542409	2541957	278873	278444	SPAC17G8.10c	SPAC23C11.16	dma1	plo1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Guertin DA (2002)	12479804	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue	deletion of plo1 alleviates the spindle checkpoint stall seen in dma1 mutants	-	BIOGRID
246969	2542211	2540655	278685	277180	SPAC27D7.05c	SPBC83.04	apc14	apc15	omt1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246970	2540655	2539639	277180	276194	SPBC83.04	SPBC106.09	apc15	cut4	-	apc1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246971	2539869	2540880	276415	277397	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC582.03	cdc2	cdc13	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Fleig UN (1992)	1533272	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
246972	2542632	2542677	279086	279130	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC26F1.10c	cdc25	pyp1	sal2	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Hannig G (1994)	7937842	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246973	2542632	2542200	279086	278675	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC19D5.01	cdc25	pyp2	sal2	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Hannig G (1994)	7937842	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246974	2540620	2539164	277146	275735	SPBC4.04c	SPCC16A11.17	mcm2	mcm4	cdc19|nda1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Forsburg SL (1994)	7876346	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246975	2540148	2539627	276685	276184	SPBC16D10.04c	SPBC1734.02c	dna2	cdc27	-	SPBC337.18c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kang HY (2000)	10880469	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246976	2540148	2541849	276685	278340	SPBC16D10.04c	SPAC20G8.01	dna2	cdc17	-	SPAC57A10.13c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kang HY (2000)	10880469	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246977	2540148	2542083	276685	278560	SPBC16D10.04c	SPAC27E2.05	dna2	cdc1	-	mis1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kang HY (2000)	10880469	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246978	2540148	2543164	276685	279595	SPBC16D10.04c	SPAC3G6.06c	dna2	rad2	-	fen1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kang HY (2000)	10880469	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246979	2540148	2541849	276685	278340	SPBC16D10.04c	SPAC20G8.01	dna2	cdc17	-	SPAC57A10.13c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kang HY (2000)	10880469	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246980	2540148	2543164	276685	279595	SPBC16D10.04c	SPAC3G6.06c	dna2	rad2	-	fen1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kang HY (2000)	10880469	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246981	2540148	2543407	276685	279829	SPBC16D10.04c	SPAC8F11.07c	dna2	cdc24	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kang HY (2000)	10880469	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
246982	2539507	2539847	276070	276395	SPCC417.02	SPBC530.14c	dad5	dsk1	hos3|hsk3	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Aoyama K (2000)	10879493	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246983	2539149	2539358	275721	275924	SPCC1739.11c	SPCC16C4.07	cdc11	scw1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Karagiannis J (2002)	12242222	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246984	2540660	2539358	277185	275924	SPBC21.06c	SPCC16C4.07	cdc7	scw1	its10|pld1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Karagiannis J (2002)	12242222	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246985	2540624	2539358	277150	275924	SPBC24C6.07	SPCC16C4.07	cdc14	scw1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Karagiannis J (2002)	12242222	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246986	2542746	2539358	279196	275924	SPAC9G1.09	SPCC16C4.07	sid1	scw1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Karagiannis J (2002)	12242222	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246987	2541599	2539358	278096	275924	SPAC24B11.11c	SPCC16C4.07	sid2	scw1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Karagiannis J (2002)	12242222	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246988	2542761	2539358	279211	275924	SPAC1565.06c	SPCC16C4.07	spg1	scw1	sid3	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Karagiannis J (2002)	12242222	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246989	2540650	2539358	277175	275924	SPBC244.01c	SPCC16C4.07	sid4	scw1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Karagiannis J (2002)	12242222	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246990	2540845	2539358	277362	275924	SPBC428.13c	SPCC16C4.07	mob1	scw1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Karagiannis J (2002)	12242222	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246992	2542757	2539090	279207	275662	SPAC13C5.07	SPCC126.02c	mre11	pku70	rad32	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246993	2539209	2539090	275779	275662	SPCC23B6.03c	SPCC126.02c	tel1	pku70	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246994	2538959	2539090	275533	275662	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC126.02c	cds1	pku70	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246995	2539087	2539090	275659	275662	SPCC1259.13	SPCC126.02c	chk1	pku70	rad27	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246996	2540992	2539090	277508	275662	SPBC342.05	SPCC126.02c	crb2	pku70	rhp9	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246997	2541746	2543289	278240	279714	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC9E9.08	hus1	rad26	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246998	2541643	2540719	278139	277242	SPAC14C4.13	SPBC216.05	rad17	rad3	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
246999	2541746	2540719	278240	277242	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC216.05	hus1	rad3	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247000	2543544	2540719	279961	277242	SPAC664.07c	SPBC216.05	rad9	rad3	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247001	2542558	2540719	279014	277242	SPAC1952.07	SPBC216.05	rad1	rad3	rad19	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247002	2539090	2542313	275662	278779	SPCC126.02c	SPAC16A10.07c	pku70	taz1	-	myb|myb1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247003	2542757	2542313	279207	278779	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC16A10.07c	mre11	taz1	rad32	myb|myb1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247004	2539209	2542313	275779	278779	SPCC23B6.03c	SPAC16A10.07c	tel1	taz1	-	myb|myb1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247005	2538959	2542313	275533	278779	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC16A10.07c	cds1	taz1	-	myb|myb1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247006	2539087	2542313	275659	278779	SPCC1259.13	SPAC16A10.07c	chk1	taz1	rad27	myb|myb1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247007	2540992	2542313	277508	278779	SPBC342.05	SPAC16A10.07c	crb2	taz1	rhp9	myb|myb1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247008	2543289	2542313	279714	278779	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC16A10.07c	rad26	taz1	-	myb|myb1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247009	2540719	2542313	277242	278779	SPBC216.05	SPAC16A10.07c	rad3	taz1	-	myb|myb1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247010	2541643	2542313	278139	278779	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC16A10.07c	rad17	taz1	-	myb|myb1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247011	2541746	2542313	278240	278779	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC16A10.07c	hus1	taz1	-	myb|myb1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247012	2543544	2542313	279961	278779	SPAC664.07c	SPAC16A10.07c	rad9	taz1	-	myb|myb1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247013	2542558	2542313	279014	278779	SPAC1952.07	SPAC16A10.07c	rad1	taz1	rad19	myb|myb1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2002)	12196391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247014	2540234	2540847	276766	277364	SPBC336.12c	SPBC428.18	cdc10	cdt1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Hofmann JF (1994)	8313888	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247015	3361391	2541051	280467	277566	SPAC13G6.01c	SPBC3E7.08c	rad8	rad13	SPAC5H10.14c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Doe CL (1993)	8290359	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247016	3361391	2543544	280467	279961	SPAC13G6.01c	SPAC664.07c	rad8	rad9	SPAC5H10.14c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Doe CL (1993)	8290359	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247017	3361391	2539020	280467	275593	SPAC13G6.01c	SPCC5E4.06	rad8	smc6	SPAC5H10.14c	rad18	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Doe CL (1993)	8290359	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247018	3361391	2539447	280467	276010	SPAC13G6.01c	SPCC338.17c	rad8	rad21	SPAC5H10.14c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Doe CL (1993)	8290359	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247019	3361391	2543281	280467	279708	SPAC13G6.01c	SPAC23C4.18c	rad8	rad4	SPAC5H10.14c	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Doe CL (1993)	8290359	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247020	2540641	2538731	277166	275315	SPBC23G7.16	SPCC1393.10	ctr6	ctr4	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bellemare DR (2002)	12244050	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein activity	double mutants show a loss of copper,zinc-Sod1 activity	-	BIOGRID
247021	2542299	2543402	278766	279824	SPAC18B11.10	SPAC630.14c	tup11	tup12	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Greenall A (2002)	12221110	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation|stress resistance	-	-	BIOGRID
247027	3361260	2543583	280336	279998	SPBP22H7.07	SPAC644.12	prp5	cdc5	cwf1|pi024|SPACTOKYO_453.10	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	McDonald WH (1999)	10409726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247030	2539505	2540494	276068	277022	SPCC736.14	SPBC409.04c	dis1	mis12	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Goshima G (1999)	10398680	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247032	2542285	2542262	278753	278731	SPAC17H9.09c	SPAC17C9.10	ras1	stm1	ste5	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Chung KS (2001)	11461899	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247033	2541468	2542175	277970	278650	SPAC1F5.09c	SPAC1F3.02c	shk2	mkh1	pak2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Merla A (2001)	11453249	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247034	2541468	2539920	277970	276464	SPAC1F5.09c	SPBC119.08	shk2	pmk1	pak2	spm1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Merla A (2001)	11453249	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247035	2543027	2541468	279463	277970	SPAC110.03	SPAC1F5.09c	cdc42	shk2	-	pak2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Merla A (2001)	11453249	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247036	2543027	2542175	279463	278650	SPAC110.03	SPAC1F3.02c	cdc42	mkh1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Merla A (2001)	11453249	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247037	2543577	2541620	279992	278117	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC2G11.12	srs2	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang SW (2001)	11452021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology|chromosome/plasmid maintenance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247038	2543577	2543580	279992	279995	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC644.14c	srs2	rad51	-	rhp51	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang SW (2001)	11452021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247039	2543577	2543086	279992	279519	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC30D11.10	srs2	rad52	-	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Wang SW (2001)	11452021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247040	2543577	2542749	279992	279199	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC15A10.03c	srs2	rad54	-	rhp54	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Wang SW (2001)	11452021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247041	2543086	2541620	279519	278117	SPAC30D11.10	SPAC2G11.12	rad52	rqh1	rad22|rad22A	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang SW (2001)	11452021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247042	2543577	2541051	279992	277566	SPAC4H3.05	SPBC3E7.08c	srs2	rad13	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Wang SW (2001)	11452021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	double mutants show decreased viability in response to UV damage	-	BIOGRID
247043	2539087	2541849	275659	278340	SPCC1259.13	SPAC20G8.01	chk1	cdc17	rad27	SPAC57A10.13c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Capasso H (2002)	12415000	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247044	2539087	2541849	275659	278340	SPCC1259.13	SPAC20G8.01	chk1	cdc17	rad27	SPAC57A10.13c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Capasso H (2002)	12415000	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247045	2542558	2539087	279014	275659	SPAC1952.07	SPCC1259.13	rad1	chk1	rad19	rad27	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Matsuura A (1999)	10430579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of chk1 relieves sensitivity to UV but not telomere shortening in a rad1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
247046	2542558	2538959	279014	275533	SPAC1952.07	SPCC18B5.11c	rad1	cds1	rad19	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Matsuura A (1999)	10430579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression relieves sensitivity to HU but telomere shortening	-	BIOGRID
247047	2539209	2543289	275779	279714	SPCC23B6.03c	SPAC9E9.08	tel1	rad26	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Matsuura A (1999)	10430579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	double mutants show enhanced telomere shortening	-	BIOGRID
247048	2539209	2542558	275779	279014	SPCC23B6.03c	SPAC1952.07	tel1	rad1	-	rad19	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Matsuura A (1999)	10430579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals	double mutants show increased sensitivity to DNA damaging agents	-	BIOGRID
247049	2542632	2540398	279086	276926	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC26H8.10	cdc25	dis3	sal2	rrp44	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kinoshita N (1991)	1944266	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined	genetic complex|overexpression of dis3 rescues the temperature sensitive phenotype of a cdc25/wee1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
247050	2539123	2540398	275695	276926	SPCC18B5.03	SPBC26H8.10	wee1	dis3	-	rrp44	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kinoshita N (1991)	1944266	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined	genetic complex|overexpression of dis3 rescues the temperature sensitive phenotype of a cdc25/wee1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
247051	2541193	2540398	277707	276926	SPBC776.02c	SPBC26H8.10	dis2	dis3	bws1|sds1	rrp44	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kinoshita N (1991)	1944266	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247052	2539513	2541699	276075	278195	SPCC645.05c	SPAP8A3.08	myo2	cdc4	rng5	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Naqvi NI (1999)	10022828	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247053	2540511	2543514	277039	279932	SPBC1718.01	SPAC4D7.03	pop1	pop2	SPBC2G2.18|ste16	sud1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kominami K (1998)	9990507	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size|chromosome/plasmid maintenance	double mutants show enhanced polyploidy and large cell size	-	BIOGRID
247054	2540342	2541695	276871	278191	SPBC2G2.01c	SPAC1F7.05	liz1	cdc22	SPBC4B4.13c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Moynihan EB (1999)	9950674	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression	-	-	BIOGRID
247055	2540342	2539123	276871	275695	SPBC2G2.01c	SPCC18B5.03	liz1	wee1	SPBC4B4.13c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Moynihan EB (1999)	9950674	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression	-	-	BIOGRID
247056	2540992	2539627	277508	276184	SPBC342.05	SPBC1734.02c	crb2	cdc27	rhp9	SPBC337.18c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Grenon M (1999)	9928931	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	double mutants show mitotic catastrophe and a cut phenotype	-	BIOGRID
247057	2540992	2543629	277508	280043	SPBC342.05	SPAC3H5.06c	crb2	pol1	rhp9	polA|swi7	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Grenon M (1999)	9928931	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	double mutants show mitotic catastrophe and a cut phenotype	-	BIOGRID
247058	2540992	2540627	277508	277153	SPBC342.05	SPBC25H2.13c	crb2	cdc20	rhp9	pol2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Grenon M (1999)	9928931	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	double mutants show mitotic catastrophe and a cut phenotype	-	BIOGRID
247059	2540992	2540013	277508	276557	SPBC342.05	SPBC14C8.07c	crb2	cdc18	rhp9	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Grenon M (1999)	9928931	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	double mutants show mitotic catastrophe and a cut phenotype	-	BIOGRID
247060	2540992	2541849	277508	278340	SPBC342.05	SPAC20G8.01	crb2	cdc17	rhp9	SPAC57A10.13c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Grenon M (1999)	9928931	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	double mutants show mitotic catastrophe and a cut phenotype	-	BIOGRID
247061	2540992	2543407	277508	279829	SPBC342.05	SPAC8F11.07c	crb2	cdc24	rhp9	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Grenon M (1999)	9928931	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	double mutants show mitotic catastrophe and a cut phenotype	-	BIOGRID
247062	2540992	2540234	277508	276766	SPBC342.05	SPBC336.12c	crb2	cdc10	rhp9	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Grenon M (1999)	9928931	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	double mutants show mitotic catastrophe and a cut phenotype	-	BIOGRID
247063	2540992	2539627	277508	276184	SPBC342.05	SPBC1734.02c	crb2	cdc27	rhp9	SPBC337.18c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Grenon M (1999)	9928931	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|mitotic cell cycle	double mutants show mitotic catastrophe	-	BIOGRID
247064	2540992	2543629	277508	280043	SPBC342.05	SPAC3H5.06c	crb2	pol1	rhp9	polA|swi7	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Grenon M (1999)	9928931	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|mitotic cell cycle	double mutants show mitotic catastrophe	-	BIOGRID
247066	2540032	2540541	276575	277068	SPBC1703.14c	SPBC1A4.03c	top1	top2	-	ptr11	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Albrecht EB (2000)	10712506	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	-	-	BIOGRID
247067	2540737	2539123	277260	275695	SPBC19G7.05c	SPCC18B5.03	bgs1	wee1	cps1|drc1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Liu J (2000)	10704373	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression through the G2/M phase transition:wild type	The the G(2)/M transition defect of cps1-191 mutants is suppressed by a mutation in the wee1 gene and also by the dominant cdc2 allele cdc2-1w	-	BIOGRID
247068	2540737	2539869	277260	276415	SPBC19G7.05c	SPBC11B10.09	bgs1	cdc2	cps1|drc1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Liu J (2000)	10704373	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression through the G2/M phase transition:wild type	The the G(2)/M transition defect of cps1-191 mutants is suppressed by a mutation in the wee1 gene and also by the dominant cdc2 allele cdc2-1w	-	BIOGRID
247070	2541769	2539669	278263	276224	SPAC22F3.05c	SPBC11C11.04c	alp41	alp1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Radcliffe PA (2000)	10683446	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247071	2540627	2541643	277153	278139	SPBC25H2.13c	SPAC14C4.13	cdc20	rad17	pol2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Griffiths D (2000)	10683155	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle|vegetative growth	double mutants enter mitosis and display a cut phenotype	-	BIOGRID
247072	2540627	2539087	277153	275659	SPBC25H2.13c	SPCC1259.13	cdc20	chk1	pol2	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Griffiths D (2000)	10683155	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle|vegetative growth	double mutants enter mitosis and display a cut phenotype	-	BIOGRID
247073	2541643	2540627	278139	277153	SPAC14C4.13	SPBC25H2.13c	rad17	cdc20	-	pol2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Griffiths D (2000)	10683155	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	double mutants display defects in mitotic cell cycle with increases in cut phenotypes	-	BIOGRID
247074	2541643	2539164	278139	275735	SPAC14C4.13	SPCC16A11.17	rad17	mcm4	-	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Griffiths D (2000)	10683155	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	double mutants display defects in mitotic cell cycle with increases in cut phenotypes	-	BIOGRID
247075	2541643	2542083	278139	278560	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC27E2.05	rad17	cdc1	-	mis1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Griffiths D (2000)	10683155	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	double mutants display defects in mitotic cell cycle with increases in cut phenotypes	-	BIOGRID
247076	2541643	2541695	278139	278191	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC1F7.05	rad17	cdc22	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Griffiths D (2000)	10683155	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	double mutants display defects in mitotic cell cycle with increases in cut phenotypes	-	BIOGRID
247077	2541643	2542083	278139	278560	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC27E2.05	rad17	cdc1	-	mis1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Griffiths D (2000)	10683155	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	rad17 null	-	BIOGRID
247078	2541643	2541695	278139	278191	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC1F7.05	rad17	cdc22	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Griffiths D (2000)	10683155	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	rad17 null	-	BIOGRID
247079	2539087	2540627	275659	277153	SPCC1259.13	SPBC25H2.13c	chk1	cdc20	rad27	pol2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Griffiths D (2000)	10683155	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	double mutants display defects in mitotic cell cycle with increases in cut phenotypes	-	BIOGRID
247080	2539087	2539164	275659	275735	SPCC1259.13	SPCC16A11.17	chk1	mcm4	rad27	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Griffiths D (2000)	10683155	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	double mutants display defects in mitotic cell cycle with increases in cut phenotypes	-	BIOGRID
247081	2539087	2542083	275659	278560	SPCC1259.13	SPAC27E2.05	chk1	cdc1	rad27	mis1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Griffiths D (2000)	10683155	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	double mutants display defects in mitotic cell cycle with increases in cut phenotypes	-	BIOGRID
247082	2539087	2541695	275659	278191	SPCC1259.13	SPAC1F7.05	chk1	cdc22	rad27	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Griffiths D (2000)	10683155	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	double mutants display defects in mitotic cell cycle with increases in cut phenotypes	-	BIOGRID
247084	2543481	2539640	279901	276195	SPAPB2B4.03	SPBC32F12.09	cig2	rum1	cyc17	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Martin-Castellanos C (2000)	10679013	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue	The cell cycle defect seen in CIG1/CIG2/PUC1 triple mutants can be rescued by deletion of RUM1	-	BIOGRID
247085	2540654	2539640	277179	276195	SPBC19F5.01c	SPBC32F12.09	puc1	rum1	SPBP8B7.32c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Martin-Castellanos C (2000)	10679013	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue	The cell cycle defect seen in CIG1/CIG2/PUC1 triple mutants can be rescued by deletion of RUM1	-	BIOGRID
247086	2542632	3361433	279086	280509	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC1071.12c	cdc25	stp1	sal2	SPAC926.01c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Mondesert O (1994)	7961734	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247087	2542632	2541443	279086	277948	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC11E3.09	cdc25	pyp3	sal2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Mondesert O (1994)	7961734	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247088	2541443	2542632	277948	279086	SPAC11E3.09	SPAC24H6.05	pyp3	cdc25	-	sal2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Mondesert O (1994)	7961734	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show increased cell length	-	BIOGRID
247089	2542438	2541592	278900	278089	SPAC17C9.01c	SPAC6F12.15c	nuc2	cut9	SPAC1851.01|apc3	dre1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Samejima I (1994)	7798319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247091	2541159	2542558	277674	279014	SPBC685.09	SPAC1952.07	orc2	rad1	orp2	rad19	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kiely J (2000)	10655214	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue|chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247092	2541159	2540719	277674	277242	SPBC685.09	SPBC216.05	orc2	rad3	orp2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kiely J (2000)	10655214	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue|chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247093	2540345	2540481	276874	277009	SPBC19C7.09c	SPBC2D10.12	uve1	rhp23	uvde	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lombaerts M (2000)	10652237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	uvde rhp23 double mutants are unable to repair cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers	-	BIOGRID
247102	2542632	2539087	279086	275659	SPAC24H6.05	SPCC1259.13	cdc25	chk1	sal2	rad27	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Baber-Furnari BA (2000)	10637286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:wild type|protein/peptide accumulation:undetermined|radiation resistance:wild type	deletion of chk1 relieves the mitotic delay seen in a cdc25/cdc2 double mutant upon exposure to radiation|deletion of rad3 or chk1 inhibits the accumulation of mik1 in cdc25 mutant cells in response to bleomycin|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
247103	2543048	3361385	279483	280461	SPAC3F10.02c	SPAC1639.02c	trk1	trk2	sptrk	SPAC1F5.12	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Calero F (2000)	10629185	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient uptake	-	-	BIOGRID
247104	2539645	2539847	276200	276395	SPBC146.07	SPBC530.14c	prp2	dsk1	mis11|ods1|uaf1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tang Z (2000)	10629038	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247105	2543027	2540771	279463	277291	SPAC110.03	SPBC21B10.04c	cdc42	nrf1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Murray JM (2000)	10628977	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	Overexpression of NRF1 blocks the rescue of CDC24 mutant cells by CDC42	-	BIOGRID
247106	2540771	2543027	277291	279463	SPBC21B10.04c	SPAC110.03	nrf1	cdc42	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Murray JM (2000)	10628977	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	Overexpression of NRF1 blocks the rescue of CDC24 mutant cells by CDC42	-	BIOGRID
247108	2540771	2543027	277291	279463	SPBC21B10.04c	SPAC110.03	nrf1	cdc42	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Murray JM (2001)	11042180	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	endocytosis:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247109	2543027	2540083	279463	276621	SPAC110.03	SPBC119.02	cdc42	ubc4	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Murray JM (2000)	10628977	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	Overexpression of UBC4 blocks the rescue of CDC24 mutant cells by CDC42	-	BIOGRID
247110	2543027	2540487	279463	277015	SPAC110.03	SPBC23G7.12c	cdc42	rpt6	-	let1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Murray JM (2000)	10628977	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	Overexpression of LET1 blocks the rescue of CDC24 mutant cells by CDC42	-	BIOGRID
247111	2543027	2542084	279463	278561	SPAC110.03	SPAC7D4.07c	cdc42	trx1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Murray JM (2000)	10628977	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	Overexpression of TRX1 blocks the rescue of CDC24 mutant cells by CDC42	-	BIOGRID
247112	2543027	3361358	279463	280434	SPAC110.03	SPBC3F6.03	cdc42	trr1	-	caf4	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Murray JM (2000)	10628977	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	Overexpression of CAF4 blocks the rescue of CDC24 mutant cells by CDC42	-	BIOGRID
247113	2543027	2543607	279463	280022	SPAC110.03	SPAC4F8.07c	cdc42	hxk2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Murray JM (2000)	10628977	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	Overexpression of HXK2 blocks the rescue of CDC24 mutant cells by CDC42	-	BIOGRID
247114	2543027	2542035	279463	278517	SPAC110.03	SPAP8A3.04c	cdc42	hsp9	-	scf1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Murray JM (2000)	10628977	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	Overexpression of HSP9 blocks the rescue of CDC24 mutant cells by CDC42	-	BIOGRID
247115	2543027	2539588	279463	276146	SPAC110.03	SPCC962.04	cdc42	rps1201	-	rps12|rps12-1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Murray JM (2000)	10628977	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	Overexpression of RPS12 blocks the rescue of CDC24 mutant cells by CDC42	-	BIOGRID
247116	2543027	2542108	279463	278584	SPAC110.03	SPAC6F6.07c	cdc42	rps13	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Murray JM (2000)	10628977	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	Overexpression of RPS13 blocks the rescue of CDC24 mutant cells by CDC42	-	BIOGRID
247117	2543027	2539969	279463	276513	SPAC110.03	SPBC1685.10	cdc42	rps27	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Murray JM (2000)	10628977	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	Overexpression of RPS27 blocks the rescue of CDC24 mutant cells by CDC42	-	BIOGRID
247118	2543027	2541591	279463	278088	SPAC110.03	SPAC26A3.07c	cdc42	rpl1101	-	rpl11|rpl11-1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Murray JM (2000)	10628977	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	Overexpression of RPL11 blocks the rescue of CDC24 mutant cells by CDC42	-	BIOGRID
247119	2543027	2540644	279463	277169	SPAC110.03	SPBC405.07	cdc42	rpl3602	-	rpl36|rpl36-2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Murray JM (2000)	10628977	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	Overexpression of RPL36 blocks the rescue of CDC24 mutant cells by CDC42	-	BIOGRID
247120	2542619	2541889	279073	278379	SPAC6G10.02c	SPAC2F7.03c	tea3	pom1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Arellano M (2002)	12007420	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247122	2541268	2543537	277782	279954	SPBP19A11.03c	SPAC4D7.05	mts4	sum1	rpn1	tif34	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Dunand-Sauthier I (2002)	12006658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247123	2542266	2542628	278735	279082	SPAC17D4.02	SPAC24H6.06	cdc45	sld3	goa1|sna41	mug175	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nakajima R (2002)	12006645	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247126	2540470	2540013	276998	276557	SPBC29A10.15	SPBC14C8.07c	orc1	cdc18	cdc30|orp1|rid1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Murakami H (2002)	11988741	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in S phase	double mutants show increased defects in S-phase and DNA replication	-	BIOGRID
247127	2539997	2539047	276541	275620	SPBC1604.14c	SPCC1223.06	shk1	tea1	orb2|pak1	alp8	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Qyang Y (2002)	11972773	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247131	2541818	2542432	278309	278894	SPAC11G7.02	SPAC1805.15c	pub1	pub2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tamai KK (2002)	11956316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247132	2539781	2542492	276331	278951	SPBC106.10	SPAC1B9.02c	pka1	sck1	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hatanaka M (2001)	11180454	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spore germination	double mutants show reduced capacity for spore germination	-	BIOGRID
247135	2542313	2539090	278779	275662	SPAC16A10.07c	SPCC126.02c	taz1	pku70	myb|myb1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ferreira MG (2001)	11172711	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	double mutants show increased viability and decreased DNA fragments containing fused telomeres compared to a taz1 single mutant	-	BIOGRID
247136	2542313	2539042	278779	275615	SPAC16A10.07c	SPCC1183.05c	taz1	lig4	myb|myb1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ferreira MG (2001)	11172711	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	double mutants show increased viability and decreased DNA fragments containing fused telomeres compared to a taz1 single mutant	-	BIOGRID
247138	2542632	2542029	279086	278511	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC8E11.02c	cdc25	rad24	sal2	anr5|sam4	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Lopez-Girona A (2001)	11166180	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	critical cell size at G2/M (cryptic G2/M cell size checkpoint):wild type	deletion of rad24 abolishes the checkpoint delay seen in a cdc25 localization mutant	-	BIOGRID
247140	2543481	2539640	279901	276195	SPAPB2B4.03	SPBC32F12.09	cig2	rum1	cyc17	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yamano H (2000)	11163211	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247141	2543323	2539087	279746	275659	SPAC6B12.10c	SPCC1259.13	spp1	chk1	pri1	rad27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Griffiths DJ (2001)	11160827	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression through the G2/M phase transition	spp1/chk1 double mutants displayed a severe mitotic checkpoint defect in comparison to respective single mutants	-	BIOGRID
247142	2542632	2541141	279086	277656	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC649.05	cdc25	cut12	sal2	stf1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Hudson JD (1991)	1819509	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:partial rescue|heat sensitivity:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247143	2542632	2541141	279086	277656	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC649.05	cdc25	cut12	sal2	stf1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Hudson JD (1990)	2245912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|heat sensitivity:undetermined|viability:partial rescue|viability:undetermined	cut12/cdc2 double mutants have an additive effect on the suppression of cdc25 mutant conditional lethality|genetic complex|mutations in cut12 rescue the temperature sensitivity of a cdc25 mutant	-	BIOGRID
247144	2542313	2540601	278779	277127	SPAC16A10.07c	SPBC29A3.14c	taz1	trt1	myb|myb1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nakamura TM (1998)	9774280	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance|mitotic recombination|telomere length	double mutants show an increase in the recombination mode of survival, normal telomere lengths and linear chromosomes	-	BIOGRID
247145	2539087	2538959	275659	275533	SPCC1259.13	SPCC18B5.11c	chk1	cds1	rad27	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Zeng Y (1998)	9774107	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	double mutants show a synergistic increase in the frequency of the cut phenotype	-	BIOGRID
247146	2538959	2539087	275533	275659	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC1259.13	cds1	chk1	-	rad27	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Zeng Y (1998)	9774107	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of chk1 partially rescues the sensitivity to HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423) seen in a cds1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
247147	2542161	2541141	278637	277656	SPAC1786.03	SPBC649.05	cut11	cut12	SPAC24C9.01	stf1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	West RR (1998)	9763447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247148	2542161	2540582	278637	277108	SPAC1786.03	SPBC26H8.07c	cut11	nda3	SPAC24C9.01	alp12|ben1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	West RR (1998)	9763447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247149	2540541	2539330	277068	275896	SPBC1A4.03c	SPCC1753.03c	top2	rec7	ptr11	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Hartsuiker E (1998)	9763441	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in M phase:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247150	2542255	2539920	278725	276464	SPAC57A7.08	SPBC119.08	pzh1	pmk1	phz1	spm1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Balcells L (1998)	9762918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	double mutants show increased sodium tolerance and aberrant plasma membrane flux activity	-	BIOGRID
247151	2541592	2540880	278089	277397	SPAC6F12.15c	SPBC582.03	cut9	cdc13	dre1	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Yamano H (1998)	9755167	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247152	2542438	2540880	278900	277397	SPAC17C9.01c	SPBC582.03	nuc2	cdc13	SPAC1851.01|apc3	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Yamano H (1998)	9755167	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247153	2542285	2540580	278753	277106	SPAC17H9.09c	SPBC19C2.05	ras1	ran1	ste5	pat1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Mach KE (1998)	9745019	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247157	2543577	2541620	279992	278117	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC2G11.12	srs2	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Maftahi M (2002)	12409469	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247158	2543577	2542749	279992	279199	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC15A10.03c	srs2	rad54	-	rhp54	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Maftahi M (2002)	12409469	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247159	2543407	2541213	279829	277727	SPAC8F11.07c	SPBC887.14c	cdc24	pfh1	-	pif1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tanaka H (2002)	12409464	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247163	2542274	2541059	278743	277574	SPAC1952.13	SPBC557.03c	ned1	pim1	-	dcd1|ptr2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Tange Y (2002)	12376568	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	TBZ (CID: 5430 CHEBI: 45979) hypersensitivity of the ned1 mutant was suppressed by introducing multiple copies of pim1 or spi1 genes	-	BIOGRID
247164	2542274	2540149	278743	276686	SPAC1952.13	SPBC1289.03c	ned1	spi1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Tange Y (2002)	12376568	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	TBZ (CID: 5430 CHEBI: 45979) hypersensitivity of the ned1 mutant was suppressed by introducing multiple copies of pim1 or spi1 genes	-	BIOGRID
247169	2540660	2540024	277185	276568	SPBC21.06c	SPBP4H10.04	cdc7	ppb1	its10|pld1	SPBC1346.01c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Lu Y (2002)	12354095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247170	2539149	2540024	275721	276568	SPCC1739.11c	SPBP4H10.04	cdc11	ppb1	-	SPBC1346.01c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Lu Y (2002)	12354095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247171	2540624	2540024	277150	276568	SPBC24C6.07	SPBP4H10.04	cdc14	ppb1	-	SPBC1346.01c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Lu Y (2002)	12354095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247172	2542761	2540024	279211	276568	SPAC1565.06c	SPBP4H10.04	spg1	ppb1	sid3	SPBC1346.01c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Lu Y (2002)	12354095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247173	2541599	2540024	278096	276568	SPAC24B11.11c	SPBP4H10.04	sid2	ppb1	-	SPBC1346.01c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Lu Y (2002)	12354095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247174	2540845	2540024	277362	276568	SPBC428.13c	SPBP4H10.04	mob1	ppb1	-	SPBC1346.01c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Lu Y (2002)	12354095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247175	2542358	2540660	278823	277185	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC21.06c	clp1	cdc7	flp1	its10|pld1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Cueille N (2001)	11683392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247176	2542358	2540845	278823	277362	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC428.13c	clp1	mob1	flp1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Cueille N (2001)	11683392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247177	2542358	2539149	278823	275721	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC1739.11c	clp1	cdc11	flp1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Cueille N (2001)	11683392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247178	2542358	2540624	278823	277150	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC24C6.07	clp1	cdc14	flp1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Cueille N (2001)	11683392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247179	2542358	2540650	278823	277175	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC244.01c	clp1	sid4	flp1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Cueille N (2001)	11683392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247180	2542358	2542761	278823	279211	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC1565.06c	clp1	spg1	flp1	sid3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Cueille N (2001)	11683392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247181	2542358	2541599	278823	278096	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC24B11.11c	clp1	sid2	flp1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Cueille N (2001)	11683392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247182	2542358	2542162	278823	278638	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC6F6.08c	clp1	cdc16	flp1	bub2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Cueille N (2001)	11683392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|heat sensitivity|septum formation	double mutants show abnormal cell shape at 25 degrees, no defects at 29 degrees and a multi-septate phenotype at 36 degrees	-	BIOGRID
247183	2540115	2542144	276652	278620	SPBC1778.02	SPAC6F6.17	rap1	rif1	-	SPAPJ736.01|tap1|tap11	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kanoh J (2001)	11676925	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	double mutants show elongated telomeres	-	BIOGRID
247184	2540630	2540719	277156	277242	SPBC25D12.03c	SPBC216.05	mcm7	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Liang DT (2001)	11606526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247185	2540630	2539087	277156	275659	SPBC25D12.03c	SPCC1259.13	mcm7	chk1	-	rad27	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Liang DT (2001)	11606526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247186	2540630	2538959	277156	275533	SPBC25D12.03c	SPCC18B5.11c	mcm7	cds1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Liang DT (2001)	11606526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247187	2540630	2540620	277156	277146	SPBC25D12.03c	SPBC4.04c	mcm7	mcm2	-	cdc19|nda1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Liang DT (2001)	11606526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247188	2540630	2539164	277156	275735	SPBC25D12.03c	SPCC16A11.17	mcm7	mcm4	-	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Liang DT (2001)	11606526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247189	2539164	2540630	275735	277156	SPCC16A11.17	SPBC25D12.03c	mcm4	mcm7	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Liang DT (2001)	11606526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247190	2540630	2540784	277156	277303	SPBC25D12.03c	SPBC211.04c	mcm7	mcm6	-	mis5	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Liang DT (2001)	11606526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247191	2540630	2541165	277156	277680	SPBC25D12.03c	SPBC776.12c	mcm7	hsk1	-	cdc7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Liang DT (2001)	11606526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247192	2540630	2541620	277156	278117	SPBC25D12.03c	SPAC2G11.12	mcm7	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Liang DT (2001)	11606526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247193	2539838	2540719	276387	277242	SPBC1347.10	SPBC216.05	cdc23	rad3	mcm10	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Liang DT (2001)	11606526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247194	2539838	2541165	276387	277680	SPBC1347.10	SPBC776.12c	cdc23	hsk1	mcm10	cdc7	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Liang DT (2001)	11606526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247195	2539838	2543281	276387	279708	SPBC1347.10	SPAC23C4.18c	cdc23	rad4	mcm10	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Liang DT (2001)	11606526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247196	2539838	2539164	276387	275735	SPBC1347.10	SPCC16A11.17	cdc23	mcm4	mcm10	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Liang DT (2001)	11606526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247197	2539164	2540620	275735	277146	SPCC16A11.17	SPBC4.04c	mcm4	mcm2	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	cdc19|nda1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Liang DT (2001)	11606526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247198	2539164	2540784	275735	277303	SPCC16A11.17	SPBC211.04c	mcm4	mcm6	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	mis5	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Liang DT (2001)	11606526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247199	2539164	2543281	275735	279708	SPCC16A11.17	SPAC23C4.18c	mcm4	rad4	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Liang DT (2001)	11606526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247200	2539164	2540470	275735	276998	SPCC16A11.17	SPBC29A10.15	mcm4	orc1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	cdc30|orp1|rid1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Liang DT (2001)	11606526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247201	2539164	2541620	275735	278117	SPCC16A11.17	SPAC2G11.12	mcm4	rqh1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Liang DT (2001)	11606526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247202	2541628	2539447	278124	276010	SPAC110.02	SPCC338.17c	pds5	rad21	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tanaka K (2001)	11598020	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247204	2539666	2541628	276221	278124	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC110.02	eso1	pds5	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tanaka K (2001)	11598020	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247205	2542667	2543682	279120	280096	SPAC26A3.16	SPAC637.10c	dph1	rpn10	ucp5	pus1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Wilkinson CR (2001)	11584278	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247206	2543682	2540481	280096	277009	SPAC637.10c	SPBC2D10.12	rpn10	rhp23	pus1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Wilkinson CR (2001)	11584278	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247207	2542558	2538760	279014	275343	SPAC1952.07	SPCC970.01	rad1	rad16	rad19	rad10|rad20|swi9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nasim A (1975)	166019	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|X ray resistance|resistance to chemicals	double mutants show increased sensitivity to UV and gamma radiation and DNA damaging agents	-	BIOGRID
247208	2539447	2543086	276010	279519	SPCC338.17c	SPAC30D11.10	rad21	rad52	-	rad22|rad22A	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nasim A (1975)	166019	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|gamma ray resistance	double mutants show increased sensitivity to UV and rad10	-	BIOGRID
247209	2542805	2540051	279253	276589	SPAC15A10.08	SPBC32H8.12c	ain1	act1	-	cps8|pi012	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Wu JQ (2001)	11294907	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247210	2542805	2539513	279253	276075	SPAC15A10.08	SPCC645.05c	ain1	myo2	-	rng5	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Wu JQ (2001)	11294907	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247211	2542805	2543526	279253	279944	SPAC15A10.08	SPAC4A8.15c	ain1	cdc3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Wu JQ (2001)	11294907	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247215	2543580	2543086	279995	279519	SPAC644.14c	SPAC30D11.10	rad51	rad52	rhp51	rad22|rad22A	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kim WJ (2001)	11292845	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247216	2539036	2540149	275609	276686	SPCC1840.01c	SPBC1289.03c	mog1	spi1	SPCC790.04c	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Tatebayashi K (2001)	11290708	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247217	2540821	2540825	277339	277343	SPBC800.03	SPBC428.08c	clr3	clr4	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nakayama  J (2001)	11283354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution|protein/peptide modification	double mutants show a loss of histone 3 methylation and swi6 localization	-	BIOGRID
247218	2539190	2539882	275761	276428	SPCC1259.15c	SPBC15D4.14	ubc11	taf73	ubcdp|ubcp4	taf5|taf5l	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Mitsuzawa H (2001)	11279037	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247219	2539190	2539353	275761	275919	SPCC1259.15c	SPCC5E4.03c	ubc11	taf5	ubcdp|ubcp4	taf72	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Mitsuzawa H (2001)	11279037	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247220	2541592	2539353	278089	275919	SPAC6F12.15c	SPCC5E4.03c	cut9	taf5	dre1	taf72	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Mitsuzawa H (2001)	11279037	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247221	2541592	2539882	278089	276428	SPAC6F12.15c	SPBC15D4.14	cut9	taf73	dre1	taf5|taf5l	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Mitsuzawa H (2001)	11279037	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247222	2542162	2540660	278638	277185	SPAC6F6.08c	SPBC21.06c	cdc16	cdc7	bub2	its10|pld1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fournier N (2001)	11271422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	mutation rescues the lethality of a cdc16 mutant at low temperatures	-	BIOGRID
247223	2542162	2542761	278638	279211	SPAC6F6.08c	SPAC1565.06c	cdc16	spg1	bub2	sid3	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fournier N (2001)	11271422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	mutation rescues the lethality of a cdc16 mutant at low temperatures	-	BIOGRID
247224	2542162	2542746	278638	279196	SPAC6F6.08c	SPAC9G1.09	cdc16	sid1	bub2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fournier N (2001)	11271422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	mutation rescues the lethality of a cdc16 mutant at low temperatures	-	BIOGRID
247225	2542162	2541599	278638	278096	SPAC6F6.08c	SPAC24B11.11c	cdc16	sid2	bub2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fournier N (2001)	11271422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	mutation rescues the lethality of a cdc16 mutant at low temperatures	-	BIOGRID
247226	2542162	2539149	278638	275721	SPAC6F6.08c	SPCC1739.11c	cdc16	cdc11	bub2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fournier N (2001)	11271422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	mutation rescues the lethality of a cdc16 mutant at low temperatures	-	BIOGRID
247227	2542162	2540624	278638	277150	SPAC6F6.08c	SPBC24C6.07	cdc16	cdc14	bub2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fournier N (2001)	11271422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	mutation rescues the lethality of a cdc16 mutant at low temperatures	-	BIOGRID
247228	2542162	2540845	278638	277362	SPAC6F6.08c	SPBC428.13c	cdc16	mob1	bub2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fournier N (2001)	11271422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	mutation rescues the lethality of a cdc16 mutant at low temperatures	-	BIOGRID
247229	2542746	2539149	279196	275721	SPAC9G1.09	SPCC1739.11c	sid1	cdc11	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fournier N (2001)	11271422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247230	2542746	2540624	279196	277150	SPAC9G1.09	SPBC24C6.07	sid1	cdc14	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fournier N (2001)	11271422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247231	2542746	2540660	279196	277185	SPAC9G1.09	SPBC21.06c	sid1	cdc7	-	its10|pld1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fournier N (2001)	11271422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247232	2542746	2540650	279196	277175	SPAC9G1.09	SPBC244.01c	sid1	sid4	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fournier N (2001)	11271422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247233	2542746	2541599	279196	278096	SPAC9G1.09	SPAC24B11.11c	sid1	sid2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fournier N (2001)	11271422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247234	2542162	2542409	278638	278873	SPAC6F6.08c	SPAC17G8.10c	cdc16	dma1	bub2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Fournier N (2001)	11271422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247235	2539087	2541849	275659	278340	SPCC1259.13	SPAC20G8.01	chk1	cdc17	rad27	SPAC57A10.13c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wan S (2001)	11270571	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247236	2539087	2539123	275659	275695	SPCC1259.13	SPCC18B5.03	chk1	wee1	rad27	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Wan S (2001)	11270571	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247237	2540885	2543666	277402	280080	SPBC660.14	SPAC644.06c	mik1	cdr1	-	nim1	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Wu L (1993)	8515818	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247238	2542632	2543666	279086	280080	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC644.06c	cdc25	cdr1	sal2	nim1	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Wu L (1993)	8515818	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247239	2540072	2539123	276610	275695	SPBC16H5.07c	SPCC18B5.03	ppa2	wee1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kinoshita N (1993)	8389306	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247240	2542632	2540072	279086	276610	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC16H5.07c	cdc25	ppa2	sal2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kinoshita N (1993)	8389306	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247241	2540234	2543281	276766	279708	SPBC336.12c	SPAC23C4.18c	cdc10	rad4	-	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Saka Y (1993)	8343962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	double mutants show a complete block in DNA synthesis	-	BIOGRID
247242	2540051	2542083	276589	278560	SPBC32H8.12c	SPAC27E2.05	act1	cdc1	cps8|pi012	mis1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ishiguro J (1993)	8292390	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247243	2540051	2539864	276589	276411	SPBC32H8.12c	SPBC16A3.15c	act1	nda2	cps8|pi012	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ishiguro J (1993)	8292390	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247245	2540580	2542558	277106	279014	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC1952.07	ran1	rad1	pat1	rad19	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Murakami H (1999)	10521402	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	deletion of rad1 allows pat1 mutants to undergo nuclear division in the presence of HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423)	-	BIOGRID
247246	2540580	2538959	277106	275533	SPBC19C2.05	SPCC18B5.11c	ran1	cds1	pat1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Murakami H (1999)	10521402	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	deletion of cds1 allows pat1 mutants to undergo nuclear division in the presence of HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423)	-	BIOGRID
247247	2543086	2540121	279519	276658	SPAC30D11.10	SPBC119.14	rad52	rti1	rad22|rad22A	rad22B	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Suto K (1999)	10512870	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue|mating type switching:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	rti1 suppressed the short UV and bleomycin sensitivities of mating type switch-inactive heterothallic rad22 disruptant (delta-rad22) cells as well as the lethality of the mating type switch-active homothallic  delta-rad22	-	BIOGRID
247248	2543086	2540121	279519	276658	SPAC30D11.10	SPBC119.14	rad52	rti1	rad22|rad22A	rad22B	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Suto K (1999)	10512870	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression|inviable	double mutants arrest before G2	-	BIOGRID
247249	2543086	2541158	279519	277673	SPAC30D11.10	SPBC660.13c	rad52	ssb1	rad22|rad22A	rad11|rpa1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Suto K (1999)	10512870	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show reduced restrictive temperature	-	BIOGRID
247250	2541158	2540121	277673	276658	SPBC660.13c	SPBC119.14	ssb1	rti1	rad11|rpa1	rad22B	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Suto K (1999)	10512870	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show reduced restrictive temperature	-	BIOGRID
247251	2543086	2541158	279519	277673	SPAC30D11.10	SPBC660.13c	rad52	ssb1	rad22|rad22A	rad11|rpa1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Suto K (1999)	10512870	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in S phase	double mutants arrest without completion of DNA synthesis	-	BIOGRID
247252	2541158	2540121	277673	276658	SPBC660.13c	SPBC119.14	ssb1	rti1	rad11|rpa1	rad22B	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Suto K (1999)	10512870	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Overexpression of rti1 suppressed the thermosensitivity of rad11-A1 cells	-	BIOGRID
247253	2542293	2539649	278761	276204	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC12D12.04c	pck1	pck2	SPAC22H10.01c	pkc1|sts6	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Arellano M (1999)	10504305	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247256	2540737	2542761	277260	279211	SPBC19G7.05c	SPAC1565.06c	bgs1	spg1	cps1|drc1	sid3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Le Goff X (1999)	10503548	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
247257	2540737	2540660	277260	277185	SPBC19G7.05c	SPBC21.06c	bgs1	cdc7	cps1|drc1	its10|pld1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Le Goff X (1999)	10503548	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
247258	2540737	2539123	277260	275695	SPBC19G7.05c	SPCC18B5.03	bgs1	wee1	cps1|drc1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Le Goff X (1999)	10503548	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation	double mutants show an increase in the formation of septa	-	BIOGRID
247259	2538816	2543112	275397	279544	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC3A12.07	rpb3	rpb11	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Mitobe J (1999)	10503538	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247260	2539881	2541620	276427	278117	SPBC16G5.12c	SPAC2G11.12	top3	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Goodwin A (1999)	10497270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247261	2539869	2539123	276415	275695	SPBC11B10.09	SPCC18B5.03	cdc2	wee1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Molz L (1989)	2474475	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247262	2540555	2539869	277082	276415	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC11B10.09	mcs2	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Molz L (1989)	2474475	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247263	2539869	2540555	276415	277082	SPBC11B10.09	SPBP16F5.02	cdc2	mcs2	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Molz L (1989)	2474475	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247264	2540471	2539869	276999	276415	SPBC19F8.07	SPBC11B10.09	mcs6	cdc2	cdk7|crk1|mop1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Molz L (1989)	2474475	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247265	2539869	2541871	276415	278361	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC22F3.09c	cdc2	res2	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	mcs1|pct1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Molz L (1989)	2474475	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247266	2539869	2541209	276415	277723	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC887.10	cdc2	mcs4	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Molz L (1989)	2474475	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247267	2539869	2540471	276415	276999	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC19F8.07	cdc2	mcs6	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	cdk7|crk1|mop1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Molz L (1989)	2474475	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247268	2540880	2540555	277397	277082	SPBC582.03	SPBP16F5.02	cdc13	mcs2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Molz L (1989)	2474475	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247269	2540880	2540471	277397	276999	SPBC582.03	SPBC19F8.07	cdc13	mcs6	-	cdk7|crk1|mop1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Molz L (1989)	2474475	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247270	2542632	2541871	279086	278361	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC22F3.09c	cdc25	res2	sal2	mcs1|pct1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Molz L (1989)	2474475	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247271	2542632	2541209	279086	277723	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC887.10	cdc25	mcs4	sal2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Molz L (1989)	2474475	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247272	2542497	2541720	278956	278214	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAC23H3.13c	plb1	gpa2	-	git8	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yang P (2003)	12715160	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247273	2542497	2538770	278956	275353	SPAC1A6.04c	SPCC1753.02c	plb1	git3	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yang P (2003)	12715160	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247274	2539504	2541925	276067	278413	SPCP31B10.03c	SPAC5D6.05	med31	med18	sep10|soh1	sep11|pmc6	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Szilagyi Z (2002)	12471453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247276	2543387	2540719	279809	277242	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC216.05	mcl1	rad3	slr3	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Williams DR (2002)	12455694	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247277	2543387	2540719	279809	277242	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC216.05	mcl1	rad3	slr3	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Williams DR (2005)	15643072	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247278	2543387	2543289	279809	279714	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC9E9.08	mcl1	rad26	slr3	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Williams DR (2002)	12455694	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247279	2543387	2538959	279809	275533	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC18B5.11c	mcl1	cds1	slr3	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Williams DR (2002)	12455694	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247280	2540345	2540679	276874	277204	SPBC19C7.09c	SPBC3D6.10	uve1	apn2	uvde	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Fraser JL (2003)	14599746	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency	-	-	BIOGRID
247281	2542337	2540361	278803	276890	SPAC16E8.09	SPBC2F12.13	scd1	klp5	ral1	sot1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Li Y (2003)	14573463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247282	2542337	2539700	278803	276253	SPAC16E8.09	SPBC1685.15c	scd1	klp6	ral1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Li Y (2003)	14573463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247283	2542337	2540361	278803	276890	SPAC16E8.09	SPBC2F12.13	scd1	klp5	ral1	sot1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Li Y (2003)	14573463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247284	2542337	2539700	278803	276253	SPAC16E8.09	SPBC1685.15c	scd1	klp6	ral1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Li Y (2003)	14573463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247285	2540361	2542285	276890	278753	SPBC2F12.13	SPAC17H9.09c	klp5	ras1	sot1	ste5	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Li Y (2003)	14573463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247287	2540361	2543027	276890	279463	SPBC2F12.13	SPAC110.03	klp5	cdc42	sot1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Li Y (2003)	14573463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247288	2540361	2539997	276890	276541	SPBC2F12.13	SPBC1604.14c	klp5	shk1	sot1	orb2|pak1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Li Y (2003)	14573463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247292	2539974	2542285	276518	278753	SPBC32H8.07	SPAC17H9.09c	git5	ras1	gpb1	ste5	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kim DU (1996)	8804400	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:wild type	co-disruption of the ras1 gene abolished the accelerated conjugation and sporulation phenotype of the gpb1 mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
247293	2543478	2541620	279898	278117	SPAC688.06c	SPAC2G11.12	slx4	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Coulon S (2004)	14528010	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247294	2541657	2541620	278153	278117	SPAP27G11.15	SPAC2G11.12	slx1	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Coulon S (2004)	14528010	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247295	2542380	2542285	278844	278753	SPAC17G6.04c	SPAC17H9.09c	cpp1	ras1	-	ste5	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yang W (2000)	10617635	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|cell shape:wild type|mating efficiency	Expression of Ras1 rescues the cpp1- morphological defects	-	BIOGRID
247297	2542438	2540307	278900	276837	SPAC17C9.01c	SPBC1A4.01	nuc2	apc10	SPAC1851.01|apc3	SPBC1E8.06	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Grishchuk EL (2000)	11033806	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of apc10 rescues growth of nuc2 at 32 degrees and in the presence of TPCK (CHEBI 9642 CID 439647)	-	BIOGRID
247298	2539237	2539997	275807	276541	SPCC24B10.13	SPBC1604.14c	skb5	shk1	-	orb2|pak1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yang P (1999)	10593886	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology:wild type|hyperosmotic stress resistance:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247299	2539237	2540099	275807	276637	SPCC24B10.13	SPBC16H5.11c	skb5	skb1	-	rmt5	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yang P (1999)	10593886	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology:wild type|hyperosmotic stress resistance:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247300	2539997	2539237	276541	275807	SPBC1604.14c	SPCC24B10.13	shk1	skb5	orb2|pak1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Yang P (1999)	10593886	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247304	2539004	2543670	275578	280084	SPCC4G3.05c	SPAPB1E7.06c	mus81	eme1	slx3	mms4|slx2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Doe CL (2002)	12084712	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to camptothecin (CHEBI 27656 CID 24360)	-	BIOGRID
247305	2539004	2540032	275578	276575	SPCC4G3.05c	SPBC1703.14c	mus81	top1	slx3	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Doe CL (2002)	12084712	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of top1 rescues the lethality caused by exposure to camptothecin (CHEBI 27656 CID 24360) seen in the single mutant	-	BIOGRID
247306	2541620	2540032	278117	276575	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC1703.14c	rqh1	top1	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Doe CL (2002)	12084712	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of top1 rescues the lethality caused by exposure to camptothecin (CHEBI 27656 CID 24360) seen in the single mutant	-	BIOGRID
247307	2539004	2541620	275578	278117	SPCC4G3.05c	SPAC2G11.12	mus81	rqh1	slx3	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Doe CL (2002)	12084712	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247308	2538959	2539087	275533	275659	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC1259.13	cds1	chk1	-	rad27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Francesconi S (2002)	12081644	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	double mutants show a complete loss of the DNA replication checkpoint	-	BIOGRID
247310	2540620	2539087	277146	275659	SPBC4.04c	SPCC1259.13	mcm2	chk1	cdc19|nda1	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Liang DT (1999)	9914167	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247311	2540620	2538959	277146	275533	SPBC4.04c	SPCC18B5.11c	mcm2	cds1	cdc19|nda1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Liang DT (1999)	9914167	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247313	2543412	2542337	279834	278803	SPAC637.07	SPAC16E8.09	moe1	scd1	-	ral1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Chen CR (1999)	9892665	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247314	2543412	2542285	279834	278753	SPAC637.07	SPAC17H9.09c	moe1	ras1	-	ste5	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Chen CR (1999)	9892665	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	text only	-	BIOGRID
247315	2543412	2541726	279834	278220	SPAC637.07	SPAC22H10.07	moe1	scd2	-	ral3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Chen CR (1999)	9892665	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247316	2543412	2543027	279834	279463	SPAC637.07	SPAC110.03	moe1	cdc42	-	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Chen CR (1999)	9892665	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247322	2543289	2542083	279714	278560	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC27E2.05	rad26	cdc1	-	mis1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247325	2543289	2540255	279714	276786	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC336.04	rad26	cdc6	-	mis10|pol3|pold	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247329	2543164	2541620	279595	278117	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC2G11.12	rad2	rqh1	fen1	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	data not shown	-	BIOGRID
247330	2543407	2542558	279829	279014	SPAC8F11.07c	SPAC1952.07	cdc24	rad1	-	rad19	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tanaka H (1999)	9891039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	-	-	BIOGRID
247331	2543407	2540426	279829	276954	SPAC8F11.07c	SPBC23E6.07c	cdc24	rfc1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Tanaka H (1999)	9891039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247332	2543407	2540020	279829	276564	SPAC8F11.07c	SPBC16D10.09	cdc24	pcn1	-	pcn	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Tanaka H (1999)	9891039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247333	2543407	2540718	279829	277241	SPAC8F11.07c	SPBC3H7.15	cdc24	hhp1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Tanaka H (1999)	9891039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247334	2543407	2540627	279829	277153	SPAC8F11.07c	SPBC25H2.13c	cdc24	cdc20	-	pol2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tanaka H (1999)	9891039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247335	2543407	2540620	279829	277146	SPAC8F11.07c	SPBC4.04c	cdc24	mcm2	-	cdc19|nda1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tanaka H (1999)	9891039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247336	2543407	2539164	279829	275735	SPAC8F11.07c	SPCC16A11.17	cdc24	mcm4	-	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tanaka H (1999)	9891039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247337	2543407	2539838	279829	276387	SPAC8F11.07c	SPBC1347.10	cdc24	cdc23	-	mcm10	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tanaka H (1999)	9891039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247338	2540348	2540695	276877	277219	SPBC29A10.05	SPBC19G7.01c	exo1	msh2	mut2	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rudolph C (1998)	9871115	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency	-	-	BIOGRID
247341	2538736	2541633	275320	278129	SPCC1322.12c	SPAC664.01c	bub1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bernard P (1998)	9864354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247342	2539627	2541908	276184	278398	SPBC1734.02c	SPAC23D3.02	cdc27	rfc2	SPBC337.18c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Reynolds N (1999)	9862966	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247343	2542632	2539123	279086	275695	SPAC24H6.05	SPCC18B5.03	cdc25	wee1	sal2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ogden JE (1986)	3442828	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:partial rescue	wee1 mutations block the cell cycle arrest caused by cdc25 mutations ultimately resulting in small cell size at time of division	-	BIOGRID
247346	2539869	2540027	276415	276571	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC1734.14c	cdc2	suc1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	p13	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Hayles J (1986)	3010051	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|mitotic cell cycle:partial rescue	suc1 rescues the cell cycle block of some cdc2 alleles although cells still show a slightly elongated phenotype	-	BIOGRID
247347	2542749	2541643	279199	278139	SPAC15A10.03c	SPAC14C4.13	rad54	rad17	rhp54	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Muris DF (1996)	8834792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247348	2542749	2539869	279199	276415	SPAC15A10.03c	SPBC11B10.09	rad54	cdc2	rhp54	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Muris DF (1996)	8834792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247349	2542749	2539087	279199	275659	SPAC15A10.03c	SPCC1259.13	rad54	chk1	rhp54	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Muris DF (1996)	8834792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247350	2542558	2541849	279014	278340	SPAC1952.07	SPAC20G8.01	rad1	cdc17	rad19	SPAC57A10.13c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kanter-Smoler G (1995)	8590806	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247351	2542558	2539123	279014	275695	SPAC1952.07	SPCC18B5.03	rad1	wee1	rad19	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kanter-Smoler G (1995)	8590806	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247352	2540555	2540471	277082	276999	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC19F8.07	mcs2	mcs6	-	cdk7|crk1|mop1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Buck V (1995)	8557037	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	Overexpression of crk1 rescues the growth defect mcs2/cdc2/cdc25 triple mutants	-	BIOGRID
247353	2539869	2540471	276415	276999	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC19F8.07	cdc2	mcs6	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	cdk7|crk1|mop1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Buck V (1995)	8557037	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	Overexpression of crk1 rescues the growth defect mcs2/cdc2/cdc25 triple mutants	-	BIOGRID
247354	2542632	2540471	279086	276999	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC19F8.07	cdc25	mcs6	sal2	cdk7|crk1|mop1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Buck V (1995)	8557037	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	Overexpression of crk1 rescues the growth defect mcs2/cdc2/cdc25 triple mutants	-	BIOGRID
247355	2540624	2542652	277150	279106	SPBC24C6.07	SPAC1687.15	cdc14	gsk3	-	skp1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Plyte SE (1996)	8524294	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247356	2542677	2541652	279130	278148	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC24B11.06c	pyp1	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Shiozaki K (1995)	7501024	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression through the G2/M phase transition:wild type|spore germination:wild type	expression of non-phosphorylated sty1 rescues the germination defect of a pyp1/pyp2 double mutant|genetic complex|mutation of sty1 rescues the G2/M delay caused by deletion or overexpression of pyp1 or pyp2	-	BIOGRID
247357	2542200	2541652	278675	278148	SPAC19D5.01	SPAC24B11.06c	pyp2	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Shiozaki K (1995)	7501024	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression through the G2/M phase transition:wild type|spore germination:wild type	expression of non-phosphorylated sty1 rescues the germination defect of a pyp1/pyp2 double mutant|genetic complex|mutation of sty1 rescues the G2/M delay caused by deletion or overexpression of pyp1 or pyp2	-	BIOGRID
247360	2541055	2541502	277570	278004	SPBC409.07c	SPAC23D3.04c	wis1	gpd2	smf2|spc2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Aiba H (1995)	7498541	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	osmotic stress resistance:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247361	2541055	2540455	277570	276983	SPBC409.07c	SPBC215.05	wis1	gpd1	smf2|spc2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Aiba H (1995)	7498541	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	osmotic stress resistance:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247362	2540128	2542632	276665	279086	SPBC15D4.03	SPAC24H6.05	slm9	cdc25	-	sal2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kanoh J (1998)	9843572	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression|vegetative growth	deletion of slm9 causes cell cycle arrest in a cdc25/wee1 mutant background|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
247363	2540128	2539123	276665	275695	SPBC15D4.03	SPCC18B5.03	slm9	wee1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kanoh J (1998)	9843572	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression|vegetative growth	deletion of slm9 causes cell cycle arrest in a cdc25/wee1 mutant background|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
247364	2541748	2539101	278242	275673	SPAC22E12.06c	SPCC736.04c	gmh3	gma12	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yoko-o T (1998)	9839953	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	double mutants show an additive defect in galactosyltransferase activity and a synergistic defect in galactosylation	-	BIOGRID
247365	2539645	2541619	276200	278116	SPBC146.07	SPAC27F1.09c	prp2	prp10	mis11|ods1|uaf1	sap155|SF3b155	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Habara Y (1998)	9837997	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247366	2542632	2539087	279086	275659	SPAC24H6.05	SPCC1259.13	cdc25	chk1	sal2	rad27	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Forbes KC (1998)	9832516	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of chk1 permitted growth of OPcdc25 in the presence of HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423)	-	BIOGRID
247367	2542632	2542029	279086	278511	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC8E11.02c	cdc25	rad24	sal2	anr5|sam4	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Forbes KC (1998)	9832516	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of rad24, rad25 or sum3 permitted growth of OPcdc25 in the presence of HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423)	-	BIOGRID
247368	2542632	2542252	279086	278722	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC17A2.13c	cdc25	rad25	sal2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Forbes KC (1998)	9832516	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of rad24, rad25 or sum3 permitted growth of OPcdc25 in the presence of HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423)	-	BIOGRID
247369	2542632	2538689	279086	275274	SPAC24H6.05	SPCC1795.11	cdc25	sum3	sal2	ded1|moc2|slh3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Forbes KC (1998)	9832516	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of rad24, rad25 or sum3 permitted growth of OPcdc25 in the presence of HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423)	-	BIOGRID
247370	2539869	2538689	276415	275274	SPBC11B10.09	SPCC1795.11	cdc2	sum3	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	ded1|moc2|slh3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Forbes KC (1998)	9832516	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of sum3 permitted growth of cdc2 mutants in the presence of HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423)	-	BIOGRID
247371	2538959	2542029	275533	278511	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC8E11.02c	cds1	rad24	-	anr5|sam4	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Forbes KC (1998)	9832516	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression	double mutants show increased defects in cell cycle checkpoints and increased incidence of the cut phenotype	-	BIOGRID
247372	2538959	2539087	275533	275659	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC1259.13	cds1	chk1	-	rad27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Forbes KC (1998)	9832516	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression	double mutants show increased defects in cell cycle checkpoints and increased incidence of the cut phenotype	-	BIOGRID
247373	2539864	2541847	276411	278338	SPBC16A3.15c	SPAC22H10.10	nda2	alp21	-	sto1	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Grishchuk EL (1999)	10341216	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247374	2538951	2541652	275525	278148	SPCC297.03	SPAC24B11.06c	ssp1	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Rupes I (1999)	10233158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression|cell shape|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247375	2542632	2539123	279086	275695	SPAC24H6.05	SPCC18B5.03	cdc25	wee1	sal2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rupes I (1999)	10233158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression	-	-	BIOGRID
247376	2543327	2540471	279750	276999	SPAC1D4.06c	SPBC19F8.07	csk1	mcs6	-	cdk7|crk1|mop1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lee KM (1999)	10226032	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression	-	-	BIOGRID
247379	2540511	2543514	277039	279932	SPBC1718.01	SPAC4D7.03	pop1	pop2	SPBC2G2.18|ste16	sud1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Wolf DA (1999)	10209119	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	-	-	BIOGRID
247380	2540866	2540761	277383	277281	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC21.04	sep1	med8	SPBC4C3.05	sep15	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Grallert A (1999)	10392445	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247381	2540761	2539123	277281	275695	SPBC21.04	SPCC18B5.03	med8	wee1	sep15	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Grallert A (1999)	10392445	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nuclear fusion during mating	double mutants show increased incidence of binucleate cells	-	BIOGRID
247382	2543233	2539244	279661	275814	SPAC630.03	SPCC1672.06c	arp3	asp1	act2	vip1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Feoktistova A (1999)	10388810	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247383	2543526	2539244	279944	275814	SPAC4A8.15c	SPCC1672.06c	cdc3	asp1	-	vip1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Feoktistova A (1999)	10388810	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247384	2540880	2540234	277397	276766	SPBC582.03	SPBC336.12c	cdc13	cdc10	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Snaith HA (1999)	10388806	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue|cellular morphology:partial rescue|chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247385	2540880	2540620	277397	277146	SPBC582.03	SPBC4.04c	cdc13	mcm2	-	cdc19|nda1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Snaith HA (1999)	10388806	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue|cellular morphology:partial rescue|chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247386	2540880	2539164	277397	275735	SPBC582.03	SPCC16A11.17	cdc13	mcm4	-	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Snaith HA (1999)	10388806	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue|cellular morphology:partial rescue|chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247387	2543481	2539640	279901	276195	SPAPB2B4.03	SPBC32F12.09	cig2	rum1	cyc17	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Snaith HA (1999)	10388806	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression|cell shape	genetic complex|overexpression of rum1 in a cig1/cig2 double mutant causes cell cycle arrest	-	BIOGRID
247388	2541770	2539781	278264	276331	SPAP27G11.10c	SPBC106.10	nup184	pka1	-	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Whalen WA (1999)	10388805	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247389	2543351	2541770	279773	278264	SPAC8C9.03	SPAP27G11.10c	cgs1	nup184	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Whalen WA (1999)	10388805	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247390	2541699	2540051	278195	276589	SPAP8A3.08	SPBC32H8.12c	cdc4	act1	-	cps8|pi012	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	McCollum D (1999)	10371213	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247391	2541603	2540051	278100	276589	SPAC1F5.04c	SPBC32H8.12c	cdc12	act1	-	cps8|pi012	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	McCollum D (1999)	10371213	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247393	2540051	2541940	276589	278427	SPBC32H8.12c	SPAC27F1.02c	act1	cdc8	cps8|pi012	fus4	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	McCollum D (1999)	10371213	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247394	2541699	2540051	278195	276589	SPAP8A3.08	SPBC32H8.12c	cdc4	act1	-	cps8|pi012	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	McCollum D (1999)	10371213	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247395	2540024	2539920	276568	276464	SPBP4H10.04	SPBC119.08	ppb1	pmk1	SPBC1346.01c	spm1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sugiura R (1999)	10365961	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247397	2540024	2542175	276568	278650	SPBP4H10.04	SPAC1F3.02c	ppb1	mkh1	SPBC1346.01c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sugiura R (1999)	10365961	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247403	2539659	2543589	276214	280004	SPBC146.13c	SPAC4F10.15c	myo1	wsp1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Lee WL (2000)	11076964	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247404	2539741	2541770	276293	278264	SPBC16A3.05c	SPAP27G11.10c	rae1	nup184	cut21	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yoon JH (2000)	11073978	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247405	2539741	2540727	276293	277250	SPBC16A3.05c	SPBC1921.03c	rae1	mex67	cut21	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Yoon JH (2000)	11073978	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247406	2540727	2539741	277250	276293	SPBC1921.03c	SPBC16A3.05c	mex67	rae1	-	cut21	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yoon JH (2000)	11073978	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247407	2540727	2541770	277250	278264	SPBC1921.03c	SPAP27G11.10c	mex67	nup184	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yoon JH (2000)	11073978	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247408	2540727	2539077	277250	275649	SPBC1921.03c	SPCC1739.14	mex67	npp106	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yoon JH (2000)	11073978	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247409	2539087	2539004	275659	275578	SPCC1259.13	SPCC4G3.05c	chk1	mus81	rad27	slx3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Boddy MN (2000)	11073977	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	double mutants show decreased survival in response to UV radiation	-	BIOGRID
247410	2539087	2538959	275659	275533	SPCC1259.13	SPCC18B5.11c	chk1	cds1	rad27	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Boddy MN (2000)	11073977	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	double mutants show decreased survival in response to UV radiation	-	BIOGRID
247411	2539004	2541051	275578	277566	SPCC4G3.05c	SPBC3E7.08c	mus81	rad13	slx3	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Boddy MN (2000)	11073977	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	double mutants show decreased survival in response to UV radiation	-	BIOGRID
247412	2539004	2540345	275578	276874	SPCC4G3.05c	SPBC19C7.09c	mus81	uve1	slx3	uvde	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Boddy MN (2000)	11073977	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	double mutants show decreased survival in response to UV radiation	-	BIOGRID
247413	2543222	3361180	279650	280256	SPAC821.08c	SPBPB8B6.04c	slp1	grt1	cdc20	SPAPB8B6.04c|SPAP8B6.04c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yamada HY (2000)	11058086	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247414	2543222	2539123	279650	275695	SPAC821.08c	SPCC18B5.03	slp1	wee1	cdc20	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Yamada HY (2000)	11058086	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247415	2543222	2542824	279650	279271	SPAC821.08c	SPAC144.13c	slp1	srw1	cdc20	ste9	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Yamada HY (2000)	11058086	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247417	2543086	2540887	279519	277404	SPAC30D11.10	SPBC4F6.15c	rad52	swi10	rad22|rad22A	rad23	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Osman F (2000)	11057444	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|heat sensitivity|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to heat, MMS (CID 4156 CHEBI 25255) and UV	-	BIOGRID
247418	2543086	2538860	279519	275440	SPAC30D11.10	SPCC330.01c	rad52	rhp16	rad22|rad22A	SPCC613.13c|rad16	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Osman F (2000)	11057444	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to heat and UV	-	BIOGRID
247419	2543545	2539513	279962	276075	SPAC926.03	SPCC645.05c	rlc1	myo2	-	rng5	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Naqvi NI (2000)	11056543	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology:wild type|cold sensitivity:wild type|cytokinesis:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	rlc1 mutant cells expressing Myo2p(IQ2) as their sole Myo2p source resembled wild-type cells in morphology and growth rate, and were capable of proper cytokinesis and colony formation at 19 degrees	-	BIOGRID
247420	2542337	2540771	278803	277291	SPAC16E8.09	SPBC21B10.04c	scd1	nrf1	ral1	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Murray JM (2001)	11042180	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	text only	-	BIOGRID
247421	2542337	2543027	278803	279463	SPAC16E8.09	SPAC110.03	scd1	cdc42	ral1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Murray JM (2001)	11042180	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	endocytosis:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247422	2542677	2542200	279130	278675	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC19D5.01	pyp1	pyp2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ottilie S (1992)	1448087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247423	2542677	2539123	279130	275695	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC18B5.03	pyp1	wee1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ottilie S (1992)	1448087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:partial rescue	expression of a temperature sensitive wee1 allele suppresses the cell elongation phenotype caused by overexpression of pyp1 or pyp2	-	BIOGRID
247424	2542677	2539869	279130	276415	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC11B10.09	pyp1	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ottilie S (1992)	1448087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:partial rescue	expression of the cdc2-1w allele suppresses the cell elongation phenotype caused by overexpression of pyp1 or pyp2	-	BIOGRID
247425	2542200	2539123	278675	275695	SPAC19D5.01	SPCC18B5.03	pyp2	wee1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ottilie S (1992)	1448087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:partial rescue	expression of a temperature sensitive wee1 allele suppresses the cell elongation phenotype caused by overexpression of pyp1 or pyp2	-	BIOGRID
247426	2542200	2539869	278675	276415	SPAC19D5.01	SPBC11B10.09	pyp2	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ottilie S (1992)	1448087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:partial rescue	expression of the cdc2-1w allele suppresses the cell elongation phenotype caused by overexpression of pyp1 or pyp2	-	BIOGRID
247427	2542632	2542677	279086	279130	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC26F1.10c	cdc25	pyp1	sal2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ottilie S (1992)	1448087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|mitotic cell cycle:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247428	3361487	2542140	280563	278616	SPAC1805.17	SPAC1783.07c	crm1	pap1	SPAC1B2.01|caf2	caf3	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Toda T (1992)	1448080	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247429	2541863	2540825	278353	277343	SPAC22E12.07	SPBC428.08c	rna1	clr4	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kusano A (2004)	15317843	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:partial rescue|heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247430	2541863	2541531	278353	278031	SPAC22E12.07	SPAC25A8.01c	rna1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kusano A (2004)	15317843	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:partial rescue|heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247431	2541863	2540825	278353	277343	SPAC22E12.07	SPBC428.08c	rna1	clr4	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kusano A (2004)	15317843	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247432	2539933	2539135	276477	275707	SPBC17D11.06	SPCC553.09c	spp2	spb70	pri2	pol12	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Uchiyama M (2004)	15314153	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247433	2540470	2539135	276998	275707	SPBC29A10.15	SPCC553.09c	orc1	spb70	cdc30|orp1|rid1	pol12	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Uchiyama M (2004)	15314153	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247434	2543407	2541213	279829	277727	SPAC8F11.07c	SPBC887.14c	cdc24	pfh1	-	pif1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ryu GH (2004)	15302919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247435	2540148	2541213	276685	277727	SPBC16D10.04c	SPBC887.14c	dna2	pfh1	-	pif1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ryu GH (2004)	15302919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247436	2541213	2540255	277727	276786	SPBC887.14c	SPBC336.04	pfh1	cdc6	pif1	mis10|pol3|pold	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ryu GH (2004)	15302919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247437	2541213	2539627	277727	276184	SPBC887.14c	SPBC1734.02c	pfh1	cdc27	pif1	SPBC337.18c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ryu GH (2004)	15302919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247444	2542266	2541165	278735	277680	SPAC17D4.02	SPBC776.12c	cdc45	hsk1	goa1|sna41	cdc7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dolan WP (2004)	15338237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show a lower restrictive temperature	-	BIOGRID
247449	2540392	2540223	276920	276756	SPBC365.15	SPBC32F12.04	alp4	gtb1	-	tug1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tange Y (2004)	15280226	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247450	2540223	2540936	276756	277452	SPBC32F12.04	SPBC800.05c	gtb1	atb2	tug1	alp2|ban5|tub1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tange Y (2004)	15280226	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytoskeleton morphology:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247451	2540223	2540361	276756	276890	SPBC32F12.04	SPBC2F12.13	gtb1	klp5	tug1	sot1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tange Y (2004)	15280226	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247452	2540223	2539700	276756	276253	SPBC32F12.04	SPBC1685.15c	gtb1	klp6	tug1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tange Y (2004)	15280226	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247453	2540223	2539505	276756	276068	SPBC32F12.04	SPCC736.14	gtb1	dis1	tug1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tange Y (2004)	15280226	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247455	2542358	2542632	278823	279086	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC24H6.05	clp1	cdc25	flp1	sal2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Mishra M (2004)	15265986	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation	clp1/cdc25 mutant cells formed fragmented, incomplete septa that were unable to divide the cell into two	-	BIOGRID
247456	2540329	2542140	276859	278616	SPBC29B5.01	SPAC1783.07c	atf1	pap1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	caf3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Madrid M (2004)	15247218	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|oxidative stress resistance	-	-	BIOGRID
247461	2540719	2539209	277242	275779	SPBC216.05	SPCC23B6.03c	rad3	tel1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nakamura TM (2004)	15226425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	-	-	BIOGRID
247462	2539499	2542226	276062	278699	SPCC622.08c	SPAC19G12.06c	hta1	hta2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakamura TM (2004)	15226425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247475	2543240	2538959	279668	275533	SPAC694.06c	SPCC18B5.11c	mrc1	cds1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nakamura TM (2004)	15226425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247478	2543240	2539499	279668	276062	SPAC694.06c	SPCC622.08c	mrc1	hta1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakamura TM (2004)	15226425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247479	2543240	2542226	279668	278699	SPAC694.06c	SPAC19G12.06c	mrc1	hta2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakamura TM (2004)	15226425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247480	2538959	2539499	275533	276062	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC622.08c	cds1	hta1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakamura TM (2004)	15226425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247481	2538959	2542226	275533	278699	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC19G12.06c	cds1	hta2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakamura TM (2004)	15226425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247482	2541620	2539087	278117	275659	SPAC2G11.12	SPCC1259.13	rqh1	chk1	hus2|rad12|rec9	rad27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nakamura TM (2004)	15226425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
247483	2540329	2539403	276859	275968	SPBC29B5.01	SPCC736.11	atf1	ago1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	csp9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Jia S (2004)	15218150	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution|protein/peptide modification|silencing	double mutants show a loss of maintenance of heterochromatin resulting in a striking decrease in the silencing of the ura4+ reporter, which correlated with significant reduction in histone H3-K9 methylation levels and Swi6 localization	-	BIOGRID
247484	2540329	2538930	276859	275506	SPBC29B5.01	SPCC188.13c	atf1	dcr1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	SPCC584.10c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Jia S (2004)	15218150	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution|protein/peptide modification|silencing	double mutants show a loss of maintenance of heterochromatin resulting in a striking decrease in the silencing of the ura4+ reporter, which correlated with significant reduction in histone H3-K9 methylation levels and Swi6 localization	-	BIOGRID
247485	2540329	2542539	276859	278996	SPBC29B5.01	SPAC1B1.01	atf1	deb1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	rdp1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Jia S (2004)	15218150	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution|protein/peptide modification|silencing	double mutants show a loss of maintenance of heterochromatin resulting in a striking decrease in the silencing of the ura4+ reporter, which correlated with significant reduction in histone H3-K9 methylation levels and Swi6 localization	-	BIOGRID
247486	2542047	2539403	278528	275968	SPAC21E11.03c	SPCC736.11	pcr1	ago1	mts2	csp9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Jia S (2004)	15218150	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution|protein/peptide modification|silencing	double mutants show a loss of maintenance of heterochromatin resulting in a striking decrease in the silencing of the ura4+ reporter, which correlated with significant reduction in histone H3-K9 methylation levels and Swi6 localization	-	BIOGRID
247487	2542047	2538930	278528	275506	SPAC21E11.03c	SPCC188.13c	pcr1	dcr1	mts2	SPCC584.10c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Jia S (2004)	15218150	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution|protein/peptide modification|silencing	double mutants show a loss of maintenance of heterochromatin resulting in a striking decrease in the silencing of the ura4+ reporter, which correlated with significant reduction in histone H3-K9 methylation levels and Swi6 localization	-	BIOGRID
247488	2542047	2542539	278528	278996	SPAC21E11.03c	SPAC1B1.01	pcr1	deb1	mts2	rdp1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Jia S (2004)	15218150	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution|protein/peptide modification|silencing	double mutants show a loss of maintenance of heterochromatin resulting in a striking decrease in the silencing of the ura4+ reporter, which correlated with significant reduction in histone H3-K9 methylation levels and Swi6 localization	-	BIOGRID
247489	2542548	2541643	279005	278139	SPAC13A11.03	SPAC14C4.13	mcp7	rad17	mug32|mnd1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Saito TT (2004)	15210864	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247490	2542548	3361533	279005	280609	SPAC13A11.03	SPAC222.15	mcp7	meu13	mug32|mnd1	SPAC821.01	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Saito TT (2004)	15210864	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	budding	-	-	BIOGRID
247491	2542548	2541643	279005	278139	SPAC13A11.03	SPAC14C4.13	mcp7	rad17	mug32|mnd1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Saito TT (2004)	15210864	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic recombination	-	-	BIOGRID
247492	2541661	2540866	278157	277383	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC4C3.12	ace2	sep1	-	SPBC4C3.05	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Dekker N (2004)	15194814	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation	double mutants sediment slightly faster than the single mutants	-	BIOGRID
247493	3361560	2543379	280636	279801	SPAC14C4.09	SPAC821.09	agn1	eng1	SPAC14C4.09	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Dekker N (2004)	15194814	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation	double mutants form longer cell chains and sediment faster	-	BIOGRID
247494	2540620	2539640	277146	276195	SPBC4.04c	SPBC32F12.09	mcm2	rum1	cdc19|nda1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yamada Y (2004)	15194812	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247496	2542477	2542266	278937	278735	SPAC1B2.05	SPAC17D4.02	mcm5	cdc45	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	goa1|sna41	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Yamada Y (2004)	15194812	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	The sna41-928/cdc45 mutation suppressed the growth defect of mcm5 mutant at 25 degrees	-	BIOGRID
247497	2540810	2541055	277329	277570	SPBC19C7.03	SPBC409.07c	cyr1	wis1	git2	smf2|spc2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Stiefel J (2004)	15189983	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	mutations in cgs1, spc1 or wis1 suppress the sensitivity to 5-FOA (CID 69711) of a cyr1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
247498	2540810	2541652	277329	278148	SPBC19C7.03	SPAC24B11.06c	cyr1	sty1	git2	phh1|spc1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Stiefel J (2004)	15189983	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	mutations in cgs1, spc1 or wis1 suppress the sensitivity to 5-FOA (CID 69711) of a cyr1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
247500	2543444	2539552	279864	276113	SPAC458.05	SPCPJ732.01	pik3	vps5	vps34	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Koga T (2004)	15189449	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247501	2543444	2543324	279864	279747	SPAC458.05	SPAPJ696.01c	pik3	vps17	vps34	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Koga T (2004)	15189449	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247502	2539487	2539047	276050	275620	SPCC895.05	SPCC1223.06	for3	tea1	-	alp8	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Feierbach B (2004)	15184402	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247508	2541652	2542861	278148	279307	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC13G7.13c	sty1	msa1	phh1|spc1	SPAC6C3.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Jeong HT (2004)	15166138	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247509	2542285	2542861	278753	279307	SPAC17H9.09c	SPAC13G7.13c	ras1	msa1	ste5	SPAC6C3.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Jeong HT (2004)	15166138	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247510	2541755	2542861	278249	279307	SPAC2F7.11	SPAC13G7.13c	nrd1	msa1	msa2	SPAC6C3.01c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Jeong HT (2004)	15166138	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency	-	-	BIOGRID
247511	2540580	2540258	277106	276789	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC32C12.02	ran1	ste11	pat1	aff1|stex	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sipiczki M (1988)	3185514	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	the ste11 mutant rescues pat-114 provoked haploid sporulation and growth arrest	-	BIOGRID
247512	2542285	2542137	278753	278613	SPAC17H9.09c	SPAC1D4.13	ras1	byr1	ste5	ste1|ste3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nadin-Davis SA (1988)	3042386	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247514	2539639	2540589	276194	277115	SPBC106.09	SPBC20F10.06	cut4	mad2	apc1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kim SH (1998)	9461438	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247515	2541592	2543222	278089	279650	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC821.08c	cut9	slp1	dre1	cdc20	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kim SH (1998)	9461438	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247516	2539639	2543222	276194	279650	SPBC106.09	SPAC821.08c	cut4	slp1	apc1	cdc20	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kim SH (1998)	9461438	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247520	2542988	2542873	279426	279318	SPAC1006.09	SPAC9G1.02	win1	wis4	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	wak1|wik1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Shieh JC (1998)	9450957	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247521	2540880	2543481	277397	279901	SPBC582.03	SPAPB2B4.03	cdc13	cig2	-	cyc17	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Lopez-Girona A (1998)	9436991	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue	overexpression of cig2 rescues the DNA re-replication defect caused by deletion of cdc13	-	BIOGRID
247522	2540234	2542773	276766	279222	SPBC336.12c	SPAC16.01	cdc10	rho2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Hirata D (1998)	9405296	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:wild type|cell size:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247523	2543544	2538959	279961	275533	SPAC664.07c	SPCC18B5.11c	rad9	cds1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Furuya K (2004)	15155581	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247524	2538959	2539087	275533	275659	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC1259.13	cds1	chk1	-	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Furuya K (2004)	15155581	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247525	2540917	2540244	277433	276776	SPBC409.05	SPBC336.01	skp1	fbh1	psh1|sph1	fdh|fdh1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lehmann A (2004)	15147268	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	-	-	BIOGRID
247526	2540917	2540719	277433	277242	SPBC409.05	SPBC216.05	skp1	rad3	psh1|sph1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Lehmann A (2004)	15147268	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247527	2540917	2539087	277433	275659	SPBC409.05	SPCC1259.13	skp1	chk1	psh1|sph1	rad27	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Lehmann A (2004)	15147268	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247529	2538736	2540737	275320	277260	SPCC1322.12c	SPBC19G7.05c	bub1	bgs1	-	cps1|drc1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tournier S (2004)	15146064	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spindle morphology	-	-	BIOGRID
247530	2542358	2542632	278823	279086	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC24H6.05	clp1	cdc25	flp1	sal2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Esteban V (2004)	15128870	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247533	2542537	2539741	278994	276293	SPAC19D5.04	SPBC16A3.05c	ptr1	rae1	-	cut21	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Andoh T (2004)	15094387	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247534	2541849	2541710	278340	278205	SPAC20G8.01	SPAC343.11c	cdc17	msc1	SPAC57A10.13c	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ahmed S (2004)	15082762	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	genetic complex|overexpression of MSC1 rescues growth in a temperature sensitive CDC17/CHK1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
247535	2539087	2541710	275659	278205	SPCC1259.13	SPAC343.11c	chk1	msc1	rad27	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ahmed S (2004)	15082762	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue|heat sensitivity:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	genetic complex|overexpression of MSC1 rescues growth in a temperature sensitive CDC17/CHK1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
247536	2541592	2539447	278089	276010	SPAC6F12.15c	SPCC338.17c	cut9	rad21	dre1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tatebayashi K (1998)	9475720	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247537	2540866	2539869	277383	276415	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC11B10.09	sep1	cdc2	SPBC4C3.05	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Grallert A (1998)	9473044	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nuclear morphology	sep1/cdc2-1w double mutants show an increased incidence of binucleate cells	-	BIOGRID
247538	2540866	2539123	277383	275695	SPBC4C3.12	SPCC18B5.03	sep1	wee1	SPBC4C3.05	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Grallert A (1998)	9473044	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nuclear morphology	double mutants show an increased incidence of binucleate cells	-	BIOGRID
247539	2539123	2542632	275695	279086	SPCC18B5.03	SPAC24H6.05	wee1	cdc25	-	sal2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Grallert A (1998)	9473044	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nuclear morphology:wild type|septum formation:wild type	Inactivation of cdc25 restores normal septation in sep1/wee1 mutant cells|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
247540	2540866	2542632	277383	279086	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC24H6.05	sep1	cdc25	SPBC4C3.05	sal2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Grallert A (1998)	9473044	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nuclear morphology:wild type|septum formation:wild type	Inactivation of cdc25 restores normal septation in sep1/wee1 mutant cells|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
247541	2543576	2540051	279991	276589	SPAC4A8.05c	SPBC32H8.12c	myp2	act1	myo3	cps8|pi012	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Motegi F (1997)	9459302	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247542	2543576	2541940	279991	278427	SPAC4A8.05c	SPAC27F1.02c	myp2	cdc8	myo3	fus4	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Motegi F (1997)	9459302	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247543	2543289	2538959	279714	275533	SPAC9E9.08	SPCC18B5.11c	rad26	cds1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Lindsay HD (1998)	9450932	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance|resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
247544	2539312	2539818	275879	276368	SPCC777.14	SPBC11C11.08	prp4	srp1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Gross T (1998)	9421507	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA modification:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	overexpression of Srp1 suppress the pre-mRNA splicing defect of the temperature-sensitive prp4-73 allele	-	BIOGRID
247545	2540992	2539087	277508	275659	SPBC342.05	SPCC1259.13	crb2	chk1	rhp9	rad27	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Saka Y (1997)	9407031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247546	2543281	2540992	279708	277508	SPAC23C4.18c	SPBC342.05	rad4	crb2	cut5|dpb11|dre3	rhp9	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Saka Y (1997)	9407031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247547	2540620	2540013	277146	276557	SPBC4.04c	SPBC14C8.07c	mcm2	cdc18	cdc19|nda1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Forsburg SL (1997)	9383050	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247548	2540620	2542083	277146	278560	SPBC4.04c	SPAC27E2.05	mcm2	cdc1	cdc19|nda1	mis1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Forsburg SL (1997)	9383050	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247549	2540620	2540255	277146	276786	SPBC4.04c	SPBC336.04	mcm2	cdc6	cdc19|nda1	mis10|pol3|pold	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Forsburg SL (1997)	9383050	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247551	2542344	2540810	278810	277329	SPAC1751.01c	SPBC19C7.03	gti1	cyr1	-	git2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Caspari T (1997)	9372449	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient uptake	-	-	BIOGRID
247552	2540234	2540341	276766	276870	SPBC336.12c	SPBC2F12.11c	cdc10	rep2	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nakashima N (1995)	7588609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247553	2543666	2539869	280080	276415	SPAC644.06c	SPBC11B10.09	cdr1	cdc2	nim1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Feilotter H (1991)	2004705	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	double mutants show elongated cell shapes	-	BIOGRID
247554	2543666	2540880	280080	277397	SPAC644.06c	SPBC582.03	cdr1	cdc13	nim1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Feilotter H (1991)	2004705	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	double mutants show elongated cell shapes	-	BIOGRID
247555	2543666	2542632	280080	279086	SPAC644.06c	SPAC24H6.05	cdr1	cdc25	nim1	sal2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Feilotter H (1991)	2004705	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	double mutants show elongated cell shapes	-	BIOGRID
247557	2540885	2539123	277402	275695	SPBC660.14	SPCC18B5.03	mik1	wee1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Lundgren K (1991)	1706223	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247564	2540470	2539869	276998	276415	SPBC29A10.15	SPBC11B10.09	orc1	cdc2	cdc30|orp1|rid1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Synnes M (2002)	12186947	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	double mutants show an enhanced cutting phenotype with earlier entry into mitosis	-	BIOGRID
247565	2540470	2539123	276998	275695	SPBC29A10.15	SPCC18B5.03	orc1	wee1	cdc30|orp1|rid1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Synnes M (2002)	12186947	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	double mutants show an enhanced cutting phenotype with earlier entry into mitosis	-	BIOGRID
247566	2539838	2540620	276387	277146	SPBC1347.10	SPBC4.04c	cdc23	mcm2	mcm10	cdc19|nda1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Hart EA (2002)	12185500	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247567	2539838	2540784	276387	277303	SPBC1347.10	SPBC211.04c	cdc23	mcm6	mcm10	mis5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Hart EA (2002)	12185500	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247568	2539838	2539164	276387	275735	SPBC1347.10	SPCC16A11.17	cdc23	mcm4	mcm10	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Hart EA (2002)	12185500	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247569	2539838	2542477	276387	278937	SPBC1347.10	SPAC1B2.05	cdc23	mcm5	mcm10	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Hart EA (2002)	12185500	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247570	2542477	2539838	278937	276387	SPAC1B2.05	SPBC1347.10	mcm5	cdc23	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	mcm10	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Hart EA (2002)	12185500	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247571	2542219	2540024	278693	276568	SPAC18G6.03	SPBP4H10.04	ypt3	ppb1	-	SPBC1346.01c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Cheng H (2002)	12181359	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247572	2539741	2541770	276293	278264	SPBC16A3.05c	SPAP27G11.10c	rae1	nup184	cut21	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Thakurta AG (2002)	12181330	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247573	2539741	3361521	276293	280597	SPBC16A3.05c	SPAC1610.03c	rae1	crp79	cut21	meu5	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Thakurta AG (2002)	12181330	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type|viability:wild type	crp79 rescues the growth and mRNA export defects seen in a rae1/nup184 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
247574	2541770	3361521	278264	280597	SPAP27G11.10c	SPAC1610.03c	nup184	crp79	-	meu5	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Thakurta AG (2002)	12181330	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type|viability:wild type	crp79 rescues the growth and mRNA export defects seen in a rae1/nup184 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
247575	2541089	2541869	277604	278359	SPBC646.09c	SPAC22F3.13	int6	tsc1	yin6	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Matsumoto S (2002)	12136010	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	auxotrophy|vegetative growth	tsc1 int6 leu1-32 triple mutant has decreased growth on leucine-supplemented (low concentration) minimal media	-	BIOGRID
247576	2541089	2543339	277604	279762	SPBC646.09c	SPAC630.13c	int6	tsc2	yin6	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Matsumoto S (2002)	12136010	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	auxotrophy|vegetative growth	tsc2 int6 leu1-32 triple mutant has decreased growth on leucine-supplemented (low concentration) minimal media	-	BIOGRID
247577	2540024	2543576	276568	279991	SPBP4H10.04	SPAC4A8.05c	ppb1	myp2	SPBC1346.01c	myo3	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fujita M (2002)	12136004	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	Overexpression of truncated PPB1 rescues growth of MYO3 mutants in high MgCl2 media	-	BIOGRID
247578	2542558	2541982	279014	278467	SPAC1952.07	SPAC23A1.06c	rad1	cmk2	rad19	mkp2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Alemany V (2002)	12135745	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247580	2542632	2541982	279086	278467	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC23A1.06c	cdc25	cmk2	sal2	mkp2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Alemany V (2002)	12135745	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247582	2539309	2540392	275876	276920	SPCC4G3.19	SPBC365.15	alp16	alp4	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fujita A (2002)	12134075	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247583	2539309	2540690	275876	277215	SPCC4G3.19	SPBC428.20c	alp16	alp6	-	SPBC902.01c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fujita A (2002)	12134075	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247588	2542285	2539958	278753	276502	SPAC17H9.09c	SPBC1718.07c	ras1	zfs1	ste5	moc4	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kanoh J (1995)	8534915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue|mating response:partial rescue	deletion of zfs1 suppresses the excessive mating response and poor mating efficiency caused by expression of a ras-val17 mutant	-	BIOGRID
247589	2539869	2539640	276415	276195	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC32F12.09	cdc2	rum1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Labib K (1995)	7593289	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression	-	-	BIOGRID
247593	2540025	2542632	276569	279086	SPBC16G5.01	SPAC24H6.05	rpn12	cdc25	SPBC342.07|mts3	sal2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gordon C (1996)	8621436	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247594	2540013	2539640	276557	276195	SPBC14C8.07c	SPBC32F12.09	cdc18	rum1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Jallepalli PV (1996)	8598285	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247595	2540013	2539640	276557	276195	SPBC14C8.07c	SPBC32F12.09	cdc18	rum1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Jallepalli PV (1996)	8598285	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247596	2539497	2539505	276060	276068	SPCC895.07	SPCC736.14	alp14	dis1	mtc1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nakaseko Y (2001)	11369198	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytoskeleton morphology:undetermined|heat sensitivity:undetermined	overexpression of dis1 stabilizes microtubules and rescues sensitivity to temperature in an alp14 mutant	-	BIOGRID
247597	2539497	2540494	276060	277022	SPCC895.07	SPBC409.04c	alp14	mis12	mtc1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Nakaseko Y (2001)	11369198	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247598	2541165	2540620	277680	277146	SPBC776.12c	SPBC4.04c	hsk1	mcm2	cdc7	cdc19|nda1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Takeda T (2001)	11359920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247599	2541165	2539164	277680	275735	SPBC776.12c	SPCC16A11.17	hsk1	mcm4	cdc7	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Takeda T (2001)	11359920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247600	2541165	2540719	277680	277242	SPBC776.12c	SPBC216.05	hsk1	rad3	cdc7	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Takeda T (2001)	11359920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247601	2541165	2538959	277680	275533	SPBC776.12c	SPCC18B5.11c	hsk1	cds1	cdc7	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Takeda T (2001)	11359920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247602	2541165	2539447	277680	276010	SPBC776.12c	SPCC338.17c	hsk1	rad21	cdc7	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Takeda T (2001)	11359920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247603	2541165	2539666	277680	276221	SPBC776.12c	SPBC16A3.11	hsk1	eso1	cdc7	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Takeda T (2001)	11359920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247605	2539215	2540695	275785	277219	SPCC285.16c	SPBC19G7.01c	msh6	msh2	-	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tornier C (2001)	11333218	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency	-	-	BIOGRID
247606	2539215	2543392	275785	279814	SPCC285.16c	SPAC8F11.03	msh6	msh3	-	swi4	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tornier C (2001)	11333218	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency	-	-	BIOGRID
247607	2540695	2543392	277219	279814	SPBC19G7.01c	SPAC8F11.03	msh2	msh3	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	swi4	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tornier C (2001)	11333218	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency	-	-	BIOGRID
247609	2540620	2540620	277146	277146	SPBC4.04c	SPBC4.04c	mcm2	mcm2	cdc19|nda1	cdc19|nda1	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Pasion SG (1999)	10588642	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247610	2538838	2540620	275419	277146	SPCC1682.02c	SPBC4.04c	mcm3	mcm2	-	cdc19|nda1	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Pasion SG (1999)	10588642	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247611	2539869	2542472	276415	278933	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC9E9.13	cdc2	wos2	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Munoz MJ (1999)	10581266	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|cell size	-	-	BIOGRID
247612	2543666	2539123	280080	275695	SPAC644.06c	SPCC18B5.03	cdr1	wee1	nim1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Hudson JD (1990)	2245912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|viability:undetermined	genetic complex|mutations in wee1 rescue the high temperature lethality of a cdr1/cdc25 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
247613	2542632	2539123	279086	275695	SPAC24H6.05	SPCC18B5.03	cdc25	wee1	sal2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Hudson JD (1990)	2245912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|viability:undetermined	genetic complex|mutations in wee1 rescue the high temperature lethality of a cdr1/cdc25 double mutant|mutations in wee1 rescue the high temperature lethality of a cdr2/cdc25 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
247614	2543666	2539869	280080	276415	SPAC644.06c	SPBC11B10.09	cdr1	cdc2	nim1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Hudson JD (1990)	2245912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|viability:undetermined	genetic complex|mutations in cdc2 rescue the high temperature lethality of a cdr1/cdc25 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
247615	2542632	2539869	279086	276415	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC11B10.09	cdc25	cdc2	sal2	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Hudson JD (1990)	2245912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|viability:undetermined	cut12/cdc2 double mutants have an additive effect on the suppression of cdc25 mutant conditional lethality|genetic complex|mutations in cdc2 rescue the high temperature lethality of a cdr1/cdc25 double mutant|mutations in cdc2 rescue the high temperature lethality of a cdr2/cdc25 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
247616	2541590	2539123	278087	275695	SPAC57A10.02	SPCC18B5.03	cdr2	wee1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Hudson JD (1990)	2245912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|viability:undetermined	genetic complex|mutations in wee1 rescue the high temperature lethality of a cdr2/cdc25 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
247617	2541590	2539869	278087	276415	SPAC57A10.02	SPBC11B10.09	cdr2	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Hudson JD (1990)	2245912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|viability:undetermined	genetic complex|mutations in cdc2 rescue the high temperature lethality of a cdr2/cdc25 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
247622	2541193	2539179	277707	275750	SPBC776.02c	SPCC31H12.05c	dis2	sds21	bws1|sds1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kinoshita N (1990)	2170029	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247624	2542677	2542200	279130	278675	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC19D5.01	pyp1	pyp2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Millar JB (1992)	1464319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247625	2542632	2541443	279086	277948	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC11E3.09	cdc25	pyp3	sal2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Millar JB (1992)	1464318	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247628	2540620	2542266	277146	278735	SPBC4.04c	SPAC17D4.02	mcm2	cdc45	cdc19|nda1	goa1|sna41	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Miyake S (1998)	9619628	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247631	2542029	2541051	278511	277566	SPAC8E11.02c	SPBC3E7.08c	rad24	rad13	anr5|sam4	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Andoh T (1998)	9613582	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	double mutants show increased sensitivity to UV	-	BIOGRID
247632	2541439	2541051	277944	277566	SPAC22F8.11	SPBC3E7.08c	plc1	rad13	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Andoh T (1998)	9613582	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	double mutants show increased sensitivity to UV	-	BIOGRID
247633	2541889	2540051	278379	276589	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC32H8.12c	pom1	act1	-	cps8|pi012	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Baehler J (1998)	9573052	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247634	2541889	2543526	278379	279944	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC4A8.15c	pom1	cdc3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Baehler J (1998)	9573052	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247635	2541889	2541940	278379	278427	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC27F1.02c	pom1	cdc8	-	fus4	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Baehler J (1998)	9573052	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247636	2541889	2540582	278379	277108	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC26H8.07c	pom1	nda3	-	alp12|ben1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Baehler J (1998)	9573052	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247637	2541889	2540936	278379	277452	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC800.05c	pom1	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Baehler J (1998)	9573052	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247638	2541889	2539047	278379	275620	SPAC2F7.03c	SPCC1223.06	pom1	tea1	-	alp8	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Baehler J (1998)	9573052	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247639	2541889	2540624	278379	277150	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC24C6.07	pom1	cdc14	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Baehler J (1998)	9573052	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247641	2542824	2539123	279271	275695	SPAC144.13c	SPCC18B5.03	srw1	wee1	ste9	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kitamura K (1998)	9571240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247642	2542824	2539640	279271	276195	SPAC144.13c	SPBC32F12.09	srw1	rum1	ste9	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kitamura K (1998)	9571240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|viability|viability:partial rescue	genetic complex|overexpression of rum1 partially rescues the lethality of a ste9/wee1 mutant|overexpression of rum1 suppresses the growth defects of an swr1/cdc10 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
247643	2539123	2539640	275695	276195	SPCC18B5.03	SPBC32F12.09	wee1	rum1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kitamura K (1998)	9571240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	genetic complex|overexpression of rum1 partially rescues the lethality of a ste9/wee1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
247644	2541827	2543145	278318	279577	SPAC20G8.03	SPAC4F8.15	itr2	itr1	-	SPAC7D4.01	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Niederberger C (1998)	9560432	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247645	2539781	2541867	276331	278357	SPBC106.10	SPAC22E12.14c	pka1	sck2	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Fujita M (1998)	9560431	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|growth in exponential phase|mating response	overexpression of sck1 or sck2 suppresses the aberrant mating, long doubling time and cell shortening seen in a pka1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
247646	2539781	2542492	276331	278951	SPBC106.10	SPAC1B9.02c	pka1	sck1	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Fujita M (1998)	9560431	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation|growth in exponential phase	genetic complex|pka1/sck1/sck2 triple mutants show an increased doubling time and cellular aggregation	-	BIOGRID
247647	2539781	2541867	276331	278357	SPBC106.10	SPAC22E12.14c	pka1	sck2	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Fujita M (1998)	9560431	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation|growth in exponential phase	genetic complex|pka1/sck1/sck2 triple mutants show an increased doubling time and cellular aggregation	-	BIOGRID
247648	2541746	2542558	278240	279014	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC1952.07	hus1	rad1	-	rad19	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kostrub CF (1998)	9524127	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247653	2540992	2538762	277508	275345	SPBC342.05	SPCC306.04c	crb2	set1	rhp9	kmt2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kanoh J (2003)	12589755	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	deletion of set1 partially rescues the reduced viability of crb2/cdc6 double mutants at 37 degrees|deletion of set1 partially rescues the sensitivity to HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423) seen in a crb2 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
247659	2540633	2539123	277159	275695	SPBC21D10.12	SPCC18B5.03	hob1	wee1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Routhier EL (2003)	12569356	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	deletion of wee1 partially suppresses the sensitivity to phleomycin (CID 72511) of a hob1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
247660	2540633	2540719	277159	277242	SPBC21D10.12	SPBC216.05	hob1	rad3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Routhier EL (2003)	12569356	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	double mutants show increased sensitivity to phleomycin (CID 72511)	-	BIOGRID
247662	3361532	2539847	280608	276395	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC530.14c	lkh1	dsk1	kic1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tang Z (2003)	12565823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247663	2541089	2540025	277604	276569	SPBC646.09c	SPBC16G5.01	int6	rpn12	yin6	SPBC342.07|mts3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247664	2541089	2540939	277604	277455	SPBC646.09c	SPBC4.07c	int6	rpt2	yin6	mts2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247665	2541089	2540939	277604	277455	SPBC646.09c	SPBC4.07c	int6	rpt2	yin6	mts2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247667	2540025	2541089	276569	277604	SPBC16G5.01	SPBC646.09c	rpn12	int6	SPBC342.07|mts3	yin6	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247668	2540939	2541089	277455	277604	SPBC4.07c	SPBC646.09c	rpt2	int6	mts2	yin6	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	double mutants show increased missegregation of chromosomes	-	BIOGRID
247669	2541089	2539641	277604	276196	SPBC646.09c	SPBC14C8.01c	int6	cut2	yin6	SPBC1815.02c	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247670	2541089	2540880	277604	277397	SPBC646.09c	SPBC582.03	int6	cdc13	yin6	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247671	2541089	2542907	277604	279351	SPBC646.09c	SPAC1420.03	int6	rpn501	yin6	rpn5|rpn5-a	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247672	2541089	2542184	277604	278659	SPBC646.09c	SPAC17C9.13c	int6	cut8	yin6	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247673	2542285	2540939	278753	277455	SPAC17H9.09c	SPBC4.07c	ras1	rpt2	ste5	mts2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247674	2539658	2539242	276213	275812	SPBC1105.17	SPCC290.04	cnp1	ams2	sim2	SPCC4F11.01	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Chen ES (2003)	12535531	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	overexpression rescues growth at 33 degrees	-	BIOGRID
247675	2539242	2539658	275812	276213	SPCC290.04	SPBC1105.17	ams2	cnp1	SPCC4F11.01	sim2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Chen ES (2003)	12535531	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247676	2539242	2542463	275812	278924	SPCC290.04	SPAC1834.03c	ams2	hhf1	SPCC4F11.01	h4.1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Chen ES (2003)	12535531	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247677	2539242	2539991	275812	276535	SPCC290.04	SPBC1105.12	ams2	hhf3	SPCC4F11.01	h4.3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Chen ES (2003)	12535531	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247678	2539242	2542304	275812	278771	SPCC290.04	SPAC1687.20c	ams2	mis6	SPCC4F11.01	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Chen ES (2003)	12535531	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	at 30 degrees	-	BIOGRID
247679	2540494	2539242	277022	275812	SPBC409.04c	SPCC290.04	mis12	ams2	-	SPCC4F11.01	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Chen ES (2003)	12535531	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247680	2540345	2542967	276874	279407	SPBC19C7.09c	SPAC12B10.12c	uve1	rhp41	uvde	rhp4a	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Fukumoto Y (2002)	12531030	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|chromosome/plasmid maintenance|viability	double mutants show increased sensitivity to UV and decreased NER	-	BIOGRID
247681	2541153	2541871	277668	278361	SPBC725.16	SPAC22F3.09c	res1	res2	sct1	mcs1|pct1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Miyamoto M (1994)	8168485	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:wild type|heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247683	2540580	2541153	277106	277668	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC725.16	ran1	res1	pat1	sct1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Obara-Ishihara T (1994)	7909513	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating response:wild type	overexpression inhibits the conjugation phenotype of a pat1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
247684	2540580	2541871	277106	278361	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC22F3.09c	ran1	res2	pat1	mcs1|pct1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Obara-Ishihara T (1994)	7909513	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating response:wild type	genetic complex|overexpression inhibits the conjugation phenotype of a pat1 mutant|overexpression of res2 and cdc10 inhibits the conjugation phenotype of a pat1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
247685	2540032	2540541	276575	277068	SPBC1703.14c	SPBC1A4.03c	top1	top2	-	ptr11	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Brill SJ (1987)	2436053	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247686	2539123	2542298	275695	278765	SPCC18B5.03	SPAC29A4.02c	wee1	SPAC29A4.02c	-	tef3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sakai T (2004)	14985109	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|mitotic cell cycle:partial rescue	a partially deleted EF-3 gene can suppress the temperature sensitive rad1/wee1 mitotic catastrophe mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
247687	2542558	2542298	279014	278765	SPAC1952.07	SPAC29A4.02c	rad1	SPAC29A4.02c	rad19	tef3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sakai T (2004)	14985109	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|mitotic cell cycle:partial rescue	a partially deleted EF-3 gene can suppress the temperature sensitive rad1/wee1 mitotic catastrophe mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
247688	2540885	2542298	277402	278765	SPBC660.14	SPAC29A4.02c	mik1	SPAC29A4.02c	-	tef3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sakai T (2004)	14985109	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|mitotic cell cycle:partial rescue	a partially deleted EF-3 gene can suppress the temperature sensitive mik1/wee1 mitotic catastrophe mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
247689	2539869	2542298	276415	278765	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC29A4.02c	cdc2	SPAC29A4.02c	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	tef3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sakai T (2004)	14985109	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|mitotic cell cycle:partial rescue	a partially deleted EF-3 gene can suppress the temperature sensitive cdc2/wee1 mitotic catastrophe mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
247690	2542824	2539869	279271	276415	SPAC144.13c	SPBC11B10.09	srw1	cdc2	ste9	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sakai T (2004)	14985109	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	deletion of cdc13 or cdc2 inhibits the suppression of cyclohexamide sensitivity seen in an srw1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
247691	2542824	2540880	279271	277397	SPAC144.13c	SPBC582.03	srw1	cdc13	ste9	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sakai T (2004)	14985109	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	deletion of cdc13 or cdc2 inhibits the suppression of cyclohexamide sensitivity seen in an srw1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
247694	2541465	2540936	277967	277452	SPAC30C2.02	SPBC800.05c	mmd1	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Weir BA (2004)	14767070	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247695	2540255	2539087	276786	275659	SPBC336.04	SPCC1259.13	cdc6	chk1	mis10|pol3|pold	rad27	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mochida S (2004)	14739927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:wild type	deletion of chk1 abolishes the checkpoint arrest caused by deletion of cdc6	-	BIOGRID
247696	2543576	2539149	279991	275721	SPAC4A8.05c	SPCC1739.11c	myp2	cdc11	myo3	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bezanilla M (1997)	9398685	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247697	2543576	2540624	279991	277150	SPAC4A8.05c	SPBC24C6.07	myp2	cdc14	myo3	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bezanilla M (1997)	9398685	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247698	2543576	2542162	279991	278638	SPAC4A8.05c	SPAC6F6.08c	myp2	cdc16	myo3	bub2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bezanilla M (1997)	9398685	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247699	2542558	2542824	279014	279271	SPAC1952.07	SPAC144.13c	rad1	srw1	rad19	ste9	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yamaguchi S (1997)	9398669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	genetic complex|overexpression of srw1 rescues the lethality of a rad1/wee1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
247700	2539123	2542824	275695	279271	SPCC18B5.03	SPAC144.13c	wee1	srw1	-	ste9	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yamaguchi S (1997)	9398669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	genetic complex|overexpression of srw1 rescues the lethality of a rad3/wee1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
247701	2540719	2542824	277242	279271	SPBC216.05	SPAC144.13c	rad3	srw1	-	ste9	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yamaguchi S (1997)	9398669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	genetic complex|overexpression of srw1 rescues the lethality of a rad3/wee1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
247702	2539087	2542824	275659	279271	SPCC1259.13	SPAC144.13c	chk1	srw1	rad27	ste9	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yamaguchi S (1997)	9398669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	genetic complex|overexpression of srw1 rescues the lethality of a chk1/wee1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
247703	2540885	2542824	277402	279271	SPBC660.14	SPAC144.13c	mik1	srw1	-	ste9	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yamaguchi S (1997)	9398669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	genetic complex|overexpression of srw1 rescues the lethality of a mik1/wee1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
247706	2542824	2539123	279271	275695	SPAC144.13c	SPCC18B5.03	srw1	wee1	ste9	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yamaguchi S (1997)	9398669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247707	2542824	2539869	279271	276415	SPAC144.13c	SPBC11B10.09	srw1	cdc2	ste9	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Yamaguchi S (1997)	9398669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	overexpression of constitutively active Cdc2F15 is extremely toxic to swr1 mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
247709	2542824	2540880	279271	277397	SPAC144.13c	SPBC582.03	srw1	cdc13	ste9	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Yamaguchi S (1997)	9398669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	genetic complex|overexpression of cdc13 is toxic in an srw1/wee1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
247711	2540013	2543481	276557	279901	SPBC14C8.07c	SPAPB2B4.03	cdc18	cig2	-	cyc17	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jallepalli PV (1997)	9353247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type|heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	deletion of the cig2 cyclin reversed the lethal cell cycle defect caused by the cdc18 mutation	-	BIOGRID
247712	2541268	2540939	277782	277455	SPBP19A11.03c	SPBC4.07c	mts4	rpt2	rpn1	mts2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wilkinson CR (1997)	9325304	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247715	2541720	2538770	278214	275353	SPAC23H3.13c	SPCC1753.02c	gpa2	git3	git8	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nocero M (1994)	8001792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	double mutants show an increase in the expression of target genes as measured but a beta-galactosidase reporter	-	BIOGRID
247716	2541720	2539974	278214	276518	SPAC23H3.13c	SPBC32H8.07	gpa2	git5	git8	gpb1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nocero M (1994)	8001792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	double mutants show an increase in the expression of target genes as measured but a beta-galactosidase reporter	-	BIOGRID
247717	2540234	2541153	276766	277668	SPBC336.12c	SPBC725.16	cdc10	res1	-	sct1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Marks J (1992)	1522142	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	an sct1-1 mutant rescues the lethality of a cdc10 null mutant	-	BIOGRID
247718	2540880	2543481	277397	279901	SPBC582.03	SPAPB2B4.03	cdc13	cig2	-	cyc17	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Fisher DL (1996)	8631306	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression	-	-	BIOGRID
247720	2542634	2543607	279088	280022	SPAC24H6.04	SPAC4F8.07c	hxk1	hxk2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Petit T (1996)	8549830	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247722	2538736	2541633	275320	278129	SPCC1322.12c	SPAC664.01c	bub1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kitajima TS (2004)	14730319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247723	2538736	2542788	275320	279237	SPCC1322.12c	SPAC15A10.15	bub1	sgo2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kitajima TS (2004)	14730319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show slightly increased sensitivity to TBZ	-	BIOGRID
247727	2542207	2542696	278682	279149	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC29B12.03	ddb1	spd1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bondar T (2004)	14701809	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein activity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247728	2538930	2539403	275506	275968	SPCC188.13c	SPCC736.11	dcr1	ago1	SPCC584.10c	csp9	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Carmichael JB (2004)	14699070	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type|cytokinesis:wild type|resistance to chemicals:wild type|septum formation:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	high level expression of Ago1 restores the septation index of dcr1 mutant cells to normal levels and restores growth in the presence of HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423)	-	BIOGRID
247729	2543580	2542106	279995	278582	SPAC644.14c	SPAC8E11.03c	rad51	dmc1	rhp51	dmp1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Grishchuk AL (2003)	14668362	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation	double mutants show reduced spore viability	-	BIOGRID
247730	2542106	2543685	278582	280099	SPAC8E11.03c	SPAC3C7.03c	dmc1	rad55	dmp1	rhp55	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Grishchuk AL (2003)	14668362	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation	dmc1/rhp55/rhp57 triple mutants show a loss of spore viability|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
247731	2542106	2542007	278582	278490	SPAC8E11.03c	SPAC20H4.07	dmc1	rad57	dmp1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Grishchuk AL (2003)	14668362	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation	dmc1/rhp55/rhp57 triple mutants show a loss of spore viability|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
247738	2541185	2539312	277699	275879	SPBC6B1.07	SPCC777.14	prp1	prp4	zer1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Urushiyama S (1997)	9286671	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247739	2539149	2540528	275721	277056	SPCC1739.11c	SPBC18H10.04c	cdc11	sce3	-	tif48	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Schmidt S (1997)	9254700	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247740	2540624	2540528	277150	277056	SPBC24C6.07	SPBC18H10.04c	cdc14	sce3	-	tif48	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Schmidt S (1997)	9254700	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247741	2539869	2539123	276415	275695	SPBC11B10.09	SPCC18B5.03	cdc2	wee1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tournier S (2000)	11029045	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247742	2539869	2541871	276415	278361	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC22F3.09c	cdc2	res2	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	mcs1|pct1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tournier S (2000)	11029045	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	MCS1 deletion rescues temperature sensitive growth in CDC2/WEE1 background	-	BIOGRID
247743	2539123	2541871	275695	278361	SPCC18B5.03	SPAC22F3.09c	wee1	res2	-	mcs1|pct1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tournier S (2000)	11029045	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	MCS1 deletion rescues temperature sensitive growth in CDC2/WEE1 background	-	BIOGRID
247744	2540885	2541871	277402	278361	SPBC660.14	SPAC22F3.09c	mik1	res2	-	mcs1|pct1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tournier S (2000)	11029045	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	MCS1 deletion rescues temperature sensitive growth in MIK1/WEE1 background	-	BIOGRID
247746	2542632	2541871	279086	278361	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC22F3.09c	cdc25	res2	sal2	mcs1|pct1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tournier S (2000)	11029045	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in G2 phase	-	-	BIOGRID
247747	2542632	2541153	279086	277668	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC725.16	cdc25	res1	sal2	sct1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tournier S (2000)	11029045	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in G2 phase	-	-	BIOGRID
247748	2542632	2540234	279086	276766	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC336.12c	cdc25	cdc10	sal2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tournier S (2000)	11029045	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in G2 phase	-	-	BIOGRID
247749	2542632	2540341	279086	276870	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC2F12.11c	cdc25	rep2	sal2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tournier S (2000)	11029045	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in G2 phase	-	-	BIOGRID
247752	2541165	2540470	277680	276998	SPBC776.12c	SPBC29A10.15	hsk1	orc1	cdc7	cdc30|orp1|rid1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Snaith HA (2000)	11027263	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247753	2541165	2543281	277680	279708	SPBC776.12c	SPAC23C4.18c	hsk1	rad4	cdc7	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Snaith HA (2000)	11027263	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
247754	2541165	2540620	277680	277146	SPBC776.12c	SPBC4.04c	hsk1	mcm2	cdc7	cdc19|nda1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Snaith HA (2000)	11027263	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247755	2541165	2540784	277680	277303	SPBC776.12c	SPBC211.04c	hsk1	mcm6	cdc7	mis5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Snaith HA (2000)	11027263	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247756	2541165	2539838	277680	276387	SPBC776.12c	SPBC1347.10	hsk1	cdc23	cdc7	mcm10	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Snaith HA (2000)	11027263	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247757	2541165	2543407	277680	279829	SPBC776.12c	SPAC8F11.07c	hsk1	cdc24	cdc7	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Snaith HA (2000)	11027263	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247758	2541165	2542632	277680	279086	SPBC776.12c	SPAC24H6.05	hsk1	cdc25	cdc7	sal2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Snaith HA (2000)	11027263	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247759	2541165	2541620	277680	278117	SPBC776.12c	SPAC2G11.12	hsk1	rqh1	cdc7	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Snaith HA (2000)	11027263	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247760	2541165	2539447	277680	276010	SPBC776.12c	SPCC338.17c	hsk1	rad21	cdc7	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Snaith HA (2000)	11027263	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247761	2541165	2540719	277680	277242	SPBC776.12c	SPBC216.05	hsk1	rad3	cdc7	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Snaith HA (2000)	11027263	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247762	2541165	2539087	277680	275659	SPBC776.12c	SPCC1259.13	hsk1	chk1	cdc7	rad27	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Snaith HA (2000)	11027263	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247763	2539933	2540719	276477	277242	SPBC17D11.06	SPBC216.05	spp2	rad3	pri2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tan S (2000)	11027257	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247764	2539933	2543289	276477	279714	SPBC17D11.06	SPAC9E9.08	spp2	rad26	pri2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tan S (2000)	11027257	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247765	2539933	2541746	276477	278240	SPBC17D11.06	SPAC20G4.04c	spp2	hus1	pri2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tan S (2000)	11027257	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247766	2539933	2542558	276477	279014	SPBC17D11.06	SPAC1952.07	spp2	rad1	pri2	rad19	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tan S (2000)	11027257	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247767	2539933	2543544	276477	279961	SPBC17D11.06	SPAC664.07c	spp2	rad9	pri2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tan S (2000)	11027257	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247768	2539933	2541643	276477	278139	SPBC17D11.06	SPAC14C4.13	spp2	rad17	pri2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tan S (2000)	11027257	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247769	2539933	2538959	276477	275533	SPBC17D11.06	SPCC18B5.11c	spp2	cds1	pri2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tan S (2000)	11027257	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247770	2539087	2539933	275659	276477	SPCC1259.13	SPBC17D11.06	chk1	spp2	rad27	pri2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tan S (2000)	11027257	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247771	2541627	2539649	278123	276204	SPAC1F5.08c	SPBC12D12.04c	yam8	pck2	ehs1	pkc1|sts6	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Carnero E (2000)	11016847	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:wild type|heat sensitivity:wild type|mating efficiency:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247785	2543341	2541847	279764	278338	SPAC8E11.07c	SPAC22H10.10	alp31	alp21	-	sto1	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Radcliffe PA (2000)	10978278	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247786	2543341	2540582	279764	277108	SPAC8E11.07c	SPBC26H8.07c	alp31	nda3	-	alp12|ben1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Radcliffe PA (2000)	10978278	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247787	2540020	2542558	276564	279014	SPBC16D10.09	SPAC1952.07	pcn1	rad1	pcn	rad19	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Arroyo MP (1998)	9563836	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247788	2540020	2543164	276564	279595	SPBC16D10.09	SPAC3G6.06c	pcn1	rad2	pcn	fen1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Arroyo MP (1998)	9563836	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247789	2540020	2540719	276564	277242	SPBC16D10.09	SPBC216.05	pcn1	rad3	pcn	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Arroyo MP (1998)	9563836	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247790	2540020	2543544	276564	279961	SPBC16D10.09	SPAC664.07c	pcn1	rad9	pcn	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Arroyo MP (1998)	9563836	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247791	2540020	2541051	276564	277566	SPBC16D10.09	SPBC3E7.08c	pcn1	rad13	pcn	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Arroyo MP (1998)	9563836	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247792	2540020	2541643	276564	278139	SPBC16D10.09	SPAC14C4.13	pcn1	rad17	pcn	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Arroyo MP (1998)	9563836	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247793	2540020	2543289	276564	279714	SPBC16D10.09	SPAC9E9.08	pcn1	rad26	pcn	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Arroyo MP (1998)	9563836	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247794	2540020	2539087	276564	275659	SPBC16D10.09	SPCC1259.13	pcn1	chk1	pcn	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Arroyo MP (1998)	9563836	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247795	2541059	2540149	277574	276686	SPBC557.03c	SPBC1289.03c	pim1	spi1	dcd1|ptr2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Matynia A (1998)	9560394	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247796	2539869	2543537	276415	279954	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC4D7.05	cdc2	sum1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	tif34	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Humphrey T (1998)	9560390	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	overexpression of sum1 rescues sensitivity to HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423)	-	BIOGRID
247797	2539869	2542677	276415	279130	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC26F1.10c	cdc2	pyp1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Humphrey T (1998)	9560390	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	overexpression of pyp1 rescues sensitivity to HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423)	-	BIOGRID
247798	2539869	2541652	276415	278148	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC24B11.06c	cdc2	sty1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	phh1|spc1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Humphrey T (1998)	9560390	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of sty1 rescues sensitivity to HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423)	-	BIOGRID
247799	2543040	2542140	279475	278616	SPAC31G5.13	SPAC1783.07c	rpn11	pap1	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	caf3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Arioka M (1998)	9532803	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	deletion of pap1 abolishes the multi-drug resistance conferred by overexpression of rpn11	-	BIOGRID
247801	2541141	2542632	277656	279086	SPBC649.05	SPAC24H6.05	cut12	cdc25	stf1	sal2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bridge AJ (1998)	9531532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247802	2540234	2539640	276766	276195	SPBC336.12c	SPBC32F12.09	cdc10	rum1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez-Diaz A (1998)	9472012	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247803	2539627	2542083	276184	278560	SPBC1734.02c	SPAC27E2.05	cdc27	cdc1	SPBC337.18c	mis1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	MacNeill SA (1996)	8887553	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247804	2541514	2541612	278015	278109	SPAC2E1P5.04c	SPAC1F7.04	cwg2	rho1	orb7	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Arellano M (1996)	8887550	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chemical compound accumulation:partial rescue	Rho1 is able to partly complement the defect in glucan synthase associated with the cwg2-1 mutation	-	BIOGRID
247805	2539180	2542632	275751	279086	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC24H6.05	sts5	cdc25	orb4	sal2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Toda T (1996)	8886983	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	double mutants show increased abnormalities in cell shape	-	BIOGRID
247806	2539180	2540660	275751	277185	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC21.06c	sts5	cdc7	orb4	its10|pld1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Toda T (1996)	8886983	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	double mutants show increased abnormalities in cell shape	-	BIOGRID
247807	2539180	2540234	275751	276766	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC336.12c	sts5	cdc10	orb4	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Toda T (1996)	8886983	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	double mutants show increased abnormalities in cell shape	-	BIOGRID
247808	2539180	2542677	275751	279130	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC26F1.10c	sts5	pyp1	orb4	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Toda T (1996)	8886983	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:wild type|resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	overexpression reverses the cell shape abnormalities and sensitivity to staurosporine seen in an sts5 mutant	-	BIOGRID
247810	2539180	2541055	275751	277570	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC409.07c	sts5	wis1	orb4	smf2|spc2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Toda T (1996)	8886983	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:wild type|resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	deletion of wis1 rescues the sensitivity to staurosporine of an sts5 mutant and partially relieves cell shape phenotypes	-	BIOGRID
247811	2539180	2542293	275751	278761	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC17G8.14c	sts5	pck1	orb4	SPAC22H10.01c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Toda T (1996)	8886983	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:wild type|resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	overexpression reverses the cell shape abnormalities and sensitivity to staurosporine seen in an sts5 mutant	-	BIOGRID
247812	2539180	2538951	275751	275525	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC297.03	sts5	ssp1	orb4	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Toda T (1996)	8886983	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:undetermined|resistance to chemicals:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247813	2539180	2539109	275751	275681	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC74.03c	sts5	ssp2	orb4	ucp9	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Toda T (1996)	8886983	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:undetermined|resistance to chemicals:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247814	2539180	2538758	275751	275341	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC1739.12	sts5	ppe1	orb4	esp1|ppx1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Toda T (1996)	8886983	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247815	2539180	2540024	275751	276568	SPCC16C4.09	SPBP4H10.04	sts5	ppb1	orb4	SPBC1346.01c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Toda T (1996)	8886983	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247816	2541652	2540329	278148	276859	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC29B5.01	sty1	atf1	phh1|spc1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Shiozaki K (1996)	8824587	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247817	2541652	2540363	278148	276892	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC2F12.09c	sty1	atf21	phh1|spc1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Shiozaki K (1996)	8824587	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247820	2542804	2541652	279252	278148	SPAC29A4.16	SPAC24B11.06c	hal4	sty1	ppk10|sat4	phh1|spc1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Wang LY (2005)	15870269	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|resistance to chemicals	double mutants show increased sensitivity to cations	-	BIOGRID
247822	2542358	2541957	278823	278444	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC23C11.16	clp1	plo1	flp1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bimbo A (2005)	15857958	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247823	2542358	2541599	278823	278096	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC24B11.11c	clp1	sid2	flp1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bimbo A (2005)	15857958	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247824	2542358	2542761	278823	279211	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC1565.06c	clp1	spg1	flp1	sid3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bimbo A (2005)	15857958	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247825	2542358	2540650	278823	277175	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC244.01c	clp1	sid4	flp1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bimbo A (2005)	15857958	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247826	2539504	2540684	276067	277209	SPCP31B10.03c	SPBC776.18c	med31	pmh1	sep10|soh1	mcr1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Lee KM (2005)	15829570	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	colony shape|colony size|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247827	2540471	2540866	276999	277383	SPBC19F8.07	SPBC4C3.12	mcs6	sep1	cdk7|crk1|mop1	SPBC4C3.05	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Lee KM (2005)	15829570	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247829	2542207	2542696	278682	279149	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC29B12.03	ddb1	spd1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Holmberg C (2005)	15805471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue|meiosis:wild type|resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247831	2542207	2540695	278682	277219	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC19G7.01c	ddb1	msh2	-	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Holmberg C (2005)	15805471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency	-	-	BIOGRID
247832	2543629	2539004	280043	275578	SPAC3H5.06c	SPCC4G3.05c	pol1	mus81	polA|swi7	slx3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kai M (2005)	15805465	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247833	2543629	2543670	280043	280084	SPAC3H5.06c	SPAPB1E7.06c	pol1	eme1	polA|swi7	mms4|slx2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kai M (2005)	15805465	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247834	2543629	2543580	280043	279995	SPAC3H5.06c	SPAC644.14c	pol1	rad51	polA|swi7	rhp51	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kai M (2005)	15805465	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247835	2541620	2539881	278117	276427	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC16G5.12c	rqh1	top3	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ahmad F (2005)	15702347	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247836	2543379	3361560	279801	280636	SPAC821.09	SPAC14C4.09	eng1	agn1	-	SPAC14C4.09	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Alonso-Nunez ML (2005)	15689498	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247837	2543240	2539545	279668	276106	SPAC694.06c	SPCC4B3.12	mrc1	set9	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanders SL (2004)	15550243	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247838	2538959	2539545	275533	276106	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC4B3.12	cds1	set9	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanders SL (2004)	15550243	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247839	2540992	2539545	277508	276106	SPBC342.05	SPCC4B3.12	crb2	set9	rhp9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanders SL (2004)	15550243	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247840	2539437	2541612	276000	278109	SPCC645.06c	SPAC1F7.04	rgf3	rho1	lad1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Tajadura V (2004)	15546915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
247841	2541455	2539352	277958	275918	SPAC6G9.06c	SPCC188.07	pcp1	ccq1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Flory MR (2004)	15546621	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|protein/peptide distribution	-	-	BIOGRID
247843	2541672	2542358	278168	278823	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC1782.09c	lsk1	clp1	-	flp1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Karagiannis J (2005)	15537703	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	Mutation of CLP1 alleviates sensitivity to DMSO in an LSK1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
247844	2540624	2541672	277150	278168	SPBC24C6.07	SPAC2F3.15	cdc14	lsk1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Karagiannis J (2005)	15537703	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247845	2542746	2541672	279196	278168	SPAC9G1.09	SPAC2F3.15	sid1	lsk1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Karagiannis J (2005)	15537703	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247846	2541672	2541957	278168	278444	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC23C11.16	lsk1	plo1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Karagiannis J (2005)	15537703	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247847	2542162	2541672	278638	278168	SPAC6F6.08c	SPAC2F3.15	cdc16	lsk1	bub2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Karagiannis J (2005)	15537703	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247848	2540956	2540329	277472	276859	SPBC409.06	SPBC29B5.01	uch2	atf1	-	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Stone M (2004)	15533439	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247849	2540956	2540025	277472	276569	SPBC409.06	SPBC16G5.01	uch2	rpn12	-	SPBC342.07|mts3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Stone M (2004)	15533439	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247850	2540956	2541268	277472	277782	SPBC409.06	SPBP19A11.03c	uch2	mts4	-	rpn1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Stone M (2004)	15533439	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247851	2540956	2543040	277472	279475	SPBC409.06	SPAC31G5.13	uch2	rpn11	-	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Stone M (2004)	15533439	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247852	2540956	2540939	277472	277455	SPBC409.06	SPBC4.07c	uch2	rpt2	-	mts2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Stone M (2004)	15533439	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247853	2541819	2540329	278310	276859	SPAC6G9.08	SPBC29B5.01	ubp6	atf1	-	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Stone M (2004)	15533439	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247854	2541819	2540025	278310	276569	SPAC6G9.08	SPBC16G5.01	ubp6	rpn12	-	SPBC342.07|mts3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Stone M (2004)	15533439	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247855	2541819	2540939	278310	277455	SPAC6G9.08	SPBC4.07c	ubp6	rpt2	-	mts2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Stone M (2004)	15533439	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247856	2541819	2541268	278310	277782	SPAC6G9.08	SPBP19A11.03c	ubp6	mts4	-	rpn1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Stone M (2004)	15533439	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247857	2541819	2543040	278310	279475	SPAC6G9.08	SPAC31G5.13	ubp6	rpn11	-	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Stone M (2004)	15533439	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247858	2542150	2538959	278626	275533	SPAC17A5.11	SPCC18B5.11c	rec12	cds1	spo11	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Pankratz DG (2005)	15689488	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247859	2542150	2539087	278626	275659	SPAC17A5.11	SPCC1259.13	rec12	chk1	spo11	rad27	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Pankratz DG (2005)	15689488	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247860	2542150	2540719	278626	277242	SPAC17A5.11	SPBC216.05	rec12	rad3	spo11	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Pankratz DG (2005)	15689488	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247861	2542358	2539447	278823	276010	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC338.17c	clp1	rad21	flp1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Trautmann S (2004)	15525536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247862	2539505	2542358	276068	278823	SPCC736.14	SPAC1782.09c	dis1	clp1	-	flp1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Trautmann S (2004)	15525536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation|cold sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show reduced viability and increased aneuploidy due to chromosome segregation defects	-	BIOGRID
247864	2540643	2540866	277168	277383	SPBC19G7.06	SPBC4C3.12	mbx1	sep1	-	SPBC4C3.05	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Buck V (2004)	15509866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis	double mutants show an increased defect in cytokinesis	-	BIOGRID
247865	2540643	2539703	277168	276256	SPBC19G7.06	SPBC16G5.15c	mbx1	fkh2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Buck V (2004)	15509866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis	double mutants show an increased defect in cytokinesis	-	BIOGRID
247866	2539703	2540643	276256	277168	SPBC16G5.15c	SPBC19G7.06	fkh2	mbx1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Buck V (2004)	15509866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	the slow growth phenotype of fkh2 null cells is not observed in mbx1/fkh2 double mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
247867	2542069	2543044	278546	279479	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC3C7.12	ssm4	tip1	SPAC637.01c	noc1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Niccoli T (2004)	15509865	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytoskeleton morphology|shmoo formation	-	-	BIOGRID
247868	2541620	2543580	278117	279995	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC644.14c	rqh1	rad51	hus2|rad12|rec9	rhp51	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hope JC (2005)	15802523	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247869	2541620	2542749	278117	279199	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC15A10.03c	rqh1	rad54	hus2|rad12|rec9	rhp54	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hope JC (2005)	15802523	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247870	2541620	2543685	278117	280099	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC3C7.03c	rqh1	rad55	hus2|rad12|rec9	rhp55	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Hope JC (2005)	15802523	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247871	2542150	3361400	278626	280476	SPAC17A5.11	SPAC1093.06c	rec12	dhc1	spo11	SPAC30C2.01c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Davis L (2005)	15802518	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation	double mutants show increased incidence of aberrant chromosome segregation	-	BIOGRID
247872	2542150	3361491	278626	280567	SPAC17A5.11	SPAC1805.08	rec12	dlc1	spo11	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Davis L (2005)	15802518	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation	double mutants show increased incidence of aberrant chromosome segregation	-	BIOGRID
247873	2540368	2540821	276897	277339	SPBC36.05c	SPBC800.03	clr6	clr3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hansen KR (2005)	15632061	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
247874	2542744	2539442	279194	276005	SPAC1565.08	SPCC5E4.04	cdc48	cut1	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	ptr4	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247875	2540013	2539442	276557	276005	SPBC14C8.07c	SPCC5E4.04	cdc18	cut1	-	ptr4	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247876	2541107	2539442	277622	276005	SPBC646.14c	SPCC5E4.04	orc5	cut1	-	ptr4	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247877	2539881	2539442	276427	276005	SPBC16G5.12c	SPCC5E4.04	top3	cut1	-	ptr4	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247878	2540784	2539442	277303	276005	SPBC211.04c	SPCC5E4.04	mcm6	cut1	mis5	ptr4	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247879	2539442	2539641	276005	276196	SPCC5E4.04	SPBC14C8.01c	cut1	cut2	ptr4	SPBC1815.02c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247880	2540917	2541529	277433	278029	SPBC409.05	SPAC1687.13c	skp1	csn5	psh1|sph1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Wee S (2005)	15793566	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247881	2540917	2538990	277433	275564	SPBC409.05	SPCC1494.05c	skp1	ubp12	psh1|sph1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Wee S (2005)	15793566	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247882	2540917	2541517	277433	278018	SPBC409.05	SPAC22A12.03c	skp1	csn4	psh1|sph1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Wee S (2005)	15793566	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247883	2542744	2539641	279194	276196	SPAC1565.08	SPBC14C8.01c	cdc48	cut2	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	SPBC1815.02c	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247884	2541592	2539442	278089	276005	SPAC6F12.15c	SPCC5E4.04	cut9	cut1	dre1	ptr4	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247885	2542615	2539442	279069	276005	SPAC19G12.01c	SPCC5E4.04	cut20	cut1	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	ptr4	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247886	2540307	2539442	276837	276005	SPBC1A4.01	SPCC5E4.04	apc10	cut1	SPBC1E8.06	ptr4	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247887	2542880	2539442	279325	276005	SPAC6F12.14	SPCC5E4.04	cut23	cut1	apc8	ptr4	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247888	2541592	2539641	278089	276196	SPAC6F12.15c	SPBC14C8.01c	cut9	cut2	dre1	SPBC1815.02c	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247889	2540307	2539641	276837	276196	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC14C8.01c	apc10	cut2	SPBC1E8.06	SPBC1815.02c	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247890	2542880	2539641	279325	276196	SPAC6F12.14	SPBC14C8.01c	cut23	cut2	apc8	SPBC1815.02c	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247891	2542615	2539641	279069	276196	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBC14C8.01c	cut20	cut2	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	SPBC1815.02c	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247892	2542184	2539641	278659	276196	SPAC17C9.13c	SPBC14C8.01c	cut8	cut2	-	SPBC1815.02c	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247893	2543421	2539442	279843	276005	SPAC3G9.14	SPCC5E4.04	sak1	cut1	-	ptr4	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247894	2543421	2539641	279843	276196	SPAC3G9.14	SPBC14C8.01c	sak1	cut2	-	SPBC1815.02c	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247896	2541605	2539442	278102	276005	SPAC1F7.01c	SPCC5E4.04	spt6	cut1	SPAC694.07c	ptr4	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247897	2540721	2539641	277244	276196	SPBC19G7.16	SPBC14C8.01c	iws1	cut2	-	SPBC1815.02c	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247898	2540721	2539442	277244	276005	SPBC19G7.16	SPCC5E4.04	iws1	cut1	-	ptr4	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247901	2541319	2539817	277831	276367	SPBP4H10.06c	SPBC146.03c	cut14	cut3	smc2	smc4	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247902	2540013	2541319	276557	277831	SPBC14C8.07c	SPBP4H10.06c	cdc18	cut14	-	smc2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247904	2541107	2541319	277622	277831	SPBC646.14c	SPBP4H10.06c	orc5	cut14	-	smc2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247905	2539881	2541319	276427	277831	SPBC16G5.12c	SPBP4H10.06c	top3	cut14	-	smc2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247906	2543629	2541319	280043	277831	SPAC3H5.06c	SPBP4H10.06c	pol1	cut14	polA|swi7	smc2	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247907	2540013	2539817	276557	276367	SPBC14C8.07c	SPBC146.03c	cdc18	cut3	-	smc4	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247908	2541107	2539817	277622	276367	SPBC646.14c	SPBC146.03c	orc5	cut3	-	smc4	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247909	2542387	2539442	278851	276005	SPAC17H9.20	SPCC5E4.04	psc3	cut1	SPAC607.01	ptr4	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247910	2540557	2539442	277084	276005	SPBC29A10.04	SPCC5E4.04	psm1	cut1	smc1	ptr4	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247911	2540737	2539442	277260	276005	SPBC19G7.05c	SPCC5E4.04	bgs1	cut1	cps1|drc1	ptr4	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247912	2540645	2539442	277170	276005	SPBC21B10.05c	SPCC5E4.04	pop3	cut1	wat1	ptr4	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247913	2539845	2539442	276393	276005	SPBC12C2.02c	SPCC5E4.04	ste20	cut1	ste16	ptr4	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247914	2541319	2539505	277831	276068	SPBP4H10.06c	SPCC736.14	cut14	dis1	smc2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247915	2540784	2539505	277303	276068	SPBC211.04c	SPCC736.14	mcm6	dis1	mis5	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247916	2541319	2539497	277831	276060	SPBP4H10.06c	SPCC895.07	cut14	alp14	smc2	mtc1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247917	2541847	2539497	278338	276060	SPAC22H10.10	SPCC895.07	alp21	alp14	sto1	mtc1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247918	2543252	2539497	279680	276060	SPAC4F10.10c	SPCC895.07	mnn9	alp14	-	mtc1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247919	2543280	2539497	279707	276060	SPAC9E9.07c	SPCC895.07	ypt2	alp14	-	mtc1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247920	2542099	2539497	278575	276060	SPAC24H6.12c	SPCC895.07	uba3	alp14	-	mtc1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247921	2540395	2539497	276923	276060	SPBC31E1.05	SPCC895.07	gle1	alp14	-	mtc1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247922	2543323	2539497	279746	276060	SPAC6B12.10c	SPCC895.07	spp1	alp14	pri1	mtc1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247923	2540784	2539497	277303	276060	SPBC211.04c	SPCC895.07	mcm6	alp14	mis5	mtc1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247924	2539442	2539497	276005	276060	SPCC5E4.04	SPCC895.07	cut1	alp14	ptr4	mtc1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247925	2540557	2539497	277084	276060	SPBC29A10.04	SPCC895.07	psm1	alp14	smc1	mtc1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247926	2540307	2539497	276837	276060	SPBC1A4.01	SPCC895.07	apc10	alp14	SPBC1E8.06	mtc1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247927	2542615	2539497	279069	276060	SPAC19G12.01c	SPCC895.07	cut20	alp14	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	mtc1	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247928	2541319	2542657	277831	279111	SPBP4H10.06c	SPAC31A2.05c	cut14	mis4	smc2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247929	2539442	2542657	276005	279111	SPCC5E4.04	SPAC31A2.05c	cut1	mis4	ptr4	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
247930	2540024	2540019	276568	276563	SPBP4H10.04	SPBC1685.01	ppb1	pmp1	SPBC1346.01c	dsp1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Sio SO (2005)	15657058	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	overexpression of pmp1 rescues the MgCl2 hypersensitivity of a ppb1 or cnb1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
247931	2538786	2540019	275367	276563	SPCC830.06	SPBC1685.01	cnb1	pmp1	SPCC830.06	dsp1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Sio SO (2005)	15657058	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	overexpression of pmp1 rescues the MgCl2 hypersensitivity of a ppb1 or cnb1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
247932	2538786	2540024	275367	276568	SPCC830.06	SPBP4H10.04	cnb1	ppb1	SPCC830.06	SPBC1346.01c	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Sio SO (2005)	15657058	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	co-overexpression of cnb1 and ppb1-deltaC (but not wild-type ppb1) causes a growth defect	-	BIOGRID
247933	2540494	2539155	277022	275727	SPBC409.04c	SPCC1020.02	mis12	spc7	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Obuse C (2004)	15502821	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247934	2540494	2541047	277022	277562	SPBC409.04c	SPBC409.09c	mis12	mis13	-	cnl1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Obuse C (2004)	15502821	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247935	2540494	2541667	277022	278163	SPBC409.04c	SPAC29E6.04	mis12	nnf1	-	SPAC30.08	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Obuse C (2004)	15502821	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247936	2540494	2542488	277022	278947	SPBC409.04c	SPAC29E6.10c	mis12	SPAC29E6.10c	-	SPAC30.14c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Obuse C (2004)	15502821	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247937	2540494	2542652	277022	279106	SPBC409.04c	SPAC1687.15	mis12	gsk3	-	skp1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Obuse C (2004)	15502821	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247938	2540494	2543482	277022	279902	SPBC409.04c	SPAC688.02c	mis12	mis14	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Obuse C (2004)	15502821	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247939	2543482	2540494	279902	277022	SPAC688.02c	SPBC409.04c	mis14	mis12	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Obuse C (2004)	15502821	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247943	2541047	2543482	277562	279902	SPBC409.09c	SPAC688.02c	mis13	mis14	cnl1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Obuse C (2004)	15502821	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247944	2543482	2540494	279902	277022	SPAC688.02c	SPBC409.04c	mis14	mis12	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Obuse C (2004)	15502821	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247945	2543482	2542652	279902	279106	SPAC688.02c	SPAC1687.15	mis14	gsk3	-	skp1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Obuse C (2004)	15502821	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247946	2543482	2539155	279902	275727	SPAC688.02c	SPCC1020.02	mis14	spc7	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Obuse C (2004)	15502821	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247947	2543482	2541047	279902	277562	SPAC688.02c	SPBC409.09c	mis14	mis13	-	cnl1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Obuse C (2004)	15502821	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247948	2541047	2543482	277562	279902	SPBC409.09c	SPAC688.02c	mis13	mis14	cnl1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Obuse C (2004)	15502821	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247949	2543482	2541667	279902	278163	SPAC688.02c	SPAC29E6.04	mis14	nnf1	-	SPAC30.08	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Obuse C (2004)	15502821	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247950	2541047	2542652	277562	279106	SPBC409.09c	SPAC1687.15	mis13	gsk3	cnl1	skp1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Obuse C (2004)	15502821	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247951	2541047	2539155	277562	275727	SPBC409.09c	SPCC1020.02	mis13	spc7	cnl1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Obuse C (2004)	15502821	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
247953	2539004	2543580	275578	279995	SPCC4G3.05c	SPAC644.14c	mus81	rad51	slx3	rhp51	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Doe CL (2004)	15486206	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247954	2539004	2543086	275578	279519	SPCC4G3.05c	SPAC30D11.10	mus81	rad52	slx3	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Doe CL (2004)	15486206	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247955	3361330	2540802	280406	277321	SPBC20F10.04c	SPBC1921.02	nse4	rad60	rad62	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Morikawa H (2004)	15485909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247956	3361330	2541071	280406	277586	SPBC20F10.04c	SPBC582.05c	nse4	brc1	rad62	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Morikawa H (2004)	15485909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247957	3361330	2539020	280406	275593	SPBC20F10.04c	SPCC5E4.06	nse4	smc6	rad62	rad18	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Morikawa H (2004)	15485909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247958	3361330	2541620	280406	278117	SPBC20F10.04c	SPAC2G11.12	nse4	rqh1	rad62	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Morikawa H (2004)	15485909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247959	3361330	2543577	280406	279992	SPBC20F10.04c	SPAC4H3.05	nse4	srs2	rad62	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Morikawa H (2004)	15485909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247960	3361330	2539004	280406	275578	SPBC20F10.04c	SPCC4G3.05c	nse4	mus81	rad62	slx3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Morikawa H (2004)	15485909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247961	3361330	2541051	280406	277566	SPBC20F10.04c	SPBC3E7.08c	nse4	rad13	rad62	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Morikawa H (2004)	15485909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247962	3361330	2539686	280406	276241	SPBC20F10.04c	SPBC1734.06	nse4	rhp18	rad62	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Morikawa H (2004)	15485909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247963	3361330	2538760	280406	275343	SPBC20F10.04c	SPCC970.01	nse4	rad16	rad62	rad10|rad20|swi9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Morikawa H (2004)	15485909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247964	2541318	2540368	277830	276897	SPBP23A10.08	SPBC36.05c	alp5	clr6	arp4	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Minoda A (2005)	15483052	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	the growth defect of alp5-1134 at 32C was rescued significantly by clr6-1	-	BIOGRID
247966	2541318	2540368	277830	276897	SPBP23A10.08	SPBC36.05c	alp5	clr6	arp4	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Minoda A (2005)	15483052	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue	in the alp5-1134/clr6-1 double mutant, the level of H4 tail acetylation became mutually compromised at 36C and almost comparable with those of the wild-type cells	-	BIOGRID
247967	2541194	2540719	277708	277242	SPBC725.13c	SPBC216.05	psf2	rad3	bsh3|dre13	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Gomez EB (2005)	15466421	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247968	2541194	2539087	277708	275659	SPBC725.13c	SPCC1259.13	psf2	chk1	bsh3|dre13	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gomez EB (2005)	15466421	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
247969	2540574	2539004	277101	275578	SPBC409.03	SPCC4G3.05c	swi5	mus81	-	slx3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ellermeier C (2004)	15466419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247970	2540283	2541055	276814	277570	SPBC1A4.02c	SPBC409.07c	leu1	wis1	SPBC1E8.07c	smf2|spc2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Weisman R (2005)	15466417	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	loss of function of either wis1 or spc1 suppressed sensitivity of leucine auxotrophs to rapamycin (CHEBI 9168 CID 5284616)	-	BIOGRID
247971	2540283	2541652	276814	278148	SPBC1A4.02c	SPAC24B11.06c	leu1	sty1	SPBC1E8.07c	phh1|spc1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Weisman R (2005)	15466417	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	loss of function of either wis1 or spc1 suppressed sensitivity of leucine auxotrophs to rapamycin (CHEBI 9168 CID 5284616)	-	BIOGRID
247972	2540728	2538959	277251	275533	SPBC216.06c	SPCC18B5.11c	swi1	cds1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sommariva E (2005)	15767681	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to MMS (CID 4156 CHEBI 25255)	-	BIOGRID
247973	2540728	2539087	277251	275659	SPBC216.06c	SPCC1259.13	swi1	chk1	-	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sommariva E (2005)	15767681	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to MMS (CID 4156 CHEBI 25255)	-	BIOGRID
247974	3361323	2538959	280399	275533	SPBC30D10.04	SPCC18B5.11c	swi3	cds1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sommariva E (2005)	15767681	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to MMS (CID 4156 CHEBI 25255)	-	BIOGRID
247975	3361323	2539087	280399	275659	SPBC30D10.04	SPCC1259.13	swi3	chk1	-	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sommariva E (2005)	15767681	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to MMS (CID 4156 CHEBI 25255)	-	BIOGRID
247978	2539087	3361323	275659	280399	SPCC1259.13	SPBC30D10.04	chk1	swi3	rad27	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sommariva E (2005)	15767681	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle|septum formation	double mutants display the cut phenotype and septation defects	-	BIOGRID
247979	2539087	2540728	275659	277251	SPCC1259.13	SPBC216.06c	chk1	swi1	rad27	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sommariva E (2005)	15767681	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle|septum formation	double mutants display the cut phenotype and septation defects	-	BIOGRID
247980	2538959	3361323	275533	280399	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC30D10.04	cds1	swi3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sommariva E (2005)	15767681	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	double mutants fail to undergo robust mitotic arrest	-	BIOGRID
247981	2540966	2540627	277482	277153	SPBC3D6.09	SPBC25H2.13c	dpb4	cdc20	-	pol2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Spiga MG (2004)	15388803	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247982	2540966	2543281	277482	279708	SPBC3D6.09	SPAC23C4.18c	dpb4	rad4	-	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Spiga MG (2004)	15388803	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247983	2540966	2542266	277482	278735	SPBC3D6.09	SPAC17D4.02	dpb4	cdc45	-	goa1|sna41	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Spiga MG (2004)	15388803	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247984	2540966	2539164	277482	275735	SPBC3D6.09	SPCC16A11.17	dpb4	mcm4	-	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Spiga MG (2004)	15388803	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247990	2543539	2539513	279956	276075	SPAC926.04c	SPCC645.05c	hsp90	myo2	git10|swo1	rng5	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Mishra M (2005)	15755919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247991	2543539	2539360	279956	275926	SPAC926.04c	SPCC613.04c	hsp90	rng3	git10|swo1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Mishra M (2005)	15755919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
247992	2542304	2539658	278771	276213	SPAC1687.20c	SPBC1105.17	mis6	cnp1	-	sim2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Hayashi T (2004)	15369671	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247993	2541321	2539658	277833	276213	SPBP22H7.09c	SPBC1105.17	mis15	cnp1	pi022|SPACTOKYO_453.12	sim2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Hayashi T (2004)	15369671	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247994	2539214	2539658	275784	276213	SPCC1672.10	SPBC1105.17	mis16	cnp1	-	sim2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Hayashi T (2004)	15369671	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247995	3361327	2539658	280403	276213	SPBC21.01	SPBC1105.17	mis17	cnp1	SPBC776.19	sim2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Hayashi T (2004)	15369671	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247996	2538763	2539658	275346	276213	SPCC970.12	SPBC1105.17	mis18	cnp1	-	sim2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Hayashi T (2004)	15369671	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247997	2543482	2540494	279902	277022	SPAC688.02c	SPBC409.04c	mis14	mis12	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Hayashi T (2004)	15369671	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247998	2540494	2543482	277022	279902	SPBC409.04c	SPAC688.02c	mis12	mis14	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Hayashi T (2004)	15369671	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
247999	2540494	2543482	277022	279902	SPBC409.04c	SPAC688.02c	mis12	mis14	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hayashi T (2004)	15369671	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248001	2543510	2543565	279928	279981	SPAC30D11.07	SPAPB24D3.04c	nth1	mag1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Alseth I (2005)	15722486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	double mutants show decreased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
248002	2543685	2543565	280099	279981	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAPB24D3.04c	rad55	mag1	rhp55	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Alseth I (2005)	15722486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	double mutants show decreased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
248006	2538959	2539087	275533	275659	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC1259.13	cds1	chk1	-	rad27	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Noguchi E (2004)	15367656	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248007	3361323	2539087	280399	275659	SPBC30D10.04	SPCC1259.13	swi3	chk1	-	rad27	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Noguchi E (2004)	15367656	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248008	2540728	2538959	277251	275533	SPBC216.06c	SPCC18B5.11c	swi1	cds1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Noguchi E (2004)	15367656	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248009	3361323	2538959	280399	275533	SPBC30D10.04	SPCC18B5.11c	swi3	cds1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Noguchi E (2004)	15367656	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248010	2540728	2539004	277251	275578	SPBC216.06c	SPCC4G3.05c	swi1	mus81	-	slx3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Noguchi E (2004)	15367656	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248011	3361323	2539004	280399	275578	SPBC30D10.04	SPCC4G3.05c	swi3	mus81	-	slx3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Noguchi E (2004)	15367656	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248012	2540728	2540255	277251	276786	SPBC216.06c	SPBC336.04	swi1	cdc6	-	mis10|pol3|pold	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Noguchi E (2004)	15367656	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248013	3361323	2540255	280399	276786	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC336.04	swi3	cdc6	-	mis10|pol3|pold	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Noguchi E (2004)	15367656	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248014	2539881	2540719	276427	277242	SPBC16G5.12c	SPBC216.05	top3	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Win TZ (2004)	15340008	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248015	2539881	2543289	276427	279714	SPBC16G5.12c	SPAC9E9.08	top3	rad26	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Win TZ (2004)	15340008	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248016	2540727	2538984	277250	275558	SPBC1921.03c	SPCC1753.05	mex67	rsm1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yoon JH (2004)	15357289	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248017	2543372	2541699	279794	278195	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAP8A3.08	ase1	cdc4	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yamashita A (2005)	15647375	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248018	2543372	2540737	279794	277260	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC19G7.05c	ase1	bgs1	-	cps1|drc1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yamashita A (2005)	15647375	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248019	2540389	2542233	276917	278705	SPBC31E1.03	SPAC1B3.12c	hub1	rpb10	ubl4	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yashiroda H (2004)	15569151	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
248020	2540389	2542774	276917	279223	SPBC31E1.03	SPAC167.03c	hub1	snu66	ubl4	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yashiroda H (2004)	15569151	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
248021	2538959	2540589	275533	277115	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC20F10.06	cds1	mad2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sugimoto I (2004)	15347659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size|resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
248029	2541849	2539087	278340	275659	SPAC20G8.01	SPCC1259.13	cdc17	chk1	SPAC57A10.13c	rad27	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Dunaway S (2005)	15585577	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248030	2540719	2543222	277242	279650	SPBC216.05	SPAC821.08c	rad3	slp1	-	cdc20	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sugimoto I (2004)	15347659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248031	2540719	2540589	277242	277115	SPBC216.05	SPBC20F10.06	rad3	mad2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sugimoto I (2004)	15347659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248032	2542150	2541635	278626	278131	SPAC17A5.11	SPAC1556.01c	rec12	rad50	spo11	SPAP4C9.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Farah JA (2005)	15654094	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiotic recombination:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248033	2542150	2542757	278626	279207	SPAC17A5.11	SPAC13C5.07	rec12	mre11	spo11	rad32	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Farah JA (2005)	15654094	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiotic recombination:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
248034	2539675	2540989	276230	277505	SPBC1718.03	SPBC3B9.07c	ker1	rpa43	-	rpa21	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Imazawa Y (2005)	15647272	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
248035	2539675	2542511	276230	278969	SPBC1718.03	SPAC18G6.11c	ker1	rrn3	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Imazawa Y (2005)	15647272	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
248037	2543387	2541620	279809	278117	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC2G11.12	mcl1	rqh1	slr3	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Williams DR (2005)	15643072	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248038	2543387	2541165	279809	277680	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC776.12c	mcl1	hsk1	slr3	cdc7	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Williams DR (2005)	15643072	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248039	2539027	2542029	275600	278511	SPCC1322.08	SPAC8E11.02c	srk1	rad24	mkp1	anr5|sam4	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Lopez-Aviles S (2005)	15629716	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:partial rescue|cell size:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248040	2540389	2542774	276917	279223	SPBC31E1.03	SPAC167.03c	hub1	snu66	ubl4	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wilkinson CR (2004)	15620657	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248041	2541729	2539221	278223	275791	SPAC22H12.02	SPCC1529.01	tfg3	SPCC1529.01	taf14	SPCC794.14	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kimura M (2004)	15616156	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
248042	2541729	2541000	278223	277516	SPAC22H12.02	SPBC3B8.09	tfg3	SPBC3B8.09	taf14	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kimura M (2004)	15616156	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
248043	2541729	2542086	278223	278563	SPAC22H12.02	SPAC25H1.02	tfg3	jmj1	taf14	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kimura M (2004)	15616156	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
248044	2541729	2539671	278223	276226	SPAC22H12.02	SPBC1734.11	tfg3	mas5	taf14	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kimura M (2004)	15616156	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
248045	2541729	2542196	278223	278671	SPAC22H12.02	SPAC30D11.13	tfg3	hus5	taf14	ubc9	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kimura M (2004)	15616156	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
248046	2540633	2539963	277159	276507	SPBC21D10.12	SPBC17F3.02	hob1	nak1	-	mor4|orb3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Huang TY (2005)	15615784	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
248047	2541599	2541661	278096	278157	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC6G10.12c	sid2	ace2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2006)	16415366	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248048	2539149	2541661	275721	278157	SPCC1739.11c	SPAC6G10.12c	cdc11	ace2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2006)	16415366	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248049	2542761	2541661	279211	278157	SPAC1565.06c	SPAC6G10.12c	spg1	ace2	sid3	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2006)	16415366	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248050	2540624	2541661	277150	278157	SPBC24C6.07	SPAC6G10.12c	cdc14	ace2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2006)	16415366	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248051	2542746	2541661	279196	278157	SPAC9G1.09	SPAC6G10.12c	sid1	ace2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2006)	16415366	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248052	2540845	2541661	277362	278157	SPBC428.13c	SPAC6G10.12c	mob1	ace2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2006)	16415366	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248055	2541599	2540029	278096	276573	SPAC24B11.11c	SPBC16A3.01	sid2	spn3	-	SPBC543.01c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2006)	16415366	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248056	2541599	2542193	278096	278668	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC9G1.11c	sid2	spn4	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2006)	16415366	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248057	2541599	2539407	278096	275972	SPAC24B11.11c	SPCC970.09	sid2	sec8	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2006)	16415366	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248058	2541599	3361511	278096	280587	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC23C4.08	sid2	rho3	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2006)	16415366	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248060	2541599	2539379	278096	275945	SPAC24B11.11c	SPCC188.02	sid2	par1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2006)	16415366	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248061	2541599	2542891	278096	279335	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC6F12.12	sid2	par2	-	pbp2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2006)	16415366	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248063	2541599	3361560	278096	280636	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC14C4.09	sid2	agn1	-	SPAC14C4.09	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2006)	16415366	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248064	2541599	2541612	278096	278109	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC1F7.04	sid2	rho1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2006)	16415366	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell death:undetermined	text only	-	BIOGRID
248065	2539823	2543139	276373	279571	SPBC16A3.18	SPAC12G12.03	cip1	cip2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Martin V (2006)	16407405	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|cell size	-	-	BIOGRID
248066	2540329	2539823	276859	276373	SPBC29B5.01	SPBC16A3.18	atf1	cip1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Martin V (2006)	16407405	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	oxidative stress resistance:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248067	2540329	2543139	276859	279571	SPBC29B5.01	SPAC12G12.03	atf1	cip2	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Martin V (2006)	16407405	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	oxidative stress resistance:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248068	2542151	2543139	278627	279571	SPAC17A2.09c	SPAC12G12.03	csx1	cip2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Martin V (2006)	16407405	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	oxidative stress resistance:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248069	2542151	2539823	278627	276373	SPAC17A2.09c	SPBC16A3.18	csx1	cip1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Martin V (2006)	16407405	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	oxidative stress resistance:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248070	2542313	2538930	278779	275506	SPAC16A10.07c	SPCC188.13c	taz1	dcr1	myb|myb1	SPCC584.10c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hansen KR (2006)	16407326	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	double mutants show an increase in tlh gene expression	-	BIOGRID
248071	2540936	2542123	277452	278599	SPBC800.05c	SPAC18G6.15	atb2	mal3	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Asakawa K (2006)	16394105	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248072	2540936	2538736	277452	275320	SPBC800.05c	SPCC1322.12c	atb2	bub1	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Asakawa K (2006)	16394105	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248073	2540936	2541856	277452	278347	SPBC800.05c	SPAC23H3.08c	atb2	bub3	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Asakawa K (2006)	16394105	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248074	2540936	2540320	277452	276850	SPBC800.05c	SPBC3D6.04c	atb2	mad1	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Asakawa K (2006)	16394105	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248075	2541293	2539869	277805	276415	SPBC9B6.10	SPBC11B10.09	cdc37	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Turnbull EL (2006)	16390871	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248076	2538731	2542949	275315	279389	SPCC1393.10	SPAC1142.05	ctr4	ctr5	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Beaudoin J (2006)	16385131	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248077	2541620	2540802	278117	277321	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC1921.02	rqh1	rad60	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Miyabe I (2006)	16354704	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248078	2540802	2542007	277321	278490	SPBC1921.02	SPAC20H4.07	rad60	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Miyabe I (2006)	16354704	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	Deletion of RHP57 partially rescues lethality in a RAD60/HUS2 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
248079	2541620	2542007	278117	278490	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC20H4.07	rqh1	rad57	hus2|rad12|rec9	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Miyabe I (2006)	16354704	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	Deletion of RHP57 partially rescues lethality in a RAD60/HUS2 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
248080	2541620	2543580	278117	279995	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC644.14c	rqh1	rad51	hus2|rad12|rec9	rhp51	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Miyabe I (2006)	16354704	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248081	2541022	2539580	277537	276139	SPBC3F6.05	SPCC645.07	rga1	rgf1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Mutoh T (2005)	16324155	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:partial rescue|cell wall morphology:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of rgf1 or rgf2 decreases the incidence of swollen, multi-septate, branched cells seen in an rga1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
248082	2540992	2539499	277508	276062	SPBC342.05	SPCC622.08c	crb2	hta1	rhp9	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2005)	16314498	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionizing radiation resistance:partial rescue	crb2 null cells are substantially more sensitive to IR than crb2/hta1,2-AQE cells|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
248083	2540992	2542226	277508	278699	SPBC342.05	SPAC19G12.06c	crb2	hta2	rhp9	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura TM (2005)	16314498	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionizing radiation resistance:partial rescue	crb2 null cells are substantially more sensitive to IR than crb2/hta1,2-AQE cells|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
248084	2541620	2540589	278117	277115	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC20F10.06	rqh1	mad2	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Win TZ (2005)	16303848	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248085	2541620	2539930	278117	276474	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC1198.11c	rqh1	reb1	hus2|rad12|rec9	SPBC660.01c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Win TZ (2005)	16303848	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248086	2540072	2538898	276610	275476	SPBC16H5.07c	SPCC4B3.16	ppa2	tip41	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Fenyvuesvolgyi C (2005)	16297994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in G2 phase:undetermined	When tip41 is overexpressed in a ppa2 mutant strain, the transition from G2 to G1 is no longer inhibited and most of the cells arrest in G1	-	BIOGRID
248087	2543645	2541660	280059	278156	SPAC607.09c	SPAC343.05	btn1	vma1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Gachet Y (2005)	16291725	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis|heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248088	2540127	2541149	276664	277664	SPBC106.20	SPBC651.03c	exo70	gyp10	SPBC582.02	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Morrell-Falvey JL (2005)	16291723	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248089	2541089	2542140	277604	278616	SPBC646.09c	SPAC1783.07c	int6	pap1	yin6	caf3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Jenkins CC (2005)	16278451	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type	The Int6CT-induced transcriptional profile is entirely Pap1-dependent	-	BIOGRID
248090	2540728	2541165	277251	277680	SPBC216.06c	SPBC776.12c	swi1	hsk1	-	cdc7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Matsumoto S (2005)	16263721	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248091	2541165	2540728	277680	277251	SPBC776.12c	SPBC216.06c	hsk1	swi1	cdc7	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Matsumoto S (2005)	16263721	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248092	2541165	2539087	277680	275659	SPBC776.12c	SPCC1259.13	hsk1	chk1	cdc7	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Matsumoto S (2005)	16263721	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248095	2542170	2542313	278645	278779	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC16A10.07c	mst2	taz1	-	myb|myb1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gomez EB (2005)	16199868	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248096	2542170	2539447	278645	276010	SPAC17G8.13c	SPCC338.17c	mst2	rad21	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gomez EB (2005)	16199868	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248097	2542170	2541165	278645	277680	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC776.12c	mst2	hsk1	-	cdc7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gomez EB (2005)	16199868	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248098	2542170	2541633	278645	278129	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC664.01c	mst2	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gomez EB (2005)	16199868	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248099	2542123	2538736	278599	275320	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC1322.12c	mal3	bub1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Asakawa K (2005)	16179942	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248100	2542123	2541856	278599	278347	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC23H3.08c	mal3	bub3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Asakawa K (2005)	16179942	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248101	2542123	2539219	278599	275789	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC1795.01c	mal3	mad3	-	SPCC895.02	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Asakawa K (2005)	16179942	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248102	2543048	3361385	279483	280461	SPAC3F10.02c	SPAC1639.02c	trk1	trk2	sptrk	SPAC1F5.12	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Thornton G (2005)	16164595	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	double mutants display sensitivity to a wider array of chemicals than single mutants	-	BIOGRID
248103	2541612	2542013	278109	278496	SPAC1F7.04	SPAC20H4.11c	rho1	rho5	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakano K (2005)	16146630	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248104	2540810	2539207	277329	275777	SPBC19C7.03	SPCC285.09c	cyr1	cgs2	git2	pde1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Wang L (2005)	16143612	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248105	2540617	2539781	277143	276331	SPBC21C3.20c	SPBC106.10	git1	pka1	-	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wang L (2005)	16143612	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248106	2540810	2539781	277329	276331	SPBC19C7.03	SPBC106.10	cyr1	pka1	git2	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wang L (2005)	16143612	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248107	2540810	2542677	277329	279130	SPBC19C7.03	SPAC26F1.10c	cyr1	pyp1	git2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wang L (2005)	16143612	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248108	2540810	2541652	277329	278148	SPBC19C7.03	SPAC24B11.06c	cyr1	sty1	git2	phh1|spc1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wang L (2005)	16143612	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248109	2540810	2543286	277329	279711	SPBC19C7.03	SPAC56F8.16	cyr1	esc1	git2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wang L (2005)	16143612	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248110	2540810	2541209	277329	277723	SPBC19C7.03	SPBC887.10	cyr1	mcs4	git2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wang L (2005)	16143612	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248111	2540810	2541867	277329	278357	SPBC19C7.03	SPAC22E12.14c	cyr1	sck2	git2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wang L (2005)	16143612	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248112	2539781	2543286	276331	279711	SPBC106.10	SPAC56F8.16	pka1	esc1	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wang L (2005)	16143612	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248113	2538770	2539207	275353	275777	SPCC1753.02c	SPCC285.09c	git3	cgs2	-	pde1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Wang L (2005)	16143612	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248114	2541720	2539207	278214	275777	SPAC23H3.13c	SPCC285.09c	gpa2	cgs2	git8	pde1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Wang L (2005)	16143612	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248115	2543086	2540244	279519	276776	SPAC30D11.10	SPBC336.01	rad52	fbh1	rad22|rad22A	fdh|fdh1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Osman F (2005)	16135800	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248116	2543577	2540244	279992	276776	SPAC4H3.05	SPBC336.01	srs2	fbh1	-	fdh|fdh1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Osman F (2005)	16135800	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248117	2540244	2543685	276776	280099	SPBC336.01	SPAC3C7.03c	fbh1	rad55	fdh|fdh1	rhp55	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Osman F (2005)	16135800	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248118	2543577	2543685	279992	280099	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC3C7.03c	srs2	rad55	-	rhp55	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Osman F (2005)	16135800	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	Deletion of RHP55 rescues growth of a FBH1/SRS2 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
248119	2541620	2543580	278117	279995	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC644.14c	rqh1	rad51	hus2|rad12|rec9	rhp51	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Osman F (2005)	16135800	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	Mutation of rad51 rescues the growth defect seen in a hus2/fbh1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
248120	2540244	2543580	276776	279995	SPBC336.01	SPAC644.14c	fbh1	rad51	fdh|fdh1	rhp51	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Osman F (2005)	16135800	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	Mutation of rad51 rescues the growth defect seen in a hus2/fbh1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
248121	2540244	2540574	276776	277101	SPBC336.01	SPBC409.03	fbh1	swi5	fdh|fdh1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Osman F (2005)	16135800	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248122	2540244	2543577	276776	279992	SPBC336.01	SPAC4H3.05	fbh1	srs2	fdh|fdh1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Morishita T (2005)	16135799	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248123	2540244	2541620	276776	278117	SPBC336.01	SPAC2G11.12	fbh1	rqh1	fdh|fdh1	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Morishita T (2005)	16135799	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248124	2540244	2542007	276776	278490	SPBC336.01	SPAC20H4.07	fbh1	rad57	fdh|fdh1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Morishita T (2005)	16135799	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	Deletion of RHP57 rescues the growth defect seen in an FBH1/SRS2 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
248125	2543577	2542007	279992	278490	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC20H4.07	srs2	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Morishita T (2005)	16135799	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	Deletion of RHP57 rescues the growth defect seen in an FBH1/SRS2 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
248126	2541620	2542007	278117	278490	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC20H4.07	rqh1	rad57	hus2|rad12|rec9	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Morishita T (2005)	16135799	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
248127	2541185	2543413	277699	279835	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC4F8.12c	prp1	spp42	zer1	cwf6	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bottner CA (2005)	16133344	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248128	2541185	2543676	277699	280090	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC9.03c	prp1	brr2	zer1	spp41	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bottner CA (2005)	16133344	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248129	2542150	2543164	278626	279595	SPAC17A5.11	SPAC3G6.06c	rec12	rad2	spo11	fen1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Farah JA (2005)	16118186	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic recombination:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
248130	2541869	3361406	278359	280482	SPAC22F3.13	SPAC19E9.03	tsc1	pas1	-	SPAC57A10.01	Dosage Rescue	genetic	van Slegtenhorst M (2005)	16115814	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248131	2543339	3361406	279762	280482	SPAC630.13c	SPAC19E9.03	tsc2	pas1	-	SPAC57A10.01	Dosage Rescue	genetic	van Slegtenhorst M (2005)	16115814	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248132	2541869	2540853	278359	277370	SPAC22F3.13	SPBC428.16c	tsc1	rhb1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	van Slegtenhorst M (2005)	16115814	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient uptake:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Rhb1G63D/S165N mutant can rescue arginine uptake in tsc1 mutants	-	BIOGRID
248133	2541293	2543539	277805	279956	SPBC9B6.10	SPAC926.04c	cdc37	hsp90	-	git10|swo1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Turnbull EL (2005)	16098195	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248134	2540115	2542313	276652	278779	SPBC1778.02	SPAC16A10.07c	rap1	taz1	-	myb|myb1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Miller KM (2005)	16096639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248135	2540115	2542144	276652	278620	SPBC1778.02	SPAC6F6.17	rap1	rif1	-	SPAPJ736.01|tap1|tap11	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Miller KM (2005)	16096639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of rif1 partially rescues the growth defect of a taz1/rap1 double mutant at 20 degrees|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
248136	2542313	2542144	278779	278620	SPAC16A10.07c	SPAC6F6.17	taz1	rif1	myb|myb1	SPAPJ736.01|tap1|tap11	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Miller KM (2005)	16096639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of rif1 partially rescues the growth defect of a taz1/rap1 double mutant at 20 degrees|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
248137	2540115	2540541	276652	277068	SPBC1778.02	SPBC1A4.03c	rap1	top2	-	ptr11	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Miller KM (2005)	16096639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	genetic complex|mutation of top2 partially rescues the growth defect of a taz1/rap1 double mutant at 20 degrees	-	BIOGRID
248138	2542313	2540541	278779	277068	SPAC16A10.07c	SPBC1A4.03c	taz1	top2	myb|myb1	ptr11	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Miller KM (2005)	16096639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	genetic complex|mutation of top2 partially rescues the growth defect of a taz1/rap1 double mutant at 20 degrees	-	BIOGRID
248139	2542184	2539686	278659	276241	SPAC17C9.13c	SPBC1734.06	cut8	rhp18	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Takeda K (2005)	16096059	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248141	2540361	2542489	276890	278948	SPBC2F12.13	SPAC589.08c	klp5	dam1	sot1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sanchez-Perez I (2005)	16079915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248142	2540361	2540498	276890	277026	SPBC2F12.13	SPBC27.02c	klp5	ask1	sot1	mug181	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sanchez-Perez I (2005)	16079915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248143	2540361	2542311	276890	278777	SPBC2F12.13	SPAC16A10.05c	klp5	dad1	sot1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sanchez-Perez I (2005)	16079915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248144	2539700	2542489	276253	278948	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC589.08c	klp6	dam1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sanchez-Perez I (2005)	16079915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248145	2539700	2540498	276253	277026	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC27.02c	klp6	ask1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	mug181	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sanchez-Perez I (2005)	16079915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248146	2539700	2542311	276253	278777	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC16A10.05c	klp6	dad1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sanchez-Perez I (2005)	16079915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248147	2542737	2542489	279187	278948	SPAC25B8.14	SPAC589.08c	mal2	dam1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sanchez-Perez I (2005)	16079915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248148	2542737	2540498	279187	277026	SPAC25B8.14	SPBC27.02c	mal2	ask1	-	mug181	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sanchez-Perez I (2005)	16079915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248149	2542737	2542311	279187	278777	SPAC25B8.14	SPAC16A10.05c	mal2	dad1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sanchez-Perez I (2005)	16079915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248150	2542304	2542489	278771	278948	SPAC1687.20c	SPAC589.08c	mis6	dam1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sanchez-Perez I (2005)	16079915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248151	2542304	2540498	278771	277026	SPAC1687.20c	SPBC27.02c	mis6	ask1	-	mug181	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sanchez-Perez I (2005)	16079915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248152	2539658	2542311	276213	278777	SPBC1105.17	SPAC16A10.05c	cnp1	dad1	sim2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sanchez-Perez I (2005)	16079915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248153	2543510	2540679	279928	277204	SPAC30D11.07	SPBC3D6.10	nth1	apn2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sugimoto T (2005)	16076563	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	double mutant show reduced sensitivity to MMS (CID 4156 CHEBI 25255)	-	BIOGRID
248154	2540707	2540880	277230	277397	SPBC19C2.01	SPBC582.03	cdc28	cdc13	prp8|SPBC21B10.01c|SPBC874.01	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Shimada M (2005)	16049013	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248155	2543278	2539123	279706	275695	SPAPJ698.03c	SPCC18B5.03	prp12	wee1	sap130|SF3b130	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Shimada M (2005)	16049013	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248156	2543278	2541972	279706	278457	SPAPJ698.03c	SPAC23C11.11	prp12	cka1	sap130|SF3b130	orb5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Shimada M (2005)	16049013	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248157	2543278	2542029	279706	278511	SPAPJ698.03c	SPAC8E11.02c	prp12	rad24	sap130|SF3b130	anr5|sam4	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Shimada M (2005)	16049013	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248158	2540707	2539123	277230	275695	SPBC19C2.01	SPCC18B5.03	cdc28	wee1	prp8|SPBC21B10.01c|SPBC874.01	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Shimada M (2005)	16049013	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248159	2540707	2541972	277230	278457	SPBC19C2.01	SPAC23C11.11	cdc28	cka1	prp8|SPBC21B10.01c|SPBC874.01	orb5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Shimada M (2005)	16049013	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248160	2540707	2542029	277230	278511	SPBC19C2.01	SPAC8E11.02c	cdc28	rad24	prp8|SPBC21B10.01c|SPBC874.01	anr5|sam4	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Shimada M (2005)	16049013	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248161	2542277	2541972	278746	278457	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC23C11.11	dbr1	cka1	-	orb5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Shimada M (2005)	16049013	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248162	2542277	2542029	278746	278511	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC8E11.02c	dbr1	rad24	-	anr5|sam4	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Shimada M (2005)	16049013	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248163	2542277	2539123	278746	275695	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC18B5.03	dbr1	wee1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Shimada M (2005)	16049013	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248164	2540426	2540215	276954	276748	SPBC23E6.07c	SPBC83.14c	rfc1	rfc5	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kim J (2005)	16040599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
248165	2540426	2541270	276954	277784	SPBC23E6.07c	SPBC902.02c	rfc1	ctf18	-	chl12	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kim J (2005)	16040599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248166	2540426	2543078	276954	279511	SPBC23E6.07c	SPAC31A2.15c	rfc1	dcc1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kim J (2005)	16040599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248167	2540426	2541276	276954	277790	SPBC23E6.07c	SPBC947.11c	rfc1	elg1	-	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Kim J (2005)	16040599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248168	2541418	2539761	277924	276312	SPAC22A12.07c	SPBC16C6.09	ogm1	ogm4	oma1	oma4	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Willer T (2005)	15948957	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248169	2543082	2543058	279515	279492	SPAC3C7.08c	SPAC3G6.02	elf1	rpn15	-	dss1|sem1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Thakurta AG (2005)	15990877	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248170	2543058	2540727	279492	277250	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC1921.03c	rpn15	mex67	dss1|sem1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Thakurta AG (2005)	15990877	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248171	2540565	2540727	277092	277250	SPBC1D7.04	SPBC1921.03c	mlo3	mex67	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Thakurta AG (2005)	15990877	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248172	2543336	2539537	279759	276099	SPAC688.11	SPCP1E11.04c	end4	pal1	sla2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ge W (2005)	15975911	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248173	2539047	2539537	275620	276099	SPCC1223.06	SPCP1E11.04c	tea1	pal1	alp8	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ge W (2005)	15975911	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248176	2539020	2541071	275593	277586	SPCC5E4.06	SPBC582.05c	smc6	brc1	rad18	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Sheedy DM (2005)	15972456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	brc1 rescues sensitivity to MMS in an smc6 mutant	-	BIOGRID
248177	2539020	2541657	275593	278153	SPCC5E4.06	SPAP27G11.15	smc6	slx1	rad18	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sheedy DM (2005)	15972456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|resistance to chemicals	the smc6-74/slx1 double mutant shows severe sensitivity to MMS (CID 4156 CHEBI 25255)	-	BIOGRID
248178	2539928	2539426	276472	275991	SPBC1604.08c	SPCC962.03c	imp1	cut15	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Umeda M (2005)	15937127	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248179	2539928	2539426	276472	275991	SPBC1604.08c	SPCC962.03c	imp1	cut15	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Umeda M (2005)	15937127	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248180	2542231	2541439	278704	277944	SPAC19G12.14	SPAC22F8.11	its3	plc1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Deng L (2005)	15923187	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248181	2542231	2540737	278704	277260	SPAC19G12.14	SPBC19G7.05c	its3	bgs1	-	cps1|drc1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Deng L (2005)	15923187	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248182	2542231	2539649	278704	276204	SPAC19G12.14	SPBC12D12.04c	its3	pck2	-	pkc1|sts6	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Deng L (2005)	15923187	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248183	2542231	2541439	278704	277944	SPAC19G12.14	SPAC22F8.11	its3	plc1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Deng L (2005)	15923187	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	overexpression of plc1 rescues growth of its3 in response to high temperature, micafungin (CHEBI 600520 CID 3081921) or FK506 (CHEBI: 61049 CID: 445643)	-	BIOGRID
248184	2539649	2542293	276204	278761	SPBC12D12.04c	SPAC17G8.14c	pck2	pck1	pkc1|sts6	SPAC22H10.01c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Deng L (2005)	15923187	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	genetic complex|overexpression of pck1 suppresses the micafungin sensitivity of a plc1/pck2 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
248185	2543387	2543164	279809	279595	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC3G6.06c	mcl1	rad2	slr3	fen1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tsutsui Y (2005)	15915339	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248186	2543629	2543387	280043	279809	SPAC3H5.06c	SPAPB1E7.02c	pol1	mcl1	polA|swi7	slr3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tsutsui Y (2005)	15915339	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248187	2543387	2540148	279809	276685	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC16D10.04c	mcl1	dna2	slr3	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tsutsui Y (2005)	15915339	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248188	2540148	2543580	276685	279995	SPBC16D10.04c	SPAC644.14c	dna2	rad51	-	rhp51	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tsutsui Y (2005)	15915339	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248189	2543580	2543387	279995	279809	SPAC644.14c	SPAPB1E7.02c	rad51	mcl1	rhp51	slr3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tsutsui Y (2005)	15915339	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248190	2542363	2543064	278827	279497	SPAC1783.05	SPAC3G6.01	hrp1	hrp3	chd1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Walfridsson J (2005)	15908586	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248191	2542363	2542304	278827	278771	SPAC1783.05	SPAC1687.20c	hrp1	mis6	chd1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Walfridsson J (2005)	15908586	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248193	2540718	2541929	277241	278417	SPBC3H7.15	SPAC23C4.12	hhp1	hhp2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Petronczki M (2006)	16990132	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248194	2539869	2542358	276415	278823	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC1782.09c	cdc2	clp1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	flp1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Wolfe BA (2006)	16950131	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248196	2539497	2539505	276060	276068	SPCC895.07	SPCC736.14	alp14	dis1	mtc1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Aoki K (2006)	16920624	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	whereas Dis1(6A) can partially rescue the phenotype resulting form deletion of Mtc1/Alp14	-	BIOGRID
248197	2539639	2540025	276194	276569	SPBC106.09	SPBC16G5.01	cut4	rpn12	apc1	SPBC342.07|mts3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ikai N (2006)	16904908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248198	2542744	2539641	279194	276196	SPAC1565.08	SPBC14C8.01c	cdc48	cut2	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	SPBC1815.02c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ikai N (2006)	16904908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248199	2542744	2539442	279194	276005	SPAC1565.08	SPCC5E4.04	cdc48	cut1	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	ptr4	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ikai N (2006)	16904908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248201	2540580	2540720	277106	277243	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC216.07c	ran1	tor2	pat1	SPBC646.01c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Alvarez B (2006)	17046992	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	overexpression of tor2 rescues meiosis in a ran1 mutant allowing cells to proliferate	-	BIOGRID
248202	2540720	2539640	277243	276195	SPBC216.07c	SPBC32F12.09	tor2	rum1	SPBC646.01c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Alvarez B (2006)	17046992	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type	deletion of rum1 or ste9 blocks the G1 arrest caused by Tor2 inactivation	-	BIOGRID
248203	2540720	2542824	277243	279271	SPBC216.07c	SPAC144.13c	tor2	srw1	SPBC646.01c	ste9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Alvarez B (2006)	17046992	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type	deletion of rum1 or ste9 blocks the G1 arrest caused by Tor2 inactivation	-	BIOGRID
248208	2539047	2542793	275620	279241	SPCC1223.06	SPAC6F6.06c	tea1	rax2	alp8	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Choi E (2006)	17085965	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248209	2539971	2540470	276515	276998	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC29A10.15	cbp1	orc1	abp1	cdc30|orp1|rid1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Locovei AM (2006)	17112379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to high temperatures	-	BIOGRID
248210	2539971	2540255	276515	276786	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC336.04	cbp1	cdc6	abp1	mis10|pol3|pold	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Locovei AM (2006)	17112379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to high temperatures	-	BIOGRID
248211	2539971	2542083	276515	278560	SPBC1105.04c	SPAC27E2.05	cbp1	cdc1	abp1	mis1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Locovei AM (2006)	17112379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to high temperatures	-	BIOGRID
248212	2539971	2542266	276515	278735	SPBC1105.04c	SPAC17D4.02	cbp1	cdc45	abp1	goa1|sna41	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Locovei AM (2006)	17112379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to high temperatures	-	BIOGRID
248213	2539971	2539164	276515	275735	SPBC1105.04c	SPCC16A11.17	cbp1	mcm4	abp1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Locovei AM (2006)	17112379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to high temperatures	-	BIOGRID
248214	2539971	2540013	276515	276557	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC14C8.07c	cbp1	cdc18	abp1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Locovei AM (2006)	17112379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to high temperatures	-	BIOGRID
248215	2539971	2540627	276515	277153	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC25H2.13c	cbp1	cdc20	abp1	pol2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Locovei AM (2006)	17112379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to high temperatures	-	BIOGRID
248216	2539838	2539728	276387	276280	SPBC1347.10	SPBC14F5.12c	cdc23	cbh2	mcm10	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Locovei AM (2006)	17112379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	cbh1/cbh2/cdc23 triple mutants show reduced restrictive temperature|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
248217	2539838	2543290	276387	279715	SPBC1347.10	SPAC9E9.10c	cdc23	cbh1	mcm10	cbh	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Locovei AM (2006)	17112379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	cbh1/cbh2/cdc23 triple mutants show reduced restrictive temperature|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
248218	2539971	2543290	276515	279715	SPBC1105.04c	SPAC9E9.10c	cbp1	cbh1	abp1	cbh	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Locovei AM (2006)	17112379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248219	2543290	2539728	279715	276280	SPAC9E9.10c	SPBC14F5.12c	cbh1	cbh2	cbh	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Locovei AM (2006)	17112379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	double mutant show a slightly elongated cell shape	-	BIOGRID
248220	2539838	2539971	276387	276515	SPBC1347.10	SPBC1105.04c	cdc23	cbp1	mcm10	abp1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Locovei AM (2006)	17112379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248221	2539971	2539728	276515	276280	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC14F5.12c	cbp1	cbh2	abp1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Locovei AM (2006)	17112379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	double mutant show a slightly elongated cell shape	-	BIOGRID
248222	2539971	2543290	276515	279715	SPBC1105.04c	SPAC9E9.10c	cbp1	cbh1	abp1	cbh	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Locovei AM (2006)	17112379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|septum formation	double mutants show a highly elongated cell shape and a multi-septate phenotype	-	BIOGRID
248223	2543289	2542029	279714	278511	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC8E11.02c	rad26	rad24	-	anr5|sam4	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Baschal EE (2006)	16930478	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
248224	2540156	2542084	276692	278561	SPBC17A3.07	SPAC7D4.07c	pgr1	trx1	pi039	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Song JY (2006)	16950927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
248225	2543399	2542123	279821	278599	SPAC3G9.12	SPAC18G6.15	peg1	mal3	cls1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Grallert A (2006)	16951255	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248227	2541727	2543628	278221	280042	SPAC22H10.12c	SPAC3H8.10	gdi1	spo20	sec19	sec14	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ma Y (2006)	16980382	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248228	2541727	2543628	278221	280042	SPAC22H10.12c	SPAC3H8.10	gdi1	spo20	sec19	sec14	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ma Y (2006)	16980382	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
248229	2540473	2540853	277001	277370	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC428.16c	tor1	rhb1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Uritani M (2006)	17121544	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248230	2540473	2543339	277001	279762	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC630.13c	tor1	tsc2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Uritani M (2006)	17121544	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248231	2540473	2540720	277001	277243	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC216.07c	tor1	tor2	-	SPBC646.01c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Uritani M (2006)	17121544	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248232	2538959	2539087	275533	275659	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC1259.13	cds1	chk1	-	rad27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Noguchi C (2007)	17151242	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle|resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
248233	2539285	2539087	275853	275659	SPCC1672.02c	SPCC1259.13	sap1	chk1	-	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi C (2007)	17151242	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248234	2539285	2540719	275853	277242	SPCC1672.02c	SPBC216.05	sap1	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi C (2007)	17151242	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248235	3361323	2539285	280399	275853	SPBC30D10.04	SPCC1672.02c	swi3	sap1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Noguchi C (2007)	17151242	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
248236	2539047	2540792	275620	277311	SPCC1223.06	SPBC4F6.06	tea1	kin1	alp8	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	La Carbona S (2006)	16988828	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis|septum formation	double mutants show abnormal septum formation and binucleate compartments suggesting a cytokinesis defect	-	BIOGRID
248237	2539047	2540792	275620	277311	SPCC1223.06	SPBC4F6.06	tea1	kin1	alp8	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	La Carbona S (2006)	16988828	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248238	2540792	2541889	277311	278379	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC2F7.03c	kin1	pom1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	La Carbona S (2006)	16988828	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis|septum formation	double mutants fail to undergo cytokinesis and exhibit aberrant septum formation and polyploid cell compartments	-	BIOGRID
248239	2541889	2540792	278379	277311	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC4F6.06	pom1	kin1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	La Carbona S (2006)	16988828	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248240	2541474	2542266	277976	278735	SPAC227.16c	SPAC17D4.02	psf3	cdc45	-	goa1|sna41	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yabuuchi H (2006)	16990792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show decreased restrictive temperature	-	BIOGRID
248241	2541474	2542628	277976	279082	SPAC227.16c	SPAC24H6.06	psf3	sld3	-	mug175	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yabuuchi H (2006)	16990792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show decreased restrictive temperature	-	BIOGRID
248242	2541474	2540627	277976	277153	SPAC227.16c	SPBC25H2.13c	psf3	cdc20	-	pol2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yabuuchi H (2006)	16990792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show decreased restrictive temperature	-	BIOGRID
248243	2541474	2543281	277976	279708	SPAC227.16c	SPAC23C4.18c	psf3	rad4	-	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yabuuchi H (2006)	16990792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show decreased restrictive temperature	-	BIOGRID
248245	2541474	2541194	277976	277708	SPAC227.16c	SPBC725.13c	psf3	psf2	-	bsh3|dre13	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yabuuchi H (2006)	16990792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	double mutants show reduced sensitivity to heat	-	BIOGRID
248246	2541474	2541324	277976	277836	SPAC227.16c	SPBP23A10.09	psf3	psf1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yabuuchi H (2006)	16990792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	double mutants show reduced sensitivity to heat	-	BIOGRID
248247	2541474	2541368	277976	277879	SPAC227.16c	SPBP4H10.21c	psf3	sld5	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yabuuchi H (2006)	16990792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	double mutants show reduced sensitivity to heat	-	BIOGRID
248248	2539527	2543387	276089	279809	SPCC338.16	SPAPB1E7.02c	pof3	mcl1	-	slr3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Mamnun YM (2006)	16997270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248249	2540494	2539971	277022	276515	SPBC409.04c	SPBC1105.04c	mis12	cbp1	-	abp1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fedyanina OS (2006)	17004072	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
248250	2540589	2539669	277115	276224	SPBC20F10.06	SPBC11C11.04c	mad2	alp1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fedyanina OS (2006)	17004072	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248251	2539920	2542293	276464	278761	SPBC119.08	SPAC17G8.14c	pmk1	pck1	spm1	SPAC22H10.01c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ma Y (2006)	17005909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of pck1 rescues the sensitivity to micafungin seen in a pmk1 or mkh1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
248253	2542773	2542293	279222	278761	SPAC16.01	SPAC17G8.14c	rho2	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ma Y (2006)	17005909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to micafungin	-	BIOGRID
248254	2539649	2539920	276204	276464	SPBC12D12.04c	SPBC119.08	pck2	pmk1	pkc1|sts6	spm1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ma Y (2006)	17005909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	deletion rescues the lethality caused by overexpression of rho2 or pck2	-	BIOGRID
248255	2539649	2540919	276204	277435	SPBC12D12.04c	SPBC543.07	pck2	pek1	pkc1|sts6	mkk1|skh1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ma Y (2006)	17005909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	deletion rescues the lethality caused by overexpression of rho2 or pck2	-	BIOGRID
248256	2539649	2542175	276204	278650	SPBC12D12.04c	SPAC1F3.02c	pck2	mkh1	pkc1|sts6	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ma Y (2006)	17005909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	deletion rescues the lethality caused by overexpression of rho2 or pck2	-	BIOGRID
248257	2542773	2539920	279222	276464	SPAC16.01	SPBC119.08	rho2	pmk1	-	spm1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ma Y (2006)	17005909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	deletion rescues the lethality caused by overexpression of rho2 or pck2	-	BIOGRID
248258	2542773	2540919	279222	277435	SPAC16.01	SPBC543.07	rho2	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ma Y (2006)	17005909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	deletion rescues the lethality caused by overexpression of rho2 or pck2	-	BIOGRID
248259	2542773	2542175	279222	278650	SPAC16.01	SPAC1F3.02c	rho2	mkh1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ma Y (2006)	17005909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	deletion rescues the lethality caused by overexpression of rho2 or pck2	-	BIOGRID
248261	2540024	2539920	276568	276464	SPBP4H10.04	SPBC119.08	ppb1	pmk1	SPBC1346.01c	spm1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ma Y (2006)	17005909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionic stress resistance:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	the knockout of pmk1, pek1, mkh1, or pck2 all complemented the Cl- hypersensitive phenotype of ppb1 knock out	-	BIOGRID
248262	2540024	2540919	276568	277435	SPBP4H10.04	SPBC543.07	ppb1	pek1	SPBC1346.01c	mkk1|skh1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ma Y (2006)	17005909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionic stress resistance:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	the knockout of pmk1, pek1, mkh1, or pck2 all complemented the Cl- hypersensitive phenotype of ppb1 knock out	-	BIOGRID
248263	2540024	2542175	276568	278650	SPBP4H10.04	SPAC1F3.02c	ppb1	mkh1	SPBC1346.01c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ma Y (2006)	17005909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionic stress resistance:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	the knockout of pmk1, pek1, mkh1, or pck2 all complemented the Cl- hypersensitive phenotype of ppb1 knock out	-	BIOGRID
248264	2540024	2539649	276568	276204	SPBP4H10.04	SPBC12D12.04c	ppb1	pck2	SPBC1346.01c	pkc1|sts6	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ma Y (2006)	17005909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionic stress resistance:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	the knockout of pmk1, pek1, mkh1, or pck2 all complemented the Cl- hypersensitive phenotype of ppb1 knock out	-	BIOGRID
248265	2542184	2541657	278659	278153	SPAC17C9.13c	SPAP27G11.15	cut8	slx1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kearsey SE (2007)	17178839	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248266	2541620	2542184	278117	278659	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC17C9.13c	rqh1	cut8	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kearsey SE (2007)	17178839	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248267	2543685	2540719	280099	277242	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC216.05	rad55	rad3	rhp55	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kearsey SE (2007)	17178839	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
248268	2541620	2540719	278117	277242	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC216.05	rqh1	rad3	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kearsey SE (2007)	17178839	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248269	2540473	2541869	277001	278359	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC22F3.13	tor1	tsc1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Weisman R (2007)	17179073	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248270	2540473	2543339	277001	279762	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC630.13c	tor1	tsc2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Weisman R (2007)	17179073	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
248271	2540473	2543339	277001	279762	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC630.13c	tor1	tsc2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Weisman R (2007)	17179073	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	-	-	BIOGRID
248272	2543339	2541195	279762	277709	SPAC630.13c	SPBC839.17c	tsc2	fkh1	-	SPBC24E9.17c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Weisman R (2007)	17179073	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
248274	2538959	2540802	275533	277321	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC1921.02	cds1	rad60	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Raffa GD (2006)	16880212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248275	2538959	2540802	275533	277321	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC1921.02	cds1	rad60	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Raffa GD (2006)	16880212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248276	2538959	2540802	275533	277321	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC1921.02	cds1	rad60	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Raffa GD (2006)	16880212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248277	2540802	2540802	277321	277321	SPBC1921.02	SPBC1921.02	rad60	rad60	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Raffa GD (2006)	16880212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248278	2543390	2542679	279812	279132	SPAC631.01c	SPAC12B10.07	acp2	acp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nakano K (2006)	16866873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248279	2543390	2542679	279812	279132	SPAC631.01c	SPAC12B10.07	acp2	acp1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Nakano K (2006)	16866873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248280	2540589	2542655	277115	279109	SPBC20F10.06	SPAC3A11.14c	mad2	pkl1	-	SPAC3H5.03c|klp1	Co-localization	physical	Mayer C (2006)	16855399	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248281	2540589	2540223	277115	276756	SPBC20F10.06	SPBC32F12.04	mad2	gtb1	-	tug1	Co-localization	physical	Mayer C (2006)	16855399	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248282	2540392	2540589	276920	277115	SPBC365.15	SPBC20F10.06	alp4	mad2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mayer C (2006)	16855399	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248283	2540690	2540589	277215	277115	SPBC428.20c	SPBC20F10.06	alp6	mad2	SPBC902.01c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mayer C (2006)	16855399	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248284	2540392	2540690	276920	277215	SPBC365.15	SPBC428.20c	alp4	alp6	-	SPBC902.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Mayer C (2006)	16855399	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248285	2540690	2540392	277215	276920	SPBC428.20c	SPBC365.15	alp6	alp4	SPBC902.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Mayer C (2006)	16855399	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248286	2540392	2540223	276920	276756	SPBC365.15	SPBC32F12.04	alp4	gtb1	-	tug1	Two-hybrid	physical	Mayer C (2006)	16855399	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248287	2540392	2540589	276920	277115	SPBC365.15	SPBC20F10.06	alp4	mad2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Mayer C (2006)	16855399	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248288	2542737	2542367	279187	278831	SPAC25B8.14	SPAC1783.03	mal2	fta2	-	sma2	Co-localization	physical	Kerres A (2006)	16855021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248289	2542367	2542737	278831	279187	SPAC1783.03	SPAC25B8.14	fta2	mal2	sma2	-	Co-localization	physical	Kerres A (2006)	16855021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248290	2542367	2539155	278831	275727	SPAC1783.03	SPCC1020.02	fta2	spc7	sma2	-	Co-localization	physical	Kerres A (2006)	16855021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248291	2542367	2542304	278831	278771	SPAC1783.03	SPAC1687.20c	fta2	mis6	sma2	-	Co-localization	physical	Kerres A (2006)	16855021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248292	2542367	2541321	278831	277833	SPAC1783.03	SPBP22H7.09c	fta2	mis15	sma2	pi022|SPACTOKYO_453.12	Co-localization	physical	Kerres A (2006)	16855021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248293	2542367	3361327	278831	280403	SPAC1783.03	SPBC21.01	fta2	mis17	sma2	SPBC776.19	Co-localization	physical	Kerres A (2006)	16855021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248294	2542311	2542367	278777	278831	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC1783.03	dad1	fta2	-	sma2	Co-localization	physical	Kerres A (2006)	16855021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248295	2541117	2543351	277632	279773	SPBC646.13	SPAC8C9.03	sds23	cgs1	moc1|psp1	-	Co-localization	physical	Yakura M (2006)	16819157	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248296	2541117	2539207	277632	275777	SPBC646.13	SPCC285.09c	sds23	cgs2	moc1|psp1	pde1	Co-localization	physical	Yakura M (2006)	16819157	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248297	2541117	2540810	277632	277329	SPBC646.13	SPBC19C7.03	sds23	cyr1	moc1|psp1	git2	Co-localization	physical	Yakura M (2006)	16819157	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248298	2542746	2539149	279196	275721	SPAC9G1.09	SPCC1739.11c	sid1	cdc11	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Krapp A (2006)	16787941	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248299	2540660	2539149	277185	275721	SPBC21.06c	SPCC1739.11c	cdc7	cdc11	its10|pld1	-	Co-localization	physical	Krapp A (2006)	16787941	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248300	2539487	2542756	276050	279206	SPCC895.05	SPAC15A10.16	for3	bud6	-	SPAC15E1.01|aip3|fat1	Co-localization	physical	Martin SG (2006)	16782006	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248301	2540992	2542463	277508	278924	SPBC342.05	SPAC1834.03c	crb2	hhf1	rhp9	h4.1	Co-localization	physical	Du LL (2006)	16778077	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248302	2540992	2541200	277508	277714	SPBC342.05	SPBC8D2.03c	crb2	hhf2	rhp9	ams3|h4.2	Co-localization	physical	Du LL (2006)	16778077	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248303	2540992	2543281	277508	279708	SPBC342.05	SPAC23C4.18c	crb2	rad4	rhp9	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Co-localization	physical	Du LL (2006)	16778077	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248304	2543281	2540992	279708	277508	SPAC23C4.18c	SPBC342.05	rad4	crb2	cut5|dpb11|dre3	rhp9	Two-hybrid	physical	Du LL (2006)	16778077	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248305	2539149	2543554	275721	279971	SPCC1739.11c	SPAC4H3.11c	cdc11	ppc89	-	mug127	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Rosenberg JA (2006)	16775007	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248306	2543554	2539149	279971	275721	SPAC4H3.11c	SPCC1739.11c	ppc89	cdc11	mug127	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Rosenberg JA (2006)	16775007	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248307	2539149	2543554	275721	279971	SPCC1739.11c	SPAC4H3.11c	cdc11	ppc89	-	mug127	Co-localization	physical	Rosenberg JA (2006)	16775007	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248308	2543554	2540650	279971	277175	SPAC4H3.11c	SPBC244.01c	ppc89	sid4	mug127	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Rosenberg JA (2006)	16775007	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248309	2540650	2543554	277175	279971	SPBC244.01c	SPAC4H3.11c	sid4	ppc89	-	mug127	Two-hybrid	physical	Rosenberg JA (2006)	16775007	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248310	2543554	2540650	279971	277175	SPAC4H3.11c	SPBC244.01c	ppc89	sid4	mug127	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Rosenberg JA (2006)	16775007	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248311	2543554	2540650	279971	277175	SPAC4H3.11c	SPBC244.01c	ppc89	sid4	mug127	-	FRET	physical	Rosenberg JA (2006)	16775007	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248312	2540650	2540650	277175	277175	SPBC244.01c	SPBC244.01c	sid4	sid4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Rosenberg JA (2006)	16775007	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248313	2543554	2543554	279971	279971	SPAC4H3.11c	SPAC4H3.11c	ppc89	ppc89	mug127	mug127	Two-hybrid	physical	Rosenberg JA (2006)	16775007	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248314	2540650	2543554	277175	279971	SPBC244.01c	SPAC4H3.11c	sid4	ppc89	-	mug127	Co-localization	physical	Rosenberg JA (2006)	16775007	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248315	2540690	2543554	277215	279971	SPBC428.20c	SPAC4H3.11c	alp6	ppc89	SPBC902.01c	mug127	Co-localization	physical	Rosenberg JA (2006)	16775007	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248316	2541455	2543554	277958	279971	SPAC6G9.06c	SPAC4H3.11c	pcp1	ppc89	-	mug127	Co-localization	physical	Rosenberg JA (2006)	16775007	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248317	2540176	2542632	276709	279086	SPBC1709.01	SPAC24H6.05	chs2	cdc25	SPBC1734.17	sal2	Co-localization	physical	Martin-Garcia R (2006)	16772338	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248318	2540176	2538846	276709	275427	SPBC1709.01	SPCC1919.10c	chs2	myo52	SPBC1734.17	-	Co-localization	physical	Martin-Garcia R (2006)	16772338	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248319	2540176	2540127	276709	276664	SPBC1709.01	SPBC106.20	chs2	exo70	SPBC1734.17	SPBC582.02	Co-localization	physical	Martin-Garcia R (2006)	16772338	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248320	2540176	2541699	276709	278195	SPBC1709.01	SPAP8A3.08	chs2	cdc4	SPBC1734.17	-	Co-localization	physical	Martin-Garcia R (2006)	16772338	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248321	2540176	2543545	276709	279962	SPBC1709.01	SPAC926.03	chs2	rlc1	SPBC1734.17	-	Co-localization	physical	Martin-Garcia R (2006)	16772338	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248322	2540176	2539149	276709	275721	SPBC1709.01	SPCC1739.11c	chs2	cdc11	SPBC1734.17	-	Co-localization	physical	Martin-Garcia R (2006)	16772338	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248323	2540176	2540624	276709	277150	SPBC1709.01	SPBC24C6.07	chs2	cdc14	SPBC1734.17	-	Co-localization	physical	Martin-Garcia R (2006)	16772338	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248324	2540176	2542162	276709	278638	SPBC1709.01	SPAC6F6.08c	chs2	cdc16	SPBC1734.17	bub2	Co-localization	physical	Martin-Garcia R (2006)	16772338	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248325	2543576	2540176	279991	276709	SPAC4A8.05c	SPBC1709.01	myp2	chs2	myo3	SPBC1734.17	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Martin-Garcia R (2006)	16772338	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248326	2540176	2543576	276709	279991	SPBC1709.01	SPAC4A8.05c	chs2	myp2	SPBC1734.17	myo3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Martin-Garcia R (2006)	16772338	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248327	2543576	2540176	279991	276709	SPAC4A8.05c	SPBC1709.01	myp2	chs2	myo3	SPBC1734.17	Co-localization	physical	Martin-Garcia R (2006)	16772338	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248328	2539481	2541633	276044	278129	SPCC622.16c	SPAC664.01c	epe1	swi6	kdm2	SPAC824.10c	Co-localization	physical	Zofall M (2006)	16762840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248329	2539481	2540825	276044	277343	SPCC622.16c	SPBC428.08c	epe1	clr4	kdm2	-	Co-localization	physical	Zofall M (2006)	16762840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248330	2539481	2541633	276044	278129	SPCC622.16c	SPAC664.01c	epe1	swi6	kdm2	SPAC824.10c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zofall M (2006)	16762840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248331	2541633	2539481	278129	276044	SPAC664.01c	SPCC622.16c	swi6	epe1	SPAC824.10c	kdm2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Zofall M (2006)	16762840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248333	2542337	2542285	278803	278753	SPAC16E8.09	SPAC17H9.09c	scd1	ras1	ral1	ste5	Two-hybrid	physical	Onken B (2006)	16754851	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248335	2542539	2539403	278996	275968	SPAC1B1.01	SPCC736.11	deb1	ago1	rdp1	csp9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Carmichael JB (2006)	16734665	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248336	2539403	2542539	275968	278996	SPCC736.11	SPAC1B1.01	ago1	deb1	csp9	rdp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Carmichael JB (2006)	16734665	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248337	2543289	2543281	279714	279708	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC23C4.18c	rad26	rad4	-	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Taricani L (2006)	16723501	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248338	2543281	2540719	279708	277242	SPAC23C4.18c	SPBC216.05	rad4	rad3	cut5|dpb11|dre3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Taricani L (2006)	16723501	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248339	2543281	2541746	279708	278240	SPAC23C4.18c	SPAC20G4.04c	rad4	hus1	cut5|dpb11|dre3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Taricani L (2006)	16723501	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248340	2543281	2541643	279708	278139	SPAC23C4.18c	SPAC14C4.13	rad4	rad17	cut5|dpb11|dre3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Taricani L (2006)	16723501	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248341	2543544	2543281	279961	279708	SPAC664.07c	SPAC23C4.18c	rad9	rad4	-	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2006)	16723501	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248342	2543544	2543281	279961	279708	SPAC664.07c	SPAC23C4.18c	rad9	rad4	-	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Taricani L (2006)	16723501	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248343	2543281	2541347	279708	277858	SPAC23C4.18c	SPBP8B7.14c	rad4	dpb2	cut5|dpb11|dre3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Taricani L (2006)	16723501	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248344	2541347	2543281	277858	279708	SPBP8B7.14c	SPAC23C4.18c	dpb2	rad4	-	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Taricani L (2006)	16723501	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248345	2543281	2542844	279708	279290	SPAC23C4.18c	SPAC13G7.08c	rad4	crb3	cut5|dpb11|dre3	ipi3	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2006)	16723501	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248346	2542844	2543281	279290	279708	SPAC13G7.08c	SPAC23C4.18c	crb3	rad4	ipi3	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2006)	16723501	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248347	2543281	2539087	279708	275659	SPAC23C4.18c	SPCC1259.13	rad4	chk1	cut5|dpb11|dre3	rad27	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2006)	16723501	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248348	2542844	2539087	279290	275659	SPAC13G7.08c	SPCC1259.13	crb3	chk1	ipi3	rad27	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2006)	16723501	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248349	2542844	2538959	279290	275533	SPAC13G7.08c	SPCC18B5.11c	crb3	cds1	ipi3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2006)	16723501	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248350	2543577	2539966	279992	276510	SPAC4H3.05	SPBC11B10.06	srs2	sws1	-	pi005|SPACTOKYO_453.32	Two-hybrid	physical	Martin V (2006)	16710300	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248351	2539770	2539966	276321	276510	SPBC1685.11	SPBC11B10.06	rlp1	sws1	-	pi005|SPACTOKYO_453.32	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Martin V (2006)	16710300	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248352	2539770	2542295	276321	278763	SPBC1685.11	SPAC17H9.03c	rlp1	rdl1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Martin V (2006)	16710300	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248353	2539966	2542295	276510	278763	SPBC11B10.06	SPAC17H9.03c	sws1	rdl1	pi005|SPACTOKYO_453.32	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Martin V (2006)	16710300	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248354	2539658	2539523	276213	276085	SPBC1105.17	SPCC622.09	cnp1	htb1	sim2	-	Co-localization	physical	Maruyama T (2006)	16688222	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248355	2539658	2542304	276213	278771	SPBC1105.17	SPAC1687.20c	cnp1	mis6	sim2	-	Co-localization	physical	Maruyama T (2006)	16688222	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248356	2542657	2542301	279111	278768	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC1687.18c	mis4	ssl3	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Bernard P (2006)	16682348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248357	2542301	2542657	278768	279111	SPAC1687.18c	SPAC31A2.05c	ssl3	mis4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bernard P (2006)	16682348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248358	2542657	2542301	279111	278768	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC1687.18c	mis4	ssl3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bernard P (2006)	16682348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248359	2542657	2539447	279111	276010	SPAC31A2.05c	SPCC338.17c	mis4	rad21	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bernard P (2006)	16682348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248360	2539447	2542301	276010	278768	SPCC338.17c	SPAC1687.18c	rad21	ssl3	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Bernard P (2006)	16682348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248362	3361400	2540712	280476	277235	SPAC1093.06c	SPBC216.02	dhc1	mcp5	SPAC30C2.01c	mug21|num1	Co-localization	physical	Yamashita A (2006)	16624923	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248363	2539861	2543395	276408	279817	SPBC16C6.06	SPAC4G9.13c	vps10	vps26	pep1	pep8	Co-localization	physical	Iwaki T (2006)	16622069	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248364	2539861	2542802	276408	279250	SPBC16C6.06	SPAC15E1.06	vps10	vps29	pep1	-	Co-localization	physical	Iwaki T (2006)	16622069	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248366	2538959	2543240	275533	279668	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC694.06c	cds1	mrc1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Xu YJ (2006)	16618806	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248367	2538959	2538959	275533	275533	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC18B5.11c	cds1	cds1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Xu YJ (2006)	16618806	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248368	2541973	2543273	278458	279701	SPAC6G9.13c	SPAC1002.06c	bqt1	bqt2	mug23|rec26	mug18|rec23	Two-hybrid	physical	Chikashige Y (2006)	16615890	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248369	2543273	2541973	279701	278458	SPAC1002.06c	SPAC6G9.13c	bqt2	bqt1	mug18|rec23	mug23|rec26	Two-hybrid	physical	Chikashige Y (2006)	16615890	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248370	2541973	2543273	278458	279701	SPAC6G9.13c	SPAC1002.06c	bqt1	bqt2	mug23|rec26	mug18|rec23	Co-localization	physical	Chikashige Y (2006)	16615890	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248371	2543273	2541973	279701	278458	SPAC1002.06c	SPAC6G9.13c	bqt2	bqt1	mug18|rec23	mug23|rec26	Co-localization	physical	Chikashige Y (2006)	16615890	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248372	2541973	2539914	278458	276458	SPAC6G9.13c	SPBC12D12.01	bqt1	sad1	mug23|rec26	SPBC16H5.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Chikashige Y (2006)	16615890	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248373	2543273	2540115	279701	276652	SPAC1002.06c	SPBC1778.02	bqt2	rap1	mug18|rec23	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chikashige Y (2006)	16615890	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248374	2543273	2541973	279701	278458	SPAC1002.06c	SPAC6G9.13c	bqt2	bqt1	mug18|rec23	mug23|rec26	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chikashige Y (2006)	16615890	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248375	2541326	2539379	277838	275945	SPBP35G2.03c	SPCC188.02	sgo1	par1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Kitajima TS (2006)	16541025	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248376	2541326	2539379	277838	275945	SPBP35G2.03c	SPCC188.02	sgo1	par1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kitajima TS (2006)	16541025	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248377	2540458	2539379	276986	275945	SPBC29A10.14	SPCC188.02	rec8	par1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Kitajima TS (2006)	16541025	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248378	2540458	2541326	276986	277838	SPBC29A10.14	SPBP35G2.03c	rec8	sgo1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Kitajima TS (2006)	16541025	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248379	2541326	2543042	277838	279477	SPBP35G2.03c	SPAP8A3.09c	sgo1	paa1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Riedel CG (2006)	16541024	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248380	2541326	2539379	277838	275945	SPBP35G2.03c	SPCC188.02	sgo1	par1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Riedel CG (2006)	16541024	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248381	2539379	2541326	275945	277838	SPCC188.02	SPBP35G2.03c	par1	sgo1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Riedel CG (2006)	16541024	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248382	2541326	2540072	277838	276610	SPBP35G2.03c	SPBC16H5.07c	sgo1	ppa2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Riedel CG (2006)	16541024	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248383	2541326	2542052	277838	278531	SPBP35G2.03c	SPAC823.15	sgo1	ppa1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Riedel CG (2006)	16541024	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248384	2539379	2543042	275945	279477	SPCC188.02	SPAP8A3.09c	par1	paa1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Riedel CG (2006)	16541024	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248385	2539379	2540072	275945	276610	SPCC188.02	SPBC16H5.07c	par1	ppa2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Riedel CG (2006)	16541024	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248386	2539379	2542052	275945	278531	SPCC188.02	SPAC823.15	par1	ppa1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Riedel CG (2006)	16541024	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248387	2539379	2541326	275945	277838	SPCC188.02	SPBP35G2.03c	par1	sgo1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Riedel CG (2006)	16541024	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248388	2540825	2542467	277343	278928	SPBC428.08c	SPAC1834.04	clr4	hht1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Nishijima H (2006)	16540522	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Methylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248389	2542467	2541863	278928	278353	SPAC1834.04	SPAC22E12.07	hht1	rna1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Nishijima H (2006)	16540522	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248390	2541220	2541863	277734	278353	SPBC8D2.04	SPAC22E12.07	hht2	rna1	h3.2	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Nishijima H (2006)	16540522	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248391	2542467	2541863	278928	278353	SPAC1834.04	SPAC22E12.07	hht1	rna1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Nishijima H (2006)	16540522	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	No Modification	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248392	2542467	2540825	278928	277343	SPAC1834.04	SPBC428.08c	hht1	clr4	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Nishijima H (2006)	16540522	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248393	3361487	2541863	280563	278353	SPAC1805.17	SPAC22E12.07	crm1	rna1	SPAC1B2.01|caf2	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Nishijima H (2006)	16540522	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248394	2539499	2541863	276062	278353	SPCC622.08c	SPAC22E12.07	hta1	rna1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Nishijima H (2006)	16540522	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248395	2542226	2541863	278699	278353	SPAC19G12.06c	SPAC22E12.07	hta2	rna1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Nishijima H (2006)	16540522	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248396	2539523	2541863	276085	278353	SPCC622.09	SPAC22E12.07	htb1	rna1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Nishijima H (2006)	16540522	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248397	2542463	2541863	278924	278353	SPAC1834.03c	SPAC22E12.07	hhf1	rna1	h4.1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Nishijima H (2006)	16540522	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248398	2541200	2541863	277714	278353	SPBC8D2.03c	SPAC22E12.07	hhf2	rna1	ams3|h4.2	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Nishijima H (2006)	16540522	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248399	2543580	2541688	279995	278184	SPAC644.14c	SPAC25G10.04c	rad51	rec10	rhp51	rec20	Co-localization	physical	Lorenz A (2006)	16532353	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248400	2543580	2539330	279995	275896	SPAC644.14c	SPCC1753.03c	rad51	rec7	rhp51	-	Co-localization	physical	Lorenz A (2006)	16532353	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248401	2543580	2542150	279995	278626	SPAC644.14c	SPAC17A5.11	rad51	rec12	rhp51	spo11	Co-localization	physical	Lorenz A (2006)	16532353	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248402	2540810	2540617	277329	277143	SPBC19C7.03	SPBC21C3.20c	cyr1	git1	git2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kao RS (2006)	16489217	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248403	2540617	2540810	277143	277329	SPBC21C3.20c	SPBC19C7.03	git1	cyr1	-	git2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kao RS (2006)	16489217	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248404	2539641	2539442	276196	276005	SPBC14C8.01c	SPCC5E4.04	cut2	cut1	SPBC1815.02c	ptr4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nagao K (2006)	16483313	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248405	2542869	3361384	279314	280460	SPAC140.02	SPAC12G12.13c	gar2	cid14	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Win TZ (2006)	16478992	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248406	2541587	2540911	278084	277427	SPAC14C4.02c	SPBC651.10	smc5	nse5	spr18	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	High Throughput|Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248407	2541587	2541512	278084	278013	SPAC14C4.02c	SPAC11E3.08c	smc5	nse6	spr18	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	High Throughput|Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248408	2541587	2539020	278084	275593	SPAC14C4.02c	SPCC5E4.06	smc5	smc6	spr18	rad18	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	High Throughput|Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248409	2541587	2539550	278084	276111	SPAC14C4.02c	SPCC550.05	smc5	nse1	spr18	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	High Throughput|Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248410	2541587	2542312	278084	278778	SPAC14C4.02c	SPAC16A10.06c	smc5	nse2	spr18	pli2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	High Throughput|Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248411	2541587	2539436	278084	275999	SPAC14C4.02c	SPCC645.04	smc5	nse3	spr18	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	High Throughput|Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248412	2541587	3361330	278084	280406	SPAC14C4.02c	SPBC20F10.04c	smc5	nse4	spr18	rad62	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248413	3361330	2541587	280406	278084	SPBC20F10.04c	SPAC14C4.02c	nse4	smc5	rad62	spr18	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248414	3361330	2539020	280406	275593	SPBC20F10.04c	SPCC5E4.06	nse4	smc6	rad62	rad18	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248415	3361330	2539550	280406	276111	SPBC20F10.04c	SPCC550.05	nse4	nse1	rad62	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248416	3361330	2542312	280406	278778	SPBC20F10.04c	SPAC16A10.06c	nse4	nse2	rad62	pli2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248417	3361330	2539436	280406	275999	SPBC20F10.04c	SPCC645.04	nse4	nse3	rad62	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248418	3361330	2540911	280406	277427	SPBC20F10.04c	SPBC651.10	nse4	nse5	rad62	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248419	3361330	2541512	280406	278013	SPBC20F10.04c	SPAC11E3.08c	nse4	nse6	rad62	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248420	2541512	2539550	278013	276111	SPAC11E3.08c	SPCC550.05	nse6	nse1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248421	2541512	2542312	278013	278778	SPAC11E3.08c	SPAC16A10.06c	nse6	nse2	-	pli2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248422	2541512	2539020	278013	275593	SPAC11E3.08c	SPCC5E4.06	nse6	smc6	-	rad18	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248423	2540911	2539550	277427	276111	SPBC651.10	SPCC550.05	nse5	nse1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248424	2540911	2541512	277427	278013	SPBC651.10	SPAC11E3.08c	nse5	nse6	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248425	2541587	2539020	278084	275593	SPAC14C4.02c	SPCC5E4.06	smc5	smc6	spr18	rad18	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248426	2541587	2541512	278084	278013	SPAC14C4.02c	SPAC11E3.08c	smc5	nse6	spr18	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248427	2541587	2540911	278084	277427	SPAC14C4.02c	SPBC651.10	smc5	nse5	spr18	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248428	2541587	3361330	278084	280406	SPAC14C4.02c	SPBC20F10.04c	smc5	nse4	spr18	rad62	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248429	2541587	2539436	278084	275999	SPAC14C4.02c	SPCC645.04	smc5	nse3	spr18	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248430	2541587	2542312	278084	278778	SPAC14C4.02c	SPAC16A10.06c	smc5	nse2	spr18	pli2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248431	2541587	2539550	278084	276111	SPAC14C4.02c	SPCC550.05	smc5	nse1	spr18	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248432	2540911	2541512	277427	278013	SPBC651.10	SPAC11E3.08c	nse5	nse6	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248433	2539020	2540911	275593	277427	SPCC5E4.06	SPBC651.10	smc6	nse5	rad18	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248434	2539020	2541512	275593	278013	SPCC5E4.06	SPAC11E3.08c	smc6	nse6	rad18	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248435	2542761	2540660	279211	277185	SPAC1565.06c	SPBC21.06c	spg1	cdc7	sid3	its10|pld1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mehta S (2006)	16469735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248436	2540660	2542761	277185	279211	SPBC21.06c	SPAC1565.06c	cdc7	spg1	its10|pld1	sid3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mehta S (2006)	16469735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248437	2542761	2540660	279211	277185	SPAC1565.06c	SPBC21.06c	spg1	cdc7	sid3	its10|pld1	Two-hybrid	physical	Mehta S (2006)	16469735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248438	2542761	2540660	279211	277185	SPAC1565.06c	SPBC21.06c	spg1	cdc7	sid3	its10|pld1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Mehta S (2006)	16469735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248439	2540660	2542761	277185	279211	SPBC21.06c	SPAC1565.06c	cdc7	spg1	its10|pld1	sid3	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Mehta S (2006)	16469735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248440	2540660	2540660	277185	277185	SPBC21.06c	SPBC21.06c	cdc7	cdc7	its10|pld1	its10|pld1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mehta S (2006)	16469735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248441	2540660	2540660	277185	277185	SPBC21.06c	SPBC21.06c	cdc7	cdc7	its10|pld1	its10|pld1	Two-hybrid	physical	Mehta S (2006)	16469735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248442	2538959	2540802	275533	277321	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC1921.02	cds1	rad60	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Raffa GD (2006)	16880212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248443	2538959	2538959	275533	275533	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC18B5.11c	cds1	cds1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Xu YJ (2006)	16618806	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248444	2538848	2539420	275429	275985	SPCC613.12c	SPCC970.07c	raf1	raf2	clr8|cmc1|dos1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Co-localization	physical	Li F (2005)	16040243	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248445	2543044	2542123	279479	278599	SPAC3C7.12	SPAC18G6.15	tip1	mal3	noc1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Busch KE (2004)	15177031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248446	2543044	2542123	279479	278599	SPAC3C7.12	SPAC18G6.15	tip1	mal3	noc1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Busch KE (2004)	15062095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248447	2542123	2543044	278599	279479	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC3C7.12	mal3	tip1	-	noc1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Busch KE (2004)	15177031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248448	2543044	2542123	279479	278599	SPAC3C7.12	SPAC18G6.15	tip1	mal3	noc1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Busch KE (2004)	15177031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248449	2542123	2543044	278599	279479	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC3C7.12	mal3	tip1	-	noc1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Busch KE (2004)	15062095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248450	2543044	2542123	279479	278599	SPAC3C7.12	SPAC18G6.15	tip1	mal3	noc1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Busch KE (2004)	15062095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248453	2539511	2538758	276073	275341	SPCC663.01c	SPCC1739.12	ekc1	ppe1	SPCC777.16c|eck1	esp1|ppx1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Goshima G (2003)	12773390	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248454	2538758	2539511	275341	276073	SPCC1739.12	SPCC663.01c	ppe1	ekc1	esp1|ppx1	SPCC777.16c|eck1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Goshima G (2003)	12773390	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248455	2543086	2543086	279519	279519	SPAC30D11.10	SPAC30D11.10	rad52	rad52	rad22|rad22A	rad22|rad22A	Two-hybrid	physical	van den Bosch M (2002)	11884628	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248456	2543086	2543086	279519	279519	SPAC30D11.10	SPAC30D11.10	rad52	rad52	rad22|rad22A	rad22|rad22A	Reconstituted Complex	physical	van den Bosch M (2002)	11884628	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248457	3361306	2539209	280382	275779	SPBC6B1.09c	SPCC23B6.03c	nbs1	tel1	slr10	-	Two-hybrid	physical	You Z (2005)	15964794	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248458	2541652	2539572	278148	276132	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC576.03c	sty1	tpx1	phh1|spc1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Veal EA (2004)	15225554	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248459	2543645	2540763	280059	277283	SPAC607.09c	SPBC405.04c	btn1	ypt7	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Gachet Y (2005)	16291725	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248460	2540664	2542137	277189	278613	SPBC215.02	SPAC1D4.13	bob1	byr1	gim5	ste1|ste3	Two-hybrid	physical	Henkel J (2001)	11683500	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248461	2542137	2540664	278613	277189	SPAC1D4.13	SPBC215.02	byr1	bob1	ste1|ste3	gim5	Two-hybrid	physical	Henkel J (2001)	11683500	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248462	2538848	2539050	275429	275623	SPCC613.12c	SPCC11E10.08	raf1	rik1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Li F (2005)	16040243	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248463	2541620	2539881	278117	276427	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC16G5.12c	rqh1	top3	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ahmad F (2005)	15702347	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248464	2542029	2540258	278511	276789	SPAC8E11.02c	SPBC32C12.02	rad24	ste11	anr5|sam4	aff1|stex	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kitamura K (2001)	11702950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248466	2542252	2542029	278722	278511	SPAC17A2.13c	SPAC8E11.02c	rad25	rad24	-	anr5|sam4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ozoe F (2002)	12242289	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248467	2539547	2542558	276108	279014	SPCC553.07c	SPAC1952.07	kpa1	rad1	mug40|pol(kappa)|pol-kappa	rad19	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kai M (2003)	12514100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	On MMS treatment, Rad1-HA was readily detectable in anti-DinB-myc immunoprecipitates	-	BIOGRID
248468	2539547	2541746	276108	278240	SPCC553.07c	SPAC20G4.04c	kpa1	hus1	mug40|pol(kappa)|pol-kappa	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kai M (2003)	12514100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Hus1-myc was readily detected in the anti-DinB-HA-immunoprecipitates from DNA-damaged cells and from replication perturbed cells, but not in undamaged or unperturbed cells	-	BIOGRID
248469	2542756	2539047	279206	275620	SPAC15A10.16	SPCC1223.06	bud6	tea1	SPAC15E1.01|aip3|fat1	alp8	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Glynn JM (2001)	11516644	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248470	2542195	2540436	278670	276964	SPAC1834.07	SPBC28F2.10c	klp3	ngg1	krp1	ada3|kap1	Two-hybrid	physical	Jeong JW (2002)	12132578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248471	2542195	2540436	278670	276964	SPAC1834.07	SPBC28F2.10c	klp3	ngg1	krp1	ada3|kap1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jeong JW (2002)	12132578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248472	2542696	2541695	279149	278191	SPAC29B12.03	SPAC1F7.05	spd1	cdc22	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Hakansson P (2006)	16317005	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248473	2541695	2542696	278191	279149	SPAC1F7.05	SPAC29B12.03	cdc22	spd1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Hakansson P (2006)	16317005	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248474	2543010	2540557	279448	277084	SPAC10F6.09c	SPBC29A10.04	psm3	psm1	smc3	smc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tomonaga T (2000)	11069892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248475	2542137	2540664	278613	277189	SPAC1D4.13	SPBC215.02	byr1	bob1	ste1|ste3	gim5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Henkel J (2001)	11683500	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248476	2542313	2540115	278779	276652	SPAC16A10.07c	SPBC1778.02	taz1	rap1	myb|myb1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Park MJ (2002)	12018857	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248477	2542313	2542313	278779	278779	SPAC16A10.07c	SPAC16A10.07c	taz1	taz1	myb|myb1	myb|myb1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Spink KG (2000)	10606652	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248478	2542313	2542144	278779	278620	SPAC16A10.07c	SPAC6F6.17	taz1	rif1	myb|myb1	SPAPJ736.01|tap1|tap11	Co-localization	physical	Kanoh J (2001)	11676925	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248479	2542313	2540115	278779	276652	SPAC16A10.07c	SPBC1778.02	taz1	rap1	myb|myb1	-	Co-localization	physical	Kanoh J (2001)	11676925	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248480	2540555	2540471	277082	276999	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC19F8.07	mcs2	mcs6	-	cdk7|crk1|mop1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Damagnez V (1995)	8557036	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248485	2539847	2539818	276395	276368	SPBC530.14c	SPBC11C11.08	dsk1	srp1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Tang Z (2002)	12186627	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248486	2539847	2539818	276395	276368	SPBC530.14c	SPBC11C11.08	dsk1	srp1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Tang Z (2000)	10629038	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248487	2540381	2542696	276910	279149	SPBC25D12.04	SPAC29B12.03	suc22	spd1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Liu C (2003)	12695334	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248488	2543446	2540051	279866	276589	SPAC4F8.10c	SPBC32H8.12c	stg1	act1	-	cps8|pi012	Co-localization	physical	Nakano K (2005)	16256112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248489	2539869	2541193	276415	277707	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC776.02c	cdc2	dis2	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	bws1|sds1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Yamano H (1994)	7957097	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248490	2541264	2540392	277778	276920	SPBC902.06	SPBC365.15	mto2	alp4	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Janson ME (2005)	15837798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248491	2542531	2542256	278989	278726	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC29A4.08c	cwf2	prp19	prp3|cwc2	cwf8	Two-hybrid	physical	Ohi MD (2002)	12088152	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248492	2540100	2543589	276638	280004	SPBC13E7.09	SPAC4F10.15c	vrp1	wsp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Carnahan RH (2003)	12939254	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248493	2540100	2543589	276638	280004	SPBC13E7.09	SPAC4F10.15c	vrp1	wsp1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Carnahan RH (2003)	12939254	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248494	2542266	2539838	278735	276387	SPAC17D4.02	SPBC1347.10	cdc45	cdc23	goa1|sna41	mcm10	Co-localization	physical	Gregan J (2003)	12972571	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248495	2542772	2539847	279221	276395	SPAC16.02c	SPBC530.14c	srp2	dsk1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Tang Z (2002)	12186627	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	No Modification	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248496	2539847	2542772	276395	279221	SPBC530.14c	SPAC16.02c	dsk1	srp2	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Tang Z (2002)	12186627	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	No Modification	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248497	2542772	2539847	279221	276395	SPAC16.02c	SPBC530.14c	srp2	dsk1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Tang Z (2000)	10629038	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	No Modification	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248498	2539847	2542772	276395	279221	SPBC530.14c	SPAC16.02c	dsk1	srp2	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Tang Z (2000)	10629038	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248499	2540735	2539403	277258	275968	SPBC83.03c	SPCC736.11	tas3	ago1	-	csp9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Verdel A (2004)	14704433	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248500	2539442	2539641	276005	276196	SPCC5E4.04	SPBC14C8.01c	cut1	cut2	ptr4	SPBC1815.02c	Two-hybrid	physical	Kumada K (1998)	9635190	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248501	2539442	2539641	276005	276196	SPCC5E4.04	SPBC14C8.01c	cut1	cut2	ptr4	SPBC1815.02c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kumada K (1998)	9635190	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248503	2543310	2539869	279734	276415	SPAC6B12.11	SPBC11B10.09	drc1	cdc2	sld2	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Noguchi E (2002)	11937031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248504	2539869	2541117	276415	277632	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC646.13	cdc2	sds23	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	moc1|psp1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Jang YJ (1997)	9242669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248505	2543041	2541815	279476	278306	SPAC3C7.11c	SPAC22A12.15c	cnx1	bip1	cal1	bip	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jannatipour M (1998)	9860839	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248506	2539047	2539642	275620	276197	SPCC1223.06	SPBC1706.01	tea1	tea4	alp8	wsh3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Martin SG (2005)	15809031	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248507	2539642	2539047	276197	275620	SPBC1706.01	SPCC1223.06	tea4	tea1	wsh3	alp8	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Martin SG (2005)	15809031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248508	2539047	2539642	275620	276197	SPCC1223.06	SPBC1706.01	tea1	tea4	alp8	wsh3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Martin SG (2005)	15809031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248509	2539642	2539047	276197	275620	SPBC1706.01	SPCC1223.06	tea4	tea1	wsh3	alp8	Two-hybrid	physical	Martin SG (2005)	15809031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248510	2539047	2539642	275620	276197	SPCC1223.06	SPBC1706.01	tea1	tea4	alp8	wsh3	Two-hybrid	physical	Martin SG (2005)	15809031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248511	2539047	2539642	275620	276197	SPCC1223.06	SPBC1706.01	tea1	tea4	alp8	wsh3	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Martin SG (2005)	15809031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248512	2541613	2541612	278110	278109	SPAC1F7.03	SPAC1F7.04	pkd2	rho1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Palmer CP (2005)	15537393	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248513	2539209	3361306	275779	280382	SPCC23B6.03c	SPBC6B1.09c	tel1	nbs1	-	slr10	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	You Z (2005)	15964794	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248514	2541682	2539829	278178	276378	SPAC15F9.02	SPBC17G9.04c	seh1	nup85	-	ptr5	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bai SW (2004)	15226438	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248515	2541849	2540020	278340	276564	SPAC20G8.01	SPBC16D10.09	cdc17	pcn1	SPAC57A10.13c	pcn	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Martin IV (2004)	14752051	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248516	3361306	2542757	280382	279207	SPBC6B1.09c	SPAC13C5.07	nbs1	mre11	slr10	rad32	Two-hybrid	physical	You Z (2005)	15964794	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248517	2542029	2542358	278511	278823	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC1782.09c	rad24	clp1	anr5|sam4	flp1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Mishra M (2005)	16085489	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248518	2542358	2542029	278823	278511	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC8E11.02c	clp1	rad24	flp1	anr5|sam4	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Mishra M (2005)	16085489	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248519	2539997	2538757	276541	275340	SPBC1604.14c	SPCC16C4.08c	shk1	skb15	orb2|pak1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kim HW (2001)	11389855	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248520	2542140	2541652	278616	278148	SPAC1783.07c	SPAC24B11.06c	pap1	sty1	caf3	phh1|spc1	Co-localization	physical	Toone WM (1998)	9585505	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248521	2539869	2542696	276415	279149	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC29B12.03	cdc2	spd1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Woollard A (1996)	8887552	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248522	2540735	2539403	277258	275968	SPBC83.03c	SPCC736.11	tas3	ago1	-	csp9	Two-hybrid	physical	Verdel A (2004)	14704433	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248523	2541887	2541699	278377	278195	SPAC22E12.16c	SPAP8A3.08	pik1	cdc4	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Desautels M (2001)	11087749	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248524	2543233	2540002	279661	276546	SPAC630.03	SPBC14C8.06	arp3	arc1	act2	sop2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Balasubramanian MK (1996)	8978670	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248525	2540002	2543233	276546	279661	SPBC14C8.06	SPAC630.03	arc1	arp3	sop2	act2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Balasubramanian MK (1996)	8978670	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248526	2541871	2543481	278361	279901	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAPB2B4.03	res2	cig2	mcs1|pct1	cyc17	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ayte J (2001)	11781565	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248527	2543298	2541755	279723	278249	SPAC6B12.15	SPAC2F7.11	cpc2	nrd1	rkp1	msa2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jeong HT (2004)	15277777	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248528	2540873	2540121	277390	276658	SPBC4C3.05c	SPBC119.14	nuc1	rti1	rpa1|rpa190	rad22B	Two-hybrid	physical	Tsutsui Y (2001)	11560889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248529	2543281	2543310	279708	279734	SPAC23C4.18c	SPAC6B12.11	rad4	drc1	cut5|dpb11|dre3	sld2	Two-hybrid	physical	Noguchi E (2002)	11937031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248530	2540019	2539434	276563	275997	SPBC1685.01	SPCC757.09c	pmp1	rnc1	dsp1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sugiura R (2003)	12931193	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248531	2542200	2541652	278675	278148	SPAC19D5.01	SPAC24B11.06c	pyp2	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Degols G (1996)	8649397	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248532	2540013	2543514	276557	279932	SPBC14C8.07c	SPAC4D7.03	cdc18	pop2	-	sud1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wolf DA (1999)	10209119	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248533	2539857	2542123	276404	278599	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC18G6.15	tea2	mal3	klp4	-	Co-localization	physical	Browning H (2003)	12894167	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248534	2540589	2540320	277115	276850	SPBC20F10.06	SPBC3D6.04c	mad2	mad1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ikui AE (2002)	11950879	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248535	2541587	2539550	278084	276111	SPAC14C4.02c	SPCC550.05	smc5	nse1	spr18	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald WH (2003)	12966087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248536	2541587	2539550	278084	276111	SPAC14C4.02c	SPCC550.05	smc5	nse1	spr18	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	McDonald WH (2003)	12966087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248537	2542099	3361403	278575	280479	SPAC24H6.12c	SPAC27D7.12c	uba3	but1	-	SPAC27D7.12|mug107|prx	Two-hybrid	physical	Yashiroda H (2003)	14623327	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248538	2540960	3361403	277476	280479	SPBC3D6.02	SPAC27D7.12c	but2	but1	-	SPAC27D7.12|mug107|prx	Two-hybrid	physical	Yashiroda H (2003)	14623327	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248539	2541587	2539020	278084	275593	SPAC14C4.02c	SPCC5E4.06	smc5	smc6	spr18	rad18	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Fousteri MI (2000)	10747036	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248540	2543627	2541910	280041	278400	SPAC458.07	SPAC23C4.15	tfa1	rpb5	SPAPYUG7.01	-	Far Western	physical	Hayashi K (2005)	15743411	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248541	2539479	2542148	276042	278624	SPCC584.04	SPAC1834.01	sup35	sup45	erf3	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ito K (1998)	9701287	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248542	2539479	2542148	276042	278624	SPCC584.04	SPAC1834.01	sup35	sup45	erf3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Ito K (1998)	9701287	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248543	2541729	2541582	278223	278079	SPAC22H12.02	SPAC29E6.08	tfg3	tbp1	taf14	SPAC30.12|tbp|tdf1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kimura M (2004)	15616156	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248544	2541729	2542339	278223	278805	SPAC22H12.02	SPAC16E8.16	tfg3	sua7	taf14	SPAC16E8.16	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kimura M (2004)	15616156	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248545	2539455	2541714	276018	278209	SPCC736.09c	SPAC30.03c	SPCC736.09c	tsn1	-	mug90|tsn	Two-hybrid	physical	Laufman O (2005)	16043634	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248546	2539783	2539645	276333	276200	SPBC1289.02c	SPBC146.07	uap2	prp2	-	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	McKinney R (1997)	9371883	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248547	2539783	2542482	276333	278942	SPBC1289.02c	SPAP8A3.06	uap2	uaf2	-	SPAP8A3.06|ods2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	McKinney R (1997)	9371883	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248548	2540719	2538959	277242	275533	SPBC216.05	SPCC18B5.11c	rad3	cds1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Tanaka K (2001)	11313465	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248549	2540148	2539627	276685	276184	SPBC16D10.04c	SPBC1734.02c	dna2	cdc27	-	SPBC337.18c	Two-hybrid	physical	Kang HY (2000)	10880469	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248550	2540148	2541849	276685	278340	SPBC16D10.04c	SPAC20G8.01	dna2	cdc17	-	SPAC57A10.13c	Two-hybrid	physical	Kang HY (2000)	10880469	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248552	2542029	2539087	278511	275659	SPAC8E11.02c	SPCC1259.13	rad24	chk1	anr5|sam4	rad27	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Capasso H (2002)	12415000	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248553	2540802	2541587	277321	278084	SPBC1921.02	SPAC14C4.02c	rad60	smc5	-	spr18	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Boddy MN (2003)	12897162	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248554	2540624	2542746	277150	279196	SPBC24C6.07	SPAC9G1.09	cdc14	sid1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Guertin DA (2000)	10775265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248555	2542746	2540624	279196	277150	SPAC9G1.09	SPBC24C6.07	sid1	cdc14	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Guertin DA (2000)	10775265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248556	2542313	2540115	278779	276652	SPAC16A10.07c	SPBC1778.02	taz1	rap1	myb|myb1	-	Co-localization	physical	Chikashige Y (2001)	11676924	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248557	2540115	2542313	276652	278779	SPBC1778.02	SPAC16A10.07c	rap1	taz1	-	myb|myb1	Co-localization	physical	Chikashige Y (2001)	11676924	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248558	2539219	2538736	275789	275320	SPCC1795.01c	SPCC1322.12c	mad3	bub1	SPCC895.02	-	Co-localization	physical	Millband DN (2002)	11909965	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248559	2543537	2540939	279954	277455	SPAC4D7.05	SPBC4.07c	sum1	rpt2	tif34	mts2	Co-localization	physical	Dunand-Sauthier I (2002)	12006658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248560	2539016	2543526	275589	279944	SPCC970.04c	SPAC4A8.15c	mob2	cdc3	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Hou MC (2003)	12456722	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248561	2539016	2541940	275589	278427	SPCC970.04c	SPAC27F1.02c	mob2	cdc8	-	fus4	Co-localization	physical	Hou MC (2003)	12456722	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248562	2539016	2540660	275589	277185	SPCC970.04c	SPBC21.06c	mob2	cdc7	-	its10|pld1	Co-localization	physical	Hou MC (2003)	12456722	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248563	2539016	2541599	275589	278096	SPCC970.04c	SPAC24B11.11c	mob2	sid2	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Hou MC (2003)	12456722	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248564	2543441	2539016	279861	275589	SPAC821.12	SPCC970.04c	orb6	mob2	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Hou MC (2003)	12456722	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248565	2539016	2543441	275589	279861	SPCC970.04c	SPAC821.12	mob2	orb6	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Hou MC (2003)	12456722	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248566	2543382	2539497	279804	276060	SPAC890.02c	SPCC895.07	alp7	alp14	mia1	mtc1	Co-localization	physical	Sato M (2004)	14742702	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248567	2539497	2543382	276060	279804	SPCC895.07	SPAC890.02c	alp14	alp7	mtc1	mia1	Co-localization	physical	Sato M (2004)	14742702	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248568	2540845	2541599	277362	278096	SPBC428.13c	SPAC24B11.11c	mob1	sid2	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Hou MC (2004)	15060149	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248569	2543044	2542123	279479	278599	SPAC3C7.12	SPAC18G6.15	tip1	mal3	noc1	-	Co-localization	physical	Busch KE (2004)	15062095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248570	2542239	2540047	278711	276585	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC16C6.10	chp1	chp2	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Sadaie M (2004)	15372076	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248571	2538736	2541856	275320	278347	SPCC1322.12c	SPAC23H3.08c	bub1	bub3	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2004)	15509783	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248572	2541856	2538736	278347	275320	SPAC23H3.08c	SPCC1322.12c	bub3	bub1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2004)	15509783	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248573	3361400	2542069	280476	278546	SPAC1093.06c	SPAC27D7.13c	dhc1	ssm4	SPAC30C2.01c	SPAC637.01c	Co-localization	physical	Niccoli T (2004)	15509865	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248574	2542069	3361400	278546	280476	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC1093.06c	ssm4	dhc1	SPAC637.01c	SPAC30C2.01c	Co-localization	physical	Niccoli T (2004)	15509865	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248575	2540633	2539963	277159	276507	SPBC21D10.12	SPBC17F3.02	hob1	nak1	-	mor4|orb3	Co-localization	physical	Huang TY (2005)	15615784	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248576	2543589	2539963	280004	276507	SPAC4F10.15c	SPBC17F3.02	wsp1	nak1	-	mor4|orb3	Co-localization	physical	Huang TY (2005)	15615784	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248577	2541264	2539467	277778	276030	SPBC902.06	SPCC417.07c	mto2	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Co-localization	physical	Samejima I (2005)	15659644	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248578	2539467	2541264	276030	277778	SPCC417.07c	SPBC902.06	mto1	mto2	mbo1|mod20	-	Co-localization	physical	Samejima I (2005)	15659644	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248579	2540100	2539659	276638	276214	SPBC13E7.09	SPBC146.13c	vrp1	myo1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Sirotkin V (2005)	16087707	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248580	2540100	2543589	276638	280004	SPBC13E7.09	SPAC4F10.15c	vrp1	wsp1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Sirotkin V (2005)	16087707	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248581	2540051	2538951	276589	275525	SPBC32H8.12c	SPCC297.03	act1	ssp1	cps8|pi012	-	Co-localization	physical	Matsusaka T (1995)	7628434	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248582	2540149	2541059	276686	277574	SPBC1289.03c	SPBC557.03c	spi1	pim1	-	dcd1|ptr2	Co-localization	physical	Matynia A (1996)	8887664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248583	2541652	3361487	278148	280563	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC1805.17	sty1	crm1	phh1|spc1	SPAC1B2.01|caf2	Co-localization	physical	Gaits F (1999)	10233152	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248584	2542761	2540650	279211	277175	SPAC1565.06c	SPBC244.01c	spg1	sid4	sid3	-	Co-localization	physical	Chang L (2000)	10805785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248585	2540660	2540650	277185	277175	SPBC21.06c	SPBC244.01c	cdc7	sid4	its10|pld1	-	Co-localization	physical	Chang L (2000)	10805785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248586	2541936	2540650	278423	277175	SPAC222.10c	SPBC244.01c	byr4	sid4	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Chang L (2000)	10805785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248587	2539658	2542304	276213	278771	SPBC1105.17	SPAC1687.20c	cnp1	mis6	sim2	-	Co-localization	physical	Takahashi K (2000)	10864871	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248588	2541633	2540825	278129	277343	SPAC664.01c	SPBC428.08c	swi6	clr4	SPAC824.10c	-	Co-localization	physical	Nakayama  J (2001)	11283354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	ChIP	-	BIOGRID
248589	2540660	2539149	277185	275721	SPBC21.06c	SPCC1739.11c	cdc7	cdc11	its10|pld1	-	Co-localization	physical	Krapp A (2001)	11676915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248590	2542746	2539149	279196	275721	SPAC9G1.09	SPCC1739.11c	sid1	cdc11	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Krapp A (2001)	11676915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248591	2542761	2539149	279211	275721	SPAC1565.06c	SPCC1739.11c	spg1	cdc11	sid3	-	Co-localization	physical	Krapp A (2001)	11676915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248592	2540845	2539149	277362	275721	SPBC428.13c	SPCC1739.11c	mob1	cdc11	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Krapp A (2001)	11676915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248593	2541936	2539149	278423	275721	SPAC222.10c	SPCC1739.11c	byr4	cdc11	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Krapp A (2001)	11676915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248594	2539149	2540650	275721	277175	SPCC1739.11c	SPBC244.01c	cdc11	sid4	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Krapp A (2001)	11676915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248595	2540650	2539149	277175	275721	SPBC244.01c	SPCC1739.11c	sid4	cdc11	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Krapp A (2001)	11676915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248596	2539765	2542679	276316	279132	SPBC1778.06c	SPAC12B10.07	fim1	acp1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Nakano K (2001)	11694585	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248597	2539219	2541856	275789	278347	SPCC1795.01c	SPAC23H3.08c	mad3	bub3	SPCC895.02	-	Co-localization	physical	Millband DN (2002)	11909965	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248599	2540804	2542304	277323	278771	SPBC18E5.03c	SPAC1687.20c	sim4	mis6	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248600	2541326	2538736	277838	275320	SPBP35G2.03c	SPCC1322.12c	sgo1	bub1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Kitajima TS (2004)	14730319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248601	2543044	2539857	279479	276404	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC1604.20c	tip1	tea2	noc1	klp4	Co-localization	physical	Busch KE (2004)	15177031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248603	2542239	2540825	278711	277343	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC428.08c	chp1	clr4	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Sadaie M (2004)	15372076	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248604	2540047	2540825	276585	277343	SPBC16C6.10	SPBC428.08c	chp2	clr4	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Sadaie M (2004)	15372076	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248605	2539360	2539513	275926	276075	SPCC613.04c	SPCC645.05c	rng3	myo2	-	rng5	Co-localization	physical	Lord M (2004)	15504913	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248606	3361400	2543044	280476	279479	SPAC1093.06c	SPAC3C7.12	dhc1	tip1	SPAC30C2.01c	noc1	Co-localization	physical	Niccoli T (2004)	15509865	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248607	2539219	2538736	275789	275320	SPCC1795.01c	SPCC1322.12c	mad3	bub1	SPCC895.02	-	Co-localization	physical	Kadura S (2005)	15525673	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248608	2538736	2539219	275320	275789	SPCC1322.12c	SPCC1795.01c	bub1	mad3	-	SPCC895.02	Co-localization	physical	Kadura S (2005)	15525673	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248609	2541856	2538736	278347	275320	SPAC23H3.08c	SPCC1322.12c	bub3	bub1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Kadura S (2005)	15525673	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248610	2538736	2541856	275320	278347	SPCC1322.12c	SPAC23H3.08c	bub1	bub3	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Kadura S (2005)	15525673	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248611	2541633	3361342	278129	280418	SPAC664.01c	SPBC16D10.07c	swi6	sir2	SPAC824.10c	-	Co-localization	physical	Freeman-Cook LL (2005)	15545655	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248612	2542198	2541633	278673	278129	SPAC6F12.09	SPAC664.01c	rdp1	swi6	rdr1	SPAC824.10c	Co-localization	physical	Sugiyama T (2005)	15615848	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248613	2541889	2539642	278379	276197	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC1706.01	pom1	tea4	-	wsh3	Co-localization	physical	Tatebe H (2005)	15936270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248614	2542140	2539426	278616	275991	SPAC1783.07c	SPCC962.03c	pap1	cut15	caf3	-	Co-localization	physical	Umeda M (2005)	15937127	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248615	2542140	2539928	278616	276472	SPAC1783.07c	SPBC1604.08c	pap1	imp1	caf3	-	Co-localization	physical	Umeda M (2005)	15937127	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248616	2541633	2538848	278129	275429	SPAC664.01c	SPCC613.12c	swi6	raf1	SPAC824.10c	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Co-localization	physical	Li F (2005)	16040243	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248617	2541633	2539420	278129	275985	SPAC664.01c	SPCC970.07c	swi6	raf2	SPAC824.10c	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Co-localization	physical	Li F (2005)	16040243	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248618	2542358	2542029	278823	278511	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC8E11.02c	clp1	rad24	flp1	anr5|sam4	Co-localization	physical	Mishra M (2005)	16085489	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248619	2541317	2539963	277829	276507	SPBP19A11.04c	SPBC17F3.02	mor2	nak1	cps12	mor4|orb3	Co-localization	physical	Kanai M (2005)	16096637	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248620	2541317	2542388	277829	278852	SPBP19A11.04c	SPAC1834.06c	mor2	pmo25	cps12	-	Co-localization	physical	Kanai M (2005)	16096637	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248621	2540825	2543116	277343	279548	SPBC428.08c	SPAC3A11.08	clr4	pcu4	-	Cul-4|cul4	Co-localization	physical	Jia S (2005)	16127433	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248622	2539016	2542388	275589	278852	SPCC970.04c	SPAC1834.06c	mob2	pmo25	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Mendoza M (2005)	16325501	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248623	2540219	2540128	276752	276665	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC15D4.03	hip1	slm9	hir1	-	Co-localization	physical	Greenall A (2006)	16428807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248624	2542200	2541652	278675	278148	SPAC19D5.01	SPAC24B11.06c	pyp2	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Degols G (1996)	8649397	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248625	2539869	2541117	276415	277632	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC646.13	cdc2	sds23	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	moc1|psp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Jang YJ (1997)	9242669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248626	2543685	2542007	280099	278490	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC20H4.07	rad55	rad57	rhp55	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Tsutsui Y (2001)	11560889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248627	2542007	2543685	278490	280099	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC3C7.03c	rad57	rad55	rhp57|SPAC145.01	rhp55	Two-hybrid	physical	Tsutsui Y (2001)	11560889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248628	2542007	2543685	278490	280099	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC3C7.03c	rad57	rad55	rhp57|SPAC145.01	rhp55	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tsutsui Y (2001)	11560889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248629	2543685	2542007	280099	278490	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC20H4.07	rad55	rad57	rhp55	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tsutsui Y (2001)	11560889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248630	2543086	2543580	279519	279995	SPAC30D11.10	SPAC644.14c	rad52	rad51	rad22|rad22A	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Tsutsui Y (2001)	11560889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248631	2543580	2543086	279995	279519	SPAC644.14c	SPAC30D11.10	rad51	rad52	rhp51	rad22|rad22A	Two-hybrid	physical	Tsutsui Y (2001)	11560889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248632	2543086	2543685	279519	280099	SPAC30D11.10	SPAC3C7.03c	rad52	rad55	rad22|rad22A	rhp55	Two-hybrid	physical	Tsutsui Y (2001)	11560889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248633	2543685	2543086	280099	279519	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC30D11.10	rad55	rad52	rhp55	rad22|rad22A	Two-hybrid	physical	Tsutsui Y (2001)	11560889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248634	2543580	2543685	279995	280099	SPAC644.14c	SPAC3C7.03c	rad51	rad55	rhp51	rhp55	Two-hybrid	physical	Tsutsui Y (2001)	11560889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248635	2543685	2543580	280099	279995	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC644.14c	rad55	rad51	rhp55	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Tsutsui Y (2001)	11560889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248636	2542749	2543580	279199	279995	SPAC15A10.03c	SPAC644.14c	rad54	rad51	rhp54	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Tsutsui Y (2001)	11560889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248637	2542007	2543580	278490	279995	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC644.14c	rad57	rad51	rhp57|SPAC145.01	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Tsutsui Y (2001)	11560889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248638	2543580	2542007	279995	278490	SPAC644.14c	SPAC20H4.07	rad51	rad57	rhp51	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Tsutsui Y (2001)	11560889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248639	2540121	2543580	276658	279995	SPBC119.14	SPAC644.14c	rti1	rad51	rad22B	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Tsutsui Y (2001)	11560889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248640	2543580	2540121	279995	276658	SPAC644.14c	SPBC119.14	rad51	rti1	rhp51	rad22B	Two-hybrid	physical	Tsutsui Y (2001)	11560889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248641	2540121	2543086	276658	279519	SPBC119.14	SPAC30D11.10	rti1	rad52	rad22B	rad22|rad22A	Two-hybrid	physical	Tsutsui Y (2001)	11560889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248642	2543086	2540121	279519	276658	SPAC30D11.10	SPBC119.14	rad52	rti1	rad22|rad22A	rad22B	Two-hybrid	physical	Tsutsui Y (2001)	11560889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248643	2540121	2540121	276658	276658	SPBC119.14	SPBC119.14	rti1	rti1	rad22B	rad22B	Two-hybrid	physical	Tsutsui Y (2001)	11560889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248644	2543580	2541158	279995	277673	SPAC644.14c	SPBC660.13c	rad51	ssb1	rhp51	rad11|rpa1	Two-hybrid	physical	Tsutsui Y (2001)	11560889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248645	2541158	2543086	277673	279519	SPBC660.13c	SPAC30D11.10	ssb1	rad52	rad11|rpa1	rad22|rad22A	Two-hybrid	physical	Tsutsui Y (2001)	11560889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248646	2541158	2540121	277673	276658	SPBC660.13c	SPBC119.14	ssb1	rti1	rad11|rpa1	rad22B	Two-hybrid	physical	Tsutsui Y (2001)	11560889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248647	2543086	2543086	279519	279519	SPAC30D11.10	SPAC30D11.10	rad52	rad52	rad22|rad22A	rad22|rad22A	Two-hybrid	physical	Tsutsui Y (2001)	11560889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248648	2540099	2543441	276637	279861	SPBC16H5.11c	SPAC821.12	skb1	orb6	rmt5	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Wiley DJ (2003)	12646585	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248649	2543441	2540099	279861	276637	SPAC821.12	SPBC16H5.11c	orb6	skb1	-	rmt5	Two-hybrid	physical	Wiley DJ (2003)	12646585	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248650	2540099	2543441	276637	279861	SPBC16H5.11c	SPAC821.12	skb1	orb6	rmt5	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wiley DJ (2003)	12646585	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248651	2542299	2543671	278766	280085	SPAC18B11.10	SPAC644.04	tup11	pct1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Mukai Y (2003)	12637515	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248652	2543671	2542299	280085	278766	SPAC644.04	SPAC18B11.10	pct1	tup11	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Mukai Y (2003)	12637515	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248653	2543671	2543402	280085	279824	SPAC644.04	SPAC630.14c	pct1	tup12	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Mukai Y (2003)	12637515	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248654	2541957	2542880	278444	279325	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC6F12.14	plo1	cut23	-	apc8	Two-hybrid	physical	Reynolds N (2003)	12615979	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248656	2541957	2540829	278444	277347	SPAC23C11.16	SPBC800.09	plo1	sum2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Reynolds N (2003)	12615979	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248657	2541957	2542492	278444	278951	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC1B9.02c	plo1	sck1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Reynolds N (2003)	12615979	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248658	2541957	2539827	278444	276376	SPAC23C11.16	SPBC1861.02	plo1	abp2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Reynolds N (2003)	12615979	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248659	2541957	2543254	278444	279682	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC1006.03c	plo1	red1	-	iss3	Two-hybrid	physical	Reynolds N (2003)	12615979	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248660	2541957	2542938	278444	279379	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC6B12.08	plo1	mug185	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Reynolds N (2003)	12615979	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248661	2541957	2542701	278444	279154	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC26H5.05	plo1	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Two-hybrid	physical	Reynolds N (2003)	12615979	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248662	2540481	2541268	277009	277782	SPBC2D10.12	SPBP19A11.03c	rhp23	mts4	-	rpn1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Seeger M (2003)	12615927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248663	2543682	2541268	280096	277782	SPAC637.10c	SPBP19A11.03c	rpn10	mts4	pus1	rpn1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Seeger M (2003)	12615927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248664	2543682	2540191	280096	276724	SPAC637.10c	SPBC17D11.07c	rpn10	rpn2	pus1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Seeger M (2003)	12615927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248665	2543682	2539639	280096	276194	SPAC637.10c	SPBC106.09	rpn10	cut4	pus1	apc1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Seeger M (2003)	12615927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248666	2543682	2541592	280096	278089	SPAC637.10c	SPAC6F12.15c	rpn10	cut9	pus1	dre1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seeger M (2003)	12615927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248667	2540481	2541592	277009	278089	SPBC2D10.12	SPAC6F12.15c	rhp23	cut9	-	dre1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seeger M (2003)	12615927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248669	2539838	2539164	276387	275735	SPBC1347.10	SPCC16A11.17	cdc23	mcm4	mcm10	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Lee JK (2003)	12604790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248671	2539838	2541165	276387	277680	SPBC1347.10	SPBC776.12c	cdc23	hsk1	mcm10	cdc7	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Lee JK (2003)	12604790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248672	2539838	2538838	276387	275419	SPBC1347.10	SPCC1682.02c	cdc23	mcm3	mcm10	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lee JK (2003)	12604790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248673	2539838	2540620	276387	277146	SPBC1347.10	SPBC4.04c	cdc23	mcm2	mcm10	cdc19|nda1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lee JK (2003)	12604790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248675	2539773	2540292	276324	276823	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC28F2.12	med7	rpb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Samuelsen CO (2003)	12738880	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248676	2539773	2542571	276324	279027	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC589.02c	med7	med13	-	spTrap240|srb9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Samuelsen CO (2003)	12738880	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248677	2542571	2539773	279027	276324	SPAC589.02c	SPBC14F5.08	med13	med7	spTrap240|srb9	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Samuelsen CO (2003)	12738880	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248678	2539773	2541900	276324	278390	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC23H4.17c	med7	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Samuelsen CO (2003)	12738880	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248679	2539773	2539651	276324	276206	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC12D12.06	med7	srb11	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Samuelsen CO (2003)	12738880	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248680	2539773	2541446	276324	277951	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC23G3.01	med7	rpb2	-	SPAC521.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Samuelsen CO (2003)	12738880	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248681	2539773	2543467	276324	279887	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC688.08	med7	srb8	-	med12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Samuelsen CO (2003)	12738880	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248682	2542571	2540294	279027	276825	SPAC589.02c	SPBC31F10.04c	med13	srb4	spTrap240|srb9	med17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Samuelsen CO (2003)	12738880	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248683	2542571	2541925	279027	278413	SPAC589.02c	SPAC5D6.05	med13	med18	spTrap240|srb9	sep11|pmc6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Samuelsen CO (2003)	12738880	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248684	2542571	2543467	279027	279887	SPAC589.02c	SPAC688.08	med13	srb8	spTrap240|srb9	med12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Samuelsen CO (2003)	12738880	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248685	2542571	2541900	279027	278390	SPAC589.02c	SPAC23H4.17c	med13	srb10	spTrap240|srb9	cdk8|prk1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Samuelsen CO (2003)	12738880	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248686	2542571	2540761	279027	277281	SPAC589.02c	SPBC21.04	med13	med8	spTrap240|srb9	sep15	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Samuelsen CO (2003)	12738880	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248687	2542571	2539651	279027	276206	SPAC589.02c	SPBC12D12.06	med13	srb11	spTrap240|srb9	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Samuelsen CO (2003)	12738880	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248688	2542896	2542896	279340	279340	SPAC3F10.04	SPAC3F10.04	gsa1	gsa1	gsh2	gsh2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Phlippen N (2003)	12734194	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248689	2539881	2541620	276427	278117	SPBC16G5.12c	SPAC2G11.12	top3	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Laursen LV (2003)	12724426	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248690	2541620	2539881	278117	276427	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC16G5.12c	rqh1	top3	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Laursen LV (2003)	12724426	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248696	2540234	2541153	276766	277668	SPBC336.12c	SPBC725.16	cdc10	res1	-	sct1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Whitehall S (1999)	10564266	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248697	2540234	2541871	276766	278361	SPBC336.12c	SPAC22F3.09c	cdc10	res2	-	mcs1|pct1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Whitehall S (1999)	10564266	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248698	2543289	2540719	279714	277242	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC216.05	rad26	rad3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Edwards RJ (1999)	10559981	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248699	2540470	2541159	276998	277674	SPBC29A10.15	SPBC685.09	orc1	orc2	cdc30|orp1|rid1	orp2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Moon KY (1999)	10535928	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248700	2540470	2541107	276998	277622	SPBC29A10.15	SPBC646.14c	orc1	orc5	cdc30|orp1|rid1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Moon KY (1999)	10535928	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248701	2541159	2543248	277674	279676	SPBC685.09	SPAC3H1.01c	orc2	orc3	orp2	SPAP14E8.06c|orp3	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Moon KY (1999)	10535928	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248702	2541159	2541298	277674	277810	SPBC685.09	SPBP23A10.13	orc2	orc4	orp2	orp4	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Moon KY (1999)	10535928	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248703	2541298	2541159	277810	277674	SPBP23A10.13	SPBC685.09	orc4	orc2	orp4	orp2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Moon KY (1999)	10535928	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248704	2541159	2540470	277674	276998	SPBC685.09	SPBC29A10.15	orc2	orc1	orp2	cdc30|orp1|rid1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Moon KY (1999)	10535928	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248705	2541159	2541107	277674	277622	SPBC685.09	SPBC646.14c	orc2	orc5	orp2	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Moon KY (1999)	10535928	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248706	2541107	2541159	277622	277674	SPBC646.14c	SPBC685.09	orc5	orc2	-	orp2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Moon KY (1999)	10535928	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248707	2541159	2540438	277674	276966	SPBC685.09	SPBC2A9.12	orc2	orc6	orp2	SPBC2D10.02	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Moon KY (1999)	10535928	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248708	2540438	2541159	276966	277674	SPBC2A9.12	SPBC685.09	orc6	orc2	SPBC2D10.02	orp2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Moon KY (1999)	10535928	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248709	2541298	2540470	277810	276998	SPBP23A10.13	SPBC29A10.15	orc4	orc1	orp4	cdc30|orp1|rid1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Moon KY (1999)	10535928	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248710	2541298	2543248	277810	279676	SPBP23A10.13	SPAC3H1.01c	orc4	orc3	orp4	SPAP14E8.06c|orp3	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Moon KY (1999)	10535928	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248711	2541298	2541107	277810	277622	SPBP23A10.13	SPBC646.14c	orc4	orc5	orp4	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Moon KY (1999)	10535928	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248712	2541107	2541298	277622	277810	SPBC646.14c	SPBP23A10.13	orc5	orc4	-	orp4	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Moon KY (1999)	10535928	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248713	2541298	2540438	277810	276966	SPBP23A10.13	SPBC2A9.12	orc4	orc6	orp4	SPBC2D10.02	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Moon KY (1999)	10535928	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248714	2540438	2541298	276966	277810	SPBC2A9.12	SPBP23A10.13	orc6	orc4	SPBC2D10.02	orp4	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Moon KY (1999)	10535928	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248715	2541107	2540470	277622	276998	SPBC646.14c	SPBC29A10.15	orc5	orc1	-	cdc30|orp1|rid1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Moon KY (1999)	10535928	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248716	2541107	2543248	277622	279676	SPBC646.14c	SPAC3H1.01c	orc5	orc3	-	SPAP14E8.06c|orp3	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Moon KY (1999)	10535928	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248717	2541107	2540438	277622	276966	SPBC646.14c	SPBC2A9.12	orc5	orc6	-	SPBC2D10.02	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Moon KY (1999)	10535928	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248718	2540438	2541107	276966	277622	SPBC2A9.12	SPBC646.14c	orc6	orc5	SPBC2D10.02	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Moon KY (1999)	10535928	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248719	2540438	2540470	276966	276998	SPBC2A9.12	SPBC29A10.15	orc6	orc1	SPBC2D10.02	cdc30|orp1|rid1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Moon KY (1999)	10535928	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248720	2540438	2543248	276966	279676	SPBC2A9.12	SPAC3H1.01c	orc6	orc3	SPBC2D10.02	SPAP14E8.06c|orp3	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Moon KY (1999)	10535928	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248721	2542615	2541592	279069	278089	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC6F12.15c	cut20	cut9	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	dre1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yamashita YM (1999)	10526233	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248722	2542615	2539639	279069	276194	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBC106.09	cut20	cut4	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	apc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yamashita YM (1999)	10526233	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248723	2542615	2542438	279069	278900	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC17C9.01c	cut20	nuc2	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	SPAC1851.01|apc3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yamashita YM (1999)	10526233	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248724	2542162	2541936	278638	278423	SPAC6F6.08c	SPAC222.10c	cdc16	byr4	bub2	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Furge KA (1999)	10196225	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248725	2539087	2542252	275659	278722	SPCC1259.13	SPAC17A2.13c	chk1	rad25	rad27	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Chen L (1999)	10090724	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248726	2539087	2542029	275659	278511	SPCC1259.13	SPAC8E11.02c	chk1	rad24	rad27	anr5|sam4	Two-hybrid	physical	Chen L (1999)	10090724	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248727	2539087	2542029	275659	278511	SPCC1259.13	SPAC8E11.02c	chk1	rad24	rad27	anr5|sam4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen L (1999)	10090724	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248728	2542029	2539087	278511	275659	SPAC8E11.02c	SPCC1259.13	rad24	chk1	anr5|sam4	rad27	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen L (1999)	10090724	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248729	2539087	2542252	275659	278722	SPCC1259.13	SPAC17A2.13c	chk1	rad25	rad27	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen L (1999)	10090724	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248730	2542252	2539087	278722	275659	SPAC17A2.13c	SPCC1259.13	rad25	chk1	-	rad27	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen L (1999)	10090724	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248731	2542029	2542632	278511	279086	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC24H6.05	rad24	cdc25	anr5|sam4	sal2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen L (1999)	10090724	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248732	2542252	2542632	278722	279086	SPAC17A2.13c	SPAC24H6.05	rad25	cdc25	-	sal2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen L (1999)	10090724	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248733	2541592	2542615	278089	279069	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC19G12.01c	cut9	cut20	dre1	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Berry LD (1999)	10082519	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248734	2542438	2542615	278900	279069	SPAC17C9.01c	SPAC19G12.01c	nuc2	cut20	SPAC1851.01|apc3	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Berry LD (1999)	10082519	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248735	2538838	2542477	275419	278937	SPCC1682.02c	SPAC1B2.05	mcm3	mcm5	-	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sherman DA (1998)	9705504	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248736	2542477	2538838	278937	275419	SPAC1B2.05	SPCC1682.02c	mcm5	mcm3	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sherman DA (1998)	9705504	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248738	2539479	2539371	276042	275937	SPCC584.04	SPCC18B5.06	sup35	dom34	erf3	SPCC18B5.06|erf1|sup45	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ito K (1998)	9701287	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248739	2539371	2539479	275937	276042	SPCC18B5.06	SPCC584.04	dom34	sup35	SPCC18B5.06|erf1|sup45	erf3	Two-hybrid	physical	Ito K (1998)	9701287	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248740	2543027	2541468	279463	277970	SPAC110.03	SPAC1F5.09c	cdc42	shk2	-	pak2	Two-hybrid	physical	Yang P (1998)	9660817	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248745	2542337	2541726	278803	278220	SPAC16E8.09	SPAC22H10.07	scd1	scd2	ral1	ral3	Two-hybrid	physical	Yang P (1998)	9660817	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248746	2540099	2541468	276637	277970	SPBC16H5.11c	SPAC1F5.09c	skb1	shk2	rmt5	pak2	Two-hybrid	physical	Yang P (1998)	9660817	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248747	2540099	2540099	276637	276637	SPBC16H5.11c	SPBC16H5.11c	skb1	skb1	rmt5	rmt5	Two-hybrid	physical	Yang P (1998)	9660817	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248748	2541726	2543027	278220	279463	SPAC22H10.07	SPAC110.03	scd2	cdc42	ral3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Yang P (1998)	9660817	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248749	2542137	2542474	278613	278934	SPAC1D4.13	SPAC31G5.09c	byr1	spk1	ste1|ste3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Yang P (1998)	9660817	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248750	2540620	2540784	277146	277303	SPBC4.04c	SPBC211.04c	mcm2	mcm6	cdc19|nda1	mis5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sherman DA (1998)	9658174	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248751	2540784	2540620	277303	277146	SPBC211.04c	SPBC4.04c	mcm6	mcm2	mis5	cdc19|nda1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sherman DA (1998)	9658174	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248752	2540620	2539164	277146	275735	SPBC4.04c	SPCC16A11.17	mcm2	mcm4	cdc19|nda1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sherman DA (1998)	9658174	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248753	2539164	2540620	275735	277146	SPCC16A11.17	SPBC4.04c	mcm4	mcm2	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	cdc19|nda1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sherman DA (1998)	9658174	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248754	2540784	2542477	277303	278937	SPBC211.04c	SPAC1B2.05	mcm6	mcm5	mis5	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sherman DA (1998)	9658174	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248755	2540784	2539164	277303	275735	SPBC211.04c	SPCC16A11.17	mcm6	mcm4	mis5	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sherman DA (1998)	9658174	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248756	2539164	2540784	275735	277303	SPCC16A11.17	SPBC211.04c	mcm4	mcm6	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	mis5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sherman DA (1998)	9658174	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248757	2543682	2540025	280096	276569	SPAC637.10c	SPBC16G5.01	rpn10	rpn12	pus1	SPBC342.07|mts3	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Wilkinson CR (2000)	10809753	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248758	2540650	2540650	277175	277175	SPBC244.01c	SPBC244.01c	sid4	sid4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chang L (2000)	10805785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248759	2540650	2540650	277175	277175	SPBC244.01c	SPBC244.01c	sid4	sid4	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chang L (2000)	10805785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248760	2540719	2539087	277242	275659	SPBC216.05	SPCC1259.13	rad3	chk1	-	rad27	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Martinho RG (1998)	9857181	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248761	2540719	2538959	277242	275533	SPBC216.05	SPCC18B5.11c	rad3	cds1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Martinho RG (1998)	9857181	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248762	2540580	2543298	277106	279723	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC6B12.15	ran1	cpc2	pat1	rkp1	Two-hybrid	physical	McLeod M (2000)	10805744	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248763	2543298	2540580	279723	277106	SPAC6B12.15	SPBC19C2.05	cpc2	ran1	rkp1	pat1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	McLeod M (2000)	10805744	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248764	2542761	2541936	279211	278423	SPAC1565.06c	SPAC222.10c	spg1	byr4	sid3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Li C (2000)	10799520	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248765	2542761	2542162	279211	278638	SPAC1565.06c	SPAC6F6.08c	spg1	cdc16	sid3	bub2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Li C (2000)	10799520	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248766	2540471	2540555	276999	277082	SPBC19F8.07	SPBP16F5.02	mcs6	mcs2	cdk7|crk1|mop1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hermand D (1998)	9857180	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248768	2540099	2539869	276637	276415	SPBC16H5.11c	SPBC11B10.09	skb1	cdc2	rmt5	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gilbreth M (1998)	9843966	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248769	2539997	2539869	276541	276415	SPBC1604.14c	SPBC11B10.09	shk1	cdc2	orb2|pak1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gilbreth M (1998)	9843966	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248770	2542080	2542029	278557	278511	SPAC27D7.03c	SPAC8E11.02c	mei2	rad24	-	anr5|sam4	Two-hybrid	physical	Tanaka Y (2000)	10788621	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248771	2540624	2542746	277150	279196	SPBC24C6.07	SPAC9G1.09	cdc14	sid1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Guertin DA (2000)	10775265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248772	2542746	2540624	279196	277150	SPAC9G1.09	SPBC24C6.07	sid1	cdc14	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Guertin DA (2000)	10775265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248773	2540624	2542746	277150	279196	SPBC24C6.07	SPAC9G1.09	cdc14	sid1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Guertin DA (2001)	11384993	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248774	2542746	2540624	279196	277150	SPAC9G1.09	SPBC24C6.07	sid1	cdc14	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Guertin DA (2001)	11384993	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248775	2539164	2540620	275735	277146	SPCC16A11.17	SPBC4.04c	mcm4	mcm2	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	cdc19|nda1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lee JK (2000)	10770926	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248776	2540620	2539164	277146	275735	SPBC4.04c	SPCC16A11.17	mcm2	mcm4	cdc19|nda1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lee JK (2000)	10770926	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248777	2539164	2540784	275735	277303	SPCC16A11.17	SPBC211.04c	mcm4	mcm6	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	mis5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lee JK (2000)	10770926	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248778	2539164	2540630	275735	277156	SPCC16A11.17	SPBC25D12.03c	mcm4	mcm7	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lee JK (2000)	10770926	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248779	2539164	2538838	275735	275419	SPCC16A11.17	SPCC1682.02c	mcm4	mcm3	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lee JK (2000)	10770926	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248780	2539164	2542477	275735	278937	SPCC16A11.17	SPAC1B2.05	mcm4	mcm5	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lee JK (2000)	10770926	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248781	2540620	2540784	277146	277303	SPBC4.04c	SPBC211.04c	mcm2	mcm6	cdc19|nda1	mis5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lee JK (2000)	10770926	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248782	2540620	2540630	277146	277156	SPBC4.04c	SPBC25D12.03c	mcm2	mcm7	cdc19|nda1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lee JK (2000)	10770926	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248783	2540620	2542477	277146	278937	SPBC4.04c	SPAC1B2.05	mcm2	mcm5	cdc19|nda1	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lee JK (2000)	10770926	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248784	2540620	2538838	277146	275419	SPBC4.04c	SPCC1682.02c	mcm2	mcm3	cdc19|nda1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lee JK (2000)	10770926	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248785	2541699	2539513	278195	276075	SPAP8A3.08	SPCC645.05c	cdc4	myo2	-	rng5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Motegi F (2000)	10769212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248786	2539513	2541699	276075	278195	SPCC645.05c	SPAP8A3.08	myo2	cdc4	rng5	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Motegi F (2000)	10769212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248787	2541699	2543576	278195	279991	SPAP8A3.08	SPAC4A8.05c	cdc4	myp2	-	myo3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Motegi F (2000)	10769212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248788	2543576	2541699	279991	278195	SPAC4A8.05c	SPAP8A3.08	myp2	cdc4	myo3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Motegi F (2000)	10769212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248789	2541699	2539513	278195	276075	SPAP8A3.08	SPCC645.05c	cdc4	myo2	-	rng5	Two-hybrid	physical	Motegi F (2000)	10769212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248790	2541699	2543576	278195	279991	SPAP8A3.08	SPAC4A8.05c	cdc4	myp2	-	myo3	Two-hybrid	physical	Motegi F (2000)	10769212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248791	2540845	2541599	277362	278096	SPBC428.13c	SPAC24B11.11c	mob1	sid2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Salimova E (2000)	10769201	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248792	2541599	2540845	278096	277362	SPAC24B11.11c	SPBC428.13c	sid2	mob1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Salimova E (2000)	10769201	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248793	2540845	2541599	277362	278096	SPBC428.13c	SPAC24B11.11c	mob1	sid2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Salimova E (2000)	10769201	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248794	2540847	2540013	277364	276557	SPBC428.18	SPBC14C8.07c	cdt1	cdc18	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nishitani H (2000)	10766248	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248795	2541209	2541178	277723	277692	SPBC887.10	SPBC725.02	mcs4	mpr1	-	spy1	Two-hybrid	physical	Aoyama K (2000)	10940030	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248796	2542482	2539645	278942	276200	SPAP8A3.06	SPBC146.07	uaf2	prp2	SPAP8A3.06|ods2	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Two-hybrid	physical	Beales M (2000)	10923022	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248797	2539783	2539645	276333	276200	SPBC1289.02c	SPBC146.07	uap2	prp2	-	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Two-hybrid	physical	Beales M (2000)	10923022	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248798	2538832	2539645	275413	276200	SPCC962.06c	SPBC146.07	bpb1	prp2	sf1|ods3	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Two-hybrid	physical	Beales M (2000)	10923022	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248799	2541619	2539645	278116	276200	SPAC27F1.09c	SPBC146.07	prp10	prp2	sap155|SF3b155	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Two-hybrid	physical	Beales M (2000)	10923022	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248800	2543514	2540013	279932	276557	SPAC4D7.03	SPBC14C8.07c	pop2	cdc18	sud1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jallepalli PV (1998)	9653157	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248801	2540013	2543514	276557	279932	SPBC14C8.07c	SPAC4D7.03	cdc18	pop2	-	sud1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jallepalli PV (1998)	9653157	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248802	2539083	2540292	275655	276823	SPCC1020.04c	SPBC28F2.12	rpb6	rpb1	rpo15	-	Far Western	physical	Ishiguro A (1998)	9642054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248803	2540292	2539083	276823	275655	SPBC28F2.12	SPCC1020.04c	rpb1	rpb6	-	rpo15	Far Western	physical	Ishiguro A (1998)	9642054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248804	2539083	2541446	275655	277951	SPCC1020.04c	SPAC23G3.01	rpb6	rpb2	rpo15	SPAC521.06	Far Western	physical	Ishiguro A (1998)	9642054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248805	2542097	2540292	278573	276823	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC28F2.12	rpb7	rpb1	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Far Western	physical	Ishiguro A (1998)	9642054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248806	2542097	2541446	278573	277951	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC23G3.01	rpb7	rpb2	SPAPYUK71.02	SPAC521.06	Far Western	physical	Ishiguro A (1998)	9642054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248807	2539794	2540292	276344	276823	SPBC14C8.12	SPBC28F2.12	rpb8	rpb1	-	-	Far Western	physical	Ishiguro A (1998)	9642054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248808	2540292	2539794	276823	276344	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC14C8.12	rpb1	rpb8	-	-	Far Western	physical	Ishiguro A (1998)	9642054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248809	2539794	2541446	276344	277951	SPBC14C8.12	SPAC23G3.01	rpb8	rpb2	-	SPAC521.06	Far Western	physical	Ishiguro A (1998)	9642054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248810	2542233	2540292	278705	276823	SPAC1B3.12c	SPBC28F2.12	rpb10	rpb1	-	-	Far Western	physical	Ishiguro A (1998)	9642054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248811	2542233	2541446	278705	277951	SPAC1B3.12c	SPAC23G3.01	rpb10	rpb2	-	SPAC521.06	Far Western	physical	Ishiguro A (1998)	9642054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248812	2543112	2540292	279544	276823	SPAC3A12.07	SPBC28F2.12	rpb11	rpb1	-	-	Far Western	physical	Ishiguro A (1998)	9642054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248813	2543112	2541446	279544	277951	SPAC3A12.07	SPAC23G3.01	rpb11	rpb2	-	SPAC521.06	Far Western	physical	Ishiguro A (1998)	9642054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248814	2541446	2543112	277951	279544	SPAC23G3.01	SPAC3A12.07	rpb2	rpb11	SPAC521.06	-	Far Western	physical	Ishiguro A (1998)	9642054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248815	2543112	2538816	279544	275397	SPAC3A12.07	SPCC1442.10c	rpb11	rpb3	-	-	Far Western	physical	Ishiguro A (1998)	9642054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248816	2538816	2543112	275397	279544	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC3A12.07	rpb3	rpb11	-	-	Far Western	physical	Ishiguro A (1998)	9642054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248817	2540793	2540292	277312	276823	SPBC19C2.03	SPBC28F2.12	rpc10	rpb1	rpb12	-	Far Western	physical	Ishiguro A (1998)	9642054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248818	2540793	2541446	277312	277951	SPBC19C2.03	SPAC23G3.01	rpc10	rpb2	rpb12	SPAC521.06	Far Western	physical	Ishiguro A (1998)	9642054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248819	2541446	2540793	277951	277312	SPAC23G3.01	SPBC19C2.03	rpb2	rpc10	SPAC521.06	rpb12	Far Western	physical	Ishiguro A (1998)	9642054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248820	2540292	2538816	276823	275397	SPBC28F2.12	SPCC1442.10c	rpb1	rpb3	-	-	Far Western	physical	Ishiguro A (1998)	9642054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248821	2540292	2541910	276823	278400	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC23C4.15	rpb1	rpb5	-	-	Far Western	physical	Ishiguro A (1998)	9642054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248822	2540292	2541446	276823	277951	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC23G3.01	rpb1	rpb2	-	SPAC521.06	Far Western	physical	Ishiguro A (1998)	9642054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248823	2541446	2540292	277951	276823	SPAC23G3.01	SPBC28F2.12	rpb2	rpb1	SPAC521.06	-	Far Western	physical	Ishiguro A (1998)	9642054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248824	2538816	2542233	275397	278705	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC1B3.12c	rpb3	rpb10	-	-	Far Western	physical	Ishiguro A (1998)	9642054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248825	2541910	2539083	278400	275655	SPAC23C4.15	SPCC1020.04c	rpb5	rpb6	-	rpo15	Far Western	physical	Ishiguro A (1998)	9642054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248826	2539083	2542097	275655	278573	SPCC1020.04c	SPACUNK4.06c	rpb6	rpb7	rpo15	SPAPYUK71.02	Far Western	physical	Ishiguro A (1998)	9642054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248827	2539083	2539794	275655	276344	SPCC1020.04c	SPBC14C8.12	rpb6	rpb8	rpo15	-	Far Western	physical	Ishiguro A (1998)	9642054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248828	2541936	2542761	278423	279211	SPAC222.10c	SPAC1565.06c	byr4	spg1	-	sid3	Two-hybrid	physical	Jwa M (1998)	9638658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248829	2541936	2542162	278423	278638	SPAC222.10c	SPAC6F6.08c	byr4	cdc16	-	bub2	Two-hybrid	physical	Jwa M (1998)	9638658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248830	2540880	2539869	277397	276415	SPBC582.03	SPBC11B10.09	cdc13	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Rhind N (1998)	9632761	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248831	2540341	2541871	276870	278361	SPBC2F12.11c	SPAC22F3.09c	rep2	res2	-	mcs1|pct1	Two-hybrid	physical	Tahara S (1998)	9614195	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248832	2540341	2541871	276870	278361	SPBC2F12.11c	SPAC22F3.09c	rep2	res2	-	mcs1|pct1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tahara S (1998)	9614195	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248833	2540341	2541153	276870	277668	SPBC2F12.11c	SPBC725.16	rep2	res1	-	sct1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tahara S (1998)	9614195	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248834	2540880	2539640	277397	276195	SPBC582.03	SPBC32F12.09	cdc13	rum1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Stern B (1998)	9614176	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248835	2539640	2540880	276195	277397	SPBC32F12.09	SPBC582.03	rum1	cdc13	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Stern B (1998)	9614176	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248836	2543481	2539640	279901	276195	SPAPB2B4.03	SPBC32F12.09	cig2	rum1	cyc17	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Stern B (1998)	9614176	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248837	2539640	2543481	276195	279901	SPBC32F12.09	SPAPB2B4.03	rum1	cig2	-	cyc17	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Stern B (1998)	9614176	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248838	2541957	2541141	278444	277656	SPAC23C11.16	SPBC649.05	plo1	cut12	-	stf1	Two-hybrid	physical	MacIver FH (2003)	12815070	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248839	2541141	2541141	277656	277656	SPBC649.05	SPBC649.05	cut12	cut12	stf1	stf1	Two-hybrid	physical	MacIver FH (2003)	12815070	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248840	2541957	2541141	278444	277656	SPAC23C11.16	SPBC649.05	plo1	cut12	-	stf1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	MacIver FH (2003)	12815070	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248841	2543682	2541268	280096	277782	SPAC637.10c	SPBP19A11.03c	rpn10	mts4	pus1	rpn1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yen HC (2003)	12783882	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248842	2543682	2543040	280096	279475	SPAC637.10c	SPAC31G5.13	rpn10	rpn11	pus1	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yen HC (2003)	12783882	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248843	2543682	2540025	280096	276569	SPAC637.10c	SPBC16G5.01	rpn10	rpn12	pus1	SPBC342.07|mts3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yen HC (2003)	12783882	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248844	2543682	2540939	280096	277455	SPAC637.10c	SPBC4.07c	rpn10	rpt2	pus1	mts2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yen HC (2003)	12783882	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248845	2540368	2541624	276897	278120	SPBC36.05c	SPAC23C11.15	clr6	pst2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nakayama J (2003)	12773392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248846	2540368	2541858	276897	278348	SPBC36.05c	SPAC23H4.12	clr6	alp13	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nakayama J (2003)	12773392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248847	2541858	2540368	278348	276897	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC36.05c	alp13	clr6	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nakayama J (2003)	12773392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248848	2540368	2541804	276897	278295	SPBC36.05c	SPAC29A4.18	clr6	prw1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nakayama J (2003)	12773392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248849	2541804	2540368	278295	276897	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC36.05c	prw1	clr6	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nakayama J (2003)	12773392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248850	2541804	2541624	278295	278120	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC23C11.15	prw1	pst2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nakayama J (2003)	12773392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248851	2541804	2541858	278295	278348	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC23H4.12	prw1	alp13	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nakayama J (2003)	12773392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248852	2541858	2541804	278348	278295	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC29A4.18	alp13	prw1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nakayama J (2003)	12773392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248853	2541858	2541624	278348	278120	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC23C11.15	alp13	pst2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nakayama J (2003)	12773392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248854	2541963	2541963	278449	278449	SPAC21E11.04	SPAC21E11.04	aca1	aca1	ppr1	ppr1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Nomura M (2003)	12761200	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248855	2539997	2540099	276541	276637	SPBC1604.14c	SPBC16H5.11c	shk1	skb1	orb2|pak1	rmt5	Two-hybrid	physical	Gilbreth M (1996)	8943016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248856	2539997	2539997	276541	276541	SPBC1604.14c	SPBC1604.14c	shk1	shk1	orb2|pak1	orb2|pak1	Two-hybrid	physical	Gilbreth M (1996)	8943016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248857	2539997	2543027	276541	279463	SPBC1604.14c	SPAC110.03	shk1	cdc42	orb2|pak1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Gilbreth M (1996)	8943016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248858	2543027	2539997	279463	276541	SPAC110.03	SPBC1604.14c	cdc42	shk1	-	orb2|pak1	Two-hybrid	physical	Gilbreth M (1996)	8943016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248860	2541726	2543027	278220	279463	SPAC22H10.07	SPAC110.03	scd2	cdc42	ral3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Gilbreth M (1996)	8943016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248861	2539639	2542438	276194	278900	SPBC106.09	SPAC17C9.01c	cut4	nuc2	apc1	SPAC1851.01|apc3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yamashita YM (1996)	8918880	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248862	2539639	2541592	276194	278089	SPBC106.09	SPAC6F12.15c	cut4	cut9	apc1	dre1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yamashita YM (1996)	8918880	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248863	2543222	2540589	279650	277115	SPAC821.08c	SPBC20F10.06	slp1	mad2	cdc20	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ikui AE (2002)	11950879	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248864	2541699	2539513	278195	276075	SPAP8A3.08	SPCC645.05c	cdc4	myo2	-	rng5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	D'souza VM (2001)	11942609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248865	2540737	2539869	277260	276415	SPBC19G7.05c	SPBC11B10.09	bgs1	cdc2	cps1|drc1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Noguchi E (2002)	11937031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248866	2540737	2540880	277260	277397	SPBC19G7.05c	SPBC582.03	bgs1	cdc13	cps1|drc1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Noguchi E (2002)	11937031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248867	2540737	2543481	277260	279901	SPBC19G7.05c	SPAPB2B4.03	bgs1	cig2	cps1|drc1	cyc17	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Noguchi E (2002)	11937031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248868	2540737	2543281	277260	279708	SPBC19G7.05c	SPAC23C4.18c	bgs1	rad4	cps1|drc1	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Two-hybrid	physical	Noguchi E (2002)	11937031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248869	2539219	2543222	275789	279650	SPCC1795.01c	SPAC821.08c	mad3	slp1	SPCC895.02	cdc20	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Millband DN (2002)	11909965	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248870	2539219	2540589	275789	277115	SPCC1795.01c	SPBC20F10.06	mad3	mad2	SPCC895.02	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Millband DN (2002)	11909965	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248871	2539219	2541856	275789	278347	SPCC1795.01c	SPAC23H3.08c	mad3	bub3	SPCC895.02	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Millband DN (2002)	11909965	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248872	2541089	2543412	277604	279834	SPBC646.09c	SPAC637.07	int6	moe1	yin6	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yen HC (2000)	11121040	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248873	2541089	2543412	277604	279834	SPBC646.09c	SPAC637.07	int6	moe1	yin6	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248874	2541089	2543412	277604	279834	SPBC646.09c	SPAC637.07	int6	moe1	yin6	-	Far Western	physical	Yen HC (2000)	11121040	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248875	2542123	2543412	278599	279834	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC637.07	mal3	moe1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Chen CR (2000)	11102508	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248876	2543412	2542123	279834	278599	SPAC637.07	SPAC18G6.15	moe1	mal3	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chen CR (2000)	11102508	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248877	2541699	2539513	278195	276075	SPAP8A3.08	SPCC645.05c	cdc4	myo2	-	rng5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Desautels M (2001)	11087749	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248878	2540149	2540142	276686	276679	SPBC1289.03c	SPBC1773.07c	spi1	sbp1	-	yrb1	Two-hybrid	physical	Fleig U (2000)	11086011	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248879	2540392	2540223	276920	276756	SPBC365.15	SPBC32F12.04	alp4	gtb1	-	tug1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Vardy L (2000)	11080156	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248880	2540690	2540223	277215	276756	SPBC428.20c	SPBC32F12.04	alp6	gtb1	SPBC902.01c	tug1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Vardy L (2000)	11080156	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248881	2539004	2543670	275578	280084	SPCC4G3.05c	SPAPB1E7.06c	mus81	eme1	slx3	mms4|slx2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Boddy MN (2001)	11719193	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248882	2539004	2543670	275578	280084	SPCC4G3.05c	SPAPB1E7.06c	mus81	eme1	slx3	mms4|slx2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Boddy MN (2001)	11719193	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248883	2541298	2540470	277810	276998	SPBP23A10.13	SPBC29A10.15	orc4	orc1	orp4	cdc30|orp1|rid1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Lee JK (2001)	11717425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248884	2541298	2541159	277810	277674	SPBP23A10.13	SPBC685.09	orc4	orc2	orp4	orp2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Lee JK (2001)	11717425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248885	2541159	2541298	277674	277810	SPBC685.09	SPBP23A10.13	orc2	orc4	orp2	orp4	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Lee JK (2001)	11717425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248886	2541298	2543248	277810	279676	SPBP23A10.13	SPAC3H1.01c	orc4	orc3	orp4	SPAP14E8.06c|orp3	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Lee JK (2001)	11717425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248887	2541298	2541107	277810	277622	SPBP23A10.13	SPBC646.14c	orc4	orc5	orp4	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Lee JK (2001)	11717425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248888	2541298	2540438	277810	276966	SPBP23A10.13	SPBC2A9.12	orc4	orc6	orp4	SPBC2D10.02	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Lee JK (2001)	11717425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248889	2541159	2540470	277674	276998	SPBC685.09	SPBC29A10.15	orc2	orc1	orp2	cdc30|orp1|rid1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Lee JK (2001)	11717425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248890	2541159	2543248	277674	279676	SPBC685.09	SPAC3H1.01c	orc2	orc3	orp2	SPAP14E8.06c|orp3	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Lee JK (2001)	11717425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248891	2541159	2541107	277674	277622	SPBC685.09	SPBC646.14c	orc2	orc5	orp2	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Lee JK (2001)	11717425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248892	2541159	2540438	277674	276966	SPBC685.09	SPBC2A9.12	orc2	orc6	orp2	SPBC2D10.02	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Lee JK (2001)	11717425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248893	2538959	2543240	275533	279668	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC694.06c	cds1	mrc1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tanaka K (2001)	11715017	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248894	2538959	2543240	275533	279668	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC694.06c	cds1	mrc1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tanaka K (2004)	15173168	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248895	2539087	2538689	275659	275274	SPCC1259.13	SPCC1795.11	chk1	sum3	rad27	ded1|moc2|slh3	Two-hybrid	physical	Liu HY (2002)	11711540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248896	2539087	2538689	275659	275274	SPCC1259.13	SPCC1795.11	chk1	sum3	rad27	ded1|moc2|slh3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Liu HY (2002)	11711540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248897	2543537	2541089	279954	277604	SPAC4D7.05	SPBC646.09c	sum1	int6	tif34	yin6	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bandyopadhyay A (2002)	11705997	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248898	2541089	2543537	277604	279954	SPBC646.09c	SPAC4D7.05	int6	sum1	yin6	tif34	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bandyopadhyay A (2002)	11705997	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248899	2543537	2543412	279954	279834	SPAC4D7.05	SPAC637.07	sum1	moe1	tif34	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bandyopadhyay A (2002)	11705997	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248900	2541089	2543412	277604	279834	SPBC646.09c	SPAC637.07	int6	moe1	yin6	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bandyopadhyay A (2002)	11705997	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248901	2541298	2540470	277810	276998	SPBP23A10.13	SPBC29A10.15	orc4	orc1	orp4	cdc30|orp1|rid1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kong D (2001)	11689699	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248902	2541298	2540470	277810	276998	SPBP23A10.13	SPBC29A10.15	orc4	orc1	orp4	cdc30|orp1|rid1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kong D (2003)	12840006	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248903	2541298	2541159	277810	277674	SPBP23A10.13	SPBC685.09	orc4	orc2	orp4	orp2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kong D (2001)	11689699	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248904	2541298	2541159	277810	277674	SPBP23A10.13	SPBC685.09	orc4	orc2	orp4	orp2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kong D (2003)	12840006	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248905	2541298	2540438	277810	276966	SPBP23A10.13	SPBC2A9.12	orc4	orc6	orp4	SPBC2D10.02	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kong D (2001)	11689699	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248906	2540645	2539645	277170	276200	SPBC21B10.05c	SPBC146.07	pop3	prp2	wat1	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Two-hybrid	physical	Ochotorena IL (2001)	11686295	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248907	2539783	2539645	276333	276200	SPBC1289.02c	SPBC146.07	uap2	prp2	-	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Two-hybrid	physical	Ochotorena IL (2001)	11686295	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248908	2542482	2539645	278942	276200	SPAP8A3.06	SPBC146.07	uaf2	prp2	SPAP8A3.06|ods2	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Two-hybrid	physical	Ochotorena IL (2001)	11686295	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248909	2540645	2539645	277170	276200	SPBC21B10.05c	SPBC146.07	pop3	prp2	wat1	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ochotorena IL (2001)	11686295	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248910	2539645	2540645	276200	277170	SPBC146.07	SPBC21B10.05c	prp2	pop3	mis11|ods1|uaf1	wat1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ochotorena IL (2001)	11686295	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248911	2540470	2540470	276998	276998	SPBC29A10.15	SPBC29A10.15	orc1	orc1	cdc30|orp1|rid1	cdc30|orp1|rid1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Takahashi T (2001)	11683912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248912	2540470	2541159	276998	277674	SPBC29A10.15	SPBC685.09	orc1	orc2	cdc30|orp1|rid1	orp2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Takahashi T (2001)	11683912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248913	2541159	2540470	277674	276998	SPBC685.09	SPBC29A10.15	orc2	orc1	orp2	cdc30|orp1|rid1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Takahashi T (2001)	11683912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248914	2540470	2541298	276998	277810	SPBC29A10.15	SPBP23A10.13	orc1	orc4	cdc30|orp1|rid1	orp4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Takahashi T (2001)	11683912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248915	2540470	2541107	276998	277622	SPBC29A10.15	SPBC646.14c	orc1	orc5	cdc30|orp1|rid1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Takahashi T (2001)	11683912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248916	2541159	2541159	277674	277674	SPBC685.09	SPBC685.09	orc2	orc2	orp2	orp2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Takahashi T (2001)	11683912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248917	2541159	2541298	277674	277810	SPBC685.09	SPBP23A10.13	orc2	orc4	orp2	orp4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Takahashi T (2001)	11683912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248918	2541159	2541107	277674	277622	SPBC685.09	SPBC646.14c	orc2	orc5	orp2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Takahashi T (2001)	11683912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248919	2540845	2541599	277362	278096	SPBC428.13c	SPAC24B11.11c	mob1	sid2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Hou MC (2000)	10837231	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248920	2540845	2541599	277362	278096	SPBC428.13c	SPAC24B11.11c	mob1	sid2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hou MC (2000)	10837231	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248921	2541599	2540845	278096	277362	SPAC24B11.11c	SPBC428.13c	sid2	mob1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hou MC (2000)	10837231	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248922	2540845	2541599	277362	278096	SPBC428.13c	SPAC24B11.11c	mob1	sid2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hou MC (2004)	15060149	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248923	2541599	2540845	278096	277362	SPAC24B11.11c	SPBC428.13c	sid2	mob1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hou MC (2004)	15060149	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248924	2541518	2540580	278019	277106	SPAC23E2.03c	SPBC19C2.05	ste7	ran1	-	pat1	Two-hybrid	physical	Matsuyama A (2000)	10835379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248925	2541518	2542080	278019	278557	SPAC23E2.03c	SPAC27D7.03c	ste7	mei2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Matsuyama A (2000)	10835379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248926	2540580	2542080	277106	278557	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC27D7.03c	ran1	mei2	pat1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Matsuyama A (2000)	10835379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248927	2542080	2540580	278557	277106	SPAC27D7.03c	SPBC19C2.05	mei2	ran1	-	pat1	Two-hybrid	physical	Matsuyama A (2000)	10835379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248928	2540719	2538959	277242	275533	SPBC216.05	SPCC18B5.11c	rad3	cds1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Moser BA (2000)	10825192	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248929	2538816	2540292	275397	276823	SPCC1442.10c	SPBC28F2.12	rpb3	rpb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kimura M (2002)	11839823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248930	2538816	2541446	275397	277951	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC23G3.01	rpb3	rpb2	-	SPAC521.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kimura M (2002)	11839823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248931	2538816	2541011	275397	277526	SPCC1442.10c	SPBC337.14	rpb3	rpb4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kimura M (2002)	11839823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248932	2538816	2541910	275397	278400	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC23C4.15	rpb3	rpb5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kimura M (2002)	11839823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248933	2538816	2539083	275397	275655	SPCC1442.10c	SPCC1020.04c	rpb3	rpb6	-	rpo15	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kimura M (2002)	11839823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248934	2538816	2542097	275397	278573	SPCC1442.10c	SPACUNK4.06c	rpb3	rpb7	-	SPAPYUK71.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kimura M (2002)	11839823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248935	2538816	2539794	275397	276344	SPCC1442.10c	SPBC14C8.12	rpb3	rpb8	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kimura M (2002)	11839823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248936	2538816	2541470	275397	277972	SPCC1442.10c	SPAPYUG7.04c	rpb3	rpb9	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kimura M (2002)	11839823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248937	2538816	2542233	275397	278705	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC1B3.12c	rpb3	rpb10	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kimura M (2002)	11839823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248938	2538816	2543112	275397	279544	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC3A12.07	rpb3	rpb11	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kimura M (2002)	11839823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248939	2538816	2540793	275397	277312	SPCC1442.10c	SPBC19C2.03	rpb3	rpc10	-	rpb12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kimura M (2002)	11839823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248940	2538816	2542225	275397	278698	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC19B12.05c	rpb3	fcp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kimura M (2002)	11839823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248941	2542225	2538816	278698	275397	SPAC19B12.05c	SPCC1442.10c	fcp1	rpb3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kimura M (2002)	11839823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248942	2538816	2539294	275397	275862	SPCC1442.10c	SPCC1620.09c	rpb3	tfg1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kimura M (2002)	11839823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248943	2538816	2539924	275397	276468	SPCC1442.10c	SPBC1198.13c	rpb3	tfg2	-	SPBC660.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kimura M (2002)	11839823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248944	2541011	2542225	277526	278698	SPBC337.14	SPAC19B12.05c	rpb4	fcp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimura M (2002)	11839823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248945	2542225	2541011	278698	277526	SPAC19B12.05c	SPBC337.14	fcp1	rpb4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimura M (2002)	11839823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248946	2542225	2540292	278698	276823	SPAC19B12.05c	SPBC28F2.12	fcp1	rpb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kimura M (2002)	11839823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248947	2542225	2541446	278698	277951	SPAC19B12.05c	SPAC23G3.01	fcp1	rpb2	-	SPAC521.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kimura M (2002)	11839823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248948	2542225	2541910	278698	278400	SPAC19B12.05c	SPAC23C4.15	fcp1	rpb5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kimura M (2002)	11839823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248949	2542225	2539083	278698	275655	SPAC19B12.05c	SPCC1020.04c	fcp1	rpb6	-	rpo15	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kimura M (2002)	11839823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248950	2542225	2542097	278698	278573	SPAC19B12.05c	SPACUNK4.06c	fcp1	rpb7	-	SPAPYUK71.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kimura M (2002)	11839823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248951	2542225	2541011	278698	277526	SPAC19B12.05c	SPBC337.14	fcp1	rpb4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kimura M (2002)	11839823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248952	2542225	2540793	278698	277312	SPAC19B12.05c	SPBC19C2.03	fcp1	rpc10	-	rpb12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kimura M (2002)	11839823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248953	2542225	2542233	278698	278705	SPAC19B12.05c	SPAC1B3.12c	fcp1	rpb10	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kimura M (2002)	11839823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248954	2542225	2539794	278698	276344	SPAC19B12.05c	SPBC14C8.12	fcp1	rpb8	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kimura M (2002)	11839823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248955	2542225	2541470	278698	277972	SPAC19B12.05c	SPAPYUG7.04c	fcp1	rpb9	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kimura M (2002)	11839823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248956	2542225	2543112	278698	279544	SPAC19B12.05c	SPAC3A12.07	fcp1	rpb11	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kimura M (2002)	11839823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248957	2542225	2539924	278698	276468	SPAC19B12.05c	SPBC1198.13c	fcp1	tfg2	-	SPBC660.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kimura M (2002)	11839823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248958	2542225	2539294	278698	275862	SPAC19B12.05c	SPCC1620.09c	fcp1	tfg1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kimura M (2002)	11839823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248959	2542225	2541910	278698	278400	SPAC19B12.05c	SPAC23C4.15	fcp1	rpb5	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimura M (2002)	11839823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248960	2542225	2540292	278698	276823	SPAC19B12.05c	SPBC28F2.12	fcp1	rpb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimura M (2002)	11839823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248961	2539767	2540917	276318	277433	SPBC1703.06	SPBC409.05	pof10	skp1	-	psh1|sph1	Two-hybrid	physical	Ikebe C (2002)	11820777	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248962	2540917	2540917	277433	277433	SPBC409.05	SPBC409.05	skp1	skp1	psh1|sph1	psh1|sph1	Two-hybrid	physical	Ikebe C (2002)	11820777	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248963	2540917	2542914	277433	279356	SPBC409.05	SPAC57A10.05c	skp1	pof1	psh1|sph1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Ikebe C (2002)	11820777	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248964	2540917	2539767	277433	276318	SPBC409.05	SPBC1703.06	skp1	pof10	psh1|sph1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ikebe C (2002)	11820777	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248965	2542029	2542080	278511	278557	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC27D7.03c	rad24	mei2	anr5|sam4	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Sato M (2002)	11818066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248966	2542029	2542080	278511	278557	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC27D7.03c	rad24	mei2	anr5|sam4	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sato M (2002)	11818066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248967	2539527	2542393	276089	278857	SPCC338.16	SPAC17G6.12	pof3	cul1	-	pcu1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Katayama S (2002)	11809834	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248968	2542393	2539527	278857	276089	SPAC17G6.12	SPCC338.16	cul1	pof3	pcu1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Katayama S (2002)	11809834	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248969	2540917	2539527	277433	276089	SPBC409.05	SPCC338.16	skp1	pof3	psh1|sph1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Katayama S (2002)	11809834	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248970	2540020	2542727	276564	279177	SPBC16D10.09	SPAC26A3.02	pcn1	myh1	pcn	myh	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chang DY (2002)	11805113	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248971	2540481	2541768	277009	278262	SPBC2D10.12	SPAC11G7.04	rhp23	ubi1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Elder RT (2002)	11788722	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248972	2540481	2542428	277009	278890	SPBC2D10.12	SPAC1805.12c	rhp23	uep1	-	ubi2	Two-hybrid	physical	Elder RT (2002)	11788722	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248973	2540481	2541445	277009	277950	SPBC2D10.12	SPAC6G10.11c	rhp23	ubi3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Elder RT (2002)	11788722	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248974	2540481	2542667	277009	279120	SPBC2D10.12	SPAC26A3.16	rhp23	dph1	-	ucp5	Two-hybrid	physical	Elder RT (2002)	11788722	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248975	2541633	2542387	278129	278851	SPAC664.01c	SPAC17H9.20	swi6	psc3	SPAC824.10c	SPAC607.01	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nonaka N (2002)	11780129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248976	2542387	2541633	278851	278129	SPAC17H9.20	SPAC664.01c	psc3	swi6	SPAC607.01	SPAC824.10c	Two-hybrid	physical	Nonaka N (2002)	11780129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248977	2538694	2538694	275279	275279	SPCC191.09c	SPCC191.09c	gst1	gst1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Veal EA (2002)	12063243	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248978	2538694	2539601	275279	276159	SPCC191.09c	SPCC965.07c	gst1	gst2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Veal EA (2002)	12063243	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248979	2539601	2539601	276159	276159	SPCC965.07c	SPCC965.07c	gst2	gst2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Veal EA (2002)	12063243	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248980	2543479	2543479	279899	279899	SPAC688.04c	SPAC688.04c	gst3	gst3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Veal EA (2002)	12063243	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248981	2543204	2543539	279633	279956	SPAC821.04c	SPAC926.04c	cid13	hsp90	-	git10|swo1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saitoh S (2002)	12062100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248982	2543204	2542029	279633	278511	SPAC821.04c	SPAC8E11.02c	cid13	rad24	-	anr5|sam4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saitoh S (2002)	12062100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248983	2543204	2542252	279633	278722	SPAC821.04c	SPAC17A2.13c	cid13	rad25	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saitoh S (2002)	12062100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248984	2543204	2542795	279633	279243	SPAC821.04c	SPAC9G1.05	cid13	aip1	-	SPAC9G1.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saitoh S (2002)	12062100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248985	2543204	2541505	279633	278007	SPAC821.04c	SPAC57A7.04c	cid13	pabp	-	pab1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Saitoh S (2002)	12062100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248987	2543580	2543086	279995	279519	SPAC644.14c	SPAC30D11.10	rad51	rad52	rhp51	rad22|rad22A	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kim WJ (2002)	12050150	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248988	2543580	2543086	279995	279519	SPAC644.14c	SPAC30D11.10	rad51	rad52	rhp51	rad22|rad22A	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kim WJ (2001)	11292845	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248989	2543580	2543086	279995	279519	SPAC644.14c	SPAC30D11.10	rad51	rad52	rhp51	rad22|rad22A	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kim WJ (2002)	12050150	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248990	2543580	2543086	279995	279519	SPAC644.14c	SPAC30D11.10	rad51	rad52	rhp51	rad22|rad22A	Two-hybrid	physical	Kim WJ (2002)	12050150	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248991	2543086	2543580	279519	279995	SPAC30D11.10	SPAC644.14c	rad52	rad51	rad22|rad22A	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Kim WJ (2002)	12050150	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248992	2543580	2543086	279995	279519	SPAC644.14c	SPAC30D11.10	rad51	rad52	rhp51	rad22|rad22A	Two-hybrid	physical	Kim WJ (2001)	11292845	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248993	2543086	2543580	279519	279995	SPAC30D11.10	SPAC644.14c	rad52	rad51	rad22|rad22A	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Kim WJ (2001)	11292845	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248994	2543580	2543580	279995	279995	SPAC644.14c	SPAC644.14c	rad51	rad51	rhp51	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Kim WJ (2002)	12050150	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248995	2543580	2543580	279995	279995	SPAC644.14c	SPAC644.14c	rad51	rad51	rhp51	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Kim WJ (2001)	11292845	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248996	2543086	2543086	279519	279519	SPAC30D11.10	SPAC30D11.10	rad52	rad52	rad22|rad22A	rad22|rad22A	Two-hybrid	physical	Kim WJ (2002)	12050150	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
248997	2541936	2542162	278423	278638	SPAC222.10c	SPAC6F6.08c	byr4	cdc16	-	bub2	Two-hybrid	physical	Furge KA (1998)	9742395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249001	2538816	2541446	275397	277951	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC23G3.01	rpb3	rpb2	-	SPAC521.06	Two-hybrid	physical	Miyao T (1998)	9738888	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249002	2541910	2540292	278400	276823	SPAC23C4.15	SPBC28F2.12	rpb5	rpb1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miyao T (1998)	9738888	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249003	2540307	2542438	276837	278900	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC17C9.01c	apc10	nuc2	SPBC1E8.06	SPAC1851.01|apc3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kominami K (1998)	9736616	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249004	2541268	2543040	277782	279475	SPBP19A11.03c	SPAC31G5.13	mts4	rpn11	rpn1	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Penney M (1998)	9727008	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249005	2542103	2540936	278579	277452	SPAC31G5.11	SPBC800.05c	pac2	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Vega LR (1998)	9725898	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249006	2539817	2541319	276367	277831	SPBC146.03c	SPBP4H10.06c	cut3	cut14	smc4	smc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sutani T (1999)	10485849	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249007	2541319	2539817	277831	276367	SPBP4H10.06c	SPBC146.03c	cut14	cut3	smc2	smc4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sutani T (1999)	10485849	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249008	2539817	2541201	276367	277715	SPBC146.03c	SPBC776.13	cut3	cnd1	smc4	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sutani T (1999)	10485849	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249009	2539817	2538744	276367	275327	SPBC146.03c	SPCC306.03c	cut3	cnd2	smc4	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sutani T (1999)	10485849	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249010	2539817	2539121	276367	275693	SPBC146.03c	SPCC188.03	cut3	cnd3	smc4	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sutani T (1999)	10485849	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249011	2541319	2541201	277831	277715	SPBP4H10.06c	SPBC776.13	cut14	cnd1	smc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sutani T (1999)	10485849	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249012	2541319	2538744	277831	275327	SPBP4H10.06c	SPCC306.03c	cut14	cnd2	smc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sutani T (1999)	10485849	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249013	2541319	2539121	277831	275693	SPBP4H10.06c	SPCC188.03	cut14	cnd3	smc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sutani T (1999)	10485849	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249014	2541847	2539669	278338	276224	SPAC22H10.10	SPBC11C11.04c	alp21	alp1	sto1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Radcliffe PA (1999)	10473641	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249015	2539669	2541847	276224	278338	SPBC11C11.04c	SPAC22H10.10	alp1	alp21	-	sto1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Radcliffe PA (1999)	10473641	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249016	2541847	2542814	278338	279261	SPAC22H10.10	SPAC13D6.05	alp21	alp11	sto1	SPAC4G9.01	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Radcliffe PA (1999)	10473641	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249017	2542814	2541847	279261	278338	SPAC13D6.05	SPAC22H10.10	alp11	alp21	SPAC4G9.01	sto1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Radcliffe PA (1999)	10473641	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249018	2541847	2540936	278338	277452	SPAC22H10.10	SPBC800.05c	alp21	atb2	sto1	alp2|ban5|tub1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Radcliffe PA (1999)	10473641	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249019	2542814	2540936	279261	277452	SPAC13D6.05	SPBC800.05c	alp11	atb2	SPAC4G9.01	alp2|ban5|tub1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Radcliffe PA (1999)	10473641	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249020	2540070	2540580	276608	277106	SPBC119.04	SPBC19C2.05	mei3	ran1	-	pat1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Wang W (1998)	9799254	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	No Modification	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249021	2540070	2540580	276608	277106	SPBC119.04	SPBC19C2.05	mei3	ran1	-	pat1	Two-hybrid	physical	Wang W (1998)	9799254	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249022	2540027	2539869	276571	276415	SPBC1734.14c	SPBC11B10.09	suc1	cdc2	p13	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gould KL (1998)	9790601	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249023	2540880	2539869	277397	276415	SPBC582.03	SPBC11B10.09	cdc13	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gould KL (1998)	9790601	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249024	2543143	2541514	279575	278015	SPAPB1A10.04c	SPAC2E1P5.04c	cwp1	cwg2	-	orb7	Two-hybrid	physical	Arellano M (1998)	9781874	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249025	2541514	2543143	278015	279575	SPAC2E1P5.04c	SPAPB1A10.04c	cwg2	cwp1	orb7	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Arellano M (1998)	9781874	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249026	2542608	2541402	279062	277911	SPAC19G12.12	SPBPJ4664.01	dlp1	dps1	coq1	SPBPJ694.01|dps	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Saiki R (2003)	14519123	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249027	2539997	2542617	276541	279071	SPBC1604.14c	SPAC13A11.01c	shk1	rga8	orb2|pak1	SPAC2F7.18c	Two-hybrid	physical	Yang P (2003)	14506270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249028	2542617	2539997	279071	276541	SPAC13A11.01c	SPBC1604.14c	rga8	shk1	SPAC2F7.18c	orb2|pak1	Two-hybrid	physical	Yang P (2003)	14506270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249029	2542617	2542617	279071	279071	SPAC13A11.01c	SPAC13A11.01c	rga8	rga8	SPAC2F7.18c	SPAC2F7.18c	Two-hybrid	physical	Yang P (2003)	14506270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249030	2542617	2541468	279071	277970	SPAC13A11.01c	SPAC1F5.09c	rga8	shk2	SPAC2F7.18c	pak2	Two-hybrid	physical	Yang P (2003)	14506270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249031	2542617	2539997	279071	276541	SPAC13A11.01c	SPBC1604.14c	rga8	shk1	SPAC2F7.18c	orb2|pak1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yang P (2003)	14506270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249032	2542635	2543027	279089	279463	SPAC24H6.09	SPAC110.03	gef1	cdc42	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Hirota K (2003)	12972551	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249033	2542635	2543027	279089	279463	SPAC24H6.09	SPAC110.03	gef1	cdc42	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hirota K (2003)	12972551	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249034	3361306	2542757	280382	279207	SPBC6B1.09c	SPAC13C5.07	nbs1	mre11	slr10	rad32	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chahwan C (2003)	12944482	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249035	3361306	2542757	280382	279207	SPBC6B1.09c	SPAC13C5.07	nbs1	mre11	slr10	rad32	Two-hybrid	physical	Ueno M (2003)	12944481	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249036	2543589	2539659	280004	276214	SPAC4F10.15c	SPBC146.13c	wsp1	myo1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Carnahan RH (2003)	12939254	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249037	2539659	2541975	276214	278460	SPBC146.13c	SPAC20G8.05c	myo1	cdc15	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Carnahan RH (2003)	12939254	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249038	2539659	2543589	276214	280004	SPBC146.13c	SPAC4F10.15c	myo1	wsp1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Carnahan RH (2003)	12939254	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249039	2541975	2539659	278460	276214	SPAC20G8.05c	SPBC146.13c	cdc15	myo1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Carnahan RH (2003)	12939254	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249040	2541603	2541975	278100	278460	SPAC1F5.04c	SPAC20G8.05c	cdc12	cdc15	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Carnahan RH (2003)	12939254	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249041	2541603	2541975	278100	278460	SPAC1F5.04c	SPAC20G8.05c	cdc12	cdc15	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Carnahan RH (2003)	12939254	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249042	2541975	2541603	278460	278100	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC1F5.04c	cdc15	cdc12	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Carnahan RH (2003)	12939254	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249043	2543544	2543086	279961	279519	SPAC664.07c	SPAC30D11.10	rad9	rad52	-	rad22|rad22A	Co-localization	physical	Meister P (2003)	12930957	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249044	2540992	2543086	277508	279519	SPBC342.05	SPAC30D11.10	crb2	rad52	rhp9	rad22|rad22A	Co-localization	physical	Du LL (2003)	12917337	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249045	2542097	2541942	278573	278429	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC222.09	rpb7	seb1	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Mitsuzawa H (2003)	12907709	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249046	2541942	2542097	278429	278573	SPAC222.09	SPACUNK4.06c	seb1	rpb7	-	SPAPYUK71.02	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Mitsuzawa H (2003)	12907709	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249047	2538959	2540802	275533	277321	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC1921.02	cds1	rad60	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Boddy MN (2003)	12897162	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249048	2538959	2540802	275533	277321	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC1921.02	cds1	rad60	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Boddy MN (2003)	12897162	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249053	2541677	2541677	278173	278173	SPAC1565.04c	SPAC1565.04c	ste4	ste4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Barr MM (1996)	8816472	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249055	2541916	2540362	278406	276891	SPAC23C4.19	SPBC2F12.08c	spt5	ceg1	-	pce1	Two-hybrid	physical	Pei Y (2002)	11893740	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249056	2540362	2541916	276891	278406	SPBC2F12.08c	SPAC23C4.19	ceg1	spt5	pce1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Pei Y (2002)	11893740	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249057	2541916	2543671	278406	280085	SPAC23C4.19	SPAC644.04	spt5	pct1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Pei Y (2002)	11893740	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249058	2543671	2541916	280085	278406	SPAC644.04	SPAC23C4.19	pct1	spt5	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Pei Y (2002)	11893740	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249059	2540700	2541916	277224	278406	SPBC21C3.16c	SPAC23C4.19	spt4	spt5	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Pei Y (2002)	11893740	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249060	2540362	2540292	276891	276823	SPBC2F12.08c	SPBC28F2.12	ceg1	rpb1	pce1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Pei Y (2002)	11893740	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249061	2540292	2540362	276823	276891	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC2F12.08c	rpb1	ceg1	-	pce1	Two-hybrid	physical	Pei Y (2002)	11893740	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249062	2540362	2540292	276891	276823	SPBC2F12.08c	SPBC28F2.12	ceg1	rpb1	pce1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Pei Y (2001)	11387325	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249063	2540292	2540362	276823	276891	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC2F12.08c	rpb1	ceg1	-	pce1	Two-hybrid	physical	Pei Y (2001)	11387325	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249064	2543671	2540292	280085	276823	SPAC644.04	SPBC28F2.12	pct1	rpb1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Pei Y (2002)	11893740	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249065	2540292	2543671	276823	280085	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC644.04	rpb1	pct1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Pei Y (2002)	11893740	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249066	2543671	2540292	280085	276823	SPAC644.04	SPBC28F2.12	pct1	rpb1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Pei Y (2001)	11387325	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249067	2540292	2543671	276823	280085	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC644.04	rpb1	pct1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Pei Y (2001)	11387325	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249068	2541916	2543671	278406	280085	SPAC23C4.19	SPAC644.04	spt5	pct1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Pei Y (2002)	11893740	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249069	2541916	2540362	278406	276891	SPAC23C4.19	SPBC2F12.08c	spt5	ceg1	-	pce1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Pei Y (2002)	11893740	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249070	2543671	2541916	280085	278406	SPAC644.04	SPAC23C4.19	pct1	spt5	-	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Pei Y (2002)	11893740	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249071	2540362	2541916	276891	278406	SPBC2F12.08c	SPAC23C4.19	ceg1	spt5	pce1	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Pei Y (2002)	11893740	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249072	2541982	2541652	278467	278148	SPAC23A1.06c	SPAC24B11.06c	cmk2	sty1	mkp2	phh1|spc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sanchez-Piris M (2002)	11886858	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249073	2541652	2541982	278148	278467	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC23A1.06c	sty1	cmk2	phh1|spc1	mkp2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sanchez-Piris M (2002)	11886858	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249074	2543086	2543580	279519	279995	SPAC30D11.10	SPAC644.14c	rad52	rad51	rad22|rad22A	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	van den Bosch M (2002)	11884628	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249075	2543580	2543086	279995	279519	SPAC644.14c	SPAC30D11.10	rad51	rad52	rhp51	rad22|rad22A	Two-hybrid	physical	van den Bosch M (2002)	11884628	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249076	2543580	2542749	279995	279199	SPAC644.14c	SPAC15A10.03c	rad51	rad54	rhp51	rhp54	Two-hybrid	physical	van den Bosch M (2002)	11884628	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249077	2543086	2543580	279519	279995	SPAC30D11.10	SPAC644.14c	rad52	rad51	rad22|rad22A	rhp51	Reconstituted Complex	physical	van den Bosch M (2002)	11884628	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249078	2543583	2541124	279998	277639	SPAC644.12	SPBC646.02	cdc5	cwf11	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ohi MD (2002)	11884590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249079	2543583	2539984	279998	276528	SPAC644.12	SPBC1289.11	cdc5	spf38	-	cwf17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ohi MD (2002)	11884590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249080	2543583	2538901	279998	275479	SPAC644.12	SPCP1E11.07c	cdc5	cwf18	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ohi MD (2002)	11884590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249081	2543583	2543189	279998	279618	SPAC644.12	SPAC30D11.09	cdc5	cwf19	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ohi MD (2002)	11884590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249082	2543583	2539503	279998	276066	SPAC644.12	SPCC4B3.14	cdc5	cwf20	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ohi MD (2002)	11884590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249083	2543583	2538974	279998	275548	SPAC644.12	SPCC550.02c	cdc5	cwf5	-	ecm2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ohi MD (2002)	11884590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249084	2543583	2538988	279998	275562	SPAC644.12	SPCC188.11	cdc5	prp45	-	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ohi MD (2002)	11884590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249085	2543583	2539984	279998	276528	SPAC644.12	SPBC1289.11	cdc5	spf38	-	cwf17	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ohi MD (2002)	11884590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249086	2543583	2540585	279998	277111	SPAC644.12	SPBC28F2.04c	cdc5	cwf7	-	spf27	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ohi MD (2002)	11884590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249087	2543583	2541124	279998	277639	SPAC644.12	SPBC646.02	cdc5	cwf11	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ohi MD (2002)	11884590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249088	2543583	2540230	279998	276762	SPAC644.12	SPBC32F12.05c	cdc5	cwf12	-	isy1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ohi MD (2002)	11884590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249089	2539322	2543583	275888	279998	SPCC1840.10	SPAC644.12	lsm8	cdc5	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ohi MD (2002)	11884590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249090	2543666	2540468	280080	276996	SPAC644.06c	SPBC23G7.04c	cdr1	nif1	nim1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Wu L (1997)	9135149	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249091	2540468	2543666	276996	280080	SPBC23G7.04c	SPAC644.06c	nif1	cdr1	-	nim1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wu L (1997)	9135149	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249092	2541603	2541940	278100	278427	SPAC1F5.04c	SPAC27F1.02c	cdc12	cdc8	-	fus4	Co-localization	physical	Chang F (1997)	9105045	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249093	2541603	2543526	278100	279944	SPAC1F5.04c	SPAC4A8.15c	cdc12	cdc3	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Chang F (1997)	9105045	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249094	2541603	2541975	278100	278460	SPAC1F5.04c	SPAC20G8.05c	cdc12	cdc15	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Chang F (1997)	9105045	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249095	2541603	2541699	278100	278195	SPAC1F5.04c	SPAP8A3.08	cdc12	cdc4	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Chang F (1997)	9105045	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249096	2543526	2541603	279944	278100	SPAC4A8.15c	SPAC1F5.04c	cdc3	cdc12	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chang F (1997)	9105045	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249097	2539627	2540020	276184	276564	SPBC1734.02c	SPBC16D10.09	cdc27	pcn1	SPBC337.18c	pcn	Protein-peptide	physical	Bermudez VP (2002)	12124382	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249098	2543039	2541455	279474	277958	SPAC3A12.14	SPAC6G9.06c	cam1	pcp1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Flory MR (2002)	11864908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249099	2539407	2538952	275972	275526	SPCC970.09	SPCC1235.10c	sec8	sec6	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang H (2002)	11854409	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249100	2539407	2542843	275972	279289	SPCC970.09	SPAC13F5.06c	sec8	sec10	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang H (2002)	11854409	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249101	2539407	2540127	275972	276664	SPCC970.09	SPBC106.20	sec8	exo70	-	SPBC582.02	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang H (2002)	11854409	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249102	3361420	2540352	280496	276881	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPBC215.03c	csn2	csn1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mundt KE (2002)	11854407	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249103	2540352	3361420	276881	280496	SPBC215.03c	SPAPB17E12.04c	csn1	csn2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mundt KE (2002)	11854407	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249104	3361420	2541517	280496	278018	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPAC22A12.03c	csn2	csn4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mundt KE (2002)	11854407	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249105	2541517	3361420	278018	280496	SPAC22A12.03c	SPAPB17E12.04c	csn4	csn2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mundt KE (2002)	11854407	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249106	3361420	2541529	280496	278029	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPAC1687.13c	csn2	csn5	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mundt KE (2002)	11854407	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249107	2541529	3361420	278029	280496	SPAC1687.13c	SPAPB17E12.04c	csn5	csn2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mundt KE (2002)	11854407	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249108	2542393	2540129	278857	276666	SPAC17G6.12	SPBC12D12.08c	cul1	ned8	pcu1	SPBC24C6.01c|nedd8|ubl1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mundt KE (2002)	11854407	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249109	2540470	2541159	276998	277674	SPBC29A10.15	SPBC685.09	orc1	orc2	cdc30|orp1|rid1	orp2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chuang RY (2002)	11850415	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249110	2540470	2543248	276998	279676	SPBC29A10.15	SPAC3H1.01c	orc1	orc3	cdc30|orp1|rid1	SPAP14E8.06c|orp3	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chuang RY (2002)	11850415	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249111	2540470	2541298	276998	277810	SPBC29A10.15	SPBP23A10.13	orc1	orc4	cdc30|orp1|rid1	orp4	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chuang RY (2002)	11850415	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249112	2540470	2541107	276998	277622	SPBC29A10.15	SPBC646.14c	orc1	orc5	cdc30|orp1|rid1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chuang RY (2002)	11850415	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249113	2540470	2540438	276998	276966	SPBC29A10.15	SPBC2A9.12	orc1	orc6	cdc30|orp1|rid1	SPBC2D10.02	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chuang RY (2002)	11850415	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249114	2541159	2543248	277674	279676	SPBC685.09	SPAC3H1.01c	orc2	orc3	orp2	SPAP14E8.06c|orp3	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chuang RY (2002)	11850415	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249115	2541159	2541298	277674	277810	SPBC685.09	SPBP23A10.13	orc2	orc4	orp2	orp4	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chuang RY (2002)	11850415	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249116	2541159	2541107	277674	277622	SPBC685.09	SPBC646.14c	orc2	orc5	orp2	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chuang RY (2002)	11850415	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249117	2541159	2540438	277674	276966	SPBC685.09	SPBC2A9.12	orc2	orc6	orp2	SPBC2D10.02	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chuang RY (2002)	11850415	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249118	2543248	2541298	279676	277810	SPAC3H1.01c	SPBP23A10.13	orc3	orc4	SPAP14E8.06c|orp3	orp4	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chuang RY (2002)	11850415	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249119	2543248	2541107	279676	277622	SPAC3H1.01c	SPBC646.14c	orc3	orc5	SPAP14E8.06c|orp3	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chuang RY (2002)	11850415	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249120	2543248	2540438	279676	276966	SPAC3H1.01c	SPBC2A9.12	orc3	orc6	SPAP14E8.06c|orp3	SPBC2D10.02	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chuang RY (2002)	11850415	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249121	2541298	2541107	277810	277622	SPBP23A10.13	SPBC646.14c	orc4	orc5	orp4	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chuang RY (2002)	11850415	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249122	2541298	2540438	277810	276966	SPBP23A10.13	SPBC2A9.12	orc4	orc6	orp4	SPBC2D10.02	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chuang RY (2002)	11850415	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249123	2541107	2540438	277622	276966	SPBC646.14c	SPBC2A9.12	orc5	orc6	-	SPBC2D10.02	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chuang RY (2002)	11850415	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249124	2540013	2540470	276557	276998	SPBC14C8.07c	SPBC29A10.15	cdc18	orc1	-	cdc30|orp1|rid1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chuang RY (2002)	11850415	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249125	2540013	2541159	276557	277674	SPBC14C8.07c	SPBC685.09	cdc18	orc2	-	orp2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chuang RY (2002)	11850415	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249126	2540013	2543248	276557	279676	SPBC14C8.07c	SPAC3H1.01c	cdc18	orc3	-	SPAP14E8.06c|orp3	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chuang RY (2002)	11850415	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249127	2540013	2541298	276557	277810	SPBC14C8.07c	SPBP23A10.13	cdc18	orc4	-	orp4	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chuang RY (2002)	11850415	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249128	2540013	2541107	276557	277622	SPBC14C8.07c	SPBC646.14c	cdc18	orc5	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chuang RY (2002)	11850415	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249129	2540013	2540438	276557	276966	SPBC14C8.07c	SPBC2A9.12	cdc18	orc6	-	SPBC2D10.02	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chuang RY (2002)	11850415	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249130	2541871	2540234	278361	276766	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC336.12c	res2	cdc10	mcs1|pct1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Zhu Y (1997)	9118941	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249131	2541871	2540234	278361	276766	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC336.12c	res2	cdc10	mcs1|pct1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Zhu Y (1997)	9118941	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249132	2540234	2541871	276766	278361	SPBC336.12c	SPAC22F3.09c	cdc10	res2	-	mcs1|pct1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Zhu Y (1997)	9118941	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249133	2541871	2541871	278361	278361	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC22F3.09c	res2	res2	mcs1|pct1	mcs1|pct1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Zhu Y (1997)	9118941	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249134	2541153	2541871	277668	278361	SPBC725.16	SPAC22F3.09c	res1	res2	sct1	mcs1|pct1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Zhu Y (1997)	9118941	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249135	2540234	2541153	276766	277668	SPBC336.12c	SPBC725.16	cdc10	res1	-	sct1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Zhu Y (1997)	9118941	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249136	2539649	2543298	276204	279723	SPBC12D12.04c	SPAC6B12.15	pck2	cpc2	pkc1|sts6	rkp1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Won M (2001)	11263963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249137	2543298	2539649	279723	276204	SPAC6B12.15	SPBC12D12.04c	cpc2	pck2	rkp1	pkc1|sts6	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Won M (2001)	11263963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249138	2539659	2543039	276214	279474	SPBC146.13c	SPAC3A12.14	myo1	cam1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Toya M (2001)	11260263	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249139	2541185	2539312	277699	275879	SPBC6B1.07	SPCC777.14	prp1	prp4	zer1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Schwelnus W (2001)	11252721	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249140	2539312	2541185	275879	277699	SPCC777.14	SPBC6B1.07	prp4	prp1	-	zer1	Two-hybrid	physical	Schwelnus W (2001)	11252721	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249141	2539728	2539728	276280	276280	SPBC14F5.12c	SPBC14F5.12c	cbh2	cbh2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Irelan JT (2001)	11238404	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249142	2539971	2539971	276515	276515	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC1105.04c	cbp1	cbp1	abp1	abp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Irelan JT (2001)	11238404	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249143	2538988	2542482	275562	278942	SPCC188.11	SPAP8A3.06	prp45	uaf2	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	SPAP8A3.06|ods2	Two-hybrid	physical	Ambrozkova M (2001)	11414703	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249144	2538988	2542482	275562	278942	SPCC188.11	SPAP8A3.06	prp45	uaf2	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	SPAP8A3.06|ods2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ambrozkova M (2001)	11414703	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249145	2542482	2538988	278942	275562	SPAP8A3.06	SPCC188.11	uaf2	prp45	SPAP8A3.06|ods2	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ambrozkova M (2001)	11414703	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249146	2538988	2538988	275562	275562	SPCC188.11	SPCC188.11	prp45	prp45	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	Two-hybrid	physical	Ambrozkova M (2001)	11414703	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249147	2538988	2538988	275562	275562	SPCC188.11	SPCC188.11	prp45	prp45	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ambrozkova M (2001)	11414703	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249150	2541153	2541871	277668	278361	SPBC725.16	SPAC22F3.09c	res1	res2	sct1	mcs1|pct1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Aranda A (2001)	11389847	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249151	2541018	2541871	277533	278361	SPBC3B9.11c	SPAC22F3.09c	ctf1	res2	-	mcs1|pct1	Two-hybrid	physical	Aranda A (2001)	11389847	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249152	2540072	2542891	276610	279335	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC6F12.12	ppa2	par2	-	pbp2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tanabe O (2001)	11380623	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249153	2540585	2542256	277111	278726	SPBC28F2.04c	SPAC29A4.08c	cwf7	prp19	spf27	cwf8	Two-hybrid	physical	Ohi MD (2002)	12088152	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249154	2541530	2540580	278030	277106	SPAC57A10.10c	SPBC19C2.05	sla1	ran1	-	pat1	Two-hybrid	physical	Tanabe K (2003)	14665462	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249155	2540574	3361456	277101	280532	SPBC409.03	SPAC1142.03c	swi5	swi2	-	SPAC17G6.20c	Two-hybrid	physical	Akamatsu Y (2003)	14663140	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249156	3361456	2540574	280532	277101	SPAC1142.03c	SPBC409.03	swi2	swi5	SPAC17G6.20c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Akamatsu Y (2003)	14663140	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249157	3361456	2543580	280532	279995	SPAC1142.03c	SPAC644.14c	swi2	rad51	SPAC17G6.20c	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Akamatsu Y (2003)	14663140	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249158	2540574	3361456	277101	280532	SPBC409.03	SPAC1142.03c	swi5	swi2	-	SPAC17G6.20c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Akamatsu Y (2003)	14663140	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249159	2543580	3361456	279995	280532	SPAC644.14c	SPAC1142.03c	rad51	swi2	rhp51	SPAC17G6.20c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Akamatsu Y (2003)	14663140	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249160	2540574	2543580	277101	279995	SPBC409.03	SPAC644.14c	swi5	rad51	-	rhp51	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Akamatsu Y (2003)	14663140	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249161	3361456	2541633	280532	278129	SPAC1142.03c	SPAC664.01c	swi2	swi6	SPAC17G6.20c	SPAC824.10c	Two-hybrid	physical	Akamatsu Y (2003)	14663140	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249162	2540584	2540574	277110	277101	SPBC28F2.07	SPBC409.03	sfr1	swi5	dds20|mug13	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Akamatsu Y (2003)	14663140	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249163	2540584	2543580	277110	279995	SPBC28F2.07	SPAC644.14c	sfr1	rad51	dds20|mug13	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Akamatsu Y (2003)	14663140	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249164	2540584	2540574	277110	277101	SPBC28F2.07	SPBC409.03	sfr1	swi5	dds20|mug13	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Akamatsu Y (2003)	14663140	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249165	2540574	2540584	277101	277110	SPBC409.03	SPBC28F2.07	swi5	sfr1	-	dds20|mug13	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Akamatsu Y (2003)	14663140	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249166	2540584	2543580	277110	279995	SPBC28F2.07	SPAC644.14c	sfr1	rad51	dds20|mug13	rhp51	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Akamatsu Y (2003)	14663140	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249167	2539080	2543069	275652	279502	SPCC1235.06	SPAC3A11.05c	sif1	kms1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249168	2543069	2539080	279502	275652	SPAC3A11.05c	SPCC1235.06	kms1	sif1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249169	2539080	2539914	275652	276458	SPCC1235.06	SPBC12D12.01	sif1	sad1	-	SPBC16H5.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249170	2539914	2539080	276458	275652	SPBC12D12.01	SPCC1235.06	sad1	sif1	SPBC16H5.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249171	2539080	2539080	275652	275652	SPCC1235.06	SPCC1235.06	sif1	sif1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249172	2538886	2543069	275464	279502	SPCC895.04c	SPAC3A11.05c	ufe1	kms1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249173	2543069	2538886	279502	275464	SPAC3A11.05c	SPCC895.04c	kms1	ufe1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249174	2538886	2539914	275464	276458	SPCC895.04c	SPBC12D12.01	ufe1	sad1	-	SPBC16H5.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249175	2539914	2538886	276458	275464	SPBC12D12.01	SPCC895.04c	sad1	ufe1	SPBC16H5.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249176	2538886	2538886	275464	275464	SPCC895.04c	SPCC895.04c	ufe1	ufe1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249177	3361491	2543069	280567	279502	SPAC1805.08	SPAC3A11.05c	dlc1	kms1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249178	2543069	3361491	279502	280567	SPAC3A11.05c	SPAC1805.08	kms1	dlc1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249179	2539914	2543069	276458	279502	SPBC12D12.01	SPAC3A11.05c	sad1	kms1	SPBC16H5.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249180	2543069	2539914	279502	276458	SPAC3A11.05c	SPBC12D12.01	kms1	sad1	-	SPBC16H5.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249181	2539914	2539914	276458	276458	SPBC12D12.01	SPBC12D12.01	sad1	sad1	SPBC16H5.01c	SPBC16H5.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249182	2539914	2539175	276458	275746	SPBC12D12.01	SPCC16C4.01	sad1	sif2	SPBC16H5.01c	SPCC5E4.09	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249183	2539914	2543091	276458	279524	SPBC12D12.01	SPAC12G12.15	sad1	sif3	SPBC16H5.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249184	2539914	2543045	276458	279480	SPBC12D12.01	SPAC12G12.11c	sad1	SPAC12G12.11c	SPBC16H5.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249185	2539914	2539743	276458	276295	SPBC12D12.01	SPBC16A3.08c	sad1	oga1	SPBC16H5.01c	SPBC16A3.08c	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249186	2539914	2543108	276458	279540	SPBC12D12.01	SPAC3A12.13c	sad1	SPAC3A12.13c	SPBC16H5.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249187	2539914	2540380	276458	276909	SPBC12D12.01	SPBC1A4.05	sad1	blt1	SPBC16H5.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249189	2539914	2539144	276458	275716	SPBC12D12.01	SPCC16A11.14	sad1	sfh1	SPBC16H5.01c	SPNCRNA.125	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249190	2539914	2541585	276458	278082	SPBC12D12.01	SPAC14C4.05c	sad1	man1	SPBC16H5.01c	heh2|mug61	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249191	2539914	2541926	276458	278414	SPBC12D12.01	SPAC222.14c	sad1	SPAC222.14c	SPBC16H5.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249192	2539914	2539537	276458	276099	SPBC12D12.01	SPCP1E11.04c	sad1	pal1	SPBC16H5.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249193	2539914	2541013	276458	277528	SPBC12D12.01	SPBC3H7.13	sad1	far10	SPBC16H5.01c	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249194	2539914	2540324	276458	276854	SPBC12D12.01	SPBC29A3.16	sad1	rrs1	SPBC16H5.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249195	2539914	2542121	276458	278597	SPBC12D12.01	SPAC17H9.05	sad1	ebp2	SPBC16H5.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249196	2539914	2542466	276458	278927	SPBC12D12.01	SPAC19E9.01c	sad1	nup40	SPBC16H5.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249197	2539914	2541306	276458	277818	SPBC12D12.01	SPBP16F5.07	sad1	apm1	SPBC16H5.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249198	2539914	2539493	276458	276056	SPBC12D12.01	SPCC417.05c	sad1	cfh2	SPBC16H5.01c	chr2	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249199	2539914	2540992	276458	277508	SPBC12D12.01	SPBC342.05	sad1	crb2	SPBC16H5.01c	rhp9	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249200	2539914	2543344	276458	279766	SPBC12D12.01	SPAC56E4.04c	sad1	cut6	SPBC16H5.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249201	2539914	2541247	276458	277761	SPBC12D12.01	SPBC947.12	sad1	kms2	SPBC16H5.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249202	2539914	2540650	276458	277175	SPBC12D12.01	SPBC244.01c	sad1	sid4	SPBC16H5.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249203	2539914	2543479	276458	279899	SPBC12D12.01	SPAC688.04c	sad1	gst3	SPBC16H5.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249204	2539517	2542293	276079	278761	SPCC576.15c	SPAC17G8.14c	ksg1	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Graeub R (2003)	14625898	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249205	2541165	2541633	277680	278129	SPBC776.12c	SPAC664.01c	hsk1	swi6	cdc7	SPAC824.10c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bailis JM (2003)	14625560	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249208	2542099	2540960	278575	277476	SPAC24H6.12c	SPBC3D6.02	uba3	but2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Yashiroda H (2003)	14623327	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249209	2541144	2540806	277659	277325	SPBC685.06	SPBC18E5.06	rps001	rps21	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Sato M (2003)	14623272	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249210	2540806	2541144	277325	277659	SPBC18E5.06	SPBC685.06	rps21	rps001	-	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sato M (2003)	14623272	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249211	2540806	2543293	277325	279718	SPBC18E5.06	SPAPJ698.02c	rps21	rps002	-	rps0|rps0-2|rpsa-2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sato M (2003)	14623272	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249212	2540574	2540574	277101	277101	SPBC409.03	SPBC409.03	swi5	swi5	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Akamatsu Y (2003)	14663140	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249213	2540584	2540584	277110	277110	SPBC28F2.07	SPBC28F2.07	sfr1	sfr1	dds20|mug13	dds20|mug13	Two-hybrid	physical	Akamatsu Y (2003)	14663140	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249214	2538762	2538762	275345	275345	SPCC306.04c	SPCC306.04c	set1	set1	kmt2	kmt2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249215	2538762	2539667	275345	276222	SPCC306.04c	SPBC13G1.08c	set1	ash2	kmt2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249216	2539667	2538762	276222	275345	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC306.04c	ash2	set1	-	kmt2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249217	2538762	2540929	275345	277445	SPCC306.04c	SPBC354.03	set1	swd3	kmt2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249218	2540929	2538762	277445	275345	SPBC354.03	SPCC306.04c	swd3	set1	-	kmt2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249219	2538762	2541776	275345	278270	SPCC306.04c	SPAC23H3.05c	set1	swd1	kmt2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249220	2541776	2538762	278270	275345	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC306.04c	swd1	set1	-	kmt2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249221	2538762	2539145	275345	275717	SPCC306.04c	SPCC18.11c	set1	sdc1	kmt2	dpy30	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249222	2539145	2538762	275717	275345	SPCC18.11c	SPCC306.04c	sdc1	set1	dpy30	kmt2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249223	2538762	3361506	275345	280582	SPCC306.04c	SPAC17G8.09	set1	shg1	kmt2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249224	2538762	2539023	275345	275596	SPCC306.04c	SPCC594.05c	set1	spf1	kmt2	spp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249225	2539023	2538762	275596	275345	SPCC594.05c	SPCC306.04c	spf1	set1	spp1	kmt2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249226	2538762	2540788	275345	277307	SPCC306.04c	SPBC18H10.06c	set1	swd2	kmt2	swd2.1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249227	2540788	2538762	277307	275345	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC306.04c	swd2	set1	swd2.1	kmt2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249228	2539023	2539667	275596	276222	SPCC594.05c	SPBC13G1.08c	spf1	ash2	spp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249229	2539667	2539023	276222	275596	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC594.05c	ash2	spf1	-	spp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249230	2539023	2539023	275596	275596	SPCC594.05c	SPCC594.05c	spf1	spf1	spp1	spp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249231	2539023	2540929	275596	277445	SPCC594.05c	SPBC354.03	spf1	swd3	spp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249232	2540929	2539023	277445	275596	SPBC354.03	SPCC594.05c	swd3	spf1	-	spp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249233	2539023	2541776	275596	278270	SPCC594.05c	SPAC23H3.05c	spf1	swd1	spp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249234	2541776	2539023	278270	275596	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC594.05c	swd1	spf1	-	spp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249235	2539023	2540788	275596	277307	SPCC594.05c	SPBC18H10.06c	spf1	swd2	spp1	swd2.1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249236	2540788	2539023	277307	275596	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC594.05c	swd2	spf1	swd2.1	spp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249237	2539023	2539145	275596	275717	SPCC594.05c	SPCC18.11c	spf1	sdc1	spp1	dpy30	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249238	2539145	2539023	275717	275596	SPCC18.11c	SPCC594.05c	sdc1	spf1	dpy30	spp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249239	2539023	3361506	275596	280582	SPCC594.05c	SPAC17G8.09	spf1	shg1	spp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249240	2539667	2541299	276222	277811	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBP19A11.06	ash2	lid2	-	SPBP4H10.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249241	2541299	2539667	277811	276222	SPBP19A11.06	SPBC13G1.08c	lid2	ash2	SPBP4H10.01	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249242	2539667	2540780	276222	277299	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC83.07	ash2	jmj3	-	kdm4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249243	2539667	2539667	276222	276222	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC13G1.08c	ash2	ash2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249244	2539667	2540929	276222	277445	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC354.03	ash2	swd3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249245	2540929	2539667	277445	276222	SPBC354.03	SPBC13G1.08c	swd3	ash2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249246	2539667	2541776	276222	278270	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC23H3.05c	ash2	swd1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249247	2541776	2539667	278270	276222	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC13G1.08c	swd1	ash2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249248	2539667	2540788	276222	277307	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC18H10.06c	ash2	swd2	-	swd2.1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249249	2540788	2539667	277307	276222	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC13G1.08c	swd2	ash2	swd2.1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249250	2539667	2539145	276222	275717	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC18.11c	ash2	sdc1	-	dpy30	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249251	2539145	2539667	275717	276222	SPCC18.11c	SPBC13G1.08c	sdc1	ash2	dpy30	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249252	2539667	3361506	276222	280582	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC17G8.09	ash2	shg1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249253	2541776	2541776	278270	278270	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC23H3.05c	swd1	swd1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249254	2541776	2540929	278270	277445	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC354.03	swd1	swd3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249255	2540929	2541776	277445	278270	SPBC354.03	SPAC23H3.05c	swd3	swd1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249256	2541776	2540788	278270	277307	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC18H10.06c	swd1	swd2	-	swd2.1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249257	2540788	2541776	277307	278270	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC23H3.05c	swd2	swd1	swd2.1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249258	2541776	3361506	278270	280582	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC17G8.09	swd1	shg1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249259	2540788	2540929	277307	277445	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC354.03	swd2	swd3	swd2.1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249260	2540929	2540788	277445	277307	SPBC354.03	SPBC18H10.06c	swd3	swd2	-	swd2.1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249261	2540788	2540788	277307	277307	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC18H10.06c	swd2	swd2	swd2.1	swd2.1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249262	2540788	3361506	277307	280582	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC17G8.09	swd2	shg1	swd2.1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249263	2540929	2540929	277445	277445	SPBC354.03	SPBC354.03	swd3	swd3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249264	2540929	3361506	277445	280582	SPBC354.03	SPAC17G8.09	swd3	shg1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249265	2539145	2541299	275717	277811	SPCC18.11c	SPBP19A11.06	sdc1	lid2	dpy30	SPBP4H10.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249266	2539145	2540780	275717	277299	SPCC18.11c	SPBC83.07	sdc1	jmj3	dpy30	kdm4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249267	2539145	2543443	275717	279863	SPCC18.11c	SPAC3H1.12c	sdc1	snt2	dpy30	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249268	2539145	2540929	275717	277445	SPCC18.11c	SPBC354.03	sdc1	swd3	dpy30	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249269	2539145	2541776	275717	278270	SPCC18.11c	SPAC23H3.05c	sdc1	swd1	dpy30	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249270	2539145	2540788	275717	277307	SPCC18.11c	SPBC18H10.06c	sdc1	swd2	dpy30	swd2.1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249271	2539145	2539145	275717	275717	SPCC18.11c	SPCC18.11c	sdc1	sdc1	dpy30	dpy30	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249272	2539145	3361506	275717	280582	SPCC18.11c	SPAC17G8.09	sdc1	shg1	dpy30	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249273	2541299	2541299	277811	277811	SPBP19A11.06	SPBP19A11.06	lid2	lid2	SPBP4H10.01	SPBP4H10.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249274	2541299	2540780	277811	277299	SPBP19A11.06	SPBC83.07	lid2	jmj3	SPBP4H10.01	kdm4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249275	2541299	2543443	277811	279863	SPBP19A11.06	SPAC3H1.12c	lid2	snt2	SPBP4H10.01	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249276	2543443	2541299	279863	277811	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBP19A11.06	snt2	lid2	-	SPBP4H10.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249277	2543443	2543443	279863	279863	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC3H1.12c	snt2	snt2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249278	2543443	2540780	279863	277299	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC83.07	snt2	jmj3	-	kdm4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249279	2543443	2539667	279863	276222	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC13G1.08c	snt2	ash2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249280	2542258	2539694	278727	276248	SPAC17G6.16c	SPBC1709.08	ysh1	cft1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249281	2542258	2542258	278727	278727	SPAC17G6.16c	SPAC17G6.16c	ysh1	ysh1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249282	2542258	2539954	278727	276498	SPAC17G6.16c	SPBC1709.15c	ysh1	cft2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249283	2542258	2543538	278727	279955	SPAC17G6.16c	SPAC1071.01c	ysh1	pta1	-	SPAC4H3.15c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249284	2542258	2543089	278727	279522	SPAC17G6.16c	SPAC12G12.14c	ysh1	pfs2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249285	2542258	2541873	278727	278363	SPAC17G6.16c	SPAC22G7.10	ysh1	iss1	-	SPAC22G7.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249286	2542258	2541018	278727	277533	SPAC17G6.16c	SPBC3B9.11c	ysh1	ctf1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249287	2542258	2541193	278727	277707	SPAC17G6.16c	SPBC776.02c	ysh1	dis2	-	bws1|sds1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249288	2542258	2543452	278727	279872	SPAC17G6.16c	SPAC3G9.04	ysh1	ssu72	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249289	2542258	2541506	278727	278008	SPAC17G6.16c	SPAC227.08c	ysh1	yth1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249290	2542845	2539694	279291	276248	SPAC824.04	SPBC1709.08	SPAC824.04	cft1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249291	2542845	2539954	279291	276498	SPAC824.04	SPBC1709.15c	SPAC824.04	cft2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249292	2542845	2542258	279291	278727	SPAC824.04	SPAC17G6.16c	SPAC824.04	ysh1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249293	2542258	2542845	278727	279291	SPAC17G6.16c	SPAC824.04	ysh1	SPAC824.04	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249294	2542845	2543538	279291	279955	SPAC824.04	SPAC1071.01c	SPAC824.04	pta1	-	SPAC4H3.15c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249295	2542845	2543089	279291	279522	SPAC824.04	SPAC12G12.14c	SPAC824.04	pfs2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249296	2542845	2541873	279291	278363	SPAC824.04	SPAC22G7.10	SPAC824.04	iss1	-	SPAC22G7.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249297	2542845	2542845	279291	279291	SPAC824.04	SPAC824.04	SPAC824.04	SPAC824.04	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249298	2542845	2541018	279291	277533	SPAC824.04	SPBC3B9.11c	SPAC824.04	ctf1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249299	2542845	2541193	279291	277707	SPAC824.04	SPBC776.02c	SPAC824.04	dis2	-	bws1|sds1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249300	2542845	2543452	279291	279872	SPAC824.04	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC824.04	ssu72	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249301	2542845	2541506	279291	278008	SPAC824.04	SPAC227.08c	SPAC824.04	yth1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roguev A (2004)	14617822	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249302	2542737	2540494	279187	277022	SPAC25B8.14	SPBC409.04c	mal2	mis12	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Jin QW (2002)	12242294	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249303	2540027	2539869	276571	276415	SPBC1734.14c	SPBC11B10.09	suc1	cdc2	p13	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Brizuela L (1987)	3322810	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249304	2542002	2542486	278486	278945	SPAC2G11.08c	SPAC19B12.12c	smn1	yip11	yab8	yip1|yip1-a	Two-hybrid	physical	Hannus S (2000)	10749973	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249305	2542002	2542486	278486	278945	SPAC2G11.08c	SPAC19B12.12c	smn1	yip11	yab8	yip1|yip1-a	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Hannus S (2000)	10749973	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249306	2542002	2542002	278486	278486	SPAC2G11.08c	SPAC2G11.08c	smn1	smn1	yab8	yab8	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Hannus S (2000)	10749973	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249307	2541178	2541209	277692	277723	SPBC725.02	SPBC887.10	mpr1	mcs4	spy1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nguyen AN (2000)	10749922	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249308	2542761	2540660	279211	277185	SPAC1565.06c	SPBC21.06c	spg1	cdc7	sid3	its10|pld1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Schmidt S (1997)	9203579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249309	2542761	2540660	279211	277185	SPAC1565.06c	SPBC21.06c	spg1	cdc7	sid3	its10|pld1	Two-hybrid	physical	Schmidt S (1997)	9203579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249310	2540013	2540880	276557	277397	SPBC14C8.07c	SPBC582.03	cdc18	cdc13	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Brown GW (1997)	9177184	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249311	2540013	2543481	276557	279901	SPBC14C8.07c	SPAPB2B4.03	cdc18	cig2	-	cyc17	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Brown GW (1997)	9177184	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249312	2539869	2540237	276415	276769	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC32F12.06	cdc2	pch1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Furnari BA (1997)	9115279	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249313	2540237	2539869	276769	276415	SPBC32F12.06	SPBC11B10.09	pch1	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Furnari BA (1997)	9115279	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249314	2541635	2542757	278131	279207	SPAC1556.01c	SPAC13C5.07	rad50	mre11	SPAP4C9.01c	rad32	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tomita K (2003)	12861005	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249315	2541652	2541293	278148	277805	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC9B6.10	sty1	cdc37	phh1|spc1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tatebe H (2003)	12861001	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249316	2540258	3361261	276789	280337	SPBC32C12.02	SPBC23G7.17c	ste11	mat1-Mi	aff1|stex	mat3-m|mat1|matmi|matmi_2|mat1-Mm|matMm	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kjaerulff S (1997)	9233811	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249319	2542299	2543402	278766	279824	SPAC18B11.10	SPAC630.14c	tup11	tup12	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Greenall A (2002)	12221110	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249320	2543402	2542299	279824	278766	SPAC630.14c	SPAC18B11.10	tup12	tup11	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Greenall A (2002)	12221110	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249321	2542761	2539149	279211	275721	SPAC1565.06c	SPCC1739.11c	spg1	cdc11	sid3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Morrell JL (2004)	15062098	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249322	2542162	2539149	278638	275721	SPAC6F6.08c	SPCC1739.11c	cdc16	cdc11	bub2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Morrell JL (2004)	15062098	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249323	2542761	2539149	279211	275721	SPAC1565.06c	SPCC1739.11c	spg1	cdc11	sid3	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Morrell JL (2004)	15062098	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249324	2542162	2539149	278638	275721	SPAC6F6.08c	SPCC1739.11c	cdc16	cdc11	bub2	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Morrell JL (2004)	15062098	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249325	2541599	2539149	278096	275721	SPAC24B11.11c	SPCC1739.11c	sid2	cdc11	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Morrell JL (2004)	15062098	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249326	2541599	2539149	278096	275721	SPAC24B11.11c	SPCC1739.11c	sid2	cdc11	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Morrell JL (2004)	15062098	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249327	2541599	2539149	278096	275721	SPAC24B11.11c	SPCC1739.11c	sid2	cdc11	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Morrell JL (2004)	15062098	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249328	2541599	2539149	278096	275721	SPAC24B11.11c	SPCC1739.11c	sid2	cdc11	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Morrell JL (2004)	15062098	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249329	2541599	2540845	278096	277362	SPAC24B11.11c	SPBC428.13c	sid2	mob1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Morrell JL (2004)	15062098	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249330	2541957	2540650	278444	277175	SPAC23C11.16	SPBC244.01c	plo1	sid4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Morrell JL (2004)	15062098	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249331	2541957	2540650	278444	277175	SPAC23C11.16	SPBC244.01c	plo1	sid4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Morrell JL (2004)	15062098	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249332	2540650	2541957	277175	278444	SPBC244.01c	SPAC23C11.16	sid4	plo1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Morrell JL (2004)	15062098	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249333	2540880	2539149	277397	275721	SPBC582.03	SPCC1739.11c	cdc13	cdc11	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Morrell JL (2004)	15062098	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249334	2539149	2540880	275721	277397	SPCC1739.11c	SPBC582.03	cdc11	cdc13	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Morrell JL (2004)	15062098	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249335	2539149	2539869	275721	276415	SPCC1739.11c	SPBC11B10.09	cdc11	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Morrell JL (2004)	15062098	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249336	2539149	2540880	275721	277397	SPCC1739.11c	SPBC582.03	cdc11	cdc13	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Morrell JL (2004)	15062098	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249337	2541599	2541599	278096	278096	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC24B11.11c	sid2	sid2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Hou MC (2004)	15060149	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249338	2541599	2541599	278096	278096	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC24B11.11c	sid2	sid2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hou MC (2004)	15060149	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249339	2540392	2539309	276920	275876	SPBC365.15	SPCC4G3.19	alp4	alp16	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Venkatram S (2004)	15004232	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249340	2540392	2540223	276920	276756	SPBC365.15	SPBC32F12.04	alp4	gtb1	-	tug1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Venkatram S (2004)	15004232	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249341	2540392	2539467	276920	276030	SPBC365.15	SPCC417.07c	alp4	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Venkatram S (2004)	15004232	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249342	2540392	2540667	276920	277192	SPBC365.15	SPBC211.06	alp4	gfh1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Venkatram S (2004)	15004232	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249343	2540690	2540392	277215	276920	SPBC428.20c	SPBC365.15	alp6	alp4	SPBC902.01c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Venkatram S (2004)	15004232	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249344	2540690	2540690	277215	277215	SPBC428.20c	SPBC428.20c	alp6	alp6	SPBC902.01c	SPBC902.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Venkatram S (2004)	15004232	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249345	2540690	2539309	277215	275876	SPBC428.20c	SPCC4G3.19	alp6	alp16	SPBC902.01c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Venkatram S (2004)	15004232	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249346	2540690	2539467	277215	276030	SPBC428.20c	SPCC417.07c	alp6	mto1	SPBC902.01c	mbo1|mod20	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Venkatram S (2004)	15004232	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249347	2540690	2540667	277215	277192	SPBC428.20c	SPBC211.06	alp6	gfh1	SPBC902.01c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Venkatram S (2004)	15004232	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249348	2540690	2540223	277215	276756	SPBC428.20c	SPBC32F12.04	alp6	gtb1	SPBC902.01c	tug1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Venkatram S (2004)	15004232	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249349	2540392	2540667	276920	277192	SPBC365.15	SPBC211.06	alp4	gfh1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Venkatram S (2004)	15004232	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249350	2540667	2540392	277192	276920	SPBC211.06	SPBC365.15	gfh1	alp4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Venkatram S (2004)	15004232	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249351	2540690	2540667	277215	277192	SPBC428.20c	SPBC211.06	alp6	gfh1	SPBC902.01c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Venkatram S (2004)	15004232	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249352	2540667	2540690	277192	277215	SPBC211.06	SPBC428.20c	gfh1	alp6	-	SPBC902.01c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Venkatram S (2004)	15004232	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249353	2540667	2540223	277192	276756	SPBC211.06	SPBC32F12.04	gfh1	gtb1	-	tug1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Venkatram S (2004)	15004232	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249354	2540392	2539467	276920	276030	SPBC365.15	SPCC417.07c	alp4	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Venkatram S (2004)	15004232	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249355	2539467	2540392	276030	276920	SPCC417.07c	SPBC365.15	mto1	alp4	mbo1|mod20	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Venkatram S (2004)	15004232	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249356	2540690	2539467	277215	276030	SPBC428.20c	SPCC417.07c	alp6	mto1	SPBC902.01c	mbo1|mod20	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Venkatram S (2004)	15004232	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249357	2539467	2540690	276030	277215	SPCC417.07c	SPBC428.20c	mto1	alp6	mbo1|mod20	SPBC902.01c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Venkatram S (2004)	15004232	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249358	2540392	2541455	276920	277958	SPBC365.15	SPAC6G9.06c	alp4	pcp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Venkatram S (2004)	15004232	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249359	2540845	2543039	277362	279474	SPBC428.13c	SPAC3A12.14	mob1	cam1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Venkatram S (2004)	15004232	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249360	2541455	2543039	277958	279474	SPAC6G9.06c	SPAC3A12.14	pcp1	cam1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Venkatram S (2004)	15004232	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249361	2540392	2540690	276920	277215	SPBC365.15	SPBC428.20c	alp4	alp6	-	SPBC902.01c	Co-localization	physical	Venkatram S (2004)	15004232	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249362	2539467	2540392	276030	276920	SPCC417.07c	SPBC365.15	mto1	alp4	mbo1|mod20	-	Co-localization	physical	Venkatram S (2004)	15004232	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249363	2540392	2539467	276920	276030	SPBC365.15	SPCC417.07c	alp4	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Co-localization	physical	Venkatram S (2004)	15004232	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249364	2539467	2540690	276030	277215	SPCC417.07c	SPBC428.20c	mto1	alp6	mbo1|mod20	SPBC902.01c	Co-localization	physical	Venkatram S (2004)	15004232	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249365	2539467	2539309	276030	275876	SPCC417.07c	SPCC4G3.19	mto1	alp16	mbo1|mod20	-	Co-localization	physical	Venkatram S (2004)	15004232	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249366	2539467	2540667	276030	277192	SPCC417.07c	SPBC211.06	mto1	gfh1	mbo1|mod20	-	Co-localization	physical	Venkatram S (2004)	15004232	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249367	2540392	2539309	276920	275876	SPBC365.15	SPCC4G3.19	alp4	alp16	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Venkatram S (2004)	15004232	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249368	2540392	2540667	276920	277192	SPBC365.15	SPBC211.06	alp4	gfh1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Venkatram S (2004)	15004232	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249369	2541208	2542744	277722	279194	SPBC887.04c	SPAC1565.08	lub1	cdc48	-	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ogiso Y (2004)	14993272	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249370	2538720	2542925	275304	279366	SPCC338.05c	SPAC11E3.04c	mms2	ubc13	spm2	spu13|sst5	Two-hybrid	physical	Brown M (2002)	12531016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249371	2542925	2538720	279366	275304	SPAC11E3.04c	SPCC338.05c	ubc13	mms2	spu13|sst5	spm2	Two-hybrid	physical	Brown M (2002)	12531016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249372	2542635	2543027	279089	279463	SPAC24H6.09	SPAC110.03	gef1	cdc42	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Coll PM (2003)	12529446	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249373	2543027	2542635	279463	279089	SPAC110.03	SPAC24H6.09	cdc42	gef1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Coll PM (2003)	12529446	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249374	2543027	2542635	279463	279089	SPAC110.03	SPAC24H6.09	cdc42	gef1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Coll PM (2003)	12529446	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	No Modification	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249375	2540018	2540368	276562	276897	SPBC12C2.10c	SPBC36.05c	pst1	clr6	SPBC21D10.01c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Silverstein RA (2003)	12526748	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249376	2540368	2540018	276897	276562	SPBC36.05c	SPBC12C2.10c	clr6	pst1	-	SPBC21D10.01c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Silverstein RA (2003)	12526748	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249377	2542880	2541957	279325	278444	SPAC6F12.14	SPAC23C11.16	cut23	plo1	apc8	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	May KM (2002)	11777938	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249378	2542880	2541957	279325	278444	SPAC6F12.14	SPAC23C11.16	cut23	plo1	apc8	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	May KM (2002)	11777938	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249379	2538787	2540959	275368	277475	SPCC364.02c	SPBC365.12c	bis1	ish1	-	isp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Taricani L (2002)	11751918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249380	2538787	2542427	275368	278889	SPCC364.02c	SPAC6F6.12	bis1	SPAC6F6.12	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2002)	11751918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249381	2538787	2543671	275368	280085	SPCC364.02c	SPAC644.04	bis1	pct1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2002)	11751918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249382	2538787	2543298	275368	279723	SPCC364.02c	SPAC6B12.15	bis1	cpc2	-	rkp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2002)	11751918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249383	2538787	2540784	275368	277303	SPCC364.02c	SPBC211.04c	bis1	mcm6	-	mis5	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2002)	11751918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249384	2538787	2540099	275368	276637	SPCC364.02c	SPBC16H5.11c	bis1	skb1	-	rmt5	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2002)	11751918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249385	2538787	2541807	275368	278298	SPCC364.02c	SPAC23G3.11	bis1	rpn6	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2002)	11751918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249386	2538787	2543451	275368	279871	SPCC364.02c	SPAC3G9.10c	bis1	rrp41	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2002)	11751918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249387	2538787	2539971	275368	276515	SPCC364.02c	SPBC1105.04c	bis1	cbp1	-	abp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2002)	11751918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249388	2538787	2540212	275368	276745	SPCC364.02c	SPBC9B6.05c	bis1	lsm3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2002)	11751918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249389	2538787	2538843	275368	275424	SPCC364.02c	SPCC162.08c	bis1	nup211	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2002)	11751918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249390	2538787	2539928	275368	276472	SPCC364.02c	SPBC1604.08c	bis1	imp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2002)	11751918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249391	2538787	2542465	275368	278926	SPCC364.02c	SPAC19G12.10c	bis1	cpy1	-	pcy1	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2002)	11751918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249392	2538787	2539863	275368	276410	SPCC364.02c	SPBC14F5.03c	bis1	kap123	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2002)	11751918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249393	2538787	2542004	275368	278487	SPCC364.02c	SPAC27F1.04c	bis1	nuf2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2002)	11751918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249394	2538787	2539987	275368	276531	SPCC364.02c	SPBC1604.06c	bis1	SPBC1604.06c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2002)	11751918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249395	2538787	2541211	275368	277725	SPCC364.02c	SPBC839.10	bis1	usp107	-	snu71	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2002)	11751918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249396	2538787	2539930	275368	276474	SPCC364.02c	SPBC1198.11c	bis1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2002)	11751918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249397	2538787	2541869	275368	278359	SPCC364.02c	SPAC22F3.13	bis1	tsc1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2002)	11751918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249398	2538787	2539214	275368	275784	SPCC364.02c	SPCC1672.10	bis1	mis16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2002)	11751918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249399	2538787	2540753	275368	277274	SPCC364.02c	SPBC211.02c	bis1	cwf3	-	syf1	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2002)	11751918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249400	2538787	2541580	275368	278077	SPCC364.02c	SPAC1687.05	bis1	pli1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2002)	11751918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249401	2540959	2540959	277475	277475	SPBC365.12c	SPBC365.12c	ish1	ish1	isp1	isp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2002)	11751918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249402	2540959	2538787	277475	275368	SPBC365.12c	SPCC364.02c	ish1	bis1	isp1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2002)	11751918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249403	2540959	2543581	277475	279996	SPBC365.12c	SPAPB1E7.12	ish1	rps602	isp1	rps6|rps6-2	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2002)	11751918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249404	2543686	2539523	280100	276085	SPAC3C7.14c	SPCC622.09	obr1	htb1	apt1|uhp1|p25	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Naresh A (2003)	12511578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249405	2540917	2539324	277433	275890	SPBC409.05	SPCC18.04	skp1	pof6	psh1|sph1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Hermand D (2003)	12511573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249406	2540044	2540745	276582	277268	SPBC1778.04	SPBC21C3.18	spo6	spo4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Nakamura T (2002)	11739743	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249407	2540745	2540044	277268	276582	SPBC21C3.18	SPBC1778.04	spo4	spo6	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nakamura T (2002)	11739743	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249408	2541612	2541022	278109	277537	SPAC1F7.04	SPBC3F6.05	rho1	rga1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Nakano K (2001)	11737264	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249409	2541835	2539310	278326	275877	SPAC22E12.08	SPCC285.17	rrn10	spp27	-	uaf30	Two-hybrid	physical	Liu M (2002)	12490702	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249412	2542409	2540650	278873	277175	SPAC17G8.10c	SPBC244.01c	dma1	sid4	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Guertin DA (2002)	12479804	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249413	2542409	2541957	278873	278444	SPAC17G8.10c	SPAC23C11.16	dma1	plo1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Guertin DA (2002)	12479804	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249414	2542615	2539639	279069	276194	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBC106.09	cut20	cut4	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	apc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249415	2542615	3361204	279069	280280	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBP23A10.04	cut20	apc2	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249416	2542615	2542438	279069	278900	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC17C9.01c	cut20	nuc2	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	SPAC1851.01|apc3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249417	2542615	2543355	279069	279777	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC959.09c	cut20	apc5	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	SPAP32A8.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249418	2542615	2541592	279069	278089	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC6F12.15c	cut20	cut9	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	dre1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249419	2542615	2542880	279069	279325	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC6F12.14	cut20	cut23	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	apc8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249420	2542615	2540307	279069	276837	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBC1A4.01	cut20	apc10	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	SPBC1E8.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249421	2542615	2543187	279069	279616	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC343.03	cut20	apc11	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249422	2542615	2542045	279069	278526	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC23C11.12	cut20	hcn1	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249423	2542615	2540285	279069	276816	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBC28E12.01c	cut20	apc13	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	SPBC9B6.12c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249424	2540285	2542615	276816	279069	SPBC28E12.01c	SPAC19G12.01c	apc13	cut20	SPBC9B6.12c	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249425	2542615	2542211	279069	278685	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC27D7.05c	cut20	apc14	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	omt1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249426	2542615	2540655	279069	277180	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBC83.04	cut20	apc15	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249427	2540285	2539639	276816	276194	SPBC28E12.01c	SPBC106.09	apc13	cut4	SPBC9B6.12c	apc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249428	2540285	3361204	276816	280280	SPBC28E12.01c	SPBP23A10.04	apc13	apc2	SPBC9B6.12c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249429	2540285	2542438	276816	278900	SPBC28E12.01c	SPAC17C9.01c	apc13	nuc2	SPBC9B6.12c	SPAC1851.01|apc3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249430	2540285	2543355	276816	279777	SPBC28E12.01c	SPAC959.09c	apc13	apc5	SPBC9B6.12c	SPAP32A8.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249431	2540285	2541592	276816	278089	SPBC28E12.01c	SPAC6F12.15c	apc13	cut9	SPBC9B6.12c	dre1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249432	2540285	2542880	276816	279325	SPBC28E12.01c	SPAC6F12.14	apc13	cut23	SPBC9B6.12c	apc8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249433	2540285	2540307	276816	276837	SPBC28E12.01c	SPBC1A4.01	apc13	apc10	SPBC9B6.12c	SPBC1E8.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249434	2540285	2543187	276816	279616	SPBC28E12.01c	SPAC343.03	apc13	apc11	SPBC9B6.12c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249435	2540285	2542045	276816	278526	SPBC28E12.01c	SPAC23C11.12	apc13	hcn1	SPBC9B6.12c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249436	2540285	2542211	276816	278685	SPBC28E12.01c	SPAC27D7.05c	apc13	apc14	SPBC9B6.12c	omt1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249437	2540285	2540655	276816	277180	SPBC28E12.01c	SPBC83.04	apc13	apc15	SPBC9B6.12c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249438	2542615	2540285	279069	276816	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBC28E12.01c	cut20	apc13	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	SPBC9B6.12c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249439	2540285	2542615	276816	279069	SPBC28E12.01c	SPAC19G12.01c	apc13	cut20	SPBC9B6.12c	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249440	2541592	2542211	278089	278685	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC27D7.05c	cut9	apc14	dre1	omt1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249441	2542211	2541592	278685	278089	SPAC27D7.05c	SPAC6F12.15c	apc14	cut9	omt1	dre1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249442	2541592	2540655	278089	277180	SPAC6F12.15c	SPBC83.04	cut9	apc15	dre1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249443	2540655	2541592	277180	278089	SPBC83.04	SPAC6F12.15c	apc15	cut9	-	dre1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249444	2540285	2540655	276816	277180	SPBC28E12.01c	SPBC83.04	apc13	apc15	SPBC9B6.12c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249445	2540655	2540285	277180	276816	SPBC83.04	SPBC28E12.01c	apc15	apc13	-	SPBC9B6.12c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249446	2540655	2542211	277180	278685	SPBC83.04	SPAC27D7.05c	apc15	apc14	-	omt1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249447	2542211	2540655	278685	277180	SPAC27D7.05c	SPBC83.04	apc14	apc15	omt1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yoon HJ (2002)	12477395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249448	2543671	2540239	280085	276771	SPAC644.04	SPBC32H8.10	pct1	cdk9	-	SPACTOKYO_453.22	Two-hybrid	physical	Pei Y (2003)	12475973	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249449	2543671	2540239	280085	276771	SPAC644.04	SPBC32H8.10	pct1	cdk9	-	SPACTOKYO_453.22	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Pei Y (2003)	12475973	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249450	2540239	2540237	276771	276769	SPBC32H8.10	SPBC32F12.06	cdk9	pch1	SPACTOKYO_453.22	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Pei Y (2003)	12475973	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249451	2541726	2542337	278220	278803	SPAC22H10.07	SPAC16E8.09	scd2	scd1	ral3	ral1	Two-hybrid	physical	Chang EC (1994)	7923372	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249452	2541726	2543027	278220	279463	SPAC22H10.07	SPAC110.03	scd2	cdc42	ral3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Chang EC (1994)	7923372	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249453	2541592	2542824	278089	279271	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC144.13c	cut9	srw1	dre1	ste9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Blanco MA (2000)	10921876	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249454	2540246	2540424	276778	276952	SPBC336.07	SPBC21H7.05	sfc3	sfc6	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Huang Y (2000)	10906331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249455	2540246	2542856	276778	279302	SPBC336.07	SPAC6F12.11c	sfc3	sfc1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Huang Y (2000)	10906331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249456	2540246	2539187	276778	275758	SPBC336.07	SPCC16C4.14c	sfc3	sfc4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Huang Y (2000)	10906331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249457	2540424	2539187	276952	275758	SPBC21H7.05	SPCC16C4.14c	sfc6	sfc4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Huang Y (2000)	10906331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249458	2540424	2542856	276952	279302	SPBC21H7.05	SPAC6F12.11c	sfc6	sfc1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Huang Y (2000)	10906331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249459	2540148	2543407	276685	279829	SPBC16D10.04c	SPAC8F11.07c	dna2	cdc24	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Kang HY (2000)	10880469	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249460	2540148	2542083	276685	278560	SPBC16D10.04c	SPAC27E2.05	dna2	cdc1	-	mis1	Two-hybrid	physical	Kang HY (2000)	10880469	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249461	2540148	2543164	276685	279595	SPBC16D10.04c	SPAC3G6.06c	dna2	rad2	-	fen1	Two-hybrid	physical	Kang HY (2000)	10880469	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249462	2542467	2541633	278928	278129	SPAC1834.04	SPAC664.01c	hht1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Co-localization	physical	Hall IM (2002)	12215653	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249463	2542393	2540129	278857	276666	SPAC17G6.12	SPBC12D12.08c	cul1	ned8	pcu1	SPBC24C6.01c|nedd8|ubl1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Osaka F (2000)	10880460	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249464	2540511	2542393	277039	278857	SPBC1718.01	SPAC17G6.12	pop1	cul1	SPBC2G2.18|ste16	pcu1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Osaka F (2000)	10880460	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249465	2540956	2541268	277472	277782	SPBC409.06	SPBP19A11.03c	uch2	mts4	-	rpn1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Li T (2000)	10872838	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249466	2541652	2542972	278148	279411	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAPYUG7.02c	sty1	sin1	phh1|spc1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wilkinson MG (1999)	10428959	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249467	3361260	2543583	280336	279998	SPBP22H7.07	SPAC644.12	prp5	cdc5	cwf1|pi024|SPACTOKYO_453.10	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	McDonald WH (1999)	10409726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249468	2542531	2543583	278989	279998	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC644.12	cwf2	cdc5	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	McDonald WH (1999)	10409726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249469	2540753	2543583	277274	279998	SPBC211.02c	SPAC644.12	cwf3	cdc5	syf1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	McDonald WH (1999)	10409726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249470	2540328	2543583	276858	279998	SPBC31F10.11c	SPAC644.12	cwf4	cdc5	syf3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	McDonald WH (1999)	10409726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249471	2540711	2543583	277234	279998	SPBC215.12	SPAC644.12	cwf10	cdc5	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	McDonald WH (1999)	10409726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249474	2540043	2542615	276581	279069	SPBC1198.12	SPAC19G12.01c	mfr1	cut20	SPBC660.02|fzr1	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Blanco MA (2001)	11493649	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249475	2542262	2541720	278731	278214	SPAC17C9.10	SPAC23H3.13c	stm1	gpa2	-	git8	Two-hybrid	physical	Chung KS (2001)	11461899	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249476	2542262	2541720	278731	278214	SPAC17C9.10	SPAC23H3.13c	stm1	gpa2	-	git8	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chung KS (2001)	11461899	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249477	2541468	2542175	277970	278650	SPAC1F5.09c	SPAC1F3.02c	shk2	mkh1	pak2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Merla A (2001)	11453249	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249478	3361511	2539487	280587	276050	SPAC23C4.08	SPCC895.05	rho3	for3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Nakano K (2002)	12415007	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249479	2543027	2539487	279463	276050	SPAC110.03	SPCC895.05	cdc42	for3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Nakano K (2002)	12415007	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249481	2539513	2541699	276075	278195	SPCC645.05c	SPAP8A3.08	myo2	cdc4	rng5	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Naqvi NI (1999)	10022828	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249482	2541699	2539513	278195	276075	SPAP8A3.08	SPCC645.05c	cdc4	myo2	-	rng5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Naqvi NI (1999)	10022828	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249483	2543514	2540511	279932	277039	SPAC4D7.03	SPBC1718.01	pop2	pop1	sud1	SPBC2G2.18|ste16	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kominami K (1998)	9990507	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249484	2540511	2543514	277039	279932	SPBC1718.01	SPAC4D7.03	pop1	pop2	SPBC2G2.18|ste16	sud1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kominami K (1998)	9990507	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249485	2543514	2543514	279932	279932	SPAC4D7.03	SPAC4D7.03	pop2	pop2	sud1	sud1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kominami K (1998)	9990507	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249486	2543514	2542393	279932	278857	SPAC4D7.03	SPAC17G6.12	pop2	cul1	sud1	pcu1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kominami K (1998)	9990507	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249487	2540511	2540511	277039	277039	SPBC1718.01	SPBC1718.01	pop1	pop1	SPBC2G2.18|ste16	SPBC2G2.18|ste16	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kominami K (1998)	9990507	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249488	2543666	2539123	280080	275695	SPAC644.06c	SPCC18B5.03	cdr1	wee1	nim1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Pelloquin L (1999)	9928955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249489	2543666	2539844	280080	276392	SPAC644.06c	SPBC1718.06	cdr1	msp1	nim1	mgm1	Two-hybrid	physical	Pelloquin L (1999)	9928955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249490	2539844	2543666	276392	280080	SPBC1718.06	SPAC644.06c	msp1	cdr1	mgm1	nim1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Pelloquin L (1999)	9928955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249491	2543666	2539844	280080	276392	SPAC644.06c	SPBC1718.06	cdr1	msp1	nim1	mgm1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Pelloquin L (1999)	9928955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249492	2542632	2542029	279086	278511	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC8E11.02c	cdc25	rad24	sal2	anr5|sam4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lopez-Girona A (1999)	9923681	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249493	2542677	2541652	279130	278148	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC24B11.06c	pyp1	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nguyen AN (1999)	10398679	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249494	2541220	2541633	277734	278129	SPBC8D2.04	SPAC664.01c	hht2	swi6	h3.2	SPAC824.10c	Co-localization	physical	Hall IM (2002)	12215653	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249495	2539804	2541633	276354	278129	SPBC1105.11c	SPAC664.01c	hht3	swi6	h3.3	SPAC824.10c	Co-localization	physical	Hall IM (2002)	12215653	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249496	2540020	2540020	276564	276564	SPBC16D10.09	SPBC16D10.09	pcn1	pcn1	pcn	pcn	Two-hybrid	physical	Reynolds N (2000)	10698951	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249497	2540020	2539627	276564	276184	SPBC16D10.09	SPBC1734.02c	pcn1	cdc27	pcn	SPBC337.18c	Two-hybrid	physical	Reynolds N (2000)	10698951	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249498	2539627	2540020	276184	276564	SPBC1734.02c	SPBC16D10.09	cdc27	pcn1	SPBC337.18c	pcn	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Reynolds N (2000)	10698951	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249499	2540020	2539627	276564	276184	SPBC16D10.09	SPBC1734.02c	pcn1	cdc27	pcn	SPBC337.18c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Reynolds N (2000)	10698951	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249500	2540020	2542083	276564	278560	SPBC16D10.09	SPAC27E2.05	pcn1	cdc1	pcn	mis1	Two-hybrid	physical	Reynolds N (2000)	10698951	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249501	2542083	2539627	278560	276184	SPAC27E2.05	SPBC1734.02c	cdc1	cdc27	mis1	SPBC337.18c	Two-hybrid	physical	Reynolds N (2000)	10698951	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249502	2542083	2539627	278560	276184	SPAC27E2.05	SPBC1734.02c	cdc1	cdc27	mis1	SPBC337.18c	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Reynolds N (2000)	10698951	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249503	2542293	2541612	278761	278109	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC1F7.04	pck1	rho1	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Sayers LG (2000)	10651902	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249504	2539649	2541612	276204	278109	SPBC12D12.04c	SPAC1F7.04	pck2	rho1	pkc1|sts6	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Sayers LG (2000)	10651902	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249505	2538816	2540292	275397	276823	SPCC1442.10c	SPBC28F2.12	rpb3	rpb1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kimura M (2000)	10648788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249506	2540292	2538816	276823	275397	SPBC28F2.12	SPCC1442.10c	rpb1	rpb3	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kimura M (2000)	10648788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249507	2538816	2541446	275397	277951	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC23G3.01	rpb3	rpb2	-	SPAC521.06	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kimura M (2000)	10648788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249508	2538816	2541011	275397	277526	SPCC1442.10c	SPBC337.14	rpb3	rpb4	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kimura M (2000)	10648788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249509	2538816	2541910	275397	278400	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC23C4.15	rpb3	rpb5	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kimura M (2000)	10648788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249510	2538816	2539083	275397	275655	SPCC1442.10c	SPCC1020.04c	rpb3	rpb6	-	rpo15	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kimura M (2000)	10648788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249511	2538816	2542097	275397	278573	SPCC1442.10c	SPACUNK4.06c	rpb3	rpb7	-	SPAPYUK71.02	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kimura M (2000)	10648788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249512	2538816	2539794	275397	276344	SPCC1442.10c	SPBC14C8.12	rpb3	rpb8	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kimura M (2000)	10648788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249513	2538816	2541470	275397	277972	SPCC1442.10c	SPAPYUG7.04c	rpb3	rpb9	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kimura M (2000)	10648788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249514	2538816	2542233	275397	278705	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC1B3.12c	rpb3	rpb10	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kimura M (2000)	10648788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249515	2538816	2543112	275397	279544	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC3A12.07	rpb3	rpb11	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kimura M (2000)	10648788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249516	2538816	2540793	275397	277312	SPCC1442.10c	SPBC19C2.03	rpb3	rpc10	-	rpb12	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kimura M (2000)	10648788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249517	2540292	2541446	276823	277951	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC23G3.01	rpb1	rpb2	-	SPAC521.06	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kimura M (2000)	10648788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249518	2540292	2541910	276823	278400	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC23C4.15	rpb1	rpb5	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kimura M (2000)	10648788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249519	2540292	2542097	276823	278573	SPBC28F2.12	SPACUNK4.06c	rpb1	rpb7	-	SPAPYUK71.02	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kimura M (2000)	10648788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249520	2540292	2539794	276823	276344	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC14C8.12	rpb1	rpb8	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kimura M (2000)	10648788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249521	2540292	2543112	276823	279544	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC3A12.07	rpb1	rpb11	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kimura M (2000)	10648788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249522	2541643	2542558	278139	279014	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC1952.07	rad17	rad1	-	rad19	Two-hybrid	physical	Caspari T (2000)	10648611	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249523	2542558	2541643	279014	278139	SPAC1952.07	SPAC14C4.13	rad1	rad17	rad19	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Caspari T (2000)	10648611	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249524	2542080	2542404	278557	278868	SPAC27D7.03c	SPAC57A7.11	mei2	mip1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Shinozaki-Yabana S (2000)	10648609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249525	2542404	2542080	278868	278557	SPAC57A7.11	SPAC27D7.03c	mip1	mei2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Shinozaki-Yabana S (2000)	10648609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249526	2542404	2540258	278868	276789	SPAC57A7.11	SPBC32C12.02	mip1	ste11	-	aff1|stex	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Shinozaki-Yabana S (2000)	10648609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249527	2541649	2539914	278145	276458	SPAC1F3.06c	SPBC12D12.01	spo15	sad1	-	SPBC16H5.01c	Co-localization	physical	Ikemoto S (2000)	10639340	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249528	2542799	2539663	279247	276218	SPAC1687.01	SPBC1289.07c	rpc19	rpc40	SPAPYUL23.01|rpa17	rpa42	Two-hybrid	physical	Imazawa Y (1999)	10628857	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249529	2543537	2541089	279954	277604	SPAC4D7.05	SPBC646.09c	sum1	int6	tif34	yin6	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dunand-Sauthier I (2002)	12006658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249530	2543537	2541268	279954	277782	SPAC4D7.05	SPBP19A11.03c	sum1	mts4	tif34	rpn1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dunand-Sauthier I (2002)	12006658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249531	2542628	2542266	279082	278735	SPAC24H6.06	SPAC17D4.02	sld3	cdc45	mug175	goa1|sna41	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nakajima R (2002)	12006645	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249532	2542266	2542628	278735	279082	SPAC17D4.02	SPAC24H6.06	cdc45	sld3	goa1|sna41	mug175	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nakajima R (2002)	12006645	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249533	2539164	2540620	275735	277146	SPCC16A11.17	SPBC4.04c	mcm4	mcm2	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	cdc19|nda1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gomez EB (2002)	11973289	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249534	2539164	2542477	275735	278937	SPCC16A11.17	SPAC1B2.05	mcm4	mcm5	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gomez EB (2002)	11973289	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249535	2539164	2540784	275735	277303	SPCC16A11.17	SPBC211.04c	mcm4	mcm6	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	mis5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gomez EB (2002)	11973289	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249536	2539164	2540630	275735	277156	SPCC16A11.17	SPBC25D12.03c	mcm4	mcm7	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gomez EB (2002)	11973289	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249537	2539164	2538838	275735	275419	SPCC16A11.17	SPCC1682.02c	mcm4	mcm3	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gomez EB (2002)	11973289	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249538	2539353	2539133	275919	275705	SPCC5E4.03c	SPCC16C4.18c	taf5	taf6	taf72	taf50	Two-hybrid	physical	Mitsuzawa H (2002)	11972332	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249539	2539133	2539353	275705	275919	SPCC16C4.18c	SPCC5E4.03c	taf6	taf5	taf50	taf72	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Mitsuzawa H (2002)	11972332	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249540	2539882	2539133	276428	275705	SPBC15D4.14	SPCC16C4.18c	taf73	taf6	taf5|taf5l	taf50	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mitsuzawa H (2002)	11972332	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249541	2539882	2542822	276428	279269	SPBC15D4.14	SPAC13F5.02c	taf73	ptr6	taf5|taf5l	taf7	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mitsuzawa H (2002)	11972332	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249542	2539882	2542822	276428	279269	SPBC15D4.14	SPAC13F5.02c	taf73	ptr6	taf5|taf5l	taf7	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mitsuzawa H (2001)	11279037	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249543	2539882	2541848	276428	278339	SPBC15D4.14	SPAC2G11.14	taf73	taf111	taf5|taf5l	kat4|taf1|taf130	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mitsuzawa H (2002)	11972332	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249544	2539882	2541848	276428	278339	SPBC15D4.14	SPAC2G11.14	taf73	taf111	taf5|taf5l	kat4|taf1|taf130	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mitsuzawa H (2001)	11279037	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249545	2539882	2541582	276428	278079	SPBC15D4.14	SPAC29E6.08	taf73	tbp1	taf5|taf5l	SPAC30.12|tbp|tdf1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mitsuzawa H (2002)	11972332	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249546	2539882	2541582	276428	278079	SPBC15D4.14	SPAC29E6.08	taf73	tbp1	taf5|taf5l	SPAC30.12|tbp|tdf1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mitsuzawa H (2001)	11279037	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249547	2539353	2541848	275919	278339	SPCC5E4.03c	SPAC2G11.14	taf5	taf111	taf72	kat4|taf1|taf130	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mitsuzawa H (2002)	11972332	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249548	2539353	2541848	275919	278339	SPCC5E4.03c	SPAC2G11.14	taf5	taf111	taf72	kat4|taf1|taf130	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mitsuzawa H (2001)	11279037	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249549	2539353	2541582	275919	278079	SPCC5E4.03c	SPAC29E6.08	taf5	tbp1	taf72	SPAC30.12|tbp|tdf1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mitsuzawa H (2002)	11972332	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249550	2539353	2541582	275919	278079	SPCC5E4.03c	SPAC29E6.08	taf5	tbp1	taf72	SPAC30.12|tbp|tdf1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mitsuzawa H (2001)	11279037	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249551	2539353	2542822	275919	279269	SPCC5E4.03c	SPAC13F5.02c	taf5	ptr6	taf72	taf7	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mitsuzawa H (2002)	11972332	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249552	2539353	2542822	275919	279269	SPCC5E4.03c	SPAC13F5.02c	taf5	ptr6	taf72	taf7	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mitsuzawa H (2001)	11279037	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249553	2539353	2539133	275919	275705	SPCC5E4.03c	SPCC16C4.18c	taf5	taf6	taf72	taf50	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mitsuzawa H (2002)	11972332	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249554	2540361	2539700	276890	276253	SPBC2F12.13	SPBC1685.15c	klp5	klp6	sot1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Garcia MA (2002)	11967147	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249555	2539700	2540361	276253	276890	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC2F12.13	klp6	klp5	SPBC649.01c|sot2	sot1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Garcia MA (2002)	11967147	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249556	2540650	2540650	277175	277175	SPBC244.01c	SPBC244.01c	sid4	sid4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tomlin GC (2002)	11950932	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249557	2540650	2539149	277175	275721	SPBC244.01c	SPCC1739.11c	sid4	cdc11	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tomlin GC (2002)	11950932	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249558	2540650	2539149	277175	275721	SPBC244.01c	SPCC1739.11c	sid4	cdc11	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Tomlin GC (2002)	11950932	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249559	2539149	2540650	275721	277175	SPCC1739.11c	SPBC244.01c	cdc11	sid4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tomlin GC (2002)	11950932	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249560	3361036	2540250	280112	276782	SPCC320.13c	SPBC336.15	ark1	pic1	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	SPBC685.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Leverson JD (2002)	11950927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249561	2539047	2543044	275620	279479	SPCC1223.06	SPAC3C7.12	tea1	tip1	alp8	noc1	Co-localization	physical	Niccoli T (2002)	11950884	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249562	2541209	2542873	277723	279318	SPBC887.10	SPAC9G1.02	mcs4	wis4	-	wak1|wik1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Buck V (2001)	11179424	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249563	2543481	2539869	279901	276415	SPAPB2B4.03	SPBC11B10.09	cig2	cdc2	cyc17	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yamano H (2000)	11163211	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249564	2539164	2540784	275735	277303	SPCC16A11.17	SPBC211.04c	mcm4	mcm6	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	mis5	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Lee JK (2001)	11136247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249565	2539164	2540630	275735	277156	SPCC16A11.17	SPBC25D12.03c	mcm4	mcm7	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Lee JK (2001)	11136247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249566	2540784	2540630	277303	277156	SPBC211.04c	SPBC25D12.03c	mcm6	mcm7	mis5	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Lee JK (2001)	11136247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249567	2540819	2539938	277337	276482	SPBC18H10.03	SPBC17D11.05	tif35	tif32	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Akiyoshi Y (2001)	11134033	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249568	2540819	2543537	277337	279954	SPBC18H10.03	SPAC4D7.05	tif35	sum1	-	tif34	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Akiyoshi Y (2001)	11134033	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249569	2540819	2541089	277337	277604	SPBC18H10.03	SPBC646.09c	tif35	int6	-	yin6	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Akiyoshi Y (2001)	11134033	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249570	2542632	2542029	279086	278511	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC8E11.02c	cdc25	rad24	sal2	anr5|sam4	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Zeng Y (1998)	9774107	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249571	2542632	2542029	279086	278511	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC8E11.02c	cdc25	rad24	sal2	anr5|sam4	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Zeng Y (1999)	10523629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249572	2541908	2541643	278398	278139	SPAC23D3.02	SPAC14C4.13	rfc2	rad17	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kai M (2001)	11313455	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249573	2539123	2543539	275695	279956	SPCC18B5.03	SPAC926.04c	wee1	hsp90	-	git10|swo1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Goes FS (2001)	11298745	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249574	2540885	2543539	277402	279956	SPBC660.14	SPAC926.04c	mik1	hsp90	-	git10|swo1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Goes FS (2001)	11298745	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249575	2539123	2542472	275695	278933	SPCC18B5.03	SPAC9E9.13	wee1	wos2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Goes FS (2001)	11298745	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249576	2540885	2542472	277402	278933	SPBC660.14	SPAC9E9.13	mik1	wos2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Goes FS (2001)	11298745	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249577	2541726	2543027	278220	279463	SPAC22H10.07	SPAC110.03	scd2	cdc42	ral3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Endo M (2003)	12409291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249578	2541726	2541726	278220	278220	SPAC22H10.07	SPAC22H10.07	scd2	scd2	ral3	ral3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Endo M (2003)	12409291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249579	2539997	2543027	276541	279463	SPBC1604.14c	SPAC110.03	shk1	cdc42	orb2|pak1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Endo M (2003)	12409291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249580	2539997	2541726	276541	278220	SPBC1604.14c	SPAC22H10.07	shk1	scd2	orb2|pak1	ral3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Endo M (2003)	12409291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249581	2542337	2541726	278803	278220	SPAC16E8.09	SPAC22H10.07	scd1	scd2	ral1	ral3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Endo M (2003)	12409291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249582	2542337	2543027	278803	279463	SPAC16E8.09	SPAC110.03	scd1	cdc42	ral1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Endo M (2003)	12409291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249583	2542274	2540398	278743	276926	SPAC1952.13	SPBC26H8.10	ned1	dis3	-	rrp44	Two-hybrid	physical	Tange Y (2002)	12376568	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249584	2542274	2541059	278743	277574	SPAC1952.13	SPBC557.03c	ned1	pim1	-	dcd1|ptr2	Two-hybrid	physical	Tange Y (2002)	12376568	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249585	2542274	2541547	278743	278047	SPAC1952.13	SPAC1486.05	ned1	nup189	-	nup189C|nup189N|nup96|nup98	Two-hybrid	physical	Tange Y (2002)	12376568	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249586	2541633	2542239	278129	278711	SPAC664.01c	SPAC18G6.02c	swi6	chp1	SPAC824.10c	-	Co-localization	physical	Partridge JF (2002)	12361567	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249587	2539869	2540880	276415	277397	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC582.03	cdc2	cdc13	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Decottignies A (2001)	11683390	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249588	2542313	2540115	278779	276652	SPAC16A10.07c	SPBC1778.02	taz1	rap1	myb|myb1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Kanoh J (2001)	11676925	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249589	2542313	2542144	278779	278620	SPAC16A10.07c	SPAC6F6.17	taz1	rif1	myb|myb1	SPAPJ736.01|tap1|tap11	Two-hybrid	physical	Kanoh J (2001)	11676925	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249590	2540115	2540115	276652	276652	SPBC1778.02	SPBC1778.02	rap1	rap1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Kanoh J (2001)	11676925	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249591	2540115	2542313	276652	278779	SPBC1778.02	SPAC16A10.07c	rap1	taz1	-	myb|myb1	Two-hybrid	physical	Chikashige Y (2001)	11676924	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249592	2539149	2540650	275721	277175	SPCC1739.11c	SPBC244.01c	cdc11	sid4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Krapp A (2001)	11676915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249593	2540650	2539149	277175	275721	SPBC244.01c	SPCC1739.11c	sid4	cdc11	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Krapp A (2001)	11676915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249594	2539149	2540650	275721	277175	SPCC1739.11c	SPBC244.01c	cdc11	sid4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Krapp A (2001)	11676915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249595	2540630	2540620	277156	277146	SPBC25D12.03c	SPBC4.04c	mcm7	mcm2	-	cdc19|nda1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Liang DT (2001)	11606526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249596	2540630	2538838	277156	275419	SPBC25D12.03c	SPCC1682.02c	mcm7	mcm3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Liang DT (2001)	11606526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249597	2540630	2539164	277156	275735	SPBC25D12.03c	SPCC16A11.17	mcm7	mcm4	-	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Liang DT (2001)	11606526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249598	2540630	2542477	277156	278937	SPBC25D12.03c	SPAC1B2.05	mcm7	mcm5	-	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Liang DT (2001)	11606526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249599	2540630	2540784	277156	277303	SPBC25D12.03c	SPBC211.04c	mcm7	mcm6	-	mis5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Liang DT (2001)	11606526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249600	2540630	2540630	277156	277156	SPBC25D12.03c	SPBC25D12.03c	mcm7	mcm7	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Liang DT (2001)	11606526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249601	2543086	2543580	279519	279995	SPAC30D11.10	SPAC644.14c	rad52	rad51	rad22|rad22A	rhp51	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ho JC (2001)	11600706	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249602	2542196	2543086	278671	279519	SPAC30D11.13	SPAC30D11.10	hus5	rad52	ubc9	rad22|rad22A	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ho JC (2001)	11600706	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249603	2539447	2541633	276010	278129	SPCC338.17c	SPAC664.01c	rad21	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Co-localization	physical	Bernard P (2001)	11598266	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249604	2541628	2539447	278124	276010	SPAC110.02	SPCC338.17c	pds5	rad21	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Tanaka K (2001)	11598020	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249605	2539666	2541628	276221	278124	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC110.02	eso1	pds5	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tanaka K (2001)	11598020	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249606	2541628	2539666	278124	276221	SPAC110.02	SPBC16A3.11	pds5	eso1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tanaka K (2001)	11598020	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249607	2542667	2540329	279120	276859	SPAC26A3.16	SPBC29B5.01	dph1	atf1	ucp5	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wilkinson CR (2001)	11584278	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249608	2542667	2541268	279120	277782	SPAC26A3.16	SPBP19A11.03c	dph1	mts4	ucp5	rpn1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wilkinson CR (2001)	11584278	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249609	2540481	2540329	277009	276859	SPBC2D10.12	SPBC29B5.01	rhp23	atf1	-	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wilkinson CR (2001)	11584278	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249610	2540481	2541268	277009	277782	SPBC2D10.12	SPBP19A11.03c	rhp23	mts4	-	rpn1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wilkinson CR (2001)	11584278	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249611	2543682	2540329	280096	276859	SPAC637.10c	SPBC29B5.01	rpn10	atf1	pus1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wilkinson CR (2001)	11584278	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249612	2543682	2541268	280096	277782	SPAC637.10c	SPBP19A11.03c	rpn10	mts4	pus1	rpn1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wilkinson CR (2001)	11584278	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249613	2539353	2542513	275919	278971	SPCC5E4.03c	SPAC1952.05	taf5	gcn5	taf72	kat2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mitsuzawa H (2001)	11279037	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249614	2542949	2538731	279389	275315	SPAC1142.05	SPCC1393.10	ctr5	ctr4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhou H (2001)	11274192	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249615	2542313	2541735	278779	278229	SPAC16A10.07c	SPAC7D4.04	taz1	atg11	myb|myb1	taf1|cvt9	Two-hybrid	physical	Ueno M (2001)	11270572	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249616	2541011	2542097	277526	278573	SPBC337.14	SPACUNK4.06c	rpb4	rpb7	-	SPAPYUK71.02	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Sakurai H (1999)	10523639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249617	2542632	2542029	279086	278511	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC8E11.02c	cdc25	rad24	sal2	anr5|sam4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zeng Y (1999)	10523629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249618	2541159	2540470	277674	276998	SPBC685.09	SPBC29A10.15	orc2	orc1	orp2	cdc30|orp1|rid1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lygerou Z (1999)	10523506	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249619	2541107	2540470	277622	276998	SPBC646.14c	SPBC29A10.15	orc5	orc1	-	cdc30|orp1|rid1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lygerou Z (1999)	10523506	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249620	2540719	2540719	277242	277242	SPBC216.05	SPBC216.05	rad3	rad3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chapman CR (1999)	10512862	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249621	2540719	2539087	277242	275659	SPBC216.05	SPCC1259.13	rad3	chk1	-	rad27	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chapman CR (1999)	10512862	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249622	2542293	2541612	278761	278109	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC1F7.04	pck1	rho1	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Arellano M (1999)	10504305	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249624	2542293	2542773	278761	279222	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC16.01	pck1	rho2	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Arellano M (1999)	10504305	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249625	2542293	2543027	278761	279463	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC110.03	pck1	cdc42	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Arellano M (1999)	10504305	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249626	2539649	2541612	276204	278109	SPBC12D12.04c	SPAC1F7.04	pck2	rho1	pkc1|sts6	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Arellano M (1999)	10504305	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249628	2539649	2542773	276204	279222	SPBC12D12.04c	SPAC16.01	pck2	rho2	pkc1|sts6	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Arellano M (1999)	10504305	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249629	2539649	2543027	276204	279463	SPBC12D12.04c	SPAC110.03	pck2	cdc42	pkc1|sts6	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Arellano M (1999)	10504305	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249630	2541612	2542293	278109	278761	SPAC1F7.04	SPAC17G8.14c	rho1	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Arellano M (1999)	10504305	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249631	2538816	2541446	275397	277951	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC23G3.01	rpb3	rpb2	-	SPAC521.06	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mitobe J (1999)	10503538	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249632	2538816	2541910	275397	278400	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC23C4.15	rpb3	rpb5	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mitobe J (1999)	10503538	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249633	2538816	2539083	275397	275655	SPCC1442.10c	SPCC1020.04c	rpb3	rpb6	-	rpo15	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mitobe J (1999)	10503538	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249634	2538816	2543112	275397	279544	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC3A12.07	rpb3	rpb11	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mitobe J (1999)	10503538	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249635	2540804	2542304	277323	278771	SPBC18E5.03c	SPAC1687.20c	sim4	mis6	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249636	2538990	2540352	275564	276881	SPCC1494.05c	SPBC215.03c	ubp12	csn1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhou C (2003)	12718879	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249637	2538990	2541529	275564	278029	SPCC1494.05c	SPAC1687.13c	ubp12	csn5	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhou C (2003)	12718879	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249638	2538990	2542637	275564	279091	SPCC1494.05c	SPAC24H6.03	ubp12	cul3	-	pcu3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhou C (2003)	12718879	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249639	2540329	2542047	276859	278528	SPBC29B5.01	SPAC21E11.03c	atf1	pcr1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	mts2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kanoh J (1996)	9135083	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249640	2540027	2540027	276571	276571	SPBC1734.14c	SPBC1734.14c	suc1	suc1	p13	p13	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Khazanovich N (1996)	8805536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249641	2539219	2540589	275789	277115	SPCC1795.01c	SPBC20F10.06	mad3	mad2	SPCC895.02	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Petersen J (2003)	12676091	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249642	2541045	2539090	277560	275662	SPBC543.03c	SPCC126.02c	pku80	pku70	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miyoshi T (2003)	12424244	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249643	2541045	2539090	277560	275662	SPBC543.03c	SPCC126.02c	pku80	pku70	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Miyoshi T (2003)	12424244	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249644	2543240	2538959	279668	275533	SPAC694.06c	SPCC18B5.11c	mrc1	cds1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Zhao H (2003)	14585996	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249645	2543240	2540719	279668	277242	SPAC694.06c	SPBC216.05	mrc1	rad3	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Zhao H (2003)	14585996	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249646	2543240	2539209	279668	275779	SPAC694.06c	SPCC23B6.03c	mrc1	tel1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Zhao H (2003)	14585996	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249647	2542337	2540361	278803	276890	SPAC16E8.09	SPBC2F12.13	scd1	klp5	ral1	sot1	Two-hybrid	physical	Li Y (2003)	14573463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249648	2542337	2539700	278803	276253	SPAC16E8.09	SPBC1685.15c	scd1	klp6	ral1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Two-hybrid	physical	Li Y (2003)	14573463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249649	2540361	2539700	276890	276253	SPBC2F12.13	SPBC1685.15c	klp5	klp6	sot1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Two-hybrid	physical	Li Y (2003)	14573463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249650	2540361	2540361	276890	276890	SPBC2F12.13	SPBC2F12.13	klp5	klp5	sot1	sot1	Two-hybrid	physical	Li Y (2003)	14573463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249651	2542337	2540361	278803	276890	SPAC16E8.09	SPBC2F12.13	scd1	klp5	ral1	sot1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Li Y (2003)	14573463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249652	2542337	2539700	278803	276253	SPAC16E8.09	SPBC1685.15c	scd1	klp6	ral1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Li Y (2003)	14573463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249653	2543027	2540361	279463	276890	SPAC110.03	SPBC2F12.13	cdc42	klp5	-	sot1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Li Y (2003)	14573463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249654	2543027	2539700	279463	276253	SPAC110.03	SPBC1685.15c	cdc42	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Li Y (2003)	14573463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249655	2541798	2543580	278289	279995	SPAC22F3.03c	SPAC644.14c	rdh54	rad51	mug34|tid1	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Catlett MG (2003)	14551247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249656	2541798	2542106	278289	278582	SPAC22F3.03c	SPAC8E11.03c	rdh54	dmc1	mug34|tid1	dmp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Catlett MG (2003)	14551247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249657	2542749	2543580	279199	279995	SPAC15A10.03c	SPAC644.14c	rad54	rad51	rhp54	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Catlett MG (2003)	14551247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249658	2542106	2542106	278582	278582	SPAC8E11.03c	SPAC8E11.03c	dmc1	dmc1	dmp1	dmp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Catlett MG (2003)	14551247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249659	2543580	2540121	279995	276658	SPAC644.14c	SPBC119.14	rad51	rti1	rhp51	rad22B	Two-hybrid	physical	Catlett MG (2003)	14551247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249660	2543580	2543580	279995	279995	SPAC644.14c	SPAC644.14c	rad51	rad51	rhp51	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Catlett MG (2003)	14551247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249661	2543580	2543086	279995	279519	SPAC644.14c	SPAC30D11.10	rad51	rad52	rhp51	rad22|rad22A	Two-hybrid	physical	Catlett MG (2003)	14551247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249662	2543478	2541657	279898	278153	SPAC688.06c	SPAP27G11.15	slx4	slx1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Coulon S (2004)	14528010	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249663	2541657	2543478	278153	279898	SPAP27G11.15	SPAC688.06c	slx1	slx4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Coulon S (2004)	14528010	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249664	2542637	2541897	279091	278387	SPAC24H6.03	SPAC23H4.18c	cul3	rbx1	pcu3	pip1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Geyer R (2003)	14527422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249665	2542637	2540129	279091	276666	SPAC24H6.03	SPBC12D12.08c	cul3	ned8	pcu3	SPBC24C6.01c|nedd8|ubl1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Geyer R (2003)	14527422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249666	2542637	2540083	279091	276621	SPAC24H6.03	SPBC119.02	cul3	ubc4	pcu3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Geyer R (2003)	14527422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249667	2542637	2538714	279091	275298	SPAC24H6.03	SPCC330.11	cul3	btb1	pcu3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Geyer R (2003)	14527422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249674	2542380	2543143	278844	279575	SPAC17G6.04c	SPAPB1A10.04c	cpp1	cwp1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Yang W (2000)	10617635	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249675	2539997	2539237	276541	275807	SPBC1604.14c	SPCC24B10.13	shk1	skb5	orb2|pak1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Yang P (1999)	10593886	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249676	2539997	2539237	276541	275807	SPBC1604.14c	SPCC24B10.13	shk1	skb5	orb2|pak1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yang P (1999)	10593886	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249677	2542175	2540919	278650	277435	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC543.07	mkh1	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Two-hybrid	physical	Loewith R (2000)	10591634	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249678	2539027	2541652	275600	278148	SPCC1322.08	SPAC24B11.06c	srk1	sty1	mkp1	phh1|spc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Smith DA (2002)	12080074	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249679	2541652	2539027	278148	275600	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC1322.08	sty1	srk1	phh1|spc1	mkp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Smith DA (2002)	12080074	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249680	2542337	2543412	278803	279834	SPAC16E8.09	SPAC637.07	scd1	moe1	ral1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Chen CR (1999)	9892665	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249681	2542337	2543412	278803	279834	SPAC16E8.09	SPAC637.07	scd1	moe1	ral1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chen CR (1999)	9892665	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249682	2542337	2543412	278803	279834	SPAC16E8.09	SPAC637.07	scd1	moe1	ral1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen CR (1999)	9892665	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249683	2543407	2540426	279829	276954	SPAC8F11.07c	SPBC23E6.07c	cdc24	rfc1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tanaka H (1999)	9891039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249684	2543407	2540020	279829	276564	SPAC8F11.07c	SPBC16D10.09	cdc24	pcn1	-	pcn	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tanaka H (1999)	9891039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249685	2543041	2540606	279476	277132	SPAC3C7.11c	SPBC428.03c	cnx1	pho4	cal1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jannatipour M (1998)	9860839	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249686	2543027	2539997	279463	276541	SPAC110.03	SPBC1604.14c	cdc42	shk1	-	orb2|pak1	Two-hybrid	physical	Tu H (1999)	9858584	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249687	2539997	2543027	276541	279463	SPBC1604.14c	SPAC110.03	shk1	cdc42	orb2|pak1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tu H (1999)	9858584	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249688	2539997	2539997	276541	276541	SPBC1604.14c	SPBC1604.14c	shk1	shk1	orb2|pak1	orb2|pak1	Two-hybrid	physical	Tu H (1999)	9858584	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249691	2539997	2543027	276541	279463	SPBC1604.14c	SPAC110.03	shk1	cdc42	orb2|pak1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ottilie S (1995)	8846783	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249692	2541652	2542677	278148	279130	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC26F1.10c	sty1	pyp1	phh1|spc1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Shiozaki K (1995)	7501024	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249693	2543040	2541268	279475	277782	SPAC31G5.13	SPBP19A11.03c	rpn11	mts4	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	rpn1	Co-localization	physical	Wilkinson CR (1998)	9822592	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249694	2539285	2539285	275853	275853	SPCC1672.02c	SPCC1672.02c	sap1	sap1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Arcangioli B (1994)	8065904	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249695	2539285	2539285	275853	275853	SPCC1672.02c	SPCC1672.02c	sap1	sap1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Arcangioli B (1994)	8065904	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249696	3361487	2541652	280563	278148	SPAC1805.17	SPAC24B11.06c	crm1	sty1	SPAC1B2.01|caf2	phh1|spc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gaits F (1999)	10233152	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249697	3361487	2541652	280563	278148	SPAC1805.17	SPAC24B11.06c	crm1	sty1	SPAC1B2.01|caf2	phh1|spc1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Gaits F (1999)	10233152	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249698	2540471	2540555	276999	277082	SPBC19F8.07	SPBP16F5.02	mcs6	mcs2	cdk7|crk1|mop1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Lee KM (1999)	10226032	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249699	2543514	2540511	279932	277039	SPAC4D7.03	SPBC1718.01	pop2	pop1	sud1	SPBC2G2.18|ste16	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wolf DA (1999)	10209119	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249700	2539479	2539371	276042	275937	SPCC584.04	SPCC18B5.06	sup35	dom34	erf3	SPCC18B5.06|erf1|sup45	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ebihara K (1999)	10376874	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249701	2539479	2539371	276042	275937	SPCC584.04	SPCC18B5.06	sup35	dom34	erf3	SPCC18B5.06|erf1|sup45	Two-hybrid	physical	Ebihara K (1999)	10376874	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249702	2540919	2539920	277435	276464	SPBC543.07	SPBC119.08	pek1	pmk1	mkk1|skh1	spm1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sugiura R (1999)	10365961	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249703	2540727	2539741	277250	276293	SPBC1921.03c	SPBC16A3.05c	mex67	rae1	-	cut21	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yoon JH (2000)	11073978	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249704	2540727	2539741	277250	276293	SPBC1921.03c	SPBC16A3.05c	mex67	rae1	-	cut21	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Yoon JH (2000)	11073978	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249705	2539004	2538959	275578	275533	SPCC4G3.05c	SPCC18B5.11c	mus81	cds1	slx3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Boddy MN (2000)	11073977	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249706	2539447	2540557	276010	277084	SPCC338.17c	SPBC29A10.04	rad21	psm1	-	smc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tomonaga T (2000)	11069892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249707	2539447	2543010	276010	279448	SPCC338.17c	SPAC10F6.09c	rad21	psm3	-	smc3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tomonaga T (2000)	11069892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249708	2543545	2539513	279962	276075	SPAC926.03	SPCC645.05c	rlc1	myo2	-	rng5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Le Goff X (2000)	11069761	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249709	2539513	2543545	276075	279962	SPCC645.05c	SPAC926.03	myo2	rlc1	rng5	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Le Goff X (2000)	11069761	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249710	2543545	2543576	279962	279991	SPAC926.03	SPAC4A8.05c	rlc1	myp2	-	myo3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Le Goff X (2000)	11069761	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249711	2543576	2543545	279991	279962	SPAC4A8.05c	SPAC926.03	myp2	rlc1	myo3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Le Goff X (2000)	11069761	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249712	2543545	2541699	279962	278195	SPAC926.03	SPAP8A3.08	rlc1	cdc4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Le Goff X (2000)	11069761	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249713	2541592	2543222	278089	279650	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC821.08c	cut9	slp1	dre1	cdc20	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yamada HY (2000)	11058086	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249714	2541592	2540589	278089	277115	SPAC6F12.15c	SPBC20F10.06	cut9	mad2	dre1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yamada HY (2000)	11058086	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249715	2543545	2539513	279962	276075	SPAC926.03	SPCC645.05c	rlc1	myo2	-	rng5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Naqvi NI (2000)	11056543	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249716	2543545	2541699	279962	278195	SPAC926.03	SPAP8A3.08	rlc1	cdc4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Naqvi NI (2000)	11056543	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249717	2539135	2539933	275707	276477	SPCC553.09c	SPBC17D11.06	spb70	spp2	pol12	pri2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Uchiyama M (2004)	15314153	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249718	2539933	2539135	276477	275707	SPBC17D11.06	SPCC553.09c	spp2	spb70	pri2	pol12	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Uchiyama M (2004)	15314153	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249719	2539135	2543323	275707	279746	SPCC553.09c	SPAC6B12.10c	spb70	spp1	pol12	pri1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Uchiyama M (2004)	15314153	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249720	2539135	2540470	275707	276998	SPCC553.09c	SPBC29A10.15	spb70	orc1	pol12	cdc30|orp1|rid1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Uchiyama M (2004)	15314153	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249721	2539135	2541159	275707	277674	SPCC553.09c	SPBC685.09	spb70	orc2	pol12	orp2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Uchiyama M (2004)	15314153	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249722	2540329	2540368	276859	276897	SPBC29B5.01	SPBC36.05c	atf1	clr6	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kim HS (2004)	15292231	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249723	2540329	2540821	276859	277339	SPBC29B5.01	SPBC800.03	atf1	clr3	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kim HS (2004)	15292231	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249724	2541633	2542047	278129	278528	SPAC664.01c	SPAC21E11.03c	swi6	pcr1	SPAC824.10c	mts2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kim HS (2004)	15292231	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249725	2541633	2540329	278129	276859	SPAC664.01c	SPBC29B5.01	swi6	atf1	SPAC824.10c	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kim HS (2004)	15292231	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249729	2538838	2542266	275419	278735	SPCC1682.02c	SPAC17D4.02	mcm3	cdc45	-	goa1|sna41	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dolan WP (2004)	15338237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249730	2542266	2538838	278735	275419	SPAC17D4.02	SPCC1682.02c	cdc45	mcm3	goa1|sna41	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dolan WP (2004)	15338237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249733	2539164	2542266	275735	278735	SPCC16A11.17	SPAC17D4.02	mcm4	cdc45	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	goa1|sna41	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dolan WP (2004)	15338237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249734	2542266	2539164	278735	275735	SPAC17D4.02	SPCC16A11.17	cdc45	mcm4	goa1|sna41	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dolan WP (2004)	15338237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249737	2540784	2542266	277303	278735	SPBC211.04c	SPAC17D4.02	mcm6	cdc45	mis5	goa1|sna41	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dolan WP (2004)	15338237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249738	2542266	2540784	278735	277303	SPAC17D4.02	SPBC211.04c	cdc45	mcm6	goa1|sna41	mis5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dolan WP (2004)	15338237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249741	2540630	2542266	277156	278735	SPBC25D12.03c	SPAC17D4.02	mcm7	cdc45	-	goa1|sna41	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dolan WP (2004)	15338237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249742	2542266	2540630	278735	277156	SPAC17D4.02	SPBC25D12.03c	cdc45	mcm7	goa1|sna41	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dolan WP (2004)	15338237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249744	2540992	2540992	277508	277508	SPBC342.05	SPBC342.05	crb2	crb2	rhp9	rhp9	Two-hybrid	physical	Du LL (2004)	15229228	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249745	2540992	2540992	277508	277508	SPBC342.05	SPBC342.05	crb2	crb2	rhp9	rhp9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Du LL (2004)	15229228	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249746	3361255	2541330	280331	277842	SPBC428.01c	SPBP35G2.06c	nup107	nup131	SPBC582.11c	Nup133a	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bai SW (2004)	15226438	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249747	3361255	2542378	280331	278842	SPBC428.01c	SPAC1805.04	nup107	nup132	SPBC582.11c	Nup133b	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bai SW (2004)	15226438	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249748	2539829	2540505	276378	277033	SPBC17G9.04c	SPBC3B9.16c	nup85	nup120	ptr5	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bai SW (2004)	15226438	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249749	2541682	2540505	278178	277033	SPAC15F9.02	SPBC3B9.16c	seh1	nup120	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bai SW (2004)	15226438	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249750	3361533	2542548	280609	279005	SPAC222.15	SPAC13A11.03	meu13	mcp7	SPAC821.01	mug32|mnd1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Saito TT (2004)	15210864	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249751	2542266	2542477	278735	278937	SPAC17D4.02	SPAC1B2.05	cdc45	mcm5	goa1|sna41	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yamada Y (2004)	15194812	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249752	2542266	2540630	278735	277156	SPAC17D4.02	SPBC25D12.03c	cdc45	mcm7	goa1|sna41	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yamada Y (2004)	15194812	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249753	2539487	2539047	276050	275620	SPCC895.05	SPCC1223.06	for3	tea1	-	alp8	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Feierbach B (2004)	15184402	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249754	2539047	2539487	275620	276050	SPCC1223.06	SPCC895.05	tea1	for3	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Feierbach B (2004)	15184402	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249755	2539047	2543044	275620	279479	SPCC1223.06	SPAC3C7.12	tea1	tip1	alp8	noc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Feierbach B (2004)	15184402	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249756	2539487	2539047	276050	275620	SPCC895.05	SPCC1223.06	for3	tea1	-	alp8	Two-hybrid	physical	Feierbach B (2004)	15184402	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249757	2539047	2543044	275620	279479	SPCC1223.06	SPAC3C7.12	tea1	tip1	alp8	noc1	Two-hybrid	physical	Feierbach B (2004)	15184402	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249759	2539773	2540294	276324	276825	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC31F10.04c	med7	srb4	-	med17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Tamayo E (2004)	15182371	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249760	2539773	2540761	276324	277281	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC21.04	med7	med8	-	sep15	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Tamayo E (2004)	15182371	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249761	2539773	2539249	276324	275819	SPBC14F5.08	SPCC1450.05c	med7	rox3	-	med19	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Tamayo E (2004)	15182371	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249762	2539773	2542413	276324	278877	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC29A4.07	med7	srb6	-	med22	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Tamayo E (2004)	15182371	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249763	2539773	2540292	276324	276823	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC28F2.12	med7	rpb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Tamayo E (2004)	15182371	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249764	2539773	2541446	276324	277951	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC23G3.01	med7	rpb2	-	SPAC521.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Tamayo E (2004)	15182371	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249765	2539773	2538816	276324	275397	SPBC14F5.08	SPCC1442.10c	med7	rpb3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Tamayo E (2004)	15182371	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249766	2539773	2542097	276324	278573	SPBC14F5.08	SPACUNK4.06c	med7	rpb7	-	SPAPYUK71.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Tamayo E (2004)	15182371	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249767	2539773	2541910	276324	278400	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC23C4.15	med7	rpb5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Tamayo E (2004)	15182371	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249768	2539773	2543112	276324	279544	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC3A12.07	med7	rpb11	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Tamayo E (2004)	15182371	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249769	2539773	2542233	276324	278705	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC1B3.12c	med7	rpb10	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Tamayo E (2004)	15182371	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249770	2539773	2540294	276324	276825	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC31F10.04c	med7	srb4	-	med17	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tamayo E (2004)	15182371	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249771	2539773	2540292	276324	276823	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC28F2.12	med7	rpb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tamayo E (2004)	15182371	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249772	2543044	2539857	279479	276404	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC1604.20c	tip1	tea2	noc1	klp4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Busch KE (2004)	15177031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249773	2539857	2543044	276404	279479	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC3C7.12	tea2	tip1	klp4	noc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Busch KE (2004)	15177031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249774	2539857	2542123	276404	278599	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC18G6.15	tea2	mal3	klp4	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Busch KE (2004)	15177031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249775	2541248	2539067	277762	275639	SPBC8D2.10c	SPCC576.08c	rmt3	rps2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bachand F (2004)	15175657	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249776	2541248	2539917	277762	276461	SPBC8D2.10c	SPBC839.15c	rmt3	tef103	-	ef1a-c|ef1-b|efa13	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bachand F (2004)	15175657	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249777	2541248	2542430	277762	278892	SPBC8D2.10c	SPAC17G6.06	rmt3	rps2401	-	rps24|rps24-1|rps24a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bachand F (2004)	15175657	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249778	2542083	2540255	278560	276786	SPAC27E2.05	SPBC336.04	cdc1	cdc6	mis1	mis10|pol3|pold	Two-hybrid	physical	Sanchez Garcia J (2004)	15173383	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249779	2540255	2542083	276786	278560	SPBC336.04	SPAC27E2.05	cdc6	cdc1	mis10|pol3|pold	mis1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Sanchez Garcia J (2004)	15173383	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249780	2540070	2540580	276608	277106	SPBC119.04	SPBC19C2.05	mei3	ran1	-	pat1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	McLeod M (1988)	3357510	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249781	2540142	2540149	276679	276686	SPBC1773.07c	SPBC1289.03c	sbp1	spi1	yrb1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	He X (1998)	9504913	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249782	2543222	2540589	279650	277115	SPAC821.08c	SPBC20F10.06	slp1	mad2	cdc20	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Kim SH (1998)	9461438	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249783	2540589	2543222	277115	279650	SPBC20F10.06	SPAC821.08c	mad2	slp1	-	cdc20	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kim SH (1998)	9461438	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249784	2540013	2541159	276557	277674	SPBC14C8.07c	SPBC685.09	cdc18	orc2	-	orp2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lopez-Girona A (1998)	9436991	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249785	2540013	2539869	276557	276415	SPBC14C8.07c	SPBC11B10.09	cdc18	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lopez-Girona A (1998)	9436991	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249786	2540013	2540880	276557	277397	SPBC14C8.07c	SPBC582.03	cdc18	cdc13	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lopez-Girona A (1998)	9436991	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249787	2540013	2543481	276557	279901	SPBC14C8.07c	SPAPB2B4.03	cdc18	cig2	-	cyc17	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lopez-Girona A (1998)	9436991	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249788	2543544	2543281	279961	279708	SPAC664.07c	SPAC23C4.18c	rad9	rad4	-	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Furuya K (2004)	15155581	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249789	2543281	2543544	279708	279961	SPAC23C4.18c	SPAC664.07c	rad4	rad9	cut5|dpb11|dre3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Furuya K (2004)	15155581	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249790	2543281	2540719	279708	277242	SPAC23C4.18c	SPBC216.05	rad4	rad3	cut5|dpb11|dre3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Furuya K (2004)	15155581	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249791	2540917	2542393	277433	278857	SPBC409.05	SPAC17G6.12	skp1	cul1	psh1|sph1	pcu1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lehmann A (2004)	15147268	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249792	2540917	2540511	277433	277039	SPBC409.05	SPBC1718.01	skp1	pop1	psh1|sph1	SPBC2G2.18|ste16	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lehmann A (2004)	15147268	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249793	2540917	2542914	277433	279356	SPBC409.05	SPAC57A10.05c	skp1	pof1	psh1|sph1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lehmann A (2004)	15147268	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249794	2540917	2539527	277433	276089	SPBC409.05	SPCC338.16	skp1	pof3	psh1|sph1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lehmann A (2004)	15147268	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249795	2540917	2542810	277433	279258	SPBC409.05	SPAC6F6.02c	skp1	pof5	psh1|sph1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lehmann A (2004)	15147268	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249796	2540917	2539142	277433	275714	SPBC409.05	SPCC1827.08c	skp1	pof7	psh1|sph1	SPCC70.11c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lehmann A (2004)	15147268	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249797	2540917	2542194	277433	278669	SPBC409.05	SPAC17G6.17	skp1	pof8	psh1|sph1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lehmann A (2004)	15147268	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249798	2540917	2540997	277433	277513	SPBC409.05	SPBC3H7.06c	skp1	pof9	psh1|sph1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lehmann A (2004)	15147268	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249799	2540917	2539767	277433	276318	SPBC409.05	SPBC1703.06	skp1	pof10	psh1|sph1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lehmann A (2004)	15147268	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249800	2540917	2540914	277433	277430	SPBC409.05	SPBC56F2.01	skp1	pof12	psh1|sph1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lehmann A (2004)	15147268	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249801	2540917	2540187	277433	276720	SPBC409.05	SPBC1271.01c	skp1	pof13	psh1|sph1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lehmann A (2004)	15147268	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249802	2540917	2540244	277433	276776	SPBC409.05	SPBC336.01	skp1	fbh1	psh1|sph1	fdh|fdh1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lehmann A (2004)	15147268	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249803	2539149	2539149	275721	275721	SPCC1739.11c	SPCC1739.11c	cdc11	cdc11	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Grallert A (2004)	15132994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249804	2542237	2541936	278709	278423	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC222.10c	fin1	byr4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Grallert A (2004)	15132994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249805	2542237	2541936	278709	278423	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC222.10c	fin1	byr4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Grallert A (2004)	15132994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249806	2541936	2542237	278423	278709	SPAC222.10c	SPAC19E9.02	byr4	fin1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Grallert A (2004)	15132994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249807	2542358	2542632	278823	279086	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC24H6.05	clp1	cdc25	flp1	sal2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Esteban V (2004)	15128870	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249808	2540128	2540219	276665	276752	SPBC15D4.03	SPBC31F10.13c	slm9	hip1	-	hir1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Blackwell C (2004)	15121850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249809	2541532	2542744	278032	279194	SPAC2C4.15c	SPAC1565.08	ubx2	cdc48	ucp13	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hartmann-Petersen R (2004)	15120077	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249810	2543170	2542744	279601	279194	SPAC343.09	SPAC1565.08	ubx3	cdc48	mug39	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hartmann-Petersen R (2004)	15120077	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249811	2539467	2540392	276030	276920	SPCC417.07c	SPBC365.15	mto1	alp4	mbo1|mod20	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sawin KE (2004)	15120067	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249812	2540392	2539467	276920	276030	SPBC365.15	SPCC417.07c	alp4	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sawin KE (2004)	15120067	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249813	2539467	2540690	276030	277215	SPCC417.07c	SPBC428.20c	mto1	alp6	mbo1|mod20	SPBC902.01c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sawin KE (2004)	15120067	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249814	2540690	2539467	277215	276030	SPBC428.20c	SPCC417.07c	alp6	mto1	SPBC902.01c	mbo1|mod20	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sawin KE (2004)	15120067	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249815	2540660	2542761	277185	279211	SPBC21.06c	SPAC1565.06c	cdc7	spg1	its10|pld1	sid3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sohrmann M (1998)	9420333	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249816	2539914	2540660	276458	277185	SPBC12D12.01	SPBC21.06c	sad1	cdc7	SPBC16H5.01c	its10|pld1	Co-localization	physical	Sohrmann M (1998)	9420333	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249817	2539914	2542761	276458	279211	SPBC12D12.01	SPAC1565.06c	sad1	spg1	SPBC16H5.01c	sid3	Co-localization	physical	Sohrmann M (1998)	9420333	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249818	2543281	2540992	279708	277508	SPAC23C4.18c	SPBC342.05	rad4	crb2	cut5|dpb11|dre3	rhp9	Two-hybrid	physical	Saka Y (1997)	9407031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249819	2543281	2542844	279708	279290	SPAC23C4.18c	SPAC13G7.08c	rad4	crb3	cut5|dpb11|dre3	ipi3	Two-hybrid	physical	Saka Y (1997)	9407031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249820	2543281	2540992	279708	277508	SPAC23C4.18c	SPBC342.05	rad4	crb2	cut5|dpb11|dre3	rhp9	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Saka Y (1997)	9407031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249821	2543281	2542844	279708	279290	SPAC23C4.18c	SPAC13G7.08c	rad4	crb3	cut5|dpb11|dre3	ipi3	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Saka Y (1997)	9407031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249822	2539087	2540992	275659	277508	SPCC1259.13	SPBC342.05	chk1	crb2	rad27	rhp9	Two-hybrid	physical	Saka Y (1997)	9407031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249823	2539087	2543281	275659	279708	SPCC1259.13	SPAC23C4.18c	chk1	rad4	rad27	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Two-hybrid	physical	Saka Y (1997)	9407031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249824	2540684	2540471	277209	276999	SPBC776.18c	SPBC19F8.07	pmh1	mcs6	mcr1	cdk7|crk1|mop1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Spahr H (2003)	14534314	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249825	2540684	2540555	277209	277082	SPBC776.18c	SPBP16F5.02	pmh1	mcs2	mcr1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Spahr H (2003)	14534314	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249826	2540684	2540051	277209	276589	SPBC776.18c	SPBC32H8.12c	pmh1	act1	mcr1	cps8|pi012	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Spahr H (2003)	14534314	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249827	2540684	2539035	277209	275608	SPBC776.18c	SPCC794.09c	pmh1	tef101	mcr1	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Spahr H (2003)	14534314	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249828	2539790	2539194	276340	275765	SPBC13G1.13	SPCC1682.07	tfb2	ssl1	SPBC31F10.01	tfh47	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Spahr H (2003)	14534314	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249829	2539790	2542174	276340	278649	SPBC13G1.13	SPAC17A5.06	tfb2	ptr8	SPBC31F10.01	ercc3sp	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Spahr H (2003)	14534314	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249830	2539790	2542336	276340	278802	SPBC13G1.13	SPAC16E8.11c	tfb2	tfb1	SPBC31F10.01	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Spahr H (2003)	14534314	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249831	2539790	2540343	276340	276872	SPBC13G1.13	SPBC30B4.07c	tfb2	tfb4	SPBC31F10.01	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Spahr H (2003)	14534314	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249832	2539818	2542772	276368	279221	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC16.02c	srp1	srp2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tang Z (2002)	12186627	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249833	2539818	2542772	276368	279221	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC16.02c	srp1	srp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tang Z (2002)	12186627	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249834	2542772	2539818	279221	276368	SPAC16.02c	SPBC11C11.08	srp2	srp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tang Z (2002)	12186627	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249835	2539838	2542477	276387	278937	SPBC1347.10	SPAC1B2.05	cdc23	mcm5	mcm10	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	Two-hybrid	physical	Hart EA (2002)	12185500	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249836	2539838	2539164	276387	275735	SPBC1347.10	SPCC16A11.17	cdc23	mcm4	mcm10	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Two-hybrid	physical	Hart EA (2002)	12185500	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249837	2539838	2540784	276387	277303	SPBC1347.10	SPBC211.04c	cdc23	mcm6	mcm10	mis5	Two-hybrid	physical	Hart EA (2002)	12185500	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249838	2539838	2540470	276387	276998	SPBC1347.10	SPBC29A10.15	cdc23	orc1	mcm10	cdc30|orp1|rid1	Two-hybrid	physical	Hart EA (2002)	12185500	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249839	2539838	2541159	276387	277674	SPBC1347.10	SPBC685.09	cdc23	orc2	mcm10	orp2	Two-hybrid	physical	Hart EA (2002)	12185500	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249840	2539838	2541107	276387	277622	SPBC1347.10	SPBC646.14c	cdc23	orc5	mcm10	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Hart EA (2002)	12185500	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249841	2539838	2540438	276387	276966	SPBC1347.10	SPBC2A9.12	cdc23	orc6	mcm10	SPBC2D10.02	Two-hybrid	physical	Hart EA (2002)	12185500	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249842	2541055	2541652	277570	278148	SPBC409.07c	SPAC24B11.06c	wis1	sty1	smf2|spc2	phh1|spc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nguyen AN (2002)	12181336	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249843	2541897	2542393	278387	278857	SPAC23H4.18c	SPAC17G6.12	rbx1	cul1	pip1	pcu1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seibert V (2002)	12167173	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249844	2542393	2541897	278857	278387	SPAC17G6.12	SPAC23H4.18c	cul1	rbx1	pcu1	pip1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seibert V (2002)	12167173	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249845	2541897	2540917	278387	277433	SPAC23H4.18c	SPBC409.05	rbx1	skp1	pip1	psh1|sph1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seibert V (2002)	12167173	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249846	2541897	2540511	278387	277039	SPAC23H4.18c	SPBC1718.01	rbx1	pop1	pip1	SPBC2G2.18|ste16	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seibert V (2002)	12167173	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249847	2540511	2541897	277039	278387	SPBC1718.01	SPAC23H4.18c	pop1	rbx1	SPBC2G2.18|ste16	pip1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seibert V (2002)	12167173	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249848	2541897	2543514	278387	279932	SPAC23H4.18c	SPAC4D7.03	rbx1	pop2	pip1	sud1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seibert V (2002)	12167173	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249849	2543514	2541897	279932	278387	SPAC4D7.03	SPAC23H4.18c	pop2	rbx1	sud1	pip1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seibert V (2002)	12167173	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249850	2540511	2542393	277039	278857	SPBC1718.01	SPAC17G6.12	pop1	cul1	SPBC2G2.18|ste16	pcu1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seibert V (2002)	12167173	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249851	2540511	2540917	277039	277433	SPBC1718.01	SPBC409.05	pop1	skp1	SPBC2G2.18|ste16	psh1|sph1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seibert V (2002)	12167173	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249852	2540511	2543514	277039	279932	SPBC1718.01	SPAC4D7.03	pop1	pop2	SPBC2G2.18|ste16	sud1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seibert V (2002)	12167173	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249853	2543514	2540511	279932	277039	SPAC4D7.03	SPBC1718.01	pop2	pop1	sud1	SPBC2G2.18|ste16	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seibert V (2002)	12167173	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249854	2543514	2542393	279932	278857	SPAC4D7.03	SPAC17G6.12	pop2	cul1	sud1	pcu1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seibert V (2002)	12167173	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249855	2543514	2540917	279932	277433	SPAC4D7.03	SPBC409.05	pop2	skp1	sud1	psh1|sph1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seibert V (2002)	12167173	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249856	2542393	2540917	278857	277433	SPAC17G6.12	SPBC409.05	cul1	skp1	pcu1	psh1|sph1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seibert V (2002)	12167173	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249857	2539640	2540511	276195	277039	SPBC32F12.09	SPBC1718.01	rum1	pop1	-	SPBC2G2.18|ste16	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Seibert V (2002)	12167173	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249858	2539640	2543514	276195	279932	SPBC32F12.09	SPAC4D7.03	rum1	pop2	-	sud1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Seibert V (2002)	12167173	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249859	2542660	2541115	279113	277630	SPAC328.03	SPBC660.07	tps1	ntp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Soto T (2002)	12153582	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249860	2541115	2541115	277630	277630	SPBC660.07	SPBC660.07	ntp1	ntp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Soto T (2002)	12153582	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249861	2542660	2542660	279113	279113	SPAC328.03	SPAC328.03	tps1	tps1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Soto T (2002)	12153582	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249862	2542660	2542577	279113	279033	SPAC328.03	SPAC19G12.15c	tps1	tpp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Soto T (2002)	12153582	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249863	2541115	2542577	277630	279033	SPBC660.07	SPAC19G12.15c	ntp1	tpp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Soto T (2002)	12153582	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249864	2543339	2541869	279762	278359	SPAC630.13c	SPAC22F3.13	tsc2	tsc1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Matsumoto S (2002)	12136010	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249865	2541869	2543339	278359	279762	SPAC22F3.13	SPAC630.13c	tsc1	tsc2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Matsumoto S (2002)	12136010	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249866	2539309	2540223	275876	276756	SPCC4G3.19	SPBC32F12.04	alp16	gtb1	-	tug1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Fujita A (2002)	12134075	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249867	2540690	2540223	277215	276756	SPBC428.20c	SPBC32F12.04	alp6	gtb1	SPBC902.01c	tug1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Fujita A (2002)	12134075	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249868	2540392	2540223	276920	276756	SPBC365.15	SPBC32F12.04	alp4	gtb1	-	tug1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Fujita A (2002)	12134075	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249869	2542576	2540436	279032	276964	SPAC22E12.09c	SPBC28F2.10c	krp1	ngg1	krp	ada3|kap1	Two-hybrid	physical	Jeong JW (2002)	12132578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249870	2542576	2540436	279032	276964	SPAC22E12.09c	SPBC28F2.10c	krp1	ngg1	krp	ada3|kap1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jeong JW (2002)	12132578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249871	2543629	2541633	280043	278129	SPAC3H5.06c	SPAC664.01c	pol1	swi6	polA|swi7	SPAC824.10c	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Nakayama Ji (2001)	11387218	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249872	2542266	2543629	278735	280043	SPAC17D4.02	SPAC3H5.06c	cdc45	pol1	goa1|sna41	polA|swi7	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Uchiyama M (2001)	11344166	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249873	2542266	2540784	278735	277303	SPAC17D4.02	SPBC211.04c	cdc45	mcm6	goa1|sna41	mis5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Uchiyama M (2001)	11344166	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249874	2539869	2540880	276415	277397	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC582.03	cdc2	cdc13	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tasto JJ (2001)	11329175	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249875	2539869	2539640	276415	276195	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC32F12.09	cdc2	rum1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tasto JJ (2001)	11329175	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249876	2541493	2541643	277995	278139	SPAC27E2.10c	SPAC14C4.13	rfc3	rad17	SPAPJ698.01c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Shimada M (1999)	10588638	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249877	2541643	2541493	278139	277995	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC27E2.10c	rad17	rfc3	-	SPAPJ698.01c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Shimada M (1999)	10588638	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249878	2542472	2539869	278933	276415	SPAC9E9.13	SPBC11B10.09	wos2	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Munoz MJ (1999)	10581266	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249879	2539869	2542472	276415	278933	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC9E9.13	cdc2	wos2	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Munoz MJ (1999)	10581266	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249880	2540880	2539869	277397	276415	SPBC582.03	SPBC11B10.09	cdc13	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Munoz MJ (1999)	10581266	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249881	2540880	2542472	277397	278933	SPBC582.03	SPAC9E9.13	cdc13	wos2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Munoz MJ (1999)	10581266	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249882	2541439	2542029	277944	278511	SPAC22F8.11	SPAC8E11.02c	plc1	rad24	-	anr5|sam4	Two-hybrid	physical	Andoh T (1998)	9613582	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249883	2541439	2542252	277944	278722	SPAC22F8.11	SPAC17A2.13c	plc1	rad25	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Andoh T (1998)	9613582	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249884	2541439	2542029	277944	278511	SPAC22F8.11	SPAC8E11.02c	plc1	rad24	-	anr5|sam4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Andoh T (1998)	9613582	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249885	2538959	2539123	275533	275695	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC18B5.03	cds1	wee1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Boddy MN (1998)	9572736	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249886	2539123	2538959	275695	275533	SPCC18B5.03	SPCC18B5.11c	wee1	cds1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Boddy MN (1998)	9572736	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249887	2538816	2541910	275397	278400	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC23C4.15	rpb3	rpb5	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Yasui K (1998)	9548938	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249888	2538816	2539083	275397	275655	SPCC1442.10c	SPCC1020.04c	rpb3	rpb6	-	rpo15	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Yasui K (1998)	9548938	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249889	2538816	2542233	275397	278705	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC1B3.12c	rpb3	rpb10	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Yasui K (1998)	9548938	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249890	2538816	2543112	275397	279544	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC3A12.07	rpb3	rpb11	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Yasui K (1998)	9548938	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249891	2538816	2540793	275397	277312	SPCC1442.10c	SPBC19C2.03	rpb3	rpc10	-	rpb12	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Yasui K (1998)	9548938	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249892	2538816	2539794	275397	276344	SPCC1442.10c	SPBC14C8.12	rpb3	rpb8	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Yasui K (1998)	9548938	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249893	2541746	2542558	278240	279014	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC1952.07	hus1	rad1	-	rad19	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kostrub CF (1998)	9524127	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249894	2542558	2541746	279014	278240	SPAC1952.07	SPAC20G4.04c	rad1	hus1	rad19	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kostrub CF (1998)	9524127	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249895	2539027	2541652	275600	278148	SPCC1322.08	SPAC24B11.06c	srk1	sty1	mkp1	phh1|spc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Asp E (2003)	12589433	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249896	2541652	2539027	278148	275600	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC1322.08	sty1	srk1	phh1|spc1	mkp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Asp E (2003)	12589433	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249897	2541982	2541652	278467	278148	SPAC23A1.06c	SPAC24B11.06c	cmk2	sty1	mkp2	phh1|spc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Asp E (2003)	12589433	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249898	2541089	2543682	277604	280096	SPBC646.09c	SPAC637.10c	int6	rpn10	yin6	pus1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249899	2541089	2541268	277604	277782	SPBC646.09c	SPBP19A11.03c	int6	mts4	yin6	rpn1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249900	2541089	2540939	277604	277455	SPBC646.09c	SPBC4.07c	int6	rpt2	yin6	mts2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249901	2541089	2540025	277604	276569	SPBC646.09c	SPBC16G5.01	int6	rpn12	yin6	SPBC342.07|mts3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249902	2541089	2542907	277604	279351	SPBC646.09c	SPAC1420.03	int6	rpn501	yin6	rpn5|rpn5-a	Two-hybrid	physical	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249903	2542907	2541089	279351	277604	SPAC1420.03	SPBC646.09c	rpn501	int6	rpn5|rpn5-a	yin6	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249904	2541089	2542907	277604	279351	SPBC646.09c	SPAC1420.03	int6	rpn501	yin6	rpn5|rpn5-a	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249905	2542907	2541268	279351	277782	SPAC1420.03	SPBP19A11.03c	rpn501	mts4	rpn5|rpn5-a	rpn1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249906	2542907	2540939	279351	277455	SPAC1420.03	SPBC4.07c	rpn501	rpt2	rpn5|rpn5-a	mts2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249907	2542907	2540025	279351	276569	SPAC1420.03	SPBC16G5.01	rpn501	rpn12	rpn5|rpn5-a	SPBC342.07|mts3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249908	2542907	2543412	279351	279834	SPAC1420.03	SPAC637.07	rpn501	moe1	rpn5|rpn5-a	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249909	2538816	2541446	275397	277951	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC23G3.01	rpb3	rpb2	-	SPAC521.06	Two-hybrid	physical	Qu Z (2001)	12552808	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249910	2539149	2541936	275721	278423	SPCC1739.11c	SPAC222.10c	cdc11	byr4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Krapp A (2003)	12546793	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249911	2541936	2539149	278423	275721	SPAC222.10c	SPCC1739.11c	byr4	cdc11	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Krapp A (2003)	12546793	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249912	2540511	2543481	277039	279901	SPBC1718.01	SPAPB2B4.03	pop1	cig2	SPBC2G2.18|ste16	cyc17	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yamano H (2004)	14970237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249913	2542358	2542632	278823	279086	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC24H6.05	clp1	cdc25	flp1	sal2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wolfe BA (2004)	14765109	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249914	2542632	2542358	279086	278823	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC1782.09c	cdc25	clp1	sal2	flp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wolfe BA (2004)	14765109	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249915	2539497	2543382	276060	279804	SPCC895.07	SPAC890.02c	alp14	alp7	mtc1	mia1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sato M (2004)	14742702	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249916	2543382	2539497	279804	276060	SPAC890.02c	SPCC895.07	alp7	alp14	mia1	mtc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sato M (2004)	14742702	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249917	2543382	2539497	279804	276060	SPAC890.02c	SPCC895.07	alp7	alp14	mia1	mtc1	Two-hybrid	physical	Sato M (2004)	14742702	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249918	2539497	2543382	276060	279804	SPCC895.07	SPAC890.02c	alp14	alp7	mtc1	mia1	Two-hybrid	physical	Sato M (2004)	14742702	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249919	2540719	2540992	277242	277508	SPBC216.05	SPBC342.05	rad3	crb2	-	rhp9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mochida S (2004)	14739927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249920	2539087	2540992	275659	277508	SPCC1259.13	SPBC342.05	chk1	crb2	rad27	rhp9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mochida S (2004)	14739927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249921	2540292	2541446	276823	277951	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC23G3.01	rpb1	rpb2	-	SPAC521.06	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimura M (1997)	9325316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249922	2540292	2538816	276823	275397	SPBC28F2.12	SPCC1442.10c	rpb1	rpb3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimura M (1997)	9325316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249923	2538816	2540292	275397	276823	SPCC1442.10c	SPBC28F2.12	rpb3	rpb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimura M (1997)	9325316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249924	2540292	2541910	276823	278400	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC23C4.15	rpb1	rpb5	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimura M (1997)	9325316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249925	2540292	2539083	276823	275655	SPBC28F2.12	SPCC1020.04c	rpb1	rpb6	-	rpo15	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimura M (1997)	9325316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249926	2540292	2542097	276823	278573	SPBC28F2.12	SPACUNK4.06c	rpb1	rpb7	-	SPAPYUK71.02	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimura M (1997)	9325316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249927	2540292	2539794	276823	276344	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC14C8.12	rpb1	rpb8	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimura M (1997)	9325316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249928	2540292	2543112	276823	279544	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC3A12.07	rpb1	rpb11	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimura M (1997)	9325316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249929	2540292	2540793	276823	277312	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC19C2.03	rpb1	rpc10	-	rpb12	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimura M (1997)	9325316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249930	2540292	2542233	276823	278705	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC1B3.12c	rpb1	rpb10	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimura M (1997)	9325316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249931	2538816	2541446	275397	277951	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC23G3.01	rpb3	rpb2	-	SPAC521.06	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimura M (1997)	9325316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249932	2538816	2541910	275397	278400	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC23C4.15	rpb3	rpb5	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimura M (1997)	9325316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249933	2538816	2539083	275397	275655	SPCC1442.10c	SPCC1020.04c	rpb3	rpb6	-	rpo15	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimura M (1997)	9325316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249934	2538816	2542097	275397	278573	SPCC1442.10c	SPACUNK4.06c	rpb3	rpb7	-	SPAPYUK71.02	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimura M (1997)	9325316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249935	2538816	2539794	275397	276344	SPCC1442.10c	SPBC14C8.12	rpb3	rpb8	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimura M (1997)	9325316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249936	2538816	2543112	275397	279544	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC3A12.07	rpb3	rpb11	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimura M (1997)	9325316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249937	2538816	2542233	275397	278705	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC1B3.12c	rpb3	rpb10	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimura M (1997)	9325316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249938	2538816	2540793	275397	277312	SPCC1442.10c	SPBC19C2.03	rpb3	rpc10	-	rpb12	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimura M (1997)	9325316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249939	2541268	2540939	277782	277455	SPBP19A11.03c	SPBC4.07c	mts4	rpt2	rpn1	mts2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Wilkinson CR (1997)	9325304	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249940	2541619	2539645	278116	276200	SPAC27F1.09c	SPBC146.07	prp10	prp2	sap155|SF3b155	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Banerjee H (2004)	14730023	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249941	2542239	2539403	278711	275968	SPAC18G6.02c	SPCC736.11	chp1	ago1	-	csp9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Verdel A (2004)	14704433	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249942	2542239	2540735	278711	277258	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC83.03c	chp1	tas3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Verdel A (2004)	14704433	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249943	2541522	2542299	278023	278766	SPAC23E2.01	SPAC18B11.10	fep1	tup11	gaf2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Znaidi S (2004)	14668334	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249947	2539640	2540880	276195	277397	SPBC32F12.09	SPBC582.03	rum1	cdc13	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Correa-Bordes J (1997)	9303310	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249948	2539640	2539869	276195	276415	SPBC32F12.09	SPBC11B10.09	rum1	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Correa-Bordes J (1997)	9303310	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249949	2541319	2539817	277831	276367	SPBP4H10.06c	SPBC146.03c	cut14	cut3	smc2	smc4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sutani T (1997)	9285594	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249950	2539087	2542632	275659	279086	SPCC1259.13	SPAC24H6.05	chk1	cdc25	rad27	sal2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Furnari B (1997)	9278510	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249951	2543629	2539933	280043	276477	SPAC3H5.06c	SPBC17D11.06	pol1	spp2	polA|swi7	pri2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tan S (2000)	11027257	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249952	2543629	2543323	280043	279746	SPAC3H5.06c	SPAC6B12.10c	pol1	spp1	polA|swi7	pri1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tan S (2000)	11027257	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249953	3361406	2539869	280482	276415	SPAC19E9.03	SPBC11B10.09	pas1	cdc2	SPAC57A10.01	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tanaka K (2000)	10982385	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249954	3361406	2539366	280482	275932	SPAC19E9.03	SPCC16C4.11	pas1	pef1	SPAC57A10.01	p31	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tanaka K (2000)	10982385	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249955	2541910	2540292	278400	276823	SPAC23C4.15	SPBC28F2.12	rpb5	rpb1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Miyao T (1996)	9077438	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249956	2541910	2541446	278400	277951	SPAC23C4.15	SPAC23G3.01	rpb5	rpb2	-	SPAC521.06	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Miyao T (1996)	9077438	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249957	2541910	2538816	278400	275397	SPAC23C4.15	SPCC1442.10c	rpb5	rpb3	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Miyao T (1996)	9077438	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249958	2541910	2541910	278400	278400	SPAC23C4.15	SPAC23C4.15	rpb5	rpb5	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Miyao T (1996)	9077438	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249959	2542083	2540255	278560	276786	SPAC27E2.05	SPBC336.04	cdc1	cdc6	mis1	mis10|pol3|pold	Reconstituted Complex	physical	MacNeill SA (1996)	8887553	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249960	2542083	2539627	278560	276184	SPAC27E2.05	SPBC1734.02c	cdc1	cdc27	mis1	SPBC337.18c	Reconstituted Complex	physical	MacNeill SA (1996)	8887553	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249962	2542804	2541652	279252	278148	SPAC29A4.16	SPAC24B11.06c	hal4	sty1	ppk10|sat4	phh1|spc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang LY (2005)	15870269	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249964	2541522	2541522	278023	278023	SPAC23E2.01	SPAC23E2.01	fep1	fep1	gaf2	gaf2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Pelletier B (2005)	15866870	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249965	2542299	2541522	278766	278023	SPAC18B11.10	SPAC23E2.01	tup11	fep1	-	gaf2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Pelletier B (2005)	15866870	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249966	2542224	2542224	278697	278697	SPAC19G12.03	SPAC19G12.03	cda1	cda1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Matsuo Y (2005)	15862318	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249967	2542224	2542224	278697	278697	SPAC19G12.03	SPAC19G12.03	cda1	cda1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Matsuo Y (2005)	15862318	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249968	2541720	2540810	278214	277329	SPAC23H3.13c	SPBC19C7.03	gpa2	cyr1	git8	git2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ivey FD (2005)	15831585	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249969	2540069	2539572	276607	276132	SPBC106.02c	SPCC576.03c	srx1	tpx1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bozonet SM (2005)	15824112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249970	2539047	2539642	275620	276197	SPCC1223.06	SPBC1706.01	tea1	tea4	alp8	wsh3	Co-localization	physical	Martin SG (2005)	15809031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249973	2538959	2539004	275533	275578	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC4G3.05c	cds1	mus81	-	slx3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kai M (2005)	15805465	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249974	2540555	2540917	277082	277433	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC409.05	mcs2	skp1	-	psh1|sph1	Two-hybrid	physical	Bamps S (2004)	15555586	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249975	2540471	2540555	276999	277082	SPBC19F8.07	SPBP16F5.02	mcs6	mcs2	cdk7|crk1|mop1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Bamps S (2004)	15555586	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249976	2540917	2540684	277433	277209	SPBC409.05	SPBC776.18c	skp1	pmh1	psh1|sph1	mcr1	Two-hybrid	physical	Bamps S (2004)	15555586	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249977	2540471	2540684	276999	277209	SPBC19F8.07	SPBC776.18c	mcs6	pmh1	cdk7|crk1|mop1	mcr1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Bamps S (2004)	15555586	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249978	2541620	2540032	278117	276575	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC1703.14c	rqh1	top1	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ahmad F (2005)	15702347	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249979	2540555	2540917	277082	277433	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC409.05	mcs2	skp1	-	psh1|sph1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bamps S (2004)	15555586	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249980	2540684	2540917	277209	277433	SPBC776.18c	SPBC409.05	pmh1	skp1	mcr1	psh1|sph1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bamps S (2004)	15555586	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249981	2540917	2542393	277433	278857	SPBC409.05	SPAC17G6.12	skp1	cul1	psh1|sph1	pcu1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bamps S (2004)	15555586	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249982	2539645	2542482	276200	278942	SPBC146.07	SPAP8A3.06	prp2	uaf2	mis11|ods1|uaf1	SPAP8A3.06|ods2	Two-hybrid	physical	Webb CJ (2005)	15548596	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249983	2541612	2539437	278109	276000	SPAC1F7.04	SPCC645.06c	rho1	rgf3	-	lad1	Two-hybrid	physical	Tajadura V (2004)	15546915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249984	2541455	2539352	277958	275918	SPAC6G9.06c	SPCC188.07	pcp1	ccq1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Flory MR (2004)	15546621	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249985	2541633	3361456	278129	280532	SPAC664.01c	SPAC1142.03c	swi6	swi2	SPAC824.10c	SPAC17G6.20c	Two-hybrid	physical	Jia S (2004)	15537537	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249986	3361456	2541633	280532	278129	SPAC1142.03c	SPAC664.01c	swi2	swi6	SPAC17G6.20c	SPAC824.10c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jia S (2004)	15537537	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249987	2542727	2541746	279177	278240	SPAC26A3.02	SPAC20G4.04c	myh1	hus1	myh	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chang DY (2005)	15533944	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249989	2542727	2542558	279177	279014	SPAC26A3.02	SPAC1952.07	myh1	rad1	myh	rad19	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chang DY (2005)	15533944	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249990	2542727	2543544	279177	279961	SPAC26A3.02	SPAC664.07c	myh1	rad9	myh	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chang DY (2005)	15533944	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249991	2543682	2540956	280096	277472	SPAC637.10c	SPBC409.06	rpn10	uch2	pus1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Stone M (2004)	15533439	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249992	2543682	2541819	280096	278310	SPAC637.10c	SPAC6G9.08	rpn10	ubp6	pus1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Stone M (2004)	15533439	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249993	2541819	2541268	278310	277782	SPAC6G9.08	SPBP19A11.03c	ubp6	mts4	-	rpn1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Stone M (2004)	15533439	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249994	2540956	2543682	277472	280096	SPBC409.06	SPAC637.10c	uch2	rpn10	-	pus1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Stone M (2004)	15533439	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249995	2543040	2540956	279475	277472	SPAC31G5.13	SPBC409.06	rpn11	uch2	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Stone M (2004)	15533439	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249996	2541033	2542503	277548	278961	SPBC3B9.21	SPAC19A8.12	dcp1	dcp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sakuno T (2004)	15671491	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249997	2538736	2541856	275320	278347	SPCC1322.12c	SPAC23H3.08c	bub1	bub3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kadura S (2005)	15525673	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249998	2541856	2538736	278347	275320	SPAC23H3.08c	SPCC1322.12c	bub3	bub1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kadura S (2005)	15525673	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
249999	3361036	2542358	280112	278823	SPCC320.13c	SPAC1782.09c	ark1	clp1	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	flp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Trautmann S (2004)	15525536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250000	2542069	3361400	278546	280476	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC1093.06c	ssm4	dhc1	SPAC637.01c	SPAC30C2.01c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Niccoli T (2004)	15509865	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250001	2542069	3361491	278546	280567	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC1805.08	ssm4	dlc1	SPAC637.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Niccoli T (2004)	15509865	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250002	3361323	2540728	280399	277251	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC216.06c	swi3	swi1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lee BS (2004)	15509785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250003	2540728	3361323	277251	280399	SPBC216.06c	SPBC30D10.04	swi1	swi3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lee BS (2004)	15509785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250004	2541856	2538736	278347	275320	SPAC23H3.08c	SPCC1322.12c	bub3	bub1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2004)	15509783	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250005	2538736	2541856	275320	278347	SPCC1322.12c	SPAC23H3.08c	bub1	bub3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2004)	15509783	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250006	2539467	2541264	276030	277778	SPCC417.07c	SPBC902.06	mto1	mto2	mbo1|mod20	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Venkatram S (2005)	15800064	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250007	2541264	2539467	277778	276030	SPBC902.06	SPCC417.07c	mto2	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Venkatram S (2005)	15800064	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250008	2541264	2539467	277778	276030	SPBC902.06	SPCC417.07c	mto2	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Venkatram S (2005)	15800064	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250009	2542070	2540292	278547	276823	SPAC29B12.02c	SPBC28F2.12	set2	rpb1	kmt3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kizer KO (2005)	15798214	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250010	2542070	2540292	278547	276823	SPAC29B12.02c	SPBC28F2.12	set2	rpb1	kmt3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kizer KO (2005)	15798214	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250011	2542070	2541446	278547	277951	SPAC29B12.02c	SPAC23G3.01	set2	rpb2	kmt3	SPAC521.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kizer KO (2005)	15798214	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250012	2540292	2542070	276823	278547	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC29B12.02c	rpb1	set2	-	kmt3	Far Western	physical	Kizer KO (2005)	15798214	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250013	2541065	2540730	277580	277253	SPBC3B9.15c	SPBC19C2.09	scp1	sre1	scap	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hughes AL (2005)	15797383	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250014	2542914	2542393	279356	278857	SPAC57A10.05c	SPAC17G6.12	pof1	cul1	-	pcu1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Harrison C (2005)	15660136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250015	2542707	2542914	279160	279356	SPAC25G10.03	SPAC57A10.05c	zip1	pof1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Harrison C (2005)	15660136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250016	2541861	2543222	278351	279650	SPAC5D6.08c	SPAC821.08c	mes1	slp1	-	cdc20	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Izawa D (2005)	15791259	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250019	2539155	2542123	275727	278599	SPCC1020.02	SPAC18G6.15	spc7	mal3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kerres A (2004)	15371542	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250020	2542123	2539155	278599	275727	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC1020.02	mal3	spc7	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kerres A (2004)	15371542	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250021	2540238	2539155	276770	275727	SPBC336.08	SPCC1020.02	spc24	spc7	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kerres A (2004)	15371542	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250022	2540238	2542004	276770	278487	SPBC336.08	SPAC27F1.04c	spc24	nuf2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kerres A (2004)	15371542	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250023	2540238	2540097	276770	276635	SPBC336.08	SPBC11C11.03	spc24	ndc80	-	ndc10|tid3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kerres A (2004)	15371542	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250024	2540238	2539200	276770	275771	SPBC336.08	SPCC188.04c	spc24	spc25	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kerres A (2004)	15371542	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250025	2541726	2543027	278220	279463	SPAC22H10.07	SPAC110.03	scd2	cdc42	ral3	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Wheatley E (2005)	15631622	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250026	2539513	2541699	276075	278195	SPCC645.05c	SPAP8A3.08	myo2	cdc4	rng5	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lord M (2004)	15504913	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250027	2539513	2543545	276075	279962	SPCC645.05c	SPAC926.03	myo2	rlc1	rng5	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lord M (2004)	15504913	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250028	2539513	2542611	276075	279065	SPCC645.05c	SPAC29A4.05	myo2	cam2	rng5	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lord M (2004)	15504913	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250029	2539659	2542611	276214	279065	SPBC146.13c	SPAC29A4.05	myo1	cam2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lord M (2004)	15504913	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250030	2539360	2539513	275926	276075	SPCC613.04c	SPCC645.05c	rng3	myo2	-	rng5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lord M (2004)	15504913	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250031	2539360	2539513	275926	276075	SPCC613.04c	SPCC645.05c	rng3	myo2	-	rng5	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Lord M (2004)	15504913	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250032	2538786	2540024	275367	276568	SPCC830.06	SPBP4H10.04	cnb1	ppb1	SPCC830.06	SPBC1346.01c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sio SO (2005)	15657058	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250034	2541047	2539155	277562	275727	SPBC409.09c	SPCC1020.02	mis13	spc7	cnl1	-	Co-localization	physical	Obuse C (2004)	15502821	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250035	3361330	2539020	280406	275593	SPBC20F10.04c	SPCC5E4.06	nse4	smc6	rad62	rad18	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Morikawa H (2004)	15485909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250036	2540473	2541195	277001	277709	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC839.17c	tor1	fkh1	-	SPBC24E9.17c	Two-hybrid	physical	Weisman R (2005)	15466417	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250037	2539808	2542393	276358	278857	SPBC17D11.01	SPAC17G6.12	nep1	cul1	SPBC20F10.11	pcu1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Zhou L (2005)	15769255	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250038	2539808	2542637	276358	279091	SPBC17D11.01	SPAC24H6.03	nep1	cul3	SPBC20F10.11	pcu3	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Zhou L (2005)	15769255	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250039	2539808	2543116	276358	279548	SPBC17D11.01	SPAC3A11.08	nep1	pcu4	SPBC20F10.11	Cul-4|cul4	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Zhou L (2005)	15769255	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250040	2540263	2542393	276794	278857	SPBC32H8.02c	SPAC17G6.12	nep2	cul1	mug120|pi021|SPACTOKYO_453.14c	pcu1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Zhou L (2005)	15769255	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250041	2541529	2539808	278029	276358	SPAC1687.13c	SPBC17D11.01	csn5	nep1	-	SPBC20F10.11	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhou L (2005)	15769255	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250042	2539369	2541185	275935	277699	SPCC16A11.05c	SPBC6B1.07	dim1	prp1	-	zer1	Two-hybrid	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250043	2540045	2541185	276583	277699	SPBC119.13c	SPBC6B1.07	prp31	prp1	-	zer1	Two-hybrid	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250044	2542201	2541347	278676	277858	SPAC17G8.03c	SPBP8B7.14c	dpb3	dpb2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Spiga MG (2004)	15388803	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250045	2542201	2540966	278676	277482	SPAC17G8.03c	SPBC3D6.09	dpb3	dpb4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Spiga MG (2004)	15388803	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250046	2540029	2543516	276573	279934	SPBC16A3.01	SPAC4F10.11	spn3	spn1	SPBC543.01c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	An H (2004)	15385632	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250047	2540029	2542193	276573	278668	SPBC16A3.01	SPAC9G1.11c	spn3	spn4	SPBC543.01c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	An H (2004)	15385632	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250048	2542193	2543516	278668	279934	SPAC9G1.11c	SPAC4F10.11	spn4	spn1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	An H (2004)	15385632	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250049	2542193	2543513	278668	279931	SPAC9G1.11c	SPAC821.06	spn4	spn2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	An H (2004)	15385632	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250050	2543513	2543516	279931	279934	SPAC821.06	SPAC4F10.11	spn2	spn1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	An H (2004)	15385632	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250051	2543516	2542193	279934	278668	SPAC4F10.11	SPAC9G1.11c	spn1	spn4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	An H (2004)	15385632	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250052	2542193	2543516	278668	279934	SPAC9G1.11c	SPAC4F10.11	spn4	spn1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	An H (2004)	15385632	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250053	2540029	2542193	276573	278668	SPBC16A3.01	SPAC9G1.11c	spn3	spn4	SPBC543.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	An H (2004)	15385632	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250054	2543516	2542193	279934	278668	SPAC4F10.11	SPAC9G1.11c	spn1	spn4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	An H (2004)	15385632	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250055	2543516	2543513	279934	279931	SPAC4F10.11	SPAC821.06	spn1	spn2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	An H (2004)	15385632	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250056	2543513	2542193	279931	278668	SPAC821.06	SPAC9G1.11c	spn2	spn4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	An H (2004)	15385632	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250057	2543516	2543516	279934	279934	SPAC4F10.11	SPAC4F10.11	spn1	spn1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	An H (2004)	15385632	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250058	2543513	2543513	279931	279931	SPAC821.06	SPAC821.06	spn2	spn2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	An H (2004)	15385632	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250059	2540029	2540029	276573	276573	SPBC16A3.01	SPBC16A3.01	spn3	spn3	SPBC543.01c	SPBC543.01c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	An H (2004)	15385632	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250060	2542193	2542193	278668	278668	SPAC9G1.11c	SPAC9G1.11c	spn4	spn4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	An H (2004)	15385632	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250061	2542193	2543513	278668	279931	SPAC9G1.11c	SPAC821.06	spn4	spn2	-	-	Co-localization	physical	An H (2004)	15385632	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250062	2543516	2542193	279934	278668	SPAC4F10.11	SPAC9G1.11c	spn1	spn4	-	-	Co-localization	physical	An H (2004)	15385632	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250063	2543516	2540029	279934	276573	SPAC4F10.11	SPBC16A3.01	spn1	spn3	-	SPBC543.01c	Co-localization	physical	An H (2004)	15385632	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250064	2543583	2542684	279998	279137	SPAC644.12	SPAC26A3.08	cdc5	smb1	-	smb	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250065	2543583	2542690	279998	279143	SPAC644.12	SPAC27D7.07c	cdc5	smd1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250066	2543583	2542480	279998	278940	SPAC644.12	SPAC2C4.03c	cdc5	smd2	-	cwf9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250067	2543583	2540884	279998	277401	SPAC644.12	SPBC19C2.14	cdc5	smd3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250068	2543583	2540330	279998	276860	SPAC644.12	SPBC3E7.14	cdc5	smf1	-	SPBC4F6.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250069	2543583	2540855	279998	277372	SPAC644.12	SPBC4B4.05	cdc5	smg1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250070	2543583	2540932	279998	277448	SPAC644.12	SPBC36.09	cdc5	sap61	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250071	2543583	2540622	279998	277148	SPAC644.12	SPBC21C3.05	cdc5	sap62	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250072	2543583	2541437	279998	277942	SPAC644.12	SPAC22A12.09c	cdc5	sap114	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250073	2543583	2541609	279998	278106	SPAC644.12	SPAC22F8.10c	cdc5	sap145	-	SF3b145	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250074	2543583	2543278	279998	279706	SPAC644.12	SPAPJ698.03c	cdc5	prp12	-	sap130|SF3b130	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250075	2543583	2541619	279998	278116	SPAC644.12	SPAC27F1.09c	cdc5	prp10	-	sap155|SF3b155	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250076	2543583	2541219	279998	277733	SPAC644.12	SPBC8D2.09c	cdc5	msl1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250077	2543583	2541212	279998	277726	SPAC644.12	SPBC887.05c	cdc5	cwf29	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250078	2543583	2543413	279998	279835	SPAC644.12	SPAC4F8.12c	cdc5	spp42	-	cwf6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250079	2543583	2543676	279998	280090	SPAC644.12	SPAC9.03c	cdc5	brr2	-	spp41	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250080	2543583	2540711	279998	277234	SPAC644.12	SPBC215.12	cdc5	cwf10	-	snu114|spef2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250081	2543583	2539984	279998	276528	SPAC644.12	SPBC1289.11	cdc5	spf38	-	cwf17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250082	2543583	2543583	279998	279998	SPAC644.12	SPAC644.12	cdc5	cdc5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250083	2543583	3361260	279998	280336	SPAC644.12	SPBP22H7.07	cdc5	prp5	-	cwf1|pi024|SPACTOKYO_453.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250084	2543583	2542531	279998	278989	SPAC644.12	SPAC3A12.11c	cdc5	cwf2	-	prp3|cwc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250085	2543583	2540753	279998	277274	SPAC644.12	SPBC211.02c	cdc5	cwf3	-	syf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250086	2543583	2540328	279998	276858	SPAC644.12	SPBC31F10.11c	cdc5	cwf4	-	syf3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250087	2543583	2540585	279998	277111	SPAC644.12	SPBC28F2.04c	cdc5	cwf7	-	spf27	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250088	2543583	2542256	279998	278726	SPAC644.12	SPAC29A4.08c	cdc5	prp19	-	cwf8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250089	2543583	2540230	279998	276762	SPAC644.12	SPBC32F12.05c	cdc5	cwf12	-	isy1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250090	2543583	2538988	279998	275562	SPAC644.12	SPCC188.11	cdc5	prp45	-	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250091	2543583	2540611	279998	277137	SPAC644.12	SPBC3E7.13c	cdc5	syf2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250092	2543583	2540941	279998	277457	SPAC644.12	SPBC365.05c	cdc5	slu7	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250093	2543583	2538974	279998	275548	SPAC644.12	SPCC550.02c	cdc5	cwf5	-	ecm2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250094	2543583	2541168	279998	277683	SPAC644.12	SPBC6B1.10	cdc5	prp17	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250095	2543583	2542978	279998	279416	SPAC644.12	SPAC10F6.02c	cdc5	prp22	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250096	2543583	2541124	279998	277639	SPAC644.12	SPBC646.02	cdc5	cwf11	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250097	2543583	2540983	279998	277499	SPAC644.12	SPBC337.06c	cdc5	cwf15	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250098	2543583	2543616	279998	280030	SPAC644.12	SPAC4A8.09c	cdc5	cwf21	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250099	2543583	2540186	279998	276719	SPAC644.12	SPBC13E7.02	cdc5	cwf24	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250100	2543583	2540067	279998	276605	SPAC644.12	SPBC16H5.05c	cdc5	cyp7	-	cwf27	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250101	2543583	2540302	279998	276832	SPAC644.12	SPBC3B9.02c	cdc5	cwf28	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250102	2543583	2540434	279998	276962	SPAC644.12	SPBC24C6.11	cdc5	cwf14	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250103	2543583	3361543	279998	280619	SPAC644.12	SPAC9.13c	cdc5	cwf16	-	SPAPJ735.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250104	2543583	2538901	279998	275479	SPAC644.12	SPCP1E11.07c	cdc5	cwf18	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250105	2543583	2543189	279998	279618	SPAC644.12	SPAC30D11.09	cdc5	cwf19	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250106	2543583	2539503	279998	276066	SPAC644.12	SPCC4B3.14	cdc5	cwf20	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250107	2541185	2542684	277699	279137	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC26A3.08	prp1	smb1	zer1	smb	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250108	2541185	2542690	277699	279143	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC27D7.07c	prp1	smd1	zer1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250109	2541185	2542480	277699	278940	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC2C4.03c	prp1	smd2	zer1	cwf9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250110	2541185	2540884	277699	277401	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC19C2.14	prp1	smd3	zer1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250111	2541185	2539607	277699	276165	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC11G11.06c	prp1	sme1	zer1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250112	2541185	2540330	277699	276860	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC3E7.14	prp1	smf1	zer1	SPBC4F6.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250113	2541185	2540855	277699	277372	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC4B4.05	prp1	smg1	zer1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250114	2541185	2541219	277699	277733	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC8D2.09c	prp1	msl1	zer1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250115	2541185	2540932	277699	277448	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC36.09	prp1	sap61	zer1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250116	2541185	2540622	277699	277148	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC21C3.05	prp1	sap62	zer1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250117	2541185	2541437	277699	277942	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC22A12.09c	prp1	sap114	zer1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250118	2541185	2542426	277699	278888	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC31G5.01	prp1	sap49	zer1	SPAPB1A11.05|SF3b49	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250119	2541185	2541609	277699	278106	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC22F8.10c	prp1	sap145	zer1	SF3b145	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250120	2541185	2543278	277699	279706	SPBC6B1.07	SPAPJ698.03c	prp1	prp12	zer1	sap130|SF3b130	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250121	2541185	2541619	277699	278116	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC27F1.09c	prp1	prp10	zer1	sap155|SF3b155	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250122	2541185	2540462	277699	276990	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC29A3.07c	prp1	sap14	zer1	sab14|SF3b14a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250123	2541185	2543413	277699	279835	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC4F8.12c	prp1	spp42	zer1	cwf6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250124	2541185	2543676	277699	280090	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC9.03c	prp1	brr2	zer1	spp41	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250125	2541185	2540711	277699	277234	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC215.12	prp1	cwf10	zer1	snu114|spef2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250126	2541185	2539984	277699	276528	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC1289.11	prp1	spf38	zer1	cwf17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250127	2541185	2541185	277699	277699	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC6B1.07	prp1	prp1	zer1	zer1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250128	2541185	2541686	277699	278182	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC29E6.02	prp1	prp3	zer1	SPAC30.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250129	2541185	2541477	277699	277979	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC227.12	prp1	rna4	zer1	SPAC227.12|prp4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250130	2541185	2542774	277699	279223	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC167.03c	prp1	snu66	zer1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250131	2541185	2540045	277699	276583	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC119.13c	prp1	prp31	zer1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250132	2541185	2538711	277699	275295	SPBC6B1.07	SPCC1281.02c	prp1	spf30	zer1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250133	2541185	2538689	277699	275274	SPBC6B1.07	SPCC1795.11	prp1	sum3	zer1	ded1|moc2|slh3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250134	2541185	2539369	277699	275935	SPBC6B1.07	SPCC16A11.05c	prp1	dim1	zer1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Carnahan RH (2005)	15755920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250135	2539360	2539513	275926	276075	SPCC613.04c	SPCC645.05c	rng3	myo2	-	rng5	Two-hybrid	physical	Mishra M (2005)	15755919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250136	2539513	2539360	276075	275926	SPCC645.05c	SPCC613.04c	myo2	rng3	rng5	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Mishra M (2005)	15755919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250137	2539360	2543539	275926	279956	SPCC613.04c	SPAC926.04c	rng3	hsp90	-	git10|swo1	Two-hybrid	physical	Mishra M (2005)	15755919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250138	2539513	2543539	276075	279956	SPCC645.05c	SPAC926.04c	myo2	hsp90	rng5	git10|swo1	Two-hybrid	physical	Mishra M (2005)	15755919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250139	2543539	2539513	279956	276075	SPAC926.04c	SPCC645.05c	hsp90	myo2	git10|swo1	rng5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mishra M (2005)	15755919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250140	2539360	2539513	275926	276075	SPCC613.04c	SPCC645.05c	rng3	myo2	-	rng5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mishra M (2005)	15755919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250141	2543482	2540494	279902	277022	SPAC688.02c	SPBC409.04c	mis14	mis12	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hayashi T (2004)	15369671	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250142	2541321	2542304	277833	278771	SPBP22H7.09c	SPAC1687.20c	mis15	mis6	pi022|SPACTOKYO_453.12	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hayashi T (2004)	15369671	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250143	3361327	2542304	280403	278771	SPBC21.01	SPAC1687.20c	mis17	mis6	SPBC776.19	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hayashi T (2004)	15369671	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250145	2538763	2539214	275346	275784	SPCC970.12	SPCC1672.10	mis18	mis16	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hayashi T (2004)	15369671	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250146	2540292	2541446	276823	277951	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC23G3.01	rpb1	rpb2	-	SPAC521.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi K (2005)	15743411	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250147	2540292	2538816	276823	275397	SPBC28F2.12	SPCC1442.10c	rpb1	rpb3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi K (2005)	15743411	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250148	2540292	2541011	276823	277526	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC337.14	rpb1	rpb4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi K (2005)	15743411	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250149	2540292	2541910	276823	278400	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC23C4.15	rpb1	rpb5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi K (2005)	15743411	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250150	2540292	2539083	276823	275655	SPBC28F2.12	SPCC1020.04c	rpb1	rpb6	-	rpo15	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi K (2005)	15743411	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250151	2540292	2542097	276823	278573	SPBC28F2.12	SPACUNK4.06c	rpb1	rpb7	-	SPAPYUK71.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi K (2005)	15743411	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250152	2540292	2539794	276823	276344	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC14C8.12	rpb1	rpb8	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi K (2005)	15743411	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250153	2540292	2541470	276823	277972	SPBC28F2.12	SPAPYUG7.04c	rpb1	rpb9	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi K (2005)	15743411	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250154	2540292	2542233	276823	278705	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC1B3.12c	rpb1	rpb10	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi K (2005)	15743411	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250155	2540292	2543112	276823	279544	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC3A12.07	rpb1	rpb11	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi K (2005)	15743411	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250156	2540292	2540793	276823	277312	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC19C2.03	rpb1	rpc10	-	rpb12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi K (2005)	15743411	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250161	2541910	2543627	278400	280041	SPAC23C4.15	SPAC458.07	rpb5	tfa1	-	SPAPYUG7.01	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hayashi K (2005)	15743411	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250162	2540793	2543627	277312	280041	SPBC19C2.03	SPAC458.07	rpc10	tfa1	rpb12	SPAPYUG7.01	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hayashi K (2005)	15743411	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250164	2540793	2539924	277312	276468	SPBC19C2.03	SPBC1198.13c	rpc10	tfg2	rpb12	SPBC660.03c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hayashi K (2005)	15743411	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250165	2541910	2539924	278400	276468	SPAC23C4.15	SPBC1198.13c	rpb5	tfg2	-	SPBC660.03c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hayashi K (2005)	15743411	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250166	2540494	2542004	277022	278487	SPBC409.04c	SPAC27F1.04c	mis12	nuf2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Asakawa H (2005)	15728720	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250167	2542304	2542004	278771	278487	SPAC1687.20c	SPAC27F1.04c	mis6	nuf2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Asakawa H (2005)	15728720	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250168	2542004	2542004	278487	278487	SPAC27F1.04c	SPAC27F1.04c	nuf2	nuf2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Asakawa H (2005)	15728720	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250169	2542004	2540097	278487	276635	SPAC27F1.04c	SPBC11C11.03	nuf2	ndc80	-	ndc10|tid3	Two-hybrid	physical	Asakawa H (2005)	15728720	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250170	2540097	2542004	276635	278487	SPBC11C11.03	SPAC27F1.04c	ndc80	nuf2	ndc10|tid3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Asakawa H (2005)	15728720	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250171	2540097	2540238	276635	276770	SPBC11C11.03	SPBC336.08	ndc80	spc24	ndc10|tid3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Asakawa H (2005)	15728720	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250172	2540238	2540097	276770	276635	SPBC336.08	SPBC11C11.03	spc24	ndc80	-	ndc10|tid3	Two-hybrid	physical	Asakawa H (2005)	15728720	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250173	2540238	2540238	276770	276770	SPBC336.08	SPBC336.08	spc24	spc24	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Asakawa H (2005)	15728720	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250174	2540238	2539200	276770	275771	SPBC336.08	SPCC188.04c	spc24	spc25	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Asakawa H (2005)	15728720	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250175	2539200	2540238	275771	276770	SPCC188.04c	SPBC336.08	spc25	spc24	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Asakawa H (2005)	15728720	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250176	2540097	2542004	276635	278487	SPBC11C11.03	SPAC27F1.04c	ndc80	nuf2	ndc10|tid3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Asakawa H (2005)	15728720	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250177	2540097	2540238	276635	276770	SPBC11C11.03	SPBC336.08	ndc80	spc24	ndc10|tid3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Asakawa H (2005)	15728720	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250178	2540097	2539200	276635	275771	SPBC11C11.03	SPCC188.04c	ndc80	spc25	ndc10|tid3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Asakawa H (2005)	15728720	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250179	2541652	2540258	278148	276789	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC32C12.02	sty1	ste11	phh1|spc1	aff1|stex	Two-hybrid	physical	Kjaerulff S (2005)	15713656	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250180	2542474	2540258	278934	276789	SPAC31G5.09c	SPBC32C12.02	spk1	ste11	-	aff1|stex	Two-hybrid	physical	Kjaerulff S (2005)	15713656	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250181	2542474	2540258	278934	276789	SPAC31G5.09c	SPBC32C12.02	spk1	ste11	-	aff1|stex	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kjaerulff S (2005)	15713656	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250183	2540728	3361323	277251	280399	SPBC216.06c	SPBC30D10.04	swi1	swi3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Noguchi E (2004)	15367656	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250184	3361323	2540728	280399	277251	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC216.06c	swi3	swi1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Noguchi E (2004)	15367656	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250185	2541011	2542097	277526	278573	SPBC337.14	SPACUNK4.06c	rpb4	rpb7	-	SPAPYUK71.02	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Armache KJ (2005)	15591044	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250186	2539020	2541587	275593	278084	SPCC5E4.06	SPAC14C4.02c	smc6	smc5	rad18	spr18	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Sergeant J (2005)	15601840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250187	2539020	2541587	275593	278084	SPCC5E4.06	SPAC14C4.02c	smc6	smc5	rad18	spr18	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sergeant J (2005)	15601840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250188	2539020	2539436	275593	275999	SPCC5E4.06	SPCC645.04	smc6	nse3	rad18	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sergeant J (2005)	15601840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250189	2539020	3361330	275593	280406	SPCC5E4.06	SPBC20F10.04c	smc6	nse4	rad18	rad62	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sergeant J (2005)	15601840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250190	2539020	2542312	275593	278778	SPCC5E4.06	SPAC16A10.06c	smc6	nse2	rad18	pli2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sergeant J (2005)	15601840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250191	2539020	2539550	275593	276111	SPCC5E4.06	SPCC550.05	smc6	nse1	rad18	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sergeant J (2005)	15601840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250192	2542312	2541587	278778	278084	SPAC16A10.06c	SPAC14C4.02c	nse2	smc5	pli2	spr18	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Sergeant J (2005)	15601840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250193	2539550	2539436	276111	275999	SPCC550.05	SPCC645.04	nse1	nse3	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Sergeant J (2005)	15601840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250194	3361330	2539436	280406	275999	SPBC20F10.04c	SPCC645.04	nse4	nse3	rad62	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Sergeant J (2005)	15601840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250195	2539627	2542083	276184	278560	SPBC1734.02c	SPAC27E2.05	cdc27	cdc1	SPBC337.18c	mis1	Two-hybrid	physical	Gray FC (2004)	15579205	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250196	2539627	2540020	276184	276564	SPBC1734.02c	SPBC16D10.09	cdc27	pcn1	SPBC337.18c	pcn	Two-hybrid	physical	Gray FC (2004)	15579205	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250197	2539627	2543629	276184	280043	SPBC1734.02c	SPAC3H5.06c	cdc27	pol1	SPBC337.18c	polA|swi7	Two-hybrid	physical	Gray FC (2004)	15579205	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250198	2543629	2539627	280043	276184	SPAC3H5.06c	SPBC1734.02c	pol1	cdc27	polA|swi7	SPBC337.18c	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Gray FC (2004)	15579205	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250200	2539773	2540294	276324	276825	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC31F10.04c	med7	srb4	-	med17	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Linder T (2004)	15356001	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250201	2539773	2539504	276324	276067	SPBC14F5.08	SPCP31B10.03c	med7	med31	-	sep10|soh1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Linder T (2004)	15356001	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250202	2539770	2542007	276321	278490	SPBC1685.11	SPAC20H4.07	rlp1	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Khasanov FK (2004)	15336631	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250203	2541587	2539020	278084	275593	SPAC14C4.02c	SPCC5E4.06	smc5	smc6	spr18	rad18	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pebernard S (2004)	15331764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250204	2541587	3361330	278084	280406	SPAC14C4.02c	SPBC20F10.04c	smc5	nse4	spr18	rad62	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pebernard S (2004)	15331764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250205	2541587	2539436	278084	275999	SPAC14C4.02c	SPCC645.04	smc5	nse3	spr18	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pebernard S (2004)	15331764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250206	2541587	2539550	278084	276111	SPAC14C4.02c	SPCC550.05	smc5	nse1	spr18	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pebernard S (2004)	15331764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250207	2541587	2542312	278084	278778	SPAC14C4.02c	SPAC16A10.06c	smc5	nse2	spr18	pli2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pebernard S (2004)	15331764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250208	2541587	2539436	278084	275999	SPAC14C4.02c	SPCC645.04	smc5	nse3	spr18	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Pebernard S (2004)	15331764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250209	2539550	2539436	276111	275999	SPCC550.05	SPCC645.04	nse1	nse3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Pebernard S (2004)	15331764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250210	2542312	2539436	278778	275999	SPAC16A10.06c	SPCC645.04	nse2	nse3	pli2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Pebernard S (2004)	15331764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250211	2539550	2541144	276111	277659	SPCC550.05	SPBC685.06	nse1	rps001	-	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Two-hybrid	physical	Pebernard S (2004)	15331764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250212	2539550	2539764	276111	276315	SPCC550.05	SPBC14F5.04c	nse1	pgk1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Pebernard S (2004)	15331764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250213	2539550	2539389	276111	275954	SPCC550.05	SPCC1827.05c	nse1	SPCC1827.05c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Pebernard S (2004)	15331764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250214	2539550	2542556	276111	279013	SPCC550.05	SPAC6G10.07	nse1	cbc1	-	SPAC6G10.07	Two-hybrid	physical	Pebernard S (2004)	15331764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250215	2539550	2539436	276111	275999	SPCC550.05	SPCC645.04	nse1	nse3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Pebernard S (2004)	15331764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250216	2540148	2543407	276685	279829	SPBC16D10.04c	SPAC8F11.07c	dna2	cdc24	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tanaka H (2004)	15576681	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250217	2542029	2539087	278511	275659	SPAC8E11.02c	SPCC1259.13	rad24	chk1	anr5|sam4	rad27	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dunaway S (2005)	15585577	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250218	2540589	2543222	277115	279650	SPBC20F10.06	SPAC821.08c	mad2	slp1	-	cdc20	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sugimoto I (2004)	15347659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250219	2541264	2539467	277778	276030	SPBC902.06	SPCC417.07c	mto2	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Samejima I (2005)	15659644	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250220	2539467	2541264	276030	277778	SPCC417.07c	SPBC902.06	mto1	mto2	mbo1|mod20	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Samejima I (2005)	15659644	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250221	2540470	2542266	276998	278735	SPBC29A10.15	SPAC17D4.02	orc1	cdc45	cdc30|orp1|rid1	goa1|sna41	Co-localization	physical	Dolan WP (2004)	15338237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250222	2539467	2540392	276030	276920	SPCC417.07c	SPBC365.15	mto1	alp4	mbo1|mod20	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Samejima I (2005)	15659644	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250223	2540620	2542266	277146	278735	SPBC4.04c	SPAC17D4.02	mcm2	cdc45	cdc19|nda1	goa1|sna41	Co-localization	physical	Dolan WP (2004)	15338237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250224	2539164	2542266	275735	278735	SPCC16A11.17	SPAC17D4.02	mcm4	cdc45	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	goa1|sna41	Co-localization	physical	Dolan WP (2004)	15338237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250225	2541165	2542266	277680	278735	SPBC776.12c	SPAC17D4.02	hsk1	cdc45	cdc7	goa1|sna41	Co-localization	physical	Dolan WP (2004)	15338237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250226	2543402	2542299	279824	278766	SPAC630.14c	SPAC18B11.10	tup12	tup11	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Fagerstroem-Billai F (2005)	15632072	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250227	2543281	2542266	279708	278735	SPAC23C4.18c	SPAC17D4.02	rad4	cdc45	cut5|dpb11|dre3	goa1|sna41	Co-localization	physical	Dolan WP (2004)	15338237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250228	2540656	2542299	277181	278766	SPBC23E6.09	SPAC18B11.10	ssn6	tup11	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Fagerstroem-Billai F (2005)	15632072	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250229	2540656	2543402	277181	279824	SPBC23E6.09	SPAC630.14c	ssn6	tup12	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Fagerstroem-Billai F (2005)	15632072	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250230	2540989	2539675	277505	276230	SPBC3B9.07c	SPBC1718.03	rpa43	ker1	rpa21	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Imazawa Y (2005)	15647272	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250231	2539675	2540989	276230	277505	SPBC1718.03	SPBC3B9.07c	ker1	rpa43	-	rpa21	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Imazawa Y (2005)	15647272	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250232	2540989	2539675	277505	276230	SPBC3B9.07c	SPBC1718.03	rpa43	ker1	rpa21	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Imazawa Y (2005)	15647272	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250233	2543387	2543629	279809	280043	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC3H5.06c	mcl1	pol1	slr3	polA|swi7	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Williams DR (2005)	15643072	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250234	2543387	2543629	279809	280043	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC3H5.06c	mcl1	pol1	slr3	polA|swi7	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Williams DR (2005)	15643072	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250235	2543387	2541165	279809	277680	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC776.12c	mcl1	hsk1	slr3	cdc7	Co-localization	physical	Williams DR (2005)	15643072	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250236	2543387	2538959	279809	275533	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC18B5.11c	mcl1	cds1	slr3	-	Co-localization	physical	Williams DR (2005)	15643072	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250237	2542632	2539027	279086	275600	SPAC24H6.05	SPCC1322.08	cdc25	srk1	sal2	mkp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lopez-Aviles S (2005)	15629716	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250238	2542097	2540547	278573	277074	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC32F12.11	rpb7	tdh1	SPAPYUK71.02	gpd1	Two-hybrid	physical	Mitsuzawa H (2005)	15620689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250239	2542097	2540975	278573	277491	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC354.12	rpb7	gpd3	SPAPYUK71.02	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Two-hybrid	physical	Mitsuzawa H (2005)	15620689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250240	2542097	2540051	278573	276589	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC32H8.12c	rpb7	act1	SPAPYUK71.02	cps8|pi012	Two-hybrid	physical	Mitsuzawa H (2005)	15620689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250241	2542097	2540547	278573	277074	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC32F12.11	rpb7	tdh1	SPAPYUK71.02	gpd1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Mitsuzawa H (2005)	15620689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250242	2542097	2540051	278573	276589	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC32H8.12c	rpb7	act1	SPAPYUK71.02	cps8|pi012	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Mitsuzawa H (2005)	15620689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250243	2540389	2542774	276917	279223	SPBC31E1.03	SPAC167.03c	hub1	snu66	ubl4	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Wilkinson CR (2004)	15620657	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250244	2540389	2542774	276917	279223	SPBC31E1.03	SPAC167.03c	hub1	snu66	ubl4	-	Co-localization	physical	Wilkinson CR (2004)	15620657	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250245	2541729	2541729	278223	278223	SPAC22H12.02	SPAC22H12.02	tfg3	tfg3	taf14	taf14	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimura M (2004)	15616156	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250246	2541729	2539294	278223	275862	SPAC22H12.02	SPCC1620.09c	tfg3	tfg1	taf14	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimura M (2004)	15616156	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250247	2541729	2539924	278223	276468	SPAC22H12.02	SPBC1198.13c	tfg3	tfg2	taf14	SPBC660.03c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimura M (2004)	15616156	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250248	2539353	2541729	275919	278223	SPCC5E4.03c	SPAC22H12.02	taf5	tfg3	taf72	taf14	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimura M (2004)	15616156	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250249	2539882	2541729	276428	278223	SPBC15D4.14	SPAC22H12.02	taf73	tfg3	taf5|taf5l	taf14	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimura M (2004)	15616156	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250250	2542225	2539924	278698	276468	SPAC19B12.05c	SPBC1198.13c	fcp1	tfg2	-	SPBC660.03c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimura M (2004)	15616156	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250251	2542225	2539294	278698	275862	SPAC19B12.05c	SPCC1620.09c	fcp1	tfg1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimura M (2004)	15616156	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250252	2539963	2540633	276507	277159	SPBC17F3.02	SPBC21D10.12	nak1	hob1	mor4|orb3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Huang TY (2005)	15615784	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250253	2543589	2540633	280004	277159	SPAC4F10.15c	SPBC21D10.12	wsp1	hob1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Huang TY (2005)	15615784	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250254	2540633	2543589	277159	280004	SPBC21D10.12	SPAC4F10.15c	hob1	wsp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Huang TY (2005)	15615784	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250255	2543589	2539963	280004	276507	SPAC4F10.15c	SPBC17F3.02	wsp1	nak1	-	mor4|orb3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Huang TY (2005)	15615784	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250256	2542256	2542256	278726	278726	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAC29A4.08c	prp19	prp19	cwf8	cwf8	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ohi MD (2005)	15601865	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250257	2542539	2539248	278996	275818	SPAC1B1.01	SPCC1739.03	deb1	hrr1	rdp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Motamedi MR (2004)	15607976	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250258	2539248	2542539	275818	278996	SPCC1739.03	SPAC1B1.01	hrr1	deb1	-	rdp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Motamedi MR (2004)	15607976	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250259	2542539	2539423	278996	275988	SPAC1B1.01	SPCC663.12	deb1	cid12	rdp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Motamedi MR (2004)	15607976	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250260	2539423	2542539	275988	278996	SPCC663.12	SPAC1B1.01	cid12	deb1	-	rdp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Motamedi MR (2004)	15607976	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250261	2539248	2539423	275818	275988	SPCC1739.03	SPCC663.12	hrr1	cid12	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Motamedi MR (2004)	15607976	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250262	2539423	2539248	275988	275818	SPCC663.12	SPCC1739.03	cid12	hrr1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Motamedi MR (2004)	15607976	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250263	2539403	2539248	275968	275818	SPCC736.11	SPCC1739.03	ago1	hrr1	csp9	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Motamedi MR (2004)	15607976	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250264	2542239	2539403	278711	275968	SPAC18G6.02c	SPCC736.11	chp1	ago1	-	csp9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Motamedi MR (2004)	15607976	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250265	2542239	2540735	278711	277258	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC83.03c	chp1	tas3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Motamedi MR (2004)	15607976	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250266	2542239	2542539	278711	278996	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC1B1.01	chp1	deb1	-	rdp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Motamedi MR (2004)	15607976	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250267	2542539	2542239	278996	278711	SPAC1B1.01	SPAC18G6.02c	deb1	chp1	rdp1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Motamedi MR (2004)	15607976	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250268	2540219	2540128	276752	276665	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC15D4.03	hip1	slm9	hir1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Greenall A (2006)	16428807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250269	2540128	2540219	276665	276752	SPBC15D4.03	SPBC31F10.13c	slm9	hip1	-	hir1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Greenall A (2006)	16428807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250270	2540219	2540227	276752	276759	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC31F10.14c	hip1	hip3	hir1	hir3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Greenall A (2006)	16428807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250271	2540128	2540227	276665	276759	SPBC15D4.03	SPBC31F10.14c	slm9	hip3	-	hir3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Greenall A (2006)	16428807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250272	2540219	2540227	276752	276759	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC31F10.14c	hip1	hip3	hir1	hir3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Greenall A (2006)	16428807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250273	2540128	2540227	276665	276759	SPBC15D4.03	SPBC31F10.14c	slm9	hip3	-	hir3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Greenall A (2006)	16428807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250274	2540239	2540237	276771	276769	SPBC32H8.10	SPBC32F12.06	cdk9	pch1	SPACTOKYO_453.22	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pei Y (2006)	16428435	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250275	2540239	2539280	276771	275848	SPBC32H8.10	SPCC330.10	cdk9	pcm1	SPACTOKYO_453.22	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pei Y (2006)	16428435	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250276	2541033	2542503	277548	278961	SPBC3B9.21	SPAC19A8.12	dcp1	dcp2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	She M (2006)	16341225	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250277	2541033	2542503	277548	278961	SPBC3B9.21	SPAC19A8.12	dcp1	dcp2	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	She M (2006)	16341225	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250278	2542151	2539823	278627	276373	SPAC17A2.09c	SPBC16A3.18	csx1	cip1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Martin V (2006)	16407405	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250279	2542151	2543139	278627	279571	SPAC17A2.09c	SPAC12G12.03	csx1	cip2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Martin V (2006)	16407405	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250280	2540880	2539869	277397	276415	SPBC582.03	SPBC11B10.09	cdc13	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Turnbull EL (2006)	16390871	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250281	2541293	2539869	277805	276415	SPBC9B6.10	SPBC11B10.09	cdc37	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Turnbull EL (2006)	16390871	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250282	2540149	2541059	276686	277574	SPBC1289.03c	SPBC557.03c	spi1	pim1	-	dcd1|ptr2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Hirose E (2006)	16371130	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250283	2542808	2540458	279256	276986	SPAC15E1.07c	SPBC29A10.14	moa1	rec8	mug159	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yokobayashi S (2005)	16325576	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250284	2542808	2540458	279256	276986	SPAC15E1.07c	SPBC29A10.14	moa1	rec8	mug159	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Yokobayashi S (2005)	16325576	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250285	2541612	2539580	278109	276139	SPAC1F7.04	SPCC645.07	rho1	rgf1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Mutoh T (2005)	16324155	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250286	2541612	2542953	278109	279393	SPAC1F7.04	SPAC1006.06	rho1	rgf2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Mutoh T (2005)	16324155	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250287	2539920	2542175	276464	278650	SPBC119.08	SPAC1F3.02c	pmk1	mkh1	spm1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Madrid M (2006)	16291757	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250288	2539920	2540919	276464	277435	SPBC119.08	SPBC543.07	pmk1	pek1	spm1	mkk1|skh1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Madrid M (2006)	16291757	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250289	2541089	2539938	277604	276482	SPBC646.09c	SPBC17D11.05	int6	tif32	yin6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jenkins CC (2005)	16278451	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250290	2541089	2542090	277604	278567	SPBC646.09c	SPAC25G10.08	int6	SPAC25G10.08	yin6	p116	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jenkins CC (2005)	16278451	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250291	2541089	2543621	277604	280035	SPBC646.09c	SPAC4A8.16c	int6	tif33	yin6	SPAC823.01c|SPAC1E11.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jenkins CC (2005)	16278451	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250292	2541089	2543412	277604	279834	SPBC646.09c	SPAC637.07	int6	moe1	yin6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jenkins CC (2005)	16278451	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250293	2541089	2540819	277604	277337	SPBC646.09c	SPBC18H10.03	int6	tif35	yin6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jenkins CC (2005)	16278451	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250294	2541089	2539225	277604	275795	SPBC646.09c	SPCC1739.13	int6	ssa2	yin6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jenkins CC (2005)	16278451	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250295	2543646	2539958	280060	276502	SPAC821.07c	SPBC1718.07c	moc3	zfs1	-	moc4	Two-hybrid	physical	Goldar MM (2005)	16273369	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250299	2540728	2541165	277251	277680	SPBC216.06c	SPBC776.12c	swi1	hsk1	-	cdc7	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Matsumoto S (2005)	16263721	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250300	2540620	2540728	277146	277251	SPBC4.04c	SPBC216.06c	mcm2	swi1	cdc19|nda1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Matsumoto S (2005)	16263721	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250301	2540720	2540853	277243	277370	SPBC216.07c	SPBC428.16c	tor2	rhb1	SPBC646.01c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Urano J (2005)	16262791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250302	2543446	2543390	279866	279812	SPAC4F8.10c	SPAC631.01c	stg1	acp2	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Nakano K (2005)	16256112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250303	2543446	2542679	279866	279132	SPAC4F8.10c	SPAC12B10.07	stg1	acp1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Nakano K (2005)	16256112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250304	2540352	2542374	276881	278838	SPBC215.03c	SPAC17H9.19c	csn1	cdt2	-	sev1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Liu C (2005)	16252005	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250305	2542207	2542374	278682	278838	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC17H9.19c	ddb1	cdt2	-	sev1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Liu C (2005)	16252005	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250306	2540352	2542207	276881	278682	SPBC215.03c	SPAC17H9.10c	csn1	ddb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Liu C (2005)	16252005	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250307	2542374	2542207	278838	278682	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC17H9.10c	cdt2	ddb1	sev1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu C (2005)	16252005	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250308	2542374	2543116	278838	279548	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC3A11.08	cdt2	pcu4	sev1	Cul-4|cul4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu C (2005)	16252005	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250309	2542374	2540129	278838	276666	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC12D12.08c	cdt2	ned8	sev1	SPBC24C6.01c|nedd8|ubl1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu C (2005)	16252005	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250310	2542374	2540572	278838	277099	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC25H2.12c	cdt2	cct7	sev1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu C (2005)	16252005	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250311	2542374	2539691	278838	276245	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC12D12.03	cdt2	cct1	sev1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu C (2005)	16252005	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250312	2542374	2541128	278838	277643	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC646.11	cdt2	cct6	sev1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu C (2005)	16252005	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250313	2542374	3361420	278838	280496	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAPB17E12.04c	cdt2	csn2	sev1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu C (2005)	16252005	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250314	2542374	2540053	278838	276591	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC106.06	cdt2	cct4	sev1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu C (2005)	16252005	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250315	2542374	2540352	278838	276881	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC215.03c	cdt2	csn1	sev1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu C (2005)	16252005	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250316	2542374	2541517	278838	278018	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC22A12.03c	cdt2	csn4	sev1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu C (2005)	16252005	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250317	2542696	2542374	279149	278838	SPAC29B12.03	SPAC17H9.19c	spd1	cdt2	-	sev1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Liu C (2005)	16252005	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250318	2541633	2540821	278129	277339	SPAC664.01c	SPBC800.03	swi6	clr3	SPAC824.10c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yamada T (2005)	16246721	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250319	2540821	2541633	277339	278129	SPBC800.03	SPAC664.01c	clr3	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yamada T (2005)	16246721	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250320	2540894	2539047	277410	275620	SPBC530.04	SPCC1223.06	mod5	tea1	-	alp8	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Snaith HA (2005)	16222337	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250321	2540894	2542619	277410	279073	SPBC530.04	SPAC6G10.02c	mod5	tea3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Snaith HA (2005)	16222337	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250322	2542619	2539047	279073	275620	SPAC6G10.02c	SPCC1223.06	tea3	tea1	-	alp8	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Snaith HA (2005)	16222337	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250323	2542097	2540292	278573	276823	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC28F2.12	rpb7	rpb1	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Djupedal I (2005)	16204182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250324	2542097	2541446	278573	277951	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC23G3.01	rpb7	rpb2	SPAPYUK71.02	SPAC521.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Djupedal I (2005)	16204182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250325	2542097	2538816	278573	275397	SPACUNK4.06c	SPCC1442.10c	rpb7	rpb3	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Djupedal I (2005)	16204182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250326	2542097	2541910	278573	278400	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC23C4.15	rpb7	rpb5	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Djupedal I (2005)	16204182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250327	2542097	2541011	278573	277526	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC337.14	rpb7	rpb4	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Djupedal I (2005)	16204182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250328	2542097	2539794	278573	276344	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC14C8.12	rpb7	rpb8	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Djupedal I (2005)	16204182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250329	2542097	2543112	278573	279544	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC3A12.07	rpb7	rpb11	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Djupedal I (2005)	16204182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250330	2542097	2540793	278573	277312	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC19C2.03	rpb7	rpc10	SPAPYUK71.02	rpb12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Djupedal I (2005)	16204182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250331	2542097	2542233	278573	278705	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC1B3.12c	rpb7	rpb10	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Djupedal I (2005)	16204182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250332	2542196	2541633	278671	278129	SPAC30D11.13	SPAC664.01c	hus5	swi6	ubc9	SPAC824.10c	Two-hybrid	physical	Shin JA (2005)	16168376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250333	2542196	2540825	278671	277343	SPAC30D11.13	SPBC428.08c	hus5	clr4	ubc9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Shin JA (2005)	16168376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250334	2541633	2542196	278129	278671	SPAC664.01c	SPAC30D11.13	swi6	hus5	SPAC824.10c	ubc9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Shin JA (2005)	16168376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250335	2542196	2540825	278671	277343	SPAC30D11.13	SPBC428.08c	hus5	clr4	ubc9	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Shin JA (2005)	16168376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250336	2539420	2543116	275985	279548	SPCC970.07c	SPAC3A11.08	raf2	pcu4	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Cul-4|cul4	Two-hybrid	physical	Thon G (2005)	16157682	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250337	2538848	2541547	275429	278047	SPCC613.12c	SPAC1486.05	raf1	nup189	clr8|cmc1|dos1	nup189C|nup189N|nup96|nup98	Two-hybrid	physical	Thon G (2005)	16157682	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250338	2543058	2540191	279492	276724	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC17D11.07c	rpn15	rpn2	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Josse L (2006)	16149916	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250339	2543058	2540109	279492	276646	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC119.01	rpn15	rpn3	dss1|sem1	SPBPJ4664.07	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Josse L (2006)	16149916	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250340	2543058	2538912	279492	275489	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC1682.10	rpn15	rpn8	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Josse L (2006)	16149916	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250341	2543058	2540956	279492	277472	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC409.06	rpn15	uch2	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Josse L (2006)	16149916	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250342	2543058	2543682	279492	280096	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC637.10c	rpn15	rpn10	dss1|sem1	pus1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Josse L (2006)	16149916	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250343	2543058	2540025	279492	276569	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC16G5.01	rpn15	rpn12	dss1|sem1	SPBC342.07|mts3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Josse L (2006)	16149916	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250344	2543058	2539539	279492	276101	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC576.10c	rpn15	rpt3	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Josse L (2006)	16149916	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250345	2543058	3361462	279492	280538	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC3A11.12c	rpn15	rpt5	dss1|sem1	pam2|tbp1|SPAC3H5.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Josse L (2006)	16149916	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250346	2543058	2540794	279492	277313	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC582.07c	rpn15	rpn7	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Josse L (2006)	16149916	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250347	2543058	2542615	279492	279069	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC19G12.01c	rpn15	cut20	dss1|sem1	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Josse L (2006)	16149916	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250348	2543058	2540939	279492	277455	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC4.07c	rpn15	rpt2	dss1|sem1	mts2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Josse L (2006)	16149916	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250349	2543058	2542919	279492	279360	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC6C3.08	rpn15	nas6	dss1|sem1	SPAC6C3.08	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Josse L (2006)	16149916	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250350	2543058	2542907	279492	279351	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC1420.03	rpn15	rpn501	dss1|sem1	rpn5|rpn5-a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Josse L (2006)	16149916	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250351	2543676	2541185	280090	277699	SPAC9.03c	SPBC6B1.07	brr2	prp1	spp41	zer1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bottner CA (2005)	16133344	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250352	2541185	2543676	277699	280090	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC9.03c	prp1	brr2	zer1	spp41	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bottner CA (2005)	16133344	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250353	2541185	2540045	277699	276583	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC119.13c	prp1	prp31	zer1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bottner CA (2005)	16133344	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250354	2540045	2541185	276583	277699	SPBC119.13c	SPBC6B1.07	prp31	prp1	-	zer1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bottner CA (2005)	16133344	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250355	2540825	2543116	277343	279548	SPBC428.08c	SPAC3A11.08	clr4	pcu4	-	Cul-4|cul4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jia S (2005)	16127433	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250356	2539050	2543116	275623	279548	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC3A11.08	rik1	pcu4	-	Cul-4|cul4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jia S (2005)	16127433	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250357	2541293	2543539	277805	279956	SPBC9B6.10	SPAC926.04c	cdc37	hsp90	-	git10|swo1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Turnbull EL (2005)	16098195	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250358	2539963	2542388	276507	278852	SPBC17F3.02	SPAC1834.06c	nak1	pmo25	mor4|orb3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Kanai M (2005)	16096637	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250359	2543441	2539963	279861	276507	SPAC821.12	SPBC17F3.02	orb6	nak1	-	mor4|orb3	Two-hybrid	physical	Kanai M (2005)	16096637	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250360	2539963	2541317	276507	277829	SPBC17F3.02	SPBP19A11.04c	nak1	mor2	mor4|orb3	cps12	Two-hybrid	physical	Kanai M (2005)	16096637	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250361	2543441	2541317	279861	277829	SPAC821.12	SPBP19A11.04c	orb6	mor2	-	cps12	Two-hybrid	physical	Kanai M (2005)	16096637	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250362	2539963	2542388	276507	278852	SPBC17F3.02	SPAC1834.06c	nak1	pmo25	mor4|orb3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kanai M (2005)	16096637	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250363	2542388	2539963	278852	276507	SPAC1834.06c	SPBC17F3.02	pmo25	nak1	-	mor4|orb3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kanai M (2005)	16096637	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250364	2541317	2543441	277829	279861	SPBP19A11.04c	SPAC821.12	mor2	orb6	cps12	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kanai M (2005)	16096637	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250365	2542388	2539963	278852	276507	SPAC1834.06c	SPBC17F3.02	pmo25	nak1	-	mor4|orb3	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kanai M (2005)	16096637	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250366	2542184	2540025	278659	276569	SPAC17C9.13c	SPBC16G5.01	cut8	rpn12	-	SPBC342.07|mts3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Takeda K (2005)	16096059	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250367	2542184	2543040	278659	279475	SPAC17C9.13c	SPAC31G5.13	cut8	rpn11	-	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Takeda K (2005)	16096059	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250368	2542184	2541268	278659	277782	SPAC17C9.13c	SPBP19A11.03c	cut8	mts4	-	rpn1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Takeda K (2005)	16096059	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250369	2539659	2543233	276214	279661	SPBC146.13c	SPAC630.03	myo1	arp3	-	act2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sirotkin V (2005)	16087707	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250372	2540498	2542418	277026	278881	SPBC27.02c	SPAC1805.07c	ask1	dad2	mug181	hos2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250373	2540498	3361558	277026	280634	SPBC27.02c	SPAC14C4.16	ask1	dad3	mug181	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250374	2540498	2542311	277026	278777	SPBC27.02c	SPAC16A10.05c	ask1	dad1	mug181	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250375	2542311	2540498	278777	277026	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC27.02c	dad1	ask1	-	mug181	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250376	2540498	2540249	277026	276781	SPBC27.02c	SPBC32F12.08c	ask1	duo1	mug181	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250377	2540498	2542102	277026	278578	SPBC27.02c	SPAC8C9.17c	ask1	spc34	mug181	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250378	2540498	2542489	277026	278948	SPBC27.02c	SPAC589.08c	ask1	dam1	mug181	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250379	2542489	2540498	278948	277026	SPAC589.08c	SPBC27.02c	dam1	ask1	-	mug181	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250380	2540498	2539507	277026	276070	SPBC27.02c	SPCC417.02	ask1	dad5	mug181	hos3|hsk3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250381	2542311	2542102	278777	278578	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC8C9.17c	dad1	spc34	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250382	2542311	2542489	278777	278948	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC589.08c	dad1	dam1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250383	2542489	2542311	278948	278777	SPAC589.08c	SPAC16A10.05c	dam1	dad1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250384	2542311	2540249	278777	276781	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC32F12.08c	dad1	duo1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250385	2542311	2542418	278777	278881	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC1805.07c	dad1	dad2	-	hos2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250386	2542311	3361558	278777	280634	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC14C4.16	dad1	dad3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250387	2542489	2542418	278948	278881	SPAC589.08c	SPAC1805.07c	dam1	dad2	-	hos2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250388	2542489	3361558	278948	280634	SPAC589.08c	SPAC14C4.16	dam1	dad3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250389	2542489	2540249	278948	276781	SPAC589.08c	SPBC32F12.08c	dam1	duo1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250390	2542489	2542102	278948	278578	SPAC589.08c	SPAC8C9.17c	dam1	spc34	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250391	2540804	2542304	277323	278771	SPBC18E5.03c	SPAC1687.20c	sim4	mis6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250392	2540804	2542737	277323	279187	SPBC18E5.03c	SPAC25B8.14	sim4	mal2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250393	2542737	2540804	279187	277323	SPAC25B8.14	SPBC18E5.03c	mal2	sim4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250394	2540804	2538719	277323	275303	SPBC18E5.03c	SPCC1393.04	sim4	fta4	-	sma4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250395	2540804	2541854	277323	278345	SPBC18E5.03c	SPAC1F8.06	sim4	fta5	-	sma5|pfl8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250396	2540804	2541342	277323	277853	SPBC18E5.03c	SPBP8B7.12c	sim4	fta3	-	sma3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250397	2540804	2542367	277323	278831	SPBC18E5.03c	SPAC1783.03	sim4	fta2	-	sma2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250398	2540804	2543650	277323	280064	SPBC18E5.03c	SPAC4F10.12	sim4	fta1	-	sma1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250399	2540804	2541321	277323	277833	SPBC18E5.03c	SPBP22H7.09c	sim4	mis15	-	pi022|SPACTOKYO_453.12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250400	2540804	3361327	277323	280403	SPBC18E5.03c	SPBC21.01	sim4	mis17	-	SPBC776.19	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250401	2540804	2542646	277323	279100	SPBC18E5.03c	SPAC11H11.05c	sim4	fta6	-	sma6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250402	2540804	2539115	277323	275687	SPBC18E5.03c	SPCC1235.07	sim4	fta7	-	cnl3|sma7	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250403	2540804	2542311	277323	278777	SPBC18E5.03c	SPAC16A10.05c	sim4	dad1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250404	2542311	2540804	278777	277323	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC18E5.03c	dad1	sim4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250405	2542737	2542304	279187	278771	SPAC25B8.14	SPAC1687.20c	mal2	mis6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250406	2542737	2543650	279187	280064	SPAC25B8.14	SPAC4F10.12	mal2	fta1	-	sma1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250407	2542737	2538719	279187	275303	SPAC25B8.14	SPCC1393.04	mal2	fta4	-	sma4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250408	2542737	2541854	279187	278345	SPAC25B8.14	SPAC1F8.06	mal2	fta5	-	sma5|pfl8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250409	2542737	2541342	279187	277853	SPAC25B8.14	SPBP8B7.12c	mal2	fta3	-	sma3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250410	2542737	2542367	279187	278831	SPAC25B8.14	SPAC1783.03	mal2	fta2	-	sma2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250411	2542737	3361327	279187	280403	SPAC25B8.14	SPBC21.01	mal2	mis17	-	SPBC776.19	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250412	2542737	2542311	279187	278777	SPAC25B8.14	SPAC16A10.05c	mal2	dad1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250413	2542311	2542737	278777	279187	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC25B8.14	dad1	mal2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250414	2542311	2538719	278777	275303	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC1393.04	dad1	fta4	-	sma4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250415	2542311	2541854	278777	278345	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC1F8.06	dad1	fta5	-	sma5|pfl8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250416	2542311	2542304	278777	278771	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC1687.20c	dad1	mis6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250417	2542311	2543650	278777	280064	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC4F10.12	dad1	fta1	-	sma1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250418	2542311	2541342	278777	277853	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBP8B7.12c	dad1	fta3	-	sma3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250419	2542311	2541321	278777	277833	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBP22H7.09c	dad1	mis15	-	pi022|SPACTOKYO_453.12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250420	2542004	2540238	278487	276770	SPAC27F1.04c	SPBC336.08	nuf2	spc24	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250421	2542004	2541047	278487	277562	SPAC27F1.04c	SPBC409.09c	nuf2	mis13	-	cnl1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250422	2542004	2539155	278487	275727	SPAC27F1.04c	SPCC1020.02	nuf2	spc7	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250423	2539155	2542004	275727	278487	SPCC1020.02	SPAC27F1.04c	spc7	nuf2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250424	2542004	2541667	278487	278163	SPAC27F1.04c	SPAC29E6.04	nuf2	nnf1	-	SPAC30.08	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250425	2542004	2543482	278487	279902	SPAC27F1.04c	SPAC688.02c	nuf2	mis14	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250426	2542004	2540494	278487	277022	SPAC27F1.04c	SPBC409.04c	nuf2	mis12	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250427	2540494	2542004	277022	278487	SPBC409.04c	SPAC27F1.04c	mis12	nuf2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250428	2542004	2539200	278487	275771	SPAC27F1.04c	SPCC188.04c	nuf2	spc25	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250429	2542004	2540097	278487	276635	SPAC27F1.04c	SPBC11C11.03	nuf2	ndc80	-	ndc10|tid3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250430	2540494	2540238	277022	276770	SPBC409.04c	SPBC336.08	mis12	spc24	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250431	2540494	2541047	277022	277562	SPBC409.04c	SPBC409.09c	mis12	mis13	-	cnl1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250432	2540494	2539155	277022	275727	SPBC409.04c	SPCC1020.02	mis12	spc7	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250433	2539155	2540494	275727	277022	SPCC1020.02	SPBC409.04c	spc7	mis12	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250434	2540494	2541667	277022	278163	SPBC409.04c	SPAC29E6.04	mis12	nnf1	-	SPAC30.08	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250435	2540494	2543482	277022	279902	SPBC409.04c	SPAC688.02c	mis12	mis14	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250436	2540494	2539200	277022	275771	SPBC409.04c	SPCC188.04c	mis12	spc25	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250437	2540494	2540097	277022	276635	SPBC409.04c	SPBC11C11.03	mis12	ndc80	-	ndc10|tid3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250438	2539155	2540238	275727	276770	SPCC1020.02	SPBC336.08	spc7	spc24	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250439	2539155	2541047	275727	277562	SPCC1020.02	SPBC409.09c	spc7	mis13	-	cnl1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250440	2539155	2541667	275727	278163	SPCC1020.02	SPAC29E6.04	spc7	nnf1	-	SPAC30.08	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250441	2539155	2543482	275727	279902	SPCC1020.02	SPAC688.02c	spc7	mis14	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250442	2539155	2539200	275727	275771	SPCC1020.02	SPCC188.04c	spc7	spc25	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250443	2539155	2540097	275727	276635	SPCC1020.02	SPBC11C11.03	spc7	ndc80	-	ndc10|tid3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu X (2005)	16079914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250444	2541276	2541908	277790	278398	SPBC947.11c	SPAC23D3.02	elg1	rfc2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kim J (2005)	16040599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250445	2541276	2541493	277790	277995	SPBC947.11c	SPAC27E2.10c	elg1	rfc3	-	SPAPJ698.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kim J (2005)	16040599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250446	2541276	2542790	277790	279239	SPBC947.11c	SPAC1687.03c	elg1	rfc4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kim J (2005)	16040599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250447	2541276	2540215	277790	276748	SPBC947.11c	SPBC83.14c	elg1	rfc5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kim J (2005)	16040599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250448	2541418	2543657	277924	280071	SPAC22A12.07c	SPAPB1E7.09	ogm1	ogm2	oma1	oma2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Willer T (2005)	15948957	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250449	2539050	2543116	275623	279548	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC3A11.08	rik1	pcu4	-	Cul-4|cul4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Horn PJ (2005)	16024659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250450	2539050	2538848	275623	275429	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC613.12c	rik1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Horn PJ (2005)	16024659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250451	2539050	2539420	275623	275985	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC970.07c	rik1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Horn PJ (2005)	16024659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250452	2539050	2541897	275623	278387	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC23H4.18c	rik1	rbx1	-	pip1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Horn PJ (2005)	16024659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250453	2539050	2540825	275623	277343	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC428.08c	rik1	clr4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Horn PJ (2005)	16024659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250454	2539050	2539523	275623	276085	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC622.09	rik1	htb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Horn PJ (2005)	16024659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250455	2543058	2540565	279492	277092	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC1D7.04	rpn15	mlo3	dss1|sem1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Thakurta AG (2005)	15990877	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250456	2543058	2539741	279492	276293	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC16A3.05c	rpn15	rae1	dss1|sem1	cut21	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Thakurta AG (2005)	15990877	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250457	2542433	2540565	278895	277092	SPAC17G6.14c	SPBC1D7.04	uap56	mlo3	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Thakurta AG (2005)	15990877	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250458	2540565	2539741	277092	276293	SPBC1D7.04	SPBC16A3.05c	mlo3	rae1	-	cut21	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Thakurta AG (2005)	15990877	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250459	2542433	2539741	278895	276293	SPAC17G6.14c	SPBC16A3.05c	uap56	rae1	-	cut21	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Thakurta AG (2005)	15990877	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250460	2543058	2542433	279492	278895	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC17G6.14c	rpn15	uap56	dss1|sem1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Thakurta AG (2005)	15990877	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250461	2540727	2540565	277250	277092	SPBC1921.03c	SPBC1D7.04	mex67	mlo3	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Thakurta AG (2005)	15990877	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250462	2543058	2542433	279492	278895	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC17G6.14c	rpn15	uap56	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Thakurta AG (2005)	15990877	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250463	2543058	2539741	279492	276293	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC16A3.05c	rpn15	rae1	dss1|sem1	cut21	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Thakurta AG (2005)	15990877	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250464	2541633	2542239	278129	278711	SPAC664.01c	SPAC18G6.02c	swi6	chp1	SPAC824.10c	-	Co-localization	physical	Cam HP (2005)	15976807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250465	2541633	2538930	278129	275506	SPAC664.01c	SPCC188.13c	swi6	dcr1	SPAC824.10c	SPCC584.10c	Co-localization	physical	Cam HP (2005)	15976807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250466	2541633	2540825	278129	277343	SPAC664.01c	SPBC428.08c	swi6	clr4	SPAC824.10c	-	Co-localization	physical	Cam HP (2005)	15976807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250467	2542467	2542239	278928	278711	SPAC1834.04	SPAC18G6.02c	hht1	chp1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Cam HP (2005)	15976807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250468	2542467	2538930	278928	275506	SPAC1834.04	SPCC188.13c	hht1	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Co-localization	physical	Cam HP (2005)	15976807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250469	2542467	2540825	278928	277343	SPAC1834.04	SPBC428.08c	hht1	clr4	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Cam HP (2005)	15976807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250470	2541220	2542239	277734	278711	SPBC8D2.04	SPAC18G6.02c	hht2	chp1	h3.2	-	Co-localization	physical	Cam HP (2005)	15976807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250471	2541220	2538930	277734	275506	SPBC8D2.04	SPCC188.13c	hht2	dcr1	h3.2	SPCC584.10c	Co-localization	physical	Cam HP (2005)	15976807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250472	2541220	2540825	277734	277343	SPBC8D2.04	SPBC428.08c	hht2	clr4	h3.2	-	Co-localization	physical	Cam HP (2005)	15976807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250473	2543336	2539537	279759	276099	SPAC688.11	SPCP1E11.04c	end4	pal1	sla2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ge W (2005)	15975911	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250474	2539537	2543336	276099	279759	SPCP1E11.04c	SPAC688.11	pal1	end4	-	sla2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ge W (2005)	15975911	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250475	2539537	2543336	276099	279759	SPCP1E11.04c	SPAC688.11	pal1	end4	-	sla2	Co-localization	physical	Ge W (2005)	15975911	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250476	2542140	2539928	278616	276472	SPAC1783.07c	SPBC1604.08c	pap1	imp1	caf3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Umeda M (2005)	15937127	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250477	2542140	2539426	278616	275991	SPAC1783.07c	SPCC962.03c	pap1	cut15	caf3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Umeda M (2005)	15937127	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250478	2542988	2539642	279426	276197	SPAC1006.09	SPBC1706.01	win1	tea4	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	wsh3	Two-hybrid	physical	Tatebe H (2005)	15936270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250479	2539642	2539047	276197	275620	SPBC1706.01	SPCC1223.06	tea4	tea1	wsh3	alp8	Co-localization	physical	Tatebe H (2005)	15936270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250480	2539047	2539642	275620	276197	SPCC1223.06	SPBC1706.01	tea1	tea4	alp8	wsh3	Co-localization	physical	Tatebe H (2005)	15936270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250481	2541975	2543001	278460	279439	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC1006.08	cdc15	etd1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Daga RR (2005)	15933715	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250482	2543001	2540660	279439	277185	SPAC1006.08	SPBC21.06c	etd1	cdc7	-	its10|pld1	Co-localization	physical	Daga RR (2005)	15933715	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250483	2543001	2541599	279439	278096	SPAC1006.08	SPAC24B11.11c	etd1	sid2	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Daga RR (2005)	15933715	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250484	2540589	2542304	277115	278771	SPBC20F10.06	SPAC1687.20c	mad2	mis6	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Saitoh S (2005)	15930132	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250485	2540589	2542304	277115	278771	SPBC20F10.06	SPAC1687.20c	mad2	mis6	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Saitoh S (2005)	15930132	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250486	2540589	2540804	277115	277323	SPBC20F10.06	SPBC18E5.03c	mad2	sim4	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Saitoh S (2005)	15930132	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250487	2540589	2542004	277115	278487	SPBC20F10.06	SPAC27F1.04c	mad2	nuf2	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Saitoh S (2005)	15930132	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250488	2540804	2542004	277323	278487	SPBC18E5.03c	SPAC27F1.04c	sim4	nuf2	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Saitoh S (2005)	15930132	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250489	2540810	2541720	277329	278214	SPBC19C7.03	SPAC23H3.13c	cyr1	gpa2	git2	git8	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ogihara H (2005)	15925945	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250491	2540737	2542231	277260	278704	SPBC19G7.05c	SPAC19G12.14	bgs1	its3	cps1|drc1	-	Co-localization	physical	Deng L (2005)	15923187	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250492	2539580	2542231	276139	278704	SPCC645.07	SPAC19G12.14	rgf1	its3	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Deng L (2005)	15923187	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250493	2542347	2539938	278812	276482	SPAC1751.03	SPBC17D11.05	SPAC1751.03	tif32	csn7|csn72|csn7b|SPAC31A2.01	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou C (2005)	15904532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250494	2542347	2542090	278812	278567	SPAC1751.03	SPAC25G10.08	SPAC1751.03	SPAC25G10.08	csn7|csn72|csn7b|SPAC31A2.01	p116	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou C (2005)	15904532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250495	2542347	2543621	278812	280035	SPAC1751.03	SPAC4A8.16c	SPAC1751.03	tif33	csn7|csn72|csn7b|SPAC31A2.01	SPAC823.01c|SPAC1E11.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou C (2005)	15904532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250496	2542347	2543153	278812	279585	SPAC1751.03	SPAC821.05	SPAC1751.03	SPAC821.05	csn7|csn72|csn7b|SPAC31A2.01	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou C (2005)	15904532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250497	2542347	2543537	278812	279954	SPAC1751.03	SPAC4D7.05	SPAC1751.03	sum1	csn7|csn72|csn7b|SPAC31A2.01	tif34	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou C (2005)	15904532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250498	2542347	2540868	278812	277385	SPAC1751.03	SPBC4C3.07	SPAC1751.03	SPBC4C3.07	csn7|csn72|csn7b|SPAC31A2.01	csn6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou C (2005)	15904532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250499	2541089	2539938	277604	276482	SPBC646.09c	SPBC17D11.05	int6	tif32	yin6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou C (2005)	15904532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250500	2541089	2542090	277604	278567	SPBC646.09c	SPAC25G10.08	int6	SPAC25G10.08	yin6	p116	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou C (2005)	15904532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250501	2541089	2543621	277604	280035	SPBC646.09c	SPAC4A8.16c	int6	tif33	yin6	SPAC823.01c|SPAC1E11.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou C (2005)	15904532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250502	2541089	2543412	277604	279834	SPBC646.09c	SPAC637.07	int6	moe1	yin6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou C (2005)	15904532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250503	2541089	2540868	277604	277385	SPBC646.09c	SPBC4C3.07	int6	SPBC4C3.07	yin6	csn6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou C (2005)	15904532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250504	2541089	2540819	277604	277337	SPBC646.09c	SPBC18H10.03	int6	tif35	yin6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou C (2005)	15904532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250505	2541089	2543537	277604	279954	SPBC646.09c	SPAC4D7.05	int6	sum1	yin6	tif34	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou C (2005)	15904532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250506	2541089	2543412	277604	279834	SPBC646.09c	SPAC637.07	int6	moe1	yin6	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhou C (2005)	15904532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250507	2543412	2541089	279834	277604	SPAC637.07	SPBC646.09c	moe1	int6	-	yin6	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhou C (2005)	15904532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250508	2541089	2541089	277604	277604	SPBC646.09c	SPBC646.09c	int6	int6	yin6	yin6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou C (2005)	15904532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250509	2541089	2543153	277604	279585	SPBC646.09c	SPAC821.05	int6	SPAC821.05	yin6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou C (2005)	15904532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250510	2541089	2542347	277604	278812	SPBC646.09c	SPAC1751.03	int6	SPAC1751.03	yin6	csn7|csn72|csn7b|SPAC31A2.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou C (2005)	15904532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250511	2543580	2543580	279995	279995	SPAC644.14c	SPAC644.14c	rad51	rad51	rhp51	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Sauvageau S (2005)	15899844	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250512	2542106	2542106	278582	278582	SPAC8E11.03c	SPAC8E11.03c	dmc1	dmc1	dmp1	dmp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Sauvageau S (2005)	15899844	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250519	2539495	2541652	276058	278148	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC24B11.06c	ptc1	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Nguyen AN (1999)	10398679	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Dephosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250520	2540019	2539920	276563	276464	SPBC1685.01	SPBC119.08	pmp1	pmk1	dsp1	spm1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Sugiura R (1998)	9427748	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Dephosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250521	2540019	2539920	276563	276464	SPBC1685.01	SPBC119.08	pmp1	pmk1	dsp1	spm1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sugiura R (1998)	9427748	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250522	2542200	2541652	278675	278148	SPAC19D5.01	SPAC24B11.06c	pyp2	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Millar JB (1995)	7657164	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Dephosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250523	2542677	2539123	279130	275695	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC18B5.03	pyp1	wee1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Hannig G (1993)	8256510	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Dephosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250524	2542200	2539123	278675	275695	SPAC19D5.01	SPCC18B5.03	pyp2	wee1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Hannig G (1993)	8256510	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Dephosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250525	2541443	2539869	277948	276415	SPAC11E3.09	SPBC11B10.09	pyp3	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Millar JB (1992)	1464318	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Dephosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250526	2538762	2539804	275345	276354	SPCC306.04c	SPBC1105.11c	set1	hht3	kmt2	h3.3	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kanoh J (2003)	12589755	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Methylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250528	2539545	2542463	276106	278924	SPCC4B3.12	SPAC1834.03c	set9	hhf1	-	h4.1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Sanders SL (2004)	15550243	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Methylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250529	2539545	2541200	276106	277714	SPCC4B3.12	SPBC8D2.03c	set9	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Sanders SL (2004)	15550243	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Methylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250530	2539545	2539991	276106	276535	SPCC4B3.12	SPBC1105.12	set9	hhf3	-	h4.3	Biochemical Activity	physical	Sanders SL (2004)	15550243	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Methylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250531	2540129	2542637	276666	279091	SPBC12D12.08c	SPAC24H6.03	ned8	cul3	SPBC24C6.01c|nedd8|ubl1	pcu3	Biochemical Activity	physical	Zhou C (2001)	11504566	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Nedd(Rub1)ylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250532	2540352	2542637	276881	279091	SPBC215.03c	SPAC24H6.03	csn1	cul3	-	pcu3	Biochemical Activity	physical	Zhou C (2001)	11504566	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Nedd(Rub1)ylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250533	2541517	2542637	278018	279091	SPAC22A12.03c	SPAC24H6.03	csn4	cul3	-	pcu3	Biochemical Activity	physical	Zhou C (2001)	11504566	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Nedd(Rub1)ylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250534	2541529	2542637	278029	279091	SPAC1687.13c	SPAC24H6.03	csn5	cul3	-	pcu3	Biochemical Activity	physical	Zhou C (2001)	11504566	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Nedd(Rub1)ylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250535	2540719	2539087	277242	275659	SPBC216.05	SPCC1259.13	rad3	chk1	-	rad27	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lopez-Girona A (2001)	11553781	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250536	2540013	2540013	276557	276557	SPBC14C8.07c	SPBC14C8.07c	cdc18	cdc18	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Grabowski B (2001)	11514535	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250537	2543441	2543441	279861	279861	SPAC821.12	SPAC821.12	orb6	orb6	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Wiley DJ (2003)	12646585	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250538	2539869	2538736	276415	275320	SPBC11B10.09	SPCC1322.12c	cdc2	bub1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Yamaguchi S (2003)	12606573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250539	2541165	2540620	277680	277146	SPBC776.12c	SPBC4.04c	hsk1	mcm2	cdc7	cdc19|nda1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lee JK (2003)	12604790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250540	2541165	2541165	277680	277680	SPBC776.12c	SPBC776.12c	hsk1	hsk1	cdc7	cdc7	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lee JK (2003)	12604790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250542	2539997	2541726	276541	278220	SPBC1604.14c	SPAC22H10.07	shk1	scd2	orb2|pak1	ral3	Biochemical Activity	physical	Chang E (1999)	10567532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250543	2538959	2542632	275533	279086	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC24H6.05	cds1	cdc25	-	sal2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Furnari B (1999)	10198041	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250544	2539087	2542632	275659	279086	SPCC1259.13	SPAC24H6.05	chk1	cdc25	rad27	sal2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Furnari B (1999)	10198041	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250545	2541165	2540620	277680	277146	SPBC776.12c	SPBC4.04c	hsk1	mcm2	cdc7	cdc19|nda1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Brown GW (1998)	9705352	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250546	2542988	2541055	279426	277570	SPAC1006.09	SPBC409.07c	win1	wis1	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	smf2|spc2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Samejima I (1998)	9693384	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250547	2543327	2540471	279750	276999	SPAC1D4.06c	SPBC19F8.07	csk1	mcs6	-	cdk7|crk1|mop1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Hermand D (1998)	9857180	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250548	2539517	2539206	276079	275776	SPCC576.15c	SPCC24B10.07	ksg1	gad8	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Matsuo T (2003)	12805221	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250549	2539997	2539047	276541	275620	SPBC1604.14c	SPCC1223.06	shk1	tea1	orb2|pak1	alp8	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kim H (2003)	12764130	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250550	2540580	2540258	277106	276789	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC32C12.02	ran1	ste11	pat1	aff1|stex	Biochemical Activity	physical	Li P (1996)	8945514	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250551	2542873	2541055	279318	277570	SPAC9G1.02	SPBC409.07c	wis4	wis1	wak1|wik1	smf2|spc2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Shieh JC (1998)	9718372	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250552	2541055	2541055	277570	277570	SPBC409.07c	SPBC409.07c	wis1	wis1	smf2|spc2	smf2|spc2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Shieh JC (1998)	9718372	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250553	2541055	2541652	277570	278148	SPBC409.07c	SPAC24B11.06c	wis1	sty1	smf2|spc2	phh1|spc1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Shieh JC (1998)	9718372	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250554	2539869	2539817	276415	276367	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC146.03c	cdc2	cut3	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	smc4	Biochemical Activity	physical	Sutani T (1999)	10485849	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250555	2541165	2540620	277680	277146	SPBC776.12c	SPBC4.04c	hsk1	mcm2	cdc7	cdc19|nda1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Snaith HA (2003)	14508607	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250556	2539997	2542617	276541	279071	SPBC1604.14c	SPAC13A11.01c	shk1	rga8	orb2|pak1	SPAC2F7.18c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Yang P (2003)	14506270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	No Modification	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250557	2539920	2539434	276464	275997	SPBC119.08	SPCC757.09c	pmk1	rnc1	spm1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Sugiura R (2003)	12931193	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250558	2540239	2541916	276771	278406	SPBC32H8.10	SPAC23C4.19	cdk9	spt5	SPACTOKYO_453.22	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Pei Y (2003)	12904290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250559	2540239	2540239	276771	276771	SPBC32H8.10	SPBC32H8.10	cdk9	cdk9	SPACTOKYO_453.22	SPACTOKYO_453.22	Biochemical Activity	physical	Pei Y (2003)	12904290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250560	2541652	2541982	278148	278467	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC23A1.06c	sty1	cmk2	phh1|spc1	mkp2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Sanchez-Piris M (2002)	11886858	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250561	2540580	2542080	277106	278557	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC27D7.03c	ran1	mei2	pat1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Watanabe Y (1997)	9062192	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250562	2539087	2539123	275659	275695	SPCC1259.13	SPCC18B5.03	chk1	wee1	rad27	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	O'Connell MJ (1997)	9034337	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250563	2539312	2541185	275879	277699	SPCC777.14	SPBC6B1.07	prp4	prp1	-	zer1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Schwelnus W (2001)	11252721	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250564	2539123	2539869	275695	276415	SPCC18B5.03	SPBC11B10.09	wee1	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Parker LL (1991)	1850698	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250565	2539123	2539869	275695	276415	SPCC18B5.03	SPBC11B10.09	wee1	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Parker LL (1992)	1372994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250566	2539997	2539997	276541	276541	SPBC1604.14c	SPBC1604.14c	shk1	shk1	orb2|pak1	orb2|pak1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kim HW (2001)	11389855	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250567	2541165	2541633	277680	278129	SPBC776.12c	SPAC664.01c	hsk1	swi6	cdc7	SPAC824.10c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Bailis JM (2003)	14625560	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250568	2540027	2540705	276571	277228	SPBC1734.14c	SPBC20F10.01	suc1	gar1	p13	SPBC25H2.01c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Gulli MP (1997)	9211981	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250569	2539869	2540013	276415	276557	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC14C8.07c	cdc2	cdc18	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Brown GW (1997)	9177184	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250570	2541728	2543455	278222	279875	SPAC20G4.03c	SPAC3G9.09c	hri1	tif211	-	eIF2alpha	Biochemical Activity	physical	Zhan K (2002)	12242291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250571	2541943	2543455	278430	279875	SPAC222.07c	SPAC3G9.09c	hri2	tif211	-	eIF2alpha	Biochemical Activity	physical	Zhan K (2002)	12242291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250572	2541055	2541652	277570	278148	SPBC409.07c	SPAC24B11.06c	wis1	sty1	smf2|spc2	phh1|spc1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Nguyen AN (1999)	10398679	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250573	2539869	2541159	276415	277674	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC685.09	cdc2	orc2	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	orp2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Vas A (2001)	11486016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250574	2539869	2539640	276415	276195	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC32F12.09	cdc2	rum1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Martin-Castellanos C (2000)	10679013	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250575	2539123	2539869	275695	276415	SPCC18B5.03	SPBC11B10.09	wee1	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lee MS (1994)	7982971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250576	2539847	2539645	276395	276200	SPBC530.14c	SPBC146.07	dsk1	prp2	-	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Tang Z (2000)	10629038	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250577	2539847	2539645	276395	276200	SPBC530.14c	SPBC146.07	dsk1	prp2	-	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Tang Z (1998)	9488736	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250578	2538959	2542632	275533	279086	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC24H6.05	cds1	cdc25	-	sal2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Zeng Y (1998)	9774107	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250579	2538959	2542632	275533	279086	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC24H6.05	cds1	cdc25	-	sal2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Zeng Y (1999)	10523629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250580	2539087	2542632	275659	279086	SPCC1259.13	SPAC24H6.05	chk1	cdc25	rad27	sal2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Zeng Y (1998)	9774107	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250581	2540329	2541652	276859	278148	SPBC29B5.01	SPAC24B11.06c	atf1	sty1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	phh1|spc1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Soto T (2002)	12383265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250582	2539123	2538959	275695	275533	SPCC18B5.03	SPCC18B5.11c	wee1	cds1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Liang DT (2001)	11606526	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250583	2543666	2539123	280080	275695	SPAC644.06c	SPCC18B5.03	cdr1	wee1	nim1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Wu L (1993)	8515818	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250584	2543666	2539123	280080	275695	SPAC644.06c	SPCC18B5.03	cdr1	wee1	nim1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Parker LL (1993)	8515817	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250585	2539869	2540992	276415	277508	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC342.05	cdc2	crb2	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	rhp9	Biochemical Activity	physical	Esashi F (1999)	10488332	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250586	2543240	2540719	279668	277242	SPAC694.06c	SPBC216.05	mrc1	rad3	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Zhao H (2003)	14585996	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250587	2543240	2539209	279668	275779	SPAC694.06c	SPCC23B6.03c	mrc1	tel1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Zhao H (2003)	14585996	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250589	2541652	2539027	278148	275600	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC1322.08	sty1	srk1	phh1|spc1	mkp1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Smith DA (2002)	12080074	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250590	2541590	2539123	278087	275695	SPAC57A10.02	SPCC18B5.03	cdr2	wee1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kanoh J (1998)	9843572	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250591	2539869	2540013	276415	276557	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC14C8.07c	cdc2	cdc18	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lopez-Girona A (1998)	9436991	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250592	2539869	2539640	276415	276195	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC32F12.09	cdc2	rum1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Seibert V (2002)	12167173	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250593	2543666	2543666	280080	280080	SPAC644.06c	SPAC644.06c	cdr1	cdr1	nim1	nim1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Coleman TR (1993)	7681363	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250594	2542873	2541055	279318	277570	SPAC9G1.02	SPBC409.07c	wis4	wis1	wak1|wik1	smf2|spc2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Samejima I (1997)	9321395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250595	2539869	2539640	276415	276195	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC32F12.09	cdc2	rum1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Correa-Bordes J (1997)	9303310	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250596	2541652	2540329	278148	276859	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC29B5.01	sty1	atf1	phh1|spc1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Biochemical Activity	physical	Wilkinson MG (1996)	8824588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250597	2539545	2540992	276106	277508	SPCC4B3.12	SPBC342.05	set9	crb2	-	rhp9	Biochemical Activity	physical	Sanders SL (2004)	15550243	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250598	2542474	2540258	278934	276789	SPAC31G5.09c	SPBC32C12.02	spk1	ste11	-	aff1|stex	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kjaerulff S (2005)	15713656	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250599	2542632	2539027	279086	275600	SPAC24H6.05	SPCC1322.08	cdc25	srk1	sal2	mkp1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lopez-Aviles S (2005)	15629716	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250600	2539020	2542312	275593	278778	SPCC5E4.06	SPAC16A10.06c	smc6	nse2	rad18	pli2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Andrews EA (2005)	15601841	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Sumoylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250601	2539436	2542312	275999	278778	SPCC645.04	SPAC16A10.06c	nse3	nse2	-	pli2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Andrews EA (2005)	15601841	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Sumoylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250602	2539050	2539523	275623	276085	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC622.09	rik1	htb1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Horn PJ (2005)	16024659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250603	2540825	2539523	277343	276085	SPBC428.08c	SPCC622.09	clr4	htb1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Horn PJ (2005)	16024659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250604	2539420	2539523	275985	276085	SPCC970.07c	SPCC622.09	raf2	htb1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Horn PJ (2005)	16024659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250605	2543583	3361260	279998	280336	SPAC644.12	SPBP22H7.07	cdc5	prp5	-	cwf1|pi024|SPACTOKYO_453.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald WH (1999)	10409726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250606	2543583	2542531	279998	278989	SPAC644.12	SPAC3A12.11c	cdc5	cwf2	-	prp3|cwc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald WH (1999)	10409726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250607	2543583	2540753	279998	277274	SPAC644.12	SPBC211.02c	cdc5	cwf3	-	syf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald WH (1999)	10409726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250608	2543583	2540328	279998	276858	SPAC644.12	SPBC31F10.11c	cdc5	cwf4	-	syf3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald WH (1999)	10409726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250609	2543583	2538974	279998	275548	SPAC644.12	SPCC550.02c	cdc5	cwf5	-	ecm2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald WH (1999)	10409726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250610	2543583	2543413	279998	279835	SPAC644.12	SPAC4F8.12c	cdc5	spp42	-	cwf6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald WH (1999)	10409726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250611	2543583	2540585	279998	277111	SPAC644.12	SPBC28F2.04c	cdc5	cwf7	-	spf27	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald WH (1999)	10409726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250612	2543583	2542256	279998	278726	SPAC644.12	SPAC29A4.08c	cdc5	prp19	-	cwf8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald WH (1999)	10409726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250613	2543583	2542480	279998	278940	SPAC644.12	SPAC2C4.03c	cdc5	smd2	-	cwf9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald WH (1999)	10409726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250614	2543583	2540711	279998	277234	SPAC644.12	SPBC215.12	cdc5	cwf10	-	snu114|spef2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald WH (1999)	10409726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250615	2542615	2540655	279069	277180	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBC83.04	cut20	apc15	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2006)	16950791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250616	2542615	2542211	279069	278685	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC27D7.05c	cut20	apc14	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	omt1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2006)	16950791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250617	2542615	2540285	279069	276816	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBC28E12.01c	cut20	apc13	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	SPBC9B6.12c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2006)	16950791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250618	2542615	2542045	279069	278526	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC23C11.12	cut20	hcn1	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2006)	16950791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250619	2542615	2543187	279069	279616	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC343.03	cut20	apc11	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2006)	16950791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250620	2542615	2540307	279069	276837	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBC1A4.01	cut20	apc10	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	SPBC1E8.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2006)	16950791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250621	2542615	2542880	279069	279325	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC6F12.14	cut20	cut23	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	apc8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2006)	16950791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250622	2542615	2541592	279069	278089	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC6F12.15c	cut20	cut9	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	dre1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2006)	16950791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250623	2542615	2543355	279069	279777	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC959.09c	cut20	apc5	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	SPAP32A8.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2006)	16950791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250624	2542615	2542615	279069	279069	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC19G12.01c	cut20	cut20	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2006)	16950791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250625	2542615	2542438	279069	278900	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC17C9.01c	cut20	nuc2	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	SPAC1851.01|apc3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2006)	16950791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250626	2542615	3361204	279069	280280	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBP23A10.04	cut20	apc2	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2006)	16950791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250627	2542615	2539639	279069	276194	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBC106.09	cut20	cut4	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	apc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yoon HJ (2006)	16950791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250628	2539420	2541897	275985	278387	SPCC970.07c	SPAC23H4.18c	raf2	rbx1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	pip1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hong EJ (2006)	17114925	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250629	2539420	2543116	275985	279548	SPCC970.07c	SPAC3A11.08	raf2	pcu4	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Cul-4|cul4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hong EJ (2006)	17114925	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250630	2539420	2542029	275985	278511	SPCC970.07c	SPAC8E11.02c	raf2	rad24	clr7|cmc2|dos2	anr5|sam4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hong EJ (2006)	17114925	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250631	2539420	2540129	275985	276666	SPCC970.07c	SPBC12D12.08c	raf2	ned8	clr7|cmc2|dos2	SPBC24C6.01c|nedd8|ubl1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hong EJ (2006)	17114925	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250632	2539420	2539050	275985	275623	SPCC970.07c	SPCC11E10.08	raf2	rik1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hong EJ (2006)	17114925	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250633	2539420	2538848	275985	275429	SPCC970.07c	SPCC613.12c	raf2	raf1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hong EJ (2006)	17114925	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250634	2539050	2538848	275623	275429	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC613.12c	rik1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hong EJ (2006)	17114925	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250635	2539050	2539420	275623	275985	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC970.07c	rik1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hong EJ (2006)	17114925	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250636	2539050	2543116	275623	279548	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC3A11.08	rik1	pcu4	-	Cul-4|cul4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hong EJ (2006)	17114925	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250637	2539050	2539523	275623	276085	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC622.09	rik1	htb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hong EJ (2006)	17114925	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250638	2539050	2542463	275623	278924	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC1834.03c	rik1	hhf1	-	h4.1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hong EJ (2006)	17114925	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250639	2539050	2542029	275623	278511	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC8E11.02c	rik1	rad24	-	anr5|sam4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hong EJ (2006)	17114925	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250640	2539050	2540825	275623	277343	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC428.08c	rik1	clr4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hong EJ (2006)	17114925	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250641	2539050	2540129	275623	276666	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC12D12.08c	rik1	ned8	-	SPBC24C6.01c|nedd8|ubl1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hong EJ (2006)	17114925	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250642	2541110	2542815	277625	279262	SPBC646.05c	SPAC13D6.01	erg9	pof14	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tafforeau L (2006)	17016471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250643	2542815	2542393	279262	278857	SPAC13D6.01	SPAC17G6.12	pof14	cul1	-	pcu1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tafforeau L (2006)	17016471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250644	2542815	2540917	279262	277433	SPAC13D6.01	SPBC409.05	pof14	skp1	-	psh1|sph1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tafforeau L (2006)	17016471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250645	2541592	2542045	278089	278526	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC23C11.12	cut9	hcn1	dre1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yoon HJ (2006)	16950791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250646	2542045	2541592	278526	278089	SPAC23C11.12	SPAC6F12.15c	hcn1	cut9	-	dre1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yoon HJ (2006)	16950791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250647	2541871	2539737	278361	276289	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC16A3.07c	res2	nrm1	mcs1|pct1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	de Bruin RA (2006)	16916637	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250648	2539737	2541871	276289	278361	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC22F3.09c	nrm1	res2	-	mcs1|pct1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	de Bruin RA (2006)	16916637	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250649	2540667	2543117	277192	279549	SPBC211.06	SPAC806.08c	gfh1	mod21	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Anders A (2006)	17021256	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250650	2540392	2539309	276920	275876	SPBC365.15	SPCC4G3.19	alp4	alp16	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Anders A (2006)	17021256	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250651	2540690	2543117	277215	279549	SPBC428.20c	SPAC806.08c	alp6	mod21	SPBC902.01c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Anders A (2006)	17021256	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250652	2540690	2540667	277215	277192	SPBC428.20c	SPBC211.06	alp6	gfh1	SPBC902.01c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Anders A (2006)	17021256	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250653	2540392	2540667	276920	277192	SPBC365.15	SPBC211.06	alp4	gfh1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Anders A (2006)	17021256	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250654	2540392	2543117	276920	279549	SPBC365.15	SPAC806.08c	alp4	mod21	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Anders A (2006)	17021256	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250655	2542252	2539403	278722	275968	SPAC17A2.13c	SPCC736.11	rad25	ago1	-	csp9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Stoica C (2006)	17043360	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250656	2542029	2539403	278511	275968	SPAC8E11.02c	SPCC736.11	rad24	ago1	anr5|sam4	csp9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Stoica C (2006)	17043360	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250657	2540473	2540645	277001	277170	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC21B10.05c	tor1	pop3	-	wat1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Alvarez B (2006)	17046992	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250658	2540720	2540645	277243	277170	SPBC216.07c	SPBC21B10.05c	tor2	pop3	SPBC646.01c	wat1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Alvarez B (2006)	17046992	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250659	2540645	2540720	277170	277243	SPBC21B10.05c	SPBC216.07c	pop3	tor2	wat1	SPBC646.01c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Alvarez B (2006)	17046992	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250660	2540645	2540473	277170	277001	SPBC21B10.05c	SPBC30D10.10c	pop3	tor1	wat1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Alvarez B (2006)	17046992	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250661	2539845	2540473	276393	277001	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC30D10.10c	ste20	tor1	ste16	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Alvarez B (2006)	17046992	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250662	2540473	2539845	277001	276393	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC12C2.02c	tor1	ste20	-	ste16	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Alvarez B (2006)	17046992	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250663	2540720	2542404	277243	278868	SPBC216.07c	SPAC57A7.11	tor2	mip1	SPBC646.01c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Alvarez B (2006)	17046992	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250664	2542404	2540720	278868	277243	SPAC57A7.11	SPBC216.07c	mip1	tor2	-	SPBC646.01c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Alvarez B (2006)	17046992	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250665	3361400	2543399	280476	279821	SPAC1093.06c	SPAC3G9.12	dhc1	peg1	SPAC30C2.01c	cls1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Grallert A (2006)	16951255	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250666	2543399	3361400	279821	280476	SPAC3G9.12	SPAC1093.06c	peg1	dhc1	cls1	SPAC30C2.01c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Grallert A (2006)	16951255	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250667	2542123	2543399	278599	279821	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC3G9.12	mal3	peg1	-	cls1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Grallert A (2006)	16951255	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250668	2543399	2542123	279821	278599	SPAC3G9.12	SPAC18G6.15	peg1	mal3	cls1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Grallert A (2006)	16951255	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250669	2543044	2543399	279479	279821	SPAC3C7.12	SPAC3G9.12	tip1	peg1	noc1	cls1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Grallert A (2006)	16951255	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250670	2543399	2543044	279821	279479	SPAC3G9.12	SPAC3C7.12	peg1	tip1	cls1	noc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Grallert A (2006)	16951255	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250671	2541727	2542219	278221	278693	SPAC22H10.12c	SPAC18G6.03	gdi1	ypt3	sec19	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ma Y (2006)	16980382	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250672	2540720	2540853	277243	277370	SPBC216.07c	SPBC428.16c	tor2	rhb1	SPBC646.01c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Uritani M (2006)	17121544	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250673	2541257	2540292	277771	276823	SPBP23A10.14c	SPBC28F2.12	ell1	rpb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Banks CA (2007)	17150956	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250674	2541194	2541368	277708	277879	SPBC725.13c	SPBP4H10.21c	psf2	sld5	bsh3|dre13	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yabuuchi H (2006)	16990792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250675	2541194	2541324	277708	277836	SPBC725.13c	SPBP23A10.09	psf2	psf1	bsh3|dre13	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yabuuchi H (2006)	16990792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250676	2541194	2541474	277708	277976	SPBC725.13c	SPAC227.16c	psf2	psf3	bsh3|dre13	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yabuuchi H (2006)	16990792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250677	2543387	2539527	279809	276089	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC338.16	mcl1	pof3	slr3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mamnun YM (2006)	16997270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250678	2539527	2543387	276089	279809	SPCC338.16	SPAPB1E7.02c	pof3	mcl1	-	slr3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mamnun YM (2006)	16997270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250679	2542175	2539649	278650	276204	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC12D12.04c	mkh1	pck2	-	pkc1|sts6	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ma Y (2006)	17005909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250680	2539869	2542045	276415	278526	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC23C11.12	cdc2	hcn1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Yoon HJ (2006)	16950791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	No Modification	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250681	2542358	2542358	278823	278823	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC1782.09c	clp1	clp1	flp1	flp1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Wolfe BA (2006)	16950131	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	No Modification	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250682	2539869	2542358	276415	278823	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC1782.09c	cdc2	clp1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	flp1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Wolfe BA (2006)	16950131	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	No Modification	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250683	2539869	2541193	276415	277707	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC776.02c	cdc2	dis2	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	bws1|sds1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Aoki K (2006)	16920624	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	No Modification	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250684	2542815	2541110	279262	277625	SPAC13D6.01	SPBC646.05c	pof14	erg9	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Tafforeau L (2006)	17016471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250685	2540458	2541628	276986	278124	SPBC29A10.14	SPAC110.02	rec8	pds5	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Ding DQ (2006)	16893973	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250686	2543289	2542029	279714	278511	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC8E11.02c	rad26	rad24	-	anr5|sam4	Co-localization	physical	Baschal EE (2006)	16930478	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250687	2542266	2541165	278735	277680	SPAC17D4.02	SPBC776.12c	cdc45	hsk1	goa1|sna41	cdc7	Co-localization	physical	Yabuuchi H (2006)	16990792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250688	2541194	2541165	277708	277680	SPBC725.13c	SPBC776.12c	psf2	hsk1	bsh3|dre13	cdc7	Co-localization	physical	Yabuuchi H (2006)	16990792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250689	2542628	2541165	279082	277680	SPAC24H6.06	SPBC776.12c	sld3	hsk1	mug175	cdc7	Co-localization	physical	Yabuuchi H (2006)	16990792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250690	2541194	2543281	277708	279708	SPBC725.13c	SPAC23C4.18c	psf2	rad4	bsh3|dre13	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Co-localization	physical	Yabuuchi H (2006)	16990792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250691	2541194	2542628	277708	279082	SPBC725.13c	SPAC24H6.06	psf2	sld3	bsh3|dre13	mug175	Co-localization	physical	Yabuuchi H (2006)	16990792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250692	2541347	2541474	277858	277976	SPBP8B7.14c	SPAC227.16c	dpb2	psf3	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Yabuuchi H (2006)	16990792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250693	2540737	2541474	277260	277976	SPBC19G7.05c	SPAC227.16c	bgs1	psf3	cps1|drc1	-	Co-localization	physical	Yabuuchi H (2006)	16990792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250694	2543281	2541474	279708	277976	SPAC23C4.18c	SPAC227.16c	rad4	psf3	cut5|dpb11|dre3	-	Co-localization	physical	Yabuuchi H (2006)	16990792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250695	2541280	2541474	277793	277976	SPBP23A10.07	SPAC227.16c	rpa2	psf3	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Yabuuchi H (2006)	16990792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250696	2542266	2541474	278735	277976	SPAC17D4.02	SPAC227.16c	cdc45	psf3	goa1|sna41	-	Co-localization	physical	Yabuuchi H (2006)	16990792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250700	2540574	2542106	277101	278582	SPBC409.03	SPAC8E11.03c	swi5	dmc1	-	dmp1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Haruta N (2006)	16921379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250701	2540584	2542106	277110	278582	SPBC28F2.07	SPAC8E11.03c	sfr1	dmc1	dds20|mug13	dmp1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Haruta N (2006)	16921379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250702	2542106	2540574	278582	277101	SPAC8E11.03c	SPBC409.03	dmc1	swi5	dmp1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Haruta N (2006)	16921379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250703	2542106	2540584	278582	277110	SPAC8E11.03c	SPBC28F2.07	dmc1	sfr1	dmp1	dds20|mug13	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Haruta N (2006)	16921379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250704	2540584	2540574	277110	277101	SPBC28F2.07	SPBC409.03	sfr1	swi5	dds20|mug13	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Haruta N (2006)	16921379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250705	2540584	2543580	277110	279995	SPBC28F2.07	SPAC644.14c	sfr1	rad51	dds20|mug13	rhp51	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Haruta N (2006)	16921379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250706	2540574	2540584	277101	277110	SPBC409.03	SPBC28F2.07	swi5	sfr1	-	dds20|mug13	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Haruta N (2006)	16921379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250707	2540574	2543580	277101	279995	SPBC409.03	SPAC644.14c	swi5	rad51	-	rhp51	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Haruta N (2006)	16921379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250708	2543580	2540574	279995	277101	SPAC644.14c	SPBC409.03	rad51	swi5	rhp51	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Haruta N (2006)	16921379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250709	2542123	2540936	278599	277452	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC800.05c	mal3	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Sandblad L (2006)	17190604	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250710	2542815	2539938	279262	276482	SPAC13D6.01	SPBC17D11.05	pof14	tif32	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tafforeau L (2006)	17016471	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250711	2542815	2543229	279262	279657	SPAC13D6.01	SPAC56F8.05c	pof14	mug64	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tafforeau L (2006)	17016471	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250712	2542815	2542085	279262	278562	SPAC13D6.01	SPAC26F1.06	pof14	gpm1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tafforeau L (2006)	17016471	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250713	2542815	2540917	279262	277433	SPAC13D6.01	SPBC409.05	pof14	skp1	-	psh1|sph1	Two-hybrid	physical	Tafforeau L (2006)	17016471	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250714	2542815	2541110	279262	277625	SPAC13D6.01	SPBC646.05c	pof14	erg9	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tafforeau L (2006)	17016471	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250715	2540917	2539764	277433	276315	SPBC409.05	SPBC14F5.04c	skp1	pgk1	psh1|sph1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tafforeau L (2006)	17016471	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250716	2540917	2539142	277433	275714	SPBC409.05	SPCC1827.08c	skp1	pof7	psh1|sph1	SPCC70.11c	Two-hybrid	physical	Tafforeau L (2006)	17016471	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250717	2540917	2540684	277433	277209	SPBC409.05	SPBC776.18c	skp1	pmh1	psh1|sph1	mcr1	Two-hybrid	physical	Tafforeau L (2006)	17016471	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250718	2540917	2539767	277433	276318	SPBC409.05	SPBC1703.06	skp1	pof10	psh1|sph1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tafforeau L (2006)	17016471	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250719	2540917	2543681	277433	280095	SPBC409.05	SPAC9.02c	skp1	SPAC9.02c	psh1|sph1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tafforeau L (2006)	17016471	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250720	2540917	2539154	277433	275726	SPBC409.05	SPCC11E10.07c	skp1	SPCC11E10.07c	psh1|sph1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tafforeau L (2006)	17016471	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250721	2540917	3361538	277433	280614	SPBC409.05	SPAC1705.03c	skp1	ecm33	psh1|sph1	SPAC23H4.19|SPAC1F2.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Tafforeau L (2006)	17016471	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250722	2540917	2541350	277433	277861	SPBC409.05	SPBP4H10.11c	skp1	lcf2	psh1|sph1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tafforeau L (2006)	17016471	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250723	2540917	2539725	277433	276277	SPBC409.05	SPBC17D1.01	skp1	SPBC17D1.01	psh1|sph1	SPBC17D11.09	Two-hybrid	physical	Tafforeau L (2006)	17016471	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250724	2540917	2543382	277433	279804	SPBC409.05	SPAC890.02c	skp1	alp7	psh1|sph1	mia1	Two-hybrid	physical	Tafforeau L (2006)	17016471	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250725	2540917	2540760	277433	277280	SPBC409.05	SPBC21.05c	skp1	ral2	psh1|sph1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tafforeau L (2006)	17016471	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250726	2540917	2543514	277433	279932	SPBC409.05	SPAC4D7.03	skp1	pop2	psh1|sph1	sud1	Two-hybrid	physical	Tafforeau L (2006)	17016471	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250727	2540917	2538838	277433	275419	SPBC409.05	SPCC1682.02c	skp1	mcm3	psh1|sph1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tafforeau L (2006)	17016471	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250728	2540917	2539324	277433	275890	SPBC409.05	SPCC18.04	skp1	pof6	psh1|sph1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tafforeau L (2006)	17016471	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250729	2540917	2542343	277433	278809	SPBC409.05	SPAC16E8.18	skp1	SPAC16E8.18	psh1|sph1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tafforeau L (2006)	17016471	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250730	2540917	2542140	277433	278616	SPBC409.05	SPAC1783.07c	skp1	pap1	psh1|sph1	caf3	Two-hybrid	physical	Tafforeau L (2006)	17016471	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250731	2540917	2543200	277433	279629	SPBC409.05	SPAC3A12.18	skp1	zwf1	psh1|sph1	SPAC9.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Tafforeau L (2006)	17016471	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250732	2540917	2542815	277433	279262	SPBC409.05	SPAC13D6.01	skp1	pof14	psh1|sph1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tafforeau L (2006)	17016471	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250733	2542880	2540285	279325	276816	SPAC6F12.14	SPBC28E12.01c	cut23	apc13	apc8	SPBC9B6.12c	Two-hybrid	physical	Yoon HJ (2006)	16950791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250734	2541592	2542045	278089	278526	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC23C11.12	cut9	hcn1	dre1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Yoon HJ (2006)	16950791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250735	2542615	2543355	279069	279777	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC959.09c	cut20	apc5	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	SPAP32A8.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Yoon HJ (2006)	16950791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250736	2542438	2540307	278900	276837	SPAC17C9.01c	SPBC1A4.01	nuc2	apc10	SPAC1851.01|apc3	SPBC1E8.06	Two-hybrid	physical	Yoon HJ (2006)	16950791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250737	3361204	2543187	280280	279616	SPBP23A10.04	SPAC343.03	apc2	apc11	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Yoon HJ (2006)	16950791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250740	2539838	2539971	276387	276515	SPBC1347.10	SPBC1105.04c	cdc23	cbp1	mcm10	abp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Locovei AM (2006)	17112379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250741	2542123	2542123	278599	278599	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC18G6.15	mal3	mal3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Grallert A (2006)	16951255	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250742	2542123	2543044	278599	279479	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC3C7.12	mal3	tip1	-	noc1	Two-hybrid	physical	Grallert A (2006)	16951255	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250743	2542123	2543399	278599	279821	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC3G9.12	mal3	peg1	-	cls1	Two-hybrid	physical	Grallert A (2006)	16951255	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250744	2543044	2542123	279479	278599	SPAC3C7.12	SPAC18G6.15	tip1	mal3	noc1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Grallert A (2006)	16951255	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250745	2543044	2543044	279479	279479	SPAC3C7.12	SPAC3C7.12	tip1	tip1	noc1	noc1	Two-hybrid	physical	Grallert A (2006)	16951255	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250746	2543044	2543399	279479	279821	SPAC3C7.12	SPAC3G9.12	tip1	peg1	noc1	cls1	Two-hybrid	physical	Grallert A (2006)	16951255	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250747	2539047	2543044	275620	279479	SPCC1223.06	SPAC3C7.12	tea1	tip1	alp8	noc1	Two-hybrid	physical	Grallert A (2006)	16951255	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250748	2543399	2542123	279821	278599	SPAC3G9.12	SPAC18G6.15	peg1	mal3	cls1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Grallert A (2006)	16951255	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250749	2543399	2543044	279821	279479	SPAC3G9.12	SPAC3C7.12	peg1	tip1	cls1	noc1	Two-hybrid	physical	Grallert A (2006)	16951255	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250750	2543399	2543399	279821	279821	SPAC3G9.12	SPAC3G9.12	peg1	peg1	cls1	cls1	Two-hybrid	physical	Grallert A (2006)	16951255	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250751	2539527	2540917	276089	277433	SPCC338.16	SPBC409.05	pof3	skp1	-	psh1|sph1	Two-hybrid	physical	Mamnun YM (2006)	16997270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250752	2539527	2543387	276089	279809	SPCC338.16	SPAPB1E7.02c	pof3	mcl1	-	slr3	Two-hybrid	physical	Mamnun YM (2006)	16997270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250753	2541107	2541159	277622	277674	SPBC646.14c	SPBC685.09	orc5	orc2	-	orp2	Co-purification	physical	Kong D (2001)	11689699	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250754	2541107	2543248	277622	279676	SPBC646.14c	SPAC3H1.01c	orc5	orc3	-	SPAP14E8.06c|orp3	Co-purification	physical	Kong D (2001)	11689699	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250755	2541107	2540470	277622	276998	SPBC646.14c	SPBC29A10.15	orc5	orc1	-	cdc30|orp1|rid1	Co-purification	physical	Kong D (2001)	11689699	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250756	2541107	2540438	277622	276966	SPBC646.14c	SPBC2A9.12	orc5	orc6	-	SPBC2D10.02	Co-purification	physical	Kong D (2001)	11689699	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250757	2541159	2543248	277674	279676	SPBC685.09	SPAC3H1.01c	orc2	orc3	orp2	SPAP14E8.06c|orp3	Co-purification	physical	Lee JK (2001)	11717425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250758	2541159	2540438	277674	276966	SPBC685.09	SPBC2A9.12	orc2	orc6	orp2	SPBC2D10.02	Co-purification	physical	Lee JK (2001)	11717425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250759	2541159	2540470	277674	276998	SPBC685.09	SPBC29A10.15	orc2	orc1	orp2	cdc30|orp1|rid1	Co-purification	physical	Lee JK (2001)	11717425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250760	2541159	2541298	277674	277810	SPBC685.09	SPBP23A10.13	orc2	orc4	orp2	orp4	Co-purification	physical	Lee JK (2001)	11717425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250761	2541159	2541107	277674	277622	SPBC685.09	SPBC646.14c	orc2	orc5	orp2	-	Co-purification	physical	Lee JK (2001)	11717425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250766	2538816	2540547	275397	277074	SPCC1442.10c	SPBC32F12.11	rpb3	tdh1	-	gpd1	Co-purification	physical	Mitsuzawa H (2005)	15620689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250767	2538816	2542225	275397	278698	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC19B12.05c	rpb3	fcp1	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Mitsuzawa H (2005)	15620689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250768	2538816	2539294	275397	275862	SPCC1442.10c	SPCC1620.09c	rpb3	tfg1	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Mitsuzawa H (2005)	15620689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250769	2538816	2539924	275397	276468	SPCC1442.10c	SPBC1198.13c	rpb3	tfg2	-	SPBC660.03c	Co-purification	physical	Mitsuzawa H (2005)	15620689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250770	2538816	2541729	275397	278223	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC22H12.02	rpb3	tfg3	-	taf14	Co-purification	physical	Mitsuzawa H (2005)	15620689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250771	2538816	2543112	275397	279544	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC3A12.07	rpb3	rpb11	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Kimura M (1997)	9325316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250772	2538816	2541446	275397	277951	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC23G3.01	rpb3	rpb2	-	SPAC521.06	Co-purification	physical	Kimura M (1997)	9325316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250773	2540239	2541916	276771	278406	SPBC32H8.10	SPAC23C4.19	cdk9	spt5	SPACTOKYO_453.22	-	Co-purification	physical	Pei Y (2003)	12904290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250775	2540002	2543233	276546	279661	SPBC14C8.06	SPAC630.03	arc1	arp3	sop2	act2	Co-purification	physical	Morrell JL (1999)	10588653	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250776	2540574	2540584	277101	277110	SPBC409.03	SPBC28F2.07	swi5	sfr1	-	dds20|mug13	Co-purification	physical	Haruta N (2006)	16921379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250777	2542558	2541746	279014	278240	SPAC1952.07	SPAC20G4.04c	rad1	hus1	rad19	-	Co-purification	physical	Caspari T (2000)	10648611	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250778	2542558	2543544	279014	279961	SPAC1952.07	SPAC664.07c	rad1	rad9	rad19	-	Co-purification	physical	Caspari T (2000)	10648611	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250779	2542141	2540294	278617	276825	SPAC17C9.05c	SPBC31F10.04c	pmc3	srb4	med27|prk1	med17	Co-purification	physical	Spahr H (2001)	11572939	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250780	2542141	2540292	278617	276823	SPAC17C9.05c	SPBC28F2.12	pmc3	rpb1	med27|prk1	-	Co-purification	physical	Spahr H (2001)	11572939	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250781	2542141	2541925	278617	278413	SPAC17C9.05c	SPAC5D6.05	pmc3	med18	med27|prk1	sep11|pmc6	Co-purification	physical	Spahr H (2001)	11572939	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250782	2540630	2540620	277156	277146	SPBC25D12.03c	SPBC4.04c	mcm7	mcm2	-	cdc19|nda1	Co-purification	physical	Brown GW (1998)	9705352	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250783	2540630	2539164	277156	275735	SPBC25D12.03c	SPCC16A11.17	mcm7	mcm4	-	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Co-purification	physical	Brown GW (1998)	9705352	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250784	2540630	2538838	277156	275419	SPBC25D12.03c	SPCC1682.02c	mcm7	mcm3	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Brown GW (1998)	9705352	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250785	2540630	2540784	277156	277303	SPBC25D12.03c	SPBC211.04c	mcm7	mcm6	-	mis5	Co-purification	physical	Brown GW (1998)	9705352	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250786	2540630	2542477	277156	278937	SPBC25D12.03c	SPAC1B2.05	mcm7	mcm5	-	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	Co-purification	physical	Brown GW (1998)	9705352	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250787	2542097	2538816	278573	275397	SPACUNK4.06c	SPCC1442.10c	rpb7	rpb3	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Co-purification	physical	Sakurai H (1999)	10523639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250788	2542097	2541011	278573	277526	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC337.14	rpb7	rpb4	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Co-purification	physical	Sakurai H (1999)	10523639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250789	2542097	2539794	278573	276344	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC14C8.12	rpb7	rpb8	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Co-purification	physical	Sakurai H (1999)	10523639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250790	2542097	2541470	278573	277972	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAPYUG7.04c	rpb7	rpb9	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Co-purification	physical	Sakurai H (1999)	10523639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250791	2542097	2543112	278573	279544	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC3A12.07	rpb7	rpb11	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Co-purification	physical	Sakurai H (1999)	10523639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250792	2540630	2540620	277156	277146	SPBC25D12.03c	SPBC4.04c	mcm7	mcm2	-	cdc19|nda1	Co-purification	physical	Lee JK (2000)	10770926	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250793	2540630	2539164	277156	275735	SPBC25D12.03c	SPCC16A11.17	mcm7	mcm4	-	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Co-purification	physical	Lee JK (2000)	10770926	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250794	2540630	2538838	277156	275419	SPBC25D12.03c	SPCC1682.02c	mcm7	mcm3	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Lee JK (2000)	10770926	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250795	2540630	2540784	277156	277303	SPBC25D12.03c	SPBC211.04c	mcm7	mcm6	-	mis5	Co-purification	physical	Lee JK (2000)	10770926	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250796	2540630	2542477	277156	278937	SPBC25D12.03c	SPAC1B2.05	mcm7	mcm5	-	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	Co-purification	physical	Lee JK (2000)	10770926	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250797	2539083	2540292	275655	276823	SPCC1020.04c	SPBC28F2.12	rpb6	rpb1	rpo15	-	Co-purification	physical	Sakurai H (1997)	9322754	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250798	2539083	2538816	275655	275397	SPCC1020.04c	SPCC1442.10c	rpb6	rpb3	rpo15	-	Co-purification	physical	Sakurai H (1997)	9322754	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250799	2539083	2540793	275655	277312	SPCC1020.04c	SPBC19C2.03	rpb6	rpc10	rpo15	rpb12	Co-purification	physical	Sakurai H (1997)	9322754	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250800	2539083	2539794	275655	276344	SPCC1020.04c	SPBC14C8.12	rpb6	rpb8	rpo15	-	Co-purification	physical	Sakurai H (1997)	9322754	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250801	2539083	2542097	275655	278573	SPCC1020.04c	SPACUNK4.06c	rpb6	rpb7	rpo15	SPAPYUK71.02	Co-purification	physical	Sakurai H (1997)	9322754	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250802	2539083	2543112	275655	279544	SPCC1020.04c	SPAC3A12.07	rpb6	rpb11	rpo15	-	Co-purification	physical	Sakurai H (1997)	9322754	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250803	2539083	2541446	275655	277951	SPCC1020.04c	SPAC23G3.01	rpb6	rpb2	rpo15	SPAC521.06	Co-purification	physical	Sakurai H (1997)	9322754	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250804	2539083	2541910	275655	278400	SPCC1020.04c	SPAC23C4.15	rpb6	rpb5	rpo15	-	Co-purification	physical	Sakurai H (1997)	9322754	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250805	2539083	2542233	275655	278705	SPCC1020.04c	SPAC1B3.12c	rpb6	rpb10	rpo15	-	Co-purification	physical	Sakurai H (1997)	9322754	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250806	2541587	2539020	278084	275593	SPAC14C4.02c	SPCC5E4.06	smc5	smc6	spr18	rad18	Co-purification	physical	Fousteri MI (2000)	10747036	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250807	2539627	2540008	276184	276552	SPBC1734.02c	SPBC12D12.02c	cdc27	cdm1	SPBC337.18c	-	Co-purification	physical	Zuo S (1997)	9326594	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250808	2539627	2542083	276184	278560	SPBC1734.02c	SPAC27E2.05	cdc27	cdc1	SPBC337.18c	mis1	Co-purification	physical	Zuo S (1997)	9326594	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250809	2539773	2540292	276324	276823	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC28F2.12	med7	rpb1	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Spahr H (2000)	10625684	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250810	2539773	2538816	276324	275397	SPBC14F5.08	SPCC1442.10c	med7	rpb3	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Spahr H (2000)	10625684	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250811	2539773	2539083	276324	275655	SPBC14F5.08	SPCC1020.04c	med7	rpb6	-	rpo15	Co-purification	physical	Spahr H (2000)	10625684	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250812	2539773	2540272	276324	276803	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC31F10.09c	med7	nut2	-	med10	Co-purification	physical	Spahr H (2000)	10625684	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250813	2539773	2540294	276324	276825	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC31F10.04c	med7	srb4	-	med17	Co-purification	physical	Spahr H (2000)	10625684	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250814	2539773	2539994	276324	276538	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC1105.06	med7	pmc4	-	med4	Co-purification	physical	Spahr H (2000)	10625684	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250815	2539773	2542097	276324	278573	SPBC14F5.08	SPACUNK4.06c	med7	rpb7	-	SPAPYUK71.02	Co-purification	physical	Spahr H (2000)	10625684	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250816	2539773	2541925	276324	278413	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC5D6.05	med7	med18	-	sep11|pmc6	Co-purification	physical	Spahr H (2000)	10625684	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250817	2539773	2542516	276324	278974	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC2F7.04	med7	pmc2	-	med1	Co-purification	physical	Spahr H (2000)	10625684	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250818	2539773	2541446	276324	277951	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC23G3.01	med7	rpb2	-	SPAC521.06	Co-purification	physical	Spahr H (2000)	10625684	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250819	2539773	2541910	276324	278400	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC23C4.15	med7	rpb5	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Spahr H (2000)	10625684	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250820	2539773	2543263	276324	279691	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC1002.15c	med7	med6	-	pmc5	Co-purification	physical	Spahr H (2000)	10625684	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250821	2538816	2540292	275397	276823	SPCC1442.10c	SPBC28F2.12	rpb3	rpb1	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Kimura M (2000)	10648788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250822	2538816	2541446	275397	277951	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC23G3.01	rpb3	rpb2	-	SPAC521.06	Co-purification	physical	Kimura M (2000)	10648788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250823	2538816	2543112	275397	279544	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC3A12.07	rpb3	rpb11	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Kimura M (2000)	10648788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250824	2538816	2541910	275397	278400	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC23C4.15	rpb3	rpb5	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Kimura M (2000)	10648788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250825	2538816	2542097	275397	278573	SPCC1442.10c	SPACUNK4.06c	rpb3	rpb7	-	SPAPYUK71.02	Co-purification	physical	Kimura M (2000)	10648788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250826	2538816	2539794	275397	276344	SPCC1442.10c	SPBC14C8.12	rpb3	rpb8	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Kimura M (2000)	10648788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250827	2539790	2542174	276340	278649	SPBC13G1.13	SPAC17A5.06	tfb2	ptr8	SPBC31F10.01	ercc3sp	Co-purification	physical	Tamayo E (2004)	15182371	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250828	2539790	2539194	276340	275765	SPBC13G1.13	SPCC1682.07	tfb2	ssl1	SPBC31F10.01	tfh47	Co-purification	physical	Tamayo E (2004)	15182371	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250829	2539790	2542336	276340	278802	SPBC13G1.13	SPAC16E8.11c	tfb2	tfb1	SPBC31F10.01	-	Co-purification	physical	Tamayo E (2004)	15182371	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250830	2539627	2540008	276184	276552	SPBC1734.02c	SPBC12D12.02c	cdc27	cdm1	SPBC337.18c	-	Co-purification	physical	Bermudez VP (2002)	12124382	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250831	2539627	2542083	276184	278560	SPBC1734.02c	SPAC27E2.05	cdc27	cdc1	SPBC337.18c	mis1	Co-purification	physical	Bermudez VP (2002)	12124382	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250832	2538816	2540292	275397	276823	SPCC1442.10c	SPBC28F2.12	rpb3	rpb1	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Kimura M (2001)	11168400	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250833	2538816	2541011	275397	277526	SPCC1442.10c	SPBC337.14	rpb3	rpb4	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Kimura M (2001)	11168400	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250834	2538816	2540793	275397	277312	SPCC1442.10c	SPBC19C2.03	rpb3	rpc10	-	rpb12	Co-purification	physical	Kimura M (2001)	11168400	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250835	2538816	2539794	275397	276344	SPCC1442.10c	SPBC14C8.12	rpb3	rpb8	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Kimura M (2001)	11168400	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250836	2538816	2541470	275397	277972	SPCC1442.10c	SPAPYUG7.04c	rpb3	rpb9	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Kimura M (2001)	11168400	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250837	2538816	2542097	275397	278573	SPCC1442.10c	SPACUNK4.06c	rpb3	rpb7	-	SPAPYUK71.02	Co-purification	physical	Kimura M (2001)	11168400	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250838	2538816	2543112	275397	279544	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC3A12.07	rpb3	rpb11	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Kimura M (2001)	11168400	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250839	2538816	2541446	275397	277951	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC23G3.01	rpb3	rpb2	-	SPAC521.06	Co-purification	physical	Kimura M (2001)	11168400	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250840	2538816	2541910	275397	278400	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC23C4.15	rpb3	rpb5	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Kimura M (2001)	11168400	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250841	2538816	2542233	275397	278705	SPCC1442.10c	SPAC1B3.12c	rpb3	rpb10	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Kimura M (2001)	11168400	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250842	2540002	2543233	276546	279661	SPBC14C8.06	SPAC630.03	arc1	arp3	sop2	act2	Co-fractionation	physical	Balasubramanian MK (1996)	8978670	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250843	2539675	2540989	276230	277505	SPBC1718.03	SPBC3B9.07c	ker1	rpa43	-	rpa21	Co-fractionation	physical	Imazawa Y (2005)	15647272	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250844	2543040	2541268	279475	277782	SPAC31G5.13	SPBP19A11.03c	rpn11	mts4	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	rpn1	Co-fractionation	physical	Penney M (1998)	9727008	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250845	2539442	2539641	276005	276196	SPCC5E4.04	SPBC14C8.01c	cut1	cut2	ptr4	SPBC1815.02c	Co-fractionation	physical	Nagao K (2006)	16483313	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250846	2541115	2542577	277630	279033	SPBC660.07	SPAC19G12.15c	ntp1	tpp1	-	-	Co-fractionation	physical	Soto T (2002)	12153582	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250847	2541115	2542660	277630	279113	SPBC660.07	SPAC328.03	ntp1	tps1	-	-	Co-fractionation	physical	Soto T (2002)	12153582	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250848	2541089	2543412	277604	279834	SPBC646.09c	SPAC637.07	int6	moe1	yin6	-	Co-fractionation	physical	Bandyopadhyay A (2002)	11705997	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250849	2541446	2543112	277951	279544	SPAC23G3.01	SPAC3A12.07	rpb2	rpb11	SPAC521.06	-	Co-fractionation	physical	Kimura M (1997)	9325316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250850	2541446	2538816	277951	275397	SPAC23G3.01	SPCC1442.10c	rpb2	rpb3	SPAC521.06	-	Co-fractionation	physical	Kimura M (1997)	9325316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250851	2543446	2540051	279866	276589	SPAC4F8.10c	SPBC32H8.12c	stg1	act1	-	cps8|pi012	Co-fractionation	physical	Nakano K (2005)	16256112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250852	2540557	2543010	277084	279448	SPBC29A10.04	SPAC10F6.09c	psm1	psm3	smc1	smc3	Co-fractionation	physical	Sakai A (2003)	12773391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250853	2539511	2540494	276073	277022	SPCC663.01c	SPBC409.04c	ekc1	mis12	SPCC777.16c|eck1	-	Co-fractionation	physical	Goshima G (2003)	12773390	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250854	2539511	2538758	276073	275341	SPCC663.01c	SPCC1739.12	ekc1	ppe1	SPCC777.16c|eck1	esp1|ppx1	Co-fractionation	physical	Goshima G (2003)	12773390	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250855	2539511	2539658	276073	276213	SPCC663.01c	SPBC1105.17	ekc1	cnp1	SPCC777.16c|eck1	sim2	Co-fractionation	physical	Goshima G (2003)	12773390	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250856	2542123	2539857	278599	276404	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC1604.20c	mal3	tea2	-	klp4	Co-fractionation	physical	Browning H (2005)	15665379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250857	2539857	2539857	276404	276404	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC1604.20c	tea2	tea2	klp4	klp4	Co-fractionation	physical	Browning H (2005)	15665379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250858	2542123	2542123	278599	278599	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC18G6.15	mal3	mal3	-	-	Co-fractionation	physical	Browning H (2005)	15665379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250859	2542045	2541592	278526	278089	SPAC23C11.12	SPAC6F12.15c	hcn1	cut9	-	dre1	Co-fractionation	physical	Yoon HJ (2006)	16950791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250860	2542615	2542880	279069	279325	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC6F12.14	cut20	cut23	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	apc8	Co-fractionation	physical	Yoon HJ (2006)	16950791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250861	2539639	2541592	276194	278089	SPBC106.09	SPAC6F12.15c	cut4	cut9	apc1	dre1	Co-fractionation	physical	Yamashita YM (1999)	10526233	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250862	2539639	2542615	276194	279069	SPBC106.09	SPAC19G12.01c	cut4	cut20	apc1	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	Co-fractionation	physical	Yamashita YM (1999)	10526233	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250863	2539639	2542438	276194	278900	SPBC106.09	SPAC17C9.01c	cut4	nuc2	apc1	SPAC1851.01|apc3	Co-fractionation	physical	Yamashita YM (1999)	10526233	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250866	2540660	2540660	277185	277185	SPBC21.06c	SPBC21.06c	cdc7	cdc7	its10|pld1	its10|pld1	Co-fractionation	physical	Mehta S (2006)	16469735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250867	2540236	2541184	276768	277698	SPBC336.09c	SPBC725.17c	rrn7	rrn11	-	-	Co-fractionation	physical	Boukhgalter B (2002)	12095692	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250868	2541727	2543529	278221	279947	SPAC22H10.12c	SPAC4C5.02c	gdi1	ryh1	sec19	hos1|sat7	Co-fractionation	physical	Ma Y (2006)	16980382	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250869	2541727	2542219	278221	278693	SPAC22H10.12c	SPAC18G6.03	gdi1	ypt3	sec19	-	Co-fractionation	physical	Ma Y (2006)	16980382	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250870	2541727	2543280	278221	279707	SPAC22H10.12c	SPAC9E9.07c	gdi1	ypt2	sec19	-	Co-fractionation	physical	Ma Y (2006)	16980382	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250871	2541592	2542438	278089	278900	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC17C9.01c	cut9	nuc2	dre1	SPAC1851.01|apc3	Co-fractionation	physical	Yamada H (1997)	9264466	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250872	2539639	2541592	276194	278089	SPBC106.09	SPAC6F12.15c	cut4	cut9	apc1	dre1	Co-fractionation	physical	Yamashita YM (1996)	8918880	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250873	2539639	2542438	276194	278900	SPBC106.09	SPAC17C9.01c	cut4	nuc2	apc1	SPAC1851.01|apc3	Co-fractionation	physical	Yamashita YM (1996)	8918880	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250874	2542615	2541592	279069	278089	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC6F12.15c	cut20	cut9	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	dre1	Co-fractionation	physical	Berry LD (1999)	10082519	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250875	2539403	2538930	275968	275506	SPCC736.11	SPCC188.13c	ago1	dcr1	csp9	SPCC584.10c	Co-fractionation	physical	Carmichael JB (2006)	16734665	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250876	2539765	2540051	276316	276589	SPBC1778.06c	SPBC32H8.12c	fim1	act1	-	cps8|pi012	Co-fractionation	physical	Nakano K (2001)	11694585	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250877	2541835	2542734	278326	279184	SPAC22E12.08	SPAC29A4.10	rrn10	rrn5	-	-	Co-fractionation	physical	Liu M (2002)	12490702	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250878	2541835	2539310	278326	275877	SPAC22E12.08	SPCC285.17	rrn10	spp27	-	uaf30	Co-fractionation	physical	Liu M (2002)	12490702	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250879	2539960	2539960	276504	276504	SPBC15D4.15	SPBC15D4.15	pho2	pho2	-	-	Co-fractionation	physical	Yang JW (1991)	1645660	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250880	2540398	2541059	276926	277574	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC557.03c	dis3	pim1	rrp44	dcd1|ptr2	Co-fractionation	physical	Noguchi E (1996)	8896453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250881	2540398	2540149	276926	276686	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC1289.03c	dis3	spi1	rrp44	-	Co-fractionation	physical	Noguchi E (1996)	8896453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
250882	2540939	2541268	277455	277782	SPBC4.07c	SPBP19A11.03c	rpt2	mts4	mts2	rpn1	Co-fractionation	physical	Wilkinson CR (1997)	9325304	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
251841	2542266	2538838	278735	275419	SPAC17D4.02	SPCC1682.02c	cdc45	mcm3	goa1|sna41	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Dolan WP (2004)	15338237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
251842	2542266	2540719	278735	277242	SPAC17D4.02	SPBC216.05	cdc45	rad3	goa1|sna41	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dolan WP (2004)	15338237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
251843	2542266	2539087	278735	275659	SPAC17D4.02	SPCC1259.13	cdc45	chk1	goa1|sna41	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dolan WP (2004)	15338237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
259947	2539997	2541726	276541	278220	SPBC1604.14c	SPAC22H10.07	shk1	scd2	orb2|pak1	ral3	Far Western	physical	Chang E (1999)	10567532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
259948	2542337	2541726	278803	278220	SPAC16E8.09	SPAC22H10.07	scd1	scd2	ral1	ral3	Far Western	physical	Chang E (1999)	10567532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
260316	2539036	2540149	275609	276686	SPCC1840.01c	SPBC1289.03c	mog1	spi1	SPCC790.04c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Oki M (2007)	17651922	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
260317	2539036	2543204	275609	279633	SPCC1840.01c	SPAC821.04c	mog1	cid13	SPCC790.04c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Oki M (2007)	17651922	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
260318	2539036	3361521	275609	280597	SPCC1840.01c	SPAC1610.03c	mog1	crp79	SPCC790.04c	meu5	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Oki M (2007)	17651922	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
260319	2539036	2540930	275609	277446	SPCC1840.01c	SPBC354.10	mog1	def1	SPCC790.04c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Oki M (2007)	17651922	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
260320	2539036	2538951	275609	275525	SPCC1840.01c	SPCC297.03	mog1	ssp1	SPCC790.04c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Oki M (2007)	17651922	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
260321	2539036	2542783	275609	279232	SPCC1840.01c	SPAC15F9.03c	mog1	nxt2	SPCC790.04c	SPAC1B9.01c|nft2|ntf2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Oki M (2007)	17651922	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
260533	2541746	2542727	278240	279177	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC26A3.02	hus1	myh1	-	myh	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chang DY (2005)	15533944	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
260535	2542727	2540020	279177	276564	SPAC26A3.02	SPBC16D10.09	myh1	pcn1	myh	pcn	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chang DY (2005)	15533944	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
260536	2541755	2543298	278249	279723	SPAC2F7.11	SPAC6B12.15	nrd1	cpc2	msa2	rkp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Jeong HT (2004)	15277777	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
260538	2540719	2543289	277242	279714	SPBC216.05	SPAC9E9.08	rad3	rad26	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Du LL (2004)	15229228	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
260539	2543281	2540992	279708	277508	SPAC23C4.18c	SPBC342.05	rad4	crb2	cut5|dpb11|dre3	rhp9	Two-hybrid	physical	Du LL (2004)	15229228	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
260540	2539087	2540992	275659	277508	SPCC1259.13	SPBC342.05	chk1	crb2	rad27	rhp9	Two-hybrid	physical	Du LL (2004)	15229228	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
260542	2541726	2542337	278220	278803	SPAC22H10.07	SPAC16E8.09	scd2	scd1	ral3	ral1	Two-hybrid	physical	Chang E (1999)	10567532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
260543	2541726	2539997	278220	276541	SPAC22H10.07	SPBC1604.14c	scd2	shk1	ral3	orb2|pak1	Two-hybrid	physical	Chang E (1999)	10567532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
260545	2543027	2539997	279463	276541	SPAC110.03	SPBC1604.14c	cdc42	shk1	-	orb2|pak1	Two-hybrid	physical	Chang E (1999)	10567532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
260548	2539997	2539997	276541	276541	SPBC1604.14c	SPBC1604.14c	shk1	shk1	orb2|pak1	orb2|pak1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Chang E (1999)	10567532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	Scd2 stimulates Shk1 autophosphorylation activity	-	BIOGRID
260549	2539997	2543027	276541	279463	SPBC1604.14c	SPAC110.03	shk1	cdc42	orb2|pak1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Chang E (1999)	10567532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261382	2543526	5802965	279944	858103	SPAC4A8.15c	SPAC11H11.06	cdc3	arp2	-	SPAC22F8.01	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Morrell JL (1999)	10588653	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
261388	2539399	2540728	275964	277251	SPCC550.13	SPBC216.06c	dfp1	swi1	him1|rad35|dbf4	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sommariva E (2005)	15767681	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to MMS (CID 4156 CHEBI 25255)	-	BIOGRID
261389	2539399	3361323	275964	280399	SPCC550.13	SPBC30D10.04	dfp1	swi3	him1|rad35|dbf4	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sommariva E (2005)	15767681	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to MMS (CID 4156 CHEBI 25255)	-	BIOGRID
261390	2540612	2542285	277138	278753	SPBC1D7.05	SPAC17H9.09c	byr2	ras1	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	ste5	Two-hybrid	physical	Onken B (2006)	16754851	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261391	2540612	2542285	277138	278753	SPBC1D7.05	SPAC17H9.09c	byr2	ras1	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	ste5	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Onken B (2006)	16754851	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261392	2539861	2539462	276408	276025	SPBC16C6.06	SPCC777.13	vps10	vps35	pep1	-	Co-localization	physical	Iwaki T (2006)	16622069	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261393	2541677	2540612	278173	277138	SPAC1565.04c	SPBC1D7.05	ste4	byr2	-	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ramachander R (2002)	12171939	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261394	2540612	2541677	277138	278173	SPBC1D7.05	SPAC1565.04c	byr2	ste4	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ramachander R (2002)	12171939	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261395	2541677	2540612	278173	277138	SPAC1565.04c	SPBC1D7.05	ste4	byr2	-	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ramachander R (2004)	15364564	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261396	2540612	2541677	277138	278173	SPBC1D7.05	SPAC1565.04c	byr2	ste4	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ramachander R (2004)	15364564	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261398	2539399	2541165	275964	277680	SPCC550.13	SPBC776.12c	dfp1	hsk1	him1|rad35|dbf4	cdc7	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Lee JK (2003)	12604790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261399	2539838	2539399	276387	275964	SPBC1347.10	SPCC550.13	cdc23	dfp1	mcm10	him1|rad35|dbf4	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Lee JK (2003)	12604790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261401	2541165	2539399	277680	275964	SPBC776.12c	SPCC550.13	hsk1	dfp1	cdc7	him1|rad35|dbf4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Brown GW (1998)	9705352	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261402	2542285	2540612	278753	277138	SPAC17H9.09c	SPBC1D7.05	ras1	byr2	ste5	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Two-hybrid	physical	Yang P (1998)	9660817	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261403	2540612	2542285	277138	278753	SPBC1D7.05	SPAC17H9.09c	byr2	ras1	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	ste5	Two-hybrid	physical	Yang P (1998)	9660817	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261404	2542285	2540612	278753	277138	SPAC17H9.09c	SPBC1D7.05	ras1	byr2	ste5	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Two-hybrid	physical	Yang P (1999)	10593886	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261405	2540612	2542285	277138	278753	SPBC1D7.05	SPAC17H9.09c	byr2	ras1	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	ste5	Two-hybrid	physical	Yang P (1999)	10593886	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261406	2540612	2542285	277138	278753	SPBC1D7.05	SPAC17H9.09c	byr2	ras1	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	ste5	Two-hybrid	physical	Gilbreth M (1996)	8943016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261407	2541165	2539399	277680	275964	SPBC776.12c	SPCC550.13	hsk1	dfp1	cdc7	him1|rad35|dbf4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Fung AD (2002)	12052858	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261408	2540612	2541677	277138	278173	SPBC1D7.05	SPAC1565.04c	byr2	ste4	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Barr MM (1996)	8816472	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261409	2541677	2540612	278173	277138	SPAC1565.04c	SPBC1D7.05	ste4	byr2	-	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Two-hybrid	physical	Barr MM (1996)	8816472	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261410	2542285	2540612	278753	277138	SPAC17H9.09c	SPBC1D7.05	ras1	byr2	ste5	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Two-hybrid	physical	Barr MM (1996)	8816472	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261411	2540612	2542285	277138	278753	SPBC1D7.05	SPAC17H9.09c	byr2	ras1	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	ste5	Two-hybrid	physical	Barr MM (1996)	8816472	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261412	2541677	2540612	278173	277138	SPAC1565.04c	SPBC1D7.05	ste4	byr2	-	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Barr MM (1996)	8816472	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261413	2541165	2539399	277680	275964	SPBC776.12c	SPCC550.13	hsk1	dfp1	cdc7	him1|rad35|dbf4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ogino K (2001)	11402029	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261414	2539399	2541165	275964	277680	SPCC550.13	SPBC776.12c	dfp1	hsk1	him1|rad35|dbf4	cdc7	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ogino K (2001)	11402029	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261415	2539914	5802917	276458	858055	SPBC12D12.01	SPAC17A2.14	sad1	SPAC17A2.14	SPBC16H5.01c	SPAC17G6.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Miki F (2004)	14655046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261416	2539399	2541633	275964	278129	SPCC550.13	SPAC664.01c	dfp1	swi6	him1|rad35|dbf4	SPAC824.10c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bailis JM (2003)	14625560	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261417	2542387	2539399	278851	275964	SPAC17H9.20	SPCC550.13	psc3	dfp1	SPAC607.01	him1|rad35|dbf4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bailis JM (2003)	14625560	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261418	2540612	2542029	277138	278511	SPBC1D7.05	SPAC8E11.02c	byr2	rad24	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	anr5|sam4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ozoe F (2002)	12242289	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261419	2540612	2542252	277138	278722	SPBC1D7.05	SPAC17A2.13c	byr2	rad25	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ozoe F (2002)	12242289	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261420	2540612	2542029	277138	278511	SPBC1D7.05	SPAC8E11.02c	byr2	rad24	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	anr5|sam4	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ozoe F (2002)	12242289	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261421	2540612	2542252	277138	278722	SPBC1D7.05	SPAC17A2.13c	byr2	rad25	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ozoe F (2002)	12242289	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261422	2539399	2541165	275964	277680	SPCC550.13	SPBC776.12c	dfp1	hsk1	him1|rad35|dbf4	cdc7	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Brown GW (1999)	10411894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261423	2539399	2541165	275964	277680	SPCC550.13	SPBC776.12c	dfp1	hsk1	him1|rad35|dbf4	cdc7	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Takeda T (1999)	10409743	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261424	2539399	2541165	275964	277680	SPCC550.13	SPBC776.12c	dfp1	hsk1	him1|rad35|dbf4	cdc7	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Takeda T (1999)	10409743	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261425	2540612	2540612	277138	277138	SPBC1D7.05	SPBC1D7.05	byr2	byr2	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Two-hybrid	physical	Tu H (1999)	9858584	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261426	2540612	2540612	277138	277138	SPBC1D7.05	SPBC1D7.05	byr2	byr2	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Two-hybrid	physical	Tu H (1997)	9315645	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261428	2540612	2542285	277138	278753	SPBC1D7.05	SPAC17H9.09c	byr2	ras1	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	ste5	Two-hybrid	physical	Tu H (1997)	9315645	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261429	2540612	2541677	277138	278173	SPBC1D7.05	SPAC1565.04c	byr2	ste4	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tu H (1997)	9315645	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261430	2542137	2540612	278613	277138	SPAC1D4.13	SPBC1D7.05	byr1	byr2	ste1|ste3	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Two-hybrid	physical	Tu H (1997)	9315645	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261431	2539236	2541446	275806	277951	SPCC1672.08c	SPAC23G3.01	tfa2	rpb2	-	SPAC521.06	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Hayashi K (2005)	15743411	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261432	2539236	2540292	275806	276823	SPCC1672.08c	SPBC28F2.12	tfa2	rpb1	-	-	Far Western	physical	Hayashi K (2005)	15743411	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261433	2539236	2541446	275806	277951	SPCC1672.08c	SPAC23G3.01	tfa2	rpb2	-	SPAC521.06	Far Western	physical	Hayashi K (2005)	15743411	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261434	2541910	2539236	278400	275806	SPAC23C4.15	SPCC1672.08c	rpb5	tfa2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hayashi K (2005)	15743411	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261435	2540793	2539236	277312	275806	SPBC19C2.03	SPCC1672.08c	rpc10	tfa2	rpb12	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hayashi K (2005)	15743411	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261436	2540612	2542285	277138	278753	SPBC1D7.05	SPAC17H9.09c	byr2	ras1	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	ste5	Two-hybrid	physical	Goldar MM (2005)	16273369	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261437	2540728	2539399	277251	275964	SPBC216.06c	SPCC550.13	swi1	dfp1	-	him1|rad35|dbf4	Two-hybrid	physical	Matsumoto S (2005)	16263721	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261438	2540728	2539399	277251	275964	SPBC216.06c	SPCC550.13	swi1	dfp1	-	him1|rad35|dbf4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Matsumoto S (2005)	16263721	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261439	2539659	5802965	276214	858103	SPBC146.13c	SPAC11H11.06	myo1	arp2	-	SPAC22F8.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sirotkin V (2005)	16087707	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261440	2539399	2541165	275964	277680	SPCC550.13	SPBC776.12c	dfp1	hsk1	him1|rad35|dbf4	cdc7	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lee JK (2003)	12604790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261441	2540002	5802965	276546	858103	SPBC14C8.06	SPAC11H11.06	arc1	arp2	sop2	SPAC22F8.01	Co-purification	physical	Morrell JL (1999)	10588653	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
261454	2540612	2542285	277138	278753	SPBC1D7.05	SPAC17H9.09c	byr2	ras1	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	ste5	Two-hybrid	physical	Jeong HT (2004)	15277777	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264258	2540917	2540244	277433	276776	SPBC409.05	SPBC336.01	skp1	fbh1	psh1|sph1	fdh|fdh1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sakaguchi C (2008)	18312697	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264268	2540761	2540294	277281	276825	SPBC21.04	SPBC31F10.04c	med8	srb4	sep15	med17	Co-purification	physical	Linder T (2008)	18310102	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264269	2540761	2542421	277281	278884	SPBC21.04	SPAC17G8.05	med8	med20	sep15	-	Co-purification	physical	Linder T (2008)	18310102	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264270	2540761	2542141	277281	278617	SPBC21.04	SPAC17C9.05c	med8	pmc3	sep15	med27|prk1	Co-purification	physical	Linder T (2008)	18310102	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264271	2540761	2542516	277281	278974	SPBC21.04	SPAC2F7.04	med8	pmc2	sep15	med1	Co-purification	physical	Linder T (2008)	18310102	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264272	2540761	2541925	277281	278413	SPBC21.04	SPAC5D6.05	med8	med18	sep15	sep11|pmc6	Co-purification	physical	Linder T (2008)	18310102	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264273	2539773	2541925	276324	278413	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC5D6.05	med7	med18	-	sep11|pmc6	Co-purification	physical	Linder T (2008)	18310102	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264274	2539773	2542421	276324	278884	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC17G8.05	med7	med20	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Linder T (2008)	18310102	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264275	2539773	2542141	276324	278617	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC17C9.05c	med7	pmc3	-	med27|prk1	Co-purification	physical	Linder T (2008)	18310102	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264276	2539773	2539504	276324	276067	SPBC14F5.08	SPCP31B10.03c	med7	med31	-	sep10|soh1	Co-purification	physical	Linder T (2008)	18310102	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264277	2539773	2540294	276324	276825	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC31F10.04c	med7	srb4	-	med17	Co-purification	physical	Linder T (2008)	18310102	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264278	2543526	2541603	279944	278100	SPAC4A8.15c	SPAC1F5.04c	cdc3	cdc12	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Yonetani A (2008)	18305104	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264279	2541033	2542503	277548	278961	SPBC3B9.21	SPAC19A8.12	dcp1	dcp2	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	She M (2008)	18280239	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264280	2539952	2540887	276496	277404	SPBC1709.14	SPBC4F6.15c	SPBC1709.14	swi10	-	rad23	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Xin F (2008)	18279662	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264305	2541652	2540329	278148	276859	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC29B5.01	sty1	atf1	phh1|spc1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lopez-Aviles S (2008)	18272791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264306	2539027	2542632	275600	279086	SPCC1322.08	SPAC24H6.05	srk1	cdc25	mkp1	sal2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lopez-Aviles S (2008)	18272791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264307	2539027	2541652	275600	278148	SPCC1322.08	SPAC24B11.06c	srk1	sty1	mkp1	phh1|spc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lopez-Aviles S (2008)	18272791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264335	2543027	2542635	279463	279089	SPAC110.03	SPAC24H6.09	cdc42	gef1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Pinar M (2008)	18256290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
264336	2543027	2540856	279463	277373	SPAC110.03	SPBC4F6.12	cdc42	pxl1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Pinar M (2008)	18256290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
264337	2543027	2542337	279463	278803	SPAC110.03	SPAC16E8.09	cdc42	scd1	-	ral1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Pinar M (2008)	18256290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
264338	2540856	2541612	277373	278109	SPBC4F6.12	SPAC1F7.04	pxl1	rho1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Pinar M (2008)	18256290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264339	2539707	2540856	276260	277373	SPBC17F3.01c	SPBC4F6.12	rga5	pxl1	SPBC557.01	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Pinar M (2008)	18256290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation	double mutants have a higher percentage of septating cells	-	BIOGRID
264340	2540856	2541612	277373	278109	SPBC4F6.12	SPAC1F7.04	pxl1	rho1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Pinar M (2008)	18256290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation	double mutants have a higher percentage of septating cells	-	BIOGRID
264341	2540856	2539437	277373	276000	SPBC4F6.12	SPCC645.06c	pxl1	rgf3	-	lad1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Pinar M (2008)	18256290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation	double mutants have a higher percentage of septating cells	-	BIOGRID
264342	2539437	2540856	276000	277373	SPCC645.06c	SPBC4F6.12	rgf3	pxl1	lad1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Pinar M (2008)	18256290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:wild type	double mutants have a higher percentage of septating cells	-	BIOGRID
264343	2540856	2543545	277373	279962	SPBC4F6.12	SPAC926.03	pxl1	rlc1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Pinar M (2008)	18256290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264344	2540856	2541975	277373	278460	SPBC4F6.12	SPAC20G8.05c	pxl1	cdc15	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Pinar M (2008)	18256290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264345	2542894	2539123	279338	275695	SPAC144.17c	SPCC18B5.03	SPAC144.17c	wee1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Fernandez de Mattos S (2008)	17900713	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:wild type	Multisepted phenotype	-	BIOGRID
264346	2541193	2539179	277707	275750	SPBC776.02c	SPCC31H12.05c	dis2	sds21	bws1|sds1	-	Co-localization	physical	Alvarez-Tabares I (2007)	17895368	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264347	2540856	2541975	277373	278460	SPBC4F6.12	SPAC20G8.05c	pxl1	cdc15	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pinar M (2008)	18256290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
264348	2540856	2539513	277373	276075	SPBC4F6.12	SPCC645.05c	pxl1	myo2	-	rng5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pinar M (2008)	18256290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
264349	2540735	2539403	277258	275968	SPBC83.03c	SPCC736.11	tas3	ago1	-	csp9	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Till S (2007)	17891150	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Both proteins purified.	-	BIOGRID
264355	2540856	2542510	277373	278968	SPBC4F6.12	SPAC1851.04c	pxl1	ric1	-	SPAC27D7.01c|sat4|vas3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pinar M (2008)	18256290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
264356	2540856	2541699	277373	278195	SPBC4F6.12	SPAP8A3.08	pxl1	cdc4	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Pinar M (2008)	18256290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
264357	2540856	2543129	277373	279561	SPBC4F6.12	SPAC4F8.13c	pxl1	rng2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Pinar M (2008)	18256290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
264358	2540856	2540737	277373	277260	SPBC4F6.12	SPBC19G7.05c	pxl1	bgs1	-	cps1|drc1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Pinar M (2008)	18256290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
264359	2542761	2541936	279211	278423	SPAC1565.06c	SPAC222.10c	spg1	byr4	sid3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Krapp A (2008)	18252797	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264364	2539723	2540106	276276	276643	SPBC1347.01c	SPBC12D12.09	rev1	rev7	SPBC215.16c	SPAC12D12.09	Two-hybrid	physical	Kosarek JN (2008)	18242152	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264368	2543327	2543580	279750	279995	SPAC1D4.06c	SPAC644.14c	csk1	rad51	-	rhp51	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Gerber HB (2008)	18231579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	-	-	BIOGRID
264369	2542007	2543327	278490	279750	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC1D4.06c	rad57	csk1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gerber HB (2008)	18231579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
264371	2543327	2540239	279750	276771	SPAC1D4.06c	SPBC32H8.10	csk1	cdk9	-	SPACTOKYO_453.22	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gerber HB (2008)	18231579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
264372	2542761	2540660	279211	277185	SPAC1565.06c	SPBC21.06c	spg1	cdc7	sid3	its10|pld1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chew TG (2008)	18225957	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264373	2542438	2542409	278900	278873	SPAC17C9.01c	SPAC17G8.10c	nuc2	dma1	SPAC1851.01|apc3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chew TG (2008)	18225957	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
264427	2543339	2540853	279762	277370	SPAC630.13c	SPBC428.16c	tsc2	rhb1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Aspuria PJ (2008)	18219492	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient uptake:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
264428	2541059	2543382	277574	279804	SPBC557.03c	SPAC890.02c	pim1	alp7	dcd1|ptr2	mia1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Zheng L (2007)	17579515	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
264429	2542070	2540825	278547	277343	SPAC29B12.02c	SPBC428.08c	set2	clr4	kmt3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chen ES (2008)	18216783	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
264430	2542537	2540526	278994	277054	SPAC19D5.04	SPBC26H8.01	ptr1	thi2	-	nmt2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Vogl C (2008)	18201975	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
264433	854659	2541178	34845	277692	YIL147C	SPBC725.02	SLN1	mpr1	YPD2|L000001916	spy1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Tan H (2007)	17559414	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264434	2541178	2541209	277692	277723	SPBC725.02	SPBC887.10	mpr1	mcs4	spy1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Tan H (2007)	17559414	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264435	2542041	2541178	278522	277692	SPAC27E2.09	SPBC725.02	mak2	mpr1	phk1	spy1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Tan H (2007)	17559414	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264436	2541178	2542119	277692	278595	SPBC725.02	SPAC1834.08	mpr1	mak1	spy1	phk3	Two-hybrid	physical	Tan H (2007)	17559414	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264437	2541178	2539117	277692	275689	SPBC725.02	SPCC74.06	mpr1	mak3	spy1	phk2	Two-hybrid	physical	Tan H (2007)	17559414	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264438	2541178	2541209	277692	277723	SPBC725.02	SPBC887.10	mpr1	mcs4	spy1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tan H (2007)	17559414	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264439	2541178	2541756	277692	278250	SPBC725.02	SPAC8C9.14	mpr1	prr1	spy1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tan H (2007)	17559414	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264440	2540735	2539403	277258	275968	SPBC83.03c	SPCC736.11	tas3	ago1	-	csp9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Partridge JF (2007)	17531816	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264441	2542239	2539403	278711	275968	SPAC18G6.02c	SPCC736.11	chp1	ago1	-	csp9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Partridge JF (2007)	17531816	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264442	2540735	2539403	277258	275968	SPBC83.03c	SPCC736.11	tas3	ago1	-	csp9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Partridge JF (2007)	17531816	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	Phenotype: Centromeric transcript accumulation	-	BIOGRID
264443	2542513	2542170	278971	278645	SPAC1952.05	SPAC17G8.13c	gcn5	mst2	kat2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hirota K (2008)	18199689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic recombination	-	-	BIOGRID
264444	2542170	2542513	278645	278971	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC1952.05	mst2	gcn5	-	kat2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hirota K (2008)	18199689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic recombination	-	-	BIOGRID
264445	2543064	2538881	279497	275460	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC1620.14c	hrp3	snf22	-	SPCC830.01c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hirota K (2008)	18199689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic recombination	-	-	BIOGRID
264446	2542513	2542170	278971	278645	SPAC1952.05	SPAC17G8.13c	gcn5	mst2	kat2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Hirota K (2008)	18199689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic recombination:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
264448	2542162	2540292	278638	276823	SPAC6F6.08c	SPBC28F2.12	cdc16	rpb1	bub2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Karagiannis J (2007)	17502918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	the rpb1-12xS2ACTD strain, unlike rpb1-12xCTD, was able to suppress the lethal multi-septate phenotype conferred by the cdc16-116 mutation	-	BIOGRID
264449	2540292	2540624	276823	277150	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC24C6.07	rpb1	cdc14	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Karagiannis J (2007)	17502918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	the rpb1-12xS2ACTD mutant displayed synthetically lethal genetic interactions with ts mutations in the SIN component cdc14 at the semi-permissive temperature of 30	-	BIOGRID
264450	2540150	2542250	276687	278720	SPBC16E9.14c	SPAC17D4.03c	zrg17	cis4	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Fang Y (2008)	18199682	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264451	2542250	2542219	278720	278693	SPAC17D4.03c	SPAC18G6.03	cis4	ypt3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Fang Y (2008)	18199682	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|temperature sensitive growth|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
264452	2542219	2542250	278693	278720	SPAC18G6.03	SPAC17D4.03c	ypt3	cis4	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Fang Y (2008)	18199682	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell wall morphology	-	-	BIOGRID
264453	2543544	2540648	279961	277173	SPAC664.07c	SPBC1921.05	rad9	ape2	-	ape1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Gembka A (2007)	17426133	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Both proteins purified.	-	BIOGRID
264454	2542558	2540648	279014	277173	SPAC1952.07	SPBC1921.05	rad1	ape2	rad19	ape1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Gembka A (2007)	17426133	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Both proteins purified.	-	BIOGRID
264455	2541746	2540648	278240	277173	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC1921.05	hus1	ape2	-	ape1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Gembka A (2007)	17426133	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Both proteins purified.	-	BIOGRID
264456	2543544	2540648	279961	277173	SPAC664.07c	SPBC1921.05	rad9	ape2	-	ape1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gembka A (2007)	17426133	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264457	2539232	2539186	275802	275757	SPCC1223.04c	SPCC16C4.13c	set11	rpl1201	mug76	rpl12-1|rpl12.1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Sadaie M (2008)	18195021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Methylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264459	2542622	2539102	279076	275674	SPAC18B11.07c	SPCC1919.15	rhp6	brl1	sng1|ubc2	SPCC790.01|rfp2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Tanny JC (2007)	17374714	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264460	2542622	2539307	279076	275874	SPAC18B11.07c	SPCC970.10c	rhp6	brl2	sng1|ubc2	rfp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Tanny JC (2007)	17374714	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264472	2539971	2540821	276515	277339	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC800.03	cbp1	clr3	abp1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Cam HP (2008)	18094683	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264473	2539971	2540368	276515	276897	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC36.05c	cbp1	clr6	abp1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Cam HP (2008)	18094683	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264474	2543290	2539971	279715	276515	SPAC9E9.10c	SPBC1105.04c	cbh1	cbp1	cbh	abp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Cam HP (2008)	18094683	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264475	2539728	2539971	276280	276515	SPBC14F5.12c	SPBC1105.04c	cbh2	cbp1	-	abp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Cam HP (2008)	18094683	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264476	2539971	2540219	276515	276752	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC31F10.13c	cbp1	hip1	abp1	hir1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Cam HP (2008)	18094683	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	transposable element transposition	-	-	BIOGRID
264477	2540219	2539971	276752	276515	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC1105.04c	hip1	cbp1	hir1	abp1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Cam HP (2008)	18094683	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	transposable element transposition	-	-	BIOGRID
264478	2540159	2542724	276694	279175	SPBC12C2.08	SPAC767.01c	dnm1	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Jourdain I (2008)	18088324	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	peroxisomal morphology	-	-	BIOGRID
264479	2542724	2540159	279175	276694	SPAC767.01c	SPBC12C2.08	vps1	dnm1	SPAC9G1.14c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Jourdain I (2008)	18088324	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	peroxisomal morphology	-	-	BIOGRID
264495	2542615	2539639	279069	276194	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBC106.09	cut20	cut4	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	apc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ohi MD (2007)	18082611	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264496	2542615	3361204	279069	280280	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBP23A10.04	cut20	apc2	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ohi MD (2007)	18082611	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264497	2542615	2542438	279069	278900	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC17C9.01c	cut20	nuc2	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	SPAC1851.01|apc3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ohi MD (2007)	18082611	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264498	2542615	2543355	279069	279777	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC959.09c	cut20	apc5	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	SPAP32A8.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ohi MD (2007)	18082611	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264499	2542615	2541592	279069	278089	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC6F12.15c	cut20	cut9	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	dre1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ohi MD (2007)	18082611	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264500	2542615	2542880	279069	279325	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC6F12.14	cut20	cut23	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	apc8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ohi MD (2007)	18082611	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264501	2542615	2540307	279069	276837	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBC1A4.01	cut20	apc10	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	SPBC1E8.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ohi MD (2007)	18082611	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264502	2542615	2543187	279069	279616	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC343.03	cut20	apc11	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ohi MD (2007)	18082611	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264503	2542615	2542045	279069	278526	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC23C11.12	cut20	hcn1	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ohi MD (2007)	18082611	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264504	2542615	2540285	279069	276816	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBC28E12.01c	cut20	apc13	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	SPBC9B6.12c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ohi MD (2007)	18082611	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264505	2542615	2542211	279069	278685	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC27D7.05c	cut20	apc14	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	omt1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ohi MD (2007)	18082611	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264506	2542615	2540655	279069	277180	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBC83.04	cut20	apc15	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ohi MD (2007)	18082611	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264507	2542615	2539669	279069	276224	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBC11C11.04c	cut20	alp1	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ohi MD (2007)	18082611	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264508	2542615	2540589	279069	277115	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBC20F10.06	cut20	mad2	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ohi MD (2007)	18082611	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264509	2542615	2539219	279069	275789	SPAC19G12.01c	SPCC1795.01c	cut20	mad3	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	SPCC895.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ohi MD (2007)	18082611	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264510	2541592	2541592	278089	278089	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC6F12.15c	cut9	cut9	dre1	dre1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ohi MD (2007)	18082611	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264511	2542880	2542880	279325	279325	SPAC6F12.14	SPAC6F12.14	cut23	cut23	apc8	apc8	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ohi MD (2007)	18082611	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264512	2542438	2542438	278900	278900	SPAC17C9.01c	SPAC17C9.01c	nuc2	nuc2	SPAC1851.01|apc3	SPAC1851.01|apc3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ohi MD (2007)	18082611	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264513	2540473	2539845	277001	276393	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC12C2.02c	tor1	ste20	-	ste16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2007)	18076573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264514	2540473	2542972	277001	279411	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAPYUG7.02c	tor1	sin1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2007)	18076573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264515	2540473	2538963	277001	275537	SPBC30D10.10c	SPCC777.08c	tor1	bit61	-	SPCC777.08	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2007)	18076573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264516	2540473	2540645	277001	277170	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC21B10.05c	tor1	pop3	-	wat1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2007)	18076573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264517	2540473	2539480	277001	276043	SPBC30D10.10c	SPCC622.13c	tor1	tti1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2007)	18076573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264518	2540473	2543639	277001	280053	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC458.03	tor1	tel2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2007)	18076573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264519	2540473	2541972	277001	278457	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC23C11.11	tor1	cka1	-	orb5	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2007)	18076573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264520	2540720	2541310	277243	277822	SPBC216.07c	SPBP18G5.03	tor2	toc1	SPBC646.01c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2007)	18076573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264521	2540720	2538993	277243	275567	SPBC216.07c	SPCC162.12	tor2	tco89	SPBC646.01c	SPCC1753.06c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2007)	18076573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264522	2540720	2542404	277243	278868	SPBC216.07c	SPAC57A7.11	tor2	mip1	SPBC646.01c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2007)	18076573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264523	2540720	2540645	277243	277170	SPBC216.07c	SPBC21B10.05c	tor2	pop3	SPBC646.01c	wat1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2007)	18076573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264524	2540720	2539480	277243	276043	SPBC216.07c	SPCC622.13c	tor2	tti1	SPBC646.01c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2007)	18076573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264525	2540720	2543639	277243	280053	SPBC216.07c	SPAC458.03	tor2	tel2	SPBC646.01c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2007)	18076573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264526	2540720	2541972	277243	278457	SPBC216.07c	SPAC23C11.11	tor2	cka1	SPBC646.01c	orb5	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2007)	18076573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264527	2540720	2543639	277243	280053	SPBC216.07c	SPAC458.03	tor2	tel2	SPBC646.01c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hayashi T (2007)	18076573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264528	2540473	2543639	277001	280053	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC458.03	tor1	tel2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hayashi T (2007)	18076573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264529	2543639	2539480	280053	276043	SPAC458.03	SPCC622.13c	tel2	tti1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2007)	18076573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264530	2543639	2539771	280053	276322	SPAC458.03	SPBC1604.17c	tel2	tti2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2007)	18076573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264531	2543639	2541265	280053	277779	SPAC458.03	SPBP16F5.03c	tel2	tra1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2007)	18076573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264532	2543639	2540720	280053	277243	SPAC458.03	SPBC216.07c	tel2	tor2	-	SPBC646.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2007)	18076573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264533	2543639	2540645	280053	277170	SPAC458.03	SPBC21B10.05c	tel2	pop3	-	wat1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2007)	18076573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264534	2543639	2540473	280053	277001	SPAC458.03	SPBC30D10.10c	tel2	tor1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2007)	18076573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264535	2543639	2540719	280053	277242	SPAC458.03	SPBC216.05	tel2	rad3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2007)	18076573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264536	2543639	2539209	280053	275779	SPAC458.03	SPCC23B6.03c	tel2	tel1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2007)	18076573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264537	2543639	2541659	280053	278155	SPAC458.03	SPAC1F5.11c	tel2	tra2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2007)	18076573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264569	2543372	2543399	279794	279821	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC3G9.12	ase1	peg1	-	cls1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bratman SV (2007)	18061564	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264570	2543399	2543372	279821	279794	SPAC3G9.12	SPAPB1A10.09	peg1	ase1	cls1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bratman SV (2007)	18061564	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264571	2543399	2543372	279821	279794	SPAC3G9.12	SPAPB1A10.09	peg1	ase1	cls1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Bratman SV (2007)	18061564	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264572	2543372	2543399	279794	279821	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC3G9.12	ase1	peg1	-	cls1	Two-hybrid	physical	Bratman SV (2007)	18061564	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264573	2543372	2543372	279794	279794	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAPB1A10.09	ase1	ase1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Bratman SV (2007)	18061564	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264574	2542461	2542461	278922	278922	SPAC19A8.13	SPAC19A8.13	usp101	usp101	snp1	snp1	Co-purification	physical	Newo AN (2007)	17264129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264575	2542461	2540865	278922	277382	SPAC19A8.13	SPBC4B4.07c	usp101	usp102	snp1	mud1|U1A	Co-purification	physical	Newo AN (2007)	17264129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264576	2542461	2541289	278922	277802	SPAC19A8.13	SPBP35G2.09	usp101	usp103	snp1	yhc1	Co-purification	physical	Newo AN (2007)	17264129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264577	2542461	2543409	278922	279831	SPAC19A8.13	SPAC4D7.13	usp101	usp104	snp1	prp40	Co-purification	physical	Newo AN (2007)	17264129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264578	2542461	2540869	278922	277386	SPAC19A8.13	SPBC4B4.09	usp101	usp105	snp1	prp39	Co-purification	physical	Newo AN (2007)	17264129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264579	2542461	2539055	278922	275628	SPAC19A8.13	SPCC16A11.13	usp101	luc7	snp1	usp106	Co-purification	physical	Newo AN (2007)	17264129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264580	2542461	2541487	278922	277989	SPAC19A8.13	SPAC23D3.08	usp101	usp108	snp1	-	Co-purification	physical	Newo AN (2007)	17264129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264581	2542461	2540117	278922	276654	SPAC19A8.13	SPBC1289.12	usp101	usp109	snp1	-	Co-purification	physical	Newo AN (2007)	17264129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264582	2542461	2542684	278922	279137	SPAC19A8.13	SPAC26A3.08	usp101	smb1	snp1	smb	Co-purification	physical	Newo AN (2007)	17264129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264583	2542461	2542690	278922	279143	SPAC19A8.13	SPAC27D7.07c	usp101	smd1	snp1	-	Co-purification	physical	Newo AN (2007)	17264129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264584	2542461	2542480	278922	278940	SPAC19A8.13	SPAC2C4.03c	usp101	smd2	snp1	cwf9	Co-purification	physical	Newo AN (2007)	17264129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264585	2542461	2540884	278922	277401	SPAC19A8.13	SPBC19C2.14	usp101	smd3	snp1	-	Co-purification	physical	Newo AN (2007)	17264129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264586	2542461	2539607	278922	276165	SPAC19A8.13	SPBC11G11.06c	usp101	sme1	snp1	-	Co-purification	physical	Newo AN (2007)	17264129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264587	2542461	2540330	278922	276860	SPAC19A8.13	SPBC3E7.14	usp101	smf1	snp1	SPBC4F6.01	Co-purification	physical	Newo AN (2007)	17264129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264588	2542461	2540855	278922	277372	SPAC19A8.13	SPBC4B4.05	usp101	smg1	snp1	-	Co-purification	physical	Newo AN (2007)	17264129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264589	2542461	2541211	278922	277725	SPAC19A8.13	SPBC839.10	usp101	usp107	snp1	snu71	Co-purification	physical	Newo AN (2007)	17264129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264590	2541957	2540643	278444	277168	SPAC23C11.16	SPBC19G7.06	plo1	mbx1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Papadopoulou K (2008)	18057023	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264591	2541957	2542492	278444	278951	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC1B9.02c	plo1	sck1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Papadopoulou K (2008)	18057023	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264592	2541957	2540643	278444	277168	SPAC23C11.16	SPBC19G7.06	plo1	mbx1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Papadopoulou K (2008)	18057023	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264593	2541957	2540643	278444	277168	SPAC23C11.16	SPBC19G7.06	plo1	mbx1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Papadopoulou K (2008)	18057023	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264594	2543041	2541815	279476	278306	SPAC3C7.11c	SPAC22A12.15c	cnx1	bip1	cal1	bip	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hajjar F (2007)	17230581	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264595	2540866	2539703	277383	276256	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC16G5.15c	sep1	fkh2	SPBC4C3.05	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Papadopoulou K (2008)	18057023	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264596	2540866	2539703	277383	276256	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC16G5.15c	sep1	fkh2	SPBC4C3.05	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Papadopoulou K (2008)	18057023	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264612	2540481	2541030	277009	277545	SPBC2D10.12	SPBC337.08c	rhp23	ubi4	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Andersen KM (2007)	17211518	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Both proteins purified	-	BIOGRID
264835	2543393	2541521	279815	278022	SPAC4G9.08c	SPAC22A12.05	rpc2	rpc11	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yee NS (2007)	18044988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264836	2541580	2543086	278077	279519	SPAC1687.05	SPAC30D11.10	pli1	rad52	-	rad22|rad22A	Biochemical Activity	physical	Watts FZ (2007)	18031226	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Sumoylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264837	2541580	2540032	278077	276575	SPAC1687.05	SPBC1703.14c	pli1	top1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Watts FZ (2007)	18031226	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Sumoylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264838	2541580	2539020	278077	275593	SPAC1687.05	SPCC5E4.06	pli1	smc6	-	rad18	Biochemical Activity	physical	Watts FZ (2007)	18031226	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Sumoylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264839	2541580	2541620	278077	278117	SPAC1687.05	SPAC2G11.12	pli1	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Biochemical Activity	physical	Watts FZ (2007)	18031226	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Sumoylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264840	2541580	2539881	278077	276427	SPAC1687.05	SPBC16G5.12c	pli1	top3	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Watts FZ (2007)	18031226	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Sumoylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264841	2541580	2539090	278077	275662	SPAC1687.05	SPCC126.02c	pli1	pku70	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Watts FZ (2007)	18031226	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Sumoylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264842	2542312	2539020	278778	275593	SPAC16A10.06c	SPCC5E4.06	nse2	smc6	pli2	rad18	Biochemical Activity	physical	Watts FZ (2007)	18031226	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Sumoylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264843	2542312	2542312	278778	278778	SPAC16A10.06c	SPAC16A10.06c	nse2	nse2	pli2	pli2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Watts FZ (2007)	18031226	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Sumoylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264844	2542312	2541620	278778	278117	SPAC16A10.06c	SPAC2G11.12	nse2	rqh1	pli2	hus2|rad12|rec9	Biochemical Activity	physical	Watts FZ (2007)	18031226	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Sumoylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264845	2543058	2543040	279492	279475	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC31G5.13	rpn15	rpn11	dss1|sem1	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Mannen T (2008)	18023413	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
264846	2538846	2538846	275427	275427	SPCC1919.10c	SPCC1919.10c	myo52	myo52	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Grallert A (2007)	18003699	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264847	2538846	2543039	275427	279474	SPCC1919.10c	SPAC3A12.14	myo52	cam1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Grallert A (2007)	18003699	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264848	2539805	2543539	276355	279956	SPBC146.09c	SPAC926.04c	lsd1	hsp90	saf110|swm1	git10|swo1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nicolas E (2006)	16990277	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264849	2539805	2539406	276355	275971	SPBC146.09c	SPCC4G3.07c	lsd1	phf1	saf110|swm1	saf50|swp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nicolas E (2006)	16990277	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264850	2539805	2541832	276355	278323	SPBC146.09c	SPAC23E2.02	lsd1	lsd2	saf110|swm1	saf140|swm2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nicolas E (2006)	16990277	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264851	2539805	2540551	276355	277078	SPBC146.09c	SPBC23E6.01c	lsd1	cxr1	saf110|swm1	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nicolas E (2006)	16990277	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264852	2541832	2542363	278323	278827	SPAC23E2.02	SPAC1783.05	lsd2	hrp1	saf140|swm2	chd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nicolas E (2006)	16990277	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264853	2541832	2539805	278323	276355	SPAC23E2.02	SPBC146.09c	lsd2	lsd1	saf140|swm2	saf110|swm1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nicolas E (2006)	16990277	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264854	2541832	2540551	278323	277078	SPAC23E2.02	SPBC23E6.01c	lsd2	cxr1	saf140|swm2	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nicolas E (2006)	16990277	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264855	2541832	2542236	278323	278708	SPAC23E2.02	SPAC30D11.08c	lsd2	phf2	saf140|swm2	saf60|swp2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nicolas E (2006)	16990277	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264856	2540414	2543079	276942	279512	SPBC24C6.06	SPAC343.04c	gpa1	SPAC343.04c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Goddard A (2006)	16884933	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264862	2786	2539974	109048	276518	-	SPBC32H8.07	GNG4	git5	-	gpb1	Two-hybrid	physical	Goddard A (2006)	16884933	9606	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264863	2540666	2782	277191	109044	SPBC215.04	RP1-283E3.7	git11	GNB1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Goddard A (2006)	16884933	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264864	2540666	2783	277191	109045	SPBC215.04	-	git11	GNB2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Goddard A (2006)	16884933	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264865	2540666	2784	277191	109046	SPBC215.04	-	git11	GNB3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Goddard A (2006)	16884933	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264866	2540666	59345	277191	121887	SPBC215.04	RP11-145M9.4	git11	GNB4	-	CMTD1F	Two-hybrid	physical	Goddard A (2006)	16884933	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264867	2540666	10681	277191	115920	SPBC215.04	-	git11	GNB5	-	GB5	Two-hybrid	physical	Goddard A (2006)	16884933	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264868	2540666	2539974	277191	276518	SPBC215.04	SPBC32H8.07	git11	git5	-	gpb1	Two-hybrid	physical	Goddard A (2006)	16884933	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
264995	2541635	2541580	278131	278077	SPAC1556.01c	SPAC1687.05	rad50	pli1	SPAP4C9.01c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Xhemalce B (2007)	17209013	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
264998	2539209	2541580	275779	278077	SPCC23B6.03c	SPAC1687.05	tel1	pli1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Xhemalce B (2007)	17209013	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
265001	3361330	2541587	280406	278084	SPBC20F10.04c	SPAC14C4.02c	nse4	smc5	rad62	spr18	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Palecek J (2006)	17005570	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
265002	3361330	2539020	280406	275593	SPBC20F10.04c	SPCC5E4.06	nse4	smc6	rad62	rad18	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Palecek J (2006)	17005570	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
265003	3361330	2541587	280406	278084	SPBC20F10.04c	SPAC14C4.02c	nse4	smc5	rad62	spr18	Two-hybrid	physical	Palecek J (2006)	17005570	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
265004	3361330	2539436	280406	275999	SPBC20F10.04c	SPCC645.04	nse4	nse3	rad62	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Palecek J (2006)	17005570	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
265005	2539436	2541587	275999	278084	SPCC645.04	SPAC14C4.02c	nse3	smc5	-	spr18	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Palecek J (2006)	17005570	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
265006	2539436	2539020	275999	275593	SPCC645.04	SPCC5E4.06	nse3	smc6	-	rad18	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Palecek J (2006)	17005570	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
265007	2540911	2541587	277427	278084	SPBC651.10	SPAC14C4.02c	nse5	smc5	-	spr18	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Palecek J (2006)	17005570	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
265008	2540911	2539020	277427	275593	SPBC651.10	SPCC5E4.06	nse5	smc6	-	rad18	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Palecek J (2006)	17005570	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
265009	2541512	2541587	278013	278084	SPAC11E3.08c	SPAC14C4.02c	nse6	smc5	-	spr18	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Palecek J (2006)	17005570	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
265010	2541512	2539020	278013	275593	SPAC11E3.08c	SPCC5E4.06	nse6	smc6	-	rad18	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Palecek J (2006)	17005570	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
265011	2539311	2543117	275878	279549	SPCP1E11.06	SPAC806.08c	apl4	mod21	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Anders A (2006)	17021256	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
265012	2539309	2543117	275876	279549	SPCC4G3.19	SPAC806.08c	alp16	mod21	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Anders A (2006)	17021256	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
265013	2539309	2540667	275876	277192	SPCC4G3.19	SPBC211.06	alp16	gfh1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Anders A (2006)	17021256	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
286780	2539568	2540219	276128	276752	SPCC663.05c	SPBC31F10.13c	cia1	hip1	asf1	hir1	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Malay AD (2008)	18334479	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
297373	2540761	2541925	277281	278413	SPBC21.04	SPAC5D6.05	med8	med18	sep15	sep11|pmc6	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Lariviere L (2008)	18381891	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
297374	2540761	2541925	277281	278413	SPBC21.04	SPAC5D6.05	med8	med18	sep15	sep11|pmc6	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Lariviere L (2008)	18381891	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298326	2540992	2542463	277508	278924	SPBC342.05	SPAC1834.03c	crb2	hhf1	rhp9	h4.1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Greeson NT (2008)	18826944	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298327	2543583	2540241	279998	276773	SPAC644.12	SPBC32H8.11	cdc5	mei4	-	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Moldon A (2008)	18815595	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298328	2538936	2540241	275512	276773	SPCC10H11.01	SPBC32H8.11	prp11	mei4	prp5	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Moldon A (2008)	18815595	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298329	2539481	2541633	276044	278129	SPCC622.16c	SPAC664.01c	epe1	swi6	kdm2	SPAC824.10c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sadaie M (2008)	18809570	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298330	2539481	2540047	276044	276585	SPCC622.16c	SPBC16C6.10	epe1	chp2	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sadaie M (2008)	18809570	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298331	2539481	2541633	276044	278129	SPCC622.16c	SPAC664.01c	epe1	swi6	kdm2	SPAC824.10c	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Sadaie M (2008)	18809570	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298332	2539481	2540047	276044	276585	SPCC622.16c	SPBC16C6.10	epe1	chp2	kdm2	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Sadaie M (2008)	18809570	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298333	2540047	2540821	276585	277339	SPBC16C6.10	SPBC800.03	chp2	clr3	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Sadaie M (2008)	18809570	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
298334	2540047	2540821	276585	277339	SPBC16C6.10	SPBC800.03	chp2	clr3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sadaie M (2008)	18809570	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	-	-	BIOGRID
298335	2542123	2539864	278599	276411	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC16A3.15c	mal3	nda2	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	des Georges A (2008)	18794845	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298336	2542207	2543116	278682	279548	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC3A11.08	ddb1	pcu4	-	Cul-4|cul4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Fukumoto Y (2008)	18794354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298337	2542207	2539225	278682	275795	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC1739.13	ddb1	ssa2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Fukumoto Y (2008)	18794354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298338	2542207	2543525	278682	279943	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC4A8.14	ddb1	SPAC4A8.14	-	prs1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Fukumoto Y (2008)	18794354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298339	2542207	2539490	278682	276053	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC364.07	ddb1	ser3	-	SPCC364.07|SPCC4G3.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Fukumoto Y (2008)	18794354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298340	2542207	2542651	278682	279105	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC24C9.12c	ddb1	SPAC24C9.12c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Fukumoto Y (2008)	18794354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298341	2542207	2541117	278682	277632	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC646.13	ddb1	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Fukumoto Y (2008)	18794354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298342	2542207	2539093	278682	275665	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC736.15	ddb1	pil1	-	SPCC736.15	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Fukumoto Y (2008)	18794354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298343	2542207	2542374	278682	278838	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC17H9.19c	ddb1	cdt2	-	sev1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Fukumoto Y (2008)	18794354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298344	2542207	2541121	278682	277636	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC609.03	ddb1	iqw1	-	iqwd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Fukumoto Y (2008)	18794354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298345	2542207	2540861	278682	277378	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC577.09	ddb1	ckn1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Fukumoto Y (2008)	18794354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298346	2542207	2541535	278682	278035	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC12G12.10	ddb1	wdr21	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Fukumoto Y (2008)	18794354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298347	2542207	2541535	278682	278035	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC12G12.10	ddb1	wdr21	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Fukumoto Y (2008)	18794354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298348	2542207	2540861	278682	277378	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC577.09	ddb1	ckn1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Fukumoto Y (2008)	18794354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298349	2540345	2540861	276874	277378	SPBC19C7.09c	SPBC577.09	uve1	ckn1	uvde	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Fukumoto Y (2008)	18794354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	-	-	BIOGRID
298350	2540345	2541535	276874	278035	SPBC19C7.09c	SPAC12G12.10	uve1	wdr21	uvde	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Fukumoto Y (2008)	18794354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	-	-	BIOGRID
298351	2542682	2542773	279135	279222	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC16.01	rga2	rho2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Villar-Tajadura MA (2008)	18793338	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298352	2542682	2543027	279135	279463	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC110.03	rga2	cdc42	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Villar-Tajadura MA (2008)	18793338	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298353	2542682	2542773	279135	279222	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC16.01	rga2	rho2	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Villar-Tajadura MA (2008)	18793338	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	No Modification	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298356	2542773	2539649	279222	276204	SPAC16.01	SPBC12D12.04c	rho2	pck2	-	pkc1|sts6	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Villar-Tajadura MA (2008)	18793338	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298359	2540458	2538852	276986	275433	SPBC29A10.14	SPCC4E9.01c	rec8	rec11	-	SPCC550.16c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Doll E (2008)	18780734	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis	-	-	BIOGRID
298360	2541635	2540584	278131	277110	SPAC1556.01c	SPBC28F2.07	rad50	sfr1	SPAP4C9.01c	dds20|mug13	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Khasanov FK (2008)	18769921	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	double mutants show increased sensitivity to MMS (CID 4156 CHEBI 25255)	-	BIOGRID
298362	2540584	2543577	277110	279992	SPBC28F2.07	SPAC4H3.05	sfr1	srs2	dds20|mug13	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Khasanov FK (2008)	18769921	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals	double mutants show increased sensitivity to MMS (CID 4156 CHEBI 25255) and UV radiation	-	BIOGRID
298365	2540584	2543685	277110	280099	SPBC28F2.07	SPAC3C7.03c	sfr1	rad55	dds20|mug13	rhp55	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Khasanov FK (2008)	18769921	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	double mutants show increased sensitivity to UV	-	BIOGRID
298366	2540584	2538959	277110	275533	SPBC28F2.07	SPCC18B5.11c	sfr1	cds1	dds20|mug13	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Khasanov FK (2008)	18769921	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	double mutants show increased sensitivity to UV	-	BIOGRID
298367	2542071	2541633	278548	278129	SPAC26H5.03	SPAC664.01c	pcf2	swi6	cac2	SPAC824.10c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dohke K (2008)	18761674	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298368	2542071	2541656	278548	278152	SPAC26H5.03	SPAC25H1.06	pcf2	pcf3	cac2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dohke K (2008)	18761674	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298369	2542071	2540020	278548	276564	SPAC26H5.03	SPBC16D10.09	pcf2	pcn1	cac2	pcn	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dohke K (2008)	18761674	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298370	2541695	2539164	278191	275735	SPAC1F7.05	SPCC16A11.17	cdc22	mcm4	-	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nitani N (2008)	18753627	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298371	2539164	2540719	275735	277242	SPCC16A11.17	SPBC216.05	mcm4	rad3	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nitani N (2008)	18753627	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
298372	2539164	2539087	275735	275659	SPCC16A11.17	SPCC1259.13	mcm4	chk1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	rad27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nitani N (2008)	18753627	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
298373	2539164	2538959	275735	275533	SPCC16A11.17	SPCC18B5.11c	mcm4	cds1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nitani N (2008)	18753627	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
298374	2541545	2541545	278045	278045	SPAC22F8.07c	SPAC22F8.07c	rtf1	rtf1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Eydmann T (2008)	18723894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298375	2541107	2540470	277622	276998	SPBC646.14c	SPBC29A10.15	orc5	orc1	-	cdc30|orp1|rid1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Houchens CR (2008)	18723846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298376	2541107	2541159	277622	277674	SPBC646.14c	SPBC685.09	orc5	orc2	-	orp2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Houchens CR (2008)	18723846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298377	2541107	2543248	277622	279676	SPBC646.14c	SPAC3H1.01c	orc5	orc3	-	SPAP14E8.06c|orp3	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Houchens CR (2008)	18723846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298378	2541107	2541298	277622	277810	SPBC646.14c	SPBP23A10.13	orc5	orc4	-	orp4	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Houchens CR (2008)	18723846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298379	2541107	2540438	277622	276966	SPBC646.14c	SPBC2A9.12	orc5	orc6	-	SPBC2D10.02	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Houchens CR (2008)	18723846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298380	2540012	2541754	276556	278248	SPBC1709.10c	SPAC2E1P3.04	atx1	cao1	-	spao1	Two-hybrid	physical	Peter C (2008)	18723604	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298381	2542703	2539042	279156	275615	SPAC26H5.06	SPCC1183.05c	pot1	lig4	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Wang X (2008)	18722173	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
298382	2542703	2543086	279156	279519	SPAC26H5.06	SPAC30D11.10	pot1	rad52	-	rad22|rad22A	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Wang X (2008)	18722173	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
298383	2542703	2543577	279156	279992	SPAC26H5.06	SPAC4H3.05	pot1	srs2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Wang X (2008)	18722173	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
298384	2542703	2541620	279156	278117	SPAC26H5.06	SPAC2G11.12	pot1	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Wang X (2008)	18722173	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
298385	2542703	2538860	279156	275440	SPAC26H5.06	SPCC330.01c	pot1	rhp16	-	SPCC613.13c|rad16	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Wang X (2008)	18722173	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
298386	2540601	2538860	277127	275440	SPBC29A3.14c	SPCC330.01c	trt1	rhp16	-	SPCC613.13c|rad16	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Wang X (2008)	18722173	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
298387	2541633	2541326	278129	277838	SPAC664.01c	SPBP35G2.03c	swi6	sgo1	SPAC824.10c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Yamagishi Y (2008)	18716626	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298388	2539737	2540234	276289	276766	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC336.12c	nrm1	cdc10	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	de Bruin RA (2008)	18682565	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298389	2541871	2540234	278361	276766	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC336.12c	res2	cdc10	mcs1|pct1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	de Bruin RA (2008)	18682565	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298390	2541871	2539737	278361	276289	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC16A3.07c	res2	nrm1	mcs1|pct1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	de Bruin RA (2008)	18682565	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298391	2538959	2539737	275533	276289	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC16A3.07c	cds1	nrm1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	de Bruin RA (2008)	18682565	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
298392	2540719	2539737	277242	276289	SPBC216.05	SPBC16A3.07c	rad3	nrm1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	de Bruin RA (2008)	18682565	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
298393	2538959	2539737	275533	276289	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC16A3.07c	cds1	nrm1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	de Bruin RA (2008)	18682565	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298394	2540992	2540992	277508	277508	SPBC342.05	SPBC342.05	crb2	crb2	rhp9	rhp9	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kilkenny ML (2008)	18676809	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298395	2539087	2540627	275659	277153	SPCC1259.13	SPBC25H2.13c	chk1	cdc20	rad27	pol2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298396	2539087	2540470	275659	276998	SPCC1259.13	SPBC29A10.15	chk1	orc1	rad27	cdc30|orp1|rid1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298397	2539087	2541159	275659	277674	SPCC1259.13	SPBC685.09	chk1	orc2	rad27	orp2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298398	2539087	2540013	275659	276557	SPCC1259.13	SPBC14C8.07c	chk1	cdc18	rad27	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298399	2539087	2539164	275659	275735	SPCC1259.13	SPCC16A11.17	chk1	mcm4	rad27	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298400	2539087	2540255	275659	276786	SPCC1259.13	SPBC336.04	chk1	cdc6	rad27	mis10|pol3|pold	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298401	2539087	2543407	275659	279829	SPCC1259.13	SPAC8F11.07c	chk1	cdc24	rad27	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298402	2539087	2539627	275659	276184	SPCC1259.13	SPBC1734.02c	chk1	cdc27	rad27	SPBC337.18c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298403	2538959	2540255	275533	276786	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC336.04	cds1	cdc6	-	mis10|pol3|pold	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298404	2538959	2543407	275533	279829	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC8F11.07c	cds1	cdc24	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298405	2538959	2539627	275533	276184	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC1734.02c	cds1	cdc27	-	SPBC337.18c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298428	2543240	2539164	279668	275735	SPAC694.06c	SPCC16A11.17	mrc1	mcm4	-	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298429	2543240	2541159	279668	277674	SPAC694.06c	SPBC685.09	mrc1	orc2	-	orp2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298432	2540627	2540728	277153	277251	SPBC25H2.13c	SPBC216.06c	cdc20	swi1	pol2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298433	2540627	3361323	277153	280399	SPBC25H2.13c	SPBC30D10.04	cdc20	swi3	pol2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298434	2541159	2540728	277674	277251	SPBC685.09	SPBC216.06c	orc2	swi1	orp2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298435	2541159	3361323	277674	280399	SPBC685.09	SPBC30D10.04	orc2	swi3	orp2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298436	2540470	2540728	276998	277251	SPBC29A10.15	SPBC216.06c	orc1	swi1	cdc30|orp1|rid1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298437	2540470	3361323	276998	280399	SPBC29A10.15	SPBC30D10.04	orc1	swi3	cdc30|orp1|rid1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298438	2540627	2538959	277153	275533	SPBC25H2.13c	SPCC18B5.11c	cdc20	cds1	pol2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298439	2540627	2539087	277153	275659	SPBC25H2.13c	SPCC1259.13	cdc20	chk1	pol2	rad27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298440	2540627	2542558	277153	279014	SPBC25H2.13c	SPAC1952.07	cdc20	rad1	pol2	rad19	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298441	2540627	2543544	277153	279961	SPBC25H2.13c	SPAC664.07c	cdc20	rad9	pol2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298442	2540627	2540719	277153	277242	SPBC25H2.13c	SPBC216.05	cdc20	rad3	pol2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298443	2540627	2543289	277153	279714	SPBC25H2.13c	SPAC9E9.08	cdc20	rad26	pol2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298444	2540627	2541643	277153	278139	SPBC25H2.13c	SPAC14C4.13	cdc20	rad17	pol2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298445	2540627	2543240	277153	279668	SPBC25H2.13c	SPAC694.06c	cdc20	mrc1	pol2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298446	2540627	2540992	277153	277508	SPBC25H2.13c	SPBC342.05	cdc20	crb2	pol2	rhp9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298447	2540627	2539004	277153	275578	SPBC25H2.13c	SPCC4G3.05c	cdc20	mus81	pol2	slx3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298448	2540627	2541620	277153	278117	SPBC25H2.13c	SPAC2G11.12	cdc20	rqh1	pol2	hus2|rad12|rec9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298449	2540627	2542029	277153	278511	SPBC25H2.13c	SPAC8E11.02c	cdc20	rad24	pol2	anr5|sam4	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298450	2540470	2538959	276998	275533	SPBC29A10.15	SPCC18B5.11c	orc1	cds1	cdc30|orp1|rid1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298451	2540470	2539087	276998	275659	SPBC29A10.15	SPCC1259.13	orc1	chk1	cdc30|orp1|rid1	rad27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298452	2540470	2542558	276998	279014	SPBC29A10.15	SPAC1952.07	orc1	rad1	cdc30|orp1|rid1	rad19	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298453	2540470	2543544	276998	279961	SPBC29A10.15	SPAC664.07c	orc1	rad9	cdc30|orp1|rid1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298454	2540470	2540719	276998	277242	SPBC29A10.15	SPBC216.05	orc1	rad3	cdc30|orp1|rid1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298455	2540470	2543289	276998	279714	SPBC29A10.15	SPAC9E9.08	orc1	rad26	cdc30|orp1|rid1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298456	2540470	2541643	276998	278139	SPBC29A10.15	SPAC14C4.13	orc1	rad17	cdc30|orp1|rid1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298457	2540470	2543240	276998	279668	SPBC29A10.15	SPAC694.06c	orc1	mrc1	cdc30|orp1|rid1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298458	2540470	2540992	276998	277508	SPBC29A10.15	SPBC342.05	orc1	crb2	cdc30|orp1|rid1	rhp9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298459	2540470	2539004	276998	275578	SPBC29A10.15	SPCC4G3.05c	orc1	mus81	cdc30|orp1|rid1	slx3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298460	2540470	2541620	276998	278117	SPBC29A10.15	SPAC2G11.12	orc1	rqh1	cdc30|orp1|rid1	hus2|rad12|rec9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298461	2540470	2542029	276998	278511	SPBC29A10.15	SPAC8E11.02c	orc1	rad24	cdc30|orp1|rid1	anr5|sam4	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yin L (2008)	18667534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
298462	2538959	2540234	275533	276766	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC336.12c	cds1	cdc10	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Dutta C (2008)	18662996	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
298463	2540719	2540234	277242	276766	SPBC216.05	SPBC336.12c	rad3	cdc10	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Dutta C (2008)	18662996	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
298464	2543233	5802965	279661	858103	SPAC630.03	SPAC11H11.06	arp3	arp2	act2	SPAC22F8.01	Co-purification	physical	Nolen BJ (2008)	18640983	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298466	2539655	2539302	276210	275870	SPBC16D10.06	SPCC126.09	zrt1	zip2	-	SPCC126.09	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Boch A (2008)	18637840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chemical compound accumulation	double mutants show a decrease in zinc levels	-	BIOGRID
298617	2538736	2542418	275320	278881	SPCC1322.12c	SPAC1805.07c	bub1	dad2	-	hos2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Saitoh S (2008)	18632983	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution|spindle morphology	double mutants show enhanced defects in mad2 accumulation at unattached kinetochores	-	BIOGRID
298618	2541801	2538881	278292	275460	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC1620.14c	snf5	snf22	-	SPCC830.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298619	2541801	2540318	278292	276848	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC30B4.04c	snf5	sol1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298620	2541801	2542400	278292	278864	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC17G6.10	snf5	ssr1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298621	2541801	2541540	278292	278040	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC1071.06	snf5	arp9	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298622	2541801	2540474	278292	277002	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC26H8.09c	snf5	snf59	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298623	2541801	2541851	278292	278342	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC23H3.10	snf5	ssr2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298624	2541801	2541438	278292	277943	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC23G3.10c	snf5	ssr3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298625	2541801	2541301	278292	277813	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBP23A10.05	snf5	ssr4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298626	2541801	2541496	278292	277998	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC23D3.09	snf5	arp42	-	arp4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298627	2541801	2541781	278292	278274	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC23G3.07c	snf5	snf30	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298628	2541801	2541729	278292	278223	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC22H12.02	snf5	tfg3	-	taf14	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298629	2542638	2540749	279092	277271	SPAC1250.01	SPBC4B4.03	snf21	rsc1	SPAC29A4.21|brg1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298630	2542638	2539948	279092	276492	SPAC1250.01	SPBC1703.02	snf21	rsc9	SPAC29A4.21|brg1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298631	2542638	2539999	279092	276543	SPAC1250.01	SPBC1734.15	snf21	rsc4	SPAC29A4.21|brg1	brd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298632	2542638	2542400	279092	278864	SPAC1250.01	SPAC17G6.10	snf21	ssr1	SPAC29A4.21|brg1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298633	2542638	2541540	279092	278040	SPAC1250.01	SPAC1071.06	snf21	arp9	SPAC29A4.21|brg1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298634	2542638	2541851	279092	278342	SPAC1250.01	SPAC23H3.10	snf21	ssr2	SPAC29A4.21|brg1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298635	2542638	2541438	279092	277943	SPAC1250.01	SPAC23G3.10c	snf21	ssr3	SPAC29A4.21|brg1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298636	2542638	2539144	279092	275716	SPAC1250.01	SPCC16A11.14	snf21	sfh1	SPAC29A4.21|brg1	SPNCRNA.125	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298637	2542638	2541419	279092	277925	SPAC1250.01	SPAC1F3.07c	snf21	rsc58	SPAC29A4.21|brg1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298638	2542638	2541301	279092	277813	SPAC1250.01	SPBP23A10.05	snf21	ssr4	SPAC29A4.21|brg1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298639	2542638	2541496	279092	277998	SPAC1250.01	SPAC23D3.09	snf21	arp42	SPAC29A4.21|brg1	arp4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298640	2542638	2538836	279092	275417	SPAC1250.01	SPCC1281.05	snf21	rsc7	SPAC29A4.21|brg1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298641	2538881	2538881	275460	275460	SPCC1620.14c	SPCC1620.14c	snf22	snf22	SPCC830.01c	SPCC830.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298642	2538881	2540318	275460	276848	SPCC1620.14c	SPBC30B4.04c	snf22	sol1	SPCC830.01c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298643	2538881	2541801	275460	278292	SPCC1620.14c	SPAC2F7.08c	snf22	snf5	SPCC830.01c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298644	2538881	2542400	275460	278864	SPCC1620.14c	SPAC17G6.10	snf22	ssr1	SPCC830.01c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298645	2538881	2541540	275460	278040	SPCC1620.14c	SPAC1071.06	snf22	arp9	SPCC830.01c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298646	2538881	2540474	275460	277002	SPCC1620.14c	SPBC26H8.09c	snf22	snf59	SPCC830.01c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298647	2538881	2541851	275460	278342	SPCC1620.14c	SPAC23H3.10	snf22	ssr2	SPCC830.01c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298648	2538881	2541496	275460	277998	SPCC1620.14c	SPAC23D3.09	snf22	arp42	SPCC830.01c	arp4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298649	2538881	2541438	275460	277943	SPCC1620.14c	SPAC23G3.10c	snf22	ssr3	SPCC830.01c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298650	2538881	2541301	275460	277813	SPCC1620.14c	SPBP23A10.05	snf22	ssr4	SPCC830.01c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298651	2538881	2541781	275460	278274	SPCC1620.14c	SPAC23G3.07c	snf22	snf30	SPCC830.01c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298652	2538881	2541729	275460	278223	SPCC1620.14c	SPAC22H12.02	snf22	tfg3	SPCC830.01c	taf14	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298653	2540474	2538881	277002	275460	SPBC26H8.09c	SPCC1620.14c	snf59	snf22	-	SPCC830.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298654	2540474	2540318	277002	276848	SPBC26H8.09c	SPBC30B4.04c	snf59	sol1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298655	2540474	2541801	277002	278292	SPBC26H8.09c	SPAC2F7.08c	snf59	snf5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298656	2540474	2542400	277002	278864	SPBC26H8.09c	SPAC17G6.10	snf59	ssr1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298657	2540474	2541540	277002	278040	SPBC26H8.09c	SPAC1071.06	snf59	arp9	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298658	2540474	2540474	277002	277002	SPBC26H8.09c	SPBC26H8.09c	snf59	snf59	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298659	2540474	2541851	277002	278342	SPBC26H8.09c	SPAC23H3.10	snf59	ssr2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298660	2540474	2541496	277002	277998	SPBC26H8.09c	SPAC23D3.09	snf59	arp42	-	arp4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298661	2540474	2541438	277002	277943	SPBC26H8.09c	SPAC23G3.10c	snf59	ssr3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298662	2540474	2541301	277002	277813	SPBC26H8.09c	SPBP23A10.05	snf59	ssr4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298663	2540474	2541781	277002	278274	SPBC26H8.09c	SPAC23G3.07c	snf59	snf30	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298664	2540474	2541729	277002	278223	SPBC26H8.09c	SPAC22H12.02	snf59	tfg3	-	taf14	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298665	2541781	2538881	278274	275460	SPAC23G3.07c	SPCC1620.14c	snf30	snf22	-	SPCC830.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298666	2541781	2540318	278274	276848	SPAC23G3.07c	SPBC30B4.04c	snf30	sol1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298667	2541781	2541801	278274	278292	SPAC23G3.07c	SPAC2F7.08c	snf30	snf5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298668	2541781	2542400	278274	278864	SPAC23G3.07c	SPAC17G6.10	snf30	ssr1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298669	2541781	2541540	278274	278040	SPAC23G3.07c	SPAC1071.06	snf30	arp9	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298670	2541781	2540474	278274	277002	SPAC23G3.07c	SPBC26H8.09c	snf30	snf59	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298671	2541781	2541851	278274	278342	SPAC23G3.07c	SPAC23H3.10	snf30	ssr2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298672	2541781	2541496	278274	277998	SPAC23G3.07c	SPAC23D3.09	snf30	arp42	-	arp4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298673	2541781	2541438	278274	277943	SPAC23G3.07c	SPAC23G3.10c	snf30	ssr3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298674	2541781	2541301	278274	277813	SPAC23G3.07c	SPBP23A10.05	snf30	ssr4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298675	2541781	2541781	278274	278274	SPAC23G3.07c	SPAC23G3.07c	snf30	snf30	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298676	2541781	2541729	278274	278223	SPAC23G3.07c	SPAC22H12.02	snf30	tfg3	-	taf14	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298677	2539144	2542638	275716	279092	SPCC16A11.14	SPAC1250.01	sfh1	snf21	SPNCRNA.125	SPAC29A4.21|brg1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298678	2539144	2540749	275716	277271	SPCC16A11.14	SPBC4B4.03	sfh1	rsc1	SPNCRNA.125	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298679	2539144	2539948	275716	276492	SPCC16A11.14	SPBC1703.02	sfh1	rsc9	SPNCRNA.125	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298680	2539144	2539999	275716	276543	SPCC16A11.14	SPBC1734.15	sfh1	rsc4	SPNCRNA.125	brd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298681	2539144	2542400	275716	278864	SPCC16A11.14	SPAC17G6.10	sfh1	ssr1	SPNCRNA.125	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298682	2539144	2541540	275716	278040	SPCC16A11.14	SPAC1071.06	sfh1	arp9	SPNCRNA.125	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298683	2539144	2541851	275716	278342	SPCC16A11.14	SPAC23H3.10	sfh1	ssr2	SPNCRNA.125	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298684	2539144	2541496	275716	277998	SPCC16A11.14	SPAC23D3.09	sfh1	arp42	SPNCRNA.125	arp4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298685	2539144	2541438	275716	277943	SPCC16A11.14	SPAC23G3.10c	sfh1	ssr3	SPNCRNA.125	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298686	2539144	2539144	275716	275716	SPCC16A11.14	SPCC16A11.14	sfh1	sfh1	SPNCRNA.125	SPNCRNA.125	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298687	2539144	2541419	275716	277925	SPCC16A11.14	SPAC1F3.07c	sfh1	rsc58	SPNCRNA.125	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298688	2539144	2541301	275716	277813	SPCC16A11.14	SPBP23A10.05	sfh1	ssr4	SPNCRNA.125	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298689	2538836	2542638	275417	279092	SPCC1281.05	SPAC1250.01	rsc7	snf21	-	SPAC29A4.21|brg1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298690	2538836	2540749	275417	277271	SPCC1281.05	SPBC4B4.03	rsc7	rsc1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298691	2538836	2539948	275417	276492	SPCC1281.05	SPBC1703.02	rsc7	rsc9	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298692	2538836	2539999	275417	276543	SPCC1281.05	SPBC1734.15	rsc7	rsc4	-	brd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298693	2538836	2542400	275417	278864	SPCC1281.05	SPAC17G6.10	rsc7	ssr1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298694	2538836	2541540	275417	278040	SPCC1281.05	SPAC1071.06	rsc7	arp9	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298695	2538836	2541851	275417	278342	SPCC1281.05	SPAC23H3.10	rsc7	ssr2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298696	2538836	2541496	275417	277998	SPCC1281.05	SPAC23D3.09	rsc7	arp42	-	arp4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298697	2538836	2541438	275417	277943	SPCC1281.05	SPAC23G3.10c	rsc7	ssr3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298698	2538836	2539144	275417	275716	SPCC1281.05	SPCC16A11.14	rsc7	sfh1	-	SPNCRNA.125	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298699	2538836	2541419	275417	277925	SPCC1281.05	SPAC1F3.07c	rsc7	rsc58	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298700	2538836	2541301	275417	277813	SPCC1281.05	SPBP23A10.05	rsc7	ssr4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298701	2540749	2542638	277271	279092	SPBC4B4.03	SPAC1250.01	rsc1	snf21	-	SPAC29A4.21|brg1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298702	2540749	2540749	277271	277271	SPBC4B4.03	SPBC4B4.03	rsc1	rsc1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298703	2540749	2539948	277271	276492	SPBC4B4.03	SPBC1703.02	rsc1	rsc9	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298704	2540749	2539999	277271	276543	SPBC4B4.03	SPBC1734.15	rsc1	rsc4	-	brd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298705	2540749	2542400	277271	278864	SPBC4B4.03	SPAC17G6.10	rsc1	ssr1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298706	2540749	2541540	277271	278040	SPBC4B4.03	SPAC1071.06	rsc1	arp9	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298707	2540749	2541851	277271	278342	SPBC4B4.03	SPAC23H3.10	rsc1	ssr2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298708	2540749	2541496	277271	277998	SPBC4B4.03	SPAC23D3.09	rsc1	arp42	-	arp4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298709	2540749	2541438	277271	277943	SPBC4B4.03	SPAC23G3.10c	rsc1	ssr3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298710	2540749	2539144	277271	275716	SPBC4B4.03	SPCC16A11.14	rsc1	sfh1	-	SPNCRNA.125	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298711	2540749	2541419	277271	277925	SPBC4B4.03	SPAC1F3.07c	rsc1	rsc58	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298712	2540749	2541301	277271	277813	SPBC4B4.03	SPBP23A10.05	rsc1	ssr4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Monahan BJ (2008)	18622392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298713	2541355	2542467	277866	278928	SPBP8B7.19	SPAC1834.04	spt16	hht1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Stuwe T (2008)	18579787	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298714	2541355	2542463	277866	278924	SPBP8B7.19	SPAC1834.03c	spt16	hhf1	-	h4.1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Stuwe T (2008)	18579787	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298715	2541599	2539377	278096	275943	SPAC24B11.11c	SPCC825.03c	sid2	psy1	-	sso1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yan H (2008)	18562696	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation efficiency:wild type|sporulation:wild type	increased expression of psy1 suppresses the sporulation defect of sid2-250 slk1{Delta}	-	BIOGRID
298716	2542615	2540589	279069	277115	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBC20F10.06	cut20	mad2	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298717	2542615	2539219	279069	275789	SPAC19G12.01c	SPCC1795.01c	cut20	mad3	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	SPCC895.02	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298720	852288	2541402	32704	277911	YBR003W	SPBPJ4664.01	COQ1	dps1	trans-hexaprenyltranstransferase|L000000378	SPBPJ694.01|dps	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Zhang M (2008)	18540885	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298721	2542703	2539352	279156	275918	SPAC26H5.06	SPCC188.07	pot1	ccq1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Miyoshi T (2008)	18535244	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298722	2542703	2539352	279156	275918	SPAC26H5.06	SPCC188.07	pot1	ccq1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miyoshi T (2008)	18535244	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298853	2543506	2542756	279924	279206	SPAC637.12c	SPAC15A10.16	mst1	bud6	kat5	SPAC15E1.01|aip3|fat1	Two-hybrid	physical	Gomez EB (2008)	18505873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298854	2543506	2543290	279924	279715	SPAC637.12c	SPAC9E9.10c	mst1	cbh1	kat5	cbh	Two-hybrid	physical	Gomez EB (2008)	18505873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298855	2543506	2540219	279924	276752	SPAC637.12c	SPBC31F10.13c	mst1	hip1	kat5	hir1	Two-hybrid	physical	Gomez EB (2008)	18505873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298856	2543506	2541710	279924	278205	SPAC637.12c	SPAC343.11c	mst1	msc1	kat5	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Gomez EB (2008)	18505873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298857	2543506	2543086	279924	279519	SPAC637.12c	SPAC30D11.10	mst1	rad52	kat5	rad22|rad22A	Two-hybrid	physical	Gomez EB (2008)	18505873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298858	2543506	2541871	279924	278361	SPAC637.12c	SPAC22F3.09c	mst1	res2	kat5	mcs1|pct1	Two-hybrid	physical	Gomez EB (2008)	18505873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298859	2543506	2542410	279924	278874	SPAC637.12c	SPAC1834.11c	mst1	sec18	kat5	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Gomez EB (2008)	18505873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298860	2543506	2540099	279924	276637	SPAC637.12c	SPBC16H5.11c	mst1	skb1	kat5	rmt5	Two-hybrid	physical	Gomez EB (2008)	18505873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298861	2543506	2541848	279924	278339	SPAC637.12c	SPAC2G11.14	mst1	taf111	kat5	kat4|taf1|taf130	Two-hybrid	physical	Gomez EB (2008)	18505873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298862	2543506	2543086	279924	279519	SPAC637.12c	SPAC30D11.10	mst1	rad52	kat5	rad22|rad22A	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gomez EB (2008)	18505873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298863	2543086	2543506	279519	279924	SPAC30D11.10	SPAC637.12c	rad52	mst1	rad22|rad22A	kat5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gomez EB (2008)	18505873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298864	2539705	2542464	276258	278925	SPBC1105.10	SPAC1A6.09c	rav1	lag1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Dawson K (2008)	18441123	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
298865	2539705	2540466	276258	276994	SPBC1105.10	SPBC3E7.15c	rav1	lac1	-	SPBC4F6.02c|mug83	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Dawson K (2008)	18441123	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
298866	2539705	2540917	276258	277433	SPBC1105.10	SPBC409.05	rav1	skp1	-	psh1|sph1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dawson K (2008)	18441123	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298939	2540149	2541531	276686	278031	SPBC1289.03c	SPAC25A8.01c	spi1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ohba T (2008)	18422602	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298941	2542432	2542358	278894	278823	SPAC1805.15c	SPAC1782.09c	pub2	clp1	-	flp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Esteban V (2008)	18418059	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298942	2542432	2542358	278894	278823	SPAC1805.15c	SPAC1782.09c	pub2	clp1	-	flp1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Esteban V (2008)	18418059	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298943	2542732	2542655	279182	279109	SPAC25G10.07c	SPAC3A11.14c	cut7	pkl1	-	SPAC3H5.03c|klp1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Rodriguez AS (2008)	18418055	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
298944	2542732	2540223	279182	276756	SPAC25G10.07c	SPBC32F12.04	cut7	gtb1	-	tug1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Rodriguez AS (2008)	18418055	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
298945	2542732	2540392	279182	276920	SPAC25G10.07c	SPBC365.15	cut7	alp4	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Rodriguez AS (2008)	18418055	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
298946	2542732	2540690	279182	277215	SPAC25G10.07c	SPBC428.20c	cut7	alp6	-	SPBC902.01c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Rodriguez AS (2008)	18418055	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
298947	2539781	2540136	276331	276673	SPBC106.10	SPBC1347.11	pka1	sro1	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Sundaram G (2008)	18410345	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298948	2540547	2542873	277074	279318	SPBC32F12.11	SPAC9G1.02	tdh1	wis4	gpd1	wak1|wik1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Morigasaki S (2008)	18406331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298950	2540314	2541984	276844	278469	SPBC2G5.03	SPAC23A1.10	ctu1	tef102	-	ef1a-b|ef1a-d|efa1|SPBC24E9.15c|tef1-b|tef1-d	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Dewez M (2008)	18391219	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298951	2540314	2540896	276844	277412	SPBC2G5.03	SPBC19C2.13c	ctu1	ctu2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Dewez M (2008)	18391219	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
298952	2540314	2540896	276844	277412	SPBC2G5.03	SPBC19C2.13c	ctu1	ctu2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Dewez M (2008)	18391219	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology|heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
299084	2542029	2542358	278511	278823	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC1782.09c	rad24	clp1	anr5|sam4	flp1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Diaz-Cuervo H (2008)	18385517	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
299085	2542358	2538959	278823	275533	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC18B5.11c	clp1	cds1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Diaz-Cuervo H (2008)	18385517	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
299090	2540329	2542047	276859	278528	SPBC29B5.01	SPAC21E11.03c	atf1	pcr1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	mts2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sanso M (2008)	18375616	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
299091	2540329	2542047	276859	278528	SPBC29B5.01	SPAC21E11.03c	atf1	pcr1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	mts2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sanso M (2008)	18375616	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
299092	2539971	3361456	276515	280532	SPBC1105.04c	SPAC1142.03c	cbp1	swi2	abp1	SPAC17G6.20c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Aguilar-Arnal L (2008)	18354497	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating type switching	-	-	BIOGRID
299093	2539971	2540574	276515	277101	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC409.03	cbp1	swi5	abp1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Aguilar-Arnal L (2008)	18354497	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating type switching	-	-	BIOGRID
299100	2539050	2542239	275623	278711	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC18G6.02c	rik1	chp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhang K (2008)	18345014	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
299101	2540825	2542239	277343	278711	SPBC428.08c	SPAC18G6.02c	clr4	chp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhang K (2008)	18345014	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
299102	2540825	2542467	277343	278928	SPBC428.08c	SPAC1834.04	clr4	hht1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Zhang K (2008)	18345014	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
299103	2542366	2540719	278830	277242	SPAC1783.04c	SPBC216.05	hst4	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Haldar D (2008)	18344406	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
299104	2542366	2540992	278830	277508	SPAC1783.04c	SPBC342.05	hst4	crb2	-	rhp9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Haldar D (2008)	18344406	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
299105	2542366	2543240	278830	279668	SPAC1783.04c	SPAC694.06c	hst4	mrc1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Haldar D (2008)	18344406	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
299106	2542366	2538959	278830	275533	SPAC1783.04c	SPCC18B5.11c	hst4	cds1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Haldar D (2008)	18344406	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
299107	2542366	2539087	278830	275659	SPAC1783.04c	SPCC1259.13	hst4	chk1	-	rad27	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Haldar D (2008)	18344406	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
299113	2542438	2540627	278900	277153	SPAC17C9.01c	SPBC25H2.13c	nuc2	cdc20	SPAC1851.01|apc3	pol2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimata Y (2008)	18331722	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
299114	2541889	2540593	278379	277119	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC28E12.03	pom1	rga4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tatebe H (2008)	18328707	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
299115	2541022	2541889	277537	278379	SPBC3F6.05	SPAC2F7.03c	rga1	pom1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tatebe H (2008)	18328707	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
299117	2540593	2543027	277119	279463	SPBC28E12.03	SPAC110.03	rga4	cdc42	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tatebe H (2008)	18328707	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
299118	2543027	2540593	279463	277119	SPAC110.03	SPBC28E12.03	cdc42	rga4	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Tatebe H (2008)	18328707	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
299119	2540593	2543027	277119	279463	SPBC28E12.03	SPAC110.03	rga4	cdc42	-	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Tatebe H (2008)	18328707	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
299120	2543577	2540719	279992	277242	SPAC4H3.05	SPBC216.05	srs2	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Roguev A (2007)	17893680	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299121	2543577	2541620	279992	278117	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC2G11.12	srs2	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Roguev A (2007)	17893680	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299191	3361323	2541643	280399	278139	SPBC30D10.04	SPAC14C4.13	swi3	rad17	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-366.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299192	3361323	2542207	280399	278682	SPBC30D10.04	SPAC17H9.10c	swi3	ddb1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-120.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299193	3361323	2543240	280399	279668	SPBC30D10.04	SPAC694.06c	swi3	mrc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-375.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299194	3361323	2540244	280399	276776	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC336.01	swi3	fbh1	-	fdh|fdh1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299195	2539527	2540719	276089	277242	SPCC338.16	SPBC216.05	pof3	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-377.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299196	2539527	2543289	276089	279714	SPCC338.16	SPAC9E9.08	pof3	rad26	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-390.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299197	2539487	2538762	276050	275345	SPCC895.05	SPCC306.04c	for3	set1	-	kmt2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-136.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299198	2539527	2538762	276089	275345	SPCC338.16	SPCC306.04c	pof3	set1	-	kmt2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-139.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299199	2539366	2538769	275932	275352	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC126.04c	pef1	sgf73	p31	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-153.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299200	2539487	2538868	276050	275448	SPCC895.05	SPCC132.02	for3	hst2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-283.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299201	2539366	2538878	275932	275457	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC11E10.03	pef1	mug1	p31	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-104.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299202	2539527	2538959	276089	275533	SPCC338.16	SPCC18B5.11c	pof3	cds1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-180.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299203	2539487	2539023	276050	275596	SPCC895.05	SPCC594.05c	for3	spf1	-	spp1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-176.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299204	2539487	2539047	276050	275620	SPCC895.05	SPCC1223.06	for3	tea1	-	alp8	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-324.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299205	2539215	2539050	275785	275623	SPCC285.16c	SPCC11E10.08	msh6	rik1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-122.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299206	2538930	2539366	275506	275932	SPCC188.13c	SPCC16C4.11	dcr1	pef1	SPCC584.10c	p31	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-113.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299207	2539023	2539366	275596	275932	SPCC594.05c	SPCC16C4.11	spf1	pef1	spp1	p31	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-133.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299208	2539487	2539366	276050	275932	SPCC895.05	SPCC16C4.11	for3	pef1	-	p31	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-149.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299209	2539487	2539444	276050	276007	SPCC895.05	SPCC576.13	for3	swc5	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-137.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299210	2539487	2539604	276050	276162	SPCC895.05	SPBC1105.14	for3	rsv2	-	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-115.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299211	2540911	2539604	277427	276162	SPBC651.10	SPBC1105.14	nse5	rsv2	-	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-130.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299212	2538976	2539667	275550	276222	SPCC1840.04	SPBC13G1.08c	pca1	ash2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-106.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299213	2539444	2539667	276007	276222	SPCC576.13	SPBC13G1.08c	swc5	ash2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-151.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299214	2539487	2539667	276050	276222	SPCC895.05	SPBC13G1.08c	for3	ash2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-118.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299215	2539999	2539667	276543	276222	SPBC1734.15	SPBC13G1.08c	rsc4	ash2	brd1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-105.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299216	2540128	2539667	276665	276222	SPBC15D4.03	SPBC13G1.08c	slm9	ash2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-267.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299217	2540498	2539667	277026	276222	SPBC27.02c	SPBC13G1.08c	ask1	ash2	mug181	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-146.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299218	2540821	2539667	277339	276222	SPBC800.03	SPBC13G1.08c	clr3	ash2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-110.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299219	2539487	2539668	276050	276223	SPCC895.05	SPBC11B10.10c	for3	pht1	-	pi001	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-191.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299220	2539527	2539668	276089	276223	SPCC338.16	SPBC11B10.10c	pof3	pht1	-	pi001	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-102.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299221	2539667	2539668	276222	276223	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC11B10.10c	ash2	pht1	-	pi001	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-244.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299222	2539726	2539668	276278	276223	SPBC13E7.08c	SPBC11B10.10c	leo1	pht1	SPBC13E7.08c	pi001	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-205.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299223	2539953	2539668	276497	276223	SPBC1709.11c	SPBC11B10.10c	png2	pht1	-	pi001	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-115.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299224	2540128	2539668	276665	276223	SPBC15D4.03	SPBC11B10.10c	slm9	pht1	-	pi001	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-213.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299225	2540219	2539668	276752	276223	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC11B10.10c	hip1	pht1	hir1	pi001	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-138.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299226	2540220	2539668	276753	276223	SPBC337.03	SPBC11B10.10c	rhn1	pht1	SPBC337.03|iss4	pi001	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-164.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299227	2539527	2539686	276089	276241	SPCC338.16	SPBC1734.06	pof3	rhp18	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-165.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299228	2540348	2539686	276877	276241	SPBC29A10.05	SPBC1734.06	exo1	rhp18	mut2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-128.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299229	2540997	2539686	277513	276241	SPBC3H7.06c	SPBC1734.06	pof9	rhp18	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-116.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299230	2541120	2539686	277635	276241	SPBC649.03	SPBC1734.06	rhp14	rhp18	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-357.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299231	2539366	2539689	275932	276244	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC1861.03	pef1	mak10	p31	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-117.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299232	2539487	2539689	276050	276244	SPCC895.05	SPBC1861.03	for3	mak10	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-175.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299233	2540337	2539689	276866	276244	SPBC28F2.11	SPBC1861.03	hmo1	mak10	SPBC28F2.11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-220.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299234	3361323	2539689	280399	276244	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC1861.03	swi3	mak10	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-150.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299235	2539232	2539700	275802	276253	SPCC1223.04c	SPBC1685.15c	set11	klp6	mug76	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-149.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299236	2539527	2539700	276089	276253	SPCC338.16	SPBC1685.15c	pof3	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-391.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299237	2540320	2539700	276850	276253	SPBC3D6.04c	SPBC1685.15c	mad1	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-304.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299238	2540498	2539700	277026	276253	SPBC27.02c	SPBC1685.15c	ask1	klp6	mug181	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-367.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299239	2540664	2539700	277189	276253	SPBC215.02	SPBC1685.15c	bob1	klp6	gim5	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-116.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299240	2540911	2539700	277427	276253	SPBC651.10	SPBC1685.15c	nse5	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-140.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299241	2540887	2539726	277404	276278	SPBC4F6.15c	SPBC13E7.08c	swi10	leo1	rad23	SPBC13E7.08c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-170.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299242	2541051	2539726	277566	276278	SPBC3E7.08c	SPBC13E7.08c	rad13	leo1	-	SPBC13E7.08c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-107.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299243	2540489	2539767	277017	276318	SPBC25H2.03	SPBC1703.06	SPBC25H2.03	pof10	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-139.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299244	2540887	2539835	277404	276384	SPBC4F6.15c	SPBC15D4.06	swi10	naa30	rad23	mak3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-112.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299245	2539487	2539857	276050	276404	SPCC895.05	SPBC1604.20c	for3	tea2	-	klp4	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-346.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299246	2540248	2539857	276780	276404	SPBC336.03	SPBC1604.20c	efc25	tea2	-	klp4	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-244.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299247	2541208	2539857	277722	276404	SPBC887.04c	SPBC1604.20c	lub1	tea2	-	klp4	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-106.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299248	2540911	2539891	277427	276437	SPBC651.10	SPBC1347.08c	nse5	SPBC1347.08c	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-132.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299249	2541160	2539891	277675	276437	SPBC725.09c	SPBC1347.08c	hob3	SPBC1347.08c	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-130.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299250	2539023	2539999	275596	276543	SPCC594.05c	SPBC1734.15	spf1	rsc4	spp1	brd1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-126.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299251	2539527	2539999	276089	276543	SPCC338.16	SPBC1734.15	pof3	rsc4	-	brd1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-124.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299252	2540436	2539999	276964	276543	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC1734.15	ngg1	rsc4	ada3|kap1	brd1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-221.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299253	2540997	2539999	277513	276543	SPBC3H7.06c	SPBC1734.15	pof9	rsc4	-	brd1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-116.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299254	2541120	2539999	277635	276543	SPBC649.03	SPBC1734.15	rhp14	rsc4	-	brd1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-129.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299255	3361323	2539999	280399	276543	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC1734.15	swi3	rsc4	-	brd1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-370.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299256	2540352	2540032	276881	276575	SPBC215.03c	SPBC1703.14c	csn1	top1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-124.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299257	2539050	2540060	275623	276598	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC106.01	rik1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-338.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299258	2540337	2540060	276866	276598	SPBC28F2.11	SPBC106.01	hmo1	mph1	SPBC28F2.11	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-128.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299259	2540352	2540060	276881	276598	SPBC215.03c	SPBC106.01	csn1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-156.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299260	2540887	2540060	277404	276598	SPBC4F6.15c	SPBC106.01	swi10	mph1	rad23	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-105.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299261	2539999	2540061	276543	276599	SPBC1734.15	SPBC119.12	rsc4	rud3	brd1	SPBC119.12	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-135.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299262	2540128	2540061	276665	276599	SPBC15D4.03	SPBC119.12	slm9	rud3	-	SPBC119.12	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-239.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299263	2540219	2540061	276752	276599	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC119.12	hip1	rud3	hir1	SPBC119.12	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-114.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299264	2540231	2540061	276763	276599	SPBC336.14c	SPBC119.12	ppk26	rud3	-	SPBC119.12	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-120.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299265	2540993	2540061	277509	276599	SPBC342.01c	SPBC119.12	alg6	rud3	SPBC3F6.06c	SPBC119.12	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-107.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299266	2538762	2540128	275345	276665	SPCC306.04c	SPBC15D4.03	set1	slm9	kmt2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-185.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299267	2538769	2540128	275352	276665	SPCC126.04c	SPBC15D4.03	sgf73	slm9	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-243.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299268	2538868	2540128	275448	276665	SPCC132.02	SPBC15D4.03	hst2	slm9	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-113.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299269	2539023	2540128	275596	276665	SPCC594.05c	SPBC15D4.03	spf1	slm9	spp1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-258.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299270	2539050	2540128	275623	276665	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC15D4.03	rik1	slm9	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-135.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299271	2539527	2540128	276089	276665	SPCC338.16	SPBC15D4.03	pof3	slm9	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-302.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299272	2539689	2540128	276244	276665	SPBC1861.03	SPBC15D4.03	mak10	slm9	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-146.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299273	2540314	2540128	276844	276665	SPBC2G5.03	SPBC15D4.03	ctu1	slm9	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-197.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299274	2540927	2540128	277443	276665	SPBC365.06	SPBC15D4.03	pmt3	slm9	smt3|ubl2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-122.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299275	2540993	2540128	277509	276665	SPBC342.01c	SPBC15D4.03	alg6	slm9	SPBC3F6.06c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-155.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299276	2540997	2540128	277513	276665	SPBC3H7.06c	SPBC15D4.03	pof9	slm9	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-109.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299277	2541270	2540128	277784	276665	SPBC902.02c	SPBC15D4.03	ctf18	slm9	chl12	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-197.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299278	2541337	2540128	277848	276665	SPBP35G2.13c	SPBC15D4.03	swc2	slm9	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-126.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299279	2538762	2540219	275345	276752	SPCC306.04c	SPBC31F10.13c	set1	hip1	kmt2	hir1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-110.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299280	2538769	2540219	275352	276752	SPCC126.04c	SPBC31F10.13c	sgf73	hip1	-	hir1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-154.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299281	2539023	2540219	275596	276752	SPCC594.05c	SPBC31F10.13c	spf1	hip1	spp1	hir1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-165.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299282	2539487	2540219	276050	276752	SPCC895.05	SPBC31F10.13c	for3	hip1	-	hir1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-105.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299283	2539527	2540219	276089	276752	SPCC338.16	SPBC31F10.13c	pof3	hip1	-	hir1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-275.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299284	2538976	2540220	275550	276753	SPCC1840.04	SPBC337.03	pca1	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-137.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299285	2539023	2540220	275596	276753	SPCC594.05c	SPBC337.03	spf1	rhn1	spp1	SPBC337.03|iss4	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-196.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299286	2539487	2540231	276050	276763	SPCC895.05	SPBC336.14c	for3	ppk26	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-124.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299287	2539527	2540231	276089	276763	SPCC338.16	SPBC336.14c	pof3	ppk26	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-128.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299288	2540911	2540231	277427	276763	SPBC651.10	SPBC336.14c	nse5	ppk26	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-135.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299289	2540993	2540231	277509	276763	SPBC342.01c	SPBC336.14c	alg6	ppk26	SPBC3F6.06c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-124.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299290	2540995	2540231	277511	276763	SPBC337.16	SPBC336.14c	cho1	ppk26	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-126.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299291	2539527	2540244	276089	276776	SPCC338.16	SPBC336.01	pof3	fbh1	-	fdh|fdh1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-355.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299292	2540911	2540244	277427	276776	SPBC651.10	SPBC336.01	nse5	fbh1	-	fdh|fdh1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-154.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299293	2539047	2540248	275620	276780	SPCC1223.06	SPBC336.03	tea1	efc25	alp8	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-415.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299294	2539366	2540248	275932	276780	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC336.03	pef1	efc25	p31	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-114.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299295	2540892	2540248	277408	276780	SPBC530.01	SPBC336.03	gyp1	efc25	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-232.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299296	2541160	2540248	277675	276780	SPBC725.09c	SPBC336.03	hob3	efc25	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-153.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299297	2539366	2540270	275932	276801	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC2G2.02	pef1	syj1	p31	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-248.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299298	2539050	2540314	275623	276844	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC2G5.03	rik1	ctu1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-119.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299299	2541160	2540314	277675	276844	SPBC725.09c	SPBC2G5.03	hob3	ctu1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-178.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299300	2538976	2540320	275550	276850	SPCC1840.04	SPBC3D6.04c	pca1	mad1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-148.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299301	2539366	2540320	275932	276850	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC3D6.04c	pef1	mad1	p31	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-103.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299302	2541270	2540320	277784	276850	SPBC902.02c	SPBC3D6.04c	ctf18	mad1	chl12	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-169.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299303	2539527	2540337	276089	276866	SPCC338.16	SPBC28F2.11	pof3	hmo1	-	SPBC28F2.11	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-134.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299304	2539579	2540337	276138	276866	SPCP31B10.05	SPBC28F2.11	tdp1	hmo1	-	SPBC28F2.11	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-138.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299305	2540911	2540337	277427	276866	SPBC651.10	SPBC28F2.11	nse5	hmo1	-	SPBC28F2.11	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-134.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299306	2541017	2540337	277532	276866	SPBC36.07	SPBC28F2.11	elp1	hmo1	iki3	SPBC28F2.11	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-138.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299307	3361323	2540337	280399	276866	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC28F2.11	swi3	hmo1	-	SPBC28F2.11	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-127.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299308	2540992	2540348	277508	276877	SPBC342.05	SPBC29A10.05	crb2	exo1	rhp9	mut2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-127.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299309	2541120	2540348	277635	276877	SPBC649.03	SPBC29A10.05	rhp14	exo1	-	mut2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-148.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299310	2539087	2540352	275659	276881	SPCC1259.13	SPBC215.03c	chk1	csn1	rad27	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-154.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299311	2539527	2540352	276089	276881	SPCC338.16	SPBC215.03c	pof3	csn1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-276.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299313	2540719	2540352	277242	276881	SPBC216.05	SPBC215.03c	rad3	csn1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-126.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299314	2540821	2540352	277339	276881	SPBC800.03	SPBC215.03c	clr3	csn1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-137.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299315	2540911	2540352	277427	276881	SPBC651.10	SPBC215.03c	nse5	csn1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-300.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299316	2541270	2540352	277784	276881	SPBC902.02c	SPBC215.03c	ctf18	csn1	chl12	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-176.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299317	3361323	2540352	280399	276881	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC215.03c	swi3	csn1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-181.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299318	2540911	2540383	277427	276912	SPBC651.10	SPBC31E1.02c	nse5	pmr1	-	cps5|pgak2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-108.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299319	2540993	2540383	277509	276912	SPBC342.01c	SPBC31E1.02c	alg6	pmr1	SPBC3F6.06c	cps5|pgak2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-120.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299320	2538769	2540436	275352	276964	SPCC126.04c	SPBC28F2.10c	sgf73	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-192.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299321	2539487	2540468	276050	276996	SPCC895.05	SPBC23G7.04c	for3	nif1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-236.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299322	2540887	2540489	277404	277017	SPBC4F6.15c	SPBC25H2.03	swi10	SPBC25H2.03	rad23	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-107.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299323	2539366	2540498	275932	277026	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC27.02c	pef1	ask1	p31	mug181	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-105.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299324	2539527	2540498	276089	277026	SPCC338.16	SPBC27.02c	pof3	ask1	-	mug181	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-304.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299325	2540231	2540498	276763	277026	SPBC336.14c	SPBC27.02c	ppk26	ask1	-	mug181	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-173.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299326	2541120	2540498	277635	277026	SPBC649.03	SPBC27.02c	rhp14	ask1	-	mug181	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-118.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299327	2541270	2540498	277784	277026	SPBC902.02c	SPBC27.02c	ctf18	ask1	chl12	mug181	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-189.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299328	2541337	2540498	277848	277026	SPBP35G2.13c	SPBC27.02c	swc2	ask1	-	mug181	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-121.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299329	2540498	2540589	277026	277115	SPBC27.02c	SPBC20F10.06	ask1	mad2	mug181	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-125.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299330	2541051	2540589	277566	277115	SPBC3E7.08c	SPBC20F10.06	rad13	mad2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-104.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299331	2540337	2540664	276866	277189	SPBC28F2.11	SPBC215.02	hmo1	bob1	SPBC28F2.11	gim5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-148.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299332	2540498	2540664	277026	277189	SPBC27.02c	SPBC215.02	ask1	bob1	mug181	gim5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-221.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299333	2540337	2540694	276866	277218	SPBC28F2.11	SPBC19C7.10	hmo1	bqt4	SPBC28F2.11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-126.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299334	2540911	2540694	277427	277218	SPBC651.10	SPBC19C7.10	nse5	bqt4	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-138.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299335	2541209	2540694	277723	277218	SPBC887.10	SPBC19C7.10	mcs4	bqt4	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-113.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299336	2540244	2540695	276776	277219	SPBC336.01	SPBC19G7.01c	fbh1	msh2	fdh|fdh1	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-103.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299337	2540911	2540695	277427	277219	SPBC651.10	SPBC19G7.01c	nse5	msh2	-	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-112.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299338	2541051	2540695	277566	277219	SPBC3E7.08c	SPBC19G7.01c	rad13	msh2	-	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-108.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299339	2540244	2540719	276776	277242	SPBC336.01	SPBC216.05	fbh1	rad3	fdh|fdh1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-122.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299340	2540348	2540719	276877	277242	SPBC29A10.05	SPBC216.05	exo1	rad3	mut2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-148.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299341	2540911	2540719	277427	277242	SPBC651.10	SPBC216.05	nse5	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-437.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299342	2541120	2540719	277635	277242	SPBC649.03	SPBC216.05	rhp14	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-257.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299343	2541209	2540719	277723	277242	SPBC887.10	SPBC216.05	mcs4	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-123.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299344	2541270	2540719	277784	277242	SPBC902.02c	SPBC216.05	ctf18	rad3	chl12	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-112.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299345	3361323	2540719	280399	277242	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC216.05	swi3	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-190.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299346	2538769	2540821	275352	277339	SPCC126.04c	SPBC800.03	sgf73	clr3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-108.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299347	2539050	2540821	275623	277339	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC800.03	rik1	clr3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-220.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299348	2539527	2540887	276089	277404	SPCC338.16	SPBC4F6.15c	pof3	swi10	-	rad23	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-111.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299349	2539579	2540887	276138	277404	SPCP31B10.05	SPBC4F6.15c	tdp1	swi10	-	rad23	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-374.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299351	2540911	2540887	277427	277404	SPBC651.10	SPBC4F6.15c	nse5	swi10	-	rad23	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-300.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299352	2541120	2540887	277635	277404	SPBC649.03	SPBC4F6.15c	rhp14	swi10	-	rad23	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-139.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299353	2539487	2540892	276050	277408	SPCC895.05	SPBC530.01	for3	gyp1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-222.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299354	2541160	2540892	277675	277408	SPBC725.09c	SPBC530.01	hob3	gyp1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-103.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299355	2541209	2540892	277723	277408	SPBC887.10	SPBC530.01	mcs4	gyp1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-147.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299356	2538976	2540911	275550	277427	SPCC1840.04	SPBC651.10	pca1	nse5	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-139.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299357	2539050	2540911	275623	277427	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC651.10	rik1	nse5	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-184.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299358	2539579	2540911	276138	277427	SPCP31B10.05	SPBC651.10	tdp1	nse5	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-351.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299359	2541209	2540911	277723	277427	SPBC887.10	SPBC651.10	mcs4	nse5	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-168.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299360	2541270	2540911	277784	277427	SPBC902.02c	SPBC651.10	ctf18	nse5	chl12	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-282.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299361	2541120	2540927	277635	277443	SPBC649.03	SPBC365.06	rhp14	pmt3	-	smt3|ubl2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-132.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299362	2540887	2540942	277404	277458	SPBC4F6.15c	SPBC3H7.14	swi10	mug176	rad23	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-118.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299363	2539527	2540992	276089	277508	SPCC338.16	SPBC342.05	pof3	crb2	-	rhp9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-414.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299364	2540887	2540992	277404	277508	SPBC4F6.15c	SPBC342.05	swi10	crb2	rad23	rhp9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-154.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299365	2541120	2540992	277635	277508	SPBC649.03	SPBC342.05	rhp14	crb2	-	rhp9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-306.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299366	2540911	2540993	277427	277509	SPBC651.10	SPBC342.01c	nse5	alg6	-	SPBC3F6.06c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-102.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299367	2539487	2540995	276050	277511	SPCC895.05	SPBC337.16	for3	cho1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-151.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299368	2539527	2540995	276089	277511	SPCC338.16	SPBC337.16	pof3	cho1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-117.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299369	2540821	2540995	277339	277511	SPBC800.03	SPBC337.16	clr3	cho1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-190.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299370	2541209	2540995	277723	277511	SPBC887.10	SPBC337.16	mcs4	cho1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-118.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299371	2538722	2540997	275306	277513	SPCC4F11.04c	SPBC3H7.06c	imt2	pof9	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-107.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299372	2541160	2541017	277675	277532	SPBC725.09c	SPBC36.07	hob3	elp1	-	iki3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-108.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299373	2540911	2541045	277427	277560	SPBC651.10	SPBC543.03c	nse5	pku80	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-384.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299374	2539366	2541051	275932	277566	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC3E7.08c	pef1	rad13	p31	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-112.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299375	2540911	2541051	277427	277566	SPBC651.10	SPBC3E7.08c	nse5	rad13	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-228.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299376	2541120	2541051	277635	277566	SPBC649.03	SPBC3E7.08c	rhp14	rad13	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-136.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299377	2539087	2541120	275659	277635	SPCC1259.13	SPBC649.03	chk1	rhp14	rad27	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-349.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299378	2539366	2541120	275932	277635	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC649.03	pef1	rhp14	p31	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-105.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299379	2539527	2541120	276089	277635	SPCC338.16	SPBC649.03	pof3	rhp14	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-114.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299380	2540911	2541120	277427	277635	SPBC651.10	SPBC649.03	nse5	rhp14	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-366.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299381	2541337	2541120	277848	277635	SPBP35G2.13c	SPBC649.03	swc2	rhp14	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-124.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299382	2539487	2541129	276050	277644	SPCC895.05	SPBC713.11c	for3	pmp3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-148.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299383	2539527	2541129	276089	277644	SPCC338.16	SPBC713.11c	pof3	pmp3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-132.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299384	2539487	2541160	276050	277675	SPCC895.05	SPBC725.09c	for3	hob3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-397.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299385	2539487	2541208	276050	277722	SPCC895.05	SPBC887.04c	for3	lub1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-116.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299386	2539487	2541209	276050	277723	SPCC895.05	SPBC887.10	for3	mcs4	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-338.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299387	2539527	2541270	276089	277784	SPCC338.16	SPBC902.02c	pof3	ctf18	-	chl12	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-278.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299388	2539527	2541337	276089	277848	SPCC338.16	SPBP35G2.13c	pof3	swc2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-188.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299389	2540887	2541443	277404	277948	SPBC4F6.15c	SPAC11E3.09	swi10	pyp3	rad23	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-115.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299390	2538868	2541465	275448	277967	SPCC132.02	SPAC30C2.02	hst2	mmd1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-191.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299391	2539487	2541465	276050	277967	SPCC895.05	SPAC30C2.02	for3	mmd1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-125.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299392	2540060	2541465	276598	277967	SPBC106.01	SPAC30C2.02	mph1	mmd1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-154.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299393	2540128	2541465	276665	277967	SPBC15D4.03	SPAC30C2.02	slm9	mmd1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-303.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299394	2540219	2541465	276752	277967	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC30C2.02	hip1	mmd1	hir1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-256.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299395	2540694	2541465	277218	277967	SPBC19C7.10	SPAC30C2.02	bqt4	mmd1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-277.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299396	2540352	2541468	276881	277970	SPBC215.03c	SPAC1F5.09c	csn1	shk2	-	pak2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-111.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299397	2540995	2541468	277511	277970	SPBC337.16	SPAC1F5.09c	cho1	shk2	-	pak2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-216.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299398	2539891	2541470	276437	277972	SPBC1347.08c	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC1347.08c	rpb9	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-103.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299399	2539487	2541498	276050	278000	SPCC895.05	SPAC227.10	for3	SPAC227.10	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-148.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299400	2540498	2541498	277026	278000	SPBC27.02c	SPAC227.10	ask1	SPAC227.10	mug181	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-112.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299401	2543456	2541498	279876	278000	SPAC3H1.05	SPAC227.10	SPAC3H1.05	SPAC227.10	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-453.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299402	2539579	2541512	276138	278013	SPCP31B10.05	SPAC11E3.08c	tdp1	nse6	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-321.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299403	2539668	2541512	276223	278013	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC11E3.08c	pht1	nse6	pi001	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-127.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299404	2539686	2541512	276241	278013	SPBC1734.06	SPAC11E3.08c	rhp18	nse6	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-159.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299405	2539956	2541512	276500	278013	SPBC16E9.11c	SPAC11E3.08c	pub3	nse6	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-115.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299406	2540244	2541512	276776	278013	SPBC336.01	SPAC11E3.08c	fbh1	nse6	fdh|fdh1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-241.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299407	2540352	2541512	276881	278013	SPBC215.03c	SPAC11E3.08c	csn1	nse6	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-239.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299408	2540719	2541512	277242	278013	SPBC216.05	SPAC11E3.08c	rad3	nse6	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-251.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299409	2540887	2541512	277404	278013	SPBC4F6.15c	SPAC11E3.08c	swi10	nse6	rad23	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-307.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299410	2541045	2541512	277560	278013	SPBC543.03c	SPAC11E3.08c	pku80	nse6	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-295.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299411	2541051	2541512	277566	278013	SPBC3E7.08c	SPAC11E3.08c	rad13	nse6	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-169.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299412	2541120	2541512	277635	278013	SPBC649.03	SPAC11E3.08c	rhp14	nse6	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-230.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299413	2541209	2541512	277723	278013	SPBC887.10	SPAC11E3.08c	mcs4	nse6	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-110.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299414	2541270	2541512	277784	278013	SPBC902.02c	SPAC11E3.08c	ctf18	nse6	chl12	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-196.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299415	2541580	2541512	278077	278013	SPAC1687.05	SPAC11E3.08c	pli1	nse6	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-390.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299416	2541627	2541512	278123	278013	SPAC1F5.08c	SPAC11E3.08c	yam8	nse6	ehs1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-124.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299417	2541871	2541512	278361	278013	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC11E3.08c	res2	nse6	mcs1|pct1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-125.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299418	2542032	2541512	278514	278013	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC11E3.08c	pnk1	nse6	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-272.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299419	2542127	2541512	278603	278013	SPAC1952.12c	SPAC11E3.08c	csn71	nse6	csn7|csn7a	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-170.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299420	2542194	2541512	278669	278013	SPAC17G6.17	SPAC11E3.08c	pof8	nse6	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-109.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299421	2543078	2541512	279511	278013	SPAC31A2.15c	SPAC11E3.08c	dcc1	nse6	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-177.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299422	2543211	2541512	279640	278013	SPAC12B10.15c	SPAC11E3.08c	SPAC12B10.15c	nse6	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-142.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299423	2543240	2541512	279668	278013	SPAC694.06c	SPAC11E3.08c	mrc1	nse6	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-277.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299424	2543289	2541512	279714	278013	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC11E3.08c	rad26	nse6	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-257.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299425	2543577	2541512	279992	278013	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC11E3.08c	srs2	nse6	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-364.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299426	3361323	2541512	280399	278013	SPBC30D10.04	SPAC11E3.08c	swi3	nse6	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-103.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299427	2539527	2541529	276089	278029	SPCC338.16	SPAC1687.13c	pof3	csn5	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-132.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299428	2540911	2541529	277427	278029	SPBC651.10	SPAC1687.13c	nse5	csn5	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-196.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299429	2543237	2541529	279665	278029	SPAC6B12.02c	SPAC1687.13c	mus7	csn5	mms22	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-181.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299430	2539050	2541552	275623	278051	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC1142.08	rik1	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-126.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299431	2540060	2541552	276598	278051	SPBC106.01	SPAC1142.08	mph1	fhl1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPAC8C9.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-117.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299432	2540128	2541552	276665	278051	SPBC15D4.03	SPAC1142.08	slm9	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-122.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299433	2541468	2541552	277970	278051	SPAC1F5.09c	SPAC1142.08	shk2	fhl1	pak2	SPAC8C9.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-162.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299434	2541627	2541552	278123	278051	SPAC1F5.08c	SPAC1142.08	yam8	fhl1	ehs1	SPAC8C9.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-104.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299435	2542032	2541552	278514	278051	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC1142.08	pnk1	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-117.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299436	2542175	2541552	278650	278051	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC1142.08	mkh1	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-126.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299437	2543372	2541552	279794	278051	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC1142.08	ase1	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-205.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299438	2540128	2541580	276665	278077	SPBC15D4.03	SPAC1687.05	slm9	pli1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-117.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299439	2540498	2541580	277026	278077	SPBC27.02c	SPAC1687.05	ask1	pli1	mug181	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-230.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299440	2540719	2541580	277242	278077	SPBC216.05	SPAC1687.05	rad3	pli1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-156.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299441	2540911	2541580	277427	278077	SPBC651.10	SPAC1687.05	nse5	pli1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-367.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299442	2541017	2541580	277532	278077	SPBC36.07	SPAC1687.05	elp1	pli1	iki3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-109.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299443	2541614	2541580	278111	278077	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC1687.05	elp3	pli1	kat9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-131.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299444	2542007	2541580	278490	278077	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC1687.05	rad57	pli1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-244.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299445	2542207	2541580	278682	278077	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC1687.05	ddb1	pli1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-105.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299446	2542418	2541580	278881	278077	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC1687.05	dad2	pli1	hos2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-207.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299447	2542592	2541580	279047	278077	SPAC328.01c	SPAC1687.05	msn5	pli1	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-208.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299448	2543164	2541580	279595	278077	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC1687.05	rad2	pli1	fen1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-194.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299449	2543237	2541580	279665	278077	SPAC6B12.02c	SPAC1687.05	mus7	pli1	mms22	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-233.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299450	2543289	2541580	279714	278077	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC1687.05	rad26	pli1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-142.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299451	2539050	2541614	275623	278111	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC29A4.20	rik1	elp3	-	kat9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-116.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299452	2539366	2541614	275932	278111	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC29A4.20	pef1	elp3	p31	kat9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-193.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299453	2539999	2541614	276543	278111	SPBC1734.15	SPAC29A4.20	rsc4	elp3	brd1	kat9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-249.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299454	2540231	2541614	276763	278111	SPBC336.14c	SPAC29A4.20	ppk26	elp3	-	kat9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-131.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299455	2540821	2541614	277339	278111	SPBC800.03	SPAC29A4.20	clr3	elp3	-	kat9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-107.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299456	2541160	2541614	277675	278111	SPBC725.09c	SPAC29A4.20	hob3	elp3	-	kat9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-187.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299457	2542592	2541614	279047	278111	SPAC328.01c	SPAC29A4.20	msn5	elp3	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	kat9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-199.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299458	2540061	2541627	276599	278123	SPBC119.12	SPAC1F5.08c	rud3	yam8	SPBC119.12	ehs1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-149.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299459	2540231	2541627	276763	278123	SPBC336.14c	SPAC1F5.08c	ppk26	yam8	-	ehs1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-107.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299460	2540383	2541627	276912	278123	SPBC31E1.02c	SPAC1F5.08c	pmr1	yam8	cps5|pgak2	ehs1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-123.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299461	2540887	2541627	277404	278123	SPBC4F6.15c	SPAC1F5.08c	swi10	yam8	rad23	ehs1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-141.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299462	2540993	2541627	277509	278123	SPBC342.01c	SPAC1F5.08c	alg6	yam8	SPBC3F6.06c	ehs1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-116.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299463	2541051	2541627	277566	278123	SPBC3E7.08c	SPAC1F5.08c	rad13	yam8	-	ehs1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-155.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299464	2541160	2541627	277675	278123	SPBC725.09c	SPAC1F5.08c	hob3	yam8	-	ehs1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-341.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299465	2541961	2541627	278448	278123	SPAC23C4.02	SPAC1F5.08c	crn1	yam8	-	ehs1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-146.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299466	2543378	2541627	279800	278123	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAC1F5.08c	pac10	yam8	-	ehs1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-106.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299467	2543384	2541627	279806	278123	SPAC637.06	SPAC1F5.08c	gmh5	yam8	SPAC637.06	ehs1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-306.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299468	2539527	2541633	276089	278129	SPCC338.16	SPAC664.01c	pof3	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-122.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299469	2539667	2541633	276222	278129	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC664.01c	ash2	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-111.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299470	2539700	2541633	276253	278129	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC664.01c	klp6	swi6	SPBC649.01c|sot2	SPAC824.10c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-232.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299471	2540060	2541633	276598	278129	SPBC106.01	SPAC664.01c	mph1	swi6	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPAC824.10c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-247.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299472	2540128	2541633	276665	278129	SPBC15D4.03	SPAC664.01c	slm9	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-160.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299473	2540352	2541633	276881	278129	SPBC215.03c	SPAC664.01c	csn1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-119.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299474	2540887	2541633	277404	278129	SPBC4F6.15c	SPAC664.01c	swi10	swi6	rad23	SPAC824.10c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-105.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299475	2543240	2541633	279668	278129	SPAC694.06c	SPAC664.01c	mrc1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-240.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299476	2539527	2541643	276089	278139	SPCC338.16	SPAC14C4.13	pof3	rad17	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-348.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299477	2540348	2541643	276877	278139	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC14C4.13	exo1	rad17	mut2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-103.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299478	2540352	2541643	276881	278139	SPBC215.03c	SPAC14C4.13	csn1	rad17	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-268.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299479	2540887	2541643	277404	278139	SPBC4F6.15c	SPAC14C4.13	swi10	rad17	rad23	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-115.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299480	2541120	2541643	277635	278139	SPBC649.03	SPAC14C4.13	rhp14	rad17	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-348.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299481	2542007	2541643	278490	278139	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC14C4.13	rad57	rad17	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-475.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299482	2542207	2541643	278682	278139	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC14C4.13	ddb1	rad17	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-173.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299483	2543078	2541643	279511	278139	SPAC31A2.15c	SPAC14C4.13	dcc1	rad17	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-104.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299484	2543436	2541643	279856	278139	SPAC823.05c	SPAC14C4.13	tlg2	rad17	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-174.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299485	2539999	2541670	276543	278166	SPBC1734.15	SPAC24H6.13	rsc4	SPAC24H6.13	brd1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-145.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299486	2540383	2541670	276912	278166	SPBC31E1.02c	SPAC24H6.13	pmr1	SPAC24H6.13	cps5|pgak2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-136.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299487	2543384	2541670	279806	278166	SPAC637.06	SPAC24H6.13	gmh5	SPAC24H6.13	SPAC637.06	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-337.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299488	2543577	2541670	279992	278166	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC24H6.13	srs2	SPAC24H6.13	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-110.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299489	2539527	2541746	276089	278240	SPCC338.16	SPAC20G4.04c	pof3	hus1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-340.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299490	2539891	2541746	276437	278240	SPBC1347.08c	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC1347.08c	hus1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-117.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299491	2540352	2541746	276881	278240	SPBC215.03c	SPAC20G4.04c	csn1	hus1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-340.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299492	2541120	2541746	277635	278240	SPBC649.03	SPAC20G4.04c	rhp14	hus1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-303.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299493	2542007	2541746	278490	278240	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC20G4.04c	rad57	hus1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-431.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299494	2543436	2541746	279856	278240	SPAC823.05c	SPAC20G4.04c	tlg2	hus1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-145.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299495	3361323	2541746	280399	278240	SPBC30D10.04	SPAC20G4.04c	swi3	hus1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-394.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299496	2543078	2541812	279511	278303	SPAC31A2.15c	SPAC23G3.12c	dcc1	SPAC23G3.12c	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-102.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299497	2539857	2541871	276404	278361	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC22F3.09c	tea2	res2	klp4	mcs1|pct1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-162.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299498	2540128	2541871	276665	278361	SPBC15D4.03	SPAC22F3.09c	slm9	res2	-	mcs1|pct1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-399.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299499	2540219	2541871	276752	278361	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC22F3.09c	hip1	res2	hir1	mcs1|pct1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-213.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299500	2540436	2541871	276964	278361	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC22F3.09c	ngg1	res2	ada3|kap1	mcs1|pct1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-130.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299501	2540498	2541871	277026	278361	SPBC27.02c	SPAC22F3.09c	ask1	res2	mug181	mcs1|pct1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-228.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299502	2540887	2541871	277404	278361	SPBC4F6.15c	SPAC22F3.09c	swi10	res2	rad23	mcs1|pct1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-185.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299503	2543164	2541871	279595	278361	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC22F3.09c	rad2	res2	fen1	mcs1|pct1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-128.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299504	2543237	2541871	279665	278361	SPAC6B12.02c	SPAC22F3.09c	mus7	res2	mms22	mcs1|pct1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-129.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299505	2539366	2541947	275932	278434	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC2G11.05c	pef1	rim20	p31	SPAC2G11.05c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-121.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299506	2541670	2541961	278166	278448	SPAC24H6.13	SPAC23C4.02	SPAC24H6.13	crn1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-114.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299507	2543324	2541961	279747	278448	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC23C4.02	vps17	crn1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-138.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299508	2543390	2541961	279812	278448	SPAC631.01c	SPAC23C4.02	acp2	crn1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-233.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299509	2539050	2542007	275623	278490	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC20H4.07	rik1	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-135.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299510	2539087	2542007	275659	278490	SPCC1259.13	SPAC20H4.07	chk1	rad57	rad27	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-356.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299511	2539545	2542007	276106	278490	SPCC4B3.12	SPAC20H4.07	set9	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-172.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299512	2539686	2542007	276241	278490	SPBC1734.06	SPAC20H4.07	rhp18	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-389.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299513	2539956	2542007	276500	278490	SPBC16E9.11c	SPAC20H4.07	pub3	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-190.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299514	2540115	2542007	276652	278490	SPBC1778.02	SPAC20H4.07	rap1	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-209.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299515	2540348	2542007	276877	278490	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC20H4.07	exo1	rad57	mut2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-127.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299516	2540468	2542007	276996	278490	SPBC23G7.04c	SPAC20H4.07	nif1	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-246.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299517	2540498	2542007	277026	278490	SPBC27.02c	SPAC20H4.07	ask1	rad57	mug181	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-159.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299518	2540719	2542007	277242	278490	SPBC216.05	SPAC20H4.07	rad3	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-440.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299519	2540887	2542007	277404	278490	SPBC4F6.15c	SPAC20H4.07	swi10	rad57	rad23	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-152.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299520	2540992	2542007	277508	278490	SPBC342.05	SPAC20H4.07	crb2	rad57	rhp9	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-386.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299521	2540997	2542007	277513	278490	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC20H4.07	pof9	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-103.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299522	2541051	2542007	277566	278490	SPBC3E7.08c	SPAC20H4.07	rad13	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-117.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299523	2541120	2542007	277635	278490	SPBC649.03	SPAC20H4.07	rhp14	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-147.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299524	2541633	2542007	278129	278490	SPAC664.01c	SPAC20H4.07	swi6	rad57	SPAC824.10c	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-124.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299525	2543164	2542007	279595	278490	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC20H4.07	rad2	rad57	fen1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-253.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299526	2543289	2542007	279714	278490	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC20H4.07	rad26	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-469.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299527	2539366	2542032	275932	278514	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC23C11.04c	pef1	pnk1	p31	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-275.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299528	2539999	2542032	276543	278514	SPBC1734.15	SPAC23C11.04c	rsc4	pnk1	brd1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-318.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299529	2540220	2542032	276753	278514	SPBC337.03	SPAC23C11.04c	rhn1	pnk1	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-160.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299530	2540337	2542032	276866	278514	SPBC28F2.11	SPAC23C11.04c	hmo1	pnk1	SPBC28F2.11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-174.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299531	2540911	2542032	277427	278514	SPBC651.10	SPAC23C11.04c	nse5	pnk1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-238.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299532	2541160	2542032	277675	278514	SPBC725.09c	SPAC23C11.04c	hob3	pnk1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-115.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299533	2542516	2542032	278974	278514	SPAC2F7.04	SPAC23C11.04c	pmc2	pnk1	med1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-181.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299534	2543164	2542032	279595	278514	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC23C11.04c	rad2	pnk1	fen1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-210.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299535	2543577	2542032	279992	278514	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC23C11.04c	srs2	pnk1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-335.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299536	2543456	2542066	279876	278543	SPAC3H1.05	SPAC227.05	SPAC3H1.05	SPAC227.05	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-332.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299537	2540337	2542069	276866	278546	SPBC28F2.11	SPAC27D7.13c	hmo1	ssm4	SPBC28F2.11	SPAC637.01c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-169.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299538	2538930	2542123	275506	278599	SPCC188.13c	SPAC18G6.15	dcr1	mal3	SPCC584.10c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-172.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299539	2539050	2542123	275623	278599	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC18G6.15	rik1	mal3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-253.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299540	2539487	2542123	276050	278599	SPCC895.05	SPAC18G6.15	for3	mal3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-110.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299541	2540060	2542123	276598	278599	SPBC106.01	SPAC18G6.15	mph1	mal3	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-266.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299542	2540248	2542123	276780	278599	SPBC336.03	SPAC18G6.15	efc25	mal3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-181.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299543	2540320	2542123	276850	278599	SPBC3D6.04c	SPAC18G6.15	mad1	mal3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-116.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299544	2541947	2542123	278434	278599	SPAC2G11.05c	SPAC18G6.15	rim20	mal3	SPAC2G11.05c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-110.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299545	2542237	2542123	278709	278599	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC18G6.15	fin1	mal3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-123.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299546	2543372	2542123	279794	278599	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC18G6.15	ase1	mal3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-342.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299547	2540337	2542127	276866	278603	SPBC28F2.11	SPAC1952.12c	hmo1	csn71	SPBC28F2.11	csn7|csn7a	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-133.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299548	2540887	2542127	277404	278603	SPBC4F6.15c	SPAC1952.12c	swi10	csn71	rad23	csn7|csn7a	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-125.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299549	2540911	2542127	277427	278603	SPBC651.10	SPAC1952.12c	nse5	csn71	-	csn7|csn7a	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-203.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299550	2543237	2542127	279665	278603	SPAC6B12.02c	SPAC1952.12c	mus7	csn71	mms22	csn7|csn7a	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-212.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299551	2539023	2542136	275596	278612	SPCC594.05c	SPAC17A2.06c	spf1	vps8	spp1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-113.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299552	2539487	2542136	276050	278612	SPCC895.05	SPAC17A2.06c	for3	vps8	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-165.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299553	2539726	2542136	276278	278612	SPBC13E7.08c	SPAC17A2.06c	leo1	vps8	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-244.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299554	2539857	2542136	276404	278612	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC17A2.06c	tea2	vps8	klp4	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-150.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299555	2540314	2542136	276844	278612	SPBC2G5.03	SPAC17A2.06c	ctu1	vps8	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-128.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299556	2540436	2542136	276964	278612	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC17A2.06c	ngg1	vps8	ada3|kap1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-129.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299557	2540995	2542136	277511	278612	SPBC337.16	SPAC17A2.06c	cho1	vps8	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-114.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299558	2541017	2542136	277532	278612	SPBC36.07	SPAC17A2.06c	elp1	vps8	iki3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-161.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299559	2541209	2542136	277723	278612	SPBC887.10	SPAC17A2.06c	mcs4	vps8	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-137.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299560	2541614	2542136	278111	278612	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC17A2.06c	elp3	vps8	kat9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-106.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299561	2542207	2542136	278682	278612	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC17A2.06c	ddb1	vps8	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-118.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299562	2543324	2542136	279747	278612	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC17A2.06c	vps17	vps8	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-220.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299563	2543529	2542136	279947	278612	SPAC4C5.02c	SPAC17A2.06c	ryh1	vps8	hos1|sat7	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-214.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299564	2540821	2542141	277339	278617	SPBC800.03	SPAC17C9.05c	clr3	pmc3	-	med27|prk1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-109.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299565	2540887	2542195	277404	278670	SPBC4F6.15c	SPAC1834.07	swi10	klp3	rad23	krp1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-105.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299566	2540128	2542200	276665	278675	SPBC15D4.03	SPAC19D5.01	slm9	pyp2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-139.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299567	2543324	2542200	279747	278675	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC19D5.01	vps17	pyp2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-174.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299568	2543529	2542200	279947	278675	SPAC4C5.02c	SPAC19D5.01	ryh1	pyp2	hos1|sat7	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-145.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299569	2538959	2542207	275533	278682	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC17H9.10c	cds1	ddb1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-424.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299570	2539087	2542207	275659	278682	SPCC1259.13	SPAC17H9.10c	chk1	ddb1	rad27	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-319.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299571	2539366	2542207	275932	278682	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC17H9.10c	pef1	ddb1	p31	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-143.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299572	2540060	2542207	276598	278682	SPBC106.01	SPAC17H9.10c	mph1	ddb1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-128.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299573	2540219	2542207	276752	278682	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC17H9.10c	hip1	ddb1	hir1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-133.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299574	2540244	2542207	276776	278682	SPBC336.01	SPAC17H9.10c	fbh1	ddb1	fdh|fdh1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-233.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299575	2540337	2542207	276866	278682	SPBC28F2.11	SPAC17H9.10c	hmo1	ddb1	SPBC28F2.11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-134.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299576	2540719	2542207	277242	278682	SPBC216.05	SPAC17H9.10c	rad3	ddb1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-222.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299577	2540911	2542207	277427	278682	SPBC651.10	SPAC17H9.10c	nse5	ddb1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-143.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299578	2540992	2542207	277508	278682	SPBC342.05	SPAC17H9.10c	crb2	ddb1	rhp9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-267.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299579	2541045	2542207	277560	278682	SPBC543.03c	SPAC17H9.10c	pku80	ddb1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-120.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299580	2541270	2542207	277784	278682	SPBC902.02c	SPAC17H9.10c	ctf18	ddb1	chl12	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-134.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299581	2541746	2542207	278240	278682	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC17H9.10c	hus1	ddb1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-247.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299582	2543164	2542207	279595	278682	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC17H9.10c	rad2	ddb1	fen1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-113.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299583	2543237	2542207	279665	278682	SPAC6B12.02c	SPAC17H9.10c	mus7	ddb1	mms22	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-120.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299584	2543240	2542207	279668	278682	SPAC694.06c	SPAC17H9.10c	mrc1	ddb1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-182.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299585	2543289	2542207	279714	278682	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC17H9.10c	rad26	ddb1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-284.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299586	2543544	2542207	279961	278682	SPAC664.07c	SPAC17H9.10c	rad9	ddb1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-115.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299587	2538762	2542237	275345	278709	SPCC306.04c	SPAC19E9.02	set1	fin1	kmt2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-108.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299588	2538976	2542237	275550	278709	SPCC1840.04	SPAC19E9.02	pca1	fin1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-148.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299589	2539023	2542237	275596	278709	SPCC594.05c	SPAC19E9.02	spf1	fin1	spp1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-107.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299590	2539050	2542237	275623	278709	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC19E9.02	rik1	fin1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-236.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299591	2539668	2542237	276223	278709	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC19E9.02	pht1	fin1	pi001	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-149.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299592	2539700	2542237	276253	278709	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC19E9.02	klp6	fin1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-222.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299593	2540060	2542237	276598	278709	SPBC106.01	SPAC19E9.02	mph1	fin1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-347.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299594	2540664	2542237	277189	278709	SPBC215.02	SPAC19E9.02	bob1	fin1	gim5	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-161.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299595	2540887	2542237	277404	278709	SPBC4F6.15c	SPAC19E9.02	swi10	fin1	rad23	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-110.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299596	2541270	2542237	277784	278709	SPBC902.02c	SPAC19E9.02	ctf18	fin1	chl12	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-341.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299597	2541498	2542237	278000	278709	SPAC227.10	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC227.10	fin1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-234.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299598	2541633	2542237	278129	278709	SPAC664.01c	SPAC19E9.02	swi6	fin1	SPAC824.10c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-182.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299599	2542810	2542237	279258	278709	SPAC6F6.02c	SPAC19E9.02	pof5	fin1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-104.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299600	2543078	2542237	279511	278709	SPAC31A2.15c	SPAC19E9.02	dcc1	fin1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-141.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299601	2543106	2542237	279538	278709	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC3A11.13	fin1	SPAC3H5.02	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-128.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299602	2539366	2542295	275932	278763	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC17H9.03c	pef1	rdl1	p31	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-176.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299603	2539700	2542311	276253	278777	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC16A10.05c	klp6	dad1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-184.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299604	2542252	2542311	278722	278777	SPAC17A2.13c	SPAC16A10.05c	rad25	dad1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-102.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299605	2539487	2542327	276050	278793	SPCC895.05	SPAC16C9.06c	for3	upf1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-109.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299606	2542007	2542327	278490	278793	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC16C9.06c	rad57	upf1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-111.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299607	2539050	2542358	275623	278823	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC1782.09c	rik1	clp1	-	flp1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-189.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299608	2539857	2542358	276404	278823	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC1782.09c	tea2	clp1	klp4	flp1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-181.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299609	2540498	2542358	277026	278823	SPBC27.02c	SPAC1782.09c	ask1	clp1	mug181	flp1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-318.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299610	2542123	2542358	278599	278823	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC1782.09c	mal3	clp1	-	flp1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-106.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299611	2542418	2542358	278881	278823	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC1782.09c	dad2	clp1	hos2	flp1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-225.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299612	2543372	2542358	279794	278823	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC1782.09c	ase1	clp1	-	flp1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-272.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299613	2542207	2542409	278682	278873	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC17G8.10c	ddb1	dma1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-104.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299614	2539527	2542418	276089	278881	SPCC338.16	SPAC1805.07c	pof3	dad2	-	hos2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-262.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299615	2539667	2542418	276222	278881	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC1805.07c	ash2	dad2	-	hos2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-136.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299616	2539700	2542418	276253	278881	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC1805.07c	klp6	dad2	SPBC649.01c|sot2	hos2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-391.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299617	2540231	2542418	276763	278881	SPBC336.14c	SPAC1805.07c	ppk26	dad2	-	hos2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-173.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299618	2540320	2542418	276850	278881	SPBC3D6.04c	SPAC1805.07c	mad1	dad2	-	hos2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-107.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299619	2540664	2542418	277189	278881	SPBC215.02	SPAC1805.07c	bob1	dad2	gim5	hos2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-176.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299620	2540887	2542418	277404	278881	SPBC4F6.15c	SPAC1805.07c	swi10	dad2	rad23	hos2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-107.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299621	2541270	2542418	277784	278881	SPBC902.02c	SPAC1805.07c	ctf18	dad2	chl12	hos2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-178.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299622	2541337	2542418	277848	278881	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC1805.07c	swc2	dad2	-	hos2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-115.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299623	2541871	2542418	278361	278881	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC1805.07c	res2	dad2	mcs1|pct1	hos2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-197.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299624	2542007	2542418	278490	278881	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC1805.07c	rad57	dad2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	hos2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-155.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299625	2542032	2542418	278514	278881	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC1805.07c	pnk1	dad2	-	hos2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-113.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299626	2542516	2542418	278974	278881	SPAC2F7.04	SPAC1805.07c	pmc2	dad2	med1	hos2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-111.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299627	2543106	2542418	279538	278881	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC3A11.13	dad2	SPAC3H5.02	hos2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-148.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299628	2543226	2542418	279654	278881	SPAC6B12.05c	SPAC1805.07c	ies2	dad2	-	hos2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-121.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299629	2543237	2542418	279665	278881	SPAC6B12.02c	SPAC1805.07c	mus7	dad2	mms22	hos2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-108.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299630	2543378	2542418	279800	278881	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAC1805.07c	pac10	dad2	-	hos2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-154.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299631	2543529	2542418	279947	278881	SPAC4C5.02c	SPAC1805.07c	ryh1	dad2	hos1|sat7	hos2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-141.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299632	2539366	2542432	275932	278894	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC1805.15c	pef1	pub2	p31	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-133.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299633	2543237	2542432	279665	278894	SPAC6B12.02c	SPAC1805.15c	mus7	pub2	mms22	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-120.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299634	2543529	2542432	279947	278894	SPAC4C5.02c	SPAC1805.15c	ryh1	pub2	hos1|sat7	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-107.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299635	2539726	2542459	276278	278920	SPBC13E7.08c	SPAC1D4.03c	leo1	aut12	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-125.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299636	2541627	2542459	278123	278920	SPAC1F5.08c	SPAC1D4.03c	yam8	aut12	ehs1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-143.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299637	2543529	2542459	279947	278920	SPAC4C5.02c	SPAC1D4.03c	ryh1	aut12	hos1|sat7	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-176.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299638	2539366	2542541	275932	278998	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC1B3.03c	pef1	wis2	p31	cyp5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-136.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299639	2540887	2542541	277404	278998	SPBC4F6.15c	SPAC1B3.03c	swi10	wis2	rad23	cyp5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-165.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299640	2541017	2542592	277532	279047	SPBC36.07	SPAC328.01c	elp1	msn5	iki3	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-249.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299641	2539487	2542619	276050	279073	SPCC895.05	SPAC6G10.02c	for3	tea3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-110.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299642	2538769	2542637	275352	279091	SPCC126.04c	SPAC24H6.03	sgf73	cul3	-	pcu3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-115.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299643	2540128	2542637	276665	279091	SPBC15D4.03	SPAC24H6.03	slm9	cul3	-	pcu3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-173.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299644	2540219	2542637	276752	279091	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC24H6.03	hip1	cul3	hir1	pcu3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-110.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299645	2540220	2542637	276753	279091	SPBC337.03	SPAC24H6.03	rhn1	cul3	SPBC337.03|iss4	pcu3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-108.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299646	2540887	2542637	277404	279091	SPBC4F6.15c	SPAC24H6.03	swi10	cul3	rad23	pcu3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-112.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299647	2540911	2542637	277427	279091	SPBC651.10	SPAC24H6.03	nse5	cul3	-	pcu3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-173.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299648	2540995	2542637	277511	279091	SPBC337.16	SPAC24H6.03	cho1	cul3	-	pcu3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-181.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299649	2539237	2542677	275807	279130	SPCC24B10.13	SPAC26F1.10c	skb5	pyp1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-115.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299650	2539366	2542677	275932	279130	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC26F1.10c	pef1	pyp1	p31	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-138.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299651	2539604	2542677	276162	279130	SPBC1105.14	SPAC26F1.10c	rsv2	pyp1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-155.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299652	2539726	2542677	276278	279130	SPBC13E7.08c	SPAC26F1.10c	leo1	pyp1	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-155.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299653	2540270	2542677	276801	279130	SPBC2G2.02	SPAC26F1.10c	syj1	pyp1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-134.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299654	2540887	2542677	277404	279130	SPBC4F6.15c	SPAC26F1.10c	swi10	pyp1	rad23	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-208.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299655	2541051	2542677	277566	279130	SPBC3E7.08c	SPAC26F1.10c	rad13	pyp1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-160.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299656	2541707	2542677	278202	279130	SPAC29E6.01	SPAC26F1.10c	pof11	pyp1	SPAC30.05|mug156	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-128.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299657	2543289	2542677	279714	279130	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC26F1.10c	rad26	pyp1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-145.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299658	2543324	2542677	279747	279130	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC26F1.10c	vps17	pyp1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-133.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299659	2543436	2542677	279856	279130	SPAC823.05c	SPAC26F1.10c	tlg2	pyp1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-120.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299660	2543468	2542677	279888	279130	SPAC521.02	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC521.02	pyp1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-123.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299661	2539487	2542679	276050	279132	SPCC895.05	SPAC12B10.07	for3	acp1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-156.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299662	2539891	2542679	276437	279132	SPBC1347.08c	SPAC12B10.07	SPBC1347.08c	acp1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-106.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299663	2541961	2542679	278448	279132	SPAC23C4.02	SPAC12B10.07	crn1	acp1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-166.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299664	2543237	2542736	279665	279186	SPAC6B12.02c	SPAC25G10.02	mus7	cce1	mms22	ydc2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-159.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299665	2539366	2542740	275932	279190	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC9G1.06c	pef1	cyk3	p31	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-165.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299666	2539487	2542740	276050	279190	SPCC895.05	SPAC9G1.06c	for3	cyk3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-109.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299667	2543529	2542756	279947	279206	SPAC4C5.02c	SPAC15A10.16	ryh1	bud6	hos1|sat7	SPAC15E1.01|aip3|fat1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-110.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299668	2540337	2542810	276866	279258	SPBC28F2.11	SPAC6F6.02c	hmo1	pof5	SPBC28F2.11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-115.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299669	2538769	2542849	275352	279295	SPCC126.04c	SPAC144.14	sgf73	klp8	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-106.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299670	2539527	2542849	276089	279295	SPCC338.16	SPAC144.14	pof3	klp8	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-119.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299671	2539891	2542849	276437	279295	SPBC1347.08c	SPAC144.14	SPBC1347.08c	klp8	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-117.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299672	2542677	2542849	279130	279295	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC144.14	pyp1	klp8	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-160.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299673	2539366	2542908	275932	279352	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC13G7.03	pef1	upf3	p31	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-117.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299674	2539487	2542908	276050	279352	SPCC895.05	SPAC13G7.03	for3	upf3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-119.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299675	2539604	2542908	276162	279352	SPBC1105.14	SPAC13G7.03	rsv2	upf3	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-130.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299676	2541614	2542908	278111	279352	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC13G7.03	elp3	upf3	kat9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-116.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299677	2538976	2542967	275550	279407	SPCC1840.04	SPAC12B10.12c	pca1	rhp41	-	rhp4a	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-173.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299678	2539087	2542967	275659	279407	SPCC1259.13	SPAC12B10.12c	chk1	rhp41	rad27	rhp4a	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-334.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299679	2539686	2542967	276241	279407	SPBC1734.06	SPAC12B10.12c	rhp18	rhp41	-	rhp4a	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-260.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299680	2540244	2542967	276776	279407	SPBC336.01	SPAC12B10.12c	fbh1	rhp41	fdh|fdh1	rhp4a	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-205.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299681	2540498	2542967	277026	279407	SPBC27.02c	SPAC12B10.12c	ask1	rhp41	mug181	rhp4a	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-103.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299682	2540719	2542967	277242	279407	SPBC216.05	SPAC12B10.12c	rad3	rhp41	-	rhp4a	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-321.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299683	2540887	2542967	277404	279407	SPBC4F6.15c	SPAC12B10.12c	swi10	rhp41	rad23	rhp4a	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-157.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299684	2540992	2542967	277508	279407	SPBC342.05	SPAC12B10.12c	crb2	rhp41	rhp9	rhp4a	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-364.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299685	2540997	2542967	277513	279407	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC12B10.12c	pof9	rhp41	-	rhp4a	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-124.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299686	2541051	2542967	277566	279407	SPBC3E7.08c	SPAC12B10.12c	rad13	rhp41	-	rhp4a	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-140.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299687	2541643	2542967	278139	279407	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC12B10.12c	rad17	rhp41	-	rhp4a	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-366.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299688	2542194	2542967	278669	279407	SPAC17G6.17	SPAC12B10.12c	pof8	rhp41	-	rhp4a	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-118.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299689	2542908	2542967	279352	279407	SPAC13G7.03	SPAC12B10.12c	upf3	rhp41	-	rhp4a	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-107.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299690	2543164	2542967	279595	279407	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC12B10.12c	rad2	rhp41	fen1	rhp4a	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-125.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299691	2543577	2542967	279992	279407	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC12B10.12c	srs2	rhp41	-	rhp4a	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-166.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299692	2539527	2543078	276089	279511	SPCC338.16	SPAC31A2.15c	pof3	dcc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-292.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299693	2539700	2543078	276253	279511	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC31A2.15c	klp6	dcc1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-147.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299694	2539999	2543078	276543	279511	SPBC1734.15	SPAC31A2.15c	rsc4	dcc1	brd1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-113.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299695	2540060	2543078	276598	279511	SPBC106.01	SPAC31A2.15c	mph1	dcc1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-143.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299696	2540320	2543078	276850	279511	SPBC3D6.04c	SPAC31A2.15c	mad1	dcc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-167.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299697	2540911	2543078	277427	279511	SPBC651.10	SPAC31A2.15c	nse5	dcc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-286.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299698	2543118	2543078	279550	279511	SPAC3G6.11	SPAC31A2.15c	chl1	dcc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-350.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299699	2543240	2543078	279668	279511	SPAC694.06c	SPAC31A2.15c	mrc1	dcc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-300.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299700	2543289	2543078	279714	279511	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC31A2.15c	rad26	dcc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-126.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299701	3361323	2543078	280399	279511	SPBC30D10.04	SPAC31A2.15c	swi3	dcc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-238.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299702	2540498	2543106	277026	279538	SPBC27.02c	SPAC3A11.13	ask1	SPAC3A11.13	mug181	SPAC3H5.02	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-115.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299703	2543456	2543106	279876	279538	SPAC3H1.05	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC3H1.05	SPAC3A11.13	-	SPAC3H5.02	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-465.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299704	2539050	2543118	275623	279550	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC3G6.11	rik1	chl1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-147.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299705	2541270	2543118	277784	279550	SPBC902.02c	SPAC3G6.11	ctf18	chl1	chl12	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-450.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299706	2541633	2543118	278129	279550	SPAC664.01c	SPAC3G6.11	swi6	chl1	SPAC824.10c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-108.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299707	2539366	2543159	275932	279590	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC3C7.09	pef1	set8	p31	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-276.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299708	2539891	2543164	276437	279595	SPBC1347.08c	SPAC3G6.06c	SPBC1347.08c	rad2	-	fen1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-115.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299709	2540244	2543164	276776	279595	SPBC336.01	SPAC3G6.06c	fbh1	rad2	fdh|fdh1	fen1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-357.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299710	2540719	2543164	277242	279595	SPBC216.05	SPAC3G6.06c	rad3	rad2	-	fen1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-154.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299711	2540911	2543164	277427	279595	SPBC651.10	SPAC3G6.06c	nse5	rad2	-	fen1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-281.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299712	2540992	2543164	277508	279595	SPBC342.05	SPAC3G6.06c	crb2	rad2	rhp9	fen1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-106.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299713	2543237	2543164	279665	279595	SPAC6B12.02c	SPAC3G6.06c	mus7	rad2	mms22	fen1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-307.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299714	2543289	2543164	279714	279595	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC3G6.06c	rad26	rad2	-	fen1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-264.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299715	2543544	2543164	279961	279595	SPAC664.07c	SPAC3G6.06c	rad9	rad2	-	fen1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-138.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299716	2539891	2543211	276437	279640	SPBC1347.08c	SPAC12B10.15c	SPBC1347.08c	SPAC12B10.15c	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-113.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299717	2540911	2543211	277427	279640	SPBC651.10	SPAC12B10.15c	nse5	SPAC12B10.15c	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-133.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299718	2543237	2543211	279665	279640	SPAC6B12.02c	SPAC12B10.15c	mus7	SPAC12B10.15c	mms22	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-109.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299719	2538976	2543226	275550	279654	SPCC1840.04	SPAC6B12.05c	pca1	ies2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-106.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299720	2539668	2543226	276223	279654	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC6B12.05c	pht1	ies2	pi001	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-133.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299721	2540128	2543226	276665	279654	SPBC15D4.03	SPAC6B12.05c	slm9	ies2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-411.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299722	2540219	2543226	276752	279654	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC6B12.05c	hip1	ies2	hir1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-353.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299723	3361323	2543226	280399	279654	SPBC30D10.04	SPAC6B12.05c	swi3	ies2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-186.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299724	2539142	2543237	275714	279665	SPCC1827.08c	SPAC6B12.02c	pof7	mus7	SPCC70.11c	mms22	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-123.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299725	2539366	2543237	275932	279665	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC6B12.02c	pef1	mus7	p31	mms22	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-238.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299726	2539527	2543237	276089	279665	SPCC338.16	SPAC6B12.02c	pof3	mus7	-	mms22	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-109.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299727	2539891	2543237	276437	279665	SPBC1347.08c	SPAC6B12.02c	SPBC1347.08c	mus7	-	mms22	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-172.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299728	2540337	2543237	276866	279665	SPBC28F2.11	SPAC6B12.02c	hmo1	mus7	SPBC28F2.11	mms22	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-200.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299729	2540352	2543237	276881	279665	SPBC215.03c	SPAC6B12.02c	csn1	mus7	-	mms22	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-188.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299731	2542810	2543237	279258	279665	SPAC6F6.02c	SPAC6B12.02c	pof5	mus7	-	mms22	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-152.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299732	2539050	2543240	275623	279668	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC694.06c	rik1	mrc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-303.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299733	2539215	2543240	275785	279668	SPCC285.16c	SPAC694.06c	msh6	mrc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-119.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299734	2539527	2543240	276089	279668	SPCC338.16	SPAC694.06c	pof3	mrc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-293.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299735	2539689	2543240	276244	279668	SPBC1861.03	SPAC694.06c	mak10	mrc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-146.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299736	2540128	2543240	276665	279668	SPBC15D4.03	SPAC694.06c	slm9	mrc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-107.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299737	2540352	2543240	276881	279668	SPBC215.03c	SPAC694.06c	csn1	mrc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-211.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299738	2540911	2543240	277427	279668	SPBC651.10	SPAC694.06c	nse5	mrc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-325.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299739	2540992	2543240	277508	279668	SPBC342.05	SPAC694.06c	crb2	mrc1	rhp9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-110.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299740	2541270	2543240	277784	279668	SPBC902.02c	SPAC694.06c	ctf18	mrc1	chl12	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-369.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299741	2540383	2543277	276912	279705	SPBC31E1.02c	SPAC1002.03c	pmr1	gls2	cps5|pgak2	gls2alpha	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-155.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299742	2543324	2543277	279747	279705	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC1002.03c	vps17	gls2	-	gls2alpha	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-123.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299743	2543384	2543277	279806	279705	SPAC637.06	SPAC1002.03c	gmh5	gls2	SPAC637.06	gls2alpha	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-336.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299744	2539209	2543289	275779	279714	SPCC23B6.03c	SPAC9E9.08	tel1	rad26	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-119.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299745	2540244	2543289	276776	279714	SPBC336.01	SPAC9E9.08	fbh1	rad26	fdh|fdh1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-155.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299746	2540348	2543289	276877	279714	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC9E9.08	exo1	rad26	mut2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-140.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299747	2540352	2543289	276881	279714	SPBC215.03c	SPAC9E9.08	csn1	rad26	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-359.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299748	2540887	2543289	277404	279714	SPBC4F6.15c	SPAC9E9.08	swi10	rad26	rad23	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-121.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299749	2540911	2543289	277427	279714	SPBC651.10	SPAC9E9.08	nse5	rad26	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-380.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299750	2541120	2543289	277635	279714	SPBC649.03	SPAC9E9.08	rhp14	rad26	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-318.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299751	3361323	2543289	280399	279714	SPBC30D10.04	SPAC9E9.08	swi3	rad26	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-355.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299752	2538769	2543324	275352	279747	SPCC126.04c	SPAPJ696.01c	sgf73	vps17	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-126.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299753	2539487	2543324	276050	279747	SPCC895.05	SPAPJ696.01c	for3	vps17	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-154.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299754	2539726	2543324	276278	279747	SPBC13E7.08c	SPAPJ696.01c	leo1	vps17	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-189.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299755	2540383	2543324	276912	279747	SPBC31E1.02c	SPAPJ696.01c	pmr1	vps17	cps5|pgak2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-320.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299756	2540436	2543324	276964	279747	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAPJ696.01c	ngg1	vps17	ada3|kap1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-178.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299757	2540887	2543324	277404	279747	SPBC4F6.15c	SPAPJ696.01c	swi10	vps17	rad23	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-159.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299758	2540993	2543324	277509	279747	SPBC342.01c	SPAPJ696.01c	alg6	vps17	SPBC3F6.06c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-137.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299759	2539050	2543372	275623	279794	SPCC11E10.08	SPAPB1A10.09	rik1	ase1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-246.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299760	2539667	2543372	276222	279794	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAPB1A10.09	ash2	ase1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-120.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299761	2540060	2543372	276598	279794	SPBC106.01	SPAPB1A10.09	mph1	ase1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-165.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299762	2540694	2543372	277218	279794	SPBC19C7.10	SPAPB1A10.09	bqt4	ase1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-112.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299763	2540911	2543372	277427	279794	SPBC651.10	SPAPB1A10.09	nse5	ase1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-115.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299764	2540498	2543378	277026	279800	SPBC27.02c	SPAC3H8.07c	ask1	pac10	mug181	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-131.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299765	2539237	2543384	275807	279806	SPCC24B10.13	SPAC637.06	skb5	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-111.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299766	2539366	2543384	275932	279806	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC637.06	pef1	gmh5	p31	SPAC637.06	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-121.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299767	2539891	2543384	276437	279806	SPBC1347.08c	SPAC637.06	SPBC1347.08c	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-180.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299768	2539999	2543384	276543	279806	SPBC1734.15	SPAC637.06	rsc4	gmh5	brd1	SPAC637.06	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-208.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299769	2540231	2543384	276763	279806	SPBC336.14c	SPAC637.06	ppk26	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-116.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299770	2540348	2543384	276877	279806	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC637.06	exo1	gmh5	mut2	SPAC637.06	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-149.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299771	2543324	2543384	279747	279806	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC637.06	vps17	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-227.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299772	2543436	2543384	279856	279806	SPAC823.05c	SPAC637.06	tlg2	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-132.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299773	2539366	2543390	275932	279812	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC631.01c	pef1	acp2	p31	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-253.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299774	2541160	2543390	277675	279812	SPBC725.09c	SPAC631.01c	hob3	acp2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-121.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299775	2541160	2543392	277675	279814	SPBC725.09c	SPAC8F11.03	hob3	msh3	-	swi4	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-116.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299776	2539050	2543436	275623	279856	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC823.05c	rik1	tlg2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-107.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299777	2539087	2543436	275659	279856	SPCC1259.13	SPAC823.05c	chk1	tlg2	rad27	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-140.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299778	2539686	2543436	276241	279856	SPBC1734.06	SPAC823.05c	rhp18	tlg2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-217.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299779	2539956	2543436	276500	279856	SPBC16E9.11c	SPAC823.05c	pub3	tlg2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-107.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299780	2539999	2543436	276543	279856	SPBC1734.15	SPAC823.05c	rsc4	tlg2	brd1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-179.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299781	2540348	2543436	276877	279856	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC823.05c	exo1	tlg2	mut2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-113.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299782	2540352	2543436	276881	279856	SPBC215.03c	SPAC823.05c	csn1	tlg2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-121.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299783	2540468	2543436	276996	279856	SPBC23G7.04c	SPAC823.05c	nif1	tlg2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-159.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299784	2540719	2543436	277242	279856	SPBC216.05	SPAC823.05c	rad3	tlg2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-149.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299785	2540887	2543436	277404	279856	SPBC4F6.15c	SPAC823.05c	swi10	tlg2	rad23	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-255.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299786	2540992	2543436	277508	279856	SPBC342.05	SPAC823.05c	crb2	tlg2	rhp9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-214.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299787	2541120	2543436	277635	279856	SPBC649.03	SPAC823.05c	rhp14	tlg2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-103.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299788	2543289	2543436	279714	279856	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC823.05c	rad26	tlg2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-223.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299789	2539366	2543456	275932	279876	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC3H1.05	pef1	SPAC3H1.05	p31	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-123.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299790	2540664	2543456	277189	279876	SPBC215.02	SPAC3H1.05	bob1	SPAC3H1.05	gim5	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-410.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299791	2543378	2543456	279800	279876	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAC3H1.05	pac10	SPAC3H1.05	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-425.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299792	2539667	2543517	276222	279935	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC3G9.05	ash2	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-129.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299793	2540061	2543517	276599	279935	SPBC119.12	SPAC3G9.05	rud3	spa2	SPBC119.12	SPAC3G9.05	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-147.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299794	2540128	2543517	276665	279935	SPBC15D4.03	SPAC3G9.05	slm9	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-135.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299795	2540352	2543517	276881	279935	SPBC215.03c	SPAC3G9.05	csn1	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-127.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299796	2540993	2543517	277509	279935	SPBC342.01c	SPAC3G9.05	alg6	spa2	SPBC3F6.06c	SPAC3G9.05	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-114.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299797	2543384	2543517	279806	279935	SPAC637.06	SPAC3G9.05	gmh5	spa2	SPAC637.06	SPAC3G9.05	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-315.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299798	2538930	2543529	275506	279947	SPCC188.13c	SPAC4C5.02c	dcr1	ryh1	SPCC584.10c	hos1|sat7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-113.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299799	2539487	2543529	276050	279947	SPCC895.05	SPAC4C5.02c	for3	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-174.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299800	2539667	2543529	276222	279947	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC4C5.02c	ash2	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-103.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299801	2539668	2543529	276223	279947	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC4C5.02c	pht1	ryh1	pi001	hos1|sat7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-110.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299802	2539689	2543529	276244	279947	SPBC1861.03	SPAC4C5.02c	mak10	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-107.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299803	2539726	2543529	276278	279947	SPBC13E7.08c	SPAC4C5.02c	leo1	ryh1	SPBC13E7.08c	hos1|sat7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-149.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299804	2540061	2543529	276599	279947	SPBC119.12	SPAC4C5.02c	rud3	ryh1	SPBC119.12	hos1|sat7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-254.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299805	2540314	2543529	276844	279947	SPBC2G5.03	SPAC4C5.02c	ctu1	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-137.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299806	2540337	2543529	276866	279947	SPBC28F2.11	SPAC4C5.02c	hmo1	ryh1	SPBC28F2.11	hos1|sat7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-106.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299807	2540352	2543529	276881	279947	SPBC215.03c	SPAC4C5.02c	csn1	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-183.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299808	2540383	2543529	276912	279947	SPBC31E1.02c	SPAC4C5.02c	pmr1	ryh1	cps5|pgak2	hos1|sat7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-197.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299809	2540498	2543529	277026	279947	SPBC27.02c	SPAC4C5.02c	ask1	ryh1	mug181	hos1|sat7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-188.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299810	2540995	2543529	277511	279947	SPBC337.16	SPAC4C5.02c	cho1	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-165.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299811	2541017	2543529	277532	279947	SPBC36.07	SPAC4C5.02c	elp1	ryh1	iki3	hos1|sat7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-128.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299812	2541160	2543529	277675	279947	SPBC725.09c	SPAC4C5.02c	hob3	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-113.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299813	2541209	2543529	277723	279947	SPBC887.10	SPAC4C5.02c	mcs4	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-132.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299814	2543324	2543529	279747	279947	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC4C5.02c	vps17	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-162.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299815	2540694	2543530	277218	279948	SPBC19C7.10	SPAC926.07c	bqt4	dlc2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-198.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299816	2541378	2543530	277889	279948	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC926.07c	ubp3	dlc2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-210.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299817	2539366	2543544	275932	279961	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC664.07c	pef1	rad9	p31	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-105.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299818	2540352	2543544	276881	279961	SPBC215.03c	SPAC664.07c	csn1	rad9	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-367.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299819	2541120	2543544	277635	279961	SPBC649.03	SPAC664.07c	rhp14	rad9	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-246.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299820	3361323	2543544	280399	279961	SPBC30D10.04	SPAC664.07c	swi3	rad9	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-330.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299821	2540244	2543577	276776	279992	SPBC336.01	SPAC4H3.05	fbh1	srs2	fdh|fdh1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-146.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299822	2540719	2543577	277242	279992	SPBC216.05	SPAC4H3.05	rad3	srs2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-234.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299823	2540911	2543577	277427	279992	SPBC651.10	SPAC4H3.05	nse5	srs2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-309.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299824	2540927	2543577	277443	279992	SPBC365.06	SPAC4H3.05	pmt3	srs2	smt3|ubl2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-116.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299825	2540992	2543577	277508	279992	SPBC342.05	SPAC4H3.05	crb2	srs2	rhp9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-158.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299826	2541120	2543577	277635	279992	SPBC649.03	SPAC4H3.05	rhp14	srs2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-129.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299827	2543237	2543577	279665	279992	SPAC6B12.02c	SPAC4H3.05	mus7	srs2	mms22	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-105.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299828	2543240	2543577	279668	279992	SPAC694.06c	SPAC4H3.05	mrc1	srs2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-426.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299829	2543289	2543577	279714	279992	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC4H3.05	rad26	srs2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-479.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299830	3361323	2543577	280399	279992	SPBC30D10.04	SPAC4H3.05	swi3	srs2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-417.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299831	2538959	3361323	275533	280399	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC30D10.04	cds1	swi3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-421.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299832	2539050	3361323	275623	280399	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC30D10.04	rik1	swi3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-107.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299833	2539087	3361323	275659	280399	SPCC1259.13	SPBC30D10.04	chk1	swi3	rad27	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-342.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299834	2539366	3361323	275932	280399	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC30D10.04	pef1	swi3	p31	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-104.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299835	2540244	3361323	276776	280399	SPBC336.01	SPBC30D10.04	fbh1	swi3	fdh|fdh1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-257.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299836	2540887	3361323	277404	280399	SPBC4F6.15c	SPBC30D10.04	swi10	swi3	rad23	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-170.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299837	2540911	3361323	277427	280399	SPBC651.10	SPBC30D10.04	nse5	swi3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-236.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299838	2540992	3361323	277508	280399	SPBC342.05	SPBC30D10.04	crb2	swi3	rhp9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-347.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299839	2541120	3361323	277635	280399	SPBC649.03	SPBC30D10.04	rhp14	swi3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-131.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299840	2541270	3361323	277784	280399	SPBC902.02c	SPBC30D10.04	ctf18	swi3	chl12	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-335.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299841	2539767	3361342	276318	280418	SPBC1703.06	SPBC16D10.07c	pof10	sir2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-118.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299842	2541120	3361391	277635	280467	SPBC649.03	SPAC13G6.01c	rhp14	rad8	-	SPAC5H10.14c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-209.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299843	2542637	3361391	279091	280467	SPAC24H6.03	SPAC13G6.01c	cul3	rad8	pcu3	SPAC5H10.14c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-105.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299844	2539487	3361561	276050	280637	SPCC895.05	SPAC11E3.01c	for3	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-194.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299845	2539667	3361561	276222	280637	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC11E3.01c	ash2	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-221.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299846	2540498	3361561	277026	280637	SPBC27.02c	SPAC11E3.01c	ask1	swr1	mug181	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-198.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299847	2540911	3361561	277427	280637	SPBC651.10	SPAC11E3.01c	nse5	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-152.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299848	2542418	3361561	278881	280637	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC11E3.01c	dad2	swr1	hos2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-162.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299849	2542541	3361561	278998	280637	SPAC1B3.03c	SPAC11E3.01c	wis2	swr1	cyp5	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-112.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299850	2543577	3361561	279992	280637	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC11E3.01c	srs2	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-194.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299851	2543192	2542542	279621	278999	SPAC343.18	SPAC19A8.10	rfp2	rfp1	-	mug140	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-372.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299852	2542542	2542311	278999	278777	SPAC19A8.10	SPAC16A10.05c	rfp1	dad1	mug140	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-112.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299853	2542542	2541552	278999	278051	SPAC19A8.10	SPAC1142.08	rfp1	fhl1	mug140	SPAC8C9.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-102.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299854	2539366	2542542	275932	278999	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC19A8.10	pef1	rfp1	p31	mug140	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-119.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299855	2540887	2542542	277404	278999	SPBC4F6.15c	SPAC19A8.10	swi10	rfp1	rad23	mug140	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-161.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299856	2539667	2543643	276222	280057	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC3G9.07c	ash2	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-210.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299857	2539668	2543643	276223	280057	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC3G9.07c	pht1	hos2	pi001	hda1|phd1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-273.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299858	2539953	2543643	276497	280057	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC3G9.07c	png2	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-238.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299859	2540128	2543643	276665	280057	SPBC15D4.03	SPAC3G9.07c	slm9	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-103.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299860	2540821	2543643	277339	280057	SPBC800.03	SPAC3G9.07c	clr3	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dixon SJ (2008)	18931302	284812	284812	High Throughput	-103.0	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
299991	3361560	2542683	280636	279136	SPAC14C4.09	SPAPYUG7.03c	agn1	mid2	SPAC14C4.09	-	Co-localization	physical	Martin-Cuadrado AB (2005)	16079182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
299992	3361560	2543516	280636	279934	SPAC14C4.09	SPAC4F10.11	agn1	spn1	SPAC14C4.09	-	Co-localization	physical	Martin-Cuadrado AB (2005)	16079182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
299993	3361560	2542193	280636	278668	SPAC14C4.09	SPAC9G1.11c	agn1	spn4	SPAC14C4.09	-	Co-localization	physical	Martin-Cuadrado AB (2005)	16079182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
299996	2543379	2540127	279801	276664	SPAC821.09	SPBC106.20	eng1	exo70	-	SPBC582.02	Co-localization	physical	Martin-Cuadrado AB (2005)	16079182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
299997	2543379	2539407	279801	275972	SPAC821.09	SPCC970.09	eng1	sec8	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Martin-Cuadrado AB (2005)	16079182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300000	2543097	2540580	279529	277106	SPAC4A8.04	SPBC19C2.05	isp6	ran1	prb1	pat1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nakashima A (2006)	16550352	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis	-	-	BIOGRID
300001	2539920	2539649	276464	276204	SPBC119.08	SPBC12D12.04c	pmk1	pck2	spm1	pkc1|sts6	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Toda T (1996)	8943330	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	hypoosmotic stress resistance	-	-	BIOGRID
300002	2539920	2542293	276464	278761	SPBC119.08	SPAC17G8.14c	pmk1	pck1	spm1	SPAC22H10.01c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Toda T (1996)	8943330	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	hypoosmotic stress resistance:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300003	2541832	2539805	278323	276355	SPAC23E2.02	SPBC146.09c	lsd2	lsd1	saf140|swm2	saf110|swm1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Gordon M (2007)	17371846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300004	2541832	2542236	278323	278708	SPAC23E2.02	SPAC30D11.08c	lsd2	phf2	saf140|swm2	saf60|swp2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Gordon M (2007)	17371846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300005	2541832	2539406	278323	275971	SPAC23E2.02	SPCC4G3.07c	lsd2	phf1	saf140|swm2	saf50|swp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Gordon M (2007)	17371846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300006	2539805	2541832	276355	278323	SPBC146.09c	SPAC23E2.02	lsd1	lsd2	saf110|swm1	saf140|swm2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Gordon M (2007)	17371846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300007	2539805	2542236	276355	278708	SPBC146.09c	SPAC30D11.08c	lsd1	phf2	saf110|swm1	saf60|swp2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Gordon M (2007)	17371846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300008	2539805	2539406	276355	275971	SPBC146.09c	SPCC4G3.07c	lsd1	phf1	saf110|swm1	saf50|swp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Gordon M (2007)	17371846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300011	2539703	2541552	276256	278051	SPBC16G5.15c	SPAC1142.08	fkh2	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Shimada M (2008)	18059475	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating response	-	-	BIOGRID
300012	2539703	2540241	276256	276773	SPBC16G5.15c	SPBC32H8.11	fkh2	mei4	-	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Shimada M (2008)	18059475	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating response	-	-	BIOGRID
300013	2539869	2539703	276415	276256	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC16G5.15c	cdc2	fkh2	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Shimada M (2008)	18059475	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300014	2541849	2540719	278340	277242	SPAC20G8.01	SPBC216.05	cdc17	rad3	SPAC57A10.13c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Jimenez G (1992)	1594599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
300015	2540060	2540589	276598	277115	SPBC106.01	SPBC20F10.06	mph1	mad2	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	He X (1998)	9601094	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle passage through the metaphase-anaphase transition:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	overexpression of mph1|overexpression of mph1 causes a metaphase arrest that can be rescued by deletion of mad2	-	BIOGRID
300017	2540574	3361456	277101	280532	SPBC409.03	SPAC1142.03c	swi5	swi2	-	SPAC17G6.20c	Co-localization	physical	Akamatsu Y (2007)	17304215	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300018	2540574	2540584	277101	277110	SPBC409.03	SPBC28F2.07	swi5	sfr1	-	dds20|mug13	Co-localization	physical	Akamatsu Y (2007)	17304215	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300019	3361456	2540574	280532	277101	SPAC1142.03c	SPBC409.03	swi2	swi5	SPAC17G6.20c	-	Co-localization	physical	Akamatsu Y (2007)	17304215	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300020	3361456	2541633	280532	278129	SPAC1142.03c	SPAC664.01c	swi2	swi6	SPAC17G6.20c	SPAC824.10c	Co-localization	physical	Akamatsu Y (2007)	17304215	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300021	2540584	2540574	277110	277101	SPBC28F2.07	SPBC409.03	sfr1	swi5	dds20|mug13	-	Co-localization	physical	Akamatsu Y (2007)	17304215	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300022	2540911	2539307	277427	275874	SPBC651.10	SPCC970.10c	nse5	brl2	-	rfp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Prudden J (2007)	17762865	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300023	2540911	2541512	277427	278013	SPBC651.10	SPAC11E3.08c	nse5	nse6	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Prudden J (2007)	17762865	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300024	2539307	2540618	275874	277144	SPCC970.10c	SPBC3D6.11c	brl2	slx8	rfp1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Prudden J (2007)	17762865	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300025	2539102	2540618	275674	277144	SPCC1919.15	SPBC3D6.11c	brl1	slx8	SPCC790.01|rfp2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Prudden J (2007)	17762865	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300029	2540618	2540802	277144	277321	SPBC3D6.11c	SPBC1921.02	slx8	rad60	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Prudden J (2007)	17762865	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300030	2540618	2541620	277144	278117	SPBC3D6.11c	SPAC2G11.12	slx8	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Prudden J (2007)	17762865	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300031	2540618	2543670	277144	280084	SPBC3D6.11c	SPAPB1E7.06c	slx8	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Prudden J (2007)	17762865	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300032	2540618	2543580	277144	279995	SPBC3D6.11c	SPAC644.14c	slx8	rad51	-	rhp51	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Prudden J (2007)	17762865	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300033	2540618	2543685	277144	280099	SPBC3D6.11c	SPAC3C7.03c	slx8	rad55	-	rhp55	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Prudden J (2007)	17762865	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300034	2540927	2539102	277443	275674	SPBC365.06	SPCC1919.15	pmt3	brl1	smt3|ubl2	SPCC790.01|rfp2	Two-hybrid	physical	Prudden J (2007)	17762865	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300035	2540927	2539307	277443	275874	SPBC365.06	SPCC970.10c	pmt3	brl2	smt3|ubl2	rfp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Prudden J (2007)	17762865	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300036	2539307	2540927	275874	277443	SPCC970.10c	SPBC365.06	brl2	pmt3	rfp1	smt3|ubl2	Two-hybrid	physical	Prudden J (2007)	17762865	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300037	2540618	6047	277144	111974	SPBC3D6.11c	RES4-26	slx8	RNF4	-	SLX5|SNURF	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Prudden J (2007)	17762865	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300038	2540802	2540618	277321	277144	SPBC1921.02	SPBC3D6.11c	rad60	slx8	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Prudden J (2007)	17762865	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300039	2540618	2540802	277144	277321	SPBC3D6.11c	SPBC1921.02	slx8	rad60	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Prudden J (2007)	17762865	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300041	2541051	2539020	277566	275593	SPBC3E7.08c	SPCC5E4.06	rad13	smc6	-	rad18	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lehmann AR (1995)	8524274	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance	-	-	BIOGRID
300042	2541051	2543580	277566	279995	SPBC3E7.08c	SPAC644.14c	rad13	rad51	-	rhp51	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lehmann AR (1995)	8524274	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance	-	-	BIOGRID
300043	2540853	2540720	277370	277243	SPBC428.16c	SPBC216.07c	rhb1	tor2	-	SPBC646.01c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Urano J (2007)	17360675	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300044	2540853	2540720	277370	277243	SPBC428.16c	SPBC216.07c	rhb1	tor2	-	SPBC646.01c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Urano J (2007)	17360675	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
300046	2541059	2540060	277574	276598	SPBC557.03c	SPBC106.01	pim1	mph1	dcd1|ptr2	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Salus SS (2002)	12446769	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
300047	2540880	2543481	277397	279901	SPBC582.03	SPAPB2B4.03	cdc13	cig2	-	cyc17	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Mondesert O (1996)	8657126	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	-	-	BIOGRID
300228	2541326	2542788	277838	279237	SPBP35G2.03c	SPAC15A10.15	sgo1	sgo2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rabitsch KP (2004)	14972679	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis|sporulation	-	-	BIOGRID
300229	2539087	2541849	275659	278340	SPCC1259.13	SPAC20G8.01	chk1	cdc17	rad27	SPAC57A10.13c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Palermo C (2008)	18183307	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300231	2539007	2542679	275580	279132	SPCC1281.01	SPAC12B10.07	ags1	acp1	SPCC17A7.01|SPCC338.01c|mok1	-	Co-localization	physical	Katayama S (1999)	10087262	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300232	2539007	2539649	275580	276204	SPCC1281.01	SPBC12D12.04c	ags1	pck2	SPCC17A7.01|SPCC338.01c|mok1	pkc1|sts6	Co-localization	physical	Katayama S (1999)	10087262	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300233	2539007	2539649	275580	276204	SPCC1281.01	SPBC12D12.04c	ags1	pck2	SPCC17A7.01|SPCC338.01c|mok1	pkc1|sts6	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Katayama S (1999)	10087262	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300234	2539649	2539007	276204	275580	SPBC12D12.04c	SPCC1281.01	pck2	ags1	pkc1|sts6	SPCC17A7.01|SPCC338.01c|mok1	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Katayama S (1999)	10087262	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300237	2539041	2540381	275614	276910	SPCC18.06c	SPBC25D12.04	caf1	suc22	pop2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Takahashi S (2007)	17264117	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300238	2539123	2541818	275695	278309	SPCC18B5.03	SPAC11G7.02	wee1	pub1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Nefsky B (1996)	8635463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300239	2541818	2542632	278309	279086	SPAC11G7.02	SPAC24H6.05	pub1	cdc25	-	sal2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Nefsky B (1996)	8635463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|temperature sensitive growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300241	2543281	2539404	279708	275969	SPAC23C4.18c	SPCC191.01	rad4	SPCC191.01	cut5|dpb11|dre3	SPCC417.13	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Taricani L (2007)	17272281	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300242	2540024	2539495	276568	276058	SPBP4H10.04	SPCC4F11.02	ppb1	ptc1	SPBC1346.01c	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Takada H (2007)	17881729	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300243	2540024	2542008	276568	278491	SPBP4H10.04	SPAC2G11.07c	ppb1	ptc3	SPBC1346.01c	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Takada H (2007)	17881729	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300244	2540024	2540019	276568	276563	SPBP4H10.04	SPBC1685.01	ppb1	pmp1	SPBC1346.01c	dsp1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Takada H (2007)	17881729	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300245	2539649	2540019	276204	276563	SPBC12D12.04c	SPBC1685.01	pck2	pmp1	pkc1|sts6	dsp1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Takada H (2007)	17881729	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	fitness:wild type	overexpression of bait and prey	-	BIOGRID
300246	2539649	2539495	276204	276058	SPBC12D12.04c	SPCC4F11.02	pck2	ptc1	pkc1|sts6	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Takada H (2007)	17881729	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	fitness:wild type	overexpression of bait and prey	-	BIOGRID
300247	2539649	2542008	276204	278491	SPBC12D12.04c	SPAC2G11.07c	pck2	ptc3	pkc1|sts6	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Takada H (2007)	17881729	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	fitness:wild type	overexpression of bait and prey	-	BIOGRID
300248	2540019	2539920	276563	276464	SPBC1685.01	SPBC119.08	pmp1	pmk1	dsp1	spm1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Takada H (2007)	17881729	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300249	2539495	2542008	276058	278491	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC2G11.07c	ptc1	ptc3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Takada H (2007)	17881729	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
300250	2539920	2540329	276464	276859	SPBC119.08	SPBC29B5.01	pmk1	atf1	spm1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Biochemical Activity	physical	Takada H (2007)	17881729	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300251	2539572	2539572	276132	276132	SPCC576.03c	SPCC576.03c	tpx1	tpx1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Jara M (2007)	17409354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300252	2539442	2542083	276005	278560	SPCC5E4.04	SPAC27E2.05	cut1	cdc1	ptr4	mis1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Hirano T (1986)	16453724	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300253	2539442	2539869	276005	276415	SPCC5E4.04	SPBC11B10.09	cut1	cdc2	ptr4	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Hirano T (1986)	16453724	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300254	2539442	2540255	276005	276786	SPCC5E4.04	SPBC336.04	cut1	cdc6	ptr4	mis10|pol3|pold	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Hirano T (1986)	16453724	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300255	2539442	2542632	276005	279086	SPCC5E4.04	SPAC24H6.05	cut1	cdc25	ptr4	sal2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Hirano T (1986)	16453724	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300256	2539505	2542358	276068	278823	SPCC736.14	SPAC1782.09c	dis1	clp1	-	flp1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Trautmann S (2005)	16085490	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300257	2541059	2543382	277574	279804	SPBC557.03c	SPAC890.02c	pim1	alp7	dcd1|ptr2	mia1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sato M (2007)	17476213	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300258	2542285	2543027	278753	279463	SPAC17H9.09c	SPAC110.03	ras1	cdc42	ste5	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Chung KS (1998)	9524252	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300259	2542285	3361514	278753	280590	SPAC17H9.09c	SPAC110.04c	ras1	pss1	ste5	SPAP14E8.01c|ssp1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Chung KS (1998)	9524252	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300265	2542474	2542140	278934	278616	SPAC31G5.09c	SPAC1783.07c	spk1	pap1	-	caf3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Toda T (1991)	1899230	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:partial rescue	expression of pap1 partially rescues sensitivity to Staurosporine (Chebi: 15738)	-	BIOGRID
300266	2541710	2542622	278205	279076	SPAC343.11c	SPAC18B11.07c	msc1	rhp6	-	sng1|ubc2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dul BE (2007)	17456468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300267	2542622	2541710	279076	278205	SPAC18B11.07c	SPAC343.11c	rhp6	msc1	sng1|ubc2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dul BE (2007)	17456468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300268	2539087	2541710	275659	278205	SPCC1259.13	SPAC343.11c	chk1	msc1	rad27	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Dul BE (2007)	17456468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance:wild type|resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300269	2542622	2541710	279076	278205	SPAC18B11.07c	SPAC343.11c	rhp6	msc1	sng1|ubc2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Dul BE (2007)	17456468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance:wild type|resistance to chemicals:wild type|temperature sensitive growth:wild type|viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300270	2543239	2542255	279667	278725	SPAC977.10	SPAC57A7.08	sod2	pzh1	-	phz1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Balcells L (1997)	9428701	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300272	2540633	2542622	277159	279076	SPBC21D10.12	SPAC18B11.07c	hob1	rhp6	-	sng1|ubc2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ramalingam A (2007)	17611416	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300273	2540933	2542898	277449	279342	SPBC36.06c	SPAC6F12.13c	spo9	fps1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ye Y (2007)	17596513	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300274	2540933	853272	277449	33592	SPBC36.06c	YJL167W	spo9	ERG20	-	BOT3|FDS1|FPP1|bifunctional (2E,6E)-farnesyl diphosphate synthase/dimethylallyltranstransferase|L000000579	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ye Y (2007)	17596513	284812	559292	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300275	2540933	856036	277449	36110	SPBC36.06c	YPL069C	spo9	BTS1	-	farnesyltranstransferase|L000003062	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ye Y (2007)	17596513	284812	559292	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300276	856036	2540933	36110	277449	YPL069C	SPBC36.06c	BTS1	spo9	farnesyltranstransferase|L000003062	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ye Y (2007)	17596513	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300277	856036	2542898	36110	279342	YPL069C	SPAC6F12.13c	BTS1	fps1	farnesyltranstransferase|L000003062	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ye Y (2007)	17596513	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300279	2542898	2540933	279342	277449	SPAC6F12.13c	SPBC36.06c	fps1	spo9	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Ye Y (2007)	17596513	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300280	2540933	2540933	277449	277449	SPBC36.06c	SPBC36.06c	spo9	spo9	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Ye Y (2007)	17596513	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300281	2540933	2542898	277449	279342	SPBC36.06c	SPAC6F12.13c	spo9	fps1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Ye Y (2007)	17596513	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300282	2542898	2542898	279342	279342	SPAC6F12.13c	SPAC6F12.13c	fps1	fps1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Ye Y (2007)	17596513	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300283	2542898	2540933	279342	277449	SPAC6F12.13c	SPBC36.06c	fps1	spo9	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ye Y (2007)	17596513	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300284	2540763	2540933	277283	277449	SPBC405.04c	SPBC36.06c	ypt7	spo9	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Ye Y (2007)	17596513	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300285	2541154	2543342	277669	279765	SPBC3E7.01	SPAC521.04c	fab1	sst1	SPBC6B1.11c|ste12	SPAC521.04c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Onishi M (2003)	12951513	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating response:wild type|vacuolar morphology:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300286	2541154	2542606	277669	279060	SPBC3E7.01	SPAC19B12.10	fab1	sst2	SPBC6B1.11c|ste12	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Onishi M (2003)	12951513	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating response:wild type|vacuolar morphology:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300287	2541154	2541341	277669	277852	SPBC3E7.01	SPBP35G2.05c	fab1	cki2	SPBC6B1.11c|ste12	sst3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Onishi M (2003)	12951513	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating response:wild type|vacuolar morphology:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300288	2541154	2542403	277669	278867	SPBC3E7.01	SPAC19A8.05c	fab1	sst4	SPBC6B1.11c|ste12	vps27	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Onishi M (2003)	12951513	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating response:wild type|vacuolar morphology:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300289	2541154	2542925	277669	279366	SPBC3E7.01	SPAC11E3.04c	fab1	ubc13	SPBC6B1.11c|ste12	spu13|sst5	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Onishi M (2003)	12951513	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating response:wild type|vacuolar morphology:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300290	2541154	3361461	277669	280537	SPBC3E7.01	SPAC11H11.01	fab1	sst6	SPBC6B1.11c|ste12	cps23	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Onishi M (2003)	12951513	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating response:wild type|vacuolar morphology:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300300	2540580	2540654	277106	277179	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC19F5.01c	ran1	puc1	pat1	SPBP8B7.32c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Forsburg SL (1994)	8006074	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|meiosis:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300302	2539805	2541832	276355	278323	SPBC146.09c	SPAC23E2.02	lsd1	lsd2	saf110|swm1	saf140|swm2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lan F (2007)	17434129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300303	2539805	2539406	276355	275971	SPBC146.09c	SPCC4G3.07c	lsd1	phf1	saf110|swm1	saf50|swp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lan F (2007)	17434129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300304	2539805	2542236	276355	278708	SPBC146.09c	SPAC30D11.08c	lsd1	phf2	saf110|swm1	saf60|swp2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lan F (2007)	17434129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300305	2541832	2539805	278323	276355	SPAC23E2.02	SPBC146.09c	lsd2	lsd1	saf140|swm2	saf110|swm1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lan F (2007)	17434129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300306	2541832	2539406	278323	275971	SPAC23E2.02	SPCC4G3.07c	lsd2	phf1	saf140|swm2	saf50|swp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lan F (2007)	17434129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300307	2541832	2542236	278323	278708	SPAC23E2.02	SPAC30D11.08c	lsd2	phf2	saf140|swm2	saf60|swp2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lan F (2007)	17434129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300312	2540633	2539090	277159	275662	SPBC21D10.12	SPCC126.02c	hob1	pku70	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ramalingam A (2007)	17671430	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
300313	2540633	2541045	277159	277560	SPBC21D10.12	SPBC543.03c	hob1	pku80	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ramalingam A (2007)	17671430	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
300315	2540880	2539869	277397	276415	SPBC582.03	SPBC11B10.09	cdc13	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Booher R (1988)	2847913	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300316	2541339	2540606	277850	277132	SPBP4G3.02	SPBC428.03c	pho1	pho4	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Maundrell K (1985)	4092931	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular processes:wild type	not determined	-	BIOGRID
300317	2541581	2541388	278078	277899	SPAC1486.10	SPBP8B7.30c	thi1	thi5	SPAC6G10.01|ntf1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	McQuire TA (2006)	16874521	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	auxotrophy:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300318	2542664	2539012	279117	275585	SPAC1071.10c	SPCC1020.01c	pma1	pma2	-	SPCC1393.01	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ghislain M (1991)	1833395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300319	2539007	2540243	275580	276775	SPCC1281.01	SPBC32H8.13c	ags1	mok12	SPCC17A7.01|SPCC338.01c|mok1	SPACTOKYO_453.25c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Garcia I (2006)	16420355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300320	2539007	2540007	275580	276551	SPCC1281.01	SPBC16D10.05	ags1	mok13	SPCC17A7.01|SPCC338.01c|mok1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Garcia I (2006)	16420355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300321	2541059	2538758	277574	275341	SPBC557.03c	SPCC1739.12	pim1	ppe1	dcd1|ptr2	esp1|ppx1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Matsumoto T (1993)	8387358	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
300322	2541059	2540149	277574	276686	SPBC557.03c	SPBC1289.03c	pim1	spi1	dcd1|ptr2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Matsumoto T (1993)	8387358	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300323	2541022	2539580	277537	276139	SPBC3F6.05	SPCC645.07	rga1	rgf1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Garcia P (2006)	16421249	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300324	2539580	2541612	276139	278109	SPCC645.07	SPAC1F7.04	rgf1	rho1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Garcia P (2006)	16421249	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300325	2541612	2539580	278109	276139	SPAC1F7.04	SPCC645.07	rho1	rgf1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Garcia P (2006)	16421249	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300326	2539580	2538822	276139	275403	SPCC645.07	SPCC1840.02c	rgf1	bgs4	-	cwg1|orb11|pbr1|sph1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Garcia P (2006)	16421249	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300327	2539580	2542293	276139	278761	SPCC645.07	SPAC17G8.14c	rgf1	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Garcia P (2006)	16421249	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300329	2540623	2539377	277149	275943	SPBC26H8.02c	SPCC825.03c	sec9	psy1	-	sso1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nakamura T (2005)	16272747	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300330	2538875	2540250	275454	276782	SPCC962.02c	SPBC336.15	bir1	pic1	SPCP31B10.10c|cut17|pbh1	SPBC685.01	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Huang HK (2005)	16199877	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300331	2538875	2541194	275454	277708	SPCC962.02c	SPBC725.13c	bir1	psf2	SPCP31B10.10c|cut17|pbh1	bsh3|dre13	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Huang HK (2005)	16199877	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300332	2538875	2541194	275454	277708	SPCC962.02c	SPBC725.13c	bir1	psf2	SPCP31B10.10c|cut17|pbh1	bsh3|dre13	Co-localization	physical	Huang HK (2005)	16199877	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300448	2540695	2543164	277219	279595	SPBC19G7.01c	SPAC3G6.06c	msh2	rad2	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	fen1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Marti TM (2003)	12713814	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency	-	-	BIOGRID
300449	2539949	2543164	276493	279595	SPBC1703.04	SPAC3G6.06c	mlh1	rad2	-	fen1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Marti TM (2003)	12713814	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency	-	-	BIOGRID
300450	2542582	2543164	279037	279595	SPAC19G12.02c	SPAC3G6.06c	pms1	rad2	-	fen1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Marti TM (2003)	12713814	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency	-	-	BIOGRID
300451	2540348	2540695	276877	277219	SPBC29A10.05	SPBC19G7.01c	exo1	msh2	mut2	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Marti TM (2003)	12713814	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency	-	-	BIOGRID
300452	2540348	2539949	276877	276493	SPBC29A10.05	SPBC1703.04	exo1	mlh1	mut2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Marti TM (2003)	12713814	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency	-	-	BIOGRID
300453	2539658	2541710	276213	278205	SPBC1105.17	SPAC343.11c	cnp1	msc1	sim2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ahmed S (2007)	17947424	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300454	2540494	2541710	277022	278205	SPBC409.04c	SPAC343.11c	mis12	msc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ahmed S (2007)	17947424	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300455	2540494	2539668	277022	276223	SPBC409.04c	SPBC11B10.10c	mis12	pht1	-	pi001	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ahmed S (2007)	17947424	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300456	2542304	2541710	278771	278205	SPAC1687.20c	SPAC343.11c	mis6	msc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ahmed S (2007)	17947424	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300457	2542304	2539668	278771	276223	SPAC1687.20c	SPBC11B10.10c	mis6	pht1	-	pi001	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ahmed S (2007)	17947424	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300458	2541620	2541051	278117	277566	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC3E7.08c	rqh1	rad13	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Freyer GA (1995)	7623848	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance	-	-	BIOGRID
300459	2543164	2541620	279595	278117	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC2G11.12	rad2	rqh1	fen1	hus2|rad12|rec9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Freyer GA (1995)	7623848	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance	-	-	BIOGRID
300460	2540977	2542542	277493	278999	SPBC3E7.02c	SPAC19A8.10	hsp16	rfp1	-	mug140	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2001)	11452028	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300461	2540977	2540977	277493	277493	SPBC3E7.02c	SPBC3E7.02c	hsp16	hsp16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2001)	11452028	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300462	2540977	2539477	277493	276040	SPBC3E7.02c	SPCP31B10.06	hsp16	mug190	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2001)	11452028	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300463	2540977	3361483	277493	280559	SPBC3E7.02c	SPAC513.01c	hsp16	eft201	-	SPAPYUK71.04c|eft2-1|etf2|eft2	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2001)	11452028	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300464	2540977	2540927	277493	277443	SPBC3E7.02c	SPBC365.06	hsp16	pmt3	-	smt3|ubl2	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2001)	11452028	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300465	2540977	2543402	277493	279824	SPBC3E7.02c	SPAC630.14c	hsp16	tup12	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2001)	11452028	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300466	2540977	2539686	277493	276241	SPBC3E7.02c	SPBC1734.06	hsp16	rhp18	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2001)	11452028	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300467	2540977	2539295	277493	275863	SPBC3E7.02c	SPCC417.08	hsp16	tef3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2001)	11452028	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300468	2540977	2540145	277493	276682	SPBC3E7.02c	SPBC1289.15	hsp16	pfl5	-	SPBC1289.15|SPBC8E4.07c	Two-hybrid	physical	Taricani L (2001)	11452028	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300469	2542237	2540541	278709	277068	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC1A4.03c	fin1	top2	-	ptr11	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Krien MJ (1998)	9490640	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300470	2540541	2542237	277068	278709	SPBC1A4.03c	SPAC19E9.02	top2	fin1	ptr11	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Krien MJ (1998)	9490640	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	-	-	BIOGRID
300471	2541059	2542237	277574	278709	SPBC557.03c	SPAC19E9.02	pim1	fin1	dcd1|ptr2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Krien MJ (1998)	9490640	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	-	-	BIOGRID
300472	2541059	2542237	277574	278709	SPBC557.03c	SPAC19E9.02	pim1	fin1	dcd1|ptr2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Krien MJ (1998)	9490640	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300473	2540761	2539504	277281	276067	SPBC21.04	SPCP31B10.03c	med8	med31	sep15	sep10|soh1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Miklos I (2008)	17922236	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300474	2538875	2542788	275454	279237	SPCC962.02c	SPAC15A10.15	bir1	sgo2	SPCP31B10.10c|cut17|pbh1	-	Co-localization	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2007)	17301288	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300475	3361036	2542788	280112	279237	SPCC320.13c	SPAC15A10.15	ark1	sgo2	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	-	Co-localization	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2007)	17301288	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300476	2542788	2538875	279237	275454	SPAC15A10.15	SPCC962.02c	sgo2	bir1	-	SPCP31B10.10c|cut17|pbh1	Co-localization	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2007)	17301288	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300477	2540250	3361036	276782	280112	SPBC336.15	SPCC320.13c	pic1	ark1	SPBC685.01	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2007)	17301288	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300478	2538875	3361036	275454	280112	SPCC962.02c	SPCC320.13c	bir1	ark1	SPCP31B10.10c|cut17|pbh1	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2007)	17301288	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300479	2540250	2538875	276782	275454	SPBC336.15	SPCC962.02c	pic1	bir1	SPBC685.01	SPCP31B10.10c|cut17|pbh1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2007)	17301288	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300480	2540361	2540589	276890	277115	SPBC2F12.13	SPBC20F10.06	klp5	mad2	sot1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Garcia MA (2002)	12426374	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	-	-	BIOGRID
300481	2539497	2539505	276060	276068	SPCC895.07	SPCC736.14	alp14	dis1	mtc1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Garcia MA (2002)	12426374	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300482	2539497	2540361	276060	276890	SPCC895.07	SPBC2F12.13	alp14	klp5	mtc1	sot1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Garcia MA (2002)	12426374	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300483	2539497	2539700	276060	276253	SPCC895.07	SPBC1685.15c	alp14	klp6	mtc1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Garcia MA (2002)	12426374	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300484	2540361	2539505	276890	276068	SPBC2F12.13	SPCC736.14	klp5	dis1	sot1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Garcia MA (2002)	12426374	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300485	2539700	2539505	276253	276068	SPBC1685.15c	SPCC736.14	klp6	dis1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Garcia MA (2002)	12426374	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300486	2540361	2539497	276890	276060	SPBC2F12.13	SPCC895.07	klp5	alp14	sot1	mtc1	Co-localization	physical	Garcia MA (2002)	12426374	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300487	2543643	2542304	280057	278771	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC1687.20c	hos2	mis6	hda1|phd1	-	Co-localization	physical	Kobayashi Y (2007)	17352737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	ChIP	-	BIOGRID
300488	2543643	2542004	280057	278487	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC27F1.04c	hos2	nuf2	hda1|phd1	-	Co-localization	physical	Kobayashi Y (2007)	17352737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	ChIP	-	BIOGRID
300489	2541667	2543643	278163	280057	SPAC29E6.04	SPAC3G9.07c	nnf1	hos2	SPAC30.08	hda1|phd1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kobayashi Y (2007)	17352737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
300490	2542304	2543643	278771	280057	SPAC1687.20c	SPAC3G9.07c	mis6	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kobayashi Y (2007)	17352737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
300491	2540494	2543643	277022	280057	SPBC409.04c	SPAC3G9.07c	mis12	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kobayashi Y (2007)	17352737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
300492	2541047	2543643	277562	280057	SPBC409.09c	SPAC3G9.07c	mis13	hos2	cnl1	hda1|phd1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kobayashi Y (2007)	17352737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
300493	2543482	2543643	279902	280057	SPAC688.02c	SPAC3G9.07c	mis14	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kobayashi Y (2007)	17352737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
300494	3361327	2543643	280403	280057	SPBC21.01	SPAC3G9.07c	mis17	hos2	SPBC776.19	hda1|phd1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kobayashi Y (2007)	17352737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
300495	2538763	2543643	275346	280057	SPCC970.12	SPAC3G9.07c	mis18	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kobayashi Y (2007)	17352737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
300496	2542004	2543643	278487	280057	SPAC27F1.04c	SPAC3G9.07c	nuf2	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kobayashi Y (2007)	17352737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
300497	2539658	2543643	276213	280057	SPBC1105.17	SPAC3G9.07c	cnp1	hos2	sim2	hda1|phd1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kobayashi Y (2007)	17352737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300498	2542196	2539123	278671	275695	SPAC30D11.13	SPCC18B5.03	hus5	wee1	ubc9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	al-Khodairy F (1995)	7768995	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300499	2542196	2541695	278671	278191	SPAC30D11.13	SPAC1F7.05	hus5	cdc22	ubc9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	al-Khodairy F (1995)	7768995	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300500	2542196	2539087	278671	275659	SPAC30D11.13	SPCC1259.13	hus5	chk1	ubc9	rad27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	al-Khodairy F (1995)	7768995	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance	-	-	BIOGRID
300501	2539087	2542029	275659	278511	SPCC1259.13	SPAC8E11.02c	chk1	rad24	rad27	anr5|sam4	Two-hybrid	physical	Kosoy A (2007)	17502373	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300502	2539087	2539402	275659	275967	SPCC1259.13	SPCC613.03	chk1	SPCC613.03	rad27	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Kosoy A (2007)	17502373	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300503	2539087	2538689	275659	275274	SPCC1259.13	SPCC1795.11	chk1	sum3	rad27	ded1|moc2|slh3	Two-hybrid	physical	Kosoy A (2007)	17502373	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300504	2539087	2539208	275659	275778	SPCC1259.13	SPCC1450.11c	chk1	cek1	rad27	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Kosoy A (2007)	17502373	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300505	2539087	2542503	275659	278961	SPCC1259.13	SPAC19A8.12	chk1	dcp2	rad27	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Kosoy A (2007)	17502373	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300506	2539087	2542542	275659	278999	SPCC1259.13	SPAC19A8.10	chk1	rfp1	rad27	mug140	Two-hybrid	physical	Kosoy A (2007)	17502373	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300507	2539087	2542542	275659	278999	SPCC1259.13	SPAC19A8.10	chk1	rfp1	rad27	mug140	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kosoy A (2007)	17502373	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300508	2542542	2539102	278999	275674	SPAC19A8.10	SPCC1919.15	rfp1	brl1	mug140	SPCC790.01|rfp2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kosoy A (2007)	17502373	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300517	2541633	3361036	278129	280112	SPAC664.01c	SPCC320.13c	swi6	ark1	SPAC824.10c	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kawashima SA (2007)	17322402	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300518	2541633	2538875	278129	275454	SPAC664.01c	SPCC962.02c	swi6	bir1	SPAC824.10c	SPCP31B10.10c|cut17|pbh1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kawashima SA (2007)	17322402	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300519	2541633	2540250	278129	276782	SPAC664.01c	SPBC336.15	swi6	pic1	SPAC824.10c	SPBC685.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kawashima SA (2007)	17322402	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300520	3361036	2542788	280112	279237	SPCC320.13c	SPAC15A10.15	ark1	sgo2	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	-	Co-localization	physical	Kawashima SA (2007)	17322402	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300521	2538875	3361036	275454	280112	SPCC962.02c	SPCC320.13c	bir1	ark1	SPCP31B10.10c|cut17|pbh1	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kawashima SA (2007)	17322402	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300522	2538875	2542788	275454	279237	SPCC962.02c	SPAC15A10.15	bir1	sgo2	SPCP31B10.10c|cut17|pbh1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kawashima SA (2007)	17322402	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300523	2542788	2538875	279237	275454	SPAC15A10.15	SPCC962.02c	sgo2	bir1	-	SPCP31B10.10c|cut17|pbh1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kawashima SA (2007)	17322402	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300527	2543237	2543086	279665	279519	SPAC6B12.02c	SPAC30D11.10	mus7	rad52	mms22	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Dovey CL (2007)	17660542	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300528	2543237	2543580	279665	279995	SPAC6B12.02c	SPAC644.14c	mus7	rad51	mms22	rhp51	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Dovey CL (2007)	17660542	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300529	2543237	2542749	279665	279199	SPAC6B12.02c	SPAC15A10.03c	mus7	rad54	mms22	rhp54	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Dovey CL (2007)	17660542	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300530	2543237	2542007	279665	278490	SPAC6B12.02c	SPAC20H4.07	mus7	rad57	mms22	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Dovey CL (2007)	17660542	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance|resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
300531	2543237	2541620	279665	278117	SPAC6B12.02c	SPAC2G11.12	mus7	rqh1	mms22	hus2|rad12|rec9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Dovey CL (2007)	17660542	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance|resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
300534	2539838	2543237	276387	279665	SPBC1347.10	SPAC6B12.02c	cdc23	mus7	mcm10	mms22	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dovey CL (2007)	17660542	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300536	2543237	2540255	279665	276786	SPAC6B12.02c	SPBC336.04	mus7	cdc6	mms22	mis10|pol3|pold	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dovey CL (2007)	17660542	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300540	2543086	2541657	279519	278153	SPAC30D11.10	SPAP27G11.15	rad52	slx1	rad22|rad22A	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Coulon S (2006)	16467377	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
300541	2543086	2543478	279519	279898	SPAC30D11.10	SPAC688.06c	rad52	slx4	rad22|rad22A	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Coulon S (2006)	16467377	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
300542	2540589	2540582	277115	277108	SPBC20F10.06	SPBC26H8.07c	mad2	nda3	-	alp12|ben1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	He X (1997)	9223296	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300543	2541592	2540589	278089	277115	SPAC6F12.15c	SPBC20F10.06	cut9	mad2	dre1	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	He X (1997)	9223296	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300544	2542438	2540589	278900	277115	SPAC17C9.01c	SPBC20F10.06	nuc2	mad2	SPAC1851.01|apc3	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	He X (1997)	9223296	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300545	2540398	2540589	276926	277115	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC20F10.06	dis3	mad2	rrp44	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Murakami H (2007)	17380189	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	-	-	BIOGRID
300546	2540398	2541633	276926	278129	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC664.01c	dis3	swi6	rrp44	SPAC824.10c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Murakami H (2007)	17380189	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300547	2540398	2538930	276926	275506	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC188.13c	dis3	dcr1	rrp44	SPCC584.10c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Murakami H (2007)	17380189	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300548	2540492	2540601	277020	277127	SPBC2D10.13	SPBC29A3.14c	est1	trt1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Beernink HT (2003)	12676088	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300549	2540601	2540492	277127	277020	SPBC29A3.14c	SPBC2D10.13	trt1	est1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Beernink HT (2003)	12676088	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300550	2540601	2542313	277127	278779	SPBC29A3.14c	SPAC16A10.07c	trt1	taz1	-	myb|myb1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Beernink HT (2003)	12676088	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300551	2540383	2542283	276912	278751	SPBC31E1.02c	SPAC27F1.08	pmr1	pdt1	cps5|pgak2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Maeda T (2004)	14723709	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
300552	2540383	2542283	276912	278751	SPBC31E1.02c	SPAC27F1.08	pmr1	pdt1	cps5|pgak2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Maeda T (2004)	14723709	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
300553	2540060	2540223	276598	276756	SPBC106.01	SPBC32F12.04	mph1	gtb1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	tug1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tange Y (2007)	17277378	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300554	2538736	2540223	275320	276756	SPCC1322.12c	SPBC32F12.04	bub1	gtb1	-	tug1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2007)	17277378	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300555	2539219	2540223	275789	276756	SPCC1795.01c	SPBC32F12.04	mad3	gtb1	SPCC895.02	tug1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2007)	17277378	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300556	2540589	2540223	277115	276756	SPBC20F10.06	SPBC32F12.04	mad2	gtb1	-	tug1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2007)	17277378	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300557	2540718	2541929	277241	278417	SPBC3H7.15	SPAC23C4.12	hhp1	hhp2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Dhillon N (1994)	8026462	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular processes	-	-	BIOGRID
300558	2542313	2541158	278779	277673	SPAC16A10.07c	SPBC660.13c	taz1	ssb1	myb|myb1	rad11|rpa1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kibe T (2007)	17429064	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	-	-	BIOGRID
300559	2541620	2541158	278117	277673	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC660.13c	rqh1	ssb1	hus2|rad12|rec9	rad11|rpa1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kibe T (2007)	17429064	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300560	2539155	2540060	275727	276598	SPCC1020.02	SPBC106.01	spc7	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kerres A (2007)	17442892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300561	2539155	2540589	275727	277115	SPCC1020.02	SPBC20F10.06	spc7	mad2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kerres A (2007)	17442892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300562	2539155	2542304	275727	278771	SPCC1020.02	SPAC1687.20c	spc7	mis6	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kerres A (2007)	17442892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300563	2539155	2540804	275727	277323	SPCC1020.02	SPBC18E5.03c	spc7	sim4	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kerres A (2007)	17442892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300564	2539155	3361327	275727	280403	SPCC1020.02	SPBC21.01	spc7	mis17	-	SPBC776.19	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kerres A (2007)	17442892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300565	2539155	2542737	275727	279187	SPCC1020.02	SPAC25B8.14	spc7	mal2	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kerres A (2007)	17442892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
300566	2539155	2540936	275727	277452	SPCC1020.02	SPBC800.05c	spc7	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kerres A (2007)	17442892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300567	2540936	2539155	277452	275727	SPBC800.05c	SPCC1020.02	atb2	spc7	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kerres A (2007)	17442892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300568	2539155	2543399	275727	279821	SPCC1020.02	SPAC3G9.12	spc7	peg1	-	cls1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kerres A (2007)	17442892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300569	2539155	2539497	275727	276060	SPCC1020.02	SPCC895.07	spc7	alp14	-	mtc1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kerres A (2007)	17442892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300572	2542237	2541059	278709	277574	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC557.03c	fin1	pim1	-	dcd1|ptr2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Krien MJ (2002)	11927555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
300573	2542237	2538736	278709	275320	SPAC19E9.02	SPCC1322.12c	fin1	bub1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Krien MJ (2002)	11927555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300687	2542542	2540927	278999	277443	SPAC19A8.10	SPBC365.06	rfp1	pmt3	mug140	smt3|ubl2	Two-hybrid	physical	Sun H (2007)	17762864	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300688	2542542	2540927	278999	277443	SPAC19A8.10	SPBC365.06	rfp1	pmt3	mug140	smt3|ubl2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Sun H (2007)	17762864	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300689	2542542	2543192	278999	279621	SPAC19A8.10	SPAC343.18	rfp1	rfp2	mug140	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sun H (2007)	17762864	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300690	2542542	2543192	278999	279621	SPAC19A8.10	SPAC343.18	rfp1	rfp2	mug140	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sun H (2007)	17762864	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	-	-	BIOGRID
300691	2539020	2541071	275593	277586	SPCC5E4.06	SPBC582.05c	smc6	brc1	rad18	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Lee KM (2007)	17277362	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
300692	2539020	2540679	275593	277204	SPCC5E4.06	SPBC3D6.10	smc6	apn2	rad18	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Lee KM (2007)	17277362	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300693	2541071	2543565	277586	279981	SPBC582.05c	SPAPB24D3.04c	brc1	mag1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Lee KM (2007)	17277362	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
300694	2540679	2541071	277204	277586	SPBC3D6.10	SPBC582.05c	apn2	brc1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lee KM (2007)	17277362	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
300695	2541071	2543164	277586	279595	SPBC582.05c	SPAC3G6.06c	brc1	rad2	-	fen1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lee KM (2007)	17277362	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
300696	2539020	2540887	275593	277404	SPCC5E4.06	SPBC4F6.15c	smc6	swi10	rad18	rad23	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Lee KM (2007)	17277362	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300697	2539020	2542967	275593	279407	SPCC5E4.06	SPAC12B10.12c	smc6	rhp41	rad18	rhp4a	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Lee KM (2007)	17277362	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300698	2539020	2541120	275593	277635	SPCC5E4.06	SPBC649.03	smc6	rhp14	rad18	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Lee KM (2007)	17277362	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300717	2541612	2539580	278109	276139	SPAC1F7.04	SPCC645.07	rho1	rgf1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Iwaki N (2003)	14637153	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300718	2542013	2539580	278496	276139	SPAC20H4.11c	SPCC645.07	rho5	rgf1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Iwaki N (2003)	14637153	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300719	2543027	2539580	279463	276139	SPAC110.03	SPCC645.07	cdc42	rgf1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Iwaki N (2003)	14637153	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300720	2541612	2542337	278109	278803	SPAC1F7.04	SPAC16E8.09	rho1	scd1	-	ral1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Iwaki N (2003)	14637153	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300721	2542773	2542337	279222	278803	SPAC16.01	SPAC16E8.09	rho2	scd1	-	ral1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Iwaki N (2003)	14637153	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300722	3361511	2542337	280587	278803	SPAC23C4.08	SPAC16E8.09	rho3	scd1	-	ral1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Iwaki N (2003)	14637153	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300723	3361476	2542337	280552	278803	SPAC16A10.04	SPAC16E8.09	rho4	scd1	-	ral1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Iwaki N (2003)	14637153	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300724	2542013	2542337	278496	278803	SPAC20H4.11c	SPAC16E8.09	rho5	scd1	-	ral1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Iwaki N (2003)	14637153	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300725	2543027	2542337	279463	278803	SPAC110.03	SPAC16E8.09	cdc42	scd1	-	ral1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Iwaki N (2003)	14637153	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300726	2540255	2541746	276786	278240	SPBC336.04	SPAC20G4.04c	cdc6	hus1	mis10|pol3|pold	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Francesconi S (1997)	9135148	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300727	2540255	2542558	276786	279014	SPBC336.04	SPAC1952.07	cdc6	rad1	mis10|pol3|pold	rad19	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Francesconi S (1997)	9135148	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300728	2540255	2539087	276786	275659	SPBC336.04	SPCC1259.13	cdc6	chk1	mis10|pol3|pold	rad27	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Francesconi S (1997)	9135148	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
300729	2540255	2539869	276786	276415	SPBC336.04	SPBC11B10.09	cdc6	cdc2	mis10|pol3|pold	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Francesconi S (1997)	9135148	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
300730	2541209	2542632	277723	279086	SPBC887.10	SPAC24H6.05	mcs4	cdc25	-	sal2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Shieh JC (1997)	9136929	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300731	2541055	2541209	277570	277723	SPBC409.07c	SPBC887.10	wis1	mcs4	smf2|spc2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Shieh JC (1997)	9136929	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	overexpression of wis1	-	BIOGRID
300732	2541209	2542873	277723	279318	SPBC887.10	SPAC9G1.02	mcs4	wis4	-	wak1|wik1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Shieh JC (1997)	9136929	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	overexpression of mcs4	-	BIOGRID
300733	2541209	2541055	277723	277570	SPBC887.10	SPBC409.07c	mcs4	wis1	-	smf2|spc2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Shieh JC (1997)	9136929	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	overexpression of mcs4	-	BIOGRID
300734	2541209	2541652	277723	278148	SPBC887.10	SPAC24B11.06c	mcs4	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Shieh JC (1997)	9136929	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	overexpression of mcs4	-	BIOGRID
300735	2543129	2543039	279561	279474	SPAC4F8.13c	SPAC3A12.14	rng2	cam1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Eng K (1998)	9635188	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300736	2543039	2543129	279474	279561	SPAC3A12.14	SPAC4F8.13c	cam1	rng2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Eng K (1998)	9635188	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300737	2543129	2541699	279561	278195	SPAC4F8.13c	SPAP8A3.08	rng2	cdc4	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Eng K (1998)	9635188	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300738	2543129	2539513	279561	276075	SPAC4F8.13c	SPCC645.05c	rng2	myo2	-	rng5	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Eng K (1998)	9635188	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300741	2543670	2540574	280084	277101	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC409.03	eme1	swi5	mms4|slx2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Hope JC (2007)	17353272	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300742	2542337	2540582	278803	277108	SPAC16E8.09	SPBC26H8.07c	scd1	nda3	ral1	alp12|ben1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Li YC (2000)	11063680	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spindle morphology	-	-	BIOGRID
300743	2542337	2539864	278803	276411	SPAC16E8.09	SPBC16A3.15c	scd1	nda2	ral1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Li YC (2000)	11063680	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spindle morphology	-	-	BIOGRID
300744	2542737	2539864	279187	276411	SPAC25B8.14	SPBC16A3.15c	mal2	nda2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fleig U (1996)	8887647	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300761	2542746	2542358	279196	278823	SPAC9G1.09	SPAC1782.09c	sid1	clp1	-	flp1	Co-localization	physical	Trautmann S (2001)	11448769	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300763	2540660	2540624	277185	277150	SPBC21.06c	SPBC24C6.07	cdc7	cdc14	its10|pld1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Marks J (1992)	1527180	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300764	2540660	2542162	277185	278638	SPBC21.06c	SPAC6F6.08c	cdc7	cdc16	its10|pld1	bub2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Marks J (1992)	1527180	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300765	2540624	2542162	277150	278638	SPBC24C6.07	SPAC6F6.08c	cdc14	cdc16	-	bub2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Marks J (1992)	1527180	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300766	2539149	2540660	275721	277185	SPCC1739.11c	SPBC21.06c	cdc11	cdc7	-	its10|pld1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Marks J (1992)	1527180	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300767	2539149	2540624	275721	277150	SPCC1739.11c	SPBC24C6.07	cdc11	cdc14	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Marks J (1992)	1527180	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300768	2540728	2541270	277251	277784	SPBC216.06c	SPBC902.02c	swi1	ctf18	-	chl12	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ansbach AB (2008)	18045993	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300770	2541270	2540215	277784	276748	SPBC902.02c	SPBC83.14c	ctf18	rfc5	chl12	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ansbach AB (2008)	18045993	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300771	2541270	2542790	277784	279239	SPBC902.02c	SPAC1687.03c	ctf18	rfc4	chl12	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ansbach AB (2008)	18045993	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300772	2541643	2542790	278139	279239	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC1687.03c	rad17	rfc4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ansbach AB (2008)	18045993	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300773	2541643	2540215	278139	276748	SPAC14C4.13	SPBC83.14c	rad17	rfc5	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ansbach AB (2008)	18045993	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300774	3361323	2541270	280399	277784	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC902.02c	swi3	ctf18	-	chl12	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ansbach AB (2008)	18045993	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300775	2540728	2539447	277251	276010	SPBC216.06c	SPCC338.17c	swi1	rad21	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ansbach AB (2008)	18045993	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300776	2541270	2539447	277784	276010	SPBC902.02c	SPCC338.17c	ctf18	rad21	chl12	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ansbach AB (2008)	18045993	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	stress resistance	-	-	BIOGRID
300777	3361456	2541620	280532	278117	SPAC1142.03c	SPAC2G11.12	swi2	rqh1	SPAC17G6.20c	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ansbach AB (2008)	18045993	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300778	3361323	2541620	280399	278117	SPBC30D10.04	SPAC2G11.12	swi3	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ansbach AB (2008)	18045993	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300779	2541270	2541620	277784	278117	SPBC902.02c	SPAC2G11.12	ctf18	rqh1	chl12	hus2|rad12|rec9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ansbach AB (2008)	18045993	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	stress resistance	-	-	BIOGRID
300780	2541270	2538959	277784	275533	SPBC902.02c	SPCC18B5.11c	ctf18	cds1	chl12	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ansbach AB (2008)	18045993	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
300781	2541270	2539087	277784	275659	SPBC902.02c	SPCC1259.13	ctf18	chk1	chl12	rad27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ansbach AB (2008)	18045993	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
300782	2541270	2540719	277784	277242	SPBC902.02c	SPBC216.05	ctf18	rad3	chl12	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ansbach AB (2008)	18045993	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
300783	2541141	2540257	277656	276788	SPBC649.05	SPBC32F12.15	cut12	tfb5	stf1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tallada VA (2007)	17409062	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300784	2541141	2542632	277656	279086	SPBC649.05	SPAC24H6.05	cut12	cdc25	stf1	sal2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Tallada VA (2007)	17409062	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300785	2543233	2540051	279661	276589	SPAC630.03	SPBC32H8.12c	arp3	act1	act2	cps8|pi012	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	McCollum D (1996)	8978671	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300786	2541160	2542635	277675	279089	SPBC725.09c	SPAC24H6.09	hob3	gef1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Coll PM (2007)	17363901	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300787	2542635	2541160	279089	277675	SPAC24H6.09	SPBC725.09c	gef1	hob3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Coll PM (2007)	17363901	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300788	2541160	2542635	277675	279089	SPBC725.09c	SPAC24H6.09	hob3	gef1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Coll PM (2007)	17363901	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300789	2541160	2543027	277675	279463	SPBC725.09c	SPAC110.03	hob3	cdc42	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Coll PM (2007)	17363901	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300790	2542635	2543027	279089	279463	SPAC24H6.09	SPAC110.03	gef1	cdc42	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Coll PM (2007)	17363901	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300791	2541160	2541975	277675	278460	SPBC725.09c	SPAC20G8.05c	hob3	cdc15	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Coll PM (2007)	17363901	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300792	2543027	2541160	279463	277675	SPAC110.03	SPBC725.09c	cdc42	hob3	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Coll PM (2007)	17363901	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300793	2541209	2542632	277723	279086	SPBC887.10	SPAC24H6.05	mcs4	cdc25	-	sal2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Cottarel G (1997)	9383051	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300794	2539123	2541209	275695	277723	SPCC18B5.03	SPBC887.10	wee1	mcs4	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Cottarel G (1997)	9383051	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
300795	2541209	2542632	277723	279086	SPBC887.10	SPAC24H6.05	mcs4	cdc25	-	sal2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Cottarel G (1997)	9383051	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	osmotic stress resistance	-	-	BIOGRID
300796	2540660	2541293	277185	277805	SPBC21.06c	SPBC9B6.10	cdc7	cdc37	its10|pld1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Liang J (2007)	17496123	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
300797	2541834	2538741	278325	275324	SPAC824.08	SPCC11E10.05c	gda1	ynd1	gdp1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	D'Alessio C (2003)	12686557	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300798	2540470	2540013	276998	276557	SPBC29A10.15	SPBC14C8.07c	orc1	cdc18	cdc30|orp1|rid1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Grallert B (1996)	8895665	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300799	2540470	2539164	276998	275735	SPBC29A10.15	SPCC16A11.17	orc1	mcm4	cdc30|orp1|rid1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Grallert B (1996)	8895665	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
300800	2541193	2539179	277707	275750	SPBC776.02c	SPCC31H12.05c	dis2	sds21	bws1|sds1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ohkura H (1989)	2544298	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
300801	2542438	2541117	278900	277632	SPAC17C9.01c	SPBC646.13	nuc2	sds23	SPAC1851.01|apc3	moc1|psp1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ishii K (1996)	8978689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|temperature sensitive growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
314306	3838	2540149	110036	276686	-	SPBC1289.03c	KPNA2	spi1	IPOA1|QIP2|RCH1|SRP1alpha	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kutay U (1997)	9323134	9606	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
315274	2541863	5901	278353	111837	SPAC22E12.07	OK/SW-cl.81	rna1	RAN	-	ARA24|Gsp1|TC4	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Hillig RC (1999)	10394366	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
320447	851481	2543334	31983	279757	YDL078C	SPAPB8E5.03	MDH3	mae1	malate dehydrogenase MDH3|L000001047	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Zelle RM (2008)	18344340	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chemical compound accumulation	malate	-	BIOGRID
321844	2543239	2543239	279667	279667	SPAC977.10	SPAC977.10	sod2	sod2	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chen H (2008)	18629612	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
331531	828390	2542615	13679	279069	AT4G22910	SPAC19G12.01c	FZR2	cut20	CCS52A1|F7H19.90|F7H19_90|FIZZY-related 2|cell cycle switch protein 52 A1	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Fueloep K (2005)	15970679	3702	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
331532	826799	2542615	12097	279069	AT4G11920	SPAC19G12.01c	CCS52A2	cut20	FIZZY-RELATED 1|FZR1|T26M18.130|T26M18_130|cell cycle switch protein 52 A2	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Fueloep K (2005)	15970679	3702	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
331533	831230	2542615	16508	279069	AT5G13840	SPAC19G12.01c	FZR3	cut20	FIZZY-related 3|MAC12.21|MAC12_21	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Fueloep K (2005)	15970679	3702	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
338302	3361562	2541155	280638	277670	SPAC11E3.03	SPBC6B1.04	csm1	mde4	pcs1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Gregan J (2007)	17627824	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
338611	2541155	2542358	277670	278823	SPBC6B1.04	SPAC1782.09c	mde4	clp1	-	flp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Choi SH (2009)	19523829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Only the substrate-trapping mutant, Clp1-C286S-13Myc, co-immunoprecipitates with Mde4-GFP.	-	BIOGRID
338612	2542358	2541155	278823	277670	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC6B1.04	clp1	mde4	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Choi SH (2009)	19523829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
338613	2542358	2541155	278823	277670	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC6B1.04	clp1	mde4	flp1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Choi SH (2009)	19523829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Dephosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
338614	2539869	2541155	276415	277670	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC6B1.04	cdc2	mde4	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Choi SH (2009)	19523829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
338615	2539523	2540354	276085	276883	SPCC622.09	SPBC29A3.13	htb1	pdp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang Y (2009)	19250904	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	not in absence of set9 or H4K20 methylation	-	BIOGRID
338616	2539644	3361487	276199	280563	SPBC16E9.01c	SPAC1805.17	php4	crm1	SPBP16F5.09c	SPAC1B2.01|caf2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mercier A (2009)	19502236	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
338617	2539644	2540578	276199	277104	SPBC16E9.01c	SPBC26H8.06	php4	grx4	SPBP16F5.09c	-	PCA	physical	Mercier A (2009)	19502236	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
338618	2539644	2540578	276199	277104	SPBC16E9.01c	SPBC26H8.06	php4	grx4	SPBP16F5.09c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Mercier A (2009)	19502236	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
338619	2541704	948559	278199	852853	SPAC1250.04c	b4058	atl1	uvrA	-	ECK4050|JW4019|dar	Far Western	physical	Tubbs JL (2009)	19516334	284812	511145	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
338620	2541051	2541704	277566	278199	SPBC3E7.08c	SPAC1250.04c	rad13	atl1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tubbs JL (2009)	19516334	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
338621	2543545	2539513	279962	276075	SPAC926.03	SPCC645.05c	rlc1	myo2	-	rng5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sladewski TE (2009)	19570908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
338622	2539513	2543545	276075	279962	SPCC645.05c	SPAC926.03	myo2	rlc1	rng5	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sladewski TE (2009)	19570908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis	Cytokinesis deficiency aggravated by mutation of rlc1 in conjunction with deletion of myo2	-	BIOGRID
338623	2541704	2541120	278199	277635	SPAC1250.04c	SPBC649.03	atl1	rhp14	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tubbs JL (2009)	19516334	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
338624	2541704	2543164	278199	279595	SPAC1250.04c	SPAC3G6.06c	atl1	rad2	-	fen1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tubbs JL (2009)	19516334	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
338625	2539513	2543545	276075	279962	SPCC645.05c	SPAC926.03	myo2	rlc1	rng5	-	Co-purification	physical	Sladewski TE (2009)	19570908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
338626	2538738	2538738	275321	275321	SPCC320.14	SPCC320.14	sry1	sry1	SPCC320.14|SPCC330.15c	SPCC320.14|SPCC330.15c	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Goto M (2009)	19640845	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
338627	2541613	2542267	278110	278736	SPAC1F7.03	SPAPYUK71.03c	pkd2	syn1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Aydar E (2009)	19543678	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
338628	2542267	2541613	278736	278110	SPAPYUK71.03c	SPAC1F7.03	syn1	pkd2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Aydar E (2009)	19543678	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
338629	2538846	2541613	275427	278110	SPCC1919.10c	SPAC1F7.03	myo52	pkd2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Aydar E (2009)	19543678	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
338630	2541613	2540737	278110	277260	SPAC1F7.03	SPBC19G7.05c	pkd2	bgs1	-	cps1|drc1	Co-localization	physical	Aydar E (2009)	19543678	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
338632	2542106	2541798	278582	278289	SPAC8E11.03c	SPAC22F3.03c	dmc1	rdh54	dmp1	mug34|tid1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chi P (2009)	19028606	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
338658	2543382	3361487	279804	280563	SPAC890.02c	SPAC1805.17	alp7	crm1	mia1	SPAC1B2.01|caf2	Co-localization	physical	Ling YC (2009)	19606211	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	crm1 exports mia1 from the nucleus	-	BIOGRID
338659	2543382	2539497	279804	276060	SPAC890.02c	SPCC895.07	alp7	alp14	mia1	mtc1	Co-localization	physical	Ling YC (2009)	19606211	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	crm1 exports mia1 from the nucleus	-	BIOGRID
338660	2543382	2539497	279804	276060	SPAC890.02c	SPCC895.07	alp7	alp14	mia1	mtc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ling YC (2009)	19606211	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	crm1 exports mia1 from the nucleus	-	BIOGRID
338706	415296	5802965	676968	858103	RCJMB04_1h13	SPAC11H11.06	ACTG1	arp2	actin|cytoplasmic	SPAC22F8.01	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chan C (2009)	19362000	9031	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
338707	415296	2543233	676968	279661	RCJMB04_1h13	SPAC630.03	ACTG1	arp3	actin|cytoplasmic	act2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chan C (2009)	19362000	9031	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
338708	415296	2541738	676968	278232	RCJMB04_1h13	SPAC20G4.06c	ACTG1	adf1	actin|cytoplasmic	cof1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chan C (2009)	19362000	9031	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
338709	2542622	2541675	279076	278171	SPAC18B11.07c	SPAC22F8.12c	rhp6	shf1	sng1|ubc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zofall M (2007)	17363370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
338710	2542622	2539307	279076	275874	SPAC18B11.07c	SPCC970.10c	rhp6	brl2	sng1|ubc2	rfp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zofall M (2007)	17363370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
338711	2542622	2539102	279076	275674	SPAC18B11.07c	SPCC1919.15	rhp6	brl1	sng1|ubc2	SPCC790.01|rfp2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zofall M (2007)	17363370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
338712	2541675	2542622	278171	279076	SPAC22F8.12c	SPAC18B11.07c	shf1	rhp6	-	sng1|ubc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zofall M (2007)	17363370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
338713	2541675	2539307	278171	275874	SPAC22F8.12c	SPCC970.10c	shf1	brl2	-	rfp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zofall M (2007)	17363370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
338714	2541675	2539102	278171	275674	SPAC22F8.12c	SPCC1919.15	shf1	brl1	-	SPCC790.01|rfp2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zofall M (2007)	17363370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
338720	2542150	2542808	278626	279256	SPAC17A5.11	SPAC15E1.07c	rec12	moa1	spo11	mug159	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sakuno T (2009)	19370027	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	kinetochore stability decreases in the double mutant compared to rec12 single mutant	-	BIOGRID
338721	2542150	2543078	278626	279511	SPAC17A5.11	SPAC31A2.15c	rec12	dcc1	spo11	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sakuno T (2009)	19370027	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	kinetochore stability decreases in the double mutant compared to rec12 single mutant	-	BIOGRID
338722	2542150	2541270	278626	277784	SPAC17A5.11	SPBC902.02c	rec12	ctf18	spo11	chl12	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sakuno T (2009)	19370027	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	kinetochore stability decreases in the double mutant compared to rec12 single mutant	-	BIOGRID
338723	2542150	2541628	278626	278124	SPAC17A5.11	SPAC110.02	rec12	pds5	spo11	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sakuno T (2009)	19370027	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	kinetochore stability decreases in the double mutant compared to rec12 single mutant	-	BIOGRID
338732	2542622	2541675	279076	278171	SPAC18B11.07c	SPAC22F8.12c	rhp6	shf1	sng1|ubc2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Zofall M (2007)	17363370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type|protein/peptide distribution:wild type	Overexpression of Rhp6 abrogates silencing of a reporter construct and reduces Swi6 localization at centromeres.  Overexpression of Rhp6 in rfp1 rfp2 or shf1 mutant cells no longer has this effect.	-	BIOGRID
338733	2542622	2539307	279076	275874	SPAC18B11.07c	SPCC970.10c	rhp6	brl2	sng1|ubc2	rfp1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Zofall M (2007)	17363370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type|protein/peptide distribution:wild type	Overexpression of Rhp6 abrogates silencing of a reporter construct and reduces Swi6 localization at centromeres.  Overexpression of Rhp6 in rfp1 rfp2 or shf1 mutant cells no longer has this effect.|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
338734	2542622	2539102	279076	275674	SPAC18B11.07c	SPCC1919.15	rhp6	brl1	sng1|ubc2	SPCC790.01|rfp2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Zofall M (2007)	17363370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type|protein/peptide distribution:wild type	Overexpression of Rhp6 abrogates silencing of a reporter construct and reduces Swi6 localization at centromeres.  Overexpression of Rhp6 in rfp1 rfp2 or shf1 mutant cells no longer has this effect.|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
338735	2542622	2539523	279076	276085	SPAC18B11.07c	SPCC622.09	rhp6	htb1	sng1|ubc2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Zofall M (2007)	17363370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type	Overexpression of Rhp6 abrogates silencing of a reporter construct, but this is suppressed in H2B-K119R mutants.	-	BIOGRID
338744	2541155	2538736	277670	275320	SPBC6B1.04	SPCC1322.12c	mde4	bub1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Choi SH (2009)	19523829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
338745	2541155	2540320	277670	276850	SPBC6B1.04	SPBC3D6.04c	mde4	mad1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Choi SH (2009)	19523829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
338746	2541155	2540589	277670	277115	SPBC6B1.04	SPBC20F10.06	mde4	mad2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Choi SH (2009)	19523829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
338747	2541155	2539219	277670	275789	SPBC6B1.04	SPCC1795.01c	mde4	mad3	-	SPCC895.02	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Choi SH (2009)	19523829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
338764	2543378	2543456	279800	279876	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAC3H1.05	pac10	SPAC3H1.05	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338765	2539348	2542254	275914	278724	SPCC18B5.07c	SPAC30D11.04c	nup61	nup124	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338766	2541858	2542701	278348	279154	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC26H5.05	alp13	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338767	3361269	2541624	280345	278120	SPBC31A8.01c	SPAC23C11.15	rtn1	pst2	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338768	2541498	2543456	278000	279876	SPAC227.10	SPAC3H1.05	SPAC227.10	SPAC3H1.05	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338769	2542250	2541624	278720	278120	SPAC17D4.03c	SPAC23C11.15	cis4	pst2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338770	2540689	2540001	277214	276545	SPBC428.06c	SPBC1289.13c	rxt2	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338771	2541858	2538955	278348	275529	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC1450.02	alp13	bdf1	-	SPCC191.13|brf1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338772	3361561	2541858	280637	278348	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC23H4.12	swr1	alp13	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338773	2540689	2541899	277214	278389	SPBC428.06c	SPAC22E12.11c	rxt2	set3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338774	3361391	2543685	280467	280099	SPAC13G6.01c	SPAC3C7.03c	rad8	rad55	SPAC5H10.14c	rhp55	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338775	2542701	2539855	279154	276403	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC14F5.07	mga2	doa10	SPAC26H5.05	ssm4	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338776	3361561	2540749	280637	277271	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC4B4.03	swr1	rsc1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338777	2540719	2541088	277242	277603	SPBC216.05	SPBC609.05	rad3	pob3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338778	2539668	2540749	276223	277271	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC4B4.03	pht1	rsc1	pi001	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338779	2541941	2543670	278428	280084	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAPB1E7.06c	tfs1	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338780	2539668	2541858	276223	278348	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC23H4.12	pht1	alp13	pi001	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338781	2539930	2541624	276474	278120	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC23C11.15	reb1	pst2	SPBC660.01c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338782	2539953	2540001	276497	276545	SPBC1709.11c	SPBC1289.13c	png2	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338783	2540689	2540749	277214	277271	SPBC428.06c	SPBC4B4.03	rxt2	rsc1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338784	2542135	2541792	278611	278283	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC22E12.19	ubp8	snt1	-	SPAC2E12.01	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338785	2543378	2541792	279800	278283	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAC22E12.19	pac10	snt1	-	SPAC2E12.01	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338786	2540998	2542701	277514	279154	SPBC3D6.05	SPAC26H5.05	ptp4	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338787	2540689	2542571	277214	279027	SPBC428.06c	SPAC589.02c	rxt2	med13	-	spTrap240|srb9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338788	2539444	2541624	276007	278120	SPCC576.13	SPAC23C11.15	swc5	pst2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338789	2541858	2541220	278348	277734	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC8D2.04	alp13	hht2	-	h3.2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338790	2542252	2541624	278722	278120	SPAC17A2.13c	SPAC23C11.15	rad25	pst2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338791	2542571	2542701	279027	279154	SPAC589.02c	SPAC26H5.05	med13	mga2	spTrap240|srb9	SPAC26H5.05	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338792	2543341	2541624	279764	278120	SPAC8E11.07c	SPAC23C11.15	alp31	pst2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338793	2540080	2542701	276618	279154	SPBC16H5.04	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC16H5.04	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338794	2540554	2541088	277081	277603	SPBC29A10.03c	SPBC609.05	pcf1	pob3	SPBC365.19c|rlf2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338795	2541624	2541220	278120	277734	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC8D2.04	pst2	hht2	-	h3.2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338796	2541858	2542123	278348	278599	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC18G6.15	alp13	mal3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338797	2539244	2539668	275814	276223	SPCC1672.06c	SPBC11B10.10c	asp1	pht1	vip1	pi001	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338798	2540689	2541819	277214	278310	SPBC428.06c	SPAC6G9.08	rxt2	ubp6	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338799	2540689	2543452	277214	279872	SPBC428.06c	SPAC3G9.04	rxt2	ssu72	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338800	2539564	2541858	276125	278348	SPCC550.12	SPAC23H4.12	arp6	alp13	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338801	2541071	2541643	277586	278139	SPBC582.05c	SPAC14C4.13	brc1	rad17	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338802	2541024	2541624	277539	278120	SPBC337.15c	SPAC23C11.15	coq7	pst2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338803	2541624	2540749	278120	277271	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC4B4.03	pst2	rsc1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338804	2540719	2541580	277242	278077	SPBC216.05	SPAC1687.05	rad3	pli1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338805	2540689	2543064	277214	279497	SPBC428.06c	SPAC3G6.01	rxt2	hrp3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338806	2540979	2541624	277495	278120	SPBC3H7.10	SPAC23C11.15	elp6	pst2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338807	2541624	2541322	278120	277834	SPAC23C11.15	SPBP4H10.09	pst2	rsv1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338808	2542464	2541498	278925	278000	SPAC1A6.09c	SPAC227.10	lag1	SPAC227.10	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338809	2542502	2541858	278960	278348	SPAC139.06	SPAC23H4.12	hat1	alp13	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338810	2539737	2540929	276289	277445	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC354.03	nrm1	swd3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338811	2539348	2539928	275914	276472	SPCC18B5.07c	SPBC1604.08c	nup61	imp1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338812	2541858	2540749	278348	277271	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC4B4.03	alp13	rsc1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338813	2541858	2540512	278348	277040	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC29A3.05	alp13	vps71	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338814	2541624	2540115	278120	276652	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC1778.02	pst2	rap1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338815	2541378	2542677	277889	279130	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC26F1.10c	ubp3	pyp1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338816	2543456	2542701	279876	279154	SPAC3H1.05	SPAC26H5.05	SPAC3H1.05	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338817	2541858	2543426	278348	279846	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC631.02	alp13	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338818	2541858	2539444	278348	276007	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC576.13	alp13	swc5	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338819	2541624	2540221	278120	276754	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC32F12.02	pst2	rec14	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338820	2538694	2541624	275279	278120	SPCC191.09c	SPAC23C11.15	gst1	pst2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338821	2540947	2539567	277463	276127	SPBC354.07c	SPCC70.06	SPBC354.07c	SPCC70.06	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338822	2542019	2541614	278502	278111	SPAC23A1.17	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC23A1.17	elp3	-	kat9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338823	2539035	2541614	275608	278111	SPCC794.09c	SPAC29A4.20	tef101	elp3	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	kat9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338824	2539737	2540719	276289	277242	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC216.05	nrm1	rad3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338825	2541071	2543577	277586	279992	SPBC582.05c	SPAC4H3.05	brc1	srs2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338826	2540436	2541624	276964	278120	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC23C11.15	ngg1	pst2	ada3|kap1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338827	2543378	2541858	279800	278348	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAC23H4.12	pac10	alp13	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338828	2540689	2542123	277214	278599	SPBC428.06c	SPAC18G6.15	rxt2	mal3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338829	2540695	2540821	277219	277339	SPBC19G7.01c	SPBC800.03	msh2	clr3	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338830	2540689	2542519	277214	278977	SPBC428.06c	SPAC19G12.08	rxt2	scs7	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338831	2541071	2542032	277586	278514	SPBC582.05c	SPAC23C11.04c	brc1	pnk1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338832	2538849	2540821	275430	277339	SPCC330.14c	SPBC800.03	rpl2402	clr3	rpl24-2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338833	2539928	2541614	276472	278111	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC29A4.20	imp1	elp3	-	kat9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338834	2540318	2543643	276848	280057	SPBC30B4.04c	SPAC3G9.07c	sol1	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338835	2540689	2540979	277214	277495	SPBC428.06c	SPBC3H7.10	rxt2	elp6	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338836	2541858	2542278	278348	278747	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC17G8.07	alp13	yaf9	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338837	2539668	2542255	276223	278725	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC57A7.08	pht1	pzh1	pi001	phz1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338838	2542170	2541322	278645	277834	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBP4H10.09	mst2	rsv1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338839	2542571	2541858	279027	278348	SPAC589.02c	SPAC23H4.12	med13	alp13	spTrap240|srb9	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338840	2541208	2541792	277722	278283	SPBC887.04c	SPAC22E12.19	lub1	snt1	-	SPAC2E12.01	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338841	2540689	2543563	277214	279979	SPBC428.06c	SPAC664.02c	rxt2	arp8	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338842	3361561	2540001	280637	276545	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC1289.13c	swr1	gmh6	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPBC1289.13c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338843	2539667	2541624	276222	278120	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC23C11.15	ash2	pst2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338844	2541013	2542701	277528	279154	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC26H5.05	far10	mga2	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	SPAC26H5.05	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338845	2540689	2539928	277214	276472	SPBC428.06c	SPBC1604.08c	rxt2	imp1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338846	2541624	2542145	278120	278621	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC17C9.09c	pst2	tim13	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338847	2540689	2539604	277214	276162	SPBC428.06c	SPBC1105.14	rxt2	rsv2	-	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338848	2541624	2539604	278120	276162	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC1105.14	pst2	rsv2	-	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338849	2541856	2541858	278347	278348	SPAC23H3.08c	SPAC23H4.12	bub3	alp13	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338850	2541153	2542309	277668	278775	SPBC725.16	SPAC16A10.02	res1	sub1	sct1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338851	2540837	2542234	277355	278706	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC9E9.14	ubp4	vps24	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338852	2540355	2539030	276884	275603	SPBC25B2.11	SPCP1E11.02	pof2	ppk38	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338853	2541624	2542432	278120	278894	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC1805.15c	pst2	pub2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338854	2538892	2541153	275470	277668	SPCC1393.03	SPBC725.16	rps1501	res1	rps15-1	sct1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338855	2540821	2541013	277339	277528	SPBC800.03	SPBC3H7.13	clr3	far10	-	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338856	2539567	2540001	276127	276545	SPCC70.06	SPBC1289.13c	SPCC70.06	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338857	2543378	2541624	279800	278120	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAC23C11.15	pac10	pst2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338858	2541208	2543192	277722	279621	SPBC887.04c	SPAC343.18	lub1	rfp2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338859	2542066	2541858	278543	278348	SPAC227.05	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC227.05	alp13	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338860	2541941	2542136	278428	278612	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC17A2.06c	tfs1	vps8	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338861	2540689	2539570	277214	276130	SPBC428.06c	SPCC61.02	rxt2	spt3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338862	2540043	2539953	276581	276497	SPBC1198.12	SPBC1709.11c	mfr1	png2	SPBC660.02|fzr1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338863	2540725	2540821	277248	277339	SPBC215.14c	SPBC800.03	vps20	clr3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338864	2539953	2542750	276497	279200	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC1635.01	png2	SPAC1635.01	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338865	2541856	2541153	278347	277668	SPAC23H3.08c	SPBC725.16	bub3	res1	-	sct1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338866	2539667	2541858	276222	278348	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC23H4.12	ash2	alp13	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338867	2540689	2542309	277214	278775	SPBC428.06c	SPAC16A10.02	rxt2	sub1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338868	2541153	2541586	277668	278083	SPBC725.16	SPAC24C9.07c	res1	bgs2	sct1	meu21|pgs2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338869	2539920	2540001	276464	276545	SPBC119.08	SPBC1289.13c	pmk1	gmh6	spm1	SPBC1289.13c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338870	2540821	2540981	277339	277497	SPBC800.03	SPBC3B9.09	clr3	vps36	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338871	2539668	2542136	276223	278612	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC17A2.06c	pht1	vps8	pi001	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338872	2541153	2542278	277668	278747	SPBC725.16	SPAC17G8.07	res1	yaf9	sct1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338873	2542542	2541819	278999	278310	SPAC19A8.10	SPAC6G9.08	rfp1	ubp6	mug140	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338874	2541153	2542228	277668	278701	SPBC725.16	SPAC823.03	res1	ppk15	sct1	SPAC1E11.03	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338875	2541858	2542227	278348	278700	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC5H10.13c	alp13	gmh2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338876	2539953	2543505	276497	279923	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC637.09	png2	SPAC637.09	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338877	2543643	2540725	280057	277248	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC215.14c	hos2	vps20	hda1|phd1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338878	2541071	2543164	277586	279595	SPBC582.05c	SPAC3G6.06c	brc1	rad2	-	fen1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338879	2542541	2541624	278998	278120	SPAC1B3.03c	SPAC23C11.15	wis2	pst2	cyp5	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338880	2541284	2541088	277797	277603	SPBC947.08c	SPBC609.05	hip4	pob3	hpc2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338881	2542504	2542701	278962	279154	SPAC589.06c	SPAC26H5.05	SPAC589.06c	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338882	2541337	2541858	277848	278348	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC23H4.12	swc2	alp13	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338883	2541053	2541624	277568	278120	SPBC56F2.10c	SPAC23C11.15	alg5	pst2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338884	2540821	2540828	277339	277346	SPBC800.03	SPBC4B4.06	clr3	vps25	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338885	2539953	2542260	276497	278729	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC1F12.05	png2	SPAC1F12.05	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338886	2540689	2541337	277214	277848	SPBC428.06c	SPBP35G2.13c	rxt2	swc2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338887	2540689	3361561	277214	280637	SPBC428.06c	SPAC11E3.01c	rxt2	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338888	2540689	2542541	277214	278998	SPBC428.06c	SPAC1B3.03c	rxt2	wis2	-	cyp5	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338889	2539809	2541624	276359	278120	SPBC16E9.02c	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC16E9.02c	pst2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338890	3361561	2542292	280637	278760	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC17G8.11c	swr1	imt3	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338891	2541757	2541624	278251	278120	SPAC2F7.10	SPAC23C11.15	akr1	pst2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338892	2541720	3361342	278214	280418	SPAC23H3.13c	SPBC16D10.07c	gpa2	sir2	git8	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338893	2540689	2538868	277214	275448	SPBC428.06c	SPCC132.02	rxt2	hst2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338894	2540355	2541378	276884	277889	SPBC25B2.11	SPBP8B7.21	pof2	ubp3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338895	2540689	2540893	277214	277409	SPBC428.06c	SPBC543.10	rxt2	get1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338896	2540821	2539101	277339	275673	SPBC800.03	SPCC736.04c	clr3	gma12	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338897	2542502	3361342	278960	280418	SPAC139.06	SPBC16D10.07c	hat1	sir2	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338898	2541858	2540765	278348	277285	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC1D7.01	alp13	pfd1	-	SPBC1D7.01	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338899	2539687	2539953	276242	276497	SPBC1711.05	SPBC1709.11c	SPBC1711.05	png2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338900	2539567	2539893	276127	276439	SPCC70.06	SPBC1539.10	SPCC70.06	nop16	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338901	2541498	2542114	278000	278590	SPAC227.10	SPAC30D11.05	SPAC227.10	aps3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338902	2541858	2542542	278348	278999	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC19A8.10	alp13	rfp1	-	mug140	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338903	2543214	2541624	279643	278120	SPAC6F12.06	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC6F12.06	pst2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338904	2539953	2540808	276497	277327	SPBC1709.11c	SPBC418.02	png2	SPBC418.02	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338905	2543378	2543390	279800	279812	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAC631.01c	pac10	acp2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
338906	2543100	2541819	279532	278310	SPAC12B10.14c	SPAC6G9.08	tea5	ubp6	ppk2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338907	2540689	2539208	277214	275778	SPBC428.06c	SPCC1450.11c	rxt2	cek1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338908	2539244	2541378	275814	277889	SPCC1672.06c	SPBP8B7.21	asp1	ubp3	vip1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338909	2541624	2539101	278120	275673	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC736.04c	pst2	gma12	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338910	3361391	2540646	280467	277171	SPAC13G6.01c	SPBC23G7.11	rad8	mag2	SPAC5H10.14c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338911	2540337	2541624	276866	278120	SPBC28F2.11	SPAC23C11.15	hmo1	pst2	SPBC28F2.11	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338912	2541378	2542200	277889	278675	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC19D5.01	ubp3	pyp2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338913	2540800	2539995	277319	276539	SPBC409.20c	SPBC1105.09	psh3	ubc15	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338914	2539249	2539101	275819	275673	SPCC1450.05c	SPCC736.04c	rox3	gma12	med19	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338915	2542318	2541624	278784	278120	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC23C11.15	cph1	pst2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338916	2541208	2539738	277722	276290	SPBC887.04c	SPBC17G9.09	lub1	tif213	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338917	2541624	2540306	278120	276836	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC2G5.02c	pst2	ckb2	-	SPBC2G5.02c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338918	2540727	2541624	277250	278120	SPBC1921.03c	SPAC23C11.15	mex67	pst2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338919	2541858	2539101	278348	275673	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC736.04c	alp13	gma12	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338920	2541498	2542724	278000	279175	SPAC227.10	SPAC767.01c	SPAC227.10	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338921	2539920	2540808	276464	277327	SPBC119.08	SPBC418.02	pmk1	SPBC418.02	spm1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338922	2540993	2539995	277509	276539	SPBC342.01c	SPBC1105.09	alg6	ubc15	SPBC3F6.06c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338923	2541858	2541438	278348	277943	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC23G3.10c	alp13	ssr3	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338924	2539615	2539570	276173	276130	SPBC1773.02c	SPCC61.02	bcp1	spt3	SPBC1773.02c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338925	2543100	2539920	279532	276464	SPAC12B10.14c	SPBC119.08	tea5	pmk1	ppk2	spm1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338926	2540689	2542135	277214	278611	SPBC428.06c	SPAC13A11.04c	rxt2	ubp8	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338927	2539847	2541858	276395	278348	SPBC530.14c	SPAC23H4.12	dsk1	alp13	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338928	2541153	2541789	277668	278281	SPBC725.16	SPAC23H4.08	res1	iwr1	sct1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338929	2540821	2540001	277339	276545	SPBC800.03	SPBC1289.13c	clr3	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338930	2542459	2541624	278920	278120	SPAC1D4.03c	SPAC23C11.15	aut12	pst2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338931	2541858	2539953	278348	276497	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC1709.11c	alp13	png2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338932	2542293	2541378	278761	277889	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBP8B7.21	pck1	ubp3	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338933	2542135	2540001	278611	276545	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC1289.13c	ubp8	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338934	2539567	2540219	276127	276752	SPCC70.06	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC70.06	hip1	-	hir1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338935	2540689	2539209	277214	275779	SPBC428.06c	SPCC23B6.03c	rxt2	tel1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338936	2539567	2541322	276127	277834	SPCC70.06	SPBP4H10.09	SPCC70.06	rsv1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338937	2542144	2541614	278620	278111	SPAC6F6.17	SPAC29A4.20	rif1	elp3	SPAPJ736.01|tap1|tap11	kat9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338938	3361323	2542528	280399	278986	SPBC30D10.04	SPAC1B3.08	swi3	SPAC1B3.08	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338939	2541858	2539188	278348	275759	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC1827.04	alp13	vms1	-	SPCC1827.04	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338940	2540892	2539995	277408	276539	SPBC530.01	SPBC1105.09	gyp1	ubc15	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338941	2541776	2540128	278270	276665	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC15D4.03	swd1	slm9	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338942	2540967	2539567	277483	276127	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC70.06	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC70.06	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338943	2541624	2541792	278120	278283	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC22E12.19	pst2	snt1	-	SPAC2E12.01	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338944	2541858	2540306	278348	276836	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC2G5.02c	alp13	ckb2	-	SPBC2G5.02c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338945	2541858	2542350	278348	278815	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC1782.04	alp13	cox24	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338946	2543378	2539687	279800	276242	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC1711.05	pac10	SPBC1711.05	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338947	2540689	2541792	277214	278283	SPBC428.06c	SPAC22E12.19	rxt2	snt1	-	SPAC2E12.01	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338948	2543678	2541614	280092	278111	SPAC637.11	SPAC29A4.20	rpm2	elp3	pah1|suv3	kat9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338949	2542318	2541858	278784	278348	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC23H4.12	cph1	alp13	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338950	2539335	2541624	275901	278120	SPCC1450.16c	SPAC23C11.15	ptl1	pst2	SPCC1450.16c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338951	2539729	2542701	276281	279154	SPBC11B10.07c	SPAC26H5.05	ivn1	mga2	pi004|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	SPAC26H5.05	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338952	2539737	2541378	276289	277889	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBP8B7.21	nrm1	ubp3	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338953	2541858	2542513	278348	278971	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC1952.05	alp13	gcn5	-	kat2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338954	2540981	2541614	277497	278111	SPBC3B9.09	SPAC29A4.20	vps36	elp3	-	kat9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338955	2541624	2542513	278120	278971	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC1952.05	pst2	gcn5	-	kat2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338956	2542701	2540920	279154	277436	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC342.03	mga2	gas4	SPAC26H5.05	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338957	2539729	2541624	276281	278120	SPBC11B10.07c	SPAC23C11.15	ivn1	pst2	pi004|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338958	2538833	2541614	275414	278111	SPCP1E11.11	SPAC29A4.20	puf6	elp3	-	kat9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338959	2539102	2542701	275674	279154	SPCC1919.15	SPAC26H5.05	brl1	mga2	SPCC790.01|rfp2	SPAC26H5.05	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338960	2542973	2541614	279412	278111	SPAC10F6.04	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC10F6.04	elp3	-	kat9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338961	2543020	2541614	279456	278111	SPAC10F6.13c	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC10F6.13c	elp3	-	kat9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338962	2539188	2542701	275759	279154	SPCC1827.04	SPAC26H5.05	vms1	mga2	SPCC1827.04	SPAC26H5.05	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338963	2542701	2540893	279154	277409	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC543.10	mga2	get1	SPAC26H5.05	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
338964	2541021	2542701	277536	279154	SPBC3B8.10c	SPAC26H5.05	nem1	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Beltrao P (2009)	19547744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
344186	2540582	2541856	277108	278347	SPBC26H8.07c	SPAC23H3.08c	nda3	bub3	alp12|ben1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Vanoosthuyse V (2009)	19846658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
344187	2542004	2541856	278487	278347	SPAC27F1.04c	SPAC23H3.08c	nuf2	bub3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Vanoosthuyse V (2009)	19846658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
344188	2542387	2541856	278851	278347	SPAC17H9.20	SPAC23H3.08c	psc3	bub3	SPAC607.01	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Vanoosthuyse V (2009)	19846658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
344189	2540719	2540234	277242	276766	SPBC216.05	SPBC336.12c	rad3	cdc10	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Dutta C (2009)	19750219	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in S phase:undetermined|resistance to chemicals:undetermined	double mutants show decreased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
344811	2541710	3361561	278205	280637	SPAC343.11c	SPAC11E3.01c	msc1	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hou H (2010)	19910462	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
344812	2541710	2543227	278205	279655	SPAC343.11c	SPAPB8E5.09	msc1	rvb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hou H (2010)	19910462	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
344813	2541710	2541077	278205	277592	SPAC343.11c	SPBC83.08	msc1	rvb2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hou H (2010)	19910462	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
344814	2541710	2540051	278205	276589	SPAC343.11c	SPBC32H8.12c	msc1	act1	-	cps8|pi012	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hou H (2010)	19910462	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
344815	2541710	2541318	278205	277830	SPAC343.11c	SPBP23A10.08	msc1	alp5	-	arp4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hou H (2010)	19910462	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
344816	2541710	2539564	278205	276125	SPAC343.11c	SPCC550.12	msc1	arp6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hou H (2010)	19910462	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
344817	2541710	2541337	278205	277848	SPAC343.11c	SPBP35G2.13c	msc1	swc2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hou H (2010)	19910462	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
344818	2541710	2542412	278205	278876	SPAC343.11c	SPAC9G1.13c	msc1	swc4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hou H (2010)	19910462	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
344819	2541710	2539668	278205	276223	SPAC343.11c	SPBC11B10.10c	msc1	pht1	-	pi001	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hou H (2010)	19910462	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
344820	3361561	2541710	280637	278205	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC343.11c	swr1	msc1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hou H (2010)	19910462	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
344821	3361561	2541710	280637	278205	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC343.11c	swr1	msc1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hou H (2010)	19910462	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
344822	3361561	3361561	280637	280637	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC11E3.01c	swr1	swr1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hou H (2010)	19910462	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
344823	3361561	2543227	280637	279655	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAPB8E5.09	swr1	rvb1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hou H (2010)	19910462	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
344824	3361561	2541077	280637	277592	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC83.08	swr1	rvb2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hou H (2010)	19910462	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
344825	3361561	2540051	280637	276589	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC32H8.12c	swr1	act1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	cps8|pi012	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hou H (2010)	19910462	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
344826	3361561	2541318	280637	277830	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBP23A10.08	swr1	alp5	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	arp4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hou H (2010)	19910462	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
344827	3361561	2539564	280637	276125	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC550.12	swr1	arp6	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hou H (2010)	19910462	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
344828	3361561	2541337	280637	277848	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBP35G2.13c	swr1	swc2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hou H (2010)	19910462	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
344829	3361561	2542412	280637	278876	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC9G1.13c	swr1	swc4	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hou H (2010)	19910462	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
344830	3361561	2539668	280637	276223	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC11B10.10c	swr1	pht1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	pi001	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hou H (2010)	19910462	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
344831	2543129	2539765	279561	276316	SPAC4F8.13c	SPBC1778.06c	rng2	fim1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Takaine M (2009)	19713940	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
344832	2543001	2542761	279439	279211	SPAC1006.08	SPAC1565.06c	etd1	spg1	-	sid3	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Garcia-Cortes JC (2009)	19736319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:wild type|metabolism and growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
344833	2543001	2542761	279439	279211	SPAC1006.08	SPAC1565.06c	etd1	spg1	-	sid3	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Garcia-Cortes JC (2009)	19736319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
344834	2540255	2539627	276786	276184	SPBC336.04	SPBC1734.02c	cdc6	cdc27	mis10|pol3|pold	SPBC337.18c	Two-hybrid	physical	Sanchez Garcia J (2009)	19686603	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
344835	2542083	2539627	278560	276184	SPAC27E2.05	SPBC1734.02c	cdc1	cdc27	mis1	SPBC337.18c	Two-hybrid	physical	Sanchez Garcia J (2009)	19686603	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
344836	3361306	2538706	280382	275290	SPBC6B1.09c	SPCC338.08	nbs1	ctp1	slr10	mug38|nip1|slr9	Protein-peptide	physical	Lloyd J (2009)	19804756	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
344837	2539869	2543372	276415	279794	SPBC11B10.09	SPAPB1A10.09	cdc2	ase1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Fu C (2009)	19686686	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
344907	2543460	2538689	279880	275274	SPAC3H5.10	SPCC1795.11	rpl3202	sum3	rpl32|rpl32-2	ded1|moc2|slh3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
344908	2541045	2541620	277560	278117	SPBC543.03c	SPAC2G11.12	pku80	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Miyoshi T (2009)	19682091	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in S phase|metabolism and growth|nuclear morphology	-	-	BIOGRID
345914	2538959	2540802	275533	277321	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC1921.02	cds1	rad60	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Miyabe I (2009)	19755492	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
345915	2540802	2539020	277321	275593	SPBC1921.02	SPCC5E4.06	rad60	smc6	-	rad18	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Miyabe I (2009)	19755492	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
346465	2541652	2542558	278148	279014	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC1952.07	sty1	rad1	phh1|spc1	rad19	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Alao JP (2009)	19723888	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	-	-	BIOGRID
346466	2541688	2542389	278184	278853	SPAC25G10.04c	SPAC17A5.18c	rec10	rec25	rec20	mug19	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Spirek M (2010)	19756689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
346467	2541688	2541083	278184	277598	SPAC25G10.04c	SPBC577.05c	rec10	rec27	rec20	mug41	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Spirek M (2010)	19756689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
346468	2541688	2540990	278184	277506	SPAC25G10.04c	SPBC36B7.06c	rec10	mug20	rec20	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Spirek M (2010)	19756689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
346469	2541688	2539225	278184	275795	SPAC25G10.04c	SPCC1739.13	rec10	ssa2	rec20	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Spirek M (2010)	19756689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
346470	2541688	2540547	278184	277074	SPAC25G10.04c	SPBC32F12.11	rec10	tdh1	rec20	gpd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Spirek M (2010)	19756689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
346471	2541688	2540064	278184	276602	SPAC25G10.04c	SPBC1718.02	rec10	hop1	rec20	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Spirek M (2010)	19756689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
346472	2541688	2540557	278184	277084	SPAC25G10.04c	SPBC29A10.04	rec10	psm1	rec20	smc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Spirek M (2010)	19756689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
346473	2541688	2543010	278184	279448	SPAC25G10.04c	SPAC10F6.09c	rec10	psm3	rec20	smc3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Spirek M (2010)	19756689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
346474	2541688	2539639	278184	276194	SPAC25G10.04c	SPBC106.09	rec10	cut4	rec20	apc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Spirek M (2010)	19756689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
346475	2541688	2542678	278184	279131	SPAC25G10.04c	SPAC29B12.07	rec10	sec16	rec20	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Spirek M (2010)	19756689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
346476	2541688	2539045	278184	275618	SPAC25G10.04c	SPCC1235.05c	rec10	fft2	rec20	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Spirek M (2010)	19756689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
346477	2539497	2543382	276060	279804	SPCC895.07	SPAC890.02c	alp14	alp7	mtc1	mia1	Two-hybrid	physical	Sato M (2009)	19696784	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
346478	2539209	2540719	275779	277242	SPCC23B6.03c	SPBC216.05	tel1	rad3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Moser BA (2009)	19714219	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	-	-	BIOGRID
346479	2539352	2542703	275918	279156	SPCC188.07	SPAC26H5.06	ccq1	pot1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Moser BA (2009)	19714219	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
348350	2541455	2541141	277958	277656	SPAC6G9.06c	SPBC649.05	pcp1	cut12	-	stf1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Fong CS (2010)	19942852	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
348351	2541455	2539123	277958	275695	SPAC6G9.06c	SPCC18B5.03	pcp1	wee1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Fong CS (2010)	19942852	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
349436	2543556	2542807	279973	279255	SPAC4F10.20	SPAC15E1.09	grx1	grx2	TTase1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chung WH (2004)	15358115	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
349443	2541055	2539123	277570	275695	SPBC409.07c	SPCC18B5.03	wis1	wee1	smf2|spc2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Warbrick E (1991)	1756736	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:partial rescue	mutants suppress the cell length defects caused by wis1 mutation	-	BIOGRID
349444	2541055	2539869	277570	276415	SPBC409.07c	SPBC11B10.09	wis1	cdc2	smf2|spc2	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Warbrick E (1991)	1756736	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:partial rescue	mutants suppress the cell length defects caused by wis1 mutation	-	BIOGRID
349445	2541055	2542632	277570	279086	SPBC409.07c	SPAC24H6.05	wis1	cdc25	smf2|spc2	sal2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Warbrick E (1991)	1756736	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:partial rescue	cdc25 overexpression suppresses the cell length defects caused by wis1 mutation	-	BIOGRID
349446	2541055	2540072	277570	276610	SPBC409.07c	SPBC16H5.07c	wis1	ppa2	smf2|spc2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Warbrick E (1991)	1756736	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:partial rescue	mutants suppress the cell length defects caused by wis1 mutation	-	BIOGRID
349585	3361533	2543281	280609	279708	SPAC222.15	SPAC23C4.18c	meu13	rad4	SPAC821.01	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Perera D (2004)	14718568	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:partial rescue	double mutants proceed to meiosis I more quickly than meu13 single mutants	-	BIOGRID
349586	2541843	2539123	278334	275695	SPAC23H3.02c	SPCC18B5.03	ini1	wee1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Oltra E (2004)	14762117	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression|cell size	-	-	BIOGRID
349588	2542714	2538902	279167	275480	SPAC5H10.06c	SPCC13B11.01	adh4	adh1	-	adh	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sakurai M (2004)	15040954	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
349589	2542714	2538902	279167	275480	SPAC5H10.06c	SPCC13B11.01	adh4	adh1	-	adh	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sakurai M (2004)	15040954	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chemical compound accumulation|chemical compound excretion	double mutants show a synthetic loss of ADH activity and ethanol production and increased glycerol production	-	BIOGRID
349590	2539869	2540027	276415	276571	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC1734.14c	cdc2	suc1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	p13	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Hayles J (1986)	16453733	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
349591	2541741	2541978	278235	278463	SPAC20G4.02c	SPAC6G9.12	fus1	cfr1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Cartagena-Lirola H (2006)	16598689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell fusion	double mutants show a severe defect in cell fusion	-	BIOGRID
349595	2541350	2540731	277861	277254	SPBP4H10.11c	SPBC18H10.02	lcf2	lcf1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Fujita Y (2007)	18071249	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
349596	2542632	2540473	279086	277001	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC30D10.10c	cdc25	tor1	sal2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ikeda K (2008)	18235227	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
349597	2542632	2539206	279086	275776	SPAC24H6.05	SPCC24B10.07	cdc25	gad8	sal2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ikeda K (2008)	18235227	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
349598	2542080	5802740	278557	857878	SPAC27D7.03c	SPNCRNA.103	mei2	sme2	-	SPNCRNA.1341	Protein-RNA	physical	Watanabe Y (1994)	7520368	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
349599	2543281	2542632	279708	279086	SPAC23C4.18c	SPAC24H6.05	rad4	cdc25	cut5|dpb11|dre3	sal2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Saka Y (1994)	7957098	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:partial rescue	double mutants show a decreased in the incidence of the cut or early mitosis phenotype	-	BIOGRID
350276	2541337	2541710	277848	278205	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC343.11c	swc2	msc1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Buchanan L (2009)	19911051	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
350277	2541337	3361561	277848	280637	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC11E3.01c	swc2	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Buchanan L (2009)	19911051	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
350278	2541337	2541318	277848	277830	SPBP35G2.13c	SPBP23A10.08	swc2	alp5	-	arp4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Buchanan L (2009)	19911051	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
350279	2541337	2541337	277848	277848	SPBP35G2.13c	SPBP35G2.13c	swc2	swc2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Buchanan L (2009)	19911051	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
350280	2541337	2539564	277848	276125	SPBP35G2.13c	SPCC550.12	swc2	arp6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Buchanan L (2009)	19911051	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
350281	2541337	2540051	277848	276589	SPBP35G2.13c	SPBC32H8.12c	swc2	act1	-	cps8|pi012	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Buchanan L (2009)	19911051	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
350282	2541710	2541710	278205	278205	SPAC343.11c	SPAC343.11c	msc1	msc1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Buchanan L (2009)	19911051	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
350283	2541710	3361561	278205	280637	SPAC343.11c	SPAC11E3.01c	msc1	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Buchanan L (2009)	19911051	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
350284	2541710	2541318	278205	277830	SPAC343.11c	SPBP23A10.08	msc1	alp5	-	arp4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Buchanan L (2009)	19911051	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
350285	2541710	2541337	278205	277848	SPAC343.11c	SPBP35G2.13c	msc1	swc2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Buchanan L (2009)	19911051	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
350286	2541710	2539564	278205	276125	SPAC343.11c	SPCC550.12	msc1	arp6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Buchanan L (2009)	19911051	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
350287	2541710	2540051	278205	276589	SPAC343.11c	SPBC32H8.12c	msc1	act1	-	cps8|pi012	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Buchanan L (2009)	19911051	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
350288	2543027	2539992	279463	276536	SPAC110.03	SPBC1289.04c	cdc42	pob1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Rincon SA (2009)	19710424	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
350289	2543027	2539992	279463	276536	SPAC110.03	SPBC1289.04c	cdc42	pob1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Rincon SA (2009)	19710424	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
350290	2543027	2539992	279463	276536	SPAC110.03	SPBC1289.04c	cdc42	pob1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Rincon SA (2009)	19710424	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
350291	2543027	2539992	279463	276536	SPAC110.03	SPBC1289.04c	cdc42	pob1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Rincon SA (2009)	19710424	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
350292	2541726	2539992	278220	276536	SPAC22H10.07	SPBC1289.04c	scd2	pob1	ral3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Rincon SA (2009)	19710424	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
350293	2539992	2539487	276536	276050	SPBC1289.04c	SPCC895.05	pob1	for3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Rincon SA (2009)	19710424	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
350294	2539992	2539487	276536	276050	SPBC1289.04c	SPCC895.05	pob1	for3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Rincon SA (2009)	19710424	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
350295	3361566	2541318	280642	277830	SPAC29B12.01	SPBP23A10.08	ino80	alp5	SPAC3G6.12	arp4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hogan CJ (2010)	19933844	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
350296	3361566	2541729	280642	278223	SPAC29B12.01	SPAC22H12.02	ino80	tfg3	SPAC3G6.12	taf14	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hogan CJ (2010)	19933844	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
350297	3361566	2541949	280642	278436	SPAC29B12.01	SPAC222.04c	ino80	ies6	SPAC3G6.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hogan CJ (2010)	19933844	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
351308	2539442	2542732	276005	279182	SPCC5E4.04	SPAC25G10.07c	cut1	cut7	ptr4	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Funabiki H (1996)	8978688	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:partial rescue	deletion of cut7 causes mitotic arrest decreasing the amount of cut cells resulting from early mitosis	-	BIOGRID
351309	2539641	2542732	276196	279182	SPBC14C8.01c	SPAC25G10.07c	cut2	cut7	SPBC1815.02c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Funabiki H (1996)	8978688	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:partial rescue	deletion of cut7 causes mitotic arrest decreasing the amount of cut cells resulting from early mitosis	-	BIOGRID
351310	2539442	2539641	276005	276196	SPCC5E4.04	SPBC14C8.01c	cut1	cut2	ptr4	SPBC1815.02c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Funabiki H (1996)	8978688	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
351311	2539442	2539641	276005	276196	SPCC5E4.04	SPBC14C8.01c	cut1	cut2	ptr4	SPBC1815.02c	Co-fractionation	physical	Funabiki H (1996)	8978688	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
351312	2541620	2543544	278117	279961	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC664.07c	rqh1	rad9	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Davey S (1998)	9566891	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:wild type	rad12 mutant cells show an abnormal elongation phenotype that is suppressed by rad9 mutation	-	BIOGRID
351313	2539209	2540719	275779	277242	SPCC23B6.03c	SPBC216.05	tel1	rad3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Naito T (1998)	9771717	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	colony shape|colony size|telomere length|vegetative growth	double mutants show a synergistic decrease in telomere length, slow growth and abnormal colony size and shape	-	BIOGRID
351314	2541413	2540993	277921	277509	SPBPJ4664.06	SPBC342.01c	gpt1	alg6	-	SPBC3F6.06c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Fanchiotti S (1998)	9813085	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
351398	2539196	2543147	275767	279579	SPCC1795.03	SPAC1006.05c	gms1	och1	gmn3	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ohashi T (2010)	19844703	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|metabolism and growth	-	-	BIOGRID
351399	2541089	2541268	277604	277782	SPBC646.09c	SPBP19A11.03c	int6	mts4	yin6	rpn1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sha Z (2009)	19818717	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
351400	2542347	2541268	278812	277782	SPAC1751.03	SPBP19A11.03c	SPAC1751.03	mts4	csn7|csn72|csn7b|SPAC31A2.01	rpn1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sha Z (2009)	19818717	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
351401	2541089	2539387	277604	275952	SPBC646.09c	SPCC1840.03	int6	sal3	yin6	pse1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sha Z (2009)	19818717	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
351402	2539863	2539387	276410	275952	SPBC14F5.03c	SPCC1840.03	kap123	sal3	-	pse1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sha Z (2009)	19818717	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
351403	2541089	2539387	277604	275952	SPBC646.09c	SPCC1840.03	int6	sal3	yin6	pse1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sha Z (2009)	19818717	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
352213	2541011	2540761	277526	277281	SPBC337.14	SPBC21.04	rpb4	med8	-	sep15	Two-hybrid	physical	Mehta S (2009)	19720063	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352214	2541011	2540761	277526	277281	SPBC337.14	SPBC21.04	rpb4	med8	-	sep15	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Mehta S (2009)	19720063	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352215	2541661	2540761	278157	277281	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC21.04	ace2	med8	-	sep15	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mehta S (2009)	19720063	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352216	2540244	2540329	276776	276859	SPBC336.01	SPBC29B5.01	fbh1	atf1	fdh|fdh1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lawrence CL (2009)	19836238	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352217	2543506	2539668	279924	276223	SPAC637.12c	SPBC11B10.10c	mst1	pht1	kat5	pi001	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kim HS (2009)	19915592	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Acetylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352218	2539620	2543650	276178	280064	SPBC1861.01c	SPAC4F10.12	cnp3	fta1	SPBC56F2.13	sma1	Two-hybrid	physical	Tanaka K (2009)	19758558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352219	2539620	3361562	276178	280638	SPBC1861.01c	SPAC11E3.03	cnp3	csm1	SPBC56F2.13	pcs1	Two-hybrid	physical	Tanaka K (2009)	19758558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352220	2539620	2542808	276178	279256	SPBC1861.01c	SPAC15E1.07c	cnp3	moa1	SPBC56F2.13	mug159	Two-hybrid	physical	Tanaka K (2009)	19758558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352221	2543412	2542744	279834	279194	SPAC637.07	SPAC1565.08	moe1	cdc48	-	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Otero JH (2010)	20016281	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352222	2540510	2539817	277038	276367	SPBC2G5.07c	SPBC146.03c	rpc25	cut3	-	smc4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Iwasaki O (2010)	19910488	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352223	2540510	2540071	277038	276609	SPBC2G5.07c	SPBC13E7.10c	rpc25	brf1	-	SPBC30D10.20	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Iwasaki O (2010)	19910488	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352224	2539817	2540246	276367	276778	SPBC146.03c	SPBC336.07	cut3	sfc3	smc4	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Iwasaki O (2010)	19910488	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
352226	2540937	2541558	277453	278057	SPBC359.05	SPAC1F7.08	abc3	fio1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pouliot B (2010)	19915076	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	metabolism and growth|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
352227	2540937	2541557	277453	278056	SPBC359.05	SPAC1F7.07c	abc3	fip1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pouliot B (2010)	19915076	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	metabolism and growth|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
352228	2538959	2539087	275533	275659	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC1259.13	cds1	chk1	-	rad27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Dovey CL (2009)	19819763	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|ionizing radiation resistance|resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
352229	2538846	2543044	275427	279479	SPCC1919.10c	SPAC3C7.12	myo52	tip1	-	noc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Martin-Garcia R (2009)	19808886	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352230	2538846	2542667	275427	279120	SPCC1919.10c	SPAC26A3.16	myo52	dph1	-	ucp5	Two-hybrid	physical	Martin-Garcia R (2009)	19808886	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352231	2543044	2542667	279479	279120	SPAC3C7.12	SPAC26A3.16	tip1	dph1	noc1	ucp5	Two-hybrid	physical	Martin-Garcia R (2009)	19808886	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352232	2538846	2542667	275427	279120	SPCC1919.10c	SPAC26A3.16	myo52	dph1	-	ucp5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Martin-Garcia R (2009)	19808886	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352233	3361306	2538706	280382	275290	SPBC6B1.09c	SPCC338.08	nbs1	ctp1	slr10	mug38|nip1|slr9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Williams RS (2009)	19804755	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352234	2542914	2542393	279356	278857	SPAC57A10.05c	SPAC17G6.12	pof1	cul1	-	pcu1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Schmidt MW (2009)	19748355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352235	2539527	2542393	276089	278857	SPCC338.16	SPAC17G6.12	pof3	cul1	-	pcu1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Schmidt MW (2009)	19748355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352236	2539142	2542393	275714	278857	SPCC1827.08c	SPAC17G6.12	pof7	cul1	SPCC70.11c	pcu1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Schmidt MW (2009)	19748355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352237	2540997	2542393	277513	278857	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC17G6.12	pof9	cul1	-	pcu1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Schmidt MW (2009)	19748355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352238	2539767	2542393	276318	278857	SPBC1703.06	SPAC17G6.12	pof10	cul1	-	pcu1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Schmidt MW (2009)	19748355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352242	2542914	2540917	279356	277433	SPAC57A10.05c	SPBC409.05	pof1	skp1	-	psh1|sph1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Schmidt MW (2009)	19748355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352243	2539527	2540917	276089	277433	SPCC338.16	SPBC409.05	pof3	skp1	-	psh1|sph1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Schmidt MW (2009)	19748355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352244	2539142	2540917	275714	277433	SPCC1827.08c	SPBC409.05	pof7	skp1	SPCC70.11c	psh1|sph1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Schmidt MW (2009)	19748355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352245	2540997	2540917	277513	277433	SPBC3H7.06c	SPBC409.05	pof9	skp1	-	psh1|sph1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Schmidt MW (2009)	19748355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352246	2539767	2540917	276318	277433	SPBC1703.06	SPBC409.05	pof10	skp1	-	psh1|sph1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Schmidt MW (2009)	19748355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352247	2542194	2540917	278669	277433	SPAC17G6.17	SPBC409.05	pof8	skp1	-	psh1|sph1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Schmidt MW (2009)	19748355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352248	2540914	2540917	277430	277433	SPBC56F2.01	SPBC409.05	pof12	skp1	-	psh1|sph1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Schmidt MW (2009)	19748355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352249	2540187	2540917	276720	277433	SPBC1271.01c	SPBC409.05	pof13	skp1	-	psh1|sph1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Schmidt MW (2009)	19748355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352250	2541529	2540917	278029	277433	SPAC1687.13c	SPBC409.05	csn5	skp1	-	psh1|sph1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Schmidt MW (2009)	19748355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
352251	2539659	2539659	276214	276214	SPBC146.13c	SPBC146.13c	myo1	myo1	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352252	2539659	2543589	276214	280004	SPBC146.13c	SPAC4F10.15c	myo1	wsp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352253	2539659	2539513	276214	276075	SPBC146.13c	SPCC645.05c	myo1	myo2	-	rng5	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352254	2539659	2538846	276214	275427	SPBC146.13c	SPCC1919.10c	myo1	myo52	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352255	2539659	2543576	276214	279991	SPBC146.13c	SPAC4A8.05c	myo1	myp2	-	myo3	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352256	2539659	2539580	276214	276139	SPBC146.13c	SPCC645.07	myo1	rgf1	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352257	2539659	2543413	276214	279835	SPBC146.13c	SPAC4F8.12c	myo1	spp42	-	cwf6	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352258	2539659	2540281	276214	276812	SPBC146.13c	SPBC2G2.14	myo1	csi1	-	SPBC2G2.14	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352259	2539659	2542548	276214	279005	SPBC146.13c	SPAC13A11.03	myo1	mcp7	-	mug32|mnd1	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352260	2539659	2543129	276214	279561	SPBC146.13c	SPAC4F8.13c	myo1	rng2	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352261	2539659	2543075	276214	279508	SPBC146.13c	SPAC323.06c	myo1	uba5	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352262	2539513	2539659	276075	276214	SPCC645.05c	SPBC146.13c	myo2	myo1	rng5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352263	2539513	2543129	276075	279561	SPCC645.05c	SPAC4F8.13c	myo2	rng2	rng5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352264	2539513	2543576	276075	279991	SPCC645.05c	SPAC4A8.05c	myo2	myp2	rng5	myo3	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352265	2539513	2539513	276075	276075	SPCC645.05c	SPCC645.05c	myo2	myo2	rng5	rng5	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352266	2539513	2538846	276075	275427	SPCC645.05c	SPCC1919.10c	myo2	myo52	rng5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352267	2543576	2539659	279991	276214	SPAC4A8.05c	SPBC146.13c	myp2	myo1	myo3	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352268	2543576	2543129	279991	279561	SPAC4A8.05c	SPAC4F8.13c	myp2	rng2	myo3	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352269	2543576	2543576	279991	279991	SPAC4A8.05c	SPAC4A8.05c	myp2	myp2	myo3	myo3	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352270	2543576	2539513	279991	276075	SPAC4A8.05c	SPCC645.05c	myp2	myo2	myo3	rng5	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352271	2543576	2538846	279991	275427	SPAC4A8.05c	SPCC1919.10c	myp2	myo52	myo3	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352272	2543576	2542548	279991	279005	SPAC4A8.05c	SPAC13A11.03	myp2	mcp7	myo3	mug32|mnd1	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352273	2540560	2539659	277087	276214	SPBC2D10.14c	SPBC146.13c	myo51	myo1	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352274	2540560	2543129	277087	279561	SPBC2D10.14c	SPAC4F8.13c	myo51	rng2	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352275	2540560	2543576	277087	279991	SPBC2D10.14c	SPAC4A8.05c	myo51	myp2	-	myo3	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352276	2540560	2539513	277087	276075	SPBC2D10.14c	SPCC645.05c	myo51	myo2	-	rng5	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352277	2540560	2538846	277087	275427	SPBC2D10.14c	SPCC1919.10c	myo51	myo52	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352278	2538846	2539659	275427	276214	SPCC1919.10c	SPBC146.13c	myo52	myo1	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352279	2538846	2543129	275427	279561	SPCC1919.10c	SPAC4F8.13c	myo52	rng2	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352280	2538846	2543576	275427	279991	SPCC1919.10c	SPAC4A8.05c	myo52	myp2	-	myo3	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352281	2538846	2539513	275427	276075	SPCC1919.10c	SPCC645.05c	myo52	myo2	-	rng5	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352282	2538846	2538846	275427	275427	SPCC1919.10c	SPCC1919.10c	myo52	myo52	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352283	2543589	2539659	280004	276214	SPAC4F10.15c	SPBC146.13c	wsp1	myo1	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352284	2543589	2543589	280004	280004	SPAC4F10.15c	SPAC4F10.15c	wsp1	wsp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
352285	2543589	2542665	280004	279118	SPAC4F10.15c	SPAC10F6.08c	wsp1	nht10	-	nht1	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mata J (2010)	19805578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
353861	2540019	2540919	276563	277435	SPBC1685.01	SPBC543.07	pmp1	pek1	dsp1	mkk1|skh1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Sugiura R (2003)	12931193	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionic stress resistance:undetermined|viability:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
353862	2539434	2540919	275997	277435	SPCC757.09c	SPBC543.07	rnc1	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Sugiura R (2003)	12931193	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionic stress resistance:undetermined|viability:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
353890	2541124	2543583	277639	279998	SPBC646.02	SPAC644.12	cwf11	cdc5	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ohi MD (2002)	11884590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
353926	2538959	2539087	275533	275659	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC1259.13	cds1	chk1	-	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi E (2003)	14560029	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
353927	2540728	2540992	277251	277508	SPBC216.06c	SPBC342.05	swi1	crb2	-	rhp9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi E (2003)	14560029	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
353928	2540728	2539087	277251	275659	SPBC216.06c	SPCC1259.13	swi1	chk1	-	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi E (2003)	14560029	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
353947	2542007	2540574	278490	277101	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC409.03	rad57	swi5	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Roseaulin L (2008)	18388861	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
353948	2541635	2540348	278131	276877	SPAC1556.01c	SPBC29A10.05	rad50	exo1	SPAP4C9.01c	mut2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Roseaulin L (2008)	18388861	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
353949	2539004	2540887	275578	277404	SPCC4G3.05c	SPBC4F6.15c	mus81	swi10	slx3	rad23	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Roseaulin L (2008)	18388861	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
353950	2540719	2539209	277242	275779	SPBC216.05	SPCC23B6.03c	rad3	tel1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Xu YJ (2006)	16618806	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	-	-	BIOGRID
353972	2539869	2541982	276415	278467	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC23A1.06c	cdc2	cmk2	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	mkp2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Alemany V (2002)	12135745	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in G2 phase:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
354039	2539149	2541059	275721	277574	SPCC1739.11c	SPBC557.03c	cdc11	pim1	-	dcd1|ptr2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Salus SS (2002)	12446769	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology	-	-	BIOGRID
354040	2541940	2541059	278427	277574	SPAC27F1.02c	SPBC557.03c	cdc8	pim1	fus4	dcd1|ptr2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Salus SS (2002)	12446769	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology	-	-	BIOGRID
354073	2543327	2541051	279750	277566	SPAC1D4.06c	SPBC3E7.08c	csk1	rad13	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gerber HB (2008)	18231579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
354075	2543327	2542749	279750	279199	SPAC1D4.06c	SPAC15A10.03c	csk1	rad54	-	rhp54	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Gerber HB (2008)	18231579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	-	-	BIOGRID
354076	2543327	2543580	279750	279995	SPAC1D4.06c	SPAC644.14c	csk1	rad51	-	rhp51	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gerber HB (2008)	18231579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
354077	2543327	2542749	279750	279199	SPAC1D4.06c	SPAC15A10.03c	csk1	rad54	-	rhp54	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gerber HB (2008)	18231579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
354078	2543327	2540584	279750	277110	SPAC1D4.06c	SPBC28F2.07	csk1	sfr1	-	dds20|mug13	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gerber HB (2008)	18231579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
354079	2543577	2543327	279992	279750	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC1D4.06c	srs2	csk1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gerber HB (2008)	18231579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
354120	2543629	2541643	280043	278139	SPAC3H5.06c	SPAC14C4.13	pol1	rad17	polA|swi7	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kai M (2003)	12514100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
354121	2543629	2538959	280043	275533	SPAC3H5.06c	SPCC18B5.11c	pol1	cds1	polA|swi7	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kai M (2003)	12514100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
354122	2543629	2538959	280043	275533	SPAC3H5.06c	SPCC18B5.11c	pol1	cds1	polA|swi7	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kai M (2003)	12514100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency	-	-	BIOGRID
354166	2539499	2542226	276062	278699	SPCC622.08c	SPAC19G12.06c	hta1	hta2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nakamura TM (2004)	15226425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	-	-	BIOGRID
354167	2543086	2542226	279519	278699	SPAC30D11.10	SPAC19G12.06c	rad52	hta2	rad22|rad22A	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakamura TM (2004)	15226425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
354168	2543086	2539499	279519	276062	SPAC30D11.10	SPCC622.08c	rad52	hta1	rad22|rad22A	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakamura TM (2004)	15226425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
354169	2539090	2542226	275662	278699	SPCC126.02c	SPAC19G12.06c	pku70	hta2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakamura TM (2004)	15226425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
354170	2539090	2539499	275662	276062	SPCC126.02c	SPCC622.08c	pku70	hta1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakamura TM (2004)	15226425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
354171	2539042	2539499	275615	276062	SPCC1183.05c	SPCC622.08c	lig4	hta1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakamura TM (2004)	15226425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
354172	2539042	2542226	275615	278699	SPCC1183.05c	SPAC19G12.06c	lig4	hta2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakamura TM (2004)	15226425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
354173	2541620	2539499	278117	276062	SPAC2G11.12	SPCC622.08c	rqh1	hta1	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakamura TM (2004)	15226425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
354174	2541620	2542226	278117	278699	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC19G12.06c	rqh1	hta2	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakamura TM (2004)	15226425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
354175	2543580	2539499	279995	276062	SPAC644.14c	SPCC622.08c	rad51	hta1	rhp51	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakamura TM (2004)	15226425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
354176	2543580	2542226	279995	278699	SPAC644.14c	SPAC19G12.06c	rad51	hta2	rhp51	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakamura TM (2004)	15226425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
354177	2542757	2539499	279207	276062	SPAC13C5.07	SPCC622.08c	mre11	hta1	rad32	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakamura TM (2004)	15226425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
354178	2542757	2542226	279207	278699	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC19G12.06c	mre11	hta2	rad32	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakamura TM (2004)	15226425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
354179	2539087	2542226	275659	278699	SPCC1259.13	SPAC19G12.06c	chk1	hta2	rad27	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nakamura TM (2004)	15226425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	-	-	BIOGRID
354180	2539087	2539499	275659	276062	SPCC1259.13	SPCC622.08c	chk1	hta1	rad27	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nakamura TM (2004)	15226425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	-	-	BIOGRID
354215	2543605	2543283	280020	279709	SPAC4F10.02	SPAC6C3.04	aap1	cit1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lee S (2009)	20044953	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	No Modification	-	Chaperone activity	-	BIOGRID
354338	947364	2541402	851687	277911	b3187	SPBPJ4664.01	ispB	dps1	ECK3176|JW3154|cel|yhbD	SPBPJ694.01|dps	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Cui TZ (2010)	20051244	511145	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
354339	947364	2542608	851687	279062	b3187	SPAC19G12.12	ispB	dlp1	ECK3176|JW3154|cel|yhbD	coq1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Cui TZ (2010)	20051244	511145	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
354370	2542724	2540159	279175	276694	SPAC767.01c	SPBC12C2.08	vps1	dnm1	SPAC9G1.14c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mikawa T (2010)	20070859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitochondrial morphology|oxidative stress resistance	-	-	BIOGRID
354371	2542724	2539461	279175	276024	SPAC767.01c	SPCC63.08c	vps1	atg1	SPAC9G1.14c	cvt10|ppk36	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mikawa T (2010)	20070859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
354372	2542724	3361214	279175	280290	SPAC767.01c	SPBC31E1.01c	vps1	atg2	SPAC9G1.14c	SPBC660.18c|mug36	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mikawa T (2010)	20070859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
354373	2542724	2542182	279175	278657	SPAC767.01c	SPAC19B12.08	vps1	atg4	SPAC9G1.14c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mikawa T (2010)	20070859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
354374	2542724	2540790	279175	277309	SPAC767.01c	SPBC6B1.05c	vps1	atg7	SPAC9G1.14c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mikawa T (2010)	20070859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
354375	2542724	2541386	279175	277897	SPAC767.01c	SPBP8B7.24c	vps1	atg8	SPAC9G1.14c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mikawa T (2010)	20070859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
354376	2541386	2542724	277897	279175	SPBP8B7.24c	SPAC767.01c	atg8	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mikawa T (2010)	20070859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vacuolar morphology:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
422887	2541455	2539352	277958	275918	SPAC6G9.06c	SPCC188.07	pcp1	ccq1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Flory MR (2004)	15546621	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
425322	2541714	2539455	278209	276018	SPAC30.03c	SPCC736.09c	tsn1	SPCC736.09c	mug90|tsn	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Eliahoo E (2010)	20081200	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
425323	2539455	2541714	276018	278209	SPCC736.09c	SPAC30.03c	SPCC736.09c	tsn1	-	mug90|tsn	Two-hybrid	physical	Eliahoo E (2010)	20081200	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
425324	2541714	2539455	278209	276018	SPAC30.03c	SPCC736.09c	tsn1	SPCC736.09c	mug90|tsn	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Eliahoo E (2010)	20081200	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
425325	2541714	2541714	278209	278209	SPAC30.03c	SPAC30.03c	tsn1	tsn1	mug90|tsn	mug90|tsn	Two-hybrid	physical	Eliahoo E (2010)	20081200	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
425333	2541633	2541858	278129	278348	SPAC664.01c	SPAC23H4.12	swi6	alp13	SPAC824.10c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kim HS (2008)	18252195	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
425334	2542070	2541633	278547	278129	SPAC29B12.02c	SPAC664.01c	set2	swi6	kmt3	SPAC824.10c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kim HS (2008)	18252195	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
425335	2540825	2542070	277343	278547	SPBC428.08c	SPAC29B12.02c	clr4	set2	-	kmt3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kim HS (2008)	18252195	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
425490	2541051	2540345	277566	276874	SPBC3E7.08c	SPBC19C7.09c	rad13	uve1	-	uvde	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Lombaerts M (1999)	10446227	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
425491	2540345	2541051	276874	277566	SPBC19C7.09c	SPBC3E7.08c	uve1	rad13	uvde	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Lombaerts M (1999)	10446227	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
425703	2542682	2542175	279135	278650	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC1F3.02c	rga2	mkh1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Villar-Tajadura MA (2008)	18793338	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
425704	2542682	2542773	279135	279222	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC16.01	rga2	rho2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Villar-Tajadura MA (2008)	18793338	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
425705	2539007	2542682	275580	279135	SPCC1281.01	SPAC26A3.09c	ags1	rga2	SPCC17A7.01|SPCC338.01c|mok1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Villar-Tajadura MA (2008)	18793338	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
425712	2539627	2538959	276184	275533	SPBC1734.02c	SPCC18B5.11c	cdc27	cds1	SPBC337.18c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Win TZ (2006)	16738311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
425713	2539627	2539087	276184	275659	SPBC1734.02c	SPCC1259.13	cdc27	chk1	SPBC337.18c	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Win TZ (2006)	16738311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
425714	2539627	2542558	276184	279014	SPBC1734.02c	SPAC1952.07	cdc27	rad1	SPBC337.18c	rad19	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Win TZ (2006)	16738311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
425715	2539423	2540582	275988	277108	SPCC663.12	SPBC26H8.07c	cid12	nda3	-	alp12|ben1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Win TZ (2006)	16738311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
425720	2539869	2540880	276415	277397	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC582.03	cdc2	cdc13	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Liu HY (2002)	11711540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
425721	2539869	2539087	276415	275659	SPBC11B10.09	SPCC1259.13	cdc2	chk1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	rad27	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Liu HY (2002)	11711540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
425767	2541165	2539399	277680	275964	SPBC776.12c	SPCC550.13	hsk1	dfp1	cdc7	him1|rad35|dbf4	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Takeda T (2001)	11359920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
425800	10714	2540020	115940	276564	-	SPBC16D10.09	POLD3	pcn1	P66|P68|PPP1R128	pcn	Two-hybrid	physical	Pohler JR (2005)	16000169	9606	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
425829	2540341	3361406	276870	280482	SPBC2F12.11c	SPAC19E9.03	rep2	pas1	-	SPAC57A10.01	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tanaka K (2000)	10982385	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
425830	2540341	2541871	276870	278361	SPBC2F12.11c	SPAC22F3.09c	rep2	res2	-	mcs1|pct1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tanaka K (2000)	10982385	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
425831	2541755	3361406	278249	280482	SPAC2F7.11	SPAC19E9.03	nrd1	pas1	msa2	SPAC57A10.01	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tanaka K (2000)	10982385	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency	-	-	BIOGRID
425832	2539433	2543481	275996	279901	SPCC4E9.02	SPAPB2B4.03	cig1	cig2	SPCC645.01	cyc17	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tanaka K (2000)	10982385	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|mating efficiency	CIG1/CIG2/PUC1/PAS1 quadruple mutants are synthetic lethal	-	BIOGRID
425833	2539433	2540654	275996	277179	SPCC4E9.02	SPBC19F5.01c	cig1	puc1	SPCC645.01	SPBP8B7.32c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tanaka K (2000)	10982385	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|mating efficiency	CIG1/CIG2/PUC1/PAS1 quadruple mutants are synthetic lethal	-	BIOGRID
425834	2539433	3361406	275996	280482	SPCC4E9.02	SPAC19E9.03	cig1	pas1	SPCC645.01	SPAC57A10.01	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tanaka K (2000)	10982385	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|mating efficiency	CIG1/CIG2/PUC1/PAS1 quadruple mutants are synthetic lethal	-	BIOGRID
425835	2543481	2540654	279901	277179	SPAPB2B4.03	SPBC19F5.01c	cig2	puc1	cyc17	SPBP8B7.32c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tanaka K (2000)	10982385	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|mating efficiency	CIG1/CIG2/PUC1/PAS1 quadruple mutants are synthetic lethal	-	BIOGRID
425836	2543481	3361406	279901	280482	SPAPB2B4.03	SPAC19E9.03	cig2	pas1	cyc17	SPAC57A10.01	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tanaka K (2000)	10982385	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|mating efficiency	CIG1/CIG2/PUC1/PAS1 quadruple mutants are synthetic lethal	-	BIOGRID
425837	2540654	3361406	277179	280482	SPBC19F5.01c	SPAC19E9.03	puc1	pas1	SPBP8B7.32c	SPAC57A10.01	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tanaka K (2000)	10982385	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|mating efficiency	CIG1/CIG2/PUC1/PAS1 quadruple mutants are synthetic lethal	-	BIOGRID
425855	2542285	2539997	278753	276541	SPAC17H9.09c	SPBC1604.14c	ras1	shk1	ste5	orb2|pak1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Marcus S (1995)	7597098	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sexual cycle:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
425862	2542805	2543129	279253	279561	SPAC15A10.08	SPAC4F8.13c	ain1	rng2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wu JQ (2001)	11294907	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
425863	2542805	2539765	279253	276316	SPAC15A10.08	SPBC1778.06c	ain1	fim1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Wu JQ (2001)	11294907	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology	-	-	BIOGRID
425864	2540494	2538758	277022	275341	SPBC409.04c	SPCC1739.12	mis12	ppe1	-	esp1|ppx1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Goshima G (2003)	12773390	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
425865	2540494	2539511	277022	276073	SPBC409.04c	SPCC663.01c	mis12	ekc1	-	SPCC777.16c|eck1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Goshima G (2003)	12773390	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
425873	2539123	2539869	275695	276415	SPCC18B5.03	SPBC11B10.09	wee1	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Novak B (1986)	3116001	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chemical compound excretion	carbon dioxide	-	BIOGRID
426398	3361330	2541071	280406	277586	SPBC20F10.04c	SPBC582.05c	nse4	brc1	rad62	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Morikawa H (2004)	15485909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
426399	3361330	2540802	280406	277321	SPBC20F10.04c	SPBC1921.02	nse4	rad60	rad62	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Morikawa H (2004)	15485909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
426400	2540802	2541071	277321	277586	SPBC1921.02	SPBC582.05c	rad60	brc1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Morikawa H (2004)	15485909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
426401	2541071	2539020	277586	275593	SPBC582.05c	SPCC5E4.06	brc1	smc6	-	rad18	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Morikawa H (2004)	15485909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
426402	2540802	2539020	277321	275593	SPBC1921.02	SPCC5E4.06	rad60	smc6	-	rad18	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Morikawa H (2004)	15485909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
426403	2540802	3361330	277321	280406	SPBC1921.02	SPBC20F10.04c	rad60	nse4	-	rad62	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Morikawa H (2004)	15485909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance:undetermined|resistance to chemicals:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
426404	2541071	3361330	277586	280406	SPBC582.05c	SPBC20F10.04c	brc1	nse4	-	rad62	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Morikawa H (2004)	15485909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance:undetermined|resistance to chemicals:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
426405	2541071	2540802	277586	277321	SPBC582.05c	SPBC1921.02	brc1	rad60	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Morikawa H (2004)	15485909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance:undetermined|resistance to chemicals:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
426406	2541071	2539020	277586	275593	SPBC582.05c	SPCC5E4.06	brc1	smc6	-	rad18	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Morikawa H (2004)	15485909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance:undetermined|resistance to chemicals:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
426407	2540802	2539020	277321	275593	SPBC1921.02	SPCC5E4.06	rad60	smc6	-	rad18	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Morikawa H (2004)	15485909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance:undetermined|resistance to chemicals:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
426645	2538959	2540589	275533	277115	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC20F10.06	cds1	mad2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sugimoto I (2004)	15347659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
426662	2543501	2539332	279919	275898	SPAC664.14	SPCPB1C11.01	amt2	amt1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mitsuzawa H (2006)	16999738	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient uptake|vegetative growth	double mutants are unable to take up ammonium correctly and cannot grow on media with low ammonia levels	-	BIOGRID
426663	2543501	2541795	279919	278286	SPAC664.14	SPAC2E1P3.02c	amt2	amt3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mitsuzawa H (2006)	16999738	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient uptake|vegetative growth	double mutants are unable to take up ammonia from their environment and die on media with low ammonia levels	-	BIOGRID
426669	2541592	2540557	278089	277084	SPAC6F12.15c	SPBC29A10.04	cut9	psm1	dre1	smc1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bernard P (2006)	16682348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
426670	2541592	2542387	278089	278851	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC17H9.20	cut9	psc3	dre1	SPAC607.01	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bernard P (2006)	16682348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
426761	2541055	2541982	277570	278467	SPBC409.07c	SPAC23A1.06c	wis1	cmk2	smf2|spc2	mkp2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sanchez-Piris M (2002)	11886858	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
426774	2541120	2543164	277635	279595	SPBC649.03	SPAC3G6.06c	rhp14	rad2	-	fen1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Hohl M (2001)	11408483	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
426801	2539041	2543289	275614	279714	SPCC18.06c	SPAC9E9.08	caf1	rad26	pop2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Takahashi S (2007)	17264117	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
426802	2539041	2538959	275614	275533	SPCC18.06c	SPCC18B5.11c	caf1	cds1	pop2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Takahashi S (2007)	17264117	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
426955	2543048	3361385	279483	280461	SPAC3F10.02c	SPAC1639.02c	trk1	trk2	sptrk	SPAC1F5.12	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Calero F (2000)	10629185	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient utilization|vegetative growth	in medium with low potassium chloride	-	BIOGRID
426968	2539869	2541443	276415	277948	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC11E3.09	cdc2	pyp3	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Millar JB (1992)	1464318	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
427039	2543237	2541051	279665	277566	SPAC6B12.02c	SPBC3E7.08c	mus7	rad13	mms22	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yokoyama M (2007)	17307401	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427040	2543237	2540032	279665	276575	SPAC6B12.02c	SPBC1703.14c	mus7	top1	mms22	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Yokoyama M (2007)	17307401	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
427041	2539004	2540032	275578	276575	SPCC4G3.05c	SPBC1703.14c	mus81	top1	slx3	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Yokoyama M (2007)	17307401	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
427042	2543237	2543086	279665	279519	SPAC6B12.02c	SPAC30D11.10	mus7	rad52	mms22	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yokoyama M (2007)	17307401	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427043	2543237	2539004	279665	275578	SPAC6B12.02c	SPCC4G3.05c	mus7	mus81	mms22	slx3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yokoyama M (2007)	17307401	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427044	2543237	2541620	279665	278117	SPAC6B12.02c	SPAC2G11.12	mus7	rqh1	mms22	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yokoyama M (2007)	17307401	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427051	2540589	2539219	277115	275789	SPBC20F10.06	SPCC1795.01c	mad2	mad3	-	SPCC895.02	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Millband DN (2002)	11909965	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
427701	2543449	2540895	279869	277411	SPAPB1A10.02	SPBC577.15c	scm3	sim3	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|silencing:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
427702	2543449	2540804	279869	277323	SPAPB1A10.02	SPBC18E5.03c	scm3	sim4	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|silencing:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
427703	2543449	2542304	279869	278771	SPAPB1A10.02	SPAC1687.20c	scm3	mis6	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|silencing:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
427704	2539658	2543449	276213	279869	SPBC1105.17	SPAPB1A10.02	cnp1	scm3	sim2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|silencing:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
427705	2539658	2540895	276213	277411	SPBC1105.17	SPBC577.15c	cnp1	sim3	sim2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|silencing:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
427706	2539658	2540804	276213	277323	SPBC1105.17	SPBC18E5.03c	cnp1	sim4	sim2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|silencing:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
427707	2539658	2542304	276213	278771	SPBC1105.17	SPAC1687.20c	cnp1	mis6	sim2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|silencing:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
427708	2540895	2540804	277411	277323	SPBC577.15c	SPBC18E5.03c	sim3	sim4	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|silencing:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
427709	2540895	2542304	277411	278771	SPBC577.15c	SPAC1687.20c	sim3	mis6	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|silencing:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
427710	2542304	2543449	278771	279869	SPAC1687.20c	SPAPB1A10.02	mis6	scm3	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|silencing:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
427711	2543449	2539658	279869	276213	SPAPB1A10.02	SPBC1105.17	scm3	cnp1	-	sim2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
427712	2540895	2543449	277411	279869	SPBC577.15c	SPAPB1A10.02	sim3	scm3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
427713	2540895	2539658	277411	276213	SPBC577.15c	SPBC1105.17	sim3	cnp1	-	sim2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
427714	2540804	2543449	277323	279869	SPBC18E5.03c	SPAPB1A10.02	sim4	scm3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
427715	2540804	2540895	277323	277411	SPBC18E5.03c	SPBC577.15c	sim4	sim3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
427716	2542737	2540895	279187	277411	SPAC25B8.14	SPBC577.15c	mal2	sim3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
427717	2542304	2543449	278771	279869	SPAC1687.20c	SPAPB1A10.02	mis6	scm3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427718	2540494	2543449	277022	279869	SPBC409.04c	SPAPB1A10.02	mis12	scm3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427719	2540494	2539658	277022	276213	SPBC409.04c	SPBC1105.17	mis12	cnp1	-	sim2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427720	2540494	2540895	277022	277411	SPBC409.04c	SPBC577.15c	mis12	sim3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427721	2540494	2540804	277022	277323	SPBC409.04c	SPBC18E5.03c	mis12	sim4	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427722	2542737	2543449	279187	279869	SPAC25B8.14	SPAPB1A10.02	mal2	scm3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427723	2542737	2539658	279187	276213	SPAC25B8.14	SPBC1105.17	mal2	cnp1	-	sim2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427724	2542737	2540804	279187	277323	SPAC25B8.14	SPBC18E5.03c	mal2	sim4	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427725	2540582	2543449	277108	279869	SPBC26H8.07c	SPAPB1A10.02	nda3	scm3	alp12|ben1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427726	2540582	2539658	277108	276213	SPBC26H8.07c	SPBC1105.17	nda3	cnp1	alp12|ben1	sim2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427727	2540582	2540895	277108	277411	SPBC26H8.07c	SPBC577.15c	nda3	sim3	alp12|ben1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427728	2540582	2540804	277108	277323	SPBC26H8.07c	SPBC18E5.03c	nda3	sim4	alp12|ben1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427729	2539050	2543449	275623	279869	SPCC11E10.08	SPAPB1A10.02	rik1	scm3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427730	2539050	2540804	275623	277323	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC18E5.03c	rik1	sim4	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427731	2539050	2542304	275623	278771	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC1687.20c	rik1	mis6	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427732	2538736	2543449	275320	279869	SPCC1322.12c	SPAPB1A10.02	bub1	scm3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427733	2538736	2540895	275320	277411	SPCC1322.12c	SPBC577.15c	bub1	sim3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427734	2541856	2540895	278347	277411	SPAC23H3.08c	SPBC577.15c	bub3	sim3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427735	2540589	2540804	277115	277323	SPBC20F10.06	SPBC18E5.03c	mad2	sim4	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pidoux AL (2003)	12719471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427792	2542313	2542313	278779	278779	SPAC16A10.07c	SPAC16A10.07c	taz1	taz1	myb|myb1	myb|myb1	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Gunisova S (2010)	20074552	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Truncated Taz1p forms filaments that can be visualized by EM.	-	BIOGRID
427793	2543506	2540620	279924	277146	SPAC637.12c	SPBC4.04c	mst1	mcm2	kat5	cdc19|nda1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gomez EB (2008)	18505873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427794	2543506	2539164	279924	275735	SPAC637.12c	SPCC16A11.17	mst1	mcm4	kat5	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gomez EB (2008)	18505873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427795	2543506	2540630	279924	277156	SPAC637.12c	SPBC25D12.03c	mst1	mcm7	kat5	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gomez EB (2008)	18505873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427796	2543506	2540470	279924	276998	SPAC637.12c	SPBC29A10.15	mst1	orc1	kat5	cdc30|orp1|rid1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gomez EB (2008)	18505873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427797	2543506	2543629	279924	280043	SPAC637.12c	SPAC3H5.06c	mst1	pol1	kat5	polA|swi7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gomez EB (2008)	18505873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427798	2543506	2541165	279924	277680	SPAC637.12c	SPBC776.12c	mst1	hsk1	kat5	cdc7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gomez EB (2008)	18505873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427799	2543506	2541635	279924	278131	SPAC637.12c	SPAC1556.01c	mst1	rad50	kat5	SPAP4C9.01c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gomez EB (2008)	18505873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427800	2543506	2543580	279924	279995	SPAC637.12c	SPAC644.14c	mst1	rad51	kat5	rhp51	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gomez EB (2008)	18505873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427801	2543506	2540821	279924	277339	SPAC637.12c	SPBC800.03	mst1	clr3	kat5	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gomez EB (2008)	18505873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427802	2543506	2540825	279924	277343	SPAC637.12c	SPBC428.08c	mst1	clr4	kat5	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gomez EB (2008)	18505873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427803	2543506	2541633	279924	278129	SPAC637.12c	SPAC664.01c	mst1	swi6	kat5	SPAC824.10c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gomez EB (2008)	18505873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427807	2543204	2540719	279633	277242	SPAC821.04c	SPBC216.05	cid13	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Read RL (2002)	12218190	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
427810	2539805	2540825	276355	277343	SPBC146.09c	SPBC428.08c	lsd1	clr4	saf110|swm1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Lan F (2007)	17434129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
427811	2539805	2538762	276355	275345	SPBC146.09c	SPCC306.04c	lsd1	set1	saf110|swm1	kmt2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Lan F (2007)	17434129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
427812	2539805	2542070	276355	278547	SPBC146.09c	SPAC29B12.02c	lsd1	set2	saf110|swm1	kmt3	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Lan F (2007)	17434129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
427813	2539805	2539545	276355	276106	SPBC146.09c	SPCC4B3.12	lsd1	set9	saf110|swm1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Lan F (2007)	17434129	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
427814	2540885	2539123	277402	275695	SPBC660.14	SPCC18B5.03	mik1	wee1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tournier S (2000)	11029045	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427815	2542632	2541871	279086	278361	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC22F3.09c	cdc25	res2	sal2	mcs1|pct1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tournier S (2000)	11029045	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427817	2540389	2540707	276917	277230	SPBC31E1.03	SPBC19C2.01	hub1	cdc28	ubl4	prp8|SPBC21B10.01c|SPBC874.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wilkinson CR (2004)	15620657	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427818	2540389	2543583	276917	279998	SPBC31E1.03	SPAC644.12	hub1	cdc5	ubl4	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wilkinson CR (2004)	15620657	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
427864	3361538	2539920	280614	276464	SPAC1705.03c	SPBC119.08	ecm33	pmk1	SPAC23H4.19|SPAC1F2.01	spm1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Takada H (2010)	20032302	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionic stress resistance:partial rescue	MgCl2, CaCl2	-	BIOGRID
427865	3361538	2539920	280614	276464	SPAC1705.03c	SPBC119.08	ecm33	pmk1	SPAC23H4.19|SPAC1F2.01	spm1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Takada H (2010)	20032302	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:partial rescue|cell size:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
427866	2540024	3361538	276568	280614	SPBP4H10.04	SPAC1705.03c	ppb1	ecm33	SPBC1346.01c	SPAC23H4.19|SPAC1F2.01	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Takada H (2010)	20032302	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionic stress resistance:partial rescue	MgCl2	-	BIOGRID
427870	2543576	2540176	279991	276709	SPAC4A8.05c	SPBC1709.01	myp2	chs2	myo3	SPBC1734.17	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Martin-Garcia R (2006)	16772338	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	MYO2/MYO3/CHS2 tripe mutant is synthetic lethal|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
427871	2539513	2540176	276075	276709	SPCC645.05c	SPBC1709.01	myo2	chs2	rng5	SPBC1734.17	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Martin-Garcia R (2006)	16772338	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	MYO2/MYO3/CHS2 tripe mutant is synthetic lethal|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
427872	2539513	2543576	276075	279991	SPCC645.05c	SPAC4A8.05c	myo2	myp2	rng5	myo3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Martin-Garcia R (2006)	16772338	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	MYO2/MYO3/CHS2 tripe mutant is synthetic lethal|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
427886	2543027	2541468	279463	277970	SPAC110.03	SPAC1F5.09c	cdc42	shk2	-	pak2	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Yang P (1998)	9660817	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
427887	2542285	2541468	278753	277970	SPAC17H9.09c	SPAC1F5.09c	ras1	shk2	ste5	pak2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yang P (1998)	9660817	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
427888	2539997	2541468	276541	277970	SPBC1604.14c	SPAC1F5.09c	shk1	shk2	orb2|pak1	pak2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yang P (1998)	9660817	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency	SHK1 deleted cells overexpressing SHK2 exhibit a mating defect	-	BIOGRID
427889	2539997	2540612	276541	277138	SPBC1604.14c	SPBC1D7.05	shk1	byr2	orb2|pak1	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yang P (1998)	9660817	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:wild type	Overexpression of BYR2 abolishes the mating defect seen when SHK1 deleted cells overexpress SHK2	-	BIOGRID
427890	2541468	2540612	277970	277138	SPAC1F5.09c	SPBC1D7.05	shk2	byr2	pak2	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yang P (1998)	9660817	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:wild type	Overexpression of BYR2 abolishes the mating defect seen when SHK1 deleted cells overexpress SHK2	-	BIOGRID
427891	2543027	2541468	279463	277970	SPAC110.03	SPAC1F5.09c	cdc42	shk2	-	pak2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yang P (1998)	9660817	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
428400	2543407	2543027	279829	279463	SPAC8F11.07c	SPAC110.03	cdc24	cdc42	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Murray JM (2000)	10628977	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
428790	2543222	2539123	279650	275695	SPAC821.08c	SPCC18B5.03	slp1	wee1	cdc20	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Matsumoto T (1997)	9001228	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
428813	2539641	2539087	276196	275659	SPBC14C8.01c	SPCC1259.13	cut2	chk1	SPBC1815.02c	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nagao K (2004)	15329725	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
428814	2539641	2541051	276196	277566	SPBC14C8.01c	SPBC3E7.08c	cut2	rad13	SPBC1815.02c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nagao K (2004)	15329725	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
428815	2539641	2540992	276196	277508	SPBC14C8.01c	SPBC342.05	cut2	crb2	SPBC1815.02c	rhp9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nagao K (2004)	15329725	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
428817	2540690	2539309	277215	275876	SPBC428.20c	SPCC4G3.19	alp6	alp16	SPBC902.01c	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Fujita A (2002)	12134075	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
428818	2540392	2539309	276920	275876	SPBC365.15	SPCC4G3.19	alp4	alp16	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Fujita A (2002)	12134075	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
428855	2539433	2543481	275996	279901	SPCC4E9.02	SPAPB2B4.03	cig1	cig2	SPCC645.01	cyc17	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Martin-Castellanos C (2000)	10679013	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	CIG1/CIG2/PUC1 triple mutants show aberrant persistence of the protein RUM1	-	BIOGRID
428856	2539433	2540654	275996	277179	SPCC4E9.02	SPBC19F5.01c	cig1	puc1	SPCC645.01	SPBP8B7.32c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Martin-Castellanos C (2000)	10679013	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	CIG1/CIG2/PUC1 triple mutants show aberrant persistence of the protein RUM1	-	BIOGRID
428857	2543481	2540654	279901	277179	SPAPB2B4.03	SPBC19F5.01c	cig2	puc1	cyc17	SPBP8B7.32c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Martin-Castellanos C (2000)	10679013	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	CIG1/CIG2/PUC1 triple mutants show aberrant persistence of the protein RUM1	-	BIOGRID
428858	2539433	2539640	275996	276195	SPCC4E9.02	SPBC32F12.09	cig1	rum1	SPCC645.01	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Martin-Castellanos C (2000)	10679013	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue	The cell cycle defect seen in CIG1/CIG2/PUC1 triple mutants can be rescued by deletion of RUM1	-	BIOGRID
428886	2539087	2542632	275659	279086	SPCC1259.13	SPAC24H6.05	chk1	cdc25	rad27	sal2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Walworth N (1993)	8497322	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
428887	2542558	2539087	279014	275659	SPAC1952.07	SPCC1259.13	rad1	chk1	rad19	rad27	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Walworth N (1993)	8497322	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
428890	2539149	2542162	275721	278638	SPCC1739.11c	SPAC6F6.08c	cdc11	cdc16	-	bub2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Marks J (1992)	1527180	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
428891	2539149	2541975	275721	278460	SPCC1739.11c	SPAC20G8.05c	cdc11	cdc15	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Marks J (1992)	1527180	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
428892	2540624	2541975	277150	278460	SPBC24C6.07	SPAC20G8.05c	cdc14	cdc15	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Marks J (1992)	1527180	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
428893	2540660	2541975	277185	278460	SPBC21.06c	SPAC20G8.05c	cdc7	cdc15	its10|pld1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Marks J (1992)	1527180	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
428894	2541975	2542162	278460	278638	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC6F6.08c	cdc15	cdc16	-	bub2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Marks J (1992)	1527180	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
428895	2539149	2540660	275721	277185	SPCC1739.11c	SPBC21.06c	cdc11	cdc7	-	its10|pld1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Marks J (1992)	1527180	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
429266	3361460	2543578	280536	279993	SPAC17A2.01	SPAC9.10	bsu1	thi9	SPAC1B1.05|car1|sod1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Vogl C (2008)	18201975	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutant shows increased sensitivity to thiamine	-	BIOGRID
429375	2541635	2540348	278131	276877	SPAC1556.01c	SPBC29A10.05	rad50	exo1	SPAP4C9.01c	mut2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tomita K (2003)	12861005	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	gamma ray resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
429431	2541592	2541117	278089	277632	SPAC6F12.15c	SPBC646.13	cut9	sds23	dre1	moc1|psp1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ishii K (1996)	8978689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
429432	2541117	2539179	277632	275750	SPBC646.13	SPCC31H12.05c	sds23	sds21	moc1|psp1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ishii K (1996)	8978689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
429433	2541117	2541592	277632	278089	SPBC646.13	SPAC6F12.15c	sds23	cut9	moc1|psp1	dre1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ishii K (1996)	8978689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
429434	2541117	2542438	277632	278900	SPBC646.13	SPAC17C9.01c	sds23	nuc2	moc1|psp1	SPAC1851.01|apc3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ishii K (1996)	8978689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
429445	2542358	2541818	278823	278309	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC11G7.02	clp1	pub1	flp1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Esteban V (2008)	18418059	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
429584	2538744	2538959	275327	275533	SPCC306.03c	SPCC18B5.11c	cnd2	cds1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Aono N (2002)	12000964	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
429585	2541051	2538744	277566	275327	SPBC3E7.08c	SPCC306.03c	rad13	cnd2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Aono N (2002)	12000964	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
429700	2539123	2540885	275695	277402	SPCC18B5.03	SPBC660.14	wee1	mik1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Katayama S (2002)	11809834	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
429702	2539527	2539123	276089	275695	SPCC338.16	SPCC18B5.03	pof3	wee1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Katayama S (2002)	11809834	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	budding:wild type|cell size:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
429703	2539527	2540885	276089	277402	SPCC338.16	SPBC660.14	pof3	mik1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Katayama S (2002)	11809834	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	budding|cell size	-	-	BIOGRID
429759	2541193	2541051	277707	277566	SPBC776.02c	SPBC3E7.08c	dis2	rad13	bws1|sds1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	den Elzen NR (2004)	14765108	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
429760	2541193	2539686	277707	276241	SPBC776.02c	SPBC1734.06	dis2	rhp18	bws1|sds1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	den Elzen NR (2004)	14765108	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
429761	2541193	2543580	277707	279995	SPBC776.02c	SPAC644.14c	dis2	rad51	bws1|sds1	rhp51	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	den Elzen NR (2004)	14765108	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
429791	2540618	2541580	277144	278077	SPBC3D6.11c	SPAC1687.05	slx8	pli1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Prudden J (2007)	17762865	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
429798	2540115	2539042	276652	275615	SPBC1778.02	SPCC1183.05c	rap1	lig4	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tomita K (2007)	17632059	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
429799	2542313	2539042	278779	275615	SPAC16A10.07c	SPCC1183.05c	taz1	lig4	myb|myb1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tomita K (2007)	17632059	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
429805	2540719	2541620	277242	278117	SPBC216.05	SPAC2G11.12	rad3	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Roguev A (2007)	17893680	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
429900	2543565	2541051	279981	277566	SPAPB24D3.04c	SPBC3E7.08c	mag1	rad13	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Memisoglu A (2000)	10735851	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
429903	2539864	2543412	276411	279834	SPBC16A3.15c	SPAC637.07	nda2	moe1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Chen CR (1999)	9892665	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:undetermined|cytoskeleton morphology:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
429904	2540582	2543412	277108	279834	SPBC26H8.07c	SPAC637.07	nda3	moe1	alp12|ben1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Chen CR (1999)	9892665	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:undetermined|cytoskeleton morphology:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
429936	2540244	2543164	276776	279595	SPBC336.01	SPAC3G6.06c	fbh1	rad2	fdh|fdh1	fen1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Morishita T (2005)	16135799	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
429940	2540244	2543580	276776	279995	SPBC336.01	SPAC644.14c	fbh1	rad51	fdh|fdh1	rhp51	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Morishita T (2005)	16135799	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	Deletion of RHP51 rescues the growth defect seen in an FBH1/SRS2 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
429942	2541620	2543580	278117	279995	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC644.14c	rqh1	rad51	hus2|rad12|rec9	rhp51	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Morishita T (2005)	16135799	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
429999	2542477	2542266	278937	278735	SPAC1B2.05	SPAC17D4.02	mcm5	cdc45	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	goa1|sna41	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Miyake S (1998)	9619628	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
430045	2540024	2541740	276568	278234	SPBP4H10.04	SPAC20G4.07c	ppb1	sts1	SPBC1346.01c	erg4	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yoshida T (1994)	7983142	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
430047	2540024	2540072	276568	276610	SPBP4H10.04	SPBC16H5.07c	ppb1	ppa2	SPBC1346.01c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yoshida T (1994)	7983142	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|cold sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
430048	2540024	2538758	276568	275341	SPBP4H10.04	SPCC1739.12	ppb1	ppe1	SPBC1346.01c	esp1|ppx1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yoshida T (1994)	7983142	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
430050	2540650	2541661	277175	278157	SPBC244.01c	SPAC6G10.12c	sid4	ace2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2006)	16415366	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
430051	2540660	2541661	277185	278157	SPBC21.06c	SPAC6G10.12c	cdc7	ace2	its10|pld1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Jin QW (2006)	16415366	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
430052	2541599	2542683	278096	279136	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAPYUG7.03c	sid2	mid2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Jin QW (2006)	16415366	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
430053	2541599	2543379	278096	279801	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC821.09	sid2	eng1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Jin QW (2006)	16415366	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
430054	2541599	3361476	278096	280552	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC16A10.04	sid2	rho4	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Jin QW (2006)	16415366	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
430110	2540825	2539403	277343	275968	SPBC428.08c	SPCC736.11	clr4	ago1	-	csp9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bayne EH (2010)	20211136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	only in the presence of Stc1|only in the presence of stc1 and drc1	-	BIOGRID
430121	2541372	2539420	277883	275985	SPBP8B7.28c	SPCC970.07c	stc1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bayne EH (2010)	20211136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
430122	2541372	2540825	277883	277343	SPBP8B7.28c	SPBC428.08c	stc1	clr4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bayne EH (2010)	20211136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
430123	2541372	2539050	277883	275623	SPBP8B7.28c	SPCC11E10.08	stc1	rik1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bayne EH (2010)	20211136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
430124	2541372	2539403	277883	275968	SPBP8B7.28c	SPCC736.11	stc1	ago1	-	csp9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bayne EH (2010)	20211136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
430572	2540398	2539733	276926	276285	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC16E9.12c	dis3	pab2	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lemay JF (2010)	20129053	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
430573	2543630	2539733	280044	276285	SPAC1F3.01	SPBC16E9.12c	rrp6	pab2	SPAC3H8.11	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lemay JF (2010)	20129053	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
430574	2543630	2539733	280044	276285	SPAC1F3.01	SPBC16E9.12c	rrp6	pab2	SPAC3H8.11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Lemay JF (2010)	20129053	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
430575	2540398	2539733	276926	276285	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC16E9.12c	dis3	pab2	rrp44	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Lemay JF (2010)	20129053	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
430576	3361384	2539733	280460	276285	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC16E9.12c	cid14	pab2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Lemay JF (2010)	20129053	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
430577	2540719	2543289	277242	279714	SPBC216.05	SPAC9E9.08	rad3	rad26	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Subramanian L (2010)	20140190	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
430579	2540719	2543289	277242	279714	SPBC216.05	SPAC9E9.08	rad3	rad26	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Subramanian L (2010)	20140190	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
430580	3361306	2540719	280382	277242	SPBC6B1.09c	SPBC216.05	nbs1	rad3	slr10	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Subramanian L (2010)	20140190	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	metabolism and growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
431000	2542632	2542677	279086	279130	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC26F1.10c	cdc25	pyp1	sal2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Millar JB (1992)	1464319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
431001	2542632	2542200	279086	278675	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC19D5.01	cdc25	pyp2	sal2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Millar JB (1992)	1464319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
431018	2541672	2542358	278168	278823	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC1782.09c	lsk1	clp1	-	flp1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Karagiannis J (2005)	15537703	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	stress resistance	Mutation of CLP1 aggravates sensitivity to protein expression in an LSK1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
431779	2542870	2543581	279315	279996	SPAC13G6.07c	SPAPB1E7.12	rps601	rps602	rps6-1	rps6|rps6-2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nakashima A (2010)	20144990	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	-	-	BIOGRID
431783	2540223	2540936	276756	277452	SPBC32F12.04	SPBC800.05c	gtb1	atb2	tug1	alp2|ban5|tub1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Takeoka A (2000)	11082048	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
431784	2540223	2539864	276756	276411	SPBC32F12.04	SPBC16A3.15c	gtb1	nda2	tug1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Takeoka A (2000)	11082048	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
431819	2541633	2538711	278129	275295	SPAC664.01c	SPCC1281.02c	swi6	spf30	SPAC824.10c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bernard P (2010)	20028739	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
431820	2540589	2538711	277115	275295	SPBC20F10.06	SPCC1281.02c	mad2	spf30	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bernard P (2010)	20028739	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
431821	2538711	2541185	275295	277699	SPCC1281.02c	SPBC6B1.07	spf30	prp1	-	zer1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bernard P (2010)	20028739	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
431822	2540589	10285	277115	115574	SPBC20F10.06	-	mad2	SMNDC1	-	SMNR|SPF30|TDRD16C	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bernard P (2010)	20028739	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	-	spindle morphology:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
431825	2538711	2540398	275295	276926	SPCC1281.02c	SPBC26H8.10	spf30	dis3	-	rrp44	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bernard P (2010)	20028739	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
431985	2543577	2542749	279992	279199	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC15A10.03c	srs2	rad54	-	rhp54	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Trickey M (2008)	18426916	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
431990	2541158	2541635	277673	278131	SPBC660.13c	SPAC1556.01c	ssb1	rad50	rad11|rpa1	SPAP4C9.01c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ono Y (2003)	14654689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
432032	2538959	2539087	275533	275659	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC1259.13	cds1	chk1	-	rad27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Miyabe I (2006)	16354704	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	-	-	BIOGRID
432033	2543580	2540802	279995	277321	SPAC644.14c	SPBC1921.02	rad51	rad60	rhp51	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Miyabe I (2006)	16354704	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	-	-	BIOGRID
432048	2540601	2542313	277127	278779	SPBC29A3.14c	SPAC16A10.07c	trt1	taz1	-	myb|myb1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Khair L (2010)	20040595	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
432050	2540601	2539352	277127	275918	SPBC29A3.14c	SPCC188.07	trt1	ccq1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Khair L (2010)	20040595	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	Deletion of CCQ1 causes aberrant telomere length in a TRT1/TAZ1 double mutant|Deletion of RAD3 causes aberrant telomere length in a TRT1/TAZ1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
432051	2542313	2539352	278779	275918	SPAC16A10.07c	SPCC188.07	taz1	ccq1	myb|myb1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Khair L (2010)	20040595	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	Deletion of CCQ1 causes aberrant telomere length in a TRT1/TAZ1 double mutant|Deletion of RAD3 causes aberrant telomere length in a TRT1/TAZ1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
435212	2543510	2538860	279928	275440	SPAC30D11.07	SPCC330.01c	nth1	rhp16	-	SPCC613.13c|rad16	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Osman F (2003)	12675805	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
435213	2543510	2543685	279928	280099	SPAC30D11.07	SPAC3C7.03c	nth1	rad55	-	rhp55	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Osman F (2003)	12675805	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
435214	2543510	2543164	279928	279595	SPAC30D11.07	SPAC3G6.06c	nth1	rad2	-	fen1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Osman F (2003)	12675805	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
435215	2543164	2538860	279595	275440	SPAC3G6.06c	SPCC330.01c	rad2	rhp16	fen1	SPCC613.13c|rad16	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Osman F (2003)	12675805	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
435216	2543685	2538860	280099	275440	SPAC3C7.03c	SPCC330.01c	rad55	rhp16	rhp55	SPCC613.13c|rad16	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Osman F (2003)	12675805	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
435217	2543510	2541120	279928	277635	SPAC30D11.07	SPBC649.03	nth1	rhp14	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Osman F (2003)	12675805	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
435218	2543510	2540887	279928	277404	SPAC30D11.07	SPBC4F6.15c	nth1	swi10	-	rad23	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Osman F (2003)	12675805	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
435219	2543510	2541051	279928	277566	SPAC30D11.07	SPBC3E7.08c	nth1	rad13	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Osman F (2003)	12675805	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
435224	2540024	2543576	276568	279991	SPBP4H10.04	SPAC4A8.05c	ppb1	myp2	SPBC1346.01c	myo3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fujita M (2002)	12136004	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	text only	-	BIOGRID
435266	2543580	2541051	279995	277566	SPAC644.14c	SPBC3E7.08c	rad51	rad13	rhp51	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Herrero AB (2006)	16912194	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	Deletion of RAD13 partially rescues growth of RAD51 mutants exposed to trabectedin	-	BIOGRID
435269	2543027	2539997	279463	276541	SPAC110.03	SPBC1604.14c	cdc42	shk1	-	orb2|pak1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Yang P (1999)	10593886	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
435271	2542312	2541580	278778	278077	SPAC16A10.06c	SPAC1687.05	nse2	pli1	pli2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Xhemalce B (2007)	17209013	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
435272	2542703	2541580	279156	278077	SPAC26H5.06	SPAC1687.05	pot1	pli1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Xhemalce B (2007)	17209013	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
435273	2539090	2541580	275662	278077	SPCC126.02c	SPAC1687.05	pku70	pli1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Xhemalce B (2007)	17209013	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	-	-	BIOGRID
435274	2540728	2541580	277251	278077	SPBC216.06c	SPAC1687.05	swi1	pli1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Xhemalce B (2007)	17209013	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	-	-	BIOGRID
435277	2543629	2541580	280043	278077	SPAC3H5.06c	SPAC1687.05	pol1	pli1	polA|swi7	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Xhemalce B (2007)	17209013	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
435278	2542144	2541580	278620	278077	SPAC6F6.17	SPAC1687.05	rif1	pli1	SPAPJ736.01|tap1|tap11	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Xhemalce B (2007)	17209013	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
435280	2542513	2542170	278971	278645	SPAC1952.05	SPAC17G8.13c	gcn5	mst2	kat2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nugent RL (2010)	20096118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	GCN5/MST2/ELP3 triple mutants grow very slowly	-	BIOGRID
435281	2542513	2541614	278971	278111	SPAC1952.05	SPAC29A4.20	gcn5	elp3	kat2	kat9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nugent RL (2010)	20096118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	GCN5/MST2/ELP3 triple mutants grow very slowly	-	BIOGRID
435282	2542170	2541614	278645	278111	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC29A4.20	mst2	elp3	-	kat9	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nugent RL (2010)	20096118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
435283	2542170	2541614	278645	278111	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC29A4.20	mst2	elp3	-	kat9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nugent RL (2010)	20096118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	GCN5/MST2/ELP3 triple mutants grow very slowly	-	BIOGRID
435284	2542513	2541614	278971	278111	SPAC1952.05	SPAC29A4.20	gcn5	elp3	kat2	kat9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nugent RL (2010)	20096118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	GCN5/MST2/ELP3 triple mutants show decreased histone acetylation	-	BIOGRID
435285	2542513	2542170	278971	278645	SPAC1952.05	SPAC17G8.13c	gcn5	mst2	kat2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nugent RL (2010)	20096118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	GCN5/MST2/ELP3 triple mutants show decreased histone acetylation	-	BIOGRID
435286	2542170	2541614	278645	278111	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC29A4.20	mst2	elp3	-	kat9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nugent RL (2010)	20096118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	GCN5/MST2/ELP3 triple mutants show decreased histone acetylation	-	BIOGRID
435287	2540025	2541386	276569	277897	SPBC16G5.01	SPBP8B7.24c	rpn12	atg8	SPBC342.07|mts3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
435288	2539423	2542198	275988	278673	SPCC663.12	SPAC6F12.09	cid12	rdp1	-	rdr1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Halic M (2010)	20178743	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|silencing:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
435289	2538930	3361384	275506	280460	SPCC188.13c	SPAC12G12.13c	dcr1	cid14	SPCC584.10c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Halic M (2010)	20178743	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	-	-	BIOGRID
435290	2538930	2540398	275506	276926	SPCC188.13c	SPBC26H8.10	dcr1	dis3	SPCC584.10c	rrp44	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Halic M (2010)	20178743	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	-	-	BIOGRID
435291	3361562	3361134	280638	280210	SPAC11E3.03	SPCC737.09c	csm1	hmt1	pcs1	SPCC74.08c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Schwartz MS (2010)	20221439	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	metal resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
435292	2539527	2539242	276089	275812	SPCC338.16	SPCC290.04	pof3	ams2	-	SPCC4F11.01	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Takayama Y (2010)	20230746	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435293	2539527	2540917	276089	277433	SPCC338.16	SPBC409.05	pof3	skp1	-	psh1|sph1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Takayama Y (2010)	20230746	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435294	2539399	2539242	275964	275812	SPCC550.13	SPCC290.04	dfp1	ams2	him1|rad35|dbf4	SPCC4F11.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Takayama Y (2010)	20230746	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435295	2541165	2539399	277680	275964	SPBC776.12c	SPCC550.13	hsk1	dfp1	cdc7	him1|rad35|dbf4	Two-hybrid	physical	Takayama Y (2010)	20230746	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435296	2539242	2541165	275812	277680	SPCC290.04	SPBC776.12c	ams2	hsk1	SPCC4F11.01	cdc7	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Takayama Y (2010)	20230746	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435297	2541165	2539242	277680	275812	SPBC776.12c	SPCC290.04	hsk1	ams2	cdc7	SPCC4F11.01	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Takayama Y (2010)	20230746	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435298	2539242	2541165	275812	277680	SPCC290.04	SPBC776.12c	ams2	hsk1	SPCC4F11.01	cdc7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Takayama Y (2010)	20230746	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	double mutants show a cell cycle delay	-	BIOGRID
435299	2539815	2539815	276365	276365	SPBC1105.02c	SPBC1105.02c	lys4	lys4	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Bulfer SL (2010)	20089861	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435305	2542029	2542290	278511	278758	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC17C9.03	rad24	tif471	anr5|sam4	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Selvanathan SP (2010)	20231270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged RAD24	-	BIOGRID
435306	2542029	2539938	278511	276482	SPAC8E11.02c	SPBC17D11.05	rad24	tif32	anr5|sam4	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Selvanathan SP (2010)	20231270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged RAD24	-	BIOGRID
435307	2542029	2541975	278511	278460	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC20G8.05c	rad24	cdc15	anr5|sam4	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Selvanathan SP (2010)	20231270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged RAD24	-	BIOGRID
435308	2542029	2541268	278511	277782	SPAC8E11.02c	SPBP19A11.03c	rad24	mts4	anr5|sam4	rpn1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Selvanathan SP (2010)	20231270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged RAD24	-	BIOGRID
435309	2542029	2541695	278511	278191	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC1F7.05	rad24	cdc22	anr5|sam4	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Selvanathan SP (2010)	20231270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged RAD24	-	BIOGRID
435310	2542029	2542090	278511	278567	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC25G10.08	rad24	SPAC25G10.08	anr5|sam4	p116	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Selvanathan SP (2010)	20231270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged RAD24	-	BIOGRID
435311	2542029	2542632	278511	279086	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC24H6.05	rad24	cdc25	anr5|sam4	sal2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Selvanathan SP (2010)	20231270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged RAD24	-	BIOGRID
435312	2542029	2542875	278511	279320	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC13G7.02c	rad24	ssa1	anr5|sam4	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Selvanathan SP (2010)	20231270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged RAD24	-	BIOGRID
435313	2542029	2539225	278511	275795	SPAC8E11.02c	SPCC1739.13	rad24	ssa2	anr5|sam4	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Selvanathan SP (2010)	20231270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged RAD24	-	BIOGRID
435314	2542029	2542907	278511	279351	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC1420.03	rad24	rpn501	anr5|sam4	rpn5|rpn5-a	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Selvanathan SP (2010)	20231270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged RAD24	-	BIOGRID
435315	2542029	2543347	278511	279769	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAPB8E5.02c	rad24	rpn502	anr5|sam4	rpn5|rpn5-b	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Selvanathan SP (2010)	20231270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged RAD24	-	BIOGRID
435316	2542029	2540939	278511	277455	SPAC8E11.02c	SPBC4.07c	rad24	rpt2	anr5|sam4	mts2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Selvanathan SP (2010)	20231270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged RAD24	-	BIOGRID
435317	2542029	2543580	278511	279995	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC644.14c	rad24	rad51	anr5|sam4	rhp51	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Selvanathan SP (2010)	20231270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged RAD24	-	BIOGRID
435318	2542029	2541807	278511	278298	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC23G3.11	rad24	rpn6	anr5|sam4	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Selvanathan SP (2010)	20231270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged RAD24	-	BIOGRID
435319	2542029	2539741	278511	276293	SPAC8E11.02c	SPBC16A3.05c	rad24	rae1	anr5|sam4	cut21	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Selvanathan SP (2010)	20231270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged RAD24	-	BIOGRID
435320	2542029	2542029	278511	278511	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC8E11.02c	rad24	rad24	anr5|sam4	anr5|sam4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Selvanathan SP (2010)	20231270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged RAD24	-	BIOGRID
435321	2542029	2542252	278511	278722	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC17A2.13c	rad24	rad25	anr5|sam4	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Selvanathan SP (2010)	20231270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged RAD24	-	BIOGRID
435322	2542029	2543058	278511	279492	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC3G6.02	rad24	rpn15	anr5|sam4	dss1|sem1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Selvanathan SP (2010)	20231270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged RAD24	-	BIOGRID
435323	2542029	2543058	278511	279492	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC3G6.02	rad24	rpn15	anr5|sam4	dss1|sem1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Selvanathan SP (2010)	20231270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435324	2542029	2539741	278511	276293	SPAC8E11.02c	SPBC16A3.05c	rad24	rae1	anr5|sam4	cut21	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Selvanathan SP (2010)	20231270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435325	2542029	2543580	278511	279995	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC644.14c	rad24	rad51	anr5|sam4	rhp51	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Selvanathan SP (2010)	20231270	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435326	2542773	2540593	279222	277119	SPAC16.01	SPBC28E12.03	rho2	rga4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Soto T (2010)	20164182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435327	2543027	2540593	279463	277119	SPAC110.03	SPBC28E12.03	cdc42	rga4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Soto T (2010)	20164182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435328	2540593	2542773	277119	279222	SPBC28E12.03	SPAC16.01	rga4	rho2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Soto T (2010)	20164182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435329	2540593	2542773	277119	279222	SPBC28E12.03	SPAC16.01	rga4	rho2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Soto T (2010)	20164182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
435330	2540593	2539649	277119	276204	SPBC28E12.03	SPBC12D12.04c	rga4	pck2	-	pkc1|sts6	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Soto T (2010)	20164182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
435331	2540593	2541889	277119	278379	SPBC28E12.03	SPAC2F7.03c	rga4	pom1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Soto T (2010)	20164182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
435332	2541889	2539920	278379	276464	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC119.08	pom1	pmk1	-	spm1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Soto T (2010)	20164182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
435333	2540593	2539920	277119	276464	SPBC28E12.03	SPBC119.08	rga4	pmk1	-	spm1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Soto T (2010)	20164182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
435334	2542773	2540635	279222	277161	SPAC16.01	SPBC23G7.08c	rho2	rga7	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Soto T (2010)	20164182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
435335	2540593	2540635	277119	277161	SPBC28E12.03	SPBC23G7.08c	rga4	rga7	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Soto T (2010)	20164182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	-	-	BIOGRID
435336	2542682	2540635	279135	277161	SPAC26A3.09c	SPBC23G7.08c	rga2	rga7	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Soto T (2010)	20164182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	-	-	BIOGRID
435337	2540593	2540635	277119	277161	SPBC28E12.03	SPBC23G7.08c	rga4	rga7	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Soto T (2010)	20164182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
435338	2540635	2539920	277161	276464	SPBC23G7.08c	SPBC119.08	rga7	pmk1	-	spm1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Soto T (2010)	20164182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
435339	2543576	2539513	279991	276075	SPAC4A8.05c	SPCC645.05c	myp2	myo2	myo3	rng5	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Stark BC (2010)	20110347	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
435340	2541940	2539513	278427	276075	SPAC27F1.02c	SPCC645.05c	cdc8	myo2	fus4	rng5	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Stark BC (2010)	20110347	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
435342	2539974	2541720	276518	278214	SPBC32H8.07	SPAC23H3.13c	git5	gpa2	gpb1	git8	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ivey FD (2010)	20139237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
435343	2540666	2541720	277191	278214	SPBC215.04	SPAC23H3.13c	git11	gpa2	-	git8	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ivey FD (2010)	20139237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
435344	3361532	2542299	280608	278766	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC18B11.10	lkh1	tup11	kic1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kang WH (2010)	20200159	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435345	3361532	2543402	280608	279824	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC630.14c	lkh1	tup12	kic1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kang WH (2010)	20200159	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435346	3361532	2542299	280608	278766	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC18B11.10	lkh1	tup11	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kang WH (2010)	20200159	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435347	3361532	2543402	280608	279824	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC630.14c	lkh1	tup12	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kang WH (2010)	20200159	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435348	3361532	2542299	280608	278766	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC18B11.10	lkh1	tup11	kic1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kang WH (2010)	20200159	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435349	3361532	2543402	280608	279824	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC630.14c	lkh1	tup12	kic1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kang WH (2010)	20200159	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435351	2542299	2543402	278766	279824	SPAC18B11.10	SPAC630.14c	tup11	tup12	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kang WH (2010)	20200159	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	invasive growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
435352	2542299	2540656	278766	277181	SPAC18B11.10	SPBC23E6.09	tup11	ssn6	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kang WH (2010)	20200159	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
435353	2543402	2540656	279824	277181	SPAC630.14c	SPBC23E6.09	tup12	ssn6	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kang WH (2010)	20200159	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
435354	2541916	2543671	278406	280085	SPAC23C4.19	SPAC644.04	spt5	pct1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Schneider S (2010)	20231361	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	Overexpression of both PCT1 and PCE1 rescues growth in an SPT5 mutant	-	BIOGRID
435355	2541916	2540362	278406	276891	SPAC23C4.19	SPBC2F12.08c	spt5	ceg1	-	pce1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Schneider S (2010)	20231361	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	Overexpression of both PCT1 and PCE1 rescues growth in an SPT5 mutant	-	BIOGRID
435356	2541916	50628	278406	119102	SPAC23C4.19	-	spt5	GEMIN4	-	HC56|HCAP1|HHRF-1|p97	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Schneider S (2010)	20231361	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
435357	2541916	2540292	278406	276823	SPAC23C4.19	SPBC28F2.12	spt5	rpb1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Schneider S (2010)	20231361	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity|heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
435358	2543671	2541916	280085	278406	SPAC644.04	SPAC23C4.19	pct1	spt5	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Schneider S (2010)	20231361	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435359	2540362	2541916	276891	278406	SPBC2F12.08c	SPAC23C4.19	ceg1	spt5	pce1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Schneider S (2010)	20231361	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435364	2543513	2540413	279931	276941	SPAC821.06	SPBC19F8.01c	spn2	spn7	-	SPBC21.08c|mde8	Co-localization	physical	Onishi M (2010)	20123972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435365	2540413	2540413	276941	276941	SPBC19F8.01c	SPBC19F8.01c	spn7	spn7	SPBC21.08c|mde8	SPBC21.08c|mde8	Co-localization	physical	Onishi M (2010)	20123972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435366	2542641	2540413	279095	276941	SPAC24C9.15c	SPBC19F8.01c	spn5	spn7	mde9|meu28	SPBC21.08c|mde8	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Onishi M (2010)	20123972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435367	2542641	2543513	279095	279931	SPAC24C9.15c	SPAC821.06	spn5	spn2	mde9|meu28	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Onishi M (2010)	20123972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435368	2542641	2538950	279095	275524	SPAC24C9.15c	SPCC188.12	spn5	spn6	mde9|meu28	SPCC584.09	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Onishi M (2010)	20123972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435369	2543513	2539892	279931	276438	SPAC821.06	SPBC1347.03	spn2	meu14	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Onishi M (2010)	20123972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis	-	-	BIOGRID
435370	2542641	2539892	279095	276438	SPAC24C9.15c	SPBC1347.03	spn5	meu14	mde9|meu28	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Onishi M (2010)	20123972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis	-	-	BIOGRID
435371	2538950	2539892	275524	276438	SPCC188.12	SPBC1347.03	spn6	meu14	SPCC584.09	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Onishi M (2010)	20123972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis	-	-	BIOGRID
435372	2540413	2539892	276941	276438	SPBC19F8.01c	SPBC1347.03	spn7	meu14	SPBC21.08c|mde8	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Onishi M (2010)	20123972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis	-	-	BIOGRID
435373	2539437	3361476	276000	280552	SPCC645.06c	SPAC16A10.04	rgf3	rho4	lad1	-	Co-localization	physical	Justa-Schuch D (2010)	20199606	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435374	2543603	852986	280018	33337	SPAC4A8.08c	YGR094W	vrs2	VAS1	ValRS2|vas2|vas1	valine--tRNA ligase|L000002457	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Chiu WC (2010)	20106903	284812	559292	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
435375	2541652	2540329	278148	276859	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC29B5.01	sty1	atf1	phh1|spc1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Day AM (2010)	20061379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	oxidative stress resistance:wild type|viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
435376	2541652	2540329	278148	276859	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC29B5.01	sty1	atf1	phh1|spc1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Day AM (2010)	20061379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	-	-	BIOGRID
435377	2541652	2540329	278148	276859	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC29B5.01	sty1	atf1	phh1|spc1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Day AM (2010)	20061379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	oxidative stress resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
435378	2540064	2541604	276602	278101	SPBC1718.02	SPAC14C4.03	hop1	mek1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Latypov V (2010)	20123974	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance|mitotic recombination	-	-	BIOGRID
435379	2541604	2541635	278101	278131	SPAC14C4.03	SPAC1556.01c	mek1	rad50	-	SPAP4C9.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Latypov V (2010)	20123974	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
435380	856490	2543454	36525	279874	YHR090C	SPAC3G9.08	YNG2	png1	EAF4|NBN1|histone acetyltransferase YNG2|L000004452	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Chen JQ (2010)	20299455	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
435381	2543454	856490	279874	36525	SPAC3G9.08	YHR090C	png1	YNG2	-	EAF4|NBN1|histone acetyltransferase YNG2|L000004452	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Chen JQ (2010)	20299455	284812	559292	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
435382	854418	2543506	34635	279924	YOR244W	SPAC637.12c	ESA1	mst1	TAS1|NuA4 histone acetyltransferase complex catalytic subunit ESA1|KAT5|L000003952	kat5	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Chen JQ (2010)	20299455	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
435383	2543506	2543454	279924	279874	SPAC637.12c	SPAC3G9.08	mst1	png1	kat5	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen JQ (2010)	20299455	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435384	2543506	2543086	279924	279519	SPAC637.12c	SPAC30D11.10	mst1	rad52	kat5	rad22|rad22A	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Chen JQ (2010)	20299455	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
435385	2543454	2543506	279874	279924	SPAC3G9.08	SPAC637.12c	png1	mst1	-	kat5	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chen JQ (2010)	20299455	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
435645	2543289	2540582	279714	277108	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC26H8.07c	rad26	nda3	-	alp12|ben1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Herring M (2010)	20375067	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	Mutation of NDA3 rescues growth of RAD26 mutants in the presence of MBC	-	BIOGRID
435646	2543289	2540589	279714	277115	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC20F10.06	rad26	mad2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Herring M (2010)	20375067	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to MBC	-	BIOGRID
435647	2543289	2540589	279714	277115	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC20F10.06	rad26	mad2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Herring M (2010)	20375067	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	deletion of MAD2 increases chromosome loss in a RAD26 or RAD3 mutant background	-	BIOGRID
435648	2540719	2540589	277242	277115	SPBC216.05	SPBC20F10.06	rad3	mad2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Herring M (2010)	20375067	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	deletion of MAD2 increases chromosome loss in a RAD26 or RAD3 mutant background	-	BIOGRID
435649	2539330	2542618	275896	279072	SPCC1753.03c	SPAC1952.15c	rec7	rec24	-	mug6	Two-hybrid	physical	Steiner S (2010)	20364342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435650	2542150	2540221	278626	276754	SPAC17A5.11	SPBC32F12.02	rec12	rec14	spo11	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Steiner S (2010)	20364342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435651	2543273	2541973	279701	278458	SPAC1002.06c	SPAC6G9.13c	bqt2	bqt1	mug18|rec23	mug23|rec26	Two-hybrid	physical	Steiner S (2010)	20364342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435652	2542618	2539330	279072	275896	SPAC1952.15c	SPCC1753.03c	rec24	rec7	mug6	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Steiner S (2010)	20364342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435653	2541973	2543273	278458	279701	SPAC6G9.13c	SPAC1002.06c	bqt1	bqt2	mug23|rec26	mug18|rec23	Two-hybrid	physical	Steiner S (2010)	20364342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435654	2540312	2540221	276842	276754	SPBC31F10.08	SPBC32F12.02	mde2	rec14	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Steiner S (2010)	20364342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435655	2542618	2539330	279072	275896	SPAC1952.15c	SPCC1753.03c	rec24	rec7	mug6	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Steiner S (2010)	20364342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435656	2539487	2542632	276050	279086	SPCC895.05	SPAC24H6.05	for3	cdc25	-	sal2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Minc N (2010)	20362451	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	double mutants show aberrant cell orientation in response to electrical inputs	-	BIOGRID
435662	2540368	2540821	276897	277339	SPBC36.05c	SPBC800.03	clr6	clr3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Grewal SI (1998)	9755190	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
435663	2540368	2540558	276897	277085	SPBC36.05c	SPBC2D10.17	clr6	clr1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Grewal SI (1998)	9755190	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
435669	2542207	2542632	278682	279086	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC24H6.05	ddb1	cdc25	-	sal2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bondar T (2004)	14701809	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	-	-	BIOGRID
435670	2542207	2542696	278682	279149	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC29B12.03	ddb1	spd1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Bondar T (2004)	14701809	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
435671	2542207	2542696	278682	279149	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC29B12.03	ddb1	spd1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bondar T (2004)	14701809	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
435965	2541809	2541810	278300	278301	SPAC22A12.11	SPAC977.16c	dak1	dak2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Matsuzawa T (2010)	20396879	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	utilization of carbon source|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
435966	3361400	2543586	280476	280001	SPAC1093.06c	SPAC458.04c	dhc1	dli1	SPAC30C2.01c	dil1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Fujita I (2010)	20298435	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
435968	3361400	2542069	280476	278546	SPAC1093.06c	SPAC27D7.13c	dhc1	ssm4	SPAC30C2.01c	SPAC637.01c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Fujita I (2010)	20298435	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436017	2541929	2540458	278417	276986	SPAC23C4.12	SPBC29A10.14	hhp2	rec8	-	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Ishiguro T (2010)	20383139	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Overexpression of REC8 causes growth defects in an HHP1/HHP2 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
436018	2540718	2540458	277241	276986	SPBC3H7.15	SPBC29A10.14	hhp1	rec8	-	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Ishiguro T (2010)	20383139	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Overexpression of REC8 causes growth defects in an HHP1/HHP2 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
436122	2543237	2540255	279665	276786	SPAC6B12.02c	SPBC336.04	mus7	cdc6	mms22	mis10|pol3|pold	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Dovey CL (2007)	17660542	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
436123	2543237	3361323	279665	280399	SPAC6B12.02c	SPBC30D10.04	mus7	swi3	mms22	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Dovey CL (2007)	17660542	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
436124	2543237	2540728	279665	277251	SPAC6B12.02c	SPBC216.06c	mus7	swi1	mms22	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Dovey CL (2007)	17660542	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
436125	2543237	2539087	279665	275659	SPAC6B12.02c	SPCC1259.13	mus7	chk1	mms22	rad27	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Dovey CL (2007)	17660542	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
436277	2540919	2542175	277435	278650	SPBC543.07	SPAC1F3.02c	pek1	mkh1	mkk1|skh1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sugiura R (1999)	10365961	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	overexpression of both genes causes impaired growth in the presence of MgCl2	-	BIOGRID
436285	2542744	2539641	279194	276196	SPAC1565.08	SPBC14C8.01c	cdc48	cut2	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	SPBC1815.02c	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Ikai N (2006)	16904908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	Overexpression of CUT2 is lethal in a CDC48 mutant at 36 degrees	-	BIOGRID
436288	2539090	2540601	275662	277127	SPCC126.02c	SPBC29A3.14c	pku70	trt1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Baumann P (2000)	11029034	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
436290	2543097	2541055	279529	277570	SPAC4A8.04	SPBC409.07c	isp6	wis1	prb1	smf2|spc2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nakashima A (2006)	16550352	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation efficiency	-	-	BIOGRID
436291	2543097	2539781	279529	276331	SPAC4A8.04	SPBC106.10	isp6	pka1	prb1	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nakashima A (2006)	16550352	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation efficiency	-	-	BIOGRID
436301	2543577	2543685	279992	280099	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC3C7.03c	srs2	rad55	-	rhp55	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Doe CL (2004)	14993467	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
436302	2543577	2543685	279992	280099	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC3C7.03c	srs2	rad55	-	rhp55	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Doe CL (2004)	14993467	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	deletion of rhp55 partially rescues growth in an srs2/rqh1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
436303	2541620	2543685	278117	280099	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC3C7.03c	rqh1	rad55	hus2|rad12|rec9	rhp55	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Doe CL (2004)	14993467	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	deletion of rhp55 partially rescues growth in an srs2/rqh1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
436304	2543577	2542007	279992	278490	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC20H4.07	srs2	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Doe CL (2004)	14993467	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	deletion of rhp57 partially rescues growth in an srs2/rqh1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
436305	2541620	2542007	278117	278490	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC20H4.07	rqh1	rad57	hus2|rad12|rec9	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Doe CL (2004)	14993467	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	deletion of rhp57 partially rescues growth in an srs2/rqh1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
436306	2543577	2543580	279992	279995	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC644.14c	srs2	rad51	-	rhp51	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Doe CL (2004)	14993467	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	deletion of rhp51 partially rescues growth in an srs2/rqh1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
436307	2541620	2543580	278117	279995	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC644.14c	rqh1	rad51	hus2|rad12|rec9	rhp51	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Doe CL (2004)	14993467	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	deletion of rhp51 partially rescues growth in an srs2/rqh1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
436308	2543577	2542622	279992	279076	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC18B11.07c	srs2	rhp6	-	sng1|ubc2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Doe CL (2004)	14993467	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
436309	2543577	2539686	279992	276241	SPAC4H3.05	SPBC1734.06	srs2	rhp18	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Doe CL (2004)	14993467	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
436310	2543577	3361391	279992	280467	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC13G6.01c	srs2	rad8	-	SPAC5H10.14c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Doe CL (2004)	14993467	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
436845	855668	2539403	35765	275968	YNL056W	SPCC736.11	OCA2	ago1	-	csp9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kaufmann I (2010)	20404084	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436846	855668	2541804	35765	278295	YNL056W	SPAC29A4.18	OCA2	prw1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kaufmann I (2010)	20404084	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436847	855668	2542502	35765	278960	YNL056W	SPAC139.06	OCA2	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kaufmann I (2010)	20404084	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436849	855668	2540368	35765	276897	YNL056W	SPBC36.05c	OCA2	clr6	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kaufmann I (2010)	20404084	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	-	-	BIOGRID
436889	3361384	2541639	280460	278135	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC6F12.16c	cid14	mtr4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436890	3361384	2541349	280460	277860	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBP35G2.08c	cid14	air1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436891	2541349	2541639	277860	278135	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC6F12.16c	air1	mtr4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436892	2541349	3361384	277860	280460	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC12G12.13c	air1	cid14	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436893	3361384	3361384	280460	280460	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC12G12.13c	cid14	cid14	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436894	3361384	2541349	280460	277860	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBP35G2.08c	cid14	air1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436895	3361384	2541639	280460	278135	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC6F12.16c	cid14	mtr4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436896	3361384	2541344	280460	277855	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBP8B7.03c	cid14	rpl402	-	rpl4|rpl4-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436897	3361384	2539780	280460	276330	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC1711.06	cid14	rpl401	-	rpl4|rpl4-1|rpl4-2|rpl402	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436898	3361384	5802952	280460	858090	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC1F7.13c	cid14	rpl801	-	SPAC21E11.02c|rpk5a|rpl18|rpl2-1|rpl8-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436899	3361384	2541989	280460	278473	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC23A1.08c	cid14	rpl3401	-	rpl34|rpl34-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436900	3361384	2540517	280460	277045	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC29A3.04	cid14	rpl8	-	rpl701|rpl7a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436901	3361384	2541491	280460	277993	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC2C4.16c	cid14	rps801	-	rps8|rps8-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436902	3361384	2539308	280460	275875	SPAC12G12.13c	SPCC613.05c	cid14	rpl35	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436903	3361384	2542904	280460	279348	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC144.11	cid14	rps1102	-	rps11|rps11-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436904	3361384	2541130	280460	277645	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC776.11	cid14	rpl2801	-	rpl28-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436905	3361384	2539701	280460	276254	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC106.18	cid14	rpl2501	-	rpl25a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436906	3361384	2540180	280460	276713	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC16D10.11c	cid14	rps1801	-	rps18-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436907	3361384	3361064	280460	280140	SPAC12G12.13c	SPCC1259.01c	cid14	rps1802	-	SPCC825.06c|rps18-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436908	3361384	2540366	280460	276895	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC2F12.07c	cid14	rpl802	-	rpk37|rpk5b|rpl8-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436909	3361384	2541191	280460	277705	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC839.04	cid14	rpl803	-	rpk5-b|rpkD4|rpl8-3|SPBC24E9.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436910	3361384	2539548	280460	276109	SPAC12G12.13c	SPCC5E4.07	cid14	rpl2802	-	rpl28|rpl28-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436911	3361384	2543120	280460	279552	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC31G5.03	cid14	rps1101	-	rps11-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436912	3361384	2541229	280460	277743	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC839.05c	cid14	rps1701	-	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436913	3361384	2540817	280460	277335	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC3H5.05c	cid14	rps1401	-	rps14|rps14-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436914	3361384	5802781	280460	857919	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC18H10.13	cid14	rps1402	-	rps14-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436915	3361384	2541591	280460	278088	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC26A3.07c	cid14	rpl1101	-	rpl11|rpl11-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436916	3361384	2539846	280460	276394	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC17G9.10	cid14	rpl1102	-	rpl11-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436917	3361384	2542108	280460	278584	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC6F6.07c	cid14	rps13	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436918	3361384	2542782	280460	279231	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC1687.06c	cid14	rpl44	-	rpl28	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436919	3361384	2541156	280460	277671	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC685.07c	cid14	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436920	3361384	2542093	280460	278570	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC26A3.04	cid14	rpl2002	-	rpl20|rpl20-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436921	3361384	3361377	280460	280453	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAPB17E12.13	cid14	rpl1802	-	rpl18-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436922	3361384	2542265	280460	278734	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC17A5.03	cid14	rpl301	-	rpl3|rpl3-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436923	3361384	2540841	280460	277358	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC18H10.12c	cid14	rpl701	-	rpl7|rpl7-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436924	3361384	2543553	280460	279970	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC664.05	cid14	rpl13	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436925	3361384	2540812	280460	277331	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC18H10.14	cid14	rps1601	-	rps16-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436926	3361384	2538883	280460	275461	SPAC12G12.13c	SPCC970.05	cid14	rpl3601	-	rpl36-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436927	3361384	2539336	280460	275902	SPAC12G12.13c	SPCC74.05	cid14	rpl2702	-	rpl27-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436928	3361384	2541570	280460	278067	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC6G9.09c	cid14	rpl2401	-	rpl24|rpl24-01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436929	3361384	2540135	280460	276672	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC16C6.11	cid14	rpl3201	-	rpl32-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436930	3361384	2539286	280460	275854	SPAC12G12.13c	SPCC1322.11	cid14	rpl2302	-	rpl23-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436931	3361384	2543581	280460	279996	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAPB1E7.12	cid14	rps602	-	rps6|rps6-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436932	3361384	2539222	280460	275792	SPAC12G12.13c	SPCC1183.08c	cid14	rpl101	-	rpl1-1|rpl10a-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436933	3361384	2540682	280460	277207	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC800.04c	cid14	rpl4301	-	rpl37a-1|rpl43|rpl43-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436934	3361384	2540950	280460	277466	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC365.03c	cid14	rpl2101	-	rpl21|rpl21-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436935	3361384	2542553	280460	279010	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC18G6.14c	cid14	rps7	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436936	3361384	2539372	280460	275938	SPAC12G12.13c	SPCC622.18	cid14	rpl6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436937	3361384	2542370	280460	278834	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC1783.08c	cid14	rpl1502	-	rpl15-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436938	3361384	2542006	280460	278489	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC23A1.11	cid14	rpl1602	-	rpl16-2|rpl13a-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436939	3361384	2542538	280460	278995	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC1805.11c	cid14	rps2602	-	rps26-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436940	3361384	2542725	280460	279176	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC3A12.10	cid14	rpl2001	-	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436941	3361384	2540870	280460	277387	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC56F2.02	cid14	rpl1901	-	rpl19-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436942	3361384	2540274	280460	276805	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC29B5.03c	cid14	rpl26	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436943	3361384	3361407	280460	280483	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAPB17E12.05	cid14	rpl3703	-	rpl37	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436944	3361384	2541737	280460	278231	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC22H12.04c	cid14	rps102	-	rps1-2|rps3a-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436945	3361384	2542425	280460	278887	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC1805.13	cid14	rpl14	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436946	3361384	2542848	280460	279294	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC9G1.03c	cid14	rpl3001	-	rpl30|rpl30-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436947	3361384	2543021	280460	279457	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC11E3.15	cid14	rpl22	-	SPAP8A3.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436948	3361384	2541838	280460	278329	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC22A12.04c	cid14	rps2201	-	rps15a-1|rps22-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436949	3361384	2543448	280460	279868	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC3H5.07	cid14	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436950	3361384	2539678	280460	276233	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC11C11.07	cid14	rpl1801	-	rpl18|rpl18-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436951	3361384	2542817	280460	279264	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC13G6.02c	cid14	rps101	-	rps1-1|rps3a-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436952	3361384	2540609	280460	277135	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC19G7.03c	cid14	rps3002	-	rps30|rps30-2|ysprs30	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436953	3361384	2542603	280460	279057	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC19B12.04	cid14	rps3001	-	rps30-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436954	3361384	2543559	280460	279975	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC664.04c	cid14	rps1602	-	rps16|rps16-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436955	3361384	2542939	280460	279380	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC8C9.08	cid14	rps5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436956	3361384	2539848	280460	276396	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC17G9.07	cid14	rps2402	-	rps24-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436957	3361384	2540367	280460	276896	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC29A3.12	cid14	rps902	-	rps9-2|rps9b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436958	3361384	2543453	280460	279873	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC3G9.03	cid14	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436959	3361384	2542430	280460	278892	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC17G6.06	cid14	rps2401	-	rps24|rps24-1|rps24a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436960	3361384	2542629	280460	279083	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC24H6.07	cid14	rps901	-	rps9-1|rps9a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436961	3361384	2539797	280460	276347	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC16G5.14c	cid14	rps3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436962	3361384	2540795	280460	277314	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC18E5.04	cid14	rpl1001	-	rpl10|rpl10-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436963	3361384	2543307	280460	279731	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC694.05c	cid14	rps2502	-	rps25|rps25-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436964	3361384	2542912	280460	279355	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC1071.07c	cid14	rps1502	-	rps15|rps15-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436965	3361384	2543475	280460	279895	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC890.08	cid14	rpl31	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436966	3361384	2539067	280460	275639	SPAC12G12.13c	SPCC576.08c	cid14	rps2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436967	3361384	2539470	280460	276033	SPAC12G12.13c	SPCC576.11	cid14	rpl15	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436968	3361384	2543085	280460	279518	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC806.03c	cid14	rps2601	-	rps26|rps26-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436969	3361384	2543337	280460	279760	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC959.08	cid14	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436970	3361384	2541977	280460	278462	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC5D6.01	cid14	rps2202	-	rps15a-2|rps22-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436971	2541349	3361384	277860	280460	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC12G12.13c	air1	cid14	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436972	2541349	2541349	277860	277860	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBP35G2.08c	air1	air1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436973	2541349	2541639	277860	278135	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC6F12.16c	air1	mtr4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436974	2541349	2541344	277860	277855	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBP8B7.03c	air1	rpl402	-	rpl4|rpl4-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436975	2541349	2539780	277860	276330	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC1711.06	air1	rpl401	-	rpl4|rpl4-1|rpl4-2|rpl402	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436976	2541349	2543553	277860	279970	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC664.05	air1	rpl13	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436977	2541349	2542108	277860	278584	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC6F6.07c	air1	rps13	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436978	2541349	2540517	277860	277045	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC29A3.04	air1	rpl8	-	rpl701|rpl7a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436979	2541349	5802952	277860	858090	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC1F7.13c	air1	rpl801	-	SPAC21E11.02c|rpk5a|rpl18|rpl2-1|rpl8-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436980	2541349	2540366	277860	276895	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC2F12.07c	air1	rpl802	-	rpk37|rpk5b|rpl8-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436981	2541349	2541191	277860	277705	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC839.04	air1	rpl803	-	rpk5-b|rpkD4|rpl8-3|SPBC24E9.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436982	2541349	2539548	277860	276109	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC5E4.07	air1	rpl2802	-	rpl28|rpl28-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436983	2541349	2543337	277860	279760	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC959.08	air1	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436984	2541349	2539308	277860	275875	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC613.05c	air1	rpl35	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436985	2541349	2539013	277860	275586	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC364.03	air1	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436986	2541349	2539678	277860	276233	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC11C11.07	air1	rpl1801	-	rpl18|rpl18-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436987	2541349	2541591	277860	278088	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC26A3.07c	air1	rpl1101	-	rpl11|rpl11-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436988	2541349	2539846	277860	276394	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC17G9.10	air1	rpl1102	-	rpl11-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436989	2541349	2539372	277860	275938	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC622.18	air1	rpl6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436990	2541349	2541491	277860	277993	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC2C4.16c	air1	rps801	-	rps8|rps8-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436991	2541349	2542265	277860	278734	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC17A5.03	air1	rpl301	-	rpl3|rpl3-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436992	2541349	2542553	277860	279010	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC18G6.14c	air1	rps7	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436993	2541349	2543021	277860	279457	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC11E3.15	air1	rpl22	-	SPAP8A3.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436994	2541349	2540135	277860	276672	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC16C6.11	air1	rpl3201	-	rpl32-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436995	2541349	2543475	277860	279895	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC890.08	air1	rpl31	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436996	2541349	2540180	277860	276713	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC16D10.11c	air1	rps1801	-	rps18-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436997	2541349	3361064	277860	280140	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC1259.01c	air1	rps1802	-	SPCC825.06c|rps18-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436998	2541349	2538883	277860	275461	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC970.05	air1	rpl3601	-	rpl36-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
436999	2541349	2538893	277860	275471	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC18.14c	air1	rpp0	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437000	2541349	2541989	277860	278473	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC23A1.08c	air1	rpl3401	-	rpl34|rpl34-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437001	2541349	2541737	277860	278231	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC22H12.04c	air1	rps102	-	rps1-2|rps3a-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437002	2541349	2539470	277860	276033	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC576.11	air1	rpl15	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437003	2541349	2543448	277860	279868	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC3H5.07	air1	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437004	2541349	2543453	277860	279873	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC3G9.03	air1	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437005	2541349	2539286	277860	275854	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC1322.11	air1	rpl2302	-	rpl23-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437006	2541349	2539035	277860	275608	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC794.09c	air1	tef101	-	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437007	2541349	2539782	277860	276332	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC1815.01	air1	eno101	-	eno1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437008	2541349	2543307	277860	279731	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC694.05c	air1	rps2502	-	rps25|rps25-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437009	2541349	2539523	277860	276085	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC622.09	air1	htb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437010	2541349	2540547	277860	277074	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC32F12.11	air1	tdh1	-	gpd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437011	2541349	2542463	277860	278924	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC1834.03c	air1	hhf1	-	h4.1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437012	2541349	2539991	277860	276535	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC1105.12	air1	hhf3	-	h4.3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437013	2541349	2541200	277860	277714	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC8D2.03c	air1	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437014	2541349	2538902	277860	275480	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC13B11.01	air1	adh1	-	adh	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437015	2541349	2541229	277860	277743	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC839.05c	air1	rps1701	-	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437016	2541349	2539764	277860	276315	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC14F5.04c	air1	pgk1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437017	2541349	2541838	277860	278329	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC22A12.04c	air1	rps2201	-	rps15a-1|rps22-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437018	2541349	2541977	277860	278462	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC5D6.01	air1	rps2202	-	rps15a-2|rps22-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437019	2541349	2540767	277860	277287	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC19C2.07	air1	fba1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437020	2541349	2540682	277860	277207	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC800.04c	air1	rpl4301	-	rpl37a-1|rpl43|rpl43-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437021	2541349	2540950	277860	277466	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC365.03c	air1	rpl2101	-	rpl21|rpl21-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437022	2541349	2541130	277860	277645	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC776.11	air1	rpl2801	-	rpl28-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437023	2541349	2542782	277860	279231	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC1687.06c	air1	rpl44	-	rpl28	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437024	2541349	2541570	277860	278067	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC6G9.09c	air1	rpl2401	-	rpl24|rpl24-01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437025	2541349	2542093	277860	278570	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC26A3.04	air1	rpl2002	-	rpl20|rpl20-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437026	2541349	2542725	277860	279176	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC3A12.10	air1	rpl2001	-	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437027	2541349	2540565	277860	277092	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC1D7.04	air1	mlo3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437028	2541349	2540274	277860	276805	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC29B5.03c	air1	rpl26	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437029	2541349	3361377	277860	280453	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAPB17E12.13	air1	rpl1802	-	rpl18-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437030	2541349	2542904	277860	279348	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC144.11	air1	rps1102	-	rps11|rps11-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437031	2541349	2543120	277860	279552	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC31G5.03	air1	rps1101	-	rps11-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437032	2541349	2541156	277860	277671	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC685.07c	air1	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437033	2541349	2539701	277860	276254	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC106.18	air1	rpl2501	-	rpl25a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437034	3361384	2541126	280460	277641	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC651.01c	cid14	nog1	-	SPBC725.18c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437035	3361384	2541274	280460	277788	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBP8B7.20c	cid14	nop2	-	SPBP8B7.20c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437036	3361384	2541383	280460	277894	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBP8B7.16c	cid14	dbp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437037	3361384	2542869	280460	279314	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC140.02	cid14	gar2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437038	3361384	2540479	280460	277007	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC2D10.10c	cid14	fib1	-	fib|nop1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437039	3361384	2542777	280460	279226	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC6F6.03c	cid14	SPAC6F6.03c	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Keller C (2010)	20403971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437042	2543586	2543586	280001	280001	SPAC458.04c	SPAC458.04c	dli1	dli1	dil1	dil1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Rumpf C (2010)	20404563	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437043	2543586	2542678	280001	279131	SPAC458.04c	SPAC29B12.07	dli1	sec16	dil1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Rumpf C (2010)	20404563	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437044	2543586	2540581	280001	277107	SPAC458.04c	SPBC19C7.04c	dli1	SPBC19C7.04c	dil1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Rumpf C (2010)	20404563	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437045	2543586	2542306	280001	278773	SPAC458.04c	SPAC29A4.11	dli1	rga3	dil1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Rumpf C (2010)	20404563	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437046	2543586	2541077	280001	277592	SPAC458.04c	SPBC83.08	dli1	rvb2	dil1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Rumpf C (2010)	20404563	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437047	2543586	2540862	280001	277379	SPAC458.04c	SPBC4C3.06	dli1	syp1	dil1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Rumpf C (2010)	20404563	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437048	2543586	2540357	280001	276886	SPAC458.04c	SPBC2F12.05c	dli1	SPBC2F12.05c	dil1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Rumpf C (2010)	20404563	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437049	2543586	2543080	280001	279513	SPAC458.04c	SPAC3A11.10c	dli1	SPAC3A11.10c	dil1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Rumpf C (2010)	20404563	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437050	2543586	2542843	280001	279289	SPAC458.04c	SPAC13F5.06c	dli1	sec10	dil1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Rumpf C (2010)	20404563	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437087	2541957	2539205	278444	275775	SPAC23C11.16	SPCC4B3.15	plo1	mid1	-	dmf1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Paoletti A (2000)	10930468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
437100	2542632	2541141	279086	277656	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC649.05	cdc25	cut12	sal2	stf1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Bridge AJ (1998)	9531532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
437267	2543597	2539179	280012	275750	SPAC4A8.12c	SPCC31H12.05c	sds22	sds21	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ohkura H (1991)	1846086	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
437268	2543597	2541117	280012	277632	SPAC4A8.12c	SPBC646.13	sds22	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ohkura H (1991)	1846086	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
437269	2541193	2543597	277707	280012	SPBC776.02c	SPAC4A8.12c	dis2	sds22	bws1|sds1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ohkura H (1991)	1846086	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein activity:undetermined	Overexpression of SDS22 causes increased PP1 activity in a BWS1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
437288	2540679	2543565	277204	279981	SPBC3D6.10	SPAPB24D3.04c	apn2	mag1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Alseth I (2005)	15722486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	double mutants show decreased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
437289	2543164	2543565	279595	279981	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAPB24D3.04c	rad2	mag1	fen1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Alseth I (2005)	15722486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	double mutants show decreased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
437295	2539517	2542293	276079	278761	SPCC576.15c	SPAC17G8.14c	ksg1	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Graeub R (2003)	14625898	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
437296	2542293	2539517	278761	276079	SPAC17G8.14c	SPCC576.15c	pck1	ksg1	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Graeub R (2003)	14625898	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
437297	2539649	2539517	276204	276079	SPBC12D12.04c	SPCC576.15c	pck2	ksg1	pkc1|sts6	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Graeub R (2003)	14625898	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
437298	2540458	2541326	276986	277838	SPBC29A10.14	SPBP35G2.03c	rec8	sgo1	-	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Kitajima TS (2004)	14730319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation|inviable	Overexpression of both REC8 and SGO1 causes lethality	-	BIOGRID
437299	2541633	2542788	278129	279237	SPAC664.01c	SPAC15A10.15	swi6	sgo2	SPAC824.10c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kitajima TS (2004)	14730319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
437301	2541727	2540024	278221	276568	SPAC22H10.12c	SPBP4H10.04	gdi1	ppb1	sec19	SPBC1346.01c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ma Y (2006)	16980382	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	data not shown	-	BIOGRID
437302	2541727	2543671	278221	280085	SPAC22H10.12c	SPAC644.04	gdi1	pct1	sec19	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ma Y (2006)	16980382	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
437308	2539765	2541975	276316	278460	SPBC1778.06c	SPAC20G8.05c	fim1	cdc15	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakano K (2001)	11694585	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
437309	2539765	2543129	276316	279561	SPBC1778.06c	SPAC4F8.13c	fim1	rng2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakano K (2001)	11694585	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
437310	2542858	2540176	279304	276709	SPAC13G6.12c	SPBC1709.01	chs1	chs2	SPAC24B11.01c	SPBC1734.17	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Matsuo Y (2004)	15277753	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
437312	2543118	2541270	279550	277784	SPAC3G6.11	SPBC902.02c	chl1	ctf18	-	chl12	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ansbach AB (2008)	18045993	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
437313	2543118	2539447	279550	276010	SPAC3G6.11	SPCC338.17c	chl1	rad21	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ansbach AB (2008)	18045993	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	stress resistance	-	-	BIOGRID
437314	2540728	2541620	277251	278117	SPBC216.06c	SPAC2G11.12	swi1	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ansbach AB (2008)	18045993	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
437315	2540728	2541270	277251	277784	SPBC216.06c	SPBC902.02c	swi1	ctf18	-	chl12	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ansbach AB (2008)	18045993	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
437317	2538794	2540679	275375	277204	SPCC622.17	SPBC3D6.10	apn1	apn2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ribar B (2004)	14704348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
437318	2540679	2540345	277204	276874	SPBC3D6.10	SPBC19C7.09c	apn2	uve1	-	uvde	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ribar B (2004)	14704348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
437330	2542988	2542873	279426	279318	SPAC1006.09	SPAC9G1.02	win1	wis4	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	wak1|wik1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Shieh JC (1998)	9450957	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	in a cdc25 background	-	BIOGRID
437331	2542988	2541055	279426	277570	SPAC1006.09	SPBC409.07c	win1	wis1	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	smf2|spc2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Shieh JC (1998)	9450957	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	in a cdc25 background	-	BIOGRID
437332	2541055	2542873	277570	279318	SPBC409.07c	SPAC9G1.02	wis1	wis4	smf2|spc2	wak1|wik1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Shieh JC (1998)	9450957	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	auxotrophy:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
437333	2541055	2541652	277570	278148	SPBC409.07c	SPAC24B11.06c	wis1	sty1	smf2|spc2	phh1|spc1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Shieh JC (1998)	9450957	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	auxotrophy:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
437334	2541055	2542988	277570	279426	SPBC409.07c	SPAC1006.09	wis1	win1	smf2|spc2	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Shieh JC (1998)	9450957	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	auxotrophy:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
437335	2542988	2542873	279426	279318	SPAC1006.09	SPAC9G1.02	win1	wis4	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	wak1|wik1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Shieh JC (1998)	9450957	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation|resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
437350	2542757	2541051	279207	277566	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC3E7.08c	mre11	rad13	rad32	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tavassoli M (1995)	7885834	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
437353	2541055	2542344	277570	278810	SPBC409.07c	SPAC1751.01c	wis1	gti1	smf2|spc2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Caspari T (1997)	9372449	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient uptake:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
437362	2540244	2541620	276776	278117	SPBC336.01	SPAC2G11.12	fbh1	rqh1	fdh|fdh1	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Osman F (2005)	16135800	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	data not shown	-	BIOGRID
437363	2543577	2543580	279992	279995	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC644.14c	srs2	rad51	-	rhp51	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Osman F (2005)	16135800	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	Mutation of rad51 rescues the growth defect seen in an srs2/fbh1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
437364	2541620	2543685	278117	280099	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC3C7.03c	rqh1	rad55	hus2|rad12|rec9	rhp55	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Osman F (2005)	16135800	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	Mutation of rhp55 rescues the growth defect seen in a hus2/fbh1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
437383	2539669	2540582	276224	277108	SPBC11C11.04c	SPBC26H8.07c	alp1	nda3	-	alp12|ben1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Hirata D (1998)	9450991	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
437420	2475	2539480	108757	276043	-	SPCC622.13c	MTOR	tti1	FRAP|FRAP1|FRAP2|RAFT1|RAPT1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kaizuka T (2010)	20427287	9606	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
437437	2540825	2540458	277343	276986	SPBC428.08c	SPBC29A10.14	clr4	rec8	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ellermeier C (2010)	20421495	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic recombination:partial rescue	double mutant shows decreased recombination in centromeric regions compared to clr4 single mutants	-	BIOGRID
437438	2540825	2541688	277343	278184	SPBC428.08c	SPAC25G10.04c	clr4	rec10	-	rec20	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ellermeier C (2010)	20421495	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic recombination:partial rescue	double mutant shows decreased recombination in centromeric regions compared to clr4 single mutants	-	BIOGRID
437439	2540821	2538930	277339	275506	SPBC800.03	SPCC188.13c	clr3	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ellermeier C (2010)	20421495	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic recombination	double mutant shows increased recombination in centromeric regions	-	BIOGRID
437440	2541633	2540047	278129	276585	SPAC664.01c	SPBC16C6.10	swi6	chp2	SPAC824.10c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ellermeier C (2010)	20421495	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic recombination	double mutant shows increased recombination in centromeric regions	-	BIOGRID
437441	2538930	2542150	275506	278626	SPCC188.13c	SPAC17A5.11	dcr1	rec12	SPCC584.10c	spo11	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ellermeier C (2010)	20421495	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic recombination:wild type	double mutant shows decreased recombination in centromeric regions compared to dcr1 single mutant	-	BIOGRID
437490	2542632	2540013	279086	276557	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC14C8.07c	cdc25	cdc18	sal2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yanow SK (2001)	11532929	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
437651	2540234	2542388	276766	278852	SPBC336.12c	SPAC1834.06c	cdc10	pmo25	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kanai M (2005)	16096637	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	double mutants show an abnormal round cell shape	-	BIOGRID
437652	2540234	2539963	276766	276507	SPBC336.12c	SPBC17F3.02	cdc10	nak1	-	mor4|orb3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kanai M (2005)	16096637	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	double mutants show an abnormal round cell shape	-	BIOGRID
437653	2540234	2541317	276766	277829	SPBC336.12c	SPBP19A11.04c	cdc10	mor2	-	cps12	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kanai M (2005)	16096637	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	double mutants show an abnormal round cell shape	-	BIOGRID
437654	2542632	2542388	279086	278852	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC1834.06c	cdc25	pmo25	sal2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kanai M (2005)	16096637	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology	double mutants show abnormal F actin localization	-	BIOGRID
437655	2542632	2539963	279086	276507	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC17F3.02	cdc25	nak1	sal2	mor4|orb3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kanai M (2005)	16096637	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology	double mutants show abnormal F actin localization	-	BIOGRID
437656	2542632	2541317	279086	277829	SPAC24H6.05	SPBP19A11.04c	cdc25	mor2	sal2	cps12	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kanai M (2005)	16096637	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology	double mutants show abnormal F actin localization	-	BIOGRID
437664	2542814	2540936	279261	277452	SPAC13D6.05	SPBC800.05c	alp11	atb2	SPAC4G9.01	alp2|ban5|tub1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Radcliffe PA (1999)	10473641	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
438023	2539123	2539537	275695	276099	SPCC18B5.03	SPCP1E11.04c	wee1	pal1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ge W (2005)	15975911	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
438038	2542313	2540060	278779	276598	SPAC16A10.07c	SPBC106.01	taz1	mph1	myb|myb1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Miller KM (2003)	12620220	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
438039	2542313	2539087	278779	275659	SPAC16A10.07c	SPCC1259.13	taz1	chk1	myb|myb1	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Miller KM (2003)	12620220	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
438040	2542174	3361454	278649	280530	SPAC17A5.06	SPAC1D4.14	ptr8	tho2	ercc3sp	SPAC22F3.14c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Mizuki F (2007)	17212653	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
438079	2539923	3361269	276467	280345	SPBC1539.04	SPBC31A8.01c	tts1	rtn1	-	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Co-purification	physical	Zhang D (2010)	20434336	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
438083	2539923	3361269	276467	280345	SPBC1539.04	SPBC31A8.01c	tts1	rtn1	-	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Zhang D (2010)	20434336	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology|protein/peptide distribution	-	-	BIOGRID
438084	2539171	3361269	275742	280345	SPCC830.08c	SPBC31A8.01c	yop1	rtn1	-	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Zhang D (2010)	20434336	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology|protein/peptide distribution	-	-	BIOGRID
438085	2539923	2539171	276467	275742	SPBC1539.04	SPCC830.08c	tts1	yop1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Zhang D (2010)	20434336	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology|protein/peptide distribution	-	-	BIOGRID
438086	2541313	2538726	277825	275310	SPBP26C9.02c	SPCC777.09c	car1	arg1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mercier A (2010)	20435771	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	ARG1/CAR1/CAR3 triple mutants show increased sensitivity to DIP than ARG1 mutants or CAR1/CAR3 double mutants	-	BIOGRID
438087	2543377	2538726	279799	275310	SPAC3H1.07	SPCC777.09c	aru1	arg1	car3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mercier A (2010)	20435771	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	ARG1/CAR1/CAR3 triple mutants show increased sensitivity to DIP than ARG1 mutants or CAR1/CAR3 double mutants	-	BIOGRID
438088	2541313	2543377	277825	279799	SPBP26C9.02c	SPAC3H1.07	car1	aru1	-	car3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Mercier A (2010)	20435771	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein activity	ARG1/CAR1/CAR3 triple mutants show increased sensitivity to DIP than ARG1 mutants or CAR1/CAR3 double mutants	-	BIOGRID
438096	2539639	2543351	276194	279773	SPBC106.09	SPAC8C9.03	cut4	cgs1	apc1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yamashita YM (1996)	8918880	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
438120	2542366	2543565	278830	279981	SPAC1783.04c	SPAPB24D3.04c	hst4	mag1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Haldar D (2008)	18344406	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutant shows increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
438121	2542366	2540679	278830	277204	SPAC1783.04c	SPBC3D6.10	hst4	apn2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Haldar D (2008)	18344406	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutant shows increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
438122	2542366	2543164	278830	279595	SPAC1783.04c	SPAC3G6.06c	hst4	rad2	-	fen1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Haldar D (2008)	18344406	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutant shows increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
438123	2542366	2541051	278830	277566	SPAC1783.04c	SPBC3E7.08c	hst4	rad13	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Haldar D (2008)	18344406	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutant shows increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
438124	2542366	2541635	278830	278131	SPAC1783.04c	SPAC1556.01c	hst4	rad50	-	SPAP4C9.01c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Haldar D (2008)	18344406	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutant shows increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
438142	2542123	2540060	278599	276598	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC106.01	mal3	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Asakawa K (2005)	16179942	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
438174	2540768	2543402	277288	279824	SPBC1D7.02c	SPAC630.14c	scr1	tup12	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Janoo RT (2001)	11238405	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	-	-	BIOGRID
438175	2540768	2542299	277288	278766	SPBC1D7.02c	SPAC18B11.10	scr1	tup11	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Janoo RT (2001)	11238405	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	-	-	BIOGRID
438176	2543351	2543402	279773	279824	SPAC8C9.03	SPAC630.14c	cgs1	tup12	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Janoo RT (2001)	11238405	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
438177	2542299	2541055	278766	277570	SPAC18B11.10	SPBC409.07c	tup11	wis1	-	smf2|spc2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Janoo RT (2001)	11238405	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
438178	2543402	2541055	279824	277570	SPAC630.14c	SPBC409.07c	tup12	wis1	-	smf2|spc2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Janoo RT (2001)	11238405	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
438179	2543351	2540133	279773	276670	SPAC8C9.03	SPBC3B8.02	cgs1	php5	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Janoo RT (2001)	11238405	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:undetermined	text only	-	BIOGRID
438180	2542299	2540329	278766	276859	SPAC18B11.10	SPBC29B5.01	tup11	atf1	-	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Janoo RT (2001)	11238405	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue	deletion of atf1 partially derepresses transcription of fbp1 seen in tup11/tup12 double mutants	-	BIOGRID
438181	2543402	2540329	279824	276859	SPAC630.14c	SPBC29B5.01	tup12	atf1	-	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Janoo RT (2001)	11238405	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue	deletion of atf1 partially derepresses transcription of fbp1 seen in tup11/tup12 double mutants	-	BIOGRID
438182	2542299	2542047	278766	278528	SPAC18B11.10	SPAC21E11.03c	tup11	pcr1	-	mts2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Janoo RT (2001)	11238405	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue	deletion of mts2 partially derepresses transcription of fbp1 seen in tup11/tup12 double mutants	-	BIOGRID
438183	2543402	2542047	279824	278528	SPAC630.14c	SPAC21E11.03c	tup12	pcr1	-	mts2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Janoo RT (2001)	11238405	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue	deletion of mts2 partially derepresses transcription of fbp1 seen in tup11/tup12 double mutants	-	BIOGRID
438184	2542299	2541055	278766	277570	SPAC18B11.10	SPBC409.07c	tup11	wis1	-	smf2|spc2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Janoo RT (2001)	11238405	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue	deletion of smf2 partially derepresses transcription of fbp1 seen in tup11/tup12 double mutants	-	BIOGRID
438185	2543402	2541055	279824	277570	SPAC630.14c	SPBC409.07c	tup12	wis1	-	smf2|spc2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Janoo RT (2001)	11238405	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue	deletion of smf2 partially derepresses transcription of fbp1 seen in tup11/tup12 double mutants	-	BIOGRID
438186	2542299	2543351	278766	279773	SPAC18B11.10	SPAC8C9.03	tup11	cgs1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Janoo RT (2001)	11238405	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue	deletion of cgs1 partially derepresses transcription of fbp1 seen in tup11/tup12 double mutants	-	BIOGRID
438187	2543402	2543351	279824	279773	SPAC630.14c	SPAC8C9.03	tup12	cgs1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Janoo RT (2001)	11238405	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue	deletion of csg1 partially derepresses transcription of fbp1 seen in tup11/tup12 double mutants	-	BIOGRID
438188	2542299	2540133	278766	276670	SPAC18B11.10	SPBC3B8.02	tup11	php5	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Janoo RT (2001)	11238405	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue	deletion of php5 partially derepresses transcription of fbp1 seen in tup11/tup12 double mutants	-	BIOGRID
438189	2543402	2540133	279824	276670	SPAC630.14c	SPBC3B8.02	tup12	php5	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Janoo RT (2001)	11238405	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue	deletion of php5 partially derepresses transcription of fbp1 seen in tup11/tup12 double mutants	-	BIOGRID
438190	2539781	2540133	276331	276670	SPBC106.10	SPBC3B8.02	pka1	php5	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Janoo RT (2001)	11238405	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue	deletion of php5 partially derepresses transcription of fbp1	-	BIOGRID
438215	2541652	2542558	278148	279014	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC1952.07	sty1	rad1	phh1|spc1	rad19	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Alao JP (2010)	20444100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
438216	2539869	2542632	276415	279086	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC24H6.05	cdc2	cdc25	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	sal2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Alao JP (2010)	20444100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to HU compared to CDC2 mutants	-	BIOGRID
438217	2541652	2542558	278148	279014	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC1952.07	sty1	rad1	phh1|spc1	rad19	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Alao JP (2010)	20444100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	bud morphology	double mutants show abnormal septation compared to a rad1 single mutant	-	BIOGRID
438218	2539027	2542558	275600	279014	SPCC1322.08	SPAC1952.07	srk1	rad1	mkp1	rad19	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Alao JP (2010)	20444100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	bud morphology	double mutants show abnormal septation compared to a rad1 single mutant	-	BIOGRID
438219	2542558	2539027	279014	275600	SPAC1952.07	SPCC1322.08	rad1	srk1	rad19	mkp1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Alao JP (2010)	20444100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show slighly increased sensitivity to UV when combined with KCl than rad1 single mutants	-	BIOGRID
438220	2542558	2541982	279014	278467	SPAC1952.07	SPAC23A1.06c	rad1	cmk2	rad19	mkp2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Alao JP (2010)	20444100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show slighly increased sensitivity to UV when combined with KCl than rad1 single mutants	-	BIOGRID
438221	2542558	2540589	279014	277115	SPAC1952.07	SPBC20F10.06	rad1	mad2	rad19	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Alao JP (2010)	20444100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation	-	-	BIOGRID
438470	3361306	2538959	280382	275533	SPBC6B1.09c	SPCC18B5.11c	nbs1	cds1	slr10	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Willis N (2010)	20065069	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression|resistance to chemicals	double mutant shows a defect in cell cycle progression slowing in response to MMS	-	BIOGRID
438471	3361306	2543580	280382	279995	SPBC6B1.09c	SPAC644.14c	nbs1	rad51	slr10	rhp51	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Willis N (2010)	20065069	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	deletion of rhp51 gives a reduced phenotype in cell cycle progression slowing in response to MMS compared to an nbs1/sfr1 double mutant|double mutant shows a reduced phenotype in cell cycle progression slowing in response to MMS compared to an nbs1 single mutant	-	BIOGRID
438472	2542757	2543580	279207	279995	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC644.14c	mre11	rad51	rad32	rhp51	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Willis N (2010)	20065069	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	double mutant shows a reduced phenotype in cell cycle progression slowing in response to MMS compared to a single mutant	-	BIOGRID
438473	2541635	2543580	278131	279995	SPAC1556.01c	SPAC644.14c	rad50	rad51	SPAP4C9.01c	rhp51	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Willis N (2010)	20065069	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	double mutant shows a reduced phenotype in cell cycle progression slowing in response to MMS compared to a single mutant	-	BIOGRID
438474	3361306	2540728	280382	277251	SPBC6B1.09c	SPBC216.06c	nbs1	swi1	slr10	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Willis N (2010)	20065069	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	double mutant shows a reduced phenotype in cell cycle progression slowing in response to MMS compared to a single mutant	-	BIOGRID
438475	3361306	2540584	280382	277110	SPBC6B1.09c	SPBC28F2.07	nbs1	sfr1	slr10	dds20|mug13	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Willis N (2010)	20065069	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression|resistance to chemicals	double mutant shows an enhanced phenotype in cell cycle progression slowing in response to MMS compared to a single mutant	-	BIOGRID
438476	2540584	2543580	277110	279995	SPBC28F2.07	SPAC644.14c	sfr1	rad51	dds20|mug13	rhp51	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Willis N (2010)	20065069	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	deletion of rhp51 gives a reduced phenotype in cell cycle progression slowing in response to MMS compared to an nbs1/sfr1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
438479	2543346	2542789	279768	279238	SPAC688.14	SPAC15E1.03	set13	rpl42	-	rpl36a	Biochemical Activity	physical	Shirai A (2010)	20444689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Methylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
438480	2542789	2540500	279238	277028	SPAC15E1.03	SPBC36B7.09	rpl42	gcn2	rpl36a	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Shirai A (2010)	20444689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	double mutant shows better growth in high NaCl conditions than either single mutant	-	BIOGRID
438546	2540992	2541051	277508	277566	SPBC342.05	SPBC3E7.08c	crb2	rad13	rhp9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Willson J (1997)	9153313	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
438547	2540992	2543164	277508	279595	SPBC342.05	SPAC3G6.06c	crb2	rad2	rhp9	fen1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Willson J (1997)	9153313	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
438548	2540992	2539442	277508	276005	SPBC342.05	SPCC5E4.04	crb2	cut1	rhp9	ptr4	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Willson J (1997)	9153313	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
438556	2540728	2539285	277251	275853	SPBC216.06c	SPCC1672.02c	swi1	sap1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Noguchi C (2007)	17151242	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
438557	2541051	2540345	277566	276874	SPBC3E7.08c	SPBC19C7.09c	rad13	uve1	-	uvde	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi C (2007)	17151242	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
438558	2541051	2539285	277566	275853	SPBC3E7.08c	SPCC1672.02c	rad13	sap1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi C (2007)	17151242	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	Deletion of SAP1 increases the sensitivity of rad13/uvde mutants to UV radiation	-	BIOGRID
438559	2540345	2539285	276874	275853	SPBC19C7.09c	SPCC1672.02c	uve1	sap1	uvde	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi C (2007)	17151242	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	Deletion of SAP1 increases the sensitivity of rad13/uvde mutants to UV radiation	-	BIOGRID
438560	2539285	2538959	275853	275533	SPCC1672.02c	SPCC18B5.11c	sap1	cds1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi C (2007)	17151242	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
439086	2539666	2539547	276221	276108	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC553.07c	eso1	kpa1	-	mug40|pol(kappa)|pol-kappa	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Coulon S (2010)	20453833	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	ESO1/KPA1/REV3/REV1 shows synthetic defect in the repair of translesion DNA sequences	-	BIOGRID
439087	2539666	2543358	276221	279780	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC688.10	eso1	rev3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Coulon S (2010)	20453833	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	ESO1/KPA1/REV3/REV1 shows synthetic defect in the repair of translesion DNA sequences	-	BIOGRID
439088	2539666	2539723	276221	276276	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC1347.01c	eso1	rev1	-	SPBC215.16c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Coulon S (2010)	20453833	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	ESO1/KPA1/REV3/REV1 shows synthetic defect in the repair of translesion DNA sequences	-	BIOGRID
439089	2539547	2543358	276108	279780	SPCC553.07c	SPAC688.10	kpa1	rev3	mug40|pol(kappa)|pol-kappa	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Coulon S (2010)	20453833	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	ESO1/KPA1/REV3/REV1 shows synthetic defect in the repair of translesion DNA sequences	-	BIOGRID
439090	2539547	2539723	276108	276276	SPCC553.07c	SPBC1347.01c	kpa1	rev1	mug40|pol(kappa)|pol-kappa	SPBC215.16c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Coulon S (2010)	20453833	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	ESO1/KPA1/REV3/REV1 shows synthetic defect in the repair of translesion DNA sequences	-	BIOGRID
439091	2543358	2539723	279780	276276	SPAC688.10	SPBC1347.01c	rev3	rev1	-	SPBC215.16c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Coulon S (2010)	20453833	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	ESO1/KPA1/REV3/REV1 shows synthetic defect in the repair of translesion DNA sequences	-	BIOGRID
439092	2539666	3361391	276221	280467	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC13G6.01c	eso1	rad8	-	SPAC5H10.14c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Coulon S (2010)	20453833	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	double mutant shows synthetic defect in the repair of translesion DNA sequences	-	BIOGRID
439093	2539666	2539686	276221	276241	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC1734.06	eso1	rhp18	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Coulon S (2010)	20453833	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	double mutant shows synthetic defect in the repair of translesion DNA sequences	-	BIOGRID
439095	2538726	2540626	275310	277152	SPCC777.09c	SPBC21C3.08c	arg1	car2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bicho CC (2010)	20460254	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	ARG1/Lys3/CAR2 triple mutant shows increased sensitivity to NH4Cl	-	BIOGRID
439096	2541500	2540626	278002	277152	SPAC227.18	SPBC21C3.08c	lys3	car2	SPAC2F7.01	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bicho CC (2010)	20460254	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	ARG1/Lys3/CAR2 triple mutant shows increased sensitivity to NH4Cl	-	BIOGRID
439097	2538726	2541500	275310	278002	SPCC777.09c	SPAC227.18	arg1	lys3	-	SPAC2F7.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bicho CC (2010)	20460254	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	ARG1/Lys3/CAR2 triple mutant shows increased sensitivity to NH4Cl	-	BIOGRID
439102	2540020	2541030	276564	277545	SPBC16D10.09	SPBC337.08c	pcn1	ubi4	pcn	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ramasubramanyan S (2010)	20452294	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
441572	2543583	2542256	279998	278726	SPAC644.12	SPAC29A4.08c	cdc5	prp19	-	cwf8	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Vander Kooi CW (2010)	20462492	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
441795	2540234	2542395	276766	278859	SPBC336.12c	SPAC1805.05	cdc10	cki3	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Koyano T (2010)	20501954	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	bipolar budding pattern:partial rescue|septum formation:partial rescue	deletion of the hit gene partially rescues the bipolar septum formation aberrant in a cdc10 mutant	-	BIOGRID
441796	2540234	2539206	276766	275776	SPBC336.12c	SPCC24B10.07	cdc10	gad8	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Koyano T (2010)	20501954	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	bipolar budding pattern:partial rescue|septum formation:partial rescue	deletion of the hit gene partially rescues the bipolar septum formation aberrant in a cdc10 mutant	-	BIOGRID
441797	2540234	2539366	276766	275932	SPBC336.12c	SPCC16C4.11	cdc10	pef1	-	p31	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Koyano T (2010)	20501954	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	bipolar budding pattern:partial rescue|septum formation:partial rescue	deletion of the hit gene partially rescues the bipolar septum formation aberrant in a cdc10 mutant	-	BIOGRID
441798	2540234	2543071	276766	279504	SPBC336.12c	SPAC3C7.06c	cdc10	pit1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Koyano T (2010)	20501954	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	bipolar budding pattern:partial rescue|septum formation:partial rescue	deletion of the hit gene partially rescues the bipolar septum formation aberrant in a cdc10 mutant	-	BIOGRID
441799	2540234	2539996	276766	276540	SPBC336.12c	SPBC119.07	cdc10	ppk19	-	vps15	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Koyano T (2010)	20501954	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	bipolar budding pattern:partial rescue|septum formation:partial rescue	deletion of the hit gene partially rescues the bipolar septum formation aberrant in a cdc10 mutant	-	BIOGRID
441806	2542123	2542162	278599	278638	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC6F6.08c	mal3	cdc16	-	bub2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Goldstone S (2010)	20498706	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
441807	2542123	2540589	278599	277115	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC20F10.06	mal3	mad2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Goldstone S (2010)	20498706	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
441808	2539857	2542162	276404	278638	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC6F6.08c	tea2	cdc16	klp4	bub2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Goldstone S (2010)	20498706	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
441809	2539857	2540589	276404	277115	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC20F10.06	tea2	mad2	klp4	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Goldstone S (2010)	20498706	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
441810	2543044	2542162	279479	278638	SPAC3C7.12	SPAC6F6.08c	tip1	cdc16	noc1	bub2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Goldstone S (2010)	20498706	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
441811	2543044	2540589	279479	277115	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC20F10.06	tip1	mad2	noc1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Goldstone S (2010)	20498706	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
441812	2543044	2539857	279479	276404	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC1604.20c	tip1	tea2	noc1	klp4	Co-localization	physical	Goldstone S (2010)	20498706	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
442462	5802740	2541099	857878	277614	SPNCRNA.103	SPBC646.04	sme2	pla1	SPNCRNA.1341	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Yamanaka S (2010)	20512112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
442463	5802740	2539733	857878	276285	SPNCRNA.103	SPBC16E9.12c	sme2	pab2	SPNCRNA.1341	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Yamanaka S (2010)	20512112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
442464	2543630	2541099	280044	277614	SPAC1F3.01	SPBC646.04	rrp6	pla1	SPAC3H8.11	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yamanaka S (2010)	20512112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	-	-	BIOGRID
442465	2543630	2539540	280044	276102	SPAC1F3.01	SPCC736.12c	rrp6	mmi1	SPAC3H8.11	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yamanaka S (2010)	20512112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	-	-	BIOGRID
442466	2539540	2539733	276102	276285	SPCC736.12c	SPBC16E9.12c	mmi1	pab2	-	-	PCA	physical	Yamanaka S (2010)	20512112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
442467	2539540	2539733	276102	276285	SPCC736.12c	SPBC16E9.12c	mmi1	pab2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yamanaka S (2010)	20512112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
442468	2539540	2541099	276102	277614	SPCC736.12c	SPBC646.04	mmi1	pla1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yamanaka S (2010)	20512112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
442584	2542259	5802965	278728	858103	SPAC17H9.11	SPAC11H11.06	gmf1	arp2	-	SPAC22F8.01	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nakano K (2010)	20517925	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
442585	2542259	2543233	278728	279661	SPAC17H9.11	SPAC630.03	gmf1	arp3	-	act2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nakano K (2010)	20517925	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
442586	2542259	2542287	278728	278755	SPAC17H9.11	SPAC6F6.10c	gmf1	arc2	-	arc34	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nakano K (2010)	20517925	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
442587	5802965	2542259	858103	278728	SPAC11H11.06	SPAC17H9.11	arp2	gmf1	SPAC22F8.01	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakano K (2010)	20517925	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology:partial rescue	Overexpression of SPAC17H9.11 suppresses polymerization of actin induced by overexpressing ARP2/ARP3|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
442588	2543233	2542259	279661	278728	SPAC630.03	SPAC17H9.11	arp3	gmf1	act2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakano K (2010)	20517925	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology:partial rescue	Overexpression of SPAC17H9.11 suppresses polymerization of actin induced by overexpressing ARP2/ARP3|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
442589	2543233	2542259	279661	278728	SPAC630.03	SPAC17H9.11	arp3	gmf1	act2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nakano K (2010)	20517925	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
442590	2543233	2542259	279661	278728	SPAC630.03	SPAC17H9.11	arp3	gmf1	act2	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Nakano K (2010)	20517925	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
442591	2541738	2542259	278232	278728	SPAC20G4.06c	SPAC17H9.11	adf1	gmf1	cof1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakano K (2010)	20517925	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology:partial rescue	Cells lacking gmf1 show slower rate of actin depolymerization than ADF1 single mutants	-	BIOGRID
442592	2541738	2542259	278232	278728	SPAC20G4.06c	SPAC17H9.11	adf1	gmf1	cof1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakano K (2010)	20517925	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
442593	5802965	63985	858103	211011	SPAC11H11.06	-	arp2	Gmfb	SPAC22F8.01	3110001H22Rik|3110001O16Rik|AI851627|C79176|D14Ertd630e	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakano K (2010)	20517925	284812	10090	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology:undetermined	Presence causes a decrease in the polymerization of actin seen by the ARP2/3 complex|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
442594	2543233	63986	279661	211012	SPAC630.03	-	arp3	Gmfg	act2	0610039G16Rik|2310057N07Rik|AI324845	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakano K (2010)	20517925	284812	10090	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology:undetermined	Presence causes a decrease in the polymerization of actin seen by the ARP2/3 complex|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
442595	5802965	851635	858103	32118	SPAC11H11.06	YDR063W	arp2	AIM7	SPAC22F8.01	GMF1|GMF	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakano K (2010)	20517925	284812	559292	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology:undetermined	Presence causes a decrease in the polymerization of actin seen by the ARP2/3 complex|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
442596	2543233	851635	279661	32118	SPAC630.03	YDR063W	arp3	AIM7	act2	GMF1|GMF	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakano K (2010)	20517925	284812	559292	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology:undetermined	Presence causes a decrease in the polymerization of actin seen by the ARP2/3 complex|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
442597	2543233	63985	279661	211011	SPAC630.03	-	arp3	Gmfb	act2	3110001H22Rik|3110001O16Rik|AI851627|C79176|D14Ertd630e	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakano K (2010)	20517925	284812	10090	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology:undetermined	Presence causes a decrease in the polymerization of actin seen by the ARP2/3 complex|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
442598	5802965	63986	858103	211012	SPAC11H11.06	-	arp2	Gmfg	SPAC22F8.01	0610039G16Rik|2310057N07Rik|AI324845	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakano K (2010)	20517925	284812	10090	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology:undetermined	Presence causes a decrease in the polymerization of actin seen by the ARP2/3 complex|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
442599	2539087	2541265	275659	277779	SPCC1259.13	SPBP16F5.03c	chk1	tra1	rad27	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Calonge TM (2010)	20194963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type	mutation of the hit protein rescues the growth arrest seen in a chk1 overexpression background	-	BIOGRID
442600	2541265	2540821	277779	277339	SPBP16F5.03c	SPBC800.03	tra1	clr3	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Calonge TM (2010)	20194963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type	deletion of the hit protein blocks the ability of tra1 to alleviate chk1 induced cell cycle arrest	-	BIOGRID
442601	2541265	2540368	277779	276897	SPBP16F5.03c	SPBC36.05c	tra1	clr6	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Calonge TM (2010)	20194963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type	deletion of the hit protein blocks the ability of tra1 to alleviate chk1 induced cell cycle arrest	-	BIOGRID
442602	2541265	2543643	277779	280057	SPBP16F5.03c	SPAC3G9.07c	tra1	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Calonge TM (2010)	20194963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue	deletion of the hit protein partially blocks the ability of tra1 to alleviate chk1 induced cell cycle arrest	-	BIOGRID
442603	2541265	2542366	277779	278830	SPBP16F5.03c	SPAC1783.04c	tra1	hst4	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Calonge TM (2010)	20194963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue	deletion of the hit protein partially blocks the ability of tra1 to alleviate chk1 induced cell cycle arrest	-	BIOGRID
442604	2541265	2541590	277779	278087	SPBP16F5.03c	SPAC57A10.02	tra1	cdr2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Calonge TM (2010)	20194963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type	deletion of the hit protein blocks the ability of tra1 to alleviate chk1 induced cell cycle arrest	-	BIOGRID
442605	2539781	2541652	276331	278148	SPBC106.10	SPAC24B11.06c	pka1	sty1	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	phh1|spc1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Zuin A (2010)	20453258	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
442606	2541867	2541652	278357	278148	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC24B11.06c	sck2	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Zuin A (2010)	20453258	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
442607	2541867	2540329	278357	276859	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC29B5.01	sck2	atf1	-	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Zuin A (2010)	20453258	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
442609	2543351	2542677	279773	279130	SPAC8C9.03	SPAC26F1.10c	cgs1	pyp1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Zuin A (2010)	20453258	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chronological lifespan:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
442610	2541165	2542558	277680	279014	SPBC776.12c	SPAC1952.07	hsk1	rad1	cdc7	rad19	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
442611	2541165	2541643	277680	278139	SPBC776.12c	SPAC14C4.13	hsk1	rad17	cdc7	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
442612	2541165	2540992	277680	277508	SPBC776.12c	SPBC342.05	hsk1	crb2	cdc7	rhp9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
442613	2541165	2540620	277680	277146	SPBC776.12c	SPBC4.04c	hsk1	mcm2	cdc7	cdc19|nda1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
442614	2540728	2540620	277251	277146	SPBC216.06c	SPBC4.04c	swi1	mcm2	-	cdc19|nda1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
442615	3361323	2540620	280399	277146	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC4.04c	swi3	mcm2	-	cdc19|nda1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
442616	3361323	2541194	280399	277708	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC725.13c	swi3	psf2	-	bsh3|dre13	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
442617	2540728	2541194	277251	277708	SPBC216.06c	SPBC725.13c	swi1	psf2	-	bsh3|dre13	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
442618	2540728	2541620	277251	278117	SPBC216.06c	SPAC2G11.12	swi1	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
442619	3361323	2541620	280399	278117	SPBC30D10.04	SPAC2G11.12	swi3	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
442620	2541165	2543580	277680	279995	SPBC776.12c	SPAC644.14c	hsk1	rad51	cdc7	rhp51	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
442621	2540728	2539447	277251	276010	SPBC216.06c	SPCC338.17c	swi1	rad21	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
442622	3361323	2539447	280399	276010	SPBC30D10.04	SPCC338.17c	swi3	rad21	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
442623	2540728	2541633	277251	278129	SPBC216.06c	SPAC664.01c	swi1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
442624	2541165	2538959	277680	275533	SPBC776.12c	SPCC18B5.11c	hsk1	cds1	cdc7	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
442625	2541165	2543240	277680	279668	SPBC776.12c	SPAC694.06c	hsk1	mrc1	cdc7	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
442626	2540728	2541165	277251	277680	SPBC216.06c	SPBC776.12c	swi1	hsk1	-	cdc7	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable|resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
442627	3361323	2541165	280399	277680	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC776.12c	swi3	hsk1	-	cdc7	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
442628	3361323	2539686	280399	276241	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC1734.06	swi3	rhp18	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
442629	2540728	2539686	277251	276241	SPBC216.06c	SPBC1734.06	swi1	rhp18	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
442630	2541165	2539686	277680	276241	SPBC776.12c	SPBC1734.06	hsk1	rhp18	cdc7	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
442631	2541165	2542925	277680	279366	SPBC776.12c	SPAC11E3.04c	hsk1	ubc13	cdc7	spu13|sst5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutant shows increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
442632	2543577	2541165	279992	277680	SPAC4H3.05	SPBC776.12c	srs2	hsk1	-	cdc7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutant shows increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
442633	2539686	2541165	276241	277680	SPBC1734.06	SPBC776.12c	rhp18	hsk1	-	cdc7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutant shows increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
442634	2540020	2541165	276564	277680	SPBC16D10.09	SPBC776.12c	pcn1	hsk1	pcn	cdc7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutant shows increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
442635	2539666	2541165	276221	277680	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC776.12c	eso1	hsk1	-	cdc7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutant shows increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
442636	2543358	2541165	279780	277680	SPAC688.10	SPBC776.12c	rev3	hsk1	-	cdc7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutant shows increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
442637	2539399	2540728	275964	277251	SPCC550.13	SPBC216.06c	dfp1	swi1	him1|rad35|dbf4	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutant shows increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
442638	2539399	2543580	275964	279995	SPCC550.13	SPAC644.14c	dfp1	rad51	him1|rad35|dbf4	rhp51	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutant shows increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
442639	2539399	2540020	275964	276564	SPCC550.13	SPBC16D10.09	dfp1	pcn1	him1|rad35|dbf4	pcn	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutant shows increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
442640	2539399	2539686	275964	276241	SPCC550.13	SPBC1734.06	dfp1	rhp18	him1|rad35|dbf4	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutant shows increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
442641	2539399	2538720	275964	275304	SPCC550.13	SPCC338.05c	dfp1	mms2	him1|rad35|dbf4	spm2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutant shows increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
442642	2539399	2543577	275964	279992	SPCC550.13	SPAC4H3.05	dfp1	srs2	him1|rad35|dbf4	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dolan WP (2010)	20176980	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutant shows increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
445152	2539020	2540541	275593	277068	SPCC5E4.06	SPBC1A4.03c	smc6	top2	rad18	ptr11	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tapia-Alveal C (2010)	20495382	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
445153	2542313	2540541	278779	277068	SPAC16A10.07c	SPBC1A4.03c	taz1	top2	myb|myb1	ptr11	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tapia-Alveal C (2010)	20495382	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable:wild type|telomere length:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
445154	3361521	2540580	280597	277106	SPAC1610.03c	SPBC19C2.05	crp79	ran1	meu5	pat1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable:wild type|telomere length:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
445159	2538706	3361306	275290	280382	SPCC338.08	SPBC6B1.09c	ctp1	nbs1	mug38|nip1|slr9	slr10	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dodson GE (2010)	20421724	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
445491	2542299	2543402	278766	279824	SPAC18B11.10	SPAC630.14c	tup11	tup12	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ferreira ME (2010)	20544037	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	Addition of a TUP11-12 fusion protein rescues growth in a tup11 or tup12 mutant in the presence of calcium chloride	-	BIOGRID
445492	2543402	2542299	279824	278766	SPAC630.14c	SPAC18B11.10	tup12	tup11	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ferreira ME (2010)	20544037	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	Addition of a TUP11-12 fusion protein rescues growth in a tup11 or tup12 mutant in the presence of calcium chloride	-	BIOGRID
445493	2542467	13435	278928	199261	SPAC1834.04	-	hht1	Dnmt3a	-	MmuIIIA	Protein-peptide	physical	Dhayalan A (2010)	20547484	284812	10090	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
445494	2541220	13435	277734	199261	SPBC8D2.04	-	hht2	Dnmt3a	h3.2	MmuIIIA	Protein-peptide	physical	Dhayalan A (2010)	20547484	284812	10090	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
445495	13435	2542467	199261	278928	-	SPAC1834.04	Dnmt3a	hht1	MmuIIIA	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dhayalan A (2010)	20547484	10090	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
445496	13435	2541220	199261	277734	-	SPBC8D2.04	Dnmt3a	hht2	MmuIIIA	h3.2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dhayalan A (2010)	20547484	10090	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
445523	2539087	2543289	275659	279714	SPCC1259.13	SPAC9E9.08	chk1	rad26	rad27	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Uchiyama M (1997)	9154809	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
445575	2540565	2539741	277092	276293	SPBC1D7.04	SPBC16A3.05c	mlo3	rae1	-	cut21	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Thakurta AG (2005)	15990877	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
447743	856272	2539727	36317	276279	YPR149W	SPBC1685.13	NCE102	fhn1	NCE2|L000003098	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Loibl M (2010)	20581291	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
448490	2541620	2541071	278117	277586	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC582.05c	rqh1	brc1	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Rozenzhak S (2010)	20661445	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
448491	2541620	2539499	278117	276062	SPAC2G11.12	SPCC622.08c	rqh1	hta1	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Rozenzhak S (2010)	20661445	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
448492	2541620	2542226	278117	278699	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC19G12.06c	rqh1	hta2	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Rozenzhak S (2010)	20661445	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
448494	2540718	2541929	277241	278417	SPBC3H7.15	SPAC23C4.12	hhp1	hhp2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rumpf C (2010)	20581463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nuclear morphology|protein/peptide modification	double mutants show a decrease in phosphorylation of Rec8	-	BIOGRID
448495	2540471	2540292	276999	276823	SPBC19F8.07	SPBC28F2.12	mcs6	rpb1	cdk7|crk1|mop1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Coudreuse D (2010)	20605454	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448496	2540239	2540292	276771	276823	SPBC32H8.10	SPBC28F2.12	cdk9	rpb1	SPACTOKYO_453.22	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Coudreuse D (2010)	20605454	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448497	2541672	2540292	278168	276823	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC28F2.12	lsk1	rpb1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Coudreuse D (2010)	20605454	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448498	2543379	2542683	279801	279136	SPAC821.09	SPAPYUG7.03c	eng1	mid2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Petit CS (2005)	16317047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation	eng1/agn1/mid2 triple mutants show increased abnormalities in septum formation compared to double mutants|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
448499	2543379	3361560	279801	280636	SPAC821.09	SPAC14C4.09	eng1	agn1	-	SPAC14C4.09	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Petit CS (2005)	16317047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation	eng1/agn1/mid2 triple mutants show increased abnormalities in septum formation compared to double mutants|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
448500	2542683	3361560	279136	280636	SPAPYUG7.03c	SPAC14C4.09	mid2	agn1	-	SPAC14C4.09	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Petit CS (2005)	16317047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation	eng1/agn1/mid2 triple mutants show increased abnormalities in septum formation compared to double mutants|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
448501	2540737	2540792	277260	277311	SPBC19G7.05c	SPBC4F6.06	bgs1	kin1	cps1|drc1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Cadou A (2010)	20624220	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
448502	2540019	2540792	276563	277311	SPBC1685.01	SPBC4F6.06	pmp1	kin1	dsp1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Cadou A (2010)	20624220	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
448503	2539920	2540792	276464	277311	SPBC119.08	SPBC4F6.06	pmk1	kin1	spm1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Cadou A (2010)	20624220	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
448504	2540792	2539920	277311	276464	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC119.08	kin1	pmk1	-	spm1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Cadou A (2010)	20624220	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
448505	2540792	2539487	277311	276050	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC895.05	kin1	for3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Cadou A (2010)	20624220	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	endomembrane system morphology	-	-	BIOGRID
448506	2540792	2543336	277311	279759	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC688.11	kin1	end4	-	sla2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Cadou A (2010)	20624220	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	endomembrane system morphology	-	-	BIOGRID
448507	2540792	2539920	277311	276464	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC119.08	kin1	pmk1	-	spm1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Cadou A (2010)	20624220	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	endomembrane system morphology:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
448508	2540792	2539649	277311	276204	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC12D12.04c	kin1	pck2	-	pkc1|sts6	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Cadou A (2010)	20624220	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	endomembrane system morphology:partial rescue|protein/peptide modification:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
448509	2540792	2542293	277311	278761	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC17G8.14c	kin1	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Cadou A (2010)	20624220	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	endomembrane system morphology|protein/peptide modification	-	-	BIOGRID
448510	2540792	2540019	277311	276563	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1685.01	kin1	pmp1	-	dsp1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Cadou A (2010)	20624220	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	endomembrane system morphology|protein/peptide modification	-	-	BIOGRID
448511	2539087	2539087	275659	275659	SPCC1259.13	SPCC1259.13	chk1	chk1	rad27	rad27	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kasahara K (2010)	20639859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448512	2539087	2542632	275659	279086	SPCC1259.13	SPAC24H6.05	chk1	cdc25	rad27	sal2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kasahara K (2010)	20639859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448513	2539087	2542029	275659	278511	SPCC1259.13	SPAC8E11.02c	chk1	rad24	rad27	anr5|sam4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kasahara K (2010)	20639859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448526	2542632	2539087	279086	275659	SPAC24H6.05	SPCC1259.13	cdc25	chk1	sal2	rad27	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kasahara K (2010)	20639859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448527	2539244	2542123	275814	278599	SPCC1672.06c	SPAC18G6.15	asp1	mal3	vip1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Poehlmann J (2010)	20624911	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	invasive growth	-	-	BIOGRID
448528	2539244	2539857	275814	276404	SPCC1672.06c	SPBC1604.20c	asp1	tea2	vip1	klp4	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Poehlmann J (2010)	20624911	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	invasive growth	-	-	BIOGRID
448529	2539244	2539047	275814	275620	SPCC1672.06c	SPCC1223.06	asp1	tea1	vip1	alp8	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Poehlmann J (2010)	20624911	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	invasive growth	-	-	BIOGRID
448530	2539244	2543233	275814	279661	SPCC1672.06c	SPAC630.03	asp1	arp3	vip1	act2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Poehlmann J (2010)	20624911	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	invasive growth	-	-	BIOGRID
448531	2539244	2543399	275814	279821	SPCC1672.06c	SPAC3G9.12	asp1	peg1	vip1	cls1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Poehlmann J (2010)	20624911	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	invasive growth	-	-	BIOGRID
448532	2539244	2539920	275814	276464	SPCC1672.06c	SPBC119.08	asp1	pmk1	vip1	spm1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Poehlmann J (2010)	20624911	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	invasive growth	-	-	BIOGRID
448533	2539244	2541652	275814	278148	SPCC1672.06c	SPAC24B11.06c	asp1	sty1	vip1	phh1|spc1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Poehlmann J (2010)	20624911	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	invasive growth	-	-	BIOGRID
448534	2539733	5802740	276285	857878	SPBC16E9.12c	SPNCRNA.103	pab2	sme2	-	SPNCRNA.1341	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	St-Andre O (2010)	20622014	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	-	-	BIOGRID
448535	2539733	3361384	276285	280460	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC12G12.13c	pab2	cid14	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	St-Andre O (2010)	20622014	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	-	-	BIOGRID
448536	2539733	2540398	276285	276926	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC26H8.10	pab2	dis3	-	rrp44	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	St-Andre O (2010)	20622014	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	-	-	BIOGRID
448537	2539733	2543630	276285	280044	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC1F3.01	pab2	rrp6	-	SPAC3H8.11	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	St-Andre O (2010)	20622014	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	-	-	BIOGRID
448538	2539733	2539540	276285	276102	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC736.12c	pab2	mmi1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	St-Andre O (2010)	20622014	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	-	-	BIOGRID
448539	2539733	2542080	276285	278557	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC27D7.03c	pab2	mei2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	St-Andre O (2010)	20622014	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	-	-	BIOGRID
448540	5802740	2539733	857878	276285	SPNCRNA.103	SPBC16E9.12c	sme2	pab2	SPNCRNA.1341	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	St-Andre O (2010)	20622014	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
448558	2540992	2539499	277508	276062	SPBC342.05	SPCC622.08c	crb2	hta1	rhp9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sofueva S (2010)	20679485	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
448559	2540992	2542226	277508	278699	SPBC342.05	SPAC19G12.06c	crb2	hta2	rhp9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sofueva S (2010)	20679485	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
448560	2540821	2540749	277339	277271	SPBC800.03	SPBC4B4.03	clr3	rsc1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Garcia JF (2010)	20675407	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
448561	2540574	2542007	277101	278490	SPBC409.03	SPAC20H4.07	swi5	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hyppa RW (2010)	20655467	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiotic recombination	double mutants show increased loss of double holiday junctures compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
448562	2540574	2539004	277101	275578	SPBC409.03	SPCC4G3.05c	swi5	mus81	-	slx3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hyppa RW (2010)	20655467	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiotic recombination	double mutants show increased loss of double holiday junctures compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
448563	2542007	2539004	278490	275578	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC4G3.05c	rad57	mus81	rhp57|SPAC145.01	slx3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hyppa RW (2010)	20655467	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiotic recombination	double mutants show increased loss of double holiday junctures compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
448564	2542106	2539004	278582	275578	SPAC8E11.03c	SPCC4G3.05c	dmc1	mus81	dmp1	slx3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hyppa RW (2010)	20655467	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiotic recombination	double mutants show increased loss of double holiday junctures compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
448565	2542510	2543529	278968	279947	SPAC1851.04c	SPAC4C5.02c	ric1	ryh1	SPAC27D7.01c|sat4|vas3	hos1|sat7	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ma Y (2010)	20623139	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
448566	2542510	2539996	278968	276540	SPAC1851.04c	SPBC119.07	ric1	ppk19	SPAC27D7.01c|sat4|vas3	vps15	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ma Y (2010)	20623139	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
448567	2543529	2539873	279947	276419	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC13G1.11	ryh1	ykt6	hos1|sat7	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ma Y (2010)	20623139	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
448568	2540720	2539781	277243	276331	SPBC216.07c	SPBC106.10	tor2	pka1	SPBC646.01c	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Valbuena N (2010)	20634885	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance|mating response	double mutants show a build up in DNA content	-	BIOGRID
448569	2540720	2543351	277243	279773	SPBC216.07c	SPAC8C9.03	tor2	cgs1	SPBC646.01c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Valbuena N (2010)	20634885	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:undetermined|mating response:undetermined	deletion of cgs1 blocks the build up of DNA seen in a tor2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
448570	2540810	2540720	277329	277243	SPBC19C7.03	SPBC216.07c	cyr1	tor2	git2	SPBC646.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Valbuena N (2010)	20634885	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating response:partial rescue	deletion of tor2 partially restores the mating response in cyr1 mutants	-	BIOGRID
448571	2539712	2542363	276265	278827	SPBC146.01	SPAC1783.05	med15	hrp1	SPBP35G2.15	chd1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Khorosjutina O (2010)	20622008	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448572	2542571	2539712	279027	276265	SPAC589.02c	SPBC146.01	med13	med15	spTrap240|srb9	SPBP35G2.15	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Khorosjutina O (2010)	20622008	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448573	2542571	2540678	279027	277203	SPAC589.02c	SPBC1A4.10c	med13	pmc1	spTrap240|srb9	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Khorosjutina O (2010)	20622008	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448574	2542571	2543467	279027	279887	SPAC589.02c	SPAC688.08	med13	srb8	spTrap240|srb9	med12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Khorosjutina O (2010)	20622008	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448575	2542571	2542363	279027	278827	SPAC589.02c	SPAC1783.05	med13	hrp1	spTrap240|srb9	chd1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Khorosjutina O (2010)	20622008	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448576	2542571	2539712	279027	276265	SPAC589.02c	SPBC146.01	med13	med15	spTrap240|srb9	SPBP35G2.15	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Khorosjutina O (2010)	20622008	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448577	2542571	2540294	279027	276825	SPAC589.02c	SPBC31F10.04c	med13	srb4	spTrap240|srb9	med17	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Khorosjutina O (2010)	20622008	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448578	2542571	2542141	279027	278617	SPAC589.02c	SPAC17C9.05c	med13	pmc3	spTrap240|srb9	med27|prk1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Khorosjutina O (2010)	20622008	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448579	2539773	2540294	276324	276825	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC31F10.04c	med7	srb4	-	med17	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Khorosjutina O (2010)	20622008	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448580	2539773	2542141	276324	278617	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC17C9.05c	med7	pmc3	-	med27|prk1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Khorosjutina O (2010)	20622008	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448581	2540481	2541268	277009	277782	SPBC2D10.12	SPBP19A11.03c	rhp23	mts4	-	rpn1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Li G (2010)	20614012	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448582	2541603	2541975	278100	278460	SPAC1F5.04c	SPAC20G8.05c	cdc12	cdc15	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448583	2541975	2541603	278460	278100	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC1F5.04c	cdc15	cdc12	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448584	2541975	2542740	278460	279190	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC9G1.06c	cdc15	cyk3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448585	2541975	2543129	278460	279561	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC4F8.13c	cdc15	rng2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448586	2541975	2542029	278460	278511	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC8E11.02c	cdc15	rad24	-	anr5|sam4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448587	2542740	2541975	279190	278460	SPAC9G1.06c	SPAC20G8.05c	cyk3	cdc15	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448588	2542740	2542247	279190	278717	SPAC9G1.06c	SPAC57A7.10c	cyk3	sec21	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448589	2542740	2542029	279190	278511	SPAC9G1.06c	SPAC8E11.02c	cyk3	rad24	-	anr5|sam4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448590	2542740	2542252	279190	278722	SPAC9G1.06c	SPAC17A2.13c	cyk3	rad25	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448591	2542740	2541450	279190	277955	SPAC9G1.06c	SPAC24C9.06c	cyk3	SPAC24C9.06c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448592	2542740	2542347	279190	278812	SPAC9G1.06c	SPAC1751.03	cyk3	SPAC1751.03	-	csn7|csn72|csn7b|SPAC31A2.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448593	2542740	5802955	279190	858093	SPAC9G1.06c	SPAC25G10.09c	cyk3	pan1	-	SPAC27F1.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448594	2542740	2543153	279190	279585	SPAC9G1.06c	SPAC821.05	cyk3	SPAC821.05	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448595	2542740	2542242	279190	278713	SPAC9G1.06c	SPAC18G6.04c	cyk3	shm2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448596	2542740	2541126	279190	277641	SPAC9G1.06c	SPBC651.01c	cyk3	nog1	-	SPBC725.18c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448597	2542740	2541255	279190	277769	SPAC9G1.06c	SPBC947.02	cyk3	apl2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448598	2542740	2539659	279190	276214	SPAC9G1.06c	SPBC146.13c	cyk3	myo1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448599	2542740	2542538	279190	278995	SPAC9G1.06c	SPAC1805.11c	cyk3	rps2602	-	rps26-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448600	2542740	2541211	279190	277725	SPAC9G1.06c	SPBC839.10	cyk3	usp107	-	snu71	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448601	2542740	2543229	279190	279657	SPAC9G1.06c	SPAC56F8.05c	cyk3	mug64	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448602	2542740	2538913	279190	275490	SPAC9G1.06c	SPCC31H12.08c	cyk3	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448603	2542740	2542463	279190	278924	SPAC9G1.06c	SPAC1834.03c	cyk3	hhf1	-	h4.1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448604	2542740	2540455	279190	276983	SPAC9G1.06c	SPBC215.05	cyk3	gpd1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448605	2542740	2542031	279190	278513	SPAC9G1.06c	SPAC23C11.09	cyk3	ala1	-	ars1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448606	2542740	2541136	279190	277651	SPAC9G1.06c	SPBC691.04	cyk3	SPBC691.04	-	pi031|SPACTOKYO_453.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448607	2542740	2541695	279190	278191	SPAC9G1.06c	SPAC1F7.05	cyk3	cdc22	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448608	2542740	2542019	279190	278502	SPAC9G1.06c	SPAC23A1.17	cyk3	SPAC23A1.17	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448609	2542740	2540046	279190	276584	SPAC9G1.06c	SPBC1773.10c	cyk3	nrs1	-	ded81	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448610	2542740	2542777	279190	279226	SPAC9G1.06c	SPAC6F6.03c	cyk3	SPAC6F6.03c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448611	2543129	2541699	279561	278195	SPAC4F8.13c	SPAP8A3.08	rng2	cdc4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448612	2543129	2541975	279561	278460	SPAC4F8.13c	SPAC20G8.05c	rng2	cdc15	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448613	2543129	2542029	279561	278511	SPAC4F8.13c	SPAC8E11.02c	rng2	rad24	-	anr5|sam4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448614	2543129	2542463	279561	278924	SPAC4F8.13c	SPAC1834.03c	rng2	hhf1	-	h4.1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448615	2543129	2543304	279561	279728	SPAC4F8.13c	SPAC6B12.12	rng2	tom70	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448616	2543129	2539081	279561	275653	SPAC4F8.13c	SPCC1259.09c	rng2	pdx1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448617	2543129	2541695	279561	278191	SPAC4F8.13c	SPAC1F7.05	rng2	cdc22	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448618	2543129	2541126	279561	277641	SPAC4F8.13c	SPBC651.01c	rng2	nog1	-	SPBC725.18c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448619	2543129	2540469	279561	276997	SPAC4F8.13c	SPBC26H8.08c	rng2	grn1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448620	2543129	2540046	279561	276584	SPAC4F8.13c	SPBC1773.10c	rng2	nrs1	-	ded81	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448621	2543129	2540439	279561	276967	SPAC4F8.13c	SPBC31F10.06c	rng2	sar1	-	psr1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448622	2543129	2543181	279561	279611	SPAC4F8.13c	SPAC3F10.03	rng2	grs1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448623	2543129	2542031	279561	278513	SPAC4F8.13c	SPAC23C11.09	rng2	ala1	-	ars1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448624	2543129	2539687	279561	276242	SPAC4F8.13c	SPBC1711.05	rng2	SPBC1711.05	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448625	2543129	2539048	279561	275621	SPAC4F8.13c	SPCC1223.08c	rng2	dfr1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448626	2543129	2543082	279561	279515	SPAC4F8.13c	SPAC3C7.08c	rng2	elf1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448627	2543129	2539862	279561	276409	SPAC4F8.13c	SPBC16C6.07c	rng2	rpt1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448628	2543129	2542538	279561	278995	SPAC4F8.13c	SPAC1805.11c	rng2	rps2602	-	rps26-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448629	2543129	2540324	279561	276854	SPAC4F8.13c	SPBC29A3.16	rng2	rrs1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448630	2543129	2540899	279561	277415	SPAC4F8.13c	SPBC4F6.18c	rng2	arf1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448631	2543129	2542347	279561	278812	SPAC4F8.13c	SPAC1751.03	rng2	SPAC1751.03	-	csn7|csn72|csn7b|SPAC31A2.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448632	2543129	2542777	279561	279226	SPAC4F8.13c	SPAC6F6.03c	rng2	SPAC6F6.03c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448633	2543129	2542235	279561	278707	SPAC4F8.13c	SPAC18G6.05c	rng2	SPAC18G6.05c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448634	2543129	2541136	279561	277651	SPAC4F8.13c	SPBC691.04	rng2	SPBC691.04	-	pi031|SPACTOKYO_453.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448635	2541975	2540112	278460	276649	SPAC20G8.05c	SPBC11C11.02	cdc15	imp2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
448636	2541975	2539513	278460	276075	SPAC20G8.05c	SPCC645.05c	cdc15	myo2	-	rng5	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
448637	2541975	2542805	278460	279253	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC15A10.08	cdc15	ain1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
448638	2541975	2541699	278460	278195	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAP8A3.08	cdc15	cdc4	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
448639	2541975	2543129	278460	279561	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC4F8.13c	cdc15	rng2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
448640	2541975	2541599	278460	278096	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC24B11.11c	cdc15	sid2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
448641	2541975	2541603	278460	278100	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC1F5.04c	cdc15	cdc12	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
448642	2541975	2539205	278460	275775	SPAC20G8.05c	SPCC4B3.15	cdc15	mid1	-	dmf1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
448643	2541975	2540650	278460	277175	SPAC20G8.05c	SPBC244.01c	cdc15	sid4	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
448644	2541975	2542358	278460	278823	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC1782.09c	cdc15	clp1	-	flp1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2010)	20603077	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
448645	2541089	2540144	277604	276681	SPBC646.09c	SPBC1778.08c	int6	arc3	yin6	arc21	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cabrera R (2010)	20668161	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
448646	2540939	2540144	277455	276681	SPBC4.07c	SPBC1778.08c	rpt2	arc3	mts2	arc21	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cabrera R (2010)	20668161	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
448647	2541268	2540144	277782	276681	SPBP19A11.03c	SPBC1778.08c	mts4	arc3	rpn1	arc21	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Cabrera R (2010)	20668161	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
448648	2542907	2541268	279351	277782	SPAC1420.03	SPBP19A11.03c	rpn501	mts4	rpn5|rpn5-a	rpn1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Cabrera R (2010)	20668161	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448649	2542907	2540144	279351	276681	SPAC1420.03	SPBC1778.08c	rpn501	arc3	rpn5|rpn5-a	arc21	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Cabrera R (2010)	20668161	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448650	2542907	2543233	279351	279661	SPAC1420.03	SPAC630.03	rpn501	arp3	rpn5|rpn5-a	act2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Cabrera R (2010)	20668161	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448651	2540144	2543233	276681	279661	SPBC1778.08c	SPAC630.03	arc3	arp3	arc21	act2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Cabrera R (2010)	20668161	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448652	2540144	2542907	276681	279351	SPBC1778.08c	SPAC1420.03	arc3	rpn501	arc21	rpn5|rpn5-a	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Cabrera R (2010)	20668161	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448653	2540144	2541268	276681	277782	SPBC1778.08c	SPBP19A11.03c	arc3	mts4	arc21	rpn1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Cabrera R (2010)	20668161	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448654	2540794	5802965	277313	858103	SPBC582.07c	SPAC11H11.06	rpn7	arp2	-	SPAC22F8.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Cabrera R (2010)	20668161	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
448655	2538736	2540144	275320	276681	SPCC1322.12c	SPBC1778.08c	bub1	arc3	-	arc21	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Cabrera R (2010)	20668161	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chronological lifespan	-	-	BIOGRID
448684	2539499	2540992	276062	277508	SPCC622.08c	SPBC342.05	hta1	crb2	-	rhp9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sanders SL (2010)	20679488	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448685	2542226	2540992	278699	277508	SPAC19G12.06c	SPBC342.05	hta2	crb2	-	rhp9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sanders SL (2010)	20679488	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
448686	2539123	2540992	275695	277508	SPCC18B5.03	SPBC342.05	wee1	crb2	-	rhp9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanders SL (2010)	20679488	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
448687	2540719	2543289	277242	279714	SPBC216.05	SPAC9E9.08	rad3	rad26	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Khair L (2010)	20505337	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	Deletion of rad26 increases UV sensitivity in cells containing rad3 fused to a DNA binding domain	-	BIOGRID
448688	2540719	2543289	277242	279714	SPBC216.05	SPAC9E9.08	rad3	rad26	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Khair L (2010)	20505337	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	genetic complex|rad3/rad26/tel1 triple mutants lose their telomeres and show chromosome circularization	-	BIOGRID
448689	2540719	2539209	277242	275779	SPBC216.05	SPCC23B6.03c	rad3	tel1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Khair L (2010)	20505337	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	genetic complex|rad3/rad17/tel1/ctf18 quadruple mutants lose their telomeres and circularize DNA|rad3/rad26/rad1 triple mutants lose their telomeres and circularize DNA|rad3/rad26/tel1 triple mutants lose their telomeres and show chromosome circularization|rad3/rad26/trt1 triple mutants lose their telomeres	-	BIOGRID
448690	2543289	2539209	279714	275779	SPAC9E9.08	SPCC23B6.03c	rad26	tel1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Khair L (2010)	20505337	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	genetic complex|rad3/rad26/tel1 triple mutants lose their telomeres and show chromosome circularization	-	BIOGRID
448691	2540719	2540601	277242	277127	SPBC216.05	SPBC29A3.14c	rad3	trt1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Khair L (2010)	20505337	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	genetic complex|rad3/rad26/trt1 triple mutants lose their telomeres	-	BIOGRID
448692	2540601	2539209	277127	275779	SPBC29A3.14c	SPCC23B6.03c	trt1	tel1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Khair L (2010)	20505337	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	genetic complex|rad3/rad26/trt1 triple mutants lose their telomeres	-	BIOGRID
448693	2540719	2542558	277242	279014	SPBC216.05	SPAC1952.07	rad3	rad1	-	rad19	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Khair L (2010)	20505337	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	genetic complex|rad3/rad26/rad1 triple mutants lose their telomeres and circularize DNA	-	BIOGRID
448694	2542558	2539209	279014	275779	SPAC1952.07	SPCC23B6.03c	rad1	tel1	rad19	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Khair L (2010)	20505337	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	genetic complex|rad3/rad26/rad1 triple mutants lose their telomeres and circularize DNA	-	BIOGRID
448695	2540719	2541643	277242	278139	SPBC216.05	SPAC14C4.13	rad3	rad17	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Khair L (2010)	20505337	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	genetic complex|rad3/rad17/tel1/ctf18 quadruple mutants lose their telomeres and circularize DNA	-	BIOGRID
448696	2540719	2541270	277242	277784	SPBC216.05	SPBC902.02c	rad3	ctf18	-	chl12	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Khair L (2010)	20505337	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	genetic complex|rad3/rad17/tel1/ctf18 quadruple mutants lose their telomeres and circularize DNA	-	BIOGRID
448697	2541643	2539209	278139	275779	SPAC14C4.13	SPCC23B6.03c	rad17	tel1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Khair L (2010)	20505337	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	genetic complex|rad3/rad17/tel1/ctf18 quadruple mutants lose their telomeres and circularize DNA	-	BIOGRID
448698	2541643	2541270	278139	277784	SPAC14C4.13	SPBC902.02c	rad17	ctf18	-	chl12	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Khair L (2010)	20505337	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	genetic complex|rad3/rad17/tel1/ctf18 quadruple mutants lose their telomeres and circularize DNA	-	BIOGRID
448699	2539209	2541270	275779	277784	SPCC23B6.03c	SPBC902.02c	tel1	ctf18	-	chl12	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Khair L (2010)	20505337	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	genetic complex|rad3/rad17/tel1/ctf18 quadruple mutants lose their telomeres and circularize DNA	-	BIOGRID
448700	2541270	2541643	277784	278139	SPBC902.02c	SPAC14C4.13	ctf18	rad17	chl12	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Khair L (2010)	20505337	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution|telomere length	deletion of rad17 causes aberrant binding of rad1 to DNA	-	BIOGRID
448953	2541770	2539741	278264	276293	SPAP27G11.10c	SPBC16A3.05c	nup184	rae1	-	cut21	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Whalen WA (1999)	10388805	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
448954	2543390	2543526	279812	279944	SPAC631.01c	SPAC4A8.15c	acp2	cdc3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nakano K (2006)	16866873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology	-	-	BIOGRID
448955	2543390	2541738	279812	278232	SPAC631.01c	SPAC20G4.06c	acp2	adf1	-	cof1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nakano K (2006)	16866873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology	-	-	BIOGRID
448956	2543390	2541699	279812	278195	SPAC631.01c	SPAP8A3.08	acp2	cdc4	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nakano K (2006)	16866873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology	-	-	BIOGRID
448957	2542679	2541738	279132	278232	SPAC12B10.07	SPAC20G4.06c	acp1	adf1	-	cof1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Nakano K (2006)	16866873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
448958	2542679	2543526	279132	279944	SPAC12B10.07	SPAC4A8.15c	acp1	cdc3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Nakano K (2006)	16866873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
448959	2542679	2541699	279132	278195	SPAC12B10.07	SPAP8A3.08	acp1	cdc4	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Nakano K (2006)	16866873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
448960	2542679	2542805	279132	279253	SPAC12B10.07	SPAC15A10.08	acp1	ain1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakano K (2006)	16866873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
448961	2542679	2539765	279132	276316	SPAC12B10.07	SPBC1778.06c	acp1	fim1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakano K (2006)	16866873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
448962	2542679	2543129	279132	279561	SPAC12B10.07	SPAC4F8.13c	acp1	rng2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakano K (2006)	16866873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
448963	2543390	2542805	279812	279253	SPAC631.01c	SPAC15A10.08	acp2	ain1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakano K (2006)	16866873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
448964	2543390	2539765	279812	276316	SPAC631.01c	SPBC1778.06c	acp2	fim1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakano K (2006)	16866873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
448965	2543390	2543129	279812	279561	SPAC631.01c	SPAC4F8.13c	acp2	rng2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakano K (2006)	16866873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
449008	2540473	2542404	277001	278868	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC57A7.11	tor1	mip1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hartmuth S (2009)	19417002	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
449009	2540720	2542404	277243	278868	SPBC216.07c	SPAC57A7.11	tor2	mip1	SPBC646.01c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Matsuo T (2007)	17261596	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
449010	2540720	2542972	277243	279411	SPBC216.07c	SPAPYUG7.02c	tor2	sin1	SPBC646.01c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Matsuo T (2007)	17261596	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
449011	2540720	2539845	277243	276393	SPBC216.07c	SPBC12C2.02c	tor2	ste20	SPBC646.01c	ste16	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Matsuo T (2007)	17261596	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
449012	2540720	2540645	277243	277170	SPBC216.07c	SPBC21B10.05c	tor2	pop3	SPBC646.01c	wat1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Matsuo T (2007)	17261596	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
449013	2540473	2542404	277001	278868	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC57A7.11	tor1	mip1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Matsuo T (2007)	17261596	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
449014	2540473	2542972	277001	279411	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAPYUG7.02c	tor1	sin1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Matsuo T (2007)	17261596	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
449015	2540473	2539845	277001	276393	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC12C2.02c	tor1	ste20	-	ste16	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Matsuo T (2007)	17261596	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
449016	2540473	2540645	277001	277170	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC21B10.05c	tor1	pop3	-	wat1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Matsuo T (2007)	17261596	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
449018	2540720	2539206	277243	275776	SPBC216.07c	SPCC24B10.07	tor2	gad8	SPBC646.01c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Matsuo T (2007)	17261596	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:partial rescue|heat sensitivity:partial rescue|osmotic stress resistance:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	tor2 and ste20 mutant sensitivity to high temperature, osmotic pressure and elongated morphology can be partially suppressed by expression of an activated form of gad8	-	BIOGRID
449019	2539845	2539206	276393	275776	SPBC12C2.02c	SPCC24B10.07	ste20	gad8	ste16	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Matsuo T (2007)	17261596	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:partial rescue|heat sensitivity:partial rescue|osmotic stress resistance:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	tor2 and ste20 mutant sensitivity to high temperature, osmotic pressure and elongated morphology can be partially suppressed by expression of an activated form of gad8	-	BIOGRID
449020	2543339	2540720	279762	277243	SPAC630.13c	SPBC216.07c	tsc2	tor2	-	SPBC646.01c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Matsuo T (2007)	17261596	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	poor growth of the tsc2delat ade6 mutant on medium containing a low concentration of adenine could be suppressed by either tor2-ts6 or tor2-ts10	-	BIOGRID
449025	2540473	2539869	277001	276415	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC11B10.09	tor1	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Schonbrun M (2009)	19546237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:wild type	expressing an unphosphorylatable and constitutively active form of Cdc2 completely reversed the elongated morphology of tor1 mutants	-	BIOGRID
449026	2540473	2542632	277001	279086	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC24H6.05	tor1	cdc25	-	sal2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Schonbrun M (2009)	19546237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	Triple mutant: tor1/wee1/cdc25 is lethal	-	BIOGRID
449029	2540473	2539123	277001	275695	SPBC30D10.10c	SPCC18B5.03	tor1	wee1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Schonbrun M (2009)	19546237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	Triple mutant: tor1/wee1/cdc25 is lethal	-	BIOGRID
449032	2540499	2542734	277027	279184	SPBC25D12.02c	SPAC29A4.10	dnt1	rrn5	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Jin QW (2007)	17538026	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
449033	2540499	2540873	277027	277390	SPBC25D12.02c	SPBC4C3.05c	dnt1	nuc1	-	rpa1|rpa190	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Jin QW (2007)	17538026	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
449034	2540873	2542734	277390	279184	SPBC4C3.05c	SPAC29A4.10	nuc1	rrn5	rpa1|rpa190	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Jin QW (2007)	17538026	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
449035	2542746	2540499	279196	277027	SPAC9G1.09	SPBC25D12.02c	sid1	dnt1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2007)	17538026	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
449036	2541599	2540499	278096	277027	SPAC24B11.11c	SPBC25D12.02c	sid2	dnt1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2007)	17538026	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
449039	2542358	2540499	278823	277027	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC25D12.02c	clp1	dnt1	flp1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Jin QW (2007)	17538026	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
449040	2542358	2542632	278823	279086	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC24H6.05	clp1	cdc25	flp1	sal2	Two-hybrid	physical	Jin QW (2007)	17538026	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
449136	2538731	2542949	275315	279389	SPCC1393.10	SPAC1142.05	ctr4	ctr5	-	-	PCA	physical	Ioannoni R (2010)	20694150	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	interaction detected with a BiFC protein compliment system	-	BIOGRID
449137	2538731	2538731	275315	275315	SPCC1393.10	SPCC1393.10	ctr4	ctr4	-	-	PCA	physical	Ioannoni R (2010)	20694150	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	interaction detected with a BiFC protein compliment system only in the presence of CTR5	-	BIOGRID
449217	2539765	2541940	276316	278427	SPBC1778.06c	SPAC27F1.02c	fim1	cdc8	-	fus4	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Clayton JE (2010)	20705471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:wild type	mutation of CDC8 offsets the extended Myo1 patch lifetime seen in fim1 mutants	-	BIOGRID
449565	2539765	2540051	276316	276589	SPBC1778.06c	SPBC32H8.12c	fim1	act1	-	cps8|pi012	Co-fractionation	physical	Skau CT (2010)	20705466	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
449566	2541940	2540051	278427	276589	SPAC27F1.02c	SPBC32H8.12c	cdc8	act1	fus4	cps8|pi012	Co-fractionation	physical	Skau CT (2010)	20705466	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
449567	2539765	2541940	276316	278427	SPBC1778.06c	SPAC27F1.02c	fim1	cdc8	-	fus4	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Skau CT (2010)	20705466	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution:wild type	depletion of cdc8 restores actin patch formation in a fim1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
449568	2541940	2539765	278427	276316	SPAC27F1.02c	SPBC1778.06c	cdc8	fim1	fus4	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Skau CT (2010)	20705466	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	bud neck morphology:partial rescue|cell size:partial rescue|nuclear morphology:partial rescue	deletion of fim1 partially restores septa formation and nucleus formation in a cdc8 mutant	-	BIOGRID
449569	2539765	2541738	276316	278232	SPBC1778.06c	SPAC20G4.06c	fim1	adf1	-	cof1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Skau CT (2010)	20705466	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	double mutants show increased actin patch lifetime	-	BIOGRID
449570	2540735	2539050	277258	275623	SPBC83.03c	SPCC11E10.08	tas3	rik1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gerace EL (2010)	20705239	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
449571	2542198	2539050	278673	275623	SPAC6F12.09	SPCC11E10.08	rdp1	rik1	rdr1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gerace EL (2010)	20705239	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
449572	2539050	2539403	275623	275968	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC736.11	rik1	ago1	-	csp9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gerace EL (2010)	20705239	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
449573	2540735	2540825	277258	277343	SPBC83.03c	SPBC428.08c	tas3	clr4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gerace EL (2010)	20705239	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
449574	2542467	2539050	278928	275623	SPAC1834.04	SPCC11E10.08	hht1	rik1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gerace EL (2010)	20705239	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
449575	2541220	2539050	277734	275623	SPBC8D2.04	SPCC11E10.08	hht2	rik1	h3.2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gerace EL (2010)	20705239	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
449576	2539050	2538930	275623	275506	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC188.13c	rik1	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gerace EL (2010)	20705239	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
449577	2539050	2539403	275623	275968	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC736.11	rik1	ago1	-	csp9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gerace EL (2010)	20705239	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
449578	2539050	2542239	275623	278711	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC18G6.02c	rik1	chp1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gerace EL (2010)	20705239	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
449579	2539050	2540735	275623	277258	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC83.03c	rik1	tas3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gerace EL (2010)	20705239	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
449580	2539050	2539248	275623	275818	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC1739.03	rik1	hrr1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gerace EL (2010)	20705239	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
449581	2539050	2539423	275623	275988	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC663.12	rik1	cid12	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gerace EL (2010)	20705239	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
449582	2539050	2542198	275623	278673	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC6F12.09	rik1	rdp1	-	rdr1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gerace EL (2010)	20705239	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
449583	2539050	2538930	275623	275506	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC188.13c	rik1	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Gerace EL (2010)	20705239	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
449584	2539050	2539403	275623	275968	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC736.11	rik1	ago1	-	csp9	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Gerace EL (2010)	20705239	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
449585	2539050	2540825	275623	277343	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC428.08c	rik1	clr4	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Gerace EL (2010)	20705239	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
449586	2543580	2541620	279995	278117	SPAC644.14c	SPAC2G11.12	rad51	rqh1	rhp51	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Lambert S (2010)	20705238	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
449587	2543086	2541620	279519	278117	SPAC30D11.10	SPAC2G11.12	rad52	rqh1	rad22|rad22A	hus2|rad12|rec9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lambert S (2010)	20705238	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	-	-	BIOGRID
449607	2539087	2541849	275659	278340	SPCC1259.13	SPAC20G8.01	chk1	cdc17	rad27	SPAC57A10.13c	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Ahmed S (2004)	15082762	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
449626	2540398	2540589	276926	277115	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC20F10.06	dis3	mad2	rrp44	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Murakami H (2007)	17380189	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
449863	3361562	2541155	280638	277670	SPAC11E3.03	SPBC6B1.04	csm1	mde4	pcs1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Corbett KD (2010)	20723757	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
449864	3361562	3361562	280638	280638	SPAC11E3.03	SPAC11E3.03	csm1	csm1	pcs1	pcs1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Corbett KD (2010)	20723757	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
449973	2542657	2541628	279111	278124	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC110.02	mis4	pds5	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tanaka K (2001)	11598020	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
449978	856083	2542729	36153	279179	YPL024W	SPAC26A3.03c	RMI1	rmi1	NCE4|L000004399	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Chang M (2005)	15889139	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
450006	2539352	2539817	275918	276367	SPCC188.07	SPBC146.03c	ccq1	cut3	-	smc4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Motwani T (2010)	20709788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
450007	2539352	2541319	275918	277831	SPCC188.07	SPBP4H10.06c	ccq1	cut14	-	smc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Motwani T (2010)	20709788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
450008	2542313	2539352	278779	275918	SPAC16A10.07c	SPCC188.07	taz1	ccq1	myb|myb1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Motwani T (2010)	20709788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:undetermined	overexpression of CCQ1 rescues telomere abnormalities seen in a TAZ1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
450009	2539352	2539817	275918	276367	SPCC188.07	SPBC146.03c	ccq1	cut3	-	smc4	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Motwani T (2010)	20709788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:undetermined	cut3 and cut14 overexpression alleviate the chromosome bridging that occurs when ccq1 is downregulated	-	BIOGRID
450010	2539352	2541319	275918	277831	SPCC188.07	SPBP4H10.06c	ccq1	cut14	-	smc2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Motwani T (2010)	20709788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:undetermined	cut3 and cut14 overexpression alleviate the chromosome bridging that occurs when ccq1 is downregulated	-	BIOGRID
450011	2539864	2539864	276411	276411	SPBC16A3.15c	SPBC16A3.15c	nda2	nda2	-	-	Co-fractionation	physical	Al-Bassam J (2010)	20708587	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
450012	2543399	2539864	279821	276411	SPAC3G9.12	SPBC16A3.15c	peg1	nda2	cls1	-	Co-fractionation	physical	Al-Bassam J (2010)	20708587	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
450013	2541620	2540574	278117	277101	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC409.03	rqh1	swi5	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Hope JC (2005)	15802523	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
452496	2538959	2539087	275533	275659	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC1259.13	cds1	chk1	-	rad27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nilssen EA (2004)	15498101	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression	-	-	BIOGRID
452577	2542193	2541699	278668	278195	SPAC9G1.11c	SPAP8A3.08	spn4	cdc4	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wu JQ (2010)	20739711	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
452578	2542193	2540742	278668	277265	SPAC9G1.11c	SPBC19G7.08c	spn4	art1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wu JQ (2010)	20739711	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Deletion of SPBC19G7.08c causes a growth defect in an SPN1/SPN4 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
452579	2543516	2540742	279934	277265	SPAC4F10.11	SPBC19G7.08c	spn1	art1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wu JQ (2010)	20739711	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Deletion of SPBC19G7.08c causes a growth defect in an SPN1/SPN4 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
452580	2542193	2539437	278668	276000	SPAC9G1.11c	SPCC645.06c	spn4	rgf3	-	lad1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wu JQ (2010)	20739711	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Deletion of rgf3 causes a growth defect in an spn1/spn4 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
452581	2543516	2539437	279934	276000	SPAC4F10.11	SPCC645.06c	spn1	rgf3	-	lad1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wu JQ (2010)	20739711	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Deletion of rgf3 causes a growth defect in an spn1/spn4 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
452582	2541699	2543576	278195	279991	SPAP8A3.08	SPAC4A8.05c	cdc4	myp2	-	myo3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Wu JQ (2010)	20739711	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
452583	2540742	2543516	277265	279934	SPBC19G7.08c	SPAC4F10.11	art1	spn1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Wu JQ (2010)	20739711	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell death|inviable	double mutants show aberrant cell lysis	-	BIOGRID
452584	2539358	2543516	275924	279934	SPCC16C4.07	SPAC4F10.11	scw1	spn1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Wu JQ (2010)	20739711	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis	double mutants show a cell separation defect	-	BIOGRID
452585	2541699	2543516	278195	279934	SPAP8A3.08	SPAC4F10.11	cdc4	spn1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Wu JQ (2010)	20739711	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
452586	2539358	2542683	275924	279136	SPCC16C4.07	SPAPYUG7.03c	scw1	mid2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Wu JQ (2010)	20739711	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis	double mutants show a cell separation defect	-	BIOGRID
452587	2539358	2539513	275924	276075	SPCC16C4.07	SPCC645.05c	scw1	myo2	-	rng5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wu JQ (2010)	20739711	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	data not shown	-	BIOGRID
452588	2539358	2541699	275924	278195	SPCC16C4.07	SPAP8A3.08	scw1	cdc4	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wu JQ (2010)	20739711	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	data not shown	-	BIOGRID
452589	2540742	2540969	277265	277485	SPBC19G7.08c	SPBC30B4.01c	art1	wsc1	-	SPBC3D6.14c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wu JQ (2010)	20739711	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
452590	2540742	2542953	277265	279393	SPBC19G7.08c	SPAC1006.06	art1	rgf2	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wu JQ (2010)	20739711	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
452591	2540742	2539580	277265	276139	SPBC19G7.08c	SPCC645.07	art1	rgf1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wu JQ (2010)	20739711	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
452592	2540742	2539437	277265	276000	SPBC19G7.08c	SPCC645.06c	art1	rgf3	-	lad1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wu JQ (2010)	20739711	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
452593	2540742	2541612	277265	278109	SPBC19G7.08c	SPAC1F7.04	art1	rho1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wu JQ (2010)	20739711	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
452594	2540742	2539992	277265	276536	SPBC19G7.08c	SPBC1289.04c	art1	pob1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wu JQ (2010)	20739711	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
452595	2540742	2539649	277265	276204	SPBC19G7.08c	SPBC12D12.04c	art1	pck2	-	pkc1|sts6	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wu JQ (2010)	20739711	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
452596	2539437	2540969	276000	277485	SPCC645.06c	SPBC30B4.01c	rgf3	wsc1	lad1	SPBC3D6.14c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wu JQ (2010)	20739711	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
452597	2539437	2539580	276000	276139	SPCC645.06c	SPCC645.07	rgf3	rgf1	lad1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wu JQ (2010)	20739711	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
452598	2539437	2541612	276000	278109	SPCC645.06c	SPAC1F7.04	rgf3	rho1	lad1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wu JQ (2010)	20739711	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
452599	2542873	2542988	279318	279426	SPAC9G1.02	SPAC1006.09	wis4	win1	wak1|wik1	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Zhou X (2010)	20729203	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein activity	double mutants show decreased activation of the MAPK pathway in response to appropriate stimuli|genetic complex|wis4/win1/byr2/mkh1 quadruple mutants show highly impaired activation of the MAPK pathway compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
452600	2542873	2540612	279318	277138	SPAC9G1.02	SPBC1D7.05	wis4	byr2	wak1|wik1	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Zhou X (2010)	20729203	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein activity	genetic complex|wis4/win1/byr2/mkh1 quadruple mutants show highly impaired activation of the MAPK pathway compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
452601	2542873	2542175	279318	278650	SPAC9G1.02	SPAC1F3.02c	wis4	mkh1	wak1|wik1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Zhou X (2010)	20729203	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein activity	genetic complex|wis4/win1/byr2/mkh1 quadruple mutants show highly impaired activation of the MAPK pathway compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
452602	2542988	2540612	279426	277138	SPAC1006.09	SPBC1D7.05	win1	byr2	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Zhou X (2010)	20729203	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein activity	genetic complex|wis4/win1/byr2/mkh1 quadruple mutants show highly impaired activation of the MAPK pathway compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
452603	2542988	2542175	279426	278650	SPAC1006.09	SPAC1F3.02c	win1	mkh1	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Zhou X (2010)	20729203	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein activity	genetic complex|wis4/win1/byr2/mkh1 quadruple mutants show highly impaired activation of the MAPK pathway compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
452604	2540612	2542175	277138	278650	SPBC1D7.05	SPAC1F3.02c	byr2	mkh1	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Zhou X (2010)	20729203	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein activity	genetic complex|wis4/win1/byr2/mkh1 quadruple mutants show highly impaired activation of the MAPK pathway compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
452605	2540013	2540847	276557	277364	SPBC14C8.07c	SPBC428.18	cdc18	cdt1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kiang L (2010)	20736315	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	double mutants show an increase in aberrant replication firing compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
452606	2538875	2542788	275454	279237	SPCC962.02c	SPAC15A10.15	bir1	sgo2	SPCP31B10.10c|cut17|pbh1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tsukahara T (2010)	20739936	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
452607	2539379	2541326	275945	277838	SPCC188.02	SPBP35G2.03c	par1	sgo1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tsukahara T (2010)	20739936	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
452608	2542788	2538875	279237	275454	SPAC15A10.15	SPCC962.02c	sgo2	bir1	-	SPCP31B10.10c|cut17|pbh1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tsukahara T (2010)	20739936	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
452611	2540880	2538875	277397	275454	SPBC582.03	SPCC962.02c	cdc13	bir1	-	SPCP31B10.10c|cut17|pbh1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tsukahara T (2010)	20739936	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:partial rescue	deletion of bir1 partially rescues chromosome segregation defects seen in a cdc13 mutant	-	BIOGRID
452612	2543682	2542428	280096	278890	SPAC637.10c	SPAC1805.12c	rpn10	uep1	pus1	ubi2	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Riedinger C (2010)	20739285	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
452613	2543682	2540025	280096	276569	SPAC637.10c	SPBC16G5.01	rpn10	rpn12	pus1	SPBC342.07|mts3	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Riedinger C (2010)	20739285	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
463098	2543526	2542162	279944	278638	SPAC4A8.15c	SPAC6F6.08c	cdc3	cdc16	-	bub2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ray S (2010)	20805322	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size|nuclear morphology	activation of SIN blocks cell elongation and mitotic enry	-	BIOGRID
463099	2541975	2542162	278460	278638	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC6F6.08c	cdc15	cdc16	-	bub2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ray S (2010)	20805322	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size|nuclear morphology	activation of SIN blocks cell elongation and mitotic entry	-	BIOGRID
463100	2543526	2539123	279944	275695	SPAC4A8.15c	SPCC18B5.03	cdc3	wee1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ray S (2010)	20805322	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:partial rescue|nuclear morphology:partial rescue	deletion of wee1 blocks the inhibition of cell elongation and mitotic entry seen in a cdc3/cdc16 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
463101	2542162	2539123	278638	275695	SPAC6F6.08c	SPCC18B5.03	cdc16	wee1	bub2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ray S (2010)	20805322	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:partial rescue|nuclear morphology:partial rescue	deletion of wee1 blocks the inhibition of cell elongation and mitotic entry seen in a cdc3/cdc16 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
463102	2543526	2541599	279944	278096	SPAC4A8.15c	SPAC24B11.11c	cdc3	sid2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ray S (2010)	20805322	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:partial rescue|nuclear morphology:partial rescue	deletion of sid2 blocks the inhibition of cell elongation and mitotic entry seen in a cdc3/cdc16 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
463103	2542162	2541599	278638	278096	SPAC6F6.08c	SPAC24B11.11c	cdc16	sid2	bub2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ray S (2010)	20805322	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:partial rescue|nuclear morphology:partial rescue	deletion of sid2 blocks the inhibition of cell elongation and mitotic entry seen in a cdc3/cdc16 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
463104	2541599	2543441	278096	279861	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC821.12	sid2	orb6	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ray S (2010)	20805322	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:partial rescue|nuclear morphology:partial rescue	deletion of orb6 blocks the effects of sid2 mutation in a cdc3/cdc16 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
463105	2540650	2543441	277175	279861	SPBC244.01c	SPAC821.12	sid4	orb6	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ray S (2010)	20805322	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
463106	2540660	2543441	277185	279861	SPBC21.06c	SPAC821.12	cdc7	orb6	its10|pld1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ray S (2010)	20805322	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
463107	2540624	2543441	277150	279861	SPBC24C6.07	SPAC821.12	cdc14	orb6	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ray S (2010)	20805322	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
463108	2540845	2543441	277362	279861	SPBC428.13c	SPAC821.12	mob1	orb6	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ray S (2010)	20805322	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
463109	2541599	2543441	278096	279861	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC821.12	sid2	orb6	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ray S (2010)	20805322	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
463266	2539963	2541473	276507	277975	SPBC17F3.02	SPAC2C4.14c	nak1	ppk11	mor4|orb3	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Goshima T (2010)	20826805	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|septum formation	-	-	BIOGRID
463267	2543441	2541473	279861	277975	SPAC821.12	SPAC2C4.14c	orb6	ppk11	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Goshima T (2010)	20826805	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|septum formation	-	-	BIOGRID
463268	2541317	2541473	277829	277975	SPBP19A11.04c	SPAC2C4.14c	mor2	ppk11	cps12	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Goshima T (2010)	20826805	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|septum formation	-	-	BIOGRID
463269	2542388	2541473	278852	277975	SPAC1834.06c	SPAC2C4.14c	pmo25	ppk11	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Goshima T (2010)	20826805	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	-	-	BIOGRID
463270	2541473	2542388	277975	278852	SPAC2C4.14c	SPAC1834.06c	ppk11	pmo25	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Goshima T (2010)	20826805	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
463271	2541473	2542388	277975	278852	SPAC2C4.14c	SPAC1834.06c	ppk11	pmo25	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Goshima T (2010)	20826805	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
463272	2542388	2541473	278852	277975	SPAC1834.06c	SPAC2C4.14c	pmo25	ppk11	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Goshima T (2010)	20826805	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
463273	2540574	2540584	277101	277110	SPBC409.03	SPBC28F2.07	swi5	sfr1	-	dds20|mug13	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kuwabara N (2010)	20823543	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
463274	2542727	2541746	279177	278240	SPAC26A3.02	SPAC20G4.04c	myh1	hus1	myh	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Luncsford PJ (2010)	20816984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
463275	2541746	2542727	278240	279177	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC26A3.02	hus1	myh1	-	myh	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Luncsford PJ (2010)	20816984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
463276	2542558	2542727	279014	279177	SPAC1952.07	SPAC26A3.02	rad1	myh1	rad19	myh	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Luncsford PJ (2010)	20816984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
463277	2540043	2542409	276581	278873	SPBC1198.12	SPAC17G8.10c	mfr1	dma1	SPBC660.02|fzr1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Krapp A (2010)	20826461	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation	-	-	BIOGRID
464202	2543001	2541519	279439	278020	SPAC1006.08	SPAC227.07c	etd1	pab1	-	ret1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Lahoz A (2010)	20876564	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
464203	2543001	2541519	279439	278020	SPAC1006.08	SPAC227.07c	etd1	pab1	-	ret1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Lahoz A (2010)	20876564	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
464204	2542162	2541519	278638	278020	SPAC6F6.08c	SPAC227.07c	cdc16	pab1	bub2	ret1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Lahoz A (2010)	20876564	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
464205	2540845	2541519	277362	278020	SPBC428.13c	SPAC227.07c	mob1	pab1	-	ret1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Lahoz A (2010)	20876564	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
464206	2542746	2541519	279196	278020	SPAC9G1.09	SPAC227.07c	sid1	pab1	-	ret1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Lahoz A (2010)	20876564	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
464207	2539149	2541519	275721	278020	SPCC1739.11c	SPAC227.07c	cdc11	pab1	-	ret1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Lahoz A (2010)	20876564	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
464208	2539149	2541519	275721	278020	SPCC1739.11c	SPAC227.07c	cdc11	pab1	-	ret1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Lahoz A (2010)	20876564	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
464209	2541519	2540845	278020	277362	SPAC227.07c	SPBC428.13c	pab1	mob1	ret1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lahoz A (2010)	20876564	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
464210	2540845	2541519	277362	278020	SPBC428.13c	SPAC227.07c	mob1	pab1	-	ret1	Two-hybrid	physical	Lahoz A (2010)	20876564	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
464211	2542746	2541519	279196	278020	SPAC9G1.09	SPAC227.07c	sid1	pab1	-	ret1	Two-hybrid	physical	Lahoz A (2010)	20876564	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
464212	2541599	2541519	278096	278020	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC227.07c	sid2	pab1	-	ret1	Two-hybrid	physical	Lahoz A (2010)	20876564	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
464213	2541519	2539123	278020	275695	SPAC227.07c	SPCC18B5.03	pab1	wee1	ret1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Lahoz A (2010)	20876564	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
464214	2541519	2539869	278020	276415	SPAC227.07c	SPBC11B10.09	pab1	cdc2	ret1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Lahoz A (2010)	20876564	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
465225	2539371	2540430	275937	276958	SPCC18B5.06	SPBC25B2.01	dom34	SPBC25B2.01	SPCC18B5.06|erf1|sup45	SPBC2G5.08	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Chen L (2010)	20890290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
465226	2539371	2540430	275937	276958	SPCC18B5.06	SPBC25B2.01	dom34	SPBC25B2.01	SPCC18B5.06|erf1|sup45	SPBC2G5.08	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chen L (2010)	20890290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
467764	3361323	2540728	280399	277251	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC216.06c	swi3	swi1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Rapp JB (2010)	20967229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
467765	3361323	2543289	280399	279714	SPBC30D10.04	SPAC9E9.08	swi3	rad26	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Rapp JB (2010)	20967229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Camptothecin (CPT) (CHEBI:27656 and PubChem CID: 24360)	-	BIOGRID
467766	2540728	2543289	277251	279714	SPBC216.06c	SPAC9E9.08	swi1	rad26	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Rapp JB (2010)	20967229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Camptothecin (CPT) (CHEBI:27656 and PubChem CID: 24360)	-	BIOGRID
467767	3361323	2541270	280399	277784	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC902.02c	swi3	ctf18	-	chl12	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Rapp JB (2010)	20967229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Camptothecin (CPT) (CHEBI:27656 and PubChem CID: 24360)|Thiabendazole (TBZ)(CHEBI:45979 and PubChem CID: 5430)	-	BIOGRID
467768	2540045	2541185	276583	277699	SPBC119.13c	SPBC6B1.07	prp31	prp1	-	zer1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Luetzelberger M (2010)	20007600	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
467769	2540045	2541172	276583	277686	SPBC119.13c	SPBC776.01	prp31	rpl29	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Luetzelberger M (2010)	20007600	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
467770	2540045	2539969	276583	276513	SPBC119.13c	SPBC1685.10	prp31	rps27	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Luetzelberger M (2010)	20007600	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
467771	2539312	2541185	275879	277699	SPCC777.14	SPBC6B1.07	prp4	prp1	-	zer1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Luetzelberger M (2010)	20007600	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
478018	2543147	2542768	279579	279218	SPAC1006.05c	SPAC7D4.06c	och1	alg3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ohashi T (2010)	20854854	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|chemical compound accumulation|vegetative growth	och1/alg2 double mutants show increased numbers of small N-linked oligosaccharides compared to och1 single mutants	-	BIOGRID
478019	2540719	2538775	277242	275357	SPBC216.05	SPCC23B6.05c	rad3	ssb3	-	rpa3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Cavero S (2010)	20885790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
478020	2538959	2538775	275533	275357	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC23B6.05c	cds1	ssb3	-	rpa3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Cavero S (2010)	20885790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to UV and HU	-	BIOGRID
478022	2539087	2538775	275659	275357	SPCC1259.13	SPCC23B6.05c	chk1	ssb3	rad27	rpa3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Cavero S (2010)	20885790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionizing radiation resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to ionizing radiation, MMS, HU and CPT	-	BIOGRID
478023	2541158	2538775	277673	275357	SPBC660.13c	SPCC23B6.05c	ssb1	ssb3	rad11|rpa1	rpa3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Cavero S (2010)	20885790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
478024	2538775	2540728	275357	277251	SPCC23B6.05c	SPBC216.06c	ssb3	swi1	rpa3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Cavero S (2010)	20885790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to CPT, MMS, HU and UV radiation	-	BIOGRID
478025	2538775	3361323	275357	280399	SPCC23B6.05c	SPBC30D10.04	ssb3	swi3	rpa3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Cavero S (2010)	20885790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to CPT, MMS, HU and UV radiation	-	BIOGRID
478026	2538775	2541270	275357	277784	SPCC23B6.05c	SPBC902.02c	ssb3	ctf18	rpa3	chl12	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Cavero S (2010)	20885790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to CPT, MMS, HU and UV radiation	-	BIOGRID
478027	2538775	2541493	275357	277995	SPCC23B6.05c	SPAC27E2.10c	ssb3	rfc3	rpa3	SPAPJ698.01c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Cavero S (2010)	20885790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to CPT, MMS, HU and UV radiation	-	BIOGRID
478028	2538775	2543164	275357	279595	SPCC23B6.05c	SPAC3G6.06c	ssb3	rad2	rpa3	fen1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Cavero S (2010)	20885790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to CPT, MMS, HU and UV radiation	-	BIOGRID
478029	2538775	2541051	275357	277566	SPCC23B6.05c	SPBC3E7.08c	ssb3	rad13	rpa3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Cavero S (2010)	20885790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to CPT, MMS, HU and UV radiation	-	BIOGRID
478030	2538775	2540887	275357	277404	SPCC23B6.05c	SPBC4F6.15c	ssb3	swi10	rpa3	rad23	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Cavero S (2010)	20885790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to CPT, MMS, HU and UV radiation	-	BIOGRID
478031	2538775	2543580	275357	279995	SPCC23B6.05c	SPAC644.14c	ssb3	rad51	rpa3	rhp51	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Cavero S (2010)	20885790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to CPT, MMS, HU and UV radiation	-	BIOGRID
478032	2538775	2543685	275357	280099	SPCC23B6.05c	SPAC3C7.03c	ssb3	rad55	rpa3	rhp55	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Cavero S (2010)	20885790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to CPT, MMS, HU and UV radiation	-	BIOGRID
478033	2538775	2540574	275357	277101	SPCC23B6.05c	SPBC409.03	ssb3	swi5	rpa3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Cavero S (2010)	20885790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to CPT, MMS, HU and UV radiation	-	BIOGRID
478034	2538775	2540584	275357	277110	SPCC23B6.05c	SPBC28F2.07	ssb3	sfr1	rpa3	dds20|mug13	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Cavero S (2010)	20885790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to CPT, MMS, HU and UV radiation	-	BIOGRID
478035	2538775	2541071	275357	277586	SPCC23B6.05c	SPBC582.05c	ssb3	brc1	rpa3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Cavero S (2010)	20885790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to CPT, MMS, HU and UV radiation	-	BIOGRID
478079	852499	2542337	32897	278803	YBR200W	SPAC16E8.09	BEM1	scd1	SRO1|phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate-binding protein BEM1|L000000167	ral1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ito T (2001)	11483497	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
478080	2541726	2542337	278220	278803	SPAC22H10.07	SPAC16E8.09	scd2	scd1	ral3	ral1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ito T (2001)	11483497	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
478081	2541726	851190	278220	31724	SPAC22H10.07	YAL041W	scd2	CDC24	ral3	CLS4|Rho family guanine nucleotide exchange factor CDC24|L000000262	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ito T (2001)	11483497	284812	559292	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
478092	2539020	2540541	275593	277068	SPCC5E4.06	SPBC1A4.03c	smc6	top2	rad18	ptr11	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Outwin EA (2009)	19528228	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable|mitotic recombination	top2-191 allele is temperature sensitive	-	BIOGRID
478093	2542312	2540541	278778	277068	SPAC16A10.06c	SPBC1A4.03c	nse2	top2	pli2	ptr11	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Outwin EA (2009)	19528228	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	top2-191 allele is temperature sensitive	-	BIOGRID
478094	2540802	2540541	277321	277068	SPBC1921.02	SPBC1A4.03c	rad60	top2	-	ptr11	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Outwin EA (2009)	19528228	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	top2-191 allele is temperature sensitive	-	BIOGRID
478096	2539020	2541071	275593	277586	SPCC5E4.06	SPBC582.05c	smc6	brc1	rad18	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Outwin EA (2009)	19528228	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	overexpression of brc1 rescues sensitivity to HU in a an smc6 mutant strain	-	BIOGRID
478097	2539020	2539442	275593	276005	SPCC5E4.06	SPCC5E4.04	smc6	cut1	rad18	ptr4	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Outwin EA (2009)	19528228	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|resistance to chemicals:wild type	genetic complex|overexpression of cut1 rescues HU sensitivity in an smc6 mutant|overexpression of cut1 rescues temperature sensitivity in an smc6/top2 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
478098	2540541	2539442	277068	276005	SPBC1A4.03c	SPCC5E4.04	top2	cut1	ptr11	ptr4	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Outwin EA (2009)	19528228	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	genetic complex|overexpression of cut1 rescues temperature sensitivity in an smc6/top2 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
478099	2540541	2539442	277068	276005	SPBC1A4.03c	SPCC5E4.04	top2	cut1	ptr11	ptr4	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Outwin EA (2009)	19528228	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	overexpression of cut1 is lethal in a top2 mutant background	-	BIOGRID
478100	2541089	2540329	277604	276859	SPBC646.09c	SPBC29B5.01	int6	atf1	yin6	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nemoto N (2010)	20875427	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	overexpression of atf1 rescues sensitivity to 3AT in a int6 mutant background	-	BIOGRID
478101	2538775	2538959	275357	275533	SPCC23B6.05c	SPCC18B5.11c	ssb3	cds1	rpa3	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Cavero S (2010)	20885790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	deletion of cds1 decreases the sensitivity of ssb3 mutants to MMS and CPT	-	BIOGRID
478102	2539020	2540802	275593	277321	SPCC5E4.06	SPBC1921.02	smc6	rad60	rad18	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Boyd LK (2010)	20885950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	overexpression of rad60 can partially restore growth in an smc6 mutant in the presence of MMS	-	BIOGRID
478103	2542380	2538999	278844	275573	SPAC17G6.04c	SPCC162.09c	cpp1	hmg1	-	its12	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Imagawa K (2009)	20847589	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
478104	2542409	2540650	278873	277175	SPAC17G8.10c	SPBC244.01c	dma1	sid4	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Li WZ (2010)	20980623	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
478105	2542409	2539149	278873	275721	SPAC17G8.10c	SPCC1739.11c	dma1	cdc11	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Li WZ (2010)	20980623	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
478106	2542409	2543520	278873	279938	SPAC17G8.10c	SPAC607.10	dma1	spo3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Li WZ (2010)	20980623	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation	-	-	BIOGRID
478107	2542409	2542761	278873	279211	SPAC17G8.10c	SPAC1565.06c	dma1	spg1	-	sid3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Li WZ (2010)	20980623	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation	-	-	BIOGRID
478108	2542409	2540845	278873	277362	SPAC17G8.10c	SPBC428.13c	dma1	mob1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Li WZ (2010)	20980623	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation	-	-	BIOGRID
478109	2542409	2539482	278873	276045	SPAC17G8.10c	SPCC417.06c	dma1	mug27	-	ppk35|slk1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Li WZ (2010)	20980623	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation	-	-	BIOGRID
478110	2542409	2539482	278873	276045	SPAC17G8.10c	SPCC417.06c	dma1	mug27	-	ppk35|slk1	Co-purification	physical	Li WZ (2010)	20980623	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
478111	2542510	2540531	278968	277059	SPAC1851.04c	SPBC23E6.08	ric1	sat1	SPAC27D7.01c|sat4|vas3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tatebe H (2010)	21035342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
478112	2540531	2542510	277059	278968	SPBC23E6.08	SPAC1851.04c	sat1	ric1	-	SPAC27D7.01c|sat4|vas3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tatebe H (2010)	21035342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
478113	2542510	2543529	278968	279947	SPAC1851.04c	SPAC4C5.02c	ric1	ryh1	SPAC27D7.01c|sat4|vas3	hos1|sat7	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tatebe H (2010)	21035342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
478114	2542510	2543529	278968	279947	SPAC1851.04c	SPAC4C5.02c	ric1	ryh1	SPAC27D7.01c|sat4|vas3	hos1|sat7	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Tatebe H (2010)	21035342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:undetermined	expression of ryh1 rescues sensitivity to calcium chloride	-	BIOGRID
478115	2540531	2543529	277059	279947	SPBC23E6.08	SPAC4C5.02c	sat1	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Tatebe H (2010)	21035342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:undetermined	expression of ryh1 rescues sensitivity to calcium chloride	-	BIOGRID
478116	2542219	2543529	278693	279947	SPAC18G6.03	SPAC4C5.02c	ypt3	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tatebe H (2010)	21035342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification:wild type	GTP bound ryh1 restores gad8 phosphorylation in a ypt3 mutant	-	BIOGRID
478299	2543529	2539206	279947	275776	SPAC4C5.02c	SPCC24B10.07	ryh1	gad8	hos1|sat7	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tatebe H (2010)	21035342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	GTP bound ryh1 causes temperature sensitivity which is suppressed by the expression of gad8 which cannot be hyperphosphorylated	-	BIOGRID
478300	2543529	2540645	279947	277170	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC21B10.05c	ryh1	pop3	hos1|sat7	wat1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tatebe H (2010)	21035342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
478301	2539206	2542972	275776	279411	SPCC24B10.07	SPAPYUG7.02c	gad8	sin1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tatebe H (2010)	21035342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
478302	2543529	2542972	279947	279411	SPAC4C5.02c	SPAPYUG7.02c	ryh1	sin1	hos1|sat7	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tatebe H (2010)	21035342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
478303	2543529	2540473	279947	277001	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC30D10.10c	ryh1	tor1	hos1|sat7	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tatebe H (2010)	21035342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
478304	2543529	2539845	279947	276393	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC12C2.02c	ryh1	ste20	hos1|sat7	ste16	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tatebe H (2010)	21035342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
478305	2543529	5870	279947	111808	SPAC4C5.02c	-	ryh1	RAB6A	hos1|sat7	RAB6	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Tatebe H (2010)	21035342	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|osmotic stress resistance:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	Human RAB6 rescues sensitivity to caclium chloride, osmotic stress and temperature stress in a ryh1 null mutant	-	BIOGRID
478306	2540719	2538706	277242	275290	SPBC216.05	SPCC338.08	rad3	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Limbo O (2010)	21098122	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue|protein/peptide modification:partial rescue	deletion of ctp1 increases chk1 phosphorylation in a rad3 mutant background	-	BIOGRID
478307	2540719	3361306	277242	280382	SPBC216.05	SPBC6B1.09c	rad3	nbs1	-	slr10	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Limbo O (2010)	21098122	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	deletion of mre11 increases sensitivity to UV radiation in a rad3/cpt1 mutant background|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
478308	2540719	2538706	277242	275290	SPBC216.05	SPCC338.08	rad3	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Limbo O (2010)	21098122	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue	deletion of ctp1 decreases sensitivity to radiation compared to a rad3 single mutant	-	BIOGRID
478309	2538706	2540719	275290	277242	SPCC338.08	SPBC216.05	ctp1	rad3	mug38|nip1|slr9	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Limbo O (2010)	21098122	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionizing radiation resistance:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	deletion of rad3 decreases sensitivity to radiation and CPT compared to a ctp1 single mutant	-	BIOGRID
478310	2540719	2539087	277242	275659	SPBC216.05	SPCC1259.13	rad3	chk1	-	rad27	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Limbo O (2010)	21098122	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	stress resistance:partial rescue	deletion of chk1 abolishes the rescue of ctp1 cells by rad3 in response to stress	-	BIOGRID
478311	2540719	2538959	277242	275533	SPBC216.05	SPCC18B5.11c	rad3	cds1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Limbo O (2010)	21098122	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	stress resistance:partial rescue	deletion of cds1 abolishes the rescue of ctp1 cells by rad3 in response to some stresses	-	BIOGRID
478312	2540719	2539209	277242	275779	SPBC216.05	SPCC23B6.03c	rad3	tel1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Limbo O (2010)	21098122	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	deletion of tel1 completely abolishes phosphorylation of chk1 compared to a ctp1/rad3 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
478313	2538706	2539209	275290	275779	SPCC338.08	SPCC23B6.03c	ctp1	tel1	mug38|nip1|slr9	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Limbo O (2010)	21098122	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	deletion of tel1 completely abolishes phosphorylation of chk1 compared to a ctp1/rad3 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
478326	2540719	2540992	277242	277508	SPBC216.05	SPBC342.05	rad3	crb2	-	rhp9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Limbo O (2010)	21098122	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	deletion of crb2 completely abolishes phosphorylation of chk1 compared to a ctp1/rad3 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
478327	2538706	2540992	275290	277508	SPCC338.08	SPBC342.05	ctp1	crb2	mug38|nip1|slr9	rhp9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Limbo O (2010)	21098122	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	deletion of crb2 completely abolishes phosphorylation of chk1 compared to a ctp1/rad3 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
478328	2540719	2541746	277242	278240	SPBC216.05	SPAC20G4.04c	rad3	hus1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Limbo O (2010)	21098122	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	deletion of hus1 completely abolishes phosphorylation of chk1 compared to a ctp1/rad3 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
478329	2538706	2541746	275290	278240	SPCC338.08	SPAC20G4.04c	ctp1	hus1	mug38|nip1|slr9	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Limbo O (2010)	21098122	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	deletion of hus1 completely abolishes phosphorylation of chk1 compared to a ctp1/rad3 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
478330	2540719	2541746	277242	278240	SPBC216.05	SPAC20G4.04c	rad3	hus1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Limbo O (2010)	21098122	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionizing radiation resistance|vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show increased sensitivity to radiation	-	BIOGRID
478331	2538706	2541746	275290	278240	SPCC338.08	SPAC20G4.04c	ctp1	hus1	mug38|nip1|slr9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Limbo O (2010)	21098122	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionizing radiation resistance|vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show increased sensitivity to radiation	-	BIOGRID
478332	2540719	2540992	277242	277508	SPBC216.05	SPBC342.05	rad3	crb2	-	rhp9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Limbo O (2010)	21098122	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionizing radiation resistance|vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show increased sensitivity to radiation	-	BIOGRID
478333	2538706	2540992	275290	277508	SPCC338.08	SPBC342.05	ctp1	crb2	mug38|nip1|slr9	rhp9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Limbo O (2010)	21098122	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionizing radiation resistance|vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show increased sensitivity to radiation	-	BIOGRID
478334	2540719	2542226	277242	278699	SPBC216.05	SPAC19G12.06c	rad3	hta2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Limbo O (2010)	21098122	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionizing radiation resistance|vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show increased sensitivity to radiation	-	BIOGRID
478335	2538706	2542226	275290	278699	SPCC338.08	SPAC19G12.06c	ctp1	hta2	mug38|nip1|slr9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Limbo O (2010)	21098122	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionizing radiation resistance|vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show increased sensitivity to radiation	-	BIOGRID
478336	2538706	3361306	275290	280382	SPCC338.08	SPBC6B1.09c	ctp1	nbs1	mug38|nip1|slr9	slr10	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Limbo O (2010)	21098122	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	deletion of mre11 completely abolishes phosphorylation of chk1 compared to a ctp1/rad3 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
478337	2540719	3361306	277242	280382	SPBC216.05	SPBC6B1.09c	rad3	nbs1	-	slr10	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Limbo O (2010)	21098122	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	deletion of mre11 completely abolishes phosphorylation of chk1 compared to a ctp1/rad3 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
478338	2538706	3361306	275290	280382	SPCC338.08	SPBC6B1.09c	ctp1	nbs1	mug38|nip1|slr9	slr10	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Limbo O (2010)	21098122	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	deletion of mre11 increases sensitivity to UV radiation in a rad3/cpt1 mutant background|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
478339	2539467	2543576	276030	279991	SPCC417.07c	SPAC4A8.05c	mto1	myp2	mbo1|mod20	myo3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Samejima I (2010)	20970338	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
478340	2539467	2539149	276030	275721	SPCC417.07c	SPCC1739.11c	mto1	cdc11	mbo1|mod20	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Samejima I (2010)	20970338	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
478341	2539047	2540894	275620	277410	SPCC1223.06	SPBC530.04	tea1	mod5	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bicho CC (2010)	20850323	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
478343	2540894	2540223	277410	276756	SPBC530.04	SPBC32F12.04	mod5	gtb1	-	tug1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bicho CC (2010)	20850323	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
478344	2539047	2539047	275620	275620	SPCC1223.06	SPCC1223.06	tea1	tea1	alp8	alp8	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bicho CC (2010)	20850323	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
478345	2539205	2539703	275775	276256	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC16G5.15c	mid1	fkh2	dmf1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Agarwal M (2010)	21098635	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
478346	2539205	2539703	275775	276256	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC16G5.15c	mid1	fkh2	dmf1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Agarwal M (2010)	21098635	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
478347	2539205	2540866	275775	277383	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC4C3.12	mid1	sep1	dmf1	SPBC4C3.05	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Agarwal M (2010)	21098635	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
478348	2539205	2542358	275775	278823	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC1782.09c	mid1	clp1	dmf1	flp1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Agarwal M (2010)	21098635	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation|cell shape	double mutants show aberrant RNA expression and a synthetic shape phenotype	-	BIOGRID
478477	2540593	2539920	277119	276464	SPBC28E12.03	SPBC119.08	rga4	pmk1	-	spm1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Cansado J (2010)	21057634	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|sporulation	double mutants show increased abnormalities in morphology and sporulation	-	BIOGRID
478478	2539101	2542018	275673	278501	SPCC736.04c	SPAC5H10.11	gma12	gmh1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ohashi T (2010)	21098516	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	The septuple mutant (gma12 and gmh1-6) shows a severe reduction in galactomannoproteins|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
478479	2539101	2542227	275673	278700	SPCC736.04c	SPAC5H10.13c	gma12	gmh2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ohashi T (2010)	21098516	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	The septuple mutant (gma12 and gmh1-6) shows a severe reduction in galactomannoproteins|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
478480	2539101	2541748	275673	278242	SPCC736.04c	SPAC22E12.06c	gma12	gmh3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ohashi T (2010)	21098516	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	The septuple mutant (gma12 and gmh1-6) shows a severe reduction in galactomannoproteins|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
478481	2539101	2541250	275673	277764	SPCC736.04c	SPBC8D2.17	gma12	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ohashi T (2010)	21098516	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	The septuple mutant (gma12 and gmh1-6) shows a severe reduction in galactomannoproteins|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
478482	2539101	2543384	275673	279806	SPCC736.04c	SPAC637.06	gma12	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ohashi T (2010)	21098516	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	The septuple mutant (gma12 and gmh1-6) shows a severe reduction in galactomannoproteins|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
478483	2539101	2540001	275673	276545	SPCC736.04c	SPBC1289.13c	gma12	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ohashi T (2010)	21098516	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	The septuple mutant (gma12 and gmh1-6) shows a severe reduction in galactomannoproteins|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
478484	2542018	2542227	278501	278700	SPAC5H10.11	SPAC5H10.13c	gmh1	gmh2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ohashi T (2010)	21098516	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	The septuple mutant (gma12 and gmh1-6) shows a severe reduction in galactomannoproteins|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
478485	2542018	2541748	278501	278242	SPAC5H10.11	SPAC22E12.06c	gmh1	gmh3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ohashi T (2010)	21098516	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	The septuple mutant (gma12 and gmh1-6) shows a severe reduction in galactomannoproteins|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
478486	2542018	2541250	278501	277764	SPAC5H10.11	SPBC8D2.17	gmh1	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ohashi T (2010)	21098516	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	The septuple mutant (gma12 and gmh1-6) shows a severe reduction in galactomannoproteins|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
478487	2542018	2543384	278501	279806	SPAC5H10.11	SPAC637.06	gmh1	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ohashi T (2010)	21098516	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	The septuple mutant (gma12 and gmh1-6) shows a severe reduction in galactomannoproteins|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
478488	2542018	2540001	278501	276545	SPAC5H10.11	SPBC1289.13c	gmh1	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ohashi T (2010)	21098516	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	The septuple mutant (gma12 and gmh1-6) shows a severe reduction in galactomannoproteins|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
478489	2542227	2541748	278700	278242	SPAC5H10.13c	SPAC22E12.06c	gmh2	gmh3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ohashi T (2010)	21098516	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	The septuple mutant (gma12 and gmh1-6) shows a severe reduction in galactomannoproteins|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
478490	2542227	2541250	278700	277764	SPAC5H10.13c	SPBC8D2.17	gmh2	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ohashi T (2010)	21098516	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	The septuple mutant (gma12 and gmh1-6) shows a severe reduction in galactomannoproteins|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
478491	2542227	2543384	278700	279806	SPAC5H10.13c	SPAC637.06	gmh2	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ohashi T (2010)	21098516	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	The septuple mutant (gma12 and gmh1-6) shows a severe reduction in galactomannoproteins|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
478492	2542227	2540001	278700	276545	SPAC5H10.13c	SPBC1289.13c	gmh2	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ohashi T (2010)	21098516	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	The septuple mutant (gma12 and gmh1-6) shows a severe reduction in galactomannoproteins|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
478493	2541748	2541250	278242	277764	SPAC22E12.06c	SPBC8D2.17	gmh3	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ohashi T (2010)	21098516	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	The septuple mutant (gma12 and gmh1-6) shows a severe reduction in galactomannoproteins|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
478494	2541748	2543384	278242	279806	SPAC22E12.06c	SPAC637.06	gmh3	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ohashi T (2010)	21098516	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	The septuple mutant (gma12 and gmh1-6) shows a severe reduction in galactomannoproteins|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
478495	2541748	2540001	278242	276545	SPAC22E12.06c	SPBC1289.13c	gmh3	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ohashi T (2010)	21098516	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	The septuple mutant (gma12 and gmh1-6) shows a severe reduction in galactomannoproteins|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
478496	2541250	2543384	277764	279806	SPBC8D2.17	SPAC637.06	gmh4	gmh5	SPBC8D2.17	SPAC637.06	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ohashi T (2010)	21098516	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	The septuple mutant (gma12 and gmh1-6) shows a severe reduction in galactomannoproteins|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
478497	2541250	2540001	277764	276545	SPBC8D2.17	SPBC1289.13c	gmh4	gmh6	SPBC8D2.17	SPBC1289.13c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ohashi T (2010)	21098516	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	The septuple mutant (gma12 and gmh1-6) shows a severe reduction in galactomannoproteins|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
478498	2543384	2540001	279806	276545	SPAC637.06	SPBC1289.13c	gmh5	gmh6	SPAC637.06	SPBC1289.13c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ohashi T (2010)	21098516	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	The septuple mutant (gma12 and gmh1-6) shows a severe reduction in galactomannoproteins|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
478507	2543039	2541649	279474	278145	SPAC3A12.14	SPAC1F3.06c	cam1	spo15	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Itadani A (2010)	20833892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
478508	2543039	9407224	279474	1028587	SPAC3A12.14	SPBC16C6.14	cam1	spo2	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Itadani A (2010)	20833892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
478509	2543039	9407039	279474	1028402	SPAC3A12.14	SPCC1183.12	cam1	spo13	-	SPNGAF60|SPNCRNA.546	Co-localization	physical	Itadani A (2010)	20833892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
478513	2543039	2541649	279474	278145	SPAC3A12.14	SPAC1F3.06c	cam1	spo15	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Itadani A (2010)	20833892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
478524	2542732	2539403	279182	275968	SPAC25G10.07c	SPCC736.11	cut7	ago1	-	csp9	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Stoica C (2010)	19883398	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
478526	2542732	2538930	279182	275506	SPAC25G10.07c	SPCC188.13c	cut7	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Stoica C (2010)	19883398	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
478527	2542732	2542198	279182	278673	SPAC25G10.07c	SPAC6F12.09	cut7	rdp1	-	rdr1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Stoica C (2010)	19883398	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
478531	2542513	2540821	278971	277339	SPAC1952.05	SPBC800.03	gcn5	clr3	kat2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Johnsson A (2009)	19633696	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|hyperosmotic stress resistance:wild type|protein/peptide modification:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:wild type	Mycophenolic acid (MPA) (CHEBI:168396 and PubChem CID: 446541)	-	BIOGRID
478570	2542513	2543643	278971	280057	SPAC1952.05	SPAC3G9.07c	gcn5	hos2	kat2	hda1|phd1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Johnsson A (2009)	19633696	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|hyperosmotic stress resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
478885	2543639	2539480	280053	276043	SPAC458.03	SPCC622.13c	tel2	tti1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takai H (2010)	20801936	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
478886	2543639	2539771	280053	276322	SPAC458.03	SPBC1604.17c	tel2	tti2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takai H (2010)	20801936	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479309	853358	2542158	33670	278634	YJL087C	SPAC17G8.01c	TRL1	trl1	LIG1|RLG1|tRNA ligase|L000002336	SPAC6C3.10c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Mori T (2010)	20844078	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	S pombe rlg1 complements growth defects in S. cerevisiae rlg1 null mutants	-	BIOGRID
479486	2538959	2540309	275533	276839	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC21B10.13c	cds1	yox1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Gomez-Escoda B (2010)	21132016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	Hydroxyurea (CHEBI:44423 and PubChem CID: 3657)	-	BIOGRID
479494	2540234	2540309	276766	276839	SPBC336.12c	SPBC21B10.13c	cdc10	yox1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gomez-Escoda B (2010)	21132016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479498	2540234	2541871	276766	278361	SPBC336.12c	SPAC22F3.09c	cdc10	res2	-	mcs1|pct1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gomez-Escoda B (2010)	21132016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479499	2540234	2541871	276766	278361	SPBC336.12c	SPAC22F3.09c	cdc10	res2	-	mcs1|pct1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Gomez-Escoda B (2010)	21132016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479500	2540234	2541153	276766	277668	SPBC336.12c	SPBC725.16	cdc10	res1	-	sct1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Gomez-Escoda B (2010)	21132016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479501	2540234	2540309	276766	276839	SPBC336.12c	SPBC21B10.13c	cdc10	yox1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Gomez-Escoda B (2010)	21132016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479668	2539930	2539123	276474	275695	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC18B5.03	reb1	wee1	SPBC660.01c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Rodriguez-Sanchez L (2010)	21118960	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	reb1 wee1-50 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
479669	2539930	2539123	276474	275695	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC18B5.03	reb1	wee1	SPBC660.01c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rodriguez-Sanchez L (2010)	21118960	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in G1 phase	reb1 wee1-50 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
479670	2539930	2540234	276474	276766	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC336.12c	reb1	cdc10	SPBC660.01c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Rodriguez-Sanchez L (2010)	21118960	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	reb1 cdc10-129 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
479671	2539930	2540234	276474	276766	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC336.12c	reb1	cdc10	SPBC660.01c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rodriguez-Sanchez L (2010)	21118960	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in G1 phase	reb1 cdc10-129 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
479678	2539123	2540309	275695	276839	SPCC18B5.03	SPBC21B10.13c	wee1	yox1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Gomez-Escoda B (2010)	21132016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	Hydroxyurea (CHEBI:44423 and PubChem CID: 3657)	-	BIOGRID
479679	2542207	2540719	278682	277242	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC216.05	ddb1	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Holmberg C (2005)	15805471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
479680	2542207	2538959	278682	275533	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC18B5.11c	ddb1	cds1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Holmberg C (2005)	15805471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
479681	2542207	2539087	278682	275659	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC1259.13	ddb1	chk1	-	rad27	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Holmberg C (2005)	15805471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
479683	2542207	2542696	278682	279149	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC29B12.03	ddb1	spd1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Holmberg C (2005)	15805471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	Deletion of SPD1 suppresses synthetic lethality of ddb1 rad3, ddb1 chk1, and ddb1 cds1 double mutants.	-	BIOGRID
479685	2540352	2542696	276881	279149	SPBC215.03c	SPAC29B12.03	csn1	spd1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Holmberg C (2005)	15805471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue|meiosis:wild type|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	Methyl methanesulfonate (CHEBI:25255 and PubChem CID: 4156)	-	BIOGRID
479714	2540719	2541604	277242	278101	SPBC216.05	SPAC14C4.03	rad3	mek1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Tougan T (2010)	21084840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479715	2539209	2541604	275779	278101	SPCC23B6.03c	SPAC14C4.03	tel1	mek1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Tougan T (2010)	21084840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479716	2541604	2541604	278101	278101	SPAC14C4.03	SPAC14C4.03	mek1	mek1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Tougan T (2010)	21084840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479717	2541604	2539004	278101	275578	SPAC14C4.03	SPCC4G3.05c	mek1	mus81	-	slx3	Biochemical Activity	physical	Tougan T (2010)	21084840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479718	2538959	2539004	275533	275578	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC4G3.05c	cds1	mus81	-	slx3	Biochemical Activity	physical	Tougan T (2010)	21084840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479719	2541604	2541798	278101	278289	SPAC14C4.03	SPAC22F3.03c	mek1	rdh54	-	mug34|tid1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Tougan T (2010)	21084840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479721	2538959	2539123	275533	275695	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC18B5.03	cds1	wee1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Matsumoto S (2010)	21099360	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479722	2541165	2543240	277680	279668	SPBC776.12c	SPAC694.06c	hsk1	mrc1	cdc7	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Matsumoto S (2010)	21099360	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479723	2540719	2543240	277242	279668	SPBC216.05	SPAC694.06c	rad3	mrc1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Matsumoto S (2010)	21099360	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479730	2542358	2540643	278823	277168	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC19G7.06	clp1	mbx1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Papadopoulou K (2010)	21098641	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479731	2540643	2542358	277168	278823	SPBC19G7.06	SPAC1782.09c	mbx1	clp1	-	flp1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Papadopoulou K (2010)	21098641	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479732	2542358	2540643	278823	277168	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC19G7.06	clp1	mbx1	flp1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Papadopoulou K (2010)	21098641	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479733	2542358	2540643	278823	277168	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC19G7.06	clp1	mbx1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Papadopoulou K (2010)	21098641	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479734	2542358	2540643	278823	277168	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC19G7.06	clp1	mbx1	flp1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Papadopoulou K (2010)	21098641	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479736	2542358	2540643	278823	277168	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC19G7.06	clp1	mbx1	flp1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Papadopoulou K (2010)	21098641	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Dephosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479737	2539869	2540643	276415	277168	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC19G7.06	cdc2	mbx1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Papadopoulou K (2010)	21098641	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479738	2542358	2539703	278823	276256	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC16G5.15c	clp1	fkh2	flp1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Papadopoulou K (2010)	21098641	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
479740	2542358	2541957	278823	278444	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC23C11.16	clp1	plo1	flp1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Papadopoulou K (2010)	21098641	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|cell size|vegetative growth	clp1 plo1-ts35 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
479741	2541957	2540643	278444	277168	SPAC23C11.16	SPBC19G7.06	plo1	mbx1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Papadopoulou K (2010)	21098641	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
479742	2541957	2542358	278444	278823	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC1782.09c	plo1	clp1	-	flp1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Papadopoulou K (2010)	21098641	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
479743	2540128	2540219	276665	276752	SPBC15D4.03	SPBC31F10.13c	slm9	hip1	-	hir1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479744	2540128	2540128	276665	276665	SPBC15D4.03	SPBC15D4.03	slm9	slm9	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479745	2540128	2540227	276665	276759	SPBC15D4.03	SPBC31F10.14c	slm9	hip3	-	hir3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479746	2540128	2541544	276665	278044	SPBC15D4.03	SPAC22G7.06c	slm9	ura1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479747	2540128	2541284	276665	277797	SPBC15D4.03	SPBC947.08c	slm9	hip4	-	hpc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479748	2540128	2540550	276665	277077	SPBC15D4.03	SPBC25H2.02	slm9	trs1	-	ths1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479749	2540128	2543539	276665	279956	SPBC15D4.03	SPAC926.04c	slm9	hsp90	-	git10|swo1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479750	2540128	2542937	276665	279378	SPBC15D4.03	SPAC10F6.03c	slm9	cts1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479751	2540128	2540939	276665	277455	SPBC15D4.03	SPBC4.07c	slm9	rpt2	-	mts2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479752	2540128	2539539	276665	276101	SPBC15D4.03	SPCC576.10c	slm9	rpt3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479753	2540128	2540900	276665	277416	SPBC15D4.03	SPBC530.10c	slm9	anc1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479754	2540128	2539815	276665	276365	SPBC15D4.03	SPBC1105.02c	slm9	lys4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479755	2540128	2539691	276665	276245	SPBC15D4.03	SPBC12D12.03	slm9	cct1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479756	2540128	2540305	276665	276835	SPBC15D4.03	SPBC337.05c	slm9	cct8	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479757	2540128	2539048	276665	275621	SPBC15D4.03	SPCC1223.08c	slm9	dfr1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479758	2540128	2542920	276665	279361	SPBC15D4.03	SPAC10F6.01c	slm9	sir1	-	SPAC4C5.05c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479759	2540128	2540582	276665	277108	SPBC15D4.03	SPBC26H8.07c	slm9	nda3	-	alp12|ben1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479760	2540128	2541034	276665	277549	SPBC15D4.03	SPBC405.01	slm9	ade1	-	SPBC4C3.02c|min4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479761	2540128	2542029	276665	278511	SPBC15D4.03	SPAC8E11.02c	slm9	rad24	-	anr5|sam4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479762	2540128	2540455	276665	276983	SPBC15D4.03	SPBC215.05	slm9	gpd1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479763	2540128	2539295	276665	275863	SPBC15D4.03	SPCC417.08	slm9	tef3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479764	2540128	2542744	276665	279194	SPBC15D4.03	SPAC1565.08	slm9	cdc48	-	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479765	2540128	2541345	276665	277856	SPBC15D4.03	SPBP35G2.07	slm9	ilv1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479766	2540128	3361514	276665	280590	SPBC15D4.03	SPAC110.04c	slm9	pss1	-	SPAP14E8.01c|ssp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479767	2540128	2541268	276665	277782	SPBC15D4.03	SPBP19A11.03c	slm9	mts4	-	rpn1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479768	2540128	2543408	276665	279830	SPBC15D4.03	SPAC637.05c	slm9	vma2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479769	2540128	2540936	276665	277452	SPBC15D4.03	SPBC800.05c	slm9	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479770	2540128	2540964	276665	277480	SPBC15D4.03	SPBC365.16	slm9	SPBC365.16	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479771	2540128	3361462	276665	280538	SPBC15D4.03	SPAC3A11.12c	slm9	rpt5	-	pam2|tbp1|SPAC3H5.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479772	2540128	2541927	276665	278415	SPBC15D4.03	SPAC222.12c	slm9	atp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479773	2540128	2543603	276665	280018	SPBC15D4.03	SPAC4A8.08c	slm9	vrs2	-	ValRS2|vas2|vas1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479774	2540128	2540767	276665	277287	SPBC15D4.03	SPBC19C2.07	slm9	fba1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479775	2540128	2542408	276665	278872	SPBC15D4.03	SPAC17A5.15c	slm9	gus1	-	SPAC17A5.15c|ers1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479776	2540128	2543227	276665	279655	SPBC15D4.03	SPAPB8E5.09	slm9	rvb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479777	2540128	2541128	276665	277643	SPBC15D4.03	SPBC646.11	slm9	cct6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479778	2540128	2539267	276665	275837	SPBC15D4.03	SPCC1827.06c	slm9	SPCC1827.06c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479779	2540128	2539764	276665	276315	SPBC15D4.03	SPBC14F5.04c	slm9	pgk1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479780	2540128	2540053	276665	276591	SPBC15D4.03	SPBC106.06	slm9	cct4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479781	2540128	2539189	276665	275760	SPBC15D4.03	SPCC1682.16	slm9	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479782	2540128	2542875	276665	279320	SPBC15D4.03	SPAC13G7.02c	slm9	ssa1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479783	2540128	2539862	276665	276409	SPBC15D4.03	SPBC16C6.07c	slm9	rpt1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479784	2541284	2540219	277797	276752	SPBC947.08c	SPBC31F10.13c	hip4	hip1	hpc2	hir1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479785	2541284	2540227	277797	276759	SPBC947.08c	SPBC31F10.14c	hip4	hip3	hpc2	hir3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479786	2541284	2540128	277797	276665	SPBC947.08c	SPBC15D4.03	hip4	slm9	hpc2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Anderson HE (2010)	20976105	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479787	2541028	2543040	277543	279475	SPBC577.08c	SPAC31G5.13	txl1	rpn11	trx3	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Andersen KM (2010)	21091378	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479788	2541314	2543040	277826	279475	SPBP35G2.02	SPAC31G5.13	txc1	rpn11	SPBP35G2.02	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Andersen KM (2010)	21091378	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479789	2541314	2541268	277826	277782	SPBP35G2.02	SPBP19A11.03c	txc1	mts4	SPBP35G2.02	rpn1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Andersen KM (2010)	21091378	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479790	2541028	2541268	277543	277782	SPBC577.08c	SPBP19A11.03c	txl1	mts4	trx3	rpn1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Andersen KM (2010)	21091378	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479791	2541314	2541268	277826	277782	SPBP35G2.02	SPBP19A11.03c	txc1	mts4	SPBP35G2.02	rpn1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Andersen KM (2010)	21091378	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479792	2541028	2541268	277543	277782	SPBC577.08c	SPBP19A11.03c	txl1	mts4	trx3	rpn1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Andersen KM (2010)	21091378	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479793	2541028	2542184	277543	278659	SPBC577.08c	SPAC17C9.13c	txl1	cut8	trx3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Andersen KM (2010)	21091378	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
479794	2541592	2541592	278089	278089	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC6F12.15c	cut9	cut9	dre1	dre1	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Zhang Z (2010)	20924356	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479795	2541592	2542045	278089	278526	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC23C11.12	cut9	hcn1	dre1	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Zhang Z (2010)	20924356	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479796	2540728	3361323	277251	280399	SPBC216.06c	SPBC30D10.04	swi1	swi3	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Tanaka T (2010)	20924116	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479797	2543240	2540728	279668	277251	SPAC694.06c	SPBC216.06c	mrc1	swi1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Tanaka T (2010)	20924116	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479798	2543240	3361323	279668	280399	SPAC694.06c	SPBC30D10.04	mrc1	swi3	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Tanaka T (2010)	20924116	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479799	2543240	2543240	279668	279668	SPAC694.06c	SPAC694.06c	mrc1	mrc1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Tanaka T (2010)	20924116	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479800	2542873	2541209	279318	277723	SPAC9G1.02	SPBC887.10	wis4	mcs4	wak1|wik1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Morigasaki S (2010)	20946853	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479801	2541209	2541178	277723	277692	SPBC887.10	SPBC725.02	mcs4	mpr1	-	spy1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Morigasaki S (2010)	20946853	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479802	2540547	2541209	277074	277723	SPBC32F12.11	SPBC887.10	tdh1	mcs4	gpd1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Morigasaki S (2010)	20946853	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479859	2543281	2541165	279708	277680	SPAC23C4.18c	SPBC776.12c	rad4	hsk1	cut5|dpb11|dre3	cdc7	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Furuya K (2010)	21095590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479860	2543281	2539399	279708	275964	SPAC23C4.18c	SPCC550.13	rad4	dfp1	cut5|dpb11|dre3	him1|rad35|dbf4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Furuya K (2010)	21095590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479864	2541165	2543281	277680	279708	SPBC776.12c	SPAC23C4.18c	hsk1	rad4	cdc7	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Biochemical Activity	physical	Furuya K (2010)	21095590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	Supplementary figure S4A	-	BIOGRID
479865	2541746	2543544	278240	279961	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC664.07c	hus1	rad9	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Furuya K (2010)	21095590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Supplementary figure S7A	-	BIOGRID
479866	2543544	2542558	279961	279014	SPAC664.07c	SPAC1952.07	rad9	rad1	-	rad19	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Furuya K (2010)	21095590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479867	2543544	2541643	279961	278139	SPAC664.07c	SPAC14C4.13	rad9	rad17	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Furuya K (2010)	21095590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479868	2543544	2540873	279961	277390	SPAC664.07c	SPBC4C3.05c	rad9	nuc1	-	rpa1|rpa190	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Furuya K (2010)	21095590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479869	2543544	2541280	279961	277793	SPAC664.07c	SPBP23A10.07	rad9	rpa2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Furuya K (2010)	21095590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479870	2543544	2540873	279961	277390	SPAC664.07c	SPBC4C3.05c	rad9	nuc1	-	rpa1|rpa190	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Furuya K (2010)	21095590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479880	2543544	2540873	279961	277390	SPAC664.07c	SPBC4C3.05c	rad9	nuc1	-	rpa1|rpa190	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Furuya K (2010)	21095590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479881	2543544	2541280	279961	277793	SPAC664.07c	SPBP23A10.07	rad9	rpa2	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Furuya K (2010)	21095590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479884	2543544	2541280	279961	277793	SPAC664.07c	SPBP23A10.07	rad9	rpa2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Furuya K (2010)	21095590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479885	2543544	2540873	279961	277390	SPAC664.07c	SPBC4C3.05c	rad9	nuc1	-	rpa1|rpa190	Two-hybrid	physical	Furuya K (2010)	21095590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479890	2541710	3361561	278205	280637	SPAC343.11c	SPAC11E3.01c	msc1	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Qiu X (2010)	20858896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479891	3361561	2541710	280637	278205	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC343.11c	swr1	msc1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Qiu X (2010)	20858896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479893	2541710	3361561	278205	280637	SPAC343.11c	SPAC11E3.01c	msc1	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Qiu X (2010)	20858896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479894	2541710	2541077	278205	277592	SPAC343.11c	SPBC83.08	msc1	rvb2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Qiu X (2010)	20858896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479895	2541710	2543227	278205	279655	SPAC343.11c	SPAPB8E5.09	msc1	rvb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Qiu X (2010)	20858896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479896	2541710	2542412	278205	278876	SPAC343.11c	SPAC9G1.13c	msc1	swc4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Qiu X (2010)	20858896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479897	2539505	2541710	276068	278205	SPCC736.14	SPAC343.11c	dis1	msc1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Qiu X (2010)	20858896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:wild type|viability:wild type	dis1-288	-	BIOGRID
479898	2539505	3361561	276068	280637	SPCC736.14	SPAC11E3.01c	dis1	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Qiu X (2010)	20858896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:wild type|viability:wild type	dis1-288	-	BIOGRID
479899	2541957	2541936	278444	278423	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC222.10c	plo1	byr4	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Johnson AE (2010)	21131906	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479967	2542059	2543043	278537	279478	SPAC328.06	SPAC3F10.13	ubp2	ucp6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479968	2541378	2541364	277889	277875	SPBP8B7.21	SPBP8B7.11	ubp3	nxt3	-	glp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479969	2540837	2542091	277355	278568	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC7D4.02c	ubp4	sfp47	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479971	2539385	2542168	275950	278643	SPCC188.08c	SPAC17A5.16	ubp5	ftp105	ubp22	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479974	2541819	2541268	278310	277782	SPAC6G9.08	SPBP19A11.03c	ubp6	mts4	-	rpn1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479975	2541819	3361462	278310	280538	SPAC6G9.08	SPAC3A11.12c	ubp6	rpt5	-	pam2|tbp1|SPAC3H5.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479976	2541819	2539862	278310	276409	SPAC6G9.08	SPBC16C6.07c	ubp6	rpt1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479977	2541819	2539189	278310	275760	SPAC6G9.08	SPCC1682.16	ubp6	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479978	2541819	2540487	278310	277015	SPAC6G9.08	SPBC23G7.12c	ubp6	rpt6	-	let1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479979	2541819	2540939	278310	277455	SPAC6G9.08	SPBC4.07c	ubp6	rpt2	-	mts2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479980	2541819	2539539	278310	276101	SPAC6G9.08	SPCC576.10c	ubp6	rpt3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479981	2541819	2540191	278310	276724	SPAC6G9.08	SPBC17D11.07c	ubp6	rpn2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479982	2541819	2542907	278310	279351	SPAC6G9.08	SPAC1420.03	ubp6	rpn501	-	rpn5|rpn5-a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479983	2541819	2540109	278310	276646	SPAC6G9.08	SPBC119.01	ubp6	rpn3	-	SPBPJ4664.07	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479984	2541819	2541807	278310	278298	SPAC6G9.08	SPAC23G3.11	ubp6	rpn6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479985	2541819	2540878	278310	277395	SPAC6G9.08	SPBC4C3.10c	ubp6	pre3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479986	2541819	2541139	278310	277654	SPAC6G9.08	SPBC646.16	ubp6	scl1	-	SPBC646.16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479987	2541819	2543205	278310	279634	SPAC6G9.08	SPAC323.02c	ubp6	pup2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479988	2541819	2542559	278310	279015	SPAC6G9.08	SPAC6G10.04c	ubp6	pre5	-	SPAC6G10.04c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479989	2542135	2538769	278611	275352	SPAC13A11.04c	SPCC126.04c	ubp8	sgf73	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479990	2542135	3361305	278611	280381	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC6B1.12c	ubp8	sus1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479991	2542135	2540787	278611	277306	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC1921.07c	ubp8	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479992	2542135	2541265	278611	277779	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBP16F5.03c	ubp8	tra1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479993	2540120	2543160	276657	279591	SPBC1703.12	SPAC31A2.14	ubp9	bun107	-	wdr48	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479994	2540120	2542950	276657	279390	SPBC1703.12	SPAC12B10.03	ubp9	bun62	-	wdr20	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479995	2540714	2543304	277237	279728	SPBC19C2.04c	SPAC6B12.12	ubp11	tom70	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479996	2540956	2540191	277472	276724	SPBC409.06	SPBC17D11.07c	uch2	rpn2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479997	2540956	2541268	277472	277782	SPBC409.06	SPBP19A11.03c	uch2	mts4	-	rpn1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479998	2540956	2539862	277472	276409	SPBC409.06	SPBC16C6.07c	uch2	rpt1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
479999	2540956	2539189	277472	275760	SPBC409.06	SPCC1682.16	uch2	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480000	2540956	3361462	277472	280538	SPBC409.06	SPAC3A11.12c	uch2	rpt5	-	pam2|tbp1|SPAC3H5.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480001	2540956	2540939	277472	277455	SPBC409.06	SPBC4.07c	uch2	rpt2	-	mts2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480002	2540956	2540487	277472	277015	SPBC409.06	SPBC23G7.12c	uch2	rpt6	-	let1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480003	2540956	2539539	277472	276101	SPBC409.06	SPCC576.10c	uch2	rpt3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480004	2540956	2540980	277472	277496	SPBC409.06	SPBC342.04	uch2	rpn1301	-	rpn13|rpn13a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480005	2540956	2542907	277472	279351	SPBC409.06	SPAC1420.03	uch2	rpn501	-	rpn5|rpn5-a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480006	2540956	2540109	277472	276646	SPBC409.06	SPBC119.01	uch2	rpn3	-	SPBPJ4664.07	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480007	2540956	2541807	277472	278298	SPBC409.06	SPAC23G3.11	uch2	rpn6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480008	2540956	2540794	277472	277313	SPBC409.06	SPBC582.07c	uch2	rpn7	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480009	2540956	2541139	277472	277654	SPBC409.06	SPBC646.16	uch2	scl1	-	SPBC646.16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480010	2540956	2539026	277472	275599	SPBC409.06	SPCC1442.06	uch2	pre8	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480011	2540956	2542559	277472	279015	SPBC409.06	SPAC6G10.04c	uch2	pre5	-	SPAC6G10.04c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480012	2540956	2540878	277472	277395	SPBC409.06	SPBC4C3.10c	uch2	pre3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480013	2540956	2538912	277472	275489	SPBC409.06	SPCC1682.10	uch2	rpn8	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480014	2540956	2543205	277472	279634	SPBC409.06	SPAC323.02c	uch2	pup2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480015	2540956	2543114	277472	279546	SPBC409.06	SPAC607.05	uch2	rpn9	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480016	2540956	2543623	277472	280037	SPBC409.06	SPAC4A8.13c	uch2	pts1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480017	2540956	3361455	277472	280531	SPBC409.06	SPAC1782.01	uch2	ecm29	-	SPAPYUG7.07	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480018	2540956	2540025	277472	276569	SPBC409.06	SPBC16G5.01	uch2	rpn12	-	SPBC342.07|mts3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480019	2540956	2543040	277472	279475	SPBC409.06	SPAC31G5.13	uch2	rpn11	-	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480020	2540956	2540875	277472	277392	SPBC409.06	SPBC577.10	uch2	pre4	-	SPBC577.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480021	2540956	2542062	277472	278540	SPBC409.06	SPAC22F8.06	uch2	pam1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480022	2540956	2540175	277472	276708	SPBC409.06	SPBC106.16	uch2	pre6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480023	2540956	2541805	277472	278296	SPBC409.06	SPAC23D3.07	uch2	pup1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480024	2540956	2543122	277472	279554	SPBC409.06	SPAC31A2.04c	uch2	pre1	-	SPAC31A2.04c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480025	2540956	2543682	277472	280096	SPBC409.06	SPAC637.10c	uch2	rpn10	-	pus1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480026	2540956	2539401	277472	275966	SPBC409.06	SPCC63.12c	uch2	pup3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480027	2540956	2542919	277472	279360	SPBC409.06	SPAC6C3.08	uch2	nas6	-	SPAC6C3.08	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480028	2540956	3361518	277472	280594	SPBC409.06	SPAC13C5.01c	uch2	pre9	-	SPAC13C5.01c|SPAC31A2.17c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480029	2540956	2539378	277472	275944	SPBC409.06	SPCC1795.04c	uch2	pre10	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480031	2542649	2542744	279103	279194	SPAC24C9.14	SPAC1565.08	otu1	cdc48	mug141	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480032	2543040	2540109	279475	276646	SPAC31G5.13	SPBC119.01	rpn11	rpn3	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	SPBPJ4664.07	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480033	2543040	2542907	279475	279351	SPAC31G5.13	SPAC1420.03	rpn11	rpn501	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	rpn5|rpn5-a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480034	2543040	2541807	279475	278298	SPAC31G5.13	SPAC23G3.11	rpn11	rpn6	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480035	2543040	2540794	279475	277313	SPAC31G5.13	SPBC582.07c	rpn11	rpn7	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480036	2543040	2540191	279475	276724	SPAC31G5.13	SPBC17D11.07c	rpn11	rpn2	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480037	2543040	2541268	279475	277782	SPAC31G5.13	SPBP19A11.03c	rpn11	mts4	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	rpn1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480038	2543040	2543114	279475	279546	SPAC31G5.13	SPAC607.05	rpn11	rpn9	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480039	2543040	2539189	279475	275760	SPAC31G5.13	SPCC1682.16	rpn11	rpt4	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	SPCC306.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480040	2543040	2540487	279475	277015	SPAC31G5.13	SPBC23G7.12c	rpn11	rpt6	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	let1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480041	2543040	2538912	279475	275489	SPAC31G5.13	SPCC1682.10	rpn11	rpn8	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480042	2543040	2539862	279475	276409	SPAC31G5.13	SPBC16C6.07c	rpn11	rpt1	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480043	2543040	3361462	279475	280538	SPAC31G5.13	SPAC3A11.12c	rpn11	rpt5	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	pam2|tbp1|SPAC3H5.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480044	2543040	2539539	279475	276101	SPAC31G5.13	SPCC576.10c	rpn11	rpt3	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480045	2543040	2540939	279475	277455	SPAC31G5.13	SPBC4.07c	rpn11	rpt2	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	mts2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480046	2543040	2540878	279475	277395	SPAC31G5.13	SPBC4C3.10c	rpn11	pre3	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480047	2543040	2541139	279475	277654	SPAC31G5.13	SPBC646.16	rpn11	scl1	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	SPBC646.16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480048	2543040	2543623	279475	280037	SPAC31G5.13	SPAC4A8.13c	rpn11	pts1	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480049	2543040	2543205	279475	279634	SPAC31G5.13	SPAC323.02c	rpn11	pup2	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480050	2543040	2540025	279475	276569	SPAC31G5.13	SPBC16G5.01	rpn11	rpn12	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	SPBC342.07|mts3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480051	2543040	2540175	279475	276708	SPAC31G5.13	SPBC106.16	rpn11	pre6	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480052	2543040	2539026	279475	275599	SPAC31G5.13	SPCC1442.06	rpn11	pre8	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480053	2543040	2542062	279475	278540	SPAC31G5.13	SPAC22F8.06	rpn11	pam1	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480054	2543040	2542559	279475	279015	SPAC31G5.13	SPAC6G10.04c	rpn11	pre5	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	SPAC6G10.04c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480055	2543040	2540875	279475	277392	SPAC31G5.13	SPBC577.10	rpn11	pre4	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	SPBC577.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480056	2543040	2541805	279475	278296	SPAC31G5.13	SPAC23D3.07	rpn11	pup1	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480057	2543040	3361518	279475	280594	SPAC31G5.13	SPAC13C5.01c	rpn11	pre9	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	SPAC13C5.01c|SPAC31A2.17c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480058	2543040	2543682	279475	280096	SPAC31G5.13	SPAC637.10c	rpn11	rpn10	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	pus1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480059	2543040	2540956	279475	277472	SPAC31G5.13	SPBC409.06	rpn11	uch2	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480060	2543040	2540980	279475	277496	SPAC31G5.13	SPBC342.04	rpn11	rpn1301	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	rpn13|rpn13a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480061	2543040	2539378	279475	275944	SPAC31G5.13	SPCC1795.04c	rpn11	pre10	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480062	2543040	2539182	279475	275753	SPAC31G5.13	SPCC16A11.16c	rpn11	rpn1302	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	rpn13|rpn13b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480063	2543040	2543122	279475	279554	SPAC31G5.13	SPAC31A2.04c	rpn11	pre1	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	SPAC31A2.04c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480064	2543040	2539401	279475	275966	SPAC31G5.13	SPCC63.12c	rpn11	pup3	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480065	2543040	3361455	279475	280531	SPAC31G5.13	SPAC1782.01	rpn11	ecm29	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	SPAPYUG7.07	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480066	2540837	2542091	277355	278568	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC7D4.02c	ubp4	sfp47	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480069	2540714	2543304	277237	279728	SPBC19C2.04c	SPAC6B12.12	ubp11	tom70	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480070	2539385	2542168	275950	278643	SPCC188.08c	SPAC17A5.16	ubp5	ftp105	ubp22	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480076	2542168	2539385	278643	275950	SPAC17A5.16	SPCC188.08c	ftp105	ubp5	-	ubp22	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480077	2540120	2542950	276657	279390	SPBC1703.12	SPAC12B10.03	ubp9	bun62	-	wdr20	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480078	2540120	2543160	276657	279591	SPBC1703.12	SPAC31A2.14	ubp9	bun107	-	wdr48	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480079	2542950	2540120	279390	276657	SPAC12B10.03	SPBC1703.12	bun62	ubp9	wdr20	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480080	2543160	2540120	279591	276657	SPAC31A2.14	SPBC1703.12	bun107	ubp9	wdr48	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480081	2540120	2543336	276657	279759	SPBC1703.12	SPAC688.11	ubp9	end4	-	sla2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
480082	2540120	2543589	276657	280004	SPBC1703.12	SPAC4F10.15c	ubp9	wsp1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
480083	2540120	2539659	276657	276214	SPBC1703.12	SPBC146.13c	ubp9	myo1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
480084	2540120	2539659	276657	276214	SPBC1703.12	SPBC146.13c	ubp9	myo1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|endocytosis|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
480085	2540120	2543589	276657	280004	SPBC1703.12	SPAC4F10.15c	ubp9	wsp1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kouranti I (2010)	20838651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
480102	2542632	2543298	279086	279723	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC6B12.15	cdc25	cpc2	sal2	rkp1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Nunez A (2010)	20974849	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
480103	2542632	2543298	279086	279723	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC6B12.15	cdc25	cpc2	sal2	rkp1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nunez A (2010)	20974849	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in G2 phase	-	-	BIOGRID
480215	2542703	2541620	279156	278117	SPAC26H5.06	SPAC2G11.12	pot1	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Takahashi K (2010)	21098121	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
480222	2542703	2541620	279156	278117	SPAC26H5.06	SPAC2G11.12	pot1	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Takahashi K (2010)	21098121	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|chromosome segregation|heat sensitivity|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Thiabendazole (TBZ)|pot1 null rqh1-K547A double mutant	-	BIOGRID
480230	2542703	2539087	279156	275659	SPAC26H5.06	SPCC1259.13	pot1	chk1	-	rad27	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Takahashi K (2010)	21098121	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:wild type	Elongation of pot1 null rqh1-K547A double mutant cells is suppressed by deletion of chk1+.	-	BIOGRID
480231	2541620	2539087	278117	275659	SPAC2G11.12	SPCC1259.13	rqh1	chk1	hus2|rad12|rec9	rad27	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Takahashi K (2010)	21098121	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:wild type	Elongation of pot1 null rqh1-K547A double mutant cells is suppressed by deletion of chk1+.	-	BIOGRID
480238	2542703	2541620	279156	278117	SPAC26H5.06	SPAC2G11.12	pot1	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Takahashi K (2010)	21098121	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	A pot1 null mutant loses both telomeric and telomere-associated sequence (TAS1).  A pot1 null rqh1-K547A double mutant can maintain some telomeric DNA.	-	BIOGRID
480251	2543193	3361134	279622	280210	SPAC3F10.11c	SPCC737.09c	abc2	hmt1	-	SPCC74.08c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Mendoza-Cozatl DG (2010)	20937798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|metal resistance	An abc2 hmt1 mutant shows increased sensitivity to cadmium.	-	BIOGRID
480254	3361134	3361562	280210	280638	SPCC737.09c	SPAC11E3.03	hmt1	csm1	SPCC74.08c	pcs1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Mendoza-Cozatl DG (2010)	20937798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|metal resistance	Cadmium	-	BIOGRID
480281	2542727	2542366	279177	278830	SPAC26A3.02	SPAC1783.04c	myh1	hst4	myh	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chang DY (2010)	21110984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480282	2542727	2542366	279177	278830	SPAC26A3.02	SPAC1783.04c	myh1	hst4	myh	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chang DY (2010)	21110984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
480287	2542207	2542696	278682	279149	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC29B12.03	ddb1	spd1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Moss J (2010)	21123655	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:wild type|chromosome/plasmid maintenance:wild type|radiation resistance:wild type|resistance to chemicals:wild type	Deletion of spd1 in a ddb1 pku70 double mutant repressed the increased cell size and sensitivity to bleomycin.	-	BIOGRID
480288	2542374	2542696	278838	279149	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC29B12.03	cdt2	spd1	sev1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Moss J (2010)	21123655	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:wild type|radiation resistance:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
480289	2542207	2539090	278682	275662	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC126.02c	ddb1	pku70	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Moss J (2010)	21123655	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size|resistance to chemicals	Bleomycin	-	BIOGRID
480293	2539090	2542696	275662	279149	SPCC126.02c	SPAC29B12.03	pku70	spd1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Moss J (2010)	21123655	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:wild type|resistance to chemicals:wild type	Deletion of spd1 in a ddb1 pku70 double mutant repressed the increased cell size and sensitivity to bleomycin.	-	BIOGRID
480295	2542207	2540348	278682	276877	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC29A10.05	ddb1	exo1	-	mut2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Moss J (2010)	21123655	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	Deletion of exo1 in a ddb1 pku70 double mutant partially rescued the increased cell size and sensitivity to bleomycin.	-	BIOGRID
480296	2539090	2540348	275662	276877	SPCC126.02c	SPBC29A10.05	pku70	exo1	-	mut2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Moss J (2010)	21123655	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	Deletion of exo1 in a ddb1 pku70 double mutant partially rescued the increased cell size and sensitivity to bleomycin.	-	BIOGRID
480299	2540719	2540719	277242	277242	SPBC216.05	SPBC216.05	rad3	rad3	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Moss J (2010)	21123655	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	MMS and bleomycin	-	BIOGRID
482455	2540051	2540051	276589	276589	SPBC32H8.12c	SPBC32H8.12c	act1	act1	cps8|pi012	cps8|pi012	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ti SC (2010)	21148484	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
482456	2540051	2541738	276589	278232	SPBC32H8.12c	SPAC20G4.06c	act1	adf1	cps8|pi012	cof1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ti SC (2010)	21148484	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
482457	2539971	2543290	276515	279715	SPBC1105.04c	SPAC9E9.10c	cbp1	cbh1	abp1	cbh	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Zaratiegui M (2010)	21151105	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	apoptosis|colony size|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
482458	2539971	2539285	276515	275853	SPBC1105.04c	SPCC1672.02c	cbp1	sap1	abp1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Zaratiegui M (2010)	21151105	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	apoptosis:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Deletion of Sap1 rescues an abp1 cbh1 double mutant.	-	BIOGRID
482459	2543290	2539285	279715	275853	SPAC9E9.10c	SPCC1672.02c	cbh1	sap1	cbh	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Zaratiegui M (2010)	21151105	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	apoptosis:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Deletion of Sap1 rescues an abp1 cbh1 double mutant.	-	BIOGRID
482592	2542366	2543633	278830	280047	SPAC1783.04c	SPAC3H8.05c	hst4	mms1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Vejrup-Hansen R (2010)	21183410	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	colony size:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
482593	2543633	2542207	280047	278682	SPAC3H8.05c	SPAC17H9.10c	mms1	ddb1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Vejrup-Hansen R (2010)	21183410	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
482595	2543633	2543116	280047	279548	SPAC3H8.05c	SPAC3A11.08	mms1	pcu4	-	Cul-4|cul4	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Vejrup-Hansen R (2010)	21183410	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Methyl Methanesulfonate (MMS) (CHEBI:25255 and PubChem CID:4156)|The mms1 pcu4 spd1 triple mutant showed greater sensitivity towards MMS.	-	BIOGRID
482596	2543633	2542696	280047	279149	SPAC3H8.05c	SPAC29B12.03	mms1	spd1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Vejrup-Hansen R (2010)	21183410	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Methyl Methanesulfonate (MMS) (CHEBI:25255 and PubChem CID:4156)|The mms1 pcu4 spd1 triple mutant showed greater sensitivity towards MMS.	-	BIOGRID
482600	2543633	2543565	280047	279981	SPAC3H8.05c	SPAPB24D3.04c	mms1	mag1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Vejrup-Hansen R (2010)	21183410	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Methyl Methanesulfonate (MMS) (CHEBI:25255 and PubChem CID:4156)	-	BIOGRID
482601	2543633	2543510	280047	279928	SPAC3H8.05c	SPAC30D11.07	mms1	nth1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Vejrup-Hansen R (2010)	21183410	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Methyl Methanesulfonate (MMS) (CHEBI:25255 and PubChem CID:4156)	-	BIOGRID
482603	2543633	2540679	280047	277204	SPAC3H8.05c	SPBC3D6.10	mms1	apn2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Vejrup-Hansen R (2010)	21183410	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|resistance to chemicals	Methyl Methanesulfonate (MMS) (CHEBI:25255 and PubChem CID:4156)	-	BIOGRID
482605	2543633	2540020	280047	276564	SPAC3H8.05c	SPBC16D10.09	mms1	pcn1	-	pcn	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Vejrup-Hansen R (2010)	21183410	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	mms1 pcn1-K164R double mutant	-	BIOGRID
482606	2543633	2542925	280047	279366	SPAC3H8.05c	SPAC11E3.04c	mms1	ubc13	-	spu13|sst5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Vejrup-Hansen R (2010)	21183410	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
482620	2543633	2541051	280047	277566	SPAC3H8.05c	SPBC3E7.08c	mms1	rad13	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Vejrup-Hansen R (2010)	21183410	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
482624	2543633	2540728	280047	277251	SPAC3H8.05c	SPBC216.06c	mms1	swi1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Vejrup-Hansen R (2010)	21183410	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Methyl Methanesulfonate (MMS) (CHEBI:25255 and PubChem CID:4156)	-	BIOGRID
482626	2539004	2540728	275578	277251	SPCC4G3.05c	SPBC216.06c	mus81	swi1	slx3	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Vejrup-Hansen R (2010)	21183410	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|resistance to chemicals	Methyl Methanesulfonate (MMS) (CHEBI:25255 and PubChem CID:4156)	-	BIOGRID
482629	2543633	2543086	280047	279519	SPAC3H8.05c	SPAC30D11.10	mms1	rad52	-	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Vejrup-Hansen R (2010)	21183410	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|resistance to chemicals	Methyl Methanesulfonate (MMS) (CHEBI:25255 and PubChem CID:4156)	-	BIOGRID
482630	2543633	2543580	280047	279995	SPAC3H8.05c	SPAC644.14c	mms1	rad51	-	rhp51	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Vejrup-Hansen R (2010)	21183410	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|resistance to chemicals	Methyl Methanesulfonate (MMS) (CHEBI:25255 and PubChem CID:4156)	-	BIOGRID
482632	2543633	2540244	280047	276776	SPAC3H8.05c	SPBC336.01	mms1	fbh1	-	fdh|fdh1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Vejrup-Hansen R (2010)	21183410	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Methyl Methanesulfonate (MMS) (CHEBI:25255 and PubChem CID:4156)	-	BIOGRID
482633	2543633	2543164	280047	279595	SPAC3H8.05c	SPAC3G6.06c	mms1	rad2	-	fen1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Vejrup-Hansen R (2010)	21183410	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|resistance to chemicals	Methyl Methanesulfonate (MMS) (CHEBI:25255 and PubChem CID:4156)	-	BIOGRID
482634	2543633	2542007	280047	278490	SPAC3H8.05c	SPAC20H4.07	mms1	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Vejrup-Hansen R (2010)	21183410	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|resistance to chemicals	Methyl Methanesulfonate (MMS) (CHEBI:25255 and PubChem CID:4156)	-	BIOGRID
482635	2543633	2540584	280047	277110	SPAC3H8.05c	SPBC28F2.07	mms1	sfr1	-	dds20|mug13	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Vejrup-Hansen R (2010)	21183410	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Methyl Methanesulfonate (MMS) (CHEBI:25255 and PubChem CID:4156)	-	BIOGRID
482888	2543372	2543360	279794	279782	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC664.10	ase1	klp2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Roque H (2010)	21151990	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytoskeleton morphology	double mutants show increased defects in microtubule bundling	-	BIOGRID
482889	2543372	2539505	279794	276068	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC736.14	ase1	dis1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Roque H (2010)	21151990	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
482890	2543372	2539505	279794	276068	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC736.14	ase1	dis1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Roque H (2010)	21151990	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell wall morphology	double mutants show severe defects in microtubule bundling	-	BIOGRID
482891	2543372	2539505	279794	276068	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC736.14	ase1	dis1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Roque H (2010)	21151990	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell wall morphology:wild type	overexpression of DIS1 rescues microtubule defects in an ase1 backgorund	-	BIOGRID
482896	2539487	2539407	276050	275972	SPCC895.05	SPCC970.09	for3	sec8	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bendezu FO (2010)	21148300	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	addition of a GFP tag to sec8 causes severe morphology defects in a for3 or myo52 background|deletion and depletion of sec8 also causes aberrant morphology in a for3 or myo52 mutant background	-	BIOGRID
482897	2538846	2539407	275427	275972	SPCC1919.10c	SPCC970.09	myo52	sec8	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bendezu FO (2010)	21148300	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	addition of a GFP tag to sec8 causes severe morphology defects in a for3 or myo52 background|deletion and depletion of sec8 also causes aberrant morphology in a for3 or myo52 mutant background	-	BIOGRID
482901	2539487	2539407	276050	275972	SPCC895.05	SPCC970.09	for3	sec8	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bendezu FO (2010)	21148300	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
482902	2538846	2539407	275427	275972	SPCC1919.10c	SPCC970.09	myo52	sec8	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bendezu FO (2010)	21148300	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
482903	2539487	2540127	276050	276664	SPCC895.05	SPBC106.20	for3	exo70	-	SPBC582.02	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bendezu FO (2010)	21148300	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
482904	2538846	2540127	275427	276664	SPCC1919.10c	SPBC106.20	myo52	exo70	-	SPBC582.02	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bendezu FO (2010)	21148300	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
482905	2538846	2540127	275427	276664	SPCC1919.10c	SPBC106.20	myo52	exo70	-	SPBC582.02	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bendezu FO (2010)	21148300	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	deletion of exo70 causes aberrant morphology in a for3 or myo52 mutant background	-	BIOGRID
482906	2539487	2540127	276050	276664	SPCC895.05	SPBC106.20	for3	exo70	-	SPBC582.02	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bendezu FO (2010)	21148300	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	deletion of exo70 causes aberrant morphology in a for3 or myo52 mutant background	-	BIOGRID
482907	2543526	2539407	279944	275972	SPAC4A8.15c	SPCC970.09	cdc3	sec8	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bendezu FO (2010)	21148300	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	deletion of sec8 causes aberrant morphology in a cdc3 mutant background	-	BIOGRID
482908	2542231	2539407	278704	275972	SPAC19G12.14	SPCC970.09	its3	sec8	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bendezu FO (2010)	21148300	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
482909	2542231	2539487	278704	276050	SPAC19G12.14	SPCC895.05	its3	for3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bendezu FO (2010)	21148300	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
482938	2542657	2541633	279111	278129	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC664.01c	mis4	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Dheur S (2010)	21189291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:wild type	mutation of swi6 or rad21 abrogates the effect of mis4 mutation on subtelomeric DNA transcription	-	BIOGRID
482939	2542657	2539447	279111	276010	SPAC31A2.05c	SPCC338.17c	mis4	rad21	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Dheur S (2010)	21189291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:wild type	mutation of swi6 or rad21 abrogates the effect of mis4 mutation on subtelomeric DNA transcription	-	BIOGRID
482942	2543086	2540244	279519	276776	SPAC30D11.10	SPBC336.01	rad52	fbh1	rad22|rad22A	fdh|fdh1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sun W (2010)	21149262	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
482943	2540244	2542150	276776	278626	SPBC336.01	SPAC17A5.11	fbh1	rec12	fdh|fdh1	spo11	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sun W (2010)	21149262	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation efficiency:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	deletion of rec12 partially alleviates the poor spore viability of an fbh1 null mutant	-	BIOGRID
482944	2540244	2543580	276776	279995	SPBC336.01	SPAC644.14c	fbh1	rad51	fdh|fdh1	rhp51	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sun W (2010)	21149262	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation efficiency:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	deletion of rad51 partially alleviates the poor spore viability of an fbh1 null mutant	-	BIOGRID
482945	2543086	2540121	279519	276658	SPAC30D11.10	SPBC119.14	rad52	rti1	rad22|rad22A	rad22B	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sun W (2010)	21149262	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|sporulation efficiency	double mutants show decreased spore viability	-	BIOGRID
482946	2540244	2540121	276776	276658	SPBC336.01	SPBC119.14	fbh1	rti1	fdh|fdh1	rad22B	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sun W (2010)	21149262	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation efficiency:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	deletion of rti1 and rad22 causes a synthetic increase on spore viability in an fbh1 null mutant|deletion of rti1 or rad22 increases spore viability  and restores RAD51 foci levels in an fbh1 mutant background|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
482947	2540244	2543086	276776	279519	SPBC336.01	SPAC30D11.10	fbh1	rad52	fdh|fdh1	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sun W (2010)	21149262	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation efficiency:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	deletion of rti1 and rad22 causes a synthetic increase on spore viability in an fbh1 null mutant|deletion of rti1 or rad22 increases spore viability  and restores RAD51 foci levels in an fbh1 mutant background|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
482949	2538830	2541801	275411	278292	SPCC1393.13	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC1393.13	snf5	prl64|SPNCRNA.64	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Henry TC (2010)	21169418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient utilization:wild type	deletion of snf5 suppresses the phosphate starvation phenotype	-	BIOGRID
482950	2543327	2541801	279750	278292	SPAC1D4.06c	SPAC2F7.08c	csk1	snf5	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Henry TC (2010)	21169418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient utilization:wild type	deletion of snf5 suppresses the phosphate starvation phenotype	-	BIOGRID
482951	2542890	2541801	279334	278292	SPAC13G6.14	SPAC2F7.08c	aps1	snf5	SPAC24B11.03	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Henry TC (2010)	21169418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient utilization:wild type	deletion of snf5 suppresses the phosphate starvation phenotype	-	BIOGRID
482952	2538830	2540501	275411	277029	SPCC1393.13	SPBC27B12.11c	SPCC1393.13	pho7	prl64|SPNCRNA.64	SPBC27B12.11c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Henry TC (2010)	21169418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient utilization:wild type	deletion of pho7 suppresses the phosphate starvation phenotype	-	BIOGRID
482953	2543327	2540501	279750	277029	SPAC1D4.06c	SPBC27B12.11c	csk1	pho7	-	SPBC27B12.11c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Henry TC (2010)	21169418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient utilization:wild type	deletion of pho7 suppresses the phosphate starvation phenotype	-	BIOGRID
482954	2541140	2540501	277655	277029	SPBC713.07c	SPBC27B12.11c	SPBC713.07c	pho7	-	SPBC27B12.11c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Henry TC (2010)	21169418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient utilization:wild type	deletion of pho7 suppresses the phosphate starvation phenotype|deletion of the hit gene suppresses the phosphate starvation phenotype of spbc713.07c	-	BIOGRID
482955	2542890	2540501	279334	277029	SPAC13G6.14	SPBC27B12.11c	aps1	pho7	SPAC24B11.03	SPBC27B12.11c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Henry TC (2010)	21169418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient utilization:wild type	deletion of pho7 suppresses the phosphate starvation phenotype	-	BIOGRID
482956	2541140	2541801	277655	278292	SPBC713.07c	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC713.07c	snf5	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Henry TC (2010)	21169418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient utilization:wild type	deletion of snf5 suppresses the phosphate starvation phenotype|deletion of the hit gene suppresses the phosphate starvation phenotype of spbc713.07c	-	BIOGRID
482957	2541140	2539781	277655	276331	SPBC713.07c	SPBC106.10	SPBC713.07c	pka1	-	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Henry TC (2010)	21169418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient utilization:wild type	deletion of the hit gene suppresses the phosphate starvation phenotype of spbc713.07c	-	BIOGRID
482958	2541140	2541694	277655	278190	SPBC713.07c	SPAC1071.04c	SPBC713.07c	spc2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Henry TC (2010)	21169418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient utilization:wild type	deletion of the hit gene suppresses the phosphate starvation phenotype of spbc713.07c	-	BIOGRID
482959	2541140	2542836	277655	279282	SPBC713.07c	SPAC13G7.06	SPBC713.07c	met16	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Henry TC (2010)	21169418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient utilization:wild type	deletion of the hit gene suppresses the phosphate starvation phenotype of spbc713.07c	-	BIOGRID
482960	2541140	2541720	277655	278214	SPBC713.07c	SPAC23H3.13c	SPBC713.07c	gpa2	-	git8	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Henry TC (2010)	21169418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient utilization:wild type	deletion of the hit gene suppresses the phosphate starvation phenotype of spbc713.07c	-	BIOGRID
482961	2541140	2539291	277655	275859	SPBC713.07c	SPCC757.10	SPBC713.07c	vph2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Henry TC (2010)	21169418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient utilization:wild type	deletion of the hit gene suppresses the phosphate starvation phenotype of spbc713.07c	-	BIOGRID
482962	2541140	2541018	277655	277533	SPBC713.07c	SPBC3B9.11c	SPBC713.07c	ctf1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Henry TC (2010)	21169418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient utilization:wild type	deletion of the hit gene suppresses the phosphate starvation phenotype of spbc713.07c	-	BIOGRID
482963	2541140	2543529	277655	279947	SPBC713.07c	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC713.07c	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Henry TC (2010)	21169418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient utilization:wild type	deletion of the hit gene suppresses the phosphate starvation phenotype of spbc713.07c	-	BIOGRID
482964	2541140	2543619	277655	280033	SPBC713.07c	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC713.07c	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Henry TC (2010)	21169418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient utilization:wild type	deletion of the hit gene suppresses the phosphate starvation phenotype of spbc713.07c	-	BIOGRID
482965	2541140	2542253	277655	278723	SPBC713.07c	SPAC17H9.04c	SPBC713.07c	SPAC17H9.04c	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Henry TC (2010)	21169418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient utilization:wild type	deletion of the hit gene suppresses the phosphate starvation phenotype of spbc713.07c	-	BIOGRID
483362	2540735	2539050	277258	275623	SPBC83.03c	SPCC11E10.08	tas3	rik1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Shanker S (2010)	21060862	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation|protein/peptide modification|silencing	loss of rik1 in a tas3 depleted background results in a loss of centromeric heterochromatin silencing, histone 3 methylation and CHP1 association with the DNA	-	BIOGRID
483363	2540735	2538848	277258	275429	SPBC83.03c	SPCC613.12c	tas3	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Shanker S (2010)	21060862	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation|protein/peptide modification|silencing	loss of raf1 in a tas3 depleted background results in a loss of centromeric heterochromatin silencing, histone 3 methylation and CHP1 association with the DNA	-	BIOGRID
483364	2540735	2539420	277258	275985	SPBC83.03c	SPCC970.07c	tas3	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Shanker S (2010)	21060862	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation|protein/peptide modification|silencing	loss of raf2 in a tas3 depleted background results in a loss of centromeric heterochromatin silencing, histone 3 methylation and CHP1 association with the DNA	-	BIOGRID
483365	2540735	2543116	277258	279548	SPBC83.03c	SPAC3A11.08	tas3	pcu4	-	Cul-4|cul4	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Shanker S (2010)	21060862	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation|protein/peptide modification|silencing	loss of pcu4 in a tas3 depleted background results in a loss of centromeric heterochromatin silencing|loss of pcu4 in a tas3 depleted background results in a loss of centromeric heterochromatin silencing, histone 3 methylation and CHP1 association with the DNA	-	BIOGRID
483675	2542467	2541633	278928	278129	SPAC1834.04	SPAC664.01c	hht1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Canzio D (2011)	21211724	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
483676	2541220	2541633	277734	278129	SPBC8D2.04	SPAC664.01c	hht2	swi6	h3.2	SPAC824.10c	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Canzio D (2011)	21211724	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
483677	2539804	2541633	276354	278129	SPBC1105.11c	SPAC664.01c	hht3	swi6	h3.3	SPAC824.10c	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Canzio D (2011)	21211724	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
483678	2541633	2541633	278129	278129	SPAC664.01c	SPAC664.01c	swi6	swi6	SPAC824.10c	SPAC824.10c	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Canzio D (2011)	21211724	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
483682	2540511	2543481	277039	279901	SPBC1718.01	SPAPB2B4.03	pop1	cig2	SPBC2G2.18|ste16	cyc17	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Yamano H (2004)	14970237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
483683	2540511	2540013	277039	276557	SPBC1718.01	SPBC14C8.07c	pop1	cdc18	SPBC2G2.18|ste16	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Yamano H (2004)	14970237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
483684	2540511	2539640	277039	276195	SPBC1718.01	SPBC32F12.09	pop1	rum1	SPBC2G2.18|ste16	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Yamano H (2004)	14970237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
484164	2539123	2540361	275695	276890	SPCC18B5.03	SPBC2F12.13	wee1	klp5	-	sot1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	West RR (2001)	11739790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size|cytoskeleton morphology	genetic complex|wee1/klp5/klp6 triple mutants show size abnormalities related to microtubule formation	-	BIOGRID
484165	2539123	2539700	275695	276253	SPCC18B5.03	SPBC1685.15c	wee1	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	West RR (2001)	11739790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size|cytoskeleton morphology	genetic complex|wee1/klp5/klp6 triple mutants show size abnormalities related to microtubule formation	-	BIOGRID
486344	2541656	2540554	278152	277081	SPAC25H1.06	SPBC29A10.03c	pcf3	pcf1	-	SPBC365.19c|rlf2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yamane K (2011)	21211723	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
486345	2541656	2542071	278152	278548	SPAC25H1.06	SPAC26H5.03	pcf3	pcf2	-	cac2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yamane K (2011)	21211723	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
486346	2541656	2540020	278152	276564	SPAC25H1.06	SPBC16D10.09	pcf3	pcn1	-	pcn	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yamane K (2011)	21211723	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
486347	2541633	2540227	278129	276759	SPAC664.01c	SPBC31F10.14c	swi6	hip3	SPAC824.10c	hir3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yamane K (2011)	21211723	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
486348	2541858	2540219	278348	276752	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC31F10.13c	alp13	hip1	-	hir1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yamane K (2011)	21211723	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
486352	2541633	2540219	278129	276752	SPAC664.01c	SPBC31F10.13c	swi6	hip1	SPAC824.10c	hir1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yamane K (2011)	21211723	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
486353	2539568	2540219	276128	276752	SPCC663.05c	SPBC31F10.13c	cia1	hip1	asf1	hir1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yamane K (2011)	21211723	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
486354	2539568	2540227	276128	276759	SPCC663.05c	SPBC31F10.14c	cia1	hip3	asf1	hir3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yamane K (2011)	21211723	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
486355	2539568	2542467	276128	278928	SPCC663.05c	SPAC1834.04	cia1	hht1	asf1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yamane K (2011)	21211723	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
486356	2539568	2541220	276128	277734	SPCC663.05c	SPBC8D2.04	cia1	hht2	asf1	h3.2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yamane K (2011)	21211723	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
486357	2539568	2542463	276128	278924	SPCC663.05c	SPAC1834.03c	cia1	hhf1	asf1	h4.1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yamane K (2011)	21211723	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
486358	2539568	2541200	276128	277714	SPCC663.05c	SPBC8D2.03c	cia1	hhf2	asf1	ams3|h4.2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yamane K (2011)	21211723	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
486359	2539568	2540128	276128	276665	SPCC663.05c	SPBC15D4.03	cia1	slm9	asf1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yamane K (2011)	21211723	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
486360	2539568	2541284	276128	277797	SPCC663.05c	SPBC947.08c	cia1	hip4	asf1	hpc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Yamane K (2011)	21211723	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
486361	2539568	2541858	276128	278348	SPCC663.05c	SPAC23H4.12	cia1	alp13	asf1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yamane K (2011)	21211723	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	double mutants show increased levels of heterochromatin	-	BIOGRID
486362	2540735	2539568	277258	276128	SPBC83.03c	SPCC663.05c	tas3	cia1	-	asf1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yamane K (2011)	21211723	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	double mutants show increased levels of heterochromatin	-	BIOGRID
486363	2540735	2540219	277258	276752	SPBC83.03c	SPBC31F10.13c	tas3	hip1	-	hir1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yamane K (2011)	21211723	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	double mutants show increased levels of heterochromatin	-	BIOGRID
486364	2540821	2539568	277339	276128	SPBC800.03	SPCC663.05c	clr3	cia1	-	asf1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yamane K (2011)	21211723	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	double mutants show increased levels of heterochromatin	-	BIOGRID
486365	2540821	2540219	277339	276752	SPBC800.03	SPBC31F10.13c	clr3	hip1	-	hir1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yamane K (2011)	21211723	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	double mutants show increased levels of heterochromatin	-	BIOGRID
486366	2541336	2539568	277847	276128	SPBP35G2.10	SPCC663.05c	mit1	cia1	-	asf1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yamane K (2011)	21211723	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	double mutants show increased levels of heterochromatin	-	BIOGRID
486367	2541336	2540219	277847	276752	SPBP35G2.10	SPBC31F10.13c	mit1	hip1	-	hir1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yamane K (2011)	21211723	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	double mutants show increased levels of heterochromatin	-	BIOGRID
486690	2541633	2541633	278129	278129	SPAC664.01c	SPAC664.01c	swi6	swi6	SPAC824.10c	SPAC824.10c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Haldar S (2011)	21224386	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
486691	2541633	2540825	278129	277343	SPAC664.01c	SPBC428.08c	swi6	clr4	SPAC824.10c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Haldar S (2011)	21224386	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
486692	2540825	2541633	277343	278129	SPBC428.08c	SPAC664.01c	clr4	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Haldar S (2011)	21224386	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
486693	2541455	2539123	277958	275695	SPAC6G9.06c	SPCC18B5.03	pcp1	wee1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Masuda H (2011)	21233285	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
487308	2542374	2539481	278838	276044	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC622.16c	cdt2	epe1	sev1	kdm2	Two-hybrid	physical	Braun S (2011)	21215368	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
487309	2541633	2539481	278129	276044	SPAC664.01c	SPCC622.16c	swi6	epe1	SPAC824.10c	kdm2	Two-hybrid	physical	Braun S (2011)	21215368	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
487325	2539481	2542374	276044	278838	SPCC622.16c	SPAC17H9.19c	epe1	cdt2	kdm2	sev1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Braun S (2011)	21215368	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
487328	2542207	2539481	278682	276044	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC622.16c	ddb1	epe1	-	kdm2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Braun S (2011)	21215368	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	The ddb1 spd1 double mutant silencing defect was suppressed by deletion of epe1.	-	BIOGRID
487329	2542696	2539481	279149	276044	SPAC29B12.03	SPCC622.16c	spd1	epe1	-	kdm2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Braun S (2011)	21215368	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	The ddb1 spd1 double mutant silencing defect was suppressed by deletion of epe1.	-	BIOGRID
487353	2541619	2543278	278116	279706	SPAC27F1.09c	SPAPJ698.03c	prp10	prp12	sap155|SF3b155	sap130|SF3b130	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Habara Y (2001)	11350031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
487354	2540115	2542313	276652	278779	SPBC1778.02	SPAC16A10.07c	rap1	taz1	-	myb|myb1	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Chen Y (2011)	21217703	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	NMR structure	-	BIOGRID
487355	2540115	2542313	276652	278779	SPBC1778.02	SPAC16A10.07c	rap1	taz1	-	myb|myb1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chen Y (2011)	21217703	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
487356	2542313	2540115	278779	276652	SPAC16A10.07c	SPBC1778.02	taz1	rap1	myb|myb1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Chen Y (2011)	21217703	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
487357	2542313	2540115	278779	276652	SPAC16A10.07c	SPBC1778.02	taz1	rap1	myb|myb1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Chen Y (2011)	21217703	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	-	-	BIOGRID
502934	2540593	2539487	277119	276050	SPBC28E12.03	SPCC895.05	rga4	for3	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Das M (2007)	17377067	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology:wild type	deletion  of for3 blocks the actin cable formation seen in an rga4 mutant	-	BIOGRID
510941	2541756	2542041	278250	278522	SPAC8C9.14	SPAC27E2.09	prr1	mak2	-	phk1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buck V (2001)	11179424	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	oxidative stress resistance|vegetative growth	deletion of mak2/mak3 increases sensitivity to peroxide in a prr1 background|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
510942	2541756	2539117	278250	275689	SPAC8C9.14	SPCC74.06	prr1	mak3	-	phk2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buck V (2001)	11179424	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	oxidative stress resistance|vegetative growth	deletion of mak2/mak3 increases sensitivity to peroxide in a prr1 background|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
510943	2541756	2540329	278250	276859	SPAC8C9.14	SPBC29B5.01	prr1	atf1	-	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buck V (2001)	11179424	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	oxidative stress resistance|vegetative growth	deletion of atf1 increases sensitivity to peroxide in a prr1 background|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
510944	2541612	2539707	278109	276260	SPAC1F7.04	SPBC17F3.01c	rho1	rga5	-	SPBC557.01	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Calonge TM (2003)	12519200	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
510945	2542293	2539707	278761	276260	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC17F3.01c	pck1	rga5	SPAC22H10.01c	SPBC557.01	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Calonge TM (2003)	12519200	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
510952	2539437	2540856	276000	277373	SPCC645.06c	SPBC4F6.12	rgf3	pxl1	lad1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Pinar M (2008)	18256290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
510957	2540856	2539205	277373	275775	SPBC4F6.12	SPCC4B3.15	pxl1	mid1	-	dmf1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pinar M (2008)	18256290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
510958	2540856	2543545	277373	279962	SPBC4F6.12	SPAC926.03	pxl1	rlc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pinar M (2008)	18256290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
510984	2540911	2541587	277427	278084	SPBC651.10	SPAC14C4.02c	nse5	smc5	-	spr18	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	High Throughput|Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
510985	2540911	2539020	277427	275593	SPBC651.10	SPCC5E4.06	nse5	smc6	-	rad18	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	High Throughput|Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
510986	2540911	2539550	277427	276111	SPBC651.10	SPCC550.05	nse5	nse1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	High Throughput|Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
510987	2540911	2542312	277427	278778	SPBC651.10	SPAC16A10.06c	nse5	nse2	-	pli2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	High Throughput|Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
510988	2540911	2539436	277427	275999	SPBC651.10	SPCC645.04	nse5	nse3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	High Throughput|Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
510989	2540911	2541512	277427	278013	SPBC651.10	SPAC11E3.08c	nse5	nse6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	High Throughput|Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
510990	2541512	2541587	278013	278084	SPAC11E3.08c	SPAC14C4.02c	nse6	smc5	-	spr18	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	High Throughput|Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
510991	2541512	2539020	278013	275593	SPAC11E3.08c	SPCC5E4.06	nse6	smc6	-	rad18	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	High Throughput|Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
510992	2541512	2539550	278013	276111	SPAC11E3.08c	SPCC550.05	nse6	nse1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	High Throughput|Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
510993	2541512	2542312	278013	278778	SPAC11E3.08c	SPAC16A10.06c	nse6	nse2	-	pli2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	High Throughput|Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
510994	2541512	2539436	278013	275999	SPAC11E3.08c	SPCC645.04	nse6	nse3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	High Throughput|Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
510995	2541512	2540911	278013	277427	SPAC11E3.08c	SPBC651.10	nse6	nse5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	High Throughput|Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
510996	2541512	2543580	278013	279995	SPAC11E3.08c	SPAC644.14c	nse6	rad51	-	rhp51	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
510997	2542312	2543580	278778	279995	SPAC16A10.06c	SPAC644.14c	nse2	rad51	pli2	rhp51	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
510998	2541512	2542312	278013	278778	SPAC11E3.08c	SPAC16A10.06c	nse6	nse2	-	pli2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
510999	2541512	2539436	278013	275999	SPAC11E3.08c	SPCC645.04	nse6	nse3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
511000	2541512	2539004	278013	275578	SPAC11E3.08c	SPCC4G3.05c	nse6	mus81	-	slx3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
511001	2541512	2541620	278013	278117	SPAC11E3.08c	SPAC2G11.12	nse6	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
511002	2541512	2540802	278013	277321	SPAC11E3.08c	SPBC1921.02	nse6	rad60	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
511003	2541512	2540719	278013	277242	SPAC11E3.08c	SPBC216.05	nse6	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
511004	2541512	2539087	278013	275659	SPAC11E3.08c	SPCC1259.13	nse6	chk1	-	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
511005	2541512	2543685	278013	280099	SPAC11E3.08c	SPAC3C7.03c	nse6	rad55	-	rhp55	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
511006	2541512	2540574	278013	277101	SPAC11E3.08c	SPBC409.03	nse6	swi5	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
511007	2541512	2543685	278013	280099	SPAC11E3.08c	SPAC3C7.03c	nse6	rad55	-	rhp55	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
511008	2541512	2540345	278013	276874	SPAC11E3.08c	SPBC19C7.09c	nse6	uve1	-	uvde	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
511009	2541512	2541051	278013	277566	SPAC11E3.08c	SPBC3E7.08c	nse6	rad13	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
511010	2541512	2539686	278013	276241	SPAC11E3.08c	SPBC1734.06	nse6	rhp18	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pebernard S (2006)	16478984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
511101	2539767	2540917	276318	277433	SPBC1703.06	SPBC409.05	pof10	skp1	-	psh1|sph1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ikebe C (2002)	11820777	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	overexpression of Skp1 rescues growth in a pof10 overexpression mutant	-	BIOGRID
511117	2540936	2542123	277452	278599	SPBC800.05c	SPAC18G6.15	atb2	mal3	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Asakawa K (2006)	16394105	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
511216	2543577	2539966	279992	276510	SPAC4H3.05	SPBC11B10.06	srs2	sws1	-	pi005|SPACTOKYO_453.32	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Martin V (2006)	16710300	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	double mutants show decreased sensitivity to HU	-	BIOGRID
511221	2541620	2539966	278117	276510	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC11B10.06	rqh1	sws1	hus2|rad12|rec9	pi005|SPACTOKYO_453.32	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Martin V (2006)	16710300	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
511222	2541620	2542295	278117	278763	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC17H9.03c	rqh1	rdl1	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Martin V (2006)	16710300	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance:partial rescue	double mutants show decreased sensitivity to radiation	-	BIOGRID
511578	2543254	2539540	279682	276102	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC736.12c	red1	mmi1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sugiyama T (2011)	21317872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
511579	2539540	2543254	276102	279682	SPCC736.12c	SPAC1006.03c	mmi1	red1	-	iss3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sugiyama T (2011)	21317872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
511580	2541099	2543254	277614	279682	SPBC646.04	SPAC1006.03c	pla1	red1	-	iss3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sugiyama T (2011)	21317872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
511581	2543630	2543254	280044	279682	SPAC1F3.01	SPAC1006.03c	rrp6	red1	SPAC3H8.11	iss3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sugiyama T (2011)	21317872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
511582	2543254	2540241	279682	276773	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC32H8.11	red1	mei4	iss3	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Sugiyama T (2011)	21317872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
511583	2543254	2540712	279682	277235	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC216.02	red1	mcp5	iss3	mug21|num1	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Sugiyama T (2011)	21317872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
511584	2543254	2540458	279682	276986	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC29A10.14	red1	rec8	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Sugiyama T (2011)	21317872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
511609	2541306	3361511	277818	280587	SPBP16F5.07	SPAC23C4.08	apm1	rho3	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kita A (2011)	21304827	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|protein transport:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	overexpression of rho3 rescues temperatature and Cl sensitivity of an apm1 mutant|rho3 also supresses membrane trafficking defects in an apm1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
511610	2541306	3361511	277818	280587	SPBP16F5.07	SPAC23C4.08	apm1	rho3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kita A (2011)	21304827	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
511612	2541255	3361511	277769	280587	SPBC947.02	SPAC23C4.08	apl2	rho3	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kita A (2011)	21304827	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	overexpression of rho3 rescues sensitivity to heat and FK506	-	BIOGRID
511613	2539311	3361511	275878	280587	SPCP1E11.06	SPAC23C4.08	apl4	rho3	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kita A (2011)	21304827	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	overexpression of rho3 rescues sensitivity to heat and FK506	-	BIOGRID
511615	2541255	3361511	277769	280587	SPBC947.02	SPAC23C4.08	apl2	rho3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kita A (2011)	21304827	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
511616	2539311	3361511	275878	280587	SPCP1E11.06	SPAC23C4.08	apl4	rho3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kita A (2011)	21304827	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
511617	2540309	2540234	276839	276766	SPBC21B10.13c	SPBC336.12c	yox1	cdc10	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Purtill FS (2011)	21304269	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
511618	2540719	2540309	277242	276839	SPBC216.05	SPBC21B10.13c	rad3	yox1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Purtill FS (2011)	21304269	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	double mutants show decreased sensitivity to HU compared to a rad3 single mutant	-	BIOGRID
511619	2539568	2539900	276128	276446	SPCC663.05c	SPBC17D11.02c	cia1	hrd1	asf1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Matsuo Y (2011)	21324894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
511620	2539568	2539855	276128	276403	SPCC663.05c	SPBC14F5.07	cia1	doa10	asf1	ssm4	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Matsuo Y (2011)	21324894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
511621	2539568	2540480	276128	277008	SPCC663.05c	SPBC2A9.04c	cia1	san1	asf1	SPBC2A9.04c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Matsuo Y (2011)	21324894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
511622	2539568	2540480	276128	277008	SPCC663.05c	SPBC2A9.04c	cia1	san1	asf1	SPBC2A9.04c	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Matsuo Y (2011)	21324894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	overexpression of san1 increases temperature sensitivity in an asf1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
511623	2540494	2540480	277022	277008	SPBC409.04c	SPBC2A9.04c	mis12	san1	-	SPBC2A9.04c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Matsuo Y (2011)	21324894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
511624	2539658	2540480	276213	277008	SPBC1105.17	SPBC2A9.04c	cnp1	san1	sim2	SPBC2A9.04c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Matsuo Y (2011)	21324894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
511625	2541059	2540480	277574	277008	SPBC557.03c	SPBC2A9.04c	pim1	san1	dcd1|ptr2	SPBC2A9.04c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Matsuo Y (2011)	21324894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
511627	2540821	2540368	277339	276897	SPBC800.03	SPBC36.05c	clr3	clr6	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hansen KR (2011)	21253571	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating type switching	deletion of both genes leads to full derepression of mat2-P	-	BIOGRID
511628	2540821	2542669	277339	279122	SPBC800.03	SPAC29B12.08	clr3	clr5	-	SPAC29B12.08	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hansen KR (2011)	21253571	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating type switching	deletion of both genes leads to full derepression of mat2-P	-	BIOGRID
511629	2540825	2542669	277343	279122	SPBC428.08c	SPAC29B12.08	clr4	clr5	-	SPAC29B12.08	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hansen KR (2011)	21253571	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating type switching	deletion of both genes leads to full derepression of mat2-P	-	BIOGRID
511630	2541633	2542669	278129	279122	SPAC664.01c	SPAC29B12.08	swi6	clr5	SPAC824.10c	SPAC29B12.08	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hansen KR (2011)	21253571	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating type switching	deletion of both genes leads to full derepression of mat2-P	-	BIOGRID
511631	2540097	2539505	276635	276068	SPBC11C11.03	SPCC736.14	ndc80	dis1	ndc10|tid3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hsu KS (2011)	21256022	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
511632	2540097	2539505	276635	276068	SPBC11C11.03	SPCC736.14	ndc80	dis1	ndc10|tid3	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Hsu KS (2011)	21256022	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	creation of a dis1-nuf2 chimera tethers dis1 to ndc80, rescuing some of the growth defects resulting from mutation of ndc80	-	BIOGRID
511660	856241	2538731	36292	275315	YPR124W	SPCC1393.10	CTR1	ctr4	L000003063	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Beaudoin J (2011)	21273250	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	Overexpression of CTR4 and CTR5 rescues growth in a ctr1/ctr3 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
511661	856241	2542949	36292	279389	YPR124W	SPAC1142.05	CTR1	ctr5	L000003063	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Beaudoin J (2011)	21273250	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	Overexpression of CTR4 and CTR5 rescues growth in a ctr1/ctr3 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
511662	851129	2538731	31670	275315	YLR411W	SPCC1393.10	CTR3	ctr4	L000003441	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Beaudoin J (2011)	21273250	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	Overexpression of CTR4 and CTR5 rescues growth in a ctr1/ctr3 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
511663	851129	2542949	31670	279389	YLR411W	SPAC1142.05	CTR3	ctr5	L000003441	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Beaudoin J (2011)	21273250	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	Overexpression of CTR4 and CTR5 rescues growth in a ctr1/ctr3 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
511665	2538930	2542170	275506	278645	SPCC188.13c	SPAC17G8.13c	dcr1	mst2	SPCC584.10c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Reddy BD (2011)	21289066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	double mutants show decreased sensitivity to TBZ|double mutants show decreased sensitivity to TBZ and FOA	-	BIOGRID
511666	2542862	2542170	279308	278645	SPAC140.03	SPAC17G8.13c	arb1	mst2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Reddy BD (2011)	21289066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
511667	2542879	2542170	279324	278645	SPAC13G7.07	SPAC17G8.13c	arb2	mst2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Reddy BD (2011)	21289066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
511668	2539403	2542170	275968	278645	SPCC736.11	SPAC17G8.13c	ago1	mst2	csp9	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Reddy BD (2011)	21289066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
511669	2542239	2542170	278711	278645	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC17G8.13c	chp1	mst2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Reddy BD (2011)	21289066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
511670	2542198	2542170	278673	278645	SPAC6F12.09	SPAC17G8.13c	rdp1	mst2	rdr1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Reddy BD (2011)	21289066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
511671	2539423	2542170	275988	278645	SPCC663.12	SPAC17G8.13c	cid12	mst2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Reddy BD (2011)	21289066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
511672	2538690	2542170	275275	278645	SPCC1393.05	SPAC17G8.13c	ers1	mst2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Reddy BD (2011)	21289066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
511673	2541372	2542170	277883	278645	SPBP8B7.28c	SPAC17G8.13c	stc1	mst2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Reddy BD (2011)	21289066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
511674	2538930	2540077	275506	276615	SPCC188.13c	SPBC17D11.04c	dcr1	nto1	SPCC584.10c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Reddy BD (2011)	21289066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	double mutants show decreased sensitivity to TBZ and FOA	-	BIOGRID
511675	2538930	2539706	275506	276259	SPCC188.13c	SPBC16G5.13	dcr1	ptf2	SPCC584.10c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Reddy BD (2011)	21289066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	double mutants show decreased sensitivity to TBZ and FOA	-	BIOGRID
511676	2538930	2542516	275506	278974	SPCC188.13c	SPAC2F7.04	dcr1	pmc2	SPCC584.10c	med1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Reddy BD (2011)	21289066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	double mutants show decreased sensitivity to TBZ	-	BIOGRID
511677	2539666	2540860	276221	277377	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC428.17c	eso1	wpl1	-	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Feytout A (2011)	21300781	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	overesxpression of wpl1 is lethal in an eso1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
511678	2539666	2543010	276221	279448	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC10F6.09c	eso1	psm3	-	smc3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Feytout A (2011)	21300781	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
511679	2539666	2540860	276221	277377	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC428.17c	eso1	wpl1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Feytout A (2011)	21300781	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	deletion of wpl1 rescues the growth defect in an eso1/pms3 double mutant at high temperatures|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
511680	2543010	2540860	279448	277377	SPAC10F6.09c	SPBC428.17c	psm3	wpl1	smc3	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Feytout A (2011)	21300781	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	deletion of wpl1 rescues the growth defect in an eso1/pms3 double mutant at high temperatures|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
511681	2539666	2543010	276221	279448	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC10F6.09c	eso1	psm3	-	smc3	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Feytout A (2011)	21300781	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	expression of an acetylated version of psm3 can partially rescue growth defects in an eso1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
511842	2542162	2542409	278638	278873	SPAC6F6.08c	SPAC17G8.10c	cdc16	dma1	bub2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Guertin DA (2002)	12479804	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
511843	2540650	2542409	277175	278873	SPBC244.01c	SPAC17G8.10c	sid4	dma1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Guertin DA (2002)	12479804	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
511844	2542409	2540650	278873	277175	SPAC17G8.10c	SPBC244.01c	dma1	sid4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Guertin DA (2002)	12479804	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
512886	2541633	2540013	278129	276557	SPAC664.01c	SPBC14C8.07c	swi6	cdc18	SPAC824.10c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Li PC (2011)	21239883	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
512887	2541633	2540013	278129	276557	SPAC664.01c	SPBC14C8.07c	swi6	cdc18	SPAC824.10c	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Li PC (2011)	21239883	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
512923	2542222	2542313	278695	278779	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC16A10.07c	sde2	taz1	-	myb|myb1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sugioka-Sugiyama R (2011)	21333630	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
512924	2542222	2539527	278695	276089	SPAC31G5.18c	SPCC338.16	sde2	pof3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sugioka-Sugiyama R (2011)	21333630	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
512925	2542222	2539352	278695	275918	SPAC31G5.18c	SPCC188.07	sde2	ccq1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sugioka-Sugiyama R (2011)	21333630	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
513673	2539737	2540309	276289	276839	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC21B10.13c	nrm1	yox1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Caetano C (2011)	21359180	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
513674	2540309	2539737	276839	276289	SPBC21B10.13c	SPBC16A3.07c	yox1	nrm1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Caetano C (2011)	21359180	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
513675	2540309	2539737	276839	276289	SPBC21B10.13c	SPBC16A3.07c	yox1	nrm1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Caetano C (2011)	21359180	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) Assay	-	BIOGRID
513676	2541871	2540309	278361	276839	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC21B10.13c	res2	yox1	mcs1|pct1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Caetano C (2011)	21359180	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
513677	2538959	2540309	275533	276839	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC21B10.13c	cds1	yox1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Caetano C (2011)	21359180	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	The sensitivity of cds1 mutant cells to HU or MMS was suppressed by inactivation of yox1 or nrm1.	-	BIOGRID
513678	2538959	2539737	275533	276289	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC16A3.07c	cds1	nrm1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Caetano C (2011)	21359180	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	The sensitivity of cds1 mutant cells to HU or MMS was suppressed by inactivation of yox1 or nrm1.	-	BIOGRID
513679	2543271	2542687	279699	279140	SPAC1002.08c	SPAC26H5.12	mtf1	rpo41	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Jiang H (2011)	21357609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
514086	2538959	2540234	275533	276766	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC336.12c	cds1	cdc10	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Dutta C (2009)	19750219	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in S phase:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
516052	2541168	2542256	277683	278726	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC29A4.08c	prp17	prp19	-	cwf8	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
516053	2542176	2542256	278651	278726	SPAC13C5.02	SPAC29A4.08c	dre4	prp19	hgp1	cwf8	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
516054	2542256	2541168	278726	277683	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC6B1.10	prp19	prp17	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
516055	2542256	2542176	278726	278651	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAC13C5.02	prp19	dre4	cwf8	hgp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517540	2540034	2539542	276576	276104	SPBC16C6.12c	SPCC4G3.18	las1	rix1	SPBC16C6.12c	SPCC4G3.18	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kitano E (2011)	21385875	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517541	2540034	2542844	276576	279290	SPBC16C6.12c	SPAC13G7.08c	las1	crb3	SPBC16C6.12c	ipi3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kitano E (2011)	21385875	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517542	2540034	2539329	276576	275895	SPBC16C6.12c	SPCC830.03	las1	grc3	SPBC16C6.12c	SPCC830.03	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kitano E (2011)	21385875	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517544	2542844	2539542	279290	276104	SPAC13G7.08c	SPCC4G3.18	crb3	rix1	ipi3	SPCC4G3.18	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kitano E (2011)	21385875	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517545	2542844	2540034	279290	276576	SPAC13G7.08c	SPBC16C6.12c	crb3	las1	ipi3	SPBC16C6.12c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kitano E (2011)	21385875	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517546	2542844	2539329	279290	275895	SPAC13G7.08c	SPCC830.03	crb3	grc3	ipi3	SPCC830.03	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kitano E (2011)	21385875	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517547	2542844	2539247	279290	275817	SPAC13G7.08c	SPCC1393.06c	crb3	ipi1	ipi3	SPCC1393.06c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kitano E (2011)	21385875	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517548	2539329	2539542	275895	276104	SPCC830.03	SPCC4G3.18	grc3	rix1	SPCC830.03	SPCC4G3.18	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kitano E (2011)	21385875	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517549	2539329	2540034	275895	276576	SPCC830.03	SPBC16C6.12c	grc3	las1	SPCC830.03	SPBC16C6.12c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kitano E (2011)	21385875	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517550	2539329	2542844	275895	279290	SPCC830.03	SPAC13G7.08c	grc3	crb3	SPCC830.03	ipi3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kitano E (2011)	21385875	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517552	2539329	2540034	275895	276576	SPCC830.03	SPBC16C6.12c	grc3	las1	SPCC830.03	SPBC16C6.12c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kitano E (2011)	21385875	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517553	2539329	2542844	275895	279290	SPCC830.03	SPAC13G7.08c	grc3	crb3	SPCC830.03	ipi3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kitano E (2011)	21385875	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517554	2539329	2540034	275895	276576	SPCC830.03	SPBC16C6.12c	grc3	las1	SPCC830.03	SPBC16C6.12c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kitano E (2011)	21385875	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
517555	2539329	2541635	275895	278131	SPCC830.03	SPAC1556.01c	grc3	rad50	SPCC830.03	SPAP4C9.01c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kitano E (2011)	21385875	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
517556	2539329	2542151	275895	278627	SPCC830.03	SPAC17A2.09c	grc3	csx1	SPCC830.03	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kitano E (2011)	21385875	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
517587	2541688	2542150	278184	278626	SPAC25G10.04c	SPAC17A5.11	rec10	rec12	rec20	spo11	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mallela S (2011)	21387406	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic recombination|sporulation|vegetative growth	double mutants show decreased spore viability and decreased intrachromosomal recombination	-	BIOGRID
517588	2542531	2540884	278989	277401	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC19C2.14	cwf2	smd3	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517589	2542531	2542690	278989	279143	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC27D7.07c	cwf2	smd1	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517590	2542531	2542256	278989	278726	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC29A4.08c	cwf2	prp19	prp3|cwc2	cwf8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517591	2542531	2539984	278989	276528	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC1289.11	cwf2	spf38	prp3|cwc2	cwf17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517592	2542531	3361260	278989	280336	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBP22H7.07	cwf2	prp5	prp3|cwc2	cwf1|pi024|SPACTOKYO_453.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517593	2542531	2538901	278989	275479	SPAC3A12.11c	SPCP1E11.07c	cwf2	cwf18	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517594	2542531	2539607	278989	276165	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC11G11.06c	cwf2	sme1	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517595	2542531	2542531	278989	278989	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC3A12.11c	cwf2	cwf2	prp3|cwc2	prp3|cwc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517596	2542531	2543583	278989	279998	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC644.12	cwf2	cdc5	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517597	2542531	2541168	278989	277683	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC6B1.10	cwf2	prp17	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517598	2542531	2543019	278989	279455	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC57A10.03	cwf2	cyp1	prp3|cwc2	cyp2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517599	2542531	2540434	278989	276962	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC24C6.11	cwf2	cwf14	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517600	2542531	2540855	278989	277372	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC4B4.05	cwf2	smg1	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517601	2542531	2538988	278989	275562	SPAC3A12.11c	SPCC188.11	cwf2	prp45	prp3|cwc2	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517602	2542531	2538974	278989	275548	SPAC3A12.11c	SPCC550.02c	cwf2	cwf5	prp3|cwc2	ecm2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517603	2542531	2540711	278989	277234	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC215.12	cwf2	cwf10	prp3|cwc2	snu114|spef2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517604	2542531	2540230	278989	276762	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC32F12.05c	cwf2	cwf12	prp3|cwc2	isy1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517605	2542531	2540585	278989	277111	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC28F2.04c	cwf2	cwf7	prp3|cwc2	spf27	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517606	2542531	2540852	278989	277369	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC428.12c	cwf2	SPBC428.12c	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517607	2542531	2540753	278989	277274	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC211.02c	cwf2	cwf3	prp3|cwc2	syf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517608	2542531	2543413	278989	279835	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC4F8.12c	cwf2	spp42	prp3|cwc2	cwf6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517609	2542531	2541124	278989	277639	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC646.02	cwf2	cwf11	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517610	2542531	2540330	278989	276860	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC3E7.14	cwf2	smf1	prp3|cwc2	SPBC4F6.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517611	2542531	2540983	278989	277499	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC337.06c	cwf2	cwf15	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517612	2542531	2539730	278989	276282	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC1861.08c	cwf2	lea1	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517613	2542531	2540328	278989	276858	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC31F10.11c	cwf2	cwf4	prp3|cwc2	syf3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517614	2542531	2542684	278989	279137	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC26A3.08	cwf2	smb1	prp3|cwc2	smb	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517615	2542531	2541219	278989	277733	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC8D2.09c	cwf2	msl1	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517616	2542531	2543189	278989	279618	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC30D11.09	cwf2	cwf19	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517617	2542531	2538787	278989	275368	SPAC3A12.11c	SPCC364.02c	cwf2	bis1	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517618	2542531	2542694	278989	279147	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC26H5.10c	cwf2	tif51	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517619	2542531	2540705	278989	277228	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC20F10.01	cwf2	gar1	prp3|cwc2	SPBC25H2.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517620	2542531	2542542	278989	278999	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC19A8.10	cwf2	rfp1	prp3|cwc2	mug140	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517621	2542531	2539376	278989	275942	SPAC3A12.11c	SPCC5E4.10c	cwf2	SPCC5E4.10c	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517622	2542531	2540611	278989	277137	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC3E7.13c	cwf2	syf2	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517623	2542531	2538797	278989	275378	SPAC3A12.11c	SPCC794.07	cwf2	lat1	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517624	2542531	2542545	278989	279002	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC19G12.07c	cwf2	rsd1	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517625	2542531	2540273	278989	276804	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC30D10.13c	cwf2	pdb1	prp3|cwc2	agg1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517626	2542531	2540149	278989	276686	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC1289.03c	cwf2	spi1	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517627	2542531	2541811	278989	278302	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC22A12.16	cwf2	SPAC22A12.16	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517628	2542531	2540057	278989	276595	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC16H5.10c	cwf2	prp43	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517629	2542531	2541457	278989	277960	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC6G10.10c	cwf2	SPAC6G10.10c	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517630	2542531	2539645	278989	276200	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC146.07	cwf2	prp2	prp3|cwc2	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517631	2542531	2539879	278989	276425	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC1703.07	cwf2	SPBC1703.07	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517632	2542531	2543616	278989	280030	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC4A8.09c	cwf2	cwf21	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517633	2542531	2542948	278989	279388	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC1006.07	cwf2	SPAC1006.07	prp3|cwc2	tif1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517634	2542531	2538832	278989	275413	SPAC3A12.11c	SPCC962.06c	cwf2	bpb1	prp3|cwc2	sf1|ods3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517635	2542531	2542433	278989	278895	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC17G6.14c	cwf2	uap56	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517636	2542531	2542269	278989	278738	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC1F12.07	cwf2	SPAC1F12.07	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517637	2542531	2542898	278989	279342	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC6F12.13c	cwf2	fps1	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517638	2542531	2538977	278989	275551	SPAC3A12.11c	SPCC1020.06c	cwf2	tal1	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517639	2542531	2538842	278989	275423	SPAC3A12.11c	SPCC1442.09	cwf2	trp3	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517640	2542531	2539093	278989	275665	SPAC3A12.11c	SPCC736.15	cwf2	pil1	prp3|cwc2	SPCC736.15	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517641	2542531	2542000	278989	278484	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC20H4.06c	cwf2	SPAC20H4.06c	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517642	2542531	2543676	278989	280090	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC9.03c	cwf2	brr2	prp3|cwc2	spp41	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517643	2542531	2542978	278989	279416	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC10F6.02c	cwf2	prp22	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517644	2542531	2541619	278989	278116	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC27F1.09c	cwf2	prp10	prp3|cwc2	sap155|SF3b155	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517645	2542531	2541437	278989	277942	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC22A12.09c	cwf2	sap114	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517646	2542531	2541609	278989	278106	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC22F8.10c	cwf2	sap145	prp3|cwc2	SF3b145	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517647	2542531	2541181	278989	277695	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC713.05	cwf2	SPBC713.05	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517648	2542531	2542634	278989	279088	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC24H6.04	cwf2	hxk1	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517649	2542531	2541579	278989	278076	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC26F1.03	cwf2	pda1	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517650	2542531	2540462	278989	276990	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC29A3.07c	cwf2	sap14	prp3|cwc2	sab14|SF3b14a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517651	2542531	2539751	278989	276303	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC13G1.02	cwf2	mpg2	prp3|cwc2	SPBC13G1.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517652	2542531	2540006	278989	276550	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC1711.17	cwf2	prp16	prp3|cwc2	SPBC17G9.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517653	2542531	2543229	278989	279657	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC56F8.05c	cwf2	mug64	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517654	2542531	2540831	278989	277349	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC428.02c	cwf2	eca39	prp3|cwc2	SPBC582.12c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517655	2542531	2541089	278989	277604	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC646.09c	cwf2	int6	prp3|cwc2	yin6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517656	2542531	2542212	278989	278686	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC1D4.04	cwf2	cct2	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517657	2542531	2542631	278989	279085	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC24H6.10c	cwf2	SPAC24H6.10c	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517658	2542531	2542163	278989	278639	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC29A4.15	cwf2	SPAC29A4.15	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517659	2542531	2542599	278989	279053	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC13A11.02c	cwf2	erg11	prp3|cwc2	cyp51	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517660	2542531	2540622	278989	277148	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC21C3.05	cwf2	sap62	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517661	2542531	2539055	278989	275628	SPAC3A12.11c	SPCC16A11.13	cwf2	luc7	prp3|cwc2	usp106	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517662	2542531	3361412	278989	280488	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC25G10.01	cwf2	SPAC25G10.01	prp3|cwc2	SPAC2C4.18	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517663	2542531	2539975	278989	276519	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC12C2.06	cwf2	dbp5	prp3|cwc2	SPBC12C2.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517664	2542531	2539784	278989	276334	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC1703.10	cwf2	ypt1	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517665	2542531	2541461	278989	277963	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC1F3.09	cwf2	mug161	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517666	2542531	2542874	278989	279319	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC20H4.09	cwf2	SPAC20H4.09	prp3|cwc2	SPAC145.03	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517667	2542531	2542222	278989	278695	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC31G5.18c	cwf2	sde2	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517668	2542531	2540978	278989	277494	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC342.02	cwf2	qrs1	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517669	2542531	2542836	278989	279282	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC13G7.06	cwf2	met16	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517670	2542531	2542871	278989	279316	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC6F12.10c	cwf2	ade3	prp3|cwc2	min11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517671	2542531	2540932	278989	277448	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC36.09	cwf2	sap61	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517672	2542531	2542868	278989	279313	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC1420.02c	cwf2	cct5	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517673	2542531	2539683	278989	276238	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC146.05c	cwf2	cwf25	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517674	2542531	2543278	278989	279706	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAPJ698.03c	cwf2	prp12	prp3|cwc2	sap130|SF3b130	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517675	2542531	2538931	278989	275507	SPAC3A12.11c	SPCC1620.10	cwf2	cwf26	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517676	2542531	2540707	278989	277230	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC19C2.01	cwf2	cdc28	prp3|cwc2	prp8|SPBC21B10.01c|SPBC874.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517677	2542531	2542910	278989	279353	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC1486.03c	cwf2	SPAC1486.03c	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517678	2542531	2542426	278989	278888	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC31G5.01	cwf2	sap49	prp3|cwc2	SPAPB1A11.05|SF3b49	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517679	2542531	2541843	278989	278334	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC23H3.02c	cwf2	ini1	prp3|cwc2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517680	2541168	2538901	277683	275479	SPBC6B1.10	SPCP1E11.07c	prp17	cwf18	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517681	2541168	2542256	277683	278726	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC29A4.08c	prp17	prp19	-	cwf8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517682	2541168	2540983	277683	277499	SPBC6B1.10	SPBC337.06c	prp17	cwf15	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517683	2541168	2540852	277683	277369	SPBC6B1.10	SPBC428.12c	prp17	SPBC428.12c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517684	2541168	2540330	277683	276860	SPBC6B1.10	SPBC3E7.14	prp17	smf1	-	SPBC4F6.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517685	2541168	2540884	277683	277401	SPBC6B1.10	SPBC19C2.14	prp17	smd3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517686	2541168	2542690	277683	279143	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC27D7.07c	prp17	smd1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517687	2541168	2540855	277683	277372	SPBC6B1.10	SPBC4B4.05	prp17	smg1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517688	2541168	2541168	277683	277683	SPBC6B1.10	SPBC6B1.10	prp17	prp17	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517689	2541168	2543019	277683	279455	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC57A10.03	prp17	cyp1	-	cyp2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517690	2541168	2538988	277683	275562	SPBC6B1.10	SPCC188.11	prp17	prp45	-	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517691	2541168	2538974	277683	275548	SPBC6B1.10	SPCC550.02c	prp17	cwf5	-	ecm2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517692	2541168	2540328	277683	276858	SPBC6B1.10	SPBC31F10.11c	prp17	cwf4	-	syf3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517693	2541168	3361260	277683	280336	SPBC6B1.10	SPBP22H7.07	prp17	prp5	-	cwf1|pi024|SPACTOKYO_453.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517694	2541168	2542531	277683	278989	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC3A12.11c	prp17	cwf2	-	prp3|cwc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517695	2541168	2540753	277683	277274	SPBC6B1.10	SPBC211.02c	prp17	cwf3	-	syf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517696	2541168	2540711	277683	277234	SPBC6B1.10	SPBC215.12	prp17	cwf10	-	snu114|spef2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517697	2541168	2543583	277683	279998	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC644.12	prp17	cdc5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517698	2541168	2539984	277683	276528	SPBC6B1.10	SPBC1289.11	prp17	spf38	-	cwf17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517699	2541168	2543413	277683	279835	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC4F8.12c	prp17	spp42	-	cwf6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517700	2541168	2541124	277683	277639	SPBC6B1.10	SPBC646.02	prp17	cwf11	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517701	2541168	2540585	277683	277111	SPBC6B1.10	SPBC28F2.04c	prp17	cwf7	-	spf27	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517702	2541168	2543189	277683	279618	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC30D11.09	prp17	cwf19	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517703	2541168	2539730	277683	276282	SPBC6B1.10	SPBC1861.08c	prp17	lea1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517704	2541168	2540230	277683	276762	SPBC6B1.10	SPBC32F12.05c	prp17	cwf12	-	isy1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517705	2541168	2540434	277683	276962	SPBC6B1.10	SPBC24C6.11	prp17	cwf14	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517706	2541168	2540705	277683	277228	SPBC6B1.10	SPBC20F10.01	prp17	gar1	-	SPBC25H2.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517707	2541168	2540611	277683	277137	SPBC6B1.10	SPBC3E7.13c	prp17	syf2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517708	2541168	2538787	277683	275368	SPBC6B1.10	SPCC364.02c	prp17	bis1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517709	2541168	2542684	277683	279137	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC26A3.08	prp17	smb1	-	smb	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517710	2541168	3361543	277683	280619	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC9.13c	prp17	cwf16	-	SPAPJ735.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517711	2541168	2543616	277683	280030	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC4A8.09c	prp17	cwf21	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517712	2541168	2541457	277683	277960	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC6G10.10c	prp17	SPAC6G10.10c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517713	2541168	3361412	277683	280488	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC25G10.01	prp17	SPAC25G10.01	-	SPAC2C4.18	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517714	2541168	2538931	277683	275507	SPBC6B1.10	SPCC1620.10	prp17	cwf26	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517715	2541168	2539607	277683	276165	SPBC6B1.10	SPBC11G11.06c	prp17	sme1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517716	2541168	2541219	277683	277733	SPBC6B1.10	SPBC8D2.09c	prp17	msl1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517717	2541168	2540057	277683	276595	SPBC6B1.10	SPBC16H5.10c	prp17	prp43	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517718	2541168	2539376	277683	275942	SPBC6B1.10	SPCC5E4.10c	prp17	SPCC5E4.10c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517719	2541168	2542426	277683	278888	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC31G5.01	prp17	sap49	-	SPAPB1A11.05|SF3b49	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517720	2541168	2542545	277683	279002	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC19G12.07c	prp17	rsd1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517721	2541168	2541328	277683	277840	SPBC6B1.10	SPBP23A10.12	prp17	frg1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517722	2541168	2543676	277683	280090	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC9.03c	prp17	brr2	-	spp41	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517723	2541168	2542978	277683	279416	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC10F6.02c	prp17	prp22	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517724	2541168	2542000	277683	278484	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC20H4.06c	prp17	SPAC20H4.06c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517725	2541168	2539683	277683	276238	SPBC6B1.10	SPBC146.05c	prp17	cwf25	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517726	2541168	2541619	277683	278116	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC27F1.09c	prp17	prp10	-	sap155|SF3b155	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517727	2541168	2539055	277683	275628	SPBC6B1.10	SPCC16A11.13	prp17	luc7	-	usp106	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517728	2541168	2540006	277683	276550	SPBC6B1.10	SPBC1711.17	prp17	prp16	-	SPBC17G9.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517729	2541168	2541461	277683	277963	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC1F3.09	prp17	mug161	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517730	2541168	2542222	277683	278695	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC31G5.18c	prp17	sde2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517731	2541168	2539847	277683	276395	SPBC6B1.10	SPBC530.14c	prp17	dsk1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517732	2541168	2542910	277683	279353	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC1486.03c	prp17	SPAC1486.03c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517733	2541168	2542874	277683	279319	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC20H4.09	prp17	SPAC20H4.09	-	SPAC145.03	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517734	2541168	2541181	277683	277695	SPBC6B1.10	SPBC713.05	prp17	SPBC713.05	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517735	2541168	2543123	277683	279555	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC343.17c	prp17	SPAC343.17c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517736	2541168	2538832	277683	275413	SPBC6B1.10	SPCC962.06c	prp17	bpb1	-	sf1|ods3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517737	2541168	2541843	277683	278334	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC23H3.02c	prp17	ini1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517738	2541168	2540186	277683	276719	SPBC6B1.10	SPBC13E7.02	prp17	cwf24	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517739	2541168	2540707	277683	277230	SPBC6B1.10	SPBC19C2.01	prp17	cdc28	-	prp8|SPBC21B10.01c|SPBC874.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517740	2541168	2539645	277683	276200	SPBC6B1.10	SPBC146.07	prp17	prp2	-	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517741	2541168	2540932	277683	277448	SPBC6B1.10	SPBC36.09	prp17	sap61	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517742	2541168	2540622	277683	277148	SPBC6B1.10	SPBC21C3.05	prp17	sap62	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517743	2541168	2542542	277683	278999	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC19A8.10	prp17	rfp1	-	mug140	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517744	2541168	2538797	277683	275378	SPBC6B1.10	SPCC794.07	prp17	lat1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517745	2541168	2541437	277683	277942	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC22A12.09c	prp17	sap114	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517746	2541168	2541609	277683	278106	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC22F8.10c	prp17	sap145	-	SF3b145	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517747	2541168	2543229	277683	279657	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC56F8.05c	prp17	mug64	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517748	2541168	2543278	277683	279706	SPBC6B1.10	SPAPJ698.03c	prp17	prp12	-	sap130|SF3b130	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517749	2541168	2540869	277683	277386	SPBC6B1.10	SPBC4B4.09	prp17	usp105	-	prp39	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517750	2541168	2540636	277683	277162	SPBC6B1.10	SPBC211.05	prp17	sap10	-	sab10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517751	2542256	2540884	278726	277401	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC19C2.14	prp19	smd3	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517752	2542256	2539607	278726	276165	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC11G11.06c	prp19	sme1	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517753	2542256	2542690	278726	279143	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAC27D7.07c	prp19	smd1	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517754	2542256	2539984	278726	276528	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC1289.11	prp19	spf38	cwf8	cwf17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517755	2542256	2542256	278726	278726	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAC29A4.08c	prp19	prp19	cwf8	cwf8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517756	2542256	2540585	278726	277111	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC28F2.04c	prp19	cwf7	cwf8	spf27	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517757	2542256	2538901	278726	275479	SPAC29A4.08c	SPCP1E11.07c	prp19	cwf18	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517758	2542256	2542684	278726	279137	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAC26A3.08	prp19	smb1	cwf8	smb	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517759	2542256	2541124	278726	277639	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC646.02	prp19	cwf11	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517760	2542256	2541168	278726	277683	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC6B1.10	prp19	prp17	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517761	2542256	3361260	278726	280336	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBP22H7.07	prp19	prp5	cwf8	cwf1|pi024|SPACTOKYO_453.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517762	2542256	2540753	278726	277274	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC211.02c	prp19	cwf3	cwf8	syf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517763	2542256	2540330	278726	276860	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC3E7.14	prp19	smf1	cwf8	SPBC4F6.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517764	2542256	2543413	278726	279835	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAC4F8.12c	prp19	spp42	cwf8	cwf6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517765	2542256	2538974	278726	275548	SPAC29A4.08c	SPCC550.02c	prp19	cwf5	cwf8	ecm2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517766	2542256	2540711	278726	277234	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC215.12	prp19	cwf10	cwf8	snu114|spef2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517767	2542256	2542531	278726	278989	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAC3A12.11c	prp19	cwf2	cwf8	prp3|cwc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517768	2542256	2538988	278726	275562	SPAC29A4.08c	SPCC188.11	prp19	prp45	cwf8	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517769	2542256	2540434	278726	276962	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC24C6.11	prp19	cwf14	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517770	2542256	2540328	278726	276858	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC31F10.11c	prp19	cwf4	cwf8	syf3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517771	2542256	2540855	278726	277372	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC4B4.05	prp19	smg1	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517772	2542256	2543583	278726	279998	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAC644.12	prp19	cdc5	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517773	2542256	2540852	278726	277369	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC428.12c	prp19	SPBC428.12c	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517774	2542256	2539730	278726	276282	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC1861.08c	prp19	lea1	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517775	2542256	2540230	278726	276762	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC32F12.05c	prp19	cwf12	cwf8	isy1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517776	2542256	2540611	278726	277137	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC3E7.13c	prp19	syf2	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517777	2542256	2543019	278726	279455	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAC57A10.03	prp19	cyp1	cwf8	cyp2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517778	2542256	2541219	278726	277733	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC8D2.09c	prp19	msl1	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517779	2542256	2543189	278726	279618	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAC30D11.09	prp19	cwf19	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517780	2542256	2540983	278726	277499	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC337.06c	prp19	cwf15	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517781	2542256	2540462	278726	276990	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC29A3.07c	prp19	sap14	cwf8	sab14|SF3b14a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517782	2542256	2538787	278726	275368	SPAC29A4.08c	SPCC364.02c	prp19	bis1	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517783	2542256	2541437	278726	277942	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAC22A12.09c	prp19	sap114	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517784	2542256	2542978	278726	279416	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAC10F6.02c	prp19	prp22	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517785	2542256	2541461	278726	277963	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAC1F3.09	prp19	mug161	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517786	2542256	2540622	278726	277148	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC21C3.05	prp19	sap62	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517787	2542256	2543676	278726	280090	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAC9.03c	prp19	brr2	cwf8	spp41	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517788	2542256	2543616	278726	280030	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAC4A8.09c	prp19	cwf21	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517789	2542256	2541619	278726	278116	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAC27F1.09c	prp19	prp10	cwf8	sap155|SF3b155	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517790	2542256	2542000	278726	278484	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAC20H4.06c	prp19	SPAC20H4.06c	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517791	2542256	2541181	278726	277695	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC713.05	prp19	SPBC713.05	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517792	2542256	2540636	278726	277162	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC211.05	prp19	sap10	cwf8	sab10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517793	2542256	2542874	278726	279319	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAC20H4.09	prp19	SPAC20H4.09	cwf8	SPAC145.03	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517794	2542256	2539683	278726	276238	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC146.05c	prp19	cwf25	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517795	2542256	2542222	278726	278695	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAC31G5.18c	prp19	sde2	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517796	2542256	2540057	278726	276595	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC16H5.10c	prp19	prp43	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517797	2542256	2541328	278726	277840	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBP23A10.12	prp19	frg1	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517798	2542256	2540186	278726	276719	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC13E7.02	prp19	cwf24	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517799	2542256	2543278	278726	279706	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAPJ698.03c	prp19	prp12	cwf8	sap130|SF3b130	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517800	2542256	2541457	278726	277960	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAC6G10.10c	prp19	SPAC6G10.10c	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517801	2542256	2540932	278726	277448	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC36.09	prp19	sap61	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517802	2542256	2541609	278726	278106	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAC22F8.10c	prp19	sap145	cwf8	SF3b145	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517803	2542256	2538931	278726	275507	SPAC29A4.08c	SPCC1620.10	prp19	cwf26	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517804	2542256	2542910	278726	279353	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAC1486.03c	prp19	SPAC1486.03c	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517805	2542256	2540006	278726	276550	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC1711.17	prp19	prp16	cwf8	SPBC17G9.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517806	2542256	2540707	278726	277230	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC19C2.01	prp19	cdc28	cwf8	prp8|SPBC21B10.01c|SPBC874.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517807	2542256	3361543	278726	280619	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAC9.13c	prp19	cwf16	cwf8	SPAPJ735.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517808	2542256	2539847	278726	276395	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC530.14c	prp19	dsk1	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517809	2542256	2538832	278726	275413	SPAC29A4.08c	SPCC962.06c	prp19	bpb1	cwf8	sf1|ods3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517810	2542256	2541843	278726	278334	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAC23H3.02c	prp19	ini1	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517811	2542256	2540869	278726	277386	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC4B4.09	prp19	usp105	cwf8	prp39	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517812	2542256	2539055	278726	275628	SPAC29A4.08c	SPCC16A11.13	prp19	luc7	cwf8	usp106	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517813	2542256	2542426	278726	278888	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAC31G5.01	prp19	sap49	cwf8	SPAPB1A11.05|SF3b49	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517814	2542256	2542545	278726	279002	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAC19G12.07c	prp19	rsd1	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517815	2542256	2543123	278726	279555	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAC343.17c	prp19	SPAC343.17c	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517816	2542256	2542599	278726	279053	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAC13A11.02c	prp19	erg11	cwf8	cyp51	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517817	2542256	2540705	278726	277228	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC20F10.01	prp19	gar1	cwf8	SPBC25H2.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517818	2542256	2539645	278726	276200	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC146.07	prp19	prp2	cwf8	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517819	2542256	2539376	278726	275942	SPAC29A4.08c	SPCC5E4.10c	prp19	SPCC5E4.10c	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517820	2539205	2541957	275775	278444	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC23C11.16	mid1	plo1	dmf1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Almonacid M (2011)	21376600	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517821	2541168	2542256	277683	278726	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC29A4.08c	prp17	prp19	-	cwf8	Two-hybrid	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517822	2542256	2541168	278726	277683	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC6B1.10	prp19	prp17	cwf8	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517824	2540585	2541168	277111	277683	SPBC28F2.04c	SPBC6B1.10	cwf7	prp17	spf27	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517825	2540585	2542256	277111	278726	SPBC28F2.04c	SPAC29A4.08c	cwf7	prp19	spf27	cwf8	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517826	2542256	2540585	278726	277111	SPAC29A4.08c	SPBC28F2.04c	prp19	cwf7	cwf8	spf27	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517829	2543129	2539205	279561	275775	SPAC4F8.13c	SPCC4B3.15	rng2	mid1	-	dmf1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Almonacid M (2011)	21376600	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517830	2542176	2542176	278651	278651	SPAC13C5.02	SPAC13C5.02	dre4	dre4	hgp1	hgp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517831	2542176	2539395	278651	275960	SPAC13C5.02	SPCC663.11	dre4	saf1	hgp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517832	2542176	2542684	278651	279137	SPAC13C5.02	SPAC26A3.08	dre4	smb1	hgp1	smb	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517833	2542176	2540622	278651	277148	SPAC13C5.02	SPBC21C3.05	dre4	sap62	hgp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517834	2542176	2541616	278651	278113	SPAC13C5.02	SPAC2F3.14c	dre4	saf2	hgp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517835	2542176	2538931	278651	275507	SPAC13C5.02	SPCC1620.10	dre4	cwf26	hgp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517836	2542176	2542690	278651	279143	SPAC13C5.02	SPAC27D7.07c	dre4	smd1	hgp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517837	2542176	2540711	278651	277234	SPAC13C5.02	SPBC215.12	dre4	cwf10	hgp1	snu114|spef2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517838	2542176	2542348	278651	278813	SPAC13C5.02	SPAC1782.03	dre4	saf3	hgp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517839	2542176	2541437	278651	277942	SPAC13C5.02	SPAC22A12.09c	dre4	sap114	hgp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517840	2542176	2541212	278651	277726	SPAC13C5.02	SPBC887.05c	dre4	cwf29	hgp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517841	2542176	2543413	278651	279835	SPAC13C5.02	SPAC4F8.12c	dre4	spp42	hgp1	cwf6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517842	2542176	2541609	278651	278106	SPAC13C5.02	SPAC22F8.10c	dre4	sap145	hgp1	SF3b145	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517843	2542176	2542545	278651	279002	SPAC13C5.02	SPAC19G12.07c	dre4	rsd1	hgp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517844	2542176	3361260	278651	280336	SPAC13C5.02	SPBP22H7.07	dre4	prp5	hgp1	cwf1|pi024|SPACTOKYO_453.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517845	2542176	2540932	278651	277448	SPAC13C5.02	SPBC36.09	dre4	sap61	hgp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517846	2542176	2540453	278651	276981	SPAC13C5.02	SPBC19C2.08	dre4	prp38	hgp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517847	2542176	2541763	278651	278257	SPAC13C5.02	SPAC22F3.11c	dre4	snu23	hgp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517848	2542176	2541619	278651	278116	SPAC13C5.02	SPAC27F1.09c	dre4	prp10	hgp1	sap155|SF3b155	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517849	2542176	2543278	278651	279706	SPAC13C5.02	SPAPJ698.03c	dre4	prp12	hgp1	sap130|SF3b130	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517850	2542176	2540462	278651	276990	SPAC13C5.02	SPBC29A3.07c	dre4	sap14	hgp1	sab14|SF3b14a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517851	2542176	2540884	278651	277401	SPAC13C5.02	SPBC19C2.14	dre4	smd3	hgp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517852	2542176	2540983	278651	277499	SPAC13C5.02	SPBC337.06c	dre4	cwf15	hgp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517853	2542176	2542256	278651	278726	SPAC13C5.02	SPAC29A4.08c	dre4	prp19	hgp1	cwf8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517854	2542176	2539730	278651	276282	SPAC13C5.02	SPBC1861.08c	dre4	lea1	hgp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517855	2542176	2543676	278651	280090	SPAC13C5.02	SPAC9.03c	dre4	brr2	hgp1	spp41	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517856	2542176	2539984	278651	276528	SPAC13C5.02	SPBC1289.11	dre4	spf38	hgp1	cwf17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517857	2542176	2539645	278651	276200	SPAC13C5.02	SPBC146.07	dre4	prp2	hgp1	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517858	2542176	2540328	278651	276858	SPAC13C5.02	SPBC31F10.11c	dre4	cwf4	hgp1	syf3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517859	2542176	2540855	278651	277372	SPAC13C5.02	SPBC4B4.05	dre4	smg1	hgp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517860	2542176	2540753	278651	277274	SPAC13C5.02	SPBC211.02c	dre4	cwf3	hgp1	syf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517861	2542176	2543229	278651	279657	SPAC13C5.02	SPAC56F8.05c	dre4	mug64	hgp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517862	2542176	2541124	278651	277639	SPAC13C5.02	SPBC646.02	dre4	cwf11	hgp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517863	2542176	2541168	278651	277683	SPAC13C5.02	SPBC6B1.10	dre4	prp17	hgp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517864	2542176	2542531	278651	278989	SPAC13C5.02	SPAC3A12.11c	dre4	cwf2	hgp1	prp3|cwc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517865	2542176	2538988	278651	275562	SPAC13C5.02	SPCC188.11	dre4	prp45	hgp1	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517866	2542176	2543583	278651	279998	SPAC13C5.02	SPAC644.12	dre4	cdc5	hgp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517867	2542176	2540585	278651	277111	SPAC13C5.02	SPBC28F2.04c	dre4	cwf7	hgp1	spf27	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517868	2542176	2538974	278651	275548	SPAC13C5.02	SPCC550.02c	dre4	cwf5	hgp1	ecm2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517869	2542123	2538959	278599	275533	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC18B5.11c	mal3	cds1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kume K (2011)	21336311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517870	2538959	2539857	275533	276404	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC1604.20c	cds1	tea2	-	klp4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kume K (2011)	21336311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517871	2543044	2540024	279479	276568	SPAC3C7.12	SPBP4H10.04	tip1	ppb1	noc1	SPBC1346.01c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kume K (2011)	21336311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517872	2539857	2540024	276404	276568	SPBC1604.20c	SPBP4H10.04	tea2	ppb1	klp4	SPBC1346.01c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kume K (2011)	21336311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517873	2538959	2540024	275533	276568	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBP4H10.04	cds1	ppb1	-	SPBC1346.01c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kume K (2011)	21336311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517874	2539395	2540585	275960	277111	SPCC663.11	SPBC28F2.04c	saf1	cwf7	-	spf27	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517875	2539395	3361260	275960	280336	SPCC663.11	SPBP22H7.07	saf1	prp5	-	cwf1|pi024|SPACTOKYO_453.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517876	2539395	2540855	275960	277372	SPCC663.11	SPBC4B4.05	saf1	smg1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517877	2539395	2539395	275960	275960	SPCC663.11	SPCC663.11	saf1	saf1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517878	2539395	2541124	275960	277639	SPCC663.11	SPBC646.02	saf1	cwf11	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517879	2539395	2539984	275960	276528	SPCC663.11	SPBC1289.11	saf1	spf38	-	cwf17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517880	2539395	2542176	275960	278651	SPCC663.11	SPAC13C5.02	saf1	dre4	-	hgp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517881	2539395	2540753	275960	277274	SPCC663.11	SPBC211.02c	saf1	cwf3	-	syf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517882	2539395	2543583	275960	279998	SPCC663.11	SPAC644.12	saf1	cdc5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517883	2539395	2543229	275960	279657	SPCC663.11	SPAC56F8.05c	saf1	mug64	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517884	2539395	2542256	275960	278726	SPCC663.11	SPAC29A4.08c	saf1	prp19	-	cwf8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517885	2539395	2540711	275960	277234	SPCC663.11	SPBC215.12	saf1	cwf10	-	snu114|spef2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517886	2539395	2543413	275960	279835	SPCC663.11	SPAC4F8.12c	saf1	spp42	-	cwf6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517887	2539395	2541168	275960	277683	SPCC663.11	SPBC6B1.10	saf1	prp17	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517888	2539395	2542684	275960	279137	SPCC663.11	SPAC26A3.08	saf1	smb1	-	smb	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517889	2539395	2540983	275960	277499	SPCC663.11	SPBC337.06c	saf1	cwf15	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517890	2539395	2538974	275960	275548	SPCC663.11	SPCC550.02c	saf1	cwf5	-	ecm2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517891	2541616	2540622	278113	277148	SPAC2F3.14c	SPBC21C3.05	saf2	sap62	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517892	2541616	2542256	278113	278726	SPAC2F3.14c	SPAC29A4.08c	saf2	prp19	-	cwf8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517893	2541616	2539645	278113	276200	SPAC2F3.14c	SPBC146.07	saf2	prp2	-	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517894	2541616	2540855	278113	277372	SPAC2F3.14c	SPBC4B4.05	saf2	smg1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517895	2541616	2541616	278113	278113	SPAC2F3.14c	SPAC2F3.14c	saf2	saf2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517896	2541616	2539984	278113	276528	SPAC2F3.14c	SPBC1289.11	saf2	spf38	-	cwf17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517897	2541616	2540932	278113	277448	SPAC2F3.14c	SPBC36.09	saf2	sap61	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517898	2541616	2541609	278113	278106	SPAC2F3.14c	SPAC22F8.10c	saf2	sap145	-	SF3b145	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517899	2541616	2538988	278113	275562	SPAC2F3.14c	SPCC188.11	saf2	prp45	-	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517900	2541616	2543413	278113	279835	SPAC2F3.14c	SPAC4F8.12c	saf2	spp42	-	cwf6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517901	2541616	3361260	278113	280336	SPAC2F3.14c	SPBP22H7.07	saf2	prp5	-	cwf1|pi024|SPACTOKYO_453.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517902	2541616	2540983	278113	277499	SPAC2F3.14c	SPBC337.06c	saf2	cwf15	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517903	2541616	2538974	278113	275548	SPAC2F3.14c	SPCC550.02c	saf2	cwf5	-	ecm2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517904	2541616	2542348	278113	278813	SPAC2F3.14c	SPAC1782.03	saf2	saf3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517905	2541616	2543278	278113	279706	SPAC2F3.14c	SPAPJ698.03c	saf2	prp12	-	sap130|SF3b130	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517906	2541616	2542531	278113	278989	SPAC2F3.14c	SPAC3A12.11c	saf2	cwf2	-	prp3|cwc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517907	2541616	2540711	278113	277234	SPAC2F3.14c	SPBC215.12	saf2	cwf10	-	snu114|spef2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517908	2541616	2538931	278113	275507	SPAC2F3.14c	SPCC1620.10	saf2	cwf26	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517909	2541616	2539361	278113	275927	SPAC2F3.14c	SPCC162.01c	saf2	SPCC162.01c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517910	2541616	2541437	278113	277942	SPAC2F3.14c	SPAC22A12.09c	saf2	sap114	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517911	2541616	2540585	278113	277111	SPAC2F3.14c	SPBC28F2.04c	saf2	cwf7	-	spf27	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517912	2541616	2541168	278113	277683	SPAC2F3.14c	SPBC6B1.10	saf2	prp17	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517913	2541616	2543583	278113	279998	SPAC2F3.14c	SPAC644.12	saf2	cdc5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517914	2541616	2543229	278113	279657	SPAC2F3.14c	SPAC56F8.05c	saf2	mug64	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517915	2541616	2541124	278113	277639	SPAC2F3.14c	SPBC646.02	saf2	cwf11	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517916	2541616	2540753	278113	277274	SPAC2F3.14c	SPBC211.02c	saf2	cwf3	-	syf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517917	2541616	2542545	278113	279002	SPAC2F3.14c	SPAC19G12.07c	saf2	rsd1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517918	2541616	2541619	278113	278116	SPAC2F3.14c	SPAC27F1.09c	saf2	prp10	-	sap155|SF3b155	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517919	2541616	2539730	278113	276282	SPAC2F3.14c	SPBC1861.08c	saf2	lea1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517920	2541616	2543676	278113	280090	SPAC2F3.14c	SPAC9.03c	saf2	brr2	-	spp41	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517921	2541616	2540328	278113	276858	SPAC2F3.14c	SPBC31F10.11c	saf2	cwf4	-	syf3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517922	2541616	2541185	278113	277699	SPAC2F3.14c	SPBC6B1.07	saf2	prp1	-	zer1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517923	2542348	2541763	278813	278257	SPAC1782.03	SPAC22F3.11c	saf3	snu23	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517924	2542348	2542348	278813	278813	SPAC1782.03	SPAC1782.03	saf3	saf3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517925	2542348	2540453	278813	276981	SPAC1782.03	SPBC19C2.08	saf3	prp38	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517926	2542348	2542545	278813	279002	SPAC1782.03	SPAC19G12.07c	saf3	rsd1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517927	2542348	2541616	278813	278113	SPAC1782.03	SPAC2F3.14c	saf3	saf2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517928	2542348	2539984	278813	276528	SPAC1782.03	SPBC1289.11	saf3	spf38	-	cwf17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517929	2542348	2540855	278813	277372	SPAC1782.03	SPBC4B4.05	saf3	smg1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517930	2542348	2540711	278813	277234	SPAC1782.03	SPBC215.12	saf3	cwf10	-	snu114|spef2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517931	2542348	2542176	278813	278651	SPAC1782.03	SPAC13C5.02	saf3	dre4	-	hgp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517932	2542348	2542684	278813	279137	SPAC1782.03	SPAC26A3.08	saf3	smb1	-	smb	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517933	2542348	2540622	278813	277148	SPAC1782.03	SPBC21C3.05	saf3	sap62	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517934	2542348	2541609	278813	278106	SPAC1782.03	SPAC22F8.10c	saf3	sap145	-	SF3b145	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517935	2542348	2540932	278813	277448	SPAC1782.03	SPBC36.09	saf3	sap61	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517936	2542348	2542690	278813	279143	SPAC1782.03	SPAC27D7.07c	saf3	smd1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517937	2542348	2543413	278813	279835	SPAC1782.03	SPAC4F8.12c	saf3	spp42	-	cwf6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517938	2542348	2541477	278813	277979	SPAC1782.03	SPAC227.12	saf3	rna4	-	SPAC227.12|prp4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517939	2542348	2541619	278813	278116	SPAC1782.03	SPAC27F1.09c	saf3	prp10	-	sap155|SF3b155	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517940	2542348	2542256	278813	278726	SPAC1782.03	SPAC29A4.08c	saf3	prp19	-	cwf8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517941	2542348	2540462	278813	276990	SPAC1782.03	SPBC29A3.07c	saf3	sap14	-	sab14|SF3b14a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517942	2542348	2541185	278813	277699	SPAC1782.03	SPBC6B1.07	saf3	prp1	-	zer1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517943	2542348	2543676	278813	280090	SPAC1782.03	SPAC9.03c	saf3	brr2	-	spp41	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517944	2542348	2542774	278813	279223	SPAC1782.03	SPAC167.03c	saf3	snu66	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517945	2542348	2541437	278813	277942	SPAC1782.03	SPAC22A12.09c	saf3	sap114	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517946	2542348	2540045	278813	276583	SPAC1782.03	SPBC119.13c	saf3	prp31	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517947	2542348	2539730	278813	276282	SPAC1782.03	SPBC1861.08c	saf3	lea1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517948	2542348	2543278	278813	279706	SPAC1782.03	SPAPJ698.03c	saf3	prp12	-	sap130|SF3b130	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517949	2542348	2541686	278813	278182	SPAC1782.03	SPAC29E6.02	saf3	prp3	-	SPAC30.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517950	2542348	2539645	278813	276200	SPAC1782.03	SPBC146.07	saf3	prp2	-	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517951	2542348	2538988	278813	275562	SPAC1782.03	SPCC188.11	saf3	prp45	-	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517952	2542348	3361260	278813	280336	SPAC1782.03	SPBP22H7.07	saf3	prp5	-	cwf1|pi024|SPACTOKYO_453.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517953	2542348	2538974	278813	275548	SPAC1782.03	SPCC550.02c	saf3	cwf5	-	ecm2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517954	2542348	2538931	278813	275507	SPAC1782.03	SPCC1620.10	saf3	cwf26	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517955	2542348	2540328	278813	276858	SPAC1782.03	SPBC31F10.11c	saf3	cwf4	-	syf3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517956	2542348	2540884	278813	277401	SPAC1782.03	SPBC19C2.14	saf3	smd3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517957	2542348	2538711	278813	275295	SPAC1782.03	SPCC1281.02c	saf3	spf30	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517958	2542348	2540585	278813	277111	SPAC1782.03	SPBC28F2.04c	saf3	cwf7	-	spf27	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517959	2542348	2543583	278813	279998	SPAC1782.03	SPAC644.12	saf3	cdc5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517960	2542348	2543229	278813	279657	SPAC1782.03	SPAC56F8.05c	saf3	mug64	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517961	2542348	2540753	278813	277274	SPAC1782.03	SPBC211.02c	saf3	cwf3	-	syf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517962	2542348	2541212	278813	277726	SPAC1782.03	SPBC887.05c	saf3	cwf29	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517963	2540024	2538959	276568	275533	SPBP4H10.04	SPCC18B5.11c	ppb1	cds1	SPBC1346.01c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kume K (2011)	21336311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein transport:wild type	deletion of the hit protein blocks the NETO delay seen in a Ppb1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
517964	2540024	2539857	276568	276404	SPBP4H10.04	SPBC1604.20c	ppb1	tea2	SPBC1346.01c	klp4	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kume K (2011)	21336311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein transport:wild type	deletion of the hit protein blocks the NETO delay seen in a Ppb1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
517965	2540024	2543044	276568	279479	SPBP4H10.04	SPAC3C7.12	ppb1	tip1	SPBC1346.01c	noc1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kume K (2011)	21336311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein transport:wild type	deletion of the hit protein blocks the NETO delay seen in a Ppb1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
517966	2542176	2542531	278651	278989	SPAC13C5.02	SPAC3A12.11c	dre4	cwf2	hgp1	prp3|cwc2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517967	2542176	2541168	278651	277683	SPAC13C5.02	SPBC6B1.10	dre4	prp17	hgp1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517968	2542176	2543583	278651	279998	SPAC13C5.02	SPAC644.12	dre4	cdc5	hgp1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
517969	2543129	2539205	279561	275775	SPAC4F8.13c	SPCC4B3.15	rng2	mid1	-	dmf1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Padmanabhan A (2011)	21376595	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
518043	2541861	2540043	278351	276581	SPAC5D6.08c	SPBC1198.12	mes1	mfr1	-	SPBC660.02|fzr1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kimata Y (2011)	21389117	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:wild type	deletion of mfr1 rescues the loss of meiosis II in a mes1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
518055	2541861	2540043	278351	276581	SPAC5D6.08c	SPBC1198.12	mes1	mfr1	-	SPBC660.02|fzr1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kimata Y (2011)	21389117	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
518056	2541861	2543222	278351	279650	SPAC5D6.08c	SPAC821.08c	mes1	slp1	-	cdc20	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kimata Y (2011)	21389117	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
518704	2539395	2542176	275960	278651	SPCC663.11	SPAC13C5.02	saf1	dre4	-	hgp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
518705	2542176	2539395	278651	275960	SPAC13C5.02	SPCC663.11	dre4	saf1	hgp1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
518706	2542176	2539395	278651	275960	SPAC13C5.02	SPCC663.11	dre4	saf1	hgp1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
518707	2542256	2539395	278726	275960	SPAC29A4.08c	SPCC663.11	prp19	saf1	cwf8	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
518708	2539395	2542256	275960	278726	SPCC663.11	SPAC29A4.08c	saf1	prp19	-	cwf8	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
518710	2539395	2541124	275960	277639	SPCC663.11	SPBC646.02	saf1	cwf11	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
518711	2539395	2542176	275960	278651	SPCC663.11	SPAC13C5.02	saf1	dre4	-	hgp1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
519055	2543510	2543565	279928	279981	SPAC30D11.07	SPAPB24D3.04c	nth1	mag1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kanamitsu K (2007)	18270439	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	double mutants show decreased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
519056	2543510	2540646	279928	277171	SPAC30D11.07	SPBC23G7.11	nth1	mag2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kanamitsu K (2007)	18270439	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	double mutants show decreased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
519147	2540764	2542140	277284	278616	SPBC19C7.02	SPAC1783.07c	ubr1	pap1	SPBC32F12.14	caf3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kitamura K (2011)	21410566	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	Caffeine resistance	-	BIOGRID
519149	2540764	2542140	277284	278616	SPBC19C7.02	SPAC1783.07c	ubr1	pap1	SPBC32F12.14	caf3	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kitamura K (2011)	21410566	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	Deletion of PAP1 rescues the growth defect of an ubr1 caf1 double mutant. (ubr1 caf1 pap1 triple mutant)	-	BIOGRID
519151	2541522	2540578	278023	277104	SPAC23E2.01	SPBC26H8.06	fep1	grx4	gaf2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jbel M (2011)	21421748	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
519152	2540578	2541522	277104	278023	SPBC26H8.06	SPAC23E2.01	grx4	fep1	-	gaf2	Two-hybrid	physical	Jbel M (2011)	21421748	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
519153	2542299	2541522	278766	278023	SPAC18B11.10	SPAC23E2.01	tup11	fep1	-	gaf2	Two-hybrid	physical	Jbel M (2011)	21421748	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
519545	2541350	2540731	277861	277254	SPBP4H10.11c	SPBC18H10.02	lcf2	lcf1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Fujita Y (2007)	18071249	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chemical compound accumulation	double mutants show reduced fatty acid levels	-	BIOGRID
519565	2540580	2541755	277106	278249	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC2F7.11	ran1	nrd1	pat1	msa2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Oowatari Y (2011)	21409593	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
519570	2542757	2542618	279207	279072	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC1952.15c	mre11	rec24	rad32	mug6	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Bonfils S (2011)	21429938	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spore germination:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
519572	2539330	2542618	275896	279072	SPCC1753.03c	SPAC1952.15c	rec7	rec24	-	mug6	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bonfils S (2011)	21429938	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
519661	2542150	2541326	278626	277838	SPAC17A5.11	SPBP35G2.03c	rec12	sgo1	spo11	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hirose Y (2011)	21423721	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation	double mutants show increased equational segregation of sister centromeres	-	BIOGRID
519662	2540221	2541326	276754	277838	SPBC32F12.02	SPBP35G2.03c	rec14	sgo1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hirose Y (2011)	21423721	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation	double mutants show increased equational segregation of sister centromeres	-	BIOGRID
519663	2542150	2540589	278626	277115	SPAC17A5.11	SPBC20F10.06	rec12	mad2	spo11	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Hirose Y (2011)	21423721	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:partial rescue	deletion of mad2 decreased equational sister centromere separation in both a rec12 single mutant and the rec12/sgo1 double mutant but did not completely abolish it|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
519664	2541326	2540589	277838	277115	SPBP35G2.03c	SPBC20F10.06	sgo1	mad2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Hirose Y (2011)	21423721	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:partial rescue	deletion of mad2 decreased equational sister centromere separation in both a rec12 single mutant and the rec12/sgo1 double mutant but did not completely abolish it|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
519827	2540589	2542150	277115	278626	SPBC20F10.06	SPAC17A5.11	mad2	rec12	-	spo11	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hirose Y (2011)	21423721	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation	mad2/rec12 sister centromeres frequently dissociate and fail to move toward the poles, which is only rarely seen in a mad2 single mutant	-	BIOGRID
519828	2540144	2543233	276681	279661	SPBC1778.08c	SPAC630.03	arc3	arp3	arc21	act2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Cabrera R (2011)	21449051	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
519829	2543233	2540144	279661	276681	SPAC630.03	SPBC1778.08c	arp3	arc3	act2	arc21	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Cabrera R (2011)	21449051	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
519830	2540144	2541767	276681	278261	SPBC1778.08c	SPAC6G9.07c	arc3	arc4	arc21	arp10	Two-hybrid	physical	Cabrera R (2011)	21449051	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
522403	2543263	2541536	279691	278036	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC1071.02	med6	mms19	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.92	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522404	2541536	3361561	278036	280637	SPAC1071.02	SPAC11E3.01c	mms19	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522405	2543263	2543008	279691	279446	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC12B10.13	med6	SPAC12B10.13	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522406	2543263	2540106	279691	276643	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC12D12.09	med6	rev7	pmc5	SPAC12D12.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522407	2543263	2542757	279691	279207	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC13C5.07	med6	mre11	pmc5	rad32	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522408	2541642	2542757	278138	279207	SPAC10F6.05c	SPAC13C5.07	ubc6	mre11	-	rad32	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522409	2541628	2542757	278124	279207	SPAC110.02	SPAC13C5.07	pds5	mre11	-	rad32	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522410	2543263	2541650	279691	278146	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC14C4.12c	med6	laf1	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522411	2541536	2541643	278036	278139	SPAC1071.02	SPAC14C4.13	mms19	rad17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522412	2541628	2541643	278124	278139	SPAC110.02	SPAC14C4.13	pds5	rad17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522413	2542757	2541643	279207	278139	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC14C4.13	mre11	rad17	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522414	2541628	2542788	278124	279237	SPAC110.02	SPAC15A10.15	pds5	sgo2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522415	2543263	2541573	279691	278070	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC16.04	med6	dus3	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522416	3361381	2542111	280457	278587	SPAC12G12.01c	SPAC1687.14c	SPAC12G12.01c	SPAC1687.14c	SPAC630.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522417	2541536	2542318	278036	278784	SPAC1071.02	SPAC16C9.05	mms19	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522418	2541628	2542318	278124	278784	SPAC110.02	SPAC16C9.05	pds5	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.6648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522419	3361561	2542318	280637	278784	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC16C9.05	swr1	cph1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.8579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522420	2541575	2542318	278072	278784	SPAC12B10.01c	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC12B10.01c	cph1	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522421	2541650	2542318	278146	278784	SPAC14C4.12c	SPAC16C9.05	laf1	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522422	2542311	2542318	278777	278784	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC16C9.05	dad1	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522423	2542318	2542363	278784	278827	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC1783.05	cph1	hrp1	-	chd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.0628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522424	3361401	2542277	280477	278746	SPAC1093.03	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC1093.03	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522425	3361478	2542277	280554	278746	SPAC13A11.06	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC13A11.06	dbr1	SPAC3H8.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522426	2541818	2542150	278309	278626	SPAC11G7.02	SPAC17A5.11	pub1	rec12	-	spo11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522427	2542757	2542150	279207	278626	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC17A5.11	mre11	rec12	rad32	spo11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.69	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522428	2541575	2542168	278072	278643	SPAC12B10.01c	SPAC17A5.16	SPAC12B10.01c	ftp105	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522429	2542757	2542168	279207	278643	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC17A5.16	mre11	ftp105	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522430	2542318	2542168	278784	278643	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC17A5.16	cph1	ftp105	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522431	2542318	2542145	278784	278621	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC17C9.09c	cph1	tim13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522432	2541575	2542289	278072	278757	SPAC12B10.01c	SPAC17G6.03	SPAC12B10.01c	SPAC17G6.03	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522433	2542924	2542289	279365	278757	SPAC12B10.04	SPAC17G6.03	pby1	SPAC17G6.03	SPAC12B10.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522434	2541536	2542421	278036	278884	SPAC1071.02	SPAC17G8.05	mms19	med20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522435	2542757	2542421	279207	278884	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC17G8.05	mre11	med20	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522436	2541650	2542421	278146	278884	SPAC14C4.12c	SPAC17G8.05	laf1	med20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522437	2542300	2542421	278767	278884	SPAC1687.22c	SPAC17G8.05	puf3	med20	SPAC222.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522438	2542150	2542421	278626	278884	SPAC17A5.11	SPAC17G8.05	rec12	med20	spo11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.7215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522439	2541536	2542278	278036	278747	SPAC1071.02	SPAC17G8.07	mms19	yaf9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522440	2542300	2542278	278767	278747	SPAC1687.22c	SPAC17G8.07	puf3	yaf9	SPAC222.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522441	2542311	2542278	278777	278747	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC17G8.07	dad1	yaf9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.0951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522442	2542318	2542278	278784	278747	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC17G8.07	cph1	yaf9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.6077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522443	2542277	2542278	278746	278747	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC17G8.07	dbr1	yaf9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522444	2542145	2542278	278621	278747	SPAC17C9.09c	SPAC17G8.07	tim13	yaf9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522445	2543263	2542409	279691	278873	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC17G8.10c	med6	dma1	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522446	2543263	2542170	279691	278645	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC17G8.13c	med6	mst2	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522447	2541536	2542207	278036	278682	SPAC1071.02	SPAC17H9.10c	mms19	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522448	2542135	2542207	278611	278682	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC17H9.10c	ubp8	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522449	2542757	2542207	279207	278682	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC17H9.10c	mre11	ddb1	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.1819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522450	2542767	2542207	279217	278682	SPAC1565.07c	SPAC17H9.10c	knd1	ddb1	SPAC1565.07c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522451	2541580	2542207	278077	278682	SPAC1687.05	SPAC17H9.10c	pli1	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522452	2542318	2542207	278784	278682	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC17H9.10c	cph1	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.2372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522453	2542757	2542398	279207	278862	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC1805.03c	mre11	trm13	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522454	2543263	2542418	279691	278881	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC1805.07c	med6	dad2	pmc5	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.0212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522455	2541628	2542418	278124	278881	SPAC110.02	SPAC1805.07c	pds5	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522456	3361561	2542418	280637	278881	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC1805.07c	swr1	dad2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.4858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522457	2542757	2542418	279207	278881	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC1805.07c	mre11	dad2	rad32	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522458	2541650	2542418	278146	278881	SPAC14C4.12c	SPAC1805.07c	laf1	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522459	5802929	2542418	858067	278881	SPAC1556.08c	SPAC1805.07c	cbs2	dad2	SPAC1F12.01c	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522460	2541580	2542418	278077	278881	SPAC1687.05	SPAC1805.07c	pli1	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.5943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522461	2542300	2542418	278767	278881	SPAC1687.22c	SPAC1805.07c	puf3	dad2	SPAC222.02c	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522462	2542318	2542418	278784	278881	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC1805.07c	cph1	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.2071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522463	2542363	2542418	278827	278881	SPAC1783.05	SPAC1805.07c	hrp1	dad2	chd1	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522464	2542277	2542418	278746	278881	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC1805.07c	dbr1	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522465	2542207	2542418	278682	278881	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC1805.07c	ddb1	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522466	2542278	2542463	278747	278924	SPAC17G8.07	SPAC1834.03c	yaf9	hhf1	-	h4.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522467	2542418	2542463	278881	278924	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC1834.03c	dad2	hhf1	hos2	h4.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522468	2542207	2542467	278682	278928	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC1834.04	ddb1	hht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522469	2542421	2542119	278884	278595	SPAC17G8.05	SPAC1834.08	med20	mak1	-	phk3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522470	2542757	2542239	279207	278711	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC18G6.02c	mre11	chp1	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.2838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522471	2542318	2542239	278784	278711	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC18G6.02c	cph1	chp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522472	2542398	2542239	278862	278711	SPAC1805.03c	SPAC18G6.02c	trm13	chp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522473	2541818	2542123	278309	278599	SPAC11G7.02	SPAC18G6.15	pub1	mal3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522474	2542757	2542123	279207	278599	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC18G6.15	mre11	mal3	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522475	2542318	2542123	278784	278599	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC18G6.15	cph1	mal3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522476	2542349	2542123	278814	278599	SPAC1782.05	SPAC18G6.15	ypa2	mal3	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522477	2542418	2542123	278881	278599	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC18G6.15	dad2	mal3	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.6847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522478	2541628	2542568	278124	279024	SPAC110.02	SPAC1952.02	pds5	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522479	2541762	2542568	278256	279024	SPAC139.01c	SPAC1952.02	SPAC139.01c	tma23	SPAC955.02c	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522480	2542363	2542568	278827	279024	SPAC1783.05	SPAC1952.02	hrp1	tma23	chd1	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522481	2542252	2542568	278722	279024	SPAC17A2.13c	SPAC1952.02	rad25	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522482	2542277	2542568	278746	279024	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC1952.02	dbr1	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522483	2542239	2542568	278711	279024	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC1952.02	chp1	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522484	2542123	2542568	278599	279024	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC1952.02	mal3	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522485	2541628	2542513	278124	278971	SPAC110.02	SPAC1952.05	pds5	gcn5	-	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522486	2542135	2542513	278611	278971	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC1952.05	ubp8	gcn5	-	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522487	2542757	2542513	279207	278971	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC1952.05	mre11	gcn5	rad32	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522488	2542311	2542513	278777	278971	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC1952.05	dad1	gcn5	-	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522489	2542168	2542513	278643	278971	SPAC17A5.16	SPAC1952.05	ftp105	gcn5	-	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522490	2542278	2542513	278747	278971	SPAC17G8.07	SPAC1952.05	yaf9	gcn5	-	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522491	2542170	2542513	278645	278971	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC1952.05	mst2	gcn5	-	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522492	2542123	2542513	278599	278971	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC1952.05	mal3	gcn5	-	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522493	2541536	2542558	278036	279014	SPAC1071.02	SPAC1952.07	mms19	rad1	-	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522494	2542757	2542558	279207	279014	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC1952.07	mre11	rad1	rad32	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522495	2542295	2542558	278763	279014	SPAC17H9.03c	SPAC1952.07	rdl1	rad1	-	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.74	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522496	2542757	2542127	279207	278603	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC1952.12c	mre11	csn71	rad32	csn7|csn7a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522497	2543263	2542522	279691	278980	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC19A8.03	med6	ymr1	pmc5	SPAC19A8.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522498	3361381	2542522	280457	278980	SPAC12G12.01c	SPAC19A8.03	SPAC12G12.01c	ymr1	SPAC630.02	SPAC19A8.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522499	2542168	2542522	278643	278980	SPAC17A5.16	SPAC19A8.03	ftp105	ymr1	-	SPAC19A8.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522500	2541536	2542469	278036	278930	SPAC1071.02	SPAC19A8.04	mms19	erg5	-	cyp61	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522501	2542168	2542469	278643	278930	SPAC17A5.16	SPAC19A8.04	ftp105	erg5	-	cyp61	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522502	2542239	2542462	278711	278923	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC19B12.11c	chp1	SPAC19B12.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522503	2542318	2542466	278784	278927	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC19E9.01c	cph1	nup40	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522504	2542421	2542466	278884	278927	SPAC17G8.05	SPAC19E9.01c	med20	nup40	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522505	2542418	2542466	278881	278927	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC19E9.01c	dad2	nup40	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522506	2541628	2542237	278124	278709	SPAC110.02	SPAC19E9.02	pds5	fin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522507	2542318	2542237	278784	278709	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC19E9.02	cph1	fin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522508	2542278	2542237	278747	278709	SPAC17G8.07	SPAC19E9.02	yaf9	fin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522509	2542418	2542237	278881	278709	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC19E9.02	dad2	fin1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522510	2542123	2542237	278599	278709	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC19E9.02	mal3	fin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522511	2542207	2542582	278682	279037	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC19G12.02c	ddb1	pms1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522512	3361381	2542519	280457	278977	SPAC12G12.01c	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC12G12.01c	scs7	SPAC630.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522513	2542767	2542519	279217	278977	SPAC1565.07c	SPAC19G12.08	knd1	scs7	SPAC1565.07c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522514	2542318	2542519	278784	278977	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC19G12.08	cph1	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.6046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522515	2542168	2542519	278643	278977	SPAC17A5.16	SPAC19G12.08	ftp105	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.5359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522516	2542207	2542519	278682	278977	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC19G12.08	ddb1	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.4204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522517	2542418	2542519	278881	278977	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC19G12.08	dad2	scs7	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.8777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522518	2542568	2542519	279024	278977	SPAC1952.02	SPAC19G12.08	tma23	scs7	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522519	2542466	2542519	278927	278977	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC19G12.08	nup40	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522520	2542237	2542519	278709	278977	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC19G12.08	fin1	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522521	2542168	2542550	278643	279007	SPAC17A5.16	SPAC1B3.02c	ftp105	SPAC1B3.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522522	2541536	2542541	278036	278998	SPAC1071.02	SPAC1B3.03c	mms19	wis2	-	cyp5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522523	2542318	2542541	278784	278998	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC1B3.03c	cph1	wis2	-	cyp5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522524	2542278	2542541	278747	278998	SPAC17G8.07	SPAC1B3.03c	yaf9	wis2	-	cyp5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522525	2542311	2542126	278777	278602	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC1B3.05	dad1	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522526	2542277	2542126	278746	278602	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC1B3.05	dbr1	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522527	2542278	2542126	278747	278602	SPAC17G8.07	SPAC1B3.05	yaf9	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522528	2542207	2542126	278682	278602	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC1B3.05	ddb1	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522529	2542418	2542126	278881	278602	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC1B3.05	dad2	not3	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522530	2542237	2542126	278709	278602	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC1B3.05	fin1	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.2471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522531	2543263	2542459	279691	278920	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC1D4.03c	med6	aut12	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522532	3361561	2542459	280637	278920	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC1D4.03c	swr1	aut12	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522533	2542421	2542459	278884	278920	SPAC17G8.05	SPAC1D4.03c	med20	aut12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.0964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522534	2542318	2541468	278784	277970	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC1F5.09c	cph1	shk2	-	pak2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522535	2542568	2541468	279024	277970	SPAC1952.02	SPAC1F5.09c	tma23	shk2	SPAC1952.02	pak2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522536	2542462	2541468	278923	277970	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC1F5.09c	SPAC19B12.11c	shk2	-	pak2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522537	2541536	2541746	278036	278240	SPAC1071.02	SPAC20G4.04c	mms19	hus1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522538	2542757	2541746	279207	278240	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC20G4.04c	mre11	hus1	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.6765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522539	2542757	2541941	279207	278428	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC20H4.03c	mre11	tfs1	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522540	2542318	2541941	278784	278428	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC20H4.03c	cph1	tfs1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522541	2542925	2542007	279366	278490	SPAC11E3.04c	SPAC20H4.07	ubc13	rad57	spu13|sst5	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.1185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522542	2540106	2542007	276643	278490	SPBC12D12.09	SPAC20H4.07	rev7	rad57	SPAC12D12.09	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.5912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522543	3361391	2542007	280467	278490	SPAC13G6.01c	SPAC20H4.07	rad8	rad57	SPAC5H10.14c	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.3312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522544	2541643	2542007	278139	278490	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC20H4.07	rad17	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-19.615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522545	2541580	2542007	278077	278490	SPAC1687.05	SPAC20H4.07	pli1	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.7843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522546	2542318	2542007	278784	278490	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC20H4.07	cph1	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522547	2542418	2542007	278881	278490	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC20H4.07	dad2	rad57	hos2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.2529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522548	2542558	2542007	279014	278490	SPAC1952.07	SPAC20H4.07	rad1	rad57	rad19	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-20.4698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522549	2541468	2542007	277970	278490	SPAC1F5.09c	SPAC20H4.07	shk2	rad57	pak2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522550	2541746	2542007	278240	278490	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC20H4.07	hus1	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-18.8758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522551	2542311	2542023	278777	278506	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC20H4.10	dad1	ufd2	-	SPAC145.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522552	2542418	2542023	278881	278506	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC20H4.10	dad2	ufd2	hos2	SPAC145.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522553	2542519	2542023	278977	278506	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC20H4.10	scs7	ufd2	-	SPAC145.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522554	2542568	3361533	279024	280609	SPAC1952.02	SPAC222.15	tma23	meu13	SPAC1952.02	SPAC821.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522555	2541628	2542066	278124	278543	SPAC110.02	SPAC227.05	pds5	SPAC227.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522556	2541762	2542066	278256	278543	SPAC139.01c	SPAC227.05	SPAC139.01c	SPAC227.05	SPAC955.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522557	2542418	2542066	278881	278543	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC227.05	dad2	SPAC227.05	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522558	2541762	2541498	278256	278000	SPAC139.01c	SPAC227.10	SPAC139.01c	SPAC227.10	SPAC955.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522559	2543263	2541899	279691	278389	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC22E12.11c	med6	set3	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522560	2541536	2541899	278036	278389	SPAC1071.02	SPAC22E12.11c	mms19	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.4944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522561	2542311	2541899	278777	278389	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC22E12.11c	dad1	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522562	2542277	2541899	278746	278389	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC22E12.11c	dbr1	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522563	2542421	2541899	278884	278389	SPAC17G8.05	SPAC22E12.11c	med20	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522564	2542278	2541899	278747	278389	SPAC17G8.07	SPAC22E12.11c	yaf9	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.3223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522565	2542418	2541899	278881	278389	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC22E12.11c	dad2	set3	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522566	2541642	2541786	278138	278278	SPAC10F6.05c	SPAC22F3.08c	ubc6	rok1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522567	2541628	2541786	278124	278278	SPAC110.02	SPAC22F3.08c	pds5	rok1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522568	3361456	2541786	280532	278278	SPAC1142.03c	SPAC22F3.08c	swi2	rok1	SPAC17G6.20c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522569	3361391	2541786	280467	278278	SPAC13G6.01c	SPAC22F3.08c	rad8	rok1	SPAC5H10.14c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522570	2542252	2541786	278722	278278	SPAC17A2.13c	SPAC22F3.08c	rad25	rok1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522571	2542278	2541786	278747	278278	SPAC17G8.07	SPAC22F3.08c	yaf9	rok1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522572	2542207	2541786	278682	278278	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC22F3.08c	ddb1	rok1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522573	2542519	2541786	278977	278278	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC22F3.08c	scs7	rok1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522574	2541899	2541786	278389	278278	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC22F3.08c	set3	rok1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522575	2542207	2541871	278682	278361	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC22F3.09c	ddb1	res2	-	mcs1|pct1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522576	2542418	2541871	278881	278361	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC22F3.09c	dad2	res2	hos2	mcs1|pct1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522577	2542123	2541871	278599	278361	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC22F3.09c	mal3	res2	-	mcs1|pct1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522578	2542513	2541871	278971	278361	SPAC1952.05	SPAC22F3.09c	gcn5	res2	kat2	mcs1|pct1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522579	2542207	2541663	278682	278159	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC22G7.08	ddb1	ppk8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522580	2542418	2541663	278881	278159	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC22G7.08	dad2	ppk8	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522581	2542513	2541663	278971	278159	SPAC1952.05	SPAC22G7.08	gcn5	ppk8	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522582	2543263	2541885	279691	278375	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC22H10.03c	med6	kap114	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522583	2541536	2541885	278036	278375	SPAC1071.02	SPAC22H10.03c	mms19	kap114	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.9649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522584	2542145	2541885	278621	278375	SPAC17C9.09c	SPAC22H10.03c	tim13	kap114	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522585	2542757	2541744	279207	278238	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC23A1.02c	mre11	SPAC23A1.02c	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522586	2542925	2542036	279366	278518	SPAC11E3.04c	SPAC23A1.19c	ubc13	hrq1	spu13|sst5	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-23.776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522587	2542757	2542036	279207	278518	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC23A1.19c	mre11	hrq1	rad32	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522588	3361391	2542036	280467	278518	SPAC13G6.01c	SPAC23A1.19c	rad8	hrq1	SPAC5H10.14c	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-23.1337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522589	2541643	2542036	278139	278518	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC23A1.19c	rad17	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-23.5072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522590	2541580	2542036	278077	278518	SPAC1687.05	SPAC23A1.19c	pli1	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.2795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522591	2542318	2542036	278784	278518	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC23A1.19c	cph1	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522592	2542418	2542036	278881	278518	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC23A1.19c	dad2	hrq1	hos2	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522593	2542558	2542036	279014	278518	SPAC1952.07	SPAC23A1.19c	rad1	hrq1	rad19	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-24.2742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522594	2541746	2542036	278240	278518	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC23A1.19c	hus1	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-23.7937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522595	2542007	2542036	278490	278518	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC23A1.19c	rad57	hrq1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.8571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522596	2543008	2542032	279446	278514	SPAC12B10.13	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC12B10.13	pnk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522597	2540106	2542032	276643	278514	SPBC12D12.09	SPAC23C11.04c	rev7	pnk1	SPAC12D12.09	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522598	2542757	2542032	279207	278514	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC23C11.04c	mre11	pnk1	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.4302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522599	3361391	2542032	280467	278514	SPAC13G6.01c	SPAC23C11.04c	rad8	pnk1	SPAC5H10.14c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522600	2542418	2542032	278881	278514	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC23C11.04c	dad2	pnk1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522601	2542568	2542032	279024	278514	SPAC1952.02	SPAC23C11.04c	tma23	pnk1	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.8381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522602	2542462	2542032	278923	278514	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC19B12.11c	pnk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522603	2542519	2542032	278977	278514	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC23C11.04c	scs7	pnk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.2854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522604	2542550	2542032	279007	278514	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC1B3.02c	pnk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522605	2542126	2542032	278602	278514	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC23C11.04c	not3	pnk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522606	2541899	2542032	278389	278514	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC23C11.04c	set3	pnk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522607	2541786	2542032	278278	278514	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC23C11.04c	rok1	pnk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.5708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522608	2541871	2542032	278361	278514	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC23C11.04c	res2	pnk1	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.0151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522609	2542757	2541961	279207	278448	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC23C4.02	mre11	crn1	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522610	2542066	2541961	278543	278448	SPAC227.05	SPAC23C4.02	SPAC227.05	crn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522611	2542066	2541929	278543	278417	SPAC227.05	SPAC23C4.12	SPAC227.05	hhp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522612	2542032	2541929	278514	278417	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC23C4.12	pnk1	hhp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522613	2543263	2541496	279691	277998	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC23D3.09	med6	arp42	pmc5	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.8144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522614	3361561	2541496	280637	277998	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC23D3.09	swr1	arp42	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522615	2541762	2541496	278256	277998	SPAC139.01c	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC139.01c	arp42	SPAC955.02c	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522616	3361478	2541496	280554	277998	SPAC13A11.06	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC13A11.06	arp42	SPAC3H8.01	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522617	2542757	2541496	279207	277998	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC23D3.09	mre11	arp42	rad32	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.1143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522618	2542861	2541496	279307	277998	SPAC13G7.13c	SPAC23D3.09	msa1	arp42	SPAC6C3.01c	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522619	2542300	2541496	278767	277998	SPAC1687.22c	SPAC23D3.09	puf3	arp42	SPAC222.02c	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522620	2542318	2541496	278784	277998	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC23D3.09	cph1	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.1287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522621	2542277	2541496	278746	277998	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC23D3.09	dbr1	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.1646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522622	2542168	2541496	278643	277998	SPAC17A5.16	SPAC23D3.09	ftp105	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.6181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522623	2542421	2541496	278884	277998	SPAC17G8.05	SPAC23D3.09	med20	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.7285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522624	2542278	2541496	278747	277998	SPAC17G8.07	SPAC23D3.09	yaf9	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522625	2542123	2541496	278599	277998	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC23D3.09	mal3	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522626	2542568	2541496	279024	277998	SPAC1952.02	SPAC23D3.09	tma23	arp42	SPAC1952.02	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522627	2542513	2541496	278971	277998	SPAC1952.05	SPAC23D3.09	gcn5	arp42	kat2	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.4267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522628	2542462	2541496	278923	277998	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC19B12.11c	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522629	2542540	2541496	278997	277998	SPAC19D5.06c	SPAC23D3.09	din1	arp42	rai1	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522630	2542126	2541496	278602	277998	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC23D3.09	not3	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.1782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522631	2542459	2541496	278920	277998	SPAC1D4.03c	SPAC23D3.09	aut12	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522632	2541941	2541496	278428	277998	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC23D3.09	tfs1	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522633	2542007	2541496	278490	277998	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC23D3.09	rad57	arp42	rhp57|SPAC145.01	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.6407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522634	2542023	2541496	278506	277998	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC23D3.09	ufd2	arp42	SPAC145.04	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522635	2541899	2541496	278389	277998	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC23D3.09	set3	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522636	2541798	2541496	278289	277998	SPAC22F3.03c	SPAC23D3.09	rdh54	arp42	mug34|tid1	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522637	2541871	2541496	278361	277998	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC23D3.09	res2	arp42	mcs1|pct1	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522638	3361381	2541781	280457	278274	SPAC12G12.01c	SPAC23G3.07c	SPAC12G12.01c	snf30	SPAC630.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522639	2542349	2541845	278814	278336	SPAC1782.05	SPAC23G3.08c	ypa2	ubp7	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522640	2542513	2541845	278971	278336	SPAC1952.05	SPAC23G3.08c	gcn5	ubp7	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522641	2542519	2541845	278977	278336	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC23G3.08c	scs7	ubp7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522642	2542007	2541438	278490	277943	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC23G3.10c	rad57	ssr3	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522643	2543263	2541776	279691	278270	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC23H3.05c	med6	swd1	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522644	2541536	2541776	278036	278270	SPAC1071.02	SPAC23H3.05c	mms19	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.7903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522645	3361561	2541776	280637	278270	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC23H3.05c	swr1	swd1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.93	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522646	2541535	2541776	278035	278270	SPAC12G12.10	SPAC23H3.05c	wdr21	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522647	2542757	2541776	279207	278270	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC23H3.05c	mre11	swd1	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522648	2542300	2541776	278767	278270	SPAC1687.22c	SPAC23H3.05c	puf3	swd1	SPAC222.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522649	2542311	2541776	278777	278270	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC23H3.05c	dad1	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522650	2542349	2541776	278814	278270	SPAC1782.05	SPAC23H3.05c	ypa2	swd1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522651	2542277	2541776	278746	278270	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC23H3.05c	dbr1	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522652	2542168	2541776	278643	278270	SPAC17A5.16	SPAC23H3.05c	ftp105	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522653	2542513	2541776	278971	278270	SPAC1952.05	SPAC23H3.05c	gcn5	swd1	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522654	2542466	2541776	278927	278270	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC23H3.05c	nup40	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522655	2542519	2541776	278977	278270	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC23H3.05c	scs7	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522656	2542541	2541776	278998	278270	SPAC1B3.03c	SPAC23H3.05c	wis2	swd1	cyp5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522657	2542126	2541776	278602	278270	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC23H3.05c	not3	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522658	2541871	2541776	278361	278270	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC23H3.05c	res2	swd1	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522659	2541496	2541776	277998	278270	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC23H3.05c	arp42	swd1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.0023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522660	2543263	2541856	279691	278347	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC23H3.08c	med6	bub3	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522661	2541628	2541856	278124	278347	SPAC110.02	SPAC23H3.08c	pds5	bub3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522662	2542311	2541856	278777	278347	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC23H3.08c	dad1	bub3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522663	2542318	2541856	278784	278347	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC23H3.08c	cph1	bub3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522664	2542237	2541856	278709	278347	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC23H3.08c	fin1	bub3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.2714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522665	2542421	2541789	278884	278281	SPAC17G8.05	SPAC23H4.08	med20	iwr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522666	2542126	2541789	278602	278281	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC23H4.08	not3	iwr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522667	2541899	2541789	278389	278281	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC23H4.08	set3	iwr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522668	2542318	2541538	278784	278038	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC24B11.08c	cph1	SPAC24B11.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522669	2541961	2541538	278448	278038	SPAC23C4.02	SPAC24B11.08c	crn1	SPAC24B11.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522670	2541536	2541531	278036	278031	SPAC1071.02	SPAC25A8.01c	mms19	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522671	3361561	2541531	280637	278031	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC25A8.01c	swr1	fft3	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-19.5768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522672	2541818	2541531	278309	278031	SPAC11G7.02	SPAC25A8.01c	pub1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522673	2542757	2541531	279207	278031	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC25A8.01c	mre11	fft3	rad32	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.9937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522674	2542311	2541531	278777	278031	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC25A8.01c	dad1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-18.0978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522675	2542145	2541531	278621	278031	SPAC17C9.09c	SPAC25A8.01c	tim13	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522676	2542398	2541531	278862	278031	SPAC1805.03c	SPAC25A8.01c	trm13	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522677	2542418	2541531	278881	278031	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC25A8.01c	dad2	fft3	hos2	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.5597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522678	2542513	2541531	278971	278031	SPAC1952.05	SPAC25A8.01c	gcn5	fft3	kat2	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.6485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522679	2542462	2541531	278923	278031	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC19B12.11c	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522680	2542466	2541531	278927	278031	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC25A8.01c	nup40	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522681	2542459	2541531	278920	278031	SPAC1D4.03c	SPAC25A8.01c	aut12	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522682	2542066	2541531	278543	278031	SPAC227.05	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC227.05	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522683	2541498	2541531	278000	278031	SPAC227.10	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC227.10	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522684	2541899	2541531	278389	278031	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC25A8.01c	set3	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.0373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522685	2541786	2541531	278278	278031	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC25A8.01c	rok1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522686	2541496	2541531	277998	278031	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC25A8.01c	arp42	fft3	arp4	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.3284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522687	2542278	2541578	278747	278075	SPAC17G8.07	SPAC25B8.05	yaf9	deg1	-	SPAC25B8.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522688	2542239	2541578	278711	278075	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC25B8.05	chp1	deg1	-	SPAC25B8.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522689	2542418	2542732	278881	279182	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC25G10.07c	dad2	cut7	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.8904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522690	2542295	2542086	278763	278563	SPAC17H9.03c	SPAC25H1.02	rdl1	jmj1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522691	2542757	2541656	279207	278152	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC25H1.06	mre11	pcf3	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.0207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522692	2542295	2541656	278763	278152	SPAC17H9.03c	SPAC25H1.06	rdl1	pcf3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522693	2542318	2542667	278784	279120	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC26A3.16	cph1	dph1	-	ucp5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522694	2541786	2542667	278278	279120	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC26A3.16	rok1	dph1	-	ucp5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522695	3361533	2542087	280609	278564	SPAC222.15	SPAC26F1.02	meu13	pnn1	SPAC821.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522696	2541628	2542071	278124	278548	SPAC110.02	SPAC26H5.03	pds5	pcf2	-	cac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522697	2542757	2542071	279207	278548	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC26H5.03	mre11	pcf2	rad32	cac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.8865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522698	2542558	2542071	279014	278548	SPAC1952.07	SPAC26H5.03	rad1	pcf2	rad19	cac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522699	2541746	2542071	278240	278548	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC26H5.03	hus1	pcf2	-	cac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522700	2542007	2542071	278490	278548	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC26H5.03	rad57	pcf2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	cac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522701	2542568	2542081	279024	278558	SPAC1952.02	SPAC26H5.04	tma23	SPAC26H5.04	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522702	2541642	2542701	278138	279154	SPAC10F6.05c	SPAC26H5.05	ubc6	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522703	2542925	2542701	279366	279154	SPAC11E3.04c	SPAC26H5.05	ubc13	mga2	spu13|sst5	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522704	2542135	2542701	278611	279154	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC26H5.05	ubp8	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522705	2542757	2542701	279207	279154	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC26H5.05	mre11	mga2	rad32	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522706	2541580	2542701	278077	279154	SPAC1687.05	SPAC26H5.05	pli1	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522707	2542318	2542701	278784	279154	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC26H5.05	cph1	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.6847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522708	2542363	2542701	278827	279154	SPAC1783.05	SPAC26H5.05	hrp1	mga2	chd1	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522709	2542278	2542701	278747	279154	SPAC17G8.07	SPAC26H5.05	yaf9	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522710	2542170	2542701	278645	279154	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC26H5.05	mst2	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522711	2542418	2542701	278881	279154	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC26H5.05	dad2	mga2	hos2	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522712	2542239	2542701	278711	279154	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC26H5.05	chp1	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522713	2542513	2542701	278971	279154	SPAC1952.05	SPAC26H5.05	gcn5	mga2	kat2	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.5167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522714	2542066	2542701	278543	279154	SPAC227.05	SPAC26H5.05	SPAC227.05	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522715	2541498	2542701	278000	279154	SPAC227.10	SPAC26H5.05	SPAC227.10	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.1359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522716	2541929	2542701	278417	279154	SPAC23C4.12	SPAC26H5.05	hhp2	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522717	2542087	2542701	278564	279154	SPAC26F1.02	SPAC26H5.05	pnn1	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522718	2542462	2541733	278923	278227	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC27F1.03c	SPAC19B12.11c	uch1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522719	2542462	2541479	278923	277981	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC27F1.06c	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC27F1.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522720	2541628	2541614	278124	278111	SPAC110.02	SPAC29A4.20	pds5	elp3	-	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522721	2541575	2541614	278072	278111	SPAC12B10.01c	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC12B10.01c	elp3	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522722	2541580	2541614	278077	278111	SPAC1687.05	SPAC29A4.20	pli1	elp3	-	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522723	2542318	2541614	278784	278111	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC29A4.20	cph1	elp3	-	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.5966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522724	2542168	2541614	278643	278111	SPAC17A5.16	SPAC29A4.20	ftp105	elp3	-	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522725	2542141	2541614	278617	278111	SPAC17C9.05c	SPAC29A4.20	pmc3	elp3	med27|prk1	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522726	2542278	2541614	278747	278111	SPAC17G8.07	SPAC29A4.20	yaf9	elp3	-	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522727	2542207	2541614	278682	278111	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC29A4.20	ddb1	elp3	-	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522728	2542123	2541614	278599	278111	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC29A4.20	mal3	elp3	-	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522729	2542466	2541614	278927	278111	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC29A4.20	nup40	elp3	-	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522730	2542237	2541614	278709	278111	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC29A4.20	fin1	elp3	-	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522731	2542519	2541614	278977	278111	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC29A4.20	scs7	elp3	-	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.9042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522732	2541468	2541614	277970	278111	SPAC1F5.09c	SPAC29A4.20	shk2	elp3	pak2	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522733	2541871	2541614	278361	278111	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC29A4.20	res2	elp3	mcs1|pct1	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522734	2542032	2541614	278514	278111	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC29A4.20	pnk1	elp3	-	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.6404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522735	2541929	2541614	278417	278111	SPAC23C4.12	SPAC29A4.20	hhp2	elp3	-	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522736	2541496	2541614	277998	278111	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC29A4.20	arp42	elp3	arp4	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.8907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522737	2541531	2541614	278031	278111	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC29A4.20	fft3	elp3	snf2SR	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522738	2541578	2541614	278075	278111	SPAC25B8.05	SPAC29A4.20	deg1	elp3	SPAC25B8.05	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.7381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522739	2541536	2542094	278036	278571	SPAC1071.02	SPAC29B12.06c	mms19	rcd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522740	2542168	2542094	278643	278571	SPAC17A5.16	SPAC29B12.06c	ftp105	rcd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522741	2542207	2542094	278682	278571	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC29B12.06c	ddb1	rcd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522742	2542519	2542094	278977	278571	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC29B12.06c	scs7	rcd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.7686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522743	2542036	2542094	278518	278571	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC29B12.06c	hrq1	rcd1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522744	2541496	2542094	277998	278571	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC29B12.06c	arp42	rcd1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522745	2543263	2541672	279691	278168	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC2F3.15	med6	lsk1	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.9805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522746	3361561	2541672	280637	278168	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC2F3.15	swr1	lsk1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522747	2542135	2541672	278611	278168	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC2F3.15	ubp8	lsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522748	2542277	2541672	278746	278168	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC2F3.15	dbr1	lsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522749	2542168	2541672	278643	278168	SPAC17A5.16	SPAC2F3.15	ftp105	lsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522750	2542421	2541672	278884	278168	SPAC17G8.05	SPAC2F3.15	med20	lsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522751	2542278	2541672	278747	278168	SPAC17G8.07	SPAC2F3.15	yaf9	lsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.9836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522752	2542239	2541672	278711	278168	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC2F3.15	chp1	lsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522753	2542123	2541672	278599	278168	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC2F3.15	mal3	lsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522754	2542831	2541672	279278	278168	SPAC20H4.08	SPAC2F3.15	whi2	lsk1	SPAC20H4.08|SPAC145.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522755	2542032	2541672	278514	278168	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC2F3.15	pnk1	lsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.7175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522756	2541845	2541672	278336	278168	SPAC23G3.08c	SPAC2F3.15	ubp7	lsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522757	2541776	2541672	278270	278168	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC2F3.15	swd1	lsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522758	2541531	2541672	278031	278168	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC2F3.15	fft3	lsk1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522759	2542086	2541672	278563	278168	SPAC25H1.02	SPAC2F3.15	jmj1	lsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522760	2541536	2541889	278036	278379	SPAC1071.02	SPAC2F7.03c	mms19	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522761	2542278	2541889	278747	278379	SPAC17G8.07	SPAC2F7.03c	yaf9	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.0254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522762	2542418	2541889	278881	278379	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC2F7.03c	dad2	pom1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522763	2542239	2541889	278711	278379	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC2F7.03c	chp1	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522764	2542123	2541889	278599	278379	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC2F7.03c	mal3	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522765	2542466	2541889	278927	278379	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC2F7.03c	nup40	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522766	2542126	2541889	278602	278379	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC2F7.03c	not3	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522767	2541929	2541889	278417	278379	SPAC23C4.12	SPAC2F7.03c	hhp2	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522768	2541496	2541889	277998	278379	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC2F7.03c	arp42	pom1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522769	2541789	2541889	278281	278379	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC2F7.03c	iwr1	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522770	2541531	2541889	278031	278379	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC2F7.03c	fft3	pom1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522771	2541672	2541889	278168	278379	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC2F7.03c	lsk1	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522772	2543263	2542516	279691	278974	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC2F7.04	med6	pmc2	pmc5	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.1126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522773	2542421	2542516	278884	278974	SPAC17G8.05	SPAC2F7.04	med20	pmc2	-	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.6795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522774	2542418	2542516	278881	278974	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC2F7.04	dad2	pmc2	hos2	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522775	2542568	2542516	279024	278974	SPAC1952.02	SPAC2F7.04	tma23	pmc2	SPAC1952.02	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522776	2542032	2542516	278514	278974	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC2F7.04	pnk1	pmc2	-	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.1997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522777	2541929	2542516	278417	278974	SPAC23C4.12	SPAC2F7.04	hhp2	pmc2	-	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522778	2543263	2541801	279691	278292	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC2F7.08c	med6	snf5	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522779	2541575	2541801	278072	278292	SPAC12B10.01c	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC12B10.01c	snf5	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522780	2542349	2541801	278814	278292	SPAC1782.05	SPAC2F7.08c	ypa2	snf5	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522781	2542168	2541801	278643	278292	SPAC17A5.16	SPAC2F7.08c	ftp105	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522782	2542207	2541801	278682	278292	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC2F7.08c	ddb1	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522783	2542513	2541801	278971	278292	SPAC1952.05	SPAC2F7.08c	gcn5	snf5	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522784	2542469	2541801	278930	278292	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC2F7.08c	erg5	snf5	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522785	2542462	2541801	278923	278292	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC19B12.11c	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522786	2542519	2541801	278977	278292	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC2F7.08c	scs7	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522787	2542126	2541801	278602	278292	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC2F7.08c	not3	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522788	2541929	2541801	278417	278292	SPAC23C4.12	SPAC2F7.08c	hhp2	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522789	2541496	2541801	277998	278292	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC2F7.08c	arp42	snf5	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522790	2542701	2541801	279154	278292	SPAC26H5.05	SPAC2F7.08c	mga2	snf5	SPAC26H5.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522791	2541614	2541801	278111	278292	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC2F7.08c	elp3	snf5	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522792	2542207	2542008	278682	278491	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC2G11.07c	ddb1	ptc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522793	2542522	2542008	278980	278491	SPAC19A8.03	SPAC2G11.07c	ymr1	ptc3	SPAC19A8.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522794	2542701	2542008	279154	278491	SPAC26H5.05	SPAC2G11.07c	mga2	ptc3	SPAC26H5.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.2691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522795	2542757	2543510	279207	279928	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC30D11.07	mre11	nth1	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.3621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522796	2541643	2543510	278139	279928	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC30D11.07	rad17	nth1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.1383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522797	2542558	2543510	279014	279928	SPAC1952.07	SPAC30D11.07	rad1	nth1	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.2321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522798	2541746	2543510	278240	279928	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC30D11.07	hus1	nth1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.5512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522799	2542007	2543510	278490	279928	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC30D11.07	rad57	nth1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.8686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522800	2541483	2543510	277985	279928	SPAC227.14	SPAC30D11.07	SPAC227.14	nth1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522801	2542168	2543160	278643	279591	SPAC17A5.16	SPAC31A2.14	ftp105	bun107	-	wdr48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522802	2542519	2543160	278977	279591	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC31A2.14	scs7	bun107	-	wdr48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522803	2541929	2543160	278417	279591	SPAC23C4.12	SPAC31A2.14	hhp2	bun107	-	wdr48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522804	2541496	2543160	277998	279591	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC31A2.14	arp42	bun107	arp4	wdr48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522805	2541614	2543160	278111	279591	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC31A2.14	elp3	bun107	kat9	wdr48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522806	2543263	2543078	279691	279511	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC31A2.15c	med6	dcc1	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522807	2541628	2543078	278124	279511	SPAC110.02	SPAC31A2.15c	pds5	dcc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522808	2542111	2543078	278587	279511	SPAC1687.14c	SPAC31A2.15c	SPAC1687.14c	dcc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522809	2542421	2543078	278884	279511	SPAC17G8.05	SPAC31A2.15c	med20	dcc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522810	2542418	2543078	278881	279511	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC31A2.15c	dad2	dcc1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522811	2541943	2543078	278430	279511	SPAC222.07c	SPAC31A2.15c	hri2	dcc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.58	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522812	2541496	2543078	277998	279511	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC31A2.15c	arp42	dcc1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522813	2541672	2543078	278168	279511	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC31A2.15c	lsk1	dcc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522814	2541536	2543190	278036	279619	SPAC1071.02	SPAC31F12.01	mms19	zds1	-	SPAC637.14|mug88	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522815	2542757	2543190	279207	279619	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC31F12.01	mre11	zds1	rad32	SPAC637.14|mug88	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522816	2542300	2543190	278767	279619	SPAC1687.22c	SPAC31F12.01	puf3	zds1	SPAC222.02c	SPAC637.14|mug88	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522817	2542418	2543190	278881	279619	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC31F12.01	dad2	zds1	hos2	SPAC637.14|mug88	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522818	2542123	2543190	278599	279619	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC31F12.01	mal3	zds1	-	SPAC637.14|mug88	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.5001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522819	2542469	2543190	278930	279619	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC31F12.01	erg5	zds1	cyp61	SPAC637.14|mug88	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522820	2542007	2543190	278490	279619	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC31F12.01	rad57	zds1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	SPAC637.14|mug88	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522821	2541786	2543190	278278	279619	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC31F12.01	rok1	zds1	-	SPAC637.14|mug88	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522822	2541871	2543190	278361	279619	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC31F12.01	res2	zds1	mcs1|pct1	SPAC637.14|mug88	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522823	2541845	2543190	278336	279619	SPAC23G3.08c	SPAC31F12.01	ubp7	zds1	-	SPAC637.14|mug88	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522824	2541776	2543190	278270	279619	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC31F12.01	swd1	zds1	-	SPAC637.14|mug88	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522825	2541789	2543190	278281	279619	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC31F12.01	iwr1	zds1	-	SPAC637.14|mug88	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522826	2541614	2543190	278111	279619	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC31F12.01	elp3	zds1	kat9	SPAC637.14|mug88	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.2335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522827	2542094	2543190	278571	279619	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC31F12.01	rcd1	zds1	-	SPAC637.14|mug88	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522828	2543160	2543190	279591	279619	SPAC31A2.14	SPAC31F12.01	bun107	zds1	wdr48	SPAC637.14|mug88	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522829	2542513	2543101	278971	279533	SPAC1952.05	SPAC323.03c	gcn5	SPAC323.03c	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522830	2541801	2543101	278292	279533	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC323.03c	snf5	SPAC323.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.3623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522831	2541580	2542592	278077	279047	SPAC1687.05	SPAC328.01c	pli1	msn5	-	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.6307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522832	2542318	2542592	278784	279047	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC328.01c	cph1	msn5	-	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522833	2542278	2542592	278747	279047	SPAC17G8.07	SPAC328.01c	yaf9	msn5	-	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522834	2542418	2542592	278881	279047	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC328.01c	dad2	msn5	hos2	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522835	2542519	2542592	278977	279047	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC328.01c	scs7	msn5	-	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.6139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522836	2541496	2542592	277998	279047	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC328.01c	arp42	msn5	arp4	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522837	2541776	2542592	278270	279047	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC328.01c	swd1	msn5	-	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.0665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522838	2541531	2542592	278031	279047	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC328.01c	fft3	msn5	snf2SR	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522839	2541614	2542592	278111	279047	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC328.01c	elp3	msn5	kat9	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-18.8431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522840	2543160	2542592	279591	279047	SPAC31A2.14	SPAC328.01c	bun107	msn5	wdr48	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522841	2542421	2543079	278884	279512	SPAC17G8.05	SPAC343.04c	med20	SPAC343.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522842	2541578	2543165	278075	279596	SPAC25B8.05	SPAC343.07	deg1	mug28	SPAC25B8.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522843	2542311	2541710	278777	278205	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC343.11c	dad1	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522844	2542318	2541710	278784	278205	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC343.11c	cph1	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522845	2542421	2541710	278884	278205	SPAC17G8.05	SPAC343.11c	med20	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.3139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522846	2542418	2541710	278881	278205	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC343.11c	dad2	msc1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.7381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522847	2542541	2541710	278998	278205	SPAC1B3.03c	SPAC343.11c	wis2	msc1	cyp5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522848	2541899	2541710	278389	278205	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC343.11c	set3	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522849	2541496	2541710	277998	278205	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC343.11c	arp42	msc1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522850	2541776	2541710	278270	278205	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC343.11c	swd1	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522851	2542701	2541710	279154	278205	SPAC26H5.05	SPAC343.11c	mga2	msc1	SPAC26H5.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522852	2542168	2543106	278643	279538	SPAC17A5.16	SPAC3A11.13	ftp105	SPAC3A11.13	-	SPAC3H5.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522853	2542418	2543106	278881	279538	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC3A11.13	dad2	SPAC3A11.13	hos2	SPAC3H5.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522854	2542568	2543106	279024	279538	SPAC1952.02	SPAC3A11.13	tma23	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC1952.02	SPAC3H5.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522855	2541786	2543106	278278	279538	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC3A11.13	rok1	SPAC3A11.13	-	SPAC3H5.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522856	2541531	2543106	278031	279538	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3A11.13	fft3	SPAC3A11.13	snf2SR	SPAC3H5.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522857	2542568	2541713	279024	278208	SPAC1952.02	SPAC3A12.12	tma23	atp11	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522858	2542462	2541713	278923	278208	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC19B12.11c	atp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522859	2541786	2541713	278278	278208	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC3A12.12	rok1	atp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522860	2542032	2541713	278514	278208	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC3A12.12	pnk1	atp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522861	2541578	2541713	278075	278208	SPAC25B8.05	SPAC3A12.12	deg1	atp11	SPAC25B8.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522862	2542701	2541713	279154	278208	SPAC26H5.05	SPAC3A12.12	mga2	atp11	SPAC26H5.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522863	2541614	2541713	278111	278208	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC3A12.12	elp3	atp11	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522864	2542008	2541713	278491	278208	SPAC2G11.07c	SPAC3A12.12	ptc3	atp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522865	2542592	2541713	279047	278208	SPAC328.01c	SPAC3A12.12	msn5	atp11	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522866	2542701	3361512	279154	280588	SPAC26H5.05	SPAC3C7.01c	mga2	sac12	SPAC26H5.05	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.4543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522867	2542418	2543044	278881	279479	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC3C7.12	dad2	tip1	hos2	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522868	2542513	2543044	278971	279479	SPAC1952.05	SPAC3C7.12	gcn5	tip1	kat2	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522869	3361533	2543044	280609	279479	SPAC222.15	SPAC3C7.12	meu13	tip1	SPAC821.01	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522870	2541871	2543044	278361	279479	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC3C7.12	res2	tip1	mcs1|pct1	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.1446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522871	2541614	2543044	278111	279479	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC3C7.12	elp3	tip1	kat9	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522872	2543190	2543044	279619	279479	SPAC31F12.01	SPAC3C7.12	zds1	tip1	SPAC637.14|mug88	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522873	2542135	2543064	278611	279497	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC3G6.01	ubp8	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522874	2542318	2543064	278784	279497	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC3G6.01	cph1	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.9681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522875	2542349	2543064	278814	279497	SPAC1782.05	SPAC3G6.01	ypa2	hrp3	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522876	2542170	2543064	278645	279497	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC3G6.01	mst2	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522877	2542519	2543064	278977	279497	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC3G6.01	scs7	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.0636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522878	2541871	2543064	278361	279497	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC3G6.01	res2	hrp3	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.9685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522879	2541496	2543064	277998	279497	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC3G6.01	arp42	hrp3	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-23.0274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522880	2541776	2543064	278270	279497	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC3G6.01	swd1	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.9076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522881	2541531	2543064	278031	279497	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3G6.01	fft3	hrp3	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522882	2541889	2543064	278379	279497	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC3G6.01	pom1	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522883	2541801	2543064	278292	279497	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC3G6.01	snf5	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522884	2542592	2543064	279047	279497	SPAC328.01c	SPAC3G6.01	msn5	hrp3	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522885	2542757	2543164	279207	279595	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC3G6.06c	mre11	rad2	rad32	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.5908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522886	2542170	2543164	278645	279595	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC3G6.06c	mst2	rad2	-	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522887	2541746	2543164	278240	279595	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC3G6.06c	hus1	rad2	-	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522888	2542007	2543164	278490	279595	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC3G6.06c	rad57	rad2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.9457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522889	2541871	2543164	278361	279595	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC3G6.06c	res2	rad2	mcs1|pct1	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522890	2542036	2543164	278518	279595	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC3G6.06c	hrq1	rad2	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522891	2542032	2543164	278514	279595	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC3G6.06c	pnk1	rad2	-	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.6545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522892	2541496	2543164	277998	279595	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC3G6.06c	arp42	rad2	arp4	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522893	2541496	2543109	277998	279541	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC3G6.09c	arp42	tps2	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522894	2541496	2543118	277998	279550	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC3G6.11	arp42	chl1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522895	2543078	2543118	279511	279550	SPAC31A2.15c	SPAC3G6.11	dcc1	chl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-20.6207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522896	2543263	2543452	279691	279872	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC3G9.04	med6	ssu72	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.3522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522897	2541536	2543452	278036	279872	SPAC1071.02	SPAC3G9.04	mms19	ssu72	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.7773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522898	3361561	2543452	280637	279872	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC3G9.04	swr1	ssu72	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.5175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522899	5802929	2543452	858067	279872	SPAC1556.08c	SPAC3G9.04	cbs2	ssu72	SPAC1F12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522900	2542277	2543452	278746	279872	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC3G9.04	dbr1	ssu72	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522901	2542168	2543452	278643	279872	SPAC17A5.16	SPAC3G9.04	ftp105	ssu72	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522902	2542421	2543452	278884	279872	SPAC17G8.05	SPAC3G9.04	med20	ssu72	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.1308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522903	2542278	2543452	278747	279872	SPAC17G8.07	SPAC3G9.04	yaf9	ssu72	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-19.3297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522904	2542207	2543452	278682	279872	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC3G9.04	ddb1	ssu72	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522905	2542462	2543452	278923	279872	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC19B12.11c	ssu72	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522906	2542126	2543452	278602	279872	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC3G9.04	not3	ssu72	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522907	2541899	2543452	278389	279872	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC3G9.04	set3	ssu72	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.9047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522908	2542032	2543452	278514	279872	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC3G9.04	pnk1	ssu72	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.6454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522909	2541496	2543452	277998	279872	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC3G9.04	arp42	ssu72	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.8903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522910	2541531	2543452	278031	279872	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3G9.04	fft3	ssu72	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.7295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522911	2542701	2543452	279154	279872	SPAC26H5.05	SPAC3G9.04	mga2	ssu72	SPAC26H5.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522912	2541889	2543452	278379	279872	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC3G9.04	pom1	ssu72	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522913	2542516	2543452	278974	279872	SPAC2F7.04	SPAC3G9.04	pmc2	ssu72	med1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522914	2543190	2543452	279619	279872	SPAC31F12.01	SPAC3G9.04	zds1	ssu72	SPAC637.14|mug88	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522915	2541710	2543452	278205	279872	SPAC343.11c	SPAC3G9.04	msc1	ssu72	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522916	2543263	2543643	279691	280057	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC3G9.07c	med6	hos2	pmc5	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.0057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522917	2541536	2543643	278036	280057	SPAC1071.02	SPAC3G9.07c	mms19	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.0614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522918	3361561	2543643	280637	280057	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC3G9.07c	swr1	hos2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522919	2542277	2543643	278746	280057	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC3G9.07c	dbr1	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522920	2542421	2543643	278884	280057	SPAC17G8.05	SPAC3G9.07c	med20	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.8709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522921	2542278	2543643	278747	280057	SPAC17G8.07	SPAC3G9.07c	yaf9	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.2447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522922	2542170	2543643	278645	280057	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC3G9.07c	mst2	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522923	2542568	2543643	279024	280057	SPAC1952.02	SPAC3G9.07c	tma23	hos2	SPAC1952.02	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522924	2542469	2543643	278930	280057	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC3G9.07c	erg5	hos2	cyp61	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522925	2542032	2543643	278514	280057	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC3G9.07c	pnk1	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522926	2541496	2543643	277998	280057	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC3G9.07c	arp42	hos2	arp4	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.3801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522927	2541531	2543643	278031	280057	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3G9.07c	fft3	hos2	snf2SR	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.3763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522928	2541578	2543643	278075	280057	SPAC25B8.05	SPAC3G9.07c	deg1	hos2	SPAC25B8.05	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522929	2541614	2543643	278111	280057	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC3G9.07c	elp3	hos2	kat9	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522930	2541801	2543643	278292	280057	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC3G9.07c	snf5	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522931	2542701	2543399	279154	279821	SPAC26H5.05	SPAC3G9.12	mga2	peg1	SPAC26H5.05	cls1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.42	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522932	2541536	2543443	278036	279863	SPAC1071.02	SPAC3H1.12c	mms19	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522933	3361561	2543443	280637	279863	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC3H1.12c	swr1	snt2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-23.8862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522934	2541818	2543443	278309	279863	SPAC11G7.02	SPAC3H1.12c	pub1	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522935	2542311	2543443	278777	279863	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC3H1.12c	dad1	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522936	2542318	2543443	278784	279863	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC3H1.12c	cph1	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522937	2542418	2543443	278881	279863	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC3H1.12c	dad2	snt2	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.2511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522938	2542522	2543443	278980	279863	SPAC19A8.03	SPAC3H1.12c	ymr1	snt2	SPAC19A8.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522939	2542469	2543443	278930	279863	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC3H1.12c	erg5	snt2	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522940	2542126	2543443	278602	279863	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC3H1.12c	not3	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522941	2541899	2543443	278389	279863	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC3H1.12c	set3	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.3928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522942	2541496	2543443	277998	279863	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC3H1.12c	arp42	snt2	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522943	2541776	2543443	278270	279863	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC3H1.12c	swd1	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522944	2541578	2543443	278075	279863	SPAC25B8.05	SPAC3H1.12c	deg1	snt2	SPAC25B8.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522945	2541672	2543443	278168	279863	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC3H1.12c	lsk1	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522946	2543452	2543443	279872	279863	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC3H1.12c	ssu72	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.9836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522947	2543643	2543443	280057	279863	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC3H1.12c	hos2	snt2	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522948	2541628	2543378	278124	279800	SPAC110.02	SPAC3H8.07c	pds5	pac10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522949	2542418	2543378	278881	279800	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC3H8.07c	dad2	pac10	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522950	2542237	2543378	278709	279800	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC3H8.07c	fin1	pac10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522951	2541531	2543378	278031	279800	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3H8.07c	fft3	pac10	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.1658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522952	2542701	2543378	279154	279800	SPAC26H5.05	SPAC3H8.07c	mga2	pac10	SPAC26H5.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522953	2543510	2543378	279928	279800	SPAC30D11.07	SPAC3H8.07c	nth1	pac10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522954	2542662	2543338	279115	279761	SPAC25B8.07c	SPAC458.06	SPAC25B8.07c	atg1803	-	SPAC458.06|atg18|atg18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522955	3361512	2543338	280588	279761	SPAC3C7.01c	SPAC458.06	sac12	atg1803	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	SPAC458.06|atg18|atg18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522956	2541889	2543576	278379	279991	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC4A8.05c	pom1	myp2	-	myo3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522957	2542318	2543616	278784	280030	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC4A8.09c	cph1	cwf21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.7986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522958	2542459	2543616	278920	280030	SPAC1D4.03c	SPAC4A8.09c	aut12	cwf21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522959	2541871	2543616	278361	280030	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC4A8.09c	res2	cwf21	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522960	2541496	2543616	277998	280030	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC4A8.09c	arp42	cwf21	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522961	2542094	2543616	278571	280030	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC4A8.09c	rcd1	cwf21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522962	2541801	2543616	278292	280030	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC4A8.09c	snf5	cwf21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522963	2541710	2543616	278205	280030	SPAC343.11c	SPAC4A8.09c	msc1	cwf21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522964	2543064	2543616	279497	280030	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC4A8.09c	hrp3	cwf21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.0677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522965	2543452	2543616	279872	280030	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC4A8.09c	ssu72	cwf21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522966	2543643	2543616	280057	280030	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC4A8.09c	hos2	cwf21	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522967	2543443	2543616	279863	280030	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC4A8.09c	snt2	cwf21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522968	2542757	2543529	279207	279947	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC4C5.02c	mre11	ryh1	rad32	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522969	2542409	2543529	278873	279947	SPAC17G8.10c	SPAC4C5.02c	dma1	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522970	2542239	2543529	278711	279947	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC4C5.02c	chp1	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522971	2542123	2543529	278599	279947	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC4C5.02c	mal3	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522972	2542023	2543529	278506	279947	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC4C5.02c	ufd2	ryh1	SPAC145.04	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522973	2541899	2543529	278389	279947	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC4C5.02c	set3	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522974	2541885	2543529	278375	279947	SPAC22H10.03c	SPAC4C5.02c	kap114	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522975	2541856	2543529	278347	279947	SPAC23H3.08c	SPAC4C5.02c	bub3	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522976	2542298	2543529	278765	279947	SPAC29A4.02c	SPAC4C5.02c	SPAC29A4.02c	ryh1	tef3	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.62	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522977	2543263	2543619	279691	280033	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC4F10.04	med6	ypa1	pmc5	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522978	2541628	2543619	278124	280033	SPAC110.02	SPAC4F10.04	pds5	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522979	2542318	2543619	278784	280033	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC4F10.04	cph1	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522980	2542421	2543619	278884	280033	SPAC17G8.05	SPAC4F10.04	med20	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522981	2542170	2543619	278645	280033	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC4F10.04	mst2	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522982	2542469	2543619	278930	280033	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC4F10.04	erg5	ypa1	cyp61	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522983	2542237	2543619	278709	280033	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC4F10.04	fin1	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.4099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522984	2542519	2543619	278977	280033	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC4F10.04	scs7	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522985	2542459	2543619	278920	280033	SPAC1D4.03c	SPAC4F10.04	aut12	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.3072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522986	2541776	2543619	278270	280033	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC4F10.04	swd1	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522987	2541531	2543619	278031	280033	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC4F10.04	fft3	ypa1	snf2SR	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522988	2541578	2543619	278075	280033	SPAC25B8.05	SPAC4F10.04	deg1	ypa1	SPAC25B8.05	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522989	2543160	2543619	279591	280033	SPAC31A2.14	SPAC4F10.04	bun107	ypa1	wdr48	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522990	2543064	2543619	279497	280033	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC4F10.04	hrp3	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.8426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522991	2543616	2543619	280030	280033	SPAC4A8.09c	SPAC4F10.04	cwf21	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522992	2543263	2543516	279691	279934	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC4F10.11	med6	spn1	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522993	2541536	2543516	278036	279934	SPAC1071.02	SPAC4F10.11	mms19	spn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522994	2542421	2543516	278884	279934	SPAC17G8.05	SPAC4F10.11	med20	spn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522995	2542418	2543516	278881	279934	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC4F10.11	dad2	spn1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522996	2542123	2543516	278599	279934	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC4F10.11	mal3	spn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522997	2541776	2543516	278270	279934	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC4F10.11	swd1	spn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522998	2542094	2543516	278571	279934	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC4F10.11	rcd1	spn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
522999	2541801	2543516	278292	279934	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC4F10.11	snf5	spn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523000	2543044	2543516	279479	279934	SPAC3C7.12	SPAC4F10.11	tip1	spn1	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523001	2543263	2543592	279691	280007	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC4F10.18	med6	nup37	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523002	2542421	2543432	278884	279852	SPAC17G8.05	SPAC4G8.05	med20	ppk14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523003	2542513	2543432	278971	279852	SPAC1952.05	SPAC4G8.05	gcn5	ppk14	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523004	2542757	2541542	279207	278042	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC4G9.02	mre11	rnh201	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523005	2541889	2541542	278379	278042	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC4G9.02	pom1	rnh201	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523006	2541801	2543385	278292	279807	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC4G9.12	snf5	SPAC4G9.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523007	2542311	2543667	278777	280081	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC4H3.02c	dad1	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523008	2542421	2543667	278884	280081	SPAC17G8.05	SPAC4H3.02c	med20	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523009	2542418	2543667	278881	280081	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC4H3.02c	dad2	swc3	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.9808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523010	2543443	2543667	279863	280081	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC4H3.02c	snt2	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.3538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523011	2542757	2543577	279207	279992	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC4H3.05	mre11	srs2	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523012	2542418	2543577	278881	279992	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC4H3.05	dad2	srs2	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523013	2541786	2543577	278278	279992	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC4H3.05	rok1	srs2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523014	2541871	2543577	278361	279992	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC4H3.05	res2	srs2	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523015	2542032	2543577	278514	279992	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC4H3.05	pnk1	srs2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.5217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523016	2542541	2543423	278998	279844	SPAC1B3.03c	SPAC4H3.07c	wis2	SPAC4H3.07c	cyp5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523017	2543516	2543423	279934	279844	SPAC4F10.11	SPAC4H3.07c	spn1	SPAC4H3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523018	3361478	3361477	280554	280553	SPAC13A11.06	SPAC56F8.08	SPAC13A11.06	mud1	SPAC3H8.01	ddi1|ucp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523019	2542519	3361477	278977	280553	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC56F8.08	scs7	mud1	-	ddi1|ucp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523020	2542516	3361477	278974	280553	SPAC2F7.04	SPAC56F8.08	pmc2	mud1	med1	ddi1|ucp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523021	2541801	3361477	278292	280553	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC56F8.08	snf5	mud1	-	ddi1|ucp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523022	2543378	3361477	279800	280553	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAC56F8.08	pac10	mud1	-	ddi1|ucp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523023	2542318	2542878	278784	279323	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC57A10.09c	cph1	nhp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523024	2542418	2542878	278881	279323	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC57A10.09c	dad2	nhp6	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523025	2542032	2542878	278514	279323	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC57A10.09c	pnk1	nhp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523026	2542363	2542571	278827	279027	SPAC1783.05	SPAC589.02c	hrp1	med13	chd1	spTrap240|srb9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.9075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523027	2542462	2542571	278923	279027	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC589.02c	SPAC19B12.11c	med13	-	spTrap240|srb9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523028	2541871	2542571	278361	279027	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC589.02c	res2	med13	mcs1|pct1	spTrap240|srb9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523029	2543101	2542571	279533	279027	SPAC323.03c	SPAC589.02c	SPAC323.03c	med13	-	spTrap240|srb9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523030	2542764	2542180	279214	278655	SPAC15E1.10	SPAC589.07c	SPAC15E1.10	atg1801	SPAP7G5.01	atg18|atg18a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523031	2542278	2542180	278747	278655	SPAC17G8.07	SPAC589.07c	yaf9	atg1801	-	atg18|atg18a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523032	2541438	2543381	277943	279803	SPAC23G3.10c	SPAC630.09c	ssr3	mug58	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523033	2541536	2543426	278036	279846	SPAC1071.02	SPAC631.02	mms19	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.0125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523034	3361561	2543426	280637	279846	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC631.02	swr1	bdf2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523035	2542311	2543426	278777	279846	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC631.02	dad1	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523036	2542318	2543426	278784	279846	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC631.02	cph1	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.3305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523037	2542418	2543426	278881	279846	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC631.02	dad2	bdf2	hos2	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.9084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523038	2542513	2543426	278971	279846	SPAC1952.05	SPAC631.02	gcn5	bdf2	kat2	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.3126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523039	2542237	2543426	278709	279846	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC631.02	fin1	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523040	2542126	2543426	278602	279846	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC631.02	not3	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523041	2542459	2543426	278920	279846	SPAC1D4.03c	SPAC631.02	aut12	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523042	2541899	2543426	278389	279846	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC631.02	set3	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523043	2541786	2543426	278278	279846	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC631.02	rok1	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523044	2541496	2543426	277998	279846	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC631.02	arp42	bdf2	arp4	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.0078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523045	2541672	2543426	278168	279846	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC631.02	lsk1	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.65	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523046	2542516	2543426	278974	279846	SPAC2F7.04	SPAC631.02	pmc2	bdf2	med1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.3345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523047	2543106	2543426	279538	279846	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC631.02	SPAC3A11.13	bdf2	SPAC3H5.02	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523048	2543452	2543426	279872	279846	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC631.02	ssu72	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523049	2543643	2543426	280057	279846	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC631.02	hos2	bdf2	hda1|phd1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523050	2543378	2543426	279800	279846	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAC631.02	pac10	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523051	2541642	2543384	278138	279806	SPAC10F6.05c	SPAC637.06	ubc6	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523052	2542135	2543384	278611	279806	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC637.06	ubp8	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523053	3361478	2543384	280554	279806	SPAC13A11.06	SPAC637.06	SPAC13A11.06	gmh5	SPAC3H8.01	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523054	2542770	2543384	279220	279806	SPAC167.07c	SPAC637.06	hul5	gmh5	SPAC167.07c|SPAC57A7.03c	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523055	2542418	2543384	278881	279806	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC637.06	dad2	gmh5	hos2	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523056	2542522	2543384	278980	279806	SPAC19A8.03	SPAC637.06	ymr1	gmh5	SPAC19A8.03	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523057	2541461	2543384	277963	279806	SPAC1F3.09	SPAC637.06	mug161	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523058	2541845	2543384	278336	279806	SPAC23G3.08c	SPAC637.06	ubp7	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523059	2542087	2543384	278564	279806	SPAC26F1.02	SPAC637.06	pnn1	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523060	3361477	2543384	280553	279806	SPAC56F8.08	SPAC637.06	mud1	gmh5	ddi1|ucp1	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523061	2543381	2543384	279803	279806	SPAC630.09c	SPAC637.06	mug58	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523062	2542757	2543661	279207	280075	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC644.08	mre11	SPAC644.08	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523063	2542925	2543580	279366	279995	SPAC11E3.04c	SPAC644.14c	ubc13	rad51	spu13|sst5	rhp51	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523064	2540106	2543580	276643	279995	SPBC12D12.09	SPAC644.14c	rev7	rad51	SPAC12D12.09	rhp51	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.2168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523065	3361391	2543580	280467	279995	SPAC13G6.01c	SPAC644.14c	rad8	rad51	SPAC5H10.14c	rhp51	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.5704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523066	2541643	2543580	278139	279995	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC644.14c	rad17	rad51	-	rhp51	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.9351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523067	2541580	2543580	278077	279995	SPAC1687.05	SPAC644.14c	pli1	rad51	-	rhp51	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.2355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523068	2542318	2543580	278784	279995	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC644.14c	cph1	rad51	-	rhp51	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523069	2542150	2543580	278626	279995	SPAC17A5.11	SPAC644.14c	rec12	rad51	spo11	rhp51	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523070	2542513	2543580	278971	279995	SPAC1952.05	SPAC644.14c	gcn5	rad51	kat2	rhp51	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523071	2541746	2543580	278240	279995	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC644.14c	hus1	rad51	-	rhp51	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.2496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523072	2541941	2543580	278428	279995	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC644.14c	tfs1	rad51	-	rhp51	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523073	2542014	2543580	278497	279995	SPAC20H4.04	SPAC644.14c	fml2	rad51	mfh2	rhp51	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523074	2542023	2543580	278506	279995	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC644.14c	ufd2	rad51	SPAC145.04	rhp51	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523075	2541871	2543580	278361	279995	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC644.14c	res2	rad51	mcs1|pct1	rhp51	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523076	2542036	2543580	278518	279995	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC644.14c	hrq1	rad51	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	rhp51	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.5025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523077	2541496	2543580	277998	279995	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC644.14c	arp42	rad51	arp4	rhp51	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.0305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523078	2541531	2543580	278031	279995	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC644.14c	fft3	rad51	snf2SR	rhp51	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.3019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523079	2542071	2543580	278548	279995	SPAC26H5.03	SPAC644.14c	pcf2	rad51	cac2	rhp51	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.2547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523080	2541672	2543580	278168	279995	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC644.14c	lsk1	rad51	-	rhp51	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523081	2541801	2543580	278292	279995	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC644.14c	snf5	rad51	-	rhp51	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523082	2543510	2543580	279928	279995	SPAC30D11.07	SPAC644.14c	nth1	rad51	-	rhp51	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.9272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523083	2543044	2543580	279479	279995	SPAC3C7.12	SPAC644.14c	tip1	rad51	noc1	rhp51	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523084	2543164	2543580	279595	279995	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC644.14c	rad2	rad51	fen1	rhp51	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.4823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523085	2543516	2543580	279934	279995	SPAC4F10.11	SPAC644.14c	spn1	rad51	-	rhp51	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523086	2543423	2543580	279844	279995	SPAC4H3.07c	SPAC644.14c	SPAC4H3.07c	rad51	-	rhp51	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523087	2542757	2541633	279207	278129	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC664.01c	mre11	swi6	rad32	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.4168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523088	2542788	2541633	279237	278129	SPAC15A10.15	SPAC664.01c	sgo2	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.7592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523089	2542318	2541633	278784	278129	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC664.01c	cph1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.0238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523090	2542418	2541633	278881	278129	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC664.01c	dad2	swi6	hos2	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523091	2542239	2541633	278711	278129	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC664.01c	chp1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523092	2542123	2541633	278599	278129	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC664.01c	mal3	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523093	2541496	2541633	277998	278129	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC664.01c	arp42	swi6	arp4	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.6105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523094	2541856	2541633	278347	278129	SPAC23H3.08c	SPAC664.01c	bub3	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523095	2541614	2541633	278111	278129	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC664.01c	elp3	swi6	kat9	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523096	2541672	2541633	278168	278129	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC664.01c	lsk1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523097	2543118	2541633	279550	278129	SPAC3G6.11	SPAC664.01c	chl1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523098	2543619	2541633	280033	278129	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC664.01c	ypa1	swi6	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.0101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523099	2543580	2541633	279995	278129	SPAC644.14c	SPAC664.01c	rad51	swi6	rhp51	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523100	2541536	2543563	278036	279979	SPAC1071.02	SPAC664.02c	mms19	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.7175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523101	3361561	2543563	280637	279979	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC664.02c	swr1	arp8	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.8604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523102	2542757	2543563	279207	279979	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC664.02c	mre11	arp8	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523103	2542318	2543563	278784	279979	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC664.02c	cph1	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-24.7626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523104	2542278	2543563	278747	279979	SPAC17G8.07	SPAC664.02c	yaf9	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-20.0398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523105	2542418	2543563	278881	279979	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC664.02c	dad2	arp8	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-18.0916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523106	2542123	2543563	278599	279979	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC664.02c	mal3	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523107	2542462	2543563	278923	279979	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC664.02c	SPAC19B12.11c	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523108	2542519	2543563	278977	279979	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC664.02c	scs7	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523109	2542126	2543563	278602	279979	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC664.02c	not3	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523110	2541899	2543563	278389	279979	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC664.02c	set3	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.2393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523111	2541776	2543563	278270	279979	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC664.02c	swd1	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.6209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523112	2541614	2543563	278111	279979	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC664.02c	elp3	arp8	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523113	2541889	2543563	278379	279979	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC664.02c	pom1	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523114	2543190	2543563	279619	279979	SPAC31F12.01	SPAC664.02c	zds1	arp8	SPAC637.14|mug88	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523115	2543106	2543563	279538	279979	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC664.02c	SPAC3A11.13	arp8	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523116	2543064	2543563	279497	279979	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC664.02c	hrp3	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-21.3958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523117	2543452	2543563	279872	279979	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC664.02c	ssu72	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523118	2543643	2543563	280057	279979	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC664.02c	hos2	arp8	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.8419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523119	2543378	2543563	279800	279979	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAC664.02c	pac10	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523120	2543619	2543563	280033	279979	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC664.02c	ypa1	arp8	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523121	2543667	2543563	280081	279979	SPAC4H3.02c	SPAC664.02c	swc3	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523122	2543580	2543563	279995	279979	SPAC644.14c	SPAC664.02c	rad51	arp8	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523123	2542757	2543544	279207	279961	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC664.07c	mre11	rad9	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.3836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523124	2542036	2543544	278518	279961	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC664.07c	hrq1	rad9	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-21.5657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523125	2541656	2543544	278152	279961	SPAC25H1.06	SPAC664.07c	pcf3	rad9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523126	2542071	2543544	278548	279961	SPAC26H5.03	SPAC664.07c	pcf2	rad9	cac2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523127	2543510	2543544	279928	279961	SPAC30D11.07	SPAC664.07c	nth1	rad9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523128	2543164	2543544	279595	279961	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC664.07c	rad2	rad9	fen1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523129	2541542	2543544	278042	279961	SPAC4G9.02	SPAC664.07c	rnh201	rad9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523130	2543580	2543544	279995	279961	SPAC644.14c	SPAC664.07c	rad51	rad9	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.7493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523131	2542007	2543358	278490	279780	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC688.10	rad57	rev3	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523132	2541672	2543358	278168	279780	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC688.10	lsk1	rev3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523133	2542757	2543240	279207	279668	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC694.06c	mre11	mrc1	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.2507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523134	2541643	2543240	278139	279668	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC694.06c	rad17	mrc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523135	2542318	2543240	278784	279668	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC694.06c	cph1	mrc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523136	2542278	2543240	278747	279668	SPAC17G8.07	SPAC694.06c	yaf9	mrc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523137	2542418	2543240	278881	279668	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC694.06c	dad2	mrc1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523138	2542239	2543240	278711	279668	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC694.06c	chp1	mrc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.6485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523139	2541746	2543240	278240	279668	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC694.06c	hus1	mrc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523140	2541531	2543240	278031	279668	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC694.06c	fft3	mrc1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523141	2541801	2543240	278292	279668	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC694.06c	snf5	mrc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523142	2543078	2543240	279511	279668	SPAC31A2.15c	SPAC694.06c	dcc1	mrc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523143	2543064	2543240	279497	279668	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC694.06c	hrp3	mrc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523144	2543619	2543240	280033	279668	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC694.06c	ypa1	mrc1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523145	2541633	2543240	278129	279668	SPAC664.01c	SPAC694.06c	swi6	mrc1	SPAC824.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.2085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523146	2543563	2543240	279979	279668	SPAC664.02c	SPAC694.06c	arp8	mrc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523147	2543263	2543226	279691	279654	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC6B12.05c	med6	ies2	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523148	2542300	2543226	278767	279654	SPAC1687.22c	SPAC6B12.05c	puf3	ies2	SPAC222.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523149	2542318	2543226	278784	279654	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC6B12.05c	cph1	ies2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-22.2407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523150	2542277	2543226	278746	279654	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC6B12.05c	dbr1	ies2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523151	2542519	2543226	278977	279654	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC6B12.05c	scs7	ies2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523152	2543064	2543226	279497	279654	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC6B12.05c	hrp3	ies2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523153	2543563	2543226	279979	279654	SPAC664.02c	SPAC6B12.05c	arp8	ies2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.9974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523154	2541536	2543319	278036	279743	SPAC1071.02	SPAC6B12.09	mms19	trm10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523155	2541643	2543319	278139	279743	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC6B12.09	rad17	trm10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.4118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523156	2542311	2543319	278777	279743	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC6B12.09	dad1	trm10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523157	2542168	2543319	278643	279743	SPAC17A5.16	SPAC6B12.09	ftp105	trm10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523158	2542558	2543319	279014	279743	SPAC1952.07	SPAC6B12.09	rad1	trm10	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.9407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523159	2542126	2543319	278602	279743	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC6B12.09	not3	trm10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523160	2541746	2543319	278240	279743	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC6B12.09	hus1	trm10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.6456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523161	2541496	2543319	277998	279743	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC6B12.09	arp42	trm10	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523162	2542592	2543319	279047	279743	SPAC328.01c	SPAC6B12.09	msn5	trm10	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523163	2543106	2543319	279538	279743	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC3A11.13	trm10	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523164	2543563	2543319	279979	279743	SPAC664.02c	SPAC6B12.09	arp8	trm10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.9684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523165	2543544	2543319	279961	279743	SPAC664.07c	SPAC6B12.09	rad9	trm10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.7602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523166	2543240	2543319	279668	279743	SPAC694.06c	SPAC6B12.09	mrc1	trm10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.6853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523167	5802929	2543214	858067	279643	SPAC1556.08c	SPAC6F12.06	cbs2	SPAC6F12.06	SPAC1F12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523168	2542032	2543214	278514	279643	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC6F12.06	pnk1	SPAC6F12.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523169	2542757	2542198	279207	278673	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC6F12.09	mre11	rdp1	rad32	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523170	2542311	2542198	278777	278673	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC6F12.09	dad1	rdp1	-	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523171	2542318	2542198	278784	278673	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC6F12.09	cph1	rdp1	-	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.6861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523172	2542418	2542198	278881	278673	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC6F12.09	dad2	rdp1	hos2	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523173	2542467	2542198	278928	278673	SPAC1834.04	SPAC6F12.09	hht1	rdp1	-	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523174	2542123	2542198	278599	278673	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC6F12.09	mal3	rdp1	-	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.52	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523175	2542519	2542198	278977	278673	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC6F12.09	scs7	rdp1	-	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523176	2542023	2542198	278506	278673	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC6F12.09	ufd2	rdp1	SPAC145.04	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523177	2541786	2542198	278278	278673	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC6F12.09	rok1	rdp1	-	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523178	2541496	2542198	277998	278673	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC6F12.09	arp42	rdp1	arp4	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523179	2541531	2542198	278031	278673	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC6F12.09	fft3	rdp1	snf2SR	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523180	2542736	2542198	279186	278673	SPAC25G10.02	SPAC6F12.09	cce1	rdp1	ydc2	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523181	2541614	2542198	278111	278673	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC6F12.09	elp3	rdp1	kat9	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523182	2543044	2542198	279479	278673	SPAC3C7.12	SPAC6F12.09	tip1	rdp1	noc1	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523183	2541628	2542891	278124	279335	SPAC110.02	SPAC6F12.12	pds5	par2	-	pbp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523184	2543580	2542891	279995	279335	SPAC644.14c	SPAC6F12.12	rad51	par2	rhp51	pbp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523185	5802929	2542055	858067	278534	SPAC1556.08c	SPAC6G9.03c	cbs2	mug183	SPAC1F12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523186	2542519	2542055	278977	278534	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC6G9.03c	scs7	mug183	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523187	2542757	2541819	279207	278310	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC6G9.08	mre11	ubp6	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523188	2542568	2541819	279024	278310	SPAC1952.02	SPAC6G9.08	tma23	ubp6	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523189	2542519	2541819	278977	278310	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC6G9.08	scs7	ubp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523190	2542126	2541819	278602	278310	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC6G9.08	not3	ubp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523191	2542007	2541819	278490	278310	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC6G9.08	rad57	ubp6	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523192	2541871	2541819	278361	278310	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC6G9.08	res2	ubp6	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523193	2542036	2541819	278518	278310	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC6G9.08	hrq1	ubp6	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523194	2541529	2543111	278029	279543	SPAC1687.13c	SPAC806.07	csn5	ndk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523195	2542318	2543117	278784	279549	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC806.08c	cph1	mod21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523196	2542418	2543117	278881	279549	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC806.08c	dad2	mod21	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523197	2542237	2543117	278709	279549	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC806.08c	fin1	mod21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523198	2543432	2543117	279852	279549	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC806.08c	ppk14	mod21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523199	2542421	2543513	278884	279931	SPAC17G8.05	SPAC821.06	med20	spn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523200	2543078	2543513	279511	279931	SPAC31A2.15c	SPAC821.06	dcc1	spn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523201	2541871	2542228	278361	278701	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC823.03	res2	ppk15	mcs1|pct1	SPAC1E11.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523202	2542513	2543317	278971	279741	SPAC1952.05	SPAC823.14	gcn5	ptf1	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523203	2542701	2543317	279154	279741	SPAC26H5.05	SPAC823.14	mga2	ptf1	SPAC26H5.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523204	2542516	2543317	278974	279741	SPAC2F7.04	SPAC823.14	pmc2	ptf1	med1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523205	2541536	2542845	278036	279291	SPAC1071.02	SPAC824.04	mms19	SPAC824.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.6894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523206	3361561	2542845	280637	279291	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC824.04	swr1	SPAC824.04	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523207	2542278	2542845	278747	279291	SPAC17G8.07	SPAC824.04	yaf9	SPAC824.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523208	2542170	2542845	278645	279291	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC824.04	mst2	SPAC824.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523209	2542239	2542845	278711	279291	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC824.04	chp1	SPAC824.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523210	2542519	2542845	278977	279291	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC824.04	scs7	SPAC824.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.1294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523211	2542126	2542845	278602	279291	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC824.04	not3	SPAC824.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523212	2541899	2542845	278389	279291	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC824.04	set3	SPAC824.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523213	2541871	2542845	278361	279291	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC824.04	res2	SPAC824.04	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523214	2542036	2542845	278518	279291	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC824.04	hrq1	SPAC824.04	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.5407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523215	2541496	2542845	277998	279291	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC824.04	arp42	SPAC824.04	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.8443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523216	2541845	2542845	278336	279291	SPAC23G3.08c	SPAC824.04	ubp7	SPAC824.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523217	2541614	2542845	278111	279291	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC824.04	elp3	SPAC824.04	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523218	2541672	2542845	278168	279291	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC824.04	lsk1	SPAC824.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.1866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523219	2543452	2542845	279872	279291	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC824.04	ssu72	SPAC824.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-18.4092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523220	2543643	2542845	280057	279291	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC824.04	hos2	SPAC824.04	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.8773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523221	2543616	2542845	280030	279291	SPAC4A8.09c	SPAC824.04	cwf21	SPAC824.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523222	2542141	2543567	278617	279983	SPAC17C9.05c	SPAC890.03	pmc3	ppk16	med27|prk1	mug92	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523223	2542278	2543567	278747	279983	SPAC17G8.07	SPAC890.03	yaf9	ppk16	-	mug92	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523224	2541496	2543567	277998	279983	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC890.03	arp42	ppk16	arp4	mug92	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523225	2542701	2543567	279154	279983	SPAC26H5.05	SPAC890.03	mga2	ppk16	SPAC26H5.05	mug92	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523226	2543263	2542102	279691	278578	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC8C9.17c	med6	spc34	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.1759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523227	2541628	2542102	278124	278578	SPAC110.02	SPAC8C9.17c	pds5	spc34	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523228	3361561	2542102	280637	278578	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC8C9.17c	swr1	spc34	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.1242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523229	2542757	2542102	279207	278578	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC8C9.17c	mre11	spc34	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.3651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523230	2541650	2542102	278146	278578	SPAC14C4.12c	SPAC8C9.17c	laf1	spc34	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523231	2541580	2542102	278077	278578	SPAC1687.05	SPAC8C9.17c	pli1	spc34	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523232	2542318	2542102	278784	278578	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC8C9.17c	cph1	spc34	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523233	2542277	2542102	278746	278578	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC8C9.17c	dbr1	spc34	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523234	2542421	2542102	278884	278578	SPAC17G8.05	SPAC8C9.17c	med20	spc34	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.5641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523235	2542278	2542102	278747	278578	SPAC17G8.07	SPAC8C9.17c	yaf9	spc34	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.6989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523236	2542207	2542102	278682	278578	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC8C9.17c	ddb1	spc34	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523237	2542463	2542102	278924	278578	SPAC1834.03c	SPAC8C9.17c	hhf1	spc34	h4.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523238	2542123	2542102	278599	278578	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC8C9.17c	mal3	spc34	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523239	2542126	2542102	278602	278578	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC8C9.17c	not3	spc34	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523240	2542007	2542102	278490	278578	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC8C9.17c	rad57	spc34	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523241	2541899	2542102	278389	278578	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC8C9.17c	set3	spc34	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523242	2542032	2542102	278514	278578	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC8C9.17c	pnk1	spc34	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523243	2541776	2542102	278270	278578	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC8C9.17c	swd1	spc34	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523244	2541856	2542102	278347	278578	SPAC23H3.08c	SPAC8C9.17c	bub3	spc34	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523245	2541531	2542102	278031	278578	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC8C9.17c	fft3	spc34	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.8316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523246	2542516	2542102	278974	278578	SPAC2F7.04	SPAC8C9.17c	pmc2	spc34	med1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.12	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523247	2543078	2542102	279511	278578	SPAC31A2.15c	SPAC8C9.17c	dcc1	spc34	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523248	2543190	2542102	279619	278578	SPAC31F12.01	SPAC8C9.17c	zds1	spc34	SPAC637.14|mug88	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523249	2541710	2542102	278205	278578	SPAC343.11c	SPAC8C9.17c	msc1	spc34	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.2425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523250	2543044	2542102	279479	278578	SPAC3C7.12	SPAC8C9.17c	tip1	spc34	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523251	2543643	2542102	280057	278578	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC8C9.17c	hos2	spc34	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523252	2543443	2542102	279863	278578	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC8C9.17c	snt2	spc34	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.4226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523253	2543378	2542102	279800	278578	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAC8C9.17c	pac10	spc34	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523254	2542878	2542102	279323	278578	SPAC57A10.09c	SPAC8C9.17c	nhp6	spc34	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523255	2543426	2542102	279846	278578	SPAC631.02	SPAC8C9.17c	bdf2	spc34	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.9918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523256	2543563	2542102	279979	278578	SPAC664.02c	SPAC8C9.17c	arp8	spc34	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.5976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523257	2543240	2542102	279668	278578	SPAC694.06c	SPAC8C9.17c	mrc1	spc34	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523258	2542198	2542102	278673	278578	SPAC6F12.09	SPAC8C9.17c	rdp1	spc34	rdr1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523259	2543117	2542102	279549	278578	SPAC806.08c	SPAC8C9.17c	mod21	spc34	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523260	2543263	2543341	279691	279764	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC8E11.07c	med6	alp31	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523261	2541628	2543341	278124	279764	SPAC110.02	SPAC8E11.07c	pds5	alp31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523262	2542318	2543341	278784	279764	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC8E11.07c	cph1	alp31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.5327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523263	2542349	2543341	278814	279764	SPAC1782.05	SPAC8E11.07c	ypa2	alp31	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523264	2542418	2543341	278881	279764	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC8E11.07c	dad2	alp31	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523265	2542541	2543341	278998	279764	SPAC1B3.03c	SPAC8E11.07c	wis2	alp31	cyp5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523266	2542066	2543341	278543	279764	SPAC227.05	SPAC8E11.07c	SPAC227.05	alp31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-22.4367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523267	2541498	2543341	278000	279764	SPAC227.10	SPAC8E11.07c	SPAC227.10	alp31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523268	2541856	2543341	278347	279764	SPAC23H3.08c	SPAC8E11.07c	bub3	alp31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523269	2541578	2543341	278075	279764	SPAC25B8.05	SPAC8E11.07c	deg1	alp31	SPAC25B8.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523270	2542701	2543341	279154	279764	SPAC26H5.05	SPAC8E11.07c	mga2	alp31	SPAC26H5.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.8994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523271	2541614	2543341	278111	279764	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC8E11.07c	elp3	alp31	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523272	2541889	2543341	278379	279764	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC8E11.07c	pom1	alp31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.3512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523273	2543190	2543341	279619	279764	SPAC31F12.01	SPAC8E11.07c	zds1	alp31	SPAC637.14|mug88	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523274	2543378	2543341	279800	279764	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAC8E11.07c	pac10	alp31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-22.9546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523275	2543580	2543341	279995	279764	SPAC644.14c	SPAC8E11.07c	rad51	alp31	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523276	2541633	2543341	278129	279764	SPAC664.01c	SPAC8E11.07c	swi6	alp31	SPAC824.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.4666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523277	2543563	2543341	279979	279764	SPAC664.02c	SPAC8E11.07c	arp8	alp31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.4589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523278	2542198	2543341	278673	279764	SPAC6F12.09	SPAC8E11.07c	rdp1	alp31	rdr1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523279	2542757	2543668	279207	280082	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC9.05	mre11	fml1	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523280	2541643	2543668	278139	280082	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC9.05	rad17	fml1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523281	2542318	2543668	278784	280082	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC9.05	cph1	fml1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523282	2542207	2543668	278682	280082	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC9.05	ddb1	fml1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523283	2542418	2543668	278881	280082	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC9.05	dad2	fml1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523284	2542558	2543668	279014	280082	SPAC1952.07	SPAC9.05	rad1	fml1	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.9976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523285	2541746	2543668	278240	280082	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC9.05	hus1	fml1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.8103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523286	2542757	2543530	279207	279948	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC926.07c	mre11	dlc2	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523287	2542568	2543530	279024	279948	SPAC1952.02	SPAC926.07c	tma23	dlc2	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523288	2542466	2543530	278927	279948	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC926.07c	nup40	dlc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.7725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523289	2541536	2543289	278036	279714	SPAC1071.02	SPAC9E9.08	mms19	rad26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523290	2541628	2543289	278124	279714	SPAC110.02	SPAC9E9.08	pds5	rad26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523291	2542757	2543289	279207	279714	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC9E9.08	mre11	rad26	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.5959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523292	2541580	2543289	278077	279714	SPAC1687.05	SPAC9E9.08	pli1	rad26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.2396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523293	2542207	2543289	278682	279714	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC9E9.08	ddb1	rad26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.7533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523294	2542558	2543289	279014	279714	SPAC1952.07	SPAC9E9.08	rad1	rad26	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523295	2541941	2543289	278428	279714	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC9E9.08	tfs1	rad26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523296	2542007	2543289	278490	279714	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC9E9.08	rad57	rad26	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.1296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523297	2541656	2543289	278152	279714	SPAC25H1.06	SPAC9E9.08	pcf3	rad26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523298	2543510	2543289	279928	279714	SPAC30D11.07	SPAC9E9.08	nth1	rad26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.6879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523299	2543164	2543289	279595	279714	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC9E9.08	rad2	rad26	fen1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.6713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523300	2543452	2543289	279872	279714	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC9E9.08	ssu72	rad26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523301	2543577	2543289	279992	279714	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC9E9.08	srs2	rad26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.0228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523302	2543580	2543289	279995	279714	SPAC644.14c	SPAC9E9.08	rad51	rad26	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.8616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523303	2543319	2543289	279743	279714	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC9E9.08	trm10	rad26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.3778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523304	2542198	2543289	278673	279714	SPAC6F12.09	SPAC9E9.08	rdp1	rad26	rdr1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523305	2543668	2543289	280082	279714	SPAC9.05	SPAC9E9.08	fml1	rad26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-18.5568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523306	2541776	2542329	278270	278795	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC9G1.10c	swd1	SPAC9G1.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523307	2543190	2542329	279619	278795	SPAC31F12.01	SPAC9G1.10c	zds1	SPAC9G1.10c	SPAC637.14|mug88	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523308	2543616	2542329	280030	278795	SPAC4A8.09c	SPAC9G1.10c	cwf21	SPAC9G1.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523309	2541536	2542192	278036	278667	SPAC1071.02	SPAC9G1.12	mms19	cpd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523310	2542466	2542192	278927	278667	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC9G1.12	nup40	cpd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523311	2541468	2542192	277970	278667	SPAC1F5.09c	SPAC9G1.12	shk2	cpd1	pak2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523312	2541776	2542192	278270	278667	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC9G1.12	swd1	cpd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523313	2541578	2542192	278075	278667	SPAC25B8.05	SPAC9G1.12	deg1	cpd1	SPAC25B8.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523314	2541656	2542192	278152	278667	SPAC25H1.06	SPAC9G1.12	pcf3	cpd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523315	2541801	2542192	278292	278667	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC9G1.12	snf5	cpd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523316	2542592	2542192	279047	278667	SPAC328.01c	SPAC9G1.12	msn5	cpd1	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.2964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523317	2543452	2542192	279872	278667	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC9G1.12	ssu72	cpd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523318	2542418	2542021	278881	278504	SPAC1805.07c	SPAP14E8.02	dad2	tos4	hos2	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.1666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523319	2542513	2542021	278971	278504	SPAC1952.05	SPAP14E8.02	gcn5	tos4	kat2	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523320	2541871	2542021	278361	278504	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAP14E8.02	res2	tos4	mcs1|pct1	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.3492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523321	2541496	2542021	277998	278504	SPAC23D3.09	SPAP14E8.02	arp42	tos4	arp4	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523322	2541776	2542021	278270	278504	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAP14E8.02	swd1	tos4	-	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523323	2541614	2542021	278111	278504	SPAC29A4.20	SPAP14E8.02	elp3	tos4	kat9	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523324	2543619	2542021	280033	278504	SPAC4F10.04	SPAP14E8.02	ypa1	tos4	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523325	2543319	2542021	279743	278504	SPAC6B12.09	SPAP14E8.02	trm10	tos4	-	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523326	2542102	2542021	278578	278504	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAP14E8.02	spc34	tos4	-	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523327	2542318	2543372	278784	279794	SPAC16C9.05	SPAPB1A10.09	cph1	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-18.5247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523328	2542398	2543372	278862	279794	SPAC1805.03c	SPAPB1A10.09	trm13	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523329	2542568	2543372	279024	279794	SPAC1952.02	SPAPB1A10.09	tma23	ase1	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523330	2542462	2543372	278923	279794	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC19B12.11c	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523331	2542126	2543372	278602	279794	SPAC1B3.05	SPAPB1A10.09	not3	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-21.4799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523332	2542066	2543372	278543	279794	SPAC227.05	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC227.05	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523333	2541498	2543372	278000	279794	SPAC227.10	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC227.10	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523334	2541786	2543372	278278	279794	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAPB1A10.09	rok1	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523335	2541979	2543372	278464	279794	SPAC23A1.07	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC23A1.07	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523336	2541496	2543372	277998	279794	SPAC23D3.09	SPAPB1A10.09	arp42	ase1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.1038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523337	2542094	2543372	278571	279794	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAPB1A10.09	rcd1	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523338	2541672	2543372	278168	279794	SPAC2F3.15	SPAPB1A10.09	lsk1	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.5891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523339	2542008	2543372	278491	279794	SPAC2G11.07c	SPAPB1A10.09	ptc3	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523340	2543064	2543372	279497	279794	SPAC3G6.01	SPAPB1A10.09	hrp3	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523341	2543452	2543372	279872	279794	SPAC3G9.04	SPAPB1A10.09	ssu72	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523342	2543399	2543372	279821	279794	SPAC3G9.12	SPAPB1A10.09	peg1	ase1	cls1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.5218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523343	2543378	2543372	279800	279794	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAPB1A10.09	pac10	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523344	2543319	2543372	279743	279794	SPAC6B12.09	SPAPB1A10.09	trm10	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523345	2543567	2543372	279983	279794	SPAC890.03	SPAPB1A10.09	ppk16	ase1	mug92	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.1993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523346	2543341	2543372	279764	279794	SPAC8E11.07c	SPAPB1A10.09	alp31	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-19.4956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523347	2543289	2543372	279714	279794	SPAC9E9.08	SPAPB1A10.09	rad26	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523348	2541536	2543387	278036	279809	SPAC1071.02	SPAPB1E7.02c	mms19	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523349	2541628	2543387	278124	279809	SPAC110.02	SPAPB1E7.02c	pds5	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.2137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523350	3361561	2543387	280637	279809	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAPB1E7.02c	swr1	mcl1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.2959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523351	2542757	2543387	279207	279809	SPAC13C5.07	SPAPB1E7.02c	mre11	mcl1	rad32	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523352	2541643	2543387	278139	279809	SPAC14C4.13	SPAPB1E7.02c	rad17	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.6621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523353	2541580	2543387	278077	279809	SPAC1687.05	SPAPB1E7.02c	pli1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523354	2541529	2543387	278029	279809	SPAC1687.13c	SPAPB1E7.02c	csn5	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523355	2542363	2543387	278827	279809	SPAC1783.05	SPAPB1E7.02c	hrp1	mcl1	chd1	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.8304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523356	2542278	2543387	278747	279809	SPAC17G8.07	SPAPB1E7.02c	yaf9	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-22.1011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523357	2542207	2543387	278682	279809	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAPB1E7.02c	ddb1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.1926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523358	2542463	2543387	278924	279809	SPAC1834.03c	SPAPB1E7.02c	hhf1	mcl1	h4.1	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.4283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523359	2542239	2543387	278711	279809	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAPB1E7.02c	chp1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.8985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523360	2542558	2543387	279014	279809	SPAC1952.07	SPAPB1E7.02c	rad1	mcl1	rad19	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.9411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523361	2542127	2543387	278603	279809	SPAC1952.12c	SPAPB1E7.02c	csn71	mcl1	csn7|csn7a	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523362	2542126	2543387	278602	279809	SPAC1B3.05	SPAPB1E7.02c	not3	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523363	2541746	2543387	278240	279809	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAPB1E7.02c	hus1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.9924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523364	2542007	2543387	278490	279809	SPAC20H4.07	SPAPB1E7.02c	rad57	mcl1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523365	2542032	2543387	278514	279809	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAPB1E7.02c	pnk1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523366	2541496	2543387	277998	279809	SPAC23D3.09	SPAPB1E7.02c	arp42	mcl1	arp4	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523367	2541776	2543387	278270	279809	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAPB1E7.02c	swd1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523368	2541531	2543387	278031	279809	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAPB1E7.02c	fft3	mcl1	snf2SR	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.1702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523369	2542701	2543387	279154	279809	SPAC26H5.05	SPAPB1E7.02c	mga2	mcl1	SPAC26H5.05	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523370	2542516	2543387	278974	279809	SPAC2F7.04	SPAPB1E7.02c	pmc2	mcl1	med1	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523371	2543078	2543387	279511	279809	SPAC31A2.15c	SPAPB1E7.02c	dcc1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.9555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523372	2543190	2543387	279619	279809	SPAC31F12.01	SPAPB1E7.02c	zds1	mcl1	SPAC637.14|mug88	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523373	2541710	2543387	278205	279809	SPAC343.11c	SPAPB1E7.02c	msc1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.0798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523374	2541713	2543387	278208	279809	SPAC3A12.12	SPAPB1E7.02c	atp11	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523375	2543443	2543387	279863	279809	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAPB1E7.02c	snt2	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523376	2543616	2543387	280030	279809	SPAC4A8.09c	SPAPB1E7.02c	cwf21	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523377	2543577	2543387	279992	279809	SPAC4H3.05	SPAPB1E7.02c	srs2	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523378	2543426	2543387	279846	279809	SPAC631.02	SPAPB1E7.02c	bdf2	mcl1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.9558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523379	2543384	2543387	279806	279809	SPAC637.06	SPAPB1E7.02c	gmh5	mcl1	SPAC637.06	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523380	2543580	2543387	279995	279809	SPAC644.14c	SPAPB1E7.02c	rad51	mcl1	rhp51	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523381	2541633	2543387	278129	279809	SPAC664.01c	SPAPB1E7.02c	swi6	mcl1	SPAC824.10c	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.1375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523382	2543544	2543387	279961	279809	SPAC664.07c	SPAPB1E7.02c	rad9	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.6574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523383	2543240	2543387	279668	279809	SPAC694.06c	SPAPB1E7.02c	mrc1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.5669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523384	2542198	2543387	278673	279809	SPAC6F12.09	SPAPB1E7.02c	rdp1	mcl1	rdr1	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.9152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523385	2543289	2543387	279714	279809	SPAC9E9.08	SPAPB1E7.02c	rad26	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.8424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523386	2543372	2543387	279794	279809	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAPB1E7.02c	ase1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523387	2542757	2543670	279207	280084	SPAC13C5.07	SPAPB1E7.06c	mre11	eme1	rad32	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523388	2541580	2543670	278077	280084	SPAC1687.05	SPAPB1E7.06c	pli1	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.0301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523389	2542318	2543670	278784	280084	SPAC16C9.05	SPAPB1E7.06c	cph1	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.6729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523390	2542150	2543670	278626	280084	SPAC17A5.11	SPAPB1E7.06c	rec12	eme1	spo11	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523391	2542278	2543670	278747	280084	SPAC17G8.07	SPAPB1E7.06c	yaf9	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523392	2542418	2543670	278881	280084	SPAC1805.07c	SPAPB1E7.06c	dad2	eme1	hos2	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.3158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523393	2542123	2543670	278599	280084	SPAC18G6.15	SPAPB1E7.06c	mal3	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523394	2542568	2543670	279024	280084	SPAC1952.02	SPAPB1E7.06c	tma23	eme1	SPAC1952.02	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.6643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523395	2542513	2543670	278971	280084	SPAC1952.05	SPAPB1E7.06c	gcn5	eme1	kat2	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523396	2542466	2543670	278927	280084	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAPB1E7.06c	nup40	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523397	2542519	2543670	278977	280084	SPAC19G12.08	SPAPB1E7.06c	scs7	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523398	2542126	2543670	278602	280084	SPAC1B3.05	SPAPB1E7.06c	not3	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523399	2542014	2543670	278497	280084	SPAC20H4.04	SPAPB1E7.06c	fml2	eme1	mfh2	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523400	2542007	2543670	278490	280084	SPAC20H4.07	SPAPB1E7.06c	rad57	eme1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523401	2541786	2543670	278278	280084	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAPB1E7.06c	rok1	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523402	2541871	2543670	278361	280084	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAPB1E7.06c	res2	eme1	mcs1|pct1	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523403	2542036	2543670	278518	280084	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAPB1E7.06c	hrq1	eme1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.7588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523404	2541961	2543670	278448	280084	SPAC23C4.02	SPAPB1E7.06c	crn1	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523405	2541496	2543670	277998	280084	SPAC23D3.09	SPAPB1E7.06c	arp42	eme1	arp4	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.2546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523406	2541776	2543670	278270	280084	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAPB1E7.06c	swd1	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523407	2542071	2543670	278548	280084	SPAC26H5.03	SPAPB1E7.06c	pcf2	eme1	cac2	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523408	2542094	2543670	278571	280084	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAPB1E7.06c	rcd1	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523409	2541801	2543670	278292	280084	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAPB1E7.06c	snf5	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.7333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523410	2543064	2543670	279497	280084	SPAC3G6.01	SPAPB1E7.06c	hrp3	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523411	2543164	2543670	279595	280084	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAPB1E7.06c	rad2	eme1	fen1	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523412	2543576	2543670	279991	280084	SPAC4A8.05c	SPAPB1E7.06c	myp2	eme1	myo3	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523413	2541542	2543670	278042	280084	SPAC4G9.02	SPAPB1E7.06c	rnh201	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.8316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523414	2543423	2543670	279844	280084	SPAC4H3.07c	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPAC4H3.07c	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523415	2541633	2543670	278129	280084	SPAC664.01c	SPAPB1E7.06c	swi6	eme1	SPAC824.10c	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523416	2543563	2543670	279979	280084	SPAC664.02c	SPAPB1E7.06c	arp8	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.67	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523417	2542228	2543670	278701	280084	SPAC823.03	SPAPB1E7.06c	ppk15	eme1	SPAC1E11.03	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523418	2543668	2543670	280082	280084	SPAC9.05	SPAPB1E7.06c	fml1	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523419	2541762	2543463	278256	279883	SPAC139.01c	SPAPB21F2.03	SPAC139.01c	slx9	SPAC955.02c	SPAPB21F2.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523420	2542277	2543463	278746	279883	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAPB21F2.03	dbr1	slx9	-	SPAPB21F2.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523421	2542466	2543463	278927	279883	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAPB21F2.03	nup40	slx9	-	SPAPB21F2.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523422	2543226	2543419	279654	279841	SPAC6B12.05c	SPAPB24D3.02c	ies2	SPAPB24D3.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523423	2543319	2543565	279743	279981	SPAC6B12.09	SPAPB24D3.04c	trm10	mag1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523424	2542192	2543565	278667	279981	SPAC9G1.12	SPAPB24D3.04c	cpd1	mag1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523425	2543263	2541470	279691	277972	SPAC1002.15c	SPAPYUG7.04c	med6	rpb9	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.5888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523426	2542421	2541470	278884	277972	SPAC17G8.05	SPAPYUG7.04c	med20	rpb9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523427	2541578	2541470	278075	277972	SPAC25B8.05	SPAPYUG7.04c	deg1	rpb9	SPAC25B8.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523428	2541672	2541470	278168	277972	SPAC2F3.15	SPAPYUG7.04c	lsk1	rpb9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523429	2541801	2541470	278292	277972	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAPYUG7.04c	snf5	rpb9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523430	2543452	2541470	279872	277972	SPAC3G9.04	SPAPYUG7.04c	ssu72	rpb9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523431	2543443	2541470	279863	277972	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAPYUG7.04c	snt2	rpb9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523432	2543426	2541470	279846	277972	SPAC631.02	SPAPYUG7.04c	bdf2	rpb9	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523433	2542192	2541470	278667	277972	SPAC9G1.12	SPAPYUG7.04c	cpd1	rpb9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523434	2542519	2542933	278977	279374	SPAC19G12.08	SPAPYUG7.06	scs7	sdu1	-	mug67|hag1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523435	2543263	2540060	279691	276598	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC106.01	med6	mph1	pmc5	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523436	2541628	2540060	278124	276598	SPAC110.02	SPBC106.01	pds5	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.0364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523437	2541818	2540060	278309	276598	SPAC11G7.02	SPBC106.01	pub1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523438	2541580	2540060	278077	276598	SPAC1687.05	SPBC106.01	pli1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523439	2542349	2540060	278814	276598	SPAC1782.05	SPBC106.01	ypa2	mph1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523440	2542278	2540060	278747	276598	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC106.01	yaf9	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523441	2542207	2540060	278682	276598	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC106.01	ddb1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523442	2542418	2540060	278881	276598	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC106.01	dad2	mph1	hos2	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523443	2542123	2540060	278599	276598	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC106.01	mal3	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-18.1645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523444	2542568	2540060	279024	276598	SPAC1952.02	SPBC106.01	tma23	mph1	SPAC1952.02	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523445	2542237	2540060	278709	276598	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC106.01	fin1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-22.0916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523446	2541871	2540060	278361	276598	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC106.01	res2	mph1	mcs1|pct1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523447	2541496	2540060	277998	276598	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC106.01	arp42	mph1	arp4	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.8317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523448	2541531	2540060	278031	276598	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC106.01	fft3	mph1	snf2SR	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523449	2542701	2540060	279154	276598	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC106.01	mga2	mph1	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.67	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523450	2543078	2540060	279511	276598	SPAC31A2.15c	SPBC106.01	dcc1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523451	2542592	2540060	279047	276598	SPAC328.01c	SPBC106.01	msn5	mph1	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523452	2543426	2540060	279846	276598	SPAC631.02	SPBC106.01	bdf2	mph1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523453	2541633	2540060	278129	276598	SPAC664.01c	SPBC106.01	swi6	mph1	SPAC824.10c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.2674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523454	2542198	2540060	278673	276598	SPAC6F12.09	SPBC106.01	rdp1	mph1	rdr1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.8964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523455	2542102	2540060	278578	276598	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC106.01	spc34	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523456	2543341	2540060	279764	276598	SPAC8E11.07c	SPBC106.01	alp31	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.7558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523457	2543372	2540060	279794	276598	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC106.01	ase1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523458	2542168	2540173	278643	276706	SPAC17A5.16	SPBC106.13	ftp105	SPBC106.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523459	2542925	2539971	279366	276515	SPAC11E3.04c	SPBC1105.04c	ubc13	cbp1	spu13|sst5	abp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523460	2540106	2539971	276643	276515	SPBC12D12.09	SPBC1105.04c	rev7	cbp1	SPAC12D12.09	abp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523461	2542788	2539971	279237	276515	SPAC15A10.15	SPBC1105.04c	sgo2	cbp1	-	abp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523462	2542409	2539971	278873	276515	SPAC17G8.10c	SPBC1105.04c	dma1	cbp1	-	abp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523463	2542170	2539971	278645	276515	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC1105.04c	mst2	cbp1	-	abp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523464	2542398	2539971	278862	276515	SPAC1805.03c	SPBC1105.04c	trm13	cbp1	-	abp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523465	2542418	2539971	278881	276515	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC1105.04c	dad2	cbp1	hos2	abp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523466	2542239	2539971	278711	276515	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC1105.04c	chp1	cbp1	-	abp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523467	2542123	2539971	278599	276515	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC1105.04c	mal3	cbp1	-	abp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523468	2542237	2539971	278709	276515	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC1105.04c	fin1	cbp1	-	abp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523469	2542014	2539971	278497	276515	SPAC20H4.04	SPBC1105.04c	fml2	cbp1	mfh2	abp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523470	2541786	2539971	278278	276515	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC1105.04c	rok1	cbp1	-	abp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.5466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523471	2541531	2539971	278031	276515	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1105.04c	fft3	cbp1	snf2SR	abp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.2789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523472	2542094	2539971	278571	276515	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC1105.04c	rcd1	cbp1	-	abp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523473	2541801	2539971	278292	276515	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC1105.04c	snf5	cbp1	-	abp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523474	2543078	2539971	279511	276515	SPAC31A2.15c	SPBC1105.04c	dcc1	cbp1	-	abp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523475	2543452	2539971	279872	276515	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC1105.04c	ssu72	cbp1	-	abp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.4087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523476	2543443	2539971	279863	276515	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC1105.04c	snt2	cbp1	-	abp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523477	2543516	2539971	279934	276515	SPAC4F10.11	SPBC1105.04c	spn1	cbp1	-	abp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.2753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523478	2543592	2539971	280007	276515	SPAC4F10.18	SPBC1105.04c	nup37	cbp1	-	abp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523479	2542878	2539971	279323	276515	SPAC57A10.09c	SPBC1105.04c	nhp6	cbp1	-	abp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523480	2541633	2539971	278129	276515	SPAC664.01c	SPBC1105.04c	swi6	cbp1	SPAC824.10c	abp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.6289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523481	2543214	2539971	279643	276515	SPAC6F12.06	SPBC1105.04c	SPAC6F12.06	cbp1	-	abp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523482	2542102	2539971	278578	276515	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC1105.04c	spc34	cbp1	-	abp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523483	2542072	2539971	278549	276515	SPAP32A8.03c	SPBC1105.04c	bop1	cbp1	SPAP32A8.03c	abp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523484	2543463	2539971	279883	276515	SPAPB21F2.03	SPBC1105.04c	slx9	cbp1	SPAPB21F2.03	abp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.82	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523485	2543419	2539971	279841	276515	SPAPB24D3.02c	SPBC1105.04c	SPAPB24D3.02c	cbp1	-	abp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523486	2540060	2539971	276598	276515	SPBC106.01	SPBC1105.04c	mph1	cbp1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	abp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523487	2543240	2539804	279668	276354	SPAC694.06c	SPBC1105.11c	mrc1	hht3	-	h3.3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523488	3361478	2539604	280554	276162	SPAC13A11.06	SPBC1105.14	SPAC13A11.06	rsv2	SPAC3H8.01	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523489	2542318	2539604	278784	276162	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC1105.14	cph1	rsv2	-	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523490	2542168	2539604	278643	276162	SPAC17A5.16	SPBC1105.14	ftp105	rsv2	-	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523491	2542519	2539604	278977	276162	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC1105.14	scs7	rsv2	-	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523492	2541786	2539604	278278	276162	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC1105.14	rok1	rsv2	-	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523493	2541496	2539604	277998	276162	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC1105.14	arp42	rsv2	arp4	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523494	2541789	2539604	278281	276162	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC1105.14	iwr1	rsv2	-	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523495	2542701	2539604	279154	276162	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC1105.14	mga2	rsv2	SPAC26H5.05	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523496	2543616	2539604	280030	276162	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC1105.14	cwf21	rsv2	-	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523497	2543240	2539604	279668	276162	SPAC694.06c	SPBC1105.14	mrc1	rsv2	-	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.2011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523498	2542021	2539604	278504	276162	SPAP14E8.02	SPBC1105.14	tos4	rsv2	SPAP14E8.02	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523499	2541536	2539920	278036	276464	SPAC1071.02	SPBC119.08	mms19	pmk1	-	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523500	2542809	2539920	279257	276464	SPAC15A10.11	SPBC119.08	ubr11	pmk1	-	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523501	2542318	2539920	278784	276464	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC119.08	cph1	pmk1	-	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.2116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523502	2542349	2539920	278814	276464	SPAC1782.05	SPBC119.08	ypa2	pmk1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523503	2541786	2539920	278278	276464	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC119.08	rok1	pmk1	-	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523504	2541889	2539920	278379	276464	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC119.08	pom1	pmk1	-	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523505	2543190	2539920	279619	276464	SPAC31F12.01	SPBC119.08	zds1	pmk1	SPAC637.14|mug88	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523506	2543529	2540121	279947	276658	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC119.14	ryh1	rti1	hos1|sat7	rad22B	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523507	2541818	2539930	278309	276474	SPAC11G7.02	SPBC1198.11c	pub1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523508	5802929	2539930	858067	276474	SPAC1556.08c	SPBC1198.11c	cbs2	reb1	SPAC1F12.01c	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523509	2542318	2539930	278784	276474	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC1198.11c	cph1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523510	2542349	2539930	278814	276474	SPAC1782.05	SPBC1198.11c	ypa2	reb1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523511	2542168	2539930	278643	276474	SPAC17A5.16	SPBC1198.11c	ftp105	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523512	2542145	2539930	278621	276474	SPAC17C9.09c	SPBC1198.11c	tim13	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523513	2542278	2539930	278747	276474	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC1198.11c	yaf9	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523514	2542418	2539930	278881	276474	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC1198.11c	dad2	reb1	hos2	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523515	2542513	2539930	278971	276474	SPAC1952.05	SPBC1198.11c	gcn5	reb1	kat2	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.6738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523516	2542462	2539930	278923	276474	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC19B12.11c	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523517	2541899	2539930	278389	276474	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC1198.11c	set3	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523518	2541871	2539930	278361	276474	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC1198.11c	res2	reb1	mcs1|pct1	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.5362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523519	2542032	2539930	278514	276474	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC1198.11c	pnk1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523520	2541496	2539930	277998	276474	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC1198.11c	arp42	reb1	arp4	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.0077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523521	2541776	2539930	278270	276474	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC1198.11c	swd1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.1701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523522	2542087	2539930	278564	276474	SPAC26F1.02	SPBC1198.11c	pnn1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523523	2541614	2539930	278111	276474	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC1198.11c	elp3	reb1	kat9	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.3487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523524	2542094	2539930	278571	276474	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC1198.11c	rcd1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523525	2541889	2539930	278379	276474	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC1198.11c	pom1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523526	2541801	2539930	278292	276474	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC1198.11c	snf5	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523527	2543160	2539930	279591	276474	SPAC31A2.14	SPBC1198.11c	bun107	reb1	wdr48	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523528	2543190	2539930	279619	276474	SPAC31F12.01	SPBC1198.11c	zds1	reb1	SPAC637.14|mug88	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523529	2542592	2539930	279047	276474	SPAC328.01c	SPBC1198.11c	msn5	reb1	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523530	2543064	2539930	279497	276474	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC1198.11c	hrp3	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523531	2543118	2539930	279550	276474	SPAC3G6.11	SPBC1198.11c	chl1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523532	2543452	2539930	279872	276474	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC1198.11c	ssu72	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.5977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523533	2543643	2539930	280057	276474	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC1198.11c	hos2	reb1	hda1|phd1	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523534	2543443	2539930	279863	276474	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC1198.11c	snt2	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523535	2542571	2539930	279027	276474	SPAC589.02c	SPBC1198.11c	med13	reb1	spTrap240|srb9	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523536	2543580	2539930	279995	276474	SPAC644.14c	SPBC1198.11c	rad51	reb1	rhp51	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523537	2542845	2539930	279291	276474	SPAC824.04	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC824.04	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523538	2542102	2539930	278578	276474	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC1198.11c	spc34	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523539	2543372	2539930	279794	276474	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC1198.11c	ase1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523540	2541470	2539930	277972	276474	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC1198.11c	rpb9	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523541	2539604	2539930	276162	276474	SPBC1105.14	SPBC1198.11c	rsv2	reb1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523542	2541536	2539668	278036	276223	SPAC1071.02	SPBC11B10.10c	mms19	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.0583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523543	2542311	2539668	278777	276223	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC11B10.10c	dad1	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523544	2542318	2539668	278784	276223	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC11B10.10c	cph1	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.1471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523545	2542277	2539668	278746	276223	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC11B10.10c	dbr1	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.4391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523546	2542145	2539668	278621	276223	SPAC17C9.09c	SPBC11B10.10c	tim13	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523547	2542170	2539668	278645	276223	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC11B10.10c	mst2	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523548	2542418	2539668	278881	276223	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC11B10.10c	dad2	pht1	hos2	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.1512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523549	2542568	2539668	279024	276223	SPAC1952.02	SPBC11B10.10c	tma23	pht1	SPAC1952.02	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523550	2542237	2539668	278709	276223	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC11B10.10c	fin1	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523551	2542126	2539668	278602	276223	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC11B10.10c	not3	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523552	2542459	2539668	278920	276223	SPAC1D4.03c	SPBC11B10.10c	aut12	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523553	2541899	2539668	278389	276223	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC11B10.10c	set3	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-18.1955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523554	2541786	2539668	278278	276223	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC11B10.10c	rok1	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523555	2541885	2539668	278375	276223	SPAC22H10.03c	SPBC11B10.10c	kap114	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523556	2542036	2539668	278518	276223	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC11B10.10c	hrq1	pht1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523557	2541496	2539668	277998	276223	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC11B10.10c	arp42	pht1	arp4	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.3401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523558	2541776	2539668	278270	276223	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC11B10.10c	swd1	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523559	2541789	2539668	278281	276223	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC11B10.10c	iwr1	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523560	2541531	2539668	278031	276223	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC11B10.10c	fft3	pht1	snf2SR	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.3462	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523561	2542701	2539668	279154	276223	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC11B10.10c	mga2	pht1	SPAC26H5.05	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523562	2541614	2539668	278111	276223	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC11B10.10c	elp3	pht1	kat9	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523563	2541672	2539668	278168	276223	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC11B10.10c	lsk1	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.3546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523564	2541889	2539668	278379	276223	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC11B10.10c	pom1	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523565	2542516	2539668	278974	276223	SPAC2F7.04	SPBC11B10.10c	pmc2	pht1	med1	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523566	2543452	2539668	279872	276223	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC11B10.10c	ssu72	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.8931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523567	2543643	2539668	280057	276223	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC11B10.10c	hos2	pht1	hda1|phd1	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-18.4679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523568	2543443	2539668	279863	276223	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC11B10.10c	snt2	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-21.5274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523569	2543616	2539668	280030	276223	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC11B10.10c	cwf21	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523570	2543529	2539668	279947	276223	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC11B10.10c	ryh1	pht1	hos1|sat7	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523571	2543619	2539668	280033	276223	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC11B10.10c	ypa1	pht1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523572	2543423	2539668	279844	276223	SPAC4H3.07c	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC4H3.07c	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523573	2543426	2539668	279846	276223	SPAC631.02	SPBC11B10.10c	bdf2	pht1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.1065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523574	2543563	2539668	279979	276223	SPAC664.02c	SPBC11B10.10c	arp8	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.4374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523575	2543226	2539668	279654	276223	SPAC6B12.05c	SPBC11B10.10c	ies2	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523576	2542845	2539668	279291	276223	SPAC824.04	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC824.04	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-19.0405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523577	2542102	2539668	278578	276223	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC11B10.10c	spc34	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.3773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523578	2542192	2539668	278667	276223	SPAC9G1.12	SPBC11B10.10c	cpd1	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.6623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523579	2543387	2539668	279809	276223	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC11B10.10c	mcl1	pht1	slr3	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.8496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523580	2541470	2539668	277972	276223	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC11B10.10c	rpb9	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523581	2540060	2539668	276598	276223	SPBC106.01	SPBC11B10.10c	mph1	pht1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523582	2539920	2539668	276464	276223	SPBC119.08	SPBC11B10.10c	pmk1	pht1	spm1	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523583	2543240	2540023	279668	276567	SPAC694.06c	SPBC11C11.10	mrc1	SPBC11C11.10	-	SPBC3B8.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.4351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523584	2543289	2540023	279714	276567	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC11C11.10	rad26	SPBC11C11.10	-	SPBC3B8.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523585	2543240	2539613	279668	276171	SPAC694.06c	SPBC11C11.11c	mrc1	SPBC11C11.11c	-	SPBC3B8.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.5932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523586	2543289	2539613	279714	276171	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC11C11.11c	rad26	SPBC11C11.11c	-	SPBC3B8.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523587	2543263	2539679	279691	276234	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC12C2.05c	med6	bzz1	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523588	5802929	2539679	858067	276234	SPAC1556.08c	SPBC12C2.05c	cbs2	bzz1	SPAC1F12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523589	2543384	2539679	279806	276234	SPAC637.06	SPBC12C2.05c	gmh5	bzz1	SPAC637.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523590	2543670	2539679	280084	276234	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC12C2.05c	eme1	bzz1	mms4|slx2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523591	2543423	2540159	279844	276694	SPAC4H3.07c	SPBC12C2.08	SPAC4H3.07c	dnm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523592	2543263	2540008	279691	276552	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC12D12.02c	med6	cdm1	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.2837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523593	2542363	2540008	278827	276552	SPAC1783.05	SPBC12D12.02c	hrp1	cdm1	chd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523594	3361533	2540008	280609	276552	SPAC222.15	SPBC12D12.02c	meu13	cdm1	SPAC821.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523595	2543384	2540008	279806	276552	SPAC637.06	SPBC12D12.02c	gmh5	cdm1	SPAC637.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523596	2541536	2539651	278036	276206	SPAC1071.02	SPBC12D12.06	mms19	srb11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523597	2541628	2539651	278124	276206	SPAC110.02	SPBC12D12.06	pds5	srb11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523598	5802929	2539651	858067	276206	SPAC1556.08c	SPBC12D12.06	cbs2	srb11	SPAC1F12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523599	2542363	2539651	278827	276206	SPAC1783.05	SPBC12D12.06	hrp1	srb11	chd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523600	2542168	2539651	278643	276206	SPAC17A5.16	SPBC12D12.06	ftp105	srb11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.6464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523601	2542418	2539651	278881	276206	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC12D12.06	dad2	srb11	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523602	2542463	2539651	278924	276206	SPAC1834.03c	SPBC12D12.06	hhf1	srb11	h4.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523603	2542568	2539651	279024	276206	SPAC1952.02	SPBC12D12.06	tma23	srb11	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.7287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523604	2542462	2539651	278923	276206	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC19B12.11c	srb11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.2848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523605	2542541	2539651	278998	276206	SPAC1B3.03c	SPBC12D12.06	wis2	srb11	cyp5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523606	2541728	2539651	278222	276206	SPAC20G4.03c	SPBC12D12.06	hri1	srb11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523607	2541786	2539651	278278	276206	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC12D12.06	rok1	srb11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523608	2541871	2539651	278361	276206	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC12D12.06	res2	srb11	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523609	2541663	2539651	278159	276206	SPAC22G7.08	SPBC12D12.06	ppk8	srb11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.5857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523610	2542032	2539651	278514	276206	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC12D12.06	pnk1	srb11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.0057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523611	2541578	2539651	278075	276206	SPAC25B8.05	SPBC12D12.06	deg1	srb11	SPAC25B8.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523612	2542701	2539651	279154	276206	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC12D12.06	mga2	srb11	SPAC26H5.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.9523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523613	2542094	2539651	278571	276206	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC12D12.06	rcd1	srb11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523614	2542516	2539651	278974	276206	SPAC2F7.04	SPBC12D12.06	pmc2	srb11	med1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523615	2543101	2539651	279533	276206	SPAC323.03c	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC323.03c	srb11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523616	2541713	2539651	278208	276206	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC12D12.06	atp11	srb11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523617	2543044	2539651	279479	276206	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC12D12.06	tip1	srb11	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523618	2543109	2539651	279541	276206	SPAC3G6.09c	SPBC12D12.06	tps2	srb11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523619	2543619	2539651	280033	276206	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC12D12.06	ypa1	srb11	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523620	2543432	2539651	279852	276206	SPAC4G8.05	SPBC12D12.06	ppk14	srb11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.4106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523621	2543551	2539651	279968	276206	SPAC4G8.06c	SPBC12D12.06	trm12	srb11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523622	2543577	2539651	279992	276206	SPAC4H3.05	SPBC12D12.06	srs2	srb11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523623	2543423	2539651	279844	276206	SPAC4H3.07c	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC4H3.07c	srb11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523624	2543319	2539651	279743	276206	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC12D12.06	trm10	srb11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523625	2542072	2539651	278549	276206	SPAP32A8.03c	SPBC12D12.06	bop1	srb11	SPAP32A8.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523626	2543387	2539651	279809	276206	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC12D12.06	mcl1	srb11	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523627	2540173	2539651	276706	276206	SPBC106.13	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC106.13	srb11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523628	2539930	2539651	276474	276206	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC12D12.06	reb1	srb11	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523629	2542757	2539812	279207	276362	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC1347.02	mre11	fkbp39	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523630	2542363	2539812	278827	276362	SPAC1783.05	SPBC1347.02	hrp1	fkbp39	chd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523631	2542207	2539812	278682	276362	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC1347.02	ddb1	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523632	2542239	2539812	278711	276362	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC1347.02	chp1	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-21.8771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523633	2541468	2539812	277970	276362	SPAC1F5.09c	SPBC1347.02	shk2	fkbp39	pak2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523634	2542007	2539812	278490	276362	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC1347.02	rad57	fkbp39	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523635	2541871	2539812	278361	276362	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC1347.02	res2	fkbp39	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523636	2541885	2539812	278375	276362	SPAC22H10.03c	SPBC1347.02	kap114	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523637	2541531	2539812	278031	276362	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1347.02	fft3	fkbp39	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523638	2542592	2539812	279047	276362	SPAC328.01c	SPBC1347.02	msn5	fkbp39	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523639	2542571	2539812	279027	276362	SPAC589.02c	SPBC1347.02	med13	fkbp39	spTrap240|srb9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523640	2541633	2539812	278129	276362	SPAC664.01c	SPBC1347.02	swi6	fkbp39	SPAC824.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523641	2543563	2539812	279979	276362	SPAC664.02c	SPBC1347.02	arp8	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.5323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523642	2542198	2539812	278673	276362	SPAC6F12.09	SPBC1347.02	rdp1	fkbp39	rdr1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.4682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523643	2543372	2539812	279794	276362	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC1347.02	ase1	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.9568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523644	2539930	2539812	276474	276362	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC1347.02	reb1	fkbp39	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523645	2539668	2539812	276223	276362	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC1347.02	pht1	fkbp39	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.2041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523646	2539651	2539812	276206	276362	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC1347.02	srb11	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523647	2542757	2539891	279207	276437	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC1347.08c	mre11	SPBC1347.08c	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523648	2542207	2539891	278682	276437	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC1347.08c	ddb1	SPBC1347.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523649	2543580	2539891	279995	276437	SPAC644.14c	SPBC1347.08c	rad51	SPBC1347.08c	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523650	2543670	2539891	280084	276437	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC1347.08c	eme1	SPBC1347.08c	mms4|slx2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523651	2539604	2539891	276162	276437	SPBC1105.14	SPBC1347.08c	rsv2	SPBC1347.08c	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523652	2543190	2539676	279619	276231	SPAC31F12.01	SPBC1347.12	zds1	arp1	SPAC637.14|mug88	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523653	2542418	2539726	278881	276278	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC13E7.08c	dad2	leo1	hos2	SPBC13E7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523654	2541496	2539726	277998	276278	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC13E7.08c	arp42	leo1	arp4	SPBC13E7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523655	2543619	2539726	280033	276278	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC13E7.08c	ypa1	leo1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPBC13E7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523656	2543240	2539726	279668	276278	SPAC694.06c	SPBC13E7.08c	mrc1	leo1	-	SPBC13E7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523657	2539668	2539726	276223	276278	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC13E7.08c	pht1	leo1	pi001	SPBC13E7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523658	2542318	2540100	278784	276638	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC13E7.09	cph1	vrp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523659	2542418	2540100	278881	276638	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC13E7.09	dad2	vrp1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.0347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523660	2543240	2540100	279668	276638	SPAC694.06c	SPBC13E7.09	mrc1	vrp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523661	2541536	2539667	278036	276222	SPAC1071.02	SPBC13G1.08c	mms19	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523662	3361561	2539667	280637	276222	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC13G1.08c	swr1	ash2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.9235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523663	2541762	2539667	278256	276222	SPAC139.01c	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC139.01c	ash2	SPAC955.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523664	2542757	2539667	279207	276222	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC13G1.08c	mre11	ash2	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.8429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523665	2541580	2539667	278077	276222	SPAC1687.05	SPBC13G1.08c	pli1	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523666	2542300	2539667	278767	276222	SPAC1687.22c	SPBC13G1.08c	puf3	ash2	SPAC222.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523667	2542363	2539667	278827	276222	SPAC1783.05	SPBC13G1.08c	hrp1	ash2	chd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523668	2542278	2539667	278747	276222	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC13G1.08c	yaf9	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.5499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523669	2542170	2539667	278645	276222	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC13G1.08c	mst2	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.6243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523670	2542418	2539667	278881	276222	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC13G1.08c	dad2	ash2	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.4951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523671	2542123	2539667	278599	276222	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC13G1.08c	mal3	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523672	2542555	2539667	279012	276222	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC1952.06c	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523673	2541899	2539667	278389	276222	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC13G1.08c	set3	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.8863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523674	2541871	2539667	278361	276222	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC13G1.08c	res2	ash2	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523675	2541663	2539667	278159	276222	SPAC22G7.08	SPBC13G1.08c	ppk8	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523676	2541929	2539667	278417	276222	SPAC23C4.12	SPBC13G1.08c	hhp2	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523677	2541789	2539667	278281	276222	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC13G1.08c	iwr1	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.5081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523678	2541672	2539667	278168	276222	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC13G1.08c	lsk1	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.0149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523679	2542516	2539667	278974	276222	SPAC2F7.04	SPBC13G1.08c	pmc2	ash2	med1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523680	2541710	2539667	278205	276222	SPAC343.11c	SPBC13G1.08c	msc1	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.3856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523681	3361512	2539667	280588	276222	SPAC3C7.01c	SPBC13G1.08c	sac12	ash2	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523682	2543044	2539667	279479	276222	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC13G1.08c	tip1	ash2	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523683	2543064	2539667	279497	276222	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC13G1.08c	hrp3	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.0026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523684	2543452	2539667	279872	276222	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC13G1.08c	ssu72	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.1918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523685	2543643	2539667	280057	276222	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC13G1.08c	hos2	ash2	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.8126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523686	2543443	2539667	279863	276222	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC13G1.08c	snt2	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.6285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523687	2543338	2539667	279761	276222	SPAC458.06	SPBC13G1.08c	atg1803	ash2	SPAC458.06|atg18|atg18c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523688	2543619	2539667	280033	276222	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC13G1.08c	ypa1	ash2	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523689	2543516	2539667	279934	276222	SPAC4F10.11	SPBC13G1.08c	spn1	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523690	2543667	2539667	280081	276222	SPAC4H3.02c	SPBC13G1.08c	swc3	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.2182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523691	2543563	2539667	279979	276222	SPAC664.02c	SPBC13G1.08c	arp8	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523692	2543226	2539667	279654	276222	SPAC6B12.05c	SPBC13G1.08c	ies2	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523693	2543319	2539667	279743	276222	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC13G1.08c	trm10	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523694	2542891	2539667	279335	276222	SPAC6F12.12	SPBC13G1.08c	par2	ash2	pbp2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523695	2543567	2539667	279983	276222	SPAC890.03	SPBC13G1.08c	ppk16	ash2	mug92	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523696	2542102	2539667	278578	276222	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC13G1.08c	spc34	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.9254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523697	2542329	2539667	278795	276222	SPAC9G1.10c	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC9G1.10c	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523698	2543387	2539667	279809	276222	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC13G1.08c	mcl1	ash2	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.9709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523699	2541470	2539667	277972	276222	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC13G1.08c	rpb9	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.8778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523700	2540060	2539667	276598	276222	SPBC106.01	SPBC13G1.08c	mph1	ash2	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523701	2539930	2539667	276474	276222	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC13G1.08c	reb1	ash2	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.0355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523702	2539668	2539667	276223	276222	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC13G1.08c	pht1	ash2	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.0182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523703	2539726	2539667	276278	276222	SPBC13E7.08c	SPBC13G1.08c	leo1	ash2	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523704	2543263	2539673	279691	276228	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC13G1.10c	med6	mug81	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523705	2542809	2539673	279257	276228	SPAC15A10.11	SPBC13G1.10c	ubr11	mug81	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523706	2542764	2539673	279214	276228	SPAC15E1.10	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC15E1.10	mug81	SPAP7G5.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523707	2542207	2539673	278682	276228	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC13G1.10c	ddb1	mug81	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523708	2542418	2539673	278881	276228	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC13G1.10c	dad2	mug81	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523709	2541468	2539673	277970	276228	SPAC1F5.09c	SPBC13G1.10c	shk2	mug81	pak2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523710	2543372	2539673	279794	276228	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC13G1.10c	ase1	mug81	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523711	2539651	2539673	276206	276228	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC13G1.10c	srb11	mug81	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523712	3361561	2539773	280637	276324	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC14F5.08	swr1	med7	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.8809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523713	2542278	2539773	278747	276324	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC14F5.08	yaf9	med7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-19.6224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523714	2541496	2539773	277998	276324	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC14F5.08	arp42	med7	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523715	2541801	2539773	278292	276324	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC14F5.08	snf5	med7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523716	2541710	2539773	278205	276324	SPAC343.11c	SPBC14F5.08	msc1	med7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523717	2543452	2539773	279872	276324	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC14F5.08	ssu72	med7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.9992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523718	2543426	2539773	279846	276324	SPAC631.02	SPBC14F5.08	bdf2	med7	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-22.244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523719	2539668	2539773	276223	276324	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC14F5.08	pht1	med7	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.3463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523720	2543670	2539926	280084	276470	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC14F5.13c	eme1	pho8	mms4|slx2	SPBC14F5.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523721	2543263	2539787	279691	276337	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC15C4.06c	med6	SPBC15C4.06c	pmc5	SPBC21H7.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.5382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523722	2541536	2539787	278036	276337	SPAC1071.02	SPBC15C4.06c	mms19	SPBC15C4.06c	-	SPBC21H7.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523723	2541628	2539787	278124	276337	SPAC110.02	SPBC15C4.06c	pds5	SPBC15C4.06c	-	SPBC21H7.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523724	2542318	2539787	278784	276337	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC15C4.06c	cph1	SPBC15C4.06c	-	SPBC21H7.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523725	2542277	2539787	278746	276337	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC15C4.06c	dbr1	SPBC15C4.06c	-	SPBC21H7.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523726	2542032	2539787	278514	276337	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC15C4.06c	pnk1	SPBC15C4.06c	-	SPBC21H7.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523727	2541496	2539787	277998	276337	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC15C4.06c	arp42	SPBC15C4.06c	arp4	SPBC21H7.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523728	2543529	2539787	279947	276337	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC15C4.06c	ryh1	SPBC15C4.06c	hos1|sat7	SPBC21H7.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523729	2543384	2539787	279806	276337	SPAC637.06	SPBC15C4.06c	gmh5	SPBC15C4.06c	SPAC637.06	SPBC21H7.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523730	2543580	2539787	279995	276337	SPAC644.14c	SPBC15C4.06c	rad51	SPBC15C4.06c	rhp51	SPBC21H7.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523731	2539971	2539787	276515	276337	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC15C4.06c	cbp1	SPBC15C4.06c	abp1	SPBC21H7.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523732	2540106	2539911	276643	276456	SPBC12D12.09	SPBC15D4.10c	rev7	amo1	SPAC12D12.09	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523733	2542757	2539911	279207	276456	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC15D4.10c	mre11	amo1	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523734	2542311	2539911	278777	276456	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC15D4.10c	dad1	amo1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523735	2542363	2539911	278827	276456	SPAC1783.05	SPBC15D4.10c	hrp1	amo1	chd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.5245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523736	2542239	2539911	278711	276456	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC15D4.10c	chp1	amo1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523737	2542123	2539911	278599	276456	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC15D4.10c	mal3	amo1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523738	2542466	2539911	278927	276456	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC15D4.10c	nup40	amo1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.1733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523739	2542007	2539911	278490	276456	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC15D4.10c	rad57	amo1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523740	2542023	2539911	278506	276456	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC15D4.10c	ufd2	amo1	SPAC145.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.43	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523741	2541483	2539911	277985	276456	SPAC227.14	SPBC15D4.10c	SPAC227.14	amo1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523742	2541663	2539911	278159	276456	SPAC22G7.08	SPBC15D4.10c	ppk8	amo1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523743	2541531	2539911	278031	276456	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC15D4.10c	fft3	amo1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.2038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523744	2541614	2539911	278111	276456	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC15D4.10c	elp3	amo1	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523745	2542094	2539911	278571	276456	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC15D4.10c	rcd1	amo1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523746	2543101	2539911	279533	276456	SPAC323.03c	SPBC15D4.10c	SPAC323.03c	amo1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523747	2543210	2539911	279639	276456	SPAC3A11.03	SPBC15D4.10c	SPAC3A11.03	amo1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523748	2543452	2539911	279872	276456	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC15D4.10c	ssu72	amo1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.0739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523749	2543516	2539911	279934	276456	SPAC4F10.11	SPBC15D4.10c	spn1	amo1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523750	2543432	2539911	279852	276456	SPAC4G8.05	SPBC15D4.10c	ppk14	amo1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.9409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523751	2543317	2539911	279741	276456	SPAC823.14	SPBC15D4.10c	ptf1	amo1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523752	2543567	2539911	279983	276456	SPAC890.03	SPBC15D4.10c	ppk16	amo1	mug92	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523753	2543289	2539911	279714	276456	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC15D4.10c	rad26	amo1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523754	2539604	2539911	276162	276456	SPBC1105.14	SPBC15D4.10c	rsv2	amo1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523755	2539930	2539911	276474	276456	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC15D4.10c	reb1	amo1	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523756	2539668	2539911	276223	276456	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC15D4.10c	pht1	amo1	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523757	2539651	2539911	276206	276456	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC15D4.10c	srb11	amo1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.9976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523758	2539812	2539911	276362	276456	SPBC1347.02	SPBC15D4.10c	fkbp39	amo1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.6664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523759	2543263	2539960	279691	276504	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC15D4.15	med6	pho2	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523760	2542168	2539960	278643	276504	SPAC17A5.16	SPBC15D4.15	ftp105	pho2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523761	2542278	2539960	278747	276504	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC15D4.15	yaf9	pho2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523762	2542418	2539960	278881	276504	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC15D4.15	dad2	pho2	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523763	2541871	2539960	278361	276504	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC15D4.15	res2	pho2	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523764	2542032	2539960	278514	276504	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC15D4.15	pnk1	pho2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523765	2541578	2539960	278075	276504	SPAC25B8.05	SPBC15D4.15	deg1	pho2	SPAC25B8.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523766	2542701	2539960	279154	276504	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC15D4.15	mga2	pho2	SPAC26H5.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523767	2541614	2539960	278111	276504	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC15D4.15	elp3	pho2	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523768	2543044	2539960	279479	276504	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC15D4.15	tip1	pho2	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523769	2543452	2539960	279872	276504	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC15D4.15	ssu72	pho2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523770	2542571	2539960	279027	276504	SPAC589.02c	SPBC15D4.15	med13	pho2	spTrap240|srb9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523771	2543240	2539960	279668	276504	SPAC694.06c	SPBC15D4.15	mrc1	pho2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523772	2543289	2539960	279714	276504	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC15D4.15	rad26	pho2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523773	2539930	2539960	276474	276504	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC15D4.15	reb1	pho2	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523774	2539668	2539960	276223	276504	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC15D4.15	pht1	pho2	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523775	2539667	2539960	276222	276504	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC15D4.15	ash2	pho2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.6448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523776	2543263	2540209	279691	276742	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC1604.10	med6	srb7	pmc5	med21	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523777	2541578	2540209	278075	276742	SPAC25B8.05	SPBC1604.10	deg1	srb7	SPAC25B8.05	med21	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523778	2542701	2540209	279154	276742	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC1604.10	mga2	srb7	SPAC26H5.05	med21	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523779	2543263	2539857	279691	276404	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC1604.20c	med6	tea2	pmc5	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523780	2542757	2539857	279207	276404	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC1604.20c	mre11	tea2	rad32	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523781	2542349	2539857	278814	276404	SPAC1782.05	SPBC1604.20c	ypa2	tea2	SPAC1782.05|pta2	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523782	2542421	2539857	278884	276404	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC1604.20c	med20	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523783	2542418	2539857	278881	276404	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC1604.20c	dad2	tea2	hos2	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523784	2542513	2539857	278971	276404	SPAC1952.05	SPBC1604.20c	gcn5	tea2	kat2	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523785	2541871	2539857	278361	276404	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC1604.20c	res2	tea2	mcs1|pct1	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.3076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523786	2541776	2539857	278270	276404	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC1604.20c	swd1	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523787	2541614	2539857	278111	276404	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC1604.20c	elp3	tea2	kat9	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523788	2541672	2539857	278168	276404	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC1604.20c	lsk1	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523789	2543190	2539857	279619	276404	SPAC31F12.01	SPBC1604.20c	zds1	tea2	SPAC637.14|mug88	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.1445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523790	2543064	2539857	279497	276404	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC1604.20c	hrp3	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523791	2543529	2539857	279947	276404	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC1604.20c	ryh1	tea2	hos1|sat7	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523792	2542102	2539857	278578	276404	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC1604.20c	spc34	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523793	2539911	2539857	276456	276404	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC1604.20c	amo1	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523794	2541536	2540019	278036	276563	SPAC1071.02	SPBC1685.01	mms19	pmp1	-	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523795	2542135	2540019	278611	276563	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC1685.01	ubp8	pmp1	-	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523796	2542349	2540019	278814	276563	SPAC1782.05	SPBC1685.01	ypa2	pmp1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.7953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523797	2542421	2540019	278884	276563	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC1685.01	med20	pmp1	-	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523798	2542513	2540019	278971	276563	SPAC1952.05	SPBC1685.01	gcn5	pmp1	kat2	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523799	2542522	2540019	278980	276563	SPAC19A8.03	SPBC1685.01	ymr1	pmp1	SPAC19A8.03	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523800	2541871	2540019	278361	276563	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC1685.01	res2	pmp1	mcs1|pct1	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523801	2541496	2540019	277998	276563	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC1685.01	arp42	pmp1	arp4	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523802	2541578	2540019	278075	276563	SPAC25B8.05	SPBC1685.01	deg1	pmp1	SPAC25B8.05	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523803	2543619	2540019	280033	276563	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC1685.01	ypa1	pmp1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.1678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523804	2542571	2540019	279027	276563	SPAC589.02c	SPBC1685.01	med13	pmp1	spTrap240|srb9	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523805	2543384	2540019	279806	276563	SPAC637.06	SPBC1685.01	gmh5	pmp1	SPAC637.06	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523806	2542021	2540019	278504	276563	SPAP14E8.02	SPBC1685.01	tos4	pmp1	SPAP14E8.02	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523807	2539667	2540019	276222	276563	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC1685.01	ash2	pmp1	-	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523808	2539911	2540019	276456	276563	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC1685.01	amo1	pmp1	-	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523809	2543263	2539700	279691	276253	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC1685.15c	med6	klp6	pmc5	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.6089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523810	2541628	2539700	278124	276253	SPAC110.02	SPBC1685.15c	pds5	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523811	2542757	2539700	279207	276253	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC1685.15c	mre11	klp6	rad32	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523812	2542311	2539700	278777	276253	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC1685.15c	dad1	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.8729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523813	2542318	2539700	278784	276253	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC1685.15c	cph1	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523814	2542349	2539700	278814	276253	SPAC1782.05	SPBC1685.15c	ypa2	klp6	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523815	2542421	2539700	278884	276253	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC1685.15c	med20	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.8835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523816	2542278	2539700	278747	276253	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC1685.15c	yaf9	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523817	2542207	2539700	278682	276253	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC1685.15c	ddb1	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523818	2542418	2539700	278881	276253	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC1685.15c	dad2	klp6	hos2	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-24.2356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523819	2542237	2539700	278709	276253	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC1685.15c	fin1	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.7347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523820	2542007	2539700	278490	276253	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC1685.15c	rad57	klp6	rhp57|SPAC145.01	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523821	2541871	2539700	278361	276253	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC1685.15c	res2	klp6	mcs1|pct1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523822	2541856	2539700	278347	276253	SPAC23H3.08c	SPBC1685.15c	bub3	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-24.2425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523823	2541531	2539700	278031	276253	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1685.15c	fft3	klp6	snf2SR	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.5948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523824	2541672	2539700	278168	276253	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC1685.15c	lsk1	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523825	2543078	2539700	279511	276253	SPAC31A2.15c	SPBC1685.15c	dcc1	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.8191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523826	2543190	2539700	279619	276253	SPAC31F12.01	SPBC1685.15c	zds1	klp6	SPAC637.14|mug88	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523827	2543106	2539700	279538	276253	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC3A11.13	klp6	SPAC3H5.02	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523828	2543378	2539700	279800	276253	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC1685.15c	pac10	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523829	2543426	2539700	279846	276253	SPAC631.02	SPBC1685.15c	bdf2	klp6	SPAC631.02|nrc1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523830	2541633	2539700	278129	276253	SPAC664.01c	SPBC1685.15c	swi6	klp6	SPAC824.10c	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-18.217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523831	2543563	2539700	279979	276253	SPAC664.02c	SPBC1685.15c	arp8	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523832	2543240	2539700	279668	276253	SPAC694.06c	SPBC1685.15c	mrc1	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523833	2543117	2539700	279549	276253	SPAC806.08c	SPBC1685.15c	mod21	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523834	2543341	2539700	279764	276253	SPAC8E11.07c	SPBC1685.15c	alp31	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523835	2543387	2539700	279809	276253	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC1685.15c	mcl1	klp6	slr3	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.3187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523836	2543670	2539700	280084	276253	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC1685.15c	eme1	klp6	mms4|slx2	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523837	2539667	2539700	276222	276253	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC1685.15c	ash2	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523838	2542318	2540154	278784	276690	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC16C6.05	cph1	SPBC16C6.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523839	2542421	2540154	278884	276690	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC16C6.05	med20	SPBC16C6.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523840	2542278	2540154	278747	276690	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC16C6.05	yaf9	SPBC16C6.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523841	2542170	2540154	278645	276690	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC16C6.05	mst2	SPBC16C6.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523842	2542418	2540154	278881	276690	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC16C6.05	dad2	SPBC16C6.05	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523843	2542032	2540154	278514	276690	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC16C6.05	pnk1	SPBC16C6.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523844	2541496	2540154	277998	276690	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC16C6.05	arp42	SPBC16C6.05	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.6235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523845	2541776	2540154	278270	276690	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC16C6.05	swd1	SPBC16C6.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523846	2542094	2540154	278571	276690	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC16C6.05	rcd1	SPBC16C6.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523847	2543064	2540154	279497	276690	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC16C6.05	hrp3	SPBC16C6.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523848	2543384	2540154	279806	276690	SPAC637.06	SPBC16C6.05	gmh5	SPBC16C6.05	SPAC637.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523849	2539668	2540154	276223	276690	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC16C6.05	pht1	SPBC16C6.05	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523850	2539667	2540154	276222	276690	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC16C6.05	ash2	SPBC16C6.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.7077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523851	2539911	2540154	276456	276690	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC16C6.05	amo1	SPBC16C6.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.6229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523852	2542757	3361342	279207	280418	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC16D10.07c	mre11	sir2	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.5333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523853	2542239	3361342	278711	280418	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC16D10.07c	chp1	sir2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523854	2542007	3361342	278490	280418	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC16D10.07c	rad57	sir2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523855	2543240	3361342	279668	280418	SPAC694.06c	SPBC16D10.07c	mrc1	sir2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523856	2539911	3361342	276456	280418	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC16D10.07c	amo1	sir2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523857	2542925	2539956	279366	276500	SPAC11E3.04c	SPBC16E9.11c	ubc13	pub3	spu13|sst5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523858	2541713	2539956	278208	276500	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC16E9.11c	atp11	pub3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523859	2543263	2539733	279691	276285	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC16E9.12c	med6	pab2	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.0282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523860	2541536	2539733	278036	276285	SPAC1071.02	SPBC16E9.12c	mms19	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523861	2541628	2539733	278124	276285	SPAC110.02	SPBC16E9.12c	pds5	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523862	2541650	2539733	278146	276285	SPAC14C4.12c	SPBC16E9.12c	laf1	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523863	2542277	2539733	278746	276285	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC16E9.12c	dbr1	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.8077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523864	2542421	2539733	278884	276285	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC16E9.12c	med20	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523865	2542207	2539733	278682	276285	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC16E9.12c	ddb1	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523866	2542513	2539733	278971	276285	SPAC1952.05	SPBC16E9.12c	gcn5	pab2	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523867	2542555	2539733	279012	276285	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC1952.06c	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523868	2542126	2539733	278602	276285	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC16E9.12c	not3	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523869	2542459	2539733	278920	276285	SPAC1D4.03c	SPBC16E9.12c	aut12	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.0544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523870	2542007	2539733	278490	276285	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC16E9.12c	rad57	pab2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523871	2541899	2539733	278389	276285	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC16E9.12c	set3	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523872	2542032	2539733	278514	276285	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC16E9.12c	pnk1	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523873	2541496	2539733	277998	276285	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC16E9.12c	arp42	pab2	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.0324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523874	2541789	2539733	278281	276285	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC16E9.12c	iwr1	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523875	2541531	2539733	278031	276285	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC16E9.12c	fft3	pab2	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.8244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523876	2541614	2539733	278111	276285	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC16E9.12c	elp3	pab2	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523877	2541889	2539733	278379	276285	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC16E9.12c	pom1	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523878	2541801	2539733	278292	276285	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC16E9.12c	snf5	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523879	2543106	2539733	279538	276285	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC3A11.13	pab2	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523880	2543452	2539733	279872	276285	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC16E9.12c	ssu72	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.3619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523881	2543643	2539733	280057	276285	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC16E9.12c	hos2	pab2	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523882	2543443	2539733	279863	276285	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC16E9.12c	snt2	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523883	2543378	2539733	279800	276285	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC16E9.12c	pac10	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523884	2543616	2539733	280030	276285	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC16E9.12c	cwf21	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523885	2543529	2539733	279947	276285	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC16E9.12c	ryh1	pab2	hos1|sat7	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523886	2543426	2539733	279846	276285	SPAC631.02	SPBC16E9.12c	bdf2	pab2	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.2646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523887	2543580	2539733	279995	276285	SPAC644.14c	SPBC16E9.12c	rad51	pab2	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523888	2543563	2539733	279979	276285	SPAC664.02c	SPBC16E9.12c	arp8	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-21.8623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523889	2542845	2539733	279291	276285	SPAC824.04	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC824.04	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-19.9524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523890	2543341	2539733	279764	276285	SPAC8E11.07c	SPBC16E9.12c	alp31	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.3729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523891	2543372	2539733	279794	276285	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC16E9.12c	ase1	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.1285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523892	2543670	2539733	280084	276285	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC16E9.12c	eme1	pab2	mms4|slx2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523893	2539971	2539733	276515	276285	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC16E9.12c	cbp1	pab2	abp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.0406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523894	2539920	2539733	276464	276285	SPBC119.08	SPBC16E9.12c	pmk1	pab2	spm1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523895	2539930	2539733	276474	276285	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC16E9.12c	reb1	pab2	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523896	2539667	2539733	276222	276285	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC16E9.12c	ash2	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.2778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523897	2542809	2540118	279257	276655	SPAC15A10.11	SPBC16E9.17c	ubr11	rem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523898	2542349	2540118	278814	276655	SPAC1782.05	SPBC16E9.17c	ypa2	rem1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523899	2542207	2540118	278682	276655	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC16E9.17c	ddb1	rem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523900	2541531	2540118	278031	276655	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC16E9.17c	fft3	rem1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.86	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523901	2543384	2540118	279806	276655	SPAC637.06	SPBC16E9.17c	gmh5	rem1	SPAC637.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.0582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523902	2543580	2540118	279995	276655	SPAC644.14c	SPBC16E9.17c	rad51	rem1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523903	2539911	2540118	276456	276655	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC16E9.17c	amo1	rem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523904	2539911	2539998	276456	276542	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC16G5.03	amo1	SPBC16G5.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523905	2543529	2539843	279947	276391	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC16G5.11c	ryh1	bag101	hos1|sat7	bag1|bag1-a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523906	2543384	2539843	279806	276391	SPAC637.06	SPBC16G5.11c	gmh5	bag101	SPAC637.06	bag1|bag1-a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523907	2543670	2539843	280084	276391	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC16G5.11c	eme1	bag101	mms4|slx2	bag1|bag1-a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523908	2539911	2539843	276456	276391	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC16G5.11c	amo1	bag101	-	bag1|bag1-a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523909	2543263	2540067	279691	276605	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC16H5.05c	med6	cyp7	pmc5	cwf27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523910	2542277	2540067	278746	276605	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC16H5.05c	dbr1	cyp7	-	cwf27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9462	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523911	2542555	2540067	279012	276605	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC16H5.05c	SPAC1952.06c	cyp7	-	cwf27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523912	2541776	2540067	278270	276605	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC16H5.05c	swd1	cyp7	-	cwf27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523913	2543452	2540067	279872	276605	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC16H5.05c	ssu72	cyp7	-	cwf27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523914	2543619	2540067	280033	276605	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC16H5.05c	ypa1	cyp7	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	cwf27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523915	2543580	2540067	279995	276605	SPAC644.14c	SPBC16H5.05c	rad51	cyp7	rhp51	cwf27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523916	2540154	2540067	276690	276605	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC16H5.05c	SPBC16C6.05	cyp7	-	cwf27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523917	2543263	2539925	279691	276469	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC16H5.13	med6	SPBC16H5.13	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.3879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523918	2541536	2539925	278036	276469	SPAC1071.02	SPBC16H5.13	mms19	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.7926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523919	2541628	2539925	278124	276469	SPAC110.02	SPBC16H5.13	pds5	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523920	2541575	2539925	278072	276469	SPAC12B10.01c	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC12B10.01c	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523921	2542861	2539925	279307	276469	SPAC13G7.13c	SPBC16H5.13	msa1	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523922	2542277	2539925	278746	276469	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC16H5.13	dbr1	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523923	2542421	2539925	278884	276469	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC16H5.13	med20	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523924	3361506	2539925	280582	276469	SPAC17G8.09	SPBC16H5.13	shg1	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523925	2542239	2539925	278711	276469	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC16H5.13	chp1	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523926	2542513	2539925	278971	276469	SPAC1952.05	SPBC16H5.13	gcn5	SPBC16H5.13	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523927	2542459	2539925	278920	276469	SPAC1D4.03c	SPBC16H5.13	aut12	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523928	2541941	2539925	278428	276469	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC16H5.13	tfs1	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523929	2542066	2539925	278543	276469	SPAC227.05	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC227.05	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523930	2541899	2539925	278389	276469	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC16H5.13	set3	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.5597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523931	2541496	2539925	277998	276469	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC16H5.13	arp42	SPBC16H5.13	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523932	2541776	2539925	278270	276469	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC16H5.13	swd1	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523933	2541801	2539925	278292	276469	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC16H5.13	snf5	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523934	2543160	2539925	279591	276469	SPAC31A2.14	SPBC16H5.13	bun107	SPBC16H5.13	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.6312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523935	2543190	2539925	279619	276469	SPAC31F12.01	SPBC16H5.13	zds1	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC637.14|mug88	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523936	3361512	2539925	280588	276469	SPAC3C7.01c	SPBC16H5.13	sac12	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523937	2543452	2539925	279872	276469	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC16H5.13	ssu72	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523938	2543643	2539925	280057	276469	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC16H5.13	hos2	SPBC16H5.13	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523939	2543378	2539925	279800	276469	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC16H5.13	pac10	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523940	2543616	2539925	280030	276469	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC16H5.13	cwf21	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.2095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523941	2543619	2539925	280033	276469	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC16H5.13	ypa1	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523942	2543426	2539925	279846	276469	SPAC631.02	SPBC16H5.13	bdf2	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523943	2543580	2539925	279995	276469	SPAC644.14c	SPBC16H5.13	rad51	SPBC16H5.13	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523944	2543346	2539925	279768	276469	SPAC688.14	SPBC16H5.13	set13	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523945	2543240	2539925	279668	276469	SPAC694.06c	SPBC16H5.13	mrc1	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523946	2541470	2539925	277972	276469	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC16H5.13	rpb9	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523947	2539604	2539925	276162	276469	SPBC1105.14	SPBC16H5.13	rsv2	SPBC16H5.13	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523948	2539930	2539925	276474	276469	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC16H5.13	reb1	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523949	2539812	2539925	276362	276469	SPBC1347.02	SPBC16H5.13	fkbp39	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523950	2539667	2539925	276222	276469	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC16H5.13	ash2	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523951	2543240	2539949	279668	276493	SPAC694.06c	SPBC1703.04	mrc1	mlh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523952	2539667	2539949	276222	276493	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC1703.04	ash2	mlh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523953	2539787	2539949	276337	276493	SPBC15C4.06c	SPBC1703.04	SPBC15C4.06c	mlh1	SPBC21H7.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523954	2539733	2539949	276285	276493	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC1703.04	pab2	mlh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523955	2543240	2539959	279668	276503	SPAC694.06c	SPBC1703.11	mrc1	SPBC1703.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523956	2542309	2540032	278775	276575	SPAC16A10.02	SPBC1703.14c	sub1	top1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523957	2542278	2540032	278747	276575	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC1703.14c	yaf9	top1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523958	2542207	2540032	278682	276575	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC1703.14c	ddb1	top1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523959	2541496	2540032	277998	276575	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC1703.14c	arp42	top1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523960	2543529	2540032	279947	276575	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC1703.14c	ryh1	top1	hos1|sat7	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523961	2543240	2540032	279668	276575	SPAC694.06c	SPBC1703.14c	mrc1	top1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523962	2539971	2540032	276515	276575	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC1703.14c	cbp1	top1	abp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.92	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523963	2539667	2540032	276222	276575	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC1703.14c	ash2	top1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523964	2543263	2539953	279691	276497	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC1709.11c	med6	png2	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523965	2542277	2539953	278746	276497	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC1709.11c	dbr1	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523966	2542421	2539953	278884	276497	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC1709.11c	med20	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523967	2542278	2539953	278747	276497	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC1709.11c	yaf9	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.6107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523968	2542555	2539953	279012	276497	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC1952.06c	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523969	2541899	2539953	278389	276497	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC1709.11c	set3	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.2971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523970	2541496	2539953	277998	276497	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC1709.11c	arp42	png2	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.8104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523971	2541531	2539953	278031	276497	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1709.11c	fft3	png2	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.5199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523972	2543190	2539953	279619	276497	SPAC31F12.01	SPBC1709.11c	zds1	png2	SPAC637.14|mug88	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523973	2543452	2539953	279872	276497	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC1709.11c	ssu72	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.6189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523974	2543643	2539953	280057	276497	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC1709.11c	hos2	png2	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.5933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523975	2543443	2539953	279863	276497	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC1709.11c	snt2	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.1953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523976	2543529	2539953	279947	276497	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC1709.11c	ryh1	png2	hos1|sat7	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523977	2543563	2539953	279979	276497	SPAC664.02c	SPBC1709.11c	arp8	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.3204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523978	2543226	2539953	279654	276497	SPAC6B12.05c	SPBC1709.11c	ies2	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523979	2542845	2539953	279291	276497	SPAC824.04	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC824.04	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.3731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523980	2539971	2539953	276515	276497	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC1709.11c	cbp1	png2	abp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523981	2539930	2539953	276474	276497	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC1709.11c	reb1	png2	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523982	2539667	2539953	276222	276497	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC1709.11c	ash2	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.4538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523983	2539911	2539953	276456	276497	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC1709.11c	amo1	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.0475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523984	2539733	2539953	276285	276497	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC1709.11c	pab2	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523985	2540118	2539953	276655	276497	SPBC16E9.17c	SPBC1709.11c	rem1	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523986	2543240	2540064	279668	276602	SPAC694.06c	SPBC1718.02	mrc1	hop1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523987	2539679	2540064	276234	276602	SPBC12C2.05c	SPBC1718.02	bzz1	hop1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523988	2539787	2540064	276337	276602	SPBC15C4.06c	SPBC1718.02	SPBC15C4.06c	hop1	SPBC21H7.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523989	2540067	2540064	276605	276602	SPBC16H5.05c	SPBC1718.02	cyp7	hop1	cwf27	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523990	2539949	2540064	276493	276602	SPBC1703.04	SPBC1718.02	mlh1	hop1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523991	2539959	2540064	276503	276602	SPBC1703.11	SPBC1718.02	SPBC1703.11	hop1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523992	2540032	2540064	276575	276602	SPBC1703.14c	SPBC1718.02	top1	hop1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523993	2542318	2539876	278784	276422	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC1734.07c	cph1	trs8502	-	SPBC1734.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523994	2542513	2539876	278971	276422	SPAC1952.05	SPBC1734.07c	gcn5	trs8502	kat2	SPBC1734.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523995	2542519	2539876	278977	276422	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC1734.07c	scs7	trs8502	-	SPBC1734.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523996	2541536	2539999	278036	276543	SPAC1071.02	SPBC1734.15	mms19	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523997	2542757	2539999	279207	276543	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC1734.15	mre11	rsc4	rad32	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.3243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523998	2542278	2539999	278747	276543	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC1734.15	yaf9	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
523999	2542513	2539999	278971	276543	SPAC1952.05	SPBC1734.15	gcn5	rsc4	kat2	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524000	3361533	2539999	280609	276543	SPAC222.15	SPBC1734.15	meu13	rsc4	SPAC821.01	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524001	2542036	2539999	278518	276543	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC1734.15	hrq1	rsc4	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524002	2542032	2539999	278514	276543	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC1734.15	pnk1	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.2009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524003	2541496	2539999	277998	276543	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC1734.15	arp42	rsc4	arp4	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.7429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524004	2541776	2539999	278270	276543	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC1734.15	swd1	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.4953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524005	2541531	2539999	278031	276543	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1734.15	fft3	rsc4	snf2SR	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524006	2541578	2539999	278075	276543	SPAC25B8.05	SPBC1734.15	deg1	rsc4	SPAC25B8.05	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524007	2542701	2539999	279154	276543	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC1734.15	mga2	rsc4	SPAC26H5.05	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.3622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524008	2541614	2539999	278111	276543	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC1734.15	elp3	rsc4	kat9	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.5293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524009	2543044	2539999	279479	276543	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC1734.15	tip1	rsc4	noc1	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524010	2543064	2539999	279497	276543	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC1734.15	hrp3	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524011	2543384	2539999	279806	276543	SPAC637.06	SPBC1734.15	gmh5	rsc4	SPAC637.06	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524012	2543580	2539999	279995	276543	SPAC644.14c	SPBC1734.15	rad51	rsc4	rhp51	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524013	2543319	2539999	279743	276543	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC1734.15	trm10	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.8424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524014	2542845	2539999	279291	276543	SPAC824.04	SPBC1734.15	SPAC824.04	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.6724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524015	2543670	2539999	280084	276543	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC1734.15	eme1	rsc4	mms4|slx2	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524016	2539971	2539999	276515	276543	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC1734.15	cbp1	rsc4	abp1	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524017	2539930	2539999	276474	276543	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC1734.15	reb1	rsc4	SPBC660.01c	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.1595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524018	2539667	2539999	276222	276543	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC1734.15	ash2	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.4661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524019	2539857	2539999	276404	276543	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC1734.15	tea2	rsc4	klp4	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524020	2540019	2539999	276563	276543	SPBC1685.01	SPBC1734.15	pmp1	rsc4	dsp1	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524021	2540154	2539999	276690	276543	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC1734.15	SPBC16C6.05	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524022	2539733	2539999	276285	276543	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC1734.15	pab2	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524023	2543263	2540115	279691	276652	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC1778.02	med6	rap1	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524024	2542318	2540115	278784	276652	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC1778.02	cph1	rap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524025	2542170	2540115	278645	276652	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC1778.02	mst2	rap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524026	2542007	2540115	278490	276652	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC1778.02	rad57	rap1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.7912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524027	2542036	2540115	278518	276652	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC1778.02	hrq1	rap1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524028	2541496	2540115	277998	276652	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC1778.02	arp42	rap1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.5377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524029	2541656	2540115	278152	276652	SPAC25H1.06	SPBC1778.02	pcf3	rap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524030	2541614	2540115	278111	276652	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC1778.02	elp3	rap1	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524031	2543064	2540115	279497	276652	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC1778.02	hrp3	rap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.2042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524032	2543619	2540115	280033	276652	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC1778.02	ypa1	rap1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524033	2543426	2540115	279846	276652	SPAC631.02	SPBC1778.02	bdf2	rap1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524034	2543384	2540115	279806	276652	SPAC637.06	SPBC1778.02	gmh5	rap1	SPAC637.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524035	2543580	2540115	279995	276652	SPAC644.14c	SPBC1778.02	rad51	rap1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.3878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524036	2543563	2540115	279979	276652	SPAC664.02c	SPBC1778.02	arp8	rap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524037	2543240	2540115	279668	276652	SPAC694.06c	SPBC1778.02	mrc1	rap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524038	2543289	2540115	279714	276652	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC1778.02	rad26	rap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524039	2539668	2540115	276223	276652	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC1778.02	pht1	rap1	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524040	2539667	2540115	276222	276652	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC1778.02	ash2	rap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524041	2540154	2540115	276690	276652	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC1778.02	SPBC16C6.05	rap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524042	2542757	2540044	279207	276582	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC1778.04	mre11	spo6	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524043	2542007	2540044	278490	276582	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC1778.04	rad57	spo6	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524044	2539925	2540044	276469	276582	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC1778.04	SPBC16H5.13	spo6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524045	2541628	2540134	278124	276671	SPAC110.02	SPBC17A3.03c	pds5	SPBC17A3.03c	-	pi043	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524046	2542519	2540134	278977	276671	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC17A3.03c	scs7	SPBC17A3.03c	-	pi043	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524047	2541642	2539900	278138	276446	SPAC10F6.05c	SPBC17D11.02c	ubc6	hrd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524048	2542421	2539900	278884	276446	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC17D11.02c	med20	hrd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524049	2543240	2539900	279668	276446	SPAC694.06c	SPBC17D11.02c	mrc1	hrd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524050	2543263	2540077	279691	276615	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC17D11.04c	med6	nto1	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524051	2542421	2540077	278884	276615	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC17D11.04c	med20	nto1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524052	2542278	2540077	278747	276615	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC17D11.04c	yaf9	nto1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524053	2542513	2540077	278971	276615	SPAC1952.05	SPBC17D11.04c	gcn5	nto1	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.3687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524054	2542032	2540077	278514	276615	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC17D11.04c	pnk1	nto1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524055	2541496	2540077	277998	276615	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC17D11.04c	arp42	nto1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524056	2541776	2540077	278270	276615	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC17D11.04c	swd1	nto1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.7746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524057	2541531	2540077	278031	276615	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC17D11.04c	fft3	nto1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.1753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524058	2542701	2540077	279154	276615	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC17D11.04c	mga2	nto1	SPAC26H5.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524059	2543619	2540077	280033	276615	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC17D11.04c	ypa1	nto1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524060	2543240	2540077	279668	276615	SPAC694.06c	SPBC17D11.04c	mrc1	nto1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.0842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524061	2542845	2540077	279291	276615	SPAC824.04	SPBC17D11.04c	SPAC824.04	nto1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524062	2539930	2540077	276474	276615	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC17D11.04c	reb1	nto1	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524063	2539668	2540077	276223	276615	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC17D11.04c	pht1	nto1	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524064	2539773	2540077	276324	276615	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC17D11.04c	med7	nto1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524065	2540154	2540077	276690	276615	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC17D11.04c	SPBC16C6.05	nto1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524066	2539925	2540077	276469	276615	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC17D11.04c	SPBC16H5.13	nto1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524067	2539953	2540077	276497	276615	SPBC1709.11c	SPBC17D11.04c	png2	nto1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524068	3361561	2539714	280637	276267	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC1861.07	swr1	SPBC1861.07	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.2181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524069	2541575	2539714	278072	276267	SPAC12B10.01c	SPBC1861.07	SPAC12B10.01c	SPBC1861.07	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524070	2542277	2539714	278746	276267	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC1861.07	dbr1	SPBC1861.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524071	2542278	2539714	278747	276267	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC1861.07	yaf9	SPBC1861.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.0837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524072	2542513	2539714	278971	276267	SPAC1952.05	SPBC1861.07	gcn5	SPBC1861.07	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.0718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524073	2541496	2539714	277998	276267	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC1861.07	arp42	SPBC1861.07	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524074	2541776	2539714	278270	276267	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC1861.07	swd1	SPBC1861.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524075	2541614	2539714	278111	276267	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC1861.07	elp3	SPBC1861.07	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524076	2542094	2539714	278571	276267	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC1861.07	rcd1	SPBC1861.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524077	2541672	2539714	278168	276267	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC1861.07	lsk1	SPBC1861.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.8949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524078	2542516	2539714	278974	276267	SPAC2F7.04	SPBC1861.07	pmc2	SPBC1861.07	med1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524079	2541801	2539714	278292	276267	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC1861.07	snf5	SPBC1861.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524080	2543190	2539714	279619	276267	SPAC31F12.01	SPBC1861.07	zds1	SPBC1861.07	SPAC637.14|mug88	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524081	2541710	2539714	278205	276267	SPAC343.11c	SPBC1861.07	msc1	SPBC1861.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524082	2543064	2539714	279497	276267	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC1861.07	hrp3	SPBC1861.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524083	2543452	2539714	279872	276267	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC1861.07	ssu72	SPBC1861.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.8246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524084	2543616	2539714	280030	276267	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC1861.07	cwf21	SPBC1861.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524085	2543426	2539714	279846	276267	SPAC631.02	SPBC1861.07	bdf2	SPBC1861.07	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524086	2543580	2539714	279995	276267	SPAC644.14c	SPBC1861.07	rad51	SPBC1861.07	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.0012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524087	2542845	2539714	279291	276267	SPAC824.04	SPBC1861.07	SPAC824.04	SPBC1861.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524088	2543289	2539714	279714	276267	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC1861.07	rad26	SPBC1861.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524089	2539604	2539714	276162	276267	SPBC1105.14	SPBC1861.07	rsv2	SPBC1861.07	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524090	2539668	2539714	276223	276267	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC1861.07	pht1	SPBC1861.07	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524091	2539733	2539714	276285	276267	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC1861.07	pab2	SPBC1861.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.1088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524092	2540115	2539714	276652	276267	SPBC1778.02	SPBC1861.07	rap1	SPBC1861.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524093	2540077	2539714	276615	276267	SPBC17D11.04c	SPBC1861.07	nto1	SPBC1861.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524094	2541536	2540822	278036	277340	SPAC1071.02	SPBC18E5.05c	mms19	elp5	-	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524095	2541628	2540822	278124	277340	SPAC110.02	SPBC18E5.05c	pds5	elp5	-	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524096	2541580	2540822	278077	277340	SPAC1687.05	SPBC18E5.05c	pli1	elp5	-	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.6506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524097	2542318	2540822	278784	277340	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC18E5.05c	cph1	elp5	-	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.1555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524098	2542277	2540822	278746	277340	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC18E5.05c	dbr1	elp5	-	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524099	2542168	2540822	278643	277340	SPAC17A5.16	SPBC18E5.05c	ftp105	elp5	-	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524100	2542278	2540822	278747	277340	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC18E5.05c	yaf9	elp5	-	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524101	3361506	2540822	280582	277340	SPAC17G8.09	SPBC18E5.05c	shg1	elp5	-	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524102	2542207	2540822	278682	277340	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC18E5.05c	ddb1	elp5	-	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524103	2542463	2540822	278924	277340	SPAC1834.03c	SPBC18E5.05c	hhf1	elp5	h4.1	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524104	2542195	2540822	278670	277340	SPAC1834.07	SPBC18E5.05c	klp3	elp5	krp1	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524105	2542469	2540822	278930	277340	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC18E5.05c	erg5	elp5	cyp61	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524106	2542519	2540822	278977	277340	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC18E5.05c	scs7	elp5	-	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524107	2542007	2540822	278490	277340	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC18E5.05c	rad57	elp5	rhp57|SPAC145.01	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524108	2541899	2540822	278389	277340	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC18E5.05c	set3	elp5	-	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524109	2542032	2540822	278514	277340	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC18E5.05c	pnk1	elp5	-	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.5845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524110	2541872	2540822	278362	277340	SPAC23H4.10c	SPBC18E5.05c	thi4	elp5	-	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524111	2541531	2540822	278031	277340	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC18E5.05c	fft3	elp5	snf2SR	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.5412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524112	2541801	2540822	278292	277340	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC18E5.05c	snf5	elp5	-	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.5043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524113	2543190	2540822	279619	277340	SPAC31F12.01	SPBC18E5.05c	zds1	elp5	SPAC637.14|mug88	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.0407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524114	2541713	2540822	278208	277340	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC18E5.05c	atp11	elp5	-	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524115	2543686	2540822	280100	277340	SPAC3C7.14c	SPBC18E5.05c	obr1	elp5	apt1|uhp1|p25	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524116	2543452	2540822	279872	277340	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC18E5.05c	ssu72	elp5	-	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524117	2543643	2540822	280057	277340	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC18E5.05c	hos2	elp5	hda1|phd1	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524118	2543580	2540822	279995	277340	SPAC644.14c	SPBC18E5.05c	rad51	elp5	rhp51	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524119	2541633	2540822	278129	277340	SPAC664.01c	SPBC18E5.05c	swi6	elp5	SPAC824.10c	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524120	2543563	2540822	279979	277340	SPAC664.02c	SPBC18E5.05c	arp8	elp5	-	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524121	2543544	2540822	279961	277340	SPAC664.07c	SPBC18E5.05c	rad9	elp5	-	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524122	2543226	2540822	279654	277340	SPAC6B12.05c	SPBC18E5.05c	ies2	elp5	-	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524123	2542198	2540822	278673	277340	SPAC6F12.09	SPBC18E5.05c	rdp1	elp5	rdr1	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.8638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524124	2542845	2540822	279291	277340	SPAC824.04	SPBC18E5.05c	SPAC824.04	elp5	-	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524125	2543530	2540822	279948	277340	SPAC926.07c	SPBC18E5.05c	dlc2	elp5	-	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524126	2543670	2540822	280084	277340	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC18E5.05c	eme1	elp5	mms4|slx2	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524127	2540060	2540822	276598	277340	SPBC106.01	SPBC18E5.05c	mph1	elp5	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524128	2539920	2540822	276464	277340	SPBC119.08	SPBC18E5.05c	pmk1	elp5	spm1	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524129	2539930	2540822	276474	277340	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC18E5.05c	reb1	elp5	SPBC660.01c	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.2308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524130	2539668	2540822	276223	277340	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC18E5.05c	pht1	elp5	pi001	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.1682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524131	2539667	2540822	276222	277340	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC18E5.05c	ash2	elp5	-	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524132	2539911	2540822	276456	277340	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC18E5.05c	amo1	elp5	-	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524133	2539949	2540822	276493	277340	SPBC1703.04	SPBC18E5.05c	mlh1	elp5	-	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524134	2540064	2540822	276602	277340	SPBC1718.02	SPBC18E5.05c	hop1	elp5	-	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524135	2539999	2540822	276543	277340	SPBC1734.15	SPBC18E5.05c	rsc4	elp5	brd1	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.6283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524136	2540115	2540822	276652	277340	SPBC1778.02	SPBC18E5.05c	rap1	elp5	-	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524137	2540044	2540822	276582	277340	SPBC1778.04	SPBC18E5.05c	spo6	elp5	-	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524138	2539714	2540822	276267	277340	SPBC1861.07	SPBC18E5.05c	SPBC1861.07	elp5	-	iki1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.0632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524139	2543580	2540832	279995	277350	SPAC644.14c	SPBC18H10.05	rad51	SPBC18H10.05	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524140	2539971	2540832	276515	277350	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC18H10.05	cbp1	SPBC18H10.05	abp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524141	2539785	2540832	276335	277350	SPBC1773.16c	SPBC18H10.05	SPBC1773.16c	SPBC18H10.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524142	2541536	2540788	278036	277307	SPAC1071.02	SPBC18H10.06c	mms19	swd2	-	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.2686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524143	2541642	2540788	278138	277307	SPAC10F6.05c	SPBC18H10.06c	ubc6	swd2	-	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524144	2542757	2540788	279207	277307	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC18H10.06c	mre11	swd2	rad32	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524145	2542300	2540788	278767	277307	SPAC1687.22c	SPBC18H10.06c	puf3	swd2	SPAC222.02c	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524146	2542311	2540788	278777	277307	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC18H10.06c	dad1	swd2	-	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524147	2542349	2540788	278814	277307	SPAC1782.05	SPBC18H10.06c	ypa2	swd2	SPAC1782.05|pta2	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524148	2542421	2540788	278884	277307	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC18H10.06c	med20	swd2	-	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524149	2542278	2540788	278747	277307	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC18H10.06c	yaf9	swd2	-	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.2728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524150	2542170	2540788	278645	277307	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC18H10.06c	mst2	swd2	-	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524151	2542207	2540788	278682	277307	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC18H10.06c	ddb1	swd2	-	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524152	2542418	2540788	278881	277307	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC18H10.06c	dad2	swd2	hos2	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524153	2542123	2540788	278599	277307	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC18H10.06c	mal3	swd2	-	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524154	2542513	2540788	278971	277307	SPAC1952.05	SPBC18H10.06c	gcn5	swd2	kat2	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524155	2542555	2540788	279012	277307	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC1952.06c	swd2	-	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524156	2542541	2540788	278998	277307	SPAC1B3.03c	SPBC18H10.06c	wis2	swd2	cyp5	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524157	2542126	2540788	278602	277307	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC18H10.06c	not3	swd2	-	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524158	2542007	2540788	278490	277307	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC18H10.06c	rad57	swd2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524159	2542023	2540788	278506	277307	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC18H10.06c	ufd2	swd2	SPAC145.04	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524160	2541871	2540788	278361	277307	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC18H10.06c	res2	swd2	mcs1|pct1	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524161	2542032	2540788	278514	277307	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC18H10.06c	pnk1	swd2	-	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524162	2541496	2540788	277998	277307	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC18H10.06c	arp42	swd2	arp4	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.3266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524163	2541845	2540788	278336	277307	SPAC23G3.08c	SPBC18H10.06c	ubp7	swd2	-	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524164	2541531	2540788	278031	277307	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC18H10.06c	fft3	swd2	snf2SR	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.0957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524165	3361403	2540788	280479	277307	SPAC27D7.12c	SPBC18H10.06c	but1	swd2	SPAC27D7.12|mug107|prx	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524166	2541614	2540788	278111	277307	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC18H10.06c	elp3	swd2	kat9	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524167	2541672	2540788	278168	277307	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC18H10.06c	lsk1	swd2	-	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524168	2541889	2540788	278379	277307	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC18H10.06c	pom1	swd2	-	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524169	2543190	2540788	279619	277307	SPAC31F12.01	SPBC18H10.06c	zds1	swd2	SPAC637.14|mug88	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524170	2543044	2540788	279479	277307	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC18H10.06c	tip1	swd2	noc1	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524171	2543064	2540788	279497	277307	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC18H10.06c	hrp3	swd2	-	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.2696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524172	2543443	2540788	279863	277307	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC18H10.06c	snt2	swd2	-	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524173	2543616	2540788	280030	277307	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC18H10.06c	cwf21	swd2	-	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524174	2543529	2540788	279947	277307	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC18H10.06c	ryh1	swd2	hos1|sat7	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524175	2543619	2540788	280033	277307	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC18H10.06c	ypa1	swd2	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524176	2543516	2540788	279934	277307	SPAC4F10.11	SPBC18H10.06c	spn1	swd2	-	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524177	2543432	2540788	279852	277307	SPAC4G8.05	SPBC18H10.06c	ppk14	swd2	-	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524178	2543580	2540788	279995	277307	SPAC644.14c	SPBC18H10.06c	rad51	swd2	rhp51	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.5065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524179	2543563	2540788	279979	277307	SPAC664.02c	SPBC18H10.06c	arp8	swd2	-	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.5664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524180	2543317	2540788	279741	277307	SPAC823.14	SPBC18H10.06c	ptf1	swd2	-	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524181	2542845	2540788	279291	277307	SPAC824.04	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC824.04	swd2	-	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524182	2542102	2540788	278578	277307	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC18H10.06c	spc34	swd2	-	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524183	2542329	2540788	278795	277307	SPAC9G1.10c	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC9G1.10c	swd2	-	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524184	2542192	2540788	278667	277307	SPAC9G1.12	SPBC18H10.06c	cpd1	swd2	-	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524185	2543387	2540788	279809	277307	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC18H10.06c	mcl1	swd2	slr3	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524186	2543670	2540788	280084	277307	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC18H10.06c	eme1	swd2	mms4|slx2	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524187	2539930	2540788	276474	277307	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC18H10.06c	reb1	swd2	SPBC660.01c	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.5016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524188	2539857	2540788	276404	277307	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC18H10.06c	tea2	swd2	klp4	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.2667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524189	2540154	2540788	276690	277307	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC16C6.05	swd2	-	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524190	2540067	2540788	276605	277307	SPBC16H5.05c	SPBC18H10.06c	cyp7	swd2	cwf27	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524191	2539953	2540788	276497	277307	SPBC1709.11c	SPBC18H10.06c	png2	swd2	-	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524192	2539999	2540788	276543	277307	SPBC1734.15	SPBC18H10.06c	rsc4	swd2	brd1	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.2511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524193	2540077	2540788	276615	277307	SPBC17D11.04c	SPBC18H10.06c	nto1	swd2	-	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.0686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524194	2539714	2540788	276267	277307	SPBC1861.07	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC1861.07	swd2	-	swd2.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524195	2543263	2540837	279691	277355	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC18H10.08c	med6	ubp4	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524196	2542318	2540837	278784	277355	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC18H10.08c	cph1	ubp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524197	2542421	2540837	278884	277355	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC18H10.08c	med20	ubp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524198	2541496	2540837	277998	277355	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC18H10.08c	arp42	ubp4	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524199	2541776	2540837	278270	277355	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC18H10.08c	swd1	ubp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524200	2542059	2540837	278537	277355	SPAC328.06	SPBC18H10.08c	ubp2	ubp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.8025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524201	2543529	2540837	279947	277355	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC18H10.08c	ryh1	ubp4	hos1|sat7	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524202	2542513	2540799	278971	277318	SPAC1952.05	SPBC18H10.15	gcn5	cdk11	kat2	ppk23	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524203	2542126	2540799	278602	277318	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC18H10.15	not3	cdk11	-	ppk23	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524204	2541801	2540799	278292	277318	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC18H10.15	snf5	cdk11	-	ppk23	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524205	2539651	2540799	276206	277318	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC18H10.15	srb11	cdk11	-	ppk23	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524206	2539812	2540799	276362	277318	SPBC1347.02	SPBC18H10.15	fkbp39	cdk11	-	ppk23	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524207	2539911	2540799	276456	277318	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC18H10.15	amo1	cdk11	-	ppk23	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524208	2543263	2540787	279691	277306	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC1921.07c	med6	sgf29	pmc5	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.6051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524209	2541628	2540787	278124	277306	SPAC110.02	SPBC1921.07c	pds5	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524210	2542135	2540787	278611	277306	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC1921.07c	ubp8	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524211	2541529	2540787	278029	277306	SPAC1687.13c	SPBC1921.07c	csn5	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524212	2542318	2540787	278784	277306	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC1921.07c	cph1	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524213	2542168	2540787	278643	277306	SPAC17A5.16	SPBC1921.07c	ftp105	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.7091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524214	2542278	2540787	278747	277306	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC1921.07c	yaf9	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524215	2542170	2540787	278645	277306	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC1921.07c	mst2	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524216	2542207	2540787	278682	277306	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC1921.07c	ddb1	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524217	2542418	2540787	278881	277306	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC1921.07c	dad2	sgf29	hos2	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524218	2542123	2540787	278599	277306	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC1921.07c	mal3	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524219	2542127	2540787	278603	277306	SPAC1952.12c	SPBC1921.07c	csn71	sgf29	csn7|csn7a	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524220	2542126	2540787	278602	277306	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC1921.07c	not3	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524221	2542023	2540787	278506	277306	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC1921.07c	ufd2	sgf29	SPAC145.04	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524222	3361533	2540787	280609	277306	SPAC222.15	SPBC1921.07c	meu13	sgf29	SPAC821.01	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524223	2541871	2540787	278361	277306	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC1921.07c	res2	sgf29	mcs1|pct1	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524224	2541496	2540787	277998	277306	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC1921.07c	arp42	sgf29	arp4	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-18.4103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524225	2541776	2540787	278270	277306	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC1921.07c	swd1	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524226	2541531	2540787	278031	277306	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1921.07c	fft3	sgf29	snf2SR	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524227	2542701	2540787	279154	277306	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC1921.07c	mga2	sgf29	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524228	2541672	2540787	278168	277306	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC1921.07c	lsk1	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524229	2543101	2540787	279533	277306	SPAC323.03c	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC323.03c	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524230	2543044	2540787	279479	277306	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC1921.07c	tip1	sgf29	noc1	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524231	2543064	2540787	279497	277306	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC1921.07c	hrp3	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524232	2543426	2540787	279846	277306	SPAC631.02	SPBC1921.07c	bdf2	sgf29	SPAC631.02|nrc1	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524233	2543384	2540787	279806	277306	SPAC637.06	SPBC1921.07c	gmh5	sgf29	SPAC637.06	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524234	2543580	2540787	279995	277306	SPAC644.14c	SPBC1921.07c	rad51	sgf29	rhp51	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524235	2543319	2540787	279743	277306	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC1921.07c	trm10	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524236	2543387	2540787	279809	277306	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC1921.07c	mcl1	sgf29	slr3	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524237	2540060	2540787	276598	277306	SPBC106.01	SPBC1921.07c	mph1	sgf29	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524238	2539971	2540787	276515	277306	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC1921.07c	cbp1	sgf29	abp1	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.1226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524239	2539930	2540787	276474	277306	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC1921.07c	reb1	sgf29	SPBC660.01c	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524240	2539857	2540787	276404	277306	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC1921.07c	tea2	sgf29	klp4	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524241	2539700	2540787	276253	277306	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC1921.07c	klp6	sgf29	SPBC649.01c|sot2	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524242	2540154	2540787	276690	277306	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC16C6.05	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524243	2539999	2540787	276543	277306	SPBC1734.15	SPBC1921.07c	rsc4	sgf29	brd1	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.2121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524244	2540077	2540787	276615	277306	SPBC17D11.04c	SPBC1921.07c	nto1	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.2524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524245	2539714	2540787	276267	277306	SPBC1861.07	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC1861.07	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.7336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524246	2540788	2540787	277307	277306	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC1921.07c	swd2	sgf29	swd2.1	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524247	2540837	2540787	277355	277306	SPBC18H10.08c	SPBC1921.07c	ubp4	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524248	2543190	2540764	279619	277284	SPAC31F12.01	SPBC19C7.02	zds1	ubr1	SPAC637.14|mug88	SPBC32F12.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524249	2540788	2540764	277307	277284	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC19C7.02	swd2	ubr1	swd2.1	SPBC32F12.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524250	2542513	2540514	278971	277042	SPAC1952.05	SPBC19F5.02c	gcn5	utp4	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.9074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524251	2539911	2540514	276456	277042	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC19F5.02c	amo1	utp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524252	2540787	2540514	277306	277042	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC19F5.02c	sgf29	utp4	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.9434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524253	2541496	2540678	277998	277203	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC1A4.10c	arp42	pmc1	arp4	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524254	2541531	2540678	278031	277203	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1A4.10c	fft3	pmc1	snf2SR	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524255	2542701	2540678	279154	277203	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC1A4.10c	mga2	pmc1	SPAC26H5.05	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524256	2543670	2540678	280084	277203	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC1A4.10c	eme1	pmc1	mms4|slx2	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524257	2542318	2540765	278784	277285	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC1D7.01	cph1	pfd1	-	SPBC1D7.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524258	2542421	2540765	278884	277285	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC1D7.01	med20	pfd1	-	SPBC1D7.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524259	2542418	2540765	278881	277285	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC1D7.01	dad2	pfd1	hos2	SPBC1D7.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524260	2542237	2540765	278709	277285	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC1D7.01	fin1	pfd1	-	SPBC1D7.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524261	2541531	2540765	278031	277285	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1D7.01	fft3	pfd1	snf2SR	SPBC1D7.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524262	2542701	2540765	279154	277285	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC1D7.01	mga2	pfd1	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC1D7.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.7126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524263	2541889	2540765	278379	277285	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC1D7.01	pom1	pfd1	-	SPBC1D7.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524264	2543341	2540765	279764	277285	SPAC8E11.07c	SPBC1D7.01	alp31	pfd1	-	SPBC1D7.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.8514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524265	2543372	2540765	279794	277285	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC1D7.01	ase1	pfd1	-	SPBC1D7.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524266	2543263	2540612	279691	277138	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC1D7.05	med6	byr2	pmc5	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524267	2541642	2540612	278138	277138	SPAC10F6.05c	SPBC1D7.05	ubc6	byr2	-	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524268	2541628	2540612	278124	277138	SPAC110.02	SPBC1D7.05	pds5	byr2	-	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524269	2542757	2540612	279207	277138	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC1D7.05	mre11	byr2	rad32	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524270	2542788	2540612	279237	277138	SPAC15A10.15	SPBC1D7.05	sgo2	byr2	-	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524271	2542764	2540612	279214	277138	SPAC15E1.10	SPBC1D7.05	SPAC15E1.10	byr2	SPAP7G5.01	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524272	2542421	2540612	278884	277138	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC1D7.05	med20	byr2	-	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524273	2542513	2540612	278971	277138	SPAC1952.05	SPBC1D7.05	gcn5	byr2	kat2	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524274	2542519	2540612	278977	277138	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC1D7.05	scs7	byr2	-	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524275	2541531	2540612	278031	277138	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1D7.05	fft3	byr2	snf2SR	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524276	2543426	2540612	279846	277138	SPAC631.02	SPBC1D7.05	bdf2	byr2	SPAC631.02|nrc1	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524277	2543580	2540612	279995	277138	SPAC644.14c	SPBC1D7.05	rad51	byr2	rhp51	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524278	2543530	2540612	279948	277138	SPAC926.07c	SPBC1D7.05	dlc2	byr2	-	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524279	2539971	2540612	276515	277138	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC1D7.05	cbp1	byr2	abp1	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524280	2539667	2540612	276222	277138	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC1D7.05	ash2	byr2	-	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524281	2539714	2540612	276267	277138	SPBC1861.07	SPBC1D7.05	SPBC1861.07	byr2	-	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524282	2542418	2540589	278881	277115	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC20F10.06	dad2	mad2	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.7653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524283	2542237	2540589	278709	277115	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC20F10.06	fin1	mad2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-20.112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524284	2541633	2540589	278129	277115	SPAC664.01c	SPBC20F10.06	swi6	mad2	SPAC824.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524285	2543240	2540589	279668	277115	SPAC694.06c	SPBC20F10.06	mrc1	mad2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.7059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524286	2542102	2540589	278578	277115	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC20F10.06	spc34	mad2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.6742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524287	2542278	2540667	278747	277192	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC211.06	yaf9	gfh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524288	2542237	2540667	278709	277192	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC211.06	fin1	gfh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524289	2541672	2540667	278168	277192	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC211.06	lsk1	gfh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524290	2542318	2540664	278784	277189	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC215.02	cph1	bob1	-	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524291	2542278	2540664	278747	277189	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC215.02	yaf9	bob1	-	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524292	2542418	2540664	278881	277189	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC215.02	dad2	bob1	hos2	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524293	2542568	2540664	279024	277189	SPAC1952.02	SPBC215.02	tma23	bob1	SPAC1952.02	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524294	2541786	2540664	278278	277189	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC215.02	rok1	bob1	-	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524295	2541531	2540664	278031	277189	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC215.02	fft3	bob1	snf2SR	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.6279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524296	2542701	2540664	279154	277189	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC215.02	mga2	bob1	SPAC26H5.05	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524297	2543426	2540664	279846	277189	SPAC631.02	SPBC215.02	bdf2	bob1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524298	2543563	2540664	279979	277189	SPAC664.02c	SPBC215.02	arp8	bob1	-	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524299	2542102	2540664	278578	277189	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC215.02	spc34	bob1	-	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524300	2543341	2540664	279764	277189	SPAC8E11.07c	SPBC215.02	alp31	bob1	-	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-24.1267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524301	2543372	2540664	279794	277189	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC215.02	ase1	bob1	-	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524302	2539700	2540664	276253	277189	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC215.02	klp6	bob1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524303	2539733	2540664	276285	277189	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC215.02	pab2	bob1	-	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524304	2539925	2540664	276469	277189	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC215.02	SPBC16H5.13	bob1	-	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524305	2540678	2540664	277203	277189	SPBC1A4.10c	SPBC215.02	pmc1	bob1	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524306	2542757	2540352	279207	276881	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC215.03c	mre11	csn1	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.2882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524307	2541650	2540352	278146	276881	SPAC14C4.12c	SPBC215.03c	laf1	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524308	2541643	2540352	278139	276881	SPAC14C4.13	SPBC215.03c	rad17	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.1081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524309	2542318	2540352	278784	276881	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC215.03c	cph1	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.5197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524310	2542363	2540352	278827	276881	SPAC1783.05	SPBC215.03c	hrp1	csn1	chd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524311	2542278	2540352	278747	276881	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC215.03c	yaf9	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.6233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524312	2542418	2540352	278881	276881	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC215.03c	dad2	csn1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524313	2542513	2540352	278971	276881	SPAC1952.05	SPBC215.03c	gcn5	csn1	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524314	2542519	2540352	278977	276881	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC215.03c	scs7	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.0397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524315	2542126	2540352	278602	276881	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC215.03c	not3	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.8977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524316	2541746	2540352	278240	276881	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC215.03c	hus1	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.1233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524317	2541496	2540352	277998	276881	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC215.03c	arp42	csn1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.3319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524318	2541531	2540352	278031	276881	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC215.03c	fft3	csn1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524319	2542094	2540352	278571	276881	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC215.03c	rcd1	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.0094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524320	2541672	2540352	278168	276881	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC215.03c	lsk1	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524321	2543452	2540352	279872	276881	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC215.03c	ssu72	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524322	2541542	2540352	278042	276881	SPAC4G9.02	SPBC215.03c	rnh201	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524323	2543563	2540352	279979	276881	SPAC664.02c	SPBC215.03c	arp8	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524324	2543544	2540352	279961	276881	SPAC664.07c	SPBC215.03c	rad9	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.8199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524325	2543668	2540352	280082	276881	SPAC9.05	SPBC215.03c	fml1	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524326	2543289	2540352	279714	276881	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC215.03c	rad26	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.2025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524327	2543387	2540352	279809	276881	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC215.03c	mcl1	csn1	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.7107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524328	2543463	2540352	279883	276881	SPAPB21F2.03	SPBC215.03c	slx9	csn1	SPAPB21F2.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524329	2540060	2540352	276598	276881	SPBC106.01	SPBC215.03c	mph1	csn1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524330	2539700	2540352	276253	276881	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC215.03c	klp6	csn1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524331	2539733	2540352	276285	276881	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC215.03c	pab2	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524332	2539925	2540352	276469	276881	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC215.03c	SPBC16H5.13	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524333	2540032	2540352	276575	276881	SPBC1703.14c	SPBC215.03c	top1	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524334	2540788	2540352	277307	276881	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC215.03c	swd2	csn1	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524335	2540787	2540352	277306	276881	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC215.03c	sgf29	csn1	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524336	2540678	2540352	277203	276881	SPBC1A4.10c	SPBC215.03c	pmc1	csn1	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524337	2541536	2540669	278036	277194	SPAC1071.02	SPBC215.13	mms19	SPBC215.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524338	2542032	2540669	278514	277194	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC215.13	pnk1	SPBC215.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524339	2541531	2540669	278031	277194	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC215.13	fft3	SPBC215.13	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524340	2539971	2540669	276515	277194	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC215.13	cbp1	SPBC215.13	abp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524341	2542809	2540588	279257	277114	SPAC15A10.11	SPBC21B10.12	ubr11	rec6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524342	2543263	2540686	279691	277211	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC21D10.10	med6	bdc1	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.4595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524343	2541536	2540686	278036	277211	SPAC1071.02	SPBC21D10.10	mms19	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524344	2541573	2540686	278070	277211	SPAC16.04	SPBC21D10.10	dus3	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524345	2542349	2540686	278814	277211	SPAC1782.05	SPBC21D10.10	ypa2	bdc1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.6281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524346	2542168	2540686	278643	277211	SPAC17A5.16	SPBC21D10.10	ftp105	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524347	2542421	2540686	278884	277211	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC21D10.10	med20	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.7639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524348	2542278	2540686	278747	277211	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC21D10.10	yaf9	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-19.4973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524349	2542170	2540686	278645	277211	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC21D10.10	mst2	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524350	2542207	2540686	278682	277211	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC21D10.10	ddb1	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524351	2542418	2540686	278881	277211	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC21D10.10	dad2	bdc1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524352	2542568	2540686	279024	277211	SPAC1952.02	SPBC21D10.10	tma23	bdc1	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524353	2542513	2540686	278971	277211	SPAC1952.05	SPBC21D10.10	gcn5	bdc1	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524354	2542522	2540686	278980	277211	SPAC19A8.03	SPBC21D10.10	ymr1	bdc1	SPAC19A8.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524355	2542469	2540686	278930	277211	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC21D10.10	erg5	bdc1	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524356	2542007	2540686	278490	277211	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC21D10.10	rad57	bdc1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524357	2542066	2540686	278543	277211	SPAC227.05	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC227.05	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524358	2541899	2540686	278389	277211	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC21D10.10	set3	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524359	2541786	2540686	278278	277211	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC21D10.10	rok1	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524360	2541871	2540686	278361	277211	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC21D10.10	res2	bdc1	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524361	2542032	2540686	278514	277211	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC21D10.10	pnk1	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.2951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524362	2541496	2540686	277998	277211	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC21D10.10	arp42	bdc1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.5203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524363	2541776	2540686	278270	277211	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC21D10.10	swd1	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-18.189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524364	2541531	2540686	278031	277211	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC21D10.10	fft3	bdc1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.9286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524365	2541614	2540686	278111	277211	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC21D10.10	elp3	bdc1	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524366	2541889	2540686	278379	277211	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC21D10.10	pom1	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524367	2543160	2540686	279591	277211	SPAC31A2.14	SPBC21D10.10	bun107	bdc1	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524368	2543190	2540686	279619	277211	SPAC31F12.01	SPBC21D10.10	zds1	bdc1	SPAC637.14|mug88	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524369	2543106	2540686	279538	277211	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC3A11.13	bdc1	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524370	2543643	2540686	280057	277211	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC21D10.10	hos2	bdc1	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524371	2543443	2540686	279863	277211	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC21D10.10	snt2	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-19.1403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524372	2543378	2540686	279800	277211	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC21D10.10	pac10	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524373	2543384	2540686	279806	277211	SPAC637.06	SPBC21D10.10	gmh5	bdc1	SPAC637.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524374	2543580	2540686	279995	277211	SPAC644.14c	SPBC21D10.10	rad51	bdc1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524375	2543563	2540686	279979	277211	SPAC664.02c	SPBC21D10.10	arp8	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-19.9768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524376	2542845	2540686	279291	277211	SPAC824.04	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC824.04	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524377	2543372	2540686	279794	277211	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC21D10.10	ase1	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524378	2543387	2540686	279809	277211	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC21D10.10	mcl1	bdc1	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.0524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524379	2539930	2540686	276474	277211	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC21D10.10	reb1	bdc1	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.0209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524380	2539668	2540686	276223	277211	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC21D10.10	pht1	bdc1	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524381	2539857	2540686	276404	277211	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC21D10.10	tea2	bdc1	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524382	2540019	2540686	276563	277211	SPBC1685.01	SPBC21D10.10	pmp1	bdc1	dsp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524383	2540154	2540686	276690	277211	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC16C6.05	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524384	2539999	2540686	276543	277211	SPBC1734.15	SPBC21D10.10	rsc4	bdc1	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524385	2540077	2540686	276615	277211	SPBC17D11.04c	SPBC21D10.10	nto1	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524386	2540788	2540686	277307	277211	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC21D10.10	swd2	bdc1	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-19.044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524387	2540664	2540686	277189	277211	SPBC215.02	SPBC21D10.10	bob1	bdc1	gim5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524388	2540352	2540686	276881	277211	SPBC215.03c	SPBC21D10.10	csn1	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524389	2540653	2540686	277178	277211	SPBC215.07c	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC215.07c	bdc1	pdp2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524390	2541536	2540531	278036	277059	SPAC1071.02	SPBC23E6.08	mms19	sat1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524391	2542014	2540531	278497	277059	SPAC20H4.04	SPBC23E6.08	fml2	sat1	mfh2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524392	2541845	2540531	278336	277059	SPAC23G3.08c	SPBC23E6.08	ubp7	sat1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524393	2543160	2540531	279591	277059	SPAC31A2.14	SPBC23E6.08	bun107	sat1	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524394	2543619	2540531	280033	277059	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC23E6.08	ypa1	sat1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524395	2542102	2540531	278578	277059	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC23E6.08	spc34	sat1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524396	2539679	2540531	276234	277059	SPBC12C2.05c	SPBC23E6.08	bzz1	sat1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524397	2539726	2540531	276278	277059	SPBC13E7.08c	SPBC23E6.08	leo1	sat1	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524398	2539700	2540531	276253	277059	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC23E6.08	klp6	sat1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.2051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524399	2541536	2540317	278036	276847	SPAC1071.02	SPBC24C6.05	mms19	sec28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524400	2542135	2540317	278611	276847	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC24C6.05	ubp8	sec28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524401	2542840	2540317	279286	276847	SPAC13G6.08	SPBC24C6.05	SPAC13G6.08	sec28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524402	2541650	2540317	278146	276847	SPAC14C4.12c	SPBC24C6.05	laf1	sec28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524403	2542278	2540317	278747	276847	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC24C6.05	yaf9	sec28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524404	2542295	2540317	278763	276847	SPAC17H9.03c	SPBC24C6.05	rdl1	sec28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524405	2542513	2540317	278971	276847	SPAC1952.05	SPBC24C6.05	gcn5	sec28	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524406	2542466	2540317	278927	276847	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC24C6.05	nup40	sec28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.79	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524407	2542126	2540317	278602	276847	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC24C6.05	not3	sec28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524408	2541899	2540317	278389	276847	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC24C6.05	set3	sec28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.2181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524409	2541786	2540317	278278	276847	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC24C6.05	rok1	sec28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.0016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524410	2541789	2540317	278281	276847	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC24C6.05	iwr1	sec28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524411	2541531	2540317	278031	276847	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC24C6.05	fft3	sec28	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524412	2541614	2540317	278111	276847	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC24C6.05	elp3	sec28	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.8171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524413	2542516	2540317	278974	276847	SPAC2F7.04	SPBC24C6.05	pmc2	sec28	med1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524414	2543160	2540317	279591	276847	SPAC31A2.14	SPBC24C6.05	bun107	sec28	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524415	2543643	2540317	280057	276847	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC24C6.05	hos2	sec28	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524416	2543443	2540317	279863	276847	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC24C6.05	snt2	sec28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524417	2543616	2540317	280030	276847	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC24C6.05	cwf21	sec28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524418	2543567	2540317	279983	276847	SPAC890.03	SPBC24C6.05	ppk16	sec28	mug92	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524419	2541470	2540317	277972	276847	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC24C6.05	rpb9	sec28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524420	2539920	2540317	276464	276847	SPBC119.08	SPBC24C6.05	pmk1	sec28	spm1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524421	2539857	2540317	276404	276847	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC24C6.05	tea2	sec28	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524422	2539700	2540317	276253	276847	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC24C6.05	klp6	sec28	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524423	2539999	2540317	276543	276847	SPBC1734.15	SPBC24C6.05	rsc4	sec28	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524424	2539714	2540317	276267	276847	SPBC1861.07	SPBC24C6.05	SPBC1861.07	sec28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524425	2540788	2540317	277307	276847	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC24C6.05	swd2	sec28	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524426	2543263	2540680	279691	277205	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC26H8.05c	med6	pph3	pmc5	SPBC26H8.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524427	2541628	2540680	278124	277205	SPAC110.02	SPBC26H8.05c	pds5	pph3	-	SPBC26H8.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524428	5802929	2540680	858067	277205	SPAC1556.08c	SPBC26H8.05c	cbs2	pph3	SPAC1F12.01c	SPBC26H8.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524429	2542239	2540680	278711	277205	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC26H8.05c	chp1	pph3	-	SPBC26H8.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524430	2542237	2540680	278709	277205	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC26H8.05c	fin1	pph3	-	SPBC26H8.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524431	2541496	2540680	277998	277205	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC26H8.05c	arp42	pph3	arp4	SPBC26H8.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524432	2542701	2540680	279154	277205	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC26H8.05c	mga2	pph3	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC26H8.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.0584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524433	2541889	2540680	278379	277205	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC26H8.05c	pom1	pph3	-	SPBC26H8.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524434	2543616	2540680	280030	277205	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC26H8.05c	cwf21	pph3	-	SPBC26H8.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524435	2541633	2540680	278129	277205	SPAC664.01c	SPBC26H8.05c	swi6	pph3	SPAC824.10c	SPBC26H8.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.6457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524436	2543240	2540680	279668	277205	SPAC694.06c	SPBC26H8.05c	mrc1	pph3	-	SPBC26H8.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524437	2542198	2540680	278673	277205	SPAC6F12.09	SPBC26H8.05c	rdp1	pph3	rdr1	SPBC26H8.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524438	2539930	2540680	276474	277205	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC26H8.05c	reb1	pph3	SPBC660.01c	SPBC26H8.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524439	2539911	2540680	276456	277205	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC26H8.05c	amo1	pph3	-	SPBC26H8.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524440	2543263	2540498	279691	277026	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC27.02c	med6	ask1	pmc5	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-19.1582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524441	2541628	2540498	278124	277026	SPAC110.02	SPBC27.02c	pds5	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524442	3361561	2540498	280637	277026	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC27.02c	swr1	ask1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.5483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524443	2542757	2540498	279207	277026	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC27.02c	mre11	ask1	rad32	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524444	2541650	2540498	278146	277026	SPAC14C4.12c	SPBC27.02c	laf1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524445	2541580	2540498	278077	277026	SPAC1687.05	SPBC27.02c	pli1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.11	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524446	2542300	2540498	278767	277026	SPAC1687.22c	SPBC27.02c	puf3	ask1	SPAC222.02c	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524447	2542311	2540498	278777	277026	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC27.02c	dad1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524448	2542318	2540498	278784	277026	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC27.02c	cph1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-18.8328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524449	2542363	2540498	278827	277026	SPAC1783.05	SPBC27.02c	hrp1	ask1	chd1	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524450	2542277	2540498	278746	277026	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC27.02c	dbr1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524451	2542421	2540498	278884	277026	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC27.02c	med20	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.5811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524452	2542278	2540498	278747	277026	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC27.02c	yaf9	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-19.6536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524453	2542207	2540498	278682	277026	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC27.02c	ddb1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524454	2542463	2540498	278924	277026	SPAC1834.03c	SPBC27.02c	hhf1	ask1	h4.1	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524455	2542123	2540498	278599	277026	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC27.02c	mal3	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.2751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524456	2542568	2540498	279024	277026	SPAC1952.02	SPBC27.02c	tma23	ask1	SPAC1952.02	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524457	2542466	2540498	278927	277026	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC27.02c	nup40	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524458	2542237	2540498	278709	277026	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC27.02c	fin1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524459	2542519	2540498	278977	277026	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC27.02c	scs7	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.2658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524460	2542126	2540498	278602	277026	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC27.02c	not3	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.8543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524461	2542007	2540498	278490	277026	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC27.02c	rad57	ask1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524462	2542023	2540498	278506	277026	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC27.02c	ufd2	ask1	SPAC145.04	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524463	2541899	2540498	278389	277026	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC27.02c	set3	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524464	2541871	2540498	278361	277026	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC27.02c	res2	ask1	mcs1|pct1	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524465	2542036	2540498	278518	277026	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC27.02c	hrq1	ask1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524466	2542032	2540498	278514	277026	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC27.02c	pnk1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524467	2541496	2540498	277998	277026	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC27.02c	arp42	ask1	arp4	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524468	2541776	2540498	278270	277026	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC27.02c	swd1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.6673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524469	2541856	2540498	278347	277026	SPAC23H3.08c	SPBC27.02c	bub3	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.5969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524470	2541531	2540498	278031	277026	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC27.02c	fft3	ask1	snf2SR	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.4656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524471	2542732	2540498	279182	277026	SPAC25G10.07c	SPBC27.02c	cut7	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.3316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524472	2542081	2540498	278558	277026	SPAC26H5.04	SPBC27.02c	SPAC26H5.04	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.98	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524473	2542701	2540498	279154	277026	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC27.02c	mga2	ask1	SPAC26H5.05	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524474	2541889	2540498	278379	277026	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC27.02c	pom1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524475	2542516	2540498	278974	277026	SPAC2F7.04	SPBC27.02c	pmc2	ask1	med1	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524476	2543078	2540498	279511	277026	SPAC31A2.15c	SPBC27.02c	dcc1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524477	2543190	2540498	279619	277026	SPAC31F12.01	SPBC27.02c	zds1	ask1	SPAC637.14|mug88	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.34	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524478	2541710	2540498	278205	277026	SPAC343.11c	SPBC27.02c	msc1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.7066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524479	2543106	2540498	279538	277026	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC27.02c	SPAC3A11.13	ask1	SPAC3H5.02	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.2484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524480	2543044	2540498	279479	277026	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC27.02c	tip1	ask1	noc1	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524481	2543201	2540498	279630	277026	SPAC3F10.15c	SPBC27.02c	spo12	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524482	2543643	2540498	280057	277026	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC27.02c	hos2	ask1	hda1|phd1	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524483	2543399	2540498	279821	277026	SPAC3G9.12	SPBC27.02c	peg1	ask1	cls1	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.0223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524484	2543443	2540498	279863	277026	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC27.02c	snt2	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.4777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524485	2543378	2540498	279800	277026	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC27.02c	pac10	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524486	2543529	2540498	279947	277026	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC27.02c	ryh1	ask1	hos1|sat7	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.2457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524487	2543667	2540498	280081	277026	SPAC4H3.02c	SPBC27.02c	swc3	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.9495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524488	2543577	2540498	279992	277026	SPAC4H3.05	SPBC27.02c	srs2	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524489	2543426	2540498	279846	277026	SPAC631.02	SPBC27.02c	bdf2	ask1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-22.7464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524490	2543384	2540498	279806	277026	SPAC637.06	SPBC27.02c	gmh5	ask1	SPAC637.06	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524491	2543580	2540498	279995	277026	SPAC644.14c	SPBC27.02c	rad51	ask1	rhp51	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524492	2543563	2540498	279979	277026	SPAC664.02c	SPBC27.02c	arp8	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.2066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524493	2543240	2540498	279668	277026	SPAC694.06c	SPBC27.02c	mrc1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.6719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524494	2543319	2540498	279743	277026	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC27.02c	trm10	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524495	2542198	2540498	278673	277026	SPAC6F12.09	SPBC27.02c	rdp1	ask1	rdr1	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524496	2543117	2540498	279549	277026	SPAC806.08c	SPBC27.02c	mod21	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524497	2543567	2540498	279983	277026	SPAC890.03	SPBC27.02c	ppk16	ask1	mug92	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524498	2543341	2540498	279764	277026	SPAC8E11.07c	SPBC27.02c	alp31	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524499	2543668	2540498	280082	277026	SPAC9.05	SPBC27.02c	fml1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524500	2542021	2540498	278504	277026	SPAP14E8.02	SPBC27.02c	tos4	ask1	SPAP14E8.02	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524501	2543387	2540498	279809	277026	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC27.02c	mcl1	ask1	slr3	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524502	2543670	2540498	280084	277026	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC27.02c	eme1	ask1	mms4|slx2	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.9024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524503	2540060	2540498	276598	277026	SPBC106.01	SPBC27.02c	mph1	ask1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524504	2539971	2540498	276515	277026	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC27.02c	cbp1	ask1	abp1	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524505	2539930	2540498	276474	277026	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC27.02c	reb1	ask1	SPBC660.01c	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524506	2539726	2540498	276278	277026	SPBC13E7.08c	SPBC27.02c	leo1	ask1	SPBC13E7.08c	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524507	2540100	2540498	276638	277026	SPBC13E7.09	SPBC27.02c	vrp1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524508	2539667	2540498	276222	277026	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC27.02c	ash2	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-18.3485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524509	2539673	2540498	276228	277026	SPBC13G1.10c	SPBC27.02c	mug81	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524510	2539857	2540498	276404	277026	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC27.02c	tea2	ask1	klp4	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524511	2540019	2540498	276563	277026	SPBC1685.01	SPBC27.02c	pmp1	ask1	dsp1	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524512	2539700	2540498	276253	277026	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC27.02c	klp6	ask1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.2285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524513	2540154	2540498	276690	277026	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC27.02c	SPBC16C6.05	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524514	2540822	2540498	277340	277026	SPBC18E5.05c	SPBC27.02c	elp5	ask1	iki1	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524515	2540787	2540498	277306	277026	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC27.02c	sgf29	ask1	SPBC21D10.13	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524516	2540589	2540498	277115	277026	SPBC20F10.06	SPBC27.02c	mad2	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524517	2540664	2540498	277189	277026	SPBC215.02	SPBC27.02c	bob1	ask1	gim5	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524518	2540352	2540498	276881	277026	SPBC215.03c	SPBC27.02c	csn1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524519	2540531	2540498	277059	277026	SPBC23E6.08	SPBC27.02c	sat1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524520	2542519	2540497	278977	277025	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC27.04	scs7	uds1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524521	2540822	2540497	277340	277025	SPBC18E5.05c	SPBC27.04	elp5	uds1	iki1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524522	2542985	2540436	279423	276964	SPAC105.03c	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC105.03c	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524523	2541628	2540436	278124	276964	SPAC110.02	SPBC28F2.10c	pds5	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524524	2543008	2540436	279446	276964	SPAC12B10.13	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC12B10.13	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.6825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524525	2542135	2540436	278611	276964	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC28F2.10c	ubp8	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524526	2542300	2540436	278767	276964	SPAC1687.22c	SPBC28F2.10c	puf3	ngg1	SPAC222.02c	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524527	2542311	2540436	278777	276964	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC28F2.10c	dad1	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524528	2542349	2540436	278814	276964	SPAC1782.05	SPBC28F2.10c	ypa2	ngg1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524529	2542168	2540436	278643	276964	SPAC17A5.16	SPBC28F2.10c	ftp105	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.3463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524530	2542278	2540436	278747	276964	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC28F2.10c	yaf9	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524531	2542170	2540436	278645	276964	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC28F2.10c	mst2	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524532	2542123	2540436	278599	276964	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC28F2.10c	mal3	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524533	2542126	2540436	278602	276964	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC28F2.10c	not3	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.5438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524534	2542023	2540436	278506	276964	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC28F2.10c	ufd2	ngg1	SPAC145.04	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524535	2541871	2540436	278361	276964	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC28F2.10c	res2	ngg1	mcs1|pct1	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524536	2541496	2540436	277998	276964	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC28F2.10c	arp42	ngg1	arp4	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.4114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524537	2541531	2540436	278031	276964	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC28F2.10c	fft3	ngg1	snf2SR	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524538	2542701	2540436	279154	276964	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC28F2.10c	mga2	ngg1	SPAC26H5.05	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524539	2541801	2540436	278292	276964	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC28F2.10c	snf5	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524540	2543160	2540436	279591	276964	SPAC31A2.14	SPBC28F2.10c	bun107	ngg1	wdr48	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524541	2543190	2540436	279619	276964	SPAC31F12.01	SPBC28F2.10c	zds1	ngg1	SPAC637.14|mug88	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524542	2543101	2540436	279533	276964	SPAC323.03c	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC323.03c	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524543	2542592	2540436	279047	276964	SPAC328.01c	SPBC28F2.10c	msn5	ngg1	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524544	2543044	2540436	279479	276964	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC28F2.10c	tip1	ngg1	noc1	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524545	2543064	2540436	279497	276964	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC28F2.10c	hrp3	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.4428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524546	2543616	2540436	280030	276964	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC28F2.10c	cwf21	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524547	2543619	2540436	280033	276964	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC28F2.10c	ypa1	ngg1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524548	2543516	2540436	279934	276964	SPAC4F10.11	SPBC28F2.10c	spn1	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524549	2543432	2540436	279852	276964	SPAC4G8.05	SPBC28F2.10c	ppk14	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524550	2543426	2540436	279846	276964	SPAC631.02	SPBC28F2.10c	bdf2	ngg1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.3237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524551	2543580	2540436	279995	276964	SPAC644.14c	SPBC28F2.10c	rad51	ngg1	rhp51	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.0714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524552	2543567	2540436	279983	276964	SPAC890.03	SPBC28F2.10c	ppk16	ngg1	mug92	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524553	2543289	2540436	279714	276964	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC28F2.10c	rad26	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524554	2542021	2540436	278504	276964	SPAP14E8.02	SPBC28F2.10c	tos4	ngg1	SPAP14E8.02	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.0522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524555	2543387	2540436	279809	276964	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC28F2.10c	mcl1	ngg1	slr3	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524556	2540173	2540436	276706	276964	SPBC106.13	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC106.13	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524557	2539971	2540436	276515	276964	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC28F2.10c	cbp1	ngg1	abp1	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.5563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524558	2539920	2540436	276464	276964	SPBC119.08	SPBC28F2.10c	pmk1	ngg1	spm1	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524559	2539930	2540436	276474	276964	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC28F2.10c	reb1	ngg1	SPBC660.01c	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524560	2539911	2540436	276456	276964	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC28F2.10c	amo1	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524561	2539857	2540436	276404	276964	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC28F2.10c	tea2	ngg1	klp4	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524562	2540019	2540436	276563	276964	SPBC1685.01	SPBC28F2.10c	pmp1	ngg1	dsp1	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524563	2539700	2540436	276253	276964	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC28F2.10c	klp6	ngg1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524564	2539925	2540436	276469	276964	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC16H5.13	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524565	2539876	2540436	276422	276964	SPBC1734.07c	SPBC28F2.10c	trs8502	ngg1	SPBC1734.07c	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524566	2540077	2540436	276615	276964	SPBC17D11.04c	SPBC28F2.10c	nto1	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.1813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524567	2539714	2540436	276267	276964	SPBC1861.07	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC1861.07	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.6731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524568	2540514	2540436	277042	276964	SPBC19F5.02c	SPBC28F2.10c	utp4	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.3344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524569	2540352	2540436	276881	276964	SPBC215.03c	SPBC28F2.10c	csn1	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.6189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524570	2540686	2540436	277211	276964	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC28F2.10c	bdc1	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.8532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524571	2540317	2540436	276847	276964	SPBC24C6.05	SPBC28F2.10c	sec28	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.8135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524572	2542418	2540337	278881	276866	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC28F2.11	dad2	hmo1	hos2	SPBC28F2.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524573	2542192	2540337	278667	276866	SPAC9G1.12	SPBC28F2.11	cpd1	hmo1	-	SPBC28F2.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524574	2543387	2540337	279809	276866	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC28F2.11	mcl1	hmo1	slr3	SPBC28F2.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524575	2540352	2540337	276881	276866	SPBC215.03c	SPBC28F2.11	csn1	hmo1	-	SPBC28F2.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524576	2542925	2540348	279366	276877	SPAC11E3.04c	SPBC29A10.05	ubc13	exo1	spu13|sst5	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524577	2542757	2540348	279207	276877	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC29A10.05	mre11	exo1	rad32	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524578	3361391	2540348	280467	276877	SPAC13G6.01c	SPBC29A10.05	rad8	exo1	SPAC5H10.14c	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524579	2541643	2540348	278139	276877	SPAC14C4.13	SPBC29A10.05	rad17	exo1	-	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524580	2542207	2540348	278682	276877	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC29A10.05	ddb1	exo1	-	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524581	2542558	2540348	279014	276877	SPAC1952.07	SPBC29A10.05	rad1	exo1	rad19	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524582	2541746	2540348	278240	276877	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC29A10.05	hus1	exo1	-	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524583	2542036	2540348	278518	276877	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC29A10.05	hrq1	exo1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524584	2543510	2540348	279928	276877	SPAC30D11.07	SPBC29A10.05	nth1	exo1	-	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524585	2543164	2540348	279595	276877	SPAC3G6.06c	SPBC29A10.05	rad2	exo1	fen1	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-19.0949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524586	2543529	2540348	279947	276877	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC29A10.05	ryh1	exo1	hos1|sat7	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524587	2543580	2540348	279995	276877	SPAC644.14c	SPBC29A10.05	rad51	exo1	rhp51	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524588	2543544	2540348	279961	276877	SPAC664.07c	SPBC29A10.05	rad9	exo1	-	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524589	2543358	2540348	279780	276877	SPAC688.10	SPBC29A10.05	rev3	exo1	-	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524590	2543289	2540348	279714	276877	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC29A10.05	rad26	exo1	-	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524591	2543670	2540348	280084	276877	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC29A10.05	eme1	exo1	mms4|slx2	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524592	2543263	2540523	279691	277051	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC29A10.10c	med6	dbl8	pmc5	SPBC29A10.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524593	2543670	2540523	280084	277051	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC29A10.10c	eme1	dbl8	mms4|slx2	SPBC29A10.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524594	2540352	2540523	276881	277051	SPBC215.03c	SPBC29A10.10c	csn1	dbl8	-	SPBC29A10.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524595	2541536	2540512	278036	277040	SPAC1071.02	SPBC29A3.05	mms19	vps71	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524596	2542764	2540512	279214	277040	SPAC15E1.10	SPBC29A3.05	SPAC15E1.10	vps71	SPAP7G5.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524597	2542318	2540512	278784	277040	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC29A3.05	cph1	vps71	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524598	2542349	2540512	278814	277040	SPAC1782.05	SPBC29A3.05	ypa2	vps71	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524599	2542363	2540512	278827	277040	SPAC1783.05	SPBC29A3.05	hrp1	vps71	chd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524600	2542277	2540512	278746	277040	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC29A3.05	dbr1	vps71	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.8434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524601	2542418	2540512	278881	277040	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC29A3.05	dad2	vps71	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524602	2542237	2540512	278709	277040	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC29A3.05	fin1	vps71	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524603	2542126	2540512	278602	277040	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC29A3.05	not3	vps71	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524604	2541899	2540512	278389	277040	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC29A3.05	set3	vps71	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524605	2541786	2540512	278278	277040	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC29A3.05	rok1	vps71	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524606	2541496	2540512	277998	277040	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC29A3.05	arp42	vps71	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.9151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524607	2541531	2540512	278031	277040	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC29A3.05	fft3	vps71	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.8005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524608	2542701	2540512	279154	277040	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC29A3.05	mga2	vps71	SPAC26H5.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524609	2541889	2540512	278379	277040	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC29A3.05	pom1	vps71	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524610	2543190	2540512	279619	277040	SPAC31F12.01	SPBC29A3.05	zds1	vps71	SPAC637.14|mug88	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524611	2543452	2540512	279872	277040	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC29A3.05	ssu72	vps71	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.0	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524612	2543643	2540512	280057	277040	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC29A3.05	hos2	vps71	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.0979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524613	2543443	2540512	279863	277040	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC29A3.05	snt2	vps71	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-20.1775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524614	2543616	2540512	280030	277040	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC29A3.05	cwf21	vps71	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524615	2543529	2540512	279947	277040	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC29A3.05	ryh1	vps71	hos1|sat7	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524616	2543426	2540512	279846	277040	SPAC631.02	SPBC29A3.05	bdf2	vps71	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.5389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524617	2543563	2540512	279979	277040	SPAC664.02c	SPBC29A3.05	arp8	vps71	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.1872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524618	2542845	2540512	279291	277040	SPAC824.04	SPBC29A3.05	SPAC824.04	vps71	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.1909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524619	2543567	2540512	279983	277040	SPAC890.03	SPBC29A3.05	ppk16	vps71	mug92	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524620	2542102	2540512	278578	277040	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC29A3.05	spc34	vps71	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524621	2543387	2540512	279809	277040	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC29A3.05	mcl1	vps71	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524622	2543670	2540512	280084	277040	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC29A3.05	eme1	vps71	mms4|slx2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524623	2540060	2540512	276598	277040	SPBC106.01	SPBC29A3.05	mph1	vps71	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524624	2539667	2540512	276222	277040	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC29A3.05	ash2	vps71	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-22.3316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524625	2539773	2540512	276324	277040	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC29A3.05	med7	vps71	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.3539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524626	2539999	2540512	276543	277040	SPBC1734.15	SPBC29A3.05	rsc4	vps71	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524627	2540115	2540512	276652	277040	SPBC1778.02	SPBC29A3.05	rap1	vps71	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524628	2539714	2540512	276267	277040	SPBC1861.07	SPBC29A3.05	SPBC1861.07	vps71	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524629	2542421	2540513	278884	277041	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC29A3.08	med20	pof4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.4757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524630	2542418	2540513	278881	277041	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC29A3.08	dad2	pof4	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524631	2543580	2540513	279995	277041	SPAC644.14c	SPBC29A3.08	rad51	pof4	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524632	2542198	2540513	278673	277041	SPAC6F12.09	SPBC29A3.08	rdp1	pof4	rdr1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524633	2543670	2540513	280084	277041	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC29A3.08	eme1	pof4	mms4|slx2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524634	2540032	2540513	276575	277041	SPBC1703.14c	SPBC29A3.08	top1	pof4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524635	2540664	2540513	277189	277041	SPBC215.02	SPBC29A3.08	bob1	pof4	gim5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524636	2540531	2540513	277059	277041	SPBC23E6.08	SPBC29A3.08	sat1	pof4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524637	2542757	2540597	279207	277123	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC29A3.09c	mre11	SPBC29A3.09c	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524638	2542363	2540597	278827	277123	SPAC1783.05	SPBC29A3.09c	hrp1	SPBC29A3.09c	chd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524639	2542277	2540597	278746	277123	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC29A3.09c	dbr1	SPBC29A3.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524640	2541713	2540597	278208	277123	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC29A3.09c	atp11	SPBC29A3.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524641	2543384	2540597	279806	277123	SPAC637.06	SPBC29A3.09c	gmh5	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC637.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524642	2543580	2540597	279995	277123	SPAC644.14c	SPBC29A3.09c	rad51	SPBC29A3.09c	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524643	2543563	2540597	279979	277123	SPAC664.02c	SPBC29A3.09c	arp8	SPBC29A3.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524644	2542198	2540597	278673	277123	SPAC6F12.09	SPBC29A3.09c	rdp1	SPBC29A3.09c	rdr1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524645	2542845	2540597	279291	277123	SPAC824.04	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC824.04	SPBC29A3.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524646	2543372	2540597	279794	277123	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC29A3.09c	ase1	SPBC29A3.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524647	2543670	2540597	280084	277123	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC29A3.09c	eme1	SPBC29A3.09c	mms4|slx2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524648	2539971	2540597	276515	277123	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC29A3.09c	cbp1	SPBC29A3.09c	abp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.6945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524649	2539930	2540597	276474	277123	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC29A3.09c	reb1	SPBC29A3.09c	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524650	2539673	2540597	276228	277123	SPBC13G1.10c	SPBC29A3.09c	mug81	SPBC29A3.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524651	2539911	2540597	276456	277123	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC29A3.09c	amo1	SPBC29A3.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524652	2543263	2540354	279691	276883	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC29A3.13	med6	pdp1	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524653	2541536	2540354	278036	276883	SPAC1071.02	SPBC29A3.13	mms19	pdp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524654	2542757	2540354	279207	276883	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC29A3.13	mre11	pdp1	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524655	2542421	2540354	278884	276883	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC29A3.13	med20	pdp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524656	2542207	2540354	278682	276883	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC29A3.13	ddb1	pdp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524657	2542418	2540354	278881	276883	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC29A3.13	dad2	pdp1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524658	2542541	2540354	278998	276883	SPAC1B3.03c	SPBC29A3.13	wis2	pdp1	cyp5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524659	2542007	2540354	278490	276883	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC29A3.13	rad57	pdp1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524660	2541899	2540354	278389	276883	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC29A3.13	set3	pdp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524661	2541871	2540354	278361	276883	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC29A3.13	res2	pdp1	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524662	2541578	2540354	278075	276883	SPAC25B8.05	SPBC29A3.13	deg1	pdp1	SPAC25B8.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524663	2542667	2540354	279120	276883	SPAC26A3.16	SPBC29A3.13	dph1	pdp1	ucp5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524664	2542701	2540354	279154	276883	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC29A3.13	mga2	pdp1	SPAC26H5.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524665	2541889	2540354	278379	276883	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC29A3.13	pom1	pdp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524666	2543160	2540354	279591	276883	SPAC31A2.14	SPBC29A3.13	bun107	pdp1	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524667	2543643	2540354	280057	276883	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC29A3.13	hos2	pdp1	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524668	2543529	2540354	279947	276883	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC29A3.13	ryh1	pdp1	hos1|sat7	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524669	2543580	2540354	279995	276883	SPAC644.14c	SPBC29A3.13	rad51	pdp1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524670	2543240	2540354	279668	276883	SPAC694.06c	SPBC29A3.13	mrc1	pdp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524671	2543668	2540354	280082	276883	SPAC9.05	SPBC29A3.13	fml1	pdp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524672	2539667	2540354	276222	276883	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC29A3.13	ash2	pdp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524673	2540352	2540354	276881	276883	SPBC215.03c	SPBC29A3.13	csn1	pdp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524674	2543240	2540276	279668	276807	SPAC694.06c	SPBC2A9.03	mrc1	SPBC2A9.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524675	2539804	2540276	276354	276807	SPBC1105.11c	SPBC2A9.03	hht3	SPBC2A9.03	h3.3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524676	2540064	2540276	276602	276807	SPBC1718.02	SPBC2A9.03	hop1	SPBC2A9.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524677	2540787	2540276	277306	276807	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC2A9.03	sgf29	SPBC2A9.03	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524678	2541578	2540480	278075	277008	SPAC25B8.05	SPBC2A9.04c	deg1	san1	SPAC25B8.05	SPBC2A9.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524679	2543240	2540480	279668	277008	SPAC694.06c	SPBC2A9.04c	mrc1	san1	-	SPBC2A9.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524680	2540064	2540480	276602	277008	SPBC1718.02	SPBC2A9.04c	hop1	san1	-	SPBC2A9.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524681	2540106	2540492	276643	277020	SPBC12D12.09	SPBC2D10.13	rev7	est1	SPAC12D12.09	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524682	2542318	2540492	278784	277020	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC2D10.13	cph1	est1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524683	2542418	2540492	278881	277020	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC2D10.13	dad2	est1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524684	2541496	2540492	277998	277020	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC2D10.13	arp42	est1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.5737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524685	2541801	2540492	278292	277020	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC2D10.13	snf5	est1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524686	2541710	2540492	278205	277020	SPAC343.11c	SPBC2D10.13	msc1	est1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524687	2543619	2540492	280033	277020	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC2D10.13	ypa1	est1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524688	2543544	2540492	279961	277020	SPAC664.07c	SPBC2D10.13	rad9	est1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524689	2539604	2540492	276162	277020	SPBC1105.14	SPBC2D10.13	rsv2	est1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524690	2539668	2540492	276223	277020	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC2D10.13	pht1	est1	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524691	2539679	2540492	276234	277020	SPBC12C2.05c	SPBC2D10.13	bzz1	est1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524692	2539925	2540492	276469	277020	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC2D10.13	SPBC16H5.13	est1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524693	2539999	2540492	276543	277020	SPBC1734.15	SPBC2D10.13	rsc4	est1	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524694	2540822	2540492	277340	277020	SPBC18E5.05c	SPBC2D10.13	elp5	est1	iki1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524695	2540787	2540492	277306	277020	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC2D10.13	sgf29	est1	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524696	2540678	2540492	277203	277020	SPBC1A4.10c	SPBC2D10.13	pmc1	est1	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524697	2540612	2540492	277138	277020	SPBC1D7.05	SPBC2D10.13	byr2	est1	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524698	2540498	2540492	277026	277020	SPBC27.02c	SPBC2D10.13	ask1	est1	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524699	2540436	2540492	276964	277020	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC2D10.13	ngg1	est1	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524700	2540597	2540492	277123	277020	SPBC29A3.09c	SPBC2D10.13	SPBC29A3.09c	est1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524701	2542168	2540560	278643	277087	SPAC17A5.16	SPBC2D10.14c	ftp105	myo51	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524702	2542032	2540560	278514	277087	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC2D10.14c	pnk1	myo51	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524703	2541889	2540560	278379	277087	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC2D10.14c	pom1	myo51	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524704	2543240	2540560	279668	277087	SPAC694.06c	SPBC2D10.14c	mrc1	myo51	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524705	2543263	2540346	279691	276875	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC2F12.03c	med6	ebs1	pmc5	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524706	2541628	2540346	278124	276875	SPAC110.02	SPBC2F12.03c	pds5	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524707	2542207	2540346	278682	276875	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC2F12.03c	ddb1	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524708	2542519	2540346	278977	276875	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC2F12.03c	scs7	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524709	2541871	2540346	278361	276875	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC2F12.03c	res2	ebs1	mcs1|pct1	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524710	2542036	2540346	278518	276875	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC2F12.03c	hrq1	ebs1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524711	2541496	2540346	277998	276875	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC2F12.03c	arp42	ebs1	arp4	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.8803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524712	2541776	2540346	278270	276875	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC2F12.03c	swd1	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524713	2543190	2540346	279619	276875	SPAC31F12.01	SPBC2F12.03c	zds1	ebs1	SPAC637.14|mug88	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524714	2543064	2540346	279497	276875	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC2F12.03c	hrp3	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524715	2543372	2540346	279794	276875	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC2F12.03c	ase1	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524716	2543670	2540346	280084	276875	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC2F12.03c	eme1	ebs1	mms4|slx2	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524717	2539930	2540346	276474	276875	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC2F12.03c	reb1	ebs1	SPBC660.01c	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524718	2539911	2540346	276456	276875	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC2F12.03c	amo1	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524719	2540115	2540346	276652	276875	SPBC1778.02	SPBC2F12.03c	rap1	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524720	2539714	2540346	276267	276875	SPBC1861.07	SPBC2F12.03c	SPBC1861.07	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524721	2540352	2540346	276881	276875	SPBC215.03c	SPBC2F12.03c	csn1	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524722	2540492	2540346	277020	276875	SPBC2D10.13	SPBC2F12.03c	est1	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524723	3361561	2540353	280637	276882	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC2F12.12c	swr1	cay1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524724	2541575	2540353	278072	276882	SPAC12B10.01c	SPBC2F12.12c	SPAC12B10.01c	cay1	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524725	2542757	2540353	279207	276882	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC2F12.12c	mre11	cay1	rad32	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524726	2542311	2540353	278777	276882	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC2F12.12c	dad1	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524727	2542318	2540353	278784	276882	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC2F12.12c	cph1	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524728	2542278	2540353	278747	276882	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC2F12.12c	yaf9	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.2612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524729	2542170	2540353	278645	276882	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC2F12.12c	mst2	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.6877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524730	2542418	2540353	278881	276882	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC2F12.12c	dad2	cay1	hos2	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.9125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524731	2542463	2540353	278924	276882	SPAC1834.03c	SPBC2F12.12c	hhf1	cay1	h4.1	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524732	2542467	2540353	278928	276882	SPAC1834.04	SPBC2F12.12c	hht1	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524733	2542239	2540353	278711	276882	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC2F12.12c	chp1	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.6111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524734	2542123	2540353	278599	276882	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC2F12.12c	mal3	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524735	2542555	2540353	279012	276882	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC2F12.12c	SPAC1952.06c	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524736	2542582	2540353	279037	276882	SPAC19G12.02c	SPBC2F12.12c	pms1	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524737	2542550	2540353	279007	276882	SPAC1B3.02c	SPBC2F12.12c	SPAC1B3.02c	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524738	2542459	2540353	278920	276882	SPAC1D4.03c	SPBC2F12.12c	aut12	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.0496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524739	2542007	2540353	278490	276882	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC2F12.12c	rad57	cay1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524740	2542023	2540353	278506	276882	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC2F12.12c	ufd2	cay1	SPAC145.04	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524741	2541899	2540353	278389	276882	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC2F12.12c	set3	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524742	2541496	2540353	277998	276882	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC2F12.12c	arp42	cay1	arp4	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.4257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524743	2541776	2540353	278270	276882	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC2F12.12c	swd1	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.8159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524744	2541856	2540353	278347	276882	SPAC23H3.08c	SPBC2F12.12c	bub3	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524745	2541531	2540353	278031	276882	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC2F12.12c	fft3	cay1	snf2SR	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524746	2542736	2540353	279186	276882	SPAC25G10.02	SPBC2F12.12c	cce1	cay1	ydc2	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524747	2541801	2540353	278292	276882	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC2F12.12c	snf5	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.07	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524748	2543078	2540353	279511	276882	SPAC31A2.15c	SPBC2F12.12c	dcc1	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524749	2541710	2540353	278205	276882	SPAC343.11c	SPBC2F12.12c	msc1	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.8736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524750	2543044	2540353	279479	276882	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC2F12.12c	tip1	cay1	noc1	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524751	2543064	2540353	279497	276882	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC2F12.12c	hrp3	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524752	2543164	2540353	279595	276882	SPAC3G6.06c	SPBC2F12.12c	rad2	cay1	fen1	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524753	2543452	2540353	279872	276882	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC2F12.12c	ssu72	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524754	2543643	2540353	280057	276882	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC2F12.12c	hos2	cay1	hda1|phd1	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524755	2543443	2540353	279863	276882	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC2F12.12c	snt2	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524756	2543576	2540353	279991	276882	SPAC4A8.05c	SPBC2F12.12c	myp2	cay1	myo3	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524757	2543616	2540353	280030	276882	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC2F12.12c	cwf21	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.0437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524758	2543516	2540353	279934	276882	SPAC4F10.11	SPBC2F12.12c	spn1	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524759	2543563	2540353	279979	276882	SPAC664.02c	SPBC2F12.12c	arp8	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524760	2543226	2540353	279654	276882	SPAC6B12.05c	SPBC2F12.12c	ies2	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524761	2542102	2540353	278578	276882	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC2F12.12c	spc34	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.5065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524762	2543289	2540353	279714	276882	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC2F12.12c	rad26	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524763	2540060	2540353	276598	276882	SPBC106.01	SPBC2F12.12c	mph1	cay1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524764	2540023	2540353	276567	276882	SPBC11C11.10	SPBC2F12.12c	SPBC11C11.10	cay1	SPBC3B8.13c	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524765	2539613	2540353	276171	276882	SPBC11C11.11c	SPBC2F12.12c	SPBC11C11.11c	cay1	SPBC3B8.12	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524766	2539787	2540353	276337	276882	SPBC15C4.06c	SPBC2F12.12c	SPBC15C4.06c	cay1	SPBC21H7.01c	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524767	2540209	2540353	276742	276882	SPBC1604.10	SPBC2F12.12c	srb7	cay1	med21	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524768	2539857	2540353	276404	276882	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC2F12.12c	tea2	cay1	klp4	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524769	2540019	2540353	276563	276882	SPBC1685.01	SPBC2F12.12c	pmp1	cay1	dsp1	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524770	2539700	2540353	276253	276882	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC2F12.12c	klp6	cay1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.0799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524771	2540154	2540353	276690	276882	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC2F12.12c	SPBC16C6.05	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524772	2539925	2540353	276469	276882	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC2F12.12c	SPBC16H5.13	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524773	2540198	2540353	276731	276882	SPBC1709.04c	SPBC2F12.12c	cyp3	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524774	2539953	2540353	276497	276882	SPBC1709.11c	SPBC2F12.12c	png2	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524775	2540115	2540353	276652	276882	SPBC1778.02	SPBC2F12.12c	rap1	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524776	2539900	2540353	276446	276882	SPBC17D11.02c	SPBC2F12.12c	hrd1	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524777	2540077	2540353	276615	276882	SPBC17D11.04c	SPBC2F12.12c	nto1	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.0386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524778	2539714	2540353	276267	276882	SPBC1861.07	SPBC2F12.12c	SPBC1861.07	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524779	2540787	2540353	277306	276882	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC2F12.12c	sgf29	cay1	SPBC21D10.13	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524780	2540589	2540353	277115	276882	SPBC20F10.06	SPBC2F12.12c	mad2	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524781	2540686	2540353	277211	276882	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC2F12.12c	bdc1	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524782	2540276	2540353	276807	276882	SPBC2A9.03	SPBC2F12.12c	SPBC2A9.03	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524783	2543263	2540270	279691	276801	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC2G2.02	med6	syj1	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524784	2542522	2540270	278980	276801	SPAC19A8.03	SPBC2G2.02	ymr1	syj1	SPAC19A8.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.4695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524785	2542831	2540270	279278	276801	SPAC20H4.08	SPBC2G2.02	whi2	syj1	SPAC20H4.08|SPAC145.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.4162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524786	2543101	2540270	279533	276801	SPAC323.03c	SPBC2G2.02	SPAC323.03c	syj1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524787	2543240	2540270	279668	276801	SPAC694.06c	SPBC2G2.02	mrc1	syj1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524788	2539949	2540270	276493	276801	SPBC1703.04	SPBC2G2.02	mlh1	syj1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524789	2539959	2540270	276503	276801	SPBC1703.11	SPBC2G2.02	SPBC1703.11	syj1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524790	2540353	2540270	276882	276801	SPBC2F12.12c	SPBC2G2.02	cay1	syj1	SPBC2F12.12c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524791	2543240	2540373	279668	276902	SPAC694.06c	SPBC2G2.05	mrc1	rpl1603	-	rpl16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524792	2539959	2540373	276503	276902	SPBC1703.11	SPBC2G2.05	SPBC1703.11	rpl1603	-	rpl16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524793	2540680	2540373	277205	276902	SPBC26H8.05c	SPBC2G2.05	pph3	rpl1603	SPBC26H8.05c	rpl16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524794	2541818	2540306	278309	276836	SPAC11G7.02	SPBC2G5.02c	pub1	ckb2	-	SPBC2G5.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524795	2542363	2540306	278827	276836	SPAC1783.05	SPBC2G5.02c	hrp1	ckb2	chd1	SPBC2G5.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524796	2540019	2540306	276563	276836	SPBC1685.01	SPBC2G5.02c	pmp1	ckb2	dsp1	SPBC2G5.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524797	2540531	2540306	277059	276836	SPBC23E6.08	SPBC2G5.02c	sat1	ckb2	-	SPBC2G5.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524798	2542277	2540416	278746	276944	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC30B4.02c	dbr1	SPBC30B4.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524799	2542519	2540416	278977	276944	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC30B4.02c	scs7	SPBC30B4.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524800	2541536	3361323	278036	280399	SPAC1071.02	SPBC30D10.04	mms19	swi3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524801	2542757	3361323	279207	280399	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC30D10.04	mre11	swi3	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.3452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524802	2541643	3361323	278139	280399	SPAC14C4.13	SPBC30D10.04	rad17	swi3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.7614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524803	2542318	3361323	278784	280399	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC30D10.04	cph1	swi3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.2672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524804	2542418	3361323	278881	280399	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC30D10.04	dad2	swi3	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524805	2541746	3361323	278240	280399	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC30D10.04	hus1	swi3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.3146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524806	2541871	3361323	278361	280399	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC30D10.04	res2	swi3	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524807	2541885	3361323	278375	280399	SPAC22H10.03c	SPBC30D10.04	kap114	swi3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524808	2542036	3361323	278518	280399	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC30D10.04	hrq1	swi3	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.85	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524809	2541496	3361323	277998	280399	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC30D10.04	arp42	swi3	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524810	2543078	3361323	279511	280399	SPAC31A2.15c	SPBC30D10.04	dcc1	swi3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524811	2543064	3361323	279497	280399	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC30D10.04	hrp3	swi3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.8563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524812	2543452	3361323	279872	280399	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC30D10.04	ssu72	swi3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524813	2543577	3361323	279992	280399	SPAC4H3.05	SPBC30D10.04	srs2	swi3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524814	2543563	3361323	279979	280399	SPAC664.02c	SPBC30D10.04	arp8	swi3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524815	2543544	3361323	279961	280399	SPAC664.07c	SPBC30D10.04	rad9	swi3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.0606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524816	2543240	3361323	279668	280399	SPAC694.06c	SPBC30D10.04	mrc1	swi3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524817	2543226	3361323	279654	280399	SPAC6B12.05c	SPBC30D10.04	ies2	swi3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524818	2543319	3361323	279743	280399	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC30D10.04	trm10	swi3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.9025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524819	2543289	3361323	279714	280399	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC30D10.04	rad26	swi3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.8506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524820	2543387	3361323	279809	280399	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC30D10.04	mcl1	swi3	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.7294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524821	2539651	3361323	276206	280399	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC30D10.04	srb11	swi3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524822	2539787	3361323	276337	280399	SPBC15C4.06c	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC15C4.06c	swi3	SPBC21H7.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524823	3361342	3361323	280418	280399	SPBC16D10.07c	SPBC30D10.04	sir2	swi3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524824	2539733	3361323	276285	280399	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC30D10.04	pab2	swi3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524825	2539999	3361323	276543	280399	SPBC1734.15	SPBC30D10.04	rsc4	swi3	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524826	2540822	3361323	277340	280399	SPBC18E5.05c	SPBC30D10.04	elp5	swi3	iki1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524827	2540523	3361323	277051	280399	SPBC29A10.10c	SPBC30D10.04	dbl8	swi3	SPBC29A10.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.2824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524828	2540354	3361323	276883	280399	SPBC29A3.13	SPBC30D10.04	pdp1	swi3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.9664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524829	2540346	3361323	276875	280399	SPBC2F12.03c	SPBC30D10.04	ebs1	swi3	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524830	2540100	2540327	276638	276857	SPBC13E7.09	SPBC31F10.07	vrp1	lsb5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524831	2543263	2540322	279691	276852	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC31F10.10c	med6	SPBC31F10.10c	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.1515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524832	5802929	2540322	858067	276852	SPAC1556.08c	SPBC31F10.10c	cbs2	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC1F12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524833	2541580	2540322	278077	276852	SPAC1687.05	SPBC31F10.10c	pli1	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524834	2542300	2540322	278767	276852	SPAC1687.22c	SPBC31F10.10c	puf3	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC222.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524835	2542318	2540322	278784	276852	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC31F10.10c	cph1	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.1293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524836	2542349	2540322	278814	276852	SPAC1782.05	SPBC31F10.10c	ypa2	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.1504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524837	2542363	2540322	278827	276852	SPAC1783.05	SPBC31F10.10c	hrp1	SPBC31F10.10c	chd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524838	2542277	2540322	278746	276852	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC31F10.10c	dbr1	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.6884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524839	2542150	2540322	278626	276852	SPAC17A5.11	SPBC31F10.10c	rec12	SPBC31F10.10c	spo11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524840	2542278	2540322	278747	276852	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC31F10.10c	yaf9	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.4116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524841	2542418	2540322	278881	276852	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC31F10.10c	dad2	SPBC31F10.10c	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524842	2542239	2540322	278711	276852	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC31F10.10c	chp1	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524843	2542123	2540322	278599	276852	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC31F10.10c	mal3	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524844	2542568	2540322	279024	276852	SPAC1952.02	SPBC31F10.10c	tma23	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524845	2542513	2540322	278971	276852	SPAC1952.05	SPBC31F10.10c	gcn5	SPBC31F10.10c	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524846	2542469	2540322	278930	276852	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC31F10.10c	erg5	SPBC31F10.10c	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524847	2542519	2540322	278977	276852	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC31F10.10c	scs7	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524848	2541871	2540322	278361	276852	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC31F10.10c	res2	SPBC31F10.10c	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.3711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524849	2541979	2540322	278464	276852	SPAC23A1.07	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC23A1.07	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524850	2542032	2540322	278514	276852	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC31F10.10c	pnk1	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524851	2541929	2540322	278417	276852	SPAC23C4.12	SPBC31F10.10c	hhp2	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524852	2541496	2540322	277998	276852	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC31F10.10c	arp42	SPBC31F10.10c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524853	2541776	2540322	278270	276852	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC31F10.10c	swd1	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524854	2541531	2540322	278031	276852	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC31F10.10c	fft3	SPBC31F10.10c	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524855	2541578	2540322	278075	276852	SPAC25B8.05	SPBC31F10.10c	deg1	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC25B8.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524856	2542701	2540322	279154	276852	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC31F10.10c	mga2	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC26H5.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.1317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524857	2541614	2540322	278111	276852	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC31F10.10c	elp3	SPBC31F10.10c	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524858	2541889	2540322	278379	276852	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC31F10.10c	pom1	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524859	2542592	2540322	279047	276852	SPAC328.01c	SPBC31F10.10c	msn5	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524860	2543106	2540322	279538	276852	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524861	2543044	2540322	279479	276852	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC31F10.10c	tip1	SPBC31F10.10c	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524862	2543452	2540322	279872	276852	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC31F10.10c	ssu72	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524863	2543378	2540322	279800	276852	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC31F10.10c	pac10	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524864	2543619	2540322	280033	276852	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC31F10.10c	ypa1	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524865	2543563	2540322	279979	276852	SPAC664.02c	SPBC31F10.10c	arp8	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524866	2543319	2540322	279743	276852	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC31F10.10c	trm10	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524867	2542845	2540322	279291	276852	SPAC824.04	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC824.04	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524868	2543567	2540322	279983	276852	SPAC890.03	SPBC31F10.10c	ppk16	SPBC31F10.10c	mug92	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524869	2542102	2540322	278578	276852	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC31F10.10c	spc34	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524870	2543341	2540322	279764	276852	SPAC8E11.07c	SPBC31F10.10c	alp31	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524871	2542329	2540322	278795	276852	SPAC9G1.10c	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC9G1.10c	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524872	2542192	2540322	278667	276852	SPAC9G1.12	SPBC31F10.10c	cpd1	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524873	2543387	2540322	279809	276852	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC31F10.10c	mcl1	SPBC31F10.10c	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524874	2539930	2540322	276474	276852	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC31F10.10c	reb1	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524875	2539668	2540322	276223	276852	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC31F10.10c	pht1	SPBC31F10.10c	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524876	2539911	2540322	276456	276852	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC31F10.10c	amo1	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524877	2540019	2540322	276563	276852	SPBC1685.01	SPBC31F10.10c	pmp1	SPBC31F10.10c	dsp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524878	2539700	2540322	276253	276852	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC31F10.10c	klp6	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524879	2540154	2540322	276690	276852	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524880	2539733	2540322	276285	276852	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC31F10.10c	pab2	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524881	2539925	2540322	276469	276852	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524882	2540788	2540322	277307	276852	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC31F10.10c	swd2	SPBC31F10.10c	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.4896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524883	2540686	2540322	277211	276852	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC31F10.10c	bdc1	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524884	2540498	2540322	277026	276852	SPBC27.02c	SPBC31F10.10c	ask1	SPBC31F10.10c	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.2117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524885	2540436	2540322	276964	276852	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC31F10.10c	ngg1	SPBC31F10.10c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524886	2540512	2540322	277040	276852	SPBC29A3.05	SPBC31F10.10c	vps71	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524887	2541536	2540396	278036	276924	SPAC1071.02	SPBC31F10.12	mms19	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524888	2542318	2540396	278784	276924	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC31F10.12	cph1	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524889	2542278	2540396	278747	276924	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC31F10.12	yaf9	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524890	2542170	2540396	278645	276924	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC31F10.12	mst2	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524891	2542418	2540396	278881	276924	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC31F10.12	dad2	tma20	hos2	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524892	2542469	2540396	278930	276924	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC31F10.12	erg5	tma20	cyp61	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524893	2542032	2540396	278514	276924	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC31F10.12	pnk1	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524894	2541496	2540396	277998	276924	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC31F10.12	arp42	tma20	arp4	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524895	2541776	2540396	278270	276924	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC31F10.12	swd1	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524896	2541578	2540396	278075	276924	SPAC25B8.05	SPBC31F10.12	deg1	tma20	SPAC25B8.05	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524897	2543190	2540396	279619	276924	SPAC31F12.01	SPBC31F10.12	zds1	tma20	SPAC637.14|mug88	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524898	2543064	2540396	279497	276924	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC31F10.12	hrp3	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524899	2543643	2540396	280057	276924	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC31F10.12	hos2	tma20	hda1|phd1	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524900	2543384	2540396	279806	276924	SPAC637.06	SPBC31F10.12	gmh5	tma20	SPAC637.06	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524901	2543240	2540396	279668	276924	SPAC694.06c	SPBC31F10.12	mrc1	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524902	2540060	2540396	276598	276924	SPBC106.01	SPBC31F10.12	mph1	tma20	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524903	2539911	2540396	276456	276924	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC31F10.12	amo1	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.2859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524904	2540115	2540396	276652	276924	SPBC1778.02	SPBC31F10.12	rap1	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524905	2540788	2540396	277307	276924	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC31F10.12	swd2	tma20	swd2.1	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524906	2540686	2540396	277211	276924	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC31F10.12	bdc1	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524907	2540317	2540396	276847	276924	SPBC24C6.05	SPBC31F10.12	sec28	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.7371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524908	2540498	2540396	277026	276924	SPBC27.02c	SPBC31F10.12	ask1	tma20	mug181	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524909	2540512	2540396	277040	276924	SPBC29A3.05	SPBC31F10.12	vps71	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524910	2540353	2540396	276882	276924	SPBC2F12.12c	SPBC31F10.12	cay1	tma20	SPBC2F12.12c	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.4142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524911	2543263	2540219	279691	276752	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC31F10.13c	med6	hip1	pmc5	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524912	2541536	2540219	278036	276752	SPAC1071.02	SPBC31F10.13c	mms19	hip1	-	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.5131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524913	2541628	2540219	278124	276752	SPAC110.02	SPBC31F10.13c	pds5	hip1	-	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524914	2541580	2540219	278077	276752	SPAC1687.05	SPBC31F10.13c	pli1	hip1	-	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524915	2542318	2540219	278784	276752	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC31F10.13c	cph1	hip1	-	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.7783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524916	2542349	2540219	278814	276752	SPAC1782.05	SPBC31F10.13c	ypa2	hip1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524917	2542363	2540219	278827	276752	SPAC1783.05	SPBC31F10.13c	hrp1	hip1	chd1	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524918	2542277	2540219	278746	276752	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC31F10.13c	dbr1	hip1	-	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524919	2542278	2540219	278747	276752	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC31F10.13c	yaf9	hip1	-	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524920	2542207	2540219	278682	276752	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC31F10.13c	ddb1	hip1	-	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524921	2542418	2540219	278881	276752	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC31F10.13c	dad2	hip1	hos2	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.5962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524922	2542463	2540219	278924	276752	SPAC1834.03c	SPBC31F10.13c	hhf1	hip1	h4.1	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.5392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524923	2542239	2540219	278711	276752	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC31F10.13c	chp1	hip1	-	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524924	2542123	2540219	278599	276752	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC31F10.13c	mal3	hip1	-	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524925	2542466	2540219	278927	276752	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC31F10.13c	nup40	hip1	-	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524926	2542519	2540219	278977	276752	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC31F10.13c	scs7	hip1	-	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524927	2542541	2540219	278998	276752	SPAC1B3.03c	SPBC31F10.13c	wis2	hip1	cyp5	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524928	2542007	2540219	278490	276752	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC31F10.13c	rad57	hip1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524929	2542023	2540219	278506	276752	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC31F10.13c	ufd2	hip1	SPAC145.04	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524930	2541786	2540219	278278	276752	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC31F10.13c	rok1	hip1	-	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524931	2541871	2540219	278361	276752	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC31F10.13c	res2	hip1	mcs1|pct1	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.2955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524932	2541496	2540219	277998	276752	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC31F10.13c	arp42	hip1	arp4	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524933	2541438	2540219	277943	276752	SPAC23G3.10c	SPBC31F10.13c	ssr3	hip1	-	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524934	2541776	2540219	278270	276752	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC31F10.13c	swd1	hip1	-	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.6728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524935	2541531	2540219	278031	276752	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC31F10.13c	fft3	hip1	snf2SR	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.6706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524936	2541656	2540219	278152	276752	SPAC25H1.06	SPBC31F10.13c	pcf3	hip1	-	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.5698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524937	2542071	2540219	278548	276752	SPAC26H5.03	SPBC31F10.13c	pcf2	hip1	cac2	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.1887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524938	2541614	2540219	278111	276752	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC31F10.13c	elp3	hip1	kat9	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524939	2541672	2540219	278168	276752	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC31F10.13c	lsk1	hip1	-	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524940	2542592	2540219	279047	276752	SPAC328.01c	SPBC31F10.13c	msn5	hip1	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524941	2543044	2540219	279479	276752	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC31F10.13c	tip1	hip1	noc1	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524942	2543064	2540219	279497	276752	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC31F10.13c	hrp3	hip1	-	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.5839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524943	2543643	2540219	280057	276752	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC31F10.13c	hos2	hip1	hda1|phd1	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.3996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524944	2542571	2540219	279027	276752	SPAC589.02c	SPBC31F10.13c	med13	hip1	spTrap240|srb9	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.2398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524945	2543563	2540219	279979	276752	SPAC664.02c	SPBC31F10.13c	arp8	hip1	-	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.7845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524946	2543240	2540219	279668	276752	SPAC694.06c	SPBC31F10.13c	mrc1	hip1	-	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524947	2543226	2540219	279654	276752	SPAC6B12.05c	SPBC31F10.13c	ies2	hip1	-	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524948	2542198	2540219	278673	276752	SPAC6F12.09	SPBC31F10.13c	rdp1	hip1	rdr1	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524949	2543341	2540219	279764	276752	SPAC8E11.07c	SPBC31F10.13c	alp31	hip1	-	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524950	2543463	2540219	279883	276752	SPAPB21F2.03	SPBC31F10.13c	slx9	hip1	SPAPB21F2.03	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524951	2539930	2540219	276474	276752	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC31F10.13c	reb1	hip1	SPBC660.01c	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524952	2539668	2540219	276223	276752	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC31F10.13c	pht1	hip1	pi001	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524953	2539651	2540219	276206	276752	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC31F10.13c	srb11	hip1	-	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524954	2539911	2540219	276456	276752	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC31F10.13c	amo1	hip1	-	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.2577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524955	2539700	2540219	276253	276752	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC31F10.13c	klp6	hip1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524956	2540154	2540219	276690	276752	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC16C6.05	hip1	-	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524957	2539999	2540219	276543	276752	SPBC1734.15	SPBC31F10.13c	rsc4	hip1	brd1	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524958	2540115	2540219	276652	276752	SPBC1778.02	SPBC31F10.13c	rap1	hip1	-	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524959	2540044	2540219	276582	276752	SPBC1778.04	SPBC31F10.13c	spo6	hip1	-	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524960	2540822	2540219	277340	276752	SPBC18E5.05c	SPBC31F10.13c	elp5	hip1	iki1	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524961	2540788	2540219	277307	276752	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC31F10.13c	swd2	hip1	swd2.1	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.8725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524962	2540799	2540219	277318	276752	SPBC18H10.15	SPBC31F10.13c	cdk11	hip1	ppk23	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524963	2540686	2540219	277211	276752	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC31F10.13c	bdc1	hip1	-	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524964	2540317	2540219	276847	276752	SPBC24C6.05	SPBC31F10.13c	sec28	hip1	-	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524965	2540498	2540219	277026	276752	SPBC27.02c	SPBC31F10.13c	ask1	hip1	mug181	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524966	2540353	2540219	276882	276752	SPBC2F12.12c	SPBC31F10.13c	cay1	hip1	SPBC2F12.12c	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.8997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524967	3361323	2540219	280399	276752	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC31F10.13c	swi3	hip1	-	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524968	2543263	2540221	279691	276754	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC32F12.02	med6	rec14	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524969	2541536	2540221	278036	276754	SPAC1071.02	SPBC32F12.02	mms19	rec14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524970	2541642	2540221	278138	276754	SPAC10F6.05c	SPBC32F12.02	ubc6	rec14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524971	2542469	2540221	278930	276754	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC32F12.02	erg5	rec14	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524972	2543452	2540221	279872	276754	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC32F12.02	ssu72	rec14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524973	2543529	2540221	279947	276754	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC32F12.02	ryh1	rec14	hos1|sat7	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524974	2539971	2540221	276515	276754	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC32F12.02	cbp1	rec14	abp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.5418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524975	2539953	2540221	276497	276754	SPBC1709.11c	SPBC32F12.02	png2	rec14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524976	2540064	2540221	276602	276754	SPBC1718.02	SPBC32F12.02	hop1	rec14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524977	2540436	2540221	276964	276754	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC32F12.02	ngg1	rec14	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524978	2541628	2540221	278124	276754	SPAC110.02	SPBC32F12.02	pds5	rec14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524979	2539667	2540221	276222	276754	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC32F12.02	ash2	rec14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524980	2539673	2540221	276228	276754	SPBC13G1.10c	SPBC32F12.02	mug81	rec14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.3204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524981	2539787	2540221	276337	276754	SPBC15C4.06c	SPBC32F12.02	SPBC15C4.06c	rec14	SPBC21H7.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524982	2539925	2540221	276469	276754	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC32F12.02	SPBC16H5.13	rec14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524983	2539900	2540221	276446	276754	SPBC17D11.02c	SPBC32F12.02	hrd1	rec14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.7119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524984	2540531	2540221	277059	276754	SPBC23E6.08	SPBC32F12.02	sat1	rec14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524985	2542519	2540239	278977	276771	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC32H8.10	scs7	cdk9	-	SPACTOKYO_453.22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.4482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524986	2542123	2540241	278599	276773	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC32H8.11	mal3	mei4	-	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524987	2541468	2540244	277970	276776	SPAC1F5.09c	SPBC336.01	shk2	fbh1	pak2	fdh|fdh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524988	2541496	2540244	277998	276776	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC336.01	arp42	fbh1	arp4	fdh|fdh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524989	2542094	2540244	278571	276776	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC336.01	rcd1	fbh1	-	fdh|fdh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524990	3361512	2540244	280588	276776	SPAC3C7.01c	SPBC336.01	sac12	fbh1	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	fdh|fdh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524991	2543044	2540244	279479	276776	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC336.01	tip1	fbh1	noc1	fdh|fdh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524992	2543164	2540244	279595	276776	SPAC3G6.06c	SPBC336.01	rad2	fbh1	fen1	fdh|fdh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524993	2543577	2540244	279992	276776	SPAC4H3.05	SPBC336.01	srs2	fbh1	-	fdh|fdh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524994	2540064	2540244	276602	276776	SPBC1718.02	SPBC336.01	hop1	fbh1	-	fdh|fdh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524995	2539999	2540244	276543	276776	SPBC1734.15	SPBC336.01	rsc4	fbh1	brd1	fdh|fdh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524996	2540322	2540244	276852	276776	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC336.01	SPBC31F10.10c	fbh1	-	fdh|fdh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524997	2539971	2540251	276515	276783	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC336.05c	cbp1	SPBC336.05c	abp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524998	2540531	2540251	277059	276783	SPBC23E6.08	SPBC336.05c	sat1	SPBC336.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
524999	2541536	2540220	278036	276753	SPAC1071.02	SPBC337.03	mms19	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525000	3361401	2540220	280477	276753	SPAC1093.03	SPBC337.03	SPAC1093.03	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525001	2542278	2540220	278747	276753	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC337.03	yaf9	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525002	2542467	2540220	278928	276753	SPAC1834.04	SPBC337.03	hht1	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525003	2542032	2540220	278514	276753	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC337.03	pnk1	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525004	2541496	2540220	277998	276753	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC337.03	arp42	rhn1	arp4	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.9248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525005	2541776	2540220	278270	276753	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC337.03	swd1	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525006	2541531	2540220	278031	276753	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC337.03	fft3	rhn1	snf2SR	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.6861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525007	2542094	2540220	278571	276753	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC337.03	rcd1	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525008	2542575	2540220	279031	276753	SPAC31G5.10	SPBC337.03	eta2	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525009	2543064	2540220	279497	276753	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC337.03	hrp3	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525010	2543452	2540220	279872	276753	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC337.03	ssu72	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525011	2543643	2540220	280057	276753	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC337.03	hos2	rhn1	hda1|phd1	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525012	2543399	2540220	279821	276753	SPAC3G9.12	SPBC337.03	peg1	rhn1	cls1	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.9562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525013	2543592	2540220	280007	276753	SPAC4F10.18	SPBC337.03	nup37	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525014	2543426	2540220	279846	276753	SPAC631.02	SPBC337.03	bdf2	rhn1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.11	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525015	2542845	2540220	279291	276753	SPAC824.04	SPBC337.03	SPAC824.04	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-21.1585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525016	2543372	2540220	279794	276753	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC337.03	ase1	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.2784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525017	2539971	2540220	276515	276753	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC337.03	cbp1	rhn1	abp1	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525018	2539930	2540220	276474	276753	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC337.03	reb1	rhn1	SPBC660.01c	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525019	2540008	2540220	276552	276753	SPBC12D12.02c	SPBC337.03	cdm1	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525020	2539911	2540220	276456	276753	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC337.03	amo1	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.5332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525021	2539733	2540220	276285	276753	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC337.03	pab2	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525022	2539925	2540220	276469	276753	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC337.03	SPBC16H5.13	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525023	2540077	2540220	276615	276753	SPBC17D11.04c	SPBC337.03	nto1	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525024	2539714	2540220	276267	276753	SPBC1861.07	SPBC337.03	SPBC1861.07	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.9884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525025	2540822	2540220	277340	276753	SPBC18E5.05c	SPBC337.03	elp5	rhn1	iki1	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525026	2540788	2540220	277307	276753	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC337.03	swd2	rhn1	swd2.1	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525027	2540514	2540220	277042	276753	SPBC19F5.02c	SPBC337.03	utp4	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525028	2540686	2540220	277211	276753	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC337.03	bdc1	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.7574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525029	2540498	2540220	277026	276753	SPBC27.02c	SPBC337.03	ask1	rhn1	mug181	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525030	2540346	2540220	276875	276753	SPBC2F12.03c	SPBC337.03	ebs1	rhn1	SPBC2F12.03c	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525031	2543263	2540995	279691	277511	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC337.16	med6	cho1	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525032	2543008	2540995	279446	277511	SPAC12B10.13	SPBC337.16	SPAC12B10.13	cho1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525033	2542757	2540995	279207	277511	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC337.16	mre11	cho1	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525034	2542363	2540995	278827	277511	SPAC1783.05	SPBC337.16	hrp1	cho1	chd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525035	2542168	2540995	278643	277511	SPAC17A5.16	SPBC337.16	ftp105	cho1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525036	2542421	2540995	278884	277511	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC337.16	med20	cho1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525037	2542398	2540995	278862	277511	SPAC1805.03c	SPBC337.16	trm13	cho1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525038	2542568	2540995	279024	277511	SPAC1952.02	SPBC337.16	tma23	cho1	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525039	2542513	2540995	278971	277511	SPAC1952.05	SPBC337.16	gcn5	cho1	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525040	2542459	2540995	278920	277511	SPAC1D4.03c	SPBC337.16	aut12	cho1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525041	2542066	2540995	278543	277511	SPAC227.05	SPBC337.16	SPAC227.05	cho1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525042	2541786	2540995	278278	277511	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC337.16	rok1	cho1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525043	2541496	2540995	277998	277511	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC337.16	arp42	cho1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.3766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525044	2542516	2540995	278974	277511	SPAC2F7.04	SPBC337.16	pmc2	cho1	med1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525045	2541801	2540995	278292	277511	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC337.16	snf5	cho1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.0358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525046	2543190	2540995	279619	277511	SPAC31F12.01	SPBC337.16	zds1	cho1	SPAC637.14|mug88	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525047	2543452	2540995	279872	277511	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC337.16	ssu72	cho1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525048	2543378	2540995	279800	277511	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC337.16	pac10	cho1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525049	2543616	2540995	280030	277511	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC337.16	cwf21	cho1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525050	2543580	2540995	279995	277511	SPAC644.14c	SPBC337.16	rad51	cho1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525051	2542845	2540995	279291	277511	SPAC824.04	SPBC337.16	SPAC824.04	cho1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525052	2541470	2540995	277972	277511	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC337.16	rpb9	cho1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525053	2539930	2540995	276474	277511	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC337.16	reb1	cho1	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525054	2539667	2540995	276222	277511	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC337.16	ash2	cho1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525055	2539673	2540995	276228	277511	SPBC13G1.10c	SPBC337.16	mug81	cho1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525056	2539911	2540995	276456	277511	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC337.16	amo1	cho1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.5334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525057	2539733	2540995	276285	277511	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC337.16	pab2	cho1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525058	2540822	2540995	277340	277511	SPBC18E5.05c	SPBC337.16	elp5	cho1	iki1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525059	2540317	2540995	276847	277511	SPBC24C6.05	SPBC337.16	sec28	cho1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525060	2540680	2540995	277205	277511	SPBC26H8.05c	SPBC337.16	pph3	cho1	SPBC26H8.05c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.0772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525061	2540436	2540995	276964	277511	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC337.16	ngg1	cho1	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525062	2540322	2540995	276852	277511	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC337.16	SPBC31F10.10c	cho1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525063	2542757	2540992	279207	277508	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC342.05	mre11	crb2	rad32	rhp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525064	2542207	2540992	278682	277508	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC342.05	ddb1	crb2	-	rhp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.7257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525065	2542007	2540992	278490	277508	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC342.05	rad57	crb2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	rhp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.8132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525066	2542036	2540992	278518	277508	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC342.05	hrq1	crb2	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	rhp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-20.9698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525067	2543577	2540992	279992	277508	SPAC4H3.05	SPBC342.05	srs2	crb2	-	rhp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525068	2543580	2540992	279995	277508	SPAC644.14c	SPBC342.05	rad51	crb2	rhp51	rhp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.9285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525069	2543240	2540992	279668	277508	SPAC694.06c	SPBC342.05	mrc1	crb2	-	rhp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525070	2543668	2540992	280082	277508	SPAC9.05	SPBC342.05	fml1	crb2	-	rhp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525071	2543387	2540992	279809	277508	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC342.05	mcl1	crb2	slr3	rhp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525072	2540348	2540992	276877	277508	SPBC29A10.05	SPBC342.05	exo1	crb2	mut2	rhp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525073	3361323	2540992	280399	277508	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC342.05	swi3	crb2	-	rhp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.5504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525074	2543263	2540945	279691	277461	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC342.06c	med6	rtt109	pmc5	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525075	2542757	2540945	279207	277461	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC342.06c	mre11	rtt109	rad32	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525076	2541643	2540945	278139	277461	SPAC14C4.13	SPBC342.06c	rad17	rtt109	-	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525077	2542318	2540945	278784	277461	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC342.06c	cph1	rtt109	-	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525078	2542421	2540945	278884	277461	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC342.06c	med20	rtt109	-	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525079	2542207	2540945	278682	277461	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC342.06c	ddb1	rtt109	-	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525080	2542558	2540945	279014	277461	SPAC1952.07	SPBC342.06c	rad1	rtt109	rad19	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.2073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525081	2541746	2540945	278240	277461	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC342.06c	hus1	rtt109	-	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525082	2542036	2540945	278518	277461	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC342.06c	hrq1	rtt109	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525083	2541531	2540945	278031	277461	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC342.06c	fft3	rtt109	snf2SR	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525084	2543443	2540945	279863	277461	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC342.06c	snt2	rtt109	-	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525085	2543544	2540945	279961	277461	SPAC664.07c	SPBC342.06c	rad9	rtt109	-	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525086	2543289	2540945	279714	277461	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC342.06c	rad26	rtt109	-	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525087	2543387	2540945	279809	277461	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC342.06c	mcl1	rtt109	slr3	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525088	2540995	2540945	277511	277461	SPBC337.16	SPBC342.06c	cho1	rtt109	-	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525089	2541536	2540929	278036	277445	SPAC1071.02	SPBC354.03	mms19	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.0434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525090	2542757	2540929	279207	277445	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC354.03	mre11	swd3	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.8763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525091	2541650	2540929	278146	277445	SPAC14C4.12c	SPBC354.03	laf1	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525092	2542300	2540929	278767	277445	SPAC1687.22c	SPBC354.03	puf3	swd3	SPAC222.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525093	2542278	2540929	278747	277445	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC354.03	yaf9	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.4972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525094	2542170	2540929	278645	277445	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC354.03	mst2	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525095	2542418	2540929	278881	277445	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC354.03	dad2	swd3	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.2388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525096	2542123	2540929	278599	277445	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC354.03	mal3	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525097	2542513	2540929	278971	277445	SPAC1952.05	SPBC354.03	gcn5	swd3	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525098	2542555	2540929	279012	277445	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC354.03	SPAC1952.06c	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525099	2542126	2540929	278602	277445	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC354.03	not3	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.7363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525100	2542007	2540929	278490	277445	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC354.03	rad57	swd3	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525101	2542023	2540929	278506	277445	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC354.03	ufd2	swd3	SPAC145.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525102	2541786	2540929	278278	277445	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC354.03	rok1	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525103	2541871	2540929	278361	277445	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC354.03	res2	swd3	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525104	2541496	2540929	277998	277445	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC354.03	arp42	swd3	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525105	2541531	2540929	278031	277445	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC354.03	fft3	swd3	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.5943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525106	2541614	2540929	278111	277445	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC354.03	elp3	swd3	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525107	2541710	2540929	278205	277445	SPAC343.11c	SPBC354.03	msc1	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525108	2543044	2540929	279479	277445	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC354.03	tip1	swd3	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525109	2543064	2540929	279497	277445	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC354.03	hrp3	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.0423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525110	2543443	2540929	279863	277445	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC354.03	snt2	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525111	2543616	2540929	280030	277445	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC354.03	cwf21	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525112	2543619	2540929	280033	277445	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC354.03	ypa1	swd3	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525113	2543516	2540929	279934	277445	SPAC4F10.11	SPBC354.03	spn1	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525114	2543563	2540929	279979	277445	SPAC664.02c	SPBC354.03	arp8	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.4238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525115	2542102	2540929	278578	277445	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC354.03	spc34	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.63	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525116	2542329	2540929	278795	277445	SPAC9G1.10c	SPBC354.03	SPAC9G1.10c	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525117	2542192	2540929	278667	277445	SPAC9G1.12	SPBC354.03	cpd1	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525118	2543387	2540929	279809	277445	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC354.03	mcl1	swd3	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525119	2539668	2540929	276223	277445	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC354.03	pht1	swd3	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.3481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525120	2539857	2540929	276404	277445	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC354.03	tea2	swd3	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.3574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525121	2540154	2540929	276690	277445	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC354.03	SPBC16C6.05	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525122	2540067	2540929	276605	277445	SPBC16H5.05c	SPBC354.03	cyp7	swd3	cwf27	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525123	2539925	2540929	276469	277445	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC354.03	SPBC16H5.13	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.1997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525124	2539999	2540929	276543	277445	SPBC1734.15	SPBC354.03	rsc4	swd3	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.8912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525125	2540077	2540929	276615	277445	SPBC17D11.04c	SPBC354.03	nto1	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525126	2539714	2540929	276267	277445	SPBC1861.07	SPBC354.03	SPBC1861.07	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.3508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525127	2540822	2540929	277340	277445	SPBC18E5.05c	SPBC354.03	elp5	swd3	iki1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525128	2540787	2540929	277306	277445	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC354.03	sgf29	swd3	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525129	2540498	2540929	277026	277445	SPBC27.02c	SPBC354.03	ask1	swd3	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525130	2540436	2540929	276964	277445	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC354.03	ngg1	swd3	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525131	2540396	2540929	276924	277445	SPBC31F10.12	SPBC354.03	tma20	swd3	SPBC31F10.12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525132	2540219	2540929	276752	277445	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC354.03	hip1	swd3	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.3895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525133	2541536	2540952	278036	277468	SPAC1071.02	SPBC354.09c	mms19	SPBC354.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525134	2542192	2540952	278667	277468	SPAC9G1.12	SPBC354.09c	cpd1	SPBC354.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525135	2540353	2540368	276882	276897	SPBC2F12.12c	SPBC36.05c	cay1	clr6	SPBC2F12.12c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525136	2541580	2541017	278077	277532	SPAC1687.05	SPBC36.07	pli1	elp1	-	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525137	2542318	2541017	278784	277532	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC36.07	cph1	elp1	-	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525138	2542237	2541017	278709	277532	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC36.07	fin1	elp1	-	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525139	2542519	2541017	278977	277532	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC36.07	scs7	elp1	-	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.3254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525140	2541867	2541017	278357	277532	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC36.07	sck2	elp1	-	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525141	2541871	2541017	278361	277532	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC36.07	res2	elp1	mcs1|pct1	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.6199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525142	2541496	2541017	277998	277532	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC36.07	arp42	elp1	arp4	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525143	2541801	2541017	278292	277532	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC36.07	snf5	elp1	-	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525144	2543044	2541017	279479	277532	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC36.07	tip1	elp1	noc1	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525145	2543563	2541017	279979	277532	SPAC664.02c	SPBC36.07	arp8	elp1	-	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525146	2543319	2541017	279743	277532	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC36.07	trm10	elp1	-	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525147	2539930	2541017	276474	277532	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC36.07	reb1	elp1	SPBC660.01c	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525148	2540023	2541017	276567	277532	SPBC11C11.10	SPBC36.07	SPBC11C11.10	elp1	SPBC3B8.13c	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525149	2539787	2541017	276337	277532	SPBC15C4.06c	SPBC36.07	SPBC15C4.06c	elp1	SPBC21H7.01c	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525150	2540686	2541017	277211	277532	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC36.07	bdc1	elp1	-	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525151	2543263	2540967	279691	277483	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC36B7.08c	med6	SPBC36B7.08c	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.6489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525152	2541536	2540967	278036	277483	SPAC1071.02	SPBC36B7.08c	mms19	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525153	3361561	2540967	280637	277483	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC36B7.08c	swr1	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.1933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525154	2542300	2540967	278767	277483	SPAC1687.22c	SPBC36B7.08c	puf3	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC222.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525155	2542311	2540967	278777	277483	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC36B7.08c	dad1	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.0008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525156	2542349	2540967	278814	277483	SPAC1782.05	SPBC36B7.08c	ypa2	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525157	2542421	2540967	278884	277483	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC36B7.08c	med20	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.9709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525158	2542278	2540967	278747	277483	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC36B7.08c	yaf9	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-22.8805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525159	2542418	2540967	278881	277483	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC36B7.08c	dad2	SPBC36B7.08c	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-18.8606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525160	2542463	2540967	278924	277483	SPAC1834.03c	SPBC36B7.08c	hhf1	SPBC36B7.08c	h4.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.1773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525161	2541746	2540967	278240	277483	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC36B7.08c	hus1	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525162	2542023	2540967	278506	277483	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC36B7.08c	ufd2	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC145.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525163	2541899	2540967	278389	277483	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC36B7.08c	set3	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525164	2541885	2540967	278375	277483	SPAC22H10.03c	SPBC36B7.08c	kap114	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525165	2541776	2540967	278270	277483	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC36B7.08c	swd1	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.0713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525166	2541856	2540967	278347	277483	SPAC23H3.08c	SPBC36B7.08c	bub3	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525167	2541531	2540967	278031	277483	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC36B7.08c	fft3	SPBC36B7.08c	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-19.2224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525168	2542701	2540967	279154	277483	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC36B7.08c	mga2	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC26H5.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525169	2541614	2540967	278111	277483	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC36B7.08c	elp3	SPBC36B7.08c	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525170	2541710	2540967	278205	277483	SPAC343.11c	SPBC36B7.08c	msc1	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.7418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525171	2543643	2540967	280057	277483	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC36B7.08c	hos2	SPBC36B7.08c	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525172	2543443	2540967	279863	277483	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC36B7.08c	snt2	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.7742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525173	2543667	2540967	280081	277483	SPAC4H3.02c	SPBC36B7.08c	swc3	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.8436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525174	2543426	2540967	279846	277483	SPAC631.02	SPBC36B7.08c	bdf2	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-20.8531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525175	2543240	2540967	279668	277483	SPAC694.06c	SPBC36B7.08c	mrc1	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525176	2542845	2540967	279291	277483	SPAC824.04	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC824.04	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525177	2542102	2540967	278578	277483	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC36B7.08c	spc34	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-24.7191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525178	2543387	2540967	279809	277483	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC36B7.08c	mcl1	SPBC36B7.08c	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525179	2539668	2540967	276223	277483	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC36B7.08c	pht1	SPBC36B7.08c	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.1298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525180	2539667	2540967	276222	277483	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC36B7.08c	ash2	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.8228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525181	2539700	2540967	276253	277483	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC36B7.08c	klp6	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.0498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525182	2540154	2540967	276690	277483	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525183	2540032	2540967	276575	277483	SPBC1703.14c	SPBC36B7.08c	top1	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525184	2540077	2540967	276615	277483	SPBC17D11.04c	SPBC36B7.08c	nto1	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525185	2540788	2540967	277307	277483	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC36B7.08c	swd2	SPBC36B7.08c	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.0253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525186	2540498	2540967	277026	277483	SPBC27.02c	SPBC36B7.08c	ask1	SPBC36B7.08c	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-21.4766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525187	2540353	2540967	276882	277483	SPBC2F12.12c	SPBC36B7.08c	cay1	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC2F12.12c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525188	2540322	2540967	276852	277483	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525189	2540929	2540967	277445	277483	SPBC354.03	SPBC36B7.08c	swd3	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.2022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525190	2542757	2540320	279207	276850	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC3D6.04c	mre11	mad1	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525191	2542318	2540320	278784	276850	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC3D6.04c	cph1	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525192	2542278	2540320	278747	276850	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC3D6.04c	yaf9	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525193	2542418	2540320	278881	276850	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC3D6.04c	dad2	mad1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525194	2542123	2540320	278599	276850	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC3D6.04c	mal3	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525195	2542237	2540320	278709	276850	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC3D6.04c	fin1	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525196	2542459	2540320	278920	276850	SPAC1D4.03c	SPBC3D6.04c	aut12	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525197	2541496	2540320	277998	276850	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC3D6.04c	arp42	mad1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.0267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525198	2541776	2540320	278270	276850	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC3D6.04c	swd1	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525199	2541614	2540320	278111	276850	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC3D6.04c	elp3	mad1	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525200	2542094	2540320	278571	276850	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC3D6.04c	rcd1	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525201	2543399	2540320	279821	276850	SPAC3G9.12	SPBC3D6.04c	peg1	mad1	cls1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525202	2543619	2540320	280033	276850	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC3D6.04c	ypa1	mad1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525203	2543563	2540320	279979	276850	SPAC664.02c	SPBC3D6.04c	arp8	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525204	2542102	2540320	278578	276850	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC3D6.04c	spc34	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8462	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525205	2539604	2540320	276162	276850	SPBC1105.14	SPBC3D6.04c	rsv2	mad1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525206	2539700	2540320	276253	276850	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC3D6.04c	klp6	mad1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525207	2539733	2540320	276285	276850	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC3D6.04c	pab2	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525208	2539998	2540320	276542	276850	SPBC16G5.03	SPBC3D6.04c	SPBC16G5.03	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525209	2540115	2540320	276652	276850	SPBC1778.02	SPBC3D6.04c	rap1	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525210	2540787	2540320	277306	276850	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC3D6.04c	sgf29	mad1	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525211	2540512	2540320	277040	276850	SPBC29A3.05	SPBC3D6.04c	vps71	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525212	2540597	2540320	277123	276850	SPBC29A3.09c	SPBC3D6.04c	SPBC29A3.09c	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525213	2540967	2540320	277483	276850	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC3D6.04c	SPBC36B7.08c	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525214	2542757	2540679	279207	277204	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC3D6.10	mre11	apn2	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525215	2541746	2540679	278240	277204	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC3D6.10	hus1	apn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525216	2543577	2540679	279992	277204	SPAC4H3.05	SPBC3D6.10	srs2	apn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525217	2542007	2541051	278490	277566	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC3E7.08c	rad57	rad13	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525218	2542036	2541051	278518	277566	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC3E7.08c	hrq1	rad13	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525219	2543510	2541051	279928	277566	SPAC30D11.07	SPBC3E7.08c	nth1	rad13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525220	2543580	2541051	279995	277566	SPAC644.14c	SPBC3E7.08c	rad51	rad13	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525221	2540317	2541004	276847	277519	SPBC24C6.05	SPBC3F6.01c	sec28	SPBC3F6.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.0042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525222	2539726	2540997	276278	277513	SPBC13E7.08c	SPBC3H7.06c	leo1	pof9	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525223	2541536	2540968	278036	277484	SPAC1071.02	SPBC3H7.07c	mms19	ser2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525224	2542809	2540968	279257	277484	SPAC15A10.11	SPBC3H7.07c	ubr11	ser2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.5567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525225	2542363	2540968	278827	277484	SPAC1783.05	SPBC3H7.07c	hrp1	ser2	chd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525226	2542150	2540968	278626	277484	SPAC17A5.11	SPBC3H7.07c	rec12	ser2	spo11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525227	2542278	2540968	278747	277484	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC3H7.07c	yaf9	ser2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525228	2542239	2540968	278711	277484	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC3H7.07c	chp1	ser2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525229	2542462	2540968	278923	277484	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC3H7.07c	SPAC19B12.11c	ser2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.6767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525230	2542007	2540968	278490	277484	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC3H7.07c	rad57	ser2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525231	2541885	2540968	278375	277484	SPAC22H10.03c	SPBC3H7.07c	kap114	ser2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525232	2541496	2540968	277998	277484	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC3H7.07c	arp42	ser2	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525233	2541531	2540968	278031	277484	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC3H7.07c	fft3	ser2	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525234	2541614	2540968	278111	277484	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC3H7.07c	elp3	ser2	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-18.2903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525235	2542516	2540968	278974	277484	SPAC2F7.04	SPBC3H7.07c	pmc2	ser2	med1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525236	2541801	2540968	278292	277484	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC3H7.07c	snf5	ser2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.5334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525237	2543160	2540968	279591	277484	SPAC31A2.14	SPBC3H7.07c	bun107	ser2	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525238	2543101	2540968	279533	277484	SPAC323.03c	SPBC3H7.07c	SPAC323.03c	ser2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525239	2543643	2540968	280057	277484	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC3H7.07c	hos2	ser2	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525240	2543563	2540968	279979	277484	SPAC664.02c	SPBC3H7.07c	arp8	ser2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525241	2543226	2540968	279654	277484	SPAC6B12.05c	SPBC3H7.07c	ies2	ser2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525242	2542192	2540968	278667	277484	SPAC9G1.12	SPBC3H7.07c	cpd1	ser2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525243	2539930	2540968	276474	277484	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC3H7.07c	reb1	ser2	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525244	2540159	2540968	276694	277484	SPBC12C2.08	SPBC3H7.07c	dnm1	ser2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525245	2539812	2540968	276362	277484	SPBC1347.02	SPBC3H7.07c	fkbp39	ser2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525246	2539960	2540968	276504	277484	SPBC15D4.15	SPBC3H7.07c	pho2	ser2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525247	2540686	2540968	277211	277484	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC3H7.07c	bdc1	ser2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525248	2540306	2540968	276836	277484	SPBC2G5.02c	SPBC3H7.07c	ckb2	ser2	SPBC2G5.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525249	2540322	2540968	276852	277484	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC3H7.07c	SPBC31F10.10c	ser2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525250	2540219	2540968	276752	277484	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC3H7.07c	hip1	ser2	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.6015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525251	2541580	2540979	278077	277495	SPAC1687.05	SPBC3H7.10	pli1	elp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525252	2542318	2540979	278784	277495	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC3H7.10	cph1	elp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525253	2542466	2540979	278927	277495	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC3H7.10	nup40	elp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525254	2542237	2540979	278709	277495	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC3H7.10	fin1	elp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525255	2541867	2540979	278357	277495	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC3H7.10	sck2	elp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525256	2541871	2540979	278361	277495	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC3H7.10	res2	elp6	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525257	2541496	2540979	277998	277495	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC3H7.10	arp42	elp6	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525258	2541801	2540979	278292	277495	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC3H7.10	snf5	elp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525259	2543044	2540979	279479	277495	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC3H7.10	tip1	elp6	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525260	2543064	2540979	279497	277495	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC3H7.10	hrp3	elp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525261	2543516	2540979	279934	277495	SPAC4F10.11	SPBC3H7.10	spn1	elp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525262	2543563	2540979	279979	277495	SPAC664.02c	SPBC3H7.10	arp8	elp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525263	2543319	2540979	279743	277495	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC3H7.10	trm10	elp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525264	2543463	2540979	279883	277495	SPAPB21F2.03	SPBC3H7.10	slx9	elp6	SPAPB21F2.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525265	2540023	2540979	276567	277495	SPBC11C11.10	SPBC3H7.10	SPBC11C11.10	elp6	SPBC3B8.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525266	2539857	2540979	276404	277495	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC3H7.10	tea2	elp6	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525267	2539999	2540979	276543	277495	SPBC1734.15	SPBC3H7.10	rsc4	elp6	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.5286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525268	2540653	2540979	277178	277495	SPBC215.07c	SPBC3H7.10	SPBC215.07c	elp6	pdp2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525269	2540686	2540979	277211	277495	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC3H7.10	bdc1	elp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525270	2539667	2540600	276222	277126	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC4.05	ash2	mlo2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525271	3361323	2540600	280399	277126	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC4.05	swi3	mlo2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525272	2541628	2540825	278124	277343	SPAC110.02	SPBC428.08c	pds5	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.6364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525273	2542757	2540825	279207	277343	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC428.08c	mre11	clr4	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-18.7905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525274	2541650	2540825	278146	277343	SPAC14C4.12c	SPBC428.08c	laf1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.5258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525275	2542788	2540825	279237	277343	SPAC15A10.15	SPBC428.08c	sgo2	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.3057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525276	2542311	2540825	278777	277343	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC428.08c	dad1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525277	2542318	2540825	278784	277343	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC428.08c	cph1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525278	2542277	2540825	278746	277343	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC428.08c	dbr1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.9477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525279	2542207	2540825	278682	277343	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC428.08c	ddb1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525280	2542418	2540825	278881	277343	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC428.08c	dad2	clr4	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525281	2542123	2540825	278599	277343	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC428.08c	mal3	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-21.2939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525282	2542568	2540825	279024	277343	SPAC1952.02	SPBC428.08c	tma23	clr4	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.7471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525283	2542237	2540825	278709	277343	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC428.08c	fin1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525284	2542519	2540825	278977	277343	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC428.08c	scs7	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525285	2542007	2540825	278490	277343	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC428.08c	rad57	clr4	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525286	2542023	2540825	278506	277343	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC428.08c	ufd2	clr4	SPAC145.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525287	2541786	2540825	278278	277343	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC428.08c	rok1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525288	2542032	2540825	278514	277343	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC428.08c	pnk1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525289	2541496	2540825	277998	277343	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC428.08c	arp42	clr4	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-19.5447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525290	2541856	2540825	278347	277343	SPAC23H3.08c	SPBC428.08c	bub3	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.5747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525291	2541614	2540825	278111	277343	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC428.08c	elp3	clr4	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.1571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525292	2541672	2540825	278168	277343	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC428.08c	lsk1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.2308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525293	2542592	2540825	279047	277343	SPAC328.01c	SPBC428.08c	msn5	clr4	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525294	2541710	2540825	278205	277343	SPAC343.11c	SPBC428.08c	msc1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525295	2543044	2540825	279479	277343	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC428.08c	tip1	clr4	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525296	2543118	2540825	279550	277343	SPAC3G6.11	SPBC428.08c	chl1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.2359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525297	2543378	2540825	279800	277343	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC428.08c	pac10	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525298	2543529	2540825	279947	277343	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC428.08c	ryh1	clr4	hos1|sat7	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525299	2543619	2540825	280033	277343	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC428.08c	ypa1	clr4	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-18.4638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525300	2543580	2540825	279995	277343	SPAC644.14c	SPBC428.08c	rad51	clr4	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.4225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525301	2543563	2540825	279979	277343	SPAC664.02c	SPBC428.08c	arp8	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525302	2543240	2540825	279668	277343	SPAC694.06c	SPBC428.08c	mrc1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.5572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525303	2543567	2540825	279983	277343	SPAC890.03	SPBC428.08c	ppk16	clr4	mug92	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525304	2543341	2540825	279764	277343	SPAC8E11.07c	SPBC428.08c	alp31	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.8918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525305	2543668	2540825	280082	277343	SPAC9.05	SPBC428.08c	fml1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525306	2542192	2540825	278667	277343	SPAC9G1.12	SPBC428.08c	cpd1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525307	2543372	2540825	279794	277343	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC428.08c	ase1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.5404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525308	2543387	2540825	279809	277343	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC428.08c	mcl1	clr4	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.8797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525309	2543670	2540825	280084	277343	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC428.08c	eme1	clr4	mms4|slx2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525310	2539668	2540825	276223	277343	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC428.08c	pht1	clr4	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525311	2539679	2540825	276234	277343	SPBC12C2.05c	SPBC428.08c	bzz1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525312	2539651	2540825	276206	277343	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC428.08c	srb11	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525313	2539812	2540825	276362	277343	SPBC1347.02	SPBC428.08c	fkbp39	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-19.8308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525314	2539673	2540825	276228	277343	SPBC13G1.10c	SPBC428.08c	mug81	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525315	2539911	2540825	276456	277343	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC428.08c	amo1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525316	2539960	2540825	276504	277343	SPBC15D4.15	SPBC428.08c	pho2	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525317	2539857	2540825	276404	277343	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC428.08c	tea2	clr4	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525318	2539733	2540825	276285	277343	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC428.08c	pab2	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525319	2540589	2540825	277115	277343	SPBC20F10.06	SPBC428.08c	mad2	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.4451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525320	2540686	2540825	277211	277343	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC428.08c	bdc1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525321	2540680	2540825	277205	277343	SPBC26H8.05c	SPBC428.08c	pph3	clr4	SPBC26H8.05c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.3644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525322	2540498	2540825	277026	277343	SPBC27.02c	SPBC428.08c	ask1	clr4	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525323	2540512	2540825	277040	277343	SPBC29A3.05	SPBC428.08c	vps71	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525324	2540353	2540825	276882	277343	SPBC2F12.12c	SPBC428.08c	cay1	clr4	SPBC2F12.12c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525325	3361323	2540825	280399	277343	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC428.08c	swi3	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.6275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525326	2540219	2540825	276752	277343	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC428.08c	hip1	clr4	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525327	2540945	2540825	277461	277343	SPBC342.06c	SPBC428.08c	rtt109	clr4	kat11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525328	2540968	2540825	277484	277343	SPBC3H7.07c	SPBC428.08c	ser2	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.6345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525329	2540979	2540825	277495	277343	SPBC3H7.10	SPBC428.08c	elp6	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-19.0351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525330	2542757	2540860	279207	277377	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC428.17c	mre11	wpl1	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.0823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525331	2542007	2540860	278490	277377	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC428.17c	rad57	wpl1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525332	2539925	2540860	276469	277377	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC428.17c	SPBC16H5.13	wpl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525333	2540244	2540860	276776	277377	SPBC336.01	SPBC428.17c	fbh1	wpl1	fdh|fdh1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.07	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525334	2541642	2540749	278138	277271	SPAC10F6.05c	SPBC4B4.03	ubc6	rsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525335	2542311	2540749	278777	277271	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC4B4.03	dad1	rsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525336	2542318	2540749	278784	277271	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC4B4.03	cph1	rsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525337	3361506	2540749	280582	277271	SPAC17G8.09	SPBC4B4.03	shg1	rsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525338	2542418	2540749	278881	277271	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC4B4.03	dad2	rsc1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525339	2542123	2540749	278599	277271	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC4B4.03	mal3	rsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525340	2542568	2540749	279024	277271	SPAC1952.02	SPBC4B4.03	tma23	rsc1	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525341	2542513	2540749	278971	277271	SPAC1952.05	SPBC4B4.03	gcn5	rsc1	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.4576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525342	2542459	2540749	278920	277271	SPAC1D4.03c	SPBC4B4.03	aut12	rsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.3009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525343	2542066	2540749	278543	277271	SPAC227.05	SPBC4B4.03	SPAC227.05	rsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525344	2541899	2540749	278389	277271	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC4B4.03	set3	rsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525345	2541786	2540749	278278	277271	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC4B4.03	rok1	rsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525346	2541871	2540749	278361	277271	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC4B4.03	res2	rsc1	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525347	2542036	2540749	278518	277271	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC4B4.03	hrq1	rsc1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525348	2541496	2540749	277998	277271	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC4B4.03	arp42	rsc1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.2322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525349	2541776	2540749	278270	277271	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC4B4.03	swd1	rsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.9736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525350	2541531	2540749	278031	277271	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC4B4.03	fft3	rsc1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.3421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525351	2541614	2540749	278111	277271	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC4B4.03	elp3	rsc1	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.0108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525352	2542094	2540749	278571	277271	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC4B4.03	rcd1	rsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525353	2541672	2540749	278168	277271	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC4B4.03	lsk1	rsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.6982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525354	2541801	2540749	278292	277271	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC4B4.03	snf5	rsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.9068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525355	2543078	2540749	279511	277271	SPAC31A2.15c	SPBC4B4.03	dcc1	rsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525356	2541710	2540749	278205	277271	SPAC343.11c	SPBC4B4.03	msc1	rsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525357	2543044	2540749	279479	277271	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC4B4.03	tip1	rsc1	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525358	2543064	2540749	279497	277271	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC4B4.03	hrp3	rsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.3774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525359	2543109	2540749	279541	277271	SPAC3G6.09c	SPBC4B4.03	tps2	rsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.5937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525360	2543452	2540749	279872	277271	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC4B4.03	ssu72	rsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.0054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525361	2543643	2540749	280057	277271	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC4B4.03	hos2	rsc1	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525362	2543443	2540749	279863	277271	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC4B4.03	snt2	rsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.6794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525363	2543619	2540749	280033	277271	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC4B4.03	ypa1	rsc1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.7749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525364	2543667	2540749	280081	277271	SPAC4H3.02c	SPBC4B4.03	swc3	rsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525365	2543319	2540749	279743	277271	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC4B4.03	trm10	rsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.1368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525366	2543387	2540749	279809	277271	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC4B4.03	mcl1	rsc1	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525367	2540060	2540749	276598	277271	SPBC106.01	SPBC4B4.03	mph1	rsc1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525368	2539930	2540749	276474	277271	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC4B4.03	reb1	rsc1	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525369	2540154	2540749	276690	277271	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC4B4.03	SPBC16C6.05	rsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525370	2539925	2540749	276469	277271	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC4B4.03	SPBC16H5.13	rsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.6894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525371	2539953	2540749	276497	277271	SPBC1709.11c	SPBC4B4.03	png2	rsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.9332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525372	2539714	2540749	276267	277271	SPBC1861.07	SPBC4B4.03	SPBC1861.07	rsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525373	2540822	2540749	277340	277271	SPBC18E5.05c	SPBC4B4.03	elp5	rsc1	iki1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.3486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525374	2540788	2540749	277307	277271	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC4B4.03	swd2	rsc1	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.9686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525375	2540787	2540749	277306	277271	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC4B4.03	sgf29	rsc1	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.3391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525376	2540678	2540749	277203	277271	SPBC1A4.10c	SPBC4B4.03	pmc1	rsc1	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525377	2540686	2540749	277211	277271	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC4B4.03	bdc1	rsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.6613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525378	2540680	2540749	277205	277271	SPBC26H8.05c	SPBC4B4.03	pph3	rsc1	SPBC26H8.05c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525379	2540498	2540749	277026	277271	SPBC27.02c	SPBC4B4.03	ask1	rsc1	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525380	2540436	2540749	276964	277271	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC4B4.03	ngg1	rsc1	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.1401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525381	2540348	2540749	276877	277271	SPBC29A10.05	SPBC4B4.03	exo1	rsc1	mut2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525382	2540512	2540749	277040	277271	SPBC29A3.05	SPBC4B4.03	vps71	rsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.0517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525383	2540992	2540749	277508	277271	SPBC342.05	SPBC4B4.03	crb2	rsc1	rhp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525384	5802929	2540999	858067	277515	SPAC1556.08c	SPBC4B4.04	cbs2	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC1F12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525385	2541776	2540999	278270	277515	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC4B4.04	swd1	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.6784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525386	2543160	2540999	279591	277515	SPAC31A2.14	SPBC4B4.04	bun107	SPBC4B4.04	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525387	2543064	2540999	279497	277515	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC4B4.04	hrp3	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525388	2543616	2540999	280030	277515	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC4B4.04	cwf21	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.0456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525389	2543577	2540999	279992	277515	SPAC4H3.05	SPBC4B4.04	srs2	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525390	2543384	2540999	279806	277515	SPAC637.06	SPBC4B4.04	gmh5	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC637.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525391	2543240	2540999	279668	277515	SPAC694.06c	SPBC4B4.04	mrc1	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.3458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525392	2541819	2540999	278310	277515	SPAC6G9.08	SPBC4B4.04	ubp6	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525393	2542845	2540999	279291	277515	SPAC824.04	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC824.04	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525394	2539891	2540999	276437	277515	SPBC1347.08c	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC1347.08c	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525395	2540154	2540999	276690	277515	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525396	2540788	2540999	277307	277515	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC4B4.04	swd2	SPBC4B4.04	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.6843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525397	2540837	2540999	277355	277515	SPBC18H10.08c	SPBC4B4.04	ubp4	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525398	2540352	2540999	276881	277515	SPBC215.03c	SPBC4B4.04	csn1	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525399	2540353	2540999	276882	277515	SPBC2F12.12c	SPBC4B4.04	cay1	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC2F12.12c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.6327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525400	2540929	2540999	277445	277515	SPBC354.03	SPBC4B4.04	swd3	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.3166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525401	2540967	2540999	277483	277515	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525402	2540320	2540999	276850	277515	SPBC3D6.04c	SPBC4B4.04	mad1	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.5257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525403	2543263	2539847	279691	276395	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC530.14c	med6	dsk1	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525404	2542277	2539847	278746	276395	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC530.14c	dbr1	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525405	2542421	2539847	278884	276395	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC530.14c	med20	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525406	2542418	2539847	278881	276395	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC530.14c	dad2	dsk1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525407	2542568	2539847	279024	276395	SPAC1952.02	SPBC530.14c	tma23	dsk1	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525408	2541899	2539847	278389	276395	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC530.14c	set3	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525409	2541786	2539847	278278	276395	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC530.14c	rok1	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-19.6942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525410	2541672	2539847	278168	276395	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC530.14c	lsk1	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525411	2541889	2539847	278379	276395	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC530.14c	pom1	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525412	2543643	2539847	280057	276395	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC530.14c	hos2	dsk1	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525413	2543378	2539847	279800	276395	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC530.14c	pac10	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.0589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525414	2543384	2539847	279806	276395	SPAC637.06	SPBC530.14c	gmh5	dsk1	SPAC637.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525415	2542102	2539847	278578	276395	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC530.14c	spc34	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525416	2539971	2539847	276515	276395	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC530.14c	cbp1	dsk1	abp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525417	2539667	2539847	276222	276395	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC530.14c	ash2	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.2561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525418	2539733	2539847	276285	276395	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC530.14c	pab2	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525419	2540664	2539847	277189	276395	SPBC215.02	SPBC530.14c	bob1	dsk1	gim5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525420	2540686	2539847	277211	276395	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC530.14c	bdc1	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525421	2540317	2539847	276847	276395	SPBC24C6.05	SPBC530.14c	sec28	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525422	2540498	2539847	277026	276395	SPBC27.02c	SPBC530.14c	ask1	dsk1	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525423	2540353	2539847	276882	276395	SPBC2F12.12c	SPBC530.14c	cay1	dsk1	SPBC2F12.12c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525424	2540968	2539847	277484	276395	SPBC3H7.07c	SPBC530.14c	ser2	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525425	2539673	2541045	276228	277560	SPBC13G1.10c	SPBC543.03c	mug81	pku80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525426	2540353	2541045	276882	277560	SPBC2F12.12c	SPBC543.03c	cay1	pku80	SPBC2F12.12c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525427	2542318	2540919	278784	277435	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC543.07	cph1	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525428	2542519	2540919	278977	277435	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC543.07	scs7	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525429	2541889	2540919	278379	277435	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC543.07	pom1	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525430	2543190	2540919	279619	277435	SPAC31F12.01	SPBC543.07	zds1	pek1	SPAC637.14|mug88	mkk1|skh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525431	2542519	2540893	278977	277409	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC543.10	scs7	get1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525432	2539604	2540893	276162	277409	SPBC1105.14	SPBC543.10	rsv2	get1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525433	2543263	2541080	279691	277595	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC557.04	med6	ppk29	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525434	2542168	2541080	278643	277595	SPAC17A5.16	SPBC557.04	ftp105	ppk29	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525435	2542519	2541080	278977	277595	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC557.04	scs7	ppk29	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525436	2543616	2541080	280030	277595	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC557.04	cwf21	ppk29	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525437	2540100	2541080	276638	277595	SPBC13E7.09	SPBC557.04	vrp1	ppk29	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525438	2540064	2541080	276602	277595	SPBC1718.02	SPBC557.04	hop1	ppk29	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525439	3361323	2541080	280399	277595	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC557.04	swi3	ppk29	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525440	2542318	2540913	278784	277429	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC56F2.08c	cph1	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525441	2542349	2540913	278814	277429	SPAC1782.05	SPBC56F2.08c	ypa2	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525442	2542363	2540913	278827	277429	SPAC1783.05	SPBC56F2.08c	hrp1	SPBC56F2.08c	chd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525443	2542207	2540913	278682	277429	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC56F2.08c	ddb1	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525444	2542126	2540913	278602	277429	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC56F2.08c	not3	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525445	2541496	2540913	277998	277429	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC56F2.08c	arp42	SPBC56F2.08c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525446	2542701	2540913	279154	277429	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC56F2.08c	mga2	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC26H5.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-18.6299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525447	2542516	2540913	278974	277429	SPAC2F7.04	SPBC56F2.08c	pmc2	SPBC56F2.08c	med1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525448	2541713	2540913	278208	277429	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC56F2.08c	atp11	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525449	2543577	2540913	279992	277429	SPAC4H3.05	SPBC56F2.08c	srs2	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525450	2542571	2540913	279027	277429	SPAC589.02c	SPBC56F2.08c	med13	SPBC56F2.08c	spTrap240|srb9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525451	2543384	2540913	279806	277429	SPAC637.06	SPBC56F2.08c	gmh5	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC637.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.6608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525452	2542845	2540913	279291	277429	SPAC824.04	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC824.04	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525453	2543341	2540913	279764	277429	SPAC8E11.07c	SPBC56F2.08c	alp31	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525454	2539971	2540913	276515	277429	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC56F2.08c	cbp1	SPBC56F2.08c	abp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525455	2539930	2540913	276474	277429	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC56F2.08c	reb1	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525456	2539651	2540913	276206	277429	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC56F2.08c	srb11	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.3734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525457	2540317	2540913	276847	277429	SPBC24C6.05	SPBC56F2.08c	sec28	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.2385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525458	2540498	2540913	277026	277429	SPBC27.02c	SPBC56F2.08c	ask1	SPBC56F2.08c	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525459	3361323	2540913	280399	277429	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC56F2.08c	swi3	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525460	2540968	2540913	277484	277429	SPBC3H7.07c	SPBC56F2.08c	ser2	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.8439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525461	2540749	2540913	277271	277429	SPBC4B4.03	SPBC56F2.08c	rsc1	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525462	2539911	2541098	276456	277613	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC577.13	amo1	syj2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525463	2539925	2540907	276469	277423	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC582.10c	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC582.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525464	2543263	2541101	279691	277616	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC609.02	med6	ptn1	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525465	2542469	2541101	278930	277616	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC609.02	erg5	ptn1	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525466	2541941	2541101	278428	277616	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC609.02	tfs1	ptn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525467	2541713	2541101	278208	277616	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC609.02	atp11	ptn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525468	2543452	2541101	279872	277616	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC609.02	ssu72	ptn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525469	2543384	2541101	279806	277616	SPAC637.06	SPBC609.02	gmh5	ptn1	SPAC637.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525470	2543240	2541101	279668	277616	SPAC694.06c	SPBC609.02	mrc1	ptn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.5204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525471	2543289	2541101	279714	277616	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC609.02	rad26	ptn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525472	2539920	2541101	276464	277616	SPBC119.08	SPBC609.02	pmk1	ptn1	spm1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525473	2539667	2541101	276222	277616	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC609.02	ash2	ptn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525474	2540353	2541101	276882	277616	SPBC2F12.12c	SPBC609.02	cay1	ptn1	SPBC2F12.12c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525475	2540396	2541101	276924	277616	SPBC31F10.12	SPBC609.02	tma20	ptn1	SPBC31F10.12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525476	2540219	2541101	276752	277616	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC609.02	hip1	ptn1	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525477	2543384	2541121	279806	277636	SPAC637.06	SPBC609.03	gmh5	iqw1	SPAC637.06	iqwd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525478	2543240	2541121	279668	277636	SPAC694.06c	SPBC609.03	mrc1	iqw1	-	iqwd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.0534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525479	2539651	2541121	276206	277636	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC609.03	srb11	iqw1	-	iqwd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525480	2539667	2541121	276222	277636	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC609.03	ash2	iqw1	-	iqwd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525481	2540353	2541121	276882	277636	SPBC2F12.12c	SPBC609.03	cay1	iqw1	SPBC2F12.12c	iqwd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525482	2543263	2541088	279691	277603	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC609.05	med6	pob3	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.1647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525483	2541536	2541088	278036	277603	SPAC1071.02	SPBC609.05	mms19	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525484	3361561	2541088	280637	277603	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC609.05	swr1	pob3	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-23.7851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525485	2542757	2541088	279207	277603	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC609.05	mre11	pob3	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525486	2541643	2541088	278139	277603	SPAC14C4.13	SPBC609.05	rad17	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525487	2542277	2541088	278746	277603	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC609.05	dbr1	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.2838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525488	2542421	2541088	278884	277603	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC609.05	med20	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.0345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525489	2542239	2541088	278711	277603	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC609.05	chp1	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525490	2542558	2541088	279014	277603	SPAC1952.07	SPBC609.05	rad1	pob3	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525491	2542462	2541088	278923	277603	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC609.05	SPAC19B12.11c	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525492	2542237	2541088	278709	277603	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC609.05	fin1	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525493	2542126	2541088	278602	277603	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC609.05	not3	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525494	2541468	2541088	277970	277603	SPAC1F5.09c	SPBC609.05	shk2	pob3	pak2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525495	2541899	2541088	278389	277603	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC609.05	set3	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525496	2541798	2541088	278289	277603	SPAC22F3.03c	SPBC609.05	rdh54	pob3	mug34|tid1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.6854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525497	2541871	2541088	278361	277603	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC609.05	res2	pob3	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525498	2541885	2541088	278375	277603	SPAC22H10.03c	SPBC609.05	kap114	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.2999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525499	2541496	2541088	277998	277603	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC609.05	arp42	pob3	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.8488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525500	2541531	2541088	278031	277603	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC609.05	fft3	pob3	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.7296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525501	2541656	2541088	278152	277603	SPAC25H1.06	SPBC609.05	pcf3	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525502	2542081	2541088	278558	277603	SPAC26H5.04	SPBC609.05	SPAC26H5.04	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.5633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525503	2541614	2541088	278111	277603	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC609.05	elp3	pob3	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525504	2542516	2541088	278974	277603	SPAC2F7.04	SPBC609.05	pmc2	pob3	med1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525505	2541710	2541088	278205	277603	SPAC343.11c	SPBC609.05	msc1	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525506	2543452	2541088	279872	277603	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC609.05	ssu72	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.1676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525507	2543643	2541088	280057	277603	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC609.05	hos2	pob3	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525508	2543443	2541088	279863	277603	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC609.05	snt2	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525509	2543667	2541088	280081	277603	SPAC4H3.02c	SPBC609.05	swc3	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.4122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525510	2543426	2541088	279846	277603	SPAC631.02	SPBC609.05	bdf2	pob3	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-19.1056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525511	2543580	2541088	279995	277603	SPAC644.14c	SPBC609.05	rad51	pob3	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525512	2543563	2541088	279979	277603	SPAC664.02c	SPBC609.05	arp8	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.2108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525513	2543544	2541088	279961	277603	SPAC664.07c	SPBC609.05	rad9	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.79	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525514	2543240	2541088	279668	277603	SPAC694.06c	SPBC609.05	mrc1	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525515	2543226	2541088	279654	277603	SPAC6B12.05c	SPBC609.05	ies2	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525516	2542198	2541088	278673	277603	SPAC6F12.09	SPBC609.05	rdp1	pob3	rdr1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.2848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525517	2542845	2541088	279291	277603	SPAC824.04	SPBC609.05	SPAC824.04	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.8085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525518	2543289	2541088	279714	277603	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC609.05	rad26	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.1298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525519	2542192	2541088	278667	277603	SPAC9G1.12	SPBC609.05	cpd1	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525520	2543387	2541088	279809	277603	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC609.05	mcl1	pob3	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525521	2543670	2541088	280084	277603	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC609.05	eme1	pob3	mms4|slx2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.5061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525522	2539920	2541088	276464	277603	SPBC119.08	SPBC609.05	pmk1	pob3	spm1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525523	2540159	2541088	276694	277603	SPBC12C2.08	SPBC609.05	dnm1	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525524	2539812	2541088	276362	277603	SPBC1347.02	SPBC609.05	fkbp39	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525525	2539667	2541088	276222	277603	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC609.05	ash2	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525526	2539700	2541088	276253	277603	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC609.05	klp6	pob3	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525527	2539733	2541088	276285	277603	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC609.05	pab2	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525528	2539925	2541088	276469	277603	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC609.05	SPBC16H5.13	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525529	2539953	2541088	276497	277603	SPBC1709.11c	SPBC609.05	png2	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.8653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525530	2540352	2541088	276881	277603	SPBC215.03c	SPBC609.05	csn1	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.51	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525531	2540686	2541088	277211	277603	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC609.05	bdc1	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525532	2540531	2541088	277059	277603	SPBC23E6.08	SPBC609.05	sat1	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525533	2540498	2541088	277026	277603	SPBC27.02c	SPBC609.05	ask1	pob3	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525534	2540512	2541088	277040	277603	SPBC29A3.05	SPBC609.05	vps71	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.9522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525535	2540353	2541088	276882	277603	SPBC2F12.12c	SPBC609.05	cay1	pob3	SPBC2F12.12c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525536	2540306	2541088	276836	277603	SPBC2G5.02c	SPBC609.05	ckb2	pob3	SPBC2G5.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525537	2540327	2541088	276857	277603	SPBC31F10.07	SPBC609.05	lsb5	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525538	2540322	2541088	276852	277603	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC609.05	SPBC31F10.10c	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525539	2540219	2541088	276752	277603	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC609.05	hip1	pob3	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.7142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525540	2540220	2541088	276753	277603	SPBC337.03	SPBC609.05	rhn1	pob3	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525541	2540967	2541088	277483	277603	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC609.05	SPBC36B7.08c	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525542	2540968	2541088	277484	277603	SPBC3H7.07c	SPBC609.05	ser2	pob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.6829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525543	2542925	2541120	279366	277635	SPAC11E3.04c	SPBC649.03	ubc13	rhp14	spu13|sst5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.58	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525544	2542757	2541120	279207	277635	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC649.03	mre11	rhp14	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.0513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525545	3361391	2541120	280467	277635	SPAC13G6.01c	SPBC649.03	rad8	rhp14	SPAC5H10.14c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525546	2541643	2541120	278139	277635	SPAC14C4.13	SPBC649.03	rad17	rhp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-22.0734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525547	2542111	2541120	278587	277635	SPAC1687.14c	SPBC649.03	SPAC1687.14c	rhp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525548	2542318	2541120	278784	277635	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC649.03	cph1	rhp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.2877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525549	2542278	2541120	278747	277635	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC649.03	yaf9	rhp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525550	2542418	2541120	278881	277635	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC649.03	dad2	rhp14	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525551	2542558	2541120	279014	277635	SPAC1952.07	SPBC649.03	rad1	rhp14	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-22.5144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525552	2541746	2541120	278240	277635	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC649.03	hus1	rhp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-21.6706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525553	2542007	2541120	278490	277635	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC649.03	rad57	rhp14	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.1831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525554	2541871	2541120	278361	277635	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC649.03	res2	rhp14	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525555	2542032	2541120	278514	277635	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC649.03	pnk1	rhp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525556	2541776	2541120	278270	277635	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC649.03	swd1	rhp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525557	2542094	2541120	278571	277635	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC649.03	rcd1	rhp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525558	2543510	2541120	279928	277635	SPAC30D11.07	SPBC649.03	nth1	rhp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525559	2543577	2541120	279992	277635	SPAC4H3.05	SPBC649.03	srs2	rhp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525560	2543580	2541120	279995	277635	SPAC644.14c	SPBC649.03	rad51	rhp14	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.1115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525561	2543544	2541120	279961	277635	SPAC664.07c	SPBC649.03	rad9	rhp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-18.7866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525562	2543668	2541120	280082	277635	SPAC9.05	SPBC649.03	fml1	rhp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525563	2543289	2541120	279714	277635	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC649.03	rad26	rhp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-19.6745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525564	2543670	2541120	280084	277635	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC649.03	eme1	rhp14	mms4|slx2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.0858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525565	2539668	2541120	276223	277635	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC649.03	pht1	rhp14	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525566	2539953	2541120	276497	277635	SPBC1709.11c	SPBC649.03	png2	rhp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525567	2539999	2541120	276543	277635	SPBC1734.15	SPBC649.03	rsc4	rhp14	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525568	2540115	2541120	276652	277635	SPBC1778.02	SPBC649.03	rap1	rhp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525569	2540352	2541120	276881	277635	SPBC215.03c	SPBC649.03	csn1	rhp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525570	2540498	2541120	277026	277635	SPBC27.02c	SPBC649.03	ask1	rhp14	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525571	2540348	2541120	276877	277635	SPBC29A10.05	SPBC649.03	exo1	rhp14	mut2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525572	2540523	2541120	277051	277635	SPBC29A10.10c	SPBC649.03	dbl8	rhp14	SPBC29A10.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.2237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525573	2540492	2541120	277020	277635	SPBC2D10.13	SPBC649.03	est1	rhp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525574	2540992	2541120	277508	277635	SPBC342.05	SPBC649.03	crb2	rhp14	rhp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-21.0581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525575	2540913	2541120	277429	277635	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC649.03	SPBC56F2.08c	rhp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525576	2542861	2541147	279307	277662	SPAC13G7.13c	SPBC651.05c	msa1	dot2	SPAC6C3.01c	vps22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525577	2542522	2541147	278980	277662	SPAC19A8.03	SPBC651.05c	ymr1	dot2	SPAC19A8.03	vps22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525578	2542126	2541147	278602	277662	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC651.05c	not3	dot2	-	vps22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525579	2542459	2541147	278920	277662	SPAC1D4.03c	SPBC651.05c	aut12	dot2	-	vps22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525580	2542701	2541147	279154	277662	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC651.05c	mga2	dot2	SPAC26H5.05	vps22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525581	2543190	2541147	279619	277662	SPAC31F12.01	SPBC651.05c	zds1	dot2	SPAC637.14|mug88	vps22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525582	2539930	2541147	276474	277662	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC651.05c	reb1	dot2	SPBC660.01c	vps22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525583	2541101	2541147	277616	277662	SPBC609.02	SPBC651.05c	ptn1	dot2	-	vps22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525584	2542701	2541062	279154	277577	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC660.11	mga2	tcg1	SPAC26H5.05	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525585	2542757	2541158	279207	277673	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC660.13c	mre11	ssb1	rad32	rad11|rpa1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525586	2543240	2541158	279668	277673	SPAC694.06c	SPBC660.13c	mrc1	ssb1	-	rad11|rpa1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525587	3361323	2541158	280399	277673	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC660.13c	swi3	ssb1	-	rad11|rpa1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525588	2540064	2541109	276602	277624	SPBC1718.02	SPBC6B1.02	hop1	ppk30	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525589	2540320	2541109	276850	277624	SPBC3D6.04c	SPBC6B1.02	mad1	ppk30	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525590	2540979	2541109	277495	277624	SPBC3H7.10	SPBC6B1.02	elp6	ppk30	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525591	2540825	2541109	277343	277624	SPBC428.08c	SPBC6B1.02	clr4	ppk30	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525592	2542469	2541095	278930	277610	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC725.06c	erg5	ppk31	cyp61	mug25	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525593	2540317	2541095	276847	277610	SPBC24C6.05	SPBC725.06c	sec28	ppk31	-	mug25	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525594	2542833	2541166	279280	277681	SPAC13F5.01c	SPBC725.15	msh1	ura5	SPAC23C11.18c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525595	2542558	2541166	279014	277681	SPAC1952.07	SPBC725.15	rad1	ura5	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525596	2541468	2541166	277970	277681	SPAC1F5.09c	SPBC725.15	shk2	ura5	pak2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525597	2541496	2541166	277998	277681	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC725.15	arp42	ura5	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525598	2543426	2541166	279846	277681	SPAC631.02	SPBC725.15	bdf2	ura5	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.5831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525599	2543384	2541166	279806	277681	SPAC637.06	SPBC725.15	gmh5	ura5	SPAC637.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525600	2543544	2541166	279961	277681	SPAC664.07c	SPBC725.15	rad9	ura5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525601	2539911	2541166	276456	277681	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC725.15	amo1	ura5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525602	2540749	2541166	277271	277681	SPBC4B4.03	SPBC725.15	rsc1	ura5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525603	2541088	2541166	277603	277681	SPBC609.05	SPBC725.15	pob3	ura5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525604	2541536	2540821	278036	277339	SPAC1071.02	SPBC800.03	mms19	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525605	2542135	2540821	278611	277339	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC800.03	ubp8	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525606	2542757	2540821	279207	277339	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC800.03	mre11	clr3	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.1609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525607	2541580	2540821	278077	277339	SPAC1687.05	SPBC800.03	pli1	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525608	2542318	2540821	278784	277339	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC800.03	cph1	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.6274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525609	2542421	2540821	278884	277339	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC800.03	med20	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525610	2542278	2540821	278747	277339	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC800.03	yaf9	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.6501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525611	2542207	2540821	278682	277339	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC800.03	ddb1	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525612	2542239	2540821	278711	277339	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC800.03	chp1	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525613	2542568	2540821	279024	277339	SPAC1952.02	SPBC800.03	tma23	clr3	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525614	2542007	2540821	278490	277339	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC800.03	rad57	clr3	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525615	2541899	2540821	278389	277339	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC800.03	set3	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525616	2541776	2540821	278270	277339	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC800.03	swd1	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.4007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525617	2541531	2540821	278031	277339	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC800.03	fft3	clr3	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525618	2541614	2540821	278111	277339	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC800.03	elp3	clr3	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525619	2543643	2540821	280057	277339	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC800.03	hos2	clr3	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525620	2543443	2540821	279863	277339	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC800.03	snt2	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525621	2543619	2540821	280033	277339	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC800.03	ypa1	clr3	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525622	2543580	2540821	279995	277339	SPAC644.14c	SPBC800.03	rad51	clr3	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525623	2541633	2540821	278129	277339	SPAC664.01c	SPBC800.03	swi6	clr3	SPAC824.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525624	2543240	2540821	279668	277339	SPAC694.06c	SPBC800.03	mrc1	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525625	2543670	2540821	280084	277339	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC800.03	eme1	clr3	mms4|slx2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525626	2539812	2540821	276362	277339	SPBC1347.02	SPBC800.03	fkbp39	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525627	2539667	2540821	276222	277339	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC800.03	ash2	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.5372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525628	2540154	2540821	276690	277339	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC800.03	SPBC16C6.05	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.84	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525629	3361342	2540821	280418	277339	SPBC16D10.07c	SPBC800.03	sir2	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525630	2539925	2540821	276469	277339	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC800.03	SPBC16H5.13	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525631	2540822	2540821	277340	277339	SPBC18E5.05c	SPBC800.03	elp5	clr3	iki1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525632	2540788	2540821	277307	277339	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC800.03	swd2	clr3	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.3734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525633	2540352	2540821	276881	277339	SPBC215.03c	SPBC800.03	csn1	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525634	2540686	2540821	277211	277339	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC800.03	bdc1	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.6708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525635	2540436	2540821	276964	277339	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC800.03	ngg1	clr3	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525636	2540597	2540821	277123	277339	SPBC29A3.09c	SPBC800.03	SPBC29A3.09c	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525637	2540353	2540821	276882	277339	SPBC2F12.12c	SPBC800.03	cay1	clr3	SPBC2F12.12c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.6185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525638	2540219	2540821	276752	277339	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC800.03	hip1	clr3	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525639	2540244	2540821	276776	277339	SPBC336.01	SPBC800.03	fbh1	clr3	fdh|fdh1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525640	2540320	2540821	276850	277339	SPBC3D6.04c	SPBC800.03	mad1	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525641	2540749	2540821	277271	277339	SPBC4B4.03	SPBC800.03	rsc1	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525642	2540999	2540821	277515	277339	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC800.03	SPBC4B4.04	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525643	2541088	2540821	277603	277339	SPBC609.05	SPBC800.03	pob3	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525644	2541628	2540936	278124	277452	SPAC110.02	SPBC800.05c	pds5	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.0268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525645	2542757	2540936	279207	277452	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC800.05c	mre11	atb2	rad32	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.8803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525646	2542318	2540936	278784	277452	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC800.05c	cph1	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525647	2542349	2540936	278814	277452	SPAC1782.05	SPBC800.05c	ypa2	atb2	SPAC1782.05|pta2	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525648	2542418	2540936	278881	277452	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC800.05c	dad2	atb2	hos2	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.4606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525649	2542513	2540936	278971	277452	SPAC1952.05	SPBC800.05c	gcn5	atb2	kat2	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525650	2542007	2540936	278490	277452	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC800.05c	rad57	atb2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.0504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525651	2542032	2540936	278514	277452	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC800.05c	pnk1	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525652	2541856	2540936	278347	277452	SPAC23H3.08c	SPBC800.05c	bub3	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.5057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525653	2542701	2540936	279154	277452	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC800.05c	mga2	atb2	SPAC26H5.05	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.3265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525654	2541614	2540936	278111	277452	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC800.05c	elp3	atb2	kat9	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525655	2543078	2540936	279511	277452	SPAC31A2.15c	SPBC800.05c	dcc1	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525656	2543190	2540936	279619	277452	SPAC31F12.01	SPBC800.05c	zds1	atb2	SPAC637.14|mug88	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525657	2543399	2540936	279821	277452	SPAC3G9.12	SPBC800.05c	peg1	atb2	cls1	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.7282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525658	2541633	2540936	278129	277452	SPAC664.01c	SPBC800.05c	swi6	atb2	SPAC824.10c	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.4712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525659	2543240	2540936	279668	277452	SPAC694.06c	SPBC800.05c	mrc1	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525660	2542198	2540936	278673	277452	SPAC6F12.09	SPBC800.05c	rdp1	atb2	rdr1	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525661	2542102	2540936	278578	277452	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC800.05c	spc34	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.6355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525662	2543372	2540936	279794	277452	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC800.05c	ase1	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-22.3937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525663	2540498	2540936	277026	277452	SPBC27.02c	SPBC800.05c	ask1	atb2	mug181	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-19.3304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525664	2540436	2540936	276964	277452	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC800.05c	ngg1	atb2	ada3|kap1	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525665	2540322	2540936	276852	277452	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC800.05c	SPBC31F10.10c	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525666	2541536	2540829	278036	277347	SPAC1071.02	SPBC800.09	mms19	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525667	2541650	2540829	278146	277347	SPAC14C4.12c	SPBC800.09	laf1	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525668	2541580	2540829	278077	277347	SPAC1687.05	SPBC800.09	pli1	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525669	2542318	2540829	278784	277347	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC800.09	cph1	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525670	2542421	2540829	278884	277347	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC800.09	med20	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.3029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525671	2542123	2540829	278599	277347	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC800.09	mal3	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525672	2542522	2540829	278980	277347	SPAC19A8.03	SPBC800.09	ymr1	sum2	SPAC19A8.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525673	2542007	2540829	278490	277347	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC800.09	rad57	sum2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525674	2542032	2540829	278514	277347	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC800.09	pnk1	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.9083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525675	2541496	2540829	277998	277347	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC800.09	arp42	sum2	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525676	2542701	2540829	279154	277347	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC800.09	mga2	sum2	SPAC26H5.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525677	2543190	2540829	279619	277347	SPAC31F12.01	SPBC800.09	zds1	sum2	SPAC637.14|mug88	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525678	2542592	2540829	279047	277347	SPAC328.01c	SPBC800.09	msn5	sum2	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525679	2543616	2540829	280030	277347	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC800.09	cwf21	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525680	2543226	2540829	279654	277347	SPAC6B12.05c	SPBC800.09	ies2	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525681	2539667	2540829	276222	277347	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC800.09	ash2	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525682	2539911	2540829	276456	277347	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC800.09	amo1	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525683	2539857	2540829	276404	277347	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC800.09	tea2	sum2	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525684	2539999	2540829	276543	277347	SPBC1734.15	SPBC800.09	rsc4	sum2	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525685	2540837	2540829	277355	277347	SPBC18H10.08c	SPBC800.09	ubp4	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525686	2540686	2540829	277211	277347	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC800.09	bdc1	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.08	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525687	2540512	2540829	277040	277347	SPBC29A3.05	SPBC800.09	vps71	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525688	2540322	2540829	276852	277347	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC800.09	SPBC31F10.10c	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.76	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525689	2540221	2540829	276754	277347	SPBC32F12.02	SPBC800.09	rec14	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525690	2540220	2540829	276753	277347	SPBC337.03	SPBC800.09	rhn1	sum2	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525691	2540995	2540829	277511	277347	SPBC337.16	SPBC800.09	cho1	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.6211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525692	2540967	2540829	277483	277347	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC800.09	SPBC36B7.08c	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525693	2541642	2540735	278138	277258	SPAC10F6.05c	SPBC83.03c	ubc6	tas3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525694	2541628	2540735	278124	277258	SPAC110.02	SPBC83.03c	pds5	tas3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525695	2541650	2540735	278146	277258	SPAC14C4.12c	SPBC83.03c	laf1	tas3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525696	2542788	2540735	279237	277258	SPAC15A10.15	SPBC83.03c	sgo2	tas3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525697	2542318	2540735	278784	277258	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC83.03c	cph1	tas3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525698	2542277	2540735	278746	277258	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC83.03c	dbr1	tas3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525699	2542207	2540735	278682	277258	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC83.03c	ddb1	tas3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525700	2542418	2540735	278881	277258	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC83.03c	dad2	tas3	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525701	2542123	2540735	278599	277258	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC83.03c	mal3	tas3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.2964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525702	2542237	2540735	278709	277258	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC83.03c	fin1	tas3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.8819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525703	2542519	2540735	278977	277258	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC83.03c	scs7	tas3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525704	2542023	2540735	278506	277258	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC83.03c	ufd2	tas3	SPAC145.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525705	2541496	2540735	277998	277258	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC83.03c	arp42	tas3	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.6738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525706	2541856	2540735	278347	277258	SPAC23H3.08c	SPBC83.03c	bub3	tas3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525707	2541531	2540735	278031	277258	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC83.03c	fft3	tas3	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525708	2541614	2540735	278111	277258	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC83.03c	elp3	tas3	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525709	2541889	2540735	278379	277258	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC83.03c	pom1	tas3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525710	2543078	2540735	279511	277258	SPAC31A2.15c	SPBC83.03c	dcc1	tas3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525711	2543118	2540735	279550	277258	SPAC3G6.11	SPBC83.03c	chl1	tas3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525712	2543529	2540735	279947	277258	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC83.03c	ryh1	tas3	hos1|sat7	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525713	2543619	2540735	280033	277258	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC83.03c	ypa1	tas3	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525714	2543580	2540735	279995	277258	SPAC644.14c	SPBC83.03c	rad51	tas3	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525715	2543240	2540735	279668	277258	SPAC694.06c	SPBC83.03c	mrc1	tas3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.6623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525716	2543341	2540735	279764	277258	SPAC8E11.07c	SPBC83.03c	alp31	tas3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525717	2543289	2540735	279714	277258	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC83.03c	rad26	tas3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525718	2543372	2540735	279794	277258	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC83.03c	ase1	tas3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.7763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525719	2543670	2540735	280084	277258	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC83.03c	eme1	tas3	mms4|slx2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525720	2540060	2540735	276598	277258	SPBC106.01	SPBC83.03c	mph1	tas3	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525721	2539971	2540735	276515	277258	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC83.03c	cbp1	tas3	abp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525722	2539651	2540735	276206	277258	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC83.03c	srb11	tas3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525723	2539812	2540735	276362	277258	SPBC1347.02	SPBC83.03c	fkbp39	tas3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-24.5989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525724	2540115	2540735	276652	277258	SPBC1778.02	SPBC83.03c	rap1	tas3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525725	2540589	2540735	277115	277258	SPBC20F10.06	SPBC83.03c	mad2	tas3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525726	2540531	2540735	277059	277258	SPBC23E6.08	SPBC83.03c	sat1	tas3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525727	2540512	2540735	277040	277258	SPBC29A3.05	SPBC83.03c	vps71	tas3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525728	2540492	2540735	277020	277258	SPBC2D10.13	SPBC83.03c	est1	tas3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525729	3361323	2540735	280399	277258	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC83.03c	swi3	tas3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525730	2540945	2540735	277461	277258	SPBC342.06c	SPBC83.03c	rtt109	tas3	kat11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525731	2541017	2540735	277532	277258	SPBC36.07	SPBC83.03c	elp1	tas3	iki3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525732	2540749	2540735	277271	277258	SPBC4B4.03	SPBC83.03c	rsc1	tas3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525733	2540821	2540735	277339	277258	SPBC800.03	SPBC83.03c	clr3	tas3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9462	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525734	2540936	2540735	277452	277258	SPBC800.05c	SPBC83.03c	atb2	tas3	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525735	2542519	2540741	278977	277264	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC83.05	scs7	SPBC83.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.5267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525736	2540492	2540741	277020	277264	SPBC2D10.13	SPBC83.05	est1	SPBC83.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525737	2540749	2540741	277271	277264	SPBC4B4.03	SPBC83.05	rsc1	SPBC83.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525738	2542318	2541135	278784	277650	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC839.03c	cph1	SPBC839.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.6537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525739	2542207	2541135	278682	277650	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC839.03c	ddb1	SPBC839.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.1853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525740	2542418	2541135	278881	277650	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC839.03c	dad2	SPBC839.03c	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525741	2542558	2541135	279014	277650	SPAC1952.07	SPBC839.03c	rad1	SPBC839.03c	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525742	2542007	2541135	278490	277650	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC839.03c	rad57	SPBC839.03c	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525743	2543529	2541135	279947	277650	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC839.03c	ryh1	SPBC839.03c	hos1|sat7	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525744	2543544	2541135	279961	277650	SPAC664.07c	SPBC839.03c	rad9	SPBC839.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525745	2543240	2541135	279668	277650	SPAC694.06c	SPBC839.03c	mrc1	SPBC839.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525746	2543289	2541135	279714	277650	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC839.03c	rad26	SPBC839.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525747	2542021	2541135	278504	277650	SPAP14E8.02	SPBC839.03c	tos4	SPBC839.03c	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525748	2539911	2541135	276456	277650	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC839.03c	amo1	SPBC839.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525749	2540498	2541135	277026	277650	SPBC27.02c	SPBC839.03c	ask1	SPBC839.03c	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525750	3361323	2541135	280399	277650	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC839.03c	swi3	SPBC839.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525751	2540322	2541135	276852	277650	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC839.03c	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC839.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525752	2540945	2541135	277461	277650	SPBC342.06c	SPBC839.03c	rtt109	SPBC839.03c	kat11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.9744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525753	2543263	2541175	279691	277689	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC839.13c	med6	rpl1601	pmc5	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525754	2542363	2541175	278827	277689	SPAC1783.05	SPBC839.13c	hrp1	rpl1601	chd1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525755	2542277	2541175	278746	277689	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC839.13c	dbr1	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525756	2542207	2541175	278682	277689	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC839.13c	ddb1	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525757	2542469	2541175	278930	277689	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC839.13c	erg5	rpl1601	cyp61	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525758	2542519	2541175	278977	277689	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC839.13c	scs7	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525759	3361533	2541175	280609	277689	SPAC222.15	SPBC839.13c	meu13	rpl1601	SPAC821.01	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525760	2542032	2541175	278514	277689	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC839.13c	pnk1	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525761	2542592	2541175	279047	277689	SPAC328.01c	SPBC839.13c	msn5	rpl1601	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525762	2542571	2541175	279027	277689	SPAC589.02c	SPBC839.13c	med13	rpl1601	spTrap240|srb9	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525763	2541819	2541175	278310	277689	SPAC6G9.08	SPBC839.13c	ubp6	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525764	2542102	2541175	278578	277689	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC839.13c	spc34	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525765	2543530	2541175	279948	277689	SPAC926.07c	SPBC839.13c	dlc2	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525766	2543372	2541175	279794	277689	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC839.13c	ase1	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.6759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525767	2539651	2541175	276206	277689	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC839.13c	srb11	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.79	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525768	2539787	2541175	276337	277689	SPBC15C4.06c	SPBC839.13c	SPBC15C4.06c	rpl1601	SPBC21H7.01c	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525769	2539925	2541175	276469	277689	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC839.13c	SPBC16H5.13	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525770	2540686	2541175	277211	277689	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC839.13c	bdc1	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525771	2540498	2541175	277026	277689	SPBC27.02c	SPBC839.13c	ask1	rpl1601	mug181	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525772	2540513	2541175	277041	277689	SPBC29A3.08	SPBC839.13c	pof4	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525773	2540967	2541175	277483	277689	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC839.13c	SPBC36B7.08c	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525774	2540913	2541175	277429	277689	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC839.13c	SPBC56F2.08c	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525775	2542757	2541208	279207	277722	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC887.04c	mre11	lub1	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525776	2542418	2541208	278881	277722	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC887.04c	dad2	lub1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525777	2542568	2541208	279024	277722	SPAC1952.02	SPBC887.04c	tma23	lub1	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525778	2542462	2541208	278923	277722	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC887.04c	SPAC19B12.11c	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525779	2542519	2541208	278977	277722	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC887.04c	scs7	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.2991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525780	2542126	2541208	278602	277722	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC887.04c	not3	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.3358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525781	2542036	2541208	278518	277722	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC887.04c	hrq1	lub1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525782	2542094	2541208	278571	277722	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC887.04c	rcd1	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525783	2543529	2541208	279947	277722	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC887.04c	ryh1	lub1	hos1|sat7	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525784	2543563	2541208	279979	277722	SPAC664.02c	SPBC887.04c	arp8	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.0628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525785	2543240	2541208	279668	277722	SPAC694.06c	SPBC887.04c	mrc1	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525786	2541819	2541208	278310	277722	SPAC6G9.08	SPBC887.04c	ubp6	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525787	2539911	2541208	276456	277722	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC887.04c	amo1	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.8924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525788	2540276	2541208	276807	277722	SPBC2A9.03	SPBC887.04c	SPBC2A9.03	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525789	2540560	2541208	277087	277722	SPBC2D10.14c	SPBC887.04c	myo51	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525790	2540221	2541208	276754	277722	SPBC32F12.02	SPBC887.04c	rec14	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525791	2540913	2541208	277429	277722	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC887.04c	SPBC56F2.08c	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525792	2540735	2541208	277258	277722	SPBC83.03c	SPBC887.04c	tas3	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525793	2541175	2541208	277689	277722	SPBC839.13c	SPBC887.04c	rpl1601	lub1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525794	2541536	2541200	278036	277714	SPAC1071.02	SPBC8D2.03c	mms19	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525795	2542278	2541200	278747	277714	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC8D2.03c	yaf9	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525796	2542418	2541200	278881	277714	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC8D2.03c	dad2	hhf2	hos2	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.2844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525797	2542463	2541200	278924	277714	SPAC1834.03c	SPBC8D2.03c	hhf1	hhf2	h4.1	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.4626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525798	2542519	2541200	278977	277714	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC8D2.03c	scs7	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525799	2539700	2541200	276253	277714	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC8D2.03c	klp6	hhf2	SPBC649.01c|sot2	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525800	2542318	2541220	278784	277734	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC8D2.04	cph1	hht2	-	h3.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525801	2542467	2541220	278928	277734	SPAC1834.04	SPBC8D2.04	hht1	hht2	-	h3.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525802	2542519	2541220	278977	277734	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC8D2.04	scs7	hht2	-	h3.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525803	2543563	2541220	279979	277734	SPAC664.02c	SPBC8D2.04	arp8	hht2	-	h3.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-21.3544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525804	2539804	2541220	276354	277734	SPBC1105.11c	SPBC8D2.04	hht3	hht2	h3.3	h3.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525805	2539911	2541220	276456	277734	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC8D2.04	amo1	hht2	-	h3.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525806	2540219	2541220	276752	277734	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC8D2.04	hip1	hht2	hir1	h3.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525807	2542519	2541259	278977	277773	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC8D2.16c	scs7	SPBC8D2.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525808	2542519	2541254	278977	277768	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC8D2.19	scs7	mde3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525809	2539651	2541254	276206	277768	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC8D2.19	srb11	mde3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525810	2543263	2541270	279691	277784	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC902.02c	med6	ctf18	pmc5	chl12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525811	2541628	2541270	278124	277784	SPAC110.02	SPBC902.02c	pds5	ctf18	-	chl12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525812	2542318	2541270	278784	277784	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC902.02c	cph1	ctf18	-	chl12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.6835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525813	2542421	2541270	278884	277784	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC902.02c	med20	ctf18	-	chl12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.5457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525814	2542207	2541270	278682	277784	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC902.02c	ddb1	ctf18	-	chl12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525815	2542418	2541270	278881	277784	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC902.02c	dad2	ctf18	hos2	chl12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.7783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525816	2542237	2541270	278709	277784	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC902.02c	fin1	ctf18	-	chl12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.6557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525817	2541496	2541270	277998	277784	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC902.02c	arp42	ctf18	arp4	chl12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525818	2542667	2541270	279120	277784	SPAC26A3.16	SPBC902.02c	dph1	ctf18	ucp5	chl12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525819	2541672	2541270	278168	277784	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC902.02c	lsk1	ctf18	-	chl12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525820	2543118	2541270	279550	277784	SPAC3G6.11	SPBC902.02c	chl1	ctf18	-	chl12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-22.5891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525821	2543240	2541270	279668	277784	SPAC694.06c	SPBC902.02c	mrc1	ctf18	-	chl12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.1345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525822	2542845	2541270	279291	277784	SPAC824.04	SPBC902.02c	SPAC824.04	ctf18	-	chl12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525823	2542102	2541270	278578	277784	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC902.02c	spc34	ctf18	-	chl12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.3756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525824	2543289	2541270	279714	277784	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC902.02c	rad26	ctf18	-	chl12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.45	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525825	2543670	2541270	280084	277784	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC902.02c	eme1	ctf18	mms4|slx2	chl12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525826	2540352	2541270	276881	277784	SPBC215.03c	SPBC902.02c	csn1	ctf18	-	chl12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525827	2540498	2541270	277026	277784	SPBC27.02c	SPBC902.02c	ask1	ctf18	mug181	chl12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.3272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525828	2540353	2541270	276882	277784	SPBC2F12.12c	SPBC902.02c	cay1	ctf18	SPBC2F12.12c	chl12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525829	3361323	2541270	280399	277784	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC902.02c	swi3	ctf18	-	chl12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.0534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525830	2540219	2541270	276752	277784	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC902.02c	hip1	ctf18	hir1	chl12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525831	2540320	2541270	276850	277784	SPBC3D6.04c	SPBC902.02c	mad1	ctf18	-	chl12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525832	2540735	2541270	277258	277784	SPBC83.03c	SPBC902.02c	tas3	ctf18	-	chl12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525833	2543263	2541284	279691	277797	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC947.08c	med6	hip4	pmc5	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525834	2541536	2541284	278036	277797	SPAC1071.02	SPBC947.08c	mms19	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.1221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525835	3361433	2541284	280509	277797	SPAC1071.12c	SPBC947.08c	stp1	hip4	SPAC926.01c	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525836	2541628	2541284	278124	277797	SPAC110.02	SPBC947.08c	pds5	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525837	3361561	2541284	280637	277797	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC947.08c	swr1	hip4	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525838	2542757	2541284	279207	277797	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC947.08c	mre11	hip4	rad32	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525839	2542861	2541284	279307	277797	SPAC13G7.13c	SPBC947.08c	msa1	hip4	SPAC6C3.01c	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525840	2541650	2541284	278146	277797	SPAC14C4.12c	SPBC947.08c	laf1	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525841	2541580	2541284	278077	277797	SPAC1687.05	SPBC947.08c	pli1	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.4228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525842	2542111	2541284	278587	277797	SPAC1687.14c	SPBC947.08c	SPAC1687.14c	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525843	2542318	2541284	278784	277797	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC947.08c	cph1	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.9975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525844	2542363	2541284	278827	277797	SPAC1783.05	SPBC947.08c	hrp1	hip4	chd1	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525845	2542277	2541284	278746	277797	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC947.08c	dbr1	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525846	2542168	2541284	278643	277797	SPAC17A5.16	SPBC947.08c	ftp105	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525847	2542278	2541284	278747	277797	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC947.08c	yaf9	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.1629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525848	2542207	2541284	278682	277797	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC947.08c	ddb1	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525849	2542418	2541284	278881	277797	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC947.08c	dad2	hip4	hos2	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525850	2542463	2541284	278924	277797	SPAC1834.03c	SPBC947.08c	hhf1	hip4	h4.1	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.2816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525851	2542239	2541284	278711	277797	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC947.08c	chp1	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.0249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525852	2542123	2541284	278599	277797	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC947.08c	mal3	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.3705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525853	2542462	2541284	278923	277797	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC947.08c	SPAC19B12.11c	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525854	2542466	2541284	278927	277797	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC947.08c	nup40	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525855	2542582	2541284	279037	277797	SPAC19G12.02c	SPBC947.08c	pms1	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525856	2542519	2541284	278977	277797	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC947.08c	scs7	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.6345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525857	2542541	2541284	278998	277797	SPAC1B3.03c	SPBC947.08c	wis2	hip4	cyp5	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525858	2542007	2541284	278490	277797	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC947.08c	rad57	hip4	rhp57|SPAC145.01	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525859	2542023	2541284	278506	277797	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC947.08c	ufd2	hip4	SPAC145.04	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525860	2541483	2541284	277985	277797	SPAC227.14	SPBC947.08c	SPAC227.14	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525861	2541899	2541284	278389	277797	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC947.08c	set3	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525862	2541786	2541284	278278	277797	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC947.08c	rok1	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525863	2541871	2541284	278361	277797	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC947.08c	res2	hip4	mcs1|pct1	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.8794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525864	2541885	2541284	278375	277797	SPAC22H10.03c	SPBC947.08c	kap114	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525865	2541496	2541284	277998	277797	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC947.08c	arp42	hip4	arp4	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.1445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525866	2541438	2541284	277943	277797	SPAC23G3.10c	SPBC947.08c	ssr3	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525867	2541776	2541284	278270	277797	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC947.08c	swd1	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525868	2541856	2541284	278347	277797	SPAC23H3.08c	SPBC947.08c	bub3	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525869	2541872	2541284	278362	277797	SPAC23H4.10c	SPBC947.08c	thi4	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525870	2541531	2541284	278031	277797	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC947.08c	fft3	hip4	snf2SR	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.3858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525871	2541656	2541284	278152	277797	SPAC25H1.06	SPBC947.08c	pcf3	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.4949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525872	2542071	2541284	278548	277797	SPAC26H5.03	SPBC947.08c	pcf2	hip4	cac2	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.3909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525873	2541614	2541284	278111	277797	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC947.08c	elp3	hip4	kat9	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525874	2541608	2541284	278105	277797	SPAC2F3.16	SPBC947.08c	SPAC2F3.16	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525875	2543160	2541284	279591	277797	SPAC31A2.14	SPBC947.08c	bun107	hip4	wdr48	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525876	2543190	2541284	279619	277797	SPAC31F12.01	SPBC947.08c	zds1	hip4	SPAC637.14|mug88	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.2502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525877	2542592	2541284	279047	277797	SPAC328.01c	SPBC947.08c	msn5	hip4	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525878	2541710	2541284	278205	277797	SPAC343.11c	SPBC947.08c	msc1	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525879	2543044	2541284	279479	277797	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC947.08c	tip1	hip4	noc1	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525880	2543064	2541284	279497	277797	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC947.08c	hrp3	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525881	2543643	2541284	280057	277797	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC947.08c	hos2	hip4	hda1|phd1	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.6961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525882	2543616	2541284	280030	277797	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC947.08c	cwf21	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525883	2543529	2541284	279947	277797	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC947.08c	ryh1	hip4	hos1|sat7	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525884	2543667	2541284	280081	277797	SPAC4H3.02c	SPBC947.08c	swc3	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525885	2542571	2541284	279027	277797	SPAC589.02c	SPBC947.08c	med13	hip4	spTrap240|srb9	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525886	2541633	2541284	278129	277797	SPAC664.01c	SPBC947.08c	swi6	hip4	SPAC824.10c	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525887	2543563	2541284	279979	277797	SPAC664.02c	SPBC947.08c	arp8	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.6357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525888	2543240	2541284	279668	277797	SPAC694.06c	SPBC947.08c	mrc1	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525889	2543226	2541284	279654	277797	SPAC6B12.05c	SPBC947.08c	ies2	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.8877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525890	2542198	2541284	278673	277797	SPAC6F12.09	SPBC947.08c	rdp1	hip4	rdr1	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525891	2543513	2541284	279931	277797	SPAC821.06	SPBC947.08c	spn2	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525892	2542845	2541284	279291	277797	SPAC824.04	SPBC947.08c	SPAC824.04	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525893	2543567	2541284	279983	277797	SPAC890.03	SPBC947.08c	ppk16	hip4	mug92	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525894	2542102	2541284	278578	277797	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC947.08c	spc34	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525895	2543341	2541284	279764	277797	SPAC8E11.07c	SPBC947.08c	alp31	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525896	2543530	2541284	279948	277797	SPAC926.07c	SPBC947.08c	dlc2	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525897	2542021	2541284	278504	277797	SPAP14E8.02	SPBC947.08c	tos4	hip4	SPAP14E8.02	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525898	2543387	2541284	279809	277797	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC947.08c	mcl1	hip4	slr3	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525899	2543670	2541284	280084	277797	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC947.08c	eme1	hip4	mms4|slx2	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525900	2539668	2541284	276223	277797	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC947.08c	pht1	hip4	pi001	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525901	2539651	2541284	276206	277797	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC947.08c	srb11	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525902	2539667	2541284	276222	277797	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC947.08c	ash2	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.3953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525903	2539787	2541284	276337	277797	SPBC15C4.06c	SPBC947.08c	SPBC15C4.06c	hip4	SPBC21H7.01c	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525904	2539911	2541284	276456	277797	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC947.08c	amo1	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.8984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525905	2539960	2541284	276504	277797	SPBC15D4.15	SPBC947.08c	pho2	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525906	2539857	2541284	276404	277797	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC947.08c	tea2	hip4	klp4	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525907	2540154	2541284	276690	277797	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC947.08c	SPBC16C6.05	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525908	2539949	2541284	276493	277797	SPBC1703.04	SPBC947.08c	mlh1	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525909	2540077	2541284	276615	277797	SPBC17D11.04c	SPBC947.08c	nto1	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525910	2539714	2541284	276267	277797	SPBC1861.07	SPBC947.08c	SPBC1861.07	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525911	2540822	2541284	277340	277797	SPBC18E5.05c	SPBC947.08c	elp5	hip4	iki1	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525912	2540788	2541284	277307	277797	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC947.08c	swd2	hip4	swd2.1	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.4116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525913	2540837	2541284	277355	277797	SPBC18H10.08c	SPBC947.08c	ubp4	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525914	2540352	2541284	276881	277797	SPBC215.03c	SPBC947.08c	csn1	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525915	2540686	2541284	277211	277797	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC947.08c	bdc1	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525916	2540317	2541284	276847	277797	SPBC24C6.05	SPBC947.08c	sec28	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.2527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525917	2540498	2541284	277026	277797	SPBC27.02c	SPBC947.08c	ask1	hip4	mug181	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525918	2540497	2541284	277025	277797	SPBC27.04	SPBC947.08c	uds1	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525919	2540597	2541284	277123	277797	SPBC29A3.09c	SPBC947.08c	SPBC29A3.09c	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525920	2540353	2541284	276882	277797	SPBC2F12.12c	SPBC947.08c	cay1	hip4	SPBC2F12.12c	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525921	3361323	2541284	280399	277797	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC947.08c	swi3	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525922	2540322	2541284	276852	277797	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC947.08c	SPBC31F10.10c	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525923	2540396	2541284	276924	277797	SPBC31F10.12	SPBC947.08c	tma20	hip4	SPBC31F10.12	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525924	2540968	2541284	277484	277797	SPBC3H7.07c	SPBC947.08c	ser2	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.1112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525925	2540979	2541284	277495	277797	SPBC3H7.10	SPBC947.08c	elp6	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525926	2540749	2541284	277271	277797	SPBC4B4.03	SPBC947.08c	rsc1	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525927	2540913	2541284	277429	277797	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC947.08c	SPBC56F2.08c	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525928	2541220	2541284	277734	277797	SPBC8D2.04	SPBC947.08c	hht2	hip4	h3.2	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.2667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525929	2542418	2541251	278881	277765	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC947.10	dad2	dsc1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525930	2542522	2541251	278980	277765	SPAC19A8.03	SPBC947.10	ymr1	dsc1	SPAC19A8.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525931	2541871	2541251	278361	277765	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC947.10	res2	dsc1	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525932	2542571	2541251	279027	277765	SPAC589.02c	SPBC947.10	med13	dsc1	spTrap240|srb9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525933	2542055	2541251	278534	277765	SPAC6G9.03c	SPBC947.10	mug183	dsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525934	2542102	2541251	278578	277765	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC947.10	spc34	dsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525935	2543289	2541251	279714	277765	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC947.10	rad26	dsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525936	2539668	2541251	276223	277765	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC947.10	pht1	dsc1	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525937	2539651	2541251	276206	277765	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC947.10	srb11	dsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525938	2539812	2541251	276362	277765	SPBC1347.02	SPBC947.10	fkbp39	dsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525939	2540787	2541251	277306	277765	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC947.10	sgf29	dsc1	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525940	2540320	2541251	276850	277765	SPBC3D6.04c	SPBC947.10	mad1	dsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525941	2541147	2541251	277662	277765	SPBC651.05c	SPBC947.10	dot2	dsc1	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525942	2542239	2541287	278711	277800	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBP22H7.05c	chp1	abo2	-	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525943	2542519	2541287	278977	277800	SPAC19G12.08	SPBP22H7.05c	scs7	abo2	-	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525944	2540060	2541287	276598	277800	SPBC106.01	SPBP22H7.05c	mph1	abo2	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.5939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525945	2540825	2541287	277343	277800	SPBC428.08c	SPBP22H7.05c	clr4	abo2	-	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525946	2542363	2541292	278827	277804	SPAC1783.05	SPBP23A10.16	hrp1	sdh4	chd1	tim18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525947	2542277	2541292	278746	277804	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBP23A10.16	dbr1	sdh4	-	tim18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525948	2542421	2541292	278884	277804	SPAC17G8.05	SPBP23A10.16	med20	sdh4	-	tim18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525949	2542398	2541292	278862	277804	SPAC1805.03c	SPBP23A10.16	trm13	sdh4	-	tim18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525950	2542418	2541292	278881	277804	SPAC1805.07c	SPBP23A10.16	dad2	sdh4	hos2	tim18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525951	3361533	2541292	280609	277804	SPAC222.15	SPBP23A10.16	meu13	sdh4	SPAC821.01	tim18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525952	2542032	2541292	278514	277804	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBP23A10.16	pnk1	sdh4	-	tim18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525953	2542701	2541292	279154	277804	SPAC26H5.05	SPBP23A10.16	mga2	sdh4	SPAC26H5.05	tim18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525954	2543165	2541292	279596	277804	SPAC343.07	SPBP23A10.16	mug28	sdh4	-	tim18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525955	2541713	2541292	278208	277804	SPAC3A12.12	SPBP23A10.16	atp11	sdh4	-	tim18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525956	2543452	2541292	279872	277804	SPAC3G9.04	SPBP23A10.16	ssu72	sdh4	-	tim18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525957	2543529	2541292	279947	277804	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBP23A10.16	ryh1	sdh4	hos1|sat7	tim18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525958	2543423	2541292	279844	277804	SPAC4H3.07c	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC4H3.07c	sdh4	-	tim18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525959	2543580	2541292	279995	277804	SPAC644.14c	SPBP23A10.16	rad51	sdh4	rhp51	tim18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525960	2543387	2541292	279809	277804	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBP23A10.16	mcl1	sdh4	slr3	tim18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525961	2543419	2541292	279841	277804	SPAPB24D3.02c	SPBP23A10.16	SPAPB24D3.02c	sdh4	-	tim18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525962	2539930	2541292	276474	277804	SPBC1198.11c	SPBP23A10.16	reb1	sdh4	SPBC660.01c	tim18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.0341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525963	2539911	2541292	276456	277804	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBP23A10.16	amo1	sdh4	-	tim18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525964	2540209	2541292	276742	277804	SPBC1604.10	SPBP23A10.16	srb7	sdh4	med21	tim18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525965	2540221	2541292	276754	277804	SPBC32F12.02	SPBP23A10.16	rec14	sdh4	-	tim18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525966	2539911	2541330	276456	277842	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBP35G2.06c	amo1	nup131	-	Nup133a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525967	2541536	2541349	278036	277860	SPAC1071.02	SPBP35G2.08c	mms19	air1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.2692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525968	2541628	2541349	278124	277860	SPAC110.02	SPBP35G2.08c	pds5	air1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525969	3361456	2541349	280532	277860	SPAC1142.03c	SPBP35G2.08c	swi2	air1	SPAC17G6.20c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525970	2542318	2541349	278784	277860	SPAC16C9.05	SPBP35G2.08c	cph1	air1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525971	2542278	2541349	278747	277860	SPAC17G8.07	SPBP35G2.08c	yaf9	air1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525972	2542207	2541349	278682	277860	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBP35G2.08c	ddb1	air1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525973	2542519	2541349	278977	277860	SPAC19G12.08	SPBP35G2.08c	scs7	air1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525974	2542066	2541349	278543	277860	SPAC227.05	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC227.05	air1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.6121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525975	2541899	2541349	278389	277860	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBP35G2.08c	set3	air1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525976	2542032	2541349	278514	277860	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBP35G2.08c	pnk1	air1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-20.3358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525977	2541496	2541349	277998	277860	SPAC23D3.09	SPBP35G2.08c	arp42	air1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.0807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525978	2541776	2541349	278270	277860	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBP35G2.08c	swd1	air1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525979	2542081	2541349	278558	277860	SPAC26H5.04	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC26H5.04	air1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525980	2542701	2541349	279154	277860	SPAC26H5.05	SPBP35G2.08c	mga2	air1	SPAC26H5.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525981	2541889	2541349	278379	277860	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBP35G2.08c	pom1	air1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525982	2541801	2541349	278292	277860	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBP35G2.08c	snf5	air1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525983	2543190	2541349	279619	277860	SPAC31F12.01	SPBP35G2.08c	zds1	air1	SPAC637.14|mug88	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525984	2543106	2541349	279538	277860	SPAC3A11.13	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC3A11.13	air1	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.3298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525985	2541713	2541349	278208	277860	SPAC3A12.12	SPBP35G2.08c	atp11	air1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525986	2543044	2541349	279479	277860	SPAC3C7.12	SPBP35G2.08c	tip1	air1	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525987	2543643	2541349	280057	277860	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBP35G2.08c	hos2	air1	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525988	2543378	2541349	279800	277860	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBP35G2.08c	pac10	air1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.2507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525989	2543563	2541349	279979	277860	SPAC664.02c	SPBP35G2.08c	arp8	air1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.5151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525990	2543530	2541349	279948	277860	SPAC926.07c	SPBP35G2.08c	dlc2	air1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525991	2543372	2541349	279794	277860	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBP35G2.08c	ase1	air1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525992	2541470	2541349	277972	277860	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBP35G2.08c	rpb9	air1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525993	2540173	2541349	276706	277860	SPBC106.13	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC106.13	air1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525994	2539971	2541349	276515	277860	SPBC1105.04c	SPBP35G2.08c	cbp1	air1	abp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525995	2539668	2541349	276223	277860	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBP35G2.08c	pht1	air1	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525996	2539667	2541349	276222	277860	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBP35G2.08c	ash2	air1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525997	2539857	2541349	276404	277860	SPBC1604.20c	SPBP35G2.08c	tea2	air1	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525998	2540788	2541349	277307	277860	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBP35G2.08c	swd2	air1	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
525999	2540664	2541349	277189	277860	SPBC215.02	SPBP35G2.08c	bob1	air1	gim5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.9947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526000	2540352	2541349	276881	277860	SPBC215.03c	SPBP35G2.08c	csn1	air1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526001	2540686	2541349	277211	277860	SPBC21D10.10	SPBP35G2.08c	bdc1	air1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526002	2540492	2541349	277020	277860	SPBC2D10.13	SPBP35G2.08c	est1	air1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526003	2540322	2541349	276852	277860	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC31F10.10c	air1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526004	2540396	2541349	276924	277860	SPBC31F10.12	SPBP35G2.08c	tma20	air1	SPBC31F10.12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526005	2540968	2541349	277484	277860	SPBC3H7.07c	SPBP35G2.08c	ser2	air1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.2265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526006	2540825	2541349	277343	277860	SPBC428.08c	SPBP35G2.08c	clr4	air1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526007	2540749	2541349	277271	277860	SPBC4B4.03	SPBP35G2.08c	rsc1	air1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.7672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526008	2541088	2541349	277603	277860	SPBC609.05	SPBP35G2.08c	pob3	air1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526009	2541208	2541349	277722	277860	SPBC887.04c	SPBP35G2.08c	lub1	air1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526010	2540353	2541289	276882	277802	SPBC2F12.12c	SPBP35G2.09	cay1	usp103	SPBC2F12.12c	yhc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526011	2541208	2541289	277722	277802	SPBC887.04c	SPBP35G2.09	lub1	usp103	-	yhc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526012	2542757	2541336	279207	277847	SPAC13C5.07	SPBP35G2.10	mre11	mit1	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.5303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526013	2542007	2541336	278490	277847	SPAC20H4.07	SPBP35G2.10	rad57	mit1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526014	2543580	2541336	279995	277847	SPAC644.14c	SPBP35G2.10	rad51	mit1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526015	2540436	2541336	276964	277847	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBP35G2.10	ngg1	mit1	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526016	2543263	2541337	279691	277848	SPAC1002.15c	SPBP35G2.13c	med6	swc2	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526017	2541536	2541337	278036	277848	SPAC1071.02	SPBP35G2.13c	mms19	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.21	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526018	2542311	2541337	278777	277848	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBP35G2.13c	dad1	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526019	2542318	2541337	278784	277848	SPAC16C9.05	SPBP35G2.13c	cph1	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526020	2542421	2541337	278884	277848	SPAC17G8.05	SPBP35G2.13c	med20	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.5661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526021	2542418	2541337	278881	277848	SPAC1805.07c	SPBP35G2.13c	dad2	swc2	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.0934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526022	2541899	2541337	278389	277848	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBP35G2.13c	set3	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526023	2541496	2541337	277998	277848	SPAC23D3.09	SPBP35G2.13c	arp42	swc2	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526024	2541531	2541337	278031	277848	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP35G2.13c	fft3	swc2	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-18.7121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526025	2541672	2541337	278168	277848	SPAC2F3.15	SPBP35G2.13c	lsk1	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526026	2541889	2541337	278379	277848	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBP35G2.13c	pom1	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526027	2543452	2541337	279872	277848	SPAC3G9.04	SPBP35G2.13c	ssu72	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.48	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526028	2543643	2541337	280057	277848	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBP35G2.13c	hos2	swc2	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526029	2543443	2541337	279863	277848	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBP35G2.13c	snt2	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-21.5743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526030	2543426	2541337	279846	277848	SPAC631.02	SPBP35G2.13c	bdf2	swc2	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526031	2543563	2541337	279979	277848	SPAC664.02c	SPBP35G2.13c	arp8	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.8577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526032	2542845	2541337	279291	277848	SPAC824.04	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC824.04	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526033	2542102	2541337	278578	277848	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBP35G2.13c	spc34	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.6814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526034	2543387	2541337	279809	277848	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBP35G2.13c	mcl1	swc2	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526035	2539667	2541337	276222	277848	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBP35G2.13c	ash2	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.0245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526036	2539773	2541337	276324	277848	SPBC14F5.08	SPBP35G2.13c	med7	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.99	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526037	2539733	2541337	276285	277848	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBP35G2.13c	pab2	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526038	2539714	2541337	276267	277848	SPBC1861.07	SPBP35G2.13c	SPBC1861.07	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526039	2540498	2541337	277026	277848	SPBC27.02c	SPBP35G2.13c	ask1	swc2	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.3187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526040	2540354	2541337	276883	277848	SPBC29A3.13	SPBP35G2.13c	pdp1	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526041	2540353	2541337	276882	277848	SPBC2F12.12c	SPBP35G2.13c	cay1	swc2	SPBC2F12.12c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526042	2540967	2541337	277483	277848	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBP35G2.13c	SPBC36B7.08c	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.0931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526043	2540749	2541337	277271	277848	SPBC4B4.03	SPBP35G2.13c	rsc1	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.3737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526044	2541088	2541337	277603	277848	SPBC609.05	SPBP35G2.13c	pob3	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.7089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526045	2540064	2541358	276602	277869	SPBC1718.02	SPBP4H10.16c	hop1	SPBP4H10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526046	2540373	2541358	276902	277869	SPBC2G2.05	SPBP4H10.16c	rpl1603	SPBP4H10.16c	rpl16c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526047	2542349	2541371	278814	277882	SPAC1782.05	SPBP4H10.17c	ypa2	SPBP4H10.17c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	mrps2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526048	2543619	2541371	280033	277882	SPAC4F10.04	SPBP4H10.17c	ypa1	SPBP4H10.17c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	mrps2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526049	2543240	2541371	279668	277882	SPAC694.06c	SPBP4H10.17c	mrc1	SPBP4H10.17c	-	mrps2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526050	2540064	2541371	276602	277882	SPBC1718.02	SPBP4H10.17c	hop1	SPBP4H10.17c	-	mrps2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526051	2540317	2541371	276847	277882	SPBC24C6.05	SPBP4H10.17c	sec28	SPBP4H10.17c	-	mrps2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526052	2539843	2541370	276391	277881	SPBC16G5.11c	SPBP8B7.07c	bag101	set6	bag1|bag1-a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526053	2540353	2541370	276882	277881	SPBC2F12.12c	SPBP8B7.07c	cay1	set6	SPBC2F12.12c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526054	2542757	2541361	279207	277872	SPAC13C5.07	SPBP8B7.10c	mre11	utp16	rad32	SPBP8B7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526055	2542207	2541361	278682	277872	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBP8B7.10c	ddb1	utp16	-	SPBP8B7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526056	2542418	2541361	278881	277872	SPAC1805.07c	SPBP8B7.10c	dad2	utp16	hos2	SPBP8B7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526057	2542519	2541361	278977	277872	SPAC19G12.08	SPBP8B7.10c	scs7	utp16	-	SPBP8B7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526058	2543240	2541361	279668	277872	SPAC694.06c	SPBP8B7.10c	mrc1	utp16	-	SPBP8B7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526059	2542198	2541361	278673	277872	SPAC6F12.09	SPBP8B7.10c	rdp1	utp16	rdr1	SPBP8B7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526060	2543670	2541361	280084	277872	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBP8B7.10c	eme1	utp16	mms4|slx2	SPBP8B7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526061	2539651	2541361	276206	277872	SPBC12D12.06	SPBP8B7.10c	srb11	utp16	-	SPBP8B7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526062	2539911	2541361	276456	277872	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBP8B7.10c	amo1	utp16	-	SPBP8B7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526063	2540154	2541361	276690	277872	SPBC16C6.05	SPBP8B7.10c	SPBC16C6.05	utp16	-	SPBP8B7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526064	2540686	2541361	277211	277872	SPBC21D10.10	SPBP8B7.10c	bdc1	utp16	-	SPBP8B7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526065	2540498	2541361	277026	277872	SPBC27.02c	SPBP8B7.10c	ask1	utp16	mug181	SPBP8B7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526066	2540825	2541361	277343	277872	SPBC428.08c	SPBP8B7.10c	clr4	utp16	-	SPBP8B7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526067	2539847	2541361	276395	277872	SPBC530.14c	SPBP8B7.10c	dsk1	utp16	-	SPBP8B7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526068	3361323	2541373	280399	277884	SPBC30D10.04	SPBP8B7.18c	swi3	SPBP8B7.18c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526069	2542318	2541378	278784	277889	SPAC16C9.05	SPBP8B7.21	cph1	ubp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526070	2541496	2541378	277998	277889	SPAC23D3.09	SPBP8B7.21	arp42	ubp3	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526071	2542701	2541378	279154	277889	SPAC26H5.05	SPBP8B7.21	mga2	ubp3	SPAC26H5.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526072	2539726	2541378	276278	277889	SPBC13E7.08c	SPBP8B7.21	leo1	ubp3	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526073	2540115	2541378	276652	277889	SPBC1778.02	SPBP8B7.21	rap1	ubp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526074	2540788	2541378	277307	277889	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBP8B7.21	swd2	ubp3	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526075	2540353	2541378	276882	277889	SPBC2F12.12c	SPBP8B7.21	cay1	ubp3	SPBC2F12.12c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526076	2540221	2541378	276754	277889	SPBC32F12.02	SPBP8B7.21	rec14	ubp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526077	2540929	2541378	277445	277889	SPBC354.03	SPBP8B7.21	swd3	ubp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526078	2540919	2541378	277435	277889	SPBC543.07	SPBP8B7.21	pek1	ubp3	mkk1|skh1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526079	2541101	2541378	277616	277889	SPBC609.02	SPBP8B7.21	ptn1	ubp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526080	2541284	2541378	277797	277889	SPBC947.08c	SPBP8B7.21	hip4	ubp3	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526081	2541349	2541378	277860	277889	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBP8B7.21	air1	ubp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526082	2541536	2541365	278036	277876	SPAC1071.02	SPBP8B7.23	mms19	rnf10	-	SPBP8B7.23	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526083	2543384	2541365	279806	277876	SPAC637.06	SPBP8B7.23	gmh5	rnf10	SPAC637.06	SPBP8B7.23	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526084	2543240	2541365	279668	277876	SPAC694.06c	SPBP8B7.23	mrc1	rnf10	-	SPBP8B7.23	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526085	2540100	2541365	276638	277876	SPBC13E7.09	SPBP8B7.23	vrp1	rnf10	-	SPBP8B7.23	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526086	2539911	2541365	276456	277876	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBP8B7.23	amo1	rnf10	-	SPBP8B7.23	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526087	2541121	2541379	277636	277890	SPBC609.03	SPBP8B7.27	iqw1	mug30	iqwd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526088	2540115	2541375	276652	277886	SPBC1778.02	SPBP8B7.31	rap1	SPBP8B7.31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526089	3361323	2541375	280399	277886	SPBC30D10.04	SPBP8B7.31	swi3	SPBP8B7.31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526090	2543263	2538828	279691	275409	SPAC1002.15c	SPCC1020.05	med6	SPCC1020.05	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526091	2542418	2538828	278881	275409	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC1020.05	dad2	SPCC1020.05	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526092	2543452	2538828	279872	275409	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC1020.05	ssu72	SPCC1020.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526093	2539651	2538828	276206	275409	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC1020.05	srb11	SPCC1020.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526094	2540220	2538828	276753	275409	SPBC337.03	SPCC1020.05	rhn1	SPCC1020.05	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526095	2540893	2538828	277409	275409	SPBC543.10	SPCC1020.05	get1	SPCC1020.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526096	2542289	2539303	278757	275871	SPAC17G6.03	SPCC1020.09	SPAC17G6.03	gnr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526097	2542421	2539303	278884	275871	SPAC17G8.05	SPCC1020.09	med20	gnr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526098	2540893	2539303	277409	275871	SPBC543.10	SPCC1020.09	get1	gnr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526099	2542032	2539239	278514	275809	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC1020.10	pnk1	oca2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526100	2539668	2539239	276223	275809	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC1020.10	pht1	oca2	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526101	2539651	2539239	276206	275809	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC1020.10	srb11	oca2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526102	2540893	2539239	277409	275809	SPBC543.10	SPCC1020.10	get1	oca2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.2416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526103	2541292	2539239	277804	275809	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC1020.10	sdh4	oca2	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526104	2540353	2538710	276882	275294	SPBC2F12.12c	SPCC1020.12c	cay1	xap5	SPBC2F12.12c	SPCC14G10.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526105	2540893	2538710	277409	275294	SPBC543.10	SPCC1020.12c	get1	xap5	-	SPCC14G10.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526106	2540893	2538855	277409	275436	SPBC543.10	SPCC1183.06	get1	ung1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.0398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526107	2541580	2538987	278077	275561	SPAC1687.05	SPCC11E10.06c	pli1	elp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526108	2542318	2538987	278784	275561	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC11E10.06c	cph1	elp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526109	2542123	2538987	278599	275561	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC11E10.06c	mal3	elp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526110	2542466	2538987	278927	275561	SPAC19E9.01c	SPCC11E10.06c	nup40	elp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526111	2542519	2538987	278977	275561	SPAC19G12.08	SPCC11E10.06c	scs7	elp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.9323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526112	2541899	2538987	278389	275561	SPAC22E12.11c	SPCC11E10.06c	set3	elp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526113	2541867	2538987	278357	275561	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC11E10.06c	sck2	elp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526114	2541871	2538987	278361	275561	SPAC22F3.09c	SPCC11E10.06c	res2	elp4	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526115	2541496	2538987	277998	275561	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC11E10.06c	arp42	elp4	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.2432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526116	2543044	2538987	279479	275561	SPAC3C7.12	SPCC11E10.06c	tip1	elp4	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526117	2543516	2538987	279934	275561	SPAC4F10.11	SPCC11E10.06c	spn1	elp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526118	2543563	2538987	279979	275561	SPAC664.02c	SPCC11E10.06c	arp8	elp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526119	2543319	2538987	279743	275561	SPAC6B12.09	SPCC11E10.06c	trm10	elp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526120	2539920	2538987	276464	275561	SPBC119.08	SPCC11E10.06c	pmk1	elp4	spm1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526121	2539930	2538987	276474	275561	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC11E10.06c	reb1	elp4	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526122	2539668	2538987	276223	275561	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC11E10.06c	pht1	elp4	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526123	2540023	2538987	276567	275561	SPBC11C11.10	SPCC11E10.06c	SPBC11C11.10	elp4	SPBC3B8.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526124	2540008	2538987	276552	275561	SPBC12D12.02c	SPCC11E10.06c	cdm1	elp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526125	2539787	2538987	276337	275561	SPBC15C4.06c	SPCC11E10.06c	SPBC15C4.06c	elp4	SPBC21H7.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526126	2539733	2538987	276285	275561	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC11E10.06c	pab2	elp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526127	2539999	2538987	276543	275561	SPBC1734.15	SPCC11E10.06c	rsc4	elp4	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.5533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526128	2540686	2538987	277211	275561	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC11E10.06c	bdc1	elp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526129	2540354	2538987	276883	275561	SPBC29A3.13	SPCC11E10.06c	pdp1	elp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526130	2540825	2538987	277343	275561	SPBC428.08c	SPCC11E10.06c	clr4	elp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.6883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526131	2538710	2538987	275294	275561	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC11E10.06c	xap5	elp4	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526132	2541496	2539154	277998	275726	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC11E10.07c	arp42	SPCC11E10.07c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526133	2543670	2539154	280084	275726	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPCC11E10.07c	eme1	SPCC11E10.07c	mms4|slx2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526134	2540317	2539154	276847	275726	SPBC24C6.05	SPCC11E10.07c	sec28	SPCC11E10.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526135	2540220	2539154	276753	275726	SPBC337.03	SPCC11E10.07c	rhn1	SPCC11E10.07c	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526136	2541628	2539050	278124	275623	SPAC110.02	SPCC11E10.08	pds5	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.0054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526137	2540106	2539050	276643	275623	SPBC12D12.09	SPCC11E10.08	rev7	rik1	SPAC12D12.09	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526138	2542757	2539050	279207	275623	SPAC13C5.07	SPCC11E10.08	mre11	rik1	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.9079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526139	2541650	2539050	278146	275623	SPAC14C4.12c	SPCC11E10.08	laf1	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526140	2542788	2539050	279237	275623	SPAC15A10.15	SPCC11E10.08	sgo2	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.2989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526141	2542311	2539050	278777	275623	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC11E10.08	dad1	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526142	2542318	2539050	278784	275623	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC11E10.08	cph1	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.5143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526143	2542277	2539050	278746	275623	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC11E10.08	dbr1	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526144	2542207	2539050	278682	275623	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC11E10.08	ddb1	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526145	2542418	2539050	278881	275623	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC11E10.08	dad2	rik1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526146	2542123	2539050	278599	275623	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC11E10.08	mal3	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-19.0578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526147	2542568	2539050	279024	275623	SPAC1952.02	SPCC11E10.08	tma23	rik1	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526148	2542237	2539050	278709	275623	SPAC19E9.02	SPCC11E10.08	fin1	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526149	2542007	2539050	278490	275623	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC11E10.08	rad57	rik1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.8431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526150	2542032	2539050	278514	275623	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC11E10.08	pnk1	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526151	2541496	2539050	277998	275623	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC11E10.08	arp42	rik1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.6889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526152	2541856	2539050	278347	275623	SPAC23H3.08c	SPCC11E10.08	bub3	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526153	2541614	2539050	278111	275623	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC11E10.08	elp3	rik1	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.4402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526154	2541672	2539050	278168	275623	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC11E10.08	lsk1	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526155	2543044	2539050	279479	275623	SPAC3C7.12	SPCC11E10.08	tip1	rik1	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526156	2543118	2539050	279550	275623	SPAC3G6.11	SPCC11E10.08	chl1	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.4287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526157	2543619	2539050	280033	275623	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC11E10.08	ypa1	rik1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.0846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526158	2542571	2539050	279027	275623	SPAC589.02c	SPCC11E10.08	med13	rik1	spTrap240|srb9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526159	2543580	2539050	279995	275623	SPAC644.14c	SPCC11E10.08	rad51	rik1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.5994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526160	2543240	2539050	279668	275623	SPAC694.06c	SPCC11E10.08	mrc1	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.2104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526161	2543567	2539050	279983	275623	SPAC890.03	SPCC11E10.08	ppk16	rik1	mug92	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526162	2542102	2539050	278578	275623	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC11E10.08	spc34	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526163	2543341	2539050	279764	275623	SPAC8E11.07c	SPCC11E10.08	alp31	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.9268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526164	2543668	2539050	280082	275623	SPAC9.05	SPCC11E10.08	fml1	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526165	2543372	2539050	279794	275623	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC11E10.08	ase1	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.1721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526166	2543387	2539050	279809	275623	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC11E10.08	mcl1	rik1	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526167	2543670	2539050	280084	275623	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPCC11E10.08	eme1	rik1	mms4|slx2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526168	2540060	2539050	276598	275623	SPBC106.01	SPCC11E10.08	mph1	rik1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.2211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526169	2539668	2539050	276223	275623	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC11E10.08	pht1	rik1	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526170	2539812	2539050	276362	275623	SPBC1347.02	SPCC11E10.08	fkbp39	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526171	2539960	2539050	276504	275623	SPBC15D4.15	SPCC11E10.08	pho2	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526172	2539857	2539050	276404	275623	SPBC1604.20c	SPCC11E10.08	tea2	rik1	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526173	2540822	2539050	277340	275623	SPBC18E5.05c	SPCC11E10.08	elp5	rik1	iki1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.8849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526174	2540678	2539050	277203	275623	SPBC1A4.10c	SPCC11E10.08	pmc1	rik1	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526175	2540589	2539050	277115	275623	SPBC20F10.06	SPCC11E10.08	mad2	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526176	2540680	2539050	277205	275623	SPBC26H8.05c	SPCC11E10.08	pph3	rik1	SPBC26H8.05c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.9164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526177	2540498	2539050	277026	275623	SPBC27.02c	SPCC11E10.08	ask1	rik1	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526178	2540512	2539050	277040	275623	SPBC29A3.05	SPCC11E10.08	vps71	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526179	3361323	2539050	280399	275623	SPBC30D10.04	SPCC11E10.08	swi3	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526180	2540219	2539050	276752	275623	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC11E10.08	hip1	rik1	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526181	2541017	2539050	277532	275623	SPBC36.07	SPCC11E10.08	elp1	rik1	iki3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.8489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526182	2540968	2539050	277484	275623	SPBC3H7.07c	SPCC11E10.08	ser2	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.9751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526183	2540979	2539050	277495	275623	SPBC3H7.10	SPCC11E10.08	elp6	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.6939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526184	2541062	2539050	277577	275623	SPBC660.11	SPCC11E10.08	tcg1	rik1	mug187	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526185	2540821	2539050	277339	275623	SPBC800.03	SPCC11E10.08	clr3	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526186	2540936	2539050	277452	275623	SPBC800.05c	SPCC11E10.08	atb2	rik1	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.8011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526187	2541284	2539050	277797	275623	SPBC947.08c	SPCC11E10.08	hip4	rik1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526188	2541287	2539050	277800	275623	SPBP22H7.05c	SPCC11E10.08	abo2	rik1	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526189	2541349	2539050	277860	275623	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC11E10.08	air1	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526190	2541531	2539079	278031	275651	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1223.01	fft3	SPCC1223.01	snf2SR	SPCC285.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526191	2543064	2539079	279497	275651	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC1223.01	hrp3	SPCC1223.01	-	SPCC285.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526192	2543616	2539079	280030	275651	SPAC4A8.09c	SPCC1223.01	cwf21	SPCC1223.01	-	SPCC285.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526193	2539995	2539079	276539	275651	SPBC1105.09	SPCC1223.01	ubc15	SPCC1223.01	-	SPCC285.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526194	2540686	2539079	277211	275651	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC1223.01	bdc1	SPCC1223.01	-	SPCC285.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526195	2540317	2539079	276847	275651	SPBC24C6.05	SPCC1223.01	sec28	SPCC1223.01	-	SPCC285.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526196	2540498	2539079	277026	275651	SPBC27.02c	SPCC1223.01	ask1	SPCC1223.01	mug181	SPCC285.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526197	2540995	2539079	277511	275651	SPBC337.16	SPCC1223.01	cho1	SPCC1223.01	-	SPCC285.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526198	2542363	2539232	278827	275802	SPAC1783.05	SPCC1223.04c	hrp1	set11	chd1	mug76	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526199	2542278	2539232	278747	275802	SPAC17G8.07	SPCC1223.04c	yaf9	set11	-	mug76	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526200	2542126	2539232	278602	275802	SPAC1B3.05	SPCC1223.04c	not3	set11	-	mug76	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526201	2543426	2539232	279846	275802	SPAC631.02	SPCC1223.04c	bdf2	set11	SPAC631.02|nrc1	mug76	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526202	2539700	2539232	276253	275802	SPBC1685.15c	SPCC1223.04c	klp6	set11	SPBC649.01c|sot2	mug76	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.0863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526203	2540353	2539232	276882	275802	SPBC2F12.12c	SPCC1223.04c	cay1	set11	SPBC2F12.12c	mug76	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526204	2541776	2539104	278270	275676	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC1223.10c	swd1	eaf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526205	2540788	2539104	277307	275676	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC1223.10c	swd2	eaf1	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526206	2541536	2539252	278036	275822	SPAC1071.02	SPCC1223.11	mms19	ptc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526207	5802929	2539252	858067	275822	SPAC1556.08c	SPCC1223.11	cbs2	ptc2	SPAC1F12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526208	2542809	2539252	279257	275822	SPAC15A10.11	SPCC1223.11	ubr11	ptc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526209	2542363	2539252	278827	275822	SPAC1783.05	SPCC1223.11	hrp1	ptc2	chd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526210	2542023	2539252	278506	275822	SPAC20H4.10	SPCC1223.11	ufd2	ptc2	SPAC145.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526211	2541871	2539252	278361	275822	SPAC22F3.09c	SPCC1223.11	res2	ptc2	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526212	2542032	2539252	278514	275822	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC1223.11	pnk1	ptc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526213	2541496	2539252	277998	275822	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC1223.11	arp42	ptc2	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526214	2541845	2539252	278336	275822	SPAC23G3.08c	SPCC1223.11	ubp7	ptc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526215	2541578	2539252	278075	275822	SPAC25B8.05	SPCC1223.11	deg1	ptc2	SPAC25B8.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526216	2541614	2539252	278111	275822	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC1223.11	elp3	ptc2	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526217	2542094	2539252	278571	275822	SPAC29B12.06c	SPCC1223.11	rcd1	ptc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.1466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526218	2542516	2539252	278974	275822	SPAC2F7.04	SPCC1223.11	pmc2	ptc2	med1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526219	2541801	2539252	278292	275822	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC1223.11	snf5	ptc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526220	2543160	2539252	279591	275822	SPAC31A2.14	SPCC1223.11	bun107	ptc2	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526221	2541713	2539252	278208	275822	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC1223.11	atp11	ptc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526222	2542571	2539252	279027	275822	SPAC589.02c	SPCC1223.11	med13	ptc2	spTrap240|srb9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526223	2541470	2539252	277972	275822	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPCC1223.11	rpb9	ptc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526224	2539930	2539252	276474	275822	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC1223.11	reb1	ptc2	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.5889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526225	2539651	2539252	276206	275822	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC1223.11	srb11	ptc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526226	2539667	2539252	276222	275822	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC1223.11	ash2	ptc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526227	2539911	2539252	276456	275822	SPBC15D4.10c	SPCC1223.11	amo1	ptc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526228	2540788	2539252	277307	275822	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC1223.11	swd2	ptc2	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526229	2540686	2539252	277211	275822	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC1223.11	bdc1	ptc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526230	2540317	2539252	276847	275822	SPBC24C6.05	SPCC1223.11	sec28	ptc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.5936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526231	2541017	2539252	277532	275822	SPBC36.07	SPCC1223.11	elp1	ptc2	iki3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526232	2540320	2539252	276850	275822	SPBC3D6.04c	SPCC1223.11	mad1	ptc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526233	2540968	2539252	277484	275822	SPBC3H7.07c	SPCC1223.11	ser2	ptc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.6197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526234	2540979	2539252	277495	275822	SPBC3H7.10	SPCC1223.11	elp6	ptc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526235	2540825	2539252	277343	275822	SPBC428.08c	SPCC1223.11	clr4	ptc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526236	2540821	2539252	277339	275822	SPBC800.03	SPCC1223.11	clr3	ptc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526237	2542421	2539045	278884	275618	SPAC17G8.05	SPCC1235.05c	med20	fft2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526238	2542519	2539045	278977	275618	SPAC19G12.08	SPCC1235.05c	scs7	fft2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.2793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526239	2541531	2539045	278031	275618	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1235.05c	fft3	fft2	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-21.417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526240	2543529	2539045	279947	275618	SPAC4C5.02c	SPCC1235.05c	ryh1	fft2	hos1|sat7	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526241	2540787	2539045	277306	275618	SPBC1921.07c	SPCC1235.05c	sgf29	fft2	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526242	2540436	2539045	276964	275618	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC1235.05c	ngg1	fft2	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526243	2540320	2539045	276850	275618	SPBC3D6.04c	SPCC1235.05c	mad1	fft2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526244	2543263	2538701	279691	275286	SPAC1002.15c	SPCC1235.09	med6	hif2	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526245	2541536	2538701	278036	275286	SPAC1071.02	SPCC1235.09	mms19	hif2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526246	3361561	2538701	280637	275286	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC1235.09	swr1	hif2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.0764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526247	2542311	2538701	278777	275286	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC1235.09	dad1	hif2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526248	2542277	2538701	278746	275286	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC1235.09	dbr1	hif2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.2833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526249	2542168	2538701	278643	275286	SPAC17A5.16	SPCC1235.09	ftp105	hif2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526250	2542421	2538701	278884	275286	SPAC17G8.05	SPCC1235.09	med20	hif2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526251	2542278	2538701	278747	275286	SPAC17G8.07	SPCC1235.09	yaf9	hif2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.9196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526252	2542418	2538701	278881	275286	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC1235.09	dad2	hif2	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526253	2541941	2538701	278428	275286	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC1235.09	tfs1	hif2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526254	2542032	2538701	278514	275286	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC1235.09	pnk1	hif2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526255	2541776	2538701	278270	275286	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC1235.09	swd1	hif2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526256	2541789	2538701	278281	275286	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC1235.09	iwr1	hif2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526257	2541531	2538701	278031	275286	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1235.09	fft3	hif2	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.5631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526258	2541614	2538701	278111	275286	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC1235.09	elp3	hif2	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526259	2542592	2538701	279047	275286	SPAC328.01c	SPCC1235.09	msn5	hif2	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526260	2541710	2538701	278205	275286	SPAC343.11c	SPCC1235.09	msc1	hif2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526261	2543452	2538701	279872	275286	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC1235.09	ssu72	hif2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526262	2543443	2538701	279863	275286	SPAC3H1.12c	SPCC1235.09	snt2	hif2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.8516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526263	2543619	2538701	280033	275286	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC1235.09	ypa1	hif2	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526264	2543426	2538701	279846	275286	SPAC631.02	SPCC1235.09	bdf2	hif2	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.7983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526265	2543563	2538701	279979	275286	SPAC664.02c	SPCC1235.09	arp8	hif2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-21.1621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526266	2542845	2538701	279291	275286	SPAC824.04	SPCC1235.09	SPAC824.04	hif2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.1316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526267	2539930	2538701	276474	275286	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC1235.09	reb1	hif2	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526268	2539668	2538701	276223	275286	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC1235.09	pht1	hif2	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526269	2539667	2538701	276222	275286	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC1235.09	ash2	hif2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.7136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526270	2540154	2538701	276690	275286	SPBC16C6.05	SPCC1235.09	SPBC16C6.05	hif2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526271	2539953	2538701	276497	275286	SPBC1709.11c	SPCC1235.09	png2	hif2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.5989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526272	2540077	2538701	276615	275286	SPBC17D11.04c	SPCC1235.09	nto1	hif2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526273	2540686	2538701	277211	275286	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC1235.09	bdc1	hif2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526274	2540317	2538701	276847	275286	SPBC24C6.05	SPCC1235.09	sec28	hif2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.0325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526275	2540498	2538701	277026	275286	SPBC27.02c	SPCC1235.09	ask1	hif2	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.9104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526276	2540512	2538701	277040	275286	SPBC29A3.05	SPCC1235.09	vps71	hif2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526277	2540353	2538701	276882	275286	SPBC2F12.12c	SPCC1235.09	cay1	hif2	SPBC2F12.12c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.1223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526278	2541017	2538701	277532	275286	SPBC36.07	SPCC1235.09	elp1	hif2	iki3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526279	2540967	2538701	277483	275286	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC1235.09	SPBC36B7.08c	hif2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526280	2540320	2538701	276850	275286	SPBC3D6.04c	SPCC1235.09	mad1	hif2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526281	2540979	2538701	277495	275286	SPBC3H7.10	SPCC1235.09	elp6	hif2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526282	2540749	2538701	277271	275286	SPBC4B4.03	SPCC1235.09	rsc1	hif2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526283	2539847	2538701	276395	275286	SPBC530.14c	SPCC1235.09	dsk1	hif2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526284	2540821	2538701	277339	275286	SPBC800.03	SPCC1235.09	clr3	hif2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526285	2541337	2538701	277848	275286	SPBP35G2.13c	SPCC1235.09	swc2	hif2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526286	2538987	2538701	275561	275286	SPCC11E10.06c	SPCC1235.09	elp4	hif2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526287	2543263	2538906	279691	275483	SPAC1002.15c	SPCC1259.03	med6	rpa12	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.6209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526288	2542757	2538906	279207	275483	SPAC13C5.07	SPCC1259.03	mre11	rpa12	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526289	2541580	2538906	278077	275483	SPAC1687.05	SPCC1259.03	pli1	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526290	2542311	2538906	278777	275483	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC1259.03	dad1	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526291	2542318	2538906	278784	275483	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC1259.03	cph1	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526292	2542349	2538906	278814	275483	SPAC1782.05	SPCC1259.03	ypa2	rpa12	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526293	2542277	2538906	278746	275483	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC1259.03	dbr1	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.99	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526294	2542421	2538906	278884	275483	SPAC17G8.05	SPCC1259.03	med20	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.9101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526295	2542278	2538906	278747	275483	SPAC17G8.07	SPCC1259.03	yaf9	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526296	2542207	2538906	278682	275483	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC1259.03	ddb1	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.2805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526297	2542418	2538906	278881	275483	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC1259.03	dad2	rpa12	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.5999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526298	2542123	2538906	278599	275483	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC1259.03	mal3	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526299	2542513	2538906	278971	275483	SPAC1952.05	SPCC1259.03	gcn5	rpa12	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526300	2542237	2538906	278709	275483	SPAC19E9.02	SPCC1259.03	fin1	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526301	2542519	2538906	278977	275483	SPAC19G12.08	SPCC1259.03	scs7	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.5035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526302	2542126	2538906	278602	275483	SPAC1B3.05	SPCC1259.03	not3	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.8662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526303	2542007	2538906	278490	275483	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC1259.03	rad57	rpa12	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526304	2541786	2538906	278278	275483	SPAC22F3.08c	SPCC1259.03	rok1	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526305	2541496	2538906	277998	275483	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC1259.03	arp42	rpa12	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.9976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526306	2541776	2538906	278270	275483	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC1259.03	swd1	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526307	2541531	2538906	278031	275483	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1259.03	fft3	rpa12	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526308	2542592	2538906	279047	275483	SPAC328.01c	SPCC1259.03	msn5	rpa12	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526309	2543044	2538906	279479	275483	SPAC3C7.12	SPCC1259.03	tip1	rpa12	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526310	2543064	2538906	279497	275483	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC1259.03	hrp3	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526311	2543452	2538906	279872	275483	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC1259.03	ssu72	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526312	2543443	2538906	279863	275483	SPAC3H1.12c	SPCC1259.03	snt2	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526313	2543426	2538906	279846	275483	SPAC631.02	SPCC1259.03	bdf2	rpa12	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526314	2543580	2538906	279995	275483	SPAC644.14c	SPCC1259.03	rad51	rpa12	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526315	2541633	2538906	278129	275483	SPAC664.01c	SPCC1259.03	swi6	rpa12	SPAC824.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526316	2543563	2538906	279979	275483	SPAC664.02c	SPCC1259.03	arp8	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.6427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526317	2543240	2538906	279668	275483	SPAC694.06c	SPCC1259.03	mrc1	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526318	2543226	2538906	279654	275483	SPAC6B12.05c	SPCC1259.03	ies2	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526319	2541819	2538906	278310	275483	SPAC6G9.08	SPCC1259.03	ubp6	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526320	2542845	2538906	279291	275483	SPAC824.04	SPCC1259.03	SPAC824.04	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526321	2542102	2538906	278578	275483	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC1259.03	spc34	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.5747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526322	2542021	2538906	278504	275483	SPAP14E8.02	SPCC1259.03	tos4	rpa12	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526323	2543372	2538906	279794	275483	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC1259.03	ase1	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-18.8803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526324	2543670	2538906	280084	275483	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPCC1259.03	eme1	rpa12	mms4|slx2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526325	2543463	2538906	279883	275483	SPAPB21F2.03	SPCC1259.03	slx9	rpa12	SPAPB21F2.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526326	2539930	2538906	276474	275483	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC1259.03	reb1	rpa12	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526327	2539668	2538906	276223	275483	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC1259.03	pht1	rpa12	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526328	2539651	2538906	276206	275483	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC1259.03	srb11	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526329	2539667	2538906	276222	275483	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC1259.03	ash2	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526330	2539787	2538906	276337	275483	SPBC15C4.06c	SPCC1259.03	SPBC15C4.06c	rpa12	SPBC21H7.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526331	2539911	2538906	276456	275483	SPBC15D4.10c	SPCC1259.03	amo1	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.8791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526332	2539857	2538906	276404	275483	SPBC1604.20c	SPCC1259.03	tea2	rpa12	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526333	2539700	2538906	276253	275483	SPBC1685.15c	SPCC1259.03	klp6	rpa12	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526334	2539733	2538906	276285	275483	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC1259.03	pab2	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.2049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526335	2539925	2538906	276469	275483	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC1259.03	SPBC16H5.13	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526336	2539999	2538906	276543	275483	SPBC1734.15	SPCC1259.03	rsc4	rpa12	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526337	2540788	2538906	277307	275483	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC1259.03	swd2	rpa12	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526338	2540787	2538906	277306	275483	SPBC1921.07c	SPCC1259.03	sgf29	rpa12	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526339	2540352	2538906	276881	275483	SPBC215.03c	SPCC1259.03	csn1	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.8361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526340	2540686	2538906	277211	275483	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC1259.03	bdc1	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526341	2540680	2538906	277205	275483	SPBC26H8.05c	SPCC1259.03	pph3	rpa12	SPBC26H8.05c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526342	2540498	2538906	277026	275483	SPBC27.02c	SPCC1259.03	ask1	rpa12	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.2761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526343	2540436	2538906	276964	275483	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC1259.03	ngg1	rpa12	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.8935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526344	2540492	2538906	277020	275483	SPBC2D10.13	SPCC1259.03	est1	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526345	2540353	2538906	276882	275483	SPBC2F12.12c	SPCC1259.03	cay1	rpa12	SPBC2F12.12c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.7716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526346	3361323	2538906	280399	275483	SPBC30D10.04	SPCC1259.03	swi3	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526347	2540322	2538906	276852	275483	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC1259.03	SPBC31F10.10c	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.5926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526348	2540219	2538906	276752	275483	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC1259.03	hip1	rpa12	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526349	2540221	2538906	276754	275483	SPBC32F12.02	SPCC1259.03	rec14	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526350	2540995	2538906	277511	275483	SPBC337.16	SPCC1259.03	cho1	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526351	2540929	2538906	277445	275483	SPBC354.03	SPCC1259.03	swd3	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526352	2540967	2538906	277483	275483	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC1259.03	SPBC36B7.08c	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.6717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526353	2540825	2538906	277343	275483	SPBC428.08c	SPCC1259.03	clr4	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.8444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526354	2541101	2538906	277616	275483	SPBC609.02	SPCC1259.03	ptn1	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526355	2541088	2538906	277603	275483	SPBC609.05	SPCC1259.03	pob3	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526356	2540821	2538906	277339	275483	SPBC800.03	SPCC1259.03	clr3	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526357	2541208	2538906	277722	275483	SPBC887.04c	SPCC1259.03	lub1	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526358	2541284	2538906	277797	275483	SPBC947.08c	SPCC1259.03	hip4	rpa12	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526359	2538701	2538906	275286	275483	SPCC1235.09	SPCC1259.03	hif2	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526360	2542757	2539081	279207	275653	SPAC13C5.07	SPCC1259.09c	mre11	pdx1	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526361	2539911	2539081	276456	275653	SPBC15D4.10c	SPCC1259.09c	amo1	pdx1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.2625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526362	2542349	2539082	278814	275654	SPAC1782.05	SPCC126.03	ypa2	pus1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	lps1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526363	2542032	2539082	278514	275654	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC126.03	pnk1	pus1	-	lps1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526364	2543384	2539082	279806	275654	SPAC637.06	SPCC126.03	gmh5	pus1	SPAC637.06	lps1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526365	2540787	2539082	277306	275654	SPBC1921.07c	SPCC126.03	sgf29	pus1	SPBC21D10.13	lps1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526366	2540317	2539082	276847	275654	SPBC24C6.05	SPCC126.03	sec28	pus1	-	lps1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526367	2540320	2539082	276850	275654	SPBC3D6.04c	SPCC126.03	mad1	pus1	-	lps1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526368	2542757	2539058	279207	275631	SPAC13C5.07	SPCC126.07c	mre11	pbr1	rad32	SPCC126.07c|asr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.74	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526369	2541496	2539066	277998	275638	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC126.13c	arp42	SPCC126.13c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526370	2539925	2539066	276469	275638	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC126.13c	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC126.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526371	2540893	2539066	277409	275638	SPBC543.10	SPCC126.13c	get1	SPCC126.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526372	2542421	2538868	278884	275448	SPAC17G8.05	SPCC132.02	med20	hst2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526373	2542519	2538868	278977	275448	SPAC19G12.08	SPCC132.02	scs7	hst2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526374	2543580	2538868	279995	275448	SPAC644.14c	SPCC132.02	rad51	hst2	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526375	2543670	2538868	280084	275448	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPCC132.02	eme1	hst2	mms4|slx2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526376	2539667	2538868	276222	275448	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC132.02	ash2	hst2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526377	2540353	2538868	276882	275448	SPBC2F12.12c	SPCC132.02	cay1	hst2	SPBC2F12.12c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526378	2540995	2538868	277511	275448	SPBC337.16	SPCC132.02	cho1	hst2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526379	2540735	2538868	277258	275448	SPBC83.03c	SPCC132.02	tas3	hst2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526380	2542418	2538800	278881	275381	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC1322.06	dad2	kap113	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526381	2542701	2538800	279154	275381	SPAC26H5.05	SPCC1322.06	mga2	kap113	SPAC26H5.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.7998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526382	2542102	2538800	278578	275381	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC1322.06	spc34	kap113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526383	2543372	2538800	279794	275381	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC1322.06	ase1	kap113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.9801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526384	2540498	2538800	277026	275381	SPBC27.02c	SPCC1322.06	ask1	kap113	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.0944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526385	2540320	2538800	276850	275381	SPBC3D6.04c	SPCC1322.06	mad1	kap113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526386	2541672	2538890	278168	275468	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC1393.02c	lsk1	spt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526387	2540219	2538890	276752	275468	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC1393.02c	hip1	spt2	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.6021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526388	2540893	2538890	277409	275468	SPBC543.10	SPCC1393.02c	get1	spt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526389	2541284	2538890	277797	275468	SPBC947.08c	SPCC1393.02c	hip4	spt2	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526390	2541628	2538690	278124	275275	SPAC110.02	SPCC1393.05	pds5	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526391	2542277	2538690	278746	275275	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC1393.05	dbr1	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526392	2542123	2538690	278599	275275	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC1393.05	mal3	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526393	2542568	2538690	279024	275275	SPAC1952.02	SPCC1393.05	tma23	ers1	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526394	2542237	2538690	278709	275275	SPAC19E9.02	SPCC1393.05	fin1	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526395	2542023	2538690	278506	275275	SPAC20H4.10	SPCC1393.05	ufd2	ers1	SPAC145.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526396	2542066	2538690	278543	275275	SPAC227.05	SPCC1393.05	SPAC227.05	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526397	2541531	2538690	278031	275275	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1393.05	fft3	ers1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526398	2543118	2538690	279550	275275	SPAC3G6.11	SPCC1393.05	chl1	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526399	2543529	2538690	279947	275275	SPAC4C5.02c	SPCC1393.05	ryh1	ers1	hos1|sat7	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526400	2543384	2538690	279806	275275	SPAC637.06	SPCC1393.05	gmh5	ers1	SPAC637.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526401	2543563	2538690	279979	275275	SPAC664.02c	SPCC1393.05	arp8	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526402	2543240	2538690	279668	275275	SPAC694.06c	SPCC1393.05	mrc1	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526403	2542845	2538690	279291	275275	SPAC824.04	SPCC1393.05	SPAC824.04	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526404	2543341	2538690	279764	275275	SPAC8E11.07c	SPCC1393.05	alp31	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526405	2543372	2538690	279794	275275	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC1393.05	ase1	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526406	2543387	2538690	279809	275275	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC1393.05	mcl1	ers1	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.2121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526407	2540060	2538690	276598	275275	SPBC106.01	SPCC1393.05	mph1	ers1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526408	2539971	2538690	276515	275275	SPBC1105.04c	SPCC1393.05	cbp1	ers1	abp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526409	2539812	2538690	276362	275275	SPBC1347.02	SPCC1393.05	fkbp39	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526410	2540822	2538690	277340	275275	SPBC18E5.05c	SPCC1393.05	elp5	ers1	iki1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526411	2540680	2538690	277205	275275	SPBC26H8.05c	SPCC1393.05	pph3	ers1	SPBC26H8.05c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526412	2540512	2538690	277040	275275	SPBC29A3.05	SPCC1393.05	vps71	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526413	2540597	2538690	277123	275275	SPBC29A3.09c	SPCC1393.05	SPBC29A3.09c	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526414	2540354	2538690	276883	275275	SPBC29A3.13	SPCC1393.05	pdp1	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526415	2540353	2538690	276882	275275	SPBC2F12.12c	SPCC1393.05	cay1	ers1	SPBC2F12.12c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526416	2540219	2538690	276752	275275	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC1393.05	hip1	ers1	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526417	2540320	2538690	276850	275275	SPBC3D6.04c	SPCC1393.05	mad1	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526418	2540893	2538690	277409	275275	SPBC543.10	SPCC1393.05	get1	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526419	2540913	2538690	277429	275275	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC1393.05	SPBC56F2.08c	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526420	2541088	2538690	277603	275275	SPBC609.05	SPCC1393.05	pob3	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526421	2540821	2538690	277339	275275	SPBC800.03	SPCC1393.05	clr3	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526422	2541284	2538690	277797	275275	SPBC947.08c	SPCC1393.05	hip4	ers1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.2702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526423	2541287	2538690	277800	275275	SPBP22H7.05c	SPCC1393.05	abo2	ers1	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526424	2541361	2538690	277872	275275	SPBP8B7.10c	SPCC1393.05	utp16	ers1	SPBP8B7.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526425	2538868	2538690	275448	275275	SPCC132.02	SPCC1393.05	hst2	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526426	2542135	2538955	278611	275529	SPAC13A11.04c	SPCC1450.02	ubp8	bdf1	-	SPCC191.13|brf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526427	2542318	2538955	278784	275529	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC1450.02	cph1	bdf1	-	SPCC191.13|brf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.0538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526428	2542363	2538955	278827	275529	SPAC1783.05	SPCC1450.02	hrp1	bdf1	chd1	SPCC191.13|brf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526429	2542278	2538955	278747	275529	SPAC17G8.07	SPCC1450.02	yaf9	bdf1	-	SPCC191.13|brf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.1743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526430	2542418	2538955	278881	275529	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC1450.02	dad2	bdf1	hos2	SPCC191.13|brf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526431	2542462	2538955	278923	275529	SPAC19B12.11c	SPCC1450.02	SPAC19B12.11c	bdf1	-	SPCC191.13|brf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526432	2542032	2538955	278514	275529	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC1450.02	pnk1	bdf1	-	SPCC191.13|brf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526433	2541496	2538955	277998	275529	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC1450.02	arp42	bdf1	arp4	SPCC191.13|brf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526434	2541531	2538955	278031	275529	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1450.02	fft3	bdf1	snf2SR	SPCC191.13|brf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526435	2543426	2538955	279846	275529	SPAC631.02	SPCC1450.02	bdf2	bdf1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	SPCC191.13|brf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.1238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526436	2542102	2538955	278578	275529	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC1450.02	spc34	bdf1	-	SPCC191.13|brf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526437	2543341	2538955	279764	275529	SPAC8E11.07c	SPCC1450.02	alp31	bdf1	-	SPCC191.13|brf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526438	2539971	2538955	276515	275529	SPBC1105.04c	SPCC1450.02	cbp1	bdf1	abp1	SPCC191.13|brf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526439	2539812	2538955	276362	275529	SPBC1347.02	SPCC1450.02	fkbp39	bdf1	-	SPCC191.13|brf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526440	2539925	2538955	276469	275529	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC1450.02	SPBC16H5.13	bdf1	-	SPCC191.13|brf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526441	2540498	2538955	277026	275529	SPBC27.02c	SPCC1450.02	ask1	bdf1	mug181	SPCC191.13|brf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526442	2540436	2538955	276964	275529	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC1450.02	ngg1	bdf1	ada3|kap1	SPCC191.13|brf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526443	2540353	2538955	276882	275529	SPBC2F12.12c	SPCC1450.02	cay1	bdf1	SPBC2F12.12c	SPCC191.13|brf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526444	2540322	2538955	276852	275529	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC1450.02	SPBC31F10.10c	bdf1	-	SPCC191.13|brf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526445	2540219	2538955	276752	275529	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC1450.02	hip1	bdf1	hir1	SPCC191.13|brf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.2028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526446	2540995	2538955	277511	275529	SPBC337.16	SPCC1450.02	cho1	bdf1	-	SPCC191.13|brf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526447	2540968	2538955	277484	275529	SPBC3H7.07c	SPCC1450.02	ser2	bdf1	-	SPCC191.13|brf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526448	2541088	2538955	277603	275529	SPBC609.05	SPCC1450.02	pob3	bdf1	-	SPCC191.13|brf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.3834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526449	2541175	2538955	277689	275529	SPBC839.13c	SPCC1450.02	rpl1601	bdf1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPCC191.13|brf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526450	2541284	2538955	277797	275529	SPBC947.08c	SPCC1450.02	hip4	bdf1	hpc2	SPCC191.13|brf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.6071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526451	2542421	2539249	278884	275819	SPAC17G8.05	SPCC1450.05c	med20	rox3	-	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526452	2542032	2539249	278514	275819	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC1450.05c	pnk1	rox3	-	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.96	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526453	2542516	2539249	278974	275819	SPAC2F7.04	SPCC1450.05c	pmc2	rox3	med1	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526454	2543426	2539249	279846	275819	SPAC631.02	SPCC1450.05c	bdf2	rox3	SPAC631.02|nrc1	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526455	2539971	2539249	276515	275819	SPBC1105.04c	SPCC1450.05c	cbp1	rox3	abp1	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526456	2539667	2539249	276222	275819	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC1450.05c	ash2	rox3	-	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.5722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526457	2539773	2539249	276324	275819	SPBC14F5.08	SPCC1450.05c	med7	rox3	-	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526458	2539911	2539249	276456	275819	SPBC15D4.10c	SPCC1450.05c	amo1	rox3	-	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526459	2540209	2539249	276742	275819	SPBC1604.10	SPCC1450.05c	srb7	rox3	med21	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526460	2540968	2539249	277484	275819	SPBC3H7.07c	SPCC1450.05c	ser2	rox3	-	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526461	2540913	2539249	277429	275819	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC1450.05c	SPBC56F2.08c	rox3	-	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526462	2543529	2539208	279947	275778	SPAC4C5.02c	SPCC1450.11c	ryh1	cek1	hos1|sat7	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526463	2543263	2538946	279691	275520	SPAC1002.15c	SPCC162.11c	med6	SPCC162.11c	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526464	2541642	2538946	278138	275520	SPAC10F6.05c	SPCC162.11c	ubc6	SPCC162.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526465	2541628	2538946	278124	275520	SPAC110.02	SPCC162.11c	pds5	SPCC162.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526466	2542421	2538946	278884	275520	SPAC17G8.05	SPCC162.11c	med20	SPCC162.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526467	2542126	2538946	278602	275520	SPAC1B3.05	SPCC162.11c	not3	SPCC162.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526468	2541941	2538946	278428	275520	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC162.11c	tfs1	SPCC162.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526469	2541776	2538946	278270	275520	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC162.11c	swd1	SPCC162.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526470	2543044	2538946	279479	275520	SPAC3C7.12	SPCC162.11c	tip1	SPCC162.11c	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526471	2543619	2538946	280033	275520	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC162.11c	ypa1	SPCC162.11c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.5114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526472	2539726	2538946	276278	275520	SPBC13E7.08c	SPCC162.11c	leo1	SPCC162.11c	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526473	2540788	2538946	277307	275520	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC162.11c	swd2	SPCC162.11c	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526474	2540787	2538946	277306	275520	SPBC1921.07c	SPCC162.11c	sgf29	SPCC162.11c	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526475	2540337	2538946	276866	275520	SPBC28F2.11	SPCC162.11c	hmo1	SPCC162.11c	SPBC28F2.11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526476	2540929	2538946	277445	275520	SPBC354.03	SPCC162.11c	swd3	SPCC162.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526477	2540967	2538946	277483	275520	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC162.11c	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC162.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526478	2540825	2538946	277343	275520	SPBC428.08c	SPCC162.11c	clr4	SPCC162.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526479	2541147	2538946	277662	275520	SPBC651.05c	SPCC162.11c	dot2	SPCC162.11c	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526480	2540893	2539236	277409	275806	SPBC543.10	SPCC1672.08c	get1	tfa2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.2044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526481	2541536	2539366	278036	275932	SPAC1071.02	SPCC16C4.11	mms19	pef1	-	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526482	2542111	2539366	278587	275932	SPAC1687.14c	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC1687.14c	pef1	-	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526483	2542349	2539366	278814	275932	SPAC1782.05	SPCC16C4.11	ypa2	pef1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526484	2542277	2539366	278746	275932	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC16C4.11	dbr1	pef1	-	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.0925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526485	2542141	2539366	278617	275932	SPAC17C9.05c	SPCC16C4.11	pmc3	pef1	med27|prk1	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526486	2542278	2539366	278747	275932	SPAC17G8.07	SPCC16C4.11	yaf9	pef1	-	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.2447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526487	2542195	2539366	278670	275932	SPAC1834.07	SPCC16C4.11	klp3	pef1	krp1	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526488	2541941	2539366	278428	275932	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC16C4.11	tfs1	pef1	-	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.9255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526489	2542023	2539366	278506	275932	SPAC20H4.10	SPCC16C4.11	ufd2	pef1	SPAC145.04	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526490	2541899	2539366	278389	275932	SPAC22E12.11c	SPCC16C4.11	set3	pef1	-	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.3151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526491	2541845	2539366	278336	275932	SPAC23G3.08c	SPCC16C4.11	ubp7	pef1	-	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526492	2541789	2539366	278281	275932	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC16C4.11	iwr1	pef1	-	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.5434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526493	2541614	2539366	278111	275932	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC16C4.11	elp3	pef1	kat9	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526494	2541801	2539366	278292	275932	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC16C4.11	snf5	pef1	-	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.6966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526495	2543160	2539366	279591	275932	SPAC31A2.14	SPCC16C4.11	bun107	pef1	wdr48	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526496	2543064	2539366	279497	275932	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC16C4.11	hrp3	pef1	-	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.7533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526497	2543164	2539366	279595	275932	SPAC3G6.06c	SPCC16C4.11	rad2	pef1	fen1	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526498	2543643	2539366	280057	275932	SPAC3G9.07c	SPCC16C4.11	hos2	pef1	hda1|phd1	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.1375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526499	2543592	2539366	280007	275932	SPAC4F10.18	SPCC16C4.11	nup37	pef1	-	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526500	2543426	2539366	279846	275932	SPAC631.02	SPCC16C4.11	bdf2	pef1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.2456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526501	2543580	2539366	279995	275932	SPAC644.14c	SPCC16C4.11	rad51	pef1	rhp51	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526502	2542198	2539366	278673	275932	SPAC6F12.09	SPCC16C4.11	rdp1	pef1	rdr1	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526503	2542021	2539366	278504	275932	SPAP14E8.02	SPCC16C4.11	tos4	pef1	SPAP14E8.02	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526504	2543372	2539366	279794	275932	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC16C4.11	ase1	pef1	-	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.5318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526505	2540060	2539366	276598	275932	SPBC106.01	SPCC16C4.11	mph1	pef1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526506	2539920	2539366	276464	275932	SPBC119.08	SPCC16C4.11	pmk1	pef1	spm1	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.3396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526507	2539930	2539366	276474	275932	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC16C4.11	reb1	pef1	SPBC660.01c	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.2361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526508	2539668	2539366	276223	275932	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC16C4.11	pht1	pef1	pi001	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.5255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526509	2539949	2539366	276493	275932	SPBC1703.04	SPCC16C4.11	mlh1	pef1	-	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526510	2539953	2539366	276497	275932	SPBC1709.11c	SPCC16C4.11	png2	pef1	-	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526511	2539876	2539366	276422	275932	SPBC1734.07c	SPCC16C4.11	trs8502	pef1	SPBC1734.07c	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526512	2539714	2539366	276267	275932	SPBC1861.07	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC1861.07	pef1	-	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526513	2540686	2539366	277211	275932	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC16C4.11	bdc1	pef1	-	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.3185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526514	2540512	2539366	277040	275932	SPBC29A3.05	SPCC16C4.11	vps71	pef1	-	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526515	2540346	2539366	276875	275932	SPBC2F12.03c	SPCC16C4.11	ebs1	pef1	SPBC2F12.03c	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526516	2540416	2539366	276944	275932	SPBC30B4.02c	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC30B4.02c	pef1	-	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526517	3361323	2539366	280399	275932	SPBC30D10.04	SPCC16C4.11	swi3	pef1	-	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526518	2540219	2539366	276752	275932	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC16C4.11	hip1	pef1	hir1	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526519	2540220	2539366	276753	275932	SPBC337.03	SPCC16C4.11	rhn1	pef1	SPBC337.03|iss4	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526520	2541017	2539366	277532	275932	SPBC36.07	SPCC16C4.11	elp1	pef1	iki3	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526521	2540968	2539366	277484	275932	SPBC3H7.07c	SPCC16C4.11	ser2	pef1	-	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.2313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526522	2540979	2539366	277495	275932	SPBC3H7.10	SPCC16C4.11	elp6	pef1	-	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526523	2540893	2539366	277409	275932	SPBC543.10	SPCC16C4.11	get1	pef1	-	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.7309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526524	2540821	2539366	277339	275932	SPBC800.03	SPCC16C4.11	clr3	pef1	-	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526525	2538987	2539366	275561	275932	SPCC11E10.06c	SPCC16C4.11	elp4	pef1	-	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526526	2539045	2539366	275618	275932	SPCC1235.05c	SPCC16C4.11	fft2	pef1	-	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526527	2542757	2539248	279207	275818	SPAC13C5.07	SPCC1739.03	mre11	hrr1	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526528	2541650	2539248	278146	275818	SPAC14C4.12c	SPCC1739.03	laf1	hrr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526529	2541580	2539248	278077	275818	SPAC1687.05	SPCC1739.03	pli1	hrr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526530	2542252	2539248	278722	275818	SPAC17A2.13c	SPCC1739.03	rad25	hrr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526531	2542277	2539248	278746	275818	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC1739.03	dbr1	hrr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.6448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526532	2542123	2539248	278599	275818	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC1739.03	mal3	hrr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.3116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526533	2542522	2539248	278980	275818	SPAC19A8.03	SPCC1739.03	ymr1	hrr1	SPAC19A8.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526534	2542237	2539248	278709	275818	SPAC19E9.02	SPCC1739.03	fin1	hrr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.1556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526535	2542550	2539248	279007	275818	SPAC1B3.02c	SPCC1739.03	SPAC1B3.02c	hrr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526536	2542007	2539248	278490	275818	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC1739.03	rad57	hrr1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526537	2542831	2539248	279278	275818	SPAC20H4.08	SPCC1739.03	whi2	hrr1	SPAC20H4.08|SPAC145.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526538	2542066	2539248	278543	275818	SPAC227.05	SPCC1739.03	SPAC227.05	hrr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526539	2541781	2539248	278274	275818	SPAC23G3.07c	SPCC1739.03	snf30	hrr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526540	2541845	2539248	278336	275818	SPAC23G3.08c	SPCC1739.03	ubp7	hrr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526541	2541856	2539248	278347	275818	SPAC23H3.08c	SPCC1739.03	bub3	hrr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526542	2541531	2539248	278031	275818	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1739.03	fft3	hrr1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526543	2541578	2539248	278075	275818	SPAC25B8.05	SPCC1739.03	deg1	hrr1	SPAC25B8.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526544	2541614	2539248	278111	275818	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC1739.03	elp3	hrr1	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526545	2541889	2539248	278379	275818	SPAC2F7.03c	SPCC1739.03	pom1	hrr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526546	2543160	2539248	279591	275818	SPAC31A2.14	SPCC1739.03	bun107	hrr1	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526547	2543078	2539248	279511	275818	SPAC31A2.15c	SPCC1739.03	dcc1	hrr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.21	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526548	2543190	2539248	279619	275818	SPAC31F12.01	SPCC1739.03	zds1	hrr1	SPAC637.14|mug88	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526549	2542592	2539248	279047	275818	SPAC328.01c	SPCC1739.03	msn5	hrr1	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526550	2543106	2539248	279538	275818	SPAC3A11.13	SPCC1739.03	SPAC3A11.13	hrr1	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526551	2543118	2539248	279550	275818	SPAC3G6.11	SPCC1739.03	chl1	hrr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526552	2543378	2539248	279800	275818	SPAC3H8.07c	SPCC1739.03	pac10	hrr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526553	2543529	2539248	279947	275818	SPAC4C5.02c	SPCC1739.03	ryh1	hrr1	hos1|sat7	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526554	2543426	2539248	279846	275818	SPAC631.02	SPCC1739.03	bdf2	hrr1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526555	2543240	2539248	279668	275818	SPAC694.06c	SPCC1739.03	mrc1	hrr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.9113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526556	2542055	2539248	278534	275818	SPAC6G9.03c	SPCC1739.03	mug183	hrr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526557	2541819	2539248	278310	275818	SPAC6G9.08	SPCC1739.03	ubp6	hrr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526558	2542845	2539248	279291	275818	SPAC824.04	SPCC1739.03	SPAC824.04	hrr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526559	2543341	2539248	279764	275818	SPAC8E11.07c	SPCC1739.03	alp31	hrr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.8848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526560	2543372	2539248	279794	275818	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC1739.03	ase1	hrr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.8988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526561	2543670	2539248	280084	275818	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPCC1739.03	eme1	hrr1	mms4|slx2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526562	2540060	2539248	276598	275818	SPBC106.01	SPCC1739.03	mph1	hrr1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.9869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526563	2539971	2539248	276515	275818	SPBC1105.04c	SPCC1739.03	cbp1	hrr1	abp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526564	2539930	2539248	276474	275818	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC1739.03	reb1	hrr1	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526565	2539812	2539248	276362	275818	SPBC1347.02	SPCC1739.03	fkbp39	hrr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.7345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526566	2539949	2539248	276493	275818	SPBC1703.04	SPCC1739.03	mlh1	hrr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526567	2539999	2539248	276543	275818	SPBC1734.15	SPCC1739.03	rsc4	hrr1	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526568	2540589	2539248	277115	275818	SPBC20F10.06	SPCC1739.03	mad2	hrr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526569	2540664	2539248	277189	275818	SPBC215.02	SPCC1739.03	bob1	hrr1	gim5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526570	2540498	2539248	277026	275818	SPBC27.02c	SPCC1739.03	ask1	hrr1	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526571	2540353	2539248	276882	275818	SPBC2F12.12c	SPCC1739.03	cay1	hrr1	SPBC2F12.12c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526572	3361323	2539248	280399	275818	SPBC30D10.04	SPCC1739.03	swi3	hrr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526573	2540945	2539248	277461	275818	SPBC342.06c	SPCC1739.03	rtt109	hrr1	kat11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.66	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526574	2540320	2539248	276850	275818	SPBC3D6.04c	SPCC1739.03	mad1	hrr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526575	2540968	2539248	277484	275818	SPBC3H7.07c	SPCC1739.03	ser2	hrr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526576	2540821	2539248	277339	275818	SPBC800.03	SPCC1739.03	clr3	hrr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526577	2540936	2539248	277452	275818	SPBC800.05c	SPCC1739.03	atb2	hrr1	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526578	2541208	2539248	277722	275818	SPBC887.04c	SPCC1739.03	lub1	hrr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526579	2541287	2539248	277800	275818	SPBP22H7.05c	SPCC1739.03	abo2	hrr1	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526580	2541379	2539248	277890	275818	SPBP8B7.27	SPCC1739.03	mug30	hrr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526581	2538987	2539248	275561	275818	SPCC11E10.06c	SPCC1739.03	elp4	hrr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526582	2542519	2538853	278977	275434	SPAC19G12.08	SPCC1739.05	scs7	set5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526583	2542701	2538853	279154	275434	SPAC26H5.05	SPCC1739.05	mga2	set5	SPAC26H5.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526584	2543190	2538853	279619	275434	SPAC31F12.01	SPCC1739.05	zds1	set5	SPAC637.14|mug88	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526585	2539971	2538853	276515	275434	SPBC1105.04c	SPCC1739.05	cbp1	set5	abp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526586	2539911	2538853	276456	275434	SPBC15D4.10c	SPCC1739.05	amo1	set5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526587	2540822	2538853	277340	275434	SPBC18E5.05c	SPCC1739.05	elp5	set5	iki1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526588	2540354	2538853	276883	275434	SPBC29A3.13	SPCC1739.05	pdp1	set5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526589	2540353	2538853	276882	275434	SPBC2F12.12c	SPCC1739.05	cay1	set5	SPBC2F12.12c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526590	2540968	2538853	277484	275434	SPBC3H7.07c	SPCC1739.05	ser2	set5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526591	2542757	2539041	279207	275614	SPAC13C5.07	SPCC18.06c	mre11	caf1	rad32	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.95	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526592	2542311	2539041	278777	275614	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC18.06c	dad1	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.8402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526593	2542318	2539041	278784	275614	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC18.06c	cph1	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526594	2542409	2539041	278873	275614	SPAC17G8.10c	SPCC18.06c	dma1	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526595	2542123	2539041	278599	275614	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC18.06c	mal3	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526596	2542513	2539041	278971	275614	SPAC1952.05	SPCC18.06c	gcn5	caf1	kat2	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526597	2542466	2539041	278927	275614	SPAC19E9.01c	SPCC18.06c	nup40	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526598	2542459	2539041	278920	275614	SPAC1D4.03c	SPCC18.06c	aut12	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526599	2541941	2539041	278428	275614	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC18.06c	tfs1	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.82	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526600	2542007	2539041	278490	275614	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC18.06c	rad57	caf1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526601	2541899	2539041	278389	275614	SPAC22E12.11c	SPCC18.06c	set3	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526602	2542036	2539041	278518	275614	SPAC23A1.19c	SPCC18.06c	hrq1	caf1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526603	2541845	2539041	278336	275614	SPAC23G3.08c	SPCC18.06c	ubp7	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526604	2542094	2539041	278571	275614	SPAC29B12.06c	SPCC18.06c	rcd1	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526605	2541672	2539041	278168	275614	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC18.06c	lsk1	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526606	2542516	2539041	278974	275614	SPAC2F7.04	SPCC18.06c	pmc2	caf1	med1	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526607	2541801	2539041	278292	275614	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC18.06c	snf5	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526608	2543160	2539041	279591	275614	SPAC31A2.14	SPCC18.06c	bun107	caf1	wdr48	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526609	2543044	2539041	279479	275614	SPAC3C7.12	SPCC18.06c	tip1	caf1	noc1	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526610	2543452	2539041	279872	275614	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC18.06c	ssu72	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.4042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526611	2543643	2539041	280057	275614	SPAC3G9.07c	SPCC18.06c	hos2	caf1	hda1|phd1	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526612	2543443	2539041	279863	275614	SPAC3H1.12c	SPCC18.06c	snt2	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526613	2543576	2539041	279991	275614	SPAC4A8.05c	SPCC18.06c	myp2	caf1	myo3	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526614	2543616	2539041	280030	275614	SPAC4A8.09c	SPCC18.06c	cwf21	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526615	2541633	2539041	278129	275614	SPAC664.01c	SPCC18.06c	swi6	caf1	SPAC824.10c	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526616	2543563	2539041	279979	275614	SPAC664.02c	SPCC18.06c	arp8	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.1575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526617	2543387	2539041	279809	275614	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC18.06c	mcl1	caf1	slr3	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526618	2540060	2539041	276598	275614	SPBC106.01	SPCC18.06c	mph1	caf1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526619	2540173	2539041	276706	275614	SPBC106.13	SPCC18.06c	SPBC106.13	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526620	2539920	2539041	276464	275614	SPBC119.08	SPCC18.06c	pmk1	caf1	spm1	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526621	2539930	2539041	276474	275614	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC18.06c	reb1	caf1	SPBC660.01c	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526622	2539668	2539041	276223	275614	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC18.06c	pht1	caf1	pi001	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.6801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526623	2540008	2539041	276552	275614	SPBC12D12.02c	SPCC18.06c	cdm1	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526624	2539651	2539041	276206	275614	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC18.06c	srb11	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526625	2539812	2539041	276362	275614	SPBC1347.02	SPCC18.06c	fkbp39	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526626	2539740	2539041	276292	275614	SPBC1685.04	SPCC18.06c	SPBC1685.04	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526627	2539700	2539041	276253	275614	SPBC1685.15c	SPCC18.06c	klp6	caf1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526628	2539733	2539041	276285	275614	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC18.06c	pab2	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.7955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526629	2539925	2539041	276469	275614	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC18.06c	SPBC16H5.13	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.3022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526630	2539922	2539041	276466	275614	SPBC1773.11c	SPCC18.06c	mug89	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526631	2540678	2539041	277203	275614	SPBC1A4.10c	SPCC18.06c	pmc1	caf1	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526632	2540686	2539041	277211	275614	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC18.06c	bdc1	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526633	2540498	2539041	277026	275614	SPBC27.02c	SPCC18.06c	ask1	caf1	mug181	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526634	2540436	2539041	276964	275614	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC18.06c	ngg1	caf1	ada3|kap1	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526635	2540348	2539041	276877	275614	SPBC29A10.05	SPCC18.06c	exo1	caf1	mut2	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526636	2540597	2539041	277123	275614	SPBC29A3.09c	SPCC18.06c	SPBC29A3.09c	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526637	2540995	2539041	277511	275614	SPBC337.16	SPCC18.06c	cho1	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526638	2540945	2539041	277461	275614	SPBC342.06c	SPCC18.06c	rtt109	caf1	kat11	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526639	2539847	2539041	276395	275614	SPBC530.14c	SPCC18.06c	dsk1	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526640	2540919	2539041	277435	275614	SPBC543.07	SPCC18.06c	pek1	caf1	mkk1|skh1	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526641	2540913	2539041	277429	275614	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC18.06c	SPBC56F2.08c	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526642	2541120	2539041	277635	275614	SPBC649.03	SPCC18.06c	rhp14	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526643	2540936	2539041	277452	275614	SPBC800.05c	SPCC18.06c	atb2	caf1	alp2|ban5|tub1	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526644	2540829	2539041	277347	275614	SPBC800.09	SPCC18.06c	sum2	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.0969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526645	2540735	2539041	277258	275614	SPBC83.03c	SPCC18.06c	tas3	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.3499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526646	2541135	2539041	277650	275614	SPBC839.03c	SPCC18.06c	SPBC839.03c	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526647	2541175	2539041	277689	275614	SPBC839.13c	SPCC18.06c	rpl1601	caf1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526648	2541270	2539041	277784	275614	SPBC902.02c	SPCC18.06c	ctf18	caf1	chl12	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.0307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526649	2541284	2539041	277797	275614	SPBC947.08c	SPCC18.06c	hip4	caf1	hpc2	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526650	2541292	2539041	277804	275614	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC18.06c	sdh4	caf1	tim18	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526651	2538701	2539041	275286	275614	SPCC1235.09	SPCC18.06c	hif2	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.9568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526652	2538906	2539041	275483	275614	SPCC1259.03	SPCC18.06c	rpa12	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526653	2538690	2539041	275275	275614	SPCC1393.05	SPCC18.06c	ers1	caf1	-	pop2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526654	2543263	2538966	279691	275540	SPAC1002.15c	SPCC18.10	med6	SPCC18.10	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.0973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526655	3361561	2538966	280637	275540	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC18.10	swr1	SPCC18.10	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526656	2542277	2538966	278746	275540	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC18.10	dbr1	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526657	2542421	2538966	278884	275540	SPAC17G8.05	SPCC18.10	med20	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.9347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526658	2542278	2538966	278747	275540	SPAC17G8.07	SPCC18.10	yaf9	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.4997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526659	2542418	2538966	278881	275540	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC18.10	dad2	SPCC18.10	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.6556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526660	2541899	2538966	278389	275540	SPAC22E12.11c	SPCC18.10	set3	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526661	2541496	2538966	277998	275540	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC18.10	arp42	SPCC18.10	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526662	2541531	2538966	278031	275540	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC18.10	fft3	SPCC18.10	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.8701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526663	2541578	2538966	278075	275540	SPAC25B8.05	SPCC18.10	deg1	SPCC18.10	SPAC25B8.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526664	2541710	2538966	278205	275540	SPAC343.11c	SPCC18.10	msc1	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526665	2543064	2538966	279497	275540	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC18.10	hrp3	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526666	2543452	2538966	279872	275540	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC18.10	ssu72	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.6092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526667	2543643	2538966	280057	275540	SPAC3G9.07c	SPCC18.10	hos2	SPCC18.10	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526668	2543443	2538966	279863	275540	SPAC3H1.12c	SPCC18.10	snt2	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.2502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526669	2543426	2538966	279846	275540	SPAC631.02	SPCC18.10	bdf2	SPCC18.10	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526670	2543563	2538966	279979	275540	SPAC664.02c	SPCC18.10	arp8	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-23.5046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526671	2543226	2538966	279654	275540	SPAC6B12.05c	SPCC18.10	ies2	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526672	2542845	2538966	279291	275540	SPAC824.04	SPCC18.10	SPAC824.04	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.9436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526673	2542102	2538966	278578	275540	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC18.10	spc34	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526674	2543372	2538966	279794	275540	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC18.10	ase1	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526675	2541470	2538966	277972	275540	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPCC18.10	rpb9	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526676	2539971	2538966	276515	275540	SPBC1105.04c	SPCC18.10	cbp1	SPCC18.10	abp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526677	2539930	2538966	276474	275540	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC18.10	reb1	SPCC18.10	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526678	2539668	2538966	276223	275540	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC18.10	pht1	SPCC18.10	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.3533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526679	2539911	2538966	276456	275540	SPBC15D4.10c	SPCC18.10	amo1	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526680	2539700	2538966	276253	275540	SPBC1685.15c	SPCC18.10	klp6	SPCC18.10	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526681	2539953	2538966	276497	275540	SPBC1709.11c	SPCC18.10	png2	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.7592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526682	2539999	2538966	276543	275540	SPBC1734.15	SPCC18.10	rsc4	SPCC18.10	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526683	2540317	2538966	276847	275540	SPBC24C6.05	SPCC18.10	sec28	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526684	2540498	2538966	277026	275540	SPBC27.02c	SPCC18.10	ask1	SPCC18.10	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.7299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526685	2540512	2538966	277040	275540	SPBC29A3.05	SPCC18.10	vps71	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526686	2540353	2538966	276882	275540	SPBC2F12.12c	SPCC18.10	cay1	SPCC18.10	SPBC2F12.12c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.5816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526687	3361323	2538966	280399	275540	SPBC30D10.04	SPCC18.10	swi3	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526688	2540322	2538966	276852	275540	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC18.10	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526689	2540967	2538966	277483	275540	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC18.10	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.0549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526690	2540749	2538966	277271	275540	SPBC4B4.03	SPCC18.10	rsc1	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526691	2541088	2538966	277603	275540	SPBC609.05	SPCC18.10	pob3	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526692	2541337	2538966	277848	275540	SPBP35G2.13c	SPCC18.10	swc2	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526693	2538906	2538966	275483	275540	SPCC1259.03	SPCC18.10	rpa12	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526694	2543263	2539145	279691	275717	SPAC1002.15c	SPCC18.11c	med6	sdc1	pmc5	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.8673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526695	3361561	2539145	280637	275717	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC18.11c	swr1	sdc1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-18.6106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526696	2542788	2539145	279237	275717	SPAC15A10.15	SPCC18.11c	sgo2	sdc1	-	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526697	2542277	2539145	278746	275717	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC18.11c	dbr1	sdc1	-	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.7602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526698	2542278	2539145	278747	275717	SPAC17G8.07	SPCC18.11c	yaf9	sdc1	-	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.8893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526699	2542418	2539145	278881	275717	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC18.11c	dad2	sdc1	hos2	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526700	2542123	2539145	278599	275717	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC18.11c	mal3	sdc1	-	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526701	2541899	2539145	278389	275717	SPAC22E12.11c	SPCC18.11c	set3	sdc1	-	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.5614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526702	2541496	2539145	277998	275717	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC18.11c	arp42	sdc1	arp4	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.4756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526703	2541531	2539145	278031	275717	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC18.11c	fft3	sdc1	snf2SR	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.6606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526704	2541578	2539145	278075	275717	SPAC25B8.05	SPCC18.11c	deg1	sdc1	SPAC25B8.05	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526705	2542701	2539145	279154	275717	SPAC26H5.05	SPCC18.11c	mga2	sdc1	SPAC26H5.05	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526706	2541889	2539145	278379	275717	SPAC2F7.03c	SPCC18.11c	pom1	sdc1	-	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526707	2543190	2539145	279619	275717	SPAC31F12.01	SPCC18.11c	zds1	sdc1	SPAC637.14|mug88	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526708	2541710	2539145	278205	275717	SPAC343.11c	SPCC18.11c	msc1	sdc1	-	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526709	2543064	2539145	279497	275717	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC18.11c	hrp3	sdc1	-	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.19	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526710	2543452	2539145	279872	275717	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC18.11c	ssu72	sdc1	-	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.2996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526711	2543643	2539145	280057	275717	SPAC3G9.07c	SPCC18.11c	hos2	sdc1	hda1|phd1	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.3745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526712	2543443	2539145	279863	275717	SPAC3H1.12c	SPCC18.11c	snt2	sdc1	-	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.9208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526713	2543616	2539145	280030	275717	SPAC4A8.09c	SPCC18.11c	cwf21	sdc1	-	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526714	2543426	2539145	279846	275717	SPAC631.02	SPCC18.11c	bdf2	sdc1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-19.3287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526715	2543563	2539145	279979	275717	SPAC664.02c	SPCC18.11c	arp8	sdc1	-	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-18.9178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526716	2543226	2539145	279654	275717	SPAC6B12.05c	SPCC18.11c	ies2	sdc1	-	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.8278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526717	2542845	2539145	279291	275717	SPAC824.04	SPCC18.11c	SPAC824.04	sdc1	-	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.7785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526718	2543372	2539145	279794	275717	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC18.11c	ase1	sdc1	-	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526719	2541470	2539145	277972	275717	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPCC18.11c	rpb9	sdc1	-	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526720	2539971	2539145	276515	275717	SPBC1105.04c	SPCC18.11c	cbp1	sdc1	abp1	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526721	2539930	2539145	276474	275717	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC18.11c	reb1	sdc1	SPBC660.01c	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.3809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526722	2539668	2539145	276223	275717	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC18.11c	pht1	sdc1	pi001	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.2914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526723	2539911	2539145	276456	275717	SPBC15D4.10c	SPCC18.11c	amo1	sdc1	-	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526724	2539700	2539145	276253	275717	SPBC1685.15c	SPCC18.11c	klp6	sdc1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526725	2540032	2539145	276575	275717	SPBC1703.14c	SPCC18.11c	top1	sdc1	-	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526726	2539953	2539145	276497	275717	SPBC1709.11c	SPCC18.11c	png2	sdc1	-	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526727	2540077	2539145	276615	275717	SPBC17D11.04c	SPCC18.11c	nto1	sdc1	-	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526728	2540686	2539145	277211	275717	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC18.11c	bdc1	sdc1	-	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.0349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526729	2540531	2539145	277059	275717	SPBC23E6.08	SPCC18.11c	sat1	sdc1	-	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.9449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526730	2540498	2539145	277026	275717	SPBC27.02c	SPCC18.11c	ask1	sdc1	mug181	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.9391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526731	2540512	2539145	277040	275717	SPBC29A3.05	SPCC18.11c	vps71	sdc1	-	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.5929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526732	2540353	2539145	276882	275717	SPBC2F12.12c	SPCC18.11c	cay1	sdc1	SPBC2F12.12c	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526733	2540967	2539145	277483	275717	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC18.11c	SPBC36B7.08c	sdc1	-	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526734	2540968	2539145	277484	275717	SPBC3H7.07c	SPCC18.11c	ser2	sdc1	-	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526735	2540749	2539145	277271	275717	SPBC4B4.03	SPCC18.11c	rsc1	sdc1	-	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.6245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526736	2541088	2539145	277603	275717	SPBC609.05	SPCC18.11c	pob3	sdc1	-	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526737	2540821	2539145	277339	275717	SPBC800.03	SPCC18.11c	clr3	sdc1	-	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526738	2541284	2539145	277797	275717	SPBC947.08c	SPCC18.11c	hip4	sdc1	hpc2	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526739	2541337	2539145	277848	275717	SPBP35G2.13c	SPCC18.11c	swc2	sdc1	-	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526740	2538906	2539145	275483	275717	SPCC1259.03	SPCC18.11c	rpa12	sdc1	-	dpy30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526741	2541536	2539246	278036	275816	SPAC1071.02	SPCC18.13	mms19	SPCC18.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526742	2542126	2539246	278602	275816	SPAC1B3.05	SPCC18.13	not3	SPCC18.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526743	2541470	2539246	277972	275816	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPCC18.13	rpb9	SPCC18.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526744	2539667	2539246	276222	275816	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC18.13	ash2	SPCC18.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526745	2540306	2539246	276836	275816	SPBC2G5.02c	SPCC18.13	ckb2	SPCC18.13	SPBC2G5.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526746	2543263	2539379	279691	275945	SPAC1002.15c	SPCC188.02	med6	par1	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526747	2542135	2539379	278611	275945	SPAC13A11.04c	SPCC188.02	ubp8	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526748	2542757	2539379	279207	275945	SPAC13C5.07	SPCC188.02	mre11	par1	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.6289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526749	2542349	2539379	278814	275945	SPAC1782.05	SPCC188.02	ypa2	par1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.7256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526750	2542277	2539379	278746	275945	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC188.02	dbr1	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526751	2542168	2539379	278643	275945	SPAC17A5.16	SPCC188.02	ftp105	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526752	2542421	2539379	278884	275945	SPAC17G8.05	SPCC188.02	med20	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.1299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526753	2542278	2539379	278747	275945	SPAC17G8.07	SPCC188.02	yaf9	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.2208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526754	2542409	2539379	278873	275945	SPAC17G8.10c	SPCC188.02	dma1	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.1931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526755	2542418	2539379	278881	275945	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC188.02	dad2	par1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526756	2542467	2539379	278928	275945	SPAC1834.04	SPCC188.02	hht1	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526757	2542123	2539379	278599	275945	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC188.02	mal3	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526758	2542568	2539379	279024	275945	SPAC1952.02	SPCC188.02	tma23	par1	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526759	2542513	2539379	278971	275945	SPAC1952.05	SPCC188.02	gcn5	par1	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.98	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526760	2542469	2539379	278930	275945	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC188.02	erg5	par1	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526761	2542237	2539379	278709	275945	SPAC19E9.02	SPCC188.02	fin1	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526762	2541941	2539379	278428	275945	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC188.02	tfs1	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526763	2542007	2539379	278490	275945	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC188.02	rad57	par1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526764	2541899	2539379	278389	275945	SPAC22E12.11c	SPCC188.02	set3	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526765	2541496	2539379	277998	275945	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC188.02	arp42	par1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.5221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526766	2541845	2539379	278336	275945	SPAC23G3.08c	SPCC188.02	ubp7	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526767	2541776	2539379	278270	275945	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC188.02	swd1	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526768	2542701	2539379	279154	275945	SPAC26H5.05	SPCC188.02	mga2	par1	SPAC26H5.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526769	2541801	2539379	278292	275945	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC188.02	snf5	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526770	2543160	2539379	279591	275945	SPAC31A2.14	SPCC188.02	bun107	par1	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526771	2543190	2539379	279619	275945	SPAC31F12.01	SPCC188.02	zds1	par1	SPAC637.14|mug88	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526772	2541710	2539379	278205	275945	SPAC343.11c	SPCC188.02	msc1	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526773	2543044	2539379	279479	275945	SPAC3C7.12	SPCC188.02	tip1	par1	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526774	2543064	2539379	279497	275945	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC188.02	hrp3	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526775	2543452	2539379	279872	275945	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC188.02	ssu72	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526776	2543643	2539379	280057	275945	SPAC3G9.07c	SPCC188.02	hos2	par1	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526777	2543619	2539379	280033	275945	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC188.02	ypa1	par1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.5141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526778	2543516	2539379	279934	275945	SPAC4F10.11	SPCC188.02	spn1	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526779	2543426	2539379	279846	275945	SPAC631.02	SPCC188.02	bdf2	par1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.2337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526780	2543580	2539379	279995	275945	SPAC644.14c	SPCC188.02	rad51	par1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526781	2543563	2539379	279979	275945	SPAC664.02c	SPCC188.02	arp8	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526782	2542198	2539379	278673	275945	SPAC6F12.09	SPCC188.02	rdp1	par1	rdr1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526783	2542891	2539379	279335	275945	SPAC6F12.12	SPCC188.02	par2	par1	pbp2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.8225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526784	2543513	2539379	279931	275945	SPAC821.06	SPCC188.02	spn2	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526785	2542845	2539379	279291	275945	SPAC824.04	SPCC188.02	SPAC824.04	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526786	2543341	2539379	279764	275945	SPAC8E11.07c	SPCC188.02	alp31	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526787	2543668	2539379	280082	275945	SPAC9.05	SPCC188.02	fml1	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526788	2539971	2539379	276515	275945	SPBC1105.04c	SPCC188.02	cbp1	par1	abp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526789	2539930	2539379	276474	275945	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC188.02	reb1	par1	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.6153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526790	2539668	2539379	276223	275945	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC188.02	pht1	par1	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.1202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526791	2539667	2539379	276222	275945	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC188.02	ash2	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.9649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526792	2539857	2539379	276404	275945	SPBC1604.20c	SPCC188.02	tea2	par1	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526793	2540019	2539379	276563	275945	SPBC1685.01	SPCC188.02	pmp1	par1	dsp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526794	2540154	2539379	276690	275945	SPBC16C6.05	SPCC188.02	SPBC16C6.05	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526795	2539999	2539379	276543	275945	SPBC1734.15	SPCC188.02	rsc4	par1	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526796	2539714	2539379	276267	275945	SPBC1861.07	SPCC188.02	SPBC1861.07	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526797	2540788	2539379	277307	275945	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC188.02	swd2	par1	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526798	2540787	2539379	277306	275945	SPBC1921.07c	SPCC188.02	sgf29	par1	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526799	2540317	2539379	276847	275945	SPBC24C6.05	SPCC188.02	sec28	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526800	2540436	2539379	276964	275945	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC188.02	ngg1	par1	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.8586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526801	2540512	2539379	277040	275945	SPBC29A3.05	SPCC188.02	vps71	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.5134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526802	2540353	2539379	276882	275945	SPBC2F12.12c	SPCC188.02	cay1	par1	SPBC2F12.12c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526803	2540306	2539379	276836	275945	SPBC2G5.02c	SPCC188.02	ckb2	par1	SPBC2G5.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526804	2540396	2539379	276924	275945	SPBC31F10.12	SPCC188.02	tma20	par1	SPBC31F10.12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526805	2540219	2539379	276752	275945	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC188.02	hip1	par1	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526806	2540929	2539379	277445	275945	SPBC354.03	SPCC188.02	swd3	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.5215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526807	2540979	2539379	277495	275945	SPBC3H7.10	SPCC188.02	elp6	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526808	2540749	2539379	277271	275945	SPBC4B4.03	SPCC188.02	rsc1	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.1186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526809	2540999	2539379	277515	275945	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC188.02	SPBC4B4.04	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526810	2540936	2539379	277452	275945	SPBC800.05c	SPCC188.02	atb2	par1	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526811	2540829	2539379	277347	275945	SPBC800.09	SPCC188.02	sum2	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526812	2540741	2539379	277264	275945	SPBC83.05	SPCC188.02	SPBC83.05	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526813	2541284	2539379	277797	275945	SPBC947.08c	SPCC188.02	hip4	par1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526814	2541349	2539379	277860	275945	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC188.02	air1	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526815	2538701	2539379	275286	275945	SPCC1235.09	SPCC188.02	hif2	par1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526816	2541628	2538930	278124	275506	SPAC110.02	SPCC188.13c	pds5	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526817	2543008	2538930	279446	275506	SPAC12B10.13	SPCC188.13c	SPAC12B10.13	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526818	2541650	2538930	278146	275506	SPAC14C4.12c	SPCC188.13c	laf1	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526819	2541580	2538930	278077	275506	SPAC1687.05	SPCC188.13c	pli1	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526820	2542318	2538930	278784	275506	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC188.13c	cph1	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526821	2542277	2538930	278746	275506	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC188.13c	dbr1	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526822	2542398	2538930	278862	275506	SPAC1805.03c	SPCC188.13c	trm13	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526823	2542418	2538930	278881	275506	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC188.13c	dad2	dcr1	hos2	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526824	2542123	2538930	278599	275506	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC188.13c	mal3	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526825	2542568	2538930	279024	275506	SPAC1952.02	SPCC188.13c	tma23	dcr1	SPAC1952.02	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526826	2542237	2538930	278709	275506	SPAC19E9.02	SPCC188.13c	fin1	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.0825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526827	2542519	2538930	278977	275506	SPAC19G12.08	SPCC188.13c	scs7	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526828	2542023	2538930	278506	275506	SPAC20H4.10	SPCC188.13c	ufd2	dcr1	SPAC145.04	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526829	2542066	2538930	278543	275506	SPAC227.05	SPCC188.13c	SPAC227.05	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526830	2541856	2538930	278347	275506	SPAC23H3.08c	SPCC188.13c	bub3	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526831	2541531	2538930	278031	275506	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC188.13c	fft3	dcr1	snf2SR	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526832	2541889	2538930	278379	275506	SPAC2F7.03c	SPCC188.13c	pom1	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526833	2542592	2538930	279047	275506	SPAC328.01c	SPCC188.13c	msn5	dcr1	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526834	2543118	2538930	279550	275506	SPAC3G6.11	SPCC188.13c	chl1	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526835	2543643	2538930	280057	275506	SPAC3G9.07c	SPCC188.13c	hos2	dcr1	hda1|phd1	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526836	2543529	2538930	279947	275506	SPAC4C5.02c	SPCC188.13c	ryh1	dcr1	hos1|sat7	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526837	2543426	2538930	279846	275506	SPAC631.02	SPCC188.13c	bdf2	dcr1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526838	2543563	2538930	279979	275506	SPAC664.02c	SPCC188.13c	arp8	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526839	2543240	2538930	279668	275506	SPAC694.06c	SPCC188.13c	mrc1	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.7724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526840	2542845	2538930	279291	275506	SPAC824.04	SPCC188.13c	SPAC824.04	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526841	2542102	2538930	278578	275506	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC188.13c	spc34	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526842	2543341	2538930	279764	275506	SPAC8E11.07c	SPCC188.13c	alp31	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.6581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526843	2543289	2538930	279714	275506	SPAC9E9.08	SPCC188.13c	rad26	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526844	2543372	2538930	279794	275506	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC188.13c	ase1	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.3303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526845	2543387	2538930	279809	275506	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC188.13c	mcl1	dcr1	slr3	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.3315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526846	2543670	2538930	280084	275506	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPCC188.13c	eme1	dcr1	mms4|slx2	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526847	2543463	2538930	279883	275506	SPAPB21F2.03	SPCC188.13c	slx9	dcr1	SPAPB21F2.03	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526848	2540060	2538930	276598	275506	SPBC106.01	SPCC188.13c	mph1	dcr1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526849	2539971	2538930	276515	275506	SPBC1105.04c	SPCC188.13c	cbp1	dcr1	abp1	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526850	2539812	2538930	276362	275506	SPBC1347.02	SPCC188.13c	fkbp39	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.7981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526851	2540822	2538930	277340	275506	SPBC18E5.05c	SPCC188.13c	elp5	dcr1	iki1	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526852	2540680	2538930	277205	275506	SPBC26H8.05c	SPCC188.13c	pph3	dcr1	SPBC26H8.05c	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526853	2540498	2538930	277026	275506	SPBC27.02c	SPCC188.13c	ask1	dcr1	mug181	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526854	2540597	2538930	277123	275506	SPBC29A3.09c	SPCC188.13c	SPBC29A3.09c	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526855	2540354	2538930	276883	275506	SPBC29A3.13	SPCC188.13c	pdp1	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526856	2540353	2538930	276882	275506	SPBC2F12.12c	SPCC188.13c	cay1	dcr1	SPBC2F12.12c	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526857	3361323	2538930	280399	275506	SPBC30D10.04	SPCC188.13c	swi3	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526858	2540219	2538930	276752	275506	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC188.13c	hip1	dcr1	hir1	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526859	2541101	2538930	277616	275506	SPBC609.02	SPCC188.13c	ptn1	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526860	2541088	2538930	277603	275506	SPBC609.05	SPCC188.13c	pob3	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.0652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526861	2540821	2538930	277339	275506	SPBC800.03	SPCC188.13c	clr3	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526862	2540936	2538930	277452	275506	SPBC800.05c	SPCC188.13c	atb2	dcr1	alp2|ban5|tub1	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526863	2541284	2538930	277797	275506	SPBC947.08c	SPCC188.13c	hip4	dcr1	hpc2	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.5651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526864	2541287	2538930	277800	275506	SPBP22H7.05c	SPCC188.13c	abo2	dcr1	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526865	2541361	2538930	277872	275506	SPBP8B7.10c	SPCC188.13c	utp16	dcr1	SPBP8B7.10c	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526866	2539082	2538930	275654	275506	SPCC126.03	SPCC188.13c	pus1	dcr1	lps1	SPCC584.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526867	2540893	2539014	277409	275587	SPBC543.10	SPCC18B5.05c	get1	SPCC18B5.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526868	2541088	2539014	277603	275587	SPBC609.05	SPCC18B5.05c	pob3	SPCC18B5.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526869	2543384	2539348	279806	275914	SPAC637.06	SPCC18B5.07c	gmh5	nup61	SPAC637.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526870	2543463	2539348	279883	275914	SPAPB21F2.03	SPCC18B5.07c	slx9	nup61	SPAPB21F2.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-21.4194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526871	2539651	2539348	276206	275914	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC18B5.07c	srb11	nup61	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526872	2540354	2539348	276883	275914	SPBC29A3.13	SPCC18B5.07c	pdp1	nup61	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526873	2540353	2539348	276882	275914	SPBC2F12.12c	SPCC18B5.07c	cay1	nup61	SPBC2F12.12c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.2392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526874	2540322	2539348	276852	275914	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC18B5.07c	SPBC31F10.10c	nup61	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526875	2540219	2539348	276752	275914	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC18B5.07c	hip1	nup61	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526876	2540893	2539348	277409	275914	SPBC543.10	SPCC18B5.07c	get1	nup61	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526877	2539050	2539348	275623	275914	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC18B5.07c	rik1	nup61	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526878	2539248	2539348	275818	275914	SPCC1739.03	SPCC18B5.07c	hrr1	nup61	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526879	2539041	2539348	275614	275914	SPCC18.06c	SPCC18B5.07c	caf1	nup61	pop2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526880	2539733	2539362	276285	275928	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC18B5.10c	pab2	SPCC18B5.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526881	2540893	2539362	277409	275928	SPBC543.10	SPCC18B5.10c	get1	SPCC18B5.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526882	2542757	2538959	279207	275533	SPAC13C5.07	SPCC18B5.11c	mre11	cds1	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.6071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526883	2542207	2538959	278682	275533	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC18B5.11c	ddb1	cds1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.4873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526884	2543529	2538959	279947	275533	SPAC4C5.02c	SPCC18B5.11c	ryh1	cds1	hos1|sat7	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526885	2543580	2538959	279995	275533	SPAC644.14c	SPCC18B5.11c	rad51	cds1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526886	2543319	2538959	279743	275533	SPAC6B12.09	SPCC18B5.11c	trm10	cds1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526887	2540023	2538959	276567	275533	SPBC11C11.10	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC11C11.10	cds1	SPBC3B8.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526888	2539613	2538959	276171	275533	SPBC11C11.11c	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC11C11.11c	cds1	SPBC3B8.12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526889	2539960	2538959	276504	275533	SPBC15D4.15	SPCC18B5.11c	pho2	cds1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526890	2540115	2538959	276652	275533	SPBC1778.02	SPCC18B5.11c	rap1	cds1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526891	2540589	2538959	277115	275533	SPBC20F10.06	SPCC18B5.11c	mad2	cds1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526892	2540352	2538959	276881	275533	SPBC215.03c	SPCC18B5.11c	csn1	cds1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.4358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526893	2540270	2538959	276801	275533	SPBC2G2.02	SPCC18B5.11c	syj1	cds1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526894	3361323	2538959	280399	275533	SPBC30D10.04	SPCC18B5.11c	swi3	cds1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526895	2540893	2538959	277409	275533	SPBC543.10	SPCC18B5.11c	get1	cds1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.2719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526896	2541101	2538959	277616	275533	SPBC609.02	SPCC18B5.11c	ptn1	cds1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526897	2541121	2538959	277636	275533	SPBC609.03	SPCC18B5.11c	iqw1	cds1	iqwd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526898	2541628	2539130	278124	275702	SPAC110.02	SPCC1919.03c	pds5	amk2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526899	2542168	2539130	278643	275702	SPAC17A5.16	SPCC1919.03c	ftp105	amk2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526900	2542141	2539130	278617	275702	SPAC17C9.05c	SPCC1919.03c	pmc3	amk2	med27|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526901	2542522	2539130	278980	275702	SPAC19A8.03	SPCC1919.03c	ymr1	amk2	SPAC19A8.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526902	2542519	2539130	278977	275702	SPAC19G12.08	SPCC1919.03c	scs7	amk2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.2608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526903	2541899	2539130	278389	275702	SPAC22E12.11c	SPCC1919.03c	set3	amk2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526904	2541776	2539130	278270	275702	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC1919.03c	swd1	amk2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.3006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526905	2541672	2539130	278168	275702	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC1919.03c	lsk1	amk2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.5612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526906	2543190	2539130	279619	275702	SPAC31F12.01	SPCC1919.03c	zds1	amk2	SPAC637.14|mug88	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526907	2543643	2539130	280057	275702	SPAC3G9.07c	SPCC1919.03c	hos2	amk2	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526908	2542072	2539130	278549	275702	SPAP32A8.03c	SPCC1919.03c	bop1	amk2	SPAP32A8.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526909	2543387	2539130	279809	275702	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC1919.03c	mcl1	amk2	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526910	2539930	2539130	276474	275702	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC1919.03c	reb1	amk2	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526911	2539651	2539130	276206	275702	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC1919.03c	srb11	amk2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526912	2539667	2539130	276222	275702	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC1919.03c	ash2	amk2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526913	2539787	2539130	276337	275702	SPBC15C4.06c	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC15C4.06c	amk2	SPBC21H7.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526914	2539960	2539130	276504	275702	SPBC15D4.15	SPCC1919.03c	pho2	amk2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526915	2539925	2539130	276469	275702	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC16H5.13	amk2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.2477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526916	2539714	2539130	276267	275702	SPBC1861.07	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1861.07	amk2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526917	2540788	2539130	277307	275702	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC1919.03c	swd2	amk2	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.8044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526918	2540352	2539130	276881	275702	SPBC215.03c	SPCC1919.03c	csn1	amk2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526919	2540686	2539130	277211	275702	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC1919.03c	bdc1	amk2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526920	2540317	2539130	276847	275702	SPBC24C6.05	SPCC1919.03c	sec28	amk2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.4057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526921	2540498	2539130	277026	275702	SPBC27.02c	SPCC1919.03c	ask1	amk2	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526922	2540597	2539130	277123	275702	SPBC29A3.09c	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC29A3.09c	amk2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526923	2540322	2539130	276852	275702	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC31F10.10c	amk2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526924	2540221	2539130	276754	275702	SPBC32F12.02	SPCC1919.03c	rec14	amk2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526925	2540244	2539130	276776	275702	SPBC336.01	SPCC1919.03c	fbh1	amk2	fdh|fdh1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526926	2540995	2539130	277511	275702	SPBC337.16	SPCC1919.03c	cho1	amk2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526927	2540929	2539130	277445	275702	SPBC354.03	SPCC1919.03c	swd3	amk2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526928	2540968	2539130	277484	275702	SPBC3H7.07c	SPCC1919.03c	ser2	amk2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.2136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526929	2540825	2539130	277343	275702	SPBC428.08c	SPCC1919.03c	clr4	amk2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526930	2540999	2539130	277515	275702	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC4B4.04	amk2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526931	2540893	2539130	277409	275702	SPBC543.10	SPCC1919.03c	get1	amk2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526932	2538828	2539130	275409	275702	SPCC1020.05	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1020.05	amk2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526933	2538701	2539130	275286	275702	SPCC1235.09	SPCC1919.03c	hif2	amk2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526934	2539366	2539130	275932	275702	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC1919.03c	pef1	amk2	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526935	2539379	2539130	275945	275702	SPCC188.02	SPCC1919.03c	par1	amk2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526936	2538930	2539130	275506	275702	SPCC188.13c	SPCC1919.03c	dcr1	amk2	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526937	2541642	2539136	278138	275708	SPAC10F6.05c	SPCC1919.05	ubc6	SPCC1919.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526938	2542277	2539136	278746	275708	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC1919.05	dbr1	SPCC1919.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526939	2543529	2539136	279947	275708	SPAC4C5.02c	SPCC1919.05	ryh1	SPCC1919.05	hos1|sat7	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526940	2542198	2539136	278673	275708	SPAC6F12.09	SPCC1919.05	rdp1	SPCC1919.05	rdr1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526941	2539651	2539136	276206	275708	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC1919.05	srb11	SPCC1919.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526942	2539673	2539136	276228	275708	SPBC13G1.10c	SPCC1919.05	mug81	SPCC1919.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.7187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526943	2539900	2539136	276446	275708	SPBC17D11.02c	SPCC1919.05	hrd1	SPCC1919.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526944	2540968	2539136	277484	275708	SPBC3H7.07c	SPCC1919.05	ser2	SPCC1919.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526945	2540913	2539136	277429	275708	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC1919.05	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC1919.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526946	2540829	2539136	277347	275708	SPBC800.09	SPCC1919.05	sum2	SPCC1919.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.0521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526947	2541284	2539136	277797	275708	SPBC947.08c	SPCC1919.05	hip4	SPCC1919.05	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526948	3361561	2539319	280637	275885	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC1919.13c	swr1	SPCC1919.13c	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526949	2542278	2539319	278747	275885	SPAC17G8.07	SPCC1919.13c	yaf9	SPCC1919.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.8279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526950	2542126	2539319	278602	275885	SPAC1B3.05	SPCC1919.13c	not3	SPCC1919.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526951	2541776	2539319	278270	275885	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC1919.13c	swd1	SPCC1919.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526952	2541801	2539319	278292	275885	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC1919.13c	snf5	SPCC1919.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526953	2541710	2539319	278205	275885	SPAC343.11c	SPCC1919.13c	msc1	SPCC1919.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526954	2543064	2539319	279497	275885	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC1919.13c	hrp3	SPCC1919.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526955	2543443	2539319	279863	275885	SPAC3H1.12c	SPCC1919.13c	snt2	SPCC1919.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526956	2543619	2539319	280033	275885	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC1919.13c	ypa1	SPCC1919.13c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526957	2543426	2539319	279846	275885	SPAC631.02	SPCC1919.13c	bdf2	SPCC1919.13c	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.9728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526958	2543384	2539319	279806	275885	SPAC637.06	SPCC1919.13c	gmh5	SPCC1919.13c	SPAC637.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526959	2543563	2539319	279979	275885	SPAC664.02c	SPCC1919.13c	arp8	SPCC1919.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.1032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526960	2543226	2539319	279654	275885	SPAC6B12.05c	SPCC1919.13c	ies2	SPCC1919.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.7292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526961	2542055	2539319	278534	275885	SPAC6G9.03c	SPCC1919.13c	mug183	SPCC1919.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526962	2542845	2539319	279291	275885	SPAC824.04	SPCC1919.13c	SPAC824.04	SPCC1919.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.2201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526963	2543341	2539319	279764	275885	SPAC8E11.07c	SPCC1919.13c	alp31	SPCC1919.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526964	2542021	2539319	278504	275885	SPAP14E8.02	SPCC1919.13c	tos4	SPCC1919.13c	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526965	2541470	2539319	277972	275885	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPCC1919.13c	rpb9	SPCC1919.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526966	2539920	2539319	276464	275885	SPBC119.08	SPCC1919.13c	pmk1	SPCC1919.13c	spm1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526967	2539668	2539319	276223	275885	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC1919.13c	pht1	SPCC1919.13c	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.1642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526968	2539667	2539319	276222	275885	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC1919.13c	ash2	SPCC1919.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.9942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526969	2539953	2539319	276497	275885	SPBC1709.11c	SPCC1919.13c	png2	SPCC1919.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526970	2540686	2539319	277211	275885	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC1919.13c	bdc1	SPCC1919.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526971	2540512	2539319	277040	275885	SPBC29A3.05	SPCC1919.13c	vps71	SPCC1919.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526972	2540322	2539319	276852	275885	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC1919.13c	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC1919.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526973	2540219	2539319	276752	275885	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC1919.13c	hip1	SPCC1919.13c	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526974	2540220	2539319	276753	275885	SPBC337.03	SPCC1919.13c	rhn1	SPCC1919.13c	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.7104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526975	2540929	2539319	277445	275885	SPBC354.03	SPCC1919.13c	swd3	SPCC1919.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526976	2540968	2539319	277484	275885	SPBC3H7.07c	SPCC1919.13c	ser2	SPCC1919.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526977	2540825	2539319	277343	275885	SPBC428.08c	SPCC1919.13c	clr4	SPCC1919.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526978	2540821	2539319	277339	275885	SPBC800.03	SPCC1919.13c	clr3	SPCC1919.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526979	2541208	2539319	277722	275885	SPBC887.04c	SPCC1919.13c	lub1	SPCC1919.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526980	2541220	2539319	277734	275885	SPBC8D2.04	SPCC1919.13c	hht2	SPCC1919.13c	h3.2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526981	2541284	2539319	277797	275885	SPBC947.08c	SPCC1919.13c	hip4	SPCC1919.13c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526982	2541337	2539319	277848	275885	SPBP35G2.13c	SPCC1919.13c	swc2	SPCC1919.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526983	2539050	2539319	275623	275885	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC1919.13c	rik1	SPCC1919.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.52	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526984	2538930	2539319	275506	275885	SPCC188.13c	SPCC1919.13c	dcr1	SPCC1919.13c	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526985	2541746	2539209	278240	275779	SPAC20G4.04c	SPCC23B6.03c	hus1	tel1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526986	2543544	2539209	279961	275779	SPAC664.07c	SPCC23B6.03c	rad9	tel1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526987	2543289	2539209	279714	275779	SPAC9E9.08	SPCC23B6.03c	rad26	tel1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.7619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526988	2542239	2539098	278711	275670	SPAC18G6.02c	SPCC24B10.18	chp1	SPCC24B10.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526989	2542198	2539098	278673	275670	SPAC6F12.09	SPCC24B10.18	rdp1	SPCC24B10.18	rdr1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526990	2540893	2539098	277409	275670	SPBC543.10	SPCC24B10.18	get1	SPCC24B10.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526991	2538930	2539098	275506	275670	SPCC188.13c	SPCC24B10.18	dcr1	SPCC24B10.18	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526992	2542757	2538801	279207	275382	SPAC13C5.07	SPCC285.13c	mre11	nup60	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.4836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526993	2542207	2538801	278682	275382	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC285.13c	ddb1	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526994	2542568	2538801	279024	275382	SPAC1952.02	SPCC285.13c	tma23	nup60	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526995	2542007	2538801	278490	275382	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC285.13c	rad57	nup60	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.2606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526996	2541871	2538801	278361	275382	SPAC22F3.09c	SPCC285.13c	res2	nup60	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526997	2542036	2538801	278518	275382	SPAC23A1.19c	SPCC285.13c	hrq1	nup60	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526998	2541776	2538801	278270	275382	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC285.13c	swd1	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
526999	2541531	2538801	278031	275382	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC285.13c	fft3	nup60	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527000	2543384	2538801	279806	275382	SPAC637.06	SPCC285.13c	gmh5	nup60	SPAC637.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527001	2543372	2538801	279794	275382	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC285.13c	ase1	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.0511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527002	2539926	2538801	276470	275382	SPBC14F5.13c	SPCC285.13c	pho8	nup60	SPBC14F5.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527003	2539911	2538801	276456	275382	SPBC15D4.10c	SPCC285.13c	amo1	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527004	2540788	2538801	277307	275382	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC285.13c	swd2	nup60	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527005	2540787	2538801	277306	275382	SPBC1921.07c	SPCC285.13c	sgf29	nup60	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527006	2540352	2538801	276881	275382	SPBC215.03c	SPCC285.13c	csn1	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527007	2540686	2538801	277211	275382	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC285.13c	bdc1	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527008	2540317	2538801	276847	275382	SPBC24C6.05	SPCC285.13c	sec28	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527009	2540436	2538801	276964	275382	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC285.13c	ngg1	nup60	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527010	2540353	2538801	276882	275382	SPBC2F12.12c	SPCC285.13c	cay1	nup60	SPBC2F12.12c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527011	2540322	2538801	276852	275382	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC285.13c	SPBC31F10.10c	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527012	2540219	2538801	276752	275382	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC285.13c	hip1	nup60	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527013	2540995	2538801	277511	275382	SPBC337.16	SPCC285.13c	cho1	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527014	2540929	2538801	277445	275382	SPBC354.03	SPCC285.13c	swd3	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527015	2540967	2538801	277483	275382	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC285.13c	SPBC36B7.08c	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527016	2540968	2538801	277484	275382	SPBC3H7.07c	SPCC285.13c	ser2	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527017	2541284	2538801	277797	275382	SPBC947.08c	SPCC285.13c	hip4	nup60	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527018	2538906	2538801	275483	275382	SPCC1259.03	SPCC285.13c	rpa12	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527019	2542318	2539215	278784	275785	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC285.16c	cph1	msh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.13	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527020	2542032	2539215	278514	275785	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC285.16c	pnk1	msh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527021	2541672	2539215	278168	275785	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC285.16c	lsk1	msh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527022	2543118	2539215	279550	275785	SPAC3G6.11	SPCC285.16c	chl1	msh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527023	2541633	2539215	278129	275785	SPAC664.01c	SPCC285.16c	swi6	msh6	SPAC824.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527024	2543240	2539215	279668	275785	SPAC694.06c	SPCC285.16c	mrc1	msh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.6531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527025	2539733	2539215	276285	275785	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC285.16c	pab2	msh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527026	2540115	2539215	276652	275785	SPBC1778.02	SPCC285.16c	rap1	msh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527027	2540825	2539215	277343	275785	SPBC428.08c	SPCC285.16c	clr4	msh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527028	2540735	2539215	277258	275785	SPBC83.03c	SPCC285.16c	tas3	msh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.7977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527029	2541270	2539215	277784	275785	SPBC902.02c	SPCC285.16c	ctf18	msh6	chl12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527030	2542311	2539310	278777	275877	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC285.17	dad1	spp27	-	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527031	2542278	2539310	278747	275877	SPAC17G8.07	SPCC285.17	yaf9	spp27	-	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527032	2542519	2539310	278977	275877	SPAC19G12.08	SPCC285.17	scs7	spp27	-	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527033	2539700	2539310	276253	275877	SPBC1685.15c	SPCC285.17	klp6	spp27	SPBC649.01c|sot2	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527034	2540353	2539310	276882	275877	SPBC2F12.12c	SPCC285.17	cay1	spp27	SPBC2F12.12c	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527035	2540967	2539310	277483	275877	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC285.17	SPBC36B7.08c	spp27	-	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527036	2538906	2539310	275483	275877	SPCC1259.03	SPCC285.17	rpa12	spp27	-	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527037	2543263	2538762	279691	275345	SPAC1002.15c	SPCC306.04c	med6	set1	pmc5	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527038	2541536	2538762	278036	275345	SPAC1071.02	SPCC306.04c	mms19	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.1863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527039	3361561	2538762	280637	275345	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC306.04c	swr1	set1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527040	2542757	2538762	279207	275345	SPAC13C5.07	SPCC306.04c	mre11	set1	rad32	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527041	2541650	2538762	278146	275345	SPAC14C4.12c	SPCC306.04c	laf1	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527042	5802929	2538762	858067	275345	SPAC1556.08c	SPCC306.04c	cbs2	set1	SPAC1F12.01c	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527043	2542300	2538762	278767	275345	SPAC1687.22c	SPCC306.04c	puf3	set1	SPAC222.02c	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527044	2542311	2538762	278777	275345	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC306.04c	dad1	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527045	2542349	2538762	278814	275345	SPAC1782.05	SPCC306.04c	ypa2	set1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.9867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527046	2542277	2538762	278746	275345	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC306.04c	dbr1	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527047	2542168	2538762	278643	275345	SPAC17A5.16	SPCC306.04c	ftp105	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527048	2542421	2538762	278884	275345	SPAC17G8.05	SPCC306.04c	med20	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527049	2542278	2538762	278747	275345	SPAC17G8.07	SPCC306.04c	yaf9	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.8753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527050	2542170	2538762	278645	275345	SPAC17G8.13c	SPCC306.04c	mst2	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527051	2542418	2538762	278881	275345	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC306.04c	dad2	set1	hos2	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527052	2542123	2538762	278599	275345	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC306.04c	mal3	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.1454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527053	2542513	2538762	278971	275345	SPAC1952.05	SPCC306.04c	gcn5	set1	kat2	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527054	2542555	2538762	279012	275345	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC306.04c	SPAC1952.06c	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527055	2542540	2538762	278997	275345	SPAC19D5.06c	SPCC306.04c	din1	set1	rai1	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527056	2542519	2538762	278977	275345	SPAC19G12.08	SPCC306.04c	scs7	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527057	2542541	2538762	278998	275345	SPAC1B3.03c	SPCC306.04c	wis2	set1	cyp5	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527058	2542126	2538762	278602	275345	SPAC1B3.05	SPCC306.04c	not3	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527059	2542007	2538762	278490	275345	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC306.04c	rad57	set1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527060	2542831	2538762	279278	275345	SPAC20H4.08	SPCC306.04c	whi2	set1	SPAC20H4.08|SPAC145.02	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527061	2542023	2538762	278506	275345	SPAC20H4.10	SPCC306.04c	ufd2	set1	SPAC145.04	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527062	2541899	2538762	278389	275345	SPAC22E12.11c	SPCC306.04c	set3	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527063	2541786	2538762	278278	275345	SPAC22F3.08c	SPCC306.04c	rok1	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527064	2541871	2538762	278361	275345	SPAC22F3.09c	SPCC306.04c	res2	set1	mcs1|pct1	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527065	2541496	2538762	277998	275345	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC306.04c	arp42	set1	arp4	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.4198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527066	2541531	2538762	278031	275345	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC306.04c	fft3	set1	snf2SR	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.1263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527067	2541672	2538762	278168	275345	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC306.04c	lsk1	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527068	2541889	2538762	278379	275345	SPAC2F7.03c	SPCC306.04c	pom1	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527069	2543190	2538762	279619	275345	SPAC31F12.01	SPCC306.04c	zds1	set1	SPAC637.14|mug88	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527070	2542592	2538762	279047	275345	SPAC328.01c	SPCC306.04c	msn5	set1	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527071	2541710	2538762	278205	275345	SPAC343.11c	SPCC306.04c	msc1	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527072	2543044	2538762	279479	275345	SPAC3C7.12	SPCC306.04c	tip1	set1	noc1	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527073	2543064	2538762	279497	275345	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC306.04c	hrp3	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-18.092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527074	2543443	2538762	279863	275345	SPAC3H1.12c	SPCC306.04c	snt2	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527075	2543616	2538762	280030	275345	SPAC4A8.09c	SPCC306.04c	cwf21	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.4086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527076	2543619	2538762	280033	275345	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC306.04c	ypa1	set1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527077	2543516	2538762	279934	275345	SPAC4F10.11	SPCC306.04c	spn1	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527078	2543580	2538762	279995	275345	SPAC644.14c	SPCC306.04c	rad51	set1	rhp51	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.7562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527079	2543563	2538762	279979	275345	SPAC664.02c	SPCC306.04c	arp8	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-19.1512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527080	2542198	2538762	278673	275345	SPAC6F12.09	SPCC306.04c	rdp1	set1	rdr1	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527081	2542845	2538762	279291	275345	SPAC824.04	SPCC306.04c	SPAC824.04	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527082	2542102	2538762	278578	275345	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC306.04c	spc34	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527083	2542329	2538762	278795	275345	SPAC9G1.10c	SPCC306.04c	SPAC9G1.10c	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527084	2542192	2538762	278667	275345	SPAC9G1.12	SPCC306.04c	cpd1	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527085	2543387	2538762	279809	275345	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC306.04c	mcl1	set1	slr3	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527086	2539604	2538762	276162	275345	SPBC1105.14	SPCC306.04c	rsv2	set1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527087	2539930	2538762	276474	275345	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC306.04c	reb1	set1	SPBC660.01c	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.6739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527088	2539668	2538762	276223	275345	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC306.04c	pht1	set1	pi001	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.2049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527089	2539857	2538762	276404	275345	SPBC1604.20c	SPCC306.04c	tea2	set1	klp4	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.6986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527090	2539700	2538762	276253	275345	SPBC1685.15c	SPCC306.04c	klp6	set1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527091	2540154	2538762	276690	275345	SPBC16C6.05	SPCC306.04c	SPBC16C6.05	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527092	2540067	2538762	276605	275345	SPBC16H5.05c	SPCC306.04c	cyp7	set1	cwf27	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527093	2539925	2538762	276469	275345	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC306.04c	SPBC16H5.13	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.5575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527094	2539953	2538762	276497	275345	SPBC1709.11c	SPCC306.04c	png2	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527095	2539999	2538762	276543	275345	SPBC1734.15	SPCC306.04c	rsc4	set1	brd1	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.3335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527096	2540115	2538762	276652	275345	SPBC1778.02	SPCC306.04c	rap1	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527097	2540077	2538762	276615	275345	SPBC17D11.04c	SPCC306.04c	nto1	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.1777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527098	2539714	2538762	276267	275345	SPBC1861.07	SPCC306.04c	SPBC1861.07	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.4872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527099	2540832	2538762	277350	275345	SPBC18H10.05	SPCC306.04c	SPBC18H10.05	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527100	2540837	2538762	277355	275345	SPBC18H10.08c	SPCC306.04c	ubp4	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.3779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527101	2540787	2538762	277306	275345	SPBC1921.07c	SPCC306.04c	sgf29	set1	SPBC21D10.13	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527102	2540686	2538762	277211	275345	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC306.04c	bdc1	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-23.2019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527103	2540531	2538762	277059	275345	SPBC23E6.08	SPCC306.04c	sat1	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527104	2540317	2538762	276847	275345	SPBC24C6.05	SPCC306.04c	sec28	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.6183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527105	2540498	2538762	277026	275345	SPBC27.02c	SPCC306.04c	ask1	set1	mug181	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.2153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527106	2540436	2538762	276964	275345	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC306.04c	ngg1	set1	ada3|kap1	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527107	2540346	2538762	276875	275345	SPBC2F12.03c	SPCC306.04c	ebs1	set1	SPBC2F12.03c	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527108	2540353	2538762	276882	275345	SPBC2F12.12c	SPCC306.04c	cay1	set1	SPBC2F12.12c	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.3065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527109	2540322	2538762	276852	275345	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC306.04c	SPBC31F10.10c	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527110	2540396	2538762	276924	275345	SPBC31F10.12	SPCC306.04c	tma20	set1	SPBC31F10.12	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527111	2540219	2538762	276752	275345	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC306.04c	hip1	set1	hir1	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.6711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527112	2540220	2538762	276753	275345	SPBC337.03	SPCC306.04c	rhn1	set1	SPBC337.03|iss4	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.2158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527113	2540967	2538762	277483	275345	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC306.04c	SPBC36B7.08c	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.8365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527114	2540749	2538762	277271	275345	SPBC4B4.03	SPCC306.04c	rsc1	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.8081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527115	2540999	2538762	277515	275345	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC306.04c	SPBC4B4.04	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.6439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527116	2540893	2538762	277409	275345	SPBC543.10	SPCC306.04c	get1	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527117	2541095	2538762	277610	275345	SPBC725.06c	SPCC306.04c	ppk31	set1	mug25	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527118	2540821	2538762	277339	275345	SPBC800.03	SPCC306.04c	clr3	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.2616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527119	2541284	2538762	277797	275345	SPBC947.08c	SPCC306.04c	hip4	set1	hpc2	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527120	2541349	2538762	277860	275345	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC306.04c	air1	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527121	2541378	2538762	277889	275345	SPBP8B7.21	SPCC306.04c	ubp3	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527122	2539050	2538762	275623	275345	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC306.04c	rik1	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527123	2538906	2538762	275483	275345	SPCC1259.03	SPCC306.04c	rpa12	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527124	2538946	2538762	275520	275345	SPCC162.11c	SPCC306.04c	SPCC162.11c	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527125	2539379	2538762	275945	275345	SPCC188.02	SPCC306.04c	par1	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527126	2539130	2538762	275702	275345	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC306.04c	amk2	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.6346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527127	2539319	2538762	275885	275345	SPCC1919.13c	SPCC306.04c	SPCC1919.13c	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527128	2538801	2538762	275382	275345	SPCC285.13c	SPCC306.04c	nup60	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527129	2542032	2538926	278514	275502	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC306.07c	pnk1	SPCC306.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527130	2540893	2538926	277409	275502	SPBC543.10	SPCC306.07c	get1	SPCC306.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527131	2543263	2538913	279691	275490	SPAC1002.15c	SPCC31H12.08c	med6	ccr4	pmc5	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527132	2541536	2538913	278036	275490	SPAC1071.02	SPCC31H12.08c	mms19	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.8252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527133	2542757	2538913	279207	275490	SPAC13C5.07	SPCC31H12.08c	mre11	ccr4	rad32	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.5454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527134	2541580	2538913	278077	275490	SPAC1687.05	SPCC31H12.08c	pli1	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527135	2542311	2538913	278777	275490	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC31H12.08c	dad1	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527136	2542318	2538913	278784	275490	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC31H12.08c	cph1	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527137	2542277	2538913	278746	275490	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC31H12.08c	dbr1	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.7035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527138	2542141	2538913	278617	275490	SPAC17C9.05c	SPCC31H12.08c	pmc3	ccr4	med27|prk1	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527139	2542421	2538913	278884	275490	SPAC17G8.05	SPCC31H12.08c	med20	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.2002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527140	2542278	2538913	278747	275490	SPAC17G8.07	SPCC31H12.08c	yaf9	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.0355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527141	2542207	2538913	278682	275490	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC31H12.08c	ddb1	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.5352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527142	2542418	2538913	278881	275490	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC31H12.08c	dad2	ccr4	hos2	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.1822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527143	2542239	2538913	278711	275490	SPAC18G6.02c	SPCC31H12.08c	chp1	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527144	2542513	2538913	278971	275490	SPAC1952.05	SPCC31H12.08c	gcn5	ccr4	kat2	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.2426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527145	2542558	2538913	279014	275490	SPAC1952.07	SPCC31H12.08c	rad1	ccr4	rad19	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527146	2542462	2538913	278923	275490	SPAC19B12.11c	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC19B12.11c	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527147	2542466	2538913	278927	275490	SPAC19E9.01c	SPCC31H12.08c	nup40	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527148	2542237	2538913	278709	275490	SPAC19E9.02	SPCC31H12.08c	fin1	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527149	2541746	2538913	278240	275490	SPAC20G4.04c	SPCC31H12.08c	hus1	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527150	2542007	2538913	278490	275490	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC31H12.08c	rad57	ccr4	rhp57|SPAC145.01	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.6406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527151	2542023	2538913	278506	275490	SPAC20H4.10	SPCC31H12.08c	ufd2	ccr4	SPAC145.04	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527152	2541899	2538913	278389	275490	SPAC22E12.11c	SPCC31H12.08c	set3	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527153	2542032	2538913	278514	275490	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC31H12.08c	pnk1	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527154	2541496	2538913	277998	275490	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC31H12.08c	arp42	ccr4	arp4	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.4051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527155	2541776	2538913	278270	275490	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC31H12.08c	swd1	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527156	2541531	2538913	278031	275490	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC31H12.08c	fft3	ccr4	snf2SR	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.0283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527157	2542701	2538913	279154	275490	SPAC26H5.05	SPCC31H12.08c	mga2	ccr4	SPAC26H5.05	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.2889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527158	2542094	2538913	278571	275490	SPAC29B12.06c	SPCC31H12.08c	rcd1	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527159	2543160	2538913	279591	275490	SPAC31A2.14	SPCC31H12.08c	bun107	ccr4	wdr48	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527160	2542592	2538913	279047	275490	SPAC328.01c	SPCC31H12.08c	msn5	ccr4	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527161	2541710	2538913	278205	275490	SPAC343.11c	SPCC31H12.08c	msc1	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527162	2541713	2538913	278208	275490	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC31H12.08c	atp11	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527163	2543452	2538913	279872	275490	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC31H12.08c	ssu72	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.5876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527164	2543616	2538913	280030	275490	SPAC4A8.09c	SPCC31H12.08c	cwf21	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527165	2543619	2538913	280033	275490	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC31H12.08c	ypa1	ccr4	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527166	2542571	2538913	279027	275490	SPAC589.02c	SPCC31H12.08c	med13	ccr4	spTrap240|srb9	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527167	2543426	2538913	279846	275490	SPAC631.02	SPCC31H12.08c	bdf2	ccr4	SPAC631.02|nrc1	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.4227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527168	2543384	2538913	279806	275490	SPAC637.06	SPCC31H12.08c	gmh5	ccr4	SPAC637.06	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527169	2543580	2538913	279995	275490	SPAC644.14c	SPCC31H12.08c	rad51	ccr4	rhp51	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.9606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527170	2541633	2538913	278129	275490	SPAC664.01c	SPCC31H12.08c	swi6	ccr4	SPAC824.10c	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527171	2543563	2538913	279979	275490	SPAC664.02c	SPCC31H12.08c	arp8	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.3996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527172	2543544	2538913	279961	275490	SPAC664.07c	SPCC31H12.08c	rad9	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527173	2543319	2538913	279743	275490	SPAC6B12.09	SPCC31H12.08c	trm10	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527174	2542198	2538913	278673	275490	SPAC6F12.09	SPCC31H12.08c	rdp1	ccr4	rdr1	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527175	2542845	2538913	279291	275490	SPAC824.04	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC824.04	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527176	2542102	2538913	278578	275490	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC31H12.08c	spc34	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.6004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527177	2543530	2538913	279948	275490	SPAC926.07c	SPCC31H12.08c	dlc2	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527178	2543289	2538913	279714	275490	SPAC9E9.08	SPCC31H12.08c	rad26	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527179	2543372	2538913	279794	275490	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC31H12.08c	ase1	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.1009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527180	2543387	2538913	279809	275490	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC31H12.08c	mcl1	ccr4	slr3	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527181	2543670	2538913	280084	275490	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPCC31H12.08c	eme1	ccr4	mms4|slx2	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.6757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527182	2539971	2538913	276515	275490	SPBC1105.04c	SPCC31H12.08c	cbp1	ccr4	abp1	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.1507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527183	2539604	2538913	276162	275490	SPBC1105.14	SPCC31H12.08c	rsv2	ccr4	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.35	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527184	2539668	2538913	276223	275490	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC31H12.08c	pht1	ccr4	pi001	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527185	2539812	2538913	276362	275490	SPBC1347.02	SPCC31H12.08c	fkbp39	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527186	2539667	2538913	276222	275490	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC31H12.08c	ash2	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-18.7438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527187	2539773	2538913	276324	275490	SPBC14F5.08	SPCC31H12.08c	med7	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527188	2539911	2538913	276456	275490	SPBC15D4.10c	SPCC31H12.08c	amo1	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527189	2539700	2538913	276253	275490	SPBC1685.15c	SPCC31H12.08c	klp6	ccr4	SPBC649.01c|sot2	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527190	2540154	2538913	276690	275490	SPBC16C6.05	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC16C6.05	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527191	2539733	2538913	276285	275490	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC31H12.08c	pab2	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527192	2539925	2538913	276469	275490	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC16H5.13	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.5995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527193	2540032	2538913	276575	275490	SPBC1703.14c	SPCC31H12.08c	top1	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.3367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527194	2539876	2538913	276422	275490	SPBC1734.07c	SPCC31H12.08c	trs8502	ccr4	SPBC1734.07c	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527195	2540788	2538913	277307	275490	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC31H12.08c	swd2	ccr4	swd2.1	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527196	2540787	2538913	277306	275490	SPBC1921.07c	SPCC31H12.08c	sgf29	ccr4	SPBC21D10.13	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527197	2540514	2538913	277042	275490	SPBC19F5.02c	SPCC31H12.08c	utp4	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527198	2540686	2538913	277211	275490	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC31H12.08c	bdc1	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527199	2540498	2538913	277026	275490	SPBC27.02c	SPCC31H12.08c	ask1	ccr4	mug181	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-20.759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527200	2540436	2538913	276964	275490	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC31H12.08c	ngg1	ccr4	ada3|kap1	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.5467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527201	2540348	2538913	276877	275490	SPBC29A10.05	SPCC31H12.08c	exo1	ccr4	mut2	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527202	2540512	2538913	277040	275490	SPBC29A3.05	SPCC31H12.08c	vps71	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527203	2540597	2538913	277123	275490	SPBC29A3.09c	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC29A3.09c	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527204	2540322	2538913	276852	275490	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC31F10.10c	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.6377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527205	2540396	2538913	276924	275490	SPBC31F10.12	SPCC31H12.08c	tma20	ccr4	SPBC31F10.12	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527206	2540995	2538913	277511	275490	SPBC337.16	SPCC31H12.08c	cho1	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527207	2540945	2538913	277461	275490	SPBC342.06c	SPCC31H12.08c	rtt109	ccr4	kat11	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527208	2540929	2538913	277445	275490	SPBC354.03	SPCC31H12.08c	swd3	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.0036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527209	2540968	2538913	277484	275490	SPBC3H7.07c	SPCC31H12.08c	ser2	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.9183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527210	2540825	2538913	277343	275490	SPBC428.08c	SPCC31H12.08c	clr4	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.8878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527211	2540999	2538913	277515	275490	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC4B4.04	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527212	2539847	2538913	276395	275490	SPBC530.14c	SPCC31H12.08c	dsk1	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.1151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527213	2540919	2538913	277435	275490	SPBC543.07	SPCC31H12.08c	pek1	ccr4	mkk1|skh1	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527214	2540893	2538913	277409	275490	SPBC543.10	SPCC31H12.08c	get1	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.2398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527215	2541088	2538913	277603	275490	SPBC609.05	SPCC31H12.08c	pob3	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.8551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527216	2541120	2538913	277635	275490	SPBC649.03	SPCC31H12.08c	rhp14	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527217	2541062	2538913	277577	275490	SPBC660.11	SPCC31H12.08c	tcg1	ccr4	mug187	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527218	2540829	2538913	277347	275490	SPBC800.09	SPCC31H12.08c	sum2	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527219	2540735	2538913	277258	275490	SPBC83.03c	SPCC31H12.08c	tas3	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527220	2541175	2538913	277689	275490	SPBC839.13c	SPCC31H12.08c	rpl1601	ccr4	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.8498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527221	2541208	2538913	277722	275490	SPBC887.04c	SPCC31H12.08c	lub1	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527222	2541349	2538913	277860	275490	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC31H12.08c	air1	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527223	2541337	2538913	277848	275490	SPBP35G2.13c	SPCC31H12.08c	swc2	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527224	2539050	2538913	275623	275490	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC31H12.08c	rik1	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527225	2539248	2538913	275818	275490	SPCC1739.03	SPCC31H12.08c	hrr1	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.0717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527226	2538966	2538913	275540	275490	SPCC18.10	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC18.10	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527227	2539145	2538913	275717	275490	SPCC18.11c	SPCC31H12.08c	sdc1	ccr4	dpy30	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527228	2539379	2538913	275945	275490	SPCC188.02	SPCC31H12.08c	par1	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527229	2538930	2538913	275506	275490	SPCC188.13c	SPCC31H12.08c	dcr1	ccr4	SPCC584.10c	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527230	2539319	2538913	275885	275490	SPCC1919.13c	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC1919.13c	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527231	2542558	2539094	279014	275666	SPAC1952.07	SPCC330.02	rad1	rhp7	rad19	SPCC613.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527232	2541746	2539094	278240	275666	SPAC20G4.04c	SPCC330.02	hus1	rhp7	-	SPCC613.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527233	2542007	2539094	278490	275666	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC330.02	rad57	rhp7	rhp57|SPAC145.01	SPCC613.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527234	2543544	2539094	279961	275666	SPAC664.07c	SPCC330.02	rad9	rhp7	-	SPCC613.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527235	2543670	2539094	280084	275666	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPCC330.02	eme1	rhp7	mms4|slx2	SPCC613.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527236	2539911	2539094	276456	275666	SPBC15D4.10c	SPCC330.02	amo1	rhp7	-	SPCC613.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527237	2540992	2539094	277508	275666	SPBC342.05	SPCC330.02	crb2	rhp7	rhp9	SPCC613.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527238	2541536	2539538	278036	276100	SPAC1071.02	SPCC364.06	mms19	nap1	-	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527239	2542318	2539538	278784	276100	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC364.06	cph1	nap1	-	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527240	2541531	2539538	278031	276100	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC364.06	fft3	nap1	snf2SR	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.2467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527241	2541614	2539538	278111	276100	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC364.06	elp3	nap1	kat9	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527242	2543619	2539538	280033	276100	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC364.06	ypa1	nap1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527243	2543341	2539538	279764	276100	SPAC8E11.07c	SPCC364.06	alp31	nap1	-	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527244	2543372	2539538	279794	276100	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC364.06	ase1	nap1	-	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.7853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527245	2539925	2539538	276469	276100	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC364.06	SPBC16H5.13	nap1	-	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527246	2540822	2539538	277340	276100	SPBC18E5.05c	SPCC364.06	elp5	nap1	iki1	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527247	2540531	2539538	277059	276100	SPBC23E6.08	SPCC364.06	sat1	nap1	-	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527248	2540219	2539538	276752	276100	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC364.06	hip1	nap1	hir1	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527249	2540967	2539538	277483	276100	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC364.06	SPBC36B7.08c	nap1	-	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527250	2541088	2539538	277603	276100	SPBC609.05	SPCC364.06	pob3	nap1	-	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527251	2541284	2539538	277797	276100	SPBC947.08c	SPCC364.06	hip4	nap1	hpc2	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527252	2541349	2539538	277860	276100	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC364.06	air1	nap1	-	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527253	2540121	2538965	276658	275539	SPBC119.14	SPCC417.09c	rti1	SPCC417.09c	rad22B	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527254	2542519	2539545	278977	276106	SPAC19G12.08	SPCC4B3.12	scs7	set9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527255	2542007	2539545	278490	276106	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC4B3.12	rad57	set9	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527256	2542036	2539545	278518	276106	SPAC23A1.19c	SPCC4B3.12	hrq1	set9	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.6867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527257	2543580	2539545	279995	276106	SPAC644.14c	SPCC4B3.12	rad51	set9	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527258	2539911	2539545	276456	276106	SPBC15D4.10c	SPCC4B3.12	amo1	set9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527259	3361323	2539545	280399	276106	SPBC30D10.04	SPCC4B3.12	swi3	set9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527260	2541120	2539545	277635	276106	SPBC649.03	SPCC4B3.12	rhp14	set9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527261	2541536	2539375	278036	275941	SPAC1071.02	SPCC4G3.11	mms19	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.6733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527262	2541628	2539375	278124	275941	SPAC110.02	SPCC4G3.11	pds5	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.0168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527263	3361456	2539375	280532	275941	SPAC1142.03c	SPCC4G3.11	swi2	mug154	SPAC17G6.20c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527264	2542757	2539375	279207	275941	SPAC13C5.07	SPCC4G3.11	mre11	mug154	rad32	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.4461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527265	5802929	2539375	858067	275941	SPAC1556.08c	SPCC4G3.11	cbs2	mug154	SPAC1F12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527266	2541580	2539375	278077	275941	SPAC1687.05	SPCC4G3.11	pli1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527267	2542363	2539375	278827	275941	SPAC1783.05	SPCC4G3.11	hrp1	mug154	chd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527268	2542440	2539375	278902	275941	SPAC17A2.12	SPCC4G3.11	rrp1	mug154	SPAC17A2.12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527269	2542277	2539375	278746	275941	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC4G3.11	dbr1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527270	2542278	2539375	278747	275941	SPAC17G8.07	SPCC4G3.11	yaf9	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527271	2542207	2539375	278682	275941	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC4G3.11	ddb1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527272	2542418	2539375	278881	275941	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC4G3.11	dad2	mug154	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527273	2542466	2539375	278927	275941	SPAC19E9.01c	SPCC4G3.11	nup40	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527274	2542519	2539375	278977	275941	SPAC19G12.08	SPCC4G3.11	scs7	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527275	2541468	2539375	277970	275941	SPAC1F5.09c	SPCC4G3.11	shk2	mug154	pak2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.34	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527276	2541746	2539375	278240	275941	SPAC20G4.04c	SPCC4G3.11	hus1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527277	2542007	2539375	278490	275941	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC4G3.11	rad57	mug154	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527278	3361533	2539375	280609	275941	SPAC222.15	SPCC4G3.11	meu13	mug154	SPAC821.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527279	2542032	2539375	278514	275941	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC4G3.11	pnk1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527280	2541496	2539375	277998	275941	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC4G3.11	arp42	mug154	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.4261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527281	2541776	2539375	278270	275941	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC4G3.11	swd1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.0986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527282	2541531	2539375	278031	275941	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC4G3.11	fft3	mug154	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527283	2541614	2539375	278111	275941	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC4G3.11	elp3	mug154	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.6838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527284	2542094	2539375	278571	275941	SPAC29B12.06c	SPCC4G3.11	rcd1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527285	2541889	2539375	278379	275941	SPAC2F7.03c	SPCC4G3.11	pom1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527286	2542592	2539375	279047	275941	SPAC328.01c	SPCC4G3.11	msn5	mug154	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527287	2543443	2539375	279863	275941	SPAC3H1.12c	SPCC4G3.11	snt2	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527288	2543577	2539375	279992	275941	SPAC4H3.05	SPCC4G3.11	srs2	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527289	2543426	2539375	279846	275941	SPAC631.02	SPCC4G3.11	bdf2	mug154	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527290	2543580	2539375	279995	275941	SPAC644.14c	SPCC4G3.11	rad51	mug154	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527291	2543240	2539375	279668	275941	SPAC694.06c	SPCC4G3.11	mrc1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527292	2542198	2539375	278673	275941	SPAC6F12.09	SPCC4G3.11	rdp1	mug154	rdr1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527293	2541819	2539375	278310	275941	SPAC6G9.08	SPCC4G3.11	ubp6	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527294	2542845	2539375	279291	275941	SPAC824.04	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC824.04	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527295	2543289	2539375	279714	275941	SPAC9E9.08	SPCC4G3.11	rad26	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527296	2543670	2539375	280084	275941	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPCC4G3.11	eme1	mug154	mms4|slx2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.2087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527297	2539971	2539375	276515	275941	SPBC1105.04c	SPCC4G3.11	cbp1	mug154	abp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527298	2539604	2539375	276162	275941	SPBC1105.14	SPCC4G3.11	rsv2	mug154	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527299	2539812	2539375	276362	275941	SPBC1347.02	SPCC4G3.11	fkbp39	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.7232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527300	2539667	2539375	276222	275941	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC4G3.11	ash2	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.5294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527301	2540032	2539375	276575	275941	SPBC1703.14c	SPCC4G3.11	top1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527302	2539999	2539375	276543	275941	SPBC1734.15	SPCC4G3.11	rsc4	mug154	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527303	2540788	2539375	277307	275941	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC4G3.11	swd2	mug154	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527304	2540352	2539375	276881	275941	SPBC215.03c	SPCC4G3.11	csn1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527305	2540686	2539375	277211	275941	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC4G3.11	bdc1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527306	2540317	2539375	276847	275941	SPBC24C6.05	SPCC4G3.11	sec28	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.1401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527307	2540498	2539375	277026	275941	SPBC27.02c	SPCC4G3.11	ask1	mug154	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527308	2540492	2539375	277020	275941	SPBC2D10.13	SPCC4G3.11	est1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527309	2540353	2539375	276882	275941	SPBC2F12.12c	SPCC4G3.11	cay1	mug154	SPBC2F12.12c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527310	3361323	2539375	280399	275941	SPBC30D10.04	SPCC4G3.11	swi3	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527311	2540219	2539375	276752	275941	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC4G3.11	hip1	mug154	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.3119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527312	2540995	2539375	277511	275941	SPBC337.16	SPCC4G3.11	cho1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.1505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527313	2540929	2539375	277445	275941	SPBC354.03	SPCC4G3.11	swd3	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.1837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527314	2541017	2539375	277532	275941	SPBC36.07	SPCC4G3.11	elp1	mug154	iki3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.2064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527315	2540320	2539375	276850	275941	SPBC3D6.04c	SPCC4G3.11	mad1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527316	2540979	2539375	277495	275941	SPBC3H7.10	SPCC4G3.11	elp6	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.6581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527317	2540825	2539375	277343	275941	SPBC428.08c	SPCC4G3.11	clr4	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527318	2540749	2539375	277271	275941	SPBC4B4.03	SPCC4G3.11	rsc1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.2653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527319	2540893	2539375	277409	275941	SPBC543.10	SPCC4G3.11	get1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527320	2540260	2539375	276791	275941	SPBC577.03c	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC577.03c	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527321	2541088	2539375	277603	275941	SPBC609.05	SPCC4G3.11	pob3	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527322	2541120	2539375	277635	275941	SPBC649.03	SPCC4G3.11	rhp14	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527323	2540821	2539375	277339	275941	SPBC800.03	SPCC4G3.11	clr3	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527324	2541175	2539375	277689	275941	SPBC839.13c	SPCC4G3.11	rpl1601	mug154	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.9584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527325	2541208	2539375	277722	275941	SPBC887.04c	SPCC4G3.11	lub1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527326	2541284	2539375	277797	275941	SPBC947.08c	SPCC4G3.11	hip4	mug154	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.8073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527327	2538987	2539375	275561	275941	SPCC11E10.06c	SPCC4G3.11	elp4	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.3548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527328	2539050	2539375	275623	275941	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC4G3.11	rik1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527329	2538906	2539375	275483	275941	SPCC1259.03	SPCC4G3.11	rpa12	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.6028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527330	2538955	2539375	275529	275941	SPCC1450.02	SPCC4G3.11	bdf1	mug154	SPCC191.13|brf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527331	2539379	2539375	275945	275941	SPCC188.02	SPCC4G3.11	par1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527332	2538930	2539375	275506	275941	SPCC188.13c	SPCC4G3.11	dcr1	mug154	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527333	2539130	2539375	275702	275941	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC4G3.11	amk2	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527334	2538801	2539375	275382	275941	SPCC285.13c	SPCC4G3.11	nup60	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.9628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527335	2542278	2538778	278747	275359	SPAC17G8.07	SPCC4G3.15c	yaf9	not2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527336	2542207	2538778	278682	275359	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC4G3.15c	ddb1	not2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527337	2542418	2538778	278881	275359	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC4G3.15c	dad2	not2	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527338	2541941	2538778	278428	275359	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC4G3.15c	tfs1	not2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527339	2541496	2538778	277998	275359	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC4G3.15c	arp42	not2	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527340	2541789	2538778	278281	275359	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC4G3.15c	iwr1	not2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527341	2542701	2538778	279154	275359	SPAC26H5.05	SPCC4G3.15c	mga2	not2	SPAC26H5.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.2408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527342	2542094	2538778	278571	275359	SPAC29B12.06c	SPCC4G3.15c	rcd1	not2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527343	2541889	2538778	278379	275359	SPAC2F7.03c	SPCC4G3.15c	pom1	not2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527344	2541801	2538778	278292	275359	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC4G3.15c	snf5	not2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527345	2543190	2538778	279619	275359	SPAC31F12.01	SPCC4G3.15c	zds1	not2	SPAC637.14|mug88	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527346	2543452	2538778	279872	275359	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC4G3.15c	ssu72	not2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527347	2543619	2538778	280033	275359	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC4G3.15c	ypa1	not2	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527348	2542102	2538778	278578	275359	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC4G3.15c	spc34	not2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527349	2543372	2538778	279794	275359	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC4G3.15c	ase1	not2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.7382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527350	2543670	2538778	280084	275359	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPCC4G3.15c	eme1	not2	mms4|slx2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527351	2539920	2538778	276464	275359	SPBC119.08	SPCC4G3.15c	pmk1	not2	spm1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527352	2539668	2538778	276223	275359	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC4G3.15c	pht1	not2	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.8617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527353	2539960	2538778	276504	275359	SPBC15D4.15	SPCC4G3.15c	pho2	not2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527354	2539733	2538778	276285	275359	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC4G3.15c	pab2	not2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527355	2539925	2538778	276469	275359	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC4G3.15c	SPBC16H5.13	not2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527356	2540352	2538778	276881	275359	SPBC215.03c	SPCC4G3.15c	csn1	not2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527357	2540317	2538778	276847	275359	SPBC24C6.05	SPCC4G3.15c	sec28	not2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527358	2540498	2538778	277026	275359	SPBC27.02c	SPCC4G3.15c	ask1	not2	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527359	2540512	2538778	277040	275359	SPBC29A3.05	SPCC4G3.15c	vps71	not2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527360	2540396	2538778	276924	275359	SPBC31F10.12	SPCC4G3.15c	tma20	not2	SPBC31F10.12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527361	2540995	2538778	277511	275359	SPBC337.16	SPCC4G3.15c	cho1	not2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527362	2540968	2538778	277484	275359	SPBC3H7.07c	SPCC4G3.15c	ser2	not2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527363	2539847	2538778	276395	275359	SPBC530.14c	SPCC4G3.15c	dsk1	not2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527364	2540919	2538778	277435	275359	SPBC543.07	SPCC4G3.15c	pek1	not2	mkk1|skh1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527365	2540893	2538778	277409	275359	SPBC543.10	SPCC4G3.15c	get1	not2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527366	2540913	2538778	277429	275359	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC4G3.15c	SPBC56F2.08c	not2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527367	2541088	2538778	277603	275359	SPBC609.05	SPCC4G3.15c	pob3	not2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.3472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527368	2541208	2538778	277722	275359	SPBC887.04c	SPCC4G3.15c	lub1	not2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527369	2538906	2538778	275483	275359	SPCC1259.03	SPCC4G3.15c	rpa12	not2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.2516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527370	2542318	2539309	278784	275876	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC4G3.19	cph1	alp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527371	2542278	2539309	278747	275876	SPAC17G8.07	SPCC4G3.19	yaf9	alp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.1557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527372	2542418	2539309	278881	275876	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC4G3.19	dad2	alp16	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.1316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527373	2542237	2539309	278709	275876	SPAC19E9.02	SPCC4G3.19	fin1	alp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.6708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527374	2541710	2539309	278205	275876	SPAC343.11c	SPCC4G3.19	msc1	alp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527375	2543106	2539309	279538	275876	SPAC3A11.13	SPCC4G3.19	SPAC3A11.13	alp16	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527376	2543378	2539309	279800	275876	SPAC3H8.07c	SPCC4G3.19	pac10	alp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527377	2543426	2539309	279846	275876	SPAC631.02	SPCC4G3.19	bdf2	alp16	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527378	2542102	2539309	278578	275876	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC4G3.19	spc34	alp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527379	2540060	2539309	276598	275876	SPBC106.01	SPCC4G3.19	mph1	alp16	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527380	2539668	2539309	276223	275876	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC4G3.19	pht1	alp16	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.0508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527381	2539700	2539309	276253	275876	SPBC1685.15c	SPCC4G3.19	klp6	alp16	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527382	2540498	2539309	277026	275876	SPBC27.02c	SPCC4G3.19	ask1	alp16	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.6102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527383	2540893	2539309	277409	275876	SPBC543.10	SPCC4G3.19	get1	alp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527384	2541270	2539309	277784	275876	SPBC902.02c	SPCC4G3.19	ctf18	alp16	chl12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527385	2541337	2539309	277848	275876	SPBP35G2.13c	SPCC4G3.19	swc2	alp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527386	2541578	2538765	278075	275348	SPAC25B8.05	SPCC548.04	deg1	urm1	SPAC25B8.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527387	2540320	2538765	276850	275348	SPBC3D6.04c	SPCC548.04	mad1	urm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527388	2542418	2539314	278881	275880	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC548.05c	dad2	dbl5	hos2	SPCC548.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527389	2542102	2539314	278578	275880	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC548.05c	spc34	dbl5	-	SPCC548.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527390	2540498	2539314	277026	275880	SPBC27.02c	SPCC548.05c	ask1	dbl5	mug181	SPCC548.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.79	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527391	2540353	2539314	276882	275880	SPBC2F12.12c	SPCC548.05c	cay1	dbl5	SPBC2F12.12c	SPCC548.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527392	2540967	2539314	277483	275880	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC548.05c	SPBC36B7.08c	dbl5	-	SPCC548.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527393	2541088	2539314	277603	275880	SPBC609.05	SPCC548.05c	pob3	dbl5	-	SPCC548.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527394	2541642	2538841	278138	275422	SPAC10F6.05c	SPCC550.03c	ubc6	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527395	2542363	2538841	278827	275422	SPAC1783.05	SPCC550.03c	hrp1	SPCC550.03c	chd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527396	2542278	2538841	278747	275422	SPAC17G8.07	SPCC550.03c	yaf9	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527397	2541710	2538841	278205	275422	SPAC343.11c	SPCC550.03c	msc1	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527398	2543516	2538841	279934	275422	SPAC4F10.11	SPCC550.03c	spn1	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527399	2542891	2538841	279335	275422	SPAC6F12.12	SPCC550.03c	par2	SPCC550.03c	pbp2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527400	2539651	2538841	276206	275422	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC550.03c	srb11	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527401	2539673	2538841	276228	275422	SPBC13G1.10c	SPCC550.03c	mug81	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.6134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527402	2540209	2538841	276742	275422	SPBC1604.10	SPCC550.03c	srb7	SPCC550.03c	med21	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527403	2539733	2538841	276285	275422	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC550.03c	pab2	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527404	2540067	2538841	276605	275422	SPBC16H5.05c	SPCC550.03c	cyp7	SPCC550.03c	cwf27	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527405	2539925	2538841	276469	275422	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC550.03c	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527406	2540115	2538841	276652	275422	SPBC1778.02	SPCC550.03c	rap1	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527407	2539900	2538841	276446	275422	SPBC17D11.02c	SPCC550.03c	hrd1	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527408	2540788	2538841	277307	275422	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC550.03c	swd2	SPCC550.03c	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527409	2540322	2538841	276852	275422	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC550.03c	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527410	2540219	2538841	276752	275422	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC550.03c	hip1	SPCC550.03c	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.9683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527411	2540995	2538841	277511	275422	SPBC337.16	SPCC550.03c	cho1	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527412	2540913	2538841	277429	275422	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC550.03c	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527413	2540829	2538841	277347	275422	SPBC800.09	SPCC550.03c	sum2	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.4823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527414	2541284	2538841	277797	275422	SPBC947.08c	SPCC550.03c	hip4	SPCC550.03c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.4944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527415	2538955	2538841	275529	275422	SPCC1450.02	SPCC550.03c	bdf1	SPCC550.03c	SPCC191.13|brf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527416	2538762	2538841	275345	275422	SPCC306.04c	SPCC550.03c	set1	SPCC550.03c	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527417	2541536	2539564	278036	276125	SPAC1071.02	SPCC550.12	mms19	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527418	2542318	2539564	278784	276125	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC550.12	cph1	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.6302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527419	2542418	2539564	278881	276125	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC550.12	dad2	arp6	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527420	2542239	2539564	278711	276125	SPAC18G6.02c	SPCC550.12	chp1	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527421	2542126	2539564	278602	276125	SPAC1B3.05	SPCC550.12	not3	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527422	2541899	2539564	278389	276125	SPAC22E12.11c	SPCC550.12	set3	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527423	2541786	2539564	278278	276125	SPAC22F3.08c	SPCC550.12	rok1	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527424	2542036	2539564	278518	276125	SPAC23A1.19c	SPCC550.12	hrq1	arp6	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527425	2541496	2539564	277998	276125	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC550.12	arp42	arp6	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527426	2541531	2539564	278031	276125	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC550.12	fft3	arp6	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-21.8689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527427	2541672	2539564	278168	276125	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC550.12	lsk1	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527428	2541801	2539564	278292	276125	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC550.12	snf5	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.6916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527429	2543452	2539564	279872	276125	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC550.12	ssu72	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-19.2038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527430	2543643	2539564	280057	276125	SPAC3G9.07c	SPCC550.12	hos2	arp6	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.6358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527431	2543443	2539564	279863	276125	SPAC3H1.12c	SPCC550.12	snt2	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-23.3016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527432	2543563	2539564	279979	276125	SPAC664.02c	SPCC550.12	arp8	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.3685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527433	2542102	2539564	278578	276125	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC550.12	spc34	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527434	2543387	2539564	279809	276125	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC550.12	mcl1	arp6	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.8274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527435	2539773	2539564	276324	276125	SPBC14F5.08	SPCC550.12	med7	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.2999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527436	2539733	2539564	276285	276125	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC550.12	pab2	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527437	2539999	2539564	276543	276125	SPBC1734.15	SPCC550.12	rsc4	arp6	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527438	2539714	2539564	276267	276125	SPBC1861.07	SPCC550.12	SPBC1861.07	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527439	2540822	2539564	277340	276125	SPBC18E5.05c	SPCC550.12	elp5	arp6	iki1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527440	2540612	2539564	277138	276125	SPBC1D7.05	SPCC550.12	byr2	arp6	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.6687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527441	2540669	2539564	277194	276125	SPBC215.13	SPCC550.12	SPBC215.13	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527442	2540498	2539564	277026	276125	SPBC27.02c	SPCC550.12	ask1	arp6	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527443	2540322	2539564	276852	276125	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC550.12	SPBC31F10.10c	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527444	2540967	2539564	277483	276125	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC550.12	SPBC36B7.08c	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527445	2540825	2539564	277343	276125	SPBC428.08c	SPCC550.12	clr4	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527446	2541088	2539564	277603	276125	SPBC609.05	SPCC550.12	pob3	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-25.4033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527447	2541062	2539564	277577	276125	SPBC660.11	SPCC550.12	tcg1	arp6	mug187	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527448	2540735	2539564	277258	276125	SPBC83.03c	SPCC550.12	tas3	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527449	2541284	2539564	277797	276125	SPBC947.08c	SPCC550.12	hip4	arp6	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527450	2541361	2539564	277872	276125	SPBP8B7.10c	SPCC550.12	utp16	arp6	SPBP8B7.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527451	2538701	2539564	275286	276125	SPCC1235.09	SPCC550.12	hif2	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.1725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527452	2539366	2539564	275932	276125	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC550.12	pef1	arp6	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527453	2539145	2539564	275717	276125	SPCC18.11c	SPCC550.12	sdc1	arp6	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-20.2326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527454	2539319	2539564	275885	276125	SPCC1919.13c	SPCC550.12	SPCC1919.13c	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527455	2538913	2539564	275490	276125	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC550.12	ccr4	arp6	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.0196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527456	2542277	2539563	278746	276124	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC550.15c	dbr1	SPCC550.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527457	2539651	2539563	276206	276124	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC550.15c	srb11	SPCC550.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527458	2539733	2539563	276285	276124	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC550.15c	pab2	SPCC550.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527459	2540968	2539563	277484	276124	SPBC3H7.07c	SPCC550.15c	ser2	SPCC550.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527460	2538913	2539563	275490	276124	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC550.15c	ccr4	SPCC550.15c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527461	2539375	2539563	275941	276124	SPCC4G3.11	SPCC550.15c	mug154	SPCC550.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527462	2543263	2539444	279691	276007	SPAC1002.15c	SPCC576.13	med6	swc5	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527463	2541536	2539444	278036	276007	SPAC1071.02	SPCC576.13	mms19	swc5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527464	2542318	2539444	278784	276007	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC576.13	cph1	swc5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.12	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527465	2542421	2539444	278884	276007	SPAC17G8.05	SPCC576.13	med20	swc5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.4417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527466	2542418	2539444	278881	276007	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC576.13	dad2	swc5	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527467	2542239	2539444	278711	276007	SPAC18G6.02c	SPCC576.13	chp1	swc5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527468	2541899	2539444	278389	276007	SPAC22E12.11c	SPCC576.13	set3	swc5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527469	2541496	2539444	277998	276007	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC576.13	arp42	swc5	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.3847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527470	2541531	2539444	278031	276007	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC576.13	fft3	swc5	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.6582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527471	2541889	2539444	278379	276007	SPAC2F7.03c	SPCC576.13	pom1	swc5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527472	2541801	2539444	278292	276007	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC576.13	snf5	swc5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527473	2543452	2539444	279872	276007	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC576.13	ssu72	swc5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.6681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527474	2543643	2539444	280057	276007	SPAC3G9.07c	SPCC576.13	hos2	swc5	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527475	2543443	2539444	279863	276007	SPAC3H1.12c	SPCC576.13	snt2	swc5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.6159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527476	2543426	2539444	279846	276007	SPAC631.02	SPCC576.13	bdf2	swc5	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.6777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527477	2543563	2539444	279979	276007	SPAC664.02c	SPCC576.13	arp8	swc5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.3958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527478	2542845	2539444	279291	276007	SPAC824.04	SPCC576.13	SPAC824.04	swc5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527479	2542192	2539444	278667	276007	SPAC9G1.12	SPCC576.13	cpd1	swc5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527480	2542021	2539444	278504	276007	SPAP14E8.02	SPCC576.13	tos4	swc5	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527481	2543387	2539444	279809	276007	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC576.13	mcl1	swc5	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527482	2539667	2539444	276222	276007	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC576.13	ash2	swc5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.6176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527483	2539733	2539444	276285	276007	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC576.13	pab2	swc5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527484	2539925	2539444	276469	276007	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC576.13	SPBC16H5.13	swc5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527485	2539999	2539444	276543	276007	SPBC1734.15	SPCC576.13	rsc4	swc5	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527486	2540115	2539444	276652	276007	SPBC1778.02	SPCC576.13	rap1	swc5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527487	2539714	2539444	276267	276007	SPBC1861.07	SPCC576.13	SPBC1861.07	swc5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527488	2540678	2539444	277203	276007	SPBC1A4.10c	SPCC576.13	pmc1	swc5	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527489	2540498	2539444	277026	276007	SPBC27.02c	SPCC576.13	ask1	swc5	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527490	2540353	2539444	276882	276007	SPBC2F12.12c	SPCC576.13	cay1	swc5	SPBC2F12.12c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.5839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527491	2540967	2539444	277483	276007	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC576.13	SPBC36B7.08c	swc5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527492	2540979	2539444	277495	276007	SPBC3H7.10	SPCC576.13	elp6	swc5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527493	2540825	2539444	277343	276007	SPBC428.08c	SPCC576.13	clr4	swc5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527494	2540749	2539444	277271	276007	SPBC4B4.03	SPCC576.13	rsc1	swc5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527495	2541088	2539444	277603	276007	SPBC609.05	SPCC576.13	pob3	swc5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.1406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527496	2540735	2539444	277258	276007	SPBC83.03c	SPCC576.13	tas3	swc5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.6983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527497	2539050	2539444	275623	276007	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC576.13	rik1	swc5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527498	2538701	2539444	275286	276007	SPCC1235.09	SPCC576.13	hif2	swc5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527499	2539366	2539444	275932	276007	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC576.13	pef1	swc5	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.0294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527500	2539379	2539444	275945	276007	SPCC188.02	SPCC576.13	par1	swc5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.8644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527501	2538913	2539444	275490	276007	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC576.13	ccr4	swc5	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527502	2538778	2539444	275359	276007	SPCC4G3.15c	SPCC576.13	not2	swc5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527503	2541496	2539483	277998	276046	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC584.02	arp42	cuf2	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527504	2539375	2539483	275941	276046	SPCC4G3.11	SPCC584.02	mug154	cuf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527505	2543263	2539023	279691	275596	SPAC1002.15c	SPCC594.05c	med6	spf1	pmc5	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527506	2541536	2539023	278036	275596	SPAC1071.02	SPCC594.05c	mms19	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.1063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527507	3361561	2539023	280637	275596	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC594.05c	swr1	spf1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527508	2542757	2539023	279207	275596	SPAC13C5.07	SPCC594.05c	mre11	spf1	rad32	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527509	2542349	2539023	278814	275596	SPAC1782.05	SPCC594.05c	ypa2	spf1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527510	2542363	2539023	278827	275596	SPAC1783.05	SPCC594.05c	hrp1	spf1	chd1	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527511	2542277	2539023	278746	275596	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC594.05c	dbr1	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527512	2542168	2539023	278643	275596	SPAC17A5.16	SPCC594.05c	ftp105	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527513	2542421	2539023	278884	275596	SPAC17G8.05	SPCC594.05c	med20	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527514	2542278	2539023	278747	275596	SPAC17G8.07	SPCC594.05c	yaf9	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.9551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527515	2542170	2539023	278645	275596	SPAC17G8.13c	SPCC594.05c	mst2	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527516	2542418	2539023	278881	275596	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC594.05c	dad2	spf1	hos2	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.1352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527517	2542123	2539023	278599	275596	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC594.05c	mal3	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.62	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527518	2542513	2539023	278971	275596	SPAC1952.05	SPCC594.05c	gcn5	spf1	kat2	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527519	2542555	2539023	279012	275596	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC594.05c	SPAC1952.06c	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527520	2542519	2539023	278977	275596	SPAC19G12.08	SPCC594.05c	scs7	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.8914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527521	2542541	2539023	278998	275596	SPAC1B3.03c	SPCC594.05c	wis2	spf1	cyp5	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527522	2542126	2539023	278602	275596	SPAC1B3.05	SPCC594.05c	not3	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527523	2542007	2539023	278490	275596	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC594.05c	rad57	spf1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527524	2542023	2539023	278506	275596	SPAC20H4.10	SPCC594.05c	ufd2	spf1	SPAC145.04	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.9597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527525	2541786	2539023	278278	275596	SPAC22F3.08c	SPCC594.05c	rok1	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527526	2541871	2539023	278361	275596	SPAC22F3.09c	SPCC594.05c	res2	spf1	mcs1|pct1	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527527	2542032	2539023	278514	275596	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC594.05c	pnk1	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527528	2541496	2539023	277998	275596	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC594.05c	arp42	spf1	arp4	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.9677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527529	2541531	2539023	278031	275596	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC594.05c	fft3	spf1	snf2SR	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.0485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527530	2541672	2539023	278168	275596	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC594.05c	lsk1	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527531	2543190	2539023	279619	275596	SPAC31F12.01	SPCC594.05c	zds1	spf1	SPAC637.14|mug88	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.4503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527532	2542592	2539023	279047	275596	SPAC328.01c	SPCC594.05c	msn5	spf1	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527533	2541710	2539023	278205	275596	SPAC343.11c	SPCC594.05c	msc1	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527534	2543044	2539023	279479	275596	SPAC3C7.12	SPCC594.05c	tip1	spf1	noc1	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527535	2543064	2539023	279497	275596	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC594.05c	hrp3	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.4548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527536	2543443	2539023	279863	275596	SPAC3H1.12c	SPCC594.05c	snt2	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527537	2543616	2539023	280030	275596	SPAC4A8.09c	SPCC594.05c	cwf21	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.6495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527538	2543619	2539023	280033	275596	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC594.05c	ypa1	spf1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527539	2543516	2539023	279934	275596	SPAC4F10.11	SPCC594.05c	spn1	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527540	2543432	2539023	279852	275596	SPAC4G8.05	SPCC594.05c	ppk14	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527541	2543426	2539023	279846	275596	SPAC631.02	SPCC594.05c	bdf2	spf1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527542	2543384	2539023	279806	275596	SPAC637.06	SPCC594.05c	gmh5	spf1	SPAC637.06	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527543	2543580	2539023	279995	275596	SPAC644.14c	SPCC594.05c	rad51	spf1	rhp51	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.3711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527544	2543563	2539023	279979	275596	SPAC664.02c	SPCC594.05c	arp8	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.3649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527545	2542845	2539023	279291	275596	SPAC824.04	SPCC594.05c	SPAC824.04	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527546	2542102	2539023	278578	275596	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC594.05c	spc34	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527547	2542329	2539023	278795	275596	SPAC9G1.10c	SPCC594.05c	SPAC9G1.10c	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527548	2543387	2539023	279809	275596	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC594.05c	mcl1	spf1	slr3	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527549	2543670	2539023	280084	275596	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPCC594.05c	eme1	spf1	mms4|slx2	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.1535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527550	2539971	2539023	276515	275596	SPBC1105.04c	SPCC594.05c	cbp1	spf1	abp1	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527551	2539930	2539023	276474	275596	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC594.05c	reb1	spf1	SPBC660.01c	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.2472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527552	2539668	2539023	276223	275596	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC594.05c	pht1	spf1	pi001	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.5819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527553	2539857	2539023	276404	275596	SPBC1604.20c	SPCC594.05c	tea2	spf1	klp4	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527554	2539700	2539023	276253	275596	SPBC1685.15c	SPCC594.05c	klp6	spf1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527555	2540154	2539023	276690	275596	SPBC16C6.05	SPCC594.05c	SPBC16C6.05	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.9555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527556	2539925	2539023	276469	275596	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC594.05c	SPBC16H5.13	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527557	2539999	2539023	276543	275596	SPBC1734.15	SPCC594.05c	rsc4	spf1	brd1	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.2987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527558	2540077	2539023	276615	275596	SPBC17D11.04c	SPCC594.05c	nto1	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.0097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527559	2539714	2539023	276267	275596	SPBC1861.07	SPCC594.05c	SPBC1861.07	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527560	2540837	2539023	277355	275596	SPBC18H10.08c	SPCC594.05c	ubp4	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527561	2540787	2539023	277306	275596	SPBC1921.07c	SPCC594.05c	sgf29	spf1	SPBC21D10.13	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527562	2540686	2539023	277211	275596	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC594.05c	bdc1	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-20.9371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527563	2540498	2539023	277026	275596	SPBC27.02c	SPCC594.05c	ask1	spf1	mug181	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527564	2540436	2539023	276964	275596	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC594.05c	ngg1	spf1	ada3|kap1	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527565	2540353	2539023	276882	275596	SPBC2F12.12c	SPCC594.05c	cay1	spf1	SPBC2F12.12c	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.4154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527566	2540322	2539023	276852	275596	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC594.05c	SPBC31F10.10c	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.7712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527567	2540396	2539023	276924	275596	SPBC31F10.12	SPCC594.05c	tma20	spf1	SPBC31F10.12	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527568	2540219	2539023	276752	275596	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC594.05c	hip1	spf1	hir1	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.3665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527569	2540220	2539023	276753	275596	SPBC337.03	SPCC594.05c	rhn1	spf1	SPBC337.03|iss4	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527570	2540967	2539023	277483	275596	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC594.05c	SPBC36B7.08c	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527571	2540320	2539023	276850	275596	SPBC3D6.04c	SPCC594.05c	mad1	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527572	2540749	2539023	277271	275596	SPBC4B4.03	SPCC594.05c	rsc1	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.0164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527573	2540999	2539023	277515	275596	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC594.05c	SPBC4B4.04	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.8333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527574	2541101	2539023	277616	275596	SPBC609.02	SPCC594.05c	ptn1	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527575	2541095	2539023	277610	275596	SPBC725.06c	SPCC594.05c	ppk31	spf1	mug25	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527576	2540821	2539023	277339	275596	SPBC800.03	SPCC594.05c	clr3	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.8483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527577	2540829	2539023	277347	275596	SPBC800.09	SPCC594.05c	sum2	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527578	2541284	2539023	277797	275596	SPBC947.08c	SPCC594.05c	hip4	spf1	hpc2	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.1359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527579	2541349	2539023	277860	275596	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC594.05c	air1	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527580	2538987	2539023	275561	275596	SPCC11E10.06c	SPCC594.05c	elp4	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527581	2538906	2539023	275483	275596	SPCC1259.03	SPCC594.05c	rpa12	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527582	2539379	2539023	275945	275596	SPCC188.02	SPCC594.05c	par1	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.5017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527583	2539130	2539023	275702	275596	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC594.05c	amk2	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527584	2539319	2539023	275885	275596	SPCC1919.13c	SPCC594.05c	SPCC1919.13c	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527585	2538801	2539023	275382	275596	SPCC285.13c	SPCC594.05c	nup60	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527586	2541650	2538848	278146	275429	SPAC14C4.12c	SPCC613.12c	laf1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527587	2542764	2538848	279214	275429	SPAC15E1.10	SPCC613.12c	SPAC15E1.10	raf1	SPAP7G5.01	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527588	2542311	2538848	278777	275429	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC613.12c	dad1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527589	2542277	2538848	278746	275429	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC613.12c	dbr1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.2938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527590	2542207	2538848	278682	275429	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC613.12c	ddb1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527591	2542418	2538848	278881	275429	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC613.12c	dad2	raf1	hos2	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527592	2542123	2538848	278599	275429	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC613.12c	mal3	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-19.9395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527593	2542513	2538848	278971	275429	SPAC1952.05	SPCC613.12c	gcn5	raf1	kat2	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527594	2542237	2538848	278709	275429	SPAC19E9.02	SPCC613.12c	fin1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.5426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527595	2542007	2538848	278490	275429	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC613.12c	rad57	raf1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527596	2542023	2538848	278506	275429	SPAC20H4.10	SPCC613.12c	ufd2	raf1	SPAC145.04	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527597	2542032	2538848	278514	275429	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC613.12c	pnk1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527598	2541496	2538848	277998	275429	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC613.12c	arp42	raf1	arp4	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.6771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527599	2541856	2538848	278347	275429	SPAC23H3.08c	SPCC613.12c	bub3	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.6199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527600	2542667	2538848	279120	275429	SPAC26A3.16	SPCC613.12c	dph1	raf1	ucp5	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527601	2541614	2538848	278111	275429	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC613.12c	elp3	raf1	kat9	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.7754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527602	2543510	2538848	279928	275429	SPAC30D11.07	SPCC613.12c	nth1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527603	2543078	2538848	279511	275429	SPAC31A2.15c	SPCC613.12c	dcc1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527604	2542592	2538848	279047	275429	SPAC328.01c	SPCC613.12c	msn5	raf1	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527605	2543044	2538848	279479	275429	SPAC3C7.12	SPCC613.12c	tip1	raf1	noc1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527606	2543118	2538848	279550	275429	SPAC3G6.11	SPCC613.12c	chl1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.1865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527607	2543378	2538848	279800	275429	SPAC3H8.07c	SPCC613.12c	pac10	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527608	2543384	2538848	279806	275429	SPAC637.06	SPCC613.12c	gmh5	raf1	SPAC637.06	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527609	2543240	2538848	279668	275429	SPAC694.06c	SPCC613.12c	mrc1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.7224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527610	2543226	2538848	279654	275429	SPAC6B12.05c	SPCC613.12c	ies2	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527611	2541819	2538848	278310	275429	SPAC6G9.08	SPCC613.12c	ubp6	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527612	2543341	2538848	279764	275429	SPAC8E11.07c	SPCC613.12c	alp31	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-18.2394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527613	2543668	2538848	280082	275429	SPAC9.05	SPCC613.12c	fml1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527614	2543372	2538848	279794	275429	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC613.12c	ase1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.4265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527615	2543670	2538848	280084	275429	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPCC613.12c	eme1	raf1	mms4|slx2	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527616	2540060	2538848	276598	275429	SPBC106.01	SPCC613.12c	mph1	raf1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.6859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527617	2539604	2538848	276162	275429	SPBC1105.14	SPCC613.12c	rsv2	raf1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527618	2539930	2538848	276474	275429	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC613.12c	reb1	raf1	SPBC660.01c	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527619	2539668	2538848	276223	275429	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC613.12c	pht1	raf1	pi001	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.3859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527620	2539651	2538848	276206	275429	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC613.12c	srb11	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527621	2539812	2538848	276362	275429	SPBC1347.02	SPCC613.12c	fkbp39	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.6699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527622	2540589	2538848	277115	275429	SPBC20F10.06	SPCC613.12c	mad2	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.59	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527623	2540498	2538848	277026	275429	SPBC27.02c	SPCC613.12c	ask1	raf1	mug181	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527624	2540337	2538848	276866	275429	SPBC28F2.11	SPCC613.12c	hmo1	raf1	SPBC28F2.11	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.7977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527625	2540512	2538848	277040	275429	SPBC29A3.05	SPCC613.12c	vps71	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527626	2540353	2538848	276882	275429	SPBC2F12.12c	SPCC613.12c	cay1	raf1	SPBC2F12.12c	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527627	3361323	2538848	280399	275429	SPBC30D10.04	SPCC613.12c	swi3	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.0652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527628	2540219	2538848	276752	275429	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC613.12c	hip1	raf1	hir1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527629	2540945	2538848	277461	275429	SPBC342.06c	SPCC613.12c	rtt109	raf1	kat11	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.89	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527630	2540929	2538848	277445	275429	SPBC354.03	SPCC613.12c	swd3	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527631	2541017	2538848	277532	275429	SPBC36.07	SPCC613.12c	elp1	raf1	iki3	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.1003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527632	2540320	2538848	276850	275429	SPBC3D6.04c	SPCC613.12c	mad1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527633	2540968	2538848	277484	275429	SPBC3H7.07c	SPCC613.12c	ser2	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.6076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527634	2540979	2538848	277495	275429	SPBC3H7.10	SPCC613.12c	elp6	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.2323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527635	2540821	2538848	277339	275429	SPBC800.03	SPCC613.12c	clr3	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.3452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527636	2540936	2538848	277452	275429	SPBC800.05c	SPCC613.12c	atb2	raf1	alp2|ban5|tub1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527637	2541208	2538848	277722	275429	SPBC887.04c	SPCC613.12c	lub1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527638	2541284	2538848	277797	275429	SPBC947.08c	SPCC613.12c	hip4	raf1	hpc2	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527639	2541379	2538848	277890	275429	SPBP8B7.27	SPCC613.12c	mug30	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527640	2538987	2538848	275561	275429	SPCC11E10.06c	SPCC613.12c	elp4	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.4725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527641	2538906	2538848	275483	275429	SPCC1259.03	SPCC613.12c	rpa12	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.2656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527642	2539066	2538848	275638	275429	SPCC126.13c	SPCC613.12c	SPCC126.13c	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527643	2538868	2538848	275448	275429	SPCC132.02	SPCC613.12c	hst2	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527644	2538890	2538848	275468	275429	SPCC1393.02c	SPCC613.12c	spt2	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527645	2539348	2538848	275914	275429	SPCC18B5.07c	SPCC613.12c	nup61	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.7405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527646	2538801	2538848	275382	275429	SPCC285.13c	SPCC613.12c	nup60	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527647	2539215	2538848	275785	275429	SPCC285.16c	SPCC613.12c	msh6	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.9635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527648	2538913	2538848	275490	275429	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC613.12c	ccr4	raf1	SPCC5E4.02c	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527649	2539444	2538848	276007	275429	SPCC576.13	SPCC613.12c	swc5	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527650	2541536	2539499	278036	276062	SPAC1071.02	SPCC622.08c	mms19	hta1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.81	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527651	2542318	2539499	278784	276062	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC622.08c	cph1	hta1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527652	2541531	2539499	278031	276062	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC622.08c	fft3	hta1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.4828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527653	2541672	2539499	278168	276062	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC622.08c	lsk1	hta1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527654	2543160	2539499	279591	276062	SPAC31A2.14	SPCC622.08c	bun107	hta1	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527655	2543563	2539499	279979	276062	SPAC664.02c	SPCC622.08c	arp8	hta1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527656	2539925	2539499	276469	276062	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC622.08c	SPBC16H5.13	hta1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.3102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527657	2540967	2539499	277483	276062	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC622.08c	SPBC36B7.08c	hta1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527658	2540999	2539499	277515	276062	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC622.08c	SPBC4B4.04	hta1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527659	2541088	2539499	277603	276062	SPBC609.05	SPCC622.08c	pob3	hta1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527660	2541349	2539499	277860	276062	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC622.08c	air1	hta1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527661	2539248	2539499	275818	276062	SPCC1739.03	SPCC622.08c	hrr1	hta1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527662	2542462	2539454	278923	276017	SPAC19B12.11c	SPCC622.15c	SPAC19B12.11c	SPCC622.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527663	2539248	2539454	275818	276017	SPCC1739.03	SPCC622.15c	hrr1	SPCC622.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527664	2538848	2539454	275429	276017	SPCC613.12c	SPCC622.15c	raf1	SPCC622.15c	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527665	2543263	2539481	279691	276044	SPAC1002.15c	SPCC622.16c	med6	epe1	pmc5	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527666	2542757	2539481	279207	276044	SPAC13C5.07	SPCC622.16c	mre11	epe1	rad32	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527667	5802929	2539481	858067	276044	SPAC1556.08c	SPCC622.16c	cbs2	epe1	SPAC1F12.01c	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527668	2542349	2539481	278814	276044	SPAC1782.05	SPCC622.16c	ypa2	epe1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527669	2542277	2539481	278746	276044	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC622.16c	dbr1	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527670	2542421	2539481	278884	276044	SPAC17G8.05	SPCC622.16c	med20	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527671	2542170	2539481	278645	276044	SPAC17G8.13c	SPCC622.16c	mst2	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527672	2542207	2539481	278682	276044	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC622.16c	ddb1	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527673	2541941	2539481	278428	276044	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC622.16c	tfs1	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527674	2542007	2539481	278490	276044	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC622.16c	rad57	epe1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527675	2541496	2539481	277998	276044	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC622.16c	arp42	epe1	arp4	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527676	2541776	2539481	278270	276044	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC622.16c	swd1	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527677	2541789	2539481	278281	276044	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC622.16c	iwr1	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527678	2541656	2539481	278152	276044	SPAC25H1.06	SPCC622.16c	pcf3	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6462	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527679	2542701	2539481	279154	276044	SPAC26H5.05	SPCC622.16c	mga2	epe1	SPAC26H5.05	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527680	2541889	2539481	278379	276044	SPAC2F7.03c	SPCC622.16c	pom1	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527681	2543064	2539481	279497	276044	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC622.16c	hrp3	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527682	2543118	2539481	279550	276044	SPAC3G6.11	SPCC622.16c	chl1	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527683	2543619	2539481	280033	276044	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC622.16c	ypa1	epe1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527684	2539971	2539481	276515	276044	SPBC1105.04c	SPCC622.16c	cbp1	epe1	abp1	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527685	2539667	2539481	276222	276044	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC622.16c	ash2	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527686	2540019	2539481	276563	276044	SPBC1685.01	SPCC622.16c	pmp1	epe1	dsp1	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527687	2540154	2539481	276690	276044	SPBC16C6.05	SPCC622.16c	SPBC16C6.05	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527688	2540198	2539481	276731	276044	SPBC1709.04c	SPCC622.16c	cyp3	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527689	2539953	2539481	276497	276044	SPBC1709.11c	SPCC622.16c	png2	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527690	2539999	2539481	276543	276044	SPBC1734.15	SPCC622.16c	rsc4	epe1	brd1	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527691	2540115	2539481	276652	276044	SPBC1778.02	SPCC622.16c	rap1	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.5365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527692	2540077	2539481	276615	276044	SPBC17D11.04c	SPCC622.16c	nto1	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.7727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527693	2539714	2539481	276267	276044	SPBC1861.07	SPCC622.16c	SPBC1861.07	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527694	2540788	2539481	277307	276044	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC622.16c	swd2	epe1	swd2.1	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527695	2540352	2539481	276881	276044	SPBC215.03c	SPCC622.16c	csn1	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.8696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527696	2540680	2539481	277205	276044	SPBC26H8.05c	SPCC622.16c	pph3	epe1	SPBC26H8.05c	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527697	2540346	2539481	276875	276044	SPBC2F12.03c	SPCC622.16c	ebs1	epe1	SPBC2F12.03c	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527698	2540353	2539481	276882	276044	SPBC2F12.12c	SPCC622.16c	cay1	epe1	SPBC2F12.12c	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.4599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527699	2540322	2539481	276852	276044	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC622.16c	SPBC31F10.10c	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527700	2540396	2539481	276924	276044	SPBC31F10.12	SPCC622.16c	tma20	epe1	SPBC31F10.12	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527701	2540929	2539481	277445	276044	SPBC354.03	SPCC622.16c	swd3	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.0153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527702	2540368	2539481	276897	276044	SPBC36.05c	SPCC622.16c	clr6	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527703	2540749	2539481	277271	276044	SPBC4B4.03	SPCC622.16c	rsc1	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.8123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527704	2539847	2539481	276395	276044	SPBC530.14c	SPCC622.16c	dsk1	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527705	2541095	2539481	277610	276044	SPBC725.06c	SPCC622.16c	ppk31	epe1	mug25	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527706	2541349	2539481	277860	276044	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC622.16c	air1	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527707	2541289	2539481	277802	276044	SPBP35G2.09	SPCC622.16c	usp103	epe1	yhc1	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527708	2541337	2539481	277848	276044	SPBP35G2.13c	SPCC622.16c	swc2	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527709	2538710	2539481	275294	276044	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC622.16c	xap5	epe1	SPCC14G10.06	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527710	2539366	2539481	275932	276044	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC622.16c	pef1	epe1	p31	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.1395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527711	2539130	2539481	275702	276044	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC622.16c	amk2	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527712	2538762	2539481	275345	276044	SPCC306.04c	SPCC622.16c	set1	epe1	kmt2	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527713	2539444	2539481	276007	276044	SPCC576.13	SPCC622.16c	swc5	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527714	2539023	2539481	275596	276044	SPCC594.05c	SPCC622.16c	spf1	epe1	spp1	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527715	2540354	2538794	276883	275375	SPBC29A3.13	SPCC622.17	pdp1	apn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527716	2542519	2538700	278977	275285	SPAC19G12.08	SPCC645.13	scs7	SPCC645.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527717	2542032	2538700	278514	275285	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC645.13	pnk1	SPCC645.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527718	2542701	2538700	279154	275285	SPAC26H5.05	SPCC645.13	mga2	SPCC645.13	SPAC26H5.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527719	2543384	2538700	279806	275285	SPAC637.06	SPCC645.13	gmh5	SPCC645.13	SPAC637.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527720	2542198	2538700	278673	275285	SPAC6F12.09	SPCC645.13	rdp1	SPCC645.13	rdr1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527721	2539911	2538700	276456	275285	SPBC15D4.10c	SPCC645.13	amo1	SPCC645.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527722	2540220	2538700	276753	275285	SPBC337.03	SPCC645.13	rhn1	SPCC645.13	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527723	2539366	2538700	275932	275285	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC645.13	pef1	SPCC645.13	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527724	2539014	2538700	275587	275285	SPCC18B5.05c	SPCC645.13	SPCC18B5.05c	SPCC645.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527725	2543263	2539568	279691	276128	SPAC1002.15c	SPCC663.05c	med6	cia1	pmc5	asf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527726	2541536	2539568	278036	276128	SPAC1071.02	SPCC663.05c	mms19	cia1	-	asf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527727	2541628	2539568	278124	276128	SPAC110.02	SPCC663.05c	pds5	cia1	-	asf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527728	2541643	2539568	278139	276128	SPAC14C4.13	SPCC663.05c	rad17	cia1	-	asf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527729	2542418	2539568	278881	276128	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC663.05c	dad2	cia1	hos2	asf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527730	2542513	2539568	278971	276128	SPAC1952.05	SPCC663.05c	gcn5	cia1	kat2	asf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527731	2542519	2539568	278977	276128	SPAC19G12.08	SPCC663.05c	scs7	cia1	-	asf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527732	2542459	2539568	278920	276128	SPAC1D4.03c	SPCC663.05c	aut12	cia1	-	asf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527733	2541941	2539568	278428	276128	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC663.05c	tfs1	cia1	-	asf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527734	2541871	2539568	278361	276128	SPAC22F3.09c	SPCC663.05c	res2	cia1	mcs1|pct1	asf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527735	2541776	2539568	278270	276128	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC663.05c	swd1	cia1	-	asf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527736	2541578	2539568	278075	276128	SPAC25B8.05	SPCC663.05c	deg1	cia1	SPAC25B8.05	asf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527737	2542701	2539568	279154	276128	SPAC26H5.05	SPCC663.05c	mga2	cia1	SPAC26H5.05	asf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527738	2541713	2539568	278208	276128	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC663.05c	atp11	cia1	-	asf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527739	2543044	2539568	279479	276128	SPAC3C7.12	SPCC663.05c	tip1	cia1	noc1	asf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527740	2539930	2539568	276474	276128	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC663.05c	reb1	cia1	SPBC660.01c	asf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527741	2539651	2539568	276206	276128	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC663.05c	srb11	cia1	-	asf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527742	2539857	2539568	276404	276128	SPBC1604.20c	SPCC663.05c	tea2	cia1	klp4	asf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527743	2539949	2539568	276493	276128	SPBC1703.04	SPCC663.05c	mlh1	cia1	-	asf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527744	2540597	2539568	277123	276128	SPBC29A3.09c	SPCC663.05c	SPBC29A3.09c	cia1	-	asf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527745	2540322	2539568	276852	276128	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC663.05c	SPBC31F10.10c	cia1	-	asf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527746	2540221	2539568	276754	276128	SPBC32F12.02	SPCC663.05c	rec14	cia1	-	asf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527747	2540968	2539568	277484	276128	SPBC3H7.07c	SPCC663.05c	ser2	cia1	-	asf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527748	2540893	2539568	277409	276128	SPBC543.10	SPCC663.05c	get1	cia1	-	asf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527749	2541292	2539568	277804	276128	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC663.05c	sdh4	cia1	tim18	asf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527750	2539130	2539568	275702	276128	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC663.05c	amk2	cia1	-	asf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527751	2541650	2539423	278146	275988	SPAC14C4.12c	SPCC663.12	laf1	cid12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527752	2542207	2539423	278682	275988	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC663.12	ddb1	cid12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527753	2542123	2539423	278599	275988	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC663.12	mal3	cid12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527754	2542513	2539423	278971	275988	SPAC1952.05	SPCC663.12	gcn5	cid12	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527755	2541438	2539423	277943	275988	SPAC23G3.10c	SPCC663.12	ssr3	cid12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527756	2543452	2539423	279872	275988	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC663.12	ssu72	cid12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527757	2543616	2539423	280030	275988	SPAC4A8.09c	SPCC663.12	cwf21	cid12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527758	2543516	2539423	279934	275988	SPAC4F10.11	SPCC663.12	spn1	cid12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527759	2541819	2539423	278310	275988	SPAC6G9.08	SPCC663.12	ubp6	cid12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527760	2542845	2539423	279291	275988	SPAC824.04	SPCC663.12	SPAC824.04	cid12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527761	2543341	2539423	279764	275988	SPAC8E11.07c	SPCC663.12	alp31	cid12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527762	2540060	2539423	276598	275988	SPBC106.01	SPCC663.12	mph1	cid12	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527763	2539812	2539423	276362	275988	SPBC1347.02	SPCC663.12	fkbp39	cid12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527764	3361342	2539423	280418	275988	SPBC16D10.07c	SPCC663.12	sir2	cid12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527765	2540352	2539423	276881	275988	SPBC215.03c	SPCC663.12	csn1	cid12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527766	2540219	2539423	276752	275988	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC663.12	hip1	cid12	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527767	2540945	2539423	277461	275988	SPBC342.06c	SPCC663.12	rtt109	cid12	kat11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527768	2540821	2539423	277339	275988	SPBC800.03	SPCC663.12	clr3	cid12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527769	2541208	2539423	277722	275988	SPBC887.04c	SPCC663.12	lub1	cid12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527770	2541284	2539423	277797	275988	SPBC947.08c	SPCC663.12	hip4	cid12	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527771	2538710	2539423	275294	275988	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC663.12	xap5	cid12	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527772	2541628	2539403	278124	275968	SPAC110.02	SPCC736.11	pds5	ago1	-	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527773	2541650	2539403	278146	275968	SPAC14C4.12c	SPCC736.11	laf1	ago1	-	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527774	2542788	2539403	279237	275968	SPAC15A10.15	SPCC736.11	sgo2	ago1	-	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527775	2542318	2539403	278784	275968	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC736.11	cph1	ago1	-	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527776	2542363	2539403	278827	275968	SPAC1783.05	SPCC736.11	hrp1	ago1	chd1	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527777	2542277	2539403	278746	275968	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC736.11	dbr1	ago1	-	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.8537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527778	2542145	2539403	278621	275968	SPAC17C9.09c	SPCC736.11	tim13	ago1	-	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527779	2542123	2539403	278599	275968	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC736.11	mal3	ago1	-	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.0107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527780	2542392	2539403	278856	275968	SPAC19D5.02c	SPCC736.11	SPAC19D5.02c	ago1	-	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527781	2542237	2539403	278709	275968	SPAC19E9.02	SPCC736.11	fin1	ago1	-	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.6675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527782	2541468	2539403	277970	275968	SPAC1F5.09c	SPCC736.11	shk2	ago1	pak2	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527783	2542023	2539403	278506	275968	SPAC20H4.10	SPCC736.11	ufd2	ago1	SPAC145.04	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527784	2542066	2539403	278543	275968	SPAC227.05	SPCC736.11	SPAC227.05	ago1	-	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527785	2541856	2539403	278347	275968	SPAC23H3.08c	SPCC736.11	bub3	ago1	-	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527786	2541531	2539403	278031	275968	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC736.11	fft3	ago1	snf2SR	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527787	2541889	2539403	278379	275968	SPAC2F7.03c	SPCC736.11	pom1	ago1	-	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527788	2542592	2539403	279047	275968	SPAC328.01c	SPCC736.11	msn5	ago1	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527789	2543106	2539403	279538	275968	SPAC3A11.13	SPCC736.11	SPAC3A11.13	ago1	SPAC3H5.02	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527790	2543118	2539403	279550	275968	SPAC3G6.11	SPCC736.11	chl1	ago1	-	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527791	2543643	2539403	280057	275968	SPAC3G9.07c	SPCC736.11	hos2	ago1	hda1|phd1	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527792	2543378	2539403	279800	275968	SPAC3H8.07c	SPCC736.11	pac10	ago1	-	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527793	2543529	2539403	279947	275968	SPAC4C5.02c	SPCC736.11	ryh1	ago1	hos1|sat7	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527794	2543426	2539403	279846	275968	SPAC631.02	SPCC736.11	bdf2	ago1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527795	2543384	2539403	279806	275968	SPAC637.06	SPCC736.11	gmh5	ago1	SPAC637.06	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527796	2543563	2539403	279979	275968	SPAC664.02c	SPCC736.11	arp8	ago1	-	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527797	2543240	2539403	279668	275968	SPAC694.06c	SPCC736.11	mrc1	ago1	-	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.2704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527798	2542845	2539403	279291	275968	SPAC824.04	SPCC736.11	SPAC824.04	ago1	-	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527799	2543567	2539403	279983	275968	SPAC890.03	SPCC736.11	ppk16	ago1	mug92	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527800	2542102	2539403	278578	275968	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC736.11	spc34	ago1	-	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527801	2543341	2539403	279764	275968	SPAC8E11.07c	SPCC736.11	alp31	ago1	-	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.8738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527802	2543372	2539403	279794	275968	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC736.11	ase1	ago1	-	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.6129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527803	2543670	2539403	280084	275968	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPCC736.11	eme1	ago1	mms4|slx2	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527804	2540060	2539403	276598	275968	SPBC106.01	SPCC736.11	mph1	ago1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.4355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527805	2539971	2539403	276515	275968	SPBC1105.04c	SPCC736.11	cbp1	ago1	abp1	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527806	2539930	2539403	276474	275968	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC736.11	reb1	ago1	SPBC660.01c	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527807	2539812	2539403	276362	275968	SPBC1347.02	SPCC736.11	fkbp39	ago1	-	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-19.6416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527808	2539714	2539403	276267	275968	SPBC1861.07	SPCC736.11	SPBC1861.07	ago1	-	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527809	2540589	2539403	277115	275968	SPBC20F10.06	SPCC736.11	mad2	ago1	-	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527810	2540664	2539403	277189	275968	SPBC215.02	SPCC736.11	bob1	ago1	gim5	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527811	2540531	2539403	277059	275968	SPBC23E6.08	SPCC736.11	sat1	ago1	-	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527812	2540512	2539403	277040	275968	SPBC29A3.05	SPCC736.11	vps71	ago1	-	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527813	2540353	2539403	276882	275968	SPBC2F12.12c	SPCC736.11	cay1	ago1	SPBC2F12.12c	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527814	3361323	2539403	280399	275968	SPBC30D10.04	SPCC736.11	swi3	ago1	-	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527815	2540219	2539403	276752	275968	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC736.11	hip1	ago1	hir1	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527816	2540995	2539403	277511	275968	SPBC337.16	SPCC736.11	cho1	ago1	-	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527817	2540945	2539403	277461	275968	SPBC342.06c	SPCC736.11	rtt109	ago1	kat11	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527818	2540320	2539403	276850	275968	SPBC3D6.04c	SPCC736.11	mad1	ago1	-	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527819	2540936	2539403	277452	275968	SPBC800.05c	SPCC736.11	atb2	ago1	alp2|ban5|tub1	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527820	2541287	2539403	277800	275968	SPBP22H7.05c	SPCC736.11	abo2	ago1	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527821	2541379	2539403	277890	275968	SPBP8B7.27	SPCC736.11	mug30	ago1	-	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527822	2539041	2539403	275614	275968	SPCC18.06c	SPCC736.11	caf1	ago1	pop2	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.4841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527823	2539130	2539403	275702	275968	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC736.11	amk2	ago1	-	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527824	2539215	2539403	275785	275968	SPCC285.16c	SPCC736.11	msh6	ago1	-	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.27	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527825	2539444	2539403	276007	275968	SPCC576.13	SPCC736.11	swc5	ago1	-	csp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527826	2542513	2539412	278971	275977	SPAC1952.05	SPCC737.07c	gcn5	SPCC737.07c	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527827	2539971	2539412	276515	275977	SPBC1105.04c	SPCC737.07c	cbp1	SPCC737.07c	abp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527828	2540270	2539412	276801	275977	SPBC2G2.02	SPCC737.07c	syj1	SPCC737.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527829	2543263	2539434	279691	275997	SPAC1002.15c	SPCC757.09c	med6	rnc1	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.7502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527830	2541536	2539434	278036	275997	SPAC1071.02	SPCC757.09c	mms19	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527831	5802929	2539434	858067	275997	SPAC1556.08c	SPCC757.09c	cbs2	rnc1	SPAC1F12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527832	2542421	2539434	278884	275997	SPAC17G8.05	SPCC757.09c	med20	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.0527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527833	2542278	2539434	278747	275997	SPAC17G8.07	SPCC757.09c	yaf9	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527834	2542418	2539434	278881	275997	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC757.09c	dad2	rnc1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.6561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527835	2541941	2539434	278428	275997	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC757.09c	tfs1	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527836	2541899	2539434	278389	275997	SPAC22E12.11c	SPCC757.09c	set3	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527837	2541496	2539434	277998	275997	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC757.09c	arp42	rnc1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527838	2541789	2539434	278281	275997	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC757.09c	iwr1	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527839	2541531	2539434	278031	275997	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC757.09c	fft3	rnc1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.2299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527840	2542701	2539434	279154	275997	SPAC26H5.05	SPCC757.09c	mga2	rnc1	SPAC26H5.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527841	2541889	2539434	278379	275997	SPAC2F7.03c	SPCC757.09c	pom1	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527842	2542516	2539434	278974	275997	SPAC2F7.04	SPCC757.09c	pmc2	rnc1	med1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527843	2543160	2539434	279591	275997	SPAC31A2.14	SPCC757.09c	bun107	rnc1	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527844	2543643	2539434	280057	275997	SPAC3G9.07c	SPCC757.09c	hos2	rnc1	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527845	2543378	2539434	279800	275997	SPAC3H8.07c	SPCC757.09c	pac10	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527846	2543426	2539434	279846	275997	SPAC631.02	SPCC757.09c	bdf2	rnc1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527847	2542102	2539434	278578	275997	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC757.09c	spc34	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.1382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527848	2539668	2539434	276223	275997	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC757.09c	pht1	rnc1	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.2398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527849	2539726	2539434	276278	275997	SPBC13E7.08c	SPCC757.09c	leo1	rnc1	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527850	2539667	2539434	276222	275997	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC757.09c	ash2	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.2572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527851	2539949	2539434	276493	275997	SPBC1703.04	SPCC757.09c	mlh1	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527852	2539953	2539434	276497	275997	SPBC1709.11c	SPCC757.09c	png2	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527853	2540788	2539434	277307	275997	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC757.09c	swd2	rnc1	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527854	2540664	2539434	277189	275997	SPBC215.02	SPCC757.09c	bob1	rnc1	gim5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527855	2540317	2539434	276847	275997	SPBC24C6.05	SPCC757.09c	sec28	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527856	2540498	2539434	277026	275997	SPBC27.02c	SPCC757.09c	ask1	rnc1	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.4561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527857	3361323	2539434	280399	275997	SPBC30D10.04	SPCC757.09c	swi3	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527858	2540322	2539434	276852	275997	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC757.09c	SPBC31F10.10c	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527859	2540967	2539434	277483	275997	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC757.09c	SPBC36B7.08c	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527860	2540320	2539434	276850	275997	SPBC3D6.04c	SPCC757.09c	mad1	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527861	2540968	2539434	277484	275997	SPBC3H7.07c	SPCC757.09c	ser2	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527862	2540749	2539434	277271	275997	SPBC4B4.03	SPCC757.09c	rsc1	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527863	2541147	2539434	277662	275997	SPBC651.05c	SPCC757.09c	dot2	rnc1	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527864	2540821	2539434	277339	275997	SPBC800.03	SPCC757.09c	clr3	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527865	2541292	2539434	277804	275997	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC757.09c	sdh4	rnc1	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527866	2539041	2539434	275614	275997	SPCC18.06c	SPCC757.09c	caf1	rnc1	pop2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527867	2539379	2539434	275945	275997	SPCC188.02	SPCC757.09c	par1	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527868	2539130	2539434	275702	275997	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC757.09c	amk2	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527869	2539136	2539434	275708	275997	SPCC1919.05	SPCC757.09c	SPCC1919.05	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527870	2539215	2539434	275785	275997	SPCC285.16c	SPCC757.09c	msh6	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527871	2543263	2539291	279691	275859	SPAC1002.15c	SPCC757.10	med6	vph2	pmc5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.3252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527872	2541536	2539291	278036	275859	SPAC1071.02	SPCC757.10	mms19	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.9905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527873	2541575	2539291	278072	275859	SPAC12B10.01c	SPCC757.10	SPAC12B10.01c	vph2	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527874	5802929	2539291	858067	275859	SPAC1556.08c	SPCC757.10	cbs2	vph2	SPAC1F12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.0603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527875	2541529	2539291	278029	275859	SPAC1687.13c	SPCC757.10	csn5	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527876	2542277	2539291	278746	275859	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC757.10	dbr1	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527877	2542421	2539291	278884	275859	SPAC17G8.05	SPCC757.10	med20	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527878	2542207	2539291	278682	275859	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC757.10	ddb1	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527879	2542513	2539291	278971	275859	SPAC1952.05	SPCC757.10	gcn5	vph2	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.7881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527880	2542541	2539291	278998	275859	SPAC1B3.03c	SPCC757.10	wis2	vph2	cyp5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527881	2542459	2539291	278920	275859	SPAC1D4.03c	SPCC757.10	aut12	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.6231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527882	2541941	2539291	278428	275859	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC757.10	tfs1	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527883	2542023	2539291	278506	275859	SPAC20H4.10	SPCC757.10	ufd2	vph2	SPAC145.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527884	2541929	2539291	278417	275859	SPAC23C4.12	SPCC757.10	hhp2	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527885	2541781	2539291	278274	275859	SPAC23G3.07c	SPCC757.10	snf30	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527886	2541776	2539291	278270	275859	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC757.10	swd1	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.5649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527887	2541789	2539291	278281	275859	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC757.10	iwr1	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527888	2542701	2539291	279154	275859	SPAC26H5.05	SPCC757.10	mga2	vph2	SPAC26H5.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.2682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527889	2541614	2539291	278111	275859	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC757.10	elp3	vph2	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527890	2542094	2539291	278571	275859	SPAC29B12.06c	SPCC757.10	rcd1	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527891	2541889	2539291	278379	275859	SPAC2F7.03c	SPCC757.10	pom1	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527892	2541801	2539291	278292	275859	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC757.10	snf5	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.2186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527893	2543160	2539291	279591	275859	SPAC31A2.14	SPCC757.10	bun107	vph2	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.2213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527894	2543190	2539291	279619	275859	SPAC31F12.01	SPCC757.10	zds1	vph2	SPAC637.14|mug88	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.2548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527895	2542592	2539291	279047	275859	SPAC328.01c	SPCC757.10	msn5	vph2	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527896	3361512	2539291	280588	275859	SPAC3C7.01c	SPCC757.10	sac12	vph2	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.4424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527897	2543452	2539291	279872	275859	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC757.10	ssu72	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527898	2543619	2539291	280033	275859	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC757.10	ypa1	vph2	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.7902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527899	2543580	2539291	279995	275859	SPAC644.14c	SPCC757.10	rad51	vph2	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.2232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527900	2541819	2539291	278310	275859	SPAC6G9.08	SPCC757.10	ubp6	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527901	2542845	2539291	279291	275859	SPAC824.04	SPCC757.10	SPAC824.04	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.1158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527902	2543530	2539291	279948	275859	SPAC926.07c	SPCC757.10	dlc2	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527903	2543670	2539291	280084	275859	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPCC757.10	eme1	vph2	mms4|slx2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527904	2541470	2539291	277972	275859	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPCC757.10	rpb9	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527905	2539971	2539291	276515	275859	SPBC1105.04c	SPCC757.10	cbp1	vph2	abp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527906	2539604	2539291	276162	275859	SPBC1105.14	SPCC757.10	rsv2	vph2	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527907	2539667	2539291	276222	275859	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC757.10	ash2	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.5223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527908	2539925	2539291	276469	275859	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC757.10	SPBC16H5.13	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-27.0668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527909	2539953	2539291	276497	275859	SPBC1709.11c	SPCC757.10	png2	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.0195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527910	2540822	2539291	277340	275859	SPBC18E5.05c	SPCC757.10	elp5	vph2	iki1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.6098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527911	2540788	2539291	277307	275859	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC757.10	swd2	vph2	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.0097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527912	2540837	2539291	277355	275859	SPBC18H10.08c	SPCC757.10	ubp4	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527913	2540787	2539291	277306	275859	SPBC1921.07c	SPCC757.10	sgf29	vph2	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527914	2540352	2539291	276881	275859	SPBC215.03c	SPCC757.10	csn1	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527915	2540317	2539291	276847	275859	SPBC24C6.05	SPCC757.10	sec28	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527916	2540680	2539291	277205	275859	SPBC26H8.05c	SPCC757.10	pph3	vph2	SPBC26H8.05c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527917	2540436	2539291	276964	275859	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC757.10	ngg1	vph2	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.7898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527918	2540322	2539291	276852	275859	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC757.10	SPBC31F10.10c	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527919	2540241	2539291	276773	275859	SPBC32H8.11	SPCC757.10	mei4	vph2	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527920	2540220	2539291	276753	275859	SPBC337.03	SPCC757.10	rhn1	vph2	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.3707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527921	2540929	2539291	277445	275859	SPBC354.03	SPCC757.10	swd3	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527922	2540320	2539291	276850	275859	SPBC3D6.04c	SPCC757.10	mad1	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527923	2540825	2539291	277343	275859	SPBC428.08c	SPCC757.10	clr4	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527924	2540749	2539291	277271	275859	SPBC4B4.03	SPCC757.10	rsc1	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527925	2540893	2539291	277409	275859	SPBC543.10	SPCC757.10	get1	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527926	2540913	2539291	277429	275859	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC757.10	SPBC56F2.08c	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527927	2540829	2539291	277347	275859	SPBC800.09	SPCC757.10	sum2	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527928	2540735	2539291	277258	275859	SPBC83.03c	SPCC757.10	tas3	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527929	2541208	2539291	277722	275859	SPBC887.04c	SPCC757.10	lub1	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.7613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527930	2541349	2539291	277860	275859	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC757.10	air1	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527931	2539050	2539291	275623	275859	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC757.10	rik1	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527932	2538906	2539291	275483	275859	SPCC1259.03	SPCC757.10	rpa12	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527933	2538890	2539291	275468	275859	SPCC1393.02c	SPCC757.10	spt2	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527934	2538690	2539291	275275	275859	SPCC1393.05	SPCC757.10	ers1	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527935	2539248	2539291	275818	275859	SPCC1739.03	SPCC757.10	hrr1	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.2501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527936	2538930	2539291	275506	275859	SPCC188.13c	SPCC757.10	dcr1	vph2	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527937	2539130	2539291	275702	275859	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC757.10	amk2	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.4653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527938	2539310	2539291	275877	275859	SPCC285.17	SPCC757.10	spp27	vph2	uaf30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527939	2538913	2539291	275490	275859	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC757.10	ccr4	vph2	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.2977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527940	2539444	2539291	276007	275859	SPCC576.13	SPCC757.10	swc5	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527941	2539483	2539291	276046	275859	SPCC584.02	SPCC757.10	cuf2	vph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527942	2542363	2538825	278827	275406	SPAC1783.05	SPCC757.12	hrp1	SPCC757.12	chd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527943	2540320	2538825	276850	275406	SPBC3D6.04c	SPCC757.12	mad1	SPCC757.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527944	2542788	2538986	279237	275560	SPAC15A10.15	SPCC895.06	sgo2	elp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527945	2541580	2538986	278077	275560	SPAC1687.05	SPCC895.06	pli1	elp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527946	2542318	2538986	278784	275560	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC895.06	cph1	elp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527947	2542363	2538986	278827	275560	SPAC1783.05	SPCC895.06	hrp1	elp2	chd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527948	2542519	2538986	278977	275560	SPAC19G12.08	SPCC895.06	scs7	elp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527949	2541468	2538986	277970	275560	SPAC1F5.09c	SPCC895.06	shk2	elp2	pak2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527950	2542032	2538986	278514	275560	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC895.06	pnk1	elp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.2482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527951	2541496	2538986	277998	275560	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC895.06	arp42	elp2	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.8919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527952	2541531	2538986	278031	275560	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC895.06	fft3	elp2	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527953	2541578	2538986	278075	275560	SPAC25B8.05	SPCC895.06	deg1	elp2	SPAC25B8.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-25.2329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527954	2541801	2538986	278292	275560	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC895.06	snf5	elp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527955	2543190	2538986	279619	275560	SPAC31F12.01	SPCC895.06	zds1	elp2	SPAC637.14|mug88	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527956	2542592	2538986	279047	275560	SPAC328.01c	SPCC895.06	msn5	elp2	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-20.0015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527957	2543643	2538986	280057	275560	SPAC3G9.07c	SPCC895.06	hos2	elp2	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527958	2543529	2538986	279947	275560	SPAC4C5.02c	SPCC895.06	ryh1	elp2	hos1|sat7	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.7235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527959	2541633	2538986	278129	275560	SPAC664.01c	SPCC895.06	swi6	elp2	SPAC824.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527960	2543563	2538986	279979	275560	SPAC664.02c	SPCC895.06	arp8	elp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527961	2539930	2538986	276474	275560	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC895.06	reb1	elp2	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527962	2539668	2538986	276223	275560	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC895.06	pht1	elp2	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527963	2539876	2538986	276422	275560	SPBC1734.07c	SPCC895.06	trs8502	elp2	SPBC1734.07c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527964	2539999	2538986	276543	275560	SPBC1734.15	SPCC895.06	rsc4	elp2	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527965	2540115	2538986	276652	275560	SPBC1778.02	SPCC895.06	rap1	elp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527966	2539714	2538986	276267	275560	SPBC1861.07	SPCC895.06	SPBC1861.07	elp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527967	2540322	2538986	276852	275560	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC895.06	SPBC31F10.10c	elp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527968	2540968	2538986	277484	275560	SPBC3H7.07c	SPCC895.06	ser2	elp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.2678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527969	2540825	2538986	277343	275560	SPBC428.08c	SPCC895.06	clr4	elp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.2182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527970	2540749	2538986	277271	275560	SPBC4B4.03	SPCC895.06	rsc1	elp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.0742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527971	2540821	2538986	277339	275560	SPBC800.03	SPCC895.06	clr3	elp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.2016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527972	2538801	2538986	275382	275560	SPCC285.13c	SPCC895.06	nup60	elp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527973	2539538	2538986	276100	275560	SPCC364.06	SPCC895.06	nap1	elp2	nap11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527974	2539291	2538986	275859	275560	SPCC757.10	SPCC895.06	vph2	elp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527975	2541642	2539497	278138	276060	SPAC10F6.05c	SPCC895.07	ubc6	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527976	2541535	2539497	278035	276060	SPAC12G12.10	SPCC895.07	wdr21	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527977	2542135	2539497	278611	276060	SPAC13A11.04c	SPCC895.07	ubp8	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527978	2542757	2539497	279207	276060	SPAC13C5.07	SPCC895.07	mre11	alp14	rad32	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.6692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527979	2541650	2539497	278146	276060	SPAC14C4.12c	SPCC895.07	laf1	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527980	2541580	2539497	278077	276060	SPAC1687.05	SPCC895.07	pli1	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.9304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527981	2542111	2539497	278587	276060	SPAC1687.14c	SPCC895.07	SPAC1687.14c	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527982	2542311	2539497	278777	276060	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC895.07	dad1	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.8645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527983	2542318	2539497	278784	276060	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC895.07	cph1	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.3814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527984	2542363	2539497	278827	276060	SPAC1783.05	SPCC895.07	hrp1	alp14	chd1	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527985	2542418	2539497	278881	276060	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC895.07	dad2	alp14	hos2	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.7668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527986	2542239	2539497	278711	276060	SPAC18G6.02c	SPCC895.07	chp1	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.6034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527987	2542123	2539497	278599	276060	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC895.07	mal3	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.3579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527988	2542513	2539497	278971	276060	SPAC1952.05	SPCC895.07	gcn5	alp14	kat2	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.95	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527989	2542466	2539497	278927	276060	SPAC19E9.01c	SPCC895.07	nup40	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.6258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527990	2542237	2539497	278709	276060	SPAC19E9.02	SPCC895.07	fin1	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-18.7148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527991	2542519	2539497	278977	276060	SPAC19G12.08	SPCC895.07	scs7	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.0094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527992	2542126	2539497	278602	276060	SPAC1B3.05	SPCC895.07	not3	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527993	2542007	2539497	278490	276060	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC895.07	rad57	alp14	rhp57|SPAC145.01	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527994	2542023	2539497	278506	276060	SPAC20H4.10	SPCC895.07	ufd2	alp14	SPAC145.04	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527995	2542066	2539497	278543	276060	SPAC227.05	SPCC895.07	SPAC227.05	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.1591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527996	2541498	2539497	278000	276060	SPAC227.10	SPCC895.07	SPAC227.10	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.34	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527997	2541885	2539497	278375	276060	SPAC22H10.03c	SPCC895.07	kap114	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527998	2541496	2539497	277998	276060	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC895.07	arp42	alp14	arp4	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.1753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
527999	2541776	2539497	278270	276060	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC895.07	swd1	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.0219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528000	2541856	2539497	278347	276060	SPAC23H3.08c	SPCC895.07	bub3	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.5066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528001	2541531	2539497	278031	276060	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC895.07	fft3	alp14	snf2SR	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528002	2542732	2539497	279182	276060	SPAC25G10.07c	SPCC895.07	cut7	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.8478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528003	2541614	2539497	278111	276060	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC895.07	elp3	alp14	kat9	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.4199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528004	2542094	2539497	278571	276060	SPAC29B12.06c	SPCC895.07	rcd1	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.3313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528005	2541672	2539497	278168	276060	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC895.07	lsk1	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.9357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528006	2541710	2539497	278205	276060	SPAC343.11c	SPCC895.07	msc1	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528007	2543106	2539497	279538	276060	SPAC3A11.13	SPCC895.07	SPAC3A11.13	alp14	SPAC3H5.02	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.8202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528008	2543452	2539497	279872	276060	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC895.07	ssu72	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528009	2543443	2539497	279863	276060	SPAC3H1.12c	SPCC895.07	snt2	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528010	2543378	2539497	279800	276060	SPAC3H8.07c	SPCC895.07	pac10	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.1095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528011	2543619	2539497	280033	276060	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC895.07	ypa1	alp14	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.4856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528012	2543516	2539497	279934	276060	SPAC4F10.11	SPCC895.07	spn1	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528013	2541633	2539497	278129	276060	SPAC664.01c	SPCC895.07	swi6	alp14	SPAC824.10c	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.8358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528014	2543563	2539497	279979	276060	SPAC664.02c	SPCC895.07	arp8	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.6292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528015	2543226	2539497	279654	276060	SPAC6B12.05c	SPCC895.07	ies2	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528016	2543567	2539497	279983	276060	SPAC890.03	SPCC895.07	ppk16	alp14	mug92	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.3524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528017	2543341	2539497	279764	276060	SPAC8E11.07c	SPCC895.07	alp31	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-18.3564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528018	2543289	2539497	279714	276060	SPAC9E9.08	SPCC895.07	rad26	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528019	2542192	2539497	278667	276060	SPAC9G1.12	SPCC895.07	cpd1	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528020	2543387	2539497	279809	276060	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC895.07	mcl1	alp14	slr3	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528021	2540060	2539497	276598	276060	SPBC106.01	SPCC895.07	mph1	alp14	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-18.7015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528022	2539812	2539497	276362	276060	SPBC1347.02	SPCC895.07	fkbp39	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528023	2540154	2539497	276690	276060	SPBC16C6.05	SPCC895.07	SPBC16C6.05	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.7714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528024	2539925	2539497	276469	276060	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC895.07	SPBC16H5.13	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528025	2539999	2539497	276543	276060	SPBC1734.15	SPCC895.07	rsc4	alp14	brd1	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.9698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528026	2539714	2539497	276267	276060	SPBC1861.07	SPCC895.07	SPBC1861.07	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.1951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528027	2540822	2539497	277340	276060	SPBC18E5.05c	SPCC895.07	elp5	alp14	iki1	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.6223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528028	2540788	2539497	277307	276060	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC895.07	swd2	alp14	swd2.1	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.7395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528029	2540787	2539497	277306	276060	SPBC1921.07c	SPCC895.07	sgf29	alp14	SPBC21D10.13	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.9707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528030	2540765	2539497	277285	276060	SPBC1D7.01	SPCC895.07	pfd1	alp14	SPBC1D7.01	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.9497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528031	2540612	2539497	277138	276060	SPBC1D7.05	SPCC895.07	byr2	alp14	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528032	2540589	2539497	277115	276060	SPBC20F10.06	SPCC895.07	mad2	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.8068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528033	2540664	2539497	277189	276060	SPBC215.02	SPCC895.07	bob1	alp14	gim5	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.2541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528034	2540686	2539497	277211	276060	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC895.07	bdc1	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.4245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528035	2540680	2539497	277205	276060	SPBC26H8.05c	SPCC895.07	pph3	alp14	SPBC26H8.05c	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.7198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528036	2540436	2539497	276964	276060	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC895.07	ngg1	alp14	ada3|kap1	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.5813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528037	2540512	2539497	277040	276060	SPBC29A3.05	SPCC895.07	vps71	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.9308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528038	2540346	2539497	276875	276060	SPBC2F12.03c	SPCC895.07	ebs1	alp14	SPBC2F12.03c	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.0296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528039	2540322	2539497	276852	276060	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC895.07	SPBC31F10.10c	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528040	2540396	2539497	276924	276060	SPBC31F10.12	SPCC895.07	tma20	alp14	SPBC31F10.12	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.0384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528041	2540219	2539497	276752	276060	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC895.07	hip1	alp14	hir1	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528042	2540251	2539497	276783	276060	SPBC336.05c	SPCC895.07	SPBC336.05c	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528043	2540220	2539497	276753	276060	SPBC337.03	SPCC895.07	rhn1	alp14	SPBC337.03|iss4	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528044	2540967	2539497	277483	276060	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC895.07	SPBC36B7.08c	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.3209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528045	2540825	2539497	277343	276060	SPBC428.08c	SPCC895.07	clr4	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.1573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528046	2540999	2539497	277515	276060	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC895.07	SPBC4B4.04	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528047	2539847	2539497	276395	276060	SPBC530.14c	SPCC895.07	dsk1	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528048	2540913	2539497	277429	276060	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC895.07	SPBC56F2.08c	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528049	2541088	2539497	277603	276060	SPBC609.05	SPCC895.07	pob3	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528050	2540821	2539497	277339	276060	SPBC800.03	SPCC895.07	clr3	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528051	2540936	2539497	277452	276060	SPBC800.05c	SPCC895.07	atb2	alp14	alp2|ban5|tub1	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528052	2540735	2539497	277258	276060	SPBC83.03c	SPCC895.07	tas3	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.3287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528053	2541270	2539497	277784	276060	SPBC902.02c	SPCC895.07	ctf18	alp14	chl12	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-20.3863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528054	2541284	2539497	277797	276060	SPBC947.08c	SPCC895.07	hip4	alp14	hpc2	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.0098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528055	2541287	2539497	277800	276060	SPBP22H7.05c	SPCC895.07	abo2	alp14	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528056	2541349	2539497	277860	276060	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC895.07	air1	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528057	2541337	2539497	277848	276060	SPBP35G2.13c	SPCC895.07	swc2	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528058	2539079	2539497	275651	276060	SPCC1223.01	SPCC895.07	SPCC1223.01	alp14	SPCC285.18	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528059	2538946	2539497	275520	276060	SPCC162.11c	SPCC895.07	SPCC162.11c	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.2875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528060	2539248	2539497	275818	276060	SPCC1739.03	SPCC895.07	hrr1	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.0722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528061	2538966	2539497	275540	276060	SPCC18.10	SPCC895.07	SPCC18.10	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528062	2539145	2539497	275717	276060	SPCC18.11c	SPCC895.07	sdc1	alp14	dpy30	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.7451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528063	2539319	2539497	275885	276060	SPCC1919.13c	SPCC895.07	SPCC1919.13c	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528064	2538801	2539497	275382	276060	SPCC285.13c	SPCC895.07	nup60	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528065	2539310	2539497	275877	276060	SPCC285.17	SPCC895.07	spp27	alp14	uaf30	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.1898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528066	2538762	2539497	275345	276060	SPCC306.04c	SPCC895.07	set1	alp14	kmt2	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.0715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528067	2539375	2539497	275941	276060	SPCC4G3.11	SPCC895.07	mug154	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.4643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528068	2538778	2539497	275359	276060	SPCC4G3.15c	SPCC895.07	not2	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.7269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528069	2539444	2539497	276007	276060	SPCC576.13	SPCC895.07	swc5	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.1948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528070	2539023	2539497	275596	276060	SPCC594.05c	SPCC895.07	spf1	alp14	spp1	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-21.5418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528071	2538848	2539497	275429	276060	SPCC613.12c	SPCC895.07	raf1	alp14	clr8|cmc1|dos1	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.3405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528072	2539568	2539497	276128	276060	SPCC663.05c	SPCC895.07	cia1	alp14	asf1	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528073	2539403	2539497	275968	276060	SPCC736.11	SPCC895.07	ago1	alp14	csp9	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.1095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528074	2539291	2539497	275859	276060	SPCC757.10	SPCC895.07	vph2	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528075	2541628	2539420	278124	275985	SPAC110.02	SPCC970.07c	pds5	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528076	3361561	2539420	280637	275985	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC970.07c	swr1	raf2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528077	2542757	2539420	279207	275985	SPAC13C5.07	SPCC970.07c	mre11	raf2	rad32	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.2772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528078	2541650	2539420	278146	275985	SPAC14C4.12c	SPCC970.07c	laf1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528079	2542788	2539420	279237	275985	SPAC15A10.15	SPCC970.07c	sgo2	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528080	2542311	2539420	278777	275985	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC970.07c	dad1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528081	2542318	2539420	278784	275985	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC970.07c	cph1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.5617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528082	2542277	2539420	278746	275985	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC970.07c	dbr1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.6094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528083	2542207	2539420	278682	275985	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC970.07c	ddb1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528084	2542418	2539420	278881	275985	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC970.07c	dad2	raf2	hos2	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528085	2542123	2539420	278599	275985	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC970.07c	mal3	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.2937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528086	2542568	2539420	279024	275985	SPAC1952.02	SPCC970.07c	tma23	raf2	SPAC1952.02	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.0121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528087	2542513	2539420	278971	275985	SPAC1952.05	SPCC970.07c	gcn5	raf2	kat2	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528088	2542237	2539420	278709	275985	SPAC19E9.02	SPCC970.07c	fin1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.5009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528089	2542007	2539420	278490	275985	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC970.07c	rad57	raf2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528090	2542023	2539420	278506	275985	SPAC20H4.10	SPCC970.07c	ufd2	raf2	SPAC145.04	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528091	2541786	2539420	278278	275985	SPAC22F3.08c	SPCC970.07c	rok1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528092	2541496	2539420	277998	275985	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC970.07c	arp42	raf2	arp4	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.3933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528093	2541856	2539420	278347	275985	SPAC23H3.08c	SPCC970.07c	bub3	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.4984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528094	2541614	2539420	278111	275985	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC970.07c	elp3	raf2	kat9	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.2014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528095	2541672	2539420	278168	275985	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC970.07c	lsk1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.8597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528096	2543118	2539420	279550	275985	SPAC3G6.11	SPCC970.07c	chl1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.0716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528097	2543619	2539420	280033	275985	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC970.07c	ypa1	raf2	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-20.917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528098	2543384	2539420	279806	275985	SPAC637.06	SPCC970.07c	gmh5	raf2	SPAC637.06	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528099	2543580	2539420	279995	275985	SPAC644.14c	SPCC970.07c	rad51	raf2	rhp51	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.9846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528100	2543240	2539420	279668	275985	SPAC694.06c	SPCC970.07c	mrc1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.0986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528101	2543226	2539420	279654	275985	SPAC6B12.05c	SPCC970.07c	ies2	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528102	2543567	2539420	279983	275985	SPAC890.03	SPCC970.07c	ppk16	raf2	mug92	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528103	2543341	2539420	279764	275985	SPAC8E11.07c	SPCC970.07c	alp31	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-18.8869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528104	2543668	2539420	280082	275985	SPAC9.05	SPCC970.07c	fml1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528105	2542192	2539420	278667	275985	SPAC9G1.12	SPCC970.07c	cpd1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528106	2543372	2539420	279794	275985	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC970.07c	ase1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.7889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528107	2543387	2539420	279809	275985	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC970.07c	mcl1	raf2	slr3	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.5553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528108	2543670	2539420	280084	275985	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPCC970.07c	eme1	raf2	mms4|slx2	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.9889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528109	2540060	2539420	276598	275985	SPBC106.01	SPCC970.07c	mph1	raf2	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-19.7175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528110	2539668	2539420	276223	275985	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC970.07c	pht1	raf2	pi001	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528111	2539651	2539420	276206	275985	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC970.07c	srb11	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528112	2539812	2539420	276362	275985	SPBC1347.02	SPCC970.07c	fkbp39	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-17.8037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528113	2539960	2539420	276504	275985	SPBC15D4.15	SPCC970.07c	pho2	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.4687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528114	2540822	2539420	277340	275985	SPBC18E5.05c	SPCC970.07c	elp5	raf2	iki1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.6985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528115	2540589	2539420	277115	275985	SPBC20F10.06	SPCC970.07c	mad2	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528116	2540317	2539420	276847	275985	SPBC24C6.05	SPCC970.07c	sec28	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528117	2540680	2539420	277205	275985	SPBC26H8.05c	SPCC970.07c	pph3	raf2	SPBC26H8.05c	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.7255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528118	2540498	2539420	277026	275985	SPBC27.02c	SPCC970.07c	ask1	raf2	mug181	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528119	2540436	2539420	276964	275985	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC970.07c	ngg1	raf2	ada3|kap1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528120	2540512	2539420	277040	275985	SPBC29A3.05	SPCC970.07c	vps71	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528121	2540354	2539420	276883	275985	SPBC29A3.13	SPCC970.07c	pdp1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528122	3361323	2539420	280399	275985	SPBC30D10.04	SPCC970.07c	swi3	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528123	2540219	2539420	276752	275985	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC970.07c	hip1	raf2	hir1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528124	2540945	2539420	277461	275985	SPBC342.06c	SPCC970.07c	rtt109	raf2	kat11	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528125	2540929	2539420	277445	275985	SPBC354.03	SPCC970.07c	swd3	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528126	2541017	2539420	277532	275985	SPBC36.07	SPCC970.07c	elp1	raf2	iki3	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.9905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528127	2540320	2539420	276850	275985	SPBC3D6.04c	SPCC970.07c	mad1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528128	2540968	2539420	277484	275985	SPBC3H7.07c	SPCC970.07c	ser2	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.3173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528129	2540979	2539420	277495	275985	SPBC3H7.10	SPCC970.07c	elp6	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-19.2502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528130	2540893	2539420	277409	275985	SPBC543.10	SPCC970.07c	get1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528131	2541062	2539420	277577	275985	SPBC660.11	SPCC970.07c	tcg1	raf2	mug187	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528132	2540821	2539420	277339	275985	SPBC800.03	SPCC970.07c	clr3	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528133	2540936	2539420	277452	275985	SPBC800.05c	SPCC970.07c	atb2	raf2	alp2|ban5|tub1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-16.0945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528134	2540829	2539420	277347	275985	SPBC800.09	SPCC970.07c	sum2	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528135	2541284	2539420	277797	275985	SPBC947.08c	SPCC970.07c	hip4	raf2	hpc2	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528136	2541251	2539420	277765	275985	SPBC947.10	SPCC970.07c	dsc1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528137	2541287	2539420	277800	275985	SPBP22H7.05c	SPCC970.07c	abo2	raf2	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528138	2541349	2539420	277860	275985	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC970.07c	air1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.9579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528139	2538987	2539420	275561	275985	SPCC11E10.06c	SPCC970.07c	elp4	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.9557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528140	2539252	2539420	275822	275985	SPCC1223.11	SPCC970.07c	ptc2	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528141	2538906	2539420	275483	275985	SPCC1259.03	SPCC970.07c	rpa12	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528142	2538868	2539420	275448	275985	SPCC132.02	SPCC970.07c	hst2	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528143	2538946	2539420	275520	275985	SPCC162.11c	SPCC970.07c	SPCC162.11c	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528144	2539041	2539420	275614	275985	SPCC18.06c	SPCC970.07c	caf1	raf2	pop2	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.5948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528145	2539319	2539420	275885	275985	SPCC1919.13c	SPCC970.07c	SPCC1919.13c	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528146	2539215	2539420	275785	275985	SPCC285.16c	SPCC970.07c	msh6	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.5352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528147	2539564	2539420	276125	275985	SPCC550.12	SPCC970.07c	arp6	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528148	2539444	2539420	276007	275985	SPCC576.13	SPCC970.07c	swc5	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528149	2538986	2539420	275560	275985	SPCC895.06	SPCC970.07c	elp2	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.0934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528150	2539497	2539420	276060	275985	SPCC895.07	SPCC970.07c	alp14	raf2	mtc1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.2992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528151	2542036	2539473	278518	276036	SPAC23A1.19c	SPCP25A2.02c	hrq1	rhp26	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528152	2543423	2539473	279844	276036	SPAC4H3.07c	SPCP25A2.02c	SPAC4H3.07c	rhp26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528153	2539911	2539473	276456	276036	SPBC15D4.10c	SPCP25A2.02c	amo1	rhp26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528154	2539714	2539473	276267	276036	SPBC1861.07	SPCP25A2.02c	SPBC1861.07	rhp26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528155	2541120	2539473	277635	276036	SPBC649.03	SPCP25A2.02c	rhp14	rhp26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528156	2540679	2539579	277204	276138	SPBC3D6.10	SPCP31B10.05	apn2	tdp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528157	2540893	2539579	277409	276138	SPBC543.10	SPCP31B10.05	get1	tdp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528158	2541088	2539579	277603	276138	SPBC609.05	SPCP31B10.05	pob3	tdp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528159	2540893	2539441	277409	276004	SPBC543.10	SPCPJ732.02c	get1	xks1	-	SPCPJ732.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.1597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528160	2539209	2539441	275779	276004	SPCC23B6.03c	SPCPJ732.02c	tel1	xks1	-	SPCPJ732.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528161	3361433	2541628	280509	278124	SPAC1071.12c	SPAC110.02	stp1	pds5	SPAC926.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528162	2543263	3361561	279691	280637	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC11E3.01c	med6	swr1	pmc5	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528163	2543263	2542135	279691	278611	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC13A11.04c	med6	ubp8	pmc5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528164	2541575	2542757	278072	279207	SPAC12B10.01c	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC12B10.01c	mre11	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	rad32	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528165	2542833	2542809	279280	279257	SPAC13F5.01c	SPAC15A10.11	msh1	ubr11	SPAC23C11.18c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528166	3361401	2542764	280477	279214	SPAC1093.03	SPAC15E1.10	SPAC1093.03	SPAC15E1.10	-	SPAP7G5.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528167	2541536	2541529	278036	278029	SPAC1071.02	SPAC1687.13c	mms19	csn5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528168	2541628	2541529	278124	278029	SPAC110.02	SPAC1687.13c	pds5	csn5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528169	2541628	2542309	278124	278775	SPAC110.02	SPAC16A10.02	pds5	sub1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528170	2542757	2542309	279207	278775	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC16A10.02	mre11	sub1	rad32	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528171	3361456	2542318	280532	278784	SPAC1142.03c	SPAC16C9.05	swi2	cph1	SPAC17G6.20c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528172	5802929	2542318	858067	278784	SPAC1556.08c	SPAC16C9.05	cbs2	cph1	SPAC1F12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528173	3361401	2542363	280477	278827	SPAC1093.03	SPAC1783.05	SPAC1093.03	hrp1	-	chd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528174	3361401	2542440	280477	278902	SPAC1093.03	SPAC17A2.12	SPAC1093.03	rrp1	-	SPAC17A2.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528175	3361401	2542252	280477	278722	SPAC1093.03	SPAC17A2.13c	SPAC1093.03	rad25	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528176	2542925	2542277	279366	278746	SPAC11E3.04c	SPAC17A5.02c	ubc13	dbr1	spu13|sst5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528177	2542135	2542277	278611	278746	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC17A5.02c	ubp8	dbr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528178	2542925	2542168	279366	278643	SPAC11E3.04c	SPAC17A5.16	ubc13	ftp105	spu13|sst5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.3171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528179	2542300	2542168	278767	278643	SPAC1687.22c	SPAC17A5.16	puf3	ftp105	SPAC222.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528180	2542311	2542168	278777	278643	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC17A5.16	dad1	ftp105	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528181	2542757	2542141	279207	278617	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC17C9.05c	mre11	pmc3	rad32	med27|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.6638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528182	2542135	2542421	278611	278884	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC17G8.05	ubp8	med20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.7135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528183	2542764	2542421	279214	278884	SPAC15E1.10	SPAC17G8.05	SPAC15E1.10	med20	SPAP7G5.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528184	2542440	2542421	278902	278884	SPAC17A2.12	SPAC17G8.05	rrp1	med20	SPAC17A2.12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528185	2542289	2542421	278757	278884	SPAC17G6.03	SPAC17G8.05	SPAC17G6.03	med20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.52	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528186	2541642	2542278	278138	278747	SPAC10F6.05c	SPAC17G8.07	ubc6	yaf9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528187	3361561	2542278	280637	278747	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC17G8.07	swr1	yaf9	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528188	2541536	2542170	278036	278645	SPAC1071.02	SPAC17G8.13c	mms19	mst2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528189	2541642	2542418	278138	278881	SPAC10F6.05c	SPAC1805.07c	ubc6	dad2	-	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528190	2541575	2542418	278072	278881	SPAC12B10.01c	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC12B10.01c	dad2	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528191	2542141	2542418	278617	278881	SPAC17C9.05c	SPAC1805.07c	pmc3	dad2	med27|prk1	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528192	2542421	2542467	278884	278928	SPAC17G8.05	SPAC1834.04	med20	hht1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528193	2541536	2542239	278036	278711	SPAC1071.02	SPAC18G6.02c	mms19	chp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528194	2542363	2542513	278827	278971	SPAC1783.05	SPAC1952.05	hrp1	gcn5	chd1	kat2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528195	2542757	2542555	279207	279012	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC1952.06c	mre11	SPAC1952.06c	rad32	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528196	2542207	2542555	278682	279012	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC1952.06c	ddb1	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528197	2542767	2542127	279217	278603	SPAC1565.07c	SPAC1952.12c	knd1	csn71	SPAC1565.07c	csn7|csn7a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528198	2541642	2542469	278138	278930	SPAC10F6.05c	SPAC19A8.04	ubc6	erg5	-	cyp61	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528199	2542421	2542462	278884	278923	SPAC17G8.05	SPAC19B12.11c	med20	SPAC19B12.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.6279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528200	2541536	2542237	278036	278709	SPAC1071.02	SPAC19E9.02	mms19	fin1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528201	2543263	2542519	279691	278977	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC19G12.08	med6	scs7	pmc5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528202	2541642	2542519	278138	278977	SPAC10F6.05c	SPAC19G12.08	ubc6	scs7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.7025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528203	2541653	2542519	278149	278977	SPAC11D3.07c	SPAC19G12.08	toe4	scs7	SPAC11D3.07c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528204	3361561	2542519	280637	278977	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC19G12.08	swr1	scs7	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528205	2542925	2542519	279366	278977	SPAC11E3.04c	SPAC19G12.08	ubc13	scs7	spu13|sst5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528206	2541762	2542519	278256	278977	SPAC139.01c	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC139.01c	scs7	SPAC955.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528207	2542135	2542519	278611	278977	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC19G12.08	ubp8	scs7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.1887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528208	2542861	2542519	279307	278977	SPAC13G7.13c	SPAC19G12.08	msa1	scs7	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528209	2542902	2542519	279346	278977	SPAC144.05	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC144.05	scs7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528210	2542300	2542519	278767	278977	SPAC1687.22c	SPAC19G12.08	puf3	scs7	SPAC222.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.37	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528211	2542349	2542519	278814	278977	SPAC1782.05	SPAC19G12.08	ypa2	scs7	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528212	2542363	2542519	278827	278977	SPAC1783.05	SPAC19G12.08	hrp1	scs7	chd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.5836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528213	2542277	2542519	278746	278977	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC19G12.08	dbr1	scs7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528214	2542522	2542519	278980	278977	SPAC19A8.03	SPAC19G12.08	ymr1	scs7	SPAC19A8.03	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528215	2542469	2542519	278930	278977	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC19G12.08	erg5	scs7	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.9141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528216	2542421	2542550	278884	279007	SPAC17G8.05	SPAC1B3.02c	med20	SPAC1B3.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528217	2542418	2542550	278881	279007	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC1B3.02c	dad2	SPAC1B3.02c	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528218	2542519	2542126	278977	278602	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC1B3.05	scs7	not3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.9787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528219	2542168	2542459	278643	278920	SPAC17A5.16	SPAC1D4.03c	ftp105	aut12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528220	2542519	2542459	278977	278920	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC1D4.03c	scs7	aut12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528221	2542519	2541468	278977	277970	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC1F5.09c	scs7	shk2	-	pak2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.0446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528222	2542318	2541846	278784	278337	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC20G4.01	cph1	caf16	-	SPAC22F8.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528223	2542459	2542007	278920	278490	SPAC1D4.03c	SPAC20H4.07	aut12	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528224	2542195	2541943	278670	278430	SPAC1834.07	SPAC222.07c	klp3	hri2	krp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528225	3361433	3361533	280509	280609	SPAC1071.12c	SPAC222.15	stp1	meu13	SPAC926.01c	SPAC821.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528226	3361401	3361533	280477	280609	SPAC1093.03	SPAC222.15	SPAC1093.03	meu13	-	SPAC821.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528227	2543263	2541498	279691	278000	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC227.10	med6	SPAC227.10	pmc5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.8933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528228	2542809	2541498	279257	278000	SPAC15A10.11	SPAC227.10	ubr11	SPAC227.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528229	2542519	2541498	278977	278000	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC227.10	scs7	SPAC227.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528230	2542519	2541899	278977	278389	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC22E12.11c	scs7	set3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.3253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528231	2542519	2541798	278977	278289	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC22F3.03c	scs7	rdh54	-	mug34|tid1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.6819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528232	5802929	2541871	858067	278361	SPAC1556.08c	SPAC22F3.09c	cbs2	res2	SPAC1F12.01c	mcs1|pct1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528233	2542278	2541871	278747	278361	SPAC17G8.07	SPAC22F3.09c	yaf9	res2	-	mcs1|pct1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528234	2542555	2541871	279012	278361	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC1952.06c	res2	-	mcs1|pct1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528235	2542519	2541871	278977	278361	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC22F3.09c	scs7	res2	-	mcs1|pct1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528236	2542541	2541871	278998	278361	SPAC1B3.03c	SPAC22F3.09c	wis2	res2	cyp5	mcs1|pct1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.37	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528237	2542126	2541871	278602	278361	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC22F3.09c	not3	res2	-	mcs1|pct1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528238	2542418	2541979	278881	278464	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC23A1.07	dad2	SPAC23A1.07	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528239	2542123	2541979	278599	278464	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC23A1.07	mal3	SPAC23A1.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528240	2542541	2542036	278998	278518	SPAC1B3.03c	SPAC23A1.19c	wis2	hrq1	cyp5	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528241	2542135	2542032	278611	278514	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC23C11.04c	ubp8	pnk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528242	2542318	2542032	278784	278514	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC23C11.04c	cph1	pnk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528243	2542513	2542032	278971	278514	SPAC1952.05	SPAC23C11.04c	gcn5	pnk1	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528244	2542555	2542032	279012	278514	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC1952.06c	pnk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528245	2542833	2541929	279280	278417	SPAC13F5.01c	SPAC23C4.12	msh1	hhp2	SPAC23C11.18c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528246	2541535	2541496	278035	277998	SPAC12G12.10	SPAC23D3.09	wdr21	arp42	-	arp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528247	3361391	2541496	280467	277998	SPAC13G6.01c	SPAC23D3.09	rad8	arp42	SPAC5H10.14c	arp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528248	2542568	2541438	279024	277943	SPAC1952.02	SPAC23G3.10c	tma23	ssr3	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528249	2542462	2541438	278923	277943	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC23G3.10c	SPAC19B12.11c	ssr3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528250	2542519	2541438	278977	277943	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC23G3.10c	scs7	ssr3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528251	2542318	2541776	278784	278270	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC23H3.05c	cph1	swd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.4225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528252	2542757	2541789	279207	278281	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC23H4.08	mre11	iwr1	rad32	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528253	2542418	2541789	278881	278281	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC23H4.08	dad2	iwr1	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528254	2542568	2541789	279024	278281	SPAC1952.02	SPAC23H4.08	tma23	iwr1	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528255	2541786	2541789	278278	278281	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC23H4.08	rok1	iwr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528256	2541871	2541789	278361	278281	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC23H4.08	res2	iwr1	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528257	2541871	2541531	278361	278031	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC25A8.01c	res2	fft3	mcs1|pct1	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528258	2542418	2541578	278881	278075	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC25B8.05	dad2	deg1	hos2	SPAC25B8.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528259	2542757	2542662	279207	279115	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC25B8.07c	mre11	SPAC25B8.07c	rad32	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528260	2543263	2542086	279691	278563	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC25H1.02	med6	jmj1	pmc5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528261	3361401	2542667	280477	279120	SPAC1093.03	SPAC26A3.16	SPAC1093.03	dph1	-	ucp5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528262	2541628	2542081	278124	278558	SPAC110.02	SPAC26H5.04	pds5	SPAC26H5.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528263	2542300	2542701	278767	279154	SPAC1687.22c	SPAC26H5.05	puf3	mga2	SPAC222.02c	SPAC26H5.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.5722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528264	2542555	2542701	279012	279154	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC26H5.05	SPAC1952.06c	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528265	2541786	2542701	278278	279154	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC26H5.05	rok1	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528266	2541871	2542701	278361	279154	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC26H5.05	res2	mga2	mcs1|pct1	SPAC26H5.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528267	2541776	2542701	278270	279154	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC26H5.05	swd1	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.6006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528268	2541531	2542701	278031	279154	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC26H5.05	fft3	mga2	snf2SR	SPAC26H5.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.2923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528269	2542318	3361403	278784	280479	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC27D7.12c	cph1	but1	-	SPAC27D7.12|mug107|prx	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.4765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528270	2541468	3361403	277970	280479	SPAC1F5.09c	SPAC27D7.12c	shk2	but1	pak2	SPAC27D7.12|mug107|prx	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528271	2542833	2541733	279280	278227	SPAC13F5.01c	SPAC27F1.03c	msh1	uch1	SPAC23C11.18c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528272	2542135	2541614	278611	278111	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC29A4.20	ubp8	elp3	-	kat9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528273	5802929	2541614	858067	278111	SPAC1556.08c	SPAC29A4.20	cbs2	elp3	SPAC1F12.01c	kat9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528274	2543263	2542094	279691	278571	SPAC1002.15c	SPAC29B12.06c	med6	rcd1	pmc5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528275	2541628	2542094	278124	278571	SPAC110.02	SPAC29B12.06c	pds5	rcd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528276	2542032	2542094	278514	278571	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC29B12.06c	pnk1	rcd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528277	2542925	2541672	279366	278168	SPAC11E3.04c	SPAC2F3.15	ubc13	lsk1	spu13|sst5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.4177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528278	2541575	2541672	278072	278168	SPAC12B10.01c	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC12B10.01c	lsk1	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528279	2542902	2541672	279346	278168	SPAC144.05	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC144.05	lsk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528280	2542311	2541672	278777	278168	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC2F3.15	dad1	lsk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528281	2542318	2541672	278784	278168	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC2F3.15	cph1	lsk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528282	2542418	2541672	278881	278168	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC2F3.15	dad2	lsk1	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528283	2542459	2541672	278920	278168	SPAC1D4.03c	SPAC2F3.15	aut12	lsk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.5588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528284	2541468	2541672	277970	278168	SPAC1F5.09c	SPAC2F3.15	shk2	lsk1	pak2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528285	2541941	2541672	278428	278168	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC2F3.15	tfs1	lsk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528286	2542667	2541672	279120	278168	SPAC26A3.16	SPAC2F3.15	dph1	lsk1	ucp5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528287	2542094	2541672	278571	278168	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC2F3.15	rcd1	lsk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.7343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528288	3361401	2541889	280477	278379	SPAC1093.03	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC1093.03	pom1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528289	2542924	2541889	279365	278379	SPAC12B10.04	SPAC2F7.03c	pby1	pom1	SPAC12B10.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528290	2542902	2541889	279346	278379	SPAC144.05	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC144.05	pom1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528291	3361455	2541889	280531	278379	SPAC1782.01	SPAC2F7.03c	ecm29	pom1	SPAPYUG7.07	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528292	2542145	2541889	278621	278379	SPAC17C9.09c	SPAC2F7.03c	tim13	pom1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528293	2542463	2541889	278924	278379	SPAC1834.03c	SPAC2F7.03c	hhf1	pom1	h4.1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528294	2542195	2541889	278670	278379	SPAC1834.07	SPAC2F7.03c	klp3	pom1	krp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528295	2542119	2541889	278595	278379	SPAC1834.08	SPAC2F7.03c	mak1	pom1	phk3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528296	2542555	2541889	279012	278379	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC1952.06c	pom1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528297	2542462	2541889	278923	278379	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC19B12.11c	pom1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528298	2542550	2541889	279007	278379	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC1B3.02c	pom1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528299	2541846	2541889	278337	278379	SPAC20G4.01	SPAC2F7.03c	caf16	pom1	SPAC22F8.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528300	2541728	2541889	278222	278379	SPAC20G4.03c	SPAC2F7.03c	hri1	pom1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528301	2541746	2541889	278240	278379	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC2F7.03c	hus1	pom1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528302	2541903	2541889	278393	278379	SPAC22F8.05	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC22F8.05	pom1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528303	2541733	2541889	278227	278379	SPAC27F1.03c	SPAC2F7.03c	uch1	pom1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528304	2541479	2541889	277981	278379	SPAC27F1.06c	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC27F1.06c	pom1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528305	3361401	2542516	280477	278974	SPAC1093.03	SPAC2F7.04	SPAC1093.03	pmc2	-	med1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.84	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528306	2542519	2542516	278977	278974	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC2F7.04	scs7	pmc2	-	med1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.03	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528307	2541614	2542516	278111	278974	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC2F7.04	elp3	pmc2	kat9	med1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528308	2541746	2541801	278240	278292	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC2F7.08c	hus1	snf5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528309	2542032	2541801	278514	278292	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC2F7.08c	pnk1	snf5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.5032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528310	2542925	2543160	279366	279591	SPAC11E3.04c	SPAC31A2.14	ubc13	bun107	spu13|sst5	wdr48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528311	3361433	2543190	280509	279619	SPAC1071.12c	SPAC31F12.01	stp1	zds1	SPAC926.01c	SPAC637.14|mug88	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528312	2542392	2543190	278856	279619	SPAC19D5.02c	SPAC31F12.01	SPAC19D5.02c	zds1	-	SPAC637.14|mug88	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528313	2542459	2543190	278920	279619	SPAC1D4.03c	SPAC31F12.01	aut12	zds1	-	SPAC637.14|mug88	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528314	2542318	2543101	278784	279533	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC323.03c	cph1	SPAC323.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528315	2542421	2543101	278884	279533	SPAC17G8.05	SPAC323.03c	med20	SPAC323.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528316	2542094	2543101	278571	279533	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC323.03c	rcd1	SPAC323.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528317	2542300	2542592	278767	279047	SPAC1687.22c	SPAC328.01c	puf3	msn5	SPAC222.02c	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528318	2541941	2542592	278428	279047	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC328.01c	tfs1	msn5	-	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528319	2542421	2542567	278884	279023	SPAC17G8.05	SPAC328.05	med20	SPAC328.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528320	2541496	2542059	277998	278537	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC328.06	arp42	ubp2	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528321	3361561	2541710	280637	278205	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC343.11c	swr1	msc1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528322	2542459	2543106	278920	279538	SPAC1D4.03c	SPAC3A11.13	aut12	SPAC3A11.13	-	SPAC3H5.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528323	3361401	2541713	280477	278208	SPAC1093.03	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC1093.03	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528324	2542519	2541713	278977	278208	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC3A12.12	scs7	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528325	2541578	2543044	278075	279479	SPAC25B8.05	SPAC3C7.12	deg1	tip1	SPAC25B8.05	noc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528326	2542421	2543064	278884	279497	SPAC17G8.05	SPAC3G6.01	med20	hrp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528327	2541438	2543064	277943	279497	SPAC23G3.10c	SPAC3G6.01	ssr3	hrp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528328	2541578	2543064	278075	279497	SPAC25B8.05	SPAC3G6.01	deg1	hrp3	SPAC25B8.05	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528329	2543201	2543064	279630	279497	SPAC3F10.15c	SPAC3G6.01	spo12	hrp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528330	2541672	2543164	278168	279595	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC3G6.06c	lsk1	rad2	-	fen1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528331	2541801	2543118	278292	279550	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC3G6.11	snf5	chl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528332	2542300	2543452	278767	279872	SPAC1687.22c	SPAC3G9.04	puf3	ssu72	SPAC222.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528333	2541979	2543452	278464	279872	SPAC23A1.07	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC23A1.07	ssu72	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.06	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528334	2541578	2543452	278075	279872	SPAC25B8.05	SPAC3G9.04	deg1	ssu72	SPAC25B8.05	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528335	2541672	2543452	278168	279872	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC3G9.04	lsk1	ssu72	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.8978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528336	2543064	2543452	279497	279872	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC3G9.04	hrp3	ssu72	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528337	2542770	2543643	279220	280057	SPAC167.07c	SPAC3G9.07c	hul5	hos2	SPAC167.07c|SPAC57A7.03c	hda1|phd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528338	2542519	2543643	278977	280057	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC3G9.07c	scs7	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528339	2542318	2543338	278784	279761	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC458.06	cph1	atg1803	-	SPAC458.06|atg18|atg18c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528340	2541889	2543338	278379	279761	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC458.06	pom1	atg1803	-	SPAC458.06|atg18|atg18c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528341	2541642	2543576	278138	279991	SPAC10F6.05c	SPAC4A8.05c	ubc6	myp2	-	myo3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528342	2541614	2543616	278111	280030	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC4A8.09c	elp3	cwf21	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528343	2542861	2543529	279307	279947	SPAC13G7.13c	SPAC4C5.02c	msa1	ryh1	SPAC6C3.01c	hos1|sat7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528344	2542309	2543529	278775	279947	SPAC16A10.02	SPAC4C5.02c	sub1	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528345	2542440	2543529	278902	279947	SPAC17A2.12	SPAC4C5.02c	rrp1	ryh1	SPAC17A2.12	hos1|sat7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528346	2542295	2543529	278763	279947	SPAC17H9.03c	SPAC4C5.02c	rdl1	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528347	2542513	2543529	278971	279947	SPAC1952.05	SPAC4C5.02c	gcn5	ryh1	kat2	hos1|sat7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528348	2542555	2543529	279012	279947	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC4C5.02c	SPAC1952.06c	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.7092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528349	2542519	2543529	278977	279947	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC4C5.02c	scs7	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528350	2542066	2543529	278543	279947	SPAC227.05	SPAC4C5.02c	SPAC227.05	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.3211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528351	2543101	2543529	279533	279947	SPAC323.03c	SPAC4C5.02c	SPAC323.03c	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528352	2542059	2543529	278537	279947	SPAC328.06	SPAC4C5.02c	ubp2	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.6843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528353	2543106	2543529	279538	279947	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC4C5.02c	SPAC3A11.13	ryh1	SPAC3H5.02	hos1|sat7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.7732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528354	2543378	2543529	279800	279947	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAC4C5.02c	pac10	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.4923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528355	2541536	2543619	278036	280033	SPAC1071.02	SPAC4F10.04	mms19	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528356	2542032	2543619	278514	280033	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC4F10.04	pnk1	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528357	2543452	2543619	279872	280033	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC4F10.04	ssu72	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528358	2542519	2543516	278977	279934	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC4F10.11	scs7	spn1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528359	2542318	2543592	278784	280007	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC4F10.18	cph1	nup37	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.4526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528360	2541889	2543592	278379	280007	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC4F10.18	pom1	nup37	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528361	2542833	2543667	279280	280081	SPAC13F5.01c	SPAC4H3.02c	msh1	swc3	SPAC23C11.18c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528362	2541614	2543667	278111	280081	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC4H3.02c	elp3	swc3	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528363	2543064	2543667	279497	280081	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC4H3.02c	hrp3	swc3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528364	2543036	2543577	279471	279992	SPAC3A12.03c	SPAC4H3.05	meu34	srs2	mug145	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528365	2542277	2543423	278746	279844	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC4H3.07c	dbr1	SPAC4H3.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528366	2542833	2542878	279280	279323	SPAC13F5.01c	SPAC57A10.09c	msh1	nhp6	SPAC23C11.18c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528367	2542519	2542878	278977	279323	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC57A10.09c	scs7	nhp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528368	2542555	2542571	279012	279027	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC589.02c	SPAC1952.06c	med13	-	spTrap240|srb9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528369	2541496	2542571	277998	279027	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC589.02c	arp42	med13	arp4	spTrap240|srb9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528370	3361561	2542180	280637	278655	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC589.07c	swr1	atg1801	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	atg18|atg18a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528371	2542833	2542180	279280	278655	SPAC13F5.01c	SPAC589.07c	msh1	atg1801	SPAC23C11.18c	atg18|atg18a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528372	2542513	2542180	278971	278655	SPAC1952.05	SPAC589.07c	gcn5	atg1801	kat2	atg18|atg18a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528373	3361533	2542180	280609	278655	SPAC222.15	SPAC589.07c	meu13	atg1801	SPAC821.01	atg18|atg18a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528374	2541614	2542180	278111	278655	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC589.07c	elp3	atg1801	kat9	atg18|atg18a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528375	2543529	2542180	279947	278655	SPAC4C5.02c	SPAC589.07c	ryh1	atg1801	hos1|sat7	atg18|atg18a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528376	2543619	2542180	280033	278655	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC589.07c	ypa1	atg1801	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	atg18|atg18a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528377	2541496	2543414	277998	279836	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC630.10	arp42	SPAC630.10	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528378	2542519	2543426	278977	279846	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC631.02	scs7	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528379	2541871	2543426	278361	279846	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC631.02	res2	bdf2	mcs1|pct1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528380	2543064	2543426	279497	279846	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC631.02	hrp3	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528381	3361561	2543384	280637	279806	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC637.06	swr1	gmh5	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528382	2541529	2543384	278029	279806	SPAC1687.13c	SPAC637.06	csn5	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528383	2542109	2543384	278585	279806	SPAC1687.16c	SPAC637.06	erg31	gmh5	erg3	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528384	2542318	2543384	278784	279806	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC637.06	cph1	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528385	2542278	2543384	278747	279806	SPAC17G8.07	SPAC637.06	yaf9	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528386	2542459	2543384	278920	279806	SPAC1D4.03c	SPAC637.06	aut12	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.2816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528387	2541941	2543384	278428	279806	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC637.06	tfs1	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.8839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528388	2542066	2543384	278543	279806	SPAC227.05	SPAC637.06	SPAC227.05	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528389	2541789	2543384	278281	279806	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC637.06	iwr1	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.0698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528390	2542094	2543384	278571	279806	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC637.06	rcd1	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.8459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528391	2541801	2543384	278292	279806	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC637.06	snf5	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.1067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528392	2542059	2543384	278537	279806	SPAC328.06	SPAC637.06	ubp2	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528393	2543106	2543384	279538	279806	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC637.06	SPAC3A11.13	gmh5	SPAC3H5.02	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528394	2543044	2543384	279479	279806	SPAC3C7.12	SPAC637.06	tip1	gmh5	noc1	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528395	2543686	2543384	280100	279806	SPAC3C7.14c	SPAC637.06	obr1	gmh5	apt1|uhp1|p25	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528396	2543201	2543384	279630	279806	SPAC3F10.15c	SPAC637.06	spo12	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528397	2543452	2543384	279872	279806	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC637.06	ssu72	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528398	2543643	2543384	280057	279806	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC637.06	hos2	gmh5	hda1|phd1	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528399	2543443	2543384	279863	279806	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC637.06	snt2	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528400	2543576	2543384	279991	279806	SPAC4A8.05c	SPAC637.06	myp2	gmh5	myo3	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528401	2542180	2543384	278655	279806	SPAC589.07c	SPAC637.06	atg1801	gmh5	atg18|atg18a	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528402	2542519	2543658	278977	280072	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC644.09	scs7	SPAC644.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528403	2542757	2543580	279207	279995	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC644.14c	mre11	rad51	rad32	rhp51	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528404	2542007	2543580	278490	279995	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC644.14c	rad57	rad51	rhp57|SPAC145.01	rhp51	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528405	2542421	2541633	278884	278129	SPAC17G8.05	SPAC664.01c	med20	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528406	2542135	2543563	278611	279979	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC664.02c	ubp8	arp8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528407	2542513	2543563	278971	279979	SPAC1952.05	SPAC664.02c	gcn5	arp8	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528408	2541642	2543240	278138	279668	SPAC10F6.05c	SPAC694.06c	ubc6	mrc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528409	2541672	2543226	278168	279654	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC6B12.05c	lsk1	ies2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528410	2543529	2543226	279947	279654	SPAC4C5.02c	SPAC6B12.05c	ryh1	ies2	hos1|sat7	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528411	2541642	2543319	278138	279743	SPAC10F6.05c	SPAC6B12.09	ubc6	trm10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528412	2541578	2543319	278075	279743	SPAC25B8.05	SPAC6B12.09	deg1	trm10	SPAC25B8.05	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528413	2541801	2543319	278292	279743	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC6B12.09	snf5	trm10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528414	2543064	2543319	279497	279743	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC6B12.09	hrp3	trm10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528415	2543619	2543319	280033	279743	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC6B12.09	ypa1	trm10	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528416	2541536	2542198	278036	278673	SPAC1071.02	SPAC6F12.09	mms19	rdp1	-	rdr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528417	2542421	2541819	278884	278310	SPAC17G8.05	SPAC6G9.08	med20	ubp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528418	2542519	2543513	278977	279931	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC821.06	scs7	spn2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528419	2543384	2543513	279806	279931	SPAC637.06	SPAC821.06	gmh5	spn2	SPAC637.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.9098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528420	2542135	2542228	278611	278701	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC823.03	ubp8	ppk15	-	SPAC1E11.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528421	2542767	2542228	279217	278701	SPAC1565.07c	SPAC823.03	knd1	ppk15	SPAC1565.07c	SPAC1E11.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528422	2542555	2542228	279012	278701	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC823.03	SPAC1952.06c	ppk15	-	SPAC1E11.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528423	2542519	2542228	278977	278701	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC823.03	scs7	ppk15	-	SPAC1E11.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528424	2543384	2542228	279806	278701	SPAC637.06	SPAC823.03	gmh5	ppk15	SPAC637.06	SPAC1E11.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528425	2542300	2542845	278767	279291	SPAC1687.22c	SPAC824.04	puf3	SPAC824.04	SPAC222.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528426	2542513	2542845	278971	279291	SPAC1952.05	SPAC824.04	gcn5	SPAC824.04	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528427	2542459	2542845	278920	279291	SPAC1D4.03c	SPAC824.04	aut12	SPAC824.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528428	2543619	2542845	280033	279291	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC824.04	ypa1	SPAC824.04	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.2633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528429	2543423	2542845	279844	279291	SPAC4H3.07c	SPAC824.04	SPAC4H3.07c	SPAC824.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528430	2542701	2541834	279154	278325	SPAC26H5.05	SPAC824.08	mga2	gda1	SPAC26H5.05	gdp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528431	2543384	2541834	279806	278325	SPAC637.06	SPAC824.08	gmh5	gda1	SPAC637.06	gdp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528432	2542519	2543567	278977	279983	SPAC19G12.08	SPAC890.03	scs7	ppk16	-	mug92	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528433	2541575	2542102	278072	278578	SPAC12B10.01c	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC12B10.01c	spc34	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528434	3361381	2542102	280457	278578	SPAC12G12.01c	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC12G12.01c	spc34	SPAC630.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528435	2542833	2542102	279280	278578	SPAC13F5.01c	SPAC8C9.17c	msh1	spc34	SPAC23C11.18c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528436	2542170	2542102	278645	278578	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC8C9.17c	mst2	spc34	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528437	2542418	2542102	278881	278578	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC8C9.17c	dad2	spc34	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.5313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528438	2542513	2542102	278971	278578	SPAC1952.05	SPAC8C9.17c	gcn5	spc34	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528439	2542541	2542102	278998	278578	SPAC1B3.03c	SPAC8C9.17c	wis2	spc34	cyp5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528440	2542459	2542102	278920	278578	SPAC1D4.03c	SPAC8C9.17c	aut12	spc34	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.7989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528441	2541903	2542102	278393	278578	SPAC22F8.05	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC22F8.05	spc34	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528442	2541789	2542102	278281	278578	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC8C9.17c	iwr1	spc34	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528443	2541801	2542102	278292	278578	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC8C9.17c	snf5	spc34	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528444	2543619	2542102	280033	278578	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC8C9.17c	ypa1	spc34	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528445	2542032	2543341	278514	279764	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC8E11.07c	pnk1	alp31	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528446	2542023	2543289	278506	279714	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC9E9.08	ufd2	rad26	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528447	2541834	2543289	278325	279714	SPAC824.08	SPAC9E9.08	gda1	rad26	gdp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528448	2542135	2542192	278611	278667	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC9G1.12	ubp8	cpd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528449	2542513	2542192	278971	278667	SPAC1952.05	SPAC9G1.12	gcn5	cpd1	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528450	2542081	2542192	278558	278667	SPAC26H5.04	SPAC9G1.12	SPAC26H5.04	cpd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528451	2542516	2542192	278974	278667	SPAC2F7.04	SPAC9G1.12	pmc2	cpd1	med1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528452	2543592	2542192	280007	278667	SPAC4F10.18	SPAC9G1.12	nup37	cpd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528453	2542519	2542021	278977	278504	SPAC19G12.08	SPAP14E8.02	scs7	tos4	-	SPAP14E8.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528454	2541496	2541657	277998	278153	SPAC23D3.09	SPAP27G11.15	arp42	slx1	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.4408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528455	2542168	2542072	278643	278549	SPAC17A5.16	SPAP32A8.03c	ftp105	bop1	-	SPAP32A8.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528456	2542032	2542072	278514	278549	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAP32A8.03c	pnk1	bop1	-	SPAP32A8.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528457	2541536	2543372	278036	279794	SPAC1071.02	SPAPB1A10.09	mms19	ase1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528458	2542135	2543372	278611	279794	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAPB1A10.09	ubp8	ase1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528459	2542311	2543372	278777	279794	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAPB1A10.09	dad1	ase1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528460	2541871	2543372	278361	279794	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAPB1A10.09	res2	ase1	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528461	2541614	2543372	278111	279794	SPAC29A4.20	SPAPB1A10.09	elp3	ase1	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528462	2542102	2543372	278578	279794	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAPB1A10.09	spc34	ase1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528463	2542318	2543387	278784	279809	SPAC16C9.05	SPAPB1E7.02c	cph1	mcl1	-	slr3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528464	2542141	2543387	278617	279809	SPAC17C9.05c	SPAPB1E7.02c	pmc3	mcl1	med27|prk1	slr3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528465	2542094	2543387	278571	279809	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAPB1E7.02c	rcd1	mcl1	-	slr3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528466	3361433	2543670	280509	280084	SPAC1071.12c	SPAPB1E7.06c	stp1	eme1	SPAC926.01c	mms4|slx2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528467	2541789	2543670	278281	280084	SPAC23H4.08	SPAPB1E7.06c	iwr1	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528468	2542809	2543463	279257	279883	SPAC15A10.11	SPAPB21F2.03	ubr11	slx9	-	SPAPB21F2.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528469	2542833	2541470	279280	277972	SPAC13F5.01c	SPAPYUG7.04c	msh1	rpb9	SPAC23C11.18c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528470	2543529	2541470	279947	277972	SPAC4C5.02c	SPAPYUG7.04c	ryh1	rpb9	hos1|sat7	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528471	2541628	2542933	278124	279374	SPAC110.02	SPAPYUG7.06	pds5	sdu1	-	mug67|hag1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528472	2541889	2542933	278379	279374	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAPYUG7.06	pom1	sdu1	-	mug67|hag1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528473	2542770	2540060	279220	276598	SPAC167.07c	SPBC106.01	hul5	mph1	SPAC167.07c|SPAC57A7.03c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528474	3361401	2539971	280477	276515	SPAC1093.03	SPBC1105.04c	SPAC1093.03	cbp1	-	abp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528475	2541643	2539971	278139	276515	SPAC14C4.13	SPBC1105.04c	rad17	cbp1	-	abp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528476	2542318	2539971	278784	276515	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC1105.04c	cph1	cbp1	-	abp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528477	2542463	2539971	278924	276515	SPAC1834.03c	SPBC1105.04c	hhf1	cbp1	h4.1	abp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528478	2542466	2539971	278927	276515	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC1105.04c	nup40	cbp1	-	abp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528479	2541728	2539971	278222	276515	SPAC20G4.03c	SPBC1105.04c	hri1	cbp1	-	abp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528480	2541867	2539971	278357	276515	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC1105.04c	sck2	cbp1	-	abp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.7253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528481	2542036	2539971	278518	276515	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC1105.04c	hrq1	cbp1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	abp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.8057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528482	2542071	2539971	278548	276515	SPAC26H5.03	SPBC1105.04c	pcf2	cbp1	cac2	abp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528483	2541710	2539971	278205	276515	SPAC343.11c	SPBC1105.04c	msc1	cbp1	-	abp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528484	2543201	2539971	279630	276515	SPAC3F10.15c	SPBC1105.04c	spo12	cbp1	-	abp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528485	2543619	2539971	280033	276515	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC1105.04c	ypa1	cbp1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	abp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.2334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528486	2543432	2539971	279852	276515	SPAC4G8.05	SPBC1105.04c	ppk14	cbp1	-	abp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528487	2543667	2539971	280081	276515	SPAC4H3.02c	SPBC1105.04c	swc3	cbp1	-	abp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528488	2543563	2539971	279979	276515	SPAC664.02c	SPBC1105.04c	arp8	cbp1	-	abp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528489	2543358	2539971	279780	276515	SPAC688.10	SPBC1105.04c	rev3	cbp1	-	abp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528490	2543226	2539971	279654	276515	SPAC6B12.05c	SPBC1105.04c	ies2	cbp1	-	abp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.3015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528491	2542055	2539971	278534	276515	SPAC6G9.03c	SPBC1105.04c	mug183	cbp1	-	abp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528492	2543567	2539971	279983	276515	SPAC890.03	SPBC1105.04c	ppk16	cbp1	mug92	abp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528493	2542106	2539971	278582	276515	SPAC8E11.03c	SPBC1105.04c	dmc1	cbp1	dmp1	abp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528494	2542192	2539971	278667	276515	SPAC9G1.12	SPBC1105.04c	cpd1	cbp1	-	abp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528495	2542300	2539604	278767	276162	SPAC1687.22c	SPBC1105.14	puf3	rsv2	SPAC222.02c	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528496	2541979	2539604	278464	276162	SPAC23A1.07	SPBC1105.14	SPAC23A1.07	rsv2	-	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528497	2543576	2539604	279991	276162	SPAC4A8.05c	SPBC1105.14	myp2	rsv2	myo3	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528498	2543319	2539604	279743	276162	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC1105.14	trm10	rsv2	-	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528499	2542036	2539920	278518	276464	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC119.08	hrq1	pmk1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	spm1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528500	2541672	2539920	278168	276464	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC119.08	lsk1	pmk1	-	spm1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528501	2542180	2539920	278655	276464	SPAC589.07c	SPBC119.08	atg1801	pmk1	atg18|atg18a	spm1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528502	2543384	2539920	279806	276464	SPAC637.06	SPBC119.08	gmh5	pmk1	SPAC637.06	spm1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528503	3361526	2539920	280602	276464	SPAC664.15	SPBC119.08	caf4	pmk1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	spm1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528504	2543372	2539920	279794	276464	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC119.08	ase1	pmk1	-	spm1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528505	2541536	2539930	278036	276474	SPAC1071.02	SPBC1198.11c	mms19	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528506	3361401	2539930	280477	276474	SPAC1093.03	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC1093.03	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528507	2542861	2539930	279307	276474	SPAC13G7.13c	SPBC1198.11c	msa1	reb1	SPAC6C3.01c	SPBC660.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528508	2542519	2539930	278977	276474	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC1198.11c	scs7	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.9249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528509	2541672	2539930	278168	276474	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC1198.11c	lsk1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.5434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528510	2543106	2539930	279538	276474	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC3A11.13	reb1	SPAC3H5.02	SPBC660.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528511	2541713	2539930	278208	276474	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC1198.11c	atp11	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528512	2543563	2539930	279979	276474	SPAC664.02c	SPBC1198.11c	arp8	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528513	2543226	2539930	279654	276474	SPAC6B12.05c	SPBC1198.11c	ies2	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528514	2542228	2539930	278701	276474	SPAC823.03	SPBC1198.11c	ppk15	reb1	SPAC1E11.03	SPBC660.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528515	2539971	2539930	276515	276474	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC1198.11c	cbp1	reb1	abp1	SPBC660.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528516	2543263	2540031	279691	276574	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC1198.14c	med6	fbp1	pmc5	SPBC660.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528517	2542421	2540031	278884	276574	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC1198.14c	med20	fbp1	-	SPBC660.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528518	2542519	2540031	278977	276574	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC1198.14c	scs7	fbp1	-	SPBC660.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528519	2541614	2540031	278111	276574	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC1198.14c	elp3	fbp1	kat9	SPBC660.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528520	2543384	2540031	279806	276574	SPAC637.06	SPBC1198.14c	gmh5	fbp1	SPAC637.06	SPBC660.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528521	2543544	2540031	279961	276574	SPAC664.07c	SPBC1198.14c	rad9	fbp1	-	SPBC660.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528522	3361561	2539668	280637	276223	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC11B10.10c	swr1	pht1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	pi001	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.9118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528523	2542135	2539668	278611	276223	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC11B10.10c	ubp8	pht1	-	pi001	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528524	2542833	2539668	279280	276223	SPAC13F5.01c	SPBC11B10.10c	msh1	pht1	SPAC23C11.18c	pi001	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528525	2542278	2539668	278747	276223	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC11B10.10c	yaf9	pht1	-	pi001	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.3269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528526	2541871	2539668	278361	276223	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC11B10.10c	res2	pht1	mcs1|pct1	pi001	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528527	2541979	2539668	278464	276223	SPAC23A1.07	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC23A1.07	pht1	-	pi001	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528528	2542032	2539668	278514	276223	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC11B10.10c	pnk1	pht1	-	pi001	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528529	2541710	2539668	278205	276223	SPAC343.11c	SPBC11B10.10c	msc1	pht1	-	pi001	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.3597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528530	2543667	2539668	280081	276223	SPAC4H3.02c	SPBC11B10.10c	swc3	pht1	-	pi001	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528531	2543384	2539668	279806	276223	SPAC637.06	SPBC11B10.10c	gmh5	pht1	SPAC637.06	pi001	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.3185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528532	2542498	2539668	278957	276223	SPACUNK4.16c	SPBC11B10.10c	SPACUNK4.16c	pht1	-	pi001	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528533	2543372	2539668	279794	276223	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC11B10.10c	ase1	pht1	-	pi001	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528534	2542519	2540159	278977	276694	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC12C2.08	scs7	dnm1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528535	2541657	2540159	278153	276694	SPAP27G11.15	SPBC12C2.08	slx1	dnm1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528536	2542141	2539651	278617	276206	SPAC17C9.05c	SPBC12D12.06	pmc3	srb11	med27|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528537	3361506	2539651	280582	276206	SPAC17G8.09	SPBC12D12.06	shg1	srb11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528538	2542555	2539651	279012	276206	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC1952.06c	srb11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528539	2542126	2539651	278602	276206	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC12D12.06	not3	srb11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.4495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528540	2541941	2539651	278428	276206	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC12D12.06	tfs1	srb11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528541	2541903	2539651	278393	276206	SPAC22F8.05	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC22F8.05	srb11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528542	2541789	2539651	278281	276206	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC12D12.06	iwr1	srb11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528543	3361403	2539651	280479	276206	SPAC27D7.12c	SPBC12D12.06	but1	srb11	SPAC27D7.12|mug107|prx	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528544	2541614	2539651	278111	276206	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC12D12.06	elp3	srb11	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528545	2541672	2539651	278168	276206	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC12D12.06	lsk1	srb11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528546	2542592	2539651	279047	276206	SPAC328.01c	SPBC12D12.06	msn5	srb11	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.4584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528547	2541710	2539651	278205	276206	SPAC343.11c	SPBC12D12.06	msc1	srb11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528548	2543064	2539651	279497	276206	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC12D12.06	hrp3	srb11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528549	2543643	2539651	280057	276206	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC12D12.06	hos2	srb11	hda1|phd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528550	2539668	2539651	276223	276206	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC12D12.06	pht1	srb11	pi001	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528551	2542418	2539812	278881	276362	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC1347.02	dad2	fkbp39	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528552	2542513	2539812	278971	276362	SPAC1952.05	SPBC1347.02	gcn5	fkbp39	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528553	2542519	2539812	278977	276362	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC1347.02	scs7	fkbp39	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528554	2541786	2539812	278278	276362	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC1347.02	rok1	fkbp39	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.1318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528555	2541614	2539812	278111	276362	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC1347.02	elp3	fkbp39	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.0414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528556	2541672	2539812	278168	276362	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC1347.02	lsk1	fkbp39	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.4371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528557	2543384	2539812	279806	276362	SPAC637.06	SPBC1347.02	gmh5	fkbp39	SPAC637.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528558	2543384	2539891	279806	276437	SPAC637.06	SPBC1347.08c	gmh5	SPBC1347.08c	SPAC637.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528559	2542277	2539726	278746	276278	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC13E7.08c	dbr1	leo1	-	SPBC13E7.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528560	2542513	2539726	278971	276278	SPAC1952.05	SPBC13E7.08c	gcn5	leo1	kat2	SPBC13E7.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528561	2541871	2539726	278361	276278	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC13E7.08c	res2	leo1	mcs1|pct1	SPBC13E7.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528562	2542701	2539726	279154	276278	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC13E7.08c	mga2	leo1	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC13E7.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528563	2541614	2539726	278111	276278	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC13E7.08c	elp3	leo1	kat9	SPBC13E7.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528564	2541672	2539726	278168	276278	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC13E7.08c	lsk1	leo1	-	SPBC13E7.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528565	2543384	2539726	279806	276278	SPAC637.06	SPBC13E7.08c	gmh5	leo1	SPAC637.06	SPBC13E7.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528566	2542198	2539726	278673	276278	SPAC6F12.09	SPBC13E7.08c	rdp1	leo1	rdr1	SPBC13E7.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528567	2542513	2540100	278971	276638	SPAC1952.05	SPBC13E7.09	gcn5	vrp1	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528568	2542469	2540100	278930	276638	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC13E7.09	erg5	vrp1	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528569	2541776	2540100	278270	276638	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC13E7.09	swd1	vrp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528570	2541672	2540100	278168	276638	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC13E7.09	lsk1	vrp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528571	2543190	2540100	279619	276638	SPAC31F12.01	SPBC13E7.09	zds1	vrp1	SPAC637.14|mug88	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528572	2543384	2540100	279806	276638	SPAC637.06	SPBC13E7.09	gmh5	vrp1	SPAC637.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.1342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528573	2542072	2540100	278549	276638	SPAP32A8.03c	SPBC13E7.09	bop1	vrp1	SPAP32A8.03c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528574	2543670	2540100	280084	276638	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC13E7.09	eme1	vrp1	mms4|slx2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.6281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528575	2541643	2539667	278139	276222	SPAC14C4.13	SPBC13G1.08c	rad17	ash2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528576	2542568	2539667	279024	276222	SPAC1952.02	SPBC13G1.08c	tma23	ash2	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528577	2541776	2539667	278270	276222	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC13G1.08c	swd1	ash2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.2292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528578	2542094	2539667	278571	276222	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC13G1.08c	rcd1	ash2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.1626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528579	2543106	2539667	279538	276222	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC3A11.13	ash2	SPAC3H5.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528580	2541575	2539673	278072	276228	SPAC12B10.01c	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC12B10.01c	mug81	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528581	2542541	2539673	278998	276228	SPAC1B3.03c	SPBC13G1.10c	wis2	mug81	cyp5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528582	2542833	2539773	279280	276324	SPAC13F5.01c	SPBC14F5.08	msh1	med7	SPAC23C11.18c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528583	2539971	2539926	276515	276470	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC14F5.13c	cbp1	pho8	abp1	SPBC14F5.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528584	2541536	2539911	278036	276456	SPAC1071.02	SPBC15D4.10c	mms19	amo1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.5682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528585	2542398	2539911	278862	276456	SPAC1805.03c	SPBC15D4.10c	trm13	amo1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528586	2542195	2539911	278670	276456	SPAC1834.07	SPBC15D4.10c	klp3	amo1	krp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528587	2542555	2539911	279012	276456	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC15D4.10c	SPAC1952.06c	amo1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528588	2541941	2539911	278428	276456	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC15D4.10c	tfs1	amo1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.9801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528589	2541885	2539911	278375	276456	SPAC22H10.03c	SPBC15D4.10c	kap114	amo1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.7658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528590	2541979	2539911	278464	276456	SPAC23A1.07	SPBC15D4.10c	SPAC23A1.07	amo1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528591	2541776	2539911	278270	276456	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC15D4.10c	swd1	amo1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528592	2541856	2539911	278347	276456	SPAC23H3.08c	SPBC15D4.10c	bub3	amo1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528593	3361403	2539911	280479	276456	SPAC27D7.12c	SPBC15D4.10c	but1	amo1	SPAC27D7.12|mug107|prx	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528594	2543686	2539911	280100	276456	SPAC3C7.14c	SPBC15D4.10c	obr1	amo1	apt1|uhp1|p25	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528595	2543064	2539911	279497	276456	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC15D4.10c	hrp3	amo1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.64	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528596	2543616	2539911	280030	276456	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC15D4.10c	cwf21	amo1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528597	2543226	2539911	279654	276456	SPAC6B12.05c	SPBC15D4.10c	ies2	amo1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.7985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528598	2543117	2539911	279549	276456	SPAC806.08c	SPBC15D4.10c	mod21	amo1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528599	2539920	2539911	276464	276456	SPBC119.08	SPBC15D4.10c	pmk1	amo1	spm1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528600	2543592	2539960	280007	276504	SPAC4F10.18	SPBC15D4.15	nup37	pho2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528601	2543384	2539665	279806	276220	SPAC637.06	SPBC1604.19c	gmh5	trs8501	SPAC637.06	SPBC1604.19c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528602	2542519	2539857	278977	276404	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC1604.20c	scs7	tea2	-	klp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528603	2541979	2539857	278464	276404	SPAC23A1.07	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC23A1.07	tea2	-	klp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528604	2541781	2540019	278274	276563	SPAC23G3.07c	SPBC1685.01	snf30	pmp1	-	dsp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528605	2543384	2539740	279806	276292	SPAC637.06	SPBC1685.04	gmh5	SPBC1685.04	SPAC637.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528606	2542809	2539700	279257	276253	SPAC15A10.11	SPBC1685.15c	ubr11	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528607	2542239	2539700	278711	276253	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC1685.15c	chp1	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528608	2542198	2539700	278673	276253	SPAC6F12.09	SPBC1685.15c	rdp1	klp6	rdr1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528609	2543372	2539700	279794	276253	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC1685.15c	ase1	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528610	2539911	2539700	276456	276253	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC1685.15c	amo1	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528611	3361401	2540154	280477	276690	SPAC1093.03	SPBC16C6.05	SPAC1093.03	SPBC16C6.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528612	3361381	2540154	280457	276690	SPAC12G12.01c	SPBC16C6.05	SPAC12G12.01c	SPBC16C6.05	SPAC630.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528613	2542519	2540154	278977	276690	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC16C6.05	scs7	SPBC16C6.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.8507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528614	2543529	2540154	279947	276690	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC16C6.05	ryh1	SPBC16C6.05	hos1|sat7	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528615	2543372	2540154	279794	276690	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC16C6.05	ase1	SPBC16C6.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528616	2540100	2540154	276638	276690	SPBC13E7.09	SPBC16C6.05	vrp1	SPBC16C6.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528617	2543263	3361342	279691	280418	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC16D10.07c	med6	sir2	pmc5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528618	2542421	3361342	278884	280418	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC16D10.07c	med20	sir2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.8606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528619	2542519	3361342	278977	280418	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC16D10.07c	scs7	sir2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528620	2543529	3361342	279947	280418	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC16D10.07c	ryh1	sir2	hos1|sat7	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.4191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528621	2543384	3361342	279806	280418	SPAC637.06	SPBC16D10.07c	gmh5	sir2	SPAC637.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528622	2542757	2539956	279207	276500	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC16E9.11c	mre11	pub3	rad32	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528623	2542513	2539956	278971	276500	SPAC1952.05	SPBC16E9.11c	gcn5	pub3	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528624	2541614	2539956	278111	276500	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC16E9.11c	elp3	pub3	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528625	2543275	2539733	279703	276285	SPAC1002.05c	SPBC16E9.12c	jmj2	pab2	kdm5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528626	2542237	2539733	278709	276285	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC16E9.12c	fin1	pab2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528627	2543064	2539733	279497	276285	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC16E9.12c	hrp3	pab2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528628	2543384	2539733	279806	276285	SPAC637.06	SPBC16E9.12c	gmh5	pab2	SPAC637.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528629	2542592	2540118	279047	276655	SPAC328.01c	SPBC16E9.17c	msn5	rem1	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528630	2542592	2540067	279047	276605	SPAC328.01c	SPBC16H5.05c	msn5	cyp7	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	cwf27	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528631	2541713	2540067	278208	276605	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC16H5.05c	atp11	cyp7	-	cwf27	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528632	2542145	2539925	278621	276469	SPAC17C9.09c	SPBC16H5.13	tim13	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528633	2541468	2539925	277970	276469	SPAC1F5.09c	SPBC16H5.13	shk2	SPBC16H5.13	pak2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528634	2542662	2539925	279115	276469	SPAC25B8.07c	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC25B8.07c	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528635	2541657	2539925	278153	276469	SPAP27G11.15	SPBC16H5.13	slx1	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528636	2539676	2539925	276231	276469	SPBC1347.12	SPBC16H5.13	arp1	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528637	2539740	2539925	276292	276469	SPBC1685.04	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC1685.04	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528638	3361342	2539925	280418	276469	SPBC16D10.07c	SPBC16H5.13	sir2	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528639	3361401	2539949	280477	276493	SPAC1093.03	SPBC1703.04	SPAC1093.03	mlh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528640	2542519	2539949	278977	276493	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC1703.04	scs7	mlh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528641	2543384	2539949	279806	276493	SPAC637.06	SPBC1703.04	gmh5	mlh1	SPAC637.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528642	2543387	2539959	279809	276503	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC1703.11	mcl1	SPBC1703.11	slr3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528643	2542757	2540032	279207	276575	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC1703.14c	mre11	top1	rad32	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.7726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528644	2542519	2540032	278977	276575	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC1703.14c	scs7	top1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.0465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528645	2543384	2540032	279806	276575	SPAC637.06	SPBC1703.14c	gmh5	top1	SPAC637.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528646	2542032	2540198	278514	276731	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC1709.04c	pnk1	cyp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528647	2542568	2539953	279024	276497	SPAC1952.02	SPBC1709.11c	tma23	png2	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528648	2542192	2539953	278667	276497	SPAC9G1.12	SPBC1709.11c	cpd1	png2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528649	2543387	2540064	279809	276602	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC1718.02	mcl1	hop1	slr3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528650	2542462	2539876	278923	276422	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC1734.07c	SPAC19B12.11c	trs8502	-	SPBC1734.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528651	2541672	2539876	278168	276422	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC1734.07c	lsk1	trs8502	-	SPBC1734.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528652	2539930	2539876	276474	276422	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC1734.07c	reb1	trs8502	SPBC660.01c	SPBC1734.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528653	2542192	2539999	278667	276543	SPAC9G1.12	SPBC1734.15	cpd1	rsc4	-	brd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528654	2543384	2539615	279806	276173	SPAC637.06	SPBC1773.02c	gmh5	bcp1	SPAC637.06	SPBC1773.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528655	2539911	2539615	276456	276173	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC1773.02c	amo1	bcp1	-	SPBC1773.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528656	2541468	2539922	277970	276466	SPAC1F5.09c	SPBC1773.11c	shk2	mug89	pak2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528657	2543275	2540044	279703	276582	SPAC1002.05c	SPBC1778.04	jmj2	spo6	kdm5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528658	2542168	2540134	278643	276671	SPAC17A5.16	SPBC17A3.03c	ftp105	SPBC17A3.03c	-	pi043	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528659	2541801	2540134	278292	276671	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC17A3.03c	snf5	SPBC17A3.03c	-	pi043	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528660	2542102	2540134	278578	276671	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC17A3.03c	spc34	SPBC17A3.03c	-	pi043	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528661	3361381	2540077	280457	276615	SPAC12G12.01c	SPBC17D11.04c	SPAC12G12.01c	nto1	SPAC630.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528662	3361381	2539714	280457	276267	SPAC12G12.01c	SPBC1861.07	SPAC12G12.01c	SPBC1861.07	SPAC630.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528663	2542833	2539714	279280	276267	SPAC13F5.01c	SPBC1861.07	msh1	SPBC1861.07	SPAC23C11.18c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528664	2542141	2539714	278617	276267	SPAC17C9.05c	SPBC1861.07	pmc3	SPBC1861.07	med27|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528665	2542008	2539714	278491	276267	SPAC2G11.07c	SPBC1861.07	ptc3	SPBC1861.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528666	2542924	2540822	279365	277340	SPAC12B10.04	SPBC18E5.05c	pby1	elp5	SPAC12B10.04	iki1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528667	2542135	2540822	278611	277340	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC18E5.05c	ubp8	elp5	-	iki1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.9831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528668	2541733	2540822	278227	277340	SPAC27F1.03c	SPBC18E5.05c	uch1	elp5	-	iki1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528669	2539812	2540822	276362	277340	SPBC1347.02	SPBC18E5.05c	fkbp39	elp5	-	iki1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528670	2542318	2540788	278784	277307	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC18H10.06c	cph1	swd2	-	swd2.1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528671	3361506	2540788	280582	277307	SPAC17G8.09	SPBC18H10.06c	shg1	swd2	-	swd2.1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528672	2541867	2540788	278357	277307	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC18H10.06c	sck2	swd2	-	swd2.1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528673	2541776	2540788	278270	277307	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC18H10.06c	swd1	swd2	-	swd2.1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.9844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528674	2543106	2540788	279538	277307	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC3A11.13	swd2	SPAC3H5.02	swd2.1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528675	2541614	2540799	278111	277318	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC18H10.15	elp3	cdk11	kat9	ppk23	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528676	2543190	2540799	279619	277318	SPAC31F12.01	SPBC18H10.15	zds1	cdk11	SPAC637.14|mug88	ppk23	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528677	2541470	2540799	277972	277318	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC18H10.15	rpb9	cdk11	-	ppk23	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528678	2542809	2540787	279257	277306	SPAC15A10.11	SPBC1921.07c	ubr11	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528679	2542513	2540787	278971	277306	SPAC1952.05	SPBC1921.07c	gcn5	sgf29	kat2	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528680	2542582	2540787	279037	277306	SPAC19G12.02c	SPBC1921.07c	pms1	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528681	2542519	2540787	278977	277306	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC1921.07c	scs7	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.8986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528682	2541941	2540787	278428	277306	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC1921.07c	tfs1	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528683	2541899	2540787	278389	277306	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC1921.07c	set3	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528684	2541578	2540787	278075	277306	SPAC25B8.05	SPBC1921.07c	deg1	sgf29	SPAC25B8.05	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528685	2541614	2540787	278111	277306	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC1921.07c	elp3	sgf29	kat9	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528686	2543164	2540787	279595	277306	SPAC3G6.06c	SPBC1921.07c	rad2	sgf29	fen1	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528687	2543529	2540787	279947	277306	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC1921.07c	ryh1	sgf29	hos1|sat7	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.8749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528688	2542192	2540787	278667	277306	SPAC9G1.12	SPBC1921.07c	cpd1	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528689	2539668	2540787	276223	277306	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC1921.07c	pht1	sgf29	pi001	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528690	2539667	2540787	276222	277306	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC1921.07c	ash2	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528691	2539911	2540787	276456	277306	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC1921.07c	amo1	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528692	2542833	2540654	279280	277179	SPAC13F5.01c	SPBC19F5.01c	msh1	puc1	SPAC23C11.18c	SPBP8B7.32c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528693	2542568	2540765	279024	277285	SPAC1952.02	SPBC1D7.01	tma23	pfd1	SPAC1952.02	SPBC1D7.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528694	2542519	2540765	278977	277285	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC1D7.01	scs7	pfd1	-	SPBC1D7.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528695	2543384	2540765	279806	277285	SPAC637.06	SPBC1D7.01	gmh5	pfd1	SPAC637.06	SPBC1D7.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528696	2542311	2540612	278777	277138	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC1D7.05	dad1	byr2	-	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528697	2540008	2540612	276552	277138	SPBC12D12.02c	SPBC1D7.05	cdm1	byr2	-	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528698	2543384	2540589	279806	277115	SPAC637.06	SPBC20F10.06	gmh5	mad2	SPAC637.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528699	2542126	2540664	278602	277189	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC215.02	not3	bob1	-	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528700	2541867	2540664	278357	277189	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC215.02	sck2	bob1	-	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528701	2541776	2540664	278270	277189	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC215.02	swd1	bob1	-	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528702	2543106	2540664	279538	277189	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC215.02	SPAC3A11.13	bob1	SPAC3H5.02	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528703	2543529	2540664	279947	277189	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC215.02	ryh1	bob1	hos1|sat7	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528704	2543414	2540664	279836	277189	SPAC630.10	SPBC215.02	SPAC630.10	bob1	-	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528705	2543275	2540352	279703	276881	SPAC1002.05c	SPBC215.03c	jmj2	csn1	kdm5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528706	3361433	2540352	280509	276881	SPAC1071.12c	SPBC215.03c	stp1	csn1	SPAC926.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528707	3361561	2540352	280637	276881	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC215.03c	swr1	csn1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528708	2541789	2540352	278281	276881	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC215.03c	iwr1	csn1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528709	2541713	2540352	278208	276881	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC215.03c	atp11	csn1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528710	3361526	2540352	280602	276881	SPAC664.15	SPBC215.03c	caf4	csn1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528711	2539960	2540352	276504	276881	SPBC15D4.15	SPBC215.03c	pho2	csn1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528712	2541657	2540686	278153	277211	SPAP27G11.15	SPBC21D10.10	slx1	bdc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528713	2539971	2540686	276515	277211	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC21D10.10	cbp1	bdc1	abp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528714	2542925	2540317	279366	276847	SPAC11E3.04c	SPBC24C6.05	ubc13	sec28	spu13|sst5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.5052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528715	3361478	2540317	280554	276847	SPAC13A11.06	SPBC24C6.05	SPAC13A11.06	sec28	SPAC3H8.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528716	2542767	2540317	279217	276847	SPAC1565.07c	SPBC24C6.05	knd1	sec28	SPAC1565.07c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528717	2542788	2540317	279237	276847	SPAC15A10.15	SPBC24C6.05	sgo2	sec28	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528718	2542318	2540317	278784	276847	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC24C6.05	cph1	sec28	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528719	2542409	2540317	278873	276847	SPAC17G8.10c	SPBC24C6.05	dma1	sec28	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528720	2542239	2540317	278711	276847	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC24C6.05	chp1	sec28	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.0315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528721	2542086	2540317	278563	276847	SPAC25H1.02	SPBC24C6.05	jmj1	sec28	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528722	2542094	2540317	278571	276847	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC24C6.05	rcd1	sec28	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528723	2542059	2540317	278537	276847	SPAC328.06	SPBC24C6.05	ubp2	sec28	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528724	2543064	2540317	279497	276847	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC24C6.05	hrp3	sec28	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528725	2543378	2540317	279800	276847	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC24C6.05	pac10	sec28	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528726	2543423	2540317	279844	276847	SPAC4H3.07c	SPBC24C6.05	SPAC4H3.07c	sec28	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528727	2541633	2540317	278129	276847	SPAC664.01c	SPBC24C6.05	swi6	sec28	SPAC824.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528728	2543226	2540317	279654	276847	SPAC6B12.05c	SPBC24C6.05	ies2	sec28	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528729	2541819	2540317	278310	276847	SPAC6G9.08	SPBC24C6.05	ubp6	sec28	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528730	2542102	2540317	278578	276847	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC24C6.05	spc34	sec28	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528731	2539604	2540317	276162	276847	SPBC1105.14	SPBC24C6.05	rsv2	sec28	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528732	2539812	2540317	276362	276847	SPBC1347.02	SPBC24C6.05	fkbp39	sec28	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528733	2540100	2540317	276638	276847	SPBC13E7.09	SPBC24C6.05	vrp1	sec28	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528734	2542032	2540680	278514	277205	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC26H8.05c	pnk1	pph3	-	SPBC26H8.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.41	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528735	3361401	2540498	280477	277026	SPAC1093.03	SPBC27.02c	SPAC1093.03	ask1	-	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528736	2541575	2540498	278072	277026	SPAC12B10.01c	SPBC27.02c	SPAC12B10.01c	ask1	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528737	2542252	2540498	278722	277026	SPAC17A2.13c	SPBC27.02c	rad25	ask1	-	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528738	2542168	2540498	278643	277026	SPAC17A5.16	SPBC27.02c	ftp105	ask1	-	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528739	2542141	2540498	278617	277026	SPAC17C9.05c	SPBC27.02c	pmc3	ask1	med27|prk1	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528740	2542418	2540498	278881	277026	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC27.02c	dad2	ask1	hos2	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.0937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528741	2542513	2540498	278971	277026	SPAC1952.05	SPBC27.02c	gcn5	ask1	kat2	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528742	2542541	2540498	278998	277026	SPAC1B3.03c	SPBC27.02c	wis2	ask1	cyp5	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528743	2541979	2540498	278464	277026	SPAC23A1.07	SPBC27.02c	SPAC23A1.07	ask1	-	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528744	2541789	2540498	278281	277026	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC27.02c	iwr1	ask1	-	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528745	2541578	2540498	278075	277026	SPAC25B8.05	SPBC27.02c	deg1	ask1	SPAC25B8.05	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528746	2543101	2540498	279533	277026	SPAC323.03c	SPBC27.02c	SPAC323.03c	ask1	-	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528747	2542102	2540498	278578	277026	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC27.02c	spc34	ask1	-	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.8543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528748	2541657	2540498	278153	277026	SPAP27G11.15	SPBC27.02c	slx1	ask1	-	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528749	2543372	2540498	279794	277026	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC27.02c	ase1	ask1	-	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528750	2539812	2540498	276362	277026	SPBC1347.02	SPBC27.02c	fkbp39	ask1	-	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528751	3361342	2540498	280418	277026	SPBC16D10.07c	SPBC27.02c	sir2	ask1	-	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528752	2541536	2540436	278036	276964	SPAC1071.02	SPBC28F2.10c	mms19	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528753	3361401	2540436	280477	276964	SPAC1093.03	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC1093.03	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528754	2541580	2540436	278077	276964	SPAC1687.05	SPBC28F2.10c	pli1	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528755	2542363	2540436	278827	276964	SPAC1783.05	SPBC28F2.10c	hrp1	ngg1	chd1	ada3|kap1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528756	2542141	2540436	278617	276964	SPAC17C9.05c	SPBC28F2.10c	pmc3	ngg1	med27|prk1	ada3|kap1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528757	2542145	2540436	278621	276964	SPAC17C9.09c	SPBC28F2.10c	tim13	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528758	2542513	2540436	278971	276964	SPAC1952.05	SPBC28F2.10c	gcn5	ngg1	kat2	ada3|kap1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.5708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528759	2542519	2540436	278977	276964	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC28F2.10c	scs7	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528760	2541941	2540436	278428	276964	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC28F2.10c	tfs1	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528761	2541899	2540436	278389	276964	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC28F2.10c	set3	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528762	2542032	2540436	278514	276964	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC28F2.10c	pnk1	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.37	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528763	2543106	2540436	279538	276964	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC3A11.13	ngg1	SPAC3H5.02	ada3|kap1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528764	2543667	2540436	280081	276964	SPAC4H3.02c	SPBC28F2.10c	swc3	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528765	2542180	2540436	278655	276964	SPAC589.07c	SPBC28F2.10c	atg1801	ngg1	atg18|atg18a	ada3|kap1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528766	2543563	2540436	279979	276964	SPAC664.02c	SPBC28F2.10c	arp8	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528767	2542845	2540436	279291	276964	SPAC824.04	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC824.04	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528768	2542192	2540436	278667	276964	SPAC9G1.12	SPBC28F2.10c	cpd1	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528769	2540100	2540436	276638	276964	SPBC13E7.09	SPBC28F2.10c	vrp1	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528770	2541801	2540337	278292	276866	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC28F2.11	snf5	hmo1	-	SPBC28F2.11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528771	2542519	2540348	278977	276877	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC29A10.05	scs7	exo1	-	mut2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528772	2541438	2540348	277943	276877	SPAC23G3.10c	SPBC29A10.05	ssr3	exo1	-	mut2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528773	2543516	2540523	279934	277051	SPAC4F10.11	SPBC29A10.10c	spn1	dbl8	-	SPBC29A10.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528774	3361561	2540512	280637	277040	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC29A3.05	swr1	vps71	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.4701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528775	2541575	2540512	278072	277040	SPAC12B10.01c	SPBC29A3.05	SPAC12B10.01c	vps71	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528776	2542135	2540512	278611	277040	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC29A3.05	ubp8	vps71	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528777	2542141	2540512	278617	277040	SPAC17C9.05c	SPBC29A3.05	pmc3	vps71	med27|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528778	2542278	2540512	278747	277040	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC29A3.05	yaf9	vps71	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.1874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528779	2542398	2540512	278862	277040	SPAC1805.03c	SPBC29A3.05	trm13	vps71	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528780	2542519	2540512	278977	277040	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC29A3.05	scs7	vps71	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528781	2541979	2540512	278464	277040	SPAC23A1.07	SPBC29A3.05	SPAC23A1.07	vps71	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528782	2541438	2540512	277943	277040	SPAC23G3.10c	SPBC29A3.05	ssr3	vps71	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528783	2541710	2540512	278205	277040	SPAC343.11c	SPBC29A3.05	msc1	vps71	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.5675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528784	2541713	2540512	278208	277040	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC29A3.05	atp11	vps71	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528785	2543201	2540512	279630	277040	SPAC3F10.15c	SPBC29A3.05	spo12	vps71	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528786	2543576	2540512	279991	277040	SPAC4A8.05c	SPBC29A3.05	myp2	vps71	myo3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528787	2543384	2540512	279806	277040	SPAC637.06	SPBC29A3.05	gmh5	vps71	SPAC637.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528788	2543661	2540512	280075	277040	SPAC644.08	SPBC29A3.05	SPAC644.08	vps71	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528789	2543317	2540512	279741	277040	SPAC823.14	SPBC29A3.05	ptf1	vps71	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528790	2543341	2540512	279764	277040	SPAC8E11.07c	SPBC29A3.05	alp31	vps71	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528791	2542498	2540512	278957	277040	SPACUNK4.16c	SPBC29A3.05	SPACUNK4.16c	vps71	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528792	2543419	2540512	279841	277040	SPAPB24D3.02c	SPBC29A3.05	SPAPB24D3.02c	vps71	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528793	2539668	2540512	276223	277040	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC29A3.05	pht1	vps71	pi001	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.4406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528794	2542469	2540513	278930	277041	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC29A3.08	erg5	pof4	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.5556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528795	2541656	2540513	278152	277041	SPAC25H1.06	SPBC29A3.08	pcf3	pof4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528796	2543164	2540513	279595	277041	SPAC3G6.06c	SPBC29A3.08	rad2	pof4	fen1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528797	2542878	2540513	279323	277041	SPAC57A10.09c	SPBC29A3.08	nhp6	pof4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528798	2543346	2540513	279768	277041	SPAC688.14	SPBC29A3.08	set13	pof4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528799	2542938	2540513	279379	277041	SPAC6B12.08	SPBC29A3.08	mug185	pof4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528800	2541614	2540597	278111	277123	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC29A3.09c	elp3	SPBC29A3.09c	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528801	2542861	2540354	279307	276883	SPAC13G7.13c	SPBC29A3.13	msa1	pdp1	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528802	2542239	2540354	278711	276883	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC29A3.13	chp1	pdp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528803	2542592	2540354	279047	276883	SPAC328.01c	SPBC29A3.13	msn5	pdp1	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528804	2542055	2540354	278534	276883	SPAC6G9.03c	SPBC29A3.13	mug183	pdp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528805	2542021	2540354	278504	276883	SPAP14E8.02	SPBC29A3.13	tos4	pdp1	SPAP14E8.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528806	2539740	2540354	276292	276883	SPBC1685.04	SPBC29A3.13	SPBC1685.04	pdp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528807	2539999	2540354	276543	276883	SPBC1734.15	SPBC29A3.13	rsc4	pdp1	brd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528808	2540354	2540276	276883	276807	SPBC29A3.13	SPBC2A9.03	pdp1	SPBC2A9.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528809	2542519	2540480	278977	277008	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC2A9.04c	scs7	san1	-	SPBC2A9.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528810	2542135	2540492	278611	277020	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC2D10.13	ubp8	est1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528811	2541672	2540492	278168	277020	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC2D10.13	lsk1	est1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528812	2540154	2540492	276690	277020	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC2D10.13	SPBC16C6.05	est1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528813	2541672	2540346	278168	276875	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC2F12.03c	lsk1	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528814	2543667	2540346	280081	276875	SPAC4H3.02c	SPBC2F12.03c	swc3	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528815	2543384	2540346	279806	276875	SPAC637.06	SPBC2F12.03c	gmh5	ebs1	SPAC637.06	SPBC2F12.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528816	2540317	2540346	276847	276875	SPBC24C6.05	SPBC2F12.03c	sec28	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528817	3361433	2540353	280509	276882	SPAC1071.12c	SPBC2F12.12c	stp1	cay1	SPAC926.01c	SPBC2F12.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528818	3361456	2540353	280532	276882	SPAC1142.03c	SPBC2F12.12c	swi2	cay1	SPAC17G6.20c	SPBC2F12.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528819	2542767	2540353	279217	276882	SPAC1565.07c	SPBC2F12.12c	knd1	cay1	SPAC1565.07c	SPBC2F12.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.5744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528820	2542568	2540353	279024	276882	SPAC1952.02	SPBC2F12.12c	tma23	cay1	SPAC1952.02	SPBC2F12.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.7762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528821	2542066	2540353	278543	276882	SPAC227.05	SPBC2F12.12c	SPAC227.05	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528822	2541786	2540353	278278	276882	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC2F12.12c	rok1	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.43	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528823	2541789	2540353	278281	276882	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC2F12.12c	iwr1	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528824	2542094	2540353	278571	276882	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC2F12.12c	rcd1	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528825	2543106	2540353	279538	276882	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC2F12.12c	SPAC3A11.13	cay1	SPAC3H5.02	SPBC2F12.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528826	2543592	2540353	280007	276882	SPAC4F10.18	SPBC2F12.12c	nup37	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528827	2543658	2540353	280072	276882	SPAC644.09	SPBC2F12.12c	SPAC644.09	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528828	2539930	2540353	276474	276882	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC2F12.12c	reb1	cay1	SPBC660.01c	SPBC2F12.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528829	2539726	2540353	276278	276882	SPBC13E7.08c	SPBC2F12.12c	leo1	cay1	SPBC13E7.08c	SPBC2F12.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528830	2539673	2540353	276228	276882	SPBC13G1.10c	SPBC2F12.12c	mug81	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528831	2542701	2540270	279154	276801	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC2G2.02	mga2	syj1	SPAC26H5.05	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528832	2543529	2540270	279947	276801	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC2G2.02	ryh1	syj1	hos1|sat7	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.7317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528833	2542102	2540270	278578	276801	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC2G2.02	spc34	syj1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528834	2539651	2540270	276206	276801	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC2G2.02	srb11	syj1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528835	2543580	2540373	279995	276902	SPAC644.14c	SPBC2G2.05	rad51	rpl1603	rhp51	rpl16c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528836	2542519	2540306	278977	276836	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC2G5.02c	scs7	ckb2	-	SPBC2G5.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.3222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528837	2541672	2540306	278168	276836	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC2G5.02c	lsk1	ckb2	-	SPBC2G5.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.8868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528838	2542568	2540416	279024	276944	SPAC1952.02	SPBC30B4.02c	tma23	SPBC30B4.02c	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528839	2543384	2540416	279806	276944	SPAC637.06	SPBC30B4.02c	gmh5	SPBC30B4.02c	SPAC637.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.5165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528840	2539930	2540416	276474	276944	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC30B4.02c	reb1	SPBC30B4.02c	SPBC660.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528841	2542192	3361323	278667	280399	SPAC9G1.12	SPBC30D10.04	cpd1	swi3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528842	3361401	2540322	280477	276852	SPAC1093.03	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC1093.03	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528843	3361391	2540322	280467	276852	SPAC13G6.01c	SPBC31F10.10c	rad8	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC5H10.14c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528844	2543079	2540322	279512	276852	SPAC343.04c	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC343.04c	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528845	2542180	2540322	278655	276852	SPAC589.07c	SPBC31F10.10c	atg1801	SPBC31F10.10c	atg18|atg18a	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528846	2543111	2540322	279543	276852	SPAC806.07	SPBC31F10.10c	ndk1	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528847	2540031	2540322	276574	276852	SPBC1198.14c	SPBC31F10.10c	fbp1	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC660.04c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528848	2539893	2540322	276439	276852	SPBC1539.10	SPBC31F10.10c	nop16	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528849	2540523	2540322	277051	276852	SPBC29A10.10c	SPBC31F10.10c	dbl8	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC29A10.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528850	3361401	2540396	280477	276924	SPAC1093.03	SPBC31F10.12	SPAC1093.03	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528851	3361381	2540396	280457	276924	SPAC12G12.01c	SPBC31F10.12	SPAC12G12.01c	tma20	SPAC630.02	SPBC31F10.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528852	2543529	2540396	279947	276924	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC31F10.12	ryh1	tma20	hos1|sat7	SPBC31F10.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528853	2540154	2540396	276690	276924	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC31F10.12	SPBC16C6.05	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528854	2541575	2540219	278072	276752	SPAC12B10.01c	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC12B10.01c	hip1	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	hir1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528855	5802929	2540219	858067	276752	SPAC1556.08c	SPBC31F10.13c	cbs2	hip1	SPAC1F12.01c	hir1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528856	2542252	2540219	278722	276752	SPAC17A2.13c	SPBC31F10.13c	rad25	hip1	-	hir1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528857	2542513	2540219	278971	276752	SPAC1952.05	SPBC31F10.13c	gcn5	hip1	kat2	hir1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.41	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528858	2542126	2540219	278602	276752	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC31F10.13c	not3	hip1	-	hir1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.5906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528859	2541781	2540219	278274	276752	SPAC23G3.07c	SPBC31F10.13c	snf30	hip1	-	hir1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528860	2541789	2540219	278281	276752	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC31F10.13c	iwr1	hip1	-	hir1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.5226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528861	2541578	2540219	278075	276752	SPAC25B8.05	SPBC31F10.13c	deg1	hip1	SPAC25B8.05	hir1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528862	2542662	2540219	279115	276752	SPAC25B8.07c	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC25B8.07c	hip1	-	hir1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528863	2542096	2540219	278572	276752	SPAC26H5.02c	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC26H5.02c	hip1	-	hir1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528864	2543165	2540219	279596	276752	SPAC343.07	SPBC31F10.13c	mug28	hip1	-	hir1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528865	2541657	2540219	278153	276752	SPAP27G11.15	SPBC31F10.13c	slx1	hip1	-	hir1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528866	2540159	2540219	276694	276752	SPBC12C2.08	SPBC31F10.13c	dnm1	hip1	-	hir1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528867	2539876	2540219	276422	276752	SPBC1734.07c	SPBC31F10.13c	trs8502	hip1	SPBC1734.07c	hir1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.5291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528868	2540787	2540219	277306	276752	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC31F10.13c	sgf29	hip1	SPBC21D10.13	hir1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.4971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528869	2540436	2540219	276964	276752	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC31F10.13c	ngg1	hip1	ada3|kap1	hir1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528870	2542168	2540221	278643	276754	SPAC17A5.16	SPBC32F12.02	ftp105	rec14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528871	2542032	2540221	278514	276754	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC32F12.02	pnk1	rec14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528872	2542519	2540221	278977	276754	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC32F12.02	scs7	rec14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.97	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528873	2541614	2540221	278111	276754	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC32F12.02	elp3	rec14	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528874	2542126	2540241	278602	276773	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC32H8.11	not3	mei4	-	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528875	2539676	2540241	276231	276773	SPBC1347.12	SPBC32H8.11	arp1	mei4	-	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528876	2540221	2540241	276754	276773	SPBC32F12.02	SPBC32H8.11	rec14	mei4	-	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528877	2542109	2540244	278585	276776	SPAC1687.16c	SPBC336.01	erg31	fbh1	erg3	fdh|fdh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528878	2542295	2540244	278763	276776	SPAC17H9.03c	SPBC336.01	rdl1	fbh1	-	fdh|fdh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528879	2542469	2540244	278930	276776	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC336.01	erg5	fbh1	cyp61	fdh|fdh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528880	2542126	2540244	278602	276776	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC336.01	not3	fbh1	-	fdh|fdh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528881	2542007	2540244	278490	276776	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC336.01	rad57	fbh1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	fdh|fdh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528882	2541899	2540244	278389	276776	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC336.01	set3	fbh1	-	fdh|fdh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528883	2542667	2540244	279120	276776	SPAC26A3.16	SPBC336.01	dph1	fbh1	ucp5	fdh|fdh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528884	2543078	2540244	279511	276776	SPAC31A2.15c	SPBC336.01	dcc1	fbh1	-	fdh|fdh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528885	2543064	2540244	279497	276776	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC336.01	hrp3	fbh1	-	fdh|fdh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528886	2543643	2540244	280057	276776	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC336.01	hos2	fbh1	hda1|phd1	fdh|fdh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528887	2543619	2540244	280033	276776	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC336.01	ypa1	fbh1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	fdh|fdh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528888	2543580	2540244	279995	276776	SPAC644.14c	SPBC336.01	rad51	fbh1	rhp51	fdh|fdh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528889	2543289	2540244	279714	276776	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC336.01	rad26	fbh1	-	fdh|fdh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528890	2539920	2540244	276464	276776	SPBC119.08	SPBC336.01	pmk1	fbh1	spm1	fdh|fdh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528891	2539812	2540244	276362	276776	SPBC1347.02	SPBC336.01	fkbp39	fbh1	-	fdh|fdh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528892	2540154	2540244	276690	276776	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC336.01	SPBC16C6.05	fbh1	-	fdh|fdh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528893	2540346	2540244	276875	276776	SPBC2F12.03c	SPBC336.01	ebs1	fbh1	SPBC2F12.03c	fdh|fdh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528894	2542592	2540251	279047	276783	SPAC328.01c	SPBC336.05c	msn5	SPBC336.05c	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528895	2542102	2540251	278578	276783	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC336.05c	spc34	SPBC336.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528896	2543387	2540251	279809	276783	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC336.05c	mcl1	SPBC336.05c	slr3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528897	2540134	2540251	276671	276783	SPBC17A3.03c	SPBC336.05c	SPBC17A3.03c	SPBC336.05c	pi043	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528898	2543263	2540220	279691	276753	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC337.03	med6	rhn1	pmc5	SPBC337.03|iss4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528899	2542300	2540220	278767	276753	SPAC1687.22c	SPBC337.03	puf3	rhn1	SPAC222.02c	SPBC337.03|iss4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528900	2542421	2540220	278884	276753	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC337.03	med20	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.2015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528901	2541941	2540220	278428	276753	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC337.03	tfs1	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528902	2542667	2540220	279120	276753	SPAC26A3.16	SPBC337.03	dph1	rhn1	ucp5	SPBC337.03|iss4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528903	2543384	2540220	279806	276753	SPAC637.06	SPBC337.03	gmh5	rhn1	SPAC637.06	SPBC337.03|iss4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.6184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528904	2542192	2540220	278667	276753	SPAC9G1.12	SPBC337.03	cpd1	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528905	2540219	2540220	276752	276753	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC337.03	hip1	rhn1	hir1	SPBC337.03|iss4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.5412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528906	2542300	2540995	278767	277511	SPAC1687.22c	SPBC337.16	puf3	cho1	SPAC222.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528907	2542519	2540995	278977	277511	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC337.16	scs7	cho1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528908	2541941	2540995	278428	277511	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC337.16	tfs1	cho1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528909	2541885	2540995	278375	277511	SPAC22H10.03c	SPBC337.16	kap114	cho1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528910	2541776	2540995	278270	277511	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC337.16	swd1	cho1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528911	2541531	2540995	278031	277511	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC337.16	fft3	cho1	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528912	2541710	2540995	278205	277511	SPAC343.11c	SPBC337.16	msc1	cho1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528913	2543064	2540995	279497	277511	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC337.16	hrp3	cho1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528914	2543384	2540995	279806	277511	SPAC637.06	SPBC337.16	gmh5	cho1	SPAC637.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528915	2539726	2540995	276278	277511	SPBC13E7.08c	SPBC337.16	leo1	cho1	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528916	2540788	2540995	277307	277511	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC337.16	swd2	cho1	swd2.1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528917	2540653	2540995	277178	277511	SPBC215.07c	SPBC337.16	SPBC215.07c	cho1	pdp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528918	2540523	2540995	277051	277511	SPBC29A10.10c	SPBC337.16	dbl8	cho1	SPBC29A10.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528919	2540512	2540995	277040	277511	SPBC29A3.05	SPBC337.16	vps71	cho1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.4297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528920	2542519	2540945	278977	277461	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC342.06c	scs7	rtt109	-	kat11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528921	2539925	2540945	276469	277461	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC342.06c	SPBC16H5.13	rtt109	-	kat11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528922	2541903	2540929	278393	277445	SPAC22F8.05	SPBC354.03	SPAC22F8.05	swd3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528923	2541776	2540929	278270	277445	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC354.03	swd1	swd3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.4644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528924	2540100	2540929	276638	277445	SPBC13E7.09	SPBC354.03	vrp1	swd3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528925	2540788	2540929	277307	277445	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC354.03	swd2	swd3	swd2.1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.2031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528926	2542519	2540952	278977	277468	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC354.09c	scs7	SPBC354.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528927	2542421	2540368	278884	276897	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC36.05c	med20	clr6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528928	2541531	2540368	278031	276897	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC36.05c	fft3	clr6	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.6488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528929	2542094	2540368	278571	276897	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC36.05c	rcd1	clr6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528930	2541889	2540368	278379	276897	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC36.05c	pom1	clr6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528931	2540317	2540368	276847	276897	SPBC24C6.05	SPBC36.05c	sec28	clr6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528932	2541536	2541017	278036	277532	SPAC1071.02	SPBC36.07	mms19	elp1	-	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528933	3361433	2541017	280509	277532	SPAC1071.12c	SPBC36.07	stp1	elp1	SPAC926.01c	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528934	2542135	2541017	278611	277532	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC36.07	ubp8	elp1	-	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528935	2542513	2541017	278971	277532	SPAC1952.05	SPBC36.07	gcn5	elp1	kat2	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528936	2542462	2541017	278923	277532	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC36.07	SPAC19B12.11c	elp1	-	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.4148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528937	2541614	2541017	278111	277532	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC36.07	elp3	elp1	kat9	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.5253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528938	2541672	2541017	278168	277532	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC36.07	lsk1	elp1	-	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528939	2542516	2541017	278974	277532	SPAC2F7.04	SPBC36.07	pmc2	elp1	med1	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528940	2543101	2541017	279533	277532	SPAC323.03c	SPBC36.07	SPAC323.03c	elp1	-	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528941	2543667	2541017	280081	277532	SPAC4H3.02c	SPBC36.07	swc3	elp1	-	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528942	2543423	2541017	279844	277532	SPAC4H3.07c	SPBC36.07	SPAC4H3.07c	elp1	-	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528943	2542102	2541017	278578	277532	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC36.07	spc34	elp1	-	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528944	2539812	2541017	276362	277532	SPBC1347.02	SPBC36.07	fkbp39	elp1	-	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528945	2540100	2541017	276638	277532	SPBC13E7.09	SPBC36.07	vrp1	elp1	-	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528946	2542757	2540967	279207	277483	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC36B7.08c	mre11	SPBC36B7.08c	rad32	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528947	2541580	2540967	278077	277483	SPAC1687.05	SPBC36B7.08c	pli1	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528948	2542318	2540967	278784	277483	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC36B7.08c	cph1	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528949	2541496	2540967	277998	277483	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC36B7.08c	arp42	SPBC36B7.08c	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528950	2541801	2540967	278292	277483	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC36B7.08c	snf5	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528951	2543064	2540967	279497	277483	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC36B7.08c	hrp3	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528952	2542925	2540320	279366	276850	SPAC11E3.04c	SPBC3D6.04c	ubc13	mad1	spu13|sst5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528953	3361506	2540320	280582	276850	SPAC17G8.09	SPBC3D6.04c	shg1	mad1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528954	2541498	2540320	278000	276850	SPAC227.10	SPBC3D6.04c	SPAC227.10	mad1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528955	2542086	2540320	278563	276850	SPAC25H1.02	SPBC3D6.04c	jmj1	mad1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528956	2542878	2540320	279323	276850	SPAC57A10.09c	SPBC3D6.04c	nhp6	mad1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528957	2541470	2540320	277972	276850	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC3D6.04c	rpb9	mad1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528958	2540799	2540320	277318	276850	SPBC18H10.15	SPBC3D6.04c	cdk11	mad1	ppk23	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528959	2542519	2540679	278977	277204	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC3D6.10	scs7	apn2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528960	2541801	2540679	278292	277204	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC3D6.10	snf5	apn2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528961	2541801	2540997	278292	277513	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC3H7.06c	snf5	pof9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528962	2543064	2540997	279497	277513	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC3H7.06c	hrp3	pof9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528963	3361401	2540968	280477	277484	SPAC1093.03	SPBC3H7.07c	SPAC1093.03	ser2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528964	2542311	2540968	278777	277484	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC3H7.07c	dad1	ser2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528965	2542418	2540968	278881	277484	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC3H7.07c	dad2	ser2	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.7151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528966	2542513	2540968	278971	277484	SPAC1952.05	SPBC3H7.07c	gcn5	ser2	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528967	2542519	2540968	278977	277484	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC3H7.07c	scs7	ser2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.3137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528968	2542036	2540968	278518	277484	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC3H7.07c	hrq1	ser2	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528969	2541672	2540968	278168	277484	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC3H7.07c	lsk1	ser2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528970	2542008	2540968	278491	277484	SPAC2G11.07c	SPBC3H7.07c	ptc3	ser2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528971	2543452	2540968	279872	277484	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC3H7.07c	ssu72	ser2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528972	2542102	2540968	278578	277484	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC3H7.07c	spc34	ser2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.3761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528973	2541536	2540979	278036	277495	SPAC1071.02	SPBC3H7.10	mms19	elp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528974	3361401	2540979	280477	277495	SPAC1093.03	SPBC3H7.10	SPAC1093.03	elp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528975	2542135	2540979	278611	277495	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC3H7.10	ubp8	elp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.77	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528976	2542418	2540979	278881	277495	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC3H7.10	dad2	elp6	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528977	2542513	2540979	278971	277495	SPAC1952.05	SPBC3H7.10	gcn5	elp6	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528978	2542462	2540979	278923	277495	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC3H7.10	SPAC19B12.11c	elp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528979	2541786	2540979	278278	277495	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC3H7.10	rok1	elp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528980	2541614	2540979	278111	277495	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC3H7.10	elp3	elp6	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.4325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528981	2541672	2540979	278168	277495	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC3H7.10	lsk1	elp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528982	2542516	2540979	278974	277495	SPAC2F7.04	SPBC3H7.10	pmc2	elp6	med1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528983	2543101	2540979	279533	277495	SPAC323.03c	SPBC3H7.10	SPAC323.03c	elp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528984	2543667	2540979	280081	277495	SPAC4H3.02c	SPBC3H7.10	swc3	elp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528985	2543423	2540979	279844	277495	SPAC4H3.07c	SPBC3H7.10	SPAC4H3.07c	elp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528986	2542180	2540979	278655	277495	SPAC589.07c	SPBC3H7.10	atg1801	elp6	atg18|atg18a	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528987	2542102	2540979	278578	277495	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC3H7.10	spc34	elp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528988	2539812	2540979	276362	277495	SPBC1347.02	SPBC3H7.10	fkbp39	elp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.06	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528989	2539673	2540979	276228	277495	SPBC13G1.10c	SPBC3H7.10	mug81	elp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528990	2542418	2540600	278881	277126	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC4.05	dad2	mlo2	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528991	2543384	2540600	279806	277126	SPAC637.06	SPBC4.05	gmh5	mlo2	SPAC637.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528992	2543387	2540600	279809	277126	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC4.05	mcl1	mlo2	slr3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528993	2539911	2540600	276456	277126	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC4.05	amo1	mlo2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528994	2540219	2540600	276752	277126	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC4.05	hip1	mlo2	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528995	2543263	2540825	279691	277343	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC428.08c	med6	clr4	pmc5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528996	2542239	2540825	278711	277343	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC428.08c	chp1	clr4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528997	2541941	2540825	278428	277343	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC428.08c	tfs1	clr4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528998	2541789	2540825	278281	277343	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC428.08c	iwr1	clr4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
528999	2542516	2540825	278974	277343	SPAC2F7.04	SPBC428.08c	pmc2	clr4	med1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.3287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529000	2542198	2540825	278673	277343	SPAC6F12.09	SPBC428.08c	rdp1	clr4	rdr1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.4799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529001	2541470	2540825	277972	277343	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC428.08c	rpb9	clr4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.4226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529002	2540967	2540825	277483	277343	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC428.08c	SPBC36B7.08c	clr4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529003	2541672	2540860	278168	277377	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC428.17c	lsk1	wpl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529004	2540513	2540860	277041	277377	SPBC29A3.08	SPBC428.17c	pof4	wpl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529005	2540354	2540860	276883	277377	SPBC29A3.13	SPBC428.17c	pdp1	wpl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529006	2541575	2540749	278072	277271	SPAC12B10.01c	SPBC4B4.03	SPAC12B10.01c	rsc1	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529007	2542555	2540749	279012	277271	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC4B4.03	SPAC1952.06c	rsc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529008	2542550	2540749	279007	277271	SPAC1B3.02c	SPBC4B4.03	SPAC1B3.02c	rsc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529009	2541979	2540749	278464	277271	SPAC23A1.07	SPBC4B4.03	SPAC23A1.07	rsc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529010	2543101	2540749	279533	277271	SPAC323.03c	SPBC4B4.03	SPAC323.03c	rsc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529011	2543159	2540749	279590	277271	SPAC3C7.09	SPBC4B4.03	set8	rsc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529012	2543563	2540749	279979	277271	SPAC664.02c	SPBC4B4.03	arp8	rsc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529013	2543226	2540749	279654	277271	SPAC6B12.05c	SPBC4B4.03	ies2	rsc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.6992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529014	2543275	2540999	279703	277515	SPAC1002.05c	SPBC4B4.04	jmj2	SPBC4B4.04	kdm5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529015	2542135	2540999	278611	277515	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC4B4.04	ubp8	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529016	2542757	2540999	279207	277515	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC4B4.04	mre11	SPBC4B4.04	rad32	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.9338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529017	2542309	2540999	278775	277515	SPAC16A10.02	SPBC4B4.04	sub1	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529018	2542145	2540999	278621	277515	SPAC17C9.09c	SPBC4B4.04	tim13	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529019	2542239	2540999	278711	277515	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC4B4.04	chp1	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529020	2542469	2540999	278930	277515	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC4B4.04	erg5	SPBC4B4.04	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529021	2542519	2540999	278977	277515	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC4B4.04	scs7	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529022	2541468	2540999	277970	277515	SPAC1F5.09c	SPBC4B4.04	shk2	SPBC4B4.04	pak2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.3544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529023	2542066	2540999	278543	277515	SPAC227.05	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC227.05	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529024	2541856	2540999	278347	277515	SPAC23H3.08c	SPBC4B4.04	bub3	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529025	2542081	2540999	278558	277515	SPAC26H5.04	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC26H5.04	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529026	2542701	2540999	279154	277515	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC4B4.04	mga2	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC26H5.05	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.6803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529027	2541614	2540999	278111	277515	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC4B4.04	elp3	SPBC4B4.04	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529028	2543106	2540999	279538	277515	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC3H5.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.6457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529029	2543378	2540999	279800	277515	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC4B4.04	pac10	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529030	2543529	2540999	279947	277515	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC4B4.04	ryh1	SPBC4B4.04	hos1|sat7	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529031	2541017	2540999	277532	277515	SPBC36.07	SPBC4B4.04	elp1	SPBC4B4.04	iki3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.5778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529032	2540968	2540999	277484	277515	SPBC3H7.07c	SPBC4B4.04	ser2	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.8028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529033	2540979	2540999	277495	277515	SPBC3H7.10	SPBC4B4.04	elp6	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529034	2541801	2540905	278292	277421	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC530.06c	snf5	clu1	-	SPBC530.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529035	2542102	2540905	278578	277421	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC530.06c	spc34	clu1	-	SPBC530.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529036	2539971	2540905	276515	277421	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC530.06c	cbp1	clu1	abp1	SPBC530.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529037	2542519	2539847	278977	276395	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC530.14c	scs7	dsk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529038	2541871	2539847	278361	276395	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC530.14c	res2	dsk1	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529039	2539911	2539847	276456	276395	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC530.14c	amo1	dsk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.7139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529040	2542757	2541045	279207	277560	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC543.03c	mre11	pku80	rad32	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.9967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529041	2542007	2541045	278490	277560	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC543.03c	rad57	pku80	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529042	2540822	2541045	277340	277560	SPBC18E5.05c	SPBC543.03c	elp5	pku80	iki1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.14	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529043	2540354	2541045	276883	277560	SPBC29A3.13	SPBC543.03c	pdp1	pku80	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529044	2540244	2541045	276776	277560	SPBC336.01	SPBC543.03c	fbh1	pku80	fdh|fdh1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529045	2542701	2540919	279154	277435	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC543.07	mga2	pek1	SPAC26H5.05	mkk1|skh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.4342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529046	2543384	2540919	279806	277435	SPAC637.06	SPBC543.07	gmh5	pek1	SPAC637.06	mkk1|skh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.2185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529047	2543372	2540919	279794	277435	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC543.07	ase1	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529048	2540788	2540919	277307	277435	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC543.07	swd2	pek1	swd2.1	mkk1|skh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529049	2540825	2540919	277343	277435	SPBC428.08c	SPBC543.07	clr4	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529050	2541614	2540893	278111	277409	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC543.10	elp3	get1	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529051	2542192	2540893	278667	277409	SPAC9G1.12	SPBC543.10	cpd1	get1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529052	2542764	2541080	279214	277595	SPAC15E1.10	SPBC557.04	SPAC15E1.10	ppk29	SPAP7G5.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529053	2542555	2540913	279012	277429	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529054	2542421	2541098	278884	277613	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC577.13	med20	syj2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529055	2543164	2541101	279595	277616	SPAC3G6.06c	SPBC609.02	rad2	ptn1	fen1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529056	2542513	2541121	278971	277636	SPAC1952.05	SPBC609.03	gcn5	iqw1	kat2	iqwd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529057	2541575	2541088	278072	277603	SPAC12B10.01c	SPBC609.05	SPAC12B10.01c	pob3	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529058	2542568	2541088	279024	277603	SPAC1952.02	SPBC609.05	tma23	pob3	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529059	2543165	2541088	279596	277603	SPAC343.07	SPBC609.05	mug28	pob3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529060	2543064	2541088	279497	277603	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC609.05	hrp3	pob3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529061	2543592	2541088	280007	277603	SPAC4F10.18	SPBC609.05	nup37	pob3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529062	2542180	2541088	278655	277603	SPAC589.07c	SPBC609.05	atg1801	pob3	atg18|atg18a	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.6665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529063	3361526	2541088	280602	277603	SPAC664.15	SPBC609.05	caf4	pob3	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529064	2540154	2541088	276690	277603	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC609.05	SPBC16C6.05	pob3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529065	2540241	2541088	276773	277603	SPBC32H8.11	SPBC609.05	mei4	pob3	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529066	2540995	2541088	277511	277603	SPBC337.16	SPBC609.05	cho1	pob3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529067	2540952	2541088	277468	277603	SPBC354.09c	SPBC609.05	SPBC354.09c	pob3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529068	2541004	2541088	277519	277603	SPBC3F6.01c	SPBC609.05	SPBC3F6.01c	pob3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529069	2542568	2541120	279024	277635	SPAC1952.02	SPBC649.03	tma23	rhp14	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529070	2541801	2541120	278292	277635	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC649.03	snf5	rhp14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529071	2543423	2541120	279844	277635	SPAC4H3.07c	SPBC649.03	SPAC4H3.07c	rhp14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529072	2540317	2541120	276847	277635	SPBC24C6.05	SPBC649.03	sec28	rhp14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529073	3361401	2541147	280477	277662	SPAC1093.03	SPBC651.05c	SPAC1093.03	dot2	-	vps22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529074	2542300	2541147	278767	277662	SPAC1687.22c	SPBC651.05c	puf3	dot2	SPAC222.02c	vps22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529075	2541786	2541147	278278	277662	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC651.05c	rok1	dot2	-	vps22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529076	2542592	2541147	279047	277662	SPAC328.01c	SPBC651.05c	msn5	dot2	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	vps22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529077	2543106	2541147	279538	277662	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC651.05c	SPAC3A11.13	dot2	SPAC3H5.02	vps22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529078	2543064	2541147	279497	277662	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC651.05c	hrp3	dot2	-	vps22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529079	2543384	2541147	279806	277662	SPAC637.06	SPBC651.05c	gmh5	dot2	SPAC637.06	vps22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529080	2539812	2541147	276362	277662	SPBC1347.02	SPBC651.05c	fkbp39	dot2	-	vps22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529081	2540317	2541147	276847	277662	SPBC24C6.05	SPBC651.05c	sec28	dot2	-	vps22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529082	2540244	2541147	276776	277662	SPBC336.01	SPBC651.05c	fbh1	dot2	fdh|fdh1	vps22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529083	2542809	2541158	279257	277673	SPAC15A10.11	SPBC660.13c	ubr11	ssb1	-	rad11|rpa1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529084	2541628	2541109	278124	277624	SPAC110.02	SPBC6B1.02	pds5	ppk30	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529085	2542757	2541109	279207	277624	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC6B1.02	mre11	ppk30	rad32	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529086	2542278	2541109	278747	277624	SPAC17G8.07	SPBC6B1.02	yaf9	ppk30	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529087	2542418	2541109	278881	277624	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC6B1.02	dad2	ppk30	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529088	2542123	2541109	278599	277624	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC6B1.02	mal3	ppk30	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529089	2543384	2541109	279806	277624	SPAC637.06	SPBC6B1.02	gmh5	ppk30	SPAC637.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.4431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529090	2539668	2541109	276223	277624	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC6B1.02	pht1	ppk30	pi001	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529091	2540219	2541109	276752	277624	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC6B1.02	hip1	ppk30	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529092	2540241	2541109	276773	277624	SPBC32H8.11	SPBC6B1.02	mei4	ppk30	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529093	2542094	2541095	278571	277610	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC725.06c	rcd1	ppk31	-	mug25	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529094	2539959	2541095	276503	277610	SPBC1703.11	SPBC725.06c	SPBC1703.11	ppk31	-	mug25	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529095	2540992	2541095	277508	277610	SPBC342.05	SPBC725.06c	crb2	ppk31	rhp9	mug25	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529096	2541628	2541166	278124	277681	SPAC110.02	SPBC725.15	pds5	ura5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529097	2542418	2541166	278881	277681	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC725.15	dad2	ura5	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529098	2543580	2541166	279995	277681	SPAC644.14c	SPBC725.15	rad51	ura5	rhp51	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529099	2540317	2541166	276847	277681	SPBC24C6.05	SPBC725.15	sec28	ura5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529100	2540513	2541166	277041	277681	SPBC29A3.08	SPBC725.15	pof4	ura5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529101	2542032	2540821	278514	277339	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC800.03	pnk1	clr3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529102	2542102	2540821	278578	277339	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC800.03	spc34	clr3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529103	2540498	2540821	277026	277339	SPBC27.02c	SPBC800.03	ask1	clr3	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529104	2540220	2540821	276753	277339	SPBC337.03	SPBC800.03	rhn1	clr3	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529105	2543341	2540936	279764	277452	SPAC8E11.07c	SPBC800.05c	alp31	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529106	2540513	2540936	277041	277452	SPBC29A3.08	SPBC800.05c	pof4	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529107	2543263	2540829	279691	277347	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC800.09	med6	sum2	pmc5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.7084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529108	2542925	2540829	279366	277347	SPAC11E3.04c	SPBC800.09	ubc13	sum2	spu13|sst5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529109	2542459	2540829	278920	277347	SPAC1D4.03c	SPBC800.09	aut12	sum2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529110	2541713	2540829	278208	277347	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC800.09	atp11	sum2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529111	2540100	2540829	276638	277347	SPBC13E7.09	SPBC800.09	vrp1	sum2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529112	2540352	2540829	276881	277347	SPBC215.03c	SPBC800.09	csn1	sum2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529113	2541147	2540829	277662	277347	SPBC651.05c	SPBC800.09	dot2	sum2	vps22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529114	2543263	2540735	279691	277258	SPAC1002.15c	SPBC83.03c	med6	tas3	pmc5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529115	2542239	2540735	278711	277258	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC83.03c	chp1	tas3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529116	2541479	2540735	277981	277258	SPAC27F1.06c	SPBC83.03c	SPAC27F1.06c	tas3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529117	2542516	2540735	278974	277258	SPAC2F7.04	SPBC83.03c	pmc2	tas3	med1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529118	2543592	2540735	280007	277258	SPAC4F10.18	SPBC83.03c	nup37	tas3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529119	2543577	2540735	279992	277258	SPAC4H3.05	SPBC83.03c	srs2	tas3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529120	2541633	2540735	278129	277258	SPAC664.01c	SPBC83.03c	swi6	tas3	SPAC824.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529121	2542198	2540735	278673	277258	SPAC6F12.09	SPBC83.03c	rdp1	tas3	rdr1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.1534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529122	2541470	2540735	277972	277258	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC83.03c	rpb9	tas3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.7572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529123	2539700	2540735	276253	277258	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC83.03c	klp6	tas3	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529124	2540032	2540735	276575	277258	SPBC1703.14c	SPBC83.03c	top1	tas3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529125	2540317	2540735	276847	277258	SPBC24C6.05	SPBC83.03c	sec28	tas3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.8357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529126	2540967	2540735	277483	277258	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC83.03c	SPBC36B7.08c	tas3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529127	2540825	2540735	277343	277258	SPBC428.08c	SPBC83.03c	clr4	tas3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.1873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529128	2543384	2540741	279806	277264	SPAC637.06	SPBC83.05	gmh5	SPBC83.05	SPAC637.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529129	2542032	2541135	278514	277650	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC839.03c	pnk1	SPBC839.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529130	2543106	2541135	279538	277650	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC839.03c	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC839.03c	SPAC3H5.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529131	2543164	2541135	279595	277650	SPAC3G6.06c	SPBC839.03c	rad2	SPBC839.03c	fen1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529132	2543452	2541135	279872	277650	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC839.03c	ssu72	SPBC839.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529133	2543378	2541135	279800	277650	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC839.03c	pac10	SPBC839.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529134	2543577	2541135	279992	277650	SPAC4H3.05	SPBC839.03c	srs2	SPBC839.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529135	2539971	2541135	276515	277650	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC839.03c	cbp1	SPBC839.03c	abp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529136	2539857	2541135	276404	277650	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC839.03c	tea2	SPBC839.03c	klp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529137	2540352	2541135	276881	277650	SPBC215.03c	SPBC839.03c	csn1	SPBC839.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529138	2542421	2541175	278884	277689	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC839.13c	med20	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529139	2542513	2541175	278971	277689	SPAC1952.05	SPBC839.13c	gcn5	rpl1601	kat2	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529140	2542066	2541175	278543	277689	SPAC227.05	SPBC839.13c	SPAC227.05	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529141	2541786	2541175	278278	277689	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC839.13c	rok1	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.4049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529142	2541496	2541175	277998	277689	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC839.13c	arp42	rpl1601	arp4	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529143	2541789	2541175	278281	277689	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC839.13c	iwr1	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529144	2541672	2541175	278168	277689	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC839.13c	lsk1	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.4668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529145	2543064	2541175	279497	277689	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC839.13c	hrp3	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529146	2543378	2541175	279800	277689	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC839.13c	pac10	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529147	2541657	2541175	278153	277689	SPAP27G11.15	SPBC839.13c	slx1	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529148	2539667	2541175	276222	277689	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC839.13c	ash2	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529149	2539911	2541175	276456	277689	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBC839.13c	amo1	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.8756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529150	2540788	2541175	277307	277689	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC839.13c	swd2	rpl1601	swd2.1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529151	2540664	2541175	277189	277689	SPBC215.02	SPBC839.13c	bob1	rpl1601	gim5	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529152	2540436	2541175	276964	277689	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC839.13c	ngg1	rpl1601	ada3|kap1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.5088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529153	2540979	2541175	277495	277689	SPBC3H7.10	SPBC839.13c	elp6	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529154	2541642	2541208	278138	277722	SPAC10F6.05c	SPBC887.04c	ubc6	lub1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529155	2542135	2541208	278611	277722	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC887.04c	ubp8	lub1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529156	2542770	2541208	279220	277722	SPAC167.07c	SPBC887.04c	hul5	lub1	SPAC167.07c|SPAC57A7.03c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.5538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529157	2542513	2541208	278971	277722	SPAC1952.05	SPBC887.04c	gcn5	lub1	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529158	2542469	2541208	278930	277722	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC887.04c	erg5	lub1	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529159	2542023	2541208	278506	277722	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC887.04c	ufd2	lub1	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529160	2542066	2541208	278543	277722	SPAC227.05	SPBC887.04c	SPAC227.05	lub1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529161	2541885	2541208	278375	277722	SPAC22H10.03c	SPBC887.04c	kap114	lub1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529162	2541496	2541208	277998	277722	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC887.04c	arp42	lub1	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529163	2541789	2541208	278281	277722	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC887.04c	iwr1	lub1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529164	2541531	2541208	278031	277722	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC887.04c	fft3	lub1	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529165	2541672	2541208	278168	277722	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC887.04c	lsk1	lub1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.1146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529166	2542516	2541208	278974	277722	SPAC2F7.04	SPBC887.04c	pmc2	lub1	med1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529167	2540317	2541208	276847	277722	SPBC24C6.05	SPBC887.04c	sec28	lub1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529168	2540436	2541208	276964	277722	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC887.04c	ngg1	lub1	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529169	2540512	2541208	277040	277722	SPBC29A3.05	SPBC887.04c	vps71	lub1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529170	2542421	2541220	278884	277734	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC8D2.04	med20	hht2	-	h3.2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529171	2542701	2541220	279154	277734	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC8D2.04	mga2	hht2	SPAC26H5.05	h3.2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529172	2543190	2541220	279619	277734	SPAC31F12.01	SPBC8D2.04	zds1	hht2	SPAC637.14|mug88	h3.2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529173	2543064	2541220	279497	277734	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC8D2.04	hrp3	hht2	-	h3.2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529174	2539971	2541220	276515	277734	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC8D2.04	cbp1	hht2	abp1	h3.2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529175	2540787	2541220	277306	277734	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC8D2.04	sgf29	hht2	SPBC21D10.13	h3.2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529176	2540317	2541220	276847	277734	SPBC24C6.05	SPBC8D2.04	sec28	hht2	-	h3.2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529177	2541899	2541259	278389	277773	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC8D2.16c	set3	SPBC8D2.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529178	2543384	2541259	279806	277773	SPAC637.06	SPBC8D2.16c	gmh5	SPBC8D2.16c	SPAC637.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529179	2542102	2541259	278578	277773	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC8D2.16c	spc34	SPBC8D2.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529180	2542925	2541284	279366	277797	SPAC11E3.04c	SPBC947.08c	ubc13	hip4	spu13|sst5	hpc2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529181	2542421	2541284	278884	277797	SPAC17G8.05	SPBC947.08c	med20	hip4	-	hpc2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529182	2542513	2541284	278971	277797	SPAC1952.05	SPBC947.08c	gcn5	hip4	kat2	hpc2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.8574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529183	2542126	2541284	278602	277797	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC947.08c	not3	hip4	-	hpc2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529184	2541781	2541284	278274	277797	SPAC23G3.07c	SPBC947.08c	snf30	hip4	-	hpc2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529185	2541789	2541284	278281	277797	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC947.08c	iwr1	hip4	-	hpc2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529186	2542516	2541284	278974	277797	SPAC2F7.04	SPBC947.08c	pmc2	hip4	med1	hpc2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529187	2539971	2541284	276515	277797	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC947.08c	cbp1	hip4	abp1	hpc2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.8833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529188	2539604	2541284	276162	277797	SPBC1105.14	SPBC947.08c	rsv2	hip4	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	hpc2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.7936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529189	2539956	2541284	276500	277797	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBC947.08c	pub3	hip4	-	hpc2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529190	2540787	2541284	277306	277797	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC947.08c	sgf29	hip4	SPBC21D10.13	hpc2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.6474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529191	2540436	2541284	276964	277797	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC947.08c	ngg1	hip4	ada3|kap1	hpc2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.7761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529192	2540219	2541284	276752	277797	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC947.08c	hip1	hip4	hir1	hpc2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.8629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529193	2540600	2541284	277126	277797	SPBC4.05	SPBC947.08c	mlo2	hip4	-	hpc2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529194	2541109	2541284	277624	277797	SPBC6B1.02	SPBC947.08c	ppk30	hip4	-	hpc2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529195	2543580	2541251	279995	277765	SPAC644.14c	SPBC947.10	rad51	dsc1	rhp51	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529196	2541672	2541292	278168	277804	SPAC2F3.15	SPBP23A10.16	lsk1	sdh4	-	tim18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529197	2542592	2541292	279047	277804	SPAC328.01c	SPBP23A10.16	msn5	sdh4	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	tim18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529198	2543064	2541292	279497	277804	SPAC3G6.01	SPBP23A10.16	hrp3	sdh4	-	tim18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529199	2543319	2541292	279743	277804	SPAC6B12.09	SPBP23A10.16	trm10	sdh4	-	tim18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529200	2543372	2541292	279794	277804	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBP23A10.16	ase1	sdh4	-	tim18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529201	2540219	2541292	276752	277804	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBP23A10.16	hip1	sdh4	hir1	tim18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529202	2540244	2541292	276776	277804	SPBC336.01	SPBP23A10.16	fbh1	sdh4	fdh|fdh1	tim18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529203	2540825	2541292	277343	277804	SPBC428.08c	SPBP23A10.16	clr4	sdh4	-	tim18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529204	2540936	2541292	277452	277804	SPBC800.05c	SPBP23A10.16	atb2	sdh4	alp2|ban5|tub1	tim18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529205	2543263	2541330	279691	277842	SPAC1002.15c	SPBP35G2.06c	med6	nup131	pmc5	Nup133a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.2789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529206	2542421	2541330	278884	277842	SPAC17G8.05	SPBP35G2.06c	med20	nup131	-	Nup133a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529207	2542519	2541330	278977	277842	SPAC19G12.08	SPBP35G2.06c	scs7	nup131	-	Nup133a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.4426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529208	2540317	2541330	276847	277842	SPBC24C6.05	SPBP35G2.06c	sec28	nup131	-	Nup133a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.3774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529209	2540498	2541330	277026	277842	SPBC27.02c	SPBP35G2.06c	ask1	nup131	mug181	Nup133a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529210	2540219	2541330	276752	277842	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBP35G2.06c	hip1	nup131	hir1	Nup133a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529211	2542195	2541349	278670	277860	SPAC1834.07	SPBP35G2.08c	klp3	air1	krp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529212	2542555	2541349	279012	277860	SPAC1952.06c	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC1952.06c	air1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529213	2542459	2541349	278920	277860	SPAC1D4.03c	SPBP35G2.08c	aut12	air1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529214	2541845	2541349	278336	277860	SPAC23G3.08c	SPBP35G2.08c	ubp7	air1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529215	2542592	2541349	279047	277860	SPAC328.01c	SPBP35G2.08c	msn5	air1	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529216	2542059	2541349	278537	277860	SPAC328.06	SPBP35G2.08c	ubp2	air1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529217	2541710	2541349	278205	277860	SPAC343.11c	SPBP35G2.08c	msc1	air1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529218	2543452	2541349	279872	277860	SPAC3G9.04	SPBP35G2.08c	ssu72	air1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529219	2543443	2541349	279863	277860	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBP35G2.08c	snt2	air1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529220	2543616	2541349	280030	277860	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBP35G2.08c	cwf21	air1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529221	2543384	2541349	279806	277860	SPAC637.06	SPBP35G2.08c	gmh5	air1	SPAC637.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.9176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529222	2542845	2541349	279291	277860	SPAC824.04	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC824.04	air1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529223	2543670	2541349	280084	277860	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBP35G2.08c	eme1	air1	mms4|slx2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529224	2539995	2541349	276539	277860	SPBC1105.09	SPBP35G2.08c	ubc15	air1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529225	2539604	2541349	276162	277860	SPBC1105.14	SPBP35G2.08c	rsv2	air1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.5329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529226	2539812	2541349	276362	277860	SPBC1347.02	SPBP35G2.08c	fkbp39	air1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529227	2540317	2541349	276847	277860	SPBC24C6.05	SPBP35G2.08c	sec28	air1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.26	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529228	2540353	2541349	276882	277860	SPBC2F12.12c	SPBP35G2.08c	cay1	air1	SPBC2F12.12c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529229	2540967	2541349	277483	277860	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC36B7.08c	air1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529230	2540979	2541349	277495	277860	SPBC3H7.10	SPBP35G2.08c	elp6	air1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529231	2541088	2541289	277603	277802	SPBC609.05	SPBP35G2.09	pob3	usp103	-	yhc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529232	2542239	2541336	278711	277847	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBP35G2.10	chp1	mit1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529233	2540513	2541336	277041	277847	SPBC29A3.08	SPBP35G2.10	pof4	mit1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529234	2540354	2541336	276883	277847	SPBC29A3.13	SPBP35G2.10	pdp1	mit1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529235	3361561	2541337	280637	277848	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBP35G2.13c	swr1	swc2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529236	2542833	2541337	279280	277848	SPAC13F5.01c	SPBP35G2.13c	msh1	swc2	SPAC23C11.18c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529237	2542809	2541337	279257	277848	SPAC15A10.11	SPBP35G2.13c	ubr11	swc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529238	2542278	2541337	278747	277848	SPAC17G8.07	SPBP35G2.13c	yaf9	swc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529239	2542513	2541337	278971	277848	SPAC1952.05	SPBP35G2.13c	gcn5	swc2	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529240	2543384	2541337	279806	277848	SPAC637.06	SPBP35G2.13c	gmh5	swc2	SPAC637.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529241	2539971	2541337	276515	277848	SPBC1105.04c	SPBP35G2.13c	cbp1	swc2	abp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529242	2539668	2541337	276223	277848	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBP35G2.13c	pht1	swc2	pi001	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529243	2540512	2541337	277040	277848	SPBC29A3.05	SPBP35G2.13c	vps71	swc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.1406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529244	2541468	2541358	277970	277869	SPAC1F5.09c	SPBP4H10.16c	shk2	SPBP4H10.16c	pak2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529245	2542592	2541358	279047	277869	SPAC328.01c	SPBP4H10.16c	msn5	SPBP4H10.16c	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529246	2541284	2541358	277797	277869	SPBC947.08c	SPBP4H10.16c	hip4	SPBP4H10.16c	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529247	2542701	2541361	279154	277872	SPAC26H5.05	SPBP8B7.10c	mga2	utp16	SPAC26H5.05	SPBP8B7.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529248	2541017	2541361	277532	277872	SPBC36.07	SPBP8B7.10c	elp1	utp16	iki3	SPBP8B7.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529249	3361506	2541373	280582	277884	SPAC17G8.09	SPBP8B7.18c	shg1	SPBP8B7.18c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529250	2539999	2541373	276543	277884	SPBC1734.15	SPBP8B7.18c	rsc4	SPBP8B7.18c	brd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529251	2541536	2541378	278036	277889	SPAC1071.02	SPBP8B7.21	mms19	ubp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529252	3361401	2541378	280477	277889	SPAC1093.03	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC1093.03	ubp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529253	2542833	2541378	279280	277889	SPAC13F5.01c	SPBP8B7.21	msh1	ubp3	SPAC23C11.18c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.0837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529254	2542363	2541378	278827	277889	SPAC1783.05	SPBP8B7.21	hrp1	ubp3	chd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529255	2542421	2541378	278884	277889	SPAC17G8.05	SPBP8B7.21	med20	ubp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529256	2542418	2541378	278881	277889	SPAC1805.07c	SPBP8B7.21	dad2	ubp3	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529257	2542519	2541378	278977	277889	SPAC19G12.08	SPBP8B7.21	scs7	ubp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529258	2541871	2541378	278361	277889	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBP8B7.21	res2	ubp3	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529259	2542036	2541378	278518	277889	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBP8B7.21	hrq1	ubp3	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529260	2542032	2541378	278514	277889	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBP8B7.21	pnk1	ubp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529261	2541531	2541378	278031	277889	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP8B7.21	fft3	ubp3	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529262	2541614	2541378	278111	277889	SPAC29A4.20	SPBP8B7.21	elp3	ubp3	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.2457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529263	2543384	2541378	279806	277889	SPAC637.06	SPBP8B7.21	gmh5	ubp3	SPAC637.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.8184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529264	2542102	2541378	278578	277889	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBP8B7.21	spc34	ubp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.5769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529265	2539930	2541378	276474	277889	SPBC1198.11c	SPBP8B7.21	reb1	ubp3	SPBC660.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529266	2539911	2541378	276456	277889	SPBC15D4.10c	SPBP8B7.21	amo1	ubp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.7052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529267	2540787	2541378	277306	277889	SPBC1921.07c	SPBP8B7.21	sgf29	ubp3	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529268	2540498	2541378	277026	277889	SPBC27.02c	SPBP8B7.21	ask1	ubp3	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529269	2540241	2541378	276773	277889	SPBC32H8.11	SPBP8B7.21	mei4	ubp3	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529270	2540995	2541378	277511	277889	SPBC337.16	SPBP8B7.21	cho1	ubp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529271	2541017	2541378	277532	277889	SPBC36.07	SPBP8B7.21	elp1	ubp3	iki3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529272	2540968	2541378	277484	277889	SPBC3H7.07c	SPBP8B7.21	ser2	ubp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529273	2540979	2541378	277495	277889	SPBC3H7.10	SPBP8B7.21	elp6	ubp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.2281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529274	2540825	2541378	277343	277889	SPBC428.08c	SPBP8B7.21	clr4	ubp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529275	2541109	2541378	277624	277889	SPBC6B1.02	SPBP8B7.21	ppk30	ubp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529276	2542469	2541395	278930	277904	SPAC19A8.04	SPBP8B7.25	erg5	cyp4	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529277	2540317	2541395	276847	277904	SPBC24C6.05	SPBP8B7.25	sec28	cyp4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529278	2539930	2541375	276474	277886	SPBC1198.11c	SPBP8B7.31	reb1	SPBP8B7.31	SPBC660.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529279	2540749	2541396	277271	277905	SPBC4B4.03	SPBPB10D8.02c	rsc1	SPBPB10D8.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529280	2541628	2541380	278124	277891	SPAC110.02	SPBPB2B2.13	pds5	gal1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529281	2542516	2541380	278974	277891	SPAC2F7.04	SPBPB2B2.13	pmc2	gal1	med1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529282	2542861	2538828	279307	275409	SPAC13G7.13c	SPCC1020.05	msa1	SPCC1020.05	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529283	2541650	2538828	278146	275409	SPAC14C4.12c	SPCC1020.05	laf1	SPCC1020.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529284	2540100	2538828	276638	275409	SPBC13E7.09	SPCC1020.05	vrp1	SPCC1020.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529285	2542418	2539303	278881	275871	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC1020.09	dad2	gnr1	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529286	2543529	2539303	279947	275871	SPAC4C5.02c	SPCC1020.09	ryh1	gnr1	hos1|sat7	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529287	2543384	2539303	279806	275871	SPAC637.06	SPCC1020.09	gmh5	gnr1	SPAC637.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529288	2543387	2539303	279809	275871	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC1020.09	mcl1	gnr1	slr3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529289	2539971	2539303	276515	275871	SPBC1105.04c	SPCC1020.09	cbp1	gnr1	abp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529290	2539911	2539303	276456	275871	SPBC15D4.10c	SPCC1020.09	amo1	gnr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529291	2541101	2539303	277616	275871	SPBC609.02	SPCC1020.09	ptn1	gnr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529292	2541095	2539303	277610	275871	SPBC725.06c	SPCC1020.09	ppk31	gnr1	mug25	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529293	2542513	2539239	278971	275809	SPAC1952.05	SPCC1020.10	gcn5	oca2	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529294	2543160	2539239	279591	275809	SPAC31A2.14	SPCC1020.10	bun107	oca2	wdr48	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529295	3361512	2539239	280588	275809	SPAC3C7.01c	SPCC1020.10	sac12	oca2	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529296	2540788	2539239	277307	275809	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC1020.10	swd2	oca2	swd2.1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529297	2542198	2538710	278673	275294	SPAC6F12.09	SPCC1020.12c	rdp1	xap5	rdr1	SPCC14G10.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529298	2541536	2538987	278036	275561	SPAC1071.02	SPCC11E10.06c	mms19	elp4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529299	2542925	2538987	279366	275561	SPAC11E3.04c	SPCC11E10.06c	ubc13	elp4	spu13|sst5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529300	2542513	2538987	278971	275561	SPAC1952.05	SPCC11E10.06c	gcn5	elp4	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529301	2542462	2538987	278923	275561	SPAC19B12.11c	SPCC11E10.06c	SPAC19B12.11c	elp4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529302	2541786	2538987	278278	275561	SPAC22F3.08c	SPCC11E10.06c	rok1	elp4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529303	2541614	2538987	278111	275561	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC11E10.06c	elp3	elp4	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.3167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529304	2542516	2538987	278974	275561	SPAC2F7.04	SPCC11E10.06c	pmc2	elp4	med1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529305	2543667	2538987	280081	275561	SPAC4H3.02c	SPCC11E10.06c	swc3	elp4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529306	2539812	2538987	276362	275561	SPBC1347.02	SPCC11E10.06c	fkbp39	elp4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529307	2539673	2538987	276228	275561	SPBC13G1.10c	SPCC11E10.06c	mug81	elp4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529308	2540077	2538987	276615	275561	SPBC17D11.04c	SPCC11E10.06c	nto1	elp4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529309	2540436	2538987	276964	275561	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC11E10.06c	ngg1	elp4	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529310	2540480	2538987	277008	275561	SPBC2A9.04c	SPCC11E10.06c	san1	elp4	SPBC2A9.04c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529311	2540999	2538987	277515	275561	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC11E10.06c	SPBC4B4.04	elp4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.0874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529312	2541378	2538987	277889	275561	SPBP8B7.21	SPCC11E10.06c	ubp3	elp4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529313	2542023	2539154	278506	275726	SPAC20H4.10	SPCC11E10.07c	ufd2	SPCC11E10.07c	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529314	2540306	2539154	276836	275726	SPBC2G5.02c	SPCC11E10.07c	ckb2	SPCC11E10.07c	SPBC2G5.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529315	2543263	2539050	279691	275623	SPAC1002.15c	SPCC11E10.08	med6	rik1	pmc5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.0567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529316	2541536	2539050	278036	275623	SPAC1071.02	SPCC11E10.08	mms19	rik1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529317	2542421	2539050	278884	275623	SPAC17G8.05	SPCC11E10.08	med20	rik1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.1504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529318	2542239	2539050	278711	275623	SPAC18G6.02c	SPCC11E10.08	chp1	rik1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529319	2541941	2539050	278428	275623	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC11E10.08	tfs1	rik1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529320	2542516	2539050	278974	275623	SPAC2F7.04	SPCC11E10.08	pmc2	rik1	med1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.0626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529321	2542198	2539050	278673	275623	SPAC6F12.09	SPCC11E10.08	rdp1	rik1	rdr1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.5108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529322	2541470	2539050	277972	275623	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPCC11E10.08	rpb9	rik1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529323	2540317	2539050	276847	275623	SPBC24C6.05	SPCC11E10.08	sec28	rik1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.8031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529324	2540825	2539050	277343	275623	SPBC428.08c	SPCC11E10.08	clr4	rik1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529325	2540735	2539050	277258	275623	SPBC83.03c	SPCC11E10.08	tas3	rik1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.7327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529326	2541373	2539050	277884	275623	SPBP8B7.18c	SPCC11E10.08	SPBP8B7.18c	rik1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529327	2541899	2539079	278389	275651	SPAC22E12.11c	SPCC1223.01	set3	SPCC1223.01	-	SPCC285.18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529328	2539812	2539079	276362	275651	SPBC1347.02	SPCC1223.01	fkbp39	SPCC1223.01	-	SPCC285.18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529329	2542833	2539104	279280	275676	SPAC13F5.01c	SPCC1223.10c	msh1	eaf1	SPAC23C11.18c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529330	2542809	2539104	279257	275676	SPAC15A10.11	SPCC1223.10c	ubr11	eaf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529331	2542701	2539104	279154	275676	SPAC26H5.05	SPCC1223.10c	mga2	eaf1	SPAC26H5.05	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529332	2543384	2539104	279806	275676	SPAC637.06	SPCC1223.10c	gmh5	eaf1	SPAC637.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529333	2543372	2539104	279794	275676	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC1223.10c	ase1	eaf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529334	2543670	2539104	280084	275676	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPCC1223.10c	eme1	eaf1	mms4|slx2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529335	2539971	2539104	276515	275676	SPBC1105.04c	SPCC1223.10c	cbp1	eaf1	abp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529336	2539911	2539104	276456	275676	SPBC15D4.10c	SPCC1223.10c	amo1	eaf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529337	2540322	2539104	276852	275676	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC1223.10c	SPBC31F10.10c	eaf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529338	2543372	2539252	279794	275822	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC1223.11	ase1	ptc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529339	2541378	2539252	277889	275822	SPBP8B7.21	SPCC1223.11	ubp3	ptc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529340	2541614	2539045	278111	275618	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC1235.05c	elp3	fft2	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529341	2539925	2539045	276469	275618	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC1235.05c	SPBC16H5.13	fft2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529342	2540822	2539045	277340	275618	SPBC18E5.05c	SPCC1235.05c	elp5	fft2	iki1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529343	2540317	2539045	276847	275618	SPBC24C6.05	SPCC1235.05c	sec28	fft2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.6785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529344	2540241	2539045	276773	275618	SPBC32H8.11	SPCC1235.05c	mei4	fft2	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529345	2543384	2538701	279806	275286	SPAC637.06	SPCC1235.09	gmh5	hif2	SPAC637.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529346	2541789	2538906	278281	275483	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC1259.03	iwr1	rpa12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.4367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529347	2541578	2538906	278075	275483	SPAC25B8.05	SPCC1259.03	deg1	rpa12	SPAC25B8.05	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529348	2541614	2538906	278111	275483	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC1259.03	elp3	rpa12	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529349	2543378	2538906	279800	275483	SPAC3H8.07c	SPCC1259.03	pac10	rpa12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529350	2543384	2538906	279806	275483	SPAC637.06	SPCC1259.03	gmh5	rpa12	SPAC637.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.9898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529351	2539995	2538906	276539	275483	SPBC1105.09	SPCC1259.03	ubc15	rpa12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529352	2540317	2538906	276847	275483	SPBC24C6.05	SPCC1259.03	sec28	rpa12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529353	2540244	2538906	276776	275483	SPBC336.01	SPCC1259.03	fbh1	rpa12	fdh|fdh1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529354	2541017	2538906	277532	275483	SPBC36.07	SPCC1259.03	elp1	rpa12	iki3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529355	2540979	2538906	277495	275483	SPBC3H7.10	SPCC1259.03	elp6	rpa12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529356	2541175	2538906	277689	275483	SPBC839.13c	SPCC1259.03	rpl1601	rpa12	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529357	2541330	2538906	277842	275483	SPBP35G2.06c	SPCC1259.03	nup131	rpa12	Nup133a	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529358	2541349	2538906	277860	275483	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC1259.03	air1	rpa12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.7249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529359	2540317	2539081	276847	275653	SPBC24C6.05	SPCC1259.09c	sec28	pdx1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.81	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529360	3361533	2538691	280609	275276	SPAC222.15	SPCC126.01c	meu13	SPCC126.01c	SPAC821.01	SPCC576.18c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529361	3361533	2539082	280609	275654	SPAC222.15	SPCC126.03	meu13	pus1	SPAC821.01	lps1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529362	2541496	2539058	277998	275631	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC126.07c	arp42	pbr1	arp4	SPCC126.07c|asr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529363	2539925	2539058	276469	275631	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC126.07c	SPBC16H5.13	pbr1	-	SPCC126.07c|asr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529364	2540967	2539058	277483	275631	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC126.07c	SPBC36B7.08c	pbr1	-	SPCC126.07c|asr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529365	2542519	2539066	278977	275638	SPAC19G12.08	SPCC126.13c	scs7	SPCC126.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529366	2542418	2538868	278881	275448	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC132.02	dad2	hst2	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529367	2540498	2538868	277026	275448	SPBC27.02c	SPCC132.02	ask1	hst2	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529368	2543529	2538800	279947	275381	SPAC4C5.02c	SPCC1322.06	ryh1	kap113	hos1|sat7	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529369	2542198	2538800	278673	275381	SPAC6F12.09	SPCC1322.06	rdp1	kap113	rdr1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529370	2539667	2538800	276222	275381	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC1322.06	ash2	kap113	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529371	2539911	2538800	276456	275381	SPBC15D4.10c	SPCC1322.06	amo1	kap113	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529372	2540749	2538800	277271	275381	SPBC4B4.03	SPCC1322.06	rsc1	kap113	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529373	2541208	2538800	277722	275381	SPBC887.04c	SPCC1322.06	lub1	kap113	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529374	2540498	2538890	277026	275468	SPBC27.02c	SPCC1393.02c	ask1	spt2	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529375	2540995	2538890	277511	275468	SPBC337.16	SPCC1393.02c	cho1	spt2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529376	2543263	2538690	279691	275275	SPAC1002.15c	SPCC1393.05	med6	ers1	pmc5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529377	2541536	2538690	278036	275275	SPAC1071.02	SPCC1393.05	mms19	ers1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529378	2542459	2538690	278920	275275	SPAC1D4.03c	SPCC1393.05	aut12	ers1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529379	2542516	2538690	278974	275275	SPAC2F7.04	SPCC1393.05	pmc2	ers1	med1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529380	2542198	2538690	278673	275275	SPAC6F12.09	SPCC1393.05	rdp1	ers1	rdr1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.6912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529381	2542021	2538690	278504	275275	SPAP14E8.02	SPCC1393.05	tos4	ers1	SPAP14E8.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529382	2539920	2538690	276464	275275	SPBC119.08	SPCC1393.05	pmk1	ers1	spm1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529383	2539911	2538690	276456	275275	SPBC15D4.10c	SPCC1393.05	amo1	ers1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529384	2539700	2538690	276253	275275	SPBC1685.15c	SPCC1393.05	klp6	ers1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.5265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529385	2540154	2538690	276690	275275	SPBC16C6.05	SPCC1393.05	SPBC16C6.05	ers1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529386	2540077	2538690	276615	275275	SPBC17D11.04c	SPCC1393.05	nto1	ers1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529387	2540317	2538690	276847	275275	SPBC24C6.05	SPCC1393.05	sec28	ers1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529388	2540967	2538690	277483	275275	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC1393.05	SPBC36B7.08c	ers1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529389	2540968	2538690	277484	275275	SPBC3H7.07c	SPCC1393.05	ser2	ers1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529390	2540825	2538690	277343	275275	SPBC428.08c	SPCC1393.05	clr4	ers1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.6348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529391	2540749	2538690	277271	275275	SPBC4B4.03	SPCC1393.05	rsc1	ers1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529392	2540735	2538690	277258	275275	SPBC83.03c	SPCC1393.05	tas3	ers1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.8309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529393	2539050	2538690	275623	275275	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC1393.05	rik1	ers1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.7056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529394	2541614	2538955	278111	275529	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC1450.02	elp3	bdf1	kat9	SPCC191.13|brf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529395	2539999	2538955	276543	275529	SPBC1734.15	SPCC1450.02	rsc4	bdf1	brd1	SPCC191.13|brf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529396	2540317	2538955	276847	275529	SPBC24C6.05	SPCC1450.02	sec28	bdf1	-	SPCC191.13|brf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529397	2540354	2538955	276883	275529	SPBC29A3.13	SPCC1450.02	pdp1	bdf1	-	SPCC191.13|brf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529398	2540749	2538955	277271	275529	SPBC4B4.03	SPCC1450.02	rsc1	bdf1	-	SPCC191.13|brf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529399	2542519	2539249	278977	275819	SPAC19G12.08	SPCC1450.05c	scs7	rox3	-	med19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.8421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529400	2541531	2539249	278031	275819	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1450.05c	fft3	rox3	snf2SR	med19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529401	2541614	2539249	278111	275819	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC1450.05c	elp3	rox3	kat9	med19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529402	2543384	2539249	279806	275819	SPAC637.06	SPCC1450.05c	gmh5	rox3	SPAC637.06	med19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529403	2543670	2539249	280084	275819	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPCC1450.05c	eme1	rox3	mms4|slx2	med19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529404	2540436	2539249	276964	275819	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC1450.05c	ngg1	rox3	ada3|kap1	med19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529405	2540219	2539249	276752	275819	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC1450.05c	hip1	rox3	hir1	med19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529406	2540320	2539249	276850	275819	SPBC3D6.04c	SPCC1450.05c	mad1	rox3	-	med19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529407	2540979	2539249	277495	275819	SPBC3H7.10	SPCC1450.05c	elp6	rox3	-	med19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529408	2540825	2539249	277343	275819	SPBC428.08c	SPCC1450.05c	clr4	rox3	-	med19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529409	2540735	2539249	277258	275819	SPBC83.03c	SPCC1450.05c	tas3	rox3	-	med19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529410	2541284	2539249	277797	275819	SPBC947.08c	SPCC1450.05c	hip4	rox3	hpc2	med19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529411	2538690	2539249	275275	275819	SPCC1393.05	SPCC1450.05c	ers1	rox3	-	med19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529412	2541536	2539208	278036	275778	SPAC1071.02	SPCC1450.11c	mms19	cek1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529413	2541628	2539208	278124	275778	SPAC110.02	SPCC1450.11c	pds5	cek1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529414	5802929	2539208	858067	275778	SPAC1556.08c	SPCC1450.11c	cbs2	cek1	SPAC1F12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529415	2542207	2539208	278682	275778	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC1450.11c	ddb1	cek1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529416	2541776	2539208	278270	275778	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC1450.11c	swd1	cek1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529417	2541531	2539208	278031	275778	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1450.11c	fft3	cek1	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529418	2543384	2539208	279806	275778	SPAC637.06	SPCC1450.11c	gmh5	cek1	SPAC637.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529419	2543372	2539208	279794	275778	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC1450.11c	ase1	cek1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529420	2543670	2539208	280084	275778	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPCC1450.11c	eme1	cek1	mms4|slx2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529421	2539667	2539208	276222	275778	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC1450.11c	ash2	cek1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529422	2540749	2539208	277271	275778	SPBC4B4.03	SPCC1450.11c	rsc1	cek1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529423	2541575	2538946	278072	275520	SPAC12B10.01c	SPCC162.11c	SPAC12B10.01c	SPCC162.11c	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529424	2541580	2538946	278077	275520	SPAC1687.05	SPCC162.11c	pli1	SPCC162.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529425	2542109	2538946	278585	275520	SPAC1687.16c	SPCC162.11c	erg31	SPCC162.11c	erg3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529426	2542318	2538946	278784	275520	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC162.11c	cph1	SPCC162.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529427	2542277	2538946	278746	275520	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC162.11c	dbr1	SPCC162.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529428	2542168	2538946	278643	275520	SPAC17A5.16	SPCC162.11c	ftp105	SPCC162.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.8038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529429	2542145	2538946	278621	275520	SPAC17C9.09c	SPCC162.11c	tim13	SPCC162.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.5423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529430	2542469	2538946	278930	275520	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC162.11c	erg5	SPCC162.11c	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529431	2542519	2538946	278977	275520	SPAC19G12.08	SPCC162.11c	scs7	SPCC162.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529432	2541468	2538946	277970	275520	SPAC1F5.09c	SPCC162.11c	shk2	SPCC162.11c	pak2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.5292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529433	2541846	2538946	278337	275520	SPAC20G4.01	SPCC162.11c	caf16	SPCC162.11c	SPAC22F8.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529434	2541746	2538946	278240	275520	SPAC20G4.04c	SPCC162.11c	hus1	SPCC162.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529435	2542066	2538946	278543	275520	SPAC227.05	SPCC162.11c	SPAC227.05	SPCC162.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529436	2541899	2538946	278389	275520	SPAC22E12.11c	SPCC162.11c	set3	SPCC162.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.7602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529437	2542032	2538946	278514	275520	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC162.11c	pnk1	SPCC162.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529438	2541496	2538946	277998	275520	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC162.11c	arp42	SPCC162.11c	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.4426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529439	2541845	2538946	278336	275520	SPAC23G3.08c	SPCC162.11c	ubp7	SPCC162.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.7934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529440	2542081	2538946	278558	275520	SPAC26H5.04	SPCC162.11c	SPAC26H5.04	SPCC162.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.7005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529441	2542701	2538946	279154	275520	SPAC26H5.05	SPCC162.11c	mga2	SPCC162.11c	SPAC26H5.05	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3462	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529442	2541801	2538946	278292	275520	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC162.11c	snf5	SPCC162.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529443	2543160	2538946	279591	275520	SPAC31A2.14	SPCC162.11c	bun107	SPCC162.11c	wdr48	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.8399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529444	2542592	2538946	279047	275520	SPAC328.01c	SPCC162.11c	msn5	SPCC162.11c	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.3379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529445	2543106	2538946	279538	275520	SPAC3A11.13	SPCC162.11c	SPAC3A11.13	SPCC162.11c	SPAC3H5.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529446	2543452	2538946	279872	275520	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC162.11c	ssu72	SPCC162.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529447	2543378	2538946	279800	275520	SPAC3H8.07c	SPCC162.11c	pac10	SPCC162.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.3862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529448	2539812	2538946	276362	275520	SPBC1347.02	SPCC162.11c	fkbp39	SPCC162.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.7803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529449	2539999	2538946	276543	275520	SPBC1734.15	SPCC162.11c	rsc4	SPCC162.11c	brd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529450	2540480	2538946	277008	275520	SPBC2A9.04c	SPCC162.11c	san1	SPCC162.11c	SPBC2A9.04c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529451	3361323	2538946	280399	275520	SPBC30D10.04	SPCC162.11c	swi3	SPCC162.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529452	2540968	2538946	277484	275520	SPBC3H7.07c	SPCC162.11c	ser2	SPCC162.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529453	2540979	2538946	277495	275520	SPBC3H7.10	SPCC162.11c	elp6	SPCC162.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529454	2541175	2538946	277689	275520	SPBC839.13c	SPCC162.11c	rpl1601	SPCC162.11c	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.9904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529455	2539066	2538946	275638	275520	SPCC126.13c	SPCC162.11c	SPCC126.13c	SPCC162.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529456	2541498	2539366	278000	275932	SPAC227.10	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC227.10	pef1	-	p31	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529457	2541479	2539366	277981	275932	SPAC27F1.06c	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC27F1.06c	pef1	-	p31	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529458	2542094	2539366	278571	275932	SPAC29B12.06c	SPCC16C4.11	rcd1	pef1	-	p31	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529459	2543101	2539366	279533	275932	SPAC323.03c	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC323.03c	pef1	-	p31	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529460	2543346	2539366	279768	275932	SPAC688.14	SPCC16C4.11	set13	pef1	-	p31	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529461	2539604	2539366	276162	275932	SPBC1105.14	SPCC16C4.11	rsv2	pef1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	p31	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529462	2539665	2539366	276220	275932	SPBC1604.19c	SPCC16C4.11	trs8501	pef1	SPBC1604.19c	p31	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529463	2540276	2539366	276807	275932	SPBC2A9.03	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC2A9.03	pef1	-	p31	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529464	2540860	2539366	277377	275932	SPBC428.17c	SPCC16C4.11	wpl1	pef1	-	p31	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529465	2540260	2539366	276791	275932	SPBC577.03c	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC577.03c	pef1	-	p31	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529466	2541175	2539366	277689	275932	SPBC839.13c	SPCC16C4.11	rpl1601	pef1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	p31	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529467	2541208	2539366	277722	275932	SPBC887.04c	SPCC16C4.11	lub1	pef1	-	p31	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529468	2541287	2539366	277800	275932	SPBP22H7.05c	SPCC16C4.11	abo2	pef1	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	p31	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529469	2543263	2539248	279691	275818	SPAC1002.15c	SPCC1739.03	med6	hrr1	pmc5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529470	2541536	2539248	278036	275818	SPAC1071.02	SPCC1739.03	mms19	hrr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.4856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529471	2542840	2539248	279286	275818	SPAC13G6.08	SPCC1739.03	SPAC13G6.08	hrr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529472	2542309	2539248	278775	275818	SPAC16A10.02	SPCC1739.03	sub1	hrr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529473	2542141	2539248	278617	275818	SPAC17C9.05c	SPCC1739.03	pmc3	hrr1	med27|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529474	2542421	2539248	278884	275818	SPAC17G8.05	SPCC1739.03	med20	hrr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529475	2542239	2539248	278711	275818	SPAC18G6.02c	SPCC1739.03	chp1	hrr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.6276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529476	2543164	2539248	279595	275818	SPAC3G6.06c	SPCC1739.03	rad2	hrr1	fen1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529477	2541633	2539248	278129	275818	SPAC664.01c	SPCC1739.03	swi6	hrr1	SPAC824.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529478	2542198	2539248	278673	275818	SPAC6F12.09	SPCC1739.03	rdp1	hrr1	rdr1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529479	2542021	2539248	278504	275818	SPAP14E8.02	SPCC1739.03	tos4	hrr1	SPAP14E8.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529480	2541470	2539248	277972	275818	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPCC1739.03	rpb9	hrr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.0399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529481	2539995	2539248	276539	275818	SPBC1105.09	SPCC1739.03	ubc15	hrr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529482	2539726	2539248	276278	275818	SPBC13E7.08c	SPCC1739.03	leo1	hrr1	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529483	2539667	2539248	276222	275818	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC1739.03	ash2	hrr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529484	2539700	2539248	276253	275818	SPBC1685.15c	SPCC1739.03	klp6	hrr1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.9634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529485	2540154	2539248	276690	275818	SPBC16C6.05	SPCC1739.03	SPBC16C6.05	hrr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529486	2540077	2539248	276615	275818	SPBC17D11.04c	SPCC1739.03	nto1	hrr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.9745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529487	2540317	2539248	276847	275818	SPBC24C6.05	SPCC1739.03	sec28	hrr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529488	2540337	2539248	276866	275818	SPBC28F2.11	SPCC1739.03	hmo1	hrr1	SPBC28F2.11	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529489	2540346	2539248	276875	275818	SPBC2F12.03c	SPCC1739.03	ebs1	hrr1	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529490	2540416	2539248	276944	275818	SPBC30B4.02c	SPCC1739.03	SPBC30B4.02c	hrr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529491	2540221	2539248	276754	275818	SPBC32F12.02	SPCC1739.03	rec14	hrr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529492	2540825	2539248	277343	275818	SPBC428.08c	SPCC1739.03	clr4	hrr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.4263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529493	2540260	2539248	276791	275818	SPBC577.03c	SPCC1739.03	SPBC577.03c	hrr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529494	2541336	2539248	277847	275818	SPBP35G2.10	SPCC1739.03	mit1	hrr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529495	2541378	2539248	277889	275818	SPBP8B7.21	SPCC1739.03	ubp3	hrr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529496	2539303	2539248	275871	275818	SPCC1020.09	SPCC1739.03	gnr1	hrr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529497	2539050	2539248	275623	275818	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC1739.03	rik1	hrr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.2759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529498	2538690	2539248	275275	275818	SPCC1393.05	SPCC1739.03	ers1	hrr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529499	2542469	2539041	278930	275614	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC18.06c	erg5	caf1	cyp61	pop2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529500	2542519	2539041	278977	275614	SPAC19G12.08	SPCC18.06c	scs7	caf1	-	pop2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.4861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529501	2541614	2539041	278111	275614	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC18.06c	elp3	caf1	kat9	pop2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529502	2540100	2539041	276638	275614	SPBC13E7.09	SPCC18.06c	vrp1	caf1	-	pop2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529503	2539900	2539041	276446	275614	SPBC17D11.02c	SPCC18.06c	hrd1	caf1	-	pop2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529504	2541349	2539041	277860	275614	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC18.06c	air1	caf1	-	pop2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529505	2540241	2538966	276773	275540	SPBC32H8.11	SPCC18.10	mei4	SPCC18.10	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529506	2540251	2538966	276783	275540	SPBC336.05c	SPCC18.10	SPBC336.05c	SPCC18.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529507	2542066	2539145	278543	275717	SPAC227.05	SPCC18.11c	SPAC227.05	sdc1	-	dpy30	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529508	2543378	2539145	279800	275717	SPAC3H8.07c	SPCC18.11c	pac10	sdc1	-	dpy30	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529509	2540436	2539145	276964	275717	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC18.11c	ngg1	sdc1	ada3|kap1	dpy30	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529510	2542513	2539246	278971	275816	SPAC1952.05	SPCC18.13	gcn5	SPCC18.13	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529511	2542469	2539246	278930	275816	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC18.13	erg5	SPCC18.13	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529512	2542007	2539246	278490	275816	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC18.13	rad57	SPCC18.13	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529513	2543452	2539246	279872	275816	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC18.13	ssu72	SPCC18.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529514	2543670	2539246	280084	275816	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPCC18.13	eme1	SPCC18.13	mms4|slx2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529515	2540436	2539246	276964	275816	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC18.13	ngg1	SPCC18.13	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529516	2540979	2539246	277495	275816	SPBC3H7.10	SPCC18.13	elp6	SPCC18.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529517	2542519	2539379	278977	275945	SPAC19G12.08	SPCC188.02	scs7	par1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529518	2542023	2539379	278506	275945	SPAC20H4.10	SPCC188.02	ufd2	par1	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529519	2543263	2538930	279691	275506	SPAC1002.15c	SPCC188.13c	med6	dcr1	pmc5	SPCC584.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.5405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529520	2541536	2538930	278036	275506	SPAC1071.02	SPCC188.13c	mms19	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529521	3361381	2538930	280457	275506	SPAC12G12.01c	SPCC188.13c	SPAC12G12.01c	dcr1	SPAC630.02	SPCC584.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529522	2541529	2538930	278029	275506	SPAC1687.13c	SPCC188.13c	csn5	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529523	2542309	2538930	278775	275506	SPAC16A10.02	SPCC188.13c	sub1	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529524	2542141	2538930	278617	275506	SPAC17C9.05c	SPCC188.13c	pmc3	dcr1	med27|prk1	SPCC584.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529525	2542421	2538930	278884	275506	SPAC17G8.05	SPCC188.13c	med20	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529526	2542239	2538930	278711	275506	SPAC18G6.02c	SPCC188.13c	chp1	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529527	2541871	2538930	278361	275506	SPAC22F3.09c	SPCC188.13c	res2	dcr1	mcs1|pct1	SPCC584.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529528	2542516	2538930	278974	275506	SPAC2F7.04	SPCC188.13c	pmc2	dcr1	med1	SPCC584.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.5221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529529	2541633	2538930	278129	275506	SPAC664.01c	SPCC188.13c	swi6	dcr1	SPAC824.10c	SPCC584.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529530	2542021	2538930	278504	275506	SPAP14E8.02	SPCC188.13c	tos4	dcr1	SPAP14E8.02	SPCC584.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529531	2541470	2538930	277972	275506	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPCC188.13c	rpb9	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529532	2539920	2538930	276464	275506	SPBC119.08	SPCC188.13c	pmk1	dcr1	spm1	SPCC584.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529533	2539726	2538930	276278	275506	SPBC13E7.08c	SPCC188.13c	leo1	dcr1	SPBC13E7.08c	SPCC584.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529534	2539911	2538930	276456	275506	SPBC15D4.10c	SPCC188.13c	amo1	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529535	2539700	2538930	276253	275506	SPBC1685.15c	SPCC188.13c	klp6	dcr1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	SPCC584.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.2425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529536	2540077	2538930	276615	275506	SPBC17D11.04c	SPCC188.13c	nto1	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529537	2540317	2538930	276847	275506	SPBC24C6.05	SPCC188.13c	sec28	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529538	2540337	2538930	276866	275506	SPBC28F2.11	SPCC188.13c	hmo1	dcr1	SPBC28F2.11	SPCC584.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529539	2540825	2538930	277343	275506	SPBC428.08c	SPCC188.13c	clr4	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.9327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529540	2540919	2538930	277435	275506	SPBC543.07	SPCC188.13c	pek1	dcr1	mkk1|skh1	SPCC584.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529541	2540735	2538930	277258	275506	SPBC83.03c	SPCC188.13c	tas3	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.0767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529542	2538690	2538930	275275	275506	SPCC1393.05	SPCC188.13c	ers1	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529543	2543384	2539014	279806	275587	SPAC637.06	SPCC18B5.05c	gmh5	SPCC18B5.05c	SPAC637.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529544	2540436	2539014	276964	275587	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC18B5.05c	ngg1	SPCC18B5.05c	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529545	2540322	2539014	276852	275587	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC18B5.05c	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC18B5.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529546	2540749	2539014	277271	275587	SPBC4B4.03	SPCC18B5.05c	rsc1	SPCC18B5.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529547	2543263	2539348	279691	275914	SPAC1002.15c	SPCC18B5.07c	med6	nup61	pmc5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.8744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529548	2542833	2539348	279280	275914	SPAC13F5.01c	SPCC18B5.07c	msh1	nup61	SPAC23C11.18c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529549	2542421	2539348	278884	275914	SPAC17G8.05	SPCC18B5.07c	med20	nup61	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.1762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529550	2542541	2539348	278998	275914	SPAC1B3.03c	SPCC18B5.07c	wis2	nup61	cyp5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529551	2542032	2539348	278514	275914	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC18B5.07c	pnk1	nup61	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529552	2543529	2539348	279947	275914	SPAC4C5.02c	SPCC18B5.07c	ryh1	nup61	hos1|sat7	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.6709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529553	2539971	2539348	276515	275914	SPBC1105.04c	SPCC18B5.07c	cbp1	nup61	abp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529554	2540436	2539348	276964	275914	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC18B5.07c	ngg1	nup61	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529555	2540220	2539348	276753	275914	SPBC337.03	SPCC18B5.07c	rhn1	nup61	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529556	2541017	2539348	277532	275914	SPBC36.07	SPCC18B5.07c	elp1	nup61	iki3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529557	2540979	2539348	277495	275914	SPBC3H7.10	SPCC18B5.07c	elp6	nup61	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529558	2540219	2539362	276752	275928	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC18B5.10c	hip1	SPCC18B5.10c	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529559	2543384	2538959	279806	275533	SPAC637.06	SPCC18B5.11c	gmh5	cds1	SPAC637.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529560	2540822	2538959	277340	275533	SPBC18E5.05c	SPCC18B5.11c	elp5	cds1	iki1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529561	2539248	2538959	275818	275533	SPCC1739.03	SPCC18B5.11c	hrr1	cds1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529562	3361401	2539130	280477	275702	SPAC1093.03	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1093.03	amk2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529563	3361381	2539130	280457	275702	SPAC12G12.01c	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC12G12.01c	amk2	SPAC630.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529564	3361478	2539130	280554	275702	SPAC13A11.06	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC13A11.06	amk2	SPAC3H8.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529565	2542809	2539130	279257	275702	SPAC15A10.11	SPCC1919.03c	ubr11	amk2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.9735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529566	2542318	2539130	278784	275702	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC1919.03c	cph1	amk2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.2629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529567	2541468	2539130	277970	275702	SPAC1F5.09c	SPCC1919.03c	shk2	amk2	pak2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529568	2542007	2539130	278490	275702	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC1919.03c	rad57	amk2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529569	3361533	2539130	280609	275702	SPAC222.15	SPCC1919.03c	meu13	amk2	SPAC821.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529570	2542701	2539130	279154	275702	SPAC26H5.05	SPCC1919.03c	mga2	amk2	SPAC26H5.05	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.8601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529571	2543106	2539130	279538	275702	SPAC3A11.13	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC3A11.13	amk2	SPAC3H5.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.08	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529572	2543619	2539130	280033	275702	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC1919.03c	ypa1	amk2	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.4733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529573	2543384	2539130	279806	275702	SPAC637.06	SPCC1919.03c	gmh5	amk2	SPAC637.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529574	2543563	2539130	279979	275702	SPAC664.02c	SPCC1919.03c	arp8	amk2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529575	2543289	2539130	279714	275702	SPAC9E9.08	SPCC1919.03c	rad26	amk2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529576	2542192	2539130	278667	275702	SPAC9G1.12	SPCC1919.03c	cpd1	amk2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529577	2543372	2539130	279794	275702	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC1919.03c	ase1	amk2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529578	2543670	2539130	280084	275702	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPCC1919.03c	eme1	amk2	mms4|slx2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529579	2539971	2539130	276515	275702	SPBC1105.04c	SPCC1919.03c	cbp1	amk2	abp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529580	2540337	2539130	276866	275702	SPBC28F2.11	SPCC1919.03c	hmo1	amk2	SPBC28F2.11	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529581	3361323	2539130	280399	275702	SPBC30D10.04	SPCC1919.03c	swi3	amk2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529582	2541017	2539130	277532	275702	SPBC36.07	SPCC1919.03c	elp1	amk2	iki3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.7623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529583	2540320	2539130	276850	275702	SPBC3D6.04c	SPCC1919.03c	mad1	amk2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.4406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529584	2540979	2539130	277495	275702	SPBC3H7.10	SPCC1919.03c	elp6	amk2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529585	2541109	2539130	277624	275702	SPBC6B1.02	SPCC1919.03c	ppk30	amk2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529586	2541284	2539130	277797	275702	SPBC947.08c	SPCC1919.03c	hip4	amk2	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529587	2541614	2539136	278111	275708	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC1919.05	elp3	SPCC1919.05	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529588	2540822	2539136	277340	275708	SPBC18E5.05c	SPCC1919.05	elp5	SPCC1919.05	iki1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529589	2540244	2539136	276776	275708	SPBC336.01	SPCC1919.05	fbh1	SPCC1919.05	fdh|fdh1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529590	2539366	2539136	275932	275708	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC1919.05	pef1	SPCC1919.05	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529591	2543263	2539319	279691	275885	SPAC1002.15c	SPCC1919.13c	med6	SPCC1919.13c	pmc5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529592	2542924	2539319	279365	275885	SPAC12B10.04	SPCC1919.13c	pby1	SPCC1919.13c	SPAC12B10.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529593	2541650	2539319	278146	275885	SPAC14C4.12c	SPCC1919.13c	laf1	SPCC1919.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529594	2542349	2539319	278814	275885	SPAC1782.05	SPCC1919.13c	ypa2	SPCC1919.13c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529595	2539971	2539319	276515	275885	SPBC1105.04c	SPCC1919.13c	cbp1	SPCC1919.13c	abp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529596	2539812	2539319	276362	275885	SPBC1347.02	SPCC1919.13c	fkbp39	SPCC1919.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529597	2541017	2539319	277532	275885	SPBC36.07	SPCC1919.13c	elp1	SPCC1919.13c	iki3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529598	2539847	2539319	276395	275885	SPBC530.14c	SPCC1919.13c	dsk1	SPCC1919.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529599	2538906	2539319	275483	275885	SPCC1259.03	SPCC1919.13c	rpa12	SPCC1919.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529600	2542513	2539209	278971	275779	SPAC1952.05	SPCC23B6.03c	gcn5	tel1	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529601	2542516	2539098	278974	275670	SPAC2F7.04	SPCC24B10.18	pmc2	SPCC24B10.18	med1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529602	2539651	2539098	276206	275670	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC24B10.18	srb11	SPCC24B10.18	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529603	2543384	2539310	279806	275877	SPAC637.06	SPCC285.17	gmh5	spp27	SPAC637.06	uaf30	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529604	2540317	2539310	276847	275877	SPBC24C6.05	SPCC285.17	sec28	spp27	-	uaf30	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529605	2540979	2539310	277495	275877	SPBC3H7.10	SPCC285.17	elp6	spp27	-	uaf30	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529606	2542318	2538762	278784	275345	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC306.04c	cph1	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.9853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529607	2542252	2538762	278722	275345	SPAC17A2.13c	SPCC306.04c	rad25	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529608	2541468	2538762	277970	275345	SPAC1F5.09c	SPCC306.04c	shk2	set1	pak2	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529609	2541781	2538762	278274	275345	SPAC23G3.07c	SPCC306.04c	snf30	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529610	2541776	2538762	278270	275345	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC306.04c	swd1	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.5132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529611	2542701	2538762	279154	275345	SPAC26H5.05	SPCC306.04c	mga2	set1	SPAC26H5.05	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529612	2543106	2538762	279538	275345	SPAC3A11.13	SPCC306.04c	SPAC3A11.13	set1	SPAC3H5.02	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529613	2543378	2538762	279800	275345	SPAC3H8.07c	SPCC306.04c	pac10	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529614	2543529	2538762	279947	275345	SPAC4C5.02c	SPCC306.04c	ryh1	set1	hos1|sat7	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529615	2539971	2538762	276515	275345	SPBC1105.04c	SPCC306.04c	cbp1	set1	abp1	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529616	2540100	2538762	276638	275345	SPBC13E7.09	SPCC306.04c	vrp1	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529617	2539667	2538762	276222	275345	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC306.04c	ash2	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.5858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529618	2539785	2538762	276335	275345	SPBC1773.16c	SPCC306.04c	SPBC1773.16c	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529619	2540788	2538762	277307	275345	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC306.04c	swd2	set1	swd2.1	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.4689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529620	2540995	2538762	277511	275345	SPBC337.16	SPCC306.04c	cho1	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529621	2540929	2538762	277445	275345	SPBC354.03	SPCC306.04c	swd3	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.0955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529622	2541166	2538762	277681	275345	SPBC725.15	SPCC306.04c	ura5	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529623	2541208	2538762	277722	275345	SPBC887.04c	SPCC306.04c	lub1	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529624	2541292	2538762	277804	275345	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC306.04c	sdh4	set1	tim18	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529625	2539145	2538762	275717	275345	SPCC18.11c	SPCC306.04c	sdc1	set1	dpy30	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529626	2543516	2538926	279934	275502	SPAC4F10.11	SPCC306.07c	spn1	SPCC306.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529627	2543577	2538926	279992	275502	SPAC4H3.05	SPCC306.07c	srs2	SPCC306.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529628	2543668	2538926	280082	275502	SPAC9.05	SPCC306.07c	fml1	SPCC306.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529629	2543289	2538926	279714	275502	SPAC9E9.08	SPCC306.07c	rad26	SPCC306.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529630	2540512	2538926	277040	275502	SPBC29A3.05	SPCC306.07c	vps71	SPCC306.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529631	2539066	2538926	275638	275502	SPCC126.13c	SPCC306.07c	SPCC126.13c	SPCC306.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529632	2541628	2538913	278124	275490	SPAC110.02	SPCC31H12.08c	pds5	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529633	3361478	2538913	280554	275490	SPAC13A11.06	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC13A11.06	ccr4	SPAC3H8.01	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529634	2542861	2538913	279307	275490	SPAC13G7.13c	SPCC31H12.08c	msa1	ccr4	SPAC6C3.01c	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529635	2542764	2538913	279214	275490	SPAC15E1.10	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC15E1.10	ccr4	SPAP7G5.01	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529636	2542349	2538913	278814	275490	SPAC1782.05	SPCC31H12.08c	ypa2	ccr4	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529637	2542363	2538913	278827	275490	SPAC1783.05	SPCC31H12.08c	hrp1	ccr4	chd1	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.9144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529638	2542168	2538913	278643	275490	SPAC17A5.16	SPCC31H12.08c	ftp105	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.2998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529639	2542469	2538913	278930	275490	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC31H12.08c	erg5	ccr4	cyp61	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.3338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529640	2542519	2538913	278977	275490	SPAC19G12.08	SPCC31H12.08c	scs7	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.1815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529641	2542541	2538913	278998	275490	SPAC1B3.03c	SPCC31H12.08c	wis2	ccr4	cyp5	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.8368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529642	2541979	2538913	278464	275490	SPAC23A1.07	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC23A1.07	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529643	2541578	2538913	278075	275490	SPAC25B8.05	SPCC31H12.08c	deg1	ccr4	SPAC25B8.05	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529644	2542516	2538913	278974	275490	SPAC2F7.04	SPCC31H12.08c	pmc2	ccr4	med1	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.3395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529645	2543101	2538913	279533	275490	SPAC323.03c	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC323.03c	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.8805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529646	2542059	2538913	278537	275490	SPAC328.06	SPCC31H12.08c	ubp2	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.4922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529647	2543118	2538913	279550	275490	SPAC3G6.11	SPCC31H12.08c	chl1	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529648	2543423	2538913	279844	275490	SPAC4H3.07c	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC4H3.07c	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529649	2542891	2538913	279335	275490	SPAC6F12.12	SPCC31H12.08c	par2	ccr4	pbp2	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529650	2539726	2538913	276278	275490	SPBC13E7.08c	SPCC31H12.08c	leo1	ccr4	SPBC13E7.08c	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529651	2540100	2538913	276638	275490	SPBC13E7.09	SPCC31H12.08c	vrp1	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529652	2539740	2538913	276292	275490	SPBC1685.04	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC1685.04	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529653	2539956	2538913	276500	275490	SPBC16E9.11c	SPCC31H12.08c	pub3	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529654	2539900	2538913	276446	275490	SPBC17D11.02c	SPCC31H12.08c	hrd1	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529655	2540837	2538913	277355	275490	SPBC18H10.08c	SPCC31H12.08c	ubp4	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529656	2540317	2538913	276847	275490	SPBC24C6.05	SPCC31H12.08c	sec28	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.7598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529657	2540513	2538913	277041	275490	SPBC29A3.08	SPCC31H12.08c	pof4	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529658	2540353	2538913	276882	275490	SPBC2F12.12c	SPCC31H12.08c	cay1	ccr4	SPBC2F12.12c	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.3081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529659	2540373	2538913	276902	275490	SPBC2G2.05	SPCC31H12.08c	rpl1603	ccr4	rpl16c	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529660	2540306	2538913	276836	275490	SPBC2G5.02c	SPCC31H12.08c	ckb2	ccr4	SPBC2G5.02c	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529661	2540219	2538913	276752	275490	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC31H12.08c	hip1	ccr4	hir1	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529662	2541017	2538913	277532	275490	SPBC36.07	SPCC31H12.08c	elp1	ccr4	iki3	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529663	2540979	2538913	277495	275490	SPBC3H7.10	SPCC31H12.08c	elp6	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.2582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529664	2541147	2538913	277662	275490	SPBC651.05c	SPCC31H12.08c	dot2	ccr4	vps22	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529665	2541292	2538913	277804	275490	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC31H12.08c	sdh4	ccr4	tim18	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.6297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529666	2541378	2538913	277889	275490	SPBP8B7.21	SPCC31H12.08c	ubp3	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529667	2541395	2538913	277904	275490	SPBP8B7.25	SPCC31H12.08c	cyp4	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529668	2539041	2538913	275614	275490	SPCC18.06c	SPCC31H12.08c	caf1	ccr4	pop2	SPCC5E4.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.8704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529669	2542519	2539538	278977	276100	SPAC19G12.08	SPCC364.06	scs7	nap1	-	nap11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.5573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529670	2539971	2539538	276515	276100	SPBC1105.04c	SPCC364.06	cbp1	nap1	abp1	nap11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.5679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529671	2539911	2539538	276456	276100	SPBC15D4.10c	SPCC364.06	amo1	nap1	-	nap11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529672	2540244	2539538	276776	276100	SPBC336.01	SPCC364.06	fbh1	nap1	fdh|fdh1	nap11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529673	2539130	2539538	275702	276100	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC364.06	amk2	nap1	-	nap11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529674	2539920	2539482	276464	276045	SPBC119.08	SPCC417.06c	pmk1	mug27	spm1	ppk35|slk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529675	2538913	2538965	275490	275539	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC417.09c	ccr4	SPCC417.09c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529676	2540244	2539545	276776	276106	SPBC336.01	SPCC4B3.12	fbh1	set9	fdh|fdh1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529677	2540749	2539545	277271	276106	SPBC4B4.03	SPCC4B3.12	rsc1	set9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529678	2542469	2539375	278930	275941	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC4G3.11	erg5	mug154	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529679	2541789	2539375	278281	275941	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC4G3.11	iwr1	mug154	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529680	2542701	2539375	279154	275941	SPAC26H5.05	SPCC4G3.11	mga2	mug154	SPAC26H5.05	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.1211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529681	2541801	2539375	278292	275941	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC4G3.11	snf5	mug154	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529682	2543101	2539375	279533	275941	SPAC323.03c	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC323.03c	mug154	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529683	2541713	2539375	278208	275941	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC4G3.11	atp11	mug154	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529684	2539956	2539375	276500	275941	SPBC16E9.11c	SPCC4G3.11	pub3	mug154	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529685	2540765	2539375	277285	275941	SPBC1D7.01	SPCC4G3.11	pfd1	mug154	SPBC1D7.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529686	2540664	2539375	277189	275941	SPBC215.02	SPCC4G3.11	bob1	mug154	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529687	2540396	2539375	276924	275941	SPBC31F10.12	SPCC4G3.11	tma20	mug154	SPBC31F10.12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529688	2541786	2538778	278278	275359	SPAC22F3.08c	SPCC4G3.15c	rok1	not2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529689	2541614	2538778	278111	275359	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC4G3.15c	elp3	not2	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529690	2543384	2538778	279806	275359	SPAC637.06	SPCC4G3.15c	gmh5	not2	SPAC637.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.6729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529691	2540019	2538778	276563	275359	SPBC1685.01	SPCC4G3.15c	pmp1	not2	dsp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529692	2540822	2538778	277340	275359	SPBC18E5.05c	SPCC4G3.15c	elp5	not2	iki1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529693	2540322	2538778	276852	275359	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC4G3.15c	SPBC31F10.10c	not2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529694	2540219	2538778	276752	275359	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC4G3.15c	hip1	not2	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.0611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529695	2541284	2538778	277797	275359	SPBC947.08c	SPCC4G3.15c	hip4	not2	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529696	2541349	2538778	277860	275359	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC4G3.15c	air1	not2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529697	2539971	2539314	276515	275880	SPBC1105.04c	SPCC548.05c	cbp1	dbl5	abp1	SPCC548.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529698	2541284	2539314	277797	275880	SPBC947.08c	SPCC548.05c	hip4	dbl5	hpc2	SPCC548.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529699	2539248	2539314	275818	275880	SPCC1739.03	SPCC548.05c	hrr1	dbl5	-	SPCC548.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529700	2541650	2538841	278146	275422	SPAC14C4.12c	SPCC550.03c	laf1	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529701	2542568	2538841	279024	275422	SPAC1952.02	SPCC550.03c	tma23	SPCC550.03c	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.9246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529702	2542237	2538841	278709	275422	SPAC19E9.02	SPCC550.03c	fin1	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529703	2541786	2538841	278278	275422	SPAC22F3.08c	SPCC550.03c	rok1	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529704	2541531	2538841	278031	275422	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC550.03c	fft3	SPCC550.03c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529705	2541614	2538841	278111	275422	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC550.03c	elp3	SPCC550.03c	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529706	2542008	2538841	278491	275422	SPAC2G11.07c	SPCC550.03c	ptc3	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529707	2542192	2538841	278667	275422	SPAC9G1.12	SPCC550.03c	cpd1	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529708	2540244	2538841	276776	275422	SPBC336.01	SPCC550.03c	fbh1	SPCC550.03c	fdh|fdh1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529709	3361561	2539564	280637	276125	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC550.12	swr1	arp6	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529710	2542135	2539564	278611	276125	SPAC13A11.04c	SPCC550.12	ubp8	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529711	2542757	2539564	279207	276125	SPAC13C5.07	SPCC550.12	mre11	arp6	rad32	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529712	2542278	2539564	278747	276125	SPAC17G8.07	SPCC550.12	yaf9	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.7769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529713	2542513	2539564	278971	276125	SPAC1952.05	SPCC550.12	gcn5	arp6	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529714	2542519	2539564	278977	276125	SPAC19G12.08	SPCC550.12	scs7	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.0072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529715	2542008	2539564	278491	276125	SPAC2G11.07c	SPCC550.12	ptc3	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529716	2541710	2539564	278205	276125	SPAC343.11c	SPCC550.12	msc1	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.4078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529717	2541713	2539564	278208	276125	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC550.12	atp11	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529718	2543667	2539564	280081	276125	SPAC4H3.02c	SPCC550.12	swc3	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529719	2542891	2539564	279335	276125	SPAC6F12.12	SPCC550.12	par2	arp6	pbp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529720	2541834	2539564	278325	276125	SPAC824.08	SPCC550.12	gda1	arp6	gdp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529721	2539668	2539564	276223	276125	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC550.12	pht1	arp6	pi001	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.7361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529722	2539651	2539564	276206	276125	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC550.12	srb11	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529723	2540100	2539564	276638	276125	SPBC13E7.09	SPCC550.12	vrp1	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529724	2540787	2539564	277306	276125	SPBC1921.07c	SPCC550.12	sgf29	arp6	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529725	2540436	2539564	276964	276125	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC550.12	ngg1	arp6	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529726	2540512	2539564	277040	276125	SPBC29A3.05	SPCC550.12	vps71	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.6843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529727	2541135	2539564	277650	276125	SPBC839.03c	SPCC550.12	SPBC839.03c	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529728	2541337	2539564	277848	276125	SPBP35G2.13c	SPCC550.12	swc2	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.8219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529729	2539130	2539564	275702	276125	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC550.12	amk2	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.4563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529730	2541614	2539563	278111	276124	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC550.15c	elp3	SPCC550.15c	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529731	2541642	2539444	278138	276007	SPAC10F6.05c	SPCC576.13	ubc6	swc5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529732	3361561	2539444	280637	276007	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC576.13	swr1	swc5	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529733	2542135	2539444	278611	276007	SPAC13A11.04c	SPCC576.13	ubp8	swc5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529734	2542278	2539444	278747	276007	SPAC17G8.07	SPCC576.13	yaf9	swc5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.1939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529735	2542207	2539444	278682	276007	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC576.13	ddb1	swc5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529736	2542568	2539444	279024	276007	SPAC1952.02	SPCC576.13	tma23	swc5	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529737	2542513	2539444	278971	276007	SPAC1952.05	SPCC576.13	gcn5	swc5	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529738	2542519	2539444	278977	276007	SPAC19G12.08	SPCC576.13	scs7	swc5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529739	2541871	2539444	278361	276007	SPAC22F3.09c	SPCC576.13	res2	swc5	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529740	2542032	2539444	278514	276007	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC576.13	pnk1	swc5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529741	2541672	2539444	278168	276007	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC576.13	lsk1	swc5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529742	2542008	2539444	278491	276007	SPAC2G11.07c	SPCC576.13	ptc3	swc5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529743	2541710	2539444	278205	276007	SPAC343.11c	SPCC576.13	msc1	swc5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.5666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529744	2543384	2539444	279806	276007	SPAC637.06	SPCC576.13	gmh5	swc5	SPAC637.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529745	2541819	2539444	278310	276007	SPAC6G9.08	SPCC576.13	ubp6	swc5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529746	2543341	2539444	279764	276007	SPAC8E11.07c	SPCC576.13	alp31	swc5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529747	2541657	2539444	278153	276007	SPAP27G11.15	SPCC576.13	slx1	swc5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529748	2543372	2539444	279794	276007	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC576.13	ase1	swc5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529749	2539668	2539444	276223	276007	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC576.13	pht1	swc5	pi001	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529750	2539984	2539444	276528	276007	SPBC1289.11	SPCC576.13	spf38	swc5	cwf17	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529751	2539651	2539444	276206	276007	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC576.13	srb11	swc5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529752	2539911	2539444	276456	276007	SPBC15D4.10c	SPCC576.13	amo1	swc5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529753	2540019	2539444	276563	276007	SPBC1685.01	SPCC576.13	pmp1	swc5	dsp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529754	2540436	2539444	276964	276007	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC576.13	ngg1	swc5	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529755	2540512	2539444	277040	276007	SPBC29A3.05	SPCC576.13	vps71	swc5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.9902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529756	2541175	2539444	277689	276007	SPBC839.13c	SPCC576.13	rpl1601	swc5	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529757	2541208	2539444	277722	276007	SPBC887.04c	SPCC576.13	lub1	swc5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.0882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529758	2541337	2539444	277848	276007	SPBP35G2.13c	SPCC576.13	swc2	swc5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529759	2541373	2539444	277884	276007	SPBP8B7.18c	SPCC576.13	SPBP8B7.18c	swc5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529760	2538946	2539444	275520	276007	SPCC162.11c	SPCC576.13	SPCC162.11c	swc5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529761	2539375	2539444	275941	276007	SPCC4G3.11	SPCC576.13	mug154	swc5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529762	2539564	2539444	276125	276007	SPCC550.12	SPCC576.13	arp6	swc5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.5559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529763	2542757	2539483	279207	276046	SPAC13C5.07	SPCC584.02	mre11	cuf2	rad32	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529764	2539366	2539483	275932	276046	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC584.02	pef1	cuf2	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529765	2542318	2539023	278784	275596	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC594.05c	cph1	spf1	-	spp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.8299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529766	2542252	2539023	278722	275596	SPAC17A2.13c	SPCC594.05c	rad25	spf1	-	spp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529767	2541776	2539023	278270	275596	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC594.05c	swd1	spf1	-	spp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.5949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529768	2542701	2539023	279154	275596	SPAC26H5.05	SPCC594.05c	mga2	spf1	SPAC26H5.05	spp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529769	2539667	2539023	276222	275596	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC594.05c	ash2	spf1	-	spp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.4335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529770	2539785	2539023	276335	275596	SPBC1773.16c	SPCC594.05c	SPBC1773.16c	spf1	-	spp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529771	2540788	2539023	277307	275596	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC594.05c	swd2	spf1	swd2.1	spp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529772	2540929	2539023	277445	275596	SPBC354.03	SPCC594.05c	swd3	spf1	-	spp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.7561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529773	2541292	2539023	277804	275596	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC594.05c	sdh4	spf1	tim18	spp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529774	2543263	2538848	279691	275429	SPAC1002.15c	SPCC613.12c	med6	raf1	pmc5	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529775	2542309	2538848	278775	275429	SPAC16A10.02	SPCC613.12c	sub1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529776	2542239	2538848	278711	275429	SPAC18G6.02c	SPCC613.12c	chp1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.7829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529777	2542541	2538848	278998	275429	SPAC1B3.03c	SPCC613.12c	wis2	raf1	cyp5	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529778	2542126	2538848	278602	275429	SPAC1B3.05	SPCC613.12c	not3	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529779	2541941	2538848	278428	275429	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC613.12c	tfs1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529780	2541871	2538848	278361	275429	SPAC22F3.09c	SPCC613.12c	res2	raf1	mcs1|pct1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529781	2541789	2538848	278281	275429	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC613.12c	iwr1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529782	2542081	2538848	278558	275429	SPAC26H5.04	SPCC613.12c	SPAC26H5.04	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529783	2542516	2538848	278974	275429	SPAC2F7.04	SPCC613.12c	pmc2	raf1	med1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.7989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529784	2543164	2538848	279595	275429	SPAC3G6.06c	SPCC613.12c	rad2	raf1	fen1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529785	2543452	2538848	279872	275429	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC613.12c	ssu72	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529786	2543443	2538848	279863	275429	SPAC3H1.12c	SPCC613.12c	snt2	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529787	2543346	2538848	279768	275429	SPAC688.14	SPCC613.12c	set13	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529788	2542198	2538848	278673	275429	SPAC6F12.09	SPCC613.12c	rdp1	raf1	rdr1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.4686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529789	2542021	2538848	278504	275429	SPAP14E8.02	SPCC613.12c	tos4	raf1	SPAP14E8.02	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.3321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529790	2541470	2538848	277972	275429	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPCC613.12c	rpb9	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.3001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529791	2539999	2538848	276543	275429	SPBC1734.15	SPCC613.12c	rsc4	raf1	brd1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529792	2540306	2538848	276836	275429	SPBC2G5.02c	SPCC613.12c	ckb2	raf1	SPBC2G5.02c	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529793	2540221	2538848	276754	275429	SPBC32F12.02	SPCC613.12c	rec14	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529794	2540967	2538848	277483	275429	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC613.12c	SPBC36B7.08c	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529795	2540825	2538848	277343	275429	SPBC428.08c	SPCC613.12c	clr4	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.4135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529796	2541378	2538848	277889	275429	SPBP8B7.21	SPCC613.12c	ubp3	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529797	2539050	2538848	275623	275429	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC613.12c	rik1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.8167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529798	2538690	2538848	275275	275429	SPCC1393.05	SPCC613.12c	ers1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.0574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529799	2539249	2538848	275819	275429	SPCC1450.05c	SPCC613.12c	rox3	raf1	med19	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529800	2538930	2538848	275506	275429	SPCC188.13c	SPCC613.12c	dcr1	raf1	SPCC584.10c	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529801	2542519	2539499	278977	276062	SPAC19G12.08	SPCC622.08c	scs7	hta1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529802	2539911	2539499	276456	276062	SPBC15D4.10c	SPCC622.08c	amo1	hta1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529803	2540118	2539499	276655	276062	SPBC16E9.17c	SPCC622.08c	rem1	hta1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529804	2540244	2539499	276776	276062	SPBC336.01	SPCC622.08c	fbh1	hta1	fdh|fdh1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529805	2540995	2539499	277511	276062	SPBC337.16	SPCC622.08c	cho1	hta1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529806	2541728	2539454	278222	276017	SPAC20G4.03c	SPCC622.15c	hri1	SPCC622.15c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529807	2540317	2539454	276847	276017	SPBC24C6.05	SPCC622.15c	sec28	SPCC622.15c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.6193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529808	2542519	2539481	278977	276044	SPAC19G12.08	SPCC622.16c	scs7	epe1	-	kdm2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.1686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529809	2541633	2539481	278129	276044	SPAC664.01c	SPCC622.16c	swi6	epe1	SPAC824.10c	kdm2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529810	2542198	2539481	278673	276044	SPAC6F12.09	SPCC622.16c	rdp1	epe1	rdr1	kdm2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529811	2541819	2539481	278310	276044	SPAC6G9.08	SPCC622.16c	ubp6	epe1	-	kdm2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.07	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529812	2539911	2539481	276456	276044	SPBC15D4.10c	SPCC622.16c	amo1	epe1	-	kdm2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.8964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529813	3361342	2539481	280418	276044	SPBC16D10.07c	SPCC622.16c	sir2	epe1	-	kdm2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529814	2540317	2539481	276847	276044	SPBC24C6.05	SPCC622.16c	sec28	epe1	-	kdm2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.03	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529815	2540825	2539481	277343	276044	SPBC428.08c	SPCC622.16c	clr4	epe1	-	kdm2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529816	2541088	2539481	277603	276044	SPBC609.05	SPCC622.16c	pob3	epe1	-	kdm2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529817	2540821	2539481	277339	276044	SPBC800.03	SPCC622.16c	clr3	epe1	-	kdm2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529818	2540735	2539481	277258	276044	SPBC83.03c	SPCC622.16c	tas3	epe1	-	kdm2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529819	2541208	2539481	277722	276044	SPBC887.04c	SPCC622.16c	lub1	epe1	-	kdm2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.4525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529820	2541336	2539481	277847	276044	SPBP35G2.10	SPCC622.16c	mit1	epe1	-	kdm2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529821	2539248	2539481	275818	276044	SPCC1739.03	SPCC622.16c	hrr1	epe1	-	kdm2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529822	2538848	2539481	275429	276044	SPCC613.12c	SPCC622.16c	raf1	epe1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	kdm2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529823	2541496	2538794	277998	275375	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC622.17	arp42	apn1	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529824	2543263	2539424	279691	275989	SPAC1002.15c	SPCC622.19	med6	jmj4	pmc5	mug149	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529825	2542168	2539424	278643	275989	SPAC17A5.16	SPCC622.19	ftp105	jmj4	-	mug149	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529826	2542421	2539424	278884	275989	SPAC17G8.05	SPCC622.19	med20	jmj4	-	mug149	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529827	2540317	2539424	276847	275989	SPBC24C6.05	SPCC622.19	sec28	jmj4	-	mug149	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529828	2540320	2539424	276850	275989	SPBC3D6.04c	SPCC622.19	mad1	jmj4	-	mug149	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529829	3361391	2539568	280467	276128	SPAC13G6.01c	SPCC663.05c	rad8	cia1	SPAC5H10.14c	asf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529830	3361506	2539568	280582	276128	SPAC17G8.09	SPCC663.05c	shg1	cia1	-	asf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529831	2543118	2539568	279550	276128	SPAC3G6.11	SPCC663.05c	chl1	cia1	-	asf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529832	2543341	2539568	279764	276128	SPAC8E11.07c	SPCC663.05c	alp31	cia1	-	asf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529833	2540100	2539568	276638	276128	SPBC13E7.09	SPCC663.05c	vrp1	cia1	-	asf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529834	2539999	2539568	276543	276128	SPBC1734.15	SPCC663.05c	rsc4	cia1	brd1	asf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529835	2540907	2539568	277423	276128	SPBC582.10c	SPCC663.05c	SPBC582.10c	cia1	-	asf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529836	2541536	2539423	278036	275988	SPAC1071.02	SPCC663.12	mms19	cid12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529837	2541628	2539423	278124	275988	SPAC110.02	SPCC663.12	pds5	cid12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.7788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529838	2542349	2539423	278814	275988	SPAC1782.05	SPCC663.12	ypa2	cid12	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.7934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529839	2542421	2539423	278884	275988	SPAC17G8.05	SPCC663.12	med20	cid12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.8275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529840	2542278	2539423	278747	275988	SPAC17G8.07	SPCC663.12	yaf9	cid12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529841	2542032	2539423	278514	275988	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC663.12	pnk1	cid12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529842	2542081	2539423	278558	275988	SPAC26H5.04	SPCC663.12	SPAC26H5.04	cid12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529843	2541479	2539423	277981	275988	SPAC27F1.06c	SPCC663.12	SPAC27F1.06c	cid12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529844	2541614	2539423	278111	275988	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC663.12	elp3	cid12	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.0075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529845	2543190	2539423	279619	275988	SPAC31F12.01	SPCC663.12	zds1	cid12	SPAC637.14|mug88	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529846	2543384	2539423	279806	275988	SPAC637.06	SPCC663.12	gmh5	cid12	SPAC637.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529847	2543670	2539423	280084	275988	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPCC663.12	eme1	cid12	mms4|slx2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529848	2539971	2539423	276515	275988	SPBC1105.04c	SPCC663.12	cbp1	cid12	abp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.3486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529849	2539911	2539423	276456	275988	SPBC15D4.10c	SPCC663.12	amo1	cid12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.6377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529850	2539700	2539423	276253	275988	SPBC1685.15c	SPCC663.12	klp6	cid12	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.6855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529851	2540317	2539423	276847	275988	SPBC24C6.05	SPCC663.12	sec28	cid12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529852	2540907	2539423	277423	275988	SPBC582.10c	SPCC663.12	SPBC582.10c	cid12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529853	2541147	2539423	277662	275988	SPBC651.05c	SPCC663.12	dot2	cid12	vps22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529854	2538690	2539423	275275	275988	SPCC1393.05	SPCC663.12	ers1	cid12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529855	2543263	2539403	279691	275968	SPAC1002.15c	SPCC736.11	med6	ago1	pmc5	csp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.5196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529856	2541536	2539403	278036	275968	SPAC1071.02	SPCC736.11	mms19	ago1	-	csp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.5146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529857	2542421	2539403	278884	275968	SPAC17G8.05	SPCC736.11	med20	ago1	-	csp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.5915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529858	2542239	2539403	278711	275968	SPAC18G6.02c	SPCC736.11	chp1	ago1	-	csp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.6257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529859	2542459	2539403	278920	275968	SPAC1D4.03c	SPCC736.11	aut12	ago1	-	csp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529860	2542516	2539403	278974	275968	SPAC2F7.04	SPCC736.11	pmc2	ago1	med1	csp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529861	2541633	2539403	278129	275968	SPAC664.01c	SPCC736.11	swi6	ago1	SPAC824.10c	csp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529862	2542021	2539403	278504	275968	SPAP14E8.02	SPCC736.11	tos4	ago1	SPAP14E8.02	csp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529863	2543565	2539403	279981	275968	SPAPB24D3.04c	SPCC736.11	mag1	ago1	-	csp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529864	2541470	2539403	277972	275968	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPCC736.11	rpb9	ago1	-	csp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.9382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529865	2539920	2539403	276464	275968	SPBC119.08	SPCC736.11	pmk1	ago1	spm1	csp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529866	2539726	2539403	276278	275968	SPBC13E7.08c	SPCC736.11	leo1	ago1	SPBC13E7.08c	csp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529867	2539700	2539403	276253	275968	SPBC1685.15c	SPCC736.11	klp6	ago1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	csp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.0269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529868	2540154	2539403	276690	275968	SPBC16C6.05	SPCC736.11	SPBC16C6.05	ago1	-	csp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529869	2540077	2539403	276615	275968	SPBC17D11.04c	SPCC736.11	nto1	ago1	-	csp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.5337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529870	2540337	2539403	276866	275968	SPBC28F2.11	SPCC736.11	hmo1	ago1	SPBC28F2.11	csp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.0977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529871	2540346	2539403	276875	275968	SPBC2F12.03c	SPCC736.11	ebs1	ago1	SPBC2F12.03c	csp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529872	2540967	2539403	277483	275968	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC736.11	SPBC36B7.08c	ago1	-	csp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529873	2540825	2539403	277343	275968	SPBC428.08c	SPCC736.11	clr4	ago1	-	csp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.0336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529874	2541147	2539403	277662	275968	SPBC651.05c	SPCC736.11	dot2	ago1	vps22	csp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529875	2541336	2539403	277847	275968	SPBP35G2.10	SPCC736.11	mit1	ago1	-	csp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.6405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529876	2539050	2539403	275623	275968	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC736.11	rik1	ago1	-	csp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529877	2539066	2539403	275638	275968	SPCC126.13c	SPCC736.11	SPCC126.13c	ago1	-	csp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.4217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529878	2539249	2539403	275819	275968	SPCC1450.05c	SPCC736.11	rox3	ago1	med19	csp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.3109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529879	2539481	2539403	276044	275968	SPCC622.16c	SPCC736.11	epe1	ago1	kdm2	csp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.8071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529880	2543670	2539412	280084	275977	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPCC737.07c	eme1	SPCC737.07c	mms4|slx2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529881	2542513	2539434	278971	275997	SPAC1952.05	SPCC757.09c	gcn5	rnc1	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529882	2542519	2539434	278977	275997	SPAC19G12.08	SPCC757.09c	scs7	rnc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.7136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529883	2543064	2539434	279497	275997	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC757.09c	hrp3	rnc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529884	2539058	2539434	275631	275997	SPCC126.07c	SPCC757.09c	pbr1	rnc1	SPCC126.07c|asr1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529885	3361401	2539291	280477	275859	SPAC1093.03	SPCC757.10	SPAC1093.03	vph2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.6731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529886	2541642	2539291	278138	275859	SPAC10F6.05c	SPCC757.10	ubc6	vph2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529887	2542363	2539291	278827	275859	SPAC1783.05	SPCC757.10	hrp1	vph2	chd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529888	2542168	2539291	278643	275859	SPAC17A5.16	SPCC757.10	ftp105	vph2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529889	2542418	2539291	278881	275859	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC757.10	dad2	vph2	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529890	2541871	2539291	278361	275859	SPAC22F3.09c	SPCC757.10	res2	vph2	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.4336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529891	2541979	2539291	278464	275859	SPAC23A1.07	SPCC757.10	SPAC23A1.07	vph2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529892	2542032	2539291	278514	275859	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC757.10	pnk1	vph2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529893	2542008	2539291	278491	275859	SPAC2G11.07c	SPCC757.10	ptc3	vph2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529894	2543101	2539291	279533	275859	SPAC323.03c	SPCC757.10	SPAC323.03c	vph2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529895	2542571	2539291	279027	275859	SPAC589.02c	SPCC757.10	med13	vph2	spTrap240|srb9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.6076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529896	2543563	2539291	279979	275859	SPAC664.02c	SPCC757.10	arp8	vph2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529897	2543226	2539291	279654	275859	SPAC6B12.05c	SPCC757.10	ies2	vph2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529898	2542021	2539291	278504	275859	SPAP14E8.02	SPCC757.10	tos4	vph2	SPAP14E8.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529899	2541657	2539291	278153	275859	SPAP27G11.15	SPCC757.10	slx1	vph2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529900	2539651	2539291	276206	275859	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC757.10	srb11	vph2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.5022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529901	2539956	2539291	276500	275859	SPBC16E9.11c	SPCC757.10	pub3	vph2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529902	2539733	2539291	276285	275859	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC757.10	pab2	vph2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529903	2539714	2539291	276267	275859	SPBC1861.07	SPCC757.10	SPBC1861.07	vph2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529904	2540686	2539291	277211	275859	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC757.10	bdc1	vph2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.6095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529905	2540498	2539291	277026	275859	SPBC27.02c	SPCC757.10	ask1	vph2	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.8383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529906	2540679	2539291	277204	275859	SPBC3D6.10	SPCC757.10	apn2	vph2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.4607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529907	2541284	2539291	277797	275859	SPBC947.08c	SPCC757.10	hip4	vph2	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.0321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529908	2541292	2539291	277804	275859	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC757.10	sdh4	vph2	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529909	2541378	2539291	277889	275859	SPBP8B7.21	SPCC757.10	ubp3	vph2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529910	2539249	2539291	275819	275859	SPCC1450.05c	SPCC757.10	rox3	vph2	med19	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529911	2539366	2539291	275932	275859	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC757.10	pef1	vph2	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529912	3361561	2538986	280637	275560	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC895.06	swr1	elp2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529913	2542135	2538986	278611	275560	SPAC13A11.04c	SPCC895.06	ubp8	elp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.2967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529914	2542757	2538986	279207	275560	SPAC13C5.07	SPCC895.06	mre11	elp2	rad32	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529915	2542277	2538986	278746	275560	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC895.06	dbr1	elp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529916	2542418	2538986	278881	275560	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC895.06	dad2	elp2	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.8088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529917	2542513	2538986	278971	275560	SPAC1952.05	SPCC895.06	gcn5	elp2	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.5141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529918	2542522	2538986	278980	275560	SPAC19A8.03	SPCC895.06	ymr1	elp2	SPAC19A8.03	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529919	2542126	2538986	278602	275560	SPAC1B3.05	SPCC895.06	not3	elp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529920	2541776	2538986	278270	275560	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC895.06	swd1	elp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529921	2541614	2538986	278111	275560	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC895.06	elp3	elp2	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.7686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529922	2542516	2538986	278974	275560	SPAC2F7.04	SPCC895.06	pmc2	elp2	med1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529923	2543106	2538986	279538	275560	SPAC3A11.13	SPCC895.06	SPAC3A11.13	elp2	SPAC3H5.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529924	2543592	2538986	280007	275560	SPAC4F10.18	SPCC895.06	nup37	elp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529925	2543426	2538986	279846	275560	SPAC631.02	SPCC895.06	bdf2	elp2	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529926	2543384	2538986	279806	275560	SPAC637.06	SPCC895.06	gmh5	elp2	SPAC637.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529927	2543670	2538986	280084	275560	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPCC895.06	eme1	elp2	mms4|slx2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529928	2539971	2538986	276515	275560	SPBC1105.04c	SPCC895.06	cbp1	elp2	abp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529929	2539604	2538986	276162	275560	SPBC1105.14	SPCC895.06	rsv2	elp2	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529930	2539812	2538986	276362	275560	SPBC1347.02	SPCC895.06	fkbp39	elp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.7728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529931	2539726	2538986	276278	275560	SPBC13E7.08c	SPCC895.06	leo1	elp2	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529932	2539956	2538986	276500	275560	SPBC16E9.11c	SPCC895.06	pub3	elp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529933	2540077	2538986	276615	275560	SPBC17D11.04c	SPCC895.06	nto1	elp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529934	2540787	2538986	277306	275560	SPBC1921.07c	SPCC895.06	sgf29	elp2	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.3016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529935	2540436	2538986	276964	275560	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC895.06	ngg1	elp2	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529936	2540597	2538986	277123	275560	SPBC29A3.09c	SPCC895.06	SPBC29A3.09c	elp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529937	2540396	2538986	276924	275560	SPBC31F10.12	SPCC895.06	tma20	elp2	SPBC31F10.12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529938	2541017	2538986	277532	275560	SPBC36.07	SPCC895.06	elp1	elp2	iki3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.9984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529939	2540979	2538986	277495	275560	SPBC3H7.10	SPCC895.06	elp6	elp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.9293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529940	2539847	2538986	276395	275560	SPBC530.14c	SPCC895.06	dsk1	elp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529941	2541292	2538986	277804	275560	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC895.06	sdh4	elp2	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529942	2541378	2538986	277889	275560	SPBP8B7.21	SPCC895.06	ubp3	elp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.6932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529943	2539249	2538986	275819	275560	SPCC1450.05c	SPCC895.06	rox3	elp2	med19	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529944	2539041	2538986	275614	275560	SPCC18.06c	SPCC895.06	caf1	elp2	pop2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.4716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529945	2539136	2538986	275708	275560	SPCC1919.05	SPCC895.06	SPCC1919.05	elp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529946	2538778	2538986	275359	275560	SPCC4G3.15c	SPCC895.06	not2	elp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529947	2539130	2539497	275702	276060	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC895.07	amk2	alp14	-	mtc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529948	2543263	2539420	279691	275985	SPAC1002.15c	SPCC970.07c	med6	raf2	pmc5	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.4045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529949	2542421	2539420	278884	275985	SPAC17G8.05	SPCC970.07c	med20	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529950	2542239	2539420	278711	275985	SPAC18G6.02c	SPCC970.07c	chp1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.1368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529951	2542541	2539420	278998	275985	SPAC1B3.03c	SPCC970.07c	wis2	raf2	cyp5	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529952	2541941	2539420	278428	275985	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC970.07c	tfs1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529953	2541979	2539420	278464	275985	SPAC23A1.07	SPCC970.07c	SPAC23A1.07	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529954	2542516	2539420	278974	275985	SPAC2F7.04	SPCC970.07c	pmc2	raf2	med1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.5871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529955	2542008	2539420	278491	275985	SPAC2G11.07c	SPCC970.07c	ptc3	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529956	2542198	2539420	278673	275985	SPAC6F12.09	SPCC970.07c	rdp1	raf2	rdr1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.2286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529957	2541470	2539420	277972	275985	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPCC970.07c	rpb9	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529958	2540825	2539420	277343	275985	SPBC428.08c	SPCC970.07c	clr4	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529959	2540735	2539420	277258	275985	SPBC83.03c	SPCC970.07c	tas3	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.9999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529960	2541378	2539420	277889	275985	SPBP8B7.21	SPCC970.07c	ubp3	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529961	2539050	2539420	275623	275985	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC970.07c	rik1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.5816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529962	2539249	2539420	275819	275985	SPCC1450.05c	SPCC970.07c	rox3	raf2	med19	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529963	2539248	2539420	275818	275985	SPCC1739.03	SPCC970.07c	hrr1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.8489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529964	2538930	2539420	275506	275985	SPCC188.13c	SPCC970.07c	dcr1	raf2	SPCC584.10c	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.8174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529965	2539481	2539420	276044	275985	SPCC622.16c	SPCC970.07c	epe1	raf2	kdm2	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529966	2539423	2539420	275988	275985	SPCC663.12	SPCC970.07c	cid12	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.3576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529967	2543529	2539473	279947	276036	SPAC4C5.02c	SPCP25A2.02c	ryh1	rhp26	hos1|sat7	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529968	2543384	2539441	279806	276004	SPAC637.06	SPCPJ732.02c	gmh5	xks1	SPAC637.06	SPCPJ732.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529969	2540320	2539441	276850	276004	SPBC3D6.04c	SPCPJ732.02c	mad1	xks1	-	SPCPJ732.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
529970	2538955	2539441	275529	276004	SPCC1450.02	SPCPJ732.02c	bdf1	xks1	SPCC191.13|brf1	SPCPJ732.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Roguev A (2008)	18818364	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
530571	2539438	2541179	276001	277693	SPCC4B3.07	SPBC6B1.08c	nro1	ofd1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Yeh TL (2011)	21481773	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
530572	2541179	2539438	277693	276001	SPBC6B1.08c	SPCC4B3.07	ofd1	nro1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yeh TL (2011)	21481773	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
530573	2541179	2539438	277693	276001	SPBC6B1.08c	SPCC4B3.07	ofd1	nro1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Yeh TL (2011)	21481773	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531088	2541699	2539205	278195	275775	SPAP8A3.08	SPCC4B3.15	cdc4	mid1	-	dmf1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Laporte D (2011)	21422229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531089	2543129	2539205	279561	275775	SPAC4F8.13c	SPCC4B3.15	rng2	mid1	-	dmf1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Laporte D (2011)	21422229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531090	2539513	2539205	276075	275775	SPCC645.05c	SPCC4B3.15	myo2	mid1	rng5	dmf1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Laporte D (2011)	21422229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531091	2541699	2539513	278195	276075	SPAP8A3.08	SPCC645.05c	cdc4	myo2	-	rng5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Laporte D (2011)	21422229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531092	2543129	2539513	279561	276075	SPAC4F8.13c	SPCC645.05c	rng2	myo2	-	rng5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Laporte D (2011)	21422229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531093	2541975	2539205	278460	275775	SPAC20G8.05c	SPCC4B3.15	cdc15	mid1	-	dmf1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Laporte D (2011)	21422229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531094	2543129	2541699	279561	278195	SPAC4F8.13c	SPAP8A3.08	rng2	cdc4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Laporte D (2011)	21422229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531095	2541975	2539205	278460	275775	SPAC20G8.05c	SPCC4B3.15	cdc15	mid1	-	dmf1	Two-hybrid	physical	Laporte D (2011)	21422229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531096	2541975	2541975	278460	278460	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC20G8.05c	cdc15	cdc15	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Laporte D (2011)	21422229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531101	3361327	2542304	280403	278771	SPBC21.01	SPAC1687.20c	mis17	mis6	SPBC776.19	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531102	3361327	2542737	280403	279187	SPBC21.01	SPAC25B8.14	mis17	mal2	SPBC776.19	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531103	3361327	2539115	280403	275687	SPBC21.01	SPCC1235.07	mis17	fta7	SPBC776.19	cnl3|sma7	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531104	3361327	2541321	280403	277833	SPBC21.01	SPBP22H7.09c	mis17	mis15	SPBC776.19	pi022|SPACTOKYO_453.12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531105	3361327	2542367	280403	278831	SPBC21.01	SPAC1783.03	mis17	fta2	SPBC776.19	sma2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531106	3361327	2538719	280403	275303	SPBC21.01	SPCC1393.04	mis17	fta4	SPBC776.19	sma4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531107	3361327	2540804	280403	277323	SPBC21.01	SPBC18E5.03c	mis17	sim4	SPBC776.19	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531108	3361327	2543650	280403	280064	SPBC21.01	SPAC4F10.12	mis17	fta1	SPBC776.19	sma1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531109	3361327	2541788	280403	278280	SPBC21.01	SPAC23H4.11c	mis17	cnl2	SPBC776.19	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531110	3361327	2540439	280403	276967	SPBC21.01	SPBC31F10.06c	mis17	sar1	SPBC776.19	psr1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531111	3361327	2541342	280403	277853	SPBC21.01	SPBP8B7.12c	mis17	fta3	SPBC776.19	sma3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531112	3361327	2542441	280403	278903	SPBC21.01	SPAC17C9.06	mis17	sam50	SPBC776.19	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531113	3361327	2542646	280403	279100	SPBC21.01	SPAC11H11.05c	mis17	fta6	SPBC776.19	sma6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531114	3361327	2542256	280403	278726	SPBC21.01	SPAC29A4.08c	mis17	prp19	SPBC776.19	cwf8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531115	3361327	2540494	280403	277022	SPBC21.01	SPBC409.04c	mis17	mis12	SPBC776.19	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531116	3361327	2542311	280403	278777	SPBC21.01	SPAC16A10.05c	mis17	dad1	SPBC776.19	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531117	2542304	2542737	278771	279187	SPAC1687.20c	SPAC25B8.14	mis6	mal2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531118	2542304	3361327	278771	280403	SPAC1687.20c	SPBC21.01	mis6	mis17	-	SPBC776.19	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531119	2542304	2539115	278771	275687	SPAC1687.20c	SPCC1235.07	mis6	fta7	-	cnl3|sma7	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531120	2542304	2541321	278771	277833	SPAC1687.20c	SPBP22H7.09c	mis6	mis15	-	pi022|SPACTOKYO_453.12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531121	2542304	2542367	278771	278831	SPAC1687.20c	SPAC1783.03	mis6	fta2	-	sma2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531122	2542304	2538719	278771	275303	SPAC1687.20c	SPCC1393.04	mis6	fta4	-	sma4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531123	2542304	2540804	278771	277323	SPAC1687.20c	SPBC18E5.03c	mis6	sim4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531124	2542304	2543650	278771	280064	SPAC1687.20c	SPAC4F10.12	mis6	fta1	-	sma1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531125	2542304	2541788	278771	278280	SPAC1687.20c	SPAC23H4.11c	mis6	cnl2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531126	2542304	2540439	278771	276967	SPAC1687.20c	SPBC31F10.06c	mis6	sar1	-	psr1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531127	2542304	2541342	278771	277853	SPAC1687.20c	SPBP8B7.12c	mis6	fta3	-	sma3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531128	2542304	2542441	278771	278903	SPAC1687.20c	SPAC17C9.06	mis6	sam50	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531129	2542304	2542646	278771	279100	SPAC1687.20c	SPAC11H11.05c	mis6	fta6	-	sma6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531130	2542304	2542256	278771	278726	SPAC1687.20c	SPAC29A4.08c	mis6	prp19	-	cwf8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531131	2542304	2540494	278771	277022	SPAC1687.20c	SPBC409.04c	mis6	mis12	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531132	2542304	2542311	278771	278777	SPAC1687.20c	SPAC16A10.05c	mis6	dad1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531133	2542304	2540097	278771	276635	SPAC1687.20c	SPBC11C11.03	mis6	ndc80	-	ndc10|tid3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531134	2540494	2540097	277022	276635	SPBC409.04c	SPBC11C11.03	mis12	ndc80	-	ndc10|tid3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531135	2540494	2542367	277022	278831	SPBC409.04c	SPAC1783.03	mis12	fta2	-	sma2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531136	2540494	2542304	277022	278771	SPBC409.04c	SPAC1687.20c	mis12	mis6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531137	2540494	3361327	277022	280403	SPBC409.04c	SPBC21.01	mis12	mis17	-	SPBC776.19	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531138	2540494	2542311	277022	278777	SPBC409.04c	SPAC16A10.05c	mis12	dad1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531139	2540494	2540439	277022	276967	SPBC409.04c	SPBC31F10.06c	mis12	sar1	-	psr1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531140	2540494	2542256	277022	278726	SPBC409.04c	SPAC29A4.08c	mis12	prp19	-	cwf8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531141	2540494	2541321	277022	277833	SPBC409.04c	SPBP22H7.09c	mis12	mis15	-	pi022|SPACTOKYO_453.12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531142	2540494	2539115	277022	275687	SPBC409.04c	SPCC1235.07	mis12	fta7	-	cnl3|sma7	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531143	2540494	2542646	277022	279100	SPBC409.04c	SPAC11H11.05c	mis12	fta6	-	sma6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531144	2540494	2538719	277022	275303	SPBC409.04c	SPCC1393.04	mis12	fta4	-	sma4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531145	3361327	2539109	280403	275681	SPBC21.01	SPCC74.03c	mis17	ssp2	SPBC776.19	ucp9	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
531146	3361327	2541773	280403	278267	SPBC21.01	SPAC23H4.02	mis17	ppk9	SPBC776.19	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
531147	3361327	2542228	280403	278701	SPBC21.01	SPAC823.03	mis17	ppk15	SPBC776.19	SPAC1E11.03	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
531148	3361327	2541109	280403	277624	SPBC21.01	SPBC6B1.02	mis17	ppk30	SPBC776.19	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
531149	3361327	2541672	280403	278168	SPBC21.01	SPAC2F3.15	mis17	lsk1	SPBC776.19	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
531150	3361327	2542873	280403	279318	SPBC21.01	SPAC9G1.02	mis17	wis4	SPBC776.19	wak1|wik1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Shiroiwa Y (2011)	21445296	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
531151	2541251	2539186	277765	275757	SPBC947.10	SPCC16C4.13c	dsc1	rpl1201	-	rpl12-1|rpl12.1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531152	2541251	2539010	277765	275583	SPBC947.10	SPCC31H12.04c	dsc1	rpl1202	-	rpl12|rpl12-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531153	2541251	2543021	277765	279457	SPBC947.10	SPAC11E3.15	dsc1	rpl22	-	SPAP8A3.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531154	2541251	2539743	277765	276295	SPBC947.10	SPBC16A3.08c	dsc1	oga1	-	SPBC16A3.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531155	2541251	2539308	277765	275875	SPBC947.10	SPCC613.05c	dsc1	rpl35	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531156	2541251	2539035	277765	275608	SPBC947.10	SPCC794.09c	dsc1	tef101	-	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531157	2541251	2541984	277765	278469	SPBC947.10	SPAC23A1.10	dsc1	tef102	-	ef1a-b|ef1a-d|efa1|SPBC24E9.15c|tef1-b|tef1-d	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531158	2541251	2539917	277765	276461	SPBC947.10	SPBC839.15c	dsc1	tef103	-	ef1a-c|ef1-b|efa13	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531159	2541251	2543557	277765	279974	SPBC947.10	SPAC4H3.10c	dsc1	pyk1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531160	2541251	2542108	277765	278584	SPBC947.10	SPAC6F6.07c	dsc1	rps13	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531161	2541251	2541737	277765	278231	SPBC947.10	SPAC22H12.04c	dsc1	rps102	-	rps1-2|rps3a-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531162	2541251	2540547	277765	277074	SPBC947.10	SPBC32F12.11	dsc1	tdh1	-	gpd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531163	2541251	2542884	277765	279329	SPBC947.10	SPAC1486.02c	dsc1	dsc2	-	ucp14	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531164	2541251	2540199	277765	276732	SPBC947.10	SPBC1709.05	dsc1	sks2	-	hsc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531165	2541251	2541591	277765	278088	SPBC947.10	SPAC26A3.07c	dsc1	rpl1101	-	rpl11|rpl11-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531166	2541251	2539846	277765	276394	SPBC947.10	SPBC17G9.10	dsc1	rpl1102	-	rpl11-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531167	2541251	2538893	277765	275471	SPBC947.10	SPCC18.14c	dsc1	rpp0	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531168	2541251	2542725	277765	279176	SPBC947.10	SPAC3A12.10	dsc1	rpl2001	-	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531169	2541251	2542093	277765	278570	SPBC947.10	SPAC26A3.04	dsc1	rpl2002	-	rpl20|rpl20-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531170	2541251	2541990	277765	278474	SPBC947.10	SPAC20H4.02	dsc1	dsc3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531171	2541251	2539372	277765	275938	SPBC947.10	SPCC622.18	dsc1	rpl6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531172	2541251	2540517	277765	277045	SPBC947.10	SPBC29A3.04	dsc1	rpl8	-	rpl701|rpl7a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531173	2541251	2540841	277765	277358	SPBC947.10	SPBC18H10.12c	dsc1	rpl701	-	rpl7|rpl7-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531174	2541251	2542553	277765	279010	SPBC947.10	SPAC18G6.14c	dsc1	rps7	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531175	2541251	2541344	277765	277855	SPBC947.10	SPBP8B7.03c	dsc1	rpl402	-	rpl4|rpl4-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531176	2541251	2542626	277765	279080	SPBC947.10	SPAC24H6.08	dsc1	SPAC24H6.08	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531177	2541251	2539067	277765	275639	SPBC947.10	SPCC576.08c	dsc1	rps2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531178	2541251	2539260	277765	275830	SPBC947.10	SPCC285.11	dsc1	dsc5	-	ucp10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531179	2541251	2539225	277765	275795	SPBC947.10	SPCC1739.13	dsc1	ssa2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531180	2541251	2542156	277765	278632	SPBC947.10	SPAC57A7.07c	dsc1	SPAC57A7.07c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531181	2541251	2542830	277765	279277	SPBC947.10	SPAC57A10.08c	dsc1	SPAC57A10.08c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531182	2541251	2540487	277765	277015	SPBC947.10	SPBC23G7.12c	dsc1	rpt6	-	let1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531183	2540667	2540392	277192	276920	SPBC211.06	SPBC365.15	gfh1	alp4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Anders A (2011)	21444751	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531184	2543117	2540392	279549	276920	SPAC806.08c	SPBC365.15	mod21	alp4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Anders A (2011)	21444751	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531185	2539309	2540392	275876	276920	SPCC4G3.19	SPBC365.15	alp16	alp4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Anders A (2011)	21444751	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531189	2542884	2541251	279329	277765	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC947.10	dsc2	dsc1	ucp14	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531190	2542884	2541990	279329	278474	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC20H4.02	dsc2	dsc3	ucp14	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531191	2542884	2543396	279329	279818	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC4D7.11	dsc2	dsc4	ucp14	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531192	2542884	2541251	279329	277765	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC947.10	dsc2	dsc1	ucp14	-	Co-purification	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531193	2542884	2541990	279329	278474	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC20H4.02	dsc2	dsc3	ucp14	-	Co-purification	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531194	2542884	2543396	279329	279818	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC4D7.11	dsc2	dsc4	ucp14	-	Co-purification	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531202	2542884	2541044	279329	277559	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC354.05c	dsc2	sre2	ucp14	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531863	2540825	2540565	277343	277092	SPBC428.08c	SPBC1D7.04	clr4	mlo3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531864	2540565	2540825	277092	277343	SPBC1D7.04	SPBC428.08c	mlo3	clr4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531865	2540565	2539050	277092	275623	SPBC1D7.04	SPCC11E10.08	mlo3	rik1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531866	2540565	2540825	277092	277343	SPBC1D7.04	SPBC428.08c	mlo3	clr4	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531867	2540565	2542239	277092	278711	SPBC1D7.04	SPAC18G6.02c	mlo3	chp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	requires clr4	-	BIOGRID
531868	2540825	2540565	277343	277092	SPBC428.08c	SPBC1D7.04	clr4	mlo3	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Methylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531870	2540565	2541349	277092	277860	SPBC1D7.04	SPBP35G2.08c	mlo3	air1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531871	2540565	2540268	277092	276799	SPBC1D7.04	SPBC800.06	mlo3	brx1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531872	2540565	2538926	277092	275502	SPBC1D7.04	SPCC306.07c	mlo3	SPCC306.07c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531873	2540565	2543438	277092	279858	SPBC1D7.04	SPAC8F11.04	mlo3	SPAC8F11.04	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531874	2540565	3361384	277092	280460	SPBC1D7.04	SPAC12G12.13c	mlo3	cid14	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531875	2540565	2538689	277092	275274	SPBC1D7.04	SPCC1795.11	mlo3	sum3	-	ded1|moc2|slh3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531876	2540565	2542121	277092	278597	SPBC1D7.04	SPAC17H9.05	mlo3	ebp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531877	2540565	2542204	277092	278679	SPBC1D7.04	SPAC17A5.14	mlo3	exo2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531878	2540565	2540705	277092	277228	SPBC1D7.04	SPBC20F10.01	mlo3	gar1	-	SPBC25H2.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531879	2540565	2540303	277092	276833	SPBC1D7.04	SPBC354.01	mlo3	gtp1	-	SPBC649.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531880	2540565	2541668	277092	278164	SPBC1D7.04	SPAC1F7.02c	mlo3	has1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531881	2540565	2541944	277092	278431	SPBC1D7.04	SPAC222.06	mlo3	mak16	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531882	2540565	2541639	277092	278135	SPBC1D7.04	SPAC6F12.16c	mlo3	mtr4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531883	2540565	2543648	277092	280062	SPBC1D7.04	SPAC4F10.09c	mlo3	SPAC4F10.09c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531884	2540565	2542666	277092	279119	SPBC1D7.04	SPAC1142.04	mlo3	SPAC1142.04	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531885	2540565	2541126	277092	277641	SPBC1D7.04	SPBC651.01c	mlo3	nog1	-	SPBC725.18c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531886	2540565	2542314	277092	278780	SPBC1D7.04	SPAC16E8.06c	mlo3	nop12	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531887	2540565	2541297	277092	277809	SPBC1D7.04	SPBC9B6.07	mlo3	nop52	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531888	2540565	2541814	277092	278305	SPBC1D7.04	SPAC23G3.06	mlo3	SPAC23G3.06	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531889	2540565	2540659	277092	277184	SPBC1D7.04	SPBC19F5.05c	mlo3	ppp1	-	SPBC25D12.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531890	2540565	2538971	277092	275545	SPBC1D7.04	SPCC1322.10	mlo3	SPCC1322.10	-	pwp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531891	2540565	2542965	277092	279405	SPBC1D7.04	SPAC3G6.04	mlo3	rnp24	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531892	2540565	2543500	277092	279918	SPBC1D7.04	SPAC926.08c	mlo3	SPAC926.08c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531893	2540565	2540324	277092	276854	SPBC1D7.04	SPBC29A3.16	mlo3	rrs1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531894	2540565	2539387	277092	275952	SPBC1D7.04	SPCC1840.03	mlo3	sal3	-	pse1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531895	2540565	2541530	277092	278030	SPBC1D7.04	SPAC57A10.10c	mlo3	sla1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531896	2540565	2541654	277092	278150	SPBC1D7.04	SPAC22G7.05	mlo3	kri1	-	SPAC22G7.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531897	2540565	2540888	277092	277405	SPBC1D7.04	SPBC4F6.13c	mlo3	SPBC4F6.13c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531898	2540565	2540871	277092	277388	SPBC1D7.04	SPBC4F6.14	mlo3	SPBC4F6.14	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531899	2540565	2539056	277092	275629	SPBC1D7.04	SPCC126.11c	mlo3	SPCC126.11c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531900	2540565	2539386	277092	275951	SPBC1D7.04	SPCC16C4.16c	mlo3	SPCC16C4.16c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531901	2540565	2538833	277092	275414	SPBC1D7.04	SPCP1E11.11	mlo3	puf6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531902	2540565	2542772	277092	279221	SPBC1D7.04	SPAC16.02c	mlo3	srp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531903	2540565	2542327	277092	278793	SPBC1D7.04	SPAC16C9.06c	mlo3	upf1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531904	2540565	2539299	277092	275867	SPBC1D7.04	SPCC1672.07	mlo3	SPCC1672.07	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531905	2540565	2539158	277092	275730	SPBC1D7.04	SPCC18.12c	mlo3	utp23	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531906	3361384	2542977	280460	279415	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC1093.04c	cid14	SPAC1093.04c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531907	3361384	2542665	280460	279118	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC10F6.08c	cid14	nht10	-	nht1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531908	3361384	2543438	280460	279858	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC8F11.04	cid14	SPAC8F11.04	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531909	3361384	2542112	280460	278588	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC1687.11	cid14	spb1	-	pmt2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531910	3361384	2539743	280460	276295	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC16A3.08c	cid14	oga1	-	SPBC16A3.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531911	3361384	2540078	280460	276616	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC16H5.08c	cid14	SPBC16H5.08c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531912	3361384	2540086	280460	276624	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC16H5.12c	cid14	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531913	3361384	2540924	280460	277440	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC365.04c	cid14	SPBC365.04c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531914	3361384	2540888	280460	277405	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC4F6.13c	cid14	SPBC4F6.13c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531915	3361384	2540871	280460	277388	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC4F6.14	cid14	SPBC4F6.14	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531916	3361384	2539056	280460	275629	SPAC12G12.13c	SPCC126.11c	cid14	SPCC126.11c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531917	3361384	2539540	280460	276102	SPAC12G12.13c	SPCC736.12c	cid14	mmi1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531918	3361384	2541349	280460	277860	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBP35G2.08c	cid14	air1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531919	3361384	2540268	280460	276799	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC800.06	cid14	brx1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531920	3361384	2541383	280460	277894	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBP8B7.16c	cid14	dbp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531921	3361384	2542121	280460	278597	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC17H9.05	cid14	ebp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531922	3361384	2539786	280460	276336	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC12C2.13c	cid14	fnx1	-	SPBC21D10.04c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531923	3361384	2540705	280460	277228	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC20F10.01	cid14	gar1	-	SPBC25H2.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531924	3361384	2540469	280460	276997	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC26H8.08c	cid14	grn1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531925	3361384	2540565	280460	277092	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC1D7.04	cid14	mlo3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531926	3361384	2541639	280460	278135	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC6F12.16c	cid14	mtr4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531927	3361384	2541126	280460	277641	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC651.01c	cid14	nog1	-	SPBC725.18c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531928	3361384	2542314	280460	278780	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC16E8.06c	cid14	nop12	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531929	3361384	2541773	280460	278267	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC23H4.02	cid14	ppk9	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531930	3361384	2542618	280460	279072	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC1952.15c	cid14	rec24	-	mug6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531931	3361384	2542965	280460	279405	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC3G6.04	cid14	rnp24	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531932	3361384	2540324	280460	276854	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC29A3.16	cid14	rrs1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531933	3361384	2540528	280460	277056	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC18H10.04c	cid14	sce3	-	tif48	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531934	3361384	2539061	280460	275633	SPAC12G12.13c	SPCC126.15c	cid14	sec65	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531935	3361384	2541530	280460	278030	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC57A10.10c	cid14	sla1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531936	3361384	2542772	280460	279221	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC16.02c	cid14	srp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531937	3361384	2543537	280460	279954	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC4D7.05	cid14	sum1	-	tif34	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531938	3361384	2541680	280460	278176	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC22F8.09	cid14	rrp16	-	nop53	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531939	3361384	2542480	280460	278940	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC2C4.03c	cid14	smd2	-	cwf9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531940	3361384	2538689	280460	275274	SPAC12G12.13c	SPCC1795.11	cid14	sum3	-	ded1|moc2|slh3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531941	3361384	2541013	280460	277528	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC3H7.13	cid14	far10	-	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531942	3361384	2543423	280460	279844	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC4H3.07c	cid14	SPAC4H3.07c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531943	3361384	2539389	280460	275954	SPAC12G12.13c	SPCC1827.05c	cid14	SPCC1827.05c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531944	3361384	2541448	280460	277953	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC1486.09	cid14	SPAC1486.09	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531945	3361384	2541274	280460	277788	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBP8B7.20c	cid14	nop2	-	SPBP8B7.20c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531946	3361384	2541814	280460	278305	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC23G3.06	cid14	SPAC23G3.06	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531947	3361384	2539413	280460	275978	SPAC12G12.13c	SPCP1E11.08	cid14	SPCP1E11.08	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531948	3361384	2538833	280460	275414	SPAC12G12.13c	SPCP1E11.11	cid14	puf6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531949	3361384	2543500	280460	279918	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC926.08c	cid14	SPAC926.08c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531950	3361384	2541919	280460	278409	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC227.02c	cid14	SPAC227.02c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531951	3361384	2538897	280460	275475	SPAC12G12.13c	SPCC1183.07	cid14	SPCC1183.07	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531952	3361384	2540858	280460	277375	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC428.19c	cid14	utp15	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531953	3361384	2543549	280460	279966	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC890.04c	cid14	SPAC890.04c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531954	3361384	2539275	280460	275843	SPAC12G12.13c	SPCC1450.04	cid14	tef5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531955	3361384	2543455	280460	279875	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC3G9.09c	cid14	tif211	-	eIF2alpha	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531956	3361384	2542942	280460	279383	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC32A11.04c	cid14	tif212	-	SPAC6B12.17c|tif22	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531957	3361384	2539738	280460	276290	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC17G9.09	cid14	tif213	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531958	3361384	2539938	280460	276482	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC17D11.05	cid14	tif32	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531959	3361384	2543621	280460	280035	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC4A8.16c	cid14	tif33	-	SPAC823.01c|SPAC1E11.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531960	3361384	2542694	280460	279147	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC26H5.10c	cid14	tif51	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531961	3361384	2542290	280460	278758	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC17C9.03	cid14	tif471	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531962	3361384	2539126	280460	275698	SPAC12G12.13c	SPCC1919.09	cid14	tif6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531963	3361384	2539380	280460	275946	SPAC12G12.13c	SPCC18.05c	cid14	SPCC18.05c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531964	3361384	2542777	280460	279226	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC6F6.03c	cid14	SPAC6F6.03c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531965	3361384	2540184	280460	276717	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC106.12c	cid14	SPBC106.12c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
531966	3361384	2540565	280460	277092	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC1D7.04	cid14	mlo3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhang K (2011)	21436456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
532189	2541839	2541839	278330	278330	SPAC22E12.10c	SPAC22E12.10c	etp1	etp1	cox15	cox15	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Mueller JJ (2011)	21536008	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
532200	2541522	2540578	278023	277104	SPAC23E2.01	SPBC26H8.06	fep1	grx4	gaf2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kim KD (2011)	21531205	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
532201	2541522	2540578	278023	277104	SPAC23E2.01	SPBC26H8.06	fep1	grx4	gaf2	-	FRET	physical	Kim KD (2011)	21531205	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) analysis	-	BIOGRID
532242	2541251	2539971	277765	276515	SPBC947.10	SPBC1105.04c	dsc1	cbp1	-	abp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.026639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532243	2541251	2543317	277765	279741	SPBC947.10	SPAC823.14	dsc1	ptf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.050376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532244	2541251	2539434	277765	275997	SPBC947.10	SPCC757.09c	dsc1	rnc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.073237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532245	2541251	2541510	277765	278012	SPBC947.10	SPAC22A12.02c	dsc1	mug103	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.123892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532246	2541251	2542689	277765	279142	SPBC947.10	SPAC29B12.04	dsc1	snz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.124615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532247	2541251	2542398	277765	278862	SPBC947.10	SPAC1805.03c	dsc1	trm13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.169056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532248	2541251	2540906	277765	277422	SPBC947.10	SPBC365.20c	dsc1	pnc1	-	SPBC557.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.276082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532249	2541251	2542560	277765	279016	SPBC947.10	SPAC1851.02	dsc1	slc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.288226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532250	2541251	2541830	277765	278321	SPBC947.10	SPAC5H10.01	dsc1	SPAC5H10.01	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.325908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532251	2541251	2543631	277765	280045	SPBC947.10	SPAC458.02c	dsc1	SPAC458.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.385071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532252	2541251	2538990	277765	275564	SPBC947.10	SPCC1494.05c	dsc1	ubp12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.386841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532253	2541251	2541086	277765	277601	SPBC947.10	SPBC685.04c	dsc1	aps2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.417473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532254	2541251	2543427	277765	279847	SPBC947.10	SPAPB1A10.15	dsc1	arv1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.425725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532255	2541251	2542439	277765	278901	SPBC947.10	SPAC17A5.08	dsc1	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.467555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532256	2541251	2540800	277765	277319	SPBC947.10	SPBC409.20c	dsc1	psh3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.539588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532257	2541251	2542450	277765	278911	SPBC947.10	SPAC13C5.04	dsc1	SPAC13C5.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.69627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532258	2541251	2543198	277765	279627	SPBC947.10	SPAC31A2.11c	dsc1	cuf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.728102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532259	2541251	2542519	277765	278977	SPBC947.10	SPAC19G12.08	dsc1	scs7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.843296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532260	2541251	2539487	277765	276050	SPBC947.10	SPCC895.05	dsc1	for3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.015024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532261	2541251	3361520	277765	280596	SPBC947.10	SPAC1610.02c	dsc1	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.272072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532262	2541251	2539291	277765	275859	SPBC947.10	SPCC757.10	dsc1	vph2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.491675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532263	2542884	2541166	279329	277681	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC725.15	dsc2	ura5	ucp14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.006018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532264	2542884	2541058	279329	277573	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC3H7.09	dsc2	erf2	ucp14	mug142	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.013101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532265	2542884	2541480	279329	277982	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC23D3.10c	dsc2	eng2	ucp14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.018218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532266	2542884	2541451	279329	277956	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC23G3.02c	dsc2	sib1	ucp14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.084273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532267	2542884	2543308	279329	279732	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC694.04c	dsc2	SPAC694.04c	ucp14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.086413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532268	2542884	2539398	279329	275963	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC965.10	dsc2	SPCC965.10	ucp14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.100505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532269	2542884	2542973	279329	279412	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC10F6.04	dsc2	SPAC10F6.04	ucp14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.109837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532270	2542884	2541512	279329	278013	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC11E3.08c	dsc2	nse6	ucp14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.174791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532271	2542884	2541896	279329	278386	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC23H4.16c	dsc2	SPAC23H4.16c	ucp14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.184821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532272	2542884	2539689	279329	276244	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC1861.03	dsc2	mak10	ucp14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.188365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532273	2542884	2539478	279329	276041	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC550.07	dsc2	SPCC550.07	ucp14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.202968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532274	2542884	2539555	279329	276116	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC4B3.08	dsc2	lsg1	ucp14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.275775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532275	2542884	2540432	279329	276960	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC25H2.05	dsc2	egd2	ucp14	nac1|ucp15	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.277725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532276	2542884	2542303	279329	278770	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC1687.21	dsc2	SPAC1687.21	ucp14	SPAC222.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.284905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532277	2542884	2541035	279329	277550	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC3E7.05c	dsc2	SPBC3E7.05c	ucp14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.315647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532278	2542884	2538750	279329	275333	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC622.04	dsc2	SPCC622.04	ucp14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.318951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532279	2542884	2540533	279329	277061	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC29A10.16c	dsc2	SPBC29A10.16c	ucp14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.354886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532280	2542884	2542177	279329	278652	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC17H9.08	dsc2	SPAC17H9.08	ucp14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.391405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532281	2542884	2540375	279329	276904	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC2G2.06c	dsc2	apl1	ucp14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.39155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532282	2542884	2541121	279329	277636	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC609.03	dsc2	iqw1	ucp14	iqwd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.411204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532283	2542884	2541628	279329	278124	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC110.02	dsc2	pds5	ucp14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.424089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532284	2542884	2540683	279329	277208	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC19G7.04	dsc2	SPBC19G7.04	ucp14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.487409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532285	2542884	2541757	279329	278251	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC2F7.10	dsc2	akr1	ucp14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.56492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532286	2542884	2540314	279329	276844	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC2G5.03	dsc2	ctu1	ucp14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.645658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532287	2542884	2540176	279329	276709	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC1709.01	dsc2	chs2	ucp14	SPBC1734.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.912859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532288	2542884	2540960	279329	277476	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC3D6.02	dsc2	but2	ucp14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.975719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532289	2542884	2539971	279329	276515	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC1105.04c	dsc2	cbp1	ucp14	abp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.204894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532290	2542884	2542519	279329	278977	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC19G12.08	dsc2	scs7	ucp14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.222295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532291	2542884	2539763	279329	276314	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC1861.05	dsc2	SPBC1861.05	ucp14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.323787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532292	2542884	2543198	279329	279627	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC31A2.11c	dsc2	cuf1	ucp14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.405131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532293	2542884	2540800	279329	277319	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC409.20c	dsc2	psh3	ucp14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.490055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532294	2542884	2538854	279329	275435	SPAC1486.02c	SPCP1E11.05c	dsc2	are2	ucp14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.584341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532295	2542884	2541478	279329	277980	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC2F7.17	dsc2	mrf1	ucp14	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.123956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532296	2541990	2543198	278474	279627	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC31A2.11c	dsc3	cuf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.00309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532297	2541990	2539472	278474	276035	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC794.03	dsc3	SPCC794.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.003366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532298	2541990	2539160	278474	275732	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC18.17c	dsc3	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.023722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532299	2541990	2539188	278474	275759	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC1827.04	dsc3	vms1	-	SPCC1827.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.026841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532300	2541990	2540382	278474	276911	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC27B12.05	dsc3	SPBC27B12.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532301	2541990	2541451	278474	277956	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC23G3.02c	dsc3	sib1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532302	2541990	2539820	278474	276370	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC1709.13c	dsc3	set10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.050108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532303	2541990	2540821	278474	277339	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC800.03	dsc3	clr3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.078789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532304	2541990	2541854	278474	278345	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC1F8.06	dsc3	fta5	-	sma5|pfl8	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.084513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532305	2541990	2539731	278474	276283	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC1271.09	dsc3	SPBC1271.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.087183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532306	2541990	2542053	278474	278532	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC2F3.07c	dsc3	SPAC2F3.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.105099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532307	2541990	2543550	278474	279967	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC922.06	dsc3	SPAC922.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.120352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532308	2541990	2541215	278474	277729	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC887.16	dsc3	SPBC887.16	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532309	2541990	2542964	278474	279404	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC12G12.07c	dsc3	SPAC12G12.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.176135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532310	2541990	2539702	278474	276255	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC1604.12	dsc3	SPBC1604.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.202651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532311	2541990	2540485	278474	277013	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC3B9.05	dsc3	SPBC3B9.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.20513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532312	2541990	2539774	278474	276325	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC17A3.10	dsc3	pas4	-	pi036	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.21665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532313	2541990	2540533	278474	277061	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC29A10.16c	dsc3	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.226414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532314	2541990	2541017	278474	277532	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC36.07	dsc3	elp1	-	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.270755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532315	2541990	2543331	278474	279754	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC56E4.07	dsc3	SPAC56E4.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.277807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532316	2541990	2540680	278474	277205	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC26H8.05c	dsc3	pph3	-	SPBC26H8.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.293718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532317	2541990	2539461	278474	276024	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC63.08c	dsc3	atg1	-	cvt10|ppk36	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.303503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532318	2541990	2541067	278474	277582	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC337.07c	dsc3	ecm14	-	SPBC337.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.308654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532319	2541990	2541801	278474	278292	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC2F7.08c	dsc3	snf5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.333435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532320	2541990	2541723	278474	278217	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC22H12.01c	dsc3	mug35	-	SPAC23G3.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.367463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532321	2541990	2542515	278474	278973	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC1952.09c	dsc3	SPAC1952.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.382095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532322	2541990	2541116	278474	277631	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC609.04	dsc3	caf5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.40438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532323	2541990	2541929	278474	278417	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC23C4.12	dsc3	hhp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.465168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532324	2541990	2540396	278474	276924	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC31F10.12	dsc3	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.525325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532325	2541990	2540220	278474	276753	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC337.03	dsc3	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.535003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532326	2541990	2539063	278474	275635	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC126.12	dsc3	SPCC126.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.54738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532327	2541990	2538861	278474	275441	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC1620.11	dsc3	nup97	-	mug87	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.583599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532328	2541990	2540226	278474	276758	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC32H8.08c	dsc3	omh5	-	pi016|SPACTOKYO_453.20	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.673147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532329	2541990	2542340	278474	278806	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC16E8.14c	dsc3	tae1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.695115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532330	2541990	2540346	278474	276875	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC2F12.03c	dsc3	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.705721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532331	2541990	2540800	278474	277319	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC409.20c	dsc3	psh3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.810608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532332	2541990	2540415	278474	276943	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC30B4.06c	dsc3	SPBC30B4.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.819365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532333	2541990	2539729	278474	276281	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC11B10.07c	dsc3	ivn1	-	pi004|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.876834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532334	2541990	2541757	278474	278251	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC2F7.10	dsc3	akr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.940512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532335	2541990	2539555	278474	276116	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC4B3.08	dsc3	lsg1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.003458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532336	2541990	2539850	278474	276398	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC15D4.07c	dsc3	atg9	-	apg9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.008275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532337	2541990	2542519	278474	278977	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC19G12.08	dsc3	scs7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.174713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532338	2541990	2542560	278474	279016	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC1851.02	dsc3	slc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.211495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532339	2541990	2542327	278474	278793	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC16C9.06c	dsc3	upf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.256942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532340	2541990	2539291	278474	275859	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC757.10	dsc3	vph2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.58263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532341	2541990	2543662	278474	280076	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC9.07c	dsc3	SPAC9.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.092482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532342	2543396	2538787	279818	275368	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC364.02c	dsc4	bis1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.000882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532343	2543396	2541800	279818	278291	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC732.02c	dsc4	SPAC732.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.009748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532344	2543396	2540717	279818	277240	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC577.12	dsc4	dph6	-	mug71	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.077758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532345	2543396	2542630	279818	279084	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC2C4.06c	dsc4	SPAC2C4.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.08587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532346	2543396	2542958	279818	279398	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC12G12.09	dsc4	SPAC12G12.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.11497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532347	2543396	2541451	279818	277956	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC23G3.02c	dsc4	sib1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.131156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532348	2543396	2539188	279818	275759	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC1827.04	dsc4	vms1	-	SPCC1827.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.135876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532349	2543396	2539774	279818	276325	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC17A3.10	dsc4	pas4	-	pi036	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.179309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532350	2543396	2540432	279818	276960	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC25H2.05	dsc4	egd2	-	nac1|ucp15	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.187755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532351	2543396	2538708	279818	275292	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC594.01	dsc4	SPCC594.01	-	SPCC736.16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.190991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532352	2543396	2543510	279818	279928	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC30D11.07	dsc4	nth1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.278815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532353	2543396	2541959	279818	278446	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC23C4.03	dsc4	hrk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.301929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532354	2543396	2542177	279818	278652	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC17H9.08	dsc4	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.307051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532355	2543396	2539276	279818	275844	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC622.07	dsc4	SPCC622.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.376945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532356	2543396	2540633	279818	277159	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC21D10.12	dsc4	hob1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.393003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532357	2543396	2541086	279818	277601	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC685.04c	dsc4	aps2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.394479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532358	2543396	2542549	279818	279006	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC19A8.11c	dsc4	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.404544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532359	2543396	2543046	279818	279481	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC3C7.10	dsc4	pex13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.413094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532360	2543396	2542124	279818	278600	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC19A8.14	dsc4	SPAC19A8.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.423444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532361	2543396	2542919	279818	279360	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC6C3.08	dsc4	nas6	-	SPAC6C3.08	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.443671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532362	2543396	2538854	279818	275435	SPAC4D7.11	SPCP1E11.05c	dsc4	are2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.49916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532363	2543396	2540039	279818	276579	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC16A3.02c	dsc4	SPBC16A3.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.499215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532364	2543396	2539841	279818	276389	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC17D1.05	dsc4	SPBC17D1.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.50682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532365	2543396	2542519	279818	278977	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC19G12.08	dsc4	scs7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.666569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532366	2543396	2542253	279818	278723	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC17H9.04c	dsc4	SPAC17H9.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.705872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532367	2543396	2539314	279818	275880	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC548.05c	dsc4	dbl5	-	SPCC548.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.775902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532368	2543396	2541478	279818	277980	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC2F7.17	dsc4	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.805238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532369	2543396	2540332	279818	276862	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC2A9.05c	dsc4	tvp23	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.820409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532370	2543396	2540800	279818	277319	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC409.20c	dsc4	psh3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.990925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532371	2543396	2539291	279818	275859	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC757.10	dsc4	vph2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.329758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532372	2543396	2543542	279818	279959	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC823.09c	dsc4	SPAC823.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.609819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532373	2543396	2539763	279818	276314	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC1861.05	dsc4	SPBC1861.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.695855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532374	2540730	2540930	277253	277446	SPBC19C2.09	SPBC354.10	sre1	def1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.011393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532375	2540730	2541943	277253	278430	SPBC19C2.09	SPAC222.07c	sre1	hri2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532376	2540730	2540913	277253	277429	SPBC19C2.09	SPBC56F2.08c	sre1	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.050989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532377	2540730	2540975	277253	277491	SPBC19C2.09	SPBC354.12	sre1	gpd3	-	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.222837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532378	2540730	2541982	277253	278467	SPBC19C2.09	SPAC23A1.06c	sre1	cmk2	-	mkp2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.242894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532379	2540730	2541694	277253	278190	SPBC19C2.09	SPAC1071.04c	sre1	spc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.283793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532380	2540730	2543190	277253	279619	SPBC19C2.09	SPAC31F12.01	sre1	zds1	-	SPAC637.14|mug88	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.488165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532381	2540730	2540229	277253	276761	SPBC19C2.09	SPBC31F10.15c	sre1	atp15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.819643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532382	2540730	2541488	277253	277990	SPBC19C2.09	SPAC227.17c	sre1	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.878391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532383	2541044	2541510	277559	278012	SPBC354.05c	SPAC22A12.02c	sre2	mug103	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.001193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532384	2541044	2542560	277559	279016	SPBC354.05c	SPAC1851.02	sre2	slc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.020341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532385	2541044	2540318	277559	276848	SPBC354.05c	SPBC30B4.04c	sre2	sol1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.024019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532386	2541044	2542806	277559	279254	SPBC354.05c	SPAC1610.01	sre2	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532387	2541044	2542047	277559	278528	SPBC354.05c	SPAC21E11.03c	sre2	pcr1	-	mts2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.05199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532388	2541044	2543048	277559	279483	SPBC354.05c	SPAC3F10.02c	sre2	trk1	-	sptrk	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.089822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532389	2541044	2539908	277559	276454	SPBC354.05c	SPBC13E7.06	sre2	msd1	-	mug172	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.160156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532390	2541044	2539500	277559	276063	SPBC354.05c	SPCC61.03	sre2	SPCC61.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.166707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532391	2541044	2543194	277559	279623	SPBC354.05c	SPAC3G6.05	sre2	SPAC3G6.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.277426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532392	2541044	2543198	277559	279627	SPBC354.05c	SPAC31A2.11c	sre2	cuf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.287253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532393	2541044	2543542	277559	279959	SPBC354.05c	SPAC823.09c	sre2	SPAC823.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.337661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532394	2541044	2542439	277559	278901	SPBC354.05c	SPAC17A5.08	sre2	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.377214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532395	2541044	2539931	277559	276475	SPBC354.05c	SPBC12C2.09c	sre2	SPBC12C2.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.432045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532396	2541044	2541830	277559	278321	SPBC354.05c	SPAC5H10.01	sre2	SPAC5H10.01	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.473423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532397	2541044	2538949	277559	275523	SPBC354.05c	SPCC320.03	sre2	SPCC320.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.53491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532398	2541044	2541162	277559	277677	SPBC354.05c	SPBC691.03c	sre2	apl3	-	pi033|SPACTOKYO_453.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.650003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532399	2541044	2539998	277559	276542	SPBC354.05c	SPBC16G5.03	sre2	SPBC16G5.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.687978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532400	2541044	2539487	277559	276050	SPBC354.05c	SPCC895.05	sre2	for3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.822633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532401	2541251	2539427	277765	275992	SPBC947.10	SPCC663.15c	dsc1	SPCC663.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.675805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532402	2541251	2541038	277765	277553	SPBC947.10	SPBC29A10.01	dsc1	ccr1	-	SPBC365.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.27308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532403	2541251	2541774	277765	278268	SPBC947.10	SPAC22E12.05c	dsc1	rer1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.781374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532404	2541251	2539302	277765	275870	SPBC947.10	SPCC126.09	dsc1	zip2	-	SPCC126.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.317731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532405	2541251	2540029	277765	276573	SPBC947.10	SPBC16A3.01	dsc1	spn3	-	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.251899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532406	2541251	2541522	277765	278023	SPBC947.10	SPAC23E2.01	dsc1	fep1	-	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.828403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532407	2541251	2542403	277765	278867	SPBC947.10	SPAC19A8.05c	dsc1	sst4	-	vps27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.784611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532408	2541251	2540725	277765	277248	SPBC947.10	SPBC215.14c	dsc1	vps20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.483532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532409	2541251	2541543	277765	278043	SPBC947.10	SPAC5H10.04	dsc1	SPAC5H10.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.94883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532410	2541251	2538792	277765	275373	SPBC947.10	SPCP1E11.10	dsc1	SPCP1E11.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.903309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532411	2541251	2541558	277765	278057	SPBC947.10	SPAC1F7.08	dsc1	fio1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.688946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532412	2541251	2539743	277765	276295	SPBC947.10	SPBC16A3.08c	dsc1	oga1	-	SPBC16A3.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.363268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532413	2541251	2543637	277765	280051	SPBC947.10	SPAC3H8.02	dsc1	csr102	-	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.912166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532414	2541251	2540524	277765	277052	SPBC947.10	SPBC21B10.08c	dsc1	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.878147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532415	2541251	2538801	277765	275382	SPBC947.10	SPCC285.13c	dsc1	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.501952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532416	2541251	2539169	277765	275740	SPBC947.10	SPCC1235.11	dsc1	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.49145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532417	2541251	2542419	277765	278882	SPBC947.10	SPAC17G6.05c	dsc1	bro1	-	SPAC17G6.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.452621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532418	2541251	2539463	277765	276026	SPBC947.10	SPCC550.11	dsc1	SPCC550.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.262623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532419	2541251	2540492	277765	277020	SPBC947.10	SPBC2D10.13	dsc1	est1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.921913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532420	2541251	2538774	277765	275356	SPBC947.10	SPCC162.06c	dsc1	SPCC162.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.912414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532421	2541251	2541611	277765	278108	SPBC947.10	SPAC1527.02	dsc1	sft2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.804688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532422	2541251	2541357	277765	277868	SPBC947.10	SPBPB7E8.01	dsc1	SPBPB7E8.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.493031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532423	2541251	2539051	277765	275624	SPBC947.10	SPCC1183.11	dsc1	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.254069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532424	2541251	2542707	277765	279160	SPBC947.10	SPAC25G10.03	dsc1	zip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.183827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532425	2541251	2541380	277765	277891	SPBC947.10	SPBPB2B2.13	dsc1	gal1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.129535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532426	2541251	2542710	277765	279163	SPBC947.10	SPAC750.08c	dsc1	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.043621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532427	2541251	2543521	277765	279939	SPBC947.10	SPAC4F8.01	dsc1	did4	-	SPAC644.03c|vps2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.022025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532428	2541251	2541296	277765	277808	SPBC947.10	SPBP8B7.06	dsc1	rpp201	-	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.010812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532429	2541251	2542989	277765	279427	SPBC947.10	SPAC11E3.13c	dsc1	gas5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.003495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532430	2541251	2540152	277765	276688	SPBC947.10	SPBC12C2.03c	dsc1	SPBC12C2.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.981794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532431	2541251	2540665	277765	277190	SPBC947.10	SPBC83.02c	dsc1	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.876408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532432	2541251	2542423	277765	278885	SPBC947.10	SPAC17G6.08	dsc1	pep7	-	vac1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.49138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532433	2541251	2542103	277765	278579	SPBC947.10	SPAC31G5.11	dsc1	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.428426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532434	2541251	2542983	277765	279421	SPBC947.10	SPAC11D3.15	dsc1	SPAC11D3.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.389668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532435	2541251	2543453	277765	279873	SPBC947.10	SPAC3G9.03	dsc1	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.318203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532436	2541251	2541576	277765	278073	SPBC947.10	SPBC1348.02	dsc1	SPBC1348.02	-	SPAC1348.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.245237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532437	2541251	2543683	277765	280097	SPBC947.10	SPAPB1E7.04c	dsc1	SPAPB1E7.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.224047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532438	2541251	2539213	277765	275783	SPBC947.10	SPCC285.10c	dsc1	SPCC285.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.134122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532439	2541251	2538961	277765	275535	SPBC947.10	SPCC285.14	dsc1	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.99226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532440	2541251	2542641	277765	279095	SPBC947.10	SPAC24C9.15c	dsc1	spn5	-	mde9|meu28	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.931489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532441	2541251	2540647	277765	277172	SPBC947.10	SPBC18H10.07	dsc1	SPBC18H10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.895141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532442	2541251	2538889	277765	275467	SPBC947.10	SPCC1393.07c	dsc1	mug4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.622914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532443	2541251	2542029	277765	278511	SPBC947.10	SPAC8E11.02c	dsc1	rad24	-	anr5|sam4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.601198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532444	2541251	2539582	277765	276141	SPBC947.10	SPCC594.07c	dsc1	bqt3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.575965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532445	2541251	2541142	277765	277657	SPBC947.10	SPBC725.04	dsc1	SPBC725.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.523184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532446	2541251	2540306	277765	276836	SPBC947.10	SPBC2G5.02c	dsc1	ckb2	-	SPBC2G5.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.482986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532447	2541251	2540147	277765	276684	SPBC947.10	SPBC16E9.07	dsc1	mug100	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.476191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532448	2541251	2542802	277765	279250	SPBC947.10	SPAC15E1.06	dsc1	vps29	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.389501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532449	2541251	2539939	277765	276483	SPBC947.10	SPBC11G11.01	dsc1	fis1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.299018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532450	2541251	2542254	277765	278724	SPBC947.10	SPAC30D11.04c	dsc1	nup124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.238941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532451	2541251	2542946	277765	279386	SPBC947.10	SPAC6F12.03c	dsc1	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.227907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532452	2541251	2541183	277765	277697	SPBC947.10	SPBC725.14	dsc1	arg6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.177381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532453	2541251	2543220	277765	279648	SPBC947.10	SPAPB21F2.02	dsc1	SPAPB21F2.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.115032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532454	2541251	2542135	277765	278611	SPBC947.10	SPAC13A11.04c	dsc1	ubp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.080758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532455	2541251	2539013	277765	275586	SPBC947.10	SPCC364.03	dsc1	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.014046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532456	2541251	2539865	277765	276412	SPBC947.10	SPBC17G9.08c	dsc1	cnt5	-	csx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.000774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532457	2541251	2541664	277765	278160	SPBC947.10	SPAC2H10.01	dsc1	SPAC2H10.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.93244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532458	2541251	2542273	277765	278742	SPBC947.10	SPAC17H9.13c	dsc1	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.877927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532459	2541251	2541475	277765	277977	SPBC947.10	SPAC24B11.09	dsc1	mpc2	-	SPAC24B11.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.823587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532460	2541251	2540957	277765	277473	SPBC947.10	SPBC409.11	dsc1	meu18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.813898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532461	2541251	2538830	277765	275411	SPBC947.10	SPCC1393.13	dsc1	SPCC1393.13	-	prl64|SPNCRNA.64	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.804223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532462	2541251	2539156	277765	275728	SPBC947.10	SPCC1450.08c	dsc1	wtf16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.727326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532463	2541251	2540828	277765	277346	SPBC947.10	SPBC4B4.06	dsc1	vps25	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.713476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532464	2541251	2539035	277765	275608	SPBC947.10	SPCC794.09c	dsc1	tef101	-	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.706395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532465	2541251	2538692	277765	275277	SPBC947.10	SPCC162.04c	dsc1	wtf13	-	wtf12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.646242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532466	2541251	2539071	277765	275643	SPBC947.10	SPCC1322.03	dsc1	trp1322	-	SPCC1322.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.625224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532467	2541251	2541156	277765	277671	SPBC947.10	SPBC685.07c	dsc1	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.592475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532468	2541251	2540001	277765	276545	SPBC947.10	SPBC1289.13c	dsc1	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.587565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532469	2541251	2543525	277765	279943	SPBC947.10	SPAC4A8.14	dsc1	SPAC4A8.14	-	prs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.450848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532470	2541251	2542677	277765	279130	SPBC947.10	SPAC26F1.10c	dsc1	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.450372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532471	2541251	2540208	277765	276741	SPBC947.10	SPBC9B6.03	dsc1	SPBC9B6.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.421196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532472	2541251	2541632	277765	278128	SPBC947.10	SPAC323.07c	dsc1	SPAC323.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.418378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532473	2541251	2543495	277765	279914	SPBC947.10	SPAC513.03	dsc1	mfm2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.417411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532474	2541251	2542762	277765	279212	SPBC947.10	SPAC167.06c	dsc1	mug143	-	SPAC57A7.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.416709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532475	2541251	2539857	277765	276404	SPBC947.10	SPBC1604.20c	dsc1	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.404484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532476	2541251	2540278	277765	276809	SPBC947.10	SPBC1A4.04	dsc1	SPBC1A4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.400494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532477	2541251	2541806	277765	278297	SPBC947.10	SPAC4G8.13c	dsc1	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.299269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532478	2541251	2541439	277765	277944	SPBC947.10	SPAC22F8.11	dsc1	plc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.292577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532479	2541251	2538756	277765	275339	SPBC947.10	SPCC1795.10c	dsc1	SPCC1795.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.289128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532480	2541251	2539576	277765	276136	SPBC947.10	SPCC794.01c	dsc1	zwf2	-	SPCC794.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.28281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532481	2541251	2542617	277765	279071	SPBC947.10	SPAC13A11.01c	dsc1	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.278405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532482	2541251	2542469	277765	278930	SPBC947.10	SPAC19A8.04	dsc1	erg5	-	cyp61	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.266175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532483	2541251	2542838	277765	279284	SPBC947.10	SPAC13G7.11	dsc1	SPAC13G7.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.237573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532484	2541251	2543646	277765	280060	SPBC947.10	SPAC821.07c	dsc1	moc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.236166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532485	2541251	2539237	277765	275807	SPBC947.10	SPCC24B10.13	dsc1	skb5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.168061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532486	2541251	2540489	277765	277017	SPBC947.10	SPBC25H2.03	dsc1	SPBC25H2.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.161668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532487	2541251	2542318	277765	278784	SPBC947.10	SPAC16C9.05	dsc1	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.149448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532488	2541251	2540263	277765	276794	SPBC947.10	SPBC32H8.02c	dsc1	nep2	-	mug120|pi021|SPACTOKYO_453.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.116619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532489	2541251	2539147	277765	275719	SPBC947.10	SPCC622.12c	dsc1	gdh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.102017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532490	2541251	2541708	277765	278203	SPBC947.10	SPAC31A2.02	dsc1	trm112	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.060826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532491	2541251	2543327	277765	279750	SPBC947.10	SPAC1D4.06c	dsc1	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532492	2541251	2540201	277765	276734	SPBC947.10	SPBC13A2.04c	dsc1	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.037725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532493	2541251	2543361	277765	279783	SPBC947.10	SPAC823.10c	dsc1	SPAC823.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.995639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532494	2541251	2540333	277765	276863	SPBC947.10	SPBC21B10.07	dsc1	SPBC21B10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.962406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532495	2541251	2543301	277765	279726	SPBC947.10	SPAC977.17	dsc1	SPAC977.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.957377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532496	2541251	2539249	277765	275819	SPBC947.10	SPCC1450.05c	dsc1	rox3	-	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.950803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532497	2541251	2540357	277765	276886	SPBC947.10	SPBC2F12.05c	dsc1	SPBC2F12.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.935931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532498	2541251	2542541	277765	278998	SPBC947.10	SPAC1B3.03c	dsc1	wis2	-	cyp5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.923044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532499	2541251	2541998	277765	278482	SPBC947.10	SPAC23A1.09	dsc1	SPAC23A1.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.91407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532500	2541251	2541311	277765	277823	SPBC947.10	SPBP8B7.09c	dsc1	los1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.904765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532501	2541251	2542816	277765	279263	SPBC947.10	SPAC4G8.11c	dsc1	atp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.885498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532502	2541251	2542767	277765	279217	SPBC947.10	SPAC1565.07c	dsc1	knd1	-	SPAC1565.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.877751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532503	2541251	3361128	277765	280204	SPBC947.10	SPCC1442.04c	dsc1	SPCC1442.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.868324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532504	2541251	2540714	277765	277237	SPBC947.10	SPBC19C2.04c	dsc1	ubp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.796745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532505	2541251	2542120	277765	278596	SPBC947.10	SPAC6F6.13c	dsc1	SPAC6F6.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.753906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532506	2541251	2543064	277765	279497	SPBC947.10	SPAC3G6.01	dsc1	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.752254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532507	2541251	2541674	277765	278170	SPBC947.10	SPAC1556.07	dsc1	pmm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.747493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532508	2541251	2543445	277765	279865	SPBC947.10	SPAC4F10.13c	dsc1	mpd2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.710928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532509	2541251	2542357	277765	278822	SPBC947.10	SPAC1782.07	dsc1	qcr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.703828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532510	2541251	2542759	277765	279209	SPBC947.10	SPAC9G1.07	dsc1	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.697061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532511	2541251	2542875	277765	279320	SPBC947.10	SPAC13G7.02c	dsc1	ssa1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.679182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532512	2541251	2543400	277765	279822	SPBC947.10	SPAC3G9.11c	dsc1	SPAC3G9.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.674565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532513	2541251	2542464	277765	278925	SPBC947.10	SPAC1A6.09c	dsc1	lag1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.660254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532514	2541251	2542571	277765	279027	SPBC947.10	SPAC589.02c	dsc1	med13	-	spTrap240|srb9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.655751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532515	2541251	2540146	277765	276683	SPBC947.10	SPBC17A3.06	dsc1	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.639532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532516	2541251	2539898	277765	276444	SPBC947.10	SPBC12D12.07c	dsc1	trx2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.625048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532517	2541251	2543087	277765	279520	SPBC947.10	SPAC30C2.04	dsc1	SPAC30C2.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.618482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532518	2541251	2542516	277765	278974	SPBC947.10	SPAC2F7.04	dsc1	pmc2	-	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.613102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532519	2541251	2542197	277765	278672	SPBC947.10	SPAC1142.01	dsc1	rqc1	-	SPAC1142.01|SPAC17G6.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.612344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532520	2541251	2538993	277765	275567	SPBC947.10	SPCC162.12	dsc1	tco89	-	SPCC1753.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.605939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532521	2541251	2539679	277765	276234	SPBC947.10	SPBC12C2.05c	dsc1	bzz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.561842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532522	2541251	2541396	277765	277905	SPBC947.10	SPBPB10D8.02c	dsc1	SPBPB10D8.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.54209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532523	2541251	2542781	277765	279230	SPBC947.10	SPAC57A10.12c	dsc1	ura3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.520447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532524	2541251	2540086	277765	276624	SPBC947.10	SPBC16H5.12c	dsc1	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.505418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532525	2541251	3361030	277765	280106	SPBC947.10	SPCP20C8.03	dsc1	SPCP20C8.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.50026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532526	2541251	2539600	277765	276158	SPBC947.10	SPCP1E11.03	dsc1	mug170	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.489869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532527	2541251	2540565	277765	277092	SPBC947.10	SPBC1D7.04	dsc1	mlo3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.485774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532528	2541251	2543616	277765	280030	SPBC947.10	SPAC4A8.09c	dsc1	cwf21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.457253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532529	2541251	2541104	277765	277619	SPBC947.10	SPBC6B1.03c	dsc1	SPBC6B1.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.430443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532530	2541251	2541628	277765	278124	SPBC947.10	SPAC110.02	dsc1	pds5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.428694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532531	2541251	2541963	277765	278449	SPBC947.10	SPAC21E11.04	dsc1	aca1	-	ppr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.417088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532532	2541251	2542921	277765	279362	SPBC947.10	SPAC1093.01	dsc1	ppr5	-	SPAC12B10.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.409496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532533	2541251	2540631	277765	277157	SPBC947.10	SPBC25B2.10	dsc1	SPBC25B2.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.393252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532534	2541251	2543505	277765	279923	SPBC947.10	SPAC637.09	dsc1	SPAC637.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.38817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532535	2541251	2542093	277765	278570	SPBC947.10	SPAC26A3.04	dsc1	rpl2002	-	rpl20|rpl20-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.356095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532536	2541251	2539189	277765	275760	SPBC947.10	SPCC1682.16	dsc1	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.350338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532537	2541251	2541411	277765	277919	SPBC947.10	SPBPB2B2.12c	dsc1	gal10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.334874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532538	2541251	2541053	277765	277568	SPBC947.10	SPBC56F2.10c	dsc1	alg5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.329308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532539	2541251	2542881	277765	279326	SPBC947.10	SPAC13F5.03c	dsc1	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.302515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532540	2541251	2539519	277765	276081	SPBC947.10	SPCC364.05	dsc1	vps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.299742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532541	2541251	2543590	277765	280005	SPBC947.10	SPAC4C5.03	dsc1	SPAC4C5.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.297626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532542	2541251	2542055	277765	278534	SPBC947.10	SPAC6G9.03c	dsc1	mug183	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.293855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532543	2541251	2539893	277765	276439	SPBC947.10	SPBC1539.10	dsc1	nop16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.274575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532544	2541251	2539010	277765	275583	SPBC947.10	SPCC31H12.04c	dsc1	rpl1202	-	rpl12|rpl12-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.273614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532545	2541251	2541527	277765	278027	SPBC947.10	SPAC31A2.09c	dsc1	apm4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.27106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532546	2541251	2541536	277765	278036	SPBC947.10	SPAC1071.02	dsc1	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.264577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532547	2541251	2540380	277765	276909	SPBC947.10	SPBC1A4.05	dsc1	blt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.254195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532548	2541251	2539884	277765	276430	SPBC947.10	SPBC1711.04	dsc1	SPBC1711.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.160026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532549	2541251	2543291	277765	279716	SPBC947.10	SPAC9E9.04	dsc1	SPAC9E9.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.112739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532550	2541251	2542006	277765	278489	SPBC947.10	SPAC23A1.11	dsc1	rpl1602	-	rpl16-2|rpl13a-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.107598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532551	2541251	2542080	277765	278557	SPBC947.10	SPAC27D7.03c	dsc1	mei2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.085337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532552	2541251	2540527	277765	277055	SPBC947.10	SPBC23G7.13c	dsc1	SPBC23G7.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.077677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532553	2541251	2539958	277765	276502	SPBC947.10	SPBC1718.07c	dsc1	zfs1	-	moc4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.071078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532554	2541251	2542255	277765	278725	SPBC947.10	SPAC57A7.08	dsc1	pzh1	-	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.064196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532555	2541251	2543096	277765	279528	SPBC947.10	SPAC977.05c	dsc1	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.062276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532556	2541251	2539651	277765	276206	SPBC947.10	SPBC12D12.06	dsc1	srb11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.053128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532557	2541251	2539027	277765	275600	SPBC947.10	SPCC1322.08	dsc1	srk1	-	mkp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.035876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532558	2541251	2539170	277765	275741	SPBC947.10	SPCC306.02c	dsc1	SPCC306.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.029342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532559	2541251	3361491	277765	280567	SPBC947.10	SPAC1805.08	dsc1	dlc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.010625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532560	2541251	2542722	277765	279173	SPBC947.10	SPAC25H1.05	dsc1	meu29	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.00216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532561	2541251	2541552	277765	278051	SPBC947.10	SPAC1142.08	dsc1	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.00116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532562	2541251	2543190	277765	279619	SPBC947.10	SPAC31F12.01	dsc1	zds1	-	SPAC637.14|mug88	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.984465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532563	2541251	2540425	277765	276953	SPBC947.10	SPBC27.06c	dsc1	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.983377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532564	2541251	2540587	277765	277113	SPBC947.10	SPBC23G7.15c	dsc1	rpp202	-	rpp2-2|rpa4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.966129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532565	2541251	2538797	277765	275378	SPBC947.10	SPCC794.07	dsc1	lat1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.961746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532566	2541251	2543593	277765	280008	SPBC947.10	SPAC4G9.10	dsc1	arg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.956398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532567	2541251	2541532	277765	278032	SPBC947.10	SPAC2C4.15c	dsc1	ubx2	-	ucp13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.956183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532568	2541251	2538876	277765	275455	SPBC947.10	SPCC4B3.02c	dsc1	SPCC4B3.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.953779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532569	2541251	2543437	277765	279857	SPBC947.10	SPAPB1A10.14	dsc1	pof15	-	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.946629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532570	2541251	2542786	277765	279235	SPBC947.10	SPAC15A10.07	dsc1	SPAC15A10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.93139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532571	2541251	2543124	277765	279556	SPBC947.10	SPAC3A11.06	dsc1	mvp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.921868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532572	2541251	2542895	277765	279339	SPBC947.10	SPAC13G6.10c	dsc1	asl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.912412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532573	2541251	2542969	277765	279409	SPBC947.10	SPAC4G8.10	dsc1	gos1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.894058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532574	2541251	2542886	277765	279331	SPBC947.10	SPAC1486.01	dsc1	SPAC1486.01	-	sod2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.869891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532575	2541251	2542252	277765	278722	SPBC947.10	SPAC17A2.13c	dsc1	rad25	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.856528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532576	2541251	2543391	277765	279813	SPBC947.10	SPAC4G9.09c	dsc1	arg11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.837893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532577	2541251	2539239	277765	275809	SPBC947.10	SPCC1020.10	dsc1	oca2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.829577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532578	2541251	2543008	277765	279446	SPBC947.10	SPAC12B10.13	dsc1	SPAC12B10.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.826285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532579	2541251	2543224	277765	279652	SPBC947.10	SPAPB8E5.10	dsc1	SPAPB8E5.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.815194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532580	2541251	2540165	277765	276700	SPBC947.10	SPBC1683.02	dsc1	SPBC1683.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.804646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532581	2541251	2539420	277765	275985	SPBC947.10	SPCC970.07c	dsc1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.804628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532582	2541251	2542291	277765	278759	SPBC947.10	SPAC17C9.08	dsc1	pnu1	-	end1|nuc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.801333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532583	2541251	2540913	277765	277429	SPBC947.10	SPBC56F2.08c	dsc1	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.795655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532584	2541251	2538808	277765	275389	SPBC947.10	SPCPB16A4.05c	dsc1	SPCPB16A4.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.794848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532585	2541251	2541621	277765	278118	SPBC947.10	SPAC29A4.17c	dsc1	SPAC29A4.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.792634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532586	2541251	2542857	277765	279303	SPBC947.10	SPAC144.06	dsc1	apl5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.791805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532587	2541251	3361569	277765	280645	SPBC947.10	SPAC186.04c	dsc1	SPAC186.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.78896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532588	2541251	2542497	277765	278956	SPBC947.10	SPAC1A6.04c	dsc1	plb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.786821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532589	2541251	2540677	277765	277202	SPBC947.10	SPBC21B10.03c	dsc1	ath1	-	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532590	2541251	2538873	277765	275452	SPBC947.10	SPCC306.11	dsc1	SPCC306.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.774424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532591	2541251	2539148	277765	275720	SPBC947.10	SPCC132.04c	dsc1	gdh2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532592	2541251	2542288	277765	278756	SPBC947.10	SPAC17G6.02c	dsc1	tco1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.772413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532593	2541251	2542014	277765	278497	SPBC947.10	SPAC20H4.04	dsc1	fml2	-	mfh2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.768784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532594	2541251	2539128	277765	275700	SPBC947.10	SPCC1682.06	dsc1	SPCC1682.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.748801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532595	2541251	2541248	277765	277762	SPBC947.10	SPBC8D2.10c	dsc1	rmt3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.733633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532596	2541251	2543165	277765	279596	SPBC947.10	SPAC343.07	dsc1	mug28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.728488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532597	2541251	2540241	277765	276773	SPBC947.10	SPBC32H8.11	dsc1	mei4	-	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.723449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532598	2541251	2543363	277765	279785	SPBC947.10	SPAPB24D3.09c	dsc1	pdr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532599	2541251	2543090	277765	279523	SPBC947.10	SPBC1348.01	dsc1	SPBC1348.01	-	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532600	2541251	2542213	277765	278687	SPBC947.10	SPAC3G6.13c	dsc1	rpl4101	-	rpl41-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.694897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532601	2541251	2542220	277765	278694	SPBC947.10	SPAC1A6.03c	dsc1	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.683257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532602	2541251	2538800	277765	275381	SPBC947.10	SPCC1322.06	dsc1	kap113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.674851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532603	2541251	2542928	277765	279369	SPBC947.10	SPAC1142.06	dsc1	get3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.657902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532604	2541251	2542598	277765	279052	SPBC947.10	SPAC6G10.08	dsc1	idp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.651552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532605	2541251	2539807	277765	276357	SPBC947.10	SPBC1778.10c	dsc1	ppk21	-	SPBC4C3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.626072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532606	2541251	2539100	277765	275672	SPBC947.10	SPCC330.12c	dsc1	sdh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.624839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532607	2541251	2542756	277765	279206	SPBC947.10	SPAC15A10.16	dsc1	bud6	-	SPAC15E1.01|aip3|fat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.610631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532608	2541251	2541931	277765	278419	SPBC947.10	SPAC6G9.16c	dsc1	SPAC6G9.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.606413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532609	2541251	2543406	277765	279828	SPBC947.10	SPAC9.12c	dsc1	atp12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.602894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532610	2541251	2542951	277765	279391	SPBC947.10	SPAC1071.05	dsc1	SPAC1071.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.602117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532611	2541251	2540131	277765	276668	SPBC947.10	SPBC1778.05c	dsc1	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.596987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532612	2541251	2540026	277765	276570	SPBC947.10	SPBC16D10.08c	dsc1	hsp104	-	SPBC16D10.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.596193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532613	2541251	2539137	277765	275709	SPBC947.10	SPCC1682.08c	dsc1	mcp2	-	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.596189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532614	2541251	2541694	277765	278190	SPBC947.10	SPAC1071.04c	dsc1	spc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532615	2541251	2538796	277765	275377	SPBC947.10	SPCC63.06	dsc1	SPCC63.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532616	2541251	2539538	277765	276100	SPBC947.10	SPCC364.06	dsc1	nap1	-	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532617	2541251	2542614	277765	279068	SPBC947.10	SPAC1399.04c	dsc1	SPAC1399.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532618	2541251	2541762	277765	278256	SPBC947.10	SPAC139.01c	dsc1	SPAC139.01c	-	SPAC955.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532619	2541251	2540180	277765	276713	SPBC947.10	SPBC16D10.11c	dsc1	rps1801	-	rps18-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.558287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532620	2541251	2542522	277765	278980	SPBC947.10	SPAC19A8.03	dsc1	ymr1	-	SPAC19A8.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.557552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532621	2541251	3361269	277765	280345	SPBC947.10	SPBC31A8.01c	dsc1	rtn1	-	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.545725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532622	2541251	2542724	277765	279175	SPBC947.10	SPAC767.01c	dsc1	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.535515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532623	2541251	2541503	277765	278005	SPBC947.10	SPAC22A12.01c	dsc1	pso2	-	SPAC56F8.17c|snm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.520645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532624	2541251	2541923	277765	278411	SPBC947.10	SPAC23C4.09c	dsc1	SPAC23C4.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532625	2541251	2540886	277765	277403	SPBC947.10	SPBC4F6.10	dsc1	vps901	-	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.502549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532626	2542884	2540828	279329	277346	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC4B4.06	dsc2	vps25	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.818643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532627	2542884	2542403	279329	278867	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC19A8.05c	dsc2	sst4	ucp14	vps27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.05324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532628	2542884	2541038	279329	277553	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC29A10.01	dsc2	ccr1	ucp14	SPBC365.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.410897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532629	2542884	2541522	279329	278023	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC23E2.01	dsc2	fep1	ucp14	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.351068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532630	2542884	2539603	279329	276161	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC1289.06c	dsc2	ppr8	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.110176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532631	2542884	2539169	279329	275740	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC1235.11	dsc2	mpc1	ucp14	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.082994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532632	2542884	2541439	279329	277944	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC22F8.11	dsc2	plc1	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.71282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532633	2542884	2543521	279329	279939	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC4F8.01	dsc2	did4	ucp14	SPAC644.03c|vps2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.703937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532634	2542884	2540725	279329	277248	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC215.14c	dsc2	vps20	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.126309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532635	2542884	2540146	279329	276683	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC17A3.06	dsc2	SPBC17A3.06	ucp14	pi040	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.615253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532636	2542884	2543654	279329	280068	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC4H3.04c	dsc2	SPAC4H3.04c	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.578481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532637	2542884	2542554	279329	279011	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC1952.03	dsc2	otu2	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.381176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532638	2542884	2538756	279329	275339	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC1795.10c	dsc2	SPCC1795.10c	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.858372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532639	2542884	2542291	279329	278759	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC17C9.08	dsc2	pnu1	ucp14	end1|nuc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.819107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532640	2542884	2543391	279329	279813	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC4G9.09c	dsc2	arg11	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.576916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532641	2542884	2542950	279329	279390	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC12B10.03	dsc2	bun62	ucp14	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.418524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532642	2542884	2542577	279329	279033	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC19G12.15c	dsc2	tpp1	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.314301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532643	2542884	2541380	279329	277891	SPAC1486.02c	SPBPB2B2.13	dsc2	gal1	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.283785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532644	2542884	2542254	279329	278724	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC30D11.04c	dsc2	nup124	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.264752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532645	2542884	2539743	279329	276295	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC16A3.08c	dsc2	oga1	ucp14	SPBC16A3.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.19872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532646	2542884	2542946	279329	279386	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC6F12.03c	dsc2	fsv1	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.187826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532647	2542884	2539051	279329	275624	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC1183.11	dsc2	msy1	ucp14	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.054095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532648	2542884	2540524	279329	277052	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC21B10.08c	dsc2	SPBC21B10.08c	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.023167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532649	2542884	2539302	279329	275870	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC126.09	dsc2	zip2	ucp14	SPCC126.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.018676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532650	2542884	2543637	279329	280051	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC3H8.02	dsc2	csr102	ucp14	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.878545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532651	2542884	2539651	279329	276206	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC12D12.06	dsc2	srb11	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.418051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532652	2542884	2542863	279329	279309	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC13G7.04c	dsc2	mac1	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.307006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532653	2542884	2541678	279329	278174	SPAC1486.02c	SPAP7G5.05	dsc2	rpl1002	ucp14	rpl10|rpl10-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.10733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532654	2542884	2542357	279329	278822	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC1782.07	dsc2	qcr8	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.052014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532655	2542884	2539893	279329	276439	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC1539.10	dsc2	nop16	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.032376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532656	2542884	2539427	279329	275992	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC663.15c	dsc2	SPCC663.15c	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.988283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532657	2542884	2543593	279329	280008	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC4G9.10	dsc2	arg3	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.981582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532658	2542884	2538698	279329	275283	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC1442.02	dsc2	SPCC1442.02	ucp14	SPCC1450.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.881454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532659	2542884	2539865	279329	276412	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC17G9.08c	dsc2	cnt5	ucp14	csx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.880577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532660	2542884	2542220	279329	278694	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC1A6.03c	dsc2	SPAC1A6.03c	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.845102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532661	2542884	2540263	279329	276794	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC32H8.02c	dsc2	nep2	ucp14	mug120|pi021|SPACTOKYO_453.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.732246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532662	2542884	2539035	279329	275608	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC794.09c	dsc2	tef101	ucp14	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.603489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532663	2542884	2541175	279329	277689	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC839.13c	dsc2	rpl1601	ucp14	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.431218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532664	2542884	2541545	279329	278045	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC22F8.07c	dsc2	rtf1	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.420863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532665	2542884	2542759	279329	279209	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC9G1.07	dsc2	SPAC9G1.07	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532666	2542884	2542614	279329	279068	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC1399.04c	dsc2	SPAC1399.04c	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.375036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532667	2542884	2541475	279329	277977	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC24B11.09	dsc2	mpc2	ucp14	SPAC24B11.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.336354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532668	2542884	2542895	279329	279339	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC13G6.10c	dsc2	asl1	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.316503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532669	2542884	2539898	279329	276444	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC12D12.07c	dsc2	trx2	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.299491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532670	2542884	2543301	279329	279726	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC977.17	dsc2	SPAC977.17	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.291087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532671	2542884	2543030	279329	279466	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC12B10.10	dsc2	nod1	ucp14	SPAC12B10.10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.278654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532672	2542884	2542710	279329	279163	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC750.08c	dsc2	SPAC750.08c	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.247892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532673	2542884	2543024	279329	279460	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC1039.02	dsc2	SPAC1039.02	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.216567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532674	2542884	2543361	279329	279783	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC823.10c	dsc2	SPAC823.10c	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.079293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532675	2542884	2541053	279329	277568	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC56F2.10c	dsc2	alg5	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.878403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532676	2542884	2540152	279329	276688	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC12C2.03c	dsc2	SPBC12C2.03c	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.798006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532677	2542884	2539823	279329	276373	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC16A3.18	dsc2	cip1	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.788763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532678	2542884	2539213	279329	275783	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC285.10c	dsc2	SPCC285.10c	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.779657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532679	2542884	2539239	279329	275809	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC1020.10	dsc2	oca2	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.779415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532680	2542884	2542318	279329	278784	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC16C9.05	dsc2	cph1	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.72228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532681	2542884	2539576	279329	276136	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC794.01c	dsc2	zwf2	ucp14	SPCC794.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.664296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532682	2542884	2543044	279329	279479	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC3C7.12	dsc2	tip1	ucp14	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.646403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532683	2542884	2541558	279329	278057	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC1F7.08	dsc2	fio1	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.63316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532684	2542884	2542080	279329	278557	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC27D7.03c	dsc2	mei2	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.624676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532685	2542884	2542460	279329	278921	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC1F12.03c	dsc2	SPAC1F12.03c	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.61324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532686	2542884	2539958	279329	276502	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC1718.07c	dsc2	zfs1	ucp14	moc4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.605829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532687	2542884	2539310	279329	275877	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC285.17	dsc2	spp27	ucp14	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.601735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532688	2542884	2539010	279329	275583	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC31H12.04c	dsc2	rpl1202	ucp14	rpl12|rpl12-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.574723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532689	2542884	2541525	279329	278025	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC27D7.02c	dsc2	SPAC27D7.02c	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.564937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532690	2542884	2538774	279329	275356	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC162.06c	dsc2	SPCC162.06c	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.545705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532691	2542884	2542983	279329	279421	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC11D3.15	dsc2	SPAC11D3.15	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.516962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532692	2542884	2538769	279329	275352	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC126.04c	dsc2	sgf73	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.516509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532693	2542884	2542135	279329	278611	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC13A11.04c	dsc2	ubp8	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.502346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532694	2542884	2542875	279329	279320	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC13G7.02c	dsc2	ssa1	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.482077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532695	2542884	2542213	279329	278687	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC3G6.13c	dsc2	rpl4101	ucp14	rpl41-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.361643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532696	2542884	2542522	279329	278980	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC19A8.03	dsc2	ymr1	ucp14	SPAC19A8.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.356178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532697	2542884	2543552	279329	279969	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC4H3.12c	dsc2	SPAC4H3.12c	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.303467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532698	2542884	2542781	279329	279230	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC57A10.12c	dsc2	ura3	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.298583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532699	2542884	2542022	279329	278505	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC23A1.03	dsc2	apt1	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.298098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532700	2542884	2541183	279329	277697	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC725.14	dsc2	arg6	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.278158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532701	2542884	2541444	279329	277949	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC22H10.04	dsc2	ppa3	ucp14	SPAC22H10.04|ppg1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.224119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532702	2542884	2540061	279329	276599	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC119.12	dsc2	rud3	ucp14	SPBC119.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.217928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532703	2542884	2541323	279329	277835	SPAC1486.02c	SPBP35G2.14	dsc2	SPBP35G2.14	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.213773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532704	2542884	2540527	279329	277055	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC23G7.13c	dsc2	SPBC23G7.13c	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.213021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532705	2542884	2542442	279329	278904	SPAC1486.02c	SPACUNK12.02c	dsc2	cmk1	ucp14	CaMK-I|SPAC25D11.02C	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.205254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532706	2542884	2539147	279329	275719	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC622.12c	dsc2	gdh1	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.203558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532707	2542884	2543183	279329	279612	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC3A12.06c	dsc2	SPAC3A12.06c	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.183168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532708	2542884	2540501	279329	277029	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC27B12.11c	dsc2	pho7	ucp14	SPBC27B12.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.138274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532709	2542884	2539913	279329	276457	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC11G11.03	dsc2	mrt4	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.12533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532710	2542884	2539420	279329	275985	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC970.07c	dsc2	raf2	ucp14	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.115205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532711	2542884	2539538	279329	276100	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC364.06	dsc2	nap1	ucp14	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.093111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532712	2542884	2543090	279329	279523	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC1348.01	dsc2	SPBC1348.01	ucp14	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.089341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532713	2542884	2540208	279329	276741	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC9B6.03	dsc2	SPBC9B6.03	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.061988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532714	2542884	2540913	279329	277429	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC56F2.08c	dsc2	SPBC56F2.08c	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.023235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532715	2542884	2540043	279329	276581	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC1198.12	dsc2	mfr1	ucp14	SPBC660.02|fzr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.020391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532716	2542884	2538845	279329	275426	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC1235.13	dsc2	ght6	ucp14	meu12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532717	2542884	2542464	279329	278925	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC1A6.09c	dsc2	lag1	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.952752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532718	2542884	2540727	279329	277250	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC1921.03c	dsc2	mex67	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.924565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532719	2542884	2540665	279329	277190	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC83.02c	dsc2	rpl4302	ucp14	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.917891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532720	2542884	2538876	279329	275455	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC4B3.02c	dsc2	SPCC4B3.02c	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.897101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532721	2542884	2542040	279329	278521	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC212.01c	dsc2	SPAC212.01c	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.895817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532722	2542884	2543096	279329	279528	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC977.05c	dsc2	SPAC977.05c	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.880506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532723	2542884	2543437	279329	279857	SPAC1486.02c	SPAPB1A10.14	dsc2	pof15	ucp14	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.87633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532724	2542884	2540029	279329	276573	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC16A3.01	dsc2	spn3	ucp14	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.854141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532725	2542884	2542722	279329	279173	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC25H1.05	dsc2	meu29	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.820664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532726	2542884	3361560	279329	280636	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC14C4.09	dsc2	agn1	ucp14	SPAC14C4.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.808544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532727	2542884	2541611	279329	278108	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC1527.02	dsc2	sft2	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.800835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532728	2542884	2542200	279329	278675	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC19D5.01	dsc2	pyp2	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.799678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532729	2542884	2543220	279329	279648	SPAC1486.02c	SPAPB21F2.02	dsc2	SPAPB21F2.02	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.79496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532730	2542884	2543160	279329	279591	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC31A2.14	dsc2	bun107	ucp14	wdr48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.786989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532731	2542884	2539050	279329	275623	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC11E10.08	dsc2	rik1	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.786097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532732	2542884	2543515	279329	279933	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC4F10.14c	dsc2	btf3	ucp14	btt1|egd1|nac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532733	2542884	2542691	279329	279144	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC26H5.07c	dsc2	SPAC26H5.07c	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.774772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532734	2542884	2539463	279329	276026	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC550.11	dsc2	SPCC550.11	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.762682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532735	2542884	2543237	279329	279665	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC6B12.02c	dsc2	mus7	ucp14	mms22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.753927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532736	2542884	2542798	279329	279246	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC13C5.06c	dsc2	mug121	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.731591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532737	2542884	2541674	279329	278170	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC1556.07	dsc2	pmm1	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.724433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532738	2542884	2540492	279329	277020	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC2D10.13	dsc2	est1	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.716473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532739	2542884	2543577	279329	279992	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC4H3.05	dsc2	srs2	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532740	2542884	2540201	279329	276734	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC13A2.04c	dsc2	ptr2	ucp14	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532741	2542884	2543406	279329	279828	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC9.12c	dsc2	atp12	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.705579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532742	2542884	2541713	279329	278208	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC3A12.12	dsc2	atp11	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.697899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532743	2542884	2542881	279329	279326	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC13F5.03c	dsc2	gld1	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.676021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532744	2542884	2541664	279329	278160	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC2H10.01	dsc2	SPAC2H10.01	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.654857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532745	2542884	2543071	279329	279504	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC3C7.06c	dsc2	pit1	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532746	2542884	2539648	279329	276203	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC1198.08	dsc2	SPBC1198.08	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532747	2542884	2539792	279329	276342	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC1271.14	dsc2	SPBC1271.14	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532748	2542884	2539600	279329	276158	SPAC1486.02c	SPCP1E11.03	dsc2	mug170	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532749	2542884	2539159	279329	275731	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC1235.01	dsc2	SPCC1235.01	ucp14	SPCC320.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.627254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532750	2542884	2541357	279329	277868	SPAC1486.02c	SPBPB7E8.01	dsc2	SPBPB7E8.01	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.62377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532751	2542884	2540829	279329	277347	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC800.09	dsc2	sum2	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.604251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532752	2542884	2540333	279329	276863	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC21B10.07	dsc2	SPBC21B10.07	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.598066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532753	2542884	2540907	279329	277423	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC582.10c	dsc2	SPBC582.10c	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.590142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532754	2542884	2540929	279329	277445	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC354.03	dsc2	swd3	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532755	2542884	3361570	279329	280646	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC750.01	dsc2	SPAC750.01	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532756	2542884	3361375	279329	280451	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC212.06c	dsc2	SPAC212.06c	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.543643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532757	2542884	2543555	279329	279972	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC922.05c	dsc2	SPAC922.05c	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.532631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532758	2542884	2541709	279329	278204	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC3C7.02c	dsc2	pil2	ucp14	SPAC3C7.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.530433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532759	2542884	2542924	279329	279365	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC12B10.04	dsc2	pby1	ucp14	SPAC12B10.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.530122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532760	2542884	2543066	279329	279499	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC343.12	dsc2	rds1	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.500476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532761	2541990	2539743	278474	276295	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC16A3.08c	dsc3	oga1	-	SPBC16A3.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.385436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532762	2541990	2543253	278474	279681	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC8C9.05	dsc3	SPAC8C9.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.931766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532763	2541990	2539427	278474	275992	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC663.15c	dsc3	SPCC663.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.335861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532764	2541990	2541038	278474	277553	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC29A10.01	dsc3	ccr1	-	SPBC365.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.307181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532765	2541990	2540725	278474	277248	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC215.14c	dsc3	vps20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.535285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532766	2541990	2540527	278474	277055	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC23G7.13c	dsc3	SPBC23G7.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.506541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532767	2541990	2540828	278474	277346	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC4B4.06	dsc3	vps25	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.416883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532768	2541990	2540524	278474	277052	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC21B10.08c	dsc3	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.326433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532769	2541990	2543301	278474	279726	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC977.17	dsc3	SPAC977.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.138894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532770	2541990	2543521	278474	279939	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC4F8.01	dsc3	did4	-	SPAC644.03c|vps2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.898977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532771	2541990	2539249	278474	275819	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC1450.05c	dsc3	rox3	-	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.726903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532772	2541990	2541357	278474	277868	SPAC20H4.02	SPBPB7E8.01	dsc3	SPBPB7E8.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.394838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532773	2541990	2543453	278474	279873	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC3G9.03	dsc3	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.010632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532774	2541990	2541708	278474	278203	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC31A2.02	dsc3	trm112	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.76497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532775	2541990	2539857	278474	276404	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC1604.20c	dsc3	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.613766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532776	2541990	2542969	278474	279409	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC4G8.10	dsc3	gos1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.515008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532777	2541990	2539227	278474	275797	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC191.11	dsc3	inv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.462838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532778	2541990	2542543	278474	279000	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC30D11.11	dsc3	SPAC30D11.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.254194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532779	2541990	2541635	278474	278131	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC1556.01c	dsc3	rad50	-	SPAP4C9.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.091789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532780	2541990	2540665	278474	277190	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC83.02c	dsc3	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.081143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532781	2541990	2539235	278474	275805	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC1682.15	dsc3	mug122	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.080892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532782	2541990	2539051	278474	275624	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC1183.11	dsc3	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.075065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532783	2541990	2540913	278474	277429	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC56F2.08c	dsc3	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.904251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532784	2541990	2542072	278474	278549	SPAC20H4.02	SPAP32A8.03c	dsc3	bop1	-	SPAP32A8.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.857116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532785	2541990	2539893	278474	276439	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC1539.10	dsc3	nop16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.848481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532786	2541990	2540677	278474	277202	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC21B10.03c	dsc3	ath1	-	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.577068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532787	2541990	2538774	278474	275356	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC162.06c	dsc3	SPCC162.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.445038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532788	2541990	2542710	278474	279163	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC750.08c	dsc3	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.386098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532789	2541990	2543333	278474	279756	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC694.02	dsc3	SPAC694.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.792596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532790	2541990	2542753	278474	279203	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC1687.09	dsc3	SPAC1687.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.473649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532791	2541990	2540146	278474	276683	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC17A3.06	dsc3	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.454785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532792	2541990	2540930	278474	277446	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC354.10	dsc3	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.302169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532793	2541990	2539958	278474	276502	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC1718.07c	dsc3	zfs1	-	moc4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.216071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532794	2541990	2542254	278474	278724	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC30D11.04c	dsc3	nup124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.152095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532795	2541990	2543043	278474	279478	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC3F10.13	dsc3	ucp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.109787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532796	2541990	2540787	278474	277306	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC1921.07c	dsc3	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.015391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532797	2541990	2540776	278474	277296	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC428.07	dsc3	meu6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.961241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532798	2541990	2543637	278474	280051	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC3H8.02	dsc3	csr102	-	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.873495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532799	2541990	2542255	278474	278725	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC57A7.08	dsc3	pzh1	-	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.859118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532800	2541990	2538848	278474	275429	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC613.12c	dsc3	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.792825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532801	2541990	2539420	278474	275985	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC970.07c	dsc3	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.767585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532802	2541990	2539013	278474	275586	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC364.03	dsc3	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.751582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532803	2541990	2540714	278474	277237	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC19C2.04c	dsc3	ubp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.72723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532804	2541990	2542857	278474	279303	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC144.06	dsc3	apl5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.721524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532805	2541990	2541264	278474	277778	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC902.06	dsc3	mto2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.706632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532806	2541990	2540105	278474	276642	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC106.04	dsc3	ada1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.701197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532807	2541990	2539213	278474	275783	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC285.10c	dsc3	SPCC285.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.620364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532808	2541990	2542149	278474	278625	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC57A10.06	dsc3	mug15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.51778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532809	2541990	2542029	278474	278511	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC8E11.02c	dsc3	rad24	-	anr5|sam4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.515473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532810	2541990	2538703	278474	275287	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC613.08	dsc3	SPCC613.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.398363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532811	2541990	2543190	278474	279619	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC31F12.01	dsc3	zds1	-	SPAC637.14|mug88	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.397345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532812	2541990	2540829	278474	277347	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC800.09	dsc3	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.38499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532813	2541990	2540905	278474	277421	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC530.06c	dsc3	clu1	-	SPBC530.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.319016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532814	2541990	2538845	278474	275426	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC1235.13	dsc3	ght6	-	meu12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.297329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532815	2541990	2539930	278474	276474	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC1198.11c	dsc3	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.294879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532816	2541990	2540029	278474	276573	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC16A3.01	dsc3	spn3	-	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.261236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532817	2541990	2541556	278474	278055	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC6G9.10c	dsc3	sen1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.224742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532818	2541990	2543363	278474	279785	SPAC20H4.02	SPAPB24D3.09c	dsc3	pdr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.213058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532819	2541990	2543683	278474	280097	SPAC20H4.02	SPAPB1E7.04c	dsc3	SPAPB1E7.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.207984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532820	2541990	2542419	278474	278882	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC17G6.05c	dsc3	bro1	-	SPAC17G6.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.180937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532821	2541990	2539463	278474	276026	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC550.11	dsc3	SPCC550.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.114946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532822	2541990	2542120	278474	278596	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC6F6.13c	dsc3	SPAC6F6.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.044373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532823	2541990	2539302	278474	275870	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC126.09	dsc3	zip2	-	SPCC126.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.974257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532824	2541990	2540001	278474	276545	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC1289.13c	dsc3	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.957491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532825	2541990	2543236	278474	279664	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC8C9.04	dsc3	SPAC8C9.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.903546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532826	2541990	2542220	278474	278694	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC1A6.03c	dsc3	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.879133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532827	2541990	2542617	278474	279071	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC13A11.01c	dsc3	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.878504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532828	2541990	2541380	278474	277891	SPAC20H4.02	SPBPB2B2.13	dsc3	gal1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.759353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532829	2541990	2540086	278474	276624	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC16H5.12c	dsc3	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.758409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532830	2541990	2539010	278474	275583	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC31H12.04c	dsc3	rpl1202	-	rpl12|rpl12-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.754207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532831	2541990	2541774	278474	278268	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC22E12.05c	dsc3	rer1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.71915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532832	2541990	2543406	278474	279828	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC9.12c	dsc3	atp12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.662216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532833	2541990	2541439	278474	277944	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC22F8.11	dsc3	plc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.608073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532834	2541990	2540333	278474	276863	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC21B10.07	dsc3	SPBC21B10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.606582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532835	2541990	2542781	278474	279230	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC57A10.12c	dsc3	ura3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.590517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532836	2541990	2542762	278474	279212	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC167.06c	dsc3	mug143	-	SPAC57A7.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.559682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532837	2541990	3361403	278474	280479	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC27D7.12c	dsc3	but1	-	SPAC27D7.12|mug107|prx	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.509737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532838	2541990	2539684	278474	276239	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC16A3.16	dsc3	SPBC16A3.16	-	cwc27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.483721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532839	2541990	2541475	278474	277977	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC24B11.09	dsc3	mpc2	-	SPAC24B11.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.481686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532840	2541990	2540263	278474	276794	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC32H8.02c	dsc3	nep2	-	mug120|pi021|SPACTOKYO_453.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.481141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532841	2541990	2541552	278474	278051	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC1142.08	dsc3	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.448466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532842	2541990	2540373	278474	276902	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC2G2.05	dsc3	rpl1603	-	rpl16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.442657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532843	2541990	2538873	278474	275452	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC306.11	dsc3	SPCC306.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.34466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532844	2541990	2538801	278474	275382	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC285.13c	dsc3	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.338737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532845	2541990	2540764	278474	277284	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC19C7.02	dsc3	ubr1	-	SPBC32F12.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.32689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532846	2541990	2541621	278474	278118	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC29A4.17c	dsc3	SPAC29A4.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.32079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532847	2541990	2543036	278474	279471	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC3A12.03c	dsc3	meu34	-	mug145	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.275015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532848	2541990	2541205	278474	277719	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC839.02	dsc3	SPBC839.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.216321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532849	2541990	2539147	278474	275719	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC622.12c	dsc3	gdh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.211206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532850	2541990	2539600	278474	276158	SPAC20H4.02	SPCP1E11.03	dsc3	mug170	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.191466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532851	2541990	2541558	278474	278057	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC1F7.08	dsc3	fio1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.158349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532852	2541990	2542691	278474	279144	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC26H5.07c	dsc3	SPAC26H5.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.151877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532853	2541990	3361323	278474	280399	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC30D10.04	dsc3	swi3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.080122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532854	2541990	2542252	278474	278722	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC17A2.13c	dsc3	rad25	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.069632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532855	2541990	2542103	278474	278579	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC31G5.11	dsc3	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.053738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532856	2541990	2541525	278474	278025	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC27D7.02c	dsc3	SPAC27D7.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.051626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532857	2541990	2540201	278474	276734	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC13A2.04c	dsc3	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.045771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532858	2541990	2539939	278474	276483	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC11G11.01	dsc3	fis1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.043529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532859	2541990	2539870	278474	276416	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC1709.18	dsc3	tif452	-	SPBC409.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.033819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532860	2541990	2540357	278474	276886	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC2F12.05c	dsc3	SPBC2F12.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.02163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532861	2541990	2543096	278474	279528	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC977.05c	dsc3	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.01188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532862	2541990	2541611	278474	278108	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC1527.02	dsc3	sft2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.009895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532863	2541990	2540279	278474	276810	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC3B8.04c	dsc3	SPBC3B8.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.996591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532864	2541990	2538884	278474	275462	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC1393.08	dsc3	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.991429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532865	2541990	2543551	278474	279968	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC4G8.06c	dsc3	trm12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.989563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532866	2541990	2539035	278474	275608	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC794.09c	dsc3	tef101	-	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.979632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532867	2541990	2540208	278474	276741	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC9B6.03	dsc3	SPBC9B6.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.965824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532868	2541990	2539046	278474	275619	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC1223.12c	dsc3	meu10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.961054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532869	2541990	2539576	278474	276136	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC794.01c	dsc3	zwf2	-	SPCC794.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.931991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532870	2541990	2541026	278474	277541	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC337.09	dsc3	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.923013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532871	2541990	2543327	278474	279750	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC1D4.06c	dsc3	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.922371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532872	2541990	2539310	278474	275877	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC285.17	dsc3	spp27	-	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.899019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532873	2541990	2542357	278474	278822	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC1782.07	dsc3	qcr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.893859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532874	2541990	2541663	278474	278159	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC22G7.08	dsc3	ppk8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.889543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532875	2541990	2539129	278474	275701	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC338.14	dsc3	ado1	-	SPCC338.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.889417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532876	2541990	2543068	278474	279501	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC30D11.06c	dsc3	hfl1	-	SPAC30D11.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.888131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532877	2541990	2539990	278474	276534	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC1289.14	dsc3	SPBC1289.14	-	SPBC8E4.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.856626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532878	2541990	2541140	278474	277655	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC713.07c	dsc3	SPBC713.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.844419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532879	2541990	2542423	278474	278885	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC17G6.08	dsc3	pep7	-	vac1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.831001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532880	2541990	2540061	278474	276599	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC119.12	dsc3	rud3	-	SPBC119.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.818539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532881	2541990	2541009	278474	277524	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC428.04	dsc3	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.768766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532882	2541990	2539961	278474	276505	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC1198.09	dsc3	ubc16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.746488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532883	2541990	2543183	278474	279612	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC3A12.06c	dsc3	SPAC3A12.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.735237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532884	2541990	2542651	278474	279105	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC24C9.12c	dsc3	SPAC24C9.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.722157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532885	2541990	2538961	278474	275535	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC285.14	dsc3	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.702685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532886	2541990	2543220	278474	279648	SPAC20H4.02	SPAPB21F2.02	dsc3	SPAPB21F2.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.701307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532887	2541990	2542385	278474	278849	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC1805.02c	dsc3	etf2	-	SPAC1805.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.699628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532888	2541990	2540988	278474	277504	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC354.08c	dsc3	SPBC354.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.69891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532889	2541990	2540892	278474	277408	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC530.01	dsc3	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.624453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532890	2541990	2539519	278474	276081	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC364.05	dsc3	vps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.621799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532891	2541990	2542802	278474	279250	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC15E1.06	dsc3	vps29	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.609172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532892	2541990	3361569	278474	280645	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC186.04c	dsc3	SPAC186.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.597002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532893	2541990	2541522	278474	278023	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC23E2.01	dsc3	fep1	-	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.596193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532894	2541990	2540931	278474	277447	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC365.07c	dsc3	SPBC365.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.571068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532895	2541990	2541335	278474	277846	SPAC20H4.02	SPBP4G3.03	dsc3	SPBP4G3.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.542841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532896	2541990	2541664	278474	278160	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC2H10.01	dsc3	SPAC2H10.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.534825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532897	2541990	2542643	278474	279097	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC2C4.07c	dsc3	dis32	-	SPAC2C4.07c|dis3L2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.533311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532898	2541990	2542946	278474	279386	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC6F12.03c	dsc3	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.511668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532899	2541990	2539334	278474	275900	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC285.05	dsc3	SPCC285.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.510251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532900	2541990	2539085	278474	275657	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC285.15c	dsc3	rps2802	-	rps28|rps28-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.504209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532901	2541990	2540837	278474	277355	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC18H10.08c	dsc3	ubp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.498271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532902	2541990	2543641	278474	280055	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC3H5.08c	dsc3	SPAC3H5.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.489933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532903	2541990	2543670	278474	280084	SPAC20H4.02	SPAPB1E7.06c	dsc3	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.474626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532904	2541990	2540043	278474	276581	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC1198.12	dsc3	mfr1	-	SPBC660.02|fzr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.45988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532905	2541990	2538756	278474	275339	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC1795.10c	dsc3	SPCC1795.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.427542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532906	2541990	2538916	278474	275493	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC16C4.17	dsc3	mug123	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.419601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532907	2541990	2540152	278474	276688	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC12C2.03c	dsc3	SPBC12C2.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.404633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532908	2541990	2540335	278474	276865	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC30B4.03c	dsc3	adn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.39132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532909	2541990	2540026	278474	276570	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC16D10.08c	dsc3	hsp104	-	SPBC16D10.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.381089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532910	2541990	2542289	278474	278757	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC17G6.03	dsc3	SPAC17G6.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.369005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532911	2541990	2539648	278474	276203	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC1198.08	dsc3	SPBC1198.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.36763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532912	2541990	2542200	278474	278675	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC19D5.01	dsc3	pyp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.345349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532913	2541990	2543307	278474	279731	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC694.05c	dsc3	rps2502	-	rps25|rps25-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.325983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532914	2541990	2543193	278474	279622	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC3F10.11c	dsc3	abc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.322458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532915	2541990	2543495	278474	279914	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC513.03	dsc3	mfm2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532916	2541990	2541352	278474	277863	SPAC20H4.02	SPBPJ4664.03	dsc3	mfm3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.319798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532917	2541990	2542577	278474	279033	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC19G12.15c	dsc3	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.315971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532918	2541990	2542324	278474	278790	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC16E8.05c	dsc3	mde1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.297318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532919	2541990	2541062	278474	277577	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC660.11	dsc3	tcg1	-	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.293946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532920	2541990	2543208	278474	279637	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC328.04	dsc3	SPAC328.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.29294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532921	2541990	2541741	278474	278235	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC20G4.02c	dsc3	fus1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.289816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532922	2541990	2541323	278474	277835	SPAC20H4.02	SPBP35G2.14	dsc3	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.278348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532923	2541990	2541416	278474	277923	SPAC20H4.02	SPBCPT2R1.01c	dsc3	SPBCPT2R1.01c	-	SPBPB2B2.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.276159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532924	2541990	2542516	278474	278974	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC2F7.04	dsc3	pmc2	-	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.275483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532925	2541990	3361491	278474	280567	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC1805.08	dsc3	dlc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.264321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532926	2541990	2542890	278474	279334	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC13G6.14	dsc3	aps1	-	SPAC24B11.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532927	2541990	2541411	278474	277919	SPAC20H4.02	SPBPB2B2.12c	dsc3	gal10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.241358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532928	2541990	2542344	278474	278810	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC1751.01c	dsc3	gti1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.237296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532929	2541990	2542597	278474	279051	SPAC20H4.02	SPAP8A3.07c	dsc3	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.213512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532930	2541990	2542685	278474	279138	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC26A3.06	dsc3	bud23	-	SPAC26A3.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.19833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532931	2541990	2543515	278474	279933	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC4F10.14c	dsc3	btf3	-	btt1|egd1|nac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532932	2541990	2539000	278474	275574	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC1450.06c	dsc3	grx3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.175754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532933	2541990	2539335	278474	275901	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC1450.16c	dsc3	ptl1	-	SPCC1450.16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.172231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532934	2541990	2543024	278474	279460	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC1039.02	dsc3	SPAC1039.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.140863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532935	2541990	2541053	278474	277568	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC56F2.10c	dsc3	alg5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.12383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532936	2541990	2541096	278474	277611	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC725.10	dsc3	SPBC725.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.123539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532937	2541990	2542699	278474	279152	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC5H10.07	dsc3	SPAC5H10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.118366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532938	2541990	2539843	278474	276391	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC16G5.11c	dsc3	bag101	-	bag1|bag1-a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.116837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532939	2541990	2538796	278474	275377	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC63.06	dsc3	SPCC63.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.114655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532940	2541990	2541208	278474	277722	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC887.04c	dsc3	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.109005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532941	2541990	2541258	278474	277772	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC8E4.01c	dsc3	SPBC8E4.01c	-	SPBP4G3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.105933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532942	2541990	2541279	278474	277792	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC8E4.03	dsc3	SPBC8E4.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.099006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532943	2541990	2542983	278474	279421	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC11D3.15	dsc3	SPAC11D3.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.059504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532944	2541990	2538698	278474	275283	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC1442.02	dsc3	SPCC1442.02	-	SPCC1450.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532945	2541990	2539807	278474	276357	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC1778.10c	dsc3	ppk21	-	SPBC4C3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.034143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532946	2541990	2541082	278474	277597	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC577.11	dsc3	SPBC577.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.012924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532947	2541990	2543103	278474	279535	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC3F10.09	dsc3	SPAC3F10.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.003476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532948	2541990	2539237	278474	275807	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC24B10.13	dsc3	skb5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.002301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532949	2541990	2542418	278474	278881	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC1805.07c	dsc3	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.999792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532950	2541990	2541543	278474	278043	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC5H10.04	dsc3	SPAC5H10.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.996109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532951	2541990	2541229	278474	277743	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC839.05c	dsc3	rps1701	-	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.974533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532952	2541990	2540648	278474	277173	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC1921.05	dsc3	ape2	-	ape1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.973543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532953	2541990	2542594	278474	279048	SPAC20H4.02	SPACUNK4.10	dsc3	SPACUNK4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.97187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532954	2541990	2543064	278474	279497	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC3G6.01	dsc3	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.95038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532955	2541990	2541632	278474	278128	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC323.07c	dsc3	SPAC323.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.937227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532956	2541990	2543661	278474	280075	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC644.08	dsc3	SPAC644.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.93237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532957	2541990	2540779	278474	277298	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC19F8.06c	dsc3	meu22	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.927856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532958	2541990	2539178	278474	275749	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC1682.14	dsc3	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.914732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532959	2541990	2539239	278474	275809	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC1020.10	dsc3	oca2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.907928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532960	2541990	2539117	278474	275689	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC74.06	dsc3	mak3	-	phk2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.901077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532961	2541990	2538830	278474	275411	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC1393.13	dsc3	SPCC1393.13	-	prl64|SPNCRNA.64	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.89914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532962	2541990	2541104	278474	277619	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC6B1.03c	dsc3	SPBC6B1.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.894073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532963	2541990	2543029	278474	279465	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC11G7.01	dsc3	SPAC11G7.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.892591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532964	2541990	2541251	278474	277765	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC947.10	dsc3	dsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.89081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532965	2541990	2543651	278474	280065	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC644.11c	dsc3	pkp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.889367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532966	2541990	2539332	278474	275898	SPAC20H4.02	SPCPB1C11.01	dsc3	amt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.88787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532967	2541990	2540501	278474	277029	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC27B12.11c	dsc3	pho7	-	SPBC27B12.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.861747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532968	2541990	2540706	278474	277229	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC19C7.12c	dsc3	omh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.829737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532969	2541990	2541250	278474	277764	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC8D2.17	dsc3	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.818719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532970	2541990	2542541	278474	278998	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC1B3.03c	dsc3	wis2	-	cyp5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.80865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532971	2541990	2542244	278474	278714	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC19G12.13c	dsc3	poz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.804998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532972	2541990	2543633	278474	280047	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC3H8.05c	dsc3	mms1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.786424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532973	2541990	2543137	278474	279569	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC869.04	dsc3	SPAC869.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.785534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532974	2541990	2540727	278474	277250	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC1921.03c	dsc3	mex67	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.785153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532975	2541990	2541367	278474	277878	SPAC20H4.02	SPBP8B7.13	dsc3	vac7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532976	2541990	2540194	278474	276727	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC1709.09	dsc3	rrf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.756086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532977	2541990	2541867	278474	278357	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC22E12.14c	dsc3	sck2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.748332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532978	2541990	2542595	278474	279049	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC186.06	dsc3	SPAC186.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.741553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532979	2541990	2539071	278474	275643	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC1322.03	dsc3	trp1322	-	SPCC1322.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.73662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532980	2541990	2543638	278474	280052	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC3H8.09c	dsc3	nab3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.729036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532981	2541990	2542669	278474	279122	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC29B12.08	dsc3	clr5	-	SPAC29B12.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.726712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532982	2541990	2540147	278474	276684	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC16E9.07	dsc3	mug100	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.724924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532983	2541990	2542119	278474	278595	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC1834.08	dsc3	mak1	-	phk3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.724586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532984	2541990	2539913	278474	276457	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC11G11.03	dsc3	mrt4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.723657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532985	2541990	2542895	278474	279339	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC13G6.10c	dsc3	asl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532986	2541990	2540834	278474	277352	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC18H10.18c	dsc3	SPBC18H10.18c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.705972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532987	2541990	2541806	278474	278297	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC4G8.13c	dsc3	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.691812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532988	2541990	2539937	278474	276481	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC1539.08	dsc3	arf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.690145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532989	2541990	2542921	278474	279362	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC1093.01	dsc3	ppr5	-	SPAC12B10.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.688626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532990	2541990	2540990	278474	277506	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC36B7.06c	dsc3	mug20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.688457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532991	2541990	2542194	278474	278669	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC17G6.17	dsc3	pof8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.683108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532992	2541990	2538962	278474	275536	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC965.13	dsc3	SPCC965.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532993	2541990	2539497	278474	276060	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC895.07	dsc3	alp14	-	mtc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.676999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532994	2541990	2539208	278474	275778	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC1450.11c	dsc3	cek1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.667988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532995	2541990	2540044	278474	276582	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC1778.04	dsc3	spo6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.666235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532996	2541990	2539159	278474	275731	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC1235.01	dsc3	SPCC1235.01	-	SPCC320.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.661826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532997	2541990	2542611	278474	279065	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC29A4.05	dsc3	cam2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.624596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532998	2541990	2542934	278474	279375	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC10F6.07c	dsc3	mug94	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.616963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
532999	2541990	2540755	278474	277276	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC713.09	dsc3	SPBC713.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.60366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533000	2541990	2539846	278474	276394	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC17G9.10	dsc3	rpl1102	-	rpl11-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.593039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533001	2541990	2542055	278474	278534	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC6G9.03c	dsc3	mug183	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.58915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533002	2541990	2538876	278474	275455	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC4B3.02c	dsc3	SPCC4B3.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533003	2541990	2542428	278474	278890	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC1805.12c	dsc3	uep1	-	ubi2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533004	2541990	2540489	278474	277017	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC25H2.03	dsc3	SPBC25H2.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533005	2541990	2542355	278474	278820	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC29A4.13	dsc3	SPAC29A4.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533006	2541990	2540886	278474	277403	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC4F6.10	dsc3	vps901	-	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.560974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533007	2541990	2540523	278474	277051	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC29A10.10c	dsc3	dbl8	-	SPBC29A10.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.533785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533008	2541990	2541473	278474	277975	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC2C4.14c	dsc3	ppk11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.533474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533009	2541990	2542652	278474	279106	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC1687.15	dsc3	gsk3	-	skp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.523416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533010	2541990	2541678	278474	278174	SPAC20H4.02	SPAP7G5.05	dsc3	rpl1002	-	rpl10|rpl10-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.523311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533011	2541990	2542725	278474	279176	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC3A12.10	dsc3	rpl2001	-	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533012	2541990	2539538	278474	276100	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC364.06	dsc3	nap1	-	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533013	2541990	2543060	278474	279494	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC30C2.08	dsc3	SPAC30C2.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533014	2541990	2540099	278474	276637	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC16H5.11c	dsc3	skb1	-	rmt5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533015	2541990	2542566	278474	279022	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC8C9.12c	dsc3	SPAC8C9.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533016	2541990	2540686	278474	277211	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC21D10.10	dsc3	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.500728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533017	2543396	2540828	279818	277346	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC4B4.06	dsc4	vps25	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.61883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533018	2543396	2542403	279818	278867	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC19A8.05c	dsc4	sst4	-	vps27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.915994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533019	2543396	2540725	279818	277248	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC215.14c	dsc4	vps20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.238244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533020	2543396	2541038	279818	277553	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC29A10.01	dsc4	ccr1	-	SPBC365.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.124149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533021	2543396	2539169	279818	275740	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC1235.11	dsc4	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.149449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533022	2543396	2542080	279818	278557	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC27D7.03c	dsc4	mei2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.565726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533023	2543396	2541062	279818	277577	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC660.11	dsc4	tcg1	-	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.726052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533024	2543396	2541380	279818	277891	SPAC4D7.11	SPBPB2B2.13	dsc4	gal1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.429393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533025	2543396	2538792	279818	275373	SPAC4D7.11	SPCP1E11.10	dsc4	SPCP1E11.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.018647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533026	2543396	2539147	279818	275719	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC622.12c	dsc4	gdh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.997854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533027	2543396	2539427	279818	275992	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC663.15c	dsc4	SPCC663.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.234986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533028	2543396	2539235	279818	275805	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC1682.15	dsc4	mug122	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.996177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533029	2543396	2540208	279818	276741	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC9B6.03	dsc4	SPBC9B6.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.889596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533030	2543396	2543683	279818	280097	SPAC4D7.11	SPAPB1E7.04c	dsc4	SPAPB1E7.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.858023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533031	2543396	2542254	279818	278724	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC30D11.04c	dsc4	nup124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.736503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533032	2543396	2542724	279818	279175	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC767.01c	dsc4	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.596429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533033	2543396	2541522	279818	278023	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC23E2.01	dsc4	fep1	-	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.526955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533034	2543396	2540029	279818	276573	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC16A3.01	dsc4	spn3	-	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.498672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533035	2543396	2542759	279818	279209	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC9G1.07	dsc4	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.250282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533036	2543396	5802929	279818	858067	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC1556.08c	dsc4	cbs2	-	SPAC1F12.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.097646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533037	2543396	2543495	279818	279914	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC513.03	dsc4	mfm2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.080305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533038	2543396	2540524	279818	277052	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC21B10.08c	dsc4	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.982396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533039	2543396	2542946	279818	279386	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC6F12.03c	dsc4	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.840098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533040	2543396	2539310	279818	275877	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC285.17	dsc4	spp27	-	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.813127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533041	2543396	2543637	279818	280051	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC3H8.02	dsc4	csr102	-	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.765702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533042	2543396	2543361	279818	279783	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC823.10c	dsc4	SPAC823.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.687831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533043	2543396	2542220	279818	278694	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC1A6.03c	dsc4	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.618872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533044	2543396	2539213	279818	275783	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC285.10c	dsc4	SPCC285.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.517708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533045	2543396	2541015	279818	277530	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC409.08	dsc4	SPBC409.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.496666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533046	2543396	2543521	279818	279939	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC4F8.01	dsc4	did4	-	SPAC644.03c|vps2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.42321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533047	2543396	2542863	279818	279309	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC13G7.04c	dsc4	mac1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.337517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533048	2543396	2540001	279818	276545	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC1289.13c	dsc4	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.275866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533049	2543396	2539051	279818	275624	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC1183.11	dsc4	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.98048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533050	2543396	2542943	279818	279384	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC1348.03	dsc4	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.851645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533051	2543396	2540665	279818	277190	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC83.02c	dsc4	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.816126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533052	2543396	2542107	279818	278583	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC30.01c	dsc4	sec72	-	sec7b|sec702	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.712567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533053	2543396	2539105	279818	275677	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC1739.07	dsc4	cti1	-	lrp1|rrp47	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.712491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533054	2543396	2539538	279818	276100	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC364.06	dsc4	nap1	-	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.706295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533055	2543396	2541558	279818	278057	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC1F7.08	dsc4	fio1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.641931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533056	2543396	2542875	279818	279320	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC13G7.02c	dsc4	ssa1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.62429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533057	2543396	2539239	279818	275809	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC1020.10	dsc4	oca2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.593339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533058	2543396	2542614	279818	279068	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC1399.04c	dsc4	SPAC1399.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.503567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533059	2543396	2541525	279818	278025	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC27D7.02c	dsc4	SPAC27D7.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.474413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533060	2543396	2540333	279818	276863	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC21B10.07	dsc4	SPBC21B10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.412131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533061	2543396	2542895	279818	279339	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC13G6.10c	dsc4	asl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.405755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533062	2543396	2540905	279818	277421	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC530.06c	dsc4	clu1	-	SPBC530.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.372513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533063	2543396	2539159	279818	275731	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC1235.01	dsc4	SPCC1235.01	-	SPCC320.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.251695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533064	2543396	2542419	279818	278882	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC17G6.05c	dsc4	bro1	-	SPAC17G6.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533065	2543396	2542359	279818	278824	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC1782.11	dsc4	met14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.239805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533066	2543396	2542442	279818	278904	SPAC4D7.11	SPACUNK12.02c	dsc4	cmk1	-	CaMK-I|SPAC25D11.02C	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.223421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533067	2543396	2539182	279818	275753	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC16A11.16c	dsc4	rpn1302	-	rpn13|rpn13b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.217375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533068	2543396	2543043	279818	279478	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC3F10.13	dsc4	ucp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.189917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533069	2543396	2540263	279818	276794	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC32H8.02c	dsc4	nep2	-	mug120|pi021|SPACTOKYO_453.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.110483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533070	2543396	2543525	279818	279943	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC4A8.14	dsc4	SPAC4A8.14	-	prs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.091944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533071	2543396	2539035	279818	275608	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC794.09c	dsc4	tef101	-	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.067641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533072	2543396	2540787	279818	277306	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC1921.07c	dsc4	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.016195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533073	2543396	2543327	279818	279750	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC1D4.06c	dsc4	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.986865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533074	2543396	2541909	279818	278399	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC227.01c	dsc4	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.978131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533075	2543396	2539582	279818	276141	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC594.07c	dsc4	bqt3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.914972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533076	2543396	2542762	279818	279212	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC167.06c	dsc4	mug143	-	SPAC57A7.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.80675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533077	2543396	2539237	279818	275807	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC24B10.13	dsc4	skb5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.790585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533078	2543396	2539249	279818	275819	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC1450.05c	dsc4	rox3	-	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.779421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533079	2543396	3361517	279818	280593	SPAC4D7.11	SPAP11E10.02c	dsc4	mam3	-	SPAPB1A10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.746684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533080	2543396	2543236	279818	279664	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC8C9.04	dsc4	SPAC8C9.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.707394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533081	2543396	2542472	279818	278933	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC9E9.13	dsc4	wos2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.695093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533082	2543396	2539939	279818	276483	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC11G11.01	dsc4	fis1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.669351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533083	2543396	2541050	279818	277565	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC428.05c	dsc4	arg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.657282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533084	2543396	2543301	279818	279726	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC977.17	dsc4	SPAC977.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.632933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533085	2543396	2538774	279818	275356	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC162.06c	dsc4	SPCC162.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.601054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533086	2543396	2539815	279818	276365	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC1105.02c	dsc4	lys4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.536739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533087	2543396	2540519	279818	277047	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC21C3.14c	dsc4	SPBC21C3.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.523385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533088	2543396	2542029	279818	278511	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC8E11.02c	dsc4	rad24	-	anr5|sam4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.392691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533089	2543396	2540779	279818	277298	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC19F8.06c	dsc4	meu22	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.379133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533090	2543396	2539027	279818	275600	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC1322.08	dsc4	srk1	-	mkp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.295764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533091	2543396	3361269	279818	280345	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC31A8.01c	dsc4	rtn1	-	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.279611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533092	2543396	2539463	279818	276026	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC550.11	dsc4	SPCC550.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.263681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533093	2543396	2538873	279818	275452	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC306.11	dsc4	SPCC306.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.254755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533094	2543396	2538961	279818	275535	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC285.14	dsc4	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.212952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533095	2543396	2543437	279818	279857	SPAC4D7.11	SPAPB1A10.14	dsc4	pof15	-	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.201673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533096	2543396	2540516	279818	277044	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC21C3.01c	dsc4	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.201416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533097	2543396	2542165	279818	278641	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC1782.08c	dsc4	rex3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.122537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533098	2543396	2538756	279818	275339	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC1795.10c	dsc4	SPCC1795.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.110959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533099	2543396	2542707	279818	279160	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC25G10.03	dsc4	zip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.085127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533100	2543396	2541205	279818	277719	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC839.02	dsc4	SPBC839.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.076233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533101	2543396	2542983	279818	279421	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC11D3.15	dsc4	SPAC11D3.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.072931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533102	2543396	2541248	279818	277762	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC8D2.10c	dsc4	rmt3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.98821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533103	2543396	2540152	279818	276688	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC12C2.03c	dsc4	SPBC12C2.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.950511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533104	2543396	2539920	279818	276464	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC119.08	dsc4	pmk1	-	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.943808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533105	2543396	2539857	279818	276404	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC1604.20c	dsc4	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.88878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533106	2543396	2540201	279818	276734	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC13A2.04c	dsc4	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.881514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533107	2543396	2538801	279818	275382	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC285.13c	dsc4	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.833387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533108	2543396	2543220	279818	279648	SPAC4D7.11	SPAPB21F2.02	dsc4	SPAPB21F2.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.805519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533109	2543396	2543071	279818	279504	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC3C7.06c	dsc4	pit1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.801517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533110	2543396	2539421	279818	275986	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC794.11c	dsc4	ent3	-	SPCC794.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.796994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533111	2543396	2540565	279818	277092	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC1D7.04	dsc4	mlo3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.792655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533112	2543396	2539284	279818	275852	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC584.15c	dsc4	SPCC584.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.789826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533113	2543396	2543453	279818	279873	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC3G9.03	dsc4	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.784691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533114	2543396	2540829	279818	277347	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC800.09	dsc4	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.775953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533115	2543396	2539961	279818	276505	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC1198.09	dsc4	ubc16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.731065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533116	2543396	2539807	279818	276357	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC1778.10c	dsc4	ppk21	-	SPBC4C3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.724328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533117	2543396	2539958	279818	276502	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC1718.07c	dsc4	zfs1	-	moc4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.720115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533118	2543396	2540936	279818	277452	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC800.05c	dsc4	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.707363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533119	2543396	2541009	279818	277524	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC428.04	dsc4	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.651624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533120	2543396	2539600	279818	276158	SPAC4D7.11	SPCP1E11.03	dsc4	mug170	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.647564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533121	2543396	2540146	279818	276683	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC17A3.06	dsc4	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.627727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533122	2543396	2539743	279818	276295	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC16A3.08c	dsc4	oga1	-	SPBC16A3.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.605468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533123	2543396	2541931	279818	278419	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC6G9.16c	dsc4	SPAC6G9.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.57678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533124	2543396	3361030	279818	280106	SPAC4D7.11	SPCP20C8.03	dsc4	SPCP20C8.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.563783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533125	2543396	2542857	279818	279303	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC144.06	dsc4	apl5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.516318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533126	2543396	2540086	279818	276624	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC16H5.12c	dsc4	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.511465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533127	2543396	2540425	279818	276953	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC27.06c	dsc4	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.499589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533128	2543396	2539519	279818	276081	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC364.05	dsc4	vps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.475073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533129	2543396	2541411	279818	277919	SPAC4D7.11	SPBPB2B2.12c	dsc4	gal10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.46798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533130	2543396	2541923	279818	278411	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC23C4.09c	dsc4	SPAC23C4.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.466162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533131	2543396	2540714	279818	277237	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC19C2.04c	dsc4	ubp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.437395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533132	2543396	2542255	279818	278725	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC57A7.08	dsc4	pzh1	-	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.391303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533133	2543396	2542802	279818	279250	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC15E1.06	dsc4	vps29	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.384523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533134	2543396	2542357	279818	278822	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC1782.07	dsc4	qcr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.326948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533135	2543396	2541611	279818	278108	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC1527.02	dsc4	sft2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.314332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533136	2543396	2542769	279818	279219	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC15A10.10	dsc4	mde6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.307345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533137	2543396	2539812	279818	276362	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC1347.02	dsc4	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.298938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533138	2543396	2543203	279818	279632	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC323.04	dsc4	SPAC323.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.279548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533139	2543396	2539100	279818	275672	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC330.12c	dsc4	sdh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.26884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533140	2543396	2541416	279818	277923	SPAC4D7.11	SPBCPT2R1.01c	dsc4	SPBCPT2R1.01c	-	SPBPB2B2.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.229553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533141	2543396	2541543	279818	278043	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC5H10.04	dsc4	SPAC5H10.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.21093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533142	2543396	2538769	279818	275352	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC126.04c	dsc4	sgf73	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.205548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533143	2543396	2540776	279818	277296	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC428.07	dsc4	meu6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.175107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533144	2543396	2539593	279818	276151	SPAC4D7.11	SPCP20C8.01c	dsc4	SPCP20C8.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.170488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533145	2543396	2542781	279818	279230	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC57A10.12c	dsc4	ura3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.114398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533146	2543396	2542260	279818	278729	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC1F12.05	dsc4	SPAC1F12.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533147	2543396	2539227	279818	275797	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC191.11	dsc4	inv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.108783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533148	2543396	2540351	279818	276880	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC2G2.10c	dsc4	mug110	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.089781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533149	2543396	2538845	279818	275426	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC1235.13	dsc4	ght6	-	meu12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.086987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533150	2543396	2543096	279818	279528	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC977.05c	dsc4	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.075203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533151	2543396	2539245	279818	275815	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC1322.07c	dsc4	mug150	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.066163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533152	2543396	3361491	279818	280567	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC1805.08	dsc4	dlc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.053201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533153	2543396	2542252	279818	278722	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC17A2.13c	dsc4	rad25	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.037574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533154	2543396	2540726	279818	277249	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC216.01c	dsc4	psy2	-	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.033814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533155	2543396	2542516	279818	278974	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC2F7.04	dsc4	pmc2	-	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.025429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533156	2543396	2543060	279818	279494	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC30C2.08	dsc4	SPAC30C2.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.022187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533157	2543396	2539893	279818	276439	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC1539.10	dsc4	nop16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.996395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533158	2543396	2541279	279818	277792	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC8E4.03	dsc4	SPBC8E4.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.982768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533159	2543396	2541357	279818	277868	SPAC4D7.11	SPBPB7E8.01	dsc4	SPBPB7E8.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.982114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533160	2543396	2539898	279818	276444	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC12D12.07c	dsc4	trx2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.974301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533161	2543396	2540296	279818	276827	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC2D10.05	dsc4	exg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.944869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533162	2543396	2540026	279818	276570	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC16D10.08c	dsc4	hsp104	-	SPBC16D10.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.937313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533163	2543396	2542135	279818	278611	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC13A11.04c	dsc4	ubp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.918419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533164	2543396	2540498	279818	277026	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC27.02c	dsc4	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.904478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533165	2543396	2543044	279818	279479	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC3C7.12	dsc4	tip1	-	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.903067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533166	2543396	2543641	279818	280055	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC3H5.08c	dsc4	SPAC3H5.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.900091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533167	2543396	2538876	279818	275455	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC4B3.02c	dsc4	SPCC4B3.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.893829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533168	2543396	2542924	279818	279365	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC12B10.04	dsc4	pby1	-	SPAC12B10.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.888992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533169	2543396	2541793	279818	278284	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC22H10.02	dsc4	SPAC22H10.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.882249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533170	2543396	2542197	279818	278672	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC1142.01	dsc4	rqc1	-	SPAC1142.01|SPAC17G6.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.85467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533171	2543396	2540988	279818	277504	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC354.08c	dsc4	SPBC354.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.84069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533172	2543396	2542969	279818	279409	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC4G8.10	dsc4	gos1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.800112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533173	2543396	2543391	279818	279813	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC4G9.09c	dsc4	arg11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.791697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533174	2543396	2543066	279818	279499	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC343.12	dsc4	rds1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.790824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533175	2543396	2539913	279818	276457	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC11G11.03	dsc4	mrt4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.788025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533176	2543396	2542423	279818	278885	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC17G6.08	dsc4	pep7	-	vac1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533177	2543396	2541093	279818	277608	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC646.08c	dsc4	SPBC646.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.772656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533178	2543396	2539148	279818	275720	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC132.04c	dsc4	gdh2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.723879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533179	2543396	2539302	279818	275870	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC126.09	dsc4	zip2	-	SPCC126.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.722709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533180	2543396	2539208	279818	275778	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC1450.11c	dsc4	cek1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.721081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533181	2543396	2543616	279818	280030	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC4A8.09c	dsc4	cwf21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533182	2543396	2538866	279818	275446	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC1620.12c	dsc4	SPCC1620.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.697682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533183	2543396	2541615	279818	278112	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC27D7.11c	dsc4	SPAC27D7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.692765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533184	2543396	3361134	279818	280210	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC737.09c	dsc4	hmt1	-	SPCC74.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.69162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533185	2543396	2540341	279818	276870	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC2F12.11c	dsc4	rep2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.681892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533186	2543396	2542345	279818	278811	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC1705.02	dsc4	SPAC1705.02	-	SPAC1F2.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.654359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533187	2543396	2542370	279818	278834	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC1783.08c	dsc4	rpl1502	-	rpl15-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533188	2543396	2539050	279818	275623	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC11E10.08	dsc4	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.621683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533189	2543396	2541244	279818	277758	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC8D2.02c	dsc4	vps68	-	SPBC8D2.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.614918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533190	2543396	2542786	279818	279235	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC15A10.07	dsc4	SPAC15A10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.602198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533191	2543396	2543090	279818	279523	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC1348.01	dsc4	SPBC1348.01	-	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.599071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533192	2543396	2540647	279818	277172	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC18H10.07	dsc4	SPBC18H10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.590863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533193	2543396	2539937	279818	276481	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC1539.08	dsc4	arf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533194	2543396	2541439	279818	277944	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC22F8.11	dsc4	plc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533195	2543396	2538848	279818	275429	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC613.12c	dsc4	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533196	2543396	2539071	279818	275643	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC1322.03	dsc4	trp1322	-	SPCC1322.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.562936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533197	2543396	2540043	279818	276581	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC1198.12	dsc4	mfr1	-	SPBC660.02|fzr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.555184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533198	2543396	2542747	279818	279197	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC15A10.06	dsc4	SPAC15A10.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.539248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533199	2543396	2541104	279818	277619	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC6B1.03c	dsc4	SPBC6B1.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.534878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533200	2543396	2538945	279818	275519	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC1739.06c	dsc4	SPCC1739.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.529491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533201	2543396	2539823	279818	276373	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC16A3.18	dsc4	cip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533202	2540730	2541038	277253	277553	SPBC19C2.09	SPBC29A10.01	sre1	ccr1	-	SPBC365.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.443634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533203	2540730	2542273	277253	278742	SPBC19C2.09	SPAC17H9.13c	sre1	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.902713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533204	2540730	2541500	277253	278002	SPBC19C2.09	SPAC227.18	sre1	lys3	-	SPAC2F7.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.620632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533205	2540730	2539815	277253	276365	SPBC19C2.09	SPBC1105.02c	sre1	lys4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533206	2540730	2543096	277253	279528	SPBC19C2.09	SPAC977.05c	sre1	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.908915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533207	2540730	2540492	277253	277020	SPBC19C2.09	SPBC2D10.13	sre1	est1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.673096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533208	2540730	3361548	277253	280624	SPBC19C2.09	SPAC20G8.10c	sre1	atg6	-	SPAC3A12.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.671103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533209	2540730	2542184	277253	278659	SPBC19C2.09	SPAC17C9.13c	sre1	cut8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.395482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533210	2540730	2540692	277253	277217	SPBC19C2.09	SPBC800.07c	sre1	tsf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.394507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533211	2540730	2542867	277253	279312	SPBC19C2.09	SPAC343.16	sre1	lys2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.309069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533212	2540730	2539792	277253	276342	SPBC19C2.09	SPBC1271.14	sre1	SPBC1271.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.106088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533213	2540730	2538708	277253	275292	SPBC19C2.09	SPCC594.01	sre1	SPCC594.01	-	SPCC736.16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.099658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533214	2540730	2543391	277253	279813	SPBC19C2.09	SPAC4G9.09c	sre1	arg11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533215	2540730	2543593	277253	280008	SPBC19C2.09	SPAC4G9.10	sre1	arg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.909369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533216	2540730	2541963	277253	278449	SPBC19C2.09	SPAC21E11.04	sre1	aca1	-	ppr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.903107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533217	2540730	2540964	277253	277480	SPBC19C2.09	SPBC365.16	sre1	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.782045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533218	2540730	2542759	277253	279209	SPBC19C2.09	SPAC9G1.07	sre1	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.653696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533219	2540730	2540827	277253	277345	SPBC19C2.09	SPBC1921.06c	sre1	pvg3	-	mug49	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.648762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533220	2540730	2542032	277253	278514	SPBC19C2.09	SPAC23C11.04c	sre1	pnk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.59663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533221	2541044	2542554	277559	279011	SPBC354.05c	SPAC1952.03	sre2	otu2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.698745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533222	2541044	2539310	277559	275877	SPBC354.05c	SPCC285.17	sre2	spp27	-	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.02012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533223	2541044	2542168	277559	278643	SPBC354.05c	SPAC17A5.16	sre2	ftp105	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.743967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533224	2541044	2541806	277559	278297	SPBC354.05c	SPAC4G8.13c	sre2	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.53868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533225	2541044	2541439	277559	277944	SPBC354.05c	SPAC22F8.11	sre2	plc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.408969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533226	2541044	2538848	277559	275429	SPBC354.05c	SPCC613.12c	sre2	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.393359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533227	2541044	2538841	277559	275422	SPBC354.05c	SPCC550.03c	sre2	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.282949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533228	2541044	2540677	277559	277202	SPBC354.05c	SPBC21B10.03c	sre2	ath1	-	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.76537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533229	2541044	2539128	277559	275700	SPBC354.05c	SPCC1682.06	sre2	SPCC1682.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.315559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533230	2541044	2542288	277559	278756	SPBC354.05c	SPAC17G6.02c	sre2	tco1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.061149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533231	2541044	2543374	277559	279796	SPBC354.05c	SPAPB1A10.08	sre2	SPAPB1A10.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.86436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533232	2541044	2539958	277559	276502	SPBC354.05c	SPBC1718.07c	sre2	zfs1	-	moc4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.713887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533233	2541044	2538853	277559	275434	SPBC354.05c	SPCC1739.05	sre2	set5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.596687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533234	2541044	2542767	277559	279217	SPBC354.05c	SPAC1565.07c	sre2	knd1	-	SPAC1565.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.537122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533235	2541044	5802945	277559	858083	SPBC354.05c	SPAC19G12.16c	sre2	adg2	-	SPAC23A1.01c|mug46	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.501349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533236	2541044	2541678	277559	278174	SPBC354.05c	SPAP7G5.05	sre2	rpl1002	-	rpl10|rpl10-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.418885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533237	2541044	2538792	277559	275373	SPBC354.05c	SPCP1E11.10	sre2	SPCP1E11.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.381592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533238	2541044	2542056	277559	278535	SPBC354.05c	SPAC6G9.14	sre2	SPAC6G9.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.292129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533239	2541044	2538961	277559	275535	SPBC354.05c	SPCC285.14	sre2	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.248161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533240	2541044	2543453	277559	279873	SPBC354.05c	SPAC3G9.03	sre2	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.245383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533241	2541044	2542029	277559	278511	SPBC354.05c	SPAC8E11.02c	sre2	rad24	-	anr5|sam4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.191049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533242	2541044	2542614	277559	279068	SPBC354.05c	SPAC1399.04c	sre2	SPAC1399.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.884341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533243	2541044	2541545	277559	278045	SPBC354.05c	SPAC22F8.07c	sre2	rtf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.780913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533244	2541044	2542571	277559	279027	SPBC354.05c	SPAC589.02c	sre2	med13	-	spTrap240|srb9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.515861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533245	2541044	2543333	277559	279756	SPBC354.05c	SPAC694.02	sre2	SPAC694.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.493235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533246	2541044	2541627	277559	278123	SPBC354.05c	SPAC1F5.08c	sre2	yam8	-	ehs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.45968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533247	2541044	2543593	277559	280008	SPBC354.05c	SPAC4G9.10	sre2	arg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.405406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533248	2541044	2539169	277559	275740	SPBC354.05c	SPCC1235.11	sre2	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.309426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533249	2541044	2541909	277559	278399	SPBC354.05c	SPAC227.01c	sre2	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.184578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533250	2541044	2540995	277559	277511	SPBC354.05c	SPBC337.16	sre2	cho1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.167452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533251	2541044	2538993	277559	275567	SPBC354.05c	SPCC162.12	sre2	tco89	-	SPCC1753.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.087763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533252	2541044	2541183	277559	277697	SPBC354.05c	SPBC725.14	sre2	arg6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.892769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533253	2541044	2541156	277559	277671	SPBC354.05c	SPBC685.07c	sre2	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.892361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533254	2541044	2539420	277559	275985	SPBC354.05c	SPCC970.07c	sre2	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.81312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533255	2541044	2540492	277559	277020	SPBC354.05c	SPBC2D10.13	sre2	est1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.802088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533256	2541044	2540733	277559	277256	SPBC354.05c	SPBC4.01	sre2	dni2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.788756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533257	2541044	2540192	277559	276725	SPBC354.05c	SPBC1215.01	sre2	shy1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.777022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533258	2541044	2541357	277559	277868	SPBC354.05c	SPBPB7E8.01	sre2	SPBPB7E8.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.71202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533259	2541044	2539484	277559	276047	SPBC354.05c	SPCC594.04c	sre2	SPCC594.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.624251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533260	2541044	2540665	277559	277190	SPBC354.05c	SPBC83.02c	sre2	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.608151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533261	2541044	2539743	277559	276295	SPBC354.05c	SPBC16A3.08c	sre2	oga1	-	SPBC16A3.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.596455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533262	2541044	2539100	277559	275672	SPBC354.05c	SPCC330.12c	sre2	sdh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.568076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533263	2541044	2539249	277559	275819	SPBC354.05c	SPCC1450.05c	sre2	rox3	-	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.526445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533264	2541044	2540764	277559	277284	SPBC354.05c	SPBC19C7.02	sre2	ubr1	-	SPBC32F12.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.49697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533265	2541044	2541645	277559	278141	SPBC354.05c	SPAC1527.03	sre2	SPAC1527.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.486375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533266	2541044	2543327	277559	279750	SPBC354.05c	SPAC1D4.06c	sre2	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.455776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533267	2541044	2542072	277559	278549	SPBC354.05c	SPAP32A8.03c	sre2	bop1	-	SPAP32A8.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.411497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533268	2541044	2542103	277559	278579	SPBC354.05c	SPAC31G5.11	sre2	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.409123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533269	2541044	2542597	277559	279051	SPBC354.05c	SPAP8A3.07c	sre2	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.398511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533270	2541044	2541144	277559	277659	SPBC354.05c	SPBC685.06	sre2	rps001	-	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.343579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533271	2541044	2542273	277559	278742	SPBC354.05c	SPAC17H9.13c	sre2	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.315283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533272	2541044	2539046	277559	275619	SPBC354.05c	SPCC1223.12c	sre2	meu10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.293348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533273	2541044	2540279	277559	276810	SPBC354.05c	SPBC3B8.04c	sre2	SPBC3B8.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.269149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533274	2541044	2540647	277559	277172	SPBC354.05c	SPBC18H10.07	sre2	SPBC18H10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.244928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533275	2541044	2541720	277559	278214	SPBC354.05c	SPAC23H3.13c	sre2	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.224737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533276	2541044	2540146	277559	276683	SPBC354.05c	SPBC17A3.06	sre2	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.137349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533277	2541044	2542831	277559	279278	SPBC354.05c	SPAC20H4.08	sre2	whi2	-	SPAC20H4.08|SPAC145.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.099681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533278	2541044	2539937	277559	276481	SPBC354.05c	SPBC1539.08	sre2	arf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.096064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533279	2541044	2542759	277559	279209	SPBC354.05c	SPAC9G1.07	sre2	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.090239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533280	2541044	2543316	277559	279740	SPBC354.05c	SPAPJ691.02	sre2	SPAPJ691.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.082523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533281	2541044	2542324	277559	278790	SPBC354.05c	SPAC16E8.05c	sre2	mde1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.079881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533282	2541044	2542541	277559	278998	SPBC354.05c	SPAC1B3.03c	sre2	wis2	-	cyp5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.077057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533283	2541044	2539239	277559	275809	SPBC354.05c	SPCC1020.10	sre2	oca2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.06126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533284	2541044	2542577	277559	279033	SPBC354.05c	SPAC19G12.15c	sre2	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.019088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533285	2541044	2540913	277559	277429	SPBC354.05c	SPBC56F2.08c	sre2	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.990683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533286	2541044	2540587	277559	277113	SPBC354.05c	SPBC23G7.15c	sre2	rpp202	-	rpp2-2|rpa4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.98692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533287	2541044	2542006	277559	278489	SPBC354.05c	SPAC23A1.11	sre2	rpl1602	-	rpl16-2|rpl13a-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.983589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533288	2541044	2539427	277559	275992	SPBC354.05c	SPCC663.15c	sre2	SPCC663.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.974794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533289	2541044	2539588	277559	276146	SPBC354.05c	SPCC962.04	sre2	rps1201	-	rps12|rps12-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.944935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533290	2541044	2539302	277559	275870	SPBC354.05c	SPCC126.09	sre2	zip2	-	SPCC126.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.910648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533291	2541044	2543051	277559	279486	SPBC354.05c	SPAC1071.08	sre2	rpp203	-	rla6|rpp2-3|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.90956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533292	2541044	2543674	277559	280088	SPBC354.05c	SPAC637.13c	sre2	slm1	-	SPAC637.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.908674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533293	2541044	2540859	277559	277376	SPBC354.05c	SPBC4C3.09	sre2	SPBC4C3.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.906223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533294	2541044	2543495	277559	279914	SPBC354.05c	SPAC513.03	sre2	mfm2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.895132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533295	2541044	2541475	277559	277977	SPBC354.05c	SPAC24B11.09	sre2	mpc2	-	SPAC24B11.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.843401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533296	2541044	2541552	277559	278051	SPBC354.05c	SPAC1142.08	sre2	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.82636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533297	2541044	2540714	277559	277237	SPBC354.05c	SPBC19C2.04c	sre2	ubp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533298	2541044	2543670	277559	280084	SPBC354.05c	SPAPB1E7.06c	sre2	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.789775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533299	2541044	2539034	277559	275607	SPBC354.05c	SPCC830.10	sre2	ham1	-	SPCC830.10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.785135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533300	2541044	2542563	277559	279019	SPBC354.05c	SPAC1952.11c	sre2	ure2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.774511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533301	2541044	2543301	277559	279726	SPBC354.05c	SPAC977.17	sre2	SPAC977.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.772179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533302	2541044	2539013	277559	275586	SPBC354.05c	SPCC364.03	sre2	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.770869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533303	2541044	2541931	277559	278419	SPBC354.05c	SPAC6G9.16c	sre2	SPAC6G9.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.764995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533304	2541044	2543514	277559	279932	SPBC354.05c	SPAC4D7.03	sre2	pop2	-	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.762854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533305	2541044	2543087	277559	279520	SPBC354.05c	SPAC30C2.04	sre2	SPAC30C2.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.715087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533306	2541044	2538756	277559	275339	SPBC354.05c	SPCC1795.10c	sre2	SPCC1795.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.714319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533307	2541044	2542421	277559	278884	SPBC354.05c	SPAC17G8.05	sre2	med20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.700822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533308	2541044	2541546	277559	278046	SPBC354.05c	SPAC14C4.07	sre2	SPAC14C4.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.684205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533309	2541044	2542649	277559	279103	SPBC354.05c	SPAC24C9.14	sre2	otu1	-	mug141	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.667496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533310	2541044	2540604	277559	277130	SPBC354.05c	SPBC25D12.05	sre2	trm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.649447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533311	2541044	2539651	277559	276206	SPBC354.05c	SPBC12D12.06	sre2	srb11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.648296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533312	2541044	2541335	277559	277846	SPBC354.05c	SPBP4G3.03	sre2	SPBP4G3.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.61504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533313	2541044	2542875	277559	279320	SPBC354.05c	SPAC13G7.02c	sre2	ssa1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.606475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533314	2541044	2541543	277559	278043	SPBC354.05c	SPAC5H10.04	sre2	SPAC5H10.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.605198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533315	2541044	2542401	277559	278865	SPBC354.05c	SPAC1142.02c	sre2	SPAC1142.02c	-	SPAC17G6.19c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.603104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533316	2541044	2538916	277559	275493	SPBC354.05c	SPCC16C4.17	sre2	mug123	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.592187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533317	2541044	2539576	277559	276136	SPBC354.05c	SPCC794.01c	sre2	zwf2	-	SPCC794.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.582598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533318	2541044	2541680	277559	278176	SPBC354.05c	SPAC22F8.09	sre2	rrp16	-	nop53	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.557407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533319	2541044	2541985	277559	278470	SPBC354.05c	SPAC20G8.04c	sre2	SPAC20G8.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.545483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533320	2541044	2541578	277559	278075	SPBC354.05c	SPAC25B8.05	sre2	deg1	-	SPAC25B8.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.544104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533321	2541044	2541149	277559	277664	SPBC354.05c	SPBC651.03c	sre2	gyp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.530212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533322	2541044	2539028	277559	275601	SPBC354.05c	SPCC1281.07c	sre2	SPCC1281.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.509874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533323	2541044	2541611	277559	278108	SPBC354.05c	SPAC1527.02	sre2	sft2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.479207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533324	2541044	2539309	277559	275876	SPBC354.05c	SPCC4G3.19	sre2	alp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.462878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533325	2541044	2539129	277559	275701	SPBC354.05c	SPCC338.14	sre2	ado1	-	SPCC338.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.438013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533326	2541044	2543044	277559	279479	SPBC354.05c	SPAC3C7.12	sre2	tip1	-	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.433447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533327	2541044	2542795	277559	279243	SPBC354.05c	SPAC9G1.05	sre2	aip1	-	SPAC9G1.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.415003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533328	2541044	2540565	277559	277092	SPBC354.05c	SPBC1D7.04	sre2	mlo3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.410602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533329	2541044	2543401	277559	279823	SPBC354.05c	SPAPB1A11.03	sre2	SPAPB1A11.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.381955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533330	2541044	2540751	277559	277273	SPBC354.05c	SPBC20F10.10	sre2	psl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.34613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533331	2541044	2539050	277559	275623	SPBC354.05c	SPCC11E10.08	sre2	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.344765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533332	2541044	2541558	277559	278057	SPBC354.05c	SPAC1F7.08	sre2	fio1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.344635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533333	2541044	2539682	277559	276237	SPBC354.05c	SPBC14C8.05c	sre2	meu17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.340447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533334	2541044	2542430	277559	278892	SPBC354.05c	SPAC17G6.06	sre2	rps2401	-	rps24|rps24-1|rps24a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.316324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533335	2541044	2542399	277559	278863	SPBC354.05c	SPAC1805.10	sre2	SPAC1805.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.31464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533336	2541044	2539865	277559	276412	SPBC354.05c	SPBC17G9.08c	sre2	cnt5	-	csx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.305358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533337	2541044	2542355	277559	278820	SPBC354.05c	SPAC29A4.13	sre2	SPAC29A4.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.303451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533338	2541044	2539763	277559	276314	SPBC354.05c	SPBC1861.05	sre2	SPBC1861.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.29916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533339	2541044	2543659	277559	280073	SPBC354.05c	SPAC922.07c	sre2	atd2	-	SPAC922.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.285096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533340	2541044	2543420	277559	279842	SPBC354.05c	SPAC3H1.04c	sre2	mdm31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.274114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533341	2541044	2541982	277559	278467	SPBC354.05c	SPAC23A1.06c	sre2	cmk2	-	mkp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.268026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533342	2541044	2541444	277559	277949	SPBC354.05c	SPAC22H10.04	sre2	ppa3	-	SPAC22H10.04|ppg1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.231541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533343	2541044	2543363	277559	279785	SPBC354.05c	SPAPB24D3.09c	sre2	pdr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.227707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533344	2541044	2538801	277559	275382	SPBC354.05c	SPCC285.13c	sre2	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.214897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533345	2541044	2543406	277559	279828	SPBC354.05c	SPAC9.12c	sre2	atp12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533346	2541044	2541708	277559	278203	SPBC354.05c	SPAC31A2.02	sre2	trm112	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.208733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533347	2541044	2543448	277559	279868	SPBC354.05c	SPAC3H5.07	sre2	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.208343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533348	2541044	2542886	277559	279331	SPBC354.05c	SPAC1486.01	sre2	SPAC1486.01	-	sod2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.20794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533349	2541044	2542976	277559	279414	SPBC354.05c	SPAC9E9.09c	sre2	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.195659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533350	2541044	2541536	277559	278036	SPBC354.05c	SPAC1071.02	sre2	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.194426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533351	2541044	2543577	277559	279992	SPBC354.05c	SPAC4H3.05	sre2	srs2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.193026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533352	2541044	2541019	277559	277534	SPBC354.05c	SPBC3B8.07c	sre2	dsd1	-	SDCB3B8.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.184797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533353	2541044	2542707	277559	279160	SPBC354.05c	SPAC25G10.03	sre2	zip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.145577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533354	2541044	2539421	277559	275986	SPBC354.05c	SPCC794.11c	sre2	ent3	-	SPCC794.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.125192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533355	2541044	2542007	277559	278490	SPBC354.05c	SPAC20H4.07	sre2	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.099271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533356	2541044	2543291	277559	279716	SPBC354.05c	SPAC9E9.04	sre2	SPAC9E9.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.078741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533357	2541044	2539531	277559	276093	SPBC354.05c	SPCC576.02	sre2	SPCC576.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.076078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533358	2541044	2541380	277559	277891	SPBC354.05c	SPBPB2B2.13	sre2	gal1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.038617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533359	2541044	2539679	277559	276234	SPBC354.05c	SPBC12C2.05c	sre2	bzz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.029708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533360	2541044	2543236	277559	279664	SPBC354.05c	SPAC8C9.04	sre2	SPAC8C9.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.007938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533361	2541044	2543190	277559	279619	SPBC354.05c	SPAC31F12.01	sre2	zds1	-	SPAC637.14|mug88	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.00173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533362	2541044	2539812	277559	276362	SPBC354.05c	SPBC1347.02	sre2	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.99033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533363	2541044	2542816	277559	279263	SPBC354.05c	SPAC4G8.11c	sre2	atp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.986818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533364	2541044	2539381	277559	275947	SPBC354.05c	SPCC1739.10	sre2	mug33	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533365	2541044	2543391	277559	279813	SPBC354.05c	SPAC4G9.09c	sre2	arg11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.976912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533366	2541044	2543091	277559	279524	SPBC354.05c	SPAC12G12.15	sre2	sif3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.943807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533367	2541044	2541955	277559	278442	SPBC354.05c	SPAC5D6.04	sre2	SPAC5D6.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.938748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533368	2541044	2543201	277559	279630	SPBC354.05c	SPAC3F10.15c	sre2	spo12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.937112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533369	2541044	2541248	277559	277762	SPBC354.05c	SPBC8D2.10c	sre2	rmt3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.924266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533370	2541044	2540491	277559	277019	SPBC354.05c	SPBC28E12.04	sre2	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.901798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533371	2541044	2542386	277559	278850	SPBC354.05c	SPAC1805.01c	sre2	ppk6	-	SPAPJ736.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.901166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533372	2541044	2539535	277559	276097	SPBC354.05c	SPCC364.01	sre2	cif1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.879956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533373	2541044	2539085	277559	275657	SPBC354.05c	SPCC285.15c	sre2	rps2802	-	rps28|rps28-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533374	2541044	2539148	277559	275720	SPBC354.05c	SPCC132.04c	sre2	gdh2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.847172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533375	2541044	2541316	277559	277828	SPBC354.05c	SPBP19A11.02c	sre2	SPBP19A11.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.822369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533376	2541044	2542917	277559	279358	SPBC354.05c	SPAC9E9.11	sre2	plr1	-	plr	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.790303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533377	2541044	2542839	277559	279285	SPBC354.05c	SPAC13G7.12c	sre2	SPAC13G7.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.786144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533378	2541044	2543046	277559	279481	SPBC354.05c	SPAC3C7.10	sre2	pex13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.777334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533379	2541044	2543096	277559	279528	SPBC354.05c	SPAC977.05c	sre2	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.774084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533380	2541044	2539841	277559	276389	SPBC354.05c	SPBC17D1.05	sre2	SPBC17D1.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533381	2541044	2540498	277559	277026	SPBC354.05c	SPBC27.02c	sre2	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.765961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533382	2541044	2543165	277559	279596	SPBC354.05c	SPAC343.07	sre2	mug28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.741775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533383	2541044	2539245	277559	275815	SPBC354.05c	SPCC1322.07c	sre2	mug150	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.733307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533384	2541044	2543683	277559	280097	SPBC354.05c	SPAPB1E7.04c	sre2	SPAPB1E7.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.733291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533385	2541044	2539999	277559	276543	SPBC354.05c	SPBC1734.15	sre2	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.72203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533386	2541044	2540201	277559	276734	SPBC354.05c	SPBC13A2.04c	sre2	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.687287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533387	2541044	2542568	277559	279024	SPBC354.05c	SPAC1952.02	sre2	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.677986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533388	2541044	2542080	277559	278557	SPBC354.05c	SPAC27D7.03c	sre2	mei2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.677177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533389	2541044	2543080	277559	279513	SPBC354.05c	SPAC3A11.10c	sre2	SPAC3A11.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.66872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533390	2541044	2541628	277559	278124	SPBC354.05c	SPAC110.02	sre2	pds5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.665497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533391	2541044	2539094	277559	275666	SPBC354.05c	SPCC330.02	sre2	rhp7	-	SPCC613.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.661076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533392	2541044	2542710	277559	279163	SPBC354.05c	SPAC750.08c	sre2	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.644781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533393	2541044	2539898	277559	276444	SPBC354.05c	SPBC12D12.07c	sre2	trx2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.619129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533394	2541044	2542498	277559	278957	SPBC354.05c	SPACUNK4.16c	sre2	SPACUNK4.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.611834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533395	2541044	2538769	277559	275352	SPBC354.05c	SPCC126.04c	sre2	sgf73	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.605384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533396	2541044	2542960	277559	279400	SPBC354.05c	SPAC1039.04	sre2	SPAC1039.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.603192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533397	2541044	2541112	277559	277627	SPBC354.05c	SPBC725.07	sre2	pex5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.601976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533398	2541044	2539438	277559	276001	SPBC354.05c	SPCC4B3.07	sre2	nro1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533399	2541044	2540463	277559	276991	SPBC354.05c	SPBC2F12.15c	sre2	pfa3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.555105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533400	2541044	2543381	277559	279803	SPBC354.05c	SPAC630.09c	sre2	mug58	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533401	2541044	2540200	277559	276733	SPBC354.05c	SPBC1709.06	sre2	dus2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533402	2541044	2542516	277559	278974	SPBC354.05c	SPAC2F7.04	sre2	pmc2	-	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.500537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
533403	2541044	2539462	277559	276025	SPBC354.05c	SPCC777.13	sre2	vps35	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Stewart EV (2011)	21504829	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.500257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants.  Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score >= 2.0 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score <= -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
534617	2541659	2539114	278155	275686	SPAC1F5.11c	SPCC1795.08c	tra2	vid21	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534618	2541659	2542412	278155	278876	SPAC1F5.11c	SPAC9G1.13c	tra2	swc4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534619	2541659	2540686	278155	277211	SPAC1F5.11c	SPBC21D10.10	tra2	bdc1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534620	2541659	2543454	278155	279874	SPAC1F5.11c	SPAC3G9.08	tra2	png1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534621	2541659	2539428	278155	275993	SPAC1F5.11c	SPCC830.05c	tra2	epl1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534622	2541659	2541318	278155	277830	SPAC1F5.11c	SPBP23A10.08	tra2	alp5	-	arp4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534623	2541659	2542278	278155	278747	SPAC1F5.11c	SPAC17G8.07	tra2	yaf9	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534624	2541659	2542157	278155	278633	SPAC1F5.11c	SPAC6F6.09	tra2	eaf6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534625	2541659	2539989	278155	276533	SPAC1F5.11c	SPBC16A3.19	tra2	eaf7	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534626	2541659	2543506	278155	279924	SPAC1F5.11c	SPAC637.12c	tra2	mst1	-	kat5	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534627	2541265	2540408	277779	276936	SPBP16F5.03c	SPBC25H2.11c	tra1	spt7	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534628	2541265	2540436	277779	276964	SPBP16F5.03c	SPBC28F2.10c	tra1	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534629	2541265	2539353	277779	275919	SPBP16F5.03c	SPCC5E4.03c	tra1	taf5	-	taf72	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534630	2541265	2539775	277779	276326	SPBP16F5.03c	SPBC14C8.17c	tra1	spt8	-	sep9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534631	2541265	2543675	277779	280089	SPBP16F5.03c	SPAC4D7.10c	tra1	spt20	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534632	2541265	2542513	277779	278971	SPBP16F5.03c	SPAC1952.05	tra1	gcn5	-	kat2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534633	2541265	2542135	277779	278611	SPBP16F5.03c	SPAC13A11.04c	tra1	ubp8	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534634	2541265	2540105	277779	276642	SPBP16F5.03c	SPBC106.04	tra1	ada1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534635	2541265	2539133	277779	275705	SPBP16F5.03c	SPCC16C4.18c	tra1	taf6	-	taf50	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534636	2541265	2539174	277779	275745	SPBP16F5.03c	SPCC24B10.08c	tra1	ada2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534637	2541265	2542785	277779	279234	SPBP16F5.03c	SPAC15A10.02	tra1	taf12	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534638	2541265	2538769	277779	275352	SPBP16F5.03c	SPCC126.04c	tra1	sgf73	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534639	2541265	2539570	277779	276130	SPBP16F5.03c	SPCC61.02	tra1	spt3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534640	2541265	2540787	277779	277306	SPBP16F5.03c	SPBC1921.07c	tra1	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534641	2541265	2540614	277779	277140	SPBP16F5.03c	SPBC21H7.02	tra1	taf10	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534642	2541265	2543133	277779	279565	SPBP16F5.03c	SPAC12G12.05c	tra1	taf9	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534643	2541265	3361397	277779	280473	SPBP16F5.03c	SPAC57A10.14	tra1	sgf11	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534644	2541265	3361305	277779	280381	SPBP16F5.03c	SPBC6B1.12c	tra1	sus1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534645	2541265	2539480	277779	276043	SPBP16F5.03c	SPCC622.13c	tra1	tti1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534646	2541265	2543639	277779	280053	SPBP16F5.03c	SPAC458.03	tra1	tel2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534647	2541265	2541077	277779	277592	SPBP16F5.03c	SPBC83.08	tra1	rvb2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534648	2541265	2543227	277779	279655	SPBP16F5.03c	SPAPB8E5.09	tra1	rvb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534649	2540105	2540408	276642	276936	SPBC106.04	SPBC25H2.11c	ada1	spt7	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534650	2540105	2540436	276642	276964	SPBC106.04	SPBC28F2.10c	ada1	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534651	2540105	2539353	276642	275919	SPBC106.04	SPCC5E4.03c	ada1	taf5	-	taf72	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534652	2540105	2539775	276642	276326	SPBC106.04	SPBC14C8.17c	ada1	spt8	-	sep9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534653	2540105	2543675	276642	280089	SPBC106.04	SPAC4D7.10c	ada1	spt20	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534654	2540105	2542513	276642	278971	SPBC106.04	SPAC1952.05	ada1	gcn5	-	kat2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534655	2540105	2542135	276642	278611	SPBC106.04	SPAC13A11.04c	ada1	ubp8	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534656	2540105	2540105	276642	276642	SPBC106.04	SPBC106.04	ada1	ada1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534657	2540105	2539133	276642	275705	SPBC106.04	SPCC16C4.18c	ada1	taf6	-	taf50	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534658	2540105	2539174	276642	275745	SPBC106.04	SPCC24B10.08c	ada1	ada2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534659	2540105	2542785	276642	279234	SPBC106.04	SPAC15A10.02	ada1	taf12	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534660	2540105	2538769	276642	275352	SPBC106.04	SPCC126.04c	ada1	sgf73	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534661	2540105	2539570	276642	276130	SPBC106.04	SPCC61.02	ada1	spt3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534662	2540105	2540787	276642	277306	SPBC106.04	SPBC1921.07c	ada1	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534663	2540105	2540614	276642	277140	SPBC106.04	SPBC21H7.02	ada1	taf10	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534664	2540105	2543133	276642	279565	SPBC106.04	SPAC12G12.05c	ada1	taf9	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534665	2540105	3361397	276642	280473	SPBC106.04	SPAC57A10.14	ada1	sgf11	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534666	2540105	3361305	276642	280381	SPBC106.04	SPBC6B1.12c	ada1	sus1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534667	2540105	2541077	276642	277592	SPBC106.04	SPBC83.08	ada1	rvb2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534668	2540105	2543227	276642	279655	SPBC106.04	SPAPB8E5.09	ada1	rvb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534669	2541265	2539771	277779	276322	SPBP16F5.03c	SPBC1604.17c	tra1	tti2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534670	2541265	2543255	277779	279683	SPBP16F5.03c	SPAC1006.02	tra1	asa1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
534672	2541265	2542513	277779	278971	SPBP16F5.03c	SPAC1952.05	tra1	gcn5	-	kat2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis	double mutants show de-repression of mating and meiosis	-	BIOGRID
534673	2541265	2542513	277779	278971	SPBP16F5.03c	SPAC1952.05	tra1	gcn5	-	kat2	Co-localization	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	ChIP	-	BIOGRID
534674	2541265	2540408	277779	276936	SPBP16F5.03c	SPBC25H2.11c	tra1	spt7	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	ChIP	-	BIOGRID
534675	2541265	2539775	277779	276326	SPBP16F5.03c	SPBC14C8.17c	tra1	spt8	-	sep9	Co-localization	physical	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	ChIP	-	BIOGRID
534826	854485	2540389	34697	276917	YOR308C	SPBC31E1.03	SNU66	hub1	-	ubl4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mishra SK (2011)	21614000	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
535019	2540473	2538963	277001	275537	SPBC30D10.10c	SPCC777.08c	tor1	bit61	-	SPCC777.08	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tatebe H (2010)	21625337	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
535035	2540027	852990	276571	33341	SPBC1734.14c	YGR098C	suc1	ESP1	p13	L000000584	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Hsu WS (2011)	21518961	284812	559292	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
535036	2540027	852457	276571	32859	SPBC1734.14c	YBR160W	suc1	CDC28	p13	CDK1|HSL5|SRM5|cyclin-dependent serine/threonine-protein kinase CDC28|L000000267	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Hsu WS (2011)	21518961	284812	559292	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
543797	2543565	2542967	279981	279407	SPAPB24D3.04c	SPAC12B10.12c	mag1	rhp41	-	rhp4a	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kanamitsu K (2011)	21670547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	MMS|triple mutant	-	BIOGRID
543798	2540646	2542967	277171	279407	SPBC23G7.11	SPAC12B10.12c	mag2	rhp41	-	rhp4a	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kanamitsu K (2011)	21670547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	MMS|triple mutant	-	BIOGRID
543799	2539473	2542967	276036	279407	SPCP25A2.02c	SPAC12B10.12c	rhp26	rhp41	-	rhp4a	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kanamitsu K (2011)	21670547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance|resistance to chemicals	MMS	-	BIOGRID
543800	2543510	2538760	279928	275343	SPAC30D11.07	SPCC970.01	nth1	rad16	-	rad10|rad20|swi9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kanamitsu K (2011)	21670547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	MMS	-	BIOGRID
543801	2543510	2539473	279928	276036	SPAC30D11.07	SPCP25A2.02c	nth1	rhp26	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kanamitsu K (2011)	21670547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	MMS	-	BIOGRID
543802	2543510	2543580	279928	279995	SPAC30D11.07	SPAC644.14c	nth1	rad51	-	rhp51	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kanamitsu K (2011)	21670547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	MMS	-	BIOGRID
543803	2539047	2539381	275620	275947	SPCC1223.06	SPCC1739.10	tea1	mug33	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
543865	2542611	2539659	279065	276214	SPAC29A4.05	SPBC146.13c	cam2	myo1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Sammons MR (2011)	21693583	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
543866	2541699	2542611	278195	279065	SPAP8A3.08	SPAC29A4.05	cdc4	cam2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sammons MR (2011)	21693583	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
543867	2541699	2542611	278195	279065	SPAP8A3.08	SPAC29A4.05	cdc4	cam2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sammons MR (2011)	21693583	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis	-	-	BIOGRID
543868	2541699	2541887	278195	278377	SPAP8A3.08	SPAC22E12.16c	cdc4	pik1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Sammons MR (2011)	21693583	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
543869	2542611	2541887	279065	278377	SPAC29A4.05	SPAC22E12.16c	cam2	pik1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Sammons MR (2011)	21693583	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
543870	2541699	2539513	278195	276075	SPAP8A3.08	SPCC645.05c	cdc4	myo2	-	rng5	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Sammons MR (2011)	21693583	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
543871	2540227	2539568	276759	276128	SPBC31F10.14c	SPCC663.05c	hip3	cia1	hir3	asf1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mizuki F (2011)	21559379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
543872	2539992	3361511	276536	280587	SPBC1289.04c	SPAC23C4.08	pob1	rho3	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nakano K (2011)	21401840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vacuolar transport:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	rho3 overexpression rescues vesicle trafficking defects caused by mutation of pob1-664	-	BIOGRID
544583	2543653	2540510	280067	277038	SPAPB1E7.10	SPBC2G5.07c	rpc17	rpc25	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Ehara H (2011)	21714024	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
544606	2540020	2540847	276564	277364	SPBC16D10.09	SPBC428.18	pcn1	cdt1	pcn	-	FRET	physical	Guarino E (2011)	21493688	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC)	-	BIOGRID
545001	3361036	2542139	280112	278615	SPCC320.13c	SPAC18G6.07c	ark1	mra1	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Koch A (2011)	21712547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
545002	3361036	2541270	280112	277784	SPCC320.13c	SPBC902.02c	ark1	ctf18	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	chl12	Biochemical Activity	physical	Koch A (2011)	21712547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
545003	3361036	2541276	280112	277790	SPCC320.13c	SPBC947.11c	ark1	elg1	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Koch A (2011)	21712547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
545004	3361036	2540470	280112	276998	SPCC320.13c	SPBC29A10.15	ark1	orc1	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	cdc30|orp1|rid1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Koch A (2011)	21712547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
545005	3361036	2539155	280112	275727	SPCC320.13c	SPCC1020.02	ark1	spc7	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Koch A (2011)	21712547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
545006	3361036	2538932	280112	275508	SPCC320.13c	SPCC31H12.03c	ark1	tho1	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	SPCC31H12.03c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Koch A (2011)	21712547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
545007	3361036	2542517	280112	278975	SPCC320.13c	SPACUNK4.14	ark1	mdb1	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Koch A (2011)	21712547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
545008	3361036	2540337	280112	276866	SPCC320.13c	SPBC28F2.11	ark1	hmo1	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	SPBC28F2.11	Biochemical Activity	physical	Koch A (2011)	21712547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
545009	3361036	3361470	280112	280546	SPCC320.13c	SPAC3G9.01	ark1	nsk1	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Koch A (2011)	21712547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
545010	3361036	2539953	280112	276497	SPCC320.13c	SPBC1709.11c	ark1	png2	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Koch A (2011)	21712547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
545011	2539155	2542004	275727	278487	SPCC1020.02	SPAC27F1.04c	spc7	nuf2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Koch A (2011)	21712547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	The temperature-sensitive nuf2-2 mutant combined with spc7-3A or -3D showed a synthetic growth defect.	-	BIOGRID
545012	2539087	2540470	275659	276998	SPCC1259.13	SPBC29A10.15	chk1	orc1	rad27	cdc30|orp1|rid1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Koch A (2011)	21712547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	The chk1 orc1-S6A S9A double mutants showed a synthetic growth defect in the presence of hydroxyurea (HU).	-	BIOGRID
545013	3361036	2539971	280112	276515	SPCC320.13c	SPBC1105.04c	ark1	cbp1	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	abp1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Koch A (2011)	21712547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	The temperature-sensitive ark1-T8 allele was used in the experiment.	-	BIOGRID
545014	3361036	2541496	280112	277998	SPCC320.13c	SPAC23D3.09	ark1	arp42	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	arp4	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Koch A (2011)	21712547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	The temperature-sensitive ark1-T8 allele was used in the experiment.	-	BIOGRID
545015	3361036	2539087	280112	275659	SPCC320.13c	SPCC1259.13	ark1	chk1	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	rad27	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Koch A (2011)	21712547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	The temperature-sensitive ark1-T8 allele was used in the experiment.	-	BIOGRID
545016	3361036	3361323	280112	280399	SPCC320.13c	SPBC30D10.04	ark1	swi3	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Koch A (2011)	21712547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	The temperature-sensitive ark1-T8 allele was used in the experiment.	-	BIOGRID
545017	2541889	2541889	278379	278379	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC2F7.03c	pom1	pom1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Hachet O (2011)	21703453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
545018	2541889	2541590	278379	278087	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC57A10.02	pom1	cdr2	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Hachet O (2011)	21703453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
545019	2541889	2539642	278379	276197	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC1706.01	pom1	tea4	-	wsh3	Two-hybrid	physical	Hachet O (2011)	21703453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
545020	2541889	2539642	278379	276197	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC1706.01	pom1	tea4	-	wsh3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hachet O (2011)	21703453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
545021	2541193	2539642	277707	276197	SPBC776.02c	SPBC1706.01	dis2	tea4	bws1|sds1	wsh3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hachet O (2011)	21703453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
545093	2543589	2540504	280004	277032	SPAC4F10.15c	SPBC24C6.10c	wsp1	dip1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Basu R (2011)	21620704	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
545094	2543589	2540504	280004	277032	SPAC4F10.15c	SPBC24C6.10c	wsp1	dip1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Basu R (2011)	21620704	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
545095	2543589	2540504	280004	277032	SPAC4F10.15c	SPBC24C6.10c	wsp1	dip1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Basu R (2011)	21620704	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution	coronin	-	BIOGRID
545101	2541940	2541940	278427	278427	SPAC27F1.02c	SPAC27F1.02c	cdc8	cdc8	fus4	fus4	Reconstituted Complex	physical	East DA (2011)	21658004	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
553826	2540051	2541738	276589	278232	SPBC32H8.12c	SPAC20G4.06c	act1	adf1	cps8|pi012	cof1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	McCullough BR (2011)	21723825	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
557148	2539087	2540541	275659	277068	SPCC1259.13	SPBC1A4.03c	chk1	top2	rad27	ptr11	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yadav S (2011)	21767457	284812	284812	High Throughput|Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
557157	2539087	2540541	275659	277068	SPCC1259.13	SPBC1A4.03c	chk1	top2	rad27	ptr11	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yadav S (2011)	21767457	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation	-	-	BIOGRID
557163	2540541	2539087	277068	275659	SPBC1A4.03c	SPCC1259.13	top2	chk1	ptr11	rad27	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yadav S (2011)	21767457	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle passage through START:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
557164	2540541	2539087	277068	275659	SPBC1A4.03c	SPCC1259.13	top2	chk1	ptr11	rad27	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Yadav S (2011)	21767457	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	survival rate in stationary phase:partial rescue	survival after arrest in G2	-	BIOGRID
558357	2540593	2542337	277119	278803	SPBC28E12.03	SPAC16E8.09	rga4	scd1	-	ral1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kelly FD (2011)	21849474	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	-	-	BIOGRID
558358	2540593	2542635	277119	279089	SPBC28E12.03	SPAC24H6.09	rga4	gef1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kelly FD (2011)	21849474	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	-	-	BIOGRID
558359	2540593	2541726	277119	278220	SPBC28E12.03	SPAC22H10.07	rga4	scd2	-	ral3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kelly FD (2011)	21849474	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	-	-	BIOGRID
558360	2541605	2542513	278102	278971	SPAC1F7.01c	SPAC1952.05	spt6	gcn5	SPAC694.07c	kat2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kiely CM (2011)	21844224	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	Deleting GCN5 and MST2 in a spt6-1 mutant partially rescues the silencing defect (gcn5 mst2 spt6-1 triple mutant).|Genetic complex.	-	BIOGRID
558361	2541605	2542170	278102	278645	SPAC1F7.01c	SPAC17G8.13c	spt6	mst2	SPAC694.07c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kiely CM (2011)	21844224	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	Deleting GCN5 and MST2 in a spt6-1 mutant partially rescues the silencing defect (gcn5 mst2 spt6-1 triple mutant).|Genetic complex.	-	BIOGRID
559509	3361521	2541122	280597	277637	SPAC1610.03c	SPBC646.06c	crp79	agn2	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559510	3361521	2541386	280597	277897	SPAC1610.03c	SPBP8B7.24c	crp79	atg8	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559511	3361521	2539146	280597	275718	SPAC1610.03c	SPCC191.07	crp79	cyc1	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559512	3361521	2539847	280597	276395	SPAC1610.03c	SPBC530.14c	crp79	dsk1	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559513	3361521	2541480	280597	277982	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC23D3.10c	crp79	eng2	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559514	3361521	2540031	280597	276574	SPAC1610.03c	SPBC1198.14c	crp79	fbp1	meu5	SPBC660.04c	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559515	3361521	2539939	280597	276483	SPAC1610.03c	SPBC11G11.01	crp79	fis1	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559516	3361521	2539974	280597	276518	SPAC1610.03c	SPBC32H8.07	crp79	git5	meu5	gpb1	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559517	3361521	2542881	280597	279326	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC13F5.03c	crp79	gld1	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559518	3361521	2539101	280597	275673	SPAC1610.03c	SPCC736.04c	crp79	gma12	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559519	3361521	2541233	280597	277747	SPAC1610.03c	SPBC8D2.01	crp79	gsk31	meu5	pi064	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559520	3361521	2542825	280597	279272	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC144.10c	crp79	gwt1	meu5	mug59	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559521	3361521	2540718	280597	277241	SPAC1610.03c	SPBC3H7.15	crp79	hhp1	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559522	3361521	2542634	280597	279088	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC24H6.04	crp79	hxk1	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559523	3361521	2543607	280597	280022	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC4F8.07c	crp79	hxk2	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559524	3361521	2539409	280597	275974	SPAC1610.03c	SPCC645.03c	crp79	isa1	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559525	3361521	2541879	280597	278369	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC1F8.05	crp79	isp3	meu5	meu4	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559526	3361521	2541199	280597	277713	SPAC1610.03c	SPBC839.08c	crp79	its8	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559527	3361521	2540466	280597	276994	SPAC1610.03c	SPBC3E7.15c	crp79	lac1	meu5	SPBC4F6.02c|mug83	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559528	3361521	2542178	280597	278653	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC17A5.04c	crp79	mde10	meu5	mug139	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559529	3361521	3361499	280597	280575	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC25H1.09	crp79	mde5	meu5	SPAC4A8.01|meu30	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559530	3361521	2540454	280597	276982	SPAC1610.03c	SPBC27.03	crp79	meu25	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559531	3361521	2542280	280597	278748	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC1A6.06c	crp79	meu31	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559532	3361521	2540776	280597	277296	SPAC1610.03c	SPBC428.07	crp79	meu6	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559533	3361521	2539749	280597	276301	SPAC1610.03c	SPBC16A3.13	crp79	meu7	meu5	aah4	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559534	3361521	2539506	280597	276069	SPAC1610.03c	SPCC63.04	crp79	mok14	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559535	3361521	2543134	280597	279566	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC4G9.05	crp79	mpf1	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559536	3361521	2541510	280597	278012	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC22A12.02c	crp79	mug103	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559537	3361521	2541435	280597	277940	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC2E1P5.02c	crp79	mug109	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559538	3361521	2540351	280597	276880	SPAC1610.03c	SPBC2G2.10c	crp79	mug110	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559539	3361521	2538723	280597	275307	SPAC1610.03c	SPCC31H12.06	crp79	mug111	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559540	3361521	2543144	280597	279576	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC3F10.05c	crp79	mug113	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559541	3361521	2542798	280597	279246	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC13C5.06c	crp79	mug121	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559542	3361521	2542860	280597	279306	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC8C9.09c	crp79	mug129	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559543	3361521	2541058	280597	277573	SPAC1610.03c	SPBC3H7.09	crp79	erf2	meu5	mug142	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559544	3361521	2543036	280597	279471	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC3A12.03c	crp79	meu34	meu5	mug145	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559545	3361521	2543381	280597	279803	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC630.09c	crp79	mug58	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559546	3361521	2541938	280597	278425	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC8C9.16c	crp79	mug63	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559547	3361521	2542933	280597	279374	SPAC1610.03c	SPAPYUG7.06	crp79	sdu1	meu5	mug67|hag1	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559548	3361521	2543218	280597	279646	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC56E4.05	crp79	mug69	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559549	3361521	2542020	280597	278503	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC5D6.09c	crp79	mug86	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559550	3361521	2543113	280597	279545	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC3F10.07c	crp79	erf4	meu5	mug91	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559551	3361521	2540153	280597	276689	SPAC1610.03c	SPBC146.11c	crp79	mug97	meu5	meu33	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559552	3361521	2543111	280597	279543	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC806.07	crp79	ndk1	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559553	3361521	2540263	280597	276794	SPAC1610.03c	SPBC32H8.02c	crp79	nep2	meu5	mug120|pi021|SPACTOKYO_453.14c	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559554	3361521	2539043	280597	275616	SPAC1610.03c	SPCC1235.08c	crp79	pdh1	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559555	3361521	2541129	280597	277644	SPAC1610.03c	SPBC713.11c	crp79	pmp3	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559556	3361521	2538844	280597	275425	SPAC1610.03c	SPCC1183.09c	crp79	pmp31	meu5	mug75	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559557	3361521	2538911	280597	275488	SPAC1610.03c	SPCC1442.12	crp79	pps1	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559558	3361521	2539494	280597	276057	SPAC1610.03c	SPCC4G3.08	crp79	psk1	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559559	3361521	2541503	280597	278005	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC22A12.01c	crp79	pso2	meu5	SPAC56F8.17c|snm1	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559560	3361521	2543529	280597	279947	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC4C5.02c	crp79	ryh1	meu5	hos1|sat7	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559561	3361521	2538951	280597	275525	SPAC1610.03c	SPCC297.03	crp79	ssp1	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559562	3361521	2541731	280597	278225	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC6G9.11	crp79	syb1	meu5	snc1	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559563	3361521	2538977	280597	275551	SPAC1610.03c	SPCC1020.06c	crp79	tal1	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559564	3361521	2540837	280597	277355	SPAC1610.03c	SPBC18H10.08c	crp79	ubp4	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559565	3361521	2541391	280597	277901	SPAC1610.03c	SPBC649.04	crp79	uvi15	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559566	3361521	2541406	280597	277914	SPAC1610.03c	SPBPB2B2.07c	crp79	SPBPB2B2.07c	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559567	3361521	2538854	280597	275435	SPAC1610.03c	SPCP1E11.05c	crp79	are2	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559568	3361521	2542594	280597	279048	SPAC1610.03c	SPACUNK4.10	crp79	SPACUNK4.10	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559569	3361521	2543115	280597	279547	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC977.06	crp79	SPAC977.06	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559570	3361521	2543474	280597	279894	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC959.05c	crp79	pdi4	meu5	SPAC959.05c|SPAC959.06c	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559571	3361521	2541008	280597	277523	SPAC1610.03c	SPBC83.11	crp79	pet2	meu5	SPBC83.11	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559572	3361521	2542427	280597	278889	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC6F6.12	crp79	SPAC6F6.12	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559573	3361521	2543385	280597	279807	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC4G9.12	crp79	SPAC4G9.12	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559574	3361521	2543523	280597	279941	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC4F10.16c	crp79	SPAC4F10.16c	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559575	3361521	2543128	280597	279560	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC3F10.06c	crp79	rit1	meu5	SPAC3F10.06c	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559576	3361521	2541911	280597	278401	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC212.04c	crp79	SPAC212.04c	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559577	3361521	2542040	280597	278521	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC212.01c	crp79	SPAC212.01c	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559578	3361521	2542505	280597	278963	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC1B2.03c	crp79	SPAC1B2.03c	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559579	3361521	2539049	280597	275622	SPAC1610.03c	SPCC11E10.09c	crp79	SPCC11E10.09c	meu5	SPCC188.01c	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559580	3361521	2539176	280597	275747	SPAC1610.03c	SPCC1827.02c	crp79	SPCC1827.02c	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559581	3361521	2540179	280597	276712	SPAC1610.03c	SPBC1773.08c	crp79	omh4	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559582	3361521	2539211	280597	275781	SPAC1610.03c	SPCC1739.08c	crp79	SPCC1739.08c	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559583	3361521	2538935	280597	275511	SPAC1610.03c	SPCC1682.11c	crp79	ctl1	meu5	SPCC1682.11c	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559584	3361521	2543177	280597	279607	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC1639.01c	crp79	SPAC1639.01c	meu5	SPAC806.09c	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559585	3361521	2542821	280597	279268	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC144.12	crp79	SPAC144.12	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559586	3361521	2542840	280597	279286	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC13G6.08	crp79	SPAC13G6.08	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559587	3361521	2543090	280597	279523	SPAC1610.03c	SPBC1348.01	crp79	SPBC1348.01	meu5	SPAC1348.01	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559588	3361521	2543477	280597	279897	SPAC1610.03c	SPAPB2B4.04c	crp79	SPAPB2B4.04c	meu5	pmc1	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559589	3361521	2541646	280597	278142	SPAC1610.03c	SPAC750.06c	crp79	SPAC750.06c	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559590	3361521	2540254	280597	276785	SPAC1610.03c	SPBC32F12.10	crp79	SPBC32F12.10	meu5	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2010)	20531409	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	TAP-tagged Meu5p was used to immunoprecipitate mRNA transcripts that were identified using DNA microarrays.	-	BIOGRID
559591	2542615	2539639	279069	276194	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBC106.09	cut20	cut4	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	apc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	The APC/C was purified from cells arrested in prometaphase using the nda3-KM311 cold-sensitive tubulin allele.	-	BIOGRID
559592	2542615	3361204	279069	280280	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBP23A10.04	cut20	apc2	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	The APC/C was purified from cells arrested in prometaphase using the nda3-KM311 cold-sensitive tubulin allele.	-	BIOGRID
559593	2542615	2542438	279069	278900	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC17C9.01c	cut20	nuc2	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	SPAC1851.01|apc3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	The APC/C was purified from cells arrested in prometaphase using the nda3-KM311 cold-sensitive tubulin allele.	-	BIOGRID
559594	2542615	2543355	279069	279777	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC959.09c	cut20	apc5	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	SPAP32A8.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	The APC/C was purified from cells arrested in prometaphase using the nda3-KM311 cold-sensitive tubulin allele.	-	BIOGRID
559595	2542615	2541592	279069	278089	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC6F12.15c	cut20	cut9	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	dre1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	The APC/C was purified from cells arrested in prometaphase using the nda3-KM311 cold-sensitive tubulin allele.	-	BIOGRID
559596	2542615	2542880	279069	279325	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC6F12.14	cut20	cut23	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	apc8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	The APC/C was purified from cells arrested in prometaphase using the nda3-KM311 cold-sensitive tubulin allele.	-	BIOGRID
559597	2542615	2540307	279069	276837	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBC1A4.01	cut20	apc10	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	SPBC1E8.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	The APC/C was purified from cells arrested in prometaphase using the nda3-KM311 cold-sensitive tubulin allele.	-	BIOGRID
559598	2542615	2543187	279069	279616	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC343.03	cut20	apc11	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	The APC/C was purified from cells arrested in prometaphase using the nda3-KM311 cold-sensitive tubulin allele.	-	BIOGRID
559599	2542615	2542045	279069	278526	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC23C11.12	cut20	hcn1	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	The APC/C was purified from cells arrested in prometaphase using the nda3-KM311 cold-sensitive tubulin allele.	-	BIOGRID
559600	2542615	2540285	279069	276816	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBC28E12.01c	cut20	apc13	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	SPBC9B6.12c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	The APC/C was purified from cells arrested in prometaphase using the nda3-KM311 cold-sensitive tubulin allele.	-	BIOGRID
559601	2542615	2542211	279069	278685	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC27D7.05c	cut20	apc14	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	omt1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	The APC/C was purified from cells arrested in prometaphase using the nda3-KM311 cold-sensitive tubulin allele.	-	BIOGRID
559602	2542615	2540655	279069	277180	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBC83.04	cut20	apc15	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	The APC/C was purified from cells arrested in prometaphase using the nda3-KM311 cold-sensitive tubulin allele.	-	BIOGRID
559603	2542615	2543222	279069	279650	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC821.08c	cut20	slp1	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	cdc20	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	The APC/C was purified from cells arrested in prometaphase using the nda3-KM311 cold-sensitive tubulin allele.	-	BIOGRID
559604	2542615	2540589	279069	277115	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBC20F10.06	cut20	mad2	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	The APC/C was purified from cells arrested in prometaphase using the nda3-KM311 cold-sensitive tubulin allele.	-	BIOGRID
559605	2542615	2539219	279069	275789	SPAC19G12.01c	SPCC1795.01c	cut20	mad3	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	SPCC895.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	The APC/C was purified from cells arrested in prometaphase using the nda3-KM311 cold-sensitive tubulin allele.	-	BIOGRID
559606	2539219	2542615	275789	279069	SPCC1795.01c	SPAC19G12.01c	mad3	cut20	SPCC895.02	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	The APC/C was purified from cells arrested in prometaphase using the nda3-KM311 cold-sensitive tubulin allele.	-	BIOGRID
559607	2539219	2539639	275789	276194	SPCC1795.01c	SPBC106.09	mad3	cut4	SPCC895.02	apc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	The APC/C was purified from cells arrested in prometaphase using the nda3-KM311 cold-sensitive tubulin allele.	-	BIOGRID
559608	2539219	3361204	275789	280280	SPCC1795.01c	SPBP23A10.04	mad3	apc2	SPCC895.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	The APC/C was purified from cells arrested in prometaphase using the nda3-KM311 cold-sensitive tubulin allele.	-	BIOGRID
559609	2539219	2542438	275789	278900	SPCC1795.01c	SPAC17C9.01c	mad3	nuc2	SPCC895.02	SPAC1851.01|apc3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	The APC/C was purified from cells arrested in prometaphase using the nda3-KM311 cold-sensitive tubulin allele.	-	BIOGRID
559610	2539219	2543355	275789	279777	SPCC1795.01c	SPAC959.09c	mad3	apc5	SPCC895.02	SPAP32A8.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	The APC/C was purified from cells arrested in prometaphase using the nda3-KM311 cold-sensitive tubulin allele.	-	BIOGRID
559611	2539219	2541592	275789	278089	SPCC1795.01c	SPAC6F12.15c	mad3	cut9	SPCC895.02	dre1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	The APC/C was purified from cells arrested in prometaphase using the nda3-KM311 cold-sensitive tubulin allele.	-	BIOGRID
559612	2539219	2542880	275789	279325	SPCC1795.01c	SPAC6F12.14	mad3	cut23	SPCC895.02	apc8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	The APC/C was purified from cells arrested in prometaphase using the nda3-KM311 cold-sensitive tubulin allele.	-	BIOGRID
559613	2539219	2540307	275789	276837	SPCC1795.01c	SPBC1A4.01	mad3	apc10	SPCC895.02	SPBC1E8.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	The APC/C was purified from cells arrested in prometaphase using the nda3-KM311 cold-sensitive tubulin allele.	-	BIOGRID
559614	2539219	2543187	275789	279616	SPCC1795.01c	SPAC343.03	mad3	apc11	SPCC895.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	The APC/C was purified from cells arrested in prometaphase using the nda3-KM311 cold-sensitive tubulin allele.	-	BIOGRID
559615	2539219	2542045	275789	278526	SPCC1795.01c	SPAC23C11.12	mad3	hcn1	SPCC895.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	The APC/C was purified from cells arrested in prometaphase using the nda3-KM311 cold-sensitive tubulin allele.	-	BIOGRID
559616	2539219	2540285	275789	276816	SPCC1795.01c	SPBC28E12.01c	mad3	apc13	SPCC895.02	SPBC9B6.12c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	The APC/C was purified from cells arrested in prometaphase using the nda3-KM311 cold-sensitive tubulin allele.	-	BIOGRID
559617	2539219	2542211	275789	278685	SPCC1795.01c	SPAC27D7.05c	mad3	apc14	SPCC895.02	omt1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	The APC/C was purified from cells arrested in prometaphase using the nda3-KM311 cold-sensitive tubulin allele.	-	BIOGRID
559618	2539219	2540655	275789	277180	SPCC1795.01c	SPBC83.04	mad3	apc15	SPCC895.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	The APC/C was purified from cells arrested in prometaphase using the nda3-KM311 cold-sensitive tubulin allele.	-	BIOGRID
559619	2539219	2543222	275789	279650	SPCC1795.01c	SPAC821.08c	mad3	slp1	SPCC895.02	cdc20	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	The APC/C was purified from cells arrested in prometaphase using the nda3-KM311 cold-sensitive tubulin allele.	-	BIOGRID
559620	2539219	2540589	275789	277115	SPCC1795.01c	SPBC20F10.06	mad3	mad2	SPCC895.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	The APC/C was purified from cells arrested in prometaphase using the nda3-KM311 cold-sensitive tubulin allele.	-	BIOGRID
559621	2539219	2542615	275789	279069	SPCC1795.01c	SPAC19G12.01c	mad3	cut20	SPCC895.02	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559622	2539219	2543222	275789	279650	SPCC1795.01c	SPAC821.08c	mad3	slp1	SPCC895.02	cdc20	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559623	2540589	2543222	277115	279650	SPBC20F10.06	SPAC821.08c	mad2	slp1	-	cdc20	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sczaniecka M (2008)	18556659	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559624	2541975	2541699	278460	278195	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAP8A3.08	cdc15	cdc4	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
559625	2541975	2542358	278460	278823	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC1782.09c	cdc15	clp1	-	flp1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
559626	2541975	2540112	278460	276649	SPAC20G8.05c	SPBC11C11.02	cdc15	imp2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
559627	2541975	2539513	278460	276075	SPAC20G8.05c	SPCC645.05c	cdc15	myo2	-	rng5	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
559628	2541975	2543576	278460	279991	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC4A8.05c	cdc15	myp2	-	myo3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
559629	2541975	2540024	278460	276568	SPAC20G8.05c	SPBP4H10.04	cdc15	ppb1	-	SPBC1346.01c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
559630	2541975	2543129	278460	279561	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC4F8.13c	cdc15	rng2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
559631	2541975	2541599	278460	278096	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC24B11.11c	cdc15	sid2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
559632	2541975	2540650	278460	277175	SPAC20G8.05c	SPBC244.01c	cdc15	sid4	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
559633	2541975	2541603	278460	278100	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC1F5.04c	cdc15	cdc12	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
559634	2541975	2542805	278460	279253	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC15A10.08	cdc15	ain1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
559635	2541975	2539205	278460	275775	SPAC20G8.05c	SPCC4B3.15	cdc15	mid1	-	dmf1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
559636	2541975	2543545	278460	279962	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC926.03	cdc15	rlc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
559637	2541030	2540112	277545	276649	SPBC337.08c	SPBC11C11.02	ubi4	imp2	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559638	2541975	2541203	278460	277717	SPAC20G8.05c	SPBC83.18c	cdc15	fic1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559639	2541975	2541203	278460	277717	SPAC20G8.05c	SPBC83.18c	cdc15	fic1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559640	2541203	2541975	277717	278460	SPBC83.18c	SPAC20G8.05c	fic1	cdc15	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559641	2541203	2541975	277717	278460	SPBC83.18c	SPAC20G8.05c	fic1	cdc15	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559642	2541203	2541975	277717	278460	SPBC83.18c	SPAC20G8.05c	fic1	cdc15	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559643	2541203	2540112	277717	276649	SPBC83.18c	SPBC11C11.02	fic1	imp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559644	2541203	2539048	277717	275621	SPBC83.18c	SPCC1223.08c	fic1	dfr1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559645	2541203	2542848	277717	279294	SPBC83.18c	SPAC9G1.03c	fic1	rpl3001	-	rpl30|rpl30-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559646	2541203	2541060	277717	277575	SPBC83.18c	SPBC56F2.09c	fic1	arg5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559647	2541203	2541695	277717	278191	SPBC83.18c	SPAC1F7.05	fic1	cdc22	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559648	2541203	2541203	277717	277717	SPBC83.18c	SPBC83.18c	fic1	fic1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559649	2541203	2540767	277717	277287	SPBC83.18c	SPBC19C2.07	fic1	fba1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559650	2541203	2540046	277717	276584	SPBC83.18c	SPBC1773.10c	fic1	nrs1	-	ded81	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559651	2541203	2540439	277717	276967	SPBC83.18c	SPBC31F10.06c	fic1	sar1	-	psr1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559652	2541203	2542868	277717	279313	SPBC83.18c	SPAC1420.02c	fic1	cct5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559653	2541203	2542028	277717	278510	SPBC83.18c	SPAC2F3.09	fic1	hem1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559654	2541203	2542078	277717	278555	SPBC83.18c	SPAC26A3.05	fic1	chc1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559655	2541203	2539812	277717	276362	SPBC83.18c	SPBC1347.02	fic1	fkbp39	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559656	2541203	2539592	277717	276150	SPBC83.18c	SPCC794.12c	fic1	mae2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559657	2541203	2542907	277717	279351	SPBC83.18c	SPAC1420.03	fic1	rpn501	-	rpn5|rpn5-a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559658	2541203	2541089	277717	277604	SPBC83.18c	SPBC646.09c	fic1	int6	-	yin6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559659	2541203	2541179	277717	277693	SPBC83.18c	SPBC6B1.08c	fic1	ofd1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559660	2541203	2540210	277717	276743	SPBC83.18c	SPBC9B6.04c	fic1	tuf1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559661	2541203	2540053	277717	276591	SPBC83.18c	SPBC106.06	fic1	cct4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559662	2541203	2542694	277717	279147	SPBC83.18c	SPAC26H5.10c	fic1	tif51	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559663	2541203	2543304	277717	279728	SPBC83.18c	SPAC6B12.12	fic1	tom70	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559664	2541203	2540112	277717	276649	SPBC83.18c	SPBC11C11.02	fic1	imp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559665	2540112	2541203	276649	277717	SPBC11C11.02	SPBC83.18c	imp2	fic1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559666	2541203	2540112	277717	276649	SPBC83.18c	SPBC11C11.02	fic1	imp2	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559667	2540112	2542805	276649	279253	SPBC11C11.02	SPAC15A10.08	imp2	ain1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
559668	2540112	2539513	276649	276075	SPBC11C11.02	SPCC645.05c	imp2	myo2	-	rng5	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
559669	2540112	2543576	276649	279991	SPBC11C11.02	SPAC4A8.05c	imp2	myp2	-	myo3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
559670	2540112	2540024	276649	276568	SPBC11C11.02	SPBP4H10.04	imp2	ppb1	-	SPBC1346.01c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
559671	2540112	2543129	276649	279561	SPBC11C11.02	SPAC4F8.13c	imp2	rng2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
559672	2540112	2541599	276649	278096	SPBC11C11.02	SPAC24B11.11c	imp2	sid2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
559673	2540112	2540650	276649	277175	SPBC11C11.02	SPBC244.01c	imp2	sid4	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
559674	2540112	2543526	276649	279944	SPBC11C11.02	SPAC4A8.15c	imp2	cdc3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
559675	2540112	2541699	276649	278195	SPBC11C11.02	SPAP8A3.08	imp2	cdc4	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
559676	2540112	2542358	276649	278823	SPBC11C11.02	SPAC1782.09c	imp2	clp1	-	flp1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
559677	2540112	2543545	276649	279962	SPBC11C11.02	SPAC926.03	imp2	rlc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
559678	2541975	2540856	278460	277373	SPAC20G8.05c	SPBC4F6.12	cdc15	pxl1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559679	2540856	2541975	277373	278460	SPBC4F6.12	SPAC20G8.05c	pxl1	cdc15	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559683	2540856	2541203	277373	277717	SPBC4F6.12	SPBC83.18c	pxl1	fic1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Roberts-Galbraith RH (2009)	19139265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
559745	2539781	2543351	276331	279773	SPBC106.10	SPAC8C9.03	pka1	cgs1	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gupta DR (2011)	21869531	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559746	2543351	2539781	279773	276331	SPAC8C9.03	SPBC106.10	cgs1	pka1	-	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gupta DR (2011)	21869531	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559747	2539659	2543589	276214	280004	SPBC146.13c	SPAC4F10.15c	myo1	wsp1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Arasada R (2011)	21885283	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
559748	2539679	2541975	276234	278460	SPBC12C2.05c	SPAC20G8.05c	bzz1	cdc15	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Arasada R (2011)	21885283	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
559749	2539679	2539659	276234	276214	SPBC12C2.05c	SPBC146.13c	bzz1	myo1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Arasada R (2011)	21885283	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
559750	2543589	2539679	280004	276234	SPAC4F10.15c	SPBC12C2.05c	wsp1	bzz1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Arasada R (2011)	21885283	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
559751	2541975	2539659	278460	276214	SPAC20G8.05c	SPBC146.13c	cdc15	myo1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Arasada R (2011)	21885283	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
559753	2539781	2543351	276331	279773	SPBC106.10	SPAC8C9.03	pka1	cgs1	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gupta DR (2011)	21879336	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559754	2543351	2539781	279773	276331	SPAC8C9.03	SPBC106.10	cgs1	pka1	-	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gupta DR (2011)	21879336	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559755	2539185	2541585	275756	278082	SPCC737.03c	SPAC14C4.05c	ima1	man1	-	heh2|mug61	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Hiraoka Y (2011)	21880100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	triple mutant	-	BIOGRID
559756	2542544	2541585	279001	278082	SPAC18G6.10	SPAC14C4.05c	lem2	man1	heh1	heh2|mug61	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Hiraoka Y (2011)	21880100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	triple mutant	-	BIOGRID
559757	2539185	2541585	275756	278082	SPCC737.03c	SPAC14C4.05c	ima1	man1	-	heh2|mug61	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hiraoka Y (2011)	21880100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	triple mutant	-	BIOGRID
559758	2542544	2541585	279001	278082	SPAC18G6.10	SPAC14C4.05c	lem2	man1	heh1	heh2|mug61	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hiraoka Y (2011)	21880100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	triple mutant	-	BIOGRID
559759	2539185	2541585	275756	278082	SPCC737.03c	SPAC14C4.05c	ima1	man1	-	heh2|mug61	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hiraoka Y (2011)	21880100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nuclear morphology|size of nucleus	-	-	BIOGRID
559760	2542544	2541585	279001	278082	SPAC18G6.10	SPAC14C4.05c	lem2	man1	heh1	heh2|mug61	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hiraoka Y (2011)	21880100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nuclear morphology|size of nucleus	-	-	BIOGRID
559761	2539185	2542544	275756	279001	SPCC737.03c	SPAC18G6.10	ima1	lem2	-	heh1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Hiraoka Y (2011)	21880100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
559762	2539185	2542544	275756	279001	SPCC737.03c	SPAC18G6.10	ima1	lem2	-	heh1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hiraoka Y (2011)	21880100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nuclear morphology|size of nucleus	-	-	BIOGRID
559763	2539914	2539914	276458	276458	SPBC12D12.01	SPBC12D12.01	sad1	sad1	SPBC16H5.01c	SPBC16H5.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Hiraoka Y (2011)	21880100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559764	2539914	2539185	276458	275756	SPBC12D12.01	SPCC737.03c	sad1	ima1	SPBC16H5.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Hiraoka Y (2011)	21880100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559765	2539914	2541585	276458	278082	SPBC12D12.01	SPAC14C4.05c	sad1	man1	SPBC16H5.01c	heh2|mug61	Two-hybrid	physical	Hiraoka Y (2011)	21880100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559766	2539914	2542544	276458	279001	SPBC12D12.01	SPAC18G6.10	sad1	lem2	SPBC16H5.01c	heh1	Two-hybrid	physical	Hiraoka Y (2011)	21880100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559767	2539185	2539914	275756	276458	SPCC737.03c	SPBC12D12.01	ima1	sad1	-	SPBC16H5.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Hiraoka Y (2011)	21880100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559768	2539185	2539185	275756	275756	SPCC737.03c	SPCC737.03c	ima1	ima1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Hiraoka Y (2011)	21880100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559769	2539185	2541585	275756	278082	SPCC737.03c	SPAC14C4.05c	ima1	man1	-	heh2|mug61	Two-hybrid	physical	Hiraoka Y (2011)	21880100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
559770	2539185	2542544	275756	279001	SPCC737.03c	SPAC18G6.10	ima1	lem2	-	heh1	Two-hybrid	physical	Hiraoka Y (2011)	21880100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
560068	2542628	2540620	279082	277146	SPAC24H6.06	SPBC4.04c	sld3	mcm2	mug175	cdc19|nda1	Two-hybrid	physical	Fukuura M (2011)	21593208	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
560069	2542628	2543281	279082	279708	SPAC24H6.06	SPAC23C4.18c	sld3	rad4	mug175	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Two-hybrid	physical	Fukuura M (2011)	21593208	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
560070	2542628	2541194	279082	277708	SPAC24H6.06	SPBC725.13c	sld3	psf2	mug175	bsh3|dre13	Two-hybrid	physical	Fukuura M (2011)	21593208	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
560071	2543310	2543281	279734	279708	SPAC6B12.11	SPAC23C4.18c	drc1	rad4	sld2	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Two-hybrid	physical	Fukuura M (2011)	21593208	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
560072	2542628	2543310	279082	279734	SPAC24H6.06	SPAC6B12.11	sld3	drc1	mug175	sld2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Fukuura M (2011)	21593208	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
560073	2539403	2540565	275968	277092	SPCC736.11	SPBC1D7.04	ago1	mlo3	csp9	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Reyes-Turcu FE (2011)	21892171	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution:partial rescue|silencing:partial rescue	Deletion of mlo3 partially restores heterochromatin formation in clr3 ago1 cells.	-	BIOGRID
560074	2539403	2540565	275968	277092	SPCC736.11	SPBC1D7.04	ago1	mlo3	csp9	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Reyes-Turcu FE (2011)	21892171	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	thiabendazole	-	BIOGRID
560075	2538930	2540565	275506	277092	SPCC188.13c	SPBC1D7.04	dcr1	mlo3	SPCC584.10c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Reyes-Turcu FE (2011)	21892171	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution:partial rescue|silencing:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
560076	2538930	2541941	275506	278428	SPCC188.13c	SPAC20H4.03c	dcr1	tfs1	SPCC584.10c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Reyes-Turcu FE (2011)	21892171	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution:partial rescue|silencing:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
560077	2538930	2540565	275506	277092	SPCC188.13c	SPBC1D7.04	dcr1	mlo3	SPCC584.10c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Reyes-Turcu FE (2011)	21892171	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	thiabendazole	-	BIOGRID
560078	2538930	2541941	275506	278428	SPCC188.13c	SPAC20H4.03c	dcr1	tfs1	SPCC584.10c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Reyes-Turcu FE (2011)	21892171	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	thiabendazole	-	BIOGRID
560079	2539403	2541941	275968	278428	SPCC736.11	SPAC20H4.03c	ago1	tfs1	csp9	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Reyes-Turcu FE (2011)	21892171	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution:partial rescue|silencing:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
560080	2539403	2541941	275968	278428	SPCC736.11	SPAC20H4.03c	ago1	tfs1	csp9	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Reyes-Turcu FE (2011)	21892171	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	thiabendazole	-	BIOGRID
560081	2540821	2540565	277339	277092	SPBC800.03	SPBC1D7.04	clr3	mlo3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Reyes-Turcu FE (2011)	21892171	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution	-	-	BIOGRID
560082	2539403	2541378	275968	277889	SPCC736.11	SPBP8B7.21	ago1	ubp3	csp9	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Reyes-Turcu FE (2011)	21892171	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution:partial rescue|silencing:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
560083	2540821	2540565	277339	277092	SPBC800.03	SPBC1D7.04	clr3	mlo3	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Reyes-Turcu FE (2011)	21892171	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution:partial rescue	Deletion of mlo3 partially restores heterochromatin formation in clr3 ago1 cells.	-	BIOGRID
560084	2539403	3361384	275968	280460	SPCC736.11	SPAC12G12.13c	ago1	cid14	csp9	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Reyes-Turcu FE (2011)	21892171	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:partial rescue|protein/peptide distribution:wild type|silencing:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
560085	2539403	2543630	275968	280044	SPCC736.11	SPAC1F3.01	ago1	rrp6	csp9	SPAC3H8.11	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Reyes-Turcu FE (2011)	21892171	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation|protein/peptide distribution	-	-	BIOGRID
560086	2539668	3361561	276223	280637	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC11E3.01c	pht1	swr1	pi001	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sadeghi L (2011)	21901086	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	MMS	-	BIOGRID
561353	2542796	2539164	279244	275735	SPAC1687.04	SPCC16A11.17	mcb1	mcm4	-	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ding L (2011)	21813639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
561354	2542796	2540784	279244	277303	SPAC1687.04	SPBC211.04c	mcb1	mcm6	-	mis5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ding L (2011)	21813639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
561355	2542796	2540630	279244	277156	SPAC1687.04	SPBC25D12.03c	mcb1	mcm7	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ding L (2011)	21813639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
561356	2542796	2538838	279244	275419	SPAC1687.04	SPCC1682.02c	mcb1	mcm3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ding L (2011)	21813639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
561357	2540620	2539164	277146	275735	SPBC4.04c	SPCC16A11.17	mcm2	mcm4	cdc19|nda1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ding L (2011)	21813639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
561358	2540620	2540784	277146	277303	SPBC4.04c	SPBC211.04c	mcm2	mcm6	cdc19|nda1	mis5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ding L (2011)	21813639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
561359	2540620	2540630	277146	277156	SPBC4.04c	SPBC25D12.03c	mcm2	mcm7	cdc19|nda1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ding L (2011)	21813639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
561360	2540620	2538838	277146	275419	SPBC4.04c	SPCC1682.02c	mcm2	mcm3	cdc19|nda1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ding L (2011)	21813639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
561363	2539164	2540620	275735	277146	SPCC16A11.17	SPBC4.04c	mcm4	mcm2	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	cdc19|nda1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ding L (2011)	21813639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
561364	2539164	2542796	275735	279244	SPCC16A11.17	SPAC1687.04	mcm4	mcb1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ding L (2011)	21813639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
561365	2539164	2540784	275735	277303	SPCC16A11.17	SPBC211.04c	mcm4	mcm6	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	mis5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ding L (2011)	21813639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
561366	2539164	2540630	275735	277156	SPCC16A11.17	SPBC25D12.03c	mcm4	mcm7	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ding L (2011)	21813639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
561367	2539164	2538838	275735	275419	SPCC16A11.17	SPCC1682.02c	mcm4	mcm3	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ding L (2011)	21813639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
561368	2540630	2540620	277156	277146	SPBC25D12.03c	SPBC4.04c	mcm7	mcm2	-	cdc19|nda1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ding L (2011)	21813639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
561369	2540630	2542796	277156	279244	SPBC25D12.03c	SPAC1687.04	mcm7	mcb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ding L (2011)	21813639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
561370	2540630	2539164	277156	275735	SPBC25D12.03c	SPCC16A11.17	mcm7	mcm4	-	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ding L (2011)	21813639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
561371	2540630	2540784	277156	277303	SPBC25D12.03c	SPBC211.04c	mcm7	mcm6	-	mis5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ding L (2011)	21813639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
561372	2540630	2538838	277156	275419	SPBC25D12.03c	SPCC1682.02c	mcm7	mcm3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ding L (2011)	21813639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
561865	2541326	2542150	277838	278626	SPBP35G2.03c	SPAC17A5.11	sgo1	rec12	-	spo11	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sakuno T (2011)	21920317	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation	-	-	BIOGRID
561866	2541326	2540458	277838	276986	SPBP35G2.03c	SPBC29A10.14	sgo1	rec8	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sakuno T (2011)	21920317	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation	-	-	BIOGRID
561878	2540348	2541620	276877	278117	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC2G11.12	exo1	rqh1	mut2	hus2|rad12|rec9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Langerak P (2011)	21931565	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	-	-	BIOGRID
561879	2542757	2541045	279207	277560	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC543.03c	mre11	pku80	rad32	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Langerak P (2011)	21931565	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	-	-	BIOGRID
561880	2538706	2541045	275290	277560	SPCC338.08	SPBC543.03c	ctp1	pku80	mug38|nip1|slr9	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Langerak P (2011)	21931565	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	-	-	BIOGRID
561883	2540348	2538706	276877	275290	SPBC29A10.05	SPCC338.08	exo1	ctp1	mut2	mug38|nip1|slr9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Langerak P (2011)	21931565	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	triple mutant	-	BIOGRID
561884	2541620	2538706	278117	275290	SPAC2G11.12	SPCC338.08	rqh1	ctp1	hus2|rad12|rec9	mug38|nip1|slr9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Langerak P (2011)	21931565	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	triple mutant	-	BIOGRID
561885	2540348	2542757	276877	279207	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC13C5.07	exo1	mre11	mut2	rad32	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Langerak P (2011)	21931565	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	triple mutant	-	BIOGRID
561886	2541620	2542757	278117	279207	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC13C5.07	rqh1	mre11	hus2|rad12|rec9	rad32	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Langerak P (2011)	21931565	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	triple mutant	-	BIOGRID
561888	2538706	2541045	275290	277560	SPCC338.08	SPBC543.03c	ctp1	pku80	mug38|nip1|slr9	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Langerak P (2011)	21931565	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance:wild type|resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
561889	2538706	2539090	275290	275662	SPCC338.08	SPCC126.02c	ctp1	pku70	mug38|nip1|slr9	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Langerak P (2011)	21931565	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance:wild type|resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
561890	2541045	2540348	277560	276877	SPBC543.03c	SPBC29A10.05	pku80	exo1	-	mut2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Langerak P (2011)	21931565	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Exo1 is required for pku80 to partially rescue mre11 ctp1 double mutants.	-	BIOGRID
561892	2542757	2541045	279207	277560	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC543.03c	mre11	pku80	rad32	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Langerak P (2011)	21931565	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution:partial rescue	RPA	-	BIOGRID
561893	2542757	2541045	279207	277560	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC543.03c	mre11	pku80	rad32	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Langerak P (2011)	21931565	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	HU|MMS	-	BIOGRID
561895	2542162	2539555	278638	276116	SPAC6F6.08c	SPCC4B3.08	cdc16	lsg1	bub2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Saberianfar R (2011)	21931816	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
561896	2541672	2539555	278168	276116	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC4B3.08	lsk1	lsg1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Saberianfar R (2011)	21931816	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
561897	2542795	2542358	279243	278823	SPAC9G1.05	SPAC1782.09c	aip1	clp1	SPAC9G1.05	flp1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Saberianfar R (2011)	21931816	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis	-	-	BIOGRID
563852	8290	2538711	113895	275295	-	SPCC1281.02c	HIST3H3	spf30	H3.4|H3/g|H3FT|H3t	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Yang Y (2010)	21172665	9606	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
565295	2542184	2542184	278659	278659	SPAC17C9.13c	SPAC17C9.13c	cut8	cut8	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Takeda K (2011)	21976488	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
565296	2542184	2542184	278659	278659	SPAC17C9.13c	SPAC17C9.13c	cut8	cut8	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Takeda K (2011)	21976488	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
565340	2541495	787581	277997	619929	SPAP8A3.02c	BOS_21904	ofd2	H2B	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Korvald H (2011)	21949882	284812	9913	Low Throughput	-	-	-	dot blot	-	BIOGRID
565341	2540618	2539579	277144	276138	SPBC3D6.11c	SPCP31B10.05	slx8	tdp1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Heideker J (2011)	21408210	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	camptothecin	-	BIOGRID
565342	2540618	2539579	277144	276138	SPBC3D6.11c	SPCP31B10.05	slx8	tdp1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Heideker J (2011)	21408210	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size|chromosome/plasmid maintenance	-	-	BIOGRID
565346	2539579	2540802	276138	277321	SPCP31B10.05	SPBC1921.02	tdp1	rad60	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Heideker J (2011)	21408210	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
565349	2539579	2540618	276138	277144	SPCP31B10.05	SPBC3D6.11c	tdp1	slx8	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Heideker J (2011)	21408210	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
565350	2539579	2540887	276138	277404	SPCP31B10.05	SPBC4F6.15c	tdp1	swi10	-	rad23	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Heideker J (2011)	21408210	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|resistance to chemicals	camptothecin	-	BIOGRID
565351	2539579	2543580	276138	279995	SPCP31B10.05	SPAC644.14c	tdp1	rad51	-	rhp51	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Heideker J (2011)	21408210	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|resistance to chemicals	camptothecin|triple mutant	-	BIOGRID
565352	2539579	2540618	276138	277144	SPCP31B10.05	SPBC3D6.11c	tdp1	slx8	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Heideker J (2011)	21408210	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	triple mutant	-	BIOGRID
565358	2539579	2540032	276138	276575	SPCP31B10.05	SPBC1703.14c	tdp1	top1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Heideker J (2011)	21408210	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viable	top1 rescues the lethality of the tdp1 swi10 mutant	-	BIOGRID
565359	2540887	2540032	277404	276575	SPBC4F6.15c	SPBC1703.14c	swi10	top1	rad23	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Heideker J (2011)	21408210	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viable	top1 rescues the lethality of the tdp1 swi10 mutant	-	BIOGRID
565360	2540887	2539579	277404	276138	SPBC4F6.15c	SPCP31B10.05	swi10	tdp1	rad23	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Heideker J (2011)	21408210	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
565361	2539579	2542757	276138	279207	SPCP31B10.05	SPAC13C5.07	tdp1	mre11	-	rad32	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Heideker J (2011)	21408210	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	camptothecin	-	BIOGRID
565362	2539579	2543580	276138	279995	SPCP31B10.05	SPAC644.14c	tdp1	rad51	-	rhp51	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Heideker J (2011)	21408210	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	camptothecin	-	BIOGRID
567447	2539666	2543010	276221	279448	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC10F6.09c	eso1	psm3	-	smc3	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kagami A (2011)	21979813	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
567448	2539666	2540368	276221	276897	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC36.05c	eso1	clr6	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kagami A (2011)	21979813	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
567449	2539666	2543010	276221	279448	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC10F6.09c	eso1	psm3	-	smc3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kagami A (2011)	21979813	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
567450	2542808	2540368	279256	276897	SPAC15E1.07c	SPBC36.05c	moa1	clr6	mug159	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kagami A (2011)	21979813	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
570112	2539838	2543281	276387	279708	SPBC1347.10	SPAC23C4.18c	cdc23	rad4	mcm10	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Two-hybrid	physical	Taylor M (2011)	21945095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
570113	2539838	2543281	276387	279708	SPBC1347.10	SPAC23C4.18c	cdc23	rad4	mcm10	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Taylor M (2011)	21945095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
570114	2543310	2543281	279734	279708	SPAC6B12.11	SPAC23C4.18c	drc1	rad4	sld2	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Two-hybrid	physical	Taylor M (2011)	21945095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
570115	2542628	2543281	279082	279708	SPAC24H6.06	SPAC23C4.18c	sld3	rad4	mug175	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Two-hybrid	physical	Taylor M (2011)	21945095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
570116	2541738	2542795	278232	279243	SPAC20G4.06c	SPAC9G1.05	adf1	aip1	cof1	SPAC9G1.05	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Chen Q (2011)	22024167	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
570117	2541738	2542805	278232	279253	SPAC20G4.06c	SPAC15A10.08	adf1	ain1	cof1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chen Q (2011)	22024167	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
570121	2541738	2540051	278232	276589	SPAC20G4.06c	SPBC32H8.12c	adf1	act1	cof1	cps8|pi012	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chen Q (2011)	22024167	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
570125	2541165	2543240	277680	279668	SPBC776.12c	SPAC694.06c	hsk1	mrc1	cdc7	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Matsumoto S (2011)	22024164	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
570126	2541165	2538959	277680	275533	SPBC776.12c	SPCC18B5.11c	hsk1	cds1	cdc7	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Matsumoto S (2011)	22024164	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
570127	2539399	2543240	275964	279668	SPCC550.13	SPAC694.06c	dfp1	mrc1	him1|rad35|dbf4	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Matsumoto S (2011)	22024164	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
570129	2541165	2543240	277680	279668	SPBC776.12c	SPAC694.06c	hsk1	mrc1	cdc7	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Matsumoto S (2011)	22024164	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in S phase:partial rescue|chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue|morphology:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
570130	2542266	2540620	278735	277146	SPAC17D4.02	SPBC4.04c	cdc45	mcm2	goa1|sna41	cdc19|nda1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Matsumoto S (2011)	22024164	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
570131	3361036	2541957	280112	278444	SPCC320.13c	SPAC23C11.16	ark1	plo1	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Halova L (2011)	21965528	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
571680	2542796	2538838	279244	275419	SPAC1687.04	SPCC1682.02c	mcb1	mcm3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Li JJ (2011)	22036784	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
571681	2542796	2539164	279244	275735	SPAC1687.04	SPCC16A11.17	mcb1	mcm4	-	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Li JJ (2011)	22036784	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
571682	2542796	2542477	279244	278937	SPAC1687.04	SPAC1B2.05	mcb1	mcm5	-	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Li JJ (2011)	22036784	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
571683	2542796	2540784	279244	277303	SPAC1687.04	SPBC211.04c	mcb1	mcm6	-	mis5	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Li JJ (2011)	22036784	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
571684	2542796	2540630	279244	277156	SPAC1687.04	SPBC25D12.03c	mcb1	mcm7	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Li JJ (2011)	22036784	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
571685	2542796	2539164	279244	275735	SPAC1687.04	SPCC16A11.17	mcb1	mcm4	-	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Li JJ (2011)	22036784	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
571686	2542796	2540784	279244	277303	SPAC1687.04	SPBC211.04c	mcb1	mcm6	-	mis5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Li JJ (2011)	22036784	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
571687	2542796	2540630	279244	277156	SPAC1687.04	SPBC25D12.03c	mcb1	mcm7	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Li JJ (2011)	22036784	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
571688	2542796	2542477	279244	278937	SPAC1687.04	SPAC1B2.05	mcb1	mcm5	-	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Li JJ (2011)	22036784	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
571689	2540620	2539164	277146	275735	SPBC4.04c	SPCC16A11.17	mcm2	mcm4	cdc19|nda1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Li JJ (2011)	22036784	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
571690	2542796	2539164	279244	275735	SPAC1687.04	SPCC16A11.17	mcb1	mcm4	-	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	FRET	physical	Li JJ (2011)	22036784	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assay	-	BIOGRID
589556	856845	2539287	36854	275855	YER109C	SPCC1742.01	FLO8	gsf2	PHD5|STA10|YER108C|transcription factor FLO8|L000003202|S000000910|S000029523|L000004208	SPCC1742.01|pfl1|SPCC1795.13|SPCPB16A4.07c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Matsuzawa T (2011)	22098069	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation:wild type	gsf2 (SPCC1742.01) deletion reverses flocculation seen when FLO8 is overexpressed	-	BIOGRID
592532	2543630	2539540	280044	276102	SPAC1F3.01	SPCC736.12c	rrp6	mmi1	SPAC3H8.11	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chen HM (2011)	22046364	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA modification:wild type	mmi1-ts3 mutant suppresses polyA tail extension of rec8 seen in rrp6-9 mutant	-	BIOGRID
592789	2540784	2540847	277303	277364	SPBC211.04c	SPBC428.18	mcm6	cdt1	mis5	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Maki K (2011)	21971174	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	Overexpression of Cdt1 rescues mcm6-S1 sensitivity to MMS and CPT	-	BIOGRID
592790	2540784	2540013	277303	276557	SPBC211.04c	SPBC14C8.07c	mcm6	cdc18	mis5	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Maki K (2011)	21971174	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	Overexpression of Cdc18 rescues mcm6-S1 sensitivity to MMS and CPT	-	BIOGRID
592791	2540847	2540784	277364	277303	SPBC428.18	SPBC211.04c	cdt1	mcm6	-	mis5	Two-hybrid	physical	Maki K (2011)	21971174	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
592792	2540784	2540847	277303	277364	SPBC211.04c	SPBC428.18	mcm6	cdt1	mis5	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Maki K (2011)	21971174	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
592793	2540784	2540847	277303	277364	SPBC211.04c	SPBC428.18	mcm6	cdt1	mis5	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Maki K (2011)	21971174	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution:wild type	Cdt1 overexpression increases binding of Mcm6 to replication origins in mcm6-S1 mutant|Cdt1 overexpression suppresses the accumulation of Rhp54 foci in mcm6-S1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
592795	2540784	2543481	277303	279901	SPBC211.04c	SPAPB2B4.03	mcm6	cig2	mis5	cyc17	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Maki K (2011)	21971174	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution:wild type	cig2 deletion restores Mcm6 binding to replication origins in mcm6-S1 mutant|cig2 deletion suppresses accumulation of Rhp54 foci in mcm6-S1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
592796	2540784	2543481	277303	279901	SPBC211.04c	SPAPB2B4.03	mcm6	cig2	mis5	cyc17	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Maki K (2011)	21971174	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	cig2 deletion rescues MMS and CPT sensitivity of mcm6-S1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
592802	2540735	2542239	277258	278711	SPBC83.03c	SPAC18G6.02c	tas3	chp1	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Schalch T (2011)	22081013	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
592818	2541055	2543095	277570	279527	SPBC409.07c	SPAC4A8.03c	wis1	ptc4	smf2|spc2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Di Y (2011)	22139357	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	Sty1 phosphorylation is increased in the wis1DD ptc4 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
592819	2543095	2541652	279527	278148	SPAC4A8.03c	SPAC24B11.06c	ptc4	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Di Y (2011)	22139357	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
592820	2541652	2543095	278148	279527	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC4A8.03c	sty1	ptc4	phh1|spc1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Di Y (2011)	22139357	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
592827	2542703	2542703	279156	279156	SPAC26H5.06	SPAC26H5.06	pot1	pot1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Nandakumar J (2011)	21911358	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
592828	2542703	2542414	279156	278878	SPAC26H5.06	SPAC6F6.16c	pot1	tpz1	-	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Nandakumar J (2011)	21911358	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
592837	2540492	2539352	277020	275918	SPBC2D10.13	SPCC188.07	est1	ccq1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Moser BA (2011)	22101932	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
592838	2542414	2539352	278878	275918	SPAC6F6.16c	SPCC188.07	tpz1	ccq1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Moser BA (2011)	22101932	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
592839	2542414	2539352	278878	275918	SPAC6F6.16c	SPCC188.07	tpz1	ccq1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Moser BA (2011)	22101932	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
592840	2540492	9407016	277020	1028379	SPBC2D10.13	SPNCRNA.214	est1	ter1	-	SPNG585	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Moser BA (2011)	22101932	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
592841	2540115	2539352	276652	275918	SPBC1778.02	SPCC188.07	rap1	ccq1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Moser BA (2011)	22101932	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution:undetermined	ccq1 deletion abrogates Trt1 association to telomeres in rap1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
592842	2539352	9407016	275918	1028379	SPCC188.07	SPNCRNA.214	ccq1	ter1	-	SPNG585	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Moser BA (2011)	22101932	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
592843	2540115	2539209	276652	275779	SPBC1778.02	SPCC23B6.03c	rap1	tel1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Moser BA (2011)	22101932	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution:wild type|protein/peptide modification:wild type	Deletion of tel1 and rad3 reduces Ccq1 association with TER1 RNA in rap1 mutant|Deletion of tel1 and rad3 reduces Ccq1 phosphorylation in rap1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
592844	2540115	2540719	276652	277242	SPBC1778.02	SPBC216.05	rap1	rad3	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Moser BA (2011)	22101932	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution:wild type|protein/peptide modification:wild type	Deletion of tel1 and rad3 reduces Ccq1 association with TER1 RNA in rap1 mutant|Deletion of tel1 and rad3 reduces Ccq1 phosphorylation in rap1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
592845	2539352	2540492	275918	277020	SPCC188.07	SPBC2D10.13	ccq1	est1	-	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Moser BA (2011)	22101932	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
592868	2539420	2540627	275985	277153	SPCC970.07c	SPBC25H2.13c	raf2	cdc20	clr7|cmc2|dos2	pol2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Li F (2011)	21725325	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
592869	2539420	2539050	275985	275623	SPCC970.07c	SPCC11E10.08	raf2	rik1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Li F (2011)	21725325	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
592870	2539420	2541536	275985	278036	SPCC970.07c	SPAC1071.02	raf2	mms19	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Li F (2011)	21725325	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
592871	2541536	2539420	278036	275985	SPAC1071.02	SPCC970.07c	mms19	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Li F (2011)	21725325	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
592872	2540627	2539420	277153	275985	SPBC25H2.13c	SPCC970.07c	cdc20	raf2	pol2	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Li F (2011)	21725325	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	interaction between mutant Cdc20-P7 and WT Dos2 reduced at high temp (34 degrees)	-	BIOGRID
592873	2538930	2541536	275506	278036	SPCC188.13c	SPAC1071.02	dcr1	mms19	SPCC584.10c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Li F (2011)	21725325	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type	mms19 deletion in dcr1 mutant suppresses accumulation of centromeric transcripts	-	BIOGRID
592874	2540627	2541536	277153	278036	SPBC25H2.13c	SPAC1071.02	cdc20	mms19	pol2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Li F (2011)	21725325	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	interaction between mutant Cdc20-P7 and WT Mms19 abolished at high temp (34 degrees)	-	BIOGRID
592875	2541536	2540292	278036	276823	SPAC1071.02	SPBC28F2.12	mms19	rpb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Li F (2011)	21725325	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
593084	2539817	3361562	276367	280638	SPBC146.03c	SPAC11E3.03	cut3	csm1	smc4	pcs1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tada K (2011)	21633354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	cut3-477 pcs1 double mutant is synthetic lethal at 30 degrees	-	BIOGRID
593085	2539817	2540246	276367	276778	SPBC146.03c	SPBC336.07	cut3	sfc3	smc4	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tada K (2011)	21633354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined	sfc3-1 rescues cut3-477 growth at 34 degrees	-	BIOGRID
593086	3361036	2538744	280112	275327	SPCC320.13c	SPCC306.03c	ark1	cnd2	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Tada K (2011)	21633354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
593087	3361036	2538744	280112	275327	SPCC320.13c	SPCC306.03c	ark1	cnd2	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tada K (2011)	21633354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:undetermined	cnd2-3E (phospho mimetic) mutation in ark1-as2 mutant rescues growth on 1NM-PP1	-	BIOGRID
593089	3361036	23397	280112	116970	SPCC320.13c	-	ark1	NCAPH	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	BRRN1|CAP-H	Biochemical Activity	physical	Tada K (2011)	21633354	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
593100	2539668	2538744	276223	275327	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC306.03c	pht1	cnd2	pi001	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Tada K (2011)	21633354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	enhanced by Ark1 phosphorylation	-	BIOGRID
593101	2539499	2538744	276062	275327	SPCC622.08c	SPCC306.03c	hta1	cnd2	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Tada K (2011)	21633354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	enhanced by Ark1 phosphorylation	-	BIOGRID
593102	2542226	2538744	278699	275327	SPAC19G12.06c	SPCC306.03c	hta2	cnd2	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Tada K (2011)	21633354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	enhanced by Ark1 phosphorylation	-	BIOGRID
593103	2539668	2539499	276223	276062	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC622.08c	pht1	hta1	pi001	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tada K (2011)	21633354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	h2a.z h2a-R18A mutants are synthetic lethal	-	BIOGRID
593104	2539668	2542226	276223	278699	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC19G12.06c	pht1	hta2	pi001	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tada K (2011)	21633354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	h2a.z h2a-R18A mutants are synthetic lethal	-	BIOGRID
593105	2539668	2539499	276223	276062	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC622.08c	pht1	hta1	pi001	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tada K (2011)	21633354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in M phase	and decreased condensin localization at kinetochores|h2a.z h2a-R18A double mutants show increased condensation defect, unresolved DNA at anaphase, lagging chromosomes at anaphase	-	BIOGRID
593106	2539668	2542226	276223	278699	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC19G12.06c	pht1	hta2	pi001	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tada K (2011)	21633354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in M phase	and decreased condensin localization at kinetochores|h2a.z h2a-R18A double mutants show increased condensation defect, unresolved DNA at anaphase, lagging chromosomes at anaphase	-	BIOGRID
593107	2538744	2539817	275327	276367	SPCC306.03c	SPBC146.03c	cnd2	cut3	-	smc4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tada K (2011)	21633354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
593108	2541155	2538744	277670	275327	SPBC6B1.04	SPCC306.03c	mde4	cnd2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tada K (2011)	21633354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
593109	3361562	2539817	280638	276367	SPAC11E3.03	SPBC146.03c	csm1	cut3	pcs1	smc4	Two-hybrid	physical	Tada K (2011)	21633354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
593110	3361562	2538744	280638	275327	SPAC11E3.03	SPCC306.03c	csm1	cnd2	pcs1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tada K (2011)	21633354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
593111	3361562	2541201	280638	277715	SPAC11E3.03	SPBC776.13	csm1	cnd1	pcs1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tada K (2011)	21633354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
593112	2541155	2541201	277670	277715	SPBC6B1.04	SPBC776.13	mde4	cnd1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tada K (2011)	21633354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
593416	2543027	2540127	279463	276664	SPAC110.03	SPBC106.20	cdc42	exo70	-	SPBC582.02	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Estravis M (2011)	21899677	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
593418	2543027	2539992	279463	276536	SPAC110.03	SPBC1289.04c	cdc42	pob1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Estravis M (2011)	21899677	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	overexpression of pob1 rescues growth of cdc42L160S mutant at 36 degrees	-	BIOGRID
593419	2543027	2539992	279463	276536	SPAC110.03	SPBC1289.04c	cdc42	pob1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Estravis M (2011)	21899677	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein secretion:partial rescue|vacuolar morphology:partial rescue|vacuolar transport:partial rescue	overexpression of pob1 suppresses cdc42L160S mutant phenotypes (Cpy1 secretion, accumulation of GFP-Syb1 structures, vacuole size and morphology, vacuole transport)	-	BIOGRID
593420	2543027	2539377	279463	275943	SPAC110.03	SPCC825.03c	cdc42	psy1	-	sso1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Estravis M (2011)	21899677	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein secretion:partial rescue|vacuolar morphology:partial rescue|vacuolar transport:partial rescue	overexpression of psy1 suppresses cdc42L160S mutant phenotypes (Cpy1 secretion, accumulation of GFP-Syb1 structures, vacuole size and morphology, vacuole transport)	-	BIOGRID
593422	2543027	3361511	279463	280587	SPAC110.03	SPAC23C4.08	cdc42	rho3	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Estravis M (2011)	21899677	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein secretion:partial rescue|vacuolar morphology:partial rescue|vacuolar transport:partial rescue	overexpression of rho3 suppresses cdc42L160S mutant phenotypes (Cpy1 secretion, accumulation of GFP-Syb1 structures, vacuole size and morphology, vacuole transport)	-	BIOGRID
593423	2543027	2543280	279463	279707	SPAC110.03	SPAC9E9.07c	cdc42	ypt2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Estravis M (2011)	21899677	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:partial rescue|protein secretion:partial rescue|vacuolar morphology:partial rescue|vacuolar transport:partial rescue	overexpression of ypt2 improves morphology of cdc42L160S mutant cells|overexpression of ypt2 suppresses cdc42L160S mutant phenotypes (Cpy1 secretion, accumulation of GFP-Syb1 structures, vacuole size and morphology, vacuole transport)	-	BIOGRID
593424	2543027	2539377	279463	275943	SPAC110.03	SPCC825.03c	cdc42	psy1	-	sso1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Estravis M (2011)	21899677	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	overexpression of psy1 rescues growth of cdc42L160S mutant at 35 degrees	-	BIOGRID
593425	2543027	3361511	279463	280587	SPAC110.03	SPAC23C4.08	cdc42	rho3	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Estravis M (2011)	21899677	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	overexpression of rho3 rescues growth of cdc42L160S mutant at 36 degrees	-	BIOGRID
593426	2543027	3361511	279463	280587	SPAC110.03	SPAC23C4.08	cdc42	rho3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Estravis M (2011)	21899677	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	cdc42L160S rho3 double mutant is synthetically lethal	-	BIOGRID
593427	2543027	2539407	279463	275972	SPAC110.03	SPCC970.09	cdc42	sec8	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Estravis M (2011)	21899677	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	in Cdc42T17N (dominant negative GDP-bound form), but not with WT Cdc42	-	BIOGRID
593428	2543027	2541731	279463	278225	SPAC110.03	SPAC6G9.11	cdc42	syb1	-	snc1	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Estravis M (2011)	21899677	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	overexpression of syb1 increases growth defect of cdc42L160S mutant at 35 degrees	-	BIOGRID
593429	2543027	2543280	279463	279707	SPAC110.03	SPAC9E9.07c	cdc42	ypt2	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Estravis M (2011)	21899677	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	overexpression of ypt2 rescues growth of cdc42L160S mutant at 35 degrees	-	BIOGRID
593430	2540127	2543027	276664	279463	SPBC106.20	SPAC110.03	exo70	cdc42	SPBC582.02	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Estravis M (2011)	21899677	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	in Cdc42T17N (dominant negative GDP-bound form), but not with GTP-bound Cdc42G12V mutant	-	BIOGRID
593431	2539992	2543027	276536	279463	SPBC1289.04c	SPAC110.03	pob1	cdc42	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Estravis M (2011)	21899677	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
593433	2539407	2543027	275972	279463	SPCC970.09	SPAC110.03	sec8	cdc42	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Estravis M (2011)	21899677	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	overexpression of cdc42 or cdc42T17N (GDP-bound form) rescues growth of sec8-1 mutant at 36 degrees	-	BIOGRID
593435	2539733	2540398	276285	276926	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC26H8.10	pab2	dis3	-	rrp44	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lemieux C (2011)	21981922	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	pab2 dis-54 double mutant had increased levels of rpl30-2 transcripts	-	BIOGRID
593437	2539733	3361384	276285	280460	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC12G12.13c	pab2	cid14	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lemieux C (2011)	21981922	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	pab2 cid14 double mutant had increased levels of rpl30-2 transcripts	-	BIOGRID
593438	2539733	2541639	276285	278135	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC6F12.16c	pab2	mtr4	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lemieux C (2011)	21981922	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	pab2 mtr4 double mutant had increased levels of rpl30-2 transcripts (mtr4 expression downregulated by nmt1 promoter)	-	BIOGRID
594628	2540679	2543510	277204	279928	SPBC3D6.10	SPAC30D11.07	apn2	nth1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nilsen L (2011)	22084197	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	deletion of nth1 rescues apn2 sensitivity to MMS|deletion of nth1 rescues tdp1 apn2 double mutant sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
594629	2540679	2539579	277204	276138	SPBC3D6.10	SPCP31B10.05	apn2	tdp1	-	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Nilsen L (2011)	22084197	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|resistance to chemicals	apn2 tdp1 double mutant is sensitive to MMS	-	BIOGRID
594720	2539579	2543510	276138	279928	SPCP31B10.05	SPAC30D11.07	tdp1	nth1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nilsen L (2011)	22084197	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	deletion of nth1 rescues tdp1 apn2 double mutant sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
603534	2543596	2539261	280011	275831	SPAC8F11.06	SPCC1682.04	brr6	cdc31	brl1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tamm T (2011)	22042620	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue	cdc31.1 mutation rescues growth of brr6.ds1 mutant at 20 degrees	-	BIOGRID
603588	2542161	2543596	278637	280011	SPAC1786.03	SPAC8F11.06	cut11	brr6	SPAC24C9.01	brl1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tamm T (2011)	22042620	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spindle morphology:partial rescue	brr6.ts8 mutation improves spindle integrity in cut11.1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
603589	2542161	2543596	278637	280011	SPAC1786.03	SPAC8F11.06	cut11	brr6	SPAC24C9.01	brl1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tamm T (2011)	22042620	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|heat sensitivity:wild type	brr6.ds1 mutation rescues growth of cut11.1 at 30 degrees|brr6.ts8 mutation rescues growth of cut11.1 at 30 degrees	-	BIOGRID
603590	2543596	2541141	280011	277656	SPAC8F11.06	SPBC649.05	brr6	cut12	brl1	stf1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tamm T (2011)	22042620	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	brr6.ts8 cut12.1 double mutant is synthetic lethal at 32 degrees	-	BIOGRID
603591	2543596	2541247	280011	277761	SPAC8F11.06	SPBC947.12	brr6	kms2	brl1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tamm T (2011)	22042620	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	brr6.ts8 kms2 double mutant is synthetic lethal at 32 degrees	-	BIOGRID
603592	2543596	2539914	280011	276458	SPAC8F11.06	SPBC12D12.01	brr6	sad1	brl1	SPBC16H5.01c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tamm T (2011)	22042620	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	brr6.ts8 sad1.2 double mutant is synthetic lethal at 30 degrees	-	BIOGRID
603593	2543596	2543069	280011	279502	SPAC8F11.06	SPAC3A11.05c	brr6	kms1	brl1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tamm T (2011)	22042620	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:wild type	kms1 deletion rescues growth of brr6.ds1 at 20 degrees	-	BIOGRID
603594	2543596	2541009	280011	277524	SPAC8F11.06	SPBC428.04	brr6	apq12	brl1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tamm T (2011)	22042620	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	brr6.ts8 apq12 synthetic lethality shown through tetrad dissection	-	BIOGRID
603595	2541009	2539261	277524	275831	SPBC428.04	SPCC1682.04	apq12	cdc31	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tamm T (2011)	22042620	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:wild type	cdc31.1 mutation rescues growth of apq12 mutant at 20 degrees	-	BIOGRID
603596	2541009	2541141	277524	277656	SPBC428.04	SPBC649.05	apq12	cut12	-	stf1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tamm T (2011)	22042620	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity|inviable	apq12 cut12.1 double mutant is synthetic lethal at 20 degrees	-	BIOGRID
603597	2541009	2539914	277524	276458	SPBC428.04	SPBC12D12.01	apq12	sad1	-	SPBC16H5.01c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tamm T (2011)	22042620	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity|inviable	apq12 sad1.2 double mutant is synthetic lethal at 30 degrees	-	BIOGRID
603598	2542161	2541009	278637	277524	SPAC1786.03	SPBC428.04	cut11	apq12	SPAC24C9.01	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tamm T (2011)	22042620	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:wild type	apq12 deletion rescues growth of cut11.1 mutant at 30 degrees	-	BIOGRID
603599	2541009	2541247	277524	277761	SPBC428.04	SPBC947.12	apq12	kms2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tamm T (2011)	22042620	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity|inviable	at 20 degrees	-	BIOGRID
606910	3361477	64547	280553	249128	SPAC56F8.08	-	mud1	Bcl2l11	ddi1|ucp1	Bim|BimL	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Wiggins CM (2011)	21378313	284812	10116	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
610956	2540764	2541179	277284	277693	SPBC19C7.02	SPBC6B1.08c	ubr1	ofd1	SPBC32F12.14	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lee CY (2011)	22017871	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	Sre1N is the N-terminal transcription factor domain of Sre1|ofd1+ deletion increases Sre1N levels in ubr1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
610957	2540730	2541179	277253	277693	SPBC19C2.09	SPBC6B1.08c	sre1	ofd1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Lee CY (2011)	22017871	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
610961	2540574	2540584	277101	277110	SPBC409.03	SPBC28F2.07	swi5	sfr1	-	dds20|mug13	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kokabu Y (2011)	22033972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Swi5-Sfr1 1:1 ratio	-	BIOGRID
610962	2540574	2540574	277101	277101	SPBC409.03	SPBC409.03	swi5	swi5	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kokabu Y (2011)	22033972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Swi5 dimer	-	BIOGRID
611008	2540574	2541633	277101	278129	SPBC409.03	SPAC664.01c	swi5	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Matsuda E (2011)	22042869	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type|mating type switching:wild type	swi5 swi6-115 double mutant shows elevated heterologous mating-type switching compared to each single	-	BIOGRID
611067	2542036	2539087	278518	275659	SPAC23A1.19c	SPCC1259.13	hrq1	chk1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	rad27	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Groocock LM (2012)	22064477	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:wild type	chk1+ deletion suppresses cell elongation phenotype of hrq1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
611068	2542036	2539087	278518	275659	SPAC23A1.19c	SPCC1259.13	hrq1	chk1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	rad27	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Groocock LM (2012)	22064477	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
611069	2542036	2542925	278518	279366	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC11E3.04c	hrq1	ubc13	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	spu13|sst5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Groocock LM (2012)	22064477	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutant is synthetic sick with and without cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
611070	2542036	2539723	278518	276276	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC1347.01c	hrq1	rev1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	SPBC215.16c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Groocock LM (2012)	22064477	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	growth in cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
611071	2542036	2543358	278518	279780	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC688.10	hrq1	rev3	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Groocock LM (2012)	22064477	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	growth in cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
611073	2541120	2542925	277635	279366	SPBC649.03	SPAC11E3.04c	rhp14	ubc13	-	spu13|sst5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Groocock LM (2012)	22064477	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	growth in cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
611074	2542036	2541120	278518	277635	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC649.03	hrq1	rhp14	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Groocock LM (2012)	22064477	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
611075	2542036	2538720	278518	275304	SPAC23A1.19c	SPCC338.05c	hrq1	mms2	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	spm2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Groocock LM (2012)	22064477	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
611076	2542036	2540020	278518	276564	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC16D10.09	hrq1	pcn1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	pcn	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Groocock LM (2012)	22064477	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	hrq1 pcn1-K164R	-	BIOGRID
611077	2542036	2541512	278518	278013	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC11E3.08c	hrq1	nse6	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Groocock LM (2012)	22064477	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
611078	2542036	2540802	278518	277321	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC1921.02	hrq1	rad60	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Groocock LM (2012)	22064477	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	hrq1 rad60E380R	-	BIOGRID
611079	2542036	2539004	278518	275578	SPAC23A1.19c	SPCC4G3.05c	hrq1	mus81	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	slx3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Groocock LM (2012)	22064477	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
611080	2542036	2541620	278518	278117	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC2G11.12	hrq1	rqh1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Groocock LM (2012)	22064477	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	growth on cisplatin and CPT	-	BIOGRID
611106	3361470	2540060	280546	276598	SPAC3G9.01	SPBC106.01	nsk1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chen JS (2011)	22065639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:wild type	mph1+ deletion suppresses phase 2 delay in spindle dynamics seen in nsk1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
611108	2539869	3361470	276415	280546	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC3G9.01	cdc2	nsk1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Chen JS (2011)	22065639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
611109	2542358	3361470	278823	280546	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC3G9.01	clp1	nsk1	flp1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Chen JS (2011)	22065639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Dephosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
611110	2542358	3361470	278823	280546	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC3G9.01	clp1	nsk1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2011)	22065639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
611111	2542358	3361491	278823	280567	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC1805.08	clp1	dlc1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2011)	22065639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
611113	2540361	3361470	276890	280546	SPBC2F12.13	SPAC3G9.01	klp5	nsk1	sot1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Chen JS (2011)	22065639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	nsk1+ deletion rescued growth of klp1 mutant on thiabendazole	-	BIOGRID
611114	3361470	2539155	280546	275727	SPAC3G9.01	SPCC1020.02	nsk1	spc7	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chen JS (2011)	22065639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	nsk1 spc7-23	-	BIOGRID
611115	3361470	2542304	280546	278771	SPAC3G9.01	SPAC1687.20c	nsk1	mis6	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chen JS (2011)	22065639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	nsk1 mis6-302 double mutant grows slower at 32 degrees	-	BIOGRID
611116	3361470	2539869	280546	276415	SPAC3G9.01	SPBC11B10.09	nsk1	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen JS (2011)	22065639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
611117	3361470	3361036	280546	280112	SPAC3G9.01	SPCC320.13c	nsk1	ark1	-	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chen JS (2011)	22065639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	nsk1-18D ark1-T7	-	BIOGRID
611118	3361470	2541193	280546	277707	SPAC3G9.01	SPBC776.02c	nsk1	dis2	-	bws1|sds1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chen JS (2011)	22065639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
611119	3361470	3361491	280546	280567	SPAC3G9.01	SPAC1805.08	nsk1	dlc1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2011)	22065639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
611120	3361470	2542358	280546	278823	SPAC3G9.01	SPAC1782.09c	nsk1	clp1	-	flp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2011)	22065639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
611121	3361470	3361491	280546	280567	SPAC3G9.01	SPAC1805.08	nsk1	dlc1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chen JS (2011)	22065639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
611122	3361470	3361491	280546	280567	SPAC3G9.01	SPAC1805.08	nsk1	dlc1	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Chen JS (2011)	22065639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	EM analysis	-	BIOGRID
611209	2542545	2540865	279002	277382	SPAC19G12.07c	SPBC4B4.07c	rsd1	usp102	-	mud1|U1A	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Shao W (2012)	22064476	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
611210	2541211	2540865	277725	277382	SPBC839.10	SPBC4B4.07c	usp107	usp102	snu71	mud1|U1A	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Shao W (2012)	22064476	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
611386	2541251	2540730	277765	277253	SPBC947.10	SPBC19C2.09	dsc1	sre1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Stewart EV (2012)	22086920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	metal resistance:wild type	Expression of Sre1N (N-terminal transcription factor domain of Sre1) rescues growth of dsc1-1 mutant on CoCl2	-	BIOGRID
611387	2541990	2540730	278474	277253	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC19C2.09	dsc3	sre1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Stewart EV (2012)	22086920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	metal resistance:wild type	Expression of Sre1N (N-terminal transcription factor domain of Sre1) rescues growth of dsc3-1 mutant on CoCl2	-	BIOGRID
611388	2541065	2540730	277580	277253	SPBC3B9.15c	SPBC19C2.09	scp1	sre1	scap	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Stewart EV (2012)	22086920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	metal resistance:wild type	Expression of Sre1N (N-terminal transcription factor domain of Sre1) rescues growth of scp1 mutant on CoCl2	-	BIOGRID
611390	2539260	2540730	275830	277253	SPCC285.11	SPBC19C2.09	dsc5	sre1	ucp10	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Stewart EV (2012)	22086920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	metal resistance:wild type	Expression of Sre1N (N-terminal transcription factor domain of Sre1) rescues growth of dsc5-1 mutant on CoCl2	-	BIOGRID
611393	2542744	2540730	279194	277253	SPAC1565.08	SPBC19C2.09	cdc48	sre1	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Stewart EV (2012)	22086920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	metal resistance:wild type	Expression of Sre1N (N-terminal transcription factor domain of Sre1) rescues growth of dsc6-1 mutant on CoCl2	-	BIOGRID
611396	2542884	2541251	279329	277765	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC947.10	dsc2	dsc1	ucp14	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Stewart EV (2012)	22086920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
611397	2542884	2541990	279329	278474	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC20H4.02	dsc2	dsc3	ucp14	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Stewart EV (2012)	22086920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
611398	2542884	2543396	279329	279818	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC4D7.11	dsc2	dsc4	ucp14	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Stewart EV (2012)	22086920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
611399	2542884	2539260	279329	275830	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC285.11	dsc2	dsc5	ucp14	ucp10	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Stewart EV (2012)	22086920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
611400	2542884	2542744	279329	279194	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC1565.08	dsc2	cdc48	ucp14	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Stewart EV (2012)	22086920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	requires UBX domain of Dsc5/Ucp10	-	BIOGRID
611404	2539260	2542744	275830	279194	SPCC285.11	SPAC1565.08	dsc5	cdc48	ucp10	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Stewart EV (2012)	22086920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	UBX domain of Dsc5/Ucp10 interacts with Cdc48	-	BIOGRID
611504	2540728	2538955	277251	275529	SPBC216.06c	SPCC1450.02	swi1	bdf1	-	SPCC191.13|brf1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Garabedian MV (2011)	22095079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	bdf1 deletion rescues growth of swi1 mutant on hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
611505	2540728	2543426	277251	279846	SPBC216.06c	SPAC631.02	swi1	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Garabedian MV (2011)	22095079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	bdf2 deletion rescues growth of swi1 mutant on hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
611506	2540992	2543426	277508	279846	SPBC342.05	SPAC631.02	crb2	bdf2	rhp9	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Garabedian MV (2011)	22095079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	bdf2 deletion rescues growth of crb2 mutant on hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
611507	2543240	2543426	279668	279846	SPAC694.06c	SPAC631.02	mrc1	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Garabedian MV (2011)	22095079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	bdf2 deletion rescues growth of mrc1 mutant on hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
611508	2538959	2543426	275533	279846	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC631.02	cds1	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Garabedian MV (2011)	22095079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	bdf2 deletion rescues growth of cds1 mutant on hydroxyurea|bdf2 deletion rescues growth of chk1 cds1 double mutant on hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
611509	2539087	2543426	275659	279846	SPCC1259.13	SPAC631.02	chk1	bdf2	rad27	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Garabedian MV (2011)	22095079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	bdf2 deletion rescues growth of chk1 cds1 double mutant on hydroxyurea|bdf2 deletion rescues growth of chk1 mutant on hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
611510	2540719	2543426	277242	279846	SPBC216.05	SPAC631.02	rad3	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Garabedian MV (2011)	22095079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	bdf2 deletion rescues growth of rad3 mutant on hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
611511	2538955	2543426	275529	279846	SPCC1450.02	SPAC631.02	bdf1	bdf2	SPCC191.13|brf1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Garabedian MV (2011)	22095079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
611512	2538955	2538959	275529	275533	SPCC1450.02	SPCC18B5.11c	bdf1	cds1	SPCC191.13|brf1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Garabedian MV (2011)	22095079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	bdf1 cds1 double mutant is synthetic sick on MMS, CPT, and bleomycin	-	BIOGRID
611513	2538955	2539087	275529	275659	SPCC1450.02	SPCC1259.13	bdf1	chk1	SPCC191.13|brf1	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Garabedian MV (2011)	22095079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	bdf1 chk1 double mutant is synthetic sick on MMS, CPT and bleomycin	-	BIOGRID
611514	2538955	2543240	275529	279668	SPCC1450.02	SPAC694.06c	bdf1	mrc1	SPCC191.13|brf1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Garabedian MV (2011)	22095079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	bdf1 mrc1 double mutant is synthetic sick on CPT	-	BIOGRID
611515	2538955	2540719	275529	277242	SPCC1450.02	SPBC216.05	bdf1	rad3	SPCC191.13|brf1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Garabedian MV (2011)	22095079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals	bdf1 rad3 double mutant is synthetic sick after UV, on MMS, CPT, and bleomycin	-	BIOGRID
611516	2543426	2538959	279846	275533	SPAC631.02	SPCC18B5.11c	bdf2	cds1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Garabedian MV (2011)	22095079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	bdf2 cds1 double mutant is synthetic sick on MMS, CPT, and bleomycin	-	BIOGRID
611517	2543426	2539087	279846	275659	SPAC631.02	SPCC1259.13	bdf2	chk1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Garabedian MV (2011)	22095079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals	bdf2 chk1 double mutant is synthetic sick after UV exposure, and on CPT	-	BIOGRID
611518	2543426	2543240	279846	279668	SPAC631.02	SPAC694.06c	bdf2	mrc1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Garabedian MV (2011)	22095079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	bdf2 mrc1 double mutant is synthetic sick on CPT	-	BIOGRID
611519	2543426	2540719	279846	277242	SPAC631.02	SPBC216.05	bdf2	rad3	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Garabedian MV (2011)	22095079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	bdf2 rad3 double mutant is synthetic sick on CPT and bleomycin	-	BIOGRID
611520	2538959	2538955	275533	275529	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC1450.02	cds1	bdf1	-	SPCC191.13|brf1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Garabedian MV (2011)	22095079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue	bdf1 deletion rescues growth of cds1 mutant after UV	-	BIOGRID
611521	2539087	2538955	275659	275529	SPCC1259.13	SPCC1450.02	chk1	bdf1	rad27	SPCC191.13|brf1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Garabedian MV (2011)	22095079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	bdf1 deletion rescues growth of chk1 mutant after UV exposure and on hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
611522	2540992	2538955	277508	275529	SPBC342.05	SPCC1450.02	crb2	bdf1	rhp9	SPCC191.13|brf1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Garabedian MV (2011)	22095079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	bdf1 deletion rescues growth of crb2 mutant on hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
611523	2543240	2538955	279668	275529	SPAC694.06c	SPCC1450.02	mrc1	bdf1	-	SPCC191.13|brf1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Garabedian MV (2011)	22095079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue	bdf1 deletion suppresses formation of fragmented chromosomes in mrc1 mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
611524	2543240	2543426	279668	279846	SPAC694.06c	SPAC631.02	mrc1	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Garabedian MV (2011)	22095079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue|protein/peptide distribution:partial rescue	bdf2 deletion suppresses formation of Rad22 foci in mrc1 mutant cells|bdf2 deletion suppresses formation of fragmented chromosomes in mrc1 mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
611525	2543240	2538955	279668	275529	SPAC694.06c	SPCC1450.02	mrc1	bdf1	-	SPCC191.13|brf1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Garabedian MV (2011)	22095079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	bdf1 deletion rescues growth of mrc1 mutant on hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
611526	2543240	2541200	279668	277714	SPAC694.06c	SPBC8D2.03c	mrc1	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Garabedian MV (2011)	22095079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	hhf2-KR mutation rescues growth on hydroxyurea of mrc1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
611527	2543240	2543506	279668	279924	SPAC694.06c	SPAC637.12c	mrc1	mst1	-	kat5	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Garabedian MV (2011)	22095079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	mst1-L344S mutation rescues growth on hydroxyurea of mrc1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
611528	2543240	2539114	279668	275686	SPAC694.06c	SPCC1795.08c	mrc1	vid21	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Garabedian MV (2011)	22095079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	vid21 depletion rescues growth on hydroxyurea of mrc1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
611529	2540728	2541200	277251	277714	SPBC216.06c	SPBC8D2.03c	swi1	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Garabedian MV (2011)	22095079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	hhf2-KR mutation rescues growth on hydroxyurea of swi1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
611530	2540728	2543506	277251	279924	SPBC216.06c	SPAC637.12c	swi1	mst1	-	kat5	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Garabedian MV (2011)	22095079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	mst1-L344S mutation rescues growth on hydroxyurea of swi1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
611531	2540728	2539114	277251	275686	SPBC216.06c	SPCC1795.08c	swi1	vid21	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Garabedian MV (2011)	22095079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	vid21 depletion rescues growth on hydroxyurea of swi1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
611810	3361532	2539287	280608	275855	SPAC1D4.11c	SPCC1742.01	lkh1	gsf2	kic1	SPCC1742.01|pfl1|SPCC1795.13|SPCPB16A4.07c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Matsuzawa T (2011)	22098069	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation:wild type|interaction with host/environment:wild type	gsf2 (SPCC1742.01) deletion reverses agar adhesion of lkh1 mutant|gsf2 (SPCC1742.01) deletion reverses flocculation seen in lkh1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
611811	2539287	2539196	275855	275767	SPCC1742.01	SPCC1795.03	gsf2	gms1	SPCC1742.01|pfl1|SPCC1795.13|SPCPB16A4.07c	gmn3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Matsuzawa T (2011)	22098069	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation:wild type	gms1 deletion reverses flocculation seen when expressing gsf2 (SPCC1742.01)	-	BIOGRID
611812	2539287	2543508	275855	279926	SPCC1742.01	SPAC8F11.10c	gsf2	pvg1	SPCC1742.01|pfl1|SPCC1795.13|SPCPB16A4.07c	SPACUNK4.18	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Matsuzawa T (2011)	22098069	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation	pvg1 deletion enhances flocculation seen when overexpressing gsf2 (SPCC1742.01)	-	BIOGRID
611904	2541013	2542162	277528	278638	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC6F6.08c	far10	cdc16	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	bub2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis	csc1 cdc16-116 double mutant has increased percentage of hyperseptated cells	-	BIOGRID
611905	2541013	2542162	277528	278638	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC6F6.08c	far10	cdc16	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	bub2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	csc1 cdc16-116	-	BIOGRID
611906	2542162	2541013	278638	277528	SPAC6F6.08c	SPBC3H7.13	cdc16	far10	bub2	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	csc1 overexpression rescues growth defect of cdc16-116 mutant	-	BIOGRID
611907	2540495	2541013	277023	277528	SPBC27B12.04c	SPBC3H7.13	far11	far10	SPBC27B12.04c|csc2	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
611908	2543042	2541013	279477	277528	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC3H7.13	paa1	far10	-	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
611914	2540825	2543254	277343	279682	SPBC428.08c	SPAC1006.03c	clr4	red1	-	iss3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zofall M (2012)	22144463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
611915	2538848	2543254	275429	279682	SPCC613.12c	SPAC1006.03c	raf1	red1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	iss3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zofall M (2012)	22144463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
611916	2540825	2539733	277343	276285	SPBC428.08c	SPBC16E9.12c	clr4	pab2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Zofall M (2012)	22144463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	clr4 pab2 double mutant has increased expression ofa long RNA starting upstream of ssm4	-	BIOGRID
612191	2542080	2539555	278557	276116	SPAC27D7.03c	SPCC4B3.08	mei2	lsg1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sukegawa Y (2011)	22144909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	lsg1 deletion rescues growth of a constitutively active and temperature-sensitive mei2-L-SATA mutant at 25 degrees	-	BIOGRID
612192	2542080	2541672	278557	278168	SPAC27D7.03c	SPAC2F3.15	mei2	lsk1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sukegawa Y (2011)	22144909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	lsk1 deletion rescues growth of a constitutively active and temperature-sensitive mei2-L-SATA mutant at 25 degrees	-	BIOGRID
612193	2542080	2540879	278557	277396	SPAC27D7.03c	SPBC530.13	mei2	lsc1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sukegawa Y (2011)	22144909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	lsc1 deletion rescues growth of a constitutively active and temperature-sensitive mei2-L-SATA mutant at 25 degrees	-	BIOGRID
612194	2540292	2540258	276823	276789	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC32C12.02	rpb1	ste11	-	aff1|stex	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sukegawa Y (2011)	22144909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue|sporulation efficiency:partial rescue	ste11 overexpression suppresses defects in mating and sporulation in rpb1-12S2ACTD mutant (contains 12 copies of a mutant heptad repeat)	-	BIOGRID
612195	2541055	2541672	277570	278168	SPBC409.07c	SPAC2F3.15	wis1	lsk1	smf2|spc2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sukegawa Y (2011)	22144909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification:wild type	lsk1 deletion reverses CTD-phosphorylation at Ser2 (of Rpb1) seen in strain overexpressing a constitutively active form of Wis1	-	BIOGRID
612196	2541652	2541672	278148	278168	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC2F3.15	sty1	lsk1	phh1|spc1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Sukegawa Y (2011)	22144909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
612197	2542080	2541672	278557	278168	SPAC27D7.03c	SPAC2F3.15	mei2	lsk1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sukegawa Y (2011)	22144909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type|protein/peptide modification:wild type	lsk1 deletion reverses CTD-phosphorylation at Ser2 (of Rpb1) seen in strain overexpressing a constitutively active form of Mei2|lsk1 deletion reverses increase of ste11 RNA expression seen in mei2-L-SATA mutant (constitutively active)	-	BIOGRID
612198	2542080	2541652	278557	278148	SPAC27D7.03c	SPAC24B11.06c	mei2	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sukegawa Y (2011)	22144909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification:partial rescue	sty1 deletion reverses CTD-phosphorylation at Ser2 (of Rpb1) seen in strain overexpressing a constitutively active form of Mei2	-	BIOGRID
612199	2540580	2541672	277106	278168	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC2F3.15	ran1	lsk1	pat1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sukegawa Y (2011)	22144909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type	lsk1 deletion reverses increase of ste11 RNA expression seen in pat1-114 mutant	-	BIOGRID
612200	2540580	2542080	277106	278557	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC27D7.03c	ran1	mei2	pat1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sukegawa Y (2011)	22144909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type	mei2 deletion reverses increase of ste11 RNA expression seen in pat1-114 mutant	-	BIOGRID
612201	2539555	2540258	276116	276789	SPCC4B3.08	SPBC32C12.02	lsg1	ste11	-	aff1|stex	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sukegawa Y (2011)	22144909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:wild type|sporulation efficiency:wild type	ste11 overexpression rescues defects in mating and sporulation in lsg1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
612202	2541672	2540258	278168	276789	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC32C12.02	lsk1	ste11	-	aff1|stex	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sukegawa Y (2011)	22144909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:wild type|sporulation efficiency:wild type	ste11 overexpression rescues defects in mating and sporulation in lsk1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
612203	2540879	2540258	277396	276789	SPBC530.13	SPBC32C12.02	lsc1	ste11	-	aff1|stex	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sukegawa Y (2011)	22144909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:wild type|sporulation efficiency:wild type	ste11 overexpression rescues defects in mating and sporulation in lsc1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
614248	2540718	2540458	277241	276986	SPBC3H7.15	SPBC29A10.14	hhp1	rec8	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Rumpf C (2010)	20581463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
614252	2541957	2539205	278444	275775	SPAC23C11.16	SPCC4B3.15	plo1	mid1	-	dmf1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Almonacid M (2011)	21376600	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
615358	2543441	2542635	279861	279089	SPAC821.12	SPAC24H6.09	orb6	gef1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Das M (2009)	19646873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|cellular morphology|heat sensitivity	Overexpression of gef1 results in complete loss of cell polarity in an orb6 mutant at the semi-permissive temperature	-	BIOGRID
632579	2539869	2542035	276415	278517	SPBC11B10.09	SPAP8A3.04c	cdc2	hsp9	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	scf1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ahn J (2011)	22182414	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	hsp9 overexpression rescues growth of cdc2 mutant at 32 degrees	-	BIOGRID
632602	2538988	2543019	275562	279455	SPCC188.11	SPAC57A10.03	prp45	cyp1	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	cyp2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Skruzny M (2001)	11690648	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
632603	2543019	2538988	279455	275562	SPAC57A10.03	SPCC188.11	cyp1	prp45	cyp2	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	Two-hybrid	physical	Skruzny M (2001)	11690648	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
632889	2541158	9407016	277673	1028379	SPBC660.13c	SPNCRNA.214	ssb1	ter1	rad11|rpa1	SPNG585	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Luciano P (2012)	22354040	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
632890	2540492	9407016	277020	1028379	SPBC2D10.13	SPNCRNA.214	est1	ter1	-	SPNG585	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Luciano P (2012)	22354040	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
632891	2541158	2540719	277673	277242	SPBC660.13c	SPBC216.05	ssb1	rad3	rad11|rpa1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Luciano P (2012)	22354040	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	double mutants show a synergistic reduction in telomere length	-	BIOGRID
632892	2542244	2540719	278714	277242	SPAC19G12.13c	SPBC216.05	poz1	rad3	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Luciano P (2012)	22354040	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:wild type	mutation of rad11 or rad3 suppresses the telomere elongation seen in a poz1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
632893	2542244	2541158	278714	277673	SPAC19G12.13c	SPBC660.13c	poz1	ssb1	-	rad11|rpa1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Luciano P (2012)	22354040	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:wild type	mutation of rad11 or rad3 suppresses the telomere elongation seen in a poz1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
635437	2540990	2540990	277506	277506	SPBC36B7.06c	SPBC36B7.06c	mug20	mug20	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Estreicher A (2012)	22362333	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635438	2540990	2542389	277506	278853	SPBC36B7.06c	SPAC17A5.18c	mug20	rec25	-	mug19	Two-hybrid	physical	Estreicher A (2012)	22362333	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635439	2541688	2540064	278184	276602	SPAC25G10.04c	SPBC1718.02	rec10	hop1	rec20	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Estreicher A (2012)	22362333	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635440	2541688	2542389	278184	278853	SPAC25G10.04c	SPAC17A5.18c	rec10	rec25	rec20	mug19	Two-hybrid	physical	Estreicher A (2012)	22362333	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635441	2540064	2541688	276602	278184	SPBC1718.02	SPAC25G10.04c	hop1	rec10	-	rec20	Two-hybrid	physical	Estreicher A (2012)	22362333	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635442	2538848	2539050	275429	275623	SPCC613.12c	SPCC11E10.08	raf1	rik1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Buscaino A (2012)	22319459	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635443	2538930	2538848	275506	275429	SPCC188.13c	SPCC613.12c	dcr1	raf1	SPCC584.10c	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Buscaino A (2012)	22319459	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
635444	2538930	2538848	275506	275429	SPCC188.13c	SPCC613.12c	dcr1	raf1	SPCC584.10c	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Buscaino A (2012)	22319459	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
635445	2539050	2538848	275623	275429	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC613.12c	rik1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Two-hybrid	physical	Buscaino A (2012)	22319459	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635446	2538848	2540825	275429	277343	SPCC613.12c	SPBC428.08c	raf1	clr4	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Buscaino A (2012)	22319459	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635447	2539420	2538848	275985	275429	SPCC970.07c	SPCC613.12c	raf2	raf1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Buscaino A (2012)	22319459	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635448	2539050	2540825	275623	277343	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC428.08c	rik1	clr4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Buscaino A (2012)	22319459	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635449	2541372	2539050	277883	275623	SPBP8B7.28c	SPCC11E10.08	stc1	rik1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Buscaino A (2012)	22319459	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635464	2539568	2541590	276128	278087	SPCC663.05c	SPAC57A10.02	cia1	cdr2	asf1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tanae K (2012)	22291963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
635465	2539568	2541341	276128	277852	SPCC663.05c	SPBP35G2.05c	cia1	cki2	asf1	sst3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tanae K (2012)	22291963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
635466	2539568	2542442	276128	278904	SPCC663.05c	SPACUNK12.02c	cia1	cmk1	asf1	CaMK-I|SPAC25D11.02C	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tanae K (2012)	22291963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
635467	2539568	2539847	276128	276395	SPCC663.05c	SPBC530.14c	cia1	dsk1	asf1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tanae K (2012)	22291963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
635468	2539568	2540792	276128	277311	SPCC663.05c	SPBC4F6.06	cia1	kin1	asf1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tanae K (2012)	22291963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
635469	2539568	2541672	276128	278168	SPCC663.05c	SPAC2F3.15	cia1	lsk1	asf1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tanae K (2012)	22291963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
635470	2539568	2543071	276128	279504	SPCC663.05c	SPAC3C7.06c	cia1	pit1	asf1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tanae K (2012)	22291963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
635471	2539568	2542804	276128	279252	SPCC663.05c	SPAC29A4.16	cia1	hal4	asf1	ppk10|sat4	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tanae K (2012)	22291963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
635472	2539568	2539653	276128	276208	SPCC663.05c	SPBC16E9.13	cia1	ksp1	asf1	ppk20	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tanae K (2012)	22291963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
635473	2539568	2539807	276128	276357	SPCC663.05c	SPBC1778.10c	cia1	ppk21	asf1	SPBC4C3.11	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tanae K (2012)	22291963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
635474	2539568	2542741	276128	279191	SPCC663.05c	SPAC15A10.13	cia1	ppk3	asf1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tanae K (2012)	22291963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
635475	2539568	2542776	276128	279225	SPCC663.05c	SPAC167.01	cia1	ire1	asf1	ppk4	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tanae K (2012)	22291963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
635476	2539568	2541663	276128	278159	SPCC663.05c	SPAC22G7.08	cia1	ppk8	asf1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tanae K (2012)	22291963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
635477	2539568	2541867	276128	278357	SPCC663.05c	SPAC22E12.14c	cia1	sck2	asf1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tanae K (2012)	22291963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
635478	2539568	2542988	276128	279426	SPCC663.05c	SPAC1006.09	cia1	win1	asf1	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tanae K (2012)	22291963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
635479	2539568	2539087	276128	275659	SPCC663.05c	SPCC1259.13	cia1	chk1	asf1	rad27	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tanae K (2012)	22291963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
635480	2539568	2542395	276128	278859	SPCC663.05c	SPAC1805.05	cia1	cki3	asf1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tanae K (2012)	22291963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
635481	2539568	2541473	276128	277975	SPCC663.05c	SPAC2C4.14c	cia1	ppk11	asf1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tanae K (2012)	22291963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
635482	2539568	2540719	276128	277242	SPCC663.05c	SPBC216.05	cia1	rad3	asf1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tanae K (2012)	22291963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
635496	2539568	2542467	276128	278928	SPCC663.05c	SPAC1834.04	cia1	hht1	asf1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tanae K (2012)	22291963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635497	2539568	2541220	276128	277734	SPCC663.05c	SPBC8D2.04	cia1	hht2	asf1	h3.2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tanae K (2012)	22291963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635498	2539568	2539804	276128	276354	SPCC663.05c	SPBC1105.11c	cia1	hht3	asf1	h3.3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tanae K (2012)	22291963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635499	2539568	2540895	276128	277411	SPCC663.05c	SPBC577.15c	cia1	sim3	asf1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Tanae K (2012)	22291963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
635500	2539568	2540895	276128	277411	SPCC663.05c	SPBC577.15c	cia1	sim3	asf1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tanae K (2012)	22291963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
635501	2541975	2541899	278460	278389	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC22E12.11c	cdc15	set3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Rentas S (2012)	22347452	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
635502	2541975	2541792	278460	278283	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC22E12.19	cdc15	snt1	-	SPAC2E12.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Rentas S (2012)	22347452	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
635503	2541975	2538701	278460	275286	SPAC20G8.05c	SPCC1235.09	cdc15	hif2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Rentas S (2012)	22347452	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
635504	2541975	2541899	278460	278389	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC22E12.11c	cdc15	set3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Rentas S (2012)	22347452	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635505	2541975	2541792	278460	278283	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC22E12.19	cdc15	snt1	-	SPAC2E12.01	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Rentas S (2012)	22347452	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
635506	2541975	2538701	278460	275286	SPAC20G8.05c	SPCC1235.09	cdc15	hif2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Rentas S (2012)	22347452	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
635635	2541792	2541899	278283	278389	SPAC22E12.19	SPAC22E12.11c	snt1	set3	SPAC2E12.01	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rentas S (2012)	22347452	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis|septum formation	-	-	BIOGRID
635636	2541792	2538701	278283	275286	SPAC22E12.19	SPCC1235.09	snt1	hif2	SPAC2E12.01	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rentas S (2012)	22347452	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis|septum formation	-	-	BIOGRID
635637	2541899	2542358	278389	278823	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC1782.09c	set3	clp1	-	flp1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rentas S (2012)	22347452	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis|septum formation	-	-	BIOGRID
635638	2541899	2541672	278389	278168	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC2F3.15	set3	lsk1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rentas S (2012)	22347452	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis|septum formation	-	-	BIOGRID
635639	2541899	2538701	278389	275286	SPAC22E12.11c	SPCC1235.09	set3	hif2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Rentas S (2012)	22347452	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635640	2541792	2538701	278283	275286	SPAC22E12.19	SPCC1235.09	snt1	hif2	SPAC2E12.01	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Rentas S (2012)	22347452	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635641	2541792	2541899	278283	278389	SPAC22E12.19	SPAC22E12.11c	snt1	set3	SPAC2E12.01	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Rentas S (2012)	22347452	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635644	2539352	2540821	275918	277339	SPCC188.07	SPBC800.03	ccq1	clr3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yamazaki H (2012)	22302936	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635645	2539209	2539352	275779	275918	SPCC23B6.03c	SPCC188.07	tel1	ccq1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Yamazaki H (2012)	22302936	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635646	2540719	2539352	277242	275918	SPBC216.05	SPCC188.07	rad3	ccq1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Yamazaki H (2012)	22302936	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635706	2540601	9407016	277127	1028379	SPBC29A3.14c	SPNCRNA.214	trt1	ter1	-	SPNG585	Protein-RNA	physical	Yamazaki H (2012)	22302936	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635707	2539352	9407016	275918	1028379	SPCC188.07	SPNCRNA.214	ccq1	ter1	-	SPNG585	Protein-RNA	physical	Yamazaki H (2012)	22302936	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635708	2541193	3361470	277707	280546	SPBC776.02c	SPAC3G9.01	dis2	nsk1	bws1|sds1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635709	2541193	2539497	277707	276060	SPBC776.02c	SPCC895.07	dis2	alp14	bws1|sds1	mtc1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635710	2541193	2543341	277707	279764	SPBC776.02c	SPAC8E11.07c	dis2	alp31	bws1|sds1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635711	2541193	2541270	277707	277784	SPBC776.02c	SPBC902.02c	dis2	ctf18	bws1|sds1	chl12	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635712	2541193	2542029	277707	278511	SPBC776.02c	SPAC8E11.02c	dis2	rad24	bws1|sds1	anr5|sam4	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635713	2541193	2540884	277707	277401	SPBC776.02c	SPBC19C2.14	dis2	smd3	bws1|sds1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635714	2541193	2542879	277707	279324	SPBC776.02c	SPAC13G7.07	dis2	arb2	bws1|sds1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635715	2541193	2541123	277707	277638	SPBC776.02c	SPBC651.09c	dis2	prf1	bws1|sds1	SPBC651.09c|rtf1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635716	2541193	2540272	277707	276803	SPBC776.02c	SPBC31F10.09c	dis2	nut2	bws1|sds1	med10	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635717	2541193	2543580	277707	279995	SPBC776.02c	SPAC644.14c	dis2	rad51	bws1|sds1	rhp51	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635718	2541193	2542967	277707	279407	SPBC776.02c	SPAC12B10.12c	dis2	rhp41	bws1|sds1	rhp4a	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635719	2541193	2543616	277707	280030	SPBC776.02c	SPAC4A8.09c	dis2	cwf21	bws1|sds1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635720	2541193	2539395	277707	275960	SPBC776.02c	SPCC663.11	dis2	saf1	bws1|sds1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635721	2541193	2540911	277707	277427	SPBC776.02c	SPBC651.10	dis2	nse5	bws1|sds1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635722	2541193	2541512	277707	278013	SPBC776.02c	SPAC11E3.08c	dis2	nse6	bws1|sds1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635723	2541193	2541531	277707	278031	SPBC776.02c	SPAC25A8.01c	dis2	fft3	bws1|sds1	snf2SR	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635724	2541193	2540764	277707	277284	SPBC776.02c	SPBC19C7.02	dis2	ubr1	bws1|sds1	SPBC32F12.14	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635725	2541193	2540749	277707	277271	SPBC776.02c	SPBC4B4.03	dis2	rsc1	bws1|sds1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635726	2541193	2540219	277707	276752	SPBC776.02c	SPBC31F10.13c	dis2	hip1	bws1|sds1	hir1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635727	2541193	2543198	277707	279627	SPBC776.02c	SPAC31A2.11c	dis2	cuf1	bws1|sds1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635728	2541193	2543563	277707	279979	SPBC776.02c	SPAC664.02c	dis2	arp8	bws1|sds1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635729	2541193	2542922	277707	279363	SPBC776.02c	SPAC1142.07c	dis2	vps32	bws1|sds1	snf7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635730	2541193	2542585	277707	279040	SPBC776.02c	SPAC31A2.13c	dis2	sft1	bws1|sds1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635731	2541193	2541818	277707	278309	SPBC776.02c	SPAC11G7.02	dis2	pub1	bws1|sds1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635732	2541193	2541136	277707	277651	SPBC776.02c	SPBC691.04	dis2	SPBC691.04	bws1|sds1	pi031|SPACTOKYO_453.03c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635733	2541193	2540235	277707	276767	SPBC776.02c	SPBC336.13c	dis2	SPBC336.13c	bws1|sds1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635734	2541193	2540404	277707	276932	SPBC776.02c	SPBC25D12.06	dis2	SPBC25D12.06	bws1|sds1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635735	2541193	2538798	277707	275379	SPBC776.02c	SPCC1322.01	dis2	rpm1	bws1|sds1	SPCC23B6.06|par1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635736	2541193	2542493	277707	278952	SPBC776.02c	SPAC1B2.04	dis2	cox6	bws1|sds1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635737	2541193	2543235	277707	279663	SPBC776.02c	SPAC56F8.04c	dis2	ppt1	bws1|sds1	coq2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635738	2541193	2542816	277707	279263	SPBC776.02c	SPAC4G8.11c	dis2	atp10	bws1|sds1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635739	2541193	2539510	277707	276072	SPBC776.02c	SPCC4G3.04c	dis2	coq5	bws1|sds1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635740	2541193	2540995	277707	277511	SPBC776.02c	SPBC337.16	dis2	cho1	bws1|sds1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635741	2541193	2540538	277707	277065	SPBC776.02c	SPBC26H8.03	dis2	cho2	bws1|sds1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635742	2541193	2542981	277707	279419	SPBC776.02c	SPAC824.02	dis2	bst1	bws1|sds1	SPAC824.02	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635743	2541193	2540912	277707	277428	SPBC776.02c	SPBC557.02c	dis2	SPBC557.02c	bws1|sds1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635744	2541193	2539001	277707	275575	SPBC776.02c	SPCC1494.08c	dis2	SPCC1494.08c	bws1|sds1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635745	2541193	2540938	277707	277454	SPBC776.02c	SPBC365.14c	dis2	uge1	bws1|sds1	gal10	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635746	2541193	3361470	277707	280546	SPBC776.02c	SPAC3G9.01	dis2	nsk1	bws1|sds1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle passage through the metaphase-anaphase transition|chromosome segregation	-	-	BIOGRID
635747	2541193	2542358	277707	278823	SPBC776.02c	SPAC1782.09c	dis2	clp1	bws1|sds1	flp1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation	-	-	BIOGRID
635748	3361470	2540589	280546	277115	SPAC3G9.01	SPBC20F10.06	nsk1	mad2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation	-	-	BIOGRID
635749	3361470	2540589	280546	277115	SPAC3G9.01	SPBC20F10.06	nsk1	mad2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle passage through the metaphase-anaphase transition:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
635750	3361470	2539219	280546	275789	SPAC3G9.01	SPCC1795.01c	nsk1	mad3	-	SPCC895.02	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle passage through the metaphase-anaphase transition:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
635751	3361036	2541193	280112	277707	SPCC320.13c	SPBC776.02c	ark1	dis2	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	bws1|sds1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2011)	21965289	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
635752	2542067	2540077	278544	276615	SPAC23D3.01	SPBC17D11.04c	pdp3	nto1	SPAC23D3.01	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635753	2542067	2542170	278544	278645	SPAC23D3.01	SPAC17G8.13c	pdp3	mst2	SPAC23D3.01	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635754	2542067	2541729	278544	278223	SPAC23D3.01	SPAC22H12.02	pdp3	tfg3	SPAC23D3.01	taf14	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635755	2542067	2543317	278544	279741	SPAC23D3.01	SPAC823.14	pdp3	ptf1	SPAC23D3.01	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635756	2542067	2542157	278544	278633	SPAC23D3.01	SPAC6F6.09	pdp3	eaf6	SPAC23D3.01	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635757	2542067	2539706	278544	276259	SPAC23D3.01	SPBC16G5.13	pdp3	ptf2	SPAC23D3.01	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635758	2542067	2540077	278544	276615	SPAC23D3.01	SPBC17D11.04c	pdp3	nto1	SPAC23D3.01	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635759	2542067	2542170	278544	278645	SPAC23D3.01	SPAC17G8.13c	pdp3	mst2	SPAC23D3.01	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635760	2542067	2541729	278544	278223	SPAC23D3.01	SPAC22H12.02	pdp3	tfg3	SPAC23D3.01	taf14	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635761	2542067	2543317	278544	279741	SPAC23D3.01	SPAC823.14	pdp3	ptf1	SPAC23D3.01	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635762	2542067	2542157	278544	278633	SPAC23D3.01	SPAC6F6.09	pdp3	eaf6	SPAC23D3.01	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635763	2542067	2539706	278544	276259	SPAC23D3.01	SPBC16G5.13	pdp3	ptf2	SPAC23D3.01	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635764	2542170	2540077	278645	276615	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC17D11.04c	mst2	nto1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635765	2542170	2542067	278645	278544	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC23D3.01	mst2	pdp3	-	SPAC23D3.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635766	2542170	2541729	278645	278223	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC22H12.02	mst2	tfg3	-	taf14	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635767	2542170	2543317	278645	279741	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC823.14	mst2	ptf1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635768	2542170	2542157	278645	278633	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC6F6.09	mst2	eaf6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635769	2542170	2539706	278645	276259	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC16G5.13	mst2	ptf2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635770	2542513	2542170	278971	278645	SPAC1952.05	SPAC17G8.13c	gcn5	mst2	kat2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein activity	Histone H3 acetylation	-	BIOGRID
635771	2542513	2542170	278971	278645	SPAC1952.05	SPAC17G8.13c	gcn5	mst2	kat2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|radiation resistance|resistance to chemicals	MMS|bleomycin|infrared	-	BIOGRID
635772	2542513	2540077	278971	276615	SPAC1952.05	SPBC17D11.04c	gcn5	nto1	kat2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|radiation resistance|resistance to chemicals	MMS|bleomycin|infrared	-	BIOGRID
635773	2542513	2539706	278971	276259	SPAC1952.05	SPBC16G5.13	gcn5	ptf2	kat2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|radiation resistance|resistance to chemicals	MMS|bleomycin|infrared	-	BIOGRID
635774	2542513	2543685	278971	280099	SPAC1952.05	SPAC3C7.03c	gcn5	rad55	kat2	rhp55	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals	bleomycin|triple mutant	-	BIOGRID
635775	2542170	2543685	278645	280099	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC3C7.03c	mst2	rad55	-	rhp55	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals	bleomycin|triple mutant	-	BIOGRID
635776	2542513	2542007	278971	278490	SPAC1952.05	SPAC20H4.07	gcn5	rad57	kat2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals	bleomycin|triple mutant	-	BIOGRID
635777	2542170	2542007	278645	278490	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC20H4.07	mst2	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals	bleomycin|triple mutant	-	BIOGRID
635778	2542467	2539999	278928	276543	SPAC1834.04	SPBC1734.15	hht1	rsc4	-	brd1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635779	2541220	2539999	277734	276543	SPBC8D2.04	SPBC1734.15	hht2	rsc4	h3.2	brd1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635780	2539804	2539999	276354	276543	SPBC1105.11c	SPBC1734.15	hht3	rsc4	h3.3	brd1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635781	2542467	2539999	278928	276543	SPAC1834.04	SPBC1734.15	hht1	rsc4	-	brd1	Protein-peptide	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635782	2541220	2539999	277734	276543	SPBC8D2.04	SPBC1734.15	hht2	rsc4	h3.2	brd1	Protein-peptide	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635783	2539804	2539999	276354	276543	SPBC1105.11c	SPBC1734.15	hht3	rsc4	h3.3	brd1	Protein-peptide	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635784	2542467	2542638	278928	279092	SPAC1834.04	SPAC1250.01	hht1	snf21	-	SPAC29A4.21|brg1	Protein-peptide	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635785	2541220	2542638	277734	279092	SPBC8D2.04	SPAC1250.01	hht2	snf21	h3.2	SPAC29A4.21|brg1	Protein-peptide	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635786	2539804	2542638	276354	279092	SPBC1105.11c	SPAC1250.01	hht3	snf21	h3.3	SPAC29A4.21|brg1	Protein-peptide	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22184112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635794	2540060	2540060	276598	276598	SPBC106.01	SPBC106.01	mph1	mph1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Biochemical Activity	physical	Zich J (2012)	22281223	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635795	2540060	2540589	276598	277115	SPBC106.01	SPBC20F10.06	mph1	mad2	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Zich J (2012)	22281223	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635796	2540320	2540589	276850	277115	SPBC3D6.04c	SPBC20F10.06	mad1	mad2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zich J (2012)	22281223	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635797	2542615	2539219	279069	275789	SPAC19G12.01c	SPCC1795.01c	cut20	mad3	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	SPCC895.02	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zich J (2012)	22281223	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635798	2542615	2540589	279069	277115	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBC20F10.06	cut20	mad2	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zich J (2012)	22281223	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635799	2538736	2540060	275320	276598	SPCC1322.12c	SPBC106.01	bub1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Zich J (2012)	22281223	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation	-	-	BIOGRID
635800	2538736	2540060	275320	276598	SPCC1322.12c	SPBC106.01	bub1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Zich J (2012)	22281223	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	benomyl	-	BIOGRID
635829	2541165	2543240	277680	279668	SPBC776.12c	SPAC694.06c	hsk1	mrc1	cdc7	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Hayano M (2012)	22279046	284812	284812	High Throughput|Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
635830	2541165	2542144	277680	278620	SPBC776.12c	SPAC6F6.17	hsk1	rif1	cdc7	SPAPJ736.01|tap1|tap11	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Hayano M (2012)	22279046	284812	284812	High Throughput|Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	MMS|camptothecin	-	BIOGRID
635831	2541165	2542313	277680	278779	SPBC776.12c	SPAC16A10.07c	hsk1	taz1	cdc7	myb|myb1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Hayano M (2012)	22279046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635832	2542144	2543240	278620	279668	SPAC6F6.17	SPAC694.06c	rif1	mrc1	SPAPJ736.01|tap1|tap11	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hayano M (2012)	22279046	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	deletion of both rif1 and mrc1 synergistically rescue hsk1(-) mutant growth	-	BIOGRID
635833	2541030	2541042	277545	277557	SPBC337.08c	SPBC359.03c	ubi4	aat1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nakase M (2012)	22194353	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	likely ubiquitin conjugate|source of ubiquitin not clear	-	BIOGRID
635834	2542151	2540258	278627	276789	SPAC17A2.09c	SPBC32C12.02	csx1	ste11	-	aff1|stex	Protein-RNA	physical	Matia-Gonzalez AM (2012)	22253882	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635916	2541364	2541378	277875	277889	SPBP8B7.11	SPBP8B7.21	nxt3	ubp3	glp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang CY (2012)	22328580	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635917	2541364	2543309	277875	279733	SPBP8B7.11	SPAPB8E5.06c	nxt3	rpl302	glp1	rpl3-2|rpl3-b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang CY (2012)	22328580	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635918	2541364	2539780	277875	276330	SPBP8B7.11	SPBC1711.06	nxt3	rpl401	glp1	rpl4|rpl4-1|rpl4-2|rpl402	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang CY (2012)	22328580	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635919	2541364	2543553	277875	279970	SPBP8B7.11	SPAC664.05	nxt3	rpl13	glp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang CY (2012)	22328580	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635920	2541364	2542817	277875	279264	SPBP8B7.11	SPAC13G6.02c	nxt3	rps101	glp1	rps1-1|rps3a-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang CY (2012)	22328580	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635921	2541364	2542629	277875	279083	SPBP8B7.11	SPAC24H6.07	nxt3	rps901	glp1	rps9-1|rps9a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang CY (2012)	22328580	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635922	2541378	2541364	277889	277875	SPBP8B7.21	SPBP8B7.11	ubp3	nxt3	-	glp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang CY (2012)	22328580	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635924	2539829	2540565	276378	277092	SPBC17G9.04c	SPBC1D7.04	nup85	mlo3	ptr5	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Watanabe N (2012)	22240020	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
635925	2539829	2539561	276378	276122	SPBC17G9.04c	SPCC576.05	nup85	sac3	ptr5	SPCC576.05	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Watanabe N (2012)	22240020	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
635926	2539829	2541682	276378	278178	SPBC17G9.04c	SPAC15F9.02	nup85	seh1	ptr5	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Watanabe N (2012)	22240020	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
635927	2539829	2539561	276378	276122	SPBC17G9.04c	SPCC576.05	nup85	sac3	ptr5	SPCC576.05	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Watanabe N (2012)	22240020	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA localization	-	-	BIOGRID
635928	2539829	2539741	276378	276293	SPBC17G9.04c	SPBC16A3.05c	nup85	rae1	ptr5	cut21	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Watanabe N (2012)	22240020	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA localization	-	-	BIOGRID
635929	2539829	2539741	276378	276293	SPBC17G9.04c	SPBC16A3.05c	nup85	rae1	ptr5	cut21	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Watanabe N (2012)	22240020	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
635930	2539829	2541185	276378	277699	SPBC17G9.04c	SPBC6B1.07	nup85	prp1	ptr5	zer1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Watanabe N (2012)	22240020	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
635931	2539829	2541686	276378	278182	SPBC17G9.04c	SPAC29E6.02	nup85	prp3	ptr5	SPAC30.06	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Watanabe N (2012)	22240020	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
635933	2539829	2541682	276378	278178	SPBC17G9.04c	SPAC15F9.02	nup85	seh1	ptr5	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Watanabe N (2012)	22240020	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
635934	2539829	2539645	276378	276200	SPBC17G9.04c	SPBC146.07	nup85	prp2	ptr5	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Watanabe N (2012)	22240020	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635935	2539829	2541185	276378	277699	SPBC17G9.04c	SPBC6B1.07	nup85	prp1	ptr5	zer1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Watanabe N (2012)	22240020	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
635937	2541619	2539829	278116	276378	SPAC27F1.09c	SPBC17G9.04c	prp10	nup85	sap155|SF3b155	ptr5	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Watanabe N (2012)	22240020	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
635939	2541755	2543298	278249	279723	SPAC2F7.11	SPAC6B12.15	nrd1	cpc2	msa2	rkp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Satoh R (2012)	22276125	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635949	2539700	2539700	276253	276253	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC1685.15c	klp6	klp6	SPBC649.01c|sot2	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Erent M (2012)	22363481	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
635959	2540201	2540364	276734	276893	SPBC13A2.04c	SPBC29B5.02c	ptr2	isp4	SPBC13A2.04c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kitamura K (2012)	22226946	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient uptake|vegetative growth	double mutants show retarded growth when soy peptides are used as the sole nitrogen source	-	BIOGRID
636019	2540954	2539088	277470	275660	SPBC337.13c	SPCC777.05	gtr1	gtr2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Valbuena N (2012)	22344254	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
636020	2540954	2542404	277470	278868	SPBC337.13c	SPAC57A7.11	gtr1	mip1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Valbuena N (2012)	22344254	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
636021	2541859	2540954	278349	277470	SPAC23H4.14	SPBC337.13c	vam6	gtr1	vps39	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Valbuena N (2012)	22344254	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein activity|viability	expression of an active form or gtr1, gtr1Q61L, rescues TORC1 activity and viability in vam6 cells	-	BIOGRID
636022	2541859	2540954	278349	277470	SPAC23H4.14	SPBC337.13c	vam6	gtr1	vps39	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Valbuena N (2012)	22344254	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
636023	2541859	2540954	278349	277470	SPAC23H4.14	SPBC337.13c	vam6	gtr1	vps39	-	Co-localization	physical	Valbuena N (2012)	22344254	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
636024	2540954	2540720	277470	277243	SPBC337.13c	SPBC216.07c	gtr1	tor2	-	SPBC646.01c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Valbuena N (2012)	22344254	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:wild type	Overexpression of Tor2 rescues the mating defect seen in a gtr1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
636025	2540954	2540720	277470	277243	SPBC337.13c	SPBC216.07c	gtr1	tor2	-	SPBC646.01c	Co-localization	physical	Valbuena N (2012)	22344254	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
636026	2540954	2539088	277470	275660	SPBC337.13c	SPCC777.05	gtr1	gtr2	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Valbuena N (2012)	22344254	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
636038	2540627	2540695	277153	277219	SPBC25H2.13c	SPBC19G7.01c	cdc20	msh2	pol2	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Miyabe I (2011)	22144917	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency	-	-	BIOGRID
636040	2540354	2542463	276883	278924	SPBC29A3.13	SPAC1834.03c	pdp1	hhf1	-	h4.1	Protein-peptide	physical	Qiu Y (2011)	22150589	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
636041	2540354	2541200	276883	277714	SPBC29A3.13	SPBC8D2.03c	pdp1	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Protein-peptide	physical	Qiu Y (2011)	22150589	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
636042	2540354	2539991	276883	276535	SPBC29A3.13	SPBC1105.12	pdp1	hhf3	-	h4.3	Protein-peptide	physical	Qiu Y (2011)	22150589	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
636045	2541155	2538875	277670	275454	SPBC6B1.04	SPCC962.02c	mde4	bir1	-	SPCP31B10.10c|cut17|pbh1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Choi SH (2012)	22264609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
636046	2541155	2540250	277670	276782	SPBC6B1.04	SPBC336.15	mde4	pic1	-	SPBC685.01	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Choi SH (2012)	22264609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
636047	2541633	2538875	278129	275454	SPAC664.01c	SPCC962.02c	swi6	bir1	SPAC824.10c	SPCP31B10.10c|cut17|pbh1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Choi SH (2012)	22264609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
636048	2541633	2540250	278129	276782	SPAC664.01c	SPBC336.15	swi6	pic1	SPAC824.10c	SPBC685.01	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Choi SH (2012)	22264609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
636049	2541155	3361036	277670	280112	SPBC6B1.04	SPCC320.13c	mde4	ark1	-	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Choi SH (2012)	22264609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
636050	2541155	3361036	277670	280112	SPBC6B1.04	SPCC320.13c	mde4	ark1	-	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Choi SH (2012)	22264609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
636051	2541155	2542358	277670	278823	SPBC6B1.04	SPAC1782.09c	mde4	clp1	-	flp1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Choi SH (2012)	22264609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:partial rescue|spindle morphology:partial rescue|spindle morphology:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
636052	2541155	2540880	277670	277397	SPBC6B1.04	SPBC582.03	mde4	cdc13	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Choi SH (2012)	22264609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
636053	2541155	2542732	277670	279182	SPBC6B1.04	SPAC25G10.07c	mde4	cut7	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Choi SH (2012)	22264609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
636054	2541633	2542732	278129	279182	SPAC664.01c	SPAC25G10.07c	swi6	cut7	SPAC824.10c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Choi SH (2012)	22264609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:partial rescue|spindle morphology:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
636055	2541633	3361036	278129	280112	SPAC664.01c	SPCC320.13c	swi6	ark1	SPAC824.10c	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Choi SH (2012)	22264609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
636056	2541633	2542358	278129	278823	SPAC664.01c	SPAC1782.09c	swi6	clp1	SPAC824.10c	flp1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Choi SH (2012)	22264609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
636057	2541633	2539778	278129	276328	SPAC664.01c	SPBC15D4.01c	swi6	klp9	SPAC824.10c	SPBC2D10.21c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Choi SH (2012)	22264609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:partial rescue|spindle morphology:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
636058	2541155	2539778	277670	276328	SPBC6B1.04	SPBC15D4.01c	mde4	klp9	-	SPBC2D10.21c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Choi SH (2012)	22264609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:partial rescue|spindle morphology:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
636059	2541633	2542358	278129	278823	SPAC664.01c	SPAC1782.09c	swi6	clp1	SPAC824.10c	flp1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Choi SH (2012)	22264609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation	-	-	BIOGRID
636060	2541155	2542358	277670	278823	SPBC6B1.04	SPAC1782.09c	mde4	clp1	-	flp1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Choi SH (2012)	22264609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation	-	-	BIOGRID
636061	2541155	2541633	277670	278129	SPBC6B1.04	SPAC664.01c	mde4	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Choi SH (2012)	22264609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spindle morphology:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
636062	2543360	2539778	279782	276328	SPAC664.10	SPBC15D4.01c	klp2	klp9	-	SPBC2D10.21c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Choi SH (2012)	22264609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spindle morphology:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
636063	2541633	3361036	278129	280112	SPAC664.01c	SPCC320.13c	swi6	ark1	SPAC824.10c	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Choi SH (2012)	22264609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
636064	2541633	3361036	278129	280112	SPAC664.01c	SPCC320.13c	swi6	ark1	SPAC824.10c	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Choi SH (2012)	22264609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
636065	3361532	2540350	280608	276879	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC317.01	lkh1	mbx2	kic1	pvg4	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Matsuzawa T (2011)	22180499	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	colony appearance:wild type|flocculation:wild type	adhesion	-	BIOGRID
636071	2541530	2542047	278030	278528	SPAC57A10.10c	SPAC21E11.03c	sla1	pcr1	-	mts2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Cherkasova V (2011)	22160596	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	EMM	-	BIOGRID
636072	2541530	2540473	278030	277001	SPAC57A10.10c	SPBC30D10.10c	sla1	tor1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Cherkasova V (2011)	22160596	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	small molecule transport	-	-	BIOGRID
636073	2541530	2540473	278030	277001	SPAC57A10.10c	SPBC30D10.10c	sla1	tor1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Cherkasova V (2011)	22160596	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	utilization of nitrogen source	-	-	BIOGRID
636074	2541530	2541869	278030	278359	SPAC57A10.10c	SPAC22F3.13	sla1	tsc1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Cherkasova V (2011)	22160596	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	utilization of nitrogen source	-	-	BIOGRID
636075	2541530	2541311	278030	277823	SPAC57A10.10c	SPBP8B7.09c	sla1	los1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Cherkasova V (2011)	22160596	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	utilization of nitrogen source	-	-	BIOGRID
636105	2538846	2542219	275427	278693	SPCC1919.10c	SPAC18G6.03	myo52	ypt3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lo Presti L (2011)	22137473	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
636108	2541620	2540601	278117	277127	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC29A3.14c	rqh1	trt1	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ukimori S (2012)	22313747	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
636109	2539487	2539857	276050	276404	SPCC895.05	SPBC1604.20c	for3	tea2	-	klp4	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Lo Presti L (2011)	22137473	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|cell size	Expression of a tea2-myo52 chimera suppresses the shape and single cell growth seen in a for3 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
636110	2539487	2538846	276050	275427	SPCC895.05	SPCC1919.10c	for3	myo52	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Lo Presti L (2011)	22137473	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|cell size	Expression of a tea2-myo52 chimera suppresses the shape and single cell growth seen in a for3 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
636111	2539642	2538846	276197	275427	SPBC1706.01	SPCC1919.10c	tea4	myo52	wsh3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Lo Presti L (2011)	22137473	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|vegetative growth	double mutants result in cells that are sick and misshapen	-	BIOGRID
636112	2541620	2540601	278117	277127	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC29A3.14c	rqh1	trt1	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ukimori S (2012)	22313747	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	-	-	BIOGRID
636113	9406964	2539418	1028327	275983	SPCC70.12c	SPCC757.07c	ecl1	ctt1	SPNG2611|SPNCRNA.518	cta1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ohtsuka H (2012)	22212525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	deletion of ctt1 inhibits the resistance to H2O2 conferred by overexpression of ecl1, ecl2 or ecl3	-	BIOGRID
636114	9407128	2539418	1028491	275983	SPBP35G2.16c	SPCC757.07c	ecl2	ctt1	SPNGAF61	cta1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ohtsuka H (2012)	22212525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	deletion of ctt1 inhibits the resistance to H2O2 conferred by overexpression of ecl1, ecl2 or ecl3	-	BIOGRID
636115	9407219	2539418	1028582	275983	SPBC8E4.12c	SPCC757.07c	ecl3	ctt1	SPNG1995-96	cta1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ohtsuka H (2012)	22212525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	deletion of ctt1 inhibits the resistance to H2O2 conferred by overexpression of ecl1, ecl2 or ecl3	-	BIOGRID
636116	9406964	2543251	1028327	279679	SPCC70.12c	SPAC3H1.11	ecl1	hsr1	SPNG2611|SPNCRNA.518	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ohtsuka H (2012)	22212525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chronological lifespan:partial rescue	deletion of hsr1 partially blocks the increase in chronological lifespan seen upon over-expression of ecl1, ecl2 or ecl3	-	BIOGRID
636117	9407128	2543251	1028491	279679	SPBP35G2.16c	SPAC3H1.11	ecl2	hsr1	SPNGAF61	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ohtsuka H (2012)	22212525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chronological lifespan:partial rescue	deletion of hsr1 partially blocks the increase in chronological lifespan seen upon over-expression of ecl1, ecl2 or ecl3	-	BIOGRID
636118	9407219	2543251	1028582	279679	SPBC8E4.12c	SPAC3H1.11	ecl3	hsr1	SPNG1995-96	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ohtsuka H (2012)	22212525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chronological lifespan:partial rescue	deletion of hsr1 partially blocks the increase in chronological lifespan seen upon over-expression of ecl1, ecl2 or ecl3	-	BIOGRID
636119	9406964	2541756	1028327	278250	SPCC70.12c	SPAC8C9.14	ecl1	prr1	SPNG2611|SPNCRNA.518	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ohtsuka H (2012)	22212525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chronological lifespan:partial rescue|protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue	deletion of prr1 partially blocks the increase in chronological lifespan and hsr1 protein levels seen upon over-expression of ecl1, ecl2 or ecl3	-	BIOGRID
636120	9407128	2541756	1028491	278250	SPBP35G2.16c	SPAC8C9.14	ecl2	prr1	SPNGAF61	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ohtsuka H (2012)	22212525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chronological lifespan:partial rescue|protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue	deletion of prr1 partially blocks the increase in chronological lifespan and hsr1 protein levels seen upon over-expression of ecl1, ecl2 or ecl3	-	BIOGRID
636121	9407219	2541756	1028582	278250	SPBC8E4.12c	SPAC8C9.14	ecl3	prr1	SPNG1995-96	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ohtsuka H (2012)	22212525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chronological lifespan:partial rescue|protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue	deletion of prr1 partially blocks the increase in chronological lifespan and hsr1 protein levels seen upon over-expression of ecl1, ecl2 or ecl3	-	BIOGRID
636122	2540492	9407016	277020	1028379	SPBC2D10.13	SPNCRNA.214	est1	ter1	-	SPNG585	Protein-RNA	physical	Webb CJ (2012)	22215813	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	three-hybrid	-	BIOGRID
636123	2540601	9407016	277127	1028379	SPBC29A3.14c	SPNCRNA.214	trt1	ter1	-	SPNG585	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Webb CJ (2012)	22215813	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
636124	2540492	9407016	277020	1028379	SPBC2D10.13	SPNCRNA.214	est1	ter1	-	SPNG585	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Webb CJ (2012)	22215813	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
636125	9407016	2539352	1028379	275918	SPNCRNA.214	SPCC188.07	ter1	ccq1	SPNG585	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Webb CJ (2012)	22215813	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	ter1 RNA as bait	-	BIOGRID
636163	2540060	2540320	276598	276850	SPBC106.01	SPBC3D6.04c	mph1	mad1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ito D (2012)	22184248	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
636164	2540060	2540589	276598	277115	SPBC106.01	SPBC20F10.06	mph1	mad2	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ito D (2012)	22184248	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
636165	2540060	2539219	276598	275789	SPBC106.01	SPCC1795.01c	mph1	mad3	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPCC895.02	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ito D (2012)	22184248	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
636166	2540060	2538736	276598	275320	SPBC106.01	SPCC1322.12c	mph1	bub1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ito D (2012)	22184248	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
636167	2540060	2543222	276598	279650	SPBC106.01	SPAC821.08c	mph1	slp1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	cdc20	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ito D (2012)	22184248	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
636212	2539387	2542198	275952	278673	SPCC1840.03	SPAC6F12.09	sal3	rdp1	pse1	rdr1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Park J (2012)	22268381	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
636410	2539857	2543044	276404	279479	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC3C7.12	tea2	tip1	klp4	noc1	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Duncan CD (2011)	22144913	284812	284812	High Throughput|Low Throughput	-	-	-	interaction detected by RIp-chip	-	BIOGRID
636411	5802965	2543563	858103	279979	SPAC11H11.06	SPAC664.02c	arp2	arp8	SPAC22F8.01	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Duncan CD (2011)	22144913	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	interaction detected by RIp-chip	-	BIOGRID
636412	5802965	2541540	858103	278040	SPAC11H11.06	SPAC1071.06	arp2	arp9	SPAC22F8.01	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Duncan CD (2011)	22144913	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	interaction detected by RIp-chip	-	BIOGRID
636413	2541496	2542638	277998	279092	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC1250.01	arp42	snf21	arp4	SPAC29A4.21|brg1	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Duncan CD (2011)	22144913	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	interaction detected by RIp-chip	-	BIOGRID
636414	2541496	2538881	277998	275460	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC1620.14c	arp42	snf22	arp4	SPCC830.01c	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Duncan CD (2011)	22144913	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	interaction detected by RIp-chip	-	BIOGRID
636415	2539564	2541318	276125	277830	SPCC550.12	SPBP23A10.08	arp6	alp5	-	arp4	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Duncan CD (2011)	22144913	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	interaction detected by RIp-chip	-	BIOGRID
636416	2543563	3361566	279979	280642	SPAC664.02c	SPAC29B12.01	arp8	ino80	-	SPAC3G6.12	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Duncan CD (2011)	22144913	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	interaction detected by RIp-chip	-	BIOGRID
636417	2541540	2542638	278040	279092	SPAC1071.06	SPAC1250.01	arp9	snf21	-	SPAC29A4.21|brg1	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Duncan CD (2011)	22144913	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	interaction detected by RIp-chip	-	BIOGRID
636418	2541540	2538881	278040	275460	SPAC1071.06	SPCC1620.14c	arp9	snf22	-	SPCC830.01c	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Duncan CD (2011)	22144913	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	interaction detected by RIp-chip	-	BIOGRID
636419	2540329	2542047	276859	278528	SPBC29B5.01	SPAC21E11.03c	atf1	pcr1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	mts2	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Duncan CD (2011)	22144913	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	interaction detected by RIp-chip	-	BIOGRID
636420	2539869	2539640	276415	276195	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC32F12.09	cdc2	rum1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Duncan CD (2011)	22144913	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	interaction detected by RIp-chip	-	BIOGRID
636421	2539869	2540013	276415	276557	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC14C8.07c	cdc2	cdc18	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Duncan CD (2011)	22144913	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	interaction detected by RIp-chip	-	BIOGRID
636422	2540939	2541819	277455	278310	SPBC4.07c	SPAC6G9.08	rpt2	ubp6	mts2	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Duncan CD (2011)	22144913	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	interaction detected by RIp-chip	-	BIOGRID
636423	2540939	2540481	277455	277009	SPBC4.07c	SPBC2D10.12	rpt2	rhp23	mts2	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Duncan CD (2011)	22144913	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	interaction detected by RIp-chip	-	BIOGRID
636424	2540025	3361455	276569	280531	SPBC16G5.01	SPAC1782.01	rpn12	ecm29	SPBC342.07|mts3	SPAPYUG7.07	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Duncan CD (2011)	22144913	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	interaction detected by RIp-chip	-	BIOGRID
636425	2540025	2540980	276569	277496	SPBC16G5.01	SPBC342.04	rpn12	rpn1301	SPBC342.07|mts3	rpn13|rpn13a	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Duncan CD (2011)	22144913	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	interaction detected by RIp-chip	-	BIOGRID
636426	2540025	2539182	276569	275753	SPBC16G5.01	SPCC16A11.16c	rpn12	rpn1302	SPBC342.07|mts3	rpn13|rpn13b	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Duncan CD (2011)	22144913	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	interaction detected by RIp-chip	-	BIOGRID
636427	2540522	2540798	277050	277317	SPBC3B9.08c	SPBC19C7.01	mnh1	mni1	-	SPBC32F12.13c	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Duncan CD (2011)	22144913	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	interaction detected by RIp-chip	-	BIOGRID
636428	2541652	2542200	278148	278675	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC19D5.01	sty1	pyp2	phh1|spc1	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Duncan CD (2011)	22144913	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	interaction detected by RIp-chip	-	BIOGRID
636429	2541652	2543139	278148	279571	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC12G12.03	sty1	cip2	phh1|spc1	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Duncan CD (2011)	22144913	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	interaction detected by RIp-chip	-	BIOGRID
637309	2543042	2540072	279477	276610	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC16H5.07c	paa1	ppa2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2012)	22403715	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
637310	2543042	2542052	279477	278531	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC823.15	paa1	ppa1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2012)	22403715	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
637311	2543042	2539379	279477	275945	SPAP8A3.09c	SPCC188.02	paa1	par1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2012)	22403715	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
637312	2543042	2542349	279477	278814	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC1782.05	paa1	ypa2	-	SPAC1782.05|pta2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2012)	22403715	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
637313	2543042	2541346	279477	277857	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBP8B7.08c	paa1	ppm1	-	SPBP8B7.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2012)	22403715	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
637314	2543042	2542869	279477	279314	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC140.02	paa1	gar2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2012)	22403715	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
637315	2543042	2540547	279477	277074	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC32F12.11	paa1	tdh1	-	gpd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2012)	22403715	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
637316	2543042	2538902	279477	275480	SPAP8A3.09c	SPCC13B11.01	paa1	adh1	-	adh	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2012)	22403715	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
637317	2543042	2540479	279477	277007	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC2D10.10c	paa1	fib1	-	fib|nop1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2012)	22403715	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
637318	2543042	2540767	279477	277287	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC19C2.07	paa1	fba1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2012)	22403715	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
637573	2543580	2539403	279995	275968	SPAC644.14c	SPCC736.11	rad51	ago1	rhp51	csp9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Zaratiegui M (2011)	22002604	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
637574	2543580	2538930	279995	275506	SPAC644.14c	SPCC188.13c	rad51	dcr1	rhp51	SPCC584.10c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Zaratiegui M (2011)	22002604	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
637576	2543168	2541957	279599	278444	SPAC31A2.16	SPAC23C11.16	gef2	plo1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ye Y (2012)	22298427	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis|septum formation	double mutants show increased defects in contractile ring formation	-	BIOGRID
637577	2543168	2539205	279599	275775	SPAC31A2.16	SPCC4B3.15	gef2	mid1	-	dmf1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ye Y (2012)	22298427	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
637578	2543168	2541590	279599	278087	SPAC31A2.16	SPAC57A10.02	gef2	cdr2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ye Y (2012)	22298427	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis:partial rescue|septum formation:partial rescue	expression of a mid1-cdr2 fusion protein partially rescues the septum formation defects in a gef2/plo1 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
637579	2541957	2541590	278444	278087	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC57A10.02	plo1	cdr2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ye Y (2012)	22298427	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis:partial rescue|septum formation:partial rescue	expression of a mid1-cdr2 fusion protein partially rescues the septum formation defects in a gef2/plo1 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
637580	2541957	2539205	278444	275775	SPAC23C11.16	SPCC4B3.15	plo1	mid1	-	dmf1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ye Y (2012)	22298427	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis:partial rescue|septum formation:partial rescue	expression of a mid1-cdr2 fusion protein partially rescues the septum formation defects in a gef2/plo1 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
637581	2543168	2539205	279599	275775	SPAC31A2.16	SPCC4B3.15	gef2	mid1	-	dmf1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ye Y (2012)	22298427	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis:partial rescue|septum formation:partial rescue	expression of a mid1-cdr2 fusion protein partially rescues the septum formation defects in a gef2/plo1 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
637582	2539205	2543168	275775	279599	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC31A2.16	mid1	gef2	dmf1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ye Y (2012)	22298427	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
637583	2543576	2543168	279991	279599	SPAC4A8.05c	SPAC31A2.16	myp2	gef2	myo3	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ye Y (2012)	22298427	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis|septum formation	double mutants show increased defects in septum formation	-	BIOGRID
637585	2541599	2543168	278096	279599	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC31A2.16	sid2	gef2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ye Y (2012)	22298427	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of gef2 partially rescues sensitivity to heat in a sid2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
637586	2539149	2543168	275721	279599	SPCC1739.11c	SPAC31A2.16	cdc11	gef2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ye Y (2012)	22298427	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	deletion of gef2 rescues sensitivity to heat in a cdc11 mutant	-	BIOGRID
637587	2539513	2543576	276075	279991	SPCC645.05c	SPAC4A8.05c	myo2	myp2	rng5	myo3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yan H (2012)	22275432	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
642546	2542140	2541756	278616	278250	SPAC1783.07c	SPAC8C9.14	pap1	prr1	caf3	-	Co-localization	physical	Calvo IA (2012)	22344694	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	interaction determined by ChIP	-	BIOGRID
642547	2541756	2542140	278250	278616	SPAC8C9.14	SPAC1783.07c	prr1	pap1	-	caf3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Calvo IA (2012)	22344694	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
642587	2541071	2539087	277586	275659	SPBC582.05c	SPCC1259.13	brc1	chk1	-	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bass KL (2012)	22366461	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
642588	2540470	2541071	276998	277586	SPBC29A10.15	SPBC582.05c	orc1	brc1	cdc30|orp1|rid1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bass KL (2012)	22366461	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to HU and reduced formation of Rad52 foci compared to a brc1 single mutant	-	BIOGRID
642589	2539020	2541071	275593	277586	SPCC5E4.06	SPBC582.05c	smc6	brc1	rad18	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Bass KL (2012)	22366461	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	overexpression of brc1 rescues the sensitivity to MMS seen in an smc6 mutant but increases mutation frequency	-	BIOGRID
642590	2539020	2541071	275593	277586	SPCC5E4.06	SPBC582.05c	smc6	brc1	rad18	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bass KL (2012)	22366461	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency	overexpression of brc1 rescues the sensitivity to MMS seen in an smc6 mutant but increases mutation frequency	-	BIOGRID
642591	2541071	2540470	277586	276998	SPBC582.05c	SPBC29A10.15	brc1	orc1	-	cdc30|orp1|rid1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bass KL (2012)	22366461	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue	double mutants show increased sensitivity to HU and reduced formation of Rad52 foci compared to a brc1 single mutant	-	BIOGRID
642592	2543577	2541071	279992	277586	SPAC4H3.05	SPBC582.05c	srs2	brc1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bass KL (2012)	22366461	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic recombination:wild type	deletion of brc1 suppresses the hyper-recombination phenotype seen in an srs2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
642593	2541071	2543086	277586	279519	SPBC582.05c	SPAC30D11.10	brc1	rad52	-	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bass KL (2012)	22366461	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	deletion of brc1 suppresses the hyper-recombination phenotype seen in an srs2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
642594	2541071	2543580	277586	279995	SPBC582.05c	SPAC644.14c	brc1	rad51	-	rhp51	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bass KL (2012)	22366461	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:wild type	deletion of rhp51 restores deletion-type events in a brc1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
642597	2541193	2542489	277707	278948	SPBC776.02c	SPAC589.08c	dis2	dam1	bws1|sds1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2012)	22375062	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	tagging dam1 causes growth defects in some mutant backgrounds	-	BIOGRID
642598	2540361	2542489	276890	278948	SPBC2F12.13	SPAC589.08c	klp5	dam1	sot1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2012)	22375062	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	tagging dam1 causes growth defects in some mutant backgrounds	-	BIOGRID
642599	2541957	2541193	278444	277707	SPAC23C11.16	SPBC776.02c	plo1	dis2	-	bws1|sds1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buttrick GJ (2012)	22375062	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
642600	2541957	2542489	278444	278948	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC589.08c	plo1	dam1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Buttrick GJ (2012)	22375062	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
642601	2540498	2542489	277026	278948	SPBC27.02c	SPAC589.08c	ask1	dam1	mug181	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Buttrick GJ (2012)	22375062	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
642602	2539130	2539109	275702	275681	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC74.03c	amk2	ssp2	-	ucp9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Valbuena N (2012)	22375066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
642603	5802929	2539109	858067	275681	SPAC1556.08c	SPCC74.03c	cbs2	ssp2	SPAC1F12.01c	ucp9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Valbuena N (2012)	22375066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
642604	2539109	2539130	275681	275702	SPCC74.03c	SPCC1919.03c	ssp2	amk2	ucp9	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Valbuena N (2012)	22375066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
642605	2539109	5802929	275681	858067	SPCC74.03c	SPAC1556.08c	ssp2	cbs2	ucp9	SPAC1F12.01c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Valbuena N (2012)	22375066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
642606	2539109	2540258	275681	276789	SPCC74.03c	SPBC32C12.02	ssp2	ste11	ucp9	aff1|stex	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Valbuena N (2012)	22375066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:wild type	Overexpression of Ste11 rescues the mating deficiency seen in an ssp2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
642607	2538951	2539109	275525	275681	SPCC297.03	SPCC74.03c	ssp1	ssp2	-	ucp9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Valbuena N (2012)	22375066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:wild type	the ssp2-T189E allele can rescue the sterility of an ssp1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
643043	2541213	2540728	277727	277251	SPBC887.14c	SPBC216.06c	pfh1	swi1	pif1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sabouri N (2012)	22426534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
643044	2538743	2539751	275326	276303	SPCC1906.01	SPBC13G1.02	mpg1	mpg2	-	SPBC13G1.02	Two-hybrid	physical	Munoz-Centeno MC (2012)	22416758	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
643045	2538743	2538743	275326	275326	SPCC1906.01	SPCC1906.01	mpg1	mpg1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Munoz-Centeno MC (2012)	22416758	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
643046	2539751	2539751	276303	276303	SPBC13G1.02	SPBC13G1.02	mpg2	mpg2	SPBC13G1.02	SPBC13G1.02	Two-hybrid	physical	Munoz-Centeno MC (2012)	22416758	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
643048	2538743	2539751	275326	276303	SPCC1906.01	SPBC13G1.02	mpg1	mpg2	-	SPBC13G1.02	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Munoz-Centeno MC (2012)	22416758	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression through the G2/M phase transition|vegetative growth	double mutants show increase cell cycle arrest at G2/M|double mutants show increased sensitivity to thiamine and hygromicine	-	BIOGRID
643049	2540472	2543069	277000	279502	SPBC2G2.12	SPAC3A11.05c	hrs1	kms1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Funaya C (2012)	22425159	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
643050	2540472	2540392	277000	276920	SPBC2G2.12	SPBC365.15	hrs1	alp4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Funaya C (2012)	22425159	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
643051	2540472	2540472	277000	277000	SPBC2G2.12	SPBC2G2.12	hrs1	hrs1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Funaya C (2012)	22425159	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
643052	2540472	2541247	277000	277761	SPBC2G2.12	SPBC947.12	hrs1	kms2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Funaya C (2012)	22425159	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
643054	2540472	2540589	277000	277115	SPBC2G2.12	SPBC20F10.06	hrs1	mad2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Funaya C (2012)	22425159	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	position of spindle pole body|sporulation	, deletion of mad2 abolished the delay to bipolar spindle formation by Hrs1.T16A-FA6 causing aberrant spindle formation and sporulation defects	-	BIOGRID
643055	2541889	2539205	278379	275775	SPAC2F7.03c	SPCC4B3.15	pom1	mid1	-	dmf1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Lee IJ (2012)	22427686	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis:wild type	Mid1 lacking the internal region aa(101-400) suppresses the cytokinesis defects of a pom1 null mutant	-	BIOGRID
643056	2541889	2543168	278379	279599	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC31A2.16	pom1	gef2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Lee IJ (2012)	22427686	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:partial rescue	septum positioning defects in pom1 mutants were partially suppressed by gef2 deletion	-	BIOGRID
643061	2543129	2539205	279561	275775	SPAC4F8.13c	SPCC4B3.15	rng2	mid1	-	dmf1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lee IJ (2012)	22427686	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
643062	2541699	2539205	278195	275775	SPAP8A3.08	SPCC4B3.15	cdc4	mid1	-	dmf1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lee IJ (2012)	22427686	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
643063	2541975	2539205	278460	275775	SPAC20G8.05c	SPCC4B3.15	cdc15	mid1	-	dmf1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lee IJ (2012)	22427686	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
643064	2541590	2539205	278087	275775	SPAC57A10.02	SPCC4B3.15	cdr2	mid1	-	dmf1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lee IJ (2012)	22427686	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
643065	2539513	2539205	276075	275775	SPCC645.05c	SPCC4B3.15	myo2	mid1	rng5	dmf1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lee IJ (2012)	22427686	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
643938	2539215	2540020	275785	276564	SPCC285.16c	SPBC16D10.09	msh6	pcn1	-	pcn	Two-hybrid	physical	Zamir L (2012)	22308326	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
643939	2539627	2540020	276184	276564	SPBC1734.02c	SPBC16D10.09	cdc27	pcn1	SPBC337.18c	pcn	Two-hybrid	physical	Zamir L (2012)	22308326	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
643940	2541213	2540020	277727	276564	SPBC887.14c	SPBC16D10.09	pfh1	pcn1	pif1	pcn	Two-hybrid	physical	Zamir L (2012)	22308326	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
643941	2539087	2540020	275659	276564	SPCC1259.13	SPBC16D10.09	chk1	pcn1	rad27	pcn	Two-hybrid	physical	Zamir L (2012)	22308326	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
643942	2538855	2540020	275436	276564	SPCC1183.06	SPBC16D10.09	ung1	pcn1	-	pcn	Two-hybrid	physical	Zamir L (2012)	22308326	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
643943	2539666	2540020	276221	276564	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC16D10.09	eso1	pcn1	-	pcn	Two-hybrid	physical	Zamir L (2012)	22308326	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
643944	2541849	2540020	278340	276564	SPAC20G8.01	SPBC16D10.09	cdc17	pcn1	SPAC57A10.13c	pcn	Two-hybrid	physical	Zamir L (2012)	22308326	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
657186	2538762	399088	275345	100414	SPCC306.04c	-	set1	hist1h3g	kmt2	Hist1h3f|h3|hist2h3c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Racine A (2012)	22505722	284812	8355	Low Throughput	-	Methylation	-	figure 1. Set1C complex contains eight subunits: Set1, Ash2, Spf1, Swd3, Swd1, Swd2.1, Shg1, and Sdc1.	-	BIOGRID
657187	2539667	399088	276222	100414	SPBC13G1.08c	-	ash2	hist1h3g	-	Hist1h3f|h3|hist2h3c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Racine A (2012)	22505722	284812	8355	Low Throughput	-	Methylation	-	figure 1. Set1C complex contains eight subunits: Set1, Ash2, Spf1, Swd3, Swd1, Swd2.1, Shg1, and Sdc1.	-	BIOGRID
657188	2539023	399088	275596	100414	SPCC594.05c	-	spf1	hist1h3g	spp1	Hist1h3f|h3|hist2h3c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Racine A (2012)	22505722	284812	8355	Low Throughput	-	Methylation	-	figure 1. Set1C complex contains eight subunits: Set1, Ash2, Spf1, Swd3, Swd1, Swd2.1, Shg1, and Sdc1.	-	BIOGRID
657189	2540929	399088	277445	100414	SPBC354.03	-	swd3	hist1h3g	-	Hist1h3f|h3|hist2h3c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Racine A (2012)	22505722	284812	8355	Low Throughput	-	Methylation	-	figure 1. Set1C complex contains eight subunits: Set1, Ash2, Spf1, Swd3, Swd1, Swd2.1, Shg1, and Sdc1.	-	BIOGRID
657190	2541776	399088	278270	100414	SPAC23H3.05c	-	swd1	hist1h3g	-	Hist1h3f|h3|hist2h3c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Racine A (2012)	22505722	284812	8355	Low Throughput	-	Methylation	-	figure 1. Set1C complex contains eight subunits: Set1, Ash2, Spf1, Swd3, Swd1, Swd2.1, Shg1, and Sdc1.	-	BIOGRID
657191	2540788	399088	277307	100414	SPBC18H10.06c	-	swd2	hist1h3g	swd2.1	Hist1h3f|h3|hist2h3c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Racine A (2012)	22505722	284812	8355	Low Throughput	-	Methylation	-	figure 1. Set1C complex contains eight subunits: Set1, Ash2, Spf1, Swd3, Swd1, Swd2.1, Shg1, and Sdc1.	-	BIOGRID
657192	3361506	399088	280582	100414	SPAC17G8.09	-	shg1	hist1h3g	-	Hist1h3f|h3|hist2h3c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Racine A (2012)	22505722	284812	8355	Low Throughput	-	Methylation	-	figure 1. Set1C complex contains eight subunits: Set1, Ash2, Spf1, Swd3, Swd1, Swd2.1, Shg1, and Sdc1.	-	BIOGRID
657193	2539145	399088	275717	100414	SPCC18.11c	-	sdc1	hist1h3g	dpy30	Hist1h3f|h3|hist2h3c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Racine A (2012)	22505722	284812	8355	Low Throughput	-	Methylation	-	figure 1. Set1C complex contains eight subunits: Set1, Ash2, Spf1, Swd3, Swd1, Swd2.1, Shg1, and Sdc1.	-	BIOGRID
657262	2539237	2542175	275807	278650	SPCC24B10.13	SPAC1F3.02c	skb5	mkh1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Luminescence	physical	Stanger K (2012)	22570491	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 5B. interaction between SH3 domain (Skb5) and binding peptide (Mkh1) was measured by total tryptophan fluorescence.	-	BIOGRID
657263	2540020	2540719	276564	277242	SPBC16D10.09	SPBC216.05	pcn1	rad3	pcn	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Salguero I (2012)	22464192	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity[heat sensitivity]	figure 3C.	-	BIOGRID
657264	2542696	2540020	279149	276564	SPAC29B12.03	SPBC16D10.09	spd1	pcn1	-	pcn	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Salguero I (2012)	22464192	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	Synthetic Rescue[Synthetic Rescue]:partial rescue	figure 3C. pcn1 rad3 double mutant exhibits slow/bad growth at restrictive temperature, and spd1 deletion in this background partially rescue the growth.	-	BIOGRID
657265	2542696	2540719	279149	277242	SPAC29B12.03	SPBC216.05	spd1	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Salguero I (2012)	22464192	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	Synthetic Rescue[Synthetic Rescue]:partial rescue	figure 3C. pcn1 rad3 double mutant exhibits slow/bad growth at restrictive temperature, and spd1 deletion in this background partially rescue the growth.	-	BIOGRID
657277	2541957	2540643	278444	277168	SPAC23C11.16	SPBC19G7.06	plo1	mbx1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Szilagyi Z (2012)	22451489	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3A.	-	BIOGRID
657278	2541900	2539703	278390	276256	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC16G5.15c	srb10	fkh2	cdk8|prk1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Szilagyi Z (2012)	22451489	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3A.	-	BIOGRID
657279	2541900	2539703	278390	276256	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC16G5.15c	srb10	fkh2	cdk8|prk1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Szilagyi Z (2012)	22451489	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	figure 4D-F.	-	BIOGRID
657668	2542052	2540072	278531	276610	SPAC823.15	SPBC16H5.07c	ppa1	ppa2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Goyal A (2012)	22267499	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
657669	2542052	2542349	278531	278814	SPAC823.15	SPAC1782.05	ppa1	ypa2	-	SPAC1782.05|pta2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Goyal A (2012)	22267499	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
657670	2540072	2542349	276610	278814	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC1782.05	ppa2	ypa2	-	SPAC1782.05|pta2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Goyal A (2012)	22267499	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
657672	2540072	2543619	276610	280033	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC4F10.04	ppa2	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Goyal A (2012)	22267499	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
657673	2543619	2542349	280033	278814	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC1782.05	ypa1	ypa2	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Goyal A (2012)	22267499	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
661743	2543539	2541957	279956	278444	SPAC926.04c	SPAC23C11.16	hsp90	plo1	git10|swo1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Santino A (2012)	22543982	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
661744	2543539	2539869	279956	276415	SPAC926.04c	SPBC11B10.09	hsp90	cdc2	git10|swo1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Santino A (2012)	22543982	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology	double mutants show synthetic actin defects	-	BIOGRID
661745	2543539	2541599	279956	278096	SPAC926.04c	SPAC24B11.11c	hsp90	sid2	git10|swo1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Santino A (2012)	22543982	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
661746	2543539	2540660	279956	277185	SPAC926.04c	SPBC21.06c	hsp90	cdc7	git10|swo1	its10|pld1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Santino A (2012)	22543982	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
661747	2543539	2539869	279956	276415	SPAC926.04c	SPBC11B10.09	hsp90	cdc2	git10|swo1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Santino A (2012)	22543982	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
661748	2543539	2541957	279956	278444	SPAC926.04c	SPAC23C11.16	hsp90	plo1	git10|swo1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Santino A (2012)	22543982	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
661974	2542252	2541806	278722	278297	SPAC17A2.13c	SPAC4G8.13c	rad25	prz1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Koike A (2012)	22496451	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability[viability]	figure 3. overexpression of Rad25, Msn5, Pac1, Pka1, Ape2, or Tfs1 suppressed the slow growth phenotype caused by over-expressing Prz1.|figure 5. overexpression of Rad25 or Rad 24 partially suppressed the slow growth phenotype caused by over-expressing Rst2.	-	BIOGRID
661975	2542592	2541806	279047	278297	SPAC328.01c	SPAC4G8.13c	msn5	prz1	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Koike A (2012)	22496451	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability[viability]	figure 3. overexpression of Rad25, Msn5, Pac1, Pka1, Ape2, or Tfs1 suppressed the slow growth phenotype caused by over-expressing Prz1.|figure 5. overexpression of Rad25 or Rad 24 partially suppressed the slow growth phenotype caused by over-expressing Rst2.	-	BIOGRID
661976	2540084	2541806	276622	278297	SPBC119.11c	SPAC4G8.13c	pac1	prz1	hcs|rnt1|snm1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Koike A (2012)	22496451	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability[viability]	figure 3. overexpression of Rad25, Msn5, Pac1, Pka1, Ape2, or Tfs1 suppressed the slow growth phenotype caused by over-expressing Prz1.|figure 5. overexpression of Rad25 or Rad 24 partially suppressed the slow growth phenotype caused by over-expressing Rst2.	-	BIOGRID
661977	2539781	2541806	276331	278297	SPBC106.10	SPAC4G8.13c	pka1	prz1	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Koike A (2012)	22496451	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability[viability]	figure 3. overexpression of Rad25, Msn5, Pac1, Pka1, Ape2, or Tfs1 suppressed the slow growth phenotype caused by over-expressing Prz1.|figure 5. overexpression of Rad25 or Rad 24 partially suppressed the slow growth phenotype caused by over-expressing Rst2.	-	BIOGRID
661978	2540648	2541806	277173	278297	SPBC1921.05	SPAC4G8.13c	ape2	prz1	ape1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Koike A (2012)	22496451	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability[viability]	figure 3. overexpression of Rad25, Msn5, Pac1, Pka1, Ape2, or Tfs1 suppressed the slow growth phenotype caused by over-expressing Prz1.|figure 5. overexpression of Rad25 or Rad 24 partially suppressed the slow growth phenotype caused by over-expressing Rst2.	-	BIOGRID
661979	2541941	2541806	278428	278297	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC4G8.13c	tfs1	prz1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Koike A (2012)	22496451	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability[viability]	figure 3. overexpression of Rad25, Msn5, Pac1, Pka1, Ape2, or Tfs1 suppressed the slow growth phenotype caused by over-expressing Prz1.|figure 5. overexpression of Rad25 or Rad 24 partially suppressed the slow growth phenotype caused by over-expressing Rst2.	-	BIOGRID
661980	2542029	2543031	278511	279467	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC6F12.02	rad24	rst2	anr5|sam4	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Koike A (2012)	22496451	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability[viability]	figure 5. overexpression of Rad25 or Rad 24 partially suppressed the slow growth phenotype caused by over-expressing Rst2.	-	BIOGRID
661981	2542252	2543031	278722	279467	SPAC17A2.13c	SPAC6F12.02	rad25	rst2	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Koike A (2012)	22496451	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability[viability]	figure 5. overexpression of Rad25 or Rad 24 partially suppressed the slow growth phenotype caused by over-expressing Rst2.	-	BIOGRID
661982	2542029	2541806	278511	278297	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC4G8.13c	rad24	prz1	anr5|sam4	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Koike A (2012)	22496451	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability[viability]	figure 6A.	-	BIOGRID
661983	2542029	2541806	278511	278297	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC4G8.13c	rad24	prz1	anr5|sam4	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Koike A (2012)	22496451	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 6B.|figure 7C. mapping of the regions required for Rad24 association.|figure 8C.	-	BIOGRID
661984	2542252	2541806	278722	278297	SPAC17A2.13c	SPAC4G8.13c	rad25	prz1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Koike A (2012)	22496451	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 6B.|figure 6C. the interaction was enhanced by the presence of FK506.|figure 8C.	-	BIOGRID
661985	2542252	2542029	278722	278511	SPAC17A2.13c	SPAC8E11.02c	rad25	rad24	-	anr5|sam4	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Koike A (2012)	22496451	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability[viability]	figure 7B. multicopy of Rad25 rescues growth of rad24 deletion cells in presence of FK506.	-	BIOGRID
661986	18747	2541806	202192	278297	-	SPAC4G8.13c	Prkaca	prz1	PKCD|Pkaca	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Koike A (2012)	22496451	10090	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	figure 8F.	-	BIOGRID
661988	2540720	2542404	277243	278868	SPBC216.07c	SPAC57A7.11	tor2	mip1	SPBC646.01c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ikai N (2011)	22645648	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 1b.	-	BIOGRID
661989	2540720	2538993	277243	275567	SPBC216.07c	SPCC162.12	tor2	tco89	SPBC646.01c	SPCC1753.06c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ikai N (2011)	22645648	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 1b.	-	BIOGRID
661990	2540473	2539845	277001	276393	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC12C2.02c	tor1	ste20	-	ste16	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ikai N (2011)	22645648	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 1b.	-	BIOGRID
661991	2540473	2542972	277001	279411	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAPYUG7.02c	tor1	sin1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ikai N (2011)	22645648	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 1b.	-	BIOGRID
661992	2540473	2538963	277001	275537	SPBC30D10.10c	SPCC777.08c	tor1	bit61	-	SPCC777.08	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ikai N (2011)	22645648	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 1b.	-	BIOGRID
661993	2541195	2540720	277709	277243	SPBC839.17c	SPBC216.07c	fkh1	tor2	SPBC24E9.17c	SPBC646.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ikai N (2011)	22645648	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	killer toxin resistance[killer toxin resistance]	figure 1e.	-	BIOGRID
661994	2540720	6198	277243	112112	SPBC216.07c	-	tor2	RPS6KB1	SPBC646.01c	PS6K|S6K|S6K-beta-1|S6K1|STK14A|p70 S6KA|p70(S6K)-alpha|p70-S6K|p70-alpha	Biochemical Activity	physical	Ikai N (2011)	22645648	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	figure 2.	-	BIOGRID
661995	2541195	2539442	277709	276005	SPBC839.17c	SPCC5E4.04	fkh1	cut1	SPBC24E9.17c	ptr4	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ikai N (2011)	22645648	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity[heat sensitivity]	figure 6b. combined with rapamycin.	-	BIOGRID
661996	2541195	2539641	277709	276196	SPBC839.17c	SPBC14C8.01c	fkh1	cut2	SPBC24E9.17c	SPBC1815.02c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ikai N (2011)	22645648	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability[viability]	figure 6c.	-	BIOGRID
661997	2540720	2539442	277243	276005	SPBC216.07c	SPCC5E4.04	tor2	cut1	SPBC646.01c	ptr4	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ikai N (2011)	22645648	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability[viability]	figure 1d. rescue normal growth only at 30 degree.	-	BIOGRID
661998	2540720	2539641	277243	276196	SPBC216.07c	SPBC14C8.01c	tor2	cut2	SPBC646.01c	SPBC1815.02c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ikai N (2011)	22645648	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability[viability]	figure 6d.	-	BIOGRID
661999	2540473	2539442	277001	276005	SPBC30D10.10c	SPCC5E4.04	tor1	cut1	-	ptr4	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ikai N (2011)	22645648	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	figure 6e.	-	BIOGRID
662000	2540473	2539641	277001	276196	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC14C8.01c	tor1	cut2	-	SPBC1815.02c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ikai N (2011)	22645648	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity[heat sensitivity]	figure 6e.	-	BIOGRID
662058	2541120	2540345	277635	276874	SPBC649.03	SPBC19C7.09c	rhp14	uve1	-	uvde	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Boe CA (2012)	22665798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression[cell cycle progression]	figure 3. No G1 delay upon of UV treatment in double mutant.	-	BIOGRID
662059	2538760	2540345	275343	276874	SPCC970.01	SPBC19C7.09c	rad16	uve1	rad10|rad20|swi9	uvde	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Boe CA (2012)	22665798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression[cell cycle progression]	figure 4. strongly reduced G1 delay upon of UV treatment in triple mutant.	-	BIOGRID
662060	2541051	2540345	277566	276874	SPBC3E7.08c	SPBC19C7.09c	rad13	uve1	-	uvde	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Boe CA (2012)	22665798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression[cell cycle progression]	figure 4. strongly reduced G1 delay upon of UV treatment in triple mutant.	-	BIOGRID
662061	2538760	2540345	275343	276874	SPCC970.01	SPBC19C7.09c	rad16	uve1	rad10|rad20|swi9	uvde	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Boe CA (2012)	22665798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression[cell cycle progression]	figure S3,S4. prolonged G1 delay upon of UV treatment in double mutant.	-	BIOGRID
662062	2541051	2540345	277566	276874	SPBC3E7.08c	SPBC19C7.09c	rad13	uve1	-	uvde	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Boe CA (2012)	22665798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression[cell cycle progression]	figure S3,S4. prolonged G1 delay upon of UV treatment in double mutant.	-	BIOGRID
662146	2539644	2540578	276199	277104	SPBC16E9.01c	SPBC26H8.06	php4	grx4	SPBP16F5.09c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vachon P (2012)	22523368	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
662151	2540060	2539155	276598	275727	SPBC106.01	SPCC1020.02	mph1	spc7	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Yamagishi Y (2012)	22660415	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
662154	2538736	2541856	275320	278347	SPCC1322.12c	SPAC23H3.08c	bub1	bub3	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Yamagishi Y (2012)	22660415	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
662155	2539155	2538736	275727	275320	SPCC1020.02	SPCC1322.12c	spc7	bub1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Yamagishi Y (2012)	22660415	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
662156	2539155	2541856	275727	278347	SPCC1020.02	SPAC23H3.08c	spc7	bub3	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Yamagishi Y (2012)	22660415	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
662157	2540060	2539155	276598	275727	SPBC106.01	SPCC1020.02	mph1	spc7	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Yamagishi Y (2012)	22660415	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	mutation of spc7 partially rescues sensitivity to TBZ (CID 5430 CHEBI 45979) in an mph1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
662158	2539205	2539487	275775	276050	SPCC4B3.15	SPCC895.05	mid1	for3	dmf1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Mishra M (2012)	22505610	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis|cytoskeleton morphology	double mutants show increased defects in actomyosin ring anchoring	-	BIOGRID
662159	2539205	2539047	275775	275620	SPCC4B3.15	SPCC1223.06	mid1	tea1	dmf1	alp8	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Mishra M (2012)	22505610	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis|cytoskeleton morphology	double mutants show increased defects in actomyosin ring anchoring	-	BIOGRID
662160	2541599	2539149	278096	275721	SPAC24B11.11c	SPCC1739.11c	sid2	cdc11	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Feoktistova A (2012)	22419817	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
662161	2541599	2540845	278096	277362	SPAC24B11.11c	SPBC428.13c	sid2	mob1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Feoktistova A (2012)	22419817	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
662162	2541599	2540650	278096	277175	SPAC24B11.11c	SPBC244.01c	sid2	sid4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Feoktistova A (2012)	22419817	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
662163	2541599	2539149	278096	275721	SPAC24B11.11c	SPCC1739.11c	sid2	cdc11	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Feoktistova A (2012)	22419817	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
662164	2540660	2539149	277185	275721	SPBC21.06c	SPCC1739.11c	cdc7	cdc11	its10|pld1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Feoktistova A (2012)	22419817	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	cdc11-S5A and cdc11-S5A-GFP were synthetically lethal with cdc7-24 and synthetically sick with cdc7-A20	-	BIOGRID
662165	2540660	2539149	277185	275721	SPBC21.06c	SPCC1739.11c	cdc7	cdc11	its10|pld1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Feoktistova A (2012)	22419817	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
662166	2540660	2539149	277185	275721	SPBC21.06c	SPCC1739.11c	cdc7	cdc11	its10|pld1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Feoktistova A (2012)	22419817	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
662167	2539248	2538690	275818	275275	SPCC1739.03	SPCC1393.05	hrr1	ers1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Hayashi A (2012)	22474355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability[viability]	figure2. the silencing defect of ers1-C62 was suppressed by overexpression of Hrr or Clr4.	-	BIOGRID
662168	2540825	2538690	277343	275275	SPBC428.08c	SPCC1393.05	clr4	ers1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Hayashi A (2012)	22474355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability[viability]	figure2. the silencing defect of ers1-C62 was suppressed by overexpression of Hrr or Clr4.	-	BIOGRID
662169	2538690	2539248	275275	275818	SPCC1393.05	SPCC1739.03	ers1	hrr1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Hayashi A (2012)	22474355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3A.|figure S7.	-	BIOGRID
662170	2539248	2538690	275818	275275	SPCC1739.03	SPCC1393.05	hrr1	ers1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Hayashi A (2012)	22474355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3A.|figure S7.	-	BIOGRID
662171	2538690	2539248	275275	275818	SPCC1393.05	SPCC1739.03	ers1	hrr1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hayashi A (2012)	22474355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3B.	-	BIOGRID
662172	2539248	2538690	275818	275275	SPCC1739.03	SPCC1393.05	hrr1	ers1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hayashi A (2012)	22474355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3D. association was reduced in C62 mutant.	-	BIOGRID
662174	2541633	2538690	278129	275275	SPAC664.01c	SPCC1393.05	swi6	ers1	SPAC824.10c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hayashi A (2012)	22474355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 4E. association was reduced in C62 mutant.	-	BIOGRID
662175	2541633	2538690	278129	275275	SPAC664.01c	SPCC1393.05	swi6	ers1	SPAC824.10c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Hayashi A (2012)	22474355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 4D.	-	BIOGRID
662176	2540735	2539248	277258	275818	SPBC83.03c	SPCC1739.03	tas3	hrr1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hayashi A (2012)	22474355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 6E.	-	BIOGRID
662177	2538690	2541633	275275	278129	SPCC1393.05	SPAC664.01c	ers1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Two-hybrid	physical	Hayashi A (2012)	22474355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure S7.	-	BIOGRID
662178	2539423	2540735	275988	277258	SPCC663.12	SPBC83.03c	cid12	tas3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Hayashi A (2012)	22474355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure S7.	-	BIOGRID
662179	2539423	2542198	275988	278673	SPCC663.12	SPAC6F12.09	cid12	rdp1	-	rdr1	Two-hybrid	physical	Hayashi A (2012)	22474355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure S7.	-	BIOGRID
662180	2539423	2539248	275988	275818	SPCC663.12	SPCC1739.03	cid12	hrr1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Hayashi A (2012)	22474355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure S7.	-	BIOGRID
662181	2539248	2539423	275818	275988	SPCC1739.03	SPCC663.12	hrr1	cid12	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Hayashi A (2012)	22474355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure S7.	-	BIOGRID
662182	2542198	2540735	278673	277258	SPAC6F12.09	SPBC83.03c	rdp1	tas3	rdr1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Hayashi A (2012)	22474355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure S7.	-	BIOGRID
662183	2542198	2539423	278673	275988	SPAC6F12.09	SPCC663.12	rdp1	cid12	rdr1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Hayashi A (2012)	22474355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure S7.	-	BIOGRID
662184	2542198	2539248	278673	275818	SPAC6F12.09	SPCC1739.03	rdp1	hrr1	rdr1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Hayashi A (2012)	22474355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure S7.	-	BIOGRID
662185	2540735	2542239	277258	278711	SPBC83.03c	SPAC18G6.02c	tas3	chp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Hayashi A (2012)	22474355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure S7.	-	BIOGRID
662186	2542239	2540735	278711	277258	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC83.03c	chp1	tas3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Hayashi A (2012)	22474355	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure S7.	-	BIOGRID
662198	2539963	2543441	276507	279861	SPBC17F3.02	SPAC821.12	nak1	orb6	mor4|orb3	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Liu G (2012)	22629372	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:partial rescue	Orb6 overexpression partially rescues the nak1 ts polarity defect	-	BIOGRID
662199	2542123	2539864	278599	276411	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC16A3.15c	mal3	nda2	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Maurer SP (2012)	22500803	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	The Mal3 CH Domain Binds to GTPgS Microtubules between Protofilaments except at the Microtubule Seam	-	BIOGRID
662200	2542123	2540582	278599	277108	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC26H8.07c	mal3	nda3	-	alp12|ben1	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Maurer SP (2012)	22500803	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	The Mal3 CH Domain Binds to GTPgS Microtubules between Protofilaments except at the Microtubule Seam	-	BIOGRID
662201	2543441	2539963	279861	276507	SPAC821.12	SPBC17F3.02	orb6	nak1	-	mor4|orb3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Liu G (2012)	22629372	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
662202	2543441	2539963	279861	276507	SPAC821.12	SPBC17F3.02	orb6	nak1	-	mor4|orb3	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Liu G (2012)	22629372	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
662203	2543441	2543441	279861	279861	SPAC821.12	SPAC821.12	orb6	orb6	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Liu G (2012)	22629372	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	Orb6 autophosphorylates in vitro	-	BIOGRID
662204	2541792	2543643	278283	280057	SPAC22E12.19	SPAC3G9.07c	snt1	hos2	SPAC2E12.01	hda1|phd1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Grewal C (2012)	22559741	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 4B.	-	BIOGRID
662206	2541899	2543643	278389	280057	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC3G9.07c	set3	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Grewal C (2012)	22559741	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 4B.	-	BIOGRID
662207	2538701	2543643	275286	280057	SPCC1235.09	SPAC3G9.07c	hif2	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Grewal C (2012)	22559741	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
662208	2541652	2539920	278148	276464	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC119.08	sty1	pmk1	phh1|spc1	spm1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Zhou X (2012)	22661707	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	osmotic stress resistance|oxidative stress resistance|protein activity	double mutants show increased sensitivity to oxidative and osmotic stress and increased defects in atf1 activation	-	BIOGRID
662209	2542988	2541209	279426	277723	SPAC1006.09	SPBC887.10	win1	mcs4	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Zhou X (2012)	22661707	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	osmotic stress resistance|oxidative stress resistance|protein activity	double mutants show increased sensitivity to oxidative and osmotic stress and increased defects in atf1 activation	-	BIOGRID
662210	2542988	2542873	279426	279318	SPAC1006.09	SPAC9G1.02	win1	wis4	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	wak1|wik1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Zhou X (2012)	22661707	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	osmotic stress resistance|oxidative stress resistance|protein activity	double mutants show increased sensitivity to oxidative and osmotic stress and increased defects in atf1 activation	-	BIOGRID
662211	2541141	2541455	277656	277958	SPBC649.05	SPAC6G9.06c	cut12	pcp1	stf1	-	Co-localization	physical	Ohta M (2012)	22438582	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
662212	2541455	2541141	277958	277656	SPAC6G9.06c	SPBC649.05	pcp1	cut12	-	stf1	Co-localization	physical	Ohta M (2012)	22438582	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
662213	2541957	2541455	278444	277958	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC6G9.06c	plo1	pcp1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Ohta M (2012)	22438582	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
662214	2541957	2541141	278444	277656	SPAC23C11.16	SPBC649.05	plo1	cut12	-	stf1	Co-localization	physical	Ohta M (2012)	22438582	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
662215	2541135	2541529	277650	278029	SPBC839.03c	SPAC1687.13c	SPBC839.03c	csn5	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Girdwood D (2012)	22673520	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification:partial rescue	Deletion of csn5 in the dcn1 null strain shifted the dynamic of Pcu1p neddylation to levels again detectable by Western blot analysis	-	BIOGRID
662216	2542099	2541135	278575	277650	SPAC24H6.12c	SPBC839.03c	uba3	SPBC839.03c	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Girdwood D (2012)	22673520	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	double mutants show reduced viability at restrictive temperatures	-	BIOGRID
662217	2542099	2541529	278575	278029	SPAC24H6.12c	SPAC1687.13c	uba3	csn5	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Girdwood D (2012)	22673520	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|viability:wild type	deletion of csn5 improves viability in a uba3 mutant	-	BIOGRID
662285	2540212	2540212	276745	276745	SPBC9B6.05c	SPBC9B6.05c	lsm3	lsm3	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Wu D (2012)	22615807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 1. ring structure of heptamer.	-	BIOGRID
662286	2540475	2540475	277003	277003	SPBC30D10.06	SPBC30D10.06	lsm4	lsm4	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Wu D (2012)	22615807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 1. ring structure of trimer.	-	BIOGRID
662287	2540723	2541997	277246	278481	SPBC20F10.09	SPAC2F3.17c	lsm5	lsm6	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Wu D (2012)	22615807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 1. ring structure of hexamer.	-	BIOGRID
662288	2540723	2538964	277246	275538	SPBC20F10.09	SPCC285.12	lsm5	lsm7	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Wu D (2012)	22615807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 1. ring structure of hexamer.	-	BIOGRID
662289	2542806	2540057	279254	276595	SPAC1610.01	SPBC16H5.10c	saf5	prp43	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity[heat sensitivity]|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
662582	2542286	2539335	278754	275901	SPAC1786.01c	SPCC1450.16c	ptl2	ptl1	SPAC1786.01c|SPAC31G5.20c	SPCC1450.16c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yazawa H (2012)	22592553	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chemical compound accumulation|resistance to chemicals	double mutants show increased triglyceride and fatty acid content and increased sensitivity to cerulenin	-	BIOGRID
662583	2542286	2542205	278754	278680	SPAC1786.01c	SPAC1A6.05c	ptl2	ptl3	SPAC1786.01c|SPAC31G5.20c	SPAC1A6.05c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yazawa H (2012)	22592553	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chemical compound accumulation|resistance to chemicals	double mutants show increased triglyceride and fatty acid content and increased sensitivity to cerulenin	-	BIOGRID
662592	2539838	2541324	276387	277836	SPBC1347.10	SPBP23A10.09	cdc23	psf1	mcm10	-	Co-localization	physical	Kanke M (2012)	22433840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 2. Mcm10 recruitment to replication origins is dependent on the CMG components.	-	BIOGRID
662593	2539838	2542266	276387	278735	SPBC1347.10	SPAC17D4.02	cdc23	cdc45	mcm10	goa1|sna41	Co-localization	physical	Kanke M (2012)	22433840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 2. Mcm10 recruitment to replication origins is dependent on the CMG components.	-	BIOGRID
662594	2541194	2540784	277708	277303	SPBC725.13c	SPBC211.04c	psf2	mcm6	bsh3|dre13	mis5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kanke M (2012)	22433840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure3. complex formation is Mcm10-independent.	-	BIOGRID
662595	2541194	2539164	277708	275735	SPBC725.13c	SPCC16A11.17	psf2	mcm4	bsh3|dre13	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kanke M (2012)	22433840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure3. complex formation is Mcm10-independent.	-	BIOGRID
662596	2541194	2542266	277708	278735	SPBC725.13c	SPAC17D4.02	psf2	cdc45	bsh3|dre13	goa1|sna41	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kanke M (2012)	22433840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure3. complex formation is Mcm10-independent.	-	BIOGRID
662597	2539838	2543629	276387	280043	SPBC1347.10	SPAC3H5.06c	cdc23	pol1	mcm10	polA|swi7	Co-localization	physical	Kanke M (2012)	22433840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 5. ChIP data: replisome assembly is Mcm10-dependent.	-	BIOGRID
662598	2539838	2540255	276387	276786	SPBC1347.10	SPBC336.04	cdc23	cdc6	mcm10	mis10|pol3|pold	Co-localization	physical	Kanke M (2012)	22433840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 5. ChIP data: replisome assembly is Mcm10-dependent.	-	BIOGRID
662599	2542628	2543281	279082	279708	SPAC24H6.06	SPAC23C4.18c	sld3	rad4	mug175	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Co-localization	physical	Kanke M (2012)	22433840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 6. ChIP data.	-	BIOGRID
662600	2542628	2543310	279082	279734	SPAC24H6.06	SPAC6B12.11	sld3	drc1	mug175	sld2	Co-localization	physical	Kanke M (2012)	22433840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 6. ChIP data.	-	BIOGRID
662601	2539838	2540620	276387	277146	SPBC1347.10	SPBC4.04c	cdc23	mcm2	mcm10	cdc19|nda1	Two-hybrid	physical	Kanke M (2012)	22433840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 7B. A conserved zinc-finger motif on Mcm10 functions in self-interaction and is essential for origin DNA unwinding.	-	BIOGRID
662602	2539838	2539164	276387	275735	SPBC1347.10	SPCC16A11.17	cdc23	mcm4	mcm10	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Two-hybrid	physical	Kanke M (2012)	22433840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 7B. A conserved zinc-finger motif on Mcm10 functions in self-interaction and is essential for origin DNA unwinding.	-	BIOGRID
662603	2539838	2540784	276387	277303	SPBC1347.10	SPBC211.04c	cdc23	mcm6	mcm10	mis5	Two-hybrid	physical	Kanke M (2012)	22433840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 7B. A conserved zinc-finger motif on Mcm10 functions in self-interaction and is essential for origin DNA unwinding.	-	BIOGRID
662604	2539838	2541368	276387	277879	SPBC1347.10	SPBP4H10.21c	cdc23	sld5	mcm10	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Kanke M (2012)	22433840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 7B. A conserved zinc-finger motif on Mcm10 functions in self-interaction and is essential for origin DNA unwinding.	-	BIOGRID
662605	2539838	2541194	276387	277708	SPBC1347.10	SPBC725.13c	cdc23	psf2	mcm10	bsh3|dre13	Two-hybrid	physical	Kanke M (2012)	22433840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 7B. A conserved zinc-finger motif on Mcm10 functions in self-interaction and is essential for origin DNA unwinding.	-	BIOGRID
662606	2539838	2543281	276387	279708	SPBC1347.10	SPAC23C4.18c	cdc23	rad4	mcm10	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Two-hybrid	physical	Kanke M (2012)	22433840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 7B. A conserved zinc-finger motif on Mcm10 functions in self-interaction and is essential for origin DNA unwinding.	-	BIOGRID
662607	2539838	2539838	276387	276387	SPBC1347.10	SPBC1347.10	cdc23	cdc23	mcm10	mcm10	Two-hybrid	physical	Kanke M (2012)	22433840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 7B. A conserved zinc-finger motif on Mcm10 functions in self-interaction and is essential for origin DNA unwinding.	-	BIOGRID
662608	2539838	2541324	276387	277836	SPBC1347.10	SPBP23A10.09	cdc23	psf1	mcm10	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Kanke M (2012)	22433840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 7B. A conserved zinc-finger motif on Mcm10 functions in self-interaction and is essential for origin DNA unwinding.	-	BIOGRID
662609	2539838	2541474	276387	277976	SPBC1347.10	SPAC227.16c	cdc23	psf3	mcm10	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Kanke M (2012)	22433840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 7B. A conserved zinc-finger motif on Mcm10 functions in self-interaction and is essential for origin DNA unwinding.	-	BIOGRID
662610	2539838	2540627	276387	277153	SPBC1347.10	SPBC25H2.13c	cdc23	cdc20	mcm10	pol2	Two-hybrid	physical	Kanke M (2012)	22433840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 7B. A conserved zinc-finger motif on Mcm10 functions in self-interaction and is essential for origin DNA unwinding.	-	BIOGRID
662611	2539838	2543310	276387	279734	SPBC1347.10	SPAC6B12.11	cdc23	drc1	mcm10	sld2	Two-hybrid	physical	Kanke M (2012)	22433840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 7B. A conserved zinc-finger motif on Mcm10 functions in self-interaction and is essential for origin DNA unwinding.	-	BIOGRID
662612	2539838	2541347	276387	277858	SPBC1347.10	SPBP8B7.14c	cdc23	dpb2	mcm10	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Kanke M (2012)	22433840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 7B. A conserved zinc-finger motif on Mcm10 functions in self-interaction and is essential for origin DNA unwinding.	-	BIOGRID
662621	2542239	5802740	278711	857878	SPAC18G6.02c	SPNCRNA.103	chp1	sme2	-	SPNCRNA.1341	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Hiriart E (2012)	22522705	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation efficiency[sporulation efficiency]	figure 4D.	-	BIOGRID
662622	2538930	5802740	275506	857878	SPCC188.13c	SPNCRNA.103	dcr1	sme2	SPCC584.10c	SPNCRNA.1341	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Hiriart E (2012)	22522705	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation efficiency[sporulation efficiency]	figure 4D.	-	BIOGRID
662684	2540027	851415	276571	31921	SPBC1734.14c	YDL140C	suc1	RPO21	p13	RPB1|RPB220|SUA8|DNA-directed RNA polymerase II core subunit RPO21|B220|L000001744	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chymkowitch P (2012)	22689984	284812	559292	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
662685	2540027	852457	276571	32859	SPBC1734.14c	YBR160W	suc1	CDC28	p13	CDK1|HSL5|SRM5|cyclin-dependent serine/threonine-protein kinase CDC28|L000000267	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chymkowitch P (2012)	22689984	284812	559292	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
664494	2539497	2543044	276060	279479	SPCC895.07	SPAC3C7.12	alp14	tip1	mtc1	noc1	Co-localization	physical	Al-Bassam J (2012)	22696680	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 1B.Apl14 co-localizes with +TIP proteins.	-	BIOGRID
664495	2539497	2542123	276060	278599	SPCC895.07	SPAC18G6.15	alp14	mal3	mtc1	-	Co-localization	physical	Al-Bassam J (2012)	22696680	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 1B.Apl14 co-localizes with +TIP proteins.	-	BIOGRID
664499	2539497	2539864	276060	276411	SPCC895.07	SPBC16A3.15c	alp14	nda2	mtc1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Al-Bassam J (2012)	22696680	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	No Modification	-	figure 3. microtubule polymerase.|figure 4. Alp14-GFP tracks growing MT plus ends in vitro.	-	BIOGRID
664500	2539497	2540582	276060	277108	SPCC895.07	SPBC26H8.07c	alp14	nda3	mtc1	alp12|ben1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Al-Bassam J (2012)	22696680	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	No Modification	-	figure 3. microtubule polymerase.|figure 4. Alp14-GFP tracks growing MT plus ends in vitro.	-	BIOGRID
664501	2539497	2539864	276060	276411	SPCC895.07	SPBC16A3.15c	alp14	nda2	mtc1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Al-Bassam J (2012)	22696680	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 5. TOG domain mutant on Alp14 abolishes its ability for tubulin binding.	-	BIOGRID
664502	2539497	2540582	276060	277108	SPCC895.07	SPBC26H8.07c	alp14	nda3	mtc1	alp12|ben1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Al-Bassam J (2012)	22696680	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 5. TOG domain mutant on Alp14 abolishes its ability for tubulin binding.	-	BIOGRID
664504	2539847	2541124	276395	277639	SPBC530.14c	SPBC646.02	dsk1	cwf11	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Tang Z (2012)	22683458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	table 2. one-setp purification of Dsk1-TAP.	-	BIOGRID
664505	2539847	2539941	276395	276485	SPBC530.14c	SPBC13E7.01	dsk1	cwf22	-	SPBC15D4.16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Tang Z (2012)	22683458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	table 2. one-setp purification of Dsk1-TAP.	-	BIOGRID
664506	2539847	2541519	276395	278020	SPBC530.14c	SPAC227.07c	dsk1	pab1	-	ret1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Tang Z (2012)	22683458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	table 2. one-setp purification of Dsk1-TAP.	-	BIOGRID
664507	2539847	2538689	276395	275274	SPBC530.14c	SPCC1795.11	dsk1	sum3	-	ded1|moc2|slh3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Tang Z (2012)	22683458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	table 2. one-setp purification of Dsk1-TAP.	-	BIOGRID
664508	2539847	2542545	276395	279002	SPBC530.14c	SPAC19G12.07c	dsk1	rsd1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Tang Z (2012)	22683458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	table 2. one-setp purification of Dsk1-TAP.	-	BIOGRID
664509	2539847	2539645	276395	276200	SPBC530.14c	SPBC146.07	dsk1	prp2	-	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Tang Z (2012)	22683458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	table 2. one-setp purification of Dsk1-TAP.	-	BIOGRID
664510	2539847	2542256	276395	278726	SPBC530.14c	SPAC29A4.08c	dsk1	prp19	-	cwf8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Tang Z (2012)	22683458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	table 2. one-setp purification of Dsk1-TAP.	-	BIOGRID
664511	2539847	2542772	276395	279221	SPBC530.14c	SPAC16.02c	dsk1	srp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Tang Z (2012)	22683458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	table 2. one-setp purification of Dsk1-TAP.	-	BIOGRID
664512	2539847	2539818	276395	276368	SPBC530.14c	SPBC11C11.08	dsk1	srp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Tang Z (2012)	22683458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	table 2. one-setp purification of Dsk1-TAP.	-	BIOGRID
664513	2539847	2541972	276395	278457	SPBC530.14c	SPAC23C11.11	dsk1	cka1	-	orb5	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Tang Z (2012)	22683458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	table 2. one-setp purification of Dsk1-TAP.	-	BIOGRID
664514	2539847	2539847	276395	276395	SPBC530.14c	SPBC530.14c	dsk1	dsk1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Tang Z (2012)	22683458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	table 2. one-setp purification of Dsk1-TAP.	-	BIOGRID
664515	2539847	2542545	276395	279002	SPBC530.14c	SPAC19G12.07c	dsk1	rsd1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Tang Z (2012)	22683458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	figure 3A.	-	BIOGRID
664516	2539847	2539568	276395	276128	SPBC530.14c	SPCC663.05c	dsk1	cia1	-	asf1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Tang Z (2012)	22683458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	figure 3A.	-	BIOGRID
664517	2539847	2539645	276395	276200	SPBC530.14c	SPBC146.07	dsk1	prp2	-	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Tang Z (2012)	22683458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	figure 3A.	-	BIOGRID
664518	2539869	281099	276415	158462	SPBC11B10.09	BOS_6716	cdc2	CSN2	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Tang Z (2012)	22683458	284812	9913	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	figure 3B.	-	BIOGRID
664519	2539869	617975	276415	545568	SPBC11B10.09	BOS_6113	cdc2	H1F0	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Tang Z (2012)	22683458	284812	9913	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	figure 3B.	-	BIOGRID
664520	2539847	2541124	276395	277639	SPBC530.14c	SPBC646.02	dsk1	cwf11	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tang Z (2012)	22683458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 4.	-	BIOGRID
664521	2539847	3361532	276395	280608	SPBC530.14c	SPAC1D4.11c	dsk1	lkh1	-	kic1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tang Z (2012)	22683458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	figure 7A.	-	BIOGRID
664522	2542480	9407016	278940	1028379	SPAC2C4.03c	SPNCRNA.214	smd2	ter1	cwf9	SPNG585	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Tang W (2012)	22446625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 1C.	-	BIOGRID
664523	2539607	9407016	276165	1028379	SPBC11G11.06c	SPNCRNA.214	sme1	ter1	-	SPNG585	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Tang W (2012)	22446625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 1C.|figure 2. Sm proteins associate with TER1 precursor and promote spliceosomal cleavage.	-	BIOGRID
664524	2542684	9407016	279137	1028379	SPAC26A3.08	SPNCRNA.214	smb1	ter1	smb	SPNG585	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Tang W (2012)	22446625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 1C.|figure 2. Sm proteins associate with TER1 precursor and promote spliceosomal cleavage.	-	BIOGRID
664525	2540212	9407016	276745	1028379	SPBC9B6.05c	SPNCRNA.214	lsm3	ter1	-	SPNG585	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Tang W (2012)	22446625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 1C.	-	BIOGRID
664526	2540475	9407016	277003	1028379	SPBC30D10.06	SPNCRNA.214	lsm4	ter1	-	SPNG585	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Tang W (2012)	22446625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 1C.	-	BIOGRID
664527	2539322	9407016	275888	1028379	SPCC1840.10	SPNCRNA.214	lsm8	ter1	-	SPNG585	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Tang W (2012)	22446625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 1C.	-	BIOGRID
664528	2540475	9407016	277003	1028379	SPBC30D10.06	SPNCRNA.214	lsm4	ter1	-	SPNG585	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tang W (2012)	22446625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 5B.|figure S2.	-	BIOGRID
664529	2540601	9407016	277127	1028379	SPBC29A3.14c	SPNCRNA.214	trt1	ter1	-	SPNG585	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tang W (2012)	22446625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 5B.	-	BIOGRID
664530	2542684	9407016	279137	1028379	SPAC26A3.08	SPNCRNA.214	smb1	ter1	smb	SPNG585	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tang W (2012)	22446625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure S2.	-	BIOGRID
664531	2539607	9407016	276165	1028379	SPBC11G11.06c	SPNCRNA.214	sme1	ter1	-	SPNG585	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tang W (2012)	22446625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure S2.	-	BIOGRID
664532	2540330	9407016	276860	1028379	SPBC3E7.14	SPNCRNA.214	smf1	ter1	SPBC4F6.01	SPNG585	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tang W (2012)	22446625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure S2.	-	BIOGRID
664533	2542480	9407016	278940	1028379	SPAC2C4.03c	SPNCRNA.214	smd2	ter1	cwf9	SPNG585	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tang W (2012)	22446625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure S2.	-	BIOGRID
664534	2540212	9407016	276745	1028379	SPBC9B6.05c	SPNCRNA.214	lsm3	ter1	-	SPNG585	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tang W (2012)	22446625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure S2.	-	BIOGRID
664535	2541997	9407016	278481	1028379	SPAC2F3.17c	SPNCRNA.214	lsm6	ter1	-	SPNG585	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tang W (2012)	22446625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure S2.	-	BIOGRID
664536	2538804	9407016	275385	1028379	SPCC1620.01c	SPNCRNA.214	lsm2	ter1	-	SPNG585	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tang W (2012)	22446625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure S2.	-	BIOGRID
664537	2540723	9407016	277246	1028379	SPBC20F10.09	SPNCRNA.214	lsm5	ter1	-	SPNG585	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tang W (2012)	22446625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure S2.	-	BIOGRID
664538	2538964	9407016	275538	1028379	SPCC285.12	SPNCRNA.214	lsm7	ter1	-	SPNG585	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tang W (2012)	22446625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure S2.	-	BIOGRID
664613	2539280	2540239	275848	276771	SPCC330.10	SPBC32H8.10	pcm1	cdk9	-	SPACTOKYO_453.22	Reconstituted Complex	physical	St Amour CV (2012)	22508988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 1A. The Cdk9 carboxyl terminus is required to bind Pcm1 in vitro.|figure 1B. in vitro translated Cdk9/Pch1.	-	BIOGRID
664614	2539280	2540237	275848	276769	SPCC330.10	SPBC32F12.06	pcm1	pch1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	St Amour CV (2012)	22508988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 1A. The Cdk9 carboxyl terminus is required to bind Pcm1 in vitro.|figure 1B. in vitro translated Cdk9/Pch1.	-	BIOGRID
664615	2540239	2541916	276771	278406	SPBC32H8.10	SPAC23C4.19	cdk9	spt5	SPACTOKYO_453.22	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	St Amour CV (2012)	22508988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	data not shown, mentioned in figure 1 legend.|figure 1F. Cdk9 was activated by Csk1 phosphorylation.	-	BIOGRID
664616	2540237	2541916	276769	278406	SPBC32F12.06	SPAC23C4.19	pch1	spt5	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	St Amour CV (2012)	22508988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	data not shown, mentioned in figure 1 legend.|figure 1F. Cdk9 was activated by Csk1 phosphorylation.	-	BIOGRID
664617	2540292	2540239	276823	276771	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC32H8.10	rpb1	cdk9	-	SPACTOKYO_453.22	Reconstituted Complex	physical	St Amour CV (2012)	22508988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 1D. C-terminus of Cdk9 is required for the binding to Spb1 in vitro.	-	BIOGRID
664618	2540292	2540237	276823	276769	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC32F12.06	rpb1	pch1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	St Amour CV (2012)	22508988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 1D. C-terminus of Cdk9 is required for the binding to Spb1 in vitro.	-	BIOGRID
664619	2543327	2540239	279750	276771	SPAC1D4.06c	SPBC32H8.10	csk1	cdk9	-	SPACTOKYO_453.22	Biochemical Activity	physical	St Amour CV (2012)	22508988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	figure 1E. Cdk9 was activated by Csk1 phosphorylation.	-	BIOGRID
664620	2540239	2542112	276771	278588	SPBC32H8.10	SPAC1687.11	cdk9	spb1	SPACTOKYO_453.22	pmt2	Biochemical Activity	physical	St Amour CV (2012)	22508988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	figure 1E. Cdk9 was activated by Csk1 phosphorylation.|figure 6A.|figure 6C.	-	BIOGRID
664621	2540237	2542112	276769	278588	SPBC32F12.06	SPAC1687.11	pch1	spb1	-	pmt2	Biochemical Activity	physical	St Amour CV (2012)	22508988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	figure 1E. Cdk9 was activated by Csk1 phosphorylation.	-	BIOGRID
664622	2539280	2540237	275848	276769	SPCC330.10	SPBC32F12.06	pcm1	pch1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	St Amour CV (2012)	22508988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 2. Cdk9C has normal kinase activity but cannot bind Pcm1 in vivo	-	BIOGRID
664623	2539280	2540239	275848	276771	SPCC330.10	SPBC32H8.10	pcm1	cdk9	-	SPACTOKYO_453.22	Dosage Rescue	genetic	St Amour CV (2012)	22508988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	growth in exponential phase[growth in exponential phase]	figure 5. Overexpression of Pcm1 rescues cdk9C phenotypes.	-	BIOGRID
664624	2540471	2542112	276999	278588	SPBC19F8.07	SPAC1687.11	mcs6	spb1	cdk7|crk1|mop1	pmt2	Biochemical Activity	physical	St Amour CV (2012)	22508988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	figure 6.mentioned in the figure legend.|figure 6C.	-	BIOGRID
664625	1022	2542112	107457	278588	-	SPAC1687.11	CDK7	spb1	CAK1|CDKN7|HCAK|MO15|STK1|p39MO15	pmt2	Biochemical Activity	physical	St Amour CV (2012)	22508988	9606	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	figure 6B.	-	BIOGRID
664626	2542409	2542409	278873	278873	SPAC17G8.10c	SPAC17G8.10c	dma1	dma1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Johnson AE (2012)	22669973	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 1A.|figure 3.	-	BIOGRID
664627	2542409	2542409	278873	278873	SPAC17G8.10c	SPAC17G8.10c	dma1	dma1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Johnson AE (2012)	22669973	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 1B.	-	BIOGRID
664628	2542409	2542409	278873	278873	SPAC17G8.10c	SPAC17G8.10c	dma1	dma1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Johnson AE (2012)	22669973	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 2. forms dimer and tetramer.	-	BIOGRID
664629	2542409	2540650	278873	277175	SPAC17G8.10c	SPBC244.01c	dma1	sid4	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Johnson AE (2012)	22669973	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 4.	-	BIOGRID
664670	2539869	2542632	276415	279086	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC24H6.05	cdc2	cdc25	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	sal2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lu LX (2012)	22665807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
664671	2539560	2539560	276121	276121	SPCC736.08	SPCC736.08	cbf11	cbf11	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664672	2539560	2540403	276121	276931	SPCC736.08	SPBC21D10.11c	cbf11	nfs1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664673	2539560	2539285	276121	275853	SPCC736.08	SPCC1672.02c	cbf11	sap1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664674	2539560	2540541	276121	277068	SPCC736.08	SPBC1A4.03c	cbf11	top2	-	ptr11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664675	2539560	2541094	276121	277609	SPCC736.08	SPBC651.08c	cbf11	rpc1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664676	2539560	2540713	276121	277236	SPCC736.08	SPBC18E5.12c	cbf11	mas2	-	SPBC23G7.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664677	2539560	2542638	276121	279092	SPCC736.08	SPAC1250.01	cbf11	snf21	-	SPAC29A4.21|brg1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664678	2539560	2540259	276121	276790	SPCC736.08	SPBC530.08	cbf11	SPBC530.08	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664679	2539560	2541756	276121	278250	SPCC736.08	SPAC8C9.14	cbf11	prr1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664680	2539560	2541956	276121	278443	SPCC736.08	SPAC139.03	cbf11	toe2	-	SPAC139.03	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664681	2539560	2543393	276121	279815	SPCC736.08	SPAC4G9.08c	cbf11	rpc2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664682	2539560	2542701	276121	279154	SPCC736.08	SPAC26H5.05	cbf11	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664683	2539560	2541158	276121	277673	SPCC736.08	SPBC660.13c	cbf11	ssb1	-	rad11|rpa1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664684	2539560	2539631	276121	276187	SPCC736.08	SPBC16G5.16	cbf11	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664685	2539560	2541300	276121	277812	SPCC736.08	SPBP23A10.15c	cbf11	qcr1	-	mas1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664686	2539560	2539633	276121	276189	SPCC736.08	SPBC1826.01c	cbf11	mot1	-	SPBC25B2.12.c|SPBC6B1.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664687	2539560	2541581	276121	278078	SPCC736.08	SPAC1486.10	cbf11	thi1	-	SPAC6G10.01|ntf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664688	2539560	2542140	276121	278616	SPCC736.08	SPAC1783.07c	cbf11	pap1	-	caf3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664689	2539560	2542976	276121	279414	SPCC736.08	SPAC9E9.09c	cbf11	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664690	2539560	2542724	276121	279175	SPCC736.08	SPAC767.01c	cbf11	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664691	2539560	2540305	276121	276835	SPCC736.08	SPBC337.05c	cbf11	cct8	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664692	2539560	2542363	276121	278827	SPCC736.08	SPAC1783.05	cbf11	hrp1	-	chd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664693	2539560	2540099	276121	276637	SPCC736.08	SPBC16H5.11c	cbf11	skb1	-	rmt5	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664694	2539560	2539827	276121	276376	SPCC736.08	SPBC1861.02	cbf11	abp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664695	2539560	2540219	276121	276752	SPCC736.08	SPBC31F10.13c	cbf11	hip1	-	hir1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664696	2539560	2541044	276121	277559	SPCC736.08	SPBC354.05c	cbf11	sre2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664697	2539560	2540567	276121	277094	SPCC736.08	SPBC1A4.08c	cbf11	cct3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664698	2539560	2541060	276121	277575	SPCC736.08	SPBC56F2.09c	cbf11	arg5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664699	2539560	2538885	276121	275463	SPCC736.08	SPCC330.13	cbf11	rpc37	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664700	2539560	2540632	276121	277158	SPCC736.08	SPBC28F2.09	cbf11	toa1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664701	2539560	2541540	276121	278040	SPCC736.08	SPAC1071.06	cbf11	arp9	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664702	2539560	2540329	276121	276859	SPCC736.08	SPBC29B5.01	cbf11	atf1	-	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664703	2539560	2542201	276121	278676	SPCC736.08	SPAC17G8.03c	cbf11	dpb3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664704	2539560	2542173	276121	278648	SPCC736.08	SPAC17H9.02	cbf11	mtl1	-	SPAC17H9.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664705	2539560	2542799	276121	279247	SPCC736.08	SPAC1687.01	cbf11	rpc19	-	SPAPYUL23.01|rpa17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664706	2539560	2543626	276121	280040	SPCC736.08	SPAC4D7.08c	cbf11	ade4	-	aza1|min13	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664707	2539560	2540749	276121	277271	SPCC736.08	SPBC4B4.03	cbf11	rsc1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664708	2539560	2540903	276121	277419	SPCC736.08	SPBC530.05	cbf11	prt1	-	SPBC530.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664709	2539560	2539999	276121	276543	SPCC736.08	SPBC1734.15	cbf11	rsc4	-	brd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664710	2539560	2542467	276121	278928	SPCC736.08	SPAC1834.04	cbf11	hht1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664711	2539560	2541582	276121	278079	SPCC736.08	SPAC29E6.08	cbf11	tbp1	-	SPAC30.12|tbp|tdf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664712	2539560	2539804	276121	276354	SPCC736.08	SPBC1105.11c	cbf11	hht3	-	h3.3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664713	2539560	2541220	276121	277734	SPCC736.08	SPBC8D2.04	cbf11	hht2	-	h3.2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664714	2539560	2539971	276121	276515	SPCC736.08	SPBC1105.04c	cbf11	cbp1	-	abp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664715	2539560	2541045	276121	277560	SPCC736.08	SPBC543.03c	cbf11	pku80	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664716	2539560	2538992	276121	275566	SPCC736.08	SPCC290.02	cbf11	rpc34	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664717	2539560	2541933	276121	278421	SPCC736.08	SPAC2F3.04c	cbf11	rim1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664718	2539560	2540406	276121	276934	SPCC736.08	SPBC30D10.02	cbf11	SPBC30D10.02	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664719	2539560	2542406	276121	278870	SPCC736.08	SPAC17A5.13	cbf11	SPAC17A5.13	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664720	2539560	2541438	276121	277943	SPCC736.08	SPAC23G3.10c	cbf11	ssr3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664721	2539560	2540501	276121	277029	SPCC736.08	SPBC27B12.11c	cbf11	pho7	-	SPBC27B12.11c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664722	2539560	2540273	276121	276804	SPCC736.08	SPBC30D10.13c	cbf11	pdb1	-	agg1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664723	2539560	2541088	276121	277603	SPCC736.08	SPBC609.05	cbf11	pob3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664724	2539560	2541851	276121	278342	SPCC736.08	SPAC23H3.10	cbf11	ssr2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664725	2539560	2538851	276121	275432	SPCC736.08	SPCC18.07	cbf11	rpc53	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664726	2539560	2543563	276121	279979	SPCC736.08	SPAC664.02c	cbf11	arp8	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664727	2539560	2541031	276121	277546	SPCC736.08	SPBC365.10	cbf11	arp5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664728	2539560	2541388	276121	277899	SPCC736.08	SPBP8B7.30c	cbf11	thi5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664729	2539560	2543086	276121	279519	SPCC736.08	SPAC30D11.10	cbf11	rad52	-	rad22|rad22A	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664730	2539560	2539144	276121	275716	SPCC736.08	SPCC16A11.14	cbf11	sfh1	-	SPNCRNA.125	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664731	2539560	2542868	276121	279313	SPCC736.08	SPAC1420.02c	cbf11	cct5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664732	2539560	2540032	276121	276575	SPCC736.08	SPBC1703.14c	cbf11	top1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664733	2539560	2540582	276121	277108	SPCC736.08	SPBC26H8.07c	cbf11	nda3	-	alp12|ben1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664734	2539560	2541301	276121	277813	SPCC736.08	SPBP23A10.05	cbf11	ssr4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664735	2539560	2543092	276121	279525	SPCC736.08	SPAC1327.01c	cbf11	SPAC1327.01c	-	SPAC1783.09c|SPAC18G6.16c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664736	2539560	2542240	276121	278712	SPCC736.08	SPAC19A8.15	cbf11	trp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664737	2539560	2539090	276121	275662	SPCC736.08	SPCC126.02c	cbf11	pku70	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664738	2539560	2538836	276121	275417	SPCC736.08	SPCC1281.05	cbf11	rsc7	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664739	2539560	2543254	276121	279682	SPCC736.08	SPAC1006.03c	cbf11	red1	-	iss3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664740	2539560	3361482	276121	280558	SPCC736.08	SPAPB24D3.01	cbf11	toe3	-	SPAPB24D3.01|SPAPB2C8.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664741	2539560	2539798	276121	276348	SPCC736.08	SPBC146.14c	cbf11	sec26	-	SPBC337.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664742	2539560	2541265	276121	277779	SPCC736.08	SPBP16F5.03c	cbf11	tra1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664743	2539560	2538698	276121	275283	SPCC736.08	SPCC1442.02	cbf11	SPCC1442.02	-	SPCC1450.18	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664744	2539560	2541441	276121	277946	SPCC736.08	SPAC1F7.09c	cbf11	SPAC1F7.09c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664745	2539560	2541541	276121	278041	SPCC736.08	SPAC1F7.11c	cbf11	SPAC1F7.11c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664746	2539560	2542107	276121	278583	SPCC736.08	SPAC30.01c	cbf11	sec72	-	sec7b|sec702	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664747	2539560	2541284	276121	277797	SPCC736.08	SPBC947.08c	cbf11	hip4	-	hpc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664748	2539560	2541412	276121	277920	SPCC736.08	SPBPJ4664.04	cbf11	SPBPJ4664.04	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664749	2539560	2539078	276121	275650	SPCC736.08	SPCC1259.04	cbf11	iec3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664750	2539560	2541852	276121	278343	SPCC736.08	SPAC23H3.09c	cbf11	gly1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664751	2539560	2543290	276121	279715	SPCC736.08	SPAC9E9.10c	cbf11	cbh1	-	cbh	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664752	2539560	2540271	276121	276802	SPCC736.08	SPBC30D10.08	cbf11	mgm101	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664753	2539560	2542665	276121	279118	SPCC736.08	SPAC10F6.08c	cbf11	nht10	-	nht1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664754	2539560	2542732	276121	279182	SPCC736.08	SPAC25G10.07c	cbf11	cut7	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664755	2539560	2542939	276121	279380	SPCC736.08	SPAC8C9.08	cbf11	rps5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664756	2539560	2539948	276121	276492	SPCC736.08	SPBC1703.02	cbf11	rsc9	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664757	2539560	2540656	276121	277181	SPCC736.08	SPBC23E6.09	cbf11	ssn6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664758	2539560	2540510	276121	277038	SPCC736.08	SPBC2G5.07c	cbf11	rpc25	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664759	2539560	2540207	276121	276740	SPCC736.08	SPBP8B7.17c	cbf11	SPBP8B7.17c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664760	2539560	2541710	276121	278205	SPCC736.08	SPAC343.11c	cbf11	msc1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664761	2539560	2543421	276121	279843	SPCC736.08	SPAC3G9.14	cbf11	sak1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664762	2539560	2541128	276121	277643	SPCC736.08	SPBC646.11	cbf11	cct6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664763	2539560	2541649	276121	278145	SPCC736.08	SPAC1F3.06c	cbf11	spo15	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664764	2539560	2542028	276121	278510	SPCC736.08	SPAC2F3.09	cbf11	hem1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664765	2539560	3361462	276121	280538	SPCC736.08	SPAC3A11.12c	cbf11	rpt5	-	pam2|tbp1|SPAC3H5.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664766	2539560	2543653	276121	280067	SPCC736.08	SPAPB1E7.10	cbf11	rpc17	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664767	2539560	2540053	276121	276591	SPCC736.08	SPBC106.06	cbf11	cct4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664768	2539560	2539699	276121	276252	SPCC736.08	SPBC11G11.05	cbf11	rpa34	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664769	2539560	2538859	276121	275439	SPCC736.08	SPCC553.11c	cbf11	toa2	-	SPCC553.11c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664770	2539560	2542546	276121	279003	SPCC736.08	SPAC1399.05c	cbf11	toe1	-	SPAC1399.05c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664771	2539560	2541496	276121	277998	SPCC736.08	SPAC23D3.09	cbf11	arp42	-	arp4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664772	2539560	2539728	276121	276280	SPCC736.08	SPBC14F5.12c	cbf11	cbh2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664773	2539560	2540626	276121	277152	SPCC736.08	SPBC21C3.08c	cbf11	car2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664774	2539560	2540936	276121	277452	SPCC736.08	SPBC800.05c	cbf11	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664775	2539560	3361514	276121	280590	SPCC736.08	SPAC110.04c	cbf11	pss1	-	SPAP14E8.01c|ssp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664776	2539560	2541522	276121	278023	SPCC736.08	SPAC23E2.01	cbf11	fep1	-	gaf2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664777	2539560	2543408	276121	279830	SPCC736.08	SPAC637.05c	cbf11	vma2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664778	2539560	2542856	276121	279302	SPCC736.08	SPAC6F12.11c	cbf11	sfc1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664779	2539560	2539864	276121	276411	SPCC736.08	SPBC16A3.15c	cbf11	nda2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664780	2539560	2540227	276121	276759	SPCC736.08	SPBC31F10.14c	cbf11	hip3	-	hir3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664781	2539560	2540246	276121	276778	SPCC736.08	SPBC336.07	cbf11	sfc3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664782	2539560	2539187	276121	275758	SPCC736.08	SPCC16C4.14c	cbf11	sfc4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664783	2539560	2542338	276121	278804	SPCC736.08	SPAC16E8.01	cbf11	shd1	-	sla1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664784	2539560	2542047	276121	278528	SPCC736.08	SPAC21E11.03c	cbf11	pcr1	-	mts2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664785	2539560	2541531	276121	278031	SPCC736.08	SPAC25A8.01c	cbf11	fft3	-	snf2SR	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664786	2539560	2539398	276121	275963	SPCC736.08	SPCC965.10	cbf11	SPCC965.10	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664787	2539560	2541762	276121	278256	SPCC736.08	SPAC139.01c	cbf11	SPAC139.01c	-	SPAC955.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664788	2539560	2542785	276121	279234	SPCC736.08	SPAC15A10.02	cbf11	taf12	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664789	2539560	2539863	276121	276410	SPCC736.08	SPBC14F5.03c	cbf11	kap123	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664790	2539560	2540050	276121	276588	SPCC736.08	SPBC16C6.13c	cbf11	sec27	-	SPBC244.03	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664791	2539560	2540464	276121	276992	SPCC736.08	SPBC23E6.02	cbf11	rrp2	-	SPBC23E6.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664792	2539560	2539353	276121	275919	SPCC736.08	SPCC5E4.03c	cbf11	taf5	-	taf72	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664793	2539560	2542299	276121	278766	SPCC736.08	SPAC18B11.10	cbf11	tup11	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664794	2539560	9407262	276121	1028625	SPCC736.08	SPAPB1E7.14	cbf11	iec5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664795	2539560	2540191	276121	276724	SPCC736.08	SPBC17D11.07c	cbf11	rpn2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664796	2539560	2540695	276121	277219	SPCC736.08	SPBC19G7.01c	cbf11	msh2	-	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664797	2539560	2540616	276121	277142	SPCC736.08	SPBC215.09c	cbf11	erg10	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664798	2539560	2540210	276121	276743	SPCC736.08	SPBC9B6.04c	cbf11	tuf1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664799	2539560	2539099	276121	275671	SPCC736.08	SPCC24B10.22	cbf11	pog1	-	SPCPB16A4.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664800	2539560	2542854	276121	279300	SPCC736.08	SPAC144.02	cbf11	iec1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664801	2539560	2542233	276121	278705	SPCC736.08	SPAC1B3.12c	cbf11	rpb10	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664802	2539560	2543064	276121	279497	SPCC736.08	SPAC3G6.01	cbf11	hrp3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664803	2539560	2543562	276121	279978	SPCC736.08	SPAC4H3.09	cbf11	SPAC4H3.09	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664804	2539560	2543410	276121	279832	SPCC736.08	SPAC821.11	cbf11	pro1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664805	2539560	2543585	276121	280000	SPCC736.08	SPAC9.09	cbf11	met26	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664806	2539560	2539907	276121	276453	SPCC736.08	SPBC1198.04c	cbf11	zas1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664807	2539560	2539168	276121	275739	SPCC736.08	SPCC1620.08	cbf11	SPCC1620.08	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664808	2539560	2542212	276121	278686	SPCC736.08	SPAC1D4.04	cbf11	cct2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664809	2539560	2541419	276121	277925	SPCC736.08	SPAC1F3.07c	cbf11	rsc58	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664810	2539560	2541927	276121	278415	SPCC736.08	SPAC222.12c	cbf11	atp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664811	2539560	2542687	276121	279140	SPCC736.08	SPAC26H5.12	cbf11	rpo41	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664812	2539560	2541754	276121	278248	SPCC736.08	SPAC2E1P3.04	cbf11	cao1	-	spao1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664813	2539560	2543226	276121	279654	SPCC736.08	SPAC6B12.05c	cbf11	ies2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664814	2539560	2541151	276121	277666	SPCC736.08	SPBC713.03	cbf11	SPBC713.03	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664815	2539560	2539378	276121	275944	SPCC736.08	SPCC1795.04c	cbf11	pre10	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664816	2539560	2542465	276121	278926	SPCC736.08	SPAC19G12.10c	cbf11	cpy1	-	pcy1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664817	2539560	2541446	276121	277951	SPCC736.08	SPAC23G3.01	cbf11	rpb2	-	SPAC521.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664818	2539560	2541807	276121	278298	SPCC736.08	SPAC23G3.11	cbf11	rpn6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664819	2539560	2543636	276121	280050	SPCC736.08	SPAC3H8.08c	cbf11	SPAC3H8.08c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664820	2539560	2540071	276121	276609	SPCC736.08	SPBC13E7.10c	cbf11	brf1	-	SPBC30D10.20	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664821	2539560	2540408	276121	276936	SPCC736.08	SPBC25H2.11c	cbf11	spt7	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664822	2539560	2541253	276121	277767	SPCC736.08	SPBC8D2.07c	cbf11	sfc9	-	SPBC8D2.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664823	2539560	2538881	276121	275460	SPCC736.08	SPCC1620.14c	cbf11	snf22	-	SPCC830.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664824	2539560	2538811	276121	275392	SPCC736.08	SPCC330.03c	cbf11	SPCC330.03c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664825	2539560	2542948	276121	279388	SPCC736.08	SPAC1006.07	cbf11	SPAC1006.07	-	tif1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664826	2539560	3361561	276121	280637	SPCC736.08	SPAC11E3.01c	cbf11	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664827	2539560	2542861	276121	279307	SPCC736.08	SPAC13G7.13c	cbf11	msa1	-	SPAC6C3.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664828	2539560	2541690	276121	278186	SPCC736.08	SPAC1556.02c	cbf11	sdh1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664829	2539560	2541608	276121	278105	SPCC736.08	SPAC2F3.16	cbf11	SPAC2F3.16	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664830	2539560	2543084	276121	279517	SPCC736.08	SPAC31G5.19	cbf11	abo1	-	SPAC31G5.19	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664831	2539560	2543221	276121	279649	SPCC736.08	SPAC637.04	cbf11	SPAC637.04	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664832	2539560	2542795	276121	279243	SPCC736.08	SPAC9G1.05	cbf11	aip1	-	SPAC9G1.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664833	2539560	2539930	276121	276474	SPCC736.08	SPBC1198.11c	cbf11	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664834	2539560	2540018	276121	276562	SPCC736.08	SPBC12C2.10c	cbf11	pst1	-	SPBC21D10.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664835	2539560	2539817	276121	276367	SPCC736.08	SPBC146.03c	cbf11	cut3	-	smc4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664836	2539560	2541030	276121	277545	SPCC736.08	SPBC337.08c	cbf11	ubi4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664837	2539560	2541213	276121	277727	SPCC736.08	SPBC887.14c	cbf11	pfh1	-	pif1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664838	2539560	2541245	276121	277759	SPCC736.08	SPBC8D2.06	cbf11	irs1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664839	2539560	2541281	276121	277794	SPCC736.08	SPBC902.04	cbf11	rmn1	-	SPBC902.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664840	2539560	2541298	276121	277810	SPCC736.08	SPBP23A10.13	cbf11	orc4	-	orp4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664841	2539560	2538924	276121	275501	SPCC736.08	SPCC1620.06c	cbf11	SPCC1620.06c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664842	2539560	2538775	276121	275357	SPCC736.08	SPCC23B6.05c	cbf11	ssb3	-	rpa3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664843	2539560	2539463	276121	276026	SPCC736.08	SPCC550.11	cbf11	SPCC550.11	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664844	2539560	2542839	276121	279285	SPCC736.08	SPAC13G7.12c	cbf11	SPAC13G7.12c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664845	2539560	2542344	276121	278810	SPCC736.08	SPAC1751.01c	cbf11	gti1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664846	2539560	2542188	276121	278663	SPCC736.08	SPAC17H9.01	cbf11	cid16	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664847	2539560	2541949	276121	278436	SPCC736.08	SPAC222.04c	cbf11	ies6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664848	2539560	2541548	276121	278048	SPCC736.08	SPAC25B8.16	cbf11	pop100	-	SPAC25B8.16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664849	2539560	2542667	276121	279120	SPCC736.08	SPAC26A3.16	cbf11	dph1	-	ucp5	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664850	2539560	2542163	276121	278639	SPCC736.08	SPAC29A4.15	cbf11	SPAC29A4.15	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664851	2539560	2543402	276121	279824	SPCC736.08	SPAC630.14c	cbf11	tup12	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664852	2539560	2539658	276121	276213	SPCC736.08	SPBC1105.17	cbf11	cnp1	-	sim2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664853	2539560	2540213	276121	276746	SPCC736.08	SPBC17D1.06	cbf11	dbp3	-	SPCC17D1.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664854	2539560	2540460	276121	276988	SPCC736.08	SPBC2A9.07c	cbf11	hpz1	-	SPBC2A9.07c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664855	2539560	2540318	276121	276848	SPCC736.08	SPBC30B4.04c	cbf11	sol1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664856	2539560	2541231	276121	277745	SPCC736.08	SPBC887.01	cbf11	SPBC887.01	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664857	2539560	2538949	276121	275523	SPCC736.08	SPCC320.03	cbf11	SPCC320.03	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664858	2539560	2542496	276121	278955	SPCC736.08	SPAC1B1.03c	cbf11	kap95	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664859	2539560	2541729	276121	278223	SPCC736.08	SPAC22H12.02	cbf11	tfg3	-	taf14	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664860	2539560	2541721	276121	278215	SPCC736.08	SPAC23G3.09	cbf11	taf4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664861	2539560	2541574	276121	278071	SPCC736.08	SPAC25B8.11	cbf11	SPAC25B8.11	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664862	2539560	2543675	276121	280089	SPCC736.08	SPAC4D7.10c	cbf11	spt20	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664863	2539560	2541655	276121	278151	SPCC736.08	SPAC7D4.14c	cbf11	iss10	-	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664864	2539560	2543325	276121	279748	SPCC736.08	SPAC977.14c	cbf11	SPAC977.14c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664865	2539560	2543602	276121	280017	SPCC736.08	SPAPB1A11.04c	cbf11	mca1	-	SPAPB1A11.04c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664866	2539560	2540066	276121	276604	SPCC736.08	SPBC1198.02	cbf11	dea2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664867	2539560	2539975	276121	276519	SPCC736.08	SPBC12C2.06	cbf11	dbp5	-	SPBC12C2.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664868	2539560	2539812	276121	276362	SPCC736.08	SPBC1347.02	cbf11	fkbp39	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664869	2539560	2540072	276121	276610	SPCC736.08	SPBC16H5.07c	cbf11	ppa2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664870	2539560	2540292	276121	276823	SPCC736.08	SPBC28F2.12	cbf11	rpb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664871	2539560	2540441	276121	276969	SPCC736.08	SPBC2G5.05	cbf11	SPBC2G5.05	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664872	2539560	2540368	276121	276897	SPCC736.08	SPBC36.05c	cbf11	clr6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664873	2539560	2541039	276121	277554	SPCC736.08	SPBC3B9.19	cbf11	mge1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664874	2539560	2540956	276121	277472	SPCC736.08	SPBC409.06	cbf11	uch2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664875	2539560	2538758	276121	275341	SPCC736.08	SPCC1739.12	cbf11	ppe1	-	esp1|ppx1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664876	2539560	2538806	276121	275387	SPCC736.08	SPCC1840.09	cbf11	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664877	2539560	2539121	276121	275693	SPCC736.08	SPCC188.03	cbf11	cnd3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664878	2539560	2538953	276121	275527	SPCC736.08	SPCC285.08	cbf11	ret2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664879	2539560	2539215	276121	275785	SPCC736.08	SPCC285.16c	cbf11	msh6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664880	2539560	2538744	276121	275327	SPCC736.08	SPCC306.03c	cbf11	cnd2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664881	2539560	2539018	276121	275591	SPCC736.08	SPCC338.12	cbf11	pbi2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664882	2539560	2539572	276121	276132	SPCC736.08	SPCC576.03c	cbf11	tpx1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664883	2539560	2542174	276121	278649	SPCC736.08	SPAC17A5.06	cbf11	ptr8	-	ercc3sp	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664884	2539560	2542155	276121	278631	SPCC736.08	SPAC17G8.06c	cbf11	SPAC17G8.06c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664885	2539560	2542270	276121	278739	SPCC736.08	SPAC17H9.14c	cbf11	pdi2	-	SPAC17H9.14c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664886	2539560	2542513	276121	278971	SPCC736.08	SPAC1952.05	cbf11	gcn5	-	kat2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664887	2539560	2541890	276121	278380	SPCC736.08	SPAC22G7.09c	cbf11	nup45	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664888	2539560	2542236	276121	278708	SPCC736.08	SPAC30D11.08c	cbf11	phf2	-	saf60|swp2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664889	2539560	2543040	276121	279475	SPCC736.08	SPAC31G5.13	cbf11	rpn11	-	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664890	2539560	2543595	276121	280010	SPCC736.08	SPAC4G9.11c	cbf11	cmb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664891	2539560	2543462	276121	279882	SPCC736.08	SPAC644.16	cbf11	SPAC644.16	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664892	2539560	2543646	276121	280060	SPCC736.08	SPAC821.07c	cbf11	moc3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664893	2539560	2543659	276121	280073	SPCC736.08	SPAC922.07c	cbf11	atd2	-	SPAC922.07c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664894	2539560	2540159	276121	276694	SPCC736.08	SPBC12C2.08	cbf11	dnm1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664895	2539560	2540020	276121	276564	SPCC736.08	SPBC16D10.09	cbf11	pcn1	-	pcn	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664896	2539560	2539675	276121	276230	SPCC736.08	SPBC1718.03	cbf11	ker1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664897	2539560	2539793	276121	276343	SPCC736.08	SPBC1734.16c	cbf11	pst3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664898	2539560	2540738	276121	277261	SPCC736.08	SPBC211.07c	cbf11	ubc8	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664899	2539560	2540607	276121	277133	SPCC736.08	SPBC23G7.07c	cbf11	cms1	-	SPBC23G7.07c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664900	2539560	2540436	276121	276964	SPCC736.08	SPBC28F2.10c	cbf11	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664901	2539560	2540255	276121	276786	SPCC736.08	SPBC336.04	cbf11	cdc6	-	mis10|pol3|pold	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664902	2539560	2540232	276121	276764	SPCC736.08	SPBC336.10c	cbf11	tif512	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664903	2539560	2541146	276121	277661	SPCC736.08	SPBC660.16	cbf11	SPBC660.16	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664904	2539560	2541319	276121	277831	SPCC736.08	SPBP4H10.06c	cbf11	cut14	-	smc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664905	2539560	2538957	276121	275531	SPCC736.08	SPCC1223.09	cbf11	SPCC1223.09	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664906	2539560	2539094	276121	275666	SPCC736.08	SPCC330.02	cbf11	rhp7	-	SPCC613.14	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664907	2539560	2539341	276121	275907	SPCC736.08	SPCC622.10c	cbf11	sec5	-	SPCC622.10c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664908	2539560	2539093	276121	275665	SPCC736.08	SPCC736.15	cbf11	pil1	-	SPCC736.15	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664909	2539560	2539592	276121	276150	SPCC736.08	SPCC794.12c	cbf11	mae2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664910	2539560	2543133	276121	279565	SPCC736.08	SPAC12G12.05c	cbf11	taf9	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664911	2539560	2542829	276121	279276	SPCC736.08	SPAC13D6.02c	cbf11	byr3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664912	2539560	2542855	276121	279301	SPCC736.08	SPAC144.04c	cbf11	spe1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664913	2539560	2542809	276121	279257	SPCC736.08	SPAC15A10.11	cbf11	ubr11	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664914	2539560	2542336	276121	278802	SPCC736.08	SPAC16E8.11c	cbf11	tfb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664915	2539560	2542001	276121	278485	SPCC736.08	SPAC20G8.06	cbf11	not1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664916	2539560	2542668	276121	279121	SPCC736.08	SPAC26A3.15c	cbf11	nsp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664917	2539560	2542287	276121	278755	SPCC736.08	SPAC6F6.10c	cbf11	arc2	-	arc34	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664918	2539560	2543668	276121	280082	SPCC736.08	SPAC9.05	cbf11	fml1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664919	2539560	3361378	276121	280454	SPCC736.08	SPAPB17E12.14c	cbf11	SPAPB17E12.14c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664920	2539560	2539869	276121	276415	SPCC736.08	SPBC11B10.09	cbf11	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664921	2539560	2539902	276121	276448	SPCC736.08	SPBC11G11.02c	cbf11	end3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664922	2539560	2539992	276121	276536	SPCC736.08	SPBC1289.04c	cbf11	pob1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664923	2539560	2540138	276121	276675	SPCC736.08	SPBC16C6.02c	cbf11	vps1302	-	vps13b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664924	2539560	2540269	276121	276800	SPCC736.08	SPBC28F2.03	cbf11	ppi1	-	cyp2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664925	2539560	2540523	276121	277051	SPCC736.08	SPBC29A10.10c	cbf11	dbl8	-	SPBC29A10.10c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664926	2539560	2541079	276121	277594	SPCC736.08	SPBC543.09	cbf11	yta12	-	m-AAA	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664927	2539560	2541117	276121	277632	SPCC736.08	SPBC646.13	cbf11	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664928	2539560	2541326	276121	277838	SPCC736.08	SPBP35G2.03c	cbf11	sgo1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664929	2539560	2538912	276121	275489	SPCC736.08	SPCC1682.10	cbf11	rpn8	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664930	2539560	2538909	276121	275486	SPCC736.08	SPCC1919.14c	cbf11	bdp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664931	2539560	2539432	276121	275995	SPCC736.08	SPCC965.05c	cbf11	thp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664932	2539560	2542875	276121	279320	SPCC736.08	SPAC13G7.02c	cbf11	ssa1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664933	2539560	2542463	276121	278924	SPCC736.08	SPAC1834.03c	cbf11	hhf1	-	h4.1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664934	2539560	2539991	276121	276535	SPCC736.08	SPBC1105.12	cbf11	hhf3	-	h4.3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664935	2539560	2541200	276121	277714	SPCC736.08	SPBC8D2.03c	cbf11	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664936	2539560	2543026	276121	279462	SPCC736.08	SPAC664.11	cbf11	ssc1	-	ssp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664937	2539560	2542651	276121	279105	SPCC736.08	SPAC24C9.12c	cbf11	SPAC24C9.12c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664938	2539560	2540975	276121	277491	SPCC736.08	SPBC354.12	cbf11	gpd3	-	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664939	2539560	2542400	276121	278864	SPCC736.08	SPAC17G6.10	cbf11	ssr1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664940	2539560	2543131	276121	279563	SPCC736.08	SPAC12G12.04	cbf11	mcp60	-	hsp60	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664941	2539560	2541695	276121	278191	SPCC736.08	SPAC1F7.05	cbf11	cdc22	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664942	2539560	2541268	276121	277782	SPCC736.08	SPBP19A11.03c	cbf11	mts4	-	rpn1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664943	2539560	2542869	276121	279314	SPCC736.08	SPAC140.02	cbf11	gar2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664944	2539560	2541712	276121	278207	SPCC736.08	SPAC328.10c	cbf11	rps502	-	rps5-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664945	2539560	2542664	276121	279117	SPCC736.08	SPAC1071.10c	cbf11	pma1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664946	2539560	2541526	276121	278026	SPCC736.08	SPAC14C4.14	cbf11	atp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664947	2539560	2540431	276121	276959	SPCC736.08	SPBC19C7.06	cbf11	prs1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664948	2539560	2541350	276121	277861	SPCC736.08	SPBP4H10.11c	cbf11	lcf2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664949	2539560	2542920	276121	279361	SPCC736.08	SPAC10F6.01c	cbf11	sir1	-	SPAC4C5.05c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664950	2539560	2542252	276121	278722	SPCC736.08	SPAC17A2.13c	cbf11	rad25	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664951	2539560	2543413	276121	279835	SPCC736.08	SPAC4F8.12c	cbf11	spp42	-	cwf6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664952	2539560	2540046	276121	276584	SPCC736.08	SPBC1773.10c	cbf11	nrs1	-	ded81	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664953	2539560	2541062	276121	277577	SPCC736.08	SPBC660.11	cbf11	tcg1	-	mug187	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664954	2539560	2540180	276121	276713	SPCC736.08	SPBC16D10.11c	cbf11	rps1801	-	rps18-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664955	2539560	2539588	276121	276146	SPCC736.08	SPCC962.04	cbf11	rps1201	-	rps12|rps12-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664956	2539560	2539180	276121	275751	SPCC736.08	SPCC16C4.09	cbf11	sts5	-	orb4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664957	2539560	2542744	276121	279194	SPCC736.08	SPAC1565.08	cbf11	cdc48	-	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664958	2539560	2542298	276121	278765	SPCC736.08	SPAC29A4.02c	cbf11	SPAC29A4.02c	-	tef3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664959	2539560	2543647	276121	280061	SPCC736.08	SPAC3G9.06	cbf11	frs2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664960	2539560	2541768	276121	278262	SPCC736.08	SPAC11G7.04	cbf11	ubi1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664961	2539560	2542138	276121	278614	SPCC736.08	SPAC589.10c	cbf11	SPAC589.10c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664962	2539560	2542870	276121	279315	SPCC736.08	SPAC13G6.07c	cbf11	rps601	-	rps6-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664963	2539560	2542904	276121	279348	SPCC736.08	SPAC144.11	cbf11	rps1102	-	rps11|rps11-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664964	2539560	2543120	276121	279552	SPCC736.08	SPAC31G5.03	cbf11	rps1101	-	rps11-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664965	2539560	2542619	276121	279073	SPCC736.08	SPAC6G10.02c	cbf11	tea3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664966	2539560	2542235	276121	278707	SPCC736.08	SPAC18G6.05c	cbf11	SPAC18G6.05c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664967	2539560	5802955	276121	858093	SPCC736.08	SPAC25G10.09c	cbf11	pan1	-	SPAC27F1.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664968	2539560	2540899	276121	277415	SPCC736.08	SPBC4F6.18c	cbf11	arf1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664969	2539560	2543337	276121	279760	SPCC736.08	SPAC959.08	cbf11	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pancaldi V (2012)	22540037	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	file S4.	-	BIOGRID
664970	2542358	2542632	278823	279086	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC24H6.05	clp1	cdc25	flp1	sal2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lu LX (2012)	22665807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression	overexpression of cdc25 causes abnormalities in cell cycle progression in a clp1 mutant background	-	BIOGRID
664971	2539094	2541704	275666	278199	SPCC330.02	SPAC1250.04c	rhp7	atl1	SPCC613.14	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Latypov VF (2012)	22658721	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to MNNG (CHEBI 21759 CID 9562060)	-	BIOGRID
664972	2541120	2541704	277635	278199	SPBC649.03	SPAC1250.04c	rhp14	atl1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Latypov VF (2012)	22658721	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to MNNG (CHEBI 21759 CID 9562060)	-	BIOGRID
664973	2539094	2539473	275666	276036	SPCC330.02	SPCP25A2.02c	rhp7	rhp26	SPCC613.14	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Latypov VF (2012)	22658721	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to MNNG (CHEBI 21759 CID 9562060)	-	BIOGRID
664974	2540887	2541704	277404	278199	SPBC4F6.15c	SPAC1250.04c	swi10	atl1	rad23	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Latypov VF (2012)	22658721	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to MNNG (CHEBI 21759 CID 9562060)	-	BIOGRID
664975	2542740	2541699	279190	278195	SPAC9G1.06c	SPAP8A3.08	cyk3	cdc4	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pollard LW (2012)	22573890	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	cdc4-8	-	BIOGRID
664976	2542740	2541699	279190	278195	SPAC9G1.06c	SPAP8A3.08	cyk3	cdc4	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Pollard LW (2012)	22573890	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis|septum formation	cyk3 cdc4-8 has enhanced cytokinesis defects|cyk3 cdc4-8 has exacerbated septum morphology defects	-	BIOGRID
664977	2542740	2539513	279190	276075	SPAC9G1.06c	SPCC645.05c	cyk3	myo2	-	rng5	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Pollard LW (2012)	22573890	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis|septum formation	cyk3 myo2-E1 has enhanced cytokinesis defects|cyk3 myo2-E1 has exacerbated septum morphology defects	-	BIOGRID
664978	2541635	2541704	278131	278199	SPAC1556.01c	SPAC1250.04c	rad50	atl1	SPAP4C9.01c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Latypov VF (2012)	22658721	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to BNNG (CID 9570281), MNNG (CHEBI 21759 CID 9562060) and BzNU (CID 96326)	-	BIOGRID
664979	2540481	2541704	277009	278199	SPBC2D10.12	SPAC1250.04c	rhp23	atl1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Latypov VF (2012)	22658721	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of atl1 decreases sensitivity to BNNG (CID 9570281) and BzNU (CID 96326)	-	BIOGRID
664980	2541120	2541704	277635	278199	SPBC649.03	SPAC1250.04c	rhp14	atl1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Latypov VF (2012)	22658721	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of atl1 decreases sensitivity to BNNG (CID 9570281) and BzNU (CID 96326)	-	BIOGRID
664981	2539473	2541704	276036	278199	SPCP25A2.02c	SPAC1250.04c	rhp26	atl1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Latypov VF (2012)	22658721	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of atl1 decreases sensitivity to BNNG (CID 9570281) and BzNU (CID 96326)	-	BIOGRID
664982	2540887	2541704	277404	278199	SPBC4F6.15c	SPAC1250.04c	swi10	atl1	rad23	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Latypov VF (2012)	22658721	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of atl1 decreases sensitivity to BNNG (CID 9570281) and BzNU (CID 96326)	-	BIOGRID
664983	2542740	2540176	279190	276709	SPAC9G1.06c	SPBC1709.01	cyk3	chs2	-	SPBC1734.17	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Pollard LW (2012)	22573890	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis:wild type	chs2 deletion suppressed cytokinesis defects of cyk3 mutant	-	BIOGRID
664984	2542740	2541603	279190	278100	SPAC9G1.06c	SPAC1F5.04c	cyk3	cdc12	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Pollard LW (2012)	22573890	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis	cyk3 cdc12-112 has enhanced cytokinesis defects	-	BIOGRID
664985	2542740	2541975	279190	278460	SPAC9G1.06c	SPAC20G8.05c	cyk3	cdc15	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Pollard LW (2012)	22573890	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis	cyk3 cdc15-127 has enhanced cytokinesis defects	-	BIOGRID
664986	2538959	2540148	275533	276685	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC16D10.04c	cds1	dna2	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Hu J (2012)	22682245	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
664987	2538959	2540148	275533	276685	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC16D10.04c	cds1	dna2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Hu J (2012)	22682245	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	dna2S220D mutants rescue HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423) sensitivity in a cds1 null mutant	-	BIOGRID
664988	3361384	2541633	280460	278129	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC664.01c	cid14	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Keller C (2012)	22683269	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	cid14 swi6 double mutant has decreased H3K9me2 at nat3M::gfp+ locus via ChIP	-	BIOGRID
664989	2542632	2539087	279086	275659	SPAC24H6.05	SPCC1259.13	cdc25	chk1	sal2	rad27	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yasuhira S (2012)	22682874	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in G2 phase:undetermined	deletion of chk1 or rad3 inhibits the cell cycle arrest in a cdc25 mutant after irradiation	-	BIOGRID
664990	2542632	2540719	279086	277242	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC216.05	cdc25	rad3	sal2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yasuhira S (2012)	22682874	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in G2 phase:undetermined	deletion of chk1 or rad3 inhibits the cell cycle arrest in a cdc25 mutant after irradiation	-	BIOGRID
664991	2542632	2539087	279086	275659	SPAC24H6.05	SPCC1259.13	cdc25	chk1	sal2	rad27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yasuhira S (2012)	22682874	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance|gamma ray resistance	combination of cdc25 mutation with chk1/cds1 mutants show decreased survival and chromatid cohesion and repair in response to irradiation|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
664992	2542632	2540719	279086	277242	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC216.05	cdc25	rad3	sal2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yasuhira S (2012)	22682874	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance|gamma ray resistance	double mutants show decreased survival and chromatid cohesion and repair in response to irradiation	-	BIOGRID
664993	2542632	2538959	279086	275533	SPAC24H6.05	SPCC18B5.11c	cdc25	cds1	sal2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yasuhira S (2012)	22682874	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance|gamma ray resistance	combination of cdc25 mutation with chk1/cds1 mutants show decreased survival and chromatid cohesion and repair in response to irradiation|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
664994	2541319	2541158	277831	277673	SPBP4H10.06c	SPBC660.13c	cut14	ssb1	smc2	rad11|rpa1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Akai Y (2011)	22645654	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	ssb1-418 mutation rescues growth defect of cut14-Y1 at 30 degrees, and on hydroxyurea and UV	-	BIOGRID
664995	2541319	2540255	277831	276786	SPBP4H10.06c	SPBC336.04	cut14	cdc6	smc2	mis10|pol3|pold	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Akai Y (2011)	22645654	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	cut14-Y1, no viable double mutant through tetrad dissections	-	BIOGRID
664996	2541319	2541695	277831	278191	SPBP4H10.06c	SPAC1F7.05	cut14	cdc22	smc2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Akai Y (2011)	22645654	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	cut14-Y1, no viable double mutant through tetrad dissections	-	BIOGRID
664997	2541319	2541051	277831	277566	SPBP4H10.06c	SPBC3E7.08c	cut14	rad13	smc2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Akai Y (2011)	22645654	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	cut14-Y1, no viable double mutant through tetrad dissections	-	BIOGRID
664998	2541319	2542029	277831	278511	SPBP4H10.06c	SPAC8E11.02c	cut14	rad24	smc2	anr5|sam4	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Akai Y (2011)	22645654	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	cut14-Y1, no viable double mutant through tetrad dissections	-	BIOGRID
664999	2541319	2542252	277831	278722	SPBP4H10.06c	SPAC17A2.13c	cut14	rad25	smc2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Akai Y (2011)	22645654	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	cut14-Y1, no viable double mutant through tetrad dissections	-	BIOGRID
665000	2541319	2543289	277831	279714	SPBP4H10.06c	SPAC9E9.08	cut14	rad26	smc2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Akai Y (2011)	22645654	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	cut14-Y1, no viable double mutant through tetrad dissections	-	BIOGRID
665001	2541319	2541746	277831	278240	SPBP4H10.06c	SPAC20G4.04c	cut14	hus1	smc2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Akai Y (2011)	22645654	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	cut14-Y1, no viable double mutant through tetrad dissections	-	BIOGRID
665002	2541319	2543544	277831	279961	SPBP4H10.06c	SPAC664.07c	cut14	rad9	smc2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Akai Y (2011)	22645654	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	cut14-Y1, no viable double mutant through tetrad dissections	-	BIOGRID
665003	2541319	2541643	277831	278139	SPBP4H10.06c	SPAC14C4.13	cut14	rad17	smc2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Akai Y (2011)	22645654	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	cut14-Y1, no viable double mutant through tetrad dissections	-	BIOGRID
665004	2541319	2543580	277831	279995	SPBP4H10.06c	SPAC644.14c	cut14	rad51	smc2	rhp51	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Akai Y (2011)	22645654	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	cut14-Y1, no viable double mutant through tetrad dissections	-	BIOGRID
665005	2541319	2543086	277831	279519	SPBP4H10.06c	SPAC30D11.10	cut14	rad52	smc2	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Akai Y (2011)	22645654	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	cut14-Y1, no viable double mutant through tetrad dissections	-	BIOGRID
665006	2541319	2539090	277831	275662	SPBP4H10.06c	SPCC126.02c	cut14	pku70	smc2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Akai Y (2011)	22645654	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	cut14-Y1, no viable double mutant through tetrad dissections	-	BIOGRID
665007	2541319	2541107	277831	277622	SPBP4H10.06c	SPBC646.14c	cut14	orc5	smc2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Akai Y (2011)	22645654	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	cut14-Y1, no viable double mutant through tetrad dissections	-	BIOGRID
665008	2541319	2539004	277831	275578	SPBP4H10.06c	SPCC4G3.05c	cut14	mus81	smc2	slx3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Akai Y (2011)	22645654	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	cut14-Y1, no viable double mutant through tetrad dissections	-	BIOGRID
665009	2541319	2540719	277831	277242	SPBP4H10.06c	SPBC216.05	cut14	rad3	smc2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Akai Y (2011)	22645654	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutant with cut14-Y1 shows temperature-sensitivity, growth defect on hydroxyurea and UV	-	BIOGRID
665010	2541319	2539087	277831	275659	SPBP4H10.06c	SPCC1259.13	cut14	chk1	smc2	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Akai Y (2011)	22645654	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutant with cut14-Y1 shows temperature-sensitivity, growth defect on hydroxyurea and UV	-	BIOGRID
665011	2541319	2538959	277831	275533	SPBP4H10.06c	SPCC18B5.11c	cut14	cds1	smc2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Akai Y (2011)	22645654	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutant with cut14-Y1 shows temperature-sensitivity, growth defect on hydroxyurea and UV	-	BIOGRID
665012	2541319	2540992	277831	277508	SPBP4H10.06c	SPBC342.05	cut14	crb2	smc2	rhp9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Akai Y (2011)	22645654	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutant with cut14-Y1 shows temperature-sensitivity, growth defect on hydroxyurea and UV	-	BIOGRID
665013	2541319	2540728	277831	277251	SPBP4H10.06c	SPBC216.06c	cut14	swi1	smc2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Akai Y (2011)	22645654	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutant with cut14-Y1 shows temperature-sensitivity, growth defect on hydroxyurea and UV	-	BIOGRID
665014	2542237	2542237	278709	278709	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC19E9.02	fin1	fin1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Grallert A (2012)	22684255	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665015	2541599	2542237	278096	278709	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC19E9.02	sid2	fin1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Grallert A (2012)	22684255	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665109	2540660	2540072	277185	276610	SPBC21.06c	SPBC16H5.07c	cdc7	ppa2	its10|pld1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Goyal A (2012)	22267499	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	ppa2 mutant rescues cold sensitivity of cdc7-24	-	BIOGRID
665111	2542761	2542349	279211	278814	SPAC1565.06c	SPAC1782.05	spg1	ypa2	sid3	SPAC1782.05|pta2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Goyal A (2012)	22267499	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
665112	2540624	2542349	277150	278814	SPBC24C6.07	SPAC1782.05	cdc14	ypa2	-	SPAC1782.05|pta2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Goyal A (2012)	22267499	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
665113	2540660	2542349	277185	278814	SPBC21.06c	SPAC1782.05	cdc7	ypa2	its10|pld1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Goyal A (2012)	22267499	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
665114	2539149	2542349	275721	278814	SPCC1739.11c	SPAC1782.05	cdc11	ypa2	-	SPAC1782.05|pta2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Goyal A (2012)	22267499	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
665115	2541957	2542349	278444	278814	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC1782.05	plo1	ypa2	-	SPAC1782.05|pta2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Goyal A (2012)	22267499	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
665116	2541599	2542349	278096	278814	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC1782.05	sid2	ypa2	-	SPAC1782.05|pta2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Goyal A (2012)	22267499	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
665117	2540845	2542349	277362	278814	SPBC428.13c	SPAC1782.05	mob1	ypa2	-	SPAC1782.05|pta2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Goyal A (2012)	22267499	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
665118	2543001	2542349	279439	278814	SPAC1006.08	SPAC1782.05	etd1	ypa2	-	SPAC1782.05|pta2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Goyal A (2012)	22267499	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
665119	2542162	2542349	278638	278814	SPAC6F6.08c	SPAC1782.05	cdc16	ypa2	bub2	SPAC1782.05|pta2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Goyal A (2012)	22267499	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
665120	2540845	2540072	277362	276610	SPBC428.13c	SPBC16H5.07c	mob1	ppa2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Goyal A (2012)	22267499	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
665121	2543001	2540072	279439	276610	SPAC1006.08	SPBC16H5.07c	etd1	ppa2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Goyal A (2012)	22267499	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
665122	2539149	2540072	275721	276610	SPCC1739.11c	SPBC16H5.07c	cdc11	ppa2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Goyal A (2012)	22267499	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
665123	2541957	2540072	278444	276610	SPAC23C11.16	SPBC16H5.07c	plo1	ppa2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Goyal A (2012)	22267499	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
665124	2542162	2540072	278638	276610	SPAC6F6.08c	SPBC16H5.07c	cdc16	ppa2	bub2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Goyal A (2012)	22267499	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
665125	2542349	2539379	278814	275945	SPAC1782.05	SPCC188.02	ypa2	par1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Goyal A (2012)	22267499	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
665126	2542349	2541519	278814	278020	SPAC1782.05	SPAC227.07c	ypa2	pab1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	ret1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Goyal A (2012)	22267499	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
665127	2540072	2539379	276610	275945	SPBC16H5.07c	SPCC188.02	ppa2	par1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Goyal A (2012)	22267499	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
665128	2540072	2541519	276610	278020	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC227.07c	ppa2	pab1	-	ret1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Goyal A (2012)	22267499	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
665129	2540660	2540072	277185	276610	SPBC21.06c	SPBC16H5.07c	cdc7	ppa2	its10|pld1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Goyal A (2012)	22267499	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution:wild type	rescue of cdc7-24 defect in Sid2-GFP localization	-	BIOGRID
665130	2540660	2542349	277185	278814	SPBC21.06c	SPAC1782.05	cdc7	ypa2	its10|pld1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Goyal A (2012)	22267499	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution:wild type	rescue of cdc7-24 defect in Sid2-GFP localization	-	BIOGRID
665131	2542632	2542035	279086	278517	SPAC24H6.05	SPAP8A3.04c	cdc25	hsp9	sal2	scf1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ahn J (2011)	22182414	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	hsp9 overexpression rescues growth of cdc25 mutant at 32 degrees	-	BIOGRID
665132	2542029	2542035	278511	278517	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAP8A3.04c	rad24	hsp9	anr5|sam4	scf1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ahn J (2011)	22182414	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	hsp9 overexpression rescues UV sensitivity of rad24	-	BIOGRID
665133	2542252	2542035	278722	278517	SPAC17A2.13c	SPAP8A3.04c	rad25	hsp9	-	scf1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ahn J (2011)	22182414	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	hsp9 overexpression rescues UV sensitivity of rad25	-	BIOGRID
665134	2542029	2542632	278511	279086	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC24H6.05	rad24	cdc25	anr5|sam4	sal2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ahn J (2011)	22182414	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665135	2542252	2542632	278722	279086	SPAC17A2.13c	SPAC24H6.05	rad25	cdc25	-	sal2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ahn J (2011)	22182414	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665136	2542035	2542632	278517	279086	SPAP8A3.04c	SPAC24H6.05	hsp9	cdc25	scf1	sal2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ahn J (2011)	22182414	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665137	2542035	2542029	278517	278511	SPAP8A3.04c	SPAC8E11.02c	hsp9	rad24	scf1	anr5|sam4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ahn J (2011)	22182414	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665138	2542035	2542252	278517	278722	SPAP8A3.04c	SPAC17A2.13c	hsp9	rad25	scf1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ahn J (2011)	22182414	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665139	2539970	2541013	276514	277528	SPBC1773.01	SPBC3H7.13	far8	far10	SPBC1773.01|csc3	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665140	2542162	2539970	278638	276514	SPAC6F6.08c	SPBC1773.01	cdc16	far8	bub2	SPBC1773.01|csc3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	cdc16-116	-	BIOGRID
665141	2542162	2540495	278638	277023	SPAC6F6.08c	SPBC27B12.04c	cdc16	far11	bub2	SPBC27B12.04c|csc2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	cdc16-116	-	BIOGRID
665142	2542162	2542650	278638	279104	SPAC6F6.08c	SPAC2C4.10c	cdc16	csc4	bub2	SPAC2C4.10c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	cdc16-116	-	BIOGRID
665143	2542162	2543042	278638	279477	SPAC6F6.08c	SPAP8A3.09c	cdc16	paa1	bub2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	cdc16-116	-	BIOGRID
665144	2540072	2541444	276610	277949	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC22H10.04	ppa2	ppa3	-	SPAC22H10.04|ppg1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	ppa2 ppa3 double mutants show modest increase in septated interphase cells	-	BIOGRID
665145	2539149	2541013	275721	277528	SPCC1739.11c	SPBC3H7.13	cdc11	far10	-	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	csc1 deletion reverses growth defect of cdc11-136 mutant at 36 degrees	-	BIOGRID
665146	2539149	2542650	275721	279104	SPCC1739.11c	SPAC2C4.10c	cdc11	csc4	-	SPAC2C4.10c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	csc4 deletion reverses growth defect of cdc11-136 mutant at 36 degrees	-	BIOGRID
665147	2539149	2541013	275721	277528	SPCC1739.11c	SPBC3H7.13	cdc11	far10	-	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:undetermined	csc1 deletion reduces number of cells with multiple nuclei seen in cdc11-136 mutant|csc1 deletion reverses septa defect appearance in cdc11-136 mutant	-	BIOGRID
665148	2539149	2542650	275721	279104	SPCC1739.11c	SPAC2C4.10c	cdc11	csc4	-	SPAC2C4.10c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:undetermined	csc4 deletion reduces number of cells with multiple nuclei seen in cdc11-136 mutant|csc4 deletion reverses septa defect appearance in cdc11-136 mutant	-	BIOGRID
665149	2541013	2540495	277528	277023	SPBC3H7.13	SPBC27B12.04c	far10	far11	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	SPBC27B12.04c|csc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665150	2541013	2539970	277528	276514	SPBC3H7.13	SPBC1773.01	far10	far8	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665151	2541013	2543042	277528	279477	SPBC3H7.13	SPAP8A3.09c	far10	paa1	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665152	2541013	2542650	277528	279104	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC2C4.10c	far10	csc4	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	SPAC2C4.10c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665153	2539970	2541013	276514	277528	SPBC1773.01	SPBC3H7.13	far8	far10	SPBC1773.01|csc3	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665154	2539970	2540495	276514	277023	SPBC1773.01	SPBC27B12.04c	far8	far11	SPBC1773.01|csc3	SPBC27B12.04c|csc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665155	2539970	2543585	276514	280000	SPBC1773.01	SPAC9.09	far8	met26	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665156	2539970	2541649	276514	278145	SPBC1773.01	SPAC1F3.06c	far8	spo15	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665157	2539970	2542976	276514	279414	SPBC1773.01	SPAC9E9.09c	far8	atd1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	SPAC9E9.09c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665158	2539970	2540767	276514	277287	SPBC1773.01	SPBC19C2.07	far8	fba1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665159	2539970	2541146	276514	277661	SPBC1773.01	SPBC660.16	far8	SPBC660.16	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665160	2539970	2540626	276514	277152	SPBC1773.01	SPBC21C3.08c	far8	car2	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665161	2539970	2540269	276514	276800	SPBC1773.01	SPBC28F2.03	far8	ppi1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	cyp2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665162	2539970	2542078	276514	278555	SPBC1773.01	SPAC26A3.05	far8	chc1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665163	2539970	3361514	276514	280590	SPBC1773.01	SPAC110.04c	far8	pss1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	SPAP14E8.01c|ssp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665164	2539970	2542650	276514	279104	SPBC1773.01	SPAC2C4.10c	far8	csc4	SPBC1773.01|csc3	SPAC2C4.10c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665165	2539970	2541927	276514	278415	SPBC1773.01	SPAC222.12c	far8	atp2	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665166	2539970	2540441	276514	276969	SPBC1773.01	SPBC2G5.05	far8	SPBC2G5.05	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665167	2539970	2539093	276514	275665	SPBC1773.01	SPCC736.15	far8	pil1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	SPCC736.15	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665168	2539970	2540210	276514	276743	SPBC1773.01	SPBC9B6.04c	far8	tuf1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665169	2539970	2539569	276514	276129	SPBC1773.01	SPCPB16A4.03c	far8	ade10	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665170	2539970	2540232	276514	276764	SPBC1773.01	SPBC336.10c	far8	tif512	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665171	2539970	2541060	276514	277575	SPBC1773.01	SPBC56F2.09c	far8	arg5	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665172	2539970	2539863	276514	276410	SPBC1773.01	SPBC14F5.03c	far8	kap123	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665173	2539970	2541218	276514	277732	SPBC1773.01	SPBC8D2.18c	far8	SPBC8D2.18c	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665174	2539970	2540567	276514	277094	SPBC1773.01	SPBC1A4.08c	far8	cct3	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665175	2539970	2538729	276514	275313	SPBC1773.01	SPCC24B10.21	far8	tpi1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	tpi	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665176	2539970	2543662	276514	280076	SPBC1773.01	SPAC9.07c	far8	SPAC9.07c	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665177	2539970	2543042	276514	279477	SPBC1773.01	SPAP8A3.09c	far8	paa1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665178	2539970	2540455	276514	276983	SPBC1773.01	SPBC215.05	far8	gpd1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665179	2539970	2540213	276514	276746	SPBC1773.01	SPBC17D1.06	far8	dbp3	SPBC1773.01|csc3	SPCC17D1.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665180	2539970	2539592	276514	276150	SPBC1773.01	SPCC794.12c	far8	mae2	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665181	2539970	2539625	276514	276182	SPBC1773.01	SPBC1604.05	far8	pgi1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665182	2539970	2542948	276514	279388	SPBC1773.01	SPAC1006.07	far8	SPAC1006.07	SPBC1773.01|csc3	tif1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665183	2539970	2542240	276514	278712	SPBC1773.01	SPAC19A8.15	far8	trp2	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665184	2539970	2539798	276514	276348	SPBC1773.01	SPBC146.14c	far8	sec26	SPBC1773.01|csc3	SPBC337.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665185	2539970	2541444	276514	277949	SPBC1773.01	SPAC22H10.04	far8	ppa3	SPBC1773.01|csc3	SPAC22H10.04|ppg1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665186	2539970	2538734	276514	275318	SPBC1773.01	SPCC1322.13	far8	ade6	SPBC1773.01|csc3	min1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665187	2539970	2542750	276514	279200	SPBC1773.01	SPAC1635.01	far8	SPAC1635.01	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665188	2539970	2538977	276514	275551	SPBC1773.01	SPCC1020.06c	far8	tal1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665189	2539970	2542475	276514	278935	SPBC1773.01	SPAC1F12.02c	far8	SPAC1F12.02c	SPBC1773.01|csc3	p23fy	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665190	2539970	2543082	276514	279515	SPBC1773.01	SPAC3C7.08c	far8	elf1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665191	2539970	2542597	276514	279051	SPBC1773.01	SPAP8A3.07c	far8	SPAP8A3.07c	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665192	2539970	2540616	276514	277142	SPBC1773.01	SPBC215.09c	far8	erg10	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665193	2539970	2543298	276514	279723	SPBC1773.01	SPAC6B12.15	far8	cpc2	SPBC1773.01|csc3	rkp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665194	2539970	2540831	276514	277349	SPBC1773.01	SPBC428.02c	far8	eca39	SPBC1773.01|csc3	SPBC582.12c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665195	2539970	3361462	276514	280538	SPBC1773.01	SPAC3A11.12c	far8	rpt5	SPBC1773.01|csc3	pam2|tbp1|SPAC3H5.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665196	2539970	2542163	276514	278639	SPBC1773.01	SPAC29A4.15	far8	SPAC29A4.15	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665197	2539970	2542115	276514	278591	SPBC1773.01	SPAC1834.02	far8	aro1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665198	2539970	2539434	276514	275997	SPBC1773.01	SPCC757.09c	far8	rnc1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665199	2539970	2542001	276514	278485	SPBC1773.01	SPAC20G8.06	far8	not1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665200	2539970	2541089	276514	277604	SPBC1773.01	SPBC646.09c	far8	int6	SPBC1773.01|csc3	yin6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665201	2539970	2539275	276514	275843	SPBC1773.01	SPCC1450.04	far8	tef5	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665202	2539970	2542031	276514	278513	SPBC1773.01	SPAC23C11.09	far8	ala1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	ars1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665203	2539970	2540582	276514	277108	SPBC1773.01	SPBC26H8.07c	far8	nda3	SPBC1773.01|csc3	alp12|ben1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665204	2539970	2539864	276514	276411	SPBC1773.01	SPBC16A3.15c	far8	nda2	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665205	2539970	2542011	276514	278494	SPBC1773.01	SPAC23C11.05	far8	ipp1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	SPAC23C11.05|ppa|ppa1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665206	2539970	2539474	276514	276037	SPBC1773.01	SPCC645.14c	far8	sti1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665207	2539970	2539652	276514	276207	SPBC1773.01	SPBC1703.13c	far8	SPBC1703.13c	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665208	2539970	2540201	276514	276734	SPBC1773.01	SPBC13A2.04c	far8	ptr2	SPBC1773.01|csc3	SPBC13A2.04c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665209	2539970	2539387	276514	275952	SPBC1773.01	SPCC1840.03	far8	sal3	SPBC1773.01|csc3	pse1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665210	2539970	2539572	276514	276132	SPBC1773.01	SPCC576.03c	far8	tpx1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665211	2539970	2541412	276514	277920	SPBC1773.01	SPBPJ4664.04	far8	SPBPJ4664.04	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665212	2539970	3361415	276514	280491	SPBC1773.01	SPAC21E11.08	far8	lcb2	SPBC1773.01|csc3	SPAC2C4.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665213	2539970	2540913	276514	277429	SPBC1773.01	SPBC56F2.08c	far8	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665214	2539970	2540806	276514	277325	SPBC1773.01	SPBC18E5.06	far8	rps21	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665215	2539970	2540705	276514	277228	SPBC1773.01	SPBC20F10.01	far8	gar1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	SPBC25H2.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665216	2539970	2542212	276514	278686	SPBC1773.01	SPAC1D4.04	far8	cct2	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665217	2539970	2541258	276514	277772	SPBC1773.01	SPBC8E4.01c	far8	SPBC8E4.01c	SPBC1773.01|csc3	SPBP4G3.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665218	2539970	2540729	276514	277252	SPBC1773.01	SPBC215.08c	far8	arg4	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665219	2539970	2539784	276514	276334	SPBC1773.01	SPBC1703.10	far8	ypt1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665220	2539970	2540936	276514	277452	SPBC1773.01	SPBC800.05c	far8	atb2	SPBC1773.01|csc3	alp2|ban5|tub1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665221	2539970	2539490	276514	276053	SPBC1773.01	SPCC364.07	far8	ser3	SPBC1773.01|csc3	SPCC364.07|SPCC4G3.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665222	2539970	2543009	276514	279447	SPBC1773.01	SPAC10F6.06	far8	vip1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665223	2539970	2541148	276514	277663	SPBC1773.01	SPBC776.03	far8	SPBC776.03	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665224	2539970	2540305	276514	276835	SPBC1773.01	SPBC337.05c	far8	cct8	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665225	2539970	2543607	276514	280022	SPBC1773.01	SPAC4F8.07c	far8	hxk2	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665226	2539970	2538788	276514	275369	SPBC1773.01	SPCC1322.14c	far8	vtc4	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665227	2539970	2541975	276514	278460	SPBC1773.01	SPAC20G8.05c	far8	cdc15	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665228	2539970	2542520	276514	278978	SPBC1773.01	SPAC20G8.09c	far8	nat10	SPBC1773.01|csc3	SPAC20G8.09c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665229	2539970	2540633	276514	277159	SPBC1773.01	SPBC21D10.12	far8	hob1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665230	2539970	2542269	276514	278738	SPBC1773.01	SPAC1F12.07	far8	SPAC1F12.07	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665231	2539970	2543280	276514	279707	SPBC1773.01	SPAC9E9.07c	far8	ypt2	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665232	2539970	2541038	276514	277553	SPBC1773.01	SPBC29A10.01	far8	ccr1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	SPBC365.17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665233	2539970	2538726	276514	275310	SPBC1773.01	SPCC777.09c	far8	arg1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665234	2539970	3361407	276514	280483	SPBC1773.01	SPAPB17E12.05	far8	rpl3703	SPBC1773.01|csc3	rpl37	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665235	2539970	2540960	276514	277476	SPBC1773.01	SPBC3D6.02	far8	but2	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665236	2539970	2541460	276514	277962	SPBC1773.01	SPAC1F5.02	far8	pdi1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	SPAC1F5.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665237	2539970	2543229	276514	279657	SPBC1773.01	SPAC56F8.05c	far8	mug64	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665238	2539970	2539488	276514	276051	SPBC1773.01	SPCC645.08c	far8	snd1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665239	2539970	2541245	276514	277759	SPBC1773.01	SPBC8D2.06	far8	irs1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665240	2539970	2540009	276514	276553	SPBC1773.01	SPBC16G5.05c	far8	scs2	SPBC1773.01|csc3	SPBC16G5.05c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665241	2539970	2542363	276514	278827	SPBC1773.01	SPAC1783.05	far8	hrp1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	chd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665242	2539970	2539463	276514	276026	SPBC1773.01	SPCC550.11	far8	SPCC550.11	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665243	2539970	2542634	276514	279088	SPBC1773.01	SPAC24H6.04	far8	hxk1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665244	2539970	2539975	276514	276519	SPBC1773.01	SPBC12C2.06	far8	dbp5	SPBC1773.01|csc3	SPBC12C2.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665245	2539970	2542155	276514	278631	SPBC1773.01	SPAC17G8.06c	far8	SPAC17G8.06c	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665246	2539970	2540053	276514	276591	SPBC1773.01	SPBC106.06	far8	cct4	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665247	2539970	2541434	276514	277939	SPBC1773.01	SPAC27E2.03c	far8	SPAC27E2.03c	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665248	2539970	2543325	276514	279748	SPBC1773.01	SPAC977.14c	far8	SPAC977.14c	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665249	2539970	2541651	276514	278147	SPBC1773.01	SPAC25B8.12c	far8	SPAC25B8.12c	SPBC1773.01|csc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665250	2539970	2543591	276514	280006	SPBC1773.01	SPAC19B12.01	far8	SPAC19B12.01	SPBC1773.01|csc3	SPAC4F10.21	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665251	2543042	2539379	279477	275945	SPAP8A3.09c	SPCC188.02	paa1	par1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665252	2543042	2540072	279477	276610	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC16H5.07c	paa1	ppa2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665253	2543042	2542052	279477	278531	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC823.15	paa1	ppa1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665254	2543042	2541519	279477	278020	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC227.07c	paa1	pab1	-	ret1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665255	2543042	2543585	279477	280000	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC9.09	paa1	met26	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665256	2543042	2540965	279477	277481	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC3D6.15	paa1	rps2501	-	rps25-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665257	2543042	2538977	279477	275551	SPAP8A3.09c	SPCC1020.06c	paa1	tal1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665258	2543042	2542349	279477	278814	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC1782.05	paa1	ypa2	-	SPAC1782.05|pta2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665259	2543042	2543190	279477	279619	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC31F12.01	paa1	zds1	-	SPAC637.14|mug88	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665260	2543042	2541811	279477	278302	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC22A12.16	paa1	SPAC22A12.16	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665261	2543042	2543041	279477	279476	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC3C7.11c	paa1	cnx1	-	cal1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665262	2543042	2539970	279477	276514	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC1773.01	paa1	far8	-	SPBC1773.01|csc3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665263	2543042	2542948	279477	279388	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC1006.07	paa1	SPAC1006.07	-	tif1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665264	2543042	2539879	279477	276425	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC1703.07	paa1	SPBC1703.07	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665265	2543042	2539474	279477	276037	SPAP8A3.09c	SPCC645.14c	paa1	sti1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665266	2543042	2540960	279477	277476	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC3D6.02	paa1	but2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665267	2543042	2539765	279477	276316	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC1778.06c	paa1	fim1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665268	2543042	2541636	279477	278132	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC27F1.07	paa1	ost1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665269	2543042	2539391	279477	275956	SPAP8A3.09c	SPCC1682.05c	paa1	srp68	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665270	2543042	2540767	279477	277287	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC19C2.07	paa1	fba1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665271	2543042	2542163	279477	278639	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC29A4.15	paa1	SPAC29A4.15	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665272	2543042	2539520	279477	276082	SPAP8A3.09c	SPCC338.15	paa1	wbp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665273	2543042	2540455	279477	276983	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC215.05	paa1	gpd1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665274	2543042	2542269	279477	278738	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC1F12.07	paa1	SPAC1F12.07	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665275	2543042	3361407	279477	280483	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAPB17E12.05	paa1	rpl3703	-	rpl37	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665276	2543042	2542871	279477	279316	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC6F12.10c	paa1	ade3	-	min11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665277	2543042	2543634	279477	280048	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC3H8.04	paa1	SPAC3H8.04	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665278	2543042	2542891	279477	279335	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC6F12.12	paa1	par2	-	pbp2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665279	2543042	2542381	279477	278845	SPAP8A3.09c	SPACUNK4.07c	paa1	cta4	-	SPAPYUK71.01|sev4|SPAC2E11.07c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665280	2543042	2539975	279477	276519	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC12C2.06	paa1	dbp5	-	SPBC12C2.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665281	2543042	2541434	279477	277939	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC27E2.03c	paa1	SPAC27E2.03c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665282	2543042	2540191	279477	276724	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC17D11.07c	paa1	rpn2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665283	2543042	2539275	279477	275843	SPAP8A3.09c	SPCC1450.04	paa1	tef5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665284	2543042	2538888	279477	275466	SPAP8A3.09c	SPCC1322.16	paa1	phb2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665285	2543042	2540232	279477	276764	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC336.10c	paa1	tif512	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665286	2543042	2542031	279477	278513	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC23C11.09	paa1	ala1	-	ars1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665287	2543042	2541460	279477	277962	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC1F5.02	paa1	pdi1	-	SPAC1F5.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665288	2543042	2543291	279477	279716	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC9E9.04	paa1	SPAC9E9.04	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665289	2543042	2540959	279477	277475	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC365.12c	paa1	ish1	-	isp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665290	2543042	2542115	279477	278591	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC1834.02	paa1	aro1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665291	2543042	2539784	279477	276334	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC1703.10	paa1	ypt1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665292	2543042	2542883	279477	279328	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC1486.04c	paa1	alm1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665293	2543042	2540288	279477	276819	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC3B9.01	paa1	fes1	-	SPBC3B9.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665294	2543042	2542134	279477	278610	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC18G6.06	paa1	SPAC18G6.06	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665295	2543042	3361514	279477	280590	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC110.04c	paa1	pss1	-	SPAP14E8.01c|ssp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665296	2543042	2541579	279477	278076	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC26F1.03	paa1	pda1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665297	2543042	2541903	279477	278393	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC22F8.05	paa1	SPAC22F8.05	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665298	2543042	3361462	279477	280538	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC3A11.12c	paa1	rpt5	-	pam2|tbp1|SPAC3H5.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665299	2543042	2540273	279477	276804	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC30D10.13c	paa1	pdb1	-	agg1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665300	2543042	2542248	279477	278718	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC6F6.15	paa1	ypt5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665301	2543042	2543060	279477	279494	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC30C2.08	paa1	SPAC30C2.08	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665302	2543042	2538891	279477	275469	SPAP8A3.09c	SPCC1393.12	paa1	SPCC1393.12	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665303	2543042	2539488	279477	276051	SPAP8A3.09c	SPCC645.08c	paa1	snd1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665304	2543042	2541807	279477	278298	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC23G3.11	paa1	rpn6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665305	2543042	3361538	279477	280614	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC1705.03c	paa1	ecm33	-	SPAC23H4.19|SPAC1F2.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665306	2543042	2542976	279477	279414	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC9E9.09c	paa1	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665307	2543042	2542267	279477	278736	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAPYUK71.03c	paa1	syn1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665308	2543042	2540159	279477	276694	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC12C2.08	paa1	dnm1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665309	2543042	2542666	279477	279119	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC1142.04	paa1	SPAC1142.04	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665310	2543042	2542164	279477	278640	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC1786.02	paa1	SPAC1786.02	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665311	2543042	2540634	279477	277160	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC3F6.02c	paa1	SPBC3F6.02c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665312	2543042	2543009	279477	279447	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC10F6.06	paa1	vip1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665313	2543042	2540109	279477	276646	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC119.01	paa1	rpn3	-	SPBPJ4664.07	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665314	2543042	2542594	279477	279048	SPAP8A3.09c	SPACUNK4.10	paa1	SPACUNK4.10	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665315	2543042	2541723	279477	278217	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC22H12.01c	paa1	mug35	-	SPAC23G3.13c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665316	2543042	2540648	279477	277173	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC1921.05	paa1	ape2	-	ape1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665317	2543042	2540794	279477	277313	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC582.07c	paa1	rpn7	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665318	2543042	2541649	279477	278145	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC1F3.06c	paa1	spo15	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665319	2543042	2541146	279477	277661	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC660.16	paa1	SPBC660.16	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665320	2543042	2540626	279477	277152	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC21C3.08c	paa1	car2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665321	2543042	2542078	279477	278555	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC26A3.05	paa1	chc1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665322	2543042	2539863	279477	276410	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC14F5.03c	paa1	kap123	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665323	2543042	2538729	279477	275313	SPAP8A3.09c	SPCC24B10.21	paa1	tpi1	-	tpi	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665324	2543042	2540616	279477	277142	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC215.09c	paa1	erg10	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665325	2543042	3361415	279477	280491	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC21E11.08	paa1	lcb2	-	SPAC2C4.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665326	2543042	2543229	279477	279657	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC56F8.05c	paa1	mug64	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665327	2543042	2538829	279477	275410	SPAP8A3.09c	SPCC306.09c	paa1	cap1	-	cap	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665328	2543042	2543374	279477	279796	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAPB1A10.08	paa1	SPAPB1A10.08	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665329	2543042	2540977	279477	277493	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC3E7.02c	paa1	hsp16	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665330	2543042	2539015	279477	275588	SPAP8A3.09c	SPCC1183.02	paa1	SPCC1183.02	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665331	2543042	2539240	279477	275810	SPAP8A3.09c	SPCC1235.14	paa1	ght5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665332	2543042	2542240	279477	278712	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC19A8.15	paa1	trp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665333	2543042	2542475	279477	278935	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC1F12.02c	paa1	SPAC1F12.02c	-	p23fy	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665334	2543042	2540820	279477	277338	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC18E5.02c	paa1	SPBC18E5.02c	-	SPBC29A3.20c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665335	2543042	2542270	279477	278739	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC17H9.14c	paa1	pdi2	-	SPAC17H9.14c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665336	2543042	2541926	279477	278414	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC222.14c	paa1	SPAC222.14c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665337	2543042	2540948	279477	277464	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC365.13c	paa1	hba1	-	caf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665338	2543042	2542008	279477	278491	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC2G11.07c	paa1	ptc3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665339	2543042	2543595	279477	280010	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC4G9.11c	paa1	cmb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665340	2543042	2541371	279477	277882	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBP4H10.17c	paa1	SPBP4H10.17c	-	mrps2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665341	2543042	2542650	279477	279104	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC2C4.10c	paa1	csc4	-	SPAC2C4.10c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665342	2543042	2542467	279477	278928	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC1834.04	paa1	hht1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665343	2543042	2541418	279477	277924	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC22A12.07c	paa1	ogm1	-	oma1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665344	2543042	2543114	279477	279546	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC607.05	paa1	rpn9	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665345	2543042	2540495	279477	277023	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC27B12.04c	paa1	far11	-	SPBC27B12.04c|csc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665346	2543042	2542634	279477	279088	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC24H6.04	paa1	hxk1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665347	2543042	2540269	279477	276800	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC28F2.03	paa1	ppi1	-	cyp2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665348	2543042	2541089	279477	277604	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC646.09c	paa1	int6	-	yin6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665349	2543042	2539387	279477	275952	SPAP8A3.09c	SPCC1840.03	paa1	sal3	-	pse1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665350	2543042	2539572	279477	276132	SPAP8A3.09c	SPCC576.03c	paa1	tpx1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665351	2543042	2541412	279477	277920	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBPJ4664.04	paa1	SPBPJ4664.04	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665352	2543042	2541245	279477	277759	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC8D2.06	paa1	irs1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
665353	2540582	2540589	277108	277115	SPBC26H8.07c	SPBC20F10.06	nda3	mad2	alp12|ben1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Zheng L (2006)	16481403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis:wild type	deletion of mad2 allows cell division in an nda3 mutant	-	BIOGRID
665354	2540582	2539423	277108	275988	SPBC26H8.07c	SPCC663.12	nda3	cid12	alp12|ben1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Win TZ (2006)	16478992	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	double mutants show increased defects in sister centromere cohesion	-	BIOGRID
665355	2540580	3361384	277106	280460	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC12G12.13c	ran1	cid14	pat1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Win TZ (2006)	16478992	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:partial rescue	mutation of cid14 or dis3 allows meiosis to occur in a pat1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
665356	2540580	2540398	277106	276926	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC26H8.10	ran1	dis3	pat1	rrp44	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Win TZ (2006)	16478992	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:partial rescue	mutation of cid14 or dis3 allows meiosis to occur in a pat1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
666125	2542757	3361306	279207	280382	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC6B1.09c	mre11	nbs1	rad32	slr10	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Schiller CB (2012)	22705791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666126	2542757	3361306	279207	280382	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC6B1.09c	mre11	nbs1	rad32	slr10	Co-fractionation	physical	Schiller CB (2012)	22705791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666135	2542757	2542757	279207	279207	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC13C5.07	mre11	mre11	rad32	rad32	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Schiller CB (2012)	22705791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666231	2543058	2540109	279492	276646	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC119.01	rpn15	rpn3	dss1|sem1	SPBPJ4664.07	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wei SJ (2008)	18775730	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666288	2539155	3361402	275727	280478	SPCC1020.02	SPAPB17E12.06	spc7	sos7	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Jakopec V (2012)	22711988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
666290	3361402	2539155	280478	275727	SPAPB17E12.06	SPCC1020.02	sos7	spc7	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Jakopec V (2012)	22711988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
666291	3361402	2539155	280478	275727	SPAPB17E12.06	SPCC1020.02	sos7	spc7	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Jakopec V (2012)	22711988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity|vegetative growth	addition of a GFP tag to spc7 inhibits growth in an spc7-delta7 mutant	-	BIOGRID
666292	3361402	2539155	280478	275727	SPAPB17E12.06	SPCC1020.02	sos7	spc7	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jakopec V (2012)	22711988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666295	2539155	3361402	275727	280478	SPCC1020.02	SPAPB17E12.06	spc7	sos7	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jakopec V (2012)	22711988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666296	3361402	3361402	280478	280478	SPAPB17E12.06	SPAPB17E12.06	sos7	sos7	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jakopec V (2012)	22711988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666297	3361402	3361402	280478	280478	SPAPB17E12.06	SPAPB17E12.06	sos7	sos7	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Jakopec V (2012)	22711988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666301	3361402	2539155	280478	275727	SPAPB17E12.06	SPCC1020.02	sos7	spc7	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Jakopec V (2012)	22711988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666304	2539155	3361402	275727	280478	SPCC1020.02	SPAPB17E12.06	spc7	sos7	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Jakopec V (2012)	22711988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666305	3361402	2540494	280478	277022	SPAPB17E12.06	SPBC409.04c	sos7	mis12	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Jakopec V (2012)	22711988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
666306	3361402	2541047	280478	277562	SPAPB17E12.06	SPBC409.09c	sos7	mis13	-	cnl1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Jakopec V (2012)	22711988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
666312	2541347	2540627	277858	277153	SPBP8B7.14c	SPBC25H2.13c	dpb2	cdc20	-	pol2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Handa T (2012)	22718908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666313	2540627	2541347	277153	277858	SPBC25H2.13c	SPBP8B7.14c	cdc20	dpb2	pol2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Handa T (2012)	22718908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	fusion of dpb2 to cdc20-ct1 rescues growth at 31 degrees	-	BIOGRID
666314	2541194	2541368	277708	277879	SPBC725.13c	SPBP4H10.21c	psf2	sld5	bsh3|dre13	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Handa T (2012)	22718908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666315	2541194	2541324	277708	277836	SPBC725.13c	SPBP23A10.09	psf2	psf1	bsh3|dre13	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Handa T (2012)	22718908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666316	2541194	2541474	277708	277976	SPBC725.13c	SPAC227.16c	psf2	psf3	bsh3|dre13	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Handa T (2012)	22718908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666317	2541194	2543281	277708	279708	SPBC725.13c	SPAC23C4.18c	psf2	rad4	bsh3|dre13	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Handa T (2012)	22718908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666318	2541194	2542266	277708	278735	SPBC725.13c	SPAC17D4.02	psf2	cdc45	bsh3|dre13	goa1|sna41	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Handa T (2012)	22718908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666319	2541194	2540784	277708	277303	SPBC725.13c	SPBC211.04c	psf2	mcm6	bsh3|dre13	mis5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Handa T (2012)	22718908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666320	2541347	2541324	277858	277836	SPBP8B7.14c	SPBP23A10.09	dpb2	psf1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Handa T (2012)	22718908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666321	2541347	2543281	277858	279708	SPBP8B7.14c	SPAC23C4.18c	dpb2	rad4	-	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Handa T (2012)	22718908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666322	2541347	2542266	277858	278735	SPBP8B7.14c	SPAC17D4.02	dpb2	cdc45	-	goa1|sna41	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Handa T (2012)	22718908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666353	2539442	2541055	276005	277570	SPCC5E4.04	SPBC409.07c	cut1	wis1	ptr4	smf2|spc2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kawasaki Y (2006)	16861909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	wis1DD mutant rescues growth defect of cut1-693 at 33 degrees	-	BIOGRID
666354	2539442	2539781	276005	276331	SPCC5E4.04	SPBC106.10	cut1	pka1	ptr4	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kawasaki Y (2006)	16861909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	pka1 deletion rescues growth defect of cut1-693 and cut1-206 at 33 degrees	-	BIOGRID
666355	2539641	2539781	276196	276331	SPBC14C8.01c	SPBC106.10	cut2	pka1	SPBC1815.02c	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kawasaki Y (2006)	16861909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	pka1 deletion rescues growth defect of cut2-364 at 36 degrees	-	BIOGRID
666356	2540679	2538794	277204	275375	SPBC3D6.10	SPCC622.17	apn2	apn1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tanihigashi H (2006)	16857169	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	apn1 overexpression rescues growth defect of apn2 mutant on MMS	-	BIOGRID
666357	2543510	2538794	279928	275375	SPAC30D11.07	SPCC622.17	nth1	apn1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tanihigashi H (2006)	16857169	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:wild type	apn1 deletion slightly rescues growth defect of nth1 mutant on MMS|apn1 overexpression rescues growth defect of nth1 mutant on MMS	-	BIOGRID
666358	2543510	2540345	279928	276874	SPAC30D11.07	SPBC19C7.09c	nth1	uve1	-	uvde	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tanihigashi H (2006)	16857169	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	uve1 deletion slightly rescues growth defect of nth1 mutant on MMS	-	BIOGRID
666359	2542737	2542367	279187	278831	SPAC25B8.14	SPAC1783.03	mal2	fta2	-	sma2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kerres A (2006)	16855021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:partial rescue	fta2 overexpression suppresses mitotic defects in mal2-1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
666360	2542367	2540060	278831	276598	SPAC1783.03	SPBC106.01	fta2	mph1	sma2	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kerres A (2006)	16855021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	at 30 degrees	-	BIOGRID
666361	2542367	2540589	278831	277115	SPAC1783.03	SPBC20F10.06	fta2	mad2	sma2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kerres A (2006)	16855021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	at 30 degrees	-	BIOGRID
666378	2541590	2539123	278087	275695	SPAC57A10.02	SPCC18B5.03	cdr2	wee1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kanoh J (1998)	9843572	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:wild type|viability:wild type	genetic complex|mutation of wee1 rescues the lethality of a cdr2/cdc25 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
666379	2542632	2539123	279086	275695	SPAC24H6.05	SPCC18B5.03	cdc25	wee1	sal2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kanoh J (1998)	9843572	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:wild type|viability:wild type	genetic complex|mutation of wee1 rescues the lethality of a cdr2/cdc25 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
666380	2541590	2539123	278087	275695	SPAC57A10.02	SPCC18B5.03	cdr2	wee1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kanoh J (1998)	9843572	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:wild type	mutation of wee1 fully suppresses the cell elongation phenotype of cdr2	-	BIOGRID
666381	2542907	2543347	279351	279769	SPAC1420.03	SPAPB8E5.02c	rpn501	rpn502	rpn5|rpn5-a	rpn5|rpn5-b	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yen HC (2003)	12783882	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
666382	2542907	2543347	279351	279769	SPAC1420.03	SPAPB8E5.02c	rpn501	rpn502	rpn5|rpn5-a	rpn5|rpn5-b	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yen HC (2003)	12783882	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	double mutants show abnormal resistance to MBC	-	BIOGRID
666383	2542907	2543114	279351	279546	SPAC1420.03	SPAC607.05	rpn501	rpn9	rpn5|rpn5-a	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Yen HC (2003)	12783882	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666384	2543347	2543114	279769	279546	SPAPB8E5.02c	SPAC607.05	rpn502	rpn9	rpn5|rpn5-b	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Yen HC (2003)	12783882	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666385	2542907	2539862	279351	276409	SPAC1420.03	SPBC16C6.07c	rpn501	rpt1	rpn5|rpn5-a	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Yen HC (2003)	12783882	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666386	2543347	2539862	279769	276409	SPAPB8E5.02c	SPBC16C6.07c	rpn502	rpt1	rpn5|rpn5-b	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Yen HC (2003)	12783882	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666387	2542907	2543040	279351	279475	SPAC1420.03	SPAC31G5.13	rpn501	rpn11	rpn5|rpn5-a	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yen HC (2003)	12783882	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	rpn5/pad1 mutants are lethal	-	BIOGRID
666388	2543347	2543040	279769	279475	SPAPB8E5.02c	SPAC31G5.13	rpn502	rpn11	rpn5|rpn5-b	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yen HC (2003)	12783882	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	rpn5/pad1 mutants are lethal	-	BIOGRID
666389	2542907	2540025	279351	276569	SPAC1420.03	SPBC16G5.01	rpn501	rpn12	rpn5|rpn5-a	SPBC342.07|mts3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yen HC (2003)	12783882	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	rpn5/rpn12 mutants are lethal	-	BIOGRID
666390	2543347	2540025	279769	276569	SPAPB8E5.02c	SPBC16G5.01	rpn502	rpn12	rpn5|rpn5-b	SPBC342.07|mts3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yen HC (2003)	12783882	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	rpn5/rpn12 mutants are lethal	-	BIOGRID
666391	2542907	2540025	279351	276569	SPAC1420.03	SPBC16G5.01	rpn501	rpn12	rpn5|rpn5-a	SPBC342.07|mts3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yen HC (2003)	12783882	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of rpn12 partially rescues the cold sensitivity of a rpn5 mutant	-	BIOGRID
666392	2543347	2540025	279769	276569	SPAPB8E5.02c	SPBC16G5.01	rpn502	rpn12	rpn5|rpn5-b	SPBC342.07|mts3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yen HC (2003)	12783882	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of rpn12 partially rescues the cold sensitivity of a rpn5 mutant	-	BIOGRID
666393	2542907	2540939	279351	277455	SPAC1420.03	SPBC4.07c	rpn501	rpt2	rpn5|rpn5-a	mts2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yen HC (2003)	12783882	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of rpt2 partially rescues the cold sensitivity of a rpn5 mutant	-	BIOGRID
666394	2543347	2540939	279769	277455	SPAPB8E5.02c	SPBC4.07c	rpn502	rpt2	rpn5|rpn5-b	mts2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yen HC (2003)	12783882	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of rpt2 partially rescues the cold sensitivity of a rpn5 mutant	-	BIOGRID
666395	2543682	5718	280096	111690	SPAC637.10c	-	rpn10	PSMD12	pus1	Rpn5|p55	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yen HC (2003)	12783882	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666396	2543682	2543347	280096	279769	SPAC637.10c	SPAPB8E5.02c	rpn10	rpn502	pus1	rpn5|rpn5-b	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yen HC (2003)	12783882	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666397	2540470	2539087	276998	275659	SPBC29A10.15	SPCC1259.13	orc1	chk1	cdc30|orp1|rid1	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nitani N (2006)	16849602	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	on hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
666398	2542266	2539087	278735	275659	SPAC17D4.02	SPCC1259.13	cdc45	chk1	goa1|sna41	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nitani N (2006)	16849602	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	on hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
666399	2538959	2539087	275533	275659	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC1259.13	cds1	chk1	-	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nitani N (2006)	16849602	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	on hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
666400	2540470	2543240	276998	279668	SPBC29A10.15	SPAC694.06c	orc1	mrc1	cdc30|orp1|rid1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nitani N (2006)	16849602	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	on hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
666401	2538959	2540470	275533	276998	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC29A10.15	cds1	orc1	-	cdc30|orp1|rid1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nitani N (2006)	16849602	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	on hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
666402	2538959	2542266	275533	278735	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC17D4.02	cds1	cdc45	-	goa1|sna41	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nitani N (2006)	16849602	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	on hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
666403	2543240	2542266	279668	278735	SPAC694.06c	SPAC17D4.02	mrc1	cdc45	-	goa1|sna41	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nitani N (2006)	16849602	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	on hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
666404	2543240	2540620	279668	277146	SPAC694.06c	SPBC4.04c	mrc1	mcm2	-	cdc19|nda1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nitani N (2006)	16849602	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	on hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
666405	2538959	2540620	275533	277146	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC4.04c	cds1	mcm2	-	cdc19|nda1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nitani N (2006)	16849602	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	on hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
666406	2543240	2542477	279668	278937	SPAC694.06c	SPAC1B2.05	mrc1	mcm5	-	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nitani N (2006)	16849602	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	on hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
666407	2538959	2542477	275533	278937	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC1B2.05	cds1	mcm5	-	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nitani N (2006)	16849602	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	on hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
666408	2543281	2542844	279708	279290	SPAC23C4.18c	SPAC13G7.08c	rad4	crb3	cut5|dpb11|dre3	ipi3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Taricani L (2006)	16723501	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	crb3 expression suppresses camptothecin sensitivity of rad4-c11 mutant	-	BIOGRID
666449	2541055	2540329	277570	276859	SPBC409.07c	SPBC29B5.01	wis1	atf1	smf2|spc2	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Wang LY (2005)	15870269	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	deletion of atf1 represses the cation resistance of a wis1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
666450	2542804	2543048	279252	279483	SPAC29A4.16	SPAC3F10.02c	hal4	trk1	ppk10|sat4	sptrk	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wang LY (2005)	15870269	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	overexpression of Trk1 rescues Hal4 cells from cation toxicity	-	BIOGRID
666451	2541652	2542804	278148	279252	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC29A4.16	sty1	hal4	phh1|spc1	ppk10|sat4	Two-hybrid	physical	Wang LY (2005)	15870269	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666452	2541652	2541982	278148	278467	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC23A1.06c	sty1	cmk2	phh1|spc1	mkp2	Two-hybrid	physical	Wang LY (2005)	15870269	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666453	2541982	2541652	278467	278148	SPAC23A1.06c	SPAC24B11.06c	cmk2	sty1	mkp2	phh1|spc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang LY (2005)	15870269	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666454	2542162	2541936	278638	278423	SPAC6F6.08c	SPAC222.10c	cdc16	byr4	bub2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Furge KA (1998)	9742395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666456	2542761	2541936	279211	278423	SPAC1565.06c	SPAC222.10c	spg1	byr4	sid3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Furge KA (1998)	9742395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666458	2542761	2541936	279211	278423	SPAC1565.06c	SPAC222.10c	spg1	byr4	sid3	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Furge KA (1998)	9742395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666459	2542162	2541936	278638	278423	SPAC6F6.08c	SPAC222.10c	cdc16	byr4	bub2	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Furge KA (1998)	9742395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666460	2541936	2542761	278423	279211	SPAC222.10c	SPAC1565.06c	byr4	spg1	-	sid3	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Furge KA (1998)	9742395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666464	2541861	2540880	278351	277397	SPAC5D6.08c	SPBC582.03	mes1	cdc13	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Izawa D (2005)	15791259	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
666465	2541861	2543481	278351	279901	SPAC5D6.08c	SPAPB2B4.03	mes1	cig2	-	cyc17	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Izawa D (2005)	15791259	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
666474	2541861	2543222	278351	279650	SPAC5D6.08c	SPAC821.08c	mes1	slp1	-	cdc20	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Izawa D (2005)	15791259	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666475	2540880	2543222	277397	279650	SPBC582.03	SPAC821.08c	cdc13	slp1	-	cdc20	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Izawa D (2005)	15791259	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666476	2541861	2540043	278351	276581	SPAC5D6.08c	SPBC1198.12	mes1	mfr1	-	SPBC660.02|fzr1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Izawa D (2005)	15791259	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
666516	2539087	2543666	275659	280080	SPCC1259.13	SPAC644.06c	chk1	cdr1	rad27	nim1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Calonge TM (2006)	16816416	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	on MMS, UV	-	BIOGRID
666517	2543666	2539087	280080	275659	SPAC644.06c	SPCC1259.13	cdr1	chk1	nim1	rad27	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Calonge TM (2006)	16816416	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Chk1 overexpression causes growth defect in cdr1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
666526	2543666	2543666	280080	280080	SPAC644.06c	SPAC644.06c	cdr1	cdr1	nim1	nim1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Calonge TM (2006)	16816416	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	autophosphorylation	-	BIOGRID
666527	2539087	2543666	275659	280080	SPCC1259.13	SPAC644.06c	chk1	cdr1	rad27	nim1	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Calonge TM (2006)	16816416	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Cdr1 overexpression causes growth defect of chk1 mutant on MMS, UV	-	BIOGRID
666528	2539087	2539123	275659	275695	SPCC1259.13	SPCC18B5.03	chk1	wee1	rad27	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Calonge TM (2006)	16816416	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	Wee1 deletion rescues growth defect of cdr1 mutant overexpressing Chk1	-	BIOGRID
666529	2539087	2542029	275659	278511	SPCC1259.13	SPAC8E11.02c	chk1	rad24	rad27	anr5|sam4	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Calonge TM (2006)	16816416	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	Rad24 deletion rescues growth defect of cdr1 mutant overexpressing Chk1	-	BIOGRID
666530	2539087	2540719	275659	277242	SPCC1259.13	SPBC216.05	chk1	rad3	rad27	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Calonge TM (2006)	16816416	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	growth on MMS and UV, data not shown	-	BIOGRID
666531	2539087	2541643	275659	278139	SPCC1259.13	SPAC14C4.13	chk1	rad17	rad27	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Calonge TM (2006)	16816416	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	growth on MMS and UV, data not shown	-	BIOGRID
666532	2539087	2540992	275659	277508	SPCC1259.13	SPBC342.05	chk1	crb2	rad27	rhp9	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Calonge TM (2006)	16816416	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	growth on MMS and UV, data not shown	-	BIOGRID
666534	2543339	2540258	279762	276789	SPAC630.13c	SPBC32C12.02	tsc2	ste11	-	aff1|stex	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nakase Y (2006)	16624901	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	of tsc2 cpp1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
666535	2543339	2539873	279762	276419	SPAC630.13c	SPBC13G1.11	tsc2	ykt6	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nakase Y (2006)	16624901	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	of tsc2 cpp1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
666536	2543339	2539958	279762	276502	SPAC630.13c	SPBC1718.07c	tsc2	zfs1	-	moc4	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nakase Y (2006)	16624901	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	of tsc2 cpp1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
666537	2543339	2540933	279762	277449	SPAC630.13c	SPBC36.06c	tsc2	spo9	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nakase Y (2006)	16624901	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	of tsc2 cpp1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
666538	2543339	2543143	279762	279575	SPAC630.13c	SPAPB1A10.04c	tsc2	cwp1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nakase Y (2006)	16624901	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	of tsc2 cpp1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
666656	2540992	2539499	277508	276062	SPBC342.05	SPCC622.08c	crb2	hta1	rhp9	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Du LL (2006)	16778077	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue|gamma ray resistance:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
666657	2540992	2542226	277508	278699	SPBC342.05	SPAC19G12.06c	crb2	hta2	rhp9	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Du LL (2006)	16778077	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue|gamma ray resistance:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
666658	2540992	2539499	277508	276062	SPBC342.05	SPCC622.08c	crb2	hta1	rhp9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Du LL (2006)	16778077	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	on camptothecin	-	BIOGRID
666659	2540992	2542226	277508	278699	SPBC342.05	SPAC19G12.06c	crb2	hta2	rhp9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Du LL (2006)	16778077	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	on camptothecin	-	BIOGRID
666660	2539545	2540992	276106	277508	SPCC4B3.12	SPBC342.05	set9	crb2	-	rhp9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Du LL (2006)	16778077	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	UV, hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
666661	2539545	2543281	276106	279708	SPCC4B3.12	SPAC23C4.18c	set9	rad4	-	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Du LL (2006)	16778077	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution	set9 cut5-T401 double mutant has decreased Rad22 foci overlapping with Crb2 foci	-	BIOGRID
666662	2539545	2543281	276106	279708	SPCC4B3.12	SPAC23C4.18c	set9	rad4	-	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Du LL (2006)	16778077	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|gamma ray resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
666663	2540992	2543281	277508	279708	SPBC342.05	SPAC23C4.18c	crb2	rad4	rhp9	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Du LL (2006)	16778077	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|gamma ray resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
667247	2538875	3361036	275454	280112	SPCC962.02c	SPCC320.13c	bir1	ark1	SPCP31B10.10c|cut17|pbh1	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Leverson JD (2002)	11950927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	Ark1p alleviates the slow growth phenotype of bir1-46	-	BIOGRID
667248	3361036	2538875	280112	275454	SPCC320.13c	SPCC962.02c	ark1	bir1	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	SPCP31B10.10c|cut17|pbh1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Leverson JD (2002)	11950927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
667251	2540250	3361036	276782	280112	SPBC336.15	SPCC320.13c	pic1	ark1	SPBC685.01	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Leverson JD (2002)	11950927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	overexpression of ark1 rescues the growth defect caused by overexpression of pic1 fragments	-	BIOGRID
667256	2541101	2543444	277616	279864	SPBC609.02	SPAC458.05	ptn1	pik3	-	vps34	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mitra P (2004)	15249580	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chemical compound accumulation:wild type	deletion of vps34 greatly reduces levels of PI(3,4)P2 and PI(3,4,5)P3 in a ptn1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
667273	2542047	2542239	278528	278711	SPAC21E11.03c	SPAC18G6.02c	pcr1	chp1	mts2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noma K (2004)	15475954	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased defects in silencing, observed by expression of the Ura gene inhibiting growth in the presence of FOA	-	BIOGRID
667274	2542047	2540735	278528	277258	SPAC21E11.03c	SPBC83.03c	pcr1	tas3	mts2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noma K (2004)	15475954	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased defects in silencing, observed by expression of the Ura gene inhibiting growth in the presence of FOA	-	BIOGRID
667275	2542047	2538930	278528	275506	SPAC21E11.03c	SPCC188.13c	pcr1	dcr1	mts2	SPCC584.10c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noma K (2004)	15475954	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased defects in silencing, observed by expression of the Ura gene inhibiting growth in the presence of FOA	-	BIOGRID
667276	2538930	2541633	275506	278129	SPCC188.13c	SPAC664.01c	dcr1	swi6	SPCC584.10c	SPAC824.10c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Noma K (2004)	15475954	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution	double mutants show increased defects in RITS protein localization across the mat interval	-	BIOGRID
667277	2542914	2540025	279356	276569	SPAC57A10.05c	SPBC16G5.01	pof1	rpn12	-	SPBC342.07|mts3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Harrison C (2005)	15660136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
667533	2541030	2542707	277545	279160	SPBC337.08c	SPAC25G10.03	ubi4	zip1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Harrison C (2005)	15660136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
667534	2542914	2542707	279356	279160	SPAC57A10.05c	SPAC25G10.03	pof1	zip1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Harrison C (2005)	15660136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
667941	2538951	2539123	275525	275695	SPCC297.03	SPCC18B5.03	ssp1	wee1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Rupes I (1999)	10233158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression	data not shown|wee1 mutation rescues the cell cycle delay in a ssp1 mutant but not the sensitivity to stress	-	BIOGRID
667942	2543526	2538951	279944	275525	SPAC4A8.15c	SPCC297.03	cdc3	ssp1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Rupes I (1999)	10233158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology:partial rescue|protein/peptide distribution:partial rescue	ssp1 mutation cannot rescue lethality in cdc3 or cdc8 mutants, but does partially suppress actin localization defects in these mutants	-	BIOGRID
667943	2541940	2538951	278427	275525	SPAC27F1.02c	SPCC297.03	cdc8	ssp1	fus4	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Rupes I (1999)	10233158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology:partial rescue|protein/peptide distribution:partial rescue	ssp1 mutation cannot rescue lethality in cdc3 or cdc8 mutants, but does partially suppress actin localization defects in these mutants	-	BIOGRID
667944	2542293	2540737	278761	277260	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC19G7.05c	pck1	bgs1	SPAC22H10.01c	cps1|drc1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Arellano M (1999)	10504305	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	hypersensitivity to Echinocandin and Papulacandin B of P81nmt-pck1 cells grown with thiamine was suppressed by cps1+ and gls2+	-	BIOGRID
667945	2542293	2543277	278761	279705	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC1002.03c	pck1	gls2	SPAC22H10.01c	gls2alpha	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Arellano M (1999)	10504305	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	hypersensitivity to Echinocandin and Papulacandin B of P81nmt-pck1 cells grown with thiamine was suppressed by cps1+ and gls2+	-	BIOGRID
667946	2539649	2540737	276204	277260	SPBC12D12.04c	SPBC19G7.05c	pck2	bgs1	pkc1|sts6	cps1|drc1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Arellano M (1999)	10504305	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	hypersensitivity to Echinocandin and Papulacandin B of P81nmt-pck2 cells grown with thiamine was suppressed by cps1+ and gls2+	-	BIOGRID
667947	2539649	2543277	276204	279705	SPBC12D12.04c	SPAC1002.03c	pck2	gls2	pkc1|sts6	gls2alpha	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Arellano M (1999)	10504305	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	hypersensitivity to Echinocandin and Papulacandin B of P81nmt-pck2 cells grown with thiamine was suppressed by cps1+ and gls2+	-	BIOGRID
667948	2542293	2542285	278761	278753	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC17H9.09c	pck1	ras1	SPAC22H10.01c	ste5	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Arellano M (1999)	10504305	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	expression of ras1 or ral1 can rescue the Calcofluor sensitivity in a pck1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
667949	2542293	2542337	278761	278803	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC16E8.09	pck1	scd1	SPAC22H10.01c	ral1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Arellano M (1999)	10504305	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	expression of ras1 or ral1 can rescue the Calcofluor sensitivity in a pck1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
667950	2543058	2539082	279492	275654	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC126.03	rpn15	pus1	dss1|sem1	lps1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Josse L (2006)	16149916	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
667951	2543058	2541268	279492	277782	SPAC3G6.02	SPBP19A11.03c	rpn15	mts4	dss1|sem1	rpn1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Josse L (2006)	16149916	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
667952	2539082	2541268	275654	277782	SPCC126.03	SPBP19A11.03c	pus1	mts4	lps1	rpn1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Josse L (2006)	16149916	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
667953	2542140	2540329	278616	276859	SPAC1783.07c	SPBC29B5.01	pap1	atf1	caf3	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Rodriguez-Gabriel MA (2005)	16087744	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of atf1 increases resistance to arsenite in a pap1 mutant background	-	BIOGRID
667954	2542988	2542873	279426	279318	SPAC1006.09	SPAC9G1.02	win1	wis4	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	wak1|wik1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Rodriguez-Gabriel MA (2005)	16087744	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to hydrogen peroxide and decreased activation of spc1	-	BIOGRID
667955	2542988	2542677	279426	279130	SPAC1006.09	SPAC26F1.10c	win1	pyp1	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rodriguez-Gabriel MA (2005)	16087744	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	deletion of pyp1 contributes to the loss of spc1 activation in a win1/wis4 mutant background|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
667956	2542873	2542677	279318	279130	SPAC9G1.02	SPAC26F1.10c	wis4	pyp1	wak1|wik1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rodriguez-Gabriel MA (2005)	16087744	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	deletion of pyp1 contributes to the loss of spc1 activation in a win1/wis4 mutant background|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
667957	2543645	2540763	280059	277283	SPAC607.09c	SPBC405.04c	btn1	ypt7	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Gachet Y (2005)	16291725	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vacuolar morphology:wild type	overexpression of Ypt7p increased vacuole fusion and overrode the effect of deleting btn1	-	BIOGRID
668309	2539175	2543643	275746	280057	SPCC16C4.01	SPAC3G9.07c	sif2	hos2	SPCC5E4.09	hda1|phd1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Grewal C (2012)	22559741	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 4B.	-	BIOGRID
668310	2542358	2543643	278823	280057	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC3G9.07c	clp1	hos2	flp1	hda1|phd1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Grewal C (2012)	22559741	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis|resistance to chemicals	figure S3. clp1 hos2 double mutants display increased sensitivity to LatA.	-	BIOGRID
668311	2543643	2541975	280057	278460	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC20G8.05c	hos2	cdc15	hda1|phd1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Grewal C (2012)	22559741	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|viability	figure S4. the hos2 gene deletion reduces the restrictive temperature of the cdc15-140 mutation.	-	BIOGRID
668713	2540223	2542126	276756	278602	SPBC32F12.04	SPAC1B3.05	gtb1	not3	tug1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show reduced growth	-	BIOGRID
668714	2540589	2542126	277115	278602	SPBC20F10.06	SPAC1B3.05	mad2	not3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show reduced growth	-	BIOGRID
668715	2540223	2538778	276756	275359	SPBC32F12.04	SPCC4G3.15c	gtb1	not2	tug1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show reduced growth	-	BIOGRID
668716	2540589	2538778	277115	275359	SPBC20F10.06	SPCC4G3.15c	mad2	not2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show reduced growth	-	BIOGRID
668717	2540223	2542094	276756	278571	SPBC32F12.04	SPAC29B12.06c	gtb1	rcd1	tug1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show reduced growth	-	BIOGRID
668718	2540589	2542094	277115	278571	SPBC20F10.06	SPAC29B12.06c	mad2	rcd1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show reduced growth	-	BIOGRID
668719	2540223	2538913	276756	275490	SPBC32F12.04	SPCC31H12.08c	gtb1	ccr4	tug1	SPCC5E4.02c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show reduced growth	-	BIOGRID
668720	2540589	2538913	277115	275490	SPBC20F10.06	SPCC31H12.08c	mad2	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show reduced growth	-	BIOGRID
668721	2540223	2543515	276756	279933	SPBC32F12.04	SPAC4F10.14c	gtb1	btf3	tug1	btt1|egd1|nac2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show reduced growth	-	BIOGRID
668722	2540589	2543515	277115	279933	SPBC20F10.06	SPAC4F10.14c	mad2	btf3	-	btt1|egd1|nac2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show reduced growth	-	BIOGRID
668723	2540223	2541633	276756	278129	SPBC32F12.04	SPAC664.01c	gtb1	swi6	tug1	SPAC824.10c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show reduced growth	-	BIOGRID
668724	2540589	2541633	277115	278129	SPBC20F10.06	SPAC664.01c	mad2	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show reduced growth	-	BIOGRID
668725	2540223	2542358	276756	278823	SPBC32F12.04	SPAC1782.09c	gtb1	clp1	tug1	flp1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show reduced growth	-	BIOGRID
668726	2540589	2542358	277115	278823	SPBC20F10.06	SPAC1782.09c	mad2	clp1	-	flp1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show reduced growth	-	BIOGRID
668727	2540223	2542552	276756	279009	SPBC32F12.04	SPAC1B1.04c	gtb1	pan3	tug1	SPAC1B1.04c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show reduced growth	-	BIOGRID
668728	2540589	2542552	277115	279009	SPBC20F10.06	SPAC1B1.04c	mad2	pan3	-	SPAC1B1.04c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show reduced growth	-	BIOGRID
668729	2540223	2540231	276756	276763	SPBC32F12.04	SPBC336.14c	gtb1	ppk26	tug1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show reduced growth	-	BIOGRID
668730	2540589	2540231	277115	276763	SPBC20F10.06	SPBC336.14c	mad2	ppk26	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show reduced growth	-	BIOGRID
668731	2540223	2539041	276756	275614	SPBC32F12.04	SPCC18.06c	gtb1	caf1	tug1	pop2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show reduced growth	-	BIOGRID
668732	2540589	2539041	277115	275614	SPBC20F10.06	SPCC18.06c	mad2	caf1	-	pop2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show reduced growth	-	BIOGRID
668737	2541807	2539026	278298	275599	SPAC23G3.11	SPCC1442.06	rpn6	pre8	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Pathare GR (2012)	22187461	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
668738	2541807	2540487	278298	277015	SPAC23G3.11	SPBC23G7.12c	rpn6	rpt6	-	let1	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Pathare GR (2012)	22187461	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
668739	2540223	2543580	276756	279995	SPBC32F12.04	SPAC644.14c	gtb1	rad51	tug1	rhp51	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show reduced growth	-	BIOGRID
668740	2540589	2543580	277115	279995	SPBC20F10.06	SPAC644.14c	mad2	rad51	-	rhp51	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show reduced growth	-	BIOGRID
668741	2540223	2543685	276756	280099	SPBC32F12.04	SPAC3C7.03c	gtb1	rad55	tug1	rhp55	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show reduced growth	-	BIOGRID
668742	2540589	2543685	277115	280099	SPBC20F10.06	SPAC3C7.03c	mad2	rad55	-	rhp55	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show reduced growth	-	BIOGRID
668743	2540223	2542007	276756	278490	SPBC32F12.04	SPAC20H4.07	gtb1	rad57	tug1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show reduced growth	-	BIOGRID
668744	2540589	2542007	277115	278490	SPBC20F10.06	SPAC20H4.07	mad2	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show reduced growth	-	BIOGRID
668745	2540223	2543670	276756	280084	SPBC32F12.04	SPAPB1E7.06c	gtb1	eme1	tug1	mms4|slx2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show reduced growth	-	BIOGRID
668746	2540589	2543670	277115	280084	SPBC20F10.06	SPAPB1E7.06c	mad2	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show reduced growth	-	BIOGRID
668747	2540223	2540727	276756	277250	SPBC32F12.04	SPBC1921.03c	gtb1	mex67	tug1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of mex67 suppresses growth defects in a tug1/mad2 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
668748	2540589	2540727	277115	277250	SPBC20F10.06	SPBC1921.03c	mad2	mex67	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of mex67 suppresses growth defects in a tug1/mad2 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
668749	2540223	3361521	276756	280597	SPBC32F12.04	SPAC1610.03c	gtb1	crp79	tug1	meu5	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of crp79 suppresses growth defects in a tug1/mad2 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
668750	2540589	3361521	277115	280597	SPBC20F10.06	SPAC1610.03c	mad2	crp79	-	meu5	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of crp79 suppresses growth defects in a tug1/mad2 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
668751	2540223	2541466	276756	277968	SPBC32F12.04	SPAC14C4.06c	gtb1	nab2	tug1	SPAC14C4.06c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show reduced growth	-	BIOGRID
668752	2540589	2541466	277115	277968	SPBC20F10.06	SPAC14C4.06c	mad2	nab2	-	SPAC14C4.06c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2012)	22737087	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	genetic complex|triple mutants show reduced growth	-	BIOGRID
668845	2543114	2540794	279546	277313	SPAC607.05	SPBC582.07c	rpn9	rpn7	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sha Z (2007)	17761670	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
668846	2543114	2540025	279546	276569	SPAC607.05	SPBC16G5.01	rpn9	rpn12	-	SPBC342.07|mts3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sha Z (2007)	17761670	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
668847	2543114	2543682	279546	280096	SPAC607.05	SPAC637.10c	rpn9	rpn10	-	pus1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sha Z (2007)	17761670	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
668848	2540794	2543114	277313	279546	SPBC582.07c	SPAC607.05	rpn7	rpn9	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Sha Z (2007)	17761670	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
668889	2541139	2539026	277654	275599	SPBC646.16	SPCC1442.06	scl1	pre8	SPBC646.16	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lasker K (2012)	22307589	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
668890	2541139	2539378	277654	275944	SPBC646.16	SPCC1795.04c	scl1	pre10	SPBC646.16	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lasker K (2012)	22307589	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
668891	2541139	2539189	277654	275760	SPBC646.16	SPCC1682.16	scl1	rpt4	SPBC646.16	SPCC306.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lasker K (2012)	22307589	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
668892	2539026	2540487	275599	277015	SPCC1442.06	SPBC23G7.12c	pre8	rpt6	-	let1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lasker K (2012)	22307589	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
668893	2539026	3361518	275599	280594	SPCC1442.06	SPAC13C5.01c	pre8	pre9	-	SPAC13C5.01c|SPAC31A2.17c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lasker K (2012)	22307589	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
668894	2540175	2539862	276708	276409	SPBC106.16	SPBC16C6.07c	pre6	rpt1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lasker K (2012)	22307589	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
668896	2542559	2539378	279015	275944	SPAC6G10.04c	SPCC1795.04c	pre5	pre10	SPAC6G10.04c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lasker K (2012)	22307589	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
668897	2539862	2540939	276409	277455	SPBC16C6.07c	SPBC4.07c	rpt1	rpt2	-	mts2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lasker K (2012)	22307589	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
668898	2539862	2539539	276409	276101	SPBC16C6.07c	SPCC576.10c	rpt1	rpt3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lasker K (2012)	22307589	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
668899	2539862	2539189	276409	275760	SPBC16C6.07c	SPCC1682.16	rpt1	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lasker K (2012)	22307589	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
668900	2539862	3361462	276409	280538	SPBC16C6.07c	SPAC3A11.12c	rpt1	rpt5	-	pam2|tbp1|SPAC3H5.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lasker K (2012)	22307589	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
668901	2540939	2540487	277455	277015	SPBC4.07c	SPBC23G7.12c	rpt2	rpt6	mts2	let1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lasker K (2012)	22307589	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
668902	2539539	2539189	276101	275760	SPCC576.10c	SPCC1682.16	rpt3	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lasker K (2012)	22307589	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
668903	2539539	3361462	276101	280538	SPCC576.10c	SPAC3A11.12c	rpt3	rpt5	-	pam2|tbp1|SPAC3H5.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lasker K (2012)	22307589	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
668904	2539539	2540487	276101	277015	SPCC576.10c	SPBC23G7.12c	rpt3	rpt6	-	let1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lasker K (2012)	22307589	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
668905	2539189	3361462	275760	280538	SPCC1682.16	SPAC3A11.12c	rpt4	rpt5	SPCC306.01	pam2|tbp1|SPAC3H5.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lasker K (2012)	22307589	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
668906	2543682	3361462	280096	280538	SPAC637.10c	SPAC3A11.12c	rpn10	rpt5	pus1	pam2|tbp1|SPAC3H5.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lasker K (2012)	22307589	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
668907	2543040	2539539	279475	276101	SPAC31G5.13	SPCC576.10c	rpn11	rpt3	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lasker K (2012)	22307589	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
668908	2540191	2540939	276724	277455	SPBC17D11.07c	SPBC4.07c	rpn2	rpt2	-	mts2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lasker K (2012)	22307589	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
668909	2540191	2540487	276724	277015	SPBC17D11.07c	SPBC23G7.12c	rpn2	rpt6	-	let1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lasker K (2012)	22307589	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
668910	2541807	2539189	278298	275760	SPAC23G3.11	SPCC1682.16	rpn6	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lasker K (2012)	22307589	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
668911	2543040	2540109	279475	276646	SPAC31G5.13	SPBC119.01	rpn11	rpn3	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	SPBPJ4664.07	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lasker K (2012)	22307589	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
668912	2540109	2540794	276646	277313	SPBC119.01	SPBC582.07c	rpn3	rpn7	SPBPJ4664.07	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lasker K (2012)	22307589	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
668935	2541529	2542393	278029	278857	SPAC1687.13c	SPAC17G6.12	csn5	cul1	-	pcu1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Cope GA (2002)	12183637	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	No Modification	-	de-neddylation	-	BIOGRID
668938	2542393	2540352	278857	276881	SPAC17G6.12	SPBC215.03c	cul1	csn1	pcu1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Cope GA (2002)	12183637	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	de-neddylation	-	BIOGRID
668939	2542393	2541529	278857	278029	SPAC17G6.12	SPAC1687.13c	cul1	csn5	pcu1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Cope GA (2002)	12183637	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	de-neddylation	-	BIOGRID
669626	2542239	2540735	278711	277258	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC83.03c	chp1	tas3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Rougemaille M (2012)	22733737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
669627	2539423	2540735	275988	277258	SPCC663.12	SPBC83.03c	cid12	tas3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Rougemaille M (2012)	22733737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
669628	2539423	2539248	275988	275818	SPCC663.12	SPCC1739.03	cid12	hrr1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Rougemaille M (2012)	22733737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
669629	2542198	2540735	278673	277258	SPAC6F12.09	SPBC83.03c	rdp1	tas3	rdr1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Rougemaille M (2012)	22733737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
669630	2542198	2539248	278673	275818	SPAC6F12.09	SPCC1739.03	rdp1	hrr1	rdr1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Rougemaille M (2012)	22733737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
669631	2542198	2539423	278673	275988	SPAC6F12.09	SPCC663.12	rdp1	cid12	rdr1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Rougemaille M (2012)	22733737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
669632	2538690	2541633	275275	278129	SPCC1393.05	SPAC664.01c	ers1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Two-hybrid	physical	Rougemaille M (2012)	22733737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
669633	2538690	2539423	275275	275988	SPCC1393.05	SPCC663.12	ers1	cid12	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Rougemaille M (2012)	22733737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
669634	2538690	2539248	275275	275818	SPCC1393.05	SPCC1739.03	ers1	hrr1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Rougemaille M (2012)	22733737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
669635	2538690	2542198	275275	278673	SPCC1393.05	SPAC6F12.09	ers1	rdp1	-	rdr1	Two-hybrid	physical	Rougemaille M (2012)	22733737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
669636	2538690	2538930	275275	275506	SPCC1393.05	SPCC188.13c	ers1	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Two-hybrid	physical	Rougemaille M (2012)	22733737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
669637	2540735	2538690	277258	275275	SPBC83.03c	SPCC1393.05	tas3	ers1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Rougemaille M (2012)	22733737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
669638	2538690	2541633	275275	278129	SPCC1393.05	SPAC664.01c	ers1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Rougemaille M (2012)	22733737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
669651	2538690	2541633	275275	278129	SPCC1393.05	SPAC664.01c	ers1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Rougemaille M (2012)	22733737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
669654	2540735	2538690	277258	275275	SPBC83.03c	SPCC1393.05	tas3	ers1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Rougemaille M (2012)	22733737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
669655	2542239	2538690	278711	275275	SPAC18G6.02c	SPCC1393.05	chp1	ers1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Rougemaille M (2012)	22733737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
669656	2542198	2538690	278673	275275	SPAC6F12.09	SPCC1393.05	rdp1	ers1	rdr1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Rougemaille M (2012)	22733737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
669657	2539248	2538690	275818	275275	SPCC1739.03	SPCC1393.05	hrr1	ers1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Rougemaille M (2012)	22733737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
669658	2538930	2538690	275506	275275	SPCC188.13c	SPCC1393.05	dcr1	ers1	SPCC584.10c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Rougemaille M (2012)	22733737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
669679	2538690	2542198	275275	278673	SPCC1393.05	SPAC6F12.09	ers1	rdp1	-	rdr1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Rougemaille M (2012)	22733737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
669680	2542198	2542239	278673	278711	SPAC6F12.09	SPAC18G6.02c	rdp1	chp1	rdr1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Rougemaille M (2012)	22733737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
669681	2538930	2542198	275506	278673	SPCC188.13c	SPAC6F12.09	dcr1	rdp1	SPCC584.10c	rdr1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Rougemaille M (2012)	22733737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
669682	2538690	2538930	275275	275506	SPCC1393.05	SPCC188.13c	ers1	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Rougemaille M (2012)	22733737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
669683	2538690	2539248	275275	275818	SPCC1393.05	SPCC1739.03	ers1	hrr1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Rougemaille M (2012)	22733737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	overexpression of the RDRC component Hrr1 or Dcr1 suppresses the Ers1 dominant-negative defect in pericentromeric reporter gene silencing	-	BIOGRID
669684	2538690	2538930	275275	275506	SPCC1393.05	SPCC188.13c	ers1	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Rougemaille M (2012)	22733737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	overexpression of the RDRC component Hrr1 or Dcr1 suppresses the Ers1 dominant-negative defect in pericentromeric reporter gene silencing	-	BIOGRID
669688	2538930	2538690	275506	275275	SPCC188.13c	SPCC1393.05	dcr1	ers1	SPCC584.10c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Rougemaille M (2012)	22733737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	overexpression of the Ers1 rescues the dominant negative defect in pericentromeric gene silencing see in a Dcr1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
669689	2538690	2542047	275275	278528	SPCC1393.05	SPAC21E11.03c	ers1	pcr1	-	mts2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rougemaille M (2012)	22733737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	double mutants show increased defects in gene silencing	-	BIOGRID
669690	2538690	2538930	275275	275506	SPCC1393.05	SPCC188.13c	ers1	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rougemaille M (2012)	22733737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	double mutants show increased defects in gene silencing	-	BIOGRID
669718	2538690	2541372	275275	277883	SPCC1393.05	SPBP8B7.28c	ers1	stc1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Rougemaille M (2012)	22733737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
669719	2542239	2540735	278711	277258	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC83.03c	chp1	tas3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Rougemaille M (2012)	22733737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
669819	2539004	2543668	275578	280082	SPCC4G3.05c	SPAC9.05	mus81	fml1	slx3	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lorenz A (2012)	22723423	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance|mating efficiency	double mutants show decreased mating efficiency and increased defects in DNA aggragation	-	BIOGRID
669820	2539004	2540584	275578	277110	SPCC4G3.05c	SPBC28F2.07	mus81	sfr1	slx3	dds20|mug13	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Lorenz A (2012)	22723423	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:partial rescue	deletion of sfr1 partially rescues spore viability in a mus81 mutant background	-	BIOGRID
669821	2540584	2543668	277110	280082	SPBC28F2.07	SPAC9.05	sfr1	fml1	dds20|mug13	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Lorenz A (2012)	22723423	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue|sporulation:partial rescue	rescue of mus81 mutants by deletion of sfr1 and the reduction of CO formation associated with GC in a sfr1 single mutant depend on the presence of fml1	-	BIOGRID
669822	2539004	2542150	275578	278626	SPCC4G3.05c	SPAC17A5.11	mus81	rec12	slx3	spo11	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Lorenz A (2012)	22723423	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:partial rescue	genetic complex|spore viability in the mus81/fml1/rec12 and mus81/fml1/sfr1/rec12 crosses is partially restored by deletion of rec12	-	BIOGRID
669823	2543668	2542150	280082	278626	SPAC9.05	SPAC17A5.11	fml1	rec12	-	spo11	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Lorenz A (2012)	22723423	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:partial rescue	genetic complex|spore viability in the mus81/fml1/rec12 and mus81/fml1/sfr1/rec12 crosses is partially restored by deletion of rec12	-	BIOGRID
669824	2540584	2542150	277110	278626	SPBC28F2.07	SPAC17A5.11	sfr1	rec12	dds20|mug13	spo11	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Lorenz A (2012)	22723423	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:partial rescue	genetic complex|spore viability in the mus81/fml1/rec12 and mus81/fml1/sfr1/rec12 crosses is partially restored by deletion of rec12	-	BIOGRID
669825	2539004	2543668	275578	280082	SPCC4G3.05c	SPAC9.05	mus81	fml1	slx3	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Lorenz A (2012)	22723423	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:partial rescue	overexpression of fml1 partially rescues the spore viability of a mus81 mutant	-	BIOGRID
669843	2540719	2540880	277242	277397	SPBC216.05	SPBC582.03	rad3	cdc13	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lin SJ (2012)	22761595	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
669844	2543544	2543281	279961	279708	SPAC664.07c	SPAC23C4.18c	rad9	rad4	-	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Lin SJ (2012)	22761595	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification:wild type	expression of a rad3-rad4 tethered protein eliminates the need for rad9 for phosphorylation of chk1	-	BIOGRID
669847	2540348	2539209	276877	275779	SPBC29A10.05	SPCC23B6.03c	exo1	tel1	mut2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lin SJ (2012)	22761595	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	double mutants show increased defects in chk1 phosphorylation	-	BIOGRID
669856	2543281	2543544	279708	279961	SPAC23C4.18c	SPAC664.07c	rad4	rad9	cut5|dpb11|dre3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Lin SJ (2012)	22761595	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to MMS (CID 4156 CHEBI 25255) and UV	-	BIOGRID
669895	2542805	2539765	279253	276316	SPAC15A10.08	SPBC1778.06c	ain1	fim1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Laporte D (2012)	22740629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:wild type|protein/peptide distribution:wild type	Fim1 overexpression can rescue abnormal node condensation in ain1 mutants	-	BIOGRID
669896	2542805	2539765	279253	276316	SPAC15A10.08	SPBC1778.06c	ain1	fim1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Laporte D (2012)	22740629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology	reduced transcription of fim1 enhances actomyosin ring defects in an ain1 mutant background	-	BIOGRID
669897	2542805	2540660	279253	277185	SPAC15A10.08	SPBC21.06c	ain1	cdc7	-	its10|pld1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Laporte D (2012)	22740629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology|heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to temperature and defects in actomyosin ring formation	-	BIOGRID
669898	2542805	2539149	279253	275721	SPAC15A10.08	SPCC1739.11c	ain1	cdc11	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Laporte D (2012)	22740629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology|heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to temperature and defects in actomyosin ring formation	-	BIOGRID
669899	2542805	2541975	279253	278460	SPAC15A10.08	SPAC20G8.05c	ain1	cdc15	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Laporte D (2012)	22740629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology|heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to temperature and defects in actomyosin ring formation	-	BIOGRID
669901	2542032	2539090	278514	275662	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC126.02c	pnk1	pku70	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kashkina E (2012)	22748672	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to UV damage	-	BIOGRID
669902	2542032	2543580	278514	279995	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC644.14c	pnk1	rad51	-	rhp51	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kashkina E (2012)	22748672	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to UV damage	-	BIOGRID
669903	2542032	2540679	278514	277204	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC3D6.10	pnk1	apn2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kashkina E (2012)	22748672	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
669904	2542032	2543510	278514	279928	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC30D11.07	pnk1	nth1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kashkina E (2012)	22748672	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	deletion of nth1 partially rescues sensitivity to MMS (CID 4156 CHEBI 25255) in a pnk1 mutant|deletion of nth1 partially rescues the lethality in a pnk1/apn2 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
669905	2540679	2543510	277204	279928	SPBC3D6.10	SPAC30D11.07	apn2	nth1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kashkina E (2012)	22748672	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	deletion of nth1 partially rescues apn2 sensitivity to MMS (CID 4156 CHEBI 25255)|deletion of nth1 partially rescues the lethality in a pnk1/apn2 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
669906	2542032	2539579	278514	276138	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCP31B10.05	pnk1	tdp1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kashkina E (2012)	22748672	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	deletion of tdp1 partially rescues sensitivity to MMS (CID 4156 CHEBI 25255) in a pnk1 mutant|deletion of tdp1 partially rescues the lethality in a pnk1/apn2 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
669907	2540679	2539579	277204	276138	SPBC3D6.10	SPCP31B10.05	apn2	tdp1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kashkina E (2012)	22748672	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	deletion of tdp1 partially rescues the lethality in a pnk1/apn2 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
669909	2540679	2539579	277204	276138	SPBC3D6.10	SPCP31B10.05	apn2	tdp1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kashkina E (2012)	22748672	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to MMS (CID 4156 CHEBI 25255)	-	BIOGRID
669911	2542467	2542239	278928	278711	SPAC1834.04	SPAC18G6.02c	hht1	chp1	-	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Ishida M (2012)	22727667	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	wild-type Chp1-CD and Swi6-CD bound strongly to H3K9me3 peptide but only negligibly to unmodified H3 peptides	-	BIOGRID
669912	2542467	2541633	278928	278129	SPAC1834.04	SPAC664.01c	hht1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Protein-peptide	physical	Ishida M (2012)	22727667	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	wild-type Chp1-CD and Swi6-CD bound strongly to H3K9me3 peptide but only negligibly to unmodified H3 peptides	-	BIOGRID
669924	2542467	2540825	278928	277343	SPAC1834.04	SPBC428.08c	hht1	clr4	-	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Ishida M (2012)	22727667	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
670060	2543390	2539765	279812	276316	SPAC631.01c	SPBC1778.06c	acp2	fim1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kovar DR (2005)	15743909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
670061	2543390	2543526	279812	279944	SPAC631.01c	SPAC4A8.15c	acp2	cdc3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kovar DR (2005)	15743909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
670062	2543390	2540051	279812	276589	SPAC631.01c	SPBC32H8.12c	acp2	act1	-	cps8|pi012	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kovar DR (2005)	15743909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
670073	2543390	2542805	279812	279253	SPAC631.01c	SPAC15A10.08	acp2	ain1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kovar DR (2005)	15743909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
670074	2543390	2541699	279812	278195	SPAC631.01c	SPAP8A3.08	acp2	cdc4	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kovar DR (2005)	15743909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
670075	2543390	2541975	279812	278460	SPAC631.01c	SPAC20G8.05c	acp2	cdc15	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kovar DR (2005)	15743909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
670076	2543390	2543129	279812	279561	SPAC631.01c	SPAC4F8.13c	acp2	rng2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kovar DR (2005)	15743909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
670077	2543390	2539205	279812	275775	SPAC631.01c	SPCC4B3.15	acp2	mid1	-	dmf1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kovar DR (2005)	15743909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
670078	2543390	2540582	279812	277108	SPAC631.01c	SPBC26H8.07c	acp2	nda3	-	alp12|ben1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kovar DR (2005)	15743909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
670079	2543390	2543233	279812	279661	SPAC631.01c	SPAC630.03	acp2	arp3	-	act2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kovar DR (2005)	15743909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
670083	2543390	2541603	279812	278100	SPAC631.01c	SPAC1F5.04c	acp2	cdc12	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kovar DR (2005)	15743909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
670084	2543390	2539513	279812	276075	SPAC631.01c	SPCC645.05c	acp2	myo2	-	rng5	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kovar DR (2005)	15743909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
670088	2539242	2539991	275812	276535	SPCC290.04	SPBC1105.12	ams2	hhf3	SPCC4F11.01	h4.3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Takahashi K (2005)	15897182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution:wild type	overproduction of histone H4 suppressed the defect of SpCENP-A localization in Ams2-deficient cells	-	BIOGRID
670089	2541936	2542285	278423	278753	SPAC222.10c	SPAC17H9.09c	byr4	ras1	-	ste5	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Song K (1996)	8682866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis	nhibition of cytokinesis by byr4 overexpression was exacerbated by null alleles of ras1 and scd1	-	BIOGRID
670090	2541936	2542337	278423	278803	SPAC222.10c	SPAC16E8.09	byr4	scd1	-	ral1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Song K (1996)	8682866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis	nhibition of cytokinesis by byr4 overexpression was exacerbated by null alleles of ras1 and scd1	-	BIOGRID
670201	2540002	2543526	276546	279944	SPBC14C8.06	SPAC4A8.15c	arc1	cdc3	sop2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Balasubramanian MK (1996)	8978670	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
670291	2540580	2542080	277106	278557	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC27D7.03c	ran1	mei2	pat1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	DeVoti J (1991)	1657594	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	loss of mei2 is sufficient to bypass the growth defect caused by loss of ran1	-	BIOGRID
670346	2539437	2540029	276000	276573	SPCC645.06c	SPBC16A3.01	rgf3	spn3	lad1	SPBC543.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Morrell-Falvey JL (2005)	16291723	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell death:partial rescue	mutation of spn3 delays but does not rescue the lysis defect seen in a lad1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
670347	2539437	2541612	276000	278109	SPCC645.06c	SPAC1F7.04	rgf3	rho1	lad1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Morrell-Falvey JL (2005)	16291723	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell death:wild type	SPBC651.03c and rho1 overexpression rescue the lysis defect seen in a lad1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
670348	2542285	2542137	278753	278613	SPAC17H9.09c	SPAC1D4.13	ras1	byr1	ste5	ste1|ste3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Xu HP (1992)	1515675	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue	overexpression of byr genes suppresses the mating defects seen in a ras1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
670349	2542285	2540612	278753	277138	SPAC17H9.09c	SPBC1D7.05	ras1	byr2	ste5	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Xu HP (1992)	1515675	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue	overexpression of byr genes suppresses the mating defects seen in a ras1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
670351	2539047	2539487	275620	276050	SPCC1223.06	SPCC895.05	tea1	for3	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Martin SG (2005)	15809031	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
670352	2539047	2542619	275620	279073	SPCC1223.06	SPAC6G10.02c	tea1	tea3	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Martin SG (2005)	15809031	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
670353	2539642	2543044	276197	279479	SPBC1706.01	SPAC3C7.12	tea4	tip1	wsh3	noc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Martin SG (2005)	15809031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
670354	2539642	2543044	276197	279479	SPBC1706.01	SPAC3C7.12	tea4	tip1	wsh3	noc1	Two-hybrid	physical	Martin SG (2005)	15809031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
670355	2539642	2539487	276197	276050	SPBC1706.01	SPCC895.05	tea4	for3	wsh3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Martin SG (2005)	15809031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
670356	2539642	2539487	276197	276050	SPBC1706.01	SPCC895.05	tea4	for3	wsh3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Martin SG (2005)	15809031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
670357	2539487	2539642	276050	276197	SPCC895.05	SPBC1706.01	for3	tea4	-	wsh3	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Martin SG (2005)	15809031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
670358	2539047	2539487	275620	276050	SPCC1223.06	SPCC895.05	tea1	for3	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Martin SG (2005)	15809031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
670359	2539487	2539642	276050	276197	SPCC895.05	SPBC1706.01	for3	tea4	-	wsh3	Two-hybrid	physical	Martin SG (2005)	15809031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
671456	2539869	2541614	276415	278111	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC29A4.20	cdc2	elp3	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	kat9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bauer F (2012)	22768388	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	cdc2/elp3/ctu1 triple mutants show enhanced growth defects|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
671457	2539869	2540314	276415	276844	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC2G5.03	cdc2	ctu1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bauer F (2012)	22768388	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	cdc2/elp3/ctu1 triple mutants show enhanced growth defects|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
671458	2542632	2541614	279086	278111	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC29A4.20	cdc25	elp3	sal2	kat9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bauer F (2012)	22768388	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	cdc2/elp3/ctu1 triple mutants show enhanced growth defects|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
671459	2542632	2540314	279086	276844	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC2G5.03	cdc25	ctu1	sal2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bauer F (2012)	22768388	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	cdc2/elp3/ctu1 triple mutants show enhanced growth defects|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
671460	2540880	2541614	277397	278111	SPBC582.03	SPAC29A4.20	cdc13	elp3	-	kat9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bauer F (2012)	22768388	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	cdc2/elp3/ctu1 triple mutants show enhanced growth defects|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
671461	2540880	2540314	277397	276844	SPBC582.03	SPBC2G5.03	cdc13	ctu1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bauer F (2012)	22768388	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	cdc2/elp3/ctu1 triple mutants show enhanced growth defects|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
671462	2540314	2541614	276844	278111	SPBC2G5.03	SPAC29A4.20	ctu1	elp3	-	kat9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bauer F (2012)	22768388	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
671471	2542404	2540720	278868	277243	SPAC57A7.11	SPBC216.07c	mip1	tor2	-	SPBC646.01c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Takahara T (2012)	22762302	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
671472	2542502	2539214	278960	275784	SPAC139.06	SPCC1672.10	hat1	mis16	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Tong K (2012)	22771823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
671473	2542502	2542463	278960	278924	SPAC139.06	SPAC1834.03c	hat1	hhf1	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	h4.1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Tong K (2012)	22771823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Acetylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
671474	2542502	2541200	278960	277714	SPAC139.06	SPBC8D2.03c	hat1	hhf2	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	ams3|h4.2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Tong K (2012)	22771823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Acetylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
671477	2542502	2539991	278960	276535	SPAC139.06	SPBC1105.12	hat1	hhf3	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	h4.3	Biochemical Activity	physical	Tong K (2012)	22771823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Acetylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
671498	2542129	2540127	278605	276664	SPAC17G8.12	SPBC106.20	sec3	exo70	SPAC17G8.12	SPBC582.02	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bendezu FO (2012)	22768263	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|protein/peptide accumulation	double mutants show lethality and aberrant localization of the exocyst	-	BIOGRID
672229	2541975	2541957	278460	278444	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC23C11.16	cdc15	plo1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cullen CF (2000)	10924454	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
672230	2539149	2541957	275721	278444	SPCC1739.11c	SPAC23C11.16	cdc11	plo1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cullen CF (2000)	10924454	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
672231	2542761	2541957	279211	278444	SPAC1565.06c	SPAC23C11.16	spg1	plo1	sid3	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cullen CF (2000)	10924454	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
672241	2541975	2540660	278460	277185	SPAC20G8.05c	SPBC21.06c	cdc15	cdc7	-	its10|pld1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cullen CF (2000)	10924454	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
672242	2541975	2542761	278460	279211	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC1565.06c	cdc15	spg1	-	sid3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cullen CF (2000)	10924454	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
672243	2539149	2540660	275721	277185	SPCC1739.11c	SPBC21.06c	cdc11	cdc7	-	its10|pld1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cullen CF (2000)	10924454	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
672244	2539149	2542761	275721	279211	SPCC1739.11c	SPAC1565.06c	cdc11	spg1	-	sid3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cullen CF (2000)	10924454	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
672245	2539149	2540528	275721	277056	SPCC1739.11c	SPBC18H10.04c	cdc11	sce3	-	tif48	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cullen CF (2000)	10924454	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
672246	2539149	2541612	275721	278109	SPCC1739.11c	SPAC1F7.04	cdc11	rho1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cullen CF (2000)	10924454	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
672247	2539149	2541940	275721	278427	SPCC1739.11c	SPAC27F1.02c	cdc11	cdc8	-	fus4	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cullen CF (2000)	10924454	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
672248	2541599	2540660	278096	277185	SPAC24B11.11c	SPBC21.06c	sid2	cdc7	-	its10|pld1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cullen CF (2000)	10924454	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
672249	2541599	2542761	278096	279211	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC1565.06c	sid2	spg1	-	sid3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cullen CF (2000)	10924454	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
672250	2541599	2540528	278096	277056	SPAC24B11.11c	SPBC18H10.04c	sid2	sce3	-	tif48	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cullen CF (2000)	10924454	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
672251	2541599	2541612	278096	278109	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC1F7.04	sid2	rho1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cullen CF (2000)	10924454	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
672252	2541599	2541940	278096	278427	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC27F1.02c	sid2	cdc8	-	fus4	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cullen CF (2000)	10924454	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
672261	2540660	2542162	277185	278638	SPBC21.06c	SPAC6F6.08c	cdc7	cdc16	its10|pld1	bub2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Cullen CF (2000)	10924454	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
672262	2542162	2540660	278638	277185	SPAC6F6.08c	SPBC21.06c	cdc16	cdc7	bub2	its10|pld1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Cullen CF (2000)	10924454	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
672265	2542162	2540660	278638	277185	SPAC6F6.08c	SPBC21.06c	cdc16	cdc7	bub2	its10|pld1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cullen CF (2000)	10924454	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
672266	2542162	2542409	278638	278873	SPAC6F6.08c	SPAC17G8.10c	cdc16	dma1	bub2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cullen CF (2000)	10924454	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
672267	2542162	2542829	278638	279276	SPAC6F6.08c	SPAC13D6.02c	cdc16	byr3	bub2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cullen CF (2000)	10924454	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
672268	2542162	2541936	278638	278423	SPAC6F6.08c	SPAC222.10c	cdc16	byr4	bub2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cullen CF (2000)	10924454	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
672275	2541141	2541957	277656	278444	SPBC649.05	SPAC23C11.16	cut12	plo1	stf1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	MacIver FH (2003)	12815070	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	plo1 suppresses the ability of cut12 mutation to rescue cdc25 mutants	-	BIOGRID
672547	2542761	2539379	279211	275945	SPAC1565.06c	SPCC188.02	spg1	par1	sid3	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Jiang W (2001)	11514436	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
672548	2541936	2539379	278423	275945	SPAC222.10c	SPCC188.02	byr4	par1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Jiang W (2001)	11514436	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:partial rescue	in par1 par2 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
672549	2541936	2542891	278423	279335	SPAC222.10c	SPAC6F12.12	byr4	par2	-	pbp2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Jiang W (2001)	11514436	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:partial rescue	in par1 par2 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
672550	2541806	2542219	278297	278693	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC18G6.03	prz1	ypt3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hirayama S (2003)	12637524	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
672552	2540024	2540737	276568	277260	SPBP4H10.04	SPBC19G7.05c	ppb1	bgs1	SPBC1346.01c	cps1|drc1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hirayama S (2003)	12637524	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
672553	2540024	2542231	276568	278704	SPBP4H10.04	SPAC19G12.14	ppb1	its3	SPBC1346.01c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hirayama S (2003)	12637524	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
672554	2540024	2542219	276568	278693	SPBP4H10.04	SPAC18G6.03	ppb1	ypt3	SPBC1346.01c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hirayama S (2003)	12637524	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
672555	2540024	2541199	276568	277713	SPBP4H10.04	SPBC839.08c	ppb1	its8	SPBC1346.01c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hirayama S (2003)	12637524	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
672556	2540024	2540660	276568	277185	SPBP4H10.04	SPBC21.06c	ppb1	cdc7	SPBC1346.01c	its10|pld1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hirayama S (2003)	12637524	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
672557	2541806	2542231	278297	278704	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC19G12.14	prz1	its3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hirayama S (2003)	12637524	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
673600	2539881	2541620	276427	278117	SPBC16G5.12c	SPAC2G11.12	top3	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Laursen LV (2003)	12724426	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable:wild type	rqh1 mutant rescues lethality of strain overexpressing top3-Y330F|rqh1 mutant rescues lethality of top3-d mutant	-	BIOGRID
673602	2539312	2543413	275879	279835	SPCC777.14	SPAC4F8.12c	prp4	spp42	-	cwf6	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Schmidt H (1999)	10545451	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA modification	splicing defect	-	BIOGRID
674795	2542094	2541755	278571	278249	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC2F7.11	rcd1	nrd1	-	msa2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tsukahara K (1998)	9671458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:wild type	nrd1+ deletion suppresses sterility of rcd1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
674796	2542632	2539997	279086	276541	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC1604.14c	cdc25	shk1	sal2	orb2|pak1	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Gilbreth M (1998)	9843966	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
674852	2540558	2539481	277085	276044	SPBC2D10.17	SPCC622.16c	clr1	epe1	-	kdm2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ayoub N (2003)	12773576	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	Inactivation of Epe1 suppresses mutations in silencing genes	-	BIOGRID
674853	2542596	2539481	279050	276044	SPAC1B3.17	SPCC622.16c	clr2	epe1	-	kdm2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ayoub N (2003)	12773576	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	Inactivation of Epe1 suppresses mutations in silencing genes	-	BIOGRID
674854	2540821	2539481	277339	276044	SPBC800.03	SPCC622.16c	clr3	epe1	-	kdm2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ayoub N (2003)	12773576	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	Inactivation of Epe1 suppresses mutations in silencing genes	-	BIOGRID
674855	2540368	2539481	276897	276044	SPBC36.05c	SPCC622.16c	clr6	epe1	-	kdm2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ayoub N (2003)	12773576	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	Inactivation of Epe1 suppresses mutations in silencing genes	-	BIOGRID
675016	2542383	2540361	278847	276890	SPAC17H9.17c	SPBC2F12.13	mdm10	klp5	-	sot1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Berger KH (1997)	9024686	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|mitochondrial morphology:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
675017	2540562	2540361	277089	276890	SPBC28F2.06c	SPBC2F12.13	mdm12	klp5	-	sot1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Berger KH (1997)	9024686	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|mitochondrial morphology:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
675051	2541620	2541051	278117	277566	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC3E7.08c	rqh1	rad13	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yonemasu R (1997)	9092661	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	-	-	BIOGRID
675055	2541677	2540612	278173	277138	SPAC1565.04c	SPBC1D7.05	ste4	byr2	-	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Barr MM (1996)	8816472	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue	genetic complex|mating defects in a ste4 mutant can be partially suppressed by overexpression of byr2, byr1/byr2 or ras1/byr2	-	BIOGRID
675056	2541677	2542137	278173	278613	SPAC1565.04c	SPAC1D4.13	ste4	byr1	-	ste1|ste3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Barr MM (1996)	8816472	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue	genetic complex|mating defects in a ste4 mutant can be partially suppressed by overexpression of byr2, byr1/byr2 or ras1/byr2	-	BIOGRID
675057	2541677	2542285	278173	278753	SPAC1565.04c	SPAC17H9.09c	ste4	ras1	-	ste5	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Barr MM (1996)	8816472	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue	genetic complex|mating defects in a ste4 mutant can be partially suppressed by overexpression of byr2, byr1/byr2 or ras1/byr2	-	BIOGRID
675058	2542285	2540612	278753	277138	SPAC17H9.09c	SPBC1D7.05	ras1	byr2	ste5	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Barr MM (1996)	8816472	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue|sporulation:partial rescue	overexpression of byr2 suppresses mating and sporulation defects in a ras1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
675059	2539149	2539358	275721	275924	SPCC1739.11c	SPCC16C4.07	cdc11	scw1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2003)	12796296	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
675060	2540582	2539358	277108	275924	SPBC26H8.07c	SPCC16C4.07	nda3	scw1	alp12|ben1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Jin QW (2003)	12796296	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytoskeleton morphology:partial rescue	scw1 mutation partially stabilizes microtubules in an nda3 mutant	-	BIOGRID
675061	2540845	2541599	277362	278096	SPBC428.13c	SPAC24B11.11c	mob1	sid2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salimova E (2000)	10769201	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
675062	2540845	2540650	277362	277175	SPBC428.13c	SPBC244.01c	mob1	sid4	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salimova E (2000)	10769201	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
675063	2540845	2539149	277362	275721	SPBC428.13c	SPCC1739.11c	mob1	cdc11	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salimova E (2000)	10769201	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
675064	2540845	2540624	277362	277150	SPBC428.13c	SPBC24C6.07	mob1	cdc14	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salimova E (2000)	10769201	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
675065	2540660	2540845	277185	277362	SPBC21.06c	SPBC428.13c	cdc7	mob1	its10|pld1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Salimova E (2000)	10769201	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	double mutants show a reduced restrictive temperature compared to parent strains	-	BIOGRID
675066	2542746	2540845	279196	277362	SPAC9G1.09	SPBC428.13c	sid1	mob1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Salimova E (2000)	10769201	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	double mutants show a reduced restrictive temperature compared to parent strains	-	BIOGRID
675067	2539513	2540845	276075	277362	SPCC645.05c	SPBC428.13c	myo2	mob1	rng5	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Salimova E (2000)	10769201	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	double mutants show a reduced restrictive temperature compared to parent strains	-	BIOGRID
675068	2543129	2540845	279561	277362	SPAC4F8.13c	SPBC428.13c	rng2	mob1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Salimova E (2000)	10769201	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	double mutants show a reduced restrictive temperature compared to parent strains	-	BIOGRID
675069	2540845	2542409	277362	278873	SPBC428.13c	SPAC17G8.10c	mob1	dma1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Salimova E (2000)	10769201	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:partial rescue	the null allele of dma1 gave weak suppression of mob1-R4 septum defects	-	BIOGRID
675070	2540845	2539958	277362	276502	SPBC428.13c	SPBC1718.07c	mob1	zfs1	-	moc4	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Salimova E (2000)	10769201	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
675071	2540845	2540660	277362	277185	SPBC428.13c	SPBC21.06c	mob1	cdc7	-	its10|pld1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Salimova E (2000)	10769201	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	double mutants formed very small, slow-growing colonies containing many dead cells	-	BIOGRID
675072	2540845	2542761	277362	279211	SPBC428.13c	SPAC1565.06c	mob1	spg1	-	sid3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Salimova E (2000)	10769201	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	double mutants formed very small, slow-growing colonies containing many dead cells	-	BIOGRID
675073	2540845	2542162	277362	278638	SPBC428.13c	SPAC6F6.08c	mob1	cdc16	-	bub2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Salimova E (2000)	10769201	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	double mutants formed very small, slow-growing colonies containing many dead cells	-	BIOGRID
675074	2540845	2541699	277362	278195	SPBC428.13c	SPAP8A3.08	mob1	cdc4	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Salimova E (2000)	10769201	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	double mutants formed very small, slow-growing colonies containing many dead cells	-	BIOGRID
675075	2539123	2542632	275695	279086	SPCC18B5.03	SPAC24H6.05	wee1	cdc25	-	sal2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sveiczer A (1996)	9013342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|cell size|vegetative growth	double mutants show decreased growth rate and increased defects in cell size and shape	-	BIOGRID
675076	2539123	2539640	275695	276195	SPCC18B5.03	SPBC32F12.09	wee1	rum1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sveiczer A (1996)	9013342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show a loss of size control	-	BIOGRID
675077	2539869	2539123	276415	275695	SPBC11B10.09	SPCC18B5.03	cdc2	wee1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sveiczer A (1996)	9013342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show smaller cell size	-	BIOGRID
675078	2540992	2539087	277508	275659	SPBC342.05	SPCC1259.13	crb2	chk1	rhp9	rad27	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Qu M (2012)	22792081	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
675079	2540992	2539087	277508	275659	SPBC342.05	SPCC1259.13	crb2	chk1	rhp9	rad27	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Qu M (2012)	22792081	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
675623	2542409	2540499	278873	277027	SPAC17G8.10c	SPBC25D12.02c	dma1	dnt1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22809626	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
675624	2540499	2542409	277027	278873	SPBC25D12.02c	SPAC17G8.10c	dnt1	dma1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22809626	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
675625	2542409	2540499	278873	277027	SPAC17G8.10c	SPBC25D12.02c	dma1	dnt1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22809626	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
675626	2542409	2540499	278873	277027	SPAC17G8.10c	SPBC25D12.02c	dma1	dnt1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22809626	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
675627	2542409	2540650	278873	277175	SPAC17G8.10c	SPBC244.01c	dma1	sid4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22809626	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
675651	2543544	2538959	279961	275533	SPAC664.07c	SPCC18B5.11c	rad9	cds1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Janes S (2012)	22797921	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression	double mutants show a lack of normal cell cycle arrest	-	BIOGRID
675652	2543544	2540719	279961	277242	SPAC664.07c	SPBC216.05	rad9	rad3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Janes S (2012)	22797921	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression	double mutants show a lack of normal cell cycle arrest	-	BIOGRID
675653	2543544	2541643	279961	278139	SPAC664.07c	SPAC14C4.13	rad9	rad17	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Janes S (2012)	22797921	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression	double mutants show a lack of normal cell cycle arrest	-	BIOGRID
675654	2539209	2540719	275779	277242	SPCC23B6.03c	SPBC216.05	tel1	rad3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Janes S (2012)	22797921	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression	double mutants show a lack of normal cell cycle arrest	-	BIOGRID
675655	2542632	2540885	279086	277402	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC660.14	cdc25	mik1	sal2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Frazer C (2012)	22806395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423)	-	BIOGRID
675871	2542409	2542409	278873	278873	SPAC17G8.10c	SPAC17G8.10c	dma1	dma1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22809626	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	autoubiquitination (E1, E2-Ubc4 human, added to reaction)	-	BIOGRID
675872	2543187	2543187	279616	279616	SPAC343.03	SPAC343.03	apc11	apc11	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22809626	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	autoubiquitination (E1, E2-Ubc4 human, added to reaction)	-	BIOGRID
675873	2540499	2542409	277027	278873	SPBC25D12.02c	SPAC17G8.10c	dnt1	dma1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Wang Y (2012)	22809626	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	dma1 deletion rescues growth defect of dnt1 plo1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
675874	2540499	2542409	277027	278873	SPBC25D12.02c	SPAC17G8.10c	dnt1	dma1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Wang Y (2012)	22809626	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spindle morphology:partial rescue	dma1 deletion partially suppresses spindle formation defect of dnt1 plo1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
675877	2540499	2542409	277027	278873	SPBC25D12.02c	SPAC17G8.10c	dnt1	dma1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Wang Y (2012)	22809626	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in M phase	Dma1 overexpression causes mitotic arrest in dnt1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
675878	2542409	2540499	278873	277027	SPAC17G8.10c	SPBC25D12.02c	dma1	dnt1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Wang Y (2012)	22809626	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
676002	2540574	2543580	277101	279995	SPBC409.03	SPAC644.14c	swi5	rad51	-	rhp51	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Akamatsu Y (2003)	14663140	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue|gamma ray resistance:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	rhp51 overexpression rescues the MMS (CID 4156 CHEBI 25255), gamma-ray, and UV sensitivities of swi5 null mutants	-	BIOGRID
676003	2541530	2540580	278030	277106	SPAC57A10.10c	SPBC19C2.05	sla1	ran1	-	pat1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tanabe K (2003)	14665462	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of sla1 partially suppresses the temperature sensitivity of a pat1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
676004	2540719	2542420	277242	278883	SPBC216.05	SPAC19D5.03	rad3	cid1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wang SW (2000)	10757807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of Cid1 partially rescues HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423) sensitivity in a rad mutant	-	BIOGRID
676005	2543544	2542420	279961	278883	SPAC664.07c	SPAC19D5.03	rad9	cid1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wang SW (2000)	10757807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of Cid1 partially rescues HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423) sensitivity in a rad mutant	-	BIOGRID
676006	2541643	2542420	278139	278883	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC19D5.03	rad17	cid1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wang SW (2000)	10757807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of Cid1 partially rescues HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423) sensitivity in a rad mutant	-	BIOGRID
676007	2542083	2538959	278560	275533	SPAC27E2.05	SPCC18B5.11c	cdc1	cds1	mis1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wang SW (2000)	10757807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of Cds1 or Chk1 partially rescues HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423) sensitivity in a cdc1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
676008	2542083	2539087	278560	275659	SPAC27E2.05	SPCC1259.13	cdc1	chk1	mis1	rad27	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wang SW (2000)	10757807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of Cds1 or Chk1 partially rescues HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423) sensitivity in a cdc1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
676009	2538757	2539997	275340	276541	SPCC16C4.08c	SPBC1604.14c	skb15	shk1	-	orb2|pak1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kim HW (2001)	11389855	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
676010	2542418	2543579	278881	279994	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC9.11	dad2	SPAC9.11	hos2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nakamichi N (2000)	11193425	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
676011	2541957	2542162	278444	278638	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC6F6.08c	plo1	cdc16	-	bub2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tanaka K (2001)	11250892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:wild type	mutation of cdc16 rescues septation defects in a plo1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
676063	2539650	2543573	276205	279988	SPBC1711.13	SPAC869.11	his2	cat1	-	SPAC922.08c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ryuko S (2012)	22806344	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	Cat1 overexpression suppressed the CoCl(2)-sensitive growth defect of the his2 mutants	-	BIOGRID
676066	2540060	2540589	276598	277115	SPBC106.01	SPBC20F10.06	mph1	mad2	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Heinrich S (2012)	22825872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	deletion of mad2 rescues growth of an mph1 mutant mis12 fusion	-	BIOGRID
676067	2538736	2540060	275320	276598	SPCC1322.12c	SPBC106.01	bub1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Heinrich S (2012)	22825872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution	double mutants show decreased localization of Ark1 to centromeres	-	BIOGRID
676068	2538736	2540320	275320	276850	SPCC1322.12c	SPBC3D6.04c	bub1	mad1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Heinrich S (2012)	22825872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
676069	2538736	2540589	275320	277115	SPCC1322.12c	SPBC20F10.06	bub1	mad2	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Heinrich S (2012)	22825872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
676070	2538736	2539219	275320	275789	SPCC1322.12c	SPCC1795.01c	bub1	mad3	-	SPCC895.02	Co-localization	physical	Heinrich S (2012)	22825872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
676071	2541856	2540320	278347	276850	SPAC23H3.08c	SPBC3D6.04c	bub3	mad1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Heinrich S (2012)	22825872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
676072	2541856	2540589	278347	277115	SPAC23H3.08c	SPBC20F10.06	bub3	mad2	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Heinrich S (2012)	22825872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
676073	2541856	2539219	278347	275789	SPAC23H3.08c	SPCC1795.01c	bub3	mad3	-	SPCC895.02	Co-localization	physical	Heinrich S (2012)	22825872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
676078	2540060	2538736	276598	275320	SPBC106.01	SPCC1322.12c	mph1	bub1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Co-localization	physical	Heinrich S (2012)	22825872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
676079	2540060	2540320	276598	276850	SPBC106.01	SPBC3D6.04c	mph1	mad1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Co-localization	physical	Heinrich S (2012)	22825872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
676080	2540060	3361036	276598	280112	SPBC106.01	SPCC320.13c	mph1	ark1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	Co-localization	physical	Heinrich S (2012)	22825872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
676081	2539219	2540320	275789	276850	SPCC1795.01c	SPBC3D6.04c	mad3	mad1	SPCC895.02	-	Co-localization	physical	Heinrich S (2012)	22825872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
676082	2539219	2540589	275789	277115	SPCC1795.01c	SPBC20F10.06	mad3	mad2	SPCC895.02	-	Co-localization	physical	Heinrich S (2012)	22825872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
676085	3361036	2540060	280112	276598	SPCC320.13c	SPBC106.01	ark1	mph1	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Co-localization	physical	Heinrich S (2012)	22825872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
676086	3361036	2538736	280112	275320	SPCC320.13c	SPCC1322.12c	ark1	bub1	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	-	Co-localization	physical	Heinrich S (2012)	22825872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
676087	3361036	2541856	280112	278347	SPCC320.13c	SPAC23H3.08c	ark1	bub3	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	-	Co-localization	physical	Heinrich S (2012)	22825872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
676088	3361036	2540320	280112	276850	SPCC320.13c	SPBC3D6.04c	ark1	mad1	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	-	Co-localization	physical	Heinrich S (2012)	22825872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
676089	3361036	2540589	280112	277115	SPCC320.13c	SPBC20F10.06	ark1	mad2	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	-	Co-localization	physical	Heinrich S (2012)	22825872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
676090	3361036	2539219	280112	275789	SPCC320.13c	SPCC1795.01c	ark1	mad3	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	SPCC895.02	Co-localization	physical	Heinrich S (2012)	22825872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
676091	2540060	2541856	276598	278347	SPBC106.01	SPAC23H3.08c	mph1	bub3	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Co-localization	physical	Heinrich S (2012)	22825872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
676092	2540060	2540589	276598	277115	SPBC106.01	SPBC20F10.06	mph1	mad2	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Co-localization	physical	Heinrich S (2012)	22825872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
676093	2540060	2539219	276598	275789	SPBC106.01	SPCC1795.01c	mph1	mad3	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPCC895.02	Co-localization	physical	Heinrich S (2012)	22825872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
676094	2538736	2541856	275320	278347	SPCC1322.12c	SPAC23H3.08c	bub1	bub3	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Heinrich S (2012)	22825872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
676095	2541856	2538736	278347	275320	SPAC23H3.08c	SPCC1322.12c	bub3	bub1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Heinrich S (2012)	22825872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
676096	2540320	2540589	276850	277115	SPBC3D6.04c	SPBC20F10.06	mad1	mad2	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Heinrich S (2012)	22825872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
676102	2538689	2543481	275274	279901	SPCC1795.11	SPAPB2B4.03	sum3	cig2	ded1|moc2|slh3	cyc17	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Grallert B (2000)	10725227	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of cig2 partially suppresses the rescue of cdc21 mutants by ded1-78	-	BIOGRID
676106	2539974	2540666	276518	277191	SPBC32H8.07	SPBC215.04	git5	git11	gpb1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Landry S (2001)	11238401	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
676109	2540666	2539974	277191	276518	SPBC215.04	SPBC32H8.07	git11	git5	-	gpb1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Landry S (2001)	11238401	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
676150	2540149	2542123	276686	278599	SPBC1289.03c	SPAC18G6.15	spi1	mal3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Fleig U (2000)	11086011	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology|chromosome segregation	increase in abnormal cell form and chromosome missegregation	-	BIOGRID
676192	2543082	2540727	279515	277250	SPAC3C7.08c	SPBC1921.03c	elf1	mex67	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kozak L (2002)	12110682	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
676193	2543082	2539077	279515	275649	SPAC3C7.08c	SPCC1739.14	elf1	npp106	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kozak L (2002)	12110682	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
676194	2543082	2541770	279515	278264	SPAC3C7.08c	SPAP27G11.10c	elf1	nup184	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kozak L (2002)	12110682	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
676195	2539497	2539505	276060	276068	SPCC895.07	SPCC736.14	alp14	dis1	mtc1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Garcia MA (2001)	11432827	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
676196	2539505	2539497	276068	276060	SPCC736.14	SPCC895.07	dis1	alp14	-	mtc1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Garcia MA (2001)	11432827	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
676198	2541022	2542293	277537	278761	SPBC3F6.05	SPAC17G8.14c	rga1	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nakano K (2001)	11737264	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
676199	2541022	2541612	277537	278109	SPBC3F6.05	SPAC1F7.04	rga1	rho1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nakano K (2001)	11737264	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
676201	2541612	2541022	278109	277537	SPAC1F7.04	SPBC3F6.05	rho1	rga1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nakano K (2001)	11737264	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
676202	2543351	2543421	279773	279843	SPAC8C9.03	SPAC3G9.14	cgs1	sak1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Wu SY (1995)	7862141	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:wild type	overexpression of sak1 restores conjugation in haploid cells and meiosis in diploid cells carrying a cgs1 or cgs2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
676203	2539207	2543421	275777	279843	SPCC285.09c	SPAC3G9.14	cgs2	sak1	pde1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Wu SY (1995)	7862141	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:wild type	overexpression of sak1 restores conjugation in haploid cells and meiosis in diploid cells carrying a cgs1 or cgs2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
676309	2539087	2543580	275659	279995	SPCC1259.13	SPAC644.14c	chk1	rad51	rad27	rhp51	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Smeets MF (2003)	12839619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of rhp51 rescues MMS sensitivity at 37 degrees in a checkpoint mutant	-	BIOGRID
676316	2542558	2540992	279014	277508	SPAC1952.07	SPBC342.05	rad1	crb2	rad19	rhp9	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Smeets MF (2003)	12839619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of crb2 rescues MMS sensitivity at 30 degrees in some checkpoint mutants	-	BIOGRID
676317	2543544	2540992	279961	277508	SPAC664.07c	SPBC342.05	rad9	crb2	-	rhp9	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Smeets MF (2003)	12839619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of crb2 rescues MMS sensitivity at 30 degrees in some checkpoint mutants	-	BIOGRID
676318	2541746	2540992	278240	277508	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC342.05	hus1	crb2	-	rhp9	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Smeets MF (2003)	12839619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of crb2 rescues MMS sensitivity at 30 degrees in some checkpoint mutants	-	BIOGRID
676319	2541643	2540992	278139	277508	SPAC14C4.13	SPBC342.05	rad17	crb2	-	rhp9	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Smeets MF (2003)	12839619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of crb2 rescues MMS sensitivity at 30 degrees in some checkpoint mutants	-	BIOGRID
676321	2543289	2540992	279714	277508	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC342.05	rad26	crb2	-	rhp9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Smeets MF (2003)	12839619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	overexpression of crb2 increases MMS sensitivity at 37 degrees in a rad26 mutant	-	BIOGRID
676328	2543580	2540992	279995	277508	SPAC644.14c	SPBC342.05	rad51	crb2	rhp51	rhp9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Smeets MF (2003)	12839619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionizing radiation resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to DNA damage	-	BIOGRID
676329	2543580	2539087	279995	275659	SPAC644.14c	SPCC1259.13	rad51	chk1	rhp51	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Smeets MF (2003)	12839619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionizing radiation resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to DNA damage	-	BIOGRID
676367	2540580	2541055	277106	277570	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC409.07c	ran1	wis1	pat1	smf2|spc2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Stettler S (1996)	8832415	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|mating efficiency:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	deletion of wis1 rescues temperature sensitive growth and hyper-conjugation phenotypes in a ran1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
676384	2540617	2542677	277143	279130	SPBC21C3.20c	SPAC26F1.10c	git1	pyp1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Dal Santo P (1996)	8832414	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:wild type	overexpression of pyp1 represses aberrant expression of the fbp1-ura4 reporter protein seen in PKA mutants	-	BIOGRID
676385	2540810	2542677	277329	279130	SPBC19C7.03	SPAC26F1.10c	cyr1	pyp1	git2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Dal Santo P (1996)	8832414	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue|protein/peptide accumulation:wild type	overexpression of pyp1 represses aberrant expression of the fbp1-ura4 reporter protein seen in PKA mutants	-	BIOGRID
676386	2538770	2542677	275353	279130	SPCC1753.02c	SPAC26F1.10c	git3	pyp1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Dal Santo P (1996)	8832414	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:wild type	overexpression of pyp1 represses aberrant expression of the fbp1-ura4 reporter protein seen in PKA mutants	-	BIOGRID
676387	2539974	2542677	276518	279130	SPBC32H8.07	SPAC26F1.10c	git5	pyp1	gpb1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Dal Santo P (1996)	8832414	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:wild type	overexpression of pyp1 represses aberrant expression of the fbp1-ura4 reporter protein seen in PKA mutants	-	BIOGRID
676388	2540962	2542677	277478	279130	SPBC36.12c	SPAC26F1.10c	git7	pyp1	SPBC713.01c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Dal Santo P (1996)	8832414	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:wild type	overexpression of pyp1 represses aberrant expression of the fbp1-ura4 reporter protein seen in PKA mutants	-	BIOGRID
676389	2543539	2542677	279956	279130	SPAC926.04c	SPAC26F1.10c	hsp90	pyp1	git10|swo1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Dal Santo P (1996)	8832414	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:wild type	overexpression of pyp1 represses aberrant expression of the fbp1-ura4 reporter protein seen in PKA mutants	-	BIOGRID
676390	2541720	2542677	278214	279130	SPAC23H3.13c	SPAC26F1.10c	gpa2	pyp1	git8	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Dal Santo P (1996)	8832414	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:wild type	overexpression of pyp1 represses aberrant expression of the fbp1-ura4 reporter protein seen in PKA mutants	-	BIOGRID
676391	2539781	2542677	276331	279130	SPBC106.10	SPAC26F1.10c	pka1	pyp1	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Dal Santo P (1996)	8832414	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue|protein/peptide accumulation:wild type|sexual cycle:partial rescue	overexpression of pyp1 represses aberrant expression of the fbp1-ura4 reporter protein seen in PKA mutants|overexpression of pyp1 suppresses unregulated sexual development in a pka1 mutant strain	-	BIOGRID
676392	2540810	2542200	277329	278675	SPBC19C7.03	SPAC19D5.01	cyr1	pyp2	git2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Dal Santo P (1996)	8832414	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue	overexpression of pyp2 represses aberrant expression of the fbp1-ura4 reporter protein seen in PKA mutants	-	BIOGRID
676393	2539781	2542200	276331	278675	SPBC106.10	SPAC19D5.01	pka1	pyp2	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Dal Santo P (1996)	8832414	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue	overexpression of pyp2 represses aberrant expression of the fbp1-ura4 reporter protein seen in PKA mutants	-	BIOGRID
676394	2541592	2542045	278089	278526	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC23C11.12	cut9	hcn1	dre1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yamada H (1997)	9264466	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
676395	2541592	2539781	278089	276331	SPAC6F12.15c	SPBC106.10	cut9	pka1	dre1	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Yamada H (1997)	9264466	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	double mutants are able to form colonies at lower temperatures	-	BIOGRID
676416	2542175	2539920	278650	276464	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC119.08	mkh1	pmk1	-	spm1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Sengar AS (1997)	9199286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of pmk1 partially rescues growth on potassium chloride in an mkh1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
676417	2539649	2539920	276204	276464	SPBC12D12.04c	SPBC119.08	pck2	pmk1	pkc1|sts6	spm1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Sengar AS (1997)	9199286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of pmk1 partially rescues growth on potassium chloride in a pck2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
676418	2542175	2539649	278650	276204	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC12D12.04c	mkh1	pck2	-	pkc1|sts6	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sengar AS (1997)	9199286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	double mutants show decreased sensitivity to beta-glucanase	-	BIOGRID
676419	2542175	2542293	278650	278761	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC17G8.14c	mkh1	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sengar AS (1997)	9199286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	double mutants show decreased sensitivity to beta-glucanase	-	BIOGRID
676420	2542175	2541055	278650	277570	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC409.07c	mkh1	wis1	-	smf2|spc2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sengar AS (1997)	9199286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	double mutants show decreased sensitivity to beta-glucanase	-	BIOGRID
676421	2542175	2541652	278650	278148	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC24B11.06c	mkh1	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sengar AS (1997)	9199286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	double mutants show decreased sensitivity to beta-glucanase	-	BIOGRID
676422	2542175	2539920	278650	276464	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC119.08	mkh1	pmk1	-	spm1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sengar AS (1997)	9199286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	double mutants show decreased sensitivity to beta-glucanase	-	BIOGRID
676423	2539649	2541055	276204	277570	SPBC12D12.04c	SPBC409.07c	pck2	wis1	pkc1|sts6	smf2|spc2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sengar AS (1997)	9199286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	double mutants show decreased sensitivity to beta-glucanase	-	BIOGRID
676424	2539649	2541652	276204	278148	SPBC12D12.04c	SPAC24B11.06c	pck2	sty1	pkc1|sts6	phh1|spc1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sengar AS (1997)	9199286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	double mutants show decreased sensitivity to beta-glucanase	-	BIOGRID
676425	2539649	2539920	276204	276464	SPBC12D12.04c	SPBC119.08	pck2	pmk1	pkc1|sts6	spm1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sengar AS (1997)	9199286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	double mutants show decreased sensitivity to beta-glucanase	-	BIOGRID
676426	2539649	2542175	276204	278650	SPBC12D12.04c	SPAC1F3.02c	pck2	mkh1	pkc1|sts6	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sengar AS (1997)	9199286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	deletion of mkh1 rescues growth in a pck2 overexpression mutant	-	BIOGRID
676427	2542175	2541055	278650	277570	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC409.07c	mkh1	wis1	-	smf2|spc2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sengar AS (1997)	9199286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology	-	-	BIOGRID
676428	2541620	2539087	278117	275659	SPAC2G11.12	SPCC1259.13	rqh1	chk1	hus2|rad12|rec9	rad27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Murray JM (1997)	9372918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	double mutants show increased sensitivity to UV radiation	-	BIOGRID
676429	2541153	2541871	277668	278361	SPBC725.16	SPAC22F3.09c	res1	res2	sct1	mcs1|pct1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sturm S (1996)	8970158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:partial rescue	internally truncated forms of Res2 lacking the centrally located ankyrin repeats and adjacent sequences can partially suppress the meiotic defect in res1 mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
676430	2540341	2541153	276870	277668	SPBC2F12.11c	SPBC725.16	rep2	res1	-	sct1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sturm S (1996)	8970158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:partial rescue	internally truncated forms of Res2 lacking the centrally located ankyrin repeats and adjacent sequences can partially suppress the meiotic defect in res1 mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
676431	2540341	2541153	276870	277668	SPBC2F12.11c	SPBC725.16	rep2	res1	-	sct1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Sturm S (1996)	8970158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
676432	2540341	2541871	276870	278361	SPBC2F12.11c	SPAC22F3.09c	rep2	res2	-	mcs1|pct1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Sturm S (1996)	8970158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
676433	2542967	2540345	279407	276874	SPAC12B10.12c	SPBC19C7.09c	rhp41	uve1	rhp4a	uvde	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Marti TM (2003)	12807767	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	deletion of uve1 increases sensitivity to UV radiation in an rhp41/rhp42 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
676434	2539465	2540345	276028	276874	SPCC4G3.10c	SPBC19C7.09c	rhp42	uve1	rhp4b	uvde	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Marti TM (2003)	12807767	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	deletion of uve1 increases sensitivity to UV radiation in an rhp41/rhp42 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
676435	2539094	2539473	275666	276036	SPCC330.02	SPCP25A2.02c	rhp7	rhp26	SPCC613.14	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Marti TM (2003)	12807767	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	double mutants show increased sensitivity to UV	-	BIOGRID
676436	2539465	2539094	276028	275666	SPCC4G3.10c	SPCC330.02	rhp42	rhp7	rhp4b	SPCC613.14	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Marti TM (2003)	12807767	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	double mutants show increased sensitivity to UV	-	BIOGRID
676437	2539094	2540345	275666	276874	SPCC330.02	SPBC19C7.09c	rhp7	uve1	SPCC613.14	uvde	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Marti TM (2003)	12807767	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	deletion of uve1 increases sensitivity to UV in an rhp7/rhp41 double mutant background|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
676438	2542967	2540345	279407	276874	SPAC12B10.12c	SPBC19C7.09c	rhp41	uve1	rhp4a	uvde	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Marti TM (2003)	12807767	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	deletion of uve1 increases sensitivity to UV in an rhp7/rhp41 double mutant background|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
676439	2539465	2540345	276028	276874	SPCC4G3.10c	SPBC19C7.09c	rhp42	uve1	rhp4b	uvde	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Marti TM (2003)	12807767	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	deletion of uve1 increases sensitivity to UV in an rhp42/rhp26 double mutant background|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
676440	2539473	2540345	276036	276874	SPCP25A2.02c	SPBC19C7.09c	rhp26	uve1	-	uvde	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Marti TM (2003)	12807767	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	deletion of uve1 increases sensitivity to UV in an rhp42/rhp26 double mutant background|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
676441	2539997	2542635	276541	279089	SPBC1604.14c	SPAC24H6.09	shk1	gef1	orb2|pak1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Coll PM (2003)	12529446	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:undetermined|heat sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	overproduction of Gef1p not only corrected the morphologic phenotypes of either orb2 or orb6 mutants but also improved growth of these strains at high temperatures	-	BIOGRID
676442	2543441	2542635	279861	279089	SPAC821.12	SPAC24H6.09	orb6	gef1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Coll PM (2003)	12529446	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:undetermined|heat sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	overproduction of Gef1p not only corrected the morphologic phenotypes of either orb2 or orb6 mutants but also improved growth of these strains at high temperatures	-	BIOGRID
676443	2539997	2542337	276541	278803	SPBC1604.14c	SPAC16E8.09	shk1	scd1	orb2|pak1	ral1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Coll PM (2003)	12529446	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	overexpression of scd1 exacerbates growth defects in orb2 and orb6 mutants	-	BIOGRID
676444	2543441	2542337	279861	278803	SPAC821.12	SPAC16E8.09	orb6	scd1	-	ral1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Coll PM (2003)	12529446	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	overexpression of scd1 exacerbates growth defects in orb2 and orb6 mutants	-	BIOGRID
676445	2539377	2543520	275943	279938	SPCC825.03c	SPAC607.10	psy1	spo3	sso1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamura T (2001)	11739793	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
676935	2539881	2541620	276427	278117	SPBC16G5.12c	SPAC2G11.12	top3	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Oh M (2002)	12235386	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	deletion of rqh1 rescues viability of a top3 mutant	-	BIOGRID
676950	2540903	2539195	277419	275766	SPBC530.05	SPCC18B5.01c	prt1	bfr1	SPBC530.05	SPCPJ732.04c|hba2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kawashima SA (2012)	22840777	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	brefeldin A, cycloheximide, Purvalanol A	-	BIOGRID
676951	2539195	2542190	275766	278665	SPCC18B5.01c	SPAC17C9.16c	bfr1	mfs1	SPCPJ732.04c|hba2	SPAC17C9.16c|SPAC9E9.16	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kawashima SA (2012)	22840777	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	brefeldin A, cycloheximide, Purvalanol A	-	BIOGRID
676952	2539195	2540940	275766	277456	SPCC18B5.01c	SPBC36.03c	bfr1	mfs3	SPCPJ732.04c|hba2	SPBC36.03c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kawashima SA (2012)	22840777	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	cycloheximide, Purvalanol A	-	BIOGRID
676953	2539195	2540940	275766	277456	SPCC18B5.01c	SPBC36.03c	bfr1	mfs3	SPCPJ732.04c|hba2	SPBC36.03c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kawashima SA (2012)	22840777	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	brefeldin A	-	BIOGRID
676954	2542190	2541116	278665	277631	SPAC17C9.16c	SPBC609.04	mfs1	caf5	SPAC17C9.16c|SPAC9E9.16	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kawashima SA (2012)	22840777	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	brefeldin A	-	BIOGRID
676956	2542250	2539415	278720	275980	SPAC17D4.03c	SPCC63.02c	cis4	aah3	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Jaiseng W (2012)	22848669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression partially rescues sensitivity to MgCl2 and FK506	-	BIOGRID
676957	2542250	2540552	278720	277079	SPAC17D4.03c	SPBC1E8.05	cis4	SPBC1E8.05	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Jaiseng W (2012)	22848669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression partially rescues sensitivity to MgCl2 and FK506	-	BIOGRID
676958	2542250	3361538	278720	280614	SPAC17D4.03c	SPAC1705.03c	cis4	ecm33	-	SPAC23H4.19|SPAC1F2.01	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Jaiseng W (2012)	22848669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression partially rescues sensitivity to MgCl2 and FK506	-	BIOGRID
676959	3361538	2539415	280614	275980	SPAC1705.03c	SPCC63.02c	ecm33	aah3	SPAC23H4.19|SPAC1F2.01	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Jaiseng W (2012)	22848669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression partially rescues sensitivity to MgCl2	-	BIOGRID
676960	3361538	2540552	280614	277079	SPAC1705.03c	SPBC1E8.05	ecm33	SPBC1E8.05	SPAC23H4.19|SPAC1F2.01	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Jaiseng W (2012)	22848669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression partially rescues sensitivity to MgCl2	-	BIOGRID
676961	3361538	2542250	280614	278720	SPAC1705.03c	SPAC17D4.03c	ecm33	cis4	SPAC23H4.19|SPAC1F2.01	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Jaiseng W (2012)	22848669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression partially rescues sensitivity to MgCl2	-	BIOGRID
676962	2542250	2541199	278720	277713	SPAC17D4.03c	SPBC839.08c	cis4	its8	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Jaiseng W (2012)	22848669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
676963	2542250	2540019	278720	276563	SPAC17D4.03c	SPBC1685.01	cis4	pmp1	-	dsp1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Jaiseng W (2012)	22848669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression partially rescues sensitivity to MgCl2	-	BIOGRID
676964	2542250	2539071	278720	275643	SPAC17D4.03c	SPCC1322.03	cis4	trp1322	-	SPCC1322.03	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Jaiseng W (2012)	22848669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression partially rescues sensitivity to MgCl2	-	BIOGRID
676965	2541306	3361538	277818	280614	SPBP16F5.07	SPAC1705.03c	apm1	ecm33	-	SPAC23H4.19|SPAC1F2.01	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Jaiseng W (2012)	22848669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression partially rescues sensitivity to MgCl2	-	BIOGRID
676966	2541306	2539071	277818	275643	SPBP16F5.07	SPCC1322.03	apm1	trp1322	-	SPCC1322.03	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Jaiseng W (2012)	22848669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression partially rescues sensitivity to MgCl2	-	BIOGRID
676967	2541306	2540552	277818	277079	SPBP16F5.07	SPBC1E8.05	apm1	SPBC1E8.05	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Jaiseng W (2012)	22848669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression partially rescues sensitivity to MgCl2	-	BIOGRID
676968	2541306	2540019	277818	276563	SPBP16F5.07	SPBC1685.01	apm1	pmp1	-	dsp1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Jaiseng W (2012)	22848669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression partially rescues sensitivity to MgCl2	-	BIOGRID
676974	2539087	2540032	275659	276575	SPCC1259.13	SPBC1703.14c	chk1	top1	rad27	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Wan S (1999)	10407262	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	deletion of top1 rescues the sensitivity to camptothecin in a chk1 mutant background	-	BIOGRID
676975	2542558	2540032	279014	276575	SPAC1952.07	SPBC1703.14c	rad1	top1	rad19	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Wan S (1999)	10407262	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of top1 rescues the sensitivity to camptothecin in a rad1 mutant background	-	BIOGRID
676976	2539505	2540494	276068	277022	SPCC736.14	SPBC409.04c	dis1	mis12	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Goshima G (1999)	10398680	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of mis12 partially rescues the cold sensitivity of a dis1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
677090	2540312	2539720	276842	276273	SPBC31F10.08	SPBC1711.14	mde2	rec15	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miyoshi T (2012)	22841486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677091	2541688	2539720	278184	276273	SPAC25G10.04c	SPBC1711.14	rec10	rec15	rec20	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miyoshi T (2012)	22841486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677092	2542150	2540221	278626	276754	SPAC17A5.11	SPBC32F12.02	rec12	rec14	spo11	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miyoshi T (2012)	22841486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	yeast 3-hybrid with Rec6	-	BIOGRID
677093	2540221	2540312	276754	276842	SPBC32F12.02	SPBC31F10.08	rec14	mde2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miyoshi T (2012)	22841486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677094	2539720	2540312	276273	276842	SPBC1711.14	SPBC31F10.08	rec15	mde2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miyoshi T (2012)	22841486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677095	2539720	2541688	276273	278184	SPBC1711.14	SPAC25G10.04c	rec15	rec10	-	rec20	Two-hybrid	physical	Miyoshi T (2012)	22841486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677096	2539720	2539720	276273	276273	SPBC1711.14	SPBC1711.14	rec15	rec15	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miyoshi T (2012)	22841486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677097	2542618	2539330	279072	275896	SPAC1952.15c	SPCC1753.03c	rec24	rec7	mug6	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miyoshi T (2012)	22841486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677098	2540588	2542150	277114	278626	SPBC21B10.12	SPAC17A5.11	rec6	rec12	-	spo11	Two-hybrid	physical	Miyoshi T (2012)	22841486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	yeast 3-hybrid with Rec14	-	BIOGRID
677099	2539330	2542618	275896	279072	SPCC1753.03c	SPAC1952.15c	rec7	rec24	-	mug6	Two-hybrid	physical	Miyoshi T (2012)	22841486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677100	2539330	2539330	275896	275896	SPCC1753.03c	SPCC1753.03c	rec7	rec7	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miyoshi T (2012)	22841486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677101	2540312	2540221	276842	276754	SPBC31F10.08	SPBC32F12.02	mde2	rec14	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Miyoshi T (2012)	22841486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677102	2542150	2540221	278626	276754	SPAC17A5.11	SPBC32F12.02	rec12	rec14	spo11	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Miyoshi T (2012)	22841486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677103	2540221	2542150	276754	278626	SPBC32F12.02	SPAC17A5.11	rec14	rec12	-	spo11	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Miyoshi T (2012)	22841486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677104	2539720	2540312	276273	276842	SPBC1711.14	SPBC31F10.08	rec15	mde2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Miyoshi T (2012)	22841486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677105	2539720	2542618	276273	279072	SPBC1711.14	SPAC1952.15c	rec15	rec24	-	mug6	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Miyoshi T (2012)	22841486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677106	2539720	2539330	276273	275896	SPBC1711.14	SPCC1753.03c	rec15	rec7	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Miyoshi T (2012)	22841486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677108	2540588	2542150	277114	278626	SPBC21B10.12	SPAC17A5.11	rec6	rec12	-	spo11	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Miyoshi T (2012)	22841486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677110	2539330	2539720	275896	276273	SPCC1753.03c	SPBC1711.14	rec7	rec15	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Miyoshi T (2012)	22841486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677111	2539330	2542618	275896	279072	SPCC1753.03c	SPAC1952.15c	rec7	rec24	-	mug6	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Miyoshi T (2012)	22841486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677112	2540312	2540221	276842	276754	SPBC31F10.08	SPBC32F12.02	mde2	rec14	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Miyoshi T (2012)	22841486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677113	2541688	2539720	278184	276273	SPAC25G10.04c	SPBC1711.14	rec10	rec15	rec20	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Miyoshi T (2012)	22841486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677114	2542618	2539720	279072	276273	SPAC1952.15c	SPBC1711.14	rec24	rec15	mug6	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Miyoshi T (2012)	22841486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677115	2542618	2539330	279072	275896	SPAC1952.15c	SPCC1753.03c	rec24	rec7	mug6	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Miyoshi T (2012)	22841486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677159	2540392	2540589	276920	277115	SPBC365.15	SPBC20F10.06	alp4	mad2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Vardy L (2000)	11080156	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	thiabendazole	-	BIOGRID
677160	2540128	2539123	276665	275695	SPBC15D4.03	SPCC18B5.03	slm9	wee1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kanoh J (2000)	10835386	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology:undetermined	suppresses cell elongation phenotype	-	BIOGRID
677161	2540128	2542632	276665	279086	SPBC15D4.03	SPAC24H6.05	slm9	cdc25	-	sal2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kanoh J (2000)	10835386	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:undetermined|cellular morphology:undetermined	cdc25 overexpression suppresses slm9 mutant mitotic delay and cell elongation defect|data not shown	-	BIOGRID
677284	2541372	2543116	277883	279548	SPBP8B7.28c	SPAC3A11.08	stc1	pcu4	-	Cul-4|cul4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2010)	20211136	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677285	2541372	2539050	277883	275623	SPBP8B7.28c	SPCC11E10.08	stc1	rik1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2010)	20211136	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677286	2541372	2538848	277883	275429	SPBP8B7.28c	SPCC613.12c	stc1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2010)	20211136	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677287	2541372	2539420	277883	275985	SPBP8B7.28c	SPCC970.07c	stc1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2010)	20211136	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677288	2541372	2540129	277883	276666	SPBP8B7.28c	SPBC12D12.08c	stc1	ned8	-	SPBC24C6.01c|nedd8|ubl1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2010)	20211136	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677289	2541372	2539671	277883	276226	SPBP8B7.28c	SPBC1734.11	stc1	mas5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2010)	20211136	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677290	2541372	2541087	277883	277602	SPBP8B7.28c	SPBC646.10c	stc1	SPBC646.10c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2010)	20211136	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677291	2541372	2542121	277883	278597	SPBP8B7.28c	SPAC17H9.05	stc1	ebp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2010)	20211136	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677292	2541372	2541814	277883	278305	SPBP8B7.28c	SPAC23G3.06	stc1	SPAC23G3.06	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2010)	20211136	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677293	2541372	2542269	277883	278738	SPBP8B7.28c	SPAC1F12.07	stc1	SPAC1F12.07	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2010)	20211136	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677294	2541372	2541372	277883	277883	SPBP8B7.28c	SPBP8B7.28c	stc1	stc1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2010)	20211136	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677295	2541372	2538848	277883	275429	SPBP8B7.28c	SPCC613.12c	stc1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bayne EH (2010)	20211136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677297	2542239	2542198	278711	278673	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC6F12.09	chp1	rdp1	-	rdr1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bayne EH (2010)	20211136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	only in the presence of stc1 and dcr1	-	BIOGRID
677299	2539420	2538848	275985	275429	SPCC970.07c	SPCC613.12c	raf2	raf1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bayne EH (2010)	20211136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677300	2539050	2538848	275623	275429	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC613.12c	rik1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bayne EH (2010)	20211136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677301	2541372	2539403	277883	275968	SPBP8B7.28c	SPCC736.11	stc1	ago1	-	csp9	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Bayne EH (2010)	20211136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
677302	2541372	2540825	277883	277343	SPBP8B7.28c	SPBC428.08c	stc1	clr4	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bayne EH (2010)	20211136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	maintenance of TetRoff-Stc1-mediated silencing is dependent on Clr4, the other CLRC subunits Rik1, Dos1, and Dos2, and the H3K9 deacetylase Sir2	-	BIOGRID
677303	2541372	2539050	277883	275623	SPBP8B7.28c	SPCC11E10.08	stc1	rik1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bayne EH (2010)	20211136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	maintenance of TetRoff-Stc1-mediated silencing is dependent on Clr4, the other CLRC subunits Rik1, Dos1, and Dos2, and the H3K9 deacetylase Sir2	-	BIOGRID
677304	2541372	2538848	277883	275429	SPBP8B7.28c	SPCC613.12c	stc1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bayne EH (2010)	20211136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	maintenance of TetRoff-Stc1-mediated silencing is dependent on Clr4, the other CLRC subunits Rik1, Dos1, and Dos2, and the H3K9 deacetylase Sir2	-	BIOGRID
677305	2541372	2539420	277883	275985	SPBP8B7.28c	SPCC970.07c	stc1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bayne EH (2010)	20211136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	maintenance of TetRoff-Stc1-mediated silencing is dependent on Clr4, the other CLRC subunits Rik1, Dos1, and Dos2, and the H3K9 deacetylase Sir2	-	BIOGRID
677306	2541372	3361342	277883	280418	SPBP8B7.28c	SPBC16D10.07c	stc1	sir2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bayne EH (2010)	20211136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	maintenance of TetRoff-Stc1-mediated silencing is dependent on Clr4, the other CLRC subunits Rik1, Dos1, and Dos2, and the H3K9 deacetylase Sir2	-	BIOGRID
677307	2540825	2539050	277343	275623	SPBC428.08c	SPCC11E10.08	clr4	rik1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bayne EH (2010)	20211136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	maintenance of GBD-Clr4-delta-cd-mediated silencing requires CLRC components	-	BIOGRID
677308	2540825	2538848	277343	275429	SPBC428.08c	SPCC613.12c	clr4	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bayne EH (2010)	20211136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	maintenance of GBD-Clr4-delta-cd-mediated silencing requires CLRC components	-	BIOGRID
677309	2540825	2539420	277343	275985	SPBC428.08c	SPCC970.07c	clr4	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bayne EH (2010)	20211136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	maintenance of GBD-Clr4-delta-cd-mediated silencing requires CLRC components	-	BIOGRID
677310	2540825	2541372	277343	277883	SPBC428.08c	SPBP8B7.28c	clr4	stc1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bayne EH (2010)	20211136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	Stc1 is required for establishment of GBD-Clr4-delta-cd-mediated silencing	-	BIOGRID
677356	2540307	2539640	276837	276195	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC32F12.09	apc10	rum1	SPBC1E8.06	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kominami K (1998)	9736616	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sterile:partial rescue	Overexpression of Rum1 suppresses sterile phenotype of apc10 mutants (multiple alleles)	-	BIOGRID
677357	2540307	2543481	276837	279901	SPBC1A4.01	SPAPB2B4.03	apc10	cig2	SPBC1E8.06	cyc17	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kominami K (1998)	9736616	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sterile:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
677493	2538758	2542052	275341	278531	SPCC1739.12	SPAC823.15	ppe1	ppa1	esp1|ppx1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Shimanuki M (1993)	8387356	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
677494	2538758	2540072	275341	276610	SPCC1739.12	SPBC16H5.07c	ppe1	ppa2	esp1|ppx1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Shimanuki M (1993)	8387356	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
677495	2538758	2540398	275341	276926	SPCC1739.12	SPBC26H8.10	ppe1	dis3	esp1|ppx1	rrp44	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Shimanuki M (1993)	8387356	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
677497	2538758	2542293	275341	278761	SPCC1739.12	SPAC17G8.14c	ppe1	pck1	esp1|ppx1	SPAC22H10.01c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Shimanuki M (1993)	8387356	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
677498	2540719	2541051	277242	277566	SPBC216.05	SPBC3E7.08c	rad3	rad13	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yasuhira S (1999)	10480889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
677556	2542237	2540060	278709	276598	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC106.01	fin1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Grallert A (2002)	12065422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
677557	2542237	2539123	278709	275695	SPAC19E9.02	SPCC18B5.03	fin1	wee1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Grallert A (2002)	12065422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spindle morphology:undetermined	reduced spindle formation defect	-	BIOGRID
677558	2542237	2542632	278709	279086	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC24H6.05	fin1	cdc25	-	sal2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Grallert A (2002)	12065422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spindle morphology:undetermined	reduced spindle formation defect	-	BIOGRID
677559	2542237	2539869	278709	276415	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC11B10.09	fin1	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Grallert A (2002)	12065422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spindle morphology:undetermined	reduced spindle formation defect	-	BIOGRID
677770	2539686	2541051	276241	277566	SPBC1734.06	SPBC3E7.08c	rhp18	rad13	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Verkade HM (2001)	11523791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	UV sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
677771	2539686	2540345	276241	276874	SPBC1734.06	SPBC19C7.09c	rhp18	uve1	-	uvde	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Verkade HM (2001)	11523791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	UV sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
677772	2539686	2541620	276241	278117	SPBC1734.06	SPAC2G11.12	rhp18	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Verkade HM (2001)	11523791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|gamma ray resistance|vegetative growth	UV sensitivity|gamma radiation	-	BIOGRID
677773	2539686	2543580	276241	279995	SPBC1734.06	SPAC644.14c	rhp18	rad51	-	rhp51	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Verkade HM (2001)	11523791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	UV sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
677774	2539686	2540719	276241	277242	SPBC1734.06	SPBC216.05	rhp18	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Verkade HM (2001)	11523791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	UV sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
677775	2539686	2539087	276241	275659	SPBC1734.06	SPCC1259.13	rhp18	chk1	-	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Verkade HM (2001)	11523791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|gamma ray resistance|vegetative growth	UV sensitivity|gamma radiation	-	BIOGRID
677776	2539686	2542622	276241	279076	SPBC1734.06	SPAC18B11.07c	rhp18	rhp6	-	sng1|ubc2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Verkade HM (2001)	11523791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|gamma ray resistance|vegetative growth	UV sensitivity|gamma radiation	-	BIOGRID
677777	2539686	2543580	276241	279995	SPBC1734.06	SPAC644.14c	rhp18	rad51	-	rhp51	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Verkade HM (2001)	11523791	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	gamma ray resistance:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	gamma radiation	-	BIOGRID
677778	2541051	2542582	277566	279037	SPBC3E7.08c	SPAC19G12.02c	rad13	pms1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kunz C (2001)	11800554	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency	-	-	BIOGRID
679884	2539047	2540051	275620	276589	SPCC1223.06	SPBC32H8.12c	tea1	act1	alp8	cps8|pi012	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679885	2539047	2538902	275620	275480	SPCC1223.06	SPCC13B11.01	tea1	adh1	alp8	adh	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679886	2539047	2539054	275620	275627	SPCC1223.06	SPCC330.08	tea1	alg11	alp8	gmd3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679887	2539047	2539497	275620	276060	SPCC1223.06	SPCC895.07	tea1	alp14	alp8	mtc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679888	2539047	2540900	275620	277416	SPCC1223.06	SPBC530.10c	tea1	anc1	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679889	2539047	2540737	275620	277260	SPCC1223.06	SPBC19G7.05c	tea1	bgs1	alp8	cps1|drc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679890	2539047	2542591	275620	279046	SPCC1223.06	SPAC19B12.03	tea1	bgs3	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679891	2539047	2538822	275620	275403	SPCC1223.06	SPCC1840.02c	tea1	bgs4	alp8	cwg1|orb11|pbr1|sph1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679892	2539047	2541815	275620	278306	SPCC1223.06	SPAC22A12.15c	tea1	bip1	alp8	bip	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679893	2539047	2540390	275620	276918	SPCC1223.06	SPBC31E1.06	tea1	bms1	alp8	SPBC800.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679894	2539047	2542756	275620	279206	SPCC1223.06	SPAC15A10.16	tea1	bud6	alp8	SPAC15E1.01|aip3|fat1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679895	2539047	2541038	275620	277553	SPCC1223.06	SPBC29A10.01	tea1	ccr1	alp8	SPBC365.17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679896	2539047	2540567	275620	277094	SPCC1223.06	SPBC1A4.08c	tea1	cct3	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679897	2539047	2540053	275620	276591	SPCC1223.06	SPBC106.06	tea1	cct4	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679898	2539047	2541695	275620	278191	SPCC1223.06	SPAC1F7.05	tea1	cdc22	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679899	2539047	2541699	275620	278195	SPCC1223.06	SPAP8A3.08	tea1	cdc4	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679900	2539047	2542744	275620	279194	SPCC1223.06	SPAC1565.08	tea1	cdc48	alp8	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679901	2539047	2541972	275620	278457	SPCC1223.06	SPAC23C11.11	tea1	cka1	alp8	orb5	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679902	2539047	2542564	275620	279020	SPCC1223.06	SPAC1851.03	tea1	ckb1	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679903	2539047	2542395	275620	278859	SPCC1223.06	SPAC1805.05	tea1	cki3	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679904	2539047	2541982	275620	278467	SPCC1223.06	SPAC23A1.06c	tea1	cmk2	alp8	mkp2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679905	2539047	2543041	275620	279476	SPCC1223.06	SPAC3C7.11c	tea1	cnx1	alp8	cal1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679906	2539047	2543298	275620	279723	SPCC1223.06	SPAC6B12.15	tea1	cpc2	alp8	rkp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679907	2539047	2539426	275620	275991	SPCC1223.06	SPCC962.03c	tea1	cut15	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679908	2539047	2543344	275620	279766	SPCC1223.06	SPAC56E4.04c	tea1	cut6	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679909	2539047	2539048	275620	275621	SPCC1223.06	SPCC1223.08c	tea1	dfr1	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679910	2539047	2539035	275620	275608	SPCC1223.06	SPCC794.09c	tea1	tef101	alp8	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679911	2539047	2541984	275620	278469	SPCC1223.06	SPAC23A1.10	tea1	tef102	alp8	ef1a-b|ef1a-d|efa1|SPBC24E9.15c|tef1-b|tef1-d	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679912	2539047	2539917	275620	276461	SPCC1223.06	SPBC839.15c	tea1	tef103	alp8	ef1a-c|ef1-b|efa13	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679913	2539047	3361483	275620	280559	SPCC1223.06	SPAC513.01c	tea1	eft201	alp8	SPAPYUK71.04c|eft2-1|etf2|eft2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679914	2539047	2539544	275620	276105	SPCC1223.06	SPCP31B10.07	tea1	eft202	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679915	2539047	2543082	275620	279515	SPCC1223.06	SPAC3C7.08c	tea1	elf1	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679916	2539047	2539782	275620	276332	SPCC1223.06	SPBC1815.01	tea1	eno101	alp8	eno1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679917	2539047	2542599	275620	279053	SPCC1223.06	SPAC13A11.02c	tea1	erg11	alp8	cyp51	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679918	2539047	2543497	275620	279916	SPCC1223.06	SPAC926.09c	tea1	fas1	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679919	2539047	2540479	275620	277007	SPCC1223.06	SPBC2D10.10c	tea1	fib1	alp8	fib|nop1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679920	2539047	2539345	275620	275911	SPCC1223.06	SPCC18.18c	tea1	fum1	alp8	SPCC290.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679921	2539047	2542869	275620	279314	SPCC1223.06	SPAC140.02	tea1	gar2	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679922	2539047	2540455	275620	276983	SPCC1223.06	SPBC215.05	tea1	gpd1	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679923	2539047	2540975	275620	277491	SPCC1223.06	SPBC354.12	tea1	gpd3	alp8	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679924	2539047	2542085	275620	278562	SPCC1223.06	SPAC26F1.06	tea1	gpm1	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679925	2539047	2541934	275620	278422	SPCC1223.06	SPAC222.11	tea1	hem13	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679926	2539047	2541200	275620	277714	SPCC1223.06	SPBC8D2.03c	tea1	hhf2	alp8	ams3|h4.2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679927	2539047	2542463	275620	278924	SPCC1223.06	SPAC1834.03c	tea1	hhf1	alp8	h4.1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679928	2539047	2539650	275620	276205	SPCC1223.06	SPBC1711.13	tea1	his2	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679929	2539047	2540977	275620	277493	SPCC1223.06	SPBC3E7.02c	tea1	hsp16	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679930	2539047	2543539	275620	279956	SPCC1223.06	SPAC926.04c	tea1	hsp90	alp8	git10|swo1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679931	2539047	2542634	275620	279088	SPCC1223.06	SPAC24H6.04	tea1	hxk1	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679932	2539047	2541894	275620	278384	SPCC1223.06	SPAC11G7.03	tea1	idh1	alp8	glu3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679933	2539047	2541345	275620	277856	SPCC1223.06	SPBP35G2.07	tea1	ilv1	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679934	2539047	2540792	275620	277311	SPCC1223.06	SPBC4F6.06	tea1	kin1	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679935	2539047	3361415	275620	280491	SPCC1223.06	SPAC21E11.08	tea1	lcb2	alp8	SPAC2C4.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679936	2539047	2540283	275620	276814	SPCC1223.06	SPBC1A4.02c	tea1	leu1	alp8	SPBC1E8.07c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679937	2539047	2543296	275620	279721	SPCC1223.06	SPAC9E9.03	tea1	leu2	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679938	2539047	2539815	275620	276365	SPCC1223.06	SPBC1105.02c	tea1	lys4	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679939	2539047	2542123	275620	278599	SPCC1223.06	SPAC18G6.15	tea1	mal3	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679940	2539047	2543131	275620	279563	SPCC1223.06	SPAC12G12.04	tea1	mcp60	alp8	hsp60	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679941	2539047	2540894	275620	277410	SPCC1223.06	SPBC530.04	tea1	mod5	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679942	2539047	2538743	275620	275326	SPCC1223.06	SPCC1906.01	tea1	mpg1	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679943	2539047	2539467	275620	276030	SPCC1223.06	SPCC417.07c	tea1	mto1	alp8	mbo1|mod20	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679944	2539047	2543576	275620	279991	SPCC1223.06	SPAC4A8.05c	tea1	myp2	alp8	myo3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679945	2539047	2541126	275620	277641	SPCC1223.06	SPBC651.01c	tea1	nog1	alp8	SPBC725.18c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679946	2539047	2541505	275620	278007	SPCC1223.06	SPAC57A7.04c	tea1	pabp	alp8	pab1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679947	2539047	2539861	275620	276408	SPCC1223.06	SPBC16C6.06	tea1	vps10	alp8	pep1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679948	2539047	2539972	275620	276516	SPCC1223.06	SPBC16H5.02	tea1	pfk1	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679949	2539047	2539764	275620	276315	SPCC1223.06	SPBC14F5.04c	tea1	pgk1	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679950	2539047	2542664	275620	279117	SPCC1223.06	SPAC1071.10c	tea1	pma1	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679951	2539047	2541674	275620	278170	SPCC1223.06	SPAC1556.07	tea1	pmm1	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679952	2539047	2540645	275620	277170	SPCC1223.06	SPBC21B10.05c	tea1	pop3	alp8	wat1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679953	2539047	2542776	275620	279225	SPCC1223.06	SPAC167.01	tea1	ire1	alp8	ppk4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679954	2539047	2543410	275620	279832	SPCC1223.06	SPAC821.11	tea1	pro1	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679955	2539047	2540057	275620	276595	SPCC1223.06	SPBC16H5.10c	tea1	prp43	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679956	2539047	3361514	275620	280590	SPCC1223.06	SPAC110.04c	tea1	pss1	alp8	SPAP14E8.01c|ssp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679957	2539047	2543557	275620	279974	SPCC1223.06	SPAC4H3.10c	tea1	pyk1	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679958	2539047	2542029	275620	278511	SPCC1223.06	SPAC8E11.02c	tea1	rad24	alp8	anr5|sam4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679959	2539047	2542252	275620	278722	SPCC1223.06	SPAC17A2.13c	tea1	rad25	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679960	2539047	2542682	275620	279135	SPCC1223.06	SPAC26A3.09c	tea1	rga2	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679961	2539047	2542617	275620	279071	SPCC1223.06	SPAC13A11.01c	tea1	rga8	alp8	SPAC2F7.18c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679962	2539047	2539434	275620	275997	SPCC1223.06	SPCC757.09c	tea1	rnc1	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679963	2539047	2541678	275620	278174	SPCC1223.06	SPAP7G5.05	tea1	rpl1002	alp8	rpl10|rpl10-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679964	2539047	2539222	275620	275792	SPCC1223.06	SPCC1183.08c	tea1	rpl101	alp8	rpl1-1|rpl10a-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679965	2539047	2541591	275620	278088	SPCC1223.06	SPAC26A3.07c	tea1	rpl1101	alp8	rpl11|rpl11-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679966	2539047	2539846	275620	276394	SPCC1223.06	SPBC17G9.10	tea1	rpl1102	alp8	rpl11-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679967	2539047	2543553	275620	279970	SPCC1223.06	SPAC664.05	tea1	rpl13	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679968	2539047	2539470	275620	276033	SPCC1223.06	SPCC576.11	tea1	rpl15	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679969	2539047	2542370	275620	278834	SPCC1223.06	SPAC1783.08c	tea1	rpl1502	alp8	rpl15-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679970	2539047	2541175	275620	277689	SPCC1223.06	SPBC839.13c	tea1	rpl1601	alp8	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679971	2539047	2542006	275620	278489	SPCC1223.06	SPAC23A1.11	tea1	rpl1602	alp8	rpl16-2|rpl13a-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679972	2539047	2539678	275620	276233	SPCC1223.06	SPBC11C11.07	tea1	rpl1801	alp8	rpl18|rpl18-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679973	2539047	3361377	275620	280453	SPCC1223.06	SPAPB17E12.13	tea1	rpl1802	alp8	rpl18-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679974	2539047	2540870	275620	277387	SPCC1223.06	SPBC56F2.02	tea1	rpl1901	alp8	rpl19-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679975	2539047	2539178	275620	275749	SPCC1223.06	SPCC1682.14	tea1	rpl1902	alp8	rpl19-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679976	2539047	2542725	275620	279176	SPCC1223.06	SPAC3A12.10	tea1	rpl2001	alp8	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679977	2539047	2542093	275620	278570	SPCC1223.06	SPAC26A3.04	tea1	rpl2002	alp8	rpl20|rpl20-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679978	2539047	2539286	275620	275854	SPCC1223.06	SPCC1322.11	tea1	rpl2302	alp8	rpl23-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679979	2539047	2543453	275620	279873	SPCC1223.06	SPAC3G9.03	tea1	rpl2301	alp8	rpl23-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679980	2539047	2541570	275620	278067	SPCC1223.06	SPAC6G9.09c	tea1	rpl2401	alp8	rpl24|rpl24-01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679981	2539047	2538849	275620	275430	SPCC1223.06	SPCC330.14c	tea1	rpl2402	alp8	rpl24-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679982	2539047	2540274	275620	276805	SPCC1223.06	SPBC29B5.03c	tea1	rpl26	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679983	2539047	2541156	275620	277671	SPCC1223.06	SPBC685.07c	tea1	rpl2701	alp8	rpl27-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679984	2539047	2541130	275620	277645	SPCC1223.06	SPBC776.11	tea1	rpl2801	alp8	rpl28-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679985	2539047	2542265	275620	278734	SPCC1223.06	SPAC17A5.03	tea1	rpl301	alp8	rpl3|rpl3-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679986	2539047	2543309	275620	279733	SPCC1223.06	SPAPB8E5.06c	tea1	rpl302	alp8	rpl3-2|rpl3-b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679987	2539047	2540135	275620	276672	SPCC1223.06	SPBC16C6.11	tea1	rpl3201	alp8	rpl32-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679988	2539047	2538883	275620	275461	SPCC1223.06	SPCC970.05	tea1	rpl3601	alp8	rpl36-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679989	2539047	2540644	275620	277169	SPCC1223.06	SPBC405.07	tea1	rpl3602	alp8	rpl36|rpl36-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679990	2539047	2539780	275620	276330	SPCC1223.06	SPBC1711.06	tea1	rpl401	alp8	rpl4|rpl4-1|rpl4-2|rpl402	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679991	2539047	2541344	275620	277855	SPCC1223.06	SPBP8B7.03c	tea1	rpl402	alp8	rpl4|rpl4-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679992	2539047	2542782	275620	279231	SPCC1223.06	SPAC1687.06c	tea1	rpl44	alp8	rpl28	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679993	2539047	2539372	275620	275938	SPCC1223.06	SPCC622.18	tea1	rpl6	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679994	2539047	2540841	275620	277358	SPCC1223.06	SPBC18H10.12c	tea1	rpl701	alp8	rpl7|rpl7-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679995	2539047	2543448	275620	279868	SPCC1223.06	SPAC3H5.07	tea1	rpl702	alp8	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679996	2539047	2540517	275620	277045	SPCC1223.06	SPBC29A3.04	tea1	rpl8	alp8	rpl701|rpl7a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679997	2539047	2540366	275620	276895	SPCC1223.06	SPBC2F12.07c	tea1	rpl802	alp8	rpk37|rpk5b|rpl8-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679998	2539047	5802952	275620	858090	SPCC1223.06	SPAC1F7.13c	tea1	rpl801	alp8	SPAC21E11.02c|rpk5a|rpl18|rpl2-1|rpl8-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
679999	2539047	2542907	275620	279351	SPCC1223.06	SPAC1420.03	tea1	rpn501	alp8	rpn5|rpn5-a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680000	2539047	2543347	275620	279769	SPCC1223.06	SPAPB8E5.02c	tea1	rpn502	alp8	rpn5|rpn5-b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680001	2539047	2543120	275620	279552	SPCC1223.06	SPAC31G5.03	tea1	rps1101	alp8	rps11-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680002	2539047	2542904	275620	279348	SPCC1223.06	SPAC144.11	tea1	rps1102	alp8	rps11|rps11-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680003	2539047	2539067	275620	275639	SPCC1223.06	SPCC576.08c	tea1	rps2	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680004	2539047	2540649	275620	277174	SPCC1223.06	SPBC19F8.08	tea1	rps401	alp8	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680005	2539047	2540325	275620	276855	SPCC1223.06	SPBC21B10.10	tea1	rps402	alp8	rps4-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680006	2539047	2542870	275620	279315	SPCC1223.06	SPAC13G6.07c	tea1	rps601	alp8	rps6-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680007	2539047	2543581	275620	279996	SPCC1223.06	SPAPB1E7.12	tea1	rps602	alp8	rps6|rps6-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680008	2539047	2541491	275620	277993	SPCC1223.06	SPAC2C4.16c	tea1	rps801	alp8	rps8|rps8-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680009	2539047	2543354	275620	279776	SPCC1223.06	SPAC521.05	tea1	rps802	alp8	rps8-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680010	2539047	2542629	275620	279083	SPCC1223.06	SPAC24H6.07	tea1	rps901	alp8	rps9-1|rps9a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680011	2539047	2540367	275620	276896	SPCC1223.06	SPBC29A3.12	tea1	rps902	alp8	rps9-2|rps9b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680012	2539047	2540939	275620	277455	SPCC1223.06	SPBC4.07c	tea1	rpt2	alp8	mts2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680013	2539047	2539539	275620	276101	SPCC1223.06	SPCC576.10c	tea1	rpt3	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680014	2539047	2540487	275620	277015	SPCC1223.06	SPBC23G7.12c	tea1	rpt6	alp8	let1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680015	2539047	2541680	275620	278176	SPCC1223.06	SPAC22F8.09	tea1	rrp16	alp8	nop53	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680016	2539047	2539943	275620	276487	SPCC1223.06	SPBC14F5.05c	tea1	sam1	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680017	2539047	2542247	275620	278717	SPCC1223.06	SPAC57A7.10c	tea1	sec21	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680018	2539047	2540050	275620	276588	SPCC1223.06	SPBC16C6.13c	tea1	sec27	alp8	SPBC244.03	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680019	2539047	2540199	275620	276732	SPCC1223.06	SPBC1709.05	tea1	sks2	alp8	hsc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680020	2539047	2542443	275620	278905	SPCC1223.06	SPAC17G6.13	tea1	slt1	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680021	2539047	2542689	275620	279142	SPCC1223.06	SPAC29B12.04	tea1	snz1	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680022	2539047	2542948	275620	279388	SPCC1223.06	SPAC1006.07	tea1	SPAC1006.07	alp8	tif1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680023	2539047	2542920	275620	279361	SPCC1223.06	SPAC10F6.01c	tea1	sir1	alp8	SPAC4C5.05c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680024	2539047	2541645	275620	278141	SPCC1223.06	SPAC1527.03	tea1	SPAC1527.03	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680025	2539047	2542300	275620	278767	SPCC1223.06	SPAC1687.22c	tea1	puf3	alp8	SPAC222.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680026	2539047	2542408	275620	278872	SPCC1223.06	SPAC17A5.15c	tea1	gus1	alp8	SPAC17A5.15c|ers1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680027	2539047	2542519	275620	278977	SPCC1223.06	SPAC19G12.08	tea1	scs7	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680028	2539047	2542126	275620	278602	SPCC1223.06	SPAC1B3.05	tea1	not3	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680029	2539047	2542217	275620	278691	SPCC1223.06	SPAC1B3.13	tea1	nan1	alp8	SPAC1B3.13	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680030	2539047	2542269	275620	278738	SPCC1223.06	SPAC1F12.07	tea1	SPAC1F12.07	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680031	2539047	2541874	275620	278364	SPCC1223.06	SPAC1F8.07c	tea1	SPAC1F8.07c	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680032	2539047	2542001	275620	278485	SPCC1223.06	SPAC20G8.06	tea1	not1	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680033	2539047	2542520	275620	278978	SPCC1223.06	SPAC20G8.09c	tea1	nat10	alp8	SPAC20G8.09c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680034	2539047	2543388	275620	279810	SPCC1223.06	SPAC20H4.01	tea1	utp5	alp8	SPAC631.03	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680035	2539047	2542038	275620	278520	SPCC1223.06	SPAC23C11.03	tea1	SPAC23C11.03	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680036	2539047	2542651	275620	279105	SPCC1223.06	SPAC24C9.12c	tea1	SPAC24C9.12c	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680037	2539047	2542090	275620	278567	SPCC1223.06	SPAC25G10.08	tea1	SPAC25G10.08	alp8	p116	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680038	2539047	2542074	275620	278551	SPCC1223.06	SPAC26A3.10	tea1	cnt6	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680039	2539047	2541629	275620	278125	SPCC1223.06	SPAC2F7.05c	tea1	SPAC2F7.05c	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680040	2539047	2543087	275620	279520	SPCC1223.06	SPAC30C2.04	tea1	SPAC30C2.04	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680041	2539047	2543160	275620	279591	SPCC1223.06	SPAC31A2.14	tea1	bun107	alp8	wdr48	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680042	2539047	2543631	275620	280045	SPCC1223.06	SPAC458.02c	tea1	SPAC458.02c	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680043	2539047	2543540	275620	279957	SPCC1223.06	SPAC664.08c	tea1	bfr2	alp8	SPAC664.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680044	2539047	2542056	275620	278535	SPCC1223.06	SPAC6G9.14	tea1	SPAC6G9.14	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680045	2539047	2543662	275620	280076	SPCC1223.06	SPAC9.07c	tea1	SPAC9.07c	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680046	2539047	2542976	275620	279414	SPCC1223.06	SPAC9E9.09c	tea1	atd1	alp8	SPAC9E9.09c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680047	2539047	2542795	275620	279243	SPCC1223.06	SPAC9G1.05	tea1	aip1	alp8	SPAC9G1.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680048	2539047	2539673	275620	276228	SPCC1223.06	SPBC13G1.10c	tea1	mug81	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680049	2539047	2539879	275620	276425	SPCC1223.06	SPBC1703.07	tea1	SPBC1703.07	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680050	2539047	2539687	275620	276242	SPCC1223.06	SPBC1711.05	tea1	SPBC1711.05	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680051	2539047	2539671	275620	276226	SPCC1223.06	SPBC1734.11	tea1	mas5	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680052	2539047	2540052	275620	276590	SPCC1223.06	SPBC17A3.04c	tea1	rar1	alp8	mes1|mrs1|pi042	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680053	2539047	2539746	275620	276298	SPCC1223.06	SPBC17G9.03c	tea1	krs1	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680054	2539047	2540796	275620	277315	SPCC1223.06	SPBC1A4.07c	tea1	sof1	alp8	SPBC1A4.07c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680055	2539047	2540387	275620	276915	SPCC1223.06	SPBC24C6.04	tea1	SPBC24C6.04	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680056	2539047	2540570	275620	277097	SPCC1223.06	SPBC25H2.16c	tea1	gga22	alp8	SPBC25H2.16c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680057	2539047	2540441	275620	276969	SPCC1223.06	SPBC2G5.05	tea1	SPBC2G5.05	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680058	2539047	2540908	275620	277424	SPCC1223.06	SPBC3B8.03	tea1	SPBC3B8.03	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680059	2539047	2541000	275620	277516	SPCC1223.06	SPBC3B8.09	tea1	SPBC3B8.09	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680060	2539047	2540674	275620	277199	SPCC1223.06	SPBC3F6.04c	tea1	nop14	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680061	2539047	2540972	275620	277488	SPCC1223.06	SPBC428.15	tea1	SPBC428.15	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680062	2539047	2541066	275620	277581	SPCC1223.06	SPBC543.02c	tea1	SPBC543.02c	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680063	2539047	2540842	275620	277359	SPCC1223.06	SPBC56F2.04	tea1	utp20	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680064	2539047	2540883	275620	277400	SPCC1223.06	SPBC577.06c	tea1	stt4	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680065	2539047	2541070	275620	277585	SPCC1223.06	SPBC646.07c	tea1	SPBC646.07c	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680066	2539047	2541087	275620	277602	SPCC1223.06	SPBC646.10c	tea1	SPBC646.10c	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680067	2539047	2541077	275620	277592	SPCC1223.06	SPBC83.08	tea1	rvb2	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680068	2539047	2541350	275620	277861	SPCC1223.06	SPBP4H10.11c	tea1	lcf2	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680069	2539047	2541348	275620	277859	SPCC1223.06	SPBP4H10.15	tea1	SPBP4H10.15	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680070	2539047	2541411	275620	277919	SPCC1223.06	SPBPB2B2.12c	tea1	gal10	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680071	2539047	2541412	275620	277920	SPCC1223.06	SPBPJ4664.04	tea1	SPBPJ4664.04	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680072	2539047	2539299	275620	275867	SPCC1223.06	SPCC1672.07	tea1	SPCC1672.07	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680073	2539047	2539381	275620	275947	SPCC1223.06	SPCC1739.10	tea1	mug33	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680074	2539047	2538766	275620	275349	SPCC1223.06	SPCC306.08c	tea1	SPCC306.08c	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680075	2539047	2539425	275620	275990	SPCC1223.06	SPCC550.14	tea1	vgl1	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680076	2539047	2538821	275620	275402	SPCC1223.06	SPCC584.01c	tea1	SPCC584.01c	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680077	2539047	2539181	275620	275752	SPCC1223.06	SPCC622.14	tea1	SPCC622.14	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680078	2539047	2539093	275620	275665	SPCC1223.06	SPCC736.15	tea1	pil1	alp8	SPCC736.15	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680079	2539047	2539509	275620	276071	SPCC1223.06	SPCC825.01	tea1	SPCC825.01	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680080	2539047	2538792	275620	275373	SPCC1223.06	SPCP1E11.10	tea1	SPCP1E11.10	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680081	2539047	2538833	275620	275414	SPCC1223.06	SPCP1E11.11	tea1	puf6	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680082	2539047	2538808	275620	275389	SPCC1223.06	SPCPB16A4.05c	tea1	SPCPB16A4.05c	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680083	2539047	2543413	275620	279835	SPCC1223.06	SPAC4F8.12c	tea1	spp42	alp8	cwf6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680084	2539047	2542772	275620	279221	SPCC1223.06	SPAC16.02c	tea1	srp2	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680085	2539047	2542875	275620	279320	SPCC1223.06	SPAC13G7.02c	tea1	ssa1	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680086	2539047	2539225	275620	275795	SPCC1223.06	SPCC1739.13	tea1	ssa2	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680087	2539047	2543026	275620	279462	SPCC1223.06	SPAC664.11	tea1	ssc1	alp8	ssp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680088	2539047	2541652	275620	278148	SPCC1223.06	SPAC24B11.06c	tea1	sty1	alp8	phh1|spc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680089	2539047	2540422	275620	276950	SPCC1223.06	SPBC27.08c	tea1	sua1	alp8	SPBC28F2.01c|asp1|met3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680090	2539047	2543537	275620	279954	SPCC1223.06	SPAC4D7.05	tea1	sum1	alp8	tif34	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680091	2539047	2538689	275620	275274	SPCC1223.06	SPCC1795.11	tea1	sum3	alp8	ded1|moc2|slh3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680092	2539047	2540547	275620	277074	SPCC1223.06	SPBC32F12.11	tea1	tdh1	alp8	gpd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680093	2539047	2539047	275620	275620	SPCC1223.06	SPCC1223.06	tea1	tea1	alp8	alp8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680094	2539047	2539857	275620	276404	SPCC1223.06	SPBC1604.20c	tea1	tea2	alp8	klp4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680095	2539047	2542619	275620	279073	SPCC1223.06	SPAC6G10.02c	tea1	tea3	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680096	2539047	2539642	275620	276197	SPCC1223.06	SPBC1706.01	tea1	tea4	alp8	wsh3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680097	2539047	2539295	275620	275863	SPCC1223.06	SPCC417.08	tea1	tef3	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680098	2539047	2540550	275620	277077	SPCC1223.06	SPBC25H2.02	tea1	trs1	alp8	ths1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680099	2539047	2540819	275620	277337	SPCC1223.06	SPBC18H10.03	tea1	tif35	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680100	2539047	2542290	275620	278758	SPCC1223.06	SPAC17C9.03	tea1	tif471	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680101	2539047	2543044	275620	279479	SPCC1223.06	SPAC3C7.12	tea1	tip1	alp8	noc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680102	2539047	2543304	275620	279728	SPCC1223.06	SPAC6B12.12	tea1	tom70	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680103	2539047	2538729	275620	275313	SPCC1223.06	SPCC24B10.21	tea1	tpi1	alp8	tpi	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680104	2539047	2539973	275620	276517	SPCC1223.06	SPBC1539.09c	tea1	trp1	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680105	2539047	2538886	275620	275464	SPCC1223.06	SPCC895.04c	tea1	ufe1	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680106	2539047	2540284	275620	276815	SPCC1223.06	SPBC23E6.04c	tea1	utp10	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680107	2539047	2543408	275620	279830	SPCC1223.06	SPAC637.05c	tea1	vma2	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680108	2539047	2542310	275620	278776	SPCC1223.06	SPAC16E8.07c	tea1	vph1	alp8	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
680109	2539047	2542724	275620	279175	SPCC1223.06	SPAC767.01c	tea1	vps1	alp8	SPAC9G1.14c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
692468	853041	2542196	33386	278671	YGR140W	SPAC30D11.13	CBF2	hus5	CEP2|CSL5|CTF14|NDC10|CBF3A|L000000430|L000001238|L000000221	ubc9	Two-hybrid	physical	Jiang W (1996)	8668125	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
692472	7329	2542196	113177	278671	LA16c-358B7.1	SPAC30D11.13	UBE2I	hus5	C358B7.1|P18|UBC9	ubc9	Two-hybrid	physical	Jiang W (1996)	8668125	9606	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
692474	851495	2542196	31995	278671	YDL064W	SPAC30D11.13	UBC9	hus5	E2 SUMO-conjugating protein UBC9|L000002636	ubc9	Two-hybrid	physical	Jiang W (1996)	8668125	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
697195	2540727	51194	277250	119368	SPBC1921.03c	-	mex67	IPO11	-	RanBP11	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Zhang ZC (2011)	21965294	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	-	-	table 2.	-	BIOGRID
697196	2540727	3612	277250	109825	SPBC1921.03c	-	mex67	IMPA1	-	IMP|IMPA	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Zhang ZC (2011)	21965294	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	-	-	table 2.	-	BIOGRID
725717	2541959	2542467	278446	278928	SPAC23C4.03	SPAC1834.04	hrk1	hht1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yamagishi Y (2010)	20929775	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
733032	2539623	2539821	276180	276371	SPBC16A3.09c	SPBC1711.10c	ufd1	npl4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
734559	2541355	2539658	277866	276213	SPBP8B7.19	SPBC1105.17	spt16	cnp1	-	sim2	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Choi ES (2012)	23028377	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
734560	2541088	2539658	277603	276213	SPBC609.05	SPBC1105.17	pob3	cnp1	-	sim2	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Choi ES (2012)	23028377	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
734561	2541355	2539658	277866	276213	SPBP8B7.19	SPBC1105.17	spt16	cnp1	-	sim2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Choi ES (2012)	23028377	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution	overexpression of Cnp1 causes it's mislocalization to moderately transcribed genes in an spt16 mutant	-	BIOGRID
734562	2541605	2539658	278102	276213	SPAC1F7.01c	SPBC1105.17	spt6	cnp1	SPAC694.07c	sim2	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Choi ES (2012)	23028377	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
734563	2541088	2542304	277603	278771	SPBC609.05	SPAC1687.20c	pob3	mis6	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Choi ES (2012)	23028377	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
734564	2541088	2538763	277603	275346	SPBC609.05	SPCC970.12	pob3	mis18	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Choi ES (2012)	23028377	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
734566	2541624	2539658	278120	276213	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC1105.17	pst2	cnp1	-	sim2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Choi ES (2012)	23028377	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution	overexpression of Cnp1 can cause mislocalization in very specific DNA regions such as subtelomeric domains in the absence of pst2	-	BIOGRID
734567	2543580	2541652	279995	278148	SPAC644.14c	SPAC24B11.06c	rad51	sty1	rhp51	phh1|spc1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bellini A (2012)	23118915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification:wild type	deletion of rhp51 causes a constitutive basal level phosphorylation of rad52 which is abolished by deletion of sty1	-	BIOGRID
734572	2540560	2538846	277087	275427	SPBC2D10.14c	SPCC1919.10c	myo51	myo52	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Presti LL (2012)	23051734	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology|protein transport	double mutants display aberrant actin cable organization|double mutants display aberrant actin cable organization and a decrease in F-actin retrograde flow	-	BIOGRID
734574	2540560	2542123	277087	278599	SPBC2D10.14c	SPAC18G6.15	myo51	mal3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Presti LL (2012)	23051734	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology	combining myo51/myo52 null mutants with mal3 null mutants led to a stronger cable phenotype than that of myo51/myo52 alone|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
734575	2538846	2542123	275427	278599	SPCC1919.10c	SPAC18G6.15	myo52	mal3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Presti LL (2012)	23051734	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology	combining myo51/myo52 null mutants with mal3 null mutants led to a stronger cable phenotype than that of myo51/myo52 alone|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
734596	2538846	2539487	275427	276050	SPCC1919.10c	SPCC895.05	myo52	for3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Presti LL (2012)	23051734	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
734597	2539487	2538846	276050	275427	SPCC895.05	SPCC1919.10c	for3	myo52	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Presti LL (2012)	23051734	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
734601	2540283	2542513	276814	278971	SPBC1A4.02c	SPAC1952.05	leu1	gcn5	SPBC1E8.07c	kat2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Takahashi H (2012)	22992726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	double mutants show decreased sensitivity to NH4Cl	-	BIOGRID
734602	2540283	2539174	276814	275745	SPBC1A4.02c	SPCC24B10.08c	leu1	ada2	SPBC1E8.07c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Takahashi H (2012)	22992726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	double mutants show decreased sensitivity to NH4Cl	-	BIOGRID
734603	2540283	2540436	276814	276964	SPBC1A4.02c	SPBC28F2.10c	leu1	ngg1	SPBC1E8.07c	ada3|kap1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Takahashi H (2012)	22992726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	double mutants show decreased sensitivity to NH4Cl	-	BIOGRID
734604	2540283	2540787	276814	277306	SPBC1A4.02c	SPBC1921.07c	leu1	sgf29	SPBC1E8.07c	SPBC21D10.13	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Takahashi H (2012)	22992726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	double mutants show slightly decreased sensitivity to NH4Cl	-	BIOGRID
734605	2540283	2538769	276814	275352	SPBC1A4.02c	SPCC126.04c	leu1	sgf73	SPBC1E8.07c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Takahashi H (2012)	22992726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	double mutants show slightly decreased sensitivity to NH4Cl	-	BIOGRID
734606	2540283	2541265	276814	277779	SPBC1A4.02c	SPBP16F5.03c	leu1	tra1	SPBC1E8.07c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Takahashi H (2012)	22992726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to NH4Cl	-	BIOGRID
734607	2540283	2539775	276814	276326	SPBC1A4.02c	SPBC14C8.17c	leu1	spt8	SPBC1E8.07c	sep9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Takahashi H (2012)	22992726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to NH4Cl	-	BIOGRID
734608	2540283	2540821	276814	277339	SPBC1A4.02c	SPBC800.03	leu1	clr3	SPBC1E8.07c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Takahashi H (2012)	22992726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show slightly increased sensitivity to NH4Cl	-	BIOGRID
734609	2540283	2543643	276814	280057	SPBC1A4.02c	SPAC3G9.07c	leu1	hos2	SPBC1E8.07c	hda1|phd1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Takahashi H (2012)	22992726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show slightly increased sensitivity to NH4Cl	-	BIOGRID
734642	2541265	2542513	277779	278971	SPBP16F5.03c	SPAC1952.05	tra1	gcn5	-	kat2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Takahashi H (2012)	22992726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of gcn5 shows slightly decreased sensitivity to NH4Cl compared to the single mutant	-	BIOGRID
734643	2543339	2542513	279762	278971	SPAC630.13c	SPAC1952.05	tsc2	gcn5	-	kat2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Takahashi H (2012)	22992726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of gcn5 shows slightly decreased sensitivity to NH4Cl compared to the single mutant	-	BIOGRID
734644	2542513	2539173	278971	275744	SPAC1952.05	SPCC965.11c	gcn5	agp3	kat2	SPCC965.11c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Takahashi H (2012)	22992726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient uptake:wild type	the double mutant exhibited complete reversal of the increased leucine uptake seen in the single gcn5 null mutant	-	BIOGRID
734651	2540460	2540719	276988	277242	SPBC2A9.07c	SPBC216.05	hpz1	rad3	SPBC2A9.07c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Boe CA (2012)	22970243	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
734653	2541975	2541203	278460	277717	SPAC20G8.05c	SPBC83.18c	cdc15	fic1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bohnert KA (2012)	23093943	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
734654	2542740	2541203	279190	277717	SPAC9G1.06c	SPBC83.18c	cyk3	fic1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bohnert KA (2012)	23093943	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
734673	2539047	2539487	275620	276050	SPCC1223.06	SPCC895.05	tea1	for3	alp8	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bohnert KA (2012)	23093943	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	double mutants cause cell rounding	-	BIOGRID
734674	2541203	2539487	277717	276050	SPBC83.18c	SPCC895.05	fic1	for3	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bohnert KA (2012)	23093943	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis:partial rescue	expression of a tea1-for3 fusion protein partially rescues cytokinesis-based growth polarity defects in a fic1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
734675	2541203	2539047	277717	275620	SPBC83.18c	SPCC1223.06	fic1	tea1	-	alp8	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bohnert KA (2012)	23093943	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis:partial rescue	expression of a tea1-for3 fusion protein partially rescues cytokinesis-based growth polarity defects in a fic1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
734676	2539244	2541203	275814	277717	SPCC1672.06c	SPBC83.18c	asp1	fic1	vip1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bohnert KA (2012)	23093943	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	invasive growth:partial rescue	double mutants show a partial rescue of invasive growth on 3% agar	-	BIOGRID
734677	2539244	2543516	275814	279934	SPCC1672.06c	SPAC4F10.11	asp1	spn1	vip1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bohnert KA (2012)	23093943	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	invasive growth:partial rescue	double mutants show a partial rescue of invasive growth on 3% agar	-	BIOGRID
734678	2539244	2542234	275814	278706	SPCC1672.06c	SPAC9E9.14	asp1	vps24	vip1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bohnert KA (2012)	23093943	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	invasive growth:partial rescue	double mutants show a partial rescue of invasive growth on 3% agar	-	BIOGRID
734679	2539407	2542129	275972	278605	SPCC970.09	SPAC17G8.12	sec8	sec3	-	SPAC17G8.12	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jourdain I (2012)	22891673	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
734680	2542129	2539407	278605	275972	SPAC17G8.12	SPCC970.09	sec3	sec8	SPAC17G8.12	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jourdain I (2012)	22891673	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
734681	2542129	2540127	278605	276664	SPAC17G8.12	SPBC106.20	sec3	exo70	SPAC17G8.12	SPBC582.02	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Jourdain I (2012)	22891673	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
734682	2542129	2539407	278605	275972	SPAC17G8.12	SPCC970.09	sec3	sec8	SPAC17G8.12	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Jourdain I (2012)	22891673	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
734689	2542129	2539487	278605	276050	SPAC17G8.12	SPCC895.05	sec3	for3	SPAC17G8.12	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jourdain I (2012)	22891673	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
734690	2539487	2542129	276050	278605	SPCC895.05	SPAC17G8.12	for3	sec3	-	SPAC17G8.12	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jourdain I (2012)	22891673	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
734696	2542988	2542873	279426	279318	SPAC1006.09	SPAC9G1.02	win1	wis4	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	wak1|wik1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Salgado A (2012)	22912829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show enhanced sensitivity to arsenate	-	BIOGRID
734697	2542988	2542677	279426	279130	SPAC1006.09	SPAC26F1.10c	win1	pyp1	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Salgado A (2012)	22912829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification|resistance to chemicals	cells lacking Pyp1 activity in a wis4-null/win1-1 genetic background showed a decreased capacity to phosphorylate Spc1 upon arsenate treatment|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
734698	2542873	2542677	279318	279130	SPAC9G1.02	SPAC26F1.10c	wis4	pyp1	wak1|wik1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Salgado A (2012)	22912829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification|resistance to chemicals	cells lacking Pyp1 activity in a wis4-null/win1-1 genetic background showed a decreased capacity to phosphorylate Spc1 upon arsenate treatment|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
734699	2543630	2539403	280044	275968	SPAC1F3.01	SPCC736.11	rrp6	ago1	SPAC3H8.11	csp9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yamanaka S (2012)	23151475	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type	deletion inhibits the formation of Tf2 antisense small RNAs seen in an rrp6 mutant	-	BIOGRID
734700	2543630	2538930	280044	275506	SPAC1F3.01	SPCC188.13c	rrp6	dcr1	SPAC3H8.11	SPCC584.10c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yamanaka S (2012)	23151475	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type	deletion inhibits the formation of Tf2 antisense small RNAs seen in an rrp6 mutant	-	BIOGRID
734701	2543630	2540825	280044	277343	SPAC1F3.01	SPBC428.08c	rrp6	clr4	SPAC3H8.11	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yamanaka S (2012)	23151475	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type	deletion inhibits the formation of Tf2 antisense small RNAs seen in an rrp6 mutant	-	BIOGRID
734702	2543630	2542198	280044	278673	SPAC1F3.01	SPAC6F12.09	rrp6	rdp1	SPAC3H8.11	rdr1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yamanaka S (2012)	23151475	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type	deletion inhibits the formation of Tf2 antisense small RNAs seen in an rrp6 mutant	-	BIOGRID
734703	2543630	2539403	280044	275968	SPAC1F3.01	SPCC736.11	rrp6	ago1	SPAC3H8.11	csp9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yamanaka S (2012)	23151475	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	double mutants show severe defects in silencing of Tf2 and sexual differentiation genes	-	BIOGRID
734704	2543630	2538930	280044	275506	SPAC1F3.01	SPCC188.13c	rrp6	dcr1	SPAC3H8.11	SPCC584.10c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yamanaka S (2012)	23151475	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	double mutants show severe defects in silencing of Tf2 and sexual differentiation genes	-	BIOGRID
734705	2543630	2540825	280044	277343	SPAC1F3.01	SPBC428.08c	rrp6	clr4	SPAC3H8.11	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yamanaka S (2012)	23151475	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	double mutants show severe defects in silencing of Tf2 and sexual differentiation genes	-	BIOGRID
734706	2543630	2542198	280044	278673	SPAC1F3.01	SPAC6F12.09	rrp6	rdp1	SPAC3H8.11	rdr1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yamanaka S (2012)	23151475	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	double mutants show severe defects in silencing of Tf2 and sexual differentiation genes	-	BIOGRID
734790	2543630	2543254	280044	279682	SPAC1F3.01	SPAC1006.03c	rrp6	red1	SPAC3H8.11	iss3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yamanaka S (2012)	23151475	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:partial rescue|protein/peptide distribution:partial rescue	Combining rrp6 deletion mutants with red1, pab2 or pla1 mutants caused a reduction in siRNAs and H3K9me at Tf2 and most genes	-	BIOGRID
734791	2543630	2539733	280044	276285	SPAC1F3.01	SPBC16E9.12c	rrp6	pab2	SPAC3H8.11	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yamanaka S (2012)	23151475	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:partial rescue|protein/peptide distribution:partial rescue	Combining rrp6 deletion mutants with red1, pab2 or pla1 mutants caused a reduction in siRNAs and H3K9me at Tf2 and most genes	-	BIOGRID
734792	2543630	2541099	280044	277614	SPAC1F3.01	SPBC646.04	rrp6	pla1	SPAC3H8.11	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yamanaka S (2012)	23151475	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:partial rescue|protein/peptide distribution:partial rescue	Combining rrp6 deletion mutants with red1, pab2 or pla1 mutants caused a reduction in siRNAs and H3K9me at Tf2 and most genes	-	BIOGRID
734793	2543630	2541099	280044	277614	SPAC1F3.01	SPBC646.04	rrp6	pla1	SPAC3H8.11	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yamanaka S (2012)	23151475	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	double mutants show severe defects in silencing of Tf2 and sexual differentiation genes	-	BIOGRID
734944	2540917	2542815	277433	279262	SPBC409.05	SPAC13D6.01	skp1	pof14	psh1|sph1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tafforeau L (2006)	17016471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
734951	2539367	2542304	275933	278771	SPCC4B3.18	SPAC1687.20c	ppc1	mis6	SPCC4B3.18	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakamura T (2012)	23091701	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	double mutants show additive growth defect and permissive and semi-permissive temperatures	-	BIOGRID
734952	2539367	2540494	275933	277022	SPCC4B3.18	SPBC409.04c	ppc1	mis12	SPCC4B3.18	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakamura T (2012)	23091701	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	double mutants show additive growth defect and permissive and semi-permissive temperatures	-	BIOGRID
734953	2539367	2539214	275933	275784	SPCC4B3.18	SPCC1672.10	ppc1	mis16	SPCC4B3.18	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakamura T (2012)	23091701	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	double mutants show additive growth defect and permissive and semi-permissive temperatures	-	BIOGRID
734954	2539367	2543506	275933	279924	SPCC4B3.18	SPAC637.12c	ppc1	mst1	SPCC4B3.18	kat5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakamura T (2012)	23091701	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	double mutants show additive growth defect and permissive and semi-permissive temperatures	-	BIOGRID
734955	2539367	2538868	275933	275448	SPCC4B3.18	SPCC132.02	ppc1	hst2	SPCC4B3.18	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakamura T (2012)	23091701	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	double mutants show additive growth defect and permissive and semi-permissive temperatures	-	BIOGRID
734956	2539367	2542366	275933	278830	SPCC4B3.18	SPAC1783.04c	ppc1	hst4	SPCC4B3.18	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakamura T (2012)	23091701	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	double mutants show additive growth defect and permissive and semi-permissive temperatures	-	BIOGRID
734957	2539367	2540368	275933	276897	SPCC4B3.18	SPBC36.05c	ppc1	clr6	SPCC4B3.18	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakamura T (2012)	23091701	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	double mutants show additive growth defect and permissive and semi-permissive temperatures	-	BIOGRID
734958	2539367	2540821	275933	277339	SPCC4B3.18	SPBC800.03	ppc1	clr3	SPCC4B3.18	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakamura T (2012)	23091701	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	double mutants show additive growth defect and permissive and semi-permissive temperatures	-	BIOGRID
734959	2539367	2543643	275933	280057	SPCC4B3.18	SPAC3G9.07c	ppc1	hos2	SPCC4B3.18	hda1|phd1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakamura T (2012)	23091701	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	double mutants show additive growth defect and permissive and semi-permissive temperatures	-	BIOGRID
734960	2539367	3361342	275933	280418	SPCC4B3.18	SPBC16D10.07c	ppc1	sir2	SPCC4B3.18	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nakamura T (2012)	23091701	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|protein/peptide modification:wild type|vegetative growth:undetermined	deletion of sir2 rescues growth in a ppc1 mutant and histone 4 acetylation levels	-	BIOGRID
735046	2538714	2542637	275298	279091	SPCC330.11	SPAC24H6.03	btb1	cul3	-	pcu3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Geyer R (2003)	14527422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735047	2540546	2542637	277073	279091	SPBC25B2.06c	SPAC24H6.03	btb2	cul3	-	pcu3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Geyer R (2003)	14527422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735048	2542872	2542637	279317	279091	SPAC13D6.04c	SPAC24H6.03	btb3	cul3	-	pcu3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Geyer R (2003)	14527422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735049	2538714	2541897	275298	278387	SPCC330.11	SPAC23H4.18c	btb1	rbx1	-	pip1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Geyer R (2003)	14527422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735050	2540546	2541897	277073	278387	SPBC25B2.06c	SPAC23H4.18c	btb2	rbx1	-	pip1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Geyer R (2003)	14527422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735051	2542872	2541897	279317	278387	SPAC13D6.04c	SPAC23H4.18c	btb3	rbx1	-	pip1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Geyer R (2003)	14527422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735052	3361358	2542084	280434	278561	SPBC3F6.03	SPAC7D4.07c	trr1	trx1	caf4	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Garcia-Santamarina S (2012)	23121505	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chemical compound accumulation	double mutants show a lower cellular level of oxidized thiols|genetic complex|trr1/trx1/txl1 triple mutants show a lower cellular level of oxidized thiols than double mutants	-	BIOGRID
735053	2542084	2541028	278561	277543	SPAC7D4.07c	SPBC577.08c	trx1	txl1	-	trx3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Garcia-Santamarina S (2012)	23121505	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chemical compound accumulation	double mutants show a lower cellular level of oxidized thiols|genetic complex|trr1/trx1/txl1 triple mutants show a lower cellular level of oxidized thiols than double mutants	-	BIOGRID
735054	2542084	2539572	278561	276132	SPAC7D4.07c	SPCC576.03c	trx1	tpx1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Garcia-Santamarina S (2012)	23121505	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chemical compound accumulation	double mutants show a lower cellular level of oxidized thiols	-	BIOGRID
735055	3361358	2541028	280434	277543	SPBC3F6.03	SPBC577.08c	trr1	txl1	caf4	trx3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Garcia-Santamarina S (2012)	23121505	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chemical compound accumulation	genetic complex|trr1/trx1/txl1 triple mutants show a lower cellular level of oxidized thiols than double mutants	-	BIOGRID
735056	2542363	2543064	278827	279497	SPAC1783.05	SPAC3G6.01	hrp1	hrp3	chd1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Pointner J (2012)	23103765	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution	the combined absence of Hrp1 and Hrp3 completely blurred the nucleosome occupancy peaks downstream of the +2 position	-	BIOGRID
735057	2542363	2543064	278827	279497	SPAC1783.05	SPAC3G6.01	hrp1	hrp3	chd1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Pointner J (2012)	23103765	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	genetic complex|hrp1/hrp3/mit1 triple mutants are inviable	-	BIOGRID
735058	2542363	2541336	278827	277847	SPAC1783.05	SPBP35G2.10	hrp1	mit1	chd1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Pointner J (2012)	23103765	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	genetic complex|hrp1/hrp3/mit1 triple mutants are inviable	-	BIOGRID
735059	2543064	2541336	279497	277847	SPAC3G6.01	SPBP35G2.10	hrp3	mit1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Pointner J (2012)	23103765	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	genetic complex|hrp1/hrp3/mit1 triple mutants are inviable	-	BIOGRID
735113	2541056	2539733	277571	276285	SPBC577.04	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC577.04	pab2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Larochelle M (2012)	22965128	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:partial rescue	the levels of mature snoRNAs were reduced in the tho5/pab2 double-mutant strain relative to the single tho5 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735114	2541056	2541639	277571	278135	SPBC577.04	SPAC6F12.16c	SPBC577.04	mtr4	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Larochelle M (2012)	22965128	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation|vegetative growth	double mutants show synthetic defects in snoRNA expression	-	BIOGRID
735115	2539006	2541639	275579	278135	SPCC24B10.11c	SPAC6F12.16c	mft1	mtr4	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Larochelle M (2012)	22965128	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation|vegetative growth	double mutants show synthetic defects in snoRNA expression	-	BIOGRID
735116	2541056	3361384	277571	280460	SPBC577.04	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC577.04	cid14	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Larochelle M (2012)	22965128	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation|vegetative growth	double mutants show synthetic defects in snoRNA expression	-	BIOGRID
735117	2539006	3361384	275579	280460	SPCC24B10.11c	SPAC12G12.13c	mft1	cid14	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Larochelle M (2012)	22965128	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation|vegetative growth	double mutants show synthetic defects in snoRNA expression	-	BIOGRID
735122	2541056	2541639	277571	278135	SPBC577.04	SPAC6F12.16c	SPBC577.04	mtr4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Larochelle M (2012)	22965128	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735123	3361454	2541639	280530	278135	SPAC1D4.14	SPAC6F12.16c	tho2	mtr4	SPAC22F3.14c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Larochelle M (2012)	22965128	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735124	2541056	3361384	277571	280460	SPBC577.04	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC577.04	cid14	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Larochelle M (2012)	22965128	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	ChIP	-	BIOGRID
735125	2539006	3361384	275579	280460	SPCC24B10.11c	SPAC12G12.13c	mft1	cid14	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Larochelle M (2012)	22965128	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	ChIP	-	BIOGRID
735126	2541349	2539733	277860	276285	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC16E9.12c	air1	pab2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Larochelle M (2012)	22965128	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:partial rescue	the levels of mature snoRNAs were reduced upon deletion of pab2 relative to the single mutant	-	BIOGRID
735127	2541639	2539733	278135	276285	SPAC6F12.16c	SPBC16E9.12c	mtr4	pab2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Larochelle M (2012)	22965128	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:partial rescue	the levels of mature snoRNAs were reduced upon deletion of pab2 relative to the single mutant	-	BIOGRID
735128	3361384	2539733	280460	276285	SPAC12G12.13c	SPBC16E9.12c	cid14	pab2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Larochelle M (2012)	22965128	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:partial rescue	the levels of mature snoRNAs were reduced upon deletion of pab2 relative to the single mutant	-	BIOGRID
735144	2540720	2540500	277243	277028	SPBC216.07c	SPBC36B7.09	tor2	gcn2	SPBC646.01c	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Valbuena N (2012)	23108671	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification:wild type	deletion of gcn2 prevents the phosphorylation of eIf2alpha seen in a tor2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735148	2539051	2541425	275624	277930	SPCC1183.11	SPAC2C4.17c	msy1	msy2	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	SPAC2C4.17c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nakayama Y (2012)	22910366	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	osmotic stress resistance	double mutants show decreased viability and cell swelling in response to hypo-osmotic shock	-	BIOGRID
735192	2540511	2539640	277039	276195	SPBC1718.01	SPBC32F12.09	pop1	rum1	SPBC2G2.18|ste16	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Kominami K (1997)	9203581	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	overexpression is lethal in a pop1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735193	2540511	2540013	277039	276557	SPBC1718.01	SPBC14C8.07c	pop1	cdc18	SPBC2G2.18|ste16	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Kominami K (1997)	9203581	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	overexpression is lethal in a pop1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735196	2539640	2541030	276195	277545	SPBC32F12.09	SPBC337.08c	rum1	ubi4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kominami K (1997)	9203581	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735197	2540013	2541030	276557	277545	SPBC14C8.07c	SPBC337.08c	cdc18	ubi4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kominami K (1997)	9203581	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735198	2540511	2540013	277039	276557	SPBC1718.01	SPBC14C8.07c	pop1	cdc18	SPBC2G2.18|ste16	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kominami K (1997)	9203581	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735203	2539666	2540697	276221	277221	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC20F10.02c	eso1	SPBC20F10.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735204	2539666	2543090	276221	279523	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC1348.01	eso1	SPBC1348.01	-	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735205	2539666	2543515	276221	279933	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC4F10.14c	eso1	btf3	-	btt1|egd1|nac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735206	2539666	2539960	276221	276504	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC15D4.15	eso1	pho2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735207	2539666	2539215	276221	275785	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC285.16c	eso1	msh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735208	2539666	2542667	276221	279120	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC26A3.16	eso1	dph1	-	ucp5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735209	2539666	2539110	276221	275682	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC757.02c	eso1	SPCC757.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735210	2539666	2541395	276221	277904	SPBC16A3.11	SPBP8B7.25	eso1	cyp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735211	2539666	2540825	276221	277343	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC428.08c	eso1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735212	2539666	2542499	276221	278958	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC1F12.04c	eso1	SPAC1F12.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735213	2539666	2542023	276221	278506	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC20H4.10	eso1	ufd2	-	SPAC145.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735214	2539666	2539481	276221	276044	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC622.16c	eso1	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735215	2539666	2543654	276221	280068	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC4H3.04c	eso1	SPAC4H3.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735216	2539666	3361323	276221	280399	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC30D10.04	eso1	swi3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735217	2539666	2543652	276221	280066	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC4H3.03c	eso1	SPAC4H3.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735218	2539666	2539492	276221	276055	SPBC16A3.11	SPCPB16A4.06c	eso1	SPCPB16A4.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735219	2539666	3361193	276221	280269	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC19G7.18c	eso1	SPBC19G7.18c	-	SPBC19G7.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735220	2539666	2541633	276221	278129	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC664.01c	eso1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735221	2539666	2540124	276221	276661	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC16E9.15	eso1	SPBC16E9.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735222	2539666	2541372	276221	277883	SPBC16A3.11	SPBP8B7.28c	eso1	stc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735223	2539666	2540327	276221	276857	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC31F10.07	eso1	lsb5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735224	2539666	2543029	276221	279465	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC11G7.01	eso1	SPAC11G7.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735225	2539666	2543106	276221	279538	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC3A11.13	eso1	SPAC3A11.13	-	SPAC3H5.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735226	2539666	2541374	276221	277885	SPBC16A3.11	SPBPB10D8.06c	eso1	SPBPB10D8.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735227	2539666	2542235	276221	278707	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC18G6.05c	eso1	SPAC18G6.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735228	2539666	2542136	276221	278612	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC17A2.06c	eso1	vps8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735229	2539666	2541555	276221	278054	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC24C9.08	eso1	SPAC24C9.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735230	2539666	2540764	276221	277284	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC19C7.02	eso1	ubr1	-	SPBC32F12.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735231	2539666	2540683	276221	277208	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC19G7.04	eso1	SPBC19G7.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735232	2539666	2539015	276221	275588	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC1183.02	eso1	SPCC1183.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735233	2539666	2539148	276221	275720	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC132.04c	eso1	gdh2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735234	2539666	2540311	276221	276841	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC2G5.04c	eso1	SPBC2G5.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735235	2539666	2542170	276221	278645	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC17G8.13c	eso1	mst2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735236	2539666	3361430	276221	280506	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC2F3.12c	eso1	plp1	-	SPAC2F3.17c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735237	2539666	2542677	276221	279130	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC26F1.10c	eso1	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735238	2539666	2539738	276221	276290	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC17G9.09	eso1	tif213	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735239	2539666	2539726	276221	276278	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC13E7.08c	eso1	leo1	-	SPBC13E7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735240	2539666	2538801	276221	275382	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC285.13c	eso1	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735241	2539666	2539841	276221	276389	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC17D1.05	eso1	SPBC17D1.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735242	2539666	2539870	276221	276416	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC1709.18	eso1	tif452	-	SPBC409.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735243	2539666	2539591	276221	276149	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC777.07	eso1	omh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735244	2539666	2541311	276221	277823	SPBC16A3.11	SPBP8B7.09c	eso1	los1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735245	2539666	2539670	276221	276225	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC13G1.12	eso1	did2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735246	2539666	2541119	276221	277634	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC651.11c	eso1	apm3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735247	2539666	2540402	276221	276930	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC30D10.05c	eso1	SPBC30D10.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735248	2539666	2539050	276221	275623	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC11E10.08	eso1	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735249	2539666	2540599	276221	277125	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC29A3.10c	eso1	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735250	2539666	2539420	276221	275985	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC970.07c	eso1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735251	2539666	2540350	276221	276879	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC317.01	eso1	mbx2	-	pvg4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735252	2539666	2541743	276221	278237	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC22H10.13	eso1	zym1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735253	2539666	2539519	276221	276081	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC364.05	eso1	vps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735254	2539666	2542974	276221	279413	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC11D3.02c	eso1	SPAC11D3.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735255	2539666	2540443	276221	276971	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC2D10.16	eso1	mhf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735256	2539666	2541911	276221	278401	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC212.04c	eso1	SPAC212.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735257	2539666	2540235	276221	276767	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC336.13c	eso1	SPBC336.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735258	2539666	2543287	276221	279712	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC9E9.05	eso1	SPAC9E9.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735259	2539666	2538723	276221	275307	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC31H12.06	eso1	mug111	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735260	2539666	2540385	276221	276914	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC25H2.08c	eso1	mrs2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735261	2539666	2542177	276221	278652	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC17H9.08	eso1	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735262	2539666	2539772	276221	276323	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC1734.05c	eso1	spf31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735263	2539666	2538883	276221	275461	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC970.05	eso1	rpl3601	-	rpl36-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735264	2539666	2539170	276221	275741	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC306.02c	eso1	SPCC306.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735265	2539666	2542791	276221	279240	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC167.04	eso1	pam17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735266	2539666	2542331	276221	278797	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC1834.05	eso1	alg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735267	2539666	2541320	276221	277832	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC1271.03c	eso1	SPBC1271.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735268	2539666	2540168	276221	276703	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC1683.06c	eso1	SPBC1683.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735269	2539666	2543406	276221	279828	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC9.12c	eso1	atp12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735270	2539666	2539995	276221	276539	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC1105.09	eso1	ubc15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735271	2539666	3361556	276221	280632	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC19D5.11c	eso1	ctf8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735272	2539666	2539668	276221	276223	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC11B10.10c	eso1	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735273	2539666	2542182	276221	278657	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC19B12.08	eso1	atg4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735274	2539666	2542124	276221	278600	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC19A8.14	eso1	SPAC19A8.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735275	2539666	2539945	276221	276489	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC119.05c	eso1	SPBC119.05c	-	csh3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735276	2539666	2541736	276221	278230	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC1348.14c	eso1	ght7	-	SPBPB8B6.01c|SPAC1348.14c|SPAP8B6.01c|SPAPB8B6.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735277	2539666	2540270	276221	276801	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC2G2.02	eso1	syj1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735278	2539666	2542775	276221	279224	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC15E1.05c	eso1	ect1	-	SPAC15E1.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735279	2539666	2538741	276221	275324	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC11E10.05c	eso1	ynd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735280	2539666	2542992	276221	279430	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC1071.09c	eso1	SPAC1071.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735281	2539666	2540248	276221	276780	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC336.03	eso1	efc25	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735282	2539666	2542333	276221	278799	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC16E8.13	eso1	SPAC16E8.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735283	2539666	2538732	276221	275316	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC548.07c	eso1	ght1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735284	2539666	2542239	276221	278711	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC18G6.02c	eso1	chp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735285	2539666	2538735	276221	275319	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC70.10	eso1	SPCC70.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735286	2539666	2541100	276221	277615	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC651.04	eso1	SPBC651.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735287	2539666	2540910	276221	277426	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC577.02	eso1	rpl3801	-	rpl38-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735288	2539666	2540886	276221	277403	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC4F6.10	eso1	vps901	-	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735289	2539666	2540456	276221	276984	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC29A3.18	eso1	cyt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735290	2539666	2540930	276221	277446	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC354.10	eso1	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735291	2539666	2541823	276221	278314	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC23H3.15c	eso1	SPAC23H3.15c	-	SPAC25H1.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735292	2539666	2542547	276221	279004	SPBC16A3.11	SPACUNK4.09	eso1	SPACUNK4.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735293	2539666	2541050	276221	277565	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC428.05c	eso1	arg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735294	2539666	2539408	276221	275973	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC576.12c	eso1	mhf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735295	2539666	2542117	276221	278593	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC17A2.11	eso1	SPAC17A2.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735296	2539666	2540558	276221	277085	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC2D10.17	eso1	clr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735297	2539666	2540563	276221	277090	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC25H2.09	eso1	SPBC25H2.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735298	2539666	2539613	276221	276171	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC11C11.11c	eso1	SPBC11C11.11c	-	SPBC3B8.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735299	2539666	2539667	276221	276222	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC13G1.08c	eso1	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735300	2539666	2543507	276221	279925	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC869.09	eso1	SPAC869.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735301	2539666	2539296	276221	275864	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC1235.03	eso1	cue2	-	SPCC1235.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735302	2539666	2541264	276221	277778	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC902.06	eso1	mto2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735303	2539666	2539769	276221	276320	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC1685.08	eso1	cti6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735304	2539666	2542207	276221	278682	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC17H9.10c	eso1	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735305	2539666	2542727	276221	279177	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC26A3.02	eso1	myh1	-	myh	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735306	2539666	2543289	276221	279714	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC9E9.08	eso1	rad26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735307	2539666	2538854	276221	275435	SPBC16A3.11	SPCP1E11.05c	eso1	are2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735308	2539666	2539304	276221	275872	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC584.16c	eso1	SPCC584.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735309	2539666	2538950	276221	275524	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC188.12	eso1	spn6	-	SPCC584.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735310	2539666	2541650	276221	278146	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC14C4.12c	eso1	laf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735311	2539666	2540631	276221	277157	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC25B2.10	eso1	SPBC25B2.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735312	2539666	2539988	276221	276532	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC1271.05c	eso1	SPBC1271.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735313	2539666	2542141	276221	278617	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC17C9.05c	eso1	pmc3	-	med27|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735314	2539666	2540281	276221	276812	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC2G2.14	eso1	csi1	-	SPBC2G2.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735315	2539666	2539046	276221	275619	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC1223.12c	eso1	meu10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735316	2539666	2542432	276221	278894	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC1805.15c	eso1	pub2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735317	2539666	2539316	276221	275882	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC1450.03	eso1	SPCC1450.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735318	2539666	2543509	276221	279927	SPBC16A3.11	SPAPB1E7.07	eso1	glt1	-	gog1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735319	2539666	2540492	276221	277020	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC2D10.13	eso1	est1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735320	2539666	2540883	276221	277400	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC577.06c	eso1	stt4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735321	2539666	2539490	276221	276053	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC364.07	eso1	ser3	-	SPCC364.07|SPCC4G3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735322	2539666	2540432	276221	276960	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC25H2.05	eso1	egd2	-	nac1|ucp15	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735323	2539666	2543346	276221	279768	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC688.14	eso1	set13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735324	2539666	2540024	276221	276568	SPBC16A3.11	SPBP4H10.04	eso1	ppb1	-	SPBC1346.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735325	2539666	2539642	276221	276197	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC1706.01	eso1	tea4	-	wsh3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735326	2539666	2538775	276221	275357	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC23B6.05c	eso1	ssb3	-	rpa3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735327	2539666	2540217	276221	276750	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC4F6.09	eso1	str1	-	SPNCRNA.106	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735328	2539666	2542857	276221	279303	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC144.06	eso1	apl5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735329	2539666	2540161	276221	276696	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC13E7.03c	eso1	SPBC13E7.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735330	2539666	2542851	276221	279297	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC13G7.05	eso1	are1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735331	2539666	2541496	276221	277998	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC23D3.09	eso1	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735332	2539666	2540120	276221	276657	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC1703.12	eso1	ubp9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735333	2539666	2541484	276221	277986	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC23D3.12	eso1	SPAC23D3.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735334	2539666	2541665	276221	278161	SPBC16A3.11	SPAP27G11.16	eso1	SPAP27G11.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735335	2539666	2539309	276221	275876	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC4G3.19	eso1	alp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735336	2539666	2543044	276221	279479	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC3C7.12	eso1	tip1	-	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735337	2539666	2540757	276221	277278	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC20F10.03	eso1	SPBC20F10.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735338	2539666	2538890	276221	275468	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC1393.02c	eso1	spt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735339	2539666	2542764	276221	279214	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC15E1.10	eso1	SPAC15E1.10	-	SPAP7G5.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735340	2539666	2543024	276221	279460	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC1039.02	eso1	SPAC1039.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735341	2539666	2540043	276221	276581	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC1198.12	eso1	mfr1	-	SPBC660.02|fzr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735342	2539666	2538731	276221	275315	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC1393.10	eso1	ctr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735343	2539666	2540199	276221	276732	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC1709.05	eso1	sks2	-	hsc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735344	2539666	2543077	276221	279510	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC806.04c	eso1	SPAC806.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735345	2539666	2541361	276221	277872	SPBC16A3.11	SPBP8B7.10c	eso1	utp16	-	SPBP8B7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735346	2539666	2541192	276221	277706	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC83.17	eso1	SPBC83.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735347	2539666	2541793	276221	278284	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC22H10.02	eso1	SPAC22H10.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735348	2539666	2541444	276221	277949	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC22H10.04	eso1	ppa3	-	SPAC22H10.04|ppg1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735349	2539666	2543207	276221	279636	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC3C7.13c	eso1	SPAC3C7.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735350	2539666	2543297	276221	279722	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC823.16c	eso1	atg1802	-	mug179|atg18b|atg18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735351	2539666	2543460	276221	279880	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC3H5.10	eso1	rpl3202	-	rpl32|rpl32-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735352	2539666	2543561	276221	279977	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC922.04	eso1	SPAC922.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735353	2539666	2538742	276221	275325	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC965.08c	eso1	alr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735354	2539666	2538847	276221	275428	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC594.06c	eso1	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735355	2539666	2539560	276221	276121	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC736.08	eso1	cbf11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735356	2539666	2542000	276221	278484	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC20H4.06c	eso1	SPAC20H4.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735357	2539666	2539551	276221	276112	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC569.05c	eso1	SPCC569.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735358	2539666	2542541	276221	278998	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC1B3.03c	eso1	wis2	-	cyp5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735359	2539666	2543452	276221	279872	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC3G9.04	eso1	ssu72	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735360	2539666	2539671	276221	276226	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC1734.11	eso1	mas5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735361	2539666	2543118	276221	279550	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC3G6.11	eso1	chl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735362	2539666	2543273	276221	279701	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC1002.06c	eso1	bqt2	-	mug18|rec23	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735363	2539666	2539336	276221	275902	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC74.05	eso1	rpl2702	-	rpl27-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735364	2539666	3361391	276221	280467	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC13G6.01c	eso1	rad8	-	SPAC5H10.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735365	2539666	2538694	276221	275279	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC191.09c	eso1	gst1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735366	2539666	2542731	276221	279181	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC5H10.09c	eso1	SPAC5H10.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735367	2539666	2541058	276221	277573	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC3H7.09	eso1	erf2	-	mug142	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735368	2539666	2539494	276221	276057	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC4G3.08	eso1	psk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735369	2539666	2541103	276221	277618	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC651.06	eso1	mug166	-	csa1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735370	2539666	2543109	276221	279541	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC3G6.09c	eso1	tps2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735371	2539666	2539806	276221	276356	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC1711.08	eso1	aha1	-	SPBC1711.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735372	2539666	2542187	276221	278662	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC57A7.09	eso1	SPAC57A7.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735373	2539666	2543211	276221	279640	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC12B10.15c	eso1	SPAC12B10.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735374	2539666	2543593	276221	280008	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC4G9.10	eso1	arg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735375	2539666	2543682	276221	280096	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC637.10c	eso1	rpn10	-	pus1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735376	2539666	2543644	276221	280058	SPBC16A3.11	SPAPB1A10.03	eso1	nxt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735377	2539666	2540975	276221	277491	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC354.12	eso1	gpd3	-	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735378	2539666	2540372	276221	276901	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC31F10.03	eso1	SPBC31F10.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735379	2539666	2539908	276221	276454	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC13E7.06	eso1	msd1	-	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735380	2539666	2541960	276221	278447	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC6G9.15c	eso1	SPAC6G9.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735381	2539666	2539330	276221	275896	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC1753.03c	eso1	rec7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735382	2539666	2542080	276221	278557	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC27D7.03c	eso1	mei2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735383	2539666	2542458	276221	278919	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC30.02c	eso1	SPAC30.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735384	2539666	2542932	276221	279373	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC1039.08	eso1	SPAC1039.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735385	2539666	2541896	276221	278386	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC23H4.16c	eso1	SPAC23H4.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735386	2539666	2541124	276221	277639	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC646.02	eso1	cwf11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735387	2539666	2541026	276221	277541	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC337.09	eso1	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735388	2539666	2539837	276221	276386	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC17G9.12c	eso1	SPBC17G9.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735389	2539666	2542298	276221	278765	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC29A4.02c	eso1	SPAC29A4.02c	-	tef3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735390	2539666	3361543	276221	280619	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC9.13c	eso1	cwf16	-	SPAPJ735.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735391	2539666	2542159	276221	278635	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC1834.09	eso1	mug51	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735392	2539666	2540958	276221	277474	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC409.19c	eso1	SPBC409.19c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735393	2539666	2543234	276221	279662	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC977.11	eso1	SPAC977.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735394	2539666	2539949	276221	276493	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC1703.04	eso1	mlh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735395	2539666	2542596	276221	279050	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC1B3.17	eso1	clr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735396	2539666	2542963	276221	279403	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC1071.03c	eso1	sil1	-	SPAC1071.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735397	2539666	2541336	276221	277847	SPBC16A3.11	SPBP35G2.10	eso1	mit1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735398	2539666	2539951	276221	276495	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC11B10.05c	eso1	rsp1	-	pi006|SPACTOKYO_453.30c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735399	2539666	2539092	276221	275664	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC1259.08	eso1	SPCC1259.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735400	2539666	2540916	276221	277432	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC354.15	eso1	fap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735401	2539666	2540818	276221	277336	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC428.10	eso1	SPBC428.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735402	2539666	2540295	276221	276826	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC3B8.05	eso1	SPBC3B8.05	-	dph1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735403	2539666	2540480	276221	277008	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC2A9.04c	eso1	san1	-	SPBC2A9.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735404	2539666	2542081	276221	278558	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC26H5.04	eso1	SPAC26H5.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735405	2539666	2539184	276221	275755	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC1494.09c	eso1	tfb6	-	SPCC1494.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735406	2539666	2540498	276221	277026	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC27.02c	eso1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735407	2539666	2542091	276221	278568	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC7D4.02c	eso1	sfp47	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735408	2539666	2542475	276221	278935	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC1F12.02c	eso1	SPAC1F12.02c	-	p23fy	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735409	2539666	2543368	276221	279790	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC630.06c	eso1	SPAC630.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735410	2539666	2538907	276221	275484	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC24B10.19c	eso1	nts1	-	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735411	2539666	2539710	276221	276263	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC1683.08	eso1	ght4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735412	2539666	2538797	276221	275378	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC794.07	eso1	lat1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735413	2539666	2538923	276221	275500	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC18.02	eso1	SPCC18.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735414	2539666	3361337	276221	280413	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC1105.01	eso1	rrp12	-	SPBPB7E8.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735415	2539666	2543517	276221	279935	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC3G9.05	eso1	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735416	2539666	2539202	276221	275773	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC162.10	eso1	ppk33	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735417	2539666	2542685	276221	279138	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC26A3.06	eso1	bud23	-	SPAC26A3.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the eso1-G799D mutant	-	BIOGRID
735418	2539666	2542198	276221	278673	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC6F12.09	eso1	rdp1	-	rdr1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	eso1-G799D	-	BIOGRID
735419	2539666	2539420	276221	275985	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC970.07c	eso1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	eso1-G799D	-	BIOGRID
735420	2539666	2541633	276221	278129	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC664.01c	eso1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	eso1-G799D	-	BIOGRID
735421	2542657	2542558	279111	279014	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC1952.07	mis4	rad1	-	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735422	2542657	2541746	279111	278240	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC20G4.04c	mis4	hus1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735423	2542657	2543544	279111	279961	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC664.07c	mis4	rad9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735424	2542657	2541624	279111	278120	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC23C11.15	mis4	pst2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735425	2542657	2541633	279111	278129	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC664.01c	mis4	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735426	2542657	2540821	279111	277339	SPAC31A2.05c	SPBC800.03	mis4	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735427	2542657	2539481	279111	276044	SPAC31A2.05c	SPCC622.16c	mis4	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735428	2542657	2539420	279111	275985	SPAC31A2.05c	SPCC970.07c	mis4	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735429	2542657	2541628	279111	278124	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC110.02	mis4	pds5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735430	2542657	2542967	279111	279407	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC12B10.12c	mis4	rhp41	-	rhp4a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735431	2542657	2541466	279111	277968	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC14C4.06c	mis4	nab2	-	SPAC14C4.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735432	2542657	2542764	279111	279214	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC15E1.10	mis4	SPAC15E1.10	-	SPAP7G5.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735433	2542657	2541573	279111	278070	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC16.04	mis4	dus3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735434	2542657	2542776	279111	279225	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC167.01	mis4	ire1	-	ppk4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735435	2542657	2542782	279111	279231	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC1687.06c	mis4	rpl44	-	rpl28	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735436	2542657	2542324	279111	278790	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC16E8.05c	mis4	mde1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735437	2542657	2542345	279111	278811	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC1705.02	mis4	SPAC1705.02	-	SPAC1F2.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735438	2542657	2542354	279111	278819	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC1782.06c	mis4	phb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735439	2542657	2542286	279111	278754	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC1786.01c	mis4	ptl2	-	SPAC1786.01c|SPAC31G5.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735440	2542657	2542202	279111	278677	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC17C9.15c	mis4	SPAC17C9.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735441	2542657	5802962	279111	858100	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC17D4.01	mis4	pex7	-	SPAC1834.12|SPAP17D4.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735442	2542657	2542289	279111	278757	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC17G6.03	mis4	SPAC17G6.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735443	2542657	2542188	279111	278663	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC17H9.01	mis4	cid16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735444	2542657	2542418	279111	278881	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC1805.07c	mis4	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735445	2542657	2542123	279111	278599	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC18G6.15	mis4	mal3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735446	2542657	3361556	279111	280632	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC19D5.11c	mis4	ctf8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735447	2542657	2542499	279111	278958	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC1F12.04c	mis4	SPAC1F12.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735448	2542657	2542000	279111	278484	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC20H4.06c	mis4	SPAC20H4.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735449	2542657	2541792	279111	278283	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC22E12.19	mis4	snt1	-	SPAC2E12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735450	2542657	2542006	279111	278489	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC23A1.11	mis4	rpl1602	-	rpl16-2|rpl13a-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735451	2542657	2542067	279111	278544	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC23D3.01	mis4	pdp3	-	SPAC23D3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735452	2542657	2541773	279111	278267	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC23H4.02	mis4	ppk9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735453	2542657	2541531	279111	278031	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC25A8.01c	mis4	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735454	2542657	2542701	279111	279154	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC26H5.05	mis4	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735455	2542657	2542075	279111	278552	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC27D7.06	mis4	etf1	-	SPAC27D7.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735456	2542657	2542681	279111	279134	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC27E2.01	mis4	SPAC27E2.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735457	2542657	2541463	279111	277965	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC2F3.02	mis4	SPAC2F3.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735458	2542657	2543046	279111	279481	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC3C7.10	mis4	pex13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735459	2542657	2543164	279111	279595	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC3G6.06c	mis4	rad2	-	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735460	2542657	2543443	279111	279863	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC3H1.12c	mis4	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735461	2542657	2543586	279111	280001	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC458.04c	mis4	dli1	-	dil1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735462	2542657	2543097	279111	279529	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC4A8.04	mis4	isp6	-	prb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735463	2542657	2543624	279111	280038	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC4D7.06c	mis4	SPAC4D7.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735464	2542657	2543605	279111	280020	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC4F10.02	mis4	aap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735465	2542657	2543521	279111	279939	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC4F8.01	mis4	did4	-	SPAC644.03c|vps2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735466	2542657	2543582	279111	279997	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC4H3.06	mis4	SPAC4H3.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735467	2542657	2543340	279111	279763	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC637.03	mis4	SPAC637.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735468	2542657	2541556	279111	278055	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC6G9.10c	mis4	sen1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735469	2542657	2542160	279111	278636	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC8C9.11	mis4	fra2	-	SPAC8C9.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735470	2542657	2542029	279111	278511	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC8E11.02c	mis4	rad24	-	anr5|sam4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735471	2542657	2543287	279111	279712	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC9E9.05	mis4	SPAC9E9.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735472	2542657	2543541	279111	279958	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAPB24D3.07c	mis4	SPAPB24D3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735473	2542657	2543309	279111	279733	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAPB8E5.06c	mis4	rpl302	-	rpl3-2|rpl3-b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735474	2542657	2543316	279111	279740	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAPJ691.02	mis4	SPAPJ691.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735475	2542657	2540105	279111	276642	SPAC31A2.05c	SPBC106.04	mis4	ada1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735476	2542657	2540201	279111	276734	SPAC31A2.05c	SPBC13A2.04c	mis4	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735477	2542657	2539778	279111	276328	SPAC31A2.05c	SPBC15D4.01c	mis4	klp9	-	SPBC2D10.21c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735478	2542657	2539635	279111	276191	SPAC31A2.05c	SPBC17D11.03c	mis4	SPBC17D11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735479	2542657	2540609	279111	277135	SPAC31A2.05c	SPBC19G7.03c	mis4	rps3002	-	rps30|rps30-2|ysprs30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735480	2542657	2540726	279111	277249	SPAC31A2.05c	SPBC216.01c	mis4	psy2	-	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735481	2542657	2540309	279111	276839	SPAC31A2.05c	SPBC21B10.13c	mis4	yox1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735482	2542657	2540629	279111	277155	SPAC31A2.05c	SPBC21D10.09c	mis4	rkr1	-	SPBC21D10.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735483	2542657	2540551	279111	277078	SPAC31A2.05c	SPBC23E6.01c	mis4	cxr1	-	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735484	2542657	2540587	279111	277113	SPAC31A2.05c	SPBC23G7.15c	mis4	rpp202	-	rpp2-2|rpa4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735485	2542657	2540348	279111	276877	SPAC31A2.05c	SPBC29A10.05	mis4	exo1	-	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735486	2542657	2540354	279111	276883	SPAC31A2.05c	SPBC29A3.13	mis4	pdp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735487	2542657	2540969	279111	277485	SPAC31A2.05c	SPBC30B4.01c	mis4	wsc1	-	SPBC3D6.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735488	2542657	3361323	279111	280399	SPAC31A2.05c	SPBC30D10.04	mis4	swi3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735489	2542657	2540322	279111	276852	SPAC31A2.05c	SPBC31F10.10c	mis4	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735490	2542657	2540231	279111	276763	SPAC31A2.05c	SPBC336.14c	mis4	ppk26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735491	2542657	2541026	279111	277541	SPAC31A2.05c	SPBC337.09	mis4	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735492	2542657	2541072	279111	277587	SPAC31A2.05c	SPBC365.08c	mis4	SPBC365.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735493	2542657	2540908	279111	277424	SPAC31A2.05c	SPBC3B8.03	mis4	SPBC3B8.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735494	2542657	2541021	279111	277536	SPAC31A2.05c	SPBC3B8.10c	mis4	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735495	2542657	2540958	279111	277474	SPAC31A2.05c	SPBC409.19c	mis4	SPBC409.19c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735496	2542657	2540606	279111	277132	SPAC31A2.05c	SPBC428.03c	mis4	pho4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735497	2542657	2541101	279111	277616	SPAC31A2.05c	SPBC609.02	mis4	ptn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735498	2542657	2541179	279111	277693	SPAC31A2.05c	SPBC6B1.08c	mis4	ofd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735499	2542657	2540918	279111	277434	SPAC31A2.05c	SPBC800.02	mis4	whi5	-	mug54	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735500	2542657	2541008	279111	277523	SPAC31A2.05c	SPBC83.11	mis4	pet2	-	SPBC83.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735501	2542657	2541284	279111	277797	SPAC31A2.05c	SPBC947.08c	mis4	hip4	-	hpc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735502	2542657	2538971	279111	275545	SPAC31A2.05c	SPCC1322.10	mis4	SPCC1322.10	-	pwp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735503	2542657	2539178	279111	275749	SPAC31A2.05c	SPCC1682.14	mis4	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735504	2542657	2538806	279111	275387	SPAC31A2.05c	SPCC1840.09	mis4	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735505	2542657	2539120	279111	275692	SPAC31A2.05c	SPCC23B6.04c	mis4	SPCC23B6.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735506	2542657	2539527	279111	276089	SPAC31A2.05c	SPCC338.16	mis4	pof3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735507	2542657	2539560	279111	276121	SPAC31A2.05c	SPCC736.08	mis4	cbf11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735508	2542657	2539486	279111	276049	SPAC31A2.05c	SPCC74.09	mis4	mug24	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735509	2542657	2539434	279111	275997	SPAC31A2.05c	SPCC757.09c	mis4	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735510	2542657	2538986	279111	275560	SPAC31A2.05c	SPCC895.06	mis4	elp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735511	2542657	2538792	279111	275373	SPAC31A2.05c	SPCP1E11.10	mis4	SPCP1E11.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735512	2542657	2539574	279111	276134	SPAC31A2.05c	SPCPB16A4.04c	mis4	trm8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	significant negative interaction with the mis4-242 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735513	2539666	2541628	276221	278124	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC110.02	eso1	pds5	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion can partially rescue the eso1-G799D mutant temperature sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
735514	2539666	2540860	276221	277377	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC428.17c	eso1	wpl1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion can partially rescue the eso1-G799D mutant temperature sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
735515	2539666	2538890	276221	275468	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC1393.02c	eso1	spt2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion can partially rescue the eso1-G799D mutant temperature sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
735516	2539666	2542126	276221	278602	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC1B3.05	eso1	not3	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue|heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion can partially rescue the eso1-G799D mutant temperature sensitivity and lagging chromosome defect	-	BIOGRID
735517	2539666	2539249	276221	275819	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC1450.05c	eso1	rox3	-	med19	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Chen Z (2012)	23050226	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue|heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion can partially rescue the eso1-G799D mutant temperature sensitivity and lagging chromosome defect	-	BIOGRID
735519	2541512	2539004	278013	275578	SPAC11E3.08c	SPCC4G3.05c	nse6	mus81	-	slx3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Wehrkamp-Richter S (2012)	22855558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|resistance to chemicals|sporulation efficiency	double mutants show increased sensitivity to CPT (CHEBI: 27656 CID: 24360) and decreased spore viability	-	BIOGRID
735520	2541512	2542150	278013	278626	SPAC11E3.08c	SPAC17A5.11	nse6	rec12	-	spo11	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Wehrkamp-Richter S (2012)	22855558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:partial rescue	Deletion of rec12 rescued the mus81/nse6 null mutant meiotic ascus phenotype, but only partially rescued the low spore viability phenotype|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
735521	2539004	2542150	275578	278626	SPCC4G3.05c	SPAC17A5.11	mus81	rec12	slx3	spo11	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Wehrkamp-Richter S (2012)	22855558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:partial rescue	Deletion of rec12 rescued the mus81/nse6 null mutant meiotic ascus phenotype, but only partially rescued the low spore viability phenotype|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
735522	2541512	2542106	278013	278582	SPAC11E3.08c	SPAC8E11.03c	nse6	dmc1	-	dmp1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Wehrkamp-Richter S (2012)	22855558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:partial rescue	deletion of dmc1 and rad51 partially rescues the asci formation defect seen upon deletion of nse6|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
735523	2541512	2543580	278013	279995	SPAC11E3.08c	SPAC644.14c	nse6	rad51	-	rhp51	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Wehrkamp-Richter S (2012)	22855558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:partial rescue	deletion of dmc1 and rad51 partially rescues the asci formation defect seen upon deletion of nse6|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
735524	2541512	945174	278013	849560	SPAC11E3.08c	b0550	nse6	rusA	-	ECK0541|JW0538|rus|ybcP	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wehrkamp-Richter S (2012)	22855558	284812	511145	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:partial rescue	RusA expression significantly rescues the meiotic defects of nse6, nse5 and mus81 mutant cells, yielding asci that often contained a wild-type complement of four spores	-	BIOGRID
735525	2540911	945174	277427	849560	SPBC651.10	b0550	nse5	rusA	-	ECK0541|JW0538|rus|ybcP	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wehrkamp-Richter S (2012)	22855558	284812	511145	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:partial rescue	RusA expression significantly rescues the meiotic defects of nse6, nse5 and mus81 mutant cells, yielding asci that often contained a wild-type complement of four spores	-	BIOGRID
735526	2539004	945174	275578	849560	SPCC4G3.05c	b0550	mus81	rusA	slx3	ECK0541|JW0538|rus|ybcP	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Wehrkamp-Richter S (2012)	22855558	284812	511145	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:partial rescue	RusA expression significantly rescues the meiotic defects of nse6, nse5 and mus81 mutant cells, yielding asci that often contained a wild-type complement of four spores	-	BIOGRID
735576	2541030	2542080	277545	278557	SPBC337.08c	SPAC27D7.03c	ubi4	mei2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kitamura K (2001)	11702950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	likely ubiquitin conjugate	-	BIOGRID
735577	2542029	2540258	278511	276789	SPAC8E11.02c	SPBC32C12.02	rad24	ste11	anr5|sam4	aff1|stex	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kitamura K (2001)	11702950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:wild type	deletion of ste11 inhibits the accumulation if Mei2 seen in a rad24 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735578	2540258	2542029	276789	278511	SPBC32C12.02	SPAC8E11.02c	ste11	rad24	aff1|stex	anr5|sam4	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kitamura K (2001)	11702950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:wild type	overexpression of rad24 inhibits the accumulation of Mei2 seen upon overexpression of Ste11	-	BIOGRID
735579	2540258	2542029	276789	278511	SPBC32C12.02	SPAC8E11.02c	ste11	rad24	aff1|stex	anr5|sam4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kitamura K (2001)	11702950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735580	2542029	2540258	278511	276789	SPAC8E11.02c	SPBC32C12.02	rad24	ste11	anr5|sam4	aff1|stex	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kitamura K (2001)	11702950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735603	2542313	2540115	278779	276652	SPAC16A10.07c	SPBC1778.02	taz1	rap1	myb|myb1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Fujita I (2012)	22959349	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735604	2540694	2540115	277218	276652	SPBC19C7.10	SPBC1778.02	bqt4	rap1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Fujita I (2012)	22959349	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735605	2541973	2540115	278458	276652	SPAC6G9.13c	SPBC1778.02	bqt1	rap1	mug23|rec26	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Fujita I (2012)	22959349	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735606	2543273	2540115	279701	276652	SPAC1002.06c	SPBC1778.02	bqt2	rap1	mug18|rec23	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Fujita I (2012)	22959349	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735607	2542244	2540115	278714	276652	SPAC19G12.13c	SPBC1778.02	poz1	rap1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Fujita I (2012)	22959349	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735640	2539997	2541726	276541	278220	SPBC1604.14c	SPAC22H10.07	shk1	scd2	orb2|pak1	ral3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chang E (1999)	10567532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology:partial rescue	Overexpression of scd2 partially rescues the cellular morphology defect due to overexpression of shk1R1 subdomain.	-	BIOGRID
735649	2540766	2541867	277286	278357	SPBC19C2.02	SPAC22E12.14c	pmt1	sck2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Becker M (2012)	23074192	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA modification:partial rescue	deletion of sck2 partially inhibits the tRNA methylation induced by pmt1 overexpression	-	BIOGRID
735662	2542264	2541917	278733	278407	SPAC17D4.04	SPAC23C4.17	trm401	trm402	SPAC17D4.04|SPAC458.01|trm4|trm4a	SPAC23C4.17|trm4|trm4b	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Becker M (2012)	23074192	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA modification	double mutants show a loss of tRNA methylation in tRNA-Asp	-	BIOGRID
735699	2541916	2538762	278406	275345	SPAC23C4.19	SPCC306.04c	spt5	set1	-	kmt2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sanso M (2012)	22876190	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology	double mutants show aberrant septation	-	BIOGRID
735700	2539523	2540239	276085	276771	SPCC622.09	SPBC32H8.10	htb1	cdk9	-	SPACTOKYO_453.22	Co-localization	physical	Sanso M (2012)	22876190	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	ChIP|H2Bub1 enhances Cdk9 recruitment and Spt5 phosphorylation at transcribed genes.	-	BIOGRID
735701	2539523	2540239	276085	276771	SPCC622.09	SPBC32H8.10	htb1	cdk9	-	SPACTOKYO_453.22	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sanso M (2012)	22876190	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	double mutants show decreased sensitivity to 3-MB-PP1	-	BIOGRID
735702	2540471	2540239	276999	276771	SPBC19F8.07	SPBC32H8.10	mcs6	cdk9	cdk7|crk1|mop1	SPACTOKYO_453.22	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanso M (2012)	22876190	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	data not shown|double mutants show increased sensitivity to 3-MB-PP1	-	BIOGRID
735703	2541672	2540239	278168	276771	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC32H8.10	lsk1	cdk9	-	SPACTOKYO_453.22	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanso M (2012)	22876190	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	data not shown|double mutants show increased sensitivity to 3-MB-PP1	-	BIOGRID
735704	2539523	2540239	276085	276771	SPCC622.09	SPBC32H8.10	htb1	cdk9	-	SPACTOKYO_453.22	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sanso M (2012)	22876190	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology:wild type|protein/peptide distribution:wild type	The cdk9-T212A mutation caused a global redistribution of RNAPII occupancy that was essentially opposite to that observed in the htb1-K119R strain|cdk9/spt5/htb1 triple mutants show almost complete rescue of htb1-K119 morphology defects|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
735705	2539523	2541916	276085	278406	SPCC622.09	SPAC23C4.19	htb1	spt5	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sanso M (2012)	22876190	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology:wild type	cdk9/spt5/htb1 triple mutants show almost complete rescue of htb1-K119 morphology defects|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
735706	2538930	2539403	275506	275968	SPCC188.13c	SPCC736.11	dcr1	ago1	SPCC584.10c	csp9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Iida T (2012)	22989756	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type	overexpression of ago1+ rescued the checkpoint defect of a dcr1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
735707	2539403	2542537	275968	278994	SPCC736.11	SPAC19D5.04	ago1	ptr1	csp9	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Iida T (2012)	22989756	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735708	2542537	2539403	278994	275968	SPAC19D5.04	SPCC736.11	ptr1	ago1	-	csp9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Iida T (2012)	22989756	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735709	2539403	2542537	275968	278994	SPCC736.11	SPAC19D5.04	ago1	ptr1	csp9	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Iida T (2012)	22989756	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735710	2539403	2542862	275968	279308	SPCC736.11	SPAC140.03	ago1	arb1	csp9	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Iida T (2012)	22989756	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735711	2539403	2542879	275968	279324	SPCC736.11	SPAC13G7.07	ago1	arb2	csp9	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Iida T (2012)	22989756	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735714	2543592	2540505	280007	277033	SPAC4F10.18	SPBC3B9.16c	nup37	nup120	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Bilokapic S (2012)	22955883	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735715	2540543	2540505	277070	277033	SPBC29A10.06c	SPBC3B9.16c	ely5	nup120	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Bilokapic S (2012)	22955883	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735716	2543592	2540505	280007	277033	SPAC4F10.18	SPBC3B9.16c	nup37	nup120	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Bilokapic S (2012)	22955883	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	interaction determined by size exclusion chromatography	-	BIOGRID
735717	2540505	2540543	277033	277070	SPBC3B9.16c	SPBC29A10.06c	nup120	ely5	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Bilokapic S (2012)	22955883	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735718	2540505	2540543	277033	277070	SPBC3B9.16c	SPBC29A10.06c	nup120	ely5	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bilokapic S (2012)	22955883	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735719	2540505	2543592	277033	280007	SPBC3B9.16c	SPAC4F10.18	nup120	nup37	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Bilokapic S (2012)	22955883	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735720	2540505	2543592	277033	280007	SPBC3B9.16c	SPAC4F10.18	nup120	nup37	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Bilokapic S (2012)	22955883	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735721	2541547	2540716	278047	277239	SPAC1486.05	SPBC215.15	nup189	sec13	nup189C|nup189N|nup96|nup98	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Bilokapic S (2012)	22955883	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735722	2539829	2541682	276378	278178	SPBC17G9.04c	SPAC15F9.02	nup85	seh1	ptr5	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Bilokapic S (2012)	22955883	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735725	2540115	2543273	276652	279701	SPBC1778.02	SPAC1002.06c	rap1	bqt2	-	mug18|rec23	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Fujita I (2012)	23133674	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735726	2540115	2542244	276652	278714	SPBC1778.02	SPAC19G12.13c	rap1	poz1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Fujita I (2012)	23133674	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735727	2540115	2542313	276652	278779	SPBC1778.02	SPAC16A10.07c	rap1	taz1	-	myb|myb1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Fujita I (2012)	23133674	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735728	2540115	2541973	276652	278458	SPBC1778.02	SPAC6G9.13c	rap1	bqt1	-	mug23|rec26	Two-hybrid	physical	Fujita I (2012)	23133674	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735729	2540115	2543273	276652	279701	SPBC1778.02	SPAC1002.06c	rap1	bqt2	-	mug18|rec23	Two-hybrid	physical	Fujita I (2012)	23133674	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735730	2540115	2542244	276652	278714	SPBC1778.02	SPAC19G12.13c	rap1	poz1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Fujita I (2012)	23133674	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735731	2540115	2542313	276652	278779	SPBC1778.02	SPAC16A10.07c	rap1	taz1	-	myb|myb1	Two-hybrid	physical	Fujita I (2012)	23133674	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735732	2540505	2543592	277033	280007	SPBC3B9.16c	SPAC4F10.18	nup120	nup37	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Liu X (2012)	23019579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735733	2540505	2543592	277033	280007	SPBC3B9.16c	SPAC4F10.18	nup120	nup37	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Liu X (2012)	23019579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735885	2540316	2541306	276846	277818	SPBC27B12.08	SPBP16F5.07	sip1	apm1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yu Y (2012)	23028933	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein secretion:wild type|protein/peptide distribution:wild type|vacuolar morphology:wild type	apm1 overexpression suppressed the defects in acid phosphatase secretion, protein localization and vacuaole fusion seen in sip1-i4 cells	-	BIOGRID
735886	2540316	2541306	276846	277818	SPBC27B12.08	SPBP16F5.07	sip1	apm1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Yu Y (2012)	23028933	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735887	2540316	2541255	276846	277769	SPBC27B12.08	SPBC947.02	sip1	apl2	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Yu Y (2012)	23028933	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735888	2540316	2539311	276846	275878	SPBC27B12.08	SPCP1E11.06	sip1	apl4	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Yu Y (2012)	23028933	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735890	2540316	2541306	276846	277818	SPBC27B12.08	SPBP16F5.07	sip1	apm1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Yu Y (2012)	23028933	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735891	2540316	2541255	276846	277769	SPBC27B12.08	SPBC947.02	sip1	apl2	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Yu Y (2012)	23028933	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735892	2540316	2539311	276846	275878	SPBC27B12.08	SPCP1E11.06	sip1	apl4	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Yu Y (2012)	23028933	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
735984	2539943	2541755	276487	278249	SPBC14F5.05c	SPAC2F7.11	sam1	nrd1	-	msa2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Jeong HT (2004)	15277777	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	data not shown	-	BIOGRID
735985	2539943	2542861	276487	279307	SPBC14F5.05c	SPAC13G7.13c	sam1	msa1	-	SPAC6C3.01c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Jeong HT (2004)	15277777	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	data not shown	-	BIOGRID
735995	2539205	2541603	275775	278100	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC1F5.04c	mid1	cdc12	dmf1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Saha S (2012)	22918943	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology|cytokinesis	double mutants show increased defects in the assembly of strands or contractile rings	-	BIOGRID
736055	2539817	2541045	276367	277560	SPBC146.03c	SPBC543.03c	cut3	pku80	smc4	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tanaka A (2012)	23084836	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736056	2539090	2541319	275662	277831	SPCC126.02c	SPBP4H10.06c	pku70	cut14	-	smc2	Co-localization	physical	Tanaka A (2012)	23084836	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	ChIP	-	BIOGRID
736057	2541045	2541319	277560	277831	SPBC543.03c	SPBP4H10.06c	pku80	cut14	-	smc2	Co-localization	physical	Tanaka A (2012)	23084836	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	ChIP	-	BIOGRID
736153	2540902	2538930	277418	275506	SPBC582.04c	SPCC188.13c	dsh1	dcr1	SPBC582.04c	SPCC584.10c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kawakami K (2012)	22895252	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736154	2540902	2542198	277418	278673	SPBC582.04c	SPAC6F12.09	dsh1	rdp1	SPBC582.04c	rdr1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kawakami K (2012)	22895252	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736155	2542198	2538930	278673	275506	SPAC6F12.09	SPCC188.13c	rdp1	dcr1	rdr1	SPCC584.10c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kawakami K (2012)	22895252	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736156	2540902	2539403	277418	275968	SPBC582.04c	SPCC736.11	dsh1	ago1	SPBC582.04c	csp9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kawakami K (2012)	22895252	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736157	2540902	2540735	277418	277258	SPBC582.04c	SPBC83.03c	dsh1	tas3	SPBC582.04c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kawakami K (2012)	22895252	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736159	2540902	2538930	277418	275506	SPBC582.04c	SPCC188.13c	dsh1	dcr1	SPBC582.04c	SPCC584.10c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kawakami K (2012)	22895252	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:partial rescue|silencing:partial rescue	overexpression of dcr1 allows the formation of siRNA in a dsh1 or rdp1 mutant background and partially rescues silencing defects	-	BIOGRID
736160	2542198	2538930	278673	275506	SPAC6F12.09	SPCC188.13c	rdp1	dcr1	rdr1	SPCC584.10c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kawakami K (2012)	22895252	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:partial rescue|silencing:partial rescue	overexpression of dcr1 allows the formation of siRNA in a dsh1 or rdp1 mutant background and partially rescues silencing defects	-	BIOGRID
736161	2540902	2542198	277418	278673	SPBC582.04c	SPAC6F12.09	dsh1	rdp1	SPBC582.04c	rdr1	Co-localization	physical	Kawakami K (2012)	22895252	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	ChIP	-	BIOGRID
736162	2540902	2540825	277418	277343	SPBC582.04c	SPBC428.08c	dsh1	clr4	SPBC582.04c	-	Co-localization	physical	Kawakami K (2012)	22895252	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	ChIP	-	BIOGRID
736163	2542198	2540902	278673	277418	SPAC6F12.09	SPBC582.04c	rdp1	dsh1	rdr1	SPBC582.04c	Co-localization	physical	Kawakami K (2012)	22895252	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	ChIP	-	BIOGRID
736164	2542198	2540825	278673	277343	SPAC6F12.09	SPBC428.08c	rdp1	clr4	rdr1	-	Co-localization	physical	Kawakami K (2012)	22895252	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	ChIP	-	BIOGRID
736234	2539024	2540258	275597	276789	SPCC1902.01	SPBC32C12.02	gaf1	ste11	SPCC417.01c	aff1|stex	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kim L (2012)	22900017	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation efficiency:wild type|sporulation:wild type	the phenotype of the gaf1 null mutant, accelerated initiation of sporulation and elevated sporulation efficiency, is masked by the ste11 deletion mutation, causing impaired sporulation	-	BIOGRID
736265	2540728	3361323	277251	280399	SPBC216.06c	SPBC30D10.04	swi1	swi3	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Noguchi C (2012)	22952839	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	ChIP|Swi1 is required for the efficient association of Swi3 with chromatin	-	BIOGRID
736272	2540728	3361323	277251	280399	SPBC216.06c	SPBC30D10.04	swi1	swi3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Noguchi C (2012)	22952839	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736273	2540728	3361323	277251	280399	SPBC216.06c	SPBC30D10.04	swi1	swi3	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Noguchi C (2012)	22952839	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736276	2542363	2543064	278827	279497	SPAC1783.05	SPAC3G6.01	hrp1	hrp3	chd1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hennig BP (2012)	23032292	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation|chromosome/plasmid maintenance|protein/peptide distribution	double mutants show an increase in levels of antisense transcripts and disruption of nucleosome organization in coding regions	-	BIOGRID
736295	2539513	2540560	276075	277087	SPCC645.05c	SPBC2D10.14c	myo2	myo51	rng5	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Huang J (2012)	23185032	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology	double mutants show a loss of actin cable mobility	-	BIOGRID
736296	2541603	2539487	278100	276050	SPAC1F5.04c	SPCC895.05	cdc12	for3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Huang J (2012)	23185032	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology	double mutants show a complete loss of mitotic and interphase actin cables	-	BIOGRID
736297	2542632	2539487	279086	276050	SPAC24H6.05	SPCC895.05	cdc25	for3	sal2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Huang J (2012)	23185032	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology	double mutants show increased defects in actin cable assembly	-	BIOGRID
736415	2539007	2540737	275580	277260	SPCC1281.01	SPBC19G7.05c	ags1	bgs1	SPCC17A7.01|SPCC338.01c|mok1	cps1|drc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Cortes JC (2012)	22891259	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736416	2540737	2539007	277260	275580	SPBC19G7.05c	SPCC1281.01	bgs1	ags1	cps1|drc1	SPCC17A7.01|SPCC338.01c|mok1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Cortes JC (2012)	22891259	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736417	2539958	2539119	276502	275691	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC1223.13	zfs1	cbf12	moc4	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Wells ML (2012)	22907753	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type|flocculation:wild type	deletion of cbf12 abolishes the abnormal flocculation and elevated trasncription of some target genes seen in a zfs1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
736418	2539958	2540935	276502	277451	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC359.04c	zfs1	pfl7	moc4	SPBC359.04c	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Wells ML (2012)	22907753	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736419	2539958	2539339	276502	275905	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC1494.03	zfs1	arz1	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Wells ML (2012)	22907753	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736420	2539958	9407219	276502	1028582	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC8E4.12c	zfs1	ecl3	moc4	SPNG1995-96	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Wells ML (2012)	22907753	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736421	2539958	2543237	276502	279665	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC6B12.02c	zfs1	mus7	moc4	mms22	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Wells ML (2012)	22907753	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736422	2539958	2543446	276502	279866	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC4F8.10c	zfs1	stg1	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Wells ML (2012)	22907753	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736423	2539958	2542416	276502	278880	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC589.03c	zfs1	SPAC589.03c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Wells ML (2012)	22907753	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736424	2539958	2539119	276502	275691	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC1223.13	zfs1	cbf12	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Wells ML (2012)	22907753	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736427	2541724	2542018	278218	278501	SPAC5H10.12c	SPAC5H10.11	SPAC5H10.12c	gmh1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ohashi T (2012)	22988247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	deletion of otg1-otg3 in a 7GalT null background increases growth defects and temperature sensitivity|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
736428	2541724	2542227	278218	278700	SPAC5H10.12c	SPAC5H10.13c	SPAC5H10.12c	gmh2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ohashi T (2012)	22988247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	deletion of otg1-otg3 in a 7GalT null background increases growth defects and temperature sensitivity|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
736429	2541724	2541748	278218	278242	SPAC5H10.12c	SPAC22E12.06c	SPAC5H10.12c	gmh3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ohashi T (2012)	22988247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	deletion of otg1-otg3 in a 7GalT null background increases growth defects and temperature sensitivity|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
736430	2541724	2539101	278218	275673	SPAC5H10.12c	SPCC736.04c	SPAC5H10.12c	gma12	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ohashi T (2012)	22988247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	deletion of otg1-otg3 in a 7GalT null background increases growth defects and temperature sensitivity|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
736431	2541724	2541250	278218	277764	SPAC5H10.12c	SPBC8D2.17	SPAC5H10.12c	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ohashi T (2012)	22988247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	deletion of otg1-otg3 in a 7GalT null background increases growth defects and temperature sensitivity|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
736432	2541724	2540001	278218	276545	SPAC5H10.12c	SPBC1289.13c	SPAC5H10.12c	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ohashi T (2012)	22988247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	deletion of otg1-otg3 in a 7GalT null background increases growth defects and temperature sensitivity|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
736433	2541724	2543384	278218	279806	SPAC5H10.12c	SPAC637.06	SPAC5H10.12c	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ohashi T (2012)	22988247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	deletion of otg1-otg3 in a 7GalT null background increases growth defects and temperature sensitivity|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
736434	2541006	2542018	277521	278501	SPBC4C3.08	SPAC5H10.11	mug136	gmh1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ohashi T (2012)	22988247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	deletion of otg1-otg3 in a 7GalT null background increases growth defects and temperature sensitivity|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
736435	2541006	2542227	277521	278700	SPBC4C3.08	SPAC5H10.13c	mug136	gmh2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ohashi T (2012)	22988247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	deletion of otg1-otg3 in a 7GalT null background increases growth defects and temperature sensitivity|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
736436	2541006	2541748	277521	278242	SPBC4C3.08	SPAC22E12.06c	mug136	gmh3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ohashi T (2012)	22988247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	deletion of otg1-otg3 in a 7GalT null background increases growth defects and temperature sensitivity|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
736437	2541006	2539101	277521	275673	SPBC4C3.08	SPCC736.04c	mug136	gma12	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ohashi T (2012)	22988247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	deletion of otg1-otg3 in a 7GalT null background increases growth defects and temperature sensitivity|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
736438	2541006	2541250	277521	277764	SPBC4C3.08	SPBC8D2.17	mug136	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ohashi T (2012)	22988247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	deletion of otg1-otg3 in a 7GalT null background increases growth defects and temperature sensitivity|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
736439	2541006	2540001	277521	276545	SPBC4C3.08	SPBC1289.13c	mug136	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ohashi T (2012)	22988247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	deletion of otg1-otg3 in a 7GalT null background increases growth defects and temperature sensitivity|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
736440	2541006	2543384	277521	279806	SPBC4C3.08	SPAC637.06	mug136	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ohashi T (2012)	22988247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	deletion of otg1-otg3 in a 7GalT null background increases growth defects and temperature sensitivity|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
736441	2540859	2542018	277376	278501	SPBC4C3.09	SPAC5H10.11	SPBC4C3.09	gmh1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ohashi T (2012)	22988247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	deletion of otg1-otg3 in a 7GalT null background increases growth defects and temperature sensitivity|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
736442	2540859	2542227	277376	278700	SPBC4C3.09	SPAC5H10.13c	SPBC4C3.09	gmh2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ohashi T (2012)	22988247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	deletion of otg1-otg3 in a 7GalT null background increases growth defects and temperature sensitivity|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
736443	2540859	2541748	277376	278242	SPBC4C3.09	SPAC22E12.06c	SPBC4C3.09	gmh3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ohashi T (2012)	22988247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	deletion of otg1-otg3 in a 7GalT null background increases growth defects and temperature sensitivity|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
736444	2540859	2539101	277376	275673	SPBC4C3.09	SPCC736.04c	SPBC4C3.09	gma12	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ohashi T (2012)	22988247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	deletion of otg1-otg3 in a 7GalT null background increases growth defects and temperature sensitivity|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
736445	2540859	2541250	277376	277764	SPBC4C3.09	SPBC8D2.17	SPBC4C3.09	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ohashi T (2012)	22988247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	deletion of otg1-otg3 in a 7GalT null background increases growth defects and temperature sensitivity|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
736446	2540859	2540001	277376	276545	SPBC4C3.09	SPBC1289.13c	SPBC4C3.09	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ohashi T (2012)	22988247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	deletion of otg1-otg3 in a 7GalT null background increases growth defects and temperature sensitivity|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
736447	2540859	2543384	277376	279806	SPBC4C3.09	SPAC637.06	SPBC4C3.09	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ohashi T (2012)	22988247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	deletion of otg1-otg3 in a 7GalT null background increases growth defects and temperature sensitivity|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
736448	2541724	2540859	278218	277376	SPAC5H10.12c	SPBC4C3.09	SPAC5H10.12c	SPBC4C3.09	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ohashi T (2012)	22988247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	genetic complex|otg1/otg2/otg3 triple mutants show a loss of tetrasaccharides containing an alpha1,3-Gal residue	-	BIOGRID
736449	2541006	2540859	277521	277376	SPBC4C3.08	SPBC4C3.09	mug136	SPBC4C3.09	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ohashi T (2012)	22988247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	genetic complex|otg1/otg2/otg3 triple mutants show a loss of tetrasaccharides containing an alpha1,3-Gal residue	-	BIOGRID
736450	2541724	2541006	278218	277521	SPAC5H10.12c	SPBC4C3.08	SPAC5H10.12c	mug136	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ohashi T (2012)	22988247	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	genetic complex|otg1/otg2/otg3 triple mutants show a loss of tetrasaccharides containing an alpha1,3-Gal residue	-	BIOGRID
736576	2541281	2541466	277794	277968	SPBC902.04	SPAC14C4.06c	rmn1	nab2	SPBC902.04	SPAC14C4.06c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Cho YS (2012)	22936388	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
736577	2541281	2540727	277794	277250	SPBC902.04	SPBC1921.03c	rmn1	mex67	SPBC902.04	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Cho YS (2012)	22936388	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
736578	2541281	2539741	277794	276293	SPBC902.04	SPBC16A3.05c	rmn1	rae1	SPBC902.04	cut21	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Cho YS (2012)	22936388	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736580	2543064	2541858	279497	278348	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC23H4.12	hrp3	alp13	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Shim YS (2012)	22990236	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	double mutants show a synergistic increase in antisense transcripts|double mutants show an increase in centromeric repeat transcript levels	-	BIOGRID
736581	2543064	2542070	279497	278547	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC29B12.02c	hrp3	set2	-	kmt3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Shim YS (2012)	22990236	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	double mutants show a synergistic increase in antisense transcripts	-	BIOGRID
736586	2543064	2541633	279497	278129	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC664.01c	hrp3	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Shim YS (2012)	22990236	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736587	2543064	2540821	279497	277339	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC800.03	hrp3	clr3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Shim YS (2012)	22990236	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	double mutants show an increase in centromeric repeat transcript levels	-	BIOGRID
736588	2543064	2540825	279497	277343	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC428.08c	hrp3	clr4	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Shim YS (2012)	22990236	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	double mutants show an increase in centromeric repeat transcript levels	-	BIOGRID
736596	2539082	2541030	275654	277545	SPCC126.03	SPBC337.08c	pus1	ubi4	lps1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Medina B (2012)	23038266	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736597	2540481	2541030	277009	277545	SPBC2D10.12	SPBC337.08c	rhp23	ubi4	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Medina B (2012)	23038266	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736598	2540481	2539082	277009	275654	SPBC2D10.12	SPCC126.03	rhp23	pus1	-	lps1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Medina B (2012)	23038266	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
736599	2543271	2543131	279699	279563	SPAC1002.08c	SPAC12G12.04	mtf1	mcp60	-	hsp60	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sun W (2012)	23035257	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736600	2543271	2539780	279699	276330	SPAC1002.08c	SPBC1711.06	mtf1	rpl401	-	rpl4|rpl4-1|rpl4-2|rpl402	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sun W (2012)	23035257	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736601	2543271	2539035	279699	275608	SPAC1002.08c	SPCC794.09c	mtf1	tef101	-	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sun W (2012)	23035257	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736602	2543271	2543131	279699	279563	SPAC1002.08c	SPAC12G12.04	mtf1	mcp60	-	hsp60	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Sun W (2012)	23035257	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736603	2539971	2538762	276515	275345	SPBC1105.04c	SPCC306.04c	cbp1	set1	abp1	kmt2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lorenz DR (2012)	22907751	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	double mutants show a modest increase in Tf2 transcription compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
736604	2539923	2540009	276467	276553	SPBC1539.04	SPBC16G5.05c	tts1	scs2	-	SPBC16G5.05c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Zhang D (2012)	23041194	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology:partial rescue	genetic complex|the severe division-site positioning defects in the tts1/rtn1/yop1 deletion genetic background were largely alleviated by the loss of ER-PM tethering by deletion of scs2/scs22	-	BIOGRID
736605	3361269	2540009	280345	276553	SPBC31A8.01c	SPBC16G5.05c	rtn1	scs2	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	SPBC16G5.05c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Zhang D (2012)	23041194	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology:partial rescue	genetic complex|the severe division-site positioning defects in the tts1/rtn1/yop1 deletion genetic background were largely alleviated by the loss of ER-PM tethering by deletion of scs2/scs22	-	BIOGRID
736606	2539171	2540009	275742	276553	SPCC830.08c	SPBC16G5.05c	yop1	scs2	-	SPBC16G5.05c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Zhang D (2012)	23041194	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology:partial rescue	genetic complex|the severe division-site positioning defects in the tts1/rtn1/yop1 deletion genetic background were largely alleviated by the loss of ER-PM tethering by deletion of scs2/scs22	-	BIOGRID
736607	2539923	2542179	276467	278654	SPBC1539.04	SPAC17C9.12	tts1	scs22	-	SPAC17C9.12	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Zhang D (2012)	23041194	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology:partial rescue	genetic complex|the severe division-site positioning defects in the tts1/rtn1/yop1 deletion genetic background were largely alleviated by the loss of ER-PM tethering by deletion of scs2/scs22	-	BIOGRID
736608	3361269	2542179	280345	278654	SPBC31A8.01c	SPAC17C9.12	rtn1	scs22	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	SPAC17C9.12	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Zhang D (2012)	23041194	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology:partial rescue	genetic complex|the severe division-site positioning defects in the tts1/rtn1/yop1 deletion genetic background were largely alleviated by the loss of ER-PM tethering by deletion of scs2/scs22	-	BIOGRID
736609	2539171	2542179	275742	278654	SPCC830.08c	SPAC17C9.12	yop1	scs22	-	SPAC17C9.12	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Zhang D (2012)	23041194	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology:partial rescue	genetic complex|the severe division-site positioning defects in the tts1/rtn1/yop1 deletion genetic background were largely alleviated by the loss of ER-PM tethering by deletion of scs2/scs22	-	BIOGRID
736639	2541599	2543360	278096	279782	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC664.10	sid2	klp2	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Mana-Capelli S (2012)	23087209	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736648	2543360	3361400	279782	280476	SPAC664.10	SPAC1093.06c	klp2	dhc1	-	SPAC30C2.01c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Mana-Capelli S (2012)	23087209	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation	double mutants show an increase in supernumerary spores per ascus	-	BIOGRID
736651	2540737	2543360	277260	279782	SPBC19G7.05c	SPAC664.10	bgs1	klp2	cps1|drc1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Mana-Capelli S (2012)	23087209	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nuclear morphology|nuclear position	genetic complex|triple mutants show an increase in cut nuclei	-	BIOGRID
736652	2540737	2543576	277260	279991	SPBC19G7.05c	SPAC4A8.05c	bgs1	myp2	cps1|drc1	myo3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Mana-Capelli S (2012)	23087209	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nuclear morphology|nuclear position	genetic complex|triple mutants show an increase in cut nuclei	-	BIOGRID
736654	2542123	2543360	278599	279782	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC664.10	mal3	klp2	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Mana-Capelli S (2012)	23087209	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736655	2539206	2540975	275776	277491	SPCC24B10.07	SPBC354.12	gad8	gpd3	-	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Du W (2012)	23213482	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736656	2539206	2539333	275776	275899	SPCC24B10.07	SPCC1902.02	gad8	mug72	-	SPCC663.16c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Du W (2012)	23213482	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736657	2539206	2541084	275776	277599	SPCC24B10.07	SPBC649.02	gad8	rps1902	-	rps19|rps19-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Du W (2012)	23213482	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736658	2539206	2539013	275776	275586	SPCC24B10.07	SPCC364.03	gad8	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Du W (2012)	23213482	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736659	2539206	2541894	275776	278384	SPCC24B10.07	SPAC11G7.03	gad8	idh1	-	glu3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Du W (2012)	23213482	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736660	2539206	2543581	275776	279996	SPCC24B10.07	SPAPB1E7.12	gad8	rps602	-	rps6|rps6-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Du W (2012)	23213482	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736661	2539206	2543686	275776	280100	SPCC24B10.07	SPAC3C7.14c	gad8	obr1	-	apt1|uhp1|p25	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Du W (2012)	23213482	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736662	2539206	2541963	275776	278449	SPCC24B10.07	SPAC21E11.04	gad8	aca1	-	ppr1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Du W (2012)	23213482	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736670	2540281	2539658	276812	276213	SPBC2G2.14	SPBC1105.17	csi1	cnp1	SPBC2G2.14	sim2	Co-localization	physical	Hou H (2012)	23166349	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	ChIP|csi1 dissociates from centromeres in the mutant	-	BIOGRID
736671	2540281	2542304	276812	278771	SPBC2G2.14	SPAC1687.20c	csi1	mis6	SPBC2G2.14	-	Co-localization	physical	Hou H (2012)	23166349	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	ChIP|csi1 dissociates from centromeres in the mutant	-	BIOGRID
736672	2540281	2540494	276812	277022	SPBC2G2.14	SPBC409.04c	csi1	mis12	SPBC2G2.14	-	Co-localization	physical	Hou H (2012)	23166349	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	ChIP|csi1 dissociates from centromeres in the mutant	-	BIOGRID
736673	2540281	2542004	276812	278487	SPBC2G2.14	SPAC27F1.04c	csi1	nuf2	SPBC2G2.14	-	Co-localization	physical	Hou H (2012)	23166349	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	ChIP|csi1 dissociates from centromeres in the mutant	-	BIOGRID
736674	2540281	2539914	276812	276458	SPBC2G2.14	SPBC12D12.01	csi1	sad1	SPBC2G2.14	SPBC16H5.01c	Co-localization	physical	Hou H (2012)	23166349	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	csi1 dissociates from centromeres in the mutant	-	BIOGRID
736675	2540281	2539914	276812	276458	SPBC2G2.14	SPBC12D12.01	csi1	sad1	SPBC2G2.14	SPBC16H5.01c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hou H (2012)	23166349	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736676	2540281	2539155	276812	275727	SPBC2G2.14	SPCC1020.02	csi1	spc7	SPBC2G2.14	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hou H (2012)	23166349	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736677	2540281	2539914	276812	276458	SPBC2G2.14	SPBC12D12.01	csi1	sad1	SPBC2G2.14	SPBC16H5.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Hou H (2012)	23166349	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736753	2543037	2540220	279472	276753	SPAC4G9.04c	SPBC337.03	pcf11	rhn1	SPAC4G9.04c	SPBC337.03|iss4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sugiyama T (2012)	22912768	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736758	2540220	2541672	276753	278168	SPBC337.03	SPAC2F3.15	rhn1	lsk1	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sugiyama T (2012)	22912768	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
736760	2541030	2542140	277545	278616	SPBC337.08c	SPAC1783.07c	ubi4	pap1	-	caf3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Penney M (2012)	23209828	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	likely ubiquitin conjugate	-	BIOGRID
736762	2540939	2542140	277455	278616	SPBC4.07c	SPAC1783.07c	rpt2	pap1	mts2	caf3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Penney M (2012)	23209828	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	deletion of pap1 abolishes the multi-drug resistance seen in the single mutant	-	BIOGRID
736763	2540025	2542140	276569	278616	SPBC16G5.01	SPAC1783.07c	rpn12	pap1	SPBC342.07|mts3	caf3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Penney M (2012)	23209828	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	deletion of pap1 abolishes the multi-drug resistance seen in the single mutant	-	BIOGRID
736764	2543040	2542140	279475	278616	SPAC31G5.13	SPAC1783.07c	rpn11	pap1	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	caf3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Penney M (2012)	23209828	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	deletion of pap1 abolishes the multi-drug resistance seen in the single mutant	-	BIOGRID
736841	2539494	2543581	276057	279996	SPCC4G3.08	SPAPB1E7.12	psk1	rps602	-	rps6|rps6-2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Nakashima A (2012)	22976295	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736842	2540720	2539494	277243	276057	SPBC216.07c	SPCC4G3.08	tor2	psk1	SPBC646.01c	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Nakashima A (2012)	22976295	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736843	2540720	2542492	277243	278951	SPBC216.07c	SPAC1B9.02c	tor2	sck1	SPBC646.01c	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Nakashima A (2012)	22976295	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736844	2540720	2541867	277243	278357	SPBC216.07c	SPAC22E12.14c	tor2	sck2	SPBC646.01c	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Nakashima A (2012)	22976295	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736845	2539517	2539494	276079	276057	SPCC576.15c	SPCC4G3.08	ksg1	psk1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Nakashima A (2012)	22976295	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736847	2539568	2540895	276128	277411	SPCC663.05c	SPBC577.15c	cia1	sim3	asf1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tanae K (2012)	23089178	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue|heat sensitivity:partial rescue	Overexpression of sim3 suppressed the defect in chromatin structure and prevented the accumulation of DNA damage in the asf1-33 mutant	-	BIOGRID
736848	2539568	2540895	276128	277411	SPCC663.05c	SPBC577.15c	cia1	sim3	asf1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Tanae K (2012)	23089178	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue|heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Overexpression of sim3 suppressed the defect in chromatin structure and prevented the accumulation of DNA damage in the asf1-30 mutant	-	BIOGRID
736849	2539568	2540895	276128	277411	SPCC663.05c	SPBC577.15c	cia1	sim3	asf1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tanae K (2012)	23089178	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	asf1-33/sim3 double mutants are synthetic lethal	-	BIOGRID
736850	2540719	2539920	277242	276464	SPBC216.05	SPBC119.08	rad3	pmk1	-	spm1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Broadus MR (2012)	22918952	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution	double mutants show increased delay of Clp1 nucleoplasmic relocation in response to genotoxic stress|genetic complex|rad3/cdk1/pmk1 triple mutants show a complete loss of Clp1-GFP accumulation in the nucleoplasm under replicative stress	-	BIOGRID
736851	2540719	2539869	277242	276415	SPBC216.05	SPBC11B10.09	rad3	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Broadus MR (2012)	22918952	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution	double mutants show increased delay of Clp1 nucleoplasmic relocation in response to genotoxic stress|genetic complex|rad3/cdk1/pmk1 triple mutants show a complete loss of Clp1-GFP accumulation in the nucleoplasm under replicative stress	-	BIOGRID
736852	2539920	2539869	276464	276415	SPBC119.08	SPBC11B10.09	pmk1	cdc2	spm1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Broadus MR (2012)	22918952	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution	double mutants show complete loss of Clp1 nucleoplasmic relocation in response to genotoxic stress	-	BIOGRID
736853	2539869	2539920	276415	276464	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC119.08	cdc2	pmk1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	spm1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Broadus MR (2012)	22918952	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution	genetic complex|rad3/cdk1/pmk1 triple mutants show a complete loss of Clp1-GFP accumulation in the nucleoplasm under replicative stress	-	BIOGRID
736854	2539920	2542358	276464	278823	SPBC119.08	SPAC1782.09c	pmk1	clp1	spm1	flp1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Broadus MR (2012)	22918952	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736855	2539869	2542358	276415	278823	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC1782.09c	cdc2	clp1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	flp1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Broadus MR (2012)	22918952	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736856	2542029	2542358	278511	278823	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC1782.09c	rad24	clp1	anr5|sam4	flp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Broadus MR (2012)	22918952	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736857	2539716	2540051	276269	276589	SPBC1289.01c	SPBC32H8.12c	chr4	act1	SPBC1539.11c|cfh3	cps8|pi012	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sharifmoghadam MR (2012)	22905165	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
736858	2539716	2541975	276269	278460	SPBC1289.01c	SPAC20G8.05c	chr4	cdc15	SPBC1539.11c|cfh3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sharifmoghadam MR (2012)	22905165	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
736859	2539716	2540112	276269	276649	SPBC1289.01c	SPBC11C11.02	chr4	imp2	SPBC1539.11c|cfh3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sharifmoghadam MR (2012)	22905165	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
736860	2541975	2539716	278460	276269	SPAC20G8.05c	SPBC1289.01c	cdc15	chr4	-	SPBC1539.11c|cfh3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sharifmoghadam MR (2012)	22905165	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736863	2539381	2538846	275947	275427	SPCC1739.10	SPCC1919.10c	mug33	myo52	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
736864	2539381	2539487	275947	276050	SPCC1739.10	SPCC895.05	mug33	for3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
736871	2539381	2539487	275947	276050	SPCC1739.10	SPCC895.05	mug33	for3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein secretion	exocytosis of acid phosphatase is greatly reduced in double mutant but normal in single mutants	-	BIOGRID
736872	2540127	2539487	276664	276050	SPBC106.20	SPCC895.05	exo70	for3	SPBC582.02	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein secretion	exocytosis of acid phosphatase is greatly reduced in double mutant but normal in single mutants	-	BIOGRID
736873	2539381	3361511	275947	280587	SPCC1739.10	SPAC23C4.08	mug33	rho3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
736874	2539407	3361511	275972	280587	SPCC970.09	SPAC23C4.08	sec8	rho3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
736875	2539407	2540127	275972	276664	SPCC970.09	SPBC106.20	sec8	exo70	-	SPBC582.02	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
736876	2539407	2539487	275972	276050	SPCC970.09	SPCC895.05	sec8	for3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
736877	2539407	2538846	275972	275427	SPCC970.09	SPCC1919.10c	sec8	myo52	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
736878	2539487	3361511	276050	280587	SPCC895.05	SPAC23C4.08	for3	rho3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
736879	2538846	3361511	275427	280587	SPCC1919.10c	SPAC23C4.08	myo52	rho3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
736880	2539487	2540127	276050	276664	SPCC895.05	SPBC106.20	for3	exo70	-	SPBC582.02	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
736881	2538846	2540127	275427	276664	SPCC1919.10c	SPBC106.20	myo52	exo70	-	SPBC582.02	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
736882	2538846	2539487	275427	276050	SPCC1919.10c	SPCC895.05	myo52	for3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Snaith HA (2011)	21652630	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
736929	2543164	2542757	279595	279207	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC13C5.07	rad2	mre11	fen1	rad32	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Limbo O (2012)	23080121	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
736930	2542757	2540348	279207	276877	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC29A10.05	mre11	exo1	rad32	mut2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Limbo O (2012)	23080121	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
736931	2542757	2541045	279207	277560	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC543.03c	mre11	pku80	rad32	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Limbo O (2012)	23080121	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of ku80 partially suppresses the sensitivity to DNA damage in some mre11 mutants	-	BIOGRID
736932	3361306	2542757	280382	279207	SPBC6B1.09c	SPAC13C5.07	nbs1	mre11	slr10	rad32	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Limbo O (2012)	23080121	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S4d	-	BIOGRID
736933	2542757	3361306	279207	280382	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC6B1.09c	mre11	nbs1	rad32	slr10	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Limbo O (2012)	23080121	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S4d	-	BIOGRID
736934	2541635	2542757	278131	279207	SPAC1556.01c	SPAC13C5.07	rad50	mre11	SPAP4C9.01c	rad32	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Limbo O (2012)	23080121	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736938	2540719	2539209	277242	275779	SPBC216.05	SPCC23B6.03c	rad3	tel1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Limbo O (2012)	23080121	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	double mutants show a loss of telomeres	-	BIOGRID
736939	2540719	2542757	277242	279207	SPBC216.05	SPAC13C5.07	rad3	mre11	-	rad32	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Limbo O (2012)	23080121	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	double mutants show a loss of telomeres	-	BIOGRID
736948	2543086	2543580	279519	279995	SPAC30D11.10	SPAC644.14c	rad52	rad51	rad22|rad22A	rhp51	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Iraqui I (2012)	23093942	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	double mutants show a decrease in replication slippage	-	BIOGRID
736951	2540799	2543497	277318	279916	SPBC18H10.15	SPAC926.09c	cdk11	fas1	ppk23	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Drogat J (2012)	23122962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736952	2540799	2541916	277318	278406	SPBC18H10.15	SPAC23C4.19	cdk11	spt5	ppk23	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Drogat J (2012)	23122962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736953	2540799	2539225	277318	275795	SPBC18H10.15	SPCC1739.13	cdk11	ssa2	ppk23	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Drogat J (2012)	23122962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736954	2540799	2539691	277318	276245	SPBC18H10.15	SPBC12D12.03	cdk11	cct1	ppk23	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Drogat J (2012)	23122962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736955	2540799	2538689	277318	275274	SPBC18H10.15	SPCC1795.11	cdk11	sum3	ppk23	ded1|moc2|slh3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Drogat J (2012)	23122962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736956	2540799	2541383	277318	277894	SPBC18H10.15	SPBP8B7.16c	cdk11	dbp2	ppk23	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Drogat J (2012)	23122962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736957	2540799	2542242	277318	278713	SPBC18H10.15	SPAC18G6.04c	cdk11	shm2	ppk23	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Drogat J (2012)	23122962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736958	2540799	2540547	277318	277074	SPBC18H10.15	SPBC32F12.11	cdk11	tdh1	ppk23	gpd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Drogat J (2012)	23122962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736959	2540799	2540272	277318	276803	SPBC18H10.15	SPBC31F10.09c	cdk11	nut2	ppk23	med10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Drogat J (2012)	23122962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736960	2540799	2540700	277318	277224	SPBC18H10.15	SPBC21C3.16c	cdk11	spt4	ppk23	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Drogat J (2012)	23122962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736961	2540799	2542980	277318	279418	SPBC18H10.15	SPAC1296.05c	cdk11	lcp1	ppk23	SPAC1296.05c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Drogat J (2012)	23122962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736963	2540799	2540799	277318	277318	SPBC18H10.15	SPBC18H10.15	cdk11	cdk11	ppk23	ppk23	Biochemical Activity	physical	Drogat J (2012)	23122962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736964	2540799	2539994	277318	276538	SPBC18H10.15	SPBC1105.06	cdk11	pmc4	ppk23	med4	Biochemical Activity	physical	Drogat J (2012)	23122962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736965	2540799	2542141	277318	278617	SPBC18H10.15	SPAC17C9.05c	cdk11	pmc3	ppk23	med27|prk1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Drogat J (2012)	23122962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736966	2540272	2540799	276803	277318	SPBC31F10.09c	SPBC18H10.15	nut2	cdk11	med10	ppk23	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Drogat J (2012)	23122962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736967	2540799	2541900	277318	278390	SPBC18H10.15	SPAC23H4.17c	cdk11	srb10	ppk23	cdk8|prk1	Co-localization	physical	Drogat J (2012)	23122962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	ChIP	-	BIOGRID
736968	2540799	2542571	277318	279027	SPBC18H10.15	SPAC589.02c	cdk11	med13	ppk23	spTrap240|srb9	Co-localization	physical	Drogat J (2012)	23122962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	ChIP	-	BIOGRID
736969	2539773	2542141	276324	278617	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC17C9.05c	med7	pmc3	-	med27|prk1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Drogat J (2012)	23122962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736970	2541900	2542141	278390	278617	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC17C9.05c	srb10	pmc3	cdk8|prk1	med27|prk1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Drogat J (2012)	23122962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736971	2539773	2541900	276324	278390	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC23H4.17c	med7	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Drogat J (2012)	23122962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
736972	2539087	2539627	275659	276184	SPCC1259.13	SPBC1734.02c	chk1	cdc27	rad27	SPBC337.18c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kuntz K (2012)	23211746	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
736974	2539087	2542083	275659	278560	SPCC1259.13	SPAC27E2.05	chk1	cdc1	rad27	mis1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kuntz K (2012)	23211746	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	cdc1 rescues the synthetic lethality of a chk1/cdc27 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
736975	2539627	2542083	276184	278560	SPBC1734.02c	SPAC27E2.05	cdc27	cdc1	SPBC337.18c	mis1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kuntz K (2012)	23211746	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	cdc1 rescues the synthetic lethality of a chk1/cdc27 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
736976	2539087	2539485	275659	276048	SPCC1259.13	SPCC962.05	chk1	ast1	rad27	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kuntz K (2012)	23211746	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	ast1 rescues the synthetic lethality of a chk1/cdc27 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
736977	2539627	2539485	276184	276048	SPBC1734.02c	SPCC962.05	cdc27	ast1	SPBC337.18c	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kuntz K (2012)	23211746	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	ast1 rescues the synthetic lethality of a chk1/cdc27 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
736978	2539087	2543164	275659	279595	SPCC1259.13	SPAC3G6.06c	chk1	rad2	rad27	fen1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kuntz K (2012)	23211746	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	genetic complex|rad2 weakly suppresses the synthetic lethality of a chk1/cdc27 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
736979	2539627	2543164	276184	279595	SPBC1734.02c	SPAC3G6.06c	cdc27	rad2	SPBC337.18c	fen1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kuntz K (2012)	23211746	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	genetic complex|rad2 weakly suppresses the synthetic lethality of a chk1/cdc27 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
736980	2540348	2543164	276877	279595	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC3G6.06c	exo1	rad2	mut2	fen1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kuntz K (2012)	23211746	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
737019	2540348	2539485	276877	276048	SPBC29A10.05	SPCC962.05	exo1	ast1	mut2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kuntz K (2012)	23211746	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	deletion of ast1 increases the rate of aberrant mitosis in an exo1/rad2 mutant background and decreases cell cycle checkpoint delays|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
737020	2543164	2539485	279595	276048	SPAC3G6.06c	SPCC962.05	rad2	ast1	fen1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kuntz K (2012)	23211746	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	deletion of ast1 increases the rate of aberrant mitosis in an exo1/rad2 mutant background and decreases cell cycle checkpoint delays|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
737021	2540348	2539485	276877	276048	SPBC29A10.05	SPCC962.05	exo1	ast1	mut2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kuntz K (2012)	23211746	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue|mitotic cell cycle:partial rescue	deletion of ast1 attenuates the loss of ssDNA production|deletion of ast1 increases the rate of aberrant mitosis in an exo1/rad2 mutant background and decreases cell cycle checkpoint delays|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
737022	2543164	2539485	279595	276048	SPAC3G6.06c	SPCC962.05	rad2	ast1	fen1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kuntz K (2012)	23211746	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue|mitotic cell cycle:partial rescue	deletion of ast1 attenuates the loss of ssDNA production|deletion of ast1 increases the rate of aberrant mitosis in an exo1/rad2 mutant background and decreases cell cycle checkpoint delays|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
737023	2539485	2542757	276048	279207	SPCC962.05	SPAC13C5.07	ast1	mre11	-	rad32	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kuntz K (2012)	23211746	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
737024	2540348	2542757	276877	279207	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC13C5.07	exo1	mre11	mut2	rad32	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kuntz K (2012)	23211746	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
737025	2543580	2540348	279995	276877	SPAC644.14c	SPBC29A10.05	rad51	exo1	rhp51	mut2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kuntz K (2012)	23211746	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic recombination:partial rescue	double mutants show decreased recombination compared to a rad51 mutant	-	BIOGRID
737026	2543580	2539485	279995	276048	SPAC644.14c	SPCC962.05	rad51	ast1	rhp51	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kuntz K (2012)	23211746	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic recombination:partial rescue	double mutants show decreased recombination compared to a rad51 mutant	-	BIOGRID
737027	2540348	2539087	276877	275659	SPBC29A10.05	SPCC1259.13	exo1	chk1	mut2	rad27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kuntz K (2012)	23211746	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	deletion of chk1 increases the rate of aberrant mitosis in an exo1/rad2 mutant background and decreases cell cycle checkpoint delays|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
737028	2543164	2539087	279595	275659	SPAC3G6.06c	SPCC1259.13	rad2	chk1	fen1	rad27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kuntz K (2012)	23211746	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	deletion of chk1 increases the rate of aberrant mitosis in an exo1/rad2 mutant background and decreases cell cycle checkpoint delays|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
737029	2540348	2539087	276877	275659	SPBC29A10.05	SPCC1259.13	exo1	chk1	mut2	rad27	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kuntz K (2012)	23211746	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:partial rescue	deletion of chk1 increases the rate of aberrant mitosis in an exo1/rad2 mutant background and decreases cell cycle checkpoint delays|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
737030	2543164	2539087	279595	275659	SPAC3G6.06c	SPCC1259.13	rad2	chk1	fen1	rad27	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kuntz K (2012)	23211746	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:partial rescue	deletion of chk1 increases the rate of aberrant mitosis in an exo1/rad2 mutant background and decreases cell cycle checkpoint delays|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
737050	2540401	2539971	276929	276515	SPBC2A9.02	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC2A9.02	cbp1	-	abp1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Pan X (2012)	23173672	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression partially rescues growth in response to DNA damage	-	BIOGRID
737051	2540401	2539827	276929	276376	SPBC2A9.02	SPBC1861.02	SPBC2A9.02	abp2	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Pan X (2012)	23173672	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression partially rescues growth in response to DNA damage	-	BIOGRID
737052	2542223	2539971	278696	276515	SPAC27D7.08c	SPBC1105.04c	SPAC27D7.08c	cbp1	-	abp1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Pan X (2012)	23173672	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression partially rescues growth in response to DNA damage	-	BIOGRID
737053	2542223	2539827	278696	276376	SPAC27D7.08c	SPBC1861.02	SPAC27D7.08c	abp2	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Pan X (2012)	23173672	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression partially rescues growth in response to DNA damage	-	BIOGRID
737158	2543685	2543086	280099	279519	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC30D11.10	rad55	rad52	rhp55	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Khasanov FK (1999)	10430583	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	gamma ray resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show a synergistic sensitivity to gamma radiation and other DNA damaging agents	-	BIOGRID
737159	2543580	2543086	279995	279519	SPAC644.14c	SPAC30D11.10	rad51	rad52	rhp51	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Khasanov FK (1999)	10430583	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	gamma ray resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show a synergistic sensitivity to gamma radiation and other DNA damaging agents	-	BIOGRID
737160	2542749	2543086	279199	279519	SPAC15A10.03c	SPAC30D11.10	rad54	rad52	rhp54	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Khasanov FK (1999)	10430583	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	gamma ray resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show a synergistic sensitivity to gamma radiation and other DNA damaging agents	-	BIOGRID
737161	2539209	2540719	275779	277242	SPCC23B6.03c	SPBC216.05	tel1	rad3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Matsuura A (1999)	10430579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	double mutants show enhanced telomere shortening	-	BIOGRID
737162	2539505	2540398	276068	276926	SPCC736.14	SPBC26H8.10	dis1	dis3	-	rrp44	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kinoshita N (1991)	1944266	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
737163	2539505	2541193	276068	277707	SPCC736.14	SPBC776.02c	dis1	dis2	-	bws1|sds1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kinoshita N (1991)	1944266	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
737164	2539123	2541193	275695	277707	SPCC18B5.03	SPBC776.02c	wee1	dis2	-	bws1|sds1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kinoshita N (1991)	1944266	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined	genetic complex|overexpression of dis2 rescues the temperature sensitive phenotype of a cdc25/wee1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
737165	2542632	2541193	279086	277707	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC776.02c	cdc25	dis2	sal2	bws1|sds1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kinoshita N (1991)	1944266	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined	genetic complex|overexpression of dis2 rescues the temperature sensitive phenotype of a cdc25/wee1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
737166	2539123	2539179	275695	275750	SPCC18B5.03	SPCC31H12.05c	wee1	sds21	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kinoshita N (1991)	1944266	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined	genetic complex|overexpression of sds21 rescues the temperature sensitive phenotype of a cdc25/wee1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
737167	2542632	2539179	279086	275750	SPAC24H6.05	SPCC31H12.05c	cdc25	sds21	sal2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kinoshita N (1991)	1944266	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined	genetic complex|overexpression of sds21 rescues the temperature sensitive phenotype of a cdc25/wee1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
737190	2539992	3361511	276536	280587	SPBC1289.04c	SPAC23C4.08	pob1	rho3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Nakano K (2011)	21401840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
737191	2539992	2543027	276536	279463	SPBC1289.04c	SPAC110.03	pob1	cdc42	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Nakano K (2011)	21401840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
737192	2539992	2543027	276536	279463	SPBC1289.04c	SPAC110.03	pob1	cdc42	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nakano K (2011)	21401840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
737193	2539992	2539407	276536	275972	SPBC1289.04c	SPCC970.09	pob1	sec8	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakano K (2011)	21401840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
737194	2539992	2540127	276536	276664	SPBC1289.04c	SPBC106.20	pob1	exo70	-	SPBC582.02	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakano K (2011)	21401840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
737195	2539407	2539487	275972	276050	SPCC970.09	SPCC895.05	sec8	for3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakano K (2011)	21401840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
737196	2540624	2540499	277150	277027	SPBC24C6.07	SPBC25D12.02c	cdc14	dnt1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2007)	17538026	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of dnt1 partially rescues the temperature sensitivity of a cdc14/myo2 double mutant|dnt1 deletion raises the restrictive temperature of a clp1/cdc14 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
737197	2539513	2540499	276075	277027	SPCC645.05c	SPBC25D12.02c	myo2	dnt1	rng5	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2007)	17538026	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of dnt1 partially rescues the temperature sensitivity of a cdc14/myo2 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
737198	2540624	2542734	277150	279184	SPBC24C6.07	SPAC29A4.10	cdc14	rrn5	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2007)	17538026	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of rrn5 partially rescues the temperature sensitivity of a cdc14/myo2 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
737199	2539513	2542734	276075	279184	SPCC645.05c	SPAC29A4.10	myo2	rrn5	rng5	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2007)	17538026	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of rrn5 partially rescues the temperature sensitivity of a cdc14/myo2 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
737200	2540624	2540873	277150	277390	SPBC24C6.07	SPBC4C3.05c	cdc14	nuc1	-	rpa1|rpa190	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2007)	17538026	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of nuc1 mildly suppresses the temperature sensitivity of a cdc14/myo2 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
737201	2539513	2540873	276075	277390	SPCC645.05c	SPBC4C3.05c	myo2	nuc1	rng5	rpa1|rpa190	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2007)	17538026	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of nuc1 mildly suppresses the temperature sensitivity of a cdc14/myo2 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
737202	2540624	2539513	277150	276075	SPBC24C6.07	SPCC645.05c	cdc14	myo2	-	rng5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Jin QW (2007)	17538026	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
737204	2542358	2540624	278823	277150	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC24C6.07	clp1	cdc14	flp1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Jin QW (2007)	17538026	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
737205	2542358	2540499	278823	277027	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC25D12.02c	clp1	dnt1	flp1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jin QW (2007)	17538026	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	dnt1 deletion raises the restrictive temperature of a clp1/cdc14 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
737206	3361533	2543281	280609	279708	SPAC222.15	SPAC23C4.18c	meu13	rad4	SPAC821.01	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Perera D (2004)	14718568	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation efficiency	double mutants show decreased spore viability	-	BIOGRID
737207	2541055	2542052	277570	278531	SPBC409.07c	SPAC823.15	wis1	ppa1	smf2|spc2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Warbrick E (1991)	1756736	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:partial rescue	mutants suppress the cell length defects caused by wis1 mutation	-	BIOGRID
737208	2540060	2540582	276598	277108	SPBC106.01	SPBC26H8.07c	mph1	nda3	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	alp12|ben1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	He X (1998)	9601094	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	double mutants show a loss of viabiltiy	-	BIOGRID
737209	2542655	2543360	279109	279782	SPAC3A11.14c	SPAC664.10	pkl1	klp2	SPAC3H5.03c|klp1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Grishchuk EL (2007)	17409356	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	double mutants show an increased rate of minichromosome loss	-	BIOGRID
737210	2542655	3361400	279109	280476	SPAC3A11.14c	SPAC1093.06c	pkl1	dhc1	SPAC3H5.03c|klp1	SPAC30C2.01c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Grishchuk EL (2007)	17409356	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	double mutants show an increased rate of minichromosome loss	-	BIOGRID
737405	2542628	2542266	279082	278735	SPAC24H6.06	SPAC17D4.02	sld3	cdc45	mug175	goa1|sna41	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nakajima R (2002)	12006645	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
737406	2542628	2540784	279082	277303	SPAC24H6.06	SPBC211.04c	sld3	mcm6	mug175	mis5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nakajima R (2002)	12006645	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
737407	2542628	2540630	279082	277156	SPAC24H6.06	SPBC25D12.03c	sld3	mcm7	mug175	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nakajima R (2002)	12006645	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
737413	2540784	2542266	277303	278735	SPBC211.04c	SPAC17D4.02	mcm6	cdc45	mis5	goa1|sna41	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nakajima R (2002)	12006645	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
737414	2540802	2543164	277321	279595	SPBC1921.02	SPAC3G6.06c	rad60	rad2	-	fen1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Morishita T (2002)	11971984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
737415	2540802	2539686	277321	276241	SPBC1921.02	SPBC1734.06	rad60	rhp18	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Morishita T (2002)	11971984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
737416	2539686	2540802	276241	277321	SPBC1734.06	SPBC1921.02	rhp18	rad60	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Morishita T (2002)	11971984	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overxpression of rad60 partially suppresses sensitivity to MMS (CID 4156 CHEBI 25255)	-	BIOGRID
737417	2540361	2540589	276890	277115	SPBC2F12.13	SPBC20F10.06	klp5	mad2	sot1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Garcia MA (2002)	11967147	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein activity:wild type|spindle morphology:wild type	deletion of mad2 completely abolishes the defects in spindle behavior and degradation of Cut2 kinetics seen upon deletion of klp5	-	BIOGRID
737420	2542313	2543086	278779	279519	SPAC16A10.07c	SPAC30D11.10	taz1	rad52	myb|myb1	rad22|rad22A	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ferreira MG (2001)	11172711	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance|viability	double mutants show an increase in telomere fusions and decreased viability	-	BIOGRID
737428	2543481	2539640	279901	276195	SPAPB2B4.03	SPBC32F12.09	cig2	rum1	cyc17	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yamano H (2000)	11163211	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	Ectopic expression of Cig2deltaDB is toxic, but coexpression of the CDK inhibitor Rum1 rescues the toxicity	-	BIOGRID
737432	2540917	2543481	277433	279901	SPBC409.05	SPAPB2B4.03	skp1	cig2	psh1|sph1	cyc17	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yamano H (2000)	11163211	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	cig2deltaDB lowers the restrictive temperature of skp1-a4	-	BIOGRID
737434	2539869	2539087	276415	275659	SPBC11B10.09	SPCC1259.13	cdc2	chk1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	rad27	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Baber-Furnari BA (2000)	10637286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:wild type|radiation resistance:wild type	deletion of chk1 relieves the mitotic delay seen in a cdc25/cdc2 double mutant upon exposure to radiation|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
737541	2542632	2540885	279086	277402	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC660.14	cdc25	mik1	sal2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Baber-Furnari BA (2000)	10637286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:wild type|radiation resistance:wild type	deletion of mik1 relieves the mitotic delay seen in a cdc25/cdc2 double mutant upon exposure to radiation|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
737542	2539869	2540885	276415	277402	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC660.14	cdc2	mik1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Baber-Furnari BA (2000)	10637286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:wild type|radiation resistance:wild type	deletion of mik1 relieves the mitotic delay seen in a cdc25/cdc2 double mutant upon exposure to radiation|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
737543	2542632	2540719	279086	277242	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC216.05	cdc25	rad3	sal2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Baber-Furnari BA (2000)	10637286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:undetermined	deletion of rad3 or chk1 inhibits the accumulation of mik1 in cdc25 mutant cells in response to bleomycin	-	BIOGRID
737544	2541030	2540885	277545	277402	SPBC337.08c	SPBC660.14	ubi4	mik1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Baber-Furnari BA (2000)	10637286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	likely ubiquitin conjugate	-	BIOGRID
737545	2542632	2539087	279086	275659	SPAC24H6.05	SPCC1259.13	cdc25	chk1	sal2	rad27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Baber-Furnari BA (2000)	10637286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	GST-Chk1 overexpression caused cell cycle arrest in wee1/cdc25 mutant cells|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
737546	2539123	2539087	275695	275659	SPCC18B5.03	SPCC1259.13	wee1	chk1	-	rad27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Baber-Furnari BA (2000)	10637286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	GST-Chk1 overexpression caused cell cycle arrest in wee1/cdc25 mutant cells|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
737547	2543576	2539513	279991	276075	SPAC4A8.05c	SPCC645.05c	myp2	myo2	myo3	rng5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bezanilla M (2000)	10637292	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity|heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to heat and cold sensitivity in 1 M KCl	-	BIOGRID
737548	2541612	2539649	278109	276204	SPAC1F7.04	SPBC12D12.04c	rho1	pck2	-	pkc1|sts6	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Sayers LG (2000)	10651902	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	Overexpression of the HR1 domain of pck2 rescues growth of a Rho1 overexpressing mutant	-	BIOGRID
737549	2539649	2541612	276204	278109	SPBC12D12.04c	SPAC1F7.04	pck2	rho1	pkc1|sts6	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Sayers LG (2000)	10651902	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
737550	2542293	2541612	278761	278109	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC1F7.04	pck1	rho1	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Sayers LG (2000)	10651902	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
737551	2542622	2542632	279076	279086	SPAC18B11.07c	SPAC24H6.05	rhp6	cdc25	sng1|ubc2	sal2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Rowley R (1999)	10224243	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
737552	2542622	2540880	279076	277397	SPAC18B11.07c	SPBC582.03	rhp6	cdc13	sng1|ubc2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Rowley R (1999)	10224243	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
737553	2540051	2543526	276589	279944	SPBC32H8.12c	SPAC4A8.15c	act1	cdc3	cps8|pi012	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	McCollum D (1999)	10371213	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
737555	2540024	2540019	276568	276563	SPBP4H10.04	SPBC1685.01	ppb1	pmp1	SPBC1346.01c	dsp1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Sugiura R (1998)	9427748	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	pmp1 rescues the Cl sensitivity of a ppb1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
737556	2540019	2540024	276563	276568	SPBC1685.01	SPBP4H10.04	pmp1	ppb1	dsp1	SPBC1346.01c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Sugiura R (1998)	9427748	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	Overproduction of the C-terminal truncated Ppb1, but not full-length ppb1 rescues growth of a pmp1 mutant on FK506 or MgCl2	-	BIOGRID
737557	2540019	2540024	276563	276568	SPBC1685.01	SPBP4H10.04	pmp1	ppb1	dsp1	SPBC1346.01c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sugiura R (1998)	9427748	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
737558	2540024	2539920	276568	276464	SPBP4H10.04	SPBC119.08	ppb1	pmk1	SPBC1346.01c	spm1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sugiura R (1998)	9427748	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	disruption of pmk1, mkh1 or pck2 rescues the Cl sensitivity of a ppb1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
737559	2540024	2542175	276568	278650	SPBP4H10.04	SPAC1F3.02c	ppb1	mkh1	SPBC1346.01c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sugiura R (1998)	9427748	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	disruption of pmk1, mkh1 or pck2 rescues the Cl sensitivity of a ppb1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
737560	2540024	2539649	276568	276204	SPBP4H10.04	SPBC12D12.04c	ppb1	pck2	SPBC1346.01c	pkc1|sts6	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sugiura R (1998)	9427748	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	disruption of pmk1, mkh1 or pck2 rescues the Cl sensitivity of a ppb1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
737561	2542337	2540760	278803	277280	SPAC16E8.09	SPBC21.05c	scd1	ral2	ral1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Fukui Y (1988)	3071741	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue	Multiple copies of either the ral2 or the ral3 gene could partially restore mating ability in ral1- strains	-	BIOGRID
737562	2542337	2541726	278803	278220	SPAC16E8.09	SPAC22H10.07	scd1	scd2	ral1	ral3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Fukui Y (1988)	3071741	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue	Multiple copies of either the ral2 or the ral3 gene could partially restore mating ability in ral1- strains	-	BIOGRID
737563	2542337	2542285	278803	278753	SPAC16E8.09	SPAC17H9.09c	scd1	ras1	ral1	ste5	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Fukui Y (1988)	3071741	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue	Multiple copies of the ras1 gene could partially restore mating ability in ral1- and ral2- strains	-	BIOGRID
737564	2540760	2542285	277280	278753	SPBC21.05c	SPAC17H9.09c	ral2	ras1	-	ste5	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Fukui Y (1988)	3071741	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue	Multiple copies of the ras1 gene could partially restore mating ability in ral1- and ral2- strains	-	BIOGRID
737565	2538959	2539004	275533	275578	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC4G3.05c	cds1	mus81	-	slx3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Boddy MN (2000)	11073977	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
737566	2540255	2539004	276786	275578	SPBC336.04	SPCC4G3.05c	cdc6	mus81	mis10|pol3|pold	slx3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Boddy MN (2000)	11073977	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
737567	2543629	2539004	280043	275578	SPAC3H5.06c	SPCC4G3.05c	pol1	mus81	polA|swi7	slx3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Boddy MN (2000)	11073977	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
740582	2541055	2539027	277570	275600	SPBC409.07c	SPCC1322.08	wis1	srk1	smf2|spc2	mkp1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Smith DA (2002)	12080074	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	Deletion of the srk1 Gene Partially Suppresses the Lethality Associated with Overexpression of the MAPKK Wis1	-	BIOGRID
740602	2539087	2540992	275659	277508	SPCC1259.13	SPBC342.05	chk1	crb2	rad27	rhp9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Francesconi S (2002)	12081644	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:wild type	increased level of protein Crb2 restores the slow cut phenotype seen in a cds1/chk1 double mutant to cds1 single mutant levels	-	BIOGRID
740617	2539004	945174	275578	849560	SPCC4G3.05c	b0550	mus81	rusA	slx3	ECK0541|JW0538|rus|ybcP	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Doe CL (2002)	12084712	284812	511145	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	RusA rescues the synthetic lethality of a mus81 rqh1 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
740618	2541620	945174	278117	849560	SPAC2G11.12	b0550	rqh1	rusA	hus2|rad12|rec9	ECK0541|JW0538|rus|ybcP	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Doe CL (2002)	12084712	284812	511145	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	RusA rescues the synthetic lethality of a mus81 rqh1 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
740619	2543670	2539004	280084	275578	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPCC4G3.05c	eme1	mus81	mms4|slx2	slx3	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Doe CL (2002)	12084712	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
740620	2542175	2539920	278650	276464	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC119.08	mkh1	pmk1	-	spm1	Two-hybrid	physical	Loewith R (2000)	10591634	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	interaction only seen upon co-expression of pek1-HA	-	BIOGRID
740621	2540919	2539920	277435	276464	SPBC543.07	SPBC119.08	pek1	pmk1	mkk1|skh1	spm1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Loewith R (2000)	10591634	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression rescues growth in the presence of KCl and beta-glucanase	-	BIOGRID
740622	2542175	2540919	278650	277435	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC543.07	mkh1	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Loewith R (2000)	10591634	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression rescues growth in the presence of KCl and beta-glucanase	-	BIOGRID
740623	2540919	2539920	277435	276464	SPBC543.07	SPBC119.08	pek1	pmk1	mkk1|skh1	spm1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Loewith R (2000)	10591634	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
740628	2542380	2540853	278844	277370	SPAC17G6.04c	SPBC428.16c	cpp1	rhb1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yang W (2000)	10617635	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	cpp1 mutants are hypersensitive to canavanine (CID 439202 CHEBI 609827), a phenotype that is suppressed by the small GTPase SpRheb	-	BIOGRID
740674	2543387	2538736	279809	275320	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC1322.12c	mcl1	bub1	slr3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Williams DR (2002)	12455694	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
740675	2543387	2539447	279809	276010	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC338.17c	mcl1	rad21	slr3	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Williams DR (2002)	12455694	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
740676	2543387	2541165	279809	277680	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC776.12c	mcl1	hsk1	slr3	cdc7	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Williams DR (2002)	12455694	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
740677	2543387	2541620	279809	278117	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC2G11.12	mcl1	rqh1	slr3	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Williams DR (2002)	12455694	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
740678	2543387	2543407	279809	279829	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC8F11.07c	mcl1	cdc24	slr3	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Williams DR (2002)	12455694	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
740679	2543387	2542558	279809	279014	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC1952.07	mcl1	rad1	slr3	rad19	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Williams DR (2002)	12455694	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
740680	2543387	2543544	279809	279961	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC664.07c	mcl1	rad9	slr3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Williams DR (2002)	12455694	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
740681	2543387	2539686	279809	276241	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC1734.06	mcl1	rhp18	slr3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Williams DR (2002)	12455694	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
740682	2543387	2540885	279809	277402	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC660.14	mcl1	mik1	slr3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Williams DR (2002)	12455694	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
740683	2543387	2539123	279809	275695	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC18B5.03	mcl1	wee1	slr3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Williams DR (2002)	12455694	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
740684	2543387	2543629	279809	280043	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC3H5.06c	mcl1	pol1	slr3	polA|swi7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Williams DR (2002)	12455694	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
740685	2543387	2541695	279809	278191	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC1F7.05	mcl1	cdc22	slr3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Williams DR (2002)	12455694	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
740687	2543387	2540148	279809	276685	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC16D10.04c	mcl1	dna2	slr3	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Williams DR (2002)	12455694	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
740688	2539504	2540258	276067	276789	SPCP31B10.03c	SPBC32C12.02	med31	ste11	sep10|soh1	aff1|stex	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Szilagyi Z (2002)	12471453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:wild type	ste11 overexpression restored fertility in the sep10-412 mutant	-	BIOGRID
740689	2540737	2541699	277260	278195	SPBC19G7.05c	SPAP8A3.08	bgs1	cdc4	cps1|drc1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Le Goff X (1999)	10503548	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
740690	2540737	2541940	277260	278427	SPBC19G7.05c	SPAC27F1.02c	bgs1	cdc8	cps1|drc1	fus4	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Le Goff X (1999)	10503548	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
740691	2540737	2541975	277260	278460	SPBC19G7.05c	SPAC20G8.05c	bgs1	cdc15	cps1|drc1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Le Goff X (1999)	10503548	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
740692	2540737	2539047	277260	275620	SPBC19G7.05c	SPCC1223.06	bgs1	tea1	cps1|drc1	alp8	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Le Goff X (1999)	10503548	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
740693	2540737	2539869	277260	276415	SPBC19G7.05c	SPBC11B10.09	bgs1	cdc2	cps1|drc1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Le Goff X (1999)	10503548	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nuclear morphology	double mutants show an increase in the occurence of multi-nucleate cells	-	BIOGRID
740694	2540737	2540660	277260	277185	SPBC19G7.05c	SPBC21.06c	bgs1	cdc7	cps1|drc1	its10|pld1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Le Goff X (1999)	10503548	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue	the delay in cell cycle progression observed in cps1 is partially relieved in cells that cannot signal the onset of septum formation	-	BIOGRID
740695	2540737	2539149	277260	275721	SPBC19G7.05c	SPCC1739.11c	bgs1	cdc11	cps1|drc1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Le Goff X (1999)	10503548	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue	the delay in cell cycle progression observed in cps1 is partially relieved in cells that cannot signal the onset of septum formation	-	BIOGRID
740696	2540737	2540624	277260	277150	SPBC19G7.05c	SPBC24C6.07	bgs1	cdc14	cps1|drc1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Le Goff X (1999)	10503548	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue	the delay in cell cycle progression observed in cps1 is partially relieved in cells that cannot signal the onset of septum formation	-	BIOGRID
740697	2540737	2542761	277260	279211	SPBC19G7.05c	SPAC1565.06c	bgs1	spg1	cps1|drc1	sid3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Le Goff X (1999)	10503548	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue	the delay in cell cycle progression observed in cps1 is partially relieved in cells that cannot signal the onset of septum formation	-	BIOGRID
740698	2542358	2539513	278823	276075	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC645.05c	clp1	myo2	flp1	rng5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mishra M (2004)	15265986	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
740699	2542358	2541699	278823	278195	SPAC1782.09c	SPAP8A3.08	clp1	cdc4	flp1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mishra M (2004)	15265986	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
740700	2542358	2540737	278823	277260	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC19G7.05c	clp1	bgs1	flp1	cps1|drc1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mishra M (2004)	15265986	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
740701	2542358	2541975	278823	278460	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC20G8.05c	clp1	cdc15	flp1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mishra M (2004)	15265986	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
740702	2542358	2543129	278823	279561	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC4F8.13c	clp1	rng2	flp1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mishra M (2004)	15265986	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
740704	2542358	2542162	278823	278638	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC6F6.08c	clp1	cdc16	flp1	bub2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Mishra M (2004)	15265986	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation	double mutants show an increase in cells with two nuclei and an improper but complete division septum	-	BIOGRID
740705	2541863	2539653	278353	276208	SPAC22E12.07	SPBC16E9.13	rna1	ksp1	-	ppk20	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kusano A (2004)	15317843	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
754592	2542072	2539420	278549	275985	SPAP32A8.03c	SPCC970.07c	bop1	raf2	SPAP32A8.03c	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.99595888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754593	2542072	2543304	278549	279728	SPAP32A8.03c	SPAC6B12.12	bop1	tom70	SPAP32A8.03c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.229105594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754594	2542072	2540146	278549	276683	SPAP32A8.03c	SPBC17A3.06	bop1	SPBC17A3.06	SPAP32A8.03c	pi040	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.375971448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754595	2542072	2539189	278549	275760	SPAP32A8.03c	SPCC1682.16	bop1	rpt4	SPAP32A8.03c	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573574928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754596	2542072	2542094	278549	278571	SPAP32A8.03c	SPAC29B12.06c	bop1	rcd1	SPAP32A8.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.818203425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754597	2543423	2542577	279844	279033	SPAC4H3.07c	SPAC19G12.15c	SPAC4H3.07c	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452970928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754598	2543423	2539226	279844	275796	SPAC4H3.07c	SPCC16C4.20c	SPAC4H3.07c	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711571766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754599	2543423	2538801	279844	275382	SPAC4H3.07c	SPCC285.13c	SPAC4H3.07c	nup60	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094624739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754600	2543423	2539434	279844	275997	SPAC4H3.07c	SPCC757.09c	SPAC4H3.07c	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.501523236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754601	2543423	2541026	279844	277541	SPAC4H3.07c	SPBC337.09	SPAC4H3.07c	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9824561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754602	2543423	2542277	279844	278746	SPAC4H3.07c	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC4H3.07c	dbr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812969757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754603	2543423	2540797	279844	277316	SPAC4H3.07c	SPBC18H10.11c	SPAC4H3.07c	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.907830726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754604	2543423	2541578	279844	278075	SPAC4H3.07c	SPAC25B8.05	SPAC4H3.07c	deg1	-	SPAC25B8.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.259069191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754605	2543423	2542873	279844	279318	SPAC4H3.07c	SPAC9G1.02	SPAC4H3.07c	wis4	-	wak1|wik1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.000098568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754606	2543423	2542946	279844	279386	SPAC4H3.07c	SPAC6F12.03c	SPAC4H3.07c	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.698474358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754607	2543423	2542976	279844	279414	SPAC4H3.07c	SPAC9E9.09c	SPAC4H3.07c	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852024565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754608	2543423	2540229	279844	276761	SPAC4H3.07c	SPBC31F10.15c	SPAC4H3.07c	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.480399396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754609	2543423	2541927	279844	278415	SPAC4H3.07c	SPAC222.12c	SPAC4H3.07c	atp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453769705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754610	2543423	3361520	279844	280596	SPAC4H3.07c	SPAC1610.02c	SPAC4H3.07c	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189040654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754611	2543423	2542327	279844	278793	SPAC4H3.07c	SPAC16C9.06c	SPAC4H3.07c	upf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.386943077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754612	2543423	2540346	279844	276875	SPAC4H3.07c	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC4H3.07c	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571718466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754613	2543423	2541675	279844	278171	SPAC4H3.07c	SPAC22F8.12c	SPAC4H3.07c	shf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927946215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754614	2543423	2540108	279844	276645	SPAC4H3.07c	SPBC13E7.11	SPAC4H3.07c	rbd1	-	SPBC13E7.11|rh1|SPBC30D10.19c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700844332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754615	2543423	2542886	279844	279331	SPAC4H3.07c	SPAC1486.01	SPAC4H3.07c	SPAC1486.01	-	sod2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.230293537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754616	2543423	2541478	279844	277980	SPAC4H3.07c	SPAC2F7.17	SPAC4H3.07c	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.991924936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754617	2543423	2541875	279844	278365	SPAC4H3.07c	SPAC22F3.06c	SPAC4H3.07c	lon1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387749621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754618	2541619	2542165	278116	278641	SPAC27F1.09c	SPAC1782.08c	prp10	rex3	sap155|SF3b155	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.922889859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754619	2541619	2539023	278116	275596	SPAC27F1.09c	SPCC594.05c	prp10	spf1	sap155|SF3b155	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.394875014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754620	2541619	2540452	278116	276980	SPAC27F1.09c	SPBC2A9.11c	prp10	iss9	sap155|SF3b155	SPBC2A9.11c|SPBC2D10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.417358952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754621	2541619	2540533	278116	277061	SPAC27F1.09c	SPBC29A10.16c	prp10	SPBC29A10.16c	sap155|SF3b155	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.252144451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754622	2541619	3361389	278116	280465	SPAC27F1.09c	SPAC977.13c	prp10	SPAC977.13c	sap155|SF3b155	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.382056042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754623	2541619	2539772	278116	276323	SPAC27F1.09c	SPBC1734.05c	prp10	spf31	sap155|SF3b155	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.312435709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754624	2541619	2538840	278116	275421	SPAC27F1.09c	SPCC736.07c	prp10	SPCC736.07c	sap155|SF3b155	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809000516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754625	2540158	2542207	276693	278682	SPBC1105.08	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC1105.08	ddb1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.976494935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754626	2540158	2542598	276693	279052	SPBC1105.08	SPAC6G10.08	SPBC1105.08	idp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.265253591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754627	2540158	2542585	276693	279040	SPBC1105.08	SPAC31A2.13c	SPBC1105.08	sft1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.772063326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754628	2540158	2541913	276693	278403	SPBC1105.08	SPAC227.04	SPBC1105.08	atg10	-	SPAC227.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090857751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754629	2540158	2538732	276693	275316	SPBC1105.08	SPCC548.07c	SPBC1105.08	ght1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.925011615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754630	2540158	2542677	276693	279130	SPBC1105.08	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC1105.08	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.725982411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754631	2540158	2541092	276693	277607	SPBC1105.08	SPBC660.12c	SPBC1105.08	egt2	-	SPBC660.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866013632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754632	2540158	2540029	276693	276573	SPBC1105.08	SPBC16A3.01	SPBC1105.08	spn3	-	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.910687258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754633	2540158	2543685	276693	280099	SPBC1105.08	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC1105.08	rad55	-	rhp55	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817993708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754634	2540158	2542530	276693	278988	SPBC1105.08	SPAC1399.02	SPBC1105.08	SPAC1399.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194932282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754635	2540158	2542791	276693	279240	SPBC1105.08	SPAC167.04	SPBC1105.08	pam17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389443492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754636	2540158	2541834	276693	278325	SPBC1105.08	SPAC824.08	SPBC1105.08	gda1	-	gdp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.670746554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754637	2540158	2542863	276693	279309	SPBC1105.08	SPAC13G7.04c	SPBC1105.08	mac1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.845421068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754638	2540158	2541545	276693	278045	SPBC1105.08	SPAC22F8.07c	SPBC1105.08	rtf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873628685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754639	2540158	2542227	276693	278700	SPBC1105.08	SPAC5H10.13c	SPBC1105.08	gmh2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09070023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754640	2540158	2542469	276693	278930	SPBC1105.08	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC1105.08	erg5	-	cyp61	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.460258658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754641	2540158	2543495	276693	279914	SPBC1105.08	SPAC513.03	SPBC1105.08	mfm2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.505435204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754642	2540158	3361403	276693	280479	SPBC1105.08	SPAC27D7.12c	SPBC1105.08	but1	-	SPAC27D7.12|mug107|prx	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099523144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754643	2540158	2540741	276693	277264	SPBC1105.08	SPBC83.05	SPBC1105.08	SPBC83.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.023626133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754644	2540158	2540800	276693	277319	SPBC1105.08	SPBC409.20c	SPBC1105.08	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.206241193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754645	2540158	2541114	276693	277629	SPBC1105.08	SPBC582.09	SPBC1105.08	pex11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929946174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754646	2540158	2540928	276693	277444	SPBC1105.08	SPBC3E7.10	SPBC1105.08	fma1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.713330329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754647	2540158	2540936	276693	277452	SPBC1105.08	SPBC800.05c	SPBC1105.08	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444082418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754648	2540158	2539189	276693	275760	SPBC1105.08	SPCC1682.16	SPBC1105.08	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.768482449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754649	2540158	2543384	276693	279806	SPBC1105.08	SPAC637.06	SPBC1105.08	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.506707845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754650	2540158	2539599	276693	276157	SPBC1105.08	SPCP31B10.02	SPBC1105.08	SPCP31B10.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.271011708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754651	2540158	2543463	276693	279883	SPBC1105.08	SPAPB21F2.03	SPBC1105.08	slx9	-	SPAPB21F2.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196443308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754652	2540158	2543616	276693	280030	SPBC1105.08	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC1105.08	cwf21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.774147345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754653	2539050	2539774	275623	276325	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC17A3.10	rik1	pas4	-	pi036	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.77338221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754654	2539050	2542207	275623	278682	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC17H9.10c	rik1	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.946292789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754655	2539050	2541562	275623	278061	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC24B11.05	rik1	SPAC24B11.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.376119867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754656	2539050	2542862	275623	279308	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC140.03	rik1	arb1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.594995796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754657	2539050	2541475	275623	277977	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC24B11.09	rik1	mpc2	-	SPAC24B11.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989521808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754658	2539050	2540060	275623	276598	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC106.01	rik1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.784913904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754659	2539050	2543529	275623	279947	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC4C5.02c	rik1	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.625200574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754660	2539050	2542518	275623	278976	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC1B3.16c	rik1	vht1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.049293002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754661	2539050	2541513	275623	278014	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC227.13c	rik1	isu1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.912781823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754662	2539050	2542358	275623	278823	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC1782.09c	rik1	clp1	-	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.558081819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754663	2539050	2541650	275623	278146	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC14C4.12c	rik1	laf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503247711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754664	2539050	2542293	275623	278761	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC17G8.14c	rik1	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.086536671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754665	2539050	2542378	275623	278842	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC1805.04	rik1	nup132	-	Nup133b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816533528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754666	2539050	2540528	275623	277056	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC18H10.04c	rik1	sce3	-	tif48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037114105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754667	2539050	2542237	275623	278709	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC19E9.02	rik1	fin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.093646119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754668	2539050	2541856	275623	278347	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC23H3.08c	rik1	bub3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.745528347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754669	2539050	2542009	275623	278492	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC212.08c	rik1	SPAC212.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.882496129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754670	2539050	2541117	275623	277632	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC646.13	rik1	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.806964611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754671	2539050	2542917	275623	279358	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC9E9.11	rik1	plr1	-	plr	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.862176531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754672	2539050	2542103	275623	278579	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC31G5.11	rik1	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.10842367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754673	2539050	2538976	275623	275550	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC1840.04	rik1	pca1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.558997444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754674	2539050	2539226	275623	275796	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC16C4.20c	rik1	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.495127487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754675	2539050	2540975	275623	277491	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC354.12	rik1	gpd3	-	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.279250763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754676	2539050	2539420	275623	275985	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC970.07c	rik1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.085688499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754677	2539050	2541200	275623	277714	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC8D2.03c	rik1	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.21904915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754678	2539050	2542677	275623	279130	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC26F1.10c	rik1	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.96967266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754679	2539050	2540979	275623	277495	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC3H7.10	rik1	elp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.887748193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754680	2539050	2542273	275623	278742	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC17H9.13c	rik1	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.70445295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754681	2539050	2541058	275623	277573	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC3H7.09	rik1	erf2	-	mug142	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876125746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754682	2539050	2540945	275623	277461	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC342.06c	rik1	rtt109	-	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049020108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754683	2539050	2543453	275623	279873	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC3G9.03	rik1	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.37989636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754684	2539050	2539314	275623	275880	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC548.05c	rik1	dbl5	-	SPCC548.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.846691226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754685	2539050	2540425	275623	276953	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC27.06c	rik1	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703193563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754686	2539050	2542318	275623	278784	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC16C9.05	rik1	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.646007036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754687	2539050	2542023	275623	278506	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC20H4.10	rik1	ufd2	-	SPAC145.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.931609266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754688	2539050	2542277	275623	278746	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC17A5.02c	rik1	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.93421663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754689	2539050	2543685	275623	280099	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC3C7.03c	rik1	rad55	-	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.687325882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754690	2539050	2541311	275623	277823	SPCC11E10.08	SPBP8B7.09c	rik1	los1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928796852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754691	2539050	2539244	275623	275814	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC1672.06c	rik1	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.564920291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754692	2539050	2543078	275623	279511	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC31A2.15c	rik1	dcc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.982314912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754693	2539050	2541663	275623	278159	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC22G7.08	rik1	ppk8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.423403947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754694	2539050	2540825	275623	277343	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC428.08c	rik1	clr4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.225374322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754695	2539050	2541926	275623	278414	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC222.14c	rik1	SPAC222.14c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.083079767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754696	2539050	2542665	275623	279118	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC10F6.08c	rik1	nht10	-	nht1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.607779227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754697	2539050	2542568	275623	279024	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC1952.02	rik1	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.016903983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754698	2539050	2542239	275623	278711	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC18G6.02c	rik1	chp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.921515412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754699	2539050	2539960	275623	276504	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC15D4.15	rik1	pho2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.935526084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754700	2539050	2542311	275623	278777	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC16A10.05c	rik1	dad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.617369338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754701	2539050	2539051	275623	275624	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC1183.11	rik1	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329701035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754702	2539050	2541801	275623	278292	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC2F7.08c	rik1	snf5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.325420487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754703	2539050	2543461	275623	279881	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC521.03	rik1	SPAC521.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507502192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754704	2539050	2542646	275623	279100	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC11H11.05c	rik1	fta6	-	sma6	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.801769166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754705	2539050	2541776	275623	278270	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC23H3.05c	rik1	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51665439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754706	2539050	2542707	275623	279160	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC25G10.03	rik1	zip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321761436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754707	2539050	2542249	275623	278719	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC30D11.14c	rik1	SPAC30D11.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.823331715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754708	2539050	2542652	275623	279106	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC1687.15	rik1	gsk3	-	skp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.451476294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754709	2539050	2539984	275623	276528	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC1289.11	rik1	spf38	-	cwf17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.576806561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754710	2539050	2542123	275623	278599	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC18G6.15	rik1	mal3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.52959938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754711	2539050	2542507	275623	278965	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC18G6.13	rik1	SPAC18G6.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.343991738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754712	2539050	2540396	275623	276924	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC31F10.12	rik1	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.257287269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754713	2539050	2540673	275623	277198	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC1D7.03	rik1	mug80	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.197764734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754714	2539050	2539484	275623	276047	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC594.04c	rik1	SPCC594.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4167024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754715	2539050	2541496	275623	277998	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC23D3.09	rik1	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.177167709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754716	2539050	2541352	275623	277863	SPCC11E10.08	SPBPJ4664.03	rik1	mfm3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380423687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754717	2539050	2543118	275623	279550	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC3G6.11	rik1	chl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.053473911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754718	2539050	2543643	275623	280057	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC3G9.07c	rik1	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.855394148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754719	2539050	2540665	275623	277190	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC83.02c	rik1	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.510086878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754720	2539050	2542710	275623	279163	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC750.08c	rik1	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.471778315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754721	2539050	2540751	275623	277273	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC20F10.10	rik1	psl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.407126589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754722	2539050	2541326	275623	277838	SPCC11E10.08	SPBP35G2.03c	rik1	sgo1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382289325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754723	2539050	2542254	275623	278724	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC30D11.04c	rik1	nup124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.125944863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754724	2539050	2541900	275623	278390	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC23H4.17c	rik1	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.924334486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754725	2539050	2541009	275623	277524	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC428.04	rik1	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.932893396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754726	2539050	2539215	275623	275785	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC285.16c	rik1	msh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634391415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754727	2539050	2542056	275623	278535	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC6G9.14	rik1	SPAC6G9.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.87617837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754728	2539050	2542439	275623	278901	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC17A5.08	rik1	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807141807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754729	2539050	2542951	275623	279391	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC1071.05	rik1	SPAC1071.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811304657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754730	2539050	2541959	275623	278446	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC23C4.03	rik1	hrk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.313260752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754731	2539050	2542597	275623	279051	SPCC11E10.08	SPAP8A3.07c	rik1	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.691502767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754732	2539050	2542773	275623	279222	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC16.01	rik1	rho2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.978547333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754733	2539050	2541266	275623	277780	SPCC11E10.08	SPBP16F5.05c	rik1	yar1	-	SPBP16F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.426031184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754734	2539050	2541614	275623	278111	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC29A4.20	rik1	elp3	-	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.009322215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754735	2539050	2542255	275623	278725	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC57A7.08	rik1	pzh1	-	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.22154938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754736	2539050	2539812	275623	276362	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC1347.02	rik1	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.997839471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754737	2539050	2540193	275623	276726	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC1289.10c	rik1	adn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.066742359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754738	2539050	2542781	275623	279230	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC57A10.12c	rik1	ura3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.872758803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754739	2539050	2543515	275623	279933	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC4F10.14c	rik1	btf3	-	btt1|egd1|nac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.057729336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754740	2539050	2540930	275623	277446	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC354.10	rik1	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.623325586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754741	2539050	2540589	275623	277115	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC20F10.06	rik1	mad2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.28620396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754742	2539050	2538848	275623	275429	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC613.12c	rik1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869547061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754743	2539050	2541017	275623	277532	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC36.07	rik1	elp1	-	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.681409209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754744	2539050	2542869	275623	279314	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC140.02	rik1	gar2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.136273005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754745	2539050	2541144	275623	277659	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC685.06	rik1	rps001	-	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699714216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754746	2539050	2541628	275623	278124	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC110.02	rik1	pds5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.911180996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754747	2539050	2540821	275623	277339	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC800.03	rik1	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.217639108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754748	2539050	2539908	275623	276454	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC13E7.06	rik1	msd1	-	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.808307522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754749	2539050	2539763	275623	276314	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC1861.05	rik1	SPBC1861.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810085637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754750	2539050	2542198	275623	278673	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC6F12.09	rik1	rdp1	-	rdr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.197600826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754751	2539050	2541156	275623	277671	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC685.07c	rik1	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.628286862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754752	2539050	2542516	275623	278974	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC2F7.04	rik1	pmc2	-	med1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.189167542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754753	2539050	2543619	275623	280033	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC4F10.04	rik1	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.490763846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754754	2539050	2540619	275623	277145	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC25H2.15	rik1	SPBC25H2.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.983852621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754755	2539050	2543670	275623	280084	SPCC11E10.08	SPAPB1E7.06c	rik1	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.074677247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754756	2539050	2540498	275623	277026	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC27.02c	rik1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.736891612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754757	2539050	2542881	275623	279326	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC13F5.03c	rik1	gld1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987860513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754758	2539050	2539925	275623	276469	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC16H5.13	rik1	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.96676896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754759	2539050	2542541	275623	278998	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC1B3.03c	rik1	wis2	-	cyp5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.885225793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754760	2539050	2543096	275623	279528	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC977.05c	rik1	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.33683757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754761	2539050	2541372	275623	277883	SPCC11E10.08	SPBP8B7.28c	rik1	stc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.019816227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754762	2539050	2543066	275623	279499	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC343.12	rik1	rds1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.669637452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754763	2539050	2540115	275623	276652	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC1778.02	rik1	rap1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.997596507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754764	2539050	2539013	275623	275586	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC364.03	rik1	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.000986672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754765	2539050	2541470	275623	277972	SPCC11E10.08	SPAPYUG7.04c	rik1	rpb9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.418022826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754766	2539050	2540829	275623	277347	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC800.09	rik1	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504146972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754767	2539050	2542418	275623	278881	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC1805.07c	rik1	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.130651078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754768	2539050	2540677	275623	277202	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC21B10.03c	rik1	ath1	-	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.632959689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754769	2539050	2541789	275623	278281	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC23H4.08	rik1	iwr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205806005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754770	2539050	2539998	275623	276542	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC16G5.03	rik1	SPBC16G5.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.89330113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754771	2539050	2538787	275623	275368	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC364.02c	rik1	bis1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634675669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754772	2539050	2540936	275623	277452	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC800.05c	rik1	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.008387841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754773	2539050	2539928	275623	276472	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC1604.08c	rik1	imp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.266680113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754774	2539050	2540278	275623	276809	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC1A4.04	rik1	SPBC1A4.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.089524873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754775	2539050	2539920	275623	276464	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC119.08	rik1	pmk1	-	spm1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932038094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754776	2539050	2540896	275623	277412	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC19C2.13c	rik1	ctu2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.874984724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754777	2539050	2539375	275623	275941	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC4G3.11	rik1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389644013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754778	2539050	2543380	275623	279802	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC4G9.16c	rik1	rpl901	-	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.410494826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754779	2539050	2541941	275623	278428	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC20H4.03c	rik1	tfs1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.813191687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754780	2539050	2542021	275623	278504	SPCC11E10.08	SPAP14E8.02	rik1	tos4	-	SPAP14E8.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.884030269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754781	2539050	2539169	275623	275740	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC1235.11	rik1	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.383047432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754782	2539050	2543384	275623	279806	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC637.06	rik1	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509312832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754783	2539050	2543387	275623	279809	SPCC11E10.08	SPAPB1E7.02c	rik1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.772659045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754784	2539050	2543327	275623	279750	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC1D4.06c	rik1	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711554058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754785	2539050	2543471	275623	279891	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC513.07	rik1	SPAC513.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.937560265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754786	2539050	2540314	275623	276844	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC2G5.03	rik1	ctu1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.12784058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754787	2539050	2541491	275623	277993	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC2C4.16c	rik1	rps801	-	rps8|rps8-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.646394353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754788	2539050	2543372	275623	279794	SPCC11E10.08	SPAPB1A10.09	rik1	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.932415463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754789	2539050	2541177	275623	277691	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC725.05c	rik1	SPBC725.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.547886814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754790	2539050	2543646	275623	280060	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC821.07c	rik1	moc3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.392962559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754791	2539050	2541062	275623	277577	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC660.11	rik1	tcg1	-	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.250755445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754792	2539050	2538730	275623	275314	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC31H12.02c	rik1	mug73	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.193906531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754793	2541158	2542816	277673	279263	SPBC660.13c	SPAC4G8.11c	ssb1	atp10	rad11|rpa1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.077301559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754794	2541158	2541410	277673	277918	SPBC660.13c	SPBPB2B2.17c	ssb1	SPBPB2B2.17c	rad11|rpa1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.818833983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754795	2539783	2539841	276333	276389	SPBC1289.02c	SPBC17D1.05	uap2	SPBC17D1.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779743968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754796	2539783	2538961	276333	275535	SPBC1289.02c	SPCC285.14	uap2	trs130	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.899292271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754797	2539783	2542598	276333	279052	SPBC1289.02c	SPAC6G10.08	uap2	idp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197061773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754798	2539783	2540131	276333	276668	SPBC1289.02c	SPBC1778.05c	uap2	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.668929908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754799	2539783	2543320	276333	279744	SPBC1289.02c	SPAPJ695.01c	uap2	SPAPJ695.01c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.336225069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754800	2539783	2542468	276333	278929	SPBC1289.02c	SPAC1D4.09c	uap2	rtf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.698927017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754801	2539783	2539045	276333	275618	SPBC1289.02c	SPCC1235.05c	uap2	fft2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.904064557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754802	2539783	2543048	276333	279483	SPBC1289.02c	SPAC3F10.02c	uap2	trk1	-	sptrk	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.863404752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754803	2539783	2542165	276333	278641	SPBC1289.02c	SPAC1782.08c	uap2	rex3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.37981064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754804	2539783	2542318	276333	278784	SPBC1289.02c	SPAC16C9.05	uap2	cph1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.608685903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754805	2539783	2541560	276333	278059	SPBC1289.02c	SPAC24B11.12c	uap2	SPAC24B11.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.962177398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754806	2539783	2540595	276333	277121	SPBC1289.02c	SPBC21C3.02c	uap2	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.391511825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754807	2539783	2539175	276333	275746	SPBC1289.02c	SPCC16C4.01	uap2	sif2	-	SPCC5E4.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.081653428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754808	2539783	2539244	276333	275814	SPBC1289.02c	SPCC1672.06c	uap2	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.644531951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754809	2539783	2543563	276333	279979	SPBC1289.02c	SPAC664.02c	uap2	arp8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.013567536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754810	2539783	2538927	276333	275503	SPBC1289.02c	SPCC1795.09	uap2	yps1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.958322555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754811	2539783	2538906	276333	275483	SPBC1289.02c	SPCC1259.03	uap2	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.845336696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754812	2539783	2542845	276333	279291	SPBC1289.02c	SPAC824.04	uap2	SPAC824.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327217572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754813	2539783	2539310	276333	275877	SPBC1289.02c	SPCC285.17	uap2	spp27	-	uaf30	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981850936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754814	2539783	3361461	276333	280537	SPBC1289.02c	SPAC11H11.01	uap2	sst6	-	cps23	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.068025929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754815	2539783	2542249	276333	278719	SPBC1289.02c	SPAC30D11.14c	uap2	SPAC30D11.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.645380973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754816	2539783	2542507	276333	278965	SPBC1289.02c	SPAC18G6.13	uap2	SPAC18G6.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.374771406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754817	2539783	2543412	276333	279834	SPBC1289.02c	SPAC637.07	uap2	moe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.747761947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754818	2539783	2543643	276333	280057	SPBC1289.02c	SPAC3G9.07c	uap2	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.867163179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754819	2539783	2541899	276333	278389	SPBC1289.02c	SPAC22E12.11c	uap2	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256855755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754820	2539783	2540194	276333	276727	SPBC1289.02c	SPBC1709.09	uap2	rrf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.844456811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754821	2539783	2542710	276333	279163	SPBC1289.02c	SPAC750.08c	uap2	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.52945217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754822	2539783	2540836	276333	277354	SPBC1289.02c	SPBC18H10.19	uap2	vps38	-	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.476102341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754823	2539783	2540077	276333	276615	SPBC1289.02c	SPBC17D11.04c	uap2	nto1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.190463654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754824	2539783	2539953	276333	276497	SPBC1289.02c	SPBC1709.11c	uap2	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.168809932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754825	2539783	2540967	276333	277483	SPBC1289.02c	SPBC36B7.08c	uap2	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383659167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754826	2539783	2539847	276333	276395	SPBC1289.02c	SPBC530.14c	uap2	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.150718514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754827	2539783	2539303	276333	275871	SPBC1289.02c	SPCC1020.09	uap2	gnr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.651609268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754828	2539783	2539213	276333	275783	SPBC1289.02c	SPCC285.10c	uap2	SPCC285.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.209604259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754829	2539783	2539527	276333	276089	SPBC1289.02c	SPCC338.16	uap2	pof3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.804133166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754830	2539783	2542170	276333	278645	SPBC1289.02c	SPAC17G8.13c	uap2	mst2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.508229281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754831	2539783	2542806	276333	279254	SPBC1289.02c	SPAC1610.01	uap2	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.779835967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754832	2539783	2539354	276333	275920	SPBC1289.02c	SPCC4F11.03c	uap2	SPCC4F11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.82059098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754833	2539783	2539362	276333	275928	SPBC1289.02c	SPCC18B5.10c	uap2	SPCC18B5.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.954081287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754834	2539783	2539555	276333	276116	SPBC1289.02c	SPCC4B3.08	uap2	lsg1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.239455964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754835	2539783	2540935	276333	277451	SPBC1289.02c	SPBC359.04c	uap2	pfl7	-	SPBC359.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.951700811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754836	2539783	2541531	276333	278031	SPBC1289.02c	SPAC25A8.01c	uap2	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.716785905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754837	2539783	2541470	276333	277972	SPBC1289.02c	SPAPYUG7.04c	uap2	rpb9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.023999827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754838	2539783	2540677	276333	277202	SPBC1289.02c	SPBC21B10.03c	uap2	ath1	-	SPBC21B10.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.805764225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754839	2539783	2539729	276333	276281	SPBC1289.02c	SPBC11B10.07c	uap2	ivn1	-	pi004|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038174406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754840	2539783	2543091	276333	279524	SPBC1289.02c	SPAC12G12.15	uap2	sif3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.144327951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754841	2539783	2542222	276333	278695	SPBC1289.02c	SPAC31G5.18c	uap2	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.98788304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754842	2539783	2542635	276333	279089	SPBC1289.02c	SPAC24H6.09	uap2	gef1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.391006691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754843	2539783	2542628	276333	279082	SPBC1289.02c	SPAC24H6.06	uap2	sld3	-	mug175	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19989613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754844	2539783	2540146	276333	276683	SPBC1289.02c	SPBC17A3.06	uap2	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.198757849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754845	2539783	2542244	276333	278714	SPBC1289.02c	SPAC19G12.13c	uap2	poz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.547317748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754846	2539783	2542021	276333	278504	SPBC1289.02c	SPAP14E8.02	uap2	tos4	-	SPAP14E8.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.843529585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754847	2539783	2541806	276333	278297	SPBC1289.02c	SPAC4G8.13c	uap2	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.544523254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754848	2539783	2543327	276333	279750	SPBC1289.02c	SPAC1D4.06c	uap2	csk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046285631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754849	2539783	2542943	276333	279384	SPBC1289.02c	SPBC1348.03	uap2	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.425393324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754850	2539783	2543472	276333	279892	SPBC1289.02c	SPAC959.04c	uap2	omh6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098231848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754851	2539783	2539494	276333	276057	SPBC1289.02c	SPCC4G3.08	uap2	psk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.80702822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754852	2539783	2540734	276333	277257	SPBC1289.02c	SPBC19G7.09	uap2	ulp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.41247453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754853	2539804	2541902	276354	278392	SPBC1105.11c	SPAC27E2.07	hht3	pvg2	h3.3	mug53	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637885975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754854	2539804	2541903	276354	278393	SPBC1105.11c	SPAC22F8.05	hht3	SPAC22F8.05	h3.3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.839213733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754855	2542531	2539876	278989	276422	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC1734.07c	cwf2	trs8502	prp3|cwc2	SPBC1734.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442084073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754856	2542531	2540150	278989	276687	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC16E9.14c	cwf2	zrg17	prp3|cwc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.480889863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754857	2542531	2543633	278989	280047	SPAC3A12.11c	SPAC3H8.05c	cwf2	mms1	prp3|cwc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639253533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754858	2543565	2542237	279981	278709	SPAPB24D3.04c	SPAC19E9.02	mag1	fin1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.802114013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754859	2543565	2538976	279981	275550	SPAPB24D3.04c	SPCC1840.04	mag1	pca1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.030483031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754860	2543565	2542165	279981	278641	SPAPB24D3.04c	SPAC1782.08c	mag1	rex3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928776014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754861	2543565	2542268	279981	278737	SPAPB24D3.04c	SPAC17A5.07c	mag1	ulp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568833101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754862	2543565	2539845	279981	276393	SPAPB24D3.04c	SPBC12C2.02c	mag1	ste20	-	ste16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194271917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754863	2543565	2542123	279981	278599	SPAPB24D3.04c	SPAC18G6.15	mag1	mal3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.357169714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754864	2543565	5802861	279981	857999	SPAPB24D3.04c	SPAC1D4.01	mag1	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147194659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754865	2543565	2543009	279981	279447	SPAPB24D3.04c	SPAC10F6.06	mag1	vip1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820694996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754866	2543565	2543304	279981	279728	SPAPB24D3.04c	SPAC6B12.12	mag1	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.282040768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754867	2543565	2543160	279981	279591	SPAPB24D3.04c	SPAC31A2.14	mag1	bun107	-	wdr48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813821804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754868	2543565	2543109	279981	279541	SPAPB24D3.04c	SPAC3G6.09c	mag1	tps2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.850074048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754869	2543565	2539375	279981	275941	SPAPB24D3.04c	SPCC4G3.11	mag1	mug154	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.802063178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754870	2543565	2542154	279981	278630	SPAPB24D3.04c	SPAC17G8.02	mag1	SPAC17G8.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387836009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754871	2540837	2541475	277355	277977	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC24B11.09	ubp4	mpc2	-	SPAC24B11.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.276858901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754872	2540837	2543529	277355	279947	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC4C5.02c	ubp4	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.173002138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754873	2540837	2541656	277355	278152	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC25H1.06	ubp4	pcf3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.132606241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754874	2540837	2543064	277355	279497	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC3G6.01	ubp4	hrp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.613338428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754875	2540837	2542197	277355	278672	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC1142.01	ubp4	rqc1	-	SPAC1142.01|SPAC17G6.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.989295255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754876	2540837	2543575	277355	279990	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC644.13c	ubp4	SPAC644.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.063408334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754877	2540837	2543211	277355	279640	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC12B10.15c	ubp4	SPAC12B10.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388704858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754878	2540837	2540198	277355	276731	SPBC18H10.08c	SPBC1709.04c	ubp4	cyp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.266748678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754879	2540837	2541621	277355	278118	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC29A4.17c	ubp4	SPAC29A4.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.569817276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754880	2540837	2541438	277355	277943	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC23G3.10c	ubp4	ssr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.92115588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754881	2540837	2542009	277355	278492	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC212.08c	ubp4	SPAC212.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929438705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754882	2540837	2542963	277355	279403	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC1071.03c	ubp4	sil1	-	SPAC1071.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196185392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754883	2540837	2542071	277355	278548	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC26H5.03	ubp4	pcf2	-	cac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.314874926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754884	2540837	2540826	277355	277344	SPBC18H10.08c	SPBC409.17c	ubp4	SPBC409.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569529599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754885	2540837	2538847	277355	275428	SPBC18H10.08c	SPCC594.06c	ubp4	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987487932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754886	2540837	2542273	277355	278742	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC17H9.13c	ubp4	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.748389102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754887	2540837	2541500	277355	278002	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC227.18	ubp4	lys3	-	SPAC2F7.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.497386816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754888	2540837	2542689	277355	279142	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC29B12.04	ubp4	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.710226092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754889	2540837	2542724	277355	279175	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC767.01c	ubp4	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387057599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754890	2540837	2540919	277355	277435	SPBC18H10.08c	SPBC543.07	ubp4	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.98754435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754891	2540837	2540306	277355	276836	SPBC18H10.08c	SPBC2G5.02c	ubp4	ckb2	-	SPBC2G5.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.71459095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754892	2540837	2542627	277355	279081	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC750.04c	ubp4	SPAC750.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51774507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754893	2540837	2543053	277355	279487	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC10F6.15	ubp4	SPAC10F6.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703170247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754894	2540837	2540929	277355	277445	SPBC18H10.08c	SPBC354.03	ubp4	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189115666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754895	2540837	2539792	277355	276342	SPBC18H10.08c	SPBC1271.14	ubp4	SPBC1271.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.692133837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754896	2540837	2543685	277355	280099	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC3C7.03c	ubp4	rad55	-	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.209059203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754897	2540837	2543615	277355	280029	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC4F8.08	ubp4	mug114	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32261907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754898	2540837	2539237	277355	275807	SPBC18H10.08c	SPCC24B10.13	ubp4	skb5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865292934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754899	2540837	2542484	277355	278944	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC1A6.07	ubp4	sle1	-	SPAC1A6.07|seg1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.326273974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754900	2540837	2541754	277355	278248	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC2E1P3.04	ubp4	cao1	-	spao1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.125592003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754901	2540837	2542971	277355	279410	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC105.02c	ubp4	SPAC105.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387141194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754902	2540837	2543208	277355	279637	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC328.04	ubp4	SPAC328.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.12371228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754903	2540837	2539999	277355	276543	SPBC18H10.08c	SPBC1734.15	ubp4	rsc4	-	brd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817599208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754904	2540837	2541183	277355	277697	SPBC18H10.08c	SPBC725.14	ubp4	arg6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.992374379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754905	2540837	2541929	277355	278417	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC23C4.12	ubp4	hhp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440558067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754906	2540837	2541451	277355	277956	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC23G3.02c	ubp4	sib1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446783854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754907	2540837	2539815	277355	276365	SPBC18H10.08c	SPBC1105.02c	ubp4	lys4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.017778796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754908	2540837	2541720	277355	278214	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC23H3.13c	ubp4	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386277205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754909	2540837	2542431	277355	278893	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC1A6.01c	ubp4	SPAC1A6.01c	-	SPAC23C4.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980879426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754910	2540837	2542867	277355	279312	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC343.16	ubp4	lys2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.153235063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754911	2540837	2543105	277355	279537	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC343.10	ubp4	met11	-	mthfr2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.32103053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754912	2540837	2539215	277355	275785	SPBC18H10.08c	SPCC285.16c	ubp4	msh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509714141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754913	2540837	5802861	277355	857999	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC1D4.01	ubp4	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386591279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754914	2540837	2543576	277355	279991	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC4A8.05c	ubp4	myp2	-	myo3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327613081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754915	2540837	2542951	277355	279391	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC1071.05	ubp4	SPAC1071.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048375513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754916	2540837	2542996	277355	279434	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC1039.06	ubp4	SPAC1039.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389280179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754917	2540837	2543517	277355	279935	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC3G9.05	ubp4	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.005070871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754918	2540837	2540104	277355	276641	SPBC18H10.08c	SPBC1709.16c	ubp4	SPBC1709.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.19981221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754919	2540837	2539498	277355	276061	SPBC18H10.08c	SPCC645.11c	ubp4	mug117	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572552784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754920	2540837	2542060	277355	278538	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC23C11.14	ubp4	zhf1	-	zhf	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452488974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754921	2540837	2539993	277355	276537	SPBC18H10.08c	SPBC1105.05	ubp4	exg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.063489896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754922	2540837	2541409	277355	277917	SPBC18H10.08c	SPBC1271.06c	ubp4	mug96	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979389422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754923	2540837	2541222	277355	277736	SPBC18H10.08c	SPBC887.08	ubp4	SPBC887.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328131508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754924	2540837	2543391	277355	279813	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC4G9.09c	ubp4	arg11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.044297377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754925	2540837	2543071	277355	279504	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC3C7.06c	ubp4	pit1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86949114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754926	2540837	2543191	277355	279620	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC3C7.05c	ubp4	mug191	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872462416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754927	2540837	2542883	277355	279328	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC1486.04c	ubp4	alm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.745621341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754928	2540837	2543600	277355	280015	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAPB1A10.05	ubp4	SPAPB1A10.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.185280879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754929	2540837	2542947	277355	279387	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC11D3.03c	ubp4	SPAC11D3.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514061205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754930	2540837	2541459	277355	277961	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC227.11c	ubp4	SPAC227.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771235263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754931	2540837	2543377	277355	279799	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC3H1.07	ubp4	aru1	-	car3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.630707233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754932	2540837	2540629	277355	277155	SPBC18H10.08c	SPBC21D10.09c	ubp4	rkr1	-	SPBC21D10.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814803377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754933	2540837	2542840	277355	279286	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC13G6.08	ubp4	SPAC13G6.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.102559584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754934	2540837	2543582	277355	279997	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC4H3.06	ubp4	SPAC4H3.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.117327303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754935	2540837	2543044	277355	279479	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC3C7.12	ubp4	tip1	-	noc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.15244084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754936	2540837	2542838	277355	279284	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC13G7.11	ubp4	SPAC13G7.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87176367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754937	2540837	2542059	277355	278537	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC328.06	ubp4	ubp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.907073794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754938	2540837	2542716	277355	279169	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC25H1.07	ubp4	emc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.673219912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754939	2540837	2539743	277355	276295	SPBC18H10.08c	SPBC16A3.08c	ubp4	oga1	-	SPBC16A3.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576700381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754940	2540837	2541050	277355	277565	SPBC18H10.08c	SPBC428.05c	ubp4	arg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.57024755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754941	2540837	2539976	277355	276520	SPBC18H10.08c	SPBC1683.07	ubp4	mal1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037859457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754942	2540837	3361512	277355	280588	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC3C7.01c	ubp4	sac12	-	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810520001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754943	2540837	2542617	277355	279071	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC13A11.01c	ubp4	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.429909746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754944	2540837	2542609	277355	279063	SPBC18H10.08c	SPAC31G5.04	ubp4	lys12	-	SPAC31G5.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771983607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754945	2542884	2542895	279329	279339	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC13G6.10c	dsc2	asl1	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645564547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754946	2542884	2541475	279329	277977	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC24B11.09	dsc2	mpc2	ucp14	SPAC24B11.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.652186981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754947	2542884	2542577	279329	279033	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC19G12.15c	dsc2	tpp1	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.944237374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754948	2542884	2542291	279329	278759	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC17C9.08	dsc2	pnu1	ucp14	end1|nuc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.282296778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754949	2542884	2543637	279329	280051	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC3H8.02	dsc2	csr102	ucp14	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.678953976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754950	2542884	2540524	279329	277052	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC21B10.08c	dsc2	SPBC21B10.08c	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.754769668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754951	2542884	2539035	279329	275608	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC794.09c	dsc2	tef101	ucp14	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.846177656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754952	2542884	2542614	279329	279068	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC1399.04c	dsc2	SPAC1399.04c	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.698349847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754953	2542884	2541964	279329	278450	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC2F3.08	dsc2	sut1	ucp14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153955793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754954	2542884	2543030	279329	279466	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC12B10.10	dsc2	nod1	ucp14	SPAC12B10.10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633144743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754955	2542884	2542012	279329	278495	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC23C11.02c	dsc2	rps23	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.48040148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754956	2542884	2539302	279329	275870	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC126.09	dsc2	zip2	ucp14	SPCC126.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.753350401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754957	2542884	2539823	279329	276373	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC16A3.18	dsc2	cip1	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320616601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754958	2542884	2542220	279329	278694	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC1A6.03c	dsc2	SPAC1A6.03c	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.002282724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754959	2542884	2540263	279329	276794	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC32H8.02c	dsc2	nep2	ucp14	mug120|pi021|SPACTOKYO_453.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.927022546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754960	2542884	2538698	279329	275283	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC1442.02	dsc2	SPCC1442.02	ucp14	SPCC1450.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.050169018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754961	2542884	2541522	279329	278023	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC23E2.01	dsc2	fep1	ucp14	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.074210969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754962	2542884	2542554	279329	279011	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC1952.03	dsc2	otu2	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.688341356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754963	2542884	3361461	279329	280537	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC11H11.01	dsc2	sst6	ucp14	cps23	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.625669093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754964	2542884	2539051	279329	275624	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC1183.11	dsc2	msy1	ucp14	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.796064132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754965	2542884	2542950	279329	279390	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC12B10.03	dsc2	bun62	ucp14	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.011533653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754966	2542884	2542863	279329	279309	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC13G7.04c	dsc2	mac1	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.322333599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754967	2542884	2543593	279329	280008	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC4G9.10	dsc2	arg3	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.119150627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754968	2542884	2541545	279329	278045	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC22F8.07c	dsc2	rtf1	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.71376722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754969	2542884	2541038	279329	277553	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC29A10.01	dsc2	ccr1	ucp14	SPBC365.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.034223924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754970	2542884	2539898	279329	276444	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC12D12.07c	dsc2	trx2	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639888009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754971	2542884	2539603	279329	276161	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC1289.06c	dsc2	ppr8	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.889622999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754972	2542884	2542357	279329	278822	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC1782.07	dsc2	qcr8	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.176176191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754973	2542884	2542710	279329	279163	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC750.08c	dsc2	SPAC750.08c	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.590517763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754974	2542884	2542946	279329	279386	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC6F12.03c	dsc2	fsv1	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.870666941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754975	2542884	2542254	279329	278724	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC30D11.04c	dsc2	nup124	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.928102359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754976	2542884	2543301	279329	279726	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC977.17	dsc2	SPAC977.17	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637169685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754977	2542884	2542519	279329	278977	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC19G12.08	dsc2	scs7	ucp14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935078992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754978	2542884	2541053	279329	277568	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC56F2.10c	dsc2	alg5	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.37848048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754979	2542884	2539427	279329	275992	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC663.15c	dsc2	SPCC663.15c	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.12146496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754980	2542884	2539213	279329	275783	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC285.10c	dsc2	SPCC285.10c	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317912238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754981	2542884	2539763	279329	276314	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC1861.05	dsc2	SPBC1861.05	ucp14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992614916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754982	2542884	2543391	279329	279813	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC4G9.09c	dsc2	arg11	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.131511981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754983	2542884	2542759	279329	279209	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC9G1.07	dsc2	SPAC9G1.07	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709523394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754984	2542884	2538762	279329	275345	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC306.04c	dsc2	set1	ucp14	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.443460051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754985	2542884	2541175	279329	277689	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC839.13c	dsc2	rpl1601	ucp14	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.717295847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754986	2542884	2540800	279329	277319	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC409.20c	dsc2	psh3	ucp14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094259309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754987	2542884	2540152	279329	276688	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC12C2.03c	dsc2	SPBC12C2.03c	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323356501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754988	2542884	2540960	279329	277476	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC3D6.02	dsc2	but2	ucp14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.80695666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754989	2542884	2539239	279329	275809	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC1020.10	dsc2	oca2	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317839676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754990	2542884	2540725	279329	277248	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC215.14c	dsc2	vps20	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.199638556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754991	2542884	2538756	279329	275339	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC1795.10c	dsc2	SPCC1795.10c	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.330388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754992	2542884	2542403	279329	278867	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC19A8.05c	dsc2	sst4	ucp14	vps27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.347866962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754993	2542884	2541404	279329	277913	SPAC1486.02c	SPBPB2B2.18	dsc2	SPBPB2B2.18	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319435062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754994	2542884	2541380	279329	277891	SPAC1486.02c	SPBPB2B2.13	dsc2	gal1	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.934265131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754995	2542884	2540146	279329	276683	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC17A3.06	dsc2	SPBC17A3.06	ucp14	pi040	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.841897342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754996	2542884	2539169	279329	275740	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC1235.11	dsc2	mpc1	ucp14	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.880319264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754997	2542884	2538854	279329	275435	SPAC1486.02c	SPCP1E11.05c	dsc2	are2	ucp14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145314907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754998	2542884	2540828	279329	277346	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC4B4.06	dsc2	vps25	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.492822794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
754999	2542884	2539743	279329	276295	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC16A3.08c	dsc2	oga1	ucp14	SPBC16A3.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.874142644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755000	2542884	2541478	279329	277980	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC2F7.17	dsc2	mrf1	ucp14	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.466640365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755001	2542884	2543024	279329	279460	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC1039.02	dsc2	SPAC1039.02	ucp14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580202661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755002	2540154	2540491	276690	277019	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC28E12.04	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.182934152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755003	2540154	2541361	276690	277872	SPBC16C6.05	SPBP8B7.10c	SPBC16C6.05	utp16	-	SPBP8B7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.408106596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755004	2540154	2540015	276690	276559	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC1685.02c	SPBC16C6.05	rps1202	-	rps12-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.48754172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755005	2540154	2539235	276690	275805	SPBC16C6.05	SPCC1682.15	SPBC16C6.05	mug122	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205112827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755006	2540154	2540929	276690	277445	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC354.03	SPBC16C6.05	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05603686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755007	2540154	2542318	276690	278784	SPBC16C6.05	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC16C6.05	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.458151027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755008	2540154	2543584	276690	279999	SPBC16C6.05	SPAPB1E7.11c	SPBC16C6.05	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.139936817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755009	2540154	2540319	276690	276849	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC30D10.16	SPBC16C6.05	pha2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377669308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755010	2540154	2539310	276690	275877	SPBC16C6.05	SPCC285.17	SPBC16C6.05	spp27	-	uaf30	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.050122632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755011	2540154	2542950	276690	279390	SPBC16C6.05	SPAC12B10.03	SPBC16C6.05	bun62	-	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575988777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755012	2540154	2540797	276690	277316	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC18H10.11c	SPBC16C6.05	ppr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.258098285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755013	2540154	2542863	276690	279309	SPBC16C6.05	SPAC13G7.04c	SPBC16C6.05	mac1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.160582217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755014	2540154	2540396	276690	276924	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC31F10.12	SPBC16C6.05	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097976487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755015	2540154	2539831	276690	276380	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC15C4.05	SPBC16C6.05	dhx29	-	SPBC15C4.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568784838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755016	2540154	2538769	276690	275352	SPBC16C6.05	SPCC126.04c	SPBC16C6.05	sgf73	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994027203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755017	2540154	2542032	276690	278514	SPBC16C6.05	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC16C6.05	pnk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.068296419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755018	2540154	2542710	276690	279163	SPBC16C6.05	SPAC750.08c	SPBC16C6.05	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.969397319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755019	2540154	2543357	276690	279779	SPBC16C6.05	SPAC688.12c	SPBC16C6.05	SPAC688.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.395321297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755020	2540154	2541009	276690	277524	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC428.04	SPBC16C6.05	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.338413219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755021	2540154	2542439	276690	278901	SPBC16C6.05	SPAC17A5.08	SPBC16C6.05	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811178615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755022	2540154	2541536	276690	278036	SPBC16C6.05	SPAC1071.02	SPBC16C6.05	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.054693041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755023	2540154	2540180	276690	276713	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC16D10.11c	SPBC16C6.05	rps1801	-	rps18-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.805051825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755024	2540154	2539213	276690	275783	SPBC16C6.05	SPCC285.10c	SPBC16C6.05	SPCC285.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.413996548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755025	2540154	2543515	276690	279933	SPBC16C6.05	SPAC4F10.14c	SPBC16C6.05	btf3	-	btt1|egd1|nac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.522158056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755026	2540154	2539519	276690	276081	SPBC16C6.05	SPCC364.05	SPBC16C6.05	vps3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.80238973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755027	2540154	2541742	276690	278236	SPBC16C6.05	SPAC22H10.09	SPBC16C6.05	SPAC22H10.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.062940088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755028	2540154	2539908	276690	276454	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC13E7.06	SPBC16C6.05	msd1	-	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.790929337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755029	2540154	2542759	276690	279209	SPBC16C6.05	SPAC9G1.07	SPBC16C6.05	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.926887693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755030	2540154	2543670	276690	280084	SPBC16C6.05	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC16C6.05	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.759474988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755031	2540154	2543304	276690	279728	SPBC16C6.05	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC16C6.05	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.803724166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755032	2540154	2541425	276690	277930	SPBC16C6.05	SPAC2C4.17c	SPBC16C6.05	msy2	-	SPAC2C4.17c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.14550164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755033	2540154	2543380	276690	279802	SPBC16C6.05	SPAC4G9.16c	SPBC16C6.05	rpl901	-	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.822926196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755034	2540154	2539178	276690	275749	SPBC16C6.05	SPCC1682.14	SPBC16C6.05	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.311880995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755035	2540154	2541478	276690	277980	SPBC16C6.05	SPAC2F7.17	SPBC16C6.05	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.682083533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755036	2540154	3361295	276690	280371	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC1921.01c	SPBC16C6.05	rpl35b	-	rpl37|rpl37-1|rpl3701|SPBC29C10.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982619222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755037	2540154	2542943	276690	279384	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC1348.03	SPBC16C6.05	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.846664884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755038	2540154	2538730	276690	275314	SPBC16C6.05	SPCC31H12.02c	SPBC16C6.05	mug73	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.200070314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755039	2541975	2542816	278460	279263	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC4G8.11c	cdc15	atp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842234047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755040	2539667	2539841	276222	276389	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC17D1.05	ash2	SPBC17D1.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.37826398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755041	2539667	2540105	276222	276642	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC106.04	ash2	ada1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.39792428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755042	2539667	2542812	276222	279259	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC6F6.01	ash2	cch1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.770200413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755043	2539667	2543064	276222	279497	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC3G6.01	ash2	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.22070295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755044	2539667	2542378	276222	278842	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC1805.04	ash2	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049089604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755045	2539667	2542237	276222	278709	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC19E9.02	ash2	fin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.306220378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755046	2539667	2539930	276222	276474	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC1198.11c	ash2	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.962283557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755047	2539667	3361561	276222	280637	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC11E3.01c	ash2	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.891276436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755048	2539667	2540347	276222	276876	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC30B4.08	ash2	eri1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.067471927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755049	2539667	2543164	276222	279595	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC3G6.06c	ash2	rad2	-	fen1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.207460408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755050	2539667	2540686	276222	277211	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC21D10.10	ash2	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.97942584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755051	2539667	2538922	276222	275499	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC16C4.10	ash2	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.561235471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755052	2539667	2539309	276222	275876	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC4G3.19	ash2	alp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.532493837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755053	2539667	3361436	276222	280512	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC1296.01c	ash2	SPAC1296.01c	-	SPAC22F3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640401816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755054	2539667	2539226	276222	275796	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC16C4.20c	ash2	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.645988953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755055	2539667	2541200	276222	277714	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC8D2.03c	ash2	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.862110853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755056	2539667	2542468	276222	278929	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC1D4.09c	ash2	rtf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515634725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755057	2539667	2542677	276222	279130	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC26F1.10c	ash2	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.336945799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755058	2539667	2538847	276222	275428	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC594.06c	ash2	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.059060249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755059	2539667	2539564	276222	276125	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC550.12	ash2	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.804662238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755060	2539667	2538801	276222	275382	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC285.13c	ash2	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.747906753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755061	2539667	2542724	276222	279175	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC767.01c	ash2	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.935748579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755062	2539667	2539249	276222	275819	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC1450.05c	ash2	rox3	-	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.759203736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755063	2539667	2540306	276222	276836	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC2G5.02c	ash2	ckb2	-	SPBC2G5.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.673739912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755064	2539667	2539434	276222	275997	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC757.09c	ash2	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.056166985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755065	2539667	2542555	276222	279012	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC1952.06c	ash2	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3718831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755066	2539667	2540220	276222	276753	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC337.03	ash2	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.894409149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755067	2539667	2539797	276222	276347	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC16G5.14c	ash2	rps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.678451049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755068	2539667	2540929	276222	277445	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC354.03	ash2	swd3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096648504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755069	2539667	2542023	276222	278506	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC20H4.10	ash2	ufd2	-	SPAC145.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.084886521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755070	2539667	2542277	276222	278746	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC17A5.02c	ash2	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.984353751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755071	2539667	2542220	276222	278694	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC1A6.03c	ash2	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.557591627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755072	2539667	2541580	276222	278077	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC1687.05	ash2	pli1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.56242082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755073	2539667	2539244	276222	275814	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC1672.06c	ash2	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.414696163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755074	2539667	2543563	276222	279979	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC664.02c	ash2	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.219270819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755075	2539667	2543426	276222	279846	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC631.02	ash2	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.9979582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755076	2539667	2539352	276222	275918	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC188.07	ash2	ccq1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.340136607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755077	2539667	2543319	276222	279743	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC6B12.09	ash2	trm10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.555200374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755078	2539667	3361543	276222	280619	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC9.13c	ash2	cwf16	-	SPAPJ735.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.008266706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755079	2539667	2541926	276222	278414	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC222.14c	ash2	SPAC222.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.287599211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755080	2539667	2542558	276222	279014	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC1952.07	ash2	rad1	-	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.134040162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755081	2539667	2542568	276222	279024	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC1952.02	ash2	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.352509208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755082	2539667	2539023	276222	275596	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC594.05c	ash2	spf1	-	spp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873776835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755083	2539667	2539467	276222	276030	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC417.07c	ash2	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.27732222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755084	2539667	2539051	276222	275624	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC1183.11	ash2	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.3859402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755085	2539667	2540892	276222	277408	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC530.01	ash2	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.340092705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755086	2539667	2542513	276222	278971	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC1952.05	ash2	gcn5	-	kat2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.802798053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755087	2539667	2541776	276222	278270	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC23H3.05c	ash2	swd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.780837258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755088	2539667	2542707	276222	279160	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC25G10.03	ash2	zip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.910037067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755089	2539667	2539845	276222	276393	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC12C2.02c	ash2	ste20	-	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.751003927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755090	2539667	2542507	276222	278965	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC18G6.13	ash2	SPAC18G6.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.264030582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755091	2539667	2543412	276222	279834	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC637.07	ash2	moe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.430506681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755092	2539667	2539733	276222	276285	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC16E9.12c	ash2	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.22702331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755093	2539667	2540673	276222	277198	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC1D7.03	ash2	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.539073113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755094	2539667	2539999	276222	276543	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC1734.15	ash2	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.801639264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755095	2539667	2541496	276222	277998	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC23D3.09	ash2	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.24018977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755096	2539667	2543667	276222	280081	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC4H3.02c	ash2	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.338735822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755097	2539667	2543643	276222	280057	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC3G9.07c	ash2	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.008498775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755098	2539667	2541899	276222	278389	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC22E12.11c	ash2	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.725519763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755099	2539667	2540831	276222	277349	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC428.02c	ash2	eca39	-	SPBC582.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.186151199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755100	2539667	2541710	276222	278205	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC343.11c	ash2	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.142104036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755101	2539667	2540665	276222	277190	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC83.02c	ash2	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326424613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755102	2539667	2540232	276222	276764	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC336.10c	ash2	tif512	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.921247582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755103	2539667	2539232	276222	275802	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC1223.04c	ash2	set11	-	mug76	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.599525048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755104	2539667	2543378	276222	279800	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC3H8.07c	ash2	pac10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.89710433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755105	2539667	2541900	276222	278390	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC23H4.17c	ash2	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.465244479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755106	2539667	2539408	276222	275973	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC576.12c	ash2	mhf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.270164637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755107	2539667	2539481	276222	276044	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC622.16c	ash2	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.70211065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755108	2539667	2539953	276222	276497	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC1709.11c	ash2	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.592265318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755109	2539667	2542439	276222	278901	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC17A5.08	ash2	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.31825157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755110	2539667	2543443	276222	279863	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC3H1.12c	ash2	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.071790054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755111	2539667	2540967	276222	277483	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC36B7.08c	ash2	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.898935474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755112	2539667	2540599	276222	277125	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC29A3.10c	ash2	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.977063378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755113	2539667	2543517	276222	279935	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC3G9.05	ash2	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.44149689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755114	2539667	2542060	276222	278538	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC23C11.14	ash2	zhf1	-	zhf	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639730853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755115	2539667	2542255	276222	278725	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC57A7.08	ash2	pzh1	-	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.616381575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755116	2539667	2541488	276222	277990	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC227.17c	ash2	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.457897061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755117	2539667	2541337	276222	277848	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBP35G2.13c	ash2	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.922923686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755118	2539667	2540930	276222	277446	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC354.10	ash2	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387309228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755119	2539667	2540643	276222	277168	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC19G7.06	ash2	mbx1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.132392699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755120	2539667	2540821	276222	277339	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC800.03	ash2	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.016648548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755121	2539667	2540001	276222	276545	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC1289.13c	ash2	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.389197121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755122	2539667	2542170	276222	278645	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC17G8.13c	ash2	mst2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.340247807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755123	2539667	2539706	276222	276259	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC16G5.13	ash2	ptf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.868917971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755124	2539667	2542283	276222	278751	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC27F1.08	ash2	pdt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.917823752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755125	2539667	2542806	276222	279254	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC1610.01	ash2	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.793525921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755126	2539667	2539354	276222	275920	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC4F11.03c	ash2	SPCC4F11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.061481301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755127	2539667	2538762	276222	275345	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC306.04c	ash2	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.726028472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755128	2539667	2539101	276222	275673	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC736.04c	ash2	gma12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.847888046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755129	2539667	2542516	276222	278974	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC2F7.04	ash2	pmc2	-	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.618405161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755130	2539667	2543619	276222	280033	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC4F10.04	ash2	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448356692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755131	2539667	2539555	276222	276116	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC4B3.08	ash2	lsg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452499959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755132	2539667	2540619	276222	277145	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC25H2.15	ash2	SPBC25H2.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9341169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755133	2539667	2542767	276222	279217	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC1565.07c	ash2	knd1	-	SPAC1565.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.903656475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755134	2539667	2541175	276222	277689	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC839.13c	ash2	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.402751854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755135	2539667	2541909	276222	278399	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC227.01c	ash2	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.477667116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755136	2539667	2540498	276222	277026	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC27.02c	ash2	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9215642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755137	2539667	2539925	276222	276469	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC16H5.13	ash2	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.285084901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755138	2539667	2540800	276222	277319	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC409.20c	ash2	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645683385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755139	2539667	2539246	276222	275816	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC18.13	ash2	SPCC18.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.406636228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755140	2539667	2540115	276222	276652	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC1778.02	ash2	rap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.561302455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755141	2539667	2541470	276222	277972	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAPYUG7.04c	ash2	rpb9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.817003315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755142	2539667	2542418	276222	278881	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC1805.07c	ash2	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.584730412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755143	2539667	2543437	276222	279857	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAPB1A10.14	ash2	pof15	-	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389899137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755144	2539667	2542826	276222	279273	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC13G6.09	ash2	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.166373818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755145	2539667	2539668	276222	276223	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC11B10.10c	ash2	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.38290891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755146	2539667	2541789	276222	278281	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC23H4.08	ash2	iwr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.37920475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755147	2539667	2540555	276222	277082	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBP16F5.02	ash2	mcs2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.342370967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755148	2539667	2540936	276222	277452	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC800.05c	ash2	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.93130666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755149	2539667	2543044	276222	279479	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC3C7.12	ash2	tip1	-	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.666434275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755150	2539667	2542386	276222	278850	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC1805.01c	ash2	ppk6	-	SPAPJ736.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.83641333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755151	2539667	2539205	276222	275775	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC4B3.15	ash2	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.376851111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755152	2539667	2539375	276222	275941	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC4G3.11	ash2	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.477081913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755153	2539667	2543380	276222	279802	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC4G9.16c	ash2	rpl901	-	rpl9-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935557649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755154	2539667	2539700	276222	276253	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC1685.15c	ash2	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.698644867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755155	2539667	2541806	276222	278297	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC4G8.13c	ash2	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.813447632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755156	2539667	2539875	276222	276421	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC16A3.12c	ash2	SPBC16A3.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.88193268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755157	2539667	2541627	276222	278123	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC1F5.08c	ash2	yam8	-	ehs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451660971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755158	2539667	2540122	276222	276659	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC1778.03c	ash2	SPBC1778.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.051980763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755159	2539667	3361512	276222	280588	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC3C7.01c	ash2	sac12	-	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.751171899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755160	2539667	2540787	276222	277306	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC1921.07c	ash2	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.664887019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755161	2539667	2540734	276222	277257	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC19G7.09	ash2	ulp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.682046308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755162	2542861	2541728	279307	278222	SPAC13G7.13c	SPAC20G4.03c	msa1	hri1	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1235832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755163	2542861	2542518	279307	278976	SPAC13G7.13c	SPAC1B3.16c	msa1	vht1	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.274996159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755164	2542861	2542390	279307	278854	SPAC13G7.13c	SPAC6F6.11c	msa1	SPAC6F6.11c	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.873543584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755165	2542861	2540913	279307	277429	SPAC13G7.13c	SPBC56F2.08c	msa1	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.117984344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755166	2542861	2540653	279307	277178	SPAC13G7.13c	SPBC215.07c	msa1	SPBC215.07c	SPAC6C3.01c	pdp2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.900718071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755167	2542861	2541117	279307	277632	SPAC13G7.13c	SPBC646.13	msa1	sds23	SPAC6C3.01c	moc1|psp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.202851344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755168	2542861	2543201	279307	279630	SPAC13G7.13c	SPAC3F10.15c	msa1	spo12	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.628792655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755169	2542861	2539420	279307	275985	SPAC13G7.13c	SPCC970.07c	msa1	raf2	SPAC6C3.01c	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.821858069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755170	2542861	2542677	279307	279130	SPAC13G7.13c	SPAC26F1.10c	msa1	pyp1	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392366234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755171	2542861	2543590	279307	280005	SPAC13G7.13c	SPAC4C5.03	msa1	SPAC4C5.03	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871327696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755172	2542861	2543111	279307	279543	SPAC13G7.13c	SPAC806.07	msa1	ndk1	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.937222876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755173	2542861	2541119	279307	277634	SPAC13G7.13c	SPBC651.11c	msa1	apm3	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382603468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755174	2542861	2540463	279307	276991	SPAC13G7.13c	SPBC2F12.15c	msa1	pfa3	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985534606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755175	2542861	2542969	279307	279409	SPAC13G7.13c	SPAC4G8.10	msa1	gos1	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.841257121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755176	2542861	2542277	279307	278746	SPAC13G7.13c	SPAC17A5.02c	msa1	dbr1	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992073019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755177	2542861	2539981	279307	276525	SPAC13G7.13c	SPBC1289.09	msa1	tim21	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449550793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755178	2542861	2542082	279307	278559	SPAC13G7.13c	SPAC29B12.10c	msa1	pgt1	SPAC6C3.01c	opt1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.998174713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755179	2542861	2542311	279307	278777	SPAC13G7.13c	SPAC16A10.05c	msa1	dad1	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455930692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755180	2542861	2541801	279307	278292	SPAC13G7.13c	SPAC2F7.08c	msa1	snf5	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.00706896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755181	2542861	2538770	279307	275353	SPAC13G7.13c	SPCC1753.02c	msa1	git3	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.19472161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755182	2542861	2540673	279307	277198	SPAC13G7.13c	SPBC1D7.03	msa1	mug80	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.932957978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755183	2542861	2540886	279307	277403	SPAC13G7.13c	SPBC4F6.10	msa1	vps901	SPAC6C3.01c	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.810392223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755184	2542861	2542921	279307	279362	SPAC13G7.13c	SPAC1093.01	msa1	ppr5	SPAC6C3.01c	SPAC12B10.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.26268012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755185	2542861	2542867	279307	279312	SPAC13G7.13c	SPAC343.16	msa1	lys2	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.443276985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755186	2542861	2541389	279307	277900	SPAC13G7.13c	SPBPB2B2.09c	msa1	SPBPB2B2.09c	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928185433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755187	2542861	2541708	279307	278203	SPAC13G7.13c	SPAC31A2.02	msa1	trm112	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039935842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755188	2542861	3361470	279307	280546	SPAC13G7.13c	SPAC3G9.01	msa1	nsk1	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.43717973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755189	2542861	2540882	279307	277399	SPAC13G7.13c	SPBC4F6.08c	msa1	mrpl39	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377555606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755190	2542861	2540533	279307	277061	SPAC13G7.13c	SPBC29A10.16c	msa1	SPBC29A10.16c	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979476805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755191	2542861	2539853	279307	276401	SPAC13G7.13c	SPBC1347.07	msa1	rex2	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.848509161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755192	2542861	2541713	279307	278208	SPAC13G7.13c	SPAC3A12.12	msa1	atp11	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.078386906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755193	2542861	2540706	279307	277229	SPAC13G7.13c	SPBC19C7.12c	msa1	omh1	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453738073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755194	2542861	2542327	279307	278793	SPAC13G7.13c	SPAC16C9.06c	msa1	upf1	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.806965179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755195	2542861	2540498	279307	277026	SPAC13G7.13c	SPBC27.02c	msa1	ask1	SPAC6C3.01c	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.554392052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755196	2542861	2542021	279307	278504	SPAC13G7.13c	SPAP14E8.02	msa1	tos4	SPAC6C3.01c	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8504939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755197	2542861	2541151	279307	277666	SPAC13G7.13c	SPBC713.03	msa1	SPBC713.03	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44942774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755198	2542861	2541238	279307	277752	SPAC13G7.13c	SPBC8E4.05c	msa1	SPBC8E4.05c	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453463683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755199	2542861	2540314	279307	276844	SPAC13G7.13c	SPBC2G5.03	msa1	ctu1	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.414489426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755200	2542861	2540067	279307	276605	SPAC13G7.13c	SPBC16H5.05c	msa1	cyp7	SPAC6C3.01c	cwf27	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.850928921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755201	2542861	2542094	279307	278571	SPAC13G7.13c	SPAC29B12.06c	msa1	rcd1	SPAC6C3.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.24952972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755202	2542861	2541260	279307	277774	SPAC13G7.13c	SPBC902.05c	msa1	idh2	SPAC6C3.01c	glu2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.070228911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755203	2542409	2542969	278873	279409	SPAC17G8.10c	SPAC4G8.10	dma1	gos1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.302720069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755204	2542409	2539388	278873	275953	SPAC17G8.10c	SPCC24B10.12	dma1	cgi121	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.944651946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755205	2542409	2539845	278873	276393	SPAC17G8.10c	SPBC12C2.02c	dma1	ste20	-	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842470049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755206	2542409	2542464	278873	278925	SPAC17G8.10c	SPAC1A6.09c	dma1	lag1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383516236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755207	2542409	2539484	278873	276047	SPAC17G8.10c	SPCC594.04c	dma1	SPCC594.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.926008677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755208	2542409	2539812	278873	276362	SPAC17G8.10c	SPBC1347.02	dma1	fkbp39	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.854857549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755209	2542409	2538962	278873	275536	SPAC17G8.10c	SPCC965.13	dma1	SPCC965.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813987676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755210	2542409	2541806	278873	278297	SPAC17G8.10c	SPAC4G8.13c	dma1	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.393148056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755211	2539161	2538852	275733	275433	SPCC63.05	SPCC4E9.01c	tap42	rec11	SPCC63.05	SPCC550.16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450586569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755212	2542032	2542577	278514	279033	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC19G12.15c	pnk1	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.557266858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755213	2542032	2541512	278514	278013	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC11E3.08c	pnk1	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.378278192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755214	2542032	2540913	278514	277429	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC56F2.08c	pnk1	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.061555303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755215	2542032	2542372	278514	278836	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC1F3.03	pnk1	SPAC1F3.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.059490652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755216	2542032	2541552	278514	278051	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC1142.08	pnk1	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.988220206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755217	2542032	2538896	278514	275474	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC584.11c	pnk1	SPCC584.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775104761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755218	2542032	2542502	278514	278960	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC139.06	pnk1	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570875558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755219	2542032	2543164	278514	279595	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC3G6.06c	pnk1	rad2	-	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.367611089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755220	2542032	2543434	278514	279854	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC8F11.02c	pnk1	dph3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.274123962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755221	2542032	2540686	278514	277211	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC21D10.10	pnk1	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.259325892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755222	2542032	2542701	278514	279154	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC26H5.05	pnk1	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38628482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755223	2542032	2541584	278514	278081	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAP32A8.02	pnk1	SPAP32A8.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.129581235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755224	2542032	2542103	278514	278579	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC31G5.11	pnk1	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.381991792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755225	2542032	2540975	278514	277491	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC354.12	pnk1	gpd3	-	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.41633414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755226	2542032	2542468	278514	278929	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC1D4.09c	pnk1	rtf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.086594178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755227	2542032	2538775	278514	275357	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC23B6.05c	pnk1	ssb3	-	rpa3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.019175434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755228	2542032	2539249	278514	275819	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC1450.05c	pnk1	rox3	-	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.375168024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755229	2542032	2540220	278514	276753	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC337.03	pnk1	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.234598427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755230	2542032	2541781	278514	278274	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC23G3.07c	pnk1	snf30	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.313755935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755231	2542032	2539117	278514	275689	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC74.06	pnk1	mak3	-	phk2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.985775414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755232	2542032	2543048	278514	279483	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC3F10.02c	pnk1	trk1	-	sptrk	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.906792694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755233	2542032	2539937	278514	276481	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC1539.08	pnk1	arf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.145027037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755234	2542032	2540727	278514	277250	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC1921.03c	pnk1	mex67	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773750698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755235	2542032	2542165	278514	278641	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC1782.08c	pnk1	rex3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.97966419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755236	2542032	2542969	278514	279409	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC4G8.10	pnk1	gos1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579229392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755237	2542032	2540595	278514	277121	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC21C3.02c	pnk1	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714582092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755238	2542032	2538927	278514	275503	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC1795.09	pnk1	yps1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.075293545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755239	2542032	2542640	278514	279094	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC9E9.12c	pnk1	ybt1	-	abc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57355022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755240	2542032	2541021	278514	277536	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC3B8.10c	pnk1	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.554098362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755241	2542032	2539310	278514	275877	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC285.17	pnk1	spp27	-	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574519942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755242	2542032	2542568	278514	279024	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC1952.02	pnk1	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.619375893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755243	2542032	2539960	278514	276504	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC15D4.15	pnk1	pho2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.81763239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755244	2542032	2542979	278514	279417	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAPJ760.02c	pnk1	abp1	-	app1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.31926516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755245	2542032	2542499	278514	278958	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC1F12.04c	pnk1	SPAC1F12.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319473673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755246	2542032	2541801	278514	278292	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC2F7.08c	pnk1	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.612788109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755247	2542032	2542513	278514	278971	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC1952.05	pnk1	gcn5	-	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.79185639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755248	2542032	3361491	278514	280567	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC1805.08	pnk1	dlc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.494385004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755249	2542032	2538706	278514	275290	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC338.08	pnk1	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.831798736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755250	2542032	2539733	278514	276285	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC16E9.12c	pnk1	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.191534499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755251	2542032	2540396	278514	276924	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC31F10.12	pnk1	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.822683808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755252	2542032	2540886	278514	277403	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC4F6.10	pnk1	vps901	-	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575520415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755253	2542032	2539999	278514	276543	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC1734.15	pnk1	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.922247222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755254	2542032	2541496	278514	277998	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC23D3.09	pnk1	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.048710399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755255	2542032	2541929	278514	278417	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC23C4.12	pnk1	hhp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.014110919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755256	2542032	2538890	278514	275468	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC1393.02c	pnk1	spt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.984156069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755257	2542032	2540086	278514	276624	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC16H5.12c	pnk1	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.375550863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755258	2542032	2539482	278514	276045	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC417.06c	pnk1	mug27	-	ppk35|slk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.165318878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755259	2542032	2540836	278514	277354	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC18H10.19	pnk1	vps38	-	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.253389136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755260	2542032	2541900	278514	278390	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC23H4.17c	pnk1	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567384719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755261	2542032	2540318	278514	276848	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC30B4.04c	pnk1	sol1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.003730664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755262	2542032	2539408	278514	275973	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC576.12c	pnk1	mhf2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.8181668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755263	2542032	2541142	278514	277657	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC725.04	pnk1	SPBC725.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701788083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755264	2542032	2542597	278514	279051	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAP8A3.07c	pnk1	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041656081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755265	2542032	2540533	278514	277061	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC29A10.16c	pnk1	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.502344277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755266	2542032	3361105	278514	280181	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC188.10c	pnk1	SPCC188.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579171273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755267	2542032	2540930	278514	277446	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC354.10	pnk1	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.934592654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755268	2542032	2543113	278514	279545	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC3F10.07c	pnk1	erf4	-	mug91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.50749398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755269	2542032	2539160	278514	275732	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC18.17c	pnk1	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32568826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755270	2542032	2540442	278514	276970	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC25B2.04c	pnk1	mtg1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875855626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755271	2542032	2543051	278514	279486	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC1071.08	pnk1	rpp203	-	rla6|rpp2-3|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576878244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755272	2542032	2542516	278514	278974	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC2F7.04	pnk1	pmc2	-	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.333216006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755273	2542032	2540498	278514	277026	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC27.02c	pnk1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980509207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755274	2542032	2539013	278514	275586	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC364.03	pnk1	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.987853011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755275	2542032	2541470	278514	277972	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAPYUG7.04c	pnk1	rpb9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388219513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755276	2542032	2540829	278514	277347	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC800.09	pnk1	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.215044086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755277	2542032	2542727	278514	279177	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC26A3.02	pnk1	myh1	-	myh	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441084354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755278	2542032	2540555	278514	277082	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBP16F5.02	pnk1	mcs2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922062866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755279	2542032	2543633	278514	280047	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC3H8.05c	pnk1	mms1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.712030956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755280	2542032	2539702	278514	276255	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC1604.12	pnk1	SPBC1604.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.349105012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755281	2542032	2539205	278514	275775	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC4B3.15	pnk1	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.627934097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755282	2542032	2539920	278514	276464	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC119.08	pnk1	pmk1	-	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.343836673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755283	2542032	2540140	278514	276677	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC16C6.08c	pnk1	qcr6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.629114964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755284	2542032	2541806	278514	278297	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC4G8.13c	pnk1	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.075613837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755285	2542032	2543327	278514	279750	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC1D4.06c	pnk1	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.448618575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755286	2542032	2538854	278514	275435	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCP1E11.05c	pnk1	are2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.480541816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755287	2542032	2542175	278514	278650	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC1F3.02c	pnk1	mkh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.644228443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755288	2542032	2539743	278514	276295	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC16A3.08c	pnk1	oga1	-	SPBC16A3.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578368003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755289	2542032	2538947	278514	275521	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC1682.12c	pnk1	ubp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.554758208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755290	2542032	2542890	278514	279334	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC13G6.14	pnk1	aps1	-	SPAC24B11.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383887823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755291	2542032	2542656	278514	279110	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC2E1P3.05c	pnk1	SPAC2E1P3.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.212646893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755292	2542032	2540309	278514	276839	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC21B10.13c	pnk1	yox1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.12272703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755293	2542032	2541062	278514	277577	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC660.11	pnk1	tcg1	-	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.974317374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755294	2542032	2543463	278514	279883	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAPB21F2.03	pnk1	slx9	-	SPAPB21F2.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.675098706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755295	2542032	2540787	278514	277306	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC1921.07c	pnk1	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.012941983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755296	2542032	2540649	278514	277174	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC19F8.08	pnk1	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.613788238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755297	2540016	2542207	276560	278682	SPBC1773.09c	SPAC17H9.10c	mug184	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514024692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755298	2540016	2541776	276560	278270	SPBC1773.09c	SPAC23H3.05c	mug184	swd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.85258749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755299	2540016	2541545	276560	278045	SPBC1773.09c	SPAC22F8.07c	mug184	rtf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041156003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755300	2539676	2542710	276231	279163	SPBC1347.12	SPAC750.08c	arp1	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.468343341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755301	2542655	2540664	279109	277189	SPAC3A11.14c	SPBC215.02	pkl1	bob1	SPAC3H5.03c|klp1	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.437438512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755302	2542655	2542311	279109	278777	SPAC3A11.14c	SPAC16A10.05c	pkl1	dad1	SPAC3H5.03c|klp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.856952647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755303	2542655	2543378	279109	279800	SPAC3A11.14c	SPAC3H8.07c	pkl1	pac10	SPAC3H5.03c|klp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.987201337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755304	3361391	2540060	280467	276598	SPAC13G6.01c	SPBC106.01	rad8	mph1	SPAC5H10.14c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.671194318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755305	3361391	2543529	280467	279947	SPAC13G6.01c	SPAC4C5.02c	rad8	ryh1	SPAC5H10.14c	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.471586489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755306	3361391	2540956	280467	277472	SPAC13G6.01c	SPBC409.06	rad8	uch2	SPAC5H10.14c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.840141552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755307	3361391	2543685	280467	280099	SPAC13G6.01c	SPAC3C7.03c	rad8	rad55	SPAC5H10.14c	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.03165466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755308	3361391	2542791	280467	279240	SPAC13G6.01c	SPAC167.04	rad8	pam17	SPAC5H10.14c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.332026826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755309	3361391	2542036	280467	278518	SPAC13G6.01c	SPAC23A1.19c	rad8	hrq1	SPAC5H10.14c	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.345854933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755310	3361391	2538738	280467	275321	SPAC13G6.01c	SPCC320.14	rad8	sry1	SPAC5H10.14c	SPCC320.14|SPCC330.15c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871147378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755311	3361391	2542484	280467	278944	SPAC13G6.01c	SPAC1A6.07	rad8	sle1	SPAC5H10.14c	SPAC1A6.07|seg1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380157961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755312	3361391	2540348	280467	276877	SPAC13G6.01c	SPBC29A10.05	rad8	exo1	SPAC5H10.14c	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.686020709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755313	3361391	2542971	280467	279410	SPAC13G6.01c	SPAC105.02c	rad8	SPAC105.02c	SPAC5H10.14c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452911501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755314	3361391	2539073	280467	275645	SPAC13G6.01c	SPCC1322.02	rad8	pxd1	SPAC5H10.14c	SPCC1322.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.939777078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755315	3361391	2542873	280467	279318	SPAC13G6.01c	SPAC9G1.02	rad8	wis4	SPAC5H10.14c	wak1|wik1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.686929438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755316	3361391	2542007	280467	278490	SPAC13G6.01c	SPAC20H4.07	rad8	rad57	SPAC5H10.14c	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.407380133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755317	3361391	2541410	280467	277918	SPAC13G6.01c	SPBPB2B2.17c	rad8	SPBPB2B2.17c	SPAC5H10.14c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.251573484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755318	3361391	2542597	280467	279051	SPAC13G6.01c	SPAP8A3.07c	rad8	SPAP8A3.07c	SPAC5H10.14c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038857162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755319	3361391	2540629	280467	277155	SPAC13G6.01c	SPBC21D10.09c	rad8	rkr1	SPAC5H10.14c	SPBC21D10.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149479526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755320	3361391	2543090	280467	279523	SPAC13G6.01c	SPBC1348.01	rad8	SPBC1348.01	SPAC5H10.14c	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.324290641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755321	3361391	2539001	280467	275575	SPAC13G6.01c	SPCC1494.08c	rad8	SPCC1494.08c	SPAC5H10.14c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.195979174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755322	2542528	2541013	278986	277528	SPAC1B3.08	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC1B3.08	far10	-	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.610924977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755323	2542528	2542689	278986	279142	SPAC1B3.08	SPAC29B12.04	SPAC1B3.08	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.054227528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755324	2542528	2540595	278986	277121	SPAC1B3.08	SPBC21C3.02c	SPAC1B3.08	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.324887027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755325	2542528	2538906	278986	275483	SPAC1B3.08	SPCC1259.03	SPAC1B3.08	rpa12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.920831152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755326	2542528	2542311	278986	278777	SPAC1B3.08	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC1B3.08	dad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.596108877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755327	2542528	2542469	278986	278930	SPAC1B3.08	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC1B3.08	erg5	-	cyp61	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.167974612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755328	2542528	2541496	278986	277998	SPAC1B3.08	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC1B3.08	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.367879287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755329	2542528	2539974	278986	276518	SPAC1B3.08	SPBC32H8.07	SPAC1B3.08	git5	-	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037623607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755330	2542528	2539481	278986	276044	SPAC1B3.08	SPCC622.16c	SPAC1B3.08	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699755026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755331	2542528	5802861	278986	857999	SPAC1B3.08	SPAC1D4.01	SPAC1B3.08	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647753284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755332	2542528	2542329	278986	278795	SPAC1B3.08	SPAC9G1.10c	SPAC1B3.08	SPAC9G1.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.165720103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755333	2542528	2542806	278986	279254	SPAC1B3.08	SPAC1610.01	SPAC1B3.08	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.252133765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755334	2542528	2538762	278986	275345	SPAC1B3.08	SPCC306.04c	SPAC1B3.08	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.047925155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755335	2542528	2543304	278986	279728	SPAC1B3.08	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1B3.08	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.34960745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755336	2542528	2543219	278986	279647	SPAC1B3.08	SPAC56F8.09	SPAC1B3.08	rrp8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.464318343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755337	2542528	2543582	278986	279997	SPAC1B3.08	SPAC4H3.06	SPAC1B3.08	SPAC4H3.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145752547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755338	2542528	2542059	278986	278537	SPAC1B3.08	SPAC328.06	SPAC1B3.08	ubp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.069137876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755339	2542528	2543277	278986	279705	SPAC1B3.08	SPAC1002.03c	SPAC1B3.08	gls2	-	gls2alpha	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.903451346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755340	2541214	2540068	277728	276606	SPBC839.07	SPBC1734.12c	ibp1	alg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.518212044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755341	2541214	2541488	277728	277990	SPBC839.07	SPAC227.17c	ibp1	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877352933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755342	2541214	2541337	277728	277848	SPBC839.07	SPBP35G2.13c	ibp1	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392497541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755343	2541214	2540498	277728	277026	SPBC839.07	SPBC27.02c	ibp1	ask1	-	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.158031268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755344	2541214	2543304	277728	279728	SPBC839.07	SPAC6B12.12	ibp1	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.559869723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755345	2541214	2543337	277728	279760	SPBC839.07	SPAC959.08	ibp1	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712581193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755346	2542831	2539845	279278	276393	SPAC20H4.08	SPBC12C2.02c	whi2	ste20	SPAC20H4.08|SPAC145.02	ste16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205187547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755347	2542831	2542753	279278	279203	SPAC20H4.08	SPAC1687.09	whi2	SPAC1687.09	SPAC20H4.08|SPAC145.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.783341895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755348	2542831	2540270	279278	276801	SPAC20H4.08	SPBC2G2.02	whi2	syj1	SPAC20H4.08|SPAC145.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.132811894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755349	2539995	2542207	276539	278682	SPBC1105.09	SPAC17H9.10c	ubc15	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.096090081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755350	2539995	2543529	276539	279947	SPBC1105.09	SPAC4C5.02c	ubc15	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.878323209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755351	2539995	2541426	276539	277931	SPBC1105.09	SPAC227.06	ubc15	SPAC227.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389403615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755352	2539995	3361561	276539	280637	SPBC1105.09	SPAC11E3.01c	ubc15	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193510221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755353	2539995	2539201	276539	275772	SPBC1105.09	SPCC188.09c	ubc15	pfl4	-	SPCC188.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.053072343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755354	2539995	2540313	276539	276843	SPBC1105.09	SPBC337.04	ubc15	ppk27	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.125770133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755355	2539995	2540220	276539	276753	SPBC1105.09	SPBC337.03	ubc15	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.787782235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755356	2539995	3361385	276539	280461	SPBC1105.09	SPAC1639.02c	ubc15	trk2	-	SPAC1F5.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816633602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755357	2539995	2538906	276539	275483	SPBC1105.09	SPCC1259.03	ubc15	rpa12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.072860737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755358	2539995	2542791	276539	279240	SPBC1105.09	SPAC167.04	ubc15	pam17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.333704859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755359	2539995	2540892	276539	277408	SPBC1105.09	SPBC530.01	ubc15	gyp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816597944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755360	2539995	2543445	276539	279865	SPBC1105.09	SPAC4F10.13c	ubc15	mpd2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928511191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755361	2539995	2540886	276539	277403	SPBC1105.09	SPBC4F6.10	ubc15	vps901	-	vps9a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090999175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755362	2539995	2542597	276539	279051	SPBC1105.09	SPAP8A3.07c	ubc15	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875411946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755363	2539995	2539812	276539	276362	SPBC1105.09	SPBC1347.02	ubc15	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328988428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755364	2539995	2538844	276539	275425	SPBC1105.09	SPCC1183.09c	ubc15	pmp31	-	mug75	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875000621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755365	2539995	2539925	276539	276469	SPBC1105.09	SPBC16H5.13	ubc15	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.565543722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755366	2539995	2542306	276539	278773	SPBC1105.09	SPAC29A4.11	ubc15	rga3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.007351474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755367	2539995	2539013	276539	275586	SPBC1105.09	SPCC364.03	ubc15	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328269802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755368	2539995	2540629	276539	277155	SPBC1105.09	SPBC21D10.09c	ubc15	rkr1	-	SPBC21D10.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81999128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755369	2539995	2542111	276539	278587	SPBC1105.09	SPAC1687.14c	ubc15	SPAC1687.14c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.940907229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755370	2542052	2542268	278531	278737	SPAC823.15	SPAC17A5.07c	ppa1	ulp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.765290712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755371	2542052	2539898	278531	276444	SPAC823.15	SPBC12D12.07c	ppa1	trx2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.701009025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755372	2542052	2540886	278531	277403	SPAC823.15	SPBC4F6.10	ppa1	vps901	-	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.774626861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755373	2543317	2541343	279741	277854	SPAC823.14	SPBPB2B2.19c	ptf1	SPBPB2B2.19c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771999413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755374	2543317	2540686	279741	277211	SPAC823.14	SPBC21D10.10	ptf1	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.346513251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755375	2543317	2538922	279741	275499	SPAC823.14	SPCC16C4.10	ptf1	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.923311938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755376	2543317	2538801	279741	275382	SPAC823.14	SPCC285.13c	ptf1	nup60	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.841808073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755377	2543317	2543573	279741	279988	SPAC823.14	SPAC869.11	ptf1	cat1	-	SPAC922.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189753296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755378	2543317	2542177	279741	278652	SPAC823.14	SPAC17H9.08	ptf1	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330855891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755379	2543317	2541093	279741	277608	SPAC823.14	SPBC646.08c	ptf1	SPBC646.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640590278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755380	2543317	2539733	279741	276285	SPAC823.14	SPBC16E9.12c	ptf1	pab2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.888403816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755381	2543317	2539898	279741	276444	SPAC823.14	SPBC12D12.07c	ptf1	trx2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.610376255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755382	2543317	2540886	279741	277403	SPAC823.14	SPBC4F6.10	ptf1	vps901	-	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452610448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755383	2543317	2540997	279741	277513	SPAC823.14	SPBC3H7.06c	ptf1	pof9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.718724226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755384	2543317	2540836	279741	277354	SPAC823.14	SPBC18H10.19	ptf1	vps38	-	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390164852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755385	2543317	2539101	279741	275673	SPAC823.14	SPCC736.04c	ptf1	gma12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041271381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755386	2543317	2543372	279741	279794	SPAC823.14	SPAPB1A10.09	ptf1	ase1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.118352377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755387	2542007	2542382	278490	278846	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC6G10.06	rad57	SPAC6G10.06	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.406445529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755388	2542007	2543152	278490	279584	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC869.03c	rad57	SPAC869.03c	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.460472009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755389	2542007	2543655	278490	280069	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC9.08c	rad57	SPAC9.08c	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711526815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755390	2542007	2541912	278490	278402	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC222.16c	rad57	csn3	rhp57|SPAC145.01	SPAC821.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.980523515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755391	2542007	2543414	278490	279836	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC630.10	rad57	SPAC630.10	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.896404655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755392	2542007	2542127	278490	278603	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC1952.12c	rad57	csn71	rhp57|SPAC145.01	csn7|csn7a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.075428756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755393	2542007	2543064	278490	279497	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC3G6.01	rad57	hrp3	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.978966616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755394	2542007	2542643	278490	279097	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC2C4.07c	rad57	dis32	rhp57|SPAC145.01	SPAC2C4.07c|dis3L2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.831735189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755395	2542007	2540863	278490	277380	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC56F2.03	rad57	SPBC56F2.03	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.323159765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755396	2542007	2541135	278490	277650	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC839.03c	rad57	SPBC839.03c	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.174855635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755397	2542007	2542237	278490	278709	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC19E9.02	rad57	fin1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.329762463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755398	2542007	2542224	278490	278697	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC19G12.03	rad57	cda1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.061778682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755399	2542007	2541374	278490	277885	SPAC20H4.07	SPBPB10D8.06c	rad57	SPBPB10D8.06c	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.11415185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755400	2542007	2540139	278490	276676	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC1773.06c	rad57	adh8	rhp57|SPAC145.01	SPBC1773.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935262036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755401	2542007	2543164	278490	279595	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC3G6.06c	rad57	rad2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.745160645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755402	2542007	2542071	278490	278548	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC26H5.03	rad57	pcf2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	cac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.693381601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755403	2542007	2542103	278490	278579	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC31G5.11	rad57	pac2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.510062768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755404	2542007	2540455	278490	276983	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC215.05	rad57	gpd1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.605672539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755405	2542007	2540664	278490	277189	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC215.02	rad57	bob1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035434931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755406	2542007	2540375	278490	276904	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC2G2.06c	rad57	apl1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384439638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755407	2542007	3361570	278490	280646	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC750.01	rad57	SPAC750.01	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.416872844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755408	2542007	2540975	278490	277491	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC354.12	rad57	gpd3	rhp57|SPAC145.01	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.628430589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755409	2542007	2539420	278490	275985	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC970.07c	rad57	raf2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.134556386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755410	2542007	2541208	278490	277722	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC887.04c	rad57	lub1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.561772434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755411	2542007	2539443	278490	276006	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC736.02	rad57	SPCC736.02	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386574785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755412	2542007	2541058	278490	277573	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC3H7.09	rad57	erf2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	mug142	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865976515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755413	2542007	2539913	278490	276457	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC11G11.03	rad57	mrt4	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.223691633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755414	2542007	2538801	278490	275382	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC285.13c	rad57	nup60	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.142281712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755415	2542007	2540945	278490	277461	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC342.06c	rad57	rtt109	rhp57|SPAC145.01	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.43627518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755416	2542007	2539576	278490	276136	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC794.01c	rad57	zwf2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	SPCC794.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.271881617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755417	2542007	2543111	278490	279543	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC806.07	rad57	ndk1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196202495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755418	2542007	2540220	278490	276753	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC337.03	rad57	rhn1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	SPBC337.03|iss4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.073320395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755419	2542007	2539937	278490	276481	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC1539.08	rad57	arf6	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.164789574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755420	2542007	2541045	278490	277560	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC543.03c	rad57	pku80	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.298630885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755421	2542007	2539302	278490	275870	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC126.09	rad57	zip2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	SPCC126.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.317597825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755422	2542007	2542022	278490	278505	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC23A1.03	rad57	apt1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.336730713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755423	2542007	2542318	278490	278784	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC16C9.05	rad57	cph1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2578869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755424	2542007	2541643	278490	278139	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC14C4.13	rad57	rad17	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.064557027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755425	2542007	2541580	278490	278077	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC1687.05	rad57	pli1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.204449262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755426	2542007	2543296	278490	279721	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC9E9.03	rad57	leu2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871357226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755427	2542007	2541522	278490	278023	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC23E2.01	rad57	fep1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700405457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755428	2542007	2539352	278490	275918	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC188.07	rad57	ccq1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.613830318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755429	2542007	2539100	278490	275672	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC330.12c	rad57	sdh3	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.56677463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755430	2542007	2538906	278490	275483	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC1259.03	rad57	rpa12	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.524407042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755431	2542007	2539478	278490	276041	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC550.07	rad57	SPCC550.07	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.825926736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755432	2542007	2540825	278490	277343	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC428.08c	rad57	clr4	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.30198169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755433	2542007	2542558	278490	279014	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC1952.07	rad57	rad1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.565489507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755434	2542007	2540319	278490	276849	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC30D10.16	rad57	pha2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574604795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755435	2542007	2541021	278490	277536	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC3B8.10c	rad57	nem1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.845581379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755436	2542007	3361391	278490	280467	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC13G6.01c	rad57	rad8	rhp57|SPAC145.01	SPAC5H10.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.407380133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755437	2542007	2539310	278490	275877	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC285.17	rad57	spp27	rhp57|SPAC145.01	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.207232865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755438	2542007	2542554	278490	279011	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC1952.03	rad57	otu2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.69207737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755439	2542007	2539960	278490	276504	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC15D4.15	rad57	pho2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.813518046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755440	2542007	2542036	278490	278518	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC23A1.19c	rad57	hrq1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.266073804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755441	2542007	2539467	278490	276030	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC417.07c	rad57	mto1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.337168512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755442	2542007	2539051	278490	275624	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC1183.11	rad57	msy1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.513473472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755443	2542007	2542950	278490	279390	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC12B10.03	rad57	bun62	rhp57|SPAC145.01	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.972432535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755444	2542007	2542646	278490	279100	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC11H11.05c	rad57	fta6	rhp57|SPAC145.01	sma6	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.117594162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755445	2542007	2538770	278490	275353	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC1753.02c	rad57	git3	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983850724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755446	2542007	2540647	278490	277172	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC18H10.07	rad57	SPBC18H10.07	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865769794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755447	2542007	2542776	278490	279225	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC167.01	rad57	ire1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	ppk4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.325277731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755448	2542007	2540348	278490	276877	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC29A10.05	rad57	exo1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.988284603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755449	2542007	2541892	278490	278382	SPAC20H4.07	SPAP27G11.02	rad57	SPAP27G11.02	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.3185015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755450	2542007	2539990	278490	276534	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC1289.14	rad57	SPBC1289.14	rhp57|SPAC145.01	SPBC8E4.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505826152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755451	2542007	2542699	278490	279152	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC5H10.07	rad57	SPAC5H10.07	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.84257822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755452	2542007	2541543	278490	278043	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC5H10.04	rad57	SPAC5H10.04	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.678742609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755453	2542007	2541578	278490	278075	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC25B8.05	rad57	deg1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	SPAC25B8.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389515014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755454	2542007	2543510	278490	279928	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC30D11.07	rad57	nth1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.561508271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755455	2542007	2539484	278490	276047	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC594.04c	rad57	SPCC594.04c	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.198579952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755456	2542007	2539999	278490	276543	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC1734.15	rad57	rsc4	rhp57|SPAC145.01	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.853316024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755457	2542007	2542925	278490	279366	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC11E3.04c	rad57	ubc13	rhp57|SPAC145.01	spu13|sst5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.466201838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755458	2542007	2543358	278490	279780	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC688.10	rad57	rev3	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.213198474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755459	2542007	2540452	278490	276980	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC2A9.11c	rad57	iss9	rhp57|SPAC145.01	SPBC2A9.11c|SPBC2D10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.91300283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755460	2542007	2538994	278490	275568	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC553.01c	rad57	dbl2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.718769968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755461	2542007	2538852	278490	275433	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC4E9.01c	rad57	rec11	rhp57|SPAC145.01	SPCC550.16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.867725914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755462	2542007	2541704	278490	278199	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC1250.04c	rad57	atl1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.707877511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755463	2542007	2542946	278490	279386	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC6F12.03c	rad57	fsv1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.875684628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755464	2542007	2540751	278490	277273	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC20F10.10	rad57	psl1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.588983021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755465	2542007	2538880	278490	275459	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC1393.09c	rad57	SPCC1393.09c	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.123474785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755466	2542007	2540107	278490	276644	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC106.08c	rad57	mug2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	B13958-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.025840611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755467	2542007	2540077	278490	276615	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC17D11.04c	rad57	nto1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.128948605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755468	2542007	2539958	278490	276502	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC1718.07c	rad57	zfs1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	moc4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.402748048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755469	2542007	2540374	278490	276903	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC31F10.02	rad57	SPBC31F10.02	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.26227975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755470	2542007	2542056	278490	278535	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC6G9.14	rad57	SPAC6G9.14	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448513549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755471	2542007	2539715	278490	276268	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC1778.09	rad57	SPBC1778.09	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.924400121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755472	2542007	2539043	278490	275616	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC1235.08c	rad57	pdh1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.835545163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755473	2542007	2538828	278490	275409	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC1020.05	rad57	SPCC1020.05	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.900395308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755474	2542007	2541266	278490	277780	SPAC20H4.07	SPBP16F5.05c	rad57	yar1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	SPBP16F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818783812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755475	2542007	2540844	278490	277361	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC1921.04c	rad57	SPBC1921.04c	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097465527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755476	2542007	2539059	278490	275632	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC737.06c	rad57	SPCC737.06c	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930049739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755477	2542007	2540882	278490	277399	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC4F6.08c	rad57	mrpl39	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509024964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755478	2542007	2541614	278490	278111	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC29A4.20	rad57	elp3	rhp57|SPAC145.01	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.475115039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755479	2542007	2541565	278490	278063	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC1250.03	rad57	ubc14	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.955179544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755480	2542007	2542255	278490	278725	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC57A7.08	rad57	pzh1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.524935972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755481	2542007	2541746	278490	278240	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC20G4.04c	rad57	hus1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.2166882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755482	2542007	2539812	278490	276362	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC1347.02	rad57	fkbp39	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.210909015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755483	2542007	2540930	278490	277446	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC354.10	rad57	def1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323332224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755484	2542007	2538848	278490	275429	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC613.12c	rad57	raf1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.367133498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755485	2542007	2541713	278490	278208	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC3A12.12	rad57	atp11	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.816487643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755486	2542007	2540821	278490	277339	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC800.03	rad57	clr3	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.125435425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755487	2542007	2542198	278490	278673	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC6F12.09	rad57	rdp1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.978324264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755488	2542007	2539686	278490	276241	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC1734.06	rad57	rhp18	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.886705813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755489	2542007	2539160	278490	275732	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC18.17c	rad57	SPCC18.17c	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639268409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755490	2542007	2539748	278490	276300	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC11C11.01	rad57	SPBC11C11.01	rhp57|SPAC145.01	SPBC17D1.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634218522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755491	2542007	2541156	278490	277671	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC685.07c	rad57	rpl2701	rhp57|SPAC145.01	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.160877074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755492	2542007	2540619	278490	277145	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC25H2.15	rad57	SPBC25H2.15	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.114046334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755493	2542007	2541175	278490	277689	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC839.13c	rad57	rpl1601	rhp57|SPAC145.01	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390238122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755494	2542007	2540498	278490	277026	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC27.02c	rad57	ask1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.86009749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755495	2542007	2541372	278490	277883	SPAC20H4.07	SPBP8B7.28c	rad57	stc1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868285825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755496	2542007	2543662	278490	280076	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC9.07c	rad57	SPAC9.07c	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.157632655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755497	2542007	2540115	278490	276652	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC1778.02	rad57	rap1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.572364491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755498	2542007	2542458	278490	278919	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC30.02c	rad57	SPAC30.02c	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.617819011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755499	2542007	2540346	278490	276875	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC2F12.03c	rad57	ebs1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.840502343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755500	2542007	2540699	278490	277223	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC800.08	rad57	gcd10	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.38170442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755501	2542007	2540829	278490	277347	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC800.09	rad57	sum2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.28444173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755502	2542007	2540164	278490	276699	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC1683.03c	rad57	SPBC1683.03c	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.192812821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755503	2542007	2540677	278490	277202	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC21B10.03c	rad57	ath1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.742261244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755504	2542007	2543091	278490	279524	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC12G12.15	rad57	sif3	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331120043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755505	2542007	2540928	278490	277444	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC3E7.10	rad57	fma1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.632702737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755506	2542007	2540992	278490	277508	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC342.05	rad57	crb2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	rhp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.455474582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755507	2542007	2540568	278490	277095	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC28F2.08c	rad57	SPBC28F2.08c	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.041048937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755508	2542007	2540927	278490	277443	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC365.06	rad57	pmt3	rhp57|SPAC145.01	smt3|ubl2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.811084339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755509	2542007	2540936	278490	277452	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC800.05c	rad57	atb2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.699237881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755510	2542007	2539545	278490	276106	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC4B3.12	rad57	set9	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.691865117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755511	2542007	3361410	278490	280486	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC1527.01	rad57	mok11	rhp57|SPAC145.01	SPAC23D3.15	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.745586113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755512	2542007	2538861	278490	275441	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC1620.11	rad57	nup97	rhp57|SPAC145.01	mug87	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.853396495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755513	2542007	2541806	278490	278297	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC4G8.13c	rad57	prz1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503566685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755514	2542007	2542159	278490	278635	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC1834.09	rad57	mug51	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.358464959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755515	2542007	2543446	278490	279866	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC4F8.10c	rad57	stg1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38990926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755516	2542007	2542566	278490	279022	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC8C9.12c	rad57	SPAC8C9.12c	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.145507831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755517	2542007	2540360	278490	276889	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC2G5.01	rad57	SPBC2G5.01	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.497094567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755518	2542007	2540481	278490	277009	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC2D10.12	rad57	rhp23	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.699008079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755519	2542007	2539588	278490	276146	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC962.04	rad57	rps1201	rhp57|SPAC145.01	rps12|rps12-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.893684264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755520	2542007	2541502	278490	278004	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC23D3.04c	rad57	gpd2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568605749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755521	2542007	2538947	278490	275521	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC1682.12c	rad57	ubp16	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091173243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755522	2542007	2540859	278490	277376	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC4C3.09	rad57	SPBC4C3.09	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570126857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755523	2542007	3361295	278490	280371	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC1921.01c	rad57	rpl35b	rhp57|SPAC145.01	rpl37|rpl37-1|rpl3701|SPBC29C10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.240606339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755524	2542007	2543624	278490	280038	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC4D7.06c	rad57	SPAC4D7.06c	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.948849103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755525	2542007	2542073	278490	278550	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC26F1.01	rad57	sec74	rhp57|SPAC145.01	SPAPJ691.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871320748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755526	2542007	2540208	278490	276741	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC9B6.03	rad57	SPBC9B6.03	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983589483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755527	2542007	2539494	278490	276057	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC4G3.08	rad57	psk1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709763066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755528	2542007	2541893	278490	278383	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC23H4.13c	rad57	SPAC23H4.13c	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329959215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755529	2542007	2540649	278490	277174	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC19F8.08	rad57	rps401	rhp57|SPAC145.01	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.084422622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755530	2542007	2540736	278490	277259	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC19F8.02	rad57	SPBC19F8.02	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.982800631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755531	2540997	2539147	277513	275719	SPBC3H7.06c	SPCC622.12c	pof9	gdh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.93208839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755532	2540997	2538796	277513	275377	SPBC3H7.06c	SPCC63.06	pof9	SPCC63.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6364138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755533	2540997	2543317	277513	279741	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC823.14	pof9	ptf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.718724226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755534	2540997	2543529	277513	279947	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC4C5.02c	pof9	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509443099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755535	2540997	2542066	277513	278543	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC227.05	pof9	SPAC227.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.940884257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755536	2540997	2539855	277513	276403	SPBC3H7.06c	SPBC14F5.07	pof9	doa10	-	ssm4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.986573069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755537	2540997	2542293	277513	278761	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC17G8.14c	pof9	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.304419907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755538	2540997	2540410	277513	276938	SPBC3H7.06c	SPBC2D10.04	pof9	SPBC2D10.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.195936309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755539	2540997	2540999	277513	277515	SPBC3H7.06c	SPBC4B4.04	pof9	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.305048054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755540	2540997	2542273	277513	278742	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC17H9.13c	pof9	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.008220517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755541	2540997	2540692	277513	277217	SPBC3H7.06c	SPBC800.07c	pof9	tsf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.36314391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755542	2540997	2540929	277513	277445	SPBC3H7.06c	SPBC354.03	pof9	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440776873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755543	2540997	3361385	277513	280461	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC1639.02c	pof9	trk2	-	SPAC1F5.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.128847439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755544	2540997	2542182	277513	278657	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC19B12.08	pof9	atg4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.814384136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755545	2540997	2541346	277513	277857	SPBC3H7.06c	SPBP8B7.08c	pof9	ppm1	-	SPBP8B7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512515722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755546	2540997	2539792	277513	276342	SPBC3H7.06c	SPBC1271.14	pof9	SPBC1271.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.493620065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755547	2540997	2543584	277513	279999	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAPB1E7.11c	pof9	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.984012891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755548	2540997	2543319	277513	279743	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC6B12.09	pof9	trm10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.814928707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755549	2540997	2538906	277513	275483	SPBC3H7.06c	SPCC1259.03	pof9	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.165199489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755550	2540997	2542558	277513	279014	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC1952.07	pof9	rad1	-	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703947594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755551	2540997	2540964	277513	277480	SPBC3H7.06c	SPBC365.16	pof9	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992716701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755552	2540997	2542311	277513	278777	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC16A10.05c	pof9	dad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.617876993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755553	2540997	2543514	277513	279932	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC4D7.03	pof9	pop2	-	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.304233566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755554	2540997	2541801	277513	278292	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC2F7.08c	pof9	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.474642643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755555	2540997	2541776	277513	278270	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC23H3.05c	pof9	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.521961436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755556	2540997	2543593	277513	280008	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC4G9.10	pof9	arg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.998426922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755557	2540997	2540352	277513	276881	SPBC3H7.06c	SPBC215.03c	pof9	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.578562521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755558	2540997	2543638	277513	280052	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC3H8.09c	pof9	nab3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.271915291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755559	2540997	2542168	277513	278643	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC17A5.16	pof9	ftp105	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868466185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755560	2540997	2541496	277513	277998	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC23D3.09	pof9	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.031138023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755561	2540997	2541183	277513	277697	SPBC3H7.06c	SPBC725.14	pof9	arg6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.107100937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755562	2540997	2541532	277513	278032	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC2C4.15c	pof9	ubx2	-	ucp13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322384421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755563	2540997	2543406	277513	279828	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC9.12c	pof9	atp12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867289159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755564	2540997	2542126	277513	278602	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC1B3.05	pof9	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.93021623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755565	2540997	2538774	277513	275356	SPBC3H7.06c	SPCC162.06c	pof9	SPCC162.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579060973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755566	2540997	2542946	277513	279386	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC6F12.03c	pof9	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570032298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755567	2540997	2539815	277513	276365	SPBC3H7.06c	SPBC1105.02c	pof9	lys4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.834439493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755568	2540997	2541900	277513	278390	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC23H4.17c	pof9	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.22270744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755569	2540997	2542867	277513	279312	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC343.16	pof9	lys2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.632051588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755570	2540997	2539368	277513	275934	SPBC3H7.06c	SPCC16A11.07	pof9	coq10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924156939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755571	2540997	2539317	277513	275883	SPBC3H7.06c	SPCC16A11.08	pof9	atg20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632165272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755572	2540997	2541112	277513	277627	SPBC3H7.06c	SPBC725.07	pof9	pex5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504794232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755573	2540997	2540342	277513	276871	SPBC3H7.06c	SPBC2G2.01c	pof9	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815903158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755574	2540997	2539402	277513	275967	SPBC3H7.06c	SPCC613.03	pof9	SPCC613.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.93309354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755575	2540997	2542597	277513	279051	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAP8A3.07c	pof9	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.055828039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755576	2540997	2541337	277513	277848	SPBC3H7.06c	SPBP35G2.13c	pof9	swc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.9893733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755577	2540997	2541963	277513	278449	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC21E11.04	pof9	aca1	-	ppr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453976262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755578	2540997	2543391	277513	279813	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC4G9.09c	pof9	arg11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.132262204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755579	2540997	2542883	277513	279328	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC1486.04c	pof9	alm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575933876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755580	2540997	2543304	277513	279728	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC6B12.12	pof9	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.38807111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755581	2540997	2540531	277513	277059	SPBC3H7.06c	SPBC23E6.08	pof9	sat1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.740322987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755582	2540997	2543192	277513	279621	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC343.18	pof9	rfp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.664054935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755583	2540997	2540829	277513	277347	SPBC3H7.06c	SPBC800.09	pof9	sum2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.209792709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755584	2540997	2539729	277513	276281	SPBC3H7.06c	SPBC11B10.07c	pof9	ivn1	-	pi004|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.80680786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755585	2540997	2542250	277513	278720	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC17D4.03c	pof9	cis4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.341954214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755586	2540997	2539928	277513	276472	SPBC3H7.06c	SPBC1604.08c	pof9	imp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.38371795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755587	2540997	2540551	277513	277078	SPBC3H7.06c	SPBC23E6.01c	pof9	cxr1	-	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.892476679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755588	2540997	2538840	277513	275421	SPBC3H7.06c	SPCC736.07c	pof9	SPCC736.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324324222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755589	2540997	2539253	277513	275823	SPBC3H7.06c	SPCC1827.03c	pof9	SPCC1827.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865608752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755590	2540997	2539014	277513	275587	SPBC3H7.06c	SPCC18B5.05c	pof9	SPCC18B5.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.593810369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755591	2540997	2541050	277513	277565	SPBC3H7.06c	SPBC428.05c	pof9	arg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.118675235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755592	2540997	2543374	277513	279796	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAPB1A10.08	pof9	SPAPB1A10.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865205552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755593	2540997	2542609	277513	279063	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC31G5.04	pof9	lys12	-	SPAC31G5.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.325349324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755594	2540430	2538806	276958	275387	SPBC25B2.01	SPCC1840.09	SPBC25B2.01	SPCC1840.09	SPBC2G5.08	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571847821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755595	2540430	2542816	276958	279263	SPBC25B2.01	SPAC4G8.11c	SPBC25B2.01	atp10	SPBC2G5.08	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.503900229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755596	2540430	2541026	276958	277541	SPBC25B2.01	SPBC337.09	SPBC25B2.01	erg28	SPBC2G5.08	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.566160238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755597	2540430	2543584	276958	279999	SPBC25B2.01	SPAPB1E7.11c	SPBC25B2.01	SPAPB1E7.11c	SPBC2G5.08	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64400606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755598	2540430	2539388	276958	275953	SPBC25B2.01	SPCC24B10.12	SPBC25B2.01	cgi121	SPBC2G5.08	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.945270158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755599	2540430	2543593	276958	280008	SPBC25B2.01	SPAC4G9.10	SPBC25B2.01	arg3	SPBC2G5.08	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442406419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755600	2540430	2542921	276958	279362	SPBC25B2.01	SPAC1093.01	SPBC25B2.01	ppr5	SPBC2G5.08	SPAC12B10.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189534942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755601	2540430	2540342	276958	276871	SPBC25B2.01	SPBC2G2.01c	SPBC25B2.01	liz1	SPBC2G5.08	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324250481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755602	2540430	2540599	276958	277125	SPBC25B2.01	SPBC29A3.10c	SPBC25B2.01	atp14	SPBC2G5.08	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77705266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755603	2540430	2541614	276958	278111	SPBC25B2.01	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC25B2.01	elp3	SPBC2G5.08	kat9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042291923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755604	2540430	2540229	276958	276761	SPBC25B2.01	SPBC31F10.15c	SPBC25B2.01	atp15	SPBC2G5.08	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.509416639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755605	2540430	2540619	276958	277145	SPBC25B2.01	SPBC25H2.15	SPBC25B2.01	SPBC25H2.15	SPBC2G5.08	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453195048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755606	2540430	2540829	276958	277347	SPBC25B2.01	SPBC800.09	SPBC25B2.01	sum2	SPBC2G5.08	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.430926602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755607	2540430	2539136	276958	275708	SPBC25B2.01	SPCC1919.05	SPBC25B2.01	SPCC1919.05	SPBC2G5.08	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.368318844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755608	2540430	2540064	276958	276602	SPBC25B2.01	SPBC1718.02	SPBC25B2.01	hop1	SPBC2G5.08	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.741654196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755609	2542393	2543497	278857	279916	SPAC17G6.12	SPAC926.09c	cul1	fas1	pcu1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.150877389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755610	2542393	2542963	278857	279403	SPAC17G6.12	SPAC1071.03c	cul1	sil1	pcu1	SPAC1071.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.622280644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755611	2542393	2541469	278857	277971	SPAC17G6.12	SPAC1F3.05	cul1	gga21	pcu1	SPAC1F3.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.069052096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755612	2542393	2542499	278857	278958	SPAC17G6.12	SPAC1F12.04c	cul1	SPAC1F12.04c	pcu1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.922235934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755613	2542393	2543531	278857	279949	SPAC17G6.12	SPAC926.06c	cul1	SPAC926.06c	pcu1	lrr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.97522885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755614	2542393	2543051	278857	279486	SPAC17G6.12	SPAC1071.08	cul1	rpp203	pcu1	rla6|rpp2-3|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.977047879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755615	2542393	2542460	278857	278921	SPAC17G6.12	SPAC1F12.03c	cul1	SPAC1F12.03c	pcu1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.569785807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755616	2539679	2540279	276234	276810	SPBC12C2.05c	SPBC3B8.04c	bzz1	SPBC3B8.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378485862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755617	2539679	2540913	276234	277429	SPBC12C2.05c	SPBC56F2.08c	bzz1	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.123561608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755618	2539679	2543578	276234	279993	SPBC12C2.05c	SPAC9.10	bzz1	thi9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.155180983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755619	2539679	2542098	276234	278574	SPBC12C2.05c	SPAC30D11.01c	bzz1	gto2	-	SPAC30D11.01c|SPAC56F8.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047289339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755620	2539679	2542502	276234	278960	SPBC12C2.05c	SPAC139.06	bzz1	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865105604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755621	2539679	2542492	276234	278951	SPBC12C2.05c	SPAC1B9.02c	bzz1	sck1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869577874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755622	2539679	2540491	276234	277019	SPBC12C2.05c	SPBC28E12.04	bzz1	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.875305532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755623	2539679	2541951	276234	278438	SPBC12C2.05c	SPAC222.05c	bzz1	mss1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935726226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755624	2539679	2543681	276234	280095	SPBC12C2.05c	SPAC9.02c	bzz1	SPAC9.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.264297996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755625	2539679	2539472	276234	276035	SPBC12C2.05c	SPCC794.03	bzz1	SPCC794.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927439801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755626	2539679	2539937	276234	276481	SPBC12C2.05c	SPBC1539.08	bzz1	arf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.558574406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755627	2539679	2539441	276234	276004	SPBC12C2.05c	SPCPJ732.02c	bzz1	xks1	-	SPCPJ732.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713966841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755628	2539679	2539100	276234	275672	SPBC12C2.05c	SPCC330.12c	bzz1	sdh3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196762213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755629	2539679	2541664	276234	278160	SPBC12C2.05c	SPAC2H10.01	bzz1	SPAC2H10.01	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870575206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755630	2539679	2540192	276234	276725	SPBC12C2.05c	SPBC1215.01	bzz1	shy1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982443627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755631	2539679	2540338	276234	276867	SPBC12C2.05c	SPBC2G2.13c	bzz1	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851896468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755632	2539679	2543272	276234	279700	SPBC12C2.05c	SPAC1002.07c	bzz1	ats1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047633041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755633	2539679	2539046	276234	275619	SPBC12C2.05c	SPCC1223.12c	bzz1	meu10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864089446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755634	2539679	2542235	276234	278707	SPBC12C2.05c	SPAC18G6.05c	bzz1	SPAC18G6.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932810935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755635	2539679	2539454	276234	276017	SPBC12C2.05c	SPCC622.15c	bzz1	SPCC622.15c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.569149076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755636	2539679	2538871	276234	275450	SPBC12C2.05c	SPCC1259.14c	bzz1	meu27	-	B8647-6	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.267960355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755637	2539679	3361455	276234	280531	SPBC12C2.05c	SPAC1782.01	bzz1	ecm29	-	SPAPYUG7.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.806991304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755638	2539679	2543406	276234	279828	SPBC12C2.05c	SPAC9.12c	bzz1	atp12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.411184218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755639	2539679	2540751	276234	277273	SPBC12C2.05c	SPBC20F10.10	bzz1	psl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326429604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755640	2539679	2541326	276234	277838	SPBC12C2.05c	SPBP35G2.03c	bzz1	sgo1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922261499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755641	2539679	2543119	276234	279551	SPBC12C2.05c	SPAC3A11.07	bzz1	nde2	-	SPAC3A11.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194654237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755642	2539679	2539368	276234	275934	SPBC12C2.05c	SPCC16A11.07	bzz1	coq10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.414980247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755643	2539679	2541927	276234	278415	SPBC12C2.05c	SPAC222.12c	bzz1	atp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505506514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755644	2539679	2542255	276234	278725	SPBC12C2.05c	SPAC57A7.08	bzz1	pzh1	-	phz1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262917388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755645	2539679	2540193	276234	276726	SPBC12C2.05c	SPBC1289.10c	bzz1	adn2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865097608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755646	2539679	2541742	276234	278236	SPBC12C2.05c	SPAC22H10.09	bzz1	SPAC22H10.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.670572325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755647	2539679	2541713	276234	278208	SPBC12C2.05c	SPAC3A12.12	bzz1	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.512128981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755648	2539679	2540064	276234	276602	SPBC12C2.05c	SPBC1718.02	bzz1	hop1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391335853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755649	2539679	2543387	276234	279809	SPBC12C2.05c	SPAPB1E7.02c	bzz1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.922608458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755650	2539679	2541808	276234	278299	SPBC12C2.05c	SPAC22A12.14c	bzz1	SPAC22A12.14c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.103591952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755651	2539679	2543448	276234	279868	SPBC12C2.05c	SPAC3H5.07	bzz1	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387177604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755652	2541642	2542143	278138	278619	SPAC10F6.05c	SPAC17C9.07	ubc6	alg8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.782780848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755653	2541642	2539201	278138	275772	SPAC10F6.05c	SPCC188.09c	ubc6	pfl4	-	SPCC188.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.77283434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755654	2541642	2542613	278138	279067	SPAC10F6.05c	SPAC18B11.03c	ubc6	SPAC18B11.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147027146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755655	2541642	2542331	278138	278797	SPAC10F6.05c	SPAC1834.05	ubc6	alg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.630079252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755656	2541642	2541776	278138	278270	SPAC10F6.05c	SPAC23H3.05c	ubc6	swd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047695725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755657	2541642	2539667	278138	276222	SPAC10F6.05c	SPBC13G1.08c	ubc6	ash2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866944331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755658	2541642	2538841	278138	275422	SPAC10F6.05c	SPCC550.03c	ubc6	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.866938733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755659	2541642	2542214	278138	278688	SPAC10F6.05c	SPACUNK4.11c	ubc6	mpp6	-	SPACUNK4.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.192418421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755660	2541642	2541694	278138	278190	SPAC10F6.05c	SPAC1071.04c	ubc6	spc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.624168932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755661	2541642	2540589	278138	277115	SPAC10F6.05c	SPBC20F10.06	ubc6	mad2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820792155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755662	2541642	2541628	278138	278124	SPAC10F6.05c	SPAC110.02	ubc6	pds5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.662746421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755663	2541642	2540657	278138	277182	SPAC10F6.05c	SPBC1E8.02	ubc6	SPBC1E8.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.053558936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755664	2541642	2540089	278138	276627	SPAC10F6.05c	SPBC32H8.01c	ubc6	SPBC32H8.01c	-	SPBP22H7.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818391642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755665	2541642	2541757	278138	278251	SPAC10F6.05c	SPAC2F7.10	ubc6	akr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452203983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755666	2541642	2540333	278138	276863	SPAC10F6.05c	SPBC21B10.07	ubc6	SPBC21B10.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19860738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755667	2541642	2543277	278138	279705	SPAC10F6.05c	SPAC1002.03c	ubc6	gls2	-	gls2alpha	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445259724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755668	2541642	2539531	278138	276093	SPAC10F6.05c	SPCC576.02	ubc6	SPCC576.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045364052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755669	2541642	2542566	278138	279022	SPAC10F6.05c	SPAC8C9.12c	ubc6	SPAC8C9.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812757445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755670	2541642	2542460	278138	278921	SPAC10F6.05c	SPAC1F12.03c	ubc6	SPAC1F12.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.705079664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755671	2541642	2543472	278138	279892	SPAC10F6.05c	SPAC959.04c	ubc6	omh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.120891491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755672	2541642	2540320	278138	276850	SPAC10F6.05c	SPBC3D6.04c	ubc6	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573819457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755673	2541642	2540649	278138	277174	SPAC10F6.05c	SPBC19F8.08	ubc6	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814865501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755674	2540346	2542207	276875	278682	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC17H9.10c	ebs1	ddb1	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.726795164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755675	2540346	2543414	276875	279836	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC630.10	ebs1	SPAC630.10	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.806006614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755676	2540346	2539930	276875	276474	SPBC2F12.03c	SPBC1198.11c	ebs1	reb1	SPBC2F12.03c	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851705984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755677	2540346	2542273	276875	278742	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC17H9.13c	ebs1	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.942450758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755678	2540346	2541500	276875	278002	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC227.18	ebs1	lys3	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC2F7.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.250464777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755679	2540346	2540692	276875	277217	SPBC2F12.03c	SPBC800.07c	ebs1	tsf1	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.342250865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755680	2540346	2540220	276875	276753	SPBC2F12.03c	SPBC337.03	ebs1	rhn1	SPBC2F12.03c	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.666092238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755681	2540346	2542135	276875	278611	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC13A11.04c	ebs1	ubp8	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199668543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755682	2540346	2542318	276875	278784	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC16C9.05	ebs1	cph1	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.591589962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755683	2540346	2539792	276875	276342	SPBC2F12.03c	SPBC1271.14	ebs1	SPBC1271.14	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.532615252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755684	2540346	2540595	276875	277121	SPBC2F12.03c	SPBC21C3.02c	ebs1	dep1	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.735658629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755685	2540346	2539352	276875	275918	SPBC2F12.03c	SPCC188.07	ebs1	ccq1	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.529542152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755686	2540346	3361543	276875	280619	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC9.13c	ebs1	cwf16	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAPJ735.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.429375806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755687	2540346	2540964	276875	277480	SPBC2F12.03c	SPBC365.16	ebs1	SPBC365.16	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.763157438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755688	2540346	2539023	276875	275596	SPBC2F12.03c	SPCC594.05c	ebs1	spf1	SPBC2F12.03c	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.65077975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755689	2540346	2542036	276875	278518	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC23A1.19c	ebs1	hrq1	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.878761079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755690	2540346	2541776	276875	278270	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC23H3.05c	ebs1	swd1	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.667335581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755691	2540346	2543593	276875	280008	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC4G9.10	ebs1	arg3	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.015914814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755692	2540346	2540338	276875	276867	SPBC2F12.03c	SPBC2G2.13c	ebs1	dcd1	SPBC2F12.03c	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.395435862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755693	2540346	2540352	276875	276881	SPBC2F12.03c	SPBC215.03c	ebs1	csn1	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.085178983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755694	2540346	2542160	276875	278636	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC8C9.11	ebs1	fra2	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC8C9.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.971992156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755695	2540346	2543638	276875	280052	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC3H8.09c	ebs1	nab3	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.293623992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755696	2540346	2541496	276875	277998	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC23D3.09	ebs1	arp42	SPBC2F12.03c	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.99260966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755697	2540346	2541183	276875	277697	SPBC2F12.03c	SPBC725.14	ebs1	arg6	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.318874789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755698	2540346	2539857	276875	276404	SPBC2F12.03c	SPBC1604.20c	ebs1	tea2	SPBC2F12.03c	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634619515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755699	2540346	2540326	276875	276856	SPBC2F12.03c	SPBC2G5.06c	ebs1	hmt2	SPBC2F12.03c	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.656776952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755700	2540346	2542007	276875	278490	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC20H4.07	ebs1	rad57	SPBC2F12.03c	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.840502343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755701	2540346	2539815	276875	276365	SPBC2F12.03c	SPBC1105.02c	ebs1	lys4	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.31702014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755702	2540346	2542867	276875	279312	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC343.16	ebs1	lys2	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.847175561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755703	2540346	2542519	276875	278977	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC19G12.08	ebs1	scs7	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.879140182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755704	2540346	2539481	276875	276044	SPBC2F12.03c	SPCC622.16c	ebs1	epe1	SPBC2F12.03c	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.661848865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755705	2540346	2540990	276875	277506	SPBC2F12.03c	SPBC36B7.06c	ebs1	mug20	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.19729773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755706	2540346	2542597	276875	279051	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAP8A3.07c	ebs1	SPAP8A3.07c	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.531181325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755707	2540346	2541186	276875	277700	SPBC2F12.03c	SPBC725.01	ebs1	SPBC725.01	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.23734829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755708	2540346	2540533	276875	277061	SPBC2F12.03c	SPBC29A10.16c	ebs1	SPBC29A10.16c	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.025703628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755709	2540346	2540229	276875	276761	SPBC2F12.03c	SPBC31F10.15c	ebs1	atp15	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.69457555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755710	2540346	2541927	276875	278415	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC222.12c	ebs1	atp2	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.383677146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755711	2540346	2538884	276875	275462	SPBC2F12.03c	SPCC1393.08	ebs1	SPCC1393.08	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.314092637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755712	2540346	2539519	276875	276081	SPBC2F12.03c	SPCC364.05	ebs1	vps3	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.339847384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755713	2540346	2540946	276875	277462	SPBC2F12.03c	SPBC36.04	ebs1	cys11	SPBC2F12.03c	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.906133148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755714	2540346	2541713	276875	278208	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC3A12.12	ebs1	atp11	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.248841423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755715	2540346	2543391	276875	279813	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC4G9.09c	ebs1	arg11	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.432767522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755716	2540346	2538762	276875	275345	SPBC2F12.03c	SPCC306.04c	ebs1	set1	SPBC2F12.03c	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.996450347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755717	2540346	2540998	276875	277514	SPBC2F12.03c	SPBC3D6.05	ebs1	ptp4	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.688314014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755718	2540346	2541531	276875	278031	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC25A8.01c	ebs1	fft3	SPBC2F12.03c	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.935812258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755719	2540346	2542418	276875	278881	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC1805.07c	ebs1	dad2	SPBC2F12.03c	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.120776415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755720	2540346	2543044	276875	279479	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC3C7.12	ebs1	tip1	SPBC2F12.03c	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.765891733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755721	2540346	2538840	276875	275421	SPBC2F12.03c	SPCC736.07c	ebs1	SPCC736.07c	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.399116545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755722	2540346	2541675	276875	278171	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC22F8.12c	ebs1	shf1	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.37867721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755723	2540346	2541806	276875	278297	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC4G8.13c	ebs1	prz1	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.344743949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755724	2540346	2542424	276875	278886	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC1805.14	ebs1	SPAC1805.14	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.991751078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755725	2540346	2541050	276875	277565	SPBC2F12.03c	SPBC428.05c	ebs1	arg12	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.033637704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755726	2540346	2539001	276875	275575	SPBC2F12.03c	SPCC1494.08c	ebs1	SPCC1494.08c	SPBC2F12.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.696845927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755727	2540346	2542609	276875	279063	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC31G5.04	ebs1	lys12	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC31G5.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.772229687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755728	2541373	2540524	277884	277052	SPBP8B7.18c	SPBC21B10.08c	SPBP8B7.18c	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04562367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755729	2541373	2543578	277884	279993	SPBP8B7.18c	SPAC9.10	SPBP8B7.18c	thi9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.694769566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755730	2541373	2540535	277884	277062	SPBP8B7.18c	SPBC215.01	SPBP8B7.18c	SPBC215.01	-	SPBC3B9.20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.803090848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755731	2541373	2542714	277884	279167	SPBP8B7.18c	SPAC5H10.06c	SPBP8B7.18c	adh4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865480828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755732	2541373	2540751	277884	277273	SPBP8B7.18c	SPBC20F10.10	SPBP8B7.18c	psl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.130159549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755733	2541373	2539317	277884	275883	SPBP8B7.18c	SPCC16A11.08	SPBP8B7.18c	atg20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.274844504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755734	2541373	2540891	277884	277407	SPBP8B7.18c	SPBC582.08	SPBP8B7.18c	SPBC582.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.773197702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755735	2541373	2540333	277884	276863	SPBP8B7.18c	SPBC21B10.07	SPBP8B7.18c	SPBC21B10.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.150474877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755736	2541633	2540060	278129	276598	SPAC664.01c	SPBC106.01	swi6	mph1	SPAC824.10c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.886201914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755737	2541633	2543529	278129	279947	SPAC664.01c	SPAC4C5.02c	swi6	ryh1	SPAC824.10c	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.068918083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755738	2541633	2542358	278129	278823	SPAC664.01c	SPAC1782.09c	swi6	clp1	SPAC824.10c	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.132014552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755739	2541633	2541856	278129	278347	SPAC664.01c	SPAC23H3.08c	swi6	bub3	SPAC824.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.037999149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755740	2541633	2539226	278129	275796	SPAC664.01c	SPCC16C4.20c	swi6	SPCC16C4.20c	SPAC824.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.927253428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755741	2541633	2539420	278129	275985	SPAC664.01c	SPCC970.07c	swi6	raf2	SPAC824.10c	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.998570107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755742	2541633	2540919	278129	277435	SPAC664.01c	SPBC543.07	swi6	pek1	SPAC824.10c	mkk1|skh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.888868366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755743	2541633	2539434	278129	275997	SPAC664.01c	SPCC757.09c	swi6	rnc1	SPAC824.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.83242832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755744	2541633	2542627	278129	279081	SPAC664.01c	SPAC750.04c	swi6	SPAC750.04c	SPAC824.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982513641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755745	2541633	2542012	278129	278495	SPAC664.01c	SPAC23C11.02c	swi6	rps23	SPAC824.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.053570219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755746	2541633	2542318	278129	278784	SPAC664.01c	SPAC16C9.05	swi6	cph1	SPAC824.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.480199347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755747	2541633	2543685	278129	280099	SPAC664.01c	SPAC3C7.03c	swi6	rad55	SPAC824.10c	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574075992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755748	2541633	2539244	278129	275814	SPAC664.01c	SPCC1672.06c	swi6	asp1	SPAC824.10c	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.718923114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755749	2541633	2538906	278129	275483	SPAC664.01c	SPCC1259.03	swi6	rpa12	SPAC824.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.437668593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755750	2541633	2540825	278129	277343	SPAC664.01c	SPBC428.08c	swi6	clr4	SPAC824.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.558083235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755751	2541633	2542665	278129	279118	SPAC664.01c	SPAC10F6.08c	swi6	nht10	SPAC824.10c	nht1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.195539995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755752	2541633	2539388	278129	275953	SPAC664.01c	SPCC24B10.12	swi6	cgi121	SPAC824.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.740200434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755753	2541633	2542123	278129	278599	SPAC664.01c	SPAC18G6.15	swi6	mal3	SPAC824.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.186148498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755754	2541633	2538706	278129	275290	SPAC664.01c	SPCC338.08	swi6	ctp1	SPAC824.10c	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.676975761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755755	2541633	2542507	278129	278965	SPAC664.01c	SPAC18G6.13	swi6	SPAC18G6.13	SPAC824.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.901348805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755756	2541633	2540673	278129	277198	SPAC664.01c	SPBC1D7.03	swi6	mug80	SPAC824.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.115961218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755757	2541633	2541496	278129	277998	SPAC664.01c	SPAC23D3.09	swi6	arp42	SPAC824.10c	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.497275453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755758	2541633	2543118	278129	279550	SPAC664.01c	SPAC3G6.11	swi6	chl1	SPAC824.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978194391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755759	2541633	2539481	278129	276044	SPAC664.01c	SPCC622.16c	swi6	epe1	SPAC824.10c	kdm2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.814726853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755760	2541633	2539215	278129	275785	SPAC664.01c	SPCC285.16c	swi6	msh6	SPAC824.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63171358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755761	2541633	2539812	278129	276362	SPAC664.01c	SPBC1347.02	swi6	fkbp39	SPAC824.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.709050451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755762	2541633	2540589	278129	277115	SPAC664.01c	SPBC20F10.06	swi6	mad2	SPAC824.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.733369707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755763	2541633	2540821	278129	277339	SPAC664.01c	SPBC800.03	swi6	clr3	SPAC824.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.493457914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755764	2541633	2539908	278129	276454	SPAC664.01c	SPBC13E7.06	swi6	msd1	SPAC824.10c	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704966531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755765	2541633	2539101	278129	275673	SPAC664.01c	SPCC736.04c	swi6	gma12	SPAC824.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.359224119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755766	2541633	2543619	278129	280033	SPAC664.01c	SPAC4F10.04	swi6	ypa1	SPAC824.10c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.264335825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755767	2541633	2539555	278129	276116	SPAC664.01c	SPCC4B3.08	swi6	lsg1	SPAC824.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.460845268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755768	2541633	2540555	278129	277082	SPAC664.01c	SPBP16F5.02	swi6	mcs2	SPAC824.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.877396168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755769	2541633	2540936	278129	277452	SPAC664.01c	SPBC800.05c	swi6	atb2	SPAC824.10c	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.429588025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755770	2541633	2539928	278129	276472	SPAC664.01c	SPBC1604.08c	swi6	imp1	SPAC824.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515795198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755771	2541633	2539920	278129	276464	SPAC664.01c	SPBC119.08	swi6	pmk1	SPAC824.10c	spm1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.078903288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755772	2541633	2539700	278129	276253	SPAC664.01c	SPBC1685.15c	swi6	klp6	SPAC824.10c	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.28386406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755773	2541633	2543387	278129	279809	SPAC664.01c	SPAPB1E7.02c	swi6	mcl1	SPAC824.10c	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.037254809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755774	2541200	2538939	277714	275514	SPBC8D2.03c	SPCC1672.04c	hhf2	SPCC1672.04c	ams3|h4.2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769432442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755775	2541200	2539050	277714	275623	SPBC8D2.03c	SPCC11E10.08	hhf2	rik1	ams3|h4.2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.21904915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755776	2541200	2543529	277714	279947	SPBC8D2.03c	SPAC4C5.02c	hhf2	ryh1	ams3|h4.2	hos1|sat7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.197043348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755777	2541200	2540686	277714	277211	SPBC8D2.03c	SPBC21D10.10	hhf2	bdc1	ams3|h4.2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.754899723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755778	2541200	2542035	277714	278517	SPBC8D2.03c	SPAP8A3.04c	hhf2	hsp9	ams3|h4.2	scf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992917227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755779	2541200	2542468	277714	278929	SPBC8D2.03c	SPAC1D4.09c	hhf2	rtf2	ams3|h4.2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.000951779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755780	2541200	2541682	277714	278178	SPBC8D2.03c	SPAC15F9.02	hhf2	seh1	ams3|h4.2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868591748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755781	2541200	2542318	277714	278784	SPBC8D2.03c	SPAC16C9.05	hhf2	cph1	ams3|h4.2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.044051254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755782	2541200	2541801	277714	278292	SPBC8D2.03c	SPAC2F7.08c	hhf2	snf5	ams3|h4.2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.338285967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755783	2541200	2542513	277714	278971	SPBC8D2.03c	SPAC1952.05	hhf2	gcn5	ams3|h4.2	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.488327362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755784	2541200	2542463	277714	278924	SPBC8D2.03c	SPAC1834.03c	hhf2	hhf1	ams3|h4.2	h4.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.57962757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755785	2541200	2542469	277714	278930	SPBC8D2.03c	SPAC19A8.04	hhf2	erg5	ams3|h4.2	cyp61	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.529114751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755786	2541200	2538871	277714	275450	SPBC8D2.03c	SPCC1259.14c	hhf2	meu27	ams3|h4.2	B8647-6	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864678374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755787	2541200	2539857	277714	276404	SPBC8D2.03c	SPBC1604.20c	hhf2	tea2	ams3|h4.2	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390369769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755788	2541200	2539667	277714	276222	SPBC8D2.03c	SPBC13G1.08c	hhf2	ash2	ams3|h4.2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.862110853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755789	2541200	2542710	277714	279163	SPBC8D2.03c	SPAC750.08c	hhf2	SPAC750.08c	ams3|h4.2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448749447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755790	2541200	2542933	277714	279374	SPBC8D2.03c	SPAPYUG7.06	hhf2	sdu1	ams3|h4.2	mug67|hag1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.892662501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755791	2541200	2540967	277714	277483	SPBC8D2.03c	SPBC36B7.08c	hhf2	SPBC36B7.08c	ams3|h4.2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.66308484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755792	2541200	2540229	277714	276761	SPBC8D2.03c	SPBC31F10.15c	hhf2	atp15	ams3|h4.2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978747395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755793	2541200	2538762	277714	275345	SPBC8D2.03c	SPCC306.04c	hhf2	set1	ams3|h4.2	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713889742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755794	2541200	2543628	277714	280042	SPBC8D2.03c	SPAC3H8.10	hhf2	spo20	ams3|h4.2	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577018408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755795	2541200	2542418	277714	278881	SPBC8D2.03c	SPAC1805.07c	hhf2	dad2	ams3|h4.2	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.27465027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755796	2541200	2542303	277714	278770	SPBC8D2.03c	SPAC1687.21	hhf2	SPAC1687.21	ams3|h4.2	SPAC222.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981108879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755797	2541200	2540555	277714	277082	SPBC8D2.03c	SPBP16F5.02	hhf2	mcs2	ams3|h4.2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189818453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755798	2541200	2539700	277714	276253	SPBC8D2.03c	SPBC1685.15c	hhf2	klp6	ams3|h4.2	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514411894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755799	2541200	2543387	277714	279809	SPBC8D2.03c	SPAPB1E7.02c	hhf2	mcl1	ams3|h4.2	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.923029276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755800	2541200	2542175	277714	278650	SPBC8D2.03c	SPAC1F3.02c	hhf2	mkh1	ams3|h4.2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.341160135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755801	2541200	2540558	277714	277085	SPBC8D2.03c	SPBC2D10.17	hhf2	clr1	ams3|h4.2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.552198612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755802	2542894	2541495	279338	277997	SPAC144.17c	SPAP8A3.02c	SPAC144.17c	ofd2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.838431129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755803	2542894	2538721	279338	275305	SPAC144.17c	SPCC1494.10	SPAC144.17c	adn3	-	SPCC70.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.846219144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755804	2542894	2543064	279338	279497	SPAC144.17c	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC144.17c	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.43965632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755805	2542894	2542530	279338	278988	SPAC144.17c	SPAC1399.02	SPAC144.17c	SPAC1399.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.262038669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755806	2542894	2542213	279338	278687	SPAC144.17c	SPAC3G6.13c	SPAC144.17c	rpl4101	-	rpl41-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.4398844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755807	2542894	2540964	279338	277480	SPAC144.17c	SPBC365.16	SPAC144.17c	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.840823837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755808	2542894	2542036	279338	278518	SPAC144.17c	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC144.17c	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978027147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755809	2542894	2542177	279338	278652	SPAC144.17c	SPAC17H9.08	SPAC144.17c	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511850551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755810	2542894	2541249	279338	277763	SPAC144.17c	SPBC947.01	SPAC144.17c	alf1	-	SPBC947.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505232217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755811	2542894	2542971	279338	279410	SPAC144.17c	SPAC105.02c	SPAC144.17c	SPAC105.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.973876153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755812	2542894	2539233	279338	275803	SPAC144.17c	SPCC16A11.03c	SPAC144.17c	SPCC16A11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.115965448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755813	2542894	2540086	279338	276624	SPAC144.17c	SPBC16H5.12c	SPAC144.17c	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706632981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755814	2542894	2538769	279338	275352	SPAC144.17c	SPCC126.04c	SPAC144.17c	sgf73	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.768499498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755815	2542894	2538837	279338	275418	SPAC144.17c	SPCC4B3.03c	SPAC144.17c	SPCC4B3.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809174845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755816	2542894	2541536	279338	278036	SPAC144.17c	SPAC1071.02	SPAC144.17c	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.674787414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755817	2542894	2541708	279338	278203	SPAC144.17c	SPAC31A2.02	SPAC144.17c	trm112	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.437043838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755818	2542894	2540229	279338	276761	SPAC144.17c	SPBC31F10.15c	SPAC144.17c	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.446650974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755819	2542894	2539812	279338	276362	SPAC144.17c	SPBC1347.02	SPAC144.17c	fkbp39	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094284921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755820	2542894	2540946	279338	277462	SPAC144.17c	SPBC36.04	SPAC144.17c	cys11	-	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32944778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755821	2542894	2543113	279338	279545	SPAC144.17c	SPAC3F10.07c	SPAC144.17c	erf4	-	mug91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641505082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755822	2542894	2541798	279338	278289	SPAC144.17c	SPAC22F3.03c	SPAC144.17c	rdh54	-	mug34|tid1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504596972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755823	2542894	2539354	279338	275920	SPAC144.17c	SPCC4F11.03c	SPAC144.17c	SPCC4F11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.322685805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755824	2542894	2542401	279338	278865	SPAC144.17c	SPAC1142.02c	SPAC144.17c	SPAC1142.02c	-	SPAC17G6.19c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.840468298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755825	2542894	2542881	279338	279326	SPAC144.17c	SPAC13F5.03c	SPAC144.17c	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.682684605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755826	2542894	2543600	279338	280015	SPAC144.17c	SPAPB1A10.05	SPAC144.17c	SPAPB1A10.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.323837038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755827	2542894	2540516	279338	277044	SPAC144.17c	SPBC21C3.01c	SPAC144.17c	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.987946591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755828	2542894	2540245	279338	276777	SPAC144.17c	SPBC31F10.17c	SPAC144.17c	SPBC31F10.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.558906118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755829	2542894	2539251	279338	275821	SPAC144.17c	SPCC24B10.02c	SPAC144.17c	SPCC24B10.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.109494003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755830	2542894	2540489	279338	277017	SPAC144.17c	SPBC25H2.03	SPAC144.17c	SPBC25H2.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.097169194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755831	2542894	2542607	279338	279061	SPAC144.17c	SPAC18B11.02c	SPAC144.17c	SPAC18B11.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.682405124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755832	2542894	2540380	279338	276909	SPAC144.17c	SPBC1A4.05	SPAC144.17c	blt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641268546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755833	2542894	2543387	279338	279809	SPAC144.17c	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC144.17c	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.195702649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755834	2542894	2542578	279338	279034	SPAC144.17c	SPAC18B11.09c	SPAC144.17c	SPAC18B11.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444958682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755835	2541251	2539147	277765	275719	SPBC947.10	SPCC622.12c	dsc1	gdh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510942126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755836	2541251	2541475	277765	277977	SPBC947.10	SPAC24B11.09	dsc1	mpc2	-	SPAC24B11.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994757703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755837	2541251	2538961	277765	275535	SPBC947.10	SPCC285.14	dsc1	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.74505336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755838	2541251	2543637	277765	280051	SPBC947.10	SPAC3H8.02	dsc1	csr102	-	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.752929904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755839	2541251	2543064	277765	279497	SPBC947.10	SPAC3G6.01	dsc1	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.30973591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755840	2541251	2539156	277765	275728	SPBC947.10	SPCC1450.08c	dsc1	wtf16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.925285907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755841	2541251	2539582	277765	276141	SPBC947.10	SPCC594.07c	dsc1	bqt3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.496327962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755842	2541251	2540524	277765	277052	SPBC947.10	SPBC21B10.08c	dsc1	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.741213203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755843	2541251	2539035	277765	275608	SPBC947.10	SPCC794.09c	dsc1	tef101	-	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.917903421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755844	2541251	2539939	277765	276483	SPBC947.10	SPBC11G11.01	dsc1	fis1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.319858221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755845	2541251	2543376	277765	279798	SPBC947.10	SPAC3H1.06c	dsc1	SPAC3H1.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441278163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755846	2541251	2542103	277765	278579	SPBC947.10	SPAC31G5.11	dsc1	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.014843273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755847	2541251	2542677	277765	279130	SPBC947.10	SPAC26F1.10c	dsc1	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.758027857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755848	2541251	2542273	277765	278742	SPBC947.10	SPAC17H9.13c	dsc1	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.048925716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755849	2541251	2542641	277765	279095	SPBC947.10	SPAC24C9.15c	dsc1	spn5	-	mde9|meu28	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.695271453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755850	2541251	2542816	277765	279263	SPBC947.10	SPAC4G8.11c	dsc1	atp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380599811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755851	2541251	2539463	277765	276026	SPBC947.10	SPCC550.11	dsc1	SPCC550.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.318036457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755852	2541251	2540029	277765	276573	SPBC947.10	SPBC16A3.01	dsc1	spn3	-	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.393136797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755853	2541251	2538801	277765	275382	SPBC947.10	SPCC285.13c	dsc1	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.471887106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755854	2541251	2539249	277765	275819	SPBC947.10	SPCC1450.05c	dsc1	rox3	-	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.43192582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755855	2541251	2539576	277765	276136	SPBC947.10	SPCC794.01c	dsc1	zwf2	-	SPCC794.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634490485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755856	2541251	2540306	277765	276836	SPBC947.10	SPBC2G5.02c	dsc1	ckb2	-	SPBC2G5.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.437915064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755857	2541251	2543453	277765	279873	SPBC947.10	SPAC3G9.03	dsc1	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.945526377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755858	2541251	2541026	277765	277541	SPBC947.10	SPBC337.09	dsc1	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568655921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755859	2541251	2541558	277765	278057	SPBC947.10	SPAC1F7.08	dsc1	fio1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.290628953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755860	2541251	2542012	277765	278495	SPBC947.10	SPAC23C11.02c	dsc1	rps23	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.618800219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755861	2541251	2539302	277765	275870	SPBC947.10	SPCC126.09	dsc1	zip2	-	SPCC126.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.41763571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755862	2541251	2541998	277765	278482	SPBC947.10	SPAC23A1.09	dsc1	SPAC23A1.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389382094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755863	2541251	2542135	277765	278611	SPBC947.10	SPAC13A11.04c	dsc1	ubp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.185792348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755864	2541251	2542318	277765	278784	SPBC947.10	SPAC16C9.05	dsc1	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.526445479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755865	2541251	2539721	277765	276274	SPBC947.10	SPBC146.04	dsc1	SPBC146.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992265949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755866	2541251	2540467	277765	276995	SPBC947.10	SPBC2G2.07c	dsc1	mug178	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767053942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755867	2541251	2540263	277765	276794	SPBC947.10	SPBC32H8.02c	dsc1	nep2	-	mug120|pi021|SPACTOKYO_453.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.315517812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755868	2541251	2541311	277765	277823	SPBC947.10	SPBP8B7.09c	dsc1	los1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386433935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755869	2541251	2541522	277765	278023	SPBC947.10	SPAC23E2.01	dsc1	fep1	-	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.059029533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755870	2541251	2540714	277765	277237	SPBC947.10	SPBC19C2.04c	dsc1	ubp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322982806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755871	2541251	2539237	277765	275807	SPBC947.10	SPCC24B10.13	dsc1	skb5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.564590389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755872	2541251	2539051	277765	275624	SPBC947.10	SPCC1183.11	dsc1	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.60830427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755873	2541251	2541664	277765	278160	SPBC947.10	SPAC2H10.01	dsc1	SPAC2H10.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.06782361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755874	2541251	2542707	277765	279160	SPBC947.10	SPAC25G10.03	dsc1	zip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.548397524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755875	2541251	2540647	277765	277172	SPBC947.10	SPBC18H10.07	dsc1	SPBC18H10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.684018487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755876	2541251	2541038	277765	277553	SPBC947.10	SPBC29A10.01	dsc1	ccr1	-	SPBC365.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.008810843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755877	2541251	2541543	277765	278043	SPBC947.10	SPAC5H10.04	dsc1	SPAC5H10.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.44643346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755878	2541251	2542983	277765	279421	SPBC947.10	SPAC11D3.15	dsc1	SPAC11D3.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.001951768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755879	2541251	2542989	277765	279427	SPBC947.10	SPAC11E3.13c	dsc1	gas5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.415334477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755880	2541251	2542469	277765	278930	SPBC947.10	SPAC19A8.04	dsc1	erg5	-	cyp61	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.629100921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755881	2541251	2539857	277765	276404	SPBC947.10	SPBC1604.20c	dsc1	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.70819037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755882	2541251	2540665	277765	277190	SPBC947.10	SPBC83.02c	dsc1	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.336591636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755883	2541251	2538774	277765	275356	SPBC947.10	SPCC162.06c	dsc1	SPCC162.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.053383657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755884	2541251	2542710	277765	279163	SPBC947.10	SPAC750.08c	dsc1	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.429395295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755885	2541251	2542946	277765	279386	SPBC947.10	SPAC6F12.03c	dsc1	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.265787156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755886	2541251	2542419	277765	278882	SPBC947.10	SPAC17G6.05c	dsc1	bro1	-	SPAC17G6.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.454699978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755887	2541251	2543495	277765	279914	SPBC947.10	SPAC513.03	dsc1	mfm2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712592092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755888	2541251	2542254	277765	278724	SPBC947.10	SPAC30D11.04c	dsc1	nup124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.269265942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755889	2541251	2543301	277765	279726	SPBC947.10	SPAC977.17	dsc1	SPAC977.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.433935666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755890	2541251	2543683	277765	280097	SPBC947.10	SPAPB1E7.04c	dsc1	SPAPB1E7.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.882390832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755891	2541251	2540201	277765	276734	SPBC947.10	SPBC13A2.04c	dsc1	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.459075086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755892	2541251	2541708	277765	278203	SPBC947.10	SPAC31A2.02	dsc1	trm112	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.498086238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755893	2541251	2541296	277765	277808	SPBC947.10	SPBP8B7.06	dsc1	rpp201	-	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.417901031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755894	2541251	2539427	277765	275992	SPBC947.10	SPCC663.15c	dsc1	SPCC663.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.083571993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755895	2541251	2540357	277765	276886	SPBC947.10	SPBC2F12.05c	dsc1	SPBC2F12.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.396281441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755896	2541251	2539213	277765	275783	SPBC947.10	SPCC285.10c	dsc1	SPCC285.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.82146195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755897	2541251	3361520	277765	280596	SPBC947.10	SPAC1610.02c	dsc1	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.977916856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755898	2541251	2540001	277765	276545	SPBC947.10	SPBC1289.13c	dsc1	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.840583683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755899	2541251	2541156	277765	277671	SPBC947.10	SPBC685.07c	dsc1	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842307095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755900	2541251	2538762	277765	275345	SPBC947.10	SPCC306.04c	dsc1	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.005002708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755901	2541251	2542767	277765	279217	SPBC947.10	SPAC1565.07c	dsc1	knd1	-	SPAC1565.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378284914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755902	2541251	2540152	277765	276688	SPBC947.10	SPBC12C2.03c	dsc1	SPBC12C2.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.407819758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755903	2541251	2542541	277765	278998	SPBC947.10	SPAC1B3.03c	dsc1	wis2	-	cyp5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392219062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755904	2541251	2540725	277765	277248	SPBC947.10	SPBC215.14c	dsc1	vps20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.833843166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755905	2541251	2538756	277765	275339	SPBC947.10	SPCC1795.10c	dsc1	SPCC1795.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636535475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755906	2541251	2539013	277765	275586	SPBC947.10	SPCC364.03	dsc1	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.130181486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755907	2541251	2538692	277765	275277	SPBC947.10	SPCC162.04c	dsc1	wtf13	-	wtf12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.861226895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755908	2541251	2542403	277765	278867	SPBC947.10	SPAC19A8.05c	dsc1	sst4	-	vps27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.043562974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755909	2541251	2538889	277765	275467	SPBC947.10	SPCC1393.07c	dsc1	mug4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.510509399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755910	2541251	2541404	277765	277913	SPBC947.10	SPBPB2B2.18	dsc1	SPBPB2B2.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.922172438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755911	2541251	2541380	277765	277891	SPBC947.10	SPBPB2B2.13	dsc1	gal1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.494315595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755912	2541251	2540936	277765	277452	SPBC947.10	SPBC800.05c	dsc1	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318782059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755913	2541251	2542838	277765	279284	SPBC947.10	SPAC13G7.11	dsc1	SPAC13G7.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.587124551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755914	2541251	2540489	277765	277017	SPBC947.10	SPBC25H2.03	dsc1	SPBC25H2.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.562554743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755915	2541251	2540333	277765	276863	SPBC947.10	SPBC21B10.07	dsc1	SPBC21B10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.435470739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755916	2541251	2540278	277765	276809	SPBC947.10	SPBC1A4.04	dsc1	SPBC1A4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706832415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755917	2541251	2543525	277765	279943	SPBC947.10	SPAC4A8.14	dsc1	SPAC4A8.14	-	prs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.758191072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755918	2541251	2538792	277765	275373	SPBC947.10	SPCP1E11.10	dsc1	SPCP1E11.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.430995756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755919	2541251	2542423	277765	278885	SPBC947.10	SPAC17G6.08	dsc1	pep7	-	vac1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.069096545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755920	2541251	2539169	277765	275740	SPBC947.10	SPCC1235.11	dsc1	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.468228124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755921	2541251	2543220	277765	279648	SPBC947.10	SPAPB21F2.02	dsc1	SPAPB21F2.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197086627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755922	2541251	2541675	277765	278171	SPBC947.10	SPAC22F8.12c	dsc1	shf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.133423533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755923	2541251	2541357	277765	277868	SPBC947.10	SPBPB7E8.01	dsc1	SPBPB7E8.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.763229397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755924	2541251	2541806	277765	278297	SPBC947.10	SPAC4G8.13c	dsc1	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639816223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755925	2541251	2541774	277765	278268	SPBC947.10	SPAC22E12.05c	dsc1	rer1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.789014631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755926	2541251	2543327	277765	279750	SPBC947.10	SPAC1D4.06c	dsc1	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.462181468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755927	2541251	2540828	277765	277346	SPBC947.10	SPBC4B4.06	dsc1	vps25	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.920399739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755928	2541251	2539743	277765	276295	SPBC947.10	SPBC16A3.08c	dsc1	oga1	-	SPBC16A3.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.078354859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755929	2541251	2543646	277765	280060	SPBC947.10	SPAC821.07c	dsc1	moc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.586661871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755930	2541251	2540208	277765	276741	SPBC947.10	SPBC9B6.03	dsc1	SPBC9B6.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713880996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755931	2541251	2542617	277765	279071	SPBC947.10	SPAC13A11.01c	dsc1	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633064425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755932	2540751	2542207	277273	278682	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC17H9.10c	psl1	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.698418904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755933	2540751	2539050	277273	275623	SPBC20F10.10	SPCC11E10.08	psl1	rik1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.407126589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755934	2540751	2540913	277273	277429	SPBC20F10.10	SPBC56F2.08c	psl1	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.008082698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755935	2540751	2538977	277273	275551	SPBC20F10.10	SPCC1020.06c	psl1	tal1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381141757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755936	2540751	2539165	277273	275736	SPBC20F10.10	SPCC1281.04	psl1	SPCC1281.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926226642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755937	2540751	2542706	277273	279159	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC29B12.13	psl1	SPAC29B12.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932920167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755938	2540751	2539930	277273	276474	SPBC20F10.10	SPBC1198.11c	psl1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.864316626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755939	2540751	2541438	277273	277943	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC23G3.10c	psl1	ssr3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091607457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755940	2540751	2542701	277273	279154	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC26H5.05	psl1	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86583204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755941	2540751	2538806	277273	275387	SPBC20F10.10	SPCC1840.09	psl1	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039747377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755942	2540751	2539420	277273	275985	SPBC20F10.10	SPCC970.07c	psl1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.072115256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755943	2540751	2538847	277273	275428	SPBC20F10.10	SPCC594.06c	psl1	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515816156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755944	2540751	2542273	277273	278742	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC17H9.13c	psl1	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.531009776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755945	2540751	2542816	277273	279263	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC4G8.11c	psl1	atp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844654888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755946	2540751	2541503	277273	278005	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC22A12.01c	psl1	pso2	-	SPAC56F8.17c|snm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.545760103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755947	2540751	2540425	277273	276953	SPBC20F10.10	SPBC27.06c	psl1	mgr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923023366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755948	2540751	2541527	277273	278027	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC31A2.09c	psl1	apm4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.710496432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755949	2540751	2542189	277273	278664	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC17A5.09c	psl1	glc9	-	SPAC17A5.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.265879457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755950	2540751	2539129	277273	275701	SPBC20F10.10	SPCC338.14	psl1	ado1	-	SPCC338.14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036066748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755951	2540751	2543078	277273	279511	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC31A2.15c	psl1	dcc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.084112149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755952	2540751	2540415	277273	276943	SPBC20F10.10	SPBC30B4.06c	psl1	SPBC30B4.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.267181348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755953	2540751	2540825	277273	277343	SPBC20F10.10	SPBC428.08c	psl1	clr4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.203470106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755954	2540751	2540964	277273	277480	SPBC20F10.10	SPBC365.16	psl1	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574015186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755955	2540751	2539388	277273	275953	SPBC20F10.10	SPCC24B10.12	psl1	cgi121	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.612482703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755956	2540751	2543020	277273	279456	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC10F6.13c	psl1	SPAC10F6.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.329004259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755957	2540751	2539870	277273	276416	SPBC20F10.10	SPBC1709.18	psl1	tif452	-	SPBC409.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445124251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755958	2540751	2541649	277273	278145	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC1F3.06c	psl1	spo15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580303661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755959	2540751	2542513	277273	278971	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC1952.05	psl1	gcn5	-	kat2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.716218724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755960	2540751	2542464	277273	278925	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC1A6.09c	psl1	lag1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572912779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755961	2540751	2543208	277273	279637	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC328.04	psl1	SPAC328.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.910312896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755962	2540751	2541496	277273	277998	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC23D3.09	psl1	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.130042296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755963	2540751	2541166	277273	277681	SPBC20F10.10	SPBC725.15	psl1	ura5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.126645543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755964	2540751	2540801	277273	277320	SPBC20F10.10	SPBC18H10.10c	psl1	saf4	-	cwc16|cwf16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.951060638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755965	2540751	2542007	277273	278490	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC20H4.07	psl1	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.588983021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755966	2540751	2539974	277273	276518	SPBC20F10.10	SPBC32H8.07	psl1	git5	-	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152114857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755967	2540751	2541720	277273	278214	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC23H3.13c	psl1	gpa2	-	git8	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.40815148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755968	2540751	2543378	277273	279800	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC3H8.07c	psl1	pac10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200069818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755969	2540751	2541900	277273	278390	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC23H4.17c	psl1	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633429851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755970	2540751	2542519	277273	278977	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC19G12.08	psl1	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.071560063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755971	2540751	2540019	277273	276563	SPBC20F10.10	SPBC1685.01	psl1	pmp1	-	dsp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807016116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755972	2540751	2541464	277273	277966	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC222.08c	psl1	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.155098644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755973	2540751	2542597	277273	279051	SPBC20F10.10	SPAP8A3.07c	psl1	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.458044565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755974	2540751	2542242	277273	278713	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC18G6.04c	psl1	shm2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814758509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755975	2540751	2542329	277273	278795	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC9G1.10c	psl1	SPAC9G1.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.460477086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755976	2540751	2543009	277273	279447	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC10F6.06	psl1	vip1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.663987094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755977	2540751	2540643	277273	277168	SPBC20F10.10	SPBC19G7.06	psl1	mbx1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.900878108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755978	2540751	2541713	277273	278208	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC3A12.12	psl1	atp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.672910015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755979	2540751	2542725	277273	279176	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC3A12.10	psl1	rpl2001	-	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045350592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755980	2540751	2539842	277273	276390	SPBC20F10.10	SPBC14C8.15	psl1	SPBC14C8.15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870277968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755981	2540751	2542767	277273	279217	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC1565.07c	psl1	knd1	-	SPAC1565.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.495352696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755982	2540751	2541175	277273	277689	SPBC20F10.10	SPBC839.13c	psl1	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.970561938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755983	2540751	2540671	277273	277196	SPBC20F10.10	SPBC215.10	psl1	SPBC215.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989109499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755984	2540751	2543106	277273	279538	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC3A11.13	psl1	SPAC3A11.13	-	SPAC3H5.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.944299769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755985	2540751	2540498	277273	277026	SPBC20F10.10	SPBC27.02c	psl1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.922837851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755986	2540751	2539925	277273	276469	SPBC20F10.10	SPBC16H5.13	psl1	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.848795578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755987	2540751	2539013	277273	275586	SPBC20F10.10	SPCC364.03	psl1	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.87468661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755988	2540751	2539136	277273	275708	SPBC20F10.10	SPCC1919.05	psl1	SPCC1919.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.484211946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755989	2540751	2542418	277273	278881	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC1805.07c	psl1	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.018106217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755990	2540751	2541229	277273	277743	SPBC20F10.10	SPBC839.05c	psl1	rps1701	-	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.151728845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755991	2540751	2539928	277273	276472	SPBC20F10.10	SPBC1604.08c	psl1	imp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700506683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755992	2540751	2539170	277273	275741	SPBC20F10.10	SPCC306.02c	psl1	SPCC306.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.938962369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755993	2540751	2542442	277273	278904	SPBC20F10.10	SPACUNK12.02c	psl1	cmk1	-	CaMK-I|SPAC25D11.02C	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.262628449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755994	2540751	2540380	277273	276909	SPBC20F10.10	SPBC1A4.05	psl1	blt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.186297824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755995	2540751	2540140	277273	276677	SPBC20F10.10	SPBC16C6.08c	psl1	qcr6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57576784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755996	2540751	2539169	277273	275740	SPBC20F10.10	SPCC1235.11	psl1	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.196281646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755997	2540751	2539700	277273	276253	SPBC20F10.10	SPBC1685.15c	psl1	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.214628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755998	2540751	2541806	277273	278297	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC4G8.13c	psl1	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.510053432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
755999	2540751	2543387	277273	279809	SPBC20F10.10	SPAPB1E7.02c	psl1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.479374325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756000	2540751	2540734	277273	277257	SPBC20F10.10	SPBC19G7.09	psl1	ulp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706758228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756001	2543290	2543565	279715	279981	SPAC9E9.10c	SPAPB24D3.04c	cbh1	mag1	cbh	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81011062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756002	2543290	2538961	279715	275535	SPAC9E9.10c	SPCC285.14	cbh1	trs130	cbh	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509168285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756003	2543290	2540913	279715	277429	SPAC9E9.10c	SPBC56F2.08c	cbh1	SPBC56F2.08c	cbh	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.541790038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756004	2543290	2542502	279715	278960	SPAC9E9.10c	SPAC139.06	cbh1	hat1	cbh	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322914688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756005	2543290	2541374	279715	277885	SPAC9E9.10c	SPBPB10D8.06c	cbh1	SPBPB10D8.06c	cbh	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387391017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756006	2543290	2540455	279715	276983	SPAC9E9.10c	SPBC215.05	cbh1	gpd1	cbh	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324044232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756007	2543290	2540535	279715	277062	SPAC9E9.10c	SPBC215.01	cbh1	SPBC215.01	cbh	SPBC3B9.20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377505334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756008	2543290	2540425	279715	276953	SPAC9E9.10c	SPBC27.06c	cbh1	mgr2	cbh	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982632208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756009	2543290	2541428	279715	277933	SPAC9E9.10c	SPAC14C4.11	cbh1	SPAC14C4.11	cbh	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57337789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756010	2543290	2538715	279715	275299	SPAC9E9.10c	SPCC1223.05c	cbh1	rpl3702	cbh	rpl37|rpl37-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320968469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756011	2543290	2540348	279715	276877	SPAC9E9.10c	SPBC29A10.05	cbh1	exo1	cbh	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506571499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756012	2543290	2542297	279715	278764	SPAC9E9.10c	SPAC17H9.06c	cbh1	SPAC17H9.06c	cbh	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778075504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756013	2543290	2538841	279715	275422	SPAC9E9.10c	SPCC550.03c	cbh1	SPCC550.03c	cbh	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.557623297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756014	2543290	2542453	279715	278914	SPAC9E9.10c	SPAC186.01	cbh1	pfl9	cbh	SPAC186.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.572850328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756015	2543290	3361389	279715	280465	SPAC9E9.10c	SPAC977.13c	cbh1	SPAC977.13c	cbh	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.060597147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756016	2543290	2543136	279715	279568	SPAC9E9.10c	SPBC1348.07	cbh1	SPBC1348.07	cbh	SPAC1348.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.566701649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756017	2543290	2540304	279715	276834	SPAC9E9.10c	SPBC354.13	cbh1	rga6	cbh	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328084784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756018	2543290	2540699	279715	277223	SPAC9E9.10c	SPBC800.08	cbh1	gcd10	cbh	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.00528167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756019	2543290	2543439	279715	279859	SPAC9E9.10c	SPAPB1A10.13	cbh1	SPAPB1A10.13	cbh	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383045041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756020	2543290	2542222	279715	278695	SPAC9E9.10c	SPAC31G5.18c	cbh1	sde2	cbh	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331341887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756021	2543290	2542574	279715	279030	SPAC9E9.10c	SPAC186.05c	cbh1	SPAC186.05c	cbh	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.611066259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756022	2543290	2539170	279715	275741	SPAC9E9.10c	SPCC306.02c	cbh1	SPCC306.02c	cbh	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.914889874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756023	2543290	2542442	279715	278904	SPAC9E9.10c	SPACUNK12.02c	cbh1	cmk1	cbh	CaMK-I|SPAC25D11.02C	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.988946713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756024	2543290	2540380	279715	276909	SPAC9E9.10c	SPBC1A4.05	cbh1	blt1	cbh	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.76899143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756025	2543290	2539189	279715	275760	SPAC9E9.10c	SPCC1682.16	cbh1	rpt4	cbh	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.062300842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756026	2543290	2542716	279715	279169	SPAC9E9.10c	SPAC25H1.07	cbh1	emc1	cbh	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444775115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756027	2543290	2541806	279715	278297	SPAC9E9.10c	SPAC4G8.13c	cbh1	prz1	cbh	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635453869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756028	2543290	2542830	279715	279277	SPAC9E9.10c	SPAC57A10.08c	cbh1	SPAC57A10.08c	cbh	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645280795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756029	2543290	2539085	279715	275657	SPAC9E9.10c	SPCC285.15c	cbh1	rps2802	cbh	rps28|rps28-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386820282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756030	2543290	2541808	279715	278299	SPAC9E9.10c	SPAC22A12.14c	cbh1	SPAC22A12.14c	cbh	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329345094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756031	2543290	2543472	279715	279892	SPAC9E9.10c	SPAC959.04c	cbh1	omh6	cbh	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64813434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756032	2543290	2541297	279715	277809	SPAC9E9.10c	SPBC9B6.07	cbh1	nop52	cbh	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929560228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756033	2539260	2542895	275830	279339	SPCC285.11	SPAC13G6.10c	dsc5	asl1	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576473567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756034	2539260	2542291	275830	278759	SPCC285.11	SPAC17C9.08	dsc5	pnu1	ucp10	end1|nuc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.444198374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756035	2539260	2543637	275830	280051	SPCC285.11	SPAC3H8.02	dsc5	csr102	ucp10	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.455309484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756036	2539260	2543291	275830	279716	SPCC285.11	SPAC9E9.04	dsc5	SPAC9E9.04	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330312491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756037	2539260	2538977	275830	275551	SPCC285.11	SPCC1020.06c	dsc5	tal1	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.128741098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756038	2539260	2540995	275830	277511	SPCC285.11	SPBC337.16	dsc5	cho1	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326329161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756039	2539260	2539939	275830	276483	SPCC285.11	SPBC11G11.01	dsc5	fis1	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.37373031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756040	2539260	2541205	275830	277719	SPCC285.11	SPBC839.02	dsc5	SPBC839.02	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.282130439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756041	2539260	2540029	275830	276573	SPCC285.11	SPBC16A3.01	dsc5	spn3	ucp10	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.522969925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756042	2539260	2541503	275830	278005	SPCC285.11	SPAC22A12.01c	dsc5	pso2	ucp10	SPAC56F8.17c|snm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.027654507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756043	2539260	2540929	275830	277445	SPCC285.11	SPBC354.03	dsc5	swd3	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.739880264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756044	2539260	2541558	275830	278057	SPCC285.11	SPAC1F7.08	dsc5	fio1	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.554587244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756045	2539260	2540727	275830	277250	SPCC285.11	SPBC1921.03c	dsc5	mex67	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.399770175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756046	2539260	2541323	275830	277835	SPCC285.11	SPBP35G2.14	dsc5	SPBP35G2.14	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.691579713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756047	2539260	2541522	275830	278023	SPCC285.11	SPAC23E2.01	dsc5	fep1	ucp10	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.763238155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756048	2539260	2542554	275830	279011	SPCC285.11	SPAC1952.03	dsc5	otu2	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509311591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756049	2539260	2542568	275830	279024	SPCC285.11	SPAC1952.02	dsc5	tma23	ucp10	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.984631928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756050	2539260	2539098	275830	275670	SPCC285.11	SPCC24B10.18	dsc5	SPCC24B10.18	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.04693353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756051	2539260	2539051	275830	275624	SPCC285.11	SPCC1183.11	dsc5	msy1	ucp10	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.251033728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756052	2539260	2542950	275830	279390	SPCC285.11	SPAC12B10.03	dsc5	bun62	ucp10	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329133472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756053	2539260	2540363	275830	276892	SPCC285.11	SPBC2F12.09c	dsc5	atf21	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.121581041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756054	2539260	2542168	275830	278643	SPCC285.11	SPAC17A5.16	dsc5	ftp105	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709740596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756055	2539260	2542921	275830	279362	SPCC285.11	SPAC1093.01	dsc5	ppr5	ucp10	SPAC12B10.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.139729338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756056	2539260	2542357	275830	278822	SPCC285.11	SPAC1782.07	dsc5	qcr8	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.420429446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756057	2539260	2541532	275830	278032	SPCC285.11	SPAC2C4.15c	dsc5	ubx2	ucp10	ucp13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.926552337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756058	2539260	2542691	275830	279144	SPCC285.11	SPAC26H5.07c	dsc5	SPAC26H5.07c	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378476892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756059	2539260	2538837	275830	275418	SPCC285.11	SPCC4B3.03c	dsc5	SPCC4B3.03c	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.693021785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756060	2539260	2541595	275830	278092	SPCC285.11	SPAC1565.01	dsc5	SPAC1565.01	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.262929654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756061	2539260	2538841	275830	275422	SPCC285.11	SPCC550.03c	dsc5	SPCC550.03c	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.76084496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756062	2539260	2542549	275830	279006	SPCC285.11	SPAC19A8.11c	dsc5	SPAC19A8.11c	ucp10	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820855969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756063	2539260	2538708	275830	275292	SPCC285.11	SPCC594.01	dsc5	SPCC594.01	ucp10	SPCC736.16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.100128542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756064	2539260	2541708	275830	278203	SPCC285.11	SPAC31A2.02	dsc5	trm112	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.836454034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756065	2539260	2541296	275830	277808	SPCC285.11	SPBP8B7.06	dsc5	rpp201	ucp10	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.383244138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756066	2539260	2541680	275830	278176	SPCC285.11	SPAC22F8.09	dsc5	rrp16	ucp10	nop53	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.123267185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756067	2539260	2539421	275830	275986	SPCC285.11	SPCC794.11c	dsc5	ent3	ucp10	SPCC794.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5657114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756068	2539260	2542781	275830	279230	SPCC285.11	SPAC57A10.12c	dsc5	ura3	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703335455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756069	2539260	2540001	275830	276545	SPCC285.11	SPBC1289.13c	dsc5	gmh6	ucp10	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.864517631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756070	2539260	2542806	275830	279254	SPCC285.11	SPAC1610.01	dsc5	saf5	ucp10	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.85031306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756071	2539260	2541786	275830	278278	SPCC285.11	SPAC22F3.08c	dsc5	rok1	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447239355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756072	2539260	2541156	275830	277671	SPCC285.11	SPBC685.07c	dsc5	rpl2701	ucp10	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.061762236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756073	2539260	2538762	275830	275345	SPCC285.11	SPCC306.04c	dsc5	set1	ucp10	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.051333585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756074	2539260	2542767	275830	279217	SPCC285.11	SPAC1565.07c	dsc5	knd1	ucp10	SPAC1565.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.141184548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756075	2539260	2543071	275830	279504	SPCC285.11	SPAC3C7.06c	dsc5	pit1	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714163743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756076	2539260	2539137	275830	275709	SPCC285.11	SPCC1682.08c	dsc5	mcp2	ucp10	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.89274632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756077	2539260	2542881	275830	279326	SPCC285.11	SPAC13F5.03c	dsc5	gld1	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454797652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756078	2539260	2540800	275830	277319	SPCC285.11	SPBC409.20c	dsc5	psh3	ucp10	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.276895356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756079	2539260	2538962	275830	275536	SPCC285.11	SPCC965.13	dsc5	SPCC965.13	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.498598093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756080	2539260	2542306	275830	278773	SPCC285.11	SPAC29A4.11	dsc5	rga3	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.497200954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756081	2539260	2539013	275830	275586	SPCC285.11	SPCC364.03	dsc5	rpl1702	ucp10	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.867454661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756082	2539260	2540829	275830	277347	SPCC285.11	SPBC800.09	dsc5	sum2	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508385129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756083	2539260	2541404	275830	277913	SPCC285.11	SPBPB2B2.18	dsc5	SPBPB2B2.18	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.909615375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756084	2539260	2541380	275830	277891	SPCC285.11	SPBPB2B2.13	dsc5	gal1	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.494454311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756085	2539260	2543420	275830	279842	SPCC285.11	SPAC3H1.04c	dsc5	mdm31	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.192967643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756086	2539260	2542386	275830	278850	SPCC285.11	SPAC1805.01c	dsc5	ppk6	ucp10	SPAPJ736.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699884025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756087	2539260	2543525	275830	279943	SPCC285.11	SPAC4A8.14	dsc5	SPAC4A8.14	ucp10	prs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576739393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756088	2539260	2543380	275830	279802	SPCC285.11	SPAC4G9.16c	dsc5	rpl901	ucp10	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.691149605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756089	2539260	2540146	275830	276683	SPCC285.11	SPBC17A3.06	dsc5	SPBC17A3.06	ucp10	pi040	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.105780878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756090	2539260	2539189	275830	275760	SPCC285.11	SPCC1682.16	dsc5	rpt4	ucp10	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.435414517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756091	2539260	2541084	275830	277599	SPCC285.11	SPBC649.02	dsc5	rps1902	ucp10	rps19|rps19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.505220051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756092	2539260	2538792	275830	275373	SPCC285.11	SPCP1E11.10	dsc5	SPCP1E11.10	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.393360324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756093	2539260	2539169	275830	275740	SPCC285.11	SPCC1235.11	dsc5	mpc1	ucp10	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.265577889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756094	2539260	2541357	275830	277868	SPCC285.11	SPBPB7E8.01	dsc5	SPBPB7E8.01	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.916577386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756095	2539260	2541806	275830	278297	SPCC285.11	SPAC4G8.13c	dsc5	prz1	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.632561051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756096	2539260	2541774	275830	278268	SPCC285.11	SPAC22E12.05c	dsc5	rer1	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.19693681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756097	2539260	2543387	275830	279809	SPCC285.11	SPAPB1E7.02c	dsc5	mcl1	ucp10	slr3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979225673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756098	2539260	2543327	275830	279750	SPCC285.11	SPAC1D4.06c	dsc5	csk1	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.463020834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756099	2539260	2538947	275830	275521	SPCC285.11	SPCC1682.12c	dsc5	ubp16	ucp10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.81671348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756100	2539260	2543090	275830	279523	SPCC285.11	SPBC1348.01	dsc5	SPBC1348.01	ucp10	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.40739233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756101	2539260	2543448	275830	279868	SPCC285.11	SPAC3H5.07	dsc5	rpl702	ucp10	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.70979392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756102	2539260	2542617	275830	279071	SPCC285.11	SPAC13A11.01c	dsc5	rga8	ucp10	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773503923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756103	2539260	2542571	275830	279027	SPCC285.11	SPAC589.02c	dsc5	med13	ucp10	spTrap240|srb9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.283013222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756104	2539482	2543432	276045	279852	SPCC417.06c	SPAC4G8.05	mug27	ppk14	ppk35|slk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.851942665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756105	2539482	2542513	276045	278971	SPCC417.06c	SPAC1952.05	mug27	gcn5	ppk35|slk1	kat2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.12265587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756106	2539482	2542032	276045	278514	SPCC417.06c	SPAC23C11.04c	mug27	pnk1	ppk35|slk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.165318878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756107	2539482	2543304	276045	279728	SPCC417.06c	SPAC6B12.12	mug27	tom70	ppk35|slk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.169604692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756108	2539482	2541806	276045	278297	SPCC417.06c	SPAC4G8.13c	mug27	prz1	ppk35|slk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.918622199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756109	2539482	2543387	276045	279809	SPCC417.06c	SPAPB1E7.02c	mug27	mcl1	ppk35|slk1	slr3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.853060512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756110	2542086	2542177	278563	278652	SPAC25H1.02	SPAC17H9.08	jmj1	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703693195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756111	2542086	2543387	278563	279809	SPAC25H1.02	SPAPB1E7.02c	jmj1	mcl1	-	slr3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.923562793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756112	2542252	2541117	278722	277632	SPAC17A2.13c	SPBC646.13	rad25	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814207426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756113	2542252	2541205	278722	277719	SPAC17A2.13c	SPBC839.02	rad25	SPBC839.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.378630084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756114	2542252	2538801	278722	275382	SPAC17A2.13c	SPCC285.13c	rad25	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638543929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756115	2542252	2542022	278722	278505	SPAC17A2.13c	SPAC23A1.03	rad25	apt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707144824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756116	2542252	2538770	278722	275353	SPAC17A2.13c	SPCC1753.02c	rad25	git3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.812185105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756117	2542252	2541038	278722	277553	SPAC17A2.13c	SPBC29A10.01	rad25	ccr1	-	SPBC365.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808275916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756118	2542252	2542946	278722	279386	SPAC17A2.13c	SPAC6F12.03c	rad25	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.259683688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756119	2542252	2538841	278722	275422	SPAC17A2.13c	SPCC550.03c	rad25	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635007813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756120	2542252	2540374	278722	276903	SPAC17A2.13c	SPBC31F10.02	rad25	SPBC31F10.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980148264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756121	2542252	2541017	278722	277532	SPAC17A2.13c	SPBC36.07	rad25	elp1	-	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81543841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756122	2542252	2541628	278722	278124	SPAC17A2.13c	SPAC110.02	rad25	pds5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.14721736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756123	2542252	2539555	278722	276116	SPAC17A2.13c	SPCC4B3.08	rad25	lsg1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101165691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756124	2542252	2543670	278722	280084	SPAC17A2.13c	SPAPB1E7.06c	rad25	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.195278594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756125	2542252	2542881	278722	279326	SPAC17A2.13c	SPAC13F5.03c	rad25	gld1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864455606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756126	2542252	2540531	278722	277059	SPAC17A2.13c	SPBC23E6.08	rad25	sat1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.988287397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756127	2542252	2541675	278722	278171	SPAC17A2.13c	SPAC22F8.12c	rad25	shf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194651908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756128	2542252	2541806	278722	278297	SPAC17A2.13c	SPAC4G8.13c	rad25	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.542688842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756129	2542252	2541478	278722	277980	SPAC17A2.13c	SPAC2F7.17	rad25	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.342847469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756130	2540013	2540433	276557	276961	SPBC14C8.07c	SPBC2D10.06	cdc18	rep1	-	rec16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.062357034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756131	2540013	2539226	276557	275796	SPBC14C8.07c	SPCC16C4.20c	cdc18	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567738654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756132	2540013	2539420	276557	275985	SPBC14C8.07c	SPCC970.07c	cdc18	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.751567988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756133	2540013	2542260	276557	278729	SPBC14C8.07c	SPAC1F12.05	cdc18	SPAC1F12.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922381927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756134	2540013	2541658	276557	278154	SPBC14C8.07c	SPAC25B8.09	cdc18	SPAC25B8.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817051141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756135	2540013	2543510	276557	279928	SPBC14C8.07c	SPAC30D11.07	cdc18	nth1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810253139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756136	2540013	2541109	276557	277624	SPBC14C8.07c	SPBC6B1.02	cdc18	ppk30	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634200391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756137	2540013	2538769	276557	275352	SPBC14C8.07c	SPCC126.04c	cdc18	sgf73	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.190084186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756138	2540013	2539421	276557	275986	SPBC14C8.07c	SPCC794.11c	cdc18	ent3	-	SPCC794.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992410296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756139	2540013	2543051	276557	279486	SPBC14C8.07c	SPAC1071.08	cdc18	rpp203	-	rla6|rpp2-3|rpa2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.514261356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756140	2540013	2542883	276557	279328	SPBC14C8.07c	SPAC1486.04c	cdc18	alm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.687164037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756141	2540013	2540702	276557	277226	SPBC14C8.07c	SPBC19F8.03c	cdc18	yap18	-	SPBC19F8.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51574935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756142	2540013	2540977	276557	277493	SPBC14C8.07c	SPBC3E7.02c	cdc18	hsp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64097854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756143	2540013	2540345	276557	276874	SPBC14C8.07c	SPBC19C7.09c	cdc18	uve1	-	uvde	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579478364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756144	2540013	2543486	276557	279906	SPBC14C8.07c	SPAC959.07	cdc18	rps403	-	rps4|rps4-3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091086481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756145	2540013	2542423	276557	278885	SPBC14C8.07c	SPAC17G6.08	cdc18	pep7	-	vac1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922526321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756146	2540013	2541050	276557	277565	SPBC14C8.07c	SPBC428.05c	cdc18	arg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.408938703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756147	2540013	2539588	276557	276146	SPBC14C8.07c	SPCC962.04	cdc18	rps1201	-	rps12|rps12-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.550412753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756148	2540013	2540649	276557	277174	SPBC14C8.07c	SPBC19F8.08	cdc18	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573362683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756149	2540013	2540736	276557	277259	SPBC14C8.07c	SPBC19F8.02	cdc18	SPBC19F8.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572567996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756150	2541609	2541818	278106	278309	SPAC22F8.10c	SPAC11G7.02	sap145	pub1	SF3b145	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.124019853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756151	2541609	2539930	278106	276474	SPAC22F8.10c	SPBC1198.11c	sap145	reb1	SF3b145	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.113417211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756152	2541609	2541117	278106	277632	SPAC22F8.10c	SPBC646.13	sap145	sds23	SF3b145	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.128230681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756153	2541609	2541733	278106	278227	SPAC22F8.10c	SPAC27F1.03c	sap145	uch1	SF3b145	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636668149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756154	2541609	2539226	278106	275796	SPAC22F8.10c	SPCC16C4.20c	sap145	SPCC16C4.20c	SF3b145	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.651649201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756155	2541609	2540467	278106	276995	SPAC22F8.10c	SPBC2G2.07c	sap145	mug178	SF3b145	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929902779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756156	2541609	2543308	278106	279732	SPAC22F8.10c	SPAC694.04c	sap145	SPAC694.04c	SF3b145	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.988668032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756157	2541609	2542665	278106	279118	SPAC22F8.10c	SPAC10F6.08c	sap145	nht10	SF3b145	nht1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.304185259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756158	2541609	2541801	278106	278292	SPAC22F8.10c	SPAC2F7.08c	sap145	snf5	SF3b145	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.992956629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756159	2541609	2542983	278106	279421	SPAC22F8.10c	SPAC11D3.15	sap145	SPAC11D3.15	SF3b145	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.290706393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756160	2541609	2541496	278106	277998	SPAC22F8.10c	SPAC23D3.09	sap145	arp42	SF3b145	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574110194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756161	2541609	2542193	278106	278668	SPAC22F8.10c	SPAC9G1.11c	sap145	spn4	SF3b145	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.350737333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756162	2541609	2540318	278106	276848	SPAC22F8.10c	SPBC30B4.04c	sap145	sol1	SF3b145	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.260921588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756163	2541609	2538762	278106	275345	SPAC22F8.10c	SPCC306.04c	sap145	set1	SF3b145	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.751394094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756164	2539949	2542598	276493	279052	SPBC1703.04	SPAC6G10.08	mlh1	idp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.821037637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756165	2539949	2543681	276493	280095	SPBC1703.04	SPAC9.02c	mlh1	SPAC9.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200521311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756166	2539949	2542023	276493	278506	SPBC1703.04	SPAC20H4.10	mlh1	ufd2	-	SPAC145.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.11744582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756167	2539949	2542311	276493	278777	SPBC1703.04	SPAC16A10.05c	mlh1	dad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.437512495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756168	2539949	2541388	276493	277899	SPBC1703.04	SPBP8B7.30c	mlh1	thi5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.846008189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756169	2539949	2543117	276493	279549	SPBC1703.04	SPAC806.08c	mlh1	mod21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.352765298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756170	2539949	2541900	276493	278390	SPBC1703.04	SPAC23H4.17c	mlh1	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.885621207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756171	2539949	2541694	276493	278190	SPBC1703.04	SPAC1071.04c	mlh1	spc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813385287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756172	2539949	2541464	276493	277966	SPBC1703.04	SPAC222.08c	mlh1	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816459335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756173	2539949	2541378	276493	277889	SPBC1703.04	SPBP8B7.21	mlh1	ubp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441630839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756174	2539949	2539101	276493	275673	SPBC1703.04	SPCC736.04c	mlh1	gma12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.482880432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756175	2539949	2543304	276493	279728	SPBC1703.04	SPAC6B12.12	mlh1	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.249996899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756176	2539949	2542418	276493	278881	SPBC1703.04	SPAC1805.07c	mlh1	dad2	-	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.945254394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756177	2539949	2540064	276493	276602	SPBC1703.04	SPBC1718.02	mlh1	hop1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.186749766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756178	2539949	2540270	276493	276801	SPBC1703.04	SPBC2G2.02	mlh1	syj1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.74935619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756179	2539949	2541806	276493	278297	SPBC1703.04	SPAC4G8.13c	mlh1	prz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.553765548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756180	2540230	2539227	276762	275797	SPBC32F12.05c	SPCC191.11	cwf12	inv1	isy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.71790526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756181	2540230	2542902	276762	279346	SPBC32F12.05c	SPAC144.05	cwf12	SPAC144.05	isy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.322794558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756182	2540230	2541542	276762	278042	SPBC32F12.05c	SPAC4G9.02	cwf12	rnh201	isy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.550190666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756183	2540230	2539925	276762	276469	SPBC32F12.05c	SPBC16H5.13	cwf12	SPBC16H5.13	isy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.245647613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756184	2540230	2540464	276762	276992	SPBC32F12.05c	SPBC23E6.02	cwf12	rrp2	isy1	SPBC23E6.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.973161158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756185	2540230	2539998	276762	276542	SPBC32F12.05c	SPBC16G5.03	cwf12	SPBC16G5.03	isy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.691196841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756186	2539767	2539684	276318	276239	SPBC1703.06	SPBC16A3.16	pof10	SPBC16A3.16	-	cwc27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451968059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756187	2539767	2542747	276318	279197	SPBC1703.06	SPAC15A10.06	pof10	SPAC15A10.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.78362085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756188	2539767	2538922	276318	275499	SPBC1703.06	SPCC16C4.10	pof10	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.920051737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756189	2539767	2541323	276318	277835	SPBC1703.06	SPBP35G2.14	pof10	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.701824639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756190	2539767	2543319	276318	279743	SPBC1703.06	SPAC6B12.09	pof10	trm10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.836497938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756191	2539767	2541663	276318	278159	SPBC1703.06	SPAC22G7.08	pof10	ppk8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.946089732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756192	2539767	2539898	276318	276444	SPBC1703.06	SPBC12D12.07c	pof10	trx2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440295452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756193	2539767	2541451	276318	277956	SPBC1703.06	SPAC23G3.02c	pof10	sib1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.929277908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756194	2539767	2543301	276318	279726	SPBC1703.06	SPAC977.17	pof10	SPAC977.17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811161583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756195	2539767	2542597	276318	279051	SPBC1703.06	SPAP8A3.07c	pof10	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.187818455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756196	2539767	2542773	276318	279222	SPBC1703.06	SPAC16.01	pof10	rho2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.61693967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756197	2539767	2541186	276318	277700	SPBC1703.06	SPBC725.01	pof10	SPBC725.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.939151906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756198	2539767	2538762	276318	275345	SPBC1703.06	SPCC306.04c	pof10	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.581527233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756199	2539767	2538792	276318	275373	SPBC1703.06	SPCP1E11.10	pof10	SPCP1E11.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.844439302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756200	2542764	2542123	279214	278599	SPAC15E1.10	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC15E1.10	mal3	SPAP7G5.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924174051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756201	2542764	2540326	279214	276856	SPAC15E1.10	SPBC2G5.06c	SPAC15E1.10	hmt2	SPAP7G5.01	cad1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933116656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756202	2542764	2540967	279214	277483	SPAC15E1.10	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC15E1.10	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAP7G5.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.336447987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756203	2542102	2538939	278578	275514	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC1672.04c	spc34	SPCC1672.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.817134411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756204	2542102	2542518	278578	278976	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC1B3.16c	spc34	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.981023248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756205	2542102	2541426	278578	277931	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC227.06	spc34	SPAC227.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.543551916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756206	2542102	2543291	278578	279716	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC9E9.04	spc34	SPAC9E9.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632976332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756207	2542102	2542358	278578	278823	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC1782.09c	spc34	clp1	-	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.285990641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756208	2542102	2542378	278578	278842	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC1805.04	spc34	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.356949498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756209	2542102	2542237	278578	278709	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC19E9.02	spc34	fin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391960103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756210	2542102	3361561	278578	280637	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC11E3.01c	spc34	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842548719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756211	2542102	2541856	278578	278347	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC23H3.08c	spc34	bub3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.435513259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756212	2542102	2541117	278578	277632	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC646.13	spc34	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.754966832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756213	2542102	2539309	278578	275876	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC4G3.19	spc34	alp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.140999369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756214	2542102	2540664	278578	277189	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC215.02	spc34	bob1	-	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378626386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756215	2542102	3361436	278578	280512	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC1296.01c	spc34	SPAC1296.01c	-	SPAC22F3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.41673677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756216	2542102	2541361	278578	277872	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBP8B7.10c	spc34	utp16	-	SPBP8B7.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871864407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756217	2542102	2542468	278578	278929	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC1D4.09c	spc34	rtf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.231081101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756218	2542102	2539463	278578	276026	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC550.11	spc34	SPCC550.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.261419942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756219	2542102	2539434	278578	275997	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC757.09c	spc34	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.682280367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756220	2542102	2541026	278578	277541	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC337.09	spc34	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.368574604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756221	2542102	2540160	278578	276695	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC1773.17c	spc34	SPBC1773.17c	-	SPBP26C9.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813937627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756222	2542102	2542012	278578	278495	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC23C11.02c	spc34	rps23	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.909187099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756223	2542102	2540463	278578	276991	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC2F12.15c	spc34	pfa3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.701197936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756224	2542102	2540425	278578	276953	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC27.06c	spc34	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.059181385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756225	2542102	2542318	278578	278784	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC16C9.05	spc34	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.261629272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756226	2542102	2541560	278578	278059	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC24B11.12c	spc34	SPAC24B11.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.937401906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756227	2542102	2542277	278578	278746	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC17A5.02c	spc34	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781557577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756228	2542102	2541580	278578	278077	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC1687.05	spc34	pli1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.834445254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756229	2542102	2539244	278578	275814	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC1672.06c	spc34	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.093864935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756230	2542102	2543563	278578	279979	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC664.02c	spc34	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.457763422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756231	2542102	2543584	278578	279999	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAPB1E7.11c	spc34	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.058241776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756232	2542102	2543426	278578	279846	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC631.02	spc34	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.298730964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756233	2542102	2542640	278578	279094	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC9E9.12c	spc34	ybt1	-	abc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390938266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756234	2542102	2538906	278578	275483	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC1259.03	spc34	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.133391736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756235	2542102	2542981	278578	279419	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC824.02	spc34	bst1	-	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.399084062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756236	2542102	2540825	278578	277343	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC428.08c	spc34	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.70383443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756237	2542102	2541021	278578	277536	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC3B8.10c	spc34	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.646774166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756238	2542102	2542268	278578	278737	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC17A5.07c	spc34	ulp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.01277531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756239	2542102	2539467	278578	276030	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC417.07c	spc34	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380907222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756240	2542102	2543514	278578	279932	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC4D7.03	spc34	pop2	-	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.881369565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756241	2542102	2542679	278578	279132	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC12B10.07	spc34	acp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451047874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756242	2542102	2541664	278578	278160	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC2H10.01	spc34	SPAC2H10.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517328336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756243	2542102	2540797	278578	277316	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC18H10.11c	spc34	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636440983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756244	2542102	2541800	278578	278291	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC732.02c	spc34	SPAC732.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922605648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756245	2542102	2543445	278578	279865	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC4F10.13c	spc34	mpd2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.121560964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756246	2542102	2542463	278578	278924	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC1834.03c	spc34	hhf1	-	h4.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.621578292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756247	2542102	2541160	278578	277675	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC725.09c	spc34	hob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.496356416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756248	2542102	2538706	278578	275290	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC338.08	spc34	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.000130704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756249	2542102	2540396	278578	276924	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC31F10.12	spc34	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.199318643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756250	2542102	2542464	278578	278925	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC1A6.09c	spc34	lag1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773831125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756251	2542102	2538800	278578	275381	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC1322.06	spc34	kap113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.474760848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756252	2542102	2541578	278578	278075	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC25B8.05	spc34	deg1	-	SPAC25B8.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.415288617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756253	2542102	2539219	278578	275789	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC1795.01c	spc34	mad3	-	SPCC895.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.245125836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756254	2542102	2542817	278578	279264	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC13G6.02c	spc34	rps101	-	rps1-1|rps3a-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389448556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756255	2542102	2539857	278578	276404	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC1604.20c	spc34	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634583725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756256	2542102	2540231	278578	276763	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC336.14c	spc34	ppk26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.997422877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756257	2542102	2541710	278578	278205	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC343.11c	spc34	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.146611831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756258	2542102	2539667	278578	276222	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC13G1.08c	spc34	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.630821667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756259	2542102	2542126	278578	278602	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC1B3.05	spc34	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.911307582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756260	2542102	2542007	278578	278490	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC20H4.07	spc34	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.977746044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756261	2542102	2543244	278578	279672	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC6B12.06c	spc34	rrg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.464354028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756262	2542102	2540751	278578	277273	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC20F10.10	spc34	psl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.685337045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756263	2542102	2542976	278578	279414	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC9E9.09c	spc34	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.614391451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756264	2542102	2542431	278578	278893	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC1A6.01c	spc34	SPAC1A6.01c	-	SPAC23C4.20c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933744166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756265	2542102	2539408	278578	275973	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC576.12c	spc34	mhf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781345372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756266	2542102	2543443	278578	279863	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC3H1.12c	spc34	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570317231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756267	2542102	2540342	278578	276871	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC2G2.01c	spc34	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.686871713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756268	2542102	2543307	278578	279731	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC694.05c	spc34	rps2502	-	rps25|rps25-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.756733251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756269	2542102	2539847	278578	276395	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC530.14c	spc34	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325961012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756270	2542102	2540599	278578	277125	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC29A3.10c	spc34	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319632856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756271	2542102	2540229	278578	276761	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC31F10.15c	spc34	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.26843801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756272	2542102	2541927	278578	278415	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC222.12c	spc34	atp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.691368651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756273	2542102	2541488	278578	277990	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC227.17c	spc34	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.424523062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756274	2542102	2543477	278578	279897	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAPB2B4.04c	spc34	SPAPB2B4.04c	-	pmc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.213254177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756275	2542102	2543049	278578	279484	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC1296.04	spc34	mug65	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.326712219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756276	2542102	2541337	278578	277848	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBP35G2.13c	spc34	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.022317253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756277	2542102	2539527	278578	276089	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC338.16	spc34	pof3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.347265472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756278	2542102	2540589	278578	277115	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC20F10.06	spc34	mad2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.153868833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756279	2542102	3361520	278578	280596	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC1610.02c	spc34	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.631749591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756280	2542102	2541144	278578	277659	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC685.06	spc34	rps001	-	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319339421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756281	2542102	2539908	278578	276454	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC13E7.06	spc34	msd1	-	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381921432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756282	2542102	2539763	278578	276314	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC1861.05	spc34	SPBC1861.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.498225324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756283	2542102	2539160	278578	275732	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC18.17c	spc34	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.184867174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756284	2542102	2539354	278578	275920	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC4F11.03c	spc34	SPCC4F11.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.100574048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756285	2542102	3361389	278578	280465	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC977.13c	spc34	SPAC977.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392647174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756286	2542102	2541909	278578	278399	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC227.01c	spc34	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.916738808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756287	2542102	2543304	278578	279728	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC6B12.12	spc34	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.84467119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756288	2542102	2538966	278578	275540	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC18.10	spc34	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.439388168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756289	2542102	2540960	278578	277476	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC3D6.02	spc34	but2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.191195511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756290	2542102	2541432	278578	277937	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC1F5.05c	spc34	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.419361683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756291	2542102	2540089	278578	276627	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC32H8.01c	spc34	SPBC32H8.01c	-	SPBP22H7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.279582881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756292	2542102	2541531	278578	278031	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC25A8.01c	spc34	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.260538193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756293	2542102	2542418	278578	278881	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC1805.07c	spc34	dad2	-	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867227503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756294	2542102	2539729	278578	276281	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC11B10.07c	spc34	ivn1	-	pi004|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447644768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756295	2542102	2542826	278578	279273	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC13G6.09	spc34	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.777515736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756296	2542102	2539668	278578	276223	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC11B10.10c	spc34	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.075857763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756297	2542102	2540516	278578	277044	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC21C3.01c	spc34	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.913850786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756298	2542102	2540927	278578	277443	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC365.06	spc34	pmt3	-	smt3|ubl2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.323636815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756299	2542102	2543633	278578	280047	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC3H8.05c	spc34	mms1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.259424902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756300	2542102	2543046	278578	279481	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC3C7.10	spc34	pex13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.45767041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756301	2542102	2539205	278578	275775	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC4B3.15	spc34	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.260515866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756302	2542102	2542904	278578	279348	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC144.11	spc34	rps1102	-	rps11|rps11-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.119327458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756303	2542102	2538840	278578	275421	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC736.07c	spc34	SPCC736.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.052041059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756304	2542102	2539189	278578	275760	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC1682.16	spc34	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.997107761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756305	2542102	2542021	278578	278504	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAP14E8.02	spc34	tos4	-	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.547768649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756306	2542102	2542716	278578	279169	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC25H1.07	spc34	emc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.181858229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756307	2542102	2543277	278578	279705	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC1002.03c	spc34	gls2	-	gls2alpha	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.063981339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756308	2542102	2543387	278578	279809	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAPB1E7.02c	spc34	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.605105804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756309	2542102	2539588	278578	276146	SPAC8C9.17c	SPCC962.04	spc34	rps1201	-	rps12|rps12-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.839212452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756310	2542102	2542890	278578	279334	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC13G6.14	spc34	aps1	-	SPAC24B11.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923052467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756311	2542102	2542656	278578	279110	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC2E1P3.05c	spc34	SPAC2E1P3.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505716712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756312	2542102	2541272	278578	277786	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC947.03c	spc34	naa38	-	mak31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637426579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756313	2542102	2542617	278578	279071	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC13A11.01c	spc34	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.347540249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756314	2542102	2540320	278578	276850	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC3D6.04c	spc34	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.902588421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756315	2542102	2540649	278578	277174	SPAC8C9.17c	SPBC19F8.08	spc34	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317213798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756316	2539511	2542431	276073	278893	SPCC663.01c	SPAC1A6.01c	ekc1	SPAC1A6.01c	SPCC777.16c|eck1	SPAC23C4.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391843238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756317	2539511	2541614	276073	278111	SPCC663.01c	SPAC29A4.20	ekc1	elp3	SPCC777.16c|eck1	kat9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.516510398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756318	2539511	2543663	276073	280077	SPCC663.01c	SPAC644.07	ekc1	SPAC644.07	SPCC777.16c|eck1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.460458584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756319	2539511	2541156	276073	277671	SPCC663.01c	SPBC685.07c	ekc1	rpl2701	SPCC777.16c|eck1	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572016476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756320	2539511	2540677	276073	277202	SPCC663.01c	SPBC21B10.03c	ekc1	ath1	SPCC777.16c|eck1	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.846362598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756321	2539511	2541675	276073	278171	SPCC663.01c	SPAC22F8.12c	ekc1	shf1	SPCC777.16c|eck1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.996760697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756322	2540618	2539293	277144	275861	SPBC3D6.11c	SPCC553.08c	slx8	ria1	-	SPCC553.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.012313228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756323	2540913	2542207	277429	278682	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC56F2.08c	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.372231416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756324	2540913	2540060	277429	276598	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC106.01	SPBC56F2.08c	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509404695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756325	2540913	2542518	277429	278976	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC1B3.16c	SPBC56F2.08c	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.411815036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756326	2540913	2542390	277429	278854	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC6F6.11c	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC6F6.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195638607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756327	2540913	2541512	277429	278013	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC11E3.08c	SPBC56F2.08c	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844171489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756328	2540913	2541552	277429	278051	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC1142.08	SPBC56F2.08c	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.062377379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756329	2540913	2542358	277429	278823	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC56F2.08c	clp1	-	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.273610766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756330	2540913	2538993	277429	275567	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC162.12	SPBC56F2.08c	tco89	-	SPCC1753.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.973334098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756331	2540913	2541135	277429	277650	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC839.03c	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC839.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783008074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756332	2540913	2542237	277429	278709	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC56F2.08c	fin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.515465759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756333	2540913	2540068	277429	276606	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC1734.12c	SPBC56F2.08c	alg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.758066671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756334	2540913	2541117	277429	277632	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC646.13	SPBC56F2.08c	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388714113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756335	2540913	2540161	277429	276696	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC13E7.03c	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC13E7.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506818208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756336	2540913	2542502	277429	278960	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC139.06	SPBC56F2.08c	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389881421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756337	2540913	2542701	277429	279154	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC56F2.08c	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.183962338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756338	2540913	2538922	277429	275499	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.006628404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756339	2540913	2541208	277429	277722	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC887.04c	SPBC56F2.08c	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.188889962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756340	2540913	2542677	277429	279130	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC56F2.08c	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.552983316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756341	2540913	2538847	277429	275428	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC594.06c	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.99228901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756342	2540913	2541682	277429	278178	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC15F9.02	SPBC56F2.08c	seh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.199988842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756343	2540913	2539249	277429	275819	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC1450.05c	SPBC56F2.08c	rox3	-	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.750408514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756344	2540913	2542848	277429	279294	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC9G1.03c	SPBC56F2.08c	rpl3001	-	rpl30|rpl30-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.823291107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756345	2540913	2543453	277429	279873	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC3G9.03	SPBC56F2.08c	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.50656777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756346	2540913	2541026	277429	277541	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC337.09	SPBC56F2.08c	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.120326356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756347	2540913	2539117	277429	275689	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC74.06	SPBC56F2.08c	mak3	-	phk2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.016486593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756348	2540913	2541119	277429	277634	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC651.11c	SPBC56F2.08c	apm3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.900969675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756349	2540913	2542012	277429	278495	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC23C11.02c	SPBC56F2.08c	rps23	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.989710177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756350	2540913	2539988	277429	276532	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC1271.05c	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC1271.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043578241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756351	2540913	2541346	277429	277857	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC56F2.08c	ppm1	-	SPBP8B7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581653167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756352	2540913	2540727	277429	277250	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC1921.03c	SPBC56F2.08c	mex67	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.966619733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756353	2540913	2542318	277429	278784	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC56F2.08c	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.35703221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756354	2540913	2542277	277429	278746	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC56F2.08c	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.475045472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756355	2540913	2540851	277429	277368	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC4F6.04	SPBC56F2.08c	rpl2502	-	rpl23a-2|rpl25b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.501132702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756356	2540913	2543108	277429	279540	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC3A12.13c	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC3A12.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.272385984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756357	2540913	2543563	277429	279979	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC664.02c	SPBC56F2.08c	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.411198183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756358	2540913	2543584	277429	279999	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAPB1E7.11c	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.383124774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756359	2540913	2539381	277429	275947	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC1739.10	SPBC56F2.08c	mug33	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.31823277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756360	2540913	2541926	277429	278414	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC222.14c	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC222.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.388943972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756361	2540913	2543651	277429	280065	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC644.11c	SPBC56F2.08c	pkp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.300588711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756362	2540913	2542036	277429	278518	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC56F2.08c	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.112285693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756363	2540913	2539098	277429	275670	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC24B10.18	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC24B10.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.252253174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756364	2540913	2539388	277429	275953	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC24B10.12	SPBC56F2.08c	cgi121	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.131502972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756365	2540913	2543514	277429	279932	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC4D7.03	SPBC56F2.08c	pop2	-	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.565212724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756366	2540913	2542950	277429	279390	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC12B10.03	SPBC56F2.08c	bun62	-	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.997257542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756367	2540913	2543020	277429	279456	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC10F6.13c	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC10F6.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.316261312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756368	2540913	2541801	277429	278292	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC56F2.08c	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386102578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756369	2540913	2538715	277429	275299	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC1223.05c	SPBC56F2.08c	rpl3702	-	rpl37|rpl37-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.334257147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756370	2540913	2541250	277429	277764	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC8D2.17	SPBC56F2.08c	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.560678071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756371	2540913	2540892	277429	277408	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC530.01	SPBC56F2.08c	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.336818542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756372	2540913	2541800	277429	278291	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC732.02c	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC732.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.778150906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756373	2540913	2543144	277429	279576	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC3F10.05c	SPBC56F2.08c	mug113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.119237302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756374	2540913	2539733	277429	276285	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC56F2.08c	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.045668679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756375	2540913	2542660	277429	279113	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC328.03	SPBC56F2.08c	tps1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.895159168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756376	2540913	2540886	277429	277403	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC4F6.10	SPBC56F2.08c	vps901	-	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.137052914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756377	2540913	2542817	277429	279264	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC13G6.02c	SPBC56F2.08c	rps101	-	rps1-1|rps3a-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327290824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756378	2540913	2542469	277429	278930	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC56F2.08c	erg5	-	cyp61	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.804508001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756379	2540913	2543406	277429	279828	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC9.12c	SPBC56F2.08c	atp12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.133414888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756380	2540913	2542861	277429	279307	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC13G7.13c	SPBC56F2.08c	msa1	-	SPAC6C3.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.117984344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756381	2540913	2542032	277429	278514	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC56F2.08c	pnk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.061555303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756382	2540913	2540665	277429	277190	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC83.02c	SPBC56F2.08c	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.869930379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756383	2540913	2542710	277429	279163	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC750.08c	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.31893004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756384	2540913	2543244	277429	279672	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC6B12.06c	SPBC56F2.08c	rrg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.837383199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756385	2540913	2538945	277429	275519	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC1739.06c	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC1739.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.991686656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756386	2540913	2540751	277429	277273	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC20F10.10	SPBC56F2.08c	psl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.008082698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756387	2540913	2541720	277429	278214	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC23H3.13c	SPBC56F2.08c	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319740946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756388	2540913	2541900	277429	278390	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC56F2.08c	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.546222487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756389	2540913	2539481	277429	276044	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC622.16c	SPBC56F2.08c	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.606330715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756390	2540913	2540990	277429	277506	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC36B7.06c	SPBC56F2.08c	mug20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504662936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756391	2540913	2541708	277429	278203	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC31A2.02	SPBC56F2.08c	trm112	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.990970686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756392	2540913	2540342	277429	276871	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC2G2.01c	SPBC56F2.08c	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.274639284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756393	2540913	2540967	277429	277483	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.290478108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756394	2540913	2542597	277429	279051	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAP8A3.07c	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.950546914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756395	2540913	2539847	277429	276395	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC530.14c	SPBC56F2.08c	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388694238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756396	2540913	2540599	277429	277125	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC29A3.10c	SPBC56F2.08c	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197719305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756397	2540913	2541266	277429	277780	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBP16F5.05c	SPBC56F2.08c	yar1	-	SPBP16F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.499212185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756398	2540913	2539421	277429	275986	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC794.11c	SPBC56F2.08c	ent3	-	SPCC794.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.192979903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756399	2540913	2542255	277429	278725	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC57A7.08	SPBC56F2.08c	pzh1	-	phz1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.120794562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756400	2540913	2543011	277429	279449	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC10F6.11c	SPBC56F2.08c	atg17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.167091752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756401	2540913	2540930	277429	277446	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC354.10	SPBC56F2.08c	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.044403157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756402	2540913	2541713	277429	278208	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC56F2.08c	atp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.710936388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756403	2540913	2539908	277429	276454	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC13E7.06	SPBC56F2.08c	msd1	-	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.475370497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756404	2540913	2540910	277429	277426	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC577.02	SPBC56F2.08c	rpl3801	-	rpl38-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.986602394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756405	2540913	2542283	277429	278751	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC27F1.08	SPBC56F2.08c	pdt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.049619292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756406	2540913	2539160	277429	275732	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC18.17c	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.740876795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756407	2540913	2541156	277429	277671	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC685.07c	SPBC56F2.08c	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699024353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756408	2540913	2542759	277429	279209	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC9G1.07	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.191990077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756409	2540913	2539101	277429	275673	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC736.04c	SPBC56F2.08c	gma12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328368217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756410	2540913	2543275	277429	279703	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC1002.05c	SPBC56F2.08c	jmj2	-	kdm5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.886758457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756411	2540913	2542516	277429	278974	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC2F7.04	SPBC56F2.08c	pmc2	-	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.551174673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756412	2540913	2542327	277429	278793	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC16C9.06c	SPBC56F2.08c	upf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452655675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756413	2540913	2541175	277429	277689	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC839.13c	SPBC56F2.08c	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.588567845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756414	2540913	2543670	277429	280084	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC56F2.08c	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.008690119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756415	2540913	2541909	277429	278399	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC227.01c	SPBC56F2.08c	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.853026911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756416	2540913	2542883	277429	279328	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC56F2.08c	alm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.40632979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756417	2540913	2541100	277429	277615	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC651.04	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC651.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.179938593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756418	2540913	2541432	277429	277937	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC1F5.05c	SPBC56F2.08c	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.881237253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756419	2540913	2540115	277429	276652	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC1778.02	SPBC56F2.08c	rap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.345509372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756420	2540913	2541531	277429	278031	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC56F2.08c	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.861761965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756421	2540913	2539013	277429	275586	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC364.03	SPBC56F2.08c	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05760008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756422	2540913	2539136	277429	275708	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC1919.05	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC1919.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.48274005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756423	2540913	2541229	277429	277743	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC839.05c	SPBC56F2.08c	rps1701	-	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387493088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756424	2540913	2540555	277429	277082	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC56F2.08c	mcs2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.592411038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756425	2540913	2540422	277429	276950	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC27.08c	SPBC56F2.08c	sua1	-	SPBC28F2.01c|asp1|met3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.83834128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756426	2540913	2539205	277429	275775	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC56F2.08c	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.369894875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756427	2540913	3361511	277429	280587	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC23C4.08	SPBC56F2.08c	rho3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.701684339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756428	2540913	2540270	277429	276801	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC2G2.02	SPBC56F2.08c	syj1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.477339748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756429	2540913	2543380	277429	279802	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC4G9.16c	SPBC56F2.08c	rpl901	-	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.874950804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756430	2540913	2540146	277429	276683	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.738379647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756431	2540913	2539189	277429	275760	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC1682.16	SPBC56F2.08c	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.252341047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756432	2540913	2539178	277429	275749	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC1682.14	SPBC56F2.08c	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.537619145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756433	2540913	2540134	277429	276671	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC17A3.03c	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC17A3.03c	-	pi043	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.204363569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756434	2540913	2543337	277429	279760	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC959.08	SPBC56F2.08c	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.253717874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756435	2540913	2539169	277429	275740	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC1235.11	SPBC56F2.08c	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.202685819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756436	2540913	2542716	277429	279169	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC25H1.07	SPBC56F2.08c	emc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.937148269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756437	2540913	2541357	277429	277868	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBPB7E8.01	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBPB7E8.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.848653369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756438	2540913	2541709	277429	278204	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC3C7.02c	SPBC56F2.08c	pil2	-	SPAC3C7.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.398844877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756439	2540913	2543384	277429	279806	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC637.06	SPBC56F2.08c	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.366472314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756440	2540913	2541806	277429	278297	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC56F2.08c	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.235728417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756441	2540913	2542175	277429	278650	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC56F2.08c	mkh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.139459809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756442	2540913	2543448	277429	279868	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC3H5.07	SPBC56F2.08c	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.465769832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756443	2540913	2540383	277429	276912	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC31E1.02c	SPBC56F2.08c	pmr1	-	cps5|pgak2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.753445868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756444	2540913	2540309	277429	276839	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC21B10.13c	SPBC56F2.08c	yox1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317287587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756445	2540913	2543624	277429	280038	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC4D7.06c	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC4D7.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.318603164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756446	2540913	2542094	277429	278571	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC56F2.08c	rcd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.137893851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756447	2540913	2542617	277429	279071	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC13A11.01c	SPBC56F2.08c	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.568066523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756448	2540913	2542571	277429	279027	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC589.02c	SPBC56F2.08c	med13	-	spTrap240|srb9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392489333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756449	2540500	2539949	277028	276493	SPBC36B7.09	SPBC1703.04	gcn2	mlh1	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.026136746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756450	2540500	2542518	277028	278976	SPBC36B7.09	SPAC1B3.16c	gcn2	vht1	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.738732792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756451	2540500	2542358	277028	278823	SPBC36B7.09	SPAC1782.09c	gcn2	clp1	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443328092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756452	2540500	2541822	277028	278313	SPBC36B7.09	SPAC1F7.10	gcn2	SPAC1F7.10	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.385967852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756453	2540500	2542098	277028	278574	SPBC36B7.09	SPAC30D11.01c	gcn2	gto2	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	SPAC30D11.01c|SPAC56F8.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990624813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756454	2540500	2541345	277028	277856	SPBC36B7.09	SPBP35G2.07	gcn2	ilv1	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.620157653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756455	2540500	5802967	277028	858105	SPBC36B7.09	SPAC20G4.08	gcn2	pdc1	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	SPAC20G4.08|SPAC4F10.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713393882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756456	2540500	2541205	277028	277719	SPBC36B7.09	SPBC839.02	gcn2	SPBC839.02	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.458222905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756457	2540500	2540979	277028	277495	SPBC36B7.09	SPBC3H7.10	gcn2	elp6	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.882293987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756458	2540500	2542273	277028	278742	SPBC36B7.09	SPAC17H9.13c	gcn2	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.054425409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756459	2540500	2542689	277028	279142	SPBC36B7.09	SPAC29B12.04	gcn2	snz1	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.027178207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756460	2540500	2540340	277028	276869	SPBC36B7.09	SPBC2D10.15c	gcn2	pth1	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513058969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756461	2540500	2541938	277028	278425	SPBC36B7.09	SPAC8C9.16c	gcn2	mug63	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.254099251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756462	2540500	2542260	277028	278729	SPBC36B7.09	SPAC1F12.05	gcn2	SPAC1F12.05	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.399132905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756463	2540500	2543020	277028	279456	SPBC36B7.09	SPAC10F6.13c	gcn2	SPAC10F6.13c	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.130490104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756464	2540500	2542499	277028	278958	SPBC36B7.09	SPAC1F12.04c	gcn2	SPAC1F12.04c	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877995882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756465	2540500	2542707	277028	279160	SPBC36B7.09	SPAC25G10.03	gcn2	zip1	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.339472393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756466	2540500	2543283	277028	279709	SPBC36B7.09	SPAC6C3.04	gcn2	cit1	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771396744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756467	2540500	2542216	277028	278690	SPBC36B7.09	SPAC19A8.02	gcn2	SPAC19A8.02	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811042353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756468	2540500	2541929	277028	278417	SPBC36B7.09	SPAC23C4.12	gcn2	hhp2	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812029086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756469	2540500	2540831	277028	277349	SPBC36B7.09	SPBC428.02c	gcn2	eca39	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	SPBC582.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.936112277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756470	2540500	2542549	277028	279006	SPBC36B7.09	SPAC19A8.11c	gcn2	SPAC19A8.11c	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.833634798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756471	2540500	2541954	277028	278441	SPBC36B7.09	SPAC23C4.05c	gcn2	SPAC23C4.05c	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317416112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756472	2540500	2541464	277028	277966	SPBC36B7.09	SPAC222.08c	gcn2	SPAC222.08c	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2710077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756473	2540500	2541961	277028	278448	SPBC36B7.09	SPAC23C4.02	gcn2	crn1	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.502872781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756474	2540500	2542597	277028	279051	SPBC36B7.09	SPAP8A3.07c	gcn2	SPAP8A3.07c	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.695436767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756475	2540500	2539172	277028	275743	SPBC36B7.09	SPCC1020.08	gcn2	SPCC1020.08	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.049062721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756476	2540500	2542958	277028	279398	SPBC36B7.09	SPAC12G12.09	gcn2	SPAC12G12.09	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.231589463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756477	2540500	2541017	277028	277532	SPBC36B7.09	SPBC36.07	gcn2	elp1	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.880043199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756478	2540500	2541762	277028	278256	SPBC36B7.09	SPAC139.01c	gcn2	SPAC139.01c	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	SPAC955.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384569966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756479	2540500	2539354	277028	275920	SPBC36B7.09	SPCC4F11.03c	gcn2	SPCC4F11.03c	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.688687172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756480	2540500	2542516	277028	278974	SPBC36B7.09	SPAC2F7.04	gcn2	pmc2	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	med1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.272679209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756481	2540500	2540619	277028	277145	SPBC36B7.09	SPBC25H2.15	gcn2	SPBC25H2.15	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513742503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756482	2540500	2542883	277028	279328	SPBC36B7.09	SPAC1486.04c	gcn2	alm1	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.792049841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756483	2540500	2539770	277028	276321	SPBC36B7.09	SPBC1685.11	gcn2	rlp1	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.879027374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756484	2540500	2540531	277028	277059	SPBC36B7.09	SPBC23E6.08	gcn2	sat1	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.504764436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756485	2540500	2542727	277028	279177	SPBC36B7.09	SPAC26A3.02	gcn2	myh1	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	myh	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.878271073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756486	2540500	2539205	277028	275775	SPBC36B7.09	SPCC4B3.15	gcn2	mid1	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330118451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756487	2540500	2542159	277028	278635	SPBC36B7.09	SPAC1834.09	gcn2	mug51	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866936338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756488	2540500	2541869	277028	278359	SPBC36B7.09	SPAC22F3.13	gcn2	tsc1	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327899116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756489	2540500	2543333	277028	279756	SPBC36B7.09	SPAC694.02	gcn2	SPAC694.02	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924254472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756490	2540500	2540649	277028	277174	SPBC36B7.09	SPBC19F8.08	gcn2	rps401	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.186964698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756491	2539403	2539774	275968	276325	SPCC736.11	SPBC17A3.10	ago1	pas4	csp9	pi036	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.261018538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756492	2539403	2539050	275968	275623	SPCC736.11	SPCC11E10.08	ago1	rik1	csp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.132365963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756493	2539403	2540279	275968	276810	SPCC736.11	SPBC3B8.04c	ago1	SPBC3B8.04c	csp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930144043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756494	2539403	2538796	275968	275377	SPCC736.11	SPCC63.06	ago1	SPCC63.06	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.446951904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756495	2539403	2540060	275968	276598	SPCC736.11	SPBC106.01	ago1	mph1	csp9	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.031905828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756496	2539403	2543529	275968	279947	SPCC736.11	SPAC4C5.02c	ago1	ryh1	csp9	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.789958719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756497	2539403	2542585	275968	279040	SPCC736.11	SPAC31A2.13c	ago1	sft1	csp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.264884103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756498	2539403	2543637	275968	280051	SPCC736.11	SPAC3H8.02	ago1	csr102	csp9	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.431190027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756499	2539403	2543634	275968	280048	SPCC736.11	SPAC3H8.04	ago1	SPAC3H8.04	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.060301497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756500	2539403	2542372	275968	278836	SPCC736.11	SPAC1F3.03	ago1	SPAC1F3.03	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.509969344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756501	2539403	2542066	275968	278543	SPCC736.11	SPAC227.05	ago1	SPAC227.05	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.462793928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756502	2539403	2541912	275968	278402	SPCC736.11	SPAC222.16c	ago1	csn3	csp9	SPAC821.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.020900146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756503	2539403	2540131	275968	276668	SPCC736.11	SPBC1778.05c	ago1	SPBC1778.05c	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.985346494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756504	2539403	2540213	275968	276746	SPCC736.11	SPBC17D1.06	ago1	dbp3	csp9	SPCC17D1.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.568687427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756505	2539403	2541552	275968	278051	SPCC736.11	SPAC1142.08	ago1	fhl1	csp9	SPAC8C9.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.990011256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756506	2539403	2541650	275968	278146	SPCC736.11	SPAC14C4.12c	ago1	laf1	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.630221312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756507	2539403	2540528	275968	277056	SPCC736.11	SPBC18H10.04c	ago1	sce3	csp9	tif48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.770419293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756508	2539403	2541135	275968	277650	SPCC736.11	SPBC839.03c	ago1	SPBC839.03c	csp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03675899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756509	2539403	2542237	275968	278709	SPCC736.11	SPAC19E9.02	ago1	fin1	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.697473773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756510	2539403	2541130	275968	277645	SPCC736.11	SPBC776.11	ago1	rpl2801	csp9	rpl28-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.990487702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756511	2539403	2542443	275968	278905	SPCC736.11	SPAC17G6.13	ago1	slt1	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.399679152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756512	2539403	2541856	275968	278347	SPCC736.11	SPAC23H3.08c	ago1	bub3	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.31554498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756513	2539403	2539350	275968	275916	SPCC736.11	SPCC24B10.17	ago1	emp24	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.678976558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756514	2539403	2541117	275968	277632	SPCC736.11	SPBC646.13	ago1	sds23	csp9	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.688448846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756515	2539403	2541633	275968	278129	SPCC736.11	SPAC664.01c	ago1	swi6	csp9	SPAC824.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.454611898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756516	2539403	2540694	275968	277218	SPCC736.11	SPBC19C7.10	ago1	bqt4	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.074308254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756517	2539403	2542103	275968	278579	SPCC736.11	SPAC31G5.11	ago1	pac2	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638695303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756518	2539403	2539332	275968	275898	SPCC736.11	SPCPB1C11.01	ago1	amt1	csp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.923292455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756519	2539403	2540975	275968	277491	SPCC736.11	SPBC354.12	ago1	gpd3	csp9	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.585198839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756520	2539403	2542669	275968	279122	SPCC736.11	SPAC29B12.08	ago1	clr5	csp9	SPAC29B12.08	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.277726649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756521	2539403	2539249	275968	275819	SPCC736.11	SPCC1450.05c	ago1	rox3	csp9	med19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.283824223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756522	2539403	2540945	275968	277461	SPCC736.11	SPBC342.06c	ago1	rtt109	csp9	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.441069751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756523	2539403	2543453	275968	279873	SPCC736.11	SPAC3G9.03	ago1	rpl2301	csp9	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.041378423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756524	2539403	2539331	275968	275897	SPCC736.11	SPCC24B10.09	ago1	rps1702	csp9	rps17|rps17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.981687222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756525	2539403	2539117	275968	275689	SPCC736.11	SPCC74.06	ago1	mak3	csp9	phk2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702883805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756526	2539403	2539797	275968	276347	SPCC736.11	SPBC16G5.14c	ago1	rps3	csp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934991796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756527	2539403	2542335	275968	278801	SPCC736.11	SPAC16E8.12c	ago1	png3	csp9	SPAC16E8.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.725503216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756528	2539403	2540727	275968	277250	SPCC736.11	SPBC1921.03c	ago1	mex67	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.877237496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756529	2539403	2540425	275968	276953	SPCC736.11	SPBC27.06c	ago1	mgr2	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506314182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756530	2539403	2542180	275968	278655	SPCC736.11	SPAC589.07c	ago1	atg1801	csp9	atg18|atg18a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.318713396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756531	2539403	2539129	275968	275701	SPCC736.11	SPCC338.14	ago1	ado1	csp9	SPCC338.14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462141254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756532	2539403	2542141	275968	278617	SPCC736.11	SPAC17C9.05c	ago1	pmc3	csp9	med27|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097614183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756533	2539403	2543426	275968	279846	SPCC736.11	SPAC631.02	ago1	bdf2	csp9	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.451460909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756534	2539403	2539352	275968	275918	SPCC736.11	SPCC188.07	ago1	ccq1	csp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.678040007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756535	2539403	2540825	275968	277343	SPCC736.11	SPBC428.08c	ago1	clr4	csp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.795354782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756536	2539403	2542300	275968	278767	SPCC736.11	SPAC1687.22c	ago1	puf3	csp9	SPAC222.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.819200781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756537	2539403	2541021	275968	277536	SPCC736.11	SPBC3B8.10c	ago1	nem1	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.753880032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756538	2539403	2542665	275968	279118	SPCC736.11	SPAC10F6.08c	ago1	nht10	csp9	nht1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.50078364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756539	2539403	2542568	275968	279024	SPCC736.11	SPAC1952.02	ago1	tma23	csp9	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.371768711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756540	2539403	2541544	275968	278044	SPCC736.11	SPAC22G7.06c	ago1	ura1	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512302262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756541	2539403	2539098	275968	275670	SPCC736.11	SPCC24B10.18	ago1	SPCC24B10.18	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.477487127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756542	2539403	2542950	275968	279390	SPCC736.11	SPAC12B10.03	ago1	bun62	csp9	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645738129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756543	2539403	2539804	275968	276354	SPCC736.11	SPBC1105.11c	ago1	hht3	csp9	h3.3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815673087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756544	2539403	2542484	275968	278944	SPCC736.11	SPAC1A6.07	ago1	sle1	csp9	SPAC1A6.07|seg1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510547188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756545	2539403	2540892	275968	277408	SPCC736.11	SPBC530.01	ago1	gyp1	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.195331304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756546	2539403	2542646	275968	279100	SPCC736.11	SPAC11H11.05c	ago1	fta6	csp9	sma6	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.192263284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756547	2539403	2542707	275968	279160	SPCC736.11	SPAC25G10.03	ago1	zip1	csp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869341063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756548	2539403	2542249	275968	278719	SPCC736.11	SPAC30D11.14c	ago1	SPAC30D11.14c	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.934123373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756549	2539403	2538770	275968	275353	SPCC736.11	SPCC1753.02c	ago1	git3	csp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.805441322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756550	2539403	2540647	275968	277172	SPCC736.11	SPBC18H10.07	ago1	SPBC18H10.07	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.373149665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756551	2539403	2540429	275968	276957	SPCC736.11	SPBC29A10.07	ago1	pom152	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.246390251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756552	2539403	2542123	275968	278599	SPCC736.11	SPAC18G6.15	ago1	mal3	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.973309787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756553	2539403	2542544	275968	279001	SPCC736.11	SPAC18G6.10	ago1	lem2	csp9	heh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.260258835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756554	2539403	2542507	275968	278965	SPCC736.11	SPAC18G6.13	ago1	SPAC18G6.13	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.982280041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756555	2539403	2543412	275968	279834	SPCC736.11	SPAC637.07	ago1	moe1	csp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.015178863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756556	2539403	2539754	275968	276306	SPCC736.11	SPBC16C6.04	ago1	dbl6	csp9	SPBC16C6.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047280941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756557	2539403	2540150	275968	276687	SPCC736.11	SPBC16E9.14c	ago1	zrg17	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.76156943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756558	2539403	2541889	275968	278379	SPCC736.11	SPAC2F7.03c	ago1	pom1	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.810270976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756559	2539403	2542860	275968	279306	SPCC736.11	SPAC8C9.09c	ago1	mug129	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439649629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756560	2539403	2540772	275968	277292	SPCC736.11	SPBC216.04c	ago1	mxr2	csp9	SPBC216.04c|MsrB	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.567022354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756561	2539403	2543118	275968	279550	SPCC736.11	SPAC3G6.11	ago1	chl1	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.266018491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756562	2539403	2542857	275968	279303	SPCC736.11	SPAC144.06	ago1	apl5	csp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.524213469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756563	2539403	2538808	275968	275389	SPCC736.11	SPCPB16A4.05c	ago1	SPCPB16A4.05c	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635693386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756564	2539403	2543406	275968	279828	SPCC736.11	SPAC9.12c	ago1	atp12	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.614639818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756565	2539403	2540665	275968	277190	SPCC736.11	SPBC83.02c	ago1	rpl4302	csp9	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.838266172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756566	2539403	2539974	275968	276518	SPCC736.11	SPBC32H8.07	ago1	git5	csp9	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.657121761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756567	2539403	2541720	275968	278214	SPCC736.11	SPAC23H3.13c	ago1	gpa2	csp9	git8	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.109259477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756568	2539403	2540836	275968	277354	SPCC736.11	SPBC18H10.19	ago1	vps38	csp9	atg14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.919617065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756569	2539403	2540077	275968	276615	SPCC736.11	SPBC17D11.04c	ago1	nto1	csp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.512265178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756570	2539403	2543378	275968	279800	SPCC736.11	SPAC3H8.07c	ago1	pac10	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513703808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756571	2539403	2542254	275968	278724	SPCC736.11	SPAC30D11.04c	ago1	nup124	csp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.257468991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756572	2539403	2540374	275968	276903	SPCC736.11	SPBC31F10.02	ago1	SPBC31F10.02	csp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98720185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756573	2539403	2539408	275968	275973	SPCC736.11	SPCC576.12c	ago1	mhf2	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.652518415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756574	2539403	2543105	275968	279537	SPCC736.11	SPAC343.10	ago1	met11	csp9	mthfr2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046271622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756575	2539403	2539481	275968	276044	SPCC736.11	SPCC622.16c	ago1	epe1	csp9	kdm2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.516346448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756576	2539403	2541009	275968	277524	SPCC736.11	SPBC428.04	ago1	apq12	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.065150133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756577	2539403	2543119	275968	279551	SPCC736.11	SPAC3A11.07	ago1	nde2	csp9	SPAC3A11.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923803282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756578	2539403	2541536	275968	278036	SPCC736.11	SPAC1071.02	ago1	mms19	csp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.420848519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756579	2539403	2540201	275968	276734	SPCC736.11	SPBC13A2.04c	ago1	ptr2	csp9	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327737723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756580	2539403	2543307	275968	279731	SPCC736.11	SPAC694.05c	ago1	rps2502	csp9	rps25|rps25-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03768119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756581	2539403	2540967	275968	277483	SPCC736.11	SPBC36B7.08c	ago1	SPBC36B7.08c	csp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981142782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756582	2539403	2541266	275968	277780	SPCC736.11	SPBP16F5.05c	ago1	yar1	csp9	SPBP16F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.993491182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756583	2539403	2542255	275968	278725	SPCC736.11	SPAC57A7.08	ago1	pzh1	csp9	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384541402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756584	2539403	2539812	275968	276362	SPCC736.11	SPBC1347.02	ago1	fkbp39	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.280681739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756585	2539403	2543515	275968	279933	SPCC736.11	SPAC4F10.14c	ago1	btf3	csp9	btt1|egd1|nac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.007040871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756586	2539403	2540930	275968	277446	SPCC736.11	SPBC354.10	ago1	def1	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.191826681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756587	2539403	2542869	275968	279314	SPCC736.11	SPAC140.02	ago1	gar2	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.331017041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756588	2539403	2541762	275968	278256	SPCC736.11	SPAC139.01c	ago1	SPAC139.01c	csp9	SPAC955.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.76951834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756589	2539403	2541713	275968	278208	SPCC736.11	SPAC3A12.12	ago1	atp11	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.277869423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756590	2539403	2539908	275968	276454	SPCC736.11	SPBC13E7.06	ago1	msd1	csp9	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.836719997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756591	2539403	2542170	275968	278645	SPCC736.11	SPAC17G8.13c	ago1	mst2	csp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820295424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756592	2539403	2539706	275968	276259	SPCC736.11	SPBC16G5.13	ago1	ptf2	csp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.857295106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756593	2539403	2541786	275968	278278	SPCC736.11	SPAC22F3.08c	ago1	rok1	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.076175328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756594	2539403	2542516	275968	278974	SPCC736.11	SPAC2F7.04	ago1	pmc2	csp9	med1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099070016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756595	2539403	2540619	275968	277145	SPCC736.11	SPBC25H2.15	ago1	SPBC25H2.15	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.691723675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756596	2539403	2543670	275968	280084	SPCC736.11	SPAPB1E7.06c	ago1	eme1	csp9	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.457324436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756597	2539403	2540346	275968	276875	SPCC736.11	SPBC2F12.03c	ago1	ebs1	csp9	SPBC2F12.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869007224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756598	2539403	2541470	275968	277972	SPCC736.11	SPAPYUG7.04c	ago1	rpb9	csp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.668977541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756599	2539403	2541678	275968	278174	SPCC736.11	SPAP7G5.05	ago1	rpl1002	csp9	rpl10|rpl10-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.333294829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756600	2539403	2540325	275968	276855	SPCC736.11	SPBC21B10.10	ago1	rps402	csp9	rps4-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579854078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756601	2539403	2541229	275968	277743	SPCC736.11	SPBC839.05c	ago1	rps1701	csp9	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.35759405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756602	2539403	2540677	275968	277202	SPCC736.11	SPBC21B10.03c	ago1	ath1	csp9	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.43853582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756603	2539403	2542133	275968	278609	SPCC736.11	SPAC1687.19c	ago1	qtr1	csp9	SPAC1687.19c|qtrt1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.542166444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756604	2539403	2541789	275968	278281	SPCC736.11	SPAC23H4.08	ago1	iwr1	csp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.421935008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756605	2539403	2543633	275968	280047	SPCC736.11	SPAC3H8.05c	ago1	mms1	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381464544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756606	2539403	2540936	275968	277452	SPCC736.11	SPBC800.05c	ago1	atb2	csp9	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.75622477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756607	2539403	2539726	275968	276278	SPCC736.11	SPBC13E7.08c	ago1	leo1	csp9	SPBC13E7.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876291742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756608	2539403	2541941	275968	278428	SPCC736.11	SPAC20H4.03c	ago1	tfs1	csp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.208528015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756609	2539403	2541084	275968	277599	SPCC736.11	SPBC649.02	ago1	rps1902	csp9	rps19|rps19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.396662213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756610	2539403	2543337	275968	279760	SPCC736.11	SPAC959.08	ago1	rpl2102	csp9	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.082776867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756611	2539403	2543220	275968	279648	SPCC736.11	SPAPB21F2.02	ago1	SPAPB21F2.02	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713718167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756612	2539403	2539700	275968	276253	SPCC736.11	SPBC1685.15c	ago1	klp6	csp9	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.745376305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756613	2539403	2543384	275968	279806	SPCC736.11	SPAC637.06	ago1	gmh5	csp9	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.649784407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756614	2539403	2543327	275968	279750	SPCC736.11	SPAC1D4.06c	ago1	csk1	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256192873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756615	2539403	2543471	275968	279891	SPCC736.11	SPAC513.07	ago1	SPAC513.07	csp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991365087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756616	2539403	2541466	275968	277968	SPCC736.11	SPAC14C4.06c	ago1	nab2	csp9	SPAC14C4.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.871040301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756617	2539403	2538920	275968	275497	SPCC736.11	SPCC1840.05c	ago1	SPCC1840.05c	csp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.156147765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756618	2539403	2539085	275968	275657	SPCC736.11	SPCC285.15c	ago1	rps2802	csp9	rps28|rps28-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.043611102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756619	2539403	2541491	275968	277993	SPCC736.11	SPAC2C4.16c	ago1	rps801	csp9	rps8|rps8-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.626834272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756620	2539403	2543372	275968	279794	SPCC736.11	SPAPB1A10.09	ago1	ase1	csp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.175490235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756621	2539403	2543090	275968	279523	SPCC736.11	SPBC1348.01	ago1	SPBC1348.01	csp9	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.630090877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756622	2539403	2540309	275968	276839	SPCC736.11	SPBC21B10.13c	ago1	yox1	csp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.261634807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756623	2539403	2542561	275968	279017	SPCC736.11	SPAC31G5.17c	ago1	rps1001	csp9	rps10-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.88587985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756624	2539403	2540208	275968	276741	SPCC736.11	SPBC9B6.03	ago1	SPBC9B6.03	csp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.190449608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756625	2539403	2541062	275968	277577	SPCC736.11	SPBC660.11	ago1	tcg1	csp9	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.830234084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756626	2539403	2540787	275968	277306	SPCC736.11	SPBC1921.07c	ago1	sgf29	csp9	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926801094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756627	2539403	2540649	275968	277174	SPCC736.11	SPBC19F8.08	ago1	rps401	csp9	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.400014962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756628	2540753	2540125	277274	276662	SPBC211.02c	SPBC16C6.01c	cwf3	SPBC16C6.01c	syf1	SPBC543.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.144080657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756629	2541145	2539930	277660	276474	SPBC651.12c	SPBC1198.11c	dbl7	reb1	SPBC651.12c	SPBC660.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.889748129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756630	2541145	2543685	277660	280099	SPBC651.12c	SPAC3C7.03c	dbl7	rad55	SPBC651.12c	rhp55	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.125073486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756631	2541145	2541776	277660	278270	SPBC651.12c	SPAC23H3.05c	dbl7	swd1	SPBC651.12c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.944608464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756632	2541145	2543304	277660	279728	SPBC651.12c	SPAC6B12.12	dbl7	tom70	SPBC651.12c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.962478512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756633	2541145	2540122	277660	276659	SPBC651.12c	SPBC1778.03c	dbl7	SPBC1778.03c	SPBC651.12c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.937623521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756634	2541542	2543529	278042	279947	SPAC4G9.02	SPAC4C5.02c	rnh201	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.343603964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756635	2541542	2538922	278042	275499	SPAC4G9.02	SPCC16C4.10	rnh201	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.294072155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756636	2541542	2538775	278042	275357	SPAC4G9.02	SPCC23B6.05c	rnh201	ssb3	-	rpa3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.334848302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756637	2541542	2540220	278042	276753	SPAC4G9.02	SPBC337.03	rnh201	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.118801291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756638	2541542	2542969	278042	279409	SPAC4G9.02	SPAC4G8.10	rnh201	gos1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.881263325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756639	2541542	2542220	278042	278694	SPAC4G9.02	SPAC1A6.03c	rnh201	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.900116688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756640	2541542	2540352	278042	276881	SPAC4G9.02	SPBC215.03c	rnh201	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.801659588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756641	2541542	2540326	278042	276856	SPAC4G9.02	SPBC2G5.06c	rnh201	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582504674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756642	2541542	2542550	278042	279007	SPAC4G9.02	SPAC1B3.02c	rnh201	SPAC1B3.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.024454888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756643	2541542	2538762	278042	275345	SPAC4G9.02	SPCC306.04c	rnh201	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.888236779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756644	2541542	2543567	278042	279983	SPAC4G9.02	SPAC890.03	rnh201	ppk16	-	mug92	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.850688149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756645	2541542	2540498	278042	277026	SPAC4G9.02	SPBC27.02c	rnh201	ask1	-	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.800998562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756646	2541542	2543633	278042	280047	SPAC4G9.02	SPAC3H8.05c	rnh201	mms1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844981642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756647	2541542	2541806	278042	278297	SPAC4G9.02	SPAC4G8.13c	rnh201	prz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.031744988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756648	2541542	2538730	278042	275314	SPAC4G9.02	SPCC31H12.02c	rnh201	mug73	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86603476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756649	2541165	2543387	277680	279809	SPBC776.12c	SPAPB1E7.02c	hsk1	mcl1	cdc7	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.614391711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756650	2542761	2538806	279211	275387	SPAC1565.06c	SPCC1840.09	spg1	SPCC1840.09	sid3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978517505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756651	2542761	2542596	279211	279050	SPAC1565.06c	SPAC1B3.17	spg1	clr2	sid3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.343227402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756652	2542761	2540150	279211	276687	SPAC1565.06c	SPBC16E9.14c	spg1	zrg17	sid3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.710646247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756653	2542761	2542860	279211	279306	SPAC1565.06c	SPAC8C9.09c	spg1	mug129	sid3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.048161803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756654	2542761	2541909	279211	278399	SPAC1565.06c	SPAC227.01c	spg1	erd1	sid3	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.867410137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756655	2542761	2543337	279211	279760	SPAC1565.06c	SPAC959.08	spg1	rpl2102	sid3	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.386199317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756656	2542761	2543151	279211	279583	SPAC1565.06c	SPAC343.06c	spg1	SPAC343.06c	sid3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.989273601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756657	2542066	2540060	278543	276598	SPAC227.05	SPBC106.01	SPAC227.05	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.943949452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756658	2542066	2540235	278543	276767	SPAC227.05	SPBC336.13c	SPAC227.05	SPBC336.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.333440867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756659	2542066	2539156	278543	275728	SPAC227.05	SPCC1450.08c	SPAC227.05	wtf16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381399516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756660	2542066	2540686	278543	277211	SPAC227.05	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC227.05	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.730769273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756661	2542066	2539226	278543	275796	SPAC227.05	SPCC16C4.20c	SPAC227.05	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324394209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756662	2542066	2541026	278543	277541	SPAC227.05	SPBC337.09	SPAC227.05	erg28	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923824388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756663	2542066	2542555	278543	279012	SPAC227.05	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC227.05	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.612618899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756664	2542066	2541323	278543	277835	SPAC227.05	SPBP35G2.14	SPAC227.05	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.824151654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756665	2542066	2540851	278543	277368	SPAC227.05	SPBC4F6.04	SPAC227.05	rpl2502	-	rpl23a-2|rpl25b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926354309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756666	2542066	2538906	278543	275483	SPAC227.05	SPCC1259.03	SPAC227.05	rpa12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.810024732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756667	2542066	2542036	278543	278518	SPAC227.05	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC227.05	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.714226143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756668	2542066	2542513	278543	278971	SPAC227.05	SPAC1952.05	SPAC227.05	gcn5	-	kat2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455225039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756669	2542066	2541776	278543	278270	SPAC227.05	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC227.05	swd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.122829017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756670	2542066	2542863	278543	279309	SPAC227.05	SPAC13G7.04c	SPAC227.05	mac1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871863828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756671	2542066	2540338	278543	276867	SPAC227.05	SPBC2G2.13c	SPAC227.05	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.978919631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756672	2542066	2539733	278543	276285	SPAC227.05	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC227.05	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.165693357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756673	2542066	2541929	278543	278417	SPAC227.05	SPAC23C4.12	SPAC227.05	hhp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510689141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756674	2542066	2540326	278543	276856	SPAC227.05	SPBC2G5.06c	SPAC227.05	hmt2	-	cad1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811076987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756675	2542066	2540997	278543	277513	SPAC227.05	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC227.05	pof9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.940884257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756676	2542066	2540256	278543	276787	SPAC227.05	SPBC32F12.12c	SPAC227.05	SPBC32F12.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098135894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756677	2542066	2538982	278543	275556	SPAC227.05	SPCC1450.12	SPAC227.05	SPCC1450.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.505536555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756678	2542066	2541900	278543	278390	SPAC227.05	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC227.05	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.157325433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756679	2542066	2541694	278543	278190	SPAC227.05	SPAC1071.04c	SPAC227.05	spc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.195926626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756680	2542066	2539043	278543	275616	SPAC227.05	SPCC1235.08c	SPAC227.05	pdh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852624968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756681	2542066	2542597	278543	279051	SPAC227.05	SPAP8A3.07c	SPAC227.05	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816611172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756682	2542066	2541186	278543	277700	SPAC227.05	SPBC725.01	SPAC227.05	SPBC725.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511720528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756683	2542066	2540229	278543	276761	SPAC227.05	SPBC31F10.15c	SPAC227.05	atp15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.27083899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756684	2542066	2542875	278543	279320	SPAC227.05	SPAC13G7.02c	SPAC227.05	ssa1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380340094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756685	2542066	2539908	278543	276454	SPAC227.05	SPBC13E7.06	SPAC227.05	msd1	-	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.899304664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756686	2542066	2541175	278543	277689	SPAC227.05	SPBC839.13c	SPAC227.05	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.874753037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756687	2542066	2539925	278543	276469	SPAC227.05	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC227.05	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.406542229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756688	2542066	2543304	278543	279728	SPAC227.05	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC227.05	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.228166011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756689	2542066	2541531	278543	278031	SPAC227.05	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC227.05	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.550171448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756690	2542066	2542306	278543	278773	SPAC227.05	SPAC29A4.11	SPAC227.05	rga3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.749725441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756691	2542066	2542418	278543	278881	SPAC227.05	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC227.05	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.172916978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756692	2542066	2541229	278543	277743	SPAC227.05	SPBC839.05c	SPAC227.05	rps1701	-	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.330315794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756693	2542066	2542403	278543	278867	SPAC227.05	SPAC19A8.05c	SPAC227.05	sst4	-	vps27	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.559928827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756694	2542066	2539729	278543	276281	SPAC227.05	SPBC11B10.07c	SPAC227.05	ivn1	-	pi004|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326510076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756695	2542066	2539375	278543	275941	SPAC227.05	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC227.05	mug154	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.835072266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756696	2542066	2542716	278543	279169	SPAC227.05	SPAC25H1.07	SPAC227.05	emc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986868697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756697	2542066	2542424	278543	278886	SPAC227.05	SPAC1805.14	SPAC227.05	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.412806242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756698	2542066	2543372	278543	279794	SPAC227.05	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC227.05	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.284318686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756699	2542066	2543448	278543	279868	SPAC227.05	SPAC3H5.07	SPAC227.05	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196755726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756700	2542066	2543024	278543	279460	SPAC227.05	SPAC1039.02	SPAC227.05	SPAC1039.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379495488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756701	2542066	2540649	278543	277174	SPAC227.05	SPBC19F8.08	SPAC227.05	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095001739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756702	2539353	2540893	275919	277409	SPCC5E4.03c	SPBC543.10	taf5	get1	taf72	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.691293967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756703	2539353	2540836	275919	277354	SPCC5E4.03c	SPBC18H10.19	taf5	vps38	taf72	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.840590705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756704	2539353	2541531	275919	278031	SPCC5E4.03c	SPAC25A8.01c	taf5	fft3	taf72	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506802052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756705	2539353	2540699	275919	277223	SPCC5E4.03c	SPBC800.08	taf5	gcd10	taf72	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509671348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756706	2542498	2542555	278957	279012	SPACUNK4.16c	SPAC1952.06c	SPACUNK4.16c	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.914169857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756707	2542498	2542268	278957	278737	SPACUNK4.16c	SPAC17A5.07c	SPACUNK4.16c	ulp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.621936299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756708	2542498	2541746	278957	278240	SPACUNK4.16c	SPAC20G4.04c	SPACUNK4.16c	hus1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.552957106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756709	2541929	2542066	278417	278543	SPAC23C4.12	SPAC227.05	hhp2	SPAC227.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510689141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756710	2541929	2542358	278417	278823	SPAC23C4.12	SPAC1782.09c	hhp2	clp1	-	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.045176191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756711	2541929	2541082	278417	277597	SPAC23C4.12	SPBC577.11	hhp2	SPBC577.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81960778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756712	2541929	2539332	278417	275898	SPAC23C4.12	SPCPB1C11.01	hhp2	amt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.198046797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756713	2541929	2539420	278417	275985	SPAC23C4.12	SPCC970.07c	hhp2	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037611528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756714	2541929	2540825	278417	277343	SPAC23C4.12	SPBC428.08c	hhp2	clr4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.704567495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756715	2541929	2542568	278417	279024	SPAC23C4.12	SPAC1952.02	hhp2	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.456884312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756716	2541929	2541889	278417	278379	SPAC23C4.12	SPAC2F7.03c	hhp2	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507718317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756717	2541929	2541496	278417	277998	SPAC23C4.12	SPAC23D3.09	hhp2	arp42	-	arp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195817161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756718	2541929	2542032	278417	278514	SPAC23C4.12	SPAC23C11.04c	hhp2	pnk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.014110919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756719	2541929	2540533	278417	277061	SPAC23C4.12	SPBC29A10.16c	hhp2	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322140836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756720	2541929	2541614	278417	278111	SPAC23C4.12	SPAC29A4.20	hhp2	elp3	-	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.564143636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756721	2541929	2538848	278417	275429	SPAC23C4.12	SPCC613.12c	hhp2	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934020221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756722	2541929	2539101	278417	275673	SPAC23C4.12	SPCC736.04c	hhp2	gma12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.347802813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756723	2541929	2540800	278417	277319	SPAC23C4.12	SPBC409.20c	hhp2	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711769281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756724	2541929	2543304	278417	279728	SPAC23C4.12	SPAC6B12.12	hhp2	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.063268063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756725	2541929	2541372	278417	277883	SPAC23C4.12	SPBP8B7.28c	hhp2	stc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149258286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756726	2541929	2541789	278417	278281	SPAC23C4.12	SPAC23H4.08	hhp2	iwr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.307669839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756727	2541929	2542716	278417	279169	SPAC23C4.12	SPAC25H1.07	hhp2	emc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317513093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756728	2541929	2543387	278417	279809	SPAC23C4.12	SPAPB1E7.02c	hhp2	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.558082202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756729	2541929	2542617	278417	279071	SPAC23C4.12	SPAC13A11.01c	hhp2	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317654682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756730	2540389	2542050	276917	278529	SPBC31E1.03	SPAC212.02	hub1	SPAC212.02	ubl4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.516193014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756731	2540389	2541410	276917	277918	SPBC31E1.03	SPBPB2B2.17c	hub1	SPBPB2B2.17c	ubl4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773593283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756732	2543392	2540235	279814	276767	SPAC8F11.03	SPBC336.13c	msh3	SPBC336.13c	swi4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503002368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756733	2543392	2540863	279814	277380	SPAC8F11.03	SPBC56F2.03	msh3	SPBC56F2.03	swi4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.252775218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756734	2543392	2539420	279814	275985	SPAC8F11.03	SPCC970.07c	msh3	raf2	swi4	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387118374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756735	2543392	2542555	279814	279012	SPAC8F11.03	SPAC1952.06c	msh3	SPAC1952.06c	swi4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.123877249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756736	2543392	2542268	279814	278737	SPAC8F11.03	SPAC17A5.07c	msh3	ulp2	swi4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.023839188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756737	2543392	2542177	279814	278652	SPAC8F11.03	SPAC17H9.08	msh3	SPAC17H9.08	swi4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.917158946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756738	2543392	2542776	279814	279225	SPAC8F11.03	SPAC167.01	msh3	ire1	swi4	ppk4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767704973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756739	2543392	2541543	279814	278043	SPAC8F11.03	SPAC5H10.04	msh3	SPAC5H10.04	swi4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325101359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756740	2543392	2538880	279814	275459	SPAC8F11.03	SPCC1393.09c	msh3	SPCC1393.09c	swi4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.064455127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756741	2543392	2540107	279814	276644	SPAC8F11.03	SPBC106.08c	msh3	mug2	swi4	B13958-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714754481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756742	2543392	2538848	279814	275429	SPAC8F11.03	SPCC613.12c	msh3	raf1	swi4	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.350203302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756743	2543392	2540649	279814	277174	SPAC8F11.03	SPBC19F8.08	msh3	rps401	swi4	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643513845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756744	2543289	2539050	279714	275623	SPAC9E9.08	SPCC11E10.08	rad26	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389408679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756745	2543289	2541512	279714	278013	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC11E3.08c	rad26	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.804068567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756746	2543289	2541135	279714	277650	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC839.03c	rad26	SPBC839.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.261534612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756747	2543289	2543164	279714	279595	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC3G6.06c	rad26	rad2	-	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.950853464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756748	2543289	2538775	279714	275357	SPAC9E9.08	SPCC23B6.05c	rad26	ssb3	-	rpa3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.313296203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756749	2543289	2540945	279714	277461	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC342.06c	rad26	rtt109	-	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.88779076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756750	2543289	2541580	279714	278077	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC1687.05	rad26	pli1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.752643541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756751	2543289	2543563	279714	279979	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC664.02c	rad26	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512528723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756752	2543289	2541905	279714	278395	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC6G9.01c	rad26	SPAC6G9.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708417742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756753	2543289	2539352	279714	275918	SPAC9E9.08	SPCC188.07	rad26	ccq1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.192221225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756754	2543289	2542177	279714	278652	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC17H9.08	rad26	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813682734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756755	2543289	2543593	279714	280008	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC4G9.10	rad26	arg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386159168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756756	2543289	2540348	279714	276877	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC29A10.05	rad26	exo1	-	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325231251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756757	2543289	2540338	279714	276867	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC2G2.13c	rad26	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.074804015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756758	2543289	2541735	279714	278229	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC7D4.04	rad26	atg11	-	taf1|cvt9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389194716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756759	2543289	2542007	279714	278490	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC20H4.07	rad26	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.156683575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756760	2543289	2540533	279714	277061	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC29A10.16c	rad26	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.23100159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756761	2543289	2540930	279714	277446	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC354.10	rad26	def1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867738426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756762	2543289	2540691	279714	277216	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC20F10.05	rad26	nrl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.186756461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756763	2543289	2542453	279714	278914	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC186.01	rad26	pfl9	-	SPAC186.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581799616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756764	2543289	2538848	279714	275429	SPAC9E9.08	SPCC613.12c	rad26	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506645454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756765	2543289	2542869	279714	279314	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC140.02	rad26	gar2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989414159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756766	2543289	3361389	279714	280465	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC977.13c	rad26	SPAC977.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.960513944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756767	2543289	2539108	279714	275680	SPAC9E9.08	SPCC1223.02	rad26	nmt1	-	thi3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.146974157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756768	2543289	2542222	279714	278695	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC31G5.18c	rad26	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.869142678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756769	2543289	2539375	279714	275941	SPAC9E9.08	SPCC4G3.11	rad26	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640244759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756770	2543289	2543387	279714	279809	SPAC9E9.08	SPAPB1E7.02c	rad26	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.488942681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756771	2543289	2542886	279714	279331	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC1486.01	rad26	SPAC1486.01	-	sod2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783583962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756772	2539823	2542207	276373	278682	SPBC16A3.18	SPAC17H9.10c	cip1	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.707892236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756773	2539823	2541801	276373	278292	SPBC16A3.18	SPAC2F7.08c	cip1	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.466107697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756774	2539823	2539845	276373	276393	SPBC16A3.18	SPBC12C2.02c	cip1	ste20	-	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979741579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756775	2539823	2540396	276373	276924	SPBC16A3.18	SPBC31F10.12	cip1	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.612148448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756776	2539823	2542710	276373	279163	SPBC16A3.18	SPAC750.08c	cip1	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.776311295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756777	2539823	2543139	276373	279571	SPBC16A3.18	SPAC12G12.03	cip1	cip2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.208633491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756778	2539823	2538848	276373	275429	SPBC16A3.18	SPCC613.12c	cip1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.213697181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756779	2539823	2540115	276373	276652	SPBC16A3.18	SPBC1778.02	cip1	rap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.398990286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756780	2539823	2542826	276373	279273	SPBC16A3.18	SPAC13G6.09	cip1	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.118165009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756781	2539823	2541789	276373	278281	SPBC16A3.18	SPAC23H4.08	cip1	iwr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.461771233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756782	2539823	2540555	276373	277082	SPBC16A3.18	SPBP16F5.02	cip1	mcs2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.247514608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756783	2539823	2542943	276373	279384	SPBC16A3.18	SPBC1348.03	cip1	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.801685966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756784	2541071	2540235	277586	276767	SPBC582.05c	SPBC336.13c	brc1	SPBC336.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81584219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756785	2541071	2538775	277586	275357	SPBC582.05c	SPCC23B6.05c	brc1	ssb3	-	rpa3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.503433576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756786	2541071	2541643	277586	278139	SPBC582.05c	SPAC14C4.13	brc1	rad17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.029727972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756787	2541071	2538698	277586	275283	SPBC582.05c	SPCC1442.02	brc1	SPCC1442.02	-	SPCC1450.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.859451598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756788	2541071	2542558	277586	279014	SPBC582.05c	SPAC1952.07	brc1	rad1	-	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852768566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756789	2541071	2542239	277586	278711	SPBC582.05c	SPAC18G6.02c	brc1	chp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.560434412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756790	2541071	2542036	277586	278518	SPBC582.05c	SPAC23A1.19c	brc1	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.55987698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756791	2541071	2542863	277586	279309	SPBC582.05c	SPAC13G7.04c	brc1	mac1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45065969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756792	2541071	2540352	277586	276881	SPBC582.05c	SPBC215.03c	brc1	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.880167507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756793	2541071	2541096	277586	277611	SPBC582.05c	SPBC725.10	brc1	SPBC725.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.01562343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756794	2541071	2542032	277586	278514	SPBC582.05c	SPAC23C11.04c	brc1	pnk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.919358077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756795	2541071	2541694	277586	278190	SPBC582.05c	SPAC1071.04c	brc1	spc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.500931685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756796	2541071	2542597	277586	279051	SPBC582.05c	SPAP8A3.07c	brc1	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.558490573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756797	2541071	2539059	277586	275632	SPBC582.05c	SPCC737.06c	brc1	SPCC737.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037315716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756798	2541071	2540927	277586	277443	SPBC582.05c	SPBC365.06	brc1	pmt3	-	smt3|ubl2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.051828515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756799	2541071	2539205	277586	275775	SPBC582.05c	SPCC4B3.15	brc1	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512307513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756800	2541071	2541529	277586	278029	SPBC582.05c	SPAC1687.13c	brc1	csn5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635327631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756801	2542753	2542831	279203	279278	SPAC1687.09	SPAC20H4.08	SPAC1687.09	whi2	-	SPAC20H4.08|SPAC145.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.783341895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756802	2542753	2542614	279203	279068	SPAC1687.09	SPAC1399.04c	SPAC1687.09	SPAC1399.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.254378634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756803	2542753	2541042	279203	277557	SPAC1687.09	SPBC359.03c	SPAC1687.09	aat1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38251585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756804	2542753	2543375	279203	279797	SPAC1687.09	SPAC3H1.08c	SPAC1687.09	SPAC3H1.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.401661183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756805	2542753	2543411	279203	279833	SPAC1687.09	SPAPB1A10.10c	SPAC1687.09	ypt71	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.525911324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756806	2542753	2542329	279203	278795	SPAC1687.09	SPAC9G1.10c	SPAC1687.09	SPAC9G1.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.15474597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756807	2542753	2543427	279203	279847	SPAC1687.09	SPAPB1A10.15	SPAC1687.09	arv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.931549257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756808	2542753	3361517	279203	280593	SPAC1687.09	SPAP11E10.02c	SPAC1687.09	mam3	-	SPAPB1A10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.245258791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756809	2542753	2543374	279203	279796	SPAC1687.09	SPAPB1A10.08	SPAC1687.09	SPAPB1A10.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.312485094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756810	2542698	2539434	279151	275997	SPAC26H5.09c	SPCC757.09c	SPAC26H5.09c	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.345873817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756811	2542698	2541800	279151	278291	SPAC26H5.09c	SPAC732.02c	SPAC26H5.09c	SPAC732.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.092643311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756812	2542698	2540643	279151	277168	SPAC26H5.09c	SPBC19G7.06	SPAC26H5.09c	mbx1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.841905889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756813	2541912	2542598	278402	279052	SPAC222.16c	SPAC6G10.08	csn3	idp1	SPAC821.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.861677254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756814	2541912	2541512	278402	278013	SPAC222.16c	SPAC11E3.08c	csn3	nse6	SPAC821.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.451548548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756815	2541912	2540919	278402	277435	SPAC222.16c	SPBC543.07	csn3	pek1	SPAC821.02c	mkk1|skh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.45455228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756816	2541912	2541346	278402	277857	SPAC222.16c	SPBP8B7.08c	csn3	ppm1	SPAC821.02c	SPBP8B7.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.167397114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756817	2541912	3361456	278402	280532	SPAC222.16c	SPAC1142.03c	csn3	swi2	SPAC821.02c	SPAC17G6.20c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.066576924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756818	2541912	2540964	278402	277480	SPAC222.16c	SPBC365.16	csn3	SPBC365.16	SPAC821.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.867281624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756819	2541912	2539960	278402	276504	SPAC222.16c	SPBC15D4.15	csn3	pho2	SPAC821.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982873711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756820	2541912	2542513	278402	278971	SPAC222.16c	SPAC1952.05	csn3	gcn5	SPAC821.02c	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.982648256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756821	2541912	2538994	278402	275568	SPAC222.16c	SPCC553.01c	csn3	dbl2	SPAC821.02c	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.313638153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756822	2541912	2542902	278402	279346	SPAC222.16c	SPAC144.05	csn3	SPAC144.05	SPAC821.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.094167298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756823	2541912	2542007	278402	278490	SPAC222.16c	SPAC20H4.07	csn3	rad57	SPAC821.02c	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.980523515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756824	2541912	2541903	278402	278393	SPAC222.16c	SPAC22F8.05	csn3	SPAC22F8.05	SPAC821.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.066506064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756825	2541912	2540741	278402	277264	SPAC222.16c	SPBC83.05	csn3	SPBC83.05	SPAC821.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.880129265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756826	2541912	2540019	278402	276563	SPAC222.16c	SPBC1685.01	csn3	pmp1	SPAC821.02c	dsp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991945543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756827	2541912	2538690	278402	275275	SPAC222.16c	SPCC1393.05	csn3	ers1	SPAC821.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.297510989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756828	2541912	2541531	278402	278031	SPAC222.16c	SPAC25A8.01c	csn3	fft3	SPAC821.02c	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.855713369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756829	2541912	2542418	278402	278881	SPAC222.16c	SPAC1805.07c	csn3	dad2	SPAC821.02c	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.464843727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756830	2541912	2539375	278402	275941	SPAC222.16c	SPCC4G3.11	csn3	mug154	SPAC821.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.588129679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756831	2541912	2543387	278402	279809	SPAC222.16c	SPAPB1E7.02c	csn3	mcl1	SPAC821.02c	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.636747809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756832	2541903	2540060	278393	276598	SPAC22F8.05	SPBC106.01	SPAC22F8.05	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.993160265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756833	2541903	2538961	278393	275535	SPAC22F8.05	SPCC285.14	SPAC22F8.05	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.626415304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756834	2541903	2541912	278393	278402	SPAC22F8.05	SPAC222.16c	SPAC22F8.05	csn3	-	SPAC821.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.066506064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756835	2541903	2540686	278393	277211	SPAC22F8.05	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC22F8.05	bdc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2652468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756836	2541903	2542135	278393	278611	SPAC22F8.05	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC22F8.05	ubp8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.164704949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756837	2541903	2539804	278393	276354	SPAC22F8.05	SPBC1105.11c	SPAC22F8.05	hht3	-	h3.3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.839213733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756838	2541903	2540673	278393	277198	SPAC22F8.05	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC22F8.05	mug80	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.556765983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756839	2541903	2542983	278393	279421	SPAC22F8.05	SPAC11D3.15	SPAC22F8.05	SPAC11D3.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.389094159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756840	2541903	2541713	278393	278208	SPAC22F8.05	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC22F8.05	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.192428676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756841	2541903	2542170	278393	278645	SPAC22F8.05	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC22F8.05	mst2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.124748791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756842	2541903	2538717	278393	275301	SPAC22F8.05	SPCC1235.02	SPAC22F8.05	bio2	-	SPCC320.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632647912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756843	2541903	2539246	278393	275816	SPAC22F8.05	SPCC18.13	SPAC22F8.05	SPCC18.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.331006415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756844	2541903	2540558	278393	277085	SPAC22F8.05	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC22F8.05	clr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.194720964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756845	2541903	2540787	278393	277306	SPAC22F8.05	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC22F8.05	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.995542348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756846	2540689	2542895	277214	279339	SPBC428.06c	SPAC13G6.10c	rxt2	asl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.503773045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756847	2540689	2541902	277214	278392	SPBC428.06c	SPAC27E2.07	rxt2	pvg2	-	mug53	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.916628843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756848	2540689	2542598	277214	279052	SPBC428.06c	SPAC6G10.08	rxt2	idp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.897360337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756849	2540689	2542080	277214	278557	SPBC428.06c	SPAC27D7.03c	rxt2	mei2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.475147164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756850	2540689	2542585	277214	279040	SPBC428.06c	SPAC31A2.13c	rxt2	sft1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.058857505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756851	2540689	2542382	277214	278846	SPBC428.06c	SPAC6G10.06	rxt2	SPAC6G10.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.425299875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756852	2540689	2542143	277214	278619	SPBC428.06c	SPAC17C9.07	rxt2	alg8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.954082691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756853	2540689	2541512	277214	278013	SPBC428.06c	SPAC11E3.08c	rxt2	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.881952232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756854	2540689	2541570	277214	278067	SPBC428.06c	SPAC6G9.09c	rxt2	rpl2401	-	rpl24|rpl24-01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.15651763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756855	2540689	2543291	277214	279716	SPBC428.06c	SPAC9E9.04	rxt2	SPAC9E9.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979023725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756856	2540689	2543064	277214	279497	SPBC428.06c	SPAC3G6.01	rxt2	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.087270035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756857	2540689	2542787	277214	279236	SPBC428.06c	SPAC9G1.08c	rxt2	SPAC9G1.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.978836464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756858	2540689	2540524	277214	277052	SPBC428.06c	SPBC21B10.08c	rxt2	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440162908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756859	2540689	2540528	277214	277056	SPBC428.06c	SPBC18H10.04c	rxt2	sce3	-	tif48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987134766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756860	2540689	2543677	277214	280091	SPBC428.06c	SPAPB1E7.05	rxt2	gde1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.219236175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756861	2540689	2540068	277214	276606	SPBC428.06c	SPBC1734.12c	rxt2	alg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.063866941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756862	2540689	2541856	277214	278347	SPBC428.06c	SPAC23H3.08c	rxt2	bub3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.437813779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756863	2540689	5802967	277214	858105	SPBC428.06c	SPAC20G4.08	rxt2	pdc1	-	SPAC20G4.08|SPAC4F10.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.273059751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756864	2540689	2543479	277214	279899	SPBC428.06c	SPAC688.04c	rxt2	gst3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.723057437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756865	2540689	2543680	277214	280094	SPBC428.06c	SPAC4G9.20c	rxt2	SPAC4G9.20c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866069022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756866	2540689	2542614	277214	279068	SPBC428.06c	SPAC1399.04c	rxt2	SPAC1399.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811226307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756867	2540689	2540686	277214	277211	SPBC428.06c	SPBC21D10.10	rxt2	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.084319614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756868	2540689	2539201	277214	275772	SPBC428.06c	SPCC188.09c	rxt2	pfl4	-	SPCC188.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810690903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756869	2540689	2541771	277214	278265	SPBC428.06c	SPAC23H3.06	rxt2	apl6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.198451463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756870	2540689	2542103	277214	278579	SPBC428.06c	SPAC31G5.11	rxt2	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388990588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756871	2540689	2541457	277214	277960	SPBC428.06c	SPAC6G10.10c	rxt2	SPAC6G10.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.909364779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756872	2540689	2540491	277214	277019	SPBC428.06c	SPBC28E12.04	rxt2	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.155561506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756873	2540689	2540375	277214	276904	SPBC428.06c	SPBC2G2.06c	rxt2	apl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.111488791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756874	2540689	2539226	277214	275796	SPBC428.06c	SPCC16C4.20c	rxt2	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.289883786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756875	2540689	2541012	277214	277527	SPBC428.06c	SPBC3H7.12	rxt2	rav2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700260945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756876	2540689	2538847	277214	275428	SPBC428.06c	SPCC594.06c	rxt2	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.309463471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756877	2540689	2541058	277214	277573	SPBC428.06c	SPBC3H7.09	rxt2	erf2	-	mug142	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51207905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756878	2540689	2543518	277214	279936	SPBC428.06c	SPAC4F8.11	rxt2	SPAC4F8.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.91675925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756879	2540689	2538801	277214	275382	SPBC428.06c	SPCC285.13c	rxt2	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77934194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756880	2540689	2540945	277214	277461	SPBC428.06c	SPBC342.06c	rxt2	rtt109	-	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.133564777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756881	2540689	2543453	277214	279873	SPBC428.06c	SPAC3G9.03	rxt2	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.402667092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756882	2540689	2542627	277214	279081	SPBC428.06c	SPAC750.04c	rxt2	SPAC750.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.839873657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756883	2540689	2543030	277214	279466	SPBC428.06c	SPAC12B10.10	rxt2	nod1	-	SPAC12B10.10	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097808915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756884	2540689	2541119	277214	277634	SPBC428.06c	SPBC651.11c	rxt2	apm3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.199668275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756885	2540689	2540463	277214	276991	SPBC428.06c	SPBC2F12.15c	rxt2	pfa3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.268553634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756886	2540689	2540993	277214	277509	SPBC428.06c	SPBC342.01c	rxt2	alg6	-	SPBC3F6.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.003468251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756887	2540689	2543029	277214	279465	SPBC428.06c	SPAC11G7.01	rxt2	SPAC11G7.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.56118964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756888	2540689	2540425	277214	276953	SPBC428.06c	SPBC27.06c	rxt2	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.016389618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756889	2540689	2542318	277214	278784	SPBC428.06c	SPAC16C9.05	rxt2	cph1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.978578999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756890	2540689	2541960	277214	278447	SPBC428.06c	SPAC6G9.15c	rxt2	SPAC6G9.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.609801035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756891	2540689	2540595	277214	277121	SPBC428.06c	SPBC21C3.02c	rxt2	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.680830065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756892	2540689	2539822	277214	276372	SPBC428.06c	SPBC16G5.02c	rxt2	SPBC16G5.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579474402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756893	2540689	2543296	277214	279721	SPBC428.06c	SPAC9E9.03	rxt2	leu2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.324274171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756894	2540689	2542649	277214	279103	SPBC428.06c	SPAC24C9.14	rxt2	otu1	-	mug141	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706240457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756895	2540689	2542644	277214	279098	SPBC428.06c	SPAC24C9.16c	rxt2	cox8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.99616021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756896	2540689	2539244	277214	275814	SPBC428.06c	SPCC1672.06c	rxt2	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.656005829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756897	2540689	2543563	277214	279979	SPBC428.06c	SPAC664.02c	rxt2	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.269448174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756898	2540689	2543584	277214	279999	SPBC428.06c	SPAPB1E7.11c	rxt2	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.185386007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756899	2540689	2543426	277214	279846	SPBC428.06c	SPAC631.02	rxt2	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.327103523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756900	2540689	2541905	277214	278395	SPBC428.06c	SPAC6G9.01c	rxt2	SPAC6G9.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.974339185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756901	2540689	2539352	277214	275918	SPBC428.06c	SPCC188.07	rxt2	ccq1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.196113817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756902	2540689	2543078	277214	279511	SPBC428.06c	SPAC31A2.15c	rxt2	dcc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390580393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756903	2540689	2538906	277214	275483	SPBC428.06c	SPCC1259.03	rxt2	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.136587133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756904	2540689	2542981	277214	279419	SPBC428.06c	SPAC824.02	rxt2	bst1	-	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.112571762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756905	2540689	2541021	277214	277536	SPBC428.06c	SPBC3B8.10c	rxt2	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.555549618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756906	2540689	2542665	277214	279118	SPBC428.06c	SPAC10F6.08c	rxt2	nht10	-	nht1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.322775249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756907	2540689	2542331	277214	278797	SPBC428.06c	SPAC1834.05	rxt2	alg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379491305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756908	2540689	2542033	277214	278515	SPBC428.06c	SPAC2C4.09	rxt2	SPAC2C4.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810104942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756909	2540689	2539388	277214	275953	SPBC428.06c	SPCC24B10.12	rxt2	cgi121	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.821257606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756910	2540689	2542311	277214	278777	SPBC428.06c	SPAC16A10.05c	rxt2	dad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.882318494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756911	2540689	2539339	277214	275905	SPBC428.06c	SPCC1494.03	rxt2	arz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934368634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756912	2540689	2540797	277214	277316	SPBC428.06c	SPBC18H10.11c	rxt2	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.651559412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756913	2540689	2542484	277214	278944	SPBC428.06c	SPAC1A6.07	rxt2	sle1	-	SPAC1A6.07|seg1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635061549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756914	2540689	2541250	277214	277764	SPBC428.06c	SPBC8D2.17	rxt2	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.97147106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756915	2540689	2541288	277214	277801	SPBC428.06c	SPBP35G2.04c	rxt2	SPBP35G2.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.924633349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756916	2540689	2543144	277214	279576	SPBC428.06c	SPAC3F10.05c	rxt2	mug113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.737884709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756917	2540689	2542707	277214	279160	SPBC428.06c	SPAC25G10.03	rxt2	zip1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.281296107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756918	2540689	2543445	277214	279865	SPBC428.06c	SPAC4F10.13c	rxt2	mpd2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.06207676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756919	2540689	2542652	277214	279106	SPBC428.06c	SPAC1687.15	rxt2	gsk3	-	skp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.591324143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756920	2540689	2540338	277214	276867	SPBC428.06c	SPBC2G2.13c	rxt2	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.903340672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756921	2540689	2542544	277214	279001	SPBC428.06c	SPAC18G6.10	rxt2	lem2	-	heh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.693457636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756922	2540689	2542507	277214	278965	SPBC428.06c	SPAC18G6.13	rxt2	SPAC18G6.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042846183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756923	2540689	2540352	277214	276881	SPBC428.06c	SPBC215.03c	rxt2	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.654597338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756924	2540689	2539733	277214	276285	SPBC428.06c	SPBC16E9.12c	rxt2	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.069805041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756925	2540689	2539046	277214	275619	SPBC428.06c	SPCC1223.12c	rxt2	meu10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.054108001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756926	2540689	2541735	277214	278229	SPBC428.06c	SPAC7D4.04	rxt2	atg11	-	taf1|cvt9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.689451159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756927	2540689	2541435	277214	277940	SPBC428.06c	SPAC2E1P5.02c	rxt2	mug109	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.146811611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756928	2540689	2541096	277214	277611	SPBC428.06c	SPBC725.10	rxt2	SPBC725.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.720286632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756929	2540689	2543667	277214	280081	SPBC428.06c	SPAC4H3.02c	rxt2	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.764033807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756930	2540689	2543358	277214	279780	SPBC428.06c	SPAC688.10	rxt2	rev3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.931736447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756931	2540689	2543348	277214	279770	SPBC428.06c	SPAC688.13	rxt2	scn3	-	scn1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.26653854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756932	2540689	2543346	277214	279768	SPBC428.06c	SPAC688.14	rxt2	set13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.38383062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756933	2540689	2539857	277214	276404	SPBC428.06c	SPBC1604.20c	rxt2	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387051144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756934	2540689	2542651	277214	279105	SPBC428.06c	SPAC24C9.12c	rxt2	SPAC24C9.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.195509659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756935	2540689	2543643	277214	280057	SPBC428.06c	SPAC3G9.07c	rxt2	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.358702827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756936	2540689	2541899	277214	278389	SPBC428.06c	SPAC22E12.11c	rxt2	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.578792325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756937	2540689	2542857	277214	279303	SPBC428.06c	SPAC144.06	rxt2	apl5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.269003896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756938	2540689	2543250	277214	279678	SPBC428.06c	SPAC3G9.15c	rxt2	fcf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.421334423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756939	2540689	2543057	277214	279491	SPBC428.06c	SPAC694.03	rxt2	SPAC694.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098422638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756940	2540689	2541710	277214	278205	SPBC428.06c	SPAC343.11c	rxt2	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.063311906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756941	2540689	2543396	277214	279818	SPBC428.06c	SPAC4D7.11	rxt2	dsc4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.568767914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756942	2540689	2539667	277214	276222	SPBC428.06c	SPBC13G1.08c	rxt2	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.803401071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756943	2540689	2542528	277214	278986	SPBC428.06c	SPAC1B3.08	rxt2	SPAC1B3.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.048016641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756944	2540689	2541955	277214	278442	SPBC428.06c	SPAC5D6.04	rxt2	SPAC5D6.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.150607115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756945	2540689	2543178	277214	279608	SPBC428.06c	SPAC31G5.15	rxt2	psd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.131992047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756946	2540689	2541978	277214	278463	SPBC428.06c	SPAC6G9.12	rxt2	cfr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.976139422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756947	2540689	2540371	277214	276900	SPBC428.06c	SPBC36.11	rxt2	SPBC36.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567929257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756948	2540689	2540961	277214	277477	SPBC428.06c	SPBC36B7.03	rxt2	sec63	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317994312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756949	2540689	2539974	277214	276518	SPBC428.06c	SPBC32H8.07	rxt2	git5	-	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814495626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756950	2540689	2543357	277214	279779	SPBC428.06c	SPAC688.12c	rxt2	SPAC688.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.761571489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756951	2540689	2539958	277214	276502	SPBC428.06c	SPBC1718.07c	rxt2	zfs1	-	moc4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.625421736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756952	2540689	2542254	277214	278724	SPBC428.06c	SPAC30D11.04c	rxt2	nup124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.751334658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756953	2540689	2543234	277214	279662	SPBC428.06c	SPAC977.11	rxt2	SPAC977.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.878828915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756954	2540689	2543301	277214	279726	SPBC428.06c	SPAC977.17	rxt2	SPAC977.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.320997786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756955	2540689	2542549	277214	279006	SPBC428.06c	SPAC19A8.11c	rxt2	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.86969229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756956	2540689	2542519	277214	278977	SPBC428.06c	SPAC19G12.08	rxt2	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.761498869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756957	2540689	2543683	277214	280097	SPBC428.06c	SPAPB1E7.04c	rxt2	SPAPB1E7.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.114798552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756958	2540689	2542056	277214	278535	SPBC428.06c	SPAC6G9.14	rxt2	SPAC6G9.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327238457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756959	2540689	2539715	277214	276268	SPBC428.06c	SPBC1778.09	rxt2	SPBC1778.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714026797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756960	2540689	2542055	277214	278534	SPBC428.06c	SPAC6G9.03c	rxt2	mug183	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.124263507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756961	2540689	2542439	277214	278901	SPBC428.06c	SPAC17A5.08	rxt2	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.198062778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756962	2540689	2540990	277214	277506	SPBC428.06c	SPBC36B7.06c	rxt2	mug20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.316750292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756963	2540689	2543443	277214	279863	SPBC428.06c	SPAC3H1.12c	rxt2	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.492026018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756964	2540689	2543119	277214	279551	SPBC428.06c	SPAC3A11.07	rxt2	nde2	-	SPAC3A11.07	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568255781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756965	2540689	2541694	277214	278190	SPBC428.06c	SPAC1071.04c	rxt2	spc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979699782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756966	2540689	2542720	277214	279171	SPBC428.06c	SPAC25G10.05c	rxt2	his1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.519306282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756967	2540689	2542125	277214	278601	SPBC428.06c	SPAP8A3.03	rxt2	SPAP8A3.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.518228016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756968	2540689	2541708	277214	278203	SPBC428.06c	SPAC31A2.02	rxt2	trm112	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.924489925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756969	2540689	2541053	277214	277568	SPBC428.06c	SPBC56F2.10c	rxt2	alg5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.355289249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756970	2540689	2541479	277214	277981	SPBC428.06c	SPAC27F1.06c	rxt2	SPAC27F1.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.879738649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756971	2540689	2543517	277214	279935	SPBC428.06c	SPAC3G9.05	rxt2	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.362896756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756972	2540689	3361470	277214	280546	SPBC428.06c	SPAC3G9.01	rxt2	nsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.909098896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756973	2540689	2538884	277214	275462	SPBC428.06c	SPCC1393.08	rxt2	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.251161682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756974	2540689	2543411	277214	279833	SPBC428.06c	SPAPB1A10.10c	rxt2	ypt71	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817407129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756975	2540689	2543254	277214	279682	SPBC428.06c	SPAC1006.03c	rxt2	red1	-	iss3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.156976529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756976	2540689	2543515	277214	279933	SPBC428.06c	SPAC4F10.14c	rxt2	btf3	-	btt1|egd1|nac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573012907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756977	2540689	2541742	277214	278236	SPBC428.06c	SPAC22H10.09	rxt2	SPAC22H10.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.513818332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756978	2540689	2541963	277214	278449	SPBC428.06c	SPAC21E11.04	rxt2	aca1	-	ppr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.260949988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756979	2540689	2541628	277214	278124	SPBC428.06c	SPAC110.02	rxt2	pds5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.517415463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756980	2540689	2542725	277214	279176	SPBC428.06c	SPAC3A12.10	rxt2	rpl2001	-	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.933648885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756981	2540689	2540001	277214	276545	SPBC428.06c	SPBC1289.13c	rxt2	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.549069104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756982	2540689	2542170	277214	278645	SPBC428.06c	SPAC17G8.13c	rxt2	mst2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842766469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756983	2540689	2541670	277214	278166	SPBC428.06c	SPAC24H6.13	rxt2	SPAC24H6.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389940896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756984	2540689	2543113	277214	279545	SPBC428.06c	SPAC3F10.07c	rxt2	erf4	-	mug91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.564791343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756985	2540689	2539476	277214	276039	SPBC428.06c	SPCC364.04c	rxt2	coy1	-	SPCC364.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773129997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756986	2540689	2542992	277214	279430	SPBC428.06c	SPAC1071.09c	rxt2	SPAC1071.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.132825382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756987	2540689	2542619	277214	279073	SPBC428.06c	SPAC6G10.02c	rxt2	tea3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.10639052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756988	2540689	2539555	277214	276116	SPBC428.06c	SPCC4B3.08	rxt2	lsg1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.506899548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756989	2540689	2542327	277214	278793	SPBC428.06c	SPAC16C9.06c	rxt2	upf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.79615138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756990	2540689	2543670	277214	280084	SPBC428.06c	SPAPB1E7.06c	rxt2	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.421105547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756991	2540689	2541909	277214	278399	SPBC428.06c	SPAC227.01c	rxt2	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.540789345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756992	2540689	2541931	277214	278419	SPBC428.06c	SPAC6G9.16c	rxt2	SPAC6G9.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.338065013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756993	2540689	2540498	277214	277026	SPBC428.06c	SPBC27.02c	rxt2	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.618559293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756994	2540689	2542883	277214	279328	SPBC428.06c	SPAC1486.04c	rxt2	alm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.339130047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756995	2540689	2541973	277214	278458	SPBC428.06c	SPAC6G9.13c	rxt2	bqt1	-	mug23|rec26	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.608087048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756996	2540689	2543600	277214	280015	SPBC428.06c	SPAPB1A10.05	rxt2	SPAPB1A10.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5641665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756997	2540689	2540800	277214	277319	SPBC428.06c	SPBC409.20c	rxt2	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.769067169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756998	2540689	2538717	277214	275301	SPBC428.06c	SPCC1235.02	rxt2	bio2	-	SPCC320.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378813528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
756999	2540689	2540464	277214	276992	SPBC428.06c	SPBC23E6.02	rxt2	rrp2	-	SPBC23E6.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.878028259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757000	2540689	2540531	277214	277059	SPBC428.06c	SPBC23E6.08	rxt2	sat1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.548019156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757001	2540689	2542849	277214	279295	SPBC428.06c	SPAC144.14	rxt2	klp8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.806919176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757002	2540689	2538756	277214	275339	SPBC428.06c	SPCC1795.10c	rxt2	SPCC1795.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.045461414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757003	2540689	2539471	277214	276034	SPBC428.06c	SPCC576.14	rxt2	dph5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.262729504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757004	2540689	2541531	277214	278031	SPBC428.06c	SPAC25A8.01c	rxt2	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.372275687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757005	2540689	2543480	277214	279900	SPBC428.06c	SPAC688.03c	rxt2	SPAC688.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.061621082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757006	2540689	2542418	277214	278881	SPBC428.06c	SPAC1805.07c	rxt2	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.71482309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757007	2540689	2542326	277214	278792	SPBC428.06c	SPAC16C9.07	rxt2	pom2	-	SPAC2G11.01|mug189|ppk5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381318972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757008	2540689	2539514	277214	276076	SPBC428.06c	SPCC663.14c	rxt2	trp663	-	SPCC663.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928408684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757009	2540689	2543427	277214	279847	SPBC428.06c	SPAPB1A10.15	rxt2	arv1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866983725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757010	2540689	2542727	277214	279177	SPBC428.06c	SPAC26A3.02	rxt2	myh1	-	myh	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.397049802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757011	2540689	2543649	277214	280063	SPBC428.06c	SPAC3H5.11	rxt2	SPAC3H5.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509592581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757012	2540689	2542826	277214	279273	SPBC428.06c	SPAC13G6.09	rxt2	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.222527773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757013	2540689	2539668	277214	276223	SPBC428.06c	SPBC11B10.10c	rxt2	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574092459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757014	2540689	2540516	277214	277044	SPBC428.06c	SPBC21C3.01c	rxt2	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.087817691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757015	2540689	2542416	277214	278880	SPBC428.06c	SPAC589.03c	rxt2	SPAC589.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.504002077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757016	2540689	2540992	277214	277508	SPBC428.06c	SPBC342.05	rxt2	crb2	-	rhp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.557943549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757017	2540689	2539207	277214	275777	SPBC428.06c	SPCC285.09c	rxt2	cgs2	-	pde1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.570321986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757018	2540689	2539928	277214	276472	SPBC428.06c	SPBC1604.08c	rxt2	imp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388317395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757019	2540689	3361476	277214	280552	SPBC428.06c	SPAC16A10.04	rxt2	rho4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0114474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757020	2540689	2541757	277214	278251	SPBC428.06c	SPAC2F7.10	rxt2	akr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992068187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757021	2540689	2539205	277214	275775	SPBC428.06c	SPCC4B3.15	rxt2	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.341616385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757022	2540689	2539375	277214	275941	SPBC428.06c	SPCC4G3.11	rxt2	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.294426995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757023	2540689	2543380	277214	279802	SPBC428.06c	SPAC4G9.16c	rxt2	rpl901	-	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.62646607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757024	2540689	2539189	277214	275760	SPBC428.06c	SPCC1682.16	rxt2	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.131965902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757025	2540689	2541941	277214	278428	SPBC428.06c	SPAC20H4.03c	rxt2	tfs1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.872341587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757026	2540689	2542059	277214	278537	SPBC428.06c	SPAC328.06	rxt2	ubp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.214608856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757027	2540689	2543400	277214	279822	SPBC428.06c	SPAC3G9.11c	rxt2	SPAC3G9.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.641209261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757028	2540689	2541675	277214	278171	SPBC428.06c	SPAC22F8.12c	rxt2	shf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.690990932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757029	2540689	2543384	277214	279806	SPBC428.06c	SPAC637.06	rxt2	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.142344207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757030	2540689	2541806	277214	278297	SPBC428.06c	SPAC4G8.13c	rxt2	prz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987897766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757031	2540689	2543387	277214	279809	SPBC428.06c	SPAPB1E7.02c	rxt2	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.893924799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757032	2540689	2543327	277214	279750	SPBC428.06c	SPAC1D4.06c	rxt2	csk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815854269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757033	2540689	2542886	277214	279331	SPBC428.06c	SPAC1486.01	rxt2	SPAC1486.01	-	sod2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.339928689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757034	2540689	2543471	277214	279891	SPBC428.06c	SPAC513.07	rxt2	SPAC513.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.686204445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757035	2540689	2541472	277214	277974	SPBC428.06c	SPAC589.11	rxt2	pth4	-	mug82	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.12827986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757036	2540689	2542175	277214	278650	SPBC428.06c	SPAC1F3.02c	rxt2	mkh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091273919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757037	2540689	2542424	277214	278886	SPBC428.06c	SPAC1805.14	rxt2	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.151351775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757038	2540689	2543090	277214	279523	SPBC428.06c	SPBC1348.01	rxt2	SPBC1348.01	-	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.466127041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757039	2540689	2543448	277214	279868	SPBC428.06c	SPAC3H5.07	rxt2	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382569495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757040	2540689	2542656	277214	279110	SPBC428.06c	SPAC2E1P3.05c	rxt2	SPAC2E1P3.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.131958588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757041	2540689	2543646	277214	280060	SPBC428.06c	SPAC821.07c	rxt2	moc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.366714107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757042	2540689	2542617	277214	279071	SPBC428.06c	SPAC13A11.01c	rxt2	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771132879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757043	2540689	2542578	277214	279034	SPBC428.06c	SPAC18B11.09c	rxt2	SPAC18B11.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.459944729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757044	2540689	2542571	277214	279027	SPBC428.06c	SPAC589.02c	rxt2	med13	-	spTrap240|srb9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.989783014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757045	2540689	2543660	277214	280074	SPBC428.06c	SPAPB1E7.08c	rxt2	SPAPB1E7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.631749717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757046	2543414	2540105	279836	276642	SPAC630.10	SPBC106.04	SPAC630.10	ada1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814926475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757047	2543414	2541117	279836	277632	SPAC630.10	SPBC646.13	SPAC630.10	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.278084953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757048	2543414	2541408	279836	277916	SPAC630.10	SPBPB2B2.14c	SPAC630.10	SPBPB2B2.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.682544865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757049	2543414	2541013	279836	277528	SPAC630.10	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC630.10	far10	-	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.05170803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757050	2543414	2538847	279836	275428	SPAC630.10	SPCC594.06c	SPAC630.10	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.773522365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757051	2543414	2539937	279836	276481	SPAC630.10	SPBC1539.08	SPAC630.10	arf6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262908477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757052	2543414	2542568	279836	279024	SPAC630.10	SPAC1952.02	SPAC630.10	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.944274919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757053	2543414	2542695	279836	279148	SPAC630.10	SPAC12B10.09	SPAC630.10	pet801	-	SPAC12B10.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980107686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757054	2543414	2541892	279836	278382	SPAC630.10	SPAP27G11.02	SPAC630.10	SPAP27G11.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189244259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757055	2543414	2543510	279836	279928	SPAC630.10	SPAC30D11.07	SPAC630.10	nth1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513104241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757056	2543414	2539689	279836	276244	SPAC630.10	SPBC1861.03	SPAC630.10	mak10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711588112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757057	2543414	2542007	279836	278490	SPAC630.10	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC630.10	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.896404655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757058	2543414	2540967	279836	277483	SPAC630.10	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC630.10	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.343273034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757059	2543414	2542869	279836	279314	SPAC630.10	SPAC140.02	SPAC630.10	gar2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.134692827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757060	2543414	2541713	279836	278208	SPAC630.10	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC630.10	atp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.046379023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757061	2543414	2542881	279836	279326	SPAC630.10	SPAC13F5.03c	SPAC630.10	gld1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.617462356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757062	2543414	2542515	279836	278973	SPAC630.10	SPAC1952.09c	SPAC630.10	SPAC1952.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875302032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757063	2543414	2542541	279836	278998	SPAC630.10	SPAC1B3.03c	SPAC630.10	wis2	-	cyp5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992119327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757064	2543414	2540346	279836	276875	SPAC630.10	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC630.10	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.806006614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757065	2543414	2540211	279836	276744	SPAC630.10	SPBC947.15c	SPAC630.10	nde1	-	SPBC947.15c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447956688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757066	2543414	2542222	279836	278695	SPAC630.10	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC630.10	sde2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.412379664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757067	2543414	2539205	279836	275775	SPAC630.10	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC630.10	mid1	-	dmf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152456268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757068	2543414	2543387	279836	279809	SPAC630.10	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC630.10	mcl1	-	slr3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.763551903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757069	2543414	2540067	279836	276605	SPAC630.10	SPBC16H5.05c	SPAC630.10	cyp7	-	cwf27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8682456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757070	2540328	2539467	276858	276030	SPBC31F10.11c	SPCC417.07c	cwf4	mto1	syf3	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578196212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757071	2542126	2542207	278602	278682	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC17H9.10c	not3	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.073414631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757072	2542126	2538721	278602	275305	SPAC1B3.05	SPCC1494.10	not3	adn3	-	SPCC70.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.188889292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757073	2542126	2539405	278602	275970	SPAC1B3.05	SPCC553.03	not3	pex1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868897651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757074	2542126	2543617	278602	280031	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC4A8.10	not3	SPAC4A8.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.681790617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757075	2542126	2542585	278602	279040	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC31A2.13c	not3	sft1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040714259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757076	2542126	2541818	278602	278309	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC11G7.02	not3	pub1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807895997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757077	2542126	2542671	278602	279124	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC824.09c	not3	SPAC824.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.314052295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757078	2542126	2540524	278602	277052	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC21B10.08c	not3	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.914385186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757079	2542126	2543339	278602	279762	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC630.13c	not3	tsc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.662011473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757080	2542126	2538993	278602	275567	SPAC1B3.05	SPCC162.12	not3	tco89	-	SPCC1753.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3351452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757081	2542126	2542237	278602	278709	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC19E9.02	not3	fin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.18442076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757082	2542126	2539930	278602	276474	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC1198.11c	not3	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.078489945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757083	2542126	2538857	278602	275437	SPAC1B3.05	SPCC1442.05c	not3	SPCC1442.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81005384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757084	2542126	2541117	278602	277632	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC646.13	not3	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.74000084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757085	2542126	2541345	278602	277856	SPAC1B3.05	SPBP35G2.07	not3	ilv1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.14375494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757086	2542126	2542701	278602	279154	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC26H5.05	not3	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.348020733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757087	2542126	2540491	278602	277019	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC28E12.04	not3	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.075108424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757088	2542126	2540455	278602	276983	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC215.05	not3	gpd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.99231255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757089	2542126	2541086	278602	277601	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC685.04c	not3	aps2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929501782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757090	2542126	2541951	278602	278438	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC222.05c	not3	mss1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090430661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757091	2542126	2541208	278602	277722	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC887.04c	not3	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.021993024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757092	2542126	2541012	278602	277527	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC3H7.12	not3	rav2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926211254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757093	2542126	2541471	278602	277973	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC1F5.03c	not3	SPAC1F5.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579438742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757094	2542126	2539510	278602	276072	SPAC1B3.05	SPCC4G3.04c	not3	coq5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.691497182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757095	2542126	2543681	278602	280095	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC9.02c	not3	SPAC9.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.937040858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757096	2542126	2542724	278602	279175	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC767.01c	not3	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325176298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757097	2542126	3361381	278602	280457	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC12G12.01c	not3	SPAC12G12.01c	-	SPAC630.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194903193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757098	2542126	2541346	278602	277857	SPAC1B3.05	SPBP8B7.08c	not3	ppm1	-	SPBP8B7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.205281683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757099	2542126	2540993	278602	277509	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC342.01c	not3	alg6	-	SPBC3F6.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378505596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757100	2542126	2540727	278602	277250	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC1921.03c	not3	mex67	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.475288307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757101	2542126	2542022	278602	278505	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC23A1.03	not3	apt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.412249121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757102	2542126	2540425	278602	276953	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC27.06c	not3	mgr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.925605741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757103	2542126	2539365	278602	275931	SPAC1B3.05	SPCC24B10.16c	not3	SPCC24B10.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047969367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757104	2542126	2542969	278602	279409	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC4G8.10	not3	gos1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820691546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757105	2542126	2542277	278602	278746	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC17A5.02c	not3	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.374728113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757106	2542126	2540467	278602	276995	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC2G2.07c	not3	mug178	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.610378081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757107	2542126	2543308	278602	279732	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC694.04c	not3	SPAC694.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.697181877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757108	2542126	2541311	278602	277823	SPAC1B3.05	SPBP8B7.09c	not3	los1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.804298047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757109	2542126	2539525	278602	276087	SPAC1B3.05	SPCC613.01	not3	SPCC613.01	-	SPCC757.14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865540222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757110	2542126	2539961	278602	276505	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC1198.09	not3	ubc16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568260862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757111	2542126	2543563	278602	279979	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC664.02c	not3	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.589657505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757112	2542126	2540415	278602	276943	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC30B4.06c	not3	SPBC30B4.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.567790708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757113	2542126	2538700	278602	275285	SPAC1B3.05	SPCC645.13	not3	SPCC645.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.049044833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757114	2542126	2538906	278602	275483	SPAC1B3.05	SPCC1259.03	not3	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.893956616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757115	2542126	2541926	278602	278414	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC222.14c	not3	SPAC222.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.27048389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757116	2542126	2541021	278602	277536	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC3B8.10c	not3	nem1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.564433592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757117	2542126	2540964	278602	277480	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC365.16	not3	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509776778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757118	2542126	2542311	278602	278777	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC16A10.05c	not3	dad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.573811957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757119	2542126	2543020	278602	279456	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC10F6.13c	not3	SPAC10F6.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706313096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757120	2542126	2540797	278602	277316	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC18H10.11c	not3	ppr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.558743146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757121	2542126	2541392	278602	277902	SPAC1B3.05	SPBPB10D8.04c	not3	SPBPB10D8.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929871535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757122	2542126	2541249	278602	277763	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC947.01	not3	alf1	-	SPBC947.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.630371278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757123	2542126	2541776	278602	278270	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC23H3.05c	not3	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77720771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757124	2542126	2543483	278602	279903	SPAC1B3.05	SPAPB2B4.02	not3	grx5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.259206062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757125	2542126	2538811	278602	275392	SPAC1B3.05	SPCC330.03c	not3	SPCC330.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452219494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757126	2542126	2540338	278602	276867	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC2G2.13c	not3	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.500994049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757127	2542126	2540352	278602	276881	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC215.03c	not3	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.475054015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757128	2542126	2539733	278602	276285	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC16E9.12c	not3	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.488888003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757129	2542126	2540673	278602	277198	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC1D7.03	not3	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.898088775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757130	2542126	2540150	278602	276687	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC16E9.14c	not3	zrg17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.97188738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757131	2542126	2541889	278602	278379	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC2F7.03c	not3	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.005802003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757132	2542126	2541578	278602	278075	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC25B8.05	not3	deg1	-	SPAC25B8.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041236051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757133	2542126	2542469	278602	278930	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC19A8.04	not3	erg5	-	cyp61	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.343959149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757134	2542126	2541496	278602	277998	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC23D3.09	not3	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.749539887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757135	2542126	2539603	278602	276161	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC1289.06c	not3	ppr8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.53809905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757136	2542126	2543406	278602	279828	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC9.12c	not3	atp12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807546735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757137	2542126	2540326	278602	276856	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC2G5.06c	not3	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.048894925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757138	2542126	2540997	278602	277513	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC3H7.06c	not3	pof9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.93021623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757139	2542126	2538945	278602	275519	SPAC1B3.05	SPCC1739.06c	not3	SPCC1739.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86780978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757140	2542126	2539974	278602	276518	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC32H8.07	not3	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713391838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757141	2542126	2540394	278602	276922	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC2D10.09	not3	snr1	-	SPBC2D10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.537916598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757142	2542126	2540836	278602	277354	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC18H10.19	not3	vps38	-	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.60497086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757143	2542126	2542254	278602	278724	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC30D11.04c	not3	nup124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.562018197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757144	2542126	2543234	278602	279662	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC977.11	not3	SPAC977.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819074192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757145	2542126	2542519	278602	278977	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC19G12.08	not3	scs7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.563821478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757146	2542126	2541009	278602	277524	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC428.04	not3	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.35015217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757147	2542126	2543080	278602	279513	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC3A11.10c	not3	SPAC3A11.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931150518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757148	2542126	2542919	278602	279360	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC6C3.08	not3	nas6	-	SPAC6C3.08	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.558852103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757149	2542126	2542439	278602	278901	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC17A5.08	not3	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.003885137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757150	2542126	2543443	278602	279863	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC3H1.12c	not3	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.064105939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757151	2542126	2543119	278602	279551	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC3A11.07	not3	nde2	-	SPAC3A11.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81563455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757152	2542126	2541389	278602	277900	SPAC1B3.05	SPBPB2B2.09c	not3	SPBPB2B2.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.375100392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757153	2542126	2541112	278602	277627	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC725.07	not3	pex5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925195406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757154	2542126	2541708	278602	278203	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC31A2.02	not3	trm112	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.644382035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757155	2542126	2541053	278602	277568	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC56F2.10c	not3	alg5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780953681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757156	2542126	2540967	278602	277483	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC36B7.08c	not3	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507374861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757157	2542126	2540599	278602	277125	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC29A3.10c	not3	atp14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.336340565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757158	2542126	3361470	278602	280546	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC3G9.01	not3	nsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.147344782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757159	2542126	2540229	278602	276761	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC31F10.15c	not3	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.336230635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757160	2542126	2542060	278602	278538	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC23C11.14	not3	zhf1	-	zhf	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.499031763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757161	2542126	2539853	278602	276401	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC1347.07	not3	rex2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09302634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757162	2542126	2539812	278602	276362	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC1347.02	not3	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851630428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757163	2542126	2541742	278602	278236	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC22H10.09	not3	SPAC22H10.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.021670042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757164	2542126	2541713	278602	278208	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC3A12.12	not3	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.869770813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757165	2542126	2539908	278602	276454	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC13E7.06	not3	msd1	-	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.048246365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757166	2542126	2539763	278602	276314	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC1861.05	not3	SPBC1861.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.259670149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757167	2542126	2538762	278602	275345	SPAC1B3.05	SPCC306.04c	not3	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.569233894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757168	2542126	2543106	278602	279538	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC3A11.13	not3	SPAC3A11.13	-	SPAC3H5.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.611667065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757169	2542126	2541371	278602	277882	SPAC1B3.05	SPBP4H10.17c	not3	SPBP4H10.17c	-	mrps2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440680138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757170	2542126	2540498	278602	277026	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC27.02c	not3	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.271270547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757171	2542126	2542883	278602	279328	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC1486.04c	not3	alm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.195123121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757172	2542126	2542881	278602	279326	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC13F5.03c	not3	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377552614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757173	2542126	2539925	278602	276469	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC16H5.13	not3	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.743350586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757174	2542126	2540800	278602	277319	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC409.20c	not3	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.810215064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757175	2542126	2543304	278602	279728	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC6B12.12	not3	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.283903288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757176	2542126	2540998	278602	277514	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC3D6.05	not3	ptp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.56213823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757177	2542126	2539246	278602	275816	SPAC1B3.05	SPCC18.13	not3	SPCC18.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.055820591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757178	2542126	2542940	278602	279381	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC31A2.12	not3	SPAC31A2.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.065409001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757179	2542126	2541432	278602	277937	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC1F5.05c	not3	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.768545651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757180	2542126	2540725	278602	277248	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC215.14c	not3	vps20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.053576566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757181	2542126	2541531	278602	278031	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC25A8.01c	not3	fft3	-	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.584293318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757182	2542126	2542418	278602	278881	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC1805.07c	not3	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.431710428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757183	2542126	2539668	278602	276223	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC11B10.10c	not3	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783045294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757184	2542126	2541404	278602	277913	SPAC1B3.05	SPBPB2B2.18	not3	SPBPB2B2.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.828981268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757185	2542126	2541789	278602	278281	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC23H4.08	not3	iwr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63158294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757186	2542126	2540555	278602	277082	SPAC1B3.05	SPBP16F5.02	not3	mcs2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638134572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757187	2542126	2539207	278602	275777	SPAC1B3.05	SPCC285.09c	not3	cgs2	-	pde1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509330202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757188	2542126	2541244	278602	277758	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC8D2.02c	not3	vps68	-	SPBC8D2.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567206774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757189	2542126	2539205	278602	275775	SPAC1B3.05	SPCC4B3.15	not3	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.555946838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757190	2542126	3361117	278602	280193	SPAC1B3.05	SPCC663.17	not3	wtf15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.454317919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757191	2542126	2539169	278602	275740	SPAC1B3.05	SPCC1235.11	not3	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.264962251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757192	2542126	2539700	278602	276253	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC1685.15c	not3	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.659046712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757193	2542126	2543387	278602	279809	SPAC1B3.05	SPAPB1E7.02c	not3	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.617587508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757194	2542126	2543327	278602	279750	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC1D4.06c	not3	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322126018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757195	2542126	2538854	278602	275435	SPAC1B3.05	SPCP1E11.05c	not3	are2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043951118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757196	2542126	2540828	278602	277346	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC4B4.06	not3	vps25	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.438040313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757197	2542126	2543372	278602	279794	SPAC1B3.05	SPAPB1A10.09	not3	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.662182428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757198	2542126	2542943	278602	279384	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC1348.03	not3	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.435960664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757199	2542126	2543472	278602	279892	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC959.04c	not3	omh6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930082717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757200	2542126	2540310	278602	276840	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC29B5.04c	not3	SPBC29B5.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042520741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757201	2542126	2540798	278602	277317	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC19C7.01	not3	mni1	-	SPBC32F12.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324499183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757202	2540956	2542207	277472	278682	SPBC409.06	SPAC17H9.10c	uch2	ddb1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.509502187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757203	2540956	2542862	277472	279308	SPBC409.06	SPAC140.03	uch2	arb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317116199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757204	2540956	2543529	277472	279947	SPBC409.06	SPAC4C5.02c	uch2	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.0277862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757205	2540956	2541098	277472	277613	SPBC409.06	SPBC577.13	uch2	syj2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392418718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757206	2540956	2540825	277472	277343	SPBC409.06	SPBC428.08c	uch2	clr4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.999807741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757207	2540956	3361391	277472	280467	SPBC409.06	SPAC13G6.01c	uch2	rad8	-	SPAC5H10.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.840141552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757208	2540956	2542568	277472	279024	SPBC409.06	SPAC1952.02	uch2	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.819654573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757209	2540956	2542311	277472	278777	SPBC409.06	SPAC16A10.05c	uch2	dad1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.255951515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757210	2540956	2539845	277472	276393	SPBC409.06	SPBC12C2.02c	uch2	ste20	-	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.916944981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757211	2540956	2539733	277472	276285	SPBC409.06	SPBC16E9.12c	uch2	pab2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.076604766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757212	2540956	2541746	277472	278240	SPBC409.06	SPAC20G4.04c	uch2	hus1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.429078089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757213	2540956	2542329	277472	278795	SPBC409.06	SPAC9G1.10c	uch2	SPAC9G1.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.088523017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757214	2540956	2542283	277472	278751	SPBC409.06	SPAC27F1.08	uch2	pdt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704403389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757215	2540956	2543304	277472	279728	SPBC409.06	SPAC6B12.12	uch2	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.877448186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757216	2540956	2543672	277472	280086	SPBC409.06	SPAC4H3.01	uch2	SPAC4H3.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.891581125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757217	2540956	2540936	277472	277452	SPBC409.06	SPBC800.05c	uch2	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.605817295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757218	2540956	2542059	277472	278537	SPBC409.06	SPAC328.06	uch2	ubp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.595493348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757219	2541396	2538939	277905	275514	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC1672.04c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC1672.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.959953443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757220	2541396	2539788	277905	276338	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC17D1.02	SPBPB10D8.02c	dph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448477253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757221	2541396	3361210	277905	280286	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC16E9.16c	SPBPB10D8.02c	lsd90	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769207811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757222	2541396	2542577	277905	279033	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC19G12.15c	SPBPB10D8.02c	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326089565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757223	2541396	2543617	277905	280031	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC4A8.10	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC4A8.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.876072059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757224	2541396	2542382	277905	278846	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC6G10.06	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC6G10.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.716499854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757225	2541396	2540833	277905	277351	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC18H10.20c	SPBPB10D8.02c	any1	-	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989598532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757226	2541396	2542390	277905	278854	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC6F6.11c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC6F6.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.39088087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757227	2541396	2539452	277905	276015	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC70.03c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC70.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.918549267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757228	2541396	2543291	277905	279716	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC9E9.04	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC9E9.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451035583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757229	2541396	2543287	277905	279712	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC9E9.05	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC9E9.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991919793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757230	2541396	2541552	277905	278051	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC1142.08	SPBPB10D8.02c	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.39179333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757231	2541396	2539301	277905	275869	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC622.03c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC622.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.334427326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757232	2541396	2538985	277905	275559	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC13B11.03c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC13B11.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.76949881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757233	2541396	2543677	277905	280091	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAPB1E7.05	SPBPB10D8.02c	gde1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978844905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757234	2541396	2543339	277905	279762	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC630.13c	SPBPB10D8.02c	tsc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.457472539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757235	2541396	2539939	277905	276483	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC11G11.01	SPBPB10D8.02c	fis1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.615215371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757236	2541396	2540296	277905	276827	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC2D10.05	SPBPB10D8.02c	exg3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098480626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757237	2541396	2538732	277905	275316	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC548.07c	SPBPB10D8.02c	ght1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.563087526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757238	2541396	2541117	277905	277632	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC646.13	SPBPB10D8.02c	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.419402349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757239	2541396	2541345	277905	277856	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBP35G2.07	SPBPB10D8.02c	ilv1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980672032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757240	2541396	2543594	277905	280009	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC8F11.05c	SPBPB10D8.02c	mug130	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.329874871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757241	2541396	2539196	277905	275767	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC1795.03	SPBPB10D8.02c	gms1	-	gmn3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.820415243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757242	2541396	2542546	277905	279003	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC1399.05c	SPBPB10D8.02c	toe1	-	SPAC1399.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143884843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757243	2541396	2539201	277905	275772	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC188.09c	SPBPB10D8.02c	pfl4	-	SPCC188.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.978470042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757244	2541396	2541457	277905	277960	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC6G10.10c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC6G10.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982854639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757245	2541396	2540491	277905	277019	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC28E12.04	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.820790426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757246	2541396	2538806	277905	275387	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC1840.09	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508601127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757247	2541396	2543320	277905	279744	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAPJ695.01c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAPJ695.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.551853814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757248	2541396	3361375	277905	280451	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC212.06c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC212.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572847503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757249	2541396	2541951	277905	278438	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC222.05c	SPBPB10D8.02c	mss1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81219429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757250	2541396	2542050	277905	278529	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC212.02	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC212.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.37718531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757251	2541396	2539443	277905	276006	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC736.02	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC736.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.875959275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757252	2541396	2541471	277905	277973	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC1F5.03c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC1F5.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.332047753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757253	2541396	2542816	277905	279263	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC4G8.11c	SPBPB10D8.02c	atp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.941978611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757254	2541396	2541058	277905	277573	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC3H7.09	SPBPB10D8.02c	erf2	-	mug142	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992861798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757255	2541396	2541682	277905	278178	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC15F9.02	SPBPB10D8.02c	seh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.66603107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757256	2541396	2543518	277905	279936	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC4F8.11	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC4F8.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923572239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757257	2541396	2542696	277905	279149	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC29B12.03	SPBPB10D8.02c	spd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.678166621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757258	2541396	2538801	277905	275382	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC285.13c	SPBPB10D8.02c	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444879321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757259	2541396	2541026	277905	277541	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC337.09	SPBPB10D8.02c	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767558692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757260	2541396	3361381	277905	280457	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC12G12.01c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC12G12.01c	-	SPAC630.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819873414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757261	2541396	2543030	277905	279466	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC12B10.10	SPBPB10D8.02c	nod1	-	SPAC12B10.10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.408203065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757262	2541396	2538735	277905	275319	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC70.10	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC70.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876045926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757263	2541396	3361385	277905	280461	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC1639.02c	SPBPB10D8.02c	trk2	-	SPAC1F5.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097838202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757264	2541396	2540993	277905	277509	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC342.01c	SPBPB10D8.02c	alg6	-	SPBC3F6.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.987894214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757265	2541396	2542022	277905	278505	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC23A1.03	SPBPB10D8.02c	apt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196792791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757266	2541396	2540295	277905	276826	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC3B8.05	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC3B8.05	-	dph1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573970848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757267	2541396	2542277	277905	278746	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBPB10D8.02c	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.274421877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757268	2541396	2539175	277905	275746	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC16C4.01	SPBPB10D8.02c	sif2	-	SPCC5E4.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92791147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757269	2541396	2539244	277905	275814	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC1672.06c	SPBPB10D8.02c	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.119781988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757270	2541396	2541416	277905	277923	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBCPT2R1.01c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBCPT2R1.01c	-	SPBPB2B2.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.827951614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757271	2541396	2539100	277905	275672	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC330.12c	SPBPB10D8.02c	sdh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.123853969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757272	2541396	2543319	277905	279743	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC6B12.09	SPBPB10D8.02c	trm10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640775391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757273	2541396	2539574	277905	276134	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCPB16A4.04c	SPBPB10D8.02c	trm8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.511602183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757274	2541396	2540359	277905	276888	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC30D10.14	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC30D10.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913374509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757275	2541396	2542033	277905	278515	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC2C4.09	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC2C4.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195564466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757276	2541396	2540222	277905	276755	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC32F12.03c	SPBPB10D8.02c	gpx1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.036819415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757277	2541396	2541339	277905	277850	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBP4G3.02	SPBPB10D8.02c	pho1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.570439993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757278	2541396	2541275	277905	277789	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC947.06c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC947.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989508066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757279	2541396	2539339	277905	275905	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC1494.03	SPBPB10D8.02c	arz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817926425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757280	2541396	2542177	277905	278652	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC17H9.08	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579714761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757281	2541396	2539003	277905	275577	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC1442.17c	SPBPB10D8.02c	ist1	-	SPCC285.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040599379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757282	2541396	2543342	277905	279765	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC521.04c	SPBPB10D8.02c	sst1	-	SPAC521.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645194665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757283	2541396	2540797	277905	277316	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC18H10.11c	SPBPB10D8.02c	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.488964262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757284	2541396	2543461	277905	279881	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC521.03	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC521.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507491633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757285	2541396	2540892	277905	277408	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC530.01	SPBPB10D8.02c	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.50906033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757286	2541396	2540903	277905	277419	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC530.05	SPBPB10D8.02c	prt1	-	SPBC530.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.869589903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757287	2541396	2541093	277905	277608	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC646.08c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC646.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0654548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757288	2541396	2541288	277905	277801	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBP35G2.04c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBP35G2.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.718937001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757289	2541396	2540192	277905	276725	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC1215.01	SPBPB10D8.02c	shy1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.558537052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757290	2541396	2540241	277905	276773	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC32H8.11	SPBPB10D8.02c	mei4	-	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770875896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757291	2541396	2542652	277905	279106	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC1687.15	SPBPB10D8.02c	gsk3	-	skp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.76682319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757292	2541396	2539754	277905	276306	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC16C6.04	SPBPB10D8.02c	dbl6	-	SPBC16C6.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.815135443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757293	2541396	2539733	277905	276285	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBPB10D8.02c	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.840654605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757294	2541396	2540150	277905	276687	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC16E9.14c	SPBPB10D8.02c	zrg17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.337320407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757295	2541396	2542971	277905	279410	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC105.02c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC105.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.767816654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757296	2541396	2542469	277905	278930	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC19A8.04	SPBPB10D8.02c	erg5	-	cyp61	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924935398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757297	2541396	2541166	277905	277681	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC725.15	SPBPB10D8.02c	ura5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933672524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757298	2541396	2543231	277905	279659	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAPB8E5.08	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAPB8E5.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03920835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757299	2541396	2539603	277905	276161	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC1289.06c	SPBPB10D8.02c	ppr8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.258798871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757300	2541396	2543246	277905	279674	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAPB8E5.05	SPBPB10D8.02c	mfm1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871676826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757301	2541396	2538958	277905	275532	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC24B10.20	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC24B10.20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445832541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757302	2541396	2542013	277905	278496	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC20H4.11c	SPBPB10D8.02c	rho5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.615486736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757303	2541396	2540350	277905	276879	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC317.01	SPBPB10D8.02c	mbx2	-	pvg4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327641127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757304	2541396	2539284	277905	275852	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC584.15c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC584.15c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.772068042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757305	2541396	2539455	277905	276018	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC736.09c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC736.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.518128339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757306	2541396	2542861	277905	279307	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC13G7.13c	SPBPB10D8.02c	msa1	-	SPAC6C3.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929107669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757307	2541396	3361269	277905	280345	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC31A8.01c	SPBPB10D8.02c	rtn1	-	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.074600128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757308	2541396	2542528	277905	278986	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC1B3.08	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC1B3.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.876561211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757309	2541396	2540665	277905	277190	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC83.02c	SPBPB10D8.02c	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.33728659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757310	2541396	2541828	277905	278319	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC22H12.05c	SPBPB10D8.02c	fsc1	-	SPAC22H12.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.50468596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757311	2541396	2542946	277905	279386	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC6F12.03c	SPBPB10D8.02c	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.972934399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757312	2541396	2543392	277905	279814	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC8F11.03	SPBPB10D8.02c	msh3	-	swi4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.664086286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757313	2541396	2542214	277905	278688	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPACUNK4.11c	SPBPB10D8.02c	mpp6	-	SPACUNK4.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.267374096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757314	2541396	2543234	277905	279662	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC977.11	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC977.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.970921156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757315	2541396	2543080	277905	279513	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC3A11.10c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC3A11.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.768378914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757316	2541396	2542919	277905	279360	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC6C3.08	SPBPB10D8.02c	nas6	-	SPAC6C3.08	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922630188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757317	2541396	2540094	277905	276632	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC146.10	SPBPB10D8.02c	mug57	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817512946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757318	2541396	2540335	277905	276865	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC30B4.03c	SPBPB10D8.02c	adn1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979265268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757319	2541396	2542056	277905	278535	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC6G9.14	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC6G9.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.540248385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757320	2541396	2542437	277905	278899	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC17A5.01	SPBPB10D8.02c	pex6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.025323707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757321	2541396	2543119	277905	279551	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC3A11.07	SPBPB10D8.02c	nde2	-	SPAC3A11.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.819958342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757322	2541396	2539368	277905	275934	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC16A11.07	SPBPB10D8.02c	coq10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.380049391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757323	2541396	2541112	277905	277627	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC725.07	SPBPB10D8.02c	pex5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.275116219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757324	2541396	2540967	277905	277483	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.564501466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757325	2541396	2538828	277905	275409	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC1020.05	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC1020.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.648020893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757326	2541396	2539427	277905	275992	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC663.15c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC663.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330744619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757327	2541396	2541266	277905	277780	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBP16F5.05c	SPBPB10D8.02c	yar1	-	SPBP16F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.114650077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757328	2541396	2539344	277905	275910	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC1672.09	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC1672.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.448522487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757329	2541396	2540229	277905	276761	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC31F10.15c	SPBPB10D8.02c	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.533624103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757330	2541396	2538884	277905	275462	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC1393.08	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576506632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757331	2541396	3361105	277905	280181	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC188.10c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC188.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.340448422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757332	2541396	2541488	277905	277990	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC227.17c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.75063841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757333	2541396	2543049	277905	279484	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC1296.04	SPBPB10D8.02c	mug65	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510455175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757334	2541396	2539605	277905	276163	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC1105.13c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC1105.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042179465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757335	2541396	2542781	277905	279230	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC57A10.12c	SPBPB10D8.02c	ura3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.234227097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757336	2541396	2539519	277905	276081	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC364.05	SPBPB10D8.02c	vps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.057472706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757337	2541396	2543193	277905	279622	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC3F10.11c	SPBPB10D8.02c	abc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.27056587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757338	2541396	3361520	277905	280596	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC1610.02c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.839676381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757339	2541396	2540946	277905	277462	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC36.04	SPBPB10D8.02c	cys11	-	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.741715969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757340	2541396	2541713	277905	278208	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC3A12.12	SPBPB10D8.02c	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872749525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757341	2541396	2539362	277905	275928	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC18B5.10c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC18B5.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.986505782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757342	2541396	2540242	277905	276774	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC32F12.07c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC32F12.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.197642127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757343	2541396	2539438	277905	276001	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC4B3.07	SPBPB10D8.02c	nro1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.806102217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757344	2541396	2542881	277905	279326	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC13F5.03c	SPBPB10D8.02c	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.492223409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757345	2541396	2540044	277905	276582	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC1778.04	SPBPB10D8.02c	spo6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153049877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757346	2541396	2541121	277905	277636	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC609.03	SPBPB10D8.02c	iqw1	-	iqwd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.99045772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757347	2541396	2539030	277905	275603	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCP1E11.02	SPBPB10D8.02c	ppk38	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866736509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757348	2541396	2540998	277905	277514	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC3D6.05	SPBPB10D8.02c	ptp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.123263119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757349	2541396	2539246	277905	275816	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC18.13	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC18.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.025228626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757350	2541396	2540960	277905	277476	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC3D6.02	SPBPB10D8.02c	but2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.197299752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757351	2541396	2543096	277905	279528	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC977.05c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.647184163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757352	2541396	2541279	277905	277792	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC8E4.03	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC8E4.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.341171087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757353	2541396	2540657	277905	277182	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC1E8.02	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC1E8.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.462901014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757354	2541396	2539614	277905	276172	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC17D11.08	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC17D11.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.263661847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757355	2541396	2543130	277905	279562	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC869.05c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC869.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.916053675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757356	2541396	2542955	277905	279395	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC11E3.12	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC11E3.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.202124709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757357	2541396	2538779	277905	275360	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC569.07	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC569.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.743781942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757358	2541396	2543329	277905	279752	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC56F8.02	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC56F8.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.147534997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757359	2541396	2538915	277905	275492	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC23B6.02c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC23B6.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.005538357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757360	2541396	3361329	277905	280405	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC25H2.10c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC25H2.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.266570447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757361	2541396	2540211	277905	276744	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC947.15c	SPBPB10D8.02c	nde1	-	SPBC947.15c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.81490547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757362	2541396	2539188	277905	275759	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC1827.04	SPBPB10D8.02c	vms1	-	SPCC1827.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.610151429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757363	2541396	2539327	277905	275893	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC1442.13c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC1442.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512896896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757364	2541396	2540297	277905	276828	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC24C6.08c	SPBPB10D8.02c	bhd1	-	bhd	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.180691065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757365	2541396	2540928	277905	277444	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC3E7.10	SPBPB10D8.02c	fma1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.456066374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757366	2541396	2543109	277905	279541	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC3G6.09c	SPBPB10D8.02c	tps2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.339544371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757367	2541396	2539205	277905	275775	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC4B3.15	SPBPB10D8.02c	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.683539497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757368	2541396	2543124	277905	279556	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC3A11.06	SPBPB10D8.02c	mvp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.513991533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757369	2541396	2539375	277905	275941	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC4G3.11	SPBPB10D8.02c	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.606848765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757370	2541396	2542186	277905	278661	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC17C9.14	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC17C9.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205670143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757371	2541396	2540270	277905	276801	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC2G2.02	SPBPB10D8.02c	syj1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982994069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757372	2541396	2540504	277905	277032	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC24C6.10c	SPBPB10D8.02c	dip1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.461913574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757373	2541396	2539181	277905	275752	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC622.14	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC622.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.283484503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757374	2541396	2541806	277905	278297	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBPB10D8.02c	prz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866584634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757375	2541396	2540409	277905	276937	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC2D10.11c	SPBPB10D8.02c	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.510473037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757376	2541396	2538718	277905	275302	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC4B3.06c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC4B3.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580076571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757377	2541396	2539583	277905	276142	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC777.04	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPCC777.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.916360284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757378	2541396	2541375	277905	277886	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBP8B7.31	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBP8B7.31	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196945646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757379	2541396	2540093	277905	276631	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC115.02c	SPBPB10D8.02c	afg1	-	SPBC115.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.866914468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757380	2541396	2543644	277905	280058	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAPB1A10.03	SPBPB10D8.02c	nxt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927386818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757381	2541396	2542111	277905	278587	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC1687.14c	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC1687.14c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818454897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757382	2541396	2540309	277905	276839	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC21B10.13c	SPBPB10D8.02c	yox1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094752735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757383	2541396	2543501	277905	279919	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPAC664.14	SPBPB10D8.02c	amt2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153134057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757384	2541396	2541236	277905	277750	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC887.11	SPBPB10D8.02c	pus2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986521714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757385	2541396	2540736	277905	277259	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC19F8.02	SPBPB10D8.02c	SPBC19F8.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.332016726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757386	2543399	2540060	279821	276598	SPAC3G9.12	SPBC106.01	peg1	mph1	cls1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641974779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757387	2543399	2542816	279821	279263	SPAC3G9.12	SPAC4G8.11c	peg1	atp10	cls1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989083154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757388	2543399	2540220	279821	276753	SPAC3G9.12	SPBC337.03	peg1	rhn1	cls1	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.374742998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757389	2543399	2541926	279821	278414	SPAC3G9.12	SPAC222.14c	peg1	SPAC222.14c	cls1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.164667743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757390	2543399	2543628	279821	280042	SPAC3G9.12	SPAC3H8.10	peg1	spo20	cls1	sec14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871264584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757391	2543399	2540498	279821	277026	SPAC3G9.12	SPBC27.02c	peg1	ask1	cls1	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.165181422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757392	2543399	2540998	279821	277514	SPAC3G9.12	SPBC3D6.05	peg1	ptp4	cls1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.056558109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757393	2543399	2543372	279821	279794	SPAC3G9.12	SPAPB1A10.09	peg1	ase1	cls1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.454789695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757394	2538946	2538721	275520	275305	SPCC162.11c	SPCC1494.10	SPCC162.11c	adn3	-	SPCC70.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.512574061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757395	2538946	2539841	275520	276389	SPCC162.11c	SPBC17D1.05	SPCC162.11c	SPBC17D1.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205091576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757396	2538946	2541257	275520	277771	SPCC162.11c	SPBP23A10.14c	SPCC162.11c	ell1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.485798551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757397	2538946	2540789	275520	277308	SPCC162.11c	SPBC19C2.06c	SPCC162.11c	mug124	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.337164955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757398	2538946	2542598	275520	279052	SPCC162.11c	SPAC6G10.08	SPCC162.11c	idp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.407371232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757399	2538946	2542518	275520	278976	SPCC162.11c	SPAC1B3.16c	SPCC162.11c	vht1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.672474451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757400	2538946	2541971	275520	278456	SPCC162.11c	SPAC27F1.05c	SPCC162.11c	SPAC27F1.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.867031978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757401	2538946	2541512	275520	278013	SPCC162.11c	SPAC11E3.08c	SPCC162.11c	nse6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.266429918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757402	2538946	2542066	275520	278543	SPCC162.11c	SPAC227.05	SPCC162.11c	SPAC227.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.28266681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757403	2538946	2541032	275520	277547	SPCC162.11c	SPBC3H7.11	SPCC162.11c	SPBC3H7.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045108302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757404	2538946	2541552	275520	278051	SPCC162.11c	SPAC1142.08	SPCC162.11c	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.93022041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757405	2538946	2541621	275520	278118	SPCC162.11c	SPAC29A4.17c	SPCC162.11c	SPAC29A4.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193455929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757406	2538946	2542953	275520	279393	SPCC162.11c	SPAC1006.06	SPCC162.11c	rgf2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.330155713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757407	2538946	2541438	275520	277943	SPCC162.11c	SPAC23G3.10c	SPCC162.11c	ssr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.911209414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757408	2538946	2541104	275520	277619	SPCC162.11c	SPBC6B1.03c	SPCC162.11c	SPBC6B1.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.588932224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757409	2538946	2541117	275520	277632	SPCC162.11c	SPBC646.13	SPCC162.11c	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813758229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757410	2538946	2541051	275520	277566	SPCC162.11c	SPBC3E7.08c	SPCC162.11c	rad13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.697647899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757411	2538946	2541345	275520	277856	SPCC162.11c	SPBP35G2.07	SPCC162.11c	ilv1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.921529114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757412	2538946	2542917	275520	279358	SPCC162.11c	SPAC9E9.11	SPCC162.11c	plr1	-	plr	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.895622159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757413	2538946	2542614	275520	279068	SPCC162.11c	SPAC1399.04c	SPCC162.11c	SPAC1399.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.636071191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757414	2538946	3361436	275520	280512	SPCC162.11c	SPAC1296.01c	SPCC162.11c	SPAC1296.01c	-	SPAC22F3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.868954358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757415	2538946	2543320	275520	279744	SPCC162.11c	SPAPJ695.01c	SPCC162.11c	SPAPJ695.01c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986716721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757416	2538946	2539210	275520	275780	SPCC162.11c	SPCC2H8.05c	SPCC162.11c	dbl1	-	SPCC2H8.05c|SPCC63.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454494449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757417	2538946	2541235	275520	277749	SPCC162.11c	SPBC8D2.12c	SPCC162.11c	SPBC8D2.12c	-	pI053	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931558782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757418	2538946	2540975	275520	277491	SPCC162.11c	SPBC354.12	SPCC162.11c	gpd3	-	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.972882386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757419	2538946	2541795	275520	278286	SPCC162.11c	SPAC2E1P3.02c	SPCC162.11c	amt3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099036441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757420	2538946	2541200	275520	277714	SPCC162.11c	SPBC8D2.03c	SPCC162.11c	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.750321011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757421	2538946	2541951	275520	278438	SPCC162.11c	SPAC222.05c	SPCC162.11c	mss1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258357768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757422	2538946	2540979	275520	277495	SPCC162.11c	SPBC3H7.10	SPCC162.11c	elp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095396152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757423	2538946	2541313	275520	277825	SPCC162.11c	SPBP26C9.02c	SPCC162.11c	car1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818828088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757424	2538946	2539443	275520	276006	SPCC162.11c	SPCC736.02	SPCC162.11c	SPCC736.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.380950344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757425	2538946	2541058	275520	277573	SPCC162.11c	SPBC3H7.09	SPCC162.11c	erf2	-	mug142	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.257413044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757426	2538946	2541682	275520	278178	SPCC162.11c	SPAC15F9.02	SPCC162.11c	seh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047479116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757427	2538946	2543043	275520	279478	SPCC162.11c	SPAC3F10.13	SPCC162.11c	ucp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.765339933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757428	2538946	2542689	275520	279142	SPCC162.11c	SPAC29B12.04	SPCC162.11c	snz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.273858045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757429	2538946	2542724	275520	279175	SPCC162.11c	SPAC767.01c	SPCC162.11c	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.19072524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757430	2538946	2542709	275520	279162	SPCC162.11c	SPAC26F1.08c	SPCC162.11c	SPAC26F1.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.51772743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757431	2538946	2543159	275520	279590	SPCC162.11c	SPAC3C7.09	SPCC162.11c	set8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.667717851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757432	2538946	2540220	275520	276753	SPCC162.11c	SPBC337.03	SPCC162.11c	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.722985893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757433	2538946	2540095	275520	276633	SPCC162.11c	SPBC115.03	SPCC162.11c	SPBC115.03	-	SPBC839.18c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.458421803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757434	2538946	2541541	275520	278041	SPCC162.11c	SPAC1F7.11c	SPCC162.11c	SPAC1F7.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.513611725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757435	2538946	2540160	275520	276695	SPCC162.11c	SPBC1773.17c	SPCC162.11c	SPBC1773.17c	-	SPBP26C9.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.818758271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757436	2538946	2541119	275520	277634	SPCC162.11c	SPBC651.11c	SPCC162.11c	apm3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992675497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757437	2538946	2542165	275520	278641	SPCC162.11c	SPAC1782.08c	SPCC162.11c	rex3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045429102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757438	2538946	2542318	275520	278784	SPCC162.11c	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC162.11c	cph1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096789488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757439	2538946	2542023	275520	278506	SPCC162.11c	SPAC20H4.10	SPCC162.11c	ufd2	-	SPAC145.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.348177633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757440	2538946	2542969	275520	279409	SPCC162.11c	SPAC4G8.10	SPCC162.11c	gos1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867896545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757441	2538946	2541436	275520	277941	SPCC162.11c	SPAC11H11.03c	SPCC162.11c	SPAC11H11.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.404979384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757442	2538946	2538823	275520	275404	SPCC162.11c	SPCC18B5.02c	SPCC162.11c	SPCC18B5.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.33410593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757443	2538946	2541311	275520	277823	SPCC162.11c	SPBP8B7.09c	SPCC162.11c	los1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.042339238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757444	2538946	2539525	275520	276087	SPCC162.11c	SPCC613.01	SPCC162.11c	SPCC613.01	-	SPCC757.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767549764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757445	2538946	2541522	275520	278023	SPCC162.11c	SPAC23E2.01	SPCC162.11c	fep1	-	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.67806591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757446	2538946	2542530	275520	278988	SPCC162.11c	SPAC1399.02	SPCC162.11c	SPAC1399.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09075274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757447	2538946	2540415	275520	276943	SPCC162.11c	SPBC30B4.06c	SPCC162.11c	SPBC30B4.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.875715936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757448	2538946	2542253	275520	278723	SPCC162.11c	SPAC17H9.04c	SPCC162.11c	SPAC17H9.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.14509014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757449	2538946	2542213	275520	278687	SPCC162.11c	SPAC3G6.13c	SPCC162.11c	rpl4101	-	rpl41-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.2297948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757450	2538946	2541926	275520	278414	SPCC162.11c	SPAC222.14c	SPCC162.11c	SPAC222.14c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.484663237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757451	2538946	2542558	275520	279014	SPCC162.11c	SPAC1952.07	SPCC162.11c	rad1	-	rad19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.721955425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757452	2538946	2541246	275520	277760	SPCC162.11c	SPBC8E4.02c	SPCC162.11c	SPBC8E4.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813668543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757453	2538946	2540340	275520	276869	SPCC162.11c	SPBC2D10.15c	SPCC162.11c	pth1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329803692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757454	2538946	2543573	275520	279988	SPCC162.11c	SPAC869.11	SPCC162.11c	cat1	-	SPAC922.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.77495695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757455	2538946	2539388	275520	275953	SPCC162.11c	SPCC24B10.12	SPCC162.11c	cgi121	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933885132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757456	2538946	2543349	275520	279771	SPCC162.11c	SPAC977.02	SPCC162.11c	SPAC977.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321524845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757457	2538946	2542260	275520	278729	SPCC162.11c	SPAC1F12.05	SPCC162.11c	SPAC1F12.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.051014226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757458	2538946	2542371	275520	278835	SPCC162.11c	SPACUNK4.17	SPCC162.11c	SPACUNK4.17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927454043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757459	2538946	2540312	275520	276842	SPCC162.11c	SPBC31F10.08	SPCC162.11c	mde2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982072053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757460	2538946	2543135	275520	279567	SPCC162.11c	SPAC869.06c	SPCC162.11c	SPAC869.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871808249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757461	2538946	2542177	275520	278652	SPCC162.11c	SPAC17H9.08	SPCC162.11c	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866375655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757462	2538946	2539952	275520	276496	SPCC162.11c	SPBC1709.14	SPCC162.11c	SPBC1709.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.003173225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757463	2538946	2541392	275520	277902	SPCC162.11c	SPBPB10D8.04c	SPCC162.11c	SPBPB10D8.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.340015832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757464	2538946	2542484	275520	278944	SPCC162.11c	SPAC1A6.07	SPCC162.11c	sle1	-	SPAC1A6.07|seg1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872405108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757465	2538946	2542964	275520	279404	SPCC162.11c	SPAC12G12.07c	SPCC162.11c	SPAC12G12.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.505476937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757466	2538946	2541801	275520	278292	SPCC162.11c	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC162.11c	snf5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.179739745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757467	2538946	2541249	275520	277763	SPCC162.11c	SPBC947.01	SPCC162.11c	alf1	-	SPBC947.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.510727442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757468	2538946	2541237	275520	277751	SPCC162.11c	SPBC947.04	SPCC162.11c	pfl3	-	SPBC947.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.596433312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757469	2538946	2541982	275520	278467	SPCC162.11c	SPAC23A1.06c	SPCC162.11c	cmk2	-	mkp2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201081369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757470	2538946	2542707	275520	279160	SPCC162.11c	SPAC25G10.03	SPCC162.11c	zip1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808132241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757471	2538946	2540922	275520	277438	SPCC162.11c	SPBC36.10	SPCC162.11c	SPBC36.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037797454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757472	2538946	2541892	275520	278382	SPCC162.11c	SPAP27G11.02	SPCC162.11c	SPAP27G11.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931899918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757473	2538946	2542971	275520	279410	SPCC162.11c	SPAC105.02c	SPCC162.11c	SPAC105.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.273790643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757474	2538946	2541911	275520	278401	SPCC162.11c	SPAC212.04c	SPCC162.11c	SPAC212.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814665322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757475	2538946	2542297	275520	278764	SPCC162.11c	SPAC17H9.06c	SPCC162.11c	SPAC17H9.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047563637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757476	2538946	2542469	275520	278930	SPCC162.11c	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC162.11c	erg5	-	cyp61	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877301469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757477	2538946	2543667	275520	280081	SPCC162.11c	SPAC4H3.02c	SPCC162.11c	swc3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817359971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757478	2538946	2542270	275520	278739	SPCC162.11c	SPAC17H9.14c	SPCC162.11c	pdi2	-	SPAC17H9.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.338556825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757479	2538946	2541310	275520	277822	SPCC162.11c	SPBP18G5.03	SPCC162.11c	toc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.052480721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757480	2538946	2542357	275520	278822	SPCC162.11c	SPAC1782.07	SPCC162.11c	qcr8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.923174761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757481	2538946	2543101	275520	279533	SPCC162.11c	SPAC323.03c	SPCC162.11c	SPAC323.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699951284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757482	2538946	2541532	275520	278032	SPCC162.11c	SPAC2C4.15c	SPCC162.11c	ubx2	-	ucp13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.916575976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757483	2538946	2539233	275520	275803	SPCC162.11c	SPCC16A11.03c	SPCC162.11c	SPCC16A11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383939622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757484	2538946	2540326	275520	276856	SPCC162.11c	SPBC2G5.06c	SPCC162.11c	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454566708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757485	2538946	2542014	275520	278497	SPCC162.11c	SPAC20H4.04	SPCC162.11c	fml2	-	mfh2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817943677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757486	2538946	2542710	275520	279163	SPCC162.11c	SPAC750.08c	SPCC162.11c	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.929142225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757487	2538946	2542946	275520	279386	SPCC162.11c	SPAC6F12.03c	SPCC162.11c	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.764137048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757488	2538946	2542419	275520	278882	SPCC162.11c	SPAC17G6.05c	SPCC162.11c	bro1	-	SPAC17G6.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.503268446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757489	2538946	2540961	275520	277477	SPCC162.11c	SPBC36B7.03	SPCC162.11c	sec63	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.718328485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757490	2538946	2540224	275520	276757	SPCC162.11c	SPBC32H8.06	SPCC162.11c	mug93	-	pi018|SPACTOKYO_453.18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.192323284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757491	2538946	2543495	275520	279914	SPCC162.11c	SPAC513.03	SPCC162.11c	mfm2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.935195232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757492	2538946	2541248	275520	277762	SPCC162.11c	SPBC8D2.10c	SPCC162.11c	rmt3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147860694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757493	2538946	2543378	275520	279800	SPCC162.11c	SPAC3H8.07c	SPCC162.11c	pac10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984993414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757494	2538946	2542214	275520	278688	SPCC162.11c	SPACUNK4.11c	SPCC162.11c	mpp6	-	SPACUNK4.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042629232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757495	2538946	2540374	275520	276903	SPCC162.11c	SPBC31F10.02	SPCC162.11c	SPBC31F10.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.139039154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757496	2538946	2543311	275520	279735	SPCC162.11c	SPAC977.15	SPCC162.11c	SPAC977.15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.405347195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757497	2538946	2540318	275520	276848	SPCC162.11c	SPBC30B4.04c	SPCC162.11c	sol1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.847089422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757498	2538946	2542855	275520	279301	SPCC162.11c	SPAC144.04c	SPCC162.11c	spe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326410888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757499	2538946	2539715	275520	276268	SPCC162.11c	SPBC1778.09	SPCC162.11c	SPBC1778.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262549957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757500	2538946	2542437	275520	278899	SPCC162.11c	SPAC17A5.01	SPCC162.11c	pex6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38917509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757501	2538946	2542055	275520	278534	SPCC162.11c	SPAC6G9.03c	SPCC162.11c	mug183	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.814628175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757502	2538946	2540387	275520	276915	SPCC162.11c	SPBC24C6.04	SPCC162.11c	SPBC24C6.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152998342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757503	2538946	2538949	275520	275523	SPCC162.11c	SPCC320.03	SPCC162.11c	SPCC320.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.339823648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757504	2538946	2540378	275520	276907	SPCC162.11c	SPBC30D10.18c	SPCC162.11c	rpl102	-	rpl1-2|rpl10a-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.14835329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757505	2538946	2541389	275520	277900	SPCC162.11c	SPBPB2B2.09c	SPCC162.11c	SPBPB2B2.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818908015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757506	2538946	2540201	275520	276734	SPCC162.11c	SPBC13A2.04c	SPCC162.11c	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.072769441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757507	2538946	2541708	275520	278203	SPCC162.11c	SPAC31A2.02	SPCC162.11c	trm112	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044847446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757508	2538946	2541464	275520	277966	SPCC162.11c	SPAC222.08c	SPCC162.11c	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817568729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757509	2538946	2540180	275520	276713	SPCC162.11c	SPBC16D10.11c	SPCC162.11c	rps1801	-	rps18-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.176464861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757510	2538946	2540599	275520	277125	SPCC162.11c	SPBC29A3.10c	SPCC162.11c	atp14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923456426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757511	2538946	2543390	275520	279812	SPCC162.11c	SPAC631.01c	SPCC162.11c	acp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.665215947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757512	2538946	2539711	275520	276264	SPCC162.11c	SPBC1683.09c	SPCC162.11c	frp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.260503723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757513	2538946	2539853	275520	276401	SPCC162.11c	SPBC1347.07	SPCC162.11c	rex2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639396475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757514	2538946	2539812	275520	276362	SPCC162.11c	SPBC1347.02	SPCC162.11c	fkbp39	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817440484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757515	2538946	2540193	275520	276726	SPCC162.11c	SPBC1289.10c	SPCC162.11c	adn2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934041688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757516	2538946	2540926	275520	277442	SPCC162.11c	SPBC359.06	SPCC162.11c	mug14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.866523682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757517	2538946	2543139	275520	279571	SPCC162.11c	SPAC12G12.03	SPCC162.11c	cip2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442383354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757518	2538946	2540930	275520	277446	SPCC162.11c	SPBC354.10	SPCC162.11c	def1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.387194313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757519	2538946	2539519	275520	276081	SPCC162.11c	SPCC364.05	SPCC162.11c	vps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.631612241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757520	2538946	2540691	275520	277216	SPCC162.11c	SPBC20F10.05	SPCC162.11c	nrl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.155349686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757521	2538946	3361526	275520	280602	SPCC162.11c	SPAC664.15	SPCC162.11c	caf4	-	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323215565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757522	2538946	2541793	275520	278284	SPCC162.11c	SPAC22H10.02	SPCC162.11c	SPAC22H10.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633556024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757523	2538946	2541017	275520	277532	SPCC162.11c	SPBC36.07	SPCC162.11c	elp1	-	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101007963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757524	2538946	2540643	275520	277168	SPCC162.11c	SPBC19G7.06	SPCC162.11c	mbx1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.195389608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757525	2538946	2540918	275520	277434	SPCC162.11c	SPBC800.02	SPCC162.11c	whi5	-	mug54	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.611775509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757526	2538946	2540460	275520	276988	SPCC162.11c	SPBC2A9.07c	SPCC162.11c	hpz1	-	SPBC2A9.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.130314278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757527	2538946	2540226	275520	276758	SPCC162.11c	SPBC32H8.08c	SPCC162.11c	omh5	-	pi016|SPACTOKYO_453.20	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.721496982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757528	2538946	2543619	275520	280033	SPCC162.11c	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC162.11c	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.25124482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757529	2538946	2540809	275520	277328	SPCC162.11c	SPBC18A7.01	SPCC162.11c	SPBC18A7.01	-	SPBC4F6.19c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814805678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757530	2538946	2542327	275520	278793	SPCC162.11c	SPAC16C9.06c	SPCC162.11c	upf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101980846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757531	2538946	2541175	275520	277689	SPCC162.11c	SPBC839.13c	SPCC162.11c	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148209786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757532	2538946	2543096	275520	279528	SPCC162.11c	SPAC977.05c	SPCC162.11c	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.893312986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757533	2538946	2541372	275520	277883	SPCC162.11c	SPBP8B7.28c	SPCC162.11c	stc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820864593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757534	2538946	2543160	275520	279591	SPCC162.11c	SPAC31A2.14	SPCC162.11c	bun107	-	wdr48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934029557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757535	2538946	2541358	275520	277869	SPCC162.11c	SPBP4H10.16c	SPCC162.11c	SPBP4H10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699534421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757536	2538946	2538714	275520	275298	SPCC162.11c	SPCC330.11	SPCC162.11c	btb1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.929376072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757537	2538946	2543065	275520	279498	SPCC162.11c	SPAC343.15	SPCC162.11c	tit1	-	mod5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866409914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757538	2538946	2543066	275520	279499	SPCC162.11c	SPAC343.12	SPCC162.11c	rds1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.020882158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757539	2538946	2539239	275520	275809	SPCC162.11c	SPCC1020.10	SPCC162.11c	oca2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.188308959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757540	2538946	2540725	275520	277248	SPCC162.11c	SPBC215.14c	SPCC162.11c	vps20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38445035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757541	2538946	2543329	275520	279752	SPCC162.11c	SPAC56F8.02	SPCC162.11c	SPAC56F8.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508453408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757542	2538946	2543480	275520	279900	SPCC162.11c	SPAC688.03c	SPCC162.11c	SPAC688.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.517269501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757543	2538946	2541860	275520	278350	SPCC162.11c	SPAC22F3.02	SPCC162.11c	atf31	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.616591726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757544	2538946	2538916	275520	275493	SPCC162.11c	SPCC16C4.17	SPCC162.11c	mug123	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388080413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757545	2538946	2542326	275520	278792	SPCC162.11c	SPAC16C9.07	SPCC162.11c	pom2	-	SPAC2G11.01|mug189|ppk5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.406518286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757546	2538946	2543228	275520	279656	SPCC162.11c	SPAC6B12.04c	SPCC162.11c	SPAC6B12.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992860083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757547	2538946	2539188	275520	275759	SPCC162.11c	SPCC1827.04	SPCC162.11c	vms1	-	SPCC1827.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.90871056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757548	2538946	2539182	275520	275753	SPCC162.11c	SPCC16A11.16c	SPCC162.11c	rpn1302	-	rpn13|rpn13b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512596326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757549	2538946	2542091	275520	278568	SPCC162.11c	SPAC7D4.02c	SPCC162.11c	sfp47	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874630916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757550	2538946	2540516	275520	277044	SPCC162.11c	SPBC21C3.01c	SPCC162.11c	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877305517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757551	2538946	2540297	275520	276828	SPCC162.11c	SPBC24C6.08c	SPCC162.11c	bhd1	-	bhd	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.969077106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757552	2538946	2540245	275520	276777	SPCC162.11c	SPBC31F10.17c	SPCC162.11c	SPBC31F10.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874774983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757553	2538946	2540568	275520	277095	SPCC162.11c	SPBC28F2.08c	SPCC162.11c	SPBC28F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384380123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757554	2538946	2539928	275520	276472	SPCC162.11c	SPBC1604.08c	SPCC162.11c	imp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.118948243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757555	2538946	2543046	275520	279481	SPCC162.11c	SPAC3C7.10	SPCC162.11c	pex13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982493879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757556	2538946	2541757	275520	278251	SPCC162.11c	SPAC2F7.10	SPCC162.11c	akr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.402681828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757557	2538946	2540380	275520	276909	SPCC162.11c	SPBC1A4.05	SPCC162.11c	blt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.569558179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757558	2538946	2539920	275520	276464	SPCC162.11c	SPBC119.08	SPCC162.11c	pmk1	-	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.068186942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757559	2538946	2540140	275520	276677	SPCC162.11c	SPBC16C6.08c	SPCC162.11c	qcr6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988297762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757560	2538946	2540896	275520	277412	SPCC162.11c	SPBC19C2.13c	SPCC162.11c	ctu2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098606882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757561	2538946	2539375	275520	275941	SPCC162.11c	SPCC4G3.11	SPCC162.11c	mug154	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92306502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757562	2538946	2543380	275520	279802	SPCC162.11c	SPAC4G9.16c	SPCC162.11c	rpl901	-	rpl9-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.612816256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757563	2538946	2542871	275520	279316	SPCC162.11c	SPAC6F12.10c	SPCC162.11c	ade3	-	min11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.279816448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757564	2538946	2542021	275520	278504	SPCC162.11c	SPAP14E8.02	SPCC162.11c	tos4	-	SPAP14E8.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.460068497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757565	2538946	2540504	275520	277032	SPCC162.11c	SPBC24C6.10c	SPCC162.11c	dip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633714049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757566	2538946	2541645	275520	278141	SPCC162.11c	SPAC1527.03	SPCC162.11c	SPAC1527.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.766057406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757567	2538946	2538861	275520	275441	SPCC162.11c	SPCC1620.11	SPCC162.11c	nup97	-	mug87	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981176685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757568	2538946	2541627	275520	278123	SPCC162.11c	SPAC1F5.08c	SPCC162.11c	yam8	-	ehs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771794623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757569	2538946	2543076	275520	279509	SPCC162.11c	SPAC30C2.07	SPCC162.11c	SPAC30C2.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.566101871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757570	2538946	2540314	275520	276844	SPCC162.11c	SPBC2G5.03	SPCC162.11c	ctu1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.330389515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757571	2538946	2542566	275520	279022	SPCC162.11c	SPAC8C9.12c	SPCC162.11c	SPAC8C9.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.669411314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757572	2538946	2540626	275520	277152	SPCC162.11c	SPBC21C3.08c	SPCC162.11c	car2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992724074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757573	2538946	2538947	275520	275521	SPCC162.11c	SPCC1682.12c	SPCC162.11c	ubp16	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.403251898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757574	2538946	2542111	275520	278587	SPCC162.11c	SPAC1687.14c	SPCC162.11c	SPAC1687.14c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.388962298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757575	2538946	2542460	275520	278921	SPCC162.11c	SPAC1F12.03c	SPCC162.11c	SPAC1F12.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205189603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757576	2538946	2540309	275520	276839	SPCC162.11c	SPBC21B10.13c	SPCC162.11c	yox1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.340208162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757577	2538946	3361295	275520	280371	SPCC162.11c	SPBC1921.01c	SPCC162.11c	rpl35b	-	rpl37|rpl37-1|rpl3701|SPBC29C10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57195244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757578	2538946	2542943	275520	279384	SPCC162.11c	SPBC1348.03	SPCC162.11c	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.533859483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757579	2538946	2542561	275520	279017	SPCC162.11c	SPAC31G5.17c	SPCC162.11c	rps1001	-	rps10-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639260001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757580	2538946	2541732	275520	278226	SPCC162.11c	SPAC22H10.08	SPCC162.11c	SPAC22H10.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925727319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757581	2538946	2543501	275520	279919	SPCC162.11c	SPAC664.14	SPCC162.11c	amt2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.036850261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757582	2538946	2540798	275520	277317	SPCC162.11c	SPBC19C7.01	SPCC162.11c	mni1	-	SPBC32F12.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.270911306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757583	2538946	2542444	275520	278906	SPCC162.11c	SPAC17A5.05c	SPCC162.11c	SPAC17A5.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517987731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757584	2538946	2542578	275520	279034	SPCC162.11c	SPAC18B11.09c	SPCC162.11c	SPAC18B11.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.815433534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757585	2541015	2542318	277530	278784	SPBC409.08	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC409.08	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781666483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757586	2541015	2543396	277530	279818	SPBC409.08	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC409.08	dsc4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.201749127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757587	2541015	2540936	277530	277452	SPBC409.08	SPBC800.05c	SPBC409.08	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.255818561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757588	2541015	2540558	277530	277085	SPBC409.08	SPBC2D10.17	SPBC409.08	clr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.04546114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757589	2540023	2538976	276567	275550	SPBC11C11.10	SPCC1840.04	SPBC11C11.10	pca1	SPBC3B8.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.058103359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757590	2540023	2540979	276567	277495	SPBC11C11.10	SPBC3H7.10	SPBC11C11.10	elp6	SPBC3B8.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329210656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757591	2540023	2542220	276567	278694	SPBC11C11.10	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC11C11.10	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC3B8.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984672578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757592	2540023	2540415	276567	276943	SPBC11C11.10	SPBC30B4.06c	SPBC11C11.10	SPBC30B4.06c	SPBC3B8.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701712819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757593	2540023	2543319	276567	279743	SPBC11C11.10	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC11C11.10	trm10	SPBC3B8.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.553985863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757594	2540023	2539574	276567	276134	SPBC11C11.10	SPCPB16A4.04c	SPBC11C11.10	trm8	SPBC3B8.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.67570264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757595	2540023	2541800	276567	278291	SPBC11C11.10	SPAC732.02c	SPBC11C11.10	SPAC732.02c	SPBC3B8.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.30029337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757596	2540023	2541017	276567	277532	SPBC11C11.10	SPBC36.07	SPBC11C11.10	elp1	SPBC3B8.13c	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.836720699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757597	2540023	2542673	276567	279126	SPBC11C11.10	SPAC26A3.11	SPBC11C11.10	SPAC26A3.11	SPBC3B8.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929785322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757598	2540023	2539246	276567	275816	SPBC11C11.10	SPCC18.13	SPBC11C11.10	SPCC18.13	SPBC3B8.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.706008443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757599	2540023	2539013	276567	275586	SPBC11C11.10	SPCC364.03	SPBC11C11.10	rpl1702	SPBC3B8.13c	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638260574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757600	2540023	2540523	276567	277051	SPBC11C11.10	SPBC29A10.10c	SPBC11C11.10	dbl8	SPBC3B8.13c	SPBC29A10.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.304667697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757601	2540023	2539483	276567	276046	SPBC11C11.10	SPCC584.02	SPBC11C11.10	cuf2	SPBC3B8.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.432837538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757602	2540023	2543387	276567	279809	SPBC11C11.10	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC11C11.10	mcl1	SPBC3B8.13c	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.256318388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757603	2542363	2542928	278827	279369	SPAC1783.05	SPAC1142.06	hrp1	get3	chd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927695014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757604	2542363	2542358	278827	278823	SPAC1783.05	SPAC1782.09c	hrp1	clp1	chd1	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.127373719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757605	2542363	2540347	278827	276876	SPAC1783.05	SPBC30B4.08	hrp1	eri1	chd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447541642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757606	2542363	2542743	278827	279193	SPAC1783.05	SPAC6F6.04c	hrp1	SPAC6F6.04c	chd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331096427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757607	2542363	2538806	278827	275387	SPAC1783.05	SPCC1840.09	hrp1	SPCC1840.09	chd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.558373083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757608	2542363	2539226	278827	275796	SPAC1783.05	SPCC16C4.20c	hrp1	SPCC16C4.20c	chd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577705871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757609	2542363	2540425	278827	276953	SPAC1783.05	SPBC27.06c	hrp1	mgr2	chd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.836678593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757610	2542363	2542318	278827	278784	SPAC1783.05	SPAC16C9.05	hrp1	cph1	chd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.295328469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757611	2542363	2540595	278827	277121	SPAC1783.05	SPBC21C3.02c	hrp1	dep1	chd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.985230117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757612	2542363	2543563	278827	279979	SPAC1783.05	SPAC664.02c	hrp1	arp8	chd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.095856404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757613	2542363	2541522	278827	278023	SPAC1783.05	SPAC23E2.01	hrp1	fep1	chd1	gaf2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095685448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757614	2542363	2539381	278827	275947	SPAC1783.05	SPCC1739.10	hrp1	mug33	chd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.8734759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757615	2542363	2540825	278827	277343	SPAC1783.05	SPBC428.08c	hrp1	clr4	chd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.878383225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757616	2542363	2541379	278827	277890	SPAC1783.05	SPBP8B7.27	hrp1	mug30	chd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154722371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757617	2542363	2540797	278827	277316	SPAC1783.05	SPBC18H10.11c	hrp1	ppr2	chd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.048765738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757618	2542363	2540886	278827	277403	SPAC1783.05	SPBC4F6.10	hrp1	vps901	chd1	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.449694908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757619	2542363	2539284	278827	275852	SPAC1783.05	SPCC584.15c	hrp1	SPCC584.15c	chd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.9307821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757620	2542363	2542976	278827	279414	SPAC1783.05	SPAC9E9.09c	hrp1	atd1	chd1	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.254261682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757621	2542363	2542070	278827	278547	SPAC1783.05	SPAC29B12.02c	hrp1	set2	chd1	kmt3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04852764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757622	2542363	2541900	278827	278390	SPAC1783.05	SPAC23H4.17c	hrp1	srb10	chd1	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320693748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757623	2542363	2541009	278827	277524	SPAC1783.05	SPBC428.04	hrp1	apq12	chd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.126987487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757624	2542363	2538848	278827	275429	SPAC1783.05	SPCC613.12c	hrp1	raf1	chd1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.514030593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757625	2542363	2539013	278827	275586	SPAC1783.05	SPCC364.03	hrp1	rpl1702	chd1	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640571566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757626	2542363	2542442	278827	278904	SPAC1783.05	SPACUNK12.02c	hrp1	cmk1	chd1	CaMK-I|SPAC25D11.02C	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379190117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757627	2542363	2543387	278827	279809	SPAC1783.05	SPAPB1E7.02c	hrp1	mcl1	chd1	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.687231717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757628	2542363	2543472	278827	279892	SPAC1783.05	SPAC959.04c	hrp1	omh6	chd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.389343341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757629	2542363	2541297	278827	277809	SPAC1783.05	SPBC9B6.07	hrp1	nop52	chd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.565169574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757630	2543378	2542598	279800	279052	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAC6G10.08	pac10	idp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.61288854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757631	2543378	2541552	279800	278051	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAC1142.08	pac10	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.832319551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757632	2543378	2542237	279800	278709	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAC19E9.02	pac10	fin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.01023539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757633	2543378	2540686	279800	277211	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC21D10.10	pac10	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.101646174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757634	2543378	2539309	279800	275876	SPAC3H8.07c	SPCC4G3.19	pac10	alp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.982137616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757635	2543378	2540664	279800	277189	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC215.02	pac10	bob1	-	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.837879076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757636	2543378	2540999	279800	277515	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC4B4.04	pac10	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.402449138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757637	2543378	2538847	279800	275428	SPAC3H8.07c	SPCC594.06c	pac10	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.410077172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757638	2543378	2539443	279800	276006	SPAC3H8.07c	SPCC736.02	pac10	SPCC736.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991784851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757639	2543378	2542023	279800	278506	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAC20H4.10	pac10	ufd2	-	SPAC145.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.254330519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757640	2543378	2540851	279800	277368	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC4F6.04	pac10	rpl2502	-	rpl23a-2|rpl25b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815021961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757641	2543378	2543563	279800	279979	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAC664.02c	pac10	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.828826499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757642	2543378	2538906	279800	275483	SPAC3H8.07c	SPCC1259.03	pac10	rpa12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194585897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757643	2543378	2541021	279800	277536	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC3B8.10c	pac10	nem1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.407132983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757644	2543378	2542568	279800	279024	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAC1952.02	pac10	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.257275136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757645	2543378	2542513	279800	278971	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAC1952.05	pac10	gcn5	-	kat2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.013628279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757646	2543378	2539733	279800	276285	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC16E9.12c	pac10	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.175069273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757647	2543378	2540396	279800	276924	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC31F10.12	pac10	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.902377028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757648	2543378	2541496	279800	277998	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAC23D3.09	pac10	arp42	-	arp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.922035849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757649	2543378	2539667	279800	276222	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC13G1.08c	pac10	ash2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.89710433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757650	2543378	2540751	279800	277273	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC20F10.10	pac10	psl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200069818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757651	2543378	2539958	279800	276502	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC1718.07c	pac10	zfs1	-	moc4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.806868062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757652	2543378	2540318	279800	276848	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC30B4.04c	pac10	sol1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387607828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757653	2543378	2539953	279800	276497	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC1709.11c	pac10	png2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.978940182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757654	2543378	2538926	279800	275502	SPAC3H8.07c	SPCC306.07c	pac10	SPCC306.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.594067002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757655	2543378	2539847	279800	276395	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC530.14c	pac10	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.737091666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757656	2543378	2543315	279800	279739	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAC6B12.07c	pac10	SPAC6B12.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392167275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757657	2543378	2541614	279800	278111	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAC29A4.20	pac10	elp3	-	kat9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.354820437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757658	2543378	2538690	279800	275275	SPAC3H8.07c	SPCC1393.05	pac10	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.829658655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757659	2543378	2542829	279800	279276	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAC13D6.02c	pac10	byr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579054368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757660	2543378	2538848	279800	275429	SPAC3H8.07c	SPCC613.12c	pac10	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.630723003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757661	2543378	2539908	279800	276454	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC13E7.06	pac10	msd1	-	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.67533902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757662	2543378	2542198	279800	278673	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAC6F12.09	pac10	rdp1	-	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.052701427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757663	2543378	2539160	279800	275732	SPAC3H8.07c	SPCC18.17c	pac10	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.782342448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757664	2543378	2538762	279800	275345	SPAC3H8.07c	SPCC306.04c	pac10	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.877971901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757665	2543378	2543619	279800	280033	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAC4F10.04	pac10	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.565999595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757666	2543378	2543071	279800	279504	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAC3C7.06c	pac10	pit1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.161605103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757667	2543378	2541175	279800	277689	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC839.13c	pac10	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.209330155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757668	2543378	2540498	279800	277026	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC27.02c	pac10	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.802435948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757669	2543378	2540779	279800	277298	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC19F8.06c	pac10	meu22	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875752085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757670	2543378	2540800	279800	277319	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC409.20c	pac10	psh3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0435305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757671	2543378	2543304	279800	279728	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAC6B12.12	pac10	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.895511146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757672	2543378	2540998	279800	277514	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC3D6.05	pac10	ptp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.123329386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757673	2543378	2541531	279800	278031	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAC25A8.01c	pac10	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.905826979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757674	2543378	2540325	279800	276855	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC21B10.10	pac10	rps402	-	rps4-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.335983193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757675	2543378	2539928	279800	276472	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC1604.08c	pac10	imp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713273982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757676	2543378	2539702	279800	276255	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC1604.12	pac10	SPBC1604.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323912985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757677	2543378	2540146	279800	276683	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC17A3.06	pac10	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036991133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757678	2543378	2539178	279800	275749	SPAC3H8.07c	SPCC1682.14	pac10	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.263777698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757679	2543378	2539700	279800	276253	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC1685.15c	pac10	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.74005968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757680	2543378	2543372	279800	279794	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAPB1A10.09	pac10	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.576466758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757681	2543064	2538961	279497	275535	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC285.14	hrp3	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.260631785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757682	2543064	2542577	279497	279033	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC19G12.15c	hrp3	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.292403895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757683	2543064	2540105	279497	276642	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC106.04	hrp3	ada1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808522375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757684	2543064	2539405	279497	275970	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC553.03	hrp3	pex1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813476111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757685	2543064	2543617	279497	280031	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC4A8.10	hrp3	SPAC4A8.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.870184931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757686	2543064	2541343	279497	277854	SPAC3G6.01	SPBPB2B2.19c	hrp3	SPBPB2B2.19c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643890524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757687	2543064	2541426	279497	277931	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC227.06	hrp3	SPAC227.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.133126265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757688	2543064	2540026	279497	276570	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC16D10.08c	hrp3	hsp104	-	SPBC16D10.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515803057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757689	2543064	2542812	279497	279259	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC6F6.01	hrp3	cch1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577575667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757690	2543064	2541818	279497	278309	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC11G7.02	hrp3	pub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.28179983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757691	2543064	2542671	279497	279124	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC824.09c	hrp3	SPAC824.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447797819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757692	2543064	2542643	279497	279097	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC2C4.07c	hrp3	dis32	-	SPAC2C4.07c|dis3L2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.457248457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757693	2543064	2539156	279497	275728	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC1450.08c	hrp3	wtf16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318755314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757694	2543064	2542293	279497	278761	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC17G8.14c	hrp3	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.691639063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757695	2543064	2543592	279497	280007	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC4F10.18	hrp3	nup37	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.816942368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757696	2543064	2539035	279497	275608	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC794.09c	hrp3	tef101	-	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.60483925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757697	2543064	2541135	279497	277650	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC839.03c	hrp3	SPBC839.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.302690522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757698	2543064	2540068	279497	276606	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC1734.12c	hrp3	alg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388562738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757699	2543064	2538857	279497	275437	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC1442.05c	hrp3	SPCC1442.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.270320133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757700	2543064	2539196	279497	275767	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC1795.03	hrp3	gms1	-	gmn3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.910617427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757701	2543064	2543652	279497	280066	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC4H3.03c	hrp3	SPAC4H3.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.322881686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757702	2543064	2542614	279497	279068	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC1399.04c	hrp3	SPAC1399.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930183384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757703	2543064	2540686	279497	277211	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC21D10.10	hrp3	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.599809837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757704	2543064	2539201	279497	275772	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC188.09c	hrp3	pfl4	-	SPCC188.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.771984268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757705	2543064	2538922	279497	275499	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC16C4.10	hrp3	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.594718511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757706	2543064	2542345	279497	278811	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC1705.02	hrp3	SPAC1705.02	-	SPAC1F2.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318764229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757707	2543064	2540491	279497	277019	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC28E12.04	hrp3	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.662579387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757708	2543064	2542613	279497	279067	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC18B11.03c	hrp3	SPAC18B11.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037348945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757709	2543064	2538806	279497	275387	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC1840.09	hrp3	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.991453975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757710	2543064	2543320	279497	279744	SPAC3G6.01	SPAPJ695.01c	hrp3	SPAPJ695.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.990191491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757711	2543064	2539226	279497	275796	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC16C4.20c	hrp3	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.438157621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757712	2543064	2540975	279497	277491	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC354.12	hrp3	gpd3	-	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.723585168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757713	2543064	2543661	279497	280075	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC644.08	hrp3	SPAC644.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.451945016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757714	2543064	2542107	279497	278583	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC30.01c	hrp3	sec72	-	sec7b|sec702	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.066172941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757715	2543064	2540979	279497	277495	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC3H7.10	hrp3	elp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.557926662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757716	2543064	2538847	279497	275428	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC594.06c	hrp3	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.009923432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757717	2543064	2540029	279497	276573	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC16A3.01	hrp3	spn3	-	SPBC543.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814187867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757718	2543064	2542724	279497	279175	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC767.01c	hrp3	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928476453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757719	2543064	2539576	279497	276136	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC794.01c	hrp3	zwf2	-	SPCC794.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.666180115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757720	2543064	2543453	279497	279873	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC3G9.03	hrp3	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.588958949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757721	2543064	2541026	279497	277541	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC337.09	hrp3	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.116463646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757722	2543064	2540313	279497	276843	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC337.04	hrp3	ppk27	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321611423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757723	2543064	2540220	279497	276753	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC337.03	hrp3	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.011628716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757724	2543064	2539575	279497	276135	SPAC3G6.01	SPCP20C8.02c	hrp3	SPCP20C8.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.504120197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757725	2543064	2541119	279497	277634	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC651.11c	hrp3	apm3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.150958765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757726	2543064	2541346	279497	277857	SPAC3G6.01	SPBP8B7.08c	hrp3	ppm1	-	SPBP8B7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.325809809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757727	2543064	2539302	279497	275870	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC126.09	hrp3	zip2	-	SPCC126.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.103183692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757728	2543064	2540727	279497	277250	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC1921.03c	hrp3	mex67	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.45864383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757729	2543064	2542165	279497	278641	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC1782.08c	hrp3	rex3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875813979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757730	2543064	2540425	279497	276953	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC27.06c	hrp3	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.952953323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757731	2543064	2541424	279497	277929	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC23G3.04	hrp3	ies4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.140444568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757732	2543064	2542318	279497	278784	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC16C9.05	hrp3	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.763503525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757733	2543064	2541560	279497	278059	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC24B11.12c	hrp3	SPAC24B11.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702694625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757734	2543064	2542277	279497	278746	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC17A5.02c	hrp3	dbr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.356598187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757735	2543064	2539721	279497	276274	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC146.04	hrp3	SPBC146.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.150457448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757736	2543064	2543685	279497	280099	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC3C7.03c	hrp3	rad55	-	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.907586853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757737	2543064	2540467	279497	276995	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC2G2.07c	hrp3	mug178	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.742114784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757738	2543064	2540595	279497	277121	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC21C3.02c	hrp3	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.316779304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757739	2543064	2539175	279497	275746	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC16C4.01	hrp3	sif2	-	SPCC5E4.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.075441463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757740	2543064	2543686	279497	280100	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC3C7.14c	hrp3	obr1	-	apt1|uhp1|p25	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.250465107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757741	2543064	2540540	279497	277067	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC23E6.10c	hrp3	SPBC23E6.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869290275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757742	2543064	2543563	279497	279979	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC664.02c	hrp3	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.00851823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757743	2543064	2538698	279497	275283	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC1442.02	hrp3	SPCC1442.02	-	SPCC1450.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.618007722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757744	2543064	2541905	279497	278395	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC6G9.01c	hrp3	SPAC6G9.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.341457449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757745	2543064	2539100	279497	275672	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC330.12c	hrp3	sdh3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87192809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757746	2543064	2543319	279497	279743	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC6B12.09	hrp3	trm10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.014927028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757747	2543064	2542981	279497	279419	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC824.02	hrp3	bst1	-	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197821958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757748	2543064	2539478	279497	276041	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC550.07	hrp3	SPCC550.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810613117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757749	2543064	3361543	279497	280619	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC9.13c	hrp3	cwf16	-	SPAPJ735.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.17820869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757750	2543064	2540893	279497	277409	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC543.10	hrp3	get1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.022781714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757751	2543064	2542331	279497	278797	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC1834.05	hrp3	alg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444585463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757752	2543064	2542239	279497	278711	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC18G6.02c	hrp3	chp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582691694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757753	2543064	2542033	279497	278515	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC2C4.09	hrp3	SPAC2C4.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98443175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757754	2543064	2539023	279497	275596	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC594.05c	hrp3	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.267820396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757755	2543064	2539339	279497	275905	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC1494.03	hrp3	arz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.405751714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757756	2543064	2541885	279497	278375	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC22H10.03c	hrp3	kap114	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.327837805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757757	2543064	2539051	279497	275624	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC1183.11	hrp3	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.385494683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757758	2543064	2541649	279497	278145	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC1F3.06c	hrp3	spo15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327859237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757759	2543064	2541035	279497	277550	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC3E7.05c	hrp3	SPBC3E7.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262209947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757760	2543064	2541801	279497	278292	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC2F7.08c	hrp3	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580694716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757761	2543064	2541249	279497	277763	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC947.01	hrp3	alf1	-	SPBC947.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.548005156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757762	2543064	2541776	279497	278270	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC23H3.05c	hrp3	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.45303301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757763	2543064	2541093	279497	277608	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC646.08c	hrp3	SPBC646.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869084266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757764	2543064	2540192	279497	276725	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC1215.01	hrp3	shy1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.339291007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757765	2543064	2543144	279497	279576	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC3F10.05c	hrp3	mug113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.763398272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757766	2543064	2541160	279497	277675	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC725.09c	hrp3	hob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.505809464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757767	2543064	2540338	279497	276867	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC2G2.13c	hrp3	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.559677678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757768	2543064	2541892	279497	278382	SPAC3G6.01	SPAP27G11.02	hrp3	SPAP27G11.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987936165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757769	2543064	2542123	279497	278599	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC18G6.15	hrp3	mal3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.092312241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757770	2543064	2543412	279497	279834	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC637.07	hrp3	moe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699725536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757771	2543064	2539754	279497	276306	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC16C6.04	hrp3	dbl6	-	SPBC16C6.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645607943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757772	2543064	2539733	279497	276285	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC16E9.12c	hrp3	pab2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.351757814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757773	2543064	2540396	279497	276924	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC31F10.12	hrp3	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775144055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757774	2543064	2540673	279497	277198	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC1D7.03	hrp3	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.046628335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757775	2543064	2542543	279497	279000	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC30D11.11	hrp3	SPAC30D11.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934925386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757776	2543064	2539898	279497	276444	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC12D12.07c	hrp3	trx2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.792410367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757777	2543064	2542469	279497	278930	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC19A8.04	hrp3	erg5	-	cyp61	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.407892448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757778	2543064	2539999	279497	276543	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC1734.15	hrp3	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.096819605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757779	2543064	2541496	279497	277998	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC23D3.09	hrp3	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.515022909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757780	2543064	2539603	279497	276161	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC1289.06c	hrp3	ppr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.108064092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757781	2543064	2539689	279497	276244	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC1861.03	hrp3	mak10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.978829675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757782	2543064	2539857	279497	276404	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC1604.20c	hrp3	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.892453611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757783	2543064	2541532	279497	278032	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC2C4.15c	hrp3	ubx2	-	ucp13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.265320085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757784	2543064	2540086	279497	276624	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC16H5.12c	hrp3	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.750764035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757785	2543064	2541187	279497	277701	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC776.14	hrp3	plh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.919998429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757786	2543064	2539667	279497	276222	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC13G1.08c	hrp3	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.22070295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757787	2543064	3361269	279497	280345	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC31A8.01c	hrp3	rtn1	-	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.689894888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757788	2543064	2540665	279497	277190	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC83.02c	hrp3	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865524802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757789	2543064	2542014	279497	278497	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC20H4.04	hrp3	fml2	-	mfh2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.40701866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757790	2543064	2542007	279497	278490	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC20H4.07	hrp3	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.978966616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757791	2543064	2538774	279497	275356	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC162.06c	hrp3	SPCC162.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.267912612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757792	2543064	2541955	279497	278442	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC5D6.04	hrp3	SPAC5D6.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865993646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757793	2543064	2540256	279497	276787	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC32F12.12c	hrp3	SPBC32F12.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931831116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757794	2543064	2538945	279497	275519	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC1739.06c	hrp3	SPCC1739.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044505721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757795	2543064	2542946	279497	279386	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC6F12.03c	hrp3	fsv1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038048768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757796	2543064	2539815	279497	276365	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC1105.02c	hrp3	lys4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642158503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757797	2543064	2540107	279497	276644	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC106.08c	hrp3	mug2	-	B13958-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86723835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757798	2543064	2543253	279497	279681	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC8C9.05	hrp3	SPAC8C9.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.765548082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757799	2543064	2540394	279497	276922	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC2D10.09	hrp3	snr1	-	SPBC2D10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.403237502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757800	2543064	2540077	279497	276615	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC17D11.04c	hrp3	nto1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.614373935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757801	2543064	2540374	279497	276903	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC31F10.02	hrp3	SPBC31F10.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988042188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757802	2543064	2543301	279497	279726	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC977.17	hrp3	SPAC977.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.626471776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757803	2543064	2540318	279497	276848	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC30B4.04c	hrp3	sol1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.850181479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757804	2543064	2541009	279497	277524	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC428.04	hrp3	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.490449888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757805	2543064	2540990	279497	277506	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC36B7.06c	hrp3	mug20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645308169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757806	2543064	2543119	279497	279551	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC3A11.07	hrp3	nde2	-	SPAC3A11.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.466904021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757807	2543064	2539368	279497	275934	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC16A11.07	hrp3	coq10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.075904532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757808	2543064	2538708	279497	275292	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC594.01	hrp3	SPCC594.01	-	SPCC736.16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.260497597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757809	2543064	2541142	279497	277657	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC725.04	hrp3	SPBC725.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818164499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757810	2543064	2540342	279497	276871	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC2G2.01c	hrp3	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454613158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757811	2543064	2543307	279497	279731	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC694.05c	hrp3	rps2502	-	rps25|rps25-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.146923687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757812	2543064	2539847	279497	276395	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC530.14c	hrp3	dsk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.158266207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757813	2543064	2543517	279497	279935	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC3G9.05	hrp3	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.941826592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757814	2543064	2541296	279497	277808	SPAC3G6.01	SPBP8B7.06	hrp3	rpp201	-	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.409843839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757815	2543064	2539427	279497	275992	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC663.15c	hrp3	SPCC663.15c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.177391511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757816	2543064	2540533	279497	277061	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC29A10.16c	hrp3	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.381847974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757817	2543064	2542550	279497	279007	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC1B3.02c	hrp3	SPAC1B3.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.127853413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757818	2543064	2539421	279497	275986	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC794.11c	hrp3	ent3	-	SPCC794.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.320122427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757819	2543064	2540926	279497	277442	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC359.06	hrp3	mug14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.768823826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757820	2543064	2539519	279497	276081	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC364.05	hrp3	vps3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819744623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757821	2543064	2540703	279497	277227	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC20F10.07	hrp3	SPBC20F10.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.718427677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757822	2543064	2541742	279497	278236	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC22H10.09	hrp3	SPAC22H10.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.903574495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757823	2543064	2543193	279497	279622	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC3F10.11c	hrp3	abc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.15267077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757824	2543064	2540643	279497	277168	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC19G7.06	hrp3	mbx1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462848962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757825	2543064	2542673	279497	279126	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC26A3.11	hrp3	SPAC26A3.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.151902201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757826	2543064	2540918	279497	277434	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC800.02	hrp3	whi5	-	mug54	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04183651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757827	2543064	2541670	279497	278166	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC24H6.13	hrp3	SPAC24H6.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704543304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757828	2543064	2542806	279497	279254	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC1610.01	hrp3	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.909028012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757829	2543064	2539160	279497	275732	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC18.17c	hrp3	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.818772765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757830	2543064	2539499	279497	276062	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC622.08c	hrp3	hta1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.232972846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757831	2543064	2538762	279497	275345	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC306.04c	hrp3	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.203518513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757832	2543064	2541370	279497	277881	SPAC3G6.01	SPBP8B7.07c	hrp3	set6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.033234116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757833	2543064	2539555	279497	276116	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC4B3.08	hrp3	lsg1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816077434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757834	2543064	2542327	279497	278793	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC16C9.06c	hrp3	upf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.112921595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757835	2543064	2543267	279497	279695	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC1002.12c	hrp3	SPAC1002.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814331106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757836	2543064	2543304	279497	279728	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC6B12.12	hrp3	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.934079468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757837	2543064	2541279	279497	277792	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC8E4.03	hrp3	SPBC8E4.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992548046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757838	2543064	2538714	279497	275298	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC330.11	hrp3	btb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.374561211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757839	2543064	2541100	279497	277615	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC651.04	hrp3	SPBC651.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.976840404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757840	2543064	2541425	279497	277930	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC2C4.17c	hrp3	msy2	-	SPAC2C4.17c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924067959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757841	2543064	2541531	279497	278031	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC25A8.01c	hrp3	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.972759267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757842	2543064	2540325	279497	276855	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC21B10.10	hrp3	rps402	-	rps4-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.132195301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757843	2543064	2543091	279497	279524	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC12G12.15	hrp3	sif3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808559855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757844	2543064	2541404	279497	277913	SPAC3G6.01	SPBPB2B2.18	hrp3	SPBPB2B2.18	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.865627869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757845	2543064	2543602	279497	280017	SPAC3G6.01	SPAPB1A11.04c	hrp3	mca1	-	SPAPB1A11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.195915452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757846	2543064	2543420	279497	279842	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC3H1.04c	hrp3	mdm31	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817669368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757847	2543064	2543183	279497	279612	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC3A12.06c	hrp3	SPAC3A12.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866969452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757848	2543064	2539488	279497	276051	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC645.08c	hrp3	snd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.619999724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757849	2543064	2540555	279497	277082	SPAC3G6.01	SPBP16F5.02	hrp3	mcs2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.115169478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757850	2543064	2543044	279497	279479	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC3C7.12	hrp3	tip1	-	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.401557397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757851	2543064	2540489	279497	277017	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC25H2.03	hrp3	SPBC25H2.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454855704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757852	2543064	2539205	279497	275775	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC4B3.15	hrp3	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.213604398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757853	2543064	2539460	279497	276023	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC4B3.13	hrp3	SPCC4B3.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930056103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757854	2543064	2539726	279497	276278	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC13E7.08c	hrp3	leo1	-	SPBC13E7.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.187544063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757855	2543064	2540896	279497	277412	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC19C2.13c	hrp3	ctu2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.441490779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757856	2543064	2543525	279497	279943	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC4A8.14	hrp3	SPAC4A8.14	-	prs1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872412054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757857	2543064	2540270	279497	276801	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC2G2.02	hrp3	syj1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.856600082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757858	2543064	2543380	279497	279802	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC4G9.16c	hrp3	rpl901	-	rpl9-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.273724645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757859	2543064	2540146	279497	276683	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC17A3.06	hrp3	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.938009249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757860	2543064	2538840	279497	275421	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC736.07c	hrp3	SPCC736.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096678299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757861	2543064	2538792	279497	275373	SPAC3G6.01	SPCP1E11.10	hrp3	SPCP1E11.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.022851689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757862	2543064	2540504	279497	277032	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC24C6.10c	hrp3	dip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.566575385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757863	2543064	2541238	279497	277752	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC8E4.05c	hrp3	SPBC8E4.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256023261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757864	2543064	2543220	279497	279648	SPAC3G6.01	SPAPB21F2.02	hrp3	SPAPB21F2.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147614236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757865	2543064	2539959	279497	276503	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC1703.11	hrp3	SPBC1703.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.890944029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757866	2543064	2542886	279497	279331	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC1486.01	hrp3	SPAC1486.01	-	sod2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.45555962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757867	2543064	2540314	279497	276844	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC2G5.03	hrp3	ctu1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575167751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757868	2543064	2542566	279497	279022	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC8C9.12c	hrp3	SPAC8C9.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.342250046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757869	2543064	2540558	279497	277085	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC2D10.17	hrp3	clr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.406337677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757870	2543064	2539743	279497	276295	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC16A3.08c	hrp3	oga1	-	SPBC16A3.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.670289139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757871	2543064	2541478	279497	277980	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC2F7.17	hrp3	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382001937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757872	2543064	2539731	279497	276283	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC1271.09	hrp3	SPBC1271.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811851389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757873	2543064	2543372	279497	279794	SPAC3G6.01	SPAPB1A10.09	hrp3	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.832369143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757874	2543064	2543333	279497	279756	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC694.02	hrp3	SPAC694.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778686784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757875	2543064	2542943	279497	279384	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC1348.03	hrp3	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.85373442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757876	2543064	2543472	279497	279892	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC959.04c	hrp3	omh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.990869164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757877	2543064	2542561	279497	279017	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC31G5.17c	hrp3	rps1001	-	rps10-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508410579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757878	2543064	3361512	279497	280588	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC3C7.01c	hrp3	sac12	-	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.852741079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757879	2543064	2542617	279497	279071	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC13A11.01c	hrp3	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.186107012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757880	2543064	2541062	279497	277577	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC660.11	hrp3	tcg1	-	mug187	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.286229506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757881	2543064	2541875	279497	278365	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC22F3.06c	hrp3	lon1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.945743722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757882	2543064	2540787	279497	277306	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC1921.07c	hrp3	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.899448561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757883	2543064	2540734	279497	277257	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC19G7.09	hrp3	ulp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036642073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757884	2539615	2540279	276173	276810	SPBC1773.02c	SPBC3B8.04c	bcp1	SPBC3B8.04c	SPBC1773.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.565171995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757885	2539615	2541902	276173	278392	SPBC1773.02c	SPAC27E2.07	bcp1	pvg2	SPBC1773.02c	mug53	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19381796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757886	2539615	2543529	276173	279947	SPBC1773.02c	SPAC4C5.02c	bcp1	ryh1	SPBC1773.02c	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779847609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757887	2539615	2542071	276173	278548	SPBC1773.02c	SPAC26H5.03	bcp1	pcf2	SPBC1773.02c	cac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.683239892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757888	2539615	2543043	276173	279478	SPBC1773.02c	SPAC3F10.13	bcp1	ucp6	SPBC1773.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980694074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757889	2539615	2542627	276173	279081	SPBC1773.02c	SPAC750.04c	bcp1	SPAC750.04c	SPBC1773.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.646888973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757890	2539615	2541541	276173	278041	SPBC1773.02c	SPAC1F7.11c	bcp1	SPAC1F7.11c	SPBC1773.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87542583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757891	2539615	2539981	276173	276525	SPBC1773.02c	SPBC1289.09	bcp1	tim21	SPBC1773.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.632182678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757892	2539615	2540886	276173	277403	SPBC1773.02c	SPBC4F6.10	bcp1	vps901	SPBC1773.02c	vps9a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.80741441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757893	2539615	2540086	276173	276624	SPBC1773.02c	SPBC16H5.12c	bcp1	SPBC16H5.12c	SPBC1773.02c	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.048830146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757894	2539615	2542597	276173	279051	SPBC1773.02c	SPAP8A3.07c	bcp1	SPAP8A3.07c	SPBC1773.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.508871057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757895	2539615	2541017	276173	277532	SPBC1773.02c	SPBC36.07	bcp1	elp1	SPBC1773.02c	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984684972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757896	2539615	2543113	276173	279545	SPBC1773.02c	SPAC3F10.07c	bcp1	erf4	SPBC1773.02c	mug91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81704769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757897	2543583	2542791	279998	279240	SPAC644.12	SPAC167.04	cdc5	pam17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5160616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757898	2543583	2542268	279998	278737	SPAC644.12	SPAC17A5.07c	cdc5	ulp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503304485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757899	2543583	2542177	279998	278652	SPAC644.12	SPAC17H9.08	cdc5	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.693375575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757900	2543583	2538821	279998	275402	SPAC644.12	SPCC584.01c	cdc5	SPCC584.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844999921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757901	2543583	2539898	279998	276444	SPAC644.12	SPBC12D12.07c	cdc5	trx2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.689301591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757902	2541061	2542787	277576	279236	SPBC83.09c	SPAC9G1.08c	lin1	SPAC9G1.08c	SPBC83.09c|snu40	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.14149954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757903	2541061	2541135	277576	277650	SPBC83.09c	SPBC839.03c	lin1	SPBC839.03c	SPBC83.09c|snu40	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.034696089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757904	2541061	2540099	277576	276637	SPBC83.09c	SPBC16H5.11c	lin1	skb1	SPBC83.09c|snu40	rmt5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.312615307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757905	2541061	2542468	277576	278929	SPBC83.09c	SPAC1D4.09c	lin1	rtf2	SPBC83.09c|snu40	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.628608116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757906	2541061	2539984	277576	276528	SPBC83.09c	SPBC1289.11	lin1	spf38	SPBC83.09c|snu40	cwf17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.88719643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757907	2541061	2539293	277576	275861	SPBC83.09c	SPCC553.08c	lin1	ria1	SPBC83.09c|snu40	SPCC553.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.182693894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757908	2541061	2542806	277576	279254	SPBC83.09c	SPAC1610.01	lin1	saf5	SPBC83.09c|snu40	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.330251729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757909	2541061	2543649	277576	280063	SPBC83.09c	SPAC3H5.11	lin1	SPAC3H5.11	SPBC83.09c|snu40	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.325227568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757910	2539728	2542585	276280	279040	SPBC14F5.12c	SPAC31A2.13c	cbh2	sft1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577249791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757911	2539728	2539420	276280	275985	SPBC14F5.12c	SPCC970.07c	cbh2	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810093586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757912	2539728	2539988	276280	276532	SPBC14F5.12c	SPBC1271.05c	cbh2	SPBC1271.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.260832081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757913	2539728	2542710	276280	279163	SPBC14F5.12c	SPAC750.08c	cbh2	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.689989218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757914	2539728	2541531	276280	278031	SPBC14F5.12c	SPAC25A8.01c	cbh2	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567995328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757915	2539728	2543277	276280	279705	SPBC14F5.12c	SPAC1002.03c	cbh2	gls2	-	gls2alpha	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872689326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757916	2539728	2542424	276280	278886	SPBC14F5.12c	SPAC1805.14	cbh2	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.556395364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757917	2540219	2542207	276752	278682	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC17H9.10c	hip1	ddb1	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.565730567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757918	2540219	2541257	276752	277771	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBP23A10.14c	hip1	ell1	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581030981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757919	2540219	2540942	276752	277458	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC3H7.14	hip1	mug176	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.809748274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757920	2540219	2542518	276752	278976	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC1B3.16c	hip1	vht1	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.618866966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757921	2540219	2541343	276752	277854	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBPB2B2.19c	hip1	SPBPB2B2.19c	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.995154094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757922	2540219	2543634	276752	280048	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC3H8.04	hip1	SPAC3H8.04	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.720960933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757923	2540219	2541512	276752	278013	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC11E3.08c	hip1	nse6	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047137606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757924	2540219	2542812	276752	279259	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC6F6.01	hip1	cch1	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872290489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757925	2540219	2541818	276752	278309	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC11G7.02	hip1	pub1	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.907983393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757926	2540219	2543064	276752	279497	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC3G6.01	hip1	hrp3	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.44440646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757927	2540219	2540524	276752	277052	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC21B10.08c	hip1	SPBC21B10.08c	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389474507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757928	2540219	2543339	276752	279762	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC630.13c	hip1	tsc2	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.912203404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757929	2540219	2541135	276752	277650	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC839.03c	hip1	SPBC839.03c	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.07082587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757930	2540219	2538857	276752	275437	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC1442.05c	hip1	SPCC1442.05c	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.331367548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757931	2540219	2539939	276752	276483	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC11G11.01	hip1	fis1	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925034044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757932	2540219	2539068	276752	275640	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC1442.11c	hip1	SPCC1442.11c	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819366289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757933	2540219	2539097	276752	275669	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC757.04	hip1	SPCC757.04	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04144912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757934	2540219	2540410	276752	276938	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC2D10.04	hip1	SPBC2D10.04	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047029534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757935	2540219	2540296	276752	276827	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC2D10.05	hip1	exg3	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.41237658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757936	2540219	2541856	276752	278347	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC23H3.08c	hip1	bub3	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388726146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757937	2540219	2542502	276752	278960	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC139.06	hip1	hat1	hir1	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.193506442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757938	2540219	2541345	276752	277856	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBP35G2.07	hip1	ilv1	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.359699327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757939	2540219	2540347	276752	276876	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC30B4.08	hip1	eri1	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.698544271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757940	2540219	2540139	276752	276676	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC1773.06c	hip1	adh8	hir1	SPBC1773.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153754042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757941	2540219	2542614	276752	279068	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC1399.04c	hip1	SPAC1399.04c	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.124820675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757942	2540219	2540686	276752	277211	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC21D10.10	hip1	bdc1	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.343612582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757943	2540219	2539028	276752	275601	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC1281.07c	hip1	SPCC1281.07c	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19387492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757944	2540219	2542103	276752	278579	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC31G5.11	hip1	pac2	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.048069648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757945	2540219	2542613	276752	279067	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC18B11.03c	hip1	SPAC18B11.03c	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.8751979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757946	2540219	2540560	276752	277087	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC2D10.14c	hip1	myo51	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326343511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757947	2540219	2542677	276752	279130	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC26F1.10c	hip1	pyp1	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.497236674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757948	2540219	2539970	276752	276514	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC1773.01	hip1	far8	hir1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.496969688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757949	2540219	2542273	276752	278742	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC17H9.13c	hip1	SPAC17H9.13c	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.02791036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757950	2540219	2541058	276752	277573	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC3H7.09	hip1	erf2	hir1	mug142	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451410076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757951	2540219	2542714	276752	279167	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC5H10.06c	hip1	adh4	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867948488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757952	2540219	2543043	276752	279478	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC3F10.13	hip1	ucp6	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199835806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757953	2540219	2542696	276752	279149	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC29B12.03	hip1	spd1	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.544050068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757954	2540219	2542299	276752	278766	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC18B11.10	hip1	tup11	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.907650372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757955	2540219	2542689	276752	279142	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC29B12.04	hip1	snz1	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.945525056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757956	2540219	2543453	276752	279873	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC3G9.03	hip1	rpl2301	hir1	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.984322046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757957	2540219	2539575	276752	276135	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCP20C8.02c	hip1	SPCP20C8.02c	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149082833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757958	2540219	2543048	276752	279483	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC3F10.02c	hip1	trk1	hir1	sptrk	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194239824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757959	2540219	2539937	276752	276481	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC1539.08	hip1	arf6	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.184496928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757960	2540219	2543636	276752	280050	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC3H8.08c	hip1	SPAC3H8.08c	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988566474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757961	2540219	2540463	276752	276991	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC2F12.15c	hip1	pfa3	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922532028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757962	2540219	2540425	276752	276953	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC27.06c	hip1	mgr2	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.871985428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757963	2540219	2541424	276752	277929	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC23G3.04	hip1	ies4	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.121195416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757964	2540219	2542318	276752	278784	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC16C9.05	hip1	cph1	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.647770591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757965	2540219	2541527	276752	278027	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC31A2.09c	hip1	apm4	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448109054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757966	2540219	2540482	276752	277010	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC25H2.14	hip1	mug16	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851581162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757967	2540219	2543308	276752	279732	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC694.04c	hip1	SPAC694.04c	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.263889435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757968	2540219	2541960	276752	278447	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC6G9.15c	hip1	SPAC6G9.15c	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.255904339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757969	2540219	2541580	276752	278077	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC1687.05	hip1	pli1	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.962282529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757970	2540219	2539175	276752	275746	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC16C4.01	hip1	sif2	hir1	SPCC5E4.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.674738435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757971	2540219	2539244	276752	275814	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC1672.06c	hip1	asp1	hir1	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.313599525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757972	2540219	2540059	276752	276597	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC1198.01	hip1	fmd2	hir1	SPBC1198.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.103547258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757973	2540219	2539100	276752	275672	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC330.12c	hip1	sdh3	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.927529966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757974	2540219	2540415	276752	276943	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC30B4.06c	hip1	SPBC30B4.06c	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.412422322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757975	2540219	2539092	276752	275664	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC1259.08	hip1	SPCC1259.08	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503311337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757976	2540219	2542981	276752	279419	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC824.02	hip1	bst1	hir1	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.083273278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757977	2540219	2540825	276752	277343	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC428.08c	hip1	clr4	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.853058589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757978	2540219	2541020	276752	277535	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC354.04	hip1	SPBC354.04	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872452575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757979	2540219	2540359	276752	276888	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC30D10.14	hip1	SPBC30D10.14	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775437711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757980	2540219	2540893	276752	277409	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC543.10	hip1	get1	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638740585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757981	2540219	2539310	276752	275877	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC285.17	hip1	spp27	hir1	uaf30	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922280904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757982	2540219	2542554	276752	279011	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC1952.03	hip1	otu2	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98429469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757983	2540219	2542239	276752	278711	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC18G6.02c	hip1	chp1	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.565807737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757984	2540219	2539960	276752	276504	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC15D4.15	hip1	pho2	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568292622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757985	2540219	2539467	276752	276030	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC417.07c	hip1	mto1	hir1	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330101035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757986	2540219	2542311	276752	278777	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC16A10.05c	hip1	dad1	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.617236733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757987	2540219	2543020	276752	279456	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC10F6.13c	hip1	SPAC10F6.13c	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.914555477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757988	2540219	2542177	276752	278652	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC17H9.08	hip1	SPAC17H9.08	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.978660717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757989	2540219	2540931	276752	277447	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC365.07c	hip1	SPBC365.07c	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.18739123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757990	2540219	2541392	276752	277902	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBPB10D8.04c	hip1	SPBPB10D8.04c	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.196494665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757991	2540219	2541801	276752	278292	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC2F7.08c	hip1	snf5	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924354283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757992	2540219	2541776	276752	278270	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC23H3.05c	hip1	swd1	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.934496211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757993	2540219	2540192	276752	276725	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC1215.01	hip1	shy1	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145606366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757994	2540219	2543144	276752	279576	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC3F10.05c	hip1	mug113	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.339591877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757995	2540219	2542249	276752	278719	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC30D11.14c	hip1	SPAC30D11.14c	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509419527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757996	2540219	2542652	276752	279106	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC1687.15	hip1	gsk3	hir1	skp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.763018424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757997	2540219	2542463	276752	278924	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC1834.03c	hip1	hhf1	hir1	h4.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.064039143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757998	2540219	2542776	276752	279225	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC167.01	hip1	ire1	hir1	ppk4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512883115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
757999	2540219	2540348	276752	276877	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC29A10.05	hip1	exo1	hir1	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445752022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758000	2540219	2542123	276752	278599	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC18G6.15	hip1	mal3	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329101726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758001	2540219	2543412	276752	279834	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC637.07	hip1	moe1	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.988240185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758002	2540219	2540673	276752	277198	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC1D7.03	hip1	mug80	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453709023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758003	2540219	2541735	276752	278229	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC7D4.04	hip1	atg11	hir1	taf1|cvt9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980140666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758004	2540219	2542464	276752	278925	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC1A6.09c	hip1	lag1	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979380089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758005	2540219	2541928	276752	278416	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC227.03c	hip1	SPAC227.03c	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.413000001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758006	2540219	2539999	276752	276543	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC1734.15	hip1	rsc4	hir1	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.549672907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758007	2540219	2543313	276752	279737	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAPJ691.03	hip1	SPAPJ691.03	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099127416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758008	2540219	2543363	276752	279785	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAPB24D3.09c	hip1	pdr1	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386558924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758009	2540219	2540086	276752	276624	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC16H5.12c	hip1	SPBC16H5.12c	hir1	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.711518658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758010	2540219	2543250	276752	279678	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC3G9.15c	hip1	fcf2	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.120697991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758011	2540219	2543396	276752	279818	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC4D7.11	hip1	dsc4	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.713959917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758012	2540219	2543406	276752	279828	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC9.12c	hip1	atp12	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.747629972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758013	2540219	2538769	276752	275352	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC126.04c	hip1	sgf73	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.49797044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758014	2540219	2542126	276752	278602	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC1B3.05	hip1	not3	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.402702701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758015	2540219	2540194	276752	276727	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC1709.09	hip1	rrf1	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.266435402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758016	2540219	2542007	276752	278490	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC20H4.07	hip1	rad57	hir1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.806486885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758017	2540219	2540997	276752	277513	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC3H7.06c	hip1	pof9	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.491988041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758018	2540219	2538873	276752	275452	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC306.11	hip1	SPCC306.11	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981313985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758019	2540219	2541828	276752	278319	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC22H12.05c	hip1	fsc1	hir1	SPAC22H12.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.93368119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758020	2540219	2541955	276752	278442	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC5D6.04	hip1	SPAC5D6.04	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818473873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758021	2540219	2542946	276752	279386	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC6F12.03c	hip1	fsv1	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.404577744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758022	2540219	2540394	276752	276922	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC2D10.09	hip1	snr1	hir1	SPBC2D10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.412119606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758023	2540219	2540836	276752	277354	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC18H10.19	hip1	vps38	hir1	atg14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.612096727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758024	2540219	2538841	276752	275422	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC550.03c	hip1	SPCC550.03c	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.899808462	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758025	2540219	2542254	276752	278724	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC30D11.04c	hip1	nup124	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.26380169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758026	2540219	2541900	276752	278390	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC23H4.17c	hip1	srb10	hir1	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.981287404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758027	2540219	2543301	276752	279726	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC977.17	hip1	SPAC977.17	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713143185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758028	2540219	2540318	276752	276848	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC30B4.04c	hip1	sol1	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808801766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758029	2540219	2542519	276752	278977	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC19G12.08	hip1	scs7	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.35913842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758030	2540219	2541009	276752	277524	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC428.04	hip1	apq12	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.147091838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758031	2540219	2542919	276752	279360	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC6C3.08	hip1	nas6	hir1	SPAC6C3.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.827777522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758032	2540219	2540387	276752	276915	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC24C6.04	hip1	SPBC24C6.04	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.993136033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758033	2540219	2541464	276752	277966	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC222.08c	hip1	SPAC222.08c	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.318963005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758034	2540219	2540967	276752	277483	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC36B7.08c	hip1	SPBC36B7.08c	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.265123345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758035	2540219	2542597	276752	279051	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAP8A3.07c	hip1	SPAP8A3.07c	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.458617104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758036	2540219	2539172	276752	275743	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC1020.08	hip1	SPCC1020.08	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.516972952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758037	2540219	2540533	276752	277061	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC29A10.16c	hip1	SPBC29A10.16c	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.198678742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758038	2540219	2538690	276752	275275	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC1393.05	hip1	ers1	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.153128614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758039	2540219	2542829	276752	279276	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC13D6.02c	hip1	byr3	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510913873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758040	2540219	3361134	276752	280210	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC737.09c	hip1	hmt1	hir1	SPCC74.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44094156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758041	2540219	2540926	276752	277442	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC359.06	hip1	mug14	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.907643982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758042	2540219	2541963	276752	278449	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC21E11.04	hip1	aca1	hir1	ppr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.545550285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758043	2540219	2538848	276752	275429	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC613.12c	hip1	raf1	hir1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.87208007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758044	2540219	2541713	276752	278208	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC3A12.12	hip1	atp11	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201454284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758045	2540219	2539538	276752	276100	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC364.06	hip1	nap1	hir1	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447119328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758046	2540219	2543113	276752	279545	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC3F10.07c	hip1	erf4	hir1	mug91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.91231547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758047	2540219	2539476	276752	276039	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC364.04c	hip1	coy1	hir1	SPCC364.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094286521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758048	2540219	2539160	276752	275732	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC18.17c	hip1	SPCC18.17c	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.848673093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758049	2540219	2543398	276752	279820	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC4A8.02c	hip1	SPAC4A8.02c	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.273644605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758050	2540219	2543332	276752	279755	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAPB8E5.04c	hip1	SPAPB8E5.04c	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.127180216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758051	2540219	2540442	276752	276970	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC25B2.04c	hip1	mtg1	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.266362053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758052	2540219	3361389	276752	280465	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC977.13c	hip1	SPAC977.13c	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811796319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758053	2540219	2540226	276752	276758	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC32H8.08c	hip1	omh5	hir1	pi016|SPACTOKYO_453.20	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820373615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758054	2540219	2539499	276752	276062	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC622.08c	hip1	hta1	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.501644332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758055	2540219	2542619	276752	279073	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC6G10.02c	hip1	tea3	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.847511045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758056	2540219	2543628	276752	280042	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC3H8.10	hip1	spo20	hir1	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.414298879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758057	2540219	2543106	276752	279538	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC3A11.13	hip1	SPAC3A11.13	hir1	SPAC3H5.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.560869354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758058	2540219	2539813	276752	276363	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC14C8.11c	hip1	SPBC14C8.11c	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935364234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758059	2540219	2542881	276752	279326	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC13F5.03c	hip1	gld1	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.976348459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758060	2540219	2542515	276752	278973	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC1952.09c	hip1	SPAC1952.09c	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.927213374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758061	2540219	2540800	276752	277319	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC409.20c	hip1	psh3	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.489184767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758062	2540219	2538966	276752	275540	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC18.10	hip1	SPCC18.10	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.668532975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758063	2540219	2540600	276752	277126	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC4.05	hip1	mlo2	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820166639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758064	2540219	2539239	276752	275809	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC1020.10	hip1	oca2	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935565732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758065	2540219	2539359	276752	275925	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC16C4.06c	hip1	pus3	hir1	SPCC16C4.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.010178228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758066	2540219	2541114	276752	277629	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC582.09	hip1	pex11	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.92937967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758067	2540219	2540699	276752	277223	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC800.08	hip1	gcd10	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.333058078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758068	2540219	2540829	276752	277347	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC800.09	hip1	sum2	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510059541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758069	2540219	2539136	276752	275708	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC1919.05	hip1	SPCC1919.05	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331364256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758070	2540219	2543128	276752	279560	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC3F10.06c	hip1	rit1	hir1	SPAC3F10.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503592218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758071	2540219	2543091	276752	279524	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC12G12.15	hip1	sif3	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.934618544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758072	2540219	2539772	276752	276323	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC1734.05c	hip1	spf31	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.407597245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758073	2540219	2540569	276752	277096	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC660.17c	hip1	SPBC660.17c	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143822432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758074	2540219	2542416	276752	278880	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC589.03c	hip1	SPAC589.03c	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035410174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758075	2540219	2540927	276752	277443	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC365.06	hip1	pmt3	hir1	smt3|ubl2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.992211191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758076	2540219	2539207	276752	275777	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC285.09c	hip1	cgs2	hir1	pde1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.031693593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758077	2540219	2543044	276752	279479	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC3C7.12	hip1	tip1	hir1	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.385199168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758078	2540219	2542309	276752	278775	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC16A10.02	hip1	sub1	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866675417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758079	2540219	2540333	276752	276863	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC21B10.07	hip1	SPBC21B10.07	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.226892014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758080	2540219	2538705	276752	275289	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC663.10	hip1	SPCC663.10	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.261545692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758081	2540219	2539375	276752	275941	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC4G3.11	hip1	mug154	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.978631658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758082	2540219	2543380	276752	279802	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC4G9.16c	hip1	rpl901	hir1	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842856381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758083	2540219	2538840	276752	275421	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC736.07c	hip1	SPCC736.07c	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.617182768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758084	2540219	2539189	276752	275760	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC1682.16	hip1	rpt4	hir1	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.620461915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758085	2540219	2539178	276752	275749	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC1682.14	hip1	rpl1902	hir1	rpl19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320807679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758086	2540219	2542702	276752	279155	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC8E11.01c	hip1	SPAC8E11.01c	hir1	SPAC959.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.183377477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758087	2540219	2539169	276752	275740	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC1235.11	hip1	mpc1	hir1	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454111798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758088	2540219	2538827	276752	275408	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC63.14	hip1	eis1	hir1	SPCC63.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.69991266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758089	2540219	2543387	276752	279809	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAPB1E7.02c	hip1	mcl1	hir1	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.573996962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758090	2540219	2543327	276752	279750	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC1D4.06c	hip1	csk1	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.62636515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758091	2540219	2540766	276752	277286	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC19C2.02	hip1	pmt1	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.97414002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758092	2540219	2542175	276752	278650	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC1F3.02c	hip1	mkh1	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.815170302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758093	2540219	2542424	276752	278886	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC1805.14	hip1	SPAC1805.14	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.619493683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758094	2540219	2541080	276752	277595	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC557.04	hip1	ppk29	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812142629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758095	2540219	2540383	276752	276912	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC31E1.02c	hip1	pmr1	hir1	cps5|pgak2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38127124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758096	2540219	2543472	276752	279892	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC959.04c	hip1	omh6	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.569374741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758097	2540219	2543646	276752	280060	SPBC31F10.13c	SPAC821.07c	hip1	moc3	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.263934678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758098	2540219	2540208	276752	276741	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC9B6.03	hip1	SPBC9B6.03	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.867895412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758099	2540219	2540787	276752	277306	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC1921.07c	hip1	sgf29	hir1	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.772948437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758100	2540219	2540798	276752	277317	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC19C7.01	hip1	mni1	hir1	SPBC32F12.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.476313494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758101	2540219	2539001	276752	275575	SPBC31F10.13c	SPCC1494.08c	hip1	SPCC1494.08c	hir1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.181357143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758102	2540219	2540736	276752	277259	SPBC31F10.13c	SPBC19F8.02	hip1	SPBC19F8.02	hir1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.801071007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758103	2542774	2541343	279223	277854	SPAC167.03c	SPBPB2B2.19c	snu66	SPBPB2B2.19c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.904453127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758104	2542774	2541552	279223	278051	SPAC167.03c	SPAC1142.08	snu66	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380979437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758105	2542774	3361561	279223	280637	SPAC167.03c	SPAC11E3.01c	snu66	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.69312352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758106	2542774	2540686	279223	277211	SPAC167.03c	SPBC21D10.10	snu66	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.613518078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758107	2542774	2539937	279223	276481	SPAC167.03c	SPBC1539.08	snu66	arf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.395560809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758108	2542774	2541998	279223	278482	SPAC167.03c	SPAC23A1.09	snu66	SPAC23A1.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989309367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758109	2542774	2543308	279223	279732	SPAC167.03c	SPAC694.04c	snu66	SPAC694.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.309924857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758110	2542774	2542220	279223	278694	SPAC167.03c	SPAC1A6.03c	snu66	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507120168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758111	2542774	2543426	279223	279846	SPAC167.03c	SPAC631.02	snu66	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.898535133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758112	2542774	2540825	279223	277343	SPAC167.03c	SPBC428.08c	snu66	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643665455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758113	2542774	2539051	279223	275624	SPAC167.03c	SPCC1183.11	snu66	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.478870792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758114	2542774	2539667	279223	276222	SPAC167.03c	SPBC13G1.08c	snu66	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.649280027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758115	2542774	2542861	279223	279307	SPAC167.03c	SPAC13G7.13c	snu66	msa1	-	SPAC6C3.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780581491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758116	2542774	2541464	279223	277966	SPAC167.03c	SPAC222.08c	snu66	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320370293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758117	2542774	2540599	279223	277125	SPAC167.03c	SPBC29A3.10c	snu66	atp14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815284257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758118	2542774	2541296	279223	277808	SPAC167.03c	SPBP8B7.06	snu66	rpp201	-	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568880092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758119	2542774	2539555	279223	276116	SPAC167.03c	SPCC4B3.08	snu66	lsg1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809824444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758120	2542774	2540800	279223	277319	SPAC167.03c	SPBC409.20c	snu66	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.056263324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758121	2542774	2542222	279223	278695	SPAC167.03c	SPAC31G5.18c	snu66	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.86285544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758122	2542774	2541806	279223	278297	SPAC167.03c	SPAC4G8.13c	snu66	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.569239418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758123	2542774	2542175	279223	278650	SPAC167.03c	SPAC1F3.02c	snu66	mkh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.587653589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758124	2542774	2539743	279223	276295	SPAC167.03c	SPBC16A3.08c	snu66	oga1	-	SPBC16A3.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640629707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758125	2542774	2543472	279223	279892	SPAC167.03c	SPAC959.04c	snu66	omh6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985423563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758126	2542774	2542094	279223	278571	SPAC167.03c	SPAC29B12.06c	snu66	rcd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.800683037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758127	2542774	2541062	279223	277577	SPAC167.03c	SPBC660.11	snu66	tcg1	-	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632300029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758128	2542774	2540787	279223	277306	SPAC167.03c	SPBC1921.07c	snu66	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.216400483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758129	2539773	2542577	276324	279033	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC19G12.15c	med7	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.881025419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758130	2539773	2542723	276324	279174	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC25H1.03	med7	atg101	-	mug66	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.838673308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758131	2539773	2539949	276324	276493	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC1703.04	med7	mlh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.126172749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758132	2539773	2540131	276324	276668	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC1778.05c	med7	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442014252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758133	2539773	2538896	276324	275474	SPBC14F5.08	SPCC584.11c	med7	SPCC584.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699252748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758134	2539773	3361561	276324	280637	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC11E3.01c	med7	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.950559186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758135	2539773	2539226	276324	275796	SPBC14F5.08	SPCC16C4.20c	med7	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094186737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758136	2539773	2540975	276324	277491	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC354.12	med7	gpd3	-	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.498422694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758137	2539773	2539564	276324	276125	SPBC14F5.08	SPCC550.12	med7	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.832372171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758138	2539773	2542689	276324	279142	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC29B12.04	med7	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.207521749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758139	2539773	2539249	276324	275819	SPBC14F5.08	SPCC1450.05c	med7	rox3	-	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324186735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758140	2539773	2539606	276324	276164	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC15D4.05	med7	SPBC15D4.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516030308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758141	2539773	2539988	276324	276532	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC1271.05c	med7	SPBC1271.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931057406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758142	2539773	2543426	276324	279846	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC631.02	med7	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.385696661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758143	2539773	2542373	276324	278837	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC1805.06c	med7	hem2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808728512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758144	2539773	2541885	276324	278375	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC22H10.03c	med7	kap114	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.772396642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758145	2539773	2543020	276324	279456	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC10F6.13c	med7	SPAC10F6.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.059462329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758146	2539773	2541801	276324	278292	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC2F7.08c	med7	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.677118033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758147	2539773	2543667	276324	280081	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC4H3.02c	med7	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.113296808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758148	2539773	2541899	276324	278389	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC22E12.11c	med7	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.847817708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758149	2539773	2541710	276324	278205	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC343.11c	med7	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.210617648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758150	2539773	2542126	276324	278602	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC1B3.05	med7	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.986096766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758151	2539773	2542710	276324	279163	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC750.08c	med7	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.743895059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758152	2539773	2541464	276324	277966	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC222.08c	med7	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.140890869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758153	2539773	2541283	276324	277796	SPBC14F5.08	SPBP8B7.02	med7	rng9	-	SPBP8B7.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582077313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758154	2539773	2539059	276324	275632	SPBC14F5.08	SPCC737.06c	med7	SPCC737.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.054689515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758155	2539773	2541337	276324	277848	SPBC14F5.08	SPBP35G2.13c	med7	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.973441724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758156	2539773	2540930	276324	277446	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC354.10	med7	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.941248235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758157	2539773	2542170	276324	278645	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC17G8.13c	med7	mst2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.060361099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758158	2539773	2539748	276324	276300	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC11C11.01	med7	SPBC11C11.01	-	SPBC17D1.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579280246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758159	2539773	2540619	276324	277145	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC25H2.15	med7	SPBC25H2.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844687913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758160	2539773	2540800	276324	277319	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC409.20c	med7	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049487429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758161	2539773	2540115	276324	276652	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC1778.02	med7	rap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440355031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758162	2539773	2540699	276324	277223	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC800.08	med7	gcd10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703675874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758163	2539773	2541797	276324	278288	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC22F3.04	med7	mug62	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.412011676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758164	2539773	2542826	276324	279273	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC13G6.09	med7	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.440719613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758165	2539773	2539668	276324	276223	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC11B10.10c	med7	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.884503824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758166	2539773	2539178	276324	275749	SPBC14F5.08	SPCC1682.14	med7	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.559559291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758167	2539773	2543337	276324	279760	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC959.08	med7	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448489568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758168	2539773	2542943	276324	279384	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC1348.03	med7	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.914229396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758169	2541212	2542677	277726	279130	SPBC887.05c	SPAC26F1.10c	cwf29	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.707888812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758170	2541212	2540967	277726	277483	SPBC887.05c	SPBC36B7.08c	cwf29	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.717351468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758171	2541212	2540599	277726	277125	SPBC887.05c	SPBC29A3.10c	cwf29	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.383422577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758172	2543044	2541512	279479	278013	SPAC3C7.12	SPAC11E3.08c	tip1	nse6	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515343867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758173	2543044	2541818	279479	278309	SPAC3C7.12	SPAC11G7.02	tip1	pub1	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.040660466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758174	2543044	2543064	279479	279497	SPAC3C7.12	SPAC3G6.01	tip1	hrp3	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.401557397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758175	2543044	2540161	279479	276696	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC13E7.03c	tip1	SPBC13E7.03c	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.232642287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758176	2543044	2543434	279479	279854	SPAC3C7.12	SPAC8F11.02c	tip1	dph3	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.502410276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758177	2543044	2540686	279479	277211	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC21D10.10	tip1	bdc1	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.741987448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758178	2543044	2542103	279479	278579	SPAC3C7.12	SPAC31G5.11	tip1	pac2	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.438391627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758179	2543044	2540491	279479	277019	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC28E12.04	tip1	SPBC28E12.04	noc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03572076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758180	2543044	2540979	279479	277495	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC3H7.10	tip1	elp6	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.063554323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758181	2543044	2539434	279479	275997	SPAC3C7.12	SPCC757.09c	tip1	rnc1	noc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.939340387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758182	2543044	2540929	279479	277445	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC354.03	tip1	swd3	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.58296294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758183	2543044	2542318	279479	278784	SPAC3C7.12	SPAC16C9.05	tip1	cph1	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.590563876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758184	2543044	2542969	279479	279409	SPAC3C7.12	SPAC4G8.10	tip1	gos1	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992409907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758185	2543044	2539244	279479	275814	SPAC3C7.12	SPCC1672.06c	tip1	asp1	noc1	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.86873986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758186	2543044	2538906	279479	275483	SPAC3C7.12	SPCC1259.03	tip1	rpa12	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.206287023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758187	2543044	2541021	279479	277536	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC3B8.10c	tip1	nem1	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.83678456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758188	2543044	2539023	279479	275596	SPAC3C7.12	SPCC594.05c	tip1	spf1	noc1	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.469362546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758189	2543044	2539467	279479	276030	SPAC3C7.12	SPCC417.07c	tip1	mto1	noc1	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.379895598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758190	2543044	2541250	279479	277764	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC8D2.17	tip1	gmh4	noc1	SPBC8D2.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143091787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758191	2543044	2540150	279479	276687	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC16E9.14c	tip1	zrg17	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390911082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758192	2543044	2539999	279479	276543	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC1734.15	tip1	rsc4	noc1	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.859008721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758193	2543044	2539857	279479	276404	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC1604.20c	tip1	tea2	noc1	klp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.20514558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758194	2543044	2538769	279479	275352	SPAC3C7.12	SPCC126.04c	tip1	sgf73	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.907665283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758195	2543044	2539667	279479	276222	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC13G1.08c	tip1	ash2	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.666434275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758196	2543044	2541900	279479	278390	SPAC3C7.12	SPAC23H4.17c	tip1	srb10	noc1	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.175012364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758197	2543044	2540990	279479	277506	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC36B7.06c	tip1	mug20	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.064085527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758198	2543044	2539847	279479	276395	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC530.14c	tip1	dsk1	noc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.072733031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758199	2543044	2543011	279479	279449	SPAC3C7.12	SPAC10F6.11c	tip1	atg17	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.305874265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758200	2543044	2539763	279479	276314	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC1861.05	tip1	SPBC1861.05	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388922963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758201	2543044	2538762	279479	275345	SPAC3C7.12	SPCC306.04c	tip1	set1	noc1	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.911384645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758202	2543044	2539555	279479	276116	SPAC3C7.12	SPCC4B3.08	tip1	lsg1	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390572172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758203	2543044	2540498	279479	277026	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC27.02c	tip1	ask1	noc1	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.451240641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758204	2543044	2540346	279479	276875	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC2F12.03c	tip1	ebs1	noc1	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.765891733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758205	2543044	2540829	279479	277347	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC800.09	tip1	sum2	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.609609545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758206	2543044	2542418	279479	278881	SPAC3C7.12	SPAC1805.07c	tip1	dad2	noc1	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.061176397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758207	2543044	2539205	279479	275775	SPAC3C7.12	SPCC4B3.15	tip1	mid1	noc1	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.99160667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758208	2543044	2540146	279479	276683	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC17A3.06	tip1	SPBC17A3.06	noc1	pi040	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.351260761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758209	2543044	2538840	279479	275421	SPAC3C7.12	SPCC736.07c	tip1	SPCC736.07c	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642973488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758210	2543044	2543384	279479	279806	SPAC3C7.12	SPAC637.06	tip1	gmh5	noc1	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.268523444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758211	2543044	2540309	279479	276839	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC21B10.13c	tip1	yox1	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.042494638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758212	2543044	2541062	279479	277577	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC660.11	tip1	tcg1	noc1	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.136164583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758213	2543044	2540320	279479	276850	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC3D6.04c	tip1	mad1	noc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.619098581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758214	2539651	2539050	276206	275623	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC11E10.08	srb11	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509091352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758215	2539651	2538961	276206	275535	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC285.14	srb11	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701034141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758216	2539651	2542598	276206	279052	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC6G10.08	srb11	idp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.762659174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758217	2539651	2542518	276206	278976	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC1B3.16c	srb11	vht1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196850698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758218	2539651	2540913	276206	277429	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC56F2.08c	srb11	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.186125758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758219	2539651	2539749	276206	276301	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC16A3.13	srb11	meu7	-	aah4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933073314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758220	2539651	2539582	276206	276141	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC594.07c	srb11	bqt3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568307232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758221	2539651	2543339	276206	279762	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC630.13c	srb11	tsc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.574764858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758222	2539651	2543578	276206	279993	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC9.10	srb11	thi9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048192597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758223	2539651	2540433	276206	276961	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC2D10.06	srb11	rep1	-	rec16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.508564993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758224	2539651	2543356	276206	279778	SPBC12D12.06	SPAPB2C8.01	srb11	SPAPB2C8.01	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.99174997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758225	2539651	2541117	276206	277632	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC646.13	srb11	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.45617122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758226	2539651	2542098	276206	278574	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC30D11.01c	srb11	gto2	-	SPAC30D11.01c|SPAC56F8.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924166636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758227	2539651	2542502	276206	278960	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC139.06	srb11	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3835998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758228	2539651	2539196	276206	275767	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC1795.03	srb11	gms1	-	gmn3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042292485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758229	2539651	2541066	276206	277581	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC543.02c	srb11	SPBC543.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807849429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758230	2539651	2539201	276206	275772	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC188.09c	srb11	pfl4	-	SPCC188.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.564367118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758231	2539651	2543103	276206	279535	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC3F10.09	srb11	SPAC3F10.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.225081885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758232	2539651	2539332	276206	275898	SPBC12D12.06	SPCPB1C11.01	srb11	amt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986654206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758233	2539651	2539443	276206	276006	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC736.02	srb11	SPCC736.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818899965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758234	2539651	2542273	276206	278742	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC17H9.13c	srb11	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.28816761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758235	2539651	2542816	276206	279263	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC4G8.11c	srb11	atp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323943762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758236	2539651	2540919	276206	277435	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC543.07	srb11	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.330019505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758237	2539651	2539472	276206	276035	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC794.03	srb11	SPCC794.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.20095584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758238	2539651	2539331	276206	275897	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC24B10.09	srb11	rps1702	-	rps17|rps17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380633839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758239	2539651	2543048	276206	279483	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC3F10.02c	srb11	trk1	-	sptrk	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.14388738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758240	2539651	2542012	276206	278495	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC23C11.02c	srb11	rps23	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.117898123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758241	2539651	2540023	276206	276567	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC11C11.10	srb11	SPBC11C11.10	-	SPBC3B8.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.993874822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758242	2539651	2540825	276206	277343	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC428.08c	srb11	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441930461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758243	2539651	2541021	276206	277536	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC3B8.10c	srb11	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.924142526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758244	2539651	2540893	276206	277409	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC543.10	srb11	get1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.628232429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758245	2539651	2539310	276206	275877	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC285.17	srb11	spp27	-	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508829505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758246	2539651	2542568	276206	279024	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC1952.02	srb11	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452823647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758247	2539651	2543573	276206	279988	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC869.11	srb11	cat1	-	SPAC922.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145642282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758248	2539651	2541885	276206	278375	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC22H10.03c	srb11	kap114	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813436943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758249	2539651	2541741	276206	278235	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC20G4.02c	srb11	fus1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101568514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758250	2539651	2542177	276206	278652	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC17H9.08	srb11	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.93189298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758251	2539651	2542596	276206	279050	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC1B3.17	srb11	clr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708860254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758252	2539651	2541801	276206	278292	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC2F7.08c	srb11	snf5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811271727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758253	2539651	2538715	276206	275299	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC1223.05c	srb11	rpl3702	-	rpl37|rpl37-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913336842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758254	2539651	2543593	276206	280008	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC4G9.10	srb11	arg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381886844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758255	2539651	2542463	276206	278924	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC1834.03c	srb11	hhf1	-	h4.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.191994766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758256	2539651	2542776	276206	279225	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC167.01	srb11	ire1	-	ppk4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196611138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758257	2539651	2542971	276206	279410	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC105.02c	srb11	SPAC105.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037018273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758258	2539651	2542873	276206	279318	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC9G1.02	srb11	wis4	-	wak1|wik1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57755055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758259	2539651	2538994	276206	275568	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC553.01c	srb11	dbl2	-	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.907554516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758260	2539651	2541710	276206	278205	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC343.11c	srb11	msc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874866975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758261	2539651	2540538	276206	277065	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC26H8.03	srb11	cho2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818600955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758262	2539651	2538873	276206	275452	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC306.11	srb11	SPCC306.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.92199959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758263	2539651	2540751	276206	277273	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC20F10.10	srb11	psl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.58201993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758264	2539651	2542214	276206	278688	SPBC12D12.06	SPACUNK4.11c	srb11	mpp6	-	SPACUNK4.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.43727722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758265	2539651	2543080	276206	279513	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC3A11.10c	srb11	SPAC3A11.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.518196152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758266	2539651	2542439	276206	278901	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC17A5.08	srb11	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.339666596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758267	2539651	2541053	276206	277568	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC56F2.10c	srb11	alg5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.314231508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758268	2539651	2542060	276206	278538	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC23C11.14	srb11	zhf1	-	zhf	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575154517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758269	2539651	2541927	276206	278415	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC222.12c	srb11	atp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.56538562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758270	2539651	2541488	276206	277990	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC227.17c	srb11	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851174385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758271	2539651	2543009	276206	279447	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC10F6.06	srb11	vip1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.921830539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758272	2539651	2538848	276206	275429	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC613.12c	srb11	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.264596381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758273	2539651	2540918	276206	277434	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC800.02	srb11	whi5	-	mug54	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04741474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758274	2539651	2539763	276206	276314	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC1861.05	srb11	SPBC1861.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.611475876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758275	2539651	2540910	276206	277426	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC577.02	srb11	rpl3801	-	rpl38-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.745286983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758276	2539651	2539490	276206	276053	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC364.07	srb11	ser3	-	SPCC364.07|SPCC4G3.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922747177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758277	2539651	2541175	276206	277689	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC839.13c	srb11	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.502432679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758278	2539651	2540960	276206	277476	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC3D6.02	srb11	but2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386860242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758279	2539651	2540600	276206	277126	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC4.05	srb11	mlo2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095681719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758280	2539651	2543130	276206	279562	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC869.05c	srb11	SPAC869.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979649296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758281	2539651	2543662	276206	280076	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC9.07c	srb11	SPAC9.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09767277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758282	2539651	2542955	276206	279395	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC11E3.12	srb11	SPAC11E3.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.33002793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758283	2539651	2541114	276206	277629	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC582.09	srb11	pex11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2727761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758284	2539651	2542731	276206	279181	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC5H10.09c	srb11	SPAC5H10.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.31959722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758285	2539651	2543329	276206	279752	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC56F8.02	srb11	SPAC56F8.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.00348395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758286	2539651	2538916	276206	275493	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC16C4.17	srb11	mug123	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.312748495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758287	2539651	2539729	276206	276281	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC11B10.07c	srb11	ivn1	-	pi004|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92389113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758288	2539651	2539514	276206	276076	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC663.14c	srb11	trp663	-	SPCC663.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575167751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758289	2539651	2539335	276206	275901	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC1450.16c	srb11	ptl1	-	SPCC1450.16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647581767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758290	2539651	2543228	276206	279656	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC6B12.04c	srb11	SPAC6B12.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.456056609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758291	2539651	2543602	276206	280017	SPBC12D12.06	SPAPB1A11.04c	srb11	mca1	-	SPAPB1A11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.122641747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758292	2539651	2538694	276206	275279	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC191.09c	srb11	gst1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982315448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758293	2539651	2542838	276206	279284	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC13G7.11	srb11	SPAC13G7.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037716624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758294	2539651	2542509	276206	278967	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC3A11.09	srb11	sod22	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808837541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758295	2539651	2540146	276206	276683	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC17A3.06	srb11	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63429817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758296	2539651	2543337	276206	279760	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC959.08	srb11	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.558099756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758297	2539651	2542059	276206	278537	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC328.06	srb11	ubp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820587487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758298	2539651	2539169	276206	275740	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC1235.11	srb11	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045198045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758299	2539651	2541129	276206	277644	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC713.11c	srb11	pmp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145041024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758300	2539651	2541778	276206	278271	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC23G3.05c	srb11	SPAC23G3.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809474664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758301	2539651	2543070	276206	279503	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC2H10.02c	srb11	SPAC2H10.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873216039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758302	2539651	2539588	276206	276146	SPBC12D12.06	SPCC962.04	srb11	rps1201	-	rps12|rps12-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512700023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758303	2539651	2540309	276206	276839	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC21B10.13c	srb11	yox1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.999838191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758304	2539651	2540320	276206	276850	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC3D6.04c	srb11	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640091707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758305	2539651	2540649	276206	277174	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC19F8.08	srb11	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.06493828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758306	2541953	2541801	278440	278292	SPAP27G11.07c	SPAC2F7.08c	bud32	snf5	SPAP27G11.07c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.141453823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758307	2541953	2540150	278440	276687	SPAP27G11.07c	SPBC16E9.14c	bud32	zrg17	SPAP27G11.07c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979775951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758308	2541953	2542007	278440	278490	SPAP27G11.07c	SPAC20H4.07	bud32	rad57	SPAP27G11.07c	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.33134313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758309	2541953	2540318	278440	276848	SPAP27G11.07c	SPBC30B4.04c	bud32	sol1	SPAP27G11.07c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.938982422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758310	2541473	2542895	277975	279339	SPAC2C4.14c	SPAC13G6.10c	ppk11	asl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812871549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758311	2541473	2539201	277975	275772	SPAC2C4.14c	SPCC188.09c	ppk11	pfl4	-	SPCC188.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818106994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758312	2541473	2540993	277975	277509	SPAC2C4.14c	SPBC342.01c	ppk11	alg6	-	SPBC3F6.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041595376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758313	2541473	2540425	277975	276953	SPAC2C4.14c	SPBC27.06c	ppk11	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44070455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758314	2541473	2541021	277975	277536	SPAC2C4.14c	SPBC3B8.10c	ppk11	nem1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196524451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758315	2541473	2540906	277975	277422	SPAC2C4.14c	SPBC365.20c	ppk11	pnc1	-	SPBC557.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.402655196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758316	2541473	2541250	277975	277764	SPAC2C4.14c	SPBC8D2.17	ppk11	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091820467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758317	2541473	2542549	277975	279006	SPAC2C4.14c	SPAC19A8.11c	ppk11	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932863529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758318	2541473	2540533	277975	277061	SPAC2C4.14c	SPBC29A10.16c	ppk11	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.705634569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758319	2541473	2541488	277975	277990	SPAC2C4.14c	SPAC227.17c	ppk11	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.82526127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758320	2541473	2541628	277975	278124	SPAC2C4.14c	SPAC110.02	ppk11	pds5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.401073826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758321	2541473	3361389	277975	280465	SPAC2C4.14c	SPAC977.13c	ppk11	SPAC977.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.19321155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758322	2541473	2541806	277975	278297	SPAC2C4.14c	SPAC4G8.13c	ppk11	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.978761266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758323	2541900	2539050	278390	275623	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC11E10.08	srb10	rik1	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.924334486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758324	2541900	2538796	278390	275377	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC63.06	srb10	SPCC63.06	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462175688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758325	2541900	2539405	278390	275970	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC553.03	srb10	pex1	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.150607627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758326	2541900	2540885	278390	277402	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC660.14	srb10	mik1	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.665089634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758327	2541900	2542585	278390	279040	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC31A2.13c	srb10	sft1	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.511618116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758328	2541900	2540833	278390	277351	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC18H10.20c	srb10	any1	cdk8|prk1	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.202992559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758329	2541900	2539949	278390	276493	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC1703.04	srb10	mlh1	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.885621207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758330	2541900	2541512	278390	278013	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC11E3.08c	srb10	nse6	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.821523318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758331	2541900	2540913	278390	277429	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC56F2.08c	srb10	SPBC56F2.08c	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.546222487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758332	2541900	2539492	278390	276055	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCPB16A4.06c	srb10	SPCPB16A4.06c	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384578892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758333	2541900	2542066	278390	278543	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC227.05	srb10	SPAC227.05	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.157325433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758334	2541900	2541570	278390	278067	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC6G9.09c	srb10	rpl2401	cdk8|prk1	rpl24|rpl24-01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.333666243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758335	2541900	2540131	278390	276668	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC1778.05c	srb10	SPBC1778.05c	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928635352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758336	2541900	2540901	278390	277417	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC4F6.16c	srb10	ero11	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.459201464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758337	2541900	2542197	278390	278672	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC1142.01	srb10	rqc1	cdk8|prk1	SPAC1142.01|SPAC17G6.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776855897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758338	2541900	2542928	278390	279369	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC1142.06	srb10	get3	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.10968149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758339	2541900	2543592	278390	280007	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC4F10.18	srb10	nup37	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.40161654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758340	2541900	2541167	278390	277682	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC691.05c	srb10	SPBC691.05c	cdk8|prk1	pi030|SPACTOKYO_453.04|SPBP22H7.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.267548219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758341	2541900	2539930	278390	276474	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC1198.11c	srb10	reb1	cdk8|prk1	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.895070588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758342	2541900	3361561	278390	280637	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC11E3.01c	srb10	swr1	cdk8|prk1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.156293897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758343	2541900	2541130	278390	277645	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC776.11	srb10	rpl2801	cdk8|prk1	rpl28-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643935269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758344	2541900	2540161	278390	276696	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC13E7.03c	srb10	SPBC13E7.03c	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988906744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758345	2541900	2542747	278390	279197	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC15A10.06	srb10	SPAC15A10.06	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094224624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758346	2541900	5802967	278390	858105	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC20G4.08	srb10	pdc1	cdk8|prk1	SPAC20G4.08|SPAC4F10.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815835863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758347	2541900	2540474	278390	277002	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC26H8.09c	srb10	snf59	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.458606825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758348	2541900	2543479	278390	279899	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC688.04c	srb10	gst3	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700987521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758349	2541900	2541497	278390	277999	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC7D4.13c	srb10	SPAC7D4.13c	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329753298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758350	2541900	2541374	278390	277885	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBPB10D8.06c	srb10	SPBPB10D8.06c	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504944182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758351	2541900	5802945	278390	858083	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC19G12.16c	srb10	adg2	cdk8|prk1	SPAC23A1.01c|mug46	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392258849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758352	2541900	2539201	278390	275772	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC188.09c	srb10	pfl4	cdk8|prk1	SPCC188.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.509134199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758353	2541900	2538922	278390	275499	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC16C4.10	srb10	SPCC16C4.10	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.303404445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758354	2541900	2541584	278390	278081	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAP32A8.02	srb10	SPAP32A8.02	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09887342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758355	2541900	2540579	278390	277105	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC28E12.02	srb10	SPBC28E12.02	cdk8|prk1	SPBC9B6.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.566842985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758356	2541900	2540535	278390	277062	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC215.01	srb10	SPBC215.01	cdk8|prk1	SPBC3B9.20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.843492826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758357	2541900	2540664	278390	277189	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC215.02	srb10	bob1	cdk8|prk1	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.231045752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758358	2541900	2543320	278390	279744	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAPJ695.01c	srb10	SPAPJ695.01c	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934861285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758359	2541900	2540999	278390	277515	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC4B4.04	srb10	SPBC4B4.04	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.080296692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758360	2541900	2541235	278390	277749	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC8D2.12c	srb10	SPBC8D2.12c	cdk8|prk1	pI053	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874350291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758361	2541900	2539226	278390	275796	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC16C4.20c	srb10	SPCC16C4.20c	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.764359318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758362	2541900	2543658	278390	280072	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC644.09	srb10	SPAC644.09	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.800755226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758363	2541900	2539420	278390	275985	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC970.07c	srb10	raf2	cdk8|prk1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.424056713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758364	2541900	2540979	278390	277495	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC3H7.10	srb10	elp6	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932735222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758365	2541900	2538847	278390	275428	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC594.06c	srb10	SPCC594.06c	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.20251956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758366	2541900	2539510	278390	276072	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC4G3.04c	srb10	coq5	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922949756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758367	2541900	2541058	278390	277573	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC3H7.09	srb10	erf2	cdk8|prk1	mug142	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877611396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758368	2541900	2539564	278390	276125	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC550.12	srb10	arp6	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.409333487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758369	2541900	2539235	278390	275805	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC1682.15	srb10	mug122	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44143246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758370	2541900	2542689	278390	279142	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC29B12.04	srb10	snz1	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819590531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758371	2541900	2540945	278390	277461	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC342.06c	srb10	rtt109	cdk8|prk1	kat11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.502016003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758372	2541900	2540306	278390	276836	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC2G5.02c	srb10	ckb2	cdk8|prk1	SPBC2G5.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707211934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758373	2541900	2539434	278390	275997	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC757.09c	srb10	rnc1	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1637115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758374	2541900	2543111	278390	279543	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC806.07	srb10	ndk1	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711033855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758375	2541900	2542555	278390	279012	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC1952.06c	srb10	SPAC1952.06c	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.538215202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758376	2541900	2540220	278390	276753	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC337.03	srb10	rhn1	cdk8|prk1	SPBC337.03|iss4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.353610601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758377	2541900	2540095	278390	276633	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC115.03	srb10	SPBC115.03	cdk8|prk1	SPBC839.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321576437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758378	2541900	2541558	278390	278057	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC1F7.08	srb10	fio1	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.50701393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758379	2541900	2542182	278390	278657	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC19B12.08	srb10	atg4	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.665970424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758380	2541900	2541346	278390	277857	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBP8B7.08c	srb10	ppm1	cdk8|prk1	SPBP8B7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851877748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758381	2541900	2542165	278390	278641	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC1782.08c	srb10	rex3	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.878164121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758382	2541900	2541323	278390	277835	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBP35G2.14	srb10	SPBP35G2.14	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930419994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758383	2541900	2542220	278390	278694	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC1A6.03c	srb10	SPAC1A6.03c	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.861267961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758384	2541900	2539822	278390	276372	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC16G5.02c	srb10	SPBC16G5.02c	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.27436637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758385	2541900	2539244	278390	275814	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC1672.06c	srb10	asp1	cdk8|prk1	vip1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043715275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758386	2541900	2540059	278390	276597	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC1198.01	srb10	fmd2	cdk8|prk1	SPBC1198.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872206549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758387	2541900	2539820	278390	276370	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC1709.13c	srb10	set10	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.399732402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758388	2541900	2541522	278390	278023	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC23E2.01	srb10	fep1	cdk8|prk1	gaf2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.872923378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758389	2541900	2541004	278390	277519	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC3F6.01c	srb10	SPBC3F6.01c	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.851150525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758390	2541900	2543292	278390	279717	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC6C3.02c	srb10	SPAC6C3.02c	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775332055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758391	2541900	2539352	278390	275918	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC188.07	srb10	ccq1	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.888493176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758392	2541900	2539100	278390	275672	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC330.12c	srb10	sdh3	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.25077198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758393	2541900	2539381	278390	275947	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC1739.10	srb10	mug33	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983516125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758394	2541900	2539092	278390	275664	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC1259.08	srb10	SPCC1259.08	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868321784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758395	2541900	2540359	278390	276888	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC30D10.14	srb10	SPBC30D10.14	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570979593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758396	2541900	2541021	278390	277536	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC3B8.10c	srb10	nem1	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980570293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758397	2541900	2539023	278390	275596	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC594.05c	srb10	spf1	cdk8|prk1	spp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.347948422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758398	2541900	2541544	278390	278044	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC22G7.06c	srb10	ura1	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189143126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758399	2541900	2539098	278390	275670	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC24B10.18	srb10	SPCC24B10.18	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.598852474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758400	2541900	2541938	278390	278425	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC8C9.16c	srb10	mug63	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.876790331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758401	2541900	2540834	278390	277352	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC18H10.18c	srb10	SPBC18H10.18c	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.333214087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758402	2541900	2543537	278390	279954	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC4D7.05	srb10	sum1	cdk8|prk1	tif34	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.512404972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758403	2541900	2541885	278390	278375	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC22H10.03c	srb10	kap114	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.874921612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758404	2541900	2541664	278390	278160	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC2H10.01	srb10	SPAC2H10.01	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.076992825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758405	2541900	2541741	278390	278235	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC20G4.02c	srb10	fus1	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.805601239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758406	2541900	2540797	278390	277316	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC18H10.11c	srb10	ppr2	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.266745936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758407	2541900	2540631	278390	277157	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC25B2.10	srb10	SPBC25B2.10	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.348140675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758408	2541900	2538715	278390	275299	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC1223.05c	srb10	rpl3702	cdk8|prk1	rpl37|rpl37-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196031764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758409	2541900	2541250	278390	277764	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC8D2.17	srb10	gmh4	cdk8|prk1	SPBC8D2.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.511272742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758410	2541900	2541776	278390	278270	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC23H3.05c	srb10	swd1	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.193395591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758411	2541900	2539845	278390	276393	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC12C2.02c	srb10	ste20	cdk8|prk1	ste16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.703148995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758412	2541900	2543445	278390	279865	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC4F10.13c	srb10	mpd2	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866960317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758413	2541900	2542463	278390	278924	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC1834.03c	srb10	hhf1	cdk8|prk1	h4.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.553259086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758414	2541900	2541160	278390	277675	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC725.09c	srb10	hob3	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148553631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758415	2541900	2540348	278390	276877	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC29A10.05	srb10	exo1	cdk8|prk1	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.39879439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758416	2541900	2542507	278390	278965	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC18G6.13	srb10	SPAC18G6.13	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145180766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758417	2541900	2540352	278390	276881	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC215.03c	srb10	csn1	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.124451017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758418	2541900	2543412	278390	279834	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC637.07	srb10	moe1	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.772335809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758419	2541900	2539733	278390	276285	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC16E9.12c	srb10	pab2	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.758147214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758420	2541900	2539046	278390	275619	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC1223.12c	srb10	meu10	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.845815523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758421	2541900	2541889	278390	278379	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC2F7.03c	srb10	pom1	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.609932487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758422	2541900	2539371	278390	275937	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC18B5.06	srb10	dom34	cdk8|prk1	SPCC18B5.06|erf1|sup45	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637933853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758423	2541900	2539454	278390	276017	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC622.15c	srb10	SPCC622.15c	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039500593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758424	2541900	2542522	278390	278980	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC19A8.03	srb10	ymr1	cdk8|prk1	SPAC19A8.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642530084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758425	2541900	2543313	278390	279737	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAPJ691.03	srb10	SPAPJ691.03	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317821832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758426	2541900	2541388	278390	277899	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBP8B7.30c	srb10	thi5	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.410819828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758427	2541900	2541183	278390	277697	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC725.14	srb10	arg6	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.970848076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758428	2541900	2539689	278390	276244	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC1861.03	srb10	mak10	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814037149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758429	2541900	2542357	278390	278822	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC1782.07	srb10	qcr8	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.850588193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758430	2541900	2541899	278390	278389	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC22E12.11c	srb10	set3	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.083895223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758431	2541900	2540086	278390	276624	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC16H5.12c	srb10	SPBC16H5.12c	cdk8|prk1	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.617191505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758432	2541900	2542902	278390	279346	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC144.05	srb10	SPAC144.05	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.608856791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758433	2541900	2543396	278390	279818	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC4D7.11	srb10	dsc4	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.83679701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758434	2541900	2538808	278390	275389	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCPB16A4.05c	srb10	SPCPB16A4.05c	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51272693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758435	2541900	2540538	278390	277065	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC26H8.03	srb10	cho2	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871534977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758436	2541900	2540350	278390	276879	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC317.01	srb10	mbx2	cdk8|prk1	pvg4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.443459714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758437	2541900	2539667	278390	276222	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC13G1.08c	srb10	ash2	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.465244479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758438	2541900	2542032	278390	278514	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC23C11.04c	srb10	pnk1	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567384719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758439	2541900	2540194	278390	276727	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC1709.09	srb10	rrf1	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988242754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758440	2541900	2540997	278390	277513	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC3H7.06c	srb10	pof9	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.22270744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758441	2541900	2540751	278390	277273	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC20F10.10	srb10	psl1	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633429851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758442	2541900	2540371	278390	276900	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC36.11	srb10	SPBC36.11	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844045727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758443	2541900	2539974	278390	276518	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC32H8.07	srb10	git5	cdk8|prk1	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.512393151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758444	2541900	2541720	278390	278214	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC23H3.13c	srb10	gpa2	cdk8|prk1	git8	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.67127181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758445	2541900	2540836	278390	277354	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC18H10.19	srb10	vps38	cdk8|prk1	atg14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758446	2541900	2538935	278390	275511	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC1682.11c	srb10	ctl1	cdk8|prk1	SPCC1682.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382857943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758447	2541900	2542254	278390	278724	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC30D11.04c	srb10	nup124	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813572611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758448	2541900	2542612	278390	279066	SPAC23H4.17c	SPACUNK4.15	srb10	SPACUNK4.15	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.918265115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758449	2541900	2540327	278390	276857	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC31F10.07	srb10	lsb5	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.503559392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758450	2541900	2543311	278390	279735	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC977.15	srb10	SPAC977.15	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.498130272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758451	2541900	2540318	278390	276848	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC30B4.04c	srb10	sol1	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.642444615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758452	2541900	2539408	278390	275973	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC576.12c	srb10	mhf2	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455681426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758453	2541900	2542519	278390	278977	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC19G12.08	srb10	scs7	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193449853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758454	2541900	2539215	278390	275785	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC285.16c	srb10	msh6	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194658456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758455	2541900	5802861	278390	857999	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC1D4.01	srb10	tls1	cdk8|prk1	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64722003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758456	2541900	2538949	278390	275523	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC320.03	srb10	SPCC320.03	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037696138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758457	2541900	2540990	278390	277506	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC36B7.06c	srb10	mug20	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.074646599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758458	2541900	2541389	278390	277900	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBPB2B2.09c	srb10	SPBPB2B2.09c	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194129736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758459	2541900	2540201	278390	276734	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC13A2.04c	srb10	ptr2	cdk8|prk1	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.80410189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758460	2541900	2541464	278390	277966	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC222.08c	srb10	SPAC222.08c	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101741245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758461	2541900	2542960	278390	279400	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC1039.04	srb10	SPAC1039.04	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.125682437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758462	2541900	2540184	278390	276717	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC106.12c	srb10	SPBC106.12c	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871102884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758463	2541900	2541283	278390	277796	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBP8B7.02	srb10	rng9	cdk8|prk1	SPBP8B7.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.56593124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758464	2541900	2540882	278390	277399	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC4F6.08c	srb10	mrpl39	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.518170846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758465	2541900	2542550	278390	279007	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC1B3.02c	srb10	SPAC1B3.02c	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.655956041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758466	2541900	2539993	278390	276537	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC1105.05	srb10	exg1	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194226764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758467	2541900	2540193	278390	276726	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC1289.10c	srb10	adn2	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.763238908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758468	2541900	2540005	278390	276549	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC1347.09	srb10	SPBC1347.09	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.564004958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758469	2541900	2541337	278390	277848	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBP35G2.13c	srb10	swc2	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.349803779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758470	2541900	2541378	278390	277889	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBP8B7.21	srb10	ubp3	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.971166823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758471	2541900	2541963	278390	278449	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC21E11.04	srb10	aca1	cdk8|prk1	ppr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.514852912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758472	2541900	2540918	278390	277434	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC800.02	srb10	whi5	cdk8|prk1	mug54	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934303364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758473	2541900	2539932	278390	276476	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC13E7.07	srb10	SPBC13E7.07	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924831616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758474	2541900	2539631	278390	276187	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC16G5.16	srb10	SPBC16G5.16	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.557680299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758475	2541900	2543113	278390	279545	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC3F10.07c	srb10	erf4	cdk8|prk1	mug91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.151129096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758476	2541900	2539686	278390	276241	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC1734.06	srb10	rhp18	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196020158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758477	2541900	2541798	278390	278289	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC22F3.03c	srb10	rdh54	cdk8|prk1	mug34|tid1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.656298414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758478	2541900	2539453	278390	276016	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCPB1C11.03	srb10	SPCPB1C11.03	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.717448604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758479	2541900	2539748	278390	276300	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC11C11.01	srb10	SPBC11C11.01	cdk8|prk1	SPBC17D1.08	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045929755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758480	2541900	2538762	278390	275345	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC306.04c	srb10	set1	cdk8|prk1	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.695151133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758481	2541900	2543071	278390	279504	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC3C7.06c	srb10	pit1	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.552612897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758482	2541900	2541175	278390	277689	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC839.13c	srb10	rpl1601	cdk8|prk1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515300627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758483	2541900	2539896	278390	276442	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC146.02	srb10	SPBC146.02	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319936316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758484	2541900	2542883	278390	279328	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC1486.04c	srb10	alm1	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143722968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758485	2541900	2542881	278390	279326	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC13F5.03c	srb10	gld1	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.316530443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758486	2541900	2539600	278390	276158	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCP1E11.03	srb10	mug170	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.699847686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758487	2541900	2543304	278390	279728	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC6B12.12	srb10	tom70	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.298125673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758488	2541900	2540531	278390	277059	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC23E6.08	srb10	sat1	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812096076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758489	2541900	2538962	278390	275536	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC965.13	srb10	SPCC965.13	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258832055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758490	2541900	2541279	278390	277792	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC8E4.03	srb10	SPBC8E4.03	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.057118675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758491	2541900	2538714	278390	275298	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC330.11	srb10	btb1	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321572286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758492	2541900	2541100	278390	277615	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC651.04	srb10	SPBC651.04	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.310548339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758493	2541900	2541432	278390	277937	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC1F5.05c	srb10	mso1	cdk8|prk1	SPAC1F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048955949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758494	2541900	2540977	278390	277493	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC3E7.02c	srb10	hsp16	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.615736515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758495	2541900	2541425	278390	277930	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC2C4.17c	srb10	msy2	cdk8|prk1	SPAC2C4.17c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.10359949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758496	2541900	2540725	278390	277248	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC215.14c	srb10	vps20	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042869225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758497	2541900	2541367	278390	277878	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBP8B7.13	srb10	vac7	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.564681499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758498	2541900	2541531	278390	278031	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC25A8.01c	srb10	fft3	cdk8|prk1	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.400217281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758499	2541900	2541470	278390	277972	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAPYUG7.04c	srb10	rpb9	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.155329871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758500	2541900	2540829	278390	277347	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC800.09	srb10	sum2	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.122057537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758501	2541900	2542418	278390	278881	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC1805.07c	srb10	dad2	cdk8|prk1	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.312312666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758502	2541900	2538692	278390	275277	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC162.04c	srb10	wtf13	cdk8|prk1	wtf12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.456037079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758503	2541900	2541229	278390	277743	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC839.05c	srb10	rps1701	cdk8|prk1	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.192770845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758504	2541900	2541149	278390	277664	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC651.03c	srb10	gyp10	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.051150991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758505	2541900	2539772	278390	276323	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC1734.05c	srb10	spf31	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923321209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758506	2541900	2539335	278390	275901	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC1450.16c	srb10	ptl1	cdk8|prk1	SPCC1450.16c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986190151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758507	2541900	2542826	278390	279273	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC13G6.09	srb10	SPAC13G6.09	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195772638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758508	2541900	2539668	278390	276223	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC11B10.10c	srb10	pht1	cdk8|prk1	pi001	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.103297897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758509	2541900	2540182	278390	276715	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC16G5.06	srb10	SPBC16G5.06	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046596582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758510	2541900	2542416	278390	278880	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC589.03c	srb10	SPAC589.03c	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196541141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758511	2541900	2540992	278390	277508	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC342.05	srb10	crb2	cdk8|prk1	rhp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.292626416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758512	2541900	2539928	278390	276472	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC1604.08c	srb10	imp1	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.560066051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758513	2541900	2543044	278390	279479	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC3C7.12	srb10	tip1	cdk8|prk1	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.175012364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758514	2541900	2538694	278390	275279	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC191.09c	srb10	gst1	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.817169635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758515	2541900	2539702	278390	276255	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC1604.12	srb10	SPBC1604.12	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047722589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758516	2541900	2543525	278390	279943	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC4A8.14	srb10	SPAC4A8.14	cdk8|prk1	prs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383766355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758517	2541900	2540146	278390	276683	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC17A3.06	srb10	SPBC17A3.06	cdk8|prk1	pi040	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.061370986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758518	2541900	2541941	278390	278428	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC20H4.03c	srb10	tfs1	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045511759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758519	2541900	2543337	278390	279760	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC959.08	srb10	rpl2102	cdk8|prk1	rpl21|rpl21-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98686927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758520	2541900	2538861	278390	275441	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC1620.11	srb10	nup97	cdk8|prk1	mug87	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152673712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758521	2541900	2541357	278390	277868	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBPB7E8.01	srb10	SPBPB7E8.01	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446861888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758522	2541900	2543384	278390	279806	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC637.06	srb10	gmh5	cdk8|prk1	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.558044689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758523	2541900	2543327	278390	279750	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC1D4.06c	srb10	csk1	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.981462564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758524	2541900	2540766	278390	277286	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC19C2.02	srb10	pmt1	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923863749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758525	2541900	2543684	278390	280098	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC4G8.03c	srb10	SPAC4G8.03c	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874158761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758526	2541900	2542159	278390	278635	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC1834.09	srb10	mug51	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.803196485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758527	2541900	2539259	278390	275829	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC553.05c	srb10	wtf6	cdk8|prk1	SPCC553.05c|SPCC553.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099630299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758528	2541900	2539531	278390	276093	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC576.02	srb10	SPCC576.02	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193699344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758529	2541900	2543087	278390	279520	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC30C2.04	srb10	SPAC30C2.04	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.921735776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758530	2541900	2539014	278390	275587	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC18B5.05c	srb10	SPCC18B5.05c	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.276861754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758531	2541900	2540314	278390	276844	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC2G5.03	srb10	ctu1	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201720946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758532	2541900	2540558	278390	277085	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC2D10.17	srb10	clr1	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.8368703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758533	2541900	2542424	278390	278886	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC1805.14	srb10	SPAC1805.14	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868227606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758534	2541900	2541869	278390	278359	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC22F3.13	srb10	tsc1	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258420753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758535	2541900	2543333	278390	279756	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC694.02	srb10	SPAC694.02	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440021837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758536	2541900	2542111	278390	278587	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC1687.14c	srb10	SPAC1687.14c	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.847528631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758537	2541900	2541320	278390	277832	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC1271.03c	srb10	SPBC1271.03c	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514552022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758538	2541900	2542890	278390	279334	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC13G6.14	srb10	aps1	cdk8|prk1	SPAC24B11.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.564875461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758539	2541900	2541904	278390	278394	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC22F8.03c	srb10	SPAC22F8.03c	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.058917779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758540	2541900	2542094	278390	278571	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC29B12.06c	srb10	rcd1	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.863473998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758541	2541900	2543646	278390	280060	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC821.07c	srb10	moc3	cdk8|prk1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992834368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758542	2541900	2541062	278390	277577	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC660.11	srb10	tcg1	cdk8|prk1	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.669401436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758543	2541900	2542879	278390	279324	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC13G7.07	srb10	arb2	cdk8|prk1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390656908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758544	2541900	2542571	278390	279027	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC589.02c	srb10	med13	cdk8|prk1	spTrap240|srb9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.466034419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758545	2541089	2539584	277604	276143	SPBC646.09c	SPCC63.03	int6	SPCC63.03	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575519754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758546	2541089	2539841	277604	276389	SPBC646.09c	SPBC17D1.05	int6	SPBC17D1.05	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.615690735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758547	2541089	2540105	277604	276642	SPBC646.09c	SPBC106.04	int6	ada1	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.108604382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758548	2541089	2542598	277604	279052	SPBC646.09c	SPAC6G10.08	int6	idp1	yin6	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.80224827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758549	2541089	2542080	277604	278557	SPBC646.09c	SPAC27D7.03c	int6	mei2	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.344618543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758550	2541089	2541343	277604	277854	SPBC646.09c	SPBPB2B2.19c	int6	SPBPB2B2.19c	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.309753942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758551	2541089	2543635	277604	280049	SPBC646.09c	SPAC3H8.03	int6	img2	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.622160657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758552	2541089	2541426	277604	277931	SPBC646.09c	SPAC227.06	int6	SPAC227.06	yin6	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.281456939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758553	2541089	2541912	277604	278402	SPBC646.09c	SPAC222.16c	int6	csn3	yin6	SPAC821.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041469542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758554	2541089	2538977	277604	275551	SPBC646.09c	SPCC1020.06c	int6	tal1	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.923644725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758555	2541089	2543064	277604	279497	SPBC646.09c	SPAC3G6.01	int6	hrp3	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.495175769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758556	2541089	2542378	277604	278842	SPBC646.09c	SPAC1805.04	int6	nup132	yin6	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573691495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758557	2541089	2541167	277604	277682	SPBC646.09c	SPBC691.05c	int6	SPBC691.05c	yin6	pi030|SPACTOKYO_453.04|SPBP22H7.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.93886823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758558	2541089	2539930	277604	276474	SPBC646.09c	SPBC1198.11c	int6	reb1	yin6	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.39494096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758559	2541089	2543559	277604	279975	SPBC646.09c	SPAC664.04c	int6	rps1602	yin6	rps16|rps16-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.761786488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758560	2541089	2540433	277604	276961	SPBC646.09c	SPBC2D10.06	int6	rep1	yin6	rec16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.432623233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758561	2541089	2540296	277604	276827	SPBC646.09c	SPBC2D10.05	int6	exg3	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.699276941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758562	2541089	2540474	277604	277002	SPBC646.09c	SPBC26H8.09c	int6	snf59	yin6	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.801852289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758563	2541089	2540686	277604	277211	SPBC646.09c	SPBC21D10.10	int6	bdc1	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.436215023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758564	2541089	2542103	277604	278579	SPBC646.09c	SPAC31G5.11	int6	pac2	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.315418313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758565	2541089	2540999	277604	277515	SPBC646.09c	SPBC4B4.04	int6	SPBC4B4.04	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.682593896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758566	2541089	2539332	277604	275898	SPBC646.09c	SPCPB1C11.01	int6	amt1	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.397876125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758567	2541089	3361375	277604	280451	SPBC646.09c	SPAC212.06c	int6	SPAC212.06c	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.83228148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758568	2541089	2539226	277604	275796	SPBC646.09c	SPCC16C4.20c	int6	SPCC16C4.20c	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.435421918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758569	2541089	2539443	277604	276006	SPBC646.09c	SPCC736.02	int6	SPCC736.02	yin6	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038561201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758570	2541089	2542816	277604	279263	SPBC646.09c	SPAC4G8.11c	int6	atp10	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.313801528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758571	2541089	2541994	277604	278478	SPBC646.09c	SPAC26A3.14c	int6	SPAC26A3.14c	yin6	SPAC23A6.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036391025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758572	2541089	2538814	277604	275395	SPBC646.09c	SPCC777.17c	int6	SPCC777.17c	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.415337284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758573	2541089	2541682	277604	278178	SPBC646.09c	SPAC15F9.02	int6	seh1	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.496297385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758574	2541089	2543230	277604	279658	SPBC646.09c	SPAC823.13c	int6	SPAC823.13c	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.338277773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758575	2541089	2540919	277604	277435	SPBC646.09c	SPBC543.07	int6	pek1	yin6	mkk1|skh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.749556331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758576	2541089	2540945	277604	277461	SPBC646.09c	SPBC342.06c	int6	rtt109	yin6	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.264849473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758577	2541089	2542848	277604	279294	SPBC646.09c	SPAC9G1.03c	int6	rpl3001	yin6	rpl30|rpl30-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.073441114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758578	2541089	2541558	277604	278057	SPBC646.09c	SPAC1F7.08	int6	fio1	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.492883428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758579	2541089	2542182	277604	278657	SPBC646.09c	SPAC19B12.08	int6	atg4	yin6	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817644065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758580	2541089	2540463	277604	276991	SPBC646.09c	SPBC2F12.15c	int6	pfa3	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.18073663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758581	2541089	2540993	277604	277509	SPBC646.09c	SPBC342.01c	int6	alg6	yin6	SPBC3F6.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509054746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758582	2541089	2543586	277604	280001	SPBC646.09c	SPAC458.04c	int6	dli1	yin6	dil1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.395373397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758583	2541089	2542318	277604	278784	SPBC646.09c	SPAC16C9.05	int6	cph1	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.22077038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758584	2541089	2541527	277604	278027	SPBC646.09c	SPAC31A2.09c	int6	apm4	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.585507722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758585	2541089	2541960	277604	278447	SPBC646.09c	SPAC6G9.15c	int6	SPAC6G9.15c	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.963285182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758586	2541089	2540127	277604	276664	SPBC646.09c	SPBC106.20	int6	exo70	yin6	SPBC582.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.249829718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758587	2541089	2543108	277604	279540	SPBC646.09c	SPAC3A12.13c	int6	SPAC3A12.13c	yin6	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038252992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758588	2541089	2541522	277604	278023	SPBC646.09c	SPAC23E2.01	int6	fep1	yin6	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386301953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758589	2541089	2543584	277604	279999	SPBC646.09c	SPAPB1E7.11c	int6	SPAPB1E7.11c	yin6	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.257417578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758590	2541089	2539352	277604	275918	SPBC646.09c	SPCC188.07	int6	ccq1	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57077469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758591	2541089	2542640	277604	279094	SPBC646.09c	SPAC9E9.12c	int6	ybt1	yin6	abc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.824704752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758592	2541089	2542253	277604	278723	SPBC646.09c	SPAC17H9.04c	int6	SPAC17H9.04c	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.994055528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758593	2541089	3361543	277604	280619	SPBC646.09c	SPAC9.13c	int6	cwf16	yin6	SPAPJ735.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.821687818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758594	2541089	2542554	277604	279011	SPBC646.09c	SPAC1952.03	int6	otu2	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.441192575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758595	2541089	2542331	277604	278797	SPBC646.09c	SPAC1834.05	int6	alg9	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.889890787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758596	2541089	2539056	277604	275629	SPBC646.09c	SPCC126.11c	int6	SPCC126.11c	yin6	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048162388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758597	2541089	2539467	277604	276030	SPBC646.09c	SPCC417.07c	int6	mto1	yin6	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.759596256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758598	2541089	2543511	277604	279929	SPBC646.09c	SPAC4G9.19	int6	SPAC4G9.19	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.201579023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758599	2541089	2543385	277604	279807	SPBC646.09c	SPAC4G9.12	int6	SPAC4G9.12	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.114309447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758600	2541089	2541545	277604	278045	SPBC646.09c	SPAC22F8.07c	int6	rtf1	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.151738185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758601	2541089	2542123	277604	278599	SPBC646.09c	SPAC18G6.15	int6	mal3	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.37457486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758602	2541089	2540673	277604	277198	SPBC646.09c	SPBC1D7.03	int6	mug80	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.050031567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758603	2541089	2542971	277604	279410	SPBC646.09c	SPAC105.02c	int6	SPAC105.02c	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992050717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758604	2541089	2542543	277604	279000	SPBC646.09c	SPAC30D11.11	int6	SPAC30D11.11	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.42231721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758605	2541089	2540363	277604	276892	SPBC646.09c	SPBC2F12.09c	int6	atf21	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.042170444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758606	2541089	2542420	277604	278883	SPBC646.09c	SPAC19D5.03	int6	cid1	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.323998331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758607	2541089	2539898	277604	276444	SPBC646.09c	SPBC12D12.07c	int6	trx2	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.546418685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758608	2541089	2541889	277604	278379	SPBC646.09c	SPAC2F7.03c	int6	pom1	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503305731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758609	2541089	2542989	277604	279427	SPBC646.09c	SPAC11E3.13c	int6	gas5	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.351293263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758610	2541089	2543358	277604	279780	SPBC646.09c	SPAC688.10	int6	rev3	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.175569039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758611	2541089	2539857	277604	276404	SPBC646.09c	SPBC1604.20c	int6	tea2	yin6	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6995524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758612	2541089	2542357	277604	278822	SPBC646.09c	SPAC1782.07	int6	qcr8	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.994248718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758613	2541089	2540801	277604	277320	SPBC646.09c	SPBC18H10.10c	int6	saf4	yin6	cwc16|cwf16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.501735291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758614	2541089	2541739	277604	278233	SPBC646.09c	SPAC2G11.10c	int6	SPAC2G11.10c	yin6	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040527573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758615	2541089	2543396	277604	279818	SPBC646.09c	SPAC4D7.11	int6	dsc4	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.429637524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758616	2541089	2540538	277604	277065	SPBC646.09c	SPBC26H8.03	int6	cho2	yin6	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927201087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758617	2541089	2539667	277604	276222	SPBC646.09c	SPBC13G1.08c	int6	ash2	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.518632068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758618	2541089	2540628	277604	277154	SPBC646.09c	SPBC25B2.08	int6	SPBC25B2.08	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852254724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758619	2541089	2542976	277604	279414	SPBC646.09c	SPAC9E9.09c	int6	atd1	yin6	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.391832951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758620	2541089	2539974	277604	276518	SPBC646.09c	SPBC32H8.07	int6	git5	yin6	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.055393487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758621	2541089	2541241	277604	277755	SPBC646.09c	SPBC887.17	int6	SPBC887.17	yin6	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.882942538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758622	2541089	2539232	277604	275802	SPBC646.09c	SPCC1223.04c	int6	set11	yin6	mug76	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.371843267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758623	2541089	2542431	277604	278893	SPBC646.09c	SPAC1A6.01c	int6	SPAC1A6.01c	yin6	SPAC23C4.20c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932510959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758624	2541089	2542549	277604	279006	SPBC646.09c	SPAC19A8.11c	int6	SPAC19A8.11c	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.368466619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758625	2541089	2541954	277604	278441	SPBC646.09c	SPAC23C4.05c	int6	SPAC23C4.05c	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.612340175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758626	2541089	2539368	277604	275934	SPBC646.09c	SPCC16A11.07	int6	coq10	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.198714255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758627	2541089	2541053	277604	277568	SPBC646.09c	SPBC56F2.10c	int6	alg5	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.207248771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758628	2541089	2540967	277604	277483	SPBC646.09c	SPBC36B7.08c	int6	SPBC36B7.08c	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.51650648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758629	2541089	2540882	277604	277399	SPBC646.09c	SPBC4F6.08c	int6	mrpl39	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.619861484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758630	2541089	2538884	277604	275462	SPBC646.09c	SPCC1393.08	int6	SPCC1393.08	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.939444851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758631	2541089	2539421	277604	275986	SPBC646.09c	SPCC794.11c	int6	ent3	yin6	SPCC794.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.363548652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758632	2541089	2539993	277604	276537	SPBC646.09c	SPBC1105.05	int6	exg1	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.784654471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758633	2541089	2540193	277604	276726	SPBC646.09c	SPBC1289.10c	int6	adn2	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.443491469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758634	2541089	2541742	277604	278236	SPBC646.09c	SPAC22H10.09	int6	SPAC22H10.09	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.075423285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758635	2541089	2543113	277604	279545	SPBC646.09c	SPAC3F10.07c	int6	erf4	yin6	mug91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.048349249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758636	2541089	2539476	277604	276039	SPBC646.09c	SPCC364.04c	int6	coy1	yin6	SPCC364.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.646083274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758637	2541089	2543391	277604	279813	SPBC646.09c	SPAC4G9.09c	int6	arg11	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.178349738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758638	2541089	2543332	277604	279755	SPBC646.09c	SPAPB8E5.04c	int6	SPAPB8E5.04c	yin6	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037391035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758639	2541089	2538762	277604	275345	SPBC646.09c	SPCC306.04c	int6	set1	yin6	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.428243328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758640	2541089	2543628	277604	280042	SPBC646.09c	SPAC3H8.10	int6	spo20	yin6	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.372914012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758641	2541089	2539555	277604	276116	SPBC646.09c	SPCC4B3.08	int6	lsg1	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.203015648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758642	2541089	2543670	277604	280084	SPBC646.09c	SPAPB1E7.06c	int6	eme1	yin6	mms4|slx2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869997258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758643	2541089	2543662	277604	280076	SPBC646.09c	SPAC9.07c	int6	SPAC9.07c	yin6	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924528802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758644	2541089	2541425	277604	277930	SPBC646.09c	SPAC2C4.17c	int6	msy2	yin6	SPAC2C4.17c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.459372096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758645	2541089	2538756	277604	275339	SPBC646.09c	SPCC1795.10c	int6	SPCC1795.10c	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.057213173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758646	2541089	2540829	277604	277347	SPBC646.09c	SPBC800.09	int6	sum2	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.472827734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758647	2541089	2541404	277604	277913	SPBC646.09c	SPBPB2B2.18	int6	SPBPB2B2.18	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.991222265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758648	2541089	2541380	277604	277891	SPBC646.09c	SPBPB2B2.13	int6	gal1	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.139163736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758649	2541089	5802702	277604	857840	SPBC646.09c	SPCC1235.15	int6	dga1	yin6	SPCC548.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.50696174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758650	2541089	2543380	277604	279802	SPBC646.09c	SPAC4G9.16c	int6	rpl901	yin6	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.69762199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758651	2541089	2538840	277604	275421	SPBC646.09c	SPCC736.07c	int6	SPCC736.07c	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380397416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758652	2541089	2542119	277604	278595	SPBC646.09c	SPAC1834.08	int6	mak1	yin6	phk3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.879566427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758653	2541089	2541806	277604	278297	SPBC646.09c	SPAC4G8.13c	int6	prz1	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.758597069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758654	2541089	2541774	277604	278268	SPBC646.09c	SPAC22E12.05c	int6	rer1	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.195518237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758655	2541089	2543327	277604	279750	SPBC646.09c	SPAC1D4.06c	int6	csk1	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.216150236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758656	2541089	2538854	277604	275435	SPBC646.09c	SPCP1E11.05c	int6	are2	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.496456345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758657	2541089	2543076	277604	279509	SPBC646.09c	SPAC30C2.07	int6	SPAC30C2.07	yin6	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812664913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758658	2541089	2542175	277604	278650	SPBC646.09c	SPAC1F3.02c	int6	mkh1	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.397328257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758659	2541089	2541050	277604	277565	SPBC646.09c	SPBC428.05c	int6	arg12	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.193572864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758660	2541089	2540383	277604	276912	SPBC646.09c	SPBC31E1.02c	int6	pmr1	yin6	cps5|pgak2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.802750661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758661	2541089	2540309	277604	276839	SPBC646.09c	SPBC21B10.13c	int6	yox1	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.393718701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758662	2541089	2540938	277604	277454	SPBC646.09c	SPBC365.14c	int6	uge1	yin6	gal10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776838515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758663	2541089	2543472	277604	279892	SPBC646.09c	SPAC959.04c	int6	omh6	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.509359983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758664	2541089	2541576	277604	278073	SPBC646.09c	SPBC1348.02	int6	SPBC1348.02	yin6	SPAC1348.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.372512634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758665	2541089	2541875	277604	278365	SPBC646.09c	SPAC22F3.06c	int6	lon1	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.694701223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758666	2541089	2540787	277604	277306	SPBC646.09c	SPBC1921.07c	int6	sgf29	yin6	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.876205763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758667	2541089	2542208	277604	278683	SPBC646.09c	SPAC17G8.08c	int6	SPAC17G8.08c	yin6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.43403089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758668	2542928	2541900	279369	278390	SPAC1142.06	SPAC23H4.17c	get3	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.10968149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758669	2542928	2540555	279369	277082	SPAC1142.06	SPBP16F5.02	get3	mcs2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.716691598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758670	3361403	2541051	280479	277566	SPAC27D7.12c	SPBC3E7.08c	but1	rad13	SPAC27D7.12|mug107|prx	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913885513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758671	3361403	2539564	280479	276125	SPAC27D7.12c	SPCC550.12	but1	arp6	SPAC27D7.12|mug107|prx	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923071297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758672	3361403	2542318	280479	278784	SPAC27D7.12c	SPAC16C9.05	but1	cph1	SPAC27D7.12|mug107|prx	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.941531089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758673	3361403	2541249	280479	277763	SPAC27D7.12c	SPBC947.01	but1	alf1	SPAC27D7.12|mug107|prx	SPBC947.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.920978828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758674	3361403	2543406	280479	279828	SPAC27D7.12c	SPAC9.12c	but1	atp12	SPAC27D7.12|mug107|prx	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.20335382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758675	3361403	2542829	280479	279276	SPAC27D7.12c	SPAC13D6.02c	but1	byr3	SPAC27D7.12|mug107|prx	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045446485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758676	3361403	2542453	280479	278914	SPAC27D7.12c	SPAC186.01	but1	pfl9	SPAC27D7.12|mug107|prx	SPAC186.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.347479576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758677	3361403	3361389	280479	280465	SPAC27D7.12c	SPAC977.13c	but1	SPAC977.13c	SPAC27D7.12|mug107|prx	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.632910354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758678	3361403	2539246	280479	275816	SPAC27D7.12c	SPCC18.13	but1	SPCC18.13	SPAC27D7.12|mug107|prx	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51119047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758679	3361403	2543136	280479	279568	SPAC27D7.12c	SPBC1348.07	but1	SPBC1348.07	SPAC27D7.12|mug107|prx	SPAC1348.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044728499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758680	3361403	2538714	280479	275298	SPAC27D7.12c	SPCC330.11	but1	btb1	SPAC27D7.12|mug107|prx	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.816584947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758681	3361403	2541297	280479	277809	SPAC27D7.12c	SPBC9B6.07	but1	nop52	SPAC27D7.12|mug107|prx	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042481952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758682	2540327	2543529	276857	279947	SPBC31F10.07	SPAC4C5.02c	lsb5	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.617789742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758683	2540327	2542293	276857	278761	SPBC31F10.07	SPAC17G8.14c	lsb5	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.553371349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758684	2540327	2541117	276857	277632	SPBC31F10.07	SPBC646.13	lsb5	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194555919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758685	2540327	2541013	276857	277528	SPBC31F10.07	SPBC3H7.13	lsb5	far10	-	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.437389026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758686	2540327	2539117	276857	275689	SPBC31F10.07	SPCC74.06	lsb5	mak3	-	phk2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.893798631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758687	2540327	2540425	276857	276953	SPBC31F10.07	SPBC27.06c	lsb5	mgr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923049614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758688	2540327	2541834	276857	278325	SPBC31F10.07	SPAC824.08	lsb5	gda1	-	gdp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.839367148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758689	2540327	2539023	276857	275596	SPBC31F10.07	SPCC594.05c	lsb5	spf1	-	spp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.851875921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758690	2540327	2539845	276857	276393	SPBC31F10.07	SPBC12C2.02c	lsb5	ste20	-	ste16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.969318148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758691	2540327	2541828	276857	278319	SPBC31F10.07	SPAC22H12.05c	lsb5	fsc1	-	SPAC22H12.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934394049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758692	2540327	2542070	276857	278547	SPBC31F10.07	SPAC29B12.02c	lsb5	set2	-	kmt3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045561995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758693	2540327	2541900	276857	278390	SPBC31F10.07	SPAC23H4.17c	lsb5	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.503559392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758694	2540327	2542010	276857	278493	SPBC31F10.07	SPAC20H4.05c	lsb5	SPAC20H4.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097217525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758695	2540327	2543315	276857	279739	SPBC31F10.07	SPAC6B12.07c	lsb5	SPAC6B12.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87352625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758696	2540327	2541614	276857	278111	SPBC31F10.07	SPAC29A4.20	lsb5	elp3	-	kat9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.513243223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758697	2540327	2540643	276857	277168	SPBC31F10.07	SPBC19G7.06	lsb5	mbx1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262147173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758698	2540327	2542869	276857	279314	SPBC31F10.07	SPAC140.02	lsb5	gar2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98953555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758699	2540327	2543391	276857	279813	SPBC31F10.07	SPAC4G9.09c	lsb5	arg11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817356521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758700	2540327	2538966	276857	275540	SPBC31F10.07	SPCC18.10	lsb5	SPCC18.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.125786691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758701	2540327	2540122	276857	276659	SPBC31F10.07	SPBC1778.03c	lsb5	SPBC1778.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.97668466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758702	2540327	2542424	276857	278886	SPBC31F10.07	SPAC1805.14	lsb5	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871926932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758703	2540327	2538730	276857	275314	SPBC31F10.07	SPCC31H12.02c	lsb5	mug73	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865537937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758704	2542682	2538939	279135	275514	SPAC26A3.09c	SPCC1672.04c	rga2	SPCC1672.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.993957303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758705	2542682	2542895	279135	279339	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC13G6.10c	rga2	asl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.377096596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758706	2542682	2542812	279135	279259	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC6F6.01	rga2	cch1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.988057443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758707	2542682	2541912	279135	278402	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC222.16c	rga2	csn3	-	SPAC821.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.515751809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758708	2542682	2542378	279135	278842	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC1805.04	rga2	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.186201394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758709	2542682	2539202	279135	275773	SPAC26A3.09c	SPCC162.10	rga2	ppk33	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391249899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758710	2542682	2539196	279135	275767	SPAC26A3.09c	SPCC1795.03	rga2	gms1	-	gmn3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328229935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758711	2542682	2540347	279135	276876	SPAC26A3.09c	SPBC30B4.08	rga2	eri1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.185781637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758712	2542682	2543661	279135	280075	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC644.08	rga2	SPAC644.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.617493641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758713	2542682	2539564	279135	276125	SPAC26A3.09c	SPCC550.12	rga2	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.460153298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758714	2542682	2542689	279135	279142	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC29B12.04	rga2	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.910729171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758715	2542682	2539434	279135	275997	SPAC26A3.09c	SPCC757.09c	rga2	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.508536665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758716	2542682	2541026	279135	277541	SPAC26A3.09c	SPBC337.09	rga2	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.755000399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758717	2542682	2542555	279135	279012	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC1952.06c	rga2	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.429339487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758718	2542682	2539797	279135	276347	SPAC26A3.09c	SPBC16G5.14c	rga2	rps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581006565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758719	2542682	2541669	279135	278165	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC22G7.07c	rga2	ime4	-	SPAC22G7.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.644044126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758720	2542682	2540883	279135	277400	SPAC26A3.09c	SPBC577.06c	rga2	stt4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.567010502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758721	2542682	2539381	279135	275947	SPAC26A3.09c	SPCC1739.10	rga2	mug33	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439879535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758722	2542682	2541021	279135	277536	SPAC26A3.09c	SPBC3B8.10c	rga2	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.766529318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758723	2542682	2542568	279135	279024	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC1952.02	rga2	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.195589049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758724	2542682	2541700	279135	278196	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC32A11.02c	rga2	SPAC32A11.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.255537186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758725	2542682	2542177	279135	278652	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC17H9.08	rga2	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.045885184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758726	2542682	2540797	279135	277316	SPAC26A3.09c	SPBC18H10.11c	rga2	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.35239026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758727	2542682	2541250	279135	277764	SPAC26A3.09c	SPBC8D2.17	rga2	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.561392161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758728	2542682	2543144	279135	279576	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC3F10.05c	rga2	mug113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.435570234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758729	2542682	2543412	279135	279834	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC637.07	rga2	moe1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808662639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758730	2542682	2540673	279135	277198	SPAC26A3.09c	SPBC1D7.03	rga2	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851863388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758731	2542682	2541578	279135	278075	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC25B8.05	rga2	deg1	-	SPAC25B8.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.959521605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758732	2542682	2542902	279135	279346	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC144.05	rga2	SPAC144.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.040178192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758733	2542682	2540326	279135	276856	SPAC26A3.09c	SPBC2G5.06c	rga2	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.073332968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758734	2542682	2542014	279135	278497	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC20H4.04	rga2	fml2	-	mfh2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636905011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758735	2542682	2541828	279135	278319	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC22H12.05c	rga2	fsc1	-	SPAC22H12.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.901011006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758736	2542682	2538982	279135	275556	SPAC26A3.09c	SPCC1450.12	rga2	SPCC1450.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387521786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758737	2542682	2541464	279135	277966	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC222.08c	rga2	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.381444903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758738	2542682	2543193	279135	279622	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC3F10.11c	rga2	abc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189377543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758739	2542682	2540946	279135	277462	SPAC26A3.09c	SPBC36.04	rga2	cys11	-	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.479031322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758740	2542682	2541762	279135	278256	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC139.01c	rga2	SPAC139.01c	-	SPAC955.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.052895345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758741	2542682	2542625	279135	279079	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC24H6.11c	rga2	SPAC24H6.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.067674702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758742	2542682	2539763	279135	276314	SPAC26A3.09c	SPBC1861.05	rga2	SPBC1861.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987483346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758743	2542682	2539490	279135	276053	SPAC26A3.09c	SPCC364.07	rga2	ser3	-	SPCC364.07|SPCC4G3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.910518899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758744	2542682	2540226	279135	276758	SPAC26A3.09c	SPBC32H8.08c	rga2	omh5	-	pi016|SPACTOKYO_453.20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.06633886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758745	2542682	2539137	279135	275709	SPAC26A3.09c	SPCC1682.08c	rga2	mcp2	-	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.055908367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758746	2542682	2542541	279135	278998	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC1B3.03c	rga2	wis2	-	cyp5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.009440108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758747	2542682	2542030	279135	278512	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC23C11.07	rga2	SPAC23C11.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.439523203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758748	2542682	2540829	279135	277347	SPAC26A3.09c	SPBC800.09	rga2	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.629297217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758749	2542682	2542878	279135	279323	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC57A10.09c	rga2	nhp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647569087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758750	2542682	2541744	279135	278238	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC23A1.02c	rga2	SPAC23A1.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.499339933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758751	2542682	2541941	279135	278428	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC20H4.03c	rga2	tfs1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446786878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758752	2542682	3361165	279135	280241	SPAC26A3.09c	SPBC1348.12	rga2	SPBC1348.12	-	SPAC1348.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63303722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758753	2542682	2543513	279135	279931	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC821.06	rga2	spn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.679576512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758754	2542682	2539700	279135	276253	SPAC26A3.09c	SPBC1685.15c	rga2	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.748278062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758755	2542682	2541627	279135	278123	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC1F5.08c	rga2	yam8	-	ehs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.980470309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758756	2542682	2539128	279135	275700	SPAC26A3.09c	SPCC1682.06	rga2	SPCC1682.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643470431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758757	2542682	2538981	279135	275555	SPAC26A3.09c	SPCC330.06c	rga2	pmp20	-	SPCC330.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868976978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758758	2542682	2543624	279135	280038	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC4D7.06c	rga2	SPAC4D7.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700699148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758759	2542682	2542073	279135	278550	SPAC26A3.09c	SPAC26F1.01	rga2	sec74	-	SPAPJ691.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317232841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758760	2541552	2542585	278051	279040	SPAC1142.08	SPAC31A2.13c	fhl1	sft1	SPAC8C9.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816884357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758761	2541552	2540913	278051	277429	SPAC1142.08	SPBC56F2.08c	fhl1	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC8C9.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.062377379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758762	2541552	2542502	278051	278960	SPAC1142.08	SPAC139.06	fhl1	hat1	SPAC8C9.01	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.843348124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758763	2541552	2543432	278051	279852	SPAC1142.08	SPAC4G8.05	fhl1	ppk14	SPAC8C9.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.372040323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758764	2541552	2541733	278051	278227	SPAC1142.08	SPAC27F1.03c	fhl1	uch1	SPAC8C9.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.307592249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758765	2541552	2542701	278051	279154	SPAC1142.08	SPAC26H5.05	fhl1	mga2	SPAC8C9.01	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.068800284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758766	2541552	2538922	278051	275499	SPAC1142.08	SPCC16C4.10	fhl1	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC8C9.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.305434972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758767	2541552	2539420	278051	275985	SPAC1142.08	SPCC970.07c	fhl1	raf2	SPAC8C9.01	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.312240458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758768	2541552	2541205	278051	277719	SPAC1142.08	SPBC839.02	fhl1	SPBC839.02	SPAC8C9.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.680875836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758769	2541552	2542724	278051	279175	SPAC1142.08	SPAC767.01c	fhl1	vps1	SPAC8C9.01	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704033628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758770	2541552	2539331	278051	275897	SPAC1142.08	SPCC24B10.09	fhl1	rps1702	SPAC8C9.01	rps17|rps17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.448885689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758771	2541552	2539937	278051	276481	SPAC1142.08	SPBC1539.08	fhl1	arf6	SPAC8C9.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.832383348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758772	2541552	2542012	278051	278495	SPAC1142.08	SPAC23C11.02c	fhl1	rps23	SPAC8C9.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453614766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758773	2541552	2540993	278051	277509	SPAC1142.08	SPBC342.01c	fhl1	alg6	SPAC8C9.01	SPBC3F6.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935435251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758774	2541552	2542991	278051	279429	SPAC1142.08	SPAC11D3.05	fhl1	mfs2	SPAC8C9.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379361636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758775	2541552	2540964	278051	277480	SPAC1142.08	SPBC365.16	fhl1	SPBC365.16	SPAC8C9.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.612418432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758776	2541552	2542554	278051	279011	SPAC1142.08	SPAC1952.03	fhl1	otu2	SPAC8C9.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.654013329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758777	2541552	2541664	278051	278160	SPAC1142.08	SPAC2H10.01	fhl1	SPAC2H10.01	SPAC8C9.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.130208741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758778	2541552	2541741	278051	278235	SPAC1142.08	SPAC20G4.02c	fhl1	fus1	SPAC8C9.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.985283085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758779	2541552	2541776	278051	278270	SPAC1142.08	SPAC23H3.05c	fhl1	swd1	SPAC8C9.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.127191214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758780	2541552	2539984	278051	276528	SPAC1142.08	SPBC1289.11	fhl1	spf38	SPAC8C9.01	cwf17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.475058084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758781	2541552	2539046	278051	275619	SPAC1142.08	SPCC1223.12c	fhl1	meu10	SPAC8C9.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.626540689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758782	2541552	2542168	278051	278643	SPAC1142.08	SPAC17A5.16	fhl1	ftp105	SPAC8C9.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450569098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758783	2541552	2543101	278051	279533	SPAC1142.08	SPAC323.03c	fhl1	SPAC323.03c	SPAC8C9.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.561660548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758784	2541552	2542032	278051	278514	SPAC1142.08	SPAC23C11.04c	fhl1	pnk1	SPAC8C9.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.988220206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758785	2541552	2538841	278051	275422	SPAC1142.08	SPCC550.03c	fhl1	SPCC550.03c	SPAC8C9.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.91463326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758786	2541552	2541248	278051	277762	SPAC1142.08	SPBC8D2.10c	fhl1	rmt3	SPAC8C9.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704326105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758787	2541552	2543378	278051	279800	SPAC1142.08	SPAC3H8.07c	fhl1	pac10	SPAC8C9.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.832319551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758788	2541552	2539958	278051	276502	SPAC1142.08	SPBC1718.07c	fhl1	zfs1	SPAC8C9.01	moc4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.379248242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758789	2541552	2542056	278051	278535	SPAC1142.08	SPAC6G9.14	fhl1	SPAC6G9.14	SPAC8C9.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.331018373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758790	2541552	2543059	278051	279493	SPAC1142.08	SPAC30.04c	fhl1	abc4	SPAC8C9.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.984770133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758791	2541552	2539427	278051	275992	SPAC1142.08	SPCC663.15c	fhl1	SPCC663.15c	SPAC8C9.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442416131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758792	2541552	2541186	278051	277700	SPAC1142.08	SPBC725.01	fhl1	SPBC725.01	SPAC8C9.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.316635828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758793	2541552	2541614	278051	278111	SPAC1142.08	SPAC29A4.20	fhl1	elp3	SPAC8C9.01	kat9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.353478002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758794	2541552	2540229	278051	276761	SPAC1142.08	SPBC31F10.15c	fhl1	atp15	SPAC8C9.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.575552404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758795	2541552	2543515	278051	279933	SPAC1142.08	SPAC4F10.14c	fhl1	btf3	SPAC8C9.01	btt1|egd1|nac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.070259424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758796	2541552	2542516	278051	278974	SPAC1142.08	SPAC2F7.04	fhl1	pmc2	SPAC8C9.01	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51818456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758797	2541552	2539438	278051	276001	SPAC1142.08	SPCC4B3.07	fhl1	nro1	SPAC8C9.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.929497916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758798	2541552	2541175	278051	277689	SPAC1142.08	SPBC839.13c	fhl1	rpl1601	SPAC8C9.01	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.754277552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758799	2541552	2540531	278051	277059	SPAC1142.08	SPBC23E6.08	fhl1	sat1	SPAC8C9.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.688697723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758800	2541552	2543662	278051	280076	SPAC1142.08	SPAC9.07c	fhl1	SPAC9.07c	SPAC8C9.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325296816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758801	2541552	2541531	278051	278031	SPAC1142.08	SPAC25A8.01c	fhl1	fft3	SPAC8C9.01	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.170743658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758802	2541552	2539013	278051	275586	SPAC1142.08	SPCC364.03	fhl1	rpl1702	SPAC8C9.01	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.739442471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758803	2541552	2543329	278051	279752	SPAC1142.08	SPAC56F8.02	fhl1	SPAC56F8.02	SPAC8C9.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378350704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758804	2541552	2540325	278051	276855	SPAC1142.08	SPBC21B10.10	fhl1	rps402	SPAC8C9.01	rps4-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321620569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758805	2541552	2542262	278051	278731	SPAC1142.08	SPAC17C9.10	fhl1	stm1	SPAC8C9.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.275796896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758806	2541552	2543516	278051	279934	SPAC1142.08	SPAC4F10.11	fhl1	spn1	SPAC8C9.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.072383917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758807	2541552	2540146	278051	276683	SPAC1142.08	SPBC17A3.06	fhl1	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC8C9.01	pi040	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.845919538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758808	2541552	2538840	278051	275421	SPAC1142.08	SPCC736.07c	fhl1	SPCC736.07c	SPAC8C9.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.456349046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758809	2541552	2541675	278051	278171	SPAC1142.08	SPAC22F8.12c	fhl1	shf1	SPAC8C9.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.942894015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758810	2541552	2541357	278051	277868	SPAC1142.08	SPBPB7E8.01	fhl1	SPBPB7E8.01	SPAC8C9.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.187864875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758811	2541552	2541806	278051	278297	SPAC1142.08	SPAC4G8.13c	fhl1	prz1	SPAC8C9.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.984666682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758812	2541552	2541491	278051	277993	SPAC1142.08	SPAC2C4.16c	fhl1	rps801	SPAC8C9.01	rps8|rps8-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.989882021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758813	2541552	2543372	278051	279794	SPAC1142.08	SPAPB1A10.09	fhl1	ase1	SPAC8C9.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.48051551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758814	2541552	2542571	278051	279027	SPAC1142.08	SPAC589.02c	fhl1	med13	SPAC8C9.01	spTrap240|srb9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.06857906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758815	2541552	2540649	278051	277174	SPAC1142.08	SPBC19F8.08	fhl1	rps401	SPAC8C9.01	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439664836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758816	2539348	2542585	275914	279040	SPCC18B5.07c	SPAC31A2.13c	nup61	sft1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.26286529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758817	2539348	2543432	275914	279852	SPCC18B5.07c	SPAC4G8.05	nup61	ppk14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.014268333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758818	2539348	2539463	275914	276026	SPCC18B5.07c	SPCC550.11	nup61	SPCC550.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.485433766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758819	2539348	2542012	275914	278495	SPCC18B5.07c	SPAC23C11.02c	nup61	rps23	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.073651995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758820	2539348	2542165	275914	278641	SPCC18B5.07c	SPAC1782.08c	nup61	rex3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.051892675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758821	2539348	2540425	275914	276953	SPCC18B5.07c	SPBC27.06c	nup61	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.702066919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758822	2539348	2542331	275914	278797	SPCC18B5.07c	SPAC1834.05	nup61	alg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.986458038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758823	2539348	2542239	275914	278711	SPCC18B5.07c	SPAC18G6.02c	nup61	chp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.330519404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758824	2539348	2540831	275914	277349	SPCC18B5.07c	SPBC428.02c	nup61	eca39	-	SPBC582.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.191450756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758825	2539348	2542193	275914	278668	SPCC18B5.07c	SPAC9G1.11c	nup61	spn4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.94571994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758826	2539348	2542254	275914	278724	SPCC18B5.07c	SPAC30D11.04c	nup61	nup124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.340598193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758827	2539348	2541536	275914	278036	SPCC18B5.07c	SPAC1071.02	nup61	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.836421754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758828	2539348	2540967	275914	277483	SPCC18B5.07c	SPBC36B7.08c	nup61	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.249939188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758829	2539348	2541017	275914	277532	SPCC18B5.07c	SPBC36.07	nup61	elp1	-	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869398127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758830	2539348	2541713	275914	278208	SPCC18B5.07c	SPAC3A12.12	nup61	atp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049609363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758831	2539348	2541371	275914	277882	SPCC18B5.07c	SPBP4H10.17c	nup61	SPBP4H10.17c	-	mrps2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.893313289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758832	2539348	2542883	275914	279328	SPCC18B5.07c	SPAC1486.04c	nup61	alm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.104862235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758833	2539348	2539928	275914	276472	SPCC18B5.07c	SPBC1604.08c	nup61	imp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.750207546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758834	2539348	2538792	275914	275373	SPCC18B5.07c	SPCP1E11.10	nup61	SPCP1E11.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.487885582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758835	2539348	2543384	275914	279806	SPCC18B5.07c	SPAC637.06	nup61	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.836893335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758836	2539348	2540314	275914	276844	SPCC18B5.07c	SPBC2G5.03	nup61	ctu1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814112508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758837	2539348	2539743	275914	276295	SPCC18B5.07c	SPBC16A3.08c	nup61	oga1	-	SPBC16A3.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700059164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758838	2539348	2543644	275914	280058	SPCC18B5.07c	SPAPB1A10.03	nup61	nxt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.656762602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758839	2539348	2541576	275914	278073	SPCC18B5.07c	SPBC1348.02	nup61	SPBC1348.02	-	SPAC1348.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.982147586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758840	2539348	2543463	275914	279883	SPCC18B5.07c	SPAPB21F2.03	nup61	slx9	-	SPAPB21F2.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.799798626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758841	2538955	2542358	275529	278823	SPCC1450.02	SPAC1782.09c	bdf1	clp1	SPCC191.13|brf1	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.327020052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758842	2538955	2541117	275529	277632	SPCC1450.02	SPBC646.13	bdf1	sds23	SPCC191.13|brf1	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.320147771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758843	2538955	2540161	275529	276696	SPCC1450.02	SPBC13E7.03c	bdf1	SPBC13E7.03c	SPCC191.13|brf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.354823361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758844	2538955	2540686	275529	277211	SPCC1450.02	SPBC21D10.10	bdf1	bdc1	SPCC191.13|brf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329210034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758845	2538955	2541013	275529	277528	SPCC1450.02	SPBC3H7.13	bdf1	far10	SPCC191.13|brf1	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450483029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758846	2538955	2542273	275529	278742	SPCC1450.02	SPAC17H9.13c	bdf1	SPAC17H9.13c	SPCC191.13|brf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.57010231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758847	2538955	2542689	275529	279142	SPCC1450.02	SPAC29B12.04	bdf1	snz1	SPCC191.13|brf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197429429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758848	2538955	2540425	275529	276953	SPCC1450.02	SPBC27.06c	bdf1	mgr2	SPCC191.13|brf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.627889888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758849	2538955	2542318	275529	278784	SPCC1450.02	SPAC16C9.05	bdf1	cph1	SPCC191.13|brf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.752185765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758850	2538955	2543584	275529	279999	SPCC1450.02	SPAPB1E7.11c	bdf1	SPAPB1E7.11c	SPCC191.13|brf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771674364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758851	2538955	2543426	275529	279846	SPCC1450.02	SPAC631.02	bdf1	bdf2	SPCC191.13|brf1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.5433485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758852	2538955	2541021	275529	277536	SPCC1450.02	SPBC3B8.10c	bdf1	nem1	SPCC191.13|brf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.381371034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758853	2538955	2543020	275529	279456	SPCC1450.02	SPAC10F6.13c	bdf1	SPAC10F6.13c	SPCC191.13|brf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.623858112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758854	2538955	2542007	275529	278490	SPCC1450.02	SPAC20H4.07	bdf1	rad57	SPCC191.13|brf1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581765313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758855	2538955	2541009	275529	277524	SPCC1450.02	SPBC428.04	bdf1	apq12	SPCC191.13|brf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.014613187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758856	2538955	2542439	275529	278901	SPCC1450.02	SPAC17A5.08	bdf1	erp2	SPCC191.13|brf1	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.37447807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758857	2538955	2540990	275529	277506	SPCC1450.02	SPBC36B7.06c	bdf1	mug20	SPCC191.13|brf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.488985036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758858	2538955	2539812	275529	276362	SPCC1450.02	SPBC1347.02	bdf1	fkbp39	SPCC191.13|brf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579650712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758859	2538955	2541156	275529	277671	SPCC1450.02	SPBC685.07c	bdf1	rpl2701	SPCC191.13|brf1	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.269002869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758860	2538955	2543628	275529	280042	SPCC1450.02	SPAC3H8.10	bdf1	spo20	SPCC191.13|brf1	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.910085648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758861	2538955	2540619	275529	277145	SPCC1450.02	SPBC25H2.15	bdf1	SPBC25H2.15	SPCC191.13|brf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.271766472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758862	2538955	2541175	275529	277689	SPCC1450.02	SPBC839.13c	bdf1	rpl1601	SPCC191.13|brf1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.772688049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758863	2538955	2540498	275529	277026	SPCC1450.02	SPBC27.02c	bdf1	ask1	SPCC191.13|brf1	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.843168041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758864	2538955	2543304	275529	279728	SPCC1450.02	SPAC6B12.12	bdf1	tom70	SPCC191.13|brf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.070406677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758865	2538955	2540531	275529	277059	SPCC1450.02	SPBC23E6.08	bdf1	sat1	SPCC191.13|brf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.687392383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758866	2538955	2542418	275529	278881	SPCC1450.02	SPAC1805.07c	bdf1	dad2	SPCC191.13|brf1	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851845792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758867	2538955	2538916	275529	275493	SPCC1450.02	SPCC16C4.17	bdf1	mug123	SPCC191.13|brf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442613382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758868	2538955	2543427	275529	279847	SPCC1450.02	SPAPB1A10.15	bdf1	arv1	SPCC191.13|brf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.197879206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758869	2538955	2543602	275529	280017	SPCC1450.02	SPAPB1A11.04c	bdf1	mca1	SPCC191.13|brf1	SPAPB1A11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.557158901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758870	2538955	2538840	275529	275421	SPCC1450.02	SPCC736.07c	bdf1	SPCC736.07c	SPCC191.13|brf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.488819838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758871	2538955	2542716	275529	279169	SPCC1450.02	SPAC25H1.07	bdf1	emc1	SPCC191.13|brf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.560807741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758872	2538955	2541675	275529	278171	SPCC1450.02	SPAC22F8.12c	bdf1	shf1	SPCC191.13|brf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.277102355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758873	2538955	2543387	275529	279809	SPCC1450.02	SPAPB1E7.02c	bdf1	mcl1	SPCC191.13|brf1	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.365437396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758874	2538955	2538834	275529	275415	SPCC1450.02	SPCC126.08c	bdf1	SPCC126.08c	SPCC191.13|brf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575190249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758875	2538955	2541297	275529	277809	SPCC1450.02	SPBC9B6.07	bdf1	nop52	SPCC191.13|brf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504053593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758876	2538955	2541062	275529	277577	SPCC1450.02	SPBC660.11	bdf1	tcg1	SPCC191.13|brf1	mug187	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.330944178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758877	2538955	2540649	275529	277174	SPCC1450.02	SPBC19F8.08	bdf1	rps401	SPCC191.13|brf1	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.742544382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758878	2539462	2539774	276025	276325	SPCC777.13	SPBC17A3.10	vps35	pas4	-	pi036	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.764027996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758879	2539462	2541902	276025	278392	SPCC777.13	SPAC27E2.07	vps35	pvg2	-	mug53	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.56426296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758880	2539462	2542862	276025	279308	SPCC777.13	SPAC140.03	vps35	arb1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194672873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758881	2539462	2539841	276025	276389	SPCC777.13	SPBC17D1.05	vps35	SPBC17D1.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.717127386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758882	2539462	2541204	276025	277718	SPCC777.13	SPBC839.06	vps35	cta3	-	SPBC24E9.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.41213555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758883	2539462	2541257	276025	277771	SPCC777.13	SPBP23A10.14c	vps35	ell1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.202697791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758884	2539462	2539151	276025	275723	SPCC777.13	SPCC1235.12c	vps35	mug146	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.982950905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758885	2539462	2541763	276025	278257	SPCC777.13	SPAC22F3.11c	vps35	snu23	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714388585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758886	2539462	2542577	276025	279033	SPCC777.13	SPAC19G12.15c	vps35	tpp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153511945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758887	2539462	2542435	276025	278897	SPCC777.13	SPAC1805.16c	vps35	SPAC1805.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.920226235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758888	2539462	2540885	276025	277402	SPCC777.13	SPBC660.14	vps35	mik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.085913274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758889	2539462	2539949	276025	276493	SPCC777.13	SPBC1703.04	vps35	mlh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.627424891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758890	2539462	2542518	276025	278976	SPCC777.13	SPAC1B3.16c	vps35	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.320974926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758891	2539462	2541343	276025	277854	SPCC777.13	SPBPB2B2.19c	vps35	SPBPB2B2.19c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.027283477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758892	2539462	2541426	276025	277931	SPCC777.13	SPAC227.06	vps35	SPAC227.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.32601077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758893	2539462	2539684	276025	276239	SPCC777.13	SPBC16A3.16	vps35	SPBC16A3.16	-	cwc27	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.434916038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758894	2539462	2541399	276025	277908	SPCC777.13	SPBPB10D8.01	vps35	SPBPB10D8.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.803707045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758895	2539462	2542671	276025	279124	SPCC777.13	SPAC824.09c	vps35	SPAC824.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.744956409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758896	2539462	2541032	276025	277547	SPCC777.13	SPBC3H7.11	vps35	SPBC3H7.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.491273213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758897	2539462	2542197	276025	278672	SPCC777.13	SPAC1142.01	vps35	rqc1	-	SPAC1142.01|SPAC17G6.18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935684083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758898	2539462	2543575	276025	279990	SPCC777.13	SPAC644.13c	vps35	SPAC644.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.409615638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758899	2539462	2540994	276025	277510	SPCC777.13	SPBC337.11	vps35	SPBC337.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.507546096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758900	2539462	2542831	276025	279278	SPCC777.13	SPAC20H4.08	vps35	whi2	-	SPAC20H4.08|SPAC145.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.612407152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758901	2539462	2542098	276025	278574	SPCC777.13	SPAC30D11.01c	vps35	gto2	-	SPAC30D11.01c|SPAC56F8.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865395734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758902	2539462	2542502	276025	278960	SPCC777.13	SPAC139.06	vps35	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.975283043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758903	2539462	2540035	276025	276577	SPCC777.13	SPBC16A3.06	vps35	SPBC16A3.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.146220177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758904	2539462	2541066	276025	277581	SPCC777.13	SPBC543.02c	vps35	SPBC543.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205306139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758905	2539462	2543680	276025	280094	SPCC777.13	SPAC4G9.20c	vps35	SPAC4G9.20c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.866390055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758906	2539462	2542614	276025	279068	SPCC777.13	SPAC1399.04c	vps35	SPAC1399.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.54713865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758907	2539462	2542701	276025	279154	SPCC777.13	SPAC26H5.05	vps35	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.426161312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758908	2539462	2538922	276025	275499	SPCC777.13	SPCC16C4.10	vps35	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.826351357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758909	2539462	2541584	276025	278081	SPCC777.13	SPAP32A8.02	vps35	SPAP32A8.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.918157589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758910	2539462	2542103	276025	278579	SPCC777.13	SPAC31G5.11	vps35	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.69480214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758911	2539462	2541082	276025	277597	SPCC777.13	SPBC577.11	vps35	SPBC577.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.232393851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758912	2539462	2540491	276025	277019	SPCC777.13	SPBC28E12.04	vps35	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.797722032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758913	2539462	2538710	276025	275294	SPCC777.13	SPCC1020.12c	vps35	xap5	-	SPCC14G10.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.945546857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758914	2539462	2542892	276025	279336	SPCC777.13	SPAC13F5.04c	vps35	vta1	-	SPAC13F5.04c|new6|SPAC13F5.08|vts1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983732804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758915	2539462	2540535	276025	277062	SPCC777.13	SPBC215.01	vps35	SPBC215.01	-	SPBC3B9.20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.053767373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758916	2539462	2540664	276025	277189	SPCC777.13	SPBC215.02	vps35	bob1	-	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196480868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758917	2539462	2538806	276025	275387	SPCC777.13	SPCC1840.09	vps35	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.408604226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758918	2539462	2543320	276025	279744	SPCC777.13	SPAPJ695.01c	vps35	SPAPJ695.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.147199519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758919	2539462	2541891	276025	278381	SPCC777.13	SPAC1F8.03c	vps35	str3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380911996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758920	2539462	2543098	276025	279530	SPCC777.13	SPAC4A8.06c	vps35	SPAC4A8.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.839758662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758921	2539462	2541086	276025	277601	SPCC777.13	SPBC685.04c	vps35	aps2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.561216105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758922	2539462	2542035	276025	278517	SPCC777.13	SPAP8A3.04c	vps35	hsp9	-	scf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.835614962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758923	2539462	2542107	276025	278583	SPCC777.13	SPAC30.01c	vps35	sec72	-	sec7b|sec702	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.061169545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758924	2539462	2541205	276025	277719	SPCC777.13	SPBC839.02	vps35	SPBC839.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.173741958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758925	2539462	2538847	276025	275428	SPCC777.13	SPCC594.06c	vps35	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.26596218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758926	2539462	2542816	276025	279263	SPCC777.13	SPAC4G8.11c	vps35	atp10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.645702539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758927	2539462	2543230	276025	279658	SPCC777.13	SPAC823.13c	vps35	SPAC823.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326274882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758928	2539462	2543590	276025	280005	SPCC777.13	SPAC4C5.03	vps35	SPAC4C5.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.01690555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758929	2539462	2541046	276025	277561	SPCC777.13	SPBC365.01	vps35	crs103	-	SPBC365.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.309055868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758930	2539462	2543383	276025	279805	SPCC777.13	SPAC869.08	vps35	pcm2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382468164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758931	2539462	2543453	276025	279873	SPCC777.13	SPAC3G9.03	vps35	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.075123257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758932	2539462	2540692	276025	277217	SPCC777.13	SPBC800.07c	vps35	tsf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.258584994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758933	2539462	2542555	276025	279012	SPCC777.13	SPAC1952.06c	vps35	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.55699003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758934	2539462	2540220	276025	276753	SPCC777.13	SPBC337.03	vps35	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.178527339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758935	2539462	2543053	276025	279487	SPCC777.13	SPAC10F6.15	vps35	SPAC10F6.15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262182526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758936	2539462	2541541	276025	278041	SPCC777.13	SPAC1F7.11c	vps35	SPAC1F7.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.336245079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758937	2539462	2540698	276025	277222	SPCC777.13	SPBC215.11c	vps35	SPBC215.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.512008203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758938	2539462	2539575	276025	276135	SPCC777.13	SPCP20C8.02c	vps35	SPCP20C8.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.564297909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758939	2539462	2543048	276025	279483	SPCC777.13	SPAC3F10.02c	vps35	trk1	-	sptrk	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.850527677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758940	2539462	2541119	276025	277634	SPCC777.13	SPBC651.11c	vps35	apm3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.014437378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758941	2539462	2541045	276025	277560	SPCC777.13	SPBC543.03c	vps35	pku80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775398785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758942	2539462	2539302	276025	275870	SPCC777.13	SPCC126.09	vps35	zip2	-	SPCC126.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.747601191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758943	2539462	2541227	276025	277741	SPCC777.13	SPBC947.05c	vps35	frp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.868671551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758944	2539462	2540425	276025	276953	SPCC777.13	SPBC27.06c	vps35	mgr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145068367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758945	2539462	2541527	276025	278027	SPCC777.13	SPAC31A2.09c	vps35	apm4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.867119737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758946	2539462	2539792	276025	276342	SPCC777.13	SPBC1271.14	vps35	SPBC1271.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.26218485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758947	2539462	2540467	276025	276995	SPCC777.13	SPBC2G2.07c	vps35	mug178	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.854330453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758948	2539462	2539057	276025	275630	SPCC777.13	SPCC70.04c	vps35	SPCC70.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781936781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758949	2539462	2540851	276025	277368	SPCC777.13	SPBC4F6.04	vps35	rpl2502	-	rpl23a-2|rpl25b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.750448691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758950	2539462	2540595	276025	277121	SPCC777.13	SPBC21C3.02c	vps35	dep1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.851374217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758951	2539462	2541428	276025	277933	SPCC777.13	SPAC14C4.11	vps35	SPAC14C4.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.120992363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758952	2539462	2540663	276025	277188	SPCC777.13	SPBC56F2.06	vps35	mug147	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3211473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758953	2539462	2540127	276025	276664	SPCC777.13	SPBC106.20	vps35	exo70	-	SPBC582.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.848005794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758954	2539462	2540059	276025	276597	SPCC777.13	SPBC1198.01	vps35	fmd2	-	SPBC1198.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.596575676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758955	2539462	2543563	276025	279979	SPCC777.13	SPAC664.02c	vps35	arp8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.620124613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758956	2539462	2542082	276025	278559	SPCC777.13	SPAC29B12.10c	vps35	pgt1	-	opt1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.982868784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758957	2539462	2539197	276025	275768	SPCC777.13	SPCC24B10.14c	vps35	xlf1	-	mug104|nej1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.91056687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758958	2539462	2543426	276025	279846	SPCC777.13	SPAC631.02	vps35	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.005959912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758959	2539462	2540415	276025	276943	SPCC777.13	SPBC30B4.06c	vps35	SPBC30B4.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.405601279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758960	2539462	2543319	276025	279743	SPCC777.13	SPAC6B12.09	vps35	trm10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153381422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758961	2539462	2541663	276025	278159	SPCC777.13	SPAC22G7.08	vps35	ppk8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.644939605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758962	2539462	2542253	276025	278723	SPCC777.13	SPAC17H9.04c	vps35	SPAC17H9.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.722312105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758963	2539462	2542558	276025	279014	SPCC777.13	SPAC1952.07	vps35	rad1	-	rad19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042778741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758964	2539462	2540303	276025	276833	SPCC777.13	SPBC354.01	vps35	gtp1	-	SPBC649.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.054791791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758965	2539462	2539448	276025	276011	SPCC777.13	SPCC825.04c	vps35	naa40	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714393355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758966	2539462	2543573	276025	279988	SPCC777.13	SPAC869.11	vps35	cat1	-	SPAC922.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.363602133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758967	2539462	2542036	276025	278518	SPCC777.13	SPAC23A1.19c	vps35	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923390244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758968	2539462	2539237	276025	275807	SPCC777.13	SPCC24B10.13	vps35	skb5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.687989661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758969	2539462	2541938	276025	278425	SPCC777.13	SPAC8C9.16c	vps35	mug63	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.414226798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758970	2539462	3361461	276025	280537	SPCC777.13	SPAC11H11.01	vps35	sst6	-	cps23	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.789600259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758971	2539462	2539339	276025	275905	SPCC777.13	SPCC1494.03	vps35	arz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.414882651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758972	2539462	2542950	276025	279390	SPCC777.13	SPAC12B10.03	vps35	bun62	-	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77411641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758973	2539462	2542177	276025	278652	SPCC777.13	SPAC17H9.08	vps35	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981921821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758974	2539462	2539355	276025	275921	SPCC777.13	SPCC1840.08c	vps35	pdi5	-	SPCC1840.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.536598811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758975	2539462	2540631	276025	277157	SPCC777.13	SPBC25B2.10	vps35	SPBC25B2.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.740402131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758976	2539462	2542499	276025	278958	SPCC777.13	SPAC1F12.04c	vps35	SPAC1F12.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.720828848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758977	2539462	2543375	276025	279797	SPCC777.13	SPAC3H1.08c	vps35	SPAC3H1.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989366631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758978	2539462	2541615	276025	278112	SPCC777.13	SPAC27D7.11c	vps35	SPAC27D7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.922918911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758979	2539462	2540241	276025	276773	SPCC777.13	SPBC32H8.11	vps35	mei4	-	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043160861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758980	2539462	2541784	276025	278277	SPCC777.13	SPAC2E1P3.01	vps35	SPAC2E1P3.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.251532563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758981	2539462	2543598	276025	280013	SPCC777.13	SPAC4G9.14	vps35	SPAC4G9.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707943264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758982	2539462	2543144	276025	279576	SPCC777.13	SPAC3F10.05c	vps35	mug113	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.134822126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758983	2539462	2543593	276025	280008	SPCC777.13	SPAC4G9.10	vps35	arg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.3456557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758984	2539462	2543445	276025	279865	SPCC777.13	SPAC4F10.13c	vps35	mpd2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319427934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758985	2539462	2540647	276025	277172	SPCC777.13	SPBC18H10.07	vps35	SPBC18H10.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143786911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758986	2539462	2542463	276025	278924	SPCC777.13	SPAC1834.03c	vps35	hhf1	-	h4.1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.721978552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758987	2539462	2543272	276025	279700	SPCC777.13	SPAC1002.07c	vps35	ats1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.251787836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758988	2539462	2540987	276025	277503	SPCC777.13	SPBC36B7.05c	vps35	SPBC36B7.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.630441447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758989	2539462	2542699	276025	279152	SPCC777.13	SPAC5H10.07	vps35	SPAC5H10.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.712224824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758990	2539462	2542971	276025	279410	SPCC777.13	SPAC105.02c	vps35	SPAC105.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.842024967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758991	2539462	2542543	276025	279000	SPCC777.13	SPAC30D11.11	vps35	SPAC30D11.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.251352339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758992	2539462	2540363	276025	276892	SPCC777.13	SPBC2F12.09c	vps35	atf21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.330494485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758993	2539462	2539898	276025	276444	SPCC777.13	SPBC12D12.07c	vps35	trx2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.953112003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758994	2539462	2540886	276025	277403	SPCC777.13	SPBC4F6.10	vps35	vps901	-	vps9a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.382763557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758995	2539462	2539219	276025	275789	SPCC777.13	SPCC1795.01c	vps35	mad3	-	SPCC895.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.227142576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758996	2539462	2542989	276025	279427	SPCC777.13	SPAC11E3.13c	vps35	gas5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.309070261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758997	2539462	2541876	276025	278366	SPCC777.13	SPAP27G11.11c	vps35	SPAP27G11.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.752862306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758998	2539462	2542469	276025	278930	SPCC777.13	SPAC19A8.04	vps35	erg5	-	cyp61	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.925917708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
758999	2539462	2542522	276025	278980	SPCC777.13	SPAC19A8.03	vps35	ymr1	-	SPAC19A8.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.986283876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759000	2539462	2540418	276025	276946	SPCC777.13	SPBC27.05	vps35	SPBC27.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379515803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759001	2539462	2539689	276025	276244	SPCC777.13	SPBC1861.03	vps35	mak10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.878093588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759002	2539462	2541929	276025	278417	SPCC777.13	SPAC23C4.12	vps35	hhp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869280574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759003	2539462	2541413	276025	277921	SPCC777.13	SPBPJ4664.06	vps35	gpt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387535562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759004	2539462	2542651	276025	279105	SPCC777.13	SPAC24C9.12c	vps35	SPAC24C9.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.84702998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759005	2539462	2543643	276025	280057	SPCC777.13	SPAC3G9.07c	vps35	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2080696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759006	2539462	2539233	276025	275803	SPCC777.13	SPCC16A11.03c	vps35	SPCC16A11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.80500782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759007	2539462	2543250	276025	279678	SPCC777.13	SPAC3G9.15c	vps35	fcf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.791961265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759008	2539462	2538958	276025	275532	SPCC777.13	SPCC24B10.20	vps35	SPCC24B10.20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.012971724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759009	2539462	2541983	276025	278468	SPCC777.13	SPAC20G8.08c	vps35	fft1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.275340191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759010	2539462	2543406	276025	279828	SPCC777.13	SPAC9.12c	vps35	atp12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.853717825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759011	2539462	2542409	276025	278873	SPCC777.13	SPAC17G8.10c	vps35	dma1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.557551527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759012	2539462	2538769	276025	275352	SPCC777.13	SPCC126.04c	vps35	sgf73	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.406501011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759013	2539462	2539667	276025	276222	SPCC777.13	SPBC13G1.08c	vps35	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.542005845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759014	2539462	2542528	276025	278986	SPCC777.13	SPAC1B3.08	vps35	SPAC1B3.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.973455953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759015	2539462	2540665	276025	277190	SPCC777.13	SPBC83.02c	vps35	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.124311733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759016	2539462	2540430	276025	276958	SPCC777.13	SPBC25B2.01	vps35	SPBC25B2.01	-	SPBC2G5.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852666498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759017	2539462	2541828	276025	278319	SPCC777.13	SPAC22H12.05c	vps35	fsc1	-	SPAC22H12.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196332927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759018	2539462	2543178	276025	279608	SPCC777.13	SPAC31G5.15	vps35	psd3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149878905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759019	2539462	2538880	276025	275459	SPCC777.13	SPCC1393.09c	vps35	SPCC1393.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148566716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759020	2539462	2541720	276025	278214	SPCC777.13	SPAC23H3.13c	vps35	gpa2	-	git8	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869182991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759021	2539462	2540394	276025	276922	SPCC777.13	SPBC2D10.09	vps35	snr1	-	SPBC2D10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.267624046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759022	2539462	2541248	276025	277762	SPCC777.13	SPBC8D2.10c	vps35	rmt3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.074716795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759023	2539462	2541882	276025	278372	SPCC777.13	SPAC2F7.09c	vps35	SPAC2F7.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.130233588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759024	2539462	2538935	276025	275511	SPCC777.13	SPCC1682.11c	vps35	ctl1	-	SPCC1682.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.266249823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759025	2539462	2538723	276025	275307	SPCC777.13	SPCC31H12.06	vps35	mug111	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.005014505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759026	2539462	2542254	276025	278724	SPCC777.13	SPAC30D11.04c	vps35	nup124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503449604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759027	2539462	2542612	276025	279066	SPCC777.13	SPACUNK4.15	vps35	SPACUNK4.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771368571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759028	2539462	2542867	276025	279312	SPCC777.13	SPAC343.16	vps35	lys2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.125365031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759029	2539462	2540374	276025	276903	SPCC777.13	SPBC31F10.02	vps35	SPBC31F10.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.409973354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759030	2539462	2540318	276025	276848	SPCC777.13	SPBC30B4.04c	vps35	sol1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.345029859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759031	2539462	5802861	276025	857999	SPCC777.13	SPAC1D4.01	vps35	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.688920804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759032	2539462	2542919	276025	279360	SPCC777.13	SPAC6C3.08	vps35	nas6	-	SPAC6C3.08	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200057224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759033	2539462	2543683	276025	280097	SPCC777.13	SPAPB1E7.04c	vps35	SPAPB1E7.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702436175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759034	2539462	2542437	276025	278899	SPCC777.13	SPAC17A5.01	vps35	pex6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.721994999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759035	2539462	2542439	276025	278901	SPCC777.13	SPAC17A5.08	vps35	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981899793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759036	2539462	2539376	276025	275942	SPCC777.13	SPCC5E4.10c	vps35	SPCC5E4.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331674889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759037	2539462	2541041	276025	277556	SPCC777.13	SPBC3D6.13c	vps35	pdi3	-	pdi2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.686863023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759038	2539462	2539368	276025	275934	SPCC777.13	SPCC16A11.07	vps35	coq10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.893309902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759039	2539462	2542720	276025	279171	SPCC777.13	SPAC25G10.05c	vps35	his1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.772019731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759040	2539462	2540201	276025	276734	SPCC777.13	SPBC13A2.04c	vps35	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.684098164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759041	2539462	2541961	276025	278448	SPCC777.13	SPAC23C4.02	vps35	crn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.127472122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759042	2539462	2541959	276025	278446	SPCC777.13	SPAC23C4.03	vps35	hrk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.203002406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759043	2539462	2540967	276025	277483	SPCC777.13	SPBC36B7.08c	vps35	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810116866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759044	2539462	2542597	276025	279051	SPCC777.13	SPAP8A3.07c	vps35	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.208307035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759045	2539462	2541479	276025	277981	SPCC777.13	SPAC27F1.06c	vps35	SPAC27F1.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.144050224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759046	2539462	2543331	276025	279754	SPCC777.13	SPAC56E4.07	vps35	SPAC56E4.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.151321578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759047	2539462	2540533	276025	277061	SPCC777.13	SPBC29A10.16c	vps35	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.51683727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759048	2539462	3361030	276025	280106	SPCC777.13	SPCP20C8.03	vps35	SPCP20C8.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514953349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759049	2539462	2542550	276025	279007	SPCC777.13	SPAC1B3.02c	vps35	SPAC1B3.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868527255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759050	2539462	2538884	276025	275462	SPCC777.13	SPCC1393.08	vps35	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.042484047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759051	2539462	2542829	276025	279276	SPCC777.13	SPAC13D6.02c	vps35	byr3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.184775933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759052	2539462	2543477	276025	279897	SPCC777.13	SPAPB2B4.04c	vps35	SPAPB2B4.04c	-	pmc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.793340615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759053	2539462	2539605	276025	276163	SPCC777.13	SPBC1105.13c	vps35	SPBC1105.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.616339891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759054	2539462	2542781	276025	279230	SPCC777.13	SPAC57A10.12c	vps35	ura3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.77161437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759055	2539462	2540926	276025	277442	SPCC777.13	SPBC359.06	vps35	mug14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.806229813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759056	2539462	2540930	276025	277446	SPCC777.13	SPBC354.10	vps35	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.097578483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759057	2539462	2541742	276025	278236	SPCC777.13	SPAC22H10.09	vps35	SPAC22H10.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.793270717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759058	2539462	2541963	276025	278449	SPCC777.13	SPAC21E11.04	vps35	aca1	-	ppr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462015336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759059	2539462	3361520	276025	280596	SPCC777.13	SPAC1610.02c	vps35	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.100878299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759060	2539462	2541144	276025	277659	SPCC777.13	SPBC685.06	vps35	rps001	-	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101366048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759061	2539462	2543493	276025	279913	SPCC777.13	SPAC4G8.08	vps35	SPAC4G8.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036547313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759062	2539462	2541713	276025	278208	SPCC777.13	SPAC3A12.12	vps35	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.964241059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759063	2539462	2540001	276025	276545	SPCC777.13	SPBC1289.13c	vps35	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.047135807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759064	2539462	2539631	276025	276187	SPCC777.13	SPBC16G5.16	vps35	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513302373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759065	2539462	2542283	276025	278751	SPCC777.13	SPAC27F1.08	vps35	pdt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.84862312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759066	2539462	2540701	276025	277225	SPCC777.13	SPBC19C7.08c	vps35	SPBC19C7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978336018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759067	2539462	2540706	276025	277229	SPCC777.13	SPBC19C7.12c	vps35	omh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.330444822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759068	2539462	2543391	276025	279813	SPCC777.13	SPAC4G9.09c	vps35	arg11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.133385626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759069	2539462	2540442	276025	276970	SPCC777.13	SPBC25B2.04c	vps35	mtg1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.391542323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759070	2539462	2541156	276025	277671	SPCC777.13	SPBC685.07c	vps35	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.772540952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759071	2539462	2538762	276025	275345	SPCC777.13	SPCC306.04c	vps35	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.767237947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759072	2539462	2542619	276025	279073	SPCC777.13	SPAC6G10.02c	vps35	tea3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048943091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759073	2539462	2539082	276025	275654	SPCC777.13	SPCC126.03	vps35	pus1	-	lps1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.919717033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759074	2539462	2540809	276025	277328	SPCC777.13	SPBC18A7.01	vps35	SPBC18A7.01	-	SPBC4F6.19c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.563273286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759075	2539462	2540605	276025	277131	SPCC777.13	SPBC21C3.09c	vps35	SPBC21C3.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.620135406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759076	2539462	2543670	276025	280084	SPCC777.13	SPAPB1E7.06c	vps35	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152471997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759077	2539462	2541931	276025	278419	SPCC777.13	SPAC6G9.16c	vps35	SPAC6G9.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567374551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759078	2539462	2542883	276025	279328	SPCC777.13	SPAC1486.04c	vps35	alm1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.917404653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759079	2539462	2542915	276025	279357	SPCC777.13	SPAC6C3.06c	vps35	SPAC6C3.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.195244463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759080	2539462	2539925	276025	276469	SPCC777.13	SPBC16H5.13	vps35	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05136531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759081	2539462	2542515	276025	278973	SPCC777.13	SPAC1952.09c	vps35	SPAC1952.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.866357676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759082	2539462	2542621	276025	279075	SPCC777.13	SPAC5H10.05c	vps35	SPAC5H10.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.630564773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759083	2539462	2540152	276025	276688	SPCC777.13	SPBC12C2.03c	vps35	SPBC12C2.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.822056266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759084	2539462	2540881	276025	277398	SPCC777.13	SPBC577.14c	vps35	spa1	-	spa	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450229319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759085	2539462	2539159	276025	275731	SPCC777.13	SPCC1235.01	vps35	SPCC1235.01	-	SPCC320.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.564388904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759086	2539462	2542075	276025	278552	SPCC777.13	SPAC27D7.06	vps35	etf1	-	SPAC27D7.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.662285922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759087	2539462	2540089	276025	276627	SPCC777.13	SPBC32H8.01c	vps35	SPBC32H8.01c	-	SPBP22H7.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870606583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759088	2539462	2543662	276025	280076	SPCC777.13	SPAC9.07c	vps35	SPAC9.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819342715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759089	2539462	2540758	276025	277279	SPCC777.13	SPBC19C2.10	vps35	SPBC19C2.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.471503098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759090	2539462	2540725	276025	277248	SPCC777.13	SPBC215.14c	vps35	vps20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.816989792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759091	2539462	2538756	276025	275339	SPCC777.13	SPCC1795.10c	vps35	SPCC1795.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.562103237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759092	2539462	2539816	276025	276366	SPCC777.13	SPBC12C2.04	vps35	SPBC12C2.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.263642376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759093	2539462	2540304	276025	276834	SPCC777.13	SPBC354.13	vps35	rga6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.466927732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759094	2539462	2540699	276025	277223	SPCC777.13	SPBC800.08	vps35	gcd10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039972316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759095	2539462	2540000	276025	276544	SPCC777.13	SPBC1683.13c	vps35	cha4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.414675989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759096	2539462	2540325	276025	276855	SPCC777.13	SPBC21B10.10	vps35	rps402	-	rps4-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.258516443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759097	2539462	2539318	276025	275884	SPCC777.13	SPCC1919.07	vps35	SPCC1919.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189589195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759098	2539462	3361329	276025	280405	SPCC777.13	SPBC25H2.10c	vps35	SPBC25H2.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992534999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759099	2539462	2539729	276025	276281	SPCC777.13	SPBC11B10.07c	vps35	ivn1	-	pi004|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.048357662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759100	2539462	2539722	276025	276275	SPCC777.13	SPBC14F5.11c	vps35	mug186	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.672355986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759101	2539462	2542222	276025	278695	SPCC777.13	SPAC31G5.18c	vps35	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.016184233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759102	2539462	2543437	276025	279857	SPCC777.13	SPAPB1A10.14	vps35	pof15	-	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44325773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759103	2539462	2543427	276025	279847	SPCC777.13	SPAPB1A10.15	vps35	arv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.052660865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759104	2539462	2539188	276025	275759	SPCC777.13	SPCC1827.04	vps35	vms1	-	SPCC1827.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.883955544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759105	2539462	2542826	276025	279273	SPCC777.13	SPAC13G6.09	vps35	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.46094735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759106	2539462	2540569	276025	277096	SPCC777.13	SPBC660.17c	vps35	SPBC660.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.766951677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759107	2539462	2542878	276025	279323	SPCC777.13	SPAC57A10.09c	vps35	nhp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.411767551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759108	2539462	2541789	276025	278281	SPCC777.13	SPAC23H4.08	vps35	iwr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.383305648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759109	2539462	2543183	276025	279612	SPCC777.13	SPAC3A12.06c	vps35	SPAC3A12.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.747509325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759110	2539462	2539251	276025	275821	SPCC777.13	SPCC24B10.02c	vps35	SPCC24B10.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.91643359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759111	2539462	2540927	276025	277443	SPCC777.13	SPBC365.06	vps35	pmt3	-	smt3|ubl2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.259535104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759112	2539462	2541115	276025	277630	SPCC777.13	SPBC660.07	vps35	ntp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.917761848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759113	2539462	2543046	276025	279481	SPCC777.13	SPAC3C7.10	vps35	pex13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.984444573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759114	2539462	2543044	276025	279479	SPCC777.13	SPAC3C7.12	vps35	tip1	-	noc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983684843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759115	2539462	2539736	276025	276288	SPCC777.13	SPBC12C2.12c	vps35	glo1	-	SPBC21D10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.71043923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759116	2539462	2542353	276025	278818	SPCC777.13	SPAC57A10.07	vps35	SPAC57A10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378007361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759117	2539462	2540563	276025	277090	SPCC777.13	SPBC25H2.09	vps35	SPBC25H2.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.645653713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759118	2539462	2539726	276025	276278	SPCC777.13	SPBC13E7.08c	vps35	leo1	-	SPBC13E7.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.227808386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759119	2539462	2542607	276025	279061	SPCC777.13	SPAC18B11.02c	vps35	SPAC18B11.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.568773379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759120	2539462	2542904	276025	279348	SPCC777.13	SPAC144.11	vps35	rps1102	-	rps11|rps11-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317343521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759121	2539462	2539920	276025	276464	SPCC777.13	SPBC119.08	vps35	pmk1	-	spm1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.385935651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759122	2539462	2543124	276025	279556	SPCC777.13	SPAC3A11.06	vps35	mvp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.869592711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759123	2539462	2540551	276025	277078	SPCC777.13	SPBC23E6.01c	vps35	cxr1	-	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.958399145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759124	2539462	2538840	276025	275421	SPCC777.13	SPCC736.07c	vps35	SPCC736.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.902159026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759125	2539462	2542021	276025	278504	SPCC777.13	SPAP14E8.02	vps35	tos4	-	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.518011275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759126	2539462	2543486	276025	279906	SPCC777.13	SPAC959.07	vps35	rps403	-	rps4|rps4-3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324461693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759127	2539462	2542059	276025	278537	SPCC777.13	SPAC328.06	vps35	ubp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632732124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759128	2539462	2539253	276025	275823	SPCC777.13	SPCC1827.03c	vps35	SPCC1827.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.021466518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759129	2539462	3361410	276025	280486	SPCC777.13	SPAC1527.01	vps35	mok11	-	SPAC23D3.15	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.180447967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759130	2539462	2543370	276025	279792	SPCC777.13	SPAC630.07c	vps35	SPAC630.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.450659482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759131	2539462	2543379	276025	279801	SPCC777.13	SPAC821.09	vps35	eng1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.765593942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759132	2539462	2543384	276025	279806	SPCC777.13	SPAC637.06	vps35	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.196472643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759133	2539462	2541774	276025	278268	SPCC777.13	SPAC22E12.05c	vps35	rer1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.829292738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759134	2539462	2540828	276025	277346	SPCC777.13	SPBC4B4.06	vps35	vps25	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.903774216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759135	2539462	2541003	276025	277518	SPCC777.13	SPBC3E7.16c	vps35	leu3	-	SPBC4F6.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.155083395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759136	2539462	2539743	276025	276295	SPCC777.13	SPBC16A3.08c	vps35	oga1	-	SPBC16A3.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.561000411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759137	2539462	2542399	276025	278863	SPCC777.13	SPAC1805.10	vps35	SPAC1805.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.919748262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759138	2539462	2542104	276025	278580	SPCC777.13	SPAC869.02c	vps35	SPAC869.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.91690972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759139	2539462	2541867	276025	278357	SPCC777.13	SPAC22E12.14c	vps35	sck2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.513033532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759140	2539462	2541502	276025	278004	SPCC777.13	SPAC23D3.04c	vps35	gpd2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.611881896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759141	2539462	2541478	276025	277980	SPCC777.13	SPAC2F7.17	vps35	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.763053373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759142	2539462	2540372	276025	276901	SPCC777.13	SPBC31F10.03	vps35	SPBC31F10.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195329206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759143	2539462	2542890	276025	279334	SPCC777.13	SPAC13G6.14	vps35	aps1	-	SPAC24B11.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808011848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759144	2539462	2540859	276025	277376	SPCC777.13	SPBC4C3.09	vps35	SPBC4C3.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.265169274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759145	2539462	2543100	276025	279532	SPCC777.13	SPAC12B10.14c	vps35	tea5	-	ppk2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.280197284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759146	2539462	2538696	276025	275281	SPCC777.13	SPCC569.06	vps35	SPCC569.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448518086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759147	2539462	2541124	276025	277639	SPCC777.13	SPBC646.02	vps35	cwf11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.508285155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759148	2539462	2542561	276025	279017	SPCC777.13	SPAC31G5.17c	vps35	rps1001	-	rps10-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929401668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759149	2539462	2542594	276025	279048	SPCC777.13	SPACUNK4.10	vps35	SPACUNK4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636265584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759150	2539462	2543646	276025	280060	SPCC777.13	SPAC821.07c	vps35	moc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.836869475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759151	2539462	2540208	276025	276741	SPCC777.13	SPBC9B6.03	vps35	SPBC9B6.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.635565653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759152	2539462	2540310	276025	276840	SPCC777.13	SPBC29B5.04c	vps35	SPBC29B5.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.263350865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759153	2539462	3361512	276025	280588	SPCC777.13	SPAC3C7.01c	vps35	sac12	-	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.03801949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759154	2539462	2538940	276025	275515	SPCC777.13	SPCC1620.07c	vps35	lnp1	-	SPCC1620.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.98362247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759155	2539462	2540798	276025	277317	SPCC777.13	SPBC19C7.01	vps35	mni1	-	SPBC32F12.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.186666679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759156	2539462	2540734	276025	277257	SPCC777.13	SPBC19G7.09	vps35	ulp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.47804537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759157	2539462	2542578	276025	279034	SPCC777.13	SPAC18B11.09c	vps35	SPAC18B11.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576531761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759158	2539462	2540736	276025	277259	SPCC777.13	SPBC19F8.02	vps35	SPBC19F8.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.977997208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759159	2541044	2542072	277559	278549	SPBC354.05c	SPAP32A8.03c	sre2	bop1	-	SPAP32A8.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.710577467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759160	2541044	2540279	277559	276810	SPBC354.05c	SPBC3B8.04c	sre2	SPBC3B8.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.630064948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759161	2541044	2539034	277559	275607	SPBC354.05c	SPCC830.10	sre2	ham1	-	SPCC830.10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.3195402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759162	2541044	2541475	277559	277977	SPBC354.05c	SPAC24B11.09	sre2	mpc2	-	SPAC24B11.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.33743719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759163	2541044	2538961	277559	275535	SPBC354.05c	SPCC285.14	sre2	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.890243622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759164	2541044	2542577	277559	279033	SPBC354.05c	SPAC19G12.15c	sre2	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453069752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759165	2541044	2540913	277559	277429	SPBC354.05c	SPBC56F2.08c	sre2	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444070294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759166	2541044	2541552	277559	278051	SPBC354.05c	SPAC1142.08	sre2	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.332158079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759167	2541044	2540995	277559	277511	SPBC354.05c	SPBC337.16	sre2	cho1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.246425307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759168	2541044	2538993	277559	275567	SPBC354.05c	SPCC162.12	sre2	tco89	-	SPCC1753.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.188137883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759169	2541044	2542831	277559	279278	SPBC354.05c	SPAC20H4.08	sre2	whi2	-	SPAC20H4.08|SPAC145.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510179824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759170	2541044	5802945	277559	858083	SPBC354.05c	SPAC19G12.16c	sre2	adg2	-	SPAC23A1.01c|mug46	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.072410957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759171	2541044	2542614	277559	279068	SPBC354.05c	SPAC1399.04c	sre2	SPAC1399.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.680723266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759172	2541044	2542103	277559	278579	SPBC354.05c	SPAC31G5.11	sre2	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709769194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759173	2541044	2539420	277559	275985	SPBC354.05c	SPCC970.07c	sre2	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.991100427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759174	2541044	2542563	277559	279019	SPBC354.05c	SPAC1952.11c	sre2	ure2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.316380983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759175	2541044	2542273	277559	278742	SPBC354.05c	SPAC17H9.13c	sre2	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645156607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759176	2541044	2543316	277559	279740	SPBC354.05c	SPAPJ691.02	sre2	SPAPJ691.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504851476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759177	2541044	2539249	277559	275819	SPBC354.05c	SPCC1450.05c	sre2	rox3	-	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.784263973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759178	2541044	2543453	277559	279873	SPBC354.05c	SPAC3G9.03	sre2	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.889339942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759179	2541044	2539937	277559	276481	SPBC354.05c	SPBC1539.08	sre2	arf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509058469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759180	2541044	2539302	277559	275870	SPBC354.05c	SPCC126.09	sre2	zip2	-	SPCC126.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38829858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759181	2541044	2540714	277559	277237	SPBC354.05c	SPBC19C2.04c	sre2	ubp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325414824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759182	2541044	2539100	277559	275672	SPBC354.05c	SPCC330.12c	sre2	sdh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.833744508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759183	2541044	2539310	277559	275877	SPBC354.05c	SPCC285.17	sre2	spp27	-	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.824465891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759184	2541044	2542554	277559	279011	SPBC354.05c	SPAC1952.03	sre2	otu2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.29394391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759185	2541044	2543514	277559	279932	SPBC354.05c	SPAC4D7.03	sre2	pop2	-	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.312904969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759186	2541044	2540192	277559	276725	SPBC354.05c	SPBC1215.01	sre2	shy1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.97833673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759187	2541044	2543593	277559	280008	SPBC354.05c	SPAC4G9.10	sre2	arg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.383749011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759188	2541044	2541545	277559	278045	SPBC354.05c	SPAC22F8.07c	sre2	rtf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.618630054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759189	2541044	2540647	277559	277172	SPBC354.05c	SPBC18H10.07	sre2	SPBC18H10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.589543709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759190	2541044	2539046	277559	275619	SPBC354.05c	SPCC1223.12c	sre2	meu10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637900856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759191	2541044	2542168	277559	278643	SPBC354.05c	SPAC17A5.16	sre2	ftp105	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.625698887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759192	2541044	2539484	277559	276047	SPBC354.05c	SPCC594.04c	sre2	SPCC594.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.853481679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759193	2541044	2541183	277559	277697	SPBC354.05c	SPBC725.14	sre2	arg6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.054158409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759194	2541044	2540665	277559	277190	SPBC354.05c	SPBC83.02c	sre2	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.847817005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759195	2541044	2541720	277559	278214	SPBC354.05c	SPAC23H3.13c	sre2	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582897668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759196	2541044	2543495	277559	279914	SPBC354.05c	SPAC513.03	sre2	mfm2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383472162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759197	2541044	2538841	277559	275422	SPBC354.05c	SPCC550.03c	sre2	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.325155921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759198	2541044	2539958	277559	276502	SPBC354.05c	SPBC1718.07c	sre2	zfs1	-	moc4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.211954264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759199	2541044	2543301	277559	279726	SPBC354.05c	SPAC977.17	sre2	SPAC977.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.315685847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759200	2541044	2542056	277559	278535	SPBC354.05c	SPAC6G9.14	sre2	SPAC6G9.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.936964505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759201	2541044	2542597	277559	279051	SPBC354.05c	SPAP8A3.07c	sre2	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706167819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759202	2541044	2539427	277559	275992	SPBC354.05c	SPCC663.15c	sre2	SPCC663.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439245065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759203	2541044	2538848	277559	275429	SPBC354.05c	SPCC613.12c	sre2	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.398938926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759204	2541044	2541144	277559	277659	SPBC354.05c	SPBC685.06	sre2	rps001	-	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.654596005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759205	2541044	2541156	277559	277671	SPBC354.05c	SPBC685.07c	sre2	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05401453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759206	2541044	2542759	277559	279209	SPBC354.05c	SPAC9G1.07	sre2	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507250005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759207	2541044	2543051	277559	279486	SPBC354.05c	SPAC1071.08	sre2	rpp203	-	rla6|rpp2-3|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387953886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759208	2541044	2542767	277559	279217	SPBC354.05c	SPAC1565.07c	sre2	knd1	-	SPAC1565.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.084492624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759209	2541044	2543670	277559	280084	SPBC354.05c	SPAPB1E7.06c	sre2	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320917446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759210	2541044	2541909	277559	278399	SPBC354.05c	SPAC227.01c	sre2	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.251985954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759211	2541044	2541931	277559	278419	SPBC354.05c	SPAC6G9.16c	sre2	SPAC6G9.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.313544373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759212	2541044	2543674	277559	280088	SPBC354.05c	SPAC637.13c	sre2	slm1	-	SPAC637.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387673117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759213	2541044	2542541	277559	278998	SPBC354.05c	SPAC1B3.03c	sre2	wis2	-	cyp5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503150631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759214	2541044	2540733	277559	277256	SPBC354.05c	SPBC4.01	sre2	dni2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.982513625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759215	2541044	2539239	277559	275809	SPBC354.05c	SPCC1020.10	sre2	oca2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.498221875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759216	2541044	2539013	277559	275586	SPBC354.05c	SPCC364.03	sre2	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.315295518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759217	2541044	2541678	277559	278174	SPBC354.05c	SPAP7G5.05	sre2	rpl1002	-	rpl10|rpl10-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.011654004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759218	2541044	2540677	277559	277202	SPBC354.05c	SPBC21B10.03c	sre2	ath1	-	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.965949264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759219	2541044	2540146	277559	276683	SPBC354.05c	SPBC17A3.06	sre2	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.522505679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759220	2541044	2538792	277559	275373	SPBC354.05c	SPCP1E11.10	sre2	SPCP1E11.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.999303636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759221	2541044	2541645	277559	278141	SPBC354.05c	SPAC1527.03	sre2	SPAC1527.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770384632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759222	2541044	2539169	277559	275740	SPBC354.05c	SPCC1235.11	sre2	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.323081277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759223	2541044	2541357	277559	277868	SPBC354.05c	SPBPB7E8.01	sre2	SPBPB7E8.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.919886292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759224	2541044	2541806	277559	278297	SPBC354.05c	SPAC4G8.13c	sre2	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.484742683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759225	2541044	2543327	277559	279750	SPBC354.05c	SPAC1D4.06c	sre2	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.759881064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759226	2541044	2541627	277559	278123	SPBC354.05c	SPAC1F5.08c	sre2	yam8	-	ehs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.430796701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759227	2541044	2539128	277559	275700	SPBC354.05c	SPCC1682.06	sre2	SPCC1682.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.629910551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759228	2541044	2539743	277559	276295	SPBC354.05c	SPBC16A3.08c	sre2	oga1	-	SPBC16A3.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.843704988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759229	2541044	2539588	277559	276146	SPBC354.05c	SPCC962.04	sre2	rps1201	-	rps12|rps12-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.399112777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759230	2541044	2543374	277559	279796	SPBC354.05c	SPAPB1A10.08	sre2	SPAPB1A10.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.332448249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759231	2541044	2543333	277559	279756	SPBC354.05c	SPAC694.02	sre2	SPAC694.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.44104653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759232	2541044	2540859	277559	277376	SPBC354.05c	SPBC4C3.09	sre2	SPBC4C3.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386896395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759233	2541044	2542571	277559	279027	SPBC354.05c	SPAC589.02c	sre2	med13	-	spTrap240|srb9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.447904876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759234	2540741	2541912	277264	278402	SPBC83.05	SPAC222.16c	SPBC83.05	csn3	-	SPAC821.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.880129265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759235	2540741	2542277	277264	278746	SPBC83.05	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC83.05	dbr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.118107319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759236	2540741	2539293	277264	275861	SPBC83.05	SPCC553.08c	SPBC83.05	ria1	-	SPCC553.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.746561319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759237	2540741	2540342	277264	276871	SPBC83.05	SPBC2G2.01c	SPBC83.05	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38716973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759238	2540741	2543628	277264	280042	SPBC83.05	SPAC3H8.10	SPBC83.05	spo20	-	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842897825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759239	2540741	2542940	277264	279381	SPBC83.05	SPAC31A2.12	SPBC83.05	SPAC31A2.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.49785662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759240	2539312	2540060	275879	276598	SPCC777.14	SPBC106.01	prp4	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.473122366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759241	2539312	3361210	275879	280286	SPCC777.14	SPBC16E9.16c	prp4	lsd90	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.117971267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759242	2539312	2542598	275879	279052	SPCC777.14	SPAC6G10.08	prp4	idp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.692765503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759243	2539312	2540885	275879	277402	SPCC777.14	SPBC660.14	prp4	mik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.070209634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759244	2539312	2542723	275879	279174	SPCC777.14	SPAC25H1.03	prp4	atg101	-	mug66	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.630054443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759245	2539312	2541343	275879	277854	SPCC777.14	SPBPB2B2.19c	prp4	SPBPB2B2.19c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.164849843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759246	2539312	2543637	275879	280051	SPCC777.14	SPAC3H8.02	prp4	csr102	-	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.518138149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759247	2539312	2543152	275879	279584	SPCC777.14	SPAC869.03c	prp4	SPAC869.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.192603475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759248	2539312	2540026	275879	276570	SPCC777.14	SPBC16D10.08c	prp4	hsp104	-	SPBC16D10.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.882321245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759249	2539312	2542671	275879	279124	SPCC777.14	SPAC824.09c	prp4	SPAC824.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633982807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759250	2539312	2540131	275879	276668	SPCC777.14	SPBC1778.05c	prp4	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389720063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759251	2539312	2540901	275879	277417	SPCC777.14	SPBC4F6.16c	prp4	ero11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926037412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759252	2539312	2542378	275879	278842	SPCC777.14	SPAC1805.04	prp4	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.899908624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759253	2539312	2539035	275879	275608	SPCC777.14	SPCC794.09c	prp4	tef101	-	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.293075804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759254	2539312	2540198	275879	276731	SPCC777.14	SPBC1709.04c	prp4	cyp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.846123511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759255	2539312	3361561	275879	280637	SPCC777.14	SPAC11E3.01c	prp4	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.56021055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759256	2539312	2541130	275879	277645	SPCC777.14	SPBC776.11	prp4	rpl2801	-	rpl28-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.741244241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759257	2539312	2539939	275879	276483	SPCC777.14	SPBC11G11.01	prp4	fis1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.082942654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759258	2539312	2541438	275879	277943	SPCC777.14	SPAC23G3.10c	prp4	ssr3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814581912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759259	2539312	2540099	275879	276637	SPCC777.14	SPBC16H5.11c	prp4	skb1	-	rmt5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.326056403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759260	2539312	2541853	275879	278344	SPCC777.14	SPAC2F3.11	prp4	SPAC2F3.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634167365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759261	2539312	2542443	275879	278905	SPCC777.14	SPAC17G6.13	prp4	slt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579521287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759262	2539312	2541117	275879	277632	SPCC777.14	SPBC646.13	prp4	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.270019001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759263	2539312	2541633	275879	278129	SPCC777.14	SPAC664.01c	prp4	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.688213519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759264	2539312	2540474	275879	277002	SPCC777.14	SPBC26H8.09c	prp4	snf59	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.119768863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759265	2539312	2540035	275879	276577	SPCC777.14	SPBC16A3.06	prp4	SPBC16A3.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.560152611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759266	2539312	2543164	275879	279595	SPCC777.14	SPAC3G6.06c	prp4	rad2	-	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.268564853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759267	2539312	5802945	275879	858083	SPCC777.14	SPAC19G12.16c	prp4	adg2	-	SPAC23A1.01c|mug46	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.055926349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759268	2539312	2540686	275879	277211	SPCC777.14	SPBC21D10.10	prp4	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512941517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759269	2539312	2542103	275879	278579	SPCC777.14	SPAC31G5.11	prp4	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.997453057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759270	2539312	2540579	275879	277105	SPCC777.14	SPBC28E12.02	prp4	SPBC28E12.02	-	SPBC9B6.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.260567118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759271	2539312	2542040	275879	278521	SPCC777.14	SPAC212.01c	prp4	SPAC212.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.002845506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759272	2539312	3361375	275879	280451	SPCC777.14	SPAC212.06c	prp4	SPAC212.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.300828866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759273	2539312	2539226	275879	275796	SPCC777.14	SPCC16C4.20c	prp4	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512518877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759274	2539312	2539420	275879	275985	SPCC777.14	SPCC970.07c	prp4	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.678941174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759275	2539312	2541408	275879	277916	SPCC777.14	SPBPB2B2.14c	prp4	SPBPB2B2.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.839303016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759276	2539312	2542050	275879	278529	SPCC777.14	SPAC212.02	prp4	SPAC212.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.901501126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759277	2539312	2542677	275879	279130	SPCC777.14	SPAC26F1.10c	prp4	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.915232517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759278	2539312	2541013	275879	277528	SPCC777.14	SPBC3H7.13	prp4	far10	-	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703673875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759279	2539312	2541205	275879	277719	SPCC777.14	SPBC839.02	prp4	SPBC839.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.504476365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759280	2539312	2538847	275879	275428	SPCC777.14	SPCC594.06c	prp4	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.119547876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759281	2539312	2542641	275879	279095	SPCC777.14	SPAC24C9.15c	prp4	spn5	-	mde9|meu28	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.77664092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759282	2539312	2541682	275879	278178	SPCC777.14	SPAC15F9.02	prp4	seh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44403089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759283	2539312	2539235	275879	275805	SPCC777.14	SPCC1682.15	prp4	mug122	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.513336244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759284	2539312	2540029	275879	276573	SPCC777.14	SPBC16A3.01	prp4	spn3	-	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.786826508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759285	2539312	2542724	275879	279175	SPCC777.14	SPAC767.01c	prp4	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.875211727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759286	2539312	2543453	275879	279873	SPCC777.14	SPAC3G9.03	prp4	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.990847426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759287	2539312	2541503	275879	278005	SPCC777.14	SPAC22A12.01c	prp4	pso2	-	SPAC56F8.17c|snm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.678261342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759288	2539312	2541026	275879	277541	SPCC777.14	SPBC337.09	prp4	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.268127824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759289	2539312	2542627	275879	279081	SPCC777.14	SPAC750.04c	prp4	SPAC750.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.974834793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759290	2539312	2539797	275879	276347	SPCC777.14	SPBC16G5.14c	prp4	rps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.258305463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759291	2539312	2540160	275879	276695	SPCC777.14	SPBC1773.17c	prp4	SPBC1773.17c	-	SPBP26C9.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.620593755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759292	2539312	2541558	275879	278057	SPCC777.14	SPAC1F7.08	prp4	fio1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.435718133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759293	2539312	2543048	275879	279483	SPCC777.14	SPAC3F10.02c	prp4	trk1	-	sptrk	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509098177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759294	2539312	2539937	275879	276481	SPCC777.14	SPBC1539.08	prp4	arf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769696238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759295	2539312	2541530	275879	278030	SPCC777.14	SPAC57A10.10c	prp4	sla1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.006329266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759296	2539312	2541998	275879	278482	SPCC777.14	SPAC23A1.09	prp4	SPAC23A1.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.083436964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759297	2539312	2540993	275879	277509	SPCC777.14	SPBC342.01c	prp4	alg6	-	SPBC3F6.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325062014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759298	2539312	2540727	275879	277250	SPCC777.14	SPBC1921.03c	prp4	mex67	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45381812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759299	2539312	2541323	275879	277835	SPCC777.14	SPBP35G2.14	prp4	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.346826084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759300	2539312	2542969	275879	279409	SPCC777.14	SPAC4G8.10	prp4	gos1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.484229723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759301	2539312	2541436	275879	277941	SPCC777.14	SPAC11H11.03c	prp4	SPAC11H11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513177724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759302	2539312	2543308	275879	279732	SPCC777.14	SPAC694.04c	prp4	SPAC694.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.407725755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759303	2539312	2540595	275879	277121	SPCC777.14	SPBC21C3.02c	prp4	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.813683022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759304	2539312	2542220	275879	278694	SPCC777.14	SPAC1A6.03c	prp4	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.981129048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759305	2539312	2542146	275879	278622	SPCC777.14	SPAC1B3.10c	prp4	SPAC1B3.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.660184898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759306	2539312	2539648	275879	276203	SPCC777.14	SPBC1198.08	prp4	SPBC1198.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.755093216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759307	2539312	2539244	275879	275814	SPCC777.14	SPCC1672.06c	prp4	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.413939537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759308	2539312	2543551	275879	279968	SPCC777.14	SPAC4G8.06c	prp4	trm12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.185292259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759309	2539312	2542082	275879	278559	SPCC777.14	SPAC29B12.10c	prp4	pgt1	-	opt1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.009492674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759310	2539312	2541522	275879	278023	SPCC777.14	SPAC23E2.01	prp4	fep1	-	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.722460237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759311	2539312	2541416	275879	277923	SPCC777.14	SPBCPT2R1.01c	prp4	SPBCPT2R1.01c	-	SPBPB2B2.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.518077329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759312	2539312	2542791	275879	279240	SPCC777.14	SPAC167.04	prp4	pam17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.628763298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759313	2539312	2540825	275879	277343	SPCC777.14	SPBC428.08c	prp4	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.978466292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759314	2539312	2541844	275879	278335	SPCC777.14	SPAC22A12.17c	prp4	SPAC22A12.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7124688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759315	2539312	2540303	275879	276833	SPCC777.14	SPBC354.01	prp4	gtp1	-	SPBC649.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.692570463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759316	2539312	2541021	275879	277536	SPCC777.14	SPBC3B8.10c	prp4	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.118982089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759317	2539312	2540964	275879	277480	SPCC777.14	SPBC365.16	prp4	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.193851924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759318	2539312	2543573	275879	279988	SPCC777.14	SPAC869.11	prp4	cat1	-	SPAC922.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.117066273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759319	2539312	3361461	275879	280537	SPCC777.14	SPAC11H11.01	prp4	sst6	-	cps23	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.378433967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759320	2539312	2543537	275879	279954	SPCC777.14	SPAC4D7.05	prp4	sum1	-	tif34	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923405649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759321	2539312	2541885	275879	278375	SPCC777.14	SPAC22H10.03c	prp4	kap114	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318736294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759322	2539312	2539051	275879	275624	SPCC777.14	SPCC1183.11	prp4	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.021109746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759323	2539312	2543020	275879	279456	SPCC777.14	SPAC10F6.13c	prp4	SPAC10F6.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.811812959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759324	2539312	2540931	275879	277447	SPCC777.14	SPBC365.07c	prp4	SPBC365.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647673866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759325	2539312	2542484	275879	278944	SPCC777.14	SPAC1A6.07	prp4	sle1	-	SPAC1A6.07|seg1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.072154747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759326	2539312	2542964	275879	279404	SPCC777.14	SPAC12G12.07c	prp4	SPAC12G12.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.76258763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759327	2539312	2543102	275879	279534	SPCC777.14	SPAC31G5.21	prp4	SPAC31G5.21	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.270216924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759328	2539312	2542249	275879	278719	SPCC777.14	SPAC30D11.14c	prp4	SPAC30D11.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.721533784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759329	2539312	2541160	275879	277675	SPCC777.14	SPBC725.09c	prp4	hob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.938112306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759330	2539312	2543483	275879	279903	SPCC777.14	SPAPB2B4.02	prp4	grx5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6321264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759331	2539312	2539984	275879	276528	SPCC777.14	SPBC1289.11	prp4	spf38	-	cwf17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381555816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759332	2539312	2542123	275879	278599	SPCC777.14	SPAC18G6.15	prp4	mal3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574869958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759333	2539312	2540673	275879	277198	SPCC777.14	SPBC1D7.03	prp4	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.35547976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759334	2539312	2541192	275879	277706	SPCC777.14	SPBC83.17	prp4	SPBC83.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513220368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759335	2539312	2542464	275879	278925	SPCC777.14	SPAC1A6.09c	prp4	lag1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.538562036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759336	2539312	2540363	275879	276892	SPCC777.14	SPBC2F12.09c	prp4	atf21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.098810053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759337	2539312	2542659	275879	279112	SPCC777.14	SPAC25B8.08	prp4	SPAC25B8.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817757355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759338	2539312	2540886	275879	277403	SPCC777.14	SPBC4F6.10	prp4	vps901	-	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.048007464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759339	2539312	2542989	275879	279427	SPCC777.14	SPAC11E3.13c	prp4	gas5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.422417447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759340	2539312	2543531	275879	279949	SPCC777.14	SPAC926.06c	prp4	SPAC926.06c	-	lrr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.701343604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759341	2539312	2539484	275879	276047	SPCC777.14	SPCC594.04c	prp4	SPCC594.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.055024563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759342	2539312	2542873	275879	279318	SPCC777.14	SPAC9G1.02	prp4	wis4	-	wak1|wik1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.941793545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759343	2539312	2542921	275879	279362	SPCC777.14	SPAC1093.01	prp4	ppr5	-	SPAC12B10.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504886942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759344	2539312	2539999	275879	276543	SPCC777.14	SPBC1734.15	prp4	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776951149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759345	2539312	2541096	275879	277611	SPCC777.14	SPBC725.10	prp4	SPBC725.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439732959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759346	2539312	2539857	275879	276404	SPCC777.14	SPBC1604.20c	prp4	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391052056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759347	2539312	2540452	275879	276980	SPCC777.14	SPBC2A9.11c	prp4	iss9	-	SPBC2A9.11c|SPBC2D10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.825408623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759348	2539312	2542357	275879	278822	SPCC777.14	SPAC1782.07	prp4	qcr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.645833082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759349	2539312	2542651	275879	279105	SPCC777.14	SPAC24C9.12c	prp4	SPAC24C9.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.351814507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759350	2539312	2543643	275879	280057	SPCC777.14	SPAC3G9.07c	prp4	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.057045358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759351	2539312	2541899	275879	278389	SPCC777.14	SPAC22E12.11c	prp4	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.973855007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759352	2539312	2540086	275879	276624	SPCC777.14	SPBC16H5.12c	prp4	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.39063035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759353	2539312	2540326	275879	276856	SPCC777.14	SPBC2G5.06c	prp4	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.316836452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759354	2539312	2541824	275879	278315	SPCC777.14	SPAC27E2.02	prp4	SPAC27E2.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.329136958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759355	2539312	2539667	275879	276222	SPCC777.14	SPBC13G1.08c	prp4	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.053504079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759356	2539312	2542861	275879	279307	SPCC777.14	SPAC13G7.13c	prp4	msa1	-	SPAC6C3.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.911338006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759357	2539312	2542782	275879	279231	SPCC777.14	SPAC1687.06c	prp4	rpl44	-	rpl28	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.48485151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759358	2539312	3361269	275879	280345	SPCC777.14	SPBC31A8.01c	prp4	rtn1	-	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.846124917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759359	2539312	2540665	275879	277190	SPCC777.14	SPBC83.02c	prp4	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.708466936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759360	2539312	2538873	275879	275452	SPCC777.14	SPCC306.11	prp4	SPCC306.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.74541121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759361	2539312	2542710	275879	279163	SPCC777.14	SPAC750.08c	prp4	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510689141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759362	2539312	3361569	275879	280645	SPCC777.14	SPAC186.04c	prp4	SPAC186.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.534947254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759363	2539312	2538849	275879	275430	SPCC777.14	SPCC330.14c	prp4	rpl2402	-	rpl24-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.991348467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759364	2539312	2540394	275879	276922	SPCC777.14	SPBC2D10.09	prp4	snr1	-	SPBC2D10.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384443804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759365	2539312	2541903	275879	278393	SPCC777.14	SPAC22F8.05	prp4	SPAC22F8.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.956337654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759366	2539312	2540836	275879	277354	SPCC777.14	SPBC18H10.19	prp4	vps38	-	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.761731135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759367	2539312	2540077	275879	276615	SPCC777.14	SPBC17D11.04c	prp4	nto1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701749452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759368	2539312	2541248	275879	277762	SPCC777.14	SPBC8D2.10c	prp4	rmt3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636685623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759369	2539312	2543301	275879	279726	SPCC777.14	SPAC977.17	prp4	SPAC977.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.171557025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759370	2539312	2542398	275879	278862	SPCC777.14	SPAC1805.03c	prp4	trm13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77882866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759371	2539312	2542549	275879	279006	SPCC777.14	SPAC19A8.11c	prp4	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.336687722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759372	2539312	2542519	275879	278977	SPCC777.14	SPAC19G12.08	prp4	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453348745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759373	2539312	2543683	275879	280097	SPCC777.14	SPAPB1E7.04c	prp4	SPAPB1E7.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.957001198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759374	2539312	2538708	275879	275292	SPCC777.14	SPCC594.01	prp4	SPCC594.01	-	SPCC736.16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.543387892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759375	2539312	2541296	275879	277808	SPCC777.14	SPBP8B7.06	prp4	rpp201	-	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.427903053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759376	2539312	3361030	275879	280106	SPCC777.14	SPCP20C8.03	prp4	SPCP20C8.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382625521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759377	2539312	2541680	275879	278176	SPCC777.14	SPAC22F8.09	prp4	rrp16	-	nop53	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.475591441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759378	2539312	2540357	275879	276886	SPCC777.14	SPBC2F12.05c	prp4	SPBC2F12.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.110406025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759379	2539312	2539421	275879	275986	SPCC777.14	SPCC794.11c	prp4	ent3	-	SPCC794.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.88180494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759380	2539312	2542255	275879	278725	SPCC777.14	SPAC57A7.08	prp4	pzh1	-	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.006845788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759381	2539312	2541337	275879	277848	SPCC777.14	SPBP35G2.13c	prp4	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.274353705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759382	2539312	2542781	275879	279230	SPCC777.14	SPAC57A10.12c	prp4	ura3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.978571837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759383	2539312	2540930	275879	277446	SPCC777.14	SPBC354.10	prp4	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.157339565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759384	2539312	2541963	275879	278449	SPCC777.14	SPAC21E11.04	prp4	aca1	-	ppr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147887903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759385	2539312	2538848	275879	275429	SPCC777.14	SPCC613.12c	prp4	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.189544303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759386	2539312	2541896	275879	278386	SPCC777.14	SPAC23H4.16c	prp4	SPAC23H4.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780573143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759387	2539312	2540643	275879	277168	SPCC777.14	SPBC19G7.06	prp4	mbx1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.709344049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759388	2539312	2539877	275879	276423	SPCC777.14	SPBC16G5.07c	prp4	SPBC16G5.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.194975894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759389	2539312	2542170	275879	278645	SPCC777.14	SPAC17G8.13c	prp4	mst2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.874122867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759390	2539312	2539706	275879	276259	SPCC777.14	SPBC16G5.13	prp4	ptf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.75907153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759391	2539312	2543113	275879	279545	SPCC777.14	SPAC3F10.07c	prp4	erf4	-	mug91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.079115862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759392	2539312	2539748	275879	276300	SPCC777.14	SPBC11C11.01	prp4	SPBC11C11.01	-	SPBC17D1.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.747116829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759393	2539312	2538762	275879	275345	SPCC777.14	SPCC306.04c	prp4	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.990346581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759394	2539312	2542167	275879	278642	SPCC777.14	SPAC17C9.11c	prp4	SPAC17C9.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.202395483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759395	2539312	2543071	275879	279504	SPCC777.14	SPAC3C7.06c	prp4	pit1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.954569455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759396	2539312	2542883	275879	279328	SPCC777.14	SPAC1486.04c	prp4	alm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.064216449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759397	2539312	2542515	275879	278973	SPCC777.14	SPAC1952.09c	prp4	SPAC1952.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.75392382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759398	2539312	2540800	275879	277319	SPCC777.14	SPBC409.20c	prp4	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.509315984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759399	2539312	2540152	275879	276688	SPCC777.14	SPBC12C2.03c	prp4	SPBC12C2.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.352045557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759400	2539312	2538717	275879	275301	SPCC777.14	SPCC1235.02	prp4	bio2	-	SPCC320.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.067924314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759401	2539312	2539159	275879	275731	SPCC777.14	SPCC1235.01	prp4	SPCC1235.01	-	SPCC320.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.407636826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759402	2539312	2542113	275879	278589	SPCC777.14	SPAC1B3.11c	prp4	ypt4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877258679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759403	2539312	2542940	275879	279381	SPCC777.14	SPAC31A2.12	prp4	SPAC31A2.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.048058921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759404	2539312	2542294	275879	278762	SPCC777.14	SPAC1805.09c	prp4	fmt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.123240922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759405	2539312	2543130	275879	279562	SPCC777.14	SPAC869.05c	prp4	SPAC869.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323494462	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759406	2539312	2538714	275879	275298	SPCC777.14	SPCC330.11	prp4	btb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.12214558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759407	2539312	2541425	275879	277930	SPCC777.14	SPAC2C4.17c	prp4	msy2	-	SPAC2C4.17c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.250171682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759408	2539312	2540725	275879	277248	SPCC777.14	SPBC215.14c	prp4	vps20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.560463917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759409	2539312	2541531	275879	278031	SPCC777.14	SPAC25A8.01c	prp4	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.101999438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759410	2539312	2540654	275879	277179	SPCC777.14	SPBC19F5.01c	prp4	puc1	-	SPBP8B7.32c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325070758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759411	2539312	2539013	275879	275586	SPCC777.14	SPCC364.03	prp4	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.056031922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759412	2539312	2542025	275879	278507	SPCC777.14	SPAC23C11.01	prp4	SPAC23C11.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852853741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759413	2539312	2540829	275879	277347	SPCC777.14	SPBC800.09	prp4	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.423005997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759414	2539312	2541860	275879	278350	SPCC777.14	SPAC22F3.02	prp4	atf31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.78051123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759415	2539312	2542042	275879	278523	SPCC777.14	SPAC23A1.14c	prp4	SPAC23A1.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.316376588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759416	2539312	2541229	275879	277743	SPCC777.14	SPBC839.05c	prp4	rps1701	-	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441461009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759417	2539312	2542051	275879	278530	SPCC777.14	SPAC23C11.06c	prp4	SPAC23C11.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381651853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759418	2539312	2543091	275879	279524	SPCC777.14	SPAC12G12.15	prp4	sif3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576035079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759419	2539312	2542222	275879	278695	SPCC777.14	SPAC31G5.18c	prp4	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.453767394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759420	2539312	2543427	275879	279847	SPCC777.14	SPAPB1A10.15	prp4	arv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.987077893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759421	2539312	2542727	275879	279177	SPCC777.14	SPAC26A3.02	prp4	myh1	-	myh	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819959658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759422	2539312	2542826	275879	279273	SPCC777.14	SPAC13G6.09	prp4	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.623931887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759423	2539312	2541404	275879	277913	SPCC777.14	SPBPB2B2.18	prp4	SPBPB2B2.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.602131594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759424	2539312	2541380	275879	277891	SPCC777.14	SPBPB2B2.13	prp4	gal1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.334878092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759425	2539312	2543420	275879	279842	SPCC777.14	SPAC3H1.04c	prp4	mdm31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.497044759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759426	2539312	2542628	275879	279082	SPCC777.14	SPAC24H6.06	prp4	sld3	-	mug175	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043014771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759427	2539312	2541744	275879	278238	SPCC777.14	SPAC23A1.02c	prp4	SPAC23A1.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.212396536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759428	2539312	2540333	275879	276863	SPCC777.14	SPBC21B10.07	prp4	SPBC21B10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505622189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759429	2539312	2539170	275879	275741	SPCC777.14	SPCC306.02c	prp4	SPCC306.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.338378383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759430	2539312	2540278	275879	276809	SPCC777.14	SPBC1A4.04	prp4	SPBC1A4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.630737473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759431	2539312	2540380	275879	276909	SPCC777.14	SPBC1A4.05	prp4	blt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.641578759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759432	2539312	2540140	275879	276677	SPCC777.14	SPBC16C6.08c	prp4	qcr6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.048884135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759433	2539312	2543525	275879	279943	SPCC777.14	SPAC4A8.14	prp4	SPAC4A8.14	-	prs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.673773268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759434	2539312	2539189	275879	275760	SPCC777.14	SPCC1682.16	prp4	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.617428857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759435	2539312	2541084	275879	277599	SPCC777.14	SPBC649.02	prp4	rps1902	-	rps19|rps19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.61544121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759436	2539312	2543337	275879	279760	SPCC777.14	SPAC959.08	prp4	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.132236527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759437	2539312	2543486	275879	279906	SPCC777.14	SPAC959.07	prp4	rps403	-	rps4|rps4-3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321850962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759438	2539312	2541238	275879	277752	SPCC777.14	SPBC8E4.05c	prp4	SPBC8E4.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.769595045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759439	2539312	2542716	275879	279169	SPCC777.14	SPAC25H1.07	prp4	emc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874675468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759440	2539312	3361165	275879	280241	SPCC777.14	SPBC1348.12	prp4	SPBC1348.12	-	SPAC1348.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699429875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759441	2539312	2543220	275879	279648	SPCC777.14	SPAPB21F2.02	prp4	SPAPB21F2.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.435783214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759442	2539312	2543400	275879	279822	SPCC777.14	SPAC3G9.11c	prp4	SPAC3G9.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.973162097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759443	2539312	2541357	275879	277868	SPCC777.14	SPBPB7E8.01	prp4	SPBPB7E8.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515979884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759444	2539312	2541806	275879	278297	SPCC777.14	SPAC4G8.13c	prp4	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.444849714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759445	2539312	2543387	275879	279809	SPCC777.14	SPAPB1E7.02c	prp4	mcl1	-	slr3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926128039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759446	2539312	2540766	275879	277286	SPCC777.14	SPBC19C2.02	prp4	pmt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933153063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759447	2539312	2539128	275879	275700	SPCC777.14	SPCC1682.06	prp4	SPCC1682.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.263632923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759448	2539312	2540828	275879	277346	SPCC777.14	SPBC4B4.06	prp4	vps25	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.381842187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759449	2539312	3361517	275879	280593	SPCC777.14	SPAP11E10.02c	prp4	mam3	-	SPAPB1A10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.03637282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759450	2539312	2542795	275879	279243	SPCC777.14	SPAC9G1.05	prp4	aip1	-	SPAC9G1.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.150168251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759451	2539312	2541050	275879	277565	SPCC777.14	SPBC428.05c	prp4	arg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452780364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759452	2539312	2543151	275879	279583	SPCC777.14	SPAC343.06c	prp4	SPAC343.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923026219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759453	2539312	2543372	275879	279794	SPCC777.14	SPAPB1A10.09	prp4	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.088544127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759454	2539312	2543374	275879	279796	SPCC777.14	SPAPB1A10.08	prp4	SPAPB1A10.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.70249346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759455	2539312	2543333	275879	279756	SPCC777.14	SPAC694.02	prp4	SPAC694.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714132401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759456	2539312	2543090	275879	279523	SPCC777.14	SPBC1348.01	prp4	SPBC1348.01	-	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7686576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759457	2539312	2540383	275879	276912	SPCC777.14	SPBC31E1.02c	prp4	pmr1	-	cps5|pgak2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992888624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759458	2539312	2540309	275879	276839	SPCC777.14	SPBC21B10.13c	prp4	yox1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505419441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759459	2539312	2541124	275879	277639	SPCC777.14	SPBC646.02	prp4	cwf11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.063838769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759460	2539312	3361295	275879	280371	SPCC777.14	SPBC1921.01c	prp4	rpl35b	-	rpl37|rpl37-1|rpl3701|SPBC29C10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381370282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759461	2539312	2542943	275879	279384	SPCC777.14	SPBC1348.03	prp4	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515205625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759462	2539312	2540938	275879	277454	SPCC777.14	SPBC365.14c	prp4	uge1	-	gal10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.33068929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759463	2539312	2541576	275879	278073	SPCC777.14	SPBC1348.02	prp4	SPBC1348.02	-	SPAC1348.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.132398672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759464	2539312	2543646	275879	280060	SPCC777.14	SPAC821.07c	prp4	moc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.55906065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759465	2539312	2540208	275879	276741	SPCC777.14	SPBC9B6.03	prp4	SPBC9B6.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321308375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759466	2539312	2542617	275879	279071	SPCC777.14	SPAC13A11.01c	prp4	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378603066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759467	2539312	2541875	275879	278365	SPCC777.14	SPAC22F3.06c	prp4	lon1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.402730773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759468	2539312	2540073	275879	276611	SPCC777.14	SPBC1539.07c	prp4	fmd1	-	SPBC1539.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.050644126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759469	2539312	2540649	275879	277174	SPCC777.14	SPBC19F8.08	prp4	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.870014634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759470	2539845	2542207	276393	278682	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC17H9.10c	ste20	ddb1	ste16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.023987953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759471	2539845	2543565	276393	279981	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAPB24D3.04c	ste20	mag1	ste16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194271917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759472	2539845	2540060	276393	276598	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC106.01	ste20	mph1	ste16	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.607479694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759473	2539845	2539151	276393	275723	SPBC12C2.02c	SPCC1235.12c	ste20	mug146	ste16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989727925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759474	2539845	2542577	276393	279033	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC19G12.15c	ste20	tpp1	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.934611424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759475	2539845	2541512	276393	278013	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC11E3.08c	ste20	nse6	ste16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.144894664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759476	2539845	2540956	276393	277472	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC409.06	ste20	uch2	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.916944981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759477	2539845	2540131	276393	276668	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC1778.05c	ste20	SPBC1778.05c	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.991950691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759478	2539845	2539301	276393	275869	SPBC12C2.02c	SPCC622.03c	ste20	SPCC622.03c	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767862934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759479	2539845	2540994	276393	277510	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC337.11	ste20	SPBC337.11	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.152773325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759480	2539845	2540995	276393	277511	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC337.16	ste20	cho1	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.703146765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759481	2539845	2540198	276393	276731	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC1709.04c	ste20	cyp3	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388348464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759482	2539845	2542831	276393	279278	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC20H4.08	ste20	whi2	ste16	SPAC20H4.08|SPAC145.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205187547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759483	2539845	2539930	276393	276474	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC1198.11c	ste20	reb1	ste16	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.41691072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759484	2539845	2539876	276393	276422	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC1734.07c	ste20	trs8502	ste16	SPBC1734.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577650353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759485	2539845	2540068	276393	276606	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC1734.12c	ste20	alg12	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.98208031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759486	2539845	2539939	276393	276483	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC11G11.01	ste20	fis1	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64588834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759487	2539845	2539097	276393	275669	SPBC12C2.02c	SPCC757.04	ste20	SPCC757.04	ste16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87767731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759488	2539845	2541117	276393	277632	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC646.13	ste20	sds23	ste16	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.570002563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759489	2539845	2543594	276393	280009	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC8F11.05c	ste20	mug130	ste16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094384693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759490	2539845	2542546	276393	279003	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC1399.05c	ste20	toe1	ste16	SPAC1399.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.672343394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759491	2539845	2542392	276393	278856	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC19D5.02c	ste20	SPAC19D5.02c	ste16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.245229507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759492	2539845	2542103	276393	278579	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC31G5.11	ste20	pac2	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.562399368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759493	2539845	2541082	276393	277597	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC577.11	ste20	SPBC577.11	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.872552067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759494	2539845	2540826	276393	277344	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC409.17c	ste20	SPBC409.17c	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.841886663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759495	2539845	2540535	276393	277062	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC215.01	ste20	SPBC215.01	ste16	SPBC3B9.20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.386145715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759496	2539845	2539226	276393	275796	SPBC12C2.02c	SPCC16C4.20c	ste20	SPCC16C4.20c	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.836562102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759497	2539845	2541951	276393	278438	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC222.05c	ste20	mss1	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.053410662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759498	2539845	2540564	276393	277091	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC530.03c	ste20	bag102	ste16	bag1-b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711966801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759499	2539845	2541208	276393	277722	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC887.04c	ste20	lub1	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.319315887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759500	2539845	2540029	276393	276573	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC16A3.01	ste20	spn3	ste16	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.556090608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759501	2539845	2543681	276393	280095	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC9.02c	ste20	SPAC9.02c	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.380137046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759502	2539845	2542689	276393	279142	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC29B12.04	ste20	snz1	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.609578921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759503	2539845	2542724	276393	279175	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC767.01c	ste20	vps1	ste16	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.845168601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759504	2539845	2539256	276393	275826	SPBC12C2.02c	SPCC285.04	ste20	SPCC285.04	ste16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929380255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759505	2539845	2539434	276393	275997	SPBC12C2.02c	SPCC757.09c	ste20	rnc1	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324607271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759506	2539845	2541026	276393	277541	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC337.09	ste20	erg28	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.074913771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759507	2539845	2540313	276393	276843	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC337.04	ste20	ppk27	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.260520077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759508	2539845	2540220	276393	276753	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC337.03	ste20	rhn1	ste16	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.555539985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759509	2539845	2543030	276393	279466	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC12B10.10	ste20	nod1	ste16	SPAC12B10.10	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037117983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759510	2539845	2540160	276393	276695	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC1773.17c	ste20	SPBC1773.17c	ste16	SPBP26C9.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448188796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759511	2539845	2541119	276393	277634	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC651.11c	ste20	apm3	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389380195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759512	2539845	2540463	276393	276991	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC2F12.15c	ste20	pfa3	ste16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040492221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759513	2539845	2540993	276393	277509	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC342.01c	ste20	alg6	ste16	SPBC3F6.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865657865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759514	2539845	2541323	276393	277835	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBP35G2.14	ste20	SPBP35G2.14	ste16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.770036401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759515	2539845	2540425	276393	276953	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC27.06c	ste20	mgr2	ste16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873528565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759516	2539845	2541527	276393	278027	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC31A2.09c	ste20	apm4	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.565793541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759517	2539845	2540482	276393	277010	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC25H2.14	ste20	mug16	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327657331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759518	2539845	2539721	276393	276274	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC146.04	ste20	SPBC146.04	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.010275372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759519	2539845	2542180	276393	278655	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC589.07c	ste20	atg1801	ste16	atg18|atg18a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.404201296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759520	2539845	2539823	276393	276373	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC16A3.18	ste20	cip1	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979741579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759521	2539845	2539820	276393	276370	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC1709.13c	ste20	set10	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.286085024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759522	2539845	3361149	276393	280225	SPBC12C2.02c	SPCC1919.06c	ste20	wtf25	ste16	wtf9-pseudo	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.50609162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759523	2539845	2543584	276393	279999	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAPB1E7.11c	ste20	SPAPB1E7.11c	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.774543329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759524	2539845	2540883	276393	277400	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC577.06c	ste20	stt4	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.705909927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759525	2539845	2543319	276393	279743	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC6B12.09	ste20	trm10	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.31570585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759526	2539845	2541663	276393	278159	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC22G7.08	ste20	ppk8	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775849232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759527	2539845	2539381	276393	275947	SPBC12C2.02c	SPCC1739.10	ste20	mug33	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.252091248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759528	2539845	2542213	276393	278687	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC3G6.13c	ste20	rpl4101	ste16	rpl41-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.872932355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759529	2539845	2541021	276393	277536	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC3B8.10c	ste20	nem1	ste16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.505942575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759530	2539845	2542268	276393	278737	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC17A5.07c	ste20	ulp2	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.510353891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759531	2539845	2541275	276393	277789	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC947.06c	ste20	SPBC947.06c	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.185499789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759532	2539845	2539705	276393	276258	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC1105.10	ste20	rav1	ste16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.411540385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759533	2539845	2543020	276393	279456	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC10F6.13c	ste20	SPAC10F6.13c	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.844892503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759534	2539845	2539870	276393	276416	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC1709.18	ste20	tif452	ste16	SPBC409.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.231164698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759535	2539845	2539952	276393	276496	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC1709.14	ste20	SPBC1709.14	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.743574249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759536	2539845	2541353	276393	277864	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBP35G2.11c	ste20	SPBP35G2.11c	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.076366206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759537	2539845	2538715	276393	275299	SPBC12C2.02c	SPCC1223.05c	ste20	rpl3702	ste16	rpl37|rpl37-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507174217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759538	2539845	2540903	276393	277419	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC530.05	ste20	prt1	ste16	SPBC530.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.686299416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759539	2539845	2541093	276393	277608	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC646.08c	ste20	SPBC646.08c	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.077222519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759540	2539845	2541288	276393	277801	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBP35G2.04c	ste20	SPBP35G2.04c	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.551578188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759541	2539845	2540401	276393	276929	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC2A9.02	ste20	SPBC2A9.02	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324986444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759542	2539845	2538770	276393	275353	SPBC12C2.02c	SPCC1753.02c	ste20	git3	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.193232934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759543	2539845	2542652	276393	279106	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC1687.15	ste20	gsk3	ste16	skp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149884036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759544	2539845	2541160	276393	277675	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC725.09c	ste20	hob3	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.846860491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759545	2539845	2540922	276393	277438	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC36.10	ste20	SPBC36.10	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.125096114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759546	2539845	2541735	276393	278229	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC7D4.04	ste20	atg11	ste16	taf1|cvt9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877361028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759547	2539845	2541889	276393	278379	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC2F7.03c	ste20	pom1	ste16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.267699874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759548	2539845	2542168	276393	278643	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC17A5.16	ste20	ftp105	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.252058706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759549	2539845	2539999	276393	276543	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC1734.15	ste20	rsc4	ste16	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.414458816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759550	2539845	2541096	276393	277611	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC725.10	ste20	SPBC725.10	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.561693117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759551	2539845	2541166	276393	277681	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC725.15	ste20	ura5	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.75994195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759552	2539845	2541183	276393	277697	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC725.14	ste20	arg6	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.488767703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759553	2539845	2541352	276393	277863	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBPJ4664.03	ste20	mfm3	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713436801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759554	2539845	2540772	276393	277292	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC216.04c	ste20	mxr2	ste16	SPBC216.04c|MsrB	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.006934101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759555	2539845	2542013	276393	278496	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC20H4.11c	ste20	rho5	ste16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817395052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759556	2539845	2540350	276393	276879	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC317.01	ste20	mbx2	ste16	pvg4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.802797559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759557	2539845	2541187	276393	277701	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC776.14	ste20	plh1	ste16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922242092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759558	2539845	2542409	276393	278873	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC17G8.10c	ste20	dma1	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842470049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759559	2539845	2541401	276393	277910	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBPB10D8.05c	ste20	SPBPB10D8.05c	ste16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.9808851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759560	2539845	2539667	276393	276222	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC13G1.08c	ste20	ash2	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.751003927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759561	2539845	3361269	276393	280345	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC31A8.01c	ste20	rtn1	ste16	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444304873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759562	2539845	2540176	276393	276709	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC1709.01	ste20	chs2	ste16	SPBC1734.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.994514782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759563	2539845	2540200	276393	276733	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC1709.06	ste20	dus2	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.765169782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759564	2539845	2540665	276393	277190	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC83.02c	ste20	rpl4302	ste16	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992808952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759565	2539845	2538945	276393	275519	SPBC12C2.02c	SPCC1739.06c	ste20	SPCC1739.06c	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.846444171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759566	2539845	2542946	276393	279386	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC6F12.03c	ste20	fsv1	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579115133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759567	2539845	2541326	276393	277838	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBP35G2.03c	ste20	sgo1	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.137447027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759568	2539845	2540371	276393	276900	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC36.11	ste20	SPBC36.11	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.818040698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759569	2539845	2541720	276393	278214	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC23H3.13c	ste20	gpa2	ste16	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.902499583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759570	2539845	2541900	276393	278390	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC23H4.17c	ste20	srb10	ste16	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.703148995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759571	2539845	2540327	276393	276857	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC31F10.07	ste20	lsb5	ste16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.969318148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759572	2539845	2539408	276393	275973	SPBC12C2.02c	SPCC576.12c	ste20	mhf2	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.918340559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759573	2539845	5802861	276393	857999	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC1D4.01	ste20	tls1	ste16	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382461607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759574	2539845	2539953	276393	276497	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC1709.11c	ste20	png2	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386287358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759575	2539845	2540094	276393	276632	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC146.10	ste20	mug57	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.223490892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759576	2539845	2539611	276393	276169	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC1734.09	ste20	yea4	ste16	SPBC1734.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.195242792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759577	2539845	2538708	276393	275292	SPBC12C2.02c	SPCC594.01	ste20	SPCC594.01	ste16	SPCC736.16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.518201581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759578	2539845	2541142	276393	277657	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC725.04	ste20	SPBC725.04	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507905229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759579	2539845	2541112	276393	277627	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC725.07	ste20	pex5	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.696865009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759580	2539845	2541536	276393	278036	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC1071.02	ste20	mms19	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.502723244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759581	2539845	2540342	276393	276871	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC2G2.01c	ste20	liz1	ste16	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.485972271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759582	2539845	2539847	276393	276395	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC530.14c	ste20	dsk1	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.815764494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759583	2539845	2538828	276393	275409	SPBC12C2.02c	SPCC1020.05	ste20	SPCC1020.05	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442680744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759584	2539845	2541186	276393	277700	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC725.01	ste20	SPBC725.01	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44408363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759585	2539845	2541337	276393	277848	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBP35G2.13c	ste20	swc2	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.74305203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759586	2539845	2539519	276393	276081	SPBC12C2.02c	SPCC364.05	ste20	vps3	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.754734267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759587	2539845	2540703	276393	277227	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC20F10.07	ste20	SPBC20F10.07	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.43974634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759588	2539845	2540946	276393	277462	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC36.04	ste20	cys11	ste16	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.876081842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759589	2539845	2541762	276393	278256	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC139.01c	ste20	SPAC139.01c	ste16	SPAC955.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.308314716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759590	2539845	2542875	276393	279320	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC13G7.02c	ste20	ssa1	ste16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.50981107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759591	2539845	2539906	276393	276452	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC16G5.17	ste20	SPBC16G5.17	ste16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865302643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759592	2539845	2542283	276393	278751	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC27F1.08	ste20	pdt1	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.993740617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759593	2539845	2542806	276393	279254	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC1610.01	ste20	saf5	ste16	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.193798763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759594	2539845	2543113	276393	279545	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC3F10.07c	ste20	erf4	ste16	mug91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389584001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759595	2539845	2539686	276393	276241	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC1734.06	ste20	rhp18	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.267383026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759596	2539845	2541798	276393	278289	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC22F3.03c	ste20	rdh54	ste16	mug34|tid1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.890058213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759597	2539845	2539082	276393	275654	SPBC12C2.02c	SPCC126.03	ste20	pus1	ste16	lps1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049159699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759598	2539845	2540619	276393	277145	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC25H2.15	ste20	SPBC25H2.15	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388022325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759599	2539845	2539137	276393	275709	SPBC12C2.02c	SPCC1682.08c	ste20	mcp2	ste16	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581440733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759600	2539845	2540121	276393	276658	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC119.14	ste20	rti1	ste16	rad22B	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.37757356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759601	2539845	2539896	276393	276442	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC146.02	ste20	SPBC146.02	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.294452373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759602	2539845	2541121	276393	277636	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC609.03	ste20	iqw1	ste16	iqwd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098677859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759603	2539845	2539030	276393	275603	SPBC12C2.02c	SPCP1E11.02	ste20	ppk38	ste16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045927513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759604	2539845	2540800	276393	277319	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC409.20c	ste20	psh3	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.187076518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759605	2539845	2543304	276393	279728	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC6B12.12	ste20	tom70	ste16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.733016855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759606	2539845	2541432	276393	277937	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC1F5.05c	ste20	mso1	ste16	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.870507379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759607	2539845	2543368	276393	279790	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC630.06c	ste20	SPAC630.06c	ste16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922801961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759608	2539845	2540304	276393	276834	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC354.13	ste20	rga6	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.621142424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759609	2539845	2540277	276393	276808	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC2D10.20	ste20	ubc1	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.772512791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759610	2539845	2543329	276393	279752	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC56F8.02	ste20	SPAC56F8.02	ste16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.461387804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759611	2539845	2540164	276393	276699	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC1683.03c	ste20	SPBC1683.03c	ste16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149877365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759612	2539845	2538692	276393	275277	SPBC12C2.02c	SPCC162.04c	ste20	wtf13	ste16	wtf12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047544047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759613	2539845	2541229	276393	277743	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC839.05c	ste20	rps1701	ste16	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391443287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759614	2539845	2541036	276393	277551	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC3H7.05c	ste20	SPBC3H7.05c	ste16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.8115204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759615	2539845	2539729	276393	276281	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC11B10.07c	ste20	ivn1	ste16	pi004|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32847659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759616	2539845	2539772	276393	276323	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC1734.05c	ste20	spf31	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.140101976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759617	2539845	2542826	276393	279273	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC13G6.09	ste20	SPAC13G6.09	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505547561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759618	2539845	2540516	276393	277044	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC21C3.01c	ste20	vps13a	ste16	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.551994065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759619	2539845	2541789	276393	278281	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC23H4.08	ste20	iwr1	ste16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.020981864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759620	2539845	2541122	276393	277637	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC646.06c	ste20	agn2	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.268623182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759621	2539845	2541356	276393	277867	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBP35G2.12	ste20	SPBP35G2.12	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.345632216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759622	2539845	2541244	276393	277758	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC8D2.02c	ste20	vps68	ste16	SPBC8D2.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.910731021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759623	2539845	2539205	276393	275775	SPBC12C2.02c	SPCC4B3.15	ste20	mid1	ste16	dmf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.132957005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759624	2539845	3361511	276393	280587	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC23C4.08	ste20	rho3	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.469531044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759625	2539845	2539375	276393	275941	SPBC12C2.02c	SPCC4G3.11	ste20	mug154	ste16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.714898388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759626	2539845	2540551	276393	277078	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC23E6.01c	ste20	cxr1	ste16	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.210832542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759627	2539845	2538840	276393	275421	SPBC12C2.02c	SPCC736.07c	ste20	SPCC736.07c	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.909035114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759628	2539845	2539189	276393	275760	SPBC12C2.02c	SPCC1682.16	ste20	rpt4	ste16	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.00939241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759629	2539845	2543337	276393	279760	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC959.08	ste20	rpl2102	ste16	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.331085517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759630	2539845	2542021	276393	278504	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAP14E8.02	ste20	tos4	ste16	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.471026521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759631	2539845	2541151	276393	277666	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC713.03	ste20	SPBC713.03	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.81030867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759632	2539845	2541238	276393	277752	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC8E4.05c	ste20	SPBC8E4.05c	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578113616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759633	2539845	2541806	276393	278297	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC4G8.13c	ste20	prz1	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.004819844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759634	2539845	2539259	276393	275829	SPBC12C2.02c	SPCC553.05c	ste20	wtf6	ste16	SPCC553.05c|SPCC553.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809866462	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759635	2539845	2541029	276393	277544	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC409.10	ste20	ade7	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.274215997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759636	2539845	2543076	276393	279509	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC30C2.07	ste20	SPAC30C2.07	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573415271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759637	2539845	2542399	276393	278863	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC1805.10	ste20	SPAC1805.10	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.3812963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759638	2539845	2540383	276393	276912	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC31E1.02c	ste20	pmr1	ste16	cps5|pgak2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.843240644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759639	2539845	2541124	276393	277639	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC646.02	ste20	cwf11	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.39171333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759640	2539845	2543472	276393	279892	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC959.04c	ste20	omh6	ste16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.767616214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759641	2539845	2542154	276393	278630	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC17G8.02	ste20	SPAC17G8.02	ste16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152964662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759642	2539845	2541875	276393	278365	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC22F3.06c	ste20	lon1	ste16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935571505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759643	2539845	2539001	276393	275575	SPBC12C2.02c	SPCC1494.08c	ste20	SPCC1494.08c	ste16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.544205279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759644	2539433	2542689	275996	279142	SPCC4E9.02	SPAC29B12.04	cig1	snz1	SPCC645.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820690971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759645	2539433	2543272	275996	279700	SPCC4E9.02	SPAC1002.07c	cig1	ats1	SPCC645.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815570129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759646	2539433	2542420	275996	278883	SPCC4E9.02	SPAC19D5.03	cig1	cid1	SPCC645.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09902561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759647	2539433	2538916	275996	275493	SPCC4E9.02	SPCC16C4.17	cig1	mug123	SPCC645.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506207264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759648	2541652	2539774	278148	276325	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC17A3.10	sty1	pas4	phh1|spc1	pi036	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.466204022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759649	2541652	2539147	278148	275719	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC622.12c	sty1	gdh1	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.084099776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759650	2541652	2543497	278148	279916	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC926.09c	sty1	fas1	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038815123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759651	2541652	2541902	278148	278392	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC27E2.07	sty1	pvg2	phh1|spc1	mug53	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.457597429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759652	2541652	2539549	278148	276110	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC576.01c	sty1	xan1	phh1|spc1	SPCC576.01c|SPCPB1C11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.630201167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759653	2541652	2542435	278148	278897	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC1805.16c	sty1	SPAC1805.16c	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.748848201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759654	2541652	2542598	278148	279052	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC6G10.08	sty1	idp1	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.127479551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759655	2541652	2542291	278148	278759	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC17C9.08	sty1	pnu1	phh1|spc1	end1|nuc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813233722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759656	2541652	2541343	278148	277854	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBPB2B2.19c	sty1	SPBPB2B2.19c	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.364622252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759657	2541652	2542143	278148	278619	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC17C9.07	sty1	alg8	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.209395003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759658	2541652	2541570	278148	278067	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC6G9.09c	sty1	rpl2401	phh1|spc1	rpl24|rpl24-01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714989564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759659	2541652	2543291	278148	279716	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC9E9.04	sty1	SPAC9E9.04	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820501824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759660	2541652	2539165	278148	275736	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC1281.04	sty1	SPCC1281.04	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.339507662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759661	2541652	2542127	278148	278603	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC1952.12c	sty1	csn71	phh1|spc1	csn7|csn7a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875920988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759662	2541652	2543064	278148	279497	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC3G6.01	sty1	hrp3	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.904500245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759663	2541652	2542671	278148	279124	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC824.09c	sty1	SPAC824.09c	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.806701839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759664	2541652	2540131	278148	276668	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC1778.05c	sty1	SPBC1778.05c	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979613649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759665	2541652	2542643	278148	279097	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC2C4.07c	sty1	dis32	phh1|spc1	SPAC2C4.07c|dis3L2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807306505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759666	2541652	2539582	278148	276141	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC594.07c	sty1	bqt3	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.557124373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759667	2541652	2542358	278148	278823	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC1782.09c	sty1	clp1	phh1|spc1	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.632408004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759668	2541652	2542378	278148	278842	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC1805.04	sty1	nup132	phh1|spc1	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.99088327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759669	2541652	2540528	278148	277056	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC18H10.04c	sty1	sce3	phh1|spc1	tif48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.419595862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759670	2541652	2539035	278148	275608	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC794.09c	sty1	tef101	phh1|spc1	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.259892198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759671	2541652	2538993	278148	275567	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC162.12	sty1	tco89	phh1|spc1	SPCC1753.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.50819131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759672	2541652	2542237	278148	278709	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC19E9.02	sty1	fin1	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447961226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759673	2541652	2539930	278148	276474	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC1198.11c	sty1	reb1	phh1|spc1	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.811829951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759674	2541652	3361561	278148	280637	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC11E3.01c	sty1	swr1	phh1|spc1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.436690105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759675	2541652	2541130	278148	277645	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC776.11	sty1	rpl2801	phh1|spc1	rpl28-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.348881197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759676	2541652	2540410	278148	276938	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC2D10.04	sty1	SPBC2D10.04	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037254239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759677	2541652	2539350	278148	275916	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC24B10.17	sty1	emp24	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.644446142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759678	2541652	2541117	278148	277632	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC646.13	sty1	sds23	phh1|spc1	moc1|psp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.877636806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759679	2541652	2540161	278148	276696	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC13E7.03c	sty1	SPBC13E7.03c	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.128255935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759680	2541652	2542492	278148	278951	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC1B9.02c	sty1	sck1	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.562702611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759681	2541652	5802945	278148	858083	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC19G12.16c	sty1	adg2	phh1|spc1	SPAC23A1.01c|mug46	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.063309827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759682	2541652	2540686	278148	277211	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC21D10.10	sty1	bdc1	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.41726983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759683	2541652	2539890	278148	276436	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC16C6.03c	sty1	SPBC16C6.03c	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51112806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759684	2541652	2542701	278148	279154	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC26H5.05	sty1	mga2	phh1|spc1	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.970561482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759685	2541652	2542103	278148	278579	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC31G5.11	sty1	pac2	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.766700348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759686	2541652	2540579	278148	277105	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC28E12.02	sty1	SPBC28E12.02	phh1|spc1	SPBC9B6.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.923442482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759687	2541652	2540491	278148	277019	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC28E12.04	sty1	SPBC28E12.04	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.752536054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759688	2541652	2542892	278148	279336	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC13F5.04c	sty1	vta1	phh1|spc1	SPAC13F5.04c|new6|SPAC13F5.08|vts1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580439639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759689	2541652	2540455	278148	276983	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC215.05	sty1	gpd1	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093116645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759690	2541652	2540535	278148	277062	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC215.01	sty1	SPBC215.01	phh1|spc1	SPBC3B9.20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189210101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759691	2541652	2539208	278148	275778	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC1450.11c	sty1	cek1	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.384696073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759692	2541652	2539332	278148	275898	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCPB1C11.01	sty1	amt1	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.777412827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759693	2541652	3361570	278148	280646	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC750.01	sty1	SPAC750.01	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153517552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759694	2541652	2541408	278148	277916	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBPB2B2.14c	sty1	SPBPB2B2.14c	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388685972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759695	2541652	2542677	278148	279130	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC26F1.10c	sty1	pyp1	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.175699076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759696	2541652	2541205	278148	277719	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC839.02	sty1	SPBC839.02	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.271358265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759697	2541652	2539443	278148	276006	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC736.02	sty1	SPCC736.02	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449199738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759698	2541652	2542273	278148	278742	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC17H9.13c	sty1	SPAC17H9.13c	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869387285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759699	2541652	2541058	278148	277573	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC3H7.09	sty1	erf2	phh1|spc1	mug142	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.561740763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759700	2541652	2541994	278148	278478	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC26A3.14c	sty1	SPAC26A3.14c	phh1|spc1	SPAC23A6.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.343164175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759701	2541652	2539564	278148	276125	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC550.12	sty1	arp6	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.319198047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759702	2541652	2539235	278148	275805	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC1682.15	sty1	mug122	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.196433232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759703	2541652	2540029	278148	276573	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC16A3.01	sty1	spn3	phh1|spc1	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.638271407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759704	2541652	2540945	278148	277461	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC342.06c	sty1	rtt109	phh1|spc1	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.834902479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759705	2541652	2541503	278148	278005	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC22A12.01c	sty1	pso2	phh1|spc1	SPAC56F8.17c|snm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.061453429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759706	2541652	2539331	278148	275897	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC24B10.09	sty1	rps1702	phh1|spc1	rps17|rps17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391918412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759707	2541652	2540160	278148	276695	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC1773.17c	sty1	SPBC1773.17c	phh1|spc1	SPBP26C9.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.19278375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759708	2541652	2539937	278148	276481	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC1539.08	sty1	arf6	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647332825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759709	2541652	2542012	278148	278495	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC23C11.02c	sty1	rps23	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.415344299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759710	2541652	2540676	278148	277201	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC3E7.11c	sty1	SPBC3E7.11c	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.472283704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759711	2541652	2540727	278148	277250	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC1921.03c	sty1	mex67	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.566829708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759712	2541652	2540425	278148	276953	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC27.06c	sty1	mgr2	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.480488322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759713	2541652	2542277	278148	278746	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC17A5.02c	sty1	dbr1	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.418881119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759714	2541652	2539792	278148	276342	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC1271.14	sty1	SPBC1271.14	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869584151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759715	2541652	2539823	278148	276373	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC16A3.18	sty1	cip1	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.564647908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759716	2541652	2540263	278148	276794	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC32H8.02c	sty1	nep2	phh1|spc1	mug120|pi021|SPACTOKYO_453.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.746084233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759717	2541652	2539244	278148	275814	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC1672.06c	sty1	asp1	phh1|spc1	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.052196822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759718	2541652	2538698	278148	275283	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC1442.02	sty1	SPCC1442.02	phh1|spc1	SPCC1450.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440986527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759719	2541652	2538866	278148	275446	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC1620.12c	sty1	SPCC1620.12c	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577563109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759720	2541652	2543584	278148	279999	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAPB1E7.11c	sty1	SPAPB1E7.11c	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.222076905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759721	2541652	2543426	278148	279846	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC631.02	sty1	bdf2	phh1|spc1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.163506074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759722	2541652	2541416	278148	277923	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBCPT2R1.01c	sty1	SPBCPT2R1.01c	phh1|spc1	SPBPB2B2.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.746188781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759723	2541652	2538972	278148	275546	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC1739.15	sty1	wtf21	phh1|spc1	wtf3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.328803457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759724	2541652	2538906	278148	275483	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC1259.03	sty1	rpa12	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.952020827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759725	2541652	2542213	278148	278687	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC3G6.13c	sty1	rpl4101	phh1|spc1	rpl41-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820886439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759726	2541652	2541021	278148	277536	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC3B8.10c	sty1	nem1	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.32634073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759727	2541652	2539310	278148	275877	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC285.17	sty1	spp27	phh1|spc1	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642820522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759728	2541652	2543573	278148	279988	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC869.11	sty1	cat1	phh1|spc1	SPAC922.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.06914033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759729	2541652	2542268	278148	278737	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC17A5.07c	sty1	ulp2	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640437237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759730	2541652	2539032	278148	275605	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC4B3.05c	sty1	hem12	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.646419052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759731	2541652	2539056	278148	275629	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC126.11c	sty1	SPCC126.11c	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767691924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759732	2541652	2539467	278148	276030	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC417.07c	sty1	mto1	phh1|spc1	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.332051022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759733	2541652	2539237	278148	275807	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC24B10.13	sty1	skb5	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.608560166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759734	2541652	3361461	278148	280537	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC11H11.01	sty1	sst6	phh1|spc1	cps23	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262449188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759735	2541652	2542695	278148	279148	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC12B10.09	sty1	pet801	phh1|spc1	SPAC12B10.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.740194995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759736	2541652	2539804	278148	276354	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC1105.11c	sty1	hht3	phh1|spc1	h3.3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987372702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759737	2541652	2541741	278148	278235	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC20G4.02c	sty1	fus1	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812554213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759738	2541652	2539870	278148	276416	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC1709.18	sty1	tif452	phh1|spc1	SPBC409.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875619041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759739	2541652	2540797	278148	277316	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC18H10.11c	sty1	ppr2	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.50682815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759740	2541652	2542484	278148	278944	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC1A6.07	sty1	sle1	phh1|spc1	SPAC1A6.07|seg1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.741958935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759741	2541652	2543593	278148	280008	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC4G9.10	sty1	arg3	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.818573763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759742	2541652	2538770	278148	275353	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC1753.02c	sty1	git3	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.272433472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759743	2541652	2541160	278148	277675	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC725.09c	sty1	hob3	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331730795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759744	2541652	2540922	278148	277438	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC36.10	sty1	SPBC36.10	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.829464675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759745	2541652	2538706	278148	275290	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC338.08	sty1	ctp1	phh1|spc1	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.045251468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759746	2541652	2542507	278148	278965	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC18G6.13	sty1	SPAC18G6.13	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.744099916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759747	2541652	2539046	278148	275619	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC1223.12c	sty1	meu10	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92721647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759748	2541652	2541192	278148	277706	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC83.17	sty1	SPBC83.17	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035680277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759749	2541652	2542971	278148	279410	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC105.02c	sty1	SPAC105.02c	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.624979154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759750	2541652	2542160	278148	278636	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC8C9.11	sty1	fra2	phh1|spc1	SPAC8C9.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.318157814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759751	2541652	2542464	278148	278925	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC1A6.09c	sty1	lag1	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.374639973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759752	2541652	2540363	278148	276892	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC2F12.09c	sty1	atf21	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.477412731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759753	2541652	2541578	278148	278075	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC25B8.05	sty1	deg1	phh1|spc1	SPAC25B8.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986206788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759754	2541652	2539219	278148	275789	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC1795.01c	sty1	mad3	phh1|spc1	SPCC895.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.316471815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759755	2541652	2542989	278148	279427	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC11E3.13c	sty1	gas5	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.123860881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759756	2541652	2541109	278148	277624	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC6B1.02	sty1	ppk30	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.917770171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759757	2541652	2542216	278148	278690	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC19A8.02	sty1	SPAC19A8.02	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992189073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759758	2541652	2539603	278148	276161	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC1289.06c	sty1	ppr8	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8739436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759759	2541652	2539689	278148	276244	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC1861.03	sty1	mak10	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818445696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759760	2541652	2543245	278148	279673	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC56F8.06c	sty1	alg10	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7757248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759761	2541652	2542651	278148	279105	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC24C9.12c	sty1	SPAC24C9.12c	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390689157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759762	2541652	2543643	278148	280057	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC3G9.07c	sty1	hos2	phh1|spc1	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.208224907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759763	2541652	2540801	278148	277320	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC18H10.10c	sty1	saf4	phh1|spc1	cwc16|cwf16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.128429394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759764	2541652	2540086	278148	276624	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC16H5.12c	sty1	SPBC16H5.12c	phh1|spc1	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.006019774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759765	2541652	2542902	278148	279346	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC144.05	sty1	SPAC144.05	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925150362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759766	2541652	2539111	278148	275683	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC417.11c	sty1	SPCC417.11c	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568954386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759767	2541652	2541710	278148	278205	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC343.11c	sty1	msc1	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323581493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759768	2541652	2543396	278148	279818	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC4D7.11	sty1	dsc4	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.409398944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759769	2541652	2539284	278148	275852	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC584.15c	sty1	SPCC584.15c	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.015043758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759770	2541652	2540326	278148	276856	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC2G5.06c	sty1	hmt2	phh1|spc1	cad1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928245234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759771	2541652	2539667	278148	276222	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC13G1.08c	sty1	ash2	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382804311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759772	2541652	2540665	278148	277190	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC83.02c	sty1	rpl4302	phh1|spc1	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.101234621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759773	2541652	2542710	278148	279163	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC750.08c	sty1	SPAC750.08c	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328280391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759774	2541652	2543244	278148	279672	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC6B12.06c	sty1	rrg9	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.071812113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759775	2541652	2539974	278148	276518	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC32H8.07	sty1	git5	phh1|spc1	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.764905646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759776	2541652	2541720	278148	278214	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC23H3.13c	sty1	gpa2	phh1|spc1	git8	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.717947135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759777	2541652	2538841	278148	275422	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC550.03c	sty1	SPCC550.03c	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.077758217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759778	2541652	2541241	278148	277755	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC887.17	sty1	SPBC887.17	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981290255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759779	2541652	2542254	278148	278724	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC30D11.04c	sty1	nup124	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.853499983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759780	2541652	2539408	278148	275973	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC576.12c	sty1	mhf2	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.314568493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759781	2541652	2539715	278148	276268	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC1778.09	sty1	SPBC1778.09	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.92029888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759782	2541652	2538708	278148	275292	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC594.01	sty1	SPCC594.01	phh1|spc1	SPCC736.16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.725324978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759783	2541652	2541536	278148	278036	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC1071.02	sty1	mms19	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.746800473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759784	2541652	2540201	278148	276734	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC13A2.04c	sty1	ptr2	phh1|spc1	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382524791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759785	2541652	2541053	278148	277568	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC56F2.10c	sty1	alg5	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.56614753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759786	2541652	2540599	278148	277125	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC29A3.10c	sty1	atp14	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.056977615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759787	2541652	2541296	278148	277808	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBP8B7.06	sty1	rpp201	phh1|spc1	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.764725136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759788	2541652	2539427	278148	275992	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC663.15c	sty1	SPCC663.15c	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.839424133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759789	2541652	2541186	278148	277700	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC725.01	sty1	SPBC725.01	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.032936668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759790	2541652	2543390	278148	279812	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC631.01c	sty1	acp2	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092817374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759791	2541652	2541680	278148	278176	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC22F8.09	sty1	rrp16	phh1|spc1	nop53	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.362668862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759792	2541652	2538884	278148	275462	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC1393.08	sty1	SPCC1393.08	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.628964513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759793	2541652	2539213	278148	275783	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC285.10c	sty1	SPCC285.10c	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040557401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759794	2541652	2539993	278148	276537	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC1105.05	sty1	exg1	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874733326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759795	2541652	2541337	278148	277848	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBP35G2.13c	sty1	swc2	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.333831834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759796	2541652	3361134	278148	280210	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC737.09c	sty1	hmt1	phh1|spc1	SPCC74.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.162000519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759797	2541652	2542781	278148	279230	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC57A10.12c	sty1	ura3	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.91090464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759798	2541652	2539527	278148	276089	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC338.16	sty1	pof3	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384261084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759799	2541652	2540930	278148	277446	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC354.10	sty1	def1	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.477983389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759800	2541652	2541742	278148	278236	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC22H10.09	sty1	SPAC22H10.09	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.993013725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759801	2541652	2541896	278148	278386	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC23H4.16c	sty1	SPAC23H4.16c	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036751233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759802	2541652	2542875	278148	279320	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC13G7.02c	sty1	ssa1	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.924309785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759803	2541652	2542725	278148	279176	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC3A12.10	sty1	rpl2001	phh1|spc1	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095576774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759804	2541652	2539538	278148	276100	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC364.06	sty1	nap1	phh1|spc1	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.761873306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759805	2541652	2543113	278148	279545	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC3F10.07c	sty1	erf4	phh1|spc1	mug91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.938261106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759806	2541652	2542198	278148	278673	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC6F12.09	sty1	rdp1	phh1|spc1	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.32420656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759807	2541652	2539686	278148	276241	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC1734.06	sty1	rhp18	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.620977204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759808	2541652	2540706	278148	277229	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC19C7.12c	sty1	omh1	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.746002039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759809	2541652	2538907	278148	275484	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC24B10.19c	sty1	nts1	phh1|spc1	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935424281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759810	2541652	2543391	278148	279813	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC4G9.09c	sty1	arg11	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.662816832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759811	2541652	2542286	278148	278754	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC1786.01c	sty1	ptl2	phh1|spc1	SPAC1786.01c|SPAC31G5.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.918026099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759812	2541652	2543670	278148	280084	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAPB1E7.06c	sty1	eme1	phh1|spc1	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.071086527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759813	2541652	2540498	278148	277026	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC27.02c	sty1	ask1	phh1|spc1	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.698888834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759814	2541652	2540779	278148	277298	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC19F8.06c	sty1	meu22	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.699953584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759815	2541652	2542881	278148	279326	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC13F5.03c	sty1	gld1	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.491392557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759816	2541652	5802917	278148	858055	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC17A2.14	sty1	SPAC17A2.14	phh1|spc1	SPAC17G6.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.384448796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759817	2541652	2543267	278148	279695	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC1002.12c	sty1	SPAC1002.12c	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046941613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759818	2541652	2542515	278148	278973	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC1952.09c	sty1	SPAC1952.09c	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.422840577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759819	2541652	2540800	278148	277319	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC409.20c	sty1	psh3	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.774140799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759820	2541652	2540152	278148	276688	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC12C2.03c	sty1	SPBC12C2.03c	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.886626313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759821	2541652	2543304	278148	279728	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC6B12.12	sty1	tom70	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.142479991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759822	2541652	2538717	278148	275301	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC1235.02	sty1	bio2	phh1|spc1	SPCC320.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.49716584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759823	2541652	2539159	278148	275731	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC1235.01	sty1	SPCC1235.01	phh1|spc1	SPCC320.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.056027607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759824	2541652	2542113	278148	278589	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC1B3.11c	sty1	ypt4	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.50619421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759825	2541652	2540464	278148	276992	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC23E6.02	sty1	rrp2	phh1|spc1	SPBC23E6.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.557723985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759826	2541652	2540600	278148	277126	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC4.05	sty1	mlo2	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.117316254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759827	2541652	2543066	278148	279499	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC343.12	sty1	rds1	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876620826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759828	2541652	2538756	278148	275339	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC1795.10c	sty1	SPCC1795.10c	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.566962694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759829	2541652	2541531	278148	278031	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC25A8.01c	sty1	fft3	phh1|spc1	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.483569432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759830	2541652	2539013	278148	275586	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC364.03	sty1	rpl1702	phh1|spc1	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378403932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759831	2541652	2540829	278148	277347	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC800.09	sty1	sum2	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.256759451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759832	2541652	2540164	278148	276699	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC1683.03c	sty1	SPBC1683.03c	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.508783686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759833	2541652	2542418	278148	278881	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC1805.07c	sty1	dad2	phh1|spc1	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.989482701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759834	2541652	2538692	278148	275277	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC162.04c	sty1	wtf13	phh1|spc1	wtf12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813573746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759835	2541652	2542042	278148	278523	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC23A1.14c	sty1	SPAC23A1.14c	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.692154314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759836	2541652	2540677	278148	277202	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC21B10.03c	sty1	ath1	phh1|spc1	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.226608387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759837	2541652	2539668	278148	276223	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC11B10.10c	sty1	pht1	phh1|spc1	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.334051991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759838	2541652	2541404	278148	277913	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBPB2B2.18	sty1	SPBPB2B2.18	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.557468729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759839	2541652	2541380	278148	277891	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBPB2B2.13	sty1	gal1	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.646676874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759840	2541652	2540516	278148	277044	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC21C3.01c	sty1	vps13a	phh1|spc1	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.846768364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759841	2541652	2541789	278148	278281	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC23H4.08	sty1	iwr1	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816202243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759842	2541652	2540182	278148	276715	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC16G5.06	sty1	SPBC16G5.06	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.506518218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759843	2541652	2543183	278148	279612	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC3A12.06c	sty1	SPAC3A12.06c	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.331858219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759844	2541652	2538795	278148	275376	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC1884.01	sty1	SPCC1884.01	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.558128705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759845	2541652	2542250	278148	278720	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC17D4.03c	sty1	cis4	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.807386886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759846	2541652	2539207	278148	275777	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC285.09c	sty1	cgs2	phh1|spc1	pde1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.513173326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759847	2541652	2539928	278148	276472	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC1604.08c	sty1	imp1	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769751197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759848	2541652	2543046	278148	279481	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC3C7.10	sty1	pex13	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.720946028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759849	2541652	2543044	278148	279479	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC3C7.12	sty1	tip1	phh1|spc1	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.553325252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759850	2541652	2540489	278148	277017	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC25H2.03	sty1	SPBC25H2.03	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.840106535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759851	2541652	2539205	278148	275775	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC4B3.15	sty1	mid1	phh1|spc1	dmf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.875188866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759852	2541652	2539726	278148	276278	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC13E7.08c	sty1	leo1	phh1|spc1	SPBC13E7.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990449708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759853	2541652	3361511	278148	280587	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC23C4.08	sty1	rho3	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.262176518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759854	2541652	2542904	278148	279348	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC144.11	sty1	rps1102	phh1|spc1	rps11|rps11-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.986179319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759855	2541652	2540380	278148	276909	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC1A4.05	sty1	blt1	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.295475127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759856	2541652	2543525	278148	279943	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC4A8.14	sty1	SPAC4A8.14	phh1|spc1	prs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.77011363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759857	2541652	2539375	278148	275941	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC4G3.11	sty1	mug154	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.568292615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759858	2541652	2543380	278148	279802	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC4G9.16c	sty1	rpl901	phh1|spc1	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382151602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759859	2541652	2538840	278148	275421	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC736.07c	sty1	SPCC736.07c	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.333854663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759860	2541652	2539189	278148	275760	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC1682.16	sty1	rpt4	phh1|spc1	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.084054681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759861	2541652	2541941	278148	278428	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC20H4.03c	sty1	tfs1	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.670436643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759862	2541652	2541084	278148	277599	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC649.02	sty1	rps1902	phh1|spc1	rps19|rps19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.805933761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759863	2541652	2539169	278148	275740	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC1235.11	sty1	mpc1	phh1|spc1	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.622650908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759864	2541652	2542716	278148	279169	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC25H1.07	sty1	emc1	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.275017222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759865	2541652	2543277	278148	279705	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC1002.03c	sty1	gls2	phh1|spc1	gls2alpha	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.348238998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759866	2541652	2541774	278148	278268	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC22E12.05c	sty1	rer1	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.264039874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759867	2541652	2539875	278148	276421	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC16A3.12c	sty1	SPBC16A3.12c	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.839023258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759868	2541652	2543387	278148	279809	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAPB1E7.02c	sty1	mcl1	phh1|spc1	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.347083443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759869	2541652	2538854	278148	275435	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCP1E11.05c	sty1	are2	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.701612903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759870	2541652	2539259	278148	275829	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC553.05c	sty1	wtf6	phh1|spc1	SPCC553.05c|SPCC553.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703176243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759871	2541652	3361517	278148	280593	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAP11E10.02c	sty1	mam3	phh1|spc1	SPAPB1A10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.272839992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759872	2541652	2542424	278148	278886	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC1805.14	sty1	SPAC1805.14	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706809274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759873	2541652	2541808	278148	278299	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC22A12.14c	sty1	SPAC22A12.14c	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514164146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759874	2541652	2543372	278148	279794	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAPB1A10.09	sty1	ase1	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.233742682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759875	2541652	2543644	278148	280058	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAPB1A10.03	sty1	nxt1	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.131968562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759876	2541652	2542280	278148	278748	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC1A6.06c	sty1	meu31	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.447726002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759877	2541652	2543448	278148	279868	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC3H5.07	sty1	rpl702	phh1|spc1	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.908928585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759878	2541652	2540309	278148	276839	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC21B10.13c	sty1	yox1	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.95274611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759879	2541652	2543624	278148	280038	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC4D7.06c	sty1	SPAC4D7.06c	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.437574183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759880	2541652	2542087	278148	278564	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC26F1.02	sty1	pnn1	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872442155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759881	2541652	2542073	278148	278550	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC26F1.01	sty1	sec74	phh1|spc1	SPAPJ691.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516552793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759882	2541652	2540208	278148	276741	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC9B6.03	sty1	SPBC9B6.03	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.162745085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759883	2541652	2541062	278148	277577	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC660.11	sty1	tcg1	phh1|spc1	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.130870278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759884	2541652	2538940	278148	275515	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC1620.07c	sty1	lnp1	phh1|spc1	SPCC1620.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.993222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759885	2541652	2542836	278148	279282	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC13G7.06	sty1	met16	phh1|spc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097112767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759886	2541652	2539033	278148	275606	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC1450.07c	sty1	dao1	phh1|spc1	SPCC1450.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808160068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759887	2541652	2540073	278148	276611	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC1539.07c	sty1	fmd1	phh1|spc1	SPBC1539.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.327012634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759888	2541652	2539001	278148	275575	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC1494.08c	sty1	SPCC1494.08c	phh1|spc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.126675968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759889	2542293	2539050	278761	275623	SPAC17G8.14c	SPCC11E10.08	pck1	rik1	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.086536671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759890	2542293	2542895	278761	279339	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC13G6.10c	pck1	asl1	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.774809394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759891	2542293	2541257	278761	277771	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBP23A10.14c	pck1	ell1	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.984870583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759892	2542293	2542143	278761	278619	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC17C9.07	pck1	alg8	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775829767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759893	2542293	2543064	278761	279497	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC3G6.01	pck1	hrp3	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.691639063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759894	2542293	2540161	278761	276696	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC13E7.03c	pck1	SPBC13E7.03c	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.693802926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759895	2542293	2540686	278761	277211	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC21D10.10	pck1	bdc1	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.481572752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759896	2542293	2542701	278761	279154	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC26H5.05	pck1	mga2	SPAC22H10.01c	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451869799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759897	2542293	2539970	278761	276514	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC1773.01	pck1	far8	SPAC22H10.01c	SPBC1773.01|csc3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.679716274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759898	2542293	2538847	278761	275428	SPAC17G8.14c	SPCC594.06c	pck1	SPCC594.06c	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390381811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759899	2542293	2541994	278761	278478	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC26A3.14c	pck1	SPAC26A3.14c	SPAC22H10.01c	SPAC23A6.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.070723064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759900	2542293	2542669	278761	279122	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC29B12.08	pck1	clr5	SPAC22H10.01c	SPAC29B12.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.225277662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759901	2542293	2540306	278761	276836	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC2G5.02c	pck1	ckb2	SPAC22H10.01c	SPBC2G5.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.893976279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759902	2542293	2541026	278761	277541	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC337.09	pck1	erg28	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.384322113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759903	2542293	2540993	278761	277509	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC342.01c	pck1	alg6	SPAC22H10.01c	SPBC3F6.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.68511854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759904	2542293	2543029	278761	279465	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC11G7.01	pck1	SPAC11G7.01	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.809973025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759905	2542293	2542969	278761	279409	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC4G8.10	pck1	gos1	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.429951803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759906	2542293	2539381	278761	275947	SPAC17G8.14c	SPCC1739.10	pck1	mug33	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.964278548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759907	2542293	2541021	278761	277536	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC3B8.10c	pck1	nem1	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503232855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759908	2542293	2542331	278761	278797	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC1834.05	pck1	alg9	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704625921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759909	2542293	2541379	278761	277890	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBP8B7.27	pck1	mug30	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7101901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759910	2542293	2539467	278761	276030	SPAC17G8.14c	SPCC417.07c	pck1	mto1	SPAC22H10.01c	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323250504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759911	2542293	2539237	278761	275807	SPAC17G8.14c	SPCC24B10.13	pck1	skb5	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.101337566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759912	2542293	2541801	278761	278292	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC2F7.08c	pck1	snf5	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.038533229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759913	2542293	2541249	278761	277763	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC947.01	pck1	alf1	SPAC22H10.01c	SPBC947.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647763294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759914	2542293	2541250	278761	277764	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC8D2.17	pck1	gmh4	SPAC22H10.01c	SPBC8D2.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.386640939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759915	2542293	2542513	278761	278971	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC1952.05	pck1	gcn5	SPAC22H10.01c	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.038551136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759916	2542293	2541038	278761	277553	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC29A10.01	pck1	ccr1	SPAC22H10.01c	SPBC365.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514741668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759917	2542293	2540673	278761	277198	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC1D7.03	pck1	mug80	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.061935462	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759918	2542293	2541166	278761	277681	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC725.15	pck1	ura5	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.613435564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759919	2542293	2539603	278761	276161	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC1289.06c	pck1	ppr8	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870288238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759920	2542293	2542857	278761	279303	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC144.06	pck1	apl5	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.508085836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759921	2542293	2540997	278761	277513	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC3H7.06c	pck1	pof9	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.304419907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759922	2542293	2541607	278761	278104	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC24B11.10c	pck1	cfh1	SPAC22H10.01c	chr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.631128216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759923	2542293	2538849	278761	275430	SPAC17G8.14c	SPCC330.14c	pck1	rpl2402	SPAC22H10.01c	rpl24-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808075452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759924	2542293	2540836	278761	277354	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC18H10.19	pck1	vps38	SPAC22H10.01c	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32994553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759925	2542293	2542254	278761	278724	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC30D11.04c	pck1	nup124	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.254884143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759926	2542293	2540327	278761	276857	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC31F10.07	pck1	lsb5	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.553371349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759927	2542293	2540019	278761	276563	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC1685.01	pck1	pmp1	SPAC22H10.01c	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.763676514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759928	2542293	2541053	278761	277568	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC56F2.10c	pck1	alg5	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.261649171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759929	2542293	2543517	278761	279935	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC3G9.05	pck1	spa2	SPAC22H10.01c	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.073546555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759930	2542293	2542773	278761	279222	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC16.01	pck1	rho2	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200930558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759931	2542293	2539303	278761	275871	SPAC17G8.14c	SPCC1020.09	pck1	gnr1	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.117263872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759932	2542293	2540229	278761	276761	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC31F10.15c	pck1	atp15	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986524582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759933	2542293	2539421	278761	275986	SPAC17G8.14c	SPCC794.11c	pck1	ent3	SPAC22H10.01c	SPCC794.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.78122501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759934	2542293	2541378	278761	277889	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBP8B7.21	pck1	ubp3	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.11905107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759935	2542293	3361134	278761	280210	SPAC17G8.14c	SPCC737.09c	pck1	hmt1	SPAC22H10.01c	SPCC74.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809078311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759936	2542293	2543515	278761	279933	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC4F10.14c	pck1	btf3	SPAC22H10.01c	btt1|egd1|nac2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.99148691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759937	2542293	2538762	278761	275345	SPAC17G8.14c	SPCC306.04c	pck1	set1	SPAC22H10.01c	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.76008277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759938	2542293	2539101	278761	275673	SPAC17G8.14c	SPCC736.04c	pck1	gma12	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.496065202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759939	2542293	2543619	278761	280033	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC4F10.04	pck1	ypa1	SPAC22H10.01c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.369484244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759940	2542293	2540619	278761	277145	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC25H2.15	pck1	SPBC25H2.15	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392582777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759941	2542293	2541175	278761	277689	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC839.13c	pck1	rpl1601	SPAC22H10.01c	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.160063127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759942	2542293	2540061	278761	276599	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC119.12	pck1	rud3	SPAC22H10.01c	SPBC119.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.131928667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759943	2542293	2541909	278761	278399	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC227.01c	pck1	erd1	SPAC22H10.01c	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.408405172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759944	2542293	2540498	278761	277026	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC27.02c	pck1	ask1	SPAC22H10.01c	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.164126489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759945	2542293	2539246	278761	275816	SPAC17G8.14c	SPCC18.13	pck1	SPCC18.13	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.939379176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759946	2542293	2541100	278761	277615	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC651.04	pck1	SPBC651.04	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.956962982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759947	2542293	2541367	278761	277878	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBP8B7.13	pck1	vac7	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378915158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759948	2542293	2542306	278761	278773	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC29A4.11	pck1	rga3	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388889532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759949	2542293	2543329	278761	279752	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC56F8.02	pck1	SPAC56F8.02	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.918608496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759950	2542293	2538692	278761	275277	SPAC17G8.14c	SPCC162.04c	pck1	wtf13	SPAC22H10.01c	wtf12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776812095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759951	2542293	2538916	278761	275493	SPAC17G8.14c	SPCC16C4.17	pck1	mug123	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.303888303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759952	2542293	2540677	278761	277202	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC21B10.03c	pck1	ath1	SPAC22H10.01c	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.759774907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759953	2542293	2540182	278761	276715	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC16G5.06	pck1	SPBC16G5.06	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.144736108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759954	2542293	2541744	278761	278238	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC23A1.02c	pck1	SPAC23A1.02c	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.286541711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759955	2542293	2539928	278761	276472	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC1604.08c	pck1	imp1	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.61715011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759956	2542293	2543516	278761	279934	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC4F10.11	pck1	spn1	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513175511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759957	2542293	2539205	278761	275775	SPAC17G8.14c	SPCC4B3.15	pck1	mid1	SPAC22H10.01c	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.481442117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759958	2542293	2539920	278761	276464	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC119.08	pck1	pmk1	SPAC22H10.01c	spm1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.505915849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759959	2542293	2540504	278761	277032	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC24C6.10c	pck1	dip1	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439433675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759960	2542293	2543384	278761	279806	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC637.06	pck1	gmh5	SPAC22H10.01c	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.699185248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759961	2542293	2541627	278761	278123	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC1F5.08c	pck1	yam8	SPAC22H10.01c	ehs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.961842663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759962	2542293	2542175	278761	278650	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC1F3.02c	pck1	mkh1	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.614032773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759963	2542293	2541869	278761	278359	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC22F3.13	pck1	tsc1	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.568110898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759964	2542293	2540383	278761	276912	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC31E1.02c	pck1	pmr1	SPAC22H10.01c	cps5|pgak2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.808511116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759965	2542293	2542617	278761	279071	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC13A11.01c	pck1	rga8	SPAC22H10.01c	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.46363853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759966	2542293	2539738	278761	276290	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC17G9.09	pck1	tif213	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.092071993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759967	2542293	2540787	278761	277306	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC1921.07c	pck1	sgf29	SPAC22H10.01c	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.982602303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759968	2542293	2540649	278761	277174	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC19F8.08	pck1	rps401	SPAC22H10.01c	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153625617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759969	2542378	2542207	278842	278682	SPAC1805.04	SPAC17H9.10c	nup132	ddb1	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.257063495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759970	2542378	2539050	278842	275623	SPAC1805.04	SPCC11E10.08	nup132	rik1	Nup133b	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816533528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759971	2542378	2540060	278842	276598	SPAC1805.04	SPBC106.01	nup132	mph1	Nup133b	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.588001918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759972	2542378	2541512	278842	278013	SPAC1805.04	SPAC11E3.08c	nup132	nse6	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.427348491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759973	2542378	2539582	278842	276141	SPAC1805.04	SPCC594.07c	nup132	bqt3	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.874876439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759974	2542378	2543592	278842	280007	SPAC1805.04	SPAC4F10.18	nup132	nup37	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.848218586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759975	2542378	2540528	278842	277056	SPAC1805.04	SPBC18H10.04c	nup132	sce3	Nup133b	tif48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.070316468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759976	2542378	2543339	278842	279762	SPAC1805.04	SPAC630.13c	nup132	tsc2	Nup133b	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.025451312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759977	2542378	2538993	278842	275567	SPAC1805.04	SPCC162.12	nup132	tco89	Nup133b	SPCC1753.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.030037459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759978	2542378	2541135	278842	277650	SPAC1805.04	SPBC839.03c	nup132	SPBC839.03c	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.351044588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759979	2542378	2542237	278842	278709	SPAC1805.04	SPAC19E9.02	nup132	fin1	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.669059876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759980	2542378	2540694	278842	277218	SPAC1805.04	SPBC19C7.10	nup132	bqt4	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.508043044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759981	2542378	2543164	278842	279595	SPAC1805.04	SPAC3G6.06c	nup132	rad2	Nup133b	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.346031905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759982	2542378	2540686	278842	277211	SPAC1805.04	SPBC21D10.10	nup132	bdc1	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.404130196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759983	2542378	2539201	278842	275772	SPAC1805.04	SPCC188.09c	nup132	pfl4	Nup133b	SPCC188.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.337502339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759984	2542378	2540664	278842	277189	SPAC1805.04	SPBC215.02	nup132	bob1	Nup133b	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.121695569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759985	2542378	2539420	278842	275985	SPAC1805.04	SPCC970.07c	nup132	raf2	Nup133b	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044285146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759986	2542378	2541208	278842	277722	SPAC1805.04	SPBC887.04c	nup132	lub1	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.942545795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759987	2542378	2541313	278842	277825	SPAC1805.04	SPBP26C9.02c	nup132	car1	Nup133b	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042172717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759988	2542378	2541058	278842	277573	SPAC1805.04	SPBC3H7.09	nup132	erf2	Nup133b	mug142	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092878306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759989	2542378	2539235	278842	275805	SPAC1805.04	SPCC1682.15	nup132	mug122	Nup133b	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872977579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759990	2542378	2538801	278842	275382	SPAC1805.04	SPCC285.13c	nup132	nup60	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.568653018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759991	2542378	2539434	278842	275997	SPAC1805.04	SPCC757.09c	nup132	rnc1	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.406719102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759992	2542378	2539575	278842	276135	SPAC1805.04	SPCP20C8.02c	nup132	SPCP20C8.02c	Nup133b	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.40590071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759993	2542378	2540929	278842	277445	SPAC1805.04	SPBC354.03	nup132	swd3	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.70613721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759994	2542378	2540727	278842	277250	SPAC1805.04	SPBC1921.03c	nup132	mex67	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05519174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759995	2542378	2542135	278842	278611	SPAC1805.04	SPAC13A11.04c	nup132	ubp8	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9897954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759996	2542378	2542318	278842	278784	SPAC1805.04	SPAC16C9.05	nup132	cph1	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.493476821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759997	2542378	2542277	278842	278746	SPAC1805.04	SPAC17A5.02c	nup132	dbr1	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.211653683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759998	2542378	2543685	278842	280099	SPAC1805.04	SPAC3C7.03c	nup132	rad55	Nup133b	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.414899931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
759999	2542378	2541580	278842	278077	SPAC1805.04	SPAC1687.05	nup132	pli1	Nup133b	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.158537844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760000	2542378	2539244	278842	275814	SPAC1805.04	SPCC1672.06c	nup132	asp1	Nup133b	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.37935327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760001	2542378	2543426	278842	279846	SPAC1805.04	SPAC631.02	nup132	bdf2	Nup133b	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576035079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760002	2542378	2538906	278842	275483	SPAC1805.04	SPCC1259.03	nup132	rpa12	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.975550466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760003	2542378	2542845	278842	279291	SPAC1805.04	SPAC824.04	nup132	SPAC824.04	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.55812576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760004	2542378	2540825	278842	277343	SPAC1805.04	SPBC428.08c	nup132	clr4	Nup133b	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.781761339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760005	2542378	2541926	278842	278414	SPAC1805.04	SPAC222.14c	nup132	SPAC222.14c	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.622265848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760006	2542378	2539023	278842	275596	SPAC1805.04	SPCC594.05c	nup132	spf1	Nup133b	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317561878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760007	2542378	2542036	278842	278518	SPAC1805.04	SPAC23A1.19c	nup132	hrq1	Nup133b	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.252318084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760008	2542378	2539467	278842	276030	SPAC1805.04	SPCC417.07c	nup132	mto1	Nup133b	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.841379022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760009	2542378	2542596	278842	279050	SPAC1805.04	SPAC1B3.17	nup132	clr2	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581242135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760010	2542378	2541250	278842	277764	SPAC1805.04	SPBC8D2.17	nup132	gmh4	Nup133b	SPBC8D2.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.330800949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760011	2542378	2543445	278842	279865	SPAC1805.04	SPAC4F10.13c	nup132	mpd2	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581597092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760012	2542378	2540647	278842	277172	SPAC1805.04	SPBC18H10.07	nup132	SPBC18H10.07	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.842686131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760013	2542378	2542463	278842	278924	SPAC1805.04	SPAC1834.03c	nup132	hhf1	Nup133b	h4.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.214304034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760014	2542378	2541160	278842	277675	SPAC1805.04	SPBC725.09c	nup132	hob3	Nup133b	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818075366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760015	2542378	2540429	278842	276957	SPAC1805.04	SPBC29A10.07	nup132	pom152	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.605924406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760016	2542378	2540352	278842	276881	SPAC1805.04	SPBC215.03c	nup132	csn1	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.01821233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760017	2542378	2543208	278842	279637	SPAC1805.04	SPAC328.04	nup132	SPAC328.04	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570911083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760018	2542378	2541496	278842	277998	SPAC1805.04	SPAC23D3.09	nup132	arp42	Nup133b	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.178364834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760019	2542378	2541166	278842	277681	SPAC1805.04	SPBC725.15	nup132	ura5	Nup133b	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035169716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760020	2542378	2538769	278842	275352	SPAC1805.04	SPCC126.04c	nup132	sgf73	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.203991311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760021	2542378	2539667	278842	276222	SPAC1805.04	SPBC13G1.08c	nup132	ash2	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049089604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760022	2542378	2539974	278842	276518	SPAC1805.04	SPBC32H8.07	nup132	git5	Nup133b	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.505984205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760023	2542378	2539232	278842	275802	SPAC1805.04	SPCC1223.04c	nup132	set11	Nup133b	mug76	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.576750764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760024	2542378	2542254	278842	278724	SPAC1805.04	SPAC30D11.04c	nup132	nup124	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.347832115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760025	2542378	2543080	278842	279513	SPAC1805.04	SPAC3A11.10c	nup132	SPAC3A11.10c	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.056534245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760026	2542378	2543443	278842	279863	SPAC1805.04	SPAC3H1.12c	nup132	snt2	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.824133105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760027	2542378	2541053	278842	277568	SPAC1805.04	SPBC56F2.10c	nup132	alg5	Nup133b	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931758843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760028	2542378	2540844	278842	277361	SPAC1805.04	SPBC1921.04c	nup132	SPBC1921.04c	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634107142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760029	2542378	2542255	278842	278725	SPAC1805.04	SPAC57A7.08	nup132	pzh1	Nup133b	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.477975647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760030	2542378	2540930	278842	277446	SPAC1805.04	SPBC354.10	nup132	def1	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.051452026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760031	2542378	2540691	278842	277216	SPAC1805.04	SPBC20F10.05	nup132	nrl1	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.079269671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760032	2542378	2538848	278842	275429	SPAC1805.04	SPCC613.12c	nup132	raf1	Nup133b	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.451264547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760033	2542378	2541762	278842	278256	SPAC1805.04	SPAC139.01c	nup132	SPAC139.01c	Nup133b	SPAC955.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.93684182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760034	2542378	2541713	278842	278208	SPAC1805.04	SPAC3A12.12	nup132	atp11	Nup133b	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.363528278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760035	2542378	2542725	278842	279176	SPAC1805.04	SPAC3A12.10	nup132	rpl2001	Nup133b	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.988414506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760036	2542378	2539908	278842	276454	SPAC1805.04	SPBC13E7.06	nup132	msd1	Nup133b	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197470747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760037	2542378	2538762	278842	275345	SPAC1805.04	SPCC306.04c	nup132	set1	Nup133b	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.537098067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760038	2542378	2540498	278842	277026	SPAC1805.04	SPBC27.02c	nup132	ask1	Nup133b	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.801444205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760039	2542378	2542940	278842	279381	SPAC1805.04	SPAC31A2.12	nup132	SPAC31A2.12	Nup133b	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04199266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760040	2542378	2539614	278842	276172	SPAC1805.04	SPBC17D11.08	nup132	SPBC17D11.08	Nup133b	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098836586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760041	2542378	2541531	278842	278031	SPAC1805.04	SPAC25A8.01c	nup132	fft3	Nup133b	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.288046228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760042	2542378	2541789	278842	278281	SPAC1805.04	SPAC23H4.08	nup132	iwr1	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.308419935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760043	2542378	2540927	278842	277443	SPAC1805.04	SPBC365.06	nup132	pmt3	Nup133b	smt3|ubl2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.700621863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760044	2542378	2539375	278842	275941	SPAC1805.04	SPCC4G3.11	nup132	mug154	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.476111657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760045	2542378	2540146	278842	276683	SPAC1805.04	SPBC17A3.06	nup132	SPBC17A3.06	Nup133b	pi040	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.166747657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760046	2542378	2539700	278842	276253	SPAC1805.04	SPBC1685.15c	nup132	klp6	Nup133b	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.485555541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760047	2542378	2543384	278842	279806	SPAC1805.04	SPAC637.06	nup132	gmh5	Nup133b	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.342663204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760048	2542378	2539531	278842	276093	SPAC1805.04	SPCC576.02	nup132	SPCC576.02	Nup133b	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92532255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760049	2542378	2543372	278842	279794	SPAC1805.04	SPAPB1A10.09	nup132	ase1	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.159536884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760050	2542378	2543644	278842	280058	SPAC1805.04	SPAPB1A10.03	nup132	nxt1	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.479459346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760051	2542378	2542440	278842	278902	SPAC1805.04	SPAC17A2.12	nup132	rrp1	Nup133b	SPAC17A2.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.883851834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760052	2542378	2542617	278842	279071	SPAC1805.04	SPAC13A11.01c	nup132	rga8	Nup133b	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581405106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760053	2542378	2538730	278842	275314	SPAC1805.04	SPCC31H12.02c	nup132	mug73	Nup133b	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.709739141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760054	2540251	2542207	276783	278682	SPBC336.05c	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC336.05c	ddb1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.123049092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760055	2540251	2541235	276783	277749	SPBC336.05c	SPBC8D2.12c	SPBC336.05c	SPBC8D2.12c	-	pI053	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326793248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760056	2540251	2542555	276783	279012	SPBC336.05c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC336.05c	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.07459534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760057	2540251	2539937	276783	276481	SPBC336.05c	SPBC1539.08	SPBC336.05c	arf6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865486539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760058	2540251	2540892	276783	277408	SPBC336.05c	SPBC530.01	SPBC336.05c	gyp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815522388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760059	2540251	2542469	276783	278930	SPBC336.05c	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC336.05c	erg5	-	cyp61	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.843809823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760060	2540251	2542398	276783	278862	SPBC336.05c	SPAC1805.03c	SPBC336.05c	trm13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.399347481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760061	2540251	2540599	276783	277125	SPBC336.05c	SPBC29A3.10c	SPBC336.05c	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322861968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760062	2540251	2543391	276783	279813	SPBC336.05c	SPAC4G9.09c	SPBC336.05c	arg11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986117864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760063	2540251	2543275	276783	279703	SPBC336.05c	SPAC1002.05c	SPBC336.05c	jmj2	-	kdm5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.890970308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760064	2540251	2542418	276783	278881	SPBC336.05c	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC336.05c	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708182123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760065	2540251	2539998	276783	276542	SPBC336.05c	SPBC16G5.03	SPBC336.05c	SPBC16G5.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.484421686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760066	2540251	2540067	276783	276605	SPBC336.05c	SPBC16H5.05c	SPBC336.05c	cyp7	-	cwf27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.946691643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760067	3361491	2543524	280567	279942	SPAC1805.08	SPAC4D7.07c	dlc1	csi2	-	SPAC4D7.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.400290308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760068	3361491	2540686	280567	277211	SPAC1805.08	SPBC21D10.10	dlc1	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.593654176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760069	3361491	2538922	280567	275499	SPAC1805.08	SPCC16C4.10	dlc1	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.362645314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760070	3361491	2540929	280567	277445	SPAC1805.08	SPBC354.03	dlc1	swd3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.819802102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760071	3361491	2540825	280567	277343	SPAC1805.08	SPBC428.08c	dlc1	clr4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037649925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760072	3361491	2542268	280567	278737	SPAC1805.08	SPAC17A5.07c	dlc1	ulp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.793212779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760073	3361491	2542177	280567	278652	SPAC1805.08	SPAC17H9.08	dlc1	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.467727629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760074	3361491	2542032	280567	278514	SPAC1805.08	SPAC23C11.04c	dlc1	pnk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.494385004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760075	3361491	2543390	280567	279812	SPAC1805.08	SPAC631.01c	dlc1	acp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.196244207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760076	3361491	2543515	280567	279933	SPAC1805.08	SPAC4F10.14c	dlc1	btf3	-	btt1|egd1|nac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.901652033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760077	3361491	2541798	280567	278289	SPAC1805.08	SPAC22F3.03c	dlc1	rdh54	-	mug34|tid1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.855984642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760078	3361491	2543619	280567	280033	SPAC1805.08	SPAC4F10.04	dlc1	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.456086993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760079	3361491	2540498	280567	277026	SPAC1805.08	SPBC27.02c	dlc1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386171861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760080	3361491	2539205	280567	275775	SPAC1805.08	SPCC4B3.15	dlc1	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.578675756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760081	3361491	2542175	280567	278650	SPAC1805.08	SPAC1F3.02c	dlc1	mkh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.744696769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760082	2539737	2542207	276289	278682	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC17H9.10c	nrm1	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.81867863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760083	2539737	2540279	276289	276810	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC3B8.04c	nrm1	SPBC3B8.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.066937588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760084	2539737	2539841	276289	276389	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC17D1.05	nrm1	SPBC17D1.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.786680485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760085	2539737	2540942	276289	277458	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC3H7.14	nrm1	mug176	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.149968436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760086	2539737	2542598	276289	279052	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC6G10.08	nrm1	idp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816925766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760087	2539737	2543634	276289	280048	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC3H8.04	nrm1	SPAC3H8.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81282727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760088	2539737	2542372	276289	278836	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC1F3.03	nrm1	SPAC1F3.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567654783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760089	2539737	2542066	276289	278543	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC227.05	nrm1	SPAC227.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.936810161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760090	2539737	2541818	276289	278309	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC11G7.02	nrm1	pub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.614840068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760091	2539737	2543064	276289	279497	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC3G6.01	nrm1	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.685684269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760092	2539737	2542378	276289	278842	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC1805.04	nrm1	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.668033588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760093	2539737	2541135	276289	277650	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC839.03c	nrm1	SPBC839.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.442858672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760094	2539737	2541856	276289	278347	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC23H3.08c	nrm1	bub3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384583058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760095	2539737	2541117	276289	277632	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC646.13	nrm1	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.275025166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760096	2539737	2540161	276289	276696	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC13E7.03c	nrm1	SPBC13E7.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.729559713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760097	2539737	2542502	276289	278960	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC139.06	nrm1	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.836235863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760098	2539737	2539196	276289	275767	SPBC16A3.07c	SPCC1795.03	nrm1	gms1	-	gmn3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.425437257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760099	2539737	2541633	276289	278129	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC664.01c	nrm1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.551179134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760100	2539737	2542758	276289	279208	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC15E1.02c	nrm1	SPAC15E1.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.765617506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760101	2539737	2543434	276289	279854	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC8F11.02c	nrm1	dph3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.709773717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760102	2539737	2540686	276289	277211	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC21D10.10	nrm1	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.527600361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760103	2539737	2541082	276289	277597	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC577.11	nrm1	SPBC577.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.958171925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760104	2539737	2539210	276289	275780	SPBC16A3.07c	SPCC2H8.05c	nrm1	dbl1	-	SPCC2H8.05c|SPCC63.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.651430515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760105	2539737	2540999	276289	277515	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC4B4.04	nrm1	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.912742717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760106	2539737	2539226	276289	275796	SPBC16A3.07c	SPCC16C4.20c	nrm1	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.137143362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760107	2539737	2541951	276289	278438	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC222.05c	nrm1	mss1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.490150811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760108	2539737	2540979	276289	277495	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC3H7.10	nrm1	elp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.887239845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760109	2539737	2538775	276289	275357	SPBC16A3.07c	SPCC23B6.05c	nrm1	ssb3	-	rpa3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.783752223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760110	2539737	2538801	276289	275382	SPBC16A3.07c	SPCC285.13c	nrm1	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.958825558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760111	2539737	2540313	276289	276843	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC337.04	nrm1	ppk27	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.214911686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760112	2539737	2540220	276289	276753	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC337.03	nrm1	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.913016391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760113	2539737	2540929	276289	277445	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC354.03	nrm1	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.345730281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760114	2539737	2539988	276289	276532	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC1271.05c	nrm1	SPBC1271.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927091693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760115	2539737	2542165	276289	278641	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC1782.08c	nrm1	rex3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.861726196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760116	2539737	2541323	276289	277835	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBP35G2.14	nrm1	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.8920901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760117	2539737	2540425	276289	276953	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC27.06c	nrm1	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.791040464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760118	2539737	2542135	276289	278611	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC13A11.04c	nrm1	ubp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.395354499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760119	2539737	2541424	276289	277929	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC23G3.04	nrm1	ies4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.755305227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760120	2539737	2542318	276289	278784	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC16C9.05	nrm1	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.277506796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760121	2539737	2542023	276289	278506	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC20H4.10	nrm1	ufd2	-	SPAC145.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.234362229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760122	2539737	2543595	276289	280010	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC4G9.11c	nrm1	cmb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.107808455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760123	2539737	2541105	276289	277620	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC685.02	nrm1	exo5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.13006496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760124	2539737	2539244	276289	275814	SPBC16A3.07c	SPCC1672.06c	nrm1	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.120735637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760125	2539737	2543563	276289	279979	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC664.02c	nrm1	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.49972336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760126	2539737	2541522	276289	278023	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC23E2.01	nrm1	fep1	-	gaf2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.794643774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760127	2539737	2542253	276289	278723	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC17H9.04c	nrm1	SPAC17H9.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.523554602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760128	2539737	2542845	276289	279291	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC824.04	nrm1	SPAC824.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.450287629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760129	2539737	2542981	276289	279419	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC824.02	nrm1	bst1	-	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.558216492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760130	2539737	2541021	276289	277536	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC3B8.10c	nrm1	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.467668458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760131	2539737	2542554	276289	279011	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC1952.03	nrm1	otu2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.089262872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760132	2539737	2539023	276289	275596	SPBC16A3.07c	SPCC594.05c	nrm1	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.472419324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760133	2539737	2539467	276289	276030	SPBC16A3.07c	SPCC417.07c	nrm1	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.600860249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760134	2539737	2543514	276289	279932	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC4D7.03	nrm1	pop2	-	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.421474561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760135	2539737	2538876	276289	275455	SPBC16A3.07c	SPCC4B3.02c	nrm1	SPCC4B3.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.667019921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760136	2539737	2542950	276289	279390	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC12B10.03	nrm1	bun62	-	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.549335733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760137	2539737	2541741	276289	278235	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC20G4.02c	nrm1	fus1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.616680771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760138	2539737	2540894	276289	277410	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC530.04	nrm1	mod5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.89777067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760139	2539737	2541776	276289	278270	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC23H3.05c	nrm1	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.146773544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760140	2539737	2542249	276289	278719	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC30D11.14c	nrm1	SPAC30D11.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.557199913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760141	2539737	2543483	276289	279903	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAPB2B4.02	nrm1	grx5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.314470952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760142	2539737	2542123	276289	278599	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC18G6.15	nrm1	mal3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.462500436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760143	2539737	2538706	276289	275290	SPBC16A3.07c	SPCC338.08	nrm1	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.756293773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760144	2539737	2543412	276289	279834	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC637.07	nrm1	moe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.509371654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760145	2539737	2540673	276289	277198	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC1D7.03	nrm1	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.843307491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760146	2539737	2543208	276289	279637	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC328.04	nrm1	SPAC328.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.969517612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760147	2539737	2541876	276289	278366	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAP27G11.11c	nrm1	SPAP27G11.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.982338505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760148	2539737	2542873	276289	279318	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC9G1.02	nrm1	wis4	-	wak1|wik1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.858948208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760149	2539737	2539999	276289	276543	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC1734.15	nrm1	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.144424633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760150	2539737	2542452	276289	278913	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC1D4.02c	nrm1	SPAC1D4.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.062029056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760151	2539737	2543246	276289	279674	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAPB8E5.05	nrm1	mfm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.218716647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760152	2539737	2541352	276289	277863	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBPJ4664.03	nrm1	mfm3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.630249039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760153	2539737	2540452	276289	276980	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC2A9.11c	nrm1	iss9	-	SPBC2A9.11c|SPBC2D10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.58536547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760154	2539737	2538994	276289	275568	SPBC16A3.07c	SPCC553.01c	nrm1	dbl2	-	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.36058591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760155	2539737	2541532	276289	278032	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC2C4.15c	nrm1	ubx2	-	ucp13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.974692413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760156	2539737	2542193	276289	278668	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC9G1.11c	nrm1	spn4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319447537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760157	2539737	2538890	276289	275468	SPBC16A3.07c	SPCC1393.02c	nrm1	spt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380369353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760158	2539737	2540086	276289	276624	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC16H5.12c	nrm1	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.457935094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760159	2539737	2540231	276289	276763	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC336.14c	nrm1	ppk26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980411672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760160	2539737	3361269	276289	280345	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC31A8.01c	nrm1	rtn1	-	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.133417548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760161	2539737	2542032	276289	278514	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC23C11.04c	nrm1	pnk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.804876611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760162	2539737	2542710	276289	279163	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC750.08c	nrm1	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.905402053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760163	2539737	2543244	276289	279672	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC6B12.06c	nrm1	rrg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.513555391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760164	2539737	2540224	276289	276757	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC32H8.06	nrm1	mug93	-	pi018|SPACTOKYO_453.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.587041631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760165	2539737	2540077	276289	276615	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC17D11.04c	nrm1	nto1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.760160942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760166	2539737	2543378	276289	279800	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC3H8.07c	nrm1	pac10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.884175251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760167	2539737	2542254	276289	278724	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC30D11.04c	nrm1	nup124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.891544265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760168	2539737	2541900	276289	278390	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC23H4.17c	nrm1	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.410946236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760169	2539737	2542867	276289	279312	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC343.16	nrm1	lys2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.722583241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760170	2539737	2542855	276289	279301	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC144.04c	nrm1	spe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.500349164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760171	2539737	2542519	276289	278977	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC19G12.08	nrm1	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.07506343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760172	2539737	2543080	276289	279513	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC3A11.10c	nrm1	SPAC3A11.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.474712229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760173	2539737	2542056	276289	278535	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC6G9.14	nrm1	SPAC6G9.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.775208115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760174	2539737	2539348	276289	275914	SPBC16A3.07c	SPCC18B5.07c	nrm1	nup61	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.740319277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760175	2539737	2543517	276289	279935	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC3G9.05	nrm1	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.809466176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760176	2539737	2541614	276289	278111	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC29A4.20	nrm1	elp3	-	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.129057743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760177	2539737	2542255	276289	278725	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC57A7.08	nrm1	pzh1	-	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709614632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760178	2539737	2542781	276289	279230	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC57A10.12c	nrm1	ura3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.10219667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760179	2539737	2543515	276289	279933	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC4F10.14c	nrm1	btf3	-	btt1|egd1|nac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389666906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760180	2539737	2540930	276289	277446	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC354.10	nrm1	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.179544435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760181	2539737	2539519	276289	276081	SPBC16A3.07c	SPCC364.05	nrm1	vps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197329363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760182	2539737	2538848	276289	275429	SPBC16A3.07c	SPCC613.12c	nrm1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.883252018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760183	2539737	2541017	276289	277532	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC36.07	nrm1	elp1	-	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.460456048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760184	2539737	2540918	276289	277434	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC800.02	nrm1	whi5	-	mug54	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.924089596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760185	2539737	2540821	276289	277339	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC800.03	nrm1	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.685209965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760186	2539737	2540910	276289	277426	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC577.02	nrm1	rpl3801	-	rpl38-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.062395607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760187	2539737	2541786	276289	278278	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC22F3.08c	nrm1	rok1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38135835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760188	2539737	2538762	276289	275345	SPBC16A3.07c	SPCC306.04c	nrm1	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.014636106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760189	2539737	2542516	276289	278974	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC2F7.04	nrm1	pmc2	-	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.332549833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760190	2539737	2539555	276289	276116	SPBC16A3.07c	SPCC4B3.08	nrm1	lsg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.550071512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760191	2539737	2542327	276289	278793	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC16C9.06c	nrm1	upf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.363033081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760192	2539737	2542767	276289	279217	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC1565.07c	nrm1	knd1	-	SPAC1565.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.765305816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760193	2539737	2543071	276289	279504	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC3C7.06c	nrm1	pit1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.695179635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760194	2539737	2541175	276289	277689	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC839.13c	nrm1	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.998453388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760195	2539737	2540044	276289	276582	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC1778.04	nrm1	spo6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.309800568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760196	2539737	2543304	276289	279728	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC6B12.12	nrm1	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.419079479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760197	2539737	2542541	276289	278998	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC1B3.03c	nrm1	wis2	-	cyp5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.922666314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760198	2539737	2543662	276289	280076	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC9.07c	nrm1	SPAC9.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.433574589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760199	2539737	2542458	276289	278919	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC30.02c	nrm1	SPAC30.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.907203058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760200	2539737	2539013	276289	275586	SPBC16A3.07c	SPCC364.03	nrm1	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442797861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760201	2539737	2540007	276289	276551	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC16D10.05	nrm1	mok13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.199914679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760202	2539737	2542418	276289	278881	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC1805.07c	nrm1	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.564387367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760203	2539737	2540677	276289	277202	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC21B10.03c	nrm1	ath1	-	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.948651845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760204	2539737	2543420	276289	279842	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC3H1.04c	nrm1	mdm31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.580521087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760205	2539737	2540928	276289	277444	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC3E7.10	nrm1	fma1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.580989655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760206	2539737	2540927	276289	277443	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC365.06	nrm1	pmt3	-	smt3|ubl2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570952316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760207	2539737	2543633	276289	280047	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC3H8.05c	nrm1	mms1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.151492119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760208	2539737	2540936	276289	277452	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC800.05c	nrm1	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.374466681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760209	2539737	2543044	276289	279479	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC3C7.12	nrm1	tip1	-	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.703203863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760210	2539737	2543516	276289	279934	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC4F10.11	nrm1	spn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.062496833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760211	2539737	3361511	276289	280587	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC23C4.08	nrm1	rho3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.33464989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760212	2539737	2539375	276289	275941	SPBC16A3.07c	SPCC4G3.11	nrm1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.312151708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760213	2539737	2539178	276289	275749	SPBC16A3.07c	SPCC1682.14	nrm1	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.182969622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760214	2539737	2542021	276289	278504	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAP14E8.02	nrm1	tos4	-	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.550965036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760215	2539737	2542059	276289	278537	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC328.06	nrm1	ubp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.808022118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760216	2539737	2540108	276289	276645	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC13E7.11	nrm1	rbd1	-	SPBC13E7.11|rh1|SPBC30D10.19c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.290554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760217	2539737	2541806	276289	278297	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC4G8.13c	nrm1	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.479782984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760218	2539737	2543327	276289	279750	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC1D4.06c	nrm1	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.39042253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760219	2539737	2541627	276289	278123	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC1F5.08c	nrm1	yam8	-	ehs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.19747333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760220	2539737	2541778	276289	278271	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC23G3.05c	nrm1	SPAC23G3.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.297834263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760221	2539737	2541491	276289	277993	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC2C4.16c	nrm1	rps801	-	rps8|rps8-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.094722266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760222	2539737	2542111	276289	278587	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC1687.14c	nrm1	SPAC1687.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.811296685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760223	2539737	2543448	276289	279868	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC3H5.07	nrm1	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.682923797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760224	2539737	2542656	276289	279110	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC2E1P3.05c	nrm1	SPAC2E1P3.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.039761579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760225	2539737	2543237	276289	279665	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC6B12.02c	nrm1	mus7	-	mms22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.362848465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760226	2539737	2543472	276289	279892	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC959.04c	nrm1	omh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.502382366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760227	2539737	2542680	276289	279133	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC26F1.09	nrm1	gyp51	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.777902353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760228	2539737	2542609	276289	279063	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC31G5.04	nrm1	lys12	-	SPAC31G5.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.345383793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760229	2539737	2540736	276289	277259	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC19F8.02	nrm1	SPBC19F8.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.63110777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760230	2541556	2539434	278055	275997	SPAC6G9.10c	SPCC757.09c	sen1	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.116882455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760231	2541556	2539574	278055	276134	SPAC6G9.10c	SPCPB16A4.04c	sen1	trm8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1346074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760232	2541556	2542964	278055	279404	SPAC6G9.10c	SPAC12G12.07c	sen1	SPAC12G12.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.144063304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760233	2541556	2540338	278055	276867	SPAC6G9.10c	SPBC2G2.13c	sen1	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.374169092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760234	2541556	2540546	278055	277073	SPAC6G9.10c	SPBC25B2.06c	sen1	btb2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.485559233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760235	2541556	2540352	278055	276881	SPAC6G9.10c	SPBC215.03c	sen1	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.633269238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760236	2541556	2538769	278055	275352	SPAC6G9.10c	SPCC126.04c	sen1	sgf73	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387384721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760237	2541556	2542519	278055	278977	SPAC6G9.10c	SPAC19G12.08	sen1	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.625085893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760238	2541556	2541536	278055	278036	SPAC6G9.10c	SPAC1071.02	sen1	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323982351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760239	2541556	2540201	278055	276734	SPAC6G9.10c	SPBC13A2.04c	sen1	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.654889324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760240	2541556	2539354	278055	275920	SPAC6G9.10c	SPCC4F11.03c	sen1	SPCC4F11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.693472264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760241	2541556	2542327	278055	278793	SPAC6G9.10c	SPAC16C9.06c	sen1	upf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.140325141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760242	2541556	2539246	278055	275816	SPAC6G9.10c	SPCC18.13	sen1	SPCC18.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.991644466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760243	2541556	2540346	278055	276875	SPAC6G9.10c	SPBC2F12.03c	sen1	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.083892627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760244	2541556	2541789	278055	278281	SPAC6G9.10c	SPAC23H4.08	sen1	iwr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.196192203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760245	2541556	2543087	278055	279520	SPAC6G9.10c	SPAC30C2.04	sen1	SPAC30C2.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.49189455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760246	2541556	2540208	278055	276741	SPAC6G9.10c	SPBC9B6.03	sen1	SPBC9B6.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.19328382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760247	2540995	2540131	277511	276668	SPBC337.16	SPBC1778.05c	cho1	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.443068031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760248	2540995	2543575	277511	279990	SPBC337.16	SPAC644.13c	cho1	SPAC644.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.143270668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760249	2540995	2541801	277511	278292	SPBC337.16	SPAC2F7.08c	cho1	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.595068339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760250	2540995	2539845	277511	276393	SPBC337.16	SPBC12C2.02c	cho1	ste20	-	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.703146765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760251	2540995	2541496	277511	277998	SPBC337.16	SPAC23D3.09	cho1	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.209099697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760252	2540995	2540599	277511	277125	SPBC337.16	SPBC29A3.10c	cho1	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.255617764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760253	2540995	2538762	277511	275345	SPBC337.16	SPCC306.04c	cho1	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041265861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760254	2540995	2541531	277511	278031	SPBC337.16	SPAC25A8.01c	cho1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.658804944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760255	2540995	2539729	277511	276281	SPBC337.16	SPBC11B10.07c	cho1	ivn1	-	pi004|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451607951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760256	2540995	2542826	277511	279273	SPBC337.16	SPAC13G6.09	cho1	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317426227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760257	2540995	2543380	277511	279802	SPBC337.16	SPAC4G9.16c	cho1	rpl901	-	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.50920737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760258	2540995	2542716	277511	279169	SPBC337.16	SPAC25H1.07	cho1	emc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580291119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760259	2540995	2541806	277511	278297	SPBC337.16	SPAC4G8.13c	cho1	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.853904227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760260	2540995	2539731	277511	276283	SPBC337.16	SPBC1271.09	cho1	SPBC1271.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.607029283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760261	2541498	2540235	278000	276767	SPAC227.10	SPBC336.13c	SPAC227.10	SPBC336.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.753547656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760262	2541498	2542237	278000	278709	SPAC227.10	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC227.10	fin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701658034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760263	2541498	2542701	278000	279154	SPAC227.10	SPAC26H5.05	SPAC227.10	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.317260831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760264	2541498	2538976	278000	275550	SPAC227.10	SPCC1840.04	SPAC227.10	pca1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.83732921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760265	2541498	2541964	278000	278450	SPAC227.10	SPAC2F3.08	SPAC227.10	sut1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.20780738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760266	2541498	2539603	278000	276161	SPAC227.10	SPBC1289.06c	SPAC227.10	ppr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330302541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760267	2541498	2540498	278000	277026	SPAC227.10	SPBC27.02c	SPAC227.10	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.010216195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760268	2541498	2542401	278000	278865	SPAC227.10	SPAC1142.02c	SPAC227.10	SPAC1142.02c	-	SPAC17G6.19c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709336837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760269	2541498	2541531	278000	278031	SPAC227.10	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC227.10	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.695557161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760270	2541498	2542418	278000	278881	SPAC227.10	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC227.10	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.815157463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760271	2541498	2543372	278000	279794	SPAC227.10	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC227.10	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.831608841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760272	2542309	2542895	278775	279339	SPAC16A10.02	SPAC13G6.10c	sub1	asl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809927218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760273	2542309	2543527	278775	279945	SPAC16A10.02	SPAC4C5.01	sub1	SPAC4C5.01	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.120654732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760274	2542309	2541208	278775	277722	SPAC16A10.02	SPBC887.04c	sub1	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979886905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760275	2542309	2542569	278775	279025	SPAC16A10.02	SPAC186.08c	sub1	SPAC186.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504768721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760276	2542309	2542331	278775	278797	SPAC16A10.02	SPAC1834.05	sub1	alg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567974999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760277	2542309	2540673	278775	277198	SPAC16A10.02	SPBC1D7.03	sub1	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.303533141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760278	2542309	2541713	278775	278208	SPAC16A10.02	SPAC3A12.12	sub1	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985936964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760279	2542309	2541806	278775	278297	SPAC16A10.02	SPAC4G8.13c	sub1	prz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.112038737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760280	2539035	2543064	275608	279497	SPCC794.09c	SPAC3G6.01	tef101	hrp3	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.60483925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760281	2539035	2540999	275608	277515	SPCC794.09c	SPBC4B4.04	tef101	SPBC4B4.04	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.319767744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760282	2539035	2542135	275608	278611	SPCC794.09c	SPAC13A11.04c	tef101	ubp8	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930358674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760283	2539035	2542318	275608	278784	SPCC794.09c	SPAC16C9.05	tef101	cph1	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.225000495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760284	2539035	2541801	275608	278292	SPCC794.09c	SPAC2F7.08c	tef101	snf5	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.033079543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760285	2539035	2542019	275608	278502	SPCC794.09c	SPAC23A1.17	tef101	SPAC23A1.17	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.588223945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760286	2539035	2542469	275608	278930	SPCC794.09c	SPAC19A8.04	tef101	erg5	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	cyp61	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.645182204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760287	2539035	2543396	275608	279818	SPCC794.09c	SPAC4D7.11	tef101	dsc4	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.470999183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760288	2539035	2541614	275608	278111	SPCC794.09c	SPAC29A4.20	tef101	elp3	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.045263445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760289	2539035	2542973	275608	279412	SPCC794.09c	SPAC10F6.04	tef101	SPAC10F6.04	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.458976066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760290	2539035	2542516	275608	278974	SPCC794.09c	SPAC2F7.04	tef101	pmc2	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	med1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.829281321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760291	2539035	2543619	275608	280033	SPCC794.09c	SPAC4F10.04	tef101	ypa1	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.335888673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760292	2539035	2541175	275608	277689	SPCC794.09c	SPBC839.13c	tef101	rpl1601	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.406057061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760293	2539035	2543304	275608	279728	SPCC794.09c	SPAC6B12.12	tef101	tom70	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.613497752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760294	2539035	2539246	275608	275816	SPCC794.09c	SPCC18.13	tef101	SPCC18.13	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.534818845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760295	2539035	2539668	275608	276223	SPCC794.09c	SPBC11B10.10c	tef101	pht1	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.186771583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760296	2539035	2542021	275608	278504	SPCC794.09c	SPAP14E8.02	tef101	tos4	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386641738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760297	2539035	2543087	275608	279520	SPCC794.09c	SPAC30C2.04	tef101	SPAC30C2.04	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.395412453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760298	2539035	2542175	275608	278650	SPCC794.09c	SPAC1F3.02c	tef101	mkh1	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.849722086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760299	2540745	2540929	277268	277445	SPBC21C3.18	SPBC354.03	spo4	swd3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.820747768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760300	2540745	2539993	277268	276537	SPBC21C3.18	SPBC1105.05	spo4	exg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571499687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760301	2540745	2539205	277268	275775	SPBC21C3.18	SPCC4B3.15	spo4	mid1	-	dmf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877188199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760302	2540337	2540910	276866	277426	SPBC28F2.11	SPBC577.02	hmo1	rpl3801	SPBC28F2.11	rpl38-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442246774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760303	2539665	2542969	276220	279409	SPBC1604.19c	SPAC4G8.10	trs8501	gos1	SPBC1604.19c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323711141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760304	2539665	2541246	276220	277760	SPBC1604.19c	SPBC8E4.02c	trs8501	SPBC8E4.02c	SPBC1604.19c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.804934897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760305	2539665	2541339	276220	277850	SPBC1604.19c	SPBP4G3.02	trs8501	pho1	SPBC1604.19c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780370709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760306	2539665	2539603	276220	276161	SPBC1604.19c	SPBC1289.06c	trs8501	ppr8	SPBC1604.19c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504870142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760307	2539665	2539354	276220	275920	SPBC1604.19c	SPCC4F11.03c	trs8501	SPCC4F11.03c	SPBC1604.19c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635547088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760308	2539665	2539488	276220	276051	SPBC1604.19c	SPCC645.08c	trs8501	snd1	SPBC1604.19c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982736088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760309	2542459	2543617	278920	280031	SPAC1D4.03c	SPAC4A8.10	aut12	SPAC4A8.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.637317869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760310	2542459	2540131	278920	276668	SPAC1D4.03c	SPBC1778.05c	aut12	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928833319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760311	2542459	2541771	278920	278265	SPAC1D4.03c	SPAC23H3.06	aut12	apl6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.71726215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760312	2542459	2539226	278920	275796	SPAC1D4.03c	SPCC16C4.20c	aut12	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.402139109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760313	2542459	2542107	278920	278583	SPAC1D4.03c	SPAC30.01c	aut12	sec72	-	sec7b|sec702	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.867169245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760314	2542459	2538847	278920	275428	SPAC1D4.03c	SPCC594.06c	aut12	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.01505273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760315	2542459	2542724	278920	279175	SPAC1D4.03c	SPAC767.01c	aut12	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.754546517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760316	2542459	2540127	278920	276664	SPAC1D4.03c	SPBC106.20	aut12	exo70	-	SPBC582.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815953198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760317	2542459	2542568	278920	279024	SPAC1D4.03c	SPAC1952.02	aut12	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992251385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760318	2542459	2539051	278920	275624	SPAC1D4.03c	SPCC1183.11	aut12	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319675024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760319	2542459	2540338	278920	276867	SPAC1D4.03c	SPBC2G2.13c	aut12	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927970708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760320	2542459	2540396	278920	276924	SPAC1D4.03c	SPBC31F10.12	aut12	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982816817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760321	2542459	2540673	278920	277198	SPAC1D4.03c	SPBC1D7.03	aut12	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.384735053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760322	2542459	2540886	278920	277403	SPAC1D4.03c	SPBC4F6.10	aut12	vps901	-	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.749429839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760323	2542459	2542857	278920	279303	SPAC1D4.03c	SPAC144.06	aut12	apl5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.481611604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760324	2542459	2538774	278920	275356	SPAC1D4.03c	SPCC162.06c	aut12	SPCC162.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326589296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760325	2542459	2542946	278920	279386	SPAC1D4.03c	SPAC6F12.03c	aut12	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.280338348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760326	2542459	2542419	278920	278882	SPAC1D4.03c	SPAC17G6.05c	aut12	bro1	-	SPAC17G6.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.688755442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760327	2542459	2540836	278920	277354	SPAC1D4.03c	SPBC18H10.19	aut12	vps38	-	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.563581353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760328	2542459	2539408	278920	275973	SPAC1D4.03c	SPCC576.12c	aut12	mhf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.774072413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760329	2542459	2540342	278920	276871	SPAC1D4.03c	SPBC2G2.01c	aut12	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.771689753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760330	2542459	2543315	278920	279739	SPAC1D4.03c	SPAC6B12.07c	aut12	SPAC6B12.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.939111799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760331	2542459	2539421	278920	275986	SPAC1D4.03c	SPCC794.11c	aut12	ent3	-	SPCC794.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.084001051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760332	2542459	2539213	278920	275783	SPAC1D4.03c	SPCC285.10c	aut12	SPCC285.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.76897151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760333	2542459	2541337	278920	277848	SPAC1D4.03c	SPBP35G2.13c	aut12	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454239576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760334	2542459	2539519	278920	276081	SPAC1D4.03c	SPCC364.05	aut12	vps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.232966788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760335	2542459	2540643	278920	277168	SPAC1D4.03c	SPBC19G7.06	aut12	mbx1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780253147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760336	2542459	2543619	278920	280033	SPAC1D4.03c	SPAC4F10.04	aut12	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.372822253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760337	2542459	2540725	278920	277248	SPAC1D4.03c	SPBC215.14c	aut12	vps20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.690542774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760338	2542459	2541531	278920	278031	SPAC1D4.03c	SPAC25A8.01c	aut12	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.629212818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760339	2542459	2540325	278920	276855	SPAC1D4.03c	SPBC21B10.10	aut12	rps402	-	rps4-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091092373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760340	2542459	2539136	278920	275708	SPAC1D4.03c	SPCC1919.05	aut12	SPCC1919.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982554858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760341	2542459	2543337	278920	279760	SPAC1D4.03c	SPAC959.08	aut12	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.337087208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760342	2542459	2542423	278920	278885	SPAC1D4.03c	SPAC17G6.08	aut12	pep7	-	vac1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.623833056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760343	2542459	2541774	278920	278268	SPAC1D4.03c	SPAC22E12.05c	aut12	rer1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.418252287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760344	2542459	2538854	278920	275435	SPAC1D4.03c	SPCP1E11.05c	aut12	are2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.503829117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760345	2542459	2540828	278920	277346	SPAC1D4.03c	SPBC4B4.06	aut12	vps25	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570034836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760346	2542459	2541062	278920	277577	SPAC1D4.03c	SPBC660.11	aut12	tcg1	-	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.06174168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760347	2542459	2542836	278920	279282	SPAC1D4.03c	SPAC13G7.06	aut12	met16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.921220777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760348	2542459	2542208	278920	278683	SPAC1D4.03c	SPAC17G8.08c	aut12	SPAC17G8.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.878106886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760349	2541379	2543529	277890	279947	SPBP8B7.27	SPAC4C5.02c	mug30	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570097665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760350	2541379	2542293	277890	278761	SPBP8B7.27	SPAC17G8.14c	mug30	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7101901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760351	2541379	2542502	277890	278960	SPBP8B7.27	SPAC139.06	mug30	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.331399845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760352	2541379	2542689	277890	279142	SPBP8B7.27	SPAC29B12.04	mug30	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049707335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760353	2541379	2542555	277890	279012	SPBP8B7.27	SPAC1952.06c	mug30	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.943610555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760354	2541379	2540929	277890	277445	SPBP8B7.27	SPBC354.03	mug30	swd3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.456501689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760355	2541379	2543319	277890	279743	SPBP8B7.27	SPAC6B12.09	mug30	trm10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.374972601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760356	2541379	2542791	277890	279240	SPBP8B7.27	SPAC167.04	mug30	pam17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.56746949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760357	2541379	2542568	277890	279024	SPBP8B7.27	SPAC1952.02	mug30	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.970010974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760358	2541379	2539898	277890	276444	SPBP8B7.27	SPBC12D12.07c	mug30	trx2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814049805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760359	2541379	2542469	277890	278930	SPBP8B7.27	SPAC19A8.04	mug30	erg5	-	cyp61	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.837915962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760360	2541379	2541310	277890	277822	SPBP8B7.27	SPBP18G5.03	mug30	toc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.945051844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760361	2541379	2539498	277890	276061	SPBP8B7.27	SPCC645.11c	mug30	mug117	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812986787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760362	2541379	2540862	277890	277379	SPBP8B7.27	SPBC4C3.06	mug30	syp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379968634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760363	2541379	2539013	277890	275586	SPBP8B7.27	SPCC364.03	mug30	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329822355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760364	2541379	2540683	277890	277208	SPBP8B7.27	SPBC19G7.04	mug30	SPBC19G7.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.946969641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760365	2539953	2541771	276497	278265	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC23H3.06	png2	apl6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.206897169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760366	2539953	2538922	276497	275499	SPBC1709.11c	SPCC16C4.10	png2	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09009425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760367	2539953	2541208	276497	277722	SPBC1709.11c	SPBC887.04c	png2	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391842576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760368	2539953	2538847	276497	275428	SPBC1709.11c	SPCC594.06c	png2	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.252422477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760369	2539953	2542335	276497	278801	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC16E8.12c	png2	png3	-	SPAC16E8.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.247880203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760370	2539953	2542318	276497	278784	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC16C9.05	png2	cph1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.713580622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760371	2539953	2542277	276497	278746	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC17A5.02c	png2	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.187804673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760372	2539953	2543308	276497	279732	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC694.04c	png2	SPAC694.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.578606605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760373	2539953	2543563	276497	279979	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC664.02c	png2	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.474221942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760374	2539953	2542845	276497	279291	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC824.04	png2	SPAC824.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.743233649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760375	2539953	2542513	276497	278971	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC1952.05	png2	gcn5	-	kat2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.296633678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760376	2539953	2539845	276497	276393	SPBC1709.11c	SPBC12C2.02c	png2	ste20	-	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386287358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760377	2539953	2542507	276497	278965	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC18G6.13	png2	SPAC18G6.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.855229953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760378	2539953	2539733	276497	276285	SPBC1709.11c	SPBC16E9.12c	png2	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.731726707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760379	2539953	2540673	276497	277198	SPBC1709.11c	SPBC1D7.03	png2	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.937860113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760380	2539953	2541496	276497	277998	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC23D3.09	png2	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.766514811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760381	2539953	2541413	276497	277921	SPBC1709.11c	SPBPJ4664.06	png2	gpt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517098004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760382	2539953	2543643	276497	280057	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC3G9.07c	png2	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.059886375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760383	2539953	2541899	276497	278389	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC22E12.11c	png2	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.521551916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760384	2539953	2542857	276497	279303	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC144.06	png2	apl5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.646133342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760385	2539953	2539667	276497	276222	SPBC1709.11c	SPBC13G1.08c	png2	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.592265318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760386	2539953	2543378	276497	279800	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC3H8.07c	png2	pac10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.978940182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760387	2539953	2539958	276497	276502	SPBC1709.11c	SPBC1718.07c	png2	zfs1	-	moc4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.13997636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760388	2539953	2542519	276497	278977	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC19G12.08	png2	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.976459531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760389	2539953	2540530	276497	277058	SPBC1709.11c	SPBC405.05	png2	atg16	-	SPBC405.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445382059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760390	2539953	2543443	276497	279863	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC3H1.12c	png2	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.595491772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760391	2539953	2540229	276497	276761	SPBC1709.11c	SPBC31F10.15c	png2	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.718865161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760392	2539953	2541488	276497	277990	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC227.17c	png2	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200192269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760393	2539953	2539812	276497	276362	SPBC1709.11c	SPBC1347.02	png2	fkbp39	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.711835251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760394	2539953	2543254	276497	279682	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC1006.03c	png2	red1	-	iss3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.222642739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760395	2539953	2541713	276497	278208	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC3A12.12	png2	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.835053078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760396	2539953	2540001	276497	276545	SPBC1709.11c	SPBC1289.13c	png2	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.32840107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760397	2539953	2542170	276497	278645	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC17G8.13c	png2	mst2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.309758762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760398	2539953	2542806	276497	279254	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC1610.01	png2	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.701291732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760399	2539953	2543304	276497	279728	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC6B12.12	png2	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.705229163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760400	2539953	2538966	276497	275540	SPBC1709.11c	SPCC18.10	png2	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.281967027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760401	2539953	2541531	276497	278031	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC25A8.01c	png2	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.476672227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760402	2539953	2542826	276497	279273	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC13G6.09	png2	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.383580921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760403	2539953	2541789	276497	278281	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC23H4.08	png2	iwr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.474173748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760404	2539953	2540555	276497	277082	SPBC1709.11c	SPBP16F5.02	png2	mcs2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.722848158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760405	2539953	2539205	276497	275775	SPBC1709.11c	SPCC4B3.15	png2	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.900239473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760406	2539953	2541675	276497	278171	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC22F8.12c	png2	shf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.378909369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760407	2539953	2540787	276497	277306	SPBC1709.11c	SPBC1921.07c	png2	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.169764722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760408	2540462	2542895	276990	279339	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAC13G6.10c	sap14	asl1	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7839779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760409	2540462	2543617	276990	280031	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAC4A8.10	sap14	SPAC4A8.10	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818629706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760410	2540462	2542787	276990	279236	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAC9G1.08c	sap14	SPAC9G1.08c	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.49723183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760411	2540462	2543339	276990	279762	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAC630.13c	sap14	tsc2	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447209511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760412	2540462	2541374	276990	277885	SPBC29A3.07c	SPBPB10D8.06c	sap14	SPBPB10D8.06c	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.204119529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760413	2540462	2543434	276990	279854	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAC8F11.02c	sap14	dph3	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.449795836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760414	2540462	2542613	276990	279067	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAC18B11.03c	sap14	SPAC18B11.03c	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445319682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760415	2540462	2543661	276990	280075	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAC644.08	sap14	SPAC644.08	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.984648313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760416	2540462	2542555	276990	279012	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAC1952.06c	sap14	SPAC1952.06c	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.970630167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760417	2540462	2542277	276990	278746	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAC17A5.02c	sap14	dbr1	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.692535812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760418	2540462	2539792	276990	276342	SPBC29A3.07c	SPBC1271.14	sap14	SPBC1271.14	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.178053979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760419	2540462	2543308	276990	279732	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAC694.04c	sap14	SPAC694.04c	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440875323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760420	2540462	2539381	276990	275947	SPBC29A3.07c	SPCC1739.10	sap14	mug33	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643967326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760421	2540462	2542981	276990	279419	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAC824.02	sap14	bst1	sab14|SF3b14a	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.690570552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760422	2540462	2539310	276990	275877	SPBC29A3.07c	SPCC285.17	sap14	spp27	sab14|SF3b14a	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.99050936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760423	2540462	2542268	276990	278737	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAC17A5.07c	sap14	ulp2	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.859138734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760424	2540462	2541741	276990	278235	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAC20G4.02c	sap14	fus1	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.976502312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760425	2540462	2538821	276990	275402	SPBC29A3.07c	SPCC584.01c	sap14	SPCC584.01c	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.39789313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760426	2540462	2542507	276990	278965	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAC18G6.13	sap14	SPAC18G6.13	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.132040373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760427	2540462	2542873	276990	279318	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAC9G1.02	sap14	wis4	sab14|SF3b14a	wak1|wik1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.313230384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760428	2540462	2541109	276990	277624	SPBC29A3.07c	SPBC6B1.02	sap14	ppk30	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992185071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760429	2540462	2541183	276990	277697	SPBC29A3.07c	SPBC725.14	sap14	arg6	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.923027573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760430	2540462	2540665	276990	277190	SPBC29A3.07c	SPBC83.02c	sap14	rpl4302	sab14|SF3b14a	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647236715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760431	2540462	2542710	276990	279163	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAC750.08c	sap14	SPAC750.08c	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.254745742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760432	2540462	2540751	276990	277273	SPBC29A3.07c	SPBC20F10.10	sap14	psl1	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933186579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760433	2540462	2539815	276990	276365	SPBC29A3.07c	SPBC1105.02c	sap14	lys4	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.930050795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760434	2540462	2542254	276990	278724	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAC30D11.04c	sap14	nup124	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.519787207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760435	2540462	2541536	276990	278036	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAC1071.02	sap14	mms19	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.983271406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760436	2540462	2541186	276990	277700	SPBC29A3.07c	SPBC725.01	sap14	SPBC725.01	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386091895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760437	2540462	2540229	276990	276761	SPBC29A3.07c	SPBC31F10.15c	sap14	atp15	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.400195697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760438	2540462	2538884	276990	275462	SPBC29A3.07c	SPCC1393.08	sap14	SPCC1393.08	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.984103471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760439	2540462	3361520	276990	280596	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAC1610.02c	sap14	SPAC1610.02c	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384455112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760440	2540462	2539706	276990	276259	SPBC29A3.07c	SPBC16G5.13	sap14	ptf2	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.566613511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760441	2540462	2542806	276990	279254	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAC1610.01	sap14	saf5	sab14|SF3b14a	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.894927383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760442	2540462	2542547	276990	279004	SPBC29A3.07c	SPACUNK4.09	sap14	SPACUNK4.09	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387332688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760443	2540462	2538762	276990	275345	SPBC29A3.07c	SPCC306.04c	sap14	set1	sab14|SF3b14a	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.760843538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760444	2540462	2539438	276990	276001	SPBC29A3.07c	SPCC4B3.07	sap14	nro1	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.562097269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760445	2540462	2542883	276990	279328	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAC1486.04c	sap14	alm1	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.931345932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760446	2540462	2543304	276990	279728	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAC6B12.12	sap14	tom70	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.83745198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760447	2540462	2540960	276990	277476	SPBC29A3.07c	SPBC3D6.02	sap14	but2	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.07253952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760448	2540462	2541372	276990	277883	SPBC29A3.07c	SPBP8B7.28c	sap14	stc1	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321238978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760449	2540462	2540531	276990	277059	SPBC29A3.07c	SPBC23E6.08	sap14	sat1	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.456464672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760450	2540462	2543662	276990	280076	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAC9.07c	sap14	SPAC9.07c	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.350370671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760451	2540462	2543480	276990	279900	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAC688.03c	sap14	SPAC688.03c	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.371252108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760452	2540462	2539514	276990	276076	SPBC29A3.07c	SPCC663.14c	sap14	trp663	sab14|SF3b14a	SPCC663.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579941229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760453	2540462	2539772	276990	276323	SPBC29A3.07c	SPBC1734.05c	sap14	spf31	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.399549197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760454	2540462	2542222	276990	278695	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAC31G5.18c	sap14	sde2	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.499792972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760455	2540462	2539668	276990	276223	SPBC29A3.07c	SPBC11B10.10c	sap14	pht1	sab14|SF3b14a	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.373752521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760456	2540462	2539928	276990	276472	SPBC29A3.07c	SPBC1604.08c	sap14	imp1	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.409069316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760457	2540462	2541356	276990	277867	SPBC29A3.07c	SPBP35G2.12	sap14	SPBP35G2.12	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.823450734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760458	2540462	2538792	276990	275373	SPBC29A3.07c	SPCP1E11.10	sap14	SPCP1E11.10	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097522497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760459	2540462	2542119	276990	278595	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAC1834.08	sap14	mak1	sab14|SF3b14a	phk3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.453651841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760460	2540462	2543387	276990	279809	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAPB1E7.02c	sap14	mcl1	sab14|SF3b14a	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.972138625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760461	2540462	2541627	276990	278123	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAC1F5.08c	sap14	yam8	sab14|SF3b14a	ehs1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153067224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760462	2540462	2542399	276990	278863	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAC1805.10	sap14	SPAC1805.10	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.057911675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760463	2540462	2541867	276990	278357	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAC22E12.14c	sap14	sck2	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.908386733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760464	2540462	2539588	276990	276146	SPBC29A3.07c	SPCC962.04	sap14	rps1201	sab14|SF3b14a	rps12|rps12-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.40003379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760465	2540462	2540320	276990	276850	SPBC29A3.07c	SPBC3D6.04c	sap14	mad1	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.504498061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760466	2540462	2542879	276990	279324	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAC13G7.07	sap14	arb2	sab14|SF3b14a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.211390894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760467	2540462	2539033	276990	275606	SPBC29A3.07c	SPCC1450.07c	sap14	dao1	sab14|SF3b14a	SPCC1450.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702585383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760468	2540462	2542609	276990	279063	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAC31G5.04	sap14	lys12	sab14|SF3b14a	SPAC31G5.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.241638785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760469	2541135	2542207	277650	278682	SPBC839.03c	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC839.03c	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.440765719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760470	2541135	2539584	277650	276143	SPBC839.03c	SPCC63.03	SPBC839.03c	SPCC63.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812916963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760471	2541135	2540913	277650	277429	SPBC839.03c	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC839.03c	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783008074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760472	2541135	2543152	277650	279584	SPBC839.03c	SPAC869.03c	SPBC839.03c	SPAC869.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641680806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760473	2541135	2541818	277650	278309	SPBC839.03c	SPAC11G7.02	SPBC839.03c	pub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.689546111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760474	2541135	2543064	277650	279497	SPBC839.03c	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC839.03c	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.302690522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760475	2541135	2542378	277650	278842	SPBC839.03c	SPAC1805.04	SPBC839.03c	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.351044588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760476	2541135	2538993	277650	275567	SPBC839.03c	SPCC162.12	SPBC839.03c	tco89	-	SPCC1753.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444298812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760477	2541135	2540296	277650	276827	SPBC839.03c	SPBC2D10.05	SPBC839.03c	exg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.322528856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760478	2541135	2540491	277650	277019	SPBC839.03c	SPBC28E12.04	SPBC839.03c	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.410759182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760479	2541135	2540455	277650	276983	SPBC839.03c	SPBC215.05	SPBC839.03c	gpd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92288128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760480	2541135	2541795	277650	278286	SPBC839.03c	SPAC2E1P3.02c	SPBC839.03c	amt3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875628296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760481	2541135	2538775	277650	275357	SPBC839.03c	SPCC23B6.05c	SPBC839.03c	ssb3	-	rpa3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.951910768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760482	2541135	2540945	277650	277461	SPBC839.03c	SPBC342.06c	SPBC839.03c	rtt109	-	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.485125249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760483	2541135	2541026	277650	277541	SPBC839.03c	SPBC337.09	SPBC839.03c	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442425235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760484	2541135	2540220	277650	276753	SPBC839.03c	SPBC337.03	SPBC839.03c	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.722887359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760485	2541135	2541119	277650	277634	SPBC839.03c	SPBC651.11c	SPBC839.03c	apm3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321504682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760486	2541135	2540467	277650	276995	SPBC839.03c	SPBC2G2.07c	SPBC839.03c	mug178	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81888214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760487	2541135	2538698	277650	275283	SPBC839.03c	SPCC1442.02	SPBC839.03c	SPCC1442.02	-	SPCC1450.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.007081285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760488	2541135	2541014	277650	277529	SPBC839.03c	SPBC3D6.06c	SPBC839.03c	prs5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322094603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760489	2541135	2542558	277650	279014	SPBC839.03c	SPAC1952.07	SPBC839.03c	rad1	-	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.776497059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760490	2541135	2540964	277650	277480	SPBC839.03c	SPBC365.16	SPBC839.03c	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.691319088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760491	2541135	2542036	277650	278518	SPBC839.03c	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC839.03c	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.971823344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760492	2541135	2543514	277650	279932	SPBC839.03c	SPAC4D7.03	SPBC839.03c	pop2	-	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.12108502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760493	2541135	2538770	277650	275353	SPBC839.03c	SPCC1753.02c	SPBC839.03c	git3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448991781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760494	2541135	2542464	277650	278925	SPBC839.03c	SPAC1A6.09c	SPBC839.03c	lag1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510950668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760495	2541135	2542921	277650	279362	SPBC839.03c	SPAC1093.01	SPBC839.03c	ppr5	-	SPAC12B10.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.121625263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760496	2541135	2541310	277650	277822	SPBC839.03c	SPBP18G5.03	SPBC839.03c	toc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.080361773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760497	2541135	2540326	277650	276856	SPBC839.03c	SPBC2G5.06c	SPBC839.03c	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.901628763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760498	2541135	2542007	277650	278490	SPBC839.03c	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC839.03c	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.174855635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760499	2541135	2543244	277650	279672	SPBC839.03c	SPAC6B12.06c	SPBC839.03c	rrg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.620896449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760500	2541135	2539974	277650	276518	SPBC839.03c	SPBC32H8.07	SPBC839.03c	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.199811354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760501	2541135	2540394	277650	276922	SPBC839.03c	SPBC2D10.09	SPBC839.03c	snr1	-	SPBC2D10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194953232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760502	2541135	2542519	277650	278977	SPBC839.03c	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC839.03c	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.880071115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760503	2541135	2540229	277650	276761	SPBC839.03c	SPBC31F10.15c	SPBC839.03c	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.618662281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760504	2541135	2538884	277650	275462	SPBC839.03c	SPCC1393.08	SPBC839.03c	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992326746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760505	2541135	2541488	277650	277990	SPBC839.03c	SPAC227.17c	SPBC839.03c	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509671969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760506	2541135	2541742	277650	278236	SPBC839.03c	SPAC22H10.09	SPBC839.03c	SPAC22H10.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818417519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760507	2541135	3361520	277650	280596	SPBC839.03c	SPAC1610.02c	SPBC839.03c	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092857995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760508	2541135	2539763	277650	276314	SPBC839.03c	SPBC1861.05	SPBC839.03c	SPBC1861.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.86773432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760509	2541135	2542881	277650	279326	SPBC839.03c	SPAC13F5.03c	SPBC839.03c	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439322946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760510	2541135	2543304	277650	279728	SPBC839.03c	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC839.03c	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.14752511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760511	2541135	2542731	277650	279181	SPBC839.03c	SPAC5H10.09c	SPBC839.03c	SPAC5H10.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.329620006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760512	2541135	2543439	277650	279859	SPBC839.03c	SPAPB1A10.13	SPBC839.03c	SPAPB1A10.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093079242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760513	2541135	2539207	277650	275777	SPBC839.03c	SPCC285.09c	SPBC839.03c	cgs2	-	pde1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569393112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760514	2541135	2543633	277650	280047	SPBC839.03c	SPAC3H8.05c	SPBC839.03c	mms1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.410090615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760515	2541135	2539205	277650	275775	SPBC839.03c	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC839.03c	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51301703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760516	2541135	2538840	277650	275421	SPBC839.03c	SPCC736.07c	SPBC839.03c	SPCC736.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452675704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760517	2541135	2542021	277650	278504	SPBC839.03c	SPAP14E8.02	SPBC839.03c	tos4	-	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.509219142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760518	2541135	2541806	277650	278297	SPBC839.03c	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC839.03c	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.895391554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760519	2541135	2543387	277650	279809	SPBC839.03c	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC839.03c	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.684860552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760520	2541135	2540309	277650	276839	SPBC839.03c	SPBC21B10.13c	SPBC839.03c	yox1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.870460787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760521	2541135	2542680	277650	279133	SPBC839.03c	SPAC26F1.09	SPBC839.03c	gyp51	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258277148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760522	2541135	2540787	277650	277306	SPBC839.03c	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC839.03c	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.773711433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760523	2541135	2540736	277650	277259	SPBC839.03c	SPBC19F8.02	SPBC839.03c	SPBC19F8.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.155847876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760524	2542237	2539050	278709	275623	SPAC19E9.02	SPCC11E10.08	fin1	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.093646119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760525	2542237	2543565	278709	279981	SPAC19E9.02	SPAPB24D3.04c	fin1	mag1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.802114013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760526	2542237	2542862	278709	279308	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC140.03	fin1	arb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.743480297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760527	2542237	2540060	278709	276598	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC106.01	fin1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.23282079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760528	2542237	2540913	278709	277429	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC56F2.08c	fin1	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.515465759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760529	2542237	2542787	278709	279236	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC9G1.08c	fin1	SPAC9G1.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.688374369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760530	2542237	2542378	278709	278842	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC1805.04	fin1	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.669059876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760531	2542237	2543524	278709	279942	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC4D7.07c	fin1	csi2	-	SPAC4D7.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.880295123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760532	2542237	2541856	278709	278347	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC23H3.08c	fin1	bub3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.954680493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760533	2542237	2541345	278709	277856	SPAC19E9.02	SPBP35G2.07	fin1	ilv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.25728142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760534	2542237	2539309	278709	275876	SPAC19E9.02	SPCC4G3.19	fin1	alp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.073523356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760535	2542237	2540664	278709	277189	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC215.02	fin1	bob1	-	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.819704593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760536	2542237	2538976	278709	275550	SPAC19E9.02	SPCC1840.04	fin1	pca1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193518107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760537	2542237	2539420	278709	275985	SPAC19E9.02	SPCC970.07c	fin1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.262360684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760538	2542237	2539443	278709	276006	SPAC19E9.02	SPCC736.02	fin1	SPCC736.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515145345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760539	2542237	2541498	278709	278000	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC227.10	fin1	SPAC227.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701658034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760540	2542237	2540306	278709	276836	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC2G5.02c	fin1	ckb2	-	SPBC2G5.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.077158702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760541	2542237	2541026	278709	277541	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC337.09	fin1	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445516493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760542	2542237	2540929	278709	277445	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC354.03	fin1	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852852333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760543	2542237	2540727	278709	277250	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC1921.03c	fin1	mex67	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.754220949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760544	2542237	2542022	278709	278505	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC23A1.03	fin1	apt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.838589773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760545	2542237	2541323	278709	277835	SPAC19E9.02	SPBP35G2.14	fin1	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.619094529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760546	2542237	2543685	278709	280099	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC3C7.03c	fin1	rad55	-	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.665759926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760547	2542237	2540595	278709	277121	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC21C3.02c	fin1	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.837830987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760548	2542237	2539244	278709	275814	SPAC19E9.02	SPCC1672.06c	fin1	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.701510562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760549	2542237	2541522	278709	278023	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC23E2.01	fin1	fep1	-	gaf2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.717386416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760550	2542237	2538906	278709	275483	SPAC19E9.02	SPCC1259.03	fin1	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.005511416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760551	2542237	2540825	278709	277343	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC428.08c	fin1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.099976306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760552	2542237	2541021	278709	277536	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC3B8.10c	fin1	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.101235752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760553	2542237	2539023	278709	275596	SPAC19E9.02	SPCC594.05c	fin1	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706898435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760554	2542237	2539467	278709	276030	SPAC19E9.02	SPCC417.07c	fin1	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.123999117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760555	2542237	2541649	278709	278145	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC1F3.06c	fin1	spo15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.133007724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760556	2542237	2541776	278709	278270	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC23H3.05c	fin1	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.977280435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760557	2542237	2542123	278709	278599	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC18G6.15	fin1	mal3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.753922875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760558	2542237	2538706	278709	275290	SPAC19E9.02	SPCC338.08	fin1	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.500243876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760559	2542237	2539046	278709	275619	SPAC19E9.02	SPCC1223.12c	fin1	meu10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.622758131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760560	2542237	2539219	278709	275789	SPAC19E9.02	SPCC1795.01c	fin1	mad3	-	SPCC895.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.452975763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760561	2542237	2542521	278709	278979	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC18G6.12c	fin1	SPAC18G6.12c	-	B22918-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.969855081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760562	2542237	2539999	278709	276543	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC1734.15	fin1	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.345532801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760563	2542237	2543117	278709	279549	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC806.08c	fin1	mod21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.477050126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760564	2542237	2543346	278709	279768	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC688.14	fin1	set13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990529195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760565	2542237	2539667	278709	276222	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC13G1.08c	fin1	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.306220378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760566	2542237	2542126	278709	278602	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC1B3.05	fin1	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.18442076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760567	2542237	2542007	278709	278490	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC20H4.07	fin1	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.329762463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760568	2542237	2543244	278709	279672	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC6B12.06c	fin1	rrg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.443014863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760569	2542237	2543378	278709	279800	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC3H8.07c	fin1	pac10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.01023539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760570	2542237	2543311	278709	279735	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC977.15	fin1	SPAC977.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.052738095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760571	2542237	2541142	278709	277657	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC725.04	fin1	SPBC725.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507490391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760572	2542237	2540342	278709	276871	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC2G2.01c	fin1	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380530559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760573	2542237	2541053	278709	277568	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC56F2.10c	fin1	alg5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632929694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760574	2542237	2540967	278709	277483	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC36B7.08c	fin1	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.560581672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760575	2542237	2538690	278709	275275	SPAC19E9.02	SPCC1393.05	fin1	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.657645874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760576	2542237	2540589	278709	277115	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC20F10.06	fin1	mad2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.85187944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760577	2542237	2538848	278709	275429	SPAC19E9.02	SPCC613.12c	fin1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.15764234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760578	2542237	2541017	278709	277532	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC36.07	fin1	elp1	-	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.682543645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760579	2542237	2541628	278709	278124	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC110.02	fin1	pds5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.998269835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760580	2542237	2542516	278709	278974	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC2F7.04	fin1	pmc2	-	med1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.848600151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760581	2542237	2543619	278709	280033	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC4F10.04	fin1	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.368090411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760582	2542237	2540498	278709	277026	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC27.02c	fin1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.863317576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760583	2542237	2542418	278709	278881	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC1805.07c	fin1	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.098933446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760584	2542237	2543427	278709	279847	SPAC19E9.02	SPAPB1A10.15	fin1	arv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.187521806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760585	2542237	2540551	278709	277078	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC23E6.01c	fin1	cxr1	-	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.191935551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760586	2542237	2543380	278709	279802	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC4G9.16c	fin1	rpl901	-	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.617656938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760587	2542237	2542716	278709	279169	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC25H1.07	fin1	emc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317050732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760588	2542237	2539700	278709	276253	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC1685.15c	fin1	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.00913297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760589	2542237	2543644	278709	280058	SPAC19E9.02	SPAPB1A10.03	fin1	nxt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390745432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760590	2542237	2543463	278709	279883	SPAC19E9.02	SPAPB21F2.03	fin1	slx9	-	SPAPB21F2.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.395900682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760591	2542237	2542571	278709	279027	SPAC19E9.02	SPAC589.02c	fin1	med13	-	spTrap240|srb9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331595375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760592	2542237	2538730	278709	275314	SPAC19E9.02	SPCC31H12.02c	fin1	mug73	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868129432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760593	2539930	2542207	276474	278682	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC17H9.10c	reb1	ddb1	SPBC660.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.031262397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760594	2539930	2538721	276474	275305	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC1494.10	reb1	adn3	SPBC660.01c	SPCC70.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.088989008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760595	2539930	2542518	276474	278976	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC1B3.16c	reb1	vht1	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508858671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760596	2539930	2541145	276474	277660	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC651.12c	reb1	dbl7	SPBC660.01c	SPBC651.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.889748129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760597	2539930	2539452	276474	276015	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC70.03c	reb1	SPCC70.03c	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.542376683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760598	2539930	2539940	276474	276484	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC16A3.10	reb1	SPBC16A3.10	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.981483213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760599	2539930	2540131	276474	276668	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC1778.05c	reb1	SPBC1778.05c	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.70483913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760600	2539930	2543339	276474	279762	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC630.13c	reb1	tsc2	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.66337222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760601	2539930	2540068	276474	276606	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC1734.12c	reb1	alg12	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.620361527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760602	2539930	2541117	276474	277632	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC646.13	reb1	sds23	SPBC660.01c	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320826666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760603	2539930	2540347	276474	276876	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC30B4.08	reb1	eri1	SPBC660.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.190561192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760604	2539930	2542614	276474	279068	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC1399.04c	reb1	SPAC1399.04c	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189511499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760605	2539930	2540686	276474	277211	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC21D10.10	reb1	bdc1	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.131547695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760606	2539930	2541584	276474	278081	SPBC1198.11c	SPAP32A8.02	reb1	SPAP32A8.02	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.123383294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760607	2539930	2540491	276474	277019	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC28E12.04	reb1	SPBC28E12.04	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.799127605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760608	2539930	2540455	276474	276983	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC215.05	reb1	gpd1	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.741025373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760609	2539930	2540664	276474	277189	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC215.02	reb1	bob1	SPBC660.01c	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.117708505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760610	2539930	2543320	276474	279744	SPBC1198.11c	SPAPJ695.01c	reb1	SPAPJ695.01c	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443320207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760611	2539930	2538976	276474	275550	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC1840.04	reb1	pca1	SPBC660.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.802060217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760612	2539930	2541361	276474	277872	SPBC1198.11c	SPBP8B7.10c	reb1	utp16	SPBC660.01c	SPBP8B7.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.90077534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760613	2539930	2542050	276474	278529	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC212.02	reb1	SPAC212.02	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.689243164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760614	2539930	2543681	276474	280095	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC9.02c	reb1	SPAC9.02c	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440744054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760615	2539930	2543111	276474	279543	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC806.07	reb1	ndk1	SPBC660.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.117177234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760616	2539930	2542012	276474	278495	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC23C11.02c	reb1	rps23	SPBC660.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986416171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760617	2539930	2541346	276474	277857	SPBC1198.11c	SPBP8B7.08c	reb1	ppm1	SPBC660.01c	SPBP8B7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.519714006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760618	2539930	2540993	276474	277509	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC342.01c	reb1	alg6	SPBC660.01c	SPBC3F6.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322535526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760619	2539930	2540425	276474	276953	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC27.06c	reb1	mgr2	SPBC660.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.506689857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760620	2539930	2542318	276474	278784	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC16C9.05	reb1	cph1	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.174698441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760621	2539930	2540467	276474	276995	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC2G2.07c	reb1	mug178	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.332425711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760622	2539930	2543308	276474	279732	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC694.04c	reb1	SPAC694.04c	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.782440564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760623	2539930	2542189	276474	278664	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC17A5.09c	reb1	glc9	SPBC660.01c	SPAC17A5.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317838486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760624	2539930	2539822	276474	276372	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC16G5.02c	reb1	SPBC16G5.02c	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444744821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760625	2539930	2539100	276474	275672	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC330.12c	reb1	sdh3	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.259512347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760626	2539930	2538906	276474	275483	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC1259.03	reb1	rpa12	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.018332989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760627	2539930	2542253	276474	278723	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC17H9.04c	reb1	SPAC17H9.04c	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447508563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760628	2539930	2541834	276474	278325	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC824.08	reb1	gda1	SPBC660.01c	gdp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.461279875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760629	2539930	2541812	276474	278303	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC23G3.12c	reb1	SPAC23G3.12c	SPBC660.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870619133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760630	2539930	2542554	276474	279011	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC1952.03	reb1	otu2	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.18551184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760631	2539930	2542568	276474	279024	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC1952.02	reb1	tma23	SPBC660.01c	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932020248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760632	2539930	2539023	276474	275596	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC594.05c	reb1	spf1	SPBC660.01c	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.916615188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760633	2539930	2541339	276474	277850	SPBC1198.11c	SPBP4G3.02	reb1	pho1	SPBC660.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.936154336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760634	2539930	2543514	276474	279932	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC4D7.03	reb1	pop2	SPBC660.01c	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.419293074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760635	2539930	2542950	276474	279390	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC12B10.03	reb1	bun62	SPBC660.01c	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.193519348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760636	2539930	2542177	276474	278652	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC17H9.08	reb1	SPAC17H9.08	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504558388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760637	2539930	2540797	276474	277316	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC18H10.11c	reb1	ppr2	SPBC660.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044976479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760638	2539930	2541801	276474	278292	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC2F7.08c	reb1	snf5	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.389134121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760639	2539930	2542513	276474	278971	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC1952.05	reb1	gcn5	SPBC660.01c	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.206546803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760640	2539930	2541776	276474	278270	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC23H3.05c	reb1	swd1	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.808670403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760641	2539930	2539845	276474	276393	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC12C2.02c	reb1	ste20	SPBC660.01c	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.41691072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760642	2539930	2538770	276474	275353	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC1753.02c	reb1	git3	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708828937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760643	2539930	2542652	276474	279106	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC1687.15	reb1	gsk3	SPBC660.01c	skp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.467483325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760644	2539930	2540150	276474	276687	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC16E9.14c	reb1	zrg17	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.257814855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760645	2539930	2541889	276474	278379	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC2F7.03c	reb1	pom1	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.477447681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760646	2539930	2539454	276474	276017	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC622.15c	reb1	SPCC622.15c	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.304068632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760647	2539930	2539999	276474	276543	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC1734.15	reb1	rsc4	SPBC660.01c	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.762432508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760648	2539930	2541496	276474	277998	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC23D3.09	reb1	arp42	SPBC660.01c	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.082650899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760649	2539930	2539689	276474	276244	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC1861.03	reb1	mak10	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454167944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760650	2539930	2540326	276474	276856	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC2G5.06c	reb1	hmt2	SPBC660.01c	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.640015785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760651	2539930	2539667	276474	276222	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC13G1.08c	reb1	ash2	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.962283557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760652	2539930	2542126	276474	278602	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC1B3.05	reb1	not3	SPBC660.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.078489945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760653	2539930	2539000	276474	275574	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC1450.06c	reb1	grx3	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.907775342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760654	2539930	2540261	276474	276792	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC543.05c	reb1	SPBC543.05c	SPBC660.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808276484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760655	2539930	2540751	276474	277273	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC20F10.10	reb1	psl1	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.864316626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760656	2539930	2541900	276474	278390	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC23H4.17c	reb1	srb10	SPBC660.01c	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.895070588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760657	2539930	2540318	276474	276848	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC30B4.04c	reb1	sol1	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.032151364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760658	2539930	2542519	276474	278977	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC19G12.08	reb1	scs7	SPBC660.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818686634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760659	2539930	2541389	276474	277900	SPBC1198.11c	SPBPB2B2.09c	reb1	SPBPB2B2.09c	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.909114194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760660	2539930	2539368	276474	275934	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC16A11.07	reb1	coq10	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708897699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760661	2539930	2542008	276474	278491	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC2G11.07c	reb1	ptc3	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.33066943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760662	2539930	2541464	276474	277966	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC222.08c	reb1	SPAC222.08c	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.249438673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760663	2539930	2541410	276474	277918	SPBC1198.11c	SPBPB2B2.17c	reb1	SPBPB2B2.17c	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.805864618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760664	2539930	2542597	276474	279051	SPBC1198.11c	SPAP8A3.07c	reb1	SPAP8A3.07c	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.744141687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760665	2539930	2540533	276474	277061	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC29A10.16c	reb1	SPBC29A10.16c	SPBC660.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816982702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760666	2539930	2541614	276474	278111	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC29A4.20	reb1	elp3	SPBC660.01c	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.626224224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760667	2539930	2542060	276474	278538	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC23C11.14	reb1	zhf1	SPBC660.01c	zhf	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384662199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760668	2539930	2541488	276474	277990	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC227.17c	reb1	SPAC227.17c	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38845252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760669	2539930	2539812	276474	276362	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC1347.02	reb1	fkbp39	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440399552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760670	2539930	2540193	276474	276726	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC1289.10c	reb1	adn2	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.074068811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760671	2539930	2541378	276474	277889	SPBC1198.11c	SPBP8B7.21	reb1	ubp3	SPBC660.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.846935337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760672	2539930	2541742	276474	278236	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC22H10.09	reb1	SPAC22H10.09	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.115733478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760673	2539930	3361520	276474	280596	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC1610.02c	reb1	SPAC1610.02c	SPBC660.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199452608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760674	2539930	2542869	276474	279314	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC140.02	reb1	gar2	SPBC660.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807984589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760675	2539930	2541144	276474	277659	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC685.06	reb1	rps001	SPBC660.01c	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875079881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760676	2539930	2541713	276474	278208	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC3A12.12	reb1	atp11	SPBC660.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.398642316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760677	2539930	2540706	276474	277229	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC19C7.12c	reb1	omh1	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572921651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760678	2539930	2543391	276474	279813	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC4G9.09c	reb1	arg11	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.249596478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760679	2539930	2538762	276474	275345	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC306.04c	reb1	set1	SPBC660.01c	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.095594651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760680	2539930	2539101	276474	275673	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC736.04c	reb1	gma12	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642907359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760681	2539930	2542327	276474	278793	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC16C9.06c	reb1	upf1	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.399594105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760682	2539930	2541371	276474	277882	SPBC1198.11c	SPBP4H10.17c	reb1	SPBP4H10.17c	SPBC660.01c	mrps2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.53675624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760683	2539930	2540498	276474	277026	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC27.02c	reb1	ask1	SPBC660.01c	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.744921909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760684	2539930	2542881	276474	279326	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC13F5.03c	reb1	gld1	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.323003418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760685	2539930	2539925	276474	276469	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC16H5.13	reb1	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.746455006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760686	2539930	2538966	276474	275540	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC18.10	reb1	SPCC18.10	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.175487266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760687	2539930	2543096	276474	279528	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC977.05c	reb1	SPAC977.05c	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.750975471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760688	2539930	2541103	276474	277618	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC651.06	reb1	mug166	SPBC660.01c	csa1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.201471428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760689	2539930	2540346	276474	276875	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC2F12.03c	reb1	ebs1	SPBC660.01c	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851705984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760690	2539930	2542418	276474	278881	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC1805.07c	reb1	dad2	SPBC660.01c	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.787620421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760691	2539930	2539729	276474	276281	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC11B10.07c	reb1	ivn1	SPBC660.01c	pi004|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.261911392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760692	2539930	2540629	276474	277155	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC21D10.09c	reb1	rkr1	SPBC660.01c	SPBC21D10.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816099865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760693	2539930	2542878	276474	279323	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC57A10.09c	reb1	nhp6	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.435068962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760694	2539930	2542574	276474	279030	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC186.05c	reb1	SPAC186.05c	SPBC660.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816512823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760695	2539930	2542250	276474	278720	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC17D4.03c	reb1	cis4	SPBC660.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871851091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760696	2539930	2539702	276474	276255	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC1604.12	reb1	SPBC1604.12	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323834264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760697	2539930	2539205	276474	275775	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC4B3.15	reb1	mid1	SPBC660.01c	dmf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.605723243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760698	2539930	2542607	276474	279061	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC18B11.02c	reb1	SPAC18B11.02c	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.264542962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760699	2539930	2539375	276474	275941	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC4G3.11	reb1	mug154	SPBC660.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.618357142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760700	2539930	2539253	276474	275823	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC1827.03c	reb1	SPCC1827.03c	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.686634313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760701	2539930	2542716	276474	279169	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC25H1.07	reb1	emc1	SPBC660.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.513820902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760702	2539930	2541806	276474	278297	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC4G8.13c	reb1	prz1	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.967585353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760703	2539930	2538854	276474	275435	SPBC1198.11c	SPCP1E11.05c	reb1	are2	SPBC660.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813553879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760704	2539930	2541478	276474	277980	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC2F7.17	reb1	mrf1	SPBC660.01c	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.343634914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760705	2539930	2541272	276474	277786	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC947.03c	reb1	naa38	SPBC660.01c	mak31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.690361819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760706	2539930	2542094	276474	278571	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC29B12.06c	reb1	rcd1	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712520186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760707	2539930	2541875	276474	278365	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC22F3.06c	reb1	lon1	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513468339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760708	2539930	2540787	276474	277306	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC1921.07c	reb1	sgf29	SPBC660.01c	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.145380056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760709	2539930	2542908	276474	279352	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC13G7.03	reb1	upf3	SPBC660.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.69954108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760710	2539424	2541902	275989	278392	SPCC622.19	SPAC27E2.07	jmj4	pvg2	mug149	mug53	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.740047215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760711	2539424	2541475	275989	277977	SPCC622.19	SPAC24B11.09	jmj4	mpc2	mug149	SPAC24B11.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.268769883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760712	2539424	2543637	275989	280051	SPCC622.19	SPAC3H8.02	jmj4	csr102	mug149	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992906795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760713	2539424	2540235	275989	276767	SPCC622.19	SPBC336.13c	jmj4	SPBC336.13c	mug149	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321324389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760714	2539424	2543592	275989	280007	SPCC622.19	SPAC4F10.18	jmj4	nup37	mug149	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.895541535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760715	2539424	2543376	275989	279798	SPCC622.19	SPAC3H1.06c	jmj4	SPAC3H1.06c	mug149	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193343747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760716	2539424	5802945	275989	858083	SPCC622.19	SPAC19G12.16c	jmj4	adg2	mug149	SPAC23A1.01c|mug46	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.20675187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760717	2539424	2542701	275989	279154	SPCC622.19	SPAC26H5.05	jmj4	mga2	mug149	SPAC26H5.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042299232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760718	2539424	2541771	275989	278265	SPCC622.19	SPAC23H3.06	jmj4	apl6	mug149	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778067855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760719	2539424	2542563	275989	279019	SPCC622.19	SPAC1952.11c	jmj4	ure2	mug149	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.71318077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760720	2539424	2542689	275989	279142	SPCC622.19	SPAC29B12.04	jmj4	snz1	mug149	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.460643606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760721	2539424	2542627	275989	279081	SPCC622.19	SPAC750.04c	jmj4	SPAC750.04c	mug149	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.268529763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760722	2539424	2541346	275989	277857	SPCC622.19	SPBP8B7.08c	jmj4	ppm1	mug149	SPBP8B7.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813838833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760723	2539424	2539792	275989	276342	SPCC622.19	SPBC1271.14	jmj4	SPBC1271.14	mug149	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040586123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760724	2539424	2542220	275989	278694	SPCC622.19	SPAC1A6.03c	jmj4	SPAC1A6.03c	mug149	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.85048591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760725	2539424	2541663	275989	278159	SPCC622.19	SPAC22G7.08	jmj4	ppk8	mug149	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.940753126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760726	2539424	2542311	275989	278777	SPCC622.19	SPAC16A10.05c	jmj4	dad1	mug149	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.848044771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760727	2539424	2542394	275989	278858	SPCC622.19	SPAC31G5.12c	jmj4	maf1	mug149	n150	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812936832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760728	2539424	2539046	275989	275619	SPCC622.19	SPCC1223.12c	jmj4	meu10	mug149	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.644508913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760729	2539424	2538871	275989	275450	SPCC622.19	SPCC1259.14c	jmj4	meu27	mug149	B8647-6	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.741270208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760730	2539424	2541142	275989	277657	SPCC622.19	SPBC725.04	jmj4	SPBC725.04	mug149	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981162559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760731	2539424	2541186	275989	277700	SPCC622.19	SPBC725.01	jmj4	SPBC725.01	mug149	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.837463911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760732	2539424	2540882	275989	277399	SPCC622.19	SPBC4F6.08c	jmj4	mrpl39	mug149	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.273672689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760733	2539424	2543670	275989	280084	SPCC622.19	SPAPB1E7.06c	jmj4	eme1	mug149	mms4|slx2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922267206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760734	2539424	2539925	275989	276469	SPCC622.19	SPBC16H5.13	jmj4	SPBC16H5.13	mug149	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.891955648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760735	2539424	2542403	275989	278867	SPCC622.19	SPAC19A8.05c	jmj4	sst4	mug149	vps27	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194202976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760736	2539424	2540936	275989	277452	SPCC622.19	SPBC800.05c	jmj4	atb2	mug149	alp2|ban5|tub1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.942713132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760737	2539424	2539253	275989	275823	SPCC622.19	SPCC1827.03c	jmj4	SPCC1827.03c	mug149	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986233751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760738	2539424	2543384	275989	279806	SPCC622.19	SPAC637.06	jmj4	gmh5	mug149	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.931434645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760739	2539424	2540558	275989	277085	SPCC622.19	SPBC2D10.17	jmj4	clr1	mug149	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.893588064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760740	2539424	2543237	275989	279665	SPCC622.19	SPAC6B12.02c	jmj4	mus7	mug149	mms22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867429595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760741	2539951	2542981	276495	279419	SPBC11B10.05c	SPAC824.02	rsp1	bst1	pi006|SPACTOKYO_453.30c	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.550827309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760742	2539951	2542311	276495	278777	SPBC11B10.05c	SPAC16A10.05c	rsp1	dad1	pi006|SPACTOKYO_453.30c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199012111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760743	2539951	2540990	276495	277506	SPBC11B10.05c	SPBC36B7.06c	rsp1	mug20	pi006|SPACTOKYO_453.30c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320766736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760744	2543576	2542650	279991	279104	SPAC4A8.05c	SPAC2C4.10c	myp2	csc4	myo3	SPAC2C4.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.967015101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760745	2543576	2541013	279991	277528	SPAC4A8.05c	SPBC3H7.13	myp2	far10	myo3	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.113822607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760746	2543576	2539970	279991	276514	SPAC4A8.05c	SPBC1773.01	myp2	far8	myo3	SPBC1773.01|csc3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.152693929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760747	2543576	2542318	279991	278784	SPAC4A8.05c	SPAC16C9.05	myp2	cph1	myo3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.499960761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760748	2543576	2542981	279991	279419	SPAC4A8.05c	SPAC824.02	myp2	bst1	myo3	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.053735951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760749	2543576	2540892	279991	277408	SPAC4A8.05c	SPBC530.01	myp2	gyp1	myo3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.320678993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760750	2543576	2540150	279991	276687	SPAC4A8.05c	SPBC16E9.14c	myp2	zrg17	myo3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.158975232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760751	2543576	2539898	279991	276444	SPAC4A8.05c	SPBC12D12.07c	myp2	trx2	myo3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.052962216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760752	2543576	2541889	279991	278379	SPAC4A8.05c	SPAC2F7.03c	myp2	pom1	myo3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.605259883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760753	2543576	2540886	279991	277403	SPAC4A8.05c	SPBC4F6.10	myp2	vps901	myo3	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.255451411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760754	2543576	2540961	279991	277477	SPAC4A8.05c	SPBC36B7.03	myp2	sec63	myo3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44250596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760755	2543576	2542056	279991	278535	SPAC4A8.05c	SPAC6G9.14	myp2	SPAC6G9.14	myo3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514584363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760756	2543576	2542439	279991	278901	SPAC4A8.05c	SPAC17A5.08	myp2	erp2	myo3	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.987255255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760757	2543576	2539402	279991	275967	SPAC4A8.05c	SPCC613.03	myp2	SPCC613.03	myo3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.363142962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760758	2543576	2541283	279991	277796	SPAC4A8.05c	SPBP8B7.02	myp2	rng9	myo3	SPBP8B7.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517751611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760759	2543576	2540930	279991	277446	SPAC4A8.05c	SPBC354.10	myp2	def1	myo3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386638225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760760	2543576	2543628	279991	280042	SPAC4A8.05c	SPAC3H8.10	myp2	spo20	myo3	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.765397693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760761	2543576	2542250	279991	278720	SPAC4A8.05c	SPAC17D4.03c	myp2	cis4	myo3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.161341279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760762	2543576	2539205	279991	275775	SPAC4A8.05c	SPCC4B3.15	myp2	mid1	myo3	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.422286187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760763	2543576	2541806	279991	278297	SPAC4A8.05c	SPAC4G8.13c	myp2	prz1	myo3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.317469867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760764	2543576	2540383	279991	276912	SPAC4A8.05c	SPBC31E1.02c	myp2	pmr1	myo3	cps5|pgak2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.437932782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760765	2543240	2541130	279668	277645	SPAC694.06c	SPBC776.11	mrc1	rpl2801	-	rpl28-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.002363911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760766	2543240	2541058	279668	277573	SPAC694.06c	SPBC3H7.09	mrc1	erf2	-	mug142	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.112116047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760767	2543240	2541522	279668	278023	SPAC694.06c	SPAC23E2.01	mrc1	fep1	-	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.602290041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760768	2543240	2543113	279668	279545	SPAC694.06c	SPAC3F10.07c	mrc1	erf4	-	mug91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.490708525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760769	2543240	2543628	279668	280042	SPAC694.06c	SPAC3H8.10	mrc1	spo20	-	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.92394613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760770	2543240	2543472	279668	279892	SPAC694.06c	SPAC959.04c	mrc1	omh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.309843817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760771	2538794	2542165	275375	278641	SPCC622.17	SPAC1782.08c	apn1	rex3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926069901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760772	2538794	2542213	275375	278687	SPCC622.17	SPAC3G6.13c	apn1	rpl4101	-	rpl41-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036505195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760773	2538794	2540326	275375	276856	SPCC622.17	SPBC2G5.06c	apn1	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383223175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760774	2538794	2538880	275375	275459	SPCC622.17	SPCC1393.09c	apn1	SPCC1393.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510752227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760775	2538794	2541062	275375	277577	SPCC622.17	SPBC660.11	apn1	tcg1	-	mug187	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096127454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760776	2542014	2539147	278497	275719	SPAC20H4.04	SPCC622.12c	fml2	gdh1	mfh2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045781207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760777	2542014	2540026	278497	276570	SPAC20H4.04	SPBC16D10.08c	fml2	hsp104	mfh2	SPBC16D10.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145605354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760778	2542014	2538977	278497	275551	SPAC20H4.04	SPCC1020.06c	fml2	tal1	mfh2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.407286941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760779	2542014	2543064	278497	279497	SPAC20H4.04	SPAC3G6.01	fml2	hrp3	mfh2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.40701866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760780	2542014	2542224	278497	278697	SPAC20H4.04	SPAC19G12.03	fml2	cda1	mfh2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392035902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760781	2542014	2540161	278497	276696	SPAC20H4.04	SPBC13E7.03c	fml2	SPBC13E7.03c	mfh2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982688665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760782	2542014	2541345	278497	277856	SPAC20H4.04	SPBP35G2.07	fml2	ilv1	mfh2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145752041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760783	2542014	2542569	278497	279025	SPAC20H4.04	SPAC186.08c	fml2	SPAC186.08c	mfh2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449783266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760784	2542014	2543111	278497	279543	SPAC20H4.04	SPAC806.07	fml2	ndk1	mfh2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256274885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760785	2542014	2542555	278497	279012	SPAC20H4.04	SPAC1952.06c	fml2	SPAC1952.06c	mfh2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.27853877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760786	2542014	2540463	278497	276991	SPAC20H4.04	SPBC2F12.15c	fml2	pfa3	mfh2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.56868198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760787	2542014	2541323	278497	277835	SPAC20H4.04	SPBP35G2.14	fml2	SPBP35G2.14	mfh2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77124076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760788	2542014	2542969	278497	279409	SPAC20H4.04	SPAC4G8.10	fml2	gos1	mfh2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.436699269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760789	2542014	2542300	278497	278767	SPAC20H4.04	SPAC1687.22c	fml2	puf3	mfh2	SPAC222.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.427874372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760790	2542014	2542568	278497	279024	SPAC20H4.04	SPAC1952.02	fml2	tma23	mfh2	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515249704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760791	2542014	2542036	278497	278518	SPAC20H4.04	SPAC23A1.19c	fml2	hrq1	mfh2	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.742403623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760792	2542014	2540797	278497	277316	SPAC20H4.04	SPBC18H10.11c	fml2	ppr2	mfh2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57344695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760793	2542014	2541801	278497	278292	SPAC20H4.04	SPAC2F7.08c	fml2	snf5	mfh2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.889552485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760794	2542014	2542463	278497	278924	SPAC20H4.04	SPAC1834.03c	fml2	hhf1	mfh2	h4.1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041087205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760795	2542014	2543483	278497	279903	SPAC20H4.04	SPAPB2B4.02	fml2	grx5	mfh2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.812104903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760796	2542014	2538811	278497	275392	SPAC20H4.04	SPCC330.03c	fml2	SPCC330.03c	mfh2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816582415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760797	2542014	2542990	278497	279428	SPAC20H4.04	SPAC11D3.16c	fml2	SPAC11D3.16c	mfh2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852446882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760798	2542014	2539898	278497	276444	SPAC20H4.04	SPBC12D12.07c	fml2	trx2	mfh2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.987221737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760799	2542014	2540231	278497	276763	SPAC20H4.04	SPBC336.14c	fml2	ppk26	mfh2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043431641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760800	2542014	2539624	278497	276181	SPAC20H4.04	SPBC1289.16c	fml2	cao2	mfh2	SPBC8E4.06|spao2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042171592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760801	2542014	2541828	278497	278319	SPAC20H4.04	SPAC22H12.05c	fml2	fsc1	mfh2	SPAC22H12.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.877332053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760802	2542014	2543522	278497	279940	SPAC20H4.04	SPAPB24D3.08c	fml2	SPAPB24D3.08c	mfh2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443873264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760803	2542014	2539936	278497	276480	SPAC20H4.04	SPBC1685.05	fml2	SPBC1685.05	mfh2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.507853952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760804	2542014	2543011	278497	279449	SPAC20H4.04	SPAC10F6.11c	fml2	atg17	mfh2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.051481537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760805	2542014	2541670	278497	278166	SPAC20H4.04	SPAC24H6.13	fml2	SPAC24H6.13	mfh2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810095858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760806	2542014	2540701	278497	277225	SPAC20H4.04	SPBC19C7.08c	fml2	SPBC19C7.08c	mfh2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443554314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760807	2542014	2542515	278497	278973	SPAC20H4.04	SPAC1952.09c	fml2	SPAC1952.09c	mfh2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.833695298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760808	2542014	2542222	278497	278695	SPAC20H4.04	SPAC31G5.18c	fml2	sde2	mfh2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.818121423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760809	2542014	2540992	278497	277508	SPAC20H4.04	SPBC342.05	fml2	crb2	mfh2	rhp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.356158867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760810	2542014	2539702	278497	276255	SPAC20H4.04	SPBC1604.12	fml2	SPBC1604.12	mfh2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.804147157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760811	2542014	2541627	278497	278123	SPAC20H4.04	SPAC1F5.08c	fml2	yam8	mfh2	ehs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781732913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760812	2542014	2543446	278497	279866	SPAC20H4.04	SPAC4F8.10c	fml2	stg1	mfh2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452476051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760813	2542014	2538822	278497	275403	SPAC20H4.04	SPCC1840.02c	fml2	bgs4	mfh2	cwg1|orb11|pbr1|sph1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.942513294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760814	2542014	2540787	278497	277306	SPAC20H4.04	SPBC1921.07c	fml2	sgf29	mfh2	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.081500382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760815	2539252	2538939	275822	275514	SPCC1223.11	SPCC1672.04c	ptc2	SPCC1672.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.012182858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760816	2539252	2539050	275822	275623	SPCC1223.11	SPCC11E10.08	ptc2	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.782119084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760817	2539252	2540235	275822	276767	SPCC1223.11	SPBC336.13c	ptc2	SPBC336.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.00191046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760818	2539252	2540131	275822	276668	SPCC1223.11	SPBC1778.05c	ptc2	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258312419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760819	2539252	2539930	275822	276474	SPCC1223.11	SPBC1198.11c	ptc2	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.102290988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760820	2539252	2540491	275822	277019	SPCC1223.11	SPBC28E12.04	ptc2	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.410534899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760821	2539252	2539420	275822	275985	SPCC1223.11	SPCC970.07c	ptc2	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.932001416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760822	2539252	2541205	275822	277719	SPCC1223.11	SPBC839.02	ptc2	SPBC839.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581650528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760823	2539252	2542689	275822	279142	SPCC1223.11	SPAC29B12.04	ptc2	snz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047298296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760824	2539252	2542012	275822	278495	SPCC1223.11	SPAC23C11.02c	ptc2	rps23	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.133641862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760825	2539252	2541761	275822	278255	SPCC1223.11	SPAC7D4.12c	ptc2	SPAC7D4.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.920243867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760826	2539252	2542022	275822	278505	SPCC1223.11	SPAC23A1.03	ptc2	apt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.410134849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760827	2539252	2540425	275822	276953	SPCC1223.11	SPBC27.06c	ptc2	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.19448992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760828	2539252	2539100	275822	275672	SPCC1223.11	SPCC330.12c	ptc2	sdh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323212604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760829	2539252	2540415	275822	276943	SPCC1223.11	SPBC30B4.06c	ptc2	SPBC30B4.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.267766528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760830	2539252	2540825	275822	277343	SPCC1223.11	SPBC428.08c	ptc2	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63055951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760831	2539252	2542554	275822	279011	SPCC1223.11	SPAC1952.03	ptc2	otu2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444675748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760832	2539252	2540797	275822	277316	SPCC1223.11	SPBC18H10.11c	ptc2	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.221335059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760833	2539252	2541801	275822	278292	SPCC1223.11	SPAC2F7.08c	ptc2	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.794933131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760834	2539252	2539898	275822	276444	SPCC1223.11	SPBC12D12.07c	ptc2	trx2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.178848035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760835	2539252	2542659	275822	279112	SPCC1223.11	SPAC25B8.08	ptc2	SPAC25B8.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323862675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760836	2539252	2542168	275822	278643	SPCC1223.11	SPAC17A5.16	ptc2	ftp105	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.377805294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760837	2539252	2539281	275822	275849	SPCC1223.11	SPCC132.03	ptc2	SPCC132.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.62919688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760838	2539252	2541496	275822	277998	SPCC1223.11	SPAC23D3.09	ptc2	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.623961481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760839	2539252	2539603	275822	276161	SPCC1223.11	SPBC1289.06c	ptc2	ppr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.121362009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760840	2539252	2540326	275822	276856	SPCC1223.11	SPBC2G5.06c	ptc2	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.037769629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760841	2539252	2542032	275822	278514	SPCC1223.11	SPAC23C11.04c	ptc2	pnk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322280118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760842	2539252	2540665	275822	277190	SPCC1223.11	SPBC83.02c	ptc2	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.567853504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760843	2539252	2542976	275822	279414	SPCC1223.11	SPAC9E9.09c	ptc2	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512687553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760844	2539252	2540318	275822	276848	SPCC1223.11	SPBC30B4.04c	ptc2	sol1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.967350025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760845	2539252	2542519	275822	278977	SPCC1223.11	SPAC19G12.08	ptc2	scs7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986089178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760846	2539252	5802861	275822	857999	SPCC1223.11	SPAC1D4.01	ptc2	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.882653792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760847	2539252	2542597	275822	279051	SPCC1223.11	SPAP8A3.07c	ptc2	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.493333196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760848	2539252	2540882	275822	277399	SPCC1223.11	SPBC4F6.08c	ptc2	mrpl39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.993709164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760849	2539252	2541742	275822	278236	SPCC1223.11	SPAC22H10.09	ptc2	SPAC22H10.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.703283864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760850	2539252	2538848	275822	275429	SPCC1223.11	SPCC613.12c	ptc2	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.452956861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760851	2539252	3361520	275822	280596	SPCC1223.11	SPAC1610.02c	ptc2	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.272916492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760852	2539252	2540946	275822	277462	SPCC1223.11	SPBC36.04	ptc2	cys11	-	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.121225894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760853	2539252	2541713	275822	278208	SPCC1223.11	SPAC3A12.12	ptc2	atp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703745825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760854	2539252	2538762	275822	275345	SPCC1223.11	SPCC306.04c	ptc2	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.703679476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760855	2539252	2539438	275822	276001	SPCC1223.11	SPCC4B3.07	ptc2	nro1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635854567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760856	2539252	2543304	275822	279728	SPCC1223.11	SPAC6B12.12	ptc2	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.507727225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760857	2539252	2541432	275822	277937	SPCC1223.11	SPAC1F5.05c	ptc2	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.38335924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760858	2539252	2542458	275822	278919	SPCC1223.11	SPAC30.02c	ptc2	SPAC30.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.127994757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760859	2539252	2540164	275822	276699	SPCC1223.11	SPBC1683.03c	ptc2	SPBC1683.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.255754877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760860	2539252	2538916	275822	275493	SPCC1223.11	SPCC16C4.17	ptc2	mug123	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.502755645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760861	2539252	2543044	275822	279479	SPCC1223.11	SPAC3C7.12	ptc2	tip1	-	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.393191257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760862	2539252	2539205	275822	275775	SPCC1223.11	SPCC4B3.15	ptc2	mid1	-	dmf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.658679027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760863	2539252	2541357	275822	277868	SPCC1223.11	SPBPB7E8.01	ptc2	SPBPB7E8.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.563562326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760864	2539252	2541806	275822	278297	SPCC1223.11	SPAC4G8.13c	ptc2	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439364318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760865	2539252	2543387	275822	279809	SPCC1223.11	SPAPB1E7.02c	ptc2	mcl1	-	slr3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867520933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760866	2539252	2543327	275822	279750	SPCC1223.11	SPAC1D4.06c	ptc2	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.323681927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760867	2539252	2543070	275822	279503	SPCC1223.11	SPAC2H10.02c	ptc2	SPAC2H10.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868032397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760868	2539252	2542424	275822	278886	SPCC1223.11	SPAC1805.14	ptc2	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.763156217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760869	2539252	2541869	275822	278359	SPCC1223.11	SPAC22F3.13	ptc2	tsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324385461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760870	2539252	2541478	275822	277980	SPCC1223.11	SPAC2F7.17	ptc2	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.62422275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760871	2539252	2542094	275822	278571	SPCC1223.11	SPAC29B12.06c	ptc2	rcd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.514167594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760872	2539252	2540787	275822	277306	SPCC1223.11	SPBC1921.07c	ptc2	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.192530822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760873	2542055	2539584	278534	276143	SPAC6G9.03c	SPCC63.03	mug183	SPCC63.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328834027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760874	2542055	2543661	278534	280075	SPAC6G9.03c	SPAC644.08	mug183	SPAC644.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.306993201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760875	2542055	2539564	278534	276125	SPAC6G9.03c	SPCC550.12	mug183	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871930985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760876	2542055	2542277	278534	278746	SPAC6G9.03c	SPAC17A5.02c	mug183	dbr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.079351195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760877	2542055	2538906	278534	275483	SPAC6G9.03c	SPCC1259.03	mug183	rpa12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.027084393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760878	2542055	2541250	278534	277764	SPAC6G9.03c	SPBC8D2.17	mug183	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195756379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760879	2542055	2540326	278534	276856	SPAC6G9.03c	SPBC2G5.06c	mug183	hmt2	-	cad1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455911676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760880	2542055	2541746	278534	278240	SPAC6G9.03c	SPAC20G4.04c	mug183	hus1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.249836547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760881	2542055	2541628	278534	278124	SPAC6G9.03c	SPAC110.02	mug183	pds5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.202517503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760882	2542055	2541175	278534	277689	SPAC6G9.03c	SPBC839.13c	mug183	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.034718359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760883	2542055	2541789	278534	278281	SPAC6G9.03c	SPAC23H4.08	mug183	iwr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.458722464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760884	2542055	2543087	278534	279520	SPAC6G9.03c	SPAC30C2.04	mug183	SPAC30C2.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.26303461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760885	2542055	2542424	278534	278886	SPAC6G9.03c	SPAC1805.14	mug183	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101983544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760886	2542055	2542094	278534	278571	SPAC6G9.03c	SPAC29B12.06c	mug183	rcd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.840294455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760887	2538926	2543637	275502	280051	SPCC306.07c	SPAC3H8.02	SPCC306.07c	csr102	-	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.038361065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760888	2538926	2539008	275502	275581	SPCC306.07c	SPCC584.03c	SPCC306.07c	SPCC584.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.134623178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760889	2538926	2540455	275502	276983	SPCC306.07c	SPBC215.05	SPCC306.07c	gpd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.76992226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760890	2538926	2541361	275502	277872	SPCC306.07c	SPBP8B7.10c	SPCC306.07c	utp16	-	SPBP8B7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.928136697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760891	2538926	2540893	275502	277409	SPCC306.07c	SPBC543.10	SPCC306.07c	get1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.326093489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760892	2538926	2541776	275502	278270	SPCC306.07c	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC306.07c	swd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.165379274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760893	2538926	2538841	275502	275422	SPCC306.07c	SPCC550.03c	SPCC306.07c	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.686542738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760894	2538926	2543378	275502	279800	SPCC306.07c	SPAC3H8.07c	SPCC306.07c	pac10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.594067002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760895	2538926	2542407	275502	278871	SPCC306.07c	SPAC19B12.06c	SPCC306.07c	SPAC19B12.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.150175944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760896	2538926	2540464	275502	276992	SPCC306.07c	SPBC23E6.02	SPCC306.07c	rrp2	-	SPBC23E6.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577203517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760897	2538926	2540699	275502	277223	SPCC306.07c	SPBC800.08	SPCC306.07c	gcd10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.831940373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760898	2538926	2542159	275502	278635	SPCC306.07c	SPAC1834.09	SPCC306.07c	mug51	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379054438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760899	2542462	2542207	278923	278682	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC19B12.11c	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573123169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760900	2542462	2541562	278923	278061	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC24B11.05	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC24B11.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.130036571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760901	2542462	2542577	278923	279033	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC19G12.15c	SPAC19B12.11c	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.002672333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760902	2542462	2542598	278923	279052	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC6G10.08	SPAC19B12.11c	idp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.37584498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760903	2542462	2540913	278923	277429	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.63026425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760904	2542462	2541570	278923	278067	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC6G9.09c	SPAC19B12.11c	rpl2401	-	rpl24|rpl24-01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384281321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760905	2542462	2542787	278923	279236	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC9G1.08c	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC9G1.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388566538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760906	2542462	2540524	278923	277052	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC21B10.08c	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.266159143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760907	2542462	2539930	278923	276474	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC19B12.11c	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513645436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760908	2542462	2541134	278923	277649	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC776.16	SPAC19B12.11c	mis20	-	SPBC776.16|eic2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87387637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760909	2542462	2543559	278923	279975	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC664.04c	SPAC19B12.11c	rps1602	-	rps16|rps16-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.719521361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760910	2542462	2539350	278923	275916	SPAC19B12.11c	SPCC24B10.17	SPAC19B12.11c	emp24	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.663861896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760911	2542462	2541345	278923	277856	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBP35G2.07	SPAC19B12.11c	ilv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.940478785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760912	2542462	2538806	278923	275387	SPAC19B12.11c	SPCC1840.09	SPAC19B12.11c	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.87110093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760913	2542462	3361436	278923	280512	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC1296.01c	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC1296.01c	-	SPAC22F3.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038256313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760914	2542462	2541286	278923	277799	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC9B6.11c	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC9B6.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864917125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760915	2542462	2541208	278923	277722	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC887.04c	SPAC19B12.11c	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44813369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760916	2542462	2540979	278923	277495	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC3H7.10	SPAC19B12.11c	elp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.197972429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760917	2542462	2540306	278923	276836	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC19B12.11c	ckb2	-	SPBC2G5.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.371468149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760918	2542462	2538833	278923	275414	SPAC19B12.11c	SPCP1E11.11	SPAC19B12.11c	puf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.916375791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760919	2542462	2540727	278923	277250	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC1921.03c	SPAC19B12.11c	mex67	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.950010856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760920	2542462	2542649	278923	279103	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC24C9.14	SPAC19B12.11c	otu1	-	mug141	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574357826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760921	2542462	2541522	278923	278023	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC23E2.01	SPAC19B12.11c	fep1	-	gaf2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.198483304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760922	2542462	2539352	278923	275918	SPAC19B12.11c	SPCC188.07	SPAC19B12.11c	ccq1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149087359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760923	2542462	2539100	278923	275672	SPAC19B12.11c	SPCC330.12c	SPAC19B12.11c	sdh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510625396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760924	2542462	2540893	278923	277409	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC543.10	SPAC19B12.11c	get1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385173187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760925	2542462	2541544	278923	278044	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC22G7.06c	SPAC19B12.11c	ura1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.132870904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760926	2542462	2542036	278923	278518	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC19B12.11c	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331548782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760927	2542462	2539056	278923	275629	SPAC19B12.11c	SPCC126.11c	SPAC19B12.11c	SPCC126.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442071324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760928	2542462	2541249	278923	277763	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC947.01	SPAC19B12.11c	alf1	-	SPBC947.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575660009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760929	2542462	2538770	278923	275353	SPAC19B12.11c	SPCC1753.02c	SPAC19B12.11c	git3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.646832237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760930	2542462	2541160	278923	277675	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC725.09c	SPAC19B12.11c	hob3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864069452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760931	2542462	2543483	278923	279903	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAPB2B4.02	SPAC19B12.11c	grx5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707067231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760932	2542462	2540348	278923	276877	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC19B12.11c	exo1	-	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.976430714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760933	2542462	2539733	278923	276285	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC19B12.11c	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992027657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760934	2542462	2543208	278923	279637	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC328.04	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC328.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638511583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760935	2542462	2542297	278923	278764	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC17H9.06c	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC17H9.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517868694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760936	2542462	2541943	278923	278430	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC222.07c	SPAC19B12.11c	hri2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388675479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760937	2542462	2542168	278923	278643	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC17A5.16	SPAC19B12.11c	ftp105	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.872324268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760938	2542462	2541876	278923	278366	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAP27G11.11c	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAP27G11.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.675524133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760939	2542462	2542651	278923	279105	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC24C9.12c	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC24C9.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935297834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760940	2542462	2540371	278923	276900	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC36.11	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC36.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.338903657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760941	2542462	2539815	278923	276365	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC1105.02c	SPAC19B12.11c	lys4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809776747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760942	2542462	2538849	278923	275430	SPAC19B12.11c	SPCC330.14c	SPAC19B12.11c	rpl2402	-	rpl24-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.98035187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760943	2542462	2539974	278923	276518	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC32H8.07	SPAC19B12.11c	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709365433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760944	2542462	2543311	278923	279735	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC977.15	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC977.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640816824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760945	2542462	2541009	278923	277524	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC428.04	SPAC19B12.11c	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.004371514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760946	2542462	2542056	278923	278535	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC6G9.14	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC6G9.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511852521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760947	2542462	2543443	278923	279863	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC19B12.11c	snt2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.275145708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760948	2542462	2539317	278923	275883	SPAC19B12.11c	SPCC16A11.08	SPAC19B12.11c	atg20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04808966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760949	2542462	2538690	278923	275275	SPAC19B12.11c	SPCC1393.05	SPAC19B12.11c	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513869074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760950	2542462	2542255	278923	278725	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC57A7.08	SPAC19B12.11c	pzh1	-	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576109159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760951	2542462	2541017	278923	277532	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC36.07	SPAC19B12.11c	elp1	-	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984426674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760952	2542462	3361389	278923	280465	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC977.13c	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC977.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.198435967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760953	2542462	2539555	278923	276116	SPAC19B12.11c	SPCC4B3.08	SPAC19B12.11c	lsg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.374535772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760954	2542462	2539246	278923	275816	SPAC19B12.11c	SPCC18.13	SPAC19B12.11c	SPCC18.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.190577197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760955	2542462	2543136	278923	279568	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC1348.07	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC1348.07	-	SPAC1348.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.562783815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760956	2542462	2542940	278923	279381	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC31A2.12	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC31A2.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330914942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760957	2542462	2540531	278923	277059	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC23E6.08	SPAC19B12.11c	sat1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.125210178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760958	2542462	2540733	278923	277256	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC4.01	SPAC19B12.11c	dni2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387383409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760959	2542462	2540725	278923	277248	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC215.14c	SPAC19B12.11c	vps20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.9793026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760960	2542462	2540304	278923	276834	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC354.13	SPAC19B12.11c	rga6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32099576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760961	2542462	2540699	278923	277223	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC800.08	SPAC19B12.11c	gcd10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.776017016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760962	2542462	2542222	278923	278695	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC19B12.11c	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509619871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760963	2542462	2543420	278923	279842	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC3H1.04c	SPAC19B12.11c	mdm31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571437536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760964	2542462	2540297	278923	276828	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC24C6.08c	SPAC19B12.11c	bhd1	-	bhd	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576336012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760965	2542462	2543046	278923	279481	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC3C7.10	SPAC19B12.11c	pex13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.048977868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760966	2542462	2543044	278923	279479	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC3C7.12	SPAC19B12.11c	tip1	-	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.200895618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760967	2542462	2542386	278923	278850	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC1805.01c	SPAC19B12.11c	ppk6	-	SPAPJ736.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440623105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760968	2542462	2539170	278923	275741	SPAC19B12.11c	SPCC306.02c	SPAC19B12.11c	SPCC306.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.742090269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760969	2542462	2539375	278923	275941	SPAC19B12.11c	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC19B12.11c	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.978321461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760970	2542462	2540146	278923	276683	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.846423568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760971	2542462	2539189	278923	275760	SPAC19B12.11c	SPCC1682.16	SPAC19B12.11c	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323033744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760972	2542462	2539169	278923	275740	SPAC19B12.11c	SPCC1235.11	SPAC19B12.11c	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.199789877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760973	2542462	2541806	278923	278297	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC19B12.11c	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57604963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760974	2542462	2543327	278923	279750	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC1D4.06c	SPAC19B12.11c	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.772589079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760975	2542462	2543372	278923	279794	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC19B12.11c	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.956544055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760976	2542462	2539710	278923	276263	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC1683.08	SPAC19B12.11c	ght4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32625866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760977	2542462	2543644	278923	280058	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAPB1A10.03	SPAC19B12.11c	nxt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.373161253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760978	2542462	2543333	278923	279756	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC694.02	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC694.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.547819436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760979	2542462	2542890	278923	279334	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC13G6.14	SPAC19B12.11c	aps1	-	SPAC24B11.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.98760231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760980	2542462	2539148	278923	275720	SPAC19B12.11c	SPCC132.04c	SPAC19B12.11c	gdh2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633830621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760981	2542462	2540787	278923	277306	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC19B12.11c	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329528678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760982	2542462	2541116	278923	277631	SPAC19B12.11c	SPBC609.04	SPAC19B12.11c	caf5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87139544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760983	2542462	2542571	278923	279027	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC589.02c	SPAC19B12.11c	med13	-	spTrap240|srb9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.382031522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760984	2541378	2542207	277889	278682	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC17H9.10c	ubp3	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.297305313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760985	2541378	2542585	277889	279040	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC31A2.13c	ubp3	sft1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842440549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760986	2541378	2539949	277889	276493	SPBP8B7.21	SPBC1703.04	ubp3	mlh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441630839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760987	2541378	2542293	277889	278761	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC17G8.14c	ubp3	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.11905107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760988	2541378	2538896	277889	275474	SPBP8B7.21	SPCC584.11c	ubp3	SPCC584.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.270773754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760989	2541378	2539930	277889	276474	SPBP8B7.21	SPBC1198.11c	ubp3	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.846935337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760990	2541378	2543376	277889	279798	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC3H1.06c	ubp3	SPAC3H1.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.409809918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760991	2541378	2543432	277889	279852	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC4G8.05	ubp3	ppk14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.800315435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760992	2541378	2542758	277889	279208	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC15E1.02c	ubp3	SPAC15E1.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322568707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760993	2541378	2542677	277889	279130	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC26F1.10c	ubp3	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.492124293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760994	2541378	2538775	277889	275357	SPBP8B7.21	SPCC23B6.05c	ubp3	ssb3	-	rpa3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.243631639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760995	2541378	2541964	277889	278450	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC2F3.08	ubp3	sut1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57279997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760996	2541378	2540220	277889	276753	SPBP8B7.21	SPBC337.03	ubp3	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040126473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760997	2541378	2540463	277889	276991	SPBP8B7.21	SPBC2F12.15c	ubp3	pfa3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571256782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760998	2541378	2543029	277889	279465	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC11G7.01	ubp3	SPAC11G7.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573435546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
760999	2541378	2540790	277889	277309	SPBP8B7.21	SPBC6B1.05c	ubp3	atg7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870757761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761000	2541378	2541004	277889	277519	SPBP8B7.21	SPBC3F6.01c	ubp3	SPBC3F6.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.815057496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761001	2541378	2539381	277889	275947	SPBP8B7.21	SPCC1739.10	ubp3	mug33	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979279803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761002	2541378	2540825	277889	277343	SPBP8B7.21	SPBC428.08c	ubp3	clr4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.246876714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761003	2541378	2542665	277889	279118	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC10F6.08c	ubp3	nht10	-	nht1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384859139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761004	2541378	2542036	277889	278518	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC23A1.19c	ubp3	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.024950456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761005	2541378	2539388	277889	275953	SPBP8B7.21	SPCC24B10.12	ubp3	cgi121	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.889296408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761006	2541378	2542394	277889	278858	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC31G5.12c	ubp3	maf1	-	n150	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922389918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761007	2541378	2543020	277889	279456	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC10F6.13c	ubp3	SPAC10F6.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.81401706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761008	2541378	2542499	277889	278958	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC1F12.04c	ubp3	SPAC1F12.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.62725874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761009	2541378	2541249	277889	277763	SPBP8B7.21	SPBC947.01	ubp3	alf1	-	SPBC947.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039398557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761010	2541378	2542513	277889	278971	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC1952.05	ubp3	gcn5	-	kat2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990171069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761011	2541378	2542646	277889	279100	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC11H11.05c	ubp3	fta6	-	sma6	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.16156351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761012	2541378	2541776	277889	278270	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC23H3.05c	ubp3	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.294386754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761013	2541378	2542707	277889	279160	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC25G10.03	ubp3	zip1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.197611978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761014	2541378	3361560	277889	280636	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC14C4.09	ubp3	agn1	-	SPAC14C4.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.120229704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761015	2541378	2540673	277889	277198	SPBP8B7.21	SPBC1D7.03	ubp3	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.257328334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761016	2541378	2541911	277889	278401	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC212.04c	ubp3	SPAC212.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143507234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761017	2541378	2541496	277889	277998	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC23D3.09	ubp3	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.316606075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761018	2541378	2540836	277889	277354	SPBP8B7.21	SPBC18H10.19	ubp3	vps38	-	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.829417463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761019	2541378	2541900	277889	278390	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC23H4.17c	ubp3	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.971166823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761020	2541378	2541009	277889	277524	SPBP8B7.21	SPBC428.04	ubp3	apq12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988088607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761021	2541378	2541536	277889	278036	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC1071.02	ubp3	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320272944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761022	2541378	2539847	277889	276395	SPBP8B7.21	SPBC530.14c	ubp3	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.895236629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761023	2541378	2541614	277889	278111	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC29A4.20	ubp3	elp3	-	kat9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.923764775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761024	2541378	2541488	277889	277990	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC227.17c	ubp3	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988487985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761025	2541378	2543515	277889	279933	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC4F10.14c	ubp3	btf3	-	btt1|egd1|nac2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040147484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761026	2541378	2542748	277889	279198	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC15A10.09c	ubp3	pun1	-	SPAC15A10.09c|sur7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.689004935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761027	2541378	2538848	277889	275429	SPBP8B7.21	SPCC613.12c	ubp3	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.896988213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761028	2541378	3361520	277889	280596	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC1610.02c	ubp3	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.666114844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761029	2541378	2541713	277889	278208	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC3A12.12	ubp3	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.073810132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761030	2541378	2542992	277889	279430	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC1071.09c	ubp3	SPAC1071.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440362327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761031	2541378	2542769	277889	279219	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC15A10.10	ubp3	mde6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.683816519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761032	2541378	2540498	277889	277026	SPBP8B7.21	SPBC27.02c	ubp3	ask1	-	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98494848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761033	2541378	2542401	277889	278865	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC1142.02c	ubp3	SPAC1142.02c	-	SPAC17G6.19c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.71888357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761034	2541378	2543096	277889	279528	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC977.05c	ubp3	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.646311578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761035	2541378	2543160	277889	279591	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC31A2.14	ubp3	bun107	-	wdr48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.027914059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761036	2541378	2540115	277889	276652	SPBP8B7.21	SPBC1778.02	ubp3	rap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.406738021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761037	2541378	2541531	277889	278031	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC25A8.01c	ubp3	fft3	-	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.074251671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761038	2541378	2542418	277889	278881	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC1805.07c	ubp3	dad2	-	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.020224303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761039	2541378	2540677	277889	277202	SPBP8B7.21	SPBC21B10.03c	ubp3	ath1	-	SPBC21B10.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039080607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761040	2541378	2541789	277889	278281	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC23H4.08	ubp3	iwr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.559015559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761041	2541378	2542786	277889	279235	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC15A10.07	ubp3	SPAC15A10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189334008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761042	2541378	2541941	277889	278428	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC20H4.03c	ubp3	tfs1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.857040833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761043	2541378	2543387	277889	279809	SPBP8B7.21	SPAPB1E7.02c	ubp3	mcl1	-	slr3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.506409755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761044	2541378	2542175	277889	278650	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC1F3.02c	ubp3	mkh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.49834406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761045	2541378	2542399	277889	278863	SPBP8B7.21	SPAC1805.10	ubp3	SPAC1805.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.982513625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761046	2541585	2540161	278082	276696	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC13E7.03c	man1	SPBC13E7.03c	heh2|mug61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817183991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761047	2541585	2542107	278082	278583	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC30.01c	man1	sec72	heh2|mug61	sec7b|sec702	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.382074355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761048	2541585	2539925	278082	276469	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC16H5.13	man1	SPBC16H5.13	heh2|mug61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934789361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761049	2541585	2541789	278082	278281	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC23H4.08	man1	iwr1	heh2|mug61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.945732517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761050	2541585	2538792	278082	275373	SPAC14C4.05c	SPCP1E11.10	man1	SPCP1E11.10	heh2|mug61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.648126999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761051	2542194	2539898	278669	276444	SPAC17G6.17	SPBC12D12.07c	pof8	trx2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.062958051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761052	2542194	2540452	278669	276980	SPAC17G6.17	SPBC2A9.11c	pof8	iss9	-	SPBC2A9.11c|SPBC2D10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.912459209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761053	2542194	2541186	278669	277700	SPAC17G6.17	SPBC725.01	pof8	SPBC725.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.066067414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761054	2542194	2538762	278669	275345	SPAC17G6.17	SPCC306.04c	pof8	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.814561076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761055	2542194	2540800	278669	277319	SPAC17G6.17	SPBC409.20c	pof8	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783444071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761056	2542194	2538792	278669	275373	SPAC17G6.17	SPCP1E11.10	pof8	SPCP1E11.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.410012451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761057	2540099	2542207	276637	278682	SPBC16H5.11c	SPAC17H9.10c	skb1	ddb1	rmt5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.677584768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761058	2540099	2540160	276637	276695	SPBC16H5.11c	SPBC1773.17c	skb1	SPBC1773.17c	rmt5	SPBP26C9.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379944145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761059	2540099	2542246	276637	278716	SPBC16H5.11c	SPAC17H9.12c	skb1	SPAC17H9.12c	rmt5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.210899429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761060	2540099	2542311	276637	278777	SPBC16H5.11c	SPAC16A10.05c	skb1	dad1	rmt5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86335113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761061	2540099	2541713	276637	278208	SPBC16H5.11c	SPAC3A12.12	skb1	atp11	rmt5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.226821217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761062	2540099	2539205	276637	275775	SPBC16H5.11c	SPCC4B3.15	skb1	mid1	rmt5	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330621136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761063	2540099	2539178	276637	275749	SPBC16H5.11c	SPCC1682.14	skb1	rpl1902	rmt5	rpl19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.486176921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761064	2542933	2541200	279374	277714	SPAPYUG7.06	SPBC8D2.03c	sdu1	hhf2	mug67|hag1	ams3|h4.2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.892662501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761065	2542933	2540348	279374	276877	SPAPYUG7.06	SPBC29A10.05	sdu1	exo1	mug67|hag1	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.313147379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761066	2542933	2539715	279374	276268	SPAPYUG7.06	SPBC1778.09	sdu1	SPBC1778.09	mug67|hag1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64215249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761067	2542933	2540930	279374	277446	SPAPYUG7.06	SPBC354.10	sdu1	def1	mug67|hag1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931644359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761068	2542933	2542453	279374	278914	SPAPYUG7.06	SPAC186.01	sdu1	pfl9	mug67|hag1	SPAC186.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.254785021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761069	2542933	2543304	279374	279728	SPAPYUG7.06	SPAC6B12.12	sdu1	tom70	mug67|hag1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.252552769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761070	2542933	2540992	279374	277508	SPAPYUG7.06	SPBC342.05	sdu1	crb2	mug67|hag1	rhp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.850874184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761071	2542933	2542716	279374	279169	SPAPYUG7.06	SPAC25H1.07	sdu1	emc1	mug67|hag1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.921531397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761072	2543443	2540105	279863	276642	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC106.04	snt2	ada1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.550162321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761073	2543443	2541512	279863	278013	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC11E3.08c	snt2	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.115185472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761074	2543443	2542358	279863	278823	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC1782.09c	snt2	clp1	-	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.159972682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761075	2543443	2542378	279863	278842	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC1805.04	snt2	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.824133105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761076	2543443	3361561	279863	280637	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC11E3.01c	snt2	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.6677576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761077	2543443	2540347	279863	276876	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC30B4.08	snt2	eri1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.330446843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761078	2543443	2540686	279863	277211	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC21D10.10	snt2	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.30279809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761079	2543443	2542677	279863	279130	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC26F1.10c	snt2	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709024998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761080	2543443	2539564	279863	276125	SPAC3H1.12c	SPCC550.12	snt2	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.476933967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761081	2543443	2540929	279863	277445	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC354.03	snt2	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.859358323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761082	2543443	2542318	279863	278784	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC16C9.05	snt2	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.161191714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761083	2543443	2540595	279863	277121	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC21C3.02c	snt2	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.235502646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761084	2543443	2539244	279863	275814	SPAC3H1.12c	SPCC1672.06c	snt2	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.216630762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761085	2543443	2543319	279863	279743	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC6B12.09	snt2	trm10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.132160724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761086	2543443	2538906	279863	275483	SPAC3H1.12c	SPCC1259.03	snt2	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.827802288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761087	2543443	3361543	279863	280619	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC9.13c	snt2	cwf16	-	SPAPJ735.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.137371151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761088	2543443	2539023	279863	275596	SPAC3H1.12c	SPCC594.05c	snt2	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.623190508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761089	2543443	2542311	279863	278777	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC16A10.05c	snt2	dad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.372058162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761090	2543443	2540797	279863	277316	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC18H10.11c	snt2	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.434680846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761091	2543443	2541776	279863	278270	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC23H3.05c	snt2	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.988913186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761092	2543443	2541038	279863	277553	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC29A10.01	snt2	ccr1	-	SPBC365.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506734319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761093	2543443	2540352	279863	276881	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC215.03c	snt2	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.823531096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761094	2543443	2539733	279863	276285	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC16E9.12c	snt2	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.702590186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761095	2543443	2541578	279863	278075	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC25B8.05	snt2	deg1	-	SPAC25B8.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.548881553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761096	2543443	2541496	279863	277998	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC23D3.09	snt2	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.72013458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761097	2543443	2543667	279863	280081	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC4H3.02c	snt2	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.880888278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761098	2543443	2543643	279863	280057	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC3G9.07c	snt2	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.290467925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761099	2543443	2541899	279863	278389	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC22E12.11c	snt2	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.261076243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761100	2543443	2539667	279863	276222	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC13G1.08c	snt2	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.071790054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761101	2543443	2542126	279863	278602	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC1B3.05	snt2	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.064105939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761102	2543443	2539408	279863	275973	SPAC3H1.12c	SPCC576.12c	snt2	mhf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.180347673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761103	2543443	2541009	279863	277524	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC428.04	snt2	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.430282958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761104	2543443	2539953	279863	276497	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC1709.11c	snt2	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.595491772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761105	2543443	2541536	279863	278036	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC1071.02	snt2	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.393994682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761106	2543443	2540967	279863	277483	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC36B7.08c	snt2	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.803650042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761107	2543443	2540599	279863	277125	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC29A3.10c	snt2	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.629177429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761108	2543443	2543315	279863	279739	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC6B12.07c	snt2	SPAC6B12.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994550079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761109	2543443	2541488	279863	277990	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC227.17c	snt2	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.939637261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761110	2543443	2541337	279863	277848	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBP35G2.13c	snt2	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.76532205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761111	2543443	2543254	279863	279682	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC1006.03c	snt2	red1	-	iss3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.366118395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761112	2543443	2540821	279863	277339	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC800.03	snt2	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.290197521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761113	2543443	2542170	279863	278645	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC17G8.13c	snt2	mst2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573504605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761114	2543443	2539354	279863	275920	SPAC3H1.12c	SPCC4F11.03c	snt2	SPCC4F11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.485911215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761115	2543443	2543663	279863	280077	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC644.07	snt2	SPAC644.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3438159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761116	2543443	2538762	279863	275345	SPAC3H1.12c	SPCC306.04c	snt2	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.386323579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761117	2543443	2539555	279863	276116	SPAC3H1.12c	SPCC4B3.08	snt2	lsg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.139978357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761118	2543443	2540061	279863	276599	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC119.12	snt2	rud3	-	SPBC119.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512683616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761119	2543443	2540498	279863	277026	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC27.02c	snt2	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.622862174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761120	2543443	2538966	279863	275540	SPAC3H1.12c	SPCC18.10	snt2	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.072130651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761121	2543443	2540531	279863	277059	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC23E6.08	snt2	sat1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647049164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761122	2543443	2541470	279863	277972	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAPYUG7.04c	snt2	rpb9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.132993527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761123	2543443	2542418	279863	278881	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC1805.07c	snt2	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.11908807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761124	2543443	2542826	279863	279273	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC13G6.09	snt2	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.623049003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761125	2543443	2541789	279863	278281	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC23H4.08	snt2	iwr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.977239297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761126	2543443	2539726	279863	276278	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC13E7.08c	snt2	leo1	-	SPBC13E7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.307658224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761127	2543443	2539375	279863	275941	SPAC3H1.12c	SPCC4G3.11	snt2	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505636324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761128	2543443	2542716	279863	279169	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC25H1.07	snt2	emc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.774670516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761129	2543443	2539700	279863	276253	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC1685.15c	snt2	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516536987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761130	2543443	2543387	279863	279809	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAPB1E7.02c	snt2	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.37457893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761131	2543443	2543070	279863	279503	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC2H10.02c	snt2	SPAC2H10.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.88422663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761132	2543443	2541124	279863	277639	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC646.02	snt2	cwf11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.170439322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761133	2541990	2542072	278474	278549	SPAC20H4.02	SPAP32A8.03c	dsc3	bop1	-	SPAP32A8.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.033855102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761134	2541990	2540279	278474	276810	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC3B8.04c	dsc3	SPBC3B8.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445859177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761135	2541990	2539147	278474	275719	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC622.12c	dsc3	gdh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578432091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761136	2541990	2541475	278474	277977	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC24B11.09	dsc3	mpc2	-	SPAC24B11.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.768773683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761137	2541990	2540105	278474	276642	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC106.04	dsc3	ada1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.564262424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761138	2541990	2542585	278474	279040	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC31A2.13c	dsc3	sft1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.811161513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761139	2541990	2543637	278474	280051	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC3H8.02	dsc3	csr102	-	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.677413415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761140	2541990	2540913	278474	277429	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC56F2.08c	dsc3	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.050482741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761141	2541990	2539684	278474	276239	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC16A3.16	dsc3	SPBC16A3.16	-	cwc27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769472285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761142	2541990	2541552	278474	278051	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC1142.08	dsc3	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.723176825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761143	2541990	2540524	278474	277052	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC21B10.08c	dsc3	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.42087662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761144	2541990	2539227	278474	275797	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC191.11	dsc3	inv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.458262569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761145	2541990	2539035	278474	275608	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC794.09c	dsc3	tef101	-	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440716097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761146	2541990	2541621	278474	278118	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC29A4.17c	dsc3	SPAC29A4.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6469951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761147	2541990	2543578	278474	279993	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC9.10	dsc3	thi9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.837007025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761148	2541990	2539930	278474	276474	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC1198.11c	dsc3	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.318546782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761149	2541990	2539939	278474	276483	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC11G11.01	dsc3	fis1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.460939654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761150	2541990	2542149	278474	278625	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC57A10.06	dsc3	mug15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.448485019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761151	2541990	2542103	278474	278579	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC31G5.11	dsc3	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.495869233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761152	2541990	2539420	278474	275985	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC970.07c	dsc3	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.614599553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761153	2541990	2541205	278474	277719	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC839.02	dsc3	SPBC839.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580120802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761154	2541990	2539463	278474	276026	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC550.11	dsc3	SPCC550.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197058868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761155	2541990	2539235	278474	275805	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC1682.15	dsc3	mug122	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.183609359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761156	2541990	2540029	278474	276573	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC16A3.01	dsc3	spn3	-	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.307895575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761157	2541990	2543043	278474	279478	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC3F10.13	dsc3	ucp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.19298442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761158	2541990	2538801	278474	275382	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC285.13c	dsc3	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.652981194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761159	2541990	2539249	278474	275819	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC1450.05c	dsc3	rox3	-	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.303491016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761160	2541990	2539576	278474	276136	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC794.01c	dsc3	zwf2	-	SPCC794.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.395040744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761161	2541990	2543453	278474	279873	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC3G9.03	dsc3	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.821200577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761162	2541990	2541964	278474	278450	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC2F3.08	dsc3	sut1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.769675608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761163	2541990	2541026	278474	277541	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC337.09	dsc3	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392208958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761164	2541990	2541558	278474	278057	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC1F7.08	dsc3	fio1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.561497543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761165	2541990	2539302	278474	275870	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC126.09	dsc3	zip2	-	SPCC126.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.116621576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761166	2541990	2542969	278474	279409	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC4G8.10	dsc3	gos1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.476459846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761167	2541990	2542220	278474	278694	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC1A6.03c	dsc3	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049350697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761168	2541990	2539129	278474	275701	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC338.14	dsc3	ado1	-	SPCC338.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381769354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761169	2541990	2540263	278474	276794	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC32H8.02c	dsc3	nep2	-	mug120|pi021|SPACTOKYO_453.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.768586166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761170	2541990	2543108	278474	279540	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC3A12.13c	dsc3	SPAC3A12.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258069932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761171	2541990	2543551	278474	279968	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC4G8.06c	dsc3	trm12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443730777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761172	2541990	2540714	278474	277237	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC19C2.04c	dsc3	ubp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.572139298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761173	2541990	2541663	278474	278159	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC22G7.08	dsc3	ppk8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381806928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761174	2541990	2538845	278474	275426	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC1235.13	dsc3	ght6	-	meu12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.319322856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761175	2541990	2542300	278474	278767	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC1687.22c	dsc3	puf3	-	SPAC222.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154466966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761176	2541990	2539310	278474	275877	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC285.17	dsc3	spp27	-	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384629472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761177	2541990	3361461	278474	280537	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC11H11.01	dsc3	sst6	-	cps23	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577284166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761178	2541990	2539051	278474	275624	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC1183.11	dsc3	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.181560699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761179	2541990	2539870	278474	276416	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC1709.18	dsc3	tif452	-	SPBC409.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.457818789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761180	2541990	2541264	278474	277778	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC902.06	dsc3	mto2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.565906672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761181	2541990	2541038	278474	277553	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC29A10.01	dsc3	ccr1	-	SPBC365.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.015082918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761182	2541990	3361491	278474	280567	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC1805.08	dsc3	dlc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383121302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761183	2541990	2539990	278474	276534	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC1289.14	dsc3	SPBC1289.14	-	SPBC8E4.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.371951485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761184	2541990	2539046	278474	275619	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC1223.12c	dsc3	meu10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.435058147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761185	2541990	2542543	278474	279000	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC30D11.11	dsc3	SPAC30D11.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.315082379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761186	2541990	2543363	278474	279785	SPAC20H4.02	SPAPB24D3.09c	dsc3	pdr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.261108704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761187	2541990	2539857	278474	276404	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC1604.20c	dsc3	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.545722385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761188	2541990	2542357	278474	278822	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC1782.07	dsc3	qcr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383093301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761189	2541990	2540086	278474	276624	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC16H5.12c	dsc3	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.971716291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761190	2541990	2542857	278474	279303	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC144.06	dsc3	apl5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.570412761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761191	2541990	2542691	278474	279144	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC26H5.07c	dsc3	SPAC26H5.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.559433696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761192	2541990	2540665	278474	277190	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC83.02c	dsc3	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.183697254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761193	2541990	2538873	278474	275452	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC306.11	dsc3	SPCC306.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.654955986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761194	2541990	2538774	278474	275356	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC162.06c	dsc3	SPCC162.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.710946045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761195	2541990	2542710	278474	279163	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC750.08c	dsc3	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.69006971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761196	2541990	2542419	278474	278882	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC17G6.05c	dsc3	bro1	-	SPAC17G6.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.250803156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761197	2541990	2539850	278474	276398	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC15D4.07c	dsc3	atg9	-	apg9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816229851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761198	2541990	2543253	278474	279681	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC8C9.05	dsc3	SPAC8C9.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.13189388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761199	2541990	2543236	278474	279664	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC8C9.04	dsc3	SPAC8C9.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.057922633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761200	2541990	2539958	278474	276502	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC1718.07c	dsc3	zfs1	-	moc4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.879791451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761201	2541990	2542254	278474	278724	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC30D11.04c	dsc3	nup124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.859256428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761202	2541990	3361403	278474	280479	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC27D7.12c	dsc3	but1	-	SPAC27D7.12|mug107|prx	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778451028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761203	2541990	2543301	278474	279726	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC977.17	dsc3	SPAC977.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.278021997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761204	2541990	2542519	278474	278977	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC19G12.08	dsc3	scs7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.921424635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761205	2541990	2540776	278474	277296	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC428.07	dsc3	meu6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.735463243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761206	2541990	2541009	278474	277524	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC428.04	dsc3	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.314668946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761207	2541990	2543683	278474	280097	SPAC20H4.02	SPAPB1E7.04c	dsc3	SPAPB1E7.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.259510457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761208	2541990	2540201	278474	276734	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC13A2.04c	dsc3	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.461658571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761209	2541990	2541708	278474	278203	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC31A2.02	dsc3	trm112	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.667599783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761210	2541990	2541410	278474	277918	SPAC20H4.02	SPBPB2B2.17c	dsc3	SPBPB2B2.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.554581383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761211	2541990	2542753	278474	279203	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC1687.09	dsc3	SPAC1687.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.063212314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761212	2541990	2539427	278474	275992	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC663.15c	dsc3	SPCC663.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.020366038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761213	2541990	2540357	278474	276886	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC2F12.05c	dsc3	SPBC2F12.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453890416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761214	2541990	2538884	278474	275462	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC1393.08	dsc3	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444295781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761215	2541990	2539213	278474	275783	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC285.10c	dsc3	SPCC285.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.509740908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761216	2541990	2542255	278474	278725	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC57A7.08	dsc3	pzh1	-	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.806883477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761217	2541990	2542781	278474	279230	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC57A10.12c	dsc3	ura3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.841620202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761218	2541990	2540930	278474	277446	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC354.10	dsc3	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.940228234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761219	2541990	2543193	278474	279622	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC3F10.11c	dsc3	abc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.380112839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761220	2541990	2538848	278474	275429	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC613.12c	dsc3	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.62223262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761221	2541990	2541525	278474	278025	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC27D7.02c	dsc3	SPAC27D7.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.495207977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761222	2541990	2540001	278474	276545	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC1289.13c	dsc3	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.110835371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761223	2541990	2538762	278474	275345	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC306.04c	dsc3	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.463949367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761224	2541990	2539555	278474	276116	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC4B3.08	dsc3	lsg1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814844793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761225	2541990	2542327	278474	278793	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC16C9.06c	dsc3	upf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.973629724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761226	2541990	2540061	278474	276599	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC119.12	dsc3	rud3	-	SPBC119.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329727789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761227	2541990	2539600	278474	276158	SPAC20H4.02	SPCP1E11.03	dsc3	mug170	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572023451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761228	2541990	2543096	278474	279528	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC977.05c	dsc3	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450739924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761229	2541990	2540725	278474	277248	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC215.14c	dsc3	vps20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.575421054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761230	2541990	2539013	278474	275586	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC364.03	dsc3	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.609759941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761231	2541990	2540829	278474	277347	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC800.09	dsc3	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.377444735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761232	2541990	2540677	278474	277202	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC21B10.03c	dsc3	ath1	-	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.828389291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761233	2541990	2541404	278474	277913	SPAC20H4.02	SPBPB2B2.18	dsc3	SPBPB2B2.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.989985409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761234	2541990	2541380	278474	277891	SPAC20H4.02	SPBPB2B2.13	dsc3	gal1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.972052592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761235	2541990	2540333	278474	276863	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC21B10.07	dsc3	SPBC21B10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.847264882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761236	2541990	2540146	278474	276683	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC17A3.06	dsc3	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.056947902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761237	2541990	2542423	278474	278885	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC17G6.08	dsc3	pep7	-	vac1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.333598448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761238	2541990	2541675	278474	278171	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC22F8.12c	dsc3	shf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844071723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761239	2541990	2541357	278474	277868	SPAC20H4.02	SPBPB7E8.01	dsc3	SPBPB7E8.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.089071116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761240	2541990	2541774	278474	278268	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC22E12.05c	dsc3	rer1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.922401027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761241	2541990	2543327	278474	279750	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC1D4.06c	dsc3	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392006215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761242	2541990	2540828	278474	277346	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC4B4.06	dsc3	vps25	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.492356686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761243	2541990	2539743	278474	276295	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC16A3.08c	dsc3	oga1	-	SPBC16A3.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.219151735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761244	2541990	2543333	278474	279756	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC694.02	dsc3	SPAC694.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.273148321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761245	2541990	2540208	278474	276741	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC9B6.03	dsc3	SPBC9B6.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.436513226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761246	2541990	2542617	278474	279071	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC13A11.01c	dsc3	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049129393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761247	2541990	2540787	278474	277306	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC1921.07c	dsc3	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.752312224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761248	2540866	2543565	277383	279981	SPBC4C3.12	SPAPB24D3.04c	sep1	mag1	SPBC4C3.05	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.108793775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761249	2540866	2541257	277383	277771	SPBC4C3.12	SPBP23A10.14c	sep1	ell1	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.092381989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761250	2540866	2543306	277383	279730	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC56F8.14c	sep1	mug115	SPBC4C3.05	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819918261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761251	2540866	2542358	277383	278823	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC1782.09c	sep1	clp1	SPBC4C3.05	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.888844567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761252	2540866	2540528	277383	277056	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC18H10.04c	sep1	sce3	SPBC4C3.05	tif48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445948163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761253	2540866	2538896	277383	275474	SPBC4C3.12	SPCC584.11c	sep1	SPCC584.11c	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.687575313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761254	2540866	2539930	277383	276474	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC1198.11c	sep1	reb1	SPBC4C3.05	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.432173016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761255	2540866	3361561	277383	280637	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC11E3.01c	sep1	swr1	SPBC4C3.05	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.626714393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761256	2540866	2539008	277383	275581	SPBC4C3.12	SPCC584.03c	sep1	SPCC584.03c	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.396605582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761257	2540866	2541853	277383	278344	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC2F3.11	sep1	SPAC2F3.11	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.186190701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761258	2540866	2541117	277383	277632	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC646.13	sep1	sds23	SPBC4C3.05	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.455748965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761259	2540866	2543652	277383	280066	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC4H3.03c	sep1	SPAC4H3.03c	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.496407532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761260	2540866	2538922	277383	275499	SPBC4C3.12	SPCC16C4.10	sep1	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.46178755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761261	2540866	2539226	277383	275796	SPBC4C3.12	SPCC16C4.20c	sep1	SPCC16C4.20c	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.117010478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761262	2540866	2542468	277383	278929	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC1D4.09c	sep1	rtf2	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.943567349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761263	2540866	2542677	277383	279130	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC26F1.10c	sep1	pyp1	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.758857689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761264	2540866	2540979	277383	277495	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC3H7.10	sep1	elp6	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.34617141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761265	2540866	2541058	277383	277573	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC3H7.09	sep1	erf2	SPBC4C3.05	mug142	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.80715184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761266	2540866	2541994	277383	278478	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC26A3.14c	sep1	SPAC26A3.14c	SPBC4C3.05	SPAC23A6.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.800258041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761267	2540866	2539564	277383	276125	SPBC4C3.12	SPCC550.12	sep1	arp6	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.442859351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761268	2540866	2540220	277383	276753	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC337.03	sep1	rhn1	SPBC4C3.05	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.834036313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761269	2540866	2539302	277383	275870	SPBC4C3.12	SPCC126.09	sep1	zip2	SPBC4C3.05	SPCC126.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931558204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761270	2540866	2542318	277383	278784	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC16C9.05	sep1	cph1	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.272294138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761271	2540866	2540595	277383	277121	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC21C3.02c	sep1	dep1	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.438417292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761272	2540866	2543108	277383	279540	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC3A12.13c	sep1	SPAC3A12.13c	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.849147924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761273	2540866	2539244	277383	275814	SPBC4C3.12	SPCC1672.06c	sep1	asp1	SPBC4C3.05	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.135813329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761274	2540866	2540059	277383	276597	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC1198.01	sep1	fmd2	SPBC4C3.05	SPBC1198.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.31167837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761275	2540866	2543551	277383	279968	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC4G8.06c	sep1	trm12	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.766023274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761276	2540866	2543563	277383	279979	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC664.02c	sep1	arp8	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.203701102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761277	2540866	2538906	277383	275483	SPBC4C3.12	SPCC1259.03	sep1	rpa12	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504690939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761278	2540866	2542034	277383	278516	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC27E2.04c	sep1	mug155	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.332127031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761279	2540866	2539478	277383	276041	SPBC4C3.12	SPCC550.07	sep1	SPCC550.07	SPBC4C3.05	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809273082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761280	2540866	2539023	277383	275596	SPBC4C3.12	SPCC594.05c	sep1	spf1	SPBC4C3.05	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.990090196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761281	2540866	2542268	277383	278737	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC17A5.07c	sep1	ulp2	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.264564391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761282	2540866	2539467	277383	276030	SPBC4C3.12	SPCC417.07c	sep1	mto1	SPBC4C3.05	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.056916673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761283	2540866	2539388	277383	275953	SPBC4C3.12	SPCC24B10.12	sep1	cgi121	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779914386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761284	2540866	2540906	277383	277422	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC365.20c	sep1	pnc1	SPBC4C3.05	SPBC557.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507463062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761285	2540866	2541801	277383	278292	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC2F7.08c	sep1	snf5	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.176925163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761286	2540866	2538770	277383	275353	SPBC4C3.12	SPCC1753.02c	sep1	git3	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.430865105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761287	2540866	2542776	277383	279225	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC167.01	sep1	ire1	SPBC4C3.05	ppk4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873184785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761288	2540866	2543412	277383	279834	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC637.07	sep1	moe1	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.670777343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761289	2540866	2543313	277383	279737	SPBC4C3.12	SPAPJ691.03	sep1	SPAPJ691.03	SPBC4C3.05	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042819769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761290	2540866	2543667	277383	280081	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC4H3.02c	sep1	swc3	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.140514859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761291	2540866	2539603	277383	276161	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC1289.06c	sep1	ppr8	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.695911831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761292	2540866	2539168	277383	275739	SPBC4C3.12	SPCC1620.08	sep1	SPCC1620.08	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442474399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761293	2540866	2542357	277383	278822	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC1782.07	sep1	qcr8	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.382688129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761294	2540866	2542651	277383	279105	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC24C9.12c	sep1	SPAC24C9.12c	SPBC4C3.05	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.972758639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761295	2540866	2541824	277383	278315	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC27E2.02	sep1	SPAC27E2.02	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.069852802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761296	2540866	2539667	277383	276222	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC13G1.08c	sep1	ash2	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.051683502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761297	2540866	2542710	277383	279163	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC750.08c	sep1	SPAC750.08c	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.47763167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761298	2540866	2542419	277383	278882	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC17G6.05c	sep1	bro1	SPBC4C3.05	SPAC17G6.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513842842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761299	2540866	2539217	277383	275787	SPBC4C3.12	SPCC1223.03c	sep1	gut2	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44817972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761300	2540866	2543234	277383	279662	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC977.11	sep1	SPAC977.11	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.335697338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761301	2540866	2539953	277383	276497	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC1709.11c	sep1	png2	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.057515849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761302	2540866	2542919	277383	279360	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC6C3.08	sep1	nas6	SPBC4C3.05	SPAC6C3.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.639492607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761303	2540866	2541389	277383	277900	SPBC4C3.12	SPBPB2B2.09c	sep1	SPBPB2B2.09c	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.144902229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761304	2540866	2541536	277383	278036	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC1071.02	sep1	mms19	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.472198471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761305	2540866	2541708	277383	278203	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC31A2.02	sep1	trm112	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.399379671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761306	2540866	2540967	277383	277483	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC36B7.08c	sep1	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.785480791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761307	2540866	2540016	277383	276560	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC1773.09c	sep1	mug184	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577892241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761308	2540866	3361105	277383	280181	SPBC4C3.12	SPCC188.10c	sep1	SPCC188.10c	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517762077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761309	2540866	2539812	277383	276362	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC1347.02	sep1	fkbp39	SPBC4C3.05	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.348849763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761310	2540866	2541337	277383	277848	SPBC4C3.12	SPBP35G2.13c	sep1	swc2	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.187557794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761311	2540866	2539527	277383	276089	SPBC4C3.12	SPCC338.16	sep1	pof3	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.329643162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761312	2540866	2539519	277383	276081	SPBC4C3.12	SPCC364.05	sep1	vps3	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.398730862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761313	2540866	3361526	277383	280602	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC664.15	sep1	caf4	SPBC4C3.05	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319603159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761314	2540866	3361520	277383	280596	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC1610.02c	sep1	SPAC1610.02c	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.624462707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761315	2540866	2541017	277383	277532	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC36.07	sep1	elp1	SPBC4C3.05	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.331687943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761316	2540866	2540643	277383	277168	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC19G7.06	sep1	mbx1	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.362316166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761317	2540866	2538907	277383	275484	SPBC4C3.12	SPCC24B10.19c	sep1	nts1	SPBC4C3.05	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.460728399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761318	2540866	2543628	277383	280042	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC3H8.10	sep1	spo20	SPBC4C3.05	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.003774354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761319	2540866	2543670	277383	280084	SPBC4C3.12	SPAPB1E7.06c	sep1	eme1	SPBC4C3.05	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.938281808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761320	2540866	2540498	277383	277026	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC27.02c	sep1	ask1	SPBC4C3.05	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.709977329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761321	2540866	2539030	277383	275603	SPBC4C3.12	SPCP1E11.02	sep1	ppk38	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77802335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761322	2540866	2543304	277383	279728	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC6B12.12	sep1	tom70	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379327573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761323	2540866	2542075	277383	278552	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC27D7.06	sep1	etf1	SPBC4C3.05	SPAC27D7.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05101916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761324	2540866	2541432	277383	277937	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC1F5.05c	sep1	mso1	SPBC4C3.05	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.433517171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761325	2540866	2543368	277383	279790	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC630.06c	sep1	SPAC630.06c	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.003093236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761326	2540866	2540829	277383	277347	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC800.09	sep1	sum2	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.313397526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761327	2540866	2542418	277383	278881	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC1805.07c	sep1	dad2	SPBC4C3.05	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.193639886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761328	2540866	2543128	277383	279560	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC3F10.06c	sep1	rit1	SPBC4C3.05	SPAC3F10.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451500611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761329	2540866	2542826	277383	279273	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC13G6.09	sep1	SPAC13G6.09	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.544649511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761330	2540866	2539668	277383	276223	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC11B10.10c	sep1	pht1	SPBC4C3.05	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.871732087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761331	2540866	2541122	277383	277637	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC646.06c	sep1	agn2	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.988854516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761332	2540866	2539205	277383	275775	SPBC4C3.12	SPCC4B3.15	sep1	mid1	SPBC4C3.05	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.982184616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761333	2540866	2539920	277383	276464	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC119.08	sep1	pmk1	SPBC4C3.05	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505353511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761334	2540866	2543380	277383	279802	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC4G9.16c	sep1	rpl901	SPBC4C3.05	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.312817512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761335	2540866	2538840	277383	275421	SPBC4C3.12	SPCC736.07c	sep1	SPCC736.07c	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.774882271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761336	2540866	2540504	277383	277032	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC24C6.10c	sep1	dip1	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.11411548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761337	2540866	2543379	277383	279801	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC821.09	sep1	eng1	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.687603099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761338	2540866	2539700	277383	276253	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC1685.15c	sep1	klp6	SPBC4C3.05	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.249627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761339	2540866	2541806	277383	278297	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC4G8.13c	sep1	prz1	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.182232138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761340	2540866	2541627	277383	278123	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC1F5.08c	sep1	yam8	SPBC4C3.05	ehs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.515994085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761341	2540866	2543684	277383	280098	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC4G8.03c	sep1	SPAC4G8.03c	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.69435449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761342	2540866	2543087	277383	279520	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC30C2.04	sep1	SPAC30C2.04	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.495822279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761343	2540866	2542175	277383	278650	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC1F3.02c	sep1	mkh1	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.968069688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761344	2540866	2542424	277383	278886	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC1805.14	sep1	SPAC1805.14	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.638023628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761345	2540866	2540309	277383	276839	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC21B10.13c	sep1	yox1	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.270953136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761346	2540866	2541272	277383	277786	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC947.03c	sep1	naa38	SPBC4C3.05	mak31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317078705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761347	2540866	2542943	277383	279384	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC1348.03	sep1	SPBC1348.03	SPBC4C3.05	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.375224487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761348	2540866	2543472	277383	279892	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC959.04c	sep1	omh6	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.609808939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761349	2540866	2540734	277383	277257	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC19G7.09	sep1	ulp1	SPBC4C3.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.207477754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761350	2541809	2542598	278300	279052	SPAC22A12.11	SPAC6G10.08	dak1	idp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.001339536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761351	2541809	2542518	278300	278976	SPAC22A12.11	SPAC1B3.16c	dak1	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.874189214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761352	2541809	2538806	278300	275387	SPAC22A12.11	SPCC1840.09	dak1	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874630338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761353	2541809	2540964	278300	277480	SPAC22A12.11	SPBC365.16	dak1	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.308216891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761354	2541809	2542177	278300	278652	SPAC22A12.11	SPAC17H9.08	dak1	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.54086286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761355	2541809	2541186	278300	277700	SPAC22A12.11	SPBC725.01	dak1	SPBC725.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.07710362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761356	2541809	2540229	278300	276761	SPAC22A12.11	SPBC31F10.15c	dak1	atp15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046637476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761357	2541809	2541797	278300	278288	SPAC22A12.11	SPAC22F3.04	dak1	mug62	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378359675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761358	2542097	2541902	278573	278392	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC27E2.07	rpb7	pvg2	SPAPYUK71.02	mug53	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933079093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761359	2542097	2538721	278573	275305	SPACUNK4.06c	SPCC1494.10	rpb7	adn3	SPAPYUK71.02	SPCC70.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769904398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761360	2542097	2538961	278573	275535	SPACUNK4.06c	SPCC285.14	rpb7	trs130	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.918293318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761361	2542097	2542577	278573	279033	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC19G12.15c	rpb7	tpp1	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.249538032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761362	2542097	2540105	278573	276642	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC106.04	rpb7	ada1	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503762215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761363	2542097	2541512	278573	278013	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC11E3.08c	rpb7	nse6	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864526436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761364	2542097	2541426	278573	277931	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC227.06	rpb7	SPAC227.06	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.192577713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761365	2542097	2540863	278573	277380	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC56F2.03	rpb7	SPBC56F2.03	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865390023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761366	2542097	3361561	278573	280637	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC11E3.01c	rpb7	swr1	SPAPYUK71.02	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.050725194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761367	2542097	2541585	278573	278082	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC14C4.05c	rpb7	man1	SPAPYUK71.02	heh2|mug61	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81232316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761368	2542097	2540168	278573	276703	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC1683.06c	rpb7	SPBC1683.06c	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712262411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761369	2542097	2539201	278573	275772	SPACUNK4.06c	SPCC188.09c	rpb7	pfl4	SPAPYUK71.02	SPCC188.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446572107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761370	2542097	2540491	278573	277019	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC28E12.04	rpb7	SPBC28E12.04	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.017557369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761371	2542097	2540975	278573	277491	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC354.12	rpb7	gpd3	SPAPYUK71.02	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.962129444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761372	2542097	2539420	278573	275985	SPACUNK4.06c	SPCC970.07c	rpb7	raf2	SPAPYUK71.02	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864240826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761373	2542097	2542107	278573	278583	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC30.01c	rpb7	sec72	SPAPYUK71.02	sec7b|sec702	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.826237774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761374	2542097	2542714	278573	279167	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC5H10.06c	rpb7	adh4	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324595401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761375	2542097	2539235	278573	275805	SPACUNK4.06c	SPCC1682.15	rpb7	mug122	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.745817253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761376	2542097	2542669	278573	279122	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC29B12.08	rpb7	clr5	SPAPYUK71.02	SPAC29B12.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.567063757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761377	2542097	2542696	278573	279149	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC29B12.03	rpb7	spd1	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.319098581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761378	2542097	2541560	278573	278059	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC24B11.12c	rpb7	SPAC24B11.12c	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988175137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761379	2542097	2539823	278573	276373	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC16A3.18	rpb7	cip1	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771667492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761380	2542097	2540851	278573	277368	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC4F6.04	rpb7	rpl2502	SPAPYUK71.02	rpl23a-2|rpl25b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154165615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761381	2542097	2543563	278573	279979	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC664.02c	rpb7	arp8	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092369339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761382	2542097	2540825	278573	277343	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC428.08c	rpb7	clr4	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037273624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761383	2542097	2541926	278573	278414	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC222.14c	rpb7	SPAC222.14c	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573614207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761384	2542097	2542568	278573	279024	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC1952.02	rpb7	tma23	SPAPYUK71.02	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864898847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761385	2542097	2542268	278573	278737	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC17A5.07c	rpb7	ulp2	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.264364603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761386	2542097	2543514	278573	279932	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC4D7.03	rpb7	pop2	SPAPYUK71.02	sud1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044872693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761387	2542097	2543020	278573	279456	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC10F6.13c	rpb7	SPAC10F6.13c	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331051058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761388	2542097	2541250	278573	277764	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC8D2.17	rpb7	gmh4	SPAPYUK71.02	SPBC8D2.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.15272783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761389	2542097	2542707	278573	279160	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC25G10.03	rpb7	zip1	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.946823748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761390	2542097	2543445	278573	279865	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC4F10.13c	rpb7	mpd2	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.198826882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761391	2542097	2540886	278573	277403	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC4F6.10	rpb7	vps901	SPAPYUK71.02	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.33156307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761392	2542097	2542168	278573	278643	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC17A5.16	rpb7	ftp105	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517396382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761393	2542097	2539903	278573	276449	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC15C4.04c	rpb7	SPBC15C4.04c	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.195418007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761394	2542097	2541183	278573	277697	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC725.14	rpb7	arg6	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.551638896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761395	2542097	2542452	278573	278913	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC1D4.02c	rpb7	SPAC1D4.02c	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851103307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761396	2542097	2538994	278573	275568	SPACUNK4.06c	SPCC553.01c	rpb7	dbl2	SPAPYUK71.02	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86488514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761397	2542097	2542357	278573	278822	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC1782.07	rpb7	qcr8	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321358196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761398	2542097	2541710	278573	278205	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC343.11c	rpb7	msc1	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.051810888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761399	2542097	2543396	278573	279818	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC4D7.11	rpb7	dsc4	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328332714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761400	2542097	2541187	278573	277701	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC776.14	rpb7	plh1	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.988321618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761401	2542097	2539667	278573	276222	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC13G1.08c	rpb7	ash2	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.997702791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761402	2542097	2539000	278573	275574	SPACUNK4.06c	SPCC1450.06c	rpb7	grx3	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.118501362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761403	2542097	2542946	278573	279386	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC6F12.03c	rpb7	fsv1	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.686330791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761404	2542097	2541595	278573	278092	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC1565.01	rpb7	SPAC1565.01	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.906889248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761405	2542097	2540836	278573	277354	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC18H10.19	rpb7	vps38	SPAPYUK71.02	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.554046635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761406	2542097	2543378	278573	279800	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC3H8.07c	rpb7	pac10	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932953109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761407	2542097	2539958	278573	276502	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC1718.07c	rpb7	zfs1	SPAPYUK71.02	moc4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.132850954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761408	2542097	2542519	278573	278977	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC19G12.08	rpb7	scs7	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.616715029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761409	2542097	2539027	278573	275600	SPACUNK4.06c	SPCC1322.08	rpb7	srk1	SPAPYUK71.02	mkp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.923571016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761410	2542097	2539953	278573	276497	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC1709.11c	rpb7	png2	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.555483141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761411	2542097	2542439	278573	278901	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC17A5.08	rpb7	erp2	SPAPYUK71.02	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385354824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761412	2542097	2540990	278573	277506	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC36B7.06c	rpb7	mug20	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199970165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761413	2542097	2540378	278573	276907	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC30D10.18c	rpb7	rpl102	SPAPYUK71.02	rpl1-2|rpl10a-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046496303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761414	2542097	2541389	278573	277900	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBPB2B2.09c	rpb7	SPBPB2B2.09c	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.746921592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761415	2542097	2539348	278573	275914	SPACUNK4.06c	SPCC18B5.07c	rpb7	nup61	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.192334533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761416	2542097	2538708	278573	275292	SPACUNK4.06c	SPCC594.01	rpb7	SPCC594.01	SPAPYUK71.02	SPCC736.16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819005767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761417	2542097	2542951	278573	279391	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC1071.05	rpb7	SPAC1071.05	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.103309209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761418	2542097	2540342	278573	276871	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC2G2.01c	rpb7	liz1	SPAPYUK71.02	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642951445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761419	2542097	2543350	278573	279772	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC56E4.03	rpb7	SPAC56E4.03	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449414139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761420	2542097	2539421	278573	275986	SPACUNK4.06c	SPCC794.11c	rpb7	ent3	SPAPYUK71.02	SPCC794.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991211224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761421	2542097	2543254	278573	279682	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC1006.03c	rpb7	red1	SPAPYUK71.02	iss3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.838022431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761422	2542097	2540930	278573	277446	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC354.10	rpb7	def1	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.889283216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761423	2542097	2538848	278573	275429	SPACUNK4.06c	SPCC613.12c	rpb7	raf1	SPAPYUK71.02	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044322192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761424	2542097	2540946	278573	277462	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC36.04	rpb7	cys11	SPAPYUK71.02	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.132979298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761425	2542097	2541144	278573	277659	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC685.06	rpb7	rps001	SPAPYUK71.02	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.329412885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761426	2542097	2542725	278573	279176	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC3A12.10	rpb7	rpl2001	SPAPYUK71.02	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.935328557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761427	2542097	2539538	278573	276100	SPACUNK4.06c	SPCC364.06	rpb7	nap1	SPAPYUK71.02	nap11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807519475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761428	2542097	2539763	278573	276314	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC1861.05	rpb7	SPBC1861.05	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389007942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761429	2542097	2542806	278573	279254	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC1610.01	rpb7	saf5	SPAPYUK71.02	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.511580083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761430	2542097	2539354	278573	275920	SPACUNK4.06c	SPCC4F11.03c	rpb7	SPCC4F11.03c	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.052240984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761431	2542097	2542327	278573	278793	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC16C9.06c	rpb7	upf1	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046978014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761432	2542097	2541175	278573	277689	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC839.13c	rpb7	rpl1601	SPAPYUK71.02	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.264666113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761433	2542097	2542940	278573	279381	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC31A2.12	rpb7	SPAC31A2.12	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.131816963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761434	2542097	2538962	278573	275536	SPACUNK4.06c	SPCC965.13	rpb7	SPCC965.13	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.510386439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761435	2542097	2543130	278573	279562	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC869.05c	rpb7	SPAC869.05c	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328591803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761436	2542097	2541432	278573	277937	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC1F5.05c	rpb7	mso1	SPAPYUK71.02	SPAC1F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980751158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761437	2542097	2541425	278573	277930	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC2C4.17c	rpb7	msy2	SPAPYUK71.02	SPAC2C4.17c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807951651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761438	2542097	2540115	278573	276652	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC1778.02	rpb7	rap1	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440570832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761439	2542097	2539346	278573	275912	SPACUNK4.06c	SPCC569.04	rpb7	SPCC569.04	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.264837294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761440	2542097	2540346	278573	276875	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC2F12.03c	rpb7	ebs1	SPAPYUK71.02	SPBC2F12.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.506685231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761441	2542097	2540699	278573	277223	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC800.08	rpb7	gcd10	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.715851018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761442	2542097	2541229	278573	277743	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC839.05c	rpb7	rps1701	SPAPYUK71.02	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810084501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761443	2542097	2543437	278573	279857	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAPB1A10.14	rpb7	pof15	SPAPYUK71.02	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504745698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761444	2542097	2539668	278573	276223	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC11B10.10c	rpb7	pht1	SPAPYUK71.02	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.710073562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761445	2542097	2539928	278573	276472	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC1604.08c	rpb7	imp1	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.630705107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761446	2542097	2539702	278573	276255	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC1604.12	rpb7	SPBC1604.12	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811247314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761447	2542097	2540146	278573	276683	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC17A3.06	rpb7	SPBC17A3.06	SPAPYUK71.02	pi040	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149727503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761448	2542097	2539178	278573	275749	SPACUNK4.06c	SPCC1682.14	rpb7	rpl1902	SPAPYUK71.02	rpl19-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.146968101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761449	2542097	2542244	278573	278714	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC19G12.13c	rpb7	poz1	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778049079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761450	2542097	2539169	278573	275740	SPACUNK4.06c	SPCC1235.11	rpb7	mpc1	SPAPYUK71.02	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647545728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761451	2542097	2543384	278573	279806	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC637.06	rpb7	gmh5	SPAPYUK71.02	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988090899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761452	2542097	2540314	278573	276844	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC2G5.03	rpb7	ctu1	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925819666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761453	2542097	2539588	278573	276146	SPACUNK4.06c	SPCC962.04	rpb7	rps1201	SPAPYUK71.02	rps12|rps12-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196926659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761454	2542097	2541478	278573	277980	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC2F7.17	rpb7	mrf1	SPAPYUK71.02	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.501325849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761455	2542097	2541491	278573	277993	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC2C4.16c	rpb7	rps801	SPAPYUK71.02	rps8|rps8-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154614017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761456	2542097	2541808	278573	278299	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC22A12.14c	rpb7	SPAC22A12.14c	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.261096686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761457	2542097	2542890	278573	279334	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC13G6.14	rpb7	aps1	SPAPYUK71.02	SPAC24B11.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.849527133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761458	2542097	2541272	278573	277786	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC947.03c	rpb7	naa38	SPAPYUK71.02	mak31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.617996835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761459	2542097	2542617	278573	279071	SPACUNK4.06c	SPAC13A11.01c	rpb7	rga8	SPAPYUK71.02	SPAC2F7.18c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262977713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761460	2542097	2541062	278573	277577	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC660.11	rpb7	tcg1	SPAPYUK71.02	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571678517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761461	2542097	2538730	278573	275314	SPACUNK4.06c	SPCC31H12.02c	rpb7	mug73	SPAPYUK71.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442685599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761462	2541259	2542598	277773	279052	SPBC8D2.16c	SPAC6G10.08	SPBC8D2.16c	idp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387674691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761463	2541259	2542555	277773	279012	SPBC8D2.16c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC8D2.16c	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.222923299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761464	2541259	2541761	277773	278255	SPBC8D2.16c	SPAC7D4.12c	SPBC8D2.16c	SPAC7D4.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864718357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761465	2541259	2542695	277773	279148	SPBC8D2.16c	SPAC12B10.09	SPBC8D2.16c	pet801	-	SPAC12B10.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.177945624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761466	2541259	2543483	277773	279903	SPBC8D2.16c	SPAPB2B4.02	SPBC8D2.16c	grx5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.761689594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761467	2541259	2540886	277773	277403	SPBC8D2.16c	SPBC4F6.10	SPBC8D2.16c	vps901	-	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.686756883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761468	2541259	2539293	277773	275861	SPBC8D2.16c	SPCC553.08c	SPBC8D2.16c	ria1	-	SPCC553.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.689691011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761469	2541259	2542886	277773	279331	SPBC8D2.16c	SPAC1486.01	SPBC8D2.16c	SPAC1486.01	-	sod2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391079238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761470	3361420	2538961	280496	275535	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPCC285.14	csn2	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.626989832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761471	3361420	2539949	280496	276493	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPBC1703.04	csn2	mlh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.456534247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761472	3361420	2542518	280496	278976	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPAC1B3.16c	csn2	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.310781401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761473	3361420	2541512	280496	278013	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPAC11E3.08c	csn2	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.566314638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761474	3361420	2540161	280496	276696	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPBC13E7.03c	csn2	SPBC13E7.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.144898819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761475	3361420	2539226	280496	275796	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPCC16C4.20c	csn2	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711289126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761476	3361420	2542468	280496	278929	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPAC1D4.09c	csn2	rtf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852960036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761477	3361420	2540945	280496	277461	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPBC342.06c	csn2	rtt109	-	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.458254203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761478	3361420	2543453	280496	279873	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPAC3G9.03	csn2	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325123841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761479	3361420	2542318	280496	278784	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPAC16C9.05	csn2	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.184235947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761480	3361420	2540595	280496	277121	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPBC21C3.02c	csn2	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.062304268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761481	3361420	2538698	280496	275283	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPCC1442.02	csn2	SPCC1442.02	-	SPCC1450.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.498610979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761482	3361420	2538906	280496	275483	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPCC1259.03	csn2	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.700280935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761483	3361420	2542558	280496	279014	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPAC1952.07	csn2	rad1	-	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.107657771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761484	3361420	2539023	280496	275596	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPCC594.05c	csn2	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.683152634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761485	3361420	2543514	280496	279932	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPAC4D7.03	csn2	pop2	-	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.213090416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761486	3361420	2540892	280496	277408	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPBC530.01	csn2	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.846994816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761487	3361420	2541800	280496	278291	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPAC732.02c	csn2	SPAC732.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.525014372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761488	3361420	2540338	280496	276867	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPBC2G2.13c	csn2	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.676589761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761489	3361420	2540922	280496	277438	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPBC36.10	csn2	SPBC36.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.693037274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761490	3361420	2538706	280496	275290	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPCC338.08	csn2	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.901085838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761491	3361420	2543412	280496	279834	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPAC637.07	csn2	moe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.929516086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761492	3361420	2540673	280496	277198	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPBC1D7.03	csn2	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.689757116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761493	3361420	2540997	280496	277513	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPBC3H7.06c	csn2	pof9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.251949578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761494	3361420	2542519	280496	278977	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPAC19G12.08	csn2	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.874235146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761495	3361420	2539481	280496	276044	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPCC622.16c	csn2	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.000030192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761496	3361420	2541389	280496	277900	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPBPB2B2.09c	csn2	SPBPB2B2.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.371111945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761497	3361420	2539527	280496	276089	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPCC338.16	csn2	pof3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.217107795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761498	3361420	2540691	280496	277216	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPBC20F10.05	csn2	nrl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.010998661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761499	3361420	2541963	280496	278449	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPAC21E11.04	csn2	aca1	-	ppr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.790550305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761500	3361420	2539763	280496	276314	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPBC1861.05	csn2	SPBC1861.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.586927117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761501	3361420	2540910	280496	277426	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPBC577.02	csn2	rpl3801	-	rpl38-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.438323807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761502	3361420	2539160	280496	275732	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPCC18.17c	csn2	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568634328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761503	3361420	2543628	280496	280042	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPAC3H8.10	csn2	spo20	-	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391285924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761504	3361420	2542327	280496	278793	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPAC16C9.06c	csn2	upf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.540394848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761505	3361420	5802917	280496	858055	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPAC17A2.14	csn2	SPAC17A2.14	-	SPAC17G6.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45769908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761506	3361420	2540992	280496	277508	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPBC342.05	csn2	crb2	-	rhp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.485703729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761507	3361420	2540927	280496	277443	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPBC365.06	csn2	pmt3	-	smt3|ubl2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.335506621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761508	3361420	2543380	280496	279802	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPAC4G9.16c	csn2	rpl901	-	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.525864471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761509	3361420	2539189	280496	275760	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPCC1682.16	csn2	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.310775039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761510	3361420	2541539	280496	278039	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPAP27G11.12	csn2	SPAP27G11.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.312186962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761511	3361420	3361410	280496	280486	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPAC1527.01	csn2	mok11	-	SPAC23D3.15	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.277069749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761512	3361420	2542424	280496	278886	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPAC1805.14	csn2	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.609290532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761513	3361420	2542111	280496	278587	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPAC1687.14c	csn2	SPAC1687.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.370295912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761514	3361420	2542943	280496	279384	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPBC1348.03	csn2	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.371075848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761515	3361420	2542094	280496	278571	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPAC29B12.06c	csn2	rcd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.337451411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761516	2538954	2540279	275528	276810	SPCC1753.04	SPBC3B8.04c	tol1	SPBC3B8.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.608008883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761517	2538954	2541104	275528	277619	SPCC1753.04	SPBC6B1.03c	tol1	SPBC6B1.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.516549458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761518	2538954	2543201	275528	279630	SPCC1753.04	SPAC3F10.15c	tol1	spo12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872250545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761519	2538954	2542917	275528	279358	SPCC1753.04	SPAC9E9.11	tol1	plr1	-	plr	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.500263436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761520	2538954	2541200	275528	277714	SPCC1753.04	SPBC8D2.03c	tol1	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.973869699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761521	2538954	2543043	275528	279478	SPCC1753.04	SPAC3F10.13	tol1	ucp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.190717953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761522	2538954	2541541	275528	278041	SPCC1753.04	SPAC1F7.11c	tol1	SPAC1F7.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.882955242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761523	2538954	2541311	275528	277823	SPCC1753.04	SPBP8B7.09c	tol1	los1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.566694454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761524	2538954	2538927	275528	275503	SPCC1753.04	SPCC1795.09	tol1	yps1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.842076038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761525	2538954	2542213	275528	278687	SPCC1753.04	SPAC3G6.13c	tol1	rpl4101	-	rpl41-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.860060535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761526	2538954	2539952	275528	276496	SPCC1753.04	SPBC1709.14	tol1	SPBC1709.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992965797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761527	2538954	2542464	275528	278925	SPCC1753.04	SPAC1A6.09c	tol1	lag1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.311357928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761528	2538954	2542357	275528	278822	SPCC1753.04	SPAC1782.07	tol1	qcr8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.998154516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761529	2538954	2539958	275528	276502	SPCC1753.04	SPBC1718.07c	tol1	zfs1	-	moc4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.119715547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761530	2538954	2540342	275528	276871	SPCC1753.04	SPBC2G2.01c	tol1	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.31919678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761531	2538954	2541156	275528	277671	SPCC1753.04	SPBC685.07c	tol1	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913822257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761532	2538954	2538762	275528	275345	SPCC1753.04	SPCC306.04c	tol1	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443713192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761533	2538954	2543096	275528	279528	SPCC1753.04	SPAC977.05c	tol1	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.271161958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761534	2538954	2543066	275528	279499	SPCC1753.04	SPAC343.12	tol1	rds1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815310716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761535	2538954	2540798	275528	277317	SPCC1753.04	SPBC19C7.01	tol1	mni1	-	SPBC32F12.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.450990098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761536	2539769	2541117	276320	277632	SPBC1685.08	SPBC646.13	cti6	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640814819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761537	2539769	2540347	276320	276876	SPBC1685.08	SPBC30B4.08	cti6	eri1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.940169397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761538	2539769	3361375	276320	280451	SPBC1685.08	SPAC212.06c	cti6	SPAC212.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.918420234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761539	2539769	2542277	276320	278746	SPBC1685.08	SPAC17A5.02c	cti6	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.746034793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761540	2539769	2543308	276320	279732	SPBC1685.08	SPAC694.04c	cti6	SPAC694.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.875278261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761541	2539769	2543108	276320	279540	SPBC1685.08	SPAC3A12.13c	cti6	SPAC3A12.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046327656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761542	2539769	2543563	276320	279979	SPBC1685.08	SPAC664.02c	cti6	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.470001479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761543	2539769	2539467	276320	276030	SPBC1685.08	SPCC417.07c	cti6	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504695917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761544	2539769	2543643	276320	280057	SPBC1685.08	SPAC3G9.07c	cti6	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.992709559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761545	2539769	2541899	276320	278389	SPBC1685.08	SPAC22E12.11c	cti6	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.198564379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761546	2539769	2539667	276320	276222	SPBC1685.08	SPBC13G1.08c	cti6	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.345041041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761547	2539769	2542519	276320	278977	SPBC1685.08	SPAC19G12.08	cti6	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.021495854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761548	2539769	2543443	276320	279863	SPBC1685.08	SPAC3H1.12c	cti6	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.872452702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761549	2539769	2541536	276320	278036	SPBC1685.08	SPAC1071.02	cti6	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579695613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761550	2539769	2542597	276320	279051	SPBC1685.08	SPAP8A3.07c	cti6	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.648260463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761551	2539769	2540882	276320	277399	SPBC1685.08	SPBC4F6.08c	cti6	mrpl39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.680733641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761552	2539769	2541488	276320	277990	SPBC1685.08	SPAC227.17c	cti6	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.328531742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761553	2539769	2541628	276320	278124	SPBC1685.08	SPAC110.02	cti6	pds5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813405722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761554	2539769	2540001	276320	276545	SPBC1685.08	SPBC1289.13c	cti6	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567947681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761555	2539769	2540442	276320	276970	SPBC1685.08	SPBC25B2.04c	cti6	mtg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.686678053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761556	2539769	2539239	276320	275809	SPBC1685.08	SPCC1020.10	cti6	oca2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319793206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761557	2539769	2541531	276320	278031	SPBC1685.08	SPAC25A8.01c	cti6	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.346969276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761558	2539769	2542826	276320	279273	SPBC1685.08	SPAC13G6.09	cti6	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.975910021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761559	2539769	2539668	276320	276223	SPBC1685.08	SPBC11B10.10c	cti6	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440407313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761560	2539769	3361165	276320	280241	SPBC1685.08	SPBC1348.12	cti6	SPBC1348.12	-	SPAC1348.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6353231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761561	2539769	2542566	276320	279022	SPBC1685.08	SPAC8C9.12c	cti6	SPAC8C9.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814412791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761562	2539769	2541478	276320	277980	SPBC1685.08	SPAC2F7.17	cti6	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445997194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761563	2539740	2543432	276292	279852	SPBC1685.04	SPAC4G8.05	SPBC1685.04	ppk14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.253142269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761564	2539740	2541776	276292	278270	SPBC1685.04	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC1685.04	swd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985295988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761565	2539740	2542597	276292	279051	SPBC1685.04	SPAP8A3.07c	SPBC1685.04	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.205452768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761566	2539740	2538762	276292	275345	SPBC1685.04	SPCC306.04c	SPBC1685.04	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.850855532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761567	2539740	2539925	276292	276469	SPBC1685.04	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC1685.04	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.118724768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761568	2539740	2542355	276292	278820	SPBC1685.04	SPAC29A4.13	SPBC1685.04	SPAC29A4.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380863055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761569	2539740	2542418	276292	278881	SPBC1685.04	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC1685.04	dad2	-	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.898280832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761570	2539740	2539207	276292	275777	SPBC1685.04	SPCC285.09c	SPBC1685.04	cgs2	-	pde1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.764162376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761571	2539740	2542059	276292	278537	SPBC1685.04	SPAC328.06	SPBC1685.04	ubp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.352246963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761572	2539740	2539001	276292	275575	SPBC1685.04	SPCC1494.08c	SPBC1685.04	SPCC1494.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505908849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761573	2541395	2542143	277904	278619	SPBP8B7.25	SPAC17C9.07	cyp4	alg8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.189254251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761574	2541395	2539165	277904	275736	SPBP8B7.25	SPCC1281.04	cyp4	SPCC1281.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980820108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761575	2541395	2542701	277904	279154	SPBP8B7.25	SPAC26H5.05	cyp4	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988082876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761576	2541395	2540560	277904	277087	SPBP8B7.25	SPBC2D10.14c	cyp4	myo51	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.672253812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761577	2541395	2543111	277904	279543	SPBP8B7.25	SPAC806.07	cyp4	ndk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.895533273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761578	2541395	2540993	277904	277509	SPBP8B7.25	SPBC342.01c	cyp4	alg6	-	SPBC3F6.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.503646515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761579	2541395	2541496	277904	277998	SPBP8B7.25	SPAC23D3.09	cyp4	arp42	-	arp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154665907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761580	2541395	2541710	277904	278205	SPBP8B7.25	SPAC343.11c	cyp4	msc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.005811093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761581	2541395	2538708	277904	275292	SPBP8B7.25	SPCC594.01	cyp4	SPCC594.01	-	SPCC736.16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09956157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761582	2541395	2539519	277904	276081	SPBP8B7.25	SPCC364.05	cyp4	vps3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864425332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761583	2541395	2541713	277904	278208	SPBP8B7.25	SPAC3A12.12	cyp4	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.884025924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761584	2541395	2543567	277904	279983	SPBP8B7.25	SPAC890.03	cyp4	ppk16	-	mug92	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.160388646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761585	2541395	2543304	277904	279728	SPBP8B7.25	SPAC6B12.12	cyp4	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.353113098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761586	2541395	2541531	277904	278031	SPBP8B7.25	SPAC25A8.01c	cyp4	fft3	-	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.078552979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761587	2541395	2543372	277904	279794	SPBP8B7.25	SPAPB1A10.09	cyp4	ase1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.890270925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761588	2542466	2542723	278927	279174	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC25H1.03	nup40	atg101	-	mug66	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453362951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761589	2542466	2542518	278927	278976	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC1B3.16c	nup40	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.065543078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761590	2542466	2541512	278927	278013	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC11E3.08c	nup40	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8750767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761591	2542466	2540026	278927	276570	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC16D10.08c	nup40	hsp104	-	SPBC16D10.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.669636938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761592	2542466	2539684	278927	276239	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC16A3.16	nup40	SPBC16A3.16	-	cwc27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.62930305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761593	2542466	2539965	278927	276509	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC1685.14c	nup40	SPBC1685.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.745577461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761594	2542466	2541032	278927	277547	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC3H7.11	nup40	SPBC3H7.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319673242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761595	2542466	2539582	278927	276141	SPAC19E9.01c	SPCC594.07c	nup40	bqt3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379473977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761596	2542466	2542378	278927	278842	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC1805.04	nup40	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.472140062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761597	2542466	2538985	278927	275559	SPAC19E9.01c	SPCC13B11.03c	nup40	SPCC13B11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709340922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761598	2542466	2539876	278927	276422	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC1734.07c	nup40	trs8502	-	SPBC1734.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.331163499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761599	2542466	3361561	278927	280637	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC11E3.01c	nup40	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924879516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761600	2542466	2541585	278927	278082	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC14C4.05c	nup40	man1	-	heh2|mug61	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.337927732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761601	2542466	2541051	278927	277566	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC3E7.08c	nup40	rad13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868196784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761602	2542466	2541345	278927	277856	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBP35G2.07	nup40	ilv1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.508489707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761603	2542466	2540694	278927	277218	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC19C7.10	nup40	bqt4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.743547006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761604	2542466	2540979	278927	277495	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC3H7.10	nup40	elp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.278729326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761605	2542466	2541500	278927	278002	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC227.18	nup40	lys3	-	SPAC2F7.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196275868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761606	2542466	2543288	278927	279713	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC6C3.03c	nup40	SPAC6C3.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819835467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761607	2542466	2538801	278927	275382	SPAC19E9.01c	SPCC285.13c	nup40	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.254516379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761608	2542466	2540692	278927	277217	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC800.07c	nup40	tsf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.198131217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761609	2542466	2543547	278927	279964	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC926.02	nup40	SPAC926.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578587347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761610	2542466	2540727	278927	277250	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC1921.03c	nup40	mex67	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.264911177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761611	2542466	2542180	278927	278655	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC589.07c	nup40	atg1801	-	atg18|atg18a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632443202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761612	2542466	2540595	278927	277121	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC21C3.02c	nup40	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.506462168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761613	2542466	2539175	278927	275746	SPAC19E9.01c	SPCC16C4.01	nup40	sif2	-	SPCC5E4.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.333147129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761614	2542466	2541105	278927	277620	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC685.02	nup40	exo5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.987199392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761615	2542466	2541021	278927	277536	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC3B8.10c	nup40	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.03638578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761616	2542466	2540893	278927	277409	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC543.10	nup40	get1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.768051117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761617	2542466	2539467	278927	276030	SPAC19E9.01c	SPCC417.07c	nup40	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381981662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761618	2542466	2539339	278927	275905	SPAC19E9.01c	SPCC1494.03	nup40	arz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.122527722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761619	2542466	2539003	278927	275577	SPAC19E9.01c	SPCC1442.17c	nup40	ist1	-	SPCC285.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.127053796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761620	2542466	2538821	278927	275402	SPAC19E9.01c	SPCC584.01c	nup40	SPCC584.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444780568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761621	2542466	2541776	278927	278270	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC23H3.05c	nup40	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.051925108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761622	2542466	2541093	278927	277608	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC646.08c	nup40	SPBC646.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.840163085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761623	2542466	2540429	278927	276957	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC29A10.07	nup40	pom152	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.071603369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761624	2542466	2542507	278927	278965	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC18G6.13	nup40	SPAC18G6.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448072747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761625	2542466	2541889	278927	278379	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC2F7.03c	nup40	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451651272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761626	2542466	2543208	278927	279637	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC328.04	nup40	SPAC328.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.199060967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761627	2542466	2542873	278927	279318	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC9G1.02	nup40	wis4	-	wak1|wik1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447628553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761628	2542466	2541166	278927	277681	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC725.15	nup40	ura5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875291619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761629	2542466	2539603	278927	276161	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC1289.06c	nup40	ppr8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.975487594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761630	2542466	2539586	278927	276145	SPAC19E9.01c	SPCC70.08c	nup40	SPCC70.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330615307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761631	2542466	2540086	278927	276624	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC16H5.12c	nup40	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.945681624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761632	2542466	2539667	278927	276222	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC13G1.08c	nup40	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568389805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761633	2542466	2540628	278927	277154	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC25B2.08	nup40	SPBC25B2.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.560916123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761634	2542466	2540751	278927	277273	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC20F10.10	nup40	psl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.979390041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761635	2542466	2541326	278927	277838	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBP35G2.03c	nup40	sgo1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575218703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761636	2542466	2539232	278927	275802	SPAC19E9.01c	SPCC1223.04c	nup40	set11	-	mug76	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383940813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761637	2542466	2538935	278927	275511	SPAC19E9.01c	SPCC1682.11c	nup40	ctl1	-	SPCC1682.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.270545938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761638	2542466	2541009	278927	277524	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC428.04	nup40	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.04937277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761639	2542466	2540530	278927	277058	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC405.05	nup40	atg16	-	SPBC405.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.999654544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761640	2542466	2542010	278927	278493	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC20H4.05c	nup40	SPAC20H4.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441100151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761641	2542466	2539936	278927	276480	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC1685.05	nup40	SPBC1685.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.868263914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761642	2542466	2541281	278927	277794	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC902.04	nup40	rmn1	-	SPBC902.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32409236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761643	2542466	2541406	278927	277914	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBPB2B2.07c	nup40	SPBPB2B2.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.122983831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761644	2542466	2540687	278927	277212	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC21D10.08c	nup40	SPBC21D10.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818284109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761645	2542466	2540706	278927	277229	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC19C7.12c	nup40	omh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.502657816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761646	2542466	2538844	278927	275425	SPAC19E9.01c	SPCC1183.09c	nup40	pmp31	-	mug75	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874467751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761647	2542466	2539555	278927	276116	SPAC19E9.01c	SPCC4B3.08	nup40	lsg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.983254312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761648	2542466	2543071	278927	279504	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC3C7.06c	nup40	pit1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.100459992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761649	2542466	2543567	278927	279983	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC890.03	nup40	ppk16	-	mug92	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.123489038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761650	2542466	2539108	278927	275680	SPAC19E9.01c	SPCC1223.02	nup40	nmt1	-	thi3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930244708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761651	2542466	2539246	278927	275816	SPAC19E9.01c	SPCC18.13	nup40	SPCC18.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.911104979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761652	2542466	2539707	278927	276260	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC17F3.01c	nup40	rga5	-	SPBC557.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448407252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761653	2542466	2540421	278927	276949	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC2D10.19c	nup40	alb1	-	SPBC2D10.19c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643667458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761654	2542466	2540829	278927	277347	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC800.09	nup40	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.975301515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761655	2542466	2542418	278927	278881	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC1805.07c	nup40	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.200075464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761656	2542466	2542076	278927	278553	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC29A4.19c	nup40	cta5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.644259162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761657	2542466	2541036	278927	277551	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC3H7.05c	nup40	SPBC3H7.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913822257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761658	2542466	2539514	278927	276076	SPAC19E9.01c	SPCC663.14c	nup40	trp663	-	SPCC663.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.687731364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761659	2542466	2542826	278927	279273	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC13G6.09	nup40	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.132694018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761660	2542466	2540896	278927	277412	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC19C2.13c	nup40	ctu2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633733478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761661	2542466	2539375	278927	275941	SPAC19E9.01c	SPCC4G3.11	nup40	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.407650575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761662	2542466	2543380	278927	279802	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC4G9.16c	nup40	rpl901	-	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979604395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761663	2542466	3361410	278927	280486	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC1527.01	nup40	mok11	-	SPAC23D3.15	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.103269886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761664	2542466	2539700	278927	276253	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC1685.15c	nup40	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.648029569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761665	2542466	2540314	278927	276844	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC2G5.03	nup40	ctu1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384975643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761666	2542466	2540167	278927	276702	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC1683.04	nup40	SPBC1683.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.12149398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761667	2542466	2541272	278927	277786	SPAC19E9.01c	SPBC947.03c	nup40	naa38	-	mak31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45319634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761668	2542466	2542073	278927	278550	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC26F1.01	nup40	sec74	-	SPAPJ691.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199707616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761669	2542466	2542908	278927	279352	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC13G7.03	nup40	upf3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.251618303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761670	2540019	2542812	276563	279259	SPBC1685.01	SPAC6F6.01	pmp1	cch1	dsp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.298960878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761671	2540019	2541912	276563	278402	SPBC1685.01	SPAC222.16c	pmp1	csn3	dsp1	SPAC821.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991945543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761672	2540019	2542358	276563	278823	SPBC1685.01	SPAC1782.09c	pmp1	clp1	dsp1	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.552445415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761673	2540019	2542293	276563	278761	SPBC1685.01	SPAC17G8.14c	pmp1	pck1	dsp1	SPAC22H10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.763676514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761674	2540019	2540068	276563	276606	SPBC1685.01	SPBC1734.12c	pmp1	alg12	dsp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572052615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761675	2540019	2540686	276563	277211	SPBC1685.01	SPBC21D10.10	pmp1	bdc1	dsp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.094336035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761676	2540019	2542677	276563	279130	SPBC1685.01	SPAC26F1.10c	pmp1	pyp1	dsp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.157769835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761677	2540019	2542724	276563	279175	SPBC1685.01	SPAC767.01c	pmp1	vps1	dsp1	SPAC9G1.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988551006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761678	2540019	2543029	276563	279465	SPBC1685.01	SPAC11G7.01	pmp1	SPAC11G7.01	dsp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378086327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761679	2540019	2542981	276563	279419	SPBC1685.01	SPAC824.02	pmp1	bst1	dsp1	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.629163891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761680	2540019	2541021	276563	277536	SPBC1685.01	SPBC3B8.10c	pmp1	nem1	dsp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.320593118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761681	2540019	2539237	276563	275807	SPBC1685.01	SPCC24B10.13	pmp1	skb5	dsp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.074091845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761682	2540019	2543514	276563	279932	SPBC1685.01	SPAC4D7.03	pmp1	pop2	dsp1	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.115415192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761683	2540019	2541250	276563	277764	SPBC1685.01	SPBC8D2.17	pmp1	gmh4	dsp1	SPBC8D2.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453604436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761684	2540019	2541776	276563	278270	SPBC1685.01	SPAC23H3.05c	pmp1	swd1	dsp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.705230224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761685	2540019	2543144	276563	279576	SPBC1685.01	SPAC3F10.05c	pmp1	mug113	dsp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.123453098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761686	2540019	2542652	276563	279106	SPBC1685.01	SPAC1687.15	pmp1	gsk3	dsp1	skp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988689201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761687	2540019	2543412	276563	279834	SPBC1685.01	SPAC637.07	pmp1	moe1	dsp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.76778464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761688	2540019	2540150	276563	276687	SPBC1685.01	SPBC16E9.14c	pmp1	zrg17	dsp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.131668027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761689	2540019	2542522	276563	278980	SPBC1685.01	SPAC19A8.03	pmp1	ymr1	dsp1	SPAC19A8.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.898269091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761690	2540019	2540751	276563	277273	SPBC1685.01	SPBC20F10.10	pmp1	psl1	dsp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807016116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761691	2540019	2542549	276563	279006	SPBC1685.01	SPAC19A8.11c	pmp1	SPAC19A8.11c	dsp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.548695625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761692	2540019	2543080	276563	279513	SPBC1685.01	SPAC3A11.10c	pmp1	SPAC3A11.10c	dsp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808175969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761693	2540019	2542439	276563	278901	SPBC1685.01	SPAC17A5.08	pmp1	erp2	dsp1	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.689713674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761694	2540019	2540990	276563	277506	SPBC1685.01	SPBC36B7.06c	pmp1	mug20	dsp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702593376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761695	2540019	2542008	276563	278491	SPBC1685.01	SPAC2G11.07c	pmp1	ptc3	dsp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.048839895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761696	2540019	2541053	276563	277568	SPBC1685.01	SPBC56F2.10c	pmp1	alg5	dsp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.26242366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761697	2540019	2542597	276563	279051	SPBC1685.01	SPAP8A3.07c	pmp1	SPAP8A3.07c	dsp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.563474728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761698	2540019	2543517	276563	279935	SPBC1685.01	SPAC3G9.05	pmp1	spa2	dsp1	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.478433102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761699	2540019	2542869	276563	279314	SPBC1685.01	SPAC140.02	pmp1	gar2	dsp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869103669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761700	2540019	2541670	276563	278166	SPBC1685.01	SPAC24H6.13	pmp1	SPAC24H6.13	dsp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508202624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761701	2540019	2540706	276563	277229	SPBC1685.01	SPBC19C7.12c	pmp1	omh1	dsp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.506822576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761702	2540019	2539101	276563	275673	SPBC1685.01	SPCC736.04c	pmp1	gma12	dsp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.74119994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761703	2540019	2543619	276563	280033	SPBC1685.01	SPAC4F10.04	pmp1	ypa1	dsp1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.654500798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761704	2540019	2541909	276563	278399	SPBC1685.01	SPAC227.01c	pmp1	erd1	dsp1	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.409302891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761705	2540019	2540800	276563	277319	SPBC1685.01	SPBC409.20c	pmp1	psh3	dsp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.618112956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761706	2540019	2543304	276563	279728	SPBC1685.01	SPAC6B12.12	pmp1	tom70	dsp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.225303911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761707	2540019	2543160	276563	279591	SPBC1685.01	SPAC31A2.14	pmp1	bun107	dsp1	wdr48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.886621068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761708	2540019	2541100	276563	277615	SPBC1685.01	SPBC651.04	pmp1	SPBC651.04	dsp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.663687166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761709	2540019	2541367	276563	277878	SPBC1685.01	SPBP8B7.13	pmp1	vac7	dsp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.263451958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761710	2540019	2538756	276563	275339	SPBC1685.01	SPCC1795.10c	pmp1	SPCC1795.10c	dsp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.122368091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761711	2540019	2543329	276563	279752	SPBC1685.01	SPAC56F8.02	pmp1	SPAC56F8.02	dsp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.942408872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761712	2540019	2538916	276563	275493	SPBC1685.01	SPCC16C4.17	pmp1	mug123	dsp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.449178189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761713	2540019	2542403	276563	278867	SPBC1685.01	SPAC19A8.05c	pmp1	sst4	dsp1	vps27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.750203947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761714	2540019	2540551	276563	277078	SPBC1685.01	SPBC23E6.01c	pmp1	cxr1	dsp1	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.785955196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761715	2540019	2543384	276563	279806	SPBC1685.01	SPAC637.06	pmp1	gmh5	dsp1	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.132525044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761716	2540019	2541774	276563	278268	SPBC1685.01	SPAC22E12.05c	pmp1	rer1	dsp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979101855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761717	2540019	2541627	276563	278123	SPBC1685.01	SPAC1F5.08c	pmp1	yam8	dsp1	ehs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.466650892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761718	2540019	2538869	276563	275449	SPBC1685.01	SPCC777.02	pmp1	SPCC777.02	dsp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382314961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761719	2540019	2542617	276563	279071	SPBC1685.01	SPAC13A11.01c	pmp1	rga8	dsp1	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.278946365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761720	2541856	2539050	278347	275623	SPAC23H3.08c	SPCC11E10.08	bub3	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.745528347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761721	2541856	2542237	278347	278709	SPAC23H3.08c	SPAC19E9.02	bub3	fin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.954680493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761722	2541856	2541633	278347	278129	SPAC23H3.08c	SPAC664.01c	bub3	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.037999149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761723	2541856	2539420	278347	275985	SPAC23H3.08c	SPCC970.07c	bub3	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.451545278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761724	2541856	2542318	278347	278784	SPAC23H3.08c	SPAC16C9.05	bub3	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.560492106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761725	2541856	2542969	278347	279409	SPAC23H3.08c	SPAC4G8.10	bub3	gos1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.065383207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761726	2541856	2540825	278347	277343	SPAC23H3.08c	SPBC428.08c	bub3	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.061263292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761727	2541856	2542268	278347	278737	SPAC23H3.08c	SPAC17A5.07c	bub3	ulp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.487459452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761728	2541856	2540673	278347	277198	SPAC23H3.08c	SPBC1D7.03	bub3	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.161303896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761729	2541856	2540886	278347	277403	SPAC23H3.08c	SPBC4F6.10	bub3	vps901	-	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.876617299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761730	2541856	2540836	278347	277354	SPAC23H3.08c	SPBC18H10.19	bub3	vps38	-	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.138233311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761731	2541856	2539232	278347	275802	SPAC23H3.08c	SPCC1223.04c	bub3	set11	-	mug76	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507235744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761732	2541856	2540967	278347	277483	SPAC23H3.08c	SPBC36B7.08c	bub3	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.311909576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761733	2541856	2538848	278347	275429	SPAC23H3.08c	SPCC613.12c	bub3	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.587870809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761734	2541856	2541628	278347	278124	SPAC23H3.08c	SPAC110.02	bub3	pds5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.055502828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761735	2541856	2540498	278347	277026	SPAC23H3.08c	SPBC27.02c	bub3	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.613879967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761736	2541856	2541531	278347	278031	SPAC23H3.08c	SPAC25A8.01c	bub3	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8418014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761737	2541856	2540936	278347	277452	SPAC23H3.08c	SPBC800.05c	bub3	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.00229771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761738	2541856	2539700	278347	276253	SPAC23H3.08c	SPBC1685.15c	bub3	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.49522468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761739	2541856	2541806	278347	278297	SPAC23H3.08c	SPAC4G8.13c	bub3	prz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152321465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761740	2542482	2539301	278942	275869	SPAP8A3.06	SPCC622.03c	uaf2	SPCC622.03c	SPAP8A3.06|ods2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.30054808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761741	2542482	2542107	278942	278583	SPAP8A3.06	SPAC30.01c	uaf2	sec72	SPAP8A3.06|ods2	sec7b|sec702	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.606046152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761742	2542482	2538792	278942	275373	SPAP8A3.06	SPCP1E11.10	uaf2	SPCP1E11.10	SPAP8A3.06|ods2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.976565383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761743	2539094	2541512	275666	278013	SPCC330.02	SPAC11E3.08c	rhp7	nse6	SPCC613.14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.199827498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761744	2539094	2543651	275666	280065	SPCC330.02	SPAC644.11c	rhp7	pkp1	SPCC613.14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985862541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761745	2539094	3361520	275666	280596	SPCC330.02	SPAC1610.02c	rhp7	SPAC1610.02c	SPCC613.14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323782175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761746	2539094	2542635	275666	279089	SPCC330.02	SPAC24H6.09	rhp7	gef1	SPCC613.14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.366273312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761747	2539094	2540320	275666	276850	SPCC330.02	SPBC3D6.04c	rhp7	mad1	SPCC613.14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.054155394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761748	2541956	2540279	278443	276810	SPAC139.03	SPBC3B8.04c	toe2	SPBC3B8.04c	SPAC139.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.880595867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761749	2541956	2542273	278443	278742	SPAC139.03	SPAC17H9.13c	toe2	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC139.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.986651967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761750	2541956	2539129	278443	275701	SPAC139.03	SPCC338.14	toe2	ado1	SPAC139.03	SPCC338.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.188824328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761751	2541956	2542032	278443	278514	SPAC139.03	SPAC23C11.04c	toe2	pnk1	SPAC139.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453967226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761752	2541956	2539348	278443	275914	SPAC139.03	SPCC18B5.07c	toe2	nup61	SPAC139.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769718222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761753	2541956	2541372	278443	277883	SPAC139.03	SPBP8B7.28c	toe2	stc1	SPAC139.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645660018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761754	2542008	2539930	278491	276474	SPAC2G11.07c	SPBC1198.11c	ptc3	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.33066943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761755	2542008	2542701	278491	279154	SPAC2G11.07c	SPAC26H5.05	ptc3	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.55237447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761756	2542008	2542677	278491	279130	SPAC2G11.07c	SPAC26F1.10c	ptc3	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.001931411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761757	2542008	2541013	278491	277528	SPAC2G11.07c	SPBC3H7.13	ptc3	far10	-	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.310916952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761758	2542008	2541964	278491	278450	SPAC2G11.07c	SPAC2F3.08	ptc3	sut1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039064016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761759	2542008	2543651	278491	280065	SPAC2G11.07c	SPAC644.11c	ptc3	pkp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.449415358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761760	2542008	2542513	278491	278971	SPAC2G11.07c	SPAC1952.05	ptc3	gcn5	-	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.174912914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761761	2542008	2543144	278491	279576	SPAC2G11.07c	SPAC3F10.05c	ptc3	mug113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.176064741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761762	2542008	2542469	278491	278930	SPAC2G11.07c	SPAC19A8.04	ptc3	erg5	-	cyp61	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.896609713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761763	2542008	2541496	278491	277998	SPAC2G11.07c	SPAC23D3.09	ptc3	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635767335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761764	2542008	2540665	278491	277190	SPAC2G11.07c	SPBC83.02c	ptc3	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714319088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761765	2542008	2540019	278491	276563	SPAC2G11.07c	SPBC1685.01	ptc3	pmp1	-	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.048839895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761766	2542008	2540342	278491	276871	SPAC2G11.07c	SPBC2G2.01c	ptc3	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809877251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761767	2542008	2541746	278491	278240	SPAC2G11.07c	SPAC20G4.04c	ptc3	hus1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.231086354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761768	2542008	2539519	278491	276081	SPAC2G11.07c	SPCC364.05	ptc3	vps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709824347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761769	2542008	2538762	278491	275345	SPAC2G11.07c	SPCC306.04c	ptc3	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.172261352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761770	2542008	2541121	278491	277636	SPAC2G11.07c	SPBC609.03	ptc3	iqw1	-	iqwd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.747390324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761771	2542008	2539925	278491	276469	SPAC2G11.07c	SPBC16H5.13	ptc3	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986731185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761772	2542008	2541531	278491	278031	SPAC2G11.07c	SPAC25A8.01c	ptc3	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.753208272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761773	2542008	2541404	278491	277913	SPAC2G11.07c	SPBPB2B2.18	ptc3	SPBPB2B2.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513771359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761774	2542008	2540936	278491	277452	SPAC2G11.07c	SPBC800.05c	ptc3	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.804265233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761775	2542008	2539205	278491	275775	SPAC2G11.07c	SPCC4B3.15	ptc3	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637575402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761776	2542008	2540551	278491	277078	SPAC2G11.07c	SPBC23E6.01c	ptc3	cxr1	-	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.892011112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761777	2542008	2538792	278491	275373	SPAC2G11.07c	SPCP1E11.10	ptc3	SPCP1E11.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.56112206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761778	2542008	2542716	278491	279169	SPAC2G11.07c	SPAC25H1.07	ptc3	emc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.917303463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761779	2542008	2543372	278491	279794	SPAC2G11.07c	SPAPB1A10.09	ptc3	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.586388577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761780	2541179	2542577	277693	279033	SPBC6B1.08c	SPAC19G12.15c	ofd1	tpp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981169904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761781	2541179	2539988	277693	276532	SPBC6B1.08c	SPBC1271.05c	ofd1	SPBC1271.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871207261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761782	2541179	2543563	277693	279979	SPBC6B1.08c	SPAC664.02c	ofd1	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.997195153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761783	2541179	2543350	277693	279772	SPBC6B1.08c	SPAC56E4.03	ofd1	SPAC56E4.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.250370604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761784	2541179	2538762	277693	275345	SPBC6B1.08c	SPCC306.04c	ofd1	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.636205589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761785	2541179	2540519	277693	277047	SPBC6B1.08c	SPBC21C3.14c	ofd1	SPBC21C3.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440781127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761786	2541179	2540531	277693	277059	SPBC6B1.08c	SPBC23E6.08	ofd1	sat1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570081164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761787	2541179	2541478	277693	277980	SPBC6B1.08c	SPAC2F7.17	ofd1	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039401322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761788	2543381	2542598	279803	279052	SPAC630.09c	SPAC6G10.08	mug58	idp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811682205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761789	2543381	2538922	279803	275499	SPAC630.09c	SPCC16C4.10	mug58	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.411631864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761790	2543381	2542555	279803	279012	SPAC630.09c	SPAC1952.06c	mug58	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.09846095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761791	2543381	2542220	279803	278694	SPAC630.09c	SPAC1A6.03c	mug58	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.245128911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761792	2543381	2539960	279803	276504	SPAC630.09c	SPBC15D4.15	mug58	pho2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.672370993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761793	2543381	2540342	279803	276871	SPAC630.09c	SPBC2G2.01c	mug58	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.923872943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761794	2543381	2541762	279803	278256	SPAC630.09c	SPAC139.01c	mug58	SPAC139.01c	-	SPAC955.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.787038278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761795	2543381	2541789	279803	278281	SPAC630.09c	SPAC23H4.08	mug58	iwr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.024993798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761796	2540679	2541512	277204	278013	SPBC3D6.10	SPAC11E3.08c	apn2	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.79174031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761797	2540679	2540664	277204	277189	SPBC3D6.10	SPBC215.02	apn2	bob1	-	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926459173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761798	2540679	2539579	277204	276138	SPBC3D6.10	SPCP31B10.05	apn2	tdp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.259044956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761799	2540679	2538775	277204	275357	SPBC3D6.10	SPCC23B6.05c	apn2	ssb3	-	rpa3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514950728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761800	2540679	2541004	277204	277519	SPBC3D6.10	SPBC3F6.01c	apn2	SPBC3F6.01c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819579032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761801	2540679	2542032	277204	278514	SPBC3D6.10	SPAC23C11.04c	apn2	pnk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.298934743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761802	2540679	2539030	277204	275603	SPBC3D6.10	SPCP1E11.02	apn2	ppk38	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381029568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761803	2540679	2539998	277204	276542	SPBC3D6.10	SPBC16G5.03	apn2	SPBC16G5.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818755636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761804	2540679	2543633	277204	280047	SPBC3D6.10	SPAC3H8.05c	apn2	mms1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844256503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761805	2540679	2543516	277204	279934	SPBC3D6.10	SPAC4F10.11	apn2	spn1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.146345993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761806	2543079	2540150	279512	276687	SPAC343.04c	SPBC16E9.14c	SPAC343.04c	zrg17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.13280906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761807	2543079	2542431	279512	278893	SPAC343.04c	SPAC1A6.01c	SPAC343.04c	SPAC1A6.01c	-	SPAC23C4.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714646141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761808	2543079	2543378	279512	279800	SPAC343.04c	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAC343.04c	pac10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.984182426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761809	2543079	2541296	279512	277808	SPAC343.04c	SPBP8B7.06	SPAC343.04c	rpp201	-	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81871941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761810	2543079	2540910	279512	277426	SPAC343.04c	SPBC577.02	SPAC343.04c	rpl3801	-	rpl38-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640819497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761811	2543079	2541372	279512	277883	SPAC343.04c	SPBP8B7.28c	SPAC343.04c	stc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453483053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761812	2543079	2542716	279512	279169	SPAC343.04c	SPAC25H1.07	SPAC343.04c	emc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.772235136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761813	2543079	2542886	279512	279331	SPAC343.04c	SPAC1486.01	SPAC343.04c	SPAC1486.01	-	sod2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.254587851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761814	2543079	2539731	279512	276283	SPAC343.04c	SPBC1271.09	SPAC343.04c	SPBC1271.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980981735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761815	2539423	2542862	275988	279308	SPCC663.12	SPAC140.03	cid12	arb1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928125061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761816	2539423	2540060	275988	276598	SPCC663.12	SPBC106.01	cid12	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.326815447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761817	2539423	2541826	275988	278317	SPCC663.12	SPAC2G11.13	cid12	atg22	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876682128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761818	2539423	2542585	275988	279040	SPCC663.12	SPAC31A2.13c	cid12	sft1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.414411819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761819	2539423	2540913	275988	277429	SPCC663.12	SPBC56F2.08c	cid12	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.850230734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761820	2539423	2540901	275988	277417	SPCC663.12	SPBC4F6.16c	cid12	ero11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320545978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761821	2539423	2539582	275988	276141	SPCC663.12	SPCC594.07c	cid12	bqt3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.06436314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761822	2539423	2542237	275988	278709	SPCC663.12	SPAC19E9.02	cid12	fin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.127517617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761823	2539423	2543594	275988	280009	SPCC663.12	SPAC8F11.05c	cid12	mug130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318990059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761824	2539423	2542963	275988	279403	SPCC663.12	SPAC1071.03c	cid12	sil1	-	SPAC1071.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.206078019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761825	2539423	2543652	275988	280066	SPCC663.12	SPAC4H3.03c	cid12	SPAC4H3.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.26511032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761826	2539423	2542613	275988	279067	SPCC663.12	SPAC18B11.03c	cid12	SPAC18B11.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876441539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761827	2539423	2540999	275988	277515	SPCC663.12	SPBC4B4.04	cid12	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931412485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761828	2539423	2539420	275988	275985	SPCC663.12	SPCC970.07c	cid12	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.566221621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761829	2539423	2541200	275988	277714	SPCC663.12	SPBC8D2.03c	cid12	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987003457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761830	2539423	2539564	275988	276125	SPCC663.12	SPCC550.12	cid12	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036166535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761831	2539423	2539463	275988	276026	SPCC663.12	SPCC550.11	cid12	SPCC550.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703805783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761832	2539423	2542689	275988	279142	SPCC663.12	SPAC29B12.04	cid12	snz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092300348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761833	2539423	2540945	275988	277461	SPCC663.12	SPBC342.06c	cid12	rtt109	-	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.382338579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761834	2539423	2539331	275988	275897	SPCC663.12	SPCC24B10.09	cid12	rps1702	-	rps17|rps17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329079938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761835	2539423	2543542	275988	279959	SPCC663.12	SPAC823.09c	cid12	SPAC823.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927274583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761836	2539423	3361342	275988	280418	SPCC663.12	SPBC16D10.07c	cid12	sir2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.112108564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761837	2539423	2539365	275988	275931	SPCC663.12	SPCC24B10.16c	cid12	SPCC24B10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516862402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761838	2539423	2542023	275988	278506	SPCC663.12	SPAC20H4.10	cid12	ufd2	-	SPAC145.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326177547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761839	2539423	2539792	275988	276342	SPCC663.12	SPBC1271.14	cid12	SPBC1271.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506679633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761840	2539423	2539822	275988	276372	SPCC663.12	SPBC16G5.02c	cid12	SPBC16G5.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331663087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761841	2539423	3361316	275988	280392	SPCC663.12	SPBC2D10.03c	cid12	SPBC2D10.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507400328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761842	2539423	2542082	275988	278559	SPCC663.12	SPAC29B12.10c	cid12	pgt1	-	opt1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094514327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761843	2539423	3361149	275988	280225	SPCC663.12	SPCC1919.06c	cid12	wtf25	-	wtf9-pseudo	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.262847736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761844	2539423	2542554	275988	279011	SPCC663.12	SPAC1952.03	cid12	otu2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713448383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761845	2539423	2541353	275988	277864	SPCC663.12	SPBP35G2.11c	cid12	SPBP35G2.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387002312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761846	2539423	2541776	275988	278270	SPCC663.12	SPAC23H3.05c	cid12	swd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.20014634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761847	2539423	2541093	275988	277608	SPCC663.12	SPBC646.08c	cid12	SPBC646.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507723906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761848	2539423	2541982	275988	278467	SPCC663.12	SPAC23A1.06c	cid12	cmk2	-	mkp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.698657465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761849	2539423	2542249	275988	278719	SPCC663.12	SPAC30D11.14c	cid12	SPAC30D11.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637516521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761850	2539423	2542776	275988	279225	SPCC663.12	SPAC167.01	cid12	ire1	-	ppk4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035798948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761851	2539423	2540352	275988	276881	SPCC663.12	SPBC215.03c	cid12	csn1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809656369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761852	2539423	2543412	275988	279834	SPCC663.12	SPAC637.07	cid12	moe1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.338088245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761853	2539423	2541735	275988	278229	SPCC663.12	SPAC7D4.04	cid12	atg11	-	taf1|cvt9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09813752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761854	2539423	2542522	275988	278980	SPCC663.12	SPAC19A8.03	cid12	ymr1	-	SPAC19A8.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51194839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761855	2539423	2541929	275988	278417	SPCC663.12	SPAC23C4.12	cid12	hhp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86802783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761856	2539423	2539624	275988	276181	SPCC663.12	SPBC1289.16c	cid12	cao2	-	SPBC8E4.06|spao2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986673707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761857	2539423	2542946	275988	279386	SPCC663.12	SPAC6F12.03c	cid12	fsv1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037592046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761858	2539423	2539974	275988	276518	SPCC663.12	SPBC32H8.07	cid12	git5	-	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04015743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761859	2539423	2540836	275988	277354	SPCC663.12	SPBC18H10.19	cid12	vps38	-	atg14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.459317617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761860	2539423	2540077	275988	276615	SPCC663.12	SPBC17D11.04c	cid12	nto1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.12444909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761861	2539423	2542254	275988	278724	SPCC663.12	SPAC30D11.04c	cid12	nup124	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807082174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761862	2539423	2541900	275988	278390	SPCC663.12	SPAC23H4.17c	cid12	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450649984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761863	2539423	2542439	275988	278901	SPCC663.12	SPAC17A5.08	cid12	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.72364272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761864	2539423	2540990	275988	277506	SPCC663.12	SPBC36B7.06c	cid12	mug20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097851218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761865	2539423	2539368	275988	275934	SPCC663.12	SPCC16A11.07	cid12	coq10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503856857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761866	2539423	2538780	275988	275361	SPCC663.12	SPCC1840.07c	cid12	SPCC1840.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.715172185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761867	2539423	2541053	275988	277568	SPCC663.12	SPBC56F2.10c	cid12	alg5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.99076557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761868	2539423	2540967	275988	277483	SPCC663.12	SPBC36B7.08c	cid12	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201132097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761869	2539423	2542597	275988	279051	SPCC663.12	SPAP8A3.07c	cid12	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037732679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761870	2539423	2538690	275988	275275	SPCC663.12	SPCC1393.05	cid12	ers1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.274792548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761871	2539423	2539812	275988	276362	SPCC663.12	SPBC1347.02	cid12	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.842424873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761872	2539423	2540930	275988	277446	SPCC663.12	SPBC354.10	cid12	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.976940091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761873	2539423	2542869	275988	279314	SPCC663.12	SPAC140.02	cid12	gar2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810551797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761874	2539423	2540821	275988	277339	SPCC663.12	SPBC800.03	cid12	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.064483008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761875	2539423	2539908	275988	276454	SPCC663.12	SPBC13E7.06	cid12	msd1	-	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706805871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761876	2539423	2542170	275988	278645	SPCC663.12	SPAC17G8.13c	cid12	mst2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.461539419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761877	2539423	2543113	275988	279545	SPCC663.12	SPAC3F10.07c	cid12	erf4	-	mug91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818375541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761878	2539423	2542198	275988	278673	SPCC663.12	SPAC6F12.09	cid12	rdp1	-	rdr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871458551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761879	2539423	2541156	275988	277671	SPCC663.12	SPBC685.07c	cid12	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.066305013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761880	2539423	2540226	275988	276758	SPCC663.12	SPBC32H8.08c	cid12	omh5	-	pi016|SPACTOKYO_453.20	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924363979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761881	2539423	2539030	275988	275603	SPCC663.12	SPCP1E11.02	cid12	ppk38	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.941184117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761882	2539423	2540881	275988	277398	SPCC663.12	SPBC577.14c	cid12	spa1	-	spa	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864824025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761883	2539423	2543096	275988	279528	SPCC663.12	SPAC977.05c	cid12	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091102549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761884	2539423	2539346	275988	275912	SPCC663.12	SPCC569.04	cid12	SPCC569.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516456559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761885	2539423	2542416	275988	278880	SPCC663.12	SPAC589.03c	cid12	SPAC589.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982775606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761886	2539423	2540333	275988	276863	SPCC663.12	SPBC21B10.07	cid12	SPBC21B10.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986491314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761887	2539423	2539205	275988	275775	SPCC663.12	SPCC4B3.15	cid12	mid1	-	dmf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.236421661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761888	2539423	2538840	275988	275421	SPCC663.12	SPCC736.07c	cid12	SPCC736.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864095729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761889	2539423	2538861	275988	275441	SPCC663.12	SPCC1620.11	cid12	nup97	-	mug87	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.193387064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761890	2539423	2543384	275988	279806	SPCC663.12	SPAC637.06	cid12	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.269776703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761891	2539423	2540409	275988	276937	SPCC663.12	SPBC2D10.11c	cid12	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.274053061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761892	2539423	2543087	275988	279520	SPCC663.12	SPAC30C2.04	cid12	SPAC30C2.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.27461632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761893	2539423	2542424	275988	278886	SPCC663.12	SPAC1805.14	cid12	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.270817224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761894	2539423	2543448	275988	279868	SPCC663.12	SPAC3H5.07	cid12	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866738793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761895	2539423	2539450	275988	276013	SPCC663.12	SPCP31B10.04	cid12	SPCP31B10.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322748819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761896	2539423	2543472	275988	279892	SPCC663.12	SPAC959.04c	cid12	omh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.568829642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761897	2541289	2540131	277802	276668	SPBP35G2.09	SPBC1778.05c	usp103	SPBC1778.05c	yhc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.488655683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761898	2541289	2539845	277802	276393	SPBP35G2.09	SPBC12C2.02c	usp103	ste20	yhc1	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.601777816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761899	2539517	2540698	276079	277222	SPCC576.15c	SPBC215.11c	ksg1	SPBC215.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639106058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761900	2539517	2539197	276079	275768	SPCC576.15c	SPCC24B10.14c	ksg1	xlf1	-	mug104|nej1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.847371083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761901	2539517	2540338	276079	276867	SPCC576.15c	SPBC2G2.13c	ksg1	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580772949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761902	2539517	2542544	276079	279001	SPCC576.15c	SPAC18G6.10	ksg1	lem2	-	heh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.684453094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761903	2539517	2542549	276079	279006	SPCC576.15c	SPAC19A8.11c	ksg1	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194132068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761904	2539517	2542829	276079	279276	SPCC576.15c	SPAC13D6.02c	ksg1	byr3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933540791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761905	2539517	3361520	276079	280596	SPCC576.15c	SPAC1610.02c	ksg1	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.128568961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761906	2539517	2542021	276079	278504	SPCC576.15c	SPAP14E8.02	ksg1	tos4	-	SPAP14E8.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810747681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761907	2541178	2539147	277692	275719	SPBC725.02	SPCC622.12c	mpr1	gdh1	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.305056095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761908	2541178	2542862	277692	279308	SPBC725.02	SPAC140.03	mpr1	arb1	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.638051525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761909	2541178	2542577	277692	279033	SPBC725.02	SPAC19G12.15c	mpr1	tpp1	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.324767747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761910	2541178	2540885	277692	277402	SPBC725.02	SPBC660.14	mpr1	mik1	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.648305173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761911	2541178	2541343	277692	277854	SPBC725.02	SPBPB2B2.19c	mpr1	SPBPB2B2.19c	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.889690228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761912	2541178	2543634	277692	280048	SPBC725.02	SPAC3H8.04	mpr1	SPAC3H8.04	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327384331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761913	2541178	2541426	277692	277931	SPBC725.02	SPAC227.06	mpr1	SPAC227.06	spy1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.995052398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761914	2541178	2540435	277692	276963	SPBC725.02	SPBC25B2.03	mpr1	SPBC25B2.03	spy1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.803655999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761915	2541178	2541912	277692	278402	SPBC725.02	SPAC222.16c	mpr1	csn3	spy1	SPAC821.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.823569131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761916	2541178	2542127	277692	278603	SPBC725.02	SPAC1952.12c	mpr1	csn71	spy1	csn7|csn7a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.884484093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761917	2541178	2540131	277692	276668	SPBC725.02	SPBC1778.05c	mpr1	SPBC1778.05c	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.003022427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761918	2541178	2539156	277692	275728	SPBC725.02	SPCC1450.08c	mpr1	wtf16	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.694779528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761919	2541178	2543339	277692	279762	SPBC725.02	SPAC630.13c	mpr1	tsc2	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699343975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761920	2541178	2539008	277692	275581	SPBC725.02	SPCC584.03c	mpr1	SPCC584.03c	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321622423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761921	2541178	2539068	277692	275640	SPBC725.02	SPCC1442.11c	mpr1	SPCC1442.11c	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.524835312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761922	2541178	5802967	277692	858105	SPBC725.02	SPAC20G4.08	mpr1	pdc1	spy1	SPAC20G4.08|SPAC4F10.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504926761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761923	2541178	2541633	277692	278129	SPBC725.02	SPAC664.01c	mpr1	swi6	spy1	SPAC824.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933811183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761924	2541178	2543434	277692	279854	SPBC725.02	SPAC8F11.02c	mpr1	dph3	spy1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.975670524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761925	2541178	2540686	277692	277211	SPBC725.02	SPBC21D10.10	mpr1	bdc1	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.253619362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761926	2541178	2542345	277692	278811	SPBC725.02	SPAC1705.02	mpr1	SPAC1705.02	spy1	SPAC1F2.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.334647085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761927	2541178	2542040	277692	278521	SPBC725.02	SPAC212.01c	mpr1	SPAC212.01c	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.064977549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761928	2541178	2543320	277692	279744	SPBC725.02	SPAPJ695.01c	mpr1	SPAPJ695.01c	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.765029152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761929	2541178	2539332	277692	275898	SPBC725.02	SPCPB1C11.01	mpr1	amt1	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.566824138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761930	2541178	3361375	277692	280451	SPBC725.02	SPAC212.06c	mpr1	SPAC212.06c	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.34656732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761931	2541178	3361570	277692	280646	SPBC725.02	SPAC750.01	mpr1	SPAC750.01	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567288758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761932	2541178	2542468	277692	278929	SPBC725.02	SPAC1D4.09c	mpr1	rtf2	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.374586667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761933	2541178	2542107	277692	278583	SPBC725.02	SPAC30.01c	mpr1	sec72	spy1	sec7b|sec702	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.276080913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761934	2541178	2541951	277692	278438	SPBC725.02	SPAC222.05c	mpr1	mss1	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.381395864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761935	2541178	2542677	277692	279130	SPBC725.02	SPAC26F1.10c	mpr1	pyp1	spy1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.744146939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761936	2541178	2541313	277692	277825	SPBC725.02	SPBP26C9.02c	mpr1	car1	spy1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.15281206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761937	2541178	2542273	277692	278742	SPBC725.02	SPAC17H9.13c	mpr1	SPAC17H9.13c	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.015258292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761938	2541178	2541994	277692	278478	SPBC725.02	SPAC26A3.14c	mpr1	SPAC26A3.14c	spy1	SPAC23A6.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.516943526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761939	2541178	2539463	277692	276026	SPBC725.02	SPCC550.11	mpr1	SPCC550.11	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.178714806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761940	2541178	2539235	277692	275805	SPBC725.02	SPCC1682.15	mpr1	mug122	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568752451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761941	2541178	2543681	277692	280095	SPBC725.02	SPAC9.02c	mpr1	SPAC9.02c	spy1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.821349798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761942	2541178	2541964	277692	278450	SPBC725.02	SPAC2F3.08	mpr1	sut1	spy1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.409735395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761943	2541178	2539064	277692	275636	SPBC725.02	SPCC126.06	mpr1	twf1	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567886691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761944	2541178	2541558	277692	278057	SPBC725.02	SPAC1F7.08	mpr1	fio1	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.833711541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761945	2541178	2541346	277692	277857	SPBC725.02	SPBP8B7.08c	mpr1	ppm1	spy1	SPBP8B7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.178946395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761946	2541178	2542318	277692	278784	SPBC725.02	SPAC16C9.05	mpr1	cph1	spy1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.809171063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761947	2541178	2541560	277692	278059	SPBC725.02	SPAC24B11.12c	mpr1	SPAC24B11.12c	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.337657899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761948	2541178	2542023	277692	278506	SPBC725.02	SPAC20H4.10	mpr1	ufd2	spy1	SPAC145.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.273505588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761949	2541178	2541527	277692	278027	SPBC725.02	SPAC31A2.09c	mpr1	apm4	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.823123169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761950	2541178	2539792	277692	276342	SPBC725.02	SPBC1271.14	mpr1	SPBC1271.14	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.2205863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761951	2541178	2539823	277692	276373	SPBC725.02	SPBC16A3.18	mpr1	cip1	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.145620353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761952	2541178	2542220	277692	278694	SPBC725.02	SPAC1A6.03c	mpr1	SPAC1A6.03c	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.478913801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761953	2541178	2540663	277692	277188	SPBC725.02	SPBC56F2.06	mpr1	mug147	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569888229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761954	2541178	2542082	277692	278559	SPBC725.02	SPAC29B12.10c	mpr1	pgt1	spy1	opt1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.178860105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761955	2541178	2543426	277692	279846	SPBC725.02	SPAC631.02	mpr1	bdf2	spy1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.25986826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761956	2541178	2538972	277692	275546	SPBC725.02	SPCC1739.15	mpr1	wtf21	spy1	wtf3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.379580296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761957	2541178	2542213	277692	278687	SPBC725.02	SPAC3G6.13c	mpr1	rpl4101	spy1	rpl41-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453659958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761958	2541178	2542791	277692	279240	SPBC725.02	SPAC167.04	mpr1	pam17	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.882122983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761959	2541178	2541021	277692	277536	SPBC725.02	SPBC3B8.10c	mpr1	nem1	spy1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820938755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761960	2541178	2540964	277692	277480	SPBC725.02	SPBC365.16	mpr1	SPBC365.16	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978845617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761961	2541178	2539310	277692	275877	SPBC725.02	SPCC285.17	mpr1	spp27	spy1	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.195727177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761962	2541178	2543573	277692	279988	SPBC725.02	SPAC869.11	mpr1	cat1	spy1	SPAC922.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.327455234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761963	2541178	2542311	277692	278777	SPBC725.02	SPAC16A10.05c	mpr1	dad1	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.407151338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761964	2541178	2541885	277692	278375	SPBC725.02	SPAC22H10.03c	mpr1	kap114	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.4612921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761965	2541178	2539051	277692	275624	SPBC725.02	SPCC1183.11	mpr1	msy1	spy1	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388745676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761966	2541178	2539705	277692	276258	SPBC725.02	SPBC1105.10	mpr1	rav1	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704044287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761967	2541178	2542950	277692	279390	SPBC725.02	SPAC12B10.03	mpr1	bun62	spy1	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.408816382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761968	2541178	2543020	277692	279456	SPBC725.02	SPAC10F6.13c	mpr1	SPAC10F6.13c	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.377253662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761969	2541178	2542596	277692	279050	SPBC725.02	SPAC1B3.17	mpr1	clr2	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.199278227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761970	2541178	2538821	277692	275402	SPBC725.02	SPCC584.01c	mpr1	SPCC584.01c	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504145104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761971	2541178	2542964	277692	279404	SPBC725.02	SPAC12G12.07c	mpr1	SPAC12G12.07c	spy1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.402996374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761972	2541178	2541801	277692	278292	SPBC725.02	SPAC2F7.08c	mpr1	snf5	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.869075011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761973	2541178	2543593	277692	280008	SPBC725.02	SPAC4G9.10	mpr1	arg3	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.190976036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761974	2541178	2539845	277692	276393	SPBC725.02	SPBC12C2.02c	mpr1	ste20	spy1	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.000336142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761975	2541178	2543445	277692	279865	SPBC725.02	SPAC4F10.13c	mpr1	mpd2	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.255683396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761976	2541178	2542249	277692	278719	SPBC725.02	SPAC30D11.14c	mpr1	SPAC30D11.14c	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.928852883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761977	2541178	2539628	277692	276185	SPBC725.02	SPBC1604.03c	mpr1	SPBC1604.03c	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.123672171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761978	2541178	2543412	277692	279834	SPBC725.02	SPAC637.07	mpr1	moe1	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.869092247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761979	2541178	2540150	277692	276687	SPBC725.02	SPBC16E9.14c	mpr1	zrg17	spy1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.275522037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761980	2541178	2543638	277692	280052	SPBC725.02	SPAC3H8.09c	mpr1	nab3	spy1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.456909765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761981	2541178	2542168	277692	278643	SPBC725.02	SPAC17A5.16	mpr1	ftp105	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.922621975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761982	2541178	2542989	277692	279427	SPBC725.02	SPAC11E3.13c	mpr1	gas5	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.409554424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761983	2541178	2539484	277692	276047	SPBC725.02	SPCC594.04c	mpr1	SPCC594.04c	spy1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.675751391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761984	2541178	2542873	277692	279318	SPBC725.02	SPAC9G1.02	mpr1	wis4	spy1	wak1|wik1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.115044548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761985	2541178	2542921	277692	279362	SPBC725.02	SPAC1093.01	mpr1	ppr5	spy1	SPAC12B10.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504300099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761986	2541178	2542469	277692	278930	SPBC725.02	SPAC19A8.04	mpr1	erg5	spy1	cyp61	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.761008881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761987	2541178	2538871	277692	275450	SPBC725.02	SPCC1259.14c	mpr1	meu27	spy1	B8647-6	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510704913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761988	2541178	2539168	277692	275739	SPBC725.02	SPCC1620.08	mpr1	SPCC1620.08	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.498699943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761989	2541178	2542357	277692	278822	SPBC725.02	SPAC1782.07	mpr1	qcr8	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.24410605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761990	2541178	2543643	277692	280057	SPBC725.02	SPAC3G9.07c	mpr1	hos2	spy1	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.341071967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761991	2541178	2541899	277692	278389	SPBC725.02	SPAC22E12.11c	mpr1	set3	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.228685201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761992	2541178	2541739	277692	278233	SPBC725.02	SPAC2G11.10c	mpr1	SPAC2G11.10c	spy1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.108780403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761993	2541178	2543250	277692	279678	SPBC725.02	SPAC3G9.15c	mpr1	fcf2	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.077643379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761994	2541178	2543396	277692	279818	SPBC725.02	SPAC4D7.11	mpr1	dsc4	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.929497016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761995	2541178	2541824	277692	278315	SPBC725.02	SPAC27E2.02	mpr1	SPAC27E2.02	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.396971162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761996	2541178	2542861	277692	279307	SPBC725.02	SPAC13G7.13c	mpr1	msa1	spy1	SPAC6C3.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.259300065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761997	2541178	2538873	277692	275452	SPBC725.02	SPCC306.11	mpr1	SPCC306.11	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452496728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761998	2541178	2542710	277692	279163	SPBC725.02	SPAC750.08c	mpr1	SPAC750.08c	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.589452987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
761999	2541178	2541828	277692	278319	SPBC725.02	SPAC22H12.05c	mpr1	fsc1	spy1	SPAC22H12.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147882361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762000	2541178	2542976	277692	279414	SPBC725.02	SPAC9E9.09c	mpr1	atd1	spy1	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.764987589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762001	2541178	2540961	277692	277477	SPBC725.02	SPBC36B7.03	mpr1	sec63	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713013071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762002	2541178	2538849	277692	275430	SPBC725.02	SPCC330.14c	mpr1	rpl2402	spy1	rpl24-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.82421213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762003	2541178	2541903	277692	278393	SPBC725.02	SPAC22F8.05	mpr1	SPAC22F8.05	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.108787168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762004	2541178	2542431	277692	278893	SPBC725.02	SPAC1A6.01c	mpr1	SPAC1A6.01c	spy1	SPAC23C4.20c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.054724397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762005	2541178	2540327	277692	276857	SPBC725.02	SPBC31F10.07	mpr1	lsb5	spy1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.404063097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762006	2541178	2543301	277692	279726	SPBC725.02	SPAC977.17	mpr1	SPAC977.17	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.938478479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762007	2541178	2542519	277692	278977	SPBC725.02	SPAC19G12.08	mpr1	scs7	spy1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.155800655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762008	2541178	2539027	277692	275600	SPBC725.02	SPCC1322.08	mpr1	srk1	spy1	mkp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.61127338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762009	2541178	5802861	277692	857999	SPBC725.02	SPAC1D4.01	mpr1	tls1	spy1	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.62633648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762010	2541178	2542437	277692	278899	SPBC725.02	SPAC17A5.01	mpr1	pex6	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.828821625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762011	2541178	2543443	277692	279863	SPBC725.02	SPAC3H1.12c	mpr1	snt2	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572905808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762012	2541178	2539368	277692	275934	SPBC725.02	SPCC16A11.07	mpr1	coq10	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.448196758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762013	2541178	2542008	277692	278491	SPBC725.02	SPAC2G11.07c	mpr1	ptc3	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.694522582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762014	2541178	2538708	277692	275292	SPBC725.02	SPCC594.01	mpr1	SPCC594.01	spy1	SPCC736.16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.187731122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762015	2541178	2541536	277692	278036	SPBC725.02	SPAC1071.02	mpr1	mms19	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.411005432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762016	2541178	2540342	277692	276871	SPBC725.02	SPBC2G2.01c	mpr1	liz1	spy1	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.559338426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762017	2541178	2540967	277692	277483	SPBC725.02	SPBC36B7.08c	mpr1	SPBC36B7.08c	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.122240604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762018	2541178	2540184	277692	276717	SPBC725.02	SPBC106.12c	mpr1	SPBC106.12c	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.435677595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762019	2541178	2542550	277692	279007	SPBC725.02	SPAC1B3.02c	mpr1	SPAC1B3.02c	spy1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925589362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762020	2541178	2538884	277692	275462	SPBC725.02	SPCC1393.08	mpr1	SPCC1393.08	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.940243439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762021	2541178	2539421	277692	275986	SPBC725.02	SPCC794.11c	mpr1	ent3	spy1	SPCC794.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.671037126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762022	2541178	2542255	277692	278725	SPBC725.02	SPAC57A7.08	mpr1	pzh1	spy1	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.531266642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762023	2541178	2541488	277692	277990	SPBC725.02	SPAC227.17c	mpr1	SPAC227.17c	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572755606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762024	2541178	2542329	277692	278795	SPBC725.02	SPAC9G1.10c	mpr1	SPAC9G1.10c	spy1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926770323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762025	2541178	3361134	277692	280210	SPBC725.02	SPCC737.09c	mpr1	hmt1	spy1	SPCC74.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.177759144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762026	2541178	2542973	277692	279412	SPBC725.02	SPAC10F6.04	mpr1	SPAC10F6.04	spy1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.155435033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762027	2541178	3361520	277692	280596	SPBC725.02	SPAC1610.02c	mpr1	SPAC1610.02c	spy1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983095105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762028	2541178	2540643	277692	277168	SPBC725.02	SPBC19G7.06	mpr1	mbx1	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.928433385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762029	2541178	2542725	277692	279176	SPBC725.02	SPAC3A12.10	mpr1	rpl2001	spy1	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.44815506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762030	2541178	2540821	277692	277339	SPBC725.02	SPBC800.03	mpr1	clr3	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.959499038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762031	2541178	2542283	277692	278751	SPBC725.02	SPAC27F1.08	mpr1	pdt1	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.567013528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762032	2541178	2542806	277692	279254	SPBC725.02	SPAC1610.01	mpr1	saf5	spy1	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.968777778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762033	2541178	2543113	277692	279545	SPBC725.02	SPAC3F10.07c	mpr1	erf4	spy1	mug91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.753429344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762034	2541178	2543391	277692	279813	SPBC725.02	SPAC4G9.09c	mpr1	arg11	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.619360632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762035	2541178	2543332	277692	279755	SPBC725.02	SPAPB8E5.04c	mpr1	SPAPB8E5.04c	spy1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.727233683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762036	2541178	2541156	277692	277671	SPBC725.02	SPBC685.07c	mpr1	rpl2701	spy1	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.823724014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762037	2541178	2538762	277692	275345	SPBC725.02	SPCC306.04c	mpr1	set1	spy1	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.471979783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762038	2541178	2543628	277692	280042	SPBC725.02	SPAC3H8.10	mpr1	spo20	spy1	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.122571257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762039	2541178	2543051	277692	279486	SPBC725.02	SPAC1071.08	mpr1	rpp203	spy1	rla6|rpp2-3|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.564153133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762040	2541178	2539555	277692	276116	SPBC725.02	SPCC4B3.08	mpr1	lsg1	spy1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090534104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762041	2541178	2540779	277692	277298	SPBC725.02	SPBC19F8.06c	mpr1	meu22	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.858913257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762042	2541178	2542881	277692	279326	SPBC725.02	SPAC13F5.03c	mpr1	gld1	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.940043126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762043	2541178	2541121	277692	277636	SPBC725.02	SPBC609.03	mpr1	iqw1	spy1	iqwd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.575197744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762044	2541178	2539925	277692	276469	SPBC725.02	SPBC16H5.13	mpr1	SPBC16H5.13	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.950054793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762045	2541178	2540152	277692	276688	SPBC725.02	SPBC12C2.03c	mpr1	SPBC12C2.03c	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.33493706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762046	2541178	2538717	277692	275301	SPBC725.02	SPCC1235.02	mpr1	bio2	spy1	SPCC320.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.900325501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762047	2541178	2539246	277692	275816	SPBC725.02	SPCC18.13	mpr1	SPCC18.13	spy1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048522607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762048	2541178	2543096	277692	279528	SPBC725.02	SPAC977.05c	mpr1	SPAC977.05c	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.371603349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762049	2541178	2543130	277692	279562	SPBC725.02	SPAC869.05c	mpr1	SPAC869.05c	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329658104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762050	2541178	2541432	277692	277937	SPBC725.02	SPAC1F5.05c	mpr1	mso1	spy1	SPAC1F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.562270379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762051	2541178	2543066	277692	279499	SPBC725.02	SPAC343.12	mpr1	rds1	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.698067308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762052	2541178	2539239	277692	275809	SPBC725.02	SPCC1020.10	mpr1	oca2	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.554935028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762053	2541178	2541425	277692	277930	SPBC725.02	SPAC2C4.17c	mpr1	msy2	spy1	SPAC2C4.17c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.414963287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762054	2541178	2539816	277692	276366	SPBC725.02	SPBC12C2.04	mpr1	SPBC12C2.04	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318678046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762055	2541178	2543368	277692	279790	SPBC725.02	SPAC630.06c	mpr1	SPAC630.06c	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.002907047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762056	2541178	2541531	277692	278031	SPBC725.02	SPAC25A8.01c	mpr1	fft3	spy1	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.765645094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762057	2541178	2540654	277692	277179	SPBC725.02	SPBC19F5.01c	mpr1	puc1	spy1	SPBP8B7.32c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817607259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762058	2541178	2539013	277692	275586	SPBC725.02	SPCC364.03	mpr1	rpl1702	spy1	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714531671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762059	2541178	2542418	277692	278881	SPBC725.02	SPAC1805.07c	mpr1	dad2	spy1	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.971604669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762060	2541178	2542826	277692	279273	SPBC725.02	SPAC13G6.09	mpr1	SPAC13G6.09	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.624431714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762061	2541178	2543420	277692	279842	SPBC725.02	SPAC3H1.04c	mpr1	mdm31	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.873250159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762062	2541178	2542250	277692	278720	SPBC725.02	SPAC17D4.03c	mpr1	cis4	spy1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.825218495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762063	2541178	2539207	277692	275777	SPBC725.02	SPCC285.09c	mpr1	cgs2	spy1	pde1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.76336534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762064	2541178	2539928	277692	276472	SPBC725.02	SPBC1604.08c	mpr1	imp1	spy1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193619001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762065	2541178	2542386	277692	278850	SPBC725.02	SPAC1805.01c	mpr1	ppk6	spy1	SPAPJ736.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.82355227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762066	2541178	2539205	277692	275775	SPBC725.02	SPCC4B3.15	mpr1	mid1	spy1	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.938138184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762067	2541178	2540563	277692	277090	SPBC725.02	SPBC25H2.09	mpr1	SPBC25H2.09	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.977538961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762068	2541178	2540278	277692	276809	SPBC725.02	SPBC1A4.04	mpr1	SPBC1A4.04	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.215486852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762069	2541178	2540551	277692	277078	SPBC725.02	SPBC23E6.01c	mpr1	cxr1	spy1	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.621007308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762070	2541178	2538840	277692	275421	SPBC725.02	SPCC736.07c	mpr1	SPCC736.07c	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.686210643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762071	2541178	2542119	277692	278595	SPBC725.02	SPAC1834.08	mpr1	mak1	spy1	phk3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035834991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762072	2541178	2539169	277692	275740	SPBC725.02	SPCC1235.11	mpr1	mpc1	spy1	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.219002807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762073	2541178	2543400	277692	279822	SPBC725.02	SPAC3G9.11c	mpr1	SPAC3G9.11c	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6978405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762074	2541178	2541357	277692	277868	SPBC725.02	SPBPB7E8.01	mpr1	SPBPB7E8.01	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.955373299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762075	2541178	2539181	277692	275752	SPBC725.02	SPCC622.14	mpr1	SPCC622.14	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.774851479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762076	2541178	2541806	277692	278297	SPBC725.02	SPAC4G8.13c	mpr1	prz1	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.933777705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762077	2541178	2543684	277692	280098	SPBC725.02	SPAC4G8.03c	mpr1	SPAC4G8.03c	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.564142948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762078	2541178	2538854	277692	275435	SPBC725.02	SPCP1E11.05c	mpr1	are2	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507996502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762079	2541178	2540314	277692	276844	SPBC725.02	SPBC2G5.03	mpr1	ctu1	spy1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.283845809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762080	2541178	2542424	277692	278886	SPBC725.02	SPAC1805.14	mpr1	SPAC1805.14	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.247897899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762081	2541178	2543333	277692	279756	SPBC725.02	SPAC694.02	mpr1	SPAC694.02	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.320739767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762082	2541178	2542656	277692	279110	SPBC725.02	SPAC2E1P3.05c	mpr1	SPAC2E1P3.05c	spy1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046453723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762083	2541178	2540938	277692	277454	SPBC725.02	SPBC365.14c	mpr1	uge1	spy1	gal10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994070541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762084	2541178	2542561	277692	279017	SPBC725.02	SPAC31G5.17c	mpr1	rps1001	spy1	rps10-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.438778899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762085	2541178	2542680	277692	279133	SPBC725.02	SPAC26F1.09	mpr1	gyp51	spy1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.082733889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762086	2541178	2541576	277692	278073	SPBC725.02	SPBC1348.02	mpr1	SPBC1348.02	spy1	SPAC1348.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.144582358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762087	2541178	2542094	277692	278571	SPBC725.02	SPAC29B12.06c	mpr1	rcd1	spy1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093302567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762088	2541178	2539599	277692	276157	SPBC725.02	SPCP31B10.02	mpr1	SPCP31B10.02	spy1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929865749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762089	2541178	2542836	277692	279282	SPBC725.02	SPAC13G7.06	mpr1	met16	spy1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.339351154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762090	2541573	2540220	278070	276753	SPAC16.04	SPBC337.03	dus3	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377581938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762091	2541573	2541530	278070	278030	SPAC16.04	SPAC57A10.10c	dus3	sla1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576867666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762092	2541573	2539574	278070	276134	SPAC16.04	SPCPB16A4.04c	dus3	trm8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.188354861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762093	2541573	2541943	278070	278430	SPAC16.04	SPAC222.07c	dus3	hri2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318916372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762094	2541573	2540107	278070	276644	SPAC16.04	SPBC106.08c	dus3	mug2	-	B13958-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514503082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762095	2541573	2540533	278070	277061	SPAC16.04	SPBC29A10.16c	dus3	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.78674016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762096	2541573	2542453	278070	278914	SPAC16.04	SPAC186.01	dus3	pfl9	-	SPAC186.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699943292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762097	2541573	3361389	278070	280465	SPAC16.04	SPAC977.13c	dus3	SPAC977.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.146851432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762098	2541573	2539246	278070	275816	SPAC16.04	SPCC18.13	dus3	SPCC18.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.289280224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762099	2541573	2543136	278070	279568	SPAC16.04	SPBC1348.07	dus3	SPBC1348.07	-	SPAC1348.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.259479578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762100	2541573	2540304	278070	276834	SPAC16.04	SPBC354.13	dus3	rga6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.839411834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762101	2541573	2542574	278070	279030	SPAC16.04	SPAC186.05c	dus3	SPAC186.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989149589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762102	2541371	2539930	277882	276474	SPBP4H10.17c	SPBC1198.11c	SPBP4H10.17c	reb1	mrps2	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.53675624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762103	2541371	2542555	277882	279012	SPBP4H10.17c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBP4H10.17c	SPAC1952.06c	mrps2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981831898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762104	2541371	2543319	277882	279743	SPBP4H10.17c	SPAC6B12.09	SPBP4H10.17c	trm10	mrps2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041905383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762105	2541371	2542126	277882	278602	SPBP4H10.17c	SPAC1B3.05	SPBP4H10.17c	not3	mrps2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440680138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762106	2541371	2539348	277882	275914	SPBP4H10.17c	SPCC18B5.07c	SPBP4H10.17c	nup61	mrps2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.893313289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762107	2541371	2543619	277882	280033	SPBP4H10.17c	SPAC4F10.04	SPBP4H10.17c	ypa1	mrps2	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.683407667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762108	2541371	2540451	277882	276979	SPBP4H10.17c	SPBC2G2.17c	SPBP4H10.17c	SPBC2G2.17c	mrps2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.705438056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762109	2540719	2542207	277242	278682	SPBC216.05	SPAC17H9.10c	rad3	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.278077474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762110	2540719	2541656	277242	278152	SPBC216.05	SPAC25H1.06	rad3	pcf3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331959361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762111	2540719	2541512	277242	278013	SPBC216.05	SPAC11E3.08c	rad3	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.053960224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762112	2540719	2540131	277242	276668	SPBC216.05	SPBC1778.05c	rad3	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.950345464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762113	2540719	2543164	277242	279595	SPBC216.05	SPAC3G6.06c	rad3	rad2	-	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.645813651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762114	2540719	2542071	277242	278548	SPBC216.05	SPAC26H5.03	rad3	pcf2	-	cac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.313655883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762115	2540719	2538775	277242	275357	SPBC216.05	SPCC23B6.05c	rad3	ssb3	-	rpa3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.030532456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762116	2540719	2540945	277242	277461	SPBC216.05	SPBC342.06c	rad3	rtt109	-	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.96807396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762117	2540719	2543029	277242	279465	SPBC216.05	SPAC11G7.01	rad3	SPAC11G7.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32809849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762118	2540719	2543685	277242	280099	SPBC216.05	SPAC3C7.03c	rad3	rad55	-	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.211437678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762119	2540719	2541580	277242	278077	SPBC216.05	SPAC1687.05	rad3	pli1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.206552257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762120	2540719	2539352	277242	275918	SPBC216.05	SPCC188.07	rad3	ccq1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.149657006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762121	2540719	2543078	277242	279511	SPBC216.05	SPAC31A2.15c	rad3	dcc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569575304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762122	2540719	2542036	277242	278518	SPBC216.05	SPAC23A1.19c	rad3	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.631166052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762123	2540719	2539467	277242	276030	SPBC216.05	SPCC417.07c	rad3	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579102584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762124	2540719	2540348	277242	276877	SPBC216.05	SPBC29A10.05	rad3	exo1	-	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.734357802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762125	2540719	2540338	277242	276867	SPBC216.05	SPBC2G2.13c	rad3	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.019986684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762126	2540719	2540352	277242	276881	SPBC216.05	SPBC215.03c	rad3	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.971489266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762127	2540719	2543510	277242	279928	SPBC216.05	SPAC30D11.07	rad3	nth1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.040568808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762128	2540719	2541496	277242	277998	SPBC216.05	SPAC23D3.09	rad3	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580757769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762129	2540719	2542007	277242	278490	SPBC216.05	SPAC20H4.07	rad3	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.329331845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762130	2540719	2541488	277242	277990	SPBC216.05	SPAC227.17c	rad3	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.618316026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762131	2540719	2543387	277242	279809	SPBC216.05	SPAPB1E7.02c	rad3	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.636309969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762132	2540719	2540481	277242	277009	SPBC216.05	SPBC2D10.12	rad3	rhp23	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.61907699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762133	2541846	2541117	278337	277632	SPAC20G4.01	SPBC646.13	caf16	sds23	SPAC22F8.13	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197965933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762134	2541846	2542816	278337	279263	SPAC20G4.01	SPAC4G8.11c	caf16	atp10	SPAC22F8.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924615486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762135	2541846	2542177	278337	278652	SPAC20G4.01	SPAC17H9.08	caf16	SPAC17H9.08	SPAC22F8.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.340306625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762136	2541846	2539603	278337	276161	SPAC20G4.01	SPBC1289.06c	caf16	ppr8	SPAC22F8.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199639066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762137	2541846	2539715	278337	276268	SPAC20G4.01	SPBC1778.09	caf16	SPBC1778.09	SPAC22F8.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.624217308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762138	2541846	2540930	278337	277446	SPAC20G4.01	SPBC354.10	caf16	def1	SPAC22F8.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.203831617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762139	2541846	2542453	278337	278914	SPAC20G4.01	SPAC186.01	caf16	pfl9	SPAC22F8.13	SPAC186.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.230328159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762140	2541846	2541478	278337	277980	SPAC20G4.01	SPAC2F7.17	caf16	mrf1	SPAC22F8.13	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808535437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762141	2541961	2542023	278448	278506	SPAC23C4.02	SPAC20H4.10	crn1	ufd2	-	SPAC145.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.249333905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762142	2541961	2542679	278448	279132	SPAC23C4.02	SPAC12B10.07	crn1	acp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.758431453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762143	2541961	2543390	278448	279812	SPAC23C4.02	SPAC631.01c	crn1	acp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.616200801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762144	2541961	2539101	278448	275673	SPAC23C4.02	SPCC736.04c	crn1	gma12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385575166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762145	2541961	2539555	278448	276116	SPAC23C4.02	SPCC4B3.08	crn1	lsg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700075147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762146	2542677	2538939	279130	275514	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC1672.04c	pyp1	SPCC1672.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.570646355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762147	2542677	2539050	279130	275623	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC11E10.08	pyp1	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.96967266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762148	2542677	2540060	279130	276598	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC106.01	pyp1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.080329233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762149	2542677	3361210	279130	280286	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC16E9.16c	pyp1	lsd90	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197328718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762150	2542677	2542577	279130	279033	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC19G12.15c	pyp1	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.014345946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762151	2542677	2540105	279130	276642	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC106.04	pyp1	ada1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.843864146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762152	2542677	2539405	279130	275970	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC553.03	pyp1	pex1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379529546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762153	2542677	2542080	279130	278557	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC27D7.03c	pyp1	mei2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.337554214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762154	2542677	2540913	279130	277429	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC56F2.08c	pyp1	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.552983316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762155	2542677	2540026	279130	276570	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC16D10.08c	pyp1	hsp104	-	SPBC16D10.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.907560197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762156	2542677	2538977	279130	275551	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC1020.06c	pyp1	tal1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.130300478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762157	2542677	2542643	279130	279097	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC2C4.07c	pyp1	dis32	-	SPAC2C4.07c|dis3L2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.507811604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762158	2542677	2540524	279130	277052	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC21B10.08c	pyp1	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.683963675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762159	2542677	2539202	279130	275773	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC162.10	pyp1	ppk33	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.165754872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762160	2542677	2539939	279130	276483	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC11G11.01	pyp1	fis1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391583569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762161	2542677	2541438	279130	277943	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC23G3.10c	pyp1	ssr3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.337408047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762162	2542677	2540410	279130	276938	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC2D10.04	pyp1	SPBC2D10.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808850034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762163	2542677	2542224	279130	278697	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC19G12.03	pyp1	cda1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32880165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762164	2542677	2541117	279130	277632	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC646.13	pyp1	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.704461215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762165	2542677	2541345	279130	277856	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBP35G2.07	pyp1	ilv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.811942213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762166	2542677	2542546	279130	279003	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC1399.05c	pyp1	toe1	-	SPAC1399.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875980566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762167	2542677	2542492	279130	278951	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC1B9.02c	pyp1	sck1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516156035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762168	2542677	2543434	279130	279854	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC8F11.02c	pyp1	dph3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.206272702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762169	2542677	5802945	279130	858083	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC19G12.16c	pyp1	adg2	-	SPAC23A1.01c|mug46	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852850926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762170	2542677	2540686	279130	277211	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC21D10.10	pyp1	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.242059497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762171	2542677	2542701	279130	279154	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC26H5.05	pyp1	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097720505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762172	2542677	2538922	279130	275499	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC16C4.10	pyp1	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.075030437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762173	2542677	2541082	279130	277597	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC577.11	pyp1	SPBC577.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.500268094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762174	2542677	2540455	279130	276983	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC215.05	pyp1	gpd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.466670825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762175	2542677	2543320	279130	279744	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAPJ695.01c	pyp1	SPAPJ695.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571258684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762176	2542677	3361375	279130	280451	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC212.06c	pyp1	SPAC212.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.315418313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762177	2542677	2539579	279130	276138	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCP31B10.05	pyp1	tdp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03592267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762178	2542677	2540560	279130	277087	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC2D10.14c	pyp1	myo51	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.842452452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762179	2542677	2541012	279130	277527	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC3H7.12	pyp1	rav2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.125901401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762180	2542677	2541058	279130	277573	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC3H7.09	pyp1	erf2	-	mug142	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.764868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762181	2542677	2541994	279130	278478	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC26A3.14c	pyp1	SPAC26A3.14c	-	SPAC23A6.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.041650954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762182	2542677	2539463	279130	276026	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC550.11	pyp1	SPCC550.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.222877558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762183	2542677	2540029	279130	276573	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC16A3.01	pyp1	spn3	-	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582129419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762184	2542677	2539434	279130	275997	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC757.09c	pyp1	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.346783346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762185	2542677	2543453	279130	279873	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC3G9.03	pyp1	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329595259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762186	2542677	2541503	279130	278005	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC22A12.01c	pyp1	pso2	-	SPAC56F8.17c|snm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.505237528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762187	2542677	2543030	279130	279466	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC12B10.10	pyp1	nod1	-	SPAC12B10.10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.118500671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762188	2542677	2543048	279130	279483	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC3F10.02c	pyp1	trk1	-	sptrk	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.518443517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762189	2542677	2541323	279130	277835	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBP35G2.14	pyp1	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.981082719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762190	2542677	2542135	279130	278611	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC13A11.04c	pyp1	ubp8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810639803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762191	2542677	2542318	279130	278784	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC16C9.05	pyp1	cph1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.724480971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762192	2542677	2541527	279130	278027	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC31A2.09c	pyp1	apm4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.209745236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762193	2542677	2542277	279130	278746	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC17A5.02c	pyp1	dbr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.247288901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762194	2542677	2543296	279130	279721	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC9E9.03	pyp1	leu2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638759344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762195	2542677	2541923	279130	278411	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC23C4.09c	pyp1	SPAC23C4.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.906889248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762196	2542677	2539961	279130	276505	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC1198.09	pyp1	ubc16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.318565787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762197	2542677	2543426	279130	279846	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC631.02	pyp1	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851240537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762198	2542677	2538972	279130	275546	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC1739.15	pyp1	wtf21	-	wtf3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.55879213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762199	2542677	2540825	279130	277343	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC428.08c	pyp1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.382656443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762200	2542677	2541246	279130	277760	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC8E4.02c	pyp1	SPBC8E4.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51198122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762201	2542677	2540964	279130	277480	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC365.16	pyp1	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.624853763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762202	2542677	2539467	279130	276030	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC417.07c	pyp1	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809656369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762203	2542677	2542311	279130	278777	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC16A10.05c	pyp1	dad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.933895433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762204	2542677	2539051	279130	275624	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC1183.11	pyp1	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.062939547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762205	2542677	2542695	279130	279148	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC12B10.09	pyp1	pet801	-	SPAC12B10.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.988301365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762206	2542677	2543020	279130	279456	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC10F6.13c	pyp1	SPAC10F6.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.504481387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762207	2542677	2538821	279130	275402	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC584.01c	pyp1	SPCC584.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6175263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762208	2542677	2541776	279130	278270	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC23H3.05c	pyp1	swd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.941992846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762209	2542677	2539628	279130	276185	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC1604.03c	pyp1	SPBC1604.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640999255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762210	2542677	2542776	279130	279225	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC167.01	pyp1	ire1	-	ppk4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.131350883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762211	2542677	2539990	279130	276534	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC1289.14	pyp1	SPBC1289.14	-	SPBC8E4.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385142065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762212	2542677	2543412	279130	279834	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC637.07	pyp1	moe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.318318721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762213	2542677	2540673	279130	277198	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC1D7.03	pyp1	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.617580158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762214	2542677	2542464	279130	278925	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC1A6.09c	pyp1	lag1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.334730636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762215	2542677	2541578	279130	278075	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC25B8.05	pyp1	deg1	-	SPAC25B8.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.139541646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762216	2542677	2542873	279130	279318	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC9G1.02	pyp1	wis4	-	wak1|wik1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200295095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762217	2542677	2541109	279130	277624	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC6B1.02	pyp1	ppk30	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19735614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762218	2542677	2542921	279130	279362	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC1093.01	pyp1	ppr5	-	SPAC12B10.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.187927608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762219	2542677	2542469	279130	278930	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC19A8.04	pyp1	erg5	-	cyp61	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.40970407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762220	2542677	2541183	279130	277697	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC725.14	pyp1	arg6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324126111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762221	2542677	2539689	279130	276244	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC1861.03	pyp1	mak10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.753129117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762222	2542677	2540831	279130	277349	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC428.02c	pyp1	eca39	-	SPBC582.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.349998104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762223	2542677	2543250	279130	279678	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC3G9.15c	pyp1	fcf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.185914369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762224	2542677	2539667	279130	276222	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC13G1.08c	pyp1	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.336945799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762225	2542677	2542861	279130	279307	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC13G7.13c	pyp1	msa1	-	SPAC6C3.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392366234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762226	2542677	2540665	279130	277190	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC83.02c	pyp1	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.406990277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762227	2542677	2538945	279130	275519	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC1739.06c	pyp1	SPCC1739.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331226931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762228	2542677	2540290	279130	276821	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC29A3.02c	pyp1	his7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913523044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762229	2542677	2539815	279130	276365	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC1105.02c	pyp1	lys4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.563346264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762230	2542677	2539217	279130	275787	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC1223.03c	pyp1	gut2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38046787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762231	2542677	2538849	279130	275430	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC330.14c	pyp1	rpl2402	-	rpl24-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.999474829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762232	2542677	2539974	279130	276518	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC32H8.07	pyp1	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.517034559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762233	2542677	2540107	279130	276644	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC106.08c	pyp1	mug2	-	B13958-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503705551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762234	2542677	2541241	279130	277755	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC887.17	pyp1	SPBC887.17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876029152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762235	2542677	2542519	279130	278977	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC19G12.08	pyp1	scs7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.977873347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762236	2542677	5802861	279130	857999	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC1D4.01	pyp1	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.84596178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762237	2542677	2543683	279130	280097	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAPB1E7.04c	pyp1	SPAPB1E7.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.560697447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762238	2542677	2543443	279130	279863	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC3H1.12c	pyp1	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709024998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762239	2542677	2539368	279130	275934	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC16A11.07	pyp1	coq10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.919085172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762240	2542677	2540019	279130	276563	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC1685.01	pyp1	pmp1	-	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.157769835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762241	2542677	2542008	279130	278491	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC2G11.07c	pyp1	ptc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.001931411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762242	2542677	2538708	279130	275292	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC594.01	pyp1	SPCC594.01	-	SPCC736.16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.155554904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762243	2542677	2541536	279130	278036	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC1071.02	pyp1	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.648124997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762244	2542677	2541464	279130	277966	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC222.08c	pyp1	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.770461619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762245	2542677	2540967	279130	277483	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC36B7.08c	pyp1	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.401026255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762246	2542677	2540184	279130	276717	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC106.12c	pyp1	SPBC106.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.907640346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762247	2542677	2542773	279130	279222	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC16.01	pyp1	rho2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.043220683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762248	2542677	2540882	279130	277399	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC4F6.08c	pyp1	mrpl39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512671802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762249	2542677	2539711	279130	276264	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC1683.09c	pyp1	frp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.199780357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762250	2542677	2540687	279130	277212	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC21D10.08c	pyp1	SPBC21D10.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453419129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762251	2542677	2540229	279130	276761	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC31F10.15c	pyp1	atp15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6125305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762252	2542677	2540357	279130	276886	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC2F12.05c	pyp1	SPBC2F12.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.853379599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762253	2542677	2538884	279130	275462	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC1393.08	pyp1	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.439385113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762254	2542677	3361105	279130	280181	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC188.10c	pyp1	SPCC188.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.436968692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762255	2542677	2539812	279130	276362	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC1347.02	pyp1	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.82131337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762256	2542677	2540193	279130	276726	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC1289.10c	pyp1	adn2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808529758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762257	2542677	2539605	279130	276163	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC1105.13c	pyp1	SPBC1105.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.937208444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762258	2542677	2541378	279130	277889	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBP8B7.21	pyp1	ubp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.492124293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762259	2542677	2542781	279130	279230	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC57A10.12c	pyp1	ura3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.566976693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762260	2542677	2541017	279130	277532	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC36.07	pyp1	elp1	-	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.258911294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762261	2542677	2540946	279130	277462	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC36.04	pyp1	cys11	-	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.484758748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762262	2542677	2540821	279130	277339	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC800.03	pyp1	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.872651138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762263	2542677	2539906	279130	276452	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC16G5.17	pyp1	SPBC16G5.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323759681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762264	2542677	2542283	279130	278751	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC27F1.08	pyp1	pdt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445913054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762265	2542677	2539490	279130	276053	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC364.07	pyp1	ser3	-	SPCC364.07|SPCC4G3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.133679579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762266	2542677	2540959	279130	277475	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC365.12c	pyp1	ish1	-	isp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.487088613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762267	2542677	2540460	279130	276988	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC2A9.07c	pyp1	hpz1	-	SPBC2A9.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709195673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762268	2542677	2539842	279130	276390	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC14C8.15	pyp1	SPBC14C8.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.993761587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762269	2542677	2539354	279130	275920	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC4F11.03c	pyp1	SPCC4F11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.320109755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762270	2542677	2541156	279130	277671	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC685.07c	pyp1	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.629015229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762271	2542677	2542759	279130	279209	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC9G1.07	pyp1	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571232046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762272	2542677	2539499	279130	276062	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC622.08c	pyp1	hta1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.333517233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762273	2542677	2538762	279130	275345	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC306.04c	pyp1	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.801664805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762274	2542677	2539555	279130	276116	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC4B3.08	pyp1	lsg1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.279485978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762275	2542677	2542327	279130	278793	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC16C9.06c	pyp1	upf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.402668152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762276	2542677	2540619	279130	277145	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC25H2.15	pyp1	SPBC25H2.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.006579503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762277	2542677	2539925	279130	276469	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC16H5.13	pyp1	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.596558011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762278	2542677	2538966	279130	275540	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC18.10	pyp1	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.520776823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762279	2542677	2543096	279130	279528	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC977.05c	pyp1	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.622356239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762280	2542677	2542075	279130	278552	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC27D7.06	pyp1	etf1	-	SPAC27D7.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639670059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762281	2542677	2541279	279130	277792	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC8E4.03	pyp1	SPBC8E4.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387307326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762282	2542677	2541432	279130	277937	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC1F5.05c	pyp1	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.270278007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762283	2542677	2543066	279130	279499	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC343.12	pyp1	rds1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.378344598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762284	2542677	2543662	279130	280076	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC9.07c	pyp1	SPAC9.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.915085454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762285	2542677	2540725	279130	277248	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC215.14c	pyp1	vps20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.517735139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762286	2542677	2539471	279130	276034	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC576.14	pyp1	dph5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331092698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762287	2542677	2539816	279130	276366	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC12C2.04	pyp1	SPBC12C2.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.566797482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762288	2542677	2541531	279130	278031	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC25A8.01c	pyp1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.170033331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762289	2542677	2540654	279130	277179	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC19F5.01c	pyp1	puc1	-	SPBP8B7.32c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.893376676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762290	2542677	2539013	279130	275586	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC364.03	pyp1	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.126250484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762291	2542677	2540325	279130	276855	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC21B10.10	pyp1	rps402	-	rps4-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.446068464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762292	2542677	2540164	279130	276699	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC1683.03c	pyp1	SPBC1683.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.91811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762293	2542677	2539514	279130	276076	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC663.14c	pyp1	trp663	-	SPCC663.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.39148373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762294	2542677	2543439	279130	279859	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAPB1A10.13	pyp1	SPAPB1A10.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258501374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762295	2542677	2543437	279130	279857	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAPB1A10.14	pyp1	pof15	-	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639221192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762296	2542677	2540629	279130	277155	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC21D10.09c	pyp1	rkr1	-	SPBC21D10.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443276534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762297	2542677	2542826	279130	279273	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC13G6.09	pyp1	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.562503104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762298	2542677	2541380	279130	277891	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBPB2B2.13	pyp1	gal1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.667063559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762299	2542677	2543420	279130	279842	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC3H1.04c	pyp1	mdm31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.25112336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762300	2542677	2540064	279130	276602	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC1718.02	pyp1	hop1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516930273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762301	2542677	2540936	279130	277452	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC800.05c	pyp1	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.333371359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762302	2542677	2539928	279130	276472	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC1604.08c	pyp1	imp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.719769599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762303	2542677	2539702	279130	276255	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC1604.12	pyp1	SPBC1604.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.20121093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762304	2542677	2539205	279130	275775	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC4B3.15	pyp1	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.895774157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762305	2542677	2539375	279130	275941	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC4G3.11	pyp1	mug154	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.841203452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762306	2542677	2540551	279130	277078	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC23E6.01c	pyp1	cxr1	-	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391998635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762307	2542677	2543380	279130	279802	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC4G9.16c	pyp1	rpl901	-	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507949314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762308	2542677	2539189	279130	275760	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC1682.16	pyp1	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634450339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762309	2542677	2539169	279130	275740	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC1235.11	pyp1	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.961990551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762310	2542677	2541357	279130	277868	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBPB7E8.01	pyp1	SPBPB7E8.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.125139666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762311	2542677	2541709	279130	278204	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC3C7.02c	pyp1	pil2	-	SPAC3C7.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.964616027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762312	2542677	2541806	279130	278297	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC4G8.13c	pyp1	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.893268569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762313	2542677	2543327	279130	279750	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC1D4.06c	pyp1	csk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037036554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762314	2542677	2539259	279130	275829	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC553.05c	pyp1	wtf6	-	SPCC553.05c|SPCC553.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814075116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762315	2542677	2540451	279130	276979	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC2G2.17c	pyp1	SPBC2G2.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.411090369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762316	2542677	2542175	279130	278650	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC1F3.02c	pyp1	mkh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.895215538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762317	2542677	2540314	279130	276844	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC2G5.03	pyp1	ctu1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.668506763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762318	2542677	2540558	279130	277085	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC2D10.17	pyp1	clr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.682705962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762319	2542677	2542424	279130	278886	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC1805.14	pyp1	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.873116749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762320	2542677	2542561	279130	279017	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC31G5.17c	pyp1	rps1001	-	rps10-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.917870284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762321	2542677	2540208	279130	276741	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC9B6.03	pyp1	SPBC9B6.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.207293236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762322	2542677	2542617	279130	279071	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC13A11.01c	pyp1	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.756208478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762323	2542677	2540798	279130	277317	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC19C7.01	pyp1	mni1	-	SPBC32F12.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.936859681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762324	2539734	2539981	276286	276525	SPBC1604.16c	SPBC1289.09	SPBC1604.16c	tim21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645318852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762325	2539734	2539624	276286	276181	SPBC1604.16c	SPBC1289.16c	SPBC1604.16c	cao2	-	SPBC8E4.06|spao2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442692881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762326	2539734	2539354	276286	275920	SPBC1604.16c	SPCC4F11.03c	SPBC1604.16c	SPCC4F11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.762453217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762327	2539734	2540498	276286	277026	SPBC1604.16c	SPBC27.02c	SPBC1604.16c	ask1	-	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.665971452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762328	2539734	2541531	276286	278031	SPBC1604.16c	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1604.16c	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.012154681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762329	2539734	2542418	276286	278881	SPBC1604.16c	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC1604.16c	dad2	-	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.355552815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762330	2539734	2541789	276286	278281	SPBC1604.16c	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC1604.16c	iwr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.842848585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762331	2539734	2542303	276286	278770	SPBC1604.16c	SPAC1687.21	SPBC1604.16c	SPAC1687.21	-	SPAC222.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047418659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762332	2539734	2542059	276286	278537	SPBC1604.16c	SPAC328.06	SPBC1604.16c	ubp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704247005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762333	2538848	2539050	275429	275623	SPCC613.12c	SPCC11E10.08	raf1	rik1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869547061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762334	2538848	2540556	275429	277083	SPCC613.12c	SPBC19F8.04c	raf1	lcl3	clr8|cmc1|dos1	SPBC19F8.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.908805013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762335	2538848	2538721	275429	275305	SPCC613.12c	SPCC1494.10	raf1	adn3	clr8|cmc1|dos1	SPCC70.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.055495774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762336	2538848	2542862	275429	279308	SPCC613.12c	SPAC140.03	raf1	arb1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.612128592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762337	2538848	2540060	275429	276598	SPCC613.12c	SPBC106.01	raf1	mph1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.956775974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762338	2538848	2541512	275429	278013	SPCC613.12c	SPAC11E3.08c	raf1	nse6	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.68210367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762339	2538848	2543306	275429	279730	SPCC613.12c	SPAC56F8.14c	raf1	mug115	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039308434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762340	2538848	2539452	275429	276015	SPCC613.12c	SPCC70.03c	raf1	SPCC70.03c	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.618500629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762341	2538848	2543287	275429	279712	SPCC613.12c	SPAC9E9.05	raf1	SPAC9E9.05	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.765612934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762342	2538848	2542358	275429	278823	SPCC613.12c	SPAC1782.09c	raf1	clp1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.781941623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762343	2538848	2541650	275429	278146	SPCC613.12c	SPAC14C4.12c	raf1	laf1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.219561042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762344	2538848	2542378	275429	278842	SPCC613.12c	SPAC1805.04	raf1	nup132	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Nup133b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.451264547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762345	2538848	2542237	275429	278709	SPCC613.12c	SPAC19E9.02	raf1	fin1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.15764234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762346	2538848	2541438	275429	277943	SPCC613.12c	SPAC23G3.10c	raf1	ssr3	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632449032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762347	2538848	2541856	275429	278347	SPCC613.12c	SPAC23H3.08c	raf1	bub3	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.587870809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762348	2538848	2541117	275429	277632	SPCC613.12c	SPBC646.13	raf1	sds23	clr8|cmc1|dos1	moc1|psp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.461098451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762349	2538848	2543434	275429	279854	SPCC613.12c	SPAC8F11.02c	raf1	dph3	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.35444914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762350	2538848	2542103	275429	278579	SPCC613.12c	SPAC31G5.11	raf1	pac2	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.144070807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762351	2538848	2540975	275429	277491	SPCC613.12c	SPBC354.12	raf1	gpd3	clr8|cmc1|dos1	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.468022083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762352	2538848	2540979	275429	277495	SPCC613.12c	SPBC3H7.10	raf1	elp6	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.91181671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762353	2538848	2538775	275429	275357	SPCC613.12c	SPCC23B6.05c	raf1	ssb3	clr8|cmc1|dos1	rpa3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.200470602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762354	2538848	2539249	275429	275819	SPCC613.12c	SPCC1450.05c	raf1	rox3	clr8|cmc1|dos1	med19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.713578053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762355	2538848	2540945	275429	277461	SPCC613.12c	SPBC342.06c	raf1	rtt109	clr8|cmc1|dos1	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.202455584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762356	2538848	2540306	275429	276836	SPCC613.12c	SPBC2G5.02c	raf1	ckb2	clr8|cmc1|dos1	SPBC2G5.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.157201553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762357	2538848	2542555	275429	279012	SPCC613.12c	SPAC1952.06c	raf1	SPAC1952.06c	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.304577809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762358	2538848	2540313	275429	276843	SPCC613.12c	SPBC337.04	raf1	ppk27	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635528315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762359	2538848	2540220	275429	276753	SPCC613.12c	SPBC337.03	raf1	rhn1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.34791074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762360	2538848	2541998	275429	278482	SPCC613.12c	SPAC23A1.09	raf1	SPAC23A1.09	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929726302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762361	2538848	2540993	275429	277509	SPCC613.12c	SPBC342.01c	raf1	alg6	clr8|cmc1|dos1	SPBC3F6.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63748805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762362	2538848	2542318	275429	278784	SPCC613.12c	SPAC16C9.05	raf1	cph1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.159395181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762363	2538848	2542277	275429	278746	SPCC613.12c	SPAC17A5.02c	raf1	dbr1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.215108378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762364	2538848	2542180	275429	278655	SPCC613.12c	SPAC589.07c	raf1	atg1801	clr8|cmc1|dos1	atg18|atg18a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.666731616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762365	2538848	2543685	275429	280099	SPCC613.12c	SPAC3C7.03c	raf1	rad55	clr8|cmc1|dos1	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.801321262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762366	2538848	2539823	275429	276373	SPCC613.12c	SPBC16A3.18	raf1	cip1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.213697181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762367	2538848	2539352	275429	275918	SPCC613.12c	SPCC188.07	raf1	ccq1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.409191227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762368	2538848	2538906	275429	275483	SPCC613.12c	SPCC1259.03	raf1	rpa12	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.010786738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762369	2538848	2540825	275429	277343	SPCC613.12c	SPBC428.08c	raf1	clr4	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.057217554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762370	2538848	2541021	275429	277536	SPCC613.12c	SPBC3B8.10c	raf1	nem1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503591595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762371	2538848	2542665	275429	279118	SPCC613.12c	SPAC10F6.08c	raf1	nht10	clr8|cmc1|dos1	nht1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.207949159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762372	2538848	2542568	275429	279024	SPCC613.12c	SPAC1952.02	raf1	tma23	clr8|cmc1|dos1	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.74071294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762373	2538848	2542239	275429	278711	SPCC613.12c	SPAC18G6.02c	raf1	chp1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.768507916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762374	2538848	2539960	275429	276504	SPCC613.12c	SPBC15D4.15	raf1	pho2	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.099868797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762375	2538848	2542036	275429	278518	SPCC613.12c	SPAC23A1.19c	raf1	hrq1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.351606918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762376	2538848	2539098	275429	275670	SPCC613.12c	SPCC24B10.18	raf1	SPCC24B10.18	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.670161547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762377	2538848	2539467	275429	276030	SPCC613.12c	SPCC417.07c	raf1	mto1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.63015855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762378	2538848	2539388	275429	275953	SPCC613.12c	SPCC24B10.12	raf1	cgi121	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.387838197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762379	2538848	2542311	275429	278777	SPCC613.12c	SPAC16A10.05c	raf1	dad1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.556741682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762380	2538848	2543514	275429	279932	SPCC613.12c	SPAC4D7.03	raf1	pop2	clr8|cmc1|dos1	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.43926483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762381	2538848	2539003	275429	275577	SPCC613.12c	SPCC1442.17c	raf1	ist1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	SPCC285.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569604504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762382	2538848	2541801	275429	278292	SPCC613.12c	SPAC2F7.08c	raf1	snf5	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.287377453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762383	2538848	2541545	275429	278045	SPCC613.12c	SPAC22F8.07c	raf1	rtf1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700202341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762384	2538848	2539984	275429	276528	SPCC613.12c	SPBC1289.11	raf1	spf38	clr8|cmc1|dos1	cwf17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.540523764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762385	2538848	2542123	275429	278599	SPCC613.12c	SPAC18G6.15	raf1	mal3	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.707337385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762386	2538848	2538706	275429	275290	SPCC613.12c	SPCC338.08	raf1	ctp1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.209466493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762387	2538848	2542507	275429	278965	SPCC613.12c	SPAC18G6.13	raf1	SPAC18G6.13	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.130287183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762388	2538848	2540352	275429	276881	SPCC613.12c	SPBC215.03c	raf1	csn1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712098523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762389	2538848	2538800	275429	275381	SPCC613.12c	SPCC1322.06	raf1	kap113	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.842996023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762390	2538848	2539073	275429	275645	SPCC613.12c	SPCC1322.02	raf1	pxd1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	SPCC1322.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.896530982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762391	2538848	2543208	275429	279637	SPCC613.12c	SPAC328.04	raf1	SPAC328.04	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507355606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762392	2538848	2541911	275429	278401	SPCC613.12c	SPAC212.04c	raf1	SPAC212.04c	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.46638596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762393	2538848	2543531	275429	279949	SPCC613.12c	SPAC926.06c	raf1	SPAC926.06c	clr8|cmc1|dos1	lrr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.56852255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762394	2538848	2539454	275429	276017	SPCC613.12c	SPCC622.15c	raf1	SPCC622.15c	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.667283112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762395	2538848	2541496	275429	277998	SPCC613.12c	SPAC23D3.09	raf1	arp42	clr8|cmc1|dos1	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.42152725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762396	2538848	2541929	275429	278417	SPCC613.12c	SPAC23C4.12	raf1	hhp2	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934020221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762397	2538848	2543246	275429	279674	SPCC613.12c	SPAPB8E5.05	raf1	mfm1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706972623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762398	2538848	2543118	275429	279550	SPCC613.12c	SPAC3G6.11	raf1	chl1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.293740926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762399	2538848	2539586	275429	276145	SPCC613.12c	SPCC70.08c	raf1	SPCC70.08c	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390821305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762400	2538848	2539284	275429	275852	SPCC613.12c	SPCC584.15c	raf1	SPCC584.15c	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153623578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762401	2538848	2538769	275429	275352	SPCC613.12c	SPCC126.04c	raf1	sgf73	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.283147866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762402	2538848	2542007	275429	278490	SPCC613.12c	SPAC20H4.07	raf1	rad57	clr8|cmc1|dos1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.367133498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762403	2538848	2543244	275429	279672	SPCC613.12c	SPAC6B12.06c	raf1	rrg9	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.561036322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762404	2538848	2538818	275429	275399	SPCC613.12c	SPCC645.12c	raf1	SPCC645.12c	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700113105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762405	2538848	2540961	275429	277477	SPCC613.12c	SPBC36B7.03	raf1	sec63	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.205157931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762406	2538848	2543392	275429	279814	SPCC613.12c	SPAC8F11.03	raf1	msh3	clr8|cmc1|dos1	swi4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.350203302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762407	2538848	2541248	275429	277762	SPCC613.12c	SPBC8D2.10c	raf1	rmt3	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.435798773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762408	2538848	2539232	275429	275802	SPCC613.12c	SPCC1223.04c	raf1	set11	clr8|cmc1|dos1	mug76	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978767125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762409	2538848	2543378	275429	279800	SPCC613.12c	SPAC3H8.07c	raf1	pac10	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.630723003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762410	2538848	2539481	275429	276044	SPCC613.12c	SPCC622.16c	raf1	epe1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	kdm2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.368980252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762411	2538848	2539027	275429	275600	SPCC613.12c	SPCC1322.08	raf1	srk1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	mkp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.480529288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762412	2538848	2541009	275429	277524	SPCC613.12c	SPBC428.04	raf1	apq12	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.909698796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762413	2538848	2539215	275429	275785	SPCC613.12c	SPCC285.16c	raf1	msh6	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.306329066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762414	2538848	2542056	275429	278535	SPCC613.12c	SPAC6G9.14	raf1	SPAC6G9.14	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.095647537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762415	2538848	2541389	275429	277900	SPCC613.12c	SPBPB2B2.09c	raf1	SPBPB2B2.09c	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.803188939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762416	2538848	2541959	275429	278446	SPCC613.12c	SPAC23C4.03	raf1	hrk1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.95553969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762417	2538848	2541053	275429	277568	SPCC613.12c	SPBC56F2.10c	raf1	alg5	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.772453685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762418	2538848	2539303	275429	275871	SPCC613.12c	SPCC1020.09	raf1	gnr1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.446969341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762419	2538848	2541266	275429	277780	SPCC613.12c	SPBP16F5.05c	raf1	yar1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	SPBP16F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.751953707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762420	2538848	2541614	275429	278111	SPCC613.12c	SPAC29A4.20	raf1	elp3	clr8|cmc1|dos1	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.791119872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762421	2538848	2541565	275429	278063	SPCC613.12c	SPAC1250.03	raf1	ubc14	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.370257698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762422	2538848	2538690	275429	275275	SPCC613.12c	SPCC1393.05	raf1	ers1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.414334644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762423	2538848	2542255	275429	278725	SPCC613.12c	SPAC57A7.08	raf1	pzh1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.983808273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762424	2538848	2539993	275429	276537	SPCC613.12c	SPBC1105.05	raf1	exg1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.267751516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762425	2538848	2539812	275429	276362	SPCC613.12c	SPBC1347.02	raf1	fkbp39	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.989230395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762426	2538848	2540193	275429	276726	SPCC613.12c	SPBC1289.10c	raf1	adn2	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.479272106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762427	2538848	2541378	275429	277889	SPCC613.12c	SPBP8B7.21	raf1	ubp3	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.896988213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762428	2538848	2540589	275429	277115	SPCC613.12c	SPBC20F10.06	raf1	mad2	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.237019435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762429	2538848	2540691	275429	277216	SPCC613.12c	SPBC20F10.05	raf1	nrl1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.205547438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762430	2538848	2541017	275429	277532	SPCC613.12c	SPBC36.07	raf1	elp1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.906709068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762431	2538848	2542869	275429	279314	SPCC613.12c	SPAC140.02	raf1	gar2	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.130347012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762432	2538848	2541628	275429	278124	SPCC613.12c	SPAC110.02	raf1	pds5	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.632466814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762433	2538848	2540821	275429	277339	SPCC613.12c	SPBC800.03	raf1	clr3	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.019871065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762434	2538848	2539908	275429	276454	SPCC613.12c	SPBC13E7.06	raf1	msd1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.223253058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762435	2538848	2542198	275429	278673	SPCC613.12c	SPAC6F12.09	raf1	rdp1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	rdr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.721645513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762436	2538848	2541786	275429	278278	SPCC613.12c	SPAC22F3.08c	raf1	rok1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.589651493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762437	2538848	2539354	275429	275920	SPCC613.12c	SPCC4F11.03c	raf1	SPCC4F11.03c	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.40848762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762438	2538848	2541287	275429	277800	SPCC613.12c	SPBP22H7.05c	raf1	abo2	clr8|cmc1|dos1	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.742839002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762439	2538848	2542516	275429	278974	SPCC613.12c	SPAC2F7.04	raf1	pmc2	clr8|cmc1|dos1	med1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.801683038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762440	2538848	2543619	275429	280033	SPCC613.12c	SPAC4F10.04	raf1	ypa1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.33699078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762441	2538848	2539555	275429	276116	SPCC613.12c	SPCC4B3.08	raf1	lsg1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.135589075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762442	2538848	2543670	275429	280084	SPCC613.12c	SPAPB1E7.06c	raf1	eme1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.880061989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762443	2538848	2543567	275429	279983	SPCC613.12c	SPAC890.03	raf1	ppk16	clr8|cmc1|dos1	mug92	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.399695958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762444	2538848	2540498	275429	277026	SPCC613.12c	SPBC27.02c	raf1	ask1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.617340857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762445	2538848	2543662	275429	280076	SPCC613.12c	SPAC9.07c	raf1	SPAC9.07c	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.816737259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762446	2538848	2541470	275429	277972	SPCC613.12c	SPAPYUG7.04c	raf1	rpb9	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.083743516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762447	2538848	2540699	275429	277223	SPCC613.12c	SPBC800.08	raf1	gcd10	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579029269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762448	2538848	2542418	275429	278881	SPCC613.12c	SPAC1805.07c	raf1	dad2	clr8|cmc1|dos1	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.376597678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762449	2538848	2540677	275429	277202	SPCC613.12c	SPBC21B10.03c	raf1	ath1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.151604623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762450	2538848	2542826	275429	279273	SPCC613.12c	SPAC13G6.09	raf1	SPAC13G6.09	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.510998226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762451	2538848	2539668	275429	276223	SPCC613.12c	SPBC11B10.10c	raf1	pht1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.397301716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762452	2538848	2541789	275429	278281	SPCC613.12c	SPAC23H4.08	raf1	iwr1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.302219792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762453	2538848	2543672	275429	280086	SPCC613.12c	SPAC4H3.01	raf1	SPAC4H3.01	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864215691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762454	2538848	2540555	275429	277082	SPCC613.12c	SPBP16F5.02	raf1	mcs2	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.853557166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762455	2538848	2543633	275429	280047	SPCC613.12c	SPAC3H8.05c	raf1	mms1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512589107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762456	2538848	2540936	275429	277452	SPCC613.12c	SPBC800.05c	raf1	atb2	clr8|cmc1|dos1	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.084176877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762457	2538848	2539920	275429	276464	SPCC613.12c	SPBC119.08	raf1	pmk1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	spm1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.901134948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762458	2538848	2540896	275429	277412	SPCC613.12c	SPBC19C2.13c	raf1	ctu2	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381030761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762459	2538848	2543380	275429	279802	SPCC613.12c	SPAC4G9.16c	raf1	rpl901	clr8|cmc1|dos1	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.070671992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762460	2538848	2541941	275429	278428	SPCC613.12c	SPAC20H4.03c	raf1	tfs1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.302544094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762461	2538848	2543513	275429	279931	SPCC613.12c	SPAC821.06	raf1	spn2	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.34672257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762462	2538848	2543384	275429	279806	SPCC613.12c	SPAC637.06	raf1	gmh5	clr8|cmc1|dos1	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.565740855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762463	2538848	2539181	275429	275752	SPCC613.12c	SPCC622.14	raf1	SPCC622.14	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451531003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762464	2538848	2543387	275429	279809	SPCC613.12c	SPAPB1E7.02c	raf1	mcl1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.211477569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762465	2538848	2540173	275429	276706	SPCC613.12c	SPBC106.13	raf1	SPBC106.13	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931452044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762466	2538848	2541472	275429	277974	SPCC613.12c	SPAC589.11	raf1	pth4	clr8|cmc1|dos1	mug82	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451982927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762467	2538848	2543087	275429	279520	SPCC613.12c	SPAC30C2.04	raf1	SPAC30C2.04	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.438026872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762468	2538848	2542175	275429	278650	SPCC613.12c	SPAC1F3.02c	raf1	mkh1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.752704492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762469	2538848	2540314	275429	276844	SPCC613.12c	SPBC2G5.03	raf1	ctu1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.878850035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762470	2538848	2542566	275429	279022	SPCC613.12c	SPAC8C9.12c	raf1	SPAC8C9.12c	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.266738396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762471	2538848	2539583	275429	276142	SPCC613.12c	SPCC777.04	raf1	SPCC777.04	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702162412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762472	2538848	2541491	275429	277993	SPCC613.12c	SPAC2C4.16c	raf1	rps801	clr8|cmc1|dos1	rps8|rps8-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.434577903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762473	2538848	2543372	275429	279794	SPCC613.12c	SPAPB1A10.09	raf1	ase1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.56728803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762474	2538848	2542890	275429	279334	SPCC613.12c	SPAC13G6.14	raf1	aps1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	SPAC24B11.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.328732544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762475	2538848	2543100	275429	279532	SPCC613.12c	SPAC12B10.14c	raf1	tea5	clr8|cmc1|dos1	ppk2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779521868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762476	2538848	2540309	275429	276839	SPCC613.12c	SPBC21B10.13c	raf1	yox1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633452398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762477	2538848	2543646	275429	280060	SPCC613.12c	SPAC821.07c	raf1	moc3	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807646119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762478	2538848	2541062	275429	277577	SPCC613.12c	SPBC660.11	raf1	tcg1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505258965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762479	2538848	2541875	275429	278365	SPCC613.12c	SPAC22F3.06c	raf1	lon1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.127064428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762480	2543432	2540279	279852	276810	SPAC4G8.05	SPBC3B8.04c	ppk14	SPBC3B8.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.984826414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762481	2543432	2538796	279852	275377	SPAC4G8.05	SPCC63.06	ppk14	SPCC63.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.477038917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762482	2543432	2539405	279852	275970	SPAC4G8.05	SPCC553.03	ppk14	pex1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.378443897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762483	2543432	2542291	279852	278759	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC17C9.08	ppk14	pnu1	-	end1|nuc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.983869004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762484	2543432	2539156	279852	275728	SPAC4G8.05	SPCC1450.08c	ppk14	wtf16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387942479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762485	2543432	2542197	279852	278672	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC1142.01	ppk14	rqc1	-	SPAC1142.01|SPAC17G6.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.548280817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762486	2543432	2541552	279852	278051	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC1142.08	ppk14	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.372040323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762487	2543432	2539301	279852	275869	SPAC4G8.05	SPCC622.03c	ppk14	SPCC622.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256971439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762488	2543432	2543578	279852	279993	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC9.10	ppk14	thi9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.562559194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762489	2543432	2543559	279852	279975	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC664.04c	ppk14	rps1602	-	rps16|rps16-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913227398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762490	2543432	2540474	279852	277002	SPAC4G8.05	SPBC26H8.09c	ppk14	snf59	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.151866409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762491	2543432	2538922	279852	275499	SPAC4G8.05	SPCC16C4.10	ppk14	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5792329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762492	2543432	2540491	279852	277019	SPAC4G8.05	SPBC28E12.04	ppk14	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381987625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762493	2543432	2540535	279852	277062	SPAC4G8.05	SPBC215.01	ppk14	SPBC215.01	-	SPBC3B9.20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.067756318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762494	2543432	2538976	279852	275550	SPAC4G8.05	SPCC1840.04	ppk14	pca1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.842778305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762495	2543432	3361570	279852	280646	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC750.01	ppk14	SPAC750.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391775009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762496	2543432	2543230	279852	279658	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC823.13c	ppk14	SPAC823.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.894131588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762497	2543432	2539249	279852	275819	SPAC4G8.05	SPCC1450.05c	ppk14	rox3	-	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.433165969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762498	2543432	2543383	279852	279805	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC869.08	ppk14	pcm2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57997358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762499	2543432	2539117	279852	275689	SPAC4G8.05	SPCC74.06	ppk14	mak3	-	phk2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.445816204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762500	2543432	2539575	279852	276135	SPAC4G8.05	SPCP20C8.02c	ppk14	SPCP20C8.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094897774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762501	2543432	2539302	279852	275870	SPAC4G8.05	SPCC126.09	ppk14	zip2	-	SPCC126.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.625429145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762502	2543432	2542022	279852	278505	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC23A1.03	ppk14	apt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.078785593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762503	2543432	2542023	279852	278506	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC20H4.10	ppk14	ufd2	-	SPAC145.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.401443339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762504	2543432	2541311	279852	277823	SPAC4G8.05	SPBP8B7.09c	ppk14	los1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776529826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762505	2543432	2543108	279852	279540	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC3A12.13c	ppk14	SPAC3A12.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.743921638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762506	2543432	2543292	279852	279717	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC6C3.02c	ppk14	SPAC6C3.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.261850274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762507	2543432	2542554	279852	279011	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC1952.03	ppk14	otu2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325382357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762508	2543432	2543651	279852	280065	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC644.11c	ppk14	pkp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035515028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762509	2543432	2542311	279852	278777	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC16A10.05c	ppk14	dad1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.168986044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762510	2543432	2539051	279852	275624	SPAC4G8.05	SPCC1183.11	ppk14	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319628699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762511	2543432	2541741	279852	278235	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC20G4.02c	ppk14	fus1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.615666211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762512	2543432	2541042	279852	277557	SPAC4G8.05	SPBC359.03c	ppk14	aat1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575022169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762513	2543432	2538715	279852	275299	SPAC4G8.05	SPCC1223.05c	ppk14	rpl3702	-	rpl37|rpl37-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700802375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762514	2543432	2541264	279852	277778	SPAC4G8.05	SPBC902.06	ppk14	mto2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842050028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762515	2543432	2541545	279852	278045	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC22F8.07c	ppk14	rtf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.259435844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762516	2543432	2540647	279852	277172	SPAC4G8.05	SPBC18H10.07	ppk14	SPBC18H10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.389097814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762517	2543432	2539984	279852	276528	SPAC4G8.05	SPBC1289.11	ppk14	spf38	-	cwf17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.43701813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762518	2543432	2542699	279852	279152	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC5H10.07	ppk14	SPAC5H10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44012521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762519	2543432	2541543	279852	278043	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC5H10.04	ppk14	SPAC5H10.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.548458961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762520	2543432	2542168	279852	278643	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC17A5.16	ppk14	ftp105	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6183441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762521	2543432	2541876	279852	278366	SPAC4G8.05	SPAP27G11.11c	ppk14	SPAP27G11.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.508123204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762522	2543432	2542428	279852	278890	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC1805.12c	ppk14	uep1	-	ubi2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.810968577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762523	2543432	2543363	279852	279785	SPAC4G8.05	SPAPB24D3.09c	ppk14	pdr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633678429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762524	2543432	2543246	279852	279674	SPAC4G8.05	SPAPB8E5.05	ppk14	mfm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776055697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762525	2543432	2541352	279852	277863	SPAC4G8.05	SPBPJ4664.03	ppk14	mfm3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444838731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762526	2543432	2541310	279852	277822	SPAC4G8.05	SPBP18G5.03	ppk14	toc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.473570704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762527	2543432	2543101	279852	279533	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC323.03c	ppk14	SPAC323.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.442085977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762528	2543432	2541532	279852	278032	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC2C4.15c	ppk14	ubx2	-	ucp13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.984197488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762529	2543432	2540665	279852	277190	SPAC4G8.05	SPBC83.02c	ppk14	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.901110444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762530	2543432	2540261	279852	276792	SPAC4G8.05	SPBC543.05c	ppk14	SPBC543.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.841894494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762531	2543432	2539482	279852	276045	SPAC4G8.05	SPCC417.06c	ppk14	mug27	-	ppk35|slk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.851942665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762532	2543432	2541248	279852	277762	SPAC4G8.05	SPBC8D2.10c	ppk14	rmt3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.059026001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762533	2543432	2542549	279852	279006	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC19A8.11c	ppk14	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987808356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762534	2543432	2541009	279852	277524	SPAC4G8.05	SPBC428.04	ppk14	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.988442442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762535	2543432	2539348	279852	275914	SPAC4G8.05	SPCC18B5.07c	ppk14	nup61	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.014268333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762536	2543432	2539740	279852	276292	SPAC4G8.05	SPBC1685.04	ppk14	SPBC1685.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.253142269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762537	2543432	2540201	279852	276734	SPAC4G8.05	SPBC13A2.04c	ppk14	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385146511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762538	2543432	2540180	279852	276713	SPAC4G8.05	SPBC16D10.11c	ppk14	rps1801	-	rps18-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.887989174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762539	2543432	2543517	279852	279935	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC3G9.05	ppk14	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.008483164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762540	2543432	2539812	279852	276362	SPAC4G8.05	SPBC1347.02	ppk14	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.516750316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762541	2543432	2541378	279852	277889	SPAC4G8.05	SPBP8B7.21	ppk14	ubp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.800315435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762542	2543432	2542781	279852	279230	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC57A10.12c	ppk14	ura3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638703066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762543	2543432	2539519	279852	276081	SPAC4G8.05	SPCC364.05	ppk14	vps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574058257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762544	2543432	2541742	279852	278236	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC22H10.09	ppk14	SPAC22H10.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.31732686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762545	2543432	2540946	279852	277462	SPAC4G8.05	SPBC36.04	ppk14	cys11	-	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702435509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762546	2543432	2542283	279852	278751	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC27F1.08	ppk14	pdt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.329537158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762547	2543432	2542759	279852	279209	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC9G1.07	ppk14	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.87902993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762548	2543432	2543071	279852	279504	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC3C7.06c	ppk14	pit1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.204643049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762549	2543432	2543670	279852	280084	SPAC4G8.05	SPAPB1E7.06c	ppk14	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.559931413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762550	2543432	2541121	279852	277636	SPAC4G8.05	SPBC609.03	ppk14	iqw1	-	iqwd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.945687145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762551	2543432	2541816	279852	278307	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC22E12.01	ppk14	pet3	-	SPAC22E12.01|SPAC890.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.075380714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762552	2543432	2543662	279852	280076	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC9.07c	ppk14	SPAC9.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323167003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762553	2543432	2541531	279852	278031	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC25A8.01c	ppk14	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.747337109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762554	2543432	2542355	279852	278820	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC29A4.13	ppk14	SPAC29A4.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569263599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762555	2543432	2541678	279852	278174	SPAC4G8.05	SPAP7G5.05	ppk14	rpl1002	-	rpl10|rpl10-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453089775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762556	2543432	2542731	279852	279181	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC5H10.09c	ppk14	SPAC5H10.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634741711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762557	2543432	2538916	279852	275493	SPAC4G8.05	SPCC16C4.17	ppk14	mug123	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.129802585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762558	2543432	2539335	279852	275901	SPAC4G8.05	SPCC1450.16c	ppk14	ptl1	-	SPCC1450.16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.375773622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762559	2543432	2542826	279852	279273	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC13G6.09	ppk14	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.252503028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762560	2543432	2539182	279852	275753	SPAC4G8.05	SPCC16A11.16c	ppk14	rpn1302	-	rpn13|rpn13b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.130822338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762561	2543432	2541773	279852	278267	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC23H4.02	ppk14	ppk9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.370791963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762562	2543432	2542386	279852	278850	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC1805.01c	ppk14	ppk6	-	SPAPJ736.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.986131205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762563	2543432	2542838	279852	279284	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC13G7.11	ppk14	SPAC13G7.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.534645992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762564	2543432	2540489	279852	277017	SPAC4G8.05	SPBC25H2.03	ppk14	SPBC25H2.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924738665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762565	2543432	2539920	279852	276464	SPAC4G8.05	SPBC119.08	ppk14	pmk1	-	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.474411879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762566	2543432	2543525	279852	279943	SPAC4G8.05	SPAC4A8.14	ppk14	SPAC4A8.14	-	prs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.984496926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762567	2543432	2539178	279852	275749	SPAC4G8.05	SPCC1682.14	ppk14	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.804526891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762568	2543432	2541357	279852	277868	SPAC4G8.05	SPBPB7E8.01	ppk14	SPBPB7E8.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.562986479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762569	2543432	3361481	279852	280557	SPAC4G8.05	SPAPB24D3.05c	ppk14	SPAPB24D3.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444970798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762570	2543432	2543374	279852	279796	SPAC4G8.05	SPAPB1A10.08	ppk14	SPAPB1A10.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326849376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762571	2543432	2540787	279852	277306	SPAC4G8.05	SPBC1921.07c	ppk14	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.934727299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762572	2543432	2543660	279852	280074	SPAC4G8.05	SPAPB1E7.08c	ppk14	SPAPB1E7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440894162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762573	2538930	2539774	275506	276325	SPCC188.13c	SPBC17A3.10	dcr1	pas4	SPCC584.10c	pi036	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.758172397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762574	2538930	2538796	275506	275377	SPCC188.13c	SPCC63.06	dcr1	SPCC63.06	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381463351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762575	2538930	2542862	275506	279308	SPCC188.13c	SPAC140.03	dcr1	arb1	SPCC584.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817906873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762576	2538930	2540060	275506	276598	SPCC188.13c	SPBC106.01	dcr1	mph1	SPCC584.10c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.963128436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762577	2538930	2538961	275506	275535	SPCC188.13c	SPCC285.14	dcr1	trs130	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383540654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762578	2538930	2543529	275506	279947	SPCC188.13c	SPAC4C5.02c	dcr1	ryh1	SPCC584.10c	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.163539431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762579	2538930	2542585	275506	279040	SPCC188.13c	SPAC31A2.13c	dcr1	sft1	SPCC584.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929053843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762580	2538930	2542066	275506	278543	SPCC188.13c	SPAC227.05	dcr1	SPAC227.05	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637412991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762581	2538930	2541650	275506	278146	SPCC188.13c	SPAC14C4.12c	dcr1	laf1	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.337014828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762582	2538930	2542378	275506	278842	SPCC188.13c	SPAC1805.04	dcr1	nup132	SPCC584.10c	Nup133b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201635943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762583	2538930	2542237	275506	278709	SPCC188.13c	SPAC19E9.02	dcr1	fin1	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.07373986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762584	2538930	2541130	275506	277645	SPCC188.13c	SPBC776.11	dcr1	rpl2801	SPCC584.10c	rpl28-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.974346018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762585	2538930	2543559	275506	279975	SPCC188.13c	SPAC664.04c	dcr1	rps1602	SPCC584.10c	rps16|rps16-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.857107614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762586	2538930	2542443	275506	278905	SPCC188.13c	SPAC17G6.13	dcr1	slt1	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.267976541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762587	2538930	2541856	275506	278347	SPCC188.13c	SPAC23H3.08c	dcr1	bub3	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.985881579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762588	2538930	2539350	275506	275916	SPCC188.13c	SPCC24B10.17	dcr1	emp24	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.244488983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762589	2538930	2541117	275506	277632	SPCC188.13c	SPBC646.13	dcr1	sds23	SPCC584.10c	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507682299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762590	2538930	2540694	275506	277218	SPCC188.13c	SPBC19C7.10	dcr1	bqt4	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.043937158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762591	2538930	2539208	275506	275778	SPCC188.13c	SPCC1450.11c	dcr1	cek1	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.120855564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762592	2538930	2539226	275506	275796	SPCC188.13c	SPCC16C4.20c	dcr1	SPCC16C4.20c	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638642905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762593	2538930	2540975	275506	277491	SPCC188.13c	SPBC354.12	dcr1	gpd3	SPCC584.10c	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.214168098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762594	2538930	2539420	275506	275985	SPCC188.13c	SPCC970.07c	dcr1	raf2	SPCC584.10c	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.76878699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762595	2538930	2541200	275506	277714	SPCC188.13c	SPBC8D2.03c	dcr1	hhf2	SPCC584.10c	ams3|h4.2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04189942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762596	2538930	2542468	275506	278929	SPCC188.13c	SPAC1D4.09c	dcr1	rtf2	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.632693798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762597	2538930	2542669	275506	279122	SPCC188.13c	SPAC29B12.08	dcr1	clr5	SPCC584.10c	SPAC29B12.08	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.975456285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762598	2538930	2540945	275506	277461	SPCC188.13c	SPBC342.06c	dcr1	rtt109	SPCC584.10c	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.715493146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762599	2538930	2539331	275506	275897	SPCC188.13c	SPCC24B10.09	dcr1	rps1702	SPCC584.10c	rps17|rps17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.040602684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762600	2538930	2540727	275506	277250	SPCC188.13c	SPBC1921.03c	dcr1	mex67	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.99915474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762601	2538930	2542022	275506	278505	SPCC188.13c	SPAC23A1.03	dcr1	apt1	SPCC584.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094176064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762602	2538930	2542277	275506	278746	SPCC188.13c	SPAC17A5.02c	dcr1	dbr1	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.93017512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762603	2538930	2543110	275506	279542	SPCC188.13c	SPAC56E4.06c	dcr1	ggt2	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.393365414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762604	2538930	2541580	275506	278077	SPCC188.13c	SPAC1687.05	dcr1	pli1	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.565320837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762605	2538930	2543296	275506	279721	SPCC188.13c	SPAC9E9.03	dcr1	leu2	SPCC584.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.879891794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762606	2538930	2541522	275506	278023	SPCC188.13c	SPAC23E2.01	dcr1	fep1	SPCC584.10c	gaf2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.188219175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762607	2538930	2543426	275506	279846	SPCC188.13c	SPAC631.02	dcr1	bdf2	SPCC584.10c	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.499660603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762608	2538930	2538972	275506	275546	SPCC188.13c	SPCC1739.15	dcr1	wtf21	SPCC584.10c	wtf3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.420469739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762609	2538930	2542845	275506	279291	SPCC188.13c	SPAC824.04	dcr1	SPAC824.04	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.178854084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762610	2538930	2540825	275506	277343	SPCC188.13c	SPBC428.08c	dcr1	clr4	SPCC584.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.087395408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762611	2538930	2541021	275506	277536	SPCC188.13c	SPBC3B8.10c	dcr1	nem1	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637753984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762612	2538930	2542554	275506	279011	SPCC188.13c	SPAC1952.03	dcr1	otu2	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.196944604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762613	2538930	2542568	275506	279024	SPCC188.13c	SPAC1952.02	dcr1	tma23	SPCC584.10c	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.809184068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762614	2538930	2539098	275506	275670	SPCC188.13c	SPCC24B10.18	dcr1	SPCC24B10.18	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.015104271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762615	2538930	2542177	275506	278652	SPCC188.13c	SPAC17H9.08	dcr1	SPAC17H9.08	SPCC584.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.141650699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762616	2538930	2539003	275506	275577	SPCC188.13c	SPCC1442.17c	dcr1	ist1	SPCC584.10c	SPCC285.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.11728656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762617	2538930	2542652	275506	279106	SPCC188.13c	SPAC1687.15	dcr1	gsk3	SPCC584.10c	skp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.330261029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762618	2538930	2542123	275506	278599	SPCC188.13c	SPAC18G6.15	dcr1	mal3	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.901673175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762619	2538930	2543412	275506	279834	SPCC188.13c	SPAC637.07	dcr1	moe1	SPCC584.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201208188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762620	2538930	2540396	275506	276924	SPCC188.13c	SPBC31F10.12	dcr1	tma20	SPCC584.10c	SPBC31F10.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877517148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762621	2538930	2540150	275506	276687	SPCC188.13c	SPBC16E9.14c	dcr1	zrg17	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.410754605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762622	2538930	2540403	275506	276931	SPCC188.13c	SPBC21D10.11c	dcr1	nfs1	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.524071962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762623	2538930	2539484	275506	276047	SPCC188.13c	SPCC594.04c	dcr1	SPCC594.04c	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.820352667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762624	2538930	2542357	275506	278822	SPCC188.13c	SPAC1782.07	dcr1	qcr8	SPCC584.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.50449221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762625	2538930	2543118	275506	279550	SPCC188.13c	SPAC3G6.11	dcr1	chl1	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.011586474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762626	2538930	2541983	275506	278468	SPCC188.13c	SPAC20G8.08c	dcr1	fft1	SPCC584.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980002711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762627	2538930	2538837	275506	275418	SPCC188.13c	SPCC4B3.03c	dcr1	SPCC4B3.03c	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454205374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762628	2538930	2539974	275506	276518	SPCC188.13c	SPBC32H8.07	dcr1	git5	SPCC584.10c	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.130906861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762629	2538930	2540836	275506	277354	SPCC188.13c	SPBC18H10.19	dcr1	vps38	SPCC584.10c	atg14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199408736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762630	2538930	2540077	275506	276615	SPCC188.13c	SPBC17D11.04c	dcr1	nto1	SPCC584.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.197621357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762631	2538930	2543378	275506	279800	SPCC188.13c	SPAC3H8.07c	dcr1	pac10	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.375071892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762632	2538930	2542519	275506	278977	SPCC188.13c	SPAC19G12.08	dcr1	scs7	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.631924255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762633	2538930	2541009	275506	277524	SPCC188.13c	SPBC428.04	dcr1	apq12	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.518219891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762634	2538930	2538780	275506	275361	SPCC188.13c	SPCC1840.07c	dcr1	SPCC1840.07c	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.462980496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762635	2538930	2540967	275506	277483	SPCC188.13c	SPBC36B7.08c	dcr1	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC584.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.100295095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762636	2538930	2541266	275506	277780	SPCC188.13c	SPBP16F5.05c	dcr1	yar1	SPCC584.10c	SPBP16F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575227966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762637	2538930	2539213	275506	275783	SPCC188.13c	SPCC285.10c	dcr1	SPCC285.10c	SPCC584.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.414046401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762638	2538930	2539812	275506	276362	SPCC188.13c	SPBC1347.02	dcr1	fkbp39	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.548056138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762639	2538930	2543515	275506	279933	SPCC188.13c	SPAC4F10.14c	dcr1	btf3	SPCC584.10c	btt1|egd1|nac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.867632801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762640	2538930	2540930	275506	277446	SPCC188.13c	SPBC354.10	dcr1	def1	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.057995911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762641	2538930	2541963	275506	278449	SPCC188.13c	SPAC21E11.04	dcr1	aca1	SPCC584.10c	ppr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.939810749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762642	2538930	2538848	275506	275429	SPCC188.13c	SPCC613.12c	dcr1	raf1	SPCC584.10c	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.821405623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762643	2538930	2541896	275506	278386	SPCC188.13c	SPAC23H4.16c	dcr1	SPAC23H4.16c	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775738007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762644	2538930	2541144	275506	277659	SPCC188.13c	SPBC685.06	dcr1	rps001	SPCC584.10c	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.524327321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762645	2538930	2542170	275506	278645	SPCC188.13c	SPAC17G8.13c	dcr1	mst2	SPCC584.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870662491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762646	2538930	2541786	275506	278278	SPCC188.13c	SPAC22F3.08c	dcr1	rok1	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701271906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762647	2538930	2541798	275506	278289	SPCC188.13c	SPAC22F3.03c	dcr1	rdh54	SPCC584.10c	mug34|tid1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868907924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762648	2538930	2542759	275506	279209	SPCC188.13c	SPAC9G1.07	dcr1	SPAC9G1.07	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570765809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762649	2538930	2542769	275506	279219	SPCC188.13c	SPAC15A10.10	dcr1	mde6	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.188585908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762650	2538930	2541287	275506	277800	SPCC188.13c	SPBP22H7.05c	dcr1	abo2	SPCC584.10c	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579209579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762651	2538930	2542516	275506	278974	SPCC188.13c	SPAC2F7.04	dcr1	pmc2	SPCC584.10c	med1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.209058596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762652	2538930	2543096	275506	279528	SPCC188.13c	SPAC977.05c	dcr1	SPAC977.05c	SPCC584.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.338348807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762653	2538930	2541470	275506	277972	SPCC188.13c	SPAPYUG7.04c	dcr1	rpb9	SPCC584.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.709900746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762654	2538930	2540677	275506	277202	SPCC188.13c	SPBC21B10.03c	dcr1	ath1	SPCC584.10c	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.083884528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762655	2538930	2539335	275506	275901	SPCC188.13c	SPCC1450.16c	dcr1	ptl1	SPCC584.10c	SPCC1450.16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329832931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762656	2538930	2541789	275506	278281	SPCC188.13c	SPAC23H4.08	dcr1	iwr1	SPCC584.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.80152277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762657	2538930	2540936	275506	277452	SPCC188.13c	SPBC800.05c	dcr1	atb2	SPCC584.10c	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.25669328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762658	2538930	2539170	275506	275741	SPCC188.13c	SPCC306.02c	dcr1	SPCC306.02c	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.560815581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762659	2538930	3361511	275506	280587	SPCC188.13c	SPAC23C4.08	dcr1	rho3	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387896436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762660	2538930	2539189	275506	275760	SPCC188.13c	SPCC1682.16	dcr1	rpt4	SPCC584.10c	SPCC306.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990277447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762661	2538930	2541941	275506	278428	SPCC188.13c	SPAC20H4.03c	dcr1	tfs1	SPCC584.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.618790401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762662	2538930	2543337	275506	279760	SPCC188.13c	SPAC959.08	dcr1	rpl2102	SPCC584.10c	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.813445841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762663	2538930	2538792	275506	275373	SPCC188.13c	SPCP1E11.10	dcr1	SPCP1E11.10	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.810828374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762664	2538930	2539700	275506	276253	SPCC188.13c	SPBC1685.15c	dcr1	klp6	SPCC584.10c	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.082255916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762665	2538930	2543327	275506	279750	SPCC188.13c	SPAC1D4.06c	dcr1	csk1	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329417286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762666	2538930	2543471	275506	279891	SPCC188.13c	SPAC513.07	dcr1	SPAC513.07	SPCC584.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096804383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762667	2538930	2541466	275506	277968	SPCC188.13c	SPAC14C4.06c	dcr1	nab2	SPCC584.10c	SPAC14C4.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.99932569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762668	2538930	2543076	275506	279509	SPCC188.13c	SPAC30C2.07	dcr1	SPAC30C2.07	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579456572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762669	2538930	2542175	275506	278650	SPCC188.13c	SPAC1F3.02c	dcr1	mkh1	SPCC584.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.503767542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762670	2538930	2542424	275506	278886	SPCC188.13c	SPAC1805.14	dcr1	SPAC1805.14	SPCC584.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.821105474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762671	2538930	2539085	275506	275657	SPCC188.13c	SPCC285.15c	dcr1	rps2802	SPCC584.10c	rps28|rps28-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.274727959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762672	2538930	2541491	275506	277993	SPCC188.13c	SPAC2C4.16c	dcr1	rps801	SPCC584.10c	rps8|rps8-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.050158445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762673	2538930	2543372	275506	279794	SPCC188.13c	SPAPB1A10.09	dcr1	ase1	SPCC584.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.474787464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762674	2538930	2543090	275506	279523	SPCC188.13c	SPBC1348.01	dcr1	SPBC1348.01	SPCC584.10c	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64242105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762675	2538930	2543646	275506	280060	SPCC188.13c	SPAC821.07c	dcr1	moc3	SPCC584.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.138988314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762676	2540967	2540060	277483	276598	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC106.01	SPBC36B7.08c	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.24923132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762677	2540967	2538961	277483	275535	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC285.14	SPBC36B7.08c	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.884548235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762678	2540967	2542080	277483	278557	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC27D7.03c	SPBC36B7.08c	mei2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.339126427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762679	2540967	2541512	277483	278013	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC11E3.08c	SPBC36B7.08c	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.12704368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762680	2540967	2540913	277483	277429	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.290478108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762681	2540967	2543152	277483	279584	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC869.03c	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC869.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.052908711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762682	2540967	2543414	277483	279836	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC630.10	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC630.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.343273034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762683	2540967	2543524	277483	279942	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC4D7.07c	SPBC36B7.08c	csi2	-	SPAC4D7.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444785415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762684	2540967	2542237	277483	278709	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC36B7.08c	fin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.560581672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762685	2540967	3361561	277483	280637	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC36B7.08c	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.461615185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762686	2540967	2541856	277483	278347	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC23H3.08c	SPBC36B7.08c	bub3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.311909576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762687	2540967	2542701	277483	279154	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC36B7.08c	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.431930103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762688	2540967	2538922	277483	275499	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.546299581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762689	2540967	2539309	277483	275876	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC4G3.19	SPBC36B7.08c	alp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.741138623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762690	2540967	2539420	277483	275985	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC970.07c	SPBC36B7.08c	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.44637175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762691	2540967	2541200	277483	277714	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC8D2.03c	SPBC36B7.08c	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.66308484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762692	2540967	2542468	277483	278929	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC1D4.09c	SPBC36B7.08c	rtf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.403427117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762693	2540967	2542677	277483	279130	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC36B7.08c	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.401026255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762694	2540967	2540979	277483	277495	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC3H7.10	SPBC36B7.08c	elp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321729419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762695	2540967	2542273	277483	278742	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0462134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762696	2540967	2539564	277483	276125	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC550.12	SPBC36B7.08c	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.072115537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762697	2540967	2539463	277483	276026	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC550.11	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC550.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.943780253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762698	2540967	2538801	277483	275382	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC285.13c	SPBC36B7.08c	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.777274303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762699	2540967	2539434	277483	275997	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC757.09c	SPBC36B7.08c	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.55908895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762700	2540967	2541026	277483	277541	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC337.09	SPBC36B7.08c	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.817566244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762701	2540967	2540929	277483	277445	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC354.03	SPBC36B7.08c	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.297112404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762702	2540967	2541346	277483	277857	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC36B7.08c	ppm1	-	SPBP8B7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.987800636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762703	2540967	2540463	277483	276991	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC2F12.15c	SPBC36B7.08c	pfa3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.432670325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762704	2540967	2540425	277483	276953	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC27.06c	SPBC36B7.08c	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.329493512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762705	2540967	2542318	277483	278784	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC36B7.08c	cph1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.861323544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762706	2540967	2540595	277483	277121	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC21C3.02c	SPBC36B7.08c	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.304437292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762707	2540967	2539244	277483	275814	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC1672.06c	SPBC36B7.08c	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.929447755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762708	2540967	2539820	277483	276370	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC1709.13c	SPBC36B7.08c	set10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.820297655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762709	2540967	2541004	277483	277519	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC3F6.01c	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC3F6.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.431734032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762710	2540967	2543426	277483	279846	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC631.02	SPBC36B7.08c	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.722071698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762711	2540967	2538906	277483	275483	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC1259.03	SPBC36B7.08c	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.832236194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762712	2540967	2539310	277483	275877	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC285.17	SPBC36B7.08c	spp27	-	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.62736199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762713	2540967	2539023	277483	275596	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC594.05c	SPBC36B7.08c	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.103176567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762714	2540967	2542311	277483	278777	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC36B7.08c	dad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.143892361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762715	2540967	2542646	277483	279100	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC11H11.05c	SPBC36B7.08c	fta6	-	sma6	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.600060664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762716	2540967	2541776	277483	278270	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC36B7.08c	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.58087255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762717	2540967	2542463	277483	278924	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC1834.03c	SPBC36B7.08c	hhf1	-	h4.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.471886659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762718	2540967	2541889	277483	278379	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC36B7.08c	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.542915857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762719	2540967	2541496	277483	277998	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC36B7.08c	arp42	-	arp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462843308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762720	2540967	2543667	277483	280081	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC4H3.02c	SPBC36B7.08c	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.009924156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762721	2540967	2540452	277483	276980	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC2A9.11c	SPBC36B7.08c	iss9	-	SPBC2A9.11c|SPBC2D10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.91221051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762722	2540967	2543643	277483	280057	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC36B7.08c	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.373854207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762723	2540967	2541899	277483	278389	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC36B7.08c	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.847752511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762724	2540967	2541710	277483	278205	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC343.11c	SPBC36B7.08c	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.030360976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762725	2540967	2539667	277483	276222	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC36B7.08c	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.898935474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762726	2540967	2542126	277483	278602	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC36B7.08c	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507374861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762727	2540967	2540077	277483	276615	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC17D11.04c	SPBC36B7.08c	nto1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.355256261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762728	2540967	2539232	277483	275802	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC1223.04c	SPBC36B7.08c	set11	-	mug76	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.165615166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762729	2540967	2539408	277483	275973	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC576.12c	SPBC36B7.08c	mhf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321547662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762730	2540967	2543443	277483	279863	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC3H1.12c	SPBC36B7.08c	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.803650042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762731	2540967	2539348	277483	275914	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC18B5.07c	SPBC36B7.08c	nup61	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.249939188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762732	2540967	3361470	277483	280546	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC3G9.01	SPBC36B7.08c	nsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.43647358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762733	2540967	2541614	277483	278111	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC36B7.08c	elp3	-	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.422622051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762734	2540967	2541565	277483	278063	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC1250.03	SPBC36B7.08c	ubc14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.860196471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762735	2540967	2540229	277483	276761	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC31F10.15c	SPBC36B7.08c	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.4388562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762736	2540967	2541746	277483	278240	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC36B7.08c	hus1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.940312369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762737	2540967	2541337	277483	277848	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBP35G2.13c	SPBC36B7.08c	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.413339329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762738	2540967	3361520	277483	280596	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC1610.02c	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.63818726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762739	2540967	2541017	277483	277532	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC36.07	SPBC36B7.08c	elp1	-	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.268609201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762740	2540967	2539538	277483	276100	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC364.06	SPBC36B7.08c	nap1	-	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.781574938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762741	2540967	2539499	277483	276062	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC622.08c	SPBC36B7.08c	hta1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978622213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762742	2540967	2538762	277483	275345	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC306.04c	SPBC36B7.08c	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.035824768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762743	2540967	2541175	277483	277689	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC839.13c	SPBC36B7.08c	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.901983504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762744	2540967	2543106	277483	279538	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC3A11.13	-	SPAC3H5.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.879174189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762745	2540967	2540498	277483	277026	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC27.02c	SPBC36B7.08c	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.637643073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762746	2540967	2542883	277483	279328	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC36B7.08c	alm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770131801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762747	2540967	2538966	277483	275540	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC18.10	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.289431793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762748	2540967	2540531	277483	277059	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC23E6.08	SPBC36B7.08c	sat1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.18837897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762749	2540967	2541103	277483	277618	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC651.06	SPBC36B7.08c	mug166	-	csa1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818277209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762750	2540967	2541531	277483	278031	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC36B7.08c	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.274460184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762751	2540967	2541470	277483	277972	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC36B7.08c	rpb9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.967671842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762752	2540967	2540829	277483	277347	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC800.09	SPBC36B7.08c	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632195677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762753	2540967	2542418	277483	278881	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC36B7.08c	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.32876178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762754	2540967	2539668	277483	276223	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC36B7.08c	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.713058719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762755	2540967	2541789	277483	278281	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC36B7.08c	iwr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.735872701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762756	2540967	2540146	277483	276683	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.443158659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762757	2540967	2539700	277483	276253	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC36B7.08c	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.076580034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762758	2540967	2540409	277483	276937	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC2D10.11c	SPBC36B7.08c	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.950898663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762759	2540967	2542460	277483	278921	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC1F12.03c	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC1F12.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.192733194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762760	2540967	2542094	277483	278571	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC36B7.08c	rcd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319236049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762761	2540347	2539930	276876	276474	SPBC30B4.08	SPBC1198.11c	eri1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.190561192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762762	2540347	3361561	276876	280637	SPBC30B4.08	SPAC11E3.01c	eri1	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.30630129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762763	2540347	2542701	276876	279154	SPBC30B4.08	SPAC26H5.05	eri1	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.831066285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762764	2540347	2540664	276876	277189	SPBC30B4.08	SPBC215.02	eri1	bob1	-	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039758109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762765	2540347	2542277	276876	278746	SPBC30B4.08	SPAC17A5.02c	eri1	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.648973273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762766	2540347	2542845	276876	279291	SPBC30B4.08	SPAC824.04	eri1	SPAC824.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387826988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762767	2540347	2542568	276876	279024	SPBC30B4.08	SPAC1952.02	eri1	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.564156059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762768	2540347	2539733	276876	276285	SPBC30B4.08	SPBC16E9.12c	eri1	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.548856449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762769	2540347	2543667	276876	280081	SPBC30B4.08	SPAC4H3.02c	eri1	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.886739205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762770	2540347	2543643	276876	280057	SPBC30B4.08	SPAC3G9.07c	eri1	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.212401223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762771	2540347	2541899	276876	278389	SPBC30B4.08	SPAC22E12.11c	eri1	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.429466725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762772	2540347	2541710	276876	278205	SPBC30B4.08	SPAC343.11c	eri1	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.664219649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762773	2540347	2539667	276876	276222	SPBC30B4.08	SPBC13G1.08c	eri1	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.067471927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762774	2540347	2543443	276876	279863	SPBC30B4.08	SPAC3H1.12c	eri1	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.330446843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762775	2540347	2539538	276876	276100	SPBC30B4.08	SPCC364.06	eri1	nap1	-	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.989491621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762776	2540347	2543304	276876	279728	SPBC30B4.08	SPAC6B12.12	eri1	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.01581468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762777	2540347	2538966	276876	275540	SPBC30B4.08	SPCC18.10	eri1	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.685795705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762778	2540347	2541531	276876	278031	SPBC30B4.08	SPAC25A8.01c	eri1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.678628263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762779	2541589	2542492	278086	278951	SPAC1556.03	SPAC1B9.02c	azr1	sck1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.127446513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762780	2541589	2542168	278086	278643	SPAC1556.03	SPAC17A5.16	azr1	ftp105	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389589064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762781	2541589	2540699	278086	277223	SPAC1556.03	SPBC800.08	azr1	gcd10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.952599362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762782	2541589	2539170	278086	275741	SPAC1556.03	SPCC306.02c	azr1	SPCC306.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979202217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762783	2541589	2541806	278086	278297	SPAC1556.03	SPAC4G8.13c	azr1	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.048024392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762784	2540588	2542867	277114	279312	SPBC21B10.12	SPAC343.16	rec6	lys2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.768177492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762785	2540588	2540229	277114	276761	SPBC21B10.12	SPBC31F10.15c	rec6	atp15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813144599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762786	2540588	2543472	277114	279892	SPBC21B10.12	SPAC959.04c	rec6	omh6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982336906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762787	2541733	2543529	278227	279947	SPAC27F1.03c	SPAC4C5.02c	uch1	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.327779928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762788	2541733	2541426	278227	277931	SPAC27F1.03c	SPAC227.06	uch1	SPAC227.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507741915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762789	2541733	2541552	278227	278051	SPAC27F1.03c	SPAC1142.08	uch1	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.307592249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762790	2541733	2539420	278227	275985	SPAC27F1.03c	SPCC970.07c	uch1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.845041637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762791	2541733	2542023	278227	278506	SPAC27F1.03c	SPAC20H4.10	uch1	ufd2	-	SPAC145.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.083995914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762792	2541733	2542791	278227	279240	SPAC27F1.03c	SPAC167.04	uch1	pam17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.155297861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762793	2541733	2540673	278227	277198	SPAC27F1.03c	SPBC1D7.03	uch1	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.620518627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762794	2541733	2540150	278227	276687	SPAC27F1.03c	SPBC16E9.14c	uch1	zrg17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762795	2541733	2542160	278227	278636	SPAC27F1.03c	SPAC8C9.11	uch1	fra2	-	SPAC8C9.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3794543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762796	2541733	2542860	278227	279306	SPAC27F1.03c	SPAC8C9.09c	uch1	mug129	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638643552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762797	2541733	2539815	278227	276365	SPAC27F1.03c	SPBC1105.02c	uch1	lys4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711305471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762798	2541733	2542437	278227	278899	SPAC27F1.03c	SPAC17A5.01	uch1	pex6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.260290531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762799	2541733	2542597	278227	279051	SPAC27F1.03c	SPAP8A3.07c	uch1	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979921856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762800	2541733	2538762	278227	275345	SPAC27F1.03c	SPCC306.04c	uch1	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.800733015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762801	2541733	2539101	278227	275673	SPAC27F1.03c	SPCC736.04c	uch1	gma12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.941111567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762802	2541733	2540800	278227	277319	SPAC27F1.03c	SPBC409.20c	uch1	psh3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148265178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762803	2541733	2540936	278227	277452	SPAC27F1.03c	SPBC800.05c	uch1	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98840735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762804	2541733	2542716	278227	279169	SPAC27F1.03c	SPAC25H1.07	uch1	emc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.99049399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762805	2541733	2541806	278227	278297	SPAC27F1.03c	SPAC4G8.13c	uch1	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.773630204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762806	2542636	2539050	279090	275623	SPAP27G11.13c	SPCC11E10.08	nop10	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.927232952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762807	2542636	2542577	279090	279033	SPAP27G11.13c	SPAC19G12.15c	nop10	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.134042047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762808	2542636	2540105	279090	276642	SPAP27G11.13c	SPBC106.04	nop10	ada1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871125131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762809	2542636	2542598	279090	279052	SPAP27G11.13c	SPAC6G10.08	nop10	idp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.698565578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762810	2542636	2540474	279090	277002	SPAP27G11.13c	SPBC26H8.09c	nop10	snf59	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816126898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762811	2542636	2543434	279090	279854	SPAP27G11.13c	SPAC8F11.02c	nop10	dph3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.044250553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762812	2542636	2540455	279090	276983	SPAP27G11.13c	SPBC215.05	nop10	gpd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6447059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762813	2542636	2541208	279090	277722	SPAP27G11.13c	SPBC887.04c	nop10	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.591188587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762814	2542636	2542689	279090	279142	SPAP27G11.13c	SPAC29B12.04	nop10	snz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095052916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762815	2542636	2543453	279090	279873	SPAP27G11.13c	SPAC3G9.03	nop10	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86370155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762816	2542636	2541026	279090	277541	SPAP27G11.13c	SPBC337.09	nop10	erg28	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876443852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762817	2542636	2540425	279090	276953	SPAP27G11.13c	SPBC27.06c	nop10	mgr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.825513855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762818	2542636	2540851	279090	277368	SPAP27G11.13c	SPBC4F6.04	nop10	rpl2502	-	rpl23a-2|rpl25b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.419329799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762819	2542636	2540595	279090	277121	SPAP27G11.13c	SPBC21C3.02c	nop10	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.610579969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762820	2542636	2543584	279090	279999	SPAP27G11.13c	SPAPB1E7.11c	nop10	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.197909451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762821	2542636	2542568	279090	279024	SPAP27G11.13c	SPAC1952.02	nop10	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.691289283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762822	2542636	2540797	279090	277316	SPAP27G11.13c	SPBC18H10.11c	nop10	ppr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098184686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762823	2542636	2541801	279090	278292	SPAP27G11.13c	SPAC2F7.08c	nop10	snf5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.570437546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762824	2542636	2542652	279090	279106	SPAP27G11.13c	SPAC1687.15	nop10	gsk3	-	skp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.108618862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762825	2542636	2540546	279090	277073	SPAP27G11.13c	SPBC25B2.06c	nop10	btb2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439606441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762826	2542636	2540396	279090	276924	SPAP27G11.13c	SPBC31F10.12	nop10	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.268799372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762827	2542636	2542983	279090	279421	SPAP27G11.13c	SPAC11D3.15	nop10	SPAC11D3.15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81986364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762828	2542636	2541735	279090	278229	SPAP27G11.13c	SPAC7D4.04	nop10	atg11	-	taf1|cvt9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.499238219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762829	2542636	2541578	279090	278075	SPAP27G11.13c	SPAC25B8.05	nop10	deg1	-	SPAC25B8.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.863034231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762830	2542636	2539999	279090	276543	SPAP27G11.13c	SPBC1734.15	nop10	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640548844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762831	2542636	2541496	279090	277998	SPAP27G11.13c	SPAC23D3.09	nop10	arp42	-	arp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.332453706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762832	2542636	2541183	279090	277697	SPAP27G11.13c	SPBC725.14	nop10	arg6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.864875958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762833	2542636	2542032	279090	278514	SPAP27G11.13c	SPAC23C11.04c	nop10	pnk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.843411335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762834	2542636	2540997	279090	277513	SPAP27G11.13c	SPBC3H7.06c	nop10	pof9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.760465529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762835	2542636	2540318	279090	276848	SPAP27G11.13c	SPBC30B4.04c	nop10	sol1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.411887815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762836	2542636	2542712	279090	279165	SPAP27G11.13c	SPAC25B8.17	nop10	SPAC25B8.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.193291564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762837	2542636	5802861	279090	857999	SPAP27G11.13c	SPAC1D4.01	nop10	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.999264258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762838	2542636	2540335	279090	276865	SPAP27G11.13c	SPBC30B4.03c	nop10	adn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.313125878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762839	2542636	2539847	279090	276395	SPAP27G11.13c	SPBC530.14c	nop10	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573195406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762840	2542636	2540599	279090	277125	SPAP27G11.13c	SPBC29A3.10c	nop10	atp14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986406993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762841	2542636	2541266	279090	277780	SPAP27G11.13c	SPBP16F5.05c	nop10	yar1	-	SPBP16F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.942264779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762842	2542636	2542829	279090	279276	SPAP27G11.13c	SPAC13D6.02c	nop10	byr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.766478506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762843	2542636	2541488	279090	277990	SPAP27G11.13c	SPAC227.17c	nop10	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.071586844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762844	2542636	2541337	279090	277848	SPAP27G11.13c	SPBP35G2.13c	nop10	swc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.822090782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762845	2542636	2542973	279090	279412	SPAP27G11.13c	SPAC10F6.04	nop10	SPAC10F6.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.838308289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762846	2542636	2539354	279090	275920	SPAP27G11.13c	SPCC4F11.03c	nop10	SPCC4F11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.93121502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762847	2542636	2542327	279090	278793	SPAP27G11.13c	SPAC16C9.06c	nop10	upf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.884476011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762848	2542636	2542883	279090	279328	SPAP27G11.13c	SPAC1486.04c	nop10	alm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.309508981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762849	2542636	2543304	279090	279728	SPAP27G11.13c	SPAC6B12.12	nop10	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.867748423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762850	2542636	2542940	279090	279381	SPAP27G11.13c	SPAC31A2.12	nop10	SPAC31A2.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.437287987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762851	2542636	2540531	279090	277059	SPAP27G11.13c	SPBC23E6.08	nop10	sat1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.629732664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762852	2542636	2540346	279090	276875	SPAP27G11.13c	SPBC2F12.03c	nop10	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.708844581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762853	2542636	2539375	279090	275941	SPAP27G11.13c	SPCC4G3.11	nop10	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641988141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762854	2542636	2538861	279090	275441	SPAP27G11.13c	SPCC1620.11	nop10	nup97	-	mug87	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632447089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762855	2542636	2543684	279090	280098	SPAP27G11.13c	SPAC4G8.03c	nop10	SPAC4G8.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.312525617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762856	2542636	2538869	279090	275449	SPAP27G11.13c	SPCC777.02	nop10	SPCC777.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638295509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762857	2542636	2542424	279090	278886	SPAP27G11.13c	SPAC1805.14	nop10	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929526665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762858	2542636	2541491	279090	277993	SPAP27G11.13c	SPAC2C4.16c	nop10	rps801	-	rps8|rps8-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.100925845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762859	2542636	2543448	279090	279868	SPAP27G11.13c	SPAC3H5.07	nop10	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09870549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762860	2542636	2542094	279090	278571	SPAP27G11.13c	SPAC29B12.06c	nop10	rcd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.463523777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762861	2542636	2542908	279090	279352	SPAP27G11.13c	SPAC13G7.03	nop10	upf3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.103390542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762862	2542636	2540649	279090	277174	SPAP27G11.13c	SPBC19F8.08	nop10	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.858747189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762863	2543452	2541475	279872	277977	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC24B11.09	ssu72	mpc2	-	SPAC24B11.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.371430749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762864	2543452	2539841	279872	276389	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC17D1.05	ssu72	SPBC17D1.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.914076706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762865	2543452	2540105	279872	276642	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC106.04	ssu72	ada1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.111483271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762866	2543452	2543529	279872	279947	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC4C5.02c	ssu72	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.629940322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762867	2543452	2539405	279872	275970	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC553.03	ssu72	pex1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.974256545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762868	2543452	2542518	279872	278976	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC1B3.16c	ssu72	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.188500185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762869	2543452	2541512	279872	278013	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC11E3.08c	ssu72	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.88418064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762870	2543452	2540913	279872	277429	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC56F2.08c	ssu72	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325289947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762871	2543452	2538993	279872	275567	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC162.12	ssu72	tco89	-	SPCC1753.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.566927114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762872	2543452	2538896	279872	275474	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC584.11c	ssu72	SPCC584.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709581949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762873	2543452	2539930	279872	276474	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC1198.11c	ssu72	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.037744994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762874	2543452	2539951	279872	276495	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC11B10.05c	ssu72	rsp1	-	pi006|SPACTOKYO_453.30c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.587477915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762875	2543452	3361561	279872	280637	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC11E3.01c	ssu72	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.822848773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762876	2543452	2541345	279872	277856	SPAC3G9.04	SPBP35G2.07	ssu72	ilv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330525154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762877	2543452	2541681	279872	278177	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC14C4.01c	ssu72	SPAC14C4.01c	-	SPAC19D5.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.993882511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762878	2543452	2540347	279872	276876	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC30B4.08	ssu72	eri1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.295403229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762879	2543452	2541082	279872	277597	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC577.11	ssu72	SPBC577.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776907347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762880	2543452	2540975	279872	277491	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC354.12	ssu72	gpd3	-	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994308208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762881	2543452	2542816	279872	279263	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC4G8.11c	ssu72	atp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632121864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762882	2543452	2539564	279872	276125	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC550.12	ssu72	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.158828803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762883	2543452	2539235	279872	275805	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC1682.15	ssu72	mug122	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.186949967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762884	2543452	2543681	279872	280095	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC9.02c	ssu72	SPAC9.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.326562015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762885	2543452	2539434	279872	275997	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC757.09c	ssu72	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.497805546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762886	2543452	2541026	279872	277541	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC337.09	ssu72	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702512777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762887	2543452	2540220	279872	276753	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC337.03	ssu72	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.348250464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762888	2543452	2539797	279872	276347	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC16G5.14c	ssu72	rps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707456566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762889	2543452	2542012	279872	278495	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC23C11.02c	ssu72	rps23	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.762467292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762890	2543452	2541530	279872	278030	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC57A10.10c	ssu72	sla1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328059864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762891	2543452	2542022	279872	278505	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC23A1.03	ssu72	apt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.262837653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762892	2543452	2540425	279872	276953	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC27.06c	ssu72	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.498306009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762893	2543452	2542969	279872	279409	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC4G8.10	ssu72	gos1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.922065907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762894	2543452	2542277	279872	278746	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC17A5.02c	ssu72	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.659979499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762895	2543452	2540595	279872	277121	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC21C3.02c	ssu72	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.239453603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762896	2543452	2539244	279872	275814	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC1672.06c	ssu72	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.875587349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762897	2543452	2543563	279872	279979	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC664.02c	ssu72	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.411449907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762898	2543452	2543426	279872	279846	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC631.02	ssu72	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.521360712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762899	2543452	2538906	279872	275483	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC1259.03	ssu72	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.991280692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762900	2543452	2542253	279872	278723	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC17H9.04c	ssu72	SPAC17H9.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573587599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762901	2543452	2542845	279872	279291	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC824.04	ssu72	SPAC824.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.63013466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762902	2543452	2542981	279872	279419	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC824.02	ssu72	bst1	-	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.436424962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762903	2543452	3361543	279872	280619	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC9.13c	ssu72	cwf16	-	SPAPJ735.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.893035067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762904	2543452	2541021	279872	277536	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC3B8.10c	ssu72	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.566272195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762905	2543452	2540964	279872	277480	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC365.16	ssu72	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.746969036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762906	2543452	2539310	279872	275877	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC285.17	ssu72	spp27	-	uaf30	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045152613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762907	2543452	2542665	279872	279118	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC10F6.08c	ssu72	nht10	-	nht1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.429832352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762908	2543452	2539467	279872	276030	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC417.07c	ssu72	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.186477259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762909	2543452	2539388	279872	275953	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC24B10.12	ssu72	cgi121	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.344853372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762910	2543452	2539051	279872	275624	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC1183.11	ssu72	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.565831025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762911	2543452	2542950	279872	279390	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC12B10.03	ssu72	bun62	-	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322957929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762912	2543452	2540892	279872	277408	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC530.01	ssu72	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.931886609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762913	2543452	2542544	279872	279001	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC18G6.10	ssu72	lem2	-	heh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388517217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762914	2543452	2543412	279872	279834	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC637.07	ssu72	moe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.534065645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762915	2543452	2539733	279872	276285	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC16E9.12c	ssu72	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.886280387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762916	2543452	2541876	279872	278366	SPAC3G9.04	SPAP27G11.11c	ssu72	SPAP27G11.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.424359003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762917	2543452	2542235	279872	278707	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC18G6.05c	ssu72	SPAC18G6.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320019442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762918	2543452	2541496	279872	277998	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC23D3.09	ssu72	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.846292142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762919	2543452	2539603	279872	276161	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC1289.06c	ssu72	ppr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.905859031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762920	2543452	2542357	279872	278822	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC1782.07	ssu72	qcr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444872052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762921	2543452	2541899	279872	278389	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC22E12.11c	ssu72	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.215554335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762922	2543452	2540086	279872	276624	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC16H5.12c	ssu72	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.801443229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762923	2543452	2542857	279872	279303	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC144.06	ssu72	apl5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.197536562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762924	2543452	2541710	279872	278205	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC343.11c	ssu72	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.988480578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762925	2543452	2539667	279872	276222	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC13G1.08c	ssu72	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.696990297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762926	2543452	2542032	279872	278514	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC23C11.04c	ssu72	pnk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.136688813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762927	2543452	2542976	279872	279414	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC9E9.09c	ssu72	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.132096226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762928	2543452	2541900	279872	278390	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC23H4.17c	ssu72	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097064454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762929	2543452	2539408	279872	275973	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC576.12c	ssu72	mhf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.938643445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762930	2543452	2539953	279872	276497	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC1709.11c	ssu72	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.667025237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762931	2543452	2543443	279872	279863	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC3H1.12c	ssu72	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.777816665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762932	2543452	2541708	279872	278203	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC31A2.02	ssu72	trm112	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.849597489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762933	2543452	2540599	279872	277125	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC29A3.10c	ssu72	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707419809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762934	2543452	2543315	279872	279739	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC6B12.07c	ssu72	SPAC6B12.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515101443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762935	2543452	2541186	279872	277700	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC725.01	ssu72	SPBC725.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.328715747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762936	2543452	2541927	279872	278415	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC222.12c	ssu72	atp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.922610575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762937	2543452	2541337	279872	277848	SPAC3G9.04	SPBP35G2.13c	ssu72	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.882408722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762938	2543452	2543254	279872	279682	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC1006.03c	ssu72	red1	-	iss3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.342890297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762939	2543452	3361520	279872	280596	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC1610.02c	ssu72	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.841964342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762940	2543452	2539763	279872	276314	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC1861.05	ssu72	SPBC1861.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.993403721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762941	2543452	2540001	279872	276545	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC1289.13c	ssu72	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.613535821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762942	2543452	2542516	279872	278974	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC2F7.04	ssu72	pmc2	-	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.510626934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762943	2543452	2543619	279872	280033	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC4F10.04	ssu72	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931378367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762944	2543452	2539555	279872	276116	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC4B3.08	ssu72	lsg1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.664516462	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762945	2543452	2540061	279872	276599	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC119.12	ssu72	rud3	-	SPBC119.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.697412958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762946	2543452	2539137	279872	275709	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC1682.08c	ssu72	mcp2	-	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387434129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762947	2543452	2541909	279872	278399	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC227.01c	ssu72	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.620420794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762948	2543452	2542881	279872	279326	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC13F5.03c	ssu72	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.212754186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762949	2543452	2539159	279872	275731	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC1235.01	ssu72	SPCC1235.01	-	SPCC320.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.509572143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762950	2543452	2541531	279872	278031	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC25A8.01c	ssu72	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.623363974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762951	2543452	2539013	279872	275586	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC364.03	ssu72	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387376435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762952	2543452	2541470	279872	277972	SPAC3G9.04	SPAPYUG7.04c	ssu72	rpb9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.500631036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762953	2543452	2539359	279872	275925	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC16C4.06c	ssu72	pus3	-	SPCC16C4.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.852419626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762954	2543452	2540699	279872	277223	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC800.08	ssu72	gcd10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.496489987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762955	2543452	2543437	279872	279857	SPAC3G9.04	SPAPB1A10.14	ssu72	pof15	-	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980408824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762956	2543452	2542826	279872	279273	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC13G6.09	ssu72	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.292214431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762957	2543452	2539668	279872	276223	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC11B10.10c	ssu72	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.646456473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762958	2543452	2541404	279872	277913	SPAC3G9.04	SPBPB2B2.18	ssu72	SPBPB2B2.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.342280353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762959	2543452	2539928	279872	276472	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC1604.08c	ssu72	imp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.317509775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762960	2543452	2539189	279872	275760	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC1682.16	ssu72	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.457464135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762961	2543452	2538792	279872	275373	SPAC3G9.04	SPCP1E11.10	ssu72	SPCP1E11.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.186097639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762962	2543452	2539169	279872	275740	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC1235.11	ssu72	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.993416302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762963	2543452	2543220	279872	279648	SPAC3G9.04	SPAPB21F2.02	ssu72	SPAPB21F2.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638838263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762964	2543452	2538854	279872	275435	SPAC3G9.04	SPCP1E11.05c	ssu72	are2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.058045307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762965	2543452	2541478	279872	277980	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC2F7.17	ssu72	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.628041787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762966	2543452	2543372	279872	279794	SPAC3G9.04	SPAPB1A10.09	ssu72	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.319572479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762967	2543452	2540309	279872	276839	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC21B10.13c	ssu72	yox1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987823258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762968	2543452	2541124	279872	277639	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC646.02	ssu72	cwf11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.979332929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762969	2543452	2541272	279872	277786	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC947.03c	ssu72	naa38	-	mak31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778297339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762970	2543452	2542094	279872	278571	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC29B12.06c	ssu72	rcd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709798473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762971	2543452	2540208	279872	276741	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC9B6.03	ssu72	SPBC9B6.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.443460051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762972	2543452	2541062	279872	277577	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC660.11	ssu72	tcg1	-	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440655927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762973	2543452	2542879	279872	279324	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC13G7.07	ssu72	arb2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.210388547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762974	2543517	2542207	279935	278682	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC17H9.10c	spa2	ddb1	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444384875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762975	2543517	2542577	279935	279033	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC19G12.15c	spa2	tpp1	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.448689885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762976	2543517	2542143	279935	278619	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC17C9.07	spa2	alg8	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.118431603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762977	2543517	2543064	279935	279497	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC3G6.01	spa2	hrp3	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.941826592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762978	2543517	2542293	279935	278761	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC17G8.14c	spa2	pck1	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC22H10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.073546555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762979	2543517	2540068	279935	276606	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC1734.12c	spa2	alg12	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.878251485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762980	2543517	2541117	279935	277632	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC646.13	spa2	sds23	SPAC3G9.05	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.322939771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762981	2543517	2543432	279935	279852	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC4G8.05	spa2	ppk14	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.008483164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762982	2543517	2539332	279935	275898	SPAC3G9.05	SPCPB1C11.01	spa2	amt1	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.58125995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762983	2543517	2540975	279935	277491	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC354.12	spa2	gpd3	SPAC3G9.05	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511150396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762984	2543517	2543681	279935	280095	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC9.02c	spa2	SPAC9.02c	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.91344842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762985	2543517	2540919	279935	277435	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC543.07	spa2	pek1	SPAC3G9.05	mkk1|skh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.249793376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762986	2543517	2539434	279935	275997	SPAC3G9.05	SPCC757.09c	spa2	rnc1	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.061718382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762987	2543517	2540993	279935	277509	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC342.01c	spa2	alg6	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC3F6.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.91219772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762988	2543517	2542277	279935	278746	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC17A5.02c	spa2	dbr1	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980115516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762989	2543517	2543563	279935	279979	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC664.02c	spa2	arp8	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.746568541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762990	2543517	2538927	279935	275503	SPAC3G9.05	SPCC1795.09	spa2	yps1	SPAC3G9.05	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87362174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762991	2543517	2541021	279935	277536	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC3B8.10c	spa2	nem1	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.749367258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762992	2543517	2542331	279935	278797	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC1834.05	spa2	alg9	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.476798752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762993	2543517	2542036	279935	278518	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC23A1.19c	spa2	hrq1	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.345559383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762994	2543517	2542177	279935	278652	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC17H9.08	spa2	SPAC17H9.08	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.875498732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762995	2543517	2540797	279935	277316	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC18H10.11c	spa2	ppr2	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.815805349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762996	2543517	2541801	279935	278292	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC2F7.08c	spa2	snf5	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578420199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762997	2543517	2542513	279935	278971	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC1952.05	spa2	gcn5	SPAC3G9.05	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.309496215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762998	2543517	2540348	279935	276877	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC29A10.05	spa2	exo1	SPAC3G9.05	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.435458026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
762999	2543517	2543412	279935	279834	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC637.07	spa2	moe1	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57772702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763000	2543517	2540673	279935	277198	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC1D7.03	spa2	mug80	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.129687589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763001	2543517	2543638	279935	280052	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC3H8.09c	spa2	nab3	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.547356215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763002	2543517	2542227	279935	278700	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC5H10.13c	spa2	gmh2	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712455177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763003	2543517	2541496	279935	277998	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC23D3.09	spa2	arp42	SPAC3G9.05	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.698710648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763004	2543517	2543245	279935	279673	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC56F8.06c	spa2	alg10	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.382859253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763005	2543517	2539857	279935	276404	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC1604.20c	spa2	tea2	SPAC3G9.05	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.902430443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763006	2543517	2540326	279935	276856	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC2G5.06c	spa2	hmt2	SPAC3G9.05	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.631545946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763007	2543517	2539667	279935	276222	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC13G1.08c	spa2	ash2	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.44149689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763008	2543517	2541607	279935	278104	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC24B11.10c	spa2	cfh1	SPAC3G9.05	chr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.810414839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763009	2543517	2539974	279935	276518	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC32H8.07	spa2	git5	SPAC3G9.05	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512060009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763010	2543517	2542439	279935	278901	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC17A5.08	spa2	erp2	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.868904565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763011	2543517	2540019	279935	276563	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC1685.01	spa2	pmp1	SPAC3G9.05	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.478433102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763012	2543517	2541053	279935	277568	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC56F2.10c	spa2	alg5	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.127042126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763013	2543517	2541680	279935	278176	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC22F8.09	spa2	rrp16	SPAC3G9.05	nop53	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864360213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763014	2543517	2540229	279935	276761	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC31F10.15c	spa2	atp15	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330288238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763015	2543517	2541488	279935	277990	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC227.17c	spa2	SPAC227.17c	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576293686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763016	2543517	2539877	279935	276423	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC16G5.07c	spa2	SPBC16G5.07c	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.806562937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763017	2543517	2542283	279935	278751	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC27F1.08	spa2	pdt1	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.692846166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763018	2543517	2539160	279935	275732	SPAC3G9.05	SPCC18.17c	spa2	SPCC18.17c	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.249039952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763019	2543517	2541909	279935	278399	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC227.01c	spa2	erd1	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517962878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763020	2543517	2542881	279935	279326	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC13F5.03c	spa2	gld1	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320061003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763021	2543517	2542940	279935	279381	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC31A2.12	spa2	SPAC31A2.12	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32926045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763022	2543517	2541100	279935	277615	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC651.04	spa2	SPBC651.04	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.774544383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763023	2543517	2543192	279935	279621	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC343.18	spa2	rfp2	SPAC3G9.05	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981730906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763024	2543517	2541367	279935	277878	SPAC3G9.05	SPBP8B7.13	spa2	vac7	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.316415224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763025	2543517	2541531	279935	278031	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC25A8.01c	spa2	fft3	SPAC3G9.05	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447317852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763026	2543517	2538916	279935	275493	SPAC3G9.05	SPCC16C4.17	spa2	mug123	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.678393728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763027	2543517	2543427	279935	279847	SPAC3G9.05	SPAPB1A10.15	spa2	arv1	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582058186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763028	2543517	2540202	279935	276735	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC16G5.09	spa2	SPBC16G5.09	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.922365045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763029	2543517	2541744	279935	278238	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC23A1.02c	spa2	SPAC23A1.02c	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701904643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763030	2543517	2539928	279935	276472	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC1604.08c	spa2	imp1	SPAC3G9.05	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.559392228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763031	2543517	2539205	279935	275775	SPAC3G9.05	SPCC4B3.15	spa2	mid1	SPAC3G9.05	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.141072777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763032	2543517	2543384	279935	279806	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC637.06	spa2	gmh5	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.291279264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763033	2543517	2540383	279935	276912	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC31E1.02c	spa2	pmr1	SPAC3G9.05	cps5|pgak2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512685585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763034	2543517	2542617	279935	279071	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC13A11.01c	spa2	rga8	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.236032249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763035	3361470	2541512	280546	278013	SPAC3G9.01	SPAC11E3.08c	nsk1	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.070388768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763036	3361470	3361561	280546	280637	SPAC3G9.01	SPAC11E3.01c	nsk1	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.521407861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763037	3361470	2542701	280546	279154	SPAC3G9.01	SPAC26H5.05	nsk1	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.943449064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763038	3361470	2541208	280546	277722	SPAC3G9.01	SPBC887.04c	nsk1	lub1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.031334133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763039	3361470	2541926	280546	278414	SPAC3G9.01	SPAC222.14c	nsk1	SPAC222.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.79241419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763040	3361470	2542036	280546	278518	SPAC3G9.01	SPAC23A1.19c	nsk1	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.397512535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763041	3361470	2542861	280546	279307	SPAC3G9.01	SPAC13G7.13c	nsk1	msa1	-	SPAC6C3.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.43717973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763042	3361470	2542126	280546	278602	SPAC3G9.01	SPAC1B3.05	nsk1	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.147344782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763043	3361470	2540967	280546	277483	SPAC3G9.01	SPBC36B7.08c	nsk1	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.43647358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763044	3361470	2540589	280546	277115	SPAC3G9.01	SPBC20F10.06	nsk1	mad2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.899297374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763045	3361470	2541372	280546	277883	SPAC3G9.01	SPBP8B7.28c	nsk1	stc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38794945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763046	3361470	2541531	280546	278031	SPAC3G9.01	SPAC25A8.01c	nsk1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.577724339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763047	3361470	2543372	280546	279794	SPAC3G9.01	SPAPB1A10.09	nsk1	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.562044129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763048	2538948	2539165	275522	275736	SPCC1020.07	SPCC1281.04	SPCC1020.07	SPCC1281.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.080313893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763049	2538948	2541323	275522	277835	SPCC1020.07	SPBP35G2.14	SPCC1020.07	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633956256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763050	2538948	2540893	275522	277409	SPCC1020.07	SPBC543.10	SPCC1020.07	get1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.058782163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763051	2538948	2540396	275522	276924	SPCC1020.07	SPBC31F10.12	SPCC1020.07	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449819526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763052	2538948	2540831	275522	277349	SPCC1020.07	SPBC428.02c	SPCC1020.07	eca39	-	SPBC582.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922595376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763053	2538948	2540086	275522	276624	SPCC1020.07	SPBC16H5.12c	SPCC1020.07	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568874377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763054	2538948	2539667	275522	276222	SPCC1020.07	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC1020.07	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569871727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763055	2538948	2538774	275522	275356	SPCC1020.07	SPCC162.06c	SPCC1020.07	SPCC162.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714041786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763056	2538948	2540232	275522	276764	SPCC1020.07	SPBC336.10c	SPCC1020.07	tif512	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097530093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763057	2538948	2541142	275522	277657	SPCC1020.07	SPBC725.04	SPCC1020.07	SPBC725.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931683678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763058	2538948	2541479	275522	277981	SPCC1020.07	SPAC27F1.06c	SPCC1020.07	SPAC27F1.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933836603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763059	2538948	2541266	275522	277780	SPCC1020.07	SPBP16F5.05c	SPCC1020.07	yar1	-	SPBP16F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45015229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763060	2538948	2540229	275522	276761	SPCC1020.07	SPBC31F10.15c	SPCC1020.07	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.070747605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763061	2538948	2541432	275522	277937	SPCC1020.07	SPAC1F5.05c	SPCC1020.07	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581228938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763062	2538948	2539029	275522	275602	SPCC1020.07	SPCC61.05	SPCC1020.07	SPCC61.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330661936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763063	2538948	3361165	275522	280241	SPCC1020.07	SPBC1348.12	SPCC1020.07	SPBC1348.12	-	SPAC1348.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044237995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763064	2538948	2541478	275522	277980	SPCC1020.07	SPAC2F7.17	SPCC1020.07	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.028293819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763065	2538828	2542207	275409	278682	SPCC1020.05	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC1020.05	ddb1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.206714667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763066	2538828	2540999	275409	277515	SPCC1020.05	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC1020.05	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.901670166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763067	2538828	2538801	275409	275382	SPCC1020.05	SPCC285.13c	SPCC1020.05	nup60	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.245310197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763068	2538828	2540425	275409	276953	SPCC1020.05	SPBC27.06c	SPCC1020.05	mgr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812131274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763069	2538828	2542318	275409	278784	SPCC1020.05	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC1020.05	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.736000241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763070	2538828	2541643	275409	278139	SPCC1020.05	SPAC14C4.13	SPCC1020.05	rad17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.932176034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763071	2538828	2539845	275409	276393	SPCC1020.05	SPBC12C2.02c	SPCC1020.05	ste20	-	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442680744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763072	2538828	2542007	275409	278490	SPCC1020.05	SPAC20H4.07	SPCC1020.05	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.900395308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763073	2538828	2540992	275409	277508	SPCC1020.05	SPBC342.05	SPCC1020.05	crb2	-	rhp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.39820522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763074	2538828	2541744	275409	278238	SPCC1020.05	SPAC23A1.02c	SPCC1020.05	SPAC23A1.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.72475081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763075	2538828	2542440	275409	278902	SPCC1020.05	SPAC17A2.12	SPCC1020.05	rrp1	-	SPAC17A2.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781633333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763076	2538828	2542094	275409	278571	SPCC1020.05	SPAC29B12.06c	SPCC1020.05	rcd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.351884245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763077	2541339	2542435	277850	278897	SPBP4G3.02	SPAC1805.16c	pho1	SPAC1805.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987421432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763078	2541339	2539930	277850	276474	SPBP4G3.02	SPBC1198.11c	pho1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.936154336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763079	2541339	2542318	277850	278784	SPBP4G3.02	SPAC16C9.05	pho1	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.969029445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763080	2541339	2541911	277850	278401	SPBP4G3.02	SPAC212.04c	pho1	SPAC212.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450414428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763081	2541339	2542710	277850	279163	SPBP4G3.02	SPAC750.08c	pho1	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.317454345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763082	2541339	2542597	277850	279051	SPBP4G3.02	SPAP8A3.07c	pho1	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876600006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763083	2541339	2541488	277850	277990	SPBP4G3.02	SPAC227.17c	pho1	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152842686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763084	2541339	2541628	277850	278124	SPBP4G3.02	SPAC110.02	pho1	pds5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037781953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763085	2541339	2542943	277850	279384	SPBP4G3.02	SPBC1348.03	pho1	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.645279437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763086	2541339	2538730	277850	275314	SPBP4G3.02	SPCC31H12.02c	pho1	mug73	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.517659075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763087	2541529	2541512	278029	278013	SPAC1687.13c	SPAC11E3.08c	csn5	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258338243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763088	2541529	2540425	278029	276953	SPAC1687.13c	SPBC27.06c	csn5	mgr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930750287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763089	2541529	2542177	278029	278652	SPAC1687.13c	SPAC17H9.08	csn5	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986371428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763090	2541529	2541720	278029	278214	SPAC1687.13c	SPAC23H3.13c	csn5	gpa2	-	git8	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812639367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763091	2541529	2538690	278029	275275	SPAC1687.13c	SPCC1393.05	csn5	ers1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.050447354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763092	2541529	2541470	278029	277972	SPAC1687.13c	SPAPYUG7.04c	csn5	rpb9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.993233447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763093	2541529	2542716	278029	279169	SPAC1687.13c	SPAC25H1.07	csn5	emc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446077092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763094	2541529	2543387	278029	279809	SPAC1687.13c	SPAPB1E7.02c	csn5	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.972506993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763095	2539319	2542585	275885	279040	SPCC1919.13c	SPAC31A2.13c	SPCC1919.13c	sft1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.750234936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763096	2539319	2543064	275885	279497	SPCC1919.13c	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC1919.13c	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.06562339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763097	2539319	3361561	275885	280637	SPCC1919.13c	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC1919.13c	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322088083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763098	2539319	2540296	275885	276827	SPCC1919.13c	SPBC2D10.05	SPCC1919.13c	exg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.127617295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763099	2539319	2542502	275885	278960	SPCC1919.13c	SPAC139.06	SPCC1919.13c	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.771460045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763100	2539319	2539226	275885	275796	SPCC1919.13c	SPCC16C4.20c	SPCC1919.13c	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.137291426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763101	2539319	2540220	275885	276753	SPCC1919.13c	SPBC337.03	SPCC1919.13c	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.899469873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763102	2539319	2541424	275885	277929	SPCC1919.13c	SPAC23G3.04	SPCC1919.13c	ies4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.395516821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763103	2539319	2539244	275885	275814	SPCC1919.13c	SPCC1672.06c	SPCC1919.13c	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.695596924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763104	2539319	2543563	275885	279979	SPCC1919.13c	SPAC664.02c	SPCC1919.13c	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.186597452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763105	2539319	2543426	275885	279846	SPCC1919.13c	SPAC631.02	SPCC1919.13c	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.126924888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763106	2539319	2540825	275885	277343	SPCC1919.13c	SPBC428.08c	SPCC1919.13c	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.508247363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763107	2539319	2539023	275885	275596	SPCC1919.13c	SPCC594.05c	SPCC1919.13c	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504802321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763108	2539319	2539388	275885	275953	SPCC1919.13c	SPCC24B10.12	SPCC1919.13c	cgi121	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330135866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763109	2539319	2538770	275885	275353	SPCC1919.13c	SPCC1753.02c	SPCC1919.13c	git3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.766812225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763110	2539319	2540150	275885	276687	SPCC1919.13c	SPBC16E9.14c	SPCC1919.13c	zrg17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771806306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763111	2539319	2540086	275885	276624	SPCC1919.13c	SPBC16H5.12c	SPCC1919.13c	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.759682677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763112	2539319	2540326	275885	276856	SPCC1919.13c	SPBC2G5.06c	SPCC1919.13c	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.497276025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763113	2539319	2541187	275885	277701	SPCC1919.13c	SPBC776.14	SPCC1919.13c	plh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03754055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763114	2539319	2539667	275885	276222	SPCC1919.13c	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC1919.13c	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.961246459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763115	2539319	2539974	275885	276518	SPCC1919.13c	SPBC32H8.07	SPCC1919.13c	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.199315414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763116	2539319	2540394	275885	276922	SPCC1919.13c	SPBC2D10.09	SPCC1919.13c	snr1	-	SPBC2D10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.873796577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763117	2539319	2539953	275885	276497	SPCC1919.13c	SPBC1709.11c	SPCC1919.13c	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.385076743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763118	2539319	2542439	275885	278901	SPCC1919.13c	SPAC17A5.08	SPCC1919.13c	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978237092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763119	2539319	2539368	275885	275934	SPCC1919.13c	SPCC16A11.07	SPCC1919.13c	coq10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98019494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763120	2539319	2541283	275885	277796	SPCC1919.13c	SPBP8B7.02	SPCC1919.13c	rng9	-	SPBP8B7.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.197619347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763121	2539319	2541488	275885	277990	SPCC1919.13c	SPAC227.17c	SPCC1919.13c	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.491305412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763122	2539319	2541337	275885	277848	SPCC1919.13c	SPBP35G2.13c	SPCC1919.13c	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582434772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763123	2539319	3361520	275885	280596	SPCC1919.13c	SPAC1610.02c	SPCC1919.13c	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377749492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763124	2539319	2538762	275885	275345	SPCC1919.13c	SPCC306.04c	SPCC1919.13c	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567072034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763125	2539319	2542327	275885	278793	SPCC1919.13c	SPAC16C9.06c	SPCC1919.13c	upf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77546065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763126	2539319	2540800	275885	277319	SPCC1919.13c	SPBC409.20c	SPCC1919.13c	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.336991123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763127	2539319	2540725	275885	277248	SPCC1919.13c	SPBC215.14c	SPCC1919.13c	vps20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445006538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763128	2539319	2543602	275885	280017	SPCC1919.13c	SPAPB1A11.04c	SPCC1919.13c	mca1	-	SPAPB1A11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.551490264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763129	2539319	2538840	275885	275421	SPCC1919.13c	SPCC736.07c	SPCC1919.13c	SPCC736.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.769428577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763130	2539319	2542424	275885	278886	SPCC1919.13c	SPAC1805.14	SPCC1919.13c	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.813151053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763131	2539319	2543472	275885	279892	SPCC1919.13c	SPAC959.04c	SPCC1919.13c	omh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.355435775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763132	2543164	2542207	279595	278682	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC17H9.10c	rad2	ddb1	fen1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.431659198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763133	2543164	2543617	279595	280031	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC4A8.10	rad2	SPAC4A8.10	fen1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.197005845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763134	2543164	2539301	279595	275869	SPAC3G6.06c	SPCC622.03c	rad2	SPCC622.03c	fen1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327314513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763135	2543164	2542378	279595	278842	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC1805.04	rad2	nup132	fen1	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.346031905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763136	2543164	2543578	279595	279993	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC9.10	rad2	thi9	fen1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441321902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763137	2543164	2542071	279595	278548	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC26H5.03	rad2	pcf2	fen1	cac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51896072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763138	2543164	2538806	279595	275387	SPAC3G6.06c	SPCC1840.09	rad2	SPCC1840.09	fen1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319718379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763139	2543164	2539579	279595	276138	SPAC3G6.06c	SPCP31B10.05	rad2	tdp1	fen1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.824965251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763140	2543164	2539576	279595	276136	SPAC3G6.06c	SPCC794.01c	rad2	zwf2	fen1	SPCC794.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.608505764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763141	2543164	2541045	279595	277560	SPAC3G6.06c	SPBC543.03c	rad2	pku80	fen1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.557418814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763142	2543164	2543685	279595	280099	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC3C7.03c	rad2	rad55	fen1	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.41754103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763143	2543164	2541580	279595	278077	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC1687.05	rad2	pli1	fen1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781140827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763144	2543164	2543641	279595	280055	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC3H5.08c	rad2	SPAC3H5.08c	fen1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991534378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763145	2543164	2542036	279595	278518	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC23A1.19c	rad2	hrq1	fen1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.894784147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763146	2543164	2539198	279595	275769	SPAC3G6.06c	SPCC18.09c	rad2	hnt3	fen1	SPCC18.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.703055127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763147	2543164	2540348	279595	276877	SPAC3G6.06c	SPBC29A10.05	rad2	exo1	fen1	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.5518349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763148	2543164	2540396	279595	276924	SPAC3G6.06c	SPBC31F10.12	rad2	tma20	fen1	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.302982496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763149	2543164	2539394	279595	275959	SPAC3G6.06c	SPCC1620.13	rad2	SPCC1620.13	fen1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699308683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763150	2543164	2540497	279595	277025	SPAC3G6.06c	SPBC27.04	rad2	uds1	fen1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0930305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763151	2543164	2539689	279595	276244	SPAC3G6.06c	SPBC1861.03	rad2	mak10	fen1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.9323335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763152	2543164	2542193	279595	278668	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC9G1.11c	rad2	spn4	fen1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.338622326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763153	2543164	2539667	279595	276222	SPAC3G6.06c	SPBC13G1.08c	rad2	ash2	fen1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.207460408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763154	2543164	2542032	279595	278514	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC23C11.04c	rad2	pnk1	fen1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.367611089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763155	2543164	2542007	279595	278490	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC20H4.07	rad2	rad57	fen1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.745160645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763156	2543164	2543244	279595	279672	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC6B12.06c	rad2	rrg9	fen1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.556820341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763157	2543164	2539119	279595	275691	SPAC3G6.06c	SPCC1223.13	rad2	cbf12	fen1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440422511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763158	2543164	2542437	279595	278899	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC17A5.01	rad2	pex6	fen1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317263189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763159	2543164	2539059	279595	275632	SPAC3G6.06c	SPCC737.06c	rad2	SPCC737.06c	fen1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.408833659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763160	2543164	2541746	279595	278240	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC20G4.04c	rad2	hus1	fen1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.043172844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763161	2543164	2540691	279595	277216	SPAC3G6.06c	SPBC20F10.05	rad2	nrl1	fen1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45432798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763162	2543164	2542170	279595	278645	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC17G8.13c	rad2	mst2	fen1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.666598762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763163	2543164	2542516	279595	278974	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC2F7.04	rad2	pmc2	fen1	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441231112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763164	2543164	2540498	279595	277026	SPAC3G6.06c	SPBC27.02c	rad2	ask1	fen1	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.213183445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763165	2543164	2541973	279595	278458	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC6G9.13c	rad2	bqt1	fen1	mug23|rec26	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.476651008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763166	2543164	2540891	279595	277407	SPAC3G6.06c	SPBC582.08	rad2	SPBC582.08	fen1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507527035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763167	2543164	2541638	279595	278134	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC2F7.06c	rad2	pol4	fen1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.263780389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763168	2543164	2543633	279595	280047	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC3H8.05c	rad2	mms1	fen1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.324559436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763169	2543164	2542838	279595	279284	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC13G7.11	rad2	SPAC13G7.11	fen1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.983441634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763170	2543164	2538792	279595	275373	SPAC3G6.06c	SPCP1E11.10	rad2	SPCP1E11.10	fen1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.977379786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763171	2543164	2541806	279595	278297	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC4G8.13c	rad2	prz1	fen1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.009946843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763172	2540032	2543617	276575	280031	SPBC1703.14c	SPAC4A8.10	top1	SPAC4A8.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.818710474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763173	2540032	2542723	276575	279174	SPBC1703.14c	SPAC25H1.03	top1	atg101	-	mug66	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.48265344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763174	2540032	2543637	276575	280051	SPBC1703.14c	SPAC3H8.02	top1	csr102	-	SPAC3H8.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.611622866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763175	2540032	2540528	276575	277056	SPBC1703.14c	SPBC18H10.04c	top1	sce3	-	tif48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205273921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763176	2540032	2540068	276575	276606	SPBC1703.14c	SPBC1734.12c	top1	alg12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872853713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763177	2540032	2541633	276575	278129	SPBC1703.14c	SPAC664.01c	top1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.457729514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763178	2540032	2539890	276575	276436	SPBC1703.14c	SPBC16C6.03c	top1	SPBC16C6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.872319801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763179	2540032	2538922	276575	275499	SPBC1703.14c	SPCC16C4.10	top1	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.505604555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763180	2540032	2540491	276575	277019	SPBC1703.14c	SPBC28E12.04	top1	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451485091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763181	2540032	2542816	276575	279263	SPBC1703.14c	SPAC4G8.11c	top1	atp10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.331020006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763182	2540032	2542724	276575	279175	SPBC1703.14c	SPAC767.01c	top1	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934663774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763183	2540032	2542709	276575	279162	SPBC1703.14c	SPAC26F1.08c	top1	SPAC26F1.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876662465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763184	2540032	2539575	276575	276135	SPBC1703.14c	SPCP20C8.02c	top1	SPCP20C8.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.192547174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763185	2540032	2542022	276575	278505	SPBC1703.14c	SPAC23A1.03	top1	apt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.394079876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763186	2540032	2540595	276575	277121	SPBC1703.14c	SPBC21C3.02c	top1	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511802615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763187	2540032	2542331	276575	278797	SPBC1703.14c	SPAC1834.05	top1	alg9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925312287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763188	2540032	2542239	276575	278711	SPBC1703.14c	SPAC18G6.02c	top1	chp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.144315447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763189	2540032	2540797	276575	277316	SPBC1703.14c	SPBC18H10.11c	top1	ppr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095911806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763190	2540032	2542513	276575	278971	SPBC1703.14c	SPAC1952.05	top1	gcn5	-	kat2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87690709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763191	2540032	2543144	276575	279576	SPBC1703.14c	SPAC3F10.05c	top1	mug113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633872715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763192	2540032	2539857	276575	276404	SPBC1703.14c	SPBC1604.20c	top1	tea2	-	klp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.669840976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763193	2540032	2542007	276575	278490	SPBC1703.14c	SPAC20H4.07	top1	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.275395657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763194	2540032	2539974	276575	276518	SPBC1703.14c	SPBC32H8.07	top1	git5	-	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.264326787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763195	2540032	2541720	276575	278214	SPBC1703.14c	SPAC23H3.13c	top1	gpa2	-	git8	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035704123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763196	2540032	2541241	276575	277755	SPBC1703.14c	SPBC887.17	top1	SPBC887.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711893241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763197	2540032	2539953	276575	276497	SPBC1703.14c	SPBC1709.11c	top1	png2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.406213097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763198	2540032	2542437	276575	278899	SPBC1703.14c	SPAC17A5.01	top1	pex6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.622133443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763199	2540032	2542439	276575	278901	SPBC1703.14c	SPAC17A5.08	top1	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81961008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763200	2540032	3361030	276575	280106	SPBC1703.14c	SPCP20C8.03	top1	SPCP20C8.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.092128318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763201	2540032	2542255	276575	278725	SPBC1703.14c	SPAC57A7.08	top1	pzh1	-	phz1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930944626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763202	2540032	2542781	276575	279230	SPBC1703.14c	SPAC57A10.12c	top1	ura3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508744488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763203	2540032	2540930	276575	277446	SPBC1703.14c	SPBC354.10	top1	def1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808714315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763204	2540032	2539245	276575	275815	SPBC1703.14c	SPCC1322.07c	top1	mug150	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931516571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763205	2540032	2540061	276575	276599	SPBC1703.14c	SPBC119.12	top1	rud3	-	SPBC119.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.261146042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763206	2540032	2541909	276575	278399	SPBC1703.14c	SPAC227.01c	top1	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.590485892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763207	2540032	2539600	276575	276158	SPBC1703.14c	SPCP1E11.03	top1	mug170	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391852082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763208	2540032	2541372	276575	277883	SPBC1703.14c	SPBP8B7.28c	top1	stc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98849486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763209	2540032	2542458	276575	278919	SPBC1703.14c	SPAC30.02c	top1	SPAC30.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043686634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763210	2540032	2541531	276575	278031	SPBC1703.14c	SPAC25A8.01c	top1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505425661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763211	2540032	2540829	276575	277347	SPBC1703.14c	SPBC800.09	top1	sum2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.259343848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763212	2540032	2542418	276575	278881	SPBC1703.14c	SPAC1805.07c	top1	dad2	-	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812054633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763213	2540032	2540297	276575	276828	SPBC1703.14c	SPBC24C6.08c	top1	bhd1	-	bhd	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.915709022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763214	2540032	2538795	276575	275376	SPBC1703.14c	SPCC1884.01	top1	SPCC1884.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.056552426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763215	2540032	2542309	276575	278775	SPBC1703.14c	SPAC16A10.02	top1	sub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.701223517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763216	2540032	2541151	276575	277666	SPBC1703.14c	SPBC713.03	top1	SPBC713.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.910843545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763217	2540032	2543384	276575	279806	SPBC1703.14c	SPAC637.06	top1	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982595509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763218	2540032	2540173	276575	276706	SPBC1703.14c	SPBC106.13	top1	SPBC106.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771165862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763219	2540032	2543087	276575	279520	SPBC1703.14c	SPAC30C2.04	top1	SPAC30C2.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808308286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763220	2540032	2543523	276575	279941	SPBC1703.14c	SPAC4F10.16c	top1	SPAC4F10.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873213724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763221	2540032	2543624	276575	280038	SPBC1703.14c	SPAC4D7.06c	top1	SPAC4D7.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388625049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763222	2540905	2541912	277421	278402	SPBC530.06c	SPAC222.16c	clu1	csn3	SPBC530.06c	SPAC821.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92225522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763223	2540905	2540131	277421	276668	SPBC530.06c	SPBC1778.05c	clu1	SPBC1778.05c	SPBC530.06c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.313811027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763224	2540905	2539235	277421	275805	SPBC530.06c	SPCC1682.15	clu1	mug122	SPBC530.06c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330609712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763225	2540905	2539293	277421	275861	SPBC530.06c	SPCC553.08c	clu1	ria1	SPBC530.06c	SPCC553.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.766629518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763226	2540905	2538945	277421	275519	SPBC530.06c	SPCC1739.06c	clu1	SPCC1739.06c	SPBC530.06c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568067115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763227	2542972	2540086	279411	276624	SPAPYUG7.02c	SPBC16H5.12c	sin1	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454468641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763228	2542972	2539043	279411	275616	SPAPYUG7.02c	SPCC1235.08c	sin1	pdh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808777916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763229	2539303	2542293	275871	278761	SPCC1020.09	SPAC17G8.14c	gnr1	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.117263872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763230	2539303	2541012	275871	277527	SPCC1020.09	SPBC3H7.12	gnr1	rav2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505751534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763231	2539303	2539129	275871	275701	SPCC1020.09	SPCC338.14	gnr1	ado1	-	SPCC338.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446036538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763232	2539303	2542507	275871	278965	SPCC1020.09	SPAC18G6.13	gnr1	SPAC18G6.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.255615852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763233	2539303	2539847	275871	276395	SPCC1020.09	SPBC530.14c	gnr1	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.414480463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763234	2539303	2538848	275871	275429	SPCC1020.09	SPCC613.12c	gnr1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.446969341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763235	2539303	2543567	275871	279983	SPCC1020.09	SPAC890.03	gnr1	ppk16	-	mug92	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.028851011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763236	2539303	2540325	275871	276855	SPCC1020.09	SPBC21B10.10	gnr1	rps402	-	rps4-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.100493508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763237	2539303	2539514	275871	276076	SPCC1020.09	SPCC663.14c	gnr1	trp663	-	SPCC663.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640433896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763238	2539303	2539772	275871	276323	SPCC1020.09	SPBC1734.05c	gnr1	spf31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.621204558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763239	2539303	2542442	275871	278904	SPCC1020.09	SPACUNK12.02c	gnr1	cmk1	-	CaMK-I|SPAC25D11.02C	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04140662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763240	2539303	2543327	275871	279750	SPCC1020.09	SPAC1D4.06c	gnr1	csk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992234235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763241	2539130	2538939	275702	275514	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1672.04c	amk2	SPCC1672.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.630219596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763242	2539130	2542577	275702	279033	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC19G12.15c	amk2	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.201430831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763243	2539130	2540105	275702	276642	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC106.04	amk2	ada1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924625181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763244	2539130	2543617	275702	280031	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC4A8.10	amk2	SPAC4A8.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572616168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763245	2539130	2542598	275702	279052	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC6G10.08	amk2	idp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451810322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763246	2539130	2542518	275702	278976	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1B3.16c	amk2	vht1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.767102778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763247	2539130	2543637	275702	280051	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC3H8.02	amk2	csr102	-	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507491633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763248	2539130	2541512	275702	278013	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC11E3.08c	amk2	nse6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815352706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763249	2539130	2542706	275702	279159	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC29B12.13	amk2	SPAC29B12.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099212424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763250	2539130	2540131	275702	276668	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1778.05c	amk2	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.80914986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763251	2539130	2538993	275702	275567	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC162.12	amk2	tco89	-	SPCC1753.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87348516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763252	2539130	2538896	275702	275474	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC584.11c	amk2	SPCC584.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922635895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763253	2539130	2539930	275702	276474	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1198.11c	amk2	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.755227964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763254	2539130	3361561	275702	280637	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC11E3.01c	amk2	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986607176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763255	2539130	2541117	275702	277632	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC646.13	amk2	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.13370219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763256	2539130	2541051	275702	277566	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC3E7.08c	amk2	rad13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152674222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763257	2539130	2539196	275702	275767	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1795.03	amk2	gms1	-	gmn3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.928269025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763258	2539130	2542758	275702	279208	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC15E1.02c	amk2	SPAC15E1.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.839572608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763259	2539130	2543652	275702	280066	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC4H3.03c	amk2	SPAC4H3.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047157764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763260	2539130	2542492	275702	278951	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1B9.02c	amk2	sck1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512638331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763261	2539130	2543434	275702	279854	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC8F11.02c	amk2	dph3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147984135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763262	2539130	2539201	275702	275772	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC188.09c	amk2	pfl4	-	SPCC188.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.55987846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763263	2539130	2538922	275702	275499	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC16C4.10	amk2	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.49256176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763264	2539130	2542986	275702	279424	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC11D3.14c	amk2	SPAC11D3.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.539361205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763265	2539130	2540491	275702	277019	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC28E12.04	amk2	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.625912357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763266	2539130	3361436	275702	280512	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1296.01c	amk2	SPAC1296.01c	-	SPAC22F3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.439928923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763267	2539130	2541200	275702	277714	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC8D2.03c	amk2	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820726041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763268	2539130	2542107	275702	278583	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC30.01c	amk2	sec72	-	sec7b|sec702	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.615587984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763269	2539130	2541012	275702	277527	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC3H7.12	amk2	rav2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.060508394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763270	2539130	2539443	275702	276006	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC736.02	amk2	SPCC736.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.619869695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763271	2539130	2541058	275702	277573	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC3H7.09	amk2	erf2	-	mug142	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.407098434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763272	2539130	2539235	275702	275805	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1682.15	amk2	mug122	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989508066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763273	2539130	2539434	275702	275997	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC757.09c	amk2	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503575404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763274	2539130	2543453	275702	279873	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC3G9.03	amk2	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.26146206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763275	2539130	2541323	275702	277835	SPCC1919.03c	SPBP35G2.14	amk2	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.901453174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763276	2539130	2542277	275702	278746	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC17A5.02c	amk2	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389952285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763277	2539130	2539792	275702	276342	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1271.14	amk2	SPBC1271.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044269429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763278	2539130	2542180	275702	278655	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC589.07c	amk2	atg1801	-	atg18|atg18a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807696663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763279	2539130	2543685	275702	280099	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC3C7.03c	amk2	rad55	-	rhp55	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.773508641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763280	2539130	2539441	275702	276004	SPCC1919.03c	SPCPJ732.02c	amk2	xks1	-	SPCPJ732.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.155425382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763281	2539130	2543308	275702	279732	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC694.04c	amk2	SPAC694.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9780243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763282	2539130	2542220	275702	278694	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1A6.03c	amk2	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148393565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763283	2539130	2539961	275702	276505	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1198.09	amk2	ubc16	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81043029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763284	2539130	2543563	275702	279979	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC664.02c	amk2	arp8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931690616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763285	2539130	2543543	275702	279960	SPCC1919.03c	SPAPB24D3.06c	amk2	SPAPB24D3.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452397215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763286	2539130	2541020	275702	277535	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC354.04	amk2	SPBC354.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.714309402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763287	2539130	2541021	275702	277536	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC3B8.10c	amk2	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.211258127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763288	2539130	2539960	275702	276504	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC15D4.15	amk2	pho2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.837458998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763289	2539130	2542033	275702	278515	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC2C4.09	amk2	SPAC2C4.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924816219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763290	2539130	2543349	275702	279771	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC977.02	amk2	SPAC977.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.978773663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763291	2539130	2542177	275702	278652	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC17H9.08	amk2	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872856608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763292	2539130	2540797	275702	277316	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC18H10.11c	amk2	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.152048715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763293	2539130	2540631	275702	277157	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC25B2.10	amk2	SPBC25B2.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.336643875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763294	2539130	2542863	275702	279309	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC13G7.04c	amk2	mac1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.803702015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763295	2539130	2538770	275702	275353	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1753.02c	amk2	git3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045947131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763296	2539130	2539628	275702	276185	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1604.03c	amk2	SPBC1604.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.720965279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763297	2539130	2542652	275702	279106	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1687.15	amk2	gsk3	-	skp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.471915135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763298	2539130	2541160	275702	277675	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC725.09c	amk2	hob3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.818696083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763299	2539130	2542544	275702	279001	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC18G6.10	amk2	lem2	-	heh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.255793867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763300	2539130	2542507	275702	278965	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC18G6.13	amk2	SPAC18G6.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983338361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763301	2539130	2541735	275702	278229	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC7D4.04	amk2	atg11	-	taf1|cvt9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.026956523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763302	2539130	2542168	275702	278643	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC17A5.16	amk2	ftp105	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.937110093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763303	2539130	2542817	275702	279264	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC13G6.02c	amk2	rps101	-	rps1-1|rps3a-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981919562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763304	2539130	2543531	275702	279949	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC926.06c	amk2	SPAC926.06c	-	lrr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.515179784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763305	2539130	2542469	275702	278930	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC19A8.04	amk2	erg5	-	cyp61	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450755453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763306	2539130	2542522	275702	278980	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC19A8.03	amk2	ymr1	-	SPAC19A8.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573240395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763307	2539130	2541166	275702	277681	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC725.15	amk2	ura5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.563679628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763308	2539130	2539603	275702	276161	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1289.06c	amk2	ppr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442993234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763309	2539130	3361455	275702	280531	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1782.01	amk2	ecm29	-	SPAPYUG7.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.339782621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763310	2539130	2538994	275702	275568	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC553.01c	amk2	dbl2	-	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.938061843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763311	2539130	2543643	275702	280057	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC3G9.07c	amk2	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.127166094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763312	2539130	2543250	275702	279678	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC3G9.15c	amk2	fcf2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983355856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763313	2539130	2538852	275702	275433	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC4E9.01c	amk2	rec11	-	SPCC550.16c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985637752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763314	2539130	2538808	275702	275389	SPCC1919.03c	SPCPB16A4.05c	amk2	SPCPB16A4.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.51632846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763315	2539130	2539284	275702	275852	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC584.15c	amk2	SPCC584.15c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.613207371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763316	2539130	2541704	275702	278199	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1250.04c	amk2	atl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872397582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763317	2539130	3361269	275702	280345	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC31A8.01c	amk2	rtn1	-	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.339365145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763318	2539130	2542007	275702	278490	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC20H4.07	amk2	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985157481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763319	2539130	2540997	275702	277513	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC3H7.06c	amk2	pof9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.188251729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763320	2539130	2540961	275702	277477	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC36B7.03	amk2	sec63	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.617915792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763321	2539130	2539974	275702	276518	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC32H8.07	amk2	git5	-	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98472783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763322	2539130	2542254	275702	278724	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC30D11.04c	amk2	nup124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781069864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763323	2539130	2542519	275702	278977	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC19G12.08	amk2	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.200799532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763324	2539130	2540094	275702	276632	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC146.10	amk2	mug57	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.27502986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763325	2539130	2540990	275702	277506	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC36B7.06c	amk2	mug20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.514646818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763326	2539130	2543443	275702	279863	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC3H1.12c	amk2	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.58060861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763327	2539130	2543119	275702	279551	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC3A11.07	amk2	nde2	-	SPAC3A11.07	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701441741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763328	2539130	2542008	275702	278491	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC2G11.07c	amk2	ptc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321045594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763329	2539130	2538708	275702	275292	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC594.01	amk2	SPCC594.01	-	SPCC736.16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.924054128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763330	2539130	2540201	275702	276734	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC13A2.04c	amk2	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869945336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763331	2539130	2542597	275702	279051	SPCC1919.03c	SPAP8A3.07c	amk2	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926022022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763332	2539130	2542267	275702	278736	SPCC1919.03c	SPAPYUK71.03c	amk2	syn1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094441244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763333	2539130	2539847	275702	276395	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC530.14c	amk2	dsk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991463461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763334	2539130	2540533	275702	277061	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC29A10.16c	amk2	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.021167488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763335	2539130	2540988	275702	277504	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC354.08c	amk2	SPBC354.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.459896838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763336	2539130	2542781	275702	279230	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC57A10.12c	amk2	ura3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.340616852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763337	2539130	2541742	275702	278236	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC22H10.09	amk2	SPAC22H10.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.752752924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763338	2539130	2543193	275702	279622	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC3F10.11c	amk2	abc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.615082772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763339	2539130	3361520	275702	280596	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1610.02c	amk2	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.74456941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763340	2539130	2541017	275702	277532	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC36.07	amk2	elp1	-	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.332370858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763341	2539130	2540001	275702	276545	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1289.13c	amk2	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.335901047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763342	2539130	2539906	275702	276452	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC16G5.17	amk2	SPBC16G5.17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812238571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763343	2539130	2540442	275702	276970	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC25B2.04c	amk2	mtg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.773781632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763344	2539130	2542992	275702	279430	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1071.09c	amk2	SPAC1071.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.340616133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763345	2539130	2541156	275702	277671	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC685.07c	amk2	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.025128406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763346	2539130	2543619	275702	280033	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC4F10.04	amk2	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815740959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763347	2539130	2542847	275702	279293	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1420.01c	amk2	SPAC1420.01c	-	SPAC56E4.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815593137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763348	2539130	2540061	275702	276599	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC119.12	amk2	rud3	-	SPBC119.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580532707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763349	2539130	2539137	275702	275709	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1682.08c	amk2	mcp2	-	SPCC1682.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.404582782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763350	2539130	2538761	275702	275344	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC622.02	amk2	SPCC622.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987781991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763351	2539130	2542883	275702	279328	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1486.04c	amk2	alm1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.269545008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763352	2539130	2542881	275702	279326	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC13F5.03c	amk2	gld1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.454993762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763353	2539130	5802917	275702	858055	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC17A2.14	amk2	SPAC17A2.14	-	SPAC17G6.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982403537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763354	2539130	2543600	275702	280015	SPCC1919.03c	SPAPB1A10.05	amk2	SPAPB1A10.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328288489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763355	2539130	2539925	275702	276469	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC16H5.13	amk2	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.813217277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763356	2539130	2540814	275702	277333	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC4B4.10c	amk2	atg5	-	mug77	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195925906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763357	2539130	2543304	275702	279728	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC6B12.12	amk2	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.069036837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763358	2539130	2542947	275702	279387	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC11D3.03c	amk2	SPAC11D3.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812458272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763359	2539130	2539614	275702	276172	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC17D11.08	amk2	SPBC17D11.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.466057547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763360	2539130	2542472	275702	278933	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC9E9.13	amk2	wos2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870069149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763361	2539130	2543066	275702	279499	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC343.12	amk2	rds1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98765417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763362	2539130	2542306	275702	278773	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC29A4.11	amk2	rga3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.344385651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763363	2539130	2541149	275702	277664	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC651.03c	amk2	gyp10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815259523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763364	2539130	2540629	275702	277155	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC21D10.09c	amk2	rkr1	-	SPBC21D10.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.316668573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763365	2539130	2539668	275702	276223	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC11B10.10c	amk2	pht1	-	pi001	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.270759652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763366	2539130	2541380	275702	277891	SPCC1919.03c	SPBPB2B2.13	amk2	gal1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991985545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763367	2539130	2540516	275702	277044	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC21C3.01c	amk2	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.144319503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763368	2539130	2542386	275702	278850	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1805.01c	amk2	ppk6	-	SPAPJ736.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.352882248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763369	2539130	2540489	275702	277017	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC25H2.03	amk2	SPBC25H2.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819729674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763370	2539130	2540380	275702	276909	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1A4.05	amk2	blt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870563225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763371	2539130	2540896	275702	277412	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC19C2.13c	amk2	ctu2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.720708584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763372	2539130	2539410	275702	275975	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC4G3.17	amk2	SPCC4G3.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.39140853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763373	2539130	5802702	275702	857840	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1235.15	amk2	dga1	-	SPCC548.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.93464314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763374	2539130	2539169	275702	275740	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1235.11	amk2	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.199741611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763375	2539130	2543220	275702	279648	SPCC1919.03c	SPAPB21F2.02	amk2	SPAPB21F2.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.560950076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763376	2539130	2543379	275702	279801	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC821.09	amk2	eng1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876552004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763377	2539130	2543327	275702	279750	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1D4.06c	amk2	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712799172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763378	2539130	2540314	275702	276844	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC2G5.03	amk2	ctu1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.714000005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763379	2539130	2541869	275702	278359	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC22F3.13	amk2	tsc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.410688257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763380	2539130	2541050	275702	277565	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC428.05c	amk2	arg12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.636980821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763381	2539130	2540309	275702	276839	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC21B10.13c	amk2	yox1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.417628921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763382	2539130	2543501	275702	279919	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC664.14	amk2	amt2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814960988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763383	2539130	2541062	275702	277577	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC660.11	amk2	tcg1	-	mug187	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.763686044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763384	2539130	2538730	275702	275314	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC31H12.02c	amk2	mug73	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.00208815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763385	2542109	2541818	278585	278309	SPAC1687.16c	SPAC11G7.02	erg31	pub1	erg3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989097472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763386	2542109	2540296	278585	276827	SPAC1687.16c	SPBC2D10.05	erg31	exg3	erg3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319190895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763387	2542109	2540491	278585	277019	SPAC1687.16c	SPBC28E12.04	erg31	SPBC28E12.04	erg3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.376888089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763388	2542109	2540463	278585	276991	SPAC1687.16c	SPBC2F12.15c	erg31	pfa3	erg3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642940758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763389	2542109	2542022	278585	278505	SPAC1687.16c	SPAC23A1.03	erg31	apt1	erg3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507266778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763390	2542109	2542023	278585	278506	SPAC1687.16c	SPAC20H4.10	erg31	ufd2	erg3	SPAC145.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.842494721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763391	2542109	2540467	278585	276995	SPAC1687.16c	SPBC2G2.07c	erg31	mug178	erg3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.98671702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763392	2542109	2543296	278585	279721	SPAC1687.16c	SPAC9E9.03	erg31	leu2	erg3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328754329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763393	2542109	2539092	278585	275664	SPAC1687.16c	SPCC1259.08	erg31	SPCC1259.08	erg3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384511648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763394	2542109	2539705	278585	276258	SPAC1687.16c	SPBC1105.10	erg31	rav1	erg3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.151259131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763395	2542109	2541160	278585	277675	SPAC1687.16c	SPBC725.09c	erg31	hob3	erg3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.923120008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763396	2542109	2541892	278585	278382	SPAC1687.16c	SPAP27G11.02	erg31	SPAP27G11.02	erg3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439518844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763397	2542109	2539898	278585	276444	SPAC1687.16c	SPBC12D12.07c	erg31	trx2	erg3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.804319423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763398	2542109	2539603	278585	276161	SPAC1687.16c	SPBC1289.06c	erg31	ppr8	erg3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.841850563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763399	2542109	2539368	278585	275934	SPAC1687.16c	SPCC16A11.07	erg31	coq10	erg3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.564034274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763400	2542109	2540533	278585	277061	SPAC1687.16c	SPBC29A10.16c	erg31	SPBC29A10.16c	erg3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.670413001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763401	2542109	2541742	278585	278236	SPAC1687.16c	SPAC22H10.09	erg31	SPAC22H10.09	erg3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.069752635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763402	2542109	2543113	278585	279545	SPAC1687.16c	SPAC3F10.07c	erg31	erf4	erg3	mug91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319742728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763403	2542109	2540242	278585	276774	SPAC1687.16c	SPBC32F12.07c	erg31	SPBC32F12.07c	erg3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639111233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763404	2542109	2542881	278585	279326	SPAC1687.16c	SPAC13F5.03c	erg31	gld1	erg3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.63378652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763405	2542109	2542515	278585	278973	SPAC1687.16c	SPAC1952.09c	erg31	SPAC1952.09c	erg3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57936808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763406	2542109	2543096	278585	279528	SPAC1687.16c	SPAC977.05c	erg31	SPAC977.05c	erg3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930036432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763407	2542109	2541358	278585	277869	SPAC1687.16c	SPBP4H10.16c	erg31	SPBP4H10.16c	erg3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387812524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763408	2542109	2541432	278585	277937	SPAC1687.16c	SPAC1F5.05c	erg31	mso1	erg3	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.386120131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763409	2542109	2539205	278585	275775	SPAC1687.16c	SPCC4B3.15	erg31	mid1	erg3	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.00605183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763410	2542109	2541151	278585	277666	SPAC1687.16c	SPBC713.03	erg31	SPBC713.03	erg3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706381737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763411	2542109	2542716	278585	279169	SPAC1687.16c	SPAC25H1.07	erg31	emc1	erg3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569263599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763412	2542109	2541260	278585	277774	SPAC1687.16c	SPBC902.05c	erg31	idh2	erg3	glu2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509574595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763413	2540118	2542207	276655	278682	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC17H9.10c	rem1	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.443305985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763414	2540118	2542598	276655	279052	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC6G10.08	rem1	idp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926619881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763415	2540118	2542585	276655	279040	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC31A2.13c	rem1	sft1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913331157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763416	2540118	2542812	276655	279259	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC6F6.01	rem1	cch1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.997247044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763417	2540118	2538993	276655	275567	SPBC16E9.17c	SPCC162.12	rem1	tco89	-	SPCC1753.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844260016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763418	2540118	2539226	276655	275796	SPBC16E9.17c	SPCC16C4.20c	rem1	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645338214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763419	2540118	2541500	276655	278002	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC227.18	rem1	lys3	-	SPAC2F7.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.777322436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763420	2540118	2542696	276655	279149	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC29B12.03	rem1	spd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.27476477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763421	2540118	2541119	276655	277634	SPBC16E9.17c	SPBC651.11c	rem1	apm3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.052975029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763422	2540118	2539792	276655	276342	SPBC16E9.17c	SPBC1271.14	rem1	SPBC1271.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.803654859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763423	2540118	2541960	276655	278447	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC6G9.15c	rem1	SPAC6G9.15c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.806932239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763424	2540118	2543584	276655	279999	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAPB1E7.11c	rem1	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574502211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763425	2540118	2539352	276655	275918	SPBC16E9.17c	SPCC188.07	rem1	ccq1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.06317051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763426	2540118	2539381	276655	275947	SPBC16E9.17c	SPCC1739.10	rem1	mug33	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.316848953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763427	2540118	2543615	276655	280029	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC4F8.08	rem1	mug114	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381474686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763428	2540118	2542554	276655	279011	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC1952.03	rem1	otu2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.938633094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763429	2540118	2542568	276655	279024	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC1952.02	rem1	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634138225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763430	2540118	2541275	276655	277789	SPBC16E9.17c	SPBC947.06c	rem1	SPBC947.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709906737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763431	2540118	2541687	276655	278183	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC1F7.06	rem1	hsp3105	-	SPAC1F7.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320500872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763432	2540118	2542311	276655	278777	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC16A10.05c	rem1	dad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.981347214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763433	2540118	2543461	276655	279881	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC521.03	rem1	SPAC521.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869723379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763434	2540118	2543144	276655	279576	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC3F10.05c	rem1	mug113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322502343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763435	2540118	2543593	276655	280008	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC4G9.10	rem1	arg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.198189971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763436	2540118	2541982	276655	278467	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC23A1.06c	rem1	cmk2	-	mkp2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81251561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763437	2540118	2542699	276655	279152	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC5H10.07	rem1	SPAC5H10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320585741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763438	2540118	2541183	276655	277697	SPBC16E9.17c	SPBC725.14	rem1	arg6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577002541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763439	2540118	2538890	276655	275468	SPBC16E9.17c	SPCC1393.02c	rem1	spt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.518188503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763440	2540118	2543396	276655	279818	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC4D7.11	rem1	dsc4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443547037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763441	2540118	2540326	276655	276856	SPBC16E9.17c	SPBC2G5.06c	rem1	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979197235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763442	2540118	2542946	276655	279386	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC6F12.03c	rem1	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580253492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763443	2540118	2540394	276655	276922	SPBC16E9.17c	SPBC2D10.09	rem1	snr1	-	SPBC2D10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.767386992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763444	2540118	2542867	276655	279312	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC343.16	rem1	lys2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321270249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763445	2540118	2540530	276655	277058	SPBC16E9.17c	SPBC405.05	rem1	atg16	-	SPBC405.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.878313853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763446	2540118	2539119	276655	275691	SPBC16E9.17c	SPCC1223.13	rem1	cbf12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984382681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763447	2540118	2542439	276655	278901	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC17A5.08	rem1	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.710070839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763448	2540118	2543443	276655	279863	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC3H1.12c	rem1	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643050972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763449	2540118	2538708	276655	275292	SPBC16E9.17c	SPCC594.01	rem1	SPCC594.01	-	SPCC736.16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51256154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763450	2540118	2542597	276655	279051	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAP8A3.07c	rem1	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.194389889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763451	2540118	2541488	276655	277990	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC227.17c	rem1	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.603572829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763452	2540118	2539605	276655	276163	SPBC16E9.17c	SPBC1105.13c	rem1	SPBC1105.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328699533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763453	2540118	2540910	276655	277426	SPBC16E9.17c	SPBC577.02	rem1	rpl3801	-	rpl38-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.503538935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763454	2540118	2540442	276655	276970	SPBC16E9.17c	SPBC25B2.04c	rem1	mtg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.867381232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763455	2540118	2538762	276655	275345	SPBC16E9.17c	SPCC306.04c	rem1	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.646424392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763456	2540118	2541909	276655	278399	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC227.01c	rem1	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450111508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763457	2540118	2542541	276655	278998	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC1B3.03c	rem1	wis2	-	cyp5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.445501679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763458	2540118	2540464	276655	276992	SPBC16E9.17c	SPBC23E6.02	rem1	rrp2	-	SPBC23E6.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567000211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763459	2540118	2542940	276655	279381	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC31A2.12	rem1	SPAC31A2.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389221305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763460	2540118	2539614	276655	276172	SPBC16E9.17c	SPBC17D11.08	rem1	SPBC17D11.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451881435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763461	2540118	2541114	276655	277629	SPBC16E9.17c	SPBC582.09	rem1	pex11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807344556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763462	2540118	2542731	276655	279181	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC5H10.09c	rem1	SPAC5H10.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.31824704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763463	2540118	2542826	276655	279273	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC13G6.09	rem1	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378173661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763464	2540118	2543602	276655	280017	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAPB1A11.04c	rem1	mca1	-	SPAPB1A11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.051602196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763465	2540118	2542416	276655	278880	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC589.03c	rem1	SPAC589.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.201968034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763466	2540118	2540992	276655	277508	SPBC16E9.17c	SPBC342.05	rem1	crb2	-	rhp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.907727197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763467	2540118	2543380	276655	279802	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC4G9.16c	rem1	rpl901	-	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454800877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763468	2540118	2539700	276655	276253	SPBC16E9.17c	SPBC1685.15c	rem1	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.630657359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763469	2540118	2543384	276655	279806	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC637.06	rem1	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578739289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763470	2540118	2543387	276655	279809	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAPB1E7.02c	rem1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.700335941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763471	2540118	2543471	276655	279891	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC513.07	rem1	SPAC513.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.500733091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763472	2540118	2539014	276655	275587	SPBC16E9.17c	SPCC18B5.05c	rem1	SPCC18B5.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.931696891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763473	2540118	2540360	276655	276889	SPBC16E9.17c	SPBC2G5.01	rem1	SPBC2G5.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.192489529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763474	2540118	2542830	276655	279277	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC57A10.08c	rem1	SPAC57A10.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647533047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763475	2540118	2542104	276655	278580	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC869.02c	rem1	SPAC869.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.539705262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763476	2540118	2542424	276655	278886	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC1805.14	rem1	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448491512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763477	2540118	2541050	276655	277565	SPBC16E9.17c	SPBC428.05c	rem1	arg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380969291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763478	2540118	2539085	276655	275657	SPBC16E9.17c	SPCC285.15c	rem1	rps2802	-	rps28|rps28-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.441504834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763479	2540118	2541808	276655	278299	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC22A12.14c	rem1	SPAC22A12.14c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.921941282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763480	2540118	2538947	276655	275521	SPBC16E9.17c	SPCC1682.12c	rem1	ubp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384378933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763481	2540118	2542609	276655	279063	SPBC16E9.17c	SPAC31G5.04	rem1	lys12	-	SPAC31G5.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.839186476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763482	2540118	2540649	276655	277174	SPBC16E9.17c	SPBC19F8.08	rem1	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.056634821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763483	2540008	2539405	276552	275970	SPBC12D12.02c	SPCC553.03	cdm1	pex1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.25640798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763484	2540008	2541135	276552	277650	SPBC12D12.02c	SPBC839.03c	cdm1	SPBC839.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.409932752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763485	2540008	2542098	276552	278574	SPBC12D12.02c	SPAC30D11.01c	cdm1	gto2	-	SPAC30D11.01c|SPAC56F8.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.662206774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763486	2540008	2540919	276552	277435	SPBC12D12.02c	SPBC543.07	cdm1	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09170487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763487	2540008	2540220	276552	276753	SPBC12D12.02c	SPBC337.03	cdm1	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.944200372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763488	2540008	2539797	276552	276347	SPBC12D12.02c	SPBC16G5.14c	cdm1	rps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383503133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763489	2540008	2540160	276552	276695	SPBC12D12.02c	SPBC1773.17c	cdm1	SPBC1773.17c	-	SPBP26C9.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391414849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763490	2540008	2541761	276552	278255	SPBC12D12.02c	SPAC7D4.12c	cdm1	SPAC7D4.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98863293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763491	2540008	2542558	276552	279014	SPBC12D12.02c	SPAC1952.07	cdm1	rad1	-	rad19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811582851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763492	2540008	2542596	276552	279050	SPBC12D12.02c	SPAC1B3.17	cdm1	clr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.450300482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763493	2540008	2543406	276552	279828	SPBC12D12.02c	SPAC9.12c	cdm1	atp12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046453723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763494	2540008	2538769	276552	275352	SPBC12D12.02c	SPCC126.04c	cdm1	sgf73	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.496742661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763495	2540008	2538873	276552	275452	SPBC12D12.02c	SPCC306.11	cdm1	SPCC306.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390093368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763496	2540008	2541927	276552	278415	SPBC12D12.02c	SPAC222.12c	cdm1	atp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320744781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763497	2540008	2539113	276552	275685	SPBC12D12.02c	SPCC1919.11	cdm1	mug137	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931665753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763498	2540008	2543220	276552	279648	SPBC12D12.02c	SPAPB21F2.02	cdm1	SPAPB21F2.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098294727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763499	2540008	2543387	276552	279809	SPBC12D12.02c	SPAPB1E7.02c	cdm1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63400353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763500	2543680	2542701	280094	279154	SPAC4G9.20c	SPAC26H5.05	SPAC4G9.20c	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503497559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763501	2543680	2540929	280094	277445	SPAC4G9.20c	SPBC354.03	SPAC4G9.20c	swd3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.8737832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763502	2543680	2542969	280094	279409	SPAC4G9.20c	SPAC4G8.10	SPAC4G9.20c	gos1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511116891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763503	2543680	2540964	280094	277480	SPAC4G9.20c	SPBC365.16	SPAC4G9.20c	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.082701261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763504	2543680	2541801	280094	278292	SPAC4G9.20c	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC4G9.20c	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.473738492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763505	2540069	2543320	276607	279744	SPBC106.02c	SPAPJ695.01c	srx1	SPAPJ695.01c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813534579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763506	2540069	2541628	276607	278124	SPBC106.02c	SPAC110.02	srx1	pds5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.15094884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763507	2540133	2538939	276670	275514	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC1672.04c	php5	SPCC1672.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039879472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763508	2540133	2543497	276670	279916	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC926.09c	php5	fas1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.080500779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763509	2540133	2542895	276670	279339	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC13G6.10c	php5	asl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.567270757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763510	2540133	2541475	276670	277977	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC24B11.09	php5	mpc2	-	SPAC24B11.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.562659506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763511	2540133	2541204	276670	277718	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC839.06	php5	cta3	-	SPBC24E9.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988150496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763512	2540133	2540942	276670	277458	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC3H7.14	php5	mug176	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154547365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763513	2540133	2542430	276670	278892	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC17G6.06	php5	rps2401	-	rps24|rps24-1|rps24a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042847869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763514	2540133	2542598	276670	279052	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC6G10.08	php5	idp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452001026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763515	2540133	2542080	276670	278557	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC27D7.03c	php5	mei2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.12112571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763516	2540133	2542382	276670	278846	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC6G10.06	php5	SPAC6G10.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870252865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763517	2540133	2542518	276670	278976	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC1B3.16c	php5	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.124917072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763518	2540133	2543152	276670	279584	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC869.03c	php5	SPAC869.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98430992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763519	2540133	2541912	276670	278402	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC222.16c	php5	csn3	-	SPAC821.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.333445505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763520	2540133	2539684	276670	276239	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC16A3.16	php5	SPBC16A3.16	-	cwc27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.323423389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763521	2540133	2542127	276670	278603	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC1952.12c	php5	csn71	-	csn7|csn7a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86695632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763522	2540133	2543064	276670	279497	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC3G6.01	php5	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.079167394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763523	2540133	2542197	276670	278672	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC1142.01	php5	rqc1	-	SPAC1142.01|SPAC17G6.18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86686383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763524	2540133	2540524	276670	277052	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC21B10.08c	php5	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.016615007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763525	2540133	2542358	276670	278823	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC1782.09c	php5	clp1	-	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.274136915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763526	2540133	2539227	276670	275797	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC191.11	php5	inv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577032953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763527	2540133	2540528	276670	277056	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC18H10.04c	php5	sce3	-	tif48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808707501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763528	2540133	2539035	276670	275608	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC794.09c	php5	tef101	-	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.343631128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763529	2540133	2539939	276670	276483	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC11G11.01	php5	fis1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.874623985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763530	2540133	2541104	276670	277619	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC6B1.03c	php5	SPBC6B1.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51350048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763531	2540133	2541117	276670	277632	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC646.13	php5	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779008095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763532	2540133	2542502	276670	278960	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC139.06	php5	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927683621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763533	2540133	2542963	276670	279403	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC1071.03c	php5	sil1	-	SPAC1071.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153173847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763534	2540133	2539944	276670	276488	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC1198.06c	php5	SPBC1198.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.19800919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763535	2540133	2541497	276670	277999	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC7D4.13c	php5	SPAC7D4.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809555296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763536	2540133	2543680	276670	280094	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC4G9.20c	php5	SPAC4G9.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.743530979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763537	2540133	5802945	276670	858083	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC19G12.16c	php5	adg2	-	SPAC23A1.01c|mug46	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.757239347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763538	2540133	2541771	276670	278265	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC23H3.06	php5	apl6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57318907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763539	2540133	2541584	276670	278081	SPBC3B8.02	SPAP32A8.02	php5	SPAP32A8.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866615466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763540	2540133	2542103	276670	278579	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC31G5.11	php5	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.437784316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763541	2540133	2540717	276670	277240	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC577.12	php5	dph6	-	mug71	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872766311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763542	2540133	2540491	276670	277019	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC28E12.04	php5	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.027121576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763543	2540133	2540535	276670	277062	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC215.01	php5	SPBC215.01	-	SPBC3B9.20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.261461526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763544	2540133	2538806	276670	275387	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC1840.09	php5	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.0970372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763545	2540133	3361436	276670	280512	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC1296.01c	php5	SPAC1296.01c	-	SPAC22F3.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.407931946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763546	2540133	2538976	276670	275550	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC1840.04	php5	pca1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.122229343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763547	2540133	2541316	276670	277828	SPBC3B8.02	SPBP19A11.02c	php5	SPBP19A11.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.12805191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763548	2540133	2541200	276670	277714	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC8D2.03c	php5	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.325459339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763549	2540133	2542677	276670	279130	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC26F1.10c	php5	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.906154993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763550	2540133	2541500	276670	278002	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC227.18	php5	lys3	-	SPAC2F7.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98570144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763551	2540133	2542714	276670	279167	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC5H10.06c	php5	adh4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.756085565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763552	2540133	2539235	276670	275805	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC1682.15	php5	mug122	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.416670836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763553	2540133	2543260	276670	279688	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC1002.17c	php5	urg2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.146030137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763554	2540133	2542669	276670	279122	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC29B12.08	php5	clr5	-	SPAC29B12.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.438983069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763555	2540133	2540945	276670	277461	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC342.06c	php5	rtt109	-	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.918347609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763556	2540133	2542555	276670	279012	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC1952.06c	php5	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039986684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763557	2540133	2539117	276670	275689	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC74.06	php5	mak3	-	phk2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.390772427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763558	2540133	2543542	276670	279959	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC823.09c	php5	SPAC823.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640108416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763559	2540133	2540929	276670	277445	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC354.03	php5	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44421638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763560	2540133	2541809	276670	278300	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC22A12.11	php5	dak1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.999146213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763561	2540133	2540463	276670	276991	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC2F12.15c	php5	pfa3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.278172838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763562	2540133	2539895	276670	276441	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC1683.10c	php5	pcl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445540108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763563	2540133	2542165	276670	278641	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC1782.08c	php5	rex3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.145572617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763564	2540133	2540790	276670	277309	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC6B1.05c	php5	atg7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.438466167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763565	2540133	2541323	276670	277835	SPBC3B8.02	SPBP35G2.14	php5	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.329099571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763566	2540133	2540425	276670	276953	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC27.06c	php5	mgr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.720315413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763567	2540133	2542318	276670	278784	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC16C9.05	php5	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.340619119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763568	2540133	2541560	276670	278059	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC24B11.12c	php5	SPAC24B11.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.14986351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763569	2540133	2541527	276670	278027	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC31A2.09c	php5	apm4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.934331802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763570	2540133	2541436	276670	277941	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC11H11.03c	php5	SPAC11H11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.260011889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763571	2540133	2541960	276670	278447	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC6G9.15c	php5	SPAC6G9.15c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.204365626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763572	2540133	2542220	276670	278694	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC1A6.03c	php5	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.746463083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763573	2540133	2539525	276670	276087	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC613.01	php5	SPCC613.01	-	SPCC757.14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.20282461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763574	2540133	2539648	276670	276203	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC1198.08	php5	SPBC1198.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852143515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763575	2540133	2542082	276670	278559	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC29B12.10c	php5	pgt1	-	opt1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.130716634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763576	2540133	2541522	276670	278023	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC23E2.01	php5	fep1	-	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.222592075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763577	2540133	2540714	276670	277237	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC19C2.04c	php5	ubp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.922605636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763578	2540133	2539100	276670	275672	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC330.12c	php5	sdh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.505646139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763579	2540133	2540415	276670	276943	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC30B4.06c	php5	SPBC30B4.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.342880999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763580	2540133	2538700	276670	275285	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC645.13	php5	SPCC645.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321900168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763581	2540133	2541484	276670	277986	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC23D3.12	php5	SPAC23D3.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581550251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763582	2540133	2539381	276670	275947	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC1739.10	php5	mug33	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.271052642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763583	2540133	2538906	276670	275483	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC1259.03	php5	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636810526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763584	2540133	2538845	276670	275426	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC1235.13	php5	ght6	-	meu12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329746454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763585	2540133	2542213	276670	278687	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC3G6.13c	php5	rpl4101	-	rpl41-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318739266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763586	2540133	2540964	276670	277480	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC365.16	php5	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.707331488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763587	2540133	2539310	276670	275877	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC285.17	php5	spp27	-	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.769286293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763588	2540133	2542568	276670	279024	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC1952.02	php5	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775815169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763589	2540133	2540222	276670	276755	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC32F12.03c	php5	gpx1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.263462142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763590	2540133	2542394	276670	278858	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC31G5.12c	php5	maf1	-	n150	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814677977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763591	2540133	2543514	276670	279932	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC4D7.03	php5	pop2	-	sud1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867914811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763592	2540133	2539051	276670	275624	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC1183.11	php5	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.628097052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763593	2540133	2541664	276670	278160	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC2H10.01	php5	SPAC2H10.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.977306901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763594	2540133	2543020	276670	279456	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC10F6.13c	php5	SPAC10F6.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924224813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763595	2540133	2542177	276670	278652	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC17H9.08	php5	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.883767931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763596	2540133	2540631	276670	277157	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC25B2.10	php5	SPBC25B2.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709257177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763597	2540133	2542499	276670	278958	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC1F12.04c	php5	SPAC1F12.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2618953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763598	2540133	2541615	276670	278112	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC27D7.11c	php5	SPAC27D7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.426311658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763599	2540133	2542513	276670	278971	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC1952.05	php5	gcn5	-	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.976238365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763600	2540133	2541982	276670	278467	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC23A1.06c	php5	cmk2	-	mkp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380667269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763601	2540133	2542707	276670	279160	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC25G10.03	php5	zip1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932176262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763602	2540133	2538770	276670	275353	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC1753.02c	php5	git3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.910478573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763603	2540133	2542652	276670	279106	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC1687.15	php5	gsk3	-	skp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511722499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763604	2540133	2539198	276670	275769	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC18.09c	php5	hnt3	-	SPCC18.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873659357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763605	2540133	2543483	276670	279903	SPBC3B8.02	SPAPB2B4.02	php5	grx5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.982988655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763606	2540133	2541038	276670	277553	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC29A10.01	php5	ccr1	-	SPBC365.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.590212471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763607	2540133	2543272	276670	279700	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC1002.07c	php5	ats1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.421565029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763608	2540133	2542866	276670	279311	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC9E9.17c	php5	SPAC9E9.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.206739531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763609	2540133	2538843	276670	275424	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC162.08c	php5	nup211	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934542488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763610	2540133	2540150	276670	276687	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC16E9.14c	php5	zrg17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.450300482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763611	2540133	2542971	276670	279410	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC105.02c	php5	SPAC105.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.059024631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763612	2540133	2542543	276670	279000	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC30D11.11	php5	SPAC30D11.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930489411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763613	2540133	2541578	276670	278075	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC25B8.05	php5	deg1	-	SPAC25B8.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.188380626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763614	2540133	2540886	276670	277403	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC4F6.10	php5	vps901	-	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.063181476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763615	2540133	2541943	276670	278430	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC222.07c	php5	hri2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205589253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763616	2540133	2541258	276670	277772	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC8E4.01c	php5	SPBC8E4.01c	-	SPBP4G3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.380753406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763617	2540133	2542921	276670	279362	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC1093.01	php5	ppr5	-	SPAC12B10.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.40553893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763618	2540133	2539999	276670	276543	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC1734.15	php5	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.156098031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763619	2540133	2541496	276670	277998	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC23D3.09	php5	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.166322162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763620	2540133	2540418	276670	276946	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC27.05	php5	SPBC27.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.718353669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763621	2540133	2539603	276670	276161	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC1289.06c	php5	ppr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.320449789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763622	2540133	2543246	276670	279674	SPBC3B8.02	SPAPB8E5.05	php5	mfm1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.339607713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763623	2540133	2542357	276670	278822	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC1782.07	php5	qcr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.952231465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763624	2540133	2541532	276670	278032	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC2C4.15c	php5	ubx2	-	ucp13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037898207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763625	2540133	2542651	276670	279105	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC24C9.12c	php5	SPAC24C9.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.69324265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763626	2540133	2540086	276670	276624	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC16H5.12c	php5	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506164371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763627	2540133	2543406	276670	279828	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC9.12c	php5	atp12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.905095715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763628	2540133	2540326	276670	276856	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC2G5.06c	php5	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.351820189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763629	2540133	2542526	276670	278984	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC57A7.13	php5	SPAC57A7.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813838266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763630	2540133	2538769	276670	275352	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC126.04c	php5	sgf73	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.429261609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763631	2540133	2542032	276670	278514	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC23C11.04c	php5	pnk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097982994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763632	2540133	2540194	276670	276727	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC1709.09	php5	rrf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.463122383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763633	2540133	2540665	276670	277190	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC83.02c	php5	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.744194127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763634	2540133	2543244	276670	279672	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC6B12.06c	php5	rrg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.809417509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763635	2540133	2542946	276670	279386	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC6F12.03c	php5	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.272153421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763636	2540133	2542976	276670	279414	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC9E9.09c	php5	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.197103406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763637	2540133	2539974	276670	276518	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC32H8.07	php5	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575192235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763638	2540133	2541720	276670	278214	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC23H3.13c	php5	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.46939925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763639	2540133	2540836	276670	277354	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC18H10.19	php5	vps38	-	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2837098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763640	2540133	2540232	276670	276764	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC336.10c	php5	tif512	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.750854687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763641	2540133	2542254	276670	278724	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC30D11.04c	php5	nup124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.684378483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763642	2540133	2542214	276670	278688	SPBC3B8.02	SPACUNK4.11c	php5	mpp6	-	SPACUNK4.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810241783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763643	2540133	2543301	276670	279726	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC977.17	php5	SPAC977.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.249543227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763644	2540133	2542549	276670	279006	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC19A8.11c	php5	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.563181612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763645	2540133	2542519	276670	278977	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC19G12.08	php5	scs7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812524125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763646	2540133	2542919	276670	279360	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC6C3.08	php5	nas6	-	SPAC6C3.08	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.415141627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763647	2540133	2542056	276670	278535	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC6G9.14	php5	SPAC6G9.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037811848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763648	2540133	2542439	276670	278901	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC17A5.08	php5	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.84965659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763649	2540133	2538824	276670	275405	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC1442.14c	php5	hnt1	-	SPCC1442.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924626322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763650	2540133	2539368	276670	275934	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC16A11.07	php5	coq10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.09928542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763651	2540133	2542720	276670	279171	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC25G10.05c	php5	his1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093875568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763652	2540133	2543561	276670	279977	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC922.04	php5	SPAC922.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.145638083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763653	2540133	2542008	276670	278491	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC2G11.07c	php5	ptc3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810021475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763654	2540133	2538708	276670	275292	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC594.01	php5	SPCC594.01	-	SPCC736.16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.378049188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763655	2540133	2541536	276670	278036	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC1071.02	php5	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386405382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763656	2540133	2543224	276670	279652	SPBC3B8.02	SPAPB8E5.10	php5	SPAPB8E5.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455124819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763657	2540133	2540599	276670	277125	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC29A3.10c	php5	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.36211879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763658	2540133	2538828	276670	275409	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC1020.05	php5	SPCC1020.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.547068124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763659	2540133	2540016	276670	276560	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC1773.09c	php5	mug184	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200094241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763660	2540133	2541186	276670	277700	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC725.01	php5	SPBC725.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.768405351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763661	2540133	2540844	276670	277361	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC1921.04c	php5	SPBC1921.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640180598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763662	2540133	2539344	276670	275910	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC1672.09	php5	SPCC1672.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.8662586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763663	2540133	2539711	276670	276264	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC1683.09c	php5	frp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.17555286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763664	2540133	2538884	276670	275462	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC1393.08	php5	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776654273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763665	2540133	2541488	276670	277990	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC227.17c	php5	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.162090417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763666	2540133	2539519	276670	276081	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC364.05	php5	vps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.565572618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763667	2540133	2542973	276670	279412	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC10F6.04	php5	SPAC10F6.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.197823023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763668	2540133	2542602	276670	279056	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC186.09	php5	SPAC186.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.13194795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763669	2540133	2541742	276670	278236	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC22H10.09	php5	SPAC22H10.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.089869773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763670	2540133	2541896	276670	278386	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC23H4.16c	php5	SPAC23H4.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.055387139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763671	2540133	3361520	276670	280596	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC1610.02c	php5	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.020669897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763672	2540133	2540643	276670	277168	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC19G7.06	php5	mbx1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.777679837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763673	2540133	2542875	276670	279320	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC13G7.02c	php5	ssa1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.991919959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763674	2540133	2541713	276670	278208	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC3A12.12	php5	atp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.380534777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763675	2540133	2539763	276670	276314	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC1861.05	php5	SPBC1861.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.507254708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763676	2540133	2540959	276670	277475	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC365.12c	php5	ish1	-	isp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377606474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763677	2540133	2543391	276670	279813	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC4G9.09c	php5	arg11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.381289667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763678	2540133	2541156	276670	277671	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC685.07c	php5	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.13621672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763679	2540133	2540226	276670	276758	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC32H8.08c	php5	omh5	-	pi016|SPACTOKYO_453.20	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03781074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763680	2540133	2539499	276670	276062	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC622.08c	php5	hta1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.974553355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763681	2540133	2543619	276670	280033	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC4F10.04	php5	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453832967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763682	2540133	2539555	276670	276116	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC4B3.08	php5	lsg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.312954281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763683	2540133	2539137	276670	275709	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC1682.08c	php5	mcp2	-	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.054262793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763684	2540133	2541909	276670	278399	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC227.01c	php5	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.674883302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763685	2540133	2542401	276670	278865	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC1142.02c	php5	SPAC1142.02c	-	SPAC17G6.19c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.407728246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763686	2540133	2542881	276670	279326	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC13F5.03c	php5	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.173446933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763687	2540133	2539925	276670	276469	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC16H5.13	php5	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327225365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763688	2540133	2543304	276670	279728	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC6B12.12	php5	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.123443911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763689	2540133	2540960	276670	277476	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC3D6.02	php5	but2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.616428805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763690	2540133	2542940	276670	279381	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC31A2.12	php5	SPAC31A2.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329480762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763691	2540133	2543160	276670	279591	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC31A2.14	php5	bun107	-	wdr48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.264202711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763692	2540133	2541432	276670	277937	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC1F5.05c	php5	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.411497213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763693	2540133	2543066	276670	279499	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC343.12	php5	rds1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.640500521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763694	2540133	2543662	276670	280076	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC9.07c	php5	SPAC9.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.261424357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763695	2540133	2539816	276670	276366	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC12C2.04	php5	SPBC12C2.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712201789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763696	2540133	2541531	276670	278031	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC25A8.01c	php5	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.406236052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763697	2540133	2543329	276670	279752	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC56F8.02	php5	SPAC56F8.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455922982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763698	2540133	2542326	276670	278792	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC16C9.07	php5	pom2	-	SPAC2G11.01|mug189|ppk5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517889624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763699	2540133	2543437	276670	279857	SPBC3B8.02	SPAPB1A10.14	php5	pof15	-	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.080153852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763700	2540133	2541743	276670	278237	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC22H10.13	php5	zym1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.491743393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763701	2540133	2539182	276670	275753	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC16A11.16c	php5	rpn1302	-	rpn13|rpn13b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.343293736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763702	2540133	2543420	276670	279842	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC3H1.04c	php5	mdm31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.722682297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763703	2540133	2540297	276670	276828	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC24C6.08c	php5	bhd1	-	bhd	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.777684009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763704	2540133	2541823	276670	278314	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC23H3.15c	php5	SPAC23H3.15c	-	SPAC25H1.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.409840497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763705	2540133	2542341	276670	278807	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC16E8.17c	php5	SPAC16E8.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645264771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763706	2540133	2543582	276670	279997	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC4H3.06	php5	SPAC4H3.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.206748443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763707	2540133	2543633	276670	280047	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC3H8.05c	php5	mms1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.441039808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763708	2540133	2539736	276670	276288	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC12C2.12c	php5	glo1	-	SPBC21D10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.412047824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763709	2540133	2540333	276670	276863	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC21B10.07	php5	SPBC21B10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.615889867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763710	2540133	2539460	276670	276023	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC4B3.13	php5	SPCC4B3.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569775251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763711	2540133	3361511	276670	280587	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC23C4.08	php5	rho3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149422008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763712	2540133	2542442	276670	278904	SPBC3B8.02	SPACUNK12.02c	php5	cmk1	-	CaMK-I|SPAC25D11.02C	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.353331696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763713	2540133	2540278	276670	276809	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC1A4.04	php5	SPBC1A4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.380506362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763714	2540133	2543124	276670	279556	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC3A11.06	php5	mvp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.347576513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763715	2540133	2539375	276670	275941	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC4G3.11	php5	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.001623441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763716	2540133	2539169	276670	275740	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC1235.11	php5	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.970144956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763717	2540133	2541238	276670	277752	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC8E4.05c	php5	SPBC8E4.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.93416739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763718	2540133	2543387	276670	279809	SPBC3B8.02	SPAPB1E7.02c	php5	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.204599648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763719	2540133	2538854	276670	275435	SPBC3B8.02	SPCP1E11.05c	php5	are2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.023191597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763720	2540133	2542886	276670	279331	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC1486.01	php5	SPAC1486.01	-	sod2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.068732251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763721	2540133	2539531	276670	276093	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC576.02	php5	SPCC576.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812316347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763722	2540133	2543076	276670	279509	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC30C2.07	php5	SPAC30C2.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.986419559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763723	2540133	2542566	276670	279022	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC8C9.12c	php5	SPAC8C9.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508534718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763724	2540133	2541003	276670	277518	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC3E7.16c	php5	leu3	-	SPBC4F6.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.044833668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763725	2540133	2542424	276670	278886	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC1805.14	php5	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.229210439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763726	2540133	2541478	276670	277980	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC2F7.17	php5	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200120976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763727	2540133	2542700	276670	279153	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC26H5.08c	php5	bgl2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.25747714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763728	2540133	2543372	276670	279794	SPBC3B8.02	SPAPB1A10.09	php5	ase1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096788956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763729	2540133	2539976	276670	276520	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC1683.07	php5	mal1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931385306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763730	2540133	2543333	276670	279756	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC694.02	php5	SPAC694.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.326463116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763731	2540133	2538696	276670	275281	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC569.06	php5	SPCC569.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380149003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763732	2540133	2541124	276670	277639	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC646.02	php5	cwf11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932506335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763733	2540133	2541576	276670	278073	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC1348.02	php5	SPBC1348.02	-	SPAC1348.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.289142842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763734	2540133	2540310	276670	276840	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC29B5.04c	php5	SPBC29B5.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.748686036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763735	2540133	2541062	276670	277577	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC660.11	php5	tcg1	-	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.064846597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763736	2540133	2538940	276670	275515	SPBC3B8.02	SPCC1620.07c	php5	lnp1	-	SPCC1620.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924284701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763737	2540133	2541875	276670	278365	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC22F3.06c	php5	lon1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.318277035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763738	2540133	2540787	276670	277306	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC1921.07c	php5	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.040571604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763739	2540133	2540798	276670	277317	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC19C7.01	php5	mni1	-	SPBC32F12.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.920240341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763740	2538965	2540886	275539	277403	SPCC417.09c	SPBC4F6.10	SPCC417.09c	vps901	-	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510664169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763741	2538965	2542235	275539	278707	SPCC417.09c	SPAC18G6.05c	SPCC417.09c	SPAC18G6.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388963781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763742	2538965	2538852	275539	275433	SPCC417.09c	SPCC4E9.01c	SPCC417.09c	rec11	-	SPCC550.16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380809933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763743	2538965	2539293	275539	275861	SPCC417.09c	SPCC553.08c	SPCC417.09c	ria1	-	SPCC553.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.575191733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763744	2538965	2539066	275539	275638	SPCC417.09c	SPCC126.13c	SPCC417.09c	SPCC126.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.3269716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763745	2538965	2541156	275539	277671	SPCC417.09c	SPBC685.07c	SPCC417.09c	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.119319169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763746	2538965	2539030	275539	275603	SPCC417.09c	SPCP1E11.02	SPCC417.09c	ppk38	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.845301541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763747	2538965	2543672	275539	280086	SPCC417.09c	SPAC4H3.01	SPCC417.09c	SPAC4H3.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513693314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763748	2538965	2542908	275539	279352	SPCC417.09c	SPAC13G7.03	SPCC417.09c	upf3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820709943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763749	2542071	2542502	278548	278960	SPAC26H5.03	SPAC139.06	pcf2	hat1	cac2	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.685499308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763750	2542071	2543164	278548	279595	SPAC26H5.03	SPAC3G6.06c	pcf2	rad2	cac2	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51896072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763751	2542071	2539201	278548	275772	SPAC26H5.03	SPCC188.09c	pcf2	pfl4	cac2	SPCC188.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980014585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763752	2542071	2542613	278548	279067	SPAC26H5.03	SPAC18B11.03c	pcf2	SPAC18B11.03c	cac2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.33785005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763753	2542071	2541313	278548	277825	SPAC26H5.03	SPBP26C9.02c	pcf2	car1	cac2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042280115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763754	2542071	2542714	278548	279167	SPAC26H5.03	SPAC5H10.06c	pcf2	adh4	cac2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934851468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763755	2542071	2539575	278548	276135	SPAC26H5.03	SPCP20C8.02c	pcf2	SPCP20C8.02c	cac2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935826097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763756	2542071	2542318	278548	278784	SPAC26H5.03	SPAC16C9.05	pcf2	cph1	cac2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.352123283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763757	2542071	2543685	278548	280099	SPAC26H5.03	SPAC3C7.03c	pcf2	rad55	cac2	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.496678489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763758	2542071	2541388	278548	277899	SPAC26H5.03	SPBP8B7.30c	pcf2	thi5	cac2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.197290499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763759	2542071	2540086	278548	276624	SPAC26H5.03	SPBC16H5.12c	pcf2	SPBC16H5.12c	cac2	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036490231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763760	2542071	2542007	278548	278490	SPAC26H5.03	SPAC20H4.07	pcf2	rad57	cac2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.693381601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763761	2542071	2539481	278548	276044	SPAC26H5.03	SPCC622.16c	pcf2	epe1	cac2	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.282546838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763762	2542071	2539317	278548	275883	SPAC26H5.03	SPCC16A11.08	pcf2	atg20	cac2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152905464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763763	2542071	2541614	278548	278111	SPAC26H5.03	SPAC29A4.20	pcf2	elp3	cac2	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448735838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763764	2542071	2541746	278548	278240	SPAC26H5.03	SPAC20G4.04c	pcf2	hus1	cac2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700079241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763765	2542071	2539812	278548	276362	SPAC26H5.03	SPBC1347.02	pcf2	fkbp39	cac2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.123397916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763766	2542071	2540930	278548	277446	SPAC26H5.03	SPBC354.10	pcf2	def1	cac2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.146766192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763767	2542071	2541370	278548	277881	SPAC26H5.03	SPBP8B7.07c	pcf2	set6	cac2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.507652484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763768	2542071	2540333	278548	276863	SPAC26H5.03	SPBC21B10.07	pcf2	SPBC21B10.07	cac2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.049094583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763769	2542071	2539460	278548	276023	SPAC26H5.03	SPCC4B3.13	pcf2	SPCC4B3.13	cac2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.824883004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763770	2542071	2543387	278548	279809	SPAC26H5.03	SPAPB1E7.02c	pcf2	mcl1	cac2	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699941295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763771	3361477	2543635	280553	280049	SPAC56F8.08	SPAC3H8.03	mud1	img2	ddi1|ucp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570249333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763772	3361477	2541801	280553	278292	SPAC56F8.08	SPAC2F7.08c	mud1	snf5	ddi1|ucp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389271316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763773	3361477	2543638	280553	280052	SPAC56F8.08	SPAC3H8.09c	mud1	nab3	ddi1|ucp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.836775437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763774	3361477	2542516	280553	278974	SPAC56F8.08	SPAC2F7.04	mud1	pmc2	ddi1|ucp1	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699848731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763775	3361477	2542175	280553	278650	SPAC56F8.08	SPAC1F3.02c	mud1	mkh1	ddi1|ucp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378536692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763776	3361477	2543463	280553	279883	SPAC56F8.08	SPAPB21F2.03	mud1	slx9	ddi1|ucp1	SPAPB21F2.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390792221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763777	2542081	2543529	278558	279947	SPAC26H5.04	SPAC4C5.02c	SPAC26H5.04	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930736984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763778	2542081	2543020	278558	279456	SPAC26H5.04	SPAC10F6.13c	SPAC26H5.04	SPAC10F6.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.748154717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763779	2542081	2538873	278558	275452	SPAC26H5.04	SPCC306.11	SPAC26H5.04	SPCC306.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637073912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763780	2542703	2542816	279156	279263	SPAC26H5.06	SPAC4G8.11c	pot1	atp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.933646943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763781	2542703	2541488	279156	277990	SPAC26H5.06	SPAC227.17c	pot1	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.15540811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763782	2542703	2541806	279156	278297	SPAC26H5.06	SPAC4G8.13c	pot1	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.871815046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763783	2539366	2539147	275932	275719	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC622.12c	pef1	gdh1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.509276204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763784	2539366	2539034	275932	275607	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC830.10	pef1	ham1	p31	SPCC830.10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317459546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763785	2539366	2538721	275932	275305	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC1494.10	pef1	adn3	p31	SPCC70.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.028430935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763786	2539366	2539841	275932	276389	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC17D1.05	pef1	SPBC17D1.05	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.505872573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763787	2539366	2539788	275932	276338	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC17D1.02	pef1	dph2	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.818096818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763788	2539366	2541257	275932	277771	SPCC16C4.11	SPBP23A10.14c	pef1	ell1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.850906968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763789	2539366	2540060	275932	276598	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC106.01	pef1	mph1	p31	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.132841563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763790	2539366	2538961	275932	275535	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC285.14	pef1	trs130	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.314802096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763791	2539366	2543529	275932	279947	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC4C5.02c	pef1	ryh1	p31	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.677597307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763792	2539366	2542598	275932	279052	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC6G10.08	pef1	idp1	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.089614856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763793	2539366	2541656	275932	278152	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC25H1.06	pef1	pcf3	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.077204309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763794	2539366	2542080	275932	278557	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC27D7.03c	pef1	mei2	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.056800268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763795	2539366	2539949	275932	276493	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC1703.04	pef1	mlh1	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.267303184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763796	2539366	2542518	275932	278976	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC1B3.16c	pef1	vht1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.3817783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763797	2539366	2541343	275932	277854	SPCC16C4.11	SPBPB2B2.19c	pef1	SPBPB2B2.19c	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.865561055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763798	2539366	2541512	275932	278013	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC11E3.08c	pef1	nse6	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.023268424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763799	2539366	2540913	275932	277429	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC56F2.08c	pef1	SPBC56F2.08c	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778709039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763800	2539366	2542372	275932	278836	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC1F3.03	pef1	SPAC1F3.03	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815158862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763801	2539366	2539452	275932	276015	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC70.03c	pef1	SPCC70.03c	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.97960223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763802	2539366	2540435	275932	276963	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC25B2.03	pef1	SPBC25B2.03	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.400577174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763803	2539366	2542812	275932	279259	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC6F6.01	pef1	cch1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.327526324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763804	2539366	2540956	275932	277472	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC409.06	pef1	uch2	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453355202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763805	2539366	2542706	275932	279159	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC29B12.13	pef1	SPAC29B12.13	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.619652808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763806	2539366	2541818	275932	278309	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC11G7.02	pef1	pub1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.335523381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763807	2539366	2543064	275932	279497	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC3G6.01	pef1	hrp3	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.591750819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763808	2539366	2540131	275932	276668	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC1778.05c	pef1	SPBC1778.05c	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.90766469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763809	2539366	2542787	275932	279236	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC9G1.08c	pef1	SPAC9G1.08c	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.561251635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763810	2539366	2540524	275932	277052	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC21B10.08c	pef1	SPBC21B10.08c	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927365739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763811	2539366	2542358	275932	278823	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC1782.09c	pef1	clp1	p31	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.312202314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763812	2539366	2542293	275932	278761	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC17G8.14c	pef1	pck1	p31	SPAC22H10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.195544513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763813	2539366	2540528	275932	277056	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC18H10.04c	pef1	sce3	p31	tif48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.507706734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763814	2539366	2538985	275932	275559	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC13B11.03c	pef1	SPCC13B11.03c	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153217205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763815	2539366	2543339	275932	279762	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC630.13c	pef1	tsc2	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.004112597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763816	2539366	2538993	275932	275567	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC162.12	pef1	tco89	p31	SPCC1753.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.743491301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763817	2539366	2538896	275932	275474	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC584.11c	pef1	SPCC584.11c	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.123899831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763818	2539366	2539930	275932	276474	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC1198.11c	pef1	reb1	p31	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.282205292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763819	2539366	2541438	275932	277943	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC23G3.10c	pef1	ssr3	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811019075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763820	2539366	2542650	275932	279104	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC2C4.10c	pef1	csc4	p31	SPAC2C4.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.450625033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763821	2539366	2541853	275932	278344	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC2F3.11	pef1	SPAC2F3.11	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.130378921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763822	2539366	2543559	275932	279975	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC664.04c	pef1	rps1602	p31	rps16|rps16-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.562332567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763823	2539366	2540410	275932	276938	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC2D10.04	pef1	SPBC2D10.04	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935135003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763824	2539366	2540296	275932	276827	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC2D10.05	pef1	exg3	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.150584565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763825	2539366	2542224	275932	278697	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC19G12.03	pef1	cda1	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988610014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763826	2539366	2541345	275932	277856	SPCC16C4.11	SPBP35G2.07	pef1	ilv1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.683868699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763827	2539366	2541633	275932	278129	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC664.01c	pef1	swi6	p31	SPAC824.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813608373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763828	2539366	2542546	275932	279003	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC1399.05c	pef1	toe1	p31	SPAC1399.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.568115524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763829	2539366	2540694	275932	277218	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC19C7.10	pef1	bqt4	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.503199244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763830	2539366	2542917	275932	279358	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC9E9.11	pef1	plr1	p31	plr	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.714492368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763831	2539366	2543434	275932	279854	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC8F11.02c	pef1	dph3	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.450638933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763832	2539366	2539201	275932	275772	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC188.09c	pef1	pfl4	p31	SPCC188.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.380200356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763833	2539366	2539890	275932	276436	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC16C6.03c	pef1	SPBC16C6.03c	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.564134987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763834	2539366	2541584	275932	278081	SPCC16C4.11	SPAP32A8.02	pef1	SPAP32A8.02	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517605735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763835	2539366	2542103	275932	278579	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC31G5.11	pef1	pac2	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516159309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763836	2539366	2540717	275932	277240	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC577.12	pef1	dph6	p31	mug71	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.287098594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763837	2539366	2540491	275932	277019	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC28E12.04	pef1	SPBC28E12.04	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.499566371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763838	2539366	2538976	275932	275550	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC1840.04	pef1	pca1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.97995107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763839	2539366	2541361	275932	277872	SPCC16C4.11	SPBP8B7.10c	pef1	utp16	p31	SPBP8B7.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.338963264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763840	2539366	2543098	275932	279530	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC4A8.06c	pef1	SPAC4A8.06c	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037286363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763841	2539366	2540975	275932	277491	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC354.12	pef1	gpd3	p31	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.957582333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763842	2539366	2540015	275932	276559	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC1685.02c	pef1	rps1202	p31	rps12-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.718760716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763843	2539366	2542468	275932	278929	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC1D4.09c	pef1	rtf2	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.455804042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763844	2539366	2542107	275932	278583	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC30.01c	pef1	sec72	p31	sec7b|sec702	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.020980836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763845	2539366	2541208	275932	277722	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC887.04c	pef1	lub1	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.558777581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763846	2539366	2541012	275932	277527	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC3H7.12	pef1	rav2	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38295805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763847	2539366	2540979	275932	277495	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC3H7.10	pef1	elp6	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.184644412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763848	2539366	2542273	275932	278742	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC17H9.13c	pef1	SPAC17H9.13c	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.631248305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763849	2539366	2541058	275932	277573	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC3H7.09	pef1	erf2	p31	mug142	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.933051362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763850	2539366	2541498	275932	278000	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC227.10	pef1	SPAC227.10	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874040136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763851	2539366	2539913	275932	276457	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC11G11.03	pef1	mrt4	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.823739981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763852	2539366	2542714	275932	279167	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC5H10.06c	pef1	adh4	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326868708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763853	2539366	2539564	275932	276125	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC550.12	pef1	arp6	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.269952087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763854	2539366	2539264	275932	275834	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC550.10	pef1	atd3	p31	meu8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326048379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763855	2539366	2539045	275932	275618	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC1235.05c	pef1	fft2	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.381692584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763856	2539366	2539249	275932	275819	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC1450.05c	pef1	rox3	p31	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441644437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763857	2539366	2540919	275932	277435	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC543.07	pef1	pek1	p31	mkk1|skh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.154466288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763858	2539366	2540945	275932	277461	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC342.06c	pef1	rtt109	p31	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.982891792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763859	2539366	2539434	275932	275997	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC757.09c	pef1	rnc1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.388039735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763860	2539366	2543453	275932	279873	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC3G9.03	pef1	rpl2301	p31	rpl23-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.64012619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763861	2539366	2542555	275932	279012	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC1952.06c	pef1	SPAC1952.06c	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511354697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763862	2539366	2539797	275932	276347	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC16G5.14c	pef1	rps3	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.089177437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763863	2539366	2539575	275932	276135	SPCC16C4.11	SPCP20C8.02c	pef1	SPCP20C8.02c	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.84336236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763864	2539366	2543048	275932	279483	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC3F10.02c	pef1	trk1	p31	sptrk	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.499102599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763865	2539366	2541119	275932	277634	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC651.11c	pef1	apm3	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.622585116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763866	2539366	3361385	275932	280461	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC1639.02c	pef1	trk2	p31	SPAC1F5.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.878084916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763867	2539366	2541811	275932	278302	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC22A12.16	pef1	SPAC22A12.16	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985677205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763868	2539366	2542012	275932	278495	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC23C11.02c	pef1	rps23	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.569070955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763869	2539366	2540463	275932	276991	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC2F12.15c	pef1	pfa3	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.496595753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763870	2539366	2541669	275932	278165	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC22G7.07c	pef1	ime4	p31	SPAC22G7.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.030798808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763871	2539366	2541998	275932	278482	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC23A1.09	pef1	SPAC23A1.09	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.751432034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763872	2539366	2540727	275932	277250	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC1921.03c	pef1	mex67	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09363157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763873	2539366	2542022	275932	278505	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC23A1.03	pef1	apt1	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926061921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763874	2539366	2542165	275932	278641	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC1782.08c	pef1	rex3	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979017153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763875	2539366	2542318	275932	278784	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC16C9.05	pef1	cph1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.096643432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763876	2539366	2542023	275932	278506	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC20H4.10	pef1	ufd2	p31	SPAC145.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581721775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763877	2539366	2542277	275932	278746	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC17A5.02c	pef1	dbr1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.067231439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763878	2539366	2539792	275932	276342	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC1271.14	pef1	SPBC1271.14	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.080930846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763879	2539366	2540467	275932	276995	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC2G2.07c	pef1	mug178	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505320545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763880	2539366	2543110	275932	279542	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC56E4.06c	pef1	ggt2	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390816879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763881	2539366	2540851	275932	277368	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC4F6.04	pef1	rpl2502	p31	rpl23a-2|rpl25b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.918026532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763882	2539366	2540595	275932	277121	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC21C3.02c	pef1	dep1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.279904584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763883	2539366	2542698	275932	279151	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC26H5.09c	pef1	SPAC26H5.09c	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.408848233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763884	2539366	2541580	275932	278077	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC1687.05	pef1	pli1	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090775244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763885	2539366	2542649	275932	279103	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC24C9.14	pef1	otu1	p31	mug141	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.894831706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763886	2539366	2539129	275932	275701	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC338.14	pef1	ado1	p31	SPCC338.14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.974082673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763887	2539366	2541105	275932	277620	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC685.02	pef1	exo5	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.023631947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763888	2539366	2539648	275932	276203	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC1198.08	pef1	SPBC1198.08	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.843584153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763889	2539366	2543563	275932	279979	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC664.02c	pef1	arp8	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.567530343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763890	2539366	2538698	275932	275283	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC1442.02	pef1	SPCC1442.02	p31	SPCC1450.18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.261289998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763891	2539366	2541522	275932	278023	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC23E2.01	pef1	fep1	p31	gaf2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09132104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763892	2539366	2541004	275932	277519	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC3F6.01c	pef1	SPBC3F6.01c	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.988834261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763893	2539366	2540714	275932	277237	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC19C2.04c	pef1	ubp11	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092931751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763894	2539366	2543426	275932	279846	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC631.02	pef1	bdf2	p31	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.881570129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763895	2539366	2539352	275932	275918	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC188.07	pef1	ccq1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.210413693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763896	2539366	2543078	275932	279511	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC31A2.15c	pef1	dcc1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.617638793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763897	2539366	2538700	275932	275285	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC645.13	pef1	SPCC645.13	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635989204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763898	2539366	2539980	275932	276524	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC1773.14	pef1	arg7	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867945634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763899	2539366	2542253	275932	278723	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC17H9.04c	pef1	SPAC17H9.04c	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.466324392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763900	2539366	2542981	275932	279419	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC824.02	pef1	bst1	p31	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.569828774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763901	2539366	2540825	275932	277343	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC428.08c	pef1	clr4	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.978530174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763902	2539366	2541926	275932	278414	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC222.14c	pef1	SPAC222.14c	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.146540919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763903	2539366	2540893	275932	277409	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC543.10	pef1	get1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.234232539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763904	2539366	2540964	275932	277480	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC365.16	pef1	SPBC365.16	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.631542889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763905	2539366	2542554	275932	279011	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC1952.03	pef1	otu2	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147172461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763906	2539366	2542568	275932	279024	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC1952.02	pef1	tma23	p31	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.542840745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763907	2539366	2543573	275932	279988	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC869.11	pef1	cat1	p31	SPAC922.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517448723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763908	2539366	2542239	275932	278711	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC18G6.02c	pef1	chp1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.638568914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763909	2539366	2539467	275932	276030	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC417.07c	pef1	mto1	p31	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2067138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763910	2539366	3361461	275932	280537	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC11H11.01	pef1	sst6	p31	cps23	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.567572279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763911	2539366	2539705	275932	276258	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC1105.10	pef1	rav1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.695687825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763912	2539366	2542950	275932	279390	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC12B10.03	pef1	bun62	p31	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.742031267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763913	2539366	2539870	275932	276416	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC1709.18	pef1	tif452	p31	SPBC409.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.064436539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763914	2539366	2541392	275932	277902	SPCC16C4.11	SPBPB10D8.04c	pef1	SPBPB10D8.04c	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810680683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763915	2539366	2542964	275932	279404	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC12G12.07c	pef1	SPAC12G12.07c	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.785887344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763916	2539366	2541801	275932	278292	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC2F7.08c	pef1	snf5	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.960112374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763917	2539366	2538715	275932	275299	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC1223.05c	pef1	rpl3702	p31	rpl37|rpl37-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.485321092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763918	2539366	2543102	275932	279534	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC31G5.21	pef1	SPAC31G5.21	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.131492499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763919	2539366	2541250	275932	277764	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC8D2.17	pef1	gmh4	p31	SPBC8D2.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099224336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763920	2539366	2543375	275932	279797	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC3H1.08c	pef1	SPAC3H1.08c	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.404040783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763921	2539366	2540892	275932	277408	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC530.01	pef1	gyp1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.463943099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763922	2539366	2541776	275932	278270	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC23H3.05c	pef1	swd1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.09746067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763923	2539366	2541093	275932	277608	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC646.08c	pef1	SPBC646.08c	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.91044218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763924	2539366	2543144	275932	279576	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC3F10.05c	pef1	mug113	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.409119763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763925	2539366	2543385	275932	279807	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC4G9.12	pef1	SPAC4G9.12	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444877504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763926	2539366	2543593	275932	280008	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC4G9.10	pef1	arg3	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.559713689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763927	2539366	2539845	275932	276393	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC12C2.02c	pef1	ste20	p31	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.450325261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763928	2539366	2543445	275932	279865	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC4F10.13c	pef1	mpd2	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.22444429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763929	2539366	2542249	275932	278719	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC30D11.14c	pef1	SPAC30D11.14c	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.949331885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763930	2539366	2538770	275932	275353	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC1753.02c	pef1	git3	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.498953902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763931	2539366	2540647	275932	277172	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC18H10.07	pef1	SPBC18H10.07	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.067344337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763932	2539366	2543483	275932	279903	SPCC16C4.11	SPAPB2B4.02	pef1	grx5	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.7678526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763933	2539366	2540338	275932	276867	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC2G2.13c	pef1	dcd1	p31	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.806376263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763934	2539366	2540546	275932	277073	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC25B2.06c	pef1	btb2	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.485824206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763935	2539366	2538706	275932	275290	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC338.08	pef1	ctp1	p31	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.316413324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763936	2539366	2542507	275932	278965	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC18G6.13	pef1	SPAC18G6.13	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.332437489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763937	2539366	2540987	275932	277503	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC36B7.05c	pef1	SPBC36B7.05c	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.866216854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763938	2539366	2542699	275932	279152	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC5H10.07	pef1	SPAC5H10.07	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872648807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763939	2539366	2541543	275932	278043	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC5H10.04	pef1	SPAC5H10.04	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.404922521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763940	2539366	2540352	275932	276881	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC215.03c	pef1	csn1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.555250794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763941	2539366	2543412	275932	279834	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC637.07	pef1	moe1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.488758966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763942	2539366	2539733	275932	276285	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC16E9.12c	pef1	pab2	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.190571819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763943	2539366	2540150	275932	276687	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC16E9.14c	pef1	zrg17	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.129297686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763944	2539366	2538800	275932	275381	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC1322.06	pef1	kap113	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.936087686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763945	2539366	2541578	275932	278075	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC25B8.05	pef1	deg1	p31	SPAC25B8.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.896789852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763946	2539366	2542235	275932	278707	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC18G6.05c	pef1	SPAC18G6.05c	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.815494694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763947	2539366	2543313	275932	279737	SPCC16C4.11	SPAPJ691.03	pef1	SPAPJ691.03	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.20531985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763948	2539366	2541183	275932	277697	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC725.14	pef1	arg6	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.432310047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763949	2539366	2539603	275932	276161	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC1289.06c	pef1	ppr8	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.84255504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763950	2539366	2539689	275932	276244	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC1861.03	pef1	mak10	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.868984895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763951	2539366	2541929	275932	278417	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC23C4.12	pef1	hhp2	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453116255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763952	2539366	2542860	275932	279306	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC8C9.09c	pef1	mug129	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378896626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763953	2539366	2540452	275932	276980	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC2A9.11c	pef1	iss9	p31	SPBC2A9.11c|SPBC2D10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.842950985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763954	2539366	2542651	275932	279105	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC24C9.12c	pef1	SPAC24C9.12c	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.558591531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763955	2539366	2543643	275932	280057	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC3G9.07c	pef1	hos2	p31	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.762013662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763956	2539366	2541899	275932	278389	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC22E12.11c	pef1	set3	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.67215517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763957	2539366	2539586	275932	276145	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC70.08c	pef1	SPCC70.08c	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699521103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763958	2539366	2540086	275932	276624	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC16H5.12c	pef1	SPBC16H5.12c	p31	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.816141242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763959	2539366	2540231	275932	276763	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC336.14c	pef1	ppk26	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.619767419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763960	2539366	2540538	275932	277065	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC26H8.03	pef1	cho2	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044366533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763961	2539366	2541351	275932	277862	SPCC16C4.11	SPBP4H10.14c	pef1	SPBP4H10.14c	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981604936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763962	2539366	2542526	275932	278984	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC57A7.13	pef1	SPAC57A7.13	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.045326852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763963	2539366	2541187	275932	277701	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC776.14	pef1	plh1	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979401582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763964	2539366	2538769	275932	275352	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC126.04c	pef1	sgf73	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.116070646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763965	2539366	2539667	275932	276222	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC13G1.08c	pef1	ash2	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.597625928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763966	2539366	2541830	275932	278321	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC5H10.01	pef1	SPAC5H10.01	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771814552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763967	2539366	2542528	275932	278986	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC1B3.08	pef1	SPAC1B3.08	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.681844929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763968	2539366	2542874	275932	279319	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC20H4.09	pef1	SPAC20H4.09	p31	SPAC145.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.163678382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763969	2539366	2540997	275932	277513	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC3H7.06c	pef1	pof9	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.985992734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763970	2539366	2542946	275932	279386	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC6F12.03c	pef1	fsv1	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987129032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763971	2539366	2541607	275932	278104	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC24B11.10c	pef1	cfh1	p31	chr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390231905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763972	2539366	3361569	275932	280645	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC186.04c	pef1	SPAC186.04c	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814222383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763973	2539366	2538818	275932	275399	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC645.12c	pef1	SPCC645.12c	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.766795058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763974	2539366	2540961	275932	277477	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC36B7.03	pef1	sec63	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.122359886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763975	2539366	2541542	275932	278042	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC4G9.02	pef1	rnh201	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145571965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763976	2539366	2541720	275932	278214	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC23H3.13c	pef1	gpa2	p31	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.185528004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763977	2539366	2541903	275932	278393	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC22F8.05	pef1	SPAC22F8.05	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.169453267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763978	2539366	2540077	275932	276615	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC17D11.04c	pef1	nto1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.688212378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763979	2539366	2540232	275932	276764	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC336.10c	pef1	tif512	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.685234514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763980	2539366	2542431	275932	278893	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC1A6.01c	pef1	SPAC1A6.01c	p31	SPAC23C4.20c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.026657919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763981	2539366	2543301	275932	279726	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC977.17	pef1	SPAC977.17	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153251888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763982	2539366	2540318	275932	276848	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC30B4.04c	pef1	sol1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.981826596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763983	2539366	2542549	275932	279006	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC19A8.11c	pef1	SPAC19A8.11c	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.324314743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763984	2539366	2539408	275932	275973	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC576.12c	pef1	mhf2	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.199087309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763985	2539366	2540776	275932	277296	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC428.07	pef1	meu6	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.695341808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763986	2539366	5802861	275932	857999	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC1D4.01	pef1	tls1	p31	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.360260331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763987	2539366	2539953	275932	276497	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC1709.11c	pef1	png2	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.883915525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763988	2539366	2542439	275932	278901	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC17A5.08	pef1	erp2	p31	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.477653645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763989	2539366	2542010	275932	278493	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC20H4.05c	pef1	SPAC20H4.05c	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.272422941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763990	2539366	2541041	275932	277556	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC3D6.13c	pef1	pdi3	p31	pdi2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323606358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763991	2539366	2541389	275932	277900	SPCC16C4.11	SPBPB2B2.09c	pef1	SPBPB2B2.09c	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.48786734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763992	2539366	2542720	275932	279171	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC25G10.05c	pef1	his1	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.463426641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763993	2539366	2543561	275932	279977	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC922.04	pef1	SPAC922.04	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.982626859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763994	2539366	2538780	275932	275361	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC1840.07c	pef1	SPCC1840.07c	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.466204536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763995	2539366	2540201	275932	276734	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC13A2.04c	pef1	ptr2	p31	SPBC13A2.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864585841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763996	2539366	2541708	275932	278203	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC31A2.02	pef1	trm112	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.06422905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763997	2539366	2542960	275932	279400	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC1039.04	pef1	SPAC1039.04	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.769364669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763998	2539366	2540180	275932	276713	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC16D10.11c	pef1	rps1801	p31	rps18-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.722120402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
763999	2539366	2542597	275932	279051	SPCC16C4.11	SPAP8A3.07c	pef1	SPAP8A3.07c	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.442050534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764000	2539366	3361470	275932	280546	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC3G9.01	pef1	nsk1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.867801998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764001	2539366	2539427	275932	275992	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC663.15c	pef1	SPCC663.15c	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.818703792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764002	2539366	2541266	275932	277780	SPCC16C4.11	SPBP16F5.05c	pef1	yar1	p31	SPBP16F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.976150589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764003	2539366	2541186	275932	277700	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC725.01	pef1	SPBC725.01	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.838045067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764004	2539366	2540844	275932	277361	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC1921.04c	pef1	SPBC1921.04c	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.477830445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764005	2539366	2539059	275932	275632	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC737.06c	pef1	SPCC737.06c	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.98033692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764006	2539366	3361030	275932	280106	SPCC16C4.11	SPCP20C8.03	pef1	SPCP20C8.03	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.508872982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764007	2539366	2542255	275932	278725	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC57A7.08	pef1	pzh1	p31	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572232031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764008	2539366	2538839	275932	275420	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC338.18	pef1	SPCC338.18	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390591143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764009	2539366	2541746	275932	278240	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC20G4.04c	pef1	hus1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.646595277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764010	2539366	2539349	275932	275915	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC613.11c	pef1	meu23	p31	B13958-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.946907492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764011	2539366	2539993	275932	276537	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC1105.05	pef1	exg1	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.263251915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764012	2539366	2539812	275932	276362	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC1347.02	pef1	fkbp39	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.236809908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764013	2539366	2540193	275932	276726	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC1289.10c	pef1	adn2	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.369985641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764014	2539366	2541378	275932	277889	SPCC16C4.11	SPBP8B7.21	pef1	ubp3	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.551192458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764015	2539366	2542781	275932	279230	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC57A10.12c	pef1	ura3	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.717941995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764016	2539366	2539527	275932	276089	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC338.16	pef1	pof3	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.260058194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764017	2539366	2541742	275932	278236	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC22H10.09	pef1	SPAC22H10.09	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326455805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764018	2539366	2541793	275932	278284	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC22H10.02	pef1	SPAC22H10.02	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455395157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764019	2539366	2542453	275932	278914	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC186.01	pef1	pfl9	p31	SPAC186.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.226008536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764020	2539366	2541963	275932	278449	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC21E11.04	pef1	aca1	p31	ppr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818774612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764021	2539366	2541896	275932	278386	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC23H4.16c	pef1	SPAC23H4.16c	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.984449046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764022	2539366	3361520	275932	280596	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC1610.02c	pef1	SPAC1610.02c	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.973057129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764023	2539366	2541017	275932	277532	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC36.07	pef1	elp1	p31	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.558682238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764024	2539366	2542181	275932	278656	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC29E6.05c	pef1	mxr1	p31	SPAC29E6.05c|MsrA|SPAC30.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.275671585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764025	2539366	2542673	275932	279126	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC26A3.11	pef1	SPAC26A3.11	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.597375381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764026	2539366	2541762	275932	278256	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC139.01c	pef1	SPAC139.01c	p31	SPAC955.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.460226279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764027	2539366	2542875	275932	279320	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC13G7.02c	pef1	ssa1	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.972390537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764028	2539366	2540821	275932	277339	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC800.03	pef1	clr3	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318405192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764029	2539366	2540001	275932	276545	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC1289.13c	pef1	gmh6	p31	SPBC1289.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875711594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764030	2539366	2542170	275932	278645	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC17G8.13c	pef1	mst2	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.058303657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764031	2539366	2539631	275932	276187	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC16G5.16	pef1	SPBC16G5.16	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.369096765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764032	2539366	2539706	275932	276259	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC16G5.13	pef1	ptf2	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.910815173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764033	2539366	2540910	275932	277426	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC577.02	pef1	rpl3801	p31	rpl38-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.973295087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764034	2539366	2542806	275932	279254	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC1610.01	pef1	saf5	p31	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.721292376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764035	2539366	2543113	275932	279545	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC3F10.07c	pef1	erf4	p31	mug91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.205155226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764036	2539366	2543391	275932	279813	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC4G9.09c	pef1	arg11	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.118475116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764037	2539366	2539748	275932	276300	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC11C11.01	pef1	SPBC11C11.01	p31	SPBC17D1.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.768211833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764038	2539366	2539354	275932	275920	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC4F11.03c	pef1	SPCC4F11.03c	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.562137614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764039	2539366	2540862	275932	277379	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC4C3.06	pef1	syp1	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462109903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764040	2539366	2541370	275932	277881	SPCC16C4.11	SPBP8B7.07c	pef1	set6	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.333185301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764041	2539366	2543628	275932	280042	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC3H8.10	pef1	spo20	p31	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.483781923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764042	2539366	2542327	275932	278793	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC16C9.06c	pef1	upf1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.317903788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764043	2539366	2541175	275932	277689	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC839.13c	pef1	rpl1601	p31	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984006436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764044	2539366	2543567	275932	279983	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC890.03	pef1	ppk16	p31	mug92	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708399361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764045	2539366	2540498	275932	277026	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC27.02c	pef1	ask1	p31	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.155580447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764046	2539366	2542883	275932	279328	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC1486.04c	pef1	alm1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.497346859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764047	2539366	2542401	275932	278865	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC1142.02c	pef1	SPAC1142.02c	p31	SPAC17G6.19c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.836435788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764048	2539366	2543674	275932	280088	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC637.13c	pef1	slm1	p31	SPAC637.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143044535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764049	2539366	2539925	275932	276469	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC16H5.13	pef1	SPBC16H5.13	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709754214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764050	2539366	2539600	275932	276158	SPCC16C4.11	SPCP1E11.03	pef1	mug170	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.191888909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764051	2539366	2540800	275932	277319	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC409.20c	pef1	psh3	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.832324185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764052	2539366	2542541	275932	278998	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC1B3.03c	pef1	wis2	p31	cyp5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.875691803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764053	2539366	2538966	275932	275540	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC18.10	pef1	SPCC18.10	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.132503836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764054	2539366	2540998	275932	277514	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC3D6.05	pef1	ptp4	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386310837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764055	2539366	2539246	275932	275816	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC18.13	pef1	SPCC18.13	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.941331521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764056	2539366	2540531	275932	277059	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC23E6.08	pef1	sat1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.468354112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764057	2539366	2538962	275932	275536	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC965.13	pef1	SPCC965.13	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.290591057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764058	2539366	2541279	275932	277792	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC8E4.03	pef1	SPBC8E4.03	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.338547993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764059	2539366	2541376	275932	277887	SPCC16C4.11	SPBP8B7.04	pef1	mug45	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.714013368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764060	2539366	2540115	275932	276652	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC1778.02	pef1	rap1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.149996489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764061	2539366	3361193	275932	280269	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC19G7.18c	pef1	SPBC19G7.18c	p31	SPBC19G7.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809895989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764062	2539366	2543077	275932	279510	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC806.04c	pef1	SPAC806.04c	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.515904966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764063	2539366	2541531	275932	278031	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC25A8.01c	pef1	fft3	p31	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.112114982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764064	2539366	2540346	275932	276875	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC2F12.03c	pef1	ebs1	p31	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.624392067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764065	2539366	2541470	275932	277972	SPCC16C4.11	SPAPYUG7.04c	pef1	rpb9	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.330456778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764066	2539366	2540304	275932	276834	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC354.13	pef1	rga6	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.3216891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764067	2539366	2541678	275932	278174	SPCC16C4.11	SPAP7G5.05	pef1	rpl1002	p31	rpl10|rpl10-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.388466851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764068	2539366	2540699	275932	277223	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC800.08	pef1	gcd10	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.069657694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764069	2539366	2540829	275932	277347	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC800.09	pef1	sum2	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.560781469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764070	2539366	2540000	275932	276544	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC1683.13c	pef1	cha4	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.558250269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764071	2539366	2543329	275932	279752	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC56F8.02	pef1	SPAC56F8.02	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445378425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764072	2539366	2539136	275932	275708	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC1919.05	pef1	SPCC1919.05	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.770859747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764073	2539366	2542418	275932	278881	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC1805.07c	pef1	dad2	p31	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.202289587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764074	2539366	2538692	275932	275277	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC162.04c	pef1	wtf13	p31	wtf12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8679348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764075	2539366	2543091	275932	279524	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC12G12.15	pef1	sif3	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.460026867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764076	2539366	2539772	275932	276323	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC1734.05c	pef1	spf31	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.658935229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764077	2539366	2543439	275932	279859	SPCC16C4.11	SPAPB1A10.13	pef1	SPAPB1A10.13	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867504378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764078	2539366	2542222	275932	278695	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC31G5.18c	pef1	sde2	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.990219122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764079	2539366	2540629	275932	277155	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC21D10.09c	pef1	rkr1	p31	SPBC21D10.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81450368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764080	2539366	2539327	275932	275893	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC1442.13c	pef1	SPCC1442.13c	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.980298673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764081	2539366	2539668	275932	276223	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC11B10.10c	pef1	pht1	p31	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.100987004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764082	2539366	2542133	275932	278609	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC1687.19c	pef1	qtr1	p31	SPAC1687.19c|qtrt1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.411611824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764083	2539366	2541789	275932	278281	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC23H4.08	pef1	iwr1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.393959767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764084	2539366	2542635	275932	279089	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC24H6.09	pef1	gef1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32083438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764085	2539366	2539488	275932	276051	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC645.08c	pef1	snd1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444135762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764086	2539366	2540927	275932	277443	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC365.06	pef1	pmt3	p31	smt3|ubl2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.76856445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764087	2539366	2540422	275932	276950	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC27.08c	pef1	sua1	p31	SPBC28F2.01c|asp1|met3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098859337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764088	2539366	2539702	275932	276255	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC1604.12	pef1	SPBC1604.12	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.973214911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764089	2539366	3361117	275932	280193	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC663.17	pef1	wtf15	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864665237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764090	2539366	2540563	275932	277090	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC25H2.09	pef1	SPBC25H2.09	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038991013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764091	2539366	2539726	275932	276278	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC13E7.08c	pef1	leo1	p31	SPBC13E7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.776816333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764092	2539366	3361511	275932	280587	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC23C4.08	pef1	rho3	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.448470515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764093	2539366	2542607	275932	279061	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC18B11.02c	pef1	SPAC18B11.02c	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.561811937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764094	2539366	2539920	275932	276464	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC119.08	pef1	pmk1	p31	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.401298731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764095	2539366	2540896	275932	277412	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC19C2.13c	pef1	ctu2	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640569561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764096	2539366	2540551	275932	277078	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC23E6.01c	pef1	cxr1	p31	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.075282057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764097	2539366	2543380	275932	279802	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC4G9.16c	pef1	rpl901	p31	rpl9-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.922650019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764098	2539366	2540146	275932	276683	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC17A3.06	pef1	SPBC17A3.06	p31	pi040	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.339082269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764099	2539366	2543095	275932	279527	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC4A8.03c	pef1	ptc4	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.021831936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764100	2539366	2541941	275932	278428	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC20H4.03c	pef1	tfs1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.021873447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764101	2539366	2542244	275932	278714	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC19G12.13c	pef1	poz1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.232721351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764102	2539366	2542021	275932	278504	SPCC16C4.11	SPAP14E8.02	pef1	tos4	p31	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321664437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764103	2539366	2541539	275932	278039	SPCC16C4.11	SPAP27G11.12	pef1	SPAP27G11.12	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713470183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764104	2539366	2539037	275932	275610	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC330.07c	pef1	SPCC330.07c	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514687268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764105	2539366	2543370	275932	279792	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC630.07c	pef1	SPAC630.07c	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.878087807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764106	2539366	2541238	275932	277752	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC8E4.05c	pef1	SPBC8E4.05c	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.356676806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764107	2539366	2539700	275932	276253	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC1685.15c	pef1	klp6	p31	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.88362609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764108	2539366	2543400	275932	279822	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC3G9.11c	pef1	SPAC3G9.11c	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.513284853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764109	2539366	2541357	275932	277868	SPCC16C4.11	SPBPB7E8.01	pef1	SPBPB7E8.01	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.809985756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764110	2539366	2541806	275932	278297	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC4G8.13c	pef1	prz1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.622737696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764111	2539366	2543387	275932	279809	SPCC16C4.11	SPAPB1E7.02c	pef1	mcl1	p31	slr3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.617713164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764112	2539366	2543327	275932	279750	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC1D4.06c	pef1	csk1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.90344926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764113	2539366	2542159	275932	278635	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC1834.09	pef1	mug51	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.43339886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764114	2539366	2539531	275932	276093	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC576.02	pef1	SPCC576.02	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.008331591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764115	2539366	2543076	275932	279509	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC30C2.07	pef1	SPAC30C2.07	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035623155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764116	2539366	2540314	275932	276844	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC2G5.03	pef1	ctu1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.411401937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764117	2539366	2542795	275932	279243	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC9G1.05	pef1	aip1	p31	SPAC9G1.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.968029379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764118	2539366	2540360	275932	276889	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC2G5.01	pef1	SPBC2G5.01	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867129308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764119	2539366	2539743	275932	276295	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC16A3.08c	pef1	oga1	p31	SPBC16A3.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.777980511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764120	2539366	2542424	275932	278886	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC1805.14	pef1	SPAC1805.14	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.794453315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764121	2539366	2541867	275932	278357	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC22E12.14c	pef1	sck2	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.348697818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764122	2539366	2541050	275932	277565	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC428.05c	pef1	arg12	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.00986458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764123	2539366	2542700	275932	279153	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC26H5.08c	pef1	bgl2	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.127089678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764124	2539366	2543372	275932	279794	SPCC16C4.11	SPAPB1A10.09	pef1	ase1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.389862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764125	2539366	2543333	275932	279756	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC694.02	pef1	SPAC694.02	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.907846166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764126	2539366	2538834	275932	275415	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC126.08c	pef1	SPCC126.08c	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.16284797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764127	2539366	2543448	275932	279868	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC3H5.07	pef1	rpl702	p31	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.823674709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764128	2539366	2540383	275932	276912	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC31E1.02c	pef1	pmr1	p31	cps5|pgak2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568394251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764129	2539366	2542440	275932	278902	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC17A2.12	pef1	rrp1	p31	SPAC17A2.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.272488939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764130	2539366	2540309	275932	276839	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC21B10.13c	pef1	yox1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.275539114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764131	2539366	2541124	275932	277639	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC646.02	pef1	cwf11	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.773999881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764132	2539366	2540067	275932	276605	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC16H5.05c	pef1	cyp7	p31	cwf27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.192372746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764133	2539366	2541272	275932	277786	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC947.03c	pef1	naa38	p31	mak31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.138556086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764134	2539366	2543472	275932	279892	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC959.04c	pef1	omh6	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.877415524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764135	2539366	2542561	275932	279017	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC31G5.17c	pef1	rps1001	p31	rps10-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811355754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764136	2539366	2543646	275932	280060	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC821.07c	pef1	moc3	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.811029031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764137	2539366	2543501	275932	279919	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC664.14	pef1	amt2	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981412857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764138	2539366	2539738	275932	276290	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC17G9.09	pef1	tif213	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.053544266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764139	2539366	2540320	275932	276850	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC3D6.04c	pef1	mad1	p31	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978552379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764140	2539366	2542836	275932	279282	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC13G7.06	pef1	met16	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.76636115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764141	2539366	2539033	275932	275606	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC1450.07c	pef1	dao1	p31	SPCC1450.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.258828348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764142	2539366	2539001	275932	275575	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC1494.08c	pef1	SPCC1494.08c	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987626083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764143	2539366	2540649	275932	277174	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC19F8.08	pef1	rps401	p31	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.491598982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764144	2539366	2540736	275932	277259	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC19F8.02	pef1	SPBC19F8.02	p31	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.260019757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764145	2542418	2538939	278881	275514	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC1672.04c	dad2	SPCC1672.04c	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.561079426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764146	2542418	2542207	278881	278682	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC17H9.10c	dad2	ddb1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.23092488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764147	2542418	2539050	278881	275623	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC11E10.08	dad2	rik1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.130651078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764148	2542418	2539788	278881	276338	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC17D1.02	dad2	dph2	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872458364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764149	2542418	2540060	278881	276598	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC106.01	dad2	mph1	hos2	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.107700834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764150	2542418	2539405	278881	275970	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC553.03	dad2	pex1	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.454272178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764151	2542418	2542585	278881	279040	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC31A2.13c	dad2	sft1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5156249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764152	2542418	2539949	278881	276493	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC1703.04	dad2	mlh1	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.945254394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764153	2542418	2542518	278881	278976	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC1B3.16c	dad2	vht1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.617851792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764154	2542418	2543634	278881	280048	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC3H8.04	dad2	SPAC3H8.04	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040430353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764155	2542418	2541985	278881	278470	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC20G8.04c	dad2	SPAC20G8.04c	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568154145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764156	2542418	2542066	278881	278543	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC227.05	dad2	SPAC227.05	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.172916978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764157	2542418	2541912	278881	278402	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC222.16c	dad2	csn3	hos2	SPAC821.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.464843727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764158	2542418	2543291	278881	279716	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC9E9.04	dad2	SPAC9E9.04	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.508006279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764159	2542418	2541818	278881	278309	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC11G7.02	dad2	pub1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.911533075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764160	2542418	2542358	278881	278823	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC1782.09c	dad2	clp1	hos2	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.243829159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764161	2542418	2543524	278881	279942	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC4D7.07c	dad2	csi2	hos2	SPAC4D7.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.617499924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764162	2542418	2540528	278881	277056	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC18H10.04c	dad2	sce3	hos2	tif48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.937129504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764163	2542418	2540198	278881	276731	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC1709.04c	dad2	cyp3	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.897151455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764164	2542418	2542237	278881	278709	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC19E9.02	dad2	fin1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.098933446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764165	2542418	2539930	278881	276474	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC1198.11c	dad2	reb1	hos2	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.787620421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764166	2542418	3361561	278881	280637	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC11E3.01c	dad2	swr1	hos2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.359802372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764167	2542418	2541134	278881	277649	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC776.16	dad2	mis20	hos2	SPBC776.16|eic2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981739944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764168	2542418	2541853	278881	278344	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC2F3.11	dad2	SPAC2F3.11	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.972180567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764169	2542418	2540296	278881	276827	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC2D10.05	dad2	exg3	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262242165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764170	2542418	2541117	278881	277632	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC646.13	dad2	sds23	hos2	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.628166987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764171	2542418	2540161	278881	276696	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC13E7.03c	dad2	SPBC13E7.03c	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.084655464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764172	2542418	2539734	278881	276286	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC1604.16c	dad2	SPBC1604.16c	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.355552815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764173	2542418	2540686	278881	277211	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC21D10.10	dad2	bdc1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.626448156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764174	2542418	2539309	278881	275876	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC4G3.19	dad2	alp16	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.037011162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764175	2542418	2540664	278881	277189	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC215.02	dad2	bob1	hos2	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.988769244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764176	2542418	3361436	278881	280512	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC1296.01c	dad2	SPAC1296.01c	hos2	SPAC22F3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.70087106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764177	2542418	2539332	278881	275898	SPAC1805.07c	SPCPB1C11.01	dad2	amt1	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.33290165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764178	2542418	2541235	278881	277749	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC8D2.12c	dad2	SPBC8D2.12c	hos2	pI053	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042801222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764179	2542418	2539226	278881	275796	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC16C4.20c	dad2	SPCC16C4.20c	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.41022005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764180	2542418	2539420	278881	275985	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC970.07c	dad2	raf2	hos2	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.252112538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764181	2542418	2541200	278881	277714	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC8D2.03c	dad2	hhf2	hos2	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.27465027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764182	2542418	2542468	278881	278929	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC1D4.09c	dad2	rtf2	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.554289521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764183	2542418	2541208	278881	277722	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC887.04c	dad2	lub1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.775526528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764184	2542418	2538847	278881	275428	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC594.06c	dad2	SPCC594.06c	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.37685582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764185	2542418	2541471	278881	277973	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC1F5.03c	dad2	SPAC1F5.03c	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578806008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764186	2542418	2538775	278881	275357	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC23B6.05c	dad2	ssb3	hos2	rpa3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321715189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764187	2542418	2542816	278881	279263	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC4G8.11c	dad2	atp10	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443912672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764188	2542418	2541058	278881	277573	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC3H7.09	dad2	erf2	hos2	mug142	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933212583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764189	2542418	2540251	278881	276783	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC336.05c	dad2	SPBC336.05c	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708182123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764190	2542418	2541498	278881	278000	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC227.10	dad2	SPAC227.10	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.815157463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764191	2542418	2543156	278881	279587	SPAC1805.07c	SPAP8A3.13c	dad2	SPAP8A3.13c	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.853471119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764192	2542418	2543579	278881	279994	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC9.11	dad2	SPAC9.11	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.63064297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764193	2542418	2539564	278881	276125	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC550.12	dad2	arp6	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.315982627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764194	2542418	2539463	278881	276026	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC550.11	dad2	SPCC550.11	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.248660629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764195	2542418	2539045	278881	275618	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC1235.05c	dad2	fft2	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.901356712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764196	2542418	2542696	278881	279149	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC29B12.03	dad2	spd1	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.245483398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764197	2542418	2542569	278881	279025	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC186.08c	dad2	SPAC186.08c	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090529817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764198	2542418	2541419	278881	277925	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC1F3.07c	dad2	rsc58	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873140219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764199	2542418	2539434	278881	275997	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC757.09c	dad2	rnc1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.95905805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764200	2542418	2541026	278881	277541	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC337.09	dad2	erg28	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.881366449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764201	2542418	2539575	278881	276135	SPAC1805.07c	SPCP20C8.02c	dad2	SPCP20C8.02c	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.971335913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764202	2542418	2540929	278881	277445	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC354.03	dad2	swd3	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.830838586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764203	2542418	2539937	278881	276481	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC1539.08	dad2	arf6	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.118456528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764204	2542418	2539314	278881	275880	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC548.05c	dad2	dbl5	hos2	SPCC548.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.617974581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764205	2542418	2542182	278881	278657	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC19B12.08	dad2	atg4	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926405602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764206	2542418	2540425	278881	276953	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC27.06c	dad2	mgr2	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.484853193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764207	2542418	2541424	278881	277929	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC23G3.04	dad2	ies4	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.002158962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764208	2542418	2542318	278881	278784	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC16C9.05	dad2	cph1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.21076991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764209	2542418	2541560	278881	278059	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC24B11.12c	dad2	SPAC24B11.12c	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.767086882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764210	2542418	2542277	278881	278746	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC17A5.02c	dad2	dbr1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.867155961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764211	2542418	2543685	278881	280099	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC3C7.03c	dad2	rad55	hos2	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.385976989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764212	2542418	2542189	278881	278664	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC17A5.09c	dad2	glc9	hos2	SPAC17A5.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.096131268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764213	2542418	2541580	278881	278077	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC1687.05	dad2	pli1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.641849248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764214	2542418	2543296	278881	279721	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC9E9.03	dad2	leu2	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.8732907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764215	2542418	2539129	278881	275701	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC338.14	dad2	ado1	hos2	SPCC338.14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819075917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764216	2542418	2540263	278881	276794	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC32H8.02c	dad2	nep2	hos2	mug120|pi021|SPACTOKYO_453.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.415421216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764217	2542418	2543108	278881	279540	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC3A12.13c	dad2	SPAC3A12.13c	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511729722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764218	2542418	2539244	278881	275814	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC1672.06c	dad2	asp1	hos2	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.568772186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764219	2542418	2543563	278881	279979	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC664.02c	dad2	arp8	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.061375882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764220	2542418	2541004	278881	277519	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC3F6.01c	dad2	SPBC3F6.01c	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712356514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764221	2542418	2539100	278881	275672	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC330.12c	dad2	sdh3	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923360006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764222	2542418	2543078	278881	279511	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC31A2.15c	dad2	dcc1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.329920753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764223	2542418	2538906	278881	275483	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC1259.03	dad2	rpa12	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.956148693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764224	2542418	2542981	278881	279419	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC824.02	dad2	bst1	hos2	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.889130824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764225	2542418	2542791	278881	279240	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC167.04	dad2	pam17	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.510534111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764226	2542418	2540825	278881	277343	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC428.08c	dad2	clr4	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.957741975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764227	2542418	2539023	278881	275596	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC594.05c	dad2	spf1	hos2	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.545277645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764228	2542418	2541544	278881	278044	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC22G7.06c	dad2	ura1	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038541283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764229	2542418	2542268	278881	278737	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC17A5.07c	dad2	ulp2	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.464312363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764230	2542418	2542036	278881	278518	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC23A1.19c	dad2	hrq1	hos2	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.088743744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764231	2542418	2539467	278881	276030	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC417.07c	dad2	mto1	hos2	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.978869508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764232	2542418	3361461	278881	280537	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC11H11.01	dad2	sst6	hos2	cps23	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574141229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764233	2542418	2543514	278881	279932	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC4D7.03	dad2	pop2	hos2	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0228426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764234	2542418	2538821	278881	275402	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC584.01c	dad2	SPCC584.01c	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.051411135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764235	2542418	2540797	278881	277316	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC18H10.11c	dad2	ppr2	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.843965634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764236	2542418	2542646	278881	279100	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC11H11.05c	dad2	fta6	hos2	sma6	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.010877306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764237	2542418	2543445	278881	279865	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC4F10.13c	dad2	mpd2	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.828545747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764238	2542418	2542249	278881	278719	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC30D11.14c	dad2	SPAC30D11.14c	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044573625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764239	2542418	2538770	278881	275353	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC1753.02c	dad2	git3	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.030542347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764240	2542418	2542652	278881	279106	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC1687.15	dad2	gsk3	hos2	skp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.074225088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764241	2542418	2542463	278881	278924	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC1834.03c	dad2	hhf1	hos2	h4.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.771375576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764242	2542418	2542123	278881	278599	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC18G6.15	dad2	mal3	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.768985248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764243	2542418	2539733	278881	276285	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC16E9.12c	dad2	pab2	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.124451837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764244	2542418	2542971	278881	279410	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC105.02c	dad2	SPAC105.02c	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441041214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764245	2542418	2538800	278881	275381	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC1322.06	dad2	kap113	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.552271752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764246	2542418	2541578	278881	278075	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC25B8.05	dad2	deg1	hos2	SPAC25B8.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193043035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764247	2542418	2539219	278881	275789	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC1795.01c	dad2	mad3	hos2	SPCC895.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.340718048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764248	2542418	2542817	278881	279264	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC13G6.02c	dad2	rps101	hos2	rps1-1|rps3a-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317156668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764249	2542418	2543667	278881	280081	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC4H3.02c	dad2	swc3	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.974974214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764250	2542418	2541166	278881	277681	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC725.15	dad2	ura5	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.027614492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764251	2542418	2543117	278881	279549	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC806.08c	dad2	mod21	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.4817505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764252	2542418	2539857	278881	276404	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC1604.20c	dad2	tea2	hos2	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.663672405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764253	2542418	2541310	278881	277822	SPAC1805.07c	SPBP18G5.03	dad2	toc1	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930692005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764254	2542418	2541899	278881	278389	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC22E12.11c	dad2	set3	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.660185419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764255	2542418	2538890	278881	275468	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC1393.02c	dad2	spt2	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.456742217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764256	2542418	2542902	278881	279346	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC144.05	dad2	SPAC144.05	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986257598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764257	2542418	2540231	278881	276763	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC336.14c	dad2	ppk26	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.672565076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764258	2542418	2541710	278881	278205	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC343.11c	dad2	msc1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.993382444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764259	2542418	2541351	278881	277862	SPAC1805.07c	SPBP4H10.14c	dad2	SPBP4H10.14c	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046630754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764260	2542418	2542526	278881	278984	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC57A7.13	dad2	SPAC57A7.13	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.050536977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764261	2542418	2539667	278881	276222	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC13G1.08c	dad2	ash2	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.584730412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764262	2542418	2541830	278881	278321	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC5H10.01	dad2	SPAC5H10.01	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.924234271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764263	2542418	2542126	278881	278602	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC1B3.05	dad2	not3	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.431710428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764264	2542418	2540194	278881	276727	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC1709.09	dad2	rrf1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6398602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764265	2542418	2540751	278881	277273	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC20F10.10	dad2	psl1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.018106217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764266	2542418	2542976	278881	279414	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC9E9.09c	dad2	atd1	hos2	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.772275547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764267	2542418	2539974	278881	276518	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC32H8.07	dad2	git5	hos2	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.411926361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764268	2542418	2541900	278881	278390	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC23H4.17c	dad2	srb10	hos2	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.312312666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764269	2542418	2540318	278881	276848	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC30B4.04c	dad2	sol1	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.198810975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764270	2542418	2539408	278881	275973	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC576.12c	dad2	mhf2	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.316885843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764271	2542418	2541009	278881	277524	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC428.04	dad2	apq12	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443975117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764272	2542418	5802861	278881	857999	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC1D4.01	dad2	tls1	hos2	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380080323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764273	2542418	2539715	278881	276268	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC1778.09	dad2	SPBC1778.09	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.517571703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764274	2542418	2543443	278881	279863	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC3H1.12c	dad2	snt2	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.11908807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764275	2542418	2541389	278881	277900	SPAC1805.07c	SPBPB2B2.09c	dad2	SPBPB2B2.09c	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.378080839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764276	2542418	2539368	278881	275934	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC16A11.07	dad2	coq10	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852645381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764277	2542418	2543561	278881	279977	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC922.04	dad2	SPAC922.04	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769435876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764278	2542418	2539740	278881	276292	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC1685.04	dad2	SPBC1685.04	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.898280832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764279	2542418	2542125	278881	278601	SPAC1805.07c	SPAP8A3.03	dad2	SPAP8A3.03	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.261873363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764280	2542418	2542618	278881	279072	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC1952.15c	dad2	rec24	hos2	mug6	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984288486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764281	2542418	2541112	278881	277627	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC725.07	dad2	pex5	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196515178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764282	2542418	2541708	278881	278203	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC31A2.02	dad2	trm112	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452019772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764283	2542418	2541464	278881	277966	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC222.08c	dad2	SPAC222.08c	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.00367668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764284	2542418	2540342	278881	276871	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC2G2.01c	dad2	liz1	hos2	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.328457976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764285	2542418	2539402	278881	275967	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC613.03	dad2	SPCC613.03	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638285158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764286	2542418	2543307	278881	279731	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC694.05c	dad2	rps2502	hos2	rps25|rps25-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.94846245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764287	2542418	2540967	278881	277483	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC36B7.08c	dad2	SPBC36B7.08c	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.32876178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764288	2542418	2540882	278881	277399	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC4F6.08c	dad2	mrpl39	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.625016465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764289	2542418	2540533	278881	277061	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC29A10.16c	dad2	SPBC29A10.16c	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.384764289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764290	2542418	2541614	278881	278111	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC29A4.20	dad2	elp3	hos2	kat9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.717342731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764291	2542418	2540687	278881	277212	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC21D10.08c	dad2	SPBC21D10.08c	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.461390888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764292	2542418	2540229	278881	276761	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC31F10.15c	dad2	atp15	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.959184249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764293	2542418	2541927	278881	278415	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC222.12c	dad2	atp2	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.331908847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764294	2542418	2538884	278881	275462	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC1393.08	dad2	SPCC1393.08	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325215639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764295	2542418	3361105	278881	280181	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC188.10c	dad2	SPCC188.10c	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.51538228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764296	2542418	2542255	278881	278725	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC57A7.08	dad2	pzh1	hos2	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712401253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764297	2542418	2541488	278881	277990	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC227.17c	dad2	SPAC227.17c	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.120155996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764298	2542418	2539812	278881	276362	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC1347.02	dad2	fkbp39	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.690412522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764299	2542418	2540193	278881	276726	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC1289.10c	dad2	adn2	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.686067885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764300	2542418	2541337	278881	277848	SPAC1805.07c	SPBP35G2.13c	dad2	swc2	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.916041964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764301	2542418	2541378	278881	277889	SPAC1805.07c	SPBP8B7.21	dad2	ubp3	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.020224303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764302	2542418	2539527	278881	276089	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC338.16	dad2	pof3	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.986573353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764303	2542418	2543139	278881	279571	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC12G12.03	dad2	cip2	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980179121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764304	2542418	2540589	278881	277115	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC20F10.06	dad2	mad2	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.783677166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764305	2542418	2541963	278881	278449	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC21E11.04	dad2	aca1	hos2	ppr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.345377516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764306	2542418	2538848	278881	275429	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC613.12c	dad2	raf1	hos2	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.376597678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764307	2542418	3361520	278881	280596	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC1610.02c	dad2	SPAC1610.02c	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.760849887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764308	2542418	2541144	278881	277659	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC685.06	dad2	rps001	hos2	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.942350051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764309	2542418	2540821	278881	277339	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC800.03	dad2	clr3	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.261765822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764310	2542418	2539908	278881	276454	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC13E7.06	dad2	msd1	hos2	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.475898931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764311	2542418	2539763	278881	276314	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC1861.05	dad2	SPBC1861.05	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.252605667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764312	2542418	2540910	278881	277426	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC577.02	dad2	rpl3801	hos2	rpl38-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329136584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764313	2542418	2538762	278881	275345	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC306.04c	dad2	set1	hos2	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.171865298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764314	2542418	2543628	278881	280042	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC3H8.10	dad2	spo20	hos2	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.914631466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764315	2542418	2542516	278881	278974	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC2F7.04	dad2	pmc2	hos2	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.011129124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764316	2542418	2541175	278881	277689	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC839.13c	dad2	rpl1601	hos2	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.347575686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764317	2542418	2541909	278881	278399	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC227.01c	dad2	erd1	hos2	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.290731137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764318	2542418	2540498	278881	277026	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC27.02c	dad2	ask1	hos2	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.607525065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764319	2542418	2539925	278881	276469	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC16H5.13	dad2	SPBC16H5.13	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.569170147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764320	2542418	2540800	278881	277319	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC409.20c	dad2	psh3	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.270044908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764321	2542418	2542541	278881	278998	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC1B3.03c	dad2	wis2	hos2	cyp5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.146018005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764322	2542418	2540384	278881	276913	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC29A10.11c	dad2	vps902	hos2	vps9b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1478486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764323	2542418	2538966	278881	275540	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC18.10	dad2	SPCC18.10	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.922313547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764324	2542418	2539246	278881	275816	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC18.13	dad2	SPCC18.13	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.59140115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764325	2542418	2540960	278881	277476	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC3D6.02	dad2	but2	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635472642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764326	2542418	2538962	278881	275536	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC965.13	dad2	SPCC965.13	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87226386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764327	2542418	2539614	278881	276172	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC17D11.08	dad2	SPBC17D11.08	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873646047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764328	2542418	2541358	278881	277869	SPAC1805.07c	SPBP4H10.16c	dad2	SPBP4H10.16c	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.97445507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764329	2542418	2541100	278881	277615	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC651.04	dad2	SPBC651.04	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.623302606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764330	2542418	2541103	278881	277618	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC651.06	dad2	mug166	hos2	csa1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642763743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764331	2542418	2541432	278881	277937	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC1F5.05c	dad2	mso1	hos2	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512149299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764332	2542418	2539471	278881	276034	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC576.14	dad2	dph5	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326932939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764333	2542418	2540346	278881	276875	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC2F12.03c	dad2	ebs1	hos2	SPBC2F12.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.120776415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764334	2542418	2539029	278881	275602	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC61.05	dad2	SPCC61.05	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932163544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764335	2542418	2540164	278881	276699	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC1683.03c	dad2	SPBC1683.03c	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925302595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764336	2542418	2538916	278881	275493	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC16C4.17	dad2	mug123	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702990387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764337	2542418	2539514	278881	276076	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC663.14c	dad2	trp663	hos2	SPCC663.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096843747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764338	2542418	2542826	278881	279273	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC13G6.09	dad2	SPAC13G6.09	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581061335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764339	2542418	2539668	278881	276223	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC11B10.10c	dad2	pht1	hos2	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.846468512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764340	2542418	2540516	278881	277044	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC21C3.01c	dad2	vps13a	hos2	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711379024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764341	2542418	2542628	278881	279082	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC24H6.06	dad2	sld3	hos2	mug175	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.92571624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764342	2542418	2543109	278881	279541	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC3G6.09c	dad2	tps2	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.997816374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764343	2542418	2540927	278881	277443	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC365.06	dad2	pmt3	hos2	smt3|ubl2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.975050026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764344	2542418	2541115	278881	277630	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC660.07	dad2	ntp1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.788823705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764345	2542418	2540936	278881	277452	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC800.05c	dad2	atb2	hos2	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.356555006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764346	2542418	2543044	278881	279479	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC3C7.12	dad2	tip1	hos2	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.061176397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764347	2542418	2539726	278881	276278	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC13E7.08c	dad2	leo1	hos2	SPBC13E7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.362818171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764348	2542418	2539375	278881	275941	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC4G3.11	dad2	mug154	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.663568854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764349	2542418	2538840	278881	275421	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC736.07c	dad2	SPCC736.07c	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378650902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764350	2542418	2539189	278881	275760	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC1682.16	dad2	rpt4	hos2	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.497138143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764351	2542418	2539169	278881	275740	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC1235.11	dad2	mpc1	hos2	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378942059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764352	2542418	2540683	278881	277208	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC19G7.04	dad2	SPBC19G7.04	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98760595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764353	2542418	2539700	278881	276253	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC1685.15c	dad2	klp6	hos2	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.789435666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764354	2542418	2540108	278881	276645	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC13E7.11	dad2	rbd1	hos2	SPBC13E7.11|rh1|SPBC30D10.19c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329742099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764355	2542418	2543277	278881	279705	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC1002.03c	dad2	gls2	hos2	gls2alpha	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318961536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764356	2542418	2540766	278881	277286	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC19C2.02	dad2	pmt1	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097831693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764357	2542418	2538920	278881	275497	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC1840.05c	dad2	SPCC1840.05c	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.322525766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764358	2542418	2539743	278881	276295	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC16A3.08c	dad2	oga1	hos2	SPBC16A3.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041061594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764359	2542418	2539588	278881	276146	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC962.04	dad2	rps1201	hos2	rps12|rps12-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.503338511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764360	2542418	2541478	278881	277980	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC2F7.17	dad2	mrf1	hos2	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.312881464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764361	2542418	2539085	278881	275657	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC285.15c	dad2	rps2802	hos2	rps28|rps28-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328132131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764362	2542418	2541808	278881	278299	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC22A12.14c	dad2	SPAC22A12.14c	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507784764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764363	2542418	2541080	278881	277595	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC557.04	dad2	ppk29	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.559945368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764364	2542418	2542890	278881	279334	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC13G6.14	dad2	aps1	hos2	SPAC24B11.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.66072917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764365	2542418	2540309	278881	276839	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC21B10.13c	dad2	yox1	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.717287738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764366	2542418	2541272	278881	277786	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC947.03c	dad2	naa38	hos2	mak31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.413467867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764367	2542418	2542073	278881	278550	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC26F1.01	dad2	sec74	hos2	SPAPJ691.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153235057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764368	2542418	2542680	278881	279133	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC26F1.09	dad2	gyp51	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.671608961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764369	2542418	2540208	278881	276741	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC9B6.03	dad2	SPBC9B6.03	hos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.342806441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764370	2542418	2542617	278881	279071	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC13A11.01c	dad2	rga8	hos2	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.686475528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764371	2542418	2540320	278881	276850	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC3D6.04c	dad2	mad1	hos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.477734533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764372	2542418	2541260	278881	277774	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC902.05c	dad2	idh2	hos2	glu2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039210562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764373	2542418	2540649	278881	277174	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC19F8.08	dad2	rps401	hos2	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.260903317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764374	2539066	2543529	275638	279947	SPCC126.13c	SPAC4C5.02c	SPCC126.13c	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.233968581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764375	2539066	2542585	275638	279040	SPCC126.13c	SPAC31A2.13c	SPCC126.13c	sft1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.189047384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764376	2539066	2542555	275638	279012	SPCC126.13c	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC126.13c	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.993492119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764377	2539066	2540830	275638	277348	SPCC126.13c	SPBC18H10.16	SPCC126.13c	can1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928455382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764378	2539066	2541801	275638	278292	SPCC126.13c	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC126.13c	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.326887341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764379	2539066	2538706	275638	275290	SPCC126.13c	SPCC338.08	SPCC126.13c	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383656785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764380	2539066	2540326	275638	276856	SPCC126.13c	SPBC2G5.06c	SPCC126.13c	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329109196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764381	2539066	2543628	275638	280042	SPCC126.13c	SPAC3H8.10	SPCC126.13c	spo20	-	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.83830565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764382	2539066	2542222	275638	278695	SPCC126.13c	SPAC31G5.18c	SPCC126.13c	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.364309528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764383	2539066	2543602	275638	280017	SPCC126.13c	SPAPB1A11.04c	SPCC126.13c	mca1	-	SPAPB1A11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.810630927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764384	2539066	2543472	275638	279892	SPCC126.13c	SPAC959.04c	SPCC126.13c	omh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.324923494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764385	2541614	2539050	278111	275623	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC11E10.08	elp3	rik1	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.009322215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764386	2541614	2539147	278111	275719	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC622.12c	elp3	gdh1	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.852347839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764387	2541614	2543497	278111	279916	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC926.09c	elp3	fas1	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1346074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764388	2541614	2539034	278111	275607	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC830.10	elp3	ham1	kat9	SPCC830.10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.436485443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764389	2541614	2541902	278111	278392	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC27E2.07	elp3	pvg2	kat9	mug53	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.878276854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764390	2541614	2539788	278111	276338	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC17D1.02	elp3	dph2	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.320789619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764391	2541614	2540060	278111	276598	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC106.01	elp3	mph1	kat9	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036777786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764392	2541614	2542435	278111	278897	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC1805.16c	elp3	SPAC1805.16c	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.630352799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764393	2541614	2543529	278111	279947	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC4C5.02c	elp3	ryh1	kat9	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.112602027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764394	2541614	2542585	278111	279040	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC31A2.13c	elp3	sft1	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874770355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764395	2541614	2542291	278111	278759	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC17C9.08	elp3	pnu1	kat9	end1|nuc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05554586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764396	2541614	2542372	278111	278836	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC1F3.03	elp3	SPAC1F3.03	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.256651336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764397	2541614	2541570	278111	278067	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC6G9.09c	elp3	rpl2401	kat9	rpl24|rpl24-01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.740462951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764398	2541614	2540213	278111	276746	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC17D1.06	elp3	dbp3	kat9	SPCC17D1.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.8149932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764399	2541614	2541552	278111	278051	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC1142.08	elp3	fhl1	kat9	SPAC8C9.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.353478002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764400	2541614	2540524	278111	277052	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC21B10.08c	elp3	SPBC21B10.08c	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.316009862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764401	2541614	2539035	278111	275608	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC794.09c	elp3	tef101	kat9	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.045263445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764402	2541614	2539930	278111	276474	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC1198.11c	elp3	reb1	kat9	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.626224224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764403	2541614	2541130	278111	277645	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC776.11	elp3	rpl2801	kat9	rpl28-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.952952679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764404	2541614	2539939	278111	276483	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC11G11.01	elp3	fis1	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321727459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764405	2541614	2543559	278111	279975	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC664.04c	elp3	rps1602	kat9	rps16|rps16-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.00777821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764406	2541614	2541117	278111	277632	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC646.13	elp3	sds23	kat9	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.317139845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764407	2541614	2543572	278111	279987	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC4G8.04	elp3	SPAC4G8.04	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930801766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764408	2541614	2543434	278111	279854	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC8F11.02c	elp3	dph3	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.824147878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764409	2541614	2539890	278111	276436	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC16C6.03c	elp3	SPBC16C6.03c	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.341391342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764410	2541614	2542071	278111	278548	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC26H5.03	elp3	pcf2	kat9	cac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448735838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764411	2541614	2542986	278111	279424	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC11D3.14c	elp3	SPAC11D3.14c	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.189125965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764412	2541614	2543103	278111	279535	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC3F10.09	elp3	SPAC3F10.09	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775109626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764413	2541614	2541082	278111	277597	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC577.11	elp3	SPBC577.11	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.414963801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764414	2541614	2540491	278111	277019	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC28E12.04	elp3	SPBC28E12.04	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.71776492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764415	2541614	2543320	278111	279744	SPAC29A4.20	SPAPJ695.01c	elp3	SPAPJ695.01c	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32157703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764416	2541614	2538976	278111	275550	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC1840.04	elp3	pca1	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09585216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764417	2541614	2541361	278111	277872	SPAC29A4.20	SPBP8B7.10c	elp3	utp16	kat9	SPBP8B7.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.512921491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764418	2541614	2543098	278111	279530	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC4A8.06c	elp3	SPAC4A8.06c	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.707958532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764419	2541614	2540999	278111	277515	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC4B4.04	elp3	SPBC4B4.04	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.273785026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764420	2541614	2539420	278111	275985	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC970.07c	elp3	raf2	kat9	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.494601641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764421	2541614	2540015	278111	276559	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC1685.02c	elp3	rps1202	kat9	rps12-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.394311438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764422	2541614	2542468	278111	278929	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC1D4.09c	elp3	rtf2	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.551041555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764423	2541614	2541208	278111	277722	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC887.04c	elp3	lub1	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.631332129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764424	2541614	2541012	278111	277527	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC3H7.12	elp3	rav2	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.84852534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764425	2541614	2540979	278111	277495	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC3H7.10	elp3	elp6	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.134579542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764426	2541614	2539970	278111	276514	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC1773.01	elp3	far8	kat9	SPBC1773.01|csc3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.39234347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764427	2541614	2538847	278111	275428	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC594.06c	elp3	SPCC594.06c	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.775796229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764428	2541614	2541058	278111	277573	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC3H7.09	elp3	erf2	kat9	mug142	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448035791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764429	2541614	2541994	278111	278478	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC26A3.14c	elp3	SPAC26A3.14c	kat9	SPAC23A6.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.183543483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764430	2541614	2538814	278111	275395	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC777.17c	elp3	SPCC777.17c	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.805687263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764431	2541614	2540029	278111	276573	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC16A3.01	elp3	spn3	kat9	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.692979739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764432	2541614	2542724	278111	279175	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC767.01c	elp3	vps1	kat9	SPAC9G1.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.938066662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764433	2541614	2539249	278111	275819	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC1450.05c	elp3	rox3	kat9	med19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.32552195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764434	2541614	2540919	278111	277435	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC543.07	elp3	pek1	kat9	mkk1|skh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.60239306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764435	2541614	2539606	278111	276164	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC15D4.05	elp3	SPBC15D4.05	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868516411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764436	2541614	2538833	278111	275414	SPAC29A4.20	SPCP1E11.11	elp3	puf6	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.417683106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764437	2541614	2539575	278111	276135	SPAC29A4.20	SPCP20C8.02c	elp3	SPCP20C8.02c	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.374765425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764438	2541614	2541119	278111	277634	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC651.11c	elp3	apm3	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515351074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764439	2541614	2539937	278111	276481	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC1539.08	elp3	arf6	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.560822819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764440	2541614	2542012	278111	278495	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC23C11.02c	elp3	rps23	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.269636984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764441	2541614	2540727	278111	277250	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC1921.03c	elp3	mex67	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.18944619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764442	2541614	2542022	278111	278505	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC23A1.03	elp3	apt1	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.44991006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764443	2541614	2542135	278111	278611	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC13A11.04c	elp3	ubp8	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.098829965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764444	2541614	2541424	278111	277929	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC23G3.04	elp3	ies4	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.435653189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764445	2541614	2542318	278111	278784	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC16C9.05	elp3	cph1	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.060875536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764446	2541614	2542023	278111	278506	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC20H4.10	elp3	ufd2	kat9	SPAC145.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.898479722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764447	2541614	2541527	278111	278027	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC31A2.09c	elp3	apm4	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.061059235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764448	2541614	2540295	278111	276826	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC3B8.05	elp3	SPBC3B8.05	kat9	dph1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.522593501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764449	2541614	2543609	278111	280023	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC630.05	elp3	gyp7	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5495806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764450	2541614	2539441	278111	276004	SPAC29A4.20	SPCPJ732.02c	elp3	xks1	kat9	SPCPJ732.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.259749086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764451	2541614	2540851	278111	277368	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC4F6.04	elp3	rpl2502	kat9	rpl23a-2|rpl25b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.67329934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764452	2541614	2541580	278111	278077	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC1687.05	elp3	pli1	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.120866202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764453	2541614	2539175	278111	275746	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC16C4.01	elp3	sif2	kat9	SPCC5E4.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.95000518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764454	2541614	2541195	278111	277709	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC839.17c	elp3	fkh1	kat9	SPBC24E9.17c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.54609928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764455	2541614	2543108	278111	279540	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC3A12.13c	elp3	SPAC3A12.13c	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.472010106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764456	2541614	2538969	278111	275543	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC1840.12	elp3	opt3	kat9	SPCC1840.12|SPCC965.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.99716718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764457	2541614	2541522	278111	278023	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC23E2.01	elp3	fep1	kat9	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.633570647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764458	2541614	2538927	278111	275503	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC1795.09	elp3	yps1	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441818124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764459	2541614	2543426	278111	279846	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC631.02	elp3	bdf2	kat9	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037009963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764460	2541614	2541663	278111	278159	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC22G7.08	elp3	ppk8	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.561725479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764461	2541614	2542034	278111	278516	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC27E2.04c	elp3	mug155	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.056331759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764462	2541614	2540825	278111	277343	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC428.08c	elp3	clr4	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.782018427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764463	2541614	2541021	278111	277536	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC3B8.10c	elp3	nem1	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.758954645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764464	2541614	2542665	278111	279118	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC10F6.08c	elp3	nht10	kat9	nht1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318924097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764465	2541614	2539960	278111	276504	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC15D4.15	elp3	pho2	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.090554035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764466	2541614	2542268	278111	278737	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC17A5.07c	elp3	ulp2	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714711554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764467	2541614	2539467	278111	276030	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC417.07c	elp3	mto1	kat9	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.086955802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764468	2541614	2539388	278111	275953	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC24B10.12	elp3	cgi121	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.679385168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764469	2541614	2542260	278111	278729	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC1F12.05	elp3	SPAC1F12.05	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780687232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764470	2541614	2542394	278111	278858	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC31G5.12c	elp3	maf1	kat9	n150	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.103840017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764471	2541614	2542896	278111	279340	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC3F10.04	elp3	gsa1	kat9	gsh2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446325228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764472	2541614	2543020	278111	279456	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC10F6.13c	elp3	SPAC10F6.13c	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.505258508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764473	2541614	2542177	278111	278652	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC17H9.08	elp3	SPAC17H9.08	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154283223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764474	2541614	2541249	278111	277763	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC947.01	elp3	alf1	kat9	SPBC947.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.92046745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764475	2541614	2542019	278111	278502	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC23A1.17	elp3	SPAC23A1.17	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.786055866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764476	2541614	2540892	278111	277408	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC530.01	elp3	gyp1	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45026945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764477	2541614	2542707	278111	279160	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC25G10.03	elp3	zip1	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043333336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764478	2541614	2540647	278111	277172	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC18H10.07	elp3	SPBC18H10.07	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.291903641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764479	2541614	2541160	278111	277675	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC725.09c	elp3	hob3	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.137684685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764480	2541614	2540348	278111	276877	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC29A10.05	elp3	exo1	kat9	mut2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867980454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764481	2541614	2541038	278111	277553	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC29A10.01	elp3	ccr1	kat9	SPBC365.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.689763542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764482	2541614	2540338	278111	276867	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC2G2.13c	elp3	dcd1	kat9	SPBC2G2.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817673969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764483	2541614	2542544	278111	279001	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC18G6.10	elp3	lem2	kat9	heh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.139906787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764484	2541614	2542507	278111	278965	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC18G6.13	elp3	SPAC18G6.13	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986663957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764485	2541614	2540673	278111	277198	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC1D7.03	elp3	mug80	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.77393008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764486	2541614	2543638	278111	280052	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC3H8.09c	elp3	nab3	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.340359169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764487	2541614	2541578	278111	278075	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC25B8.05	elp3	deg1	kat9	SPAC25B8.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.638954709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764488	2541614	2542817	278111	279264	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC13G6.02c	elp3	rps101	kat9	rps1-1|rps3a-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924176332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764489	2541614	2539371	278111	275937	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC18B5.06	elp3	dom34	kat9	SPCC18B5.06|erf1|sup45	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.662558315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764490	2541614	2539281	278111	275849	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC132.03	elp3	SPCC132.03	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.560834501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764491	2541614	2540403	278111	276931	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC21D10.11c	elp3	nfs1	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.007332837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764492	2541614	2539484	278111	276047	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC594.04c	elp3	SPCC594.04c	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506345883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764493	2541614	2539454	278111	276017	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC622.15c	elp3	SPCC622.15c	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.447800015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764494	2541614	2539999	278111	276543	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC1734.15	elp3	rsc4	kat9	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.219394214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764495	2541614	2543117	278111	279549	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC806.08c	elp3	mod21	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868028401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764496	2541614	2539603	278111	276161	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC1289.06c	elp3	ppr8	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.908029958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764497	2541614	2541929	278111	278417	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC23C4.12	elp3	hhp2	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.564143636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764498	2541614	2539250	278111	275820	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC1884.02	elp3	nic1	kat9	SPCC757.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.454751692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764499	2541614	2542651	278111	279105	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC24C9.12c	elp3	SPAC24C9.12c	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.137024898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764500	2541614	2543643	278111	280057	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC3G9.07c	elp3	hos2	kat9	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.825473217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764501	2541614	2540661	278111	277186	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC23E6.03c	elp3	nta1	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.805200489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764502	2541614	2540086	278111	276624	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC16H5.12c	elp3	SPBC16H5.12c	kat9	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.746327723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764503	2541614	2541739	278111	278233	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC2G11.10c	elp3	SPAC2G11.10c	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6192509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764504	2541614	2538852	278111	275433	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC4E9.01c	elp3	rec11	kat9	SPCC550.16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.422040234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764505	2541614	2539455	278111	276018	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC736.09c	elp3	SPCC736.09c	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317959818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764506	2541614	2542007	278111	278490	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC20H4.07	elp3	rad57	kat9	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.475115039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764507	2541614	2540430	278111	276958	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC25B2.01	elp3	SPBC25B2.01	kat9	SPBC2G5.08	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042291923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764508	2541614	2538945	278111	275519	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC1739.06c	elp3	SPCC1739.06c	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980030981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764509	2541614	2542976	278111	279414	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC9E9.09c	elp3	atd1	kat9	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.165704594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764510	2541614	2540961	278111	277477	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC36B7.03	elp3	sec63	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.046043308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764511	2541614	2538849	278111	275430	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC330.14c	elp3	rpl2402	kat9	rpl24-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.896920395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764512	2541614	2539974	278111	276518	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC32H8.07	elp3	git5	kat9	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.388086529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764513	2541614	2541720	278111	278214	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC23H3.13c	elp3	gpa2	kat9	git8	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873598013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764514	2541614	2540836	278111	277354	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC18H10.19	elp3	vps38	kat9	atg14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.716878634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764515	2541614	2543378	278111	279800	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC3H8.07c	elp3	pac10	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.354820437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764516	2541614	2540327	278111	276857	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC31F10.07	elp3	lsb5	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.513243223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764517	2541614	2543301	278111	279726	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC977.17	elp3	SPAC977.17	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.355384146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764518	2541614	2542519	278111	278977	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC19G12.08	elp3	scs7	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330965288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764519	2541614	2542439	278111	278901	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC17A5.08	elp3	erp2	kat9	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.518132422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764520	2541614	2541708	278111	278203	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC31A2.02	elp3	trm112	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.28742341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764521	2541614	2541464	278111	277966	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC222.08c	elp3	SPAC222.08c	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.763175179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764522	2541614	2540342	278111	276871	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC2G2.01c	elp3	liz1	kat9	SPBC4B4.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.144106017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764523	2541614	2541053	278111	277568	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC56F2.10c	elp3	alg5	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.050141061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764524	2541614	2543307	278111	279731	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC694.05c	elp3	rps2502	kat9	rps25|rps25-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.284458951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764525	2541614	2540180	278111	276713	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC16D10.11c	elp3	rps1801	kat9	rps18-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.673548091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764526	2541614	2540967	278111	277483	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC36B7.08c	elp3	SPBC36B7.08c	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.422622051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764527	2541614	2539847	278111	276395	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC530.14c	elp3	dsk1	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.022020041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764528	2541614	2541266	278111	277780	SPAC29A4.20	SPBP16F5.05c	elp3	yar1	kat9	SPBP16F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.140383246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764529	2541614	2540844	278111	277361	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC1921.04c	elp3	SPBC1921.04c	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.28352113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764530	2541614	2539059	278111	275632	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC737.06c	elp3	SPCC737.06c	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.993216408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764531	2541614	3361105	278111	280181	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC188.10c	elp3	SPCC188.10c	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633423253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764532	2541614	2543477	278111	279897	SPAC29A4.20	SPAPB2B4.04c	elp3	SPAPB2B4.04c	kat9	pmc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992933798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764533	2541614	2540193	278111	276726	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC1289.10c	elp3	adn2	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.066091446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764534	2541614	2541378	278111	277889	SPAC29A4.20	SPBP8B7.21	elp3	ubp3	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.923764775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764535	2541614	2539519	278111	276081	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC364.05	elp3	vps3	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63429299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764536	2541614	2542973	278111	279412	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC10F6.04	elp3	SPAC10F6.04	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.185831585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764537	2541614	2541742	278111	278236	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC22H10.09	elp3	SPAC22H10.09	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.379668431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764538	2541614	2542748	278111	279198	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC15A10.09c	elp3	pun1	kat9	SPAC15A10.09c|sur7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.062354293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764539	2541614	2541963	278111	278449	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC21E11.04	elp3	aca1	kat9	ppr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.263845563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764540	2541614	2538848	278111	275429	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC613.12c	elp3	raf1	kat9	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.791119872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764541	2541614	2541017	278111	277532	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC36.07	elp3	elp1	kat9	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.390234322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764542	2541614	2541628	278111	278124	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC110.02	elp3	pds5	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.133383631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764543	2541614	2540821	278111	277339	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC800.03	elp3	clr3	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.101461026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764544	2541614	2539763	278111	276314	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC1861.05	elp3	SPBC1861.05	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.186006586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764545	2541614	2542806	278111	279254	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC1610.01	elp3	saf5	kat9	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.251978159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764546	2541614	2541786	278111	278278	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC22F3.08c	elp3	rok1	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.252404477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764547	2541614	2543391	278111	279813	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC4G9.09c	elp3	arg11	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.041376756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764548	2541614	2539842	278111	276390	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC14C8.15	elp3	SPBC14C8.15	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05921505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764549	2541614	2539354	278111	275920	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC4F11.03c	elp3	SPCC4F11.03c	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.061818425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764550	2541614	2541156	278111	277671	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC685.07c	elp3	rpl2701	kat9	rpl27-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.415410423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764551	2541614	2543051	278111	279486	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC1071.08	elp3	rpp203	kat9	rla6|rpp2-3|rpa2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.343873164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764552	2541614	2542516	278111	278974	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC2F7.04	elp3	pmc2	kat9	med1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.705233059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764553	2541614	2539438	278111	276001	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC4B3.07	elp3	nro1	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.463315114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764554	2541614	2541175	278111	277689	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC839.13c	elp3	rpl1601	kat9	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.088982232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764555	2541614	2542881	278111	279326	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC13F5.03c	elp3	gld1	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.326874351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764556	2541614	2540800	278111	277319	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC409.20c	elp3	psh3	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509781119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764557	2541614	2543160	278111	279591	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC31A2.14	elp3	bun107	kat9	wdr48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.627633082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764558	2541614	2540604	278111	277130	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC25D12.05	elp3	trm1	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.715927551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764559	2541614	2541432	278111	277937	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC1F5.05c	elp3	mso1	kat9	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.263893777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764560	2541614	2541425	278111	277930	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC2C4.17c	elp3	msy2	kat9	SPAC2C4.17c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.156711589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764561	2541614	2539346	278111	275912	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC569.04	elp3	SPCC569.04	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.819535876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764562	2541614	2542458	278111	278919	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC30.02c	elp3	SPAC30.02c	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.1803313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764563	2541614	2539471	278111	276034	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC576.14	elp3	dph5	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.986492789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764564	2541614	2543368	278111	279790	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC630.06c	elp3	SPAC630.06c	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03970537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764565	2541614	2541531	278111	278031	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC25A8.01c	elp3	fft3	kat9	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.899624823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764566	2541614	2539013	278111	275586	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC364.03	elp3	rpl1702	kat9	rpl17|rpl17-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982319401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764567	2541614	2540325	278111	276855	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC21B10.10	elp3	rps402	kat9	rps4-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.997781392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764568	2541614	2539136	278111	275708	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC1919.05	elp3	SPCC1919.05	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.46751819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764569	2541614	2542418	278111	278881	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC1805.07c	elp3	dad2	kat9	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.717342731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764570	2541614	2541229	278111	277743	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC839.05c	elp3	rps1701	kat9	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.11756217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764571	2541614	2542403	278111	278867	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC19A8.05c	elp3	sst4	kat9	vps27	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.028857878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764572	2541614	2543091	278111	279524	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC12G12.15	elp3	sif3	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.539219459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764573	2541614	2540629	278111	277155	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC21D10.09c	elp3	rkr1	kat9	SPBC21D10.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.469612533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764574	2541614	2542685	278111	279138	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC26A3.06	elp3	bud23	kat9	SPAC26A3.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.535521081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764575	2541614	2542826	278111	279273	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC13G6.09	elp3	SPAC13G6.09	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.345255872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764576	2541614	2543602	278111	280017	SPAC29A4.20	SPAPB1A11.04c	elp3	mca1	kat9	SPAPB1A11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.80454638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764577	2541614	2543420	278111	279842	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC3H1.04c	elp3	mdm31	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048405157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764578	2541614	2540297	278111	276828	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC24C6.08c	elp3	bhd1	kat9	bhd	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387564429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764579	2541614	2540928	278111	277444	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC3E7.10	elp3	fma1	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.80927488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764580	2541614	2539207	278111	275777	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC285.09c	elp3	cgs2	kat9	pde1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.235149636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764581	2541614	2541757	278111	278251	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC2F7.10	elp3	akr1	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.841775414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764582	2541614	2539702	278111	276255	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC1604.12	elp3	SPBC1604.12	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.257991204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764583	2541614	2539205	278111	275775	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC4B3.15	elp3	mid1	kat9	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.679259179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764584	2541614	2539726	278111	276278	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC13E7.08c	elp3	leo1	kat9	SPBC13E7.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.156611267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764585	2541614	2539375	278111	275941	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC4G3.11	elp3	mug154	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.985855681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764586	2541614	2542186	278111	278661	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC17C9.14	elp3	SPAC17C9.14	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.70609185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764587	2541614	2543380	278111	279802	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC4G9.16c	elp3	rpl901	kat9	rpl9-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.926164917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764588	2541614	2540146	278111	276683	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC17A3.06	elp3	SPBC17A3.06	kat9	pi040	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.071035078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764589	2541614	2539189	278111	275760	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC1682.16	elp3	rpt4	kat9	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.653153894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764590	2541614	2539178	278111	275749	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC1682.14	elp3	rpl1902	kat9	rpl19-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.191572397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764591	2541614	2541084	278111	277599	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC649.02	elp3	rps1902	kat9	rps19|rps19-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.978774814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764592	2541614	2543337	278111	279760	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC959.08	elp3	rpl2102	kat9	rpl21|rpl21-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201701752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764593	2541614	2541398	278111	277907	SPAC29A4.20	SPBPB2B2.11	elp3	SPBPB2B2.11	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4379004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764594	2541614	2539169	278111	275740	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC1235.11	elp3	mpc1	kat9	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.119920149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764595	2541614	2538861	278111	275441	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC1620.11	elp3	nup97	kat9	mug87	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.673257433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764596	2541614	2540683	278111	277208	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC19G7.04	elp3	SPBC19G7.04	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.243631518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764597	2541614	2543220	278111	279648	SPAC29A4.20	SPAPB21F2.02	elp3	SPAPB21F2.02	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.334985501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764598	2541614	2539700	278111	276253	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC1685.15c	elp3	klp6	kat9	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.251172074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764599	2541614	2543400	278111	279822	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC3G9.11c	elp3	SPAC3G9.11c	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.458325181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764600	2541614	2543277	278111	279705	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC1002.03c	elp3	gls2	kat9	gls2alpha	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.747151199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764601	2541614	2543684	278111	280098	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC4G8.03c	elp3	SPAC4G8.03c	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.199705448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764602	2541614	2538854	278111	275435	SPAC29A4.20	SPCP1E11.05c	elp3	are2	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.554375553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764603	2541614	2541778	278111	278271	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC23G3.05c	elp3	SPAC23G3.05c	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.268424447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764604	2541614	2542175	278111	278650	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC1F3.02c	elp3	mkh1	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504123316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764605	2541614	2542566	278111	279022	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC8C9.12c	elp3	SPAC8C9.12c	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.213173025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764606	2541614	2541003	278111	277518	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC3E7.16c	elp3	leu3	kat9	SPBC4F6.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807347964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764607	2541614	2540626	278111	277152	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC21C3.08c	elp3	car2	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.617819629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764608	2541614	2539743	278111	276295	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC16A3.08c	elp3	oga1	kat9	SPBC16A3.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876099718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764609	2541614	2539588	278111	276146	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC962.04	elp3	rps1201	kat9	rps12|rps12-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.976619311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764610	2541614	2543374	278111	279796	SPAC29A4.20	SPAPB1A10.08	elp3	SPAPB1A10.08	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.920445585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764611	2541614	2543644	278111	280058	SPAC29A4.20	SPAPB1A10.03	elp3	nxt1	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.869017364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764612	2541614	2543448	278111	279868	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC3H5.07	elp3	rpl702	kat9	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.87174335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764613	2541614	2540309	278111	276839	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC21B10.13c	elp3	yox1	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.324283225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764614	2541614	3361295	278111	280371	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC1921.01c	elp3	rpl35b	kat9	rpl37|rpl37-1|rpl3701|SPBC29C10.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.825596879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764615	2541614	2542561	278111	279017	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC31G5.17c	elp3	rps1001	kat9	rps10-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.809151234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764616	2541614	2543463	278111	279883	SPAC29A4.20	SPAPB21F2.03	elp3	slx9	kat9	SPAPB21F2.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.694076847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764617	2541614	2539494	278111	276057	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC4G3.08	elp3	psk1	kat9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.135360324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764618	2541614	2542879	278111	279324	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC13G7.07	elp3	arb2	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455253307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764619	2541614	2541893	278111	278383	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC23H4.13c	elp3	SPAC23H4.13c	kat9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981347884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764620	2541614	2542609	278111	279063	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC31G5.04	elp3	lys12	kat9	SPAC31G5.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.623082738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764621	2541614	2542571	278111	279027	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC589.02c	elp3	med13	kat9	spTrap240|srb9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.141717413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764622	2542313	2538775	278779	275357	SPAC16A10.07c	SPCC23B6.05c	taz1	ssb3	myb|myb1	rpa3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.725539775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764623	2542313	2543685	278779	280099	SPAC16A10.07c	SPAC3C7.03c	taz1	rad55	myb|myb1	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.964489949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764624	2542313	2539381	278779	275947	SPAC16A10.07c	SPCC1739.10	taz1	mug33	myb|myb1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.355065294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764625	2542313	2542036	278779	278518	SPAC16A10.07c	SPAC23A1.19c	taz1	hrq1	myb|myb1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.716284709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764626	2542313	2542007	278779	278490	SPAC16A10.07c	SPAC20H4.07	taz1	rad57	myb|myb1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.559396149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764627	2542313	2542170	278779	278645	SPAC16A10.07c	SPAC17G8.13c	taz1	mst2	myb|myb1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.631228657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764628	2539369	2538961	275935	275535	SPCC16A11.05c	SPCC285.14	dim1	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.76761844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764629	2539369	2540833	275935	277351	SPCC16A11.05c	SPBC18H10.20c	dim1	any1	-	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.832104059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764630	2539369	3361561	275935	280637	SPCC16A11.05c	SPAC11E3.01c	dim1	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.129105131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764631	2539369	2539097	275935	275669	SPCC16A11.05c	SPCC757.04	dim1	SPCC757.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448381972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764632	2539369	2539937	275935	276481	SPCC16A11.05c	SPBC1539.08	dim1	arf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.494100893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764633	2539369	2541323	275935	277835	SPCC16A11.05c	SPBP35G2.14	dim1	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.996214051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764634	2539369	2543426	275935	279846	SPCC16A11.05c	SPAC631.02	dim1	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.188468454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764635	2539369	2542311	275935	278777	SPCC16A11.05c	SPAC16A10.05c	dim1	dad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325495363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764636	2539369	2541800	275935	278291	SPCC16A11.05c	SPAC732.02c	dim1	SPAC732.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.995544916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764637	2539369	2543144	275935	279576	SPCC16A11.05c	SPAC3F10.05c	dim1	mug113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515218074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764638	2539369	2540922	275935	277438	SPCC16A11.05c	SPBC36.10	dim1	SPBC36.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319171288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764639	2539369	2539999	275935	276543	SPCC16A11.05c	SPBC1734.15	dim1	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.774572128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764640	2539369	2543667	275935	280081	SPCC16A11.05c	SPAC4H3.02c	dim1	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.949820591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764641	2539369	2539667	275935	276222	SPCC16A11.05c	SPBC13G1.08c	dim1	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.456867468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764642	2539369	3361269	275935	280345	SPCC16A11.05c	SPBC31A8.01c	dim1	rtn1	-	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.760843538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764643	2539369	2540997	275935	277513	SPCC16A11.05c	SPBC3H7.06c	dim1	pof9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.492738604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764644	2539369	2542946	275935	279386	SPCC16A11.05c	SPAC6F12.03c	dim1	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.394589503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764645	2539369	2540290	275935	276821	SPCC16A11.05c	SPBC29A3.02c	dim1	his7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.504481789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764646	2539369	2539715	275935	276268	SPCC16A11.05c	SPBC1778.09	dim1	SPBC1778.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.185825823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764647	2539369	2543443	275935	279863	SPCC16A11.05c	SPAC3H1.12c	dim1	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701355158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764648	2539369	2541337	275935	277848	SPCC16A11.05c	SPBP35G2.13c	dim1	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.820355879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764649	2539369	2540498	275935	277026	SPCC16A11.05c	SPBC27.02c	dim1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.920449111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764650	2539369	2538717	275935	275301	SPCC16A11.05c	SPCC1235.02	dim1	bio2	-	SPCC320.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.847339433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764651	2539369	2542222	275935	278695	SPCC16A11.05c	SPAC31G5.18c	dim1	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258701041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764652	2539369	2543602	275935	280017	SPCC16A11.05c	SPAPB1A11.04c	dim1	mca1	-	SPAPB1A11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319173071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764653	2539369	3361410	275935	280486	SPCC16A11.05c	SPAC1527.01	dim1	mok11	-	SPAC23D3.15	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.629007552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764654	2539369	2542943	275935	279384	SPCC16A11.05c	SPBC1348.03	dim1	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.577127015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764655	9407016	2541488	1028379	277990	SPNCRNA.214	SPAC227.17c	ter1	SPAC227.17c	SPNG585	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.689710252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764656	2542575	2542660	279031	279113	SPAC31G5.10	SPAC328.03	eta2	tps1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446008089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764657	2542575	2541388	279031	277899	SPAC31G5.10	SPBP8B7.30c	eta2	thi5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868991245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764658	2542575	2542305	279031	278772	SPAC31G5.10	SPAC8C9.10c	eta2	rrp14	-	SPAC8C9.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38917509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764659	2538690	2542207	275275	278682	SPCC1393.05	SPAC17H9.10c	ers1	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.691981933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764660	2538690	2540060	275275	276598	SPCC1393.05	SPBC106.01	ers1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.406888934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764661	2538690	2543637	275275	280051	SPCC1393.05	SPAC3H8.02	ers1	csr102	-	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.758460591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764662	2538690	2541912	275275	278402	SPCC1393.05	SPAC222.16c	ers1	csn3	-	SPAC821.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.297510989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764663	2538690	2542237	275275	278709	SPCC1393.05	SPAC19E9.02	ers1	fin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.657645874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764664	2538690	2539201	275275	275772	SPCC1393.05	SPCC188.09c	ers1	pfl4	-	SPCC188.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380849327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764665	2538690	2541994	275275	278478	SPCC1393.05	SPAC26A3.14c	ers1	SPAC26A3.14c	-	SPAC23A6.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714098335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764666	2538690	2543383	275275	279805	SPCC1393.05	SPAC869.08	ers1	pcm2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.392708615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764667	2538690	2541998	275275	278482	SPCC1393.05	SPAC23A1.09	ers1	SPAC23A1.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.749274885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764668	2538690	2543029	275275	279465	SPCC1393.05	SPAC11G7.01	ers1	SPAC11G7.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.001036374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764669	2538690	2542022	275275	278505	SPCC1393.05	SPAC23A1.03	ers1	apt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.100770771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764670	2538690	2541527	275275	278027	SPCC1393.05	SPAC31A2.09c	ers1	apm4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.631135597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764671	2538690	2542277	275275	278746	SPCC1393.05	SPAC17A5.02c	ers1	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.83164655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764672	2538690	2539352	275275	275918	SPCC1393.05	SPCC188.07	ers1	ccq1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871916943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764673	2538690	2538700	275275	275285	SPCC1393.05	SPCC645.13	ers1	SPCC645.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445582494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764674	2538690	2542845	275275	279291	SPCC1393.05	SPAC824.04	ers1	SPAC824.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708613805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764675	2538690	2540825	275275	277343	SPCC1393.05	SPBC428.08c	ers1	clr4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.164952315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764676	2538690	2540338	275275	276867	SPCC1393.05	SPBC2G2.13c	ers1	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873830075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764677	2538690	2542123	275275	278599	SPCC1393.05	SPAC18G6.15	ers1	mal3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.928943139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764678	2538690	2539999	275275	276543	SPCC1393.05	SPBC1734.15	ers1	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.305206887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764679	2538690	2543118	275275	279550	SPCC1393.05	SPAC3G6.11	ers1	chl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.334786436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764680	2538690	2542651	275275	279105	SPCC1393.05	SPAC24C9.12c	ers1	SPAC24C9.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.347480273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764681	2538690	2542691	275275	279144	SPCC1393.05	SPAC26H5.07c	ers1	SPAC26H5.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.433118299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764682	2538690	2541992	275275	278476	SPCC1393.05	SPAC20G8.07c	ers1	erg2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.331917309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764683	2538690	2542946	275275	279386	SPCC1393.05	SPAC6F12.03c	ers1	fsv1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.82718987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764684	2538690	2543378	275275	279800	SPCC1393.05	SPAC3H8.07c	ers1	pac10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.829658655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764685	2538690	2539958	275275	276502	SPCC1393.05	SPBC1718.07c	ers1	zfs1	-	moc4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.377972234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764686	2538690	2539408	275275	275973	SPCC1393.05	SPCC576.12c	ers1	mhf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573340507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764687	2538690	2539812	275275	276362	SPCC1393.05	SPBC1347.02	ers1	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.541918563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764688	2538690	2538848	275275	275429	SPCC1393.05	SPCC613.12c	ers1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.414334644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764689	2538690	2541017	275275	277532	SPCC1393.05	SPBC36.07	ers1	elp1	-	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326136988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764690	2538690	2541713	275275	278208	SPCC1393.05	SPAC3A12.12	ers1	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.175575713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764691	2538690	2540821	275275	277339	SPCC1393.05	SPBC800.03	ers1	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.694148782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764692	2538690	2542170	275275	278645	SPCC1393.05	SPAC17G8.13c	ers1	mst2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.157387945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764693	2538690	2542806	275275	279254	SPCC1393.05	SPAC1610.01	ers1	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.912793193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764694	2538690	2542198	275275	278673	SPCC1393.05	SPAC6F12.09	ers1	rdp1	-	rdr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.050343764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764695	2538690	2541786	275275	278278	SPCC1393.05	SPAC22F3.08c	ers1	rok1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.498471541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764696	2538690	2541156	275275	277671	SPCC1393.05	SPBC685.07c	ers1	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.316404207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764697	2538690	2539499	275275	276062	SPCC1393.05	SPCC622.08c	ers1	hta1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.599556441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764698	2538690	2541287	275275	277800	SPCC1393.05	SPBP22H7.05c	ers1	abo2	-	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.404646557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764699	2538690	2542516	275275	278974	SPCC1393.05	SPAC2F7.04	ers1	pmc2	-	med1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808152334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764700	2538690	2540498	275275	277026	SPCC1393.05	SPBC27.02c	ers1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.351913088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764701	2538690	2538966	275275	275540	SPCC1393.05	SPCC18.10	ers1	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.594158353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764702	2538690	2540702	275275	277226	SPCC1393.05	SPBC19F8.03c	ers1	yap18	-	SPBC19F8.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.987387231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764703	2538690	2541372	275275	277883	SPCC1393.05	SPBP8B7.28c	ers1	stc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.329760428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764704	2538690	2540115	275275	276652	SPCC1393.05	SPBC1778.02	ers1	rap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.530741516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764705	2538690	2541531	275275	278031	SPCC1393.05	SPAC25A8.01c	ers1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.935696659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764706	2538690	2543437	275275	279857	SPCC1393.05	SPAPB1A10.14	ers1	pof15	-	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.258158713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764707	2538690	2539726	275275	276278	SPCC1393.05	SPBC13E7.08c	ers1	leo1	-	SPBC13E7.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.411778858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764708	2538690	2542021	275275	278504	SPCC1393.05	SPAP14E8.02	ers1	tos4	-	SPAP14E8.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.135455036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764709	2538690	2539700	275275	276253	SPCC1393.05	SPBC1685.15c	ers1	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.270043703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764710	2538690	2543387	275275	279809	SPCC1393.05	SPAPB1E7.02c	ers1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.363128451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764711	2538690	2543327	275275	279750	SPCC1393.05	SPAC1D4.06c	ers1	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.987492675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764712	2538690	2542175	275275	278650	SPCC1393.05	SPAC1F3.02c	ers1	mkh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.510873403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764713	2538690	2542566	275275	279022	SPCC1393.05	SPAC8C9.12c	ers1	SPAC8C9.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.845720599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764714	2538690	2540360	275275	276889	SPCC1393.05	SPBC2G5.01	ers1	SPBC2G5.01	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.884346127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764715	2538690	2543372	275275	279794	SPCC1393.05	SPAPB1A10.09	ers1	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.728117455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764716	2538690	2541529	275275	278029	SPCC1393.05	SPAC1687.13c	ers1	csn5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.050447354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764717	2541972	2542969	278457	279409	SPAC23C11.11	SPAC4G8.10	cka1	gos1	orb5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.692951028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764718	2541972	2541536	278457	278036	SPAC23C11.11	SPAC1071.02	cka1	mms19	orb5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384500341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764719	2541957	2542758	278444	279208	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC15E1.02c	plo1	SPAC15E1.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.41157482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764720	2541957	2543329	278444	279752	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC56F8.02	plo1	SPAC56F8.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87539517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764721	2541957	2542418	278444	278881	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC1805.07c	plo1	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.442257696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764722	2541957	2540122	278444	276659	SPAC23C11.16	SPBC1778.03c	plo1	SPBC1778.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87024773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764723	2541957	2542424	278444	278886	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC1805.14	plo1	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390784001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764724	2541624	2539147	278120	275719	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC622.12c	pst2	gdh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.718464975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764725	2541624	2539788	278120	276338	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC17D1.02	pst2	dph2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979629503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764726	2541624	2539549	278120	276110	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC576.01c	pst2	xan1	-	SPCC576.01c|SPCPB1C11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.681172112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764727	2541624	2542080	278120	278557	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC27D7.03c	pst2	mei2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931980858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764728	2541624	2542518	278120	278976	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC1B3.16c	pst2	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.88432804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764729	2541624	2541399	278120	277908	SPAC23C11.15	SPBPB10D8.01	pst2	SPBPB10D8.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503731704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764730	2541624	2540653	278120	277178	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC215.07c	pst2	SPBC215.07c	-	pdp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.448410687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764731	2541624	2541552	278120	278051	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC1142.08	pst2	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.683927571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764732	2541624	2540524	278120	277052	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC21B10.08c	pst2	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.626962714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764733	2541624	2542358	278120	278823	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC1782.09c	pst2	clp1	-	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.4721317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764734	2541624	2542237	278120	278709	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC19E9.02	pst2	fin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.987159591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764735	2541624	2539930	278120	276474	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC1198.11c	pst2	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.979288764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764736	2541624	2541130	278120	277645	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC776.11	pst2	rpl2801	-	rpl28-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.354353723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764737	2541624	2539939	278120	276483	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC11G11.01	pst2	fis1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258595223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764738	2541624	2539068	278120	275640	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC1442.11c	pst2	SPCC1442.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.070103126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764739	2541624	2541104	278120	277619	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC6B1.03c	pst2	SPBC6B1.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.047400613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764740	2541624	2540410	278120	276938	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC2D10.04	pst2	SPBC2D10.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92402746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764741	2541624	2542798	278120	279246	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC13C5.06c	pst2	mug121	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.833920555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764742	2541624	2540474	278120	277002	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC26H8.09c	pst2	snf59	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871331749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764743	2541624	2540694	278120	277218	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC19C7.10	pst2	bqt4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.825869596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764744	2541624	2543164	278120	279595	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC3G6.06c	pst2	rad2	-	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.629232392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764745	2541624	2538922	278120	275499	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC16C4.10	pst2	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.968826409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764746	2541624	2542103	278120	278579	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC31G5.11	pst2	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.612656116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764747	2541624	2541082	278120	277597	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC577.11	pst2	SPBC577.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.194921514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764748	2541624	2542345	278120	278811	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC1705.02	pst2	SPAC1705.02	-	SPAC1F2.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.685443176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764749	2541624	2542040	278120	278521	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC212.01c	pst2	SPAC212.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.120411727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764750	2541624	2539208	278120	275778	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC1450.11c	pst2	cek1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.475319594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764751	2541624	2539451	278120	276014	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC63.13	pst2	SPCC63.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.164020861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764752	2541624	3361375	278120	280451	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC212.06c	pst2	SPAC212.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.046970549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764753	2541624	3361570	278120	280646	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC750.01	pst2	SPAC750.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.266628122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764754	2541624	2539226	278120	275796	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC16C4.20c	pst2	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.874492871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764755	2541624	2542563	278120	279019	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC1952.11c	pst2	ure2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.769942862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764756	2541624	2542677	278120	279130	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC26F1.10c	pst2	pyp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.34129633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764757	2541624	2539463	278120	276026	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC550.11	pst2	SPCC550.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.076767178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764758	2541624	2542669	278120	279122	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC29B12.08	pst2	clr5	-	SPAC29B12.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.639352979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764759	2541624	2543681	278120	280095	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC9.02c	pst2	SPAC9.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.319595287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764760	2541624	2542569	278120	279025	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC186.08c	pst2	SPAC186.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.70544814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764761	2541624	2539576	278120	276136	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC794.01c	pst2	zwf2	-	SPCC794.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.457011941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764762	2541624	2541964	278120	278450	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC2F3.08	pst2	sut1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.717294419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764763	2541624	2542627	278120	279081	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC750.04c	pst2	SPAC750.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.297195193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764764	2541624	2540095	278120	276633	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC115.03	pst2	SPBC115.03	-	SPBC839.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.605817848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764765	2541624	2539575	278120	276135	SPAC23C11.15	SPCP20C8.02c	pst2	SPCP20C8.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.337807912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764766	2541624	2541558	278120	278057	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC1F7.08	pst2	fio1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.186840551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764767	2541624	2541119	278120	277634	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC651.11c	pst2	apm3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.336289464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764768	2541624	2541227	278120	277741	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC947.05c	pst2	frp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.564183407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764769	2541624	2540790	278120	277309	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC6B1.05c	pst2	atg7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.39117026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764770	2541624	2541323	278120	277835	SPAC23C11.15	SPBP35G2.14	pst2	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.510080851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764771	2541624	2540425	278120	276953	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC27.06c	pst2	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.572594125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764772	2541624	2541424	278120	277929	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC23G3.04	pst2	ies4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2634767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764773	2541624	2539365	278120	275931	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC24B10.16c	pst2	SPCC24B10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.617728909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764774	2541624	2540482	278120	277010	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC25H2.14	pst2	mug16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.631615076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764775	2541624	2543609	278120	280023	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC630.05	pst2	gyp7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.466630443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764776	2541624	2540851	278120	277368	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC4F6.04	pst2	rpl2502	-	rpl23a-2|rpl25b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.142769257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764777	2541624	2542220	278120	278694	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC1A6.03c	pst2	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.32291773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764778	2541624	2540663	278120	277188	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC56F2.06	pst2	mug147	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.54140031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764779	2541624	2541923	278120	278411	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC23C4.09c	pst2	SPAC23C4.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.879539809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764780	2541624	2539961	278120	276505	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC1198.09	pst2	ubc16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.605046291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764781	2541624	2540714	278120	277237	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC19C2.04c	pst2	ubp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388351162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764782	2541624	2541416	278120	277923	SPAC23C11.15	SPBCPT2R1.01c	pst2	SPBCPT2R1.01c	-	SPBPB2B2.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.360386746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764783	2541624	2541663	278120	278159	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC22G7.08	pst2	ppk8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.386585508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764784	2541624	2542213	278120	278687	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC3G6.13c	pst2	rpl4101	-	rpl41-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.475813915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764785	2541624	2539574	278120	276134	SPAC23C11.15	SPCPB16A4.04c	pst2	trm8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503229118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764786	2541624	2541844	278120	278335	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC22A12.17c	pst2	SPAC22A12.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582155801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764787	2541624	2542344	278120	278810	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC1751.01c	pst2	gti1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.061814999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764788	2541624	2541544	278120	278044	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC22G7.06c	pst2	ura1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507654352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764789	2541624	2541339	278120	277850	SPAC23C11.15	SPBP4G3.02	pst2	pho1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.307979024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764790	2541624	2541275	278120	277789	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC947.06c	pst2	SPBC947.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.206640782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764791	2541624	2543514	278120	279932	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC4D7.03	pst2	pop2	-	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.846086242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764792	2541624	2541664	278120	278160	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC2H10.01	pst2	SPAC2H10.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.074106178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764793	2541624	2538738	278120	275321	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC320.14	pst2	sry1	-	SPCC320.14|SPCC330.15c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.688161484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764794	2541624	2540797	278120	277316	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC18H10.11c	pst2	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330022663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764795	2541624	2540631	278120	277157	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC25B2.10	pst2	SPBC25B2.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.72121191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764796	2541624	2542484	278120	278944	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC1A6.07	pst2	sle1	-	SPAC1A6.07|seg1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.682143946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764797	2541624	2542513	278120	278971	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC1952.05	pst2	gcn5	-	kat2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.41331094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764798	2541624	2543144	278120	279576	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC3F10.05c	pst2	mug113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.842599284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764799	2541624	2542249	278120	278719	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC30D11.14c	pst2	SPAC30D11.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.766185834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764800	2541624	3361491	278120	280567	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC1805.08	pst2	dlc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.694556604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764801	2541624	2540338	278120	276867	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC2G2.13c	pst2	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.053268386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764802	2541624	2542990	278120	279428	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC11D3.16c	pst2	SPAC11D3.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.130957961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764803	2541624	2540396	278120	276924	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC31F10.12	pst2	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.414347237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764804	2541624	2540150	278120	276687	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC16E9.14c	pst2	zrg17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.983529061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764805	2541624	2538800	278120	275381	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC1322.06	pst2	kap113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.646525188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764806	2541624	2542428	278120	278890	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC1805.12c	pst2	uep1	-	ubi2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.757399024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764807	2541624	2543667	278120	280081	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC4H3.02c	pst2	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.974142581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764808	2541624	2541388	278120	277899	SPAC23C11.15	SPBP8B7.30c	pst2	thi5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.485165906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764809	2541624	2542925	278120	279366	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC11E3.04c	pst2	ubc13	-	spu13|sst5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.179361992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764810	2541624	2541183	278120	277697	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC725.14	pst2	arg6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.050562354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764811	2541624	2539689	278120	276244	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC1861.03	pst2	mak10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.272902173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764812	2541624	2543358	278120	279780	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC688.10	pst2	rev3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.498726016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764813	2541624	2542357	278120	278822	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC1782.07	pst2	qcr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.561027106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764814	2541624	2542651	278120	279105	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC24C9.12c	pst2	SPAC24C9.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.353700007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764815	2541624	2540661	278120	277186	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC23E6.03c	pst2	nta1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321553223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764816	2541624	2542691	278120	279144	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC26H5.07c	pst2	SPAC26H5.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.049005409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764817	2541624	2543406	278120	279828	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC9.12c	pst2	atp12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576997252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764818	2541624	2539667	278120	276222	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC13G1.08c	pst2	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.924384595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764819	2541624	2539000	278120	275574	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC1450.06c	pst2	grx3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.368980384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764820	2541624	2543389	278120	279811	SPAC23C11.15	SPAPB1A11.02	pst2	SPAPB1A11.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.608569849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764821	2541624	2542946	278120	279386	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC6F12.03c	pst2	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.050516534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764822	2541624	2540751	278120	277273	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC20F10.10	pst2	psl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388786943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764823	2541624	2539815	278120	276365	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC1105.02c	pst2	lys4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.504258253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764824	2541624	2539974	278120	276518	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC32H8.07	pst2	git5	-	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.460940669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764825	2541624	2540232	278120	276764	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC336.10c	pst2	tif512	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.560136954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764826	2541624	2538935	278120	275511	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC1682.11c	pst2	ctl1	-	SPCC1682.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.983314853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764827	2541624	2542214	278120	278688	SPAC23C11.15	SPACUNK4.11c	pst2	mpp6	-	SPACUNK4.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323476699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764828	2541624	2543301	278120	279726	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC977.17	pst2	SPAC977.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.085932791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764829	2541624	2542855	278120	279301	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC144.04c	pst2	spe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.990106263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764830	2541624	2542519	278120	278977	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC19G12.08	pst2	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.317696011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764831	2541624	5802861	278120	857999	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC1D4.01	pst2	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.057853464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764832	2541624	2540387	278120	276915	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC24C6.04	pst2	SPBC24C6.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.631410795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764833	2541624	2538824	278120	275405	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC1442.14c	pst2	hnt1	-	SPCC1442.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.369012959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764834	2541624	2543561	278120	279977	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC922.04	pst2	SPAC922.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.631063806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764835	2541624	2540201	278120	276734	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC13A2.04c	pst2	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.268665786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764836	2541624	2541939	278120	278426	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC23C4.07	pst2	tht2	-	mug22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.618446569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764837	2541624	2541464	278120	277966	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC222.08c	pst2	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.007634935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764838	2541624	2539402	278120	275967	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC613.03	pst2	SPCC613.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.259933775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764839	2541624	2543307	278120	279731	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC694.05c	pst2	rps2502	-	rps25|rps25-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984551316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764840	2541624	2543059	278120	279493	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC30.04c	pst2	abc4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.437533211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764841	2541624	2541410	278120	277918	SPAC23C11.15	SPBPB2B2.17c	pst2	SPBPB2B2.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51272693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764842	2541624	2542597	278120	279051	SPAC23C11.15	SPAP8A3.07c	pst2	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381307636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764843	2541624	2542267	278120	278736	SPAC23C11.15	SPAPYUK71.03c	pst2	syn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382074088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764844	2541624	2541406	278120	277914	SPAC23C11.15	SPBPB2B2.07c	pst2	SPBPB2B2.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.065005463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764845	2541624	3361470	278120	280546	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC3G9.01	pst2	nsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647190662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764846	2541624	2540104	278120	276641	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC1709.16c	pst2	SPBC1709.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.43986129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764847	2541624	2538828	278120	275409	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC1020.05	pst2	SPCC1020.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.097566569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764848	2541624	2542753	278120	279203	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC1687.09	pst2	SPAC1687.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.885466471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764849	2541624	2541283	278120	277796	SPAC23C11.15	SPBP8B7.02	pst2	rng9	-	SPBP8B7.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.921699059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764850	2541624	2540850	278120	277367	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC18A7.02c	pst2	SPBC18A7.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.386564797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764851	2541624	2541266	278120	277780	SPAC23C11.15	SPBP16F5.05c	pst2	yar1	-	SPBP16F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.149240617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764852	2541624	2540533	278120	277061	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC29A10.16c	pst2	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.972489554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764853	2541624	3361030	278120	280106	SPAC23C11.15	SPCP20C8.03	pst2	SPCP20C8.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.120872146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764854	2541624	2538690	278120	275275	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC1393.05	pst2	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.196947832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764855	2541624	2542255	278120	278725	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC57A7.08	pst2	pzh1	-	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516500422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764856	2541624	2539993	278120	276537	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC1105.05	pst2	exg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.088187576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764857	2541624	2543049	278120	279484	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC1296.04	pst2	mug65	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.847838809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764858	2541624	2542958	278120	279398	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC12G12.09	pst2	SPAC12G12.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440581773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764859	2541624	2540937	278120	277453	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC359.05	pst2	abc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.128687518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764860	2541624	2543139	278120	279571	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC12G12.03	pst2	cip2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.456436418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764861	2541624	2539964	278120	276508	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC1773.03c	pst2	SPBC1773.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042805156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764862	2541624	2542595	278120	279049	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC186.06	pst2	SPAC186.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.549508745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764863	2541624	2538848	278120	275429	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC613.12c	pst2	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.475230813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764864	2541624	2541762	278120	278256	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC139.01c	pst2	SPAC139.01c	-	SPAC955.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392690103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764865	2541624	2542625	278120	279079	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC24H6.11c	pst2	SPAC24H6.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.768508653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764866	2541624	2543113	278120	279545	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC3F10.07c	pst2	erf4	-	mug91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.23003013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764867	2541624	2542992	278120	279430	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC1071.09c	pst2	SPAC1071.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.503610959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764868	2541624	2538762	278120	275345	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC306.04c	pst2	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.34361764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764869	2541624	2539101	278120	275673	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC736.04c	pst2	gma12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877390518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764870	2541624	2540809	278120	277328	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC18A7.01	pst2	SPBC18A7.01	-	SPBC4F6.19c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709246965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764871	2541624	2542327	278120	278793	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC16C9.06c	pst2	upf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.957730396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764872	2541624	2541981	278120	278466	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC23A1.04c	pst2	mnl1	-	htm1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871710985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764873	2541624	2541121	278120	277636	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC609.03	pst2	iqw1	-	iqwd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389976959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764874	2541624	2540648	278120	277173	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC1921.05	pst2	ape2	-	ape1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.908418689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764875	2541624	2540800	278120	277319	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC409.20c	pst2	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.048870162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764876	2541624	2538717	278120	275301	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC1235.02	pst2	bio2	-	SPCC320.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.917411959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764877	2541624	2539159	278120	275731	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC1235.01	pst2	SPCC1235.01	-	SPCC320.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.843033508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764878	2541624	2540702	278120	277226	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC19F8.03c	pst2	yap18	-	SPBC19F8.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580904278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764879	2541624	2543130	278120	279562	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC869.05c	pst2	SPAC869.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.618406412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764880	2541624	2541100	278120	277615	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC651.04	pst2	SPBC651.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.213833901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764881	2541624	2542472	278120	278933	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC9E9.13	pst2	wos2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.630466551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764882	2541624	2540115	278120	276652	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC1778.02	pst2	rap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64839259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764883	2541624	2539346	278120	275912	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC569.04	pst2	SPCC569.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446697344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764884	2541624	2541367	278120	277878	SPAC23C11.15	SPBP8B7.13	pst2	vac7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447089482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764885	2541624	2540421	278120	276949	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC2D10.19c	pst2	alb1	-	SPBC2D10.19c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699487808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764886	2541624	2542306	278120	278773	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC29A4.11	pst2	rga3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511422353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764887	2541624	2539029	278120	275602	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC61.05	pst2	SPCC61.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.702130862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764888	2541624	2540304	278120	276834	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC354.13	pst2	rga6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197007868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764889	2541624	2540829	278120	277347	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC800.09	pst2	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.113327442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764890	2541624	2541229	278120	277743	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC839.05c	pst2	rps1701	-	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.012591341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764891	2541624	2539729	278120	276281	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC11B10.07c	pst2	ivn1	-	pi004|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807277541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764892	2541624	2543091	278120	279524	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC12G12.15	pst2	sif3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702737257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764893	2541624	2542934	278120	279375	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC10F6.07c	pst2	mug94	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.50885743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764894	2541624	2543602	278120	280017	SPAC23C11.15	SPAPB1A11.04c	pst2	mca1	-	SPAPB1A11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994543787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764895	2541624	2540516	278120	277044	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC21C3.01c	pst2	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.337047503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764896	2541624	2541789	278120	278281	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC23H4.08	pst2	iwr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449869381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764897	2541624	2540267	278120	276798	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC32C12.03c	pst2	ppk25	-	kin2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.184448135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764898	2541624	2538795	278120	275376	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC1884.01	pst2	SPCC1884.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.004023449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764899	2541624	2540928	278120	277444	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC3E7.10	pst2	fma1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.361112038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764900	2541624	2542250	278120	278720	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC17D4.03c	pst2	cis4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.294213748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764901	2541624	2540936	278120	277452	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC800.05c	pst2	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.06433435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764902	2541624	2538694	278120	275279	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC191.09c	pst2	gst1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.999318066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764903	2541624	2542309	278120	278775	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC16A10.02	pst2	sub1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985452874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764904	2541624	2539736	278120	276288	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC12C2.12c	pst2	glo1	-	SPBC21D10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.686649068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764905	2541624	2540489	278120	277017	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC25H2.03	pst2	SPBC25H2.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.270505012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764906	2541624	2540333	278120	276863	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC21B10.07	pst2	SPBC21B10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258099534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764907	2541624	2539920	278120	276464	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC119.08	pst2	pmk1	-	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.773165944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764908	2541624	2540896	278120	277412	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC19C2.13c	pst2	ctu2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57439139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764909	2541624	2539189	278120	275760	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC1682.16	pst2	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.980324626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764910	2541624	2539178	278120	275749	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC1682.14	pst2	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981781178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764911	2541624	2541398	278120	277907	SPAC23C11.15	SPBPB2B2.11	pst2	SPBPB2B2.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197544991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764912	2541624	2539169	278120	275740	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC1235.11	pst2	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699268064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764913	2541624	2541238	278120	277752	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC8E4.05c	pst2	SPBC8E4.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.084000365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764914	2541624	3361165	278120	280241	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC1348.12	pst2	SPBC1348.12	-	SPAC1348.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.136261056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764915	2541624	2543513	278120	279931	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC821.06	pst2	spn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445863415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764916	2541624	2539700	278120	276253	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC1685.15c	pst2	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.104366635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764917	2541624	2543384	278120	279806	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC637.06	pst2	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986217114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764918	2541624	2540766	278120	277286	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC19C2.02	pst2	pmt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326674748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764919	2541624	2538854	278120	275435	SPAC23C11.15	SPCP1E11.05c	pst2	are2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.686271069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764920	2541624	2540173	278120	276706	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC106.13	pst2	SPBC106.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.986042612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764921	2541624	2540558	278120	277085	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC2D10.17	pst2	clr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.50471569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764922	2541624	2538869	278120	275449	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC777.02	pst2	SPCC777.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.871837381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764923	2541624	2542424	278120	278886	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC1805.14	pst2	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.43550687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764924	2541624	2541869	278120	278359	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC22F3.13	pst2	tsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.041034132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764925	2541624	2541502	278120	278004	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC23D3.04c	pst2	gpd2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632383601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764926	2541624	2541080	278120	277595	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC557.04	pst2	ppk29	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.133073064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764927	2541624	2541177	278120	277691	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC725.05c	pst2	SPBC725.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576447776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764928	2541624	2541576	278120	278073	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC1348.02	pst2	SPBC1348.02	-	SPAC1348.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.942524529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764929	2541624	2542594	278120	279048	SPAC23C11.15	SPACUNK4.10	pst2	SPACUNK4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.056040387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764930	2541624	2540208	278120	276741	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC9B6.03	pst2	SPBC9B6.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.806141816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764931	2541624	2541116	278120	277631	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC609.04	pst2	caf5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.344904617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764932	2541624	2539001	278120	275575	SPAC23C11.15	SPCC1494.08c	pst2	SPCC1494.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.383521237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764933	2541624	2542609	278120	279063	SPAC23C11.15	SPAC31G5.04	pst2	lys12	-	SPAC31G5.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503932193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764934	2541624	2540649	278120	277174	SPAC23C11.15	SPBC19F8.08	pst2	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.414740922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764935	2543544	2543164	279961	279595	SPAC664.07c	SPAC3G6.06c	rad9	rad2	-	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.985650108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764936	2543544	2540945	279961	277461	SPAC664.07c	SPBC342.06c	rad9	rtt109	-	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.025781281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764937	2543544	2541923	279961	278411	SPAC664.07c	SPAC23C4.09c	rad9	SPAC23C4.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.342751017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764938	2543544	2539381	279961	275947	SPAC664.07c	SPCC1739.10	rad9	mug33	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330433751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764939	2543544	2542036	279961	278518	SPAC664.07c	SPAC23A1.19c	rad9	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.038185457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764940	2543544	2540348	279961	276877	SPAC664.07c	SPBC29A10.05	rad9	exo1	-	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.868314676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764941	2543544	2540338	279961	276867	SPAC664.07c	SPBC2G2.13c	rad9	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.00285945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764942	2543544	2540352	279961	276881	SPAC664.07c	SPBC215.03c	rad9	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.476072602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764943	2543544	2543245	279961	279673	SPAC664.07c	SPAC56F8.06c	rad9	alg10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574777964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764944	2543544	2539974	279961	276518	SPAC664.07c	SPBC32H8.07	rad9	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980965576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764945	2543544	2540232	279961	276764	SPAC664.07c	SPBC336.10c	rad9	tif512	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.324207829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764946	2543544	2539215	279961	275785	SPAC664.07c	SPCC285.16c	rad9	msh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.249779613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764947	2543544	2541746	279961	278240	SPAC664.07c	SPAC20G4.04c	rad9	hus1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984129415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764948	2543544	2542574	279961	279030	SPAC664.07c	SPAC186.05c	rad9	SPAC186.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817355371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764949	2543544	2543633	279961	280047	SPAC664.07c	SPAC3H8.05c	rad9	mms1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323569652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764950	2543544	2540481	279961	277009	SPAC664.07c	SPBC2D10.12	rad9	rhp23	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.940671155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764951	2543544	2542424	279961	278886	SPAC664.07c	SPAC1805.14	rad9	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378825485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764952	2541098	2540956	277613	277472	SPBC577.13	SPBC409.06	syj2	uch2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392418718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764953	2541098	2538806	277613	275387	SPBC577.13	SPCC1840.09	syj2	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389679562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764954	2541098	2541119	277613	277634	SPBC577.13	SPBC651.11c	syj2	apm3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.523789194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764955	2541098	2540467	277613	276995	SPBC577.13	SPBC2G2.07c	syj2	mug178	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934581762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764956	2541098	2539898	277613	276444	SPBC577.13	SPBC12D12.07c	syj2	trx2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441052151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764957	2541098	2539293	277613	275861	SPBC577.13	SPCC553.08c	syj2	ria1	-	SPCC553.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812126733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764958	2541098	2541828	277613	278319	SPBC577.13	SPAC22H12.05c	syj2	fsc1	-	SPAC22H12.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771423544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764959	2541098	2542431	277613	278893	SPBC577.13	SPAC1A6.01c	syj2	SPAC1A6.01c	-	SPAC23C4.20c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922881851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764960	2541098	2542549	277613	279006	SPBC577.13	SPAC19A8.11c	syj2	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776023718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764961	2541098	2541186	277613	277700	SPBC577.13	SPBC725.01	syj2	SPBC725.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783556819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764962	2541098	2539101	277613	275673	SPBC577.13	SPCC736.04c	syj2	gma12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385802604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764963	2541098	2543304	277613	279728	SPBC577.13	SPAC6B12.12	syj2	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.718105266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764964	2541098	2542716	277613	279169	SPBC577.13	SPAC25H1.07	syj2	emc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708100512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764965	2539893	2539050	276439	275623	SPBC1539.10	SPCC11E10.08	nop16	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325838062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764966	2539893	2541911	276439	278401	SPBC1539.10	SPAC212.04c	nop16	SPAC212.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574442685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764967	2539893	2539293	276439	275861	SPBC1539.10	SPCC553.08c	nop16	ria1	-	SPCC553.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.246289546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764968	2539893	2542710	276439	279163	SPBC1539.10	SPAC750.08c	nop16	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63203116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764969	2539893	2542759	276439	279209	SPBC1539.10	SPAC9G1.07	nop16	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707332004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764970	2539893	2539555	276439	276116	SPBC1539.10	SPCC4B3.08	nop16	lsg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390669555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764971	2539893	2542943	276439	279384	SPBC1539.10	SPBC1348.03	nop16	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.818137806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764972	2539893	2541297	276439	277809	SPBC1539.10	SPBC9B6.07	nop16	nop52	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.909885381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764973	2539567	2542207	276127	278682	SPCC70.06	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC70.06	ddb1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.869785718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764974	2539567	2539147	276127	275719	SPCC70.06	SPCC622.12c	SPCC70.06	gdh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.693620404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764975	2539567	2540524	276127	277052	SPCC70.06	SPBC21B10.08c	SPCC70.06	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.849617893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764976	2539567	2539227	276127	275797	SPCC70.06	SPCC191.11	SPCC70.06	inv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445472289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764977	2539567	2542747	276127	279197	SPCC70.06	SPAC15A10.06	SPCC70.06	SPAC15A10.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443741085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764978	2539567	2540029	276127	276573	SPCC70.06	SPBC16A3.01	SPCC70.06	spn3	-	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.63108973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764979	2539567	2540425	276127	276953	SPCC70.06	SPBC27.06c	SPCC70.06	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.438177172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764980	2539567	2542220	276127	278694	SPCC70.06	SPAC1A6.03c	SPCC70.06	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.853198677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764981	2539567	2540263	276127	276794	SPCC70.06	SPBC32H8.02c	SPCC70.06	nep2	-	mug120|pi021|SPACTOKYO_453.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.557025614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764982	2539567	2539961	276127	276505	SPCC70.06	SPBC1198.09	SPCC70.06	ubc16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441396621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764983	2539567	2542082	276127	278559	SPCC70.06	SPAC29B12.10c	SPCC70.06	pgt1	-	opt1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443748361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764984	2539567	2541522	276127	278023	SPCC70.06	SPAC23E2.01	SPCC70.06	fep1	-	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.127687109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764985	2539567	2542791	276127	279240	SPCC70.06	SPAC167.04	SPCC70.06	pam17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.570033926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764986	2539567	2541258	276127	277772	SPCC70.06	SPBC8E4.01c	SPCC70.06	SPBC8E4.01c	-	SPBP4G3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.850828856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764987	2539567	2542861	276127	279307	SPCC70.06	SPAC13G7.13c	SPCC70.06	msa1	-	SPAC6C3.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517144466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764988	2539567	2543495	276127	279914	SPCC70.06	SPAC513.03	SPCC70.06	mfm2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.31899088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764989	2539567	2542855	276127	279301	SPCC70.06	SPAC144.04c	SPCC70.06	spe1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810643777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764990	2539567	2539027	276127	275600	SPCC70.06	SPCC1322.08	SPCC70.06	srk1	-	mkp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.499689883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764991	2539567	2543683	276127	280097	SPCC70.06	SPAPB1E7.04c	SPCC70.06	SPAPB1E7.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635304326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764992	2539567	2540001	276127	276545	SPCC70.06	SPBC1289.13c	SPCC70.06	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580859403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764993	2539567	3361193	276127	280269	SPCC70.06	SPBC19G7.18c	SPCC70.06	SPBC19G7.18c	-	SPBC19G7.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.263604265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764994	2539567	2543437	276127	279857	SPCC70.06	SPAPB1A10.14	SPCC70.06	pof15	-	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.878064347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764995	2539567	2541380	276127	277891	SPCC70.06	SPBPB2B2.13	SPCC70.06	gal1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852670018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764996	2539567	2539169	276127	275740	SPCC70.06	SPCC1235.11	SPCC70.06	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.766955057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764997	2539567	2541238	276127	277752	SPCC70.06	SPBC8E4.05c	SPCC70.06	SPBC8E4.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576690463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764998	2539567	2541062	276127	277577	SPCC70.06	SPBC660.11	SPCC70.06	tcg1	-	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.473090139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
764999	2539567	2543616	276127	280030	SPCC70.06	SPAC4A8.09c	SPCC70.06	cwf21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.137284726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765000	2539567	2543024	276127	279460	SPCC70.06	SPAC1039.02	SPCC70.06	SPAC1039.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.817390172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765001	2540636	2538721	277162	275305	SPBC211.05	SPCC1494.10	sap10	adn3	sab10	SPCC70.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.620986242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765002	2540636	2540833	277162	277351	SPBC211.05	SPBC18H10.20c	sap10	any1	sab10	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707381692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765003	2540636	2539452	277162	276015	SPBC211.05	SPCC70.03c	sap10	SPCC70.03c	sab10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.908204943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765004	2540636	2542468	277162	278929	SPBC211.05	SPAC1D4.09c	sap10	rtf2	sab10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.850431274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765005	2540636	2538770	277162	275353	SPBC211.05	SPCC1753.02c	sap10	git3	sab10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.69395948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765006	2540636	2540673	277162	277198	SPBC211.05	SPBC1D7.03	sap10	mug80	sab10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.086799011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765007	2540636	2539999	277162	276543	SPBC211.05	SPBC1734.15	sap10	rsc4	sab10	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.456590644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765008	2540636	2543643	277162	280057	SPBC211.05	SPAC3G9.07c	sap10	hos2	sab10	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.496905515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765009	2540636	2541899	277162	278389	SPBC211.05	SPAC22E12.11c	sap10	set3	sab10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.315522813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765010	2540636	2542126	277162	278602	SPBC211.05	SPAC1B3.05	sap10	not3	sab10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381514058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765011	2540636	2540997	277162	277513	SPBC211.05	SPBC3H7.06c	sap10	pof9	sab10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.832510124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765012	2540636	2539974	277162	276518	SPBC211.05	SPBC32H8.07	sap10	git5	sab10	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781462954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765013	2540636	2541720	277162	278214	SPBC211.05	SPAC23H3.13c	sap10	gpa2	sab10	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.994947713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765014	2540636	2539953	277162	276497	SPBC211.05	SPBC1709.11c	sap10	png2	sab10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.626303857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765015	2540636	2541389	277162	277900	SPBC211.05	SPBPB2B2.09c	sap10	SPBPB2B2.09c	sab10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.408924191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765016	2540636	2540193	277162	276726	SPBC211.05	SPBC1289.10c	sap10	adn2	sab10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.470212329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765017	2540636	2539772	277162	276323	SPBC211.05	SPBC1734.05c	sap10	spf31	sab10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.568096055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765018	2540636	2543387	277162	279809	SPBC211.05	SPAPB1E7.02c	sap10	mcl1	sab10	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.810450019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765019	2540636	2540766	277162	277286	SPBC211.05	SPBC19C2.02	sap10	pmt1	sab10	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.790452763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765020	2542255	2539050	278725	275623	SPAC57A7.08	SPCC11E10.08	pzh1	rik1	phz1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.22154938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765021	2542255	2539147	278725	275719	SPAC57A7.08	SPCC622.12c	pzh1	gdh1	phz1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925620146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765022	2542255	2541512	278725	278013	SPAC57A7.08	SPAC11E3.08c	pzh1	nse6	phz1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64179038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765023	2542255	2540913	278725	277429	SPAC57A7.08	SPBC56F2.08c	pzh1	SPBC56F2.08c	phz1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.120794562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765024	2542255	2542378	278725	278842	SPAC57A7.08	SPAC1805.04	pzh1	nup132	phz1	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.477975647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765025	2542255	2542613	278725	279067	SPAC57A7.08	SPAC18B11.03c	pzh1	SPAC18B11.03c	phz1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812772205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765026	2542255	2539420	278725	275985	SPAC57A7.08	SPCC970.07c	pzh1	raf2	phz1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.549598314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765027	2542255	2539434	278725	275997	SPAC57A7.08	SPCC757.09c	pzh1	rnc1	phz1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.623642166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765028	2542255	2540727	278725	277250	SPAC57A7.08	SPBC1921.03c	pzh1	mex67	phz1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.057482146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765029	2542255	2542022	278725	278505	SPAC57A7.08	SPAC23A1.03	pzh1	apt1	phz1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852087207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765030	2542255	2540425	278725	276953	SPAC57A7.08	SPBC27.06c	pzh1	mgr2	phz1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.449573432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765031	2542255	2541923	278725	278411	SPAC57A7.08	SPAC23C4.09c	pzh1	SPAC23C4.09c	phz1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193544716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765032	2542255	2539244	278725	275814	SPAC57A7.08	SPCC1672.06c	pzh1	asp1	phz1	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.003679648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765033	2542255	2543584	278725	279999	SPAC57A7.08	SPAPB1E7.11c	pzh1	SPAPB1E7.11c	phz1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.646578589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765034	2542255	2538906	278725	275483	SPAC57A7.08	SPCC1259.03	pzh1	rpa12	phz1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.399245251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765035	2542255	2540825	278725	277343	SPAC57A7.08	SPBC428.08c	pzh1	clr4	phz1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.94005755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765036	2542255	2542239	278725	278711	SPAC57A7.08	SPAC18G6.02c	pzh1	chp1	phz1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319648896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765037	2542255	2542036	278725	278518	SPAC57A7.08	SPAC23A1.19c	pzh1	hrq1	phz1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.816748061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765038	2542255	2538821	278725	275402	SPAC57A7.08	SPCC584.01c	pzh1	SPCC584.01c	phz1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876752683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765039	2542255	2542513	278725	278971	SPAC57A7.08	SPAC1952.05	pzh1	gcn5	phz1	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391496241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765040	2542255	2541776	278725	278270	SPAC57A7.08	SPAC23H3.05c	pzh1	swd1	phz1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.163997659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765041	2542255	2538770	278725	275353	SPAC57A7.08	SPCC1753.02c	pzh1	git3	phz1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.195809247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765042	2542255	2540338	278725	276867	SPAC57A7.08	SPBC2G2.13c	pzh1	dcd1	phz1	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635576219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765043	2542255	2540352	278725	276881	SPAC57A7.08	SPBC215.03c	pzh1	csn1	phz1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043035586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765044	2542255	2543412	278725	279834	SPAC57A7.08	SPAC637.07	pzh1	moe1	phz1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.381662166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765045	2542255	2540086	278725	276624	SPAC57A7.08	SPBC16H5.12c	pzh1	SPBC16H5.12c	phz1	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986774072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765046	2542255	2543250	278725	279678	SPAC57A7.08	SPAC3G9.15c	pzh1	fcf2	phz1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.102985411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765047	2542255	2543396	278725	279818	SPAC57A7.08	SPAC4D7.11	pzh1	dsc4	phz1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512223183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765048	2542255	2539667	278725	276222	SPAC57A7.08	SPBC13G1.08c	pzh1	ash2	phz1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.616381575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765049	2542255	2542007	278725	278490	SPAC57A7.08	SPAC20H4.07	pzh1	rad57	phz1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.524935972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765050	2542255	2541720	278725	278214	SPAC57A7.08	SPAC23H3.13c	pzh1	gpa2	phz1	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4960404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765051	2542255	2541241	278725	277755	SPAC57A7.08	SPBC887.17	pzh1	SPBC887.17	phz1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.848357921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765052	2542255	2542597	278725	279051	SPAC57A7.08	SPAP8A3.07c	pzh1	SPAP8A3.07c	phz1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.448824047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765053	2542255	2540882	278725	277399	SPAC57A7.08	SPBC4F6.08c	pzh1	mrpl39	phz1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712268541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765054	2542255	2543193	278725	279622	SPAC57A7.08	SPAC3F10.11c	pzh1	abc2	phz1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874093952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765055	2542255	2538848	278725	275429	SPAC57A7.08	SPCC613.12c	pzh1	raf1	phz1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.983808273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765056	2542255	2539160	278725	275732	SPAC57A7.08	SPCC18.17c	pzh1	SPCC18.17c	phz1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.375321903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765057	2542255	2540442	278725	276970	SPAC57A7.08	SPBC25B2.04c	pzh1	mtg1	phz1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.317687776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765058	2542255	2539101	278725	275673	SPAC57A7.08	SPCC736.04c	pzh1	gma12	phz1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323967974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765059	2542255	2543619	278725	280033	SPAC57A7.08	SPAC4F10.04	pzh1	ypa1	phz1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.739961885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765060	2542255	2539555	278725	276116	SPAC57A7.08	SPCC4B3.08	pzh1	lsg1	phz1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927369157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765061	2542255	2540498	278725	277026	SPAC57A7.08	SPBC27.02c	pzh1	ask1	phz1	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.251777144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765062	2542255	2542883	278725	279328	SPAC57A7.08	SPAC1486.04c	pzh1	alm1	phz1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44518341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765063	2542255	2540702	278725	277226	SPAC57A7.08	SPBC19F8.03c	pzh1	yap18	phz1	SPBC19F8.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149485174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765064	2542255	2541531	278725	278031	SPAC57A7.08	SPAC25A8.01c	pzh1	fft3	phz1	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.554985409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765065	2542255	2540699	278725	277223	SPAC57A7.08	SPBC800.08	pzh1	gcd10	phz1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.191918388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765066	2542255	2542418	278725	278881	SPAC57A7.08	SPAC1805.07c	pzh1	dad2	phz1	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712401253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765067	2542255	2538916	278725	275493	SPAC57A7.08	SPCC16C4.17	pzh1	mug123	phz1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571295471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765068	2542255	2539668	278725	276223	SPAC57A7.08	SPBC11B10.10c	pzh1	pht1	phz1	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.02865754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765069	2542255	2539205	278725	275775	SPAC57A7.08	SPCC4B3.15	pzh1	mid1	phz1	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.865237059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765070	2542255	2540140	278725	276677	SPAC57A7.08	SPBC16C6.08c	pzh1	qcr6	phz1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32125262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765071	2542255	2539375	278725	275941	SPAC57A7.08	SPCC4G3.11	pzh1	mug154	phz1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.973978956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765072	2542255	2539178	278725	275749	SPAC57A7.08	SPCC1682.14	pzh1	rpl1902	phz1	rpl19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639830451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765073	2542255	2543337	278725	279760	SPAC57A7.08	SPAC959.08	pzh1	rpl2102	phz1	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.646670037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765074	2542255	2541806	278725	278297	SPAC57A7.08	SPAC4G8.13c	pzh1	prz1	phz1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.054451065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765075	2542255	2543387	278725	279809	SPAC57A7.08	SPAPB1E7.02c	pzh1	mcl1	phz1	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.783239215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765076	2542255	2541627	278725	278123	SPAC57A7.08	SPAC1F5.08c	pzh1	yam8	phz1	ehs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771973986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765077	2542255	2543448	278725	279868	SPAC57A7.08	SPAC3H5.07	pzh1	rpl702	phz1	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.383534636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765078	2542255	2542617	278725	279071	SPAC57A7.08	SPAC13A11.01c	pzh1	rga8	phz1	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.903967362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765079	2542255	2541062	278725	277577	SPAC57A7.08	SPBC660.11	pzh1	tcg1	phz1	mug187	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.116736418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765080	2542255	2540649	278725	277174	SPAC57A7.08	SPBC19F8.08	pzh1	rps401	phz1	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037261993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765081	2539104	2541117	275676	277632	SPCC1223.10c	SPBC646.13	eaf1	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640246096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765082	2539104	2542345	275676	278811	SPCC1223.10c	SPAC1705.02	eaf1	SPAC1705.02	-	SPAC1F2.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092909839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765083	2539104	2539226	275676	275796	SPCC1223.10c	SPCC16C4.20c	eaf1	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809915294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765084	2539104	2542107	275676	278583	SPCC1223.10c	SPAC30.01c	eaf1	sec72	-	sec7b|sec702	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038368095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765085	2539104	2539023	275676	275596	SPCC1223.10c	SPCC594.05c	eaf1	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383125473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765086	2539104	2540797	275676	277316	SPCC1223.10c	SPBC18H10.11c	eaf1	ppr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992019849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765087	2539104	2542439	275676	278901	SPCC1223.10c	SPAC17A5.08	eaf1	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449096087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765088	2539104	2541156	275676	277671	SPCC1223.10c	SPBC685.07c	eaf1	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577167818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765089	2539104	2540800	275676	277319	SPCC1223.10c	SPBC409.20c	eaf1	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504047368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765090	2539104	2542716	275676	279169	SPCC1223.10c	SPAC25H1.07	eaf1	emc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.337409487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765091	2539104	2540309	275676	276839	SPCC1223.10c	SPBC21B10.13c	eaf1	yox1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513346326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765092	2539104	2543472	275676	279892	SPCC1223.10c	SPAC959.04c	eaf1	omh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.762118226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765093	2539104	2543501	275676	279919	SPCC1223.10c	SPAC664.14	eaf1	amt2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807185537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765094	2543514	2542207	279932	278682	SPAC4D7.03	SPAC17H9.10c	pop2	ddb1	sud1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.034927498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765095	2543514	2540913	279932	277429	SPAC4D7.03	SPBC56F2.08c	pop2	SPBC56F2.08c	sud1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.565212724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765096	2543514	2541135	279932	277650	SPAC4D7.03	SPBC839.03c	pop2	SPBC839.03c	sud1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.12108502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765097	2543514	2539930	279932	276474	SPAC4D7.03	SPBC1198.11c	pop2	reb1	sud1	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.419293074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765098	2543514	2540664	279932	277189	SPAC4D7.03	SPBC215.02	pop2	bob1	sud1	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.890840856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765099	2543514	2538806	279932	275387	SPAC4D7.03	SPCC1840.09	pop2	SPCC1840.09	sud1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.516811508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765100	2543514	2539420	279932	275985	SPAC4D7.03	SPCC970.07c	pop2	raf2	sud1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.782740186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765101	2543514	2542107	279932	278583	SPAC4D7.03	SPAC30.01c	pop2	sec72	sud1	sec7b|sec702	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.607766213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765102	2543514	2541208	279932	277722	SPAC4D7.03	SPBC887.04c	pop2	lub1	sud1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.936451565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765103	2543514	2538801	279932	275382	SPAC4D7.03	SPCC285.13c	pop2	nup60	sud1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.922599212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765104	2543514	2539576	279932	276136	SPAC4D7.03	SPCC794.01c	pop2	zwf2	sud1	SPCC794.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.472609371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765105	2543514	2539434	279932	275997	SPAC4D7.03	SPCC757.09c	pop2	rnc1	sud1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.362292478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765106	2543514	2540463	279932	276991	SPAC4D7.03	SPBC2F12.15c	pop2	pfa3	sud1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.065517463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765107	2543514	2543563	279932	279979	SPAC4D7.03	SPAC664.02c	pop2	arp8	sud1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.841476331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765108	2543514	2543584	279932	279999	SPAC4D7.03	SPAPB1E7.11c	pop2	SPAPB1E7.11c	sud1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.164035207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765109	2543514	2538906	279932	275483	SPAC4D7.03	SPCC1259.03	pop2	rpa12	sud1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.71038641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765110	2543514	2540825	279932	277343	SPAC4D7.03	SPBC428.08c	pop2	clr4	sud1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.074799748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765111	2543514	2540964	279932	277480	SPAC4D7.03	SPBC365.16	pop2	SPBC365.16	sud1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.497875994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765112	2543514	2542036	279932	278518	SPAC4D7.03	SPAC23A1.19c	pop2	hrq1	sud1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.432073038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765113	2543514	2542311	279932	278777	SPAC4D7.03	SPAC16A10.05c	pop2	dad1	sud1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.617232807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765114	2543514	2542177	279932	278652	SPAC4D7.03	SPAC17H9.08	pop2	SPAC17H9.08	sud1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.610825713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765115	2543514	2540352	279932	276881	SPAC4D7.03	SPBC215.03c	pop2	csn1	sud1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.265111113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765116	2543514	2542469	279932	278930	SPAC4D7.03	SPAC19A8.04	pop2	erg5	sud1	cyp61	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039265128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765117	2543514	2540997	279932	277513	SPAC4D7.03	SPBC3H7.06c	pop2	pof9	sud1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.304233566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765118	2543514	2540374	279932	276903	SPAC4D7.03	SPBC31F10.02	pop2	SPBC31F10.02	sud1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19862109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765119	2543514	2543301	279932	279726	SPAC4D7.03	SPAC977.17	pop2	SPAC977.17	sud1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.410524976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765120	2543514	2540019	279932	276563	SPAC4D7.03	SPBC1685.01	pop2	pmp1	sud1	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.115415192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765121	2543514	2543193	279932	279622	SPAC4D7.03	SPAC3F10.11c	pop2	abc2	sud1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.072135589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765122	2543514	2538848	279932	275429	SPAC4D7.03	SPCC613.12c	pop2	raf1	sud1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.43926483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765123	2543514	2541628	279932	278124	SPAC4D7.03	SPAC110.02	pop2	pds5	sud1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.965547237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765124	2543514	2540498	279932	277026	SPAC4D7.03	SPBC27.02c	pop2	ask1	sud1	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.620508209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765125	2543514	2543304	279932	279728	SPAC4D7.03	SPAC6B12.12	pop2	tom70	sud1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.741965738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765126	2543514	2541531	279932	278031	SPAC4D7.03	SPAC25A8.01c	pop2	fft3	sud1	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.815214293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765127	2543514	2542418	279932	278881	SPAC4D7.03	SPAC1805.07c	pop2	dad2	sud1	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.0228426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765128	2543514	2541789	279932	278281	SPAC4D7.03	SPAC23H4.08	pop2	iwr1	sud1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.564719563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765129	2543514	2541115	279932	277630	SPAC4D7.03	SPBC660.07	pop2	ntp1	sud1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.937553556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765130	2543514	2542021	279932	278504	SPAC4D7.03	SPAP14E8.02	pop2	tos4	sud1	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.091297398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765131	2543514	2538792	279932	275373	SPAC4D7.03	SPCP1E11.10	pop2	SPCP1E11.10	sud1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.539083032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765132	2543514	2539700	279932	276253	SPAC4D7.03	SPBC1685.15c	pop2	klp6	sud1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.058905318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765133	2543514	2540309	279932	276839	SPAC4D7.03	SPBC21B10.13c	pop2	yox1	sud1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.57288199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765134	2543514	2540736	279932	277259	SPAC4D7.03	SPBC19F8.02	pop2	SPBC19F8.02	sud1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.42330781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765135	2539726	2542895	276278	279339	SPBC13E7.08c	SPAC13G6.10c	leo1	asl1	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988482255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765136	2539726	2540105	276278	276642	SPBC13E7.08c	SPBC106.04	leo1	ada1	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.562139424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765137	2539726	2543064	276278	279497	SPBC13E7.08c	SPAC3G6.01	leo1	hrp3	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.187544063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765138	2539726	2541771	276278	278265	SPBC13E7.08c	SPAC23H3.06	leo1	apl6	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.557070847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765139	2539726	2538847	276278	275428	SPBC13E7.08c	SPCC594.06c	leo1	SPCC594.06c	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.27316552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765140	2539726	2542273	276278	278742	SPBC13E7.08c	SPAC17H9.13c	leo1	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.496197041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765141	2539726	2539249	276278	275819	SPBC13E7.08c	SPCC1450.05c	leo1	rox3	SPBC13E7.08c	med19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.800141194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765142	2539726	2539434	276278	275997	SPBC13E7.08c	SPCC757.09c	leo1	rnc1	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.741608141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765143	2539726	2540929	276278	277445	SPBC13E7.08c	SPBC354.03	leo1	swd3	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.204552483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765144	2539726	2541119	276278	277634	SPBC13E7.08c	SPBC651.11c	leo1	apm3	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.583833712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765145	2539726	2540463	276278	276991	SPBC13E7.08c	SPBC2F12.15c	leo1	pfa3	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.390537115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765146	2539726	2542277	276278	278746	SPBC13E7.08c	SPAC17A5.02c	leo1	dbr1	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.965781664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765147	2539726	2541250	276278	277764	SPBC13E7.08c	SPBC8D2.17	leo1	gmh4	SPBC13E7.08c	SPBC8D2.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.050316962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765148	2539726	2538770	276278	275353	SPBC13E7.08c	SPCC1753.02c	leo1	git3	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442916787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765149	2539726	2540673	276278	277198	SPBC13E7.08c	SPBC1D7.03	leo1	mug80	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.558059323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765150	2539726	2541496	276278	277998	SPBC13E7.08c	SPAC23D3.09	leo1	arp42	SPBC13E7.08c	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.221594894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765151	2539726	2541310	276278	277822	SPBC13E7.08c	SPBP18G5.03	leo1	toc1	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.854367894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765152	2539726	2542857	276278	279303	SPBC13E7.08c	SPAC144.06	leo1	apl5	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.895970012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765153	2539726	2542946	276278	279386	SPBC13E7.08c	SPAC6F12.03c	leo1	fsv1	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.441121691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765154	2539726	2543443	276278	279863	SPBC13E7.08c	SPAC3H1.12c	leo1	snt2	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.307658224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765155	2539726	2541614	276278	278111	SPBC13E7.08c	SPAC29A4.20	leo1	elp3	SPBC13E7.08c	kat9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.156611267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765156	2539726	2538690	276278	275275	SPBC13E7.08c	SPCC1393.05	leo1	ers1	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.411778858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765157	2539726	2543619	276278	280033	SPBC13E7.08c	SPAC4F10.04	leo1	ypa1	SPBC13E7.08c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.056489097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765158	2539726	2540498	276278	277026	SPBC13E7.08c	SPBC27.02c	leo1	ask1	SPBC13E7.08c	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.09615525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765159	2539726	2542418	276278	278881	SPBC13E7.08c	SPAC1805.07c	leo1	dad2	SPBC13E7.08c	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.362818171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765160	2539726	2541224	276278	277738	SPBC13E7.08c	SPBC418.01c	leo1	his4	SPBC13E7.08c	SPBC887.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.124923985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765161	2539726	2539668	276278	276223	SPBC13E7.08c	SPBC11B10.10c	leo1	pht1	SPBC13E7.08c	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.669612768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765162	2539726	2540064	276278	276602	SPBC13E7.08c	SPBC1718.02	leo1	hop1	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441318258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765163	2539726	2540555	276278	277082	SPBC13E7.08c	SPBP16F5.02	leo1	mcs2	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.352026481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765164	2539726	2541941	276278	278428	SPBC13E7.08c	SPAC20H4.03c	leo1	tfs1	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.084267379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765165	2539726	2540787	276278	277306	SPBC13E7.08c	SPBC1921.07c	leo1	sgf29	SPBC13E7.08c	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.881806591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765166	2541746	2539405	278240	275970	SPAC20G4.04c	SPCC553.03	hus1	pex1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.332849694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765167	2541746	3361499	278240	280575	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC25H1.09	hus1	mde5	-	SPAC4A8.01|meu30	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095824465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765168	2541746	2542390	278240	278854	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC6F6.11c	hus1	SPAC6F6.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.89600957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765169	2541746	2540435	278240	276963	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC25B2.03	hus1	SPBC25B2.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262310716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765170	2541746	2540026	278240	276570	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC16D10.08c	hus1	hsp104	-	SPBC16D10.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147413563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765171	2541746	2539749	278240	276301	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC16A3.13	hus1	meu7	-	aah4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.406267081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765172	2541746	2540956	278240	277472	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC409.06	hus1	uch2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.429078089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765173	2541746	2540653	278240	277178	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC215.07c	hus1	SPBC215.07c	-	pdp2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.122951963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765174	2541746	2538985	278240	275559	SPAC20G4.04c	SPCC13B11.03c	hus1	SPCC13B11.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988106945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765175	2541746	2540068	278240	276606	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC1734.12c	hus1	alg12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.45760925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765176	2541746	2540296	278240	276827	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC2D10.05	hus1	exg3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.768020692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765177	2541746	2541051	278240	277566	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC3E7.08c	hus1	rad13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.307969003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765178	2541746	2543164	278240	279595	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC3G6.06c	hus1	rad2	-	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.043172844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765179	2541746	2542614	278240	279068	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC1399.04c	hus1	SPAC1399.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573210614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765180	2541746	2542071	278240	278548	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC26H5.03	hus1	pcf2	-	cac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700079241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765181	2541746	2542613	278240	279067	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC18B11.03c	hus1	SPAC18B11.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.266809688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765182	2541746	2540535	278240	277062	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC215.01	hus1	SPBC215.01	-	SPBC3B9.20	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205404852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765183	2541746	2539210	278240	275780	SPAC20G4.04c	SPCC2H8.05c	hus1	dbl1	-	SPCC2H8.05c|SPCC63.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575507845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765184	2541746	2541086	278240	277601	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC685.04c	hus1	aps2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983987255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765185	2541746	2542816	278240	279263	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC4G8.11c	hus1	atp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.505232104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765186	2541746	2543230	278240	279658	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC823.13c	hus1	SPAC823.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.562244366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765187	2541746	2543288	278240	279713	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC6C3.03c	hus1	SPAC6C3.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.146746502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765188	2541746	2543260	278240	279688	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC1002.17c	hus1	urg2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.269971889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765189	2541746	2540945	278240	277461	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC342.06c	hus1	rtt109	-	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.14227275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765190	2541746	2543383	278240	279805	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC869.08	hus1	pcm2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989016143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765191	2541746	2540692	278240	277217	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC800.07c	hus1	tsf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325578393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765192	2541746	2541346	278240	277857	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBP8B7.08c	hus1	ppm1	-	SPBP8B7.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.562600849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765193	2541746	2541227	278240	277741	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC947.05c	hus1	frp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.619119329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765194	2541746	2541560	278240	278059	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC24B11.12c	hus1	SPAC24B11.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455312411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765195	2541746	2543685	278240	280099	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC3C7.03c	hus1	rad55	-	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.54595222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765196	2541746	2542220	278240	278694	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC1A6.03c	hus1	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.158065779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765197	2541746	2539981	278240	276525	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC1289.09	hus1	tim21	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92693842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765198	2541746	2540127	278240	276664	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC106.20	hus1	exo70	-	SPBC582.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.716834949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765199	2541746	2539100	278240	275672	SPAC20G4.04c	SPCC330.12c	hus1	sdh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.741302358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765200	2541746	2543319	278240	279743	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC6B12.09	hus1	trm10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.582673791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765201	2541746	2542033	278240	278515	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC2C4.09	hus1	SPAC2C4.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.410123941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765202	2541746	2541275	278240	277789	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC947.06c	hus1	SPBC947.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866522969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765203	2541746	2543349	278240	279771	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC977.02	hus1	SPAC977.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.542063812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765204	2541746	2539870	278240	276416	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC1709.18	hus1	tif452	-	SPBC409.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933030989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765205	2541746	2541801	278240	278292	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC2F7.08c	hus1	snf5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.82912514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765206	2541746	2543375	278240	279797	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC3H1.08c	hus1	SPAC3H1.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.564486014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765207	2541746	2540903	278240	277419	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC530.05	hus1	prt1	-	SPBC530.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.329004962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765208	2541746	2538770	278240	275353	SPAC20G4.04c	SPCC1753.02c	hus1	git3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.97666351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765209	2541746	2540348	278240	276877	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC29A10.05	hus1	exo1	-	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.367337275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765210	2541746	2540338	278240	276867	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC2G2.13c	hus1	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.146321733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765211	2541746	2542123	278240	278599	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC18G6.15	hus1	mal3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932692999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765212	2541746	2539754	278240	276306	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC16C6.04	hus1	dbl6	-	SPBC16C6.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037500128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765213	2541746	2542983	278240	279421	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC11D3.15	hus1	SPAC11D3.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256563951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765214	2541746	2539046	278240	275619	SPAC20G4.04c	SPCC1223.12c	hus1	meu10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379819899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765215	2541746	2539073	278240	275645	SPAC20G4.04c	SPCC1322.02	hus1	pxd1	-	SPCC1322.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037023674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765216	2541746	2543510	278240	279928	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC30D11.07	hus1	nth1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.606397709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765217	2541746	2541109	278240	277624	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC6B1.02	hus1	ppk30	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.849024387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765218	2541746	2541496	278240	277998	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC23D3.09	hus1	arp42	-	arp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.229128721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765219	2541746	2539624	278240	276181	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC1289.16c	hus1	cao2	-	SPBC8E4.06|spao2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.645585872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765220	2541746	3361269	278240	280345	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC31A8.01c	hus1	rtn1	-	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.763814018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765221	2541746	2540628	278240	277154	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC25B2.08	hus1	SPBC25B2.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.342625055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765222	2541746	2542007	278240	278490	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC20H4.07	hus1	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.2166882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765223	2541746	2538945	278240	275519	SPAC20G4.04c	SPCC1739.06c	hus1	SPCC1739.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096407446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765224	2541746	2542946	278240	279386	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC6F12.03c	hus1	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.254022584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765225	2541746	2542419	278240	278882	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC17G6.05c	hus1	bro1	-	SPAC17G6.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039117106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765226	2541746	2542498	278240	278957	SPAC20G4.04c	SPACUNK4.16c	hus1	SPACUNK4.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.552957106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765227	2541746	2540077	278240	276615	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC17D11.04c	hus1	nto1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.192197477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765228	2541746	2541248	278240	277762	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC8D2.10c	hus1	rmt3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327778229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765229	2541746	2540374	278240	276903	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC31F10.02	hus1	SPBC31F10.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.276425411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765230	2541746	2540318	278240	276848	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC30B4.04c	hus1	sol1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.981464525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765231	2541746	2542437	278240	278899	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC17A5.01	hus1	pex6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.151002104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765232	2541746	2542055	278240	278534	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC6G9.03c	hus1	mug183	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.249836547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765233	2541746	2539368	278240	275934	SPAC20G4.04c	SPCC16A11.07	hus1	coq10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.824260611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765234	2541746	2542008	278240	278491	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC2G11.07c	hus1	ptc3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.231086354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765235	2541746	2541112	278240	277627	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC725.07	hus1	pex5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931407281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765236	2541746	2541464	278240	277966	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC222.08c	hus1	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094361218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765237	2541746	2540967	278240	277483	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC36B7.08c	hus1	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.940312369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765238	2541746	2543331	278240	279754	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC56E4.07	hus1	SPAC56E4.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871188153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765239	2541746	2539711	278240	276264	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC1683.09c	hus1	frp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.337822644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765240	2541746	3361105	278240	280181	SPAC20G4.04c	SPCC188.10c	hus1	SPCC188.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.270265369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765241	2541746	2542829	278240	279276	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC13D6.02c	hus1	byr3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.917158985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765242	2541746	2543477	278240	279897	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAPB2B4.04c	hus1	SPAPB2B4.04c	-	pmc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036366084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765243	2541746	2539812	278240	276362	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC1347.02	hus1	fkbp39	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.721324809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765244	2541746	3361134	278240	280210	SPAC20G4.04c	SPCC737.09c	hus1	hmt1	-	SPCC74.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.20043768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765245	2541746	2541628	278240	278124	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC110.02	hus1	pds5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.188323385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765246	2541746	2541713	278240	278208	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC3A12.12	hus1	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.894953854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765247	2541746	2539908	278240	276454	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC13E7.06	hus1	msd1	-	mug172	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.936949672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765248	2541746	2539706	278240	276259	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC16G5.13	hus1	ptf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.908149555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765249	2541746	2541409	278240	277917	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC1271.06c	hus1	mug96	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.661717494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765250	2541746	2542992	278240	279430	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC1071.09c	hus1	SPAC1071.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875362196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765251	2541746	2542286	278240	278754	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC1786.01c	hus1	ptl2	-	SPAC1786.01c|SPAC31G5.20c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.563015606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765252	2541746	2543071	278240	279504	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC3C7.06c	hus1	pit1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.923426082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765253	2541746	2541175	278240	277689	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC839.13c	hus1	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984206399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765254	2541746	2540061	278240	276599	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC119.12	hus1	rud3	-	SPBC119.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.921678688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765255	2541746	2540121	278240	276658	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC119.14	hus1	rti1	-	rad22B	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.352039458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765256	2541746	2538761	278240	275344	SPAC20G4.04c	SPCC622.02	hus1	SPCC622.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149653583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765257	2541746	2539108	278240	275680	SPAC20G4.04c	SPCC1223.02	hus1	nmt1	-	thi3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.337216584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765258	2541746	2542883	278240	279328	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC1486.04c	hus1	alm1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.269141999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765259	2541746	2542401	278240	278865	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC1142.02c	hus1	SPAC1142.02c	-	SPAC17G6.19c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.270278709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765260	2541746	2539030	278240	275603	SPAC20G4.04c	SPCP1E11.02	hus1	ppk38	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.850803733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765261	2541746	2543304	278240	279728	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC6B12.12	hus1	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.864439618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765262	2541746	2540960	278240	277476	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC3D6.02	hus1	but2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.561550851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765263	2541746	2543136	278240	279568	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC1348.07	hus1	SPBC1348.07	-	SPAC1348.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.197709795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765264	2541746	2543096	278240	279528	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC977.05c	hus1	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.544023209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765265	2541746	2540531	278240	277059	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC23E6.08	hus1	sat1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448036439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765266	2541746	2541279	278240	277792	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC8E4.03	hus1	SPBC8E4.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.182850165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765267	2541746	2539614	278240	276172	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC17D11.08	hus1	SPBC17D11.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.020900146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765268	2541746	2541358	278240	277869	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBP4H10.16c	hus1	SPBP4H10.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.937394452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765269	2541746	2540891	278240	277407	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC582.08	hus1	SPBC582.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.743759421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765270	2541746	3361329	278240	280405	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC25H2.10c	hus1	SPBC25H2.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.795731506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765271	2541746	2542403	278240	278867	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC19A8.05c	hus1	sst4	-	vps27	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.508134568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765272	2541746	2539514	278240	276076	SPAC20G4.04c	SPCC663.14c	hus1	trp663	-	SPCC663.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51399629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765273	2541746	2543091	278240	279524	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC12G12.15	hus1	sif3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.540045375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765274	2541746	2543228	278240	279656	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC6B12.04c	hus1	SPAC6B12.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51591243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765275	2541746	2539188	278240	275759	SPAC20G4.04c	SPCC1827.04	hus1	vms1	-	SPCC1827.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.225567053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765276	2541746	2543183	278240	279612	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC3A12.06c	hus1	SPAC3A12.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.083545928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765277	2541746	2539488	278240	276051	SPAC20G4.04c	SPCC645.08c	hus1	snd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990873133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765278	2541746	2541115	278240	277630	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC660.07	hus1	ntp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.819376552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765279	2541746	2539207	278240	275777	SPAC20G4.04c	SPCC285.09c	hus1	cgs2	-	pde1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.870309946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765280	2541746	3361476	278240	280552	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC16A10.04	hus1	rho4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149175845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765281	2541746	2542386	278240	278850	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC1805.01c	hus1	ppk6	-	SPAPJ736.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.745115213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765282	2541746	2541244	278240	277758	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC8D2.02c	hus1	vps68	-	SPBC8D2.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875819763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765283	2541746	2540489	278240	277017	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC25H2.03	hus1	SPBC25H2.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.852572746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765284	2541746	3361117	278240	280193	SPAC20G4.04c	SPCC663.17	hus1	wtf15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876624296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765285	2541746	2540896	278240	277412	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC19C2.13c	hus1	ctu2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770177145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765286	2541746	2543525	278240	279943	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC4A8.14	hus1	SPAC4A8.14	-	prs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05734602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765287	2541746	3361410	278240	280486	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC1527.01	hus1	mok11	-	SPAC23D3.15	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574791201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765288	2541746	2541357	278240	277868	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBPB7E8.01	hus1	SPBPB7E8.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.507533758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765289	2541746	2539181	278240	275752	SPAC20G4.04c	SPCC622.14	hus1	SPCC622.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149514444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765290	2541746	2543387	278240	279809	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAPB1E7.02c	hus1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320906766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765291	2541746	2543587	278240	280002	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC4D7.02c	hus1	SPAC4D7.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.910642504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765292	2541746	2540481	278240	277009	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC2D10.12	hus1	rhp23	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442304443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765293	2541746	2540167	278240	276702	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC1683.04	hus1	SPBC1683.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.237549779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765294	2541746	2541080	278240	277595	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC557.04	hus1	ppk29	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.084185167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765295	2541746	2540309	278240	276839	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC21B10.13c	hus1	yox1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.197259961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765296	2541746	2543624	278240	280038	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC4D7.06c	hus1	SPAC4D7.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.803353681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765297	2541746	2542943	278240	279384	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC1348.03	hus1	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64009037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765298	2541746	2538822	278240	275403	SPAC20G4.04c	SPCC1840.02c	hus1	bgs4	-	cwg1|orb11|pbr1|sph1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.400836297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765299	2541746	2540310	278240	276840	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC29B5.04c	hus1	SPBC29B5.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820519646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765300	2541746	2541236	278240	277750	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC887.11	hus1	pus2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.711437968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765301	2541746	2539494	278240	276057	SPAC20G4.04c	SPCC4G3.08	hus1	psk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.263596039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765302	2541746	2539001	278240	275575	SPAC20G4.04c	SPCC1494.08c	hus1	SPCC1494.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092100832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765303	2541746	2539292	278240	275860	SPAC20G4.04c	SPCC4G3.02	hus1	aph1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04565731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765304	2543011	2540913	279449	277429	SPAC10F6.11c	SPBC56F2.08c	atg17	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.167091752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765305	2543011	2540131	279449	276668	SPAC10F6.11c	SPBC1778.05c	atg17	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932750827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765306	2543011	2542103	279449	278579	SPAC10F6.11c	SPAC31G5.11	atg17	pac2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810731215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765307	2543011	2541361	279449	277872	SPAC10F6.11c	SPBP8B7.10c	atg17	utp16	-	SPBP8B7.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.032588405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765308	2543011	3361570	279449	280646	SPAC10F6.11c	SPAC750.01	atg17	SPAC750.01	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924821922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765309	2543011	2541013	279449	277528	SPAC10F6.11c	SPBC3H7.13	atg17	far10	-	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.942202354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765310	2543011	2542513	279449	278971	SPAC10F6.11c	SPAC1952.05	atg17	gcn5	-	kat2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.306540563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765311	2543011	2540831	279449	277349	SPAC10F6.11c	SPBC428.02c	atg17	eca39	-	SPBC582.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581365519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765312	2543011	2542014	279449	278497	SPAC10F6.11c	SPAC20H4.04	atg17	fml2	-	mfh2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.051481537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765313	2543011	2542549	279449	279006	SPAC10F6.11c	SPAC19A8.11c	atg17	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205081294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765314	2543011	2540229	279449	276761	SPAC10F6.11c	SPBC31F10.15c	atg17	atp15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.8197107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765315	2543011	2542829	279449	279276	SPAC10F6.11c	SPAC13D6.02c	atg17	byr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578858192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765316	2543011	2540643	279449	277168	SPAC10F6.11c	SPBC19G7.06	atg17	mbx1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.845430738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765317	2543011	2540001	279449	276545	SPAC10F6.11c	SPBC1289.13c	atg17	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811708889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765318	2543011	2543619	279449	280033	SPAC10F6.11c	SPAC4F10.04	atg17	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.93006536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765319	2543011	2541175	279449	277689	SPAC10F6.11c	SPBC839.13c	atg17	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.557935275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765320	2543011	2541229	279449	277743	SPAC10F6.11c	SPBC839.05c	atg17	rps1701	-	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380968098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765321	2543011	2543044	279449	279479	SPAC10F6.11c	SPAC3C7.12	atg17	tip1	-	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.305874265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765322	2538741	2542577	275324	279033	SPCC11E10.05c	SPAC19G12.15c	ynd1	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643815724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765323	2538741	2541834	275324	278325	SPCC11E10.05c	SPAC824.08	ynd1	gda1	-	gdp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.359626648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765324	2538741	2542357	275324	278822	SPCC11E10.05c	SPAC1782.07	ynd1	qcr8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991781992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765325	2538741	2540836	275324	277354	SPCC11E10.05c	SPBC18H10.19	ynd1	vps38	-	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38595226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765326	2538741	2542519	275324	278977	SPCC11E10.05c	SPAC19G12.08	ynd1	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.70848718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765327	2538741	2540533	275324	277061	SPCC11E10.05c	SPBC29A10.16c	ynd1	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.7476303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765328	2538741	2542283	275324	278751	SPCC11E10.05c	SPAC27F1.08	ynd1	pdt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.054444002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765329	2538741	2538756	275324	275339	SPCC11E10.05c	SPCC1795.10c	ynd1	SPCC1795.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.837029483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765330	2538741	2541806	275324	278297	SPCC11E10.05c	SPAC4G8.13c	ynd1	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.690014938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765331	2538741	2541478	275324	277980	SPCC11E10.05c	SPAC2F7.17	ynd1	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.331870958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765332	3361433	2540474	280509	277002	SPAC1071.12c	SPBC26H8.09c	stp1	snf59	SPAC926.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042961949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765333	2541943	2539420	278430	275985	SPAC222.07c	SPCC970.07c	hri2	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.659703765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765334	2541943	2541013	278430	277528	SPAC222.07c	SPBC3H7.13	hri2	far10	-	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.071469936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765335	2541943	2542311	278430	278777	SPAC222.07c	SPAC16A10.05c	hri2	dad1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205043305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765336	2541943	2542398	278430	278862	SPAC222.07c	SPAC1805.03c	hri2	trm13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.02664248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765337	2541943	2539481	278430	276044	SPAC222.07c	SPCC622.16c	hri2	epe1	-	kdm2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.00135006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765338	2541943	2541175	278430	277689	SPAC222.07c	SPBC839.13c	hri2	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634372632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765339	2541943	2539925	278430	276469	SPAC222.07c	SPBC16H5.13	hri2	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.478044599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765340	2541943	2541789	278430	278281	SPAC222.07c	SPAC23H4.08	hri2	iwr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.755589802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765341	2541943	2539014	278430	275587	SPAC222.07c	SPCC18B5.05c	hri2	SPCC18B5.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.45226829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765342	2542489	2542207	278948	278682	SPAC589.08c	SPAC17H9.10c	dam1	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.814661199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765343	2542489	2542862	278948	279308	SPAC589.08c	SPAC140.03	dam1	arb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440561107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765344	2542489	2540060	278948	276598	SPAC589.08c	SPBC106.01	dam1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.270087589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765345	2542489	2542518	278948	278976	SPAC589.08c	SPAC1B3.16c	dam1	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.912204115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765346	2542489	2541512	278948	278013	SPAC589.08c	SPAC11E3.08c	dam1	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.748083873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765347	2542489	2539452	278948	276015	SPAC589.08c	SPCC70.03c	dam1	SPCC70.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.784748445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765348	2542489	2542066	278948	278543	SPAC589.08c	SPAC227.05	dam1	SPAC227.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.693227432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765349	2542489	2542787	278948	279236	SPAC589.08c	SPAC9G1.08c	dam1	SPAC9G1.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.333386936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765350	2542489	2542358	278948	278823	SPAC589.08c	SPAC1782.09c	dam1	clp1	-	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.412193006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765351	2542489	2543524	278948	279942	SPAC589.08c	SPAC4D7.07c	dam1	csi2	-	SPAC4D7.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.601225304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765352	2542489	2542237	278948	278709	SPAC589.08c	SPAC19E9.02	dam1	fin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.899580856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765353	2542489	2539930	278948	276474	SPAC589.08c	SPBC1198.11c	dam1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.457818146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765354	2542489	3361561	278948	280637	SPAC589.08c	SPAC11E3.01c	dam1	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.202084969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765355	2542489	2540161	278948	276696	SPAC589.08c	SPBC13E7.03c	dam1	SPBC13E7.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.735755206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765356	2542489	2542502	278948	278960	SPAC589.08c	SPAC139.06	dam1	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572072903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765357	2542489	2540694	278948	277218	SPAC589.08c	SPBC19C7.10	dam1	bqt4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.569566863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765358	2542489	2538922	278948	275499	SPAC589.08c	SPCC16C4.10	dam1	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.398576305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765359	2542489	2539309	278948	275876	SPAC589.08c	SPCC4G3.19	dam1	alp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.008682761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765360	2542489	2540664	278948	277189	SPAC589.08c	SPBC215.02	dam1	bob1	-	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.567690437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765361	2542489	3361436	278948	280512	SPAC589.08c	SPAC1296.01c	dam1	SPAC1296.01c	-	SPAC22F3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.133392276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765362	2542489	2539226	278948	275796	SPAC589.08c	SPCC16C4.20c	dam1	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383653808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765363	2542489	2541200	278948	277714	SPAC589.08c	SPBC8D2.03c	dam1	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.690882843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765364	2542489	2542468	278948	278929	SPAC589.08c	SPAC1D4.09c	dam1	rtf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.614825894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765365	2542489	2541208	278948	277722	SPAC589.08c	SPBC887.04c	dam1	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.879548936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765366	2542489	2538847	278948	275428	SPAC589.08c	SPCC594.06c	dam1	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.336610202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765367	2542489	2541471	278948	277973	SPAC589.08c	SPAC1F5.03c	dam1	SPAC1F5.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.995776578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765368	2542489	2542816	278948	279263	SPAC589.08c	SPAC4G8.11c	dam1	atp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449783266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765369	2542489	2539463	278948	276026	SPAC589.08c	SPCC550.11	dam1	SPCC550.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.27823004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765370	2542489	2540945	278948	277461	SPAC589.08c	SPBC342.06c	dam1	rtt109	-	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329682992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765371	2542489	2542848	278948	279294	SPAC589.08c	SPAC9G1.03c	dam1	rpl3001	-	rpl30|rpl30-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.549320409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765372	2542489	2539434	278948	275997	SPAC589.08c	SPCC757.09c	dam1	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.399831238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765373	2542489	2541026	278948	277541	SPAC589.08c	SPBC337.09	dam1	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.486057355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765374	2542489	2542012	278948	278495	SPAC589.08c	SPAC23C11.02c	dam1	rps23	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.833250015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765375	2542489	2541323	278948	277835	SPAC589.08c	SPBP35G2.14	dam1	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.393538622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765376	2542489	2540425	278948	276953	SPAC589.08c	SPBC27.06c	dam1	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.801534246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765377	2542489	2541424	278948	277929	SPAC589.08c	SPAC23G3.04	dam1	ies4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.260475687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765378	2542489	2542318	278948	278784	SPAC589.08c	SPAC16C9.05	dam1	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.240990653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765379	2542489	2541560	278948	278059	SPAC589.08c	SPAC24B11.12c	dam1	SPAC24B11.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.272147998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765380	2542489	2542277	278948	278746	SPAC589.08c	SPAC17A5.02c	dam1	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.070835819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765381	2542489	2541580	278948	278077	SPAC589.08c	SPAC1687.05	dam1	pli1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.702002927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765382	2542489	2543108	278948	279540	SPAC589.08c	SPAC3A12.13c	dam1	SPAC3A12.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.914893429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765383	2542489	2539244	278948	275814	SPAC589.08c	SPCC1672.06c	dam1	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.825365962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765384	2542489	2543563	278948	279979	SPAC589.08c	SPAC664.02c	dam1	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.226176517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765385	2542489	2543426	278948	279846	SPAC589.08c	SPAC631.02	dam1	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.752373356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765386	2542489	2538906	278948	275483	SPAC589.08c	SPCC1259.03	dam1	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.27646123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765387	2542489	2542791	278948	279240	SPAC589.08c	SPAC167.04	dam1	pam17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387061291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765388	2542489	2540825	278948	277343	SPAC589.08c	SPBC428.08c	dam1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.571041529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765389	2542489	2541021	278948	277536	SPAC589.08c	SPBC3B8.10c	dam1	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.990238297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765390	2542489	2541544	278948	278044	SPAC589.08c	SPAC22G7.06c	dam1	ura1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.202376289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765391	2542489	2542268	278948	278737	SPAC589.08c	SPAC17A5.07c	dam1	ulp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.40600668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765392	2542489	2542036	278948	278518	SPAC589.08c	SPAC23A1.19c	dam1	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.111311458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765393	2542489	2539467	278948	276030	SPAC589.08c	SPCC417.07c	dam1	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.948011269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765394	2542489	2543514	278948	279932	SPAC589.08c	SPAC4D7.03	dam1	pop2	-	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.945482115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765395	2542489	2542177	278948	278652	SPAC589.08c	SPAC17H9.08	dam1	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.332065555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765396	2542489	2538821	278948	275402	SPAC589.08c	SPCC584.01c	dam1	SPCC584.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.00276286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765397	2542489	2543445	278948	279865	SPAC589.08c	SPAC4F10.13c	dam1	mpd2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.410546414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765398	2542489	2542776	278948	279225	SPAC589.08c	SPAC167.01	dam1	ire1	-	ppk4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507838167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765399	2542489	2540338	278948	276867	SPAC589.08c	SPBC2G2.13c	dam1	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.462058301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765400	2542489	2538706	278948	275290	SPAC589.08c	SPCC338.08	dam1	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.076129384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765401	2542489	2540396	278948	276924	SPAC589.08c	SPBC31F10.12	dam1	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.261378175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765402	2542489	2538800	278948	275381	SPAC589.08c	SPCC1322.06	dam1	kap113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.352159584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765403	2542489	2541578	278948	278075	SPAC589.08c	SPAC25B8.05	dam1	deg1	-	SPAC25B8.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.055239833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765404	2542489	2539219	278948	275789	SPAC589.08c	SPCC1795.01c	dam1	mad3	-	SPCC895.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.595393455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765405	2542489	2541532	278948	278032	SPAC589.08c	SPAC2C4.15c	dam1	ubx2	-	ucp13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.564402218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765406	2542489	2541899	278948	278389	SPAC589.08c	SPAC22E12.11c	dam1	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.085849094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765407	2542489	2539586	278948	276145	SPAC589.08c	SPCC70.08c	dam1	SPCC70.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.651527398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765408	2542489	2540231	278948	276763	SPAC589.08c	SPBC336.14c	dam1	ppk26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.013234721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765409	2542489	2541710	278948	278205	SPAC589.08c	SPAC343.11c	dam1	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.088359946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765410	2542489	2539667	278948	276222	SPAC589.08c	SPBC13G1.08c	dam1	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.304516192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765411	2542489	2542126	278948	278602	SPAC589.08c	SPAC1B3.05	dam1	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.97168493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765412	2542489	2542007	278948	278490	SPAC589.08c	SPAC20H4.07	dam1	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0669514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765413	2542489	2540751	278948	277273	SPAC589.08c	SPBC20F10.10	dam1	psl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.187655228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765414	2542489	2542976	278948	279414	SPAC589.08c	SPAC9E9.09c	dam1	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.961303789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765415	2542489	2539974	278948	276518	SPAC589.08c	SPBC32H8.07	dam1	git5	-	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.862111383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765416	2542489	2543378	278948	279800	SPAC589.08c	SPAC3H8.07c	dam1	pac10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.854916594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765417	2542489	2541900	278948	278390	SPAC589.08c	SPAC23H4.17c	dam1	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.058682164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765418	2542489	2539408	278948	275973	SPAC589.08c	SPCC576.12c	dam1	mhf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.737554454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765419	2542489	2541009	278948	277524	SPAC589.08c	SPBC428.04	dam1	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.262484151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765420	2542489	5802861	278948	857999	SPAC589.08c	SPAC1D4.01	dam1	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.900468057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765421	2542489	2543443	278948	279863	SPAC589.08c	SPAC3H1.12c	dam1	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.74055482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765422	2542489	2541389	278948	277900	SPAC589.08c	SPBPB2B2.09c	dam1	SPBPB2B2.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.447895811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765423	2542489	2541464	278948	277966	SPAC589.08c	SPAC222.08c	dam1	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.832253752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765424	2542489	2543307	278948	279731	SPAC589.08c	SPAC694.05c	dam1	rps2502	-	rps25|rps25-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.268480248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765425	2542489	2539847	278948	276395	SPAC589.08c	SPBC530.14c	dam1	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.39901289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765426	2542489	2540599	278948	277125	SPAC589.08c	SPBC29A3.10c	dam1	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.202932731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765427	2542489	2540844	278948	277361	SPAC589.08c	SPBC1921.04c	dam1	SPBC1921.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32086642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765428	2542489	2541488	278948	277990	SPAC589.08c	SPAC227.17c	dam1	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.360081604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765429	2542489	2540193	278948	276726	SPAC589.08c	SPBC1289.10c	dam1	adn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441767113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765430	2542489	2541337	278948	277848	SPAC589.08c	SPBP35G2.13c	dam1	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.215981625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765431	2542489	2539527	278948	276089	SPAC589.08c	SPCC338.16	dam1	pof3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.425773933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765432	2542489	2539519	278948	276081	SPAC589.08c	SPCC364.05	dam1	vps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.050588436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765433	2542489	2540589	278948	277115	SPAC589.08c	SPBC20F10.06	dam1	mad2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.320146267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765434	2542489	3361520	278948	280596	SPAC589.08c	SPAC1610.02c	dam1	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.425592433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765435	2542489	2542725	278948	279176	SPAC589.08c	SPAC3A12.10	dam1	rpl2001	-	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262631532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765436	2542489	2539908	278948	276454	SPAC589.08c	SPBC13E7.06	dam1	msd1	-	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.073230904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765437	2542489	2539686	278948	276241	SPAC589.08c	SPBC1734.06	dam1	rhp18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.928213759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765438	2542489	2539160	278948	275732	SPAC589.08c	SPCC18.17c	dam1	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.505514756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765439	2542489	2538762	278948	275345	SPAC589.08c	SPCC306.04c	dam1	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.017278921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765440	2542489	2543628	278948	280042	SPAC589.08c	SPAC3H8.10	dam1	spo20	-	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.404816132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765441	2542489	2542516	278948	278974	SPAC589.08c	SPAC2F7.04	dam1	pmc2	-	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575118784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765442	2542489	2541909	278948	278399	SPAC589.08c	SPAC227.01c	dam1	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05482847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765443	2542489	2540498	278948	277026	SPAC589.08c	SPBC27.02c	dam1	ask1	-	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.940531661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765444	2542489	2538966	278948	275540	SPAC589.08c	SPCC18.10	dam1	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.101539894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765445	2542489	2540998	278948	277514	SPAC589.08c	SPBC3D6.05	dam1	ptp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.98252502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765446	2542489	2540960	278948	277476	SPAC589.08c	SPBC3D6.02	dam1	but2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640658443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765447	2542489	2540089	278948	276627	SPAC589.08c	SPBC32H8.01c	dam1	SPBC32H8.01c	-	SPBP22H7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.904721395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765448	2542489	2541531	278948	278031	SPAC589.08c	SPAC25A8.01c	dam1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.976920224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765449	2542489	2542826	278948	279273	SPAC589.08c	SPAC13G6.09	dam1	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.75695834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765450	2542489	2539668	278948	276223	SPAC589.08c	SPBC11B10.10c	dam1	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.966620833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765451	2542489	2540516	278948	277044	SPAC589.08c	SPBC21C3.01c	dam1	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.12146496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765452	2542489	2542628	278948	279082	SPAC589.08c	SPAC24H6.06	dam1	sld3	-	mug175	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.879155494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765453	2542489	2540927	278948	277443	SPAC589.08c	SPBC365.06	dam1	pmt3	-	smt3|ubl2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.489409492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765454	2542489	2543633	278948	280047	SPAC589.08c	SPAC3H8.05c	dam1	mms1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.032502188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765455	2542489	2543046	278948	279481	SPAC589.08c	SPAC3C7.10	dam1	pex13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935954249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765456	2542489	2540432	278948	276960	SPAC589.08c	SPBC25H2.05	dam1	egd2	-	nac1|ucp15	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.119894589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765457	2542489	2539726	278948	276278	SPAC589.08c	SPBC13E7.08c	dam1	leo1	-	SPBC13E7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.834004045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765458	2542489	2542904	278948	279348	SPAC589.08c	SPAC144.11	dam1	rps1102	-	rps11|rps11-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.340452128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765459	2542489	2538840	278948	275421	SPAC589.08c	SPCC736.07c	dam1	SPCC736.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.625925657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765460	2542489	2539189	278948	275760	SPAC589.08c	SPCC1682.16	dam1	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.66934119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765461	2542489	2542021	278948	278504	SPAC589.08c	SPAP14E8.02	dam1	tos4	-	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.732595813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765462	2542489	2543384	278948	279806	SPAC589.08c	SPAC637.06	dam1	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.449202362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765463	2542489	2538920	278948	275497	SPAC589.08c	SPCC1840.05c	dam1	SPCC1840.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386591279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765464	2542489	2541478	278948	277980	SPAC589.08c	SPAC2F7.17	dam1	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.693361777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765465	2542489	2541272	278948	277786	SPAC589.08c	SPBC947.03c	dam1	naa38	-	mak31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.970262736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765466	2542489	2541297	278948	277809	SPAC589.08c	SPBC9B6.07	dam1	nop52	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322039477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765467	2542489	2542617	278948	279071	SPAC589.08c	SPAC13A11.01c	dam1	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.570286281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765468	2542489	2540649	278948	277174	SPAC589.08c	SPBC19F8.08	dam1	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.828159127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765469	2541709	2540913	278204	277429	SPAC3C7.02c	SPBC56F2.08c	pil2	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC3C7.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.398844877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765470	2541709	3361570	278204	280646	SPAC3C7.02c	SPAC750.01	pil2	SPAC750.01	SPAC3C7.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378913365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765471	2541709	2542677	278204	279130	SPAC3C7.02c	SPAC26F1.10c	pil2	pyp1	SPAC3C7.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.964616027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765472	2541709	2542641	278204	279095	SPAC3C7.02c	SPAC24C9.15c	pil2	spn5	SPAC3C7.02c	mde9|meu28	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329900118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765473	2541709	2542555	278204	279012	SPAC3C7.02c	SPAC1952.06c	pil2	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC3C7.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.216969711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765474	2541709	2543542	278204	279959	SPAC3C7.02c	SPAC823.09c	pil2	SPAC823.09c	SPAC3C7.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507022007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765475	2541709	2541812	278204	278303	SPAC3C7.02c	SPAC23G3.12c	pil2	SPAC23G3.12c	SPAC3C7.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038753722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765476	2541709	2542568	278204	279024	SPAC3C7.02c	SPAC1952.02	pil2	tma23	SPAC3C7.02c	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.840345095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765477	2541709	2542311	278204	278777	SPAC3C7.02c	SPAC16A10.05c	pil2	dad1	SPAC3C7.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.163859259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765478	2541709	2541741	278204	278235	SPAC3C7.02c	SPAC20G4.02c	pil2	fus1	SPAC3C7.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932082031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765479	2541709	2542522	278204	278980	SPAC3C7.02c	SPAC19A8.03	pil2	ymr1	SPAC3C7.02c	SPAC19A8.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382990226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765480	2541709	2540801	278204	277320	SPAC3C7.02c	SPBC18H10.10c	pil2	saf4	SPAC3C7.02c	cwc16|cwf16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.827990775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765481	2541709	2540086	278204	276624	SPAC3C7.02c	SPBC16H5.12c	pil2	SPBC16H5.12c	SPAC3C7.02c	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.323548446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765482	2541709	2543396	278204	279818	SPAC3C7.02c	SPAC4D7.11	pil2	dsc4	SPAC3C7.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.362318198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765483	2541709	2540665	278204	277190	SPAC3C7.02c	SPBC83.02c	pil2	rpl4302	SPAC3C7.02c	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446735457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765484	2541709	2541955	278204	278442	SPAC3C7.02c	SPAC5D6.04	pil2	SPAC5D6.04	SPAC3C7.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.118926724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765485	2541709	2541720	278204	278214	SPAC3C7.02c	SPAC23H3.13c	pil2	gpa2	SPAC3C7.02c	git8	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864208265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765486	2541709	2541241	278204	277755	SPAC3C7.02c	SPBC887.17	pil2	SPBC887.17	SPAC3C7.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.264621555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765487	2541709	2539538	278204	276100	SPAC3C7.02c	SPCC364.06	pil2	nap1	SPAC3C7.02c	nap11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.948350659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765488	2541709	2543525	278204	279943	SPAC3C7.02c	SPAC4A8.14	pil2	SPAC4A8.14	SPAC3C7.02c	prs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322120091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765489	2541709	2543387	278204	279809	SPAC3C7.02c	SPAPB1E7.02c	pil2	mcl1	SPAC3C7.02c	slr3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.759726066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765490	2541709	2541478	278204	277980	SPAC3C7.02c	SPAC2F7.17	pil2	mrf1	SPAC3C7.02c	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815838739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765491	2540606	2539201	277132	275772	SPBC428.03c	SPCC188.09c	pho4	pfl4	-	SPCC188.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809864759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765492	2540606	2541021	277132	277536	SPBC428.03c	SPBC3B8.10c	pho4	nem1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934429282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765493	2540606	2542597	277132	279051	SPBC428.03c	SPAP8A3.07c	pho4	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.080257845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765494	2540606	2543193	277132	279622	SPBC428.03c	SPAC3F10.11c	pho4	abc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097767694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765495	2540606	2541628	277132	278124	SPBC428.03c	SPAC110.02	pho4	pds5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811253559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765496	2540606	2541806	277132	278297	SPBC428.03c	SPAC4G8.13c	pho4	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.951841543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765497	2540606	2542566	277132	279022	SPBC428.03c	SPAC8C9.12c	pho4	SPAC8C9.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093711131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765498	2540606	2539001	277132	275575	SPBC428.03c	SPCC1494.08c	pho4	SPCC1494.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515541054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765499	2543387	2542207	279809	278682	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC17H9.10c	mcl1	ddb1	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.046446938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765500	2543387	2539050	279809	275623	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC11E10.08	mcl1	rik1	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.772659045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765501	2543387	2540556	279809	277083	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC19F8.04c	mcl1	lcl3	slr3	SPBC19F8.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148260142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765502	2543387	2542862	279809	279308	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC140.03	mcl1	arb1	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.634920988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765503	2543387	2540060	279809	276598	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC106.01	mcl1	mph1	slr3	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.355878772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765504	2543387	2540885	279809	277402	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC660.14	mcl1	mik1	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.968263334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765505	2543387	2539566	279809	276126	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC736.13	mcl1	SPCC736.13	slr3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982769961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765506	2543387	2539452	279809	276015	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC70.03c	mcl1	SPCC70.03c	slr3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145429281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765507	2543387	2541912	279809	278402	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC222.16c	mcl1	csn3	slr3	SPAC821.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.636747809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765508	2543387	2539749	279809	276301	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC16A3.13	mcl1	meu7	slr3	aah4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871826197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765509	2543387	2543414	279809	279836	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC630.10	mcl1	SPAC630.10	slr3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.763551903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765510	2543387	2542127	279809	278603	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC1952.12c	mcl1	csn71	slr3	csn7|csn7a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.225961219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765511	2543387	2541818	279809	278309	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC11G7.02	mcl1	pub1	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330700481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765512	2543387	2539582	279809	276141	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC594.07c	mcl1	bqt3	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637359283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765513	2543387	2538896	279809	275474	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC584.11c	mcl1	SPCC584.11c	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.123851204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765514	2543387	2541135	279809	277650	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC839.03c	mcl1	SPBC839.03c	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.684860552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765515	2543387	3361561	279809	280637	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC11E3.01c	mcl1	swr1	slr3	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.740861209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765516	2543387	2541853	279809	278344	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC2F3.11	mcl1	SPAC2F3.11	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.42869216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765517	2543387	2541633	279809	278129	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC664.01c	mcl1	swi6	slr3	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.037254809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765518	2543387	2540168	279809	276703	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC1683.06c	mcl1	SPBC1683.06c	slr3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.464323996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765519	2543387	2540686	279809	277211	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC21D10.10	mcl1	bdc1	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.92567072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765520	2543387	2542071	279809	278548	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC26H5.03	mcl1	pcf2	slr3	cac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699941295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765521	2543387	2540664	279809	277189	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC215.02	mcl1	bob1	slr3	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.548355719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765522	2543387	2541361	279809	277872	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBP8B7.10c	mcl1	utp16	slr3	SPBP8B7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.595166014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765523	2543387	2540999	279809	277515	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC4B4.04	mcl1	SPBC4B4.04	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634200179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765524	2543387	2539420	279809	275985	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC970.07c	mcl1	raf2	slr3	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.177103104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765525	2543387	2541200	279809	277714	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC8D2.03c	mcl1	hhf2	slr3	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.923029276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765526	2543387	2541013	279809	277528	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC3H7.13	mcl1	far10	slr3	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.983403691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765527	2543387	2541313	279809	277825	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBP26C9.02c	mcl1	car1	slr3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201263714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765528	2543387	2538775	279809	275357	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC23B6.05c	mcl1	ssb3	slr3	rpa3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.502955364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765529	2543387	2539564	279809	276125	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC550.12	mcl1	arp6	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.125288987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765530	2543387	2538801	279809	275382	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC285.13c	mcl1	nup60	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.662029095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765531	2543387	2542709	279809	279162	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC26F1.08c	mcl1	SPAC26F1.08c	slr3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099796414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765532	2543387	2539434	279809	275997	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC757.09c	mcl1	rnc1	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387019054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765533	2543387	2542555	279809	279012	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC1952.06c	mcl1	SPAC1952.06c	slr3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201602415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765534	2543387	2540313	279809	276843	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC337.04	mcl1	ppk27	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324222358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765535	2543387	2540929	279809	277445	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC354.03	mcl1	swd3	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.427376257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765536	2543387	2538825	279809	275406	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC757.12	mcl1	SPCC757.12	slr3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.07671105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765537	2543387	3361342	279809	280418	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC16D10.07c	mcl1	sir2	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.452874256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765538	2543387	2540425	279809	276953	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC27.06c	mcl1	mgr2	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317163214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765539	2543387	2542318	279809	278784	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC16C9.05	mcl1	cph1	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.975268068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765540	2543387	2542277	279809	278746	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC17A5.02c	mcl1	dbr1	slr3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.77181929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765541	2543387	2543685	279809	280099	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC3C7.03c	mcl1	rad55	slr3	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505156948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765542	2543387	2541643	279809	278139	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC14C4.13	mcl1	rad17	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.748942891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765543	2543387	2541580	279809	278077	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC1687.05	mcl1	pli1	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.447057394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765544	2543387	2543563	279809	279979	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC664.02c	mcl1	arp8	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781623915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765545	2543387	2538698	279809	275283	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC1442.02	mcl1	SPCC1442.02	slr3	SPCC1450.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506255751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765546	2543387	2543426	279809	279846	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC631.02	mcl1	bdf2	slr3	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.214467044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765547	2543387	2540023	279809	276567	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC11C11.10	mcl1	SPBC11C11.10	slr3	SPBC3B8.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.256318388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765548	2543387	2543078	279809	279511	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC31A2.15c	mcl1	dcc1	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.286701593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765549	2543387	2543319	279809	279743	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC6B12.09	mcl1	trm10	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.337036718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765550	2543387	2541663	279809	278159	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC22G7.08	mcl1	ppk8	slr3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.072080243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765551	2543387	2538906	279809	275483	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC1259.03	mcl1	rpa12	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.863667827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765552	2543387	2540825	279809	277343	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC428.08c	mcl1	clr4	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.248310047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765553	2543387	2542300	279809	278767	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC1687.22c	mcl1	puf3	slr3	SPAC222.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.505262106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765554	2543387	2541926	279809	278414	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC222.14c	mcl1	SPAC222.14c	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775045081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765555	2543387	2542558	279809	279014	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC1952.07	mcl1	rad1	slr3	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.731514112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765556	2543387	2542239	279809	278711	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC18G6.02c	mcl1	chp1	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.636603683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765557	2543387	2542036	279809	278518	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC23A1.19c	mcl1	hrq1	slr3	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.328875444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765558	2543387	2539467	279809	276030	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC417.07c	mcl1	mto1	slr3	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380595035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765559	2543387	2539388	279809	275953	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC24B10.12	mcl1	cgi121	slr3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.030557082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765560	2543387	2539870	279809	276416	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC1709.18	mcl1	tif452	slr3	SPBC409.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.892261659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765561	2543387	2541800	279809	278291	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC732.02c	mcl1	SPAC732.02c	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.521807006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765562	2543387	2542463	279809	278924	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC1834.03c	mcl1	hhf1	slr3	h4.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.12523053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765563	2543387	2542507	279809	278965	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC18G6.13	mcl1	SPAC18G6.13	slr3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046522634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765564	2543387	2540352	279809	276881	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC215.03c	mcl1	csn1	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.80549752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765565	2543387	2540396	279809	276924	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC31F10.12	mcl1	tma20	slr3	SPBC31F10.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.822816331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765566	2543387	2541496	279809	277998	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC23D3.09	mcl1	arp42	slr3	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.070531419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765567	2543387	2541929	279809	278417	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC23C4.12	mcl1	hhp2	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.558082202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765568	2543387	2543246	279809	279674	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAPB8E5.05	mcl1	mfm1	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.129389139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765569	2543387	2538994	279809	275568	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC553.01c	mcl1	dbl2	slr3	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.980170403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765570	2543387	2540231	279809	276763	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC336.14c	mcl1	ppk26	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.629529008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765571	2543387	3361269	279809	280345	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC31A8.01c	mcl1	rtn1	slr3	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.841784544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765572	2543387	2542126	279809	278602	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC1B3.05	mcl1	not3	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.617587508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765573	2543387	2539000	279809	275574	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC1450.06c	mcl1	grx3	slr3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864198554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765574	2543387	2543244	279809	279672	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC6B12.06c	mcl1	rrg9	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.709526188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765575	2543387	2540751	279809	277273	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC20F10.10	mcl1	psl1	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.479374325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765576	2543387	2542976	279809	279414	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC9E9.09c	mcl1	atd1	slr3	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.937526134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765577	2543387	2539482	279809	276045	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC417.06c	mcl1	mug27	slr3	ppk35|slk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.853060512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765578	2543387	2540836	279809	277354	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC18H10.19	mcl1	vps38	slr3	atg14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.514499315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765579	2543387	2540077	279809	276615	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC17D11.04c	mcl1	nto1	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.423654261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765580	2543387	2539232	279809	275802	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC1223.04c	mcl1	set11	slr3	mug76	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.129948586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765581	2543387	2539408	279809	275973	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC576.12c	mcl1	mhf2	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.68512164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765582	2543387	2543443	279809	279863	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC3H1.12c	mcl1	snt2	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.37457893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765583	2543387	2540533	279809	277061	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC29A10.16c	mcl1	SPBC29A10.16c	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.846525042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765584	2543387	2538690	279809	275275	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC1393.05	mcl1	ers1	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.363128451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765585	2543387	2542255	279809	278725	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC57A7.08	mcl1	pzh1	slr3	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.783239215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765586	2543387	2541746	279809	278240	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC20G4.04c	mcl1	hus1	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320906766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765587	2543387	2541337	279809	277848	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBP35G2.13c	mcl1	swc2	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.523315196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765588	2543387	2541378	279809	277889	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBP8B7.21	mcl1	ubp3	slr3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.506409755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765589	2543387	2539527	279809	276089	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC338.16	mcl1	pof3	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.439581861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765590	2543387	2540930	279809	277446	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC354.10	mcl1	def1	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571818019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765591	2543387	2540589	279809	277115	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC20F10.06	mcl1	mad2	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.933416272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765592	2543387	2540691	279809	277216	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC20F10.05	mcl1	nrl1	slr3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044748137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765593	2543387	2538848	279809	275429	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC613.12c	mcl1	raf1	slr3	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.211477569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765594	2543387	2542198	279809	278673	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC6F12.09	mcl1	rdp1	slr3	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.054215862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765595	2543387	2543619	279809	280033	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC4F10.04	mcl1	ypa1	slr3	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.975320225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765596	2543387	2539555	279809	276116	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC4B3.08	mcl1	lsg1	slr3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092281094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765597	2543387	2540498	279809	277026	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC27.02c	mcl1	ask1	slr3	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.141210367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765598	2543387	2538717	279809	275301	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC1235.02	mcl1	bio2	slr3	SPCC320.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331174731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765599	2543387	2541531	279809	278031	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC25A8.01c	mcl1	fft3	slr3	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.613766623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765600	2543387	2541114	279809	277629	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC582.09	mcl1	pex11	slr3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.407040131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765601	2543387	2540523	279809	277051	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC29A10.10c	mcl1	dbl8	slr3	SPBC29A10.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.556722772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765602	2543387	2539668	279809	276223	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC11B10.10c	mcl1	pht1	slr3	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.756496417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765603	2543387	2541404	279809	277913	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBPB2B2.18	mcl1	SPBPB2B2.18	slr3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922824216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765604	2543387	2540182	279809	276715	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC16G5.06	mcl1	SPBC16G5.06	slr3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048008534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765605	2543387	2543633	279809	280047	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC3H8.05c	mcl1	mms1	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.640170941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765606	2543387	2539460	279809	276023	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC4B3.13	mcl1	SPCC4B3.13	slr3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.337878067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765607	2543387	2539375	279809	275941	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC4G3.11	mcl1	mug154	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633828314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765608	2543387	2541941	279809	278428	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC20H4.03c	mcl1	tfs1	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.167478798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765609	2543387	2542244	279809	278714	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC19G12.13c	mcl1	poz1	slr3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.059196894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765610	2543387	2542021	279809	278504	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAP14E8.02	mcl1	tos4	slr3	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.902844441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765611	2543387	3361410	279809	280486	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC1527.01	mcl1	mok11	slr3	SPAC23D3.15	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444695744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765612	2543387	2539700	279809	276253	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC1685.15c	mcl1	klp6	slr3	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.900879436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765613	2543387	2541709	279809	278204	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC3C7.02c	mcl1	pil2	slr3	SPAC3C7.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.759726066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765614	2543387	2543327	279809	279750	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC1D4.06c	mcl1	csk1	slr3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.563423167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765615	2543387	2540122	279809	276659	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC1778.03c	mcl1	SPBC1778.03c	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.743762952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765616	2543387	2539531	279809	276093	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC576.02	mcl1	SPCC576.02	slr3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.155132699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765617	2543387	2539583	279809	276142	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC777.04	mcl1	SPCC777.04	slr3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87016329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765618	2543387	2543372	279809	279794	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAPB1A10.09	mcl1	ase1	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.142302918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765619	2543387	2542943	279809	279384	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC1348.03	mcl1	SPBC1348.03	slr3	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.257523887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765620	2543387	2541529	279809	278029	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC1687.13c	mcl1	csn5	slr3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.972506993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765621	2543387	2540736	279809	277259	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC19F8.02	mcl1	SPBC19F8.02	slr3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982638983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765622	2538728	2541801	275312	278292	SPCC63.11	SPAC2F7.08c	prp28	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.03780294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765623	2538728	2540318	275312	276848	SPCC63.11	SPBC30B4.04c	prp28	sol1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.860454414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765624	2540845	2542597	277362	279051	SPBC428.13c	SPAP8A3.07c	mob1	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.505412302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765625	2540845	2539207	277362	275777	SPBC428.13c	SPCC285.09c	mob1	cgs2	-	pde1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.346023954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765626	2540845	2539001	277362	275575	SPBC428.13c	SPCC1494.08c	mob1	SPCC1494.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51817804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765627	2541480	2541160	277982	277675	SPAC23D3.10c	SPBC725.09c	eng2	hob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.627652798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765628	2541480	2540533	277982	277061	SPAC23D3.10c	SPBC29A10.16c	eng2	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.292820141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765629	2541480	3361389	277982	280465	SPAC23D3.10c	SPAC977.13c	eng2	SPAC977.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.777326465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765630	2538913	2542207	275490	278682	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC17H9.10c	ccr4	ddb1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.83170787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765631	2538913	2542895	275490	279339	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC13G6.10c	ccr4	asl1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.752953984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765632	2538913	2538721	275490	275305	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC1494.10	ccr4	adn3	SPCC5E4.02c	SPCC70.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319183171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765633	2538913	2541204	275490	277718	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC839.06	ccr4	cta3	SPCC5E4.02c	SPBC24E9.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815549997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765634	2538913	2540060	275490	276598	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC106.01	ccr4	mph1	SPCC5E4.02c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.72011857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765635	2538913	2540942	275490	277458	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC3H7.14	ccr4	mug176	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.670557935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765636	2538913	3361210	275490	280286	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC16E9.16c	ccr4	lsd90	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811834925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765637	2538913	2538961	275490	275535	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC285.14	ccr4	trs130	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576734765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765638	2538913	2540105	275490	276642	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC106.04	ccr4	ada1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.145742893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765639	2538913	2543529	275490	279947	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC4C5.02c	ccr4	ryh1	SPCC5E4.02c	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.935529187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765640	2538913	2543617	275490	280031	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC4A8.10	ccr4	SPAC4A8.10	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.070406014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765641	2538913	2542585	275490	279040	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC31A2.13c	ccr4	sft1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.331866746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765642	2538913	2542518	275490	278976	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1B3.16c	ccr4	vht1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.510234872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765643	2538913	2542390	275490	278854	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC6F6.11c	ccr4	SPAC6F6.11c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.987705924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765644	2538913	2543634	275490	280048	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC3H8.04	ccr4	SPAC3H8.04	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.460912915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765645	2538913	2541512	275490	278013	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC11E3.08c	ccr4	nse6	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.262108609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765646	2538913	2540913	275490	277429	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC56F2.08c	ccr4	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.703162669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765647	2538913	2542372	275490	278836	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1F3.03	ccr4	SPAC1F3.03	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.191316768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765648	2538913	2539452	275490	276015	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC70.03c	ccr4	SPCC70.03c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.446552478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765649	2538913	2541913	275490	278403	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC227.04	ccr4	atg10	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC227.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.344217941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765650	2538913	2541570	275490	278067	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC6G9.09c	ccr4	rpl2401	SPCC5E4.02c	rpl24|rpl24-01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771066228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765651	2538913	2540026	275490	276570	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC16D10.08c	ccr4	hsp104	SPCC5E4.02c	SPBC16D10.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.666062935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765652	2538913	2539749	275490	276301	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC16A3.13	ccr4	meu7	SPCC5E4.02c	aah4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.100803193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765653	2538913	2541513	275490	278014	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC227.13c	ccr4	isu1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.174466626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765654	2538913	2540956	275490	277472	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC409.06	ccr4	uch2	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.77451444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765655	2538913	2542706	275490	279159	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC29B12.13	ccr4	SPAC29B12.13	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.919097159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765656	2538913	2541818	275490	278309	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC11G7.02	ccr4	pub1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.374635665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765657	2538913	2542671	275490	279124	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC824.09c	ccr4	SPAC824.09c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321823228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765658	2538913	2539965	275490	276509	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC1685.14c	ccr4	SPBC1685.14c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.04447221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765659	2538913	2542787	275490	279236	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC9G1.08c	ccr4	SPAC9G1.08c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581532439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765660	2538913	2543575	275490	279990	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC644.13c	ccr4	SPAC644.13c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.721229214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765661	2538913	2542293	275490	278761	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC17G8.14c	ccr4	pck1	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC22H10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.490949318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765662	2538913	2542378	275490	278842	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1805.04	ccr4	nup132	SPCC5E4.02c	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.622050356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765663	2538913	2540745	275490	277268	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC21C3.18	ccr4	spo4	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928898725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765664	2538913	2538993	275490	275567	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC162.12	ccr4	tco89	SPCC5E4.02c	SPCC1753.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.47193474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765665	2538913	2542237	275490	278709	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC19E9.02	ccr4	fin1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.334417851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765666	2538913	3361119	275490	280195	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC663.07c	ccr4	SPCC663.07c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.87271163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765667	2538913	3361561	275490	280637	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC11E3.01c	ccr4	swr1	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.98850041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765668	2538913	2538857	275490	275437	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC1442.05c	ccr4	SPCC1442.05c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.176329178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765669	2538913	2539939	275490	276483	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC11G11.01	ccr4	fis1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980271826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765670	2538913	2539068	275490	275640	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC1442.11c	ccr4	SPCC1442.11c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.852091176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765671	2538913	2542650	275490	279104	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC2C4.10c	ccr4	csc4	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC2C4.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.119502875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765672	2538913	2541853	275490	278344	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC2F3.11	ccr4	SPAC2F3.11	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391979685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765673	2538913	2540410	275490	276938	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC2D10.04	ccr4	SPBC2D10.04	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.405861122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765674	2538913	2540296	275490	276827	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC2D10.05	ccr4	exg3	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.771805928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765675	2538913	2541117	275490	277632	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC646.13	ccr4	sds23	SPCC5E4.02c	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.259308884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765676	2538913	2540161	275490	276696	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC13E7.03c	ccr4	SPBC13E7.03c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.666696634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765677	2538913	2543201	275490	279630	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC3F10.15c	ccr4	spo12	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.176934096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765678	2538913	2543594	275490	280009	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC8F11.05c	ccr4	mug130	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.263294416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765679	2538913	2541633	275490	278129	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC664.01c	ccr4	swi6	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440683885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765680	2538913	2539734	275490	276286	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC1604.16c	ccr4	SPBC1604.16c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.64382868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765681	2538913	2541497	275490	277999	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC7D4.13c	ccr4	SPAC7D4.13c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045288342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765682	2538913	2543652	275490	280066	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC4H3.03c	ccr4	SPAC4H3.03c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.459085826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765683	2538913	2540694	275490	277218	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC19C7.10	ccr4	bqt4	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.006517726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765684	2538913	2541066	275490	277581	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC543.02c	ccr4	SPBC543.02c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575368241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765685	2538913	5802945	275490	858083	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC19G12.16c	ccr4	adg2	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC23A1.01c|mug46	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.131237192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765686	2538913	2542614	275490	279068	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1399.04c	ccr4	SPAC1399.04c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.843405715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765687	2538913	2542701	275490	279154	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC26H5.05	ccr4	mga2	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.67968942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765688	2538913	2542103	275490	278579	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC31G5.11	ccr4	pac2	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517495174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765689	2538913	2541098	275490	277613	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC577.13	ccr4	syj2	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38316241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765690	2538913	2540491	275490	277019	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC28E12.04	ccr4	SPBC28E12.04	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.074937495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765691	2538913	2540455	275490	276983	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC215.05	ccr4	gpd1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.333893024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765692	2538913	3361436	275490	280512	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1296.01c	ccr4	SPAC1296.01c	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC22F3.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.339515245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765693	2538913	2543320	275490	279744	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAPJ695.01c	ccr4	SPAPJ695.01c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.40546524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765694	2538913	2541361	275490	277872	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBP8B7.10c	ccr4	utp16	SPCC5E4.02c	SPBP8B7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.50448184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765695	2538913	2539332	275490	275898	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCPB1C11.01	ccr4	amt1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.413874742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765696	2538913	3361570	275490	280646	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC750.01	ccr4	SPAC750.01	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.918435635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765697	2538913	2540975	275490	277491	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC354.12	ccr4	gpd3	SPCC5E4.02c	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.611985874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765698	2538913	2541200	275490	277714	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC8D2.03c	ccr4	hhf2	SPCC5E4.02c	ams3|h4.2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.978818359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765699	2538913	2542468	275490	278929	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1D4.09c	ccr4	rtf2	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445015019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765700	2538913	2541208	275490	277722	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC887.04c	ccr4	lub1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.745404321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765701	2538913	2542179	275490	278654	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC17C9.12	ccr4	scs22	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC17C9.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877584799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765702	2538913	2541013	275490	277528	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC3H7.13	ccr4	far10	SPCC5E4.02c	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.811328733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765703	2538913	2539970	275490	276514	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC1773.01	ccr4	far8	SPCC5E4.02c	SPBC1773.01|csc3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.532631917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765704	2538913	2542273	275490	278742	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC17H9.13c	ccr4	SPAC17H9.13c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.56331678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765705	2538913	2541092	275490	277607	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC660.12c	ccr4	egt2	SPCC5E4.02c	SPBC660.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.132275647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765706	2538913	2541500	275490	278002	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC227.18	ccr4	lys3	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC2F7.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.927146046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765707	2538913	2539913	275490	276457	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC11G11.03	ccr4	mrt4	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.049370636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765708	2538913	2541682	275490	278178	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC15F9.02	ccr4	seh1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.38818276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765709	2538913	2543518	275490	279936	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC4F8.11	ccr4	SPAC4F8.11	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814041176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765710	2538913	2543260	275490	279688	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1002.17c	ccr4	urg2	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.640951078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765711	2538913	2542696	275490	279149	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC29B12.03	ccr4	spd1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.62946418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765712	2538913	2542724	275490	279175	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC767.01c	ccr4	vps1	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC9G1.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.383012308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765713	2538913	2540945	275490	277461	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC342.06c	ccr4	rtt109	SPCC5E4.02c	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.307340038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765714	2538913	2540306	275490	276836	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC2G5.02c	ccr4	ckb2	SPCC5E4.02c	SPBC2G5.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.457544492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765715	2538913	2542848	275490	279294	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC9G1.03c	ccr4	rpl3001	SPCC5E4.02c	rpl30|rpl30-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.949230967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765716	2538913	2543453	275490	279873	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC3G9.03	ccr4	rpl2301	SPCC5E4.02c	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.941461075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765717	2538913	2540692	275490	277217	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC800.07c	ccr4	tsf1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.024377012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765718	2538913	2541026	275490	277541	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC337.09	ccr4	erg28	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.168972248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765719	2538913	2540220	275490	276753	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC337.03	ccr4	rhn1	SPCC5E4.02c	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.347884385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765720	2538913	2543053	275490	279487	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC10F6.15	ccr4	SPAC10F6.15	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.507837505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765721	2538913	3361381	275490	280457	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC12G12.01c	ccr4	SPAC12G12.01c	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC630.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.454090754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765722	2538913	2540698	275490	277222	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC215.11c	ccr4	SPBC215.11c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986270466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765723	2538913	3361385	275490	280461	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1639.02c	ccr4	trk2	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC1F5.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814232737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765724	2538913	2543636	275490	280050	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC3H8.08c	ccr4	SPAC3H8.08c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.151216131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765725	2538913	2543547	275490	279964	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC926.02	ccr4	SPAC926.02	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640814151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765726	2538913	2539988	275490	276532	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC1271.05c	ccr4	SPBC1271.05c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.918407882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765727	2538913	2541530	275490	278030	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC57A10.10c	ccr4	sla1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645889008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765728	2538913	2539063	275490	275635	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC126.12	ccr4	SPCC126.12	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872543456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765729	2538913	2540727	275490	277250	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC1921.03c	ccr4	mex67	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.935869461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765730	2538913	2542022	275490	278505	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC23A1.03	ccr4	apt1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.783651462	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765731	2538913	2541323	275490	277835	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBP35G2.14	ccr4	SPBP35G2.14	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.155575218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765732	2538913	2542318	275490	278784	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC16C9.05	ccr4	cph1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.108282357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765733	2538913	2542969	275490	279409	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC4G8.10	ccr4	gos1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377520895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765734	2538913	2542277	275490	278746	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC17A5.02c	ccr4	dbr1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.409862595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765735	2538913	2543609	275490	280023	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC630.05	ccr4	gyp7	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.978746032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765736	2538913	2541707	275490	278202	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC29E6.01	ccr4	pof11	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC30.05|mug156	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873470113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765737	2538913	2540364	275490	276893	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC29B5.02c	ccr4	isp4	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.921030565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765738	2538913	2543308	275490	279732	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC694.04c	ccr4	SPAC694.04c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.686481287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765739	2538913	2540851	275490	277368	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC4F6.04	ccr4	rpl2502	SPCC5E4.02c	rpl23a-2|rpl25b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.280136145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765740	2538913	2540595	275490	277121	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC21C3.02c	ccr4	dep1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.567391732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765741	2538913	2543296	275490	279721	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC9E9.03	ccr4	leu2	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.917359426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765742	2538913	2539981	275490	276525	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC1289.09	ccr4	tim21	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.770759013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765743	2538913	2542246	275490	278716	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC17H9.12c	ccr4	SPAC17H9.12c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873062662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765744	2538913	2540540	275490	277067	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC23E6.10c	ccr4	SPBC23E6.10c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455857197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765745	2538913	2543641	275490	280055	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC3H5.08c	ccr4	SPAC3H5.08c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990769003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765746	2538913	2541295	275490	277807	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC947.09	ccr4	hsp3103	SPCC5E4.02c	SPBC947.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.668869612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765747	2538913	2543563	275490	279979	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC664.02c	ccr4	arp8	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.193420589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765748	2538913	2542082	275490	278559	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC29B12.10c	ccr4	pgt1	SPCC5E4.02c	opt1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.331114745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765749	2538913	2543584	275490	279999	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAPB1E7.11c	ccr4	SPAPB1E7.11c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.25861022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765750	2538913	2541014	275490	277529	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC3D6.06c	ccr4	prs5	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.102102238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765751	2538913	2543426	275490	279846	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC631.02	ccr4	bdf2	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.085589383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765752	2538913	2542530	275490	278988	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1399.02	ccr4	SPAC1399.02	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.234650078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765753	2538913	2542640	275490	279094	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC9E9.12c	ccr4	ybt1	SPCC5E4.02c	abc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093593655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765754	2538913	2540415	275490	276943	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC30B4.06c	ccr4	SPBC30B4.06c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.665467782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765755	2538913	2539980	275490	276524	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC1773.14	ccr4	arg7	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874897639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765756	2538913	2538972	275490	275546	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC1739.15	ccr4	wtf21	SPCC5E4.02c	wtf3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097023739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765757	2538913	2539381	275490	275947	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC1739.10	ccr4	mug33	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.335330235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765758	2538913	2541301	275490	277813	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBP23A10.05	ccr4	ssr4	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.27466968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765759	2538913	3361456	275490	280532	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1142.03c	ccr4	swi2	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC17G6.20c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.33062121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765760	2538913	2543615	275490	280029	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC4F8.08	ccr4	mug114	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.173870959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765761	2538913	3361543	275490	280619	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC9.13c	ccr4	cwf16	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAPJ735.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.566992347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765762	2538913	2541926	275490	278414	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC222.14c	ccr4	SPAC222.14c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.61914533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765763	2538913	2541021	275490	277536	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC3B8.10c	ccr4	nem1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.479396116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765764	2538913	2540893	275490	277409	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC543.10	ccr4	get1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258407526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765765	2538913	2539310	275490	275877	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC285.17	ccr4	spp27	SPCC5E4.02c	uaf30	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.274671786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765766	2538913	2542153	275490	278629	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1952.10c	ccr4	SPAC1952.10c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444110909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765767	2538913	2542331	275490	278797	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1834.05	ccr4	alg9	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932651415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765768	2538913	2542239	275490	278711	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC18G6.02c	ccr4	chp1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.334011493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765769	2538913	2541379	275490	277890	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBP8B7.27	ccr4	mug30	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090439237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765770	2538913	2542268	275490	278737	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC17A5.07c	ccr4	ulp2	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.989220516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765771	2538913	2539467	275490	276030	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC417.07c	ccr4	mto1	SPCC5E4.02c	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.573898232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765772	2538913	2542311	275490	278777	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC16A10.05c	ccr4	dad1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.560923071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765773	2538913	2539339	275490	275905	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC1494.03	ccr4	arz1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200891484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765774	2538913	2543537	275490	279954	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC4D7.05	ccr4	sum1	SPCC5E4.02c	tif34	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642434411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765775	2538913	2541885	275490	278375	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC22H10.03c	ccr4	kap114	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.77303992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765776	2538913	2539705	275490	276258	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC1105.10	ccr4	rav1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.620407799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765777	2538913	2542950	275490	279390	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC12B10.03	ccr4	bun62	SPCC5E4.02c	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.566711317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765778	2538913	2542695	275490	279148	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC12B10.09	ccr4	pet801	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC12B10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.460211375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765779	2538913	2539870	275490	276416	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC1709.18	ccr4	tif452	SPCC5E4.02c	SPBC409.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.20320438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765780	2538913	2540631	275490	277157	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC25B2.10	ccr4	SPBC25B2.10	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.194507345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765781	2538913	2542964	275490	279404	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC12G12.07c	ccr4	SPAC12G12.07c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844141278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765782	2538913	2541237	275490	277751	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC947.04	ccr4	pfl3	SPCC5E4.02c	SPBC947.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.565854147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765783	2538913	2541250	275490	277764	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC8D2.17	ccr4	gmh4	SPCC5E4.02c	SPBC8D2.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.124421446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765784	2538913	2540892	275490	277408	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC530.01	ccr4	gyp1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.87027952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765785	2538913	2541800	275490	278291	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC732.02c	ccr4	SPAC732.02c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443719862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765786	2538913	2541264	275490	277778	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC902.06	ccr4	mto2	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.749886281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765787	2538913	2540192	275490	276725	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC1215.01	ccr4	shy1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.918140114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765788	2538913	2543144	275490	279576	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC3F10.05c	ccr4	mug113	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.212973421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765789	2538913	2540401	275490	276929	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC2A9.02	ccr4	SPBC2A9.02	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.10168889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765790	2538913	2543445	275490	279865	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC4F10.13c	ccr4	mpd2	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51814338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765791	2538913	2538770	275490	275353	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC1753.02c	ccr4	git3	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.12336774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765792	2538913	2543483	275490	279903	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAPB2B4.02	ccr4	grx5	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990862835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765793	2538913	2540348	275490	276877	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC29A10.05	ccr4	exo1	SPCC5E4.02c	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.130692701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765794	2538913	3361491	275490	280567	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1805.08	ccr4	dlc1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714556881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765795	2538913	2539990	275490	276534	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC1289.14	ccr4	SPBC1289.14	SPCC5E4.02c	SPBC8E4.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043726507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765796	2538913	2542507	275490	278965	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC18G6.13	ccr4	SPAC18G6.13	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637814804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765797	2538913	2540352	275490	276881	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC215.03c	ccr4	csn1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.76857861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765798	2538913	2543412	275490	279834	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC637.07	ccr4	moe1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.180545283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765799	2538913	2539754	275490	276306	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC16C6.04	ccr4	dbl6	SPCC5E4.02c	SPBC16C6.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.973785909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765800	2538913	2539733	275490	276285	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC16E9.12c	ccr4	pab2	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049168861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765801	2538913	2540396	275490	276924	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC31F10.12	ccr4	tma20	SPCC5E4.02c	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381851061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765802	2538913	2540673	275490	277198	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC1D7.03	ccr4	mug80	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.237040969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765803	2538913	2540150	275490	276687	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC16E9.14c	ccr4	zrg17	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.561140499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765804	2538913	2541735	275490	278229	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC7D4.04	ccr4	atg11	SPCC5E4.02c	taf1|cvt9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.454115937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765805	2538913	2542464	275490	278925	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1A6.09c	ccr4	lag1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.753111414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765806	2538913	2542420	275490	278883	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC19D5.03	ccr4	cid1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.433793059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765807	2538913	2542494	275490	278953	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC19D5.07	ccr4	uga1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.925656622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765808	2538913	2540886	275490	277403	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC4F6.10	ccr4	vps901	SPCC5E4.02c	vps9a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.772279789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765809	2538913	2541876	275490	278366	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAP27G11.11c	ccr4	SPAP27G11.11c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.310936463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765810	2538913	2542921	275490	279362	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1093.01	ccr4	ppr5	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC12B10.18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19665795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765811	2538913	2542469	275490	278930	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC19A8.04	ccr4	erg5	SPCC5E4.02c	cyp61	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.612278151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765812	2538913	2542521	275490	278979	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC18G6.12c	ccr4	SPAC18G6.12c	SPCC5E4.02c	B22918-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810019771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765813	2538913	2543667	275490	280081	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC4H3.02c	ccr4	swc3	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.186111542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765814	2538913	2539689	275490	276244	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC1861.03	ccr4	mak10	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.063922021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765815	2538913	2539168	275490	275739	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC1620.08	ccr4	SPCC1620.08	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.563559878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765816	2538913	2541413	275490	277921	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBPJ4664.06	ccr4	gpt1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145517325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765817	2538913	2542357	275490	278822	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1782.07	ccr4	qcr8	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147501807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765818	2538913	2543101	275490	279533	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC323.03c	ccr4	SPAC323.03c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.620768592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765819	2538913	2540801	275490	277320	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC18H10.10c	ccr4	saf4	SPCC5E4.02c	cwc16|cwf16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.771091024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765820	2538913	2539586	275490	276145	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC70.08c	ccr4	SPCC70.08c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711635787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765821	2538913	2540086	275490	276624	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC16H5.12c	ccr4	SPBC16H5.12c	SPCC5E4.02c	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.966786978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765822	2538913	2542902	275490	279346	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC144.05	ccr4	SPAC144.05	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6708514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765823	2538913	2541739	275490	278233	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC2G11.10c	ccr4	SPAC2G11.10c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195453828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765824	2538913	2540231	275490	276763	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC336.14c	ccr4	ppk26	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.985748985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765825	2538913	2543406	275490	279828	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC9.12c	ccr4	atp12	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.946180375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765826	2538913	2539667	275490	276222	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC13G1.08c	ccr4	ash2	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.5664713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765827	2538913	2542861	275490	279307	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC13G7.13c	ccr4	msa1	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC6C3.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.874140923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765828	2538913	2542126	275490	278602	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1B3.05	ccr4	not3	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.254013488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765829	2538913	2542528	275490	278986	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1B3.08	ccr4	SPAC1B3.08	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.70176144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765830	2538913	2540628	275490	277154	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC25B2.08	ccr4	SPBC25B2.08	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.640230008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765831	2538913	2542007	275490	278490	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC20H4.07	ccr4	rad57	SPCC5E4.02c	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.075279354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765832	2538913	2542710	275490	279163	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC750.08c	ccr4	SPAC750.08c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819654353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765833	2538913	2543244	275490	279672	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC6B12.06c	ccr4	rrg9	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.91587123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765834	2538913	2541955	275490	278442	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC5D6.04	ccr4	SPAC5D6.04	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.144375777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765835	2538913	2540751	275490	277273	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC20F10.10	ccr4	psl1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.063549525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765836	2538913	2542976	275490	279414	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC9E9.09c	ccr4	atd1	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC9E9.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990029612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765837	2538913	2542419	275490	278882	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC17G6.05c	ccr4	bro1	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC17G6.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.610377053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765838	2538913	2541451	275490	277956	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC23G3.02c	ccr4	sib1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.507051677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765839	2538913	3361569	275490	280645	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC186.04c	ccr4	SPAC186.04c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984232079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765840	2538913	2539974	275490	276518	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC32H8.07	ccr4	git5	SPCC5E4.02c	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.768869736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765841	2538913	2540427	275490	276955	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC2A9.13	ccr4	SPBC2A9.13	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199994843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765842	2538913	2541720	275490	278214	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC23H3.13c	ccr4	gpa2	SPCC5E4.02c	git8	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.765679653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765843	2538913	2543392	275490	279814	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC8F11.03	ccr4	msh3	SPCC5E4.02c	swi4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.458314902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765844	2538913	2542575	275490	279031	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC31G5.10	ccr4	eta2	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318742238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765845	2538913	2540394	275490	276922	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC2D10.09	ccr4	snr1	SPCC5E4.02c	SPBC2D10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928663138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765846	2538913	2540836	275490	277354	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC18H10.19	ccr4	vps38	SPCC5E4.02c	atg14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.962561987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765847	2538913	2540077	275490	276615	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC17D11.04c	ccr4	nto1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.715918577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765848	2538913	2540232	275490	276764	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC336.10c	ccr4	tif512	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.97523062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765849	2538913	2543357	275490	279779	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC688.12c	ccr4	SPAC688.12c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.466185006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765850	2538913	2539232	275490	275802	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC1223.04c	ccr4	set11	SPCC5E4.02c	mug76	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.316339851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765851	2538913	2542431	275490	278893	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1A6.01c	ccr4	SPAC1A6.01c	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC23C4.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574122861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765852	2538913	2543234	275490	279662	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC977.11	ccr4	SPAC977.11	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.26203103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765853	2538913	2543301	275490	279726	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC977.17	ccr4	SPAC977.17	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931521197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765854	2538913	2539408	275490	275973	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC576.12c	ccr4	mhf2	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.129832497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765855	2538913	2541009	275490	277524	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC428.04	ccr4	apq12	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.278273572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765856	2538913	2539215	275490	275785	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC285.16c	ccr4	msh6	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978993664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765857	2538913	2540094	275490	276632	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC146.10	ccr4	mug57	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.611548172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765858	2538913	2542813	275490	279260	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC29B12.11c	ccr4	SPAC29B12.11c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.20340112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765859	2538913	2542056	275490	278535	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC6G9.14	ccr4	SPAC6G9.14	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.503681362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765860	2538913	2542439	275490	278901	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC17A5.08	ccr4	erp2	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.281841407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765861	2538913	2538824	275490	275405	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC1442.14c	ccr4	hnt1	SPCC5E4.02c	SPCC1442.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.774144903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765862	2538913	2540990	275490	277506	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC36B7.06c	ccr4	mug20	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.997634133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765863	2538913	2540378	275490	276907	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC30D10.18c	ccr4	rpl102	SPCC5E4.02c	rpl1-2|rpl10a-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445171296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765864	2538913	2541389	275490	277900	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBPB2B2.09c	ccr4	SPBPB2B2.09c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.224112899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765865	2538913	2539936	275490	276480	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC1685.05	ccr4	SPBC1685.05	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.821251439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765866	2538913	2539740	275490	276292	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC1685.04	ccr4	SPBC1685.04	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.866593579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765867	2538913	2540019	275490	276563	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC1685.01	ccr4	pmp1	SPCC5E4.02c	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258836464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765868	2538913	2542618	275490	279072	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1952.15c	ccr4	rec24	SPCC5E4.02c	mug6	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.76542422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765869	2538913	2541112	275490	277627	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC725.07	ccr4	pex5	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143837655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765870	2538913	2541536	275490	278036	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1071.02	ccr4	mms19	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.360969958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765871	2538913	2541708	275490	278203	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC31A2.02	ccr4	trm112	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.208970433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765872	2538913	2543224	275490	279652	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAPB8E5.10	ccr4	SPAPB8E5.10	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.185531952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765873	2538913	2540342	275490	276871	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC2G2.01c	ccr4	liz1	SPCC5E4.02c	SPBC4B4.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195536112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765874	2538913	2542597	275490	279051	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAP8A3.07c	ccr4	SPAP8A3.07c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.535695309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765875	2538913	2539847	275490	276395	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC530.14c	ccr4	dsk1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.54070241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765876	2538913	2541395	275490	277904	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBP8B7.25	ccr4	cyp4	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.868468466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765877	2538913	2542773	275490	279222	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC16.01	ccr4	rho2	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.682371562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765878	2538913	2539052	275490	275625	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC663.09c	ccr4	SPCC663.09c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510919787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765879	2538913	2540850	275490	277367	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC18A7.02c	ccr4	SPBC18A7.02c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.433872207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765880	2538913	2539427	275490	275992	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC663.15c	ccr4	SPCC663.15c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388501987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765881	2538913	2539059	275490	275632	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC737.06c	ccr4	SPCC737.06c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.67951548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765882	2538913	2540533	275490	277061	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC29A10.16c	ccr4	SPBC29A10.16c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.067534029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765883	2538913	2539711	275490	276264	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC1683.09c	ccr4	frp1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.285922678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765884	2538913	2540687	275490	277212	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC21D10.08c	ccr4	SPBC21D10.08c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.536158892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765885	2538913	2541680	275490	278176	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC22F8.09	ccr4	rrp16	SPCC5E4.02c	nop53	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510686513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765886	2538913	2542060	275490	278538	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC23C11.14	ccr4	zhf1	SPCC5E4.02c	zhf	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.921127701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765887	2538913	2539213	275490	275783	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC285.10c	ccr4	SPCC285.10c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933311975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765888	2538913	2543477	275490	279897	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAPB2B4.04c	ccr4	SPAPB2B4.04c	SPCC5E4.02c	pmc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.023626862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765889	2538913	2541746	275490	278240	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC20G4.04c	ccr4	hus1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.875111003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765890	2538913	2543011	275490	279449	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC10F6.11c	ccr4	atg17	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.286519373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765891	2538913	2539812	275490	276362	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC1347.02	ccr4	fkbp39	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378110254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765892	2538913	2540193	275490	276726	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC1289.10c	ccr4	adn2	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.163154454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765893	2538913	2540930	275490	277446	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC354.10	ccr4	def1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.736857781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765894	2538913	2540691	275490	277216	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC20F10.05	ccr4	nrl1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.315814648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765895	2538913	2542602	275490	279056	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC186.09	ccr4	SPAC186.09	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814771739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765896	2538913	2541742	275490	278236	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC22H10.09	ccr4	SPAC22H10.09	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.744841284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765897	2538913	2541793	275490	278284	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC22H10.02	ccr4	SPAC22H10.02	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.719307044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765898	2538913	2541896	275490	278386	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC23H4.16c	ccr4	SPAC23H4.16c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046994814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765899	2538913	2540946	275490	277462	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC36.04	ccr4	cys11	SPCC5E4.02c	cys1a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.814558278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765900	2538913	2542869	275490	279314	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC140.02	ccr4	gar2	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.334033445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765901	2538913	2541762	275490	278256	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC139.01c	ccr4	SPAC139.01c	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC955.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812776179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765902	2538913	2539595	275490	276153	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC965.14c	ccr4	SPCC965.14c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038576692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765903	2538913	2542875	275490	279320	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC13G7.02c	ccr4	ssa1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.870882662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765904	2538913	2540918	275490	277434	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC800.02	ccr4	whi5	SPCC5E4.02c	mug54	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.445490199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765905	2538913	2541713	275490	278208	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC3A12.12	ccr4	atp11	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.834114031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765906	2538913	2539908	275490	276454	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC13E7.06	ccr4	msd1	SPCC5E4.02c	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634678906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765907	2538913	2541525	275490	278025	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC27D7.02c	ccr4	SPAC27D7.02c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.121082182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765908	2538913	2540910	275490	277426	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC577.02	ccr4	rpl3801	SPCC5E4.02c	rpl38-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.878407071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765909	2538913	2542283	275490	278751	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC27F1.08	ccr4	pdt1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.254465699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765910	2538913	2542806	275490	279254	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1610.01	ccr4	saf5	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.335330937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765911	2538913	2543113	275490	279545	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC3F10.07c	ccr4	erf4	SPCC5E4.02c	mug91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.869503046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765912	2538913	2542198	275490	278673	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC6F12.09	ccr4	rdp1	SPCC5E4.02c	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.273182413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765913	2538913	2540701	275490	277225	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC19C7.08c	ccr4	SPBC19C7.08c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.270036482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765914	2538913	2539160	275490	275732	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC18.17c	ccr4	SPCC18.17c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.260464651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765915	2538913	2540442	275490	276970	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC25B2.04c	ccr4	mtg1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.183919694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765916	2538913	2539354	275490	275920	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC4F11.03c	ccr4	SPCC4F11.03c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.493269545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765917	2538913	2541156	275490	277671	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC685.07c	ccr4	rpl2701	SPCC5E4.02c	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.746212158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765918	2538913	2539809	275490	276359	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC16E9.02c	ccr4	SPBC16E9.02c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.414260718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765919	2538913	2540519	275490	277047	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC21C3.14c	ccr4	SPBC21C3.14c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.847737524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765920	2538913	2542327	275490	278793	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC16C9.06c	ccr4	upf1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.118718928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765921	2538913	2540242	275490	276774	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC32F12.07c	ccr4	SPBC32F12.07c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.021363214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765922	2538913	2541175	275490	277689	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC839.13c	ccr4	rpl1601	SPCC5E4.02c	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.435383029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765923	2538913	2542847	275490	279293	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1420.01c	ccr4	SPAC1420.01c	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC56E4.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.337411646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765924	2538913	2543670	275490	280084	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAPB1E7.06c	ccr4	eme1	SPCC5E4.02c	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.163118467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765925	2538913	2541981	275490	278466	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC23A1.04c	ccr4	mnl1	SPCC5E4.02c	htm1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873529144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765926	2538913	2541909	275490	278399	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC227.01c	ccr4	erd1	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.983812628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765927	2538913	2542883	275490	279328	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1486.04c	ccr4	alm1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.606129704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765928	2538913	2540779	275490	277298	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC19F8.06c	ccr4	meu22	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.617869443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765929	2538913	2542915	275490	279357	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC6C3.06c	ccr4	SPAC6C3.06c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.819113924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765930	2538913	5802917	275490	858055	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC17A2.14	ccr4	SPAC17A2.14	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC17G6.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.385385549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765931	2538913	2539600	275490	276158	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCP1E11.03	ccr4	mug170	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645880329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765932	2538913	2540648	275490	277173	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC1921.05	ccr4	ape2	SPCC5E4.02c	ape1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.197955009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765933	2538913	2540800	275490	277319	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC409.20c	ccr4	psh3	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.165405601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765934	2538913	2543304	275490	279728	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC6B12.12	ccr4	tom70	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.964188637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765935	2538913	2540384	275490	276913	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC29A10.11c	ccr4	vps902	SPCC5E4.02c	vps9b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095783988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765936	2538913	2540881	275490	277398	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC577.14c	ccr4	spa1	SPCC5E4.02c	spa	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.404274714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765937	2538913	2542113	275490	278589	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1B3.11c	ccr4	ypt4	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.338767315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765938	2538913	2538966	275490	275540	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC18.10	ccr4	SPCC18.10	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.847686882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765939	2538913	2540998	275490	277514	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC3D6.05	ccr4	ptp4	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.225245851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765940	2538913	2540464	275490	276992	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC23E6.02	ccr4	rrp2	SPCC5E4.02c	SPBC23E6.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.766849306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765941	2538913	2543096	275490	279528	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC977.05c	ccr4	SPAC977.05c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.767709239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765942	2538913	2538962	275490	275536	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC965.13	ccr4	SPCC965.13	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.836371931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765943	2538913	2541279	275490	277792	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC8E4.03	ccr4	SPBC8E4.03	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.177773375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765944	2538913	2540657	275490	277182	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC1E8.02	ccr4	SPBC1E8.02	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.387209217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765945	2538913	2539614	275490	276172	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC17D11.08	ccr4	SPBC17D11.08	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.595556001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765946	2538913	2541358	275490	277869	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBP4H10.16c	ccr4	SPBP4H10.16c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.639053578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765947	2538913	2541100	275490	277615	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC651.04	ccr4	SPBC651.04	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453852332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765948	2538913	2540935	275490	277451	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC359.04c	ccr4	pfl7	SPCC5E4.02c	SPBC359.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.853786694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765949	2538913	2541432	275490	277937	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1F5.05c	ccr4	mso1	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.445391708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765950	2538913	2539707	275490	276260	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC17F3.01c	ccr4	rga5	SPCC5E4.02c	SPBC557.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.411123572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765951	2538913	2540977	275490	277493	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC3E7.02c	ccr4	hsp16	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390123733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765952	2538913	2541459	275490	277961	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC227.11c	ccr4	SPAC227.11c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.869046659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765953	2538913	2540725	275490	277248	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC215.14c	ccr4	vps20	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815170941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765954	2538913	2539471	275490	276034	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC576.14	ccr4	dph5	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.376409652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765955	2538913	2543368	275490	279790	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC630.06c	ccr4	SPAC630.06c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.504994051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765956	2538913	2541531	275490	278031	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC25A8.01c	ccr4	fft3	SPCC5E4.02c	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.227672483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765957	2538913	2541470	275490	277972	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAPYUG7.04c	ccr4	rpb9	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.075383417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765958	2538913	2540829	275490	277347	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC800.09	ccr4	sum2	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.274882018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765959	2538913	2542731	275490	279181	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC5H10.09c	ccr4	SPAC5H10.09c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.923313527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765960	2538913	2543329	275490	279752	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC56F8.02	ccr4	SPAC56F8.02	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.674901238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765961	2538913	2540325	275490	276855	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC21B10.10	ccr4	rps402	SPCC5E4.02c	rps4-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093622492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765962	2538913	2542418	275490	278881	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1805.07c	ccr4	dad2	SPCC5E4.02c	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.502935586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765963	2538913	2543377	275490	279799	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC3H1.07	ccr4	aru1	SPCC5E4.02c	car3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.821512011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765964	2538913	2541036	275490	277551	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC3H7.05c	ccr4	SPBC3H7.05c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634108437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765965	2538913	3361329	275490	280405	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC25H2.10c	ccr4	SPBC25H2.10c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.618435262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765966	2538913	2541149	275490	277664	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC651.03c	ccr4	gyp10	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145349829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765967	2538913	2539514	275490	276076	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC663.14c	ccr4	trp663	SPCC5E4.02c	SPCC663.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.848438539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765968	2538913	2542222	275490	278695	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC31G5.18c	ccr4	sde2	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.536283781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765969	2538913	2543228	275490	279656	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC6B12.04c	ccr4	SPAC6B12.04c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633234127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765970	2538913	2542826	275490	279273	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC13G6.09	ccr4	SPAC13G6.09	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.679000972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765971	2538913	2539668	275490	276223	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC11B10.10c	ccr4	pht1	SPCC5E4.02c	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.074209479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765972	2538913	2541404	275490	277913	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBPB2B2.18	ccr4	SPBPB2B2.18	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.337124549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765973	2538913	2541380	275490	277891	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBPB2B2.13	ccr4	gal1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.715882087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765974	2538913	2543602	275490	280017	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAPB1A11.04c	ccr4	mca1	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAPB1A11.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462916289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765975	2538913	2541789	275490	278281	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC23H4.08	ccr4	iwr1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.837660431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765976	2538913	2539998	275490	276542	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC16G5.03	ccr4	SPBC16G5.03	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928858787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765977	2538913	2540182	275490	276715	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC16G5.06	ccr4	SPBC16G5.06	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.185841689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765978	2538913	2543420	275490	279842	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC3H1.04c	ccr4	mdm31	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.536470708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765979	2538913	2543582	275490	279997	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC4H3.06	ccr4	SPAC4H3.06	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.765410344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765980	2538913	2542262	275490	278731	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC17C9.10	ccr4	stm1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.14648542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765981	2538913	2539928	275490	276472	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC1604.08c	ccr4	imp1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991633885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765982	2538913	2540422	275490	276950	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC27.08c	ccr4	sua1	SPCC5E4.02c	SPBC28F2.01c|asp1|met3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.043584023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765983	2538913	2541244	275490	277758	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC8D2.02c	ccr4	vps68	SPCC5E4.02c	SPBC8D2.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.917485857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765984	2538913	2539702	275490	276255	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC1604.12	ccr4	SPBC1604.12	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.439077163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765985	2538913	2541637	275490	278133	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC57A10.04	ccr4	mug10	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.718215416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765986	2538913	2540333	275490	276863	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC21B10.07	ccr4	SPBC21B10.07	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.266397699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765987	2538913	2539920	275490	276464	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC119.08	ccr4	pmk1	SPCC5E4.02c	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.754490255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765988	2538913	2540896	275490	277412	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC19C2.13c	ccr4	ctu2	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.620988048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765989	2538913	2542186	275490	278661	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC17C9.14	ccr4	SPAC17C9.14	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.283562623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765990	2538913	2543380	275490	279802	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC4G9.16c	ccr4	rpl901	SPCC5E4.02c	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.82123018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765991	2538913	2543072	275490	279505	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC3A12.09c	ccr4	SPAC3A12.09c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048037628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765992	2538913	2541941	275490	278428	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC20H4.03c	ccr4	tfs1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.198955681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765993	2538913	2540504	275490	277032	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC24C6.10c	ccr4	dip1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.07335657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765994	2538913	2541657	275490	278153	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAP27G11.15	ccr4	slx1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.567978813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765995	2538913	2541946	275490	278433	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC2G11.04	ccr4	SPAC2G11.04	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815984257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765996	2538913	3361410	275490	280486	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1527.01	ccr4	mok11	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC23D3.15	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.746266542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765997	2538913	2541238	275490	277752	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC8E4.05c	ccr4	SPBC8E4.05c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.258384826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765998	2538913	2540683	275490	277208	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC19G7.04	ccr4	SPBC19G7.04	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.379412094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
765999	2538913	2542716	275490	279169	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC25H1.07	ccr4	emc1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.818923763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766000	2538913	2543220	275490	279648	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAPB21F2.02	ccr4	SPAPB21F2.02	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.687110061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766001	2538913	2539700	275490	276253	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC1685.15c	ccr4	klp6	SPCC5E4.02c	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.994784982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766002	2538913	2543384	275490	279806	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC637.06	ccr4	gmh5	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77196299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766003	2538913	2540108	275490	276645	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC13E7.11	ccr4	rbd1	SPCC5E4.02c	SPBC13E7.11|rh1|SPBC30D10.19c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983925761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766004	2538913	3361481	275490	280557	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAPB24D3.05c	ccr4	SPAPB24D3.05c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876977064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766005	2538913	2543387	275490	279809	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAPB1E7.02c	ccr4	mcl1	SPCC5E4.02c	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.183459842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766006	2538913	2543327	275490	279750	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1D4.06c	ccr4	csk1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.208937402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766007	2538913	2543471	275490	279891	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC513.07	ccr4	SPAC513.07	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.201405797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766008	2538913	2541029	275490	277544	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC409.10	ccr4	ade7	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.271270083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766009	2538913	2540828	275490	277346	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC4B4.06	ccr4	vps25	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205670828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766010	2538913	2542175	275490	278650	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1F3.02c	ccr4	mkh1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.68489894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766011	2538913	2542566	275490	279022	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC8C9.12c	ccr4	SPAC8C9.12c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989213159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766012	2538913	2539768	275490	276319	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC1703.09	ccr4	SPBC1703.09	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193684865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766013	2538913	2540360	275490	276889	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC2G5.01	ccr4	SPBC2G5.01	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.623635579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766014	2538913	2541375	275490	277886	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBP8B7.31	ccr4	SPBP8B7.31	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.713076438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766015	2538913	2541334	275490	277845	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBP4H10.18c	ccr4	SPBP4H10.18c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817979906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766016	2538913	2541646	275490	278142	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC750.06c	ccr4	SPAC750.06c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931267915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766017	2538913	2543372	275490	279794	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAPB1A10.09	ccr4	ase1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.13561685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766018	2538913	2543523	275490	279941	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC4F10.16c	ccr4	SPAC4F10.16c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820927832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766019	2538913	2543644	275490	280058	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAPB1A10.03	ccr4	nxt1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.695557255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766020	2538913	2543333	275490	279756	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC694.02	ccr4	SPAC694.02	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.199080595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766021	2538913	2540372	275490	276901	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC31F10.03	ccr4	SPBC31F10.03	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980617206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766022	2538913	2541359	275490	277870	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBPB2B2.05	ccr4	SPBPB2B2.05	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.718026797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766023	2538913	2542890	275490	279334	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC13G6.14	ccr4	aps1	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC24B11.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.461223855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766024	2538913	2538696	275490	275281	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC569.06	ccr4	SPCC569.06	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.126797323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766025	2538913	2541124	275490	277639	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC646.02	ccr4	cwf11	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991166035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766026	2538913	2540067	275490	276605	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC16H5.05c	ccr4	cyp7	SPCC5E4.02c	cwf27	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.402618486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766027	2538913	2543624	275490	280038	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC4D7.06c	ccr4	SPAC4D7.06c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.869754367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766028	2538913	2542943	275490	279384	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC1348.03	ccr4	SPBC1348.03	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.545773373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766029	2538913	2542087	275490	278564	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC26F1.02	ccr4	pnn1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.668084297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766030	2538913	2542073	275490	278550	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC26F1.01	ccr4	sec74	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAPJ691.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044577553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766031	2538913	2541576	275490	278073	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC1348.02	ccr4	SPBC1348.02	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC1348.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.871007889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766032	2538913	2541732	275490	278226	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC22H10.08	ccr4	SPAC22H10.08	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.272208798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766033	2538913	2542094	275490	278571	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC29B12.06c	ccr4	rcd1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852750968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766034	2538913	3361512	275490	280588	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC3C7.01c	ccr4	sac12	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814579611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766035	2538913	2542617	275490	279071	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC13A11.01c	ccr4	rga8	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.215185032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766036	2538913	2540734	275490	277257	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC19G7.09	ccr4	ulp1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.686805298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766037	2538913	2542836	275490	279282	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC13G7.06	ccr4	met16	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.344849193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766038	2538913	2541116	275490	277631	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC609.04	ccr4	caf5	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875754399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766039	2538913	2542208	275490	278683	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC17G8.08c	ccr4	SPAC17G8.08c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384691356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766040	2538913	2542578	275490	279034	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC18B11.09c	ccr4	SPAC18B11.09c	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.074527148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766041	2538913	2542571	275490	279027	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC589.02c	ccr4	med13	SPCC5E4.02c	spTrap240|srb9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635596934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766042	2538976	2539050	275550	275623	SPCC1840.04	SPCC11E10.08	pca1	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.558997444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766043	2538976	2543565	275550	279981	SPCC1840.04	SPAPB24D3.04c	pca1	mag1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.030483031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766044	2538976	2543617	275550	280031	SPCC1840.04	SPAC4A8.10	pca1	SPAC4A8.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.518210736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766045	2538976	2538993	275550	275567	SPCC1840.04	SPCC162.12	pca1	tco89	-	SPCC1753.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330694885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766046	2538976	2542237	275550	278709	SPCC1840.04	SPAC19E9.02	pca1	fin1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193518107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766047	2538976	2539930	275550	276474	SPCC1840.04	SPBC1198.11c	pca1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.802060217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766048	2538976	2543432	275550	279852	SPCC1840.04	SPAC4G8.05	pca1	ppk14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.842778305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766049	2538976	2541951	275550	278438	SPCC1840.04	SPAC222.05c	pca1	mss1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642401677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766050	2538976	2542816	275550	279263	SPCC1840.04	SPAC4G8.11c	pca1	atp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388400857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766051	2538976	2541498	275550	278000	SPCC1840.04	SPAC227.10	pca1	SPAC227.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.83732921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766052	2538976	2543681	275550	280095	SPCC1840.04	SPAC9.02c	pca1	SPAC9.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.053344548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766053	2538976	2543048	275550	279483	SPCC1840.04	SPAC3F10.02c	pca1	trk1	-	sptrk	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.36354923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766054	2538976	2540993	275550	277509	SPCC1840.04	SPBC342.01c	pca1	alg6	-	SPBC3F6.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994738128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766055	2538976	2542969	275550	279409	SPCC1840.04	SPAC4G8.10	pca1	gos1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.703133979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766056	2538976	2541522	275550	278023	SPCC1840.04	SPAC23E2.01	pca1	fep1	-	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.314567144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766057	2538976	2540023	275550	276567	SPCC1840.04	SPBC11C11.10	pca1	SPBC11C11.10	-	SPBC3B8.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.058103359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766058	2538976	2540222	275550	276755	SPCC1840.04	SPBC32F12.03c	pca1	gpx1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.50642902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766059	2538976	2539051	275550	275624	SPCC1840.04	SPCC1183.11	pca1	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.848520416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766060	2538976	2540797	275550	277316	SPCC1840.04	SPBC18H10.11c	pca1	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.768266021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766061	2538976	2542776	275550	279225	SPCC1840.04	SPAC167.01	pca1	ire1	-	ppk4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.266859044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766062	2538976	2541876	275550	278366	SPCC1840.04	SPAP27G11.11c	pca1	SPAP27G11.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708646483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766063	2538976	2541109	275550	277624	SPCC1840.04	SPBC6B1.02	pca1	ppk30	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989320507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766064	2538976	2543245	275550	279673	SPCC1840.04	SPAC56F8.06c	pca1	alg10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.33568361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766065	2538976	2540665	275550	277190	SPCC1840.04	SPBC83.02c	pca1	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382931832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766066	2538976	2543178	275550	279608	SPCC1840.04	SPAC31G5.15	pca1	psd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331479821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766067	2538976	2539974	275550	276518	SPCC1840.04	SPBC32H8.07	pca1	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.439320345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766068	2538976	2542529	275550	278987	SPCC1840.04	SPAC1B3.04c	pca1	SPAC1B3.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707071995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766069	2538976	2541614	275550	278111	SPCC1840.04	SPAC29A4.20	pca1	elp3	-	kat9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09585216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766070	2538976	2540229	275550	276761	SPCC1840.04	SPBC31F10.15c	pca1	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.375914477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766071	2538976	2541488	275550	277990	SPCC1840.04	SPAC227.17c	pca1	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636882361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766072	2538976	2541713	275550	278208	SPCC1840.04	SPAC3A12.12	pca1	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195675536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766073	2538976	2542170	275550	278645	SPCC1840.04	SPAC17G8.13c	pca1	mst2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319179606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766074	2538976	2540959	275550	277475	SPCC1840.04	SPBC365.12c	pca1	ish1	-	isp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934803535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766075	2538976	2542547	275550	279004	SPCC1840.04	SPACUNK4.09	pca1	SPACUNK4.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.699025181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766076	2538976	2542286	275550	278754	SPCC1840.04	SPAC1786.01c	pca1	ptl2	-	SPAC1786.01c|SPAC31G5.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319080974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766077	2538976	2543670	275550	280084	SPCC1840.04	SPAPB1E7.06c	pca1	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506689576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766078	2538976	2543662	275550	280076	SPCC1840.04	SPAC9.07c	pca1	SPAC9.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874483373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766079	2538976	2542731	275550	279181	SPCC1840.04	SPAC5H10.09c	pca1	SPAC5H10.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815299787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766080	2538976	2542091	275550	278568	SPCC1840.04	SPAC7D4.02c	pca1	sfp47	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.76245822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766081	2538976	2539920	275550	276464	SPCC1840.04	SPBC119.08	pca1	pmk1	-	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.829332794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766082	2538976	2543124	275550	279556	SPCC1840.04	SPAC3A11.06	pca1	mvp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811377329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766083	2538976	3361481	275550	280557	SPCC1840.04	SPAPB24D3.05c	pca1	SPAPB24D3.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.836293623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766084	2538976	2538718	275550	275302	SPCC1840.04	SPCC4B3.06c	pca1	SPCC4B3.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.502967941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766085	2538976	2541808	275550	278299	SPCC1840.04	SPAC22A12.14c	pca1	SPAC22A12.14c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809296931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766086	2538976	2541272	275550	277786	SPCC1840.04	SPBC947.03c	pca1	naa38	-	mak31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391924097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766087	2538976	2542571	275550	279027	SPCC1840.04	SPAC589.02c	pca1	med13	-	spTrap240|srb9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.322129077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766088	2541361	2539165	277872	275736	SPBP8B7.10c	SPCC1281.04	utp16	SPCC1281.04	SPBP8B7.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.337939969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766089	2541361	2539930	277872	276474	SPBP8B7.10c	SPBC1198.11c	utp16	reb1	SPBP8B7.10c	SPBC660.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.90077534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766090	2541361	2540686	277872	277211	SPBP8B7.10c	SPBC21D10.10	utp16	bdc1	SPBP8B7.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.401659958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766091	2541361	2539890	277872	276436	SPBP8B7.10c	SPBC16C6.03c	utp16	SPBC16C6.03c	SPBP8B7.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.12265073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766092	2541361	2542701	277872	279154	SPBP8B7.10c	SPAC26H5.05	utp16	mga2	SPBP8B7.10c	SPAC26H5.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.610087185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766093	2541361	2538801	277872	275382	SPBP8B7.10c	SPCC285.13c	utp16	nup60	SPBP8B7.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.166848275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766094	2541361	2542555	277872	279012	SPBP8B7.10c	SPAC1952.06c	utp16	SPAC1952.06c	SPBP8B7.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.206556371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766095	2541361	2543542	277872	279959	SPBP8B7.10c	SPAC823.09c	utp16	SPAC823.09c	SPBP8B7.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926681996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766096	2541361	2542568	277872	279024	SPBP8B7.10c	SPAC1952.02	utp16	tma23	SPBP8B7.10c	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.942920264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766097	2541361	2539388	277872	275953	SPBP8B7.10c	SPCC24B10.12	utp16	cgi121	SPBP8B7.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.251232433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766098	2541361	2540231	277872	276763	SPBP8B7.10c	SPBC336.14c	utp16	ppk26	SPBP8B7.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.288357111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766099	2541361	2542519	277872	278977	SPBP8B7.10c	SPAC19G12.08	utp16	scs7	SPBP8B7.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392025796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766100	2541361	2538926	277872	275502	SPBP8B7.10c	SPCC306.07c	utp16	SPCC306.07c	SPBP8B7.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.928136697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766101	2541361	2541614	277872	278111	SPBP8B7.10c	SPAC29A4.20	utp16	elp3	SPBP8B7.10c	kat9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.512921491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766102	2541361	2542550	277872	279007	SPBP8B7.10c	SPAC1B3.02c	utp16	SPAC1B3.02c	SPBP8B7.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.907158608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766103	2541361	2543011	277872	279449	SPBP8B7.10c	SPAC10F6.11c	utp16	atg17	SPBP8B7.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.032588405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766104	2541361	2541786	277872	278278	SPBP8B7.10c	SPAC22F3.08c	utp16	rok1	SPBP8B7.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.620943305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766105	2541361	2539354	277872	275920	SPBP8B7.10c	SPCC4F11.03c	utp16	SPCC4F11.03c	SPBP8B7.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.198652269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766106	2541361	2539925	277872	276469	SPBP8B7.10c	SPBC16H5.13	utp16	SPBC16H5.13	SPBP8B7.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.88753154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766107	2541361	2543304	277872	279728	SPBP8B7.10c	SPAC6B12.12	utp16	tom70	SPBP8B7.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.054513667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766108	2541361	2540699	277872	277223	SPBP8B7.10c	SPBC800.08	utp16	gcd10	SPBP8B7.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091322646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766109	2541361	2540325	277872	276855	SPBP8B7.10c	SPBC21B10.10	utp16	rps402	SPBP8B7.10c	rps4-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930428671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766110	2541361	2539136	277872	275708	SPBP8B7.10c	SPCC1919.05	utp16	SPCC1919.05	SPBP8B7.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.940125609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766111	2541361	2543602	277872	280017	SPBP8B7.10c	SPAPB1A11.04c	utp16	mca1	SPBP8B7.10c	SPAPB1A11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.119777153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766112	2541361	2539375	277872	275941	SPBP8B7.10c	SPCC4G3.11	utp16	mug154	SPBP8B7.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.294447485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766113	2541361	2543277	277872	279705	SPBP8B7.10c	SPAC1002.03c	utp16	gls2	SPBP8B7.10c	gls2alpha	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.971653019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766114	2541361	2543387	277872	279809	SPBP8B7.10c	SPAPB1E7.02c	utp16	mcl1	SPBP8B7.10c	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.595166014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766115	2541361	2543076	277872	279509	SPBP8B7.10c	SPAC30C2.07	utp16	SPAC30C2.07	SPBP8B7.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441518713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766116	2541361	2538947	277872	275521	SPBP8B7.10c	SPCC1682.12c	utp16	ubp16	SPBP8B7.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.005941852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766117	2541361	2541732	277872	278226	SPBP8B7.10c	SPAC22H10.08	utp16	SPAC22H10.08	SPBP8B7.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452468297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766118	2539258	2538706	275828	275290	SPCC1620.04c	SPCC338.08	mug55	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.653947492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766119	2539258	2543628	275828	280042	SPCC1620.04c	SPAC3H8.10	mug55	spo20	-	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.079426532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766120	2539258	2543602	275828	280017	SPCC1620.04c	SPAPB1A11.04c	mug55	mca1	-	SPAPB1A11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.078506642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766121	2539258	2543472	275828	279892	SPCC1620.04c	SPAC959.04c	mug55	omh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842267761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766122	2540999	2541562	277515	278061	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC24B11.05	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC24B11.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388755278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766123	2540999	2543617	277515	280031	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC4A8.10	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC4A8.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.33623876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766124	2540999	2541971	277515	278456	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC27F1.05c	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC27F1.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043978068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766125	2540999	2541343	277515	277854	SPBC4B4.04	SPBPB2B2.19c	SPBC4B4.04	SPBPB2B2.19c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.608544949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766126	2540999	2541512	277515	278013	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC11E3.08c	SPBC4B4.04	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.768453154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766127	2540999	2540528	277515	277056	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC18H10.04c	SPBC4B4.04	sce3	-	tif48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.664519545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766128	2540999	2539035	277515	275608	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC794.09c	SPBC4B4.04	tef101	-	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.319767744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766129	2540999	2539939	277515	276483	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC11G11.01	SPBC4B4.04	fis1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504076005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766130	2540999	2542546	277515	279003	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC1399.05c	SPBC4B4.04	toe1	-	SPAC1399.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.568496874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766131	2540999	2543434	277515	279854	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC8F11.02c	SPBC4B4.04	dph3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87398169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766132	2540999	2542614	277515	279068	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC1399.04c	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC1399.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930687818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766133	2540999	2542613	277515	279067	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC18B11.03c	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC18B11.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991603004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766134	2540999	2543658	277515	280072	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC644.09	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC644.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038049185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766135	2540999	2540015	277515	276559	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC1685.02c	SPBC4B4.04	rps1202	-	rps12-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817902272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766136	2540999	2541408	277515	277916	SPBC4B4.04	SPBPB2B2.14c	SPBC4B4.04	SPBPB2B2.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767736565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766137	2540999	2542050	277515	278529	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC212.02	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC212.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.989500617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766138	2540999	2540979	277515	277495	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC3H7.10	SPBC4B4.04	elp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.461402195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766139	2540999	2541313	277515	277825	SPBC4B4.04	SPBP26C9.02c	SPBC4B4.04	car1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.465370911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766140	2540999	2543156	277515	279587	SPBC4B4.04	SPAP8A3.13c	SPBC4B4.04	SPAP8A3.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.442236918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766141	2540999	2541682	277515	278178	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC15F9.02	SPBC4B4.04	seh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.93418957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766142	2540999	2540029	277515	276573	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC16A3.01	SPBC4B4.04	spn3	-	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.56522525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766143	2540999	2539249	277515	275819	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC1450.05c	SPBC4B4.04	rox3	-	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.550538963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766144	2540999	2540929	277515	277445	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC354.03	SPBC4B4.04	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.190852896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766145	2540999	2542165	277515	278641	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC1782.08c	SPBC4B4.04	rex3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.009601747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766146	2540999	2542969	277515	279409	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC4G8.10	SPBC4B4.04	gos1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.698839243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766147	2540999	2541580	277515	278077	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC1687.05	SPBC4B4.04	pli1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.628600984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766148	2540999	2543584	277515	279999	SPBC4B4.04	SPAPB1E7.11c	SPBC4B4.04	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152716598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766149	2540999	2541416	277515	277923	SPBC4B4.04	SPBCPT2R1.01c	SPBC4B4.04	SPBCPT2R1.01c	-	SPBPB2B2.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.195100458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766150	2540999	2539980	277515	276524	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC1773.14	SPBC4B4.04	arg7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.56946464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766151	2540999	2543573	277515	279988	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC869.11	SPBC4B4.04	cat1	-	SPAC922.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45144629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766152	2540999	2539023	277515	275596	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC594.05c	SPBC4B4.04	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.679083538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766153	2540999	2539237	277515	275807	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC24B10.13	SPBC4B4.04	skb5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.457143633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766154	2540999	2539388	277515	275953	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC24B10.12	SPBC4B4.04	cgi121	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.846607234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766155	2540999	2539051	277515	275624	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC1183.11	SPBC4B4.04	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.682561951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766156	2540999	2542177	277515	278652	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC17H9.08	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039517975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766157	2540999	2540892	277515	277408	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC530.01	SPBC4B4.04	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978752377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766158	2540999	2541776	277515	278270	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC4B4.04	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.508848579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766159	2540999	2543445	277515	279865	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC4F10.13c	SPBC4B4.04	mpd2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514026453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766160	2540999	2543483	277515	279903	SPBC4B4.04	SPAPB2B4.02	SPBC4B4.04	grx5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447500131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766161	2540999	2542699	277515	279152	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC5H10.07	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC5H10.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867753839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766162	2540999	2543412	277515	279834	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC637.07	SPBC4B4.04	moe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.481801726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766163	2540999	2539733	277515	276285	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC4B4.04	pab2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990507719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766164	2540999	2540150	277515	276687	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC16E9.14c	SPBC4B4.04	zrg17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042109613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766165	2540999	2542464	277515	278925	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC1A6.09c	SPBC4B4.04	lag1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512562197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766166	2540999	2538800	277515	275381	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC1322.06	SPBC4B4.04	kap113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.749048435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766167	2540999	2540543	277515	277070	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC29A10.06c	SPBC4B4.04	ely5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449590944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766168	2540999	2542235	277515	278707	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC18G6.05c	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC18G6.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205323963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766169	2540999	2542921	277515	279362	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC1093.01	SPBC4B4.04	ppr5	-	SPAC12B10.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.816575307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766170	2540999	2539857	277515	276404	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC4B4.04	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707613803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766171	2540999	2538994	277515	275568	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC553.01c	SPBC4B4.04	dbl2	-	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876505736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766172	2540999	2543101	277515	279533	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC323.03c	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC323.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.263731233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766173	2540999	2543250	277515	279678	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC3G9.15c	SPBC4B4.04	fcf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.276193693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766174	2540999	2538769	277515	275352	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC126.04c	SPBC4B4.04	sgf73	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.048877088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766175	2540999	2540136	277515	276673	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC1347.11	SPBC4B4.04	sro1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381428749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766176	2540999	2540997	277515	277513	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC3H7.06c	SPBC4B4.04	pof9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.305048054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766177	2540999	2538837	277515	275418	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC4B3.03c	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC4B3.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.987885135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766178	2540999	2543378	277515	279800	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC4B4.04	pac10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.402449138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766179	2540999	2541900	277515	278390	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC4B4.04	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.080296692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766180	2540999	2542214	277515	278688	SPBC4B4.04	SPACUNK4.11c	SPBC4B4.04	mpp6	-	SPACUNK4.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.10302852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766181	2540999	2539481	277515	276044	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC622.16c	SPBC4B4.04	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.975922319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766182	2540999	2538767	277515	275350	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC1672.12c	SPBC4B4.04	get4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989016143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766183	2540999	5802861	277515	857999	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC1D4.01	SPBC4B4.04	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.077916284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766184	2540999	2543683	277515	280097	SPBC4B4.04	SPAPB1E7.04c	SPBC4B4.04	SPAPB1E7.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.979854283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766185	2540999	2539368	277515	275934	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC16A11.07	SPBC4B4.04	coq10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.758966616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766186	2540999	2540599	277515	277125	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC29A3.10c	SPBC4B4.04	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443271075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766187	2540999	2538828	277515	275409	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC1020.05	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC1020.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.901670166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766188	2540999	2539172	277515	275743	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC1020.08	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC1020.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808026046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766189	2540999	2539052	277515	275625	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC663.09c	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC663.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925477053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766190	2540999	2539427	277515	275992	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC663.15c	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC663.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.558848822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766191	2540999	2541266	277515	277780	SPBC4B4.04	SPBP16F5.05c	SPBC4B4.04	yar1	-	SPBP16F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.411358447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766192	2540999	2540882	277515	277399	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC4F6.08c	SPBC4B4.04	mrpl39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701144031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766193	2540999	2541614	277515	278111	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC4B4.04	elp3	-	kat9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.273785026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766194	2540999	2538884	277515	275462	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC1393.08	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.194620637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766195	2540999	2541017	277515	277532	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC36.07	SPBC4B4.04	elp1	-	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147030678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766196	2540999	2540643	277515	277168	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC19G7.06	SPBC4B4.04	mbx1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.862726959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766197	2540999	2542869	277515	279314	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC140.02	SPBC4B4.04	gar2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807576266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766198	2540999	2541713	277515	278208	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC4B4.04	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.122635363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766199	2540999	2542170	277515	278645	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC4B4.04	mst2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.854177775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766200	2540999	2543332	277515	279755	SPBC4B4.04	SPAPB8E5.04c	SPBC4B4.04	SPAPB8E5.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581744864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766201	2540999	2540226	277515	276758	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC32H8.08c	SPBC4B4.04	omh5	-	pi016|SPACTOKYO_453.20	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.260864985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766202	2540999	2538762	277515	275345	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC306.04c	SPBC4B4.04	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.049549134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766203	2540999	2539555	277515	276116	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC4B3.08	SPBC4B4.04	lsg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.849824043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766204	2540999	2541175	277515	277689	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC839.13c	SPBC4B4.04	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19620819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766205	2540999	2543106	277515	279538	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC3A11.13	-	SPAC3H5.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.167567619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766206	2540999	2543670	277515	280084	SPBC4B4.04	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC4B4.04	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047519978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766207	2540999	2540498	277515	277026	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC27.02c	SPBC4B4.04	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.738100654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766208	2540999	2539600	277515	276158	SPBC4B4.04	SPCP1E11.03	SPBC4B4.04	mug170	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645229384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766209	2540999	2540648	277515	277173	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC1921.05	SPBC4B4.04	ape2	-	ape1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842479883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766210	2540999	2543304	277515	279728	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC4B4.04	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.484060375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766211	2540999	2543096	277515	279528	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC977.05c	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771434538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766212	2540999	2540733	277515	277256	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC4.01	SPBC4B4.04	dni2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446817125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766213	2540999	2543192	277515	279621	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC343.18	SPBC4B4.04	rfp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452690564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766214	2540999	2543066	277515	279499	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC343.12	SPBC4B4.04	rds1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.554036083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766215	2540999	2539239	277515	275809	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC1020.10	SPBC4B4.04	oca2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.893498969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766216	2540999	2538756	277515	275339	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC1795.10c	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC1795.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.85057623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766217	2540999	2541531	277515	278031	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC4B4.04	fft3	-	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.693889902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766218	2540999	2541470	277515	277972	SPBC4B4.04	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC4B4.04	rpb9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.050126228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766219	2540999	2540304	277515	276834	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC354.13	SPBC4B4.04	rga6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.920772861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766220	2540999	2543329	277515	279752	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC56F8.02	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC56F8.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514423108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766221	2540999	2542076	277515	278553	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC29A4.19c	SPBC4B4.04	cta5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.646893645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766222	2540999	2541404	277515	277913	SPBC4B4.04	SPBPB2B2.18	SPBC4B4.04	SPBPB2B2.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.023319305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766223	2540999	2541380	277515	277891	SPBC4B4.04	SPBPB2B2.13	SPBC4B4.04	gal1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.596406548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766224	2540999	2542416	277515	278880	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC589.03c	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC589.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.563148719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766225	2540999	2543109	277515	279541	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC3G6.09c	SPBC4B4.04	tps2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.99326421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766226	2540999	2543019	277515	279455	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC57A10.03	SPBC4B4.04	cyp1	-	cyp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320154808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766227	2540999	2539205	277515	275775	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC4B4.04	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.05274379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766228	2540999	2539169	277515	275740	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC1235.11	SPBC4B4.04	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.009473336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766229	2540999	2542716	277515	279169	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC25H1.07	SPBC4B4.04	emc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152632353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766230	2540999	2543220	277515	279648	SPBC4B4.04	SPAPB21F2.02	SPBC4B4.04	SPAPB21F2.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.80731587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766231	2540999	2543384	277515	279806	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC637.06	SPBC4B4.04	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.060856432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766232	2540999	2543387	277515	279809	SPBC4B4.04	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC4B4.04	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634200179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766233	2540999	2543374	277515	279796	SPBC4B4.04	SPAPB1A10.08	SPBC4B4.04	SPAPB1A10.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51316657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766234	2540999	2538947	277515	275521	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC1682.12c	SPBC4B4.04	ubp16	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149057692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766235	2540999	2543090	277515	279523	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC1348.01	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC1348.01	-	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321785745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766236	2540999	2540383	277515	276912	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC31E1.02c	SPBC4B4.04	pmr1	-	cps5|pgak2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.922257805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766237	2540999	2542943	277515	279384	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC1348.03	SPBC4B4.04	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331705948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766238	2540999	2543501	277515	279919	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC664.14	SPBC4B4.04	amt2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.661048333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766239	2542329	2543617	278795	280031	SPAC9G1.10c	SPAC4A8.10	SPAC9G1.10c	SPAC4A8.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.847731897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766240	2542329	2540956	278795	277472	SPAC9G1.10c	SPBC409.06	SPAC9G1.10c	uch2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.088523017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766241	2542329	2539264	278795	275834	SPAC9G1.10c	SPCC550.10	SPAC9G1.10c	atd3	-	meu8	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.806759017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766242	2542329	2542484	278795	278944	SPAC9G1.10c	SPAC1A6.07	SPAC9G1.10c	sle1	-	SPAC1A6.07|seg1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.551281874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766243	2542329	2540892	278795	277408	SPAC9G1.10c	SPBC530.01	SPAC9G1.10c	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994594819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766244	2542329	2541776	278795	278270	SPAC9G1.10c	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC9G1.10c	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.389337248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766245	2542329	2541160	278795	277675	SPAC9G1.10c	SPBC725.09c	SPAC9G1.10c	hob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.970748643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766246	2542329	2541889	278795	278379	SPAC9G1.10c	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC9G1.10c	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.869169885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766247	2542329	2541496	278795	277998	SPAC9G1.10c	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC9G1.10c	arp42	-	arp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.504256821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766248	2542329	2542528	278795	278986	SPAC9G1.10c	SPAC1B3.08	SPAC9G1.10c	SPAC1B3.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.165720103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766249	2542329	2540751	278795	277273	SPAC9G1.10c	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC9G1.10c	psl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.460477086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766250	2542329	2542753	278795	279203	SPAC9G1.10c	SPAC1687.09	SPAC9G1.10c	SPAC1687.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.15474597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766251	2542329	2541927	278795	278415	SPAC9G1.10c	SPAC222.12c	SPAC9G1.10c	atp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503688739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766252	2542329	2540333	278795	276863	SPAC9G1.10c	SPBC21B10.07	SPAC9G1.10c	SPBC21B10.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036557842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766253	2542329	2539205	278795	275775	SPAC9G1.10c	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC9G1.10c	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.584374378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766254	2542329	2540270	278795	276801	SPAC9G1.10c	SPBC2G2.02	SPAC9G1.10c	syj1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.86950438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766255	2542329	2540146	278795	276683	SPAC9G1.10c	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC9G1.10c	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.802246776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766256	2540460	2540060	276988	276598	SPBC2A9.07c	SPBC106.01	hpz1	mph1	SPBC2A9.07c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.071849472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766257	2540460	2542677	276988	279130	SPBC2A9.07c	SPAC26F1.10c	hpz1	pyp1	SPBC2A9.07c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709195673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766258	2540460	2542767	276988	279217	SPBC2A9.07c	SPAC1565.07c	hpz1	knd1	SPBC2A9.07c	SPAC1565.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.941678072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766259	2540460	2540064	276988	276602	SPBC2A9.07c	SPBC1718.02	hpz1	hop1	SPBC2A9.07c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580102318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766260	2540460	2540936	276988	277452	SPBC2A9.07c	SPBC800.05c	hpz1	atb2	SPBC2A9.07c	alp2|ban5|tub1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.412717843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766261	2541028	2543529	277543	279947	SPBC577.08c	SPAC4C5.02c	txl1	ryh1	trx3	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.60332849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766262	2541028	2540455	277543	276983	SPBC577.08c	SPBC215.05	txl1	gpd1	trx3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.381875088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766263	2541028	2538847	277543	275428	SPBC577.08c	SPCC594.06c	txl1	SPCC594.06c	trx3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.12607176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766264	2541028	2542689	277543	279142	SPBC577.08c	SPAC29B12.04	txl1	snz1	trx3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.848040681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766265	2541028	2543641	277543	280055	SPBC577.08c	SPAC3H5.08c	txl1	SPAC3H5.08c	trx3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.111530578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766266	2541028	2542791	277543	279240	SPBC577.08c	SPAC167.04	txl1	pam17	trx3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.516354158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766267	2541028	2542160	277543	278636	SPBC577.08c	SPAC8C9.11	txl1	fra2	trx3	SPAC8C9.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.74575298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766268	2541028	2541708	277543	278203	SPBC577.08c	SPAC31A2.02	txl1	trm112	trx3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.33113123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766269	2541028	2539205	277543	275775	SPBC577.08c	SPCC4B3.15	txl1	mid1	trx3	dmf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.659944884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766270	2541028	2542566	277543	279022	SPBC577.08c	SPAC8C9.12c	txl1	SPAC8C9.12c	trx3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.441344732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766271	2539673	2542895	276228	279339	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC13G6.10c	mug81	asl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.461339493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766272	2539673	2541562	276228	278061	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC24B11.05	mug81	SPAC24B11.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57357176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766273	2539673	2541656	276228	278152	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC25H1.06	mug81	pcf3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392790477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766274	2539673	2541912	276228	278402	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC222.16c	mug81	csn3	-	SPAC821.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388114206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766275	2539673	2539165	276228	275736	SPBC13G1.10c	SPCC1281.04	mug81	SPCC1281.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040833546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766276	2539673	2543339	276228	279762	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC630.13c	mug81	tsc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323326302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766277	2539673	3361119	276228	280195	SPBC13G1.10c	SPCC663.07c	mug81	SPCC663.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.71208804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766278	2539673	2542963	276228	279403	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC1071.03c	mug81	sil1	-	SPAC1071.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447417103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766279	2539673	2543434	276228	279854	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC8F11.02c	mug81	dph3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388890799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766280	2539673	2541286	276228	277799	SPBC13G1.10c	SPBC9B6.11c	mug81	SPBC9B6.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.070745211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766281	2539673	2539332	276228	275898	SPBC13G1.10c	SPCPB1C11.01	mug81	amt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194435199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766282	2539673	2541086	276228	277601	SPBC13G1.10c	SPBC685.04c	mug81	aps2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386932547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766283	2539673	2539443	276228	276006	SPBC13G1.10c	SPCC736.02	mug81	SPCC736.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.990273227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766284	2539673	2539564	276228	276125	SPBC13G1.10c	SPCC550.12	mug81	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865495105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766285	2539673	2543542	276228	279959	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC823.09c	mug81	SPAC823.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.972675264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766286	2539673	2542318	276228	278784	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC16C9.05	mug81	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708965099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766287	2539673	2539792	276228	276342	SPBC13G1.10c	SPBC1271.14	mug81	SPBC1271.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87203056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766288	2539673	2540364	276228	276893	SPBC13G1.10c	SPBC29B5.02c	mug81	isp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713910292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766289	2539673	2543563	276228	279979	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC664.02c	mug81	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.753088021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766290	2539673	2541522	276228	278023	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC23E2.01	mug81	fep1	-	gaf2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923555695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766291	2539673	2543573	276228	279988	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC869.11	mug81	cat1	-	SPAC922.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.671074454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766292	2539673	2539388	276228	275953	SPBC13G1.10c	SPCC24B10.12	mug81	cgi121	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778985143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766293	2539673	2540892	276228	277408	SPBC13G1.10c	SPBC530.01	mug81	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770088518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766294	2539673	2540401	276228	276929	SPBC13G1.10c	SPBC2A9.02	mug81	SPBC2A9.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.050350175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766295	2539673	2538770	276228	275353	SPBC13G1.10c	SPCC1753.02c	mug81	git3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196026658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766296	2539673	2543483	276228	279903	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAPB2B4.02	mug81	grx5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924022326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766297	2539673	2539990	276228	276534	SPBC13G1.10c	SPBC1289.14	mug81	SPBC1289.14	-	SPBC8E4.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328145837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766298	2539673	2539898	276228	276444	SPBC13G1.10c	SPBC12D12.07c	mug81	trx2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987796893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766299	2539673	2540886	276228	277403	SPBC13G1.10c	SPBC4F6.10	mug81	vps901	-	vps9a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866621747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766300	2539673	2539371	276228	275937	SPBC13G1.10c	SPCC18B5.06	mug81	dom34	-	SPCC18B5.06|erf1|sup45	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.708688778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766301	2539673	2542235	276228	278707	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC18G6.05c	mug81	SPAC18G6.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.754353074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766302	2539673	2541955	276228	278442	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC5D6.04	mug81	SPAC5D6.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.560412967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766303	2539673	2542946	276228	279386	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC6F12.03c	mug81	fsv1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.509692348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766304	2539673	2542976	276228	279414	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC9E9.09c	mug81	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869085978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766305	2539673	2539850	276228	276398	SPBC13G1.10c	SPBC15D4.07c	mug81	atg9	-	apg9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.133745089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766306	2539673	2538841	276228	275422	SPBC13G1.10c	SPCC550.03c	mug81	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.030409717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766307	2539673	2543378	276228	279800	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC3H8.07c	mug81	pac10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932884335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766308	2539673	2538935	276228	275511	SPBC13G1.10c	SPCC1682.11c	mug81	ctl1	-	SPCC1682.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.620189774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766309	2539673	2541389	276228	277900	SPBC13G1.10c	SPBPB2B2.09c	mug81	SPBPB2B2.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576802869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766310	2539673	2538780	276228	275361	SPBC13G1.10c	SPCC1840.07c	mug81	SPCC1840.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.644327945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766311	2539673	2541708	276228	278203	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC31A2.02	mug81	trm112	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647825359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766312	2539673	2540967	276228	277483	SPBC13G1.10c	SPBC36B7.08c	mug81	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.910967867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766313	2539673	2542255	276228	278725	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC57A7.08	mug81	pzh1	-	phz1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820482276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766314	2539673	2539519	276228	276081	SPBC13G1.10c	SPCC364.05	mug81	vps3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.662344512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766315	2539673	2542973	276228	279412	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC10F6.04	mug81	SPAC10F6.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331138066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766316	2539673	2541742	276228	278236	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC22H10.09	mug81	SPAC22H10.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.192308753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766317	2539673	3361520	276228	280596	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC1610.02c	mug81	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.747101119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766318	2539673	2542806	276228	279254	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC1610.01	mug81	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.820696373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766319	2539673	2541156	276228	277671	SPBC13G1.10c	SPBC685.07c	mug81	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.984296401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766320	2539673	2543051	276228	279486	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC1071.08	mug81	rpp203	-	rla6|rpp2-3|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707487196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766321	2539673	2541371	276228	277882	SPBC13G1.10c	SPBP4H10.17c	mug81	SPBP4H10.17c	-	mrps2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.054067426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766322	2539673	2542401	276228	278865	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC1142.02c	mug81	SPAC1142.02c	-	SPAC17G6.19c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.705845955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766323	2539673	2542915	276228	279357	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC6C3.06c	mug81	SPAC6C3.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.264494051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766324	2539673	2543304	276228	279728	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC6B12.12	mug81	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.33115481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766325	2539673	2538714	276228	275298	SPBC13G1.10c	SPCC330.11	mug81	btb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.939377662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766326	2539673	2539239	276228	275809	SPBC13G1.10c	SPCC1020.10	mug81	oca2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877651292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766327	2539673	2539471	276228	276034	SPBC13G1.10c	SPCC576.14	mug81	dph5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.782508063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766328	2539673	2543329	276228	279752	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC56F8.02	mug81	SPAC56F8.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.447200869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766329	2539673	2539136	276228	275708	SPBC13G1.10c	SPCC1919.05	mug81	SPCC1919.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.115493199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766330	2539673	2541773	276228	278267	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC23H4.02	mug81	ppk9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810539305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766331	2539673	2542250	276228	278720	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC17D4.03c	mug81	cis4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816887808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766332	2539673	2540422	276228	276950	SPBC13G1.10c	SPBC27.08c	mug81	sua1	-	SPBC28F2.01c|asp1|met3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984364068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766333	2539673	2539375	276228	275941	SPBC13G1.10c	SPCC4G3.11	mug81	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.041893517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766334	2539673	2542871	276228	279316	SPBC13G1.10c	SPAC6F12.10c	mug81	ade3	-	min11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713119342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766335	2539673	2540208	276228	276741	SPBC13G1.10c	SPBC9B6.03	mug81	SPBC9B6.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983254269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766336	2539673	2540734	276228	277257	SPBC13G1.10c	SPBC19G7.09	mug81	ulp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92777875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766337	3361381	2538847	280457	275428	SPAC12G12.01c	SPCC594.06c	SPAC12G12.01c	SPCC594.06c	SPAC630.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.288839652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766338	3361381	2543681	280457	280095	SPAC12G12.01c	SPAC9.02c	SPAC12G12.01c	SPAC9.02c	SPAC630.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258133545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766339	3361381	2542023	280457	278506	SPAC12G12.01c	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC12G12.01c	ufd2	SPAC630.02	SPAC145.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.074597523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766340	3361381	2542513	280457	278971	SPAC12G12.01c	SPAC1952.05	SPAC12G12.01c	gcn5	SPAC630.02	kat2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043427709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766341	3361381	2540338	280457	276867	SPAC12G12.01c	SPBC2G2.13c	SPAC12G12.01c	dcd1	SPAC630.02	SPBC2G2.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990892585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766342	3361381	2543396	280457	279818	SPAC12G12.01c	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC12G12.01c	dsc4	SPAC630.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.804109786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766343	3361381	2542126	280457	278602	SPAC12G12.01c	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC12G12.01c	not3	SPAC630.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194903193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766344	3361381	2541762	280457	278256	SPAC12G12.01c	SPAC139.01c	SPAC12G12.01c	SPAC139.01c	SPAC630.02	SPAC955.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389762249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766345	3361381	2541404	280457	277913	SPAC12G12.01c	SPBPB2B2.18	SPAC12G12.01c	SPBPB2B2.18	SPAC630.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994336869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766346	3361381	2539205	280457	275775	SPAC12G12.01c	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC12G12.01c	mid1	SPAC630.02	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.526633649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766347	2539641	2540347	276196	276876	SPBC14C8.01c	SPBC30B4.08	cut2	eri1	SPBC1815.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.542415639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766348	2539641	2540686	276196	277211	SPBC14C8.01c	SPBC21D10.10	cut2	bdc1	SPBC1815.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.317527511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766349	2539641	2538922	276196	275499	SPBC14C8.01c	SPCC16C4.10	cut2	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC1815.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.840310574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766350	2539641	2539420	276196	275985	SPBC14C8.01c	SPCC970.07c	cut2	raf2	SPBC1815.02c	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.650929113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766351	2539641	2540160	276196	276695	SPBC14C8.01c	SPBC1773.17c	cut2	SPBC1773.17c	SPBC1815.02c	SPBP26C9.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.899263877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766352	2539641	2540727	276196	277250	SPBC14C8.01c	SPBC1921.03c	cut2	mex67	SPBC1815.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.11945018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766353	2539641	2539441	276196	276004	SPBC14C8.01c	SPCPJ732.02c	cut2	xks1	SPBC1815.02c	SPCPJ732.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.347927253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766354	2539641	2538823	276196	275404	SPBC14C8.01c	SPCC18B5.02c	cut2	SPCC18B5.02c	SPBC1815.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.241575197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766355	2539641	2539175	276196	275746	SPBC14C8.01c	SPCC16C4.01	cut2	sif2	SPBC1815.02c	SPCC5E4.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.079527965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766356	2539641	2540893	276196	277409	SPBC14C8.01c	SPBC543.10	cut2	get1	SPBC1815.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.67493798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766357	2539641	2539051	276196	275624	SPBC14C8.01c	SPCC1183.11	cut2	msy1	SPBC1815.02c	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.242065739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766358	2539641	2539705	276196	276258	SPBC14C8.01c	SPBC1105.10	cut2	rav1	SPBC1815.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452063726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766359	2539641	2540403	276196	276931	SPBC14C8.01c	SPBC21D10.11c	cut2	nfs1	SPBC1815.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.696418895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766360	2539641	2538723	276196	275307	SPBC14C8.01c	SPCC31H12.06	cut2	mug111	SPBC1815.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.328707135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766361	2539641	2541900	276196	278390	SPBC14C8.01c	SPAC23H4.17c	cut2	srb10	SPBC1815.02c	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.362491893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766362	2539641	2539376	276196	275942	SPBC14C8.01c	SPCC5E4.10c	cut2	SPCC5E4.10c	SPBC1815.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.044501518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766363	2539641	2539344	276196	275910	SPBC14C8.01c	SPCC1672.09	cut2	SPCC1672.09	SPBC1815.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.679060174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766364	2539641	2540882	276196	277399	SPBC14C8.01c	SPBC4F6.08c	cut2	mrpl39	SPBC1815.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.841835112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766365	2539641	2540643	276196	277168	SPBC14C8.01c	SPBC19G7.06	cut2	mbx1	SPBC1815.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.41724388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766366	2539641	2538844	276196	275425	SPBC14C8.01c	SPCC1183.09c	cut2	pmp31	SPBC1815.02c	mug75	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.45008593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766367	2539641	3361193	276196	280269	SPBC14C8.01c	SPBC19G7.18c	cut2	SPBC19G7.18c	SPBC1815.02c	SPBC19G7.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.474619362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766368	2539641	2539816	276196	276366	SPBC14C8.01c	SPBC12C2.04	cut2	SPBC12C2.04	SPBC1815.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57713212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766369	2539641	2539013	276196	275586	SPBC14C8.01c	SPCC364.03	cut2	rpl1702	SPBC1815.02c	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.602100179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766370	2539641	2539359	276196	275925	SPBC14C8.01c	SPCC16C4.06c	cut2	pus3	SPBC1815.02c	SPCC16C4.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.939458518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766371	2539641	2538916	276196	275493	SPBC14C8.01c	SPCC16C4.17	cut2	mug123	SPBC1815.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.68636439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766372	2539641	2539736	276196	276288	SPBC14C8.01c	SPBC12C2.12c	cut2	glo1	SPBC1815.02c	SPBC21D10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.571454252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766373	2539641	2543387	276196	279809	SPBC14C8.01c	SPAPB1E7.02c	cut2	mcl1	SPBC1815.02c	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.334060355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766374	2539641	2539014	276196	275587	SPBC14C8.01c	SPCC18B5.05c	cut2	SPCC18B5.05c	SPBC1815.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.435270563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766375	2539641	3361295	276196	280371	SPBC14C8.01c	SPBC1921.01c	cut2	rpl35b	SPBC1815.02c	rpl37|rpl37-1|rpl3701|SPBC29C10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.33039166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766376	2539641	2540734	276196	277257	SPBC14C8.01c	SPBC19G7.09	cut2	ulp1	SPBC1815.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.1439665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766377	2542433	2538993	278895	275567	SPAC17G6.14c	SPCC162.12	uap56	tco89	-	SPCC1753.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.312271085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766378	2542433	2538906	278895	275483	SPAC17G6.14c	SPCC1259.03	uap56	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.840927237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766379	2542433	2540599	278895	277125	SPAC17G6.14c	SPBC29A3.10c	uap56	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638722472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766380	2539420	2542072	275985	278549	SPCC970.07c	SPAP32A8.03c	raf2	bop1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	SPAP32A8.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.99595888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766381	2539420	2542207	275985	278682	SPCC970.07c	SPAC17H9.10c	raf2	ddb1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.087821398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766382	2539420	2539050	275985	275623	SPCC970.07c	SPCC11E10.08	raf2	rik1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.085688499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766383	2539420	2538721	275985	275305	SPCC970.07c	SPCC1494.10	raf2	adn3	clr7|cmc2|dos2	SPCC70.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.201853539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766384	2539420	2542862	275985	279308	SPCC970.07c	SPAC140.03	raf2	arb1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.387833152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766385	2539420	2541475	275985	277977	SPCC970.07c	SPAC24B11.09	raf2	mpc2	clr7|cmc2|dos2	SPAC24B11.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871607928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766386	2539420	2540060	275985	276598	SPCC970.07c	SPBC106.01	raf2	mph1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.49765138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766387	2539420	2543637	275985	280051	SPCC970.07c	SPAC3H8.02	raf2	csr102	clr7|cmc2|dos2	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.571597498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766388	2539420	2541512	275985	278013	SPCC970.07c	SPAC11E3.08c	raf2	nse6	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.438572479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766389	2539420	2539452	275985	276015	SPCC970.07c	SPCC70.03c	raf2	SPCC70.03c	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.120460382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766390	2539420	2543287	275985	279712	SPCC970.07c	SPAC9E9.05	raf2	SPAC9E9.05	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506059307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766391	2539420	2541552	275985	278051	SPCC970.07c	SPAC1142.08	raf2	fhl1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	SPAC8C9.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.312240458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766392	2539420	2542358	275985	278823	SPCC970.07c	SPAC1782.09c	raf2	clp1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.741547383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766393	2539420	2541650	275985	278146	SPCC970.07c	SPAC14C4.12c	raf2	laf1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.740545544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766394	2539420	2542378	275985	278842	SPCC970.07c	SPAC1805.04	raf2	nup132	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Nup133b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044285146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766395	2539420	2540528	275985	277056	SPCC970.07c	SPBC18H10.04c	raf2	sce3	clr7|cmc2|dos2	tif48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.860398397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766396	2539420	2542237	275985	278709	SPCC970.07c	SPAC19E9.02	raf2	fin1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.262360684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766397	2539420	2538929	275985	275505	SPCC970.07c	SPCC162.02c	raf2	SPCC162.02c	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.777692353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766398	2539420	2541438	275985	277943	SPCC970.07c	SPAC23G3.10c	raf2	ssr3	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.831150423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766399	2539420	2541856	275985	278347	SPCC970.07c	SPAC23H3.08c	raf2	bub3	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.451545278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766400	2539420	2541633	275985	278129	SPCC970.07c	SPAC664.01c	raf2	swi6	clr7|cmc2|dos2	SPAC824.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.998570107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766401	2539420	2541733	275985	278227	SPCC970.07c	SPAC27F1.03c	raf2	uch1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.845041637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766402	2539420	2543434	275985	279854	SPCC970.07c	SPAC8F11.02c	raf2	dph3	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.883144802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766403	2539420	2541771	275985	278265	SPCC970.07c	SPAC23H3.06	raf2	apl6	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.564114303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766404	2539420	2542103	275985	278579	SPCC970.07c	SPAC31G5.11	raf2	pac2	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709456669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766405	2539420	2540975	275985	277491	SPCC970.07c	SPBC354.12	raf2	gpd3	clr7|cmc2|dos2	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.201781196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766406	2539420	2540979	275985	277495	SPCC970.07c	SPBC3H7.10	raf2	elp6	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.63233125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766407	2539420	2541092	275985	277607	SPCC970.07c	SPBC660.12c	raf2	egt2	clr7|cmc2|dos2	SPBC660.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.565597547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766408	2539420	2539564	275985	276125	SPCC970.07c	SPCC550.12	raf2	arp6	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.336849059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766409	2539420	2540919	275985	277435	SPCC970.07c	SPBC543.07	raf2	pek1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	mkk1|skh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925403508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766410	2539420	2540945	275985	277461	SPCC970.07c	SPBC342.06c	raf2	rtt109	clr7|cmc2|dos2	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.242998425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766411	2539420	2540313	275985	276843	SPCC970.07c	SPBC337.04	raf2	ppk27	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.305876159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766412	2539420	2542135	275985	278611	SPCC970.07c	SPAC13A11.04c	raf2	ubp8	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038511964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766413	2539420	2542318	275985	278784	SPCC970.07c	SPAC16C9.05	raf2	cph1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.40014789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766414	2539420	2542277	275985	278746	SPCC970.07c	SPAC17A5.02c	raf2	dbr1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.855381283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766415	2539420	2543685	275985	280099	SPCC970.07c	SPAC3C7.03c	raf2	rad55	clr7|cmc2|dos2	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.35592543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766416	2539420	2540595	275985	277121	SPCC970.07c	SPBC21C3.02c	raf2	dep1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.802644242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766417	2539420	2542220	275985	278694	SPCC970.07c	SPAC1A6.03c	raf2	SPAC1A6.03c	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633484852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766418	2539420	2543584	275985	279999	SPCC970.07c	SPAPB1E7.11c	raf2	SPAPB1E7.11c	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.680238086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766419	2539420	2543078	275985	279511	SPCC970.07c	SPAC31A2.15c	raf2	dcc1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.215457925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766420	2539420	2538906	275985	275483	SPCC970.07c	SPCC1259.03	raf2	rpa12	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.80591679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766421	2539420	2540825	275985	277343	SPCC970.07c	SPBC428.08c	raf2	clr4	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.224009704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766422	2539420	2541021	275985	277536	SPCC970.07c	SPBC3B8.10c	raf2	nem1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992886527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766423	2539420	2542665	275985	279118	SPCC970.07c	SPAC10F6.08c	raf2	nht10	clr7|cmc2|dos2	nht1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.244511132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766424	2539420	2542554	275985	279011	SPCC970.07c	SPAC1952.03	raf2	otu2	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.637399744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766425	2539420	2542568	275985	279024	SPCC970.07c	SPAC1952.02	raf2	tma23	clr7|cmc2|dos2	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.006963232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766426	2539420	2542239	275985	278711	SPCC970.07c	SPAC18G6.02c	raf2	chp1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.930509545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766427	2539420	2539960	275985	276504	SPCC970.07c	SPBC15D4.15	raf2	pho2	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.219661658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766428	2539420	2539032	275985	275605	SPCC970.07c	SPCC4B3.05c	raf2	hem12	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381904138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766429	2539420	2539467	275985	276030	SPCC970.07c	SPCC417.07c	raf2	mto1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.610419865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766430	2539420	2542311	275985	278777	SPCC970.07c	SPAC16A10.05c	raf2	dad1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.941329572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766431	2539420	2543514	275985	279932	SPCC970.07c	SPAC4D7.03	raf2	pop2	clr7|cmc2|dos2	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.782740186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766432	2539420	2538876	275985	275455	SPCC970.07c	SPCC4B3.02c	raf2	SPCC4B3.02c	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.434627103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766433	2539420	2539003	275985	275577	SPCC970.07c	SPCC1442.17c	raf2	ist1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	SPCC285.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.502318793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766434	2539420	2540631	275985	277157	SPCC970.07c	SPBC25B2.10	raf2	SPBC25B2.10	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322716827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766435	2539420	2541801	275985	278292	SPCC970.07c	SPAC2F7.08c	raf2	snf5	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.002351938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766436	2539420	2542513	275985	278971	SPCC970.07c	SPAC1952.05	raf2	gcn5	clr7|cmc2|dos2	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.214412906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766437	2539420	2541982	275985	278467	SPCC970.07c	SPAC23A1.06c	raf2	cmk2	clr7|cmc2|dos2	mkp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.481331804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766438	2539420	2539984	275985	276528	SPCC970.07c	SPBC1289.11	raf2	spf38	clr7|cmc2|dos2	cwf17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.097397306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766439	2539420	2542123	275985	278599	SPCC970.07c	SPAC18G6.15	raf2	mal3	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.729667203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766440	2539420	2538706	275985	275290	SPCC970.07c	SPCC338.08	raf2	ctp1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.079544295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766441	2539420	2542507	275985	278965	SPCC970.07c	SPAC18G6.13	raf2	SPAC18G6.13	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.327397745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766442	2539420	2539073	275985	275645	SPCC970.07c	SPCC1322.02	raf2	pxd1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	SPCC1322.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.740580037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766443	2539420	2541943	275985	278430	SPCC970.07c	SPAC222.07c	raf2	hri2	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.659703765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766444	2539420	2543531	275985	279949	SPCC970.07c	SPAC926.06c	raf2	SPAC926.06c	clr7|cmc2|dos2	lrr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633011958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766445	2539420	2539454	275985	276017	SPCC970.07c	SPCC622.15c	raf2	SPCC622.15c	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.70884464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766446	2539420	2541496	275985	277998	SPCC970.07c	SPAC23D3.09	raf2	arp42	clr7|cmc2|dos2	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.731999384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766447	2539420	2539603	275985	276161	SPCC970.07c	SPBC1289.06c	raf2	ppr8	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455039504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766448	2539420	2541929	275985	278417	SPCC970.07c	SPAC23C4.12	raf2	hhp2	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037611528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766449	2539420	2543246	275985	279674	SPCC970.07c	SPAPB8E5.05	raf2	mfm1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.850605785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766450	2539420	2538871	275985	275450	SPCC970.07c	SPCC1259.14c	raf2	meu27	clr7|cmc2|dos2	B8647-6	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638351146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766451	2539420	2541352	275985	277863	SPCC970.07c	SPBPJ4664.03	raf2	mfm3	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.840552085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766452	2539420	2543118	275985	279550	SPCC970.07c	SPAC3G6.11	raf2	chl1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.227876563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766453	2539420	2542857	275985	279303	SPCC970.07c	SPAC144.06	raf2	apl5	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579248545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766454	2539420	2541824	275985	278315	SPCC970.07c	SPAC27E2.02	raf2	SPAC27E2.02	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.118654003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766455	2539420	2538769	275985	275352	SPCC970.07c	SPCC126.04c	raf2	sgf73	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.158956348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766456	2539420	2542861	275985	279307	SPCC970.07c	SPAC13G7.13c	raf2	msa1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	SPAC6C3.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.821858069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766457	2539420	2540665	275985	277190	SPCC970.07c	SPBC83.02c	raf2	rpl4302	clr7|cmc2|dos2	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.188343476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766458	2539420	2542007	275985	278490	SPCC970.07c	SPAC20H4.07	raf2	rad57	clr7|cmc2|dos2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.134556386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766459	2539420	2540751	275985	277273	SPCC970.07c	SPBC20F10.10	raf2	psl1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.072115256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766460	2539420	2540224	275985	276757	SPCC970.07c	SPBC32H8.06	raf2	mug93	clr7|cmc2|dos2	pi018|SPACTOKYO_453.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.455615953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766461	2539420	2539974	275985	276518	SPCC970.07c	SPBC32H8.07	raf2	git5	clr7|cmc2|dos2	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.879128328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766462	2539420	2543392	275985	279814	SPCC970.07c	SPAC8F11.03	raf2	msh3	clr7|cmc2|dos2	swi4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387118374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766463	2539420	2539232	275985	275802	SPCC970.07c	SPCC1223.04c	raf2	set11	clr7|cmc2|dos2	mug76	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.553275333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766464	2539420	2542254	275985	278724	SPCC970.07c	SPAC30D11.04c	raf2	nup124	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.696962342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766465	2539420	2541900	275985	278390	SPCC970.07c	SPAC23H4.17c	raf2	srb10	clr7|cmc2|dos2	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.424056713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766466	2539420	2539481	275985	276044	SPCC970.07c	SPCC622.16c	raf2	epe1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	kdm2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.266659563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766467	2539420	2539027	275985	275600	SPCC970.07c	SPCC1322.08	raf2	srk1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	mkp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.338333905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766468	2539420	2541009	275985	277524	SPCC970.07c	SPBC428.04	raf2	apq12	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.055062738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766469	2539420	2539215	275985	275785	SPCC970.07c	SPCC285.16c	raf2	msh6	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.429340578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766470	2539420	2540335	275985	276865	SPCC970.07c	SPBC30B4.03c	raf2	adn1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328843989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766471	2539420	2542056	275985	278535	SPCC970.07c	SPAC6G9.14	raf2	SPAC6G9.14	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.277306008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766472	2539420	2541389	275985	277900	SPCC970.07c	SPBPB2B2.09c	raf2	SPBPB2B2.09c	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.688759166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766473	2539420	2541694	275985	278190	SPCC970.07c	SPAC1071.04c	raf2	spc2	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317914617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766474	2539420	2538780	275985	275361	SPCC970.07c	SPCC1840.07c	raf2	SPCC1840.07c	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709814814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766475	2539420	2541959	275985	278446	SPCC970.07c	SPAC23C4.03	raf2	hrk1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.747778767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766476	2539420	2540967	275985	277483	SPCC970.07c	SPBC36B7.08c	raf2	SPBC36B7.08c	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.44637175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766477	2539420	2542773	275985	279222	SPCC970.07c	SPAC16.01	raf2	rho2	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.329717599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766478	2539420	2541266	275985	277780	SPCC970.07c	SPBP16F5.05c	raf2	yar1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	SPBP16F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.206183993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766479	2539420	2541614	275985	278111	SPCC970.07c	SPAC29A4.20	raf2	elp3	clr7|cmc2|dos2	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.494601641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766480	2539420	2541565	275985	278063	SPCC970.07c	SPAC1250.03	raf2	ubc14	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.486879313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766481	2539420	2542255	275985	278725	SPCC970.07c	SPAC57A7.08	raf2	pzh1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.549598314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766482	2539420	2539812	275985	276362	SPCC970.07c	SPBC1347.02	raf2	fkbp39	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.324639951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766483	2539420	2540193	275985	276726	SPCC970.07c	SPBC1289.10c	raf2	adn2	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.700821316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766484	2539420	2542781	275985	279230	SPCC970.07c	SPAC57A10.12c	raf2	ura3	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.065345945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766485	2539420	2543515	275985	279933	SPCC970.07c	SPAC4F10.14c	raf2	btf3	clr7|cmc2|dos2	btt1|egd1|nac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.946439977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766486	2539420	2540930	275985	277446	SPCC970.07c	SPBC354.10	raf2	def1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.429774944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766487	2539420	2540589	275985	277115	SPCC970.07c	SPBC20F10.06	raf2	mad2	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.135595522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766488	2539420	2541017	275985	277532	SPCC970.07c	SPBC36.07	raf2	elp1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.924945463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766489	2539420	2542869	275985	279314	SPCC970.07c	SPAC140.02	raf2	gar2	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.705300214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766490	2539420	2541628	275985	278124	SPCC970.07c	SPAC110.02	raf2	pds5	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.860461822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766491	2539420	2541762	275985	278256	SPCC970.07c	SPAC139.01c	raf2	SPAC139.01c	clr7|cmc2|dos2	SPAC955.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81216458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766492	2539420	2540918	275985	277434	SPCC970.07c	SPBC800.02	raf2	whi5	clr7|cmc2|dos2	mug54	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635189911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766493	2539420	2540821	275985	277339	SPCC970.07c	SPBC800.03	raf2	clr3	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.366526804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766494	2539420	2539932	275985	276476	SPCC970.07c	SPBC13E7.07	raf2	SPBC13E7.07	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773273653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766495	2539420	2539908	275985	276454	SPCC970.07c	SPBC13E7.06	raf2	msd1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.407610674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766496	2539420	2542198	275985	278673	SPCC970.07c	SPAC6F12.09	raf2	rdp1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	rdr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.118104901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766497	2539420	2541786	275985	278278	SPCC970.07c	SPAC22F3.08c	raf2	rok1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636456478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766498	2539420	2541222	275985	277736	SPCC970.07c	SPBC887.08	raf2	SPBC887.08	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925035184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766499	2539420	2539354	275985	275920	SPCC970.07c	SPCC4F11.03c	raf2	SPCC4F11.03c	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.618987244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766500	2539420	2542516	275985	278974	SPCC970.07c	SPAC2F7.04	raf2	pmc2	clr7|cmc2|dos2	med1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.416900792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766501	2539420	2540519	275985	277047	SPCC970.07c	SPBC21C3.14c	raf2	SPBC21C3.14c	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568746736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766502	2539420	2543619	275985	280033	SPCC970.07c	SPAC4F10.04	raf2	ypa1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.856272467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766503	2539420	2539555	275985	276116	SPCC970.07c	SPCC4B3.08	raf2	lsg1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.979568431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766504	2539420	2543670	275985	280084	SPCC970.07c	SPAPB1E7.06c	raf2	eme1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.448294053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766505	2539420	2543567	275985	279983	SPCC970.07c	SPAC890.03	raf2	ppk16	clr7|cmc2|dos2	mug92	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.182017372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766506	2539420	2540498	275985	277026	SPCC970.07c	SPBC27.02c	raf2	ask1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.858622702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766507	2539420	2542883	275985	279328	SPCC970.07c	SPAC1486.04c	raf2	alm1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.802336896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766508	2539420	2541372	275985	277883	SPCC970.07c	SPBP8B7.28c	raf2	stc1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.823242992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766509	2539420	2543662	275985	280076	SPCC970.07c	SPAC9.07c	raf2	SPAC9.07c	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.140976846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766510	2539420	2540115	275985	276652	SPCC970.07c	SPBC1778.02	raf2	rap1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.777254857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766511	2539420	2541470	275985	277972	SPCC970.07c	SPAPYUG7.04c	raf2	rpb9	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040513202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766512	2539420	2540829	275985	277347	SPCC970.07c	SPBC800.09	raf2	sum2	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.207280536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766513	2539420	2539136	275985	275708	SPCC970.07c	SPCC1919.05	raf2	SPCC1919.05	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.839771324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766514	2539420	2542418	275985	278881	SPCC970.07c	SPAC1805.07c	raf2	dad2	clr7|cmc2|dos2	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.252112538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766515	2539420	2540677	275985	277202	SPCC970.07c	SPBC21B10.03c	raf2	ath1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.321981799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766516	2539420	2539188	275985	275759	SPCC970.07c	SPCC1827.04	raf2	vms1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	SPCC1827.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815795601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766517	2539420	2539668	275985	276223	SPCC970.07c	SPBC11B10.10c	raf2	pht1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.896066519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766518	2539420	2541789	275985	278281	SPCC970.07c	SPAC23H4.08	raf2	iwr1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037412079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766519	2539420	2542693	275985	279146	SPCC970.07c	SPAC27D7.09c	raf2	SPAC27D7.09c	clr7|cmc2|dos2	SPAC27D7.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986700089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766520	2539420	2540936	275985	277452	SPCC970.07c	SPBC800.05c	raf2	atb2	clr7|cmc2|dos2	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.581084927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766521	2539420	2542442	275985	278904	SPCC970.07c	SPACUNK12.02c	raf2	cmk1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	CaMK-I|SPAC25D11.02C	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708625379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766522	2539420	2539920	275985	276464	SPCC970.07c	SPBC119.08	raf2	pmk1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	spm1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.079224643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766523	2539420	2540140	275985	276677	SPCC970.07c	SPBC16C6.08c	raf2	qcr6	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.976098812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766524	2539420	2540896	275985	277412	SPCC970.07c	SPBC19C2.13c	raf2	ctu2	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.576377835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766525	2539420	2543380	275985	279802	SPCC970.07c	SPAC4G9.16c	raf2	rpl901	clr7|cmc2|dos2	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708284313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766526	2539420	2541941	275985	278428	SPCC970.07c	SPAC20H4.03c	raf2	tfs1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.349557597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766527	2539420	2540808	275985	277327	SPCC970.07c	SPBC418.02	raf2	SPBC418.02	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091561958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766528	2539420	2543387	275985	279809	SPCC970.07c	SPAPB1E7.02c	raf2	mcl1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.177103104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766529	2539420	2540173	275985	276706	SPCC970.07c	SPBC106.13	raf2	SPBC106.13	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.084777727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766530	2539420	2542175	275985	278650	SPCC970.07c	SPAC1F3.02c	raf2	mkh1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1281013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766531	2539420	2540314	275985	276844	SPCC970.07c	SPBC2G5.03	raf2	ctu1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.178484852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766532	2539420	2542795	275985	279243	SPCC970.07c	SPAC9G1.05	raf2	aip1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	SPAC9G1.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.83455051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766533	2539420	2541050	275985	277565	SPCC970.07c	SPBC428.05c	raf2	arg12	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.079886096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766534	2539420	2541478	275985	277980	SPCC970.07c	SPAC2F7.17	raf2	mrf1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039588735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766535	2539420	2541491	275985	277993	SPCC970.07c	SPAC2C4.16c	raf2	rps801	clr7|cmc2|dos2	rps8|rps8-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.813341644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766536	2539420	2541808	275985	278299	SPCC970.07c	SPAC22A12.14c	raf2	SPAC22A12.14c	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.627796792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766537	2539420	2543372	275985	279794	SPCC970.07c	SPAPB1A10.09	raf2	ase1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.622387184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766538	2539420	2543523	275985	279941	SPCC970.07c	SPAC4F10.16c	raf2	SPAC4F10.16c	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091920531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766539	2539420	2542890	275985	279334	SPCC970.07c	SPAC13G6.14	raf2	aps1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	SPAC24B11.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.329979485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766540	2539420	2541062	275985	277577	SPCC970.07c	SPBC660.11	raf2	tcg1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321214026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766541	2539420	2540787	275985	277306	SPCC970.07c	SPBC1921.07c	raf2	sgf29	clr7|cmc2|dos2	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.024306096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766542	2543139	2540060	279571	276598	SPAC12G12.03	SPBC106.01	cip2	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.085954885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766543	2543139	2541208	279571	277722	SPAC12G12.03	SPBC887.04c	cip2	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.538828436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766544	2543139	2539823	279571	276373	SPAC12G12.03	SPBC16A3.18	cip2	cip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.208633491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766545	2543139	2541926	279571	278414	SPAC12G12.03	SPAC222.14c	cip2	SPAC222.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.603290205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766546	2543139	2539023	279571	275596	SPAC12G12.03	SPCC594.05c	cip2	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.128113839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766547	2543139	2538762	279571	275345	SPAC12G12.03	SPCC306.04c	cip2	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322059855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766548	2543139	2541175	279571	277689	SPAC12G12.03	SPBC839.13c	cip2	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.248961806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766549	2543139	2540498	279571	277026	SPAC12G12.03	SPBC27.02c	cip2	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.01903354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766550	2543139	2541531	279571	278031	SPAC12G12.03	SPAC25A8.01c	cip2	fft3	-	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.092217279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766551	2543139	2542418	279571	278881	SPAC12G12.03	SPAC1805.07c	cip2	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980179121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766552	2543139	2540936	279571	277452	SPAC12G12.03	SPBC800.05c	cip2	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.557178171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766553	2543139	2539375	279571	275941	SPAC12G12.03	SPCC4G3.11	cip2	mug154	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19976299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766554	2543139	2543372	279571	279794	SPAC12G12.03	SPAPB1A10.09	cip2	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.526991597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766555	2539495	2541902	276058	278392	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC27E2.07	ptc1	pvg2	-	mug53	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776409552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766556	2539495	2542430	276058	278892	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC17G6.06	ptc1	rps2401	-	rps24|rps24-1|rps24a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842277595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766557	2539495	3361210	276058	280286	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC16E9.16c	ptc1	lsd90	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.066401244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766558	2539495	2540105	276058	276642	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC106.04	ptc1	ada1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.638658976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766559	2539495	2540885	276058	277402	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC660.14	ptc1	mik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.700051899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766560	2539495	2542723	276058	279174	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC25H1.03	ptc1	atg101	-	mug66	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.757306055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766561	2539495	2543637	276058	280051	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC3H8.02	ptc1	csr102	-	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.040757249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766562	2539495	2542372	276058	278836	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC1F3.03	ptc1	SPAC1F3.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.703225615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766563	2539495	2541426	276058	277931	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC227.06	ptc1	SPAC227.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.557562241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766564	2539495	2540026	276058	276570	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC16D10.08c	ptc1	hsp104	-	SPBC16D10.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256576949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766565	2539495	2543291	276058	279716	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC9E9.04	ptc1	SPAC9E9.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.97676044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766566	2539495	2538977	276058	275551	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC1020.06c	ptc1	tal1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.57271423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766567	2539495	2540131	276058	276668	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC1778.05c	ptc1	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.12672379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766568	2539495	2539582	276058	276141	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC594.07c	ptc1	bqt3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.843085776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766569	2539495	2543575	276058	279990	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC644.13c	ptc1	SPAC644.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.032823837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766570	2539495	2540524	276058	277052	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC21B10.08c	ptc1	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.619638487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766571	2539495	2542378	276058	278842	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC1805.04	ptc1	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.006804307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766572	2539495	2539035	276058	275608	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC794.09c	ptc1	tef101	-	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.01126823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766573	2539495	3361561	276058	280637	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC11E3.01c	ptc1	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.970262736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766574	2539495	2541130	276058	277645	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC776.11	ptc1	rpl2801	-	rpl28-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.482774345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766575	2539495	2539939	276058	276483	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC11G11.01	ptc1	fis1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.76505148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766576	2539495	2543559	276058	279975	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC664.04c	ptc1	rps1602	-	rps16|rps16-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.803695099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766577	2539495	2541104	276058	277619	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC6B1.03c	ptc1	SPBC6B1.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.622853073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766578	2539495	2540296	276058	276827	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC2D10.05	ptc1	exg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.141800444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766579	2539495	2539350	276058	275916	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC24B10.17	ptc1	emp24	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.230933026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766580	2539495	2542098	276058	278574	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC30D11.01c	ptc1	gto2	-	SPAC30D11.01c|SPAC56F8.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.133553217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766581	2539495	2541188	276058	277702	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC83.16c	ptc1	SPBC83.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.453318551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766582	2539495	2543652	276058	280066	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC4H3.03c	ptc1	SPAC4H3.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326132621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766583	2539495	2540694	276058	277218	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC19C7.10	ptc1	bqt4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.810749996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766584	2539495	2542701	276058	279154	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC26H5.05	ptc1	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.51059981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766585	2539495	2542103	276058	278579	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC31G5.11	ptc1	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.437029787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766586	2539495	2539263	276058	275833	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC895.09c	ptc1	ucp12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.854774327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766587	2539495	2540717	276058	277240	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC577.12	ptc1	dph6	-	mug71	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708898379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766588	2539495	2541082	276058	277597	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC577.11	ptc1	SPBC577.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.638847969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766589	2539495	2542345	276058	278811	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC1705.02	ptc1	SPAC1705.02	-	SPAC1F2.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.116879829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766590	2539495	2542892	276058	279336	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC13F5.04c	ptc1	vta1	-	SPAC13F5.04c|new6|SPAC13F5.08|vts1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.561578575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766591	2539495	2540535	276058	277062	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC215.01	ptc1	SPBC215.01	-	SPBC3B9.20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.13280507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766592	2539495	2543320	276058	279744	SPCC4F11.02	SPAPJ695.01c	ptc1	SPAPJ695.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.144377742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766593	2539495	2542035	276058	278517	SPCC4F11.02	SPAP8A3.04c	ptc1	hsp9	-	scf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328805386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766594	2539495	2539226	276058	275796	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC16C4.20c	ptc1	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.753495181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766595	2539495	2542107	276058	278583	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC30.01c	ptc1	sec72	-	sec7b|sec702	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.980544885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766596	2539495	2541408	276058	277916	SPCC4F11.02	SPBPB2B2.14c	ptc1	SPBPB2B2.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.120041732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766597	2539495	2542050	276058	278529	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC212.02	ptc1	SPAC212.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.235076229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766598	2539495	2542677	276058	279130	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC26F1.10c	ptc1	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.568213645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766599	2539495	2541205	276058	277719	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC839.02	ptc1	SPBC839.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.853413391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766600	2539495	2542641	276058	279095	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC24C9.15c	ptc1	spn5	-	mde9|meu28	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.463258245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766601	2539495	2543156	276058	279587	SPCC4F11.02	SPAP8A3.13c	ptc1	SPAP8A3.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699848065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766602	2539495	2539913	276058	276457	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC11G11.03	ptc1	mrt4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.42172764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766603	2539495	2543145	276058	279577	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC4F8.15	ptc1	itr1	-	SPAC7D4.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506797081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766604	2539495	2539564	276058	276125	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC550.12	ptc1	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.323521256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766605	2539495	2539235	276058	275805	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC1682.15	ptc1	mug122	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.925728639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766606	2539495	2543590	276058	280005	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC4C5.03	ptc1	SPAC4C5.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.97968341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766607	2539495	2540029	276058	276573	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC16A3.01	ptc1	spn3	-	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.634296786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766608	2539495	2543043	276058	279478	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC3F10.13	ptc1	ucp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.499853961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766609	2539495	2539576	276058	276136	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC794.01c	ptc1	zwf2	-	SPCC794.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.837689208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766610	2539495	2543137	276058	279569	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC869.04	ptc1	SPAC869.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.322458415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766611	2539495	2540306	276058	276836	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC2G5.02c	ptc1	ckb2	-	SPBC2G5.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567047881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766612	2539495	2543453	276058	279873	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC3G9.03	ptc1	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.600920473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766613	2539495	2541026	276058	277541	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC337.09	ptc1	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.908922279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766614	2539495	2540220	276058	276753	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC337.03	ptc1	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.439418719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766615	2539495	2542627	276058	279081	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC750.04c	ptc1	SPAC750.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.434858415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766616	2539495	2540095	276058	276633	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC115.03	ptc1	SPBC115.03	-	SPBC839.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.49923778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766617	2539495	2540160	276058	276695	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC1773.17c	ptc1	SPBC1773.17c	-	SPBP26C9.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.643624377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766618	2539495	2541558	276058	278057	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC1F7.08	ptc1	fio1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.584475397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766619	2539495	2543048	276058	279483	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC3F10.02c	ptc1	trk1	-	sptrk	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.35840564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766620	2539495	2539937	276058	276481	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC1539.08	ptc1	arf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.500245692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766621	2539495	2542012	276058	278495	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC23C11.02c	ptc1	rps23	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515157139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766622	2539495	2539988	276058	276532	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC1271.05c	ptc1	SPBC1271.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450818213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766623	2539495	2540676	276058	277201	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC3E7.11c	ptc1	SPBC3E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377997191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766624	2539495	2540727	276058	277250	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC1921.03c	ptc1	mex67	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77975162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766625	2539495	2539895	276058	276441	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC1683.10c	ptc1	pcl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381447243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766626	2539495	2542165	276058	278641	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC1782.08c	ptc1	rex3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.119683578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766627	2539495	2541227	276058	277741	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC947.05c	ptc1	frp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.384758198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766628	2539495	2542318	276058	278784	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC16C9.05	ptc1	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.476666897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766629	2539495	2540482	276058	277010	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC25H2.14	ptc1	mug16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.680675664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766630	2539495	2542969	276058	279409	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC4G8.10	ptc1	gos1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.936774914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766631	2539495	2542277	276058	278746	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC17A5.02c	ptc1	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.677802799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766632	2539495	2543609	276058	280023	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC630.05	ptc1	gyp7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508850604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766633	2539495	2539792	276058	276342	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC1271.14	ptc1	SPBC1271.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.908069313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766634	2539495	2540467	276058	276995	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC2G2.07c	ptc1	mug178	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.910013567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766635	2539495	2543110	276058	279542	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC56E4.06c	ptc1	ggt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.249874429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766636	2539495	2540663	276058	277188	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC56F2.06	ptc1	mug147	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.495248819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766637	2539495	2540263	276058	276794	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC32H8.02c	ptc1	nep2	-	mug120|pi021|SPACTOKYO_453.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.985265263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766638	2539495	2541311	276058	277823	SPCC4F11.02	SPBP8B7.09c	ptc1	los1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.190399013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766639	2539495	2539648	276058	276203	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC1198.08	ptc1	SPBC1198.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.297163316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766640	2539495	2539961	276058	276505	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC1198.09	ptc1	ubc16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.118033097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766641	2539495	2539244	276058	275814	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC1672.06c	ptc1	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643156508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766642	2539495	2543551	276058	279968	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC4G8.06c	ptc1	trm12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.35270246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766643	2539495	2542082	276058	278559	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC29B12.10c	ptc1	pgt1	-	opt1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.07432359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766644	2539495	2540714	276058	277237	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC19C2.04c	ptc1	ubp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.49984609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766645	2539495	2541416	276058	277923	SPCC4F11.02	SPBCPT2R1.01c	ptc1	SPBCPT2R1.01c	-	SPBPB2B2.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.376570991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766646	2539495	2538906	276058	275483	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC1259.03	ptc1	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.910421543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766647	2539495	2542213	276058	278687	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC3G6.13c	ptc1	rpl4101	-	rpl41-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.924092419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766648	2539495	2542791	276058	279240	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC167.04	ptc1	pam17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.820331027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766649	2539495	2540825	276058	277343	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC428.08c	ptc1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57279997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766650	2539495	3361543	276058	280619	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC9.13c	ptc1	cwf16	-	SPAPJ735.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.201557355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766651	2539495	2541844	276058	278335	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC22A12.17c	ptc1	SPAC22A12.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.093932525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766652	2539495	2540303	276058	276833	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC354.01	ptc1	gtp1	-	SPBC649.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.354836219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766653	2539495	2543573	276058	279988	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC869.11	ptc1	cat1	-	SPAC922.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.215286427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766654	2539495	2541384	276058	277895	SPCC4F11.02	SPBP8B7.26	ptc1	SPBP8B7.26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508086529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766655	2539495	2539098	276058	275670	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC24B10.18	ptc1	SPCC24B10.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.506963432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766656	2539495	2539237	276058	275807	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC24B10.13	ptc1	skb5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.167217607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766657	2539495	2538876	276058	275455	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC4B3.02c	ptc1	SPCC4B3.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.003533116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766658	2539495	2539051	276058	275624	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC1183.11	ptc1	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.126317696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766659	2539495	2542950	276058	279390	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC12B10.03	ptc1	bun62	-	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.50733635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766660	2539495	2541664	276058	278160	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC2H10.01	ptc1	SPAC2H10.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576897418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766661	2539495	2540312	276058	276842	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC31F10.08	ptc1	mde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769513503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766662	2539495	2540931	276058	277447	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC365.07c	ptc1	SPBC365.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.554942101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766663	2539495	2541353	276058	277864	SPCC4F11.02	SPBP35G2.11c	ptc1	SPBP35G2.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.482921512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766664	2539495	2542484	276058	278944	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC1A6.07	ptc1	sle1	-	SPAC1A6.07|seg1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.962818641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766665	2539495	2541249	276058	277763	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC947.01	ptc1	alf1	-	SPBC947.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.412027792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766666	2539495	2540903	276058	277419	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC530.05	ptc1	prt1	-	SPBC530.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.375620979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766667	2539495	2541615	276058	278112	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC27D7.11c	ptc1	SPAC27D7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.194775714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766668	2539495	2540241	276058	276773	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC32H8.11	ptc1	mei4	-	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576807498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766669	2539495	2543144	276058	279576	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC3F10.05c	ptc1	mug113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.910607924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766670	2539495	2541982	276058	278467	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC23A1.06c	ptc1	cmk2	-	mkp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.058298621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766671	2539495	2539845	276058	276393	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC12C2.02c	ptc1	ste20	-	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.982650392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766672	2539495	2541160	276058	277675	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC725.09c	ptc1	hob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.295907869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766673	2539495	2540429	276058	276957	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC29A10.07	ptc1	pom152	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571787583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766674	2539495	3361491	276058	280567	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC1805.08	ptc1	dlc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384161083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766675	2539495	2540338	276058	276867	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC2G2.13c	ptc1	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.812691068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766676	2539495	2542990	276058	279428	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC11D3.16c	ptc1	SPAC11D3.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.557502675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766677	2539495	2541192	276058	277706	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC83.17	ptc1	SPBC83.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.847694511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766678	2539495	2542464	276058	278925	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC1A6.09c	ptc1	lag1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.234071065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766679	2539495	2540363	276058	276892	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC2F12.09c	ptc1	atf21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.389268088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766680	2539495	2540886	276058	277403	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC4F6.10	ptc1	vps901	-	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.527471579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766681	2539495	2539219	276058	275789	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC1795.01c	ptc1	mad3	-	SPCC895.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.67335722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766682	2539495	2542989	276058	279427	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC11E3.13c	ptc1	gas5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.382127128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766683	2539495	2543531	276058	279949	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC926.06c	ptc1	SPAC926.06c	-	lrr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.141604619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766684	2539495	2539484	276058	276047	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC594.04c	ptc1	SPCC594.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.401979934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766685	2539495	2542921	276058	279362	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC1093.01	ptc1	ppr5	-	SPAC12B10.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.762712951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766686	2539495	2542522	276058	278980	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC19A8.03	ptc1	ymr1	-	SPAC19A8.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.490820438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766687	2539495	2541096	276058	277611	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC725.10	ptc1	SPBC725.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516633965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766688	2539495	2543667	276058	280081	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC4H3.02c	ptc1	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.504671626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766689	2539495	2541183	276058	277697	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC725.14	ptc1	arg6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.210530274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766690	2539495	2539603	276058	276161	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC1289.06c	ptc1	ppr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.505579845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766691	2539495	2543346	276058	279768	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC688.14	ptc1	set13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.00185866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766692	2539495	2542357	276058	278822	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC1782.07	ptc1	qcr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.683897062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766693	2539495	2542651	276058	279105	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC24C9.12c	ptc1	SPAC24C9.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.195898769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766694	2539495	2543643	276058	280057	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC3G9.07c	ptc1	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.98787885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766695	2539495	2543250	276058	279678	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC3G9.15c	ptc1	fcf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.098805585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766696	2539495	2538852	276058	275433	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC4E9.01c	ptc1	rec11	-	SPCC550.16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.908496537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766697	2539495	2539293	276058	275861	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC553.08c	ptc1	ria1	-	SPCC553.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.095735551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766698	2539495	2543396	276058	279818	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC4D7.11	ptc1	dsc4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508455891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766699	2539495	2541187	276058	277701	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC776.14	ptc1	plh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.325410512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766700	2539495	2542861	276058	279307	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC13G7.13c	ptc1	msa1	-	SPAC6C3.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.829972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766701	2539495	3361269	276058	280345	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC31A8.01c	ptc1	rtn1	-	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.559457509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766702	2539495	2542126	276058	278602	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC1B3.05	ptc1	not3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928529984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766703	2539495	2542710	276058	279163	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC750.08c	ptc1	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.507663339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766704	2539495	2543244	276058	279672	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC6B12.06c	ptc1	rrg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.068176326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766705	2539495	2541828	276058	278319	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC22H12.05c	ptc1	fsc1	-	SPAC22H12.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391561453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766706	2539495	2540256	276058	276787	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC32F12.12c	ptc1	SPBC32F12.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.689621825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766707	2539495	2542946	276058	279386	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC6F12.03c	ptc1	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.329137351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766708	2539495	2540751	276058	277273	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC20F10.10	ptc1	psl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.741131098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766709	2539495	2540290	276058	276821	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC29A3.02c	ptc1	his7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.508384957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766710	2539495	2540371	276058	276900	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC36.11	ptc1	SPBC36.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.408097611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766711	2539495	2542933	276058	279374	SPCC4F11.02	SPAPYUG7.06	ptc1	sdu1	-	mug67|hag1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.129670306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766712	2539495	2539815	276058	276365	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC1105.02c	ptc1	lys4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571880792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766713	2539495	2538837	276058	275418	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC4B3.03c	ptc1	SPCC4B3.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.805499406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766714	2539495	3361569	276058	280645	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC186.04c	ptc1	SPAC186.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.46722083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766715	2539495	2538849	276058	275430	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC330.14c	ptc1	rpl2402	-	rpl24-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.701578978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766716	2539495	2539974	276058	276518	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC32H8.07	ptc1	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0587623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766717	2539495	2539224	276058	275794	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC16A11.01	ptc1	SPCC16A11.01	-	SPCC63.15	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.970712042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766718	2539495	2541720	276058	278214	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC23H3.13c	ptc1	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.19744105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766719	2539495	2542575	276058	279031	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC31G5.10	ptc1	eta2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574229264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766720	2539495	2541903	276058	278393	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC22F8.05	ptc1	SPAC22F8.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.154665606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766721	2539495	2543378	276058	279800	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC3H8.07c	ptc1	pac10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636621552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766722	2539495	2538935	276058	275511	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC1682.11c	ptc1	ctl1	-	SPCC1682.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63686424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766723	2539495	2543301	276058	279726	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC977.17	ptc1	SPAC977.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.046295492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766724	2539495	2543683	276058	280097	SPCC4F11.02	SPAPB1E7.04c	ptc1	SPAPB1E7.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.249616835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766725	2539495	2542813	276058	279260	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC29B12.11c	ptc1	SPAC29B12.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.627805672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766726	2539495	2539715	276058	276268	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC1778.09	ptc1	SPBC1778.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.405092353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766727	2539495	2543561	276058	279977	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC922.04	ptc1	SPAC922.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.067622945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766728	2539495	2538708	276058	275292	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC594.01	ptc1	SPCC594.01	-	SPCC736.16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.113084892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766729	2539495	2542520	276058	278978	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC20G8.09c	ptc1	nat10	-	SPAC20G8.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391697931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766730	2539495	2541536	276058	278036	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC1071.02	ptc1	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.622775668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766731	2539495	2540201	276058	276734	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC13A2.04c	ptc1	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.269429942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766732	2539495	2539402	276058	275967	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC613.03	ptc1	SPCC613.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.27222846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766733	2539495	2541410	276058	277918	SPCC4F11.02	SPBPB2B2.17c	ptc1	SPBPB2B2.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.63099922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766734	2539495	2542597	276058	279051	SPCC4F11.02	SPAP8A3.07c	ptc1	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.808282386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766735	2539495	2538828	276058	275409	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC1020.05	ptc1	SPCC1020.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.754305661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766736	2539495	2540184	276058	276717	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC106.12c	ptc1	SPBC106.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.535895375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766737	2539495	2542773	276058	279222	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC16.01	ptc1	rho2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.436939367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766738	2539495	2541296	276058	277808	SPCC4F11.02	SPBP8B7.06	ptc1	rpp201	-	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.066371319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766739	2539495	3361030	276058	280106	SPCC4F11.02	SPCP20C8.03	ptc1	SPCP20C8.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.064017643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766740	2539495	2538690	276058	275275	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC1393.05	ptc1	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714210755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766741	2539495	2542060	276058	278538	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC23C11.14	ptc1	zhf1	-	zhf	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.916923496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766742	2539495	2540357	276058	276886	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC2F12.05c	ptc1	SPBC2F12.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.597378591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766743	2539495	2542255	276058	278725	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC57A7.08	ptc1	pzh1	-	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.43384738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766744	2539495	2539993	276058	276537	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC1105.05	ptc1	exg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.759089133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766745	2539495	2541378	276058	277889	SPCC4F11.02	SPBP8B7.21	ptc1	ubp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.911685433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766746	2539495	2542781	276058	279230	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC57A10.12c	ptc1	ura3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.619088956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766747	2539495	2539519	276058	276081	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC364.05	ptc1	vps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.625656127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766748	2539495	2542602	276058	279056	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC186.09	ptc1	SPAC186.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.990327733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766749	2539495	2541793	276058	278284	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC22H10.02	ptc1	SPAC22H10.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.766933082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766750	2539495	2542869	276058	279314	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC140.02	ptc1	gar2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38951185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766751	2539495	2542875	276058	279320	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC13G7.02c	ptc1	ssa1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.297085964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766752	2539495	2539538	276058	276100	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC364.06	ptc1	nap1	-	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390833318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766753	2539495	2539877	276058	276423	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC16G5.07c	ptc1	SPBC16G5.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.992925832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766754	2539495	2541525	276058	278025	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC27D7.02c	ptc1	SPAC27D7.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.338128259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766755	2539495	2539490	276058	276053	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC364.07	ptc1	ser3	-	SPCC364.07|SPCC4G3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.122232082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766756	2539495	2543113	276058	279545	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC3F10.07c	ptc1	erf4	-	mug91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.772753555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766757	2539495	2542198	276058	278673	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC6F12.09	ptc1	rdp1	-	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.416414107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766758	2539495	2540706	276058	277229	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC19C7.12c	ptc1	omh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634113618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766759	2539495	2543332	276058	279755	SPCC4F11.02	SPAPB8E5.04c	ptc1	SPAPB8E5.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.574094955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766760	2539495	2541156	276058	277671	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC685.07c	ptc1	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.415253154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766761	2539495	2543051	276058	279486	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC1071.08	ptc1	rpp203	-	rla6|rpp2-3|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.816036087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766762	2539495	2542286	276058	278754	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC1786.01c	ptc1	ptl2	-	SPAC1786.01c|SPAC31G5.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.067098057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766763	2539495	2540849	276058	277366	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC428.11	ptc1	met17	-	SPBC428.11|cys2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.908775755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766764	2539495	2543071	276058	279504	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC3C7.06c	ptc1	pit1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.318337726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766765	2539495	2542847	276058	279293	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC1420.01c	ptc1	SPAC1420.01c	-	SPAC56E4.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.494580096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766766	2539495	2543191	276058	279620	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC3C7.05c	ptc1	mug191	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.532675662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766767	2539495	2541909	276058	278399	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC227.01c	ptc1	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.697187565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766768	2539495	2540779	276058	277298	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC19F8.06c	ptc1	meu22	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.053438969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766769	2539495	5802917	276058	858055	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC17A2.14	ptc1	SPAC17A2.14	-	SPAC17G6.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512438799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766770	2539495	2539925	276058	276469	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC16H5.13	ptc1	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.497355334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766771	2539495	2542515	276058	278973	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC1952.09c	ptc1	SPAC1952.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.481378211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766772	2539495	2540648	276058	277173	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC1921.05	ptc1	ape2	-	ape1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582982719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766773	2539495	2540800	276058	277319	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC409.20c	ptc1	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.682774306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766774	2539495	2540152	276058	276688	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC12C2.03c	ptc1	SPBC12C2.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.596949065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766775	2539495	2538717	276058	275301	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC1235.02	ptc1	bio2	-	SPCC320.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.606485748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766776	2539495	2540998	276058	277514	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC3D6.05	ptc1	ptp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.83997286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766777	2539495	2542940	276058	279381	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC31A2.12	ptc1	SPAC31A2.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321159039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766778	2539495	2543130	276058	279562	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC869.05c	ptc1	SPAC869.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641267209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766779	2539495	2538714	276058	275298	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC330.11	ptc1	btb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.694553096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766780	2539495	2541100	276058	277615	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC651.04	ptc1	SPBC651.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.932041359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766781	2539495	2539239	276058	275809	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC1020.10	ptc1	oca2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.37829619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766782	2539495	2541425	276058	277930	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC2C4.17c	ptc1	msy2	-	SPAC2C4.17c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.438290833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766783	2539495	2540725	276058	277248	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC215.14c	ptc1	vps20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.029560145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766784	2539495	2540115	276058	276652	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC1778.02	ptc1	rap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.989431464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766785	2539495	2541367	276058	277878	SPCC4F11.02	SPBP8B7.13	ptc1	vac7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.0997665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766786	2539495	2539816	276058	276366	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC12C2.04	ptc1	SPBC12C2.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.225844787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766787	2539495	2541531	276058	278031	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC25A8.01c	ptc1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.231386198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766788	2539495	2540421	276058	276949	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC2D10.19c	ptc1	alb1	-	SPBC2D10.19c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323014791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766789	2539495	2539013	276058	275586	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC364.03	ptc1	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.194140888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766790	2539495	2540304	276058	276834	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC354.13	ptc1	rga6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.207356559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766791	2539495	2541678	276058	278174	SPCC4F11.02	SPAP7G5.05	ptc1	rpl1002	-	rpl10|rpl10-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439999338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766792	2539495	2541948	276058	278435	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC222.13c	ptc1	SPAC222.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932234072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766793	2539495	2540164	276058	276699	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC1683.03c	ptc1	SPBC1683.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.188569165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766794	2539495	2542042	276058	278523	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC23A1.14c	ptc1	SPAC23A1.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.354423425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766795	2539495	2541229	276058	277743	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC839.05c	ptc1	rps1701	-	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992385448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766796	2539495	2542076	276058	278553	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC29A4.19c	ptc1	cta5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326233079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766797	2539495	2542051	276058	278530	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC23C11.06c	ptc1	SPAC23C11.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.998071717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766798	2539495	2540677	276058	277202	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC21B10.03c	ptc1	ath1	-	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.62732136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766799	2539495	2542918	276058	279359	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC12G12.12	ptc1	SPAC12G12.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.622905079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766800	2539495	2543091	276058	279524	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC12G12.15	ptc1	sif3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.053359358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766801	2539495	2542222	276058	278695	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC31G5.18c	ptc1	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.12345379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766802	2539495	2543427	276058	279847	SPCC4F11.02	SPAPB1A10.15	ptc1	arv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.129871716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766803	2539495	2541404	276058	277913	SPCC4F11.02	SPBPB2B2.18	ptc1	SPBPB2B2.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.698785074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766804	2539495	2541380	276058	277891	SPCC4F11.02	SPBPB2B2.13	ptc1	gal1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.112503709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766805	2539495	2540182	276058	276715	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC16G5.06	ptc1	SPBC16G5.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.509523322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766806	2539495	2540202	276058	276735	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC16G5.09	ptc1	SPBC16G5.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.914063579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766807	2539495	2543183	276058	279612	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC3A12.06c	ptc1	SPAC3A12.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.680000068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766808	2539495	2538795	276058	275376	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC1884.01	ptc1	SPCC1884.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.825742338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766809	2539495	2541744	276058	278238	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC23A1.02c	ptc1	SPAC23A1.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.842434128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766810	2539495	2541115	276058	277630	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC660.07	ptc1	ntp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.564186172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766811	2539495	2542386	276058	278850	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC1805.01c	ptc1	ppk6	-	SPAPJ736.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.185781637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766812	2539495	2541244	276058	277758	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC8D2.02c	ptc1	vps68	-	SPBC8D2.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323011829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766813	2539495	2539736	276058	276288	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC12C2.12c	ptc1	glo1	-	SPBC21D10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.671713494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766814	2539495	2540489	276058	277017	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC25H2.03	ptc1	SPBC25H2.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.570858769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766815	2539495	2540333	276058	276863	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC21B10.07	ptc1	SPBC21B10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.053524379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766816	2539495	2539170	276058	275741	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC306.02c	ptc1	SPCC306.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.822626904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766817	2539495	2539205	276058	275775	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC4B3.15	ptc1	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.005799326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766818	2539495	2542904	276058	279348	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC144.11	ptc1	rps1102	-	rps11|rps11-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.152825534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766819	2539495	2540278	276058	276809	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC1A4.04	ptc1	SPBC1A4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.773058148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766820	2539495	2540380	276058	276909	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC1A4.05	ptc1	blt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.982273008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766821	2539495	2543056	276058	279490	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC3A11.04	ptc1	SPAC3A11.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.629436659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766822	2539495	2539920	276058	276464	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC119.08	ptc1	pmk1	-	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.61161986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766823	2539495	2543525	276058	279943	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC4A8.14	ptc1	SPAC4A8.14	-	prs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.688259176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766824	2539495	2541941	276058	278428	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC20H4.03c	ptc1	tfs1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509610568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766825	2539495	2543337	276058	279760	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC959.08	ptc1	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.126834876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766826	2539495	2543486	276058	279906	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC959.07	ptc1	rps403	-	rps4|rps4-3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.24084017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766827	2539495	3361360	276058	280436	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC1652.01	ptc1	SPBC1652.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.638862297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766828	2539495	2539169	276058	275740	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC1235.11	ptc1	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.08742681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766829	2539495	2541238	276058	277752	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC8E4.05c	ptc1	SPBC8E4.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.299511914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766830	2539495	3361165	276058	280241	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC1348.12	ptc1	SPBC1348.12	-	SPAC1348.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.696043414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766831	2539495	2543220	276058	279648	SPCC4F11.02	SPAPB21F2.02	ptc1	SPAPB21F2.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.877022451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766832	2539495	2543400	276058	279822	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC3G9.11c	ptc1	SPAC3G9.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.014917252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766833	2539495	2541357	276058	277868	SPCC4F11.02	SPBPB7E8.01	ptc1	SPBPB7E8.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.15656456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766834	2539495	2543384	276058	279806	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC637.06	ptc1	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.546465475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766835	2539495	2543387	276058	279809	SPCC4F11.02	SPAPB1E7.02c	ptc1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.31699099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766836	2539495	2539128	276058	275700	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC1682.06	ptc1	SPCC1682.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.547075696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766837	2539495	2543081	276058	279514	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC30C2.05	ptc1	erv14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.503553005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766838	2539495	2540828	276058	277346	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC4B4.06	ptc1	vps25	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.995122577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766839	2539495	2542175	276058	278650	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC1F3.02c	ptc1	mkh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513516223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766840	2539495	3361517	276058	280593	SPCC4F11.02	SPAP11E10.02c	ptc1	mam3	-	SPAPB1A10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.576913244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766841	2539495	2542566	276058	279022	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC8C9.12c	ptc1	SPAC8C9.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582351678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766842	2539495	2539768	276058	276319	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC1703.09	ptc1	SPBC1703.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567844759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766843	2539495	2541867	276058	278357	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC22E12.14c	ptc1	sck2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510919129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766844	2539495	2539588	276058	276146	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC962.04	ptc1	rps1201	-	rps12|rps12-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.991299154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766845	2539495	2541478	276058	277980	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC2F7.17	ptc1	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.124010176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766846	2539495	2543372	276058	279794	SPCC4F11.02	SPAPB1A10.09	ptc1	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.964778627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766847	2539495	2543374	276058	279796	SPCC4F11.02	SPAPB1A10.08	ptc1	SPAPB1A10.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.810008373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766848	2539495	2543333	276058	279756	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC694.02	ptc1	SPAC694.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.125428621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766849	2539495	2543090	276058	279523	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC1348.01	ptc1	SPBC1348.01	-	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.560500755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766850	2539495	3361295	276058	280371	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC1921.01c	ptc1	rpl35b	-	rpl37|rpl37-1|rpl3701|SPBC29C10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.914447737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766851	2539495	2542943	276058	279384	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC1348.03	ptc1	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.697987475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766852	2539495	2540938	276058	277454	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC365.14c	ptc1	uge1	-	gal10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.584806821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766853	2539495	2542561	276058	279017	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC31G5.17c	ptc1	rps1001	-	rps10-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.160042416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766854	2539495	2541576	276058	278073	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC1348.02	ptc1	SPBC1348.02	-	SPAC1348.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.293644077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766855	2539495	2542594	276058	279048	SPCC4F11.02	SPACUNK4.10	ptc1	SPACUNK4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.058550661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766856	2539495	2543646	276058	280060	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC821.07c	ptc1	moc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.062290563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766857	2539495	2542617	276058	279071	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC13A11.01c	ptc1	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.901131624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766858	2539495	2541062	276058	277577	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC660.11	ptc1	tcg1	-	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.687183924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766859	2539495	2541875	276058	278365	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC22F3.06c	ptc1	lon1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147829955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766860	2539495	2540787	276058	277306	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC1921.07c	ptc1	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.748868829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766861	2539495	2540798	276058	277317	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC19C7.01	ptc1	mni1	-	SPBC32F12.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38139355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766862	2539495	2540649	276058	277174	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC19F8.08	ptc1	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.689652855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766863	2541804	2538939	278295	275514	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC1672.04c	prw1	SPCC1672.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.769983464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766864	2541804	2542207	278295	278682	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC17H9.10c	prw1	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.332569986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766865	2541804	2539147	278295	275719	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC622.12c	prw1	gdh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.742572819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766866	2541804	2543565	278295	279981	SPAC29A4.18	SPAPB24D3.04c	prw1	mag1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.610819049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766867	2541804	2542895	278295	279339	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC13G6.10c	prw1	asl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.978355112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766868	2541804	2541902	278295	278392	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC27E2.07	prw1	pvg2	-	mug53	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.491555613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766869	2541804	2538721	278295	275305	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC1494.10	prw1	adn3	-	SPCC70.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.412509233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766870	2541804	2539095	278295	275667	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC584.13	prw1	SPCC584.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038287856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766871	2541804	2540060	278295	276598	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC106.01	prw1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.059185111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766872	2541804	2540942	278295	277458	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC3H7.14	prw1	mug176	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.071225142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766873	2541804	2541763	278295	278257	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC22F3.11c	prw1	snu23	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.322890337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766874	2541804	2538961	278295	275535	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC285.14	prw1	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391368716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766875	2541804	2542577	278295	279033	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC19G12.15c	prw1	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.122381221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766876	2541804	2540105	278295	276642	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC106.04	prw1	ada1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329032628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766877	2541804	2540913	278295	277429	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC56F2.08c	prw1	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.558746896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766878	2541804	2539452	278295	276015	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC70.03c	prw1	SPCC70.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.007509452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766879	2541804	2540026	278295	276570	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC16D10.08c	prw1	hsp104	-	SPBC16D10.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.558891643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766880	2541804	2539749	278295	276301	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC16A3.13	prw1	meu7	-	aah4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.33540887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766881	2541804	2543414	278295	279836	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC630.10	prw1	SPAC630.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.668441492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766882	2541804	2542671	278295	279124	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC824.09c	prw1	SPAC824.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.054056847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766883	2541804	2540131	278295	276668	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC1778.05c	prw1	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.772273587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766884	2541804	2542787	278295	279236	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC9G1.08c	prw1	SPAC9G1.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.914125494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766885	2541804	2542293	278295	278761	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC17G8.14c	prw1	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.725286542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766886	2541804	2540863	278295	277380	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC56F2.03	prw1	SPBC56F2.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.439255825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766887	2541804	2540528	278295	277056	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC18H10.04c	prw1	sce3	-	tif48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867109326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766888	2541804	2539035	278295	275608	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC794.09c	prw1	tef101	-	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.538026429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766889	2541804	2540198	278295	276731	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC1709.04c	prw1	cyp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.187371812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766890	2541804	2542237	278295	278709	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC19E9.02	prw1	fin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.241608355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766891	2541804	2539930	278295	276474	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC1198.11c	prw1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.124138489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766892	2541804	2539876	278295	276422	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC1734.07c	prw1	trs8502	-	SPBC1734.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199013885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766893	2541804	2540068	278295	276606	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC1734.12c	prw1	alg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.685243304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766894	2541804	2542443	278295	278905	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC17G6.13	prw1	slt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.498753261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766895	2541804	2540410	278295	276938	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC2D10.04	prw1	SPBC2D10.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044186351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766896	2541804	2540296	278295	276827	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC2D10.05	prw1	exg3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816550782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766897	2541804	2542224	278295	278697	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC19G12.03	prw1	cda1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.337287843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766898	2541804	2541856	278295	278347	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC23H3.08c	prw1	bub3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.910245718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766899	2541804	2540161	278295	276696	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC13E7.03c	prw1	SPBC13E7.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328313404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766900	2541804	2542502	278295	278960	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC139.06	prw1	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.412453285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766901	2541804	2541345	278295	277856	SPAC29A4.18	SPBP35G2.07	prw1	ilv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.693819769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766902	2541804	2542963	278295	279403	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC1071.03c	prw1	sil1	-	SPAC1071.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.210233745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766903	2541804	2543432	278295	279852	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC4G8.05	prw1	ppk14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.710594492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766904	2541804	2540347	278295	276876	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC30B4.08	prw1	eri1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.23144509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766905	2541804	2541374	278295	277885	SPAC29A4.18	SPBPB10D8.06c	prw1	SPBPB10D8.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.508078548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766906	2541804	2543434	278295	279854	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC8F11.02c	prw1	dph3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.233216932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766907	2541804	2539201	278295	275772	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC188.09c	prw1	pfl4	-	SPCC188.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929525508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766908	2541804	2541771	278295	278265	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC23H3.06	prw1	apl6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.562075493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766909	2541804	2538922	278295	275499	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC16C4.10	prw1	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.989707383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766910	2541804	2542103	278295	278579	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC31G5.11	prw1	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.565091936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766911	2541804	2543270	278295	279698	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC1002.02	prw1	pom34	-	mug31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.386702463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766912	2541804	2540717	278295	277240	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC577.12	prw1	dph6	-	mug71	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093271583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766913	2541804	2541082	278295	277597	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC577.11	prw1	SPBC577.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043323224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766914	2541804	2540579	278295	277105	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC28E12.02	prw1	SPBC28E12.02	-	SPBC9B6.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.064548011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766915	2541804	2539309	278295	275876	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC4G3.19	prw1	alp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.381042664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766916	2541804	2540535	278295	277062	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC215.01	prw1	SPBC215.01	-	SPBC3B9.20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.878676604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766917	2541804	2543320	278295	279744	SPAC29A4.18	SPAPJ695.01c	prw1	SPAPJ695.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.859601378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766918	2541804	2541286	278295	277799	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC9B6.11c	prw1	SPBC9B6.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.210307362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766919	2541804	2541361	278295	277872	SPAC29A4.18	SPBP8B7.10c	prw1	utp16	-	SPBP8B7.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.457691996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766920	2541804	2540999	278295	277515	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC4B4.04	prw1	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.603415013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766921	2541804	2539332	278295	275898	SPAC29A4.18	SPCPB1C11.01	prw1	amt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.464779869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766922	2541804	2541086	278295	277601	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC685.04c	prw1	aps2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.126895652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766923	2541804	2540975	278295	277491	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC354.12	prw1	gpd3	-	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.883748115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766924	2541804	2539420	278295	275985	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC970.07c	prw1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391391467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766925	2541804	2541200	278295	277714	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC8D2.03c	prw1	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704990379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766926	2541804	2540560	278295	277087	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC2D10.14c	prw1	myo51	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.617406549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766927	2541804	2542468	278295	278929	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC1D4.09c	prw1	rtf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.882601326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766928	2541804	2541208	278295	277722	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC887.04c	prw1	lub1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.793830922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766929	2541804	2541012	278295	277527	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC3H7.12	prw1	rav2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.063835738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766930	2541804	2540979	278295	277495	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC3H7.10	prw1	elp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.472416536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766931	2541804	2539735	278295	276287	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC1773.04	prw1	SPBC1773.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988259944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766932	2541804	2542273	278295	278742	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC17H9.13c	prw1	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876555474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766933	2541804	2541092	278295	277607	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC660.12c	prw1	egt2	-	SPBC660.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.442472804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766934	2541804	2541058	278295	277573	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC3H7.09	prw1	erf2	-	mug142	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.804228261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766935	2541804	2540251	278295	276783	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC336.05c	prw1	SPBC336.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926935571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766936	2541804	2542714	278295	279167	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC5H10.06c	prw1	adh4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.04267892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766937	2541804	2539463	278295	276026	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC550.11	prw1	SPCC550.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317408378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766938	2541804	2543230	278295	279658	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC823.13c	prw1	SPAC823.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.742836166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766939	2541804	2543260	278295	279688	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC1002.17c	prw1	urg2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.869786746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766940	2541804	2542724	278295	279175	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC767.01c	prw1	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.382622221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766941	2541804	2539935	278295	276479	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC13G1.04c	prw1	abh1	-	SPBC13G1.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817501444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766942	2541804	2539434	278295	275997	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC757.09c	prw1	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.644825425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766943	2541804	2540692	278295	277217	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC800.07c	prw1	tsf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.514625233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766944	2541804	2541026	278295	277541	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC337.09	prw1	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.152777393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766945	2541804	2540220	278295	276753	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC337.03	prw1	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.614256341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766946	2541804	3361381	278295	280457	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC12G12.01c	prw1	SPAC12G12.01c	-	SPAC630.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.977984447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766947	2541804	2543542	278295	279959	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC823.09c	prw1	SPAC823.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.180455162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766948	2541804	2539575	278295	276135	SPAC29A4.18	SPCP20C8.02c	prw1	SPCP20C8.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325224382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766949	2541804	2540929	278295	277445	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC354.03	prw1	swd3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819692876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766950	2541804	2541119	278295	277634	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC651.11c	prw1	apm3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.547940713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766951	2541804	2543636	278295	280050	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC3H8.08c	prw1	SPAC3H8.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.81322885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766952	2541804	2539988	278295	276532	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC1271.05c	prw1	SPBC1271.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867256047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766953	2541804	2540463	278295	276991	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC2F12.15c	prw1	pfa3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.618391161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766954	2541804	2539063	278295	275635	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC126.12	prw1	SPCC126.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.868234105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766955	2541804	2540993	278295	277509	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC342.01c	prw1	alg6	-	SPBC3F6.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.407220671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766956	2541804	2543029	278295	279465	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC11G7.01	prw1	SPAC11G7.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391087455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766957	2541804	2540425	278295	276953	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC27.06c	prw1	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515926183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766958	2541804	2542135	278295	278611	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC13A11.04c	prw1	ubp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.620102083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766959	2541804	2541424	278295	277929	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC23G3.04	prw1	ies4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.91912184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766960	2541804	2540295	278295	276826	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC3B8.05	prw1	SPBC3B8.05	-	dph1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.918528146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766961	2541804	2542277	278295	278746	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC17A5.02c	prw1	dbr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.66210347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766962	2541804	2539175	278295	275746	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC16C4.01	prw1	sif2	-	SPCC5E4.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.960603841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766963	2541804	2539822	278295	276372	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC16G5.02c	prw1	SPBC16G5.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509873519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766964	2541804	2542649	278295	279103	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC24C9.14	prw1	otu1	-	mug141	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817487067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766965	2541804	2539129	278295	275701	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC338.14	prw1	ado1	-	SPCC338.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.062516707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766966	2541804	2542246	278295	278716	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC17H9.12c	prw1	SPAC17H9.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.263443171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766967	2541804	2540540	278295	277067	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC23E6.10c	prw1	SPBC23E6.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.022469747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766968	2541804	2539525	278295	276087	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC613.01	prw1	SPCC613.01	-	SPCC757.14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.329971059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766969	2541804	2543641	278295	280055	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC3H5.08c	prw1	SPAC3H5.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.742089086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766970	2541804	2540059	278295	276597	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC1198.01	prw1	fmd2	-	SPBC1198.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992040934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766971	2541804	2543563	278295	279979	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC664.02c	prw1	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.333024239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766972	2541804	2538698	278295	275283	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC1442.02	prw1	SPCC1442.02	-	SPCC1450.18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.228227768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766973	2541804	2541522	278295	278023	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC23E2.01	prw1	fep1	-	gaf2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.464375905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766974	2541804	2543426	278295	279846	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC631.02	prw1	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.018372006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766975	2541804	2541416	278295	277923	SPAC29A4.18	SPBCPT2R1.01c	prw1	SPBCPT2R1.01c	-	SPBPB2B2.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.487427566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766976	2541804	2540883	278295	277400	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC577.06c	prw1	stt4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81557243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766977	2541804	2543078	278295	279511	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC31A2.15c	prw1	dcc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.376456191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766978	2541804	2541663	278295	278159	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC22G7.08	prw1	ppk8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844594461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766979	2541804	2538972	278295	275546	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC1739.15	prw1	wtf21	-	wtf3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.312469898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766980	2541804	2542253	278295	278723	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC17H9.04c	prw1	SPAC17H9.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.204683015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766981	2541804	2539478	278295	276041	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC550.07	prw1	SPCC550.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.508324215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766982	2541804	2541926	278295	278414	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC222.14c	prw1	SPAC222.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.507304732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766983	2541804	2539310	278295	275877	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC285.17	prw1	spp27	-	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.975784597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766984	2541804	2542665	278295	279118	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC10F6.08c	prw1	nht10	-	nht1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.560606419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766985	2541804	2540340	278295	276869	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC2D10.15c	prw1	pth1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.938755361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766986	2541804	2542268	278295	278737	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC17A5.07c	prw1	ulp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776807228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766987	2541804	2542036	278295	278518	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC23A1.19c	prw1	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.138967357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766988	2541804	2542394	278295	278858	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC31G5.12c	prw1	maf1	-	n150	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.823864356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766989	2541804	2538876	278295	275455	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC4B3.02c	prw1	SPCC4B3.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323182993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766990	2541804	2543020	278295	279456	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC10F6.13c	prw1	SPAC10F6.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.810999447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766991	2541804	2542484	278295	278944	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC1A6.07	prw1	sle1	-	SPAC1A6.07|seg1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.380538639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766992	2541804	2542964	278295	279404	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC12G12.07c	prw1	SPAC12G12.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189567762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766993	2541804	2541801	278295	278292	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC2F7.08c	prw1	snf5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.026494483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766994	2541804	2541250	278295	277764	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC8D2.17	prw1	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.809067035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766995	2541804	2541800	278295	278291	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC732.02c	prw1	SPAC732.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.840705866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766996	2541804	2541776	278295	278270	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC23H3.05c	prw1	swd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.516482131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766997	2541804	2540192	278295	276725	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC1215.01	prw1	shy1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983106394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766998	2541804	2543144	278295	279576	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC3F10.05c	prw1	mug113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.501549553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
766999	2541804	2541982	278295	278467	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC23A1.06c	prw1	cmk2	-	mkp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.870119951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767000	2541804	2539340	278295	275906	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC1906.04	prw1	wtf20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934971007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767001	2541804	2540647	278295	277172	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC18H10.07	prw1	SPBC18H10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.905777185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767002	2541804	2542776	278295	279225	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC167.01	prw1	ire1	-	ppk4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867064795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767003	2541804	2541038	278295	277553	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC29A10.01	prw1	ccr1	-	SPBC365.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377875741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767004	2541804	2538811	278295	275392	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC330.03c	prw1	SPCC330.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.518340862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767005	2541804	2540338	278295	276867	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC2G2.13c	prw1	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.354775356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767006	2541804	2542123	278295	278599	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC18G6.15	prw1	mal3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.709313237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767007	2541804	2538706	278295	275290	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC338.08	prw1	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.562474154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767008	2541804	2542544	278295	279001	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC18G6.10	prw1	lem2	-	heh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.492645529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767009	2541804	2540352	278295	276881	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC215.03c	prw1	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.686929775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767010	2541804	2539754	278295	276306	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC16C6.04	prw1	dbl6	-	SPBC16C6.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.264172549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767011	2541804	2539733	278295	276285	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC16E9.12c	prw1	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.839921223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767012	2541804	2540396	278295	276924	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC31F10.12	prw1	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770461583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767013	2541804	2540673	278295	277198	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC1D7.03	prw1	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.646406369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767014	2541804	2542464	278295	278925	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC1A6.09c	prw1	lag1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.10025346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767015	2541804	2540363	278295	276892	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC2F12.09c	prw1	atf21	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.235005217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767016	2541804	2539898	278295	276444	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC12D12.07c	prw1	trx2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.456589575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767017	2541804	2541889	278295	278379	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC2F7.03c	prw1	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.206224966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767018	2541804	2541911	278295	278401	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC212.04c	prw1	SPAC212.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.684688086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767019	2541804	2539219	278295	275789	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC1795.01c	prw1	mad3	-	SPCC895.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.340413644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767020	2541804	2543510	278295	279928	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC30D11.07	prw1	nth1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868852566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767021	2541804	2542168	278295	278643	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC17A5.16	prw1	ftp105	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.312988474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767022	2541804	2539371	278295	275937	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC18B5.06	prw1	dom34	-	SPCC18B5.06|erf1|sup45	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866193505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767023	2541804	2542235	278295	278707	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC18G6.05c	prw1	SPAC18G6.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.984580599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767024	2541804	2539999	278295	276543	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC1734.15	prw1	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.714817886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767025	2541804	2542522	278295	278980	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC19A8.03	prw1	ymr1	-	SPAC19A8.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.254401375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767026	2541804	2543358	278295	279780	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC688.10	prw1	rev3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377511918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767027	2541804	2543245	278295	279673	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC56F8.06c	prw1	alg10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.489034712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767028	2541804	2539857	278295	276404	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC1604.20c	prw1	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.003447239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767029	2541804	2543643	278295	280057	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC3G9.07c	prw1	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.647964143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767030	2541804	2540831	278295	277349	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC428.02c	prw1	eca39	-	SPBC582.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.867470623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767031	2541804	2542193	278295	278668	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC9G1.11c	prw1	spn4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.350327842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767032	2541804	2540086	278295	276624	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC16H5.12c	prw1	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262606169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767033	2541804	2541739	278295	278233	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC2G11.10c	prw1	SPAC2G11.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.698383406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767034	2541804	2543250	278295	279678	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC3G9.15c	prw1	fcf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.064264869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767035	2541804	2538852	278295	275433	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC4E9.01c	prw1	rec11	-	SPCC550.16c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038861587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767036	2541804	2541351	278295	277862	SPAC29A4.18	SPBP4H10.14c	prw1	SPBP4H10.14c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.46048531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767037	2541804	2540326	278295	276856	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC2G5.06c	prw1	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851328507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767038	2541804	2539995	278295	276539	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC1105.09	prw1	ubc15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992672673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767039	2541804	2542526	278295	278984	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC57A7.13	prw1	SPAC57A7.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.500902623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767040	2541804	2538769	278295	275352	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC126.04c	prw1	sgf73	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.613648297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767041	2541804	2539667	278295	276222	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC13G1.08c	prw1	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05699131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767042	2541804	2541830	278295	278321	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC5H10.01	prw1	SPAC5H10.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.610516624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767043	2541804	2540194	278295	276727	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC1709.09	prw1	rrf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.897778176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767044	2541804	2540665	278295	277190	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC83.02c	prw1	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.380154113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767045	2541804	2540997	278295	277513	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC3H7.06c	prw1	pof9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.34040471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767046	2541804	2538774	278295	275356	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC162.06c	prw1	SPCC162.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.872092836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767047	2541804	2540256	278295	276787	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC32F12.12c	prw1	SPBC32F12.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925676584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767048	2541804	2542946	278295	279386	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC6F12.03c	prw1	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.060875616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767049	2541804	2540751	278295	277273	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC20F10.10	prw1	psl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32814646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767050	2541804	2539482	278295	276045	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC417.06c	prw1	mug27	-	ppk35|slk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57945327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767051	2541804	2538982	278295	275556	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC1450.12	prw1	SPCC1450.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.275645607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767052	2541804	2539815	278295	276365	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC1105.02c	prw1	lys4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.506670698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767053	2541804	2539974	278295	276518	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC32H8.07	prw1	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.764425592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767054	2541804	2542020	278295	278503	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC5D6.09c	prw1	mug86	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.616425721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767055	2541804	2541720	278295	278214	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC23H3.13c	prw1	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.444929542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767056	2541804	2540107	278295	276644	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC106.08c	prw1	mug2	-	B13958-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1503021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767057	2541804	2542901	278295	279345	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC13F5.07c	prw1	SPAC13F5.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865050203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767058	2541804	2543495	278295	279914	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC513.03	prw1	mfm2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.335886303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767059	2541804	2540836	278295	277354	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC18H10.19	prw1	vps38	-	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.63416649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767060	2541804	2543357	278295	279779	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC688.12c	prw1	SPAC688.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.45851637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767061	2541804	2543378	278295	279800	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC3H8.07c	prw1	pac10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992087055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767062	2541804	2539958	278295	276502	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC1718.07c	prw1	zfs1	-	moc4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.978007503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767063	2541804	2542254	278295	278724	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC30D11.04c	prw1	nup124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.042464984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767064	2541804	2541900	278295	278390	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC23H4.17c	prw1	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.015654866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767065	2541804	2540374	278295	276903	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC31F10.02	prw1	SPBC31F10.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.567054733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767066	2541804	2543301	278295	279726	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC977.17	prw1	SPAC977.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.143265642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767067	2541804	2539408	278295	275973	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC576.12c	prw1	mhf2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866863259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767068	2541804	2542519	278295	278977	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC19G12.08	prw1	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.817319485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767069	2541804	2539027	278295	275600	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC1322.08	prw1	srk1	-	mkp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.062389243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767070	2541804	2542712	278295	279165	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC25B8.17	prw1	SPAC25B8.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579964997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767071	2541804	2539215	278295	275785	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC285.16c	prw1	msh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510215162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767072	2541804	5802861	278295	857999	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC1D4.01	prw1	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.253248944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767073	2541804	2539953	278295	276497	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC1709.11c	prw1	png2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.718275548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767074	2541804	2542919	278295	279360	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC6C3.08	prw1	nas6	-	SPAC6C3.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.491273917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767075	2541804	2540094	278295	276632	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC146.10	prw1	mug57	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.92018956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767076	2541804	2540335	278295	276865	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC30B4.03c	prw1	adn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.564479075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767077	2541804	2542056	278295	278535	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC6G9.14	prw1	SPAC6G9.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.168566012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767078	2541804	2543576	278295	279991	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC4A8.05c	prw1	myp2	-	myo3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.565302712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767079	2541804	2539119	278295	275691	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC1223.13	prw1	cbf12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.549385265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767080	2541804	2538949	278295	275523	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC320.03	prw1	SPCC320.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.282935758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767081	2541804	2540990	278295	277506	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC36B7.06c	prw1	mug20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.559502598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767082	2541804	2541389	278295	277900	SPAC29A4.18	SPBPB2B2.09c	prw1	SPBPB2B2.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.61683369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767083	2541804	2541694	278295	278190	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC1071.04c	prw1	spc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.14379319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767084	2541804	2539348	278295	275914	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC18B5.07c	prw1	nup61	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.910867699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767085	2541804	2539740	278295	276292	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC1685.04	prw1	SPBC1685.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988122417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767086	2541804	2542008	278295	278491	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC2G11.07c	prw1	ptc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.017213774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767087	2541804	2538708	278295	275292	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC594.01	prw1	SPCC594.01	-	SPCC736.16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.708262213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767088	2541804	2542520	278295	278978	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC20G8.09c	prw1	nat10	-	SPAC20G8.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046793755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767089	2541804	2542951	278295	279391	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC1071.05	prw1	SPAC1071.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.043947952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767090	2541804	2541708	278295	278203	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC31A2.02	prw1	trm112	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.09173508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767091	2541804	2541464	278295	277966	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC222.08c	prw1	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.907820075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767092	2541804	2541053	278295	277568	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC56F2.10c	prw1	alg5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.119822168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767093	2541804	2540967	278295	277483	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC36B7.08c	prw1	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.544365632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767094	2541804	2541281	278295	277794	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC902.04	prw1	rmn1	-	SPBC902.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.408201865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767095	2541804	2539847	278295	276395	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC530.14c	prw1	dsk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.920884603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767096	2541804	2539363	278295	275929	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC613.02	prw1	SPCC613.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.254321457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767097	2541804	3361470	278295	280546	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC3G9.01	prw1	nsk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925795725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767098	2541804	2539172	278295	275743	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC1020.08	prw1	SPCC1020.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196675561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767099	2541804	2540844	278295	277361	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC1921.04c	prw1	SPBC1921.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.701062213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767100	2541804	2539059	278295	275632	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC737.06c	prw1	SPCC737.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874442292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767101	2541804	2543331	278295	279754	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC56E4.07	prw1	SPAC56E4.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.456598826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767102	2541804	2540533	278295	277061	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC29A10.16c	prw1	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.558802714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767103	2541804	2539711	278295	276264	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC1683.09c	prw1	frp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262544473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767104	2541804	2540687	278295	277212	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC21D10.08c	prw1	SPBC21D10.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03988113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767105	2541804	2538690	278295	275275	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC1393.05	prw1	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702545416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767106	2541804	2539498	278295	276061	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC645.11c	prw1	mug117	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922127366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767107	2541804	2542060	278295	278538	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC23C11.14	prw1	zhf1	-	zhf	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.99173453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767108	2541804	2538884	278295	275462	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC1393.08	prw1	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.777024848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767109	2541804	2541488	278295	277990	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC227.17c	prw1	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.62648667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767110	2541804	2543477	278295	279897	SPAC29A4.18	SPAPB2B4.04c	prw1	SPAPB2B4.04c	-	pmc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808123155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767111	2541804	2543411	278295	279833	SPAC29A4.18	SPAPB1A10.10c	prw1	ypt71	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.517928384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767112	2541804	2539569	278295	276129	SPAC29A4.18	SPCPB16A4.03c	prw1	ade10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871551768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767113	2541804	2539812	278295	276362	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC1347.02	prw1	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.435872082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767114	2541804	2540193	278295	276726	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC1289.10c	prw1	adn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.089598201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767115	2541804	2539605	278295	276163	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC1105.13c	prw1	SPBC1105.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.773709595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767116	2541804	2542781	278295	279230	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC57A10.12c	prw1	ura3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.463172696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767117	2541804	2543139	278295	279571	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC12G12.03	prw1	cip2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986463207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767118	2541804	2540930	278295	277446	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC354.10	prw1	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.680230255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767119	2541804	2540589	278295	277115	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC20F10.06	prw1	mad2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712148661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767120	2541804	2541742	278295	278236	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC22H10.09	prw1	SPAC22H10.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.613411923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767121	2541804	2541963	278295	278449	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC21E11.04	prw1	aca1	-	ppr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820814001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767122	2541804	2541017	278295	277532	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC36.07	prw1	elp1	-	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.997525811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767123	2541804	2542869	278295	279314	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC140.02	prw1	gar2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86869505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767124	2541804	2541144	278295	277659	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC685.06	prw1	rps001	-	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.25541762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767125	2541804	2541713	278295	278208	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC3A12.12	prw1	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048615999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767126	2541804	2540821	278295	277339	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC800.03	prw1	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.488339283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767127	2541804	2539538	278295	276100	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC364.06	prw1	nap1	-	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.510848142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767128	2541804	2539763	278295	276314	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC1861.05	prw1	SPBC1861.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.337369898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767129	2541804	2540910	278295	277426	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC577.02	prw1	rpl3801	-	rpl38-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.830375717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767130	2541804	2541670	278295	278166	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC24H6.13	prw1	SPAC24H6.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.070536683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767131	2541804	2543113	278295	279545	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC3F10.07c	prw1	erf4	-	mug91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.674261732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767132	2541804	2539686	278295	276241	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC1734.06	prw1	rhp18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.120457618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767133	2541804	2540706	278295	277229	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC19C7.12c	prw1	omh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.128242643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767134	2541804	2541786	278295	278278	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC22F3.08c	prw1	rok1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780188454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767135	2541804	2541798	278295	278289	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC22F3.03c	prw1	rdh54	-	mug34|tid1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864833163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767136	2541804	2539842	278295	276390	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC14C8.15	prw1	SPBC14C8.15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.271304486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767137	2541804	2540442	278295	276970	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC25B2.04c	prw1	mtg1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.259575549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767138	2541804	2542992	278295	279430	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC1071.09c	prw1	SPAC1071.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.90008214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767139	2541804	2541156	278295	277671	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC685.07c	prw1	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.191150745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767140	2541804	2542759	278295	279209	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC9G1.07	prw1	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.271990436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767141	2541804	2539499	278295	276062	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC622.08c	prw1	hta1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.690120782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767142	2541804	2539362	278295	275928	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC18B5.10c	prw1	SPCC18B5.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.615492903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767143	2541804	2540519	278295	277047	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC21C3.14c	prw1	SPBC21C3.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.768724915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767144	2541804	2542327	278295	278793	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC16C9.06c	prw1	upf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.332666418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767145	2541804	2540619	278295	277145	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC25H2.15	prw1	SPBC25H2.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.948792504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767146	2541804	2542767	278295	279217	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC1565.07c	prw1	knd1	-	SPAC1565.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978212183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767147	2541804	2540605	278295	277131	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC21C3.09c	prw1	SPBC21C3.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820318997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767148	2541804	2540061	278295	276599	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC119.12	prw1	rud3	-	SPBC119.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.967828499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767149	2541804	2543670	278295	280084	SPAC29A4.18	SPAPB1E7.06c	prw1	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.632033345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767150	2541804	2541909	278295	278399	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC227.01c	prw1	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.389930936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767151	2541804	2541371	278295	277882	SPAC29A4.18	SPBP4H10.17c	prw1	SPBP4H10.17c	-	mrps2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439689166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767152	2541804	2540498	278295	277026	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC27.02c	prw1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.080284723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767153	2541804	2542401	278295	278865	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC1142.02c	prw1	SPAC1142.02c	-	SPAC17G6.19c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503608409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767154	2541804	2542881	278295	279326	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC13F5.03c	prw1	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.998040227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767155	2541804	2539030	278295	275603	SPAC29A4.18	SPCP1E11.02	prw1	ppk38	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769487398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767156	2541804	2540800	278295	277319	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC409.20c	prw1	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.083647761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767157	2541804	2539533	278295	276095	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC622.01c	prw1	SPCC622.01c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0921907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767158	2541804	2540998	278295	277514	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC3D6.05	prw1	ptp4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.151393741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767159	2541804	2539246	278295	275816	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC18.13	prw1	SPCC18.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.846906203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767160	2541804	2540960	278295	277476	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC3D6.02	prw1	but2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.969126743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767161	2541804	2543136	278295	279568	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC1348.07	prw1	SPBC1348.07	-	SPAC1348.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.338066651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767162	2541804	2542940	278295	279381	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC31A2.12	prw1	SPAC31A2.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.327670062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767163	2541804	2543096	278295	279528	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC977.05c	prw1	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.357865365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767164	2541804	2540531	278295	277059	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC23E6.08	prw1	sat1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.845912559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767165	2541804	2543160	278295	279591	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC31A2.14	prw1	bun107	-	wdr48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.005487296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767166	2541804	2538962	278295	275536	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC965.13	prw1	SPCC965.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.667540539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767167	2541804	2542294	278295	278762	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC1805.09c	prw1	fmt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195241294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767168	2541804	2541103	278295	277618	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC651.06	prw1	mug166	-	csa1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.920217771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767169	2541804	2540935	278295	277451	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC359.04c	prw1	pfl7	-	SPBC359.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.287484056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767170	2541804	2541432	278295	277937	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC1F5.05c	prw1	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819568682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767171	2541804	2543192	278295	279621	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC343.18	prw1	rfp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.661050388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767172	2541804	2540725	278295	277248	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC215.14c	prw1	vps20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.618529315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767173	2541804	2540115	278295	276652	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC1778.02	prw1	rap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.803520411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767174	2541804	2541367	278295	277878	SPAC29A4.18	SPBP8B7.13	prw1	vac7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.917589688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767175	2541804	2538756	278295	275339	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC1795.10c	prw1	SPCC1795.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.258961537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767176	2541804	2541531	278295	278031	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC25A8.01c	prw1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.163075146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767177	2541804	2540346	278295	276875	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC2F12.03c	prw1	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.567396111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767178	2541804	2540829	278295	277347	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC800.09	prw1	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383235089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767179	2541804	2540325	278295	276855	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC21B10.10	prw1	rps402	-	rps4-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.556867231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767180	2541804	2542418	278295	278881	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC1805.07c	prw1	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.60566268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767181	2541804	2538916	278295	275493	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC16C4.17	prw1	mug123	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.182444806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767182	2541804	2541229	278295	277743	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC839.05c	prw1	rps1701	-	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.949741003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767183	2541804	2540677	278295	277202	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC21B10.03c	prw1	ath1	-	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.838818563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767184	2541804	2542326	278295	278792	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC16C9.07	prw1	pom2	-	SPAC2G11.01|mug189|ppk5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.249851699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767185	2541804	2541149	278295	277664	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC651.03c	prw1	gyp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3236535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767186	2541804	2542403	278295	278867	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC19A8.05c	prw1	sst4	-	vps27	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.459832594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767187	2541804	2539729	278295	276281	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC11B10.07c	prw1	ivn1	-	pi004|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.075207411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767188	2541804	2543091	278295	279524	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC12G12.15	prw1	sif3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.538147875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767189	2541804	2543439	278295	279859	SPAC29A4.18	SPAPB1A10.13	prw1	SPAPB1A10.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200929187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767190	2541804	2543437	278295	279857	SPAC29A4.18	SPAPB1A10.14	prw1	pof15	-	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.631378109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767191	2541804	2543427	278295	279847	SPAC29A4.18	SPAPB1A10.15	prw1	arv1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.407856368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767192	2541804	2542727	278295	279177	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC26A3.02	prw1	myh1	-	myh	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.257083043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767193	2541804	2540629	278295	277155	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC21D10.09c	prw1	rkr1	-	SPBC21D10.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.768349619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767194	2541804	2542826	278295	279273	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC13G6.09	prw1	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.032154322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767195	2541804	2540516	278295	277044	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC21C3.01c	prw1	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.21095131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767196	2541804	2540182	278295	276715	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC16G5.06	prw1	SPBC16G5.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.510214007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767197	2541804	2543420	278295	279842	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC3H1.04c	prw1	mdm31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.261166021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767198	2541804	2540297	278295	276828	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC24C6.08c	prw1	bhd1	-	bhd	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379485928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767199	2541804	2539488	278295	276051	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC645.08c	prw1	snd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.117516212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767200	2541804	2540927	278295	277443	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC365.06	prw1	pmt3	-	smt3|ubl2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.259823534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767201	2541804	2541115	278295	277630	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC660.07	prw1	ntp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.155012226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767202	2541804	2543046	278295	279481	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC3C7.10	prw1	pex13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331642587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767203	2541804	2543044	278295	279479	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC3C7.12	prw1	tip1	-	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.226217478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767204	2541804	2541244	278295	277758	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC8D2.02c	prw1	vps68	-	SPBC8D2.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19414793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767205	2541804	2539205	278295	275775	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC4B3.15	prw1	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.126245211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767206	2541804	2540667	278295	277192	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC211.06	prw1	gfh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869697131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767207	2541804	2539920	278295	276464	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC119.08	prw1	pmk1	-	spm1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.464730016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767208	2541804	2540896	278295	277412	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC19C2.13c	prw1	ctu2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.026300701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767209	2541804	2543569	278295	279984	SPAC29A4.18	SPAPB24D3.03	prw1	SPAPB24D3.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195404542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767210	2541804	2539375	278295	275941	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC4G3.11	prw1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.823142449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767211	2541804	2540551	278295	277078	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC23E6.01c	prw1	cxr1	-	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.566042835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767212	2541804	2543380	278295	279802	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC4G9.16c	prw1	rpl901	-	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.146154295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767213	2541804	2539189	278295	275760	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC1682.16	prw1	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.168298028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767214	2541804	2541941	278295	278428	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC20H4.03c	prw1	tfs1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154461368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767215	2541804	2542244	278295	278714	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC19G12.13c	prw1	poz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.984781743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767216	2541804	2542021	278295	278504	SPAC29A4.18	SPAP14E8.02	prw1	tos4	-	SPAP14E8.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873811557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767217	2541804	2540504	278295	277032	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC24C6.10c	prw1	dip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.49735857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767218	2541804	2539483	278295	276046	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC584.02	prw1	cuf2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868308085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767219	2541804	2541238	278295	277752	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC8E4.05c	prw1	SPBC8E4.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.999966741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767220	2541804	2539700	278295	276253	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC1685.15c	prw1	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.008060007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767221	2541804	2543400	278295	279822	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC3G9.11c	prw1	SPAC3G9.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.271984124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767222	2541804	2541357	278295	277868	SPAC29A4.18	SPBPB7E8.01	prw1	SPBPB7E8.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.315636182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767223	2541804	2541806	278295	278297	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC4G8.13c	prw1	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.845584894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767224	2541804	2543327	278295	279750	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC1D4.06c	prw1	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.091901242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767225	2541804	2540828	278295	277346	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC4B4.06	prw1	vps25	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.386268176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767226	2541804	2540496	278295	277024	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC800.11	prw1	SPBC800.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92707346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767227	2541804	2540314	278295	276844	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC2G5.03	prw1	ctu1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.966393723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767228	2541804	2542566	278295	279022	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC8C9.12c	prw1	SPAC8C9.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.565658552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767229	2541804	2542795	278295	279243	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC9G1.05	prw1	aip1	-	SPAC9G1.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922694675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767230	2541804	2540626	278295	277152	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC21C3.08c	prw1	car2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.260191133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767231	2541804	2540481	278295	277009	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC2D10.12	prw1	rhp23	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.767804744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767232	2541804	2539591	278295	276149	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC777.07	prw1	omh3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814122863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767233	2541804	2541869	278295	278359	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC22F3.13	prw1	tsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452819125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767234	2541804	2541478	278295	277980	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC2F7.17	prw1	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504730764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767235	2541804	2543374	278295	279796	SPAC29A4.18	SPAPB1A10.08	prw1	SPAPB1A10.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.35029717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767236	2541804	2543333	278295	279756	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC694.02	prw1	SPAC694.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.763877431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767237	2541804	2538947	278295	275521	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC1682.12c	prw1	ubp16	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.123335362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767238	2541804	2538834	278295	275415	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC126.08c	prw1	SPCC126.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.163057956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767239	2541804	2542111	278295	278587	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC1687.14c	prw1	SPAC1687.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.120651394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767240	2541804	2543448	278295	279868	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC3H5.07	prw1	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.055194562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767241	2541804	2542460	278295	278921	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC1F12.03c	prw1	SPAC1F12.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.118726526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767242	2541804	2540383	278295	276912	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC31E1.02c	prw1	pmr1	-	cps5|pgak2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.790967792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767243	2541804	2542440	278295	278902	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC17A2.12	prw1	rrp1	-	SPAC17A2.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.445587481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767244	2541804	2538696	278295	275281	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC569.06	prw1	SPCC569.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701362484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767245	2541804	2540309	278295	276839	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC21B10.13c	prw1	yox1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.478792268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767246	2541804	2539450	278295	276013	SPAC29A4.18	SPCP31B10.04	prw1	SPCP31B10.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875553096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767247	2541804	2543646	278295	280060	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC821.07c	prw1	moc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.607287377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767248	2541804	2540208	278295	276741	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC9B6.03	prw1	SPBC9B6.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.665643038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767249	2541804	2542617	278295	279071	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC13A11.01c	prw1	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.620382089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767250	2541804	2541062	278295	277577	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC660.11	prw1	tcg1	-	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.513667669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767251	2541804	2541875	278295	278365	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC22F3.06c	prw1	lon1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.118636557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767252	2541804	2540787	278295	277306	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC1921.07c	prw1	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.212492141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767253	2541804	2539494	278295	276057	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC4G3.08	prw1	psk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.868716189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767254	2541804	2542908	278295	279352	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC13G7.03	prw1	upf3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.015888529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767255	2541804	2539001	278295	275575	SPAC29A4.18	SPCC1494.08c	prw1	SPCC1494.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.28875608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767256	2541804	2542444	278295	278906	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC17A5.05c	prw1	SPAC17A5.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.103254803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767257	2541804	2539708	278295	276261	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC1861.06c	prw1	mug131	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813924396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767258	2541804	2542208	278295	278683	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC17G8.08c	prw1	SPAC17G8.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326738989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767259	2541804	2542571	278295	279027	SPAC29A4.18	SPAC589.02c	prw1	med13	-	spTrap240|srb9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.983611923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767260	2541804	2540649	278295	277174	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC19F8.08	prw1	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.687796535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767261	2541804	2540736	278295	277259	SPAC29A4.18	SPBC19F8.02	prw1	SPBC19F8.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636941898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767262	2539579	2543164	276138	279595	SPCP31B10.05	SPAC3G6.06c	tdp1	rad2	-	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.824965251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767263	2539579	2542677	276138	279130	SPCP31B10.05	SPAC26F1.10c	tdp1	pyp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03592267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767264	2539579	2540425	276138	276953	SPCP31B10.05	SPBC27.06c	tdp1	mgr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931938076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767265	2539579	2540893	276138	277409	SPCP31B10.05	SPBC543.10	tdp1	get1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643209275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767266	2539579	2539073	276138	275645	SPCP31B10.05	SPCC1322.02	tdp1	pxd1	-	SPCC1322.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.05501192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767267	2539579	2542407	276138	278871	SPCP31B10.05	SPAC19B12.06c	tdp1	SPAC19B12.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147834994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767268	2540589	2539050	277115	275623	SPBC20F10.06	SPCC11E10.08	mad2	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.28620396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767269	2540589	2542237	277115	278709	SPBC20F10.06	SPAC19E9.02	mad2	fin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.85187944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767270	2540589	2541633	277115	278129	SPBC20F10.06	SPAC664.01c	mad2	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.733369707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767271	2540589	2539309	277115	275876	SPBC20F10.06	SPCC4G3.19	mad2	alp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.47148671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767272	2540589	2539420	277115	275985	SPBC20F10.06	SPCC970.07c	mad2	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.135595522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767273	2540589	2540425	277115	276953	SPBC20F10.06	SPBC27.06c	mad2	mgr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816478315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767274	2540589	2540415	277115	276943	SPBC20F10.06	SPBC30B4.06c	mad2	SPBC30B4.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.26871077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767275	2540589	2540825	277115	277343	SPBC20F10.06	SPBC428.08c	mad2	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.268716428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767276	2540589	2539467	277115	276030	SPBC20F10.06	SPCC417.07c	mad2	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.63111725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767277	2540589	2542311	277115	278777	SPBC20F10.06	SPAC16A10.05c	mad2	dad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.408424441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767278	2540589	2542177	277115	278652	SPBC20F10.06	SPAC17H9.08	mad2	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.608691813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767279	2540589	2539232	277115	275802	SPBC20F10.06	SPCC1223.04c	mad2	set11	-	mug76	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391419844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767280	2540589	2541009	277115	277524	SPBC20F10.06	SPBC428.04	mad2	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.482864973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767281	2540589	3361470	277115	280546	SPBC20F10.06	SPAC3G9.01	mad2	nsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.899297374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767282	2540589	2538848	277115	275429	SPBC20F10.06	SPCC613.12c	mad2	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.237019435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767283	2540589	2540498	277115	277026	SPBC20F10.06	SPBC27.02c	mad2	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.9943299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767284	2540589	2542418	277115	278881	SPBC20F10.06	SPAC1805.07c	mad2	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.783677166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767285	2540589	2541806	277115	278297	SPBC20F10.06	SPAC4G8.13c	mad2	prz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.919676309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767286	2540589	2543387	277115	279809	SPBC20F10.06	SPAPB1E7.02c	mad2	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.933416272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767287	2540589	2543372	277115	279794	SPBC20F10.06	SPAPB1A10.09	mad2	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767288	2540589	2540787	277115	277306	SPBC20F10.06	SPBC1921.07c	mad2	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200585309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767289	5802828	2542207	857966	278682	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC17H9.10c	dad4	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.850871418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767290	5802828	2539050	857966	275623	SPBC3B9.22c	SPCC11E10.08	dad4	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.338132567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767291	5802828	2542862	857966	279308	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC140.03	dad4	arb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.762258532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767292	5802828	2540060	857966	276598	SPBC3B9.22c	SPBC106.01	dad4	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.01063898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767293	5802828	2542518	857966	278976	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC1B3.16c	dad4	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508864256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767294	5802828	2541512	857966	278013	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC11E3.08c	dad4	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8585201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767295	5802828	2542358	857966	278823	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC1782.09c	dad4	clp1	-	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.931796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767296	5802828	2542378	857966	278842	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC1805.04	dad4	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.391877058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767297	5802828	2543524	857966	279942	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC4D7.07c	dad4	csi2	-	SPAC4D7.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.06473858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767298	5802828	2542237	857966	278709	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC19E9.02	dad4	fin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.629899625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767299	5802828	3361561	857966	280637	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC11E3.01c	dad4	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.207273879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767300	5802828	2541853	857966	278344	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC2F3.11	dad4	SPAC2F3.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.825399381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767301	5802828	2541856	857966	278347	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC23H3.08c	dad4	bub3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.502583709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767302	5802828	2541117	857966	277632	SPBC3B9.22c	SPBC646.13	dad4	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.313863586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767303	5802828	2540161	857966	276696	SPBC3B9.22c	SPBC13E7.03c	dad4	SPBC13E7.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.142441103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767304	5802828	2540686	857966	277211	SPBC3B9.22c	SPBC21D10.10	dad4	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388416413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767305	5802828	2539309	857966	275876	SPBC3B9.22c	SPCC4G3.19	dad4	alp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.018655093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767306	5802828	3361436	857966	280512	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC1296.01c	dad4	SPAC1296.01c	-	SPAC22F3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.632444907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767307	5802828	2539420	857966	275985	SPBC3B9.22c	SPCC970.07c	dad4	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.374046037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767308	5802828	2541200	857966	277714	SPBC3B9.22c	SPBC8D2.03c	dad4	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.431931507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767309	5802828	2542468	857966	278929	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC1D4.09c	dad4	rtf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.227860595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767310	5802828	2538847	857966	275428	SPBC3B9.22c	SPCC594.06c	dad4	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.056640795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767311	5802828	2541471	857966	277973	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC1F5.03c	dad4	SPAC1F5.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.942441917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767312	5802828	2542816	857966	279263	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC4G8.11c	dad4	atp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.249878325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767313	5802828	2543579	857966	279994	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC9.11	dad4	SPAC9.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.467998178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767314	5802828	2539564	857966	276125	SPBC3B9.22c	SPCC550.12	dad4	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504537851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767315	5802828	2542848	857966	279294	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC9G1.03c	dad4	rpl3001	-	rpl30|rpl30-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.840433416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767316	5802828	2539434	857966	275997	SPBC3B9.22c	SPCC757.09c	dad4	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.457964928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767317	5802828	2541026	857966	277541	SPBC3B9.22c	SPBC337.09	dad4	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.052736915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767318	5802828	2540220	857966	276753	SPBC3B9.22c	SPBC337.03	dad4	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.505051019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767319	5802828	2540425	857966	276953	SPBC3B9.22c	SPBC27.06c	dad4	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.71452884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767320	5802828	2541424	857966	277929	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC23G3.04	dad4	ies4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.20291487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767321	5802828	2542318	857966	278784	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC16C9.05	dad4	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.711435681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767322	5802828	2542969	857966	279409	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC4G8.10	dad4	gos1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.344766861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767323	5802828	2542277	857966	278746	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC17A5.02c	dad4	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.544721361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767324	5802828	2541580	857966	278077	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC1687.05	dad4	pli1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.653473083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767325	5802828	2543108	857966	279540	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC3A12.13c	dad4	SPAC3A12.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.930086115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767326	5802828	2539244	857966	275814	SPBC3B9.22c	SPCC1672.06c	dad4	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.878606719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767327	5802828	2543563	857966	279979	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC664.02c	dad4	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.949857075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767328	5802828	2538866	857966	275446	SPBC3B9.22c	SPCC1620.12c	dad4	SPCC1620.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197462354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767329	5802828	2543426	857966	279846	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC631.02	dad4	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.462108892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767330	5802828	2538906	857966	275483	SPBC3B9.22c	SPCC1259.03	dad4	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.963367173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767331	5802828	2540825	857966	277343	SPBC3B9.22c	SPBC428.08c	dad4	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.752879377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767332	5802828	2541021	857966	277536	SPBC3B9.22c	SPBC3B8.10c	dad4	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.153149144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767333	5802828	2542268	857966	278737	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC17A5.07c	dad4	ulp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.753952926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767334	5802828	2542036	857966	278518	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC23A1.19c	dad4	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.828037371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767335	5802828	2539467	857966	276030	SPBC3B9.22c	SPCC417.07c	dad4	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.26717216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767336	5802828	2543514	857966	279932	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC4D7.03	dad4	pop2	-	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.241576495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767337	5802828	2541885	857966	278375	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC22H10.03c	dad4	kap114	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.330181673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767338	5802828	2541664	857966	278160	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC2H10.01	dad4	SPAC2H10.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641201058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767339	5802828	2540631	857966	277157	SPBC3B9.22c	SPBC25B2.10	dad4	SPBC25B2.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45390268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767340	5802828	2541776	857966	278270	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC23H3.05c	dad4	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.556484624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767341	5802828	2543445	857966	279865	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC4F10.13c	dad4	mpd2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.965477109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767342	5802828	2542123	857966	278599	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC18G6.15	dad4	mal3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.380515673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767343	5802828	2538706	857966	275290	SPBC3B9.22c	SPCC338.08	dad4	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.847229716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767344	5802828	2538800	857966	275381	SPBC3B9.22c	SPCC1322.06	dad4	kap113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.176946813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767345	5802828	2541889	857966	278379	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC2F7.03c	dad4	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.519769569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767346	5802828	2539219	857966	275789	SPBC3B9.22c	SPCC1795.01c	dad4	mad3	-	SPCC895.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.074618423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767347	5802828	2539484	857966	276047	SPBC3B9.22c	SPCC594.04c	dad4	SPCC594.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508373335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767348	5802828	2543667	857966	280081	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC4H3.02c	dad4	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.443469114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767349	5802828	2541532	857966	278032	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC2C4.15c	dad4	ubx2	-	ucp13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383490626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767350	5802828	2543643	857966	280057	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC3G9.07c	dad4	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.120325774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767351	5802828	2541899	857966	278389	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC22E12.11c	dad4	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.290425262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767352	5802828	2540231	857966	276763	SPBC3B9.22c	SPBC336.14c	dad4	ppk26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.754869455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767353	5802828	2541710	857966	278205	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC343.11c	dad4	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.200120415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767354	5802828	2542126	857966	278602	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC1B3.05	dad4	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.003081087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767355	5802828	2542007	857966	278490	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC20H4.07	dad4	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.908682446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767356	5802828	2543244	857966	279672	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC6B12.06c	dad4	rrg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.117425974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767357	5802828	2540751	857966	277273	SPBC3B9.22c	SPBC20F10.10	dad4	psl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.69102542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767358	5802828	2542976	857966	279414	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC9E9.09c	dad4	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.02214888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767359	5802828	2543378	857966	279800	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC3H8.07c	dad4	pac10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.311849411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767360	5802828	2542549	857966	279006	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC19A8.11c	dad4	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.60072953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767361	5802828	2539408	857966	275973	SPBC3B9.22c	SPCC576.12c	dad4	mhf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.490905247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767362	5802828	2542519	857966	278977	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC19G12.08	dad4	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703106963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767363	5802828	2541009	857966	277524	SPBC3B9.22c	SPBC428.04	dad4	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.859164806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767364	5802828	5802861	857966	857999	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC1D4.01	dad4	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.015500208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767365	5802828	2543443	857966	279863	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC3H1.12c	dad4	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.337872722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767366	5802828	2541536	857966	278036	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC1071.02	dad4	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.774392082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767367	5802828	2541464	857966	277966	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC222.08c	dad4	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.639569031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767368	5802828	2543307	857966	279731	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC694.05c	dad4	rps2502	-	rps25|rps25-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.250706382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767369	5802828	2539847	857966	276395	SPBC3B9.22c	SPBC530.14c	dad4	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.693763835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767370	5802828	3361470	857966	280546	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC3G9.01	dad4	nsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.695675091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767371	5802828	2540844	857966	277361	SPBC3B9.22c	SPBC1921.04c	dad4	SPBC1921.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711156323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767372	5802828	2541488	857966	277990	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC227.17c	dad4	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.301984356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767373	5802828	2541337	857966	277848	SPBC3B9.22c	SPBP35G2.13c	dad4	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.956516671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767374	5802828	2539527	857966	276089	SPBC3B9.22c	SPCC338.16	dad4	pof3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.604700273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767375	5802828	2540589	857966	277115	SPBC3B9.22c	SPBC20F10.06	dad4	mad2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.552579894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767376	5802828	2538848	857966	275429	SPBC3B9.22c	SPCC613.12c	dad4	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.050903546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767377	5802828	3361520	857966	280596	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC1610.02c	dad4	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.150258116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767378	5802828	2539908	857966	276454	SPBC3B9.22c	SPBC13E7.06	dad4	msd1	-	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.344701279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767379	5802828	2539160	857966	275732	SPBC3B9.22c	SPCC18.17c	dad4	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.455914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767380	5802828	2539354	857966	275920	SPBC3B9.22c	SPCC4F11.03c	dad4	SPCC4F11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454359598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767381	5802828	2538762	857966	275345	SPBC3B9.22c	SPCC306.04c	dad4	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.69815438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767382	5802828	2543628	857966	280042	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC3H8.10	dad4	spo20	-	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.872833456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767383	5802828	2542516	857966	278974	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC2F7.04	dad4	pmc2	-	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.920363768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767384	5802828	2540619	857966	277145	SPBC3B9.22c	SPBC25H2.15	dad4	SPBC25H2.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450340647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767385	5802828	2543106	857966	279538	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC3A11.13	dad4	SPAC3A11.13	-	SPAC3H5.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.46468625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767386	5802828	2543670	857966	280084	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAPB1E7.06c	dad4	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.374975057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767387	5802828	2541909	857966	278399	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC227.01c	dad4	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.681537974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767388	5802828	2540498	857966	277026	SPBC3B9.22c	SPBC27.02c	dad4	ask1	-	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040539173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767389	5802828	2543304	857966	279728	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC6B12.12	dad4	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.064851428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767390	5802828	2538966	857966	275540	SPBC3B9.22c	SPCC18.10	dad4	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.623065863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767391	5802828	2540960	857966	277476	SPBC3B9.22c	SPBC3D6.02	dad4	but2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.111980793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767392	5802828	2541531	857966	278031	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC25A8.01c	dad4	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.530502337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767393	5802828	2542418	857966	278881	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC1805.07c	dad4	dad2	-	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195487766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767394	5802828	2542826	857966	279273	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC13G6.09	dad4	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.704622769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767395	5802828	2539668	857966	276223	SPBC3B9.22c	SPBC11B10.10c	dad4	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.097819555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767396	5802828	2540927	857966	277443	SPBC3B9.22c	SPBC365.06	dad4	pmt3	-	smt3|ubl2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.674385643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767397	5802828	2543633	857966	280047	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC3H8.05c	dad4	mms1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.892531818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767398	5802828	2540432	857966	276960	SPBC3B9.22c	SPBC25H2.05	dad4	egd2	-	nac1|ucp15	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.656527029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767399	5802828	2539726	857966	276278	SPBC3B9.22c	SPBC13E7.08c	dad4	leo1	-	SPBC13E7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.177718346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767400	5802828	2538840	857966	275421	SPBC3B9.22c	SPCC736.07c	dad4	SPCC736.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.624908388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767401	5802828	2539189	857966	275760	SPBC3B9.22c	SPCC1682.16	dad4	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.068622423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767402	5802828	2542021	857966	278504	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAP14E8.02	dad4	tos4	-	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.007767676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767403	5802828	2542716	857966	279169	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC25H1.07	dad4	emc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.873290293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767404	5802828	2543384	857966	279806	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC637.06	dad4	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.343691574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767405	5802828	2543387	857966	279809	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAPB1E7.02c	dad4	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.807133614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767406	5802828	2539531	857966	276093	SPBC3B9.22c	SPCC576.02	dad4	SPCC576.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45100518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767407	5802828	2542424	857966	278886	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC1805.14	dad4	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.986841187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767408	5802828	2541478	857966	277980	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC2F7.17	dad4	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.838191768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767409	5802828	2542656	857966	279110	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC2E1P3.05c	dad4	SPAC2E1P3.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.323906251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767410	5802828	2541272	857966	277786	SPBC3B9.22c	SPBC947.03c	dad4	naa38	-	mak31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.410868601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767411	5802828	2541297	857966	277809	SPBC3B9.22c	SPBC9B6.07	dad4	nop52	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.374705156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767412	5802828	2542617	857966	279071	SPBC3B9.22c	SPAC13A11.01c	dad4	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.065328361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767413	5802828	2540649	857966	277174	SPBC3B9.22c	SPBC19F8.08	dad4	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.191035279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767414	2540597	2541656	277123	278152	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC25H1.06	SPBC29A3.09c	pcf3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154347871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767415	2540597	2542291	277123	278759	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC17C9.08	SPBC29A3.09c	pnu1	-	end1|nuc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771856472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767416	2540597	2542518	277123	278976	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC1B3.16c	SPBC29A3.09c	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.554334527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767417	2540597	2541913	277123	278403	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC227.04	SPBC29A3.09c	atg10	-	SPAC227.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872042718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767418	2540597	2542671	277123	279124	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC824.09c	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC824.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148046601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767419	2540597	2538896	277123	275474	SPBC29A3.09c	SPCC584.11c	SPBC29A3.09c	SPCC584.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379891581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767420	2540597	2542345	277123	278811	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC1705.02	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC1705.02	-	SPAC1F2.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330890078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767421	2540597	2542273	277123	278742	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.055761726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767422	2540597	2541500	277123	278002	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC227.18	SPBC29A3.09c	lys3	-	SPAC2F7.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.772967098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767423	2540597	2542689	277123	279142	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC29B12.04	SPBC29A3.09c	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.056561055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767424	2540597	2542848	277123	279294	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC9G1.03c	SPBC29A3.09c	rpl3001	-	rpl30|rpl30-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704577949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767425	2540597	2540425	277123	276953	SPBC29A3.09c	SPBC27.06c	SPBC29A3.09c	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506492568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767426	2540597	2542318	277123	278784	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC29A3.09c	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645105863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767427	2540597	2542277	277123	278746	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC29A3.09c	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711559507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767428	2540597	2539823	277123	276373	SPBC29A3.09c	SPBC16A3.18	SPBC29A3.09c	cip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.126160125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767429	2540597	2542246	277123	278716	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC17H9.12c	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC17H9.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387812367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767430	2540597	2543563	277123	279979	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC664.02c	SPBC29A3.09c	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.683928791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767431	2540597	2543584	277123	279999	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAPB1E7.11c	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319792612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767432	2540597	2542188	277123	278663	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC17H9.01	SPBC29A3.09c	cid16	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932966401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767433	2540597	2541663	277123	278159	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC22G7.08	SPBC29A3.09c	ppk8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391929782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767434	2540597	2542568	277123	279024	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC1952.02	SPBC29A3.09c	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.908960543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767435	2540597	2543020	277123	279456	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC10F6.13c	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC10F6.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.676672521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767436	2540597	2540241	277123	276773	SPBC29A3.09c	SPBC32H8.11	SPBC29A3.09c	mei4	-	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049694647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767437	2540597	2541160	277123	277675	SPBC29A3.09c	SPBC725.09c	SPBC29A3.09c	hob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320796405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767438	2540597	2540338	277123	276867	SPBC29A3.09c	SPBC2G2.13c	SPBC29A3.09c	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.322472008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767439	2540597	2539990	277123	276534	SPBC29A3.09c	SPBC1289.14	SPBC29A3.09c	SPBC1289.14	-	SPBC8E4.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148050127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767440	2540597	2538706	277123	275290	SPBC29A3.09c	SPCC338.08	SPBC29A3.09c	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.14730933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767441	2540597	2539046	277123	275619	SPBC29A3.09c	SPCC1223.12c	SPBC29A3.09c	meu10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506441603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767442	2540597	2543396	277123	279818	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC29A3.09c	dsc4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.064603062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767443	2540597	2540326	277123	276856	SPBC29A3.09c	SPBC2G5.06c	SPBC29A3.09c	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442573934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767444	2540597	2542126	277123	278602	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC29A3.09c	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505701787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767445	2540597	2541955	277123	278442	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC5D6.04	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC5D6.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580169654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767446	2540597	2538880	277123	275459	SPBC29A3.09c	SPCC1393.09c	SPBC29A3.09c	SPCC1393.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201622233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767447	2540597	2542431	277123	278893	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC1A6.01c	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC1A6.01c	-	SPAC23C4.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.873599728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767448	2540597	2542254	277123	278724	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC30D11.04c	SPBC29A3.09c	nup124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.985374281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767449	2540597	2542008	277123	278491	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC2G11.07c	SPBC29A3.09c	ptc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439644763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767450	2540597	2538708	277123	275292	SPBC29A3.09c	SPCC594.01	SPBC29A3.09c	SPCC594.01	-	SPCC736.16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.44376154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767451	2540597	2541464	277123	277966	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC222.08c	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.632514996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767452	2540597	2540229	277123	276761	SPBC29A3.09c	SPBC31F10.15c	SPBC29A3.09c	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.912246038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767453	2540597	2538884	277123	275462	SPBC29A3.09c	SPCC1393.08	SPBC29A3.09c	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445169479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767454	2540597	2543009	277123	279447	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC10F6.06	SPBC29A3.09c	vip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.273341278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767455	2540597	2542602	277123	279056	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC186.09	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC186.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980192113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767456	2540597	2542453	277123	278914	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC186.01	SPBC29A3.09c	pfl9	-	SPAC186.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926237472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767457	2540597	2541963	277123	278449	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC21E11.04	SPBC29A3.09c	aca1	-	ppr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.766519705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767458	2540597	2541144	277123	277659	SPBC29A3.09c	SPBC685.06	SPBC29A3.09c	rps001	-	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581434136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767459	2540597	2542725	277123	279176	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC3A12.10	SPBC29A3.09c	rpl2001	-	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.27265738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767460	2540597	2539160	277123	275732	SPBC29A3.09c	SPCC18.17c	SPBC29A3.09c	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378048639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767461	2540597	2543391	277123	279813	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC4G9.09c	SPBC29A3.09c	arg11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709300071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767462	2540597	2541156	277123	277671	SPBC29A3.09c	SPBC685.07c	SPBC29A3.09c	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049994209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767463	2540597	2543628	277123	280042	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC3H8.10	SPBC29A3.09c	spo20	-	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.682830446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767464	2540597	2542327	277123	278793	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC16C9.06c	SPBC29A3.09c	upf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504270222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767465	2540597	2540498	277123	277026	SPBC29A3.09c	SPBC27.02c	SPBC29A3.09c	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321479775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767466	2540597	2542883	277123	279328	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC29A3.09c	alm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326415879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767467	2540597	2543267	277123	279695	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC1002.12c	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC1002.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.328540167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767468	2540597	2539614	277123	276172	SPBC29A3.09c	SPBC17D11.08	SPBC29A3.09c	SPBC17D11.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819184017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767469	2540597	2541103	277123	277618	SPBC29A3.09c	SPBC651.06	SPBC29A3.09c	mug166	-	csa1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391471723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767470	2540597	2543662	277123	280076	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC9.07c	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC9.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929552127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767471	2540597	2540758	277123	277279	SPBC29A3.09c	SPBC19C2.10	SPBC29A3.09c	SPBC19C2.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.120195096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767472	2540597	2541367	277123	277878	SPBC29A3.09c	SPBP8B7.13	SPBC29A3.09c	vac7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866942047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767473	2540597	2538692	277123	275277	SPBC29A3.09c	SPCC162.04c	SPBC29A3.09c	wtf13	-	wtf12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.198976409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767474	2540597	2540568	277123	277095	SPBC29A3.09c	SPBC28F2.08c	SPBC29A3.09c	SPBC28F2.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925104748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767475	2540597	2540927	277123	277443	SPBC29A3.09c	SPBC365.06	SPBC29A3.09c	pmt3	-	smt3|ubl2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.768035321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767476	2540597	2542250	277123	278720	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC17D4.03c	SPBC29A3.09c	cis4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.99153495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767477	2540597	2543633	277123	280047	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC3H8.05c	SPBC29A3.09c	mms1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.983002896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767478	2540597	2543044	277123	279479	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC29A3.09c	tip1	-	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.316762961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767479	2540597	2539726	277123	276278	SPBC29A3.09c	SPBC13E7.08c	SPBC29A3.09c	leo1	-	SPBC13E7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.010578128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767480	2540597	2539375	277123	275941	SPBC29A3.09c	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC29A3.09c	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44913107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767481	2540597	2538840	277123	275421	SPBC29A3.09c	SPCC736.07c	SPBC29A3.09c	SPCC736.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706083853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767482	2540597	2539169	277123	275740	SPBC29A3.09c	SPCC1235.11	SPBC29A3.09c	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258354619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767483	2540597	2542716	277123	279169	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC25H1.07	SPBC29A3.09c	emc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.566967794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767484	2540597	2543220	277123	279648	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAPB21F2.02	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAPB21F2.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927943367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767485	2540597	2543387	277123	279809	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC29A3.09c	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.074852275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767486	2540597	2543471	277123	279891	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC513.07	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC513.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.447792475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767487	2540597	2540561	277123	277088	SPBC29A3.09c	SPBC28F2.05c	SPBC29A3.09c	SPBC28F2.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505609129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767488	2540597	2540314	277123	276844	SPBC29A3.09c	SPBC2G5.03	SPBC29A3.09c	ctu1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453227339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767489	2540597	2539583	277123	276142	SPBC29A3.09c	SPCC777.04	SPBC29A3.09c	SPCC777.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387490718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767490	2540597	2541050	277123	277565	SPBC29A3.09c	SPBC428.05c	SPBC29A3.09c	arg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.547318803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767491	2540597	2543472	277123	279892	SPBC29A3.09c	SPAC959.04c	SPBC29A3.09c	omh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.052040034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767492	3361526	2542577	280602	279033	SPAC664.15	SPAC19G12.15c	caf4	tpp1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.980419586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767493	3361526	2542701	280602	279154	SPAC664.15	SPAC26H5.05	caf4	mga2	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.210085132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767494	3361526	2541058	280602	277573	SPAC664.15	SPBC3H7.09	caf4	erf2	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	mug142	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875470952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767495	3361526	2540929	280602	277445	SPAC664.15	SPBC354.03	caf4	swd3	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.320329319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767496	3361526	2539302	280602	275870	SPAC664.15	SPCC126.09	caf4	zip2	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	SPCC126.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.450438884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767497	3361526	2540964	280602	277480	SPAC664.15	SPBC365.16	caf4	SPBC365.16	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817667643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767498	3361526	2539467	280602	276030	SPAC664.15	SPCC417.07c	caf4	mto1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256787515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767499	3361526	2540797	280602	277316	SPAC664.15	SPBC18H10.11c	caf4	ppr2	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.679769372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767500	3361526	2538715	280602	275299	SPAC664.15	SPCC1223.05c	caf4	rpl3702	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	rpl37|rpl37-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.193143152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767501	3361526	2539603	280602	276161	SPAC664.15	SPBC1289.06c	caf4	ppr8	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447428131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767502	3361526	2542976	280602	279414	SPAC664.15	SPAC9E9.09c	caf4	atd1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324749709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767503	3361526	2543236	280602	279664	SPAC664.15	SPAC8C9.04	caf4	SPAC8C9.04	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.203010382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767504	3361526	2538841	280602	275422	SPAC664.15	SPCC550.03c	caf4	SPCC550.03c	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511777004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767505	3361526	2540229	280602	276761	SPAC664.15	SPBC31F10.15c	caf4	atp15	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.13842023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767506	3361526	2541927	280602	278415	SPAC664.15	SPAC222.12c	caf4	atp2	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.629522892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767507	3361526	2539527	280602	276089	SPAC664.15	SPCC338.16	caf4	pof3	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.052660529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767508	3361526	2543051	280602	279486	SPAC664.15	SPAC1071.08	caf4	rpp203	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	rla6|rpp2-3|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.316971572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767509	3361526	2539555	280602	276116	SPAC664.15	SPCC4B3.08	caf4	lsg1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147563318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767510	3361526	2539925	280602	276469	SPAC664.15	SPBC16H5.13	caf4	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040759237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767511	3361526	2540421	280602	276949	SPAC664.15	SPBC2D10.19c	caf4	alb1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	SPBC2D10.19c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875461118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767512	3361526	2540829	280602	277347	SPAC664.15	SPBC800.09	caf4	sum2	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.890024139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767513	3361526	2541229	280602	277743	SPAC664.15	SPBC839.05c	caf4	rps1701	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.358024696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767514	3361526	2542326	280602	278792	SPAC664.15	SPAC16C9.07	caf4	pom2	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	SPAC2G11.01|mug189|ppk5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.710420163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767515	3361526	2543337	280602	279760	SPAC664.15	SPAC959.08	caf4	rpl2102	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.843656319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767516	3361526	2542716	280602	279169	SPAC664.15	SPAC25H1.07	caf4	emc1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387452949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767517	3361526	2541806	280602	278297	SPAC664.15	SPAC4G8.13c	caf4	prz1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.66849022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767518	3361526	2541478	280602	277980	SPAC664.15	SPAC2F7.17	caf4	mrf1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77918197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767519	3361526	2543448	280602	279868	SPAC664.15	SPAC3H5.07	caf4	rpl702	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.37528033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767520	2539683	2540131	276238	276668	SPBC146.05c	SPBC1778.05c	cwf25	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3183245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767521	2539683	2539845	276238	276393	SPBC146.05c	SPBC12C2.02c	cwf25	ste20	-	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.264108069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767522	2540932	2540131	277448	276668	SPBC36.09	SPBC1778.05c	sap61	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.570837588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767523	2540932	2539527	277448	276089	SPBC36.09	SPCC338.16	sap61	pof3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807012318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767524	2541208	2542207	277722	278682	SPBC887.04c	SPAC17H9.10c	lub1	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.416882228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767525	2541208	2541562	277722	278061	SPBC887.04c	SPAC24B11.05	lub1	SPAC24B11.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.848931244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767526	2541208	2542862	277722	279308	SPBC887.04c	SPAC140.03	lub1	arb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.253686689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767527	2541208	2543529	277722	279947	SPBC887.04c	SPAC4C5.02c	lub1	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.324585341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767528	2541208	2542585	277722	279040	SPBC887.04c	SPAC31A2.13c	lub1	sft1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.463080239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767529	2541208	2542518	277722	278976	SPBC887.04c	SPAC1B3.16c	lub1	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.445001122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767530	2541208	2540913	277722	277429	SPBC887.04c	SPBC56F2.08c	lub1	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.188889962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767531	2541208	2541570	277722	278067	SPBC887.04c	SPAC6G9.09c	lub1	rpl2401	-	rpl24|rpl24-01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.503532274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767532	2541208	2538977	277722	275551	SPBC887.04c	SPCC1020.06c	lub1	tal1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.040763602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767533	2541208	2542378	277722	278842	SPBC887.04c	SPAC1805.04	lub1	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.942545795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767534	2541208	2541117	277722	277632	SPBC887.04c	SPBC646.13	lub1	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913651683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767535	2541208	2539196	277722	275767	SPBC887.04c	SPCC1795.03	lub1	gms1	-	gmn3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.124167078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767536	2541208	2543572	277722	279987	SPBC887.04c	SPAC4G8.04	lub1	SPAC4G8.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.213665422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767537	2541208	2539226	277722	275796	SPBC887.04c	SPCC16C4.20c	lub1	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388549506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767538	2541208	2541013	277722	277528	SPBC887.04c	SPBC3H7.13	lub1	far10	-	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567304974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767539	2541208	2541471	277722	277973	SPBC887.04c	SPAC1F5.03c	lub1	SPAC1F5.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511851208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767540	2541208	2542555	277722	279012	SPBC887.04c	SPAC1952.06c	lub1	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.240881496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767541	2541208	2540220	277722	276753	SPBC887.04c	SPBC337.03	lub1	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.324138715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767542	2541208	3361385	277722	280461	SPBC887.04c	SPAC1639.02c	lub1	trk2	-	SPAC1F5.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.559119711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767543	2541208	2540727	277722	277250	SPBC887.04c	SPBC1921.03c	lub1	mex67	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.607283226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767544	2541208	2542023	277722	278506	SPBC887.04c	SPAC20H4.10	lub1	ufd2	-	SPAC145.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992714582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767545	2541208	2542277	277722	278746	SPBC887.04c	SPAC17A5.02c	lub1	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.619346937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767546	2541208	2543685	277722	280099	SPBC887.04c	SPAC3C7.03c	lub1	rad55	-	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.435607021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767547	2541208	2542189	277722	278664	SPBC887.04c	SPAC17A5.09c	lub1	glc9	-	SPAC17A5.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.789689257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767548	2541208	2542649	277722	279103	SPBC887.04c	SPAC24C9.14	lub1	otu1	-	mug141	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.909899624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767549	2541208	2539129	277722	275701	SPBC887.04c	SPCC338.14	lub1	ado1	-	SPCC338.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.697636101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767550	2541208	2543563	277722	279979	SPBC887.04c	SPAC664.02c	lub1	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.203325871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767551	2541208	2543584	277722	279999	SPBC887.04c	SPAPB1E7.11c	lub1	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.011843888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767552	2541208	2538906	277722	275483	SPBC887.04c	SPCC1259.03	lub1	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.048869661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767553	2541208	2542268	277722	278737	SPBC887.04c	SPAC17A5.07c	lub1	ulp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930761277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767554	2541208	2542036	277722	278518	SPBC887.04c	SPAC23A1.19c	lub1	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.574743287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767555	2541208	2542311	277722	278777	SPBC887.04c	SPAC16A10.05c	lub1	dad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.591627307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767556	2541208	2543514	277722	279932	SPBC887.04c	SPAC4D7.03	lub1	pop2	-	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.936451565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767557	2541208	2540631	277722	277157	SPBC887.04c	SPBC25B2.10	lub1	SPBC25B2.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153613894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767558	2541208	2540892	277722	277408	SPBC887.04c	SPBC530.01	lub1	gyp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.608894823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767559	2541208	2543511	277722	279929	SPBC887.04c	SPAC4G9.19	lub1	SPAC4G9.19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.92316305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767560	2541208	2539473	277722	276036	SPBC887.04c	SPCP25A2.02c	lub1	rhp26	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932741011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767561	2541208	2543385	277722	279807	SPBC887.04c	SPAC4G9.12	lub1	SPAC4G9.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867280595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767562	2541208	2541982	277722	278467	SPBC887.04c	SPAC23A1.06c	lub1	cmk2	-	mkp2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934036537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767563	2541208	2539845	277722	276393	SPBC887.04c	SPBC12C2.02c	lub1	ste20	-	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.319315887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767564	2541208	2538770	277722	275353	SPBC887.04c	SPCC1753.02c	lub1	git3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19371429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767565	2541208	2540348	277722	276877	SPBC887.04c	SPBC29A10.05	lub1	exo1	-	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.394561719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767566	2541208	2540673	277722	277198	SPBC887.04c	SPBC1D7.03	lub1	mug80	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.352502012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767567	2541208	2542983	277722	279421	SPBC887.04c	SPAC11D3.15	lub1	SPAC11D3.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.051084723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767568	2541208	2542464	277722	278925	SPBC887.04c	SPAC1A6.09c	lub1	lag1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57872938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767569	2541208	2542168	277722	278643	SPBC887.04c	SPAC17A5.16	lub1	ftp105	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.146856555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767570	2541208	2543531	277722	279949	SPBC887.04c	SPAC926.06c	lub1	SPAC926.06c	-	lrr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.052485657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767571	2541208	2539903	277722	276449	SPBC887.04c	SPBC15C4.04c	lub1	SPBC15C4.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.249525693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767572	2541208	2542925	277722	279366	SPBC887.04c	SPAC11E3.04c	lub1	ubc13	-	spu13|sst5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.308611683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767573	2541208	2541352	277722	277863	SPBC887.04c	SPBPJ4664.03	lub1	mfm3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869741067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767574	2541208	2540772	277722	277292	SPBC887.04c	SPBC216.04c	lub1	mxr2	-	SPBC216.04c|MsrB	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.742064651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767575	2541208	2541739	277722	278233	SPBC887.04c	SPAC2G11.10c	lub1	SPAC2G11.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.612537181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767576	2541208	2542126	277722	278602	SPBC887.04c	SPAC1B3.05	lub1	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.021993024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767577	2541208	2540665	277722	277190	SPBC887.04c	SPBC83.02c	lub1	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820697295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767578	2541208	2542007	277722	278490	SPBC887.04c	SPAC20H4.07	lub1	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.561772434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767579	2541208	2542519	277722	278977	SPBC887.04c	SPAC19G12.08	lub1	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387225531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767580	2541208	2539481	277722	276044	SPBC887.04c	SPCC622.16c	lub1	epe1	-	kdm2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.975405877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767581	2541208	2539953	277722	276497	SPBC887.04c	SPBC1709.11c	lub1	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391842576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767582	2541208	2542439	277722	278901	SPBC887.04c	SPAC17A5.08	lub1	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042775369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767583	2541208	2538708	277722	275292	SPBC887.04c	SPCC594.01	lub1	SPCC594.01	-	SPCC736.16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323145682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767584	2541208	2541464	277722	277966	SPBC887.04c	SPAC222.08c	lub1	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.028858436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767585	2541208	2542267	277722	278736	SPBC887.04c	SPAPYUK71.03c	lub1	syn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.04263021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767586	2541208	2540599	277722	277125	SPBC887.04c	SPBC29A3.10c	lub1	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506472058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767587	2541208	3361470	277722	280546	SPBC887.04c	SPAC3G9.01	lub1	nsk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.031334133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767588	2541208	2541614	277722	278111	SPBC887.04c	SPAC29A4.20	lub1	elp3	-	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.631332129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767589	2541208	2543049	277722	279484	SPBC887.04c	SPAC1296.04	lub1	mug65	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.93441336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767590	2541208	2540193	277722	276726	SPBC887.04c	SPBC1289.10c	lub1	adn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.501409775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767591	2541208	2543139	277722	279571	SPBC887.04c	SPAC12G12.03	lub1	cip2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.538828436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767592	2541208	2541017	277722	277532	SPBC887.04c	SPBC36.07	lub1	elp1	-	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03120305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767593	2541208	2542869	277722	279314	SPBC887.04c	SPAC140.02	lub1	gar2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.680523093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767594	2541208	2541628	277722	278124	SPBC887.04c	SPAC110.02	lub1	pds5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580318183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767595	2541208	2543113	277722	279545	SPBC887.04c	SPAC3F10.07c	lub1	erf4	-	mug91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.631101317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767596	2541208	2539842	277722	276390	SPBC887.04c	SPBC14C8.15	lub1	SPBC14C8.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700051839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767597	2541208	2541156	277722	277671	SPBC887.04c	SPBC685.07c	lub1	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.58029904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767598	2541208	2538762	277722	275345	SPBC887.04c	SPCC306.04c	lub1	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.910361781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767599	2541208	2539362	277722	275928	SPBC887.04c	SPCC18B5.10c	lub1	SPCC18B5.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.584080124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767600	2541208	2543619	277722	280033	SPBC887.04c	SPAC4F10.04	lub1	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.159654966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767601	2541208	2541175	277722	277689	SPBC887.04c	SPBC839.13c	lub1	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.471411889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767602	2541208	2543670	277722	280084	SPBC887.04c	SPAPB1E7.06c	lub1	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.371146049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767603	2541208	2541909	277722	278399	SPBC887.04c	SPAC227.01c	lub1	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.869241959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767604	2541208	2540498	277722	277026	SPBC887.04c	SPBC27.02c	lub1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.214412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767605	2541208	2542881	277722	279326	SPBC887.04c	SPAC13F5.03c	lub1	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.000478295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767606	2541208	2539925	277722	276469	SPBC887.04c	SPBC16H5.13	lub1	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.738150199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767607	2541208	2542515	277722	278973	SPBC887.04c	SPAC1952.09c	lub1	SPAC1952.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.001784567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767608	2541208	2540800	277722	277319	SPBC887.04c	SPBC409.20c	lub1	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453765832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767609	2541208	2543304	277722	279728	SPBC887.04c	SPAC6B12.12	lub1	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.085613977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767610	2541208	2543160	277722	279591	SPBC887.04c	SPAC31A2.14	lub1	bun107	-	wdr48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.198380467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767611	2541208	2543066	277722	279499	SPBC887.04c	SPAC343.12	lub1	rds1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.9303257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767612	2541208	2539346	277722	275912	SPBC887.04c	SPCC569.04	lub1	SPCC569.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439347283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767613	2541208	2541470	277722	277972	SPBC887.04c	SPAPYUG7.04c	lub1	rpb9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981650773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767614	2541208	2540829	277722	277347	SPBC887.04c	SPBC800.09	lub1	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.59575473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767615	2541208	2543329	277722	279752	SPBC887.04c	SPAC56F8.02	lub1	SPAC56F8.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509914446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767616	2541208	2539136	277722	275708	SPBC887.04c	SPCC1919.05	lub1	SPCC1919.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.902872721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767617	2541208	2542418	277722	278881	SPBC887.04c	SPAC1805.07c	lub1	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.775526528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767618	2541208	2538916	277722	275493	SPBC887.04c	SPCC16C4.17	lub1	mug123	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.990246681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767619	2541208	2541789	277722	278281	SPBC887.04c	SPAC23H4.08	lub1	iwr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.568573452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767620	2541208	2543633	277722	280047	SPBC887.04c	SPAC3H8.05c	lub1	mms1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702718606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767621	2541208	2542386	277722	278850	SPBC887.04c	SPAC1805.01c	lub1	ppk6	-	SPAPJ736.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.296961578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767622	2541208	2542309	277722	278775	SPBC887.04c	SPAC16A10.02	lub1	sub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979886905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767623	2541208	2540146	277722	276683	SPBC887.04c	SPBC17A3.06	lub1	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.550628797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767624	2541208	2539178	277722	275749	SPBC887.04c	SPCC1682.14	lub1	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.065699952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767625	2541208	2543513	277722	279931	SPBC887.04c	SPAC821.06	lub1	spn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.584783527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767626	2541208	2539700	277722	276253	SPBC887.04c	SPBC1685.15c	lub1	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980870466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767627	2541208	2543400	277722	279822	SPBC887.04c	SPAC3G9.11c	lub1	SPAC3G9.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148396585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767628	2541208	2542795	277722	279243	SPBC887.04c	SPAC9G1.05	lub1	aip1	-	SPAC9G1.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.985719125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767629	2541208	2539085	277722	275657	SPBC887.04c	SPCC285.15c	lub1	rps2802	-	rps28|rps28-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.78925591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767630	2541208	2543151	277722	279583	SPBC887.04c	SPAC343.06c	lub1	SPAC343.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.255170697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767631	2541208	2540309	277722	276839	SPBC887.04c	SPBC21B10.13c	lub1	yox1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820381664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767632	2541208	2543624	277722	280038	SPBC887.04c	SPAC4D7.06c	lub1	SPAC4D7.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.324397703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767633	2541208	2540938	277722	277454	SPBC887.04c	SPBC365.14c	lub1	uge1	-	gal10	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922239809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767634	2541208	2543646	277722	280060	SPBC887.04c	SPAC821.07c	lub1	moc3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.030247114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767635	2541208	2543616	277722	280030	SPBC887.04c	SPAC4A8.09c	lub1	cwf21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.311124867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767636	2541208	2539494	277722	276057	SPBC887.04c	SPCC4G3.08	lub1	psk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783431544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767637	2541208	2541893	277722	278383	SPBC887.04c	SPAC23H4.13c	lub1	SPAC23H4.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379093291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767638	2540187	2542518	276720	278976	SPBC1271.01c	SPAC1B3.16c	pof13	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57680882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767639	2540187	2542747	276720	279197	SPBC1271.01c	SPAC15A10.06	pof13	SPAC15A10.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.933484457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767640	2540187	2542677	276720	279130	SPBC1271.01c	SPAC26F1.10c	pof13	pyp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.93277568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767641	2540187	2538801	276720	275382	SPBC1271.01c	SPCC285.13c	pof13	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.504074395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767642	2540187	2539302	276720	275870	SPBC1271.01c	SPCC126.09	pof13	zip2	-	SPCC126.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.314527247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767643	2540187	2543296	276720	279721	SPBC1271.01c	SPAC9E9.03	pof13	leu2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864799464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767644	2540187	2540834	276720	277352	SPBC1271.01c	SPBC18H10.18c	pof13	SPBC18H10.18c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035251524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767645	2540187	2543208	276720	279637	SPBC1271.01c	SPAC328.04	pof13	SPAC328.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035848853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767646	2540187	2540886	276720	277403	SPBC1271.01c	SPBC4F6.10	pof13	vps901	-	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.909871787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767647	2540187	2541096	276720	277611	SPBC1271.01c	SPBC725.10	pof13	SPBC725.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.41298304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767648	2540187	2540452	276720	276980	SPBC1271.01c	SPBC2A9.11c	pof13	iss9	-	SPBC2A9.11c|SPBC2D10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.437420795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767649	2540187	2540326	276720	276856	SPBC1271.01c	SPBC2G5.06c	pof13	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.121923874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767650	2540187	2541142	276720	277657	SPBC1271.01c	SPBC725.04	pof13	SPBC725.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.062056888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767651	2540187	2542597	276720	279051	SPBC1271.01c	SPAP8A3.07c	pof13	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.868750074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767652	2540187	2543071	276720	279504	SPBC1271.01c	SPAC3C7.06c	pof13	pit1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.24932438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767653	2540187	2540498	276720	277026	SPBC1271.01c	SPBC27.02c	pof13	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.115027942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767654	2540187	2543044	276720	279479	SPBC1271.01c	SPAC3C7.12	pof13	tip1	-	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448247789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767655	2540187	2539205	276720	275775	SPBC1271.01c	SPCC4B3.15	pof13	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.126811929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767656	2540187	2540896	276720	277412	SPBC1271.01c	SPBC19C2.13c	pof13	ctu2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439877102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767657	2540187	2539189	276720	275760	SPBC1271.01c	SPCC1682.16	pof13	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.982489412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767658	2540187	2543333	276720	279756	SPBC1271.01c	SPAC694.02	pof13	SPAC694.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38288595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767659	2540187	2542890	276720	279334	SPBC1271.01c	SPAC13G6.14	pof13	aps1	-	SPAC24B11.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647035147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767660	2540187	2542571	276720	279027	SPBC1271.01c	SPAC589.02c	pof13	med13	-	spTrap240|srb9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642418378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767661	2539563	2539890	276124	276436	SPCC550.15c	SPBC16C6.03c	SPCC550.15c	SPBC16C6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2586431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767662	2539563	2542689	276124	279142	SPCC550.15c	SPAC29B12.04	SPCC550.15c	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634844658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767663	2539563	2539733	276124	276285	SPCC550.15c	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC550.15c	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.389233067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767664	2539563	2542420	276124	278883	SPCC550.15c	SPAC19D5.03	SPCC550.15c	cid1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.331960126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767665	2539563	2539484	276124	276047	SPCC550.15c	SPCC594.04c	SPCC550.15c	SPCC594.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.627835495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767666	2539563	2541464	276124	277966	SPCC550.15c	SPAC222.08c	SPCC550.15c	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.39083395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767667	2539563	2542198	276124	278673	SPCC550.15c	SPAC6F12.09	SPCC550.15c	rdp1	-	rdr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.14715884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767668	2539563	2543219	276124	279647	SPCC550.15c	SPAC56F8.09	SPCC550.15c	rrp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.873468543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767669	2539563	2543087	276124	279520	SPCC550.15c	SPAC30C2.04	SPCC550.15c	SPAC30C2.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046530477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767670	2541479	2541117	277981	277632	SPAC27F1.06c	SPBC646.13	SPAC27F1.06c	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517928214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767671	2541479	2542220	277981	278694	SPAC27F1.06c	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC27F1.06c	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.253283605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767672	2541479	2540533	277981	277061	SPAC27F1.06c	SPBC29A10.16c	SPAC27F1.06c	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.629695358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767673	2541479	3361389	277981	280465	SPAC27F1.06c	SPAC977.13c	SPAC27F1.06c	SPAC977.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.079365074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767674	2541479	2538730	277981	275314	SPAC27F1.06c	SPCC31H12.02c	SPAC27F1.06c	mug73	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.082570967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767675	2540683	2543152	277208	279584	SPBC19G7.04	SPAC869.03c	SPBC19G7.04	SPAC869.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933376692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767676	2540683	2540433	277208	276961	SPBC19G7.04	SPBC2D10.06	SPBC19G7.04	rep1	-	rec16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385005499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767677	2540683	2539331	277208	275897	SPBC19G7.04	SPCC24B10.09	SPBC19G7.04	rps1702	-	rps17|rps17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.129553983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767678	2540683	2541379	277208	277890	SPBC19G7.04	SPBP8B7.27	SPBC19G7.04	mug30	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.946969641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767679	2540683	2540256	277208	276787	SPBC19G7.04	SPBC32F12.12c	SPBC19G7.04	SPBC32F12.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.441239627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767680	2540683	2539958	277208	276502	SPBC19G7.04	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC19G7.04	zfs1	-	moc4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580682531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767681	2540683	2541009	277208	277524	SPBC19G7.04	SPBC428.04	SPBC19G7.04	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.777087424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767682	2540683	2541614	277208	278111	SPBC19G7.04	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC19G7.04	elp3	-	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.243631518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767683	2540683	2539686	277208	276241	SPBC19G7.04	SPBC1734.06	SPBC19G7.04	rhp18	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092002929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767684	2540683	2542883	277208	279328	SPBC19G7.04	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC19G7.04	alm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.315149149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767685	2540683	2541425	277208	277930	SPBC19G7.04	SPAC2C4.17c	SPBC19G7.04	msy2	-	SPAC2C4.17c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647325483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767686	2540683	2541531	277208	278031	SPBC19G7.04	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC19G7.04	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.669688296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767687	2540683	2541678	277208	278174	SPBC19G7.04	SPAP7G5.05	SPBC19G7.04	rpl1002	-	rpl10|rpl10-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767400052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767688	2540683	2542418	277208	278881	SPBC19G7.04	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC19G7.04	dad2	-	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98760595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767689	2540683	2542716	277208	279169	SPBC19G7.04	SPAC25H1.07	SPBC19G7.04	emc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.33045738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767690	2540643	2542895	277168	279339	SPBC19G7.06	SPAC13G6.10c	mbx1	asl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877260414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767691	2540643	2543064	277168	279497	SPBC19G7.06	SPAC3G6.01	mbx1	hrp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462848962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767692	2540643	2540410	277168	276938	SPBC19G7.06	SPBC2D10.04	mbx1	SPBC2D10.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702121781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767693	2540643	2539890	277168	276436	SPBC19G7.06	SPBC16C6.03c	mbx1	SPBC16C6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317260809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767694	2540643	2542345	277168	278811	SPBC19G7.06	SPAC1705.02	mbx1	SPAC1705.02	-	SPAC1F2.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.558356142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767695	2540643	2540999	277168	277515	SPBC19G7.06	SPBC4B4.04	mbx1	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.862726959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767696	2540643	2540160	277168	276695	SPBC19G7.06	SPBC1773.17c	mbx1	SPBC1773.17c	-	SPBP26C9.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389935834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767697	2540643	2542698	277168	279151	SPBC19G7.06	SPAC26H5.09c	mbx1	SPAC26H5.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.841905889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767698	2540643	2543584	277168	279999	SPBC19G7.06	SPAPB1E7.11c	mbx1	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.774204404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767699	2540643	2539003	277168	275577	SPBC19G7.06	SPCC1442.17c	mbx1	ist1	-	SPCC285.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511912276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767700	2540643	2541801	277168	278292	SPBC19G7.06	SPAC2F7.08c	mbx1	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.482237066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767701	2540643	2542660	277168	279113	SPBC19G7.06	SPAC328.03	mbx1	tps1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.053154144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767702	2540643	2541496	277168	277998	SPBC19G7.06	SPAC23D3.09	mbx1	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.938543848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767703	2540643	2539667	277168	276222	SPBC19G7.06	SPBC13G1.08c	mbx1	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.132392699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767704	2540643	2540751	277168	277273	SPBC19G7.06	SPBC20F10.10	mbx1	psl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.900878108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767705	2540643	2542740	277168	279190	SPBC19G7.06	SPAC9G1.06c	mbx1	cyk3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.14552795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767706	2540643	2540327	277168	276857	SPBC19G7.06	SPBC31F10.07	mbx1	lsb5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262147173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767707	2540643	2542439	277168	278901	SPBC19G7.06	SPAC17A5.08	mbx1	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870357271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767708	2540643	2542618	277168	279072	SPBC19G7.06	SPAC1952.15c	mbx1	rec24	-	mug6	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57861113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767709	2540643	2541464	277168	277966	SPBC19G7.06	SPAC222.08c	mbx1	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447207565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767710	2540643	2543011	277168	279449	SPBC19G7.06	SPAC10F6.11c	mbx1	atg17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.845430738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767711	2540643	2541628	277168	278124	SPBC19G7.06	SPAC110.02	mbx1	pds5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814642312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767712	2540643	2539354	277168	275920	SPBC19G7.06	SPCC4F11.03c	mbx1	SPCC4F11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.754652087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767713	2540643	2543619	277168	280033	SPBC19G7.06	SPAC4F10.04	mbx1	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.057882227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767714	2540643	2539438	277168	276001	SPBC19G7.06	SPCC4B3.07	mbx1	nro1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.096586506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767715	2540643	2542883	277168	279328	SPBC19G7.06	SPAC1486.04c	mbx1	alm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.70204052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767716	2540643	2540555	277168	277082	SPBC19G7.06	SPBP16F5.02	mbx1	mcs2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.350043056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767717	2540643	2543337	277168	279760	SPBC19G7.06	SPAC959.08	mbx1	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778624193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767718	2540643	2543384	277168	279806	SPBC19G7.06	SPAC637.06	mbx1	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875038226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767719	2540643	2542175	277168	278650	SPBC19G7.06	SPAC1F3.02c	mbx1	mkh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.830797864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767720	2540643	2540558	277168	277085	SPBC19G7.06	SPBC2D10.17	mbx1	clr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.185668806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767721	2540643	2543448	277168	279868	SPBC19G7.06	SPAC3H5.07	mbx1	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.564652759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767722	2542069	2538939	278546	275514	SPAC27D7.13c	SPCC1672.04c	ssm4	SPCC1672.04c	SPAC637.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869217231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767723	2542069	2542430	278546	278892	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC17G6.06	ssm4	rps2401	SPAC637.01c	rps24|rps24-1|rps24a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.403796776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767724	2542069	2542812	278546	279259	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC6F6.01	ssm4	cch1	SPAC637.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.622086055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767725	2542069	2543575	278546	279990	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC644.13c	ssm4	SPAC644.13c	SPAC637.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093240597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767726	2542069	2543339	278546	279762	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC630.13c	ssm4	tsc2	SPAC637.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.132603581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767727	2542069	2541117	278546	277632	SPAC27D7.13c	SPBC646.13	ssm4	sds23	SPAC637.01c	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378420079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767728	2542069	2540161	278546	276696	SPAC27D7.13c	SPBC13E7.03c	ssm4	SPBC13E7.03c	SPAC637.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.99041995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767729	2542069	2543434	278546	279854	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC8F11.02c	ssm4	dph3	SPAC637.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512795838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767730	2542069	2540535	278546	277062	SPAC27D7.13c	SPBC215.01	ssm4	SPBC215.01	SPAC637.01c	SPBC3B9.20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.845730764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767731	2542069	2543320	278546	279744	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAPJ695.01c	ssm4	SPAPJ695.01c	SPAC637.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979611971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767732	2542069	2540251	278546	276783	SPAC27D7.13c	SPBC336.05c	ssm4	SPBC336.05c	SPAC637.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094124299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767733	2542069	2543681	278546	280095	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC9.02c	ssm4	SPAC9.02c	SPAC637.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041463471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767734	2542069	2538801	278546	275382	SPAC27D7.13c	SPCC285.13c	ssm4	nup60	SPAC637.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984930264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767735	2542069	2541560	278546	278059	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC24B11.12c	ssm4	SPAC24B11.12c	SPAC637.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099797496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767736	2542069	2539175	278546	275746	SPAC27D7.13c	SPCC16C4.01	ssm4	sif2	SPAC637.01c	SPCC5E4.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981360879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767737	2542069	2539244	278546	275814	SPAC27D7.13c	SPCC1672.06c	ssm4	asp1	SPAC637.01c	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.773941588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767738	2542069	2542253	278546	278723	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC17H9.04c	ssm4	SPAC17H9.04c	SPAC637.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046385929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767739	2542069	2540631	278546	277157	SPAC27D7.13c	SPBC25B2.10	ssm4	SPBC25B2.10	SPAC637.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.217274017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767740	2542069	2540192	278546	276725	SPAC27D7.13c	SPBC1215.01	ssm4	shy1	SPAC637.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81932029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767741	2542069	2543385	278546	279807	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC4G9.12	ssm4	SPAC4G9.12	SPAC637.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047572593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767742	2542069	2540401	278546	276929	SPAC27D7.13c	SPBC2A9.02	ssm4	SPBC2A9.02	SPAC637.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.274530663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767743	2542069	2538770	278546	275353	SPAC27D7.13c	SPCC1753.02c	ssm4	git3	SPAC637.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930754336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767744	2542069	2540647	278546	277172	SPAC27D7.13c	SPBC18H10.07	ssm4	SPBC18H10.07	SPAC637.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.908241158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767745	2542069	2542776	278546	279225	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC167.01	ssm4	ire1	SPAC637.01c	ppk4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980735898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767746	2542069	2542983	278546	279421	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC11D3.15	ssm4	SPAC11D3.15	SPAC637.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.294560779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767747	2542069	2540150	278546	276687	SPAC27D7.13c	SPBC16E9.14c	ssm4	zrg17	SPAC637.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.662320871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767748	2542069	2540886	278546	277403	SPAC27D7.13c	SPBC4F6.10	ssm4	vps901	SPAC637.01c	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.412570015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767749	2542069	2541109	278546	277624	SPAC27D7.13c	SPBC6B1.02	ssm4	ppk30	SPAC637.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.057490511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767750	2542069	2540452	278546	276980	SPAC27D7.13c	SPBC2A9.11c	ssm4	iss9	SPAC637.01c	SPBC2A9.11c|SPBC2D10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639844032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767751	2542069	2538769	278546	275352	SPAC27D7.13c	SPCC126.04c	ssm4	sgf73	SPAC637.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.879463376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767752	2542069	3361269	278546	280345	SPAC27D7.13c	SPBC31A8.01c	ssm4	rtn1	SPAC637.01c	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.264915637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767753	2542069	2540194	278546	276727	SPAC27D7.13c	SPBC1709.09	ssm4	rrf1	SPAC637.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815471196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767754	2542069	2542528	278546	278986	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC1B3.08	ssm4	SPAC1B3.08	SPAC637.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769569147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767755	2542069	2541955	278546	278442	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC5D6.04	ssm4	SPAC5D6.04	SPAC637.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092846237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767756	2542069	2542946	278546	279386	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC6F12.03c	ssm4	fsv1	SPAC637.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569382954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767757	2542069	2542419	278546	278882	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC17G6.05c	ssm4	bro1	SPAC637.01c	SPAC17G6.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386671847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767758	2542069	2542498	278546	278957	SPAC27D7.13c	SPACUNK4.16c	ssm4	SPACUNK4.16c	SPAC637.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577241197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767759	2542069	2540394	278546	276922	SPAC27D7.13c	SPBC2D10.09	ssm4	snr1	SPAC637.01c	SPBC2D10.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706315762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767760	2542069	2540318	278546	276848	SPAC27D7.13c	SPBC30B4.04c	ssm4	sol1	SPAC637.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982133046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767761	2542069	2539953	278546	276497	SPAC27D7.13c	SPBC1709.11c	ssm4	png2	SPAC637.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323986727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767762	2542069	2542919	278546	279360	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC6C3.08	ssm4	nas6	SPAC637.01c	SPAC6C3.08	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98470189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767763	2542069	2542437	278546	278899	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC17A5.01	ssm4	pex6	SPAC637.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809017551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767764	2542069	2543443	278546	279863	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC3H1.12c	ssm4	snt2	SPAC637.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783647297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767765	2542069	2541694	278546	278190	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC1071.04c	ssm4	spc2	SPAC637.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325276834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767766	2542069	2540342	278546	276871	SPAC27D7.13c	SPBC2G2.01c	ssm4	liz1	SPAC637.01c	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.250302454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767767	2542069	2540599	278546	277125	SPAC27D7.13c	SPBC29A3.10c	ssm4	atp14	SPAC637.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385780233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767768	2542069	2539605	278546	276163	SPAC27D7.13c	SPBC1105.13c	ssm4	SPBC1105.13c	SPAC637.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709608504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767769	2542069	2540930	278546	277446	SPAC27D7.13c	SPBC354.10	ssm4	def1	SPAC637.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.611771397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767770	2542069	2539519	278546	276081	SPAC27D7.13c	SPCC364.05	ssm4	vps3	SPAC637.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.61786524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767771	2542069	2541742	278546	278236	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC22H10.09	ssm4	SPAC22H10.09	SPAC637.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048617677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767772	2542069	2541713	278546	278208	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC3A12.12	ssm4	atp11	SPAC637.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147348506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767773	2542069	3361389	278546	280465	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC977.13c	ssm4	SPAC977.13c	SPAC637.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.384862958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767774	2542069	2540226	278546	276758	SPAC27D7.13c	SPBC32H8.08c	ssm4	omh5	SPAC637.01c	pi016|SPACTOKYO_453.20	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.517306506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767775	2542069	2539555	278546	276116	SPAC27D7.13c	SPCC4B3.08	ssm4	lsg1	SPAC637.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.980931447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767776	2542069	2543567	278546	279983	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC890.03	ssm4	ppk16	SPAC637.01c	mug92	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994599712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767777	2542069	2541909	278546	278399	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC227.01c	ssm4	erd1	SPAC637.01c	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.850323615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767778	2542069	2539246	278546	275816	SPAC27D7.13c	SPCC18.13	ssm4	SPCC18.13	SPAC637.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.196118981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767779	2542069	2543136	278546	279568	SPAC27D7.13c	SPBC1348.07	ssm4	SPBC1348.07	SPAC637.01c	SPAC1348.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047341404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767780	2542069	2538756	278546	275339	SPAC27D7.13c	SPCC1795.10c	ssm4	SPCC1795.10c	SPAC637.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046003181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767781	2542069	2543091	278546	279524	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC12G12.15	ssm4	sif3	SPAC637.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.67145529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767782	2542069	2541380	278546	277891	SPAC27D7.13c	SPBPB2B2.13	ssm4	gal1	SPAC637.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987610606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767783	2542069	2542442	278546	278904	SPAC27D7.13c	SPACUNK12.02c	ssm4	cmk1	SPAC637.01c	CaMK-I|SPAC25D11.02C	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325504103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767784	2542069	2541774	278546	278268	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC22E12.05c	ssm4	rer1	SPAC637.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.84485655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767785	2542069	2541029	278546	277544	SPAC27D7.13c	SPBC409.10	ssm4	ade7	SPAC637.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381136387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767786	2542069	2539014	278546	275587	SPAC27D7.13c	SPCC18B5.05c	ssm4	SPCC18B5.05c	SPAC637.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.151674117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767787	2542069	2540481	278546	277009	SPAC27D7.13c	SPBC2D10.12	ssm4	rhp23	SPAC637.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319641765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767788	2542069	2543090	278546	279523	SPAC27D7.13c	SPBC1348.01	ssm4	SPBC1348.01	SPAC637.01c	SPAC1348.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.260649051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767789	2542069	2540309	278546	276839	SPAC27D7.13c	SPBC21B10.13c	ssm4	yox1	SPAC637.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.198139925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767790	2542069	2540067	278546	276605	SPAC27D7.13c	SPBC16H5.05c	ssm4	cyp7	SPAC637.01c	cwf27	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.412313365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767791	2542069	2542578	278546	279034	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC18B11.09c	ssm4	SPAC18B11.09c	SPAC637.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.151885328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767792	2542667	2543529	279120	279947	SPAC26A3.16	SPAC4C5.02c	dph1	ryh1	ucp5	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634174489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767793	2542667	2543685	279120	280099	SPAC26A3.16	SPAC3C7.03c	dph1	rad55	ucp5	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.876392946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767794	2541013	2543529	277528	279947	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC4C5.02c	far10	ryh1	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.524212024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767795	2541013	2540885	277528	277402	SPBC3H7.13	SPBC660.14	far10	mik1	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643403781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767796	2541013	2543414	277528	279836	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC630.10	far10	SPAC630.10	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.05170803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767797	2541013	2542358	277528	278823	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC1782.09c	far10	clp1	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.16802399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767798	2541013	2540161	277528	276696	SPBC3H7.13	SPBC13E7.03c	far10	SPBC13E7.03c	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.371791559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767799	2541013	2542614	277528	279068	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC1399.04c	far10	SPAC1399.04c	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.090878112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767800	2541013	2540686	277528	277211	SPBC3H7.13	SPBC21D10.10	far10	bdc1	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.549768606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767801	2541013	2542103	277528	278579	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC31G5.11	far10	pac2	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.035046986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767802	2541013	2541208	277528	277722	SPBC3H7.13	SPBC887.04c	far10	lub1	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567304974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767803	2541013	2542273	277528	278742	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC17H9.13c	far10	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.017086799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767804	2541013	2541500	277528	278002	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC227.18	far10	lys3	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	SPAC2F7.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.073977528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767805	2541013	2541483	277528	277985	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC227.14	far10	SPAC227.14	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.121665087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767806	2541013	2539576	277528	276136	SPBC3H7.13	SPCC794.01c	far10	zwf2	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	SPCC794.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.462059584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767807	2541013	2540692	277528	277217	SPBC3H7.13	SPBC800.07c	far10	tsf1	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.591028125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767808	2541013	2541761	277528	278255	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC7D4.12c	far10	SPAC7D4.12c	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.153657101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767809	2541013	2541323	277528	277835	SPBC3H7.13	SPBP35G2.14	far10	SPBP35G2.14	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.66277516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767810	2541013	2539792	277528	276342	SPBC3H7.13	SPBC1271.14	far10	SPBC1271.14	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.96235408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767811	2541013	2539352	277528	275918	SPBC3H7.13	SPCC188.07	far10	ccq1	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388412291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767812	2541013	2538906	277528	275483	SPBC3H7.13	SPCC1259.03	far10	rpa12	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645962416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767813	2541013	2541021	277528	277536	SPBC3H7.13	SPBC3B8.10c	far10	nem1	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570260121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767814	2541013	2541938	277528	278425	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC8C9.16c	far10	mug63	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.968423881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767815	2541013	2541249	277528	277763	SPBC3H7.13	SPBC947.01	far10	alf1	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	SPBC947.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.920694567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767816	2541013	2542513	277528	278971	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC1952.05	far10	gcn5	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.137998818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767817	2541013	2541776	277528	278270	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC23H3.05c	far10	swd1	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.530342619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767818	2541013	2543593	277528	280008	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC4G9.10	far10	arg3	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.937182658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767819	2541013	2543412	277528	279834	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC637.07	far10	moe1	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320268788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767820	2541013	2542464	277528	278925	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC1A6.09c	far10	lag1	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.177868163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767821	2541013	2543638	277528	280052	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC3H8.09c	far10	nab3	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.051959727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767822	2541013	2541889	277528	278379	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC2F7.03c	far10	pom1	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.868360121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767823	2541013	2541943	277528	278430	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC222.07c	far10	hri2	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.071469936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767824	2541013	2541496	277528	277998	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC23D3.09	far10	arp42	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633395427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767825	2541013	2541183	277528	277697	SPBC3H7.13	SPBC725.14	far10	arg6	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.326958054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767826	2541013	2543117	277528	279549	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC806.08c	far10	mod21	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.395632918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767827	2541013	2540831	277528	277349	SPBC3H7.13	SPBC428.02c	far10	eca39	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	SPBC582.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154846469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767828	2541013	2542528	277528	278986	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC1B3.08	far10	SPAC1B3.08	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.610924977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767829	2541013	2539815	277528	276365	SPBC3H7.13	SPBC1105.02c	far10	lys4	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.477570844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767830	2541013	2542254	277528	278724	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC30D11.04c	far10	nup124	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.011468983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767831	2541013	2542867	277528	279312	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC343.16	far10	lys2	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.004114194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767832	2541013	2540327	277528	276857	SPBC3H7.13	SPBC31F10.07	far10	lsb5	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.437389026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767833	2541013	2542549	277528	279006	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC19A8.11c	far10	SPAC19A8.11c	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.594619555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767834	2541013	2542519	277528	278977	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC19G12.08	far10	scs7	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504511091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767835	2541013	2539215	277528	275785	SPBC3H7.13	SPCC285.16c	far10	msh6	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.602985776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767836	2541013	2543576	277528	279991	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC4A8.05c	far10	myp2	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	myo3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.113822607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767837	2541013	2542008	277528	278491	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC2G11.07c	far10	ptc3	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.310916952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767838	2541013	2541186	277528	277700	SPBC3H7.13	SPBC725.01	far10	SPBC725.01	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.534491644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767839	2541013	2540229	277528	276761	SPBC3H7.13	SPBC31F10.15c	far10	atp15	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189265022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767840	2541013	2538884	277528	275462	SPBC3H7.13	SPCC1393.08	far10	SPCC1393.08	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.603265742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767841	2541013	2541488	277528	277990	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC227.17c	far10	SPAC227.17c	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.838361195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767842	2541013	2543011	277528	279449	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC10F6.11c	far10	atg17	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.942202354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767843	2541013	2539569	277528	276129	SPBC3H7.13	SPCPB16A4.03c	far10	ade10	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.175259809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767844	2541013	2539812	277528	276362	SPBC3H7.13	SPBC1347.02	far10	fkbp39	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.821441086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767845	2541013	2539160	277528	275732	SPBC3H7.13	SPCC18.17c	far10	SPCC18.17c	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.624943089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767846	2541013	2543391	277528	279813	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC4G9.09c	far10	arg11	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.102335852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767847	2541013	2543628	277528	280042	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC3H8.10	far10	spo20	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.462745839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767848	2541013	2539137	277528	275709	SPBC3H7.13	SPCC1682.08c	far10	mcp2	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.500321703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767849	2541013	2542940	277528	279381	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC31A2.12	far10	SPAC31A2.12	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.096009831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767850	2541013	2540531	277528	277059	SPBC3H7.13	SPBC23E6.08	far10	sat1	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.759073051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767851	2541013	2541432	277528	277937	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC1F5.05c	far10	mso1	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.559419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767852	2541013	2543192	277528	279621	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC343.18	far10	rfp2	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.235820729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767853	2541013	2541948	277528	278435	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC222.13c	far10	SPAC222.13c	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.315465967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767854	2541013	2539205	277528	275775	SPBC3H7.13	SPCC4B3.15	far10	mid1	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.647826778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767855	2541013	2542716	277528	279169	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC25H1.07	far10	emc1	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.475026182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767856	2541013	2541806	277528	278297	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC4G8.13c	far10	prz1	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.562664578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767857	2541013	2543387	277528	279809	SPBC3H7.13	SPAPB1E7.02c	far10	mcl1	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.983403691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767858	2541013	2541050	277528	277565	SPBC3H7.13	SPBC428.05c	far10	arg12	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.742077887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767859	2541013	2542700	277528	279153	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC26H5.08c	far10	bgl2	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.362071784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767860	2541013	2542609	277528	279063	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC31G5.04	far10	lys12	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	SPAC31G5.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.654271047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767861	2540879	2542207	277396	278682	SPBC530.13	SPAC17H9.10c	lsc1	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.423280003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767862	2540879	2539050	277396	275623	SPBC530.13	SPCC11E10.08	lsc1	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.559203427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767863	2540879	2539147	277396	275719	SPBC530.13	SPCC622.12c	lsc1	gdh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.906891492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767864	2540879	2542585	277396	279040	SPBC530.13	SPAC31A2.13c	lsc1	sft1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.56405606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767865	2540879	2541343	277396	277854	SPBC530.13	SPBPB2B2.19c	lsc1	SPBPB2B2.19c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.198679388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767866	2540879	2541912	277396	278402	SPBC530.13	SPAC222.16c	lsc1	csn3	-	SPAC821.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.886048717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767867	2540879	2538977	277396	275551	SPBC530.13	SPCC1020.06c	lsc1	tal1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987649011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767868	2540879	2539156	277396	275728	SPBC530.13	SPCC1450.08c	lsc1	wtf16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.683965402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767869	2540879	2541552	277396	278051	SPBC530.13	SPAC1142.08	lsc1	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.118989388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767870	2540879	2540524	277396	277052	SPBC530.13	SPBC21B10.08c	lsc1	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.140456736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767871	2540879	2542358	277396	278823	SPBC530.13	SPAC1782.09c	lsc1	clp1	-	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.06474222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767872	2540879	3361561	277396	280637	SPBC530.13	SPAC11E3.01c	lsc1	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.916245392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767873	2540879	2541633	277396	278129	SPBC530.13	SPAC664.01c	lsc1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.061398172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767874	2540879	2540491	277396	277019	SPBC530.13	SPBC28E12.04	lsc1	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.462549619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767875	2540879	2538806	277396	275387	SPBC530.13	SPCC1840.09	lsc1	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.287465827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767876	2540879	2539420	277396	275985	SPBC530.13	SPCC970.07c	lsc1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.415078291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767877	2540879	2542273	277396	278742	SPBC530.13	SPAC17H9.13c	lsc1	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.841241216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767878	2540879	2539937	277396	276481	SPBC530.13	SPBC1539.08	lsc1	arf6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035518888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767879	2540879	2542318	277396	278784	SPBC530.13	SPAC16C9.05	lsc1	cph1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.111756827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767880	2540879	2541527	277396	278027	SPBC530.13	SPAC31A2.09c	lsc1	apm4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.418878574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767881	2540879	2543426	277396	279846	SPBC530.13	SPAC631.02	lsc1	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.486235869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767882	2540879	2540825	277396	277343	SPBC530.13	SPBC428.08c	lsc1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.773992062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767883	2540879	2542331	277396	278797	SPBC530.13	SPAC1834.05	lsc1	alg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.583850188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767884	2540879	2543573	277396	279988	SPBC530.13	SPAC869.11	lsc1	cat1	-	SPAC922.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933818116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767885	2540879	2539023	277396	275596	SPBC530.13	SPCC594.05c	lsc1	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.114716727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767886	2540879	2543349	277396	279771	SPBC530.13	SPAC977.02	lsc1	SPAC977.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.312365009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767887	2540879	2541160	277396	277675	SPBC530.13	SPBC725.09c	lsc1	hob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.013637515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767888	2540879	2542776	277396	279225	SPBC530.13	SPAC167.01	lsc1	ire1	-	ppk4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.847170663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767889	2540879	2543412	277396	279834	SPBC530.13	SPAC637.07	lsc1	moe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.481042202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767890	2540879	2539898	277396	276444	SPBC530.13	SPBC12D12.07c	lsc1	trx2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.840129727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767891	2540879	2541889	277396	278379	SPBC530.13	SPAC2F7.03c	lsc1	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.441957648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767892	2540879	2541578	277396	278075	SPBC530.13	SPAC25B8.05	lsc1	deg1	-	SPAC25B8.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.276344203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767893	2540879	2541876	277396	278366	SPBC530.13	SPAP27G11.11c	lsc1	SPAP27G11.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.793377675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767894	2540879	2539689	277396	276244	SPBC530.13	SPBC1861.03	lsc1	mak10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.80697597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767895	2540879	2543643	277396	280057	SPBC530.13	SPAC3G9.07c	lsc1	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509625453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767896	2540879	2541899	277396	278389	SPBC530.13	SPAC22E12.11c	lsc1	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.346019302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767897	2540879	2540086	277396	276624	SPBC530.13	SPBC16H5.12c	lsc1	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.99354853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767898	2540879	2541710	277396	278205	SPBC530.13	SPAC343.11c	lsc1	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.566460502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767899	2540879	2539667	277396	276222	SPBC530.13	SPBC13G1.08c	lsc1	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.787023547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767900	2540879	2543253	277396	279681	SPBC530.13	SPAC8C9.05	lsc1	SPAC8C9.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03380999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767901	2540879	2541903	277396	278393	SPBC530.13	SPAC22F8.05	lsc1	SPAC22F8.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.883082861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767902	2540879	2543378	277396	279800	SPBC530.13	SPAC3H8.07c	lsc1	pac10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852615817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767903	2540879	2543683	277396	280097	SPBC530.13	SPAPB1E7.04c	lsc1	SPAPB1E7.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.801828345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767904	2540879	2542439	277396	278901	SPBC530.13	SPAC17A5.08	lsc1	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.845472395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767905	2540879	2541694	277396	278190	SPBC530.13	SPAC1071.04c	lsc1	spc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.970443264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767906	2540879	2541536	277396	278036	SPBC530.13	SPAC1071.02	lsc1	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.485916137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767907	2540879	2541053	277396	277568	SPBC530.13	SPBC56F2.10c	lsc1	alg5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.613291187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767908	2540879	2542597	277396	279051	SPBC530.13	SPAP8A3.07c	lsc1	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.157553673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767909	2540879	2542267	277396	278736	SPBC530.13	SPAPYUK71.03c	lsc1	syn1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870802257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767910	2540879	2540882	277396	277399	SPBC530.13	SPBC4F6.08c	lsc1	mrpl39	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.349791243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767911	2540879	2539527	277396	276089	SPBC530.13	SPCC338.16	lsc1	pof3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.912226142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767912	2540879	2542453	277396	278914	SPBC530.13	SPAC186.01	lsc1	pfl9	-	SPAC186.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.823269686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767913	2540879	2538848	277396	275429	SPBC530.13	SPCC613.12c	lsc1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.467835749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767914	2540879	2542869	277396	279314	SPBC530.13	SPAC140.02	lsc1	gar2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.13067741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767915	2540879	2542170	277396	278645	SPBC530.13	SPAC17G8.13c	lsc1	mst2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.301981856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767916	2540879	2539706	277396	276259	SPBC530.13	SPBC16G5.13	lsc1	ptf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439228637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767917	2540879	2543628	277396	280042	SPBC530.13	SPAC3H8.10	lsc1	spo20	-	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.135425237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767918	2540879	2539555	277396	276116	SPBC530.13	SPCC4B3.08	lsc1	lsg1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.415533256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767919	2540879	2542881	277396	279326	SPBC530.13	SPAC13F5.03c	lsc1	gld1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035673622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767920	2540879	2540800	277396	277319	SPBC530.13	SPBC409.20c	lsc1	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700954221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767921	2540879	2543662	277396	280076	SPBC530.13	SPAC9.07c	lsc1	SPAC9.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813961213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767922	2540879	2541531	277396	278031	SPBC530.13	SPAC25A8.01c	lsc1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.709468511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767923	2540879	2541470	277396	277972	SPBC530.13	SPAPYUG7.04c	lsc1	rpb9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.425519381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767924	2540879	2540699	277396	277223	SPBC530.13	SPBC800.08	lsc1	gcd10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64607059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767925	2540879	2543329	277396	279752	SPBC530.13	SPAC56F8.02	lsc1	SPAC56F8.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.951788258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767926	2540879	2542222	277396	278695	SPBC530.13	SPAC31G5.18c	lsc1	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.070741007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767927	2540879	2539668	277396	276223	SPBC530.13	SPBC11B10.10c	lsc1	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.711647889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767928	2540879	2540516	277396	277044	SPBC530.13	SPBC21C3.01c	lsc1	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.414848367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767929	2540879	2543420	277396	279842	SPBC530.13	SPAC3H1.04c	lsc1	mdm31	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.843501841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767930	2540879	2540380	277396	276909	SPBC530.13	SPBC1A4.05	lsc1	blt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.024622556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767931	2540879	2539189	277396	275760	SPBC530.13	SPCC1682.16	lsc1	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.025089531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767932	2540879	2539253	277396	275823	SPBC530.13	SPCC1827.03c	lsc1	SPCC1827.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.078450455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767933	2540879	2539169	277396	275740	SPBC530.13	SPCC1235.11	lsc1	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.78894305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767934	2540879	2541675	277396	278171	SPBC530.13	SPAC22F8.12c	lsc1	shf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.747677141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767935	2540879	2543327	277396	279750	SPBC530.13	SPAC1D4.06c	lsc1	csk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.221357249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767936	2540879	2541478	277396	277980	SPBC530.13	SPAC2F7.17	lsc1	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.491915462	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767937	2540879	2543372	277396	279794	SPBC530.13	SPAPB1A10.09	lsc1	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.261328125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767938	2540879	2543090	277396	279523	SPBC530.13	SPBC1348.01	lsc1	SPBC1348.01	-	SPAC1348.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.182828779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767939	2540879	2543624	277396	280038	SPBC530.13	SPAC4D7.06c	lsc1	SPAC4D7.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.177368007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767940	2541762	2542378	278256	278842	SPAC139.01c	SPAC1805.04	SPAC139.01c	nup132	SPAC955.02c	Nup133b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.93684182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767941	2541762	2540491	278256	277019	SPAC139.01c	SPBC28E12.04	SPAC139.01c	SPBC28E12.04	SPAC955.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454590578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767942	2541762	2539420	278256	275985	SPAC139.01c	SPCC970.07c	SPAC139.01c	raf2	SPAC955.02c	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81216458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767943	2541762	2543111	278256	279543	SPAC139.01c	SPAC806.07	SPAC139.01c	ndk1	SPAC955.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.456982137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767944	2541762	3361381	278256	280457	SPAC139.01c	SPAC12G12.01c	SPAC139.01c	SPAC12G12.01c	SPAC955.02c	SPAC630.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389762249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767945	2541762	2539845	278256	276393	SPAC139.01c	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC139.01c	ste20	SPAC955.02c	ste16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.308314716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767946	2541762	2540352	278256	276881	SPAC139.01c	SPBC215.03c	SPAC139.01c	csn1	SPAC955.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.843580338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767947	2541762	2543381	278256	279803	SPAC139.01c	SPAC630.09c	SPAC139.01c	mug58	SPAC955.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.787038278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767948	2541762	2543304	278256	279728	SPAC139.01c	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC139.01c	tom70	SPAC955.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.615651273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767949	2541762	2542094	278256	278571	SPAC139.01c	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC139.01c	rcd1	SPAC955.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.627179771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767950	2541762	2540787	278256	277306	SPAC139.01c	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC139.01c	sgf29	SPAC955.02c	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.079975992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767951	2540514	2543529	277042	279947	SPBC19F5.02c	SPAC4C5.02c	utp4	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.326600339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767952	2540514	2539165	277042	275736	SPBC19F5.02c	SPCC1281.04	utp4	SPCC1281.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872721741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767953	2540514	2543563	277042	279979	SPBC19F5.02c	SPAC664.02c	utp4	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319722536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767954	2540514	2539168	277042	275739	SPBC19F5.02c	SPCC1620.08	utp4	SPCC1620.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.845624972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767955	2540514	2542424	277042	278886	SPBC19F5.02c	SPAC1805.14	utp4	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099528556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767956	2540514	2540787	277042	277306	SPBC19F5.02c	SPBC1921.07c	utp4	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636022862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767957	2542111	2543339	278587	279762	SPAC1687.14c	SPAC630.13c	SPAC1687.14c	tsc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64354056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767958	2542111	2542555	278587	279012	SPAC1687.14c	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC1687.14c	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.303981825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767959	2542111	2542023	278587	278506	SPAC1687.14c	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC1687.14c	ufd2	-	SPAC145.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.9367517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767960	2542111	2541522	278587	278023	SPAC1687.14c	SPAC23E2.01	SPAC1687.14c	fep1	-	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992955018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767961	2542111	2539995	278587	276539	SPAC1687.14c	SPBC1105.09	SPAC1687.14c	ubc15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.940907229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767962	2542111	2539815	278587	276365	SPAC1687.14c	SPBC1105.02c	SPAC1687.14c	lys4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.906799083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767963	2542111	2541900	278587	278390	SPAC1687.14c	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC1687.14c	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.847528631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767964	2542111	2542867	278587	279312	SPAC1687.14c	SPAC343.16	SPAC1687.14c	lys2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.837578313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767965	2542111	2543275	278587	279703	SPAC1687.14c	SPAC1002.05c	SPAC1687.14c	jmj2	-	kdm5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.122370348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767966	2542111	2541789	278587	278281	SPAC1687.14c	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC1687.14c	iwr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.178861406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767967	2542111	2542716	278587	279169	SPAC1687.14c	SPAC25H1.07	SPAC1687.14c	emc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63770934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767968	2542111	2542094	278587	278571	SPAC1687.14c	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC1687.14c	rcd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0398262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767969	2542111	2542551	278587	279008	SPAC1687.14c	SPAC1952.17c	SPAC1687.14c	SPAC1952.17c	-	SPAC890.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.55952612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767970	3361036	2539050	280112	275623	SPCC320.13c	SPCC11E10.08	ark1	rik1	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.752450606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767971	3361036	2543529	280112	279947	SPCC320.13c	SPAC4C5.02c	ark1	ryh1	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709859754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767972	3361036	2540975	280112	277491	SPCC320.13c	SPBC354.12	ark1	gpd3	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.963321539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767973	3361036	2539420	280112	275985	SPCC320.13c	SPCC970.07c	ark1	raf2	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.85006538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767974	3361036	2540220	280112	276753	SPCC320.13c	SPBC337.03	ark1	rhn1	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.301455761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767975	3361036	2540825	280112	277343	SPCC320.13c	SPBC428.08c	ark1	clr4	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.111208988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767976	3361036	2542254	280112	278724	SPCC320.13c	SPAC30D11.04c	ark1	nup124	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.46715195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767977	3361036	2540531	280112	277059	SPCC320.13c	SPBC23E6.08	ark1	sat1	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913672294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767978	3361036	2542635	280112	279089	SPCC320.13c	SPAC24H6.09	ark1	gef1	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.871023393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767979	3361036	2543387	280112	279809	SPCC320.13c	SPAPB1E7.02c	ark1	mcl1	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.945903909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767980	3361036	2543372	280112	279794	SPCC320.13c	SPAPB1A10.09	ark1	ase1	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.694981108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767981	2542273	2539774	278742	276325	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC17A3.10	SPAC17H9.13c	pas4	-	pi036	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.077682559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767982	2542273	2539050	278742	275623	SPAC17H9.13c	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC17H9.13c	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.70445295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767983	2542273	2538961	278742	275535	SPAC17H9.13c	SPCC285.14	SPAC17H9.13c	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388401842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767984	2542273	2543637	278742	280051	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC3H8.02	SPAC17H9.13c	csr102	-	SPAC3H8.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865718969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767985	2542273	2541570	278742	278067	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC6G9.09c	SPAC17H9.13c	rpl2401	-	rpl24|rpl24-01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701389125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767986	2542273	2543291	278742	279716	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC9E9.04	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC9E9.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922363663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767987	2542273	2543339	278742	279762	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC630.13c	SPAC17H9.13c	tsc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.377807498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767988	2542273	2542502	278742	278960	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC139.06	SPAC17H9.13c	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.684399839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767989	2542273	2541345	278742	277856	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBP35G2.07	SPAC17H9.13c	ilv1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094475919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767990	2542273	2539263	278742	275833	SPAC17H9.13c	SPCC895.09c	SPAC17H9.13c	ucp12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814714216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767991	2542273	2540717	278742	277240	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC577.12	SPAC17H9.13c	dph6	-	mug71	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992596498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767992	2542273	2540491	278742	277019	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC28E12.04	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.057005601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767993	2542273	2540664	278742	277189	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC215.02	SPAC17H9.13c	bob1	-	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.894568334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767994	2542273	2539226	278742	275796	SPAC17H9.13c	SPCC16C4.20c	SPAC17H9.13c	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633810545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767995	2542273	2543658	278742	280072	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC644.09	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC644.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.311670516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767996	2542273	2542107	278742	278583	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC30.01c	SPAC17H9.13c	sec72	-	sec7b|sec702	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.615827484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767997	2542273	2541013	278742	277528	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC17H9.13c	far10	-	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.017086799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767998	2542273	2539443	278742	276006	SPAC17H9.13c	SPCC736.02	SPAC17H9.13c	SPCC736.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44161407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
767999	2542273	2538775	278742	275357	SPAC17H9.13c	SPCC23B6.05c	SPAC17H9.13c	ssb3	-	rpa3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.852416721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768000	2542273	2538801	278742	275382	SPAC17H9.13c	SPCC285.13c	SPAC17H9.13c	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.252440558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768001	2542273	2542689	278742	279142	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC29B12.04	SPAC17H9.13c	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.028803031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768002	2542273	2539606	278742	276164	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC15D4.05	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC15D4.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819916536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768003	2542273	2540306	278742	276836	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC17H9.13c	ckb2	-	SPBC2G5.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.170869244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768004	2542273	2539434	278742	275997	SPAC17H9.13c	SPCC757.09c	SPAC17H9.13c	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.29923149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768005	2542273	2543453	278742	279873	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC3G9.03	SPAC17H9.13c	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.379423888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768006	2542273	2540727	278742	277250	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC1921.03c	SPAC17H9.13c	mex67	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.135002457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768007	2542273	2540595	278742	277121	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC21C3.02c	SPAC17H9.13c	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773297711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768008	2542273	2539175	278742	275746	SPAC17H9.13c	SPCC16C4.01	SPAC17H9.13c	sif2	-	SPCC5E4.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.382652199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768009	2542273	2540263	278742	276794	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC32H8.02c	SPAC17H9.13c	nep2	-	mug120|pi021|SPACTOKYO_453.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.806894187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768010	2542273	2540059	278742	276597	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC1198.01	SPAC17H9.13c	fmd2	-	SPBC1198.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816695141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768011	2542273	2541522	278742	278023	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC23E2.01	SPAC17H9.13c	fep1	-	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.873863854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768012	2542273	2543584	278742	279999	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAPB1E7.11c	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.648139011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768013	2542273	2538906	278742	275483	SPAC17H9.13c	SPCC1259.03	SPAC17H9.13c	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.863836035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768014	2542273	2543573	278742	279988	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC869.11	SPAC17H9.13c	cat1	-	SPAC922.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.282085916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768015	2542273	2541544	278742	278044	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC22G7.06c	SPAC17H9.13c	ura1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.705784649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768016	2542273	2542950	278742	279390	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC12B10.03	SPAC17H9.13c	bun62	-	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.141572549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768017	2542273	2541801	278742	278292	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC17H9.13c	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.858994739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768018	2542273	2541250	278742	277764	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC8D2.17	SPAC17H9.13c	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.197847812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768019	2542273	2540647	278742	277172	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC18H10.07	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC18H10.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04781045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768020	2542273	2541160	278742	277675	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC725.09c	SPAC17H9.13c	hob3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045949373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768021	2542273	2540348	278742	276877	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC17H9.13c	exo1	-	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.014375362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768022	2542273	2539898	278742	276444	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC12D12.07c	SPAC17H9.13c	trx2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.500010774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768023	2542273	2541889	278742	278379	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC17H9.13c	pom1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.250670173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768024	2542273	2541183	278742	277697	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC725.14	SPAC17H9.13c	arg6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.997187995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768025	2542273	2539689	278742	276244	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC1861.03	SPAC17H9.13c	mak10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.546474554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768026	2542273	2542357	278742	278822	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC1782.07	SPAC17H9.13c	qcr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633178424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768027	2542273	2543643	278742	280057	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC17H9.13c	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.536659867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768028	2542273	2540801	278742	277320	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC18H10.10c	SPAC17H9.13c	saf4	-	cwc16|cwf16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.465796172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768029	2542273	2540665	278742	277190	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC83.02c	SPAC17H9.13c	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.843508281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768030	2542273	2540997	278742	277513	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC17H9.13c	pof9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.008220517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768031	2542273	2540265	278742	276796	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC3E7.12c	SPAC17H9.13c	cfh4	-	chr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640349019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768032	2542273	2538945	278742	275519	SPAC17H9.13c	SPCC1739.06c	SPAC17H9.13c	SPCC1739.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.400716812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768033	2542273	2542946	278742	279386	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC6F12.03c	SPAC17H9.13c	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.805820617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768034	2542273	2540751	278742	277273	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC17H9.13c	psl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.531009776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768035	2542273	2541241	278742	277755	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC887.17	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC887.17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984225311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768036	2542273	2540201	278742	276734	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC13A2.04c	SPAC17H9.13c	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.384149005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768037	2542273	2541464	278742	277966	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC222.08c	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.975027446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768038	2542273	2540967	278742	277483	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0462134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768039	2542273	2542267	278742	278736	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAPYUK71.03c	SPAC17H9.13c	syn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328982825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768040	2542273	2540599	278742	277125	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC29A3.10c	SPAC17H9.13c	atp14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923411354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768041	2542273	2541680	278742	278176	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC22F8.09	SPAC17H9.13c	rrp16	-	nop53	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.054222591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768042	2542273	2540357	278742	276886	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC2F12.05c	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC2F12.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19735203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768043	2542273	2538884	278742	275462	SPAC17H9.13c	SPCC1393.08	SPAC17H9.13c	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.850669116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768044	2542273	2539421	278742	275986	SPAC17H9.13c	SPCC794.11c	SPAC17H9.13c	ent3	-	SPCC794.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099964118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768045	2542273	2539812	278742	276362	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC1347.02	SPAC17H9.13c	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.054216139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768046	2542273	2540930	278742	277446	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC354.10	SPAC17H9.13c	def1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81272452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768047	2542273	2539519	278742	276081	SPAC17H9.13c	SPCC364.05	SPAC17H9.13c	vps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.338958192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768048	2542273	2541713	278742	278208	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC17H9.13c	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819205292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768049	2542273	2539538	278742	276100	SPAC17H9.13c	SPCC364.06	SPAC17H9.13c	nap1	-	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.209278336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768050	2542273	2539499	278742	276062	SPAC17H9.13c	SPCC622.08c	SPAC17H9.13c	hta1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.348047114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768051	2542273	2539809	278742	276359	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC16E9.02c	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC16E9.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.144617542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768052	2542273	2541175	278742	277689	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC839.13c	SPAC17H9.13c	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.719096707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768053	2542273	2540881	278742	277398	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC577.14c	SPAC17H9.13c	spa1	-	spa	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.054766094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768054	2542273	2539246	278742	275816	SPAC17H9.13c	SPCC18.13	SPAC17H9.13c	SPCC18.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.255387199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768055	2542273	2542940	278742	279381	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC31A2.12	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC31A2.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.13093264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768056	2542273	2543160	278742	279591	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC31A2.14	SPAC17H9.13c	bun107	-	wdr48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.756110424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768057	2542273	2541432	278742	277937	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC1F5.05c	SPAC17H9.13c	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041097481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768058	2542273	2543368	278742	279790	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC630.06c	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC630.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329844752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768059	2542273	2540346	278742	276875	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC17H9.13c	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.942450758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768060	2542273	2539013	278742	275586	SPAC17H9.13c	SPCC364.03	SPAC17H9.13c	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.680903908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768061	2542273	2540523	278742	277051	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC29A10.10c	SPAC17H9.13c	dbl8	-	SPBC29A10.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633479988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768062	2542273	2543091	278742	279524	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC12G12.15	SPAC17H9.13c	sif3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.702715694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768063	2542273	2543649	278742	280063	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC3H5.11	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC3H5.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818232355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768064	2542273	2540555	278742	277082	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC17H9.13c	mcs2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992593657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768065	2542273	2539928	278742	276472	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC17H9.13c	imp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867190965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768066	2542273	2539702	278742	276255	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC1604.12	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC1604.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038183814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768067	2542273	2539170	278742	275741	SPAC17H9.13c	SPCC306.02c	SPAC17H9.13c	SPCC306.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568652746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768068	2542273	2539726	278742	276278	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC13E7.08c	SPAC17H9.13c	leo1	-	SPBC13E7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.496197041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768069	2542273	2539920	278742	276464	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC119.08	SPAC17H9.13c	pmk1	-	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.303201198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768070	2542273	2539189	278742	275760	SPAC17H9.13c	SPCC1682.16	SPAC17H9.13c	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979753171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768071	2542273	2539178	278742	275749	SPAC17H9.13c	SPCC1682.14	SPAC17H9.13c	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.477718548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768072	2542273	2543337	278742	279760	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC959.08	SPAC17H9.13c	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.844637743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768073	2542273	2541806	278742	278297	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC17H9.13c	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.040179226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768074	2542273	2540409	278742	276937	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC2D10.11c	SPAC17H9.13c	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.555680336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768075	2542273	2543327	278742	279750	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC1D4.06c	SPAC17H9.13c	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.805710615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768076	2542273	2543471	278742	279891	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC513.07	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC513.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.352585675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768077	2542273	2540173	278742	276706	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC106.13	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC106.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.938414558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768078	2542273	2542175	278742	278650	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC17H9.13c	mkh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.870241069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768079	2542273	2540360	278742	276889	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC2G5.01	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC2G5.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.444247919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768080	2542273	2541375	278742	277886	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBP8B7.31	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBP8B7.31	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.888009344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768081	2542273	2543448	278742	279868	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC3H5.07	SPAC17H9.13c	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.162519734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768082	2542273	2541272	278742	277786	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC947.03c	SPAC17H9.13c	naa38	-	mak31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.439888595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768083	2541320	2542207	277832	278682	SPBC1271.03c	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC1271.03c	ddb1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.292351967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768084	2541320	2542277	277832	278746	SPBC1271.03c	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC1271.03c	dbr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987329067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768085	2541320	2542469	277832	278930	SPBC1271.03c	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC1271.03c	erg5	-	cyp61	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.918779467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768086	2541320	2543313	277832	279737	SPBC1271.03c	SPAPJ691.03	SPBC1271.03c	SPAPJ691.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815990009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768087	2541320	2541096	277832	277611	SPBC1271.03c	SPBC725.10	SPBC1271.03c	SPBC725.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864807461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768088	2541320	2541900	277832	278390	SPBC1271.03c	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC1271.03c	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514552022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768089	2541320	2541488	277832	277990	SPBC1271.03c	SPAC227.17c	SPBC1271.03c	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044875498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768090	2541320	2539538	277832	276100	SPBC1271.03c	SPCC364.06	SPBC1271.03c	nap1	-	nap11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.94327687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768091	2541320	2539925	277832	276469	SPBC1271.03c	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC1271.03c	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.35845817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768092	2541320	2543304	277832	279728	SPBC1271.03c	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1271.03c	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.550327618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768093	2541320	2541531	277832	278031	SPBC1271.03c	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1271.03c	fft3	-	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.278548535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768094	2541320	2543337	277832	279760	SPBC1271.03c	SPAC959.08	SPBC1271.03c	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.768788795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768095	2541320	2538730	277832	275314	SPBC1271.03c	SPCC31H12.02c	SPBC1271.03c	mug73	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.871143057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768096	2541461	2540491	277963	277019	SPAC1F3.09	SPBC28E12.04	mug161	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514529957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768097	2541461	2539603	277963	276161	SPAC1F3.09	SPBC1289.06c	mug161	ppr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.838809494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768098	2541346	2538939	277857	275514	SPBP8B7.08c	SPCC1672.04c	ppm1	SPCC1672.04c	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.482537457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768099	2541346	2539034	277857	275607	SPBP8B7.08c	SPCC830.10	ppm1	ham1	SPBP8B7.08c	SPCC830.10	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934618148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768100	2541346	2542577	277857	279033	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC19G12.15c	ppm1	tpp1	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.196612818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768101	2541346	2540105	277857	276642	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC106.04	ppm1	ada1	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.430781405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768102	2541346	2540913	277857	277429	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC56F2.08c	ppm1	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581653167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768103	2541346	2541912	277857	278402	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC222.16c	ppm1	csn3	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC821.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.167397114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768104	2541346	2538977	277857	275551	SPBP8B7.08c	SPCC1020.06c	ppm1	tal1	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.378222338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768105	2541346	2542706	277857	279159	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC29B12.13	ppm1	SPAC29B12.13	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81022191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768106	2541346	2543064	277857	279497	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC3G6.01	ppm1	hrp3	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.325809809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768107	2541346	2539930	277857	276474	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC1198.11c	ppm1	reb1	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.519714006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768108	2541346	2540296	277857	276827	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC2D10.05	ppm1	exg3	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641795057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768109	2541346	2541188	277857	277702	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC83.16c	ppm1	SPBC83.16c	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.839091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768110	2541346	2543527	277857	279945	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC4C5.01	ppm1	SPAC4C5.01	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.823117588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768111	2541346	2540686	277857	277211	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC21D10.10	ppm1	bdc1	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.44419313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768112	2541346	2540717	277857	277240	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC577.12	ppm1	dph6	SPBP8B7.08c	mug71	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.83309467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768113	2541346	3361375	277857	280451	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC212.06c	ppm1	SPAC212.06c	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51612133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768114	2541346	2542035	277857	278517	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAP8A3.04c	ppm1	hsp9	SPBP8B7.08c	scf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.383010283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768115	2541346	2540975	277857	277491	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC354.12	ppm1	gpd3	SPBP8B7.08c	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.468846904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768116	2541346	2540560	277857	277087	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC2D10.14c	ppm1	myo51	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.968090341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768117	2541346	2542563	277857	279019	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC1952.11c	ppm1	ure2	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262025546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768118	2541346	2542816	277857	279263	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC4G8.11c	ppm1	atp10	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.916781807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768119	2541346	2539564	277857	276125	SPBP8B7.08c	SPCC550.12	ppm1	arp6	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.557970086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768120	2541346	2543681	277857	280095	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC9.02c	ppm1	SPAC9.02c	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.326179335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768121	2541346	2542696	277857	279149	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC29B12.03	ppm1	spd1	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389580836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768122	2541346	2540919	277857	277435	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC543.07	ppm1	pek1	SPBP8B7.08c	mkk1|skh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984139005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768123	2541346	2540306	277857	276836	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC2G5.02c	ppm1	ckb2	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC2G5.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.722787508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768124	2541346	3361385	277857	280461	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC1639.02c	ppm1	trk2	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC1F5.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035853289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768125	2541346	2540463	277857	276991	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC2F12.15c	ppm1	pfa3	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.710127356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768126	2541346	2540993	277857	277509	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC342.01c	ppm1	alg6	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC3F6.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.557039485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768127	2541346	2541323	277857	277835	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBP35G2.14	ppm1	SPBP35G2.14	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645455054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768128	2541346	2542277	277857	278746	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC17A5.02c	ppm1	dbr1	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.686621809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768129	2541346	2538906	277857	275483	SPBP8B7.08c	SPCC1259.03	ppm1	rpa12	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.098441875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768130	2541346	2542791	277857	279240	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC167.04	ppm1	pam17	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.984477342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768131	2541346	2540340	277857	276869	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC2D10.15c	ppm1	pth1	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447716107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768132	2541346	2542311	277857	278777	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC16A10.05c	ppm1	dad1	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.825099886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768133	2541346	2543020	277857	279456	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC10F6.13c	ppm1	SPAC10F6.13c	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927702989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768134	2541346	2539003	277857	275577	SPBP8B7.08c	SPCC1442.17c	ppm1	ist1	SPBP8B7.08c	SPCC285.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.92529069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768135	2541346	2540797	277857	277316	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC18H10.11c	ppm1	ppr2	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.014940996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768136	2541346	2542499	277857	278958	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC1F12.04c	ppm1	SPAC1F12.04c	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147758394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768137	2541346	2542513	277857	278971	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC1952.05	ppm1	gcn5	SPBP8B7.08c	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.216272046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768138	2541346	2541776	277857	278270	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC23H3.05c	ppm1	swd1	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567344683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768139	2541346	2541192	277857	277706	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC83.17	ppm1	SPBC83.17	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195838133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768140	2541346	2541578	277857	278075	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC25B8.05	ppm1	deg1	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC25B8.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.028935228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768141	2541346	2543245	277857	279673	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC56F8.06c	ppm1	alg10	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.565717253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768142	2541346	2540831	277857	277349	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC428.02c	ppm1	eca39	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC582.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.204067431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768143	2541346	2540326	277857	276856	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC2G5.06c	ppm1	hmt2	SPBP8B7.08c	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.065394399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768144	2541346	2542126	277857	278602	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC1B3.05	ppm1	not3	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.205281683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768145	2541346	2540997	277857	277513	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC3H7.06c	ppm1	pof9	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512515722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768146	2541346	2540290	277857	276821	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC29A3.02c	ppm1	his7	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318411137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768147	2541346	2539974	277857	276518	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC32H8.07	ppm1	git5	SPBP8B7.08c	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.631009005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768148	2541346	2542315	277857	278781	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC16C9.01c	ppm1	SPAC16C9.01c	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC4G8.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814453633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768149	2541346	2539324	277857	275890	SPBP8B7.08c	SPCC18.04	ppm1	pof6	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989205714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768150	2541346	2541900	277857	278390	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC23H4.17c	ppm1	srb10	SPBP8B7.08c	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851877748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768151	2541346	2539424	277857	275989	SPBP8B7.08c	SPCC622.19	ppm1	jmj4	SPBP8B7.08c	mug149	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813838833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768152	2541346	2542010	277857	278493	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC20H4.05c	ppm1	SPAC20H4.05c	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.978968058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768153	2541346	2539611	277857	276169	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC1734.09	ppm1	yea4	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC1734.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809738703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768154	2541346	2541142	277857	277657	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC725.04	ppm1	SPBC725.04	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990713503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768155	2541346	2541464	277857	277966	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC222.08c	ppm1	SPAC222.08c	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817516971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768156	2541346	2543307	277857	279731	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC694.05c	ppm1	rps2502	SPBP8B7.08c	rps25|rps25-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.46208215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768157	2541346	2540967	277857	277483	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC36B7.08c	ppm1	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.987800636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768158	2541346	2542597	277857	279051	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAP8A3.07c	ppm1	SPAP8A3.07c	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.924462204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768159	2541346	2541186	277857	277700	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC725.01	ppm1	SPBC725.01	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320410656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768160	2541346	2539059	277857	275632	SPBP8B7.08c	SPCC737.06c	ppm1	SPCC737.06c	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.56906741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768161	2541346	2543390	277857	279812	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC631.01c	ppm1	acp2	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922940626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768162	2541346	2540882	277857	277399	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC4F6.08c	ppm1	mrpl39	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873727066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768163	2541346	2541746	277857	278240	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC20G4.04c	ppm1	hus1	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.562600849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768164	2541346	2543049	277857	279484	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC1296.04	ppm1	mug65	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.144215409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768165	2541346	2540193	277857	276726	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC1289.10c	ppm1	adn2	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049099793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768166	2541346	2542973	277857	279412	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC10F6.04	ppm1	SPAC10F6.04	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511243682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768167	2541346	2540946	277857	277462	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC36.04	ppm1	cys11	SPBP8B7.08c	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319653049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768168	2541346	2542181	277857	278656	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC29E6.05c	ppm1	mxr1	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC29E6.05c|MsrA|SPAC30.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205572801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768169	2541346	2543391	277857	279813	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC4G9.09c	ppm1	arg11	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.408810084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768170	2541346	2542516	277857	278974	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC2F7.04	ppm1	pmc2	SPBP8B7.08c	med1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807650663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768171	2541346	2539137	277857	275709	SPBP8B7.08c	SPCC1682.08c	ppm1	mcp2	SPBP8B7.08c	SPCC1682.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87217471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768172	2541346	2542881	277857	279326	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC13F5.03c	ppm1	gld1	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.998018665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768173	2541346	2539925	277857	276469	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC16H5.13	ppm1	SPBC16H5.13	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.55889453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768174	2541346	2542515	277857	278973	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC1952.09c	ppm1	SPAC1952.09c	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709021608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768175	2541346	2539471	277857	276034	SPBP8B7.08c	SPCC576.14	ppm1	dph5	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.259905427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768176	2541346	2539816	277857	276366	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC12C2.04	ppm1	SPBC12C2.04	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928137591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768177	2541346	2541531	277857	278031	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC25A8.01c	ppm1	fft3	SPBP8B7.08c	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.202424136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768178	2541346	2539013	277857	275586	SPBP8B7.08c	SPCC364.03	ppm1	rpl1702	SPBP8B7.08c	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700346186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768179	2541346	2543046	277857	279481	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC3C7.10	ppm1	pex13	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.287568857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768180	2541346	2542059	277857	278537	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC328.06	ppm1	ubp2	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.123973321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768181	2541346	2541946	277857	278433	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC2G11.04	ppm1	SPAC2G11.04	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.264143072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768182	2541346	2539128	277857	275700	SPBP8B7.08c	SPCC1682.06	ppm1	SPCC1682.06	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.618945614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768183	2541346	2543081	277857	279514	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC30C2.05	ppm1	erv14	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.437827084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768184	2541346	2543610	277857	280024	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC4D7.01c	ppm1	sec71	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAP8A3.15c|sec7a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816249981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768185	2541346	2540481	277857	277009	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC2D10.12	ppm1	rhp23	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387428423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768186	2541346	2542424	277857	278886	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC1805.14	ppm1	SPAC1805.14	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381432329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768187	2541346	2541478	277857	277980	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC2F7.17	ppm1	mrf1	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.721355132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768188	2541346	2543624	277857	280038	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC4D7.06c	ppm1	SPAC4D7.06c	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.487763893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768189	2541346	2542094	277857	278571	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC29B12.06c	ppm1	rcd1	SPBP8B7.08c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.894082608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768190	2539613	2540415	276171	276943	SPBC11C11.11c	SPBC30B4.06c	SPBC11C11.11c	SPBC30B4.06c	SPBC3B8.12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.069708138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768191	2539613	2539870	276171	276416	SPBC11C11.11c	SPBC1709.18	SPBC11C11.11c	tif452	SPBC3B8.12	SPBC409.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699509783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768192	2539613	2543387	276171	279809	SPBC11C11.11c	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC11C11.11c	mcl1	SPBC3B8.12	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507515856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768193	2539613	2542886	276171	279331	SPBC11C11.11c	SPAC1486.01	SPBC11C11.11c	SPAC1486.01	SPBC3B8.12	sod2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045636005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768194	2539908	2539050	276454	275623	SPBC13E7.06	SPCC11E10.08	msd1	rik1	mug172	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.808307522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768195	2539908	2540060	276454	276598	SPBC13E7.06	SPBC106.01	msd1	mph1	mug172	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.331121427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768196	2539908	2540913	276454	277429	SPBC13E7.06	SPBC56F2.08c	msd1	SPBC56F2.08c	mug172	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.475370497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768197	2539908	2542066	276454	278543	SPBC13E7.06	SPAC227.05	msd1	SPAC227.05	mug172	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.899304664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768198	2539908	2542378	276454	278842	SPBC13E7.06	SPAC1805.04	msd1	nup132	mug172	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197470747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768199	2539908	2543524	276454	279942	SPBC13E7.06	SPAC4D7.07c	msd1	csi2	mug172	SPAC4D7.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636093415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768200	2539908	2541633	276454	278129	SPBC13E7.06	SPAC664.01c	msd1	swi6	mug172	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704966531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768201	2539908	2540664	276454	277189	SPBC13E7.06	SPBC215.02	msd1	bob1	mug172	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.03212223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768202	2539908	2539420	276454	275985	SPBC13E7.06	SPCC970.07c	msd1	raf2	mug172	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.407610674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768203	2539908	2539463	276454	276026	SPBC13E7.06	SPCC550.11	msd1	SPCC550.11	mug172	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44044632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768204	2539908	2542555	276454	279012	SPBC13E7.06	SPAC1952.06c	msd1	SPAC1952.06c	mug172	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.844940601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768205	2539908	2542012	276454	278495	SPBC13E7.06	SPAC23C11.02c	msd1	rps23	mug172	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.249228271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768206	2539908	2542318	276454	278784	SPBC13E7.06	SPAC16C9.05	msd1	cph1	mug172	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.47315149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768207	2539908	2541923	276454	278411	SPBC13E7.06	SPAC23C4.09c	msd1	SPAC23C4.09c	mug172	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331399051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768208	2539908	2540825	276454	277343	SPBC13E7.06	SPBC428.08c	msd1	clr4	mug172	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.803251087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768209	2539908	2542311	276454	278777	SPBC13E7.06	SPAC16A10.05c	msd1	dad1	mug172	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.695301806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768210	2539908	2542227	276454	278700	SPBC13E7.06	SPAC5H10.13c	msd1	gmh2	mug172	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.843945447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768211	2539908	2542521	276454	278979	SPBC13E7.06	SPAC18G6.12c	msd1	SPAC18G6.12c	mug172	B22918-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503901685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768212	2539908	2541496	276454	277998	SPBC13E7.06	SPAC23D3.09	msd1	arp42	mug172	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.348865483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768213	2539908	2542126	276454	278602	SPBC13E7.06	SPAC1B3.05	msd1	not3	mug172	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.048246365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768214	2539908	2541451	276454	277956	SPBC13E7.06	SPAC23G3.02c	msd1	sib1	mug172	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979009582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768215	2539908	2539974	276454	276518	SPBC13E7.06	SPBC32H8.07	msd1	git5	mug172	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444079993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768216	2539908	2539232	276454	275802	SPBC13E7.06	SPCC1223.04c	msd1	set11	mug172	mug76	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.816983275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768217	2539908	2543378	276454	279800	SPBC13E7.06	SPAC3H8.07c	msd1	pac10	mug172	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.67533902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768218	2539908	2542597	276454	279051	SPBC13E7.06	SPAP8A3.07c	msd1	SPAP8A3.07c	mug172	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.131831805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768219	2539908	2542773	276454	279222	SPBC13E7.06	SPAC16.01	msd1	rho2	mug172	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099584841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768220	2539908	2541746	276454	278240	SPBC13E7.06	SPAC20G4.04c	msd1	hus1	mug172	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.936949672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768221	2539908	2538848	276454	275429	SPBC13E7.06	SPCC613.12c	msd1	raf1	mug172	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.223253058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768222	2539908	2541017	276454	277532	SPBC13E7.06	SPBC36.07	msd1	elp1	mug172	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388218703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768223	2539908	2543106	276454	279538	SPBC13E7.06	SPAC3A11.13	msd1	SPAC3A11.13	mug172	SPAC3H5.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.743847984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768224	2539908	2540498	276454	277026	SPBC13E7.06	SPBC27.02c	msd1	ask1	mug172	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.90254602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768225	2539908	2542458	276454	278919	SPBC13E7.06	SPAC30.02c	msd1	SPAC30.02c	mug172	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.377881006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768226	2539908	2542418	276454	278881	SPBC13E7.06	SPAC1805.07c	msd1	dad2	mug172	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.475898931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768227	2539908	2539188	276454	275759	SPBC13E7.06	SPCC1827.04	msd1	vms1	mug172	SPCC1827.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867941068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768228	2539908	2541789	276454	278281	SPBC13E7.06	SPAC23H4.08	msd1	iwr1	mug172	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.197971877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768229	2539908	2540936	276454	277452	SPBC13E7.06	SPBC800.05c	msd1	atb2	mug172	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.939883426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768230	2539908	2539928	276454	276472	SPBC13E7.06	SPBC1604.08c	msd1	imp1	mug172	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.419646343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768231	2539908	2539189	276454	275760	SPBC13E7.06	SPCC1682.16	msd1	rpt4	mug172	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.774202341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768232	2539908	2538792	276454	275373	SPBC13E7.06	SPCP1E11.10	msd1	SPCP1E11.10	mug172	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.75380307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768233	2539941	2540415	276485	276943	SPBC13E7.01	SPBC30B4.06c	cwf22	SPBC30B4.06c	SPBC15D4.16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.12388991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768234	2539714	2539774	276267	276325	SPBC1861.07	SPBC17A3.10	SPBC1861.07	pas4	-	pi036	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.460278188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768235	2539714	2541204	276267	277718	SPBC1861.07	SPBC839.06	SPBC1861.07	cta3	-	SPBC24E9.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808513857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768236	2539714	2538961	276267	275535	SPBC1861.07	SPCC285.14	SPBC1861.07	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.875672235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768237	2539714	2542435	276267	278897	SPBC1861.07	SPAC1805.16c	SPBC1861.07	SPAC1805.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101322849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768238	2539714	2543529	276267	279947	SPBC1861.07	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC1861.07	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.997174873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768239	2539714	2543617	276267	280031	SPBC1861.07	SPAC4A8.10	SPBC1861.07	SPAC4A8.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194568501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768240	2539714	2540833	276267	277351	SPBC1861.07	SPBC18H10.20c	SPBC1861.07	any1	-	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319064931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768241	2539714	2543635	276267	280049	SPBC1861.07	SPAC3H8.03	SPBC1861.07	img2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642653522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768242	2539714	2541512	276267	278013	SPBC1861.07	SPAC11E3.08c	SPBC1861.07	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.618480189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768243	2539714	2539452	276267	276015	SPBC1861.07	SPCC70.03c	SPBC1861.07	SPCC70.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035775658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768244	2539714	2538896	276267	275474	SPBC1861.07	SPCC584.11c	SPBC1861.07	SPCC584.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.431826023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768245	2539714	3361561	276267	280637	SPBC1861.07	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC1861.07	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.349221448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768246	2539714	2542149	276267	278625	SPBC1861.07	SPAC57A10.06	SPBC1861.07	mug15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979172501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768247	2539714	2540410	276267	276938	SPBC1861.07	SPBC2D10.04	SPBC1861.07	SPBC2D10.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444063626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768248	2539714	2540296	276267	276827	SPBC1861.07	SPBC2D10.05	SPBC1861.07	exg3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.258693989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768249	2539714	2542502	276267	278960	SPBC1861.07	SPAC139.06	SPBC1861.07	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.976790329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768250	2539714	2540686	276267	277211	SPBC1861.07	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC1861.07	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32844794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768251	2539714	2542701	276267	279154	SPBC1861.07	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC1861.07	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.774178317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768252	2539714	2539420	276267	275985	SPBC1861.07	SPCC970.07c	SPBC1861.07	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.119522944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768253	2539714	2542468	276267	278929	SPBC1861.07	SPAC1D4.09c	SPBC1861.07	rtf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.754089455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768254	2539714	2541012	276267	277527	SPBC1861.07	SPBC3H7.12	SPBC1861.07	rav2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.376380487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768255	2539714	2539510	276267	276072	SPBC1861.07	SPCC4G3.04c	SPBC1861.07	coq5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320028942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768256	2539714	2539564	276267	276125	SPBC1861.07	SPCC550.12	SPBC1861.07	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.886226632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768257	2539714	2539463	276267	276026	SPBC1861.07	SPCC550.11	SPBC1861.07	SPCC550.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935070907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768258	2539714	2542689	276267	279142	SPBC1861.07	SPAC29B12.04	SPBC1861.07	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.507204684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768259	2539714	2543111	276267	279543	SPBC1861.07	SPAC806.07	SPBC1861.07	ndk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641441606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768260	2539714	2543453	276267	279873	SPBC1861.07	SPAC3G9.03	SPBC1861.07	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980820673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768261	2539714	2541964	276267	278450	SPBC1861.07	SPAC2F3.08	SPBC1861.07	sut1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814317875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768262	2539714	2539331	276267	275897	SPBC1861.07	SPCC24B10.09	SPBC1861.07	rps1702	-	rps17|rps17-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455156684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768263	2539714	2540220	276267	276753	SPBC1861.07	SPBC337.03	SPBC1861.07	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.560938093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768264	2539714	2542182	276267	278657	SPBC1861.07	SPAC19B12.08	SPBC1861.07	atg4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447487807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768265	2539714	2539988	276267	276532	SPBC1861.07	SPBC1271.05c	SPBC1861.07	SPBC1271.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.925013671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768266	2539714	2541227	276267	277741	SPBC1861.07	SPBC947.05c	SPBC1861.07	frp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199525272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768267	2539714	2543609	276267	280023	SPBC1861.07	SPAC630.05	SPBC1861.07	gyp7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.267950525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768268	2539714	2541597	276267	278094	SPBC1861.07	SPAC29E6.09	SPBC1861.07	SPAC29E6.09	-	SPAC30.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569889498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768269	2539714	2542082	276267	278559	SPBC1861.07	SPAC29B12.10c	SPBC1861.07	pgt1	-	opt1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.873325385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768270	2539714	2541522	276267	278023	SPBC1861.07	SPAC23E2.01	SPBC1861.07	fep1	-	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.392758553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768271	2539714	2543584	276267	279999	SPBC1861.07	SPAPB1E7.11c	SPBC1861.07	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.564536381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768272	2539714	2542253	276267	278723	SPBC1861.07	SPAC17H9.04c	SPBC1861.07	SPAC17H9.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441016909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768273	2539714	2542981	276267	279419	SPBC1861.07	SPAC824.02	SPBC1861.07	bst1	-	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.117641408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768274	2539714	2541683	276267	278179	SPBC1861.07	SPAC22G7.03	SPBC1861.07	SPAC22G7.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867698467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768275	2539714	2539023	276267	275596	SPBC1861.07	SPCC594.05c	SPBC1861.07	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.839629375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768276	2539714	2539339	276267	275905	SPBC1861.07	SPCC1494.03	SPBC1861.07	arz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990921763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768277	2539714	2541885	276267	278375	SPBC1861.07	SPAC22H10.03c	SPBC1861.07	kap114	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.133114982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768278	2539714	2542695	276267	279148	SPBC1861.07	SPAC12B10.09	SPBC1861.07	pet801	-	SPAC12B10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877713736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768279	2539714	2543020	276267	279456	SPBC1861.07	SPAC10F6.13c	SPBC1861.07	SPAC10F6.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.907400441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768280	2539714	2540797	276267	277316	SPBC1861.07	SPBC18H10.11c	SPBC1861.07	ppr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039529031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768281	2539714	2541801	276267	278292	SPBC1861.07	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC1861.07	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.418664705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768282	2539714	2538715	276267	275299	SPBC1861.07	SPCC1223.05c	SPBC1861.07	rpl3702	-	rpl37|rpl37-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809169167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768283	2539714	2541800	276267	278291	SPBC1861.07	SPAC732.02c	SPBC1861.07	SPAC732.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440927584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768284	2539714	2541776	276267	278270	SPBC1861.07	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC1861.07	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324869643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768285	2539714	2541093	276267	277608	SPBC1861.07	SPBC646.08c	SPBC1861.07	SPBC646.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.837965751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768286	2539714	2541264	276267	277778	SPBC1861.07	SPBC902.06	SPBC1861.07	mto2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807950515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768287	2539714	2539845	276267	276393	SPBC1861.07	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC1861.07	ste20	-	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.41583538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768288	2539714	2543445	276267	279865	SPBC1861.07	SPAC4F10.13c	SPBC1861.07	mpd2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700958883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768289	2539714	2538770	276267	275353	SPBC1861.07	SPCC1753.02c	SPBC1861.07	git3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.138761181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768290	2539714	2542507	276267	278965	SPBC1861.07	SPAC18G6.13	SPBC1861.07	SPAC18G6.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.563451809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768291	2539714	2540673	276267	277198	SPBC1861.07	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC1861.07	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.81334715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768292	2539714	2541658	276267	278154	SPBC1861.07	SPAC25B8.09	SPBC1861.07	SPAC25B8.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.41100485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768293	2539714	2541911	276267	278401	SPBC1861.07	SPAC212.04c	SPBC1861.07	SPAC212.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.977677727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768294	2539714	2542860	276267	279306	SPBC1861.07	SPAC8C9.09c	SPBC1861.07	mug129	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.837947502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768295	2539714	2540452	276267	276980	SPBC1861.07	SPBC2A9.11c	SPBC1861.07	iss9	-	SPBC2A9.11c|SPBC2D10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.086076544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768296	2539714	2543101	276267	279533	SPBC1861.07	SPAC323.03c	SPBC1861.07	SPAC323.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.750594143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768297	2539714	2541532	276267	278032	SPBC1861.07	SPAC2C4.15c	SPBC1861.07	ubx2	-	ucp13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633589055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768298	2539714	2539586	276267	276145	SPBC1861.07	SPCC70.08c	SPBC1861.07	SPCC70.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.345206207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768299	2539714	2541710	276267	278205	SPBC1861.07	SPAC343.11c	SPBC1861.07	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.194507991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768300	2539714	2538769	276267	275352	SPBC1861.07	SPCC126.04c	SPBC1861.07	sgf73	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.128567878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768301	2539714	3361269	276267	280345	SPBC1861.07	SPBC31A8.01c	SPBC1861.07	rtn1	-	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.183183929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768302	2539714	2542126	276267	278602	SPBC1861.07	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC1861.07	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318855755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768303	2539714	2542528	276267	278986	SPBC1861.07	SPAC1B3.08	SPBC1861.07	SPAC1B3.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.875065407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768304	2539714	2540997	276267	277513	SPBC1861.07	SPBC3H7.06c	SPBC1861.07	pof9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.628240992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768305	2539714	2540430	276267	276958	SPBC1861.07	SPBC25B2.01	SPBC1861.07	SPBC25B2.01	-	SPBC2G5.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635024646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768306	2539714	2542710	276267	279163	SPBC1861.07	SPAC750.08c	SPBC1861.07	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.853626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768307	2539714	2540290	276267	276821	SPBC1861.07	SPBC29A3.02c	SPBC1861.07	his7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.987774797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768308	2539714	2539482	276267	276045	SPBC1861.07	SPCC417.06c	SPBC1861.07	mug27	-	ppk35|slk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.610097978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768309	2539714	2539974	276267	276518	SPBC1861.07	SPBC32H8.07	SPBC1861.07	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.54297864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768310	2539714	2541720	276267	278214	SPBC1861.07	SPAC23H3.13c	SPBC1861.07	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258701041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768311	2539714	2543236	276267	279664	SPBC1861.07	SPAC8C9.04	SPBC1861.07	SPAC8C9.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045651143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768312	2539714	2543357	276267	279779	SPBC1861.07	SPAC688.12c	SPBC1861.07	SPAC688.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.192643285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768313	2539714	2542431	276267	278893	SPBC1861.07	SPAC1A6.01c	SPBC1861.07	SPAC1A6.01c	-	SPAC23C4.20c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.334729232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768314	2539714	2542254	276267	278724	SPBC1861.07	SPAC30D11.04c	SPBC1861.07	nup124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.419403752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768315	2539714	2543311	276267	279735	SPBC1861.07	SPAC977.15	SPBC1861.07	SPAC977.15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987278105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768316	2539714	2539408	276267	275973	SPBC1861.07	SPCC576.12c	SPBC1861.07	mhf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.608615499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768317	2539714	2539317	276267	275883	SPBC1861.07	SPCC16A11.08	SPBC1861.07	atg20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517972688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768318	2539714	2541112	276267	277627	SPBC1861.07	SPBC725.07	SPBC1861.07	pex5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.39068726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768319	2539714	2542242	276267	278713	SPBC1861.07	SPAC18G6.04c	SPBC1861.07	shm2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205578971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768320	2539714	2540184	276267	276717	SPBC1861.07	SPBC106.12c	SPBC1861.07	SPBC106.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991104255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768321	2539714	2541337	276267	277848	SPBC1861.07	SPBP35G2.13c	SPBC1861.07	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.057115673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768322	2539714	2539527	276267	276089	SPBC1861.07	SPCC338.16	SPBC1861.07	pof3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.374876403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768323	2539714	2540930	276267	277446	SPBC1861.07	SPBC354.10	SPBC1861.07	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.987739182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768324	2539714	2539519	276267	276081	SPBC1861.07	SPCC364.05	SPBC1861.07	vps3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097904907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768325	2539714	2541628	276267	278124	SPBC1861.07	SPAC110.02	SPBC1861.07	pds5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.229248472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768326	2539714	2539538	276267	276100	SPBC1861.07	SPCC364.06	SPBC1861.07	nap1	-	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.061451153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768327	2539714	2542170	276267	278645	SPBC1861.07	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC1861.07	mst2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451801917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768328	2539714	2542759	276267	279209	SPBC1861.07	SPAC9G1.07	SPBC1861.07	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580118162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768329	2539714	2538762	276267	275345	SPBC1861.07	SPCC306.04c	SPBC1861.07	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.051127727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768330	2539714	2542516	276267	278974	SPBC1861.07	SPAC2F7.04	SPBC1861.07	pmc2	-	med1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768331	2539714	2540809	276267	277328	SPBC1861.07	SPBC18A7.01	SPBC1861.07	SPBC18A7.01	-	SPBC4F6.19c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869635506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768332	2539714	2542327	276267	278793	SPBC1861.07	SPAC16C9.06c	SPBC1861.07	upf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.087649567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768333	2539714	2543670	276267	280084	SPBC1861.07	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC1861.07	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.151226369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768334	2539714	2543674	276267	280088	SPBC1861.07	SPAC637.13c	SPBC1861.07	slm1	-	SPAC637.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814853997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768335	2539714	2539159	276267	275731	SPBC1861.07	SPCC1235.01	SPBC1861.07	SPCC1235.01	-	SPCC320.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814683729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768336	2539714	2542940	276267	279381	SPBC1861.07	SPAC31A2.12	SPBC1861.07	SPAC31A2.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.411419093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768337	2539714	2541103	276267	277618	SPBC1861.07	SPBC651.06	SPBC1861.07	mug166	-	csa1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.976790456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768338	2539714	2540089	276267	276627	SPBC1861.07	SPBC32H8.01c	SPBC1861.07	SPBC32H8.01c	-	SPBP22H7.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036781153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768339	2539714	2542955	276267	279395	SPBC1861.07	SPAC11E3.12	SPBC1861.07	SPAC11E3.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983530797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768340	2539714	2540346	276267	276875	SPBC1861.07	SPBC2F12.03c	SPBC1861.07	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.263434991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768341	2539714	2540325	276267	276855	SPBC1861.07	SPBC21B10.10	SPBC1861.07	rps402	-	rps4-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047156084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768342	2539714	2539772	276267	276323	SPBC1861.07	SPBC1734.05c	SPBC1861.07	spf31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.962286884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768343	2539714	2542222	276267	278695	SPBC1861.07	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC1861.07	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.116712224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768344	2539714	2542727	276267	279177	SPBC1861.07	SPAC26A3.02	SPBC1861.07	myh1	-	myh	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922839624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768345	2539714	2542826	276267	279273	SPBC1861.07	SPAC13G6.09	SPBC1861.07	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091689884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768346	2539714	2539668	276267	276223	SPBC1861.07	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC1861.07	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.402920924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768347	2539714	2541789	276267	278281	SPBC1861.07	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC1861.07	iwr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933664435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768348	2539714	2542250	276267	278720	SPBC1861.07	SPAC17D4.03c	SPBC1861.07	cis4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147437769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768349	2539714	2543044	276267	279479	SPBC1861.07	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC1861.07	tip1	-	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512304231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768350	2539714	2542386	276267	278850	SPBC1861.07	SPAC1805.01c	SPBC1861.07	ppk6	-	SPAPJ736.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868993528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768351	2539714	2539170	276267	275741	SPBC1861.07	SPCC306.02c	SPBC1861.07	SPCC306.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328798537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768352	2539714	2539460	276267	276023	SPBC1861.07	SPCC4B3.13	SPBC1861.07	SPCC4B3.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.268781819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768353	2539714	2542904	276267	279348	SPBC1861.07	SPAC144.11	SPBC1861.07	rps1102	-	rps11|rps11-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045902289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768354	2539714	2540896	276267	277412	SPBC1861.07	SPBC19C2.13c	SPBC1861.07	ctu2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877045301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768355	2539714	2540146	276267	276683	SPBC1861.07	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC1861.07	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.459961595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768356	2539714	2538840	276267	275421	SPBC1861.07	SPCC736.07c	SPBC1861.07	SPCC736.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981141652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768357	2539714	2543486	276267	279906	SPBC1861.07	SPAC959.07	SPBC1861.07	rps403	-	rps4|rps4-3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.505540666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768358	2539714	3361410	276267	280486	SPBC1861.07	SPAC1527.01	SPBC1861.07	mok11	-	SPAC23D3.15	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.120593719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768359	2539714	2542716	276267	279169	SPBC1861.07	SPAC25H1.07	SPBC1861.07	emc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.337511696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768360	2539714	2539181	276267	275752	SPBC1861.07	SPCC622.14	SPBC1861.07	SPCC622.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.915986716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768361	2539714	2541806	276267	278297	SPBC1861.07	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC1861.07	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323429332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768362	2539714	2540409	276267	276937	SPBC1861.07	SPBC2D10.11c	SPBC1861.07	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.688666691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768363	2539714	2540766	276267	277286	SPBC1861.07	SPBC19C2.02	SPBC1861.07	pmt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.39863748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768364	2539714	2538854	276267	275435	SPBC1861.07	SPCP1E11.05c	SPBC1861.07	are2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.684721999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768365	2539714	2539531	276267	276093	SPBC1861.07	SPCC576.02	SPBC1861.07	SPCC576.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.344580713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768366	2539714	2540314	276267	276844	SPBC1861.07	SPBC2G5.03	SPBC1861.07	ctu1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090692728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768367	2539714	2540360	276267	276889	SPBC1861.07	SPBC2G5.01	SPBC1861.07	SPBC2G5.01	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987825551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768368	2539714	2540558	276267	277085	SPBC1861.07	SPBC2D10.17	SPBC1861.07	clr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196862742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768369	2539714	2540093	276267	276631	SPBC1861.07	SPBC115.02c	SPBC1861.07	afg1	-	SPBC115.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983176947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768370	2539714	2542700	276267	279153	SPBC1861.07	SPAC26H5.08c	SPBC1861.07	bgl2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446213875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768371	2539714	2541808	276267	278299	SPBC1861.07	SPAC22A12.14c	SPBC1861.07	SPAC22A12.14c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.464853878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768372	2539714	2543448	276267	279868	SPBC1861.07	SPAC3H5.07	SPBC1861.07	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.505923559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768373	2539714	2538696	276267	275281	SPBC1861.07	SPCC569.06	SPBC1861.07	SPCC569.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32152188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768374	2539714	2540309	276267	276839	SPBC1861.07	SPBC21B10.13c	SPBC1861.07	yox1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.259573916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768375	2539714	2541576	276267	278073	SPBC1861.07	SPBC1348.02	SPBC1861.07	SPBC1348.02	-	SPAC1348.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.262492973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768376	2539714	2540310	276267	276840	SPBC1861.07	SPBC29B5.04c	SPBC1861.07	SPBC29B5.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809161217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768377	2539714	3361512	276267	280588	SPBC1861.07	SPAC3C7.01c	SPBC1861.07	sac12	-	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322771331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768378	2539714	2541062	276267	277577	SPBC1861.07	SPBC660.11	SPBC1861.07	tcg1	-	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.809024475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768379	2539714	2539148	276267	275720	SPBC1861.07	SPCC132.04c	SPBC1861.07	gdh2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516055192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768380	2539714	2538940	276267	275515	SPBC1861.07	SPCC1620.07c	SPBC1861.07	lnp1	-	SPCC1620.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812532641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768381	2539714	2540787	276267	277306	SPBC1861.07	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC1861.07	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.062392698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768382	2539714	2542571	276267	279027	SPBC1861.07	SPAC589.02c	SPBC1861.07	med13	-	spTrap240|srb9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818136897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768383	2540186	2540415	276719	276943	SPBC13E7.02	SPBC30B4.06c	cwf24	SPBC30B4.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.507269173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768384	2540186	2539804	276719	276354	SPBC13E7.02	SPBC1105.11c	cwf24	hht3	-	h3.3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581444692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768385	2540186	2541357	276719	277868	SPBC13E7.02	SPBPB7E8.01	cwf24	SPBPB7E8.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505840453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768386	2542170	2543529	278645	279947	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC4C5.02c	mst2	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.122058095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768387	2542170	2538857	278645	275437	SPAC17G8.13c	SPCC1442.05c	mst2	SPCC1442.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810830008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768388	2542170	2542098	278645	278574	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC30D11.01c	mst2	gto2	-	SPAC30D11.01c|SPAC56F8.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979057102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768389	2542170	2542747	278645	279197	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC15A10.06	mst2	SPAC15A10.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.80749619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768390	2542170	2540694	278645	277218	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC19C7.10	mst2	bqt4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093515686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768391	2542170	2543164	278645	279595	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC3G6.06c	mst2	rad2	-	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.666598762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768392	2542170	2538976	278645	275550	SPAC17G8.13c	SPCC1840.04	mst2	pca1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319179606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768393	2542170	2540999	278645	277515	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC4B4.04	mst2	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.854177775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768394	2542170	2538847	278645	275428	SPAC17G8.13c	SPCC594.06c	mst2	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.333184599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768395	2542170	2542689	278645	279142	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC29B12.04	mst2	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581095649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768396	2542170	2539576	278645	276136	SPAC17G8.13c	SPCC794.01c	mst2	zwf2	-	SPCC794.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816648555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768397	2542170	2542555	278645	279012	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC1952.06c	mst2	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.893570557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768398	2542170	2540929	278645	277445	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC354.03	mst2	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.007610734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768399	2542170	2540595	278645	277121	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC21C3.02c	mst2	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.050791458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768400	2542170	2539023	278645	275596	SPAC17G8.13c	SPCC594.05c	mst2	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.156584737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768401	2542170	2542513	278645	278971	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC1952.05	mst2	gcn5	-	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.878496133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768402	2542170	2539628	278645	276185	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC1604.03c	mst2	SPBC1604.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.774449143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768403	2542170	2540673	278645	277198	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC1D7.03	mst2	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.443017307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768404	2542170	2540150	278645	276687	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC16E9.14c	mst2	zrg17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444211531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768405	2542170	2542971	278645	279410	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC105.02c	mst2	SPAC105.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.772417947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768406	2542170	2541876	278645	278366	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAP27G11.11c	mst2	SPAP27G11.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571837676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768407	2542170	2541496	278645	277998	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC23D3.09	mst2	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.048552898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768408	2542170	2540831	278645	277349	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC428.02c	mst2	eca39	-	SPBC582.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.195531605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768409	2542170	2539667	278645	276222	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC13G1.08c	mst2	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.340247807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768410	2542170	2541903	278645	278393	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC22F8.05	mst2	SPAC22F8.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.124748791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768411	2542170	2539481	278645	276044	SPAC17G8.13c	SPCC622.16c	mst2	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.276585871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768412	2542170	2539953	278645	276497	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC1709.11c	mst2	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.309758762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768413	2542170	2543443	278645	279863	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC3H1.12c	mst2	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573504605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768414	2542170	2542597	278645	279051	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAP8A3.07c	mst2	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.565797099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768415	2542170	2538690	278645	275275	SPAC17G8.13c	SPCC1393.05	mst2	ers1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.157387945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768416	2542170	2538762	278645	275345	SPAC17G8.13c	SPCC306.04c	mst2	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.060158141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768417	2542170	2542327	278645	278793	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC16C9.06c	mst2	upf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778286212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768418	2542170	2540115	278645	276652	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC1778.02	mst2	rap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508569999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768419	2542170	2540629	278645	277155	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC21D10.09c	mst2	rkr1	-	SPBC21D10.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81962618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768420	2542170	2540555	278645	277082	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBP16F5.02	mst2	mcs2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.989524401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768421	2542170	2539205	278645	275775	SPAC17G8.13c	SPCC4B3.15	mst2	mid1	-	dmf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.464309092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768422	2542170	2539920	278645	276464	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC119.08	mst2	pmk1	-	spm1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.88862295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768423	2542170	2539178	278645	275749	SPAC17G8.13c	SPCC1682.14	mst2	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.878387272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768424	2542170	2541238	278645	277752	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC8E4.05c	mst2	SPBC8E4.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512007483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768425	2542170	2540787	278645	277306	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC1921.07c	mst2	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.931773945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768426	2540914	2543529	277430	279947	SPBC56F2.01	SPAC4C5.02c	pof12	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.686813074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768427	2540914	2542747	277430	279197	SPBC56F2.01	SPAC15A10.06	pof12	SPAC15A10.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.685176552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768428	2540914	2539100	277430	275672	SPBC56F2.01	SPCC330.12c	pof12	sdh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.849211242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768429	2540914	2542791	277430	279240	SPBC56F2.01	SPAC167.04	pof12	pam17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391739629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768430	2540914	2541021	277430	277536	SPBC56F2.01	SPBC3B8.10c	pof12	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.502389689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768431	2540914	2542710	277430	279163	SPBC56F2.01	SPAC750.08c	pof12	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.840689049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768432	2540914	2539974	277430	276518	SPBC56F2.01	SPBC32H8.07	pof12	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325814969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768433	2540914	2539481	277430	276044	SPBC56F2.01	SPCC622.16c	pof12	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.908823478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768434	2540914	2542597	277430	279051	SPBC56F2.01	SPAP8A3.07c	pof12	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.70669289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768435	2540914	3361105	277430	280181	SPBC56F2.01	SPCC188.10c	pof12	SPCC188.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571273906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768436	2540914	2538762	277430	275345	SPBC56F2.01	SPCC306.04c	pof12	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.488134307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768437	2540914	2543670	277430	280084	SPBC56F2.01	SPAPB1E7.06c	pof12	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517186346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768438	2540914	2540498	277430	277026	SPBC56F2.01	SPBC27.02c	pof12	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5137366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768439	2540914	2543662	277430	280076	SPBC56F2.01	SPAC9.07c	pof12	SPAC9.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.970677416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768440	2540914	2539471	277430	276034	SPBC56F2.01	SPCC576.14	pof12	dph5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.4416165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768441	2540914	2539668	277430	276223	SPBC56F2.01	SPBC11B10.10c	pof12	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.989632639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768442	2540914	2538792	277430	275373	SPBC56F2.01	SPCP1E11.10	pof12	SPCP1E11.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.044685001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768443	2540072	2538939	276610	275514	SPBC16H5.07c	SPCC1672.04c	ppa2	SPCC1672.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.685466971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768444	2540072	2542577	276610	279033	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC19G12.15c	ppa2	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.850171628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768445	2540072	2541343	276610	277854	SPBC16H5.07c	SPBPB2B2.19c	ppa2	SPBPB2B2.19c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.459550436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768446	2540072	2541512	276610	278013	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC11E3.08c	ppa2	nse6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.463482661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768447	2540072	2543064	276610	279497	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC3G6.01	ppa2	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.189398651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768448	2540072	2542358	276610	278823	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC1782.09c	ppa2	clp1	-	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.552918529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768449	2540072	2542293	276610	278761	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC17G8.14c	ppa2	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.866828264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768450	2540072	2539930	276610	276474	SPBC16H5.07c	SPBC1198.11c	ppa2	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.608125092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768451	2540072	2540068	276610	276606	SPBC16H5.07c	SPBC1734.12c	ppa2	alg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.125382314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768452	2540072	2539944	276610	276488	SPBC16H5.07c	SPBC1198.06c	ppa2	SPBC1198.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778454505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768453	2540072	2540694	276610	277218	SPBC16H5.07c	SPBC19C7.10	ppa2	bqt4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326276754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768454	2540072	2540491	276610	277019	SPBC16H5.07c	SPBC28E12.04	ppa2	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.405746661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768455	2540072	3361436	276610	280512	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC1296.01c	ppa2	SPAC1296.01c	-	SPAC22F3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.58692251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768456	2540072	2539235	276610	275805	SPBC16H5.07c	SPCC1682.15	ppa2	mug122	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.275297363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768457	2540072	2542689	276610	279142	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC29B12.04	ppa2	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.314481687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768458	2540072	2539117	276610	275689	SPBC16H5.07c	SPCC74.06	ppa2	mak3	-	phk2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379563006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768459	2540072	2540929	276610	277445	SPBC16H5.07c	SPBC354.03	ppa2	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.136933655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768460	2540072	2540425	276610	276953	SPBC16H5.07c	SPBC27.06c	ppa2	mgr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.15953179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768461	2540072	2540467	276610	276995	SPBC16H5.07c	SPBC2G2.07c	ppa2	mug178	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.489361161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768462	2540072	2541105	276610	277620	SPBC16H5.07c	SPBC685.02	ppa2	exo5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322145578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768463	2540072	2542981	276610	279419	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC824.02	ppa2	bst1	-	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.69263526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768464	2540072	2539023	276610	275596	SPBC16H5.07c	SPCC594.05c	ppa2	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454278294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768465	2540072	2543020	276610	279456	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC10F6.13c	ppa2	SPAC10F6.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.885019307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768466	2540072	2541250	276610	277764	SPBC16H5.07c	SPBC8D2.17	ppa2	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.087137013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768467	2540072	2542863	276610	279309	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC13G7.04c	ppa2	mac1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.769503986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768468	2540072	2540673	276610	277198	SPBC16H5.07c	SPBC1D7.03	ppa2	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.768919992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768469	2540072	2541889	276610	278379	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC2F7.03c	ppa2	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.991279993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768470	2540072	2540231	276610	276763	SPBC16H5.07c	SPBC336.14c	ppa2	ppk26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509035512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768471	2540072	2543250	276610	279678	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC3G9.15c	ppa2	fcf2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816543881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768472	2540072	2539667	276610	276222	SPBC16H5.07c	SPBC13G1.08c	ppa2	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.552039148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768473	2540072	2541607	276610	278104	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC24B11.10c	ppa2	cfh1	-	chr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.710695959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768474	2540072	2540232	276610	276764	SPBC16H5.07c	SPBC336.10c	ppa2	tif512	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326586801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768475	2540072	2539958	276610	276502	SPBC16H5.07c	SPBC1718.07c	ppa2	zfs1	-	moc4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.018659518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768476	2540072	2542549	276610	279006	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC19A8.11c	ppa2	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0137712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768477	2540072	2542519	276610	278977	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC19G12.08	ppa2	scs7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201710663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768478	2540072	2540019	276610	276563	SPBC16H5.07c	SPBC1685.01	ppa2	pmp1	-	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512180156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768479	2540072	2541053	276610	277568	SPBC16H5.07c	SPBC56F2.10c	ppa2	alg5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979146697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768480	2540072	2543517	276610	279935	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC3G9.05	ppa2	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.94637194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768481	2540072	2541488	276610	277990	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC227.17c	ppa2	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.564453597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768482	2540072	2543254	276610	279682	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC1006.03c	ppa2	red1	-	iss3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512934955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768483	2540072	2543515	276610	279933	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC4F10.14c	ppa2	btf3	-	btt1|egd1|nac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770575637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768484	2540072	2540930	276610	277446	SPBC16H5.07c	SPBC354.10	ppa2	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.332124547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768485	2540072	2542283	276610	278751	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC27F1.08	ppa2	pdt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.009768944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768486	2540072	2541156	276610	277671	SPBC16H5.07c	SPBC685.07c	ppa2	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.931882724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768487	2540072	2538762	276610	275345	SPBC16H5.07c	SPCC306.04c	ppa2	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.377689864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768488	2540072	2543628	276610	280042	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC3H8.10	ppa2	spo20	-	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.114918304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768489	2540072	2543619	276610	280033	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC4F10.04	ppa2	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.144340229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768490	2540072	2539555	276610	276116	SPBC16H5.07c	SPCC4B3.08	ppa2	lsg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.338551457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768491	2540072	2540619	276610	277145	SPBC16H5.07c	SPBC25H2.15	ppa2	SPBC25H2.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.259875189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768492	2540072	2540061	276610	276599	SPBC16H5.07c	SPBC119.12	ppa2	rud3	-	SPBC119.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.810563396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768493	2540072	2539137	276610	275709	SPBC16H5.07c	SPCC1682.08c	ppa2	mcp2	-	SPCC1682.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.824086959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768494	2540072	2541909	276610	278399	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC227.01c	ppa2	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.689747259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768495	2540072	2541371	276610	277882	SPBC16H5.07c	SPBP4H10.17c	ppa2	SPBP4H10.17c	-	mrps2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318313633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768496	2540072	2543160	276610	279591	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC31A2.14	ppa2	bun107	-	wdr48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.991016584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768497	2540072	2541100	276610	277615	SPBC16H5.07c	SPBC651.04	ppa2	SPBC651.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.25920117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768498	2540072	2540115	276610	276652	SPBC16H5.07c	SPBC1778.02	ppa2	rap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2012522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768499	2540072	2541470	276610	277972	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAPYUG7.04c	ppa2	rpb9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452876619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768500	2540072	2542891	276610	279335	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC6F12.12	ppa2	par2	-	pbp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567199783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768501	2540072	2539205	276610	275775	SPBC16H5.07c	SPCC4B3.15	ppa2	mid1	-	dmf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.44807652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768502	2540072	2538840	276610	275421	SPBC16H5.07c	SPCC736.07c	ppa2	SPCC736.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.955193839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768503	2540072	2539189	276610	275760	SPBC16H5.07c	SPCC1682.16	ppa2	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.120281451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768504	2540072	2541675	276610	278171	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC22F8.12c	ppa2	shf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.262706097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768505	2540072	2543384	276610	279806	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC637.06	ppa2	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.638989429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768506	2540072	2543387	276610	279809	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAPB1E7.02c	ppa2	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.25626006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768507	2540072	2541466	276610	277968	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC14C4.06c	ppa2	nab2	-	SPAC14C4.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.500493932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768508	2540072	2540558	276610	277085	SPBC16H5.07c	SPBC2D10.17	ppa2	clr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.561326705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768509	2540072	2542424	276610	278886	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC1805.14	ppa2	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.917098297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768510	2540072	2541869	276610	278359	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC22F3.13	ppa2	tsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45033741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768511	2540072	2538947	276610	275521	SPBC16H5.07c	SPCC1682.12c	ppa2	ubp16	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.25390025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768512	2540072	2540383	276610	276912	SPBC16H5.07c	SPBC31E1.02c	ppa2	pmr1	-	cps5|pgak2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.06347687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768513	2540072	2542094	276610	278571	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC29B12.06c	ppa2	rcd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.138197376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768514	2540072	2542617	276610	279071	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC13A11.01c	ppa2	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.344379801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768515	2540072	2541062	276610	277577	SPBC16H5.07c	SPBC660.11	ppa2	tcg1	-	mug187	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.510260776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768516	2540072	2542879	276610	279324	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC13G7.07	ppa2	arb2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383152282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768517	2540072	2539001	276610	275575	SPBC16H5.07c	SPCC1494.08c	ppa2	SPCC1494.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.65035812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768518	2543339	2539147	279762	275719	SPAC630.13c	SPCC622.12c	tsc2	gdh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.786961746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768519	2543339	2538721	279762	275305	SPAC630.13c	SPCC1494.10	tsc2	adn3	-	SPCC70.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770191572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768520	2543339	2539584	279762	276143	SPAC630.13c	SPCC63.03	tsc2	SPCC63.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.465716285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768521	2543339	2542577	279762	279033	SPAC630.13c	SPAC19G12.15c	tsc2	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.499612991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768522	2543339	2542518	279762	278976	SPAC630.13c	SPAC1B3.16c	tsc2	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.997571807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768523	2543339	2542378	279762	278842	SPAC630.13c	SPAC1805.04	tsc2	nup132	-	Nup133b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.025451312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768524	2543339	2539930	279762	276474	SPAC630.13c	SPBC1198.11c	tsc2	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.66337222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768525	2543339	2541345	279762	277856	SPAC630.13c	SPBP35G2.07	tsc2	ilv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.502964308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768526	2543339	2541771	279762	278265	SPAC630.13c	SPAC23H3.06	tsc2	apl6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.746348116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768527	2543339	2538922	279762	275499	SPAC630.13c	SPCC16C4.10	tsc2	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.428146843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768528	2543339	2540535	279762	277062	SPAC630.13c	SPBC215.01	tsc2	SPBC215.01	-	SPBC3B9.20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.584839191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768529	2543339	2541205	279762	277719	SPAC630.13c	SPBC839.02	tsc2	SPBC839.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.836160715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768530	2543339	2538847	279762	275428	SPAC630.13c	SPCC594.06c	tsc2	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.806555956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768531	2543339	2542273	279762	278742	SPAC630.13c	SPAC17H9.13c	tsc2	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.377807498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768532	2543339	2539564	279762	276125	SPAC630.13c	SPCC550.12	tsc2	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.552413671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768533	2543339	2543681	279762	280095	SPAC630.13c	SPAC9.02c	tsc2	SPAC9.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.648342294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768534	2543339	2541119	279762	277634	SPAC630.13c	SPBC651.11c	tsc2	apm3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.373165267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768535	2543339	2542022	279762	278505	SPAC630.13c	SPAC23A1.03	tsc2	apt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.057714376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768536	2543339	2540425	279762	276953	SPAC630.13c	SPBC27.06c	tsc2	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.38434343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768537	2543339	2539244	279762	275814	SPAC630.13c	SPCC1672.06c	tsc2	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.24478171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768538	2543339	2543563	279762	279979	SPAC630.13c	SPAC664.02c	tsc2	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.906776623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768539	2543339	2540714	279762	277237	SPAC630.13c	SPBC19C2.04c	tsc2	ubp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707586576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768540	2543339	2540964	279762	277480	SPAC630.13c	SPBC365.16	tsc2	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.818538621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768541	2543339	2542665	279762	279118	SPAC630.13c	SPAC10F6.08c	tsc2	nht10	-	nht1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780207236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768542	2543339	2540892	279762	277408	SPAC630.13c	SPBC530.01	tsc2	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.837287914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768543	2543339	2540647	279762	277172	SPAC630.13c	SPBC18H10.07	tsc2	SPBC18H10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.784969115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768544	2543339	2542507	279762	278965	SPAC630.13c	SPAC18G6.13	tsc2	SPAC18G6.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318670913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768545	2543339	2540352	279762	276881	SPAC630.13c	SPBC215.03c	tsc2	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.786538749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768546	2543339	2542168	279762	278643	SPAC630.13c	SPAC17A5.16	tsc2	ftp105	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.283379019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768547	2543339	2541496	279762	277998	SPAC630.13c	SPAC23D3.09	tsc2	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.542787861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768548	2543339	2540831	279762	277349	SPAC630.13c	SPBC428.02c	tsc2	eca39	-	SPBC582.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.81143869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768549	2543339	2542857	279762	279303	SPAC630.13c	SPAC144.06	tsc2	apl5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.259575487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768550	2543339	2542126	279762	278602	SPAC630.13c	SPAC1B3.05	tsc2	not3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.662011473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768551	2543339	2540665	279762	277190	SPAC630.13c	SPBC83.02c	tsc2	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.076317215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768552	2543339	2541241	279762	277755	SPAC630.13c	SPBC887.17	tsc2	SPBC887.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.538260936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768553	2543339	2539958	279762	276502	SPAC630.13c	SPBC1718.07c	tsc2	zfs1	-	moc4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.336353035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768554	2543339	2541389	279762	277900	SPAC630.13c	SPBPB2B2.09c	tsc2	SPBPB2B2.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767280559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768555	2543339	2540201	279762	276734	SPAC630.13c	SPBC13A2.04c	tsc2	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.398737773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768556	2543339	2542597	279762	279051	SPAC630.13c	SPAP8A3.07c	tsc2	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.505875761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768557	2543339	2541283	279762	277796	SPAC630.13c	SPBP8B7.02	tsc2	rng9	-	SPBP8B7.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.915445078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768558	2543339	2541186	279762	277700	SPAC630.13c	SPBC725.01	tsc2	SPBC725.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504461302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768559	2543339	2540533	279762	277061	SPAC630.13c	SPBC29A10.16c	tsc2	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.485778422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768560	2543339	2538884	279762	275462	SPAC630.13c	SPCC1393.08	tsc2	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.402020922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768561	2543339	2540193	279762	276726	SPAC630.13c	SPBC1289.10c	tsc2	adn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572666874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768562	2543339	2542781	279762	279230	SPAC630.13c	SPAC57A10.12c	tsc2	ura3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504138879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768563	2543339	2540930	279762	277446	SPAC630.13c	SPBC354.10	tsc2	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.694798832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768564	2543339	2542875	279762	279320	SPAC630.13c	SPAC13G7.02c	tsc2	ssa1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392578358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768565	2543339	2539499	279762	276062	SPAC630.13c	SPCC622.08c	tsc2	hta1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.903665597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768566	2543339	2538762	279762	275345	SPAC630.13c	SPCC306.04c	tsc2	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.391292842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768567	2543339	2543619	279762	280033	SPAC630.13c	SPAC4F10.04	tsc2	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.496806917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768568	2543339	2540061	279762	276599	SPAC630.13c	SPBC119.12	tsc2	rud3	-	SPBC119.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.507700795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768569	2543339	2540800	279762	277319	SPAC630.13c	SPBC409.20c	tsc2	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.855100383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768570	2543339	2538962	279762	275536	SPAC630.13c	SPCC965.13	tsc2	SPCC965.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.37365947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768571	2543339	2543662	279762	280076	SPAC630.13c	SPAC9.07c	tsc2	SPAC9.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.694191318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768572	2543339	2541531	279762	278031	SPAC630.13c	SPAC25A8.01c	tsc2	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.665966294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768573	2543339	2539668	279762	276223	SPAC630.13c	SPBC11B10.10c	tsc2	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.422416924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768574	2543339	2541404	279762	277913	SPAC630.13c	SPBPB2B2.18	tsc2	SPBPB2B2.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.003754688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768575	2543339	2543516	279762	279934	SPAC630.13c	SPAC4F10.11	tsc2	spn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.086141267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768576	2543339	2543124	279762	279556	SPAC630.13c	SPAC3A11.06	tsc2	mvp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319471297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768577	2543339	2539189	279762	275760	SPAC630.13c	SPCC1682.16	tsc2	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.955704498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768578	2543339	2539169	279762	275740	SPAC630.13c	SPCC1235.11	tsc2	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.872256037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768579	2543339	2538854	279762	275435	SPAC630.13c	SPCP1E11.05c	tsc2	are2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.716515414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768580	2543339	2540481	279762	277009	SPAC630.13c	SPBC2D10.12	tsc2	rhp23	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768581	2543339	2542111	279762	278587	SPAC630.13c	SPAC1687.14c	tsc2	SPAC1687.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64354056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768582	2543339	2542460	279762	278921	SPAC630.13c	SPAC1F12.03c	tsc2	SPAC1F12.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.397025267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768583	2543339	2542094	279762	278571	SPAC630.13c	SPAC29B12.06c	tsc2	rcd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98584521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768584	2543339	2543501	279762	279919	SPAC630.13c	SPAC664.14	tsc2	amt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.586010142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768585	2543339	2540320	279762	276850	SPAC630.13c	SPBC3D6.04c	tsc2	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642600749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768586	2541483	2539451	277985	276014	SPAC227.14	SPCC63.13	SPAC227.14	SPCC63.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045099327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768587	2541483	2541013	277985	277528	SPAC227.14	SPBC3H7.13	SPAC227.14	far10	-	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.121665087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768588	2541483	2542644	277985	279098	SPAC227.14	SPAC24C9.16c	SPAC227.14	cox8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988973187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768589	2541483	2542896	277985	279340	SPAC227.14	SPAC3F10.04	SPAC227.14	gsa1	-	gsh2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81887409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768590	2541483	2541249	277985	277763	SPAC227.14	SPBC947.01	SPAC227.14	alf1	-	SPBC947.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093215488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768591	2541483	2542428	277985	278890	SPAC227.14	SPAC1805.12c	SPAC227.14	uep1	-	ubi2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807518339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768592	2541483	2539958	277985	276502	SPAC227.14	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC227.14	zfs1	-	moc4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870317905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768593	2541483	2542693	277985	279146	SPAC227.14	SPAC27D7.09c	SPAC227.14	SPAC27D7.09c	-	SPAC27D7.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869758756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768594	2541483	2542904	277985	279348	SPAC227.14	SPAC144.11	SPAC227.14	rps1102	-	rps11|rps11-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101166231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768595	2538974	2542598	275548	279052	SPCC550.02c	SPAC6G10.08	cwf5	idp1	ecm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.860220433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768596	2538974	2543426	275548	279846	SPCC550.02c	SPAC631.02	cwf5	bdf2	ecm2	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.495698938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768597	2538974	2542981	275548	279419	SPCC550.02c	SPAC824.02	cwf5	bst1	ecm2	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.991263923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768598	2538974	2539023	275548	275596	SPCC550.02c	SPCC594.05c	cwf5	spf1	ecm2	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.566766619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768599	2538974	2541800	275548	278291	SPCC550.02c	SPAC732.02c	cwf5	SPAC732.02c	ecm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.337974365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768600	2538974	2541776	275548	278270	SPCC550.02c	SPAC23H3.05c	cwf5	swd1	ecm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.553657264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768601	2538974	2542420	275548	278883	SPCC550.02c	SPAC19D5.03	cwf5	cid1	ecm2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.502940597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768602	2538974	2539667	275548	276222	SPCC550.02c	SPBC13G1.08c	cwf5	ash2	ecm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.570833352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768603	2538974	3361269	275548	280345	SPCC550.02c	SPBC31A8.01c	cwf5	rtn1	ecm2	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.400654948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768604	2538974	2538762	275548	275345	SPCC550.02c	SPCC306.04c	cwf5	set1	ecm2	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.477942084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768605	2538974	2543472	275548	279892	SPCC550.02c	SPAC959.04c	cwf5	omh6	ecm2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.878468205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768606	2539463	2542598	276026	279052	SPCC550.11	SPAC6G10.08	SPCC550.11	idp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377882322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768607	2539463	2542677	276026	279130	SPCC550.11	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC550.11	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.222877558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768608	2539463	2540929	276026	277445	SPCC550.11	SPBC354.03	SPCC550.11	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.554927956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768609	2539463	2542318	276026	278784	SPCC550.11	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC550.11	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.042022756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768610	2539463	2540825	276026	277343	SPCC550.11	SPBC428.08c	SPCC550.11	clr4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.892789457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768611	2539463	2540964	276026	277480	SPCC550.11	SPBC365.16	SPCC550.11	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.995572882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768612	2539463	2539023	276026	275596	SPCC550.11	SPCC594.05c	SPCC550.11	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634177733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768613	2539463	2541801	276026	278292	SPCC550.11	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC550.11	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.702149828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768614	2539463	2542660	276026	279113	SPCC550.11	SPAC328.03	SPCC550.11	tps1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.598738595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768615	2539463	2541710	276026	278205	SPCC550.11	SPAC343.11c	SPCC550.11	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.559383993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768616	2539463	2539348	276026	275914	SPCC550.11	SPCC18B5.07c	SPCC550.11	nup61	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.485433766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768617	2539463	2540967	276026	277483	SPCC550.11	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC550.11	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.943780253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768618	2539463	2541713	276026	278208	SPCC550.11	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC550.11	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039531264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768619	2539463	2539908	276026	276454	SPCC550.11	SPBC13E7.06	SPCC550.11	msd1	-	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44044632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768620	2539463	2543619	276026	280033	SPCC550.11	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC550.11	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.62684114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768621	2539463	2542767	276026	279217	SPCC550.11	SPAC1565.07c	SPCC550.11	knd1	-	SPAC1565.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.786933845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768622	2539463	2540498	276026	277026	SPCC550.11	SPBC27.02c	SPCC550.11	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.138991239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768623	2539463	2541531	276026	278031	SPCC550.11	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC550.11	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.578473493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768624	2539463	2542418	276026	278881	SPCC550.11	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC550.11	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.248660629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768625	2539463	2539668	276026	276223	SPCC550.11	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC550.11	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707172071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768626	2539463	2540134	276026	276671	SPCC550.11	SPBC17A3.03c	SPCC550.11	SPBC17A3.03c	-	pi043	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.25559567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768627	2539463	2541806	276026	278297	SPCC550.11	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC550.11	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.821756481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768628	2539463	2542175	276026	278650	SPCC550.11	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC550.11	mkh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.299401802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768629	2539463	2540558	276026	277085	SPCC550.11	SPBC2D10.17	SPCC550.11	clr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.359266416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768630	2539045	2542689	275618	279142	SPCC1235.05c	SPAC29B12.04	fft2	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994101298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768631	2539045	2539352	275618	275918	SPCC1235.05c	SPCC188.07	fft2	ccq1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.373215511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768632	2539045	2542311	275618	278777	SPCC1235.05c	SPAC16A10.05c	fft2	dad1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.244021726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768633	2539045	2543020	275618	279456	SPCC1235.05c	SPAC10F6.13c	fft2	SPAC10F6.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.989626352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768634	2539045	2539733	275618	276285	SPCC1235.05c	SPBC16E9.12c	fft2	pab2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.99466845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768635	2539045	2542519	275618	278977	SPCC1235.05c	SPAC19G12.08	fft2	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.054783327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768636	2539045	2539368	275618	275934	SPCC1235.05c	SPCC16A11.07	fft2	coq10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703994321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768637	2539045	2540882	275618	277399	SPCC1235.05c	SPBC4F6.08c	fft2	mrpl39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.196606986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768638	2539045	2541531	275618	278031	SPCC1235.05c	SPAC25A8.01c	fft2	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.88402985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768639	2539045	2542418	275618	278881	SPCC1235.05c	SPAC1805.07c	fft2	dad2	-	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.901356712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768640	2539045	2538916	275618	275493	SPCC1235.05c	SPCC16C4.17	fft2	mug123	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446569687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768641	2539045	2542222	275618	278695	SPCC1235.05c	SPAC31G5.18c	fft2	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780174542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768642	2539045	2542635	275618	279089	SPCC1235.05c	SPAC24H6.09	fft2	gef1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.022330635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768643	2539045	2543337	275618	279760	SPCC1235.05c	SPAC959.08	fft2	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.131902071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768644	2539045	2541177	275618	277691	SPCC1235.05c	SPBC725.05c	fft2	SPBC725.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.805405617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768645	2539045	2540320	275618	276850	SPCC1235.05c	SPBC3D6.04c	fft2	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.630388289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768646	2538986	2539788	275560	276338	SPCC895.06	SPBC17D1.02	elp2	dph2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.71572893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768647	2538986	2541257	275560	277771	SPCC895.06	SPBP23A10.14c	elp2	ell1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382951496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768648	2538986	2540942	275560	277458	SPCC895.06	SPBC3H7.14	elp2	mug176	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.688759166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768649	2538986	2542435	275560	278897	SPCC895.06	SPAC1805.16c	elp2	SPAC1805.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.131587541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768650	2538986	2543529	275560	279947	SPCC895.06	SPAC4C5.02c	elp2	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.18973856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768651	2538986	2542598	275560	279052	SPCC895.06	SPAC6G10.08	elp2	idp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.491540824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768652	2538986	2543634	275560	280048	SPCC895.06	SPAC3H8.04	elp2	SPAC3H8.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092815236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768653	2538986	2541512	275560	278013	SPCC895.06	SPAC11E3.08c	elp2	nse6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.176505976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768654	2538986	2542372	275560	278836	SPCC895.06	SPAC1F3.03	elp2	SPAC1F3.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.348020036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768655	2538986	2542066	275560	278543	SPCC895.06	SPAC227.05	elp2	SPAC227.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.404003354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768656	2538986	2541426	275560	277931	SPCC895.06	SPAC227.06	elp2	SPAC227.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779171538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768657	2538986	2541570	275560	278067	SPCC895.06	SPAC6G9.09c	elp2	rpl2401	-	rpl24|rpl24-01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.328677084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768658	2538986	2539684	275560	276239	SPCC895.06	SPBC16A3.16	elp2	SPBC16A3.16	-	cwc27	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980770374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768659	2538986	2541818	275560	278309	SPCC895.06	SPAC11G7.02	elp2	pub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.404690215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768660	2538986	2542671	275560	279124	SPCC895.06	SPAC824.09c	elp2	SPAC824.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.477959021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768661	2538986	2542197	275560	278672	SPCC895.06	SPAC1142.01	elp2	rqc1	-	SPAC1142.01|SPAC17G6.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.131079625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768662	2538986	2543575	275560	279990	SPCC895.06	SPAC644.13c	elp2	SPAC644.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.644064829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768663	2538986	2539035	275560	275608	SPCC895.06	SPCC794.09c	elp2	tef101	-	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.038968346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768664	2538986	2538896	275560	275474	SPCC895.06	SPCC584.11c	elp2	SPCC584.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.272740995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768665	2538986	2539930	275560	276474	SPCC895.06	SPBC1198.11c	elp2	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.055157176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768666	2538986	2541130	275560	277645	SPCC895.06	SPBC776.11	elp2	rpl2801	-	rpl28-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.893241033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768667	2538986	2539939	275560	276483	SPCC895.06	SPBC11G11.01	elp2	fis1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.991821517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768668	2538986	2541438	275560	277943	SPCC895.06	SPAC23G3.10c	elp2	ssr3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819636529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768669	2538986	2539068	275560	275640	SPCC895.06	SPCC1442.11c	elp2	SPCC1442.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095209096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768670	2538986	2541853	275560	278344	SPCC895.06	SPAC2F3.11	elp2	SPAC2F3.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386662966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768671	2538986	2543559	275560	279975	SPCC895.06	SPAC664.04c	elp2	rps1602	-	rps16|rps16-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.002101127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768672	2538986	2541002	275560	277517	SPCC895.06	SPBC3E7.07c	elp2	SPBC3E7.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382685717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768673	2538986	2538732	275560	275316	SPCC895.06	SPCC548.07c	elp2	ght1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.343506793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768674	2538986	2541117	275560	277632	SPCC895.06	SPBC646.13	elp2	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.418238137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768675	2538986	2541051	275560	277566	SPCC895.06	SPBC3E7.08c	elp2	rad13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320851587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768676	2538986	2542502	275560	278960	SPCC895.06	SPAC139.06	elp2	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05477063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768677	2538986	2543201	275560	279630	SPCC895.06	SPAC3F10.15c	elp2	spo12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87246531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768678	2538986	2541633	275560	278129	SPCC895.06	SPAC664.01c	elp2	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.268986944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768679	2538986	2543434	275560	279854	SPCC895.06	SPAC8F11.02c	elp2	dph3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.006539593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768680	2538986	2539890	275560	276436	SPCC895.06	SPBC16C6.03c	elp2	SPBC16C6.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.483344444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768681	2538986	2542701	275560	279154	SPCC895.06	SPAC26H5.05	elp2	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931884885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768682	2538986	2543103	275560	279535	SPCC895.06	SPAC3F10.09	elp2	SPAC3F10.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.623483748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768683	2538986	2540717	275560	277240	SPCC895.06	SPBC577.12	elp2	dph6	-	mug71	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09100346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768684	2538986	2540491	275560	277019	SPCC895.06	SPBC28E12.04	elp2	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.694947588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768685	2538986	2538806	275560	275387	SPCC895.06	SPCC1840.09	elp2	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.258023287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768686	2538986	2541361	275560	277872	SPCC895.06	SPBP8B7.10c	elp2	utp16	-	SPBP8B7.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.344608065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768687	2538986	2540999	275560	277515	SPCC895.06	SPBC4B4.04	elp2	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.388467365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768688	2538986	2540975	275560	277491	SPCC895.06	SPBC354.12	elp2	gpd3	-	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201784012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768689	2538986	2539420	275560	275985	SPCC895.06	SPCC970.07c	elp2	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.267032671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768690	2538986	2540560	275560	277087	SPCC895.06	SPBC2D10.14c	elp2	myo51	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447641525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768691	2538986	2540015	275560	276559	SPCC895.06	SPBC1685.02c	elp2	rps1202	-	rps12-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.287188021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768692	2538986	2542468	275560	278929	SPCC895.06	SPAC1D4.09c	elp2	rtf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381881476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768693	2538986	2541012	275560	277527	SPCC895.06	SPBC3H7.12	elp2	rav2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.196436537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768694	2538986	2540979	275560	277495	SPCC895.06	SPBC3H7.10	elp2	elp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.545415631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768695	2538986	2542816	275560	279263	SPCC895.06	SPAC4G8.11c	elp2	atp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852321592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768696	2538986	2541682	275560	278178	SPCC895.06	SPAC15F9.02	elp2	seh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.31717215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768697	2538986	2543681	275560	280095	SPCC895.06	SPAC9.02c	elp2	SPAC9.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.40717833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768698	2538986	2542689	275560	279142	SPCC895.06	SPAC29B12.04	elp2	snz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992392005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768699	2538986	2542724	275560	279175	SPCC895.06	SPAC767.01c	elp2	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982760928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768700	2538986	2539249	275560	275819	SPCC895.06	SPCC1450.05c	elp2	rox3	-	med19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.100110154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768701	2538986	2540306	275560	276836	SPCC895.06	SPBC2G5.02c	elp2	ckb2	-	SPBC2G5.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934007027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768702	2538986	2542848	275560	279294	SPCC895.06	SPAC9G1.03c	elp2	rpl3001	-	rpl30|rpl30-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043832641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768703	2538986	2543453	275560	279873	SPCC895.06	SPAC3G9.03	elp2	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.230555958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768704	2538986	2541119	275560	277634	SPCC895.06	SPBC651.11c	elp2	apm3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509164562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768705	2538986	2539937	275560	276481	SPCC895.06	SPBC1539.08	elp2	arf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.052390466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768706	2538986	2542012	275560	278495	SPCC895.06	SPAC23C11.02c	elp2	rps23	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.820317079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768707	2538986	2541761	275560	278255	SPCC895.06	SPAC7D4.12c	elp2	SPAC7D4.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.260817006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768708	2538986	2540463	275560	276991	SPCC895.06	SPBC2F12.15c	elp2	pfa3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867302289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768709	2538986	2540993	275560	277509	SPCC895.06	SPBC342.01c	elp2	alg6	-	SPBC3F6.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.977112188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768710	2538986	2542165	275560	278641	SPCC895.06	SPAC1782.08c	elp2	rex3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.614825283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768711	2538986	2541323	275560	277835	SPCC895.06	SPBP35G2.14	elp2	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.131758475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768712	2538986	2540425	275560	276953	SPCC895.06	SPBC27.06c	elp2	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.629123695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768713	2538986	2541424	275560	277929	SPCC895.06	SPAC23G3.04	elp2	ies4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.841124118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768714	2538986	2542318	275560	278784	SPCC895.06	SPAC16C9.05	elp2	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.55608912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768715	2538986	2540295	275560	276826	SPCC895.06	SPBC3B8.05	elp2	SPBC3B8.05	-	dph1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873387931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768716	2538986	2542277	275560	278746	SPCC895.06	SPAC17A5.02c	elp2	dbr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.151643426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768717	2538986	2541436	275560	277941	SPCC895.06	SPAC11H11.03c	elp2	SPAC11H11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320970843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768718	2538986	2541597	275560	278094	SPCC895.06	SPAC29E6.09	elp2	SPAC29E6.09	-	SPAC30.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319667303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768719	2538986	2541960	275560	278447	SPCC895.06	SPAC6G9.15c	elp2	SPAC6G9.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.693023003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768720	2538986	2540851	275560	277368	SPCC895.06	SPBC4F6.04	elp2	rpl2502	-	rpl23a-2|rpl25b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.079401956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768721	2538986	2541580	275560	278077	SPCC895.06	SPAC1687.05	elp2	pli1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.92219572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768722	2538986	2540127	275560	276664	SPCC895.06	SPBC106.20	elp2	exo70	-	SPBC582.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.382872042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768723	2538986	2543108	275560	279540	SPCC895.06	SPAC3A12.13c	elp2	SPAC3A12.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.080421117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768724	2538986	2539648	275560	276203	SPCC895.06	SPBC1198.08	elp2	SPBC1198.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.062041813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768725	2538986	2543641	275560	280055	SPCC895.06	SPAC3H5.08c	elp2	SPAC3H5.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700539981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768726	2538986	2543563	275560	279979	SPCC895.06	SPAC664.02c	elp2	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.47869498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768727	2538986	2542082	275560	278559	SPCC895.06	SPAC29B12.10c	elp2	pgt1	-	opt1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090556613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768728	2538986	2543426	275560	279846	SPCC895.06	SPAC631.02	elp2	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.868518833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768729	2538986	2542530	275560	278988	SPCC895.06	SPAC1399.02	elp2	SPAC1399.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384726461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768730	2538986	2539980	275560	276524	SPCC895.06	SPBC1773.14	elp2	arg7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4966349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768731	2538986	2538972	275560	275546	SPCC895.06	SPCC1739.15	elp2	wtf21	-	wtf3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928585221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768732	2538986	2542213	275560	278687	SPCC895.06	SPAC3G6.13c	elp2	rpl4101	-	rpl41-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.328886306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768733	2538986	2540825	275560	277343	SPCC895.06	SPBC428.08c	elp2	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.681481413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768734	2538986	2541926	275560	278414	SPCC895.06	SPAC222.14c	elp2	SPAC222.14c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81151302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768735	2538986	2542558	275560	279014	SPCC895.06	SPAC1952.07	elp2	rad1	-	rad19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.971150377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768736	2538986	2541021	275560	277536	SPCC895.06	SPBC3B8.10c	elp2	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.050614258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768737	2538986	2540964	275560	277480	SPCC895.06	SPBC365.16	elp2	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.771034743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768738	2538986	2542153	275560	278629	SPCC895.06	SPAC1952.10c	elp2	SPAC1952.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454738952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768739	2538986	2542568	275560	279024	SPCC895.06	SPAC1952.02	elp2	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982996891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768740	2538986	2539960	275560	276504	SPCC895.06	SPBC15D4.15	elp2	pho2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452719636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768741	2538986	2541275	275560	277789	SPCC895.06	SPBC947.06c	elp2	SPBC947.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864801178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768742	2538986	2539467	275560	276030	SPCC895.06	SPCC417.07c	elp2	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.757413814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768743	2538986	2543349	275560	279771	SPCC895.06	SPAC977.02	elp2	SPAC977.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.049001789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768744	2538986	2543514	275560	279932	SPCC895.06	SPAC4D7.03	elp2	pop2	-	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642586721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768745	2538986	2542679	275560	279132	SPCC895.06	SPAC12B10.07	elp2	acp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.058902026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768746	2538986	2543020	275560	279456	SPCC895.06	SPAC10F6.13c	elp2	SPAC10F6.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.412630985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768747	2538986	2540931	275560	277447	SPCC895.06	SPBC365.07c	elp2	SPBC365.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.198805298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768748	2538986	2542964	275560	279404	SPCC895.06	SPAC12G12.07c	elp2	SPAC12G12.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.545936802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768749	2538986	2538715	275560	275299	SPCC895.06	SPCC1223.05c	elp2	rpl3702	-	rpl37|rpl37-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.461279875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768750	2538986	2541237	275560	277751	SPCC895.06	SPBC947.04	elp2	pfl3	-	SPBC947.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097662464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768751	2538986	2542019	275560	278502	SPCC895.06	SPAC23A1.17	elp2	SPAC23A1.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510351981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768752	2538986	2541250	275560	277764	SPCC895.06	SPBC8D2.17	elp2	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154756958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768753	2538986	2540892	275560	277408	SPCC895.06	SPBC530.01	elp2	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.249612713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768754	2538986	2542298	275560	278765	SPCC895.06	SPAC29A4.02c	elp2	SPAC29A4.02c	-	tef3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767399365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768755	2538986	2541776	275560	278270	SPCC895.06	SPAC23H3.05c	elp2	swd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455594055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768756	2538986	2540401	275560	276929	SPCC895.06	SPBC2A9.02	elp2	SPBC2A9.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.15425166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768757	2538986	2539845	275560	276393	SPCC895.06	SPBC12C2.02c	elp2	ste20	-	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.920516117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768758	2538986	2539628	275560	276185	SPCC895.06	SPBC1604.03c	elp2	SPBC1604.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.625914982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768759	2538986	2540647	275560	277172	SPCC895.06	SPBC18H10.07	elp2	SPBC18H10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.83522589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768760	2538986	2541160	275560	277675	SPCC895.06	SPBC725.09c	elp2	hob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.875924002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768761	2538986	2540338	275560	276867	SPCC895.06	SPBC2G2.13c	elp2	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.868807672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768762	2538986	2541892	275560	278382	SPCC895.06	SPAP27G11.02	elp2	SPAP27G11.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568469199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768763	2538986	2540396	275560	276924	SPCC895.06	SPBC31F10.12	elp2	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097801321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768764	2538986	2540673	275560	277198	SPCC895.06	SPBC1D7.03	elp2	mug80	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.282696619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768765	2538986	2541192	275560	277706	SPCC895.06	SPBC83.17	elp2	SPBC83.17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.401449554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768766	2538986	2542543	275560	279000	SPCC895.06	SPAC30D11.11	elp2	SPAC30D11.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.259749668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768767	2538986	2542464	275560	278925	SPCC895.06	SPAC1A6.09c	elp2	lag1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.822107678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768768	2538986	2543638	275560	280052	SPCC895.06	SPAC3H8.09c	elp2	nab3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.878095901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768769	2538986	2542420	275560	278883	SPCC895.06	SPAC19D5.03	elp2	cid1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.024079651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768770	2538986	2539898	275560	276444	SPCC895.06	SPBC12D12.07c	elp2	trx2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.190160808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768771	2538986	2541578	275560	278075	SPCC895.06	SPAC25B8.05	elp2	deg1	-	SPAC25B8.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.381219594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768772	2538986	2540543	275560	277070	SPCC895.06	SPBC29A10.06c	elp2	ely5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988572203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768773	2538986	2541943	275560	278430	SPCC895.06	SPAC222.07c	elp2	hri2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326270514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768774	2538986	2542168	275560	278643	SPCC895.06	SPAC17A5.16	elp2	ftp105	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.843702178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768775	2538986	2542817	275560	279264	SPCC895.06	SPAC13G6.02c	elp2	rps101	-	rps1-1|rps3a-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.669369684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768776	2538986	2540403	275560	276931	SPCC895.06	SPBC21D10.11c	elp2	nfs1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.631672904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768777	2538986	2539484	275560	276047	SPCC895.06	SPCC594.04c	elp2	SPCC594.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.409590506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768778	2538986	2542921	275560	279362	SPCC895.06	SPAC1093.01	elp2	ppr5	-	SPAC12B10.18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872861238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768779	2538986	2542469	275560	278930	SPCC895.06	SPAC19A8.04	elp2	erg5	-	cyp61	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327156785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768780	2538986	2539999	275560	276543	SPCC895.06	SPBC1734.15	elp2	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.410138304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768781	2538986	2539603	275560	276161	SPCC895.06	SPBC1289.06c	elp2	ppr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.091346771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768782	2538986	2539689	275560	276244	SPCC895.06	SPBC1861.03	elp2	mak10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925699956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768783	2538986	2541929	275560	278417	SPCC895.06	SPAC23C4.12	elp2	hhp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.18236041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768784	2538986	2542860	275560	279306	SPCC895.06	SPAC8C9.09c	elp2	mug129	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326159452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768785	2538986	2543245	275560	279673	SPCC895.06	SPAC56F8.06c	elp2	alg10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867069362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768786	2538986	2542651	275560	279105	SPCC895.06	SPAC24C9.12c	elp2	SPAC24C9.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923730833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768787	2538986	2543643	275560	280057	SPCC895.06	SPAC3G9.07c	elp2	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320621349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768788	2538986	2541899	275560	278389	SPCC895.06	SPAC22E12.11c	elp2	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783002147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768789	2538986	2541739	275560	278233	SPCC895.06	SPAC2G11.10c	elp2	SPAC2G11.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.071964083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768790	2538986	2543396	275560	279818	SPCC895.06	SPAC4D7.11	elp2	dsc4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.614112436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768791	2538986	2543406	275560	279828	SPCC895.06	SPAC9.12c	elp2	atp12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781826148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768792	2538986	2540326	275560	276856	SPCC895.06	SPBC2G5.06c	elp2	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320534109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768793	2538986	2541824	275560	278315	SPCC895.06	SPAC27E2.02	elp2	SPAC27E2.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323460713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768794	2538986	2538769	275560	275352	SPCC895.06	SPCC126.04c	elp2	sgf73	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.491314254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768795	2538986	2542861	275560	279307	SPCC895.06	SPAC13G7.13c	elp2	msa1	-	SPAC6C3.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09323205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768796	2538986	2542126	275560	278602	SPCC895.06	SPAC1B3.05	elp2	not3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039081713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768797	2538986	2542528	275560	278986	SPCC895.06	SPAC1B3.08	elp2	SPAC1B3.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.197879301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768798	2538986	2540628	275560	277154	SPCC895.06	SPBC25B2.08	elp2	SPBC25B2.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.271720835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768799	2538986	2540961	275560	277477	SPCC895.06	SPBC36B7.03	elp2	sec63	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.323256154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768800	2538986	2538849	275560	275430	SPCC895.06	SPCC330.14c	elp2	rpl2402	-	rpl24-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.594978322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768801	2538986	2541720	275560	278214	SPCC895.06	SPAC23H3.13c	elp2	gpa2	-	git8	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810984441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768802	2538986	2540394	275560	276922	SPCC895.06	SPBC2D10.09	elp2	snr1	-	SPBC2D10.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.571059684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768803	2538986	2540836	275560	277354	SPCC895.06	SPBC18H10.19	elp2	vps38	-	atg14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.595304166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768804	2538986	2542431	275560	278893	SPCC895.06	SPAC1A6.01c	elp2	SPAC1A6.01c	-	SPAC23C4.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778596375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768805	2538986	2543378	275560	279800	SPCC895.06	SPAC3H8.07c	elp2	pac10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931200253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768806	2538986	2542254	275560	278724	SPCC895.06	SPAC30D11.04c	elp2	nup124	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.202037649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768807	2538986	2542867	275560	279312	SPCC895.06	SPAC343.16	elp2	lys2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.566692183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768808	2538986	2540374	275560	276903	SPCC895.06	SPBC31F10.02	elp2	SPBC31F10.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63450473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768809	2538986	2543234	275560	279662	SPCC895.06	SPAC977.11	elp2	SPAC977.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.054966722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768810	2538986	2540741	275560	277264	SPCC895.06	SPBC83.05	elp2	SPBC83.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979699782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768811	2538986	2542519	275560	278977	SPCC895.06	SPAC19G12.08	elp2	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515586253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768812	2538986	2542056	275560	278535	SPCC895.06	SPAC6G9.14	elp2	SPAC6G9.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.267722341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768813	2538986	2542439	275560	278901	SPCC895.06	SPAC17A5.08	elp2	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.227401338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768814	2538986	2538949	275560	275523	SPCC895.06	SPCC320.03	elp2	SPCC320.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516131807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768815	2538986	2541708	275560	278203	SPCC895.06	SPAC31A2.02	elp2	trm112	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.228099281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768816	2538986	2543224	275560	279652	SPCC895.06	SPAPB8E5.10	elp2	SPAPB8E5.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042647219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768817	2538986	2541464	275560	277966	SPCC895.06	SPAC222.08c	elp2	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.225434968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768818	2538986	2541053	275560	277568	SPCC895.06	SPBC56F2.10c	elp2	alg5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.285228333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768819	2538986	2543307	275560	279731	SPCC895.06	SPAC694.05c	elp2	rps2502	-	rps25|rps25-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040589437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768820	2538986	2540180	275560	276713	SPCC895.06	SPBC16D10.11c	elp2	rps1801	-	rps18-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.819028608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768821	2538986	2539847	275560	276395	SPCC895.06	SPBC530.14c	elp2	dsk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.922828359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768822	2538986	3361470	275560	280546	SPCC895.06	SPAC3G9.01	elp2	nsk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874093373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768823	2538986	2541395	275560	277904	SPCC895.06	SPBP8B7.25	elp2	cyp4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870628832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768824	2538986	2539052	275560	275625	SPCC895.06	SPCC663.09c	elp2	SPCC663.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576415372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768825	2538986	2541296	275560	277808	SPCC895.06	SPBP8B7.06	elp2	rpp201	-	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.14962278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768826	2538986	2541054	275560	277569	SPCC895.06	SPBC3B8.08	elp2	SPBC3B8.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640876967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768827	2538986	2539427	275560	275992	SPCC895.06	SPCC663.15c	elp2	SPCC663.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.980377582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768828	2538986	2541266	275560	277780	SPCC895.06	SPBP16F5.05c	elp2	yar1	-	SPBP16F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040831337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768829	2538986	2541186	275560	277700	SPCC895.06	SPBC725.01	elp2	SPBC725.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.28401191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768830	2538986	2540844	275560	277361	SPCC895.06	SPBC1921.04c	elp2	SPBC1921.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.617161696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768831	2538986	2543390	275560	279812	SPCC895.06	SPAC631.01c	elp2	acp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.841075939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768832	2538986	2540533	275560	277061	SPCC895.06	SPBC29A10.16c	elp2	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.04123236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768833	2538986	2541680	275560	278176	SPCC895.06	SPAC22F8.09	elp2	rrp16	-	nop53	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.568527711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768834	2538986	2542255	275560	278725	SPCC895.06	SPAC57A7.08	elp2	pzh1	-	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.839119415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768835	2538986	2539349	275560	275915	SPCC895.06	SPCC613.11c	elp2	meu23	-	B13958-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448777959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768836	2538986	2539812	275560	276362	SPCC895.06	SPBC1347.02	elp2	fkbp39	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090840607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768837	2538986	2541337	275560	277848	SPCC895.06	SPBP35G2.13c	elp2	swc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152317725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768838	2538986	2541378	275560	277889	SPCC895.06	SPBP8B7.21	elp2	ubp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.273794856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768839	2538986	2540926	275560	277442	SPCC895.06	SPBC359.06	elp2	mug14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633673896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768840	2538986	2542973	275560	279412	SPCC895.06	SPAC10F6.04	elp2	SPAC10F6.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.020615932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768841	2538986	2541742	275560	278236	SPCC895.06	SPAC22H10.09	elp2	SPAC22H10.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.568019925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768842	2538986	2538848	275560	275429	SPCC895.06	SPCC613.12c	elp2	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.023313844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768843	2538986	2541017	275560	277532	SPCC895.06	SPBC36.07	elp2	elp1	-	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.09813305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768844	2538986	2542869	275560	279314	SPCC895.06	SPAC140.02	elp2	gar2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.711194356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768845	2538986	2541144	275560	277659	SPCC895.06	SPBC685.06	elp2	rps001	-	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.122408711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768846	2538986	2541762	275560	278256	SPCC895.06	SPAC139.01c	elp2	SPAC139.01c	-	SPAC955.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.926815063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768847	2538986	2541713	275560	278208	SPCC895.06	SPAC3A12.12	elp2	atp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.151666038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768848	2538986	2540821	275560	277339	SPCC895.06	SPBC800.03	elp2	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.549261085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768849	2538986	2539538	275560	276100	SPCC895.06	SPCC364.06	elp2	nap1	-	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.97344385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768850	2538986	2542806	275560	279254	SPCC895.06	SPAC1610.01	elp2	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3435487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768851	2538986	2543391	275560	279813	SPCC895.06	SPAC4G9.09c	elp2	arg11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507540699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768852	2538986	2543332	275560	279755	SPCC895.06	SPAPB8E5.04c	elp2	SPAPB8E5.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035943113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768853	2538986	2539842	275560	276390	SPCC895.06	SPBC14C8.15	elp2	SPBC14C8.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.259550772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768854	2538986	2539354	275560	275920	SPCC895.06	SPCC4F11.03c	elp2	SPCC4F11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.202003891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768855	2538986	2542759	275560	279209	SPCC895.06	SPAC9G1.07	elp2	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.322464996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768856	2538986	2543628	275560	280042	SPCC895.06	SPAC3H8.10	elp2	spo20	-	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.267783587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768857	2538986	2542327	275560	278793	SPCC895.06	SPAC16C9.06c	elp2	upf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814534743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768858	2538986	2540619	275560	277145	SPCC895.06	SPBC25H2.15	elp2	SPBC25H2.15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035771777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768859	2538986	2543071	275560	279504	SPCC895.06	SPAC3C7.06c	elp2	pit1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.377338617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768860	2538986	2541175	275560	277689	SPCC895.06	SPBC839.13c	elp2	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101344449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768861	2538986	2543670	275560	280084	SPCC895.06	SPAPB1E7.06c	elp2	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092831271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768862	2538986	2541909	275560	278399	SPCC895.06	SPAC227.01c	elp2	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926700232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768863	2538986	2543304	275560	279728	SPCC895.06	SPAC6B12.12	elp2	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.126115827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768864	2538986	2543096	275560	279528	SPCC895.06	SPAC977.05c	elp2	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925922271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768865	2538986	2540531	275560	277059	SPCC895.06	SPBC23E6.08	elp2	sat1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.700027499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768866	2538986	2542294	275560	278762	SPCC895.06	SPAC1805.09c	elp2	fmt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981758019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768867	2538986	2540604	275560	277130	SPCC895.06	SPBC25D12.05	elp2	trm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.021003177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768868	2538986	2541432	275560	277937	SPCC895.06	SPAC1F5.05c	elp2	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.763332584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768869	2538986	2542472	275560	278933	SPCC895.06	SPAC9E9.13	elp2	wos2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448050055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768870	2538986	2543066	275560	279499	SPCC895.06	SPAC343.12	elp2	rds1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.61795472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768871	2538986	2543662	275560	280076	SPCC895.06	SPAC9.07c	elp2	SPAC9.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386401575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768872	2538986	2541425	275560	277930	SPCC895.06	SPAC2C4.17c	elp2	msy2	-	SPAC2C4.17c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.402484606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768873	2538986	2540725	275560	277248	SPCC895.06	SPBC215.14c	elp2	vps20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.271972189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768874	2538986	2539013	275560	275586	SPCC895.06	SPCC364.03	elp2	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.609656496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768875	2538986	2542731	275560	279181	SPCC895.06	SPAC5H10.09c	elp2	SPAC5H10.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.70549745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768876	2538986	2543329	275560	279752	SPCC895.06	SPAC56F8.02	elp2	SPAC56F8.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323241621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768877	2538986	2540325	275560	276855	SPCC895.06	SPBC21B10.10	elp2	rps402	-	rps4-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.618773441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768878	2538986	2540164	275560	276699	SPCC895.06	SPBC1683.03c	elp2	SPBC1683.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153473199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768879	2538986	2539136	275560	275708	SPCC895.06	SPCC1919.05	elp2	SPCC1919.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095043321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768880	2538986	2541229	275560	277743	SPCC895.06	SPBC839.05c	elp2	rps1701	-	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.328447349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768881	2538986	2540677	275560	277202	SPCC895.06	SPBC21B10.03c	elp2	ath1	-	SPBC21B10.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.408490499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768882	2538986	2542326	275560	278792	SPCC895.06	SPAC16C9.07	elp2	pom2	-	SPAC2G11.01|mug189|ppk5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714065632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768883	2538986	2539514	275560	276076	SPCC895.06	SPCC663.14c	elp2	trp663	-	SPCC663.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.921798571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768884	2538986	2543091	275560	279524	SPCC895.06	SPAC12G12.15	elp2	sif3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.698670657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768885	2538986	2540211	275560	276744	SPCC895.06	SPBC947.15c	elp2	nde1	-	SPBC947.15c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.144401631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768886	2538986	2542826	275560	279273	SPCC895.06	SPAC13G6.09	elp2	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.771344401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768887	2538986	2541380	275560	277891	SPCC895.06	SPBPB2B2.13	elp2	gal1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877551841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768888	2538986	2540928	275560	277444	SPCC895.06	SPBC3E7.10	elp2	fma1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.587849333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768889	2538986	2540927	275560	277443	SPCC895.06	SPBC365.06	elp2	pmt3	-	smt3|ubl2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.560666612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768890	2538986	2538787	275560	275368	SPCC895.06	SPCC364.02c	elp2	bis1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.922415843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768891	2538986	2539207	275560	275777	SPCC895.06	SPCC285.09c	elp2	cgs2	-	pde1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147088203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768892	2538986	2541757	275560	278251	SPCC895.06	SPAC2F7.10	elp2	akr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709880181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768893	2538986	2539702	275560	276255	SPCC895.06	SPBC1604.12	elp2	SPBC1604.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.41939043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768894	2538986	2539726	275560	276278	SPCC895.06	SPBC13E7.08c	elp2	leo1	-	SPBC13E7.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876834225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768895	2538986	2542904	275560	279348	SPCC895.06	SPAC144.11	elp2	rps1102	-	rps11|rps11-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.383078608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768896	2538986	2539375	275560	275941	SPCC895.06	SPCC4G3.11	elp2	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.118707442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768897	2538986	2543380	275560	279802	SPCC895.06	SPAC4G9.16c	elp2	rpl901	-	rpl9-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.027483835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768898	2538986	2540146	275560	276683	SPCC895.06	SPBC17A3.06	elp2	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.791140912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768899	2538986	2539189	275560	275760	SPCC895.06	SPCC1682.16	elp2	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992120597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768900	2538986	2539178	275560	275749	SPCC895.06	SPCC1682.14	elp2	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.66696286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768901	2538986	2541084	275560	277599	SPCC895.06	SPBC649.02	elp2	rps1902	-	rps19|rps19-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.236409326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768902	2538986	2543337	275560	279760	SPCC895.06	SPAC959.08	elp2	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.825459141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768903	2538986	2542021	275560	278504	SPCC895.06	SPAP14E8.02	elp2	tos4	-	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.120372643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768904	2538986	2542702	275560	279155	SPCC895.06	SPAC8E11.01c	elp2	SPAC8E11.01c	-	SPAC959.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.987304135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768905	2538986	2543486	275560	279906	SPCC895.06	SPAC959.07	elp2	rps403	-	rps4|rps4-3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152604269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768906	2538986	2539253	275560	275823	SPCC895.06	SPCC1827.03c	elp2	SPCC1827.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.918709329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768907	2538986	3361360	275560	280436	SPCC895.06	SPBC1652.01	elp2	SPBC1652.01	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808579163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768908	2538986	2542716	275560	279169	SPCC895.06	SPAC25H1.07	elp2	emc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.028461367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768909	2538986	2543220	275560	279648	SPCC895.06	SPAPB21F2.02	elp2	SPAPB21F2.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.339284529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768910	2538986	2543400	275560	279822	SPCC895.06	SPAC3G9.11c	elp2	SPAC3G9.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.454254189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768911	2538986	2543384	275560	279806	SPCC895.06	SPAC637.06	elp2	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.345995092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768912	2538986	2541806	275560	278297	SPCC895.06	SPAC4G8.13c	elp2	prz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091343528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768913	2538986	2543277	275560	279705	SPCC895.06	SPAC1002.03c	elp2	gls2	-	gls2alpha	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808773373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768914	2538986	2540766	275560	277286	SPCC895.06	SPBC19C2.02	elp2	pmt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926990841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768915	2538986	2538854	275560	275435	SPCC895.06	SPCP1E11.05c	elp2	are2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.125518449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768916	2538986	2543087	275560	279520	SPCC895.06	SPAC30C2.04	elp2	SPAC30C2.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.465652555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768917	2538986	2542795	275560	279243	SPCC895.06	SPAC9G1.05	elp2	aip1	-	SPAC9G1.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770476699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768918	2538986	2538920	275560	275497	SPCC895.06	SPCC1840.05c	elp2	SPCC1840.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643374252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768919	2538986	2541003	275560	277518	SPCC895.06	SPBC3E7.16c	elp2	leu3	-	SPBC4F6.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925187993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768920	2538986	2540558	275560	277085	SPCC895.06	SPBC2D10.17	elp2	clr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773089444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768921	2538986	2541867	275560	278357	SPCC895.06	SPAC22E12.14c	elp2	sck2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.359465222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768922	2538986	2541478	275560	277980	SPCC895.06	SPAC2F7.17	elp2	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.401272711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768923	2538986	2539085	275560	275657	SPCC895.06	SPCC285.15c	elp2	rps2802	-	rps28|rps28-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.867389686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768924	2538986	2543523	275560	279941	SPCC895.06	SPAC4F10.16c	elp2	SPAC4F10.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924883507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768925	2538986	2543333	275560	279756	SPCC895.06	SPAC694.02	elp2	SPAC694.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.130278815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768926	2538986	2538947	275560	275521	SPCC895.06	SPCC1682.12c	elp2	ubp16	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.516452836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768927	2538986	2543448	275560	279868	SPCC895.06	SPAC3H5.07	elp2	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.97591777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768928	2538986	2542460	275560	278921	SPCC895.06	SPAC1F12.03c	elp2	SPAC1F12.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.93986859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768929	2538986	2540383	275560	276912	SPCC895.06	SPBC31E1.02c	elp2	pmr1	-	cps5|pgak2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992346848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768930	2538986	2540309	275560	276839	SPCC895.06	SPBC21B10.13c	elp2	yox1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.073291737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768931	2538986	2543472	275560	279892	SPCC895.06	SPAC959.04c	elp2	omh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.55500717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768932	2538986	2542561	275560	279017	SPCC895.06	SPAC31G5.17c	elp2	rps1001	-	rps10-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.699100833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768933	2538986	2541297	275560	277809	SPCC895.06	SPBC9B6.07	elp2	nop52	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.45973186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768934	2538986	2540320	275560	276850	SPCC895.06	SPBC3D6.04c	elp2	mad1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196377918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768935	2538986	2540787	275560	277306	SPCC895.06	SPBC1921.07c	elp2	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036509628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768936	2538986	2539494	275560	276057	SPCC895.06	SPCC4G3.08	elp2	psk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.27470001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768937	2538986	2539001	275560	275575	SPCC895.06	SPCC1494.08c	elp2	SPCC1494.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.133686229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768938	2538986	2542578	275560	279034	SPCC895.06	SPAC18B11.09c	elp2	SPAC18B11.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844574085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768939	2538986	2540649	275560	277174	SPCC895.06	SPBC19F8.08	elp2	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868588894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768940	2538986	2540736	275560	277259	SPCC895.06	SPBC19F8.02	elp2	SPBC19F8.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.772442001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768941	2541685	2538792	278181	275373	SPAC1039.05c	SPCP1E11.10	klf1	SPCP1E11.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.912176315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768942	2540601	2541902	277127	278392	SPBC29A3.14c	SPAC27E2.07	trt1	pvg2	-	mug53	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506872267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768943	2540601	2541512	277127	278013	SPBC29A3.14c	SPAC11E3.08c	trt1	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.125637925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768944	2540601	2540235	277127	276767	SPBC29A3.14c	SPBC336.13c	trt1	SPBC336.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386579543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768945	2540601	2539930	277127	276474	SPBC29A3.14c	SPBC1198.11c	trt1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.626699714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768946	2540601	2540161	277127	276696	SPBC29A3.14c	SPBC13E7.03c	trt1	SPBC13E7.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.503799889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768947	2540601	2539420	277127	275985	SPBC29A3.14c	SPCC970.07c	trt1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.410441625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768948	2540601	2541205	277127	277719	SPBC29A3.14c	SPBC839.02	trt1	SPBC839.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.088818322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768949	2540601	2542273	277127	278742	SPBC29A3.14c	SPAC17H9.13c	trt1	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.566056149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768950	2540601	2543145	277127	279577	SPBC29A3.14c	SPAC4F8.15	trt1	itr1	-	SPAC7D4.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.192663891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768951	2540601	2538801	277127	275382	SPBC29A3.14c	SPCC285.13c	trt1	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451584673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768952	2540601	2540306	277127	276836	SPBC29A3.14c	SPBC2G5.02c	trt1	ckb2	-	SPBC2G5.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634399185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768953	2540601	2540425	277127	276953	SPBC29A3.14c	SPBC27.06c	trt1	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330739646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768954	2540601	2539792	277127	276342	SPBC29A3.14c	SPBC1271.14	trt1	SPBC1271.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.338251706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768955	2540601	2539823	277127	276373	SPBC29A3.14c	SPBC16A3.18	trt1	cip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.740526411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768956	2540601	2539352	277127	275918	SPBC29A3.14c	SPCC188.07	trt1	ccq1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571557396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768957	2540601	2539310	277127	275877	SPBC29A3.14c	SPCC285.17	trt1	spp27	-	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.323539177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768958	2540601	2539467	277127	276030	SPBC29A3.14c	SPCC417.07c	trt1	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.592117004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768959	2540601	2542177	277127	278652	SPBC29A3.14c	SPAC17H9.08	trt1	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328309044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768960	2540601	2542707	277127	279160	SPBC29A3.14c	SPAC25G10.03	trt1	zip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317403023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768961	2540601	2540338	277127	276867	SPBC29A3.14c	SPBC2G2.13c	trt1	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.089213543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768962	2540601	2539046	277127	275619	SPBC29A3.14c	SPCC1223.12c	trt1	meu10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.815284074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768963	2540601	2541435	277127	277940	SPBC29A3.14c	SPAC2E1P5.02c	trt1	mug109	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.351428899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768964	2540601	2543363	277127	279785	SPBC29A3.14c	SPAPB24D3.09c	trt1	pdr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.125150035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768965	2540601	2541183	277127	277697	SPBC29A3.14c	SPBC725.14	trt1	arg6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.914700492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768966	2540601	2539857	277127	276404	SPBC29A3.14c	SPBC1604.20c	trt1	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980324105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768967	2540601	2542651	277127	279105	SPBC29A3.14c	SPAC24C9.12c	trt1	SPAC24C9.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318301742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768968	2540601	2539815	277127	276365	SPBC29A3.14c	SPBC1105.02c	trt1	lys4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.932254377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768969	2540601	2543236	277127	279664	SPBC29A3.14c	SPAC8C9.04	trt1	SPAC8C9.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.747940285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768970	2540601	2543495	277127	279914	SPBC29A3.14c	SPAC513.03	trt1	mfm2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.026036524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768971	2540601	2543683	277127	280097	SPBC29A3.14c	SPAPB1E7.04c	trt1	SPAPB1E7.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32981489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768972	2540601	2539348	277127	275914	SPBC29A3.14c	SPCC18B5.07c	trt1	nup61	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.963076328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768973	2540601	2542255	277127	278725	SPBC29A3.14c	SPAC57A7.08	trt1	pzh1	-	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.991775083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768974	2540601	2540930	277127	277446	SPBC29A3.14c	SPBC354.10	trt1	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383974749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768975	2540601	2538848	277127	275429	SPBC29A3.14c	SPCC613.12c	trt1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77532997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768976	2540601	3361520	277127	280596	SPBC29A3.14c	SPAC1610.02c	trt1	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.675429733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768977	2540601	2541144	277127	277659	SPBC29A3.14c	SPBC685.06	trt1	rps001	-	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.93681115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768978	2540601	2541786	277127	278278	SPBC29A3.14c	SPAC22F3.08c	trt1	rok1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.296410464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768979	2540601	2541175	277127	277689	SPBC29A3.14c	SPBC839.13c	trt1	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.343675776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768980	2540601	2543106	277127	279538	SPBC29A3.14c	SPAC3A11.13	trt1	SPAC3A11.13	-	SPAC3H5.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328333337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768981	2540601	2541909	277127	278399	SPBC29A3.14c	SPAC227.01c	trt1	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.808037488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768982	2540601	2540531	277127	277059	SPBC29A3.14c	SPBC23E6.08	trt1	sat1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.419723543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768983	2540601	2542826	277127	279273	SPBC29A3.14c	SPAC13G6.09	trt1	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844497147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768984	2540601	2539668	277127	276223	SPBC29A3.14c	SPBC11B10.10c	trt1	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.885825291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768985	2540601	2539928	277127	276472	SPBC29A3.14c	SPBC1604.08c	trt1	imp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.429335973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768986	2540601	2542904	277127	279348	SPBC29A3.14c	SPAC144.11	trt1	rps1102	-	rps11|rps11-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.14634005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768987	2540601	2543387	277127	279809	SPBC29A3.14c	SPAPB1E7.02c	trt1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.19843294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768988	2540601	2542159	277127	278635	SPBC29A3.14c	SPAC1834.09	trt1	mug51	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.846646664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768989	2540601	2540173	277127	276706	SPBC29A3.14c	SPBC106.13	trt1	SPBC106.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392021374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768990	2540601	2542566	277127	279022	SPBC29A3.14c	SPAC8C9.12c	trt1	SPAC8C9.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575557465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768991	2540601	2542795	277127	279243	SPBC29A3.14c	SPAC9G1.05	trt1	aip1	-	SPAC9G1.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.973986562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768992	2540601	2539588	277127	276146	SPBC29A3.14c	SPCC962.04	trt1	rps1201	-	rps12|rps12-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.718025756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768993	2540601	2542859	277127	279305	SPBC29A3.14c	SPAC13G6.13	trt1	SPAC13G6.13	-	SPAC24B11.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.3897941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768994	2543527	2541584	279945	278081	SPAC4C5.01	SPAP32A8.02	SPAC4C5.01	SPAP32A8.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.313491877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768995	2543527	2541346	279945	277857	SPAC4C5.01	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC4C5.01	ppm1	-	SPBP8B7.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.823117588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768996	2543527	2541323	279945	277835	SPAC4C5.01	SPBP35G2.14	SPAC4C5.01	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386281012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768997	2543527	2542373	279945	278837	SPAC4C5.01	SPAC1805.06c	SPAC4C5.01	hem2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815148508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768998	2543527	2542311	279945	278777	SPAC4C5.01	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC4C5.01	dad1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.943865808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
768999	2543527	2540797	279945	277316	SPAC4C5.01	SPBC18H10.11c	SPAC4C5.01	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.043308072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769000	2543527	2540348	279945	276877	SPAC4C5.01	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC4C5.01	exo1	-	mut2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.938167835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769001	2543527	2542902	279945	279346	SPAC4C5.01	SPAC144.05	SPAC4C5.01	SPAC144.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.076013892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769002	2543527	2539974	279945	276518	SPAC4C5.01	SPBC32H8.07	SPAC4C5.01	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.91625244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769003	2543527	2542070	279945	278547	SPAC4C5.01	SPAC29B12.02c	SPAC4C5.01	set2	-	kmt3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505535123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769004	2543527	2540836	279945	277354	SPAC4C5.01	SPBC18H10.19	SPAC4C5.01	vps38	-	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.646927019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769005	2543527	2539538	279945	276100	SPAC4C5.01	SPCC364.06	SPAC4C5.01	nap1	-	nap11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.800030626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769006	2543527	2542407	279945	278871	SPAC4C5.01	SPAC19B12.06c	SPAC4C5.01	SPAC19B12.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.465082071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769007	2543527	2541175	279945	277689	SPAC4C5.01	SPBC839.13c	SPAC4C5.01	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.850937503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769008	2543527	2543304	279945	279728	SPAC4C5.01	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC4C5.01	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.350812661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769009	2543527	2541531	279945	278031	SPAC4C5.01	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC4C5.01	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.309299965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769010	2543527	2539359	279945	275925	SPAC4C5.01	SPCC16C4.06c	SPAC4C5.01	pus3	-	SPCC16C4.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990040487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769011	2543527	2542309	279945	278775	SPAC4C5.01	SPAC16A10.02	SPAC4C5.01	sub1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.120654732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769012	2543527	2540146	279945	276683	SPAC4C5.01	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC4C5.01	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.082833169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769013	2543527	2543076	279945	279509	SPAC4C5.01	SPAC30C2.07	SPAC4C5.01	SPAC30C2.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872084979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769014	2543527	2542424	279945	278886	SPAC4C5.01	SPAC1805.14	SPAC4C5.01	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.850389758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769015	2543527	2542460	279945	278921	SPAC4C5.01	SPAC1F12.03c	SPAC4C5.01	SPAC1F12.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.506782882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769016	2543527	2539033	279945	275606	SPAC4C5.01	SPCC1450.07c	SPAC4C5.01	dao1	-	SPCC1450.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639899003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769017	2543527	2538730	279945	275314	SPAC4C5.01	SPCC31H12.02c	SPAC4C5.01	mug73	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.129370667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769018	2541184	2539293	277698	275861	SPBC725.17c	SPCC553.08c	rrn11	ria1	-	SPCC553.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.271673348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769019	2541184	2540125	277698	276662	SPBC725.17c	SPBC16C6.01c	rrn11	SPBC16C6.01c	-	SPBC543.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981357489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769020	2541798	2542207	278289	278682	SPAC22F3.03c	SPAC17H9.10c	rdh54	ddb1	mug34|tid1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049799125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769021	2541798	2539845	278289	276393	SPAC22F3.03c	SPBC12C2.02c	rdh54	ste20	mug34|tid1	ste16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.890058213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769022	2541798	3361491	278289	280567	SPAC22F3.03c	SPAC1805.08	rdh54	dlc1	mug34|tid1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.855984642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769023	2541798	2541900	278289	278390	SPAC22F3.03c	SPAC23H4.17c	rdh54	srb10	mug34|tid1	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.656298414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769024	2541798	2543567	278289	279983	SPAC22F3.03c	SPAC890.03	rdh54	ppk16	mug34|tid1	mug92	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.936082412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769025	2541798	2540555	278289	277082	SPAC22F3.03c	SPBP16F5.02	rdh54	mcs2	mug34|tid1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.167915676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769026	2542696	2542207	279149	278682	SPAC29B12.03	SPAC17H9.10c	spd1	ddb1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.094617123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769027	2542696	2539944	279149	276488	SPAC29B12.03	SPBC1198.06c	spd1	SPBC1198.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874926567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769028	2542696	2539576	279149	276136	SPAC29B12.03	SPCC794.01c	spd1	zwf2	-	SPCC794.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.20443212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769029	2542696	2541346	279149	277857	SPAC29B12.03	SPBP8B7.08c	spd1	ppm1	-	SPBP8B7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389580836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769030	2542696	2542180	279149	278655	SPAC29B12.03	SPAC589.07c	spd1	atg1801	-	atg18|atg18a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98153017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769031	2542696	2542036	279149	278518	SPAC29B12.03	SPAC23A1.19c	spd1	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.122818325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769032	2542696	2542311	279149	278777	SPAC29B12.03	SPAC16A10.05c	spd1	dad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.657066022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769033	2542696	2541801	279149	278292	SPAC29B12.03	SPAC2F7.08c	spd1	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.458265726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769034	2542696	2540352	279149	276881	SPAC29B12.03	SPBC215.03c	spd1	csn1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.789060446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769035	2542696	2541496	279149	277998	SPAC29B12.03	SPAC23D3.09	spd1	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.822497582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769036	2542696	2542398	279149	278862	SPAC29B12.03	SPAC1805.03c	spd1	trm13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.034149516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769037	2542696	2543304	279149	279728	SPAC29B12.03	SPAC6B12.12	spd1	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.892406629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769038	2542696	2542418	279149	278881	SPAC29B12.03	SPAC1805.07c	spd1	dad2	-	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.245483398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769039	2542696	2540936	279149	277452	SPAC29B12.03	SPBC800.05c	spd1	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.128053561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769040	2542696	2538792	279149	275373	SPAC29B12.03	SPCP1E11.10	spd1	SPCP1E11.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.440886432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769041	2542696	2541806	279149	278297	SPAC29B12.03	SPAC4G8.13c	spd1	prz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.615019556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769042	2538801	2540060	275382	276598	SPCC285.13c	SPBC106.01	nup60	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.408167221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769043	2538801	2543317	275382	279741	SPCC285.13c	SPAC823.14	nup60	ptf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.841808073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769044	2538801	2540131	275382	276668	SPCC285.13c	SPBC1778.05c	nup60	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703379423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769045	2538801	2542378	275382	278842	SPCC285.13c	SPAC1805.04	nup60	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.568653018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769046	2538801	2538710	275382	275294	SPCC285.13c	SPCC1020.12c	nup60	xap5	-	SPCC14G10.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514621686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769047	2538801	2541361	275382	277872	SPCC285.13c	SPBP8B7.10c	nup60	utp16	-	SPBP8B7.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.166848275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769048	2538801	2542273	275382	278742	SPCC285.13c	SPAC17H9.13c	nup60	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.252440558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769049	2538801	2539434	275382	275997	SPCC285.13c	SPCC757.09c	nup60	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.307816178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769050	2538801	2541026	275382	277541	SPCC285.13c	SPBC337.09	nup60	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.18674307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769051	2538801	2542555	275382	279012	SPCC285.13c	SPAC1952.06c	nup60	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.053099752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769052	2538801	2540220	275382	276753	SPCC285.13c	SPBC337.03	nup60	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.885393134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769053	2538801	2539365	275382	275931	SPCC285.13c	SPCC24B10.16c	nup60	SPCC24B10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448291222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769054	2538801	2543685	275382	280099	SPCC285.13c	SPAC3C7.03c	nup60	rad55	-	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.062384809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769055	2538801	2541522	275382	278023	SPCC285.13c	SPAC23E2.01	nup60	fep1	-	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64372022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769056	2538801	2541021	275382	277536	SPCC285.13c	SPBC3B8.10c	nup60	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515019535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769057	2538801	2539023	275382	275596	SPCC285.13c	SPCC594.05c	nup60	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.21492789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769058	2538801	2542268	275382	278737	SPCC285.13c	SPAC17A5.07c	nup60	ulp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516269311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769059	2538801	2542036	275382	278518	SPCC285.13c	SPAC23A1.19c	nup60	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.672054811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769060	2538801	2543514	275382	279932	SPCC285.13c	SPAC4D7.03	nup60	pop2	-	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.922599212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769061	2538801	2541250	275382	277764	SPCC285.13c	SPBC8D2.17	nup60	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.986110304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769062	2538801	2542513	275382	278971	SPCC285.13c	SPAC1952.05	nup60	gcn5	-	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.333844363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769063	2538801	2542646	275382	279100	SPCC285.13c	SPAC11H11.05c	nup60	fta6	-	sma6	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.748284387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769064	2538801	2541776	275382	278270	SPCC285.13c	SPAC23H3.05c	nup60	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.742935419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769065	2538801	2539473	275382	276036	SPCC285.13c	SPCP25A2.02c	nup60	rhp26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.478199726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769066	2538801	2540647	275382	277172	SPCC285.13c	SPBC18H10.07	nup60	SPBC18H10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.268772266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769067	2538801	2539733	275382	276285	SPCC285.13c	SPBC16E9.12c	nup60	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.010256013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769068	2538801	2540673	275382	277198	SPCC285.13c	SPBC1D7.03	nup60	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.349883687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769069	2538801	2543396	275382	279818	SPCC285.13c	SPAC4D7.11	nup60	dsc4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.829058271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769070	2538801	2539667	275382	276222	SPCC285.13c	SPBC13G1.08c	nup60	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.747906753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769071	2538801	2542874	275382	279319	SPCC285.13c	SPAC20H4.09	nup60	SPAC20H4.09	-	SPAC145.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571368407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769072	2538801	2542007	275382	278490	SPCC285.13c	SPAC20H4.07	nup60	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.142281712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769073	2538801	2541142	275382	277657	SPCC285.13c	SPBC725.04	nup60	SPBC725.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449217876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769074	2538801	2541464	275382	277966	SPCC285.13c	SPAC222.08c	nup60	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.068694502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769075	2538801	2540967	275382	277483	SPCC285.13c	SPBC36B7.08c	nup60	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.777274303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769076	2538801	2538828	275382	275409	SPCC285.13c	SPCC1020.05	nup60	SPCC1020.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.245310197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769077	2538801	2541713	275382	278208	SPCC285.13c	SPAC3A12.12	nup60	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.30581795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769078	2538801	2541156	275382	277671	SPCC285.13c	SPBC685.07c	nup60	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.332972774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769079	2538801	2538762	275382	275345	SPCC285.13c	SPCC306.04c	nup60	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.763482657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769080	2538801	2543419	275382	279841	SPCC285.13c	SPAPB24D3.02c	nup60	SPAPB24D3.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.800337647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769081	2538801	2542883	275382	279328	SPCC285.13c	SPAC1486.04c	nup60	alm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.76482613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769082	2538801	2541121	275382	277636	SPCC285.13c	SPBC609.03	nup60	iqw1	-	iqwd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.030584339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769083	2538801	2542515	275382	278973	SPCC285.13c	SPAC1952.09c	nup60	SPAC1952.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579940569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769084	2538801	2540800	275382	277319	SPCC285.13c	SPBC409.20c	nup60	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.263256706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769085	2538801	2540702	275382	277226	SPCC285.13c	SPBC19F8.03c	nup60	yap18	-	SPBC19F8.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322077414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769086	2538801	2541531	275382	278031	SPCC285.13c	SPAC25A8.01c	nup60	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.892075981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769087	2538801	2539359	275382	275925	SPCC285.13c	SPCC16C4.06c	nup60	pus3	-	SPCC16C4.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813912891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769088	2538801	2543329	275382	279752	SPCC285.13c	SPAC56F8.02	nup60	SPAC56F8.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.449696721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769089	2538801	2541535	275382	278035	SPCC285.13c	SPAC12G12.10	nup60	wdr21	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036326177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769090	2538801	2539205	275382	275775	SPCC285.13c	SPCC4B3.15	nup60	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.343438793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769091	2538801	2539375	275382	275941	SPCC285.13c	SPCC4G3.11	nup60	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.660571118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769092	2538801	2542021	275382	278504	SPCC285.13c	SPAP14E8.02	nup60	tos4	-	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.475758474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769093	2538801	2543387	275382	279809	SPCC285.13c	SPAPB1E7.02c	nup60	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.662029095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769094	2538801	2538854	275382	275435	SPCC285.13c	SPCP1E11.05c	nup60	are2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708997098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769095	2538801	2543471	275382	279891	SPCC285.13c	SPAC513.07	nup60	SPAC513.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.208492314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769096	2538801	2543372	275382	279794	SPCC285.13c	SPAPB1A10.09	nup60	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.479459225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769097	2538801	2542656	275382	279110	SPCC285.13c	SPAC2E1P3.05c	nup60	SPAC2E1P3.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440755602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769098	2538801	2542617	275382	279071	SPCC285.13c	SPAC13A11.01c	nup60	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771914198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769099	2540945	2542207	277461	278682	SPBC342.06c	SPAC17H9.10c	rtt109	ddb1	kat11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.37068687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769100	2540945	2539050	277461	275623	SPBC342.06c	SPCC11E10.08	rtt109	rik1	kat11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049020108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769101	2540945	2541512	277461	278013	SPBC342.06c	SPAC11E3.08c	rtt109	nse6	kat11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449413491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769102	2540945	2541135	277461	277650	SPBC342.06c	SPBC839.03c	rtt109	SPBC839.03c	kat11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.485125249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769103	2540945	2539210	277461	275780	SPBC342.06c	SPCC2H8.05c	rtt109	dbl1	kat11	SPCC2H8.05c|SPCC63.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.840909509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769104	2540945	2539420	277461	275985	SPBC342.06c	SPCC970.07c	rtt109	raf2	kat11	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.242998425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769105	2540945	2538775	277461	275357	SPBC342.06c	SPCC23B6.05c	rtt109	ssb3	kat11	rpa3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.687983976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769106	2540945	2542555	277461	279012	SPBC342.06c	SPAC1952.06c	rtt109	SPAC1952.06c	kat11	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.943075584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769107	2540945	2542318	277461	278784	SPBC342.06c	SPAC16C9.05	rtt109	cph1	kat11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.382963382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769108	2540945	2540595	277461	277121	SPBC342.06c	SPBC21C3.02c	rtt109	dep1	kat11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.283138112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769109	2540945	2541643	277461	278139	SPBC342.06c	SPAC14C4.13	rtt109	rad17	kat11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.393322872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769110	2540945	2542981	277461	279419	SPBC342.06c	SPAC824.02	rtt109	bst1	kat11	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634751423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769111	2540945	2540825	277461	277343	SPBC342.06c	SPBC428.08c	rtt109	clr4	kat11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.20519485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769112	2540945	2542558	277461	279014	SPBC342.06c	SPAC1952.07	rtt109	rad1	kat11	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.93536355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769113	2540945	2542036	277461	278518	SPBC342.06c	SPAC23A1.19c	rtt109	hrq1	kat11	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.939793579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769114	2540945	2541801	277461	278292	SPBC342.06c	SPAC2F7.08c	rtt109	snf5	kat11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.555948097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769115	2540945	2540673	277461	277198	SPBC342.06c	SPBC1D7.03	rtt109	mug80	kat11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.307322271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769116	2540945	2541388	277461	277899	SPBC342.06c	SPBP8B7.30c	rtt109	thi5	kat11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77065259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769117	2540945	2542007	277461	278490	SPBC342.06c	SPAC20H4.07	rtt109	rad57	kat11	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.43627518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769118	2540945	2542710	277461	279163	SPBC342.06c	SPAC750.08c	rtt109	SPAC750.08c	kat11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.754194398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769119	2540945	2541900	277461	278390	SPBC342.06c	SPAC23H4.17c	rtt109	srb10	kat11	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.502016003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769120	2540945	2541746	277461	278240	SPBC342.06c	SPAC20G4.04c	rtt109	hus1	kat11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.14227275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769121	2540945	2539527	277461	276089	SPBC342.06c	SPCC338.16	rtt109	pof3	kat11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.568386053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769122	2540945	2538848	277461	275429	SPBC342.06c	SPCC613.12c	rtt109	raf1	kat11	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.202455584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769123	2540945	2540821	277461	277339	SPBC342.06c	SPBC800.03	rtt109	clr3	kat11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.474627586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769124	2540945	2541531	277461	278031	SPBC342.06c	SPAC25A8.01c	rtt109	fft3	kat11	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.477779175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769125	2540945	2540555	277461	277082	SPBC342.06c	SPBP16F5.02	rtt109	mcs2	kat11	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.120870447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769126	2540945	2541806	277461	278297	SPBC342.06c	SPAC4G8.13c	rtt109	prz1	kat11	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.671151032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769127	2540945	2542943	277461	279384	SPBC342.06c	SPBC1348.03	rtt109	SPBC1348.03	kat11	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.135249749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769128	2539208	2539235	275778	275805	SPCC1450.11c	SPCC1682.15	cek1	mug122	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870137615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769129	2539208	2540929	275778	277445	SPCC1450.11c	SPBC354.03	cek1	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.785266535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769130	2539208	2542277	275778	278746	SPCC1450.11c	SPAC17A5.02c	cek1	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.747245671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769131	2539208	2541801	275778	278292	SPCC1450.11c	SPAC2F7.08c	cek1	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.963086416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769132	2539208	2541156	275778	277671	SPCC1450.11c	SPBC685.07c	cek1	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.624602013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769133	2540872	2539965	277389	276509	SPBC543.08	SPBC1685.14c	SPBC543.08	SPBC1685.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.993725939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769134	2540872	2539467	277389	276030	SPBC543.08	SPCC417.07c	SPBC543.08	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.136239502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769135	2540872	2542710	277389	279163	SPBC543.08	SPAC750.08c	SPBC543.08	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.313262018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769136	2540872	2539368	277389	275934	SPBC543.08	SPCC16A11.07	SPBC543.08	coq10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.583858097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769137	2540872	2542826	277389	279273	SPBC543.08	SPAC13G6.09	SPBC543.08	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.570870267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769138	2540872	2539375	277389	275941	SPBC543.08	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC543.08	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.158450119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769139	2540872	2542716	277389	279169	SPBC543.08	SPAC25H1.07	SPBC543.08	emc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.383894471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769140	2540872	2542943	277389	279384	SPBC543.08	SPBC1348.03	SPBC543.08	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.988786305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769141	2543510	2539584	279928	276143	SPAC30D11.07	SPCC63.03	nth1	SPCC63.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866147252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769142	2543510	2542585	279928	279040	SPAC30D11.07	SPAC31A2.13c	nth1	sft1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392599824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769143	2543510	2541512	279928	278013	SPAC30D11.07	SPAC11E3.08c	nth1	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.194826808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769144	2543510	2541913	279928	278403	SPAC30D11.07	SPAC227.04	nth1	atg10	-	SPAC227.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775083213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769145	2543510	2543414	279928	279836	SPAC30D11.07	SPAC630.10	nth1	SPAC630.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513104241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769146	2543510	2542107	279928	278583	SPAC30D11.07	SPAC30.01c	nth1	sec72	-	sec7b|sec702	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379493098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769147	2543510	2543685	279928	280099	SPAC30D11.07	SPAC3C7.03c	nth1	rad55	-	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.163003591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769148	2543510	2542558	279928	279014	SPAC30D11.07	SPAC1952.07	nth1	rad1	-	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.045342878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769149	2543510	2540348	279928	276877	SPAC30D11.07	SPBC29A10.05	nth1	exo1	-	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.856084254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769150	2543510	2540326	279928	276856	SPAC30D11.07	SPBC2G5.06c	nth1	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.072987566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769151	2543510	2542007	279928	278490	SPAC30D11.07	SPAC20H4.07	nth1	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.561508271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769152	2543510	2539974	279928	276518	SPAC30D11.07	SPBC32H8.07	nth1	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.912000899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769153	2543510	2540394	279928	276922	SPAC30D11.07	SPBC2D10.09	nth1	snr1	-	SPBC2D10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.876077484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769154	2543510	2540229	279928	276761	SPAC30D11.07	SPBC31F10.15c	nth1	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.347130869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769155	2543510	2541746	279928	278240	SPAC30D11.07	SPAC20G4.04c	nth1	hus1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.606397709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769156	2543510	3361520	279928	280596	SPAC30D11.07	SPAC1610.02c	nth1	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.454176583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769157	2543510	2542940	279928	279381	SPAC30D11.07	SPAC31A2.12	nth1	SPAC31A2.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.06018435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769158	2543510	2538916	279928	275493	SPAC30D11.07	SPCC16C4.17	nth1	mug123	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.995049925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769159	2543510	2542119	279928	278595	SPAC30D11.07	SPAC1834.08	nth1	mak1	-	phk3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.837413807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769160	2542978	2538710	279416	275294	SPAC10F6.02c	SPCC1020.12c	prp22	xap5	-	SPCC14G10.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781087257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769161	2542978	2542468	279416	278929	SPAC10F6.02c	SPAC1D4.09c	prp22	rtf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708835745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769162	2542978	2543308	279416	279732	SPAC10F6.02c	SPAC694.04c	prp22	SPAC694.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.457382377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769163	2542978	2541801	279416	278292	SPAC10F6.02c	SPAC2F7.08c	prp22	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.038009858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769164	2542978	2542976	279416	279414	SPAC10F6.02c	SPAC9E9.09c	prp22	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712122097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769165	2542978	5802861	279416	857999	SPAC10F6.02c	SPAC1D4.01	prp22	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.680656135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769166	2542978	2543457	279416	279877	SPAC10F6.02c	SPAC3H1.03	prp22	mug151	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.319076407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769167	2542978	2542222	279416	278695	SPAC10F6.02c	SPAC31G5.18c	prp22	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.441628394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769168	2542978	2543427	279416	279847	SPAC10F6.02c	SPAPB1A10.15	prp22	arv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.631744131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769169	2543658	2542892	280072	279336	SPAC644.09	SPAC13F5.04c	SPAC644.09	vta1	-	SPAC13F5.04c|new6|SPAC13F5.08|vts1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.836183169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769170	2543658	2540999	280072	277515	SPAC644.09	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC644.09	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038049185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769171	2543658	2542273	280072	278742	SPAC644.09	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC644.09	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.311670516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769172	2543658	2542689	280072	279142	SPAC644.09	SPAC29B12.04	SPAC644.09	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.776749886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769173	2543658	2542791	280072	279240	SPAC644.09	SPAC167.04	SPAC644.09	pam17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647418921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769174	2543658	2542268	280072	278737	SPAC644.09	SPAC17A5.07c	SPAC644.09	ulp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.710594492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769175	2543658	2543020	280072	279456	SPAC644.09	SPAC10F6.13c	SPAC644.09	SPAC10F6.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.830457444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769176	2543658	2542177	280072	278652	SPAC644.09	SPAC17H9.08	SPAC644.09	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.626448636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769177	2543658	2539733	280072	276285	SPAC644.09	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC644.09	pab2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.904328014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769178	2543658	2541900	280072	278390	SPAC644.09	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC644.09	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.800755226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769179	2543658	2541464	280072	277966	SPAC644.09	SPAC222.08c	SPAC644.09	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.453948825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769180	2543658	2542550	280072	279007	SPAC644.09	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC644.09	SPAC1B3.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.956385658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769181	2543661	2543064	280075	279497	SPAC644.08	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC644.08	hrp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.451945016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769182	2543661	2541117	280075	277632	SPAC644.08	SPBC646.13	SPAC644.08	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930705749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769183	2543661	2538922	280075	275499	SPAC644.08	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC644.08	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.4412236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769184	2543661	2542568	280075	279024	SPAC644.08	SPAC1952.02	SPAC644.08	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.077836306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769185	2543661	2542268	280075	278737	SPAC644.08	SPAC17A5.07c	SPAC644.08	ulp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.608980688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769186	2543661	2542177	280075	278652	SPAC644.08	SPAC17H9.08	SPAC644.08	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.830794203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769187	2543661	2541496	280075	277998	SPAC644.08	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC644.08	arp42	-	arp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.851030762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769188	2543661	2542055	280075	278534	SPAC644.08	SPAC6G9.03c	SPAC644.08	mug183	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.306993201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769189	2543661	2540064	280075	276602	SPAC644.08	SPBC1718.02	SPAC644.08	hop1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.942118649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769190	2543661	2543516	280075	279934	SPAC644.08	SPAC4F10.11	SPAC644.08	spn1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.077592651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769191	2539249	2540885	275819	277402	SPCC1450.05c	SPBC660.14	rox3	mik1	med19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.201177101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769192	2539249	2541512	275819	278013	SPCC1450.05c	SPAC11E3.08c	rox3	nse6	med19	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048817856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769193	2539249	2540913	275819	277429	SPCC1450.05c	SPBC56F2.08c	rox3	SPBC56F2.08c	med19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.750408514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769194	2539249	2543432	275819	279852	SPCC1450.05c	SPAC4G8.05	rox3	ppk14	med19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.433165969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769195	2539249	2540455	275819	276983	SPCC1450.05c	SPBC215.05	rox3	gpd1	med19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.973088078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769196	2539249	2540999	275819	277515	SPCC1450.05c	SPBC4B4.04	rox3	SPBC4B4.04	med19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.550538963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769197	2539249	2540979	275819	277495	SPCC1450.05c	SPBC3H7.10	rox3	elp6	med19	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925468502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769198	2539249	2538847	275819	275428	SPCC1450.05c	SPCC594.06c	rox3	SPCC594.06c	med19	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866339682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769199	2539249	2539434	275819	275997	SPCC1450.05c	SPCC757.09c	rox3	rnc1	med19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.008428527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769200	2539249	2540929	275819	277445	SPCC1450.05c	SPBC354.03	rox3	swd3	med19	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.448668589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769201	2539249	2540425	275819	276953	SPCC1450.05c	SPBC27.06c	rox3	mgr2	med19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.768617075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769202	2539249	2541643	275819	278139	SPCC1450.05c	SPAC14C4.13	rox3	rad17	med19	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.351122573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769203	2539249	2543563	275819	279979	SPCC1450.05c	SPAC664.02c	rox3	arp8	med19	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.26126318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769204	2539249	2541522	275819	278023	SPCC1450.05c	SPAC23E2.01	rox3	fep1	med19	gaf2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.100058233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769205	2539249	2543426	275819	279846	SPCC1450.05c	SPAC631.02	rox3	bdf2	med19	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.074940126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769206	2539249	2542791	275819	279240	SPCC1450.05c	SPAC167.04	rox3	pam17	med19	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.712621593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769207	2539249	2540825	275819	277343	SPCC1450.05c	SPBC428.08c	rox3	clr4	med19	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.130689378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769208	2539249	2543020	275819	279456	SPCC1450.05c	SPAC10F6.13c	rox3	SPAC10F6.13c	med19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.846098196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769209	2539249	2540396	275819	276924	SPCC1450.05c	SPBC31F10.12	rox3	tma20	med19	SPBC31F10.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.11749306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769210	2539249	2542543	275819	279000	SPCC1450.05c	SPAC30D11.11	rox3	SPAC30D11.11	med19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711716837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769211	2539249	2543396	275819	279818	SPCC1450.05c	SPAC4D7.11	rox3	dsc4	med19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979190117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769212	2539249	2540350	275819	276879	SPCC1450.05c	SPBC317.01	rox3	mbx2	med19	pvg4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.190653277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769213	2539249	2539667	275819	276222	SPCC1450.05c	SPBC13G1.08c	rox3	ash2	med19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.759203736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769214	2539249	2542032	275819	278514	SPCC1450.05c	SPAC23C11.04c	rox3	pnk1	med19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.375168024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769215	2539249	2541614	275819	278111	SPCC1450.05c	SPAC29A4.20	rox3	elp3	med19	kat9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.32552195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769216	2539249	2538848	275819	275429	SPCC1450.05c	SPCC613.12c	rox3	raf1	med19	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.713578053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769217	2539249	2539101	275819	275673	SPCC1450.05c	SPCC736.04c	rox3	gma12	med19	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.902891193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769218	2539249	2542516	275819	278974	SPCC1450.05c	SPAC2F7.04	rox3	pmc2	med19	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.073036797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769219	2539249	2541175	275819	277689	SPCC1450.05c	SPBC839.13c	rox3	rpl1601	med19	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.350170088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769220	2539249	2540779	275819	277298	SPCC1450.05c	SPBC19F8.06c	rox3	meu22	med19	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817811412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769221	2539249	2543662	275819	280076	SPCC1450.05c	SPAC9.07c	rox3	SPAC9.07c	med19	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817912624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769222	2539249	2542458	275819	278919	SPCC1450.05c	SPAC30.02c	rox3	SPAC30.02c	med19	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981786262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769223	2539249	2540829	275819	277347	SPCC1450.05c	SPBC800.09	rox3	sum2	med19	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.84367518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769224	2539249	2541229	275819	277743	SPCC1450.05c	SPBC839.05c	rox3	rps1701	med19	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.384998781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769225	2539249	2539726	275819	276278	SPCC1450.05c	SPBC13E7.08c	rox3	leo1	med19	SPBC13E7.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.800141194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769226	2539249	2538792	275819	275373	SPCC1450.05c	SPCP1E11.10	rox3	SPCP1E11.10	med19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.99320243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769227	2539249	2540108	275819	276645	SPCC1450.05c	SPBC13E7.11	rox3	rbd1	med19	SPBC13E7.11|rh1|SPBC30D10.19c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515070646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769228	2539249	2541806	275819	278297	SPCC1450.05c	SPAC4G8.13c	rox3	prz1	med19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.564911771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769229	2539249	2540208	275819	276741	SPCC1450.05c	SPBC9B6.03	rox3	SPBC9B6.03	med19	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81687228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769230	2539249	2541062	275819	277577	SPCC1450.05c	SPBC660.11	rox3	tcg1	med19	mug187	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200582225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769231	2539818	2538939	276368	275514	SPBC11C11.08	SPCC1672.04c	srp1	SPCC1672.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567339599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769232	2539818	2542895	276368	279339	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC13G6.10c	srp1	asl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571038586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769233	2539818	2538961	276368	275535	SPBC11C11.08	SPCC285.14	srp1	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.745809219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769234	2539818	2542598	276368	279052	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC6G10.08	srp1	idp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328044911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769235	2539818	2541343	276368	277854	SPBC11C11.08	SPBPB2B2.19c	srp1	SPBPB2B2.19c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.37285053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769236	2539818	2541512	276368	278013	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC11E3.08c	srp1	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.836925255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769237	2539818	2538977	276368	275551	SPBC11C11.08	SPCC1020.06c	srp1	tal1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.060698854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769238	2539818	2541818	276368	278309	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC11G7.02	srp1	pub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.841394766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769239	2539818	2542378	276368	278842	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC1805.04	srp1	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.049215556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769240	2539818	2539930	276368	276474	SPBC11C11.08	SPBC1198.11c	srp1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.788679855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769241	2539818	2540694	276368	277218	SPBC11C11.08	SPBC19C7.10	srp1	bqt4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.908054401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769242	2539818	2542701	276368	279154	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC26H5.05	srp1	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.250923962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769243	2539818	2538922	276368	275499	SPBC11C11.08	SPCC16C4.10	srp1	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.126995178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769244	2539818	2539226	276368	275796	SPBC11C11.08	SPCC16C4.20c	srp1	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.751373858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769245	2539818	2540975	276368	277491	SPBC11C11.08	SPBC354.12	srp1	gpd3	-	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.337056885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769246	2539818	2542468	276368	278929	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC1D4.09c	srp1	rtf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.747348802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769247	2539818	2538847	276368	275428	SPBC11C11.08	SPCC594.06c	srp1	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811867853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769248	2539818	2539564	276368	276125	SPBC11C11.08	SPCC550.12	srp1	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.196574064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769249	2539818	2542848	276368	279294	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC9G1.03c	srp1	rpl3001	-	rpl30|rpl30-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32868272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769250	2539818	2541026	276368	277541	SPBC11C11.08	SPBC337.09	srp1	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387504499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769251	2539818	2542012	276368	278495	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC23C11.02c	srp1	rps23	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331141794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769252	2539818	2540463	276368	276991	SPBC11C11.08	SPBC2F12.15c	srp1	pfa3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.346229029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769253	2539818	2542969	276368	279409	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC4G8.10	srp1	gos1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.686813988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769254	2539818	2539129	276368	275701	SPBC11C11.08	SPCC338.14	srp1	ado1	-	SPCC338.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.871824618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769255	2539818	2543426	276368	279846	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC631.02	srp1	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.973944876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769256	2539818	2540415	276368	276943	SPBC11C11.08	SPBC30B4.06c	srp1	SPBC30B4.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.491539608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769257	2539818	2542981	276368	279419	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC824.02	srp1	bst1	-	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.977817208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769258	2539818	3361543	276368	280619	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC9.13c	srp1	cwf16	-	SPAPJ735.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.823601897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769259	2539818	2540964	276368	277480	SPBC11C11.08	SPBC365.16	srp1	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.99277945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769260	2539818	2539310	276368	275877	SPBC11C11.08	SPCC285.17	srp1	spp27	-	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.92246382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769261	2539818	2542036	276368	278518	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC23A1.19c	srp1	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.576825044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769262	2539818	2539098	276368	275670	SPBC11C11.08	SPCC24B10.18	srp1	SPCC24B10.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568765787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769263	2539818	2542950	276368	279390	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC12B10.03	srp1	bun62	-	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.721734073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769264	2539818	2541741	276368	278235	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC20G4.02c	srp1	fus1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.249683499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769265	2539818	2540631	276368	277157	SPBC11C11.08	SPBC25B2.10	srp1	SPBC25B2.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706287106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769266	2539818	2541982	276368	278467	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC23A1.06c	srp1	cmk2	-	mkp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.929207431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769267	2539818	2542249	276368	278719	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC30D11.14c	srp1	SPAC30D11.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.929951903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769268	2539818	2541160	276368	277675	SPBC11C11.08	SPBC725.09c	srp1	hob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.247908819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769269	2539818	2542507	276368	278965	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC18G6.13	srp1	SPAC18G6.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.76670579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769270	2539818	2540673	276368	277198	SPBC11C11.08	SPBC1D7.03	srp1	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.758384672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769271	2539818	2541889	276368	278379	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC2F7.03c	srp1	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573308827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769272	2539818	2543396	276368	279818	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC4D7.11	srp1	dsc4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326075836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769273	2539818	2540538	276368	277065	SPBC11C11.08	SPBC26H8.03	srp1	cho2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.394535923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769274	2539818	2540836	276368	277354	SPBC11C11.08	SPBC18H10.19	srp1	vps38	-	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.984088398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769275	2539818	2542254	276368	278724	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC30D11.04c	srp1	nup124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323246359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769276	2539818	2542519	276368	278977	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC19G12.08	srp1	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.776646706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769277	2539818	2540990	276368	277506	SPBC11C11.08	SPBC36B7.06c	srp1	mug20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385505956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769278	2539818	2541708	276368	278203	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC31A2.02	srp1	trm112	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.060940581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769279	2539818	2540967	276368	277483	SPBC11C11.08	SPBC36B7.08c	srp1	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.136328328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769280	2539818	2540599	276368	277125	SPBC11C11.08	SPBC29A3.10c	srp1	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.267274851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769281	2539818	2540533	276368	277061	SPBC11C11.08	SPBC29A10.16c	srp1	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.813898769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769282	2539818	2541927	276368	278415	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC222.12c	srp1	atp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.837038606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769283	2539818	2539569	276368	276129	SPBC11C11.08	SPCPB16A4.03c	srp1	ade10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.924086773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769284	2539818	2539527	276368	276089	SPBC11C11.08	SPCC338.16	srp1	pof3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509599404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769285	2539818	2541017	276368	277532	SPBC11C11.08	SPBC36.07	srp1	elp1	-	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.461466439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769286	2539818	2540001	276368	276545	SPBC11C11.08	SPBC1289.13c	srp1	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.310210987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769287	2539818	2542327	276368	278793	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC16C9.06c	srp1	upf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.466609039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769288	2539818	2540498	276368	277026	SPBC11C11.08	SPBC27.02c	srp1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.072842176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769289	2539818	2539159	276368	275731	SPBC11C11.08	SPCC1235.01	srp1	SPCC1235.01	-	SPCC320.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.852134608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769290	2539818	2540998	276368	277514	SPBC11C11.08	SPBC3D6.05	srp1	ptp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632299381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769291	2539818	2540346	276368	276875	SPBC11C11.08	SPBC2F12.03c	srp1	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.37446848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769292	2539818	2541678	276368	278174	SPBC11C11.08	SPAP7G5.05	srp1	rpl1002	-	rpl10|rpl10-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.746516207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769293	2539818	2542418	276368	278881	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC1805.07c	srp1	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.520518037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769294	2539818	2539514	276368	276076	SPBC11C11.08	SPCC663.14c	srp1	trp663	-	SPCC663.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049147013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769295	2539818	2539668	276368	276223	SPBC11C11.08	SPBC11B10.10c	srp1	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.91944575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769296	2539818	2539928	276368	276472	SPBC11C11.08	SPBC1604.08c	srp1	imp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.750795695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769297	2539818	2540504	276368	277032	SPBC11C11.08	SPBC24C6.10c	srp1	dip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.311941358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769298	2539818	2543220	276368	279648	SPBC11C11.08	SPAPB21F2.02	srp1	SPAPB21F2.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.760085484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769299	2539818	2541806	276368	278297	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC4G8.13c	srp1	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.722649801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769300	2539818	2543387	276368	279809	SPBC11C11.08	SPAPB1E7.02c	srp1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.76259332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769301	2539818	2543327	276368	279750	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC1D4.06c	srp1	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.250732612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769302	2539818	2542424	276368	278886	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC1805.14	srp1	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.876260559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769303	2539818	2541478	276368	277980	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC2F7.17	srp1	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.376761497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769304	2539818	2540309	276368	276839	SPBC11C11.08	SPBC21B10.13c	srp1	yox1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.962153978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769305	2540919	2541475	277435	277977	SPBC543.07	SPAC24B11.09	pek1	mpc2	mkk1|skh1	SPAC24B11.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773739012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769306	2540919	2540060	277435	276598	SPBC543.07	SPBC106.01	pek1	mph1	mkk1|skh1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.893812246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769307	2540919	2540105	277435	276642	SPBC543.07	SPBC106.04	pek1	ada1	mkk1|skh1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.056759869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769308	2540919	2542598	277435	279052	SPBC543.07	SPAC6G10.08	pek1	idp1	mkk1|skh1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.190869508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769309	2540919	2541426	277435	277931	SPBC543.07	SPAC227.06	pek1	SPAC227.06	mkk1|skh1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044346327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769310	2540919	2541912	277435	278402	SPBC543.07	SPAC222.16c	pek1	csn3	mkk1|skh1	SPAC821.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.45455228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769311	2540919	2539301	277435	275869	SPBC543.07	SPCC622.03c	pek1	SPCC622.03c	mkk1|skh1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328982202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769312	2540919	2541633	277435	278129	SPBC543.07	SPAC664.01c	pek1	swi6	mkk1|skh1	SPAC824.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.888868366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769313	2540919	2539420	277435	275985	SPBC543.07	SPCC970.07c	pek1	raf2	mkk1|skh1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925403508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769314	2540919	2541205	277435	277719	SPBC543.07	SPBC839.02	pek1	SPBC839.02	mkk1|skh1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.117530333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769315	2540919	2542714	277435	279167	SPBC543.07	SPAC5H10.06c	pek1	adh4	mkk1|skh1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811241069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769316	2540919	2539235	277435	275805	SPBC543.07	SPCC1682.15	pek1	mug122	mkk1|skh1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641950727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769317	2540919	2542689	277435	279142	SPBC543.07	SPAC29B12.04	pek1	snz1	mkk1|skh1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045326478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769318	2540919	2539334	277435	275900	SPBC543.07	SPCC285.05	pek1	SPCC285.05	mkk1|skh1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382594528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769319	2540919	2541026	277435	277541	SPBC543.07	SPBC337.09	pek1	erg28	mkk1|skh1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.880043736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769320	2540919	2541346	277435	277857	SPBC543.07	SPBP8B7.08c	pek1	ppm1	mkk1|skh1	SPBP8B7.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984139005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769321	2540919	2542022	277435	278505	SPBC543.07	SPAC23A1.03	pek1	apt1	mkk1|skh1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638679131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769322	2540919	2542318	277435	278784	SPBC543.07	SPAC16C9.05	pek1	cph1	mkk1|skh1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.348772019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769323	2540919	2542277	277435	278746	SPBC543.07	SPAC17A5.02c	pek1	dbr1	mkk1|skh1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.02910254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769324	2540919	2543563	277435	279979	SPBC543.07	SPAC664.02c	pek1	arp8	mkk1|skh1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.024689493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769325	2540919	2540825	277435	277343	SPBC543.07	SPBC428.08c	pek1	clr4	mkk1|skh1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.158662572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769326	2540919	2540964	277435	277480	SPBC543.07	SPBC365.16	pek1	SPBC365.16	mkk1|skh1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.192851781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769327	2540919	2542568	277435	279024	SPBC543.07	SPAC1952.02	pek1	tma23	mkk1|skh1	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.662043206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769328	2540919	2542311	277435	278777	SPBC543.07	SPAC16A10.05c	pek1	dad1	mkk1|skh1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.720643826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769329	2540919	2539051	277435	275624	SPBC543.07	SPCC1183.11	pek1	msy1	mkk1|skh1	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77757623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769330	2540919	2542177	277435	278652	SPBC543.07	SPAC17H9.08	pek1	SPAC17H9.08	mkk1|skh1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388464556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769331	2540919	2541250	277435	277764	SPBC543.07	SPBC8D2.17	pek1	gmh4	mkk1|skh1	SPBC8D2.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042632042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769332	2540919	2543412	277435	279834	SPBC543.07	SPAC637.07	pek1	moe1	mkk1|skh1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578974447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769333	2540919	2540673	277435	277198	SPBC543.07	SPBC1D7.03	pek1	mug80	mkk1|skh1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.447628046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769334	2540919	2541889	277435	278379	SPBC543.07	SPAC2F7.03c	pek1	pom1	mkk1|skh1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.555016629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769335	2540919	2542168	277435	278643	SPBC543.07	SPAC17A5.16	pek1	ftp105	mkk1|skh1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377894288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769336	2540919	2542921	277435	279362	SPBC543.07	SPAC1093.01	pek1	ppr5	mkk1|skh1	SPAC12B10.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.777146524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769337	2540919	2542469	277435	278930	SPBC543.07	SPAC19A8.04	pek1	erg5	mkk1|skh1	cyp61	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.395327882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769338	2540919	2543117	277435	279549	SPBC543.07	SPAC806.08c	pek1	mod21	mkk1|skh1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.397799439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769339	2540919	2542902	277435	279346	SPBC543.07	SPAC144.05	pek1	SPAC144.05	mkk1|skh1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.162626153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769340	2540919	2540665	277435	277190	SPBC543.07	SPBC83.02c	pek1	rpl4302	mkk1|skh1	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.012619419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769341	2540919	2542710	277435	279163	SPBC543.07	SPAC750.08c	pek1	SPAC750.08c	mkk1|skh1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.635388977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769342	2540919	2541720	277435	278214	SPBC543.07	SPAC23H3.13c	pek1	gpa2	mkk1|skh1	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.278200914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769343	2540919	2538841	277435	275422	SPBC543.07	SPCC550.03c	pek1	SPCC550.03c	mkk1|skh1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.380796236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769344	2540919	2542549	277435	279006	SPBC543.07	SPAC19A8.11c	pek1	SPAC19A8.11c	mkk1|skh1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.133025153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769345	2540919	2540990	277435	277506	SPBC543.07	SPBC36B7.06c	pek1	mug20	mkk1|skh1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.917666253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769346	2540919	2543517	277435	279935	SPBC543.07	SPAC3G9.05	pek1	spa2	mkk1|skh1	SPAC3G9.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.249793376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769347	2540919	2541296	277435	277808	SPBC543.07	SPBP8B7.06	pek1	rpp201	mkk1|skh1	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377589718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769348	2540919	2541186	277435	277700	SPBC543.07	SPBC725.01	pek1	SPBC725.01	mkk1|skh1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.899086118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769349	2540919	2541614	277435	278111	SPBC543.07	SPAC29A4.20	pek1	elp3	mkk1|skh1	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.60239306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769350	2540919	2541786	277435	278278	SPBC543.07	SPAC22F3.08c	pek1	rok1	mkk1|skh1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.306602665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769351	2540919	2542759	277435	279209	SPBC543.07	SPAC9G1.07	pek1	SPAC9G1.07	mkk1|skh1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933320064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769352	2540919	2541287	277435	277800	SPBC543.07	SPBP22H7.05c	pek1	abo2	mkk1|skh1	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.898155525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769353	2540919	2541175	277435	277689	SPBC543.07	SPBC839.13c	pek1	rpl1601	mkk1|skh1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.302389615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769354	2540919	2540061	277435	276599	SPBC543.07	SPBC119.12	pek1	rud3	mkk1|skh1	SPBC119.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86998927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769355	2540919	2541909	277435	278399	SPBC543.07	SPAC227.01c	pek1	erd1	mkk1|skh1	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.331237659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769356	2540919	2539108	277435	275680	SPBC543.07	SPCC1223.02	pek1	nmt1	mkk1|skh1	thi3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781696036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769357	2540919	2540881	277435	277398	SPBC543.07	SPBC577.14c	pek1	spa1	mkk1|skh1	spa	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.401985795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769358	2540919	2543160	277435	279591	SPBC543.07	SPAC31A2.14	pek1	bun107	mkk1|skh1	wdr48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.866929702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769359	2540919	2541432	277435	277937	SPBC543.07	SPAC1F5.05c	pek1	mso1	mkk1|skh1	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.981549434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769360	2540919	2543525	277435	279943	SPBC543.07	SPAC4A8.14	pek1	SPAC4A8.14	mkk1|skh1	prs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.059260258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769361	2540919	2539169	277435	275740	SPBC543.07	SPCC1235.11	pek1	mpc1	mkk1|skh1	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.375739494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769362	2540919	2542716	277435	279169	SPBC543.07	SPAC25H1.07	pek1	emc1	mkk1|skh1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380932289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769363	2540919	2541357	277435	277868	SPBC543.07	SPBPB7E8.01	pek1	SPBPB7E8.01	mkk1|skh1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330359753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769364	2540919	2541806	277435	278297	SPBC543.07	SPAC4G8.13c	pek1	prz1	mkk1|skh1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.131456668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769365	2540919	2541472	277435	277974	SPBC543.07	SPAC589.11	pek1	pth4	mkk1|skh1	mug82	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05139351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769366	2540919	2541778	277435	278271	SPBC543.07	SPAC23G3.05c	pek1	SPAC23G3.05c	mkk1|skh1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926790267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769367	2540919	2541869	277435	278359	SPBC543.07	SPAC22F3.13	pek1	tsc1	mkk1|skh1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.432409864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769368	2540919	2543333	277435	279756	SPBC543.07	SPAC694.02	pek1	SPAC694.02	mkk1|skh1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913712805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769369	2540919	2542943	277435	279384	SPBC543.07	SPBC1348.03	pek1	SPBC1348.03	mkk1|skh1	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.125883566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769370	2540919	2541062	277435	277577	SPBC543.07	SPBC660.11	pek1	tcg1	mkk1|skh1	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.747512119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769371	2540919	2540734	277435	277257	SPBC543.07	SPBC19G7.09	pek1	ulp1	mkk1|skh1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.37912287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769372	2541671	2540913	278167	277429	SPAC10F6.14c	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC10F6.14c	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445416577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769373	2541671	2540491	278167	277019	SPAC10F6.14c	SPBC28E12.04	SPAC10F6.14c	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701369145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769374	2541671	2539937	278167	276481	SPAC10F6.14c	SPBC1539.08	SPAC10F6.14c	arf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.131819623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769375	2541671	2540831	278167	277349	SPAC10F6.14c	SPBC428.02c	SPAC10F6.14c	eca39	-	SPBC582.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331189024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769376	2541671	2540086	278167	276624	SPAC10F6.14c	SPBC16H5.12c	SPAC10F6.14c	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573802987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769377	2541671	2539368	278167	275934	SPAC10F6.14c	SPCC16A11.07	SPAC10F6.14c	coq10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439515194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769378	2541671	2540882	278167	277399	SPAC10F6.14c	SPBC4F6.08c	SPAC10F6.14c	mrpl39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.325898172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769379	2541671	2541798	278167	278289	SPAC10F6.14c	SPAC22F3.03c	SPAC10F6.14c	rdh54	-	mug34|tid1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568380278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769380	2541671	2542516	278167	278974	SPAC10F6.14c	SPAC2F7.04	SPAC10F6.14c	pmc2	-	med1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.15252971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769381	2541671	2543304	278167	279728	SPAC10F6.14c	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC10F6.14c	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.43876983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769382	2541671	2539136	278167	275708	SPAC10F6.14c	SPCC1919.05	SPAC10F6.14c	SPCC1919.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872550403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769383	2541671	2542826	278167	279273	SPAC10F6.14c	SPAC13G6.09	SPAC10F6.14c	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32089134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769384	2541671	2540310	278167	276840	SPAC10F6.14c	SPBC29B5.04c	SPAC10F6.14c	SPBC29B5.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.260462948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769385	2541671	2542571	278167	279027	SPAC10F6.14c	SPAC589.02c	SPAC10F6.14c	med13	-	spTrap240|srb9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.195860788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769386	2540057	2541104	276595	277619	SPBC16H5.10c	SPBC6B1.03c	prp43	SPBC6B1.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326251173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769387	2540057	2540694	276595	277218	SPBC16H5.10c	SPBC19C7.10	prp43	bqt4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.117081465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769388	2540057	2540160	276595	276695	SPBC16H5.10c	SPBC1773.17c	prp43	SPBC1773.17c	-	SPBP26C9.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.309371846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769389	2540057	2540463	276595	276991	SPBC16H5.10c	SPBC2F12.15c	prp43	pfa3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.629003662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769390	2540057	2540676	276595	277201	SPBC16H5.10c	SPBC3E7.11c	prp43	SPBC3E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.838177729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769391	2540057	2542981	276595	279419	SPBC16H5.10c	SPAC824.02	prp43	bst1	-	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.057287813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769392	2540057	2539705	276595	276258	SPBC16H5.10c	SPBC1105.10	prp43	rav1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.991007501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769393	2540057	2541801	276595	278292	SPBC16H5.10c	SPAC2F7.08c	prp43	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.632427172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769394	2540057	2541776	276595	278270	SPBC16H5.10c	SPAC23H3.05c	prp43	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.831137101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769395	2540057	2539667	276595	276222	SPBC16H5.10c	SPBC13G1.08c	prp43	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.41002015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769396	2540057	2541144	276595	277659	SPBC16H5.10c	SPBC685.06	prp43	rps001	-	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.556596199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769397	2540057	2542806	276595	279254	SPBC16H5.10c	SPAC1610.01	prp43	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.544252909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769398	2540057	2538762	276595	275345	SPBC16H5.10c	SPCC306.04c	prp43	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.791007375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769399	2540057	2540619	276595	277145	SPBC16H5.10c	SPBC25H2.15	prp43	SPBC25H2.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.112470756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769400	2540057	2542222	276595	278695	SPBC16H5.10c	SPAC31G5.18c	prp43	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.888808163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769401	2540057	2540928	276595	277444	SPBC16H5.10c	SPBC3E7.10	prp43	fma1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38026187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769402	2540057	2541124	276595	277639	SPBC16H5.10c	SPBC646.02	prp43	cwf11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.037608265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769403	2539499	2543064	276062	279497	SPCC622.08c	SPAC3G6.01	hta1	hrp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.232972846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769404	2539499	2543339	276062	279762	SPCC622.08c	SPAC630.13c	hta1	tsc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.903665597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769405	2539499	2542677	276062	279130	SPCC622.08c	SPAC26F1.10c	hta1	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.333517233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769406	2539499	2542273	276062	278742	SPCC622.08c	SPAC17H9.13c	hta1	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.348047114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769407	2539499	2542318	276062	278784	SPCC622.08c	SPAC16C9.05	hta1	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.717446664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769408	2539499	2542220	276062	278694	SPCC622.08c	SPAC1A6.03c	hta1	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869131189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769409	2539499	2543563	276062	279979	SPCC622.08c	SPAC664.02c	hta1	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.06019078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769410	2539499	2542311	276062	278777	SPCC622.08c	SPAC16A10.05c	hta1	dad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.69294706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769411	2539499	2539705	276062	276258	SPCC622.08c	SPBC1105.10	hta1	rav1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.455865406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769412	2539499	2540352	276062	276881	SPCC622.08c	SPBC215.03c	hta1	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.752424026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769413	2539499	2540967	276062	277483	SPCC622.08c	SPBC36B7.08c	hta1	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978622213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769414	2539499	2538690	276062	275275	SPCC622.08c	SPCC1393.05	hta1	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.599556441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769415	2539499	3361520	276062	280596	SPCC622.08c	SPAC1610.02c	hta1	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.084633673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769416	2539499	2540498	276062	277026	SPCC622.08c	SPBC27.02c	hta1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771200172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769417	2539499	2541531	276062	278031	SPCC622.08c	SPAC25A8.01c	hta1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.239441688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769418	2539499	2542826	276062	279273	SPCC622.08c	SPAC13G6.09	hta1	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.342375416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769419	2539499	2542094	276062	278571	SPCC622.08c	SPAC29B12.06c	hta1	rcd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.613271305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769420	2538762	2542895	275345	279339	SPCC306.04c	SPAC13G6.10c	set1	asl1	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.262626559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769421	2538762	2542430	275345	278892	SPCC306.04c	SPAC17G6.06	set1	rps2401	kmt2	rps24|rps24-1|rps24a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.508657768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769422	2538762	2538961	275345	275535	SPCC306.04c	SPCC285.14	set1	trs130	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.299077886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769423	2538762	2540105	275345	276642	SPCC306.04c	SPBC106.04	set1	ada1	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.494885333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769424	2538762	2543617	275345	280031	SPCC306.04c	SPAC4A8.10	set1	SPAC4A8.10	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.434146952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769425	2538762	2540885	275345	277402	SPCC306.04c	SPBC660.14	set1	mik1	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390314134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769426	2538762	2542518	275345	278976	SPCC306.04c	SPAC1B3.16c	set1	vht1	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.261595734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769427	2538762	2543637	275345	280051	SPCC306.04c	SPAC3H8.02	set1	csr102	kmt2	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.705760534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769428	2538762	2540235	275345	276767	SPCC306.04c	SPBC336.13c	set1	SPBC336.13c	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569449612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769429	2538762	2541426	275345	277931	SPCC306.04c	SPAC227.06	set1	SPAC227.06	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.26927891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769430	2538762	2542812	275345	279259	SPCC306.04c	SPAC6F6.01	set1	cch1	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.824509586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769431	2538762	2543064	275345	279497	SPCC306.04c	SPAC3G6.01	set1	hrp3	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.203518513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769432	2538762	2539156	275345	275728	SPCC306.04c	SPCC1450.08c	set1	wtf16	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.317645968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769433	2538762	2542293	275345	278761	SPCC306.04c	SPAC17G8.14c	set1	pck1	kmt2	SPAC22H10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.76008277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769434	2538762	2542378	275345	278842	SPCC306.04c	SPAC1805.04	set1	nup132	kmt2	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.537098067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769435	2538762	2540995	275345	277511	SPCC306.04c	SPBC337.16	set1	cho1	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041265861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769436	2538762	2543339	275345	279762	SPCC306.04c	SPAC630.13c	set1	tsc2	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.391292842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769437	2538762	2538896	275345	275474	SPCC306.04c	SPCC584.11c	set1	SPCC584.11c	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.565802238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769438	2538762	2539930	275345	276474	SPCC306.04c	SPBC1198.11c	set1	reb1	kmt2	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.095594651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769439	2538762	2540068	275345	276606	SPCC306.04c	SPBC1734.12c	set1	alg12	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.314655805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769440	2538762	2542747	275345	279197	SPCC306.04c	SPAC15A10.06	set1	SPAC15A10.06	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.82441017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769441	2538762	2541681	275345	278177	SPCC306.04c	SPAC14C4.01c	set1	SPAC14C4.01c	kmt2	SPAC19D5.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.502662801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769442	2538762	2541733	275345	278227	SPCC306.04c	SPAC27F1.03c	set1	uch1	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.800733015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769443	2538762	2540139	275345	276676	SPCC306.04c	SPBC1773.06c	set1	adh8	kmt2	SPBC1773.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982026307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769444	2538762	2542614	275345	279068	SPCC306.04c	SPAC1399.04c	set1	SPAC1399.04c	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.456790611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769445	2538762	2540686	275345	277211	SPCC306.04c	SPBC21D10.10	set1	bdc1	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.18617331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769446	2538762	2541082	275345	277597	SPCC306.04c	SPBC577.11	set1	SPBC577.11	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57417163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769447	2538762	2540455	275345	276983	SPCC306.04c	SPBC215.05	set1	gpd1	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.624561576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769448	2538762	2540664	275345	277189	SPCC306.04c	SPBC215.02	set1	bob1	kmt2	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820920358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769449	2538762	2538806	275345	275387	SPCC306.04c	SPCC1840.09	set1	SPCC1840.09	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.261840459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769450	2538762	3361436	275345	280512	SPCC306.04c	SPAC1296.01c	set1	SPAC1296.01c	kmt2	SPAC22F3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.929751296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769451	2538762	2543098	275345	279530	SPCC306.04c	SPAC4A8.06c	set1	SPAC4A8.06c	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991695645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769452	2538762	2540999	275345	277515	SPCC306.04c	SPBC4B4.04	set1	SPBC4B4.04	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.049549134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769453	2538762	2541200	275345	277714	SPCC306.04c	SPBC8D2.03c	set1	hhf2	kmt2	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713889742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769454	2538762	2542468	275345	278929	SPCC306.04c	SPAC1D4.09c	set1	rtf2	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.655147968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769455	2538762	2542107	275345	278583	SPCC306.04c	SPAC30.01c	set1	sec72	kmt2	sec7b|sec702	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.863090501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769456	2538762	2541951	275345	278438	SPCC306.04c	SPAC222.05c	set1	mss1	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87251104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769457	2538762	2541208	275345	277722	SPCC306.04c	SPBC887.04c	set1	lub1	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.910361781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769458	2538762	2542677	275345	279130	SPCC306.04c	SPAC26F1.10c	set1	pyp1	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.801664805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769459	2538762	2541012	275345	277527	SPCC306.04c	SPBC3H7.12	set1	rav2	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.269452388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769460	2538762	2538775	275345	275357	SPCC306.04c	SPCC23B6.05c	set1	ssb3	kmt2	rpa3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.720387373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769461	2538762	2538801	275345	275382	SPCC306.04c	SPCC285.13c	set1	nup60	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.763482657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769462	2538762	2541026	275345	277541	SPCC306.04c	SPBC337.09	set1	erg28	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.619609195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769463	2538762	2542555	275345	279012	SPCC306.04c	SPAC1952.06c	set1	SPAC1952.06c	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.934867754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769464	2538762	2540220	275345	276753	SPCC306.04c	SPBC337.03	set1	rhn1	kmt2	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.872568034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769465	2538762	2539797	275345	276347	SPCC306.04c	SPBC16G5.14c	set1	rps3	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.807123028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769466	2538762	2540929	275345	277445	SPCC306.04c	SPBC354.03	set1	swd3	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.923297081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769467	2538762	2540463	275345	276991	SPCC306.04c	SPBC2F12.15c	set1	pfa3	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.252058706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769468	2538762	2540425	275345	276953	SPCC306.04c	SPBC27.06c	set1	mgr2	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.75156749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769469	2538762	2542318	275345	278784	SPCC306.04c	SPAC16C9.05	set1	cph1	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.151035383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769470	2538762	2542023	275345	278506	SPCC306.04c	SPAC20H4.10	set1	ufd2	kmt2	SPAC145.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.315389152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769471	2538762	2541527	275345	278027	SPCC306.04c	SPAC31A2.09c	set1	apm4	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.102625683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769472	2538762	2542969	275345	279409	SPCC306.04c	SPAC4G8.10	set1	gos1	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77484652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769473	2538762	2541960	275345	278447	SPCC306.04c	SPAC6G9.15c	set1	SPAC6G9.15c	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773609093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769474	2538762	2540663	275345	277188	SPCC306.04c	SPBC56F2.06	set1	mug147	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.859246544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769475	2538762	2540344	275345	276873	SPCC306.04c	SPBC30D10.03c	set1	SPBC30D10.03c	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.916508326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769476	2538762	2541923	275345	278411	SPCC306.04c	SPAC23C4.09c	set1	SPAC23C4.09c	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446159406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769477	2538762	2543551	275345	279968	SPCC306.04c	SPAC4G8.06c	set1	trm12	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.904440004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769478	2538762	2543563	275345	279979	SPCC306.04c	SPAC664.02c	set1	arp8	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.532559603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769479	2538762	2541522	275345	278023	SPCC306.04c	SPAC23E2.01	set1	fep1	kmt2	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.786798108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769480	2538762	2541416	275345	277923	SPCC306.04c	SPBCPT2R1.01c	set1	SPBCPT2R1.01c	kmt2	SPBPB2B2.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704847792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769481	2538762	2539352	275345	275918	SPCC306.04c	SPCC188.07	set1	ccq1	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.435033712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769482	2538762	2540883	275345	277400	SPCC306.04c	SPBC577.06c	set1	stt4	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.450017192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769483	2538762	2541489	275345	277991	SPCC306.04c	SPAC23D3.11	set1	ayr1	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807887479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769484	2538762	2538906	275345	275483	SPCC306.04c	SPCC1259.03	set1	rpa12	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.58706921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769485	2538762	2539092	275345	275664	SPCC306.04c	SPCC1259.08	set1	SPCC1259.08	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928142148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769486	2538762	2542845	275345	279291	SPCC306.04c	SPAC824.04	set1	SPAC824.04	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.379894357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769487	2538762	2541021	275345	277536	SPCC306.04c	SPBC3B8.10c	set1	nem1	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.939604579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769488	2538762	2540964	275345	277480	SPCC306.04c	SPBC365.16	set1	SPBC365.16	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877193337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769489	2538762	2542665	275345	279118	SPCC306.04c	SPAC10F6.08c	set1	nht10	kmt2	nht1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.046299136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769490	2538762	2542568	275345	279024	SPCC306.04c	SPAC1952.02	set1	tma23	kmt2	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.940983798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769491	2538762	2539467	275345	276030	SPCC306.04c	SPCC417.07c	set1	mto1	kmt2	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.269732834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769492	2538762	2543537	275345	279954	SPCC306.04c	SPAC4D7.05	set1	sum1	kmt2	tif34	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922833346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769493	2538762	2542177	275345	278652	SPCC306.04c	SPAC17H9.08	set1	SPAC17H9.08	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.334972863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769494	2538762	2541801	275345	278292	SPCC306.04c	SPAC2F7.08c	set1	snf5	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.305817436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769495	2538762	2541250	275345	277764	SPCC306.04c	SPBC8D2.17	set1	gmh4	kmt2	SPBC8D2.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.98052843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769496	2538762	2543375	275345	279797	SPCC306.04c	SPAC3H1.08c	set1	SPAC3H1.08c	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.003600637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769497	2538762	2542646	275345	279100	SPCC306.04c	SPAC11H11.05c	set1	fta6	kmt2	sma6	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.989101773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769498	2538762	2541776	275345	278270	SPCC306.04c	SPAC23H3.05c	set1	swd1	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.33562508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769499	2538762	2538770	275345	275353	SPCC306.04c	SPCC1753.02c	set1	git3	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035396862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769500	2538762	2540647	275345	277172	SPCC306.04c	SPBC18H10.07	set1	SPBC18H10.07	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.132537749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769501	2538762	2541160	275345	277675	SPCC306.04c	SPBC725.09c	set1	hob3	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851444628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769502	2538762	2540429	275345	276957	SPCC306.04c	SPBC29A10.07	set1	pom152	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.76074289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769503	2538762	2542544	275345	279001	SPCC306.04c	SPAC18G6.10	set1	lem2	kmt2	heh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.188021361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769504	2538762	2543412	275345	279834	SPCC306.04c	SPAC637.07	set1	moe1	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.771199369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769505	2538762	2539733	275345	276285	SPCC306.04c	SPBC16E9.12c	set1	pab2	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.803904002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769506	2538762	2540396	275345	276924	SPCC306.04c	SPBC31F10.12	set1	tma20	kmt2	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511038709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769507	2538762	2540673	275345	277198	SPCC306.04c	SPBC1D7.03	set1	mug80	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.026591202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769508	2538762	2539898	275345	276444	SPCC306.04c	SPBC12D12.07c	set1	trx2	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152506217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769509	2538762	2541889	275345	278379	SPCC306.04c	SPAC2F7.03c	set1	pom1	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.092582687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769510	2538762	2540886	275345	277403	SPCC306.04c	SPBC4F6.10	set1	vps901	kmt2	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783016761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769511	2538762	2542989	275345	279427	SPCC306.04c	SPAC11E3.13c	set1	gas5	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781711343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769512	2538762	2542817	275345	279264	SPCC306.04c	SPAC13G6.02c	set1	rps101	kmt2	rps1-1|rps3a-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092899684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769513	2538762	2541876	275345	278366	SPCC306.04c	SPAP27G11.11c	set1	SPAP27G11.11c	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.860176149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769514	2538762	2543283	275345	279709	SPCC306.04c	SPAC6C3.04	set1	cit1	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866944331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769515	2538762	2539903	275345	276449	SPCC306.04c	SPBC15C4.04c	set1	SPBC15C4.04c	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.846728981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769516	2538762	2539999	275345	276543	SPCC306.04c	SPBC1734.15	set1	rsc4	kmt2	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.02411634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769517	2538762	2541496	275345	277998	SPCC306.04c	SPAC23D3.09	set1	arp42	kmt2	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.538685374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769518	2538762	2542522	275345	278980	SPCC306.04c	SPAC19A8.03	set1	ymr1	kmt2	SPAC19A8.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.785653638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769519	2538762	2540497	275345	277025	SPCC306.04c	SPBC27.04	set1	uds1	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.114880201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769520	2538762	2541166	275345	277681	SPCC306.04c	SPBC725.15	set1	ura5	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.78214012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769521	2538762	2543363	275345	279785	SPCC306.04c	SPAPB24D3.09c	set1	pdr1	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094455114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769522	2538762	2542877	275345	279322	SPCC306.04c	SPAC13G6.15c	set1	SPAC13G6.15c	kmt2	SPAC24B11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.70135649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769523	2538762	2543245	275345	279673	SPCC306.04c	SPAC56F8.06c	set1	alg10	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44621448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769524	2538762	2539857	275345	276404	SPCC306.04c	SPBC1604.20c	set1	tea2	kmt2	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.859844012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769525	2538762	2540801	275345	277320	SPCC306.04c	SPBC18H10.10c	set1	saf4	kmt2	cwc16|cwf16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.211978535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769526	2538762	2542902	275345	279346	SPCC306.04c	SPAC144.05	set1	SPAC144.05	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.836627308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769527	2538762	2543250	275345	279678	SPCC306.04c	SPAC3G9.15c	set1	fcf2	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.874924711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769528	2538762	2539111	275345	275683	SPCC306.04c	SPCC417.11c	set1	SPCC417.11c	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865256382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769529	2538762	2541710	275345	278205	SPCC306.04c	SPAC343.11c	set1	msc1	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.751882311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769530	2538762	2540538	275345	277065	SPCC306.04c	SPBC26H8.03	set1	cho2	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.520968908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769531	2538762	2541351	275345	277862	SPCC306.04c	SPBP4H10.14c	set1	SPBP4H10.14c	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987777405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769532	2538762	2543406	275345	279828	SPCC306.04c	SPAC9.12c	set1	atp12	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.60636054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769533	2538762	2539667	275345	276222	SPCC306.04c	SPBC13G1.08c	set1	ash2	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.726028472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769534	2538762	2542126	275345	278602	SPCC306.04c	SPAC1B3.05	set1	not3	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.569233894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769535	2538762	2539000	275345	275574	SPCC306.04c	SPCC1450.06c	set1	grx3	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.799745579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769536	2538762	2542528	275345	278986	SPCC306.04c	SPAC1B3.08	set1	SPAC1B3.08	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.047925155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769537	2538762	2540628	275345	277154	SPCC306.04c	SPBC25B2.08	set1	SPBC25B2.08	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.45940653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769538	2538762	2538837	275345	275418	SPCC306.04c	SPCC4B3.03c	set1	SPCC4B3.03c	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.559032271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769539	2538762	2538818	275345	275399	SPCC306.04c	SPCC645.12c	set1	SPCC645.12c	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.308224058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769540	2538762	2539850	275345	276398	SPCC306.04c	SPBC15D4.07c	set1	atg9	kmt2	apg9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.717827899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769541	2538762	2539974	275345	276518	SPCC306.04c	SPBC32H8.07	set1	git5	kmt2	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.256271413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769542	2538762	2541542	275345	278042	SPCC306.04c	SPAC4G9.02	set1	rnh201	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.888236779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769543	2538762	2540077	275345	276615	SPCC306.04c	SPBC17D11.04c	set1	nto1	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.657926145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769544	2538762	2541882	275345	278372	SPCC306.04c	SPAC2F7.09c	set1	SPAC2F7.09c	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98736009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769545	2538762	2543378	275345	279800	SPCC306.04c	SPAC3H8.07c	set1	pac10	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.877971901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769546	2538762	2539958	275345	276502	SPCC306.04c	SPBC1718.07c	set1	zfs1	kmt2	moc4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152150633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769547	2538762	2542254	275345	278724	SPCC306.04c	SPAC30D11.04c	set1	nup124	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.026863522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769548	2538762	2541900	275345	278390	SPCC306.04c	SPAC23H4.17c	set1	srb10	kmt2	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.695151133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769549	2538762	2542519	275345	278977	SPCC306.04c	SPAC19G12.08	set1	scs7	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.594216095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769550	2538762	2539119	275345	275691	SPCC306.04c	SPCC1223.13	set1	cbf12	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046051382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769551	2538762	2542439	275345	278901	SPCC306.04c	SPAC17A5.08	set1	erp2	kmt2	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.80947937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769552	2538762	2543443	275345	279863	SPCC306.04c	SPAC3H1.12c	set1	snt2	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.386323579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769553	2538762	2543561	275345	279977	SPCC306.04c	SPAC922.04	set1	SPAC922.04	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32285012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769554	2538762	2539740	275345	276292	SPCC306.04c	SPBC1685.04	set1	SPBC1685.04	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.850855532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769555	2538762	2542125	275345	278601	SPCC306.04c	SPAP8A3.03	set1	SPAP8A3.03	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.050058965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769556	2538762	2542008	275345	278491	SPCC306.04c	SPAC2G11.07c	set1	ptc3	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.172261352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769557	2538762	2541142	275345	277657	SPCC306.04c	SPBC725.04	set1	SPBC725.04	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039545616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769558	2538762	2541536	275345	278036	SPCC306.04c	SPAC1071.02	set1	mms19	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.608596132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769559	2538762	2540201	275345	276734	SPCC306.04c	SPBC13A2.04c	set1	ptr2	kmt2	SPBC13A2.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.82126874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769560	2538762	2541708	275345	278203	SPCC306.04c	SPAC31A2.02	set1	trm112	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983520639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769561	2538762	2541464	275345	277966	SPCC306.04c	SPAC222.08c	set1	SPAC222.08c	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.354585017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769562	2538762	2541053	275345	277568	SPCC306.04c	SPBC56F2.10c	set1	alg5	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.950500626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769563	2538762	2540967	275345	277483	SPCC306.04c	SPBC36B7.08c	set1	SPBC36B7.08c	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.035824768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769564	2538762	2540184	275345	276717	SPCC306.04c	SPBC106.12c	set1	SPBC106.12c	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.68192304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769565	2538762	2543390	275345	279812	SPCC306.04c	SPAC631.01c	set1	acp2	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.155493956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769566	2538762	2543331	275345	279754	SPCC306.04c	SPAC56E4.07	set1	SPAC56E4.07	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809500217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769567	2538762	2540533	275345	277061	SPCC306.04c	SPBC29A10.16c	set1	SPBC29A10.16c	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.828109466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769568	2538762	2539711	275345	276264	SPCC306.04c	SPBC1683.09c	set1	frp1	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098734203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769569	2538762	2540229	275345	276761	SPCC306.04c	SPBC31F10.15c	set1	atp15	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.517896519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769570	2538762	2540357	275345	276886	SPCC306.04c	SPBC2F12.05c	set1	SPBC2F12.05c	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.286219719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769571	2538762	3361105	275345	280181	SPCC306.04c	SPCC188.10c	set1	SPCC188.10c	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154676081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769572	2538762	2541488	275345	277990	SPCC306.04c	SPAC227.17c	set1	SPAC227.17c	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.883762464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769573	2538762	2543477	275345	279897	SPCC306.04c	SPAPB2B4.04c	set1	SPAPB2B4.04c	kmt2	pmc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.186428068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769574	2538762	2540005	275345	276549	SPCC306.04c	SPBC1347.09	set1	SPBC1347.09	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981691364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769575	2538762	2541337	275345	277848	SPCC306.04c	SPBP35G2.13c	set1	swc2	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.441736426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769576	2538762	2543139	275345	279571	SPCC306.04c	SPAC12G12.03	set1	cip2	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322059855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769577	2538762	2540703	275345	277227	SPCC306.04c	SPBC20F10.07	set1	SPBC20F10.07	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.259382237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769578	2538762	2541793	275345	278284	SPCC306.04c	SPAC22H10.02	set1	SPAC22H10.02	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.191533159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769579	2538762	2542869	275345	279314	SPCC306.04c	SPAC140.02	set1	gar2	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517329644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769580	2538762	2541713	275345	278208	SPCC306.04c	SPAC3A12.12	set1	atp11	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.232956615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769581	2538762	2540821	275345	277339	SPCC306.04c	SPBC800.03	set1	clr3	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.565646739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769582	2538762	2542170	275345	278645	SPCC306.04c	SPAC17G8.13c	set1	mst2	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.060158141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769583	2538762	2539706	275345	276259	SPCC306.04c	SPBC16G5.13	set1	ptf2	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.905829434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769584	2538762	2542806	275345	279254	SPCC306.04c	SPAC1610.01	set1	saf5	kmt2	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.900007068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769585	2538762	2540706	275345	277229	SPCC306.04c	SPBC19C7.12c	set1	omh1	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.399076977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769586	2538762	2539160	275345	275732	SPCC306.04c	SPCC18.17c	set1	SPCC18.17c	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.205878096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769587	2538762	3361389	275345	280465	SPCC306.04c	SPAC977.13c	set1	SPAC977.13c	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035056235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769588	2538762	2542759	275345	279209	SPCC306.04c	SPAC9G1.07	set1	SPAC9G1.07	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.70161158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769589	2538762	2539555	275345	276116	SPCC306.04c	SPCC4B3.08	set1	lsg1	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.849509544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769590	2538762	2542767	275345	279217	SPCC306.04c	SPAC1565.07c	set1	knd1	kmt2	SPAC1565.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.356018967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769591	2538762	2543071	275345	279504	SPCC306.04c	SPAC3C7.06c	set1	pit1	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.692639638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769592	2538762	2541175	275345	277689	SPCC306.04c	SPBC839.13c	set1	rpl1601	kmt2	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.239223496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769593	2538762	2540061	275345	276599	SPCC306.04c	SPBC119.12	set1	rud3	kmt2	SPBC119.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.119948472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769594	2538762	2541909	275345	278399	SPCC306.04c	SPAC227.01c	set1	erd1	kmt2	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713577142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769595	2538762	2540498	275345	277026	SPCC306.04c	SPBC27.02c	set1	ask1	kmt2	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.369030163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769596	2538762	2542883	275345	279328	SPCC306.04c	SPAC1486.04c	set1	alm1	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.560591821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769597	2538762	2541121	275345	277636	SPCC306.04c	SPBC609.03	set1	iqw1	kmt2	iqwd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.355690039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769598	2538762	2539925	275345	276469	SPCC306.04c	SPBC16H5.13	set1	SPBC16H5.13	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.762913517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769599	2538762	2539600	275345	276158	SPCC306.04c	SPCP1E11.03	set1	mug170	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.181718884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769600	2538762	2539030	275345	275603	SPCC306.04c	SPCP1E11.02	set1	ppk38	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87556293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769601	2538762	2542940	275345	279381	SPCC306.04c	SPAC31A2.12	set1	SPAC31A2.12	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.373133449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769602	2538762	2540733	275345	277256	SPCC306.04c	SPBC4.01	set1	dni2	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44538872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769603	2538762	2539614	275345	276172	SPCC306.04c	SPBC17D11.08	set1	SPBC17D11.08	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.055756136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769604	2538762	2541100	275345	277615	SPCC306.04c	SPBC651.04	set1	SPBC651.04	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.199019672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769605	2538762	2541432	275345	277937	SPCC306.04c	SPAC1F5.05c	set1	mso1	kmt2	SPAC1F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.107423348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769606	2538762	2543192	275345	279621	SPCC306.04c	SPAC343.18	set1	rfp2	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.211815014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769607	2538762	2538756	275345	275339	SPCC306.04c	SPCC1795.10c	set1	SPCC1795.10c	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.723138621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769608	2538762	2541531	275345	278031	SPCC306.04c	SPAC25A8.01c	set1	fft3	kmt2	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.60915651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769609	2538762	2540346	275345	276875	SPCC306.04c	SPBC2F12.03c	set1	ebs1	kmt2	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.996450347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769610	2538762	2540000	275345	276544	SPCC306.04c	SPBC1683.13c	set1	cha4	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.921272763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769611	2538762	2542418	275345	278881	SPCC306.04c	SPAC1805.07c	set1	dad2	kmt2	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.171865298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769612	2538762	2539188	275345	275759	SPCC306.04c	SPCC1827.04	set1	vms1	kmt2	SPCC1827.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.998304311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769613	2538762	2542826	275345	279273	SPCC306.04c	SPAC13G6.09	set1	SPAC13G6.09	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.052726254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769614	2538762	2539668	275345	276223	SPCC306.04c	SPBC11B10.10c	set1	pht1	kmt2	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.058086533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769615	2538762	2539182	275345	275753	SPCC306.04c	SPCC16A11.16c	set1	rpn1302	kmt2	rpn13|rpn13b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.403826287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769616	2538762	2543602	275345	280017	SPCC306.04c	SPAPB1A11.04c	set1	mca1	kmt2	SPAPB1A11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.769124187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769617	2538762	2540516	275345	277044	SPCC306.04c	SPBC21C3.01c	set1	vps13a	kmt2	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.694667035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769618	2538762	2539928	275345	276472	SPCC306.04c	SPBC1604.08c	set1	imp1	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.38383008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769619	2538762	2542786	275345	279235	SPCC306.04c	SPAC15A10.07	set1	SPAC15A10.07	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986856654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769620	2538762	2543044	275345	279479	SPCC306.04c	SPAC3C7.12	set1	tip1	kmt2	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.911384645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769621	2538762	2542386	275345	278850	SPCC306.04c	SPAC1805.01c	set1	ppk6	kmt2	SPAPJ736.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.740574478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769622	2538762	2539920	275345	276464	SPCC306.04c	SPBC119.08	set1	pmk1	kmt2	spm1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.772020758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769623	2538762	2540551	275345	277078	SPCC306.04c	SPBC23E6.01c	set1	cxr1	kmt2	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.333495115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769624	2538762	2543337	275345	279760	SPCC306.04c	SPAC959.08	set1	rpl2102	kmt2	rpl21|rpl21-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868249296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769625	2538762	2539253	275345	275823	SPCC306.04c	SPCC1827.03c	set1	SPCC1827.03c	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.710408014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769626	2538762	2541151	275345	277666	SPCC306.04c	SPBC713.03	set1	SPBC713.03	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.337865831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769627	2538762	2542630	275345	279084	SPCC306.04c	SPAC2C4.06c	set1	SPAC2C4.06c	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.034643918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769628	2538762	2539700	275345	276253	SPCC306.04c	SPBC1685.15c	set1	klp6	kmt2	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.825778411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769629	2538762	2543384	275345	279806	SPCC306.04c	SPAC637.06	set1	gmh5	kmt2	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.90641998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769630	2538762	2541806	275345	278297	SPCC306.04c	SPAC4G8.13c	set1	prz1	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.759903892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769631	2538762	2539767	275345	276318	SPCC306.04c	SPBC1703.06	set1	pof10	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.581527233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769632	2538762	2543684	275345	280098	SPCC306.04c	SPAC4G8.03c	set1	SPAC4G8.03c	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.416190597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769633	2538762	2538854	275345	275435	SPCC306.04c	SPCP1E11.05c	set1	are2	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.922084955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769634	2538762	2543087	275345	279520	SPCC306.04c	SPAC30C2.04	set1	SPAC30C2.04	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.354310778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769635	2538762	2543076	275345	279509	SPCC306.04c	SPAC30C2.07	set1	SPAC30C2.07	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.104761692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769636	2538762	2543070	275345	279503	SPCC306.04c	SPAC2H10.02c	set1	SPAC2H10.02c	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.610662808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769637	2538762	2541867	275345	278357	SPCC306.04c	SPAC22E12.14c	set1	sck2	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.460789054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769638	2538762	2540167	275345	276702	SPCC306.04c	SPBC1683.04	set1	SPBC1683.04	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.461494192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769639	2538762	2543333	275345	279756	SPCC306.04c	SPAC694.02	set1	SPAC694.02	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.343668439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769640	2538762	2538834	275345	275415	SPCC306.04c	SPCC126.08c	set1	SPCC126.08c	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.332507989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769641	2538762	2543448	275345	279868	SPCC306.04c	SPAC3H5.07	set1	rpl702	kmt2	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.564910536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769642	2538762	2540383	275345	276912	SPCC306.04c	SPBC31E1.02c	set1	pmr1	kmt2	cps5|pgak2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.400046969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769643	2538762	2542314	275345	278780	SPCC306.04c	SPAC16E8.06c	set1	nop12	kmt2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147311687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769644	2538762	2541062	275345	277577	SPCC306.04c	SPBC660.11	set1	tcg1	kmt2	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.148660511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769645	2538762	2543463	275345	279883	SPCC306.04c	SPAPB21F2.03	set1	slx9	kmt2	SPAPB21F2.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.861095792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769646	2538762	2543616	275345	280030	SPCC306.04c	SPAC4A8.09c	set1	cwf21	kmt2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.31244226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769647	2542288	2542207	278756	278682	SPAC17G6.02c	SPAC17H9.10c	tco1	ddb1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.821863146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769648	2542288	2540161	278756	276696	SPAC17G6.02c	SPBC13E7.03c	tco1	SPBC13E7.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935810511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769649	2542288	2542981	278756	279419	SPAC17G6.02c	SPAC824.02	tco1	bst1	-	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449993687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769650	2542288	2540229	278756	276761	SPAC17G6.02c	SPBC31F10.15c	tco1	atp15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.261033619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769651	2542288	3361520	278756	280596	SPAC17G6.02c	SPAC1610.02c	tco1	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.198371566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769652	2542288	2542725	278756	279176	SPAC17G6.02c	SPAC3A12.10	tco1	rpl2001	-	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.457312187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769653	2542288	2539763	278756	276314	SPAC17G6.02c	SPBC1861.05	tco1	SPBC1861.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147728154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769654	2542288	2541675	278756	278171	SPAC17G6.02c	SPAC22F8.12c	tco1	shf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.074354461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769655	2539869	2541801	276415	278292	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC2F7.08c	cdc2	snf5	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.838935152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769656	2539869	2539293	276415	275861	SPBC11B10.09	SPCC553.08c	cdc2	ria1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	SPCC553.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.997517353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769657	2541370	2542895	277881	279339	SPBP8B7.07c	SPAC13G6.10c	set6	asl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.412010135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769658	2541370	2540060	277881	276598	SPBP8B7.07c	SPBC106.01	set6	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.653467068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769659	2541370	2543064	277881	279497	SPBP8B7.07c	SPAC3G6.01	set6	hrp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.033234116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769660	2541370	2542787	277881	279236	SPBP8B7.07c	SPAC9G1.08c	set6	SPAC9G1.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.878939683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769661	2541370	2542071	277881	278548	SPBP8B7.07c	SPAC26H5.03	set6	pcf2	-	cac2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.507652484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769662	2541370	2540425	277881	276953	SPBP8B7.07c	SPBC27.06c	set6	mgr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090570547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769663	2541370	2542177	277881	278652	SPBP8B7.07c	SPAC17H9.08	set6	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036924649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769664	2541370	2541250	277881	277764	SPBP8B7.07c	SPBC8D2.17	set6	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445116177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769665	2541370	2542469	277881	278930	SPBP8B7.07c	SPAC19A8.04	set6	erg5	-	cyp61	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991105678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769666	2541370	2541955	277881	278442	SPBP8B7.07c	SPAC5D6.04	set6	SPAC5D6.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154068863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769667	2541370	2542919	277881	279360	SPBP8B7.07c	SPAC6C3.08	set6	nas6	-	SPAC6C3.08	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809909616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769668	2541370	2541464	277881	277966	SPBP8B7.07c	SPAC222.08c	set6	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330835378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769669	2541370	2541175	277881	277689	SPBP8B7.07c	SPBC839.13c	set6	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.209830227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769670	2541370	2543567	277881	279983	SPBP8B7.07c	SPAC890.03	set6	ppk16	-	mug92	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.158434398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769671	2541370	2540555	277881	277082	SPBP8B7.07c	SPBP16F5.02	set6	mcs2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.305639096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769672	2541370	2540936	277881	277452	SPBP8B7.07c	SPBC800.05c	set6	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874936981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769673	2541370	2541806	277881	278297	SPBP8B7.07c	SPAC4G8.13c	set6	prz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.081892887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769674	2543159	2540060	279590	276598	SPAC3C7.09	SPBC106.01	set8	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04584469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769675	2543159	2543529	279590	279947	SPAC3C7.09	SPAC4C5.02c	set8	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.51311011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769676	2543159	2540229	279590	276761	SPAC3C7.09	SPBC31F10.15c	set8	atp15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.20592378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769677	2543159	2540309	279590	276839	SPAC3C7.09	SPBC21B10.13c	set8	yox1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875436243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769678	2542788	2539050	279237	275623	SPAC15A10.15	SPCC11E10.08	sgo2	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.70011918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769679	2542788	2542577	279237	279033	SPAC15A10.15	SPAC19G12.15c	sgo2	tpp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983954533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769680	2542788	2542378	279237	278842	SPAC15A10.15	SPAC1805.04	sgo2	nup132	-	Nup133b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874395424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769681	2542788	2541633	279237	278129	SPAC15A10.15	SPAC664.01c	sgo2	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.472809194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769682	2542788	2539420	279237	275985	SPAC15A10.15	SPCC970.07c	sgo2	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.990250872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769683	2542788	2540825	279237	277343	SPAC15A10.15	SPBC428.08c	sgo2	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.127398667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769684	2542788	2542177	279237	278652	SPAC15A10.15	SPAC17H9.08	sgo2	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.272288136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769685	2542788	2540990	279237	277506	SPAC15A10.15	SPBC36B7.06c	sgo2	mug20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093548263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769686	2542788	2541959	279237	278446	SPAC15A10.15	SPAC23C4.03	sgo2	hrk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.631205925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769687	2542788	2539527	279237	276089	SPAC15A10.15	SPCC338.16	sgo2	pof3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810324681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769688	2542788	2538848	279237	275429	SPAC15A10.15	SPCC613.12c	sgo2	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.408919547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769689	2542788	2541628	279237	278124	SPAC15A10.15	SPAC110.02	sgo2	pds5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844620459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769690	2540306	2539034	276836	275607	SPBC2G5.02c	SPCC830.10	ckb2	ham1	SPBC2G5.02c	SPCC830.10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.554114542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769691	2540306	2542895	276836	279339	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC13G6.10c	ckb2	asl1	SPBC2G5.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383303595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769692	2540306	2541763	276836	278257	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC22F3.11c	ckb2	snu23	SPBC2G5.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145571459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769693	2540306	2542598	276836	279052	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC6G10.08	ckb2	idp1	SPBC2G5.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.411116377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769694	2540306	2541512	276836	278013	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC11E3.08c	ckb2	nse6	SPBC2G5.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.21151953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769695	2540306	2542293	276836	278761	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC17G8.14c	ckb2	pck1	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC22H10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.893976279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769696	2540306	2542237	276836	278709	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC19E9.02	ckb2	fin1	SPBC2G5.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.077158702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769697	2540306	2538929	276836	275505	SPBC2G5.02c	SPCC162.02c	ckb2	SPCC162.02c	SPBC2G5.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512647519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769698	2540306	2543559	276836	279975	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC664.04c	ckb2	rps1602	SPBC2G5.02c	rps16|rps16-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.640993167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769699	2540306	2542050	276836	278529	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC212.02	ckb2	SPAC212.02	SPBC2G5.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.880275805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769700	2540306	2542273	276836	278742	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC17H9.13c	ckb2	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC2G5.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.170869244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769701	2540306	2539935	276836	276479	SPBC2G5.02c	SPBC13G1.04c	ckb2	abh1	SPBC2G5.02c	SPBC13G1.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452231128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769702	2540306	2541026	276836	277541	SPBC2G5.02c	SPBC337.09	ckb2	erg28	SPBC2G5.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.272964967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769703	2540306	2539937	276836	276481	SPBC2G5.02c	SPBC1539.08	ckb2	arf6	SPBC2G5.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.218505861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769704	2540306	2541761	276836	278255	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC7D4.12c	ckb2	SPAC7D4.12c	SPBC2G5.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.229542725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769705	2540306	2541346	276836	277857	SPBC2G5.02c	SPBP8B7.08c	ckb2	ppm1	SPBC2G5.02c	SPBP8B7.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.722787508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769706	2540306	2540825	276836	277343	SPBC2G5.02c	SPBC428.08c	ckb2	clr4	SPBC2G5.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.163454483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769707	2540306	2541021	276836	277536	SPBC2G5.02c	SPBC3B8.10c	ckb2	nem1	SPBC2G5.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322870853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769708	2540306	2542311	276836	278777	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC16A10.05c	ckb2	dad1	SPBC2G5.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.15920839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769709	2540306	2543020	276836	279456	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC10F6.13c	ckb2	SPAC10F6.13c	SPBC2G5.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.058811615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769710	2540306	2541160	276836	277675	SPBC2G5.02c	SPBC725.09c	ckb2	hob3	SPBC2G5.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.725817879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769711	2540306	2541824	276836	278315	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC27E2.02	ckb2	SPAC27E2.02	SPBC2G5.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.38267534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769712	2540306	2539667	276836	276222	SPBC2G5.02c	SPBC13G1.08c	ckb2	ash2	SPBC2G5.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.673739912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769713	2540306	2538982	276836	275556	SPBC2G5.02c	SPCC1450.12	ckb2	SPCC1450.12	SPBC2G5.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578910375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769714	2540306	2541900	276836	278390	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC23H4.17c	ckb2	srb10	SPBC2G5.02c	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707211934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769715	2540306	2542549	276836	279006	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC19A8.11c	ckb2	SPAC19A8.11c	SPBC2G5.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.07893529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769716	2540306	2540530	276836	277058	SPBC2G5.02c	SPBC405.05	ckb2	atg16	SPBC2G5.02c	SPBC405.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442280768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769717	2540306	2542439	276836	278901	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC17A5.08	ckb2	erp2	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.198352676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769718	2540306	2541464	276836	277966	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC222.08c	ckb2	SPAC222.08c	SPBC2G5.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.055624869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769719	2540306	2540180	276836	276713	SPBC2G5.02c	SPBC16D10.11c	ckb2	rps1801	SPBC2G5.02c	rps18-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.777553284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769720	2540306	2541266	276836	277780	SPBC2G5.02c	SPBP16F5.05c	ckb2	yar1	SPBC2G5.02c	SPBP16F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323103633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769721	2540306	2543049	276836	279484	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC1296.04	ckb2	mug65	SPBC2G5.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.567658623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769722	2540306	2539812	276836	276362	SPBC2G5.02c	SPBC1347.02	ckb2	fkbp39	SPBC2G5.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.050956033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769723	2540306	2538848	276836	275429	SPBC2G5.02c	SPCC613.12c	ckb2	raf1	SPBC2G5.02c	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.157201553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769724	2540306	2543051	276836	279486	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC1071.08	ckb2	rpp203	SPBC2G5.02c	rla6|rpp2-3|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.450136093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769725	2540306	2541909	276836	278399	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC227.01c	ckb2	erd1	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.823081184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769726	2540306	2541531	276836	278031	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC25A8.01c	ckb2	fft3	SPBC2G5.02c	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.616567326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769727	2540306	2541229	276836	277743	SPBC2G5.02c	SPBC839.05c	ckb2	rps1701	SPBC2G5.02c	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.25414668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769728	2540306	2539729	276836	276281	SPBC2G5.02c	SPBC11B10.07c	ckb2	ivn1	SPBC2G5.02c	pi004|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980484941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769729	2540306	2540516	276836	277044	SPBC2G5.02c	SPBC21C3.01c	ckb2	vps13a	SPBC2G5.02c	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.616015589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769730	2540306	2539205	276836	275775	SPBC2G5.02c	SPCC4B3.15	ckb2	mid1	SPBC2G5.02c	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.658104912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769731	2540306	2540146	276836	276683	SPBC2G5.02c	SPBC17A3.06	ckb2	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC2G5.02c	pi040	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.59182309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769732	2540306	2539189	276836	275760	SPBC2G5.02c	SPCC1682.16	ckb2	rpt4	SPBC2G5.02c	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383195176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769733	2540306	2539178	276836	275749	SPBC2G5.02c	SPCC1682.14	ckb2	rpl1902	SPBC2G5.02c	rpl19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.748312851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769734	2540306	2543337	276836	279760	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC959.08	ckb2	rpl2102	SPBC2G5.02c	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320395223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769735	2540306	2542716	276836	279169	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC25H1.07	ckb2	emc1	SPBC2G5.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.412948509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769736	2540306	2543400	276836	279822	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC3G9.11c	ckb2	SPAC3G9.11c	SPBC2G5.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987679964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769737	2540306	2538827	276836	275408	SPBC2G5.02c	SPCC63.14	ckb2	eis1	SPBC2G5.02c	SPCC63.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.502622297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769738	2540306	2541806	276836	278297	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC4G8.13c	ckb2	prz1	SPBC2G5.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.006883997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769739	2540306	2539588	276836	276146	SPBC2G5.02c	SPCC962.04	ckb2	rps1201	SPBC2G5.02c	rps12|rps12-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.051031145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769740	2540306	2543448	276836	279868	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC3H5.07	ckb2	rpl702	SPBC2G5.02c	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.21527991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769741	2540306	2542617	276836	279071	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC13A11.01c	ckb2	rga8	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517390493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769742	2540306	2540649	276836	277174	SPBC2G5.02c	SPBC19F8.08	ckb2	rps401	SPBC2G5.02c	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.985497539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769743	2543275	2540913	279703	277429	SPAC1002.05c	SPBC56F2.08c	jmj2	SPBC56F2.08c	kdm5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.886758457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769744	2543275	2540435	279703	276963	SPAC1002.05c	SPBC25B2.03	jmj2	SPBC25B2.03	kdm5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099231374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769745	2543275	2539940	279703	276484	SPAC1002.05c	SPBC16A3.10	jmj2	SPBC16A3.10	kdm5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.343434094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769746	2543275	2539749	279703	276301	SPAC1002.05c	SPBC16A3.13	jmj2	meu7	kdm5	aah4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096317497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769747	2543275	2542643	279703	279097	SPAC1002.05c	SPAC2C4.07c	jmj2	dis32	kdm5	SPAC2C4.07c|dis3L2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04490411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769748	2543275	2543356	279703	279778	SPAC1002.05c	SPAPB2C8.01	jmj2	SPAPB2C8.01	kdm5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812183504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769749	2543275	2541374	279703	277885	SPAC1002.05c	SPBPB10D8.06c	jmj2	SPBPB10D8.06c	kdm5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196138057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769750	2543275	2540455	279703	276983	SPAC1002.05c	SPBC215.05	jmj2	gpd1	kdm5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.122477276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769751	2543275	2539510	279703	276072	SPAC1002.05c	SPCC4G3.04c	jmj2	coq5	kdm5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386582398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769752	2543275	2540251	279703	276783	SPAC1002.05c	SPBC336.05c	jmj2	SPBC336.05c	kdm5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.890970308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769753	2543275	2540692	279703	277217	SPAC1002.05c	SPBC800.07c	jmj2	tsf1	kdm5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143576277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769754	2543275	2540830	279703	277348	SPAC1002.05c	SPBC18H10.16	jmj2	can1	kdm5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924736954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769755	2543275	2539961	279703	276505	SPAC1002.05c	SPBC1198.09	jmj2	ubc16	kdm5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.3793951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769756	2543275	2540359	279703	276888	SPAC1002.05c	SPBC30D10.14	jmj2	SPBC30D10.14	kdm5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980690118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769757	2543275	2543573	279703	279988	SPAC1002.05c	SPAC869.11	jmj2	cat1	kdm5	SPAC922.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.388614354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769758	2543275	2542239	279703	278711	SPAC1002.05c	SPAC18G6.02c	jmj2	chp1	kdm5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.592274165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769759	2543275	2539051	279703	275624	SPAC1002.05c	SPCC1183.11	jmj2	msy1	kdm5	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.102265144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769760	2543275	2541741	279703	278235	SPAC1002.05c	SPAC20G4.02c	jmj2	fus1	kdm5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934375566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769761	2543275	2540797	279703	277316	SPAC1002.05c	SPBC18H10.11c	jmj2	ppr2	kdm5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.57133806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769762	2543275	2540150	279703	276687	SPAC1002.05c	SPBC16E9.14c	jmj2	zrg17	kdm5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.054872907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769763	2543275	2539455	279703	276018	SPAC1002.05c	SPCC736.09c	jmj2	SPCC736.09c	kdm5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044397403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769764	2543275	2538774	279703	275356	SPAC1002.05c	SPCC162.06c	jmj2	SPCC162.06c	kdm5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769023028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769765	2543275	2540224	279703	276757	SPAC1002.05c	SPBC32H8.06	jmj2	mug93	kdm5	pi018|SPACTOKYO_453.18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.461802047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769766	2543275	2543236	279703	279664	SPAC1002.05c	SPAC8C9.04	jmj2	SPAC8C9.04	kdm5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149020984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769767	2543275	2543357	279703	279779	SPAC1002.05c	SPAC688.12c	jmj2	SPAC688.12c	kdm5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330188732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769768	2543275	2542529	279703	278987	SPAC1002.05c	SPAC1B3.04c	jmj2	SPAC1B3.04c	kdm5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098361395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769769	2543275	2543522	279703	279940	SPAC1002.05c	SPAPB24D3.08c	jmj2	SPAPB24D3.08c	kdm5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.978978851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769770	2543275	5802861	279703	857999	SPAC1002.05c	SPAC1D4.01	jmj2	tls1	kdm5	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148565709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769771	2543275	2543080	279703	279513	SPAC1002.05c	SPAC3A11.10c	jmj2	SPAC3A11.10c	kdm5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039876156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769772	2543275	2540094	279703	276632	SPAC1002.05c	SPBC146.10	jmj2	mug57	kdm5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.409520565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769773	2543275	2543477	279703	279897	SPAC1002.05c	SPAPB2B4.04c	jmj2	SPAPB2B4.04c	kdm5	pmc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815461993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769774	2543275	2541670	279703	278166	SPAC1002.05c	SPAC24H6.13	jmj2	SPAC24H6.13	kdm5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.021130909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769775	2543275	2543332	279703	279755	SPAC1002.05c	SPAPB8E5.04c	jmj2	SPAPB8E5.04c	kdm5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.669748979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769776	2543275	2543519	279703	279937	SPAC1002.05c	SPAC4F10.08	jmj2	mug126	kdm5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098851212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769777	2543275	2543304	279703	279728	SPAC1002.05c	SPAC6B12.12	jmj2	tom70	kdm5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.095426007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769778	2543275	2541103	279703	277618	SPAC1002.05c	SPBC651.06	jmj2	mug166	kdm5	csa1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877120476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769779	2543275	2539239	279703	275809	SPAC1002.05c	SPCC1020.10	jmj2	oca2	kdm5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.713195161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769780	2543275	2540000	279703	276544	SPAC1002.05c	SPBC1683.13c	jmj2	cha4	kdm5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04278661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769781	2543275	2543091	279703	279524	SPAC1002.05c	SPAC12G12.15	jmj2	sif3	kdm5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817323165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769782	2543275	2540297	279703	276828	SPAC1002.05c	SPBC24C6.08c	jmj2	bhd1	kdm5	bhd	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.414906238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769783	2543275	2540422	279703	276950	SPAC1002.05c	SPBC27.08c	jmj2	sua1	kdm5	SPBC28F2.01c|asp1|met3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.339457169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769784	2543275	2541356	279703	277867	SPAC1002.05c	SPBP35G2.12	jmj2	SPBP35G2.12	kdm5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.874437986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769785	2543275	2539169	279703	275740	SPAC1002.05c	SPCC1235.11	jmj2	mpc1	kdm5	SPCC1235.11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035721869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769786	2543275	2542185	279703	278660	SPAC1002.05c	SPAC18G6.01c	jmj2	SPAC18G6.01c	kdm5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707951433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769787	2543275	2539583	279703	276142	SPAC1002.05c	SPCC777.04	jmj2	SPCC777.04	kdm5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.342928805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769788	2543275	2542111	279703	278587	SPAC1002.05c	SPAC1687.14c	jmj2	SPAC1687.14c	kdm5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.122370348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769789	2543275	2542578	279703	279034	SPAC1002.05c	SPAC18B11.09c	jmj2	SPAC18B11.09c	kdm5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.878258932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769790	2543275	2540736	279703	277259	SPAC1002.05c	SPBC19F8.02	jmj2	SPBC19F8.02	kdm5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196626433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769791	2541109	2540060	277624	276598	SPBC6B1.02	SPBC106.01	ppk30	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.861980885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769792	2541109	2541656	277624	278152	SPBC6B1.02	SPAC25H1.06	ppk30	pcf3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384990253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769793	2541109	5802967	277624	858105	SPBC6B1.02	SPAC20G4.08	ppk30	pdc1	-	SPAC20G4.08|SPAC4F10.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196364931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769794	2541109	2538976	277624	275550	SPBC6B1.02	SPCC1840.04	ppk30	pca1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989320507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769795	2541109	2540975	277624	277491	SPBC6B1.02	SPBC354.12	ppk30	gpd3	-	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77131566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769796	2541109	2542677	277624	279130	SPBC6B1.02	SPAC26F1.10c	ppk30	pyp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19735614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769797	2541109	2543681	277624	280095	SPBC6B1.02	SPAC9.02c	ppk30	SPAC9.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.332176374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769798	2541109	2539117	277624	275689	SPBC6B1.02	SPCC74.06	ppk30	mak3	-	phk2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989746075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769799	2541109	2540929	277624	277445	SPBC6B1.02	SPBC354.03	ppk30	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.303869655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769800	2541109	2540224	277624	276757	SPBC6B1.02	SPBC32H8.06	ppk30	mug93	-	pi018|SPACTOKYO_453.18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927777611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769801	2541109	2539974	277624	276518	SPBC6B1.02	SPBC32H8.07	ppk30	git5	-	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.671930693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769802	2541109	2541746	277624	278240	SPBC6B1.02	SPAC20G4.04c	ppk30	hus1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.849024387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769803	2541109	2539030	277624	275603	SPBC6B1.02	SPCP1E11.02	ppk30	ppk38	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.851462737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769804	2541109	2543160	277624	279591	SPBC6B1.02	SPAC31A2.14	ppk30	bun107	-	wdr48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.524360236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769805	2541109	2541432	277624	277937	SPBC6B1.02	SPAC1F5.05c	ppk30	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.841330157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769806	2541109	2543662	277624	280076	SPBC6B1.02	SPAC9.07c	ppk30	SPAC9.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991610439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769807	2541109	2539346	277624	275912	SPBC6B1.02	SPCC569.04	ppk30	SPCC569.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.915653343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769808	2541109	2541806	277624	278297	SPBC6B1.02	SPAC4G8.13c	ppk30	prz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.458117546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769809	2541109	2542208	277624	278683	SPBC6B1.02	SPAC17G8.08c	ppk30	SPAC17G8.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.333470356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769810	2540234	2542577	276766	279033	SPBC336.12c	SPAC19G12.15c	cdc10	tpp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044124038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769811	2540234	2543064	276766	279497	SPBC336.12c	SPAC3G6.01	cdc10	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.555861488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769812	2540234	2542237	276766	278709	SPBC336.12c	SPAC19E9.02	cdc10	fin1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.138939715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769813	2540234	2539930	276766	276474	SPBC336.12c	SPBC1198.11c	cdc10	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.175398704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769814	2540234	2543572	276766	279987	SPBC336.12c	SPAC4G8.04	cdc10	SPAC4G8.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.880308434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769815	2540234	2539226	276766	275796	SPBC336.12c	SPCC16C4.20c	cdc10	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.191586085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769816	2540234	2539244	276766	275814	SPBC336.12c	SPCC1672.06c	cdc10	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.200031263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769817	2540234	2539023	276766	275596	SPBC336.12c	SPCC594.05c	cdc10	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645599932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769818	2540234	2542873	276766	279318	SPBC336.12c	SPAC9G1.02	cdc10	wis4	-	wak1|wik1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.255330374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769819	2540234	2539974	276766	276518	SPBC336.12c	SPBC32H8.07	cdc10	git5	-	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.858713451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769820	2540234	2541628	276766	278124	SPBC336.12c	SPAC110.02	cdc10	pds5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931014608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769821	2540234	2542881	276766	279326	SPBC336.12c	SPAC13F5.03c	cdc10	gld1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.323774272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769822	2540234	2542628	276766	279082	SPBC336.12c	SPAC24H6.06	cdc10	sld3	-	mug175	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.252765053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769823	2540234	2542904	276766	279348	SPBC336.12c	SPAC144.11	cdc10	rps1102	-	rps11|rps11-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.920430469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769824	2540234	2539189	276766	275760	SPBC336.12c	SPCC1682.16	cdc10	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933976409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769825	2540234	2538861	276766	275441	SPBC336.12c	SPCC1620.11	cdc10	nup97	-	mug87	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.405493311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769826	2540234	2542890	276766	279334	SPBC336.12c	SPAC13G6.14	cdc10	aps1	-	SPAC24B11.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983404954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769827	2541287	2540060	277800	276598	SPBP22H7.05c	SPBC106.01	abo2	mph1	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.076411502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769828	2541287	2542689	277800	279142	SPBP22H7.05c	SPAC29B12.04	abo2	snz1	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.347135751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769829	2541287	2540919	277800	277435	SPBP22H7.05c	SPBC543.07	abo2	pek1	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	mkk1|skh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.898155525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769830	2541287	2538690	277800	275275	SPBP22H7.05c	SPCC1393.05	abo2	ers1	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.404646557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769831	2541287	2540229	277800	276761	SPBP22H7.05c	SPBC31F10.15c	abo2	atp15	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043505786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769832	2541287	2541927	277800	278415	SPBP22H7.05c	SPAC222.12c	abo2	atp2	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988212384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769833	2541287	2538848	277800	275429	SPBP22H7.05c	SPCC613.12c	abo2	raf1	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.742839002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769834	2540382	2542205	276911	278680	SPBC27B12.05	SPAC1A6.05c	SPBC27B12.05	ptl3	-	SPAC1A6.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320738253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769835	2540382	2543573	276911	279988	SPBC27B12.05	SPAC869.11	SPBC27B12.05	cat1	-	SPAC922.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.566969701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769836	2540382	2542168	276911	278643	SPBC27B12.05	SPAC17A5.16	SPBC27B12.05	ftp105	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.981738131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769837	2540382	2539293	276911	275861	SPBC27B12.05	SPCC553.08c	SPBC27B12.05	ria1	-	SPCC553.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.073999394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769838	2540382	2543396	276911	279818	SPBC27B12.05	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC27B12.05	dsc4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331628299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769839	2540382	2542673	276911	279126	SPBC27B12.05	SPAC26A3.11	SPBC27B12.05	SPAC26A3.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979239943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769840	2540382	2540699	276911	277223	SPBC27B12.05	SPBC800.08	SPBC27B12.05	gcd10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.943120632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769841	2540382	2539920	276911	276464	SPBC27B12.05	SPBC119.08	SPBC27B12.05	pmk1	-	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390114244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769842	2540382	2543333	276911	279756	SPBC27B12.05	SPAC694.02	SPBC27B12.05	SPAC694.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.007136148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769843	2540382	2543448	276911	279868	SPBC27B12.05	SPAC3H5.07	SPBC27B12.05	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442751137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769844	2542516	2539050	278974	275623	SPAC2F7.04	SPCC11E10.08	pmc2	rik1	med1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.189167542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769845	2542516	2540279	278974	276810	SPAC2F7.04	SPBC3B8.04c	pmc2	SPBC3B8.04c	med1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.374688403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769846	2542516	2542518	278974	278976	SPAC2F7.04	SPAC1B3.16c	pmc2	vht1	med1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568024552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769847	2542516	2540913	278974	277429	SPAC2F7.04	SPBC56F2.08c	pmc2	SPBC56F2.08c	med1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.551174673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769848	2542516	2541552	278974	278051	SPAC2F7.04	SPAC1142.08	pmc2	fhl1	med1	SPAC8C9.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51818456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769849	2542516	2543592	278974	280007	SPAC2F7.04	SPAC4F10.18	pmc2	nup37	med1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.556732806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769850	2542516	2539035	278974	275608	SPAC2F7.04	SPCC794.09c	pmc2	tef101	med1	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.829281321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769851	2542516	2542237	278974	278709	SPAC2F7.04	SPAC19E9.02	pmc2	fin1	med1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.848600151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769852	2542516	3361561	278974	280637	SPAC2F7.04	SPAC11E3.01c	pmc2	swr1	med1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.014488369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769853	2542516	2543164	278974	279595	SPAC2F7.04	SPAC3G6.06c	pmc2	rad2	med1	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441231112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769854	2542516	2539420	278974	275985	SPAC2F7.04	SPCC970.07c	pmc2	raf2	med1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.416900792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769855	2542516	2540979	278974	277495	SPAC2F7.04	SPBC3H7.10	pmc2	elp6	med1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043119845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769856	2542516	2538847	278974	275428	SPAC2F7.04	SPCC594.06c	pmc2	SPCC594.06c	med1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195530534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769857	2542516	2539249	278974	275819	SPAC2F7.04	SPCC1450.05c	pmc2	rox3	med1	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.073036797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769858	2542516	2542012	278974	278495	SPAC2F7.04	SPAC23C11.02c	pmc2	rps23	med1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.276342832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769859	2542516	2541346	278974	277857	SPAC2F7.04	SPBP8B7.08c	pmc2	ppm1	med1	SPBP8B7.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807650663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769860	2542516	2541323	278974	277835	SPAC2F7.04	SPBP35G2.14	pmc2	SPBP35G2.14	med1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573164991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769861	2542516	2540425	278974	276953	SPAC2F7.04	SPBC27.06c	pmc2	mgr2	med1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.052001255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769862	2542516	2539365	278974	275931	SPAC2F7.04	SPCC24B10.16c	pmc2	SPCC24B10.16c	med1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448205003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769863	2542516	2542023	278974	278506	SPAC2F7.04	SPAC20H4.10	pmc2	ufd2	med1	SPAC145.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.345464506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769864	2542516	2543426	278974	279846	SPAC2F7.04	SPAC631.02	pmc2	bdf2	med1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.097807163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769865	2542516	2540825	278974	277343	SPAC2F7.04	SPBC428.08c	pmc2	clr4	med1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.961012132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769866	2542516	2539733	278974	276285	SPAC2F7.04	SPBC16E9.12c	pmc2	pab2	med1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.97440058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769867	2542516	2543406	278974	279828	SPAC2F7.04	SPAC9.12c	pmc2	atp12	med1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.117180904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769868	2542516	2539667	278974	276222	SPAC2F7.04	SPBC13G1.08c	pmc2	ash2	med1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.618405161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769869	2542516	2542032	278974	278514	SPAC2F7.04	SPAC23C11.04c	pmc2	pnk1	med1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.333216006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769870	2542516	2541595	278974	278092	SPAC2F7.04	SPAC1565.01	pmc2	SPAC1565.01	med1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.378819376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769871	2542516	2541720	278974	278214	SPAC2F7.04	SPAC23H3.13c	pmc2	gpa2	med1	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379231953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769872	2542516	2541614	278974	278111	SPAC2F7.04	SPAC29A4.20	pmc2	elp3	med1	kat9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.705233059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769873	2542516	2538690	278974	275275	SPAC2F7.04	SPCC1393.05	pmc2	ers1	med1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808152334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769874	2542516	2542550	278974	279007	SPAC2F7.04	SPAC1B3.02c	pmc2	SPAC1B3.02c	med1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.80252217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769875	2542516	2538848	278974	275429	SPAC2F7.04	SPCC613.12c	pmc2	raf1	med1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.801683038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769876	2542516	2541017	278974	277532	SPAC2F7.04	SPBC36.07	pmc2	elp1	med1	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.332882693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769877	2542516	2541175	278974	277689	SPAC2F7.04	SPBC839.13c	pmc2	rpl1601	med1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.747145615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769878	2542516	2540498	278974	277026	SPAC2F7.04	SPBC27.02c	pmc2	ask1	med1	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.82328842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769879	2542516	2539030	278974	275603	SPAC2F7.04	SPCP1E11.02	pmc2	ppk38	med1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708636271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769880	2542516	2542458	278974	278919	SPAC2F7.04	SPAC30.02c	pmc2	SPAC30.02c	med1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989293333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769881	2542516	2542418	278974	278881	SPAC2F7.04	SPAC1805.07c	pmc2	dad2	med1	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.011129124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769882	2542516	2541229	278974	277743	SPAC2F7.04	SPBC839.05c	pmc2	rps1701	med1	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767426148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769883	2542516	2539668	278974	276223	SPAC2F7.04	SPBC11B10.10c	pmc2	pht1	med1	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632368589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769884	2542516	2540555	278974	277082	SPAC2F7.04	SPBP16F5.02	pmc2	mcs2	med1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.678124835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769885	2542516	2539928	278974	276472	SPAC2F7.04	SPBC1604.08c	pmc2	imp1	med1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508357817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769886	2542516	2538694	278974	275279	SPAC2F7.04	SPCC191.09c	pmc2	gst1	med1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.856155445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769887	2542516	2543384	278974	279806	SPAC2F7.04	SPAC637.06	pmc2	gmh5	med1	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922134215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769888	2542516	2539743	278974	276295	SPAC2F7.04	SPBC16A3.08c	pmc2	oga1	med1	SPBC16A3.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713670477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769889	2539434	2542577	275997	279033	SPCC757.09c	SPAC19G12.15c	rnc1	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.535810008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769890	2539434	2543637	275997	280051	SPCC757.09c	SPAC3H8.02	rnc1	csr102	-	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580429738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769891	2539434	2542378	275997	278842	SPCC757.09c	SPAC1805.04	rnc1	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.406719102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769892	2539434	2538896	275997	275474	SPCC757.09c	SPCC584.11c	rnc1	SPCC584.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572565461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769893	2539434	2541117	275997	277632	SPCC757.09c	SPBC646.13	rnc1	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.563220212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769894	2539434	2541345	275997	277856	SPCC757.09c	SPBP35G2.07	rnc1	ilv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.062804537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769895	2539434	2541633	275997	278129	SPCC757.09c	SPAC664.01c	rnc1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.83242832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769896	2539434	2542701	275997	279154	SPCC757.09c	SPAC26H5.05	rnc1	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453747111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769897	2539434	2542677	275997	279130	SPCC757.09c	SPAC26F1.10c	rnc1	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.346783346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769898	2539434	2541012	275997	277527	SPCC757.09c	SPBC3H7.12	rnc1	rav2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.419462647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769899	2539434	2542273	275997	278742	SPCC757.09c	SPAC17H9.13c	rnc1	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.29923149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769900	2539434	2539564	275997	276125	SPCC757.09c	SPCC550.12	rnc1	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.914115088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769901	2539434	2538801	275997	275382	SPCC757.09c	SPCC285.13c	rnc1	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.307816178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769902	2539434	2542689	275997	279142	SPCC757.09c	SPAC29B12.04	rnc1	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.123891293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769903	2539434	2539249	275997	275819	SPCC757.09c	SPCC1450.05c	rnc1	rox3	-	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.008428527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769904	2539434	2539117	275997	275689	SPCC757.09c	SPCC74.06	rnc1	mak3	-	phk2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.807992877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769905	2539434	2540463	275997	276991	SPCC757.09c	SPBC2F12.15c	rnc1	pfa3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.01474908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769906	2539434	2541323	275997	277835	SPCC757.09c	SPBP35G2.14	rnc1	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.873206074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769907	2539434	2542698	275997	279151	SPCC757.09c	SPAC26H5.09c	rnc1	SPAC26H5.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.345873817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769908	2539434	2543563	275997	279979	SPCC757.09c	SPAC664.02c	rnc1	arp8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.892273335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769909	2539434	2539352	275997	275918	SPCC757.09c	SPCC188.07	rnc1	ccq1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.394960925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769910	2539434	2542253	275997	278723	SPCC757.09c	SPAC17H9.04c	rnc1	SPAC17H9.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851262353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769911	2539434	2542981	275997	279419	SPCC757.09c	SPAC824.02	rnc1	bst1	-	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579224769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769912	2539434	2540825	275997	277343	SPCC757.09c	SPBC428.08c	rnc1	clr4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.354499733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769913	2539434	2542036	275997	278518	SPCC757.09c	SPAC23A1.19c	rnc1	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.348501474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769914	2539434	2539388	275997	275953	SPCC757.09c	SPCC24B10.12	rnc1	cgi121	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.168521122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769915	2539434	2543514	275997	279932	SPCC757.09c	SPAC4D7.03	rnc1	pop2	-	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.362292478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769916	2539434	2542950	275997	279390	SPCC757.09c	SPAC12B10.03	rnc1	bun62	-	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.828038306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769917	2539434	2543020	275997	279456	SPCC757.09c	SPAC10F6.13c	rnc1	SPAC10F6.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.906754969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769918	2539434	2540797	275997	277316	SPCC757.09c	SPBC18H10.11c	rnc1	ppr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046566892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769919	2539434	2539845	275997	276393	SPCC757.09c	SPBC12C2.02c	rnc1	ste20	-	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324607271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769920	2539434	2538770	275997	275353	SPCC757.09c	SPCC1753.02c	rnc1	git3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.708936734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769921	2539434	2542652	275997	279106	SPCC757.09c	SPAC1687.15	rnc1	gsk3	-	skp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.821897871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769922	2539434	2539733	275997	276285	SPCC757.09c	SPBC16E9.12c	rnc1	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.475312332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769923	2539434	2540673	275997	277198	SPCC757.09c	SPBC1D7.03	rnc1	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.340866526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769924	2539434	2541889	275997	278379	SPCC757.09c	SPAC2F7.03c	rnc1	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.285265297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769925	2539434	2541496	275997	277998	SPCC757.09c	SPAC23D3.09	rnc1	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.970490532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769926	2539434	2539689	275997	276244	SPCC757.09c	SPBC1861.03	rnc1	mak10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.746801709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769927	2539434	2543643	275997	280057	SPCC757.09c	SPAC3G9.07c	rnc1	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.676824537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769928	2539434	2541899	275997	278389	SPCC757.09c	SPAC22E12.11c	rnc1	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.616179831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769929	2539434	2538852	275997	275433	SPCC757.09c	SPCC4E9.01c	rnc1	rec11	-	SPCC550.16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508588094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769930	2539434	2539667	275997	276222	SPCC757.09c	SPBC13G1.08c	rnc1	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.056166985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769931	2539434	2539974	275997	276518	SPCC757.09c	SPBC32H8.07	rnc1	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.243228307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769932	2539434	2541900	275997	278390	SPCC757.09c	SPAC23H4.17c	rnc1	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1637115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769933	2539434	5802861	275997	857999	SPCC757.09c	SPAC1D4.01	rnc1	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.47084623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769934	2539434	2542439	275997	278901	SPCC757.09c	SPAC17A5.08	rnc1	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440420687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769935	2539434	2541708	275997	278203	SPCC757.09c	SPAC31A2.02	rnc1	trm112	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.381343101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769936	2539434	2541464	275997	277966	SPCC757.09c	SPAC222.08c	rnc1	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.052185282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769937	2539434	2540342	275997	276871	SPCC757.09c	SPBC2G2.01c	rnc1	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377731541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769938	2539434	2540967	275997	277483	SPCC757.09c	SPBC36B7.08c	rnc1	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.55908895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769939	2539434	2542597	275997	279051	SPCC757.09c	SPAP8A3.07c	rnc1	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.221561422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769940	2539434	2543517	275997	279935	SPCC757.09c	SPAC3G9.05	rnc1	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.061718382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769941	2539434	2540533	275997	277061	SPCC757.09c	SPBC29A10.16c	rnc1	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046743905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769942	2539434	2542550	275997	279007	SPCC757.09c	SPAC1B3.02c	rnc1	SPAC1B3.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.897293315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769943	2539434	2542255	275997	278725	SPCC757.09c	SPAC57A7.08	rnc1	pzh1	-	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.623642166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769944	2539434	2541488	275997	277990	SPCC757.09c	SPAC227.17c	rnc1	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.270603234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769945	2539434	2540930	275997	277446	SPCC757.09c	SPBC354.10	rnc1	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769497703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769946	2539434	2540821	275997	277339	SPCC757.09c	SPBC800.03	rnc1	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.795741011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769947	2539434	2541909	275997	278399	SPCC757.09c	SPAC227.01c	rnc1	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.145777994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769948	2539434	2540498	275997	277026	SPCC757.09c	SPBC27.02c	rnc1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.538475997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769949	2539434	2542883	275997	279328	SPCC757.09c	SPAC1486.04c	rnc1	alm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.481959596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769950	2539434	2539925	275997	276469	SPCC757.09c	SPBC16H5.13	rnc1	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.623697992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769951	2539434	2540800	275997	277319	SPCC757.09c	SPBC409.20c	rnc1	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.678537833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769952	2539434	2543304	275997	279728	SPCC757.09c	SPAC6B12.12	rnc1	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.284698965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769953	2539434	2542541	275997	278998	SPCC757.09c	SPAC1B3.03c	rnc1	wis2	-	cyp5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319732038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769954	2539434	2538966	275997	275540	SPCC757.09c	SPCC18.10	rnc1	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.054972166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769955	2539434	2543096	275997	279528	SPCC757.09c	SPAC977.05c	rnc1	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448647057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769956	2539434	2539471	275997	276034	SPCC757.09c	SPCC576.14	rnc1	dph5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327685998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769957	2539434	2541531	275997	278031	SPCC757.09c	SPAC25A8.01c	rnc1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.603981901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769958	2539434	2540699	275997	277223	SPCC757.09c	SPBC800.08	rnc1	gcd10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.000650117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769959	2539434	2542418	275997	278881	SPCC757.09c	SPAC1805.07c	rnc1	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.95905805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769960	2539434	2542222	275997	278695	SPCC757.09c	SPAC31G5.18c	rnc1	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57049807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769961	2539434	2540629	275997	277155	SPCC757.09c	SPBC21D10.09c	rnc1	rkr1	-	SPBC21D10.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513547707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769962	2539434	2539668	275997	276223	SPCC757.09c	SPBC11B10.10c	rnc1	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.538406579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769963	2539434	2542635	275997	279089	SPCC757.09c	SPAC24H6.09	rnc1	gef1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.707806217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769964	2539434	2539207	275997	275777	SPCC757.09c	SPCC285.09c	rnc1	cgs2	-	pde1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.409112852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769965	2539434	2543044	275997	279479	SPCC757.09c	SPAC3C7.12	rnc1	tip1	-	noc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.939340387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769966	2539434	3361117	275997	280193	SPCC757.09c	SPCC663.17	rnc1	wtf15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442723223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769967	2539434	2539726	275997	276278	SPCC757.09c	SPBC13E7.08c	rnc1	leo1	-	SPBC13E7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.741608141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769968	2539434	2541941	275997	278428	SPCC757.09c	SPAC20H4.03c	rnc1	tfs1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.884769572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769969	2539434	2543337	275997	279760	SPCC757.09c	SPAC959.08	rnc1	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.908337024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769970	2539434	2541806	275997	278297	SPCC757.09c	SPAC4G8.13c	rnc1	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.700216579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769971	2539434	2543387	275997	279809	SPCC757.09c	SPAPB1E7.02c	rnc1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387019054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769972	2539434	2541272	275997	277786	SPCC757.09c	SPBC947.03c	rnc1	naa38	-	mak31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.28314227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769973	2539434	2543472	275997	279892	SPCC757.09c	SPAC959.04c	rnc1	omh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.201815808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769974	2539434	2540320	275997	276850	SPCC757.09c	SPBC3D6.04c	rnc1	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.623556528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769975	2539082	2542585	275654	279040	SPCC126.03	SPAC31A2.13c	pus1	sft1	lps1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702362904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769976	2539082	2541522	275654	278023	SPCC126.03	SPAC23E2.01	pus1	fep1	lps1	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992850186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769977	2539082	2542981	275654	279419	SPCC126.03	SPAC824.02	pus1	bst1	lps1	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331067839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769978	2539082	2539574	275654	276134	SPCC126.03	SPCPB16A4.04c	pus1	trm8	lps1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.606769068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769979	2539082	2539388	275654	275953	SPCC126.03	SPCC24B10.12	pus1	cgi121	lps1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.271694571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769980	2539082	2542311	275654	278777	SPCC126.03	SPAC16A10.05c	pus1	dad1	lps1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932745813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769981	2539082	2538821	275654	275402	SPCC126.03	SPCC584.01c	pus1	SPCC584.01c	lps1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.843050258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769982	2539082	2539845	275654	276393	SPCC126.03	SPBC12C2.02c	pus1	ste20	lps1	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049159699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769983	2539082	2538770	275654	275353	SPCC126.03	SPCC1753.02c	pus1	git3	lps1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770159282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769984	2539082	2538706	275654	275290	SPCC126.03	SPCC338.08	pus1	ctp1	lps1	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.981920278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769985	2539082	2541283	275654	277796	SPCC126.03	SPBP8B7.02	pus1	rng9	lps1	SPBP8B7.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099419765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769986	2539082	3361520	275654	280596	SPCC126.03	SPAC1610.02c	pus1	SPAC1610.02c	lps1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321860447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769987	2539082	2541713	275654	278208	SPCC126.03	SPAC3A12.12	pus1	atp11	lps1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.30428484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769988	2539082	2543628	275654	280042	SPCC126.03	SPAC3H8.10	pus1	spo20	lps1	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779614593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769989	2539082	2543602	275654	280017	SPCC126.03	SPAPB1A11.04c	pus1	mca1	lps1	SPAPB1A11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.067303106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769990	2539082	2542094	275654	278571	SPCC126.03	SPAC29B12.06c	pus1	rcd1	lps1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.848430743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769991	2543111	2542207	279543	278682	SPAC806.07	SPAC17H9.10c	ndk1	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.937385673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769992	2543111	2539930	279543	276474	SPAC806.07	SPBC1198.11c	ndk1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.117177234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769993	2543111	2538847	279543	275428	SPAC806.07	SPCC594.06c	ndk1	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.747288651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769994	2543111	2542861	279543	279307	SPAC806.07	SPAC13G7.13c	ndk1	msa1	-	SPAC6C3.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.937222876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769995	2543111	2542014	279543	278497	SPAC806.07	SPAC20H4.04	ndk1	fml2	-	mfh2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256274885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769996	2543111	2542007	279543	278490	SPAC806.07	SPAC20H4.07	ndk1	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196202495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769997	2543111	2539958	279543	276502	SPAC806.07	SPBC1718.07c	ndk1	zfs1	-	moc4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818249032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769998	2543111	2541900	279543	278390	SPAC806.07	SPAC23H4.17c	ndk1	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711033855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
769999	2543111	2541395	279543	277904	SPAC806.07	SPBP8B7.25	ndk1	cyp4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.895533273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770000	2543111	2540533	279543	277061	SPAC806.07	SPBC29A10.16c	ndk1	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329335759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770001	2543111	2541762	279543	278256	SPAC806.07	SPAC139.01c	ndk1	SPAC139.01c	-	SPAC955.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.456982137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770002	2543111	2542167	279543	278642	SPAC806.07	SPAC17C9.11c	ndk1	SPAC17C9.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987687416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770003	2543111	2541027	279543	277542	SPAC806.07	SPBC409.16c	ndk1	saw1	-	SPBC409.16c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814543946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770004	2543111	2541531	279543	278031	SPAC806.07	SPAC25A8.01c	ndk1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.166750326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770005	2543111	2540699	279543	277223	SPAC806.07	SPBC800.08	ndk1	gcd10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.202878765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770006	2543111	2542059	279543	278537	SPAC806.07	SPAC328.06	ndk1	ubp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.124414094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770007	2539081	2539937	275653	276481	SPCC1259.09c	SPBC1539.08	pdx1	arf6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.155069162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770008	2539081	2543483	275653	279903	SPCC1259.09c	SPAPB2B4.02	pdx1	grx5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.189340342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770009	2539081	2540342	275653	276871	SPCC1259.09c	SPBC2G2.01c	pdx1	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510484094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770010	2543619	2539050	280033	275623	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC11E10.08	ypa1	rik1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.490763846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770011	2543619	2539147	280033	275719	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC622.12c	ypa1	gdh1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.021633372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770012	2543619	2538721	280033	275305	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC1494.10	ypa1	adn3	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPCC70.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508936856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770013	2543619	2541204	280033	277718	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC839.06	ypa1	cta3	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPBC24E9.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817330641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770014	2543619	2538961	280033	275535	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC285.14	ypa1	trs130	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.464425077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770015	2543619	2540105	280033	276642	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC106.04	ypa1	ada1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.499133872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770016	2543619	2543617	280033	280031	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC4A8.10	ypa1	SPAC4A8.10	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.682135403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770017	2543619	2542598	280033	279052	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC6G10.08	ypa1	idp1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809708041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770018	2543619	2543637	280033	280051	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC3H8.02	ypa1	csr102	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.768791119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770019	2543619	2542372	280033	278836	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC1F3.03	ypa1	SPAC1F3.03	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.568776992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770020	2543619	2541570	280033	278067	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC6G9.09c	ypa1	rpl2401	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	rpl24|rpl24-01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811849686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770021	2543619	2538977	280033	275551	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC1020.06c	ypa1	tal1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.98064313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770022	2543619	2540131	280033	276668	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC1778.05c	ypa1	SPBC1778.05c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.088280547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770023	2543619	2540524	280033	277052	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC21B10.08c	ypa1	SPBC21B10.08c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.367276625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770024	2543619	2542293	280033	278761	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC17G8.14c	ypa1	pck1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPAC22H10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.369484244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770025	2543619	2539035	280033	275608	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC794.09c	ypa1	tef101	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.335888673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770026	2543619	2543339	280033	279762	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC630.13c	ypa1	tsc2	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.496806917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770027	2543619	2542237	280033	278709	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC19E9.02	ypa1	fin1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.368090411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770028	2543619	2539202	280033	275773	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC162.10	ypa1	ppk33	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.701688219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770029	2543619	2539939	280033	276483	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC11G11.01	ypa1	fis1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504949159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770030	2543619	2541104	280033	277619	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC6B1.03c	ypa1	SPBC6B1.03c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443138228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770031	2543619	2540433	280033	276961	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC2D10.06	ypa1	rep1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	rec16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643312804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770032	2543619	2540296	280033	276827	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC2D10.05	ypa1	exg3	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.448742462	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770033	2543619	2541117	280033	277632	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC646.13	ypa1	sds23	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.988172163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770034	2543619	2541345	280033	277856	SPAC4F10.04	SPBP35G2.07	ypa1	ilv1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.956063452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770035	2543619	2541633	280033	278129	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC664.01c	ypa1	swi6	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.264335825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770036	2543619	2540035	280033	276577	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC16A3.06	ypa1	SPBC16A3.06	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.074498159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770037	2543619	2540694	280033	277218	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC19C7.10	ypa1	bqt4	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570851452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770038	2543619	2541584	280033	278081	SPAC4F10.04	SPAP32A8.02	ypa1	SPAP32A8.02	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.327138736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770039	2543619	2542103	280033	278579	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC31G5.11	ypa1	pac2	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387906183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770040	2543619	2540579	280033	277105	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC28E12.02	ypa1	SPBC28E12.02	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPBC9B6.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852929062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770041	2543619	2542345	280033	278811	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC1705.02	ypa1	SPAC1705.02	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPAC1F2.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44414243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770042	2543619	2542040	280033	278521	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC212.01c	ypa1	SPAC212.01c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.199616332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770043	2543619	2540664	280033	277189	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC215.02	ypa1	bob1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.84349434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770044	2543619	3361436	280033	280512	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC1296.01c	ypa1	SPAC1296.01c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPAC22F3.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81558796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770045	2543619	2543320	280033	279744	SPAC4F10.04	SPAPJ695.01c	ypa1	SPAPJ695.01c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.556395364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770046	2543619	2539210	280033	275780	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC2H8.05c	ypa1	dbl1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPCC2H8.05c|SPCC63.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.919858082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770047	2543619	3361375	280033	280451	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC212.06c	ypa1	SPAC212.06c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.269258869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770048	2543619	2540975	280033	277491	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC354.12	ypa1	gpd3	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384796074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770049	2543619	2539420	280033	275985	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC970.07c	ypa1	raf2	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.856272467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770050	2543619	2541208	280033	277722	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC887.04c	ypa1	lub1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.159654966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770051	2543619	2538847	280033	275428	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC594.06c	ypa1	SPCC594.06c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.288928309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770052	2543619	2539564	280033	276125	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC550.12	ypa1	arp6	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873727066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770053	2543619	2539463	280033	276026	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC550.11	ypa1	SPCC550.11	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.62684114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770054	2543619	2540029	280033	276573	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC16A3.01	ypa1	spn3	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.268313083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770055	2543619	2543043	280033	279478	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC3F10.13	ypa1	ucp6	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633363019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770056	2543619	2543681	280033	280095	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC9.02c	ypa1	SPAC9.02c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32693481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770057	2543619	2542724	280033	279175	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC767.01c	ypa1	vps1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.878845333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770058	2543619	2543453	280033	279873	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC3G9.03	ypa1	rpl2301	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.466979251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770059	2543619	2541503	280033	278005	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC22A12.01c	ypa1	pso2	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPAC56F8.17c|snm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.478157787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770060	2543619	2541026	280033	277541	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC337.09	ypa1	erg28	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.639096323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770061	2543619	2540417	280033	276945	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC21C3.06	ypa1	SPBC21C3.06	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320563189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770062	2543619	2540095	280033	276633	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC115.03	ypa1	SPBC115.03	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPBC839.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.377076117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770063	2543619	2540160	280033	276695	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC1773.17c	ypa1	SPBC1773.17c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPBP26C9.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380847536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770064	2543619	2543048	280033	279483	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC3F10.02c	ypa1	trk1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	sptrk	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.009810409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770065	2543619	2541119	280033	277634	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC651.11c	ypa1	apm3	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.188038436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770066	2543619	2539937	280033	276481	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC1539.08	ypa1	arf6	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.815833091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770067	2543619	2540993	280033	277509	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC342.01c	ypa1	alg6	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPBC3F6.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776280243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770068	2543619	2540727	280033	277250	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC1921.03c	ypa1	mex67	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148764466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770069	2543619	2541323	280033	277835	SPAC4F10.04	SPBP35G2.14	ypa1	SPBP35G2.14	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331471123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770070	2543619	2540425	280033	276953	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC27.06c	ypa1	mgr2	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095196837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770071	2543619	2542318	280033	278784	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC16C9.05	ypa1	cph1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.97064575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770072	2543619	2541527	280033	278027	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC31A2.09c	ypa1	apm4	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.042449084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770073	2543619	2542969	280033	279409	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC4G8.10	ypa1	gos1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383820541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770074	2543619	2542220	280033	278694	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC1A6.03c	ypa1	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.261657501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770075	2543619	2541923	280033	278411	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC23C4.09c	ypa1	SPAC23C4.09c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.054774157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770076	2543619	2540127	280033	276664	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC106.20	ypa1	exo70	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPBC582.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.68043338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770077	2543619	2539648	280033	276203	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC1198.08	ypa1	SPBC1198.08	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.008708179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770078	2543619	2543641	280033	280055	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC3H5.08c	ypa1	SPAC3H5.08c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.117938481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770079	2543619	2538698	280033	275283	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC1442.02	ypa1	SPCC1442.02	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPCC1450.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.44349751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770080	2543619	2538927	280033	275503	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC1795.09	ypa1	yps1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.317876549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770081	2543619	2541416	280033	277923	SPAC4F10.04	SPBCPT2R1.01c	ypa1	SPBCPT2R1.01c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPBPB2B2.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.845636222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770082	2543619	2542373	280033	278837	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC1805.06c	ypa1	hem2	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923426188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770083	2543619	2542530	280033	278988	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC1399.02	ypa1	SPAC1399.02	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387596418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770084	2543619	2538972	280033	275546	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC1739.15	ypa1	wtf21	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	wtf3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.974989718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770085	2543619	2539381	280033	275947	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC1739.10	ypa1	mug33	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.20128739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770086	2543619	2542253	280033	278723	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC17H9.04c	ypa1	SPAC17H9.04c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.323521874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770087	2543619	2540825	280033	277343	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC428.08c	ypa1	clr4	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.268319491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770088	2543619	2540964	280033	277480	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC365.16	ypa1	SPBC365.16	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.891413675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770089	2543619	2539098	280033	275670	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC24B10.18	ypa1	SPCC24B10.18	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713000809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770090	2543619	2539237	280033	275807	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC24B10.13	ypa1	skb5	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.752659981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770091	2543619	2538876	280033	275455	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC4B3.02c	ypa1	SPCC4B3.02c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.986391055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770092	2543619	2539051	280033	275624	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC1183.11	ypa1	msy1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.870734668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770093	2543619	2543020	280033	279456	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC10F6.13c	ypa1	SPAC10F6.13c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.976564579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770094	2543619	2538821	280033	275402	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC584.01c	ypa1	SPCC584.01c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.045868605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770095	2543619	2540797	280033	277316	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC18H10.11c	ypa1	ppr2	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.146814656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770096	2543619	2541249	280033	277763	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC947.01	ypa1	alf1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPBC947.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.37026041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770097	2543619	2541776	280033	278270	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC23H3.05c	ypa1	swd1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.504064009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770098	2543619	2543144	280033	279576	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC3F10.05c	ypa1	mug113	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.193282458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770099	2543619	2540647	280033	277172	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC18H10.07	ypa1	SPBC18H10.07	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516150142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770100	2543619	2541160	280033	277675	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC725.09c	ypa1	hob3	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.699223631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770101	2543619	2542776	280033	279225	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC167.01	ypa1	ire1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	ppk4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.190081507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770102	2543619	3361491	280033	280567	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC1805.08	ypa1	dlc1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.456086993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770103	2543619	2539754	280033	276306	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC16C6.04	ypa1	dbl6	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPBC16C6.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.631933053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770104	2543619	2540673	280033	277198	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC1D7.03	ypa1	mug80	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.999493194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770105	2543619	2542464	280033	278925	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC1A6.09c	ypa1	lag1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.249731556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770106	2543619	2541889	280033	278379	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC2F7.03c	ypa1	pom1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.584542359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770107	2543619	2540886	280033	277403	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC4F6.10	ypa1	vps901	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.556582763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770108	2543619	2539219	280033	275789	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC1795.01c	ypa1	mad3	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPCC895.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9464915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770109	2543619	2543531	280033	279949	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC926.06c	ypa1	SPAC926.06c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	lrr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.761877529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770110	2543619	2542469	280033	278930	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC19A8.04	ypa1	erg5	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	cyp61	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.051632513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770111	2543619	2539603	280033	276161	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC1289.06c	ypa1	ppr8	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091694701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770112	2543619	2542651	280033	279105	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC24C9.12c	ypa1	SPAC24C9.12c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6410614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770113	2543619	2540086	280033	276624	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC16H5.12c	ypa1	SPBC16H5.12c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.011537083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770114	2543619	2543250	280033	279678	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC3G9.15c	ypa1	fcf2	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.554357869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770115	2543619	2538852	280033	275433	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC4E9.01c	ypa1	rec11	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPCC550.16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.439037448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770116	2543619	2539284	280033	275852	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC584.15c	ypa1	SPCC584.15c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.915587974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770117	2543619	2541187	280033	277701	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC776.14	ypa1	plh1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780181498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770118	2543619	2538769	280033	275352	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC126.04c	ypa1	sgf73	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321452495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770119	2543619	2539667	280033	276222	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC13G1.08c	ypa1	ash2	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448356692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770120	2543619	2538873	280033	275452	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC306.11	ypa1	SPCC306.11	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.07318494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770121	2543619	2542946	280033	279386	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC6F12.03c	ypa1	fsv1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.384752107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770122	2543619	2539850	280033	276398	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC15D4.07c	ypa1	atg9	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	apg9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.875485414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770123	2543619	2539974	280033	276518	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC32H8.07	ypa1	git5	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.902015182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770124	2543619	2541720	280033	278214	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC23H3.13c	ypa1	gpa2	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.283826211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770125	2543619	2543495	280033	279914	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC513.03	ypa1	mfm2	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.191052819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770126	2543619	2540836	280033	277354	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC18H10.19	ypa1	vps38	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.211411531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770127	2543619	2538841	280033	275422	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC550.03c	ypa1	SPCC550.03c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.782178926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770128	2543619	2543378	280033	279800	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC3H8.07c	ypa1	pac10	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.565999595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770129	2543619	2538935	280033	275511	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC1682.11c	ypa1	ctl1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPCC1682.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042603937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770130	2543619	2539481	280033	276044	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC622.16c	ypa1	epe1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.908656335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770131	2543619	2539027	280033	275600	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC1322.08	ypa1	srk1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	mkp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.631981271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770132	2543619	2541009	280033	277524	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC428.04	ypa1	apq12	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.628624466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770133	2543619	2542439	280033	278901	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC17A5.08	ypa1	erp2	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.422474758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770134	2543619	2540378	280033	276907	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC30D10.18c	ypa1	rpl102	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	rpl1-2|rpl10a-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.155616352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770135	2543619	2539317	280033	275883	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC16A11.08	ypa1	atg20	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392540476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770136	2543619	2540019	280033	276563	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC1685.01	ypa1	pmp1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.654500798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770137	2543619	2538708	280033	275292	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC594.01	ypa1	SPCC594.01	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPCC736.16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.991317724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770138	2543619	2541142	280033	277657	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC725.04	ypa1	SPBC725.04	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.194051729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770139	2543619	2541464	280033	277966	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC222.08c	ypa1	SPAC222.08c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.608926741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770140	2543619	2540342	280033	276871	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC2G2.01c	ypa1	liz1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.506046125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770141	2543619	2541053	280033	277568	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC56F2.10c	ypa1	alg5	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.487196431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770142	2543619	2540599	280033	277125	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC29A3.10c	ypa1	atp14	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990211628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770143	2543619	2540184	280033	276717	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC106.12c	ypa1	SPBC106.12c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.907710726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770144	2543619	2541296	280033	277808	SPAC4F10.04	SPBP8B7.06	ypa1	rpp201	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.558024366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770145	2543619	2539427	280033	275992	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC663.15c	ypa1	SPCC663.15c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.33877443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770146	2543619	2542060	280033	278538	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC23C11.14	ypa1	zhf1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	zhf	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.90836685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770147	2543619	2538884	280033	275462	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC1393.08	ypa1	SPCC1393.08	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.050809792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770148	2543619	2539421	280033	275986	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC794.11c	ypa1	ent3	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPCC794.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.041396809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770149	2543619	3361105	280033	280181	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC188.10c	ypa1	SPCC188.10c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852465183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770150	2543619	2539213	280033	275783	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC285.10c	ypa1	SPCC285.10c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.011137817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770151	2543619	2542255	280033	278725	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC57A7.08	ypa1	pzh1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.739961885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770152	2543619	2543011	280033	279449	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC10F6.11c	ypa1	atg17	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.93006536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770153	2543619	2540193	280033	276726	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC1289.10c	ypa1	adn2	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517777121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770154	2543619	3361134	280033	280210	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC737.09c	ypa1	hmt1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPCC74.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.449766826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770155	2543619	2542781	280033	279230	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC57A10.12c	ypa1	ura3	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.120872146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770156	2543619	2539519	280033	276081	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC364.05	ypa1	vps3	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.249658172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770157	2543619	2541793	280033	278284	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC22H10.02	ypa1	SPAC22H10.02	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.052940475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770158	2543619	2538848	280033	275429	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC613.12c	ypa1	raf1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.33699078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770159	2543619	2540643	280033	277168	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC19G7.06	ypa1	mbx1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.057882227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770160	2543619	2541144	280033	277659	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC685.06	ypa1	rps001	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.336359522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770161	2543619	2541628	280033	278124	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC110.02	ypa1	pds5	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.133591125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770162	2543619	2542875	280033	279320	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC13G7.02c	ypa1	ssa1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.899272355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770163	2543619	2542725	280033	279176	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC3A12.10	ypa1	rpl2001	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633422605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770164	2543619	2540821	280033	277339	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC800.03	ypa1	clr3	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.468256392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770165	2543619	2539538	280033	276100	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC364.06	ypa1	nap1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.19903646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770166	2543619	2540001	280033	276545	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC1289.13c	ypa1	gmh6	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.095738957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770167	2543619	2541670	280033	278166	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC24H6.13	ypa1	SPAC24H6.13	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.378692147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770168	2543619	2539490	280033	276053	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC364.07	ypa1	ser3	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPCC364.07|SPCC4G3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.982335588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770169	2543619	2539362	280033	275928	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC18B5.10c	ypa1	SPCC18B5.10c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.804528149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770170	2543619	2542286	280033	278754	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC1786.01c	ypa1	ptl2	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPAC1786.01c|SPAC31G5.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.623344106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770171	2543619	2541175	280033	277689	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC839.13c	ypa1	rpl1601	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992355994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770172	2543619	2541909	280033	278399	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC227.01c	ypa1	erd1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.031014557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770173	2543619	2541371	280033	277882	SPAC4F10.04	SPBP4H10.17c	ypa1	SPBP4H10.17c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	mrps2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.683407667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770174	2543619	2542881	280033	279326	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC13F5.03c	ypa1	gld1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.634002107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770175	2543619	2539925	280033	276469	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC16H5.13	ypa1	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.76912744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770176	2543619	2540814	280033	277333	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC4B4.10c	ypa1	atg5	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	mug77	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048658498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770177	2543619	2540800	280033	277319	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC409.20c	ypa1	psh3	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.042602577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770178	2543619	2540152	280033	276688	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC12C2.03c	ypa1	SPBC12C2.03c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.279324953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770179	2543619	2538717	280033	275301	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC1235.02	ypa1	bio2	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPCC320.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.282801313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770180	2543619	2539246	280033	275816	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC18.13	ypa1	SPCC18.13	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.848491575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770181	2543619	2542940	280033	279381	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC31A2.12	ypa1	SPAC31A2.12	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.500986783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770182	2543619	2538714	280033	275298	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC330.11	ypa1	btb1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.684339433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770183	2543619	2541100	280033	277615	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC651.04	ypa1	SPBC651.04	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.455786163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770184	2543619	2543066	280033	279499	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC343.12	ypa1	rds1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.497107634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770185	2543619	2539239	280033	275809	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC1020.10	ypa1	oca2	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.343020689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770186	2543619	2539346	280033	275912	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC569.04	ypa1	SPCC569.04	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.906892797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770187	2543619	2541367	280033	277878	SPAC4F10.04	SPBP8B7.13	ypa1	vac7	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.331904588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770188	2543619	2541531	280033	278031	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC25A8.01c	ypa1	fft3	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.061943137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770189	2543619	2540654	280033	277179	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC19F5.01c	ypa1	puc1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPBP8B7.32c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389784609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770190	2543619	2540699	280033	277223	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC800.08	ypa1	gcd10	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.416272411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770191	2543619	2540829	280033	277347	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC800.09	ypa1	sum2	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449464657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770192	2543619	2540523	280033	277051	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC29A10.10c	ypa1	dbl8	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPBC29A10.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.713737891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770193	2543619	2540164	280033	276699	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC1683.03c	ypa1	SPBC1683.03c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.752400113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770194	2543619	2540677	280033	277202	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC21B10.03c	ypa1	ath1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.628873385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770195	2543619	2542326	280033	278792	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC16C9.07	ypa1	pom2	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPAC2G11.01|mug189|ppk5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.499956888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770196	2543619	2543439	280033	279859	SPAC4F10.04	SPAPB1A10.13	ypa1	SPAPB1A10.13	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.557743919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770197	2543619	2543437	280033	279857	SPAC4F10.04	SPAPB1A10.14	ypa1	pof15	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.497914149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770198	2543619	2542727	280033	279177	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC26A3.02	ypa1	myh1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	myh	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781050384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770199	2543619	2540516	280033	277044	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC21C3.01c	ypa1	vps13a	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506954284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770200	2543619	2539928	280033	276472	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC1604.08c	ypa1	imp1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709992532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770201	2543619	2540333	280033	276863	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC21B10.07	ypa1	SPBC21B10.07	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.156399005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770202	2543619	2539205	280033	275775	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC4B3.15	ypa1	mid1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.802766826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770203	2543619	2539726	280033	276278	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC13E7.08c	ypa1	leo1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPBC13E7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.056489097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770204	2543619	2540380	280033	276909	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC1A4.05	ypa1	blt1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.184733294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770205	2543619	2543525	280033	279943	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC4A8.14	ypa1	SPAC4A8.14	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	prs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.744282835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770206	2543619	5802702	280033	857840	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC1235.15	ypa1	dga1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPCC548.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514893715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770207	2543619	2540551	280033	277078	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC23E6.01c	ypa1	cxr1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.625571719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770208	2543619	2539189	280033	275760	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC1682.16	ypa1	rpt4	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.937326851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770209	2543619	2541084	280033	277599	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC649.02	ypa1	rps1902	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	rps19|rps19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329743965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770210	2543619	2539253	280033	275823	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC1827.03c	ypa1	SPCC1827.03c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.935212707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770211	2543619	3361360	280033	280436	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC1652.01	ypa1	SPBC1652.01	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.506166333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770212	2543619	2539169	280033	275740	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC1235.11	ypa1	mpc1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.99366443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770213	2543619	2541238	280033	277752	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC8E4.05c	ypa1	SPBC8E4.05c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.417733418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770214	2543619	2543220	280033	279648	SPAC4F10.04	SPAPB21F2.02	ypa1	SPAPB21F2.02	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.342912785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770215	2543619	2543400	280033	279822	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC3G9.11c	ypa1	SPAC3G9.11c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.629802098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770216	2543619	2541806	280033	278297	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC4G8.13c	ypa1	prz1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318592451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770217	2543619	2543387	280033	279809	SPAC4F10.04	SPAPB1E7.02c	ypa1	mcl1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.975320225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770218	2543619	2541029	280033	277544	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC409.10	ypa1	ade7	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317279256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770219	2543619	3361517	280033	280593	SPAC4F10.04	SPAP11E10.02c	ypa1	mam3	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPAPB1A10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.984277168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770220	2543619	2540360	280033	276889	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC2G5.01	ypa1	SPBC2G5.01	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.628261587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770221	2543619	2540481	280033	277009	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC2D10.12	ypa1	rhp23	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441774401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770222	2543619	2542424	280033	278886	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC1805.14	ypa1	SPAC1805.14	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.186678123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770223	2543619	2541869	280033	278359	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC22F3.13	ypa1	tsc1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.023358373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770224	2543619	2543374	280033	279796	SPAC4F10.04	SPAPB1A10.08	ypa1	SPAPB1A10.08	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.29737628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770225	2543619	2543090	280033	279523	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC1348.01	ypa1	SPBC1348.01	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.774497954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770226	2543619	2542460	280033	278921	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC1F12.03c	ypa1	SPAC1F12.03c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.059796614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770227	2543619	2540383	280033	276912	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC31E1.02c	ypa1	pmr1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	cps5|pgak2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.970254485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770228	2543619	2540309	280033	276839	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC21B10.13c	ypa1	yox1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.774179655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770229	2543619	2543646	280033	280060	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC821.07c	ypa1	moc3	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.506853916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770230	2543619	2542617	280033	279071	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC13A11.01c	ypa1	rga8	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844526306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770231	2543619	2541062	280033	277577	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC660.11	ypa1	tcg1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.686750941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770232	2543619	2541875	280033	278365	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC22F3.06c	ypa1	lon1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.496254104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770233	2543619	2540787	280033	277306	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC1921.07c	ypa1	sgf29	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.313446284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770234	2543619	2540734	280033	277257	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC19G7.09	ypa1	ulp1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634144701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770235	2539847	2540279	276395	276810	SPBC530.14c	SPBC3B8.04c	dsk1	SPBC3B8.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.447799122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770236	2539847	2542895	276395	279339	SPBC530.14c	SPAC13G6.10c	dsk1	asl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.211246432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770237	2539847	2540060	276395	276598	SPBC530.14c	SPBC106.01	dsk1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.747224762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770238	2539847	2542430	276395	278892	SPBC530.14c	SPAC17G6.06	dsk1	rps2401	-	rps24|rps24-1|rps24a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439869804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770239	2539847	2543617	276395	280031	SPBC530.14c	SPAC4A8.10	dsk1	SPAC4A8.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979136298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770240	2539847	2540913	276395	277429	SPBC530.14c	SPBC56F2.08c	dsk1	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388694238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770241	2539847	2538977	276395	275551	SPBC530.14c	SPCC1020.06c	dsk1	tal1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819173092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770242	2539847	2543064	276395	279497	SPBC530.14c	SPAC3G6.01	dsk1	hrp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.158266207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770243	2539847	2542671	276395	279124	SPBC530.14c	SPAC824.09c	dsk1	SPAC824.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981926904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770244	2539847	2540131	276395	276668	SPBC530.14c	SPBC1778.05c	dsk1	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.263546587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770245	2539847	2543559	276395	279975	SPBC530.14c	SPAC664.04c	dsk1	rps1602	-	rps16|rps16-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.053835392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770246	2539847	2540664	276395	277189	SPBC530.14c	SPBC215.02	dsk1	bob1	-	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.113007326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770247	2539847	2543383	276395	279805	SPBC530.14c	SPAC869.08	dsk1	pcm2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037929207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770248	2539847	2539935	276395	276479	SPBC530.14c	SPBC13G1.04c	dsk1	abh1	-	SPBC13G1.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.376633633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770249	2539847	2539937	276395	276481	SPBC530.14c	SPBC1539.08	dsk1	arf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.078250646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770250	2539847	2542012	276395	278495	SPBC530.14c	SPAC23C11.02c	dsk1	rps23	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.421872024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770251	2539847	2542022	276395	278505	SPBC530.14c	SPAC23A1.03	dsk1	apt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981954579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770252	2539847	2543586	276395	280001	SPBC530.14c	SPAC458.04c	dsk1	dli1	-	dil1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386497383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770253	2539847	2542318	276395	278784	SPBC530.14c	SPAC16C9.05	dsk1	cph1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985971605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770254	2539847	2542277	276395	278746	SPBC530.14c	SPAC17A5.02c	dsk1	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.970778844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770255	2539847	2543641	276395	280055	SPBC530.14c	SPAC3H5.08c	dsk1	SPAC3H5.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.432234808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770256	2539847	2542845	276395	279291	SPBC530.14c	SPAC824.04	dsk1	SPAC824.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.197214149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770257	2539847	2542568	276395	279024	SPBC530.14c	SPAC1952.02	dsk1	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.620211658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770258	2539847	2542896	276395	279340	SPBC530.14c	SPAC3F10.04	dsk1	gsa1	-	gsh2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926968619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770259	2539847	2542964	276395	279404	SPBC530.14c	SPAC12G12.07c	dsk1	SPAC12G12.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382593336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770260	2539847	2541801	276395	278292	SPBC530.14c	SPAC2F7.08c	dsk1	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.948653178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770261	2539847	2542513	276395	278971	SPBC530.14c	SPAC1952.05	dsk1	gcn5	-	kat2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.018860796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770262	2539847	2539845	276395	276393	SPBC530.14c	SPBC12C2.02c	dsk1	ste20	-	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.815764494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770263	2539847	2542249	276395	278719	SPBC530.14c	SPAC30D11.14c	dsk1	SPAC30D11.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.415320446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770264	2539847	2542507	276395	278965	SPBC530.14c	SPAC18G6.13	dsk1	SPAC18G6.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778999053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770265	2539847	2539733	276395	276285	SPBC530.14c	SPBC16E9.12c	dsk1	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.364798783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770266	2539847	2541889	276395	278379	SPBC530.14c	SPAC2F7.03c	dsk1	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.357772076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770267	2539847	2542817	276395	279264	SPBC530.14c	SPAC13G6.02c	dsk1	rps101	-	rps1-1|rps3a-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.116432381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770268	2539847	2541496	276395	277998	SPBC530.14c	SPAC23D3.09	dsk1	arp42	-	arp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.661812575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770269	2539847	2539603	276395	276161	SPBC530.14c	SPBC1289.06c	dsk1	ppr8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.557478317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770270	2539847	2543643	276395	280057	SPBC530.14c	SPAC3G9.07c	dsk1	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.47545347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770271	2539847	2541899	276395	278389	SPBC530.14c	SPAC22E12.11c	dsk1	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.238171458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770272	2539847	3361269	276395	280345	SPBC530.14c	SPBC31A8.01c	dsk1	rtn1	-	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.857307668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770273	2539847	2540961	276395	277477	SPBC530.14c	SPBC36B7.03	dsk1	sec63	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194463168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770274	2539847	2539974	276395	276518	SPBC530.14c	SPBC32H8.07	dsk1	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.982607631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770275	2539847	2541720	276395	278214	SPBC530.14c	SPAC23H3.13c	dsk1	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637929324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770276	2539847	2541241	276395	277755	SPBC530.14c	SPBC887.17	dsk1	SPBC887.17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262459471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770277	2539847	2543378	276395	279800	SPBC530.14c	SPAC3H8.07c	dsk1	pac10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.737091666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770278	2539847	2539481	276395	276044	SPBC530.14c	SPCC622.16c	dsk1	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.735317301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770279	2539847	2542056	276395	278535	SPBC530.14c	SPAC6G9.14	dsk1	SPAC6G9.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851575532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770280	2539847	2540180	276395	276713	SPBC530.14c	SPBC16D10.11c	dsk1	rps1801	-	rps18-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32386741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770281	2539847	2539303	276395	275871	SPBC530.14c	SPCC1020.09	dsk1	gnr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.414480463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770282	2539847	2541266	276395	277780	SPBC530.14c	SPBP16F5.05c	dsk1	yar1	-	SPBP16F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.845127801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770283	2539847	2541614	276395	278111	SPBC530.14c	SPAC29A4.20	dsk1	elp3	-	kat9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.022020041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770284	2539847	2540229	276395	276761	SPBC530.14c	SPBC31F10.15c	dsk1	atp15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.514628316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770285	2539847	2539812	276395	276362	SPBC530.14c	SPBC1347.02	dsk1	fkbp39	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.475386968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770286	2539847	2541378	276395	277889	SPBC530.14c	SPBP8B7.21	dsk1	ubp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.895236629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770287	2539847	3361520	276395	280596	SPBC530.14c	SPAC1610.02c	dsk1	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101919334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770288	2539847	2542869	276395	279314	SPBC530.14c	SPAC140.02	dsk1	gar2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.142985516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770289	2539847	2541144	276395	277659	SPBC530.14c	SPBC685.06	dsk1	rps001	-	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.813823551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770290	2539847	2541628	276395	278124	SPBC530.14c	SPAC110.02	dsk1	pds5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.998654247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770291	2539847	2541713	276395	278208	SPBC530.14c	SPAC3A12.12	dsk1	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.155097786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770292	2539847	2538907	276395	275484	SPBC530.14c	SPCC24B10.19c	dsk1	nts1	-	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.146128703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770293	2539847	2541786	276395	278278	SPBC530.14c	SPAC22F3.08c	dsk1	rok1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.79150624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770294	2539847	2539101	276395	275673	SPBC530.14c	SPCC736.04c	dsk1	gma12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.743001797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770295	2539847	2540619	276395	277145	SPBC530.14c	SPBC25H2.15	dsk1	SPBC25H2.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.943951926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770296	2539847	2543071	276395	279504	SPBC530.14c	SPAC3C7.06c	dsk1	pit1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.886321916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770297	2539847	2542881	276395	279326	SPBC530.14c	SPAC13F5.03c	dsk1	gld1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984159877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770298	2539847	2543304	276395	279728	SPBC530.14c	SPAC6B12.12	dsk1	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.943169656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770299	2539847	2541372	276395	277883	SPBC530.14c	SPBP8B7.28c	dsk1	stc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924985577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770300	2539847	2540531	276395	277059	SPBC530.14c	SPBC23E6.08	dsk1	sat1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.510920173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770301	2539847	2541432	276395	277937	SPBC530.14c	SPAC1F5.05c	dsk1	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201215728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770302	2539847	2540325	276395	276855	SPBC530.14c	SPBC21B10.10	dsk1	rps402	-	rps4-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.820430862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770303	2539847	3361329	276395	280405	SPBC530.14c	SPBC25H2.10c	dsk1	SPBC25H2.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037727143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770304	2539847	2539188	276395	275759	SPBC530.14c	SPCC1827.04	dsk1	vms1	-	SPCC1827.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.694133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770305	2539847	2542826	276395	279273	SPBC530.14c	SPAC13G6.09	dsk1	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.049645837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770306	2539847	2543582	276395	279997	SPBC530.14c	SPAC4H3.06	dsk1	SPAC4H3.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507620195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770307	2539847	2543044	276395	279479	SPBC530.14c	SPAC3C7.12	dsk1	tip1	-	noc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.072733031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770308	2539847	2542442	276395	278904	SPBC530.14c	SPACUNK12.02c	dsk1	cmk1	-	CaMK-I|SPAC25D11.02C	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866166667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770309	2539847	2540146	276395	276683	SPBC530.14c	SPBC17A3.06	dsk1	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.649739908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770310	2539847	2539189	276395	275760	SPBC530.14c	SPCC1682.16	dsk1	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039103281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770311	2539847	2539178	276395	275749	SPBC530.14c	SPCC1682.14	dsk1	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092711535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770312	2539847	2543486	276395	279906	SPBC530.14c	SPAC959.07	dsk1	rps403	-	rps4|rps4-3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.829380821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770313	2539847	2543220	276395	279648	SPBC530.14c	SPAPB21F2.02	dsk1	SPAPB21F2.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094343612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770314	2539847	2541806	276395	278297	SPBC530.14c	SPAC4G8.13c	dsk1	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.743172314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770315	2539847	2543327	276395	279750	SPBC530.14c	SPAC1D4.06c	dsk1	csk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818826363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770316	2539847	2540125	276395	276662	SPBC530.14c	SPBC16C6.01c	dsk1	SPBC16C6.01c	-	SPBC543.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319335263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770317	2539847	2542424	276395	278886	SPBC530.14c	SPAC1805.14	dsk1	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.157015562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770318	2539847	2539085	276395	275657	SPBC530.14c	SPCC285.15c	dsk1	rps2802	-	rps28|rps28-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.916965095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770319	2539847	2543333	276395	279756	SPBC530.14c	SPAC694.02	dsk1	SPAC694.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.456022014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770320	2539847	2542561	276395	279017	SPBC530.14c	SPAC31G5.17c	dsk1	rps1001	-	rps10-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.958206137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770321	2539847	2540649	276395	277174	SPBC530.14c	SPBC19F8.08	dsk1	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.682461938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770322	2541051	2540060	277566	276598	SPBC3E7.08c	SPBC106.01	rad13	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.448860806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770323	2541051	2539028	277566	275601	SPBC3E7.08c	SPCC1281.07c	rad13	SPCC1281.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.80943378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770324	2541051	2543685	277566	280099	SPBC3E7.08c	SPAC3C7.03c	rad13	rad55	-	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.651544072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770325	2541051	2542558	277566	279014	SPBC3E7.08c	SPAC1952.07	rad13	rad1	-	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.622847528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770326	2541051	2542036	277566	278518	SPBC3E7.08c	SPAC23A1.19c	rad13	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.706313552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770327	2541051	2539388	277566	275953	SPBC3E7.08c	SPCC24B10.12	rad13	cgi121	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.56029282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770328	2541051	3361403	277566	280479	SPBC3E7.08c	SPAC27D7.12c	rad13	but1	-	SPAC27D7.12|mug107|prx	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913885513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770329	2541051	2541746	277566	278240	SPBC3E7.08c	SPAC20G4.04c	rad13	hus1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.307969003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770330	2541051	2543009	277566	279447	SPBC3E7.08c	SPAC10F6.06	rad13	vip1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986610043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770331	2541051	2540464	277566	276992	SPBC3E7.08c	SPBC23E6.02	rad13	rrp2	-	SPBC23E6.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452047567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770332	2541051	2541531	277566	278031	SPBC3E7.08c	SPAC25A8.01c	rad13	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.677173784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770333	2541051	2541789	277566	278281	SPBC3E7.08c	SPAC23H4.08	rad13	iwr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.126475077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770334	2541051	2540064	277566	276602	SPBC3E7.08c	SPBC1718.02	rad13	hop1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.437352611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770335	2541051	2542716	277566	279169	SPBC3E7.08c	SPAC25H1.07	rad13	emc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923577944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770336	2541051	2542424	277566	278886	SPBC3E7.08c	SPAC1805.14	rad13	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867127024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770337	2541051	2540736	277566	277259	SPBC3E7.08c	SPBC19F8.02	rad13	SPBC19F8.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323121993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770338	2542767	2542518	279217	278976	SPAC1565.07c	SPAC1B3.16c	knd1	vht1	SPAC1565.07c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.404875015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770339	2542767	2539684	279217	276239	SPAC1565.07c	SPBC16A3.16	knd1	SPBC16A3.16	SPAC1565.07c	cwc27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.329867721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770340	2542767	2542787	279217	279236	SPAC1565.07c	SPAC9G1.08c	knd1	SPAC9G1.08c	SPAC1565.07c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.664792966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770341	2542767	2541621	279217	278118	SPAC1565.07c	SPAC29A4.17c	knd1	SPAC29A4.17c	SPAC1565.07c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.266160514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770342	2542767	2539876	279217	276422	SPAC1565.07c	SPBC1734.07c	knd1	trs8502	SPAC1565.07c	SPBC1734.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.691961955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770343	2542767	2539443	279217	276006	SPAC1565.07c	SPCC736.02	knd1	SPCC736.02	SPAC1565.07c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043383894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770344	2542767	2539463	279217	276026	SPAC1565.07c	SPCC550.11	knd1	SPCC550.11	SPAC1565.07c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.786933845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770345	2542767	2541227	279217	277741	SPAC1565.07c	SPBC947.05c	knd1	frp2	SPAC1565.07c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.969285769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770346	2542767	2539175	279217	275746	SPAC1565.07c	SPCC16C4.01	knd1	sif2	SPAC1565.07c	SPCC5E4.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.200137476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770347	2542767	2542991	279217	279429	SPAC1565.07c	SPAC11D3.05	knd1	mfs2	SPAC1565.07c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152843197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770348	2542767	2543551	279217	279968	SPAC1565.07c	SPAC4G8.06c	knd1	trm12	SPAC1565.07c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.74718422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770349	2542767	2538698	279217	275283	SPAC1565.07c	SPCC1442.02	knd1	SPCC1442.02	SPAC1565.07c	SPCC1450.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.908415333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770350	2542767	2542082	279217	278559	SPAC1565.07c	SPAC29B12.10c	knd1	pgt1	SPAC1565.07c	opt1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.31998738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770351	2542767	2543319	279217	279743	SPAC1565.07c	SPAC6B12.09	knd1	trm10	SPAC1565.07c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036724895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770352	2542767	2539003	279217	275577	SPAC1565.07c	SPCC1442.17c	knd1	ist1	SPAC1565.07c	SPCC285.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.142138861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770353	2542767	2542646	279217	279100	SPAC1565.07c	SPAC11H11.05c	knd1	fta6	SPAC1565.07c	sma6	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383538272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770354	2542767	2541776	279217	278270	SPAC1565.07c	SPAC23H3.05c	knd1	swd1	SPAC1565.07c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.161689049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770355	2542767	2540987	279217	277503	SPAC1565.07c	SPBC36B7.05c	knd1	SPBC36B7.05c	SPAC1565.07c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981330935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770356	2542767	2539603	279217	276161	SPAC1565.07c	SPBC1289.06c	knd1	ppr8	SPAC1565.07c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.671811971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770357	2542767	3361455	279217	280531	SPAC1565.07c	SPAC1782.01	knd1	ecm29	SPAC1565.07c	SPAPYUG7.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.804135447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770358	2542767	2539667	279217	276222	SPAC1565.07c	SPBC13G1.08c	knd1	ash2	SPAC1565.07c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.903656475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770359	2542767	2543244	279217	279672	SPAC1565.07c	SPAC6B12.06c	knd1	rrg9	SPAC1565.07c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.502948167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770360	2542767	2540751	279217	277273	SPAC1565.07c	SPBC20F10.10	knd1	psl1	SPAC1565.07c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.495352696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770361	2542767	2540318	279217	276848	SPAC1565.07c	SPBC30B4.04c	knd1	sol1	SPAC1565.07c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923609321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770362	2542767	2542010	279217	278493	SPAC1565.07c	SPAC20H4.05c	knd1	SPAC20H4.05c	SPAC1565.07c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.616864639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770363	2542767	2540990	279217	277506	SPAC1565.07c	SPBC36B7.06c	knd1	mug20	SPAC1565.07c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095625786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770364	2542767	2543119	279217	279551	SPAC1565.07c	SPAC3A11.07	knd1	nde2	SPAC1565.07c	SPAC3A11.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.515510767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770365	2542767	2542597	279217	279051	SPAC1565.07c	SPAP8A3.07c	knd1	SPAP8A3.07c	SPAC1565.07c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196632459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770366	2542767	2541488	279217	277990	SPAC1565.07c	SPAC227.17c	knd1	SPAC227.17c	SPAC1565.07c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.558472809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770367	2542767	2540193	279217	276726	SPAC1565.07c	SPBC1289.10c	knd1	adn2	SPAC1565.07c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928067536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770368	2542767	2540460	279217	276988	SPAC1565.07c	SPBC2A9.07c	knd1	hpz1	SPAC1565.07c	SPBC2A9.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.941678072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770369	2542767	2538762	279217	275345	SPAC1565.07c	SPCC306.04c	knd1	set1	SPAC1565.07c	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.356018967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770370	2542767	2539362	279217	275928	SPAC1565.07c	SPCC18B5.10c	knd1	SPCC18B5.10c	SPAC1565.07c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.851454338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770371	2542767	2543567	279217	279983	SPAC1565.07c	SPAC890.03	knd1	ppk16	SPAC1565.07c	mug92	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.478917182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770372	2542767	2542401	279217	278865	SPAC1565.07c	SPAC1142.02c	knd1	SPAC1142.02c	SPAC1565.07c	SPAC17G6.19c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.509666651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770373	2542767	2543304	279217	279728	SPAC1565.07c	SPAC6B12.12	knd1	tom70	SPAC1565.07c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.539492856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770374	2542767	2542306	279217	278773	SPAC1565.07c	SPAC29A4.11	knd1	rga3	SPAC1565.07c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.19084113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770375	2542767	2540891	279217	277407	SPAC1565.07c	SPBC582.08	knd1	SPBC582.08	SPAC1565.07c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.259614623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770376	2542767	2543633	279217	280047	SPAC1565.07c	SPAC3H8.05c	knd1	mms1	SPAC1565.07c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.966817775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770377	2542767	2539928	279217	276472	SPAC1565.07c	SPBC1604.08c	knd1	imp1	SPAC1565.07c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865348332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770378	2542767	2542104	279217	278580	SPAC1565.07c	SPAC869.02c	knd1	SPAC869.02c	SPAC1565.07c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931099046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770379	2542767	2540167	279217	276702	SPAC1565.07c	SPBC1683.04	knd1	SPBC1683.04	SPAC1565.07c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.43574929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770380	2542767	2542680	279217	279133	SPAC1565.07c	SPAC26F1.09	knd1	gyp51	SPAC1565.07c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.33054816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770381	2542555	2540556	279012	277083	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC19F8.04c	SPAC1952.06c	lcl3	-	SPBC19F8.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.492043548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770382	2542555	2538721	279012	275305	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC1494.10	SPAC1952.06c	adn3	-	SPCC70.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.330666847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770383	2542555	3361499	279012	280575	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC25H1.09	SPAC1952.06c	mde5	-	SPAC4A8.01|meu30	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.589342355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770384	2542555	2543635	279012	280049	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC3H8.03	SPAC1952.06c	img2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.764360346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770385	2542555	2539566	279012	276126	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC736.13	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC736.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.845494638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770386	2542555	2539430	279012	275994	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC417.12	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC417.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.81753353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770387	2542555	2539452	279012	276015	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC70.03c	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC70.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.695282704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770388	2542555	2542066	279012	278543	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC227.05	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC227.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.612618899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770389	2542555	2539940	279012	276484	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC16A3.10	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC16A3.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097152392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770390	2542555	2539749	279012	276301	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC16A3.13	SPAC1952.06c	meu7	-	aah4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.414614315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770391	2542555	2539167	279012	275738	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC1281.08	SPAC1952.06c	wtf11	-	meu24	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.949997985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770392	2542555	2542706	279012	279159	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC29B12.13	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC29B12.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443739872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770393	2542555	2540653	279012	277178	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC215.07c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC215.07c	-	pdp2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.414023788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770394	2542555	2541032	279012	277547	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC3H7.11	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC3H7.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.921266981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770395	2542555	2539282	279012	275850	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC622.06c	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC622.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.44232256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770396	2542555	2538985	279012	275559	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC13B11.03c	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC13B11.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.616276162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770397	2542555	2540198	279012	276731	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC1709.04c	SPAC1952.06c	cyp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.844282529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770398	2542555	2539202	279012	275773	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC162.10	SPAC1952.06c	ppk33	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981640525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770399	2542555	2538929	279012	275505	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC162.02c	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC162.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.619172779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770400	2542555	2541002	279012	277517	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC3E7.07c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC3E7.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.663681294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770401	2542555	2543376	279012	279798	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC3H1.06c	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC3H1.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924959347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770402	2542555	2543594	279012	280009	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC8F11.05c	SPAC1952.06c	mug130	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.025406967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770403	2542555	2539196	279012	275767	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC1795.03	SPAC1952.06c	gms1	-	gmn3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.203080303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770404	2542555	2543572	279012	279987	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC4G8.04	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC4G8.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101288828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770405	2542555	2540168	279012	276703	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC1683.06c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC1683.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.025944043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770406	2542555	2539800	279012	276350	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC1347.13c	SPAC1952.06c	mrm1	-	SPBC1347.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.568664935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770407	2542555	2543103	279012	279535	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC3F10.09	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC3F10.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.671127904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770408	2542555	2542040	279012	278521	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC212.01c	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC212.01c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044966942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770409	2542555	2543320	279012	279744	SPAC1952.06c	SPAPJ695.01c	SPAC1952.06c	SPAPJ695.01c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932998764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770410	2542555	2541361	279012	277872	SPAC1952.06c	SPBP8B7.10c	SPAC1952.06c	utp16	-	SPBP8B7.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.206556371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770411	2542555	2541316	279012	277828	SPAC1952.06c	SPBP19A11.02c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBP19A11.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986398962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770412	2542555	2541235	279012	277749	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC8D2.12c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC8D2.12c	-	pI053	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6178324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770413	2542555	2539226	279012	275796	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC16C4.20c	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.379659121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770414	2542555	2541795	279012	278286	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC2E1P3.02c	SPAC1952.06c	amt3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.286257773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770415	2542555	2540015	279012	276559	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC1685.02c	SPAC1952.06c	rps1202	-	rps12-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92386489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770416	2542555	2542468	279012	278929	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC1D4.09c	SPAC1952.06c	rtf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.139758686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770417	2542555	2541208	279012	277722	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC887.04c	SPAC1952.06c	lub1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.240881496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770418	2542555	2541205	279012	277719	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC839.02	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC839.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.071439855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770419	2542555	2541313	279012	277825	SPAC1952.06c	SPBP26C9.02c	SPAC1952.06c	car1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.763989274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770420	2542555	2539443	279012	276006	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC736.02	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC736.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.560435581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770421	2542555	2541471	279012	277973	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC1F5.03c	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC1F5.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.02907164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770422	2542555	2541092	279012	277607	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC660.12c	SPAC1952.06c	egt2	-	SPBC660.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980404672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770423	2542555	2540251	279012	276783	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC336.05c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC336.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.07459534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770424	2542555	2543579	279012	279994	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC9.11	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC9.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195347809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770425	2542555	2538814	279012	275395	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC777.17c	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC777.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.711471889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770426	2542555	2541682	279012	278178	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC15F9.02	SPAC1952.06c	seh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.979041553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770427	2542555	2541285	279012	277798	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC9B6.09c	SPAC1952.06c	mdl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03908116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770428	2542555	2543260	279012	279688	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC1002.17c	SPAC1952.06c	urg2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987282118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770429	2542555	2542156	279012	278632	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC57A7.07c	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC57A7.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.33882347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770430	2542555	2542299	279012	278766	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC18B11.10	SPAC1952.06c	tup11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870870713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770431	2542555	2538801	279012	275382	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC285.13c	SPAC1952.06c	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.053099752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770432	2542555	2540945	279012	277461	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC342.06c	SPAC1952.06c	rtt109	-	kat11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.943075584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770433	2542555	2542848	279012	279294	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC9G1.03c	SPAC1952.06c	rpl3001	-	rpl30|rpl30-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.954331447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770434	2542555	2540417	279012	276945	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC21C3.06	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC21C3.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.566458551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770435	2542555	2538735	279012	275319	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC70.10	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC70.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.927133198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770436	2542555	2540160	279012	276695	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC1773.17c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC1773.17c	-	SPBP26C9.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866071306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770437	2542555	2541811	279012	278302	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC22A12.16	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC22A12.16	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873027356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770438	2542555	2543547	279012	279964	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC926.02	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC926.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.916701057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770439	2542555	2542567	279012	279023	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC328.05	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC328.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.541932083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770440	2542555	2538825	279012	275406	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC757.12	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC757.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.635776124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770441	2542555	2539988	279012	276532	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC1271.05c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC1271.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.972842298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770442	2542555	2541560	279012	278059	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC24B11.12c	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC24B11.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.155037137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770443	2542555	2543609	279012	280023	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC630.05	SPAC1952.06c	gyp7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195546803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770444	2542555	2541960	279012	278447	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC6G9.15c	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC6G9.15c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.612688796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770445	2542555	2540830	279012	277348	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC18H10.16	SPAC1952.06c	can1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.271234275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770446	2542555	2540595	279012	277121	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC21C3.02c	SPAC1952.06c	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.286087732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770447	2542555	2543326	279012	279749	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC56F8.12	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC56F8.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.286093823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770448	2542555	2542649	279012	279103	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC24C9.14	SPAC1952.06c	otu1	-	mug141	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876384281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770449	2542555	2541311	279012	277823	SPAC1952.06c	SPBP8B7.09c	SPAC1952.06c	los1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866439606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770450	2542555	2539961	279012	276505	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC1198.09	SPAC1952.06c	ubc16	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09225863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770451	2542555	3361316	279012	280392	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC2D10.03c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC2D10.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.645601805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770452	2542555	2538969	279012	275543	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC1840.12	SPAC1952.06c	opt3	-	SPCC1840.12|SPCC965.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.688792554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770453	2542555	2540714	279012	277237	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC19C2.04c	SPAC1952.06c	ubp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932078562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770454	2542555	2541905	279012	278395	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC6G9.01c	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC6G9.01c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092955265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770455	2542555	2541416	279012	277923	SPAC1952.06c	SPBCPT2R1.01c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBCPT2R1.01c	-	SPBPB2B2.20c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.129390197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770456	2542555	2539100	279012	275672	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC330.12c	SPAC1952.06c	sdh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.058321222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770457	2542555	2541663	279012	278159	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC22G7.08	SPAC1952.06c	ppk8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.511214666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770458	2542555	2539092	279012	275664	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC1259.08	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC1259.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094892976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770459	2542555	2539478	279012	276041	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC550.07	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC550.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.049133711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770460	2542555	2540359	279012	276888	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC30D10.14	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC30D10.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148764466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770461	2542555	2541683	279012	278179	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC22G7.03	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC22G7.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.10178658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770462	2542555	2539448	279012	276011	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC825.04c	SPAC1952.06c	naa40	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.514634998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770463	2542555	2541246	279012	277760	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC8E4.02c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC8E4.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.45578473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770464	2542555	2539023	279012	275596	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC594.05c	SPAC1952.06c	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.752314141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770465	2542555	2541384	279012	277895	SPAC1952.06c	SPBP8B7.26	SPAC1952.06c	SPBP8B7.26	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.971913592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770466	2542555	2541379	279012	277890	SPAC1952.06c	SPBP8B7.27	SPAC1952.06c	mug30	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.943610555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770467	2542555	2541700	279012	278196	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC32A11.02c	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC32A11.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.275321936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770468	2542555	2539003	279012	275577	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC1442.17c	SPAC1952.06c	ist1	-	SPCC285.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981552399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770469	2542555	2538751	279012	275334	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC1442.07c	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC1442.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.225069037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770470	2542555	2541042	279012	277557	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC359.03c	SPAC1952.06c	aat1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.842000297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770471	2542555	2543102	279012	279534	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC31G5.21	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC31G5.21	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.270496362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770472	2542555	2543461	279012	279881	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC521.03	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC521.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.691415237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770473	2542555	2543511	279012	279929	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC4G9.19	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC4G9.19	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.873660895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770474	2542555	2541776	279012	278270	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC1952.06c	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.563710013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770475	2542555	2541784	279012	278277	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC2E1P3.01	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC2E1P3.01	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.559297697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770476	2542555	2543598	279012	280013	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC4G9.14	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC4G9.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98735321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770477	2542555	2543385	279012	279807	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC4G9.12	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC4G9.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09105863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770478	2542555	2541982	279012	278467	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC23A1.06c	SPAC1952.06c	cmk2	-	mkp2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.850424059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770479	2542555	2540647	279012	277172	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC18H10.07	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC18H10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443006582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770480	2542555	2540041	279012	276580	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC1198.03c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC1198.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.620988562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770481	2542555	2538811	279012	275392	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC330.03c	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC330.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.842457198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770482	2542555	2542990	279012	279428	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC11D3.16c	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC11D3.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153259539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770483	2542555	2539984	279012	276528	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC1289.11	SPAC1952.06c	spf38	-	cwf17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.826066303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770484	2542555	2542507	279012	278965	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC18G6.13	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC18G6.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979198522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770485	2542555	2540987	279012	277503	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC36B7.05c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC36B7.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.330543276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770486	2542555	2538789	279012	275370	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC338.04	SPAC1952.06c	cid2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.769685373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770487	2542555	2539733	279012	276285	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC1952.06c	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.535845185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770488	2542555	2542971	279012	279410	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC105.02c	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC105.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.456951395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770489	2542555	2542464	279012	278925	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC1A6.09c	SPAC1952.06c	lag1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.338093283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770490	2542555	2539898	279012	276444	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC12D12.07c	SPAC1952.06c	trx2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.921535965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770491	2542555	2540400	279012	276928	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC28F2.02	SPAC1952.06c	mep33	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.564978892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770492	2542555	2540543	279012	277070	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC29A10.06c	SPAC1952.06c	ely5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.258632979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770493	2542555	2542297	279012	278764	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC17H9.06c	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC17H9.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.129641518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770494	2542555	2541701	279012	278197	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC1296.03c	SPAC1952.06c	sxa2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.592180897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770495	2542555	2539454	279012	276017	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC622.15c	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC622.15c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.811654979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770496	2542555	2543358	279012	279780	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC688.10	SPAC1952.06c	rev3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.302824196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770497	2542555	2538871	279012	275450	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC1259.14c	SPAC1952.06c	meu27	-	B8647-6	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.381258199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770498	2542555	2541352	279012	277863	SPAC1952.06c	SPBPJ4664.03	SPAC1952.06c	mfm3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873493841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770499	2542555	2540452	279012	276980	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC2A9.11c	SPAC1952.06c	iss9	-	SPBC2A9.11c|SPBC2D10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778629757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770500	2542555	2539586	279012	276145	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC70.08c	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC70.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.437296651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770501	2542555	2540231	279012	276763	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC336.14c	SPAC1952.06c	ppk26	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.144216573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770502	2542555	2539111	279012	275683	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC417.11c	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC417.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.23136954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770503	2542555	2540350	279012	276879	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC317.01	SPAC1952.06c	mbx2	-	pvg4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.714783778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770504	2542555	2542526	279012	278984	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC57A7.13	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC57A7.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.770796531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770505	2542555	2539667	279012	276222	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC1952.06c	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3718831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770506	2542555	2539000	279012	275574	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC1450.06c	SPAC1952.06c	grx3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.825415455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770507	2542555	2540194	279012	276727	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC1709.09	SPAC1952.06c	rrf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819599156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770508	2542555	2542014	279012	278497	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC20H4.04	SPAC1952.06c	fml2	-	mfh2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.27853877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770509	2542555	2538970	279012	275544	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC306.10	SPAC1952.06c	wtf8	-	wtf3-pseudo	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.744841284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770510	2542555	2543389	279012	279811	SPAC1952.06c	SPAPB1A11.02	SPAC1952.06c	SPAPB1A11.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262588346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770511	2542555	2540265	279012	276796	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC3E7.12c	SPAC1952.06c	cfh4	-	chr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817397352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770512	2542555	2538945	279012	275519	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC1739.06c	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC1739.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.337015396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770513	2542555	2541326	279012	277838	SPAC1952.06c	SPBP35G2.03c	SPAC1952.06c	sgo1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.589935966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770514	2542555	2542740	279012	279190	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC9G1.06c	SPAC1952.06c	cyk3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046585378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770515	2542555	2539815	279012	276365	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC1105.02c	SPAC1952.06c	lys4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390957864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770516	2542555	2540675	279012	277200	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC21H7.07c	SPAC1952.06c	his5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.516683599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770517	2542555	2540943	279012	277459	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC36B7.02	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC36B7.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.492931652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770518	2542555	2539217	279012	275787	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC1223.03c	SPAC1952.06c	gut2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.021882303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770519	2542555	2540224	279012	276757	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC32H8.06	SPAC1952.06c	mug93	-	pi018|SPACTOKYO_453.18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.535672182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770520	2542555	2542315	279012	278781	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC16C9.01c	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC16C9.01c	-	SPAC4G8.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094831124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770521	2542555	2542498	279012	278957	SPAC1952.06c	SPACUNK4.16c	SPAC1952.06c	SPACUNK4.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.914169857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770522	2542555	2543392	279012	279814	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC8F11.03	SPAC1952.06c	msh3	-	swi4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.123877249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770523	2542555	2538935	279012	275511	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC1682.11c	SPAC1952.06c	ctl1	-	SPCC1682.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809836368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770524	2542555	2541900	279012	278390	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC1952.06c	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.538215202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770525	2542555	2543311	279012	279735	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC977.15	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC977.15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.926021012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770526	2542555	2541366	279012	277877	SPAC1952.06c	SPBP4H10.12	SPAC1952.06c	SPBP4H10.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.903977946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770527	2542555	2543522	279012	279940	SPAC1952.06c	SPAPB24D3.08c	SPAC1952.06c	SPAPB24D3.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4663911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770528	2542555	2542919	279012	279360	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC6C3.08	SPAC1952.06c	nas6	-	SPAC6C3.08	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.383546301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770529	2542555	2543119	279012	279551	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC3A11.07	SPAC1952.06c	nde2	-	SPAC3A11.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874096266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770530	2542555	2541389	279012	277900	SPAC1952.06c	SPBPB2B2.09c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBPB2B2.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.994368248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770531	2542555	2541259	279012	277773	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC8D2.16c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC8D2.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.222923299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770532	2542555	3361262	279012	280338	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC691.01	SPAC1952.06c	pfa5	-	pi035	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.594620099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770533	2542555	2543381	279012	279803	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC630.09c	SPAC1952.06c	mug58	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.09846095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770534	2542555	2539363	279012	275929	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC613.02	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC613.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.954347023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770535	2542555	2541283	279012	277796	SPAC1952.06c	SPBP8B7.02	SPAC1952.06c	rng9	-	SPBP8B7.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.95939863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770536	2542555	2541266	279012	277780	SPAC1952.06c	SPBP16F5.05c	SPAC1952.06c	yar1	-	SPBP16F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932410959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770537	2542555	2539344	279012	275910	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC1672.09	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC1672.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.976124891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770538	2542555	2543390	279012	279812	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC631.01c	SPAC1952.06c	acp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.266259913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770539	2542555	2540533	279012	277061	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC29A10.16c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038161123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770540	2542555	2539066	279012	275638	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC126.13c	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC126.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.993492119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770541	2542555	2539113	279012	275685	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC1919.11	SPAC1952.06c	mug137	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992774936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770542	2542555	2540193	279012	276726	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC1289.10c	SPAC1952.06c	adn2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.69678652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770543	2542555	2540005	279012	276549	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC1347.09	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC1347.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090673437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770544	2542555	2540691	279012	277216	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC20F10.05	SPAC1952.06c	nrl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.66182748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770545	2542555	2541793	279012	278284	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC22H10.02	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC22H10.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048681984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770546	2542555	2538848	279012	275429	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC613.12c	SPAC1952.06c	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.304577809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770547	2542555	2543493	279012	279913	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC4G8.08	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC4G8.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.489058531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770548	2542555	2542875	279012	279320	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC13G7.02c	SPAC1952.06c	ssa1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.06403756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770549	2542555	2541713	279012	278208	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC1952.06c	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.512473244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770550	2542555	2539908	279012	276454	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC13E7.06	SPAC1952.06c	msd1	-	mug172	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.844940601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770551	2542555	2542170	279012	278645	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC1952.06c	mst2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.893570557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770552	2542555	2541670	279012	278166	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC24H6.13	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC24H6.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.33289044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770553	2542555	2540916	279012	277432	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC354.15	SPAC1952.06c	fap1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.970201842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770554	2542555	2540959	279012	277475	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC365.12c	SPAC1952.06c	ish1	-	isp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.875859055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770555	2542555	2540701	279012	277225	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC19C7.08c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC19C7.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.76779661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770556	2542555	2543398	279012	279820	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC4A8.02c	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC4A8.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093706325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770557	2542555	2540862	279012	277379	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC4C3.06	SPAC1952.06c	syp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148238993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770558	2542555	2538762	279012	275345	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC306.04c	SPAC1952.06c	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.934867754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770559	2542555	2539362	279012	275928	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC18B5.10c	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC18B5.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.639109598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770560	2542555	2540809	279012	277328	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC18A7.01	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC18A7.01	-	SPBC4F6.19c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984370836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770561	2542555	2540242	279012	276774	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC32F12.07c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC32F12.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989195978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770562	2542555	2541175	279012	277689	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC839.13c	SPAC1952.06c	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.121878018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770563	2542555	2543670	279012	280084	SPAC1952.06c	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPAC1952.06c	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807734713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770564	2542555	2541371	279012	277882	SPAC1952.06c	SPBP4H10.17c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBP4H10.17c	-	mrps2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981831898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770565	2542555	2540044	279012	276582	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC1778.04	SPAC1952.06c	spo6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.928458159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770566	2542555	2539030	279012	275603	SPAC1952.06c	SPCP1E11.02	SPAC1952.06c	ppk38	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.875283432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770567	2542555	2543304	279012	279728	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1952.06c	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.609389756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770568	2542555	2539296	279012	275864	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC1235.03	SPAC1952.06c	cue2	-	SPCC1235.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.28056116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770569	2542555	2540600	279012	277126	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC4.05	SPAC1952.06c	mlo2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.89490038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770570	2542555	2541103	279012	277618	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC651.06	SPAC1952.06c	mug166	-	csa1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871790302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770571	2542555	2541376	279012	277887	SPAC1952.06c	SPBP8B7.04	SPAC1952.06c	mug45	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813133246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770572	2542555	2543662	279012	280076	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC9.07c	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC9.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877306673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770573	2542555	2538779	279012	275360	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC569.07	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC569.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.641070828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770574	2542555	2539471	279012	276034	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC576.14	SPAC1952.06c	dph5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.022189645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770575	2542555	2541948	279012	278435	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC222.13c	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC222.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09912525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770576	2542555	2541114	279012	277629	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC582.09	SPAC1952.06c	pex11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.388967951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770577	2542555	2540891	279012	277407	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC582.08	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC582.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.20277731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770578	2542555	2538916	279012	275493	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC16C4.17	SPAC1952.06c	mug123	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986977079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770579	2542555	2539635	279012	276191	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC17D11.03c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC17D11.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.202567545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770580	2542555	2542326	279012	278792	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC16C9.07	SPAC1952.06c	pom2	-	SPAC2G11.01|mug189|ppk5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.185668149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770581	2542555	2541036	279012	277551	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC3H7.05c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC3H7.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.512503136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770582	2542555	2542222	279012	278695	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC1952.06c	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.968228721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770583	2542555	2543228	279012	279656	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC6B12.04c	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC6B12.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.946808416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770584	2542555	2539188	279012	275759	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC1827.04	SPAC1952.06c	vms1	-	SPCC1827.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933229342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770585	2542555	2539182	279012	275753	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC16A11.16c	SPAC1952.06c	rpn1302	-	rpn13|rpn13b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094375624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770586	2542555	2542878	279012	279323	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC57A10.09c	SPAC1952.06c	nhp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.356614634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770587	2542555	2540182	279012	276715	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC16G5.06	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC16G5.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.285448817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770588	2542555	2540297	279012	276828	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC24C6.08c	SPAC1952.06c	bhd1	-	bhd	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.66162447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770589	2542555	2542628	279012	279082	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC24H6.06	SPAC1952.06c	sld3	-	mug175	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982111586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770590	2542555	2540267	279012	276798	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC32C12.03c	SPAC1952.06c	ppk25	-	kin2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926325812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770591	2542555	2543183	279012	279612	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC3A12.06c	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC3A12.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811233688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770592	2542555	2540245	279012	276777	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC31F10.17c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC31F10.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.764063283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770593	2542555	2540927	279012	277443	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC365.06	SPAC1952.06c	pmt3	-	smt3|ubl2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818270308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770594	2542555	3361476	279012	280552	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC16A10.04	SPAC1952.06c	rho4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.741702082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770595	2542555	2538694	279012	275279	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC191.09c	SPAC1952.06c	gst1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.252840066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770596	2542555	2540422	279012	276950	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC27.08c	SPAC1952.06c	sua1	-	SPBC28F2.01c|asp1|met3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869447772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770597	2542555	2541356	279012	277867	SPAC1952.06c	SPBP35G2.12	SPAC1952.06c	SPBP35G2.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.335069585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770598	2542555	2540489	279012	277017	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC25H2.03	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC25H2.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935056471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770599	2542555	2543019	279012	279455	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC57A10.03	SPAC1952.06c	cyp1	-	cyp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.327780628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770600	2542555	2539460	279012	276023	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC4B3.13	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC4B3.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.816244545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770601	2542555	2540667	279012	277192	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC211.06	SPAC1952.06c	gfh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196048476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770602	2542555	2543124	279012	279556	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC3A11.06	SPAC1952.06c	mvp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.765528038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770603	2542555	2543569	279012	279984	SPAC1952.06c	SPAPB24D3.03	SPAC1952.06c	SPAPB24D3.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.407993127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770604	2542555	2542186	279012	278661	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC17C9.14	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC17C9.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.978916236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770605	2542555	2540270	279012	276801	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC2G2.02	SPAC1952.06c	syj1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.84835414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770606	2542555	2542244	279012	278714	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC19G12.13c	SPAC1952.06c	poz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815975587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770607	2542555	2541528	279012	278028	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC24B11.14	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC24B11.14	-	SPAC806.10	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.925258825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770608	2542555	2542021	279012	278504	SPAC1952.06c	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC1952.06c	tos4	-	SPAP14E8.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869590989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770609	2542555	2540808	279012	277327	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC418.02	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC418.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145862284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770610	2542555	2539810	279012	276360	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC1271.07c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC1271.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982029696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770611	2542555	2539253	279012	275823	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC1827.03c	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC1827.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87168551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770612	2542555	2541539	279012	278039	SPAC1952.06c	SPAP27G11.12	SPAC1952.06c	SPAP27G11.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.332599744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770613	2542555	2539037	279012	275610	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC330.07c	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC330.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.414479661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770614	2542555	3361410	279012	280486	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC1527.01	SPAC1952.06c	mok11	-	SPAC23D3.15	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.512535515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770615	2542555	2543513	279012	279931	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC821.06	SPAC1952.06c	spn2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.56091047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770616	2542555	2541709	279012	278204	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC3C7.02c	SPAC1952.06c	pil2	-	SPAC3C7.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.216969711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770617	2542555	2541806	279012	278297	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC1952.06c	prz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.49947144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770618	2542555	3361481	279012	280557	SPAC1952.06c	SPAPB24D3.05c	SPAC1952.06c	SPAPB24D3.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.766027597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770619	2542555	2539875	279012	276421	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC16A3.12c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC16A3.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.274622639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770620	2542555	2543387	279012	279809	SPAC1952.06c	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC1952.06c	mcl1	-	slr3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201602415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770621	2542555	2542995	279012	279433	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC105.01c	SPAC1952.06c	kha1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.235452866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770622	2542555	2542886	279012	279331	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC1486.01	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC1486.01	-	sod2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.198807548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770623	2542555	2540451	279012	276979	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC2G2.17c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC2G2.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.313991699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770624	2542555	2541472	279012	277974	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC589.11	SPAC1952.06c	pth4	-	mug82	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.456787445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770625	2542555	2539531	279012	276093	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC576.02	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC576.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.824381389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770626	2542555	2540561	279012	277088	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC28F2.05c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC28F2.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199127679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770627	2542555	2540314	279012	276844	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC2G5.03	SPAC1952.06c	ctu1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040108253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770628	2542555	2539583	279012	276142	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC777.04	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC777.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.226135481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770629	2542555	2541334	279012	277845	SPAC1952.06c	SPBP4H10.18c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBP4H10.18c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875632346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770630	2542555	2541502	279012	278004	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC23D3.04c	SPAC1952.06c	gpd2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.817973985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770631	2542555	2541808	279012	278299	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC22A12.14c	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC22A12.14c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818970691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770632	2542555	2543151	279012	279583	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC343.06c	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC343.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.102179919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770633	2542555	2543374	279012	279796	SPAC1952.06c	SPAPB1A10.08	SPAC1952.06c	SPAPB1A10.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.614673668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770634	2542555	2540167	279012	276702	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC1683.04	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC1683.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097885384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770635	2542555	2542111	279012	278587	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC1687.14c	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC1687.14c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.303981825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770636	2542555	2540372	279012	276901	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC31F10.03	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC31F10.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.951919127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770637	2542555	2542280	279012	278748	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC1A6.06c	SPAC1952.06c	meu31	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.62100655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770638	2542555	2543448	279012	279868	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC3H5.07	SPAC1952.06c	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809940278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770639	2542555	2540859	279012	277376	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC4C3.09	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC4C3.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.328939198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770640	2542555	2540309	279012	276839	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC21B10.13c	SPAC1952.06c	yox1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873473007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770641	2542555	2539211	279012	275781	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC1739.08c	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC1739.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.231852652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770642	2542555	2541124	279012	277639	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC646.02	SPAC1952.06c	cwf11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.163599913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770643	2542555	2542943	279012	279384	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC1348.03	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.055547976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770644	2542555	2538822	279012	275403	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC1840.02c	SPAC1952.06c	bgs4	-	cwg1|orb11|pbr1|sph1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.082777574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770645	2542555	2540208	279012	276741	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC9B6.03	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC9B6.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.92198407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770646	2542555	2543501	279012	279919	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC664.14	SPAC1952.06c	amt2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043757394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770647	2542555	2541228	279012	277742	SPAC1952.06c	SPBP16F5.08c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBP16F5.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.459025694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770648	2542555	2541236	279012	277750	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC887.11	SPAC1952.06c	pus2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.745862501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770649	2542555	2543463	279012	279883	SPAC1952.06c	SPAPB21F2.03	SPAC1952.06c	slx9	-	SPAPB21F2.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.848325659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770650	2542555	2541875	279012	278365	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC22F3.06c	SPAC1952.06c	lon1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.721627011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770651	2542555	2540811	279012	277330	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC19C7.05	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC19C7.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808942027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770652	2542555	2540787	279012	277306	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC1952.06c	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.360466169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770653	2542555	2540798	279012	277317	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC19C7.01	SPAC1952.06c	mni1	-	SPBC32F12.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.912711472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770654	2542555	2542571	279012	279027	SPAC1952.06c	SPAC589.02c	SPAC1952.06c	med13	-	spTrap240|srb9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.927441567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770655	2542555	2540736	279012	277259	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC19F8.02	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC19F8.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.337415965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770656	2539206	2538896	275776	275474	SPCC24B10.07	SPCC584.11c	gad8	SPCC584.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.055210081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770657	2539206	2540797	275776	277316	SPCC24B10.07	SPBC18H10.11c	gad8	ppr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.341255302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770658	2539206	2541801	275776	278292	SPCC24B10.07	SPAC2F7.08c	gad8	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.836461753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770659	2539206	2542857	275776	279303	SPCC24B10.07	SPAC144.06	gad8	apl5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.263025698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770660	2539206	2540990	275776	277506	SPCC24B10.07	SPBC36B7.06c	gad8	mug20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036535675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770661	2539206	2541694	275776	278190	SPCC24B10.07	SPAC1071.04c	gad8	spc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810369537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770662	2539206	2543437	275776	279857	SPCC24B10.07	SPAPB1A10.14	gad8	pof15	-	SPAPB1A10.14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.826773912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770663	2539206	2541675	275776	278171	SPCC24B10.07	SPAC22F8.12c	gad8	shf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930507922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770664	2539206	2541709	275776	278204	SPCC24B10.07	SPAC3C7.02c	gad8	pil2	-	SPAC3C7.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.056699658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770665	2539206	2541806	275776	278297	SPCC24B10.07	SPAC4G8.13c	gad8	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.125844542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770666	2540220	2538939	276753	275514	SPBC337.03	SPCC1672.04c	rhn1	SPCC1672.04c	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813681031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770667	2540220	2542895	276753	279339	SPBC337.03	SPAC13G6.10c	rhn1	asl1	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.51291481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770668	2540220	2543064	276753	279497	SPBC337.03	SPAC3G6.01	rhn1	hrp3	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.011628716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770669	2540220	2540131	276753	276668	SPBC337.03	SPBC1778.05c	rhn1	SPBC1778.05c	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.017859451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770670	2540220	2539156	276753	275728	SPBC337.03	SPCC1450.08c	rhn1	wtf16	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446697949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770671	2540220	2543592	276753	280007	SPBC337.03	SPAC4F10.18	rhn1	nup37	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.905427547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770672	2540220	2540528	276753	277056	SPBC337.03	SPBC18H10.04c	rhn1	sce3	SPBC337.03|iss4	tif48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.14374476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770673	2540220	2541135	276753	277650	SPBC337.03	SPBC839.03c	rhn1	SPBC839.03c	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.722887359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770674	2540220	2542502	276753	278960	SPBC337.03	SPAC139.06	rhn1	hat1	SPBC337.03|iss4	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201831998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770675	2540220	2540686	276753	277211	SPBC337.03	SPBC21D10.10	rhn1	bdc1	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.391318375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770676	2540220	2538922	276753	275499	SPBC337.03	SPCC16C4.10	rhn1	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.310631352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770677	2540220	2542103	276753	278579	SPBC337.03	SPAC31G5.11	rhn1	pac2	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.562974139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770678	2540220	2540664	276753	277189	SPBC337.03	SPBC215.02	rhn1	bob1	SPBC337.03|iss4	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.842337933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770679	2540220	2541208	276753	277722	SPBC337.03	SPBC887.04c	rhn1	lub1	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.324138715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770680	2540220	2538801	276753	275382	SPBC337.03	SPCC285.13c	rhn1	nup60	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.885393134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770681	2540220	2540425	276753	276953	SPBC337.03	SPBC27.06c	rhn1	mgr2	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.336531538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770682	2540220	2540595	276753	277121	SPBC337.03	SPBC21C3.02c	rhn1	dep1	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.011621242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770683	2540220	2539244	276753	275814	SPBC337.03	SPCC1672.06c	rhn1	asp1	SPBC337.03|iss4	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.194487996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770684	2540220	2543563	276753	279979	SPBC337.03	SPAC664.02c	rhn1	arp8	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.698367828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770685	2540220	2543584	276753	279999	SPBC337.03	SPAPB1E7.11c	rhn1	SPAPB1E7.11c	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.53755184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770686	2540220	2538700	276753	275285	SPBC337.03	SPCC645.13	rhn1	SPCC645.13	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.472439229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770687	2540220	3361543	276753	280619	SPBC337.03	SPAC9.13c	rhn1	cwf16	SPBC337.03|iss4	SPAPJ735.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.380359255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770688	2540220	2539023	276753	275596	SPBC337.03	SPCC594.05c	rhn1	spf1	SPBC337.03|iss4	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.770280882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770689	2540220	2538715	276753	275299	SPBC337.03	SPCC1223.05c	rhn1	rpl3702	SPBC337.03|iss4	rpl37|rpl37-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.150016414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770690	2540220	2541776	276753	278270	SPBC337.03	SPAC23H3.05c	rhn1	swd1	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.087640585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770691	2540220	2539845	276753	276393	SPBC337.03	SPBC12C2.02c	rhn1	ste20	SPBC337.03|iss4	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.555539985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770692	2540220	2543445	276753	279865	SPBC337.03	SPAC4F10.13c	rhn1	mpd2	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.415739973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770693	2540220	2541545	276753	278045	SPBC337.03	SPAC22F8.07c	rhn1	rtf1	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.028847856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770694	2540220	2538770	276753	275353	SPBC337.03	SPCC1753.02c	rhn1	git3	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877457592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770695	2540220	2542652	276753	279106	SPBC337.03	SPAC1687.15	rhn1	gsk3	SPBC337.03|iss4	skp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.017316579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770696	2540220	2542776	276753	279225	SPBC337.03	SPAC167.01	rhn1	ire1	SPBC337.03|iss4	ppk4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513260387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770697	2540220	2538811	276753	275392	SPBC337.03	SPCC330.03c	rhn1	SPCC330.03c	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851257427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770698	2540220	2543412	276753	279834	SPBC337.03	SPAC637.07	rhn1	moe1	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.758830717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770699	2540220	2539733	276753	276285	SPBC337.03	SPBC16E9.12c	rhn1	pab2	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.46102524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770700	2540220	2542971	276753	279410	SPBC337.03	SPAC105.02c	rhn1	SPAC105.02c	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870150738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770701	2540220	2541889	276753	278379	SPBC337.03	SPAC2F7.03c	rhn1	pom1	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.023432591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770702	2540220	2540543	276753	277070	SPBC337.03	SPBC29A10.06c	rhn1	ely5	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704449361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770703	2540220	2541496	276753	277998	SPBC337.03	SPAC23D3.09	rhn1	arp42	SPBC337.03|iss4	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.525169412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770704	2540220	2539995	276753	276539	SPBC337.03	SPBC1105.09	rhn1	ubc15	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.787782235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770705	2540220	2539667	276753	276222	SPBC337.03	SPBC13G1.08c	rhn1	ash2	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.894409149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770706	2540220	2542032	276753	278514	SPBC337.03	SPAC23C11.04c	rhn1	pnk1	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.234598427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770707	2540220	2542007	276753	278490	SPBC337.03	SPAC20H4.07	rhn1	rad57	SPBC337.03|iss4	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.073320395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770708	2540220	2541542	276753	278042	SPBC337.03	SPAC4G9.02	rhn1	rnh201	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.118801291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770709	2540220	2541720	276753	278214	SPBC337.03	SPAC23H3.13c	rhn1	gpa2	SPBC337.03|iss4	git8	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874527347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770710	2540220	2540394	276753	276922	SPBC337.03	SPBC2D10.09	rhn1	snr1	SPBC337.03|iss4	SPBC2D10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.721844412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770711	2540220	2541900	276753	278390	SPBC337.03	SPAC23H4.17c	rhn1	srb10	SPBC337.03|iss4	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.353610601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770712	2540220	2541708	276753	278203	SPBC337.03	SPAC31A2.02	rhn1	trm112	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.978424421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770713	2540220	2540599	276753	277125	SPBC337.03	SPBC29A3.10c	rhn1	atp14	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505026928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770714	2540220	2540844	276753	277361	SPBC337.03	SPBC1921.04c	rhn1	SPBC1921.04c	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.991425327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770715	2540220	2541378	276753	277889	SPBC337.03	SPBP8B7.21	rhn1	ubp3	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040126473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770716	2540220	2538848	276753	275429	SPBC337.03	SPCC613.12c	rhn1	raf1	SPBC337.03|iss4	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.34791074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770717	2540220	2539354	276753	275920	SPBC337.03	SPCC4F11.03c	rhn1	SPCC4F11.03c	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.849638297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770718	2540220	2538762	276753	275345	SPBC337.03	SPCC306.04c	rhn1	set1	SPBC337.03|iss4	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.872568034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770719	2540220	2543628	276753	280042	SPBC337.03	SPAC3H8.10	rhn1	spo20	SPBC337.03|iss4	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517465079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770720	2540220	2542327	276753	278793	SPBC337.03	SPAC16C9.06c	rhn1	upf1	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.442926861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770721	2540220	2543670	276753	280084	SPBC337.03	SPAPB1E7.06c	rhn1	eme1	SPBC337.03|iss4	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.484378478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770722	2540220	2539925	276753	276469	SPBC337.03	SPBC16H5.13	rhn1	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.295851097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770723	2540220	2541531	276753	278031	SPBC337.03	SPAC25A8.01c	rhn1	fft3	SPBC337.03|iss4	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.890260289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770724	2540220	2540346	276753	276875	SPBC337.03	SPBC2F12.03c	rhn1	ebs1	SPBC337.03|iss4	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.666092238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770725	2540220	2541470	276753	277972	SPBC337.03	SPAPYUG7.04c	rhn1	rpb9	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.432736304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770726	2540220	2541114	276753	277629	SPBC337.03	SPBC582.09	rhn1	pex11	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86985005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770727	2540220	2540829	276753	277347	SPBC337.03	SPBC800.09	rhn1	sum2	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.900865726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770728	2540220	2543329	276753	279752	SPBC337.03	SPAC56F8.02	rhn1	SPAC56F8.02	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865457984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770729	2540220	2540164	276753	276699	SPBC337.03	SPBC1683.03c	rhn1	SPBC1683.03c	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807600687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770730	2540220	2543427	276753	279847	SPBC337.03	SPAPB1A10.15	rhn1	arv1	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.843447162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770731	2540220	2542826	276753	279273	SPBC337.03	SPAC13G6.09	rhn1	SPAC13G6.09	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.625307139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770732	2540220	2541404	276753	277913	SPBC337.03	SPBPB2B2.18	rhn1	SPBPB2B2.18	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.681403107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770733	2540220	2541115	276753	277630	SPBC337.03	SPBC660.07	rhn1	ntp1	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.950894814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770734	2540220	2540555	276753	277082	SPBC337.03	SPBP16F5.02	rhn1	mcs2	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.184622293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770735	2540220	2539702	276753	276255	SPBC337.03	SPBC1604.12	rhn1	SPBC1604.12	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.194555103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770736	2540220	2539205	276753	275775	SPBC337.03	SPCC4B3.15	rhn1	mid1	SPBC337.03|iss4	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.76788791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770737	2540220	2539375	276753	275941	SPBC337.03	SPCC4G3.11	rhn1	mug154	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.592881786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770738	2540220	2543384	276753	279806	SPBC337.03	SPAC637.06	rhn1	gmh5	SPBC337.03|iss4	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.722550578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770739	2540220	2541806	276753	278297	SPBC337.03	SPAC4G8.13c	rhn1	prz1	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.664091426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770740	2540220	2542886	276753	279331	SPBC337.03	SPAC1486.01	rhn1	SPAC1486.01	SPBC337.03|iss4	sod2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.260575716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770741	2540220	2540309	276753	276839	SPBC337.03	SPBC21B10.13c	rhn1	yox1	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.568172572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770742	2540220	2542943	276753	279384	SPBC337.03	SPBC1348.03	rhn1	SPBC1348.03	SPBC337.03|iss4	SPAC1348.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807412707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770743	2540220	2540208	276753	276741	SPBC337.03	SPBC9B6.03	rhn1	SPBC9B6.03	SPBC337.03|iss4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.91871497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770744	2539438	2542207	276001	278682	SPCC4B3.07	SPAC17H9.10c	nro1	ddb1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.115850649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770745	2539438	2541552	276001	278051	SPCC4B3.07	SPAC1142.08	nro1	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.929497916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770746	2539438	2541160	276001	277675	SPCC4B3.07	SPBC725.09c	nro1	hob3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818392217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770747	2539438	2541310	276001	277822	SPCC4B3.07	SPBP18G5.03	nro1	toc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.766091662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770748	2539438	2542549	276001	279006	SPCC4B3.07	SPAC19A8.11c	nro1	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.15546094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770749	2539438	2540184	276001	276717	SPCC4B3.07	SPBC106.12c	nro1	SPBC106.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324065484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770750	2539438	2541296	276001	277808	SPCC4B3.07	SPBP8B7.06	nro1	rpp201	-	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.760024133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770751	2539438	2541614	276001	278111	SPCC4B3.07	SPAC29A4.20	nro1	elp3	-	kat9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.463315114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770752	2539438	2541488	276001	277990	SPCC4B3.07	SPAC227.17c	nro1	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.61198777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770753	2539438	2540643	276001	277168	SPCC4B3.07	SPBC19G7.06	nro1	mbx1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.096586506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770754	2539438	2539101	276001	275673	SPCC4B3.07	SPCC736.04c	nro1	gma12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.520705466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770755	2540720	2540131	277243	276668	SPBC216.07c	SPBC1778.05c	tor2	SPBC1778.05c	SPBC646.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.565448228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770756	2540720	2539845	277243	276393	SPBC216.07c	SPBC12C2.02c	tor2	ste20	SPBC646.01c	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.00731118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770757	2540847	2541545	277364	278045	SPBC428.18	SPAC22F8.07c	cdt1	rtf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.14521114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770758	2540847	2541096	277364	277611	SPBC428.18	SPBC725.10	cdt1	SPBC725.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92155195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770759	2540847	2542597	277364	279051	SPBC428.18	SPAP8A3.07c	cdt1	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.185643055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770760	2540847	2542242	277364	278713	SPBC428.18	SPAC18G6.04c	cdt1	shm2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983574247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770761	2539117	2538939	275689	275514	SPCC74.06	SPCC1672.04c	mak3	SPCC1672.04c	phk2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642460464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770762	2539117	2542207	275689	278682	SPCC74.06	SPAC17H9.10c	mak3	ddb1	phk2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.768463716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770763	2539117	2542895	275689	279339	SPCC74.06	SPAC13G6.10c	mak3	asl1	phk2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443697427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770764	2539117	2540913	275689	277429	SPCC74.06	SPBC56F2.08c	mak3	SPBC56F2.08c	phk2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.016486593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770765	2539117	2542502	275689	278960	SPCC74.06	SPAC139.06	mak3	hat1	phk2	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.782716826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770766	2539117	2543432	275689	279852	SPCC74.06	SPAC4G8.05	mak3	ppk14	phk2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.445816204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770767	2539117	2538922	275689	275499	SPCC74.06	SPCC16C4.10	mak3	SPCC16C4.10	phk2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.740195193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770768	2539117	2542816	275689	279263	SPCC74.06	SPAC4G8.11c	mak3	atp10	phk2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390100959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770769	2539117	2542689	275689	279142	SPCC74.06	SPAC29B12.04	mak3	snz1	phk2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572950803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770770	2539117	2539434	275689	275997	SPCC74.06	SPCC757.09c	mak3	rnc1	phk2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.807992877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770771	2539117	2542331	275689	278797	SPCC74.06	SPAC1834.05	mak3	alg9	phk2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.049132593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770772	2539117	2541800	275689	278291	SPCC74.06	SPAC732.02c	mak3	SPAC732.02c	phk2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.434471722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770773	2539117	2539628	275689	276185	SPCC74.06	SPBC1604.03c	mak3	SPBC1604.03c	phk2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.715129937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770774	2539117	2541109	275689	277624	SPCC74.06	SPBC6B1.02	mak3	ppk30	phk2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989746075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770775	2539117	2539689	275689	276244	SPCC74.06	SPBC1861.03	mak3	mak10	phk2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.622513821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770776	2539117	2540086	275689	276624	SPCC74.06	SPBC16H5.12c	mak3	SPBC16H5.12c	phk2	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.340593693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770777	2539117	2540538	275689	277065	SPCC74.06	SPBC26H8.03	mak3	cho2	phk2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979792367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770778	2539117	2542032	275689	278514	SPCC74.06	SPAC23C11.04c	mak3	pnk1	phk2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.985775414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770779	2539117	2539815	275689	276365	SPCC74.06	SPBC1105.02c	mak3	lys4	phk2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.127158784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770780	2539117	2540327	275689	276857	SPCC74.06	SPBC31F10.07	mak3	lsb5	phk2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.893798631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770781	2539117	2538708	275689	275292	SPCC74.06	SPCC594.01	mak3	SPCC594.01	phk2	SPCC736.16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808503068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770782	2539117	2540184	275689	276717	SPCC74.06	SPBC106.12c	mak3	SPBC106.12c	phk2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.981981664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770783	2539117	2539711	275689	276264	SPCC74.06	SPBC1683.09c	mak3	frp1	phk2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.558603355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770784	2539117	2540946	275689	277462	SPCC74.06	SPBC36.04	mak3	cys11	phk2	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.181624004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770785	2539117	2541156	275689	277671	SPCC74.06	SPBC685.07c	mak3	rpl2701	phk2	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.919573871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770786	2539117	2543071	275689	279504	SPCC74.06	SPAC3C7.06c	mak3	pit1	phk2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.821537769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770787	2539117	2540498	275689	277026	SPCC74.06	SPBC27.02c	mak3	ask1	phk2	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.293058674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770788	2539117	2543304	275689	279728	SPCC74.06	SPAC6B12.12	mak3	tom70	phk2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.394018315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770789	2539117	2540936	275689	277452	SPCC74.06	SPBC800.05c	mak3	atb2	phk2	alp2|ban5|tub1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817978181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770790	2539117	2543380	275689	279802	SPCC74.06	SPAC4G9.16c	mak3	rpl901	phk2	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380153184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770791	2539117	2540146	275689	276683	SPCC74.06	SPBC17A3.06	mak3	SPBC17A3.06	phk2	pi040	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.159562285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770792	2539117	2542119	275689	278595	SPCC74.06	SPAC1834.08	mak3	mak1	phk2	phk3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.129361701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770793	2539117	2541177	275689	277691	SPCC74.06	SPBC725.05c	mak3	SPBC725.05c	phk2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.033269929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770794	2539117	2538730	275689	275314	SPCC74.06	SPCC31H12.02c	mak3	mug73	phk2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.66734935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770795	2540860	2540131	277377	276668	SPBC428.17c	SPBC1778.05c	wpl1	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.030777769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770796	2540293	2542598	276824	279052	SPBC21C3.03	SPAC6G10.08	SPBC21C3.03	idp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.123862954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770797	2540293	2539890	276824	276436	SPBC21C3.03	SPBC16C6.03c	SPBC21C3.03	SPBC16C6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773728701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770798	2540293	2542816	276824	279263	SPBC21C3.03	SPAC4G8.11c	SPBC21C3.03	atp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.710933628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770799	2540293	2539937	276824	276481	SPBC21C3.03	SPBC1539.08	SPBC21C3.03	arf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.840947429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770800	2540293	2540727	276824	277250	SPBC21C3.03	SPBC1921.03c	SPBC21C3.03	mex67	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779677194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770801	2540293	2542277	276824	278746	SPBC21C3.03	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC21C3.03	dbr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.978864753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770802	2540293	2541776	276824	278270	SPBC21C3.03	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC21C3.03	swd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201897121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770803	2540293	2541532	276824	278032	SPBC21C3.03	SPAC2C4.15c	SPBC21C3.03	ubx2	-	ucp13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712932688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770804	2540293	2539974	276824	276518	SPBC21C3.03	SPBC32H8.07	SPBC21C3.03	git5	-	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815920413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770805	2540293	2538841	276824	275422	SPBC21C3.03	SPCC550.03c	SPBC21C3.03	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571543445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770806	2540293	2540201	276824	276734	SPBC21C3.03	SPBC13A2.04c	SPBC21C3.03	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381145338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770807	2540293	2541628	276824	278124	SPBC21C3.03	SPAC110.02	SPBC21C3.03	pds5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819249566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770808	2540293	2539555	276824	276116	SPBC21C3.03	SPCC4B3.08	SPBC21C3.03	lsg1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044550055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770809	2540293	2541175	276824	277689	SPBC21C3.03	SPBC839.13c	SPBC21C3.03	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.436148214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770810	2540293	2539178	276824	275749	SPBC21C3.03	SPCC1682.14	SPBC21C3.03	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634726172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770811	2540293	2543337	276824	279760	SPBC21C3.03	SPAC959.08	SPBC21C3.03	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392611188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770812	2540293	2541806	276824	278297	SPBC21C3.03	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC21C3.03	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.959726919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770813	2540293	2543327	276824	279750	SPBC21C3.03	SPAC1D4.06c	SPBC21C3.03	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781712735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770814	2540293	2542795	276824	279243	SPBC21C3.03	SPAC9G1.05	SPBC21C3.03	aip1	-	SPAC9G1.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390620864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770815	2540293	2542424	276824	278886	SPBC21C3.03	SPAC1805.14	SPBC21C3.03	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868870829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770816	2543071	2538961	279504	275535	SPAC3C7.06c	SPCC285.14	pit1	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.834466377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770817	2543071	2541656	279504	278152	SPAC3C7.06c	SPAC25H1.06	pit1	pcf3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391838184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770818	2543071	2543432	279504	279852	SPAC3C7.06c	SPAC4G8.05	pit1	ppk14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.204643049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770819	2543071	2540560	279504	277087	SPAC3C7.06c	SPBC2D10.14c	pit1	myo51	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.124463734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770820	2543071	2542816	279504	279263	SPAC3C7.06c	SPAC4G8.11c	pit1	atp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.260330022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770821	2543071	2539564	279504	276125	SPAC3C7.06c	SPCC550.12	pit1	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.402243478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770822	2543071	2543453	279504	279873	SPAC3C7.06c	SPAC3G9.03	pit1	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781747524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770823	2543071	2539117	279504	275689	SPAC3C7.06c	SPCC74.06	pit1	mak3	-	phk2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.821537769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770824	2543071	2539388	279504	275953	SPAC3C7.06c	SPCC24B10.12	pit1	cgi121	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780791452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770825	2543071	2542950	279504	279390	SPAC3C7.06c	SPAC12B10.03	pit1	bun62	-	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319361996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770826	2543071	2541876	279504	278366	SPAC3C7.06c	SPAP27G11.11c	pit1	SPAP27G11.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767758542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770827	2543071	2540665	279504	277190	SPAC3C7.06c	SPBC83.02c	pit1	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.486420522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770828	2543071	2543378	279504	279800	SPAC3C7.06c	SPAC3H8.07c	pit1	pac10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.161605103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770829	2543071	2541900	279504	278390	SPAC3C7.06c	SPAC23H4.17c	pit1	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.552612897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770830	2543071	2542597	279504	279051	SPAC3C7.06c	SPAP8A3.07c	pit1	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147148245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770831	2543071	2539847	279504	276395	SPAC3C7.06c	SPBC530.14c	pit1	dsk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.886321916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770832	2543071	2541746	279504	278240	SPAC3C7.06c	SPAC20G4.04c	pit1	hus1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.923426082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770833	2543071	2538762	279504	275345	SPAC3C7.06c	SPCC306.04c	pit1	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.692639638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770834	2543071	2543567	279504	279983	SPAC3C7.06c	SPAC890.03	pit1	ppk16	-	mug92	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.093445369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770835	2543071	2542940	279504	279381	SPAC3C7.06c	SPAC31A2.12	pit1	SPAC31A2.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444918699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770836	2543071	2540936	279504	277452	SPAC3C7.06c	SPBC800.05c	pit1	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873977061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770837	2543071	2541806	279504	278297	SPAC3C7.06c	SPAC4G8.13c	pit1	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.091514459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770838	2543071	2542571	279504	279027	SPAC3C7.06c	SPAC589.02c	pit1	med13	-	spTrap240|srb9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633221821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770839	2543071	2540649	279504	277174	SPAC3C7.06c	SPBC19F8.08	pit1	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57574601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770840	2541843	2538806	278334	275387	SPAC23H3.02c	SPCC1840.09	ini1	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.400122277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770841	2541175	2542207	277689	278682	SPBC839.13c	SPAC17H9.10c	rpl1601	ddb1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.169507704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770842	2541175	2541562	277689	278061	SPBC839.13c	SPAC24B11.05	rpl1601	SPAC24B11.05	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.057440521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770843	2541175	2539788	277689	276338	SPBC839.13c	SPBC17D1.02	rpl1601	dph2	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388095034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770844	2541175	2541728	277689	278222	SPBC839.13c	SPAC20G4.03c	rpl1601	hri1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.62705085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770845	2541175	2540833	277689	277351	SPBC839.13c	SPBC18H10.20c	rpl1601	any1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037181128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770846	2541175	2542518	277689	278976	SPBC839.13c	SPAC1B3.16c	rpl1601	vht1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.976991519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770847	2541175	2541512	277689	278013	SPBC839.13c	SPAC11E3.08c	rpl1601	nse6	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.144111596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770848	2541175	2540913	277689	277429	SPBC839.13c	SPBC56F2.08c	rpl1601	SPBC56F2.08c	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.588567845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770849	2541175	2541985	277689	278470	SPBC839.13c	SPAC20G8.04c	rpl1601	SPAC20G8.04c	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.508439025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770850	2541175	2542066	277689	278543	SPBC839.13c	SPAC227.05	rpl1601	SPAC227.05	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.874753037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770851	2541175	2542706	277689	279159	SPBC839.13c	SPAC29B12.13	rpl1601	SPAC29B12.13	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319090481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770852	2541175	2541552	277689	278051	SPBC839.13c	SPAC1142.08	rpl1601	fhl1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPAC8C9.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.754277552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770853	2541175	2542293	277689	278761	SPBC839.13c	SPAC17G8.14c	rpl1601	pck1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPAC22H10.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.160063127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770854	2541175	2539035	277689	275608	SPBC839.13c	SPCC794.09c	rpl1601	tef101	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.406057061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770855	2541175	2543559	277689	279975	SPBC839.13c	SPAC664.04c	rpl1601	rps1602	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	rps16|rps16-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098837128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770856	2541175	2540296	277689	276827	SPBC839.13c	SPBC2D10.05	rpl1601	exg3	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.464963349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770857	2541175	2542502	277689	278960	SPBC839.13c	SPAC139.06	rpl1601	hat1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443525205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770858	2541175	5802967	277689	858105	SPBC839.13c	SPAC20G4.08	rpl1601	pdc1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPAC20G4.08|SPAC4F10.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514790823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770859	2541175	2542546	277689	279003	SPBC839.13c	SPAC1399.05c	rpl1601	toe1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPAC1399.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517153627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770860	2541175	2543527	277689	279945	SPBC839.13c	SPAC4C5.01	rpl1601	SPAC4C5.01	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.850937503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770861	2541175	2540694	277689	277218	SPBC839.13c	SPBC19C7.10	rpl1601	bqt4	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.193902211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770862	2541175	2543434	277689	279854	SPBC839.13c	SPAC8F11.02c	rpl1601	dph3	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.260405619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770863	2541175	2539800	277689	276350	SPBC839.13c	SPBC1347.13c	rpl1601	mrm1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPBC1347.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.878245058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770864	2541175	2540686	277689	277211	SPBC839.13c	SPBC21D10.10	rpl1601	bdc1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776676652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770865	2541175	2540491	277689	277019	SPBC839.13c	SPBC28E12.04	rpl1601	SPBC28E12.04	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149629454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770866	2541175	2540664	277689	277189	SPBC839.13c	SPBC215.02	rpl1601	bob1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037742977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770867	2541175	2540999	277689	277515	SPBC839.13c	SPBC4B4.04	rpl1601	SPBC4B4.04	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19620819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770868	2541175	2541208	277689	277722	SPBC839.13c	SPBC887.04c	rpl1601	lub1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.471411889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770869	2541175	2542179	277689	278654	SPBC839.13c	SPAC17C9.12	rpl1601	scs22	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPAC17C9.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.774061414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770870	2541175	2541012	277689	277527	SPBC839.13c	SPBC3H7.12	rpl1601	rav2	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.417669962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770871	2541175	2538847	277689	275428	SPBC839.13c	SPCC594.06c	rpl1601	SPCC594.06c	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101478356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770872	2541175	2539443	277689	276006	SPBC839.13c	SPCC736.02	rpl1601	SPCC736.02	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.871118162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770873	2541175	2542273	277689	278742	SPBC839.13c	SPAC17H9.13c	rpl1601	SPAC17H9.13c	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.719096707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770874	2541175	2543579	277689	279994	SPBC839.13c	SPAC9.11	rpl1601	SPAC9.11	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44047479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770875	2541175	2541682	277689	278178	SPBC839.13c	SPAC15F9.02	rpl1601	seh1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445590971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770876	2541175	2542299	277689	278766	SPBC839.13c	SPAC18B11.10	rpl1601	tup11	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.072871203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770877	2541175	2542724	277689	279175	SPBC839.13c	SPAC767.01c	rpl1601	vps1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPAC9G1.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.928664766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770878	2541175	2539249	277689	275819	SPBC839.13c	SPCC1450.05c	rpl1601	rox3	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.350170088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770879	2541175	2540919	277689	277435	SPBC839.13c	SPBC543.07	rpl1601	pek1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	mkk1|skh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.302389615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770880	2541175	2543383	277689	279805	SPBC839.13c	SPAC869.08	rpl1601	pcm2	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145855205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770881	2541175	2539331	277689	275897	SPBC839.13c	SPCC24B10.09	rpl1601	rps1702	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	rps17|rps17-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096766613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770882	2541175	2542555	277689	279012	SPBC839.13c	SPAC1952.06c	rpl1601	SPAC1952.06c	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.121878018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770883	2541175	2539575	277689	276135	SPBC839.13c	SPCP20C8.02c	rpl1601	SPCP20C8.02c	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.185519204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770884	2541175	2543048	277689	279483	SPBC839.13c	SPAC3F10.02c	rpl1601	trk1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	sptrk	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776550683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770885	2541175	2541761	277689	278255	SPBC839.13c	SPAC7D4.12c	rpl1601	SPAC7D4.12c	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927415304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770886	2541175	2542318	277689	278784	SPBC839.13c	SPAC16C9.05	rpl1601	cph1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.168818041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770887	2541175	2540295	277689	276826	SPBC839.13c	SPBC3B8.05	rpl1601	SPBC3B8.05	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	dph1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.973742934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770888	2541175	2540467	277689	276995	SPBC839.13c	SPBC2G2.07c	rpl1601	mug178	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816627275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770889	2541175	2540595	277689	277121	SPBC839.13c	SPBC21C3.02c	rpl1601	dep1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.410477553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770890	2541175	2543108	277689	279540	SPBC839.13c	SPAC3A12.13c	rpl1601	SPAC3A12.13c	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.719594342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770891	2541175	2541522	277689	278023	SPBC839.13c	SPAC23E2.01	rpl1601	fep1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	gaf2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.345605688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770892	2541175	2538866	277689	275446	SPBC839.13c	SPCC1620.12c	rpl1601	SPCC1620.12c	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87105782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770893	2541175	2541905	277689	278395	SPBC839.13c	SPAC6G9.01c	rpl1601	SPAC6G9.01c	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.251472805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770894	2541175	2539381	277689	275947	SPBC839.13c	SPCC1739.10	rpl1601	mug33	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.585598235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770895	2541175	2538906	277689	275483	SPBC839.13c	SPCC1259.03	rpl1601	rpa12	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.417433327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770896	2541175	2542213	277689	278687	SPBC839.13c	SPAC3G6.13c	rpl1601	rpl4101	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	rpl41-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98980464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770897	2541175	2541926	277689	278414	SPBC839.13c	SPAC222.14c	rpl1601	SPAC222.14c	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.682018762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770898	2541175	2539310	277689	275877	SPBC839.13c	SPCC285.17	rpl1601	spp27	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	uaf30	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.07790591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770899	2541175	2542568	277689	279024	SPBC839.13c	SPAC1952.02	rpl1601	tma23	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.479563319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770900	2541175	2539237	277689	275807	SPBC839.13c	SPCC24B10.13	rpl1601	skb5	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928082099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770901	2541175	2541938	277689	278425	SPBC839.13c	SPAC8C9.16c	rpl1601	mug63	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.318982011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770902	2541175	2541885	277689	278375	SPBC839.13c	SPAC22H10.03c	rpl1601	kap114	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.437722992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770903	2541175	2539051	277689	275624	SPBC839.13c	SPCC1183.11	rpl1601	msy1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.72288927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770904	2541175	2542679	277689	279132	SPBC839.13c	SPAC12B10.07	rpl1601	acp1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439605224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770905	2541175	2540797	277689	277316	SPBC839.13c	SPBC18H10.11c	rpl1601	ppr2	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.466785813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770906	2541175	2541800	277689	278291	SPBC839.13c	SPAC732.02c	rpl1601	SPAC732.02c	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.663179114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770907	2541175	2541776	277689	278270	SPBC839.13c	SPAC23H3.05c	rpl1601	swd1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.322036861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770908	2541175	2543593	277689	280008	SPBC839.13c	SPAC4G9.10	rpl1601	arg3	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386683266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770909	2541175	2541982	277689	278467	SPBC839.13c	SPAC23A1.06c	rpl1601	cmk2	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	mkp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.443644621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770910	2541175	2542463	277689	278924	SPBC839.13c	SPAC1834.03c	rpl1601	hhf1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	h4.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510040436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770911	2541175	2542507	277689	278965	SPBC839.13c	SPAC18G6.13	rpl1601	SPAC18G6.13	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.337613906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770912	2541175	2542699	277689	279152	SPBC839.13c	SPAC5H10.07	rpl1601	SPAC5H10.07	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452403031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770913	2541175	2542971	277689	279410	SPBC839.13c	SPAC105.02c	rpl1601	SPAC105.02c	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516145558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770914	2541175	2539073	277689	275645	SPBC839.13c	SPCC1322.02	rpl1601	pxd1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPCC1322.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989160717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770915	2541175	2542420	277689	278883	SPBC839.13c	SPAC19D5.03	rpl1601	cid1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.914963804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770916	2541175	2539898	277689	276444	SPBC839.13c	SPBC12D12.07c	rpl1601	trx2	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153226896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770917	2541175	2541578	277689	278075	SPBC839.13c	SPAC25B8.05	rpl1601	deg1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPAC25B8.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.56790448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770918	2541175	2543208	277689	279637	SPBC839.13c	SPAC328.04	rpl1601	SPAC328.04	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708854808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770919	2541175	2542297	277689	278764	SPBC839.13c	SPAC17H9.06c	rpl1601	SPAC17H9.06c	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444021797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770920	2541175	2541943	277689	278430	SPBC839.13c	SPAC222.07c	rpl1601	hri2	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634372632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770921	2541175	2542168	277689	278643	SPBC839.13c	SPAC17A5.16	rpl1601	ftp105	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321161272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770922	2541175	2539371	277689	275937	SPBC839.13c	SPCC18B5.06	rpl1601	dom34	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPCC18B5.06|erf1|sup45	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.754367614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770923	2541175	2542921	277689	279362	SPBC839.13c	SPAC1093.01	rpl1601	ppr5	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPAC12B10.18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.774377729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770924	2541175	2541496	277689	277998	SPBC839.13c	SPAC23D3.09	rpl1601	arp42	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	arp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.927708307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770925	2541175	2539603	277689	276161	SPBC839.13c	SPBC1289.06c	rpl1601	ppr8	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.459109468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770926	2541175	2538871	277689	275450	SPBC839.13c	SPCC1259.14c	rpl1601	meu27	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	B8647-6	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868042671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770927	2541175	2540231	277689	276763	SPBC839.13c	SPBC336.14c	rpl1601	ppk26	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517386567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770928	2541175	2539293	277689	275861	SPBC839.13c	SPCC553.08c	rpl1601	ria1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPCC553.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.383039965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770929	2541175	2539667	277689	276222	SPBC839.13c	SPBC13G1.08c	rpl1601	ash2	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.402751854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770930	2541175	2542007	277689	278490	SPBC839.13c	SPAC20H4.07	rpl1601	rad57	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390238122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770931	2541175	2538873	277689	275452	SPBC839.13c	SPCC306.11	rpl1601	SPCC306.11	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569700353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770932	2541175	2540751	277689	277273	SPBC839.13c	SPBC20F10.10	rpl1601	psl1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.970561938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770933	2541175	2539815	277689	276365	SPBC839.13c	SPBC1105.02c	rpl1601	lys4	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.559797256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770934	2541175	2540394	277689	276922	SPBC839.13c	SPBC2D10.09	rpl1601	snr1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPBC2D10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.102726169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770935	2541175	2542431	277689	278893	SPBC839.13c	SPAC1A6.01c	rpl1601	SPAC1A6.01c	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPAC23C4.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322779032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770936	2541175	2543378	277689	279800	SPBC839.13c	SPAC3H8.07c	rpl1601	pac10	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.209330155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770937	2541175	2538935	277689	275511	SPBC839.13c	SPCC1682.11c	rpl1601	ctl1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPCC1682.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385670403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770938	2541175	2541900	277689	278390	SPBC839.13c	SPAC23H4.17c	rpl1601	srb10	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515300627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770939	2541175	2542214	277689	278688	SPBC839.13c	SPACUNK4.11c	rpl1601	mpp6	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPACUNK4.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.625302174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770940	2541175	5802861	277689	857999	SPBC839.13c	SPAC1D4.01	rpl1601	tls1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194376457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770941	2541175	2542919	277689	279360	SPBC839.13c	SPAC6C3.08	rpl1601	nas6	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPAC6C3.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.504300736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770942	2541175	2542056	277689	278535	SPBC839.13c	SPAC6G9.14	rpl1601	SPAC6G9.14	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.924396593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770943	2541175	2542055	277689	278534	SPBC839.13c	SPAC6G9.03c	rpl1601	mug183	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.034718359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770944	2541175	2542439	277689	278901	SPBC839.13c	SPAC17A5.08	rpl1601	erp2	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.878348539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770945	2541175	2538949	277689	275523	SPBC839.13c	SPCC320.03	rpl1601	SPCC320.03	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.261499329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770946	2541175	2542125	277689	278601	SPBC839.13c	SPAP8A3.03	rpl1601	SPAP8A3.03	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.558474351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770947	2541175	2540201	277689	276734	SPBC839.13c	SPBC13A2.04c	rpl1601	ptr2	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.910144598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770948	2541175	2541708	277689	278203	SPBC839.13c	SPAC31A2.02	rpl1601	trm112	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.509253949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770949	2541175	2540342	277689	276871	SPBC839.13c	SPBC2G2.01c	rpl1601	liz1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.869044369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770950	2541175	2539402	277689	275967	SPBC839.13c	SPCC613.03	rpl1601	SPCC613.03	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818080541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770951	2541175	2540180	277689	276713	SPBC839.13c	SPBC16D10.11c	rpl1601	rps1801	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	rps18-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.770023038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770952	2541175	2540967	277689	277483	SPBC839.13c	SPBC36B7.08c	rpl1601	SPBC36B7.08c	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.901983504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770953	2541175	2539052	277689	275625	SPBC839.13c	SPCC663.09c	rpl1601	SPCC663.09c	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380692341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770954	2541175	2541266	277689	277780	SPBC839.13c	SPBP16F5.05c	rpl1601	yar1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPBP16F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.071090883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770955	2541175	2541614	277689	278111	SPBC839.13c	SPAC29A4.20	rpl1601	elp3	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	kat9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.088982232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770956	2541175	2540687	277689	277212	SPBC839.13c	SPBC21D10.08c	rpl1601	SPBC21D10.08c	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.102718622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770957	2541175	2542060	277689	278538	SPBC839.13c	SPAC23C11.14	rpl1601	zhf1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	zhf	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.123505625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770958	2541175	2542829	277689	279276	SPBC839.13c	SPAC13D6.02c	rpl1601	byr3	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.617214507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770959	2541175	2541746	277689	278240	SPBC839.13c	SPAC20G4.04c	rpl1601	hus1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984206399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770960	2541175	2543011	277689	279449	SPBC839.13c	SPAC10F6.11c	rpl1601	atg17	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.557935275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770961	2541175	2542781	277689	279230	SPBC839.13c	SPAC57A10.12c	rpl1601	ura3	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384252156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770962	2541175	2543139	277689	279571	SPBC839.13c	SPAC12G12.03	rpl1601	cip2	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.248961806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770963	2541175	2539519	277689	276081	SPBC839.13c	SPCC364.05	rpl1601	vps3	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.341107746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770964	2541175	2542973	277689	279412	SPBC839.13c	SPAC10F6.04	rpl1601	SPAC10F6.04	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.050379781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770965	2541175	2541742	277689	278236	SPBC839.13c	SPAC22H10.09	rpl1601	SPAC22H10.09	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.612849662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770966	2541175	3361520	277689	280596	SPBC839.13c	SPAC1610.02c	rpl1601	SPAC1610.02c	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.592023114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770967	2541175	2542869	277689	279314	SPBC839.13c	SPAC140.02	rpl1601	gar2	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573974648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770968	2541175	2539538	277689	276100	SPBC839.13c	SPCC364.06	rpl1601	nap1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.669311396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770969	2541175	2542806	277689	279254	SPBC839.13c	SPAC1610.01	rpl1601	saf5	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.848236043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770970	2541175	2538907	277689	275484	SPBC839.13c	SPCC24B10.19c	rpl1601	nts1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645520483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770971	2541175	2539160	277689	275732	SPBC839.13c	SPCC18.17c	rpl1601	SPCC18.17c	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.183362305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770972	2541175	2541786	277689	278278	SPBC839.13c	SPAC22F3.08c	rpl1601	rok1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87073266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770973	2541175	2540442	277689	276970	SPBC839.13c	SPBC25B2.04c	rpl1601	mtg1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.819907461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770974	2541175	2541156	277689	277671	SPBC839.13c	SPBC685.07c	rpl1601	rpl2701	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769585635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770975	2541175	2538762	277689	275345	SPBC839.13c	SPCC306.04c	rpl1601	set1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.239223496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770976	2541175	2541370	277689	277881	SPBC839.13c	SPBP8B7.07c	rpl1601	set6	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.209830227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770977	2541175	2539809	277689	276359	SPBC839.13c	SPBC16E9.02c	rpl1601	SPBC16E9.02c	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.915261663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770978	2541175	2543628	277689	280042	SPBC839.13c	SPAC3H8.10	rpl1601	spo20	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445349357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770979	2541175	2542516	277689	278974	SPBC839.13c	SPAC2F7.04	rpl1601	pmc2	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.747145615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770980	2541175	2543619	277689	280033	SPBC839.13c	SPAC4F10.04	rpl1601	ypa1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992355994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770981	2541175	2541909	277689	278399	SPBC839.13c	SPAC227.01c	rpl1601	erd1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.380848376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770982	2541175	2540779	277689	277298	SPBC839.13c	SPBC19F8.06c	rpl1601	meu22	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983011567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770983	2541175	2539925	277689	276469	SPBC839.13c	SPBC16H5.13	rpl1601	SPBC16H5.13	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.361620926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770984	2541175	2539030	277689	275603	SPBC839.13c	SPCP1E11.02	rpl1601	ppk38	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094012753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770985	2541175	2543304	277689	279728	SPBC839.13c	SPAC6B12.12	rpl1601	tom70	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.432023449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770986	2541175	2538717	277689	275301	SPBC839.13c	SPCC1235.02	rpl1601	bio2	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPCC320.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.316766803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770987	2541175	2541358	277689	277869	SPBC839.13c	SPBP4H10.16c	rpl1601	SPBP4H10.16c	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.123402847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770988	2541175	2538714	277689	275298	SPBC839.13c	SPCC330.11	rpl1601	btb1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.908715532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770989	2541175	2543662	277689	280076	SPBC839.13c	SPAC9.07c	rpl1601	SPAC9.07c	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.914091632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770990	2541175	2539471	277689	276034	SPBC839.13c	SPCC576.14	rpl1601	dph5	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.324438962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770991	2541175	2541470	277689	277972	SPBC839.13c	SPAPYUG7.04c	rpl1601	rpb9	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.158202249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770992	2541175	2540325	277689	276855	SPBC839.13c	SPBC21B10.10	rpl1601	rps402	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	rps4-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.107735163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770993	2541175	2542418	277689	278881	SPBC839.13c	SPAC1805.07c	rpl1601	dad2	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.347575686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770994	2541175	2542042	277689	278523	SPBC839.13c	SPAC23A1.14c	rpl1601	SPAC23A1.14c	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707727479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770995	2541175	2539514	277689	276076	SPBC839.13c	SPCC663.14c	rpl1601	trp663	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPCC663.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.662870282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770996	2541175	2542826	277689	279273	SPBC839.13c	SPAC13G6.09	rpl1601	SPAC13G6.09	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.921227921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770997	2541175	2541404	277689	277913	SPBC839.13c	SPBPB2B2.18	rpl1601	SPBPB2B2.18	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.412136052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770998	2541175	2541380	277689	277891	SPBC839.13c	SPBPB2B2.13	rpl1601	gal1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.011647005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
770999	2541175	2542878	277689	279323	SPBC839.13c	SPAC57A10.09c	rpl1601	nhp6	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.393190971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771000	2541175	2541789	277689	278281	SPBC839.13c	SPAC23H4.08	rpl1601	iwr1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.24297627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771001	2541175	2540297	277689	276828	SPBC839.13c	SPBC24C6.08c	rpl1601	bhd1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	bhd	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.755001663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771002	2541175	2540927	277689	277443	SPBC839.13c	SPBC365.06	rpl1601	pmt3	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	smt3|ubl2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.9236909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771003	2541175	2542250	277689	278720	SPBC839.13c	SPAC17D4.03c	rpl1601	cis4	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.390274924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771004	2541175	2538694	277689	275279	SPBC839.13c	SPCC191.09c	rpl1601	gst1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.889089421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771005	2541175	2539702	277689	276255	SPBC839.13c	SPBC1604.12	rpl1601	SPBC1604.12	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.874358324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771006	2541175	2540333	277689	276863	SPBC839.13c	SPBC21B10.07	rpl1601	SPBC21B10.07	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.020693538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771007	2541175	2542904	277689	279348	SPBC839.13c	SPAC144.11	rpl1601	rps1102	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	rps11|rps11-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985970986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771008	2541175	2540278	277689	276809	SPBC839.13c	SPBC1A4.04	rpl1601	SPBC1A4.04	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.260376219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771009	2541175	2539375	277689	275941	SPBC839.13c	SPCC4G3.11	rpl1601	mug154	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.14836899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771010	2541175	2543380	277689	279802	SPBC839.13c	SPAC4G9.16c	rpl1601	rpl901	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	rpl9-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.925509632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771011	2541175	2539189	277689	275760	SPBC839.13c	SPCC1682.16	rpl1601	rpt4	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.130730995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771012	2541175	2541941	277689	278428	SPBC839.13c	SPAC20H4.03c	rpl1601	tfs1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193091671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771013	2541175	2543486	277689	279906	SPBC839.13c	SPAC959.07	rpl1601	rps403	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	rps4|rps4-3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.46327297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771014	2541175	2541398	277689	277907	SPBC839.13c	SPBPB2B2.11	rpl1601	SPBPB2B2.11	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817791284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771015	2541175	2542119	277689	278595	SPBC839.13c	SPAC1834.08	rpl1601	mak1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	phk3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.140341864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771016	2541175	3361410	277689	280486	SPBC839.13c	SPAC1527.01	rpl1601	mok11	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPAC23D3.15	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509278092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771017	2541175	2538861	277689	275441	SPBC839.13c	SPCC1620.11	rpl1601	nup97	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	mug87	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379643664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771018	2541175	2541806	277689	278297	SPBC839.13c	SPAC4G8.13c	rpl1601	prz1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.394270085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771019	2541175	2540409	277689	276937	SPBC839.13c	SPBC2D10.11c	rpl1601	nap2	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	nap1.2|nap12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645390703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771020	2541175	2543087	277689	279520	SPBC839.13c	SPAC30C2.04	rpl1601	SPAC30C2.04	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09812993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771021	2541175	2543076	277689	279509	SPBC839.13c	SPAC30C2.07	rpl1601	SPAC30C2.07	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.877808737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771022	2541175	2542175	277689	278650	SPBC839.13c	SPAC1F3.02c	rpl1601	mkh1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.625128476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771023	2541175	2539743	277689	276295	SPBC839.13c	SPBC16A3.08c	rpl1601	oga1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPBC16A3.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.403308761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771024	2541175	2539588	277689	276146	SPBC839.13c	SPCC962.04	rpl1601	rps1201	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	rps12|rps12-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928489551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771025	2541175	2541502	277689	278004	SPBC839.13c	SPAC23D3.04c	rpl1601	gpd2	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.921671267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771026	2541175	2541646	277689	278142	SPBC839.13c	SPAC750.06c	rpl1601	SPAC750.06c	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931262132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771027	2541175	2539085	277689	275657	SPBC839.13c	SPCC285.15c	rpl1601	rps2802	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	rps28|rps28-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2683753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771028	2541175	2543372	277689	279794	SPBC839.13c	SPAPB1A10.09	rpl1601	ase1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.995255385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771029	2541175	2543374	277689	279796	SPBC839.13c	SPAPB1A10.08	rpl1601	SPAPB1A10.08	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.38161561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771030	2541175	2543333	277689	279756	SPBC839.13c	SPAC694.02	rpl1601	SPAC694.02	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632023385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771031	2541175	2538947	277689	275521	SPBC839.13c	SPCC1682.12c	rpl1601	ubp16	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.916666622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771032	2541175	2543448	277689	279868	SPBC839.13c	SPAC3H5.07	rpl1601	rpl702	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046950013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771033	2541175	2540859	277689	277376	SPBC839.13c	SPBC4C3.09	rpl1601	SPBC4C3.09	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809119196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771034	2541175	2542656	277689	279110	SPBC839.13c	SPAC2E1P3.05c	rpl1601	SPAC2E1P3.05c	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.777259163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771035	2541175	2543472	277689	279892	SPBC839.13c	SPAC959.04c	rpl1601	omh6	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326053995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771036	2541175	2542561	277689	279017	SPBC839.13c	SPAC31G5.17c	rpl1601	rps1001	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	rps10-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.136699798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771037	2541175	2540208	277689	276741	SPBC839.13c	SPBC9B6.03	rpl1601	SPBC9B6.03	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873925558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771038	2541175	2543501	277689	279919	SPBC839.13c	SPAC664.14	rpl1601	amt2	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.497047786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771039	2541175	2540787	277689	277306	SPBC839.13c	SPBC1921.07c	rpl1601	sgf29	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.348825734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771040	2541175	2542578	277689	279034	SPBC839.13c	SPAC18B11.09c	rpl1601	SPAC18B11.09c	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379055036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771041	2541175	2542571	277689	279027	SPBC839.13c	SPAC589.02c	rpl1601	med13	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	spTrap240|srb9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.813334292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771042	2541175	2540649	277689	277174	SPBC839.13c	SPBC19F8.08	rpl1601	rps401	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043778733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771043	2541786	2539788	278278	276338	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC17D1.02	rok1	dph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.836781051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771044	2541786	2540060	278278	276598	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC106.01	rok1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.306646374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771045	2541786	2542598	278278	279052	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC6G10.08	rok1	idp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.701002925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771046	2541786	2542518	278278	278976	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC1B3.16c	rok1	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.053980677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771047	2541786	2542812	278278	279259	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC6F6.01	rok1	cch1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866355099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771048	2541786	2539940	278278	276484	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC16A3.10	rok1	SPBC16A3.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576359159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771049	2541786	2542671	278278	279124	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC824.09c	rok1	SPAC824.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.07157598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771050	2541786	2543559	278278	279975	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC664.04c	rok1	rps1602	-	rps16|rps16-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815536768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771051	2541786	2540686	278278	277211	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC21D10.10	rok1	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.191684569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771052	2541786	2540664	278278	277189	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC215.02	rok1	bob1	-	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.048813197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771053	2541786	2541361	278278	277872	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBP8B7.10c	rok1	utp16	-	SPBP8B7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.620943305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771054	2541786	2539420	278278	275985	SPAC22F3.08c	SPCC970.07c	rok1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636456478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771055	2541786	2540919	278278	277435	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC543.07	rok1	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.306602665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771056	2541786	2543453	278278	279873	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC3G9.03	rok1	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.823368909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771057	2541786	2539331	278278	275897	SPAC22F3.08c	SPCC24B10.09	rok1	rps1702	-	rps17|rps17-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.456302277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771058	2541786	2538833	278278	275414	SPAC22F3.08c	SPCP1E11.11	rok1	puf6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807953923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771059	2541786	2542012	278278	278495	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC23C11.02c	rok1	rps23	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.198951504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771060	2541786	2540467	278278	276995	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC2G2.07c	rok1	mug178	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.479693503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771061	2541786	2541428	278278	277933	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC14C4.11	rok1	SPAC14C4.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925153213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771062	2541786	2543584	278278	279999	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAPB1E7.11c	rok1	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.613785564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771063	2541786	2540825	278278	277343	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC428.08c	rok1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391786162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771064	2541786	2541021	278278	277536	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC3B8.10c	rok1	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.75154885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771065	2541786	2540964	278278	277480	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC365.16	rok1	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.494032281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771066	2541786	2542950	278278	279390	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC12B10.03	rok1	bun62	-	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638820797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771067	2541786	2540797	278278	277316	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC18H10.11c	rok1	ppr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.414476063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771068	2541786	2538715	278278	275299	SPAC22F3.08c	SPCC1223.05c	rok1	rpl3702	-	rpl37|rpl37-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043059723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771069	2541786	2540892	278278	277408	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC530.01	rok1	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579348268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771070	2541786	2541982	278278	278467	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC23A1.06c	rok1	cmk2	-	mkp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.916941824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771071	2541786	2542463	278278	278924	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC1834.03c	rok1	hhf1	-	h4.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699957943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771072	2541786	2543483	278278	279903	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAPB2B4.02	rok1	grx5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321827553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771073	2541786	2543412	278278	279834	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC637.07	rok1	moe1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.270369281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771074	2541786	2542921	278278	279362	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC1093.01	rok1	ppr5	-	SPAC12B10.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38484486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771075	2541786	2541899	278278	278389	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC22E12.11c	rok1	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.484338036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771076	2541786	2540231	278278	276763	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC336.14c	rok1	ppk26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.881814813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771077	2541786	2543406	278278	279828	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC9.12c	rok1	atp12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328518317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771078	2541786	2540394	278278	276922	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC2D10.09	rok1	snr1	-	SPBC2D10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.697244962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771079	2541786	2540836	278278	277354	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC18H10.19	rok1	vps38	-	atg14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.610931604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771080	2541786	2542867	278278	279312	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC343.16	rok1	lys2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.86991506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771081	2541786	2540387	278278	276915	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC24C6.04	rok1	SPBC24C6.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.327109065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771082	2541786	2539368	278278	275934	SPAC22F3.08c	SPCC16A11.07	rok1	coq10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.853421839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771083	2541786	2539847	278278	276395	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC530.14c	rok1	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.79150624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771084	2541786	2540599	278278	277125	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC29A3.10c	rok1	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.622922011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771085	2541786	2541266	278278	277780	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBP16F5.05c	rok1	yar1	-	SPBP16F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.022149043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771086	2541786	2541186	278278	277700	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC725.01	rok1	SPBC725.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449384345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771087	2541786	2543390	278278	279812	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC631.01c	rok1	acp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452725451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771088	2541786	2541614	278278	278111	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC29A4.20	rok1	elp3	-	kat9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.252404477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771089	2541786	2538690	278278	275275	SPAC22F3.08c	SPCC1393.05	rok1	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.498471541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771090	2541786	2538884	278278	275462	SPAC22F3.08c	SPCC1393.08	rok1	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445472289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771091	2541786	2539812	278278	276362	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC1347.02	rok1	fkbp39	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.80330292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771092	2541786	2541742	278278	278236	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC22H10.09	rok1	SPAC22H10.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.44718274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771093	2541786	2543193	278278	279622	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC3F10.11c	rok1	abc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.374975677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771094	2541786	2538848	278278	275429	SPAC22F3.08c	SPCC613.12c	rok1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.589651493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771095	2541786	3361520	278278	280596	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC1610.02c	rok1	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.608516557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771096	2541786	2541144	278278	277659	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC685.06	rok1	rps001	-	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.407845571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771097	2541786	2542673	278278	279126	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC26A3.11	rok1	SPAC26A3.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439988392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771098	2541786	2541713	278278	278208	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC3A12.12	rok1	atp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4486222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771099	2541786	2540910	278278	277426	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC577.02	rok1	rpl3801	-	rpl38-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096971078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771100	2541786	2541175	278278	277689	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC839.13c	rok1	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87073266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771101	2541786	2543670	278278	280084	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAPB1E7.06c	rok1	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462611517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771102	2541786	2540800	278278	277319	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC409.20c	rok1	psh3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930769375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771103	2541786	2543304	278278	279728	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC6B12.12	rok1	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.077343075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771104	2541786	2540998	278278	277514	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC3D6.05	rok1	ptp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.382693001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771105	2541786	2539471	278278	276034	SPAC22F3.08c	SPCC576.14	rok1	dph5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38882684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771106	2541786	2541531	278278	278031	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC25A8.01c	rok1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.505940245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771107	2541786	2541114	278278	277629	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC582.09	rok1	pex11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.406215256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771108	2541786	2540699	278278	277223	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC800.08	rok1	gcd10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979954651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771109	2541786	2540829	278278	277347	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC800.09	rok1	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.939276751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771110	2541786	2541789	278278	278281	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC23H4.08	rok1	iwr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.716866814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771111	2541786	2539375	278278	275941	SPAC22F3.08c	SPCC4G3.11	rok1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.01269216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771112	2541786	2543380	278278	279802	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC4G9.16c	rok1	rpl901	-	rpl9-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98638118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771113	2541786	2540146	278278	276683	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC17A3.06	rok1	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044704932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771114	2541786	2539178	278278	275749	SPAC22F3.08c	SPCC1682.14	rok1	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.463923116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771115	2541786	2543337	278278	279760	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC959.08	rok1	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980386018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771116	2541786	2541238	278278	277752	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC8E4.05c	rok1	SPBC8E4.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444315783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771117	2541786	2543087	278278	279520	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC30C2.04	rok1	SPAC30C2.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.872311778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771118	2541786	2540558	278278	277085	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC2D10.17	rok1	clr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.394850493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771119	2541786	2539588	278278	276146	SPAC22F3.08c	SPCC962.04	rok1	rps1201	-	rps12|rps12-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808397443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771120	2541786	2539085	278278	275657	SPAC22F3.08c	SPCC285.15c	rok1	rps2802	-	rps28|rps28-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.343698256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771121	2541786	2543448	278278	279868	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC3H5.07	rok1	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092560237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771122	2541786	2543472	278278	279892	SPAC22F3.08c	SPAC959.04c	rok1	omh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.133253284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771123	2541786	2540649	278278	277174	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC19F8.08	rok1	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.073549102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771124	2542461	2541912	278922	278402	SPAC19A8.13	SPAC222.16c	usp101	csn3	snp1	SPAC821.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.84423469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771125	2542461	2542969	278922	279409	SPAC19A8.13	SPAC4G8.10	usp101	gos1	snp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.031816664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771126	2542461	2540836	278922	277354	SPAC19A8.13	SPBC18H10.19	usp101	vps38	snp1	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.412722438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771127	2542461	2539527	278922	276089	SPAC19A8.13	SPCC338.16	usp101	pof3	snp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.50604999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771128	2543106	2542895	279538	279339	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC13G6.10c	SPAC3A11.13	asl1	SPAC3H5.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.463767389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771129	2543106	2542577	279538	279033	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC19G12.15c	SPAC3A11.13	tpp1	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.502813591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771130	2543106	2540833	279538	277351	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC18H10.20c	SPAC3A11.13	any1	SPAC3H5.02	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04252299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771131	2543106	2543637	279538	280051	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC3H8.02	SPAC3A11.13	csr102	SPAC3H5.02	SPAC3H8.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101009583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771132	2543106	2541513	279538	278014	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC227.13c	SPAC3A11.13	isu1	SPAC3H5.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813803072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771133	2543106	2541818	279538	278309	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC11G7.02	SPAC3A11.13	pub1	SPAC3H5.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.463956522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771134	2543106	2541621	279538	278118	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC29A4.17c	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC29A4.17c	SPAC3H5.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.463123411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771135	2543106	2543201	279538	279630	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC3F10.15c	SPAC3A11.13	spo12	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.859728247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771136	2543106	2540686	279538	277211	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC3A11.13	bdc1	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.678227086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771137	2543106	2540999	279538	277515	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC3H5.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.167567619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771138	2543106	2542023	279538	278506	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC3A11.13	ufd2	SPAC3H5.02	SPAC145.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.657353038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771139	2543106	2539792	279538	276342	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC1271.14	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC1271.14	SPAC3H5.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928405267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771140	2543106	2540595	279538	277121	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC21C3.02c	SPAC3A11.13	dep1	SPAC3H5.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866824435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771141	2543106	2542649	279538	279103	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC24C9.14	SPAC3A11.13	otu1	SPAC3H5.02	mug141	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.566663135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771142	2543106	2539352	279538	275918	SPAC3A11.13	SPCC188.07	SPAC3A11.13	ccq1	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.432126209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771143	2543106	2540893	279538	277409	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC543.10	SPAC3A11.13	get1	SPAC3H5.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813452837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771144	2543106	2540964	279538	277480	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC365.16	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC365.16	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639682994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771145	2543106	2542033	279538	278515	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC2C4.09	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC2C4.09	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636899186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771146	2543106	3361461	279538	280537	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC11H11.01	SPAC3A11.13	sst6	SPAC3H5.02	cps23	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.626885236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771147	2543106	2542499	279538	278958	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC1F12.04c	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC1F12.04c	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.92322444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771148	2543106	2540241	279538	276773	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC32H8.11	SPAC3A11.13	mei4	SPAC3H5.02	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990805621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771149	2543106	2539733	279538	276285	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC3A11.13	pab2	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.163822566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771150	2543106	2540673	279538	277198	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC3A11.13	mug80	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.595884274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771151	2543106	2541889	279538	278379	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC3A11.13	pom1	SPAC3H5.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991696894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771152	2543106	2540886	279538	277403	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC4F6.10	SPAC3A11.13	vps901	SPAC3H5.02	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.676933901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771153	2543106	2542873	279538	279318	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC9G1.02	SPAC3A11.13	wis4	SPAC3H5.02	wak1|wik1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.406714068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771154	2543106	2541532	279538	278032	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC2C4.15c	SPAC3A11.13	ubx2	SPAC3H5.02	ucp13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.023448306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771155	2543106	2540086	279538	276624	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC16H5.12c	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC16H5.12c	SPAC3H5.02	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.206156852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771156	2543106	2542902	279538	279346	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC144.05	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC144.05	SPAC3H5.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.843062861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771157	2543106	2542126	279538	278602	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC3A11.13	not3	SPAC3H5.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.611667065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771158	2543106	2538774	279538	275356	SPAC3A11.13	SPCC162.06c	SPAC3A11.13	SPCC162.06c	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844785581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771159	2543106	2541828	279538	278319	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC22H12.05c	SPAC3A11.13	fsc1	SPAC3H5.02	SPAC22H12.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.850583267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771160	2543106	2542946	279538	279386	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC6F12.03c	SPAC3A11.13	fsv1	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.63087752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771161	2543106	2540751	279538	277273	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC20F10.10	SPAC3A11.13	psl1	SPAC3H5.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.944299769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771162	2543106	2539974	279538	276518	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC32H8.07	SPAC3A11.13	git5	SPAC3H5.02	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982115539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771163	2543106	2540836	279538	277354	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC18H10.19	SPAC3A11.13	vps38	SPAC3H5.02	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.438615248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771164	2543106	2542254	279538	278724	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC30D11.04c	SPAC3A11.13	nup124	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578512693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771165	2543106	2539368	279538	275934	SPAC3A11.13	SPCC16A11.07	SPAC3A11.13	coq10	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9856835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771166	2543106	2541708	279538	278203	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC31A2.02	SPAC3A11.13	trm112	SPAC3H5.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984075824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771167	2543106	2540967	279538	277483	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC3H5.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.879174189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771168	2543106	2541410	279538	277918	SPAC3A11.13	SPBPB2B2.17c	SPAC3A11.13	SPBPB2B2.17c	SPAC3H5.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875867195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771169	2543106	2540599	279538	277125	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC29A3.10c	SPAC3A11.13	atp14	SPAC3H5.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.150362091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771170	2543106	2540184	279538	276717	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC106.12c	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC106.12c	SPAC3H5.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.512561213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771171	2543106	2540533	279538	277061	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC29A10.16c	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC29A10.16c	SPAC3H5.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.457761893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771172	2543106	2539519	279538	276081	SPAC3A11.13	SPCC364.05	SPAC3A11.13	vps3	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443448789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771173	2543106	2541742	279538	278236	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC22H10.09	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC22H10.09	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.450277515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771174	2543106	2541896	279538	278386	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC23H4.16c	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC23H4.16c	SPAC3H5.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.020743391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771175	2543106	2541713	279538	278208	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC3A11.13	atp11	SPAC3H5.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.859568407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771176	2543106	2539908	279538	276454	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC13E7.06	SPAC3A11.13	msd1	SPAC3H5.02	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.743847984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771177	2543106	2539809	279538	276359	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC16E9.02c	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC16E9.02c	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.617841402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771178	2543106	2543628	279538	280042	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC3H8.10	SPAC3A11.13	spo20	SPAC3H5.02	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.261293934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771179	2543106	2542881	279538	279326	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC13F5.03c	SPAC3A11.13	gld1	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.115994666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771180	2543106	2539030	279538	275603	SPAC3A11.13	SPCP1E11.02	SPAC3A11.13	ppk38	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.37887929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771181	2543106	2540800	279538	277319	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC409.20c	SPAC3A11.13	psh3	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.556590771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771182	2543106	2538966	279538	275540	SPAC3A11.13	SPCC18.10	SPAC3A11.13	SPCC18.10	SPAC3H5.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.842220463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771183	2543106	2540464	279538	276992	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC23E6.02	SPAC3A11.13	rrp2	SPAC3H5.02	SPBC23E6.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642209945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771184	2543106	2543096	279538	279528	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC977.05c	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC977.05c	SPAC3H5.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.818784482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771185	2543106	2539707	279538	276260	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC17F3.01c	SPAC3A11.13	rga5	SPAC3H5.02	SPBC557.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.267140997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771186	2543106	2540725	279538	277248	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC215.14c	SPAC3A11.13	vps20	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.631134488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771187	2543106	2541531	279538	278031	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3A11.13	fft3	SPAC3H5.02	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714665062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771188	2543106	2539729	279538	276281	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC11B10.07c	SPAC3A11.13	ivn1	SPAC3H5.02	pi004|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.69915255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771189	2543106	2542222	279538	278695	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC3A11.13	sde2	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569710509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771190	2543106	2542091	279538	278568	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC7D4.02c	SPAC3A11.13	sfp47	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703165584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771191	2543106	2539928	279538	276472	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC3A11.13	imp1	SPAC3H5.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.267909803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771192	2543106	2539205	279538	275775	SPAC3A11.13	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC3A11.13	mid1	SPAC3H5.02	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.354245629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771193	2543106	2542716	279538	279169	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC25H1.07	SPAC3A11.13	emc1	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.990435981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771194	2543106	2540828	279538	277346	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC4B4.06	SPAC3A11.13	vps25	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.534111464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771195	2543106	2543372	279538	279794	SPAC3A11.13	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC3A11.13	ase1	SPAC3H5.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.769066367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771196	2543106	2538834	279538	275415	SPAC3A11.13	SPCC126.08c	SPAC3A11.13	SPCC126.08c	SPAC3H5.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818043738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771197	2543027	2540649	279463	277174	SPAC110.03	SPBC19F8.08	cdc42	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.05047832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771198	2540121	2542569	276658	279025	SPBC119.14	SPAC186.08c	rti1	SPAC186.08c	rad22B	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775587163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771199	2540121	2542311	276658	278777	SPBC119.14	SPAC16A10.05c	rti1	dad1	rad22B	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.250242154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771200	2540121	2539845	276658	276393	SPBC119.14	SPBC12C2.02c	rti1	ste20	rad22B	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.37757356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771201	2540121	2542699	276658	279152	SPBC119.14	SPAC5H10.07	rti1	SPAC5H10.07	rad22B	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378967764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771202	2540121	2541746	276658	278240	SPBC119.14	SPAC20G4.04c	rti1	hus1	rad22B	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.352039458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771203	2541663	2539050	278159	275623	SPAC22G7.08	SPCC11E10.08	ppk8	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.423403947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771204	2541663	2540535	278159	277062	SPAC22G7.08	SPBC215.01	ppk8	SPBC215.01	-	SPBC3B9.20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321827247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771205	2541663	2541026	278159	277541	SPAC22G7.08	SPBC337.09	ppk8	erg28	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931890089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771206	2541663	2542555	278159	279012	SPAC22G7.08	SPAC1952.06c	ppk8	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.511214666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771207	2541663	2541045	278159	277560	SPAC22G7.08	SPBC543.03c	ppk8	pku80	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.802449621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771208	2541663	2541004	278159	277519	SPAC22G7.08	SPBC3F6.01c	ppk8	SPBC3F6.01c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.463350576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771209	2541663	2543593	278159	280008	SPAC22G7.08	SPAC4G9.10	ppk8	arg3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.61473123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771210	2541663	2539845	278159	276393	SPAC22G7.08	SPBC12C2.02c	ppk8	ste20	-	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775849232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771211	2541663	2541496	278159	277998	SPAC22G7.08	SPAC23D3.09	ppk8	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.012670925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771212	2541663	2542519	278159	278977	SPAC22G7.08	SPAC19G12.08	ppk8	scs7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986566453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771213	2541663	2539424	278159	275989	SPAC22G7.08	SPCC622.19	ppk8	jmj4	-	mug149	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.940753126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771214	2541663	2541614	278159	278111	SPAC22G7.08	SPAC29A4.20	ppk8	elp3	-	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.561725479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771215	2541663	2541713	278159	278208	SPAC22G7.08	SPAC3A12.12	ppk8	atp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.092212291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771216	2541663	2543663	278159	280077	SPAC22G7.08	SPAC644.07	ppk8	SPAC644.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923965856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771217	2541663	2540829	278159	277347	SPAC22G7.08	SPBC800.09	ppk8	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.434609733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771218	2541663	2542059	278159	278537	SPAC22G7.08	SPAC328.06	ppk8	ubp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.355518174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771219	2541663	2539767	278159	276318	SPAC22G7.08	SPBC1703.06	ppk8	pof10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.946089732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771220	2541663	2543387	278159	279809	SPAC22G7.08	SPAPB1E7.02c	ppk8	mcl1	-	slr3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.072080243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771221	2541663	2540558	278159	277085	SPAC22G7.08	SPBC2D10.17	ppk8	clr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.133909029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771222	2543567	2540279	279983	276810	SPAC890.03	SPBC3B8.04c	ppk16	SPBC3B8.04c	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.403741352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771223	2543567	2541475	279983	277977	SPAC890.03	SPAC24B11.09	ppk16	mpc2	mug92	SPAC24B11.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.344780094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771224	2543567	2540060	279983	276598	SPAC890.03	SPBC106.01	ppk16	mph1	mug92	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.672072646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771225	2543567	2540235	279983	276767	SPAC890.03	SPBC336.13c	ppk16	SPBC336.13c	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098071918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771226	2543567	2543655	279983	280069	SPAC890.03	SPAC9.08c	ppk16	SPAC9.08c	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.922368375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771227	2543567	2541426	279983	277931	SPAC890.03	SPAC227.06	ppk16	SPAC227.06	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03628128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771228	2543567	2540026	279983	276570	SPAC890.03	SPBC16D10.08c	ppk16	hsp104	mug92	SPBC16D10.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871940248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771229	2543567	2538977	279983	275551	SPAC890.03	SPCC1020.06c	ppk16	tal1	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872180499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771230	2543567	2542671	279983	279124	SPAC890.03	SPAC824.09c	ppk16	SPAC824.09c	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.401097579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771231	2543567	2540653	279983	277178	SPAC890.03	SPBC215.07c	ppk16	SPBC215.07c	mug92	pdp2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.508092424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771232	2543567	2540131	279983	276668	SPAC890.03	SPBC1778.05c	ppk16	SPBC1778.05c	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039736323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771233	2543567	2539202	279983	275773	SPAC890.03	SPCC162.10	ppk16	ppk33	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931690616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771234	2543567	2541130	279983	277645	SPAC890.03	SPBC776.11	ppk16	rpl2801	mug92	rpl28-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.919227117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771235	2543567	2540410	279983	276938	SPAC890.03	SPBC2D10.04	ppk16	SPBC2D10.04	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.924178504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771236	2543567	2542701	279983	279154	SPAC890.03	SPAC26H5.05	ppk16	mga2	mug92	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.062571531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771237	2543567	2540491	279983	277019	SPAC890.03	SPBC28E12.04	ppk16	SPBC28E12.04	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.259823017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771238	2543567	2540375	279983	276904	SPAC890.03	SPBC2G2.06c	ppk16	apl1	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.175627637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771239	2543567	2539332	279983	275898	SPAC890.03	SPCPB1C11.01	ppk16	amt1	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094789531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771240	2543567	2539420	279983	275985	SPAC890.03	SPCC970.07c	ppk16	raf2	mug92	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.182017372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771241	2543567	2541205	279983	277719	SPAC890.03	SPBC839.02	ppk16	SPBC839.02	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.609863617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771242	2543567	2539564	279983	276125	SPAC890.03	SPCC550.12	ppk16	arp6	mug92	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.986362552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771243	2543567	2543681	279983	280095	SPAC890.03	SPAC9.02c	ppk16	SPAC9.02c	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979965394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771244	2543567	2541046	279983	277561	SPAC890.03	SPBC365.01	ppk16	crs103	mug92	SPBC365.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987969979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771245	2543567	2539606	279983	276164	SPAC890.03	SPBC15D4.05	ppk16	SPBC15D4.05	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.410221591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771246	2543567	2539331	279983	275897	SPAC890.03	SPCC24B10.09	ppk16	rps1702	mug92	rps17|rps17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.915643427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771247	2543567	2540313	279983	276843	SPAC890.03	SPBC337.04	ppk16	ppk27	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820419034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771248	2543567	2540929	279983	277445	SPAC890.03	SPBC354.03	ppk16	swd3	mug92	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512113847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771249	2543567	3361385	279983	280461	SPAC890.03	SPAC1639.02c	ppk16	trk2	mug92	SPAC1F5.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.825093723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771250	2543567	2541045	279983	277560	SPAC890.03	SPBC543.03c	ppk16	pku80	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200793459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771251	2543567	2542135	279983	278611	SPAC890.03	SPAC13A11.04c	ppk16	ubp8	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.86609916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771252	2543567	2542318	279983	278784	SPAC890.03	SPAC16C9.05	ppk16	cph1	mug92	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.482126167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771253	2543567	2542246	279983	278716	SPAC890.03	SPAC17H9.12c	ppk16	SPAC17H9.12c	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87298684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771254	2543567	2538866	279983	275446	SPAC890.03	SPCC1620.12c	ppk16	SPCC1620.12c	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868130003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771255	2543567	2543292	279983	279717	SPAC890.03	SPAC6C3.02c	ppk16	SPAC6C3.02c	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922228394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771256	2543567	2538972	279983	275546	SPAC890.03	SPCC1739.15	ppk16	wtf21	mug92	wtf3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929219369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771257	2543567	2540825	279983	277343	SPAC890.03	SPBC428.08c	ppk16	clr4	mug92	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.780352595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771258	2543567	2539003	279983	275577	SPAC890.03	SPCC1442.17c	ppk16	ist1	mug92	SPCC285.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.408081661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771259	2543567	2539870	279983	276416	SPAC890.03	SPBC1709.18	ppk16	tif452	mug92	SPBC409.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.44157866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771260	2543567	2540894	279983	277410	SPAC890.03	SPBC530.04	ppk16	mod5	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093175418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771261	2543567	2538770	279983	275353	SPAC890.03	SPCC1753.02c	ppk16	git3	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.766423338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771262	2543567	2539628	279983	276185	SPAC890.03	SPBC1604.03c	ppk16	SPBC1604.03c	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.336867145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771263	2543567	2540348	279983	276877	SPAC890.03	SPBC29A10.05	ppk16	exo1	mug92	mut2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.840898664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771264	2543567	2541038	279983	277553	SPAC890.03	SPBC29A10.01	ppk16	ccr1	mug92	SPBC365.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321370651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771265	2543567	2541892	279983	278382	SPAC890.03	SPAP27G11.02	ppk16	SPAP27G11.02	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194181518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771266	2543567	2539754	279983	276306	SPAC890.03	SPBC16C6.04	ppk16	dbl6	mug92	SPBC16C6.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987355503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771267	2543567	2539898	279983	276444	SPAC890.03	SPBC12D12.07c	ppk16	trx2	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.713814469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771268	2543567	2541578	279983	278075	SPAC890.03	SPAC25B8.05	ppk16	deg1	mug92	SPAC25B8.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096451087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771269	2543567	2542469	279983	278930	SPAC890.03	SPAC19A8.04	ppk16	erg5	mug92	cyp61	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.890709454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771270	2543567	2541183	279983	277697	SPAC890.03	SPBC725.14	ppk16	arg6	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.769170396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771271	2543567	2543643	279983	280057	SPAC890.03	SPAC3G9.07c	ppk16	hos2	mug92	hda1|phd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.889297318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771272	2543567	2540801	279983	277320	SPAC890.03	SPBC18H10.10c	ppk16	saf4	mug92	cwc16|cwf16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.765104544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771273	2543567	2540665	279983	277190	SPAC890.03	SPBC83.02c	ppk16	rpl4302	mug92	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454234413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771274	2543567	2541828	279983	278319	SPAC890.03	SPAC22H12.05c	ppk16	fsc1	mug92	SPAC22H12.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820532294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771275	2543567	2539974	279983	276518	SPAC890.03	SPBC32H8.07	ppk16	git5	mug92	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.177802156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771276	2543567	2541542	279983	278042	SPAC890.03	SPAC4G9.02	ppk16	rnh201	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.850688149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771277	2543567	2541720	279983	278214	SPAC890.03	SPAC23H3.13c	ppk16	gpa2	mug92	git8	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.031906882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771278	2543567	2540394	279983	276922	SPAC890.03	SPBC2D10.09	ppk16	snr1	mug92	SPBC2D10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.288436918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771279	2543567	2540077	279983	276615	SPAC890.03	SPBC17D11.04c	ppk16	nto1	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.359163308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771280	2543567	2539958	279983	276502	SPAC890.03	SPBC1718.07c	ppk16	zfs1	mug92	moc4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.815076339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771281	2543567	2543105	279983	279537	SPAC890.03	SPAC343.10	ppk16	met11	mug92	mthfr2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925831637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771282	2543567	2541009	279983	277524	SPAC890.03	SPBC428.04	ppk16	apq12	mug92	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.500305633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771283	2543567	2543080	279983	279513	SPAC890.03	SPAC3A11.10c	ppk16	SPAC3A11.10c	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.76299581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771284	2543567	2543119	279983	279551	SPAC890.03	SPAC3A11.07	ppk16	nde2	mug92	SPAC3A11.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.567952602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771285	2543567	2539368	279983	275934	SPAC890.03	SPCC16A11.07	ppk16	coq10	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.333585501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771286	2543567	2538708	279983	275292	SPAC890.03	SPCC594.01	ppk16	SPCC594.01	mug92	SPCC736.16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.924079311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771287	2543567	2541395	279983	277904	SPAC890.03	SPBP8B7.25	ppk16	cyp4	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.160388646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771288	2543567	2539303	279983	275871	SPAC890.03	SPCC1020.09	ppk16	gnr1	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.028851011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771289	2543567	2541266	279983	277780	SPAC890.03	SPBP16F5.05c	ppk16	yar1	mug92	SPBP16F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642349569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771290	2543567	2540882	279983	277399	SPAC890.03	SPBC4F6.08c	ppk16	mrpl39	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205249928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771291	2543567	2539711	279983	276264	SPAC890.03	SPBC1683.09c	ppk16	frp1	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.928752652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771292	2543567	2538884	279983	275462	SPAC890.03	SPCC1393.08	ppk16	SPCC1393.08	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041101898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771293	2543567	3361105	279983	280181	SPAC890.03	SPCC188.10c	ppk16	SPCC188.10c	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.768388679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771294	2543567	2541742	279983	278236	SPAC890.03	SPAC22H10.09	ppk16	SPAC22H10.09	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.814505855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771295	2543567	2538848	279983	275429	SPAC890.03	SPCC613.12c	ppk16	raf1	mug92	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.399695958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771296	2543567	3361520	279983	280596	SPAC890.03	SPAC1610.02c	ppk16	SPAC1610.02c	mug92	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443365091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771297	2543567	2538907	279983	275484	SPAC890.03	SPCC24B10.19c	ppk16	nts1	mug92	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095177649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771298	2543567	2541798	279983	278289	SPAC890.03	SPAC22F3.03c	ppk16	rdh54	mug92	mug34|tid1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.936082412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771299	2543567	2543391	279983	279813	SPAC890.03	SPAC4G9.09c	ppk16	arg11	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.458328265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771300	2543567	2541370	279983	277881	SPAC890.03	SPBP8B7.07c	ppk16	set6	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.158434398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771301	2543567	2540619	279983	277145	SPAC890.03	SPBC25H2.15	ppk16	SPBC25H2.15	mug92	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.768505803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771302	2543567	2542767	279983	279217	SPAC890.03	SPAC1565.07c	ppk16	knd1	mug92	SPAC1565.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.478917182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771303	2543567	2543071	279983	279504	SPAC890.03	SPAC3C7.06c	ppk16	pit1	mug92	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.093445369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771304	2543567	2539925	279983	276469	SPAC890.03	SPBC16H5.13	ppk16	SPBC16H5.13	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.029255344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771305	2543567	2540152	279983	276688	SPAC890.03	SPBC12C2.03c	ppk16	SPBC12C2.03c	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196908133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771306	2543567	2543304	279983	279728	SPAC890.03	SPAC6B12.12	ppk16	tom70	mug92	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049819544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771307	2543567	2541279	279983	277792	SPAC890.03	SPBC8E4.03	ppk16	SPBC8E4.03	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.664420353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771308	2543567	2540891	279983	277407	SPAC890.03	SPBC582.08	ppk16	SPBC582.08	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.823743578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771309	2543567	2540829	279983	277347	SPAC890.03	SPBC800.09	ppk16	sum2	mug92	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442022519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771310	2543567	2539136	279983	275708	SPAC890.03	SPCC1919.05	ppk16	SPCC1919.05	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.940054758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771311	2543567	2541797	279983	278288	SPAC890.03	SPAC22F3.04	ppk16	mug62	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.270570083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771312	2543567	2541229	279983	277743	SPAC890.03	SPBC839.05c	ppk16	rps1701	mug92	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.839204729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771313	2543567	3361329	279983	280405	SPAC890.03	SPBC25H2.10c	ppk16	SPBC25H2.10c	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867508374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771314	2543567	2539188	279983	275759	SPAC890.03	SPCC1827.04	ppk16	vms1	mug92	SPCC1827.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095786118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771315	2543567	2541789	279983	278281	SPAC890.03	SPAC23H4.08	ppk16	iwr1	mug92	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.173644132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771316	2543567	2540202	279983	276735	SPAC890.03	SPBC16G5.09	ppk16	SPBC16G5.09	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.806983353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771317	2543567	2540928	279983	277444	SPAC890.03	SPBC3E7.10	ppk16	fma1	mug92	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.062643488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771318	2543567	2543046	279983	279481	SPAC890.03	SPAC3C7.10	ppk16	pex13	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.874224697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771319	2543567	2539205	279983	275775	SPAC890.03	SPCC4B3.15	ppk16	mid1	mug92	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640609275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771320	2543567	2540140	279983	276677	SPAC890.03	SPBC16C6.08c	ppk16	qcr6	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145682243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771321	2543567	2539189	279983	275760	SPAC890.03	SPCC1682.16	ppk16	rpt4	mug92	SPCC306.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.41353605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771322	2543567	2542059	279983	278537	SPAC890.03	SPAC328.06	ppk16	ubp2	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.025878772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771323	2543567	2541946	279983	278433	SPAC890.03	SPAC2G11.04	ppk16	SPAC2G11.04	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.027711001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771324	2543567	2539169	279983	275740	SPAC890.03	SPCC1235.11	ppk16	mpc1	mug92	SPCC1235.11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86850842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771325	2543567	2538861	279983	275441	SPAC890.03	SPCC1620.11	ppk16	nup97	mug92	mug87	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934760799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771326	2543567	2541806	279983	278297	SPAC890.03	SPAC4G8.13c	ppk16	prz1	mug92	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.045800931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771327	2543567	2543471	279983	279891	SPAC890.03	SPAC513.07	ppk16	SPAC513.07	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.129027653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771328	2543567	2539128	279983	275700	SPAC890.03	SPCC1682.06	ppk16	SPCC1682.06	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.720620699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771329	2543567	2540360	279983	276889	SPAC890.03	SPBC2G5.01	ppk16	SPBC2G5.01	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979682096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771330	2543567	2542424	279983	278886	SPAC890.03	SPAC1805.14	ppk16	SPAC1805.14	mug92	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632877226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771331	2543567	2541050	279983	277565	SPAC890.03	SPBC428.05c	ppk16	arg12	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.456447211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771332	2543567	2541808	279983	278299	SPAC890.03	SPAC22A12.14c	ppk16	SPAC22A12.14c	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820812852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771333	2543567	2543372	279983	279794	SPAC890.03	SPAPB1A10.09	ppk16	ase1	mug92	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.40405958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771334	2543567	2540167	279983	276702	SPAC890.03	SPBC1683.04	ppk16	SPBC1683.04	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090604845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771335	2543567	2543333	279983	279756	SPAC890.03	SPAC694.02	ppk16	SPAC694.02	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931022127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771336	2543567	2541080	279983	277595	SPAC890.03	SPBC557.04	ppk16	ppk29	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.867924708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771337	2543567	2541177	279983	277691	SPAC890.03	SPBC725.05c	ppk16	SPBC725.05c	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.665996122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771338	2543567	2541576	279983	278073	SPAC890.03	SPBC1348.02	ppk16	SPBC1348.02	mug92	SPAC1348.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922131361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771339	2543567	2543501	279983	279919	SPAC890.03	SPAC664.14	ppk16	amt2	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925925691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771340	2543567	2539148	279983	275720	SPAC890.03	SPCC132.04c	ppk16	gdh2	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.233149346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771341	2543567	2539494	279983	276057	SPAC890.03	SPCC4G3.08	ppk16	psk1	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.10358226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771342	2543567	2542836	279983	279282	SPAC890.03	SPAC13G7.06	ppk16	met16	mug92	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.614209572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771343	2543567	2539033	279983	275606	SPAC890.03	SPCC1450.07c	ppk16	dao1	mug92	SPCC1450.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984205568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771344	2538855	2543529	275436	279947	SPCC1183.06	SPAC4C5.02c	ung1	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.843851694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771345	2538855	2541426	275436	277931	SPCC1183.06	SPAC227.06	ung1	SPAC227.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.119576824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771346	2538855	2540745	275436	277268	SPCC1183.06	SPBC21C3.18	ung1	spo4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577345642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771347	2538855	2541416	275436	277923	SPCC1183.06	SPBCPT2R1.01c	ung1	SPBCPT2R1.01c	-	SPBPB2B2.20c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868236168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771348	2538855	2540893	275436	277409	SPCC1183.06	SPBC543.10	ung1	get1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.130995841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771349	2538855	2542499	275436	278958	SPCC1183.06	SPAC1F12.04c	ung1	SPAC1F12.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.39089338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771350	2538855	2542519	275436	278977	SPCC1183.06	SPAC19G12.08	ung1	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.882342607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771351	2538855	2542401	275436	278865	SPCC1183.06	SPAC1142.02c	ung1	SPAC1142.02c	-	SPAC17G6.19c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779592335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771352	2538855	2540800	275436	277319	SPCC1183.06	SPBC409.20c	ung1	psh3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193206749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771353	2538855	2542306	275436	278773	SPCC1183.06	SPAC29A4.11	ung1	rga3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642156499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771354	2538855	2539702	275436	276255	SPCC1183.06	SPBC1604.12	ung1	SPBC1604.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.282168559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771355	2541456	2538939	277959	275514	SPAC6G9.04	SPCC1672.04c	spo7	SPCC1672.04c	mug79	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634893217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771356	2541456	2539774	277959	276325	SPAC6G9.04	SPBC17A3.10	spo7	pas4	mug79	pi036	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934797183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771357	2538775	2542207	275357	278682	SPCC23B6.05c	SPAC17H9.10c	ssb3	ddb1	rpa3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.644824201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771358	2538775	2540279	275357	276810	SPCC23B6.05c	SPBC3B8.04c	ssb3	SPBC3B8.04c	rpa3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81704769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771359	2538775	2541135	275357	277650	SPCC23B6.05c	SPBC839.03c	ssb3	SPBC839.03c	rpa3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.951910768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771360	2538775	2539944	275357	276488	SPCC23B6.05c	SPBC1198.06c	ssb3	SPBC1198.06c	rpa3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935789151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771361	2538775	2540664	275357	277189	SPCC23B6.05c	SPBC215.02	ssb3	bob1	rpa3	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.893941595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771362	2538775	2538847	275357	275428	SPCC23B6.05c	SPCC594.06c	ssb3	SPCC594.06c	rpa3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.123410248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771363	2538775	2542273	275357	278742	SPCC23B6.05c	SPAC17H9.13c	ssb3	SPAC17H9.13c	rpa3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.852416721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771364	2538775	2540945	275357	277461	SPCC23B6.05c	SPBC342.06c	ssb3	rtt109	rpa3	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.687983976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771365	2538775	2542318	275357	278784	SPCC23B6.05c	SPAC16C9.05	ssb3	cph1	rpa3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.419511475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771366	2538775	2540467	275357	276995	SPCC23B6.05c	SPBC2G2.07c	ssb3	mug178	rpa3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874389059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771367	2538775	2541643	275357	278139	SPCC23B6.05c	SPAC14C4.13	ssb3	rad17	rpa3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.478836161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771368	2538775	2542558	275357	279014	SPCC23B6.05c	SPAC1952.07	ssb3	rad1	rpa3	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.587772304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771369	2538775	2541021	275357	277536	SPCC23B6.05c	SPBC3B8.10c	ssb3	nem1	rpa3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.19958017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771370	2538775	2542036	275357	278518	SPCC23B6.05c	SPAC23A1.19c	ssb3	hrq1	rpa3	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.22339774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771371	2538775	2540352	275357	276881	SPCC23B6.05c	SPBC215.03c	ssb3	csn1	rpa3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.534429561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771372	2538775	2540418	275357	276946	SPCC23B6.05c	SPBC27.05	ssb3	SPBC27.05	rpa3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389297271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771373	2538775	2542032	275357	278514	SPCC23B6.05c	SPAC23C11.04c	ssb3	pnk1	rpa3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.019175434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771374	2538775	2541542	275357	278042	SPCC23B6.05c	SPAC4G9.02	ssb3	rnh201	rpa3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.334848302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771375	2538775	2543495	275357	279914	SPCC23B6.05c	SPAC513.03	ssb3	mfm2	rpa3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.986318372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771376	2538775	2542773	275357	279222	SPCC23B6.05c	SPAC16.01	ssb3	rho2	rpa3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986632412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771377	2538775	2541378	275357	277889	SPCC23B6.05c	SPBP8B7.21	ssb3	ubp3	rpa3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.243631639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771378	2538775	2538848	275357	275429	SPCC23B6.05c	SPCC613.12c	ssb3	raf1	rpa3	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.200470602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771379	2538775	2541713	275357	278208	SPCC23B6.05c	SPAC3A12.12	ssb3	atp11	rpa3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.851777277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771380	2538775	2538762	275357	275345	SPCC23B6.05c	SPCC306.04c	ssb3	set1	rpa3	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.720387373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771381	2538775	2543670	275357	280084	SPCC23B6.05c	SPAPB1E7.06c	ssb3	eme1	rpa3	mms4|slx2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992468598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771382	2538775	2541531	275357	278031	SPCC23B6.05c	SPAC25A8.01c	ssb3	fft3	rpa3	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636169691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771383	2538775	2542418	275357	278881	SPCC23B6.05c	SPAC1805.07c	ssb3	dad2	rpa3	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321715189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771384	2538775	2539668	275357	276223	SPCC23B6.05c	SPBC11B10.10c	ssb3	pht1	rpa3	pi001	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.080202533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771385	2538775	2540936	275357	277452	SPCC23B6.05c	SPBC800.05c	ssb3	atb2	rpa3	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049823078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771386	2538775	2539375	275357	275941	SPCC23B6.05c	SPCC4G3.11	ssb3	mug154	rpa3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.024644217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771387	2538775	2543387	275357	279809	SPCC23B6.05c	SPAPB1E7.02c	ssb3	mcl1	rpa3	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.502955364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771388	2538775	2540314	275357	276844	SPCC23B6.05c	SPBC2G5.03	ssb3	ctu1	rpa3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.990486305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771389	2543008	2540068	279446	276606	SPAC12B10.13	SPBC1734.12c	SPAC12B10.13	alg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633086448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771390	2543008	2541117	279446	277632	SPAC12B10.13	SPBC646.13	SPAC12B10.13	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.333242077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771391	2543008	2542614	279446	279068	SPAC12B10.13	SPAC1399.04c	SPAC12B10.13	SPAC1399.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.445731896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771392	2543008	2539564	279446	276125	SPAC12B10.13	SPCC550.12	SPAC12B10.13	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039406851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771393	2543008	2542724	279446	279175	SPAC12B10.13	SPAC767.01c	SPAC12B10.13	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.683086732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771394	2543008	2541323	279446	277835	SPAC12B10.13	SPBP35G2.14	SPAC12B10.13	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442080431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771395	2543008	2540595	279446	277121	SPAC12B10.13	SPBC21C3.02c	SPAC12B10.13	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.570561027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771396	2543008	2541021	279446	277536	SPAC12B10.13	SPBC3B8.10c	SPAC12B10.13	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572058321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771397	2543008	2543020	279446	279456	SPAC12B10.13	SPAC10F6.13c	SPAC12B10.13	SPAC10F6.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.764318417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771398	2543008	2541249	279446	277763	SPAC12B10.13	SPBC947.01	SPAC12B10.13	alf1	-	SPBC947.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510419682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771399	2543008	2541776	279446	278270	SPAC12B10.13	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC12B10.13	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700942899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771400	2543008	2540429	279446	276957	SPAC12B10.13	SPBC29A10.07	SPAC12B10.13	pom152	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807225292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771401	2543008	2541889	279446	278379	SPAC12B10.13	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC12B10.13	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.406272002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771402	2543008	2542168	279446	278643	SPAC12B10.13	SPAC17A5.16	SPAC12B10.13	ftp105	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.186078892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771403	2543008	2539603	279446	276161	SPAC12B10.13	SPBC1289.06c	SPAC12B10.13	ppr8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.406813398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771404	2543008	2540326	279446	276856	SPAC12B10.13	SPBC2G5.06c	SPAC12B10.13	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.980841038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771405	2543008	2539667	279446	276222	SPAC12B10.13	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC12B10.13	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.125179761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771406	2543008	2540997	279446	277513	SPAC12B10.13	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC12B10.13	pof9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444916276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771407	2543008	2540394	279446	276922	SPAC12B10.13	SPBC2D10.09	SPAC12B10.13	snr1	-	SPBC2D10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462880313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771408	2543008	2539715	279446	276268	SPAC12B10.13	SPBC1778.09	SPAC12B10.13	SPBC1778.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.057135794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771409	2543008	2542439	279446	278901	SPAC12B10.13	SPAC17A5.08	SPAC12B10.13	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.500281414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771410	2543008	2540967	279446	277483	SPAC12B10.13	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC12B10.13	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.316282213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771411	2543008	2542597	279446	279051	SPAC12B10.13	SPAP8A3.07c	SPAC12B10.13	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.943677041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771412	2543008	2541488	279446	277990	SPAC12B10.13	SPAC227.17c	SPAC12B10.13	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.504536028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771413	2543008	2542453	279446	278914	SPAC12B10.13	SPAC186.01	SPAC12B10.13	pfl9	-	SPAC186.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.882339014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771414	2543008	2539763	279446	276314	SPAC12B10.13	SPBC1861.05	SPAC12B10.13	SPBC1861.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09179264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771415	2543008	3361389	279446	280465	SPAC12B10.13	SPAC977.13c	SPAC12B10.13	SPAC977.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515480132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771416	2543008	2538762	279446	275345	SPAC12B10.13	SPCC306.04c	SPAC12B10.13	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.051968117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771417	2543008	2540498	279446	277026	SPAC12B10.13	SPBC27.02c	SPAC12B10.13	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64175831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771418	2543008	2543136	279446	279568	SPAC12B10.13	SPBC1348.07	SPAC12B10.13	SPBC1348.07	-	SPAC1348.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.333650797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771419	2543008	2542940	279446	279381	SPAC12B10.13	SPAC31A2.12	SPAC12B10.13	SPAC31A2.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701164678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771420	2543008	2539514	279446	276076	SPAC12B10.13	SPCC663.14c	SPAC12B10.13	trp663	-	SPCC663.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.121301019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771421	2543008	2542574	279446	279030	SPAC12B10.13	SPAC186.05c	SPAC12B10.13	SPAC186.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874821269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771422	2543008	2540787	279446	277306	SPAC12B10.13	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC12B10.13	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.621279637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771423	2541819	2540279	278310	276810	SPAC6G9.08	SPBC3B8.04c	ubp6	SPBC3B8.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.323470583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771424	2541819	2538796	278310	275377	SPAC6G9.08	SPCC63.06	ubp6	SPCC63.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503724855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771425	2541819	2540105	278310	276642	SPAC6G9.08	SPBC106.04	ubp6	ada1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807160548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771426	2541819	2542585	278310	279040	SPAC6G9.08	SPAC31A2.13c	ubp6	sft1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.263325264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771427	2541819	2540455	278310	276983	SPAC6G9.08	SPBC215.05	ubp6	gpd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.332484899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771428	2541819	3361375	278310	280451	SPAC6G9.08	SPAC212.06c	ubp6	SPAC212.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983726597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771429	2541819	2538847	278310	275428	SPAC6G9.08	SPCC594.06c	ubp6	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699646959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771430	2541819	2540727	278310	277250	SPAC6G9.08	SPBC1921.03c	ubp6	mex67	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.215637259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771431	2541819	2543685	278310	280099	SPAC6G9.08	SPAC3C7.03c	ubp6	rad55	-	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574189997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771432	2541819	2542791	278310	279240	SPAC6G9.08	SPAC167.04	ubp6	pam17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982526063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771433	2541819	2541021	278310	277536	SPAC6G9.08	SPBC3B8.10c	ubp6	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706148494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771434	2541819	2541801	278310	278292	SPAC6G9.08	SPAC2F7.08c	ubp6	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773844874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771435	2541819	2543009	278310	279447	SPAC6G9.08	SPAC10F6.06	ubp6	vip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.449742652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771436	2541819	3361526	278310	280602	SPAC6G9.08	SPAC664.15	ubp6	caf4	-	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.271147214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771437	2541819	2542992	278310	279430	SPAC6G9.08	SPAC1071.09c	ubp6	SPAC1071.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924571574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771438	2541819	2541175	278310	277689	SPAC6G9.08	SPBC839.13c	ubp6	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506536695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771439	2541819	2540498	278310	277026	SPAC6G9.08	SPBC27.02c	ubp6	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.265042361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771440	2541819	2543219	278310	279647	SPAC6G9.08	SPAC56F8.09	ubp6	rrp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842614043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771441	2541819	2539928	278310	276472	SPAC6G9.08	SPBC1604.08c	ubp6	imp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.80946274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771442	2541819	2542890	278310	279334	SPAC6G9.08	SPAC13G6.14	ubp6	aps1	-	SPAC24B11.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449879741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771443	2540929	2538939	277445	275514	SPBC354.03	SPCC1672.04c	swd3	SPCC1672.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.703050865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771444	2540929	2539788	277445	276338	SPBC354.03	SPBC17D1.02	swd3	dph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.132449975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771445	2540929	2539151	277445	275723	SPBC354.03	SPCC1235.12c	swd3	mug146	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097413979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771446	2540929	2538961	277445	275535	SPBC354.03	SPCC285.14	swd3	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.611303176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771447	2540929	2541971	277445	278456	SPBC354.03	SPAC27F1.05c	swd3	SPAC27F1.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328923059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771448	2540929	2539566	277445	276126	SPBC354.03	SPCC736.13	swd3	SPCC736.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.415403227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771449	2540929	2542378	277445	278842	SPBC354.03	SPAC1805.04	swd3	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.70613721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771450	2540929	2543592	277445	280007	SPBC354.03	SPAC4F10.18	swd3	nup37	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.123784161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771451	2540929	2540745	277445	277268	SPBC354.03	SPBC21C3.18	swd3	spo4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.820747768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771452	2540929	2541621	277445	278118	SPBC354.03	SPAC29A4.17c	swd3	SPAC29A4.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.662931442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771453	2540929	2538993	277445	275567	SPBC354.03	SPCC162.12	swd3	tco89	-	SPCC1753.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581349024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771454	2540929	2542237	277445	278709	SPBC354.03	SPAC19E9.02	swd3	fin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852852333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771455	2540929	3361561	277445	280637	SPBC354.03	SPAC11E3.01c	swd3	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.059509531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771456	2540929	2539939	277445	276483	SPBC354.03	SPBC11G11.01	swd3	fis1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.912557271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771457	2540929	2541853	277445	278344	SPBC354.03	SPAC2F3.11	swd3	SPAC2F3.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.195911781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771458	2540929	2540433	277445	276961	SPBC354.03	SPBC2D10.06	swd3	rep1	-	rec16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505056168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771459	2540929	2543479	277445	279899	SPBC354.03	SPAC688.04c	swd3	gst3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820818601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771460	2540929	2539800	277445	276350	SPBC354.03	SPBC1347.13c	swd3	mrm1	-	SPBC1347.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991657332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771461	2540929	2543680	277445	280094	SPBC354.03	SPAC4G9.20c	swd3	SPAC4G9.20c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.8737832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771462	2540929	2542103	277445	278579	SPBC354.03	SPAC31G5.11	swd3	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.26518371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771463	2540929	2540491	277445	277019	SPBC354.03	SPBC28E12.04	swd3	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632452919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771464	2540929	2540535	277445	277062	SPBC354.03	SPBC215.01	swd3	SPBC215.01	-	SPBC3B9.20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189919409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771465	2540929	2539208	277445	275778	SPBC354.03	SPCC1450.11c	swd3	cek1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.785266535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771466	2540929	2540999	277445	277515	SPBC354.03	SPBC4B4.04	swd3	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.190852896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771467	2540929	2538847	277445	275428	SPBC354.03	SPCC594.06c	swd3	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385236064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771468	2540929	2541471	277445	277973	SPBC354.03	SPAC1F5.03c	swd3	SPAC1F5.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2153576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771469	2540929	2541500	277445	278002	SPBC354.03	SPAC227.18	swd3	lys3	-	SPAC2F7.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.077342561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771470	2540929	2541682	277445	278178	SPBC354.03	SPAC15F9.02	swd3	seh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.384380582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771471	2540929	2539463	277445	276026	SPBC354.03	SPCC550.11	swd3	SPCC550.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.554927956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771472	2540929	2543230	277445	279658	SPBC354.03	SPAC823.13c	swd3	SPAC823.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503200464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771473	2540929	2539249	277445	275819	SPBC354.03	SPCC1450.05c	swd3	rox3	-	med19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.448668589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771474	2540929	2543453	277445	279873	SPBC354.03	SPAC3G9.03	swd3	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.839932083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771475	2540929	2539797	277445	276347	SPBC354.03	SPBC16G5.14c	swd3	rps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.494791628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771476	2540929	2539937	277445	276481	SPBC354.03	SPBC1539.08	swd3	arf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390673981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771477	2540929	2542135	277445	278611	SPBC354.03	SPAC13A11.04c	swd3	ubp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.257501214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771478	2540929	2542318	277445	278784	SPBC354.03	SPAC16C9.05	swd3	cph1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.846609394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771479	2540929	2542023	277445	278506	SPBC354.03	SPAC20H4.10	swd3	ufd2	-	SPAC145.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641317324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771480	2540929	2541527	277445	278027	SPBC354.03	SPAC31A2.09c	swd3	apm4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.550163588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771481	2540929	2542277	277445	278746	SPBC354.03	SPAC17A5.02c	swd3	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.617111402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771482	2540929	2543685	277445	280099	SPBC354.03	SPAC3C7.03c	swd3	rad55	-	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.743220252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771483	2540929	2539057	277445	275630	SPBC354.03	SPCC70.04c	swd3	SPCC70.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.838159479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771484	2540929	2543308	277445	279732	SPBC354.03	SPAC694.04c	swd3	SPAC694.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042393125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771485	2540929	2542220	277445	278694	SPBC354.03	SPAC1A6.03c	swd3	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.70164355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771486	2540929	2541923	277445	278411	SPBC354.03	SPAC23C4.09c	swd3	SPAC23C4.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.32410277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771487	2540929	2540540	277445	277067	SPBC354.03	SPBC23E6.10c	swd3	SPBC23E6.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.146198952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771488	2540929	3361316	277445	280392	SPBC354.03	SPBC2D10.03c	swd3	SPBC2D10.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.414037664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771489	2540929	2541522	277445	278023	SPBC354.03	SPAC23E2.01	swd3	fep1	-	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.509651704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771490	2540929	2543426	277445	279846	SPBC354.03	SPAC631.02	swd3	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.768808715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771491	2540929	2539352	277445	275918	SPBC354.03	SPCC188.07	swd3	ccq1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.953376851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771492	2540929	2538906	277445	275483	SPBC354.03	SPCC1259.03	swd3	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.834704353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771493	2540929	2541544	277445	278044	SPBC354.03	SPAC22G7.06c	swd3	ura1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987414553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771494	2540929	2541379	277445	277890	SPBC354.03	SPBP8B7.27	swd3	mug30	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.456501689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771495	2540929	2539467	277445	276030	SPBC354.03	SPCC417.07c	swd3	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.042007672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771496	2540929	2540906	277445	277422	SPBC354.03	SPBC365.20c	swd3	pnc1	-	SPBC557.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099680624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771497	2540929	2540312	277445	276842	SPBC354.03	SPBC31F10.08	swd3	mde2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.821029413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771498	2540929	2543135	277445	279567	SPBC354.03	SPAC869.06c	swd3	SPAC869.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.313059392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771499	2540929	2541741	277445	278235	SPBC354.03	SPAC20G4.02c	swd3	fus1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097467697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771500	2540929	2542177	277445	278652	SPBC354.03	SPAC17H9.08	swd3	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815230763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771501	2540929	2540631	277445	277157	SPBC354.03	SPBC25B2.10	swd3	SPBC25B2.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.617665405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771502	2540929	2542513	277445	278971	SPBC354.03	SPAC1952.05	swd3	gcn5	-	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.314747632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771503	2540929	2541776	277445	278270	SPBC354.03	SPAC23H3.05c	swd3	swd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.909690276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771504	2540929	2542105	277445	278581	SPBC354.03	SPAC14C4.15c	swd3	SPAC14C4.15c	-	SPAPJ760.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.876389965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771505	2540929	2543144	277445	279576	SPBC354.03	SPAC3F10.05c	swd3	mug113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.255015248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771506	2540929	2542707	277445	279160	SPBC354.03	SPAC25G10.03	swd3	zip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.38612805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771507	2540929	3361491	277445	280567	SPBC354.03	SPAC1805.08	swd3	dlc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.819802102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771508	2540929	2539984	277445	276528	SPBC354.03	SPBC1289.11	swd3	spf38	-	cwf17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326965365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771509	2540929	2542123	277445	278599	SPBC354.03	SPAC18G6.15	swd3	mal3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319241396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771510	2540929	2542507	277445	278965	SPBC354.03	SPAC18G6.13	swd3	SPAC18G6.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.991044532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771511	2540929	2541543	277445	278043	SPBC354.03	SPAC5H10.04	swd3	SPAC5H10.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852595404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771512	2540929	2543412	277445	279834	SPBC354.03	SPAC637.07	swd3	moe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.112667044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771513	2540929	2540396	277445	276924	SPBC354.03	SPBC31F10.12	swd3	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.373719777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771514	2540929	2540673	277445	277198	SPBC354.03	SPBC1D7.03	swd3	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.40821009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771515	2540929	2538800	277445	275381	SPBC354.03	SPCC1322.06	swd3	kap113	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987174329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771516	2540929	2542989	277445	279427	SPBC354.03	SPAC11E3.13c	swd3	gas5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575611715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771517	2540929	2542235	277445	278707	SPBC354.03	SPAC18G6.05c	swd3	SPAC18G6.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.768327222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771518	2540929	2541109	277445	277624	SPBC354.03	SPBC6B1.02	swd3	ppk30	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.303869655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771519	2540929	2539454	277445	276017	SPBC354.03	SPCC622.15c	swd3	SPCC622.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.210395427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771520	2540929	2541496	277445	277998	SPBC354.03	SPAC23D3.09	swd3	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.892448517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771521	2540929	2541532	277445	278032	SPBC354.03	SPAC2C4.15c	swd3	ubx2	-	ucp13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036386037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771522	2540929	2541899	277445	278389	SPBC354.03	SPAC22E12.11c	swd3	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.359043209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771523	2540929	2539233	277445	275803	SPBC354.03	SPCC16A11.03c	swd3	SPCC16A11.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.456508371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771524	2540929	2538890	277445	275468	SPBC354.03	SPCC1393.02c	swd3	spt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578146655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771525	2540929	2539111	277445	275683	SPBC354.03	SPCC417.11c	swd3	SPCC417.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.263214484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771526	2540929	2541710	277445	278205	SPBC354.03	SPAC343.11c	swd3	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.496927915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771527	2540929	2541351	277445	277862	SPBC354.03	SPBP4H10.14c	swd3	SPBP4H10.14c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816507072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771528	2540929	2539667	277445	276222	SPBC354.03	SPBC13G1.08c	swd3	ash2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096648504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771529	2540929	2540997	277445	277513	SPBC354.03	SPBC3H7.06c	swd3	pof9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440776873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771530	2540929	2542710	277445	279163	SPBC354.03	SPAC750.08c	swd3	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578787511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771531	2540929	2543389	277445	279811	SPBC354.03	SPAPB1A11.02	swd3	SPAPB1A11.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.403308041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771532	2540929	2538837	277445	275418	SPBC354.03	SPCC4B3.03c	swd3	SPCC4B3.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925839048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771533	2540929	2540675	277445	277200	SPBC354.03	SPBC21H7.07c	swd3	his5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981138262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771534	2540929	2540224	277445	276757	SPBC354.03	SPBC32H8.06	swd3	mug93	-	pi018|SPACTOKYO_453.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.744069368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771535	2540929	2540427	277445	276955	SPBC354.03	SPBC2A9.13	swd3	SPBC2A9.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.456094641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771536	2540929	2539524	277445	276086	SPBC354.03	SPCC70.02c	swd3	SPCC70.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149762919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771537	2540929	2540394	277445	276922	SPBC354.03	SPBC2D10.09	swd3	snr1	-	SPBC2D10.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380408163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771538	2540929	2540836	277445	277354	SPBC354.03	SPBC18H10.19	swd3	vps38	-	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442919821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771539	2540929	2543357	277445	279779	SPBC354.03	SPAC688.12c	swd3	SPAC688.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384927363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771540	2540929	2539232	277445	275802	SPBC354.03	SPCC1223.04c	swd3	set11	-	mug76	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.916291207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771541	2540929	2538935	277445	275511	SPBC354.03	SPCC1682.11c	swd3	ctl1	-	SPCC1682.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.410543324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771542	2540929	2542254	277445	278724	SPBC354.03	SPAC30D11.04c	swd3	nup124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.2484968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771543	2540929	2543234	277445	279662	SPBC354.03	SPAC977.11	swd3	SPAC977.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.987796446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771544	2540929	2543311	277445	279735	SPBC354.03	SPAC977.15	swd3	SPAC977.15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.275077603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771545	2540929	2539481	277445	276044	SPBC354.03	SPCC622.16c	swd3	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.176788737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771546	2540929	2540530	277445	277058	SPBC354.03	SPBC405.05	swd3	atg16	-	SPBC405.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865256382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771547	2540929	5802861	277445	857999	SPBC354.03	SPAC1D4.01	swd3	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.130749874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771548	2540929	2539715	277445	276268	SPBC354.03	SPBC1778.09	swd3	SPBC1778.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.463641472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771549	2540929	2543443	277445	279863	SPBC354.03	SPAC3H1.12c	swd3	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.859358323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771550	2540929	2539368	277445	275934	SPBC354.03	SPCC16A11.07	swd3	coq10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64044392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771551	2540929	2541536	277445	278036	SPBC354.03	SPAC1071.02	swd3	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.42608343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771552	2540929	2540342	277445	276871	SPBC354.03	SPBC2G2.01c	swd3	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197091146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771553	2540929	2540967	277445	277483	SPBC354.03	SPBC36B7.08c	swd3	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.297112404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771554	2540929	2540599	277445	277125	SPBC354.03	SPBC29A3.10c	swd3	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.70130168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771555	2540929	2540229	277445	276761	SPBC354.03	SPBC31F10.15c	swd3	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.132720617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771556	2540929	2540357	277445	276886	SPBC354.03	SPBC2F12.05c	swd3	SPBC2F12.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.69168272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771557	2540929	2538884	277445	275462	SPBC354.03	SPCC1393.08	swd3	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.288471487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771558	2540929	2540515	277445	277043	SPBC354.03	SPBC29A10.09c	swd3	tri1	-	SPBC29A10.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.098039502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771559	2540929	3361526	277445	280602	SPBC354.03	SPAC664.15	swd3	caf4	-	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.320329319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771560	2540929	2543193	277445	279622	SPBC354.03	SPAC3F10.11c	swd3	abc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.284102784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771561	2540929	3361520	277445	280596	SPBC354.03	SPAC1610.02c	swd3	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.198976182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771562	2540929	2542869	277445	279314	SPBC354.03	SPAC140.02	swd3	gar2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.319910174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771563	2540929	2540001	277445	276545	SPBC354.03	SPBC1289.13c	swd3	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.984696756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771564	2540929	2542170	277445	278645	SPBC354.03	SPAC17G8.13c	swd3	mst2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.007610734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771565	2540929	2541670	277445	278166	SPBC354.03	SPAC24H6.13	swd3	SPAC24H6.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.568444965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771566	2540929	2540701	277445	277225	SPBC354.03	SPBC19C7.08c	swd3	SPBC19C7.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983584968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771567	2540929	2539160	277445	275732	SPBC354.03	SPCC18.17c	swd3	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643999382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771568	2540929	2538762	277445	275345	SPBC354.03	SPCC306.04c	swd3	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.923297081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771569	2540929	2542327	277445	278793	SPBC354.03	SPAC16C9.06c	swd3	upf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643155172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771570	2540929	2540619	277445	277145	SPBC354.03	SPBC25H2.15	swd3	SPBC25H2.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852441955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771571	2540929	2543567	277445	279983	SPBC354.03	SPAC890.03	swd3	ppk16	-	mug92	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512113847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771572	2540929	2541121	277445	277636	SPBC354.03	SPBC609.03	swd3	iqw1	-	iqwd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.41134457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771573	2540929	2539925	277445	276469	SPBC354.03	SPBC16H5.13	swd3	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.264629937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771574	2540929	2539707	277445	276260	SPBC354.03	SPBC17F3.01c	swd3	rga5	-	SPBC557.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.771337206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771575	2540929	2538756	277445	275339	SPBC354.03	SPCC1795.10c	swd3	SPCC1795.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.040613932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771576	2540929	2542418	277445	278881	SPBC354.03	SPAC1805.07c	swd3	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.830838586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771577	2540929	2543091	277445	279524	SPBC354.03	SPAC12G12.15	swd3	sif3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09106345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771578	2540929	2543437	277445	279857	SPBC354.03	SPAPB1A10.14	swd3	pof15	-	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770772831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771579	2540929	2542826	277445	279273	SPBC354.03	SPAC13G6.09	swd3	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.703094219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771580	2540929	2539668	277445	276223	SPBC354.03	SPBC11B10.10c	swd3	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.979545932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771581	2540929	2540516	277445	277044	SPBC354.03	SPBC21C3.01c	swd3	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385509766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771582	2540929	2540267	277445	276798	SPBC354.03	SPBC32C12.03c	swd3	ppk25	-	kin2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.82623983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771583	2540929	2539207	277445	275777	SPBC354.03	SPCC285.09c	swd3	cgs2	-	pde1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979317529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771584	2540929	2543044	277445	279479	SPBC354.03	SPAC3C7.12	swd3	tip1	-	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.58296294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771585	2540929	2539702	277445	276255	SPBC354.03	SPBC1604.12	swd3	SPBC1604.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642684919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771586	2540929	2542353	277445	278818	SPBC354.03	SPAC57A10.07	swd3	SPAC57A10.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818140347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771587	2540929	2539205	277445	275775	SPBC354.03	SPCC4B3.15	swd3	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.18177431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771588	2540929	2539726	277445	276278	SPBC354.03	SPBC13E7.08c	swd3	leo1	-	SPBC13E7.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.204552483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771589	2540929	2543056	277445	279490	SPBC354.03	SPAC3A11.04	swd3	SPAC3A11.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577472555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771590	2540929	2539375	277445	275941	SPBC354.03	SPCC4G3.11	swd3	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634721639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771591	2540929	2540551	277445	277078	SPBC354.03	SPBC23E6.01c	swd3	cxr1	-	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.188610381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771592	2540929	2543380	277445	279802	SPBC354.03	SPAC4G9.16c	swd3	rpl901	-	rpl9-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.192891422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771593	2540929	3361360	277445	280436	SPBC354.03	SPBC1652.01	swd3	SPBC1652.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.923770618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771594	2540929	2543400	277445	279822	SPBC354.03	SPAC3G9.11c	swd3	SPAC3G9.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709289858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771595	2540929	2539573	277445	276133	SPBC354.03	SPCC965.06	swd3	osr2	-	SPCC965.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811423884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771596	2540929	2543387	277445	279809	SPBC354.03	SPAPB1E7.02c	swd3	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.427376257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771597	2540929	2541502	277445	278004	SPBC354.03	SPAC23D3.04c	swd3	gpd2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819642279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771598	2540929	2541478	277445	277980	SPBC354.03	SPAC2F7.17	swd3	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.92113895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771599	2540929	2540859	277445	277376	SPBC354.03	SPBC4C3.09	swd3	SPBC4C3.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816622099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771600	2540929	2540309	277445	276839	SPBC354.03	SPBC21B10.13c	swd3	yox1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.848912953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771601	2540929	2539211	277445	275781	SPBC354.03	SPCC1739.08c	swd3	SPCC1739.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.865296371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771602	2540929	2542073	277445	278550	SPBC354.03	SPAC26F1.01	swd3	sec74	-	SPAPJ691.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.117382549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771603	2540929	2542594	277445	279048	SPBC354.03	SPACUNK4.10	swd3	SPACUNK4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.846658657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771604	2540929	2542617	277445	279071	SPBC354.03	SPAC13A11.01c	swd3	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380295907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771605	2540929	2543660	277445	280074	SPBC354.03	SPAPB1E7.08c	swd3	SPAPB1E7.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.619884599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771606	2540929	2538730	277445	275314	SPBC354.03	SPCC31H12.02c	swd3	mug73	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.226565143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771607	2539079	2542518	275651	278976	SPCC1223.01	SPAC1B3.16c	SPCC1223.01	vht1	SPCC285.18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038746531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771608	2539079	2542443	275651	278905	SPCC1223.01	SPAC17G6.13	SPCC1223.01	slt1	SPCC285.18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507036297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771609	2539079	2543434	275651	279854	SPCC1223.01	SPAC8F11.02c	SPCC1223.01	dph3	SPCC285.18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92458412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771610	2539079	2538922	275651	275499	SPCC1223.01	SPCC16C4.10	SPCC1223.01	SPCC16C4.10	SPCC285.18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.338576341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771611	2539079	2542613	275651	279067	SPCC1223.01	SPAC18B11.03c	SPCC1223.01	SPAC18B11.03c	SPCC285.18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.619291082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771612	2539079	2541286	275651	277799	SPCC1223.01	SPBC9B6.11c	SPCC1223.01	SPBC9B6.11c	SPCC285.18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.960754109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771613	2539079	2543043	275651	279478	SPCC1223.01	SPAC3F10.13	SPCC1223.01	ucp6	SPCC285.18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811454542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771614	2539079	2540463	275651	276991	SPCC1223.01	SPBC2F12.15c	SPCC1223.01	pfa3	SPCC285.18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811825273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771615	2539079	2540993	275651	277509	SPCC1223.01	SPBC342.01c	SPCC1223.01	alg6	SPCC285.18	SPBC3F6.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324324222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771616	2539079	2541560	275651	278059	SPCC1223.01	SPAC24B11.12c	SPCC1223.01	SPAC24B11.12c	SPCC285.18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98182806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771617	2539079	2542023	275651	278506	SPCC1223.01	SPAC20H4.10	SPCC1223.01	ufd2	SPCC285.18	SPAC145.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779533213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771618	2539079	2543584	275651	279999	SPCC1223.01	SPAPB1E7.11c	SPCC1223.01	SPAPB1E7.11c	SPCC285.18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.261121934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771619	2539079	2541828	275651	278319	SPCC1223.01	SPAC22H12.05c	SPCC1223.01	fsc1	SPCC285.18	SPAC22H12.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576048969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771620	2539079	2542419	275651	278882	SPCC1223.01	SPAC17G6.05c	SPCC1223.01	bro1	SPCC285.18	SPAC17G6.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.646930877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771621	2539079	2539850	275651	276398	SPCC1223.01	SPBC15D4.07c	SPCC1223.01	atg9	SPCC285.18	apg9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.98538568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771622	2539079	2541053	275651	277568	SPCC1223.01	SPBC56F2.10c	SPCC1223.01	alg5	SPCC285.18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380781879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771623	2539079	2541963	275651	278449	SPCC1223.01	SPAC21E11.04	SPCC1223.01	aca1	SPCC285.18	ppr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813643566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771624	2539079	3361520	275651	280596	SPCC1223.01	SPAC1610.02c	SPCC1223.01	SPAC1610.02c	SPCC285.18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.568868372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771625	2539079	2542283	275651	278751	SPCC1223.01	SPAC27F1.08	SPCC1223.01	pdt1	SPCC285.18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989701017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771626	2539079	2541156	275651	277671	SPCC1223.01	SPBC685.07c	SPCC1223.01	rpl2701	SPCC285.18	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.130052525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771627	2539079	2543628	275651	280042	SPCC1223.01	SPAC3H8.10	SPCC1223.01	spo20	SPCC285.18	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.37959049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771628	2539079	2539555	275651	276116	SPCC1223.01	SPCC4B3.08	SPCC1223.01	lsg1	SPCC285.18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.185483053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771629	2539079	2538714	275651	275298	SPCC1223.01	SPCC330.11	SPCC1223.01	btb1	SPCC285.18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645633313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771630	2539079	2543602	275651	280017	SPCC1223.01	SPAPB1A11.04c	SPCC1223.01	mca1	SPCC285.18	SPAPB1A11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.743631118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771631	2539079	2543582	275651	279997	SPCC1223.01	SPAC4H3.06	SPCC1223.01	SPAC4H3.06	SPCC285.18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328828423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771632	2539079	2542250	275651	278720	SPCC1223.01	SPAC17D4.03c	SPCC1223.01	cis4	SPCC285.18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504743831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771633	2539079	2539702	275651	276255	SPCC1223.01	SPBC1604.12	SPCC1223.01	SPBC1604.12	SPCC285.18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92238421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771634	2539079	2543384	275651	279806	SPCC1223.01	SPAC637.06	SPCC1223.01	gmh5	SPCC285.18	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452423063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771635	2539079	2542879	275651	279324	SPCC1223.01	SPAC13G7.07	SPCC1223.01	arb2	SPCC285.18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.566885797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771636	2539079	2542908	275651	279352	SPCC1223.01	SPAC13G7.03	SPCC1223.01	upf3	SPCC285.18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874201003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771637	2539454	2539930	276017	276474	SPCC622.15c	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC622.15c	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.304068632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771638	2539454	2539420	276017	275985	SPCC622.15c	SPCC970.07c	SPCC622.15c	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.70884464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771639	2539454	2539510	276017	276072	SPCC622.15c	SPCC4G3.04c	SPCC622.15c	coq5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.838912688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771640	2539454	2542555	276017	279012	SPCC622.15c	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC622.15c	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.811654979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771641	2539454	2540929	276017	277445	SPCC622.15c	SPBC354.03	SPCC622.15c	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.210395427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771642	2539454	2542022	276017	278505	SPCC622.15c	SPAC23A1.03	SPCC622.15c	apt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319206343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771643	2539454	2540825	276017	277343	SPCC622.15c	SPBC428.08c	SPCC622.15c	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.861957503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771644	2539454	2542568	276017	279024	SPCC622.15c	SPAC1952.02	SPCC622.15c	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.30248526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771645	2539454	2539952	276017	276496	SPCC622.15c	SPBC1709.14	SPCC622.15c	SPBC1709.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807395101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771646	2539454	2542357	276017	278822	SPCC622.15c	SPAC1782.07	SPCC622.15c	qcr8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935344603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771647	2539454	2542710	276017	279163	SPCC622.15c	SPAC750.08c	SPCC622.15c	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990157254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771648	2539454	2541720	276017	278214	SPCC622.15c	SPAC23H3.13c	SPCC622.15c	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324397958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771649	2539454	2541900	276017	278390	SPCC622.15c	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC622.15c	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039500593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771650	2539454	2541009	276017	277524	SPCC622.15c	SPBC428.04	SPCC622.15c	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321499345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771651	2539454	2541614	276017	278111	SPCC622.15c	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC622.15c	elp3	-	kat9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.447800015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771652	2539454	2538848	276017	275429	SPCC622.15c	SPCC613.12c	SPCC622.15c	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.667283112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771653	2539454	2541713	276017	278208	SPCC622.15c	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC622.15c	atp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640748609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771654	2539454	2541156	276017	277671	SPCC622.15c	SPBC685.07c	SPCC622.15c	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778293166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771655	2539454	2543096	276017	279528	SPCC622.15c	SPAC977.05c	SPCC622.15c	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988840872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771656	2539454	2541789	276017	278281	SPCC622.15c	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC622.15c	iwr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.030309017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771657	2539454	2543372	276017	279794	SPCC622.15c	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC622.15c	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.820190786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771658	2539454	2543472	276017	279892	SPCC622.15c	SPAC959.04c	SPCC622.15c	omh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.479203641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771659	2540498	2538939	277026	275514	SPBC27.02c	SPCC1672.04c	ask1	SPCC1672.04c	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.469599941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771660	2540498	2542207	277026	278682	SPBC27.02c	SPAC17H9.10c	ask1	ddb1	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.76560156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771661	2540498	2539050	277026	275623	SPBC27.02c	SPCC11E10.08	ask1	rik1	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.736891612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771662	2540498	2540060	277026	276598	SPBC27.02c	SPBC106.01	ask1	mph1	mug181	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.81245106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771663	2540498	2542585	277026	279040	SPBC27.02c	SPAC31A2.13c	ask1	sft1	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445247005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771664	2540498	2542291	277026	278759	SPBC27.02c	SPAC17C9.08	ask1	pnu1	mug181	end1|nuc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317023354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771665	2540498	2542518	277026	278976	SPBC27.02c	SPAC1B3.16c	ask1	vht1	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.982419091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771666	2540498	2541426	277026	277931	SPBC27.02c	SPAC227.06	ask1	SPAC227.06	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.850203292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771667	2540498	2543291	277026	279716	SPBC27.02c	SPAC9E9.04	ask1	SPAC9E9.04	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.763620618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771668	2540498	2542127	277026	278603	SPBC27.02c	SPAC1952.12c	ask1	csn71	mug181	csn7|csn7a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.74818747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771669	2540498	2541818	277026	278309	SPBC27.02c	SPAC11G7.02	ask1	pub1	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.745020655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771670	2540498	2540901	277026	277417	SPBC27.02c	SPBC4F6.16c	ask1	ero11	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040381187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771671	2540498	2542358	277026	278823	SPBC27.02c	SPAC1782.09c	ask1	clp1	mug181	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.681660914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771672	2540498	2541650	277026	278146	SPBC27.02c	SPAC14C4.12c	ask1	laf1	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.045048542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771673	2540498	2539301	277026	275869	SPBC27.02c	SPCC622.03c	ask1	SPCC622.03c	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45412406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771674	2540498	2542293	277026	278761	SPBC27.02c	SPAC17G8.14c	ask1	pck1	mug181	SPAC22H10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.164126489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771675	2540498	2542378	277026	278842	SPBC27.02c	SPAC1805.04	ask1	nup132	mug181	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.801444205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771676	2540498	2543524	277026	279942	SPBC27.02c	SPAC4D7.07c	ask1	csi2	mug181	SPAC4D7.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.351535816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771677	2540498	2542237	277026	278709	SPBC27.02c	SPAC19E9.02	ask1	fin1	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.863317576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771678	2540498	2539930	277026	276474	SPBC27.02c	SPBC1198.11c	ask1	reb1	mug181	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.744921909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771679	2540498	3361561	277026	280637	SPBC27.02c	SPAC11E3.01c	ask1	swr1	mug181	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.011537414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771680	2540498	2541853	277026	278344	SPBC27.02c	SPAC2F3.11	ask1	SPAC2F3.11	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.439111479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771681	2540498	2540296	277026	276827	SPBC27.02c	SPBC2D10.05	ask1	exg3	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.62078144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771682	2540498	2541856	277026	278347	SPBC27.02c	SPAC23H3.08c	ask1	bub3	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.613879967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771683	2540498	2540161	277026	276696	SPBC27.02c	SPBC13E7.03c	ask1	SPBC13E7.03c	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.686510658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771684	2540498	2539734	277026	276286	SPBC27.02c	SPBC1604.16c	ask1	SPBC1604.16c	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.665971452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771685	2540498	2543164	277026	279595	SPBC27.02c	SPAC3G6.06c	ask1	rad2	mug181	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.213183445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771686	2540498	2539309	277026	275876	SPBC27.02c	SPCC4G3.19	ask1	alp16	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.951577254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771687	2540498	2540664	277026	277189	SPBC27.02c	SPBC215.02	ask1	bob1	mug181	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.622851553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771688	2540498	3361436	277026	280512	SPBC27.02c	SPAC1296.01c	ask1	SPAC1296.01c	mug181	SPAC22F3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.146002913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771689	2540498	2540999	277026	277515	SPBC27.02c	SPBC4B4.04	ask1	SPBC4B4.04	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.738100654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771690	2540498	2539332	277026	275898	SPBC27.02c	SPCPB1C11.01	ask1	amt1	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.869553927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771691	2540498	2539420	277026	275985	SPBC27.02c	SPCC970.07c	ask1	raf2	mug181	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.858622702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771692	2540498	2542468	277026	278929	SPBC27.02c	SPAC1D4.09c	ask1	rtf2	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.286271689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771693	2540498	2541208	277026	277722	SPBC27.02c	SPBC887.04c	ask1	lub1	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.214412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771694	2540498	2541214	277026	277728	SPBC27.02c	SPBC839.07	ask1	ibp1	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.158031268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771695	2540498	2538847	277026	275428	SPBC27.02c	SPCC594.06c	ask1	SPCC594.06c	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.740913257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771696	2540498	2539443	277026	276006	SPBC27.02c	SPCC736.02	ask1	SPCC736.02	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388714113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771697	2540498	2542816	277026	279263	SPBC27.02c	SPAC4G8.11c	ask1	atp10	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327128729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771698	2540498	2541498	277026	278000	SPBC27.02c	SPAC227.10	ask1	SPAC227.10	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.010216195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771699	2540498	2543579	277026	279994	SPBC27.02c	SPAC9.11	ask1	SPAC9.11	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.604358573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771700	2540498	2539564	277026	276125	SPBC27.02c	SPCC550.12	ask1	arp6	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.029522623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771701	2540498	2539463	277026	276026	SPBC27.02c	SPCC550.11	ask1	SPCC550.11	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.138991239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771702	2540498	2542689	277026	279142	SPBC27.02c	SPAC29B12.04	ask1	snz1	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632427006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771703	2540498	2539256	277026	275826	SPBC27.02c	SPCC285.04	ask1	SPCC285.04	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815383767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771704	2540498	2541419	277026	277925	SPBC27.02c	SPAC1F3.07c	ask1	rsc58	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.460162549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771705	2540498	2542848	277026	279294	SPBC27.02c	SPAC9G1.03c	ask1	rpl3001	mug181	rpl30|rpl30-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.56135718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771706	2540498	2539434	277026	275997	SPBC27.02c	SPCC757.09c	ask1	rnc1	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.538475997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771707	2540498	2540692	277026	277217	SPBC27.02c	SPBC800.07c	ask1	tsf1	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.991284884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771708	2540498	2539117	277026	275689	SPBC27.02c	SPCC74.06	ask1	mak3	mug181	phk2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.293058674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771709	2540498	2539575	277026	276135	SPBC27.02c	SPCP20C8.02c	ask1	SPCP20C8.02c	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.144944805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771710	2540498	2539937	277026	276481	SPBC27.02c	SPBC1539.08	ask1	arf6	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.412273007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771711	2540498	2539314	277026	275880	SPBC27.02c	SPCC548.05c	ask1	dbl5	mug181	SPCC548.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.207667116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771712	2540498	2542012	277026	278495	SPBC27.02c	SPAC23C11.02c	ask1	rps23	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.111889625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771713	2540498	2542182	277026	278657	SPBC27.02c	SPAC19B12.08	ask1	atg4	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983210247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771714	2540498	2541669	277026	278165	SPBC27.02c	SPAC22G7.07c	ask1	ime4	mug181	SPAC22G7.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.193165736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771715	2540498	2541424	277026	277929	SPBC27.02c	SPAC23G3.04	ask1	ies4	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.631313893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771716	2540498	2542318	277026	278784	SPBC27.02c	SPAC16C9.05	ask1	cph1	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.00738495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771717	2540498	2541560	277026	278059	SPBC27.02c	SPAC24B11.12c	ask1	SPAC24B11.12c	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.845795835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771718	2540498	2542023	277026	278506	SPBC27.02c	SPAC20H4.10	ask1	ufd2	mug181	SPAC145.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.731665321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771719	2540498	2540295	277026	276826	SPBC27.02c	SPBC3B8.05	ask1	SPBC3B8.05	mug181	dph1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981360879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771720	2540498	2542277	277026	278746	SPBC27.02c	SPAC17A5.02c	ask1	dbr1	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.323115167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771721	2540498	2539057	277026	275630	SPBC27.02c	SPCC70.04c	ask1	SPCC70.04c	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567433651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771722	2540498	2541580	277026	278077	SPBC27.02c	SPAC1687.05	ask1	pli1	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.965823116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771723	2540498	2539129	277026	275701	SPBC27.02c	SPCC338.14	ask1	ado1	mug181	SPCC338.14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.617171975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771724	2540498	2539244	277026	275814	SPBC27.02c	SPCC1672.06c	ask1	asp1	mug181	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.723337341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771725	2540498	2543563	277026	279979	SPBC27.02c	SPAC664.02c	ask1	arp8	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.553860353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771726	2540498	2542082	277026	278559	SPBC27.02c	SPAC29B12.10c	ask1	pgt1	mug181	opt1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.40273941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771727	2540498	2538866	277026	275446	SPBC27.02c	SPCC1620.12c	ask1	SPCC1620.12c	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511101124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771728	2540498	2543584	277026	279999	SPBC27.02c	SPAPB1E7.11c	ask1	SPAPB1E7.11c	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.385031671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771729	2540498	2543426	277026	279846	SPBC27.02c	SPAC631.02	ask1	bdf2	mug181	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.676074592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771730	2540498	2541905	277026	278395	SPBC27.02c	SPAC6G9.01c	ask1	SPAC6G9.01c	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.405875517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771731	2540498	2543078	277026	279511	SPBC27.02c	SPAC31A2.15c	ask1	dcc1	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.81675429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771732	2540498	2543319	277026	279743	SPBC27.02c	SPAC6B12.09	ask1	trm10	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.414997959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771733	2540498	2538906	277026	275483	SPBC27.02c	SPCC1259.03	ask1	rpa12	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.528103962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771734	2540498	2542253	277026	278723	SPBC27.02c	SPAC17H9.04c	ask1	SPAC17H9.04c	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045250766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771735	2540498	2542981	277026	279419	SPBC27.02c	SPAC824.02	ask1	bst1	mug181	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.980101342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771736	2540498	2543615	277026	280029	SPBC27.02c	SPAC4F8.08	ask1	mug114	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873766418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771737	2540498	2540825	277026	277343	SPBC27.02c	SPBC428.08c	ask1	clr4	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.200952866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771738	2540498	2539448	277026	276011	SPBC27.02c	SPCC825.04c	ask1	naa40	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514624346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771739	2540498	2539023	277026	275596	SPBC27.02c	SPCC594.05c	ask1	spf1	mug181	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.023499031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771740	2540498	2541544	277026	278044	SPBC27.02c	SPAC22G7.06c	ask1	ura1	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807265047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771741	2540498	2542268	277026	278737	SPBC27.02c	SPAC17A5.07c	ask1	ulp2	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.023160604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771742	2540498	2542036	277026	278518	SPBC27.02c	SPAC23A1.19c	ask1	hrq1	mug181	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.345323729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771743	2540498	2539467	277026	276030	SPBC27.02c	SPCC417.07c	ask1	mto1	mug181	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.984919028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771744	2540498	3361461	277026	280537	SPBC27.02c	SPAC11H11.01	ask1	sst6	mug181	cps23	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.751110798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771745	2540498	2543514	277026	279932	SPBC27.02c	SPAC4D7.03	ask1	pop2	mug181	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.620508209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771746	2540498	2541664	277026	278160	SPBC27.02c	SPAC2H10.01	ask1	SPAC2H10.01	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516011317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771747	2540498	2538821	277026	275402	SPBC27.02c	SPCC584.01c	ask1	SPCC584.01c	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319467139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771748	2540498	2541800	277026	278291	SPBC27.02c	SPAC732.02c	ask1	SPAC732.02c	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.257095566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771749	2540498	2542646	277026	279100	SPBC27.02c	SPAC11H11.05c	ask1	fta6	mug181	sma6	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.109353858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771750	2540498	2541776	277026	278270	SPBC27.02c	SPAC23H3.05c	ask1	swd1	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.051966098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771751	2540498	2541264	277026	277778	SPBC27.02c	SPBC902.06	ask1	mto2	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647820688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771752	2540498	2543445	277026	279865	SPBC27.02c	SPAC4F10.13c	ask1	mpd2	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.819131543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771753	2540498	2542249	277026	278719	SPBC27.02c	SPAC30D11.14c	ask1	SPAC30D11.14c	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041917076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771754	2540498	2538770	277026	275353	SPBC27.02c	SPCC1753.02c	ask1	git3	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.866618763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771755	2540498	2539628	277026	276185	SPBC27.02c	SPBC1604.03c	ask1	SPBC1604.03c	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817798185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771756	2540498	2542463	277026	278924	SPBC27.02c	SPAC1834.03c	ask1	hhf1	mug181	h4.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.112926977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771757	2540498	3361491	277026	280567	SPBC27.02c	SPAC1805.08	ask1	dlc1	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386171861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771758	2540498	2540338	277026	276867	SPBC27.02c	SPBC2G2.13c	ask1	dcd1	mug181	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.806483743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771759	2540498	2542123	277026	278599	SPBC27.02c	SPAC18G6.15	ask1	mal3	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.431694934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771760	2540498	2538706	277026	275290	SPBC27.02c	SPCC338.08	ask1	ctp1	mug181	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.803288916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771761	2540498	2540352	277026	276881	SPBC27.02c	SPBC215.03c	ask1	csn1	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511361491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771762	2540498	2540396	277026	276924	SPBC27.02c	SPBC31F10.12	ask1	tma20	mug181	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.006702129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771763	2540498	2538800	277026	275381	SPBC27.02c	SPCC1322.06	ask1	kap113	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.818668799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771764	2540498	2541578	277026	278075	SPBC27.02c	SPAC25B8.05	ask1	deg1	mug181	SPAC25B8.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.71275779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771765	2540498	2539219	277026	275789	SPBC27.02c	SPCC1795.01c	ask1	mad3	mug181	SPCC895.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.520231382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771766	2540498	2542817	277026	279264	SPBC27.02c	SPAC13G6.02c	ask1	rps101	mug181	rps1-1|rps3a-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384629472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771767	2540498	2542921	277026	279362	SPBC27.02c	SPAC1093.01	ask1	ppr5	mug181	SPAC12B10.18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932980271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771768	2540498	2541496	277026	277998	SPBC27.02c	SPAC23D3.09	ask1	arp42	mug181	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.847876792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771769	2540498	2539168	277026	275739	SPBC27.02c	SPCC1620.08	ask1	SPCC1620.08	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816451858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771770	2540498	2539857	277026	276404	SPBC27.02c	SPBC1604.20c	ask1	tea2	mug181	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.578597804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771771	2540498	2543643	277026	280057	SPBC27.02c	SPAC3G9.07c	ask1	hos2	mug181	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.728537663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771772	2540498	2541899	277026	278389	SPBC27.02c	SPAC22E12.11c	ask1	set3	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.065548791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771773	2540498	2539586	277026	276145	SPBC27.02c	SPCC70.08c	ask1	SPCC70.08c	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325882375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771774	2540498	2542902	277026	279346	SPBC27.02c	SPAC144.05	ask1	SPAC144.05	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.362385769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771775	2540498	2540231	277026	276763	SPBC27.02c	SPBC336.14c	ask1	ppk26	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.631293286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771776	2540498	2541710	277026	278205	SPBC27.02c	SPAC343.11c	ask1	msc1	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.022376721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771777	2540498	2539667	277026	276222	SPBC27.02c	SPBC13G1.08c	ask1	ash2	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.9215642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771778	2540498	2542861	277026	279307	SPBC27.02c	SPAC13G7.13c	ask1	msa1	mug181	SPAC6C3.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.554392052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771779	2540498	2542126	277026	278602	SPBC27.02c	SPAC1B3.05	ask1	not3	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.271270547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771780	2540498	2542032	277026	278514	SPBC27.02c	SPAC23C11.04c	ask1	pnk1	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980509207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771781	2540498	2540628	277026	277154	SPBC27.02c	SPBC25B2.08	ask1	SPBC25B2.08	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.459290378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771782	2540498	2542007	277026	278490	SPBC27.02c	SPAC20H4.07	ask1	rad57	mug181	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.86009749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771783	2540498	2543244	277026	279672	SPBC27.02c	SPAC6B12.06c	ask1	rrg9	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.615918385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771784	2540498	2540751	277026	277273	SPBC27.02c	SPBC20F10.10	ask1	psl1	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.922837851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771785	2540498	2542976	277026	279414	SPBC27.02c	SPAC9E9.09c	ask1	atd1	mug181	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.111577044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771786	2540498	2541542	277026	278042	SPBC27.02c	SPAC4G9.02	ask1	rnh201	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.800998562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771787	2540498	2540232	277026	276764	SPBC27.02c	SPBC336.10c	ask1	tif512	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.775004747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771788	2540498	2543378	277026	279800	SPBC27.02c	SPAC3H8.07c	ask1	pac10	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.802435948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771789	2540498	2542867	277026	279312	SPBC27.02c	SPAC343.16	ask1	lys2	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572861445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771790	2540498	2539408	277026	275973	SPBC27.02c	SPCC576.12c	ask1	mhf2	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.187158208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771791	2540498	2542519	277026	278977	SPBC27.02c	SPAC19G12.08	ask1	scs7	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.980156876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771792	2540498	2541009	277026	277524	SPBC27.02c	SPBC428.04	ask1	apq12	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.973890954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771793	2540498	5802861	277026	857999	SPBC27.02c	SPAC1D4.01	ask1	tls1	mug181	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.868952443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771794	2540498	2539715	277026	276268	SPBC27.02c	SPBC1778.09	ask1	SPBC1778.09	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193735773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771795	2540498	2543443	277026	279863	SPBC27.02c	SPAC3H1.12c	ask1	snt2	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.622862174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771796	2540498	2541389	277026	277900	SPBC27.02c	SPBPB2B2.09c	ask1	SPBPB2B2.09c	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781231271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771797	2540498	2542618	277026	279072	SPBC27.02c	SPAC1952.15c	ask1	rec24	mug181	mug6	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.102622125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771798	2540498	2538708	277026	275292	SPBC27.02c	SPCC594.01	ask1	SPCC594.01	mug181	SPCC736.16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57528421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771799	2540498	2541708	277026	278203	SPBC27.02c	SPAC31A2.02	ask1	trm112	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.982740808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771800	2540498	2541464	277026	277966	SPBC27.02c	SPAC222.08c	ask1	SPAC222.08c	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.123110463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771801	2540498	2540342	277026	276871	SPBC27.02c	SPBC2G2.01c	ask1	liz1	mug181	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.204165133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771802	2540498	2539402	277026	275967	SPBC27.02c	SPCC613.03	ask1	SPCC613.03	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382729818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771803	2540498	2543307	277026	279731	SPBC27.02c	SPAC694.05c	ask1	rps2502	mug181	rps25|rps25-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.625583236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771804	2540498	2540967	277026	277483	SPBC27.02c	SPBC36B7.08c	ask1	SPBC36B7.08c	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.637643073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771805	2540498	2540850	277026	277367	SPBC27.02c	SPBC18A7.02c	ask1	SPBC18A7.02c	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148587853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771806	2540498	2540882	277026	277399	SPBC27.02c	SPBC4F6.08c	ask1	mrpl39	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.191386441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771807	2540498	2543331	277026	279754	SPBC27.02c	SPAC56E4.07	ask1	SPAC56E4.07	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872713637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771808	2540498	2540533	277026	277061	SPBC27.02c	SPBC29A10.16c	ask1	SPBC29A10.16c	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.83633474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771809	2540498	2538690	277026	275275	SPBC27.02c	SPCC1393.05	ask1	ers1	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.351913088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771810	2540498	2540229	277026	276761	SPBC27.02c	SPBC31F10.15c	ask1	atp15	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.638079722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771811	2540498	2541927	277026	278415	SPBC27.02c	SPAC222.12c	ask1	atp2	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.633175749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771812	2540498	2538884	277026	275462	SPBC27.02c	SPCC1393.08	ask1	SPCC1393.08	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.190369539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771813	2540498	3361105	277026	280181	SPBC27.02c	SPCC188.10c	ask1	SPCC188.10c	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.510230967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771814	2540498	2542255	277026	278725	SPBC27.02c	SPAC57A7.08	ask1	pzh1	mug181	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.251777144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771815	2540498	2541488	277026	277990	SPBC27.02c	SPAC227.17c	ask1	SPAC227.17c	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.906415585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771816	2540498	2543477	277026	279897	SPBC27.02c	SPAPB2B4.04c	ask1	SPAPB2B4.04c	mug181	pmc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.393586157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771817	2540498	2543049	277026	279484	SPBC27.02c	SPAC1296.04	ask1	mug65	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.563672551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771818	2540498	2539812	277026	276362	SPBC27.02c	SPBC1347.02	ask1	fkbp39	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.610389388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771819	2540498	2540005	277026	276549	SPBC27.02c	SPBC1347.09	ask1	SPBC1347.09	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818219704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771820	2540498	2541337	277026	277848	SPBC27.02c	SPBP35G2.13c	ask1	swc2	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387394187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771821	2540498	2541378	277026	277889	SPBC27.02c	SPBP8B7.21	ask1	ubp3	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98494848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771822	2540498	2539527	277026	276089	SPBC27.02c	SPCC338.16	ask1	pof3	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510292165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771823	2540498	2543139	277026	279571	SPBC27.02c	SPAC12G12.03	ask1	cip2	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.01903354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771824	2540498	2540589	277026	277115	SPBC27.02c	SPBC20F10.06	ask1	mad2	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.9943299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771825	2540498	2542973	277026	279412	SPBC27.02c	SPAC10F6.04	ask1	SPAC10F6.04	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262145509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771826	2540498	2541963	277026	278449	SPBC27.02c	SPAC21E11.04	ask1	aca1	mug181	ppr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981356359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771827	2540498	2538848	277026	275429	SPBC27.02c	SPCC613.12c	ask1	raf1	mug181	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.617340857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771828	2540498	3361520	277026	280596	SPBC27.02c	SPAC1610.02c	ask1	SPAC1610.02c	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.46793159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771829	2540498	2541144	277026	277659	SPBC27.02c	SPBC685.06	ask1	rps001	mug181	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.273633091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771830	2540498	2540743	277026	277266	SPBC27.02c	SPBC215.06c	ask1	SPBC215.06c	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043958978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771831	2540498	2539908	277026	276454	SPBC27.02c	SPBC13E7.06	ask1	msd1	mug181	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.90254602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771832	2540498	2539763	277026	276314	SPBC27.02c	SPBC1861.05	ask1	SPBC1861.05	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.057461749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771833	2540498	2542198	277026	278673	SPBC27.02c	SPAC6F12.09	ask1	rdp1	mug181	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.448880854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771834	2540498	2539160	277026	275732	SPBC27.02c	SPCC18.17c	ask1	SPCC18.17c	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.850802819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771835	2540498	2539499	277026	276062	SPBC27.02c	SPCC622.08c	ask1	hta1	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771200172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771836	2540498	2538762	277026	275345	SPBC27.02c	SPCC306.04c	ask1	set1	mug181	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.369030163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771837	2540498	2542619	277026	279073	SPBC27.02c	SPAC6G10.02c	ask1	tea3	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.70624379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771838	2540498	2543628	277026	280042	SPBC27.02c	SPAC3H8.10	ask1	spo20	mug181	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.748157483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771839	2540498	2539101	277026	275673	SPBC27.02c	SPCC736.04c	ask1	gma12	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38332087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771840	2540498	2543051	277026	279486	SPBC27.02c	SPAC1071.08	ask1	rpp203	mug181	rla6|rpp2-3|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.570788569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771841	2540498	2542516	277026	278974	SPBC27.02c	SPAC2F7.04	ask1	pmc2	mug181	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.82328842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771842	2540498	2541909	277026	278399	SPBC27.02c	SPAC227.01c	ask1	erd1	mug181	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.688304909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771843	2540498	2542915	277026	279357	SPBC27.02c	SPAC6C3.06c	ask1	SPAC6C3.06c	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090725949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771844	2540498	2539770	277026	276321	SPBC27.02c	SPBC1685.11	ask1	rlp1	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193928604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771845	2540498	2543304	277026	279728	SPBC27.02c	SPAC6B12.12	ask1	tom70	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.403095987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771846	2540498	2542541	277026	278998	SPBC27.02c	SPAC1B3.03c	ask1	wis2	mug181	cyp5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.27655801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771847	2540498	2540384	277026	276913	SPBC27.02c	SPBC29A10.11c	ask1	vps902	mug181	vps9b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.620178064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771848	2540498	2538717	277026	275301	SPBC27.02c	SPCC1235.02	ask1	bio2	mug181	SPCC320.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097113853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771849	2540498	2538966	277026	275540	SPBC27.02c	SPCC18.10	ask1	SPCC18.10	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.620012708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771850	2540498	2541358	277026	277869	SPBC27.02c	SPBP4H10.16c	ask1	SPBP4H10.16c	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.082565297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771851	2540498	2541459	277026	277961	SPBC27.02c	SPAC227.11c	ask1	SPAC227.11c	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924240784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771852	2540498	2541531	277026	278031	SPBC27.02c	SPAC25A8.01c	ask1	fft3	mug181	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.04279849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771853	2540498	2542418	277026	278881	SPBC27.02c	SPAC1805.07c	ask1	dad2	mug181	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.607525065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771854	2540498	2542826	277026	279273	SPBC27.02c	SPAC13G6.09	ask1	SPAC13G6.09	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.811550891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771855	2540498	2543602	277026	280017	SPBC27.02c	SPAPB1A11.04c	ask1	mca1	mug181	SPAPB1A11.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.457407268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771856	2540498	2543420	277026	279842	SPBC27.02c	SPAC3H1.04c	ask1	mdm31	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.323418057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771857	2540498	2542628	277026	279082	SPBC27.02c	SPAC24H6.06	ask1	sld3	mug181	mug175	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.278236054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771858	2540498	2540992	277026	277508	SPBC27.02c	SPBC342.05	ask1	crb2	mug181	rhp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.898104527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771859	2540498	2543109	277026	279541	SPBC27.02c	SPAC3G6.09c	ask1	tps2	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989871249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771860	2540498	2539207	277026	275777	SPBC27.02c	SPCC285.09c	ask1	cgs2	mug181	pde1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813405155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771861	2540498	2543633	277026	280047	SPBC27.02c	SPAC3H8.05c	ask1	mms1	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.985563088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771862	2540498	2540936	277026	277452	SPBC27.02c	SPBC800.05c	ask1	atb2	mug181	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.502935243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771863	2540498	2543046	277026	279481	SPBC27.02c	SPAC3C7.10	ask1	pex13	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.408104694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771864	2540498	2543044	277026	279479	SPBC27.02c	SPAC3C7.12	ask1	tip1	mug181	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.451240641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771865	2540498	2539205	277026	275775	SPBC27.02c	SPCC4B3.15	ask1	mid1	mug181	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.631731548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771866	2540498	3361117	277026	280193	SPBC27.02c	SPCC663.17	ask1	wtf15	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503306354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771867	2540498	2539726	277026	276278	SPBC27.02c	SPBC13E7.08c	ask1	leo1	mug181	SPBC13E7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.09615525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771868	2540498	2540667	277026	277192	SPBC27.02c	SPBC211.06	ask1	gfh1	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330742132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771869	2540498	2542904	277026	279348	SPBC27.02c	SPAC144.11	ask1	rps1102	mug181	rps11|rps11-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.685861801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771870	2540498	2539375	277026	275941	SPBC27.02c	SPCC4G3.11	ask1	mug154	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.365117322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771871	2540498	2538840	277026	275421	SPBC27.02c	SPCC736.07c	ask1	SPCC736.07c	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.548729832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771872	2540498	2539189	277026	275760	SPBC27.02c	SPCC1682.16	ask1	rpt4	mug181	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.092496782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771873	2540498	2541941	277026	278428	SPBC27.02c	SPAC20H4.03c	ask1	tfs1	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199854987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771874	2540498	2542244	277026	278714	SPBC27.02c	SPAC19G12.13c	ask1	poz1	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577939937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771875	2540498	2542021	277026	278504	SPBC27.02c	SPAP14E8.02	ask1	tos4	mug181	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.680471447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771876	2540498	2543486	277026	279906	SPBC27.02c	SPAC959.07	ask1	rps403	mug181	rps4|rps4-3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.12327064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771877	2540498	2539169	277026	275740	SPBC27.02c	SPCC1235.11	ask1	mpc1	mug181	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.558658841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771878	2540498	2543384	277026	279806	SPBC27.02c	SPAC637.06	ask1	gmh5	mug181	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383344101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771879	2540498	2541806	277026	278297	SPBC27.02c	SPAC4G8.13c	ask1	prz1	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991385213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771880	2540498	2543387	277026	279809	SPBC27.02c	SPAPB1E7.02c	ask1	mcl1	mug181	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.141210367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771881	2540498	2539259	277026	275829	SPBC27.02c	SPCC553.05c	ask1	wtf6	mug181	SPCC553.05c|SPCC553.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924980445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771882	2540498	2539768	277026	276319	SPBC27.02c	SPBC1703.09	ask1	SPBC1703.09	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093776269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771883	2540498	2538920	277026	275497	SPBC27.02c	SPCC1840.05c	ask1	SPCC1840.05c	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.447428687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771884	2540498	2539440	277026	276003	SPBC27.02c	SPCC550.08	ask1	SPCC550.08	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439858857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771885	2540498	2539588	277026	276146	SPBC27.02c	SPCC962.04	ask1	rps1201	mug181	rps12|rps12-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.421365265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771886	2540498	2541478	277026	277980	SPBC27.02c	SPAC2F7.17	ask1	mrf1	mug181	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.023951406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771887	2540498	2539085	277026	275657	SPBC27.02c	SPCC285.15c	ask1	rps2802	mug181	rps28|rps28-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5765106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771888	2540498	2541808	277026	278299	SPBC27.02c	SPAC22A12.14c	ask1	SPAC22A12.14c	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574668749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771889	2540498	2543333	277026	279756	SPBC27.02c	SPAC694.02	ask1	SPAC694.02	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636542594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771890	2540498	2543448	277026	279868	SPBC27.02c	SPAC3H5.07	ask1	rpl702	mug181	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.694317318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771891	2540498	2542890	277026	279334	SPBC27.02c	SPAC13G6.14	ask1	aps1	mug181	SPAC24B11.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.873365888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771892	2540498	2542440	277026	278902	SPBC27.02c	SPAC17A2.12	ask1	rrp1	mug181	SPAC17A2.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851111511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771893	2540498	2542656	277026	279110	SPBC27.02c	SPAC2E1P3.05c	ask1	SPAC2E1P3.05c	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.338133364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771894	2540498	2542087	277026	278564	SPBC27.02c	SPAC26F1.02	ask1	pnn1	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931462794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771895	2540498	2542073	277026	278550	SPBC27.02c	SPAC26F1.01	ask1	sec74	mug181	SPAPJ691.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.568023013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771896	2540498	2543472	277026	279892	SPBC27.02c	SPAC959.04c	ask1	omh6	mug181	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.045742497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771897	2540498	2542680	277026	279133	SPBC27.02c	SPAC26F1.09	ask1	gyp51	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.410378346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771898	2540498	2541576	277026	278073	SPBC27.02c	SPBC1348.02	ask1	SPBC1348.02	mug181	SPAC1348.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149513417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771899	2540498	2542617	277026	279071	SPBC27.02c	SPAC13A11.01c	ask1	rga8	mug181	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.674870195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771900	2540498	2542836	277026	279282	SPBC27.02c	SPAC13G7.06	ask1	met16	mug181	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094353749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771901	2540498	2541260	277026	277774	SPBC27.02c	SPBC902.05c	ask1	idh2	mug181	glu2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.611870589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771902	2540498	2540649	277026	277174	SPBC27.02c	SPBC19F8.08	ask1	rps401	mug181	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.278533083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771903	2539047	2542066	275620	278543	SPCC1223.06	SPAC227.05	tea1	SPAC227.05	alp8	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989428475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771904	2539047	2543434	275620	279854	SPCC1223.06	SPAC8F11.02c	tea1	dph3	alp8	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514364108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771905	2539047	2541058	275620	277573	SPCC1223.06	SPBC3H7.09	tea1	erf2	alp8	mug142	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980640917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771906	2539047	2542022	275620	278505	SPCC1223.06	SPAC23A1.03	tea1	apt1	alp8	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704236828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771907	2539047	2542981	275620	279419	SPCC1223.06	SPAC824.02	tea1	bst1	alp8	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.395132212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771908	2539047	2541735	275620	278229	SPCC1223.06	SPAC7D4.04	tea1	atg11	alp8	taf1|cvt9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930864232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771909	2539047	2540990	275620	277506	SPCC1223.06	SPBC36B7.06c	tea1	mug20	alp8	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507026977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771910	2539047	2540533	275620	277061	SPCC1223.06	SPBC29A10.16c	tea1	SPBC29A10.16c	alp8	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.407218638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771911	2539047	2541156	275620	277671	SPCC1223.06	SPBC685.07c	tea1	rpl2701	alp8	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.751939797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771912	2539047	2541909	275620	278399	SPCC1223.06	SPAC227.01c	tea1	erd1	alp8	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.627898559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771913	2539047	2543582	275620	279997	SPCC1223.06	SPAC4H3.06	tea1	SPAC4H3.06	alp8	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930005189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771914	2539047	2538920	275620	275497	SPCC1223.06	SPCC1840.05c	tea1	SPCC1840.05c	alp8	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568081091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771915	2543668	2541912	280082	278402	SPAC9.05	SPAC222.16c	fml1	csn3	-	SPAC821.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77140018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771916	2543668	2539210	280082	275780	SPAC9.05	SPCC2H8.05c	fml1	dbl1	-	SPCC2H8.05c|SPCC63.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.749778321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771917	2543668	3361570	280082	280646	SPAC9.05	SPAC750.01	fml1	SPAC750.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.710934309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771918	2543668	3361342	280082	280418	SPAC9.05	SPBC16D10.07c	fml1	sir2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.052025933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771919	2543668	2540425	280082	276953	SPAC9.05	SPBC27.06c	fml1	mgr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.454113881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771920	2543668	2542558	280082	279014	SPAC9.05	SPAC1952.07	fml1	rad1	-	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.139940229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771921	2543668	2539990	280082	276534	SPAC9.05	SPBC1289.14	fml1	SPBC1289.14	-	SPBC8E4.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567412045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771922	2543668	2542699	280082	279152	SPAC9.05	SPAC5H10.07	fml1	SPAC5H10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440015148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771923	2543668	2541543	280082	278043	SPAC9.05	SPAC5H10.04	fml1	SPAC5H10.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711411034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771924	2543668	2540150	280082	276687	SPAC9.05	SPBC16E9.14c	fml1	zrg17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.392627244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771925	2543668	2539603	280082	276161	SPAC9.05	SPBC1289.06c	fml1	ppr8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.401191151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771926	2543668	2538994	280082	275568	SPAC9.05	SPCC553.01c	fml1	dbl2	-	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.569409893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771927	2543668	2540374	280082	276903	SPAC9.05	SPBC31F10.02	fml1	SPBC31F10.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.055241118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771928	2543668	2540229	280082	276761	SPAC9.05	SPBC31F10.15c	fml1	atp15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809040833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771929	2543668	2541746	280082	278240	SPAC9.05	SPAC20G4.04c	fml1	hus1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.199180765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771930	2543668	2542327	280082	278793	SPAC9.05	SPAC16C9.06c	fml1	upf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.848939686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771931	2543668	2540992	280082	277508	SPAC9.05	SPBC342.05	fml1	crb2	-	rhp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643847781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771932	2543668	2542607	280082	279061	SPAC9.05	SPAC18B11.02c	fml1	SPAC18B11.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992996253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771933	2543668	2540558	280082	277085	SPAC9.05	SPBC2D10.17	fml1	clr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510521556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771934	2541695	2542816	278191	279263	SPAC1F7.05	SPAC4G8.11c	cdc22	atp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513864483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771935	2541695	2540533	278191	277061	SPAC1F7.05	SPBC29A10.16c	cdc22	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.945323367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771936	3361561	2542207	280637	278682	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC17H9.10c	swr1	ddb1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.841434492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771937	3361561	2543529	280637	279947	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC4C5.02c	swr1	ryh1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.226331361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771938	3361561	2543634	280637	280048	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC3H8.04	swr1	SPAC3H8.04	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.201336783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771939	3361561	2540296	280637	276827	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC2D10.05	swr1	exg3	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643702188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771940	3361561	2540347	280637	276876	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC30B4.08	swr1	eri1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.30630129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771941	3361561	2542701	280637	279154	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC26H5.05	swr1	mga2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.39380953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771942	3361561	2541771	280637	278265	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC23H3.06	swr1	apl6	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.614489546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771943	3361561	2539309	280637	275876	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC4G3.19	swr1	alp16	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.928326348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771944	3361561	2538806	280637	275387	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC1840.09	swr1	SPCC1840.09	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325269341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771945	3361561	2540043	280637	276581	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC1198.12	swr1	mfr1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPBC660.02|fzr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.804035874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771946	3361561	2539226	280637	275796	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC16C4.20c	swr1	SPCC16C4.20c	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.495326349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771947	3361561	2538847	280637	275428	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC594.06c	swr1	SPCC594.06c	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706773201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771948	3361561	2539564	280637	276125	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC550.12	swr1	arp6	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924129561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771949	3361561	2542724	280637	279175	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC767.01c	swr1	vps1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.212387565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771950	3361561	2542848	280637	279294	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC9G1.03c	swr1	rpl3001	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	rpl30|rpl30-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.004728006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771951	3361561	2540929	280637	277445	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC354.03	swr1	swd3	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.059509531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771952	3361561	2540425	280637	276953	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC27.06c	swr1	mgr2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.930899217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771953	3361561	2542135	280637	278611	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC13A11.04c	swr1	ubp8	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.359825274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771954	3361561	2542318	280637	278784	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC16C9.05	swr1	cph1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.765703022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771955	3361561	2542023	280637	278506	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC20H4.10	swr1	ufd2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPAC145.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1662248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771956	3361561	2542277	280637	278746	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC17A5.02c	swr1	dbr1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.022009287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771957	3361561	2540595	280637	277121	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC21C3.02c	swr1	dep1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.163228525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771958	3361561	2543563	280637	279979	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC664.02c	swr1	arp8	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.181044926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771959	3361561	2543426	280637	279846	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC631.02	swr1	bdf2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.41214522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771960	3361561	2542665	280637	279118	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC10F6.08c	swr1	nht10	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	nht1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.261029951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771961	3361561	2539051	280637	275624	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC1183.11	swr1	msy1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.315425443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771962	3361561	2541776	280637	278270	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC23H3.05c	swr1	swd1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.326481885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771963	3361561	2542707	280637	279160	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC25G10.03	swr1	zip1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.235042295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771964	3361561	2542652	280637	279106	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC1687.15	swr1	gsk3	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	skp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.889279304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771965	3361561	2540150	280637	276687	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC16E9.14c	swr1	zrg17	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.903688838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771966	3361561	2541889	280637	278379	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC2F7.03c	swr1	pom1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.368929834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771967	3361561	2539219	280637	275789	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC1795.01c	swr1	mad3	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPCC895.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57887999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771968	3361561	2542921	280637	279362	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC1093.01	swr1	ppr5	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPAC12B10.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508474512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771969	3361561	2539999	280637	276543	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC1734.15	swr1	rsc4	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.432381291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771970	3361561	2541496	280637	277998	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC23D3.09	swr1	arp42	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.529818611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771971	3361561	2543667	280637	280081	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC4H3.02c	swr1	swc3	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.500724962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771972	3361561	2542357	280637	278822	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC1782.07	swr1	qcr8	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.264948222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771973	3361561	2543643	280637	280057	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC3G9.07c	swr1	hos2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.662404328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771974	3361561	2541710	280637	278205	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC343.11c	swr1	msc1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.322175412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771975	3361561	2539995	280637	276539	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC1105.09	swr1	ubc15	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193510221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771976	3361561	2539667	280637	276222	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC13G1.08c	swr1	ash2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.891276436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771977	3361561	2541900	280637	278390	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC23H4.17c	swr1	srb10	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.156293897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771978	3361561	2542549	280637	279006	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC19A8.11c	swr1	SPAC19A8.11c	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.772346118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771979	3361561	2539408	280637	275973	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC576.12c	swr1	mhf2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7132003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771980	3361561	2543683	280637	280097	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAPB1E7.04c	swr1	SPAPB1E7.04c	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.786348992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771981	3361561	2543443	280637	279863	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC3H1.12c	swr1	snt2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.6677576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771982	3361561	2541536	280637	278036	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC1071.02	swr1	mms19	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.570024243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771983	3361561	2540342	280637	276871	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC2G2.01c	swr1	liz1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.905764768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771984	3361561	2540967	280637	277483	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC36B7.08c	swr1	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.461615185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771985	3361561	3361470	280637	280546	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC3G9.01	swr1	nsk1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.521407861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771986	3361561	2539059	280637	275632	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC737.06c	swr1	SPCC737.06c	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152519496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771987	3361561	2541488	280637	277990	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC227.17c	swr1	SPAC227.17c	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.336961929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771988	3361561	2541337	280637	277848	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBP35G2.13c	swr1	swc2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.557874489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771989	3361561	2539519	280637	276081	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC364.05	swr1	vps3	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.916437115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771990	3361561	2542806	280637	279254	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC1610.01	swr1	saf5	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.510432048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771991	3361561	2539842	280637	276390	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC14C8.15	swr1	SPBC14C8.15	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.386907211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771992	3361561	2542516	280637	278974	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC2F7.04	swr1	pmc2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.014488369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771993	3361561	2540498	280637	277026	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC27.02c	swr1	ask1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.011537414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771994	3361561	2538966	280637	275540	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC18.10	swr1	SPCC18.10	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.177146247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771995	3361561	2542472	280637	278933	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC9E9.13	swr1	wos2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.448487436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771996	3361561	2541531	280637	278031	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC25A8.01c	swr1	fft3	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.87013309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771997	3361561	2542418	280637	278881	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC1805.07c	swr1	dad2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.359802372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771998	3361561	2543427	280637	279847	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAPB1A10.15	swr1	arv1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.430954927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
771999	3361561	2539668	280637	276223	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC11B10.10c	swr1	pht1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	pi001	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.288417304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772000	3361561	2543672	280637	280086	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC4H3.01	swr1	SPAC4H3.01	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.655495257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772001	3361561	2542250	280637	278720	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC17D4.03c	swr1	cis4	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454941488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772002	3361561	2539928	280637	276472	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC1604.08c	swr1	imp1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5132781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772003	3361561	2542786	280637	279235	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC15A10.07	swr1	SPAC15A10.07	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582247476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772004	3361561	2539205	280637	275775	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC4B3.15	swr1	mid1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.494484561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772005	3361561	2539169	280637	275740	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC1235.11	swr1	mpc1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505199249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772006	3361561	2542716	280637	279169	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC25H1.07	swr1	emc1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.328955445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772007	3361561	2539700	280637	276253	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC1685.15c	swr1	klp6	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.423775426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772008	3361561	2541806	280637	278297	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC4G8.13c	swr1	prz1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.418379821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772009	3361561	2543387	280637	279809	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAPB1E7.02c	swr1	mcl1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.740861209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772010	3361561	2542700	280637	279153	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC26H5.08c	swr1	bgl2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.999942038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772011	3361561	2543333	280637	279756	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC694.02	swr1	SPAC694.02	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.624987878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772012	3361561	2542943	280637	279384	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC1348.03	swr1	SPBC1348.03	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.128748409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772013	2543674	2541345	280088	277856	SPAC637.13c	SPBP35G2.07	slm1	ilv1	SPAC637.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701407774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772014	2543674	2539564	280088	276125	SPAC637.13c	SPCC550.12	slm1	arp6	SPAC637.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.050265032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772015	2543674	2542530	280088	278988	SPAC637.13c	SPAC1399.02	slm1	SPAC1399.02	SPAC637.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.207565483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772016	2543674	2539381	280088	275947	SPAC637.13c	SPCC1739.10	slm1	mug33	SPAC637.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.119086608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772017	2543674	2541249	280088	277763	SPAC637.13c	SPBC947.01	slm1	alf1	SPAC637.13c	SPBC947.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.988541617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772018	2543674	2541776	280088	278270	SPAC637.13c	SPAC23H3.05c	slm1	swd1	SPAC637.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.31209584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772019	2543674	2542297	280088	278764	SPAC637.13c	SPAC17H9.06c	slm1	SPAC17H9.06c	SPAC637.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.500165663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772020	2543674	2542453	280088	278914	SPAC637.13c	SPAC186.01	slm1	pfl9	SPAC637.13c	SPAC186.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.25387331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772021	2543674	3361389	280088	280465	SPAC637.13c	SPAC977.13c	slm1	SPAC977.13c	SPAC637.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.199265047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772022	2543674	2538714	280088	275298	SPAC637.13c	SPCC330.11	slm1	btb1	SPAC637.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.108630593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772023	2543674	2541432	280088	277937	SPAC637.13c	SPAC1F5.05c	slm1	mso1	SPAC637.13c	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.336708633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772024	2543674	2540380	280088	276909	SPAC637.13c	SPBC1A4.05	slm1	blt1	SPAC637.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.720768997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772025	2538963	2541311	275537	277823	SPCC777.08c	SPBP8B7.09c	bit61	los1	SPCC777.08	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.258262121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772026	2538963	2542857	275537	279303	SPCC777.08c	SPAC144.06	bit61	apl5	SPCC777.08	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.271420333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772027	2538963	2542976	275537	279414	SPCC777.08c	SPAC9E9.09c	bit61	atd1	SPCC777.08	SPAC9E9.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808115205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772028	2538963	2539160	275537	275732	SPCC777.08c	SPCC18.17c	bit61	SPCC18.17c	SPCC777.08	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.848137751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772029	2538963	2538962	275537	275536	SPCC777.08c	SPCC965.13	bit61	SPCC965.13	SPCC777.08	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.772096313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772030	2542374	2539050	278838	275623	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC11E10.08	cdt2	rik1	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.309657478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772031	2542374	2540279	278838	276810	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC3B8.04c	cdt2	SPBC3B8.04c	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.610584146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772032	2542374	2539147	278838	275719	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC622.12c	cdt2	gdh1	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.942157107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772033	2542374	2538721	278838	275305	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC1494.10	cdt2	adn3	sev1	SPCC70.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.218241133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772034	2542374	2539841	278838	276389	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC17D1.05	cdt2	SPBC17D1.05	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.551091031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772035	2542374	2540060	278838	276598	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC106.01	cdt2	mph1	sev1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.072196484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772036	2542374	2538961	278838	275535	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC285.14	cdt2	trs130	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.779473543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772037	2542374	2541826	278838	278317	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC2G11.13	cdt2	atg22	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.337190702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772038	2542374	2540105	278838	276642	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC106.04	cdt2	ada1	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452533559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772039	2542374	2540885	278838	277402	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC660.14	cdt2	mik1	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.980993712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772040	2542374	2542291	278838	278759	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC17C9.08	cdt2	pnu1	sev1	end1|nuc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.110073005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772041	2542374	2539949	278838	276493	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC1703.04	cdt2	mlh1	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.319519893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772042	2542374	2542518	278838	278976	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC1B3.16c	cdt2	vht1	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.878778968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772043	2542374	2541512	278838	278013	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC11E3.08c	cdt2	nse6	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.548749388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772044	2542374	2540913	278838	277429	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC56F2.08c	cdt2	SPBC56F2.08c	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.133147159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772045	2542374	2539452	278838	276015	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC70.03c	cdt2	SPCC70.03c	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.257285829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772046	2542374	2542066	278838	278543	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC227.05	cdt2	SPAC227.05	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462801679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772047	2542374	2539749	278838	276301	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC16A3.13	cdt2	meu7	sev1	aah4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193232936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772048	2542374	2540956	278838	277472	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC409.06	cdt2	uch2	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039763406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772049	2542374	2538977	278838	275551	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC1020.06c	cdt2	tal1	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.918294796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772050	2542374	2542127	278838	278603	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC1952.12c	cdt2	csn71	sev1	csn7|csn7a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323460121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772051	2542374	2540131	278838	276668	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC1778.05c	cdt2	SPBC1778.05c	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.587454885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772052	2542374	2543211	278838	279640	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC12B10.15c	cdt2	SPAC12B10.15c	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.12822348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772053	2542374	2541650	278838	278146	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC14C4.12c	cdt2	laf1	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773385006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772054	2542374	2542378	278838	278842	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC1805.04	cdt2	nup132	sev1	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.324883319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772055	2542374	2540528	278838	277056	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC18H10.04c	cdt2	sce3	sev1	tif48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.28345443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772056	2542374	2543339	278838	279762	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC630.13c	cdt2	tsc2	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.721149555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772057	2542374	2541135	278838	277650	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC839.03c	cdt2	SPBC839.03c	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.072528326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772058	2542374	2539930	278838	276474	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC1198.11c	cdt2	reb1	sev1	SPBC660.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.250949149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772059	2542374	3361561	278838	280637	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC11E3.01c	cdt2	swr1	sev1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986824539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772060	2542374	2541853	278838	278344	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC2F3.11	cdt2	SPAC2F3.11	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317304843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772061	2542374	2541002	278838	277517	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC3E7.07c	cdt2	SPBC3E7.07c	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.995161966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772062	2542374	2541117	278838	277632	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC646.13	cdt2	sds23	sev1	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.059124547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772063	2542374	2540161	278838	276696	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC13E7.03c	cdt2	SPBC13E7.03c	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.892080023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772064	2542374	2541345	278838	277856	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBP35G2.07	cdt2	ilv1	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505050569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772065	2542374	2539944	278838	276488	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC1198.06c	cdt2	SPBC1198.06c	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.08196812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772066	2542374	2542758	278838	279208	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC15E1.02c	cdt2	SPAC15E1.02c	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.843437097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772067	2542374	2540139	278838	276676	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC1773.06c	cdt2	adh8	sev1	SPBC1773.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.860772821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772068	2542374	2543434	278838	279854	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC8F11.02c	cdt2	dph3	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.506420583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772069	2542374	2540686	278838	277211	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC21D10.10	cdt2	bdc1	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.133383631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772070	2542374	2542103	278838	278579	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC31G5.11	cdt2	pac2	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980640205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772071	2542374	2542040	278838	278521	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC212.01c	cdt2	SPAC212.01c	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986634132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772072	2542374	2543320	278838	279744	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAPJ695.01c	cdt2	SPAPJ695.01c	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.029163935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772073	2542374	2541891	278838	278381	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC1F8.03c	cdt2	str3	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.659940772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772074	2542374	2539210	278838	275780	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC2H8.05c	cdt2	dbl1	sev1	SPCC2H8.05c|SPCC63.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.69930536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772075	2542374	2540975	278838	277491	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC354.12	cdt2	gpd3	sev1	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.990030118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772076	2542374	2539420	278838	275985	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC970.07c	cdt2	raf2	sev1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.184817638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772077	2542374	2540564	278838	277091	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC530.03c	cdt2	bag102	sev1	bag1-b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929828718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772078	2542374	2542677	278838	279130	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC26F1.10c	cdt2	pyp1	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.499398056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772079	2542374	2538775	278838	275357	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC23B6.05c	cdt2	ssb3	sev1	rpa3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.743958212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772080	2542374	2539564	278838	276125	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC550.12	cdt2	arp6	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19289189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772081	2542374	2542669	278838	279122	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC29B12.08	cdt2	clr5	sev1	SPAC29B12.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.682918596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772082	2542374	2542696	278838	279149	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC29B12.03	cdt2	spd1	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.572585257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772083	2542374	2538801	278838	275382	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC285.13c	cdt2	nup60	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.816780803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772084	2542374	2540945	278838	277461	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC342.06c	cdt2	rtt109	sev1	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.871263166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772085	2542374	2543453	278838	279873	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC3G9.03	cdt2	rpl2301	sev1	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.812072108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772086	2542374	2539331	278838	275897	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC24B10.09	cdt2	rps1702	sev1	rps17|rps17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77834115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772087	2542374	2539575	278838	276135	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCP20C8.02c	cdt2	SPCP20C8.02c	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.373838963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772088	2542374	2539937	278838	276481	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC1539.08	cdt2	arf6	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.733255351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772089	2542374	2543636	278838	280050	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC3H8.08c	cdt2	SPAC3H8.08c	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.94258467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772090	2542374	2541045	278838	277560	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC543.03c	cdt2	pku80	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.165449805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772091	2542374	2541669	278838	278165	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC22G7.07c	cdt2	ime4	sev1	SPAC22G7.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579467138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772092	2542374	2540727	278838	277250	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC1921.03c	cdt2	mex67	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.555607609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772093	2542374	2542022	278838	278505	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC23A1.03	cdt2	apt1	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.263589102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772094	2542374	2542135	278838	278611	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC13A11.04c	cdt2	ubp8	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.080008664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772095	2542374	2542318	278838	278784	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC16C9.05	cdt2	cph1	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.897924994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772096	2542374	2541560	278838	278059	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC24B11.12c	cdt2	SPAC24B11.12c	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812269228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772097	2542374	2540364	278838	276893	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC29B5.02c	cdt2	isp4	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.625691711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772098	2542374	2540595	278838	277121	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC21C3.02c	cdt2	dep1	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.205775195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772099	2542374	2541643	278838	278139	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC14C4.13	cdt2	rad17	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.641817671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772100	2542374	2541580	278838	278077	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC1687.05	cdt2	pli1	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.056077922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772101	2542374	2539244	278838	275814	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC1672.06c	cdt2	asp1	sev1	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.129160131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772102	2542374	2538698	278838	275283	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC1442.02	cdt2	SPCC1442.02	sev1	SPCC1450.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.949040037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772103	2542374	2540714	278838	277237	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC19C2.04c	cdt2	ubp11	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.014789913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772104	2542374	2543584	278838	279999	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAPB1E7.11c	cdt2	SPAPB1E7.11c	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.931003777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772105	2542374	2541905	278838	278395	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC6G9.01c	cdt2	SPAC6G9.01c	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.977839269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772106	2542374	2539352	278838	275918	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC188.07	cdt2	ccq1	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.773817889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772107	2542374	2543078	278838	279511	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC31A2.15c	cdt2	dcc1	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.695801752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772108	2542374	2538906	278838	275483	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC1259.03	cdt2	rpa12	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.320392418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772109	2542374	2541301	278838	277813	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBP23A10.05	cdt2	ssr4	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87810862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772110	2542374	2539092	278838	275664	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC1259.08	cdt2	SPCC1259.08	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.626666739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772111	2542374	2539478	278838	276041	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC550.07	cdt2	SPCC550.07	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.564457377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772112	2542374	2541020	278838	277535	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC354.04	cdt2	SPBC354.04	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.920151744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772113	2542374	2542558	278838	279014	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC1952.07	cdt2	rad1	sev1	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.616700645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772114	2542374	3361391	278838	280467	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC13G6.01c	cdt2	rad8	sev1	SPAC5H10.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.499887246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772115	2542374	2542554	278838	279011	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC1952.03	cdt2	otu2	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380476826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772116	2542374	2539237	278838	275807	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC24B10.13	cdt2	skb5	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.994079665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772117	2542374	2539388	278838	275953	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC24B10.12	cdt2	cgi121	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.265583319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772118	2542374	2543514	278838	279932	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC4D7.03	cdt2	pop2	sev1	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.183050137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772119	2542374	2539051	278838	275624	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC1183.11	cdt2	msy1	sev1	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81510019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772120	2542374	2539870	278838	276416	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC1709.18	cdt2	tif452	sev1	SPBC409.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.198397227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772121	2542374	2540192	278838	276725	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC1215.01	cdt2	shy1	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.915110116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772122	2542374	2543445	278838	279865	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC4F10.13c	cdt2	mpd2	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.322765346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772123	2542374	2539628	278838	276185	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC1604.03c	cdt2	SPBC1604.03c	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.841481147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772124	2542374	2542652	278838	279106	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC1687.15	cdt2	gsk3	sev1	skp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.41924397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772125	2542374	2541160	278838	277675	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC725.09c	cdt2	hob3	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.710947248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772126	2542374	2540348	278838	276877	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC29A10.05	cdt2	exo1	sev1	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381230666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772127	2542374	2541038	278838	277553	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC29A10.01	cdt2	ccr1	sev1	SPBC365.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.82107443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772128	2542374	2540338	278838	276867	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC2G2.13c	cdt2	dcd1	sev1	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.360632662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772129	2542374	2538706	278838	275290	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC338.08	cdt2	ctp1	sev1	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.577076116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772130	2542374	2543412	278838	279834	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC637.07	cdt2	moe1	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.042432711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772131	2542374	2539831	278838	276380	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC15C4.05	cdt2	dhx29	sev1	SPBC15C4.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.998992161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772132	2542374	2538843	278838	275424	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC162.08c	cdt2	nup211	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869033475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772133	2542374	2542160	278838	278636	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC8C9.11	cdt2	fra2	sev1	SPAC8C9.11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928149552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772134	2542374	2540363	278838	276892	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC2F12.09c	cdt2	atf21	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864376207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772135	2542374	2541496	278838	277998	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC23D3.09	cdt2	arp42	sev1	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.677384381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772136	2542374	2541166	278838	277681	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC725.15	cdt2	ura5	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.15992178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772137	2542374	2542925	278838	279366	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC11E3.04c	cdt2	ubc13	sev1	spu13|sst5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.198453824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772138	2542374	2538994	278838	275568	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC553.01c	cdt2	dbl2	sev1	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.294876193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772139	2542374	2541310	278838	277822	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBP18G5.03	cdt2	toc1	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.110215111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772140	2542374	2541532	278838	278032	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC2C4.15c	cdt2	ubx2	sev1	ucp13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.001000307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772141	2542374	2543250	278838	279678	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC3G9.15c	cdt2	fcf2	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205866197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772142	2542374	2539995	278838	276539	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC1105.09	cdt2	ubc15	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637690576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772143	2542374	2538769	278838	275352	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC126.04c	cdt2	sgf73	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.309309915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772144	2542374	2541830	278838	278321	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC5H10.01	cdt2	SPAC5H10.01	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.995737644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772145	2542374	3361269	278838	280345	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC31A8.01c	cdt2	rtn1	sev1	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991023595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772146	2542374	2540194	278838	276727	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC1709.09	cdt2	rrf1	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.259287637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772147	2542374	2540665	278838	277190	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC83.02c	cdt2	rpl4302	sev1	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842175048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772148	2542374	2538873	278838	275452	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC306.11	cdt2	SPCC306.11	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445425055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772149	2542374	2538841	278838	275422	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC550.03c	cdt2	SPCC550.03c	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.438394071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772150	2542374	2543234	278838	279662	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC977.11	cdt2	SPAC977.11	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.073861583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772151	2542374	2543311	278838	279735	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC977.15	cdt2	SPAC977.15	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.028817176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772152	2542374	2539408	278838	275973	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC576.12c	cdt2	mhf2	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.033523766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772153	2542374	2542519	278838	278977	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC19G12.08	cdt2	scs7	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.118283111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772154	2542374	2539481	278838	276044	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC622.16c	cdt2	epe1	sev1	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.870759067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772155	2542374	2541009	278838	277524	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC428.04	cdt2	apq12	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.267433089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772156	2542374	2539215	278838	275785	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC285.16c	cdt2	msh6	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.152189519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772157	2542374	2540335	278838	276865	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC30B4.03c	cdt2	adn1	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780276103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772158	2542374	2542056	278838	278535	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC6G9.14	cdt2	SPAC6G9.14	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.621682159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772159	2542374	2539715	278838	276268	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC1778.09	cdt2	SPBC1778.09	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6313105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772160	2542374	2541389	278838	277900	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBPB2B2.09c	cdt2	SPBPB2B2.09c	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.687278889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772161	2542374	2543561	278838	279977	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC922.04	cdt2	SPAC922.04	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.976544232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772162	2542374	2540019	278838	276563	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC1685.01	cdt2	pmp1	sev1	dsp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982763751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772163	2542374	2542125	278838	278601	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAP8A3.03	cdt2	SPAP8A3.03	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.936288453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772164	2542374	2542008	278838	278491	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC2G11.07c	cdt2	ptc3	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325226879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772165	2542374	2541536	278838	278036	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC1071.02	cdt2	mms19	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.505426766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772166	2542374	2540201	278838	276734	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC13A2.04c	cdt2	ptr2	sev1	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.257758802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772167	2542374	2541708	278838	278203	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC31A2.02	cdt2	trm112	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.008785768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772168	2542374	2543517	278838	279935	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC3G9.05	cdt2	spa2	sev1	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.135675286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772169	2542374	2540850	278838	277367	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC18A7.02c	cdt2	SPBC18A7.02c	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153967508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772170	2542374	2539059	278838	275632	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC737.06c	cdt2	SPCC737.06c	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.309181388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772171	2542374	2541565	278838	278063	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC1250.03	cdt2	ubc14	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321768856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772172	2542374	2539711	278838	276264	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC1683.09c	cdt2	frp1	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.802847053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772173	2542374	2540687	278838	277212	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC21D10.08c	cdt2	SPBC21D10.08c	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.919285125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772174	2542374	2538690	278838	275275	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC1393.05	cdt2	ers1	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.920513296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772175	2542374	2541927	278838	278415	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC222.12c	cdt2	atp2	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819553158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772176	2542374	2538884	278838	275462	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC1393.08	cdt2	SPCC1393.08	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.072848318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772177	2542374	2541746	278838	278240	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC20G4.04c	cdt2	hus1	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.989088223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772178	2542374	2539853	278838	276401	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC1347.07	cdt2	rex2	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.977480943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772179	2542374	2539812	278838	276362	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC1347.02	cdt2	fkbp39	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.556818747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772180	2542374	2540193	278838	276726	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC1289.10c	cdt2	adn2	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.482311251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772181	2542374	2541337	278838	277848	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBP35G2.13c	cdt2	swc2	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.976768356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772182	2542374	3361134	278838	280210	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC737.09c	cdt2	hmt1	sev1	SPCC74.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.284072986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772183	2542374	2543515	278838	279933	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC4F10.14c	cdt2	btf3	sev1	btt1|egd1|nac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.41061159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772184	2542374	2539519	278838	276081	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC364.05	cdt2	vps3	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384622927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772185	2542374	2540691	278838	277216	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC20F10.05	cdt2	nrl1	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.823445965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772186	2542374	2542748	278838	279198	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC15A10.09c	cdt2	pun1	sev1	SPAC15A10.09c|sur7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.688209895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772187	2542374	2538848	278838	275429	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC613.12c	cdt2	raf1	sev1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.863264952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772188	2542374	2540946	278838	277462	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC36.04	cdt2	cys11	sev1	cys1a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.933253305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772189	2542374	2541144	278838	277659	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC685.06	cdt2	rps001	sev1	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.272785058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772190	2542374	2540821	278838	277339	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC800.03	cdt2	clr3	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.145409629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772191	2542374	2539763	278838	276314	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC1861.05	cdt2	SPBC1861.05	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.629617687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772192	2542374	2542198	278838	278673	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC6F12.09	cdt2	rdp1	sev1	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.630651242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772193	2542374	2539686	278838	276241	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC1734.06	cdt2	rhp18	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.259313923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772194	2542374	2539160	278838	275732	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC18.17c	cdt2	SPCC18.17c	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.892463917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772195	2542374	2541786	278838	278278	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC22F3.08c	cdt2	rok1	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.713273427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772196	2542374	2542992	278838	279430	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC1071.09c	cdt2	SPAC1071.09c	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.075112677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772197	2542374	2540226	278838	276758	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC32H8.08c	cdt2	omh5	sev1	pi016|SPACTOKYO_453.20	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.224297599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772198	2542374	2539499	278838	276062	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC622.08c	cdt2	hta1	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.064472945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772199	2542374	2541370	278838	277881	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBP8B7.07c	cdt2	set6	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.469069289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772200	2542374	2543519	278838	279937	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC4F10.08	cdt2	mug126	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462766216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772201	2542374	2539555	278838	276116	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC4B3.08	cdt2	lsg1	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.208707559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772202	2542374	2542327	278838	278793	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC16C9.06c	cdt2	upf1	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.244660771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772203	2542374	2540619	278838	277145	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC25H2.15	cdt2	SPBC25H2.15	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.184658322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772204	2542374	2542286	278838	278754	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC1786.01c	cdt2	ptl2	sev1	SPAC1786.01c|SPAC31G5.20c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992794366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772205	2542374	2541175	278838	277689	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC839.13c	cdt2	rpl1601	sev1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.422201395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772206	2542374	2541909	278838	278399	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC227.01c	cdt2	erd1	sev1	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445715091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772207	2542374	2539276	278838	275844	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC622.07	cdt2	SPCC622.07	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810330927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772208	2542374	2540498	278838	277026	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC27.02c	cdt2	ask1	sev1	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.703992753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772209	2542374	2540800	278838	277319	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC409.20c	cdt2	psh3	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323889902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772210	2542374	2539799	278838	276349	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC106.11c	cdt2	plg7	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.878971688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772211	2542374	2540960	278838	277476	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC3D6.02	cdt2	but2	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.194180151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772212	2542374	2541372	278838	277883	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBP8B7.28c	cdt2	stc1	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320989828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772213	2542374	2542075	278838	278552	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC27D7.06	cdt2	etf1	sev1	SPAC27D7.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.322792087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772214	2542374	2541358	278838	277869	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBP4H10.16c	cdt2	SPBP4H10.16c	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.140366404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772215	2542374	2540935	278838	277451	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC359.04c	cdt2	pfl7	sev1	SPBC359.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.350883878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772216	2542374	2541425	278838	277930	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC2C4.17c	cdt2	msy2	sev1	SPAC2C4.17c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807157141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772217	2542374	2540115	278838	276652	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC1778.02	cdt2	rap1	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.62526316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772218	2542374	2540346	278838	276875	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC2F12.03c	cdt2	ebs1	sev1	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.330586055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772219	2542374	2539013	278838	275586	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC364.03	cdt2	rpl1702	sev1	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.337357429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772220	2542374	2541470	278838	277972	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAPYUG7.04c	cdt2	rpb9	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.348209873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772221	2542374	2540699	278838	277223	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC800.08	cdt2	gcd10	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6937385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772222	2542374	2543329	278838	279752	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC56F8.02	cdt2	SPAC56F8.02	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.248281519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772223	2542374	2542418	278838	278881	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC1805.07c	cdt2	dad2	sev1	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.700981205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772224	2542374	2539729	278838	276281	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC11B10.07c	cdt2	ivn1	sev1	pi004|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.464194481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772225	2542374	2539514	278838	276076	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC663.14c	cdt2	trp663	sev1	SPCC663.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.773103649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772226	2542374	2540211	278838	276744	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC947.15c	cdt2	nde1	sev1	SPBC947.15c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.400500157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772227	2542374	2542727	278838	279177	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC26A3.02	cdt2	myh1	sev1	myh	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.124764302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772228	2542374	2542303	278838	278770	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC1687.21	cdt2	SPAC1687.21	sev1	SPAC222.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.936865557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772229	2542374	2540992	278838	277508	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC342.05	cdt2	crb2	sev1	rhp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.64049955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772230	2542374	2540568	278838	277095	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC28F2.08c	cdt2	SPBC28F2.08c	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633237366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772231	2542374	2539488	278838	276051	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC645.08c	cdt2	snd1	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.583864028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772232	2542374	2540927	278838	277443	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC365.06	cdt2	pmt3	sev1	smt3|ubl2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.87628176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772233	2542374	2543633	278838	280047	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC3H8.05c	cdt2	mms1	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.781665948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772234	2542374	2539702	278838	276255	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC1604.12	cdt2	SPBC1604.12	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.609754497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772235	2542374	2539205	278838	275775	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC4B3.15	cdt2	mid1	sev1	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.44190876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772236	2542374	2542904	278838	279348	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC144.11	cdt2	rps1102	sev1	rps11|rps11-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329866525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772237	2542374	2539189	278838	275760	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC1682.16	cdt2	rpt4	sev1	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.201842398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772238	2542374	2539178	278838	275749	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC1682.14	cdt2	rpl1902	sev1	rpl19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.329967755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772239	2542374	2543337	278838	279760	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC959.08	cdt2	rpl2102	sev1	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.999567311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772240	2542374	3361410	278838	280486	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC1527.01	cdt2	mok11	sev1	SPAC23D3.15	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978822129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772241	2542374	2540683	278838	277208	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC19G7.04	cdt2	SPBC19G7.04	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.824661077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772242	2542374	2539700	278838	276253	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC1685.15c	cdt2	klp6	sev1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.467050408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772243	2542374	2541806	278838	278297	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC4G8.13c	cdt2	prz1	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.623339583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772244	2542374	2543387	278838	279809	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAPB1E7.02c	cdt2	mcl1	sev1	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.96021104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772245	2542374	2543327	278838	279750	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC1D4.06c	cdt2	csk1	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.753348504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772246	2542374	2541627	278838	278123	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC1F5.08c	cdt2	yam8	sev1	ehs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.36728151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772247	2542374	2543087	278838	279520	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC30C2.04	cdt2	SPAC30C2.04	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.630213388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772248	2542374	2542566	278838	279022	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC8C9.12c	cdt2	SPAC8C9.12c	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.135367695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772249	2542374	2540481	278838	277009	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC2D10.12	cdt2	rhp23	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.744743708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772250	2542374	2542424	278838	278886	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC1805.14	cdt2	SPAC1805.14	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.120207531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772251	2542374	2541869	278838	278359	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC22F3.13	cdt2	tsc1	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.433010317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772252	2542374	2539588	278838	276146	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC962.04	cdt2	rps1201	sev1	rps12|rps12-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.224110391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772253	2542374	2541646	278838	278142	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC750.06c	cdt2	SPAC750.06c	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043582172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772254	2542374	2541478	278838	277980	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC2F7.17	cdt2	mrf1	sev1	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099681706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772255	2542374	2539085	278838	275657	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC285.15c	cdt2	rps2802	sev1	rps28|rps28-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.620613712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772256	2542374	2541491	278838	277993	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC2C4.16c	cdt2	rps801	sev1	rps8|rps8-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256542505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772257	2542374	2540167	278838	276702	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC1683.04	cdt2	SPBC1683.04	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.334519302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772258	2542374	2543333	278838	279756	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC694.02	cdt2	SPAC694.02	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.648198403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772259	2542374	2543090	278838	279523	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC1348.01	cdt2	SPBC1348.01	sev1	SPAC1348.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.931856391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772260	2542374	2542656	278838	279110	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC2E1P3.05c	cdt2	SPAC2E1P3.05c	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449777439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772261	2542374	2540067	278838	276605	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC16H5.05c	cdt2	cyp7	sev1	cwf27	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.728309893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772262	2542374	2542943	278838	279384	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC1348.03	cdt2	SPBC1348.03	sev1	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.955858876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772263	2542374	2542094	278838	278571	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC29B12.06c	cdt2	rcd1	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.839517144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772264	2542374	2540811	278838	277330	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC19C7.05	cdt2	SPBC19C7.05	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.514886833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772265	2542374	2540787	278838	277306	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC1921.07c	cdt2	sgf29	sev1	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.061177018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772266	2542374	2539494	278838	276057	SPAC17H9.19c	SPCC4G3.08	cdt2	psk1	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866822722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772267	2542374	2541260	278838	277774	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC902.05c	cdt2	idh2	sev1	glu2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.976870492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772268	2542374	2539708	278838	276261	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC1861.06c	cdt2	mug131	sev1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990004425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772269	2542374	2540649	278838	277174	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC19F8.08	cdt2	rps401	sev1	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.38252675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772270	2542374	2540736	278838	277259	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC19F8.02	cdt2	SPBC19F8.02	sev1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.493642075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772271	2541468	2538847	277970	275428	SPAC1F5.09c	SPCC594.06c	shk2	SPCC594.06c	pak2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.690415886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772272	2541468	2541021	277970	277536	SPAC1F5.09c	SPBC3B8.10c	shk2	nem1	pak2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380346663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772273	2541468	2543245	277970	279673	SPAC1F5.09c	SPAC56F8.06c	shk2	alg10	pak2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.184273431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772274	2541468	2540831	277970	277349	SPAC1F5.09c	SPBC428.02c	shk2	eca39	pak2	SPBC582.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321199829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772275	2541468	2540326	277970	276856	SPAC1F5.09c	SPBC2G5.06c	shk2	hmt2	pak2	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571697541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772276	2541468	2539667	277970	276222	SPAC1F5.09c	SPBC13G1.08c	shk2	ash2	pak2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.062479015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772277	2541468	2541053	277970	277568	SPAC1F5.09c	SPBC56F2.10c	shk2	alg5	pak2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.915071856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772278	2541468	2540533	277970	277061	SPAC1F5.09c	SPBC29A10.16c	shk2	SPBC29A10.16c	pak2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.315129516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772279	2541468	2538848	277970	275429	SPAC1F5.09c	SPCC613.12c	shk2	raf1	pak2	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.816954474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772280	2541468	2540800	277970	277319	SPAC1F5.09c	SPBC409.20c	shk2	psh3	pak2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.849722023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772281	2541468	2539205	277970	275775	SPAC1F5.09c	SPCC4B3.15	shk2	mid1	pak2	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.881917038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772282	2541468	2538730	277970	275314	SPAC1F5.09c	SPCC31H12.02c	shk2	mug73	pak2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.339786219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772283	2542497	2538939	278956	275514	SPAC1A6.04c	SPCC1672.04c	plb1	SPCC1672.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.495044517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772284	2542497	2538796	278956	275377	SPAC1A6.04c	SPCC63.06	plb1	SPCC63.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577151952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772285	2542497	2542577	278956	279033	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAC19G12.15c	plb1	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.846218903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772286	2542497	2540105	278956	276642	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC106.04	plb1	ada1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.509525733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772287	2542497	2542723	278956	279174	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAC25H1.03	plb1	atg101	-	mug66	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504800455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772288	2542497	2538977	278956	275551	SPAC1A6.04c	SPCC1020.06c	plb1	tal1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.378401695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772289	2542497	2539165	278956	275736	SPAC1A6.04c	SPCC1281.04	plb1	SPCC1281.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.882599371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772290	2542497	2539301	278956	275869	SPAC1A6.04c	SPCC622.03c	plb1	SPCC622.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101822199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772291	2542497	2540528	278956	277056	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC18H10.04c	plb1	sce3	-	tif48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783672353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772292	2542497	2541117	278956	277632	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC646.13	plb1	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387032014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772293	2542497	2540474	278956	277002	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC26H8.09c	plb1	snf59	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711556782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772294	2542497	2540168	278956	276703	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC1683.06c	plb1	SPBC1683.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871594612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772295	2542497	2539332	278956	275898	SPAC1A6.04c	SPCPB1C11.01	plb1	amt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767360221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772296	2542497	3361375	278956	280451	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAC212.06c	plb1	SPAC212.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189557045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772297	2542497	3361570	278956	280646	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAC750.01	plb1	SPAC750.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.922193603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772298	2542497	2539443	278956	276006	SPAC1A6.04c	SPCC736.02	plb1	SPCC736.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931749014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772299	2542497	2539564	278956	276125	SPAC1A6.04c	SPCC550.12	plb1	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.250879146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772300	2542497	2543316	278956	279740	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAPJ691.02	plb1	SPAPJ691.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.849107824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772301	2542497	2538801	278956	275382	SPAC1A6.04c	SPCC285.13c	plb1	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.626113154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772302	2542497	2542724	278956	279175	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAC767.01c	plb1	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.318148945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772303	2542497	2539249	278956	275819	SPAC1A6.04c	SPCC1450.05c	plb1	rox3	-	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.254895189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772304	2542497	2539434	278956	275997	SPAC1A6.04c	SPCC757.09c	plb1	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851653653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772305	2542497	2541026	278956	277541	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC337.09	plb1	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.050796285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772306	2542497	2540313	278956	276843	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC337.04	plb1	ppk27	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.26162408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772307	2542497	2540463	278956	276991	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC2F12.15c	plb1	pfa3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189155181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772308	2542497	2539302	278956	275870	SPAC1A6.04c	SPCC126.09	plb1	zip2	-	SPCC126.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868741849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772309	2542497	2542165	278956	278641	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAC1782.08c	plb1	rex3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514225121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772310	2542497	2543586	278956	280001	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAC458.04c	plb1	dli1	-	dil1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380485184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772311	2542497	2540595	278956	277121	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC21C3.02c	plb1	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331676753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772312	2542497	2539244	278956	275814	SPAC1A6.04c	SPCC1672.06c	plb1	asp1	-	vip1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86804895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772313	2542497	2540714	278956	277237	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC19C2.04c	plb1	ubp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820231032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772314	2542497	2542253	278956	278723	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAC17H9.04c	plb1	SPAC17H9.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.40714443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772315	2542497	2539467	278956	276030	SPAC1A6.04c	SPCC417.07c	plb1	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390181299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772316	2542497	2542695	278956	279148	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAC12B10.09	plb1	pet801	-	SPAC12B10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045787374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772317	2542497	2541664	278956	278160	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAC2H10.01	plb1	SPAC2H10.01	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04069272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772318	2542497	2542177	278956	278652	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAC17H9.08	plb1	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.263374901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772319	2542497	2540797	278956	277316	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC18H10.11c	plb1	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.395138415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772320	2542497	2542513	278956	278971	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAC1952.05	plb1	gcn5	-	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.027724789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772321	2542497	2538770	278956	275353	SPAC1A6.04c	SPCC1753.02c	plb1	git3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.130075611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772322	2542497	2543412	278956	279834	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAC637.07	plb1	moe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.255873797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772323	2542497	2540673	278956	277198	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC1D7.03	plb1	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.501859279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772324	2542497	2542921	278956	279362	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAC1093.01	plb1	ppr5	-	SPAC12B10.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.562179833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772325	2542497	2543363	278956	279785	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAPB24D3.09c	plb1	pdr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145526938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772326	2542497	2539857	278956	276404	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC1604.20c	plb1	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44645654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772327	2542497	2540801	278956	277320	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC18H10.10c	plb1	saf4	-	cwc16|cwf16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844738503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772328	2542497	2539233	278956	275803	SPAC1A6.04c	SPCC16A11.03c	plb1	SPCC16A11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.886722404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772329	2542497	2543250	278956	279678	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAC3G9.15c	plb1	fcf2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.273406591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772330	2542497	2543057	278956	279491	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAC694.03	plb1	SPAC694.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09851314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772331	2542497	2538808	278956	275389	SPAC1A6.04c	SPCPB16A4.05c	plb1	SPCPB16A4.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928144995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772332	2542497	2538810	278956	275391	SPAC1A6.04c	SPCC338.02	plb1	mug112	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041785206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772333	2542497	2540961	278956	277477	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC36B7.03	plb1	sec63	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864613258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772334	2542497	2539217	278956	275787	SPAC1A6.04c	SPCC1223.03c	plb1	gut2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.80876883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772335	2542497	2538849	278956	275430	SPAC1A6.04c	SPCC330.14c	plb1	rpl2402	-	rpl24-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197215741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772336	2542497	2539974	278956	276518	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC32H8.07	plb1	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.441575909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772337	2542497	2541720	278956	278214	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAC23H3.13c	plb1	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.263115167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772338	2542497	2542498	278956	278957	SPAC1A6.04c	SPACUNK4.16c	plb1	SPACUNK4.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040239755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772339	2542497	2540394	278956	276922	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC2D10.09	plb1	snr1	-	SPBC2D10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.668236426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772340	2542497	2538841	278956	275422	SPAC1A6.04c	SPCC550.03c	plb1	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868770955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772341	2542497	2543357	278956	279779	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAC688.12c	plb1	SPAC688.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.139775748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772342	2542497	2542214	278956	278688	SPAC1A6.04c	SPACUNK4.11c	plb1	mpp6	-	SPACUNK4.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.567534579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772343	2542497	2543311	278956	279735	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAC977.15	plb1	SPAC977.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318264878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772344	2542497	2539953	278956	276497	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC1709.11c	plb1	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392522166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772345	2542497	2540335	278956	276865	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC30B4.03c	plb1	adn1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.260444085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772346	2542497	2540387	278956	276915	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC24C6.04	plb1	SPBC24C6.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865075905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772347	2542497	2541389	278956	277900	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBPB2B2.09c	plb1	SPBPB2B2.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043059723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772348	2542497	2539368	278956	275934	SPAC1A6.04c	SPCC16A11.07	plb1	coq10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.402872571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772349	2542497	3361105	278956	280181	SPAC1A6.04c	SPCC188.10c	plb1	SPCC188.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.43094556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772350	2542497	2543477	278956	279897	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAPB2B4.04c	plb1	SPAPB2B4.04c	-	pmc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.327859523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772351	2542497	2540930	278956	277446	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC354.10	plb1	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440191485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772352	2542497	2540946	278956	277462	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC36.04	plb1	cys11	-	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.34913357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772353	2542497	2540821	278956	277339	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC800.03	plb1	clr3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923762779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772354	2542497	2542759	278956	279209	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAC9G1.07	plb1	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.772270873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772355	2542497	2540809	278956	277328	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC18A7.01	plb1	SPBC18A7.01	-	SPBC4F6.19c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.202451695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772356	2542497	2542286	278956	278754	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAC1786.01c	plb1	ptl2	-	SPAC1786.01c|SPAC31G5.20c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.506017097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772357	2542497	2542883	278956	279328	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAC1486.04c	plb1	alm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.907139159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772358	2542497	2542881	278956	279326	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAC13F5.03c	plb1	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.692725792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772359	2542497	2539925	278956	276469	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC16H5.13	plb1	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924290975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772360	2542497	2543304	278956	279728	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAC6B12.12	plb1	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452176191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772361	2542497	2540998	278956	277514	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC3D6.05	plb1	ptp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.051616297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772362	2542497	2541358	278956	277869	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBP4H10.16c	plb1	SPBP4H10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.50263663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772363	2542497	2541103	278956	277618	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC651.06	plb1	mug166	-	csa1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927388527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772364	2542497	2542955	278956	279395	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAC11E3.12	plb1	SPAC11E3.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091791034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772365	2542497	2540891	278956	277407	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC582.08	plb1	SPBC582.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.661131592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772366	2542497	2541229	278956	277743	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC839.05c	plb1	rps1701	-	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63470869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772367	2542497	2539729	278956	276281	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC11B10.07c	plb1	ivn1	-	pi004|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811721379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772368	2542497	2542826	278956	279273	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAC13G6.09	plb1	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.69925408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772369	2542497	2539668	278956	276223	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC11B10.10c	plb1	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.692078393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772370	2542497	2540245	278956	276777	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC31F10.17c	plb1	SPBC31F10.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.19468974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772371	2542497	2541122	278956	277637	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC646.06c	plb1	agn2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986139091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772372	2542497	3361117	278956	280193	SPAC1A6.04c	SPCC663.17	plb1	wtf15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92319055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772373	2542497	2539375	278956	275941	SPAC1A6.04c	SPCC4G3.11	plb1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.688451328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772374	2542497	2541238	278956	277752	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC8E4.05c	plb1	SPBC8E4.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330896294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772375	2542497	2540314	278956	276844	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC2G5.03	plb1	ctu1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813342145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772376	2542497	2542424	278956	278886	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAC1805.14	plb1	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913460502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772377	2542497	2541867	278956	278357	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAC22E12.14c	plb1	sck2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931175385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772378	2542497	2541502	278956	278004	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAC23D3.04c	plb1	gpd2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.819098505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772379	2542497	2540309	278956	276839	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC21B10.13c	plb1	yox1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.064795691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772380	2542497	2539211	278956	275781	SPAC1A6.04c	SPCC1739.08c	plb1	SPCC1739.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81872631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772381	2542497	2541904	278956	278394	SPAC1A6.04c	SPAC22F8.03c	plb1	SPAC22F8.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.624026221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772382	2542497	2542943	278956	279384	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC1348.03	plb1	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.914407221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772383	2542497	2541576	278956	278073	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC1348.02	plb1	SPBC1348.02	-	SPAC1348.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.192654059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772384	2542497	2541062	278956	277577	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC660.11	plb1	tcg1	-	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.05305603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772385	2542497	2540787	278956	277306	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC1921.07c	plb1	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.005571815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772386	2542497	2539708	278956	276261	SPAC1A6.04c	SPBC1861.06c	plb1	mug131	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.463820326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772387	2539145	2541257	275717	277771	SPCC18.11c	SPBP23A10.14c	sdc1	ell1	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699378601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772388	2539145	2540060	275717	276598	SPCC18.11c	SPBC106.01	sdc1	mph1	dpy30	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.847506122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772389	2539145	2543529	275717	279947	SPCC18.11c	SPAC4C5.02c	sdc1	ryh1	dpy30	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.480188191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772390	2539145	2542518	275717	278976	SPCC18.11c	SPAC1B3.16c	sdc1	vht1	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.251214942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772391	2539145	2541818	275717	278309	SPCC18.11c	SPAC11G7.02	sdc1	pub1	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387417617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772392	2539145	2539930	275717	276474	SPCC18.11c	SPBC1198.11c	sdc1	reb1	dpy30	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.114073031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772393	2539145	3361561	275717	280637	SPCC18.11c	SPAC11E3.01c	sdc1	swr1	dpy30	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.164994777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772394	2539145	2541117	275717	277632	SPCC18.11c	SPBC646.13	sdc1	sds23	dpy30	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.185199877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772395	2539145	2540347	275717	276876	SPCC18.11c	SPBC30B4.08	sdc1	eri1	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.747210335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772396	2539145	2540686	275717	277211	SPCC18.11c	SPBC21D10.10	sdc1	bdc1	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.180568782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772397	2539145	2542613	275717	279067	SPCC18.11c	SPAC18B11.03c	sdc1	SPAC18B11.03c	dpy30	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933953879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772398	2539145	2539226	275717	275796	SPCC18.11c	SPCC16C4.20c	sdc1	SPCC16C4.20c	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.498662445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772399	2539145	2542468	275717	278929	SPCC18.11c	SPAC1D4.09c	sdc1	rtf2	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.403389857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772400	2539145	2539564	275717	276125	SPCC18.11c	SPCC550.12	sdc1	arp6	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.864143972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772401	2539145	2542689	275717	279142	SPCC18.11c	SPAC29B12.04	sdc1	snz1	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.056951337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772402	2539145	2539434	275717	275997	SPCC18.11c	SPCC757.09c	sdc1	rnc1	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.226843812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772403	2539145	2540993	275717	277509	SPCC18.11c	SPBC342.01c	sdc1	alg6	dpy30	SPBC3F6.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933083716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772404	2539145	2540727	275717	277250	SPCC18.11c	SPBC1921.03c	sdc1	mex67	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258455395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772405	2539145	2540425	275717	276953	SPCC18.11c	SPBC27.06c	sdc1	mgr2	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328177608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772406	2539145	2541424	275717	277929	SPCC18.11c	SPAC23G3.04	sdc1	ies4	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.777962156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772407	2539145	2542277	275717	278746	SPCC18.11c	SPAC17A5.02c	sdc1	dbr1	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.439993785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772408	2539145	2539823	275717	276373	SPCC18.11c	SPBC16A3.18	sdc1	cip1	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701323855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772409	2539145	2543308	275717	279732	SPCC18.11c	SPAC694.04c	sdc1	SPAC694.04c	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.74820026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772410	2539145	2540595	275717	277121	SPCC18.11c	SPBC21C3.02c	sdc1	dep1	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.26004318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772411	2539145	2543326	275717	279749	SPCC18.11c	SPAC56F8.12	sdc1	SPAC56F8.12	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.277218184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772412	2539145	2539244	275717	275814	SPCC18.11c	SPCC1672.06c	sdc1	asp1	dpy30	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.537909172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772413	2539145	2543563	275717	279979	SPCC18.11c	SPAC664.02c	sdc1	arp8	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.252739299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772414	2539145	2543426	275717	279846	SPCC18.11c	SPAC631.02	sdc1	bdf2	dpy30	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.608060675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772415	2539145	2539352	275717	275918	SPCC18.11c	SPCC188.07	sdc1	ccq1	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.763320168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772416	2539145	2543319	275717	279743	SPCC18.11c	SPAC6B12.09	sdc1	trm10	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77245506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772417	2539145	2538906	275717	275483	SPCC18.11c	SPCC1259.03	sdc1	rpa12	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.629888577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772418	2539145	2540825	275717	277343	SPCC18.11c	SPBC428.08c	sdc1	clr4	dpy30	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927377133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772419	2539145	3361543	275717	280619	SPCC18.11c	SPAC9.13c	sdc1	cwf16	dpy30	SPAPJ735.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.439886151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772420	2539145	2540964	275717	277480	SPCC18.11c	SPBC365.16	sdc1	SPBC365.16	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38476454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772421	2539145	2542239	275717	278711	SPCC18.11c	SPAC18G6.02c	sdc1	chp1	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.264600315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772422	2539145	2539023	275717	275596	SPCC18.11c	SPCC594.05c	sdc1	spf1	dpy30	spp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.14333205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772423	2539145	3361461	275717	280537	SPCC18.11c	SPAC11H11.01	sdc1	sst6	dpy30	cps23	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.836943864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772424	2539145	2539705	275717	276258	SPCC18.11c	SPBC1105.10	sdc1	rav1	dpy30	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92949368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772425	2539145	2543020	275717	279456	SPCC18.11c	SPAC10F6.13c	sdc1	SPAC10F6.13c	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.691468637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772426	2539145	2540797	275717	277316	SPCC18.11c	SPBC18H10.11c	sdc1	ppr2	dpy30	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.513023253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772427	2539145	2541776	275717	278270	SPCC18.11c	SPAC23H3.05c	sdc1	swd1	dpy30	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.288584935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772428	2539145	2542507	275717	278965	SPCC18.11c	SPAC18G6.13	sdc1	SPAC18G6.13	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.885633164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772429	2539145	2543412	275717	279834	SPCC18.11c	SPAC637.07	sdc1	moe1	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.167076979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772430	2539145	2539733	275717	276285	SPCC18.11c	SPBC16E9.12c	sdc1	pab2	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.725567013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772431	2539145	2540673	275717	277198	SPCC18.11c	SPBC1D7.03	sdc1	mug80	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.88765482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772432	2539145	2543667	275717	280081	SPCC18.11c	SPAC4H3.02c	sdc1	swc3	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.493672489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772433	2539145	2543643	275717	280057	SPCC18.11c	SPAC3G9.07c	sdc1	hos2	dpy30	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.692651184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772434	2539145	2541899	275717	278389	SPCC18.11c	SPAC22E12.11c	sdc1	set3	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.762821967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772435	2539145	2540086	275717	276624	SPCC18.11c	SPBC16H5.12c	sdc1	SPBC16H5.12c	dpy30	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819006917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772436	2539145	2540231	275717	276763	SPCC18.11c	SPBC336.14c	sdc1	ppk26	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582250114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772437	2539145	2541710	275717	278205	SPCC18.11c	SPAC343.11c	sdc1	msc1	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.787190311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772438	2539145	2539667	275717	276222	SPCC18.11c	SPBC13G1.08c	sdc1	ash2	dpy30	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093838199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772439	2539145	2542976	275717	279414	SPCC18.11c	SPAC9E9.09c	sdc1	atd1	dpy30	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.550252925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772440	2539145	2539974	275717	276518	SPCC18.11c	SPBC32H8.07	sdc1	git5	dpy30	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926087571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772441	2539145	2540836	275717	277354	SPCC18.11c	SPBC18H10.19	sdc1	vps38	dpy30	atg14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2053411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772442	2539145	5802861	275717	857999	SPCC18.11c	SPAC1D4.01	sdc1	tls1	dpy30	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.00002708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772443	2539145	2539953	275717	276497	SPCC18.11c	SPBC1709.11c	sdc1	png2	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.27345731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772444	2539145	2543443	275717	279863	SPCC18.11c	SPAC3H1.12c	sdc1	snt2	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.743583608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772445	2539145	2541694	275717	278190	SPCC18.11c	SPAC1071.04c	sdc1	spc2	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51246768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772446	2539145	2541464	275717	277966	SPCC18.11c	SPAC222.08c	sdc1	SPAC222.08c	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.187175516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772447	2539145	2541053	275717	277568	SPCC18.11c	SPBC56F2.10c	sdc1	alg5	dpy30	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.202801988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772448	2539145	2540599	275717	277125	SPCC18.11c	SPBC29A3.10c	sdc1	atp14	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.555009292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772449	2539145	2543315	275717	279739	SPCC18.11c	SPAC6B12.07c	sdc1	SPAC6B12.07c	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32770968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772450	2539145	2541337	275717	277848	SPCC18.11c	SPBP35G2.13c	sdc1	swc2	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.323679817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772451	2539145	2540930	275717	277446	SPCC18.11c	SPBC354.10	sdc1	def1	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769525181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772452	2539145	2540821	275717	277339	SPCC18.11c	SPBC800.03	sdc1	clr3	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.132339593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772453	2539145	2542806	275717	279254	SPCC18.11c	SPAC1610.01	sdc1	saf5	dpy30	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.984627228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772454	2539145	2543332	275717	279755	SPCC18.11c	SPAPB8E5.04c	sdc1	SPAPB8E5.04c	dpy30	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808642764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772455	2539145	2538762	275717	275345	SPCC18.11c	SPCC306.04c	sdc1	set1	dpy30	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.671943542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772456	2539145	2543628	275717	280042	SPCC18.11c	SPAC3H8.10	sdc1	spo20	dpy30	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638644845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772457	2539145	2540498	275717	277026	SPCC18.11c	SPBC27.02c	sdc1	ask1	dpy30	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.027000793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772458	2539145	2540464	275717	276992	SPCC18.11c	SPBC23E6.02	sdc1	rrp2	dpy30	SPBC23E6.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44790222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772459	2539145	2540531	275717	277059	SPCC18.11c	SPBC23E6.08	sdc1	sat1	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2156381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772460	2539145	2541531	275717	278031	SPCC18.11c	SPAC25A8.01c	sdc1	fft3	dpy30	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.814762153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772461	2539145	2541470	275717	277972	SPCC18.11c	SPAPYUG7.04c	sdc1	rpb9	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.555793599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772462	2539145	2540699	275717	277223	SPCC18.11c	SPBC800.08	sdc1	gcd10	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703005042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772463	2539145	2540325	275717	276855	SPCC18.11c	SPBC21B10.10	sdc1	rps402	dpy30	rps4-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.335914387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772464	2539145	2542418	275717	278881	SPCC18.11c	SPAC1805.07c	sdc1	dad2	dpy30	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.64828816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772465	2539145	2542222	275717	278695	SPCC18.11c	SPAC31G5.18c	sdc1	sde2	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.201780013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772466	2539145	2542826	275717	279273	SPCC18.11c	SPAC13G6.09	sdc1	SPAC13G6.09	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.471856334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772467	2539145	2539668	275717	276223	SPCC18.11c	SPBC11B10.10c	sdc1	pht1	dpy30	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.003037205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772468	2539145	2541789	275717	278281	SPCC18.11c	SPAC23H4.08	sdc1	iwr1	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852218828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772469	2539145	2540333	275717	276863	SPCC18.11c	SPBC21B10.07	sdc1	SPBC21B10.07	dpy30	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819907337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772470	2539145	2538840	275717	275421	SPCC18.11c	SPCC736.07c	sdc1	SPCC736.07c	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.228919434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772471	2539145	2542716	275717	279169	SPCC18.11c	SPAC25H1.07	sdc1	emc1	dpy30	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926350319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772472	2539145	2542886	275717	279331	SPCC18.11c	SPAC1486.01	sdc1	SPAC1486.01	dpy30	sod2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.689339378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772473	2539145	2541478	275717	277980	SPCC18.11c	SPAC2F7.17	sdc1	mrf1	dpy30	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769650897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772474	2539145	2543372	275717	279794	SPCC18.11c	SPAPB1A10.09	sdc1	ase1	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.693691528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772475	2539145	2541124	275717	277639	SPCC18.11c	SPBC646.02	sdc1	cwf11	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.116847987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772476	2539145	2542943	275717	279384	SPCC18.11c	SPBC1348.03	sdc1	SPBC1348.03	dpy30	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.877259016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772477	2539145	2543472	275717	279892	SPCC18.11c	SPAC959.04c	sdc1	omh6	dpy30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.334661015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772478	2539145	2540787	275717	277306	SPCC18.11c	SPBC1921.07c	sdc1	sgf29	dpy30	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048801642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772479	2543304	2542072	279728	278549	SPAC6B12.12	SPAP32A8.03c	tom70	bop1	-	SPAP32A8.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.229105594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772480	2543304	2543565	279728	279981	SPAC6B12.12	SPAPB24D3.04c	tom70	mag1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.282040768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772481	2543304	2541495	279728	277997	SPAC6B12.12	SPAP8A3.02c	tom70	ofd2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.023010935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772482	2543304	2541902	279728	278392	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC27E2.07	tom70	pvg2	-	mug53	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.260959585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772483	2543304	2538721	279728	275305	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC1494.10	tom70	adn3	-	SPCC70.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.383484696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772484	2543304	2538796	279728	275377	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC63.06	tom70	SPCC63.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.132490339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772485	2543304	2539584	279728	276143	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC63.03	tom70	SPCC63.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.976699942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772486	2543304	2541204	279728	277718	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC839.06	tom70	cta3	-	SPBC24E9.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.339585399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772487	2543304	2542430	279728	278892	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC17G6.06	tom70	rps2401	-	rps24|rps24-1|rps24a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.748750896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772488	2543304	2542577	279728	279033	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC19G12.15c	tom70	tpp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.265431137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772489	2543304	2540789	279728	277308	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC19C2.06c	tom70	mug124	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.021472685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772490	2543304	2540833	279728	277351	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC18H10.20c	tom70	any1	-	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.184949648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772491	2543304	2542291	279728	278759	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC17C9.08	tom70	pnu1	-	end1|nuc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.330532042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772492	2543304	2539949	279728	276493	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1703.04	tom70	mlh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.249996899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772493	2543304	2543634	279728	280048	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC3H8.04	tom70	SPAC3H8.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.437569044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772494	2543304	2541985	279728	278470	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC20G8.04c	tom70	SPAC20G8.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091247145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772495	2543304	2541145	279728	277660	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC651.12c	tom70	dbl7	-	SPBC651.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.962478512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772496	2543304	2542066	279728	278543	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC227.05	tom70	SPAC227.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.228166011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772497	2543304	2541426	279728	277931	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC227.06	tom70	SPAC227.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813566367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772498	2543304	2540956	279728	277472	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC409.06	tom70	uch2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.877448186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772499	2543304	2542713	279728	279166	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC29B12.12	tom70	SPAC29B12.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.197368683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772500	2543304	2543064	279728	279497	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC3G6.01	tom70	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.934079468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772501	2543304	2540131	279728	276668	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1778.05c	tom70	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.77072869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772502	2543304	2539855	279728	276403	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC14F5.07	tom70	doa10	-	ssm4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.185033936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772503	2543304	2540524	279728	277052	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC21B10.08c	tom70	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154486812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772504	2543304	2543524	279728	279942	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC4D7.07c	tom70	csi2	-	SPAC4D7.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380584887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772505	2543304	2539035	279728	275608	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC794.09c	tom70	tef101	-	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.613497752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772506	2543304	2540198	279728	276731	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1709.04c	tom70	cyp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195939356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772507	2543304	2541621	279728	278118	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC29A4.17c	tom70	SPAC29A4.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.195747832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772508	2543304	2538896	279728	275474	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC584.11c	tom70	SPCC584.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.743655089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772509	2543304	2541135	279728	277650	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC839.03c	tom70	SPBC839.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.14752511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772510	2543304	2539876	279728	276422	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1734.07c	tom70	trs8502	-	SPBC1734.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041680362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772511	2543304	2541134	279728	277649	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC776.16	tom70	mis20	-	SPBC776.16|eic2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1974524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772512	2543304	2540068	279728	276606	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1734.12c	tom70	alg12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.183100459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772513	2543304	2539939	279728	276483	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC11G11.01	tom70	fis1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095551734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772514	2543304	2541438	279728	277943	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC23G3.10c	tom70	ssr3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.718794637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772515	2543304	2541853	279728	278344	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC2F3.11	tom70	SPAC2F3.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.975128858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772516	2543304	2543559	279728	279975	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC664.04c	tom70	rps1602	-	rps16|rps16-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.816793957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772517	2543304	2540433	279728	276961	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC2D10.06	tom70	rep1	-	rec16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851006192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772518	2543304	2540296	279728	276827	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC2D10.05	tom70	exg3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.258352607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772519	2543304	2543356	279728	279778	SPAC6B12.12	SPAPB2C8.01	tom70	SPAPB2C8.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.69888785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772520	2543304	2542747	279728	279197	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC15A10.06	tom70	SPAC15A10.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.23431858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772521	2543304	2540347	279728	276876	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC30B4.08	tom70	eri1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.01581468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772522	2543304	2543527	279728	279945	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC4C5.01	tom70	SPAC4C5.01	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.350812661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772523	2543304	2543652	279728	280066	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC4H3.03c	tom70	SPAC4H3.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.030256591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772524	2543304	2540402	279728	276930	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC30D10.05c	tom70	SPBC30D10.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.670195087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772525	2543304	2541066	279728	277581	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC543.02c	tom70	SPBC543.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875837695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772526	2543304	2540686	279728	277211	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC21D10.10	tom70	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.359852006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772527	2543304	2539028	279728	275601	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC1281.07c	tom70	SPCC1281.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442076181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772528	2543304	2539890	279728	276436	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC16C6.03c	tom70	SPBC16C6.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.769631923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772529	2543304	2539263	279728	275833	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC895.09c	tom70	ucp12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639078891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772530	2543304	2540717	279728	277240	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC577.12	tom70	dph6	-	mug71	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154782898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772531	2543304	2541098	279728	277613	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC577.13	tom70	syj2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.718105266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772532	2543304	2540579	279728	277105	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC28E12.02	tom70	SPBC28E12.02	-	SPBC9B6.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045176171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772533	2543304	2540491	279728	277019	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC28E12.04	tom70	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.501569858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772534	2543304	2539309	279728	275876	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC4G3.19	tom70	alp16	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.400756703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772535	2543304	2540535	279728	277062	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC215.01	tom70	SPBC215.01	-	SPBC3B9.20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.943959195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772536	2543304	2540664	279728	277189	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC215.02	tom70	bob1	-	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.645338065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772537	2543304	2543320	279728	279744	SPAC6B12.12	SPAPJ695.01c	tom70	SPAPJ695.01c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.61849745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772538	2543304	2541361	279728	277872	SPAC6B12.12	SPBP8B7.10c	tom70	utp16	-	SPBP8B7.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.054513667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772539	2543304	2540999	279728	277515	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC4B4.04	tom70	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.484060375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772540	2543304	2542468	279728	278929	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1D4.09c	tom70	rtf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.795236234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772541	2543304	2541951	279728	278438	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC222.05c	tom70	mss1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.844758663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772542	2543304	2541208	279728	277722	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC887.04c	tom70	lub1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.085613977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772543	2543304	2541214	279728	277728	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC839.07	tom70	ibp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.559869723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772544	2543304	2541205	279728	277719	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC839.02	tom70	SPBC839.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.127720963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772545	2543304	2540979	279728	277495	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC3H7.10	tom70	elp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.336544619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772546	2543304	2538847	279728	275428	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC594.06c	tom70	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931097311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772547	2543304	2539443	279728	276006	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC736.02	tom70	SPCC736.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.618554498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772548	2543304	2541019	279728	277534	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC3B8.07c	tom70	dsd1	-	SDCB3B8.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812710327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772549	2543304	2541500	279728	278002	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC227.18	tom70	lys3	-	SPAC2F7.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.71957327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772550	2543304	2543156	279728	279587	SPAC6B12.12	SPAP8A3.13c	tom70	SPAP8A3.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924799682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772551	2543304	2541994	279728	278478	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC26A3.14c	tom70	SPAC26A3.14c	-	SPAC23A6.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.907774586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772552	2543304	2539235	279728	275805	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC1682.15	tom70	mug122	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.61941228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772553	2543304	2543260	279728	279688	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1002.17c	tom70	urg2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.401569758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772554	2543304	2543681	279728	280095	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC9.02c	tom70	SPAC9.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.269668579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772555	2543304	2542696	279728	279149	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC29B12.03	tom70	spd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.892406629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772556	2543304	2542299	279728	278766	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC18B11.10	tom70	tup11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872126082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772557	2543304	2542689	279728	279142	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC29B12.04	tom70	snz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.615179394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772558	2543304	2539472	279728	276035	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC794.03	tom70	SPCC794.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874152975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772559	2543304	2539434	279728	275997	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC757.09c	tom70	rnc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.284698965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772560	2543304	2543453	279728	279873	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC3G9.03	tom70	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.666201701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772561	2543304	2540692	279728	277217	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC800.07c	tom70	tsf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.144681254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772562	2543304	2542555	279728	279012	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1952.06c	tom70	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.609389756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772563	2543304	2540313	279728	276843	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC337.04	tom70	ppk27	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713049176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772564	2543304	2540417	279728	276945	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC21C3.06	tom70	SPBC21C3.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.980927323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772565	2543304	2539117	279728	275689	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC74.06	tom70	mak3	-	phk2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.394018315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772566	2543304	2542627	279728	279081	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC750.04c	tom70	SPAC750.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815239391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772567	2543304	2540095	279728	276633	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC115.03	tom70	SPBC115.03	-	SPBC839.18c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.510024873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772568	2543304	2539797	279728	276347	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC16G5.14c	tom70	rps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568795634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772569	2543304	2538833	279728	275414	SPAC6B12.12	SPCP1E11.11	tom70	puf6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.768256594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772570	2543304	2539575	279728	276135	SPAC6B12.12	SPCP20C8.02c	tom70	SPCP20C8.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.492646924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772571	2543304	2539937	279728	276481	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1539.08	tom70	arf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.259555182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772572	2543304	2543636	279728	280050	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC3H8.08c	tom70	SPAC3H8.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.027350209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772573	2543304	2542182	279728	278657	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC19B12.08	tom70	atg4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.564707013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772574	2543304	2539988	279728	276532	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1271.05c	tom70	SPBC1271.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.559618915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772575	2543304	2541669	279728	278165	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC22G7.07c	tom70	ime4	-	SPAC22G7.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.765153369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772576	2543304	2540676	279728	277201	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC3E7.11c	tom70	SPBC3E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.704778849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772577	2543304	2539302	279728	275870	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC126.09	tom70	zip2	-	SPCC126.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.715707858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772578	2543304	2540993	279728	277509	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC342.01c	tom70	alg6	-	SPBC3F6.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.075328395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772579	2543304	2542022	279728	278505	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC23A1.03	tom70	apt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.023524371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772580	2543304	2542165	279728	278641	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1782.08c	tom70	rex3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.328593311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772581	2543304	2541831	279728	278322	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC23G3.03	tom70	sib2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.333896534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772582	2543304	2541424	279728	277929	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC23G3.04	tom70	ies4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.893986141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772583	2543304	2542318	279728	278784	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC16C9.05	tom70	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.899599989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772584	2543304	2539365	279728	275931	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC24B10.16c	tom70	SPCC24B10.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.766236774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772585	2543304	2540295	279728	276826	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC3B8.05	tom70	SPBC3B8.05	-	dph1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.722406672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772586	2543304	2539792	279728	276342	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1271.14	tom70	SPBC1271.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981244489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772587	2543304	2541436	279728	277941	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC11H11.03c	tom70	SPAC11H11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.76038669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772588	2543304	2539441	279728	276004	SPAC6B12.12	SPCPJ732.02c	tom70	xks1	-	SPCPJ732.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.073492054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772589	2543304	2541692	279728	278188	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC29E6.07	tom70	SPAC29E6.07	-	SPAC30.11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98530913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772590	2543304	2540851	279728	277368	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC4F6.04	tom70	rpl2502	-	rpl23a-2|rpl25b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.865475226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772591	2543304	2541643	279728	278139	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC14C4.13	tom70	rad17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980462896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772592	2543304	2540663	279728	277188	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC56F2.06	tom70	mug147	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445412944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772593	2543304	2542644	279728	279098	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC24C9.16c	tom70	cox8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444618185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772594	2543304	2543108	279728	279540	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC3A12.13c	tom70	SPAC3A12.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.723674585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772595	2543304	2542146	279728	278622	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1B3.10c	tom70	SPAC1B3.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.222399784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772596	2543304	2539244	279728	275814	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC1672.06c	tom70	asp1	-	vip1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147974059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772597	2543304	2543551	279728	279968	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC4G8.06c	tom70	trm12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.619180489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772598	2543304	2543563	279728	279979	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC664.02c	tom70	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.037513609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772599	2543304	2538866	279728	275446	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC1620.12c	tom70	SPCC1620.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.071969736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772600	2543304	2543584	279728	279999	SPAC6B12.12	SPAPB1E7.11c	tom70	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.561574492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772601	2543304	2541905	279728	278395	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC6G9.01c	tom70	SPAC6G9.01c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.817409154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772602	2543304	2539100	279728	275672	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC330.12c	tom70	sdh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.019888994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772603	2543304	2540883	279728	277400	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC577.06c	tom70	stt4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439673351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772604	2543304	2542530	279728	278988	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1399.02	tom70	SPAC1399.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930150986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772605	2543304	2538972	279728	275546	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC1739.15	tom70	wtf21	-	wtf3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.983918153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772606	2543304	2538906	279728	275483	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC1259.03	tom70	rpa12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.716462252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772607	2543304	2542213	279728	278687	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC3G6.13c	tom70	rpl4101	-	rpl41-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.198917229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772608	2543304	2539478	279728	276041	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC550.07	tom70	SPCC550.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.841733977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772609	2543304	2539574	279728	276134	SPAC6B12.12	SPCPB16A4.04c	tom70	trm8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812032492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772610	2543304	2540319	279728	276849	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC30D10.16	tom70	pha2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.919018454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772611	2543304	2539310	279728	275877	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC285.17	tom70	spp27	-	uaf30	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.863764289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772612	2543304	2540340	279728	276869	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC2D10.15c	tom70	pth1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.340832834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772613	2543304	2542568	279728	279024	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1952.02	tom70	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.121437993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772614	2543304	2543573	279728	279988	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC869.11	tom70	cat1	-	SPAC922.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876048818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772615	2543304	2541275	279728	277789	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC947.06c	tom70	SPBC947.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.515837639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772616	2543304	2539237	279728	275807	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC24B10.13	tom70	skb5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.014835165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772617	2543304	2539388	279728	275953	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC24B10.12	tom70	cgi121	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982215671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772618	2543304	2541938	279728	278425	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC8C9.16c	tom70	mug63	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982312625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772619	2543304	2540834	279728	277352	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC18H10.18c	tom70	SPBC18H10.18c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811033837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772620	2543304	2543537	279728	279954	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC4D7.05	tom70	sum1	-	tif34	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.7166047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772621	2543304	2543514	279728	279932	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC4D7.03	tom70	pop2	-	sud1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.741965738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772622	2543304	2539705	279728	276258	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1105.10	tom70	rav1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.872987107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772623	2543304	2542950	279728	279390	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC12B10.03	tom70	bun62	-	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.016121997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772624	2543304	2542695	279728	279148	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC12B10.09	tom70	pet801	-	SPAC12B10.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.43547805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772625	2543304	2539021	279728	275594	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC1183.04c	tom70	pet127	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.809182947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772626	2543304	2539355	279728	275921	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC1840.08c	tom70	pdi5	-	SPCC1840.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.510514823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772627	2543304	2541035	279728	277550	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC3E7.05c	tom70	SPBC3E7.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.870107186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772628	2543304	2540631	279728	277157	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC25B2.10	tom70	SPBC25B2.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090783816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772629	2543304	2541801	279728	278292	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC2F7.08c	tom70	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.045804104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772630	2543304	2541249	279728	277763	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC947.01	tom70	alf1	-	SPBC947.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.381156258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772631	2543304	2538715	279728	275299	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC1223.05c	tom70	rpl3702	-	rpl37|rpl37-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.668194282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772632	2543304	2541250	279728	277764	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC8D2.17	tom70	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.878362413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772633	2543304	2542298	279728	278765	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC29A4.02c	tom70	SPAC29A4.02c	-	tef3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933353575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772634	2543304	2540192	279728	276725	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1215.01	tom70	shy1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.384445141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772635	2543304	2540241	279728	276773	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC32H8.11	tom70	mei4	-	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.559365539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772636	2543304	2541982	279728	278467	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC23A1.06c	tom70	cmk2	-	mkp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442891304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772637	2543304	2539845	279728	276393	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC12C2.02c	tom70	ste20	-	ste16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.733016855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772638	2543304	2539340	279728	275906	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC1906.04	tom70	wtf20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201695582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772639	2543304	2542755	279728	279205	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1687.10	tom70	mcp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874244401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772640	2543304	2541160	279728	277675	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC725.09c	tom70	hob3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.668921006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772641	2543304	2540348	279728	276877	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC29A10.05	tom70	exo1	-	mut2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035598199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772642	2543304	2538811	279728	275392	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC330.03c	tom70	SPCC330.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327331968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772643	2543304	2540338	279728	276867	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC2G2.13c	tom70	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.56188132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772644	2543304	2540546	279728	277073	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC25B2.06c	tom70	btb2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148388531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772645	2543304	2538706	279728	275290	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC338.08	tom70	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925300884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772646	2543304	2542699	279728	279152	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC5H10.07	tom70	SPAC5H10.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.329151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772647	2543304	2540352	279728	276881	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC215.03c	tom70	csn1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.315658966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772648	2543304	2539754	279728	276306	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC16C6.04	tom70	dbl6	-	SPBC16C6.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982613012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772649	2543304	2539733	279728	276285	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC16E9.12c	tom70	pab2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.765616868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772650	2543304	2540396	279728	276924	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC31F10.12	tom70	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.685142487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772651	2543304	2542971	279728	279410	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC105.02c	tom70	SPAC105.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.262252271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772652	2543304	2539073	279728	275645	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC1322.02	tom70	pxd1	-	SPCC1322.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.513842488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772653	2543304	2541889	279728	278379	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC2F7.03c	tom70	pom1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.199415991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772654	2543304	2542660	279728	279113	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC328.03	tom70	tps1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.130543853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772655	2543304	2540543	279728	277070	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC29A10.06c	tom70	ely5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.268406192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772656	2543304	2541928	279728	278416	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC227.03c	tom70	SPAC227.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.119174112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772657	2543304	2542168	279728	278643	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC17A5.16	tom70	ftp105	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933776519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772658	2543304	2542817	279728	279264	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC13G6.02c	tom70	rps101	-	rps1-1|rps3a-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.871402602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772659	2543304	2540403	279728	276931	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC21D10.11c	tom70	nfs1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.073230228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772660	2543304	2539044	279728	275617	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC338.11c	tom70	rrg1	-	uvi22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.331756515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772661	2543304	2542227	279728	278700	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC5H10.13c	tom70	gmh2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.122535332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772662	2543304	2541496	279728	277998	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC23D3.09	tom70	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.963065851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772663	2543304	2541388	279728	277899	SPAC6B12.12	SPBP8B7.30c	tom70	thi5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.617241358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772664	2543304	2543117	279728	279549	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC806.08c	tom70	mod21	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.950807609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772665	2543304	2543231	279728	279659	SPAC6B12.12	SPAPB8E5.08	tom70	SPAPB8E5.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148908835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772666	2543304	2539689	279728	276244	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1861.03	tom70	mak10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.269091448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772667	2543304	2541929	279728	278417	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC23C4.12	tom70	hhp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.063268063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772668	2543304	2542860	279728	279306	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC8C9.09c	tom70	mug129	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.488165801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772669	2543304	2538871	279728	275450	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC1259.14c	tom70	meu27	-	B8647-6	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714659088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772670	2543304	2539857	279728	276404	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1604.20c	tom70	tea2	-	klp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.076151186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772671	2543304	2541381	279728	277892	SPAC6B12.12	SPBPJ4664.05	tom70	SPBPJ4664.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193553126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772672	2543304	2542357	279728	278822	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1782.07	tom70	qcr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.009318804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772673	2543304	2541532	279728	278032	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC2C4.15c	tom70	ubx2	-	ucp13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.543110055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772674	2543304	2539233	279728	275803	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC16A11.03c	tom70	SPCC16A11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.53998549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772675	2543304	2540086	279728	276624	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC16H5.12c	tom70	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.774069549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772676	2543304	2541739	279728	278233	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC2G11.10c	tom70	SPAC2G11.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.508951747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772677	2543304	2540231	279728	276763	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC336.14c	tom70	ppk26	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.510034124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772678	2543304	2541710	279728	278205	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC343.11c	tom70	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.473154779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772679	2543304	2541983	279728	278468	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC20G8.08c	tom70	fft1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.663124687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772680	2543304	2540326	279728	276856	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC2G5.06c	tom70	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.830572282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772681	2543304	2542526	279728	278984	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC57A7.13	tom70	SPAC57A7.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.100152878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772682	2543304	2541401	279728	277910	SPAC6B12.12	SPBPB10D8.05c	tom70	SPBPB10D8.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.712514692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772683	2543304	2541830	279728	278321	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC5H10.01	tom70	SPAC5H10.01	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096429799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772684	2543304	2542782	279728	279231	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1687.06c	tom70	rpl44	-	rpl28	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.350864591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772685	2543304	2542126	279728	278602	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1B3.05	tom70	not3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.283903288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772686	2543304	2540200	279728	276733	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1709.06	tom70	dus2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.125724711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772687	2543304	2542528	279728	278986	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1B3.08	tom70	SPAC1B3.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.34960745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772688	2543304	2540665	279728	277190	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC83.02c	tom70	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.028324142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772689	2543304	2540997	279728	277513	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC3H7.06c	tom70	pof9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.38807111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772690	2543304	2538945	279728	275519	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC1739.06c	tom70	SPCC1739.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.8544538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772691	2543304	2542946	279728	279386	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC6F12.03c	tom70	fsv1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.969942083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772692	2543304	2539482	279728	276045	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC417.06c	tom70	mug27	-	ppk35|slk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.169604692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772693	2543304	2541451	279728	277956	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC23G3.02c	tom70	sib1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195194772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772694	2543304	2542933	279728	279374	SPAC6B12.12	SPAPYUG7.06	tom70	sdu1	-	mug67|hag1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.252552769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772695	2543304	2540961	279728	277477	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC36B7.03	tom70	sec63	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.412843246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772696	2543304	2538849	279728	275430	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC330.14c	tom70	rpl2402	-	rpl24-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.660034825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772697	2543304	2539224	279728	275794	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC16A11.01	tom70	SPCC16A11.01	-	SPCC63.15	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.823684988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772698	2543304	2543253	279728	279681	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC8C9.05	tom70	SPAC8C9.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.533545974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772699	2543304	2538841	279728	275422	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC550.03c	tom70	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.721467173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772700	2543304	2541248	279728	277762	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC8D2.10c	tom70	rmt3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.337822296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772701	2543304	2539232	279728	275802	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC1223.04c	tom70	set11	-	mug76	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.819189627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772702	2543304	2543378	279728	279800	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC3H8.07c	tom70	pac10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.895511146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772703	2543304	2542254	279728	278724	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC30D11.04c	tom70	nup124	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.198624518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772704	2543304	2541900	279728	278390	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC23H4.17c	tom70	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.298125673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772705	2543304	2540391	279728	276919	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC31F10.05	tom70	mug37	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.128749074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772706	2543304	2543234	279728	279662	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC977.11	tom70	SPAC977.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.436845917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772707	2543304	2543311	279728	279735	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC977.15	tom70	SPAC977.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.332976299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772708	2543304	2542529	279728	278987	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1B3.04c	tom70	SPAC1B3.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.077385326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772709	2543304	2542519	279728	278977	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC19G12.08	tom70	scs7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.71505874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772710	2543304	2543522	279728	279940	SPAC6B12.12	SPAPB24D3.08c	tom70	SPAPB24D3.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.916847364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772711	2543304	5802861	279728	857999	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1D4.01	tom70	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925032904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772712	2543304	2539953	279728	276497	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1709.11c	tom70	png2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.705229163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772713	2543304	2539715	279728	276268	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1778.09	tom70	SPBC1778.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.719461743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772714	2543304	2542437	279728	278899	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC17A5.01	tom70	pex6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.263487043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772715	2543304	2542439	279728	278901	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC17A5.08	tom70	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.566688287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772716	2543304	2541954	279728	278441	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC23C4.05c	tom70	SPAC23C4.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.911461627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772717	2543304	2538949	279728	275523	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC320.03	tom70	SPCC320.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.556441021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772718	2543304	2540990	279728	277506	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC36B7.06c	tom70	mug20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.660778509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772719	2543304	2541389	279728	277900	SPAC6B12.12	SPBPB2B2.09c	tom70	SPBPB2B2.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775325799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772720	2543304	2541694	279728	278190	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1071.04c	tom70	spc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.124307754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772721	2543304	2539317	279728	275883	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC16A11.08	tom70	atg20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199584911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772722	2543304	2540019	279728	276563	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1685.01	tom70	pmp1	-	dsp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.225303911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772723	2543304	2541112	279728	277627	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC725.07	tom70	pex5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.752651761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772724	2543304	2541536	279728	278036	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1071.02	tom70	mms19	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.517364068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772725	2543304	2540201	279728	276734	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC13A2.04c	tom70	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.503508659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772726	2543304	2541708	279728	278203	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC31A2.02	tom70	trm112	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.433404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772727	2543304	2543224	279728	279652	SPAC6B12.12	SPAPB8E5.10	tom70	SPAPB8E5.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.976097138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772728	2543304	2541464	279728	277966	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC222.08c	tom70	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.465254758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772729	2543304	2543059	279728	279493	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC30.04c	tom70	abc4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988429545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772730	2543304	2541410	279728	277918	SPAC6B12.12	SPBPB2B2.17c	tom70	SPBPB2B2.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.615830054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772731	2543304	2542597	279728	279051	SPAC6B12.12	SPAP8A3.07c	tom70	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.665058678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772732	2543304	2541281	279728	277794	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC902.04	tom70	rmn1	-	SPBC902.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.458705503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772733	2543304	2539847	279728	276395	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC530.14c	tom70	dsk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.943169656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772734	2543304	2539363	279728	275929	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC613.02	tom70	SPCC613.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635883696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772735	2543304	2540184	279728	276717	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC106.12c	tom70	SPBC106.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.513551079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772736	2543304	2541395	279728	277904	SPAC6B12.12	SPBP8B7.25	tom70	cyp4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.353113098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772737	2543304	2539052	279728	275625	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC663.09c	tom70	SPCC663.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.12723653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772738	2543304	2541296	279728	277808	SPAC6B12.12	SPBP8B7.06	tom70	rpp201	-	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.867365017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772739	2543304	2539427	279728	275992	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC663.15c	tom70	SPCC663.15c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.402496123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772740	2543304	2541266	279728	277780	SPAC6B12.12	SPBP16F5.05c	tom70	yar1	-	SPBP16F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.493691269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772741	2543304	2540844	279728	277361	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1921.04c	tom70	SPBC1921.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819593406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772742	2543304	2539711	279728	276264	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1683.09c	tom70	frp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.334636325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772743	2543304	2541680	279728	278176	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC22F8.09	tom70	rrp16	-	nop53	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.516843437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772744	2543304	2539498	279728	276061	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC645.11c	tom70	mug117	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.93011338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772745	2543304	2542550	279728	279007	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1B3.02c	tom70	SPAC1B3.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455171589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772746	2543304	2541746	279728	278240	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC20G4.04c	tom70	hus1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.864439618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772747	2543304	2539993	279728	276537	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1105.05	tom70	exg1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19588179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772748	2543304	2543049	279728	279484	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1296.04	tom70	mug65	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382154583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772749	2543304	2539812	279728	276362	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1347.02	tom70	fkbp39	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.431210464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772750	2543304	2540193	279728	276726	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1289.10c	tom70	adn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.041483911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772751	2543304	2539342	279728	275908	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC70.09c	tom70	mug9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813224072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772752	2543304	2542781	279728	279230	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC57A10.12c	tom70	ura3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634899691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772753	2543304	2540923	279728	277439	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC359.01	tom70	SPBC359.01	-	SPBPB10D8.08	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152787048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772754	2543304	2539527	279728	276089	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC338.16	tom70	pof3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.465935741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772755	2543304	2540757	279728	277278	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC20F10.03	tom70	SPBC20F10.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.560898811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772756	2543304	2541963	279728	278449	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC21E11.04	tom70	aca1	-	ppr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.825549082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772757	2543304	2541017	279728	277532	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC36.07	tom70	elp1	-	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.971884297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772758	2543304	2540946	279728	277462	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC36.04	tom70	cys11	-	cys1a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.486614702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772759	2543304	2542869	279728	279314	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC140.02	tom70	gar2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.564649964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772760	2543304	2541144	279728	277659	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC685.06	tom70	rps001	-	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.817659962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772761	2543304	2542673	279728	279126	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC26A3.11	tom70	SPAC26A3.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.850955524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772762	2543304	2541628	279728	278124	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC110.02	tom70	pds5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.774845423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772763	2543304	2541762	279728	278256	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC139.01c	tom70	SPAC139.01c	-	SPAC955.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.615651273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772764	2543304	2543493	279728	279913	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC4G8.08	tom70	SPAC4G8.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.046780107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772765	2543304	2539245	279728	275815	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC1322.07c	tom70	mug150	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.155641742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772766	2543304	2541713	279728	278208	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC3A12.12	tom70	atp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.843182988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772767	2543304	2539538	279728	276100	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC364.06	tom70	nap1	-	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.94468359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772768	2543304	2542283	279728	278751	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC27F1.08	tom70	pdt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.334896384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772769	2543304	2542806	279728	279254	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1610.01	tom70	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.410678492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772770	2543304	2538907	279728	275484	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC24B10.19c	tom70	nts1	-	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262174986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772771	2543304	2539160	279728	275732	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC18.17c	tom70	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932530034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772772	2543304	2541786	279728	278278	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC22F3.08c	tom70	rok1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.077343075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772773	2543304	2539842	279728	276390	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC14C8.15	tom70	SPBC14C8.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.744701061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772774	2543304	2541156	279728	277671	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC685.07c	tom70	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.92587248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772775	2543304	2539809	279728	276359	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC16E9.02c	tom70	SPBC16E9.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.476427767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772776	2543304	2543628	279728	280042	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC3H8.10	tom70	spo20	-	sec14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091830635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772777	2543304	2539101	279728	275673	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC736.04c	tom70	gma12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.19688608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772778	2543304	2543051	279728	279486	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1071.08	tom70	rpp203	-	rla6|rpp2-3|rpa2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.770576047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772779	2543304	2543275	279728	279703	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1002.05c	tom70	jmj2	-	kdm5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.095426007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772780	2543304	2539555	279728	276116	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC4B3.08	tom70	lsg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.565814081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772781	2543304	2540619	279728	277145	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC25H2.15	tom70	SPBC25H2.15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.513334706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772782	2543304	2542286	279728	278754	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1786.01c	tom70	ptl2	-	SPAC1786.01c|SPAC31G5.20c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.55991495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772783	2543304	2542767	279728	279217	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1565.07c	tom70	knd1	-	SPAC1565.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.539492856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772784	2543304	2541175	279728	277689	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC839.13c	tom70	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.432023449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772785	2543304	2539813	279728	276363	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC14C8.11c	tom70	SPBC14C8.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.754415027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772786	2543304	2543567	279728	279983	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC890.03	tom70	ppk16	-	mug92	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049819544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772787	2543304	2539108	279728	275680	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC1223.02	tom70	nmt1	-	thi3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.032158717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772788	2543304	2540498	279728	277026	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC27.02c	tom70	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.403095987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772789	2543304	2542883	279728	279328	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1486.04c	tom70	alm1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.516540207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772790	2543304	2540779	279728	277298	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC19F8.06c	tom70	meu22	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.510357912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772791	2543304	2540044	279728	276582	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1778.04	tom70	spo6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152282471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772792	2543304	2539925	279728	276469	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC16H5.13	tom70	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990268662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772793	2543304	2542515	279728	278973	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1952.09c	tom70	SPAC1952.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.190176988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772794	2543304	2539799	279728	276349	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC106.11c	tom70	plg7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.235624525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772795	2543304	2538717	279728	275301	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC1235.02	tom70	bio2	-	SPCC320.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81699593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772796	2543304	2542113	279728	278589	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1B3.11c	tom70	ypt4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.184187753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772797	2543304	2543160	279728	279591	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC31A2.14	tom70	bun107	-	wdr48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569418505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772798	2543304	2538962	279728	275536	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC965.13	tom70	SPCC965.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871068658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772799	2543304	2540657	279728	277182	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1E8.02	tom70	SPBC1E8.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81486205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772800	2543304	2541358	279728	277869	SPAC6B12.12	SPBP4H10.16c	tom70	SPBP4H10.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.979616148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772801	2543304	2540604	279728	277130	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC25D12.05	tom70	trm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.075207411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772802	2543304	2541103	279728	277618	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC651.06	tom70	mug166	-	csa1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.912225701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772803	2543304	2540935	279728	277451	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC359.04c	tom70	pfl7	-	SPBC359.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.769642715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772804	2543304	2541432	279728	277937	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1F5.05c	tom70	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.558234336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772805	2543304	2542472	279728	278933	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC9E9.13	tom70	wos2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.103244029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772806	2543304	2540089	279728	276627	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC32H8.01c	tom70	SPBC32H8.01c	-	SPBP22H7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389030736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772807	2543304	2538779	279728	275360	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC569.07	tom70	SPCC569.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517447414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772808	2543304	2538756	279728	275339	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC1795.10c	tom70	SPCC1795.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.977879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772809	2543304	2540421	279728	276949	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC2D10.19c	tom70	alb1	-	SPBC2D10.19c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.869949153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772810	2543304	2542306	279728	278773	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC29A4.11	tom70	rga3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.835002162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772811	2543304	2539029	279728	275602	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC61.05	tom70	SPCC61.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986974785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772812	2543304	2539359	279728	275925	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC16C4.06c	tom70	pus3	-	SPCC16C4.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.765740299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772813	2543304	2541948	279728	278435	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC222.13c	tom70	SPAC222.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931748436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772814	2543304	2540325	279728	276855	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC21B10.10	tom70	rps402	-	rps4-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.749569103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772815	2543304	2541797	279728	278288	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC22F3.04	tom70	mug62	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504194281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772816	2543304	2543480	279728	279900	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC688.03c	tom70	SPAC688.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991807723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772817	2543304	2541860	279728	278350	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC22F3.02	tom70	atf31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439641721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772818	2543304	2538915	279728	275492	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC23B6.02c	tom70	SPCC23B6.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.557353941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772819	2543304	2542042	279728	278523	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC23A1.14c	tom70	SPAC23A1.14c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869784432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772820	2543304	2541229	279728	277743	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC839.05c	tom70	rps1701	-	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.814365547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772821	2543304	2540677	279728	277202	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC21B10.03c	tom70	ath1	-	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.258280744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772822	2543304	2543091	279728	279524	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC12G12.15	tom70	sif3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.720903885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772823	2543304	2539772	279728	276323	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1734.05c	tom70	spf31	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.264806641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772824	2543304	2539188	279728	275759	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC1827.04	tom70	vms1	-	SPCC1827.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.124260984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772825	2543304	2542826	279728	279273	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC13G6.09	tom70	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.382646376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772826	2543304	2540569	279728	277096	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC660.17c	tom70	SPBC660.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92479455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772827	2543304	2539668	279728	276223	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC11B10.10c	tom70	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.372346218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772828	2543304	2543602	279728	280017	SPAC6B12.12	SPAPB1A11.04c	tom70	mca1	-	SPAPB1A11.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.031961361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772829	2543304	2540516	279728	277044	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC21C3.01c	tom70	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579342325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772830	2543304	2540064	279728	276602	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1718.02	tom70	hop1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.332800499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772831	2543304	2543183	279728	279612	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC3A12.06c	tom70	SPAC3A12.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.610874042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772832	2543304	2540928	279728	277444	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC3E7.10	tom70	fma1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.870078155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772833	2543304	2542303	279728	278770	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1687.21	tom70	SPAC1687.21	-	SPAC222.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324782192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772834	2543304	2540992	279728	277508	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC342.05	tom70	crb2	-	rhp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.542855136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772835	2543304	2543109	279728	279541	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC3G6.09c	tom70	tps2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.123039841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772836	2543304	2539488	279728	276051	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC645.08c	tom70	snd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320304405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772837	2543304	2543633	279728	280047	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC3H8.05c	tom70	mms1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994634665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772838	2543304	2540422	279728	276950	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC27.08c	tom70	sua1	-	SPBC28F2.01c|asp1|met3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.946238961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772839	2543304	2541356	279728	277867	SPAC6B12.12	SPBP35G2.12	tom70	SPBP35G2.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.907663863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772840	2543304	2541637	279728	278133	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC57A10.04	tom70	mug10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.259857292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772841	2543304	2540489	279728	277017	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC25H2.03	tom70	SPBC25H2.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.337503779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772842	2543304	2539205	279728	275775	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC4B3.15	tom70	mid1	-	dmf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.851588325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772843	2543304	2540563	279728	277090	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC25H2.09	tom70	SPBC25H2.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.229405543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772844	2543304	3361511	279728	280587	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC23C4.08	tom70	rho3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.797678346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772845	2543304	2542442	279728	278904	SPAC6B12.12	SPACUNK12.02c	tom70	cmk1	-	CaMK-I|SPAC25D11.02C	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.124389822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772846	2543304	2542904	279728	279348	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC144.11	tom70	rps1102	-	rps11|rps11-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.772012021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772847	2543304	2540380	279728	276909	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1A4.05	tom70	blt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.190309745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772848	2543304	2543124	279728	279556	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC3A11.06	tom70	mvp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636806643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772849	2543304	2540896	279728	277412	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC19C2.13c	tom70	ctu2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.228448253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772850	2543304	2539375	279728	275941	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC4G3.11	tom70	mug154	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.515447551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772851	2543304	2540146	279728	276683	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC17A3.06	tom70	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.714721506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772852	2543304	2539901	279728	276447	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC17A3.08	tom70	SPBC17A3.08	-	pi038	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.662227332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772853	2543304	2539178	279728	275749	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC1682.14	tom70	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.772588158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772854	2543304	2542871	279728	279316	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC6F12.10c	tom70	ade3	-	min11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.192534048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772855	2543304	2543337	279728	279760	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC959.08	tom70	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.458938836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772856	2543304	2542021	279728	278504	SPAC6B12.12	SPAP14E8.02	tom70	tos4	-	SPAP14E8.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.079531471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772857	2543304	2543486	279728	279906	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC959.07	tom70	rps403	-	rps4|rps4-3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.871347609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772858	2543304	2541398	279728	277907	SPAC6B12.12	SPBPB2B2.11	tom70	SPBPB2B2.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934902865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772859	2543304	2540504	279728	277032	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC24C6.10c	tom70	dip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711684144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772860	2543304	2540808	279728	277327	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC418.02	tom70	SPBC418.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.497645329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772861	2543304	2539253	279728	275823	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC1827.03c	tom70	SPCC1827.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981677807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772862	2543304	2542119	279728	278595	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1834.08	tom70	mak1	-	phk3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.926381149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772863	2543304	3361410	279728	280486	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1527.01	tom70	mok11	-	SPAC23D3.15	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932012078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772864	2543304	2539169	279728	275740	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC1235.11	tom70	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.273826451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772865	2543304	2538861	279728	275441	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC1620.11	tom70	nup97	-	mug87	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193376003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772866	2543304	2541151	279728	277666	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC713.03	tom70	SPBC713.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.146327299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772867	2543304	2542630	279728	279084	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC2C4.06c	tom70	SPAC2C4.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923007959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772868	2543304	2543513	279728	279931	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC821.06	tom70	spn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.497793152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772869	2543304	2538827	279728	275408	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC63.14	tom70	eis1	-	SPCC63.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.259536914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772870	2543304	2543327	279728	279750	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1D4.06c	tom70	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.746604011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772871	2543304	2540173	279728	276706	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC106.13	tom70	SPBC106.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.744580269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772872	2543304	2543087	279728	279520	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC30C2.04	tom70	SPAC30C2.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.817675894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772873	2543304	2541778	279728	278271	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC23G3.05c	tom70	SPAC23G3.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.921939569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772874	2543304	2539014	279728	275587	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC18B5.05c	tom70	SPCC18B5.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.659915589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772875	2543304	2541872	279728	278362	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC23H4.10c	tom70	thi4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.315026286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772876	2543304	2540496	279728	277024	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC800.11	tom70	SPBC800.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92167983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772877	2543304	2538920	279728	275497	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC1840.05c	tom70	SPCC1840.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.560434039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772878	2543304	2542830	279728	279277	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC57A10.08c	tom70	SPAC57A10.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.102887868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772879	2543304	2539583	279728	276142	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC777.04	tom70	SPCC777.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.20400078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772880	2543304	2539743	279728	276295	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC16A3.08c	tom70	oga1	-	SPBC16A3.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.078699901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772881	2543304	2542104	279728	278580	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC869.02c	tom70	SPAC869.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.391234981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772882	2543304	2541334	279728	277845	SPAC6B12.12	SPBP4H10.18c	tom70	SPBP4H10.18c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.339654912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772883	2543304	2541867	279728	278357	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC22E12.14c	tom70	sck2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.016757201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772884	2543304	2539588	279728	276146	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC962.04	tom70	rps1201	-	rps12|rps12-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.867285869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772885	2543304	2541646	279728	278142	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC750.06c	tom70	SPAC750.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.020460719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772886	2543304	2539085	279728	275657	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC285.15c	tom70	rps2802	-	rps28|rps28-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.875354871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772887	2543304	2543523	279728	279941	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC4F10.16c	tom70	SPAC4F10.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.337459872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772888	2543304	2539710	279728	276263	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1683.08	tom70	ght4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.742046105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772889	2543304	2539976	279728	276520	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1683.07	tom70	mal1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.96960339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772890	2543304	2543333	279728	279756	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC694.02	tom70	SPAC694.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.60928748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772891	2543304	2538834	279728	275415	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC126.08c	tom70	SPCC126.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.140236422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772892	2543304	2541320	279728	277832	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1271.03c	tom70	SPBC1271.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.550327618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772893	2543304	2541080	279728	277595	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC557.04	tom70	ppk29	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200686043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772894	2543304	2543090	279728	279523	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1348.01	tom70	SPBC1348.01	-	SPAC1348.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.076202622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772895	2543304	2540372	279728	276901	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC31F10.03	tom70	SPBC31F10.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.920863147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772896	2543304	2543448	279728	279868	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC3H5.07	tom70	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.721590007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772897	2543304	2540383	279728	276912	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC31E1.02c	tom70	pmr1	-	cps5|pgak2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.330899244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772898	2543304	2540859	279728	277376	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC4C3.09	tom70	SPBC4C3.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867162991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772899	2543304	2542440	279728	278902	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC17A2.12	tom70	rrp1	-	SPAC17A2.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.617225426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772900	2543304	2542656	279728	279110	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC2E1P3.05c	tom70	SPAC2E1P3.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922761444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772901	2543304	2539211	279728	275781	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC1739.08c	tom70	SPCC1739.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508616023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772902	2543304	3361295	279728	280371	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1921.01c	tom70	rpl35b	-	rpl37|rpl37-1|rpl3701|SPBC29C10.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925693686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772903	2543304	2543624	279728	280038	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC4D7.06c	tom70	SPAC4D7.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.871875435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772904	2543304	2539450	279728	276013	SPAC6B12.12	SPCP31B10.04	tom70	SPCP31B10.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.629712482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772905	2543304	2543472	279728	279892	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC959.04c	tom70	omh6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865939397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772906	2543304	2542680	279728	279133	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC26F1.09	tom70	gyp51	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.237410499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772907	2543304	2542094	279728	278571	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC29B12.06c	tom70	rcd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.70818467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772908	2543304	2541297	279728	277809	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC9B6.07	tom70	nop52	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.026008801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772909	2543304	2541062	279728	277577	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC660.11	tom70	tcg1	-	mug187	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.598948364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772910	2543304	2539738	279728	276290	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC17G9.09	tom70	tif213	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578478999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772911	2543304	2540787	279728	277306	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1921.07c	tom70	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.73704128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772912	2543304	2539494	279728	276057	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC4G3.08	tom70	psk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.331121427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772913	2543304	2540649	279728	277174	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC19F8.08	tom70	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.718760716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772914	2543304	2539292	279728	275860	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC4G3.02	tom70	aph1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.514664807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772915	2543304	2540736	279728	277259	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC19F8.02	tom70	SPBC19F8.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.074860701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772916	2539330	2543529	275896	279947	SPCC1753.03c	SPAC4C5.02c	rec7	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.179220656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772917	2539330	2541104	275896	277619	SPCC1753.03c	SPBC6B1.03c	rec7	SPBC6B1.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811990481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772918	2539330	2542357	275896	278822	SPCC1753.03c	SPAC1782.07	rec7	qcr8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926992551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772919	2539330	2540326	275896	276856	SPCC1753.03c	SPBC2G5.06c	rec7	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778413475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772920	2539330	2541156	275896	277671	SPCC1753.03c	SPBC685.07c	rec7	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634927531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772921	2539330	2543628	275896	280042	SPCC1753.03c	SPAC3H8.10	rec7	spo20	-	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567485124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772922	2543666	2542012	280080	278495	SPAC644.06c	SPAC23C11.02c	cdr1	rps23	nim1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.415461013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772923	2543666	2540727	280080	277250	SPAC644.06c	SPBC1921.03c	cdr1	mex67	nim1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.486129272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772924	2543666	2539244	280080	275814	SPAC644.06c	SPCC1672.06c	cdr1	asp1	nim1	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.017700123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772925	2543666	2542981	280080	279419	SPAC644.06c	SPAC824.02	cdr1	bst1	nim1	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.86030683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772926	2543666	2542268	280080	278737	SPAC644.06c	SPAC17A5.07c	cdr1	ulp2	nim1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.774778455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772927	2543666	2542177	280080	278652	SPAC644.06c	SPAC17H9.08	cdr1	SPAC17H9.08	nim1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.539190197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772928	2543666	2540882	280080	277399	SPAC644.06c	SPBC4F6.08c	cdr1	mrpl39	nim1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.345212257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772929	2543666	2539763	280080	276314	SPAC644.06c	SPBC1861.05	cdr1	SPBC1861.05	nim1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.335599314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772930	2543666	2540531	280080	277059	SPAC644.06c	SPBC23E6.08	cdr1	sat1	nim1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.39223864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772931	2543666	2541675	280080	278171	SPAC644.06c	SPAC22F8.12c	cdr1	shf1	nim1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.322126606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772932	2543666	2540309	280080	276839	SPAC644.06c	SPBC21B10.13c	cdr1	yox1	nim1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.674521415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772933	2538825	2543529	275406	279947	SPCC757.12	SPAC4C5.02c	SPCC757.12	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.61762682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772934	2538825	2542555	275406	279012	SPCC757.12	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC757.12	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.635776124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772935	2538825	2542189	275406	278664	SPCC757.12	SPAC17A5.09c	SPCC757.12	glc9	-	SPAC17A5.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379740447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772936	2538825	2542635	275406	279089	SPCC757.12	SPAC24H6.09	SPCC757.12	gef1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.952692942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772937	2538825	2543387	275406	279809	SPCC757.12	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC757.12	mcl1	-	slr3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.07671105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772938	2538825	2540320	275406	276850	SPCC757.12	SPBC3D6.04c	SPCC757.12	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.619366075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772939	2541140	2538939	277655	275514	SPBC713.07c	SPCC1672.04c	SPBC713.07c	SPCC1672.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.750809515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772940	2541140	2538796	277655	275377	SPBC713.07c	SPCC63.06	SPBC713.07c	SPCC63.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.993584049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772941	2541140	2542435	277655	278897	SPBC713.07c	SPAC1805.16c	SPBC713.07c	SPAC1805.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.850381314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772942	2541140	2541971	277655	278456	SPBC713.07c	SPAC27F1.05c	SPBC713.07c	SPAC27F1.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869567603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772943	2541140	2542812	277655	279259	SPBC713.07c	SPAC6F6.01	SPBC713.07c	cch1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392575832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772944	2541140	2540131	277655	276668	SPBC713.07c	SPBC1778.05c	SPBC713.07c	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.760378242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772945	2541140	2540168	277655	276703	SPBC713.07c	SPBC1683.06c	SPBC713.07c	SPBC1683.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.150742908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772946	2541140	2541066	277655	277581	SPBC713.07c	SPBC543.02c	SPBC713.07c	SPBC543.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57966656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772947	2541140	2540491	277655	277019	SPBC713.07c	SPBC28E12.04	SPBC713.07c	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093400854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772948	2541140	2539208	277655	275778	SPBC713.07c	SPCC1450.11c	SPBC713.07c	cek1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869942484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772949	2541140	2541891	277655	278381	SPBC713.07c	SPAC1F8.03c	SPBC713.07c	str3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.191107082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772950	2541140	2541086	277655	277601	SPBC713.07c	SPBC685.04c	SPBC713.07c	aps2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504833432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772951	2541140	2542107	277655	278583	SPBC713.07c	SPAC30.01c	SPBC713.07c	sec72	-	sec7b|sec702	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813711683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772952	2541140	2538801	277655	275382	SPBC713.07c	SPCC285.13c	SPBC713.07c	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.395067898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772953	2541140	2543048	277655	279483	SPBC713.07c	SPAC3F10.02c	SPBC713.07c	trk1	-	sptrk	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199585596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772954	2541140	2542022	277655	278505	SPBC713.07c	SPAC23A1.03	SPBC713.07c	apt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.710685063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772955	2541140	2539175	277655	275746	SPBC713.07c	SPCC16C4.01	SPBC713.07c	sif2	-	SPCC5E4.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579709479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772956	2541140	2543108	277655	279540	SPBC713.07c	SPAC3A12.13c	SPBC713.07c	SPAC3A12.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.48272914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772957	2541140	2538969	277655	275543	SPBC713.07c	SPCC1840.12	SPBC713.07c	opt3	-	SPCC1840.12|SPCC965.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812285123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772958	2541140	2542530	277655	278988	SPBC713.07c	SPAC1399.02	SPBC713.07c	SPAC1399.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258525309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772959	2541140	2539448	277655	276011	SPBC713.07c	SPCC825.04c	SPBC713.07c	naa40	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504294497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772960	2541140	2543514	277655	279932	SPBC713.07c	SPAC4D7.03	SPBC713.07c	pop2	-	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.255919286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772961	2541140	2540797	277655	277316	SPBC713.07c	SPBC18H10.11c	SPBC713.07c	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.559691813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772962	2541140	2538811	277655	275392	SPBC713.07c	SPCC330.03c	SPBC713.07c	SPCC330.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099986836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772963	2541140	2540886	277655	277403	SPBC713.07c	SPBC4F6.10	SPBC713.07c	vps901	-	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.559007441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772964	2541140	2539603	277655	276161	SPBC713.07c	SPBC1289.06c	SPBC713.07c	ppr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.687099509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772965	2541140	2538769	277655	275352	SPBC713.07c	SPCC126.04c	SPBC713.07c	sgf73	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.003931678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772966	2541140	2539667	277655	276222	SPBC713.07c	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC713.07c	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.440674395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772967	2541140	2542014	277655	278497	SPBC713.07c	SPAC20H4.04	SPBC713.07c	fml2	-	mfh2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.188354861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772968	2541140	2540997	277655	277513	SPBC713.07c	SPBC3H7.06c	SPBC713.07c	pof9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.055534573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772969	2541140	2541828	277655	278319	SPBC713.07c	SPAC22H12.05c	SPBC713.07c	fsc1	-	SPAC22H12.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815082934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772970	2541140	2542946	277655	279386	SPBC713.07c	SPAC6F12.03c	SPBC713.07c	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.766983211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772971	2541140	2542933	277655	279374	SPBC713.07c	SPAPYUG7.06	SPBC713.07c	sdu1	-	mug67|hag1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98986475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772972	2541140	2538723	277655	275307	SPBC713.07c	SPCC31H12.06	SPBC713.07c	mug111	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392419877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772973	2541140	2542867	277655	279312	SPBC713.07c	SPAC343.16	SPBC713.07c	lys2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865319205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772974	2541140	2543683	277655	280097	SPBC713.07c	SPAPB1E7.04c	SPBC713.07c	SPAPB1E7.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925940512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772975	2541140	2539376	277655	275942	SPBC713.07c	SPCC5E4.10c	SPBC713.07c	SPCC5E4.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.389510277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772976	2541140	2541389	277655	277900	SPBC713.07c	SPBPB2B2.09c	SPBC713.07c	SPBPB2B2.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.677717983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772977	2541140	2540201	277655	276734	SPBC713.07c	SPBC13A2.04c	SPBC713.07c	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986438542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772978	2541140	2540229	277655	276761	SPBC713.07c	SPBC31F10.15c	SPBC713.07c	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.742429397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772979	2541140	2542829	277655	279276	SPBC713.07c	SPAC13D6.02c	SPBC713.07c	byr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.29350005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772980	2541140	2539853	277655	276401	SPBC713.07c	SPBC1347.07	SPBC713.07c	rex2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.546793052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772981	2541140	2543139	277655	279571	SPBC713.07c	SPAC12G12.03	SPBC713.07c	cip2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709334794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772982	2541140	2539519	277655	276081	SPBC713.07c	SPCC364.05	SPBC713.07c	vps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.688334026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772983	2541140	2542759	277655	279209	SPBC713.07c	SPAC9G1.07	SPBC713.07c	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.920858915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772984	2541140	2542915	277655	279357	SPBC713.07c	SPAC6C3.06c	SPBC713.07c	SPAC6C3.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.681221859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772985	2541140	2538756	277655	275339	SPBC713.07c	SPCC1795.10c	SPBC713.07c	SPCC1795.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.405851491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772986	2541140	2542731	277655	279181	SPBC713.07c	SPAC5H10.09c	SPBC713.07c	SPAC5H10.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.261786007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772987	2541140	2538916	277655	275493	SPBC713.07c	SPCC16C4.17	SPBC713.07c	mug123	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.151320204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772988	2541140	2539182	277655	275753	SPBC713.07c	SPCC16A11.16c	SPBC713.07c	rpn1302	-	rpn13|rpn13b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.336957615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772989	2541140	3361476	277655	280552	SPBC713.07c	SPAC16A10.04	SPBC713.07c	rho4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980492121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772990	2541140	2540333	277655	276863	SPBC713.07c	SPBC21B10.07	SPBC713.07c	SPBC21B10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.915440101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772991	2541140	2543056	277655	279490	SPBC713.07c	SPAC3A11.04	SPBC713.07c	SPAC3A11.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819968282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772992	2541140	2543525	277655	279943	SPBC713.07c	SPAC4A8.14	SPBC713.07c	SPAC4A8.14	-	prs1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87609162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772993	2541140	2540551	277655	277078	SPBC713.07c	SPBC23E6.01c	SPBC713.07c	cxr1	-	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200946325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772994	2541140	2539037	277655	275610	SPBC713.07c	SPCC330.07c	SPBC713.07c	SPCC330.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6189144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772995	2541140	2541806	277655	278297	SPBC713.07c	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC713.07c	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.985852366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772996	2541140	2540309	277655	276839	SPBC713.07c	SPBC21B10.13c	SPBC713.07c	yox1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.648371236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772997	2541140	2542578	277655	279034	SPBC713.07c	SPAC18B11.09c	SPBC713.07c	SPAC18B11.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098443774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772998	2538853	2541117	275434	277632	SPCC1739.05	SPBC646.13	set5	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767334811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
772999	2538853	2539388	275434	275953	SPCC1739.05	SPCC24B10.12	set5	cgi121	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328087899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773000	2538853	2541250	275434	277764	SPCC1739.05	SPBC8D2.17	set5	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.385811919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773001	2538853	2538706	275434	275290	SPCC1739.05	SPCC338.08	set5	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.627882251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773002	2538853	2541283	275434	277796	SPCC1739.05	SPBP8B7.02	set5	rng9	-	SPBP8B7.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147678758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773003	2538853	2541017	275434	277532	SPCC1739.05	SPBC36.07	set5	elp1	-	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.838160883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773004	2538853	2543332	275434	279755	SPCC1739.05	SPAPB8E5.04c	set5	SPAPB8E5.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152446458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773005	2538853	2543628	275434	280042	SPCC1739.05	SPAC3H8.10	set5	spo20	-	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.263842779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773006	2538853	2543602	275434	280017	SPCC1739.05	SPAPB1A11.04c	set5	mca1	-	SPAPB1A11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.841269059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773007	2538853	2541808	275434	278299	SPCC1739.05	SPAC22A12.14c	set5	SPAC22A12.14c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983961303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773008	2538853	2540787	275434	277306	SPCC1739.05	SPBC1921.07c	set5	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454284747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773009	2541982	2538896	278467	275474	SPAC23A1.06c	SPCC584.11c	cmk2	SPCC584.11c	mkp2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453772933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773010	2541982	2539420	278467	275985	SPAC23A1.06c	SPCC970.07c	cmk2	raf2	mkp2	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.481331804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773011	2541982	2541208	278467	277722	SPAC23A1.06c	SPBC887.04c	cmk2	lub1	mkp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934036537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773012	2541982	2542555	278467	279012	SPAC23A1.06c	SPAC1952.06c	cmk2	SPAC1952.06c	mkp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.850424059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773013	2541982	2540825	278467	277343	SPAC23A1.06c	SPBC428.08c	cmk2	clr4	mkp2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.472051533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773014	2541982	2541786	278467	278278	SPAC23A1.06c	SPAC22F3.08c	cmk2	rok1	mkp2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.916941824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773015	2541982	2539101	278467	275673	SPAC23A1.06c	SPCC736.04c	cmk2	gma12	mkp2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.818004479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773016	2541982	2541175	278467	277689	SPAC23A1.06c	SPBC839.13c	cmk2	rpl1601	mkp2	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.443644621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773017	2541982	2543304	278467	279728	SPAC23A1.06c	SPAC6B12.12	cmk2	tom70	mkp2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442891304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773018	2541982	2541531	278467	278031	SPAC23A1.06c	SPAC25A8.01c	cmk2	fft3	mkp2	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.291943246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773019	2541982	2541789	278467	278281	SPAC23A1.06c	SPAC23H4.08	cmk2	iwr1	mkp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934519253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773020	2541982	2541806	278467	278297	SPAC23A1.06c	SPAC4G8.13c	cmk2	prz1	mkp2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.665044227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773021	2542683	2541117	279136	277632	SPAPYUG7.03c	SPBC646.13	mid2	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7883316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773022	2542683	2541345	279136	277856	SPAPYUG7.03c	SPBP35G2.07	mid2	ilv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331407749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773023	2542683	2541250	279136	277764	SPAPYUG7.03c	SPBC8D2.17	mid2	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.277175496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773024	2542683	2543144	279136	279576	SPAPYUG7.03c	SPAC3F10.05c	mid2	mug113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.481783171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773025	2542683	2542983	279136	279421	SPAPYUG7.03c	SPAC11D3.15	mid2	SPAC11D3.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.170405264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773026	2542683	2542549	279136	279006	SPAPYUG7.03c	SPAC19A8.11c	mid2	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.40235352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773027	2542683	2539715	279136	276268	SPAPYUG7.03c	SPBC1778.09	mid2	SPBC1778.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.718850162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773028	2542683	2541100	279136	277615	SPAPYUG7.03c	SPBC651.04	mid2	SPBC651.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.78337319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773029	2542369	2539564	278833	276125	SPAC1782.10c	SPCC550.12	nhp2	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868719591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773030	2542369	2542983	278833	279421	SPAC1782.10c	SPAC11D3.15	nhp2	SPAC11D3.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.491303546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773031	2542369	2542720	278833	279171	SPAC1782.10c	SPAC25G10.05c	nhp2	his1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390892748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773032	2542369	2541488	278833	277990	SPAC1782.10c	SPAC227.17c	nhp2	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.177962508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773033	2543281	2540910	279708	277426	SPAC23C4.18c	SPBC577.02	rad4	rpl3801	cut5|dpb11|dre3	rpl38-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.512409084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773034	2543281	2543628	279708	280042	SPAC23C4.18c	SPAC3H8.10	rad4	spo20	cut5|dpb11|dre3	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32836884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773035	2539999	2542577	276543	279033	SPBC1734.15	SPAC19G12.15c	rsc4	tpp1	brd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.345810107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773036	2539999	2543064	276543	279497	SPBC1734.15	SPAC3G6.01	rsc4	hrp3	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.096819605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773037	2539999	2542671	276543	279124	SPBC1734.15	SPAC824.09c	rsc4	SPAC824.09c	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.283374415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773038	2539999	2542237	276543	278709	SPBC1734.15	SPAC19E9.02	rsc4	fin1	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.345532801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773039	2539999	2539930	276543	276474	SPBC1734.15	SPBC1198.11c	rsc4	reb1	brd1	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.762432508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773040	2539999	3361561	276543	280637	SPBC1734.15	SPAC11E3.01c	rsc4	swr1	brd1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.432381291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773041	2539999	2540686	276543	277211	SPBC1734.15	SPBC21D10.10	rsc4	bdc1	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.105187567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773042	2539999	2539226	276543	275796	SPBC1734.15	SPCC16C4.20c	rsc4	SPCC16C4.20c	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700003226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773043	2539999	2540979	276543	277495	SPBC1734.15	SPBC3H7.10	rsc4	elp6	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451947373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773044	2539999	2539510	276543	276072	SPBC1734.15	SPCC4G3.04c	rsc4	coq5	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.443614722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773045	2539999	2543685	276543	280099	SPBC1734.15	SPAC3C7.03c	rsc4	rad55	brd1	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383919974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773046	2539999	2540595	276543	277121	SPBC1734.15	SPBC21C3.02c	rsc4	dep1	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.688116797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773047	2539999	2539244	276543	275814	SPBC1734.15	SPCC1672.06c	rsc4	asp1	brd1	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.914626863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773048	2539999	2543319	276543	279743	SPBC1734.15	SPAC6B12.09	rsc4	trm10	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.672542073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773049	2539999	2538906	276543	275483	SPBC1734.15	SPCC1259.03	rsc4	rpa12	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.865400756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773050	2539999	2541021	276543	277536	SPBC1734.15	SPBC3B8.10c	rsc4	nem1	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.916570337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773051	2539999	2540964	276543	277480	SPBC1734.15	SPBC365.16	rsc4	SPBC365.16	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.910879776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773052	2539999	2539023	276543	275596	SPBC1734.15	SPCC594.05c	rsc4	spf1	brd1	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.444228438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773053	2539999	2542036	276543	278518	SPBC1734.15	SPAC23A1.19c	rsc4	hrq1	brd1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.618443053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773054	2539999	2541664	276543	278160	SPBC1734.15	SPAC2H10.01	rsc4	SPAC2H10.01	brd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869293699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773055	2539999	2542513	276543	278971	SPBC1734.15	SPAC1952.05	rsc4	gcn5	brd1	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.279315246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773056	2539999	2541776	276543	278270	SPBC1734.15	SPAC23H3.05c	rsc4	swd1	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.326027815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773057	2539999	2539845	276543	276393	SPBC1734.15	SPBC12C2.02c	rsc4	ste20	brd1	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.414458816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773058	2539999	2541545	276543	278045	SPBC1734.15	SPAC22F8.07c	rsc4	rtf1	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327719028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773059	2539999	2540338	276543	276867	SPBC1734.15	SPBC2G2.13c	rsc4	dcd1	brd1	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.846221957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773060	2539999	2542123	276543	278599	SPBC1734.15	SPAC18G6.15	rsc4	mal3	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.670187218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773061	2539999	2539733	276543	276285	SPBC1734.15	SPBC16E9.12c	rsc4	pab2	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.741086853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773062	2539999	2540673	276543	277198	SPBC1734.15	SPBC1D7.03	rsc4	mug80	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.977008951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773063	2539999	2541578	276543	278075	SPBC1734.15	SPAC25B8.05	rsc4	deg1	brd1	SPAC25B8.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38839044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773064	2539999	2541496	276543	277998	SPBC1734.15	SPAC23D3.09	rsc4	arp42	brd1	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.792245385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773065	2539999	2539603	276543	276161	SPBC1734.15	SPBC1289.06c	rsc4	ppr8	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.051854602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773066	2539999	2539857	276543	276404	SPBC1734.15	SPBC1604.20c	rsc4	tea2	brd1	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.397065799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773067	2539999	2538994	276543	275568	SPBC1734.15	SPCC553.01c	rsc4	dbl2	brd1	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.316798949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773068	2539999	2540231	276543	276763	SPBC1734.15	SPBC336.14c	rsc4	ppk26	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711729096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773069	2539999	2539667	276543	276222	SPBC1734.15	SPBC13G1.08c	rsc4	ash2	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.801639264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773070	2539999	2542032	276543	278514	SPBC1734.15	SPAC23C11.04c	rsc4	pnk1	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.922247222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773071	2539999	2542007	276543	278490	SPBC1734.15	SPAC20H4.07	rsc4	rad57	brd1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.853316024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773072	2539999	2542214	276543	278688	SPBC1734.15	SPACUNK4.11c	rsc4	mpp6	brd1	SPACUNK4.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.258282635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773073	2539999	2543119	276543	279551	SPBC1734.15	SPAC3A11.07	rsc4	nde2	brd1	SPAC3A11.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98183032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773074	2539999	2539368	276543	275934	SPBC1734.15	SPCC16A11.07	rsc4	coq10	brd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.411360503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773075	2539999	2542597	276543	279051	SPBC1734.15	SPAP8A3.07c	rsc4	SPAP8A3.07c	brd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.025655718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773076	2539999	2541614	276543	278111	SPBC1734.15	SPAC29A4.20	rsc4	elp3	brd1	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.219394214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773077	2539999	2538690	276543	275275	SPBC1734.15	SPCC1393.05	rsc4	ers1	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.305206887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773078	2539999	2539519	276543	276081	SPBC1734.15	SPCC364.05	rsc4	vps3	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442360895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773079	2539999	2541713	276543	278208	SPBC1734.15	SPAC3A12.12	rsc4	atp11	brd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.943165472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773080	2539999	2538762	276543	275345	SPBC1734.15	SPCC306.04c	rsc4	set1	brd1	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.02411634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773081	2539999	2543628	276543	280042	SPBC1734.15	SPAC3H8.10	rsc4	spo20	brd1	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.435559382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773082	2539999	2540531	276543	277059	SPBC1734.15	SPBC23E6.08	rsc4	sat1	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509530557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773083	2539999	2541531	276543	278031	SPBC1734.15	SPAC25A8.01c	rsc4	fft3	brd1	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.842604302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773084	2539999	2540829	276543	277347	SPBC1734.15	SPBC800.09	rsc4	sum2	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.309511524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773085	2539999	2540677	276543	277202	SPBC1734.15	SPBC21B10.03c	rsc4	ath1	brd1	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319228325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773086	2539999	2540927	276543	277443	SPBC1734.15	SPBC365.06	rsc4	pmt3	brd1	smt3|ubl2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.554427895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773087	2539999	2540555	276543	277082	SPBC1734.15	SPBP16F5.02	rsc4	mcs2	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.31875042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773088	2539999	2543044	276543	279479	SPBC1734.15	SPAC3C7.12	rsc4	tip1	brd1	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.859008721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773089	2539999	2539205	276543	275775	SPBC1734.15	SPCC4B3.15	rsc4	mid1	brd1	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.837999605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773090	2539999	2539375	276543	275941	SPBC1734.15	SPCC4G3.11	rsc4	mug154	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.901039825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773091	2539999	2538840	276543	275421	SPBC1734.15	SPCC736.07c	rsc4	SPCC736.07c	brd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.619568006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773092	2539999	2542021	276543	278504	SPBC1734.15	SPAP14E8.02	rsc4	tos4	brd1	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.890374909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773093	2539999	2541675	276543	278171	SPBC1734.15	SPAC22F8.12c	rsc4	shf1	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.743096534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773094	2539999	2541806	276543	278297	SPBC1734.15	SPAC4G8.13c	rsc4	prz1	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.818279195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773095	2539999	2543372	276543	279794	SPBC1734.15	SPAPB1A10.09	rsc4	ase1	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.588645084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773096	2539999	2542656	276543	279110	SPBC1734.15	SPAC2E1P3.05c	rsc4	SPAC2E1P3.05c	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767223561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773097	2539999	2543472	276543	279892	SPBC1734.15	SPAC959.04c	rsc4	omh6	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.766311818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773098	2539999	2541297	276543	277809	SPBC1734.15	SPBC9B6.07	rsc4	nop52	brd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.274575942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773099	2539999	2542617	276543	279071	SPBC1734.15	SPAC13A11.01c	rsc4	rga8	brd1	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.071879052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773100	2539999	2540787	276543	277306	SPBC1734.15	SPBC1921.07c	rsc4	sgf29	brd1	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3254274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773101	2543563	2542585	279979	279040	SPAC664.02c	SPAC31A2.13c	arp8	sft1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633133732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773102	2543563	2540913	279979	277429	SPAC664.02c	SPBC56F2.08c	arp8	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.411198183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773103	2543563	2541818	279979	278309	SPAC664.02c	SPAC11G7.02	arp8	pub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.88225919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773104	2543563	2543064	279979	279497	SPAC664.02c	SPAC3G6.01	arp8	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.00851823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773105	2543563	2543339	279979	279762	SPAC664.02c	SPAC630.13c	arp8	tsc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.906776623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773106	2543563	3361561	279979	280637	SPAC664.02c	SPAC11E3.01c	arp8	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.181044926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773107	2543563	2542502	279979	278960	SPAC664.02c	SPAC139.06	arp8	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.77713358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773108	2543563	2540686	279979	277211	SPAC664.02c	SPBC21D10.10	arp8	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.2696191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773109	2543563	2542103	279979	278579	SPAC664.02c	SPAC31G5.11	arp8	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572006966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773110	2543563	2540455	279979	276983	SPAC664.02c	SPBC215.05	arp8	gpd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.84453544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773111	2543563	2540664	279979	277189	SPAC664.02c	SPBC215.02	arp8	bob1	-	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.480203045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773112	2543563	2543320	279979	279744	SPAC664.02c	SPAPJ695.01c	arp8	SPAPJ695.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.742486889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773113	2543563	2539226	279979	275796	SPAC664.02c	SPCC16C4.20c	arp8	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.983463722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773114	2543563	2542468	279979	278929	SPAC664.02c	SPAC1D4.09c	arp8	rtf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6789436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773115	2543563	2541208	279979	277722	SPAC664.02c	SPBC887.04c	arp8	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.203325871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773116	2543563	2539564	279979	276125	SPAC664.02c	SPCC550.12	arp8	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.208006761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773117	2543563	2539249	279979	275819	SPAC664.02c	SPCC1450.05c	arp8	rox3	-	med19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.26126318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773118	2543563	2540919	279979	277435	SPAC664.02c	SPBC543.07	arp8	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.024689493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773119	2543563	2539434	279979	275997	SPAC664.02c	SPCC757.09c	arp8	rnc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.892273335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773120	2543563	2539331	279979	275897	SPAC664.02c	SPCC24B10.09	arp8	rps1702	-	rps17|rps17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783563083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773121	2543563	2540220	279979	276753	SPAC664.02c	SPBC337.03	arp8	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.698367828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773122	2543563	2539575	279979	276135	SPAC664.02c	SPCP20C8.02c	arp8	SPCP20C8.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380325166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773123	2543563	2540425	279979	276953	SPAC664.02c	SPBC27.06c	arp8	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.4660031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773124	2543563	2542135	279979	278611	SPAC664.02c	SPAC13A11.04c	arp8	ubp8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989969508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773125	2543563	2541424	279979	277929	SPAC664.02c	SPAC23G3.04	arp8	ies4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.630928666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773126	2543563	2542318	279979	278784	SPAC664.02c	SPAC16C9.05	arp8	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.03179995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773127	2543563	2539175	279979	275746	SPAC664.02c	SPCC16C4.01	arp8	sif2	-	SPCC5E4.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.816292527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773128	2543563	2539244	279979	275814	SPAC664.02c	SPCC1672.06c	arp8	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.253532064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773129	2543563	2543584	279979	279999	SPAC664.02c	SPAPB1E7.11c	arp8	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.829775416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773130	2543563	2543319	279979	279743	SPAC664.02c	SPAC6B12.09	arp8	trm10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.654044511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773131	2543563	2538972	279979	275546	SPAC664.02c	SPCC1739.15	arp8	wtf21	-	wtf3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.986983629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773132	2543563	2538906	279979	275483	SPAC664.02c	SPCC1259.03	arp8	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.727866365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773133	2543563	2540964	279979	277480	SPAC664.02c	SPBC365.16	arp8	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.28220252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773134	2543563	2542568	279979	279024	SPAC664.02c	SPAC1952.02	arp8	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.275291645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773135	2543563	2539023	279979	275596	SPAC664.02c	SPCC594.05c	arp8	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.708208516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773136	2543563	2542036	279979	278518	SPAC664.02c	SPAC23A1.19c	arp8	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.916202012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773137	2543563	2539388	279979	275953	SPAC664.02c	SPCC24B10.12	arp8	cgi121	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.86413464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773138	2543563	2542311	279979	278777	SPAC664.02c	SPAC16A10.05c	arp8	dad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.528958711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773139	2543563	2543514	279979	279932	SPAC664.02c	SPAC4D7.03	arp8	pop2	-	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.841476331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773140	2543563	2539705	279979	276258	SPAC664.02c	SPBC1105.10	arp8	rav1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928610847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773141	2543563	2538715	279979	275299	SPAC664.02c	SPCC1223.05c	arp8	rpl3702	-	rpl37|rpl37-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440646202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773142	2543563	2542513	279979	278971	SPAC664.02c	SPAC1952.05	arp8	gcn5	-	kat2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.608737555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773143	2543563	2541776	279979	278270	SPAC664.02c	SPAC23H3.05c	arp8	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.043133996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773144	2543563	2543593	279979	280008	SPAC664.02c	SPAC4G9.10	arp8	arg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387774597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773145	2543563	2538706	279979	275290	SPAC664.02c	SPCC338.08	arp8	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780397839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773146	2543563	2540352	279979	276881	SPAC664.02c	SPBC215.03c	arp8	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.330546122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773147	2543563	2539733	279979	276285	SPAC664.02c	SPBC16E9.12c	arp8	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.635220626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773148	2543563	2540150	279979	276687	SPAC664.02c	SPBC16E9.14c	arp8	zrg17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454332497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773149	2543563	2542235	279979	278707	SPAC664.02c	SPAC18G6.05c	arp8	SPAC18G6.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642768419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773150	2543563	2543667	279979	280081	SPAC664.02c	SPAC4H3.02c	arp8	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453686428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773151	2543563	2539689	279979	276244	SPAC664.02c	SPBC1861.03	arp8	mak10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.518344132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773152	2543563	2543643	279979	280057	SPAC664.02c	SPAC3G9.07c	arp8	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.676060199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773153	2543563	2541899	279979	278389	SPAC664.02c	SPAC22E12.11c	arp8	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.047869338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773154	2543563	2540231	279979	276763	SPAC664.02c	SPBC336.14c	arp8	ppk26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507687888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773155	2543563	2539667	279979	276222	SPAC664.02c	SPBC13G1.08c	arp8	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.219270819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773156	2543563	2542126	279979	278602	SPAC664.02c	SPAC1B3.05	arp8	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.589657505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773157	2543563	2543244	279979	279672	SPAC664.02c	SPAC6B12.06c	arp8	rrg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.938517941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773158	2543563	2543378	279979	279800	SPAC664.02c	SPAC3H8.07c	arp8	pac10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.828826499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773159	2543563	2542214	279979	278688	SPAC664.02c	SPACUNK4.11c	arp8	mpp6	-	SPACUNK4.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580616531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773160	2543563	2539408	279979	275973	SPAC664.02c	SPCC576.12c	arp8	mhf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.845907763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773161	2543563	2542519	279979	278977	SPAC664.02c	SPAC19G12.08	arp8	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.840591367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773162	2543563	2539953	279979	276497	SPAC664.02c	SPBC1709.11c	arp8	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.474221942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773163	2543563	2542919	279979	279360	SPAC664.02c	SPAC6C3.08	arp8	nas6	-	SPAC6C3.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704087592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773164	2543563	2540990	279979	277506	SPAC664.02c	SPBC36B7.06c	arp8	mug20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.745199839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773165	2543563	2540342	279979	276871	SPAC664.02c	SPBC2G2.01c	arp8	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992609772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773166	2543563	2540599	279979	277125	SPAC664.02c	SPBC29A3.10c	arp8	atp14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.28915953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773167	2543563	2543517	279979	279935	SPAC664.02c	SPAC3G9.05	arp8	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.746568541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773168	2543563	2540184	279979	276717	SPAC664.02c	SPBC106.12c	arp8	SPBC106.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77562887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773169	2543563	2541283	279979	277796	SPAC664.02c	SPBP8B7.02	arp8	rng9	-	SPBP8B7.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.76671815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773170	2543563	2540533	279979	277061	SPAC664.02c	SPBC29A10.16c	arp8	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.27239894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773171	2543563	2541927	279979	278415	SPAC664.02c	SPAC222.12c	arp8	atp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.249193205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773172	2543563	2542829	279979	279276	SPAC664.02c	SPAC13D6.02c	arp8	byr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.315908524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773173	2543563	2539812	279979	276362	SPAC664.02c	SPBC1347.02	arp8	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.011585265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773174	2543563	2541337	279979	277848	SPAC664.02c	SPBP35G2.13c	arp8	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.299292111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773175	2543563	2542875	279979	279320	SPAC664.02c	SPAC13G7.02c	arp8	ssa1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639637075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773176	2543563	2539160	279979	275732	SPAC664.02c	SPCC18.17c	arp8	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.882403215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773177	2543563	2543391	279979	279813	SPAC664.02c	SPAC4G9.09c	arp8	arg11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.505707009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773178	2543563	2539499	279979	276062	SPAC664.02c	SPCC622.08c	arp8	hta1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.06019078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773179	2543563	2538762	279979	275345	SPAC664.02c	SPCC306.04c	arp8	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.532559603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773180	2543563	2539137	279979	275709	SPAC664.02c	SPCC1682.08c	arp8	mcp2	-	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440813337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773181	2543563	2543670	279979	280084	SPAC664.02c	SPAPB1E7.06c	arp8	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.934527927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773182	2543563	2540498	279979	277026	SPAC664.02c	SPBC27.02c	arp8	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.553860353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773183	2543563	2540800	279979	277319	SPAC664.02c	SPBC409.20c	arp8	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.351901024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773184	2543563	2543304	279979	279728	SPAC664.02c	SPAC6B12.12	arp8	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.037513609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773185	2543563	2538966	279979	275540	SPAC664.02c	SPCC18.10	arp8	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.077206712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773186	2543563	2539246	279979	275816	SPAC664.02c	SPCC18.13	arp8	SPCC18.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.347768634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773187	2543563	2538962	279979	275536	SPAC664.02c	SPCC965.13	arp8	SPCC965.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.090241463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773188	2543563	2539013	279979	275586	SPAC664.02c	SPCC364.03	arp8	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38733459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773189	2543563	2540699	279979	277223	SPAC664.02c	SPBC800.08	arp8	gcd10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571605592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773190	2543563	2542418	279979	278881	SPAC664.02c	SPAC1805.07c	arp8	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.061375882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773191	2543563	2543091	279979	279524	SPAC664.02c	SPAC12G12.15	arp8	sif3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.438230327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773192	2543563	2542826	279979	279273	SPAC664.02c	SPAC13G6.09	arp8	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451178537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773193	2543563	2539668	279979	276223	SPAC664.02c	SPBC11B10.10c	arp8	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.753536775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773194	2543563	2541404	279979	277913	SPAC664.02c	SPBPB2B2.18	arp8	SPBPB2B2.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575275608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773195	2543563	2542250	279979	278720	SPAC664.02c	SPAC17D4.03c	arp8	cis4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.409502063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773196	2543563	2543633	279979	280047	SPAC664.02c	SPAC3H8.05c	arp8	mms1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.689259389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773197	2543563	2540551	279979	277078	SPAC664.02c	SPBC23E6.01c	arp8	cxr1	-	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.891536814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773198	2543563	2543380	279979	279802	SPAC664.02c	SPAC4G9.16c	arp8	rpl901	-	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.558278857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773199	2543563	2540146	279979	276683	SPAC664.02c	SPBC17A3.06	arp8	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.141864281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773200	2543563	2539189	279979	275760	SPAC664.02c	SPCC1682.16	arp8	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.556296432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773201	2543563	2543337	279979	279760	SPAC664.02c	SPAC959.08	arp8	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.845973031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773202	2543563	2541238	279979	277752	SPAC664.02c	SPBC8E4.05c	arp8	SPBC8E4.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7801335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773203	2543563	2539700	279979	276253	SPAC664.02c	SPBC1685.15c	arp8	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.300411661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773204	2543563	2541806	279979	278297	SPAC664.02c	SPAC4G8.13c	arp8	prz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.291242865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773205	2543563	2543387	279979	279809	SPAC664.02c	SPAPB1E7.02c	arp8	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781623915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773206	2543563	2542424	279979	278886	SPAC664.02c	SPAC1805.14	arp8	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.557186121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773207	2543563	2541478	279979	277980	SPAC664.02c	SPAC2F7.17	arp8	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199722698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773208	2543563	2541080	279979	277595	SPAC664.02c	SPBC557.04	arp8	ppk29	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987512881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773209	2543563	2542440	279979	278902	SPAC664.02c	SPAC17A2.12	arp8	rrp1	-	SPAC17A2.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03483925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773210	2543563	2542943	279979	279384	SPAC664.02c	SPBC1348.03	arp8	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703851085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773211	2543563	2543472	279979	279892	SPAC664.02c	SPAC959.04c	arp8	omh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.711149012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773212	2543563	2540320	279979	276850	SPAC664.02c	SPBC3D6.04c	arp8	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509284916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773213	2543563	2540649	279979	277174	SPAC664.02c	SPBC19F8.08	arp8	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.812680399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773214	2540249	2542207	276781	278682	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC17H9.10c	duo1	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.427754067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773215	2540249	2539050	276781	275623	SPBC32F12.08c	SPCC11E10.08	duo1	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320529361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773216	2540249	2540060	276781	276598	SPBC32F12.08c	SPBC106.01	duo1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.138816106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773217	2540249	2541512	276781	278013	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC11E3.08c	duo1	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.74517079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773218	2540249	2542066	276781	278543	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC227.05	duo1	SPAC227.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.061701252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773219	2540249	2541426	276781	277931	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC227.06	duo1	SPAC227.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769431068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773220	2540249	2542358	276781	278823	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC1782.09c	duo1	clp1	-	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.537698597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773221	2540249	2542378	276781	278842	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC1805.04	duo1	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.059823608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773222	2540249	2543524	276781	279942	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC4D7.07c	duo1	csi2	-	SPAC4D7.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.332851479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773223	2540249	2542237	276781	278709	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC19E9.02	duo1	fin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.73778081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773224	2540249	2539930	276781	276474	SPBC32F12.08c	SPBC1198.11c	duo1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699594352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773225	2540249	3361561	276781	280637	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC11E3.01c	duo1	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.516828387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773226	2540249	2541853	276781	278344	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC2F3.11	duo1	SPAC2F3.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9856493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773227	2540249	2541856	276781	278347	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC23H3.08c	duo1	bub3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.185273423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773228	2540249	2541117	276781	277632	SPBC32F12.08c	SPBC646.13	duo1	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513488017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773229	2540249	2539309	276781	275876	SPBC32F12.08c	SPCC4G3.19	duo1	alp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.057389161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773230	2540249	2540664	276781	277189	SPBC32F12.08c	SPBC215.02	duo1	bob1	-	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.292577119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773231	2540249	3361436	276781	280512	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC1296.01c	duo1	SPAC1296.01c	-	SPAC22F3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.624544506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773232	2540249	2541200	276781	277714	SPBC32F12.08c	SPBC8D2.03c	duo1	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.370334102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773233	2540249	2542468	276781	278929	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC1D4.09c	duo1	rtf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.988114092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773234	2540249	2541208	276781	277722	SPBC32F12.08c	SPBC887.04c	duo1	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.838532212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773235	2540249	2538847	276781	275428	SPBC32F12.08c	SPCC594.06c	duo1	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.552108292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773236	2540249	2542848	276781	279294	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC9G1.03c	duo1	rpl3001	-	rpl30|rpl30-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331418312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773237	2540249	2539434	276781	275997	SPBC32F12.08c	SPCC757.09c	duo1	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.333011584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773238	2540249	2541026	276781	277541	SPBC32F12.08c	SPBC337.09	duo1	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.420131557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773239	2540249	2542012	276781	278495	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC23C11.02c	duo1	rps23	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64341032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773240	2540249	2540425	276781	276953	SPBC32F12.08c	SPBC27.06c	duo1	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.195809151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773241	2540249	2541424	276781	277929	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC23G3.04	duo1	ies4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.282266283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773242	2540249	2542318	276781	278784	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC16C9.05	duo1	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.7234071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773243	2540249	2542277	276781	278746	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC17A5.02c	duo1	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.42922727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773244	2540249	2541580	276781	278077	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC1687.05	duo1	pli1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.112752487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773245	2540249	2543108	276781	279540	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC3A12.13c	duo1	SPAC3A12.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.051617002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773246	2540249	2539244	276781	275814	SPBC32F12.08c	SPCC1672.06c	duo1	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.97739504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773247	2540249	2543563	276781	279979	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC664.02c	duo1	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.81545606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773248	2540249	2543584	276781	279999	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAPB1E7.11c	duo1	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578095114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773249	2540249	2543426	276781	279846	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC631.02	duo1	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.60849058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773250	2540249	2538906	276781	275483	SPBC32F12.08c	SPCC1259.03	duo1	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.650560707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773251	2540249	2540825	276781	277343	SPBC32F12.08c	SPBC428.08c	duo1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.267370676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773252	2540249	2542268	276781	278737	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC17A5.07c	duo1	ulp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.84340375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773253	2540249	2539467	276781	276030	SPBC32F12.08c	SPCC417.07c	duo1	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.81805267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773254	2540249	2543514	276781	279932	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC4D7.03	duo1	pop2	-	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.191144368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773255	2540249	2541885	276781	278375	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC22H10.03c	duo1	kap114	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.67940318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773256	2540249	2543445	276781	279865	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC4F10.13c	duo1	mpd2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.57626785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773257	2540249	2540338	276781	276867	SPBC32F12.08c	SPBC2G2.13c	duo1	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.418316389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773258	2540249	2542123	276781	278599	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC18G6.15	duo1	mal3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.26184309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773259	2540249	2538706	276781	275290	SPBC32F12.08c	SPCC338.08	duo1	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.270385871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773260	2540249	2540396	276781	276924	SPBC32F12.08c	SPBC31F10.12	duo1	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.776319112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773261	2540249	2538800	276781	275381	SPBC32F12.08c	SPCC1322.06	duo1	kap113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.556191022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773262	2540249	2539219	276781	275789	SPBC32F12.08c	SPCC1795.01c	duo1	mad3	-	SPCC895.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.496198396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773263	2540249	2539484	276781	276047	SPBC32F12.08c	SPCC594.04c	duo1	SPCC594.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.710934309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773264	2540249	2543667	276781	280081	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC4H3.02c	duo1	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.314923057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773265	2540249	2539689	276781	276244	SPBC32F12.08c	SPBC1861.03	duo1	mak10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.790085603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773266	2540249	2541532	276781	278032	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC2C4.15c	duo1	ubx2	-	ucp13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.460086723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773267	2540249	2543643	276781	280057	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC3G9.07c	duo1	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.113698227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773268	2540249	2541899	276781	278389	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC22E12.11c	duo1	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.759927668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773269	2540249	2541710	276781	278205	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC343.11c	duo1	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.502515284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773270	2540249	2539667	276781	276222	SPBC32F12.08c	SPBC13G1.08c	duo1	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.117816649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773271	2540249	2542126	276781	278602	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC1B3.05	duo1	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.199370418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773272	2540249	2542007	276781	278490	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC20H4.07	duo1	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.960965551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773273	2540249	2543244	276781	279672	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC6B12.06c	duo1	rrg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.553628913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773274	2540249	2542976	276781	279414	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC9E9.09c	duo1	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.161517306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773275	2540249	2541900	276781	278390	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC23H4.17c	duo1	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446791718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773276	2540249	2539408	276781	275973	SPBC32F12.08c	SPCC576.12c	duo1	mhf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.377699794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773277	2540249	2541009	276781	277524	SPBC32F12.08c	SPBC428.04	duo1	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.995234494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773278	2540249	2543443	276781	279863	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC3H1.12c	duo1	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.904378138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773279	2540249	2541536	276781	278036	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC1071.02	duo1	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387049071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773280	2540249	2541464	276781	277966	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC222.08c	duo1	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.741196016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773281	2540249	2543307	276781	279731	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC694.05c	duo1	rps2502	-	rps25|rps25-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.40386567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773282	2540249	2539847	276781	276395	SPBC32F12.08c	SPBC530.14c	duo1	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.69437486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773283	2540249	2540599	276781	277125	SPBC32F12.08c	SPBC29A3.10c	duo1	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.552856437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773284	2540249	3361470	276781	280546	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC3G9.01	duo1	nsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.305446406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773285	2540249	2543315	276781	279739	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC6B12.07c	duo1	SPAC6B12.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.312031598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773286	2540249	2541488	276781	277990	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC227.17c	duo1	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.999359047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773287	2540249	2541337	276781	277848	SPBC32F12.08c	SPBP35G2.13c	duo1	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.783743134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773288	2540249	2539527	276781	276089	SPBC32F12.08c	SPCC338.16	duo1	pof3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.396415971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773289	2540249	2543139	276781	279571	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC12G12.03	duo1	cip2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321808275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773290	2540249	3361520	276781	280596	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC1610.02c	duo1	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.878755768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773291	2540249	2542198	276781	278673	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC6F12.09	duo1	rdp1	-	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.315872923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773292	2540249	2539160	276781	275732	SPBC32F12.08c	SPCC18.17c	duo1	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.993933537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773293	2540249	2538762	276781	275345	SPBC32F12.08c	SPCC306.04c	duo1	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.760077716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773294	2540249	2543628	276781	280042	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC3H8.10	duo1	spo20	-	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.539160833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773295	2540249	2543106	276781	279538	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC3A11.13	duo1	SPAC3A11.13	-	SPAC3H5.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.371851882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773296	2540249	2541909	276781	278399	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC227.01c	duo1	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.87766593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773297	2540249	2543304	276781	279728	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC6B12.12	duo1	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.751912607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773298	2540249	2538966	276781	275540	SPBC32F12.08c	SPCC18.10	duo1	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.538000758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773299	2540249	2540960	276781	277476	SPBC32F12.08c	SPBC3D6.02	duo1	but2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577307302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773300	2540249	2541531	276781	278031	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC25A8.01c	duo1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.342852041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773301	2540249	2541678	276781	278174	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAP7G5.05	duo1	rpl1002	-	rpl10|rpl10-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.260897647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773302	2540249	2542418	276781	278881	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC1805.07c	duo1	dad2	-	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038883712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773303	2540249	2542826	276781	279273	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC13G6.09	duo1	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.322972038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773304	2540249	2539668	276781	276223	SPBC32F12.08c	SPBC11B10.10c	duo1	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.837142568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773305	2540249	2540516	276781	277044	SPBC32F12.08c	SPBC21C3.01c	duo1	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.308067727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773306	2540249	2543633	276781	280047	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC3H8.05c	duo1	mms1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.920763196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773307	2540249	2542904	276781	279348	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC144.11	duo1	rps1102	-	rps11|rps11-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.828260933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773308	2540249	2539189	276781	275760	SPBC32F12.08c	SPCC1682.16	duo1	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.96130016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773309	2540249	2542021	276781	278504	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAP14E8.02	duo1	tos4	-	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.937874043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773310	2540249	2542716	276781	279169	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC25H1.07	duo1	emc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.830393926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773311	2540249	2543384	276781	279806	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC637.06	duo1	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.50580404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773312	2540249	2543387	276781	279809	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAPB1E7.02c	duo1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.007152553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773313	2540249	2542424	276781	278886	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC1805.14	duo1	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.524595665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773314	2540249	2541478	276781	277980	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC2F7.17	duo1	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.762167769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773315	2540249	2542656	276781	279110	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC2E1P3.05c	duo1	SPAC2E1P3.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.618325239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773316	2540249	2541272	276781	277786	SPBC32F12.08c	SPBC947.03c	duo1	naa38	-	mak31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.131487172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773317	2540249	2541297	276781	277809	SPBC32F12.08c	SPBC9B6.07	duo1	nop52	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.122040546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773318	2540249	2542617	276781	279071	SPBC32F12.08c	SPAC13A11.01c	duo1	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.397226049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773319	2538701	2542577	275286	279033	SPCC1235.09	SPAC19G12.15c	hif2	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.129892988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773320	2538701	2543529	275286	279947	SPCC1235.09	SPAC4C5.02c	hif2	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.37791463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773321	2538701	2541512	275286	278013	SPCC1235.09	SPAC11E3.08c	hif2	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.911021149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773322	2538701	2539156	275286	275728	SPCC1235.09	SPCC1450.08c	hif2	wtf16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.187742785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773323	2538701	2539930	275286	276474	SPCC1235.09	SPBC1198.11c	hif2	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.830224269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773324	2538701	2540161	275286	276696	SPCC1235.09	SPBC13E7.03c	hif2	SPBC13E7.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.203476525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773325	2538701	2540347	275286	276876	SPCC1235.09	SPBC30B4.08	hif2	eri1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.266515216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773326	2538701	2540694	275286	277218	SPCC1235.09	SPBC19C7.10	hif2	bqt4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444168495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773327	2538701	2540686	275286	277211	SPCC1235.09	SPBC21D10.10	hif2	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51332271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773328	2538701	2538922	275286	275499	SPCC1235.09	SPCC16C4.10	hif2	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.11584066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773329	2538701	2539226	275286	275796	SPCC1235.09	SPCC16C4.20c	hif2	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.178681506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773330	2538701	2539564	275286	276125	SPCC1235.09	SPCC550.12	hif2	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.41802717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773331	2538701	2542689	275286	279142	SPCC1235.09	SPAC29B12.04	hif2	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.41923267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773332	2538701	2542277	275286	278746	SPCC1235.09	SPAC17A5.02c	hif2	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.807298274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773333	2538701	2543308	275286	279732	SPCC1235.09	SPAC694.04c	hif2	SPAC694.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.626554757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773334	2538701	2540595	275286	277121	SPCC1235.09	SPBC21C3.02c	hif2	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.559397762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773335	2538701	2539244	275286	275814	SPCC1235.09	SPCC1672.06c	hif2	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.745284511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773336	2538701	2543563	275286	279979	SPCC1235.09	SPAC664.02c	hif2	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.243100534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773337	2538701	2539352	275286	275918	SPCC1235.09	SPCC188.07	hif2	ccq1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.438436229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773338	2538701	2538972	275286	275546	SPCC1235.09	SPCC1739.15	hif2	wtf21	-	wtf3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381942304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773339	2538701	2542845	275286	279291	SPCC1235.09	SPAC824.04	hif2	SPAC824.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.880422474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773340	2538701	2540825	275286	277343	SPCC1235.09	SPBC428.08c	hif2	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.187405292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773341	2538701	2542665	275286	279118	SPCC1235.09	SPAC10F6.08c	hif2	nht10	-	nht1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507536973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773342	2538701	2542311	275286	278777	SPCC1235.09	SPAC16A10.05c	hif2	dad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702068495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773343	2538701	2540892	275286	277408	SPCC1235.09	SPBC530.01	hif2	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.928713047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773344	2538701	2538770	275286	275353	SPCC1235.09	SPCC1753.02c	hif2	git3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.762235053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773345	2538701	2540647	275286	277172	SPCC1235.09	SPBC18H10.07	hif2	SPBC18H10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.715773232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773346	2538701	2541038	275286	277553	SPCC1235.09	SPBC29A10.01	hif2	ccr1	-	SPBC365.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.629055638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773347	2538701	2542507	275286	278965	SPCC1235.09	SPAC18G6.13	hif2	SPAC18G6.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.507980965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773348	2538701	2539733	275286	276285	SPCC1235.09	SPBC16E9.12c	hif2	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.898413713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773349	2538701	2541496	275286	277998	SPCC1235.09	SPAC23D3.09	hif2	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.267086355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773350	2538701	2543667	275286	280081	SPCC1235.09	SPAC4H3.02c	hif2	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324114861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773351	2538701	2539689	275286	276244	SPCC1235.09	SPBC1861.03	hif2	mak10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.372114996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773352	2538701	2539284	275286	275852	SPCC1235.09	SPCC584.15c	hif2	SPCC584.15c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81460032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773353	2538701	2539667	275286	276222	SPCC1235.09	SPBC13G1.08c	hif2	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.448662086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773354	2538701	2540290	275286	276821	SPCC1235.09	SPBC29A3.02c	hif2	his7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508923205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773355	2538701	2539974	275286	276518	SPCC1235.09	SPBC32H8.07	hif2	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322482789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773356	2538701	2541720	275286	278214	SPCC1235.09	SPAC23H3.13c	hif2	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.945575925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773357	2538701	2542549	275286	279006	SPCC1235.09	SPAC19A8.11c	hif2	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.333095596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773358	2538701	2541009	275286	277524	SPCC1235.09	SPBC428.04	hif2	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.993068461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773359	2538701	2539953	275286	276497	SPCC1235.09	SPBC1709.11c	hif2	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.138208445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773360	2538701	2542439	275286	278901	SPCC1235.09	SPAC17A5.08	hif2	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.510475042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773361	2538701	2543443	275286	279863	SPCC1235.09	SPAC3H1.12c	hif2	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.333915989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773362	2538701	2541536	275286	278036	SPCC1235.09	SPAC1071.02	hif2	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.429420073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773363	2538701	2540342	275286	276871	SPCC1235.09	SPBC2G2.01c	hif2	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.974776347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773364	2538701	2540967	275286	277483	SPCC1235.09	SPBC36B7.08c	hif2	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994071939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773365	2538701	2542597	275286	279051	SPCC1235.09	SPAP8A3.07c	hif2	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.820414976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773366	2538701	2543254	275286	279682	SPCC1235.09	SPAC1006.03c	hif2	red1	-	iss3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.129023064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773367	2538701	2541017	275286	277532	SPCC1235.09	SPBC36.07	hif2	elp1	-	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.111543303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773368	2538701	2540821	275286	277339	SPCC1235.09	SPBC800.03	hif2	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.451830808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773369	2538701	2542806	275286	279254	SPCC1235.09	SPAC1610.01	hif2	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.920730494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773370	2538701	2542759	275286	279209	SPCC1235.09	SPAC9G1.07	hif2	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.848141971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773371	2538701	2539555	275286	276116	SPCC1235.09	SPCC4B3.08	hif2	lsg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323791054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773372	2538701	2541909	275286	278399	SPCC1235.09	SPAC227.01c	hif2	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.843492826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773373	2538701	2540498	275286	277026	SPCC1235.09	SPBC27.02c	hif2	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.889327834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773374	2538701	2543096	275286	279528	SPCC1235.09	SPAC977.05c	hif2	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.923844715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773375	2538701	2540531	275286	277059	SPCC1235.09	SPBC23E6.08	hif2	sat1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.538241509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773376	2538701	2541531	275286	278031	SPCC1235.09	SPAC25A8.01c	hif2	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.694004071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773377	2538701	2542418	275286	278881	SPCC1235.09	SPAC1805.07c	hif2	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.710635351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773378	2538701	2542826	275286	279273	SPCC1235.09	SPAC13G6.09	hif2	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.997932915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773379	2538701	2539668	275286	276223	SPCC1235.09	SPBC11B10.10c	hif2	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.527150382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773380	2538701	2541789	275286	278281	SPCC1235.09	SPAC23H4.08	hif2	iwr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.337997849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773381	2538701	2539928	275286	276472	SPCC1235.09	SPBC1604.08c	hif2	imp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.406635643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773382	2538701	2543387	275286	279809	SPCC1235.09	SPAPB1E7.02c	hif2	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.816974718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773383	2538701	2540938	275286	277454	SPCC1235.09	SPBC365.14c	hif2	uge1	-	gal10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389074424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773384	2538701	2541062	275286	277577	SPCC1235.09	SPBC660.11	hif2	tcg1	-	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.447460714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773385	2539142	2539147	275714	275719	SPCC1827.08c	SPCC622.12c	pof7	gdh1	SPCC70.11c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321477403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773386	2539142	2541552	275714	278051	SPCC1827.08c	SPAC1142.08	pof7	fhl1	SPCC70.11c	SPAC8C9.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.127423255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773387	2539142	2539944	275714	276488	SPCC1827.08c	SPBC1198.06c	pof7	SPBC1198.06c	SPCC70.11c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101357409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773388	2539142	2542758	275714	279208	SPCC1827.08c	SPAC15E1.02c	pof7	SPAC15E1.02c	SPCC70.11c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866614324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773389	2539142	2539263	275714	275833	SPCC1827.08c	SPCC895.09c	pof7	ucp12	SPCC70.11c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321668347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773390	2539142	2542141	275714	278617	SPCC1827.08c	SPAC17C9.05c	pof7	pmc3	SPCC70.11c	med27|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199775481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773391	2539142	2539961	275714	276505	SPCC1827.08c	SPBC1198.09	pof7	ubc16	SPCC70.11c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.15482762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773392	2539142	2541522	275714	278023	SPCC1827.08c	SPAC23E2.01	pof7	fep1	SPCC70.11c	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.90707597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773393	2539142	2542791	275714	279240	SPCC1827.08c	SPAC167.04	pof7	pam17	SPCC70.11c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.446306542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773394	2539142	2540326	275714	276856	SPCC1827.08c	SPBC2G5.06c	pof7	hmt2	SPCC70.11c	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392636442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773395	2539142	2542861	275714	279307	SPCC1827.08c	SPAC13G7.13c	pof7	msa1	SPCC70.11c	SPAC6C3.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570034201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773396	2539142	2539000	275714	275574	SPCC1827.08c	SPCC1450.06c	pof7	grx3	SPCC70.11c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444826008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773397	2539142	5802861	275714	857999	SPCC1827.08c	SPAC1D4.01	pof7	tls1	SPCC70.11c	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039401322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773398	2539142	2542773	275714	279222	SPCC1827.08c	SPAC16.01	pof7	rho2	SPCC70.11c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982798187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773399	2539142	2538848	275714	275429	SPCC1827.08c	SPCC613.12c	pof7	raf1	SPCC70.11c	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449550145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773400	2539142	2543219	275714	279647	SPCC1827.08c	SPAC56F8.09	pof7	rrp8	SPCC70.11c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815509159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773401	2539142	2543602	275714	280017	SPCC1827.08c	SPAPB1A11.04c	pof7	mca1	SPCC70.11c	SPAPB1A11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.914725397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773402	2539142	2541238	275714	277752	SPCC1827.08c	SPBC8E4.05c	pof7	SPBC8E4.05c	SPCC70.11c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.497643512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773403	2541979	2540491	278464	277019	SPAC23A1.07	SPBC28E12.04	SPAC23A1.07	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.083007141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773404	2541979	2541761	278464	278255	SPAC23A1.07	SPAC7D4.12c	SPAC23A1.07	SPAC7D4.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.691221217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773405	2541979	2542318	278464	278784	SPAC23A1.07	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC23A1.07	cph1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922823075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773406	2541979	2539381	278464	275947	SPAC23A1.07	SPCC1739.10	SPAC23A1.07	mug33	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990396487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773407	2541979	2541160	278464	277675	SPAC23A1.07	SPBC725.09c	SPAC23A1.07	hob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.498955477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773408	2541979	2539293	278464	275861	SPAC23A1.07	SPCC553.08c	SPAC23A1.07	ria1	-	SPCC553.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.395542653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773409	2541979	2541628	278464	278124	SPAC23A1.07	SPAC110.02	SPAC23A1.07	pds5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868431369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773410	2541979	2541909	278464	278399	SPAC23A1.07	SPAC227.01c	SPAC23A1.07	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704245489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773411	2541979	2540325	278464	276855	SPAC23A1.07	SPBC21B10.10	SPAC23A1.07	rps402	-	rps4-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985321532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773412	2541979	2541357	278464	277868	SPAC23A1.07	SPBPB7E8.01	SPAC23A1.07	SPBPB7E8.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575621638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773413	2541979	2540320	278464	276850	SPAC23A1.07	SPBC3D6.04c	SPAC23A1.07	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05446945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773414	2543310	2542969	279734	279409	SPAC6B12.11	SPAC4G8.10	drc1	gos1	sld2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.193851679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773415	2543310	2543641	279734	280055	SPAC6B12.11	SPAC3H5.08c	drc1	SPAC3H5.08c	sld2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.445726458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773416	2543310	2540836	279734	277354	SPAC6B12.11	SPBC18H10.19	drc1	vps38	sld2	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.981943923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773417	2539080	2539549	275652	276110	SPCC1235.06	SPCC576.01c	sif1	xan1	-	SPCC576.01c|SPCPB1C11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319563365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773418	2539080	2542080	275652	278557	SPCC1235.06	SPAC27D7.03c	sif1	mei2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.200449403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773419	2539080	2542585	275652	279040	SPCC1235.06	SPAC31A2.13c	sif1	sft1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.030780009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773420	2539080	2541343	275652	277854	SPCC1235.06	SPBPB2B2.19c	sif1	SPBPB2B2.19c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.198530351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773421	2539080	2541426	275652	277931	SPCC1235.06	SPAC227.06	sif1	SPAC227.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872915068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773422	2539080	2541818	275652	278309	SPCC1235.06	SPAC11G7.02	sif1	pub1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.191501707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773423	2539080	2542965	275652	279405	SPCC1235.06	SPAC3G6.04	sif1	rnp24	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.071817589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773424	2539080	2540524	275652	277052	SPCC1235.06	SPBC21B10.08c	sif1	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.902745647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773425	2539080	2539951	275652	276495	SPCC1235.06	SPBC11B10.05c	sif1	rsp1	-	pi006|SPACTOKYO_453.30c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.520094864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773426	2539080	2541051	275652	277566	SPCC1235.06	SPBC3E7.08c	sif1	rad13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810484798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773427	2539080	2542747	275652	279197	SPCC1235.06	SPAC15A10.06	sif1	SPAC15A10.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.578404486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773428	2539080	2543201	275652	279630	SPCC1235.06	SPAC3F10.15c	sif1	spo12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.320479806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773429	2539080	2539196	275652	275767	SPCC1235.06	SPCC1795.03	sif1	gms1	-	gmn3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.208191833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773430	2539080	2540347	275652	276876	SPCC1235.06	SPBC30B4.08	sif1	eri1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982762057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773431	2539080	2543164	275652	279595	SPCC1235.06	SPAC3G6.06c	sif1	rad2	-	fen1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875863724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773432	2539080	2543434	275652	279854	SPCC1235.06	SPAC8F11.02c	sif1	dph3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.394996674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773433	2539080	2539800	275652	276350	SPCC1235.06	SPBC1347.13c	sif1	mrm1	-	SPBC1347.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384732411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773434	2539080	2543680	275652	280094	SPCC1235.06	SPAC4G9.20c	sif1	SPAC4G9.20c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813769582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773435	2539080	2542701	275652	279154	SPCC1235.06	SPAC26H5.05	sif1	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.460457042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773436	2539080	2542103	275652	278579	SPCC1235.06	SPAC31G5.11	sif1	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.825002645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773437	2539080	2539208	275652	275778	SPCC1235.06	SPCC1450.11c	sif1	cek1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.265753118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773438	2539080	2541200	275652	277714	SPCC1235.06	SPBC8D2.03c	sif1	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.062604425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773439	2539080	2542107	275652	278583	SPCC1235.06	SPAC30.01c	sif1	sec72	-	sec7b|sec702	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.976265506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773440	2539080	2541408	275652	277916	SPCC1235.06	SPBPB2B2.14c	sif1	SPBPB2B2.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321974271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773441	2539080	2541208	275652	277722	SPCC1235.06	SPBC887.04c	sif1	lub1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.91894172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773442	2539080	2541313	275652	277825	SPCC1235.06	SPBP26C9.02c	sif1	car1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.839220174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773443	2539080	2543145	275652	279577	SPCC1235.06	SPAC4F8.15	sif1	itr1	-	SPAC7D4.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.502781191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773444	2539080	2538801	275652	275382	SPCC1235.06	SPCC285.13c	sif1	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.928119132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773445	2539080	2542689	275652	279142	SPCC1235.06	SPAC29B12.04	sif1	snz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.210753166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773446	2539080	2542848	275652	279294	SPCC1235.06	SPAC9G1.03c	sif1	rpl3001	-	rpl30|rpl30-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.658950392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773447	2539080	2540160	275652	276695	SPCC1235.06	SPBC1773.17c	sif1	SPBC1773.17c	-	SPBP26C9.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.49656648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773448	2539080	2543636	275652	280050	SPCC1235.06	SPAC3H8.08c	sif1	SPAC3H8.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03876202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773449	2539080	2540463	275652	276991	SPCC1235.06	SPBC2F12.15c	sif1	pfa3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.824012821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773450	2539080	2538716	275652	275300	SPCC1235.06	SPCC13B11.02c	sif1	SPCC13B11.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.975340653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773451	2539080	2541527	275652	278027	SPCC1235.06	SPAC31A2.09c	sif1	apm4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1978084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773452	2539080	2542969	275652	279409	SPCC1235.06	SPAC4G8.10	sif1	gos1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.556783972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773453	2539080	2541436	275652	277941	SPCC1235.06	SPAC11H11.03c	sif1	SPAC11H11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.203182323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773454	2539080	2543308	275652	279732	SPCC1235.06	SPAC694.04c	sif1	SPAC694.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.759221506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773455	2539080	2539648	275652	276203	SPCC1235.06	SPBC1198.08	sif1	SPBC1198.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.92729085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773456	2539080	2542082	275652	278559	SPCC1235.06	SPAC29B12.10c	sif1	pgt1	-	opt1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.738978689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773457	2539080	2540023	275652	276567	SPCC1235.06	SPBC11C11.10	sif1	SPBC11C11.10	-	SPBC3B8.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.32170398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773458	2539080	2539457	275652	276020	SPCC1235.06	SPCC550.09	sif1	SPCC550.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.50488075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773459	2539080	2540825	275652	277343	SPCC1235.06	SPBC428.08c	sif1	clr4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873235717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773460	2539080	3361543	275652	280619	SPCC1235.06	SPAC9.13c	sif1	cwf16	-	SPAPJ735.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.827936706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773461	2539080	2541021	275652	277536	SPCC1235.06	SPBC3B8.10c	sif1	nem1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.283146908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773462	2539080	2540893	275652	277409	SPCC1235.06	SPBC543.10	sif1	get1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.078510768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773463	2539080	2541335	275652	277846	SPCC1235.06	SPBP4G3.03	sif1	SPBP4G3.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.758420128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773464	2539080	2539051	275652	275624	SPCC1235.06	SPCC1183.11	sif1	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.496154214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773465	2539080	2539705	275652	276258	SPCC1235.06	SPBC1105.10	sif1	rav1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.686019773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773466	2539080	2542177	275652	278652	SPCC1235.06	SPAC17H9.08	sif1	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.038142114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773467	2539080	2540797	275652	277316	SPCC1235.06	SPBC18H10.11c	sif1	ppr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.207577904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773468	2539080	2540892	275652	277408	SPCC1235.06	SPBC530.01	sif1	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.372860724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773469	2539080	2541776	275652	278270	SPCC1235.06	SPAC23H3.05c	sif1	swd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930111066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773470	2539080	2539473	275652	276036	SPCC1235.06	SPCP25A2.02c	sif1	rhp26	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868161967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773471	2539080	2543272	275652	279700	SPCC1235.06	SPAC1002.07c	sif1	ats1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.847935172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773472	2539080	2543412	275652	279834	SPCC1235.06	SPAC637.07	sif1	moe1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.672084878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773473	2539080	2541735	275652	278229	SPCC1235.06	SPAC7D4.04	sif1	atg11	-	taf1|cvt9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.67547655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773474	2539080	2540363	275652	276892	SPCC1235.06	SPBC2F12.09c	sif1	atf21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.193565164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773475	2539080	2541658	275652	278154	SPCC1235.06	SPAC25B8.09	sif1	SPAC25B8.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.650322098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773476	2539080	2542297	275652	278764	SPCC1235.06	SPAC17H9.06c	sif1	SPAC17H9.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.375776298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773477	2539080	2542989	275652	279427	SPCC1235.06	SPAC11E3.13c	sif1	gas5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.694146647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773478	2539080	2542817	275652	279264	SPCC1235.06	SPAC13G6.02c	sif1	rps101	-	rps1-1|rps3a-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987780271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773479	2539080	2543283	275652	279709	SPCC1235.06	SPAC6C3.04	sif1	cit1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.970831896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773480	2539080	2542235	275652	278707	SPCC1235.06	SPAC18G6.05c	sif1	SPAC18G6.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.028688928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773481	2539080	2542921	275652	279362	SPCC1235.06	SPAC1093.01	sif1	ppr5	-	SPAC12B10.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.544998774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773482	2539080	2539454	275652	276017	SPCC1235.06	SPCC622.15c	sif1	SPCC622.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451995855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773483	2539080	2539603	275652	276161	SPCC1235.06	SPBC1289.06c	sif1	ppr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.925038863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773484	2539080	2541352	275652	277863	SPCC1235.06	SPBPJ4664.03	sif1	mfm3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.854496929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773485	2539080	2539111	275652	275683	SPCC1235.06	SPCC417.11c	sif1	SPCC417.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.615370723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773486	2539080	2543406	275652	279828	SPCC1235.06	SPAC9.12c	sif1	atp12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.88219349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773487	2539080	2539995	275652	276539	SPCC1235.06	SPBC1105.09	sif1	ubc15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.652505745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773488	2539080	2541401	275652	277910	SPCC1235.06	SPBPB10D8.05c	sif1	SPBPB10D8.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101726132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773489	2539080	2542861	275652	279307	SPCC1235.06	SPAC13G7.13c	sif1	msa1	-	SPAC6C3.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.559091877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773490	2539080	3361269	275652	280345	SPCC1235.06	SPBC31A8.01c	sif1	rtn1	-	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.203245634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773491	2539080	2540194	275652	276727	SPCC1235.06	SPBC1709.09	sif1	rrf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.255334327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773492	2539080	2542419	275652	278882	SPCC1235.06	SPAC17G6.05c	sif1	bro1	-	SPAC17G6.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.016579889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773493	2539080	2541720	275652	278214	SPCC1235.06	SPAC23H3.13c	sif1	gpa2	-	git8	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.100164234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773494	2539080	2541882	275652	278372	SPCC1235.06	SPAC2F7.09c	sif1	SPAC2F7.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927287687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773495	2539080	2540232	275652	276764	SPCC1235.06	SPBC336.10c	sif1	tif512	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.916712021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773496	2539080	2542254	275652	278724	SPCC1235.06	SPAC30D11.04c	sif1	nup124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.838013481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773497	2539080	2543522	275652	279940	SPCC1235.06	SPAPB24D3.08c	sif1	SPAPB24D3.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317369107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773498	2539080	2539027	275652	275600	SPCC1235.06	SPCC1322.08	sif1	srk1	-	mkp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.260904577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773499	2539080	2542439	275652	278901	SPCC1235.06	SPAC17A5.08	sif1	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.939577891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773500	2539080	2541389	275652	277900	SPCC1235.06	SPBPB2B2.09c	sif1	SPBPB2B2.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384712181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773501	2539080	2541536	275652	278036	SPCC1235.06	SPAC1071.02	sif1	mms19	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.105522104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773502	2539080	2541464	275652	277966	SPCC1235.06	SPAC222.08c	sif1	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035146671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773503	2539080	2538884	275652	275462	SPCC1235.06	SPCC1393.08	sif1	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.686411591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773504	2539080	2542829	275652	279276	SPCC1235.06	SPAC13D6.02c	sif1	byr3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.104564347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773505	2539080	2540193	275652	276726	SPCC1235.06	SPBC1289.10c	sif1	adn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.492121081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773506	2539080	2540926	275652	277442	SPCC1235.06	SPBC359.06	sif1	mug14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.690723905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773507	2539080	2540930	275652	277446	SPCC1235.06	SPBC354.10	sif1	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.500856073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773508	2539080	2542602	275652	279056	SPCC1235.06	SPAC186.09	sif1	SPAC186.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.334277455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773509	2539080	3361520	275652	280596	SPCC1235.06	SPAC1610.02c	sif1	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.464700207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773510	2539080	2540001	275652	276545	SPCC1235.06	SPBC1289.13c	sif1	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.372601194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773511	2539080	2539706	275652	276259	SPCC1235.06	SPBC16G5.13	sif1	ptf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331767443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773512	2539080	2542283	275652	278751	SPCC1235.06	SPAC27F1.08	sif1	pdt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.368510031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773513	2539080	2540442	275652	276970	SPCC1235.06	SPBC25B2.04c	sif1	mtg1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.822997246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773514	2539080	2539499	275652	276062	SPCC1235.06	SPCC622.08c	sif1	hta1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.954241704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773515	2539080	2539809	275652	276359	SPCC1235.06	SPBC16E9.02c	sif1	SPBC16E9.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387704176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773516	2539080	2542286	275652	278754	SPCC1235.06	SPAC1786.01c	sif1	ptl2	-	SPAC1786.01c|SPAC31G5.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844865684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773517	2539080	2539157	275652	275729	SPCC1235.06	SPCC1919.12c	sif1	SPCC1919.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.786172836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773518	2539080	2540849	275652	277366	SPCC1235.06	SPBC428.11	sif1	met17	-	SPBC428.11|cys2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.787398369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773519	2539080	2542847	275652	279293	SPCC1235.06	SPAC1420.01c	sif1	SPAC1420.01c	-	SPAC56E4.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980478723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773520	2539080	2542883	275652	279328	SPCC1235.06	SPAC1486.04c	sif1	alm1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987555002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773521	2539080	2540960	275652	277476	SPCC1235.06	SPBC3D6.02	sif1	but2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.055098262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773522	2539080	2543130	275652	279562	SPCC1235.06	SPAC869.05c	sif1	SPAC869.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.90659888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773523	2539080	2540725	275652	277248	SPCC1235.06	SPBC215.14c	sif1	vps20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.605716047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773524	2539080	2540000	275652	276544	SPCC1235.06	SPBC1683.13c	sif1	cha4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641925339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773525	2539080	2539136	275652	275708	SPCC1235.06	SPCC1919.05	sif1	SPCC1919.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382377556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773526	2539080	2538692	275652	275277	SPCC1235.06	SPCC162.04c	sif1	wtf13	-	wtf12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.940977011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773527	2539080	2539514	275652	276076	SPCC1235.06	SPCC663.14c	sif1	trp663	-	SPCC663.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.032557504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773528	2539080	2539668	275652	276223	SPCC1235.06	SPBC11B10.10c	sif1	pht1	-	pi001	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.406120245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773529	2539080	2541404	275652	277913	SPCC1235.06	SPBPB2B2.18	sif1	SPBPB2B2.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.432512529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773530	2539080	2542628	275652	279082	SPCC1235.06	SPAC24H6.06	sif1	sld3	-	mug175	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387256601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773531	2539080	2543109	275652	279541	SPCC1235.06	SPAC3G6.09c	sif1	tps2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510980892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773532	2539080	2543582	275652	279997	SPCC1235.06	SPAC4H3.06	sif1	SPAC4H3.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.419694053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773533	2539080	2541637	275652	278133	SPCC1235.06	SPAC57A10.04	sif1	mug10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708458588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773534	2539080	2542353	275652	278818	SPCC1235.06	SPAC57A10.07	sif1	SPAC57A10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.808787592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773535	2539080	2540489	275652	277017	SPCC1235.06	SPBC25H2.03	sif1	SPBC25H2.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.193655754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773536	2539080	2539205	275652	275775	SPCC1235.06	SPCC4B3.15	sif1	mid1	-	dmf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.557073839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773537	2539080	2540278	275652	276809	SPCC1235.06	SPBC1A4.04	sif1	SPBC1A4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.429552644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773538	2539080	2539920	275652	276464	SPCC1235.06	SPBC119.08	sif1	pmk1	-	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.057102734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773539	2539080	2541238	275652	277752	SPCC1235.06	SPBC8E4.05c	sif1	SPBC8E4.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.935180994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773540	2539080	2541129	275652	277644	SPCC1235.06	SPBC713.11c	sif1	pmp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.081636093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773541	2539080	2540409	275652	276937	SPCC1235.06	SPBC2D10.11c	sif1	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.701764955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773542	2539080	2540125	275652	276662	SPCC1235.06	SPBC16C6.01c	sif1	SPBC16C6.01c	-	SPBC543.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820558741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773543	2539080	2543372	275652	279794	SPCC1235.06	SPAPB1A10.09	sif1	ase1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.920295108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773544	2539080	2538834	275652	275415	SPCC1235.06	SPCC126.08c	sif1	SPCC126.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.567499591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773545	2539080	2542111	275652	278587	SPCC1235.06	SPAC1687.14c	sif1	SPAC1687.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.507433709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773546	2539080	2542656	275652	279110	SPCC1235.06	SPAC2E1P3.05c	sif1	SPAC2E1P3.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.883944904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773547	2538966	2540060	275540	276598	SPCC18.10	SPBC106.01	SPCC18.10	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439639325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773548	2538966	2539940	275540	276484	SPCC18.10	SPBC16A3.10	SPCC18.10	SPBC16A3.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871831407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773549	2538966	2539930	275540	276474	SPCC18.10	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC18.10	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.175487266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773550	2538966	3361561	275540	280637	SPCC18.10	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC18.10	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.177146247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773551	2538966	2540347	275540	276876	SPCC18.10	SPBC30B4.08	SPCC18.10	eri1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.685795705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773552	2538966	2542468	275540	278929	SPCC18.10	SPAC1D4.09c	SPCC18.10	rtf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.566856557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773553	2538966	2542677	275540	279130	SPCC18.10	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC18.10	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.520776823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773554	2538966	2539564	275540	276125	SPCC18.10	SPCC550.12	SPCC18.10	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390577864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773555	2538966	2539434	275540	275997	SPCC18.10	SPCC757.09c	SPCC18.10	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.054972166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773556	2538966	2542277	275540	278746	SPCC18.10	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC18.10	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.173895628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773557	2538966	2543308	275540	279732	SPCC18.10	SPAC694.04c	SPCC18.10	SPAC694.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.184930768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773558	2538966	2540595	275540	277121	SPCC18.10	SPBC21C3.02c	SPCC18.10	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.261106931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773559	2538966	2543326	275540	279749	SPCC18.10	SPAC56F8.12	SPCC18.10	SPAC56F8.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700873636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773560	2538966	2543563	275540	279979	SPCC18.10	SPAC664.02c	SPCC18.10	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.077206712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773561	2538966	2543426	275540	279846	SPCC18.10	SPAC631.02	SPCC18.10	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.56907376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773562	2538966	2543319	275540	279743	SPCC18.10	SPAC6B12.09	SPCC18.10	trm10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.517982273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773563	2538966	2542845	275540	279291	SPCC18.10	SPAC824.04	SPCC18.10	SPAC824.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.653249506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773564	2538966	2541021	275540	277536	SPCC18.10	SPBC3B8.10c	SPCC18.10	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449559212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773565	2538966	2540892	275540	277408	SPCC18.10	SPBC530.01	SPCC18.10	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320524613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773566	2538966	2542513	275540	278971	SPCC18.10	SPAC1952.05	SPCC18.10	gcn5	-	kat2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.81712494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773567	2538966	2542507	275540	278965	SPCC18.10	SPAC18G6.13	SPCC18.10	SPAC18G6.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.503531669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773568	2538966	2539733	275540	276285	SPCC18.10	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC18.10	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.06889258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773569	2538966	2541496	275540	277998	SPCC18.10	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC18.10	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.939661192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773570	2538966	2543667	275540	280081	SPCC18.10	SPAC4H3.02c	SPCC18.10	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.935331974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773571	2538966	2543643	275540	280057	SPCC18.10	SPAC3G9.07c	SPCC18.10	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.864813394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773572	2538966	2541899	275540	278389	SPCC18.10	SPAC22E12.11c	SPCC18.10	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.450422651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773573	2538966	2539293	275540	275861	SPCC18.10	SPCC553.08c	SPCC18.10	ria1	-	SPCC553.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442430091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773574	2538966	2541710	275540	278205	SPCC18.10	SPAC343.11c	SPCC18.10	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641571455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773575	2538966	2540327	275540	276857	SPCC18.10	SPBC31F10.07	SPCC18.10	lsb5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.125786691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773576	2538966	2539953	275540	276497	SPCC18.10	SPBC1709.11c	SPCC18.10	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.281967027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773577	2538966	2543443	275540	279863	SPCC18.10	SPAC3H1.12c	SPCC18.10	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.072130651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773578	2538966	2541464	275540	277966	SPCC18.10	SPAC222.08c	SPCC18.10	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.766863341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773579	2538966	2540967	275540	277483	SPCC18.10	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC18.10	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.289431793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773580	2538966	2538690	275540	275275	SPCC18.10	SPCC1393.05	SPCC18.10	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.594158353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773581	2538966	2540229	275540	276761	SPCC18.10	SPBC31F10.15c	SPCC18.10	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392546158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773582	2538966	2543254	275540	279682	SPCC18.10	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC18.10	red1	-	iss3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.694587377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773583	2538966	2542806	275540	279254	SPCC18.10	SPAC1610.01	SPCC18.10	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.27126551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773584	2538966	2539555	275540	276116	SPCC18.10	SPCC4B3.08	SPCC18.10	lsg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452726743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773585	2538966	2543106	275540	279538	SPCC18.10	SPAC3A11.13	SPCC18.10	SPAC3A11.13	-	SPAC3H5.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.842220463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773586	2538966	2540498	275540	277026	SPCC18.10	SPBC27.02c	SPCC18.10	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.620012708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773587	2538966	2540531	275540	277059	SPCC18.10	SPBC23E6.08	SPCC18.10	sat1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.806739549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773588	2538966	2541531	275540	278031	SPCC18.10	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC18.10	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.402875631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773589	2538966	2542418	275540	278881	SPCC18.10	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC18.10	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.922313547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773590	2538966	2542826	275540	279273	SPCC18.10	SPAC13G6.09	SPCC18.10	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.444143391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773591	2538966	2539668	275540	276223	SPCC18.10	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC18.10	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.212196068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773592	2538966	2540936	275540	277452	SPCC18.10	SPBC800.05c	SPCC18.10	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783701017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773593	2538966	2542059	275540	278537	SPCC18.10	SPAC328.06	SPCC18.10	ubp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.351851866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773594	2538966	2543372	275540	279794	SPCC18.10	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC18.10	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.777370428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773595	2538966	2542656	275540	279110	SPCC18.10	SPAC2E1P3.05c	SPCC18.10	SPAC2E1P3.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.058919834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773596	2538966	2540787	275540	277306	SPCC18.10	SPBC1921.07c	SPCC18.10	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.299620751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773597	2538966	2542879	275540	279324	SPCC18.10	SPAC13G7.07	SPCC18.10	arb2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392566993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773598	2538966	2542208	275540	278683	SPCC18.10	SPAC17G8.08c	SPCC18.10	SPAC17G8.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205480258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773599	2541538	2541343	278038	277854	SPAC24B11.08c	SPBPB2B2.19c	SPAC24B11.08c	SPBPB2B2.19c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570274716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773600	2541538	2541408	278038	277916	SPAC24B11.08c	SPBPB2B2.14c	SPAC24B11.08c	SPBPB2B2.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.708594974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773601	2541538	2538847	278038	275428	SPAC24B11.08c	SPCC594.06c	SPAC24B11.08c	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.915029204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773602	2541538	2539293	278038	275861	SPAC24B11.08c	SPCC553.08c	SPAC24B11.08c	ria1	-	SPCC553.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.901163481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773603	2541538	2539815	278038	276365	SPAC24B11.08c	SPBC1105.02c	SPAC24B11.08c	lys4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867384496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773604	2541538	2541404	278038	277913	SPAC24B11.08c	SPBPB2B2.18	SPAC24B11.08c	SPBPB2B2.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.261963689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773605	2541538	2543090	278038	279523	SPAC24B11.08c	SPBC1348.01	SPAC24B11.08c	SPBC1348.01	-	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450001456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773606	2541538	2540787	278038	277306	SPAC24B11.08c	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC24B11.08c	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9904381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773607	2541336	2540131	277847	276668	SPBP35G2.10	SPBC1778.05c	mit1	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329752053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773608	2541336	2541488	277847	277990	SPBP35G2.10	SPAC227.17c	mit1	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.868058848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773609	2541336	2543387	277847	279809	SPBP35G2.10	SPAPB1E7.02c	mit1	mcl1	-	slr3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81058416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773610	2539246	2540060	275816	276598	SPCC18.13	SPBC106.01	SPCC18.13	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.671886493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773611	2539246	2542293	275816	278761	SPCC18.13	SPAC17G8.14c	SPCC18.13	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.939379176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773612	2539246	2539035	275816	275608	SPCC18.13	SPCC794.09c	SPCC18.13	tef101	-	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.534818845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773613	2539246	2540491	275816	277019	SPCC18.13	SPBC28E12.04	SPCC18.13	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.204256438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773614	2539246	2542273	275816	278742	SPCC18.13	SPAC17H9.13c	SPCC18.13	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.255387199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773615	2539246	2541026	275816	277541	SPCC18.13	SPBC337.09	SPCC18.13	erg28	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.264270576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773616	2539246	2540467	275816	276995	SPCC18.13	SPBC2G2.07c	SPCC18.13	mug178	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783190048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773617	2539246	2541311	275816	277823	SPCC18.13	SPBP8B7.09c	SPCC18.13	los1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.895549346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773618	2539246	2543641	275816	280055	SPCC18.13	SPAC3H5.08c	SPCC18.13	SPAC3H5.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.559569062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773619	2539246	2543563	275816	279979	SPCC18.13	SPAC664.02c	SPCC18.13	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.347768634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773620	2539246	2542373	275816	278837	SPCC18.13	SPAC1805.06c	SPCC18.13	hem2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.123021339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773621	2539246	2540023	275816	276567	SPCC18.13	SPBC11C11.10	SPCC18.13	SPBC11C11.10	-	SPBC3B8.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.706008443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773622	2539246	2543319	275816	279743	SPCC18.13	SPAC6B12.09	SPCC18.13	trm10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.57895297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773623	2539246	2542253	275816	278723	SPCC18.13	SPAC17H9.04c	SPCC18.13	SPAC17H9.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637647871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773624	2539246	2542981	275816	279419	SPCC18.13	SPAC824.02	SPCC18.13	bst1	-	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446062565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773625	2539246	2539574	275816	276134	SPCC18.13	SPCPB16A4.04c	SPCC18.13	trm8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874687039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773626	2539246	2542568	275816	279024	SPCC18.13	SPAC1952.02	SPCC18.13	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.896294833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773627	2539246	2541776	275816	278270	SPCC18.13	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC18.13	swd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810947326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773628	2539246	2543412	275816	279834	SPCC18.13	SPAC637.07	SPCC18.13	moe1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932929992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773629	2539246	2541496	275816	277998	SPCC18.13	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC18.13	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994730438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773630	2539246	2539293	275816	275861	SPCC18.13	SPCC553.08c	SPCC18.13	ria1	-	SPCC553.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.499169093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773631	2539246	2543406	275816	279828	SPCC18.13	SPAC9.12c	SPCC18.13	atp12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046976334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773632	2539246	2539667	275816	276222	SPCC18.13	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC18.13	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.406636228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773633	2539246	2542126	275816	278602	SPCC18.13	SPAC1B3.05	SPCC18.13	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.055820591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773634	2539246	2540200	275816	276733	SPCC18.13	SPBC1709.06	SPCC18.13	dus2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.871060724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773635	2539246	2543236	275816	279664	SPCC18.13	SPAC8C9.04	SPCC18.13	SPAC8C9.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.611754437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773636	2539246	2541903	275816	278393	SPCC18.13	SPAC22F8.05	SPCC18.13	SPAC22F8.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.331006415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773637	2539246	3361403	275816	280479	SPCC18.13	SPAC27D7.12c	SPCC18.13	but1	-	SPAC27D7.12|mug107|prx	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51119047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773638	2539246	2541283	275816	277796	SPCC18.13	SPBP8B7.02	SPCC18.13	rng9	-	SPBP8B7.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87758422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773639	2539246	2539812	275816	276362	SPCC18.13	SPBC1347.02	SPCC18.13	fkbp39	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.929489141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773640	2539246	2541742	275816	278236	SPCC18.13	SPAC22H10.09	SPCC18.13	SPAC22H10.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.935067083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773641	2539246	2540910	275816	277426	SPCC18.13	SPBC577.02	SPCC18.13	rpl3801	-	rpl38-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095169121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773642	2539246	2543619	275816	280033	SPCC18.13	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC18.13	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.848491575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773643	2539246	2540800	275816	277319	SPCC18.13	SPBC409.20c	SPCC18.13	psh3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924716995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773644	2539246	2541531	275816	278031	SPCC18.13	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC18.13	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.30198129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773645	2539246	2541470	275816	277972	SPCC18.13	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPCC18.13	rpb9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.452606616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773646	2539246	2540699	275816	277223	SPCC18.13	SPBC800.08	SPCC18.13	gcd10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.147836618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773647	2539246	2542418	275816	278881	SPCC18.13	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC18.13	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.59140115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773648	2539246	2539668	275816	276223	SPCC18.13	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC18.13	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.205198621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773649	2539246	2543602	275816	280017	SPCC18.13	SPAPB1A11.04c	SPCC18.13	mca1	-	SPAPB1A11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.936375656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773650	2539246	2540555	275816	277082	SPCC18.13	SPBP16F5.02	SPCC18.13	mcs2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.930554787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773651	2539246	2540936	275816	277452	SPCC18.13	SPBC800.05c	SPCC18.13	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980649989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773652	2539246	2539205	275816	275775	SPCC18.13	SPCC4B3.15	SPCC18.13	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.369590955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773653	2539246	2539375	275816	275941	SPCC18.13	SPCC4G3.11	SPCC18.13	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.603665972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773654	2539246	2543087	275816	279520	SPCC18.13	SPAC30C2.04	SPCC18.13	SPAC30C2.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.41861901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773655	2539246	2543100	275816	279532	SPCC18.13	SPAC12B10.14c	SPCC18.13	tea5	-	ppk2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.30191828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773656	2539246	2540309	275816	276839	SPCC18.13	SPBC21B10.13c	SPCC18.13	yox1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384659224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773657	2538691	2542585	275276	279040	SPCC126.01c	SPAC31A2.13c	SPCC126.01c	sft1	SPCC576.18c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711058254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773658	2538691	2540913	275276	277429	SPCC126.01c	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC126.01c	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC576.18c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510192223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773659	2538691	2540825	275276	277343	SPCC126.01c	SPBC428.08c	SPCC126.01c	clr4	SPCC576.18c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709958486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773660	2538691	2538706	275276	275290	SPCC126.01c	SPCC338.08	SPCC126.01c	ctp1	SPCC576.18c	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.544723455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773661	2538691	2541283	275276	277796	SPCC126.01c	SPBP8B7.02	SPCC126.01c	rng9	SPCC576.18c	SPBP8B7.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819401938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773662	2538691	2542759	275276	279209	SPCC126.01c	SPAC9G1.07	SPCC126.01c	SPAC9G1.07	SPCC576.18c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.845310681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773663	2538691	2543628	275276	280042	SPCC126.01c	SPAC3H8.10	SPCC126.01c	spo20	SPCC576.18c	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.356288397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773664	2538691	2542881	275276	279326	SPCC126.01c	SPAC13F5.03c	SPCC126.01c	gld1	SPCC576.18c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.908804303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773665	2538691	2543602	275276	280017	SPCC126.01c	SPAPB1A11.04c	SPCC126.01c	mca1	SPCC576.18c	SPAPB1A11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.701096652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773666	2541166	2542812	277681	279259	SPBC725.15	SPAC6F6.01	ura5	cch1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871975563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773667	2541166	2540131	277681	276668	SPBC725.15	SPBC1778.05c	ura5	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.134591625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773668	2541166	2542293	277681	278761	SPBC725.15	SPAC17G8.14c	ura5	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.613435564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773669	2541166	2542378	277681	278842	SPBC725.15	SPAC1805.04	ura5	nup132	-	Nup133b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035169716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773670	2541166	2540161	277681	276696	SPBC725.15	SPBC13E7.03c	ura5	SPBC13E7.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874789448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773671	2541166	2540595	277681	277121	SPBC725.15	SPBC21C3.02c	ura5	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.179941315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773672	2541166	2541522	277681	278023	SPBC725.15	SPAC23E2.01	ura5	fep1	-	gaf2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816718721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773673	2541166	2539092	277681	275664	SPBC725.15	SPCC1259.08	ura5	SPCC1259.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816460485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773674	2541166	2542558	277681	279014	SPBC725.15	SPAC1952.07	ura5	rad1	-	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637216914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773675	2541166	2539023	277681	275596	SPBC725.15	SPCC594.05c	ura5	spf1	-	spp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.822373904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773676	2541166	2541544	277681	278044	SPBC725.15	SPAC22G7.06c	ura5	ura1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.254718452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773677	2541166	2542036	277681	278518	SPBC725.15	SPAC23A1.19c	ura5	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.941686205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773678	2541166	2542311	277681	278777	SPBC725.15	SPAC16A10.05c	ura5	dad1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.253953711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773679	2541166	2540797	277681	277316	SPBC725.15	SPBC18H10.11c	ura5	ppr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876170282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773680	2541166	2541800	277681	278291	SPBC725.15	SPAC732.02c	ura5	SPAC732.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.934512377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773681	2541166	2542513	277681	278971	SPBC725.15	SPAC1952.05	ura5	gcn5	-	kat2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866589772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773682	2541166	2541776	277681	278270	SPBC725.15	SPAC23H3.05c	ura5	swd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.911919787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773683	2541166	2543144	277681	279576	SPBC725.15	SPAC3F10.05c	ura5	mug113	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935550721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773684	2541166	2539845	277681	276393	SPBC725.15	SPBC12C2.02c	ura5	ste20	-	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.75994195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773685	2541166	2541735	277681	278229	SPBC725.15	SPAC7D4.04	ura5	atg11	-	taf1|cvt9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713046451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773686	2541166	2542469	277681	278930	SPBC725.15	SPAC19A8.04	ura5	erg5	-	cyp61	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03850745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773687	2541166	2540326	277681	276856	SPBC725.15	SPBC2G5.06c	ura5	hmt2	-	cad1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096145023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773688	2541166	2540751	277681	277273	SPBC725.15	SPBC20F10.10	ura5	psl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.126645543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773689	2541166	2539408	277681	275973	SPBC725.15	SPCC576.12c	ura5	mhf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379079543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773690	2541166	2539481	277681	276044	SPBC725.15	SPCC622.16c	ura5	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516879685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773691	2541166	2539715	277681	276268	SPBC725.15	SPBC1778.09	ura5	SPBC1778.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63861056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773692	2541166	2541713	277681	278208	SPBC725.15	SPAC3A12.12	ura5	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0364274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773693	2541166	2540910	277681	277426	SPBC725.15	SPBC577.02	ura5	rpl3801	-	rpl38-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324586029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773694	2541166	2538762	277681	275345	SPBC725.15	SPCC306.04c	ura5	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.78214012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773695	2541166	2541470	277681	277972	SPBC725.15	SPAPYUG7.04c	ura5	rpb9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.938098365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773696	2541166	2540164	277681	276699	SPBC725.15	SPBC1683.03c	ura5	SPBC1683.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096282366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773697	2541166	2542418	277681	278881	SPBC725.15	SPAC1805.07c	ura5	dad2	-	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.027614492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773698	2541166	2540516	277681	277044	SPBC725.15	SPBC21C3.01c	ura5	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035870478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773699	2541166	2541789	277681	278281	SPBC725.15	SPAC23H4.08	ura5	iwr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036411122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773700	2541166	2540936	277681	277452	SPBC725.15	SPBC800.05c	ura5	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979708675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773701	2541166	2542119	277681	278595	SPBC725.15	SPAC1834.08	ura5	mak1	-	phk3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392374041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773702	2541166	2542716	277681	279169	SPBC725.15	SPAC25H1.07	ura5	emc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.514895056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773703	2541166	2541478	277681	277980	SPBC725.15	SPAC2F7.17	ura5	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934224229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773704	2541166	2540787	277681	277306	SPBC725.15	SPBC1921.07c	ura5	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.941867037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773705	2542135	2540105	278611	276642	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC106.04	ubp8	ada1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865539079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773706	2542135	2539582	278611	276141	SPAC13A11.04c	SPCC594.07c	ubp8	bqt3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864569847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773707	2542135	2542378	278611	278842	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC1805.04	ubp8	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9897954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773708	2542135	2539035	278611	275608	SPAC13A11.04c	SPCC794.09c	ubp8	tef101	-	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930358674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773709	2542135	3361561	278611	280637	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC11E3.01c	ubp8	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.359825274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773710	2542135	2540068	278611	276606	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC1734.12c	ubp8	alg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.845563446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773711	2542135	2542701	278611	279154	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC26H5.05	ubp8	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.059856897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773712	2542135	2541082	278611	277597	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC577.11	ubp8	SPBC577.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820931856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773713	2542135	2540043	278611	276581	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC1198.12	ubp8	mfr1	-	SPBC660.02|fzr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036018515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773714	2542135	2539420	278611	275985	SPAC13A11.04c	SPCC970.07c	ubp8	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038511964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773715	2542135	2542677	278611	279130	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC26F1.10c	ubp8	pyp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810639803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773716	2542135	2540979	278611	277495	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC3H7.10	ubp8	elp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.408805046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773717	2542135	2538847	278611	275428	SPAC13A11.04c	SPCC594.06c	ubp8	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.814088015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773718	2542135	2542689	278611	279142	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC29B12.04	ubp8	snz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.409164398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773719	2542135	2540929	278611	277445	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC354.03	ubp8	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.257501214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773720	2542135	2539365	278611	275931	SPAC13A11.04c	SPCC24B10.16c	ubp8	SPCC24B10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632736659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773721	2542135	2540595	278611	277121	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC21C3.02c	ubp8	dep1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98893252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773722	2542135	2543563	278611	279979	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC664.02c	ubp8	arp8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989969508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773723	2542135	2540825	278611	277343	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC428.08c	ubp8	clr4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.858100883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773724	2542135	2542331	278611	278797	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC1834.05	ubp8	alg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978644192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773725	2542135	2542568	278611	279024	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC1952.02	ubp8	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573085782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773726	2542135	2542513	278611	278971	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC1952.05	ubp8	gcn5	-	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.050772823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773727	2542135	2542863	278611	279309	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC13G7.04c	ubp8	mac1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.39915286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773728	2542135	2543144	278611	279576	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC3F10.05c	ubp8	mug113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.912295954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773729	2542135	2542522	278611	278980	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC19A8.03	ubp8	ymr1	-	SPAC19A8.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.405483184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773730	2542135	2541413	278611	277921	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBPJ4664.06	ubp8	gpt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.05277032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773731	2542135	2540086	278611	276624	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC16H5.12c	ubp8	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101956565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773732	2542135	2541720	278611	278214	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC23H3.13c	ubp8	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318259527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773733	2542135	2541903	278611	278393	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC22F8.05	ubp8	SPAC22F8.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.164704949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773734	2542135	2542519	278611	278977	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC19G12.08	ubp8	scs7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935048964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773735	2542135	2541053	278611	277568	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC56F2.10c	ubp8	alg5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.850217365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773736	2542135	2542267	278611	278736	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAPYUK71.03c	ubp8	syn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639796821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773737	2542135	2541614	278611	278111	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC29A4.20	ubp8	elp3	-	kat9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.098829965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773738	2542135	2542060	278611	278538	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC23C11.14	ubp8	zhf1	-	zhf	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.502632268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773739	2542135	2539421	278611	275986	SPAC13A11.04c	SPCC794.11c	ubp8	ent3	-	SPCC794.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875863146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773740	2542135	2541017	278611	277532	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC36.07	ubp8	elp1	-	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.454656098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773741	2542135	2540821	278611	277339	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC800.03	ubp8	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.809629336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773742	2542135	2540001	278611	276545	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC1289.13c	ubp8	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934547109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773743	2542135	2542283	278611	278751	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC27F1.08	ubp8	pdt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.346851193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773744	2542135	2539160	278611	275732	SPAC13A11.04c	SPCC18.17c	ubp8	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.078754524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773745	2542135	2543567	278611	279983	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC890.03	ubp8	ppk16	-	mug92	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.86609916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773746	2542135	2542458	278611	278919	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC30.02c	ubp8	SPAC30.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.458409983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773747	2542135	2540346	278611	276875	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC2F12.03c	ubp8	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199668543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773748	2542135	2539013	278611	275586	SPAC13A11.04c	SPCC364.03	ubp8	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.199848163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773749	2542135	2543437	278611	279857	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAPB1A10.14	ubp8	pof15	-	SPAPB1A10.14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818148973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773750	2542135	2539668	278611	276223	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC11B10.10c	ubp8	pht1	-	pi001	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.405050748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773751	2542135	2541380	278611	277891	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBPB2B2.13	ubp8	gal1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.248676564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773752	2542135	2539205	278611	275775	SPAC13A11.04c	SPCC4B3.15	ubp8	mid1	-	dmf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.617432033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773753	2542135	2539178	278611	275749	SPAC13A11.04c	SPCC1682.14	ubp8	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.562961127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773754	2542135	2543384	278611	279806	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC637.06	ubp8	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.831121786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773755	2542135	2542159	278611	278635	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC1834.09	ubp8	mug51	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036248021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773756	2542135	2543471	278611	279891	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC513.07	ubp8	SPAC513.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569530868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773757	2542135	2538834	278611	275415	SPAC13A11.04c	SPCC126.08c	ubp8	SPCC126.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.079186102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773758	2542135	2541576	278611	278073	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC1348.02	ubp8	SPBC1348.02	-	SPAC1348.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810085069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773759	2542135	2542094	278611	278571	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC29B12.06c	ubp8	rcd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930981642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773760	2542135	2540208	278611	276741	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC9B6.03	ubp8	SPBC9B6.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101672157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773761	2542135	2541062	278611	277577	SPAC13A11.04c	SPBC660.11	ubp8	tcg1	-	mug187	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.506229358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773762	2542135	2543616	278611	280030	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC4A8.09c	ubp8	cwf21	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808005033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773763	2540966	2543387	277482	279809	SPBC3D6.09	SPAPB1E7.02c	dpb4	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.63732141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773764	3361323	2538939	280399	275514	SPBC30D10.04	SPCC1672.04c	swi3	SPCC1672.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452186532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773765	3361323	2542895	280399	279339	SPBC30D10.04	SPAC13G6.10c	swi3	asl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.378999982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773766	3361323	2541512	280399	278013	SPBC30D10.04	SPAC11E3.08c	swi3	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445422633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773767	3361323	2540415	280399	276943	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC30B4.06c	swi3	SPBC30B4.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258795522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773768	3361323	2540964	280399	277480	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC365.16	swi3	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.777008857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773769	3361323	2540326	280399	276856	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC2G5.06c	swi3	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.497372891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773770	3361323	2539667	280399	276222	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC13G1.08c	swi3	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.20630137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773771	3361323	2540599	280399	277125	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC29A3.10c	swi3	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.381791905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773772	2540355	2541902	276884	278392	SPBC25B2.11	SPAC27E2.07	pof2	pvg2	-	mug53	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317349471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773773	2540355	2539788	276884	276338	SPBC25B2.11	SPBC17D1.02	pof2	dph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.316052931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773774	2540355	2541650	276884	278146	SPBC25B2.11	SPAC14C4.12c	pof2	laf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509612429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773775	2540355	2542747	276884	279197	SPBC25B2.11	SPAC15A10.06	pof2	SPAC15A10.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.414634273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773776	2540355	2539201	276884	275772	SPBC25B2.11	SPCC188.09c	pof2	pfl4	-	SPCC188.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.991982935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773777	2540355	2539576	276884	276136	SPBC25B2.11	SPCC794.01c	pof2	zwf2	-	SPCC794.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.839106445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773778	2540355	2540467	276884	276995	SPBC25B2.11	SPBC2G2.07c	pof2	mug178	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.192499949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773779	2540355	2541923	276884	278411	SPBC25B2.11	SPAC23C4.09c	pof2	SPAC23C4.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.752009351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773780	2540355	2542791	276884	279240	SPBC25B2.11	SPAC167.04	pof2	pam17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.012892173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773781	2540355	2541021	276884	277536	SPBC25B2.11	SPBC3B8.10c	pof2	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.048647776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773782	2540355	2540797	276884	277316	SPBC25B2.11	SPBC18H10.11c	pof2	ppr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.978786676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773783	2540355	2542863	276884	279309	SPBC25B2.11	SPAC13G7.04c	pof2	mac1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319569304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773784	2540355	2543144	276884	279576	SPBC25B2.11	SPAC3F10.05c	pof2	mug113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769486711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773785	2540355	2540352	276884	276881	SPBC25B2.11	SPBC215.03c	pof2	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.838374271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773786	2540355	2540396	276884	276924	SPBC25B2.11	SPBC31F10.12	pof2	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.056209001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773787	2540355	2538767	276884	275350	SPBC25B2.11	SPCC1672.12c	pof2	get4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38683043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773788	2540355	2542437	276884	278899	SPBC25B2.11	SPAC17A5.01	pof2	pex6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851607906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773789	2540355	2541186	276884	277700	SPBC25B2.11	SPBC725.01	pof2	SPBC725.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.327445344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773790	2540355	2543350	276884	279772	SPBC25B2.11	SPAC56E4.03	pof2	SPAC56E4.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.728196437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773791	2540355	2538762	276884	275345	SPBC25B2.11	SPCC306.04c	pof2	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.169055959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773792	2540355	2538756	276884	275339	SPBC25B2.11	SPCC1795.10c	pof2	SPCC1795.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.195545804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773793	2540355	2543427	276884	279847	SPBC25B2.11	SPAPB1A10.15	pof2	arv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452454727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773794	2540355	2540064	276884	276602	SPBC25B2.11	SPBC1718.02	pof2	hop1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.128050581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773795	2540355	2540489	276884	277017	SPBC25B2.11	SPBC25H2.03	pof2	SPBC25H2.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647246059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773796	2540355	2540828	276884	277346	SPBC25B2.11	SPBC4B4.06	pof2	vps25	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449507402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773797	2540355	2542571	276884	279027	SPBC25B2.11	SPAC589.02c	pof2	med13	-	spTrap240|srb9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867556897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773798	2540060	2539774	276598	276325	SPBC106.01	SPBC17A3.10	mph1	pas4	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	pi036	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812218702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773799	2540060	2542207	276598	278682	SPBC106.01	SPAC17H9.10c	mph1	ddb1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.771002013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773800	2540060	2539050	276598	275623	SPBC106.01	SPCC11E10.08	mph1	rik1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.784913904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773801	2540060	2540279	276598	276810	SPBC106.01	SPBC3B8.04c	mph1	SPBC3B8.04c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.560988076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773802	2540060	2542895	276598	279339	SPBC106.01	SPAC13G6.10c	mph1	asl1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.693219072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773803	2540060	2542862	276598	279308	SPBC106.01	SPAC140.03	mph1	arb1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.091593699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773804	2540060	2542390	276598	278854	SPBC106.01	SPAC6F6.11c	mph1	SPAC6F6.11c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.817729345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773805	2540060	2541512	276598	278013	SPBC106.01	SPAC11E3.08c	mph1	nse6	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451552342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773806	2540060	2540913	276598	277429	SPBC106.01	SPBC56F2.08c	mph1	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509404695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773807	2540060	2542066	276598	278543	SPBC106.01	SPAC227.05	mph1	SPAC227.05	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.943949452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773808	2540060	2539582	276598	276141	SPBC106.01	SPCC594.07c	mph1	bqt3	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.919001962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773809	2540060	2542358	276598	278823	SPBC106.01	SPAC1782.09c	mph1	clp1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.341340531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773810	2540060	2541650	276598	278146	SPBC106.01	SPAC14C4.12c	mph1	laf1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.551420456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773811	2540060	2542378	276598	278842	SPBC106.01	SPAC1805.04	mph1	nup132	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.588001918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773812	2540060	2543524	276598	279942	SPBC106.01	SPAC4D7.07c	mph1	csi2	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPAC4D7.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.559436404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773813	2540060	2538985	276598	275559	SPBC106.01	SPCC13B11.03c	mph1	SPCC13B11.03c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867482686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773814	2540060	2538896	276598	275474	SPBC106.01	SPCC584.11c	mph1	SPCC584.11c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.001650147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773815	2540060	2542237	276598	278709	SPBC106.01	SPAC19E9.02	mph1	fin1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.23282079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773816	2540060	2539202	276598	275773	SPBC106.01	SPCC162.10	mph1	ppk33	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.459242066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773817	2540060	2541853	276598	278344	SPBC106.01	SPAC2F3.11	mph1	SPAC2F3.11	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984623858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773818	2540060	2540410	276598	276938	SPBC106.01	SPBC2D10.04	mph1	SPBC2D10.04	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867000282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773819	2540060	2541051	276598	277566	SPBC106.01	SPBC3E7.08c	mph1	rad13	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.448860806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773820	2540060	2542747	276598	279197	SPBC106.01	SPAC15A10.06	mph1	SPAC15A10.06	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.560705918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773821	2540060	2541345	276598	277856	SPBC106.01	SPBP35G2.07	mph1	ilv1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.463217977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773822	2540060	2541633	276598	278129	SPBC106.01	SPAC664.01c	mph1	swi6	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.886201914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773823	2540060	2540491	276598	277019	SPBC106.01	SPBC28E12.04	mph1	SPBC28E12.04	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814574434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773824	2540060	2539309	276598	275876	SPBC106.01	SPCC4G3.19	mph1	alp16	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.128840384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773825	2540060	2540455	276598	276983	SPBC106.01	SPBC215.05	mph1	gpd1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.928719759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773826	2540060	2542613	276598	279067	SPBC106.01	SPAC18B11.03c	mph1	SPAC18B11.03c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814564655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773827	2540060	2543098	276598	279530	SPBC106.01	SPAC4A8.06c	mph1	SPAC4A8.06c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92696748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773828	2540060	2539420	276598	275985	SPBC106.01	SPCC970.07c	mph1	raf2	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.49765138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773829	2540060	2542107	276598	278583	SPBC106.01	SPAC30.01c	mph1	sec72	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	sec7b|sec702	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.273511907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773830	2540060	2542677	276598	279130	SPBC106.01	SPAC26F1.10c	mph1	pyp1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.080329233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773831	2540060	2538847	276598	275428	SPBC106.01	SPCC594.06c	mph1	SPCC594.06c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.619074071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773832	2540060	2543579	276598	279994	SPBC106.01	SPAC9.11	mph1	SPAC9.11	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.744974586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773833	2540060	2538801	276598	275382	SPBC106.01	SPCC285.13c	mph1	nup60	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.408167221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773834	2540060	2542709	276598	279162	SPBC106.01	SPAC26F1.08c	mph1	SPAC26F1.08c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19680252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773835	2540060	2540919	276598	277435	SPBC106.01	SPBC543.07	mph1	pek1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	mkk1|skh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.893812246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773836	2540060	2543159	276598	279590	SPBC106.01	SPAC3C7.09	mph1	set8	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04584469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773837	2540060	2539331	276598	275897	SPBC106.01	SPCC24B10.09	mph1	rps1702	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	rps17|rps17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707086969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773838	2540060	3361385	276598	280461	SPBC106.01	SPAC1639.02c	mph1	trk2	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPAC1F5.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148676418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773839	2540060	2542567	276598	279023	SPBC106.01	SPAC328.05	mph1	SPAC328.05	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813090671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773840	2540060	2540295	276598	276826	SPBC106.01	SPBC3B8.05	mph1	SPBC3B8.05	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	dph1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.406742859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773841	2540060	2540851	276598	277368	SPBC106.01	SPBC4F6.04	mph1	rpl2502	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	rpl23a-2|rpl25b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.344812484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773842	2540060	2541580	276598	278077	SPBC106.01	SPAC1687.05	mph1	pli1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.858569667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773843	2540060	2543641	276598	280055	SPBC106.01	SPAC3H5.08c	mph1	SPAC3H5.08c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.077020829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773844	2540060	2543551	276598	279968	SPBC106.01	SPAC4G8.06c	mph1	trm12	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.24531842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773845	2540060	2541905	276598	278395	SPBC106.01	SPAC6G9.01c	mph1	SPAC6G9.01c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.875577411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773846	2540060	2543078	276598	279511	SPBC106.01	SPAC31A2.15c	mph1	dcc1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.76451098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773847	2540060	2542253	276598	278723	SPBC106.01	SPAC17H9.04c	mph1	SPAC17H9.04c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.933966724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773848	2540060	3361391	276598	280467	SPBC106.01	SPAC13G6.01c	mph1	rad8	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPAC5H10.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.671194318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773849	2540060	2542239	276598	278711	SPBC106.01	SPAC18G6.02c	mph1	chp1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.05606483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773850	2540060	2542036	276598	278518	SPBC106.01	SPAC23A1.19c	mph1	hrq1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.594088608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773851	2540060	2539467	276598	276030	SPBC106.01	SPCC417.07c	mph1	mto1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.122051508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773852	2540060	2542311	276598	278777	SPBC106.01	SPAC16A10.05c	mph1	dad1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.060426879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773853	2540060	2541885	276598	278375	SPBC106.01	SPAC22H10.03c	mph1	kap114	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923283552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773854	2540060	2543020	276598	279456	SPBC106.01	SPAC10F6.13c	mph1	SPAC10F6.13c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093310046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773855	2540060	2539870	276598	276416	SPBC106.01	SPBC1709.18	mph1	tif452	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPBC409.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.859575297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773856	2540060	2541649	276598	278145	SPBC106.01	SPAC1F3.06c	mph1	spo15	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.32064872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773857	2540060	2541801	276598	278292	SPBC106.01	SPAC2F7.08c	mph1	snf5	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.017679226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773858	2540060	2541776	276598	278270	SPBC106.01	SPAC23H3.05c	mph1	swd1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.4746577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773859	2540060	2541093	276598	277608	SPBC106.01	SPBC646.08c	mph1	SPBC646.08c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987178342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773860	2540060	2539845	276598	276393	SPBC106.01	SPBC12C2.02c	mph1	ste20	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.607479694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773861	2540060	2543445	276598	279865	SPBC106.01	SPAC4F10.13c	mph1	mpd2	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.342520686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773862	2540060	2538770	276598	275353	SPBC106.01	SPCC1753.02c	mph1	git3	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864124863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773863	2540060	2541892	276598	278382	SPBC106.01	SPAP27G11.02	mph1	SPAP27G11.02	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048374953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773864	2540060	2542123	276598	278599	SPBC106.01	SPAC18G6.15	mph1	mal3	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.753237546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773865	2540060	2540987	276598	277503	SPBC106.01	SPBC36B7.05c	mph1	SPBC36B7.05c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.203583464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773866	2540060	2540352	276598	276881	SPBC106.01	SPBC215.03c	mph1	csn1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.095466716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773867	2540060	2543412	276598	279834	SPBC106.01	SPAC637.07	mph1	moe1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87327681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773868	2540060	2539754	276598	276306	SPBC106.01	SPBC16C6.04	mph1	dbl6	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPBC16C6.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.142970856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773869	2540060	2540396	276598	276924	SPBC106.01	SPBC31F10.12	mph1	tma20	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.584617974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773870	2540060	2542983	276598	279421	SPBC106.01	SPAC11D3.15	mph1	SPAC11D3.15	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.080866197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773871	2540060	2538800	276598	275381	SPBC106.01	SPCC1322.06	mph1	kap113	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.700420548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773872	2540060	2539073	276598	275645	SPBC106.01	SPCC1322.02	mph1	pxd1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPCC1322.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.122510244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773873	2540060	2539898	276598	276444	SPBC106.01	SPBC12D12.07c	mph1	trx2	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.976417842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773874	2540060	2539484	276598	276047	SPBC106.01	SPCC594.04c	mph1	SPCC594.04c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779692496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773875	2540060	2541109	276598	277624	SPBC106.01	SPBC6B1.02	mph1	ppk30	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.861980885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773876	2540060	2542469	276598	278930	SPBC106.01	SPAC19A8.04	mph1	erg5	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	cyp61	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.501419822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773877	2540060	2541496	276598	277998	SPBC106.01	SPAC23D3.09	mph1	arp42	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.837466019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773878	2540060	2541096	276598	277611	SPBC106.01	SPBC725.10	mph1	SPBC725.10	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933415984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773879	2540060	2543667	276598	280081	SPBC106.01	SPAC4H3.02c	mph1	swc3	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.561650043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773880	2540060	2541388	276598	277899	SPBC106.01	SPBP8B7.30c	mph1	thi5	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.144888079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773881	2540060	2542452	276598	278913	SPBC106.01	SPAC1D4.02c	mph1	SPAC1D4.02c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317454192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773882	2540060	2539603	276598	276161	SPBC106.01	SPBC1289.06c	mph1	ppr8	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.543072022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773883	2540060	2538871	276598	275450	SPBC106.01	SPCC1259.14c	mph1	meu27	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	B8647-6	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935323817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773884	2540060	2543643	276598	280057	SPBC106.01	SPAC3G9.07c	mph1	hos2	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	hda1|phd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.709370351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773885	2540060	2541899	276598	278389	SPBC106.01	SPAC22E12.11c	mph1	set3	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.20412128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773886	2540060	2542193	276598	278668	SPBC106.01	SPAC9G1.11c	mph1	spn4	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807469498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773887	2540060	2539586	276598	276145	SPBC106.01	SPCC70.08c	mph1	SPCC70.08c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814177513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773888	2540060	2541187	276598	277701	SPBC106.01	SPBC776.14	mph1	plh1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044516945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773889	2540060	2540628	276598	277154	SPBC106.01	SPBC25B2.08	mph1	SPBC25B2.08	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.765879579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773890	2540060	2543244	276598	279672	SPBC106.01	SPAC6B12.06c	mph1	rrg9	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575581282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773891	2540060	2542976	276598	279414	SPBC106.01	SPAC9E9.09c	mph1	atd1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.253693186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773892	2540060	2541326	276598	277838	SPBC106.01	SPBP35G2.03c	mph1	sgo1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98775104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773893	2540060	2540394	276598	276922	SPBC106.01	SPBC2D10.09	mph1	snr1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPBC2D10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101960342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773894	2540060	2541903	276598	278393	SPBC106.01	SPAC22F8.05	mph1	SPAC22F8.05	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.993160265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773895	2540060	2543105	276598	279537	SPBC106.01	SPAC343.10	mph1	met11	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	mthfr2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979735253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773896	2540060	2539481	276598	276044	SPBC106.01	SPCC622.16c	mph1	epe1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.355346104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773897	2540060	2541366	276598	277877	SPBC106.01	SPBP4H10.12	mph1	SPBP4H10.12	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.15157948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773898	2540060	2543080	276598	279513	SPBC106.01	SPAC3A11.10c	mph1	SPAC3A11.10c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922960598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773899	2540060	2542437	276598	278899	SPBC106.01	SPAC17A5.01	mph1	pex6	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096978136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773900	2540060	2539368	276598	275934	SPBC106.01	SPCC16A11.07	mph1	coq10	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.77447281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773901	2540060	2542720	276598	279171	SPBC106.01	SPAC25G10.05c	mph1	his1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932388415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773902	2540060	2542125	276598	278601	SPBC106.01	SPAP8A3.03	mph1	SPAP8A3.03	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035548283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773903	2540060	2540201	276598	276734	SPBC106.01	SPBC13A2.04c	mph1	ptr2	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPBC13A2.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.409498979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773904	2540060	2543224	276598	279652	SPBC106.01	SPAPB8E5.10	mph1	SPAPB8E5.10	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152351444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773905	2540060	2540967	276598	277483	SPBC106.01	SPBC36B7.08c	mph1	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.24923132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773906	2540060	2542597	276598	279051	SPBC106.01	SPAP8A3.07c	mph1	SPAP8A3.07c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514727249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773907	2540060	2539847	276598	276395	SPBC106.01	SPBC530.14c	mph1	dsk1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.747224762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773908	2540060	2539363	276598	275929	SPBC106.01	SPCC613.02	mph1	SPCC613.02	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195022126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773909	2540060	2541186	276598	277700	SPBC106.01	SPBC725.01	mph1	SPBC725.01	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095162192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773910	2540060	2541614	276598	278111	SPBC106.01	SPAC29A4.20	mph1	elp3	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	kat9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036777786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773911	2540060	2538690	276598	275275	SPBC106.01	SPCC1393.05	mph1	ers1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.406888934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773912	2540060	3361105	276598	280181	SPBC106.01	SPCC188.10c	mph1	SPCC188.10c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982767702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773913	2540060	2542829	276598	279276	SPBC106.01	SPAC13D6.02c	mph1	byr3	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.868333811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773914	2540060	3361134	276598	280210	SPBC106.01	SPCC737.09c	mph1	hmt1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPCC74.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036437581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773915	2540060	2543254	276598	279682	SPBC106.01	SPAC1006.03c	mph1	red1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	iss3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.185918212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773916	2540060	2543139	276598	279571	SPBC106.01	SPAC12G12.03	mph1	cip2	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.085954885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773917	2540060	2541742	276598	278236	SPBC106.01	SPAC22H10.09	mph1	SPAC22H10.09	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.334469453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773918	2540060	2538848	276598	275429	SPBC106.01	SPCC613.12c	mph1	raf1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.956775974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773919	2540060	3361520	276598	280596	SPBC106.01	SPAC1610.02c	mph1	SPAC1610.02c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443636181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773920	2540060	2542869	276598	279314	SPBC106.01	SPAC140.02	mph1	gar2	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.55937942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773921	2540060	2541628	276598	278124	SPBC106.01	SPAC110.02	mph1	pds5	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.192040641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773922	2540060	2539908	276598	276454	SPBC106.01	SPBC13E7.06	mph1	msd1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	mug172	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.331121427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773923	2540060	2539763	276598	276314	SPBC106.01	SPBC1861.05	mph1	SPBC1861.05	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870151879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773924	2540060	2539631	276598	276187	SPBC106.01	SPBC16G5.16	mph1	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.344806726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773925	2540060	2542198	276598	278673	SPBC106.01	SPAC6F12.09	mph1	rdp1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513754963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773926	2540060	2538907	276598	275484	SPBC106.01	SPCC24B10.19c	mph1	nts1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.273047113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773927	2540060	2539160	276598	275732	SPBC106.01	SPCC18.17c	mph1	SPCC18.17c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807593872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773928	2540060	2541786	276598	278278	SPBC106.01	SPAC22F3.08c	mph1	rok1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.306646374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773929	2540060	2540460	276598	276988	SPBC106.01	SPBC2A9.07c	mph1	hpz1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPBC2A9.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.071849472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773930	2540060	2541370	276598	277881	SPBC106.01	SPBP8B7.07c	mph1	set6	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.653467068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773931	2540060	2541287	276598	277800	SPBC106.01	SPBP22H7.05c	mph1	abo2	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.076411502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773932	2540060	2538844	276598	275425	SPBC106.01	SPCC1183.09c	mph1	pmp31	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	mug75	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.330124119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773933	2540060	2540619	276598	277145	SPBC106.01	SPBC25H2.15	mph1	SPBC25H2.15	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.251551399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773934	2540060	2543670	276598	280084	SPBC106.01	SPAPB1E7.06c	mph1	eme1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.631791175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773935	2540060	2543567	276598	279983	SPBC106.01	SPAC890.03	mph1	ppk16	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	mug92	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.672072646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773936	2540060	2540498	276598	277026	SPBC106.01	SPBC27.02c	mph1	ask1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.81245106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773937	2540060	2542401	276598	278865	SPBC106.01	SPAC1142.02c	mph1	SPAC1142.02c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPAC17G6.19c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201075885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773938	2540060	2541121	276598	277636	SPBC106.01	SPBC609.03	mph1	iqw1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	iqwd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.937627354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773939	2540060	2539925	276598	276469	SPBC106.01	SPBC16H5.13	mph1	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.124700401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773940	2540060	2539030	276598	275603	SPBC106.01	SPCP1E11.02	mph1	ppk38	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982941572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773941	2540060	2542541	276598	278998	SPBC106.01	SPAC1B3.03c	mph1	wis2	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	cyp5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.27236607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773942	2540060	2538966	276598	275540	SPBC106.01	SPCC18.10	mph1	SPCC18.10	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439639325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773943	2540060	2539246	276598	275816	SPBC106.01	SPCC18.13	mph1	SPCC18.13	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.671886493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773944	2540060	2543096	276598	279528	SPBC106.01	SPAC977.05c	mph1	SPAC977.05c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767145961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773945	2540060	2539614	276598	276172	SPBC106.01	SPBC17D11.08	mph1	SPBC17D11.08	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148290857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773946	2540060	2542955	276598	279395	SPBC106.01	SPAC11E3.12	mph1	SPAC11E3.12	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199290144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773947	2540060	2539346	276598	275912	SPBC106.01	SPCC569.04	mph1	SPCC569.04	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.922325535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773948	2540060	2541531	276598	278031	SPBC106.01	SPAC25A8.01c	mph1	fft3	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.655080251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773949	2540060	2542731	276598	279181	SPBC106.01	SPAC5H10.09c	mph1	SPAC5H10.09c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32104856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773950	2540060	2542418	276598	278881	SPBC106.01	SPAC1805.07c	mph1	dad2	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.107700834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773951	2540060	2543377	276598	279799	SPBC106.01	SPAC3H1.07	mph1	aru1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	car3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036105001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773952	2540060	3361329	276598	280405	SPBC106.01	SPBC25H2.10c	mph1	SPBC25H2.10c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.970866163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773953	2540060	2543091	276598	279524	SPBC106.01	SPAC12G12.15	mph1	sif3	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.559108564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773954	2540060	2539188	276598	275759	SPBC106.01	SPCC1827.04	mph1	vms1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPCC1827.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.905417517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773955	2540060	2542826	276598	279273	SPBC106.01	SPAC13G6.09	mph1	SPAC13G6.09	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713480402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773956	2540060	2539668	276598	276223	SPBC106.01	SPBC11B10.10c	mph1	pht1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.002025407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773957	2540060	2542878	276598	279323	SPBC106.01	SPAC57A10.09c	mph1	nhp6	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.941372348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773958	2540060	2540182	276598	276715	SPBC106.01	SPBC16G5.06	mph1	SPBC16G5.06	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877843826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773959	2540060	2542303	276598	278770	SPBC106.01	SPAC1687.21	mph1	SPAC1687.21	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPAC222.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92872276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773960	2540060	2539207	276598	275777	SPBC106.01	SPCC285.09c	mph1	cgs2	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	pde1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.018995581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773961	2540060	2539928	276598	276472	SPBC106.01	SPBC1604.08c	mph1	imp1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.002413357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773962	2540060	3361476	276598	280552	SPBC106.01	SPAC16A10.04	mph1	rho4	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037291901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773963	2540060	2539736	276598	276288	SPBC106.01	SPBC12C2.12c	mph1	glo1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPBC21D10.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934710555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773964	2540060	2540489	276598	277017	SPBC106.01	SPBC25H2.03	mph1	SPBC25H2.03	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.870819269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773965	2540060	2540146	276598	276683	SPBC106.01	SPBC17A3.06	mph1	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	pi040	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.157166597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773966	2540060	2539189	276598	275760	SPBC106.01	SPCC1682.16	mph1	rpt4	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPCC306.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038758148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773967	2540060	2539178	276598	275749	SPBC106.01	SPCC1682.14	mph1	rpl1902	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	rpl19-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.413548899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773968	2540060	2542244	276598	278714	SPBC106.01	SPAC19G12.13c	mph1	poz1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.559768433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773969	2540060	2543486	276598	279906	SPBC106.01	SPAC959.07	mph1	rps403	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	rps4|rps4-3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.838711215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773970	2540060	2541946	276598	278433	SPBC106.01	SPAC2G11.04	mph1	SPAC2G11.04	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.14815036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773971	2540060	3361410	276598	280486	SPBC106.01	SPAC1527.01	mph1	mok11	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPAC23D3.15	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03547618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773972	2540060	2541806	276598	278297	SPBC106.01	SPAC4G8.13c	mph1	prz1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.365787442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773973	2540060	2543387	276598	279809	SPBC106.01	SPAPB1E7.02c	mph1	mcl1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.355878772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773974	2540060	2542886	276598	279331	SPBC106.01	SPAC1486.01	mph1	SPAC1486.01	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	sod2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.566875878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773975	2540060	2543471	276598	279891	SPBC106.01	SPAC513.07	mph1	SPAC513.07	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.212905699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773976	2540060	2543087	276598	279520	SPBC106.01	SPAC30C2.04	mph1	SPAC30C2.04	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.8725012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773977	2540060	2539014	276598	275587	SPBC106.01	SPCC18B5.05c	mph1	SPCC18B5.05c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.515981544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773978	2540060	2542175	276598	278650	SPBC106.01	SPAC1F3.02c	mph1	mkh1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.402891134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773979	2540060	2538920	276598	275497	SPBC106.01	SPCC1840.05c	mph1	SPCC1840.05c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.815308644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773980	2540060	2541867	276598	278357	SPBC106.01	SPAC22E12.14c	mph1	sck2	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.863563405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773981	2540060	2541808	276598	278299	SPBC106.01	SPAC22A12.14c	mph1	SPAC22A12.14c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810592677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773982	2540060	2543372	276598	279794	SPBC106.01	SPAPB1A10.09	mph1	ase1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.248687545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773983	2540060	2538822	276598	275403	SPBC106.01	SPCC1840.02c	mph1	bgs4	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	cwg1|orb11|pbr1|sph1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.233448464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773984	2540060	2540310	276598	276840	SPBC106.01	SPBC29B5.04c	mph1	SPBC29B5.04c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205669457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773985	2540060	2543501	276598	279919	SPBC106.01	SPAC664.14	mph1	amt2	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044511894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773986	2540060	2539148	276598	275720	SPBC106.01	SPCC132.04c	mph1	gdh2	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874156447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773987	2540060	2540787	276598	277306	SPBC106.01	SPBC1921.07c	mph1	sgf29	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.32683787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773988	2540600	2538922	277126	275499	SPBC4.05	SPCC16C4.10	mlo2	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.902652553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773989	2540600	2542555	277126	279012	SPBC4.05	SPAC1952.06c	mlo2	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.89490038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773990	2540600	2541488	277126	277990	SPBC4.05	SPAC227.17c	mlo2	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4666085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773991	2540600	2541806	277126	278297	SPBC4.05	SPAC4G8.13c	mlo2	prz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.865752244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773992	2540416	2542072	276944	278549	SPBC30B4.02c	SPAP32A8.03c	SPBC30B4.02c	bop1	-	SPAP32A8.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813641296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773993	2540416	2542598	276944	279052	SPBC30B4.02c	SPAC6G10.08	SPBC30B4.02c	idp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.518274272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773994	2540416	2542066	276944	278543	SPBC30B4.02c	SPAC227.05	SPBC30B4.02c	SPAC227.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.323608389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773995	2540416	2542812	276944	279259	SPBC30B4.02c	SPAC6F6.01	SPBC30B4.02c	cch1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318124548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773996	2540416	2541316	276944	277828	SPBC30B4.02c	SPBP19A11.02c	SPBC30B4.02c	SPBP19A11.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868505566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773997	2540416	2539575	276944	276135	SPBC30B4.02c	SPCP20C8.02c	SPBC30B4.02c	SPCP20C8.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.921800284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773998	2540416	2542023	276944	278506	SPBC30B4.02c	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC30B4.02c	ufd2	-	SPAC145.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510363813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
773999	2540416	2542530	276944	278988	SPBC30B4.02c	SPAC1399.02	SPBC30B4.02c	SPAC1399.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.442593804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774000	2540416	2542981	276944	279419	SPBC30B4.02c	SPAC824.02	SPBC30B4.02c	bst1	-	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.254275326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774001	2540416	2539023	276944	275596	SPBC30B4.02c	SPCC594.05c	SPBC30B4.02c	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511281782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774002	2540416	2541776	276944	278270	SPBC30B4.02c	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC30B4.02c	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323553667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774003	2540416	2539293	276944	275861	SPBC30B4.02c	SPCC553.08c	SPBC30B4.02c	ria1	-	SPCC553.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.30740102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774004	2540416	2538810	276944	275391	SPBC30B4.02c	SPCC338.02	SPBC30B4.02c	mug112	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814956386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774005	2540416	2542933	276944	279374	SPBC30B4.02c	SPAPYUG7.06	SPBC30B4.02c	sdu1	-	mug67|hag1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874773248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774006	2540416	2541720	276944	278214	SPBC30B4.02c	SPAC23H3.13c	SPBC30B4.02c	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.257270714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774007	2540416	5802861	276944	857999	SPBC30B4.02c	SPAC1D4.01	SPBC30B4.02c	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.336749191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774008	2540416	2539519	276944	276081	SPBC30B4.02c	SPCC364.05	SPBC30B4.02c	vps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189027259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774009	2540416	2540946	276944	277462	SPBC30B4.02c	SPBC36.04	SPBC30B4.02c	cys11	-	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636854533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774010	2540416	2539763	276944	276314	SPBC30B4.02c	SPBC1861.05	SPBC30B4.02c	SPBC1861.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145216708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774011	2540416	2541909	276944	278399	SPBC30B4.02c	SPAC227.01c	SPBC30B4.02c	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.88027059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774012	2540416	2541502	276944	278004	SPBC30B4.02c	SPAC23D3.04c	SPBC30B4.02c	gpd2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989093463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774013	2543639	2540043	280053	276581	SPAC458.03	SPBC1198.12	tel2	mfr1	-	SPBC660.02|fzr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324642258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774014	2543639	2540929	280053	277445	SPAC458.03	SPBC354.03	tel2	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320738847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774015	2543639	2541249	280053	277763	SPAC458.03	SPBC947.01	tel2	alf1	-	SPBC947.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.518386633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774016	2543639	2540886	280053	277403	SPAC458.03	SPBC4F6.10	tel2	vps901	-	vps9a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042815835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774017	2543639	2539043	280053	275616	SPAC458.03	SPCC1235.08c	tel2	pdh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935723917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774018	2543639	2543136	280053	279568	SPAC458.03	SPBC1348.07	tel2	SPBC1348.07	-	SPAC1348.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.203885087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774019	2543639	2539710	280053	276263	SPAC458.03	SPBC1683.08	tel2	ght4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.911734454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774020	2542277	2539050	278746	275623	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC11E10.08	dbr1	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.93421663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774021	2542277	2540105	278746	276642	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC106.04	dbr1	ada1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700537317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774022	2542277	2542382	278746	278846	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC6G10.06	dbr1	SPAC6G10.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.259785107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774023	2542277	2542518	278746	278976	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC1B3.16c	dbr1	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637561815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774024	2542277	2541512	278746	278013	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC11E3.08c	dbr1	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.743294228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774025	2542277	2540913	278746	277429	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC56F2.08c	dbr1	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.475045472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774026	2542277	2538977	278746	275551	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC1020.06c	dbr1	tal1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810315596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774027	2542277	2543064	278746	279497	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC3G6.01	dbr1	hrp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.356598187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774028	2542277	2542643	278746	279097	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC2C4.07c	dbr1	dis32	-	SPAC2C4.07c|dis3L2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.381035836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774029	2542277	2542378	278746	278842	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC1805.04	dbr1	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.211653683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774030	2542277	2538993	278746	275567	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC162.12	dbr1	tco89	-	SPCC1753.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.50461314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774031	2542277	3361561	278746	280637	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC11E3.01c	dbr1	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.022009287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774032	2542277	2541853	278746	278344	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC2F3.11	dbr1	SPAC2F3.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.560124109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774033	2542277	2541117	278746	277632	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC646.13	dbr1	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.011187966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774034	2542277	2540347	278746	276876	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC30B4.08	dbr1	eri1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.648973273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774035	2542277	2542701	278746	279154	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC26H5.05	dbr1	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.323671421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774036	2542277	2540455	278746	276983	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC215.05	dbr1	gpd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63557104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774037	2542277	2538806	278746	275387	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC1840.09	dbr1	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643292098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774038	2542277	2539208	278746	275778	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC1450.11c	dbr1	cek1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.747245671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774039	2542277	2541286	278746	277799	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC9B6.11c	dbr1	SPBC9B6.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.503305208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774040	2542277	2540975	278746	277491	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC354.12	dbr1	gpd3	-	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704052282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774041	2542277	2539420	278746	275985	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC970.07c	dbr1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.855381283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774042	2542277	2541208	278746	277722	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC887.04c	dbr1	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.619346937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774043	2542277	2542677	278746	279130	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC26F1.10c	dbr1	pyp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.247288901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774044	2542277	2541058	278746	277573	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC3H7.09	dbr1	erf2	-	mug142	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703337454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774045	2542277	2539564	278746	276125	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC550.12	dbr1	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.2601593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774046	2542277	2540919	278746	277435	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC543.07	dbr1	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.02910254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774047	2542277	2543383	278746	279805	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC869.08	dbr1	pcm2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713070294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774048	2542277	2539797	278746	276347	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC16G5.14c	dbr1	rps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.441799987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774049	2542277	2538833	278746	275414	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCP1E11.11	dbr1	puf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507030084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774050	2542277	2540929	278746	277445	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC354.03	dbr1	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.617111402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774051	2542277	2543048	278746	279483	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC3F10.02c	dbr1	trk1	-	sptrk	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.745317267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774052	2542277	2541346	278746	277857	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBP8B7.08c	dbr1	ppm1	-	SPBP8B7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.686621809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774053	2542277	2540727	278746	277250	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC1921.03c	dbr1	mex67	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.429109058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774054	2542277	2541323	278746	277835	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBP35G2.14	dbr1	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.908459167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774055	2542277	2542969	278746	279409	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC4G8.10	dbr1	gos1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.84629298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774056	2542277	2542220	278746	278694	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC1A6.03c	dbr1	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.635908822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774057	2542277	2539244	278746	275814	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC1672.06c	dbr1	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.805648384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774058	2542277	2538906	278746	275483	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC1259.03	dbr1	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.645371674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774059	2542277	2540825	278746	277343	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC428.08c	dbr1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.537024139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774060	2542277	2541926	278746	278414	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC222.14c	dbr1	SPAC222.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.813321433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774061	2542277	2543573	278746	279988	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC869.11	dbr1	cat1	-	SPAC922.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.190483415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774062	2542277	2542036	278746	278518	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC23A1.19c	dbr1	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.914111267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774063	2542277	2542964	278746	279404	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC12G12.07c	dbr1	SPAC12G12.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.902881718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774064	2542277	2540892	278746	277408	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC530.01	dbr1	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567621742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774065	2542277	2542513	278746	278971	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC1952.05	dbr1	gcn5	-	kat2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.614055387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774066	2542277	2538811	278746	275392	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC330.03c	dbr1	SPCC330.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582010036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774067	2542277	2540546	278746	277073	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC25B2.06c	dbr1	btb2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.44065423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774068	2542277	2539733	278746	276285	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC16E9.12c	dbr1	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.036256181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774069	2542277	2541889	278746	278379	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC2F7.03c	dbr1	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389269417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774070	2542277	2542660	278746	279113	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC328.03	dbr1	tps1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.566225597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774071	2542277	2542227	278746	278700	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC5H10.13c	dbr1	gmh2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.481990566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774072	2542277	2541496	278746	277998	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC23D3.09	dbr1	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.644616142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774073	2542277	2539689	278746	276244	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC1861.03	dbr1	mak10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.504916307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774074	2542277	2539857	278746	276404	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC1604.20c	dbr1	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.478678206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774075	2542277	2543643	278746	280057	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC3G9.07c	dbr1	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.690957932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774076	2542277	2541899	278746	278389	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC22E12.11c	dbr1	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.276100363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774077	2542277	2543250	278746	279678	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC3G9.15c	dbr1	fcf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.057217282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774078	2542277	2539455	278746	276018	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC736.09c	dbr1	SPCC736.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.056807761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774079	2542277	2539667	278746	276222	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC13G1.08c	dbr1	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.984353751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774080	2542277	2542861	278746	279307	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC13G7.13c	dbr1	msa1	-	SPAC6C3.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992073019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774081	2542277	2542126	278746	278602	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC1B3.05	dbr1	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.374728113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774082	2542277	2542419	278746	278882	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC17G6.05c	dbr1	bro1	-	SPAC17G6.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.123301741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774083	2542277	2538880	278746	275459	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC1393.09c	dbr1	SPCC1393.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64800421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774084	2542277	2540741	278746	277264	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC83.05	dbr1	SPBC83.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.118107319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774085	2542277	2541009	278746	277524	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC428.04	dbr1	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.375328107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774086	2542277	2539953	278746	276497	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC1709.11c	dbr1	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.187804673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774087	2542277	2542055	278746	278534	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC6G9.03c	dbr1	mug183	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.079351195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774088	2542277	2539317	278746	275883	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC16A11.08	dbr1	atg20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378620407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774089	2542277	2539847	278746	276395	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC530.14c	dbr1	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.970778844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774090	2542277	2540599	278746	277125	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC29A3.10c	dbr1	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.563456031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774091	2542277	2543517	278746	279935	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC3G9.05	dbr1	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980115516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774092	2542277	2540184	278746	276717	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC106.12c	dbr1	SPBC106.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842774898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774093	2542277	2538690	278746	275275	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC1393.05	dbr1	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.83164655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774094	2542277	2541337	278746	277848	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBP35G2.13c	dbr1	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.980816114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774095	2542277	2540930	278746	277446	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC354.10	dbr1	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.811811673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774096	2542277	2538848	278746	275429	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC613.12c	dbr1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.215108378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774097	2542277	2539706	278746	276259	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC16G5.13	dbr1	ptf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.562176817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774098	2542277	2543113	278746	279545	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC3F10.07c	dbr1	erf4	-	mug91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38075084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774099	2542277	2539354	278746	275920	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC4F11.03c	dbr1	SPCC4F11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.342903669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774100	2542277	2543670	278746	280084	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAPB1E7.06c	dbr1	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321696215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774101	2542277	2541909	278746	278399	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC227.01c	dbr1	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.955791647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774102	2542277	2540498	278746	277026	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC27.02c	dbr1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.323115167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774103	2542277	2542883	278746	279328	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC1486.04c	dbr1	alm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.886254099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774104	2542277	2541121	278746	277636	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC609.03	dbr1	iqw1	-	iqwd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.436784067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774105	2542277	2542385	278746	278849	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC1805.02c	dbr1	etf2	-	SPAC1805.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.548196456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774106	2542277	2538966	278746	275540	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC18.10	dbr1	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.173895628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774107	2542277	2542940	278746	279381	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC31A2.12	dbr1	SPAC31A2.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.911288984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774108	2542277	2541432	278746	277937	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC1F5.05c	dbr1	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.899983392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774109	2542277	2540089	278746	276627	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC32H8.01c	dbr1	SPBC32H8.01c	-	SPBP22H7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.938856925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774110	2542277	2539239	278746	275809	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC1020.10	dbr1	oca2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.55586123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774111	2542277	2542418	278746	278881	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC1805.07c	dbr1	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.867155961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774112	2542277	2540677	278746	277202	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC21B10.03c	dbr1	ath1	-	SPBC21B10.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818104119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774113	2542277	2542826	278746	279273	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC13G6.09	dbr1	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.137183561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774114	2542277	2539668	278746	276223	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC11B10.10c	dbr1	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.283029792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774115	2542277	2539928	278746	276472	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC1604.08c	dbr1	imp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385954799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774116	2542277	2539205	278746	275775	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC4B3.15	dbr1	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.630757075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774117	2542277	2539726	278746	276278	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC13E7.08c	dbr1	leo1	-	SPBC13E7.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.965781664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774118	2542277	2538861	278746	275441	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC1620.11	dbr1	nup97	-	mug87	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.077375869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774119	2542277	2543387	278746	279809	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAPB1E7.02c	dbr1	mcl1	-	slr3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.77181929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774120	2542277	2539014	278746	275587	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC18B5.05c	dbr1	SPCC18B5.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.890998047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774121	2542277	2541320	278746	277832	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC1271.03c	dbr1	SPBC1271.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987329067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774122	2542277	2541124	278746	277639	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC646.02	dbr1	cwf11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.237395175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774123	2542277	2541272	278746	277786	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC947.03c	dbr1	naa38	-	mak31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.384850776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774124	2542277	2542943	278746	279384	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC1348.03	dbr1	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.326497112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774125	2542277	2542094	278746	278571	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC29B12.06c	dbr1	rcd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.714295526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774126	2542277	2540208	278746	276741	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC9B6.03	dbr1	SPBC9B6.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568626707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774127	2542277	2543463	278746	279883	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAPB21F2.03	dbr1	slx9	-	SPAPB21F2.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.731025393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774128	2542277	2540787	278746	277306	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC1921.07c	dbr1	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.181210154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774129	2542277	2540734	278746	277257	SPAC17A5.02c	SPBC19G7.09	dbr1	ulp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323334592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774130	2542277	2539001	278746	275575	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC1494.08c	dbr1	SPCC1494.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.258596135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774131	2543338	2542971	279761	279410	SPAC458.06	SPAC105.02c	atg1803	SPAC105.02c	SPAC458.06|atg18|atg18c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.803767405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774132	2543338	2542453	279761	278914	SPAC458.06	SPAC186.01	atg1803	pfl9	SPAC458.06|atg18|atg18c	SPAC186.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.824192685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774133	2543338	3361389	279761	280465	SPAC458.06	SPAC977.13c	atg1803	SPAC977.13c	SPAC458.06|atg18|atg18c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.91625385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774134	2542096	2543529	278572	279947	SPAC26H5.02c	SPAC4C5.02c	SPAC26H5.02c	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.80942867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774135	2542096	2540930	278572	277446	SPAC26H5.02c	SPBC354.10	SPAC26H5.02c	def1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815013333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774136	2539843	2541512	276391	278013	SPBC16G5.11c	SPAC11E3.08c	bag101	nse6	bag1|bag1-a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.497658648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774137	2539843	2542710	276391	279163	SPBC16G5.11c	SPAC750.08c	bag101	SPAC750.08c	bag1|bag1-a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.052193292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774138	2539843	2540380	276391	276909	SPBC16G5.11c	SPBC1A4.05	bag101	blt1	bag1|bag1-a	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81090836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774139	2539843	2542943	276391	279384	SPBC16G5.11c	SPBC1348.03	bag101	SPBC1348.03	bag1|bag1-a	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38414382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774140	2541358	2541902	277869	278392	SPBP4H10.16c	SPAC27E2.07	SPBP4H10.16c	pvg2	-	mug53	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.146812637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774141	2541358	2542598	277869	279052	SPBP4H10.16c	SPAC6G10.08	SPBP4H10.16c	idp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986572762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774142	2541358	2542701	277869	279154	SPBP4H10.16c	SPAC26H5.05	SPBP4H10.16c	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933099897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774143	2541358	2539564	277869	276125	SPBP4H10.16c	SPCC550.12	SPBP4H10.16c	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.27412625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774144	2541358	2543641	277869	280055	SPBP4H10.16c	SPAC3H5.08c	SPBP4H10.16c	SPAC3H5.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.103375999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774145	2541358	2538906	277869	275483	SPBP4H10.16c	SPCC1259.03	SPBP4H10.16c	rpa12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.304771036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774146	2541358	2543020	277869	279456	SPBP4H10.16c	SPAC10F6.13c	SPBP4H10.16c	SPAC10F6.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983856931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774147	2541358	2542177	277869	278652	SPBP4H10.16c	SPAC17H9.08	SPBP4H10.16c	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462618199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774148	2541358	2543250	277869	279678	SPBP4H10.16c	SPAC3G9.15c	SPBP4H10.16c	fcf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.062994375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774149	2541358	2543244	277869	279672	SPBP4H10.16c	SPAC6B12.06c	SPBP4H10.16c	rrg9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981212282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774150	2541358	2542597	277869	279051	SPBP4H10.16c	SPAP8A3.07c	SPBP4H10.16c	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094388961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774151	2541358	2541927	277869	278415	SPBP4H10.16c	SPAC222.12c	SPBP4H10.16c	atp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982840527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774152	2541358	2541746	277869	278240	SPBP4H10.16c	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBP4H10.16c	hus1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.937394452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774153	2541358	2543628	277869	280042	SPBP4H10.16c	SPAC3H8.10	SPBP4H10.16c	spo20	-	sec14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.10206825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774154	2541358	2541175	277869	277689	SPBP4H10.16c	SPBC839.13c	SPBP4H10.16c	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.123402847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774155	2541358	2540498	277869	277026	SPBP4H10.16c	SPBC27.02c	SPBP4H10.16c	ask1	-	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.082565297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774156	2541358	2543304	277869	279728	SPBP4H10.16c	SPAC6B12.12	SPBP4H10.16c	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.979616148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774157	2541358	2542418	277869	278881	SPBP4H10.16c	SPAC1805.07c	SPBP4H10.16c	dad2	-	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.97445507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774158	2541358	2539205	277869	275775	SPBP4H10.16c	SPCC4B3.15	SPBP4H10.16c	mid1	-	dmf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.927464181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774159	2541358	2539375	277869	275941	SPBP4H10.16c	SPCC4G3.11	SPBP4H10.16c	mug154	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990292476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774160	2541358	2542059	277869	278537	SPBP4H10.16c	SPAC328.06	SPBP4H10.16c	ubp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.671851301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774161	2541358	2542716	277869	279169	SPBP4H10.16c	SPAC25H1.07	SPBP4H10.16c	emc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.979219894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774162	2541358	2540451	277869	276979	SPBP4H10.16c	SPBC2G2.17c	SPBP4H10.16c	SPBC2G2.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781634112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774163	2541358	2542109	277869	278585	SPBP4H10.16c	SPAC1687.16c	SPBP4H10.16c	erg31	-	erg3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387812524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774164	2541358	2543087	277869	279520	SPBP4H10.16c	SPAC30C2.04	SPBP4H10.16c	SPAC30C2.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039942474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774165	2541358	2542440	277869	278902	SPBP4H10.16c	SPAC17A2.12	SPBP4H10.16c	rrp1	-	SPAC17A2.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5625659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774166	2541358	2541875	277869	278365	SPBP4H10.16c	SPAC22F3.06c	SPBP4H10.16c	lon1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452571681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774167	2541358	2542551	277869	279008	SPBP4H10.16c	SPAC1952.17c	SPBP4H10.16c	SPAC1952.17c	-	SPAC890.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0422863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774168	2542180	2542430	278655	278892	SPAC589.07c	SPAC17G6.06	atg1801	rps2401	atg18|atg18a	rps24|rps24-1|rps24a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514275603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774169	2542180	2543617	278655	280031	SPAC589.07c	SPAC4A8.10	atg1801	SPAC4A8.10	atg18|atg18a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.132177348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774170	2542180	2539201	278655	275772	SPAC589.07c	SPCC188.09c	atg1801	pfl4	atg18|atg18a	SPCC188.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809902802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774171	2542180	2542613	278655	279067	SPAC589.07c	SPAC18B11.03c	atg1801	SPAC18B11.03c	atg18|atg18a	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090463893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774172	2542180	2541313	278655	277825	SPAC589.07c	SPBP26C9.02c	atg1801	car1	atg18|atg18a	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.617990696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774173	2542180	2541019	278655	277534	SPAC589.07c	SPBC3B8.07c	atg1801	dsd1	atg18|atg18a	SDCB3B8.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868087193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774174	2542180	2542696	278655	279149	SPAC589.07c	SPAC29B12.03	atg1801	spd1	atg18|atg18a	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98153017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774175	2542180	2539575	278655	276135	SPAC589.07c	SPCP20C8.02c	atg1801	SPCP20C8.02c	atg18|atg18a	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.341998841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774176	2542180	2539937	278655	276481	SPAC589.07c	SPBC1539.08	atg1801	arf6	atg18|atg18a	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.821038786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774177	2542180	2540540	278655	277067	SPAC589.07c	SPBC23E6.10c	atg1801	SPBC23E6.10c	atg18|atg18a	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.404604376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774178	2542180	2539388	278655	275953	SPAC589.07c	SPCC24B10.12	atg1801	cgi121	atg18|atg18a	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.995725729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774179	2542180	2539845	278655	276393	SPAC589.07c	SPBC12C2.02c	atg1801	ste20	atg18|atg18a	ste16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.404201296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774180	2542180	2540150	278655	276687	SPAC589.07c	SPBC16E9.14c	atg1801	zrg17	atg18|atg18a	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812701245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774181	2542180	2542160	278655	278636	SPAC589.07c	SPAC8C9.11	atg1801	fra2	atg18|atg18a	SPAC8C9.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635292673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774182	2542180	2540086	278655	276624	SPAC589.07c	SPBC16H5.12c	atg1801	SPBC16H5.12c	atg18|atg18a	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.508268709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774183	2542180	2542439	278655	278901	SPAC589.07c	SPAC17A5.08	atg1801	erp2	atg18|atg18a	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979603488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774184	2542180	2542597	278655	279051	SPAC589.07c	SPAP8A3.07c	atg1801	SPAP8A3.07c	atg18|atg18a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.76791307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774185	2542180	2540533	278655	277061	SPAC589.07c	SPBC29A10.16c	atg1801	SPBC29A10.16c	atg18|atg18a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642737691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774186	2542180	2539519	278655	276081	SPAC589.07c	SPCC364.05	atg1801	vps3	atg18|atg18a	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809415609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774187	2542180	2538848	278655	275429	SPAC589.07c	SPCC613.12c	atg1801	raf1	atg18|atg18a	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.666731616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774188	2542180	2541896	278655	278386	SPAC589.07c	SPAC23H4.16c	atg1801	SPAC23H4.16c	atg18|atg18a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328467248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774189	2542180	2542306	278655	278773	SPAC589.07c	SPAC29A4.11	atg1801	rga3	atg18|atg18a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32507388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774190	2542180	2539514	278655	276076	SPAC589.07c	SPCC663.14c	atg1801	trp663	atg18|atg18a	SPCC663.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819017842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774191	2542180	2540333	278655	276863	SPAC589.07c	SPBC21B10.07	atg1801	SPBC21B10.07	atg18|atg18a	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048391733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774192	2542180	2539460	278655	276023	SPAC589.07c	SPCC4B3.13	atg1801	SPCC4B3.13	atg18|atg18a	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099854844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774193	2542180	2541050	278655	277565	SPAC589.07c	SPBC428.05c	atg1801	arg12	atg18|atg18a	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.401571918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774194	2542180	2540787	278655	277306	SPAC589.07c	SPBC1921.07c	atg1801	sgf29	atg18|atg18a	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.506217024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774195	2543685	2539050	280099	275623	SPAC3C7.03c	SPCC11E10.08	rad55	rik1	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.687325882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774196	2543685	2540279	280099	276810	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC3B8.04c	rad55	SPBC3B8.04c	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.499448308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774197	2543685	2541562	280099	278061	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC24B11.05	rad55	SPAC24B11.05	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.840375838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774198	2543685	2538961	280099	275535	SPAC3C7.03c	SPCC285.14	rad55	trs130	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.845812008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774199	2543685	2542382	280099	278846	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC6G10.06	rad55	SPAC6G10.06	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.058748456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774200	2543685	2541145	280099	277660	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC651.12c	rad55	dbl7	rhp55	SPBC651.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.125073486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774201	2543685	2543152	280099	279584	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC869.03c	rad55	SPAC869.03c	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.97722893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774202	2543685	2542127	280099	278603	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC1952.12c	rad55	csn71	rhp55	csn7|csn7a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922674702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774203	2543685	2543064	280099	279497	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC3G6.01	rad55	hrp3	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.907586853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774204	2543685	2542643	280099	279097	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC2C4.07c	rad55	dis32	rhp55	SPAC2C4.07c|dis3L2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.206418666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774205	2543685	2540524	280099	277052	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC21B10.08c	rad55	SPBC21B10.08c	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.974700949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774206	2543685	2542378	280099	278842	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC1805.04	rad55	nup132	rhp55	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.414899931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774207	2543685	2540863	280099	277380	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC56F2.03	rad55	SPBC56F2.03	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.192652404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774208	2543685	2542237	280099	278709	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC19E9.02	rad55	fin1	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.665759926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774209	2543685	2542224	280099	278697	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC19G12.03	rad55	cda1	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699943292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774210	2543685	2541051	280099	277566	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC3E7.08c	rad55	rad13	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.651544072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774211	2543685	2541633	280099	278129	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC664.01c	rad55	swi6	rhp55	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574075992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774212	2543685	2539944	280099	276488	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC1198.06c	rad55	SPBC1198.06c	rhp55	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812464517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774213	2543685	2541374	280099	277885	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBPB10D8.06c	rad55	SPBPB10D8.06c	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.09142646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774214	2543685	2543164	280099	279595	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC3G6.06c	rad55	rad2	rhp55	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.41754103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774215	2543685	2542071	280099	278548	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC26H5.03	rad55	pcf2	rhp55	cac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.496678489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774216	2543685	2542103	280099	278579	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC31G5.11	rad55	pac2	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577689348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774217	2543685	2540455	280099	276983	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC215.05	rad55	gpd1	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.260315386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774218	2543685	2541286	280099	277799	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC9B6.11c	rad55	SPBC9B6.11c	rhp55	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809902802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774219	2543685	2539210	280099	275780	SPAC3C7.03c	SPCC2H8.05c	rad55	dbl1	rhp55	SPCC2H8.05c|SPCC63.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.31531888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774220	2543685	3361570	280099	280646	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC750.01	rad55	SPAC750.01	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.827826887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774221	2543685	2540975	280099	277491	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC354.12	rad55	gpd3	rhp55	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.83779375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774222	2543685	2539420	280099	275985	SPAC3C7.03c	SPCC970.07c	rad55	raf2	rhp55	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.35592543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774223	2543685	2540560	280099	277087	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC2D10.14c	rad55	myo51	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780205149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774224	2543685	2541208	280099	277722	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC887.04c	rad55	lub1	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.435607021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774225	2543685	2539913	280099	276457	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC11G11.03	rad55	mrt4	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.370562509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774226	2543685	2538801	280099	275382	SPAC3C7.03c	SPCC285.13c	rad55	nup60	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.062384809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774227	2543685	2542689	280099	279142	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC29B12.04	rad55	snz1	rhp55	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196325505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774228	2543685	2540929	280099	277445	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC354.03	rad55	swd3	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.743220252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774229	2543685	2541045	280099	277560	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC543.03c	rad55	pku80	rhp55	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927213621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774230	2543685	2542022	280099	278505	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC23A1.03	rad55	apt1	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.782746371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774231	2543685	2542318	280099	278784	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC16C9.05	rad55	cph1	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.182541228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774232	2543685	2540595	280099	277121	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC21C3.02c	rad55	dep1	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.503587376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774233	2543685	2541643	280099	278139	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC14C4.13	rad55	rad17	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.26420419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774234	2543685	2541580	280099	278077	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC1687.05	rad55	pli1	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.735575141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774235	2543685	2539129	280099	275701	SPAC3C7.03c	SPCC338.14	rad55	ado1	rhp55	SPCC338.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571909325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774236	2543685	2543641	280099	280055	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC3H5.08c	rad55	SPAC3H5.08c	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.265445127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774237	2543685	2539352	280099	275918	SPAC3C7.03c	SPCC188.07	rad55	ccq1	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.90847681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774238	2543685	2538906	280099	275483	SPAC3C7.03c	SPCC1259.03	rad55	rpa12	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580015833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774239	2543685	2539478	280099	276041	SPAC3C7.03c	SPCC550.07	rad55	SPCC550.07	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.173143788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774240	2543685	2540825	280099	277343	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC428.08c	rad55	clr4	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.52677347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774241	2543685	2542558	280099	279014	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC1952.07	rad55	rad1	rhp55	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.543475982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774242	2543685	2541021	280099	277536	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC3B8.10c	rad55	nem1	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.916400978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774243	2543685	3361391	280099	280467	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC13G6.01c	rad55	rad8	rhp55	SPAC5H10.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.03165466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774244	2543685	2542554	280099	279011	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC1952.03	rad55	otu2	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.763095701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774245	2543685	2541544	280099	278044	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC22G7.06c	rad55	ura1	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.497279658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774246	2543685	2542036	280099	278518	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC23A1.19c	rad55	hrq1	rhp55	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.963491339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774247	2543685	2539098	280099	275670	SPAC3C7.03c	SPCC24B10.18	rad55	SPCC24B10.18	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383079598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774248	2543685	2539467	280099	276030	SPAC3C7.03c	SPCC417.07c	rad55	mto1	rhp55	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.767702453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774249	2543685	2539388	280099	275953	SPAC3C7.03c	SPCC24B10.12	rad55	cgi121	rhp55	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.507596977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774250	2543685	2542950	280099	279390	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC12B10.03	rad55	bun62	rhp55	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.197354811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774251	2543685	2542596	280099	279050	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC1B3.17	rad55	clr2	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.561242588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774252	2543685	2542707	280099	279160	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC25G10.03	rad55	zip1	rhp55	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.102969783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774253	2543685	2540429	280099	276957	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC29A10.07	rad55	pom152	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382282171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774254	2543685	2539990	280099	276534	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC1289.14	rad55	SPBC1289.14	rhp55	SPBC8E4.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978723196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774255	2543685	2541543	280099	278043	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC5H10.04	rad55	SPAC5H10.04	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.335912289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774256	2543685	2540396	280099	276924	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC31F10.12	rad55	tma20	rhp55	SPBC31F10.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.840078127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774257	2543685	2541192	280099	277706	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC83.17	rad55	SPBC83.17	rhp55	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877233814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774258	2543685	2543510	280099	279928	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC30D11.07	rad55	nth1	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.163003591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774259	2543685	2539484	280099	276047	SPAC3C7.03c	SPCC594.04c	rad55	SPCC594.04c	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.261381004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774260	2543685	2539999	280099	276543	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC1734.15	rad55	rsc4	rhp55	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383919974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774261	2543685	2541496	280099	277998	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC23D3.09	rad55	arp42	rhp55	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.803734081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774262	2543685	2542925	280099	279366	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC11E3.04c	rad55	ubc13	rhp55	spu13|sst5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.079321747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774263	2543685	2543358	280099	279780	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC688.10	rad55	rev3	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.711793703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774264	2543685	2538994	280099	275568	SPAC3C7.03c	SPCC553.01c	rad55	dbl2	rhp55	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.402217566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774265	2543685	2538852	280099	275433	SPAC3C7.03c	SPCC4E9.01c	rad55	rec11	rhp55	SPCC550.16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.265369804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774266	2543685	2540538	280099	277065	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC26H8.03	rad55	cho2	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701504348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774267	2543685	2541704	280099	278199	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC1250.04c	rad55	atl1	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.395609841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774268	2543685	2540261	280099	276792	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC543.05c	rad55	SPBC543.05c	rhp55	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927089983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774269	2543685	2542946	280099	279386	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC6F12.03c	rad55	fsv1	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.402917421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774270	2543685	2542976	280099	279414	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC9E9.09c	rad55	atd1	rhp55	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.866976407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774271	2543685	2538880	280099	275459	SPAC3C7.03c	SPCC1393.09c	rad55	SPCC1393.09c	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.066468385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774272	2543685	2540107	280099	276644	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC106.08c	rad55	mug2	rhp55	B13958-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.192958143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774273	2543685	2540374	280099	276903	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC31F10.02	rad55	SPBC31F10.02	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.337169399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774274	2543685	2542056	280099	278535	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC6G9.14	rad55	SPAC6G9.14	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.385496404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774275	2543685	2539715	280099	276268	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC1778.09	rad55	SPBC1778.09	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.316971572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774276	2543685	2540378	280099	276907	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC30D10.18c	rad55	rpl102	rhp55	rpl1-2|rpl10a-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770799628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774277	2543685	2541536	280099	278036	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC1071.02	rad55	mms19	rhp55	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816462786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774278	2543685	2539043	280099	275616	SPAC3C7.03c	SPCC1235.08c	rad55	pdh1	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.152621298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774279	2543685	2541296	280099	277808	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBP8B7.06	rad55	rpp201	rhp55	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.560026102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774280	2543685	2541565	280099	278063	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC1250.03	rad55	ubc14	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.995309696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774281	2543685	2541746	280099	278240	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC20G4.04c	rad55	hus1	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.54595222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774282	2543685	2539812	280099	276362	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC1347.02	rad55	fkbp39	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.011305529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774283	2543685	2540193	280099	276726	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC1289.10c	rad55	adn2	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317350661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774284	2543685	2540930	280099	277446	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC354.10	rad55	def1	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.934068999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774285	2543685	2538848	280099	275429	SPAC3C7.03c	SPCC613.12c	rad55	raf1	rhp55	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.801321262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774286	2543685	2540821	280099	277339	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC800.03	rad55	clr3	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.190569757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774287	2543685	2539932	280099	276476	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC13E7.07	rad55	SPBC13E7.07	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643160516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774288	2543685	2542198	280099	278673	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC6F12.09	rad55	rdp1	rhp55	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.566527358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774289	2543685	2539686	280099	276241	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC1734.06	rad55	rhp18	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.624576961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774290	2543685	2541156	280099	277671	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC685.07c	rad55	rpl2701	rhp55	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.192168295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774291	2543685	2539101	280099	275673	SPAC3C7.03c	SPCC736.04c	rad55	gma12	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.588411628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774292	2543685	2542327	280099	278793	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC16C9.06c	rad55	upf1	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319727881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774293	2543685	2540619	280099	277145	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC25H2.15	rad55	SPBC25H2.15	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.389071506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774294	2543685	2540814	280099	277333	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC4B4.10c	rad55	atg5	rhp55	mug77	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576486793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774295	2543685	2540464	280099	276992	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC23E6.02	rad55	rrp2	rhp55	SPBC23E6.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573251167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774296	2543685	2540115	280099	276652	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC1778.02	rad55	rap1	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.819588954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774297	2543685	2542458	280099	278919	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC30.02c	rad55	SPAC30.02c	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.289340455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774298	2543685	2541367	280099	277878	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBP8B7.13	rad55	vac7	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.806956382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774299	2543685	2541470	280099	277972	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAPYUG7.04c	rad55	rpb9	rhp55	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.510537281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774300	2543685	2541678	280099	278174	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAP7G5.05	rad55	rpl1002	rhp55	rpl10|rpl10-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05665066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774301	2543685	2540699	280099	277223	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC800.08	rad55	gcd10	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.138317722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774302	2543685	2540829	280099	277347	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC800.09	rad55	sum2	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441401481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774303	2543685	2542418	280099	278881	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC1805.07c	rad55	dad2	rhp55	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.385976989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774304	2543685	2540677	280099	277202	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC21B10.03c	rad55	ath1	rhp55	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.686536654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774305	2543685	2540928	280099	277444	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC3E7.10	rad55	fma1	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.419733281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774306	2543685	2540992	280099	277508	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC342.05	rad55	crb2	rhp55	rhp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.18120536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774307	2543685	2540568	280099	277095	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC28F2.08c	rad55	SPBC28F2.08c	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.264953778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774308	2543685	2540927	280099	277443	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC365.06	rad55	pmt3	rhp55	smt3|ubl2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.491282351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774309	2543685	2540936	280099	277452	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC800.05c	rad55	atb2	rhp55	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.881370145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774310	2543685	2540432	280099	276960	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC25H2.05	rad55	egd2	rhp55	nac1|ucp15	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322108829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774311	2543685	2539545	280099	276106	SPAC3C7.03c	SPCC4B3.12	rad55	set9	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.661437487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774312	2543685	2540140	280099	276677	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC16C6.08c	rad55	qcr6	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513764145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774313	2543685	2539375	280099	275941	SPAC3C7.03c	SPCC4G3.11	rad55	mug154	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.83276117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774314	2543685	2540146	280099	276683	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC17A3.06	rad55	SPBC17A3.06	rhp55	pi040	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.88892923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774315	2543685	2543337	280099	279760	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC959.08	rad55	rpl2102	rhp55	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317515473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774316	2543685	2542059	280099	278537	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC328.06	rad55	ubp2	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.339055419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774317	2543685	2543384	280099	279806	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC637.06	rad55	gmh5	rhp55	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.202371248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774318	2543685	2541806	280099	278297	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC4G8.13c	rad55	prz1	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.533316688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774319	2543685	2543387	280099	279809	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAPB1E7.02c	rad55	mcl1	rhp55	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505156948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774320	2543685	2542159	280099	278635	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC1834.09	rad55	mug51	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.094884802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774321	2543685	2540360	280099	276889	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC2G5.01	rad55	SPBC2G5.01	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.753743368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774322	2543685	2540481	280099	277009	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC2D10.12	rad55	rhp23	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.08239329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774323	2543685	2538869	280099	275449	SPAC3C7.03c	SPCC777.02	rad55	SPCC777.02	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.384197868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774324	2543685	2539588	280099	276146	SPAC3C7.03c	SPCC962.04	rad55	rps1201	rhp55	rps12|rps12-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.005428545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774325	2543685	3361295	280099	280371	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC1921.01c	rad55	rpl35b	rhp55	rpl37|rpl37-1|rpl3701|SPBC29C10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.479761652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774326	2543685	2542094	280099	278571	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC29B12.06c	rad55	rcd1	rhp55	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572446928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774327	2543685	2540649	280099	277174	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC19F8.08	rad55	rps401	rhp55	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.725406972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774328	2541100	2540913	277615	277429	SPBC651.04	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC651.04	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.179938593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774329	2541100	2543064	277615	279497	SPBC651.04	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC651.04	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.976840404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774330	2541100	2543575	277615	279990	SPBC651.04	SPAC644.13c	SPBC651.04	SPAC644.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769911268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774331	2541100	2542358	277615	278823	SPBC651.04	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC651.04	clp1	-	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.26945926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774332	2541100	2542293	277615	278761	SPBC651.04	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC651.04	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.956962982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774333	2541100	2540161	277615	276696	SPBC651.04	SPBC13E7.03c	SPBC651.04	SPBC13E7.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.338060808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774334	2541100	2538922	277615	275499	SPBC651.04	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC651.04	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639478018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774335	2541100	2542318	277615	278784	SPBC651.04	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC651.04	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.063320691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774336	2541100	2541249	277615	277763	SPBC651.04	SPBC947.01	SPBC651.04	alf1	-	SPBC947.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.000689465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774337	2541100	2542513	277615	278971	SPBC651.04	SPAC1952.05	SPBC651.04	gcn5	-	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634518893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774338	2541100	2540352	277615	276881	SPBC651.04	SPBC215.03c	SPBC651.04	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.395255615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774339	2541100	2541496	277615	277998	SPBC651.04	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC651.04	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.371209087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774340	2541100	2542193	277615	278668	SPBC651.04	SPAC9G1.11c	SPBC651.04	spn4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.053651547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774341	2541100	2541900	277615	278390	SPBC651.04	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC651.04	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.310548339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774342	2541100	2542549	277615	279006	SPBC651.04	SPAC19A8.11c	SPBC651.04	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.811965707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774343	2541100	2540019	277615	276563	SPBC651.04	SPBC1685.01	SPBC651.04	pmp1	-	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.663687166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774344	2541100	2543517	277615	279935	SPBC651.04	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC651.04	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.774544383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774345	2541100	2538762	277615	275345	SPBC651.04	SPCC306.04c	SPBC651.04	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.199019672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774346	2541100	2543619	277615	280033	SPBC651.04	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC651.04	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.455786163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774347	2541100	2542418	277615	278881	SPBC651.04	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC651.04	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.623302606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774348	2541100	2543516	277615	279934	SPBC651.04	SPAC4F10.11	SPBC651.04	spn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.644172478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774349	2541100	2543327	277615	279750	SPBC651.04	SPAC1D4.06c	SPBC651.04	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570369264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774350	2541100	2540787	277615	277306	SPBC651.04	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC651.04	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.730020217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774351	2541220	2539226	277734	275796	SPBC8D2.04	SPCC16C4.20c	hht2	SPCC16C4.20c	h3.2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.258283494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774352	2541220	2543563	277734	279979	SPBC8D2.04	SPAC664.02c	hht2	arp8	h3.2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.350785388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774353	2541220	2542036	277734	278518	SPBC8D2.04	SPAC23A1.19c	hht2	hrq1	h3.2	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.125461124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774354	2541220	2539804	277734	276354	SPBC8D2.04	SPBC1105.11c	hht2	hht3	h3.2	h3.3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.197735521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774355	2541220	2540831	277734	277349	SPBC8D2.04	SPBC428.02c	hht2	eca39	h3.2	SPBC582.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641600628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774356	2541220	2540519	277734	277047	SPBC8D2.04	SPBC21C3.14c	hht2	SPBC21C3.14c	h3.2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517825525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774357	2541220	2538730	277734	275314	SPBC8D2.04	SPCC31H12.02c	hht2	mug73	h3.2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.61936551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774358	2539441	2540161	276004	276696	SPCPJ732.02c	SPBC13E7.03c	xks1	SPBC13E7.03c	SPCPJ732.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808695008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774359	2539441	2543078	276004	279511	SPCPJ732.02c	SPAC31A2.15c	xks1	dcc1	SPCPJ732.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.082567028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774360	2539441	2540893	276004	277409	SPCPJ732.02c	SPBC543.10	xks1	get1	SPCPJ732.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.62694906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774361	2539441	2541801	276004	278292	SPCPJ732.02c	SPAC2F7.08c	xks1	snf5	SPCPJ732.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.131613003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774362	2539441	2542513	276004	278971	SPCPJ732.02c	SPAC1952.05	xks1	gcn5	SPCPJ732.02c	kat2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.938947204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774363	2539441	2543593	276004	280008	SPCPJ732.02c	SPAC4G9.10	xks1	arg3	SPCPJ732.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815454516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774364	2539441	2542254	276004	278724	SPCPJ732.02c	SPAC30D11.04c	xks1	nup124	SPCPJ732.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926403322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774365	2539441	2541614	276004	278111	SPCPJ732.02c	SPAC29A4.20	xks1	elp3	SPCPJ732.02c	kat9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.259749086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774366	2539441	2543304	276004	279728	SPCPJ732.02c	SPAC6B12.12	xks1	tom70	SPCPJ732.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.073492054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774367	2539441	2541531	276004	278031	SPCPJ732.02c	SPAC25A8.01c	xks1	fft3	SPCPJ732.02c	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.247011369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774368	2539441	2541806	276004	278297	SPCPJ732.02c	SPAC4G8.13c	xks1	prz1	SPCPJ732.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.891175669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774369	2539441	2540787	276004	277306	SPCPJ732.02c	SPBC1921.07c	xks1	sgf29	SPCPJ732.02c	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199055282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774370	2540952	2541902	277468	278392	SPBC354.09c	SPAC27E2.07	SPBC354.09c	pvg2	-	mug53	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091866487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774371	2540952	2543529	277468	279947	SPBC354.09c	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC354.09c	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.412562116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774372	2540952	2540068	277468	276606	SPBC354.09c	SPBC1734.12c	SPBC354.09c	alg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439853992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774373	2540952	2540595	277468	277121	SPBC354.09c	SPBC21C3.02c	SPBC354.09c	dep1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877754209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774374	2540952	2539845	277468	276393	SPBC354.09c	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC354.09c	ste20	-	ste16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.146070071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774375	2540952	2541545	277468	278045	SPBC354.09c	SPAC22F8.07c	SPBC354.09c	rtf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.610249079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774376	2540952	2540326	277468	276856	SPBC354.09c	SPBC2G5.06c	SPBC354.09c	hmt2	-	cad1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.97583194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774377	2540952	2539667	277468	276222	SPBC354.09c	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC354.09c	ash2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093171678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774378	2540952	2542519	277468	278977	SPBC354.09c	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC354.09c	scs7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870959704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774379	2540952	2542716	277468	279169	SPBC354.09c	SPAC25H1.07	SPBC354.09c	emc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932179153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774380	2540952	2543400	277468	279822	SPBC354.09c	SPAC3G9.11c	SPBC354.09c	SPAC3G9.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331005066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774381	2540952	2543327	277468	279750	SPBC354.09c	SPAC1D4.06c	SPBC354.09c	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.777208405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774382	2540952	2543472	277468	279892	SPBC354.09c	SPAC959.04c	SPBC354.09c	omh6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.41207335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774383	2540952	2541062	277468	277577	SPBC354.09c	SPBC660.11	SPBC354.09c	tcg1	-	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.566832402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774384	2540952	2539001	277468	275575	SPBC354.09c	SPCC1494.08c	SPBC354.09c	SPCC1494.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049696762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774385	2541686	2540220	278182	276753	SPAC29E6.02	SPBC337.03	prp3	rhn1	SPAC30.06	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.921888124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774386	2541686	2539974	278182	276518	SPAC29E6.02	SPBC32H8.07	prp3	git5	SPAC30.06	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.975587779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774387	2541686	2540533	278182	277061	SPAC29E6.02	SPBC29A10.16c	prp3	SPBC29A10.16c	SPAC30.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.820734357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774388	2541686	3361389	278182	280465	SPAC29E6.02	SPAC977.13c	prp3	SPAC977.13c	SPAC30.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.117498689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774389	2543471	2542207	279891	278682	SPAC513.07	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC513.07	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706947428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774390	2543471	2539050	279891	275623	SPAC513.07	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC513.07	rik1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.937560265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774391	2543471	2540279	279891	276810	SPAC513.07	SPBC3B8.04c	SPAC513.07	SPBC3B8.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.679454447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774392	2543471	2540060	279891	276598	SPAC513.07	SPBC106.01	SPAC513.07	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.212905699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774393	2543471	2541650	279891	278146	SPAC513.07	SPAC14C4.12c	SPAC513.07	laf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.491642075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774394	2543471	2541205	279891	277719	SPAC513.07	SPBC839.02	SPAC513.07	SPBC839.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326940422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774395	2543471	2542273	279891	278742	SPAC513.07	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC513.07	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.352585675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774396	2543471	2539510	279891	276072	SPAC513.07	SPCC4G3.04c	SPAC513.07	coq5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773866184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774397	2543471	2542816	279891	279263	SPAC513.07	SPAC4G8.11c	SPAC513.07	atp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.056741381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774398	2543471	2538801	279891	275382	SPAC513.07	SPCC285.13c	SPAC513.07	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.208492314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774399	2543471	2539937	279891	276481	SPAC513.07	SPBC1539.08	SPAC513.07	arf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.74264082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774400	2543471	2542135	279891	278611	SPAC513.07	SPAC13A11.04c	SPAC513.07	ubp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569530868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774401	2543471	2538906	279891	275483	SPAC513.07	SPCC1259.03	SPAC513.07	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.588407829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774402	2543471	2542268	279891	278737	SPAC513.07	SPAC17A5.07c	SPAC513.07	ulp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.45819256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774403	2543471	2539898	279891	276444	SPAC513.07	SPBC12D12.07c	SPAC513.07	trx2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.332021464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774404	2543471	2543283	279891	279709	SPAC513.07	SPAC6C3.04	SPAC513.07	cit1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.204595949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774405	2543471	2541496	279891	277998	SPAC513.07	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC513.07	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.308756983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774406	2543471	2541296	279891	277808	SPAC513.07	SPBP8B7.06	SPAC513.07	rpp201	-	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.458334832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774407	2543471	2541793	279891	278284	SPAC513.07	SPAC22H10.02	SPAC513.07	SPAC22H10.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326953517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774408	2543471	2543567	279891	279983	SPAC513.07	SPAC890.03	SPAC513.07	ppk16	-	mug92	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.129027653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774409	2543471	2543662	279891	280076	SPAC513.07	SPAC9.07c	SPAC513.07	SPAC9.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.655613905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774410	2543471	2540699	279891	277223	SPAC513.07	SPBC800.08	SPAC513.07	gcd10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.003097165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774411	2543471	2543124	279891	279556	SPAC513.07	SPAC3A11.06	SPAC513.07	mvp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44218121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774412	2543471	2543237	279891	279665	SPAC513.07	SPAC6B12.02c	SPAC513.07	mus7	-	mms22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447926861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774413	2543471	2540320	279891	276850	SPAC513.07	SPBC3D6.04c	SPAC513.07	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775961848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774414	2543471	2542879	279891	279324	SPAC513.07	SPAC13G7.07	SPAC513.07	arb2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387296547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774415	2542398	2542577	278862	279033	SPAC1805.03c	SPAC19G12.15c	trm13	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642250697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774416	2542398	2542585	278862	279040	SPAC1805.03c	SPAC31A2.13c	trm13	sft1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324887758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774417	2542398	2538993	278862	275567	SPAC1805.03c	SPCC162.12	trm13	tco89	-	SPCC1753.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.130686053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774418	2542398	3361436	278862	280512	SPAC1805.03c	SPAC1296.01c	trm13	SPAC1296.01c	-	SPAC22F3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507686025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774419	2542398	2540251	278862	276783	SPAC1805.03c	SPBC336.05c	trm13	SPBC336.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.399347481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774420	2542398	2542696	278862	279149	SPAC1805.03c	SPAC29B12.03	trm13	spd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.034149516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774421	2542398	2542318	278862	278784	SPAC1805.03c	SPAC16C9.05	trm13	cph1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.615498043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774422	2542398	2543641	278862	280055	SPAC1805.03c	SPAC3H5.08c	trm13	SPAC3H5.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576826672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774423	2542398	2542530	278862	278988	SPAC1805.03c	SPAC1399.02	trm13	SPAC1399.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440282684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774424	2542398	2542253	278862	278723	SPAC1805.03c	SPAC17H9.04c	trm13	SPAC17H9.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453702567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774425	2542398	2542268	278862	278737	SPAC1805.03c	SPAC17A5.07c	trm13	ulp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.688947217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774426	2542398	2542177	278862	278652	SPAC1805.03c	SPAC17H9.08	trm13	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.115691437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774427	2542398	2541943	278862	278430	SPAC1805.03c	SPAC222.07c	trm13	hri2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.02664248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774428	2542398	2542235	278862	278707	SPAC1805.03c	SPAC18G6.05c	trm13	SPAC18G6.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386818379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774429	2542398	2540326	278862	276856	SPAC1805.03c	SPBC2G5.06c	trm13	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.481335838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774430	2542398	2539974	278862	276518	SPAC1805.03c	SPBC32H8.07	trm13	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.98600841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774431	2542398	2540394	278862	276922	SPAC1805.03c	SPBC2D10.09	trm13	snr1	-	SPBC2D10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873995578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774432	2542398	2542439	278862	278901	SPAC1805.03c	SPAC17A5.08	trm13	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569257885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774433	2542398	2541488	278862	277990	SPAC1805.03c	SPAC227.17c	trm13	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.847616369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774434	2542398	3361520	278862	280596	SPAC1805.03c	SPAC1610.02c	trm13	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099741226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774435	2542398	2542881	278862	279326	SPAC1805.03c	SPAC13F5.03c	trm13	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448780551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774436	2542398	2541789	278862	278281	SPAC1805.03c	SPAC23H4.08	trm13	iwr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.3879971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774437	2542398	2541941	278862	278428	SPAC1805.03c	SPAC20H4.03c	trm13	tfs1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.360704267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774438	2542398	2542119	278862	278595	SPAC1805.03c	SPAC1834.08	trm13	mak1	-	phk3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.399671242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774439	2542398	2543372	278862	279794	SPAC1805.03c	SPAPB1A10.09	trm13	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.776767377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774440	2539645	2540131	276200	276668	SPBC146.07	SPBC1778.05c	prp2	SPBC1778.05c	mis11|ods1|uaf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.247887656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774441	2539645	2539845	276200	276393	SPBC146.07	SPBC12C2.02c	prp2	ste20	mis11|ods1|uaf1	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.812298915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774442	2539645	2541488	276200	277990	SPBC146.07	SPAC227.17c	prp2	SPAC227.17c	mis11|ods1|uaf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.175234188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774443	2539215	2542207	275785	278682	SPCC285.16c	SPAC17H9.10c	msh6	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.075239108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774444	2539215	2539050	275785	275623	SPCC285.16c	SPCC11E10.08	msh6	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634391415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774445	2539215	2541633	275785	278129	SPCC285.16c	SPAC664.01c	msh6	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63171358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774446	2539215	2539420	275785	275985	SPCC285.16c	SPCC970.07c	msh6	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.429340578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774447	2539215	2541013	275785	277528	SPCC285.16c	SPBC3H7.13	msh6	far10	-	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.602985776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774448	2539215	2540825	275785	277343	SPCC285.16c	SPBC428.08c	msh6	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.468090028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774449	2539215	2542177	275785	278652	SPCC285.16c	SPAC17H9.08	msh6	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.20567357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774450	2539215	2539603	275785	276161	SPCC285.16c	SPBC1289.06c	msh6	ppr8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039942474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774451	2539215	2541900	275785	278390	SPCC285.16c	SPAC23H4.17c	msh6	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194658456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774452	2539215	2538848	275785	275429	SPCC285.16c	SPCC613.12c	msh6	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.306329066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774453	2539215	2541156	275785	277671	SPCC285.16c	SPBC685.07c	msh6	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.136365473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774454	2539239	2540653	275809	277178	SPCC1020.10	SPBC215.07c	oca2	SPBC215.07c	-	pdp2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.259695635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774455	2539239	2540999	275809	277515	SPCC1020.10	SPBC4B4.04	oca2	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.893498969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774456	2539239	2542277	275809	278746	SPCC1020.10	SPAC17A5.02c	oca2	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.55586123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774457	2539239	2540893	275809	277409	SPCC1020.10	SPBC543.10	oca2	get1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572557221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774458	2539239	2541801	275809	278292	SPCC1020.10	SPAC2F7.08c	oca2	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.694897126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774459	2539239	2540396	275809	276924	SPCC1020.10	SPBC31F10.12	oca2	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.938967319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774460	2539239	2542469	275809	278930	SPCC1020.10	SPAC19A8.04	oca2	erg5	-	cyp61	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.015772747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774461	2539239	2543396	275809	279818	SPCC1020.10	SPAC4D7.11	oca2	dsc4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852865385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774462	2539239	2539527	275809	276089	SPCC1020.10	SPCC338.16	oca2	pof3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.772745783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774463	2539239	2543275	275809	279703	SPCC1020.10	SPAC1002.05c	oca2	jmj2	-	kdm5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.713195161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774464	2539239	2543619	275809	280033	SPCC1020.10	SPAC4F10.04	oca2	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.343020689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774465	2539239	2540555	275809	277082	SPCC1020.10	SPBP16F5.02	oca2	mcs2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707040563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774466	2539239	2539460	275809	276023	SPCC1020.10	SPCC4B3.13	oca2	SPCC4B3.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320094251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774467	2539239	2539178	275809	275749	SPCC1020.10	SPCC1682.14	oca2	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325115098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774468	2542189	2543291	278664	279716	SPAC17A5.09c	SPAC9E9.04	glc9	SPAC9E9.04	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.053738772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774469	2542189	2540653	278664	277178	SPAC17A5.09c	SPBC215.07c	glc9	SPBC215.07c	SPAC17A5.09c	pdp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.502600487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774470	2542189	2539930	278664	276474	SPAC17A5.09c	SPBC1198.11c	glc9	reb1	SPAC17A5.09c	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317838486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774471	2542189	2541117	278664	277632	SPAC17A5.09c	SPBC646.13	glc9	sds23	SPAC17A5.09c	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708294524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774472	2542189	2542963	278664	279403	SPAC17A5.09c	SPAC1071.03c	glc9	sil1	SPAC17A5.09c	SPAC1071.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576445792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774473	2542189	2538806	278664	275387	SPAC17A5.09c	SPCC1840.09	glc9	SPCC1840.09	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.160231374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774474	2542189	2539226	278664	275796	SPAC17A5.09c	SPCC16C4.20c	glc9	SPCC16C4.20c	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933879355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774475	2542189	2541208	278664	277722	SPAC17A5.09c	SPBC887.04c	glc9	lub1	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.789689257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774476	2542189	2539606	278664	276164	SPAC17A5.09c	SPBC15D4.05	glc9	SPBC15D4.05	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444389723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774477	2542189	2541026	278664	277541	SPAC17A5.09c	SPBC337.09	glc9	erg28	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.965741934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774478	2542189	2538825	278664	275406	SPAC17A5.09c	SPCC757.12	glc9	SPCC757.12	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379740447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774479	2542189	2539244	278664	275814	SPAC17A5.09c	SPCC1672.06c	glc9	asp1	SPAC17A5.09c	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578251055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774480	2542189	2538906	278664	275483	SPAC17A5.09c	SPCC1259.03	glc9	rpa12	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039598132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774481	2542189	2539237	278664	275807	SPAC17A5.09c	SPCC24B10.13	glc9	skb5	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.313829391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774482	2542189	2540797	278664	277316	SPAC17A5.09c	SPBC18H10.11c	glc9	ppr2	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.465264276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774483	2542189	2538789	278664	275370	SPAC17A5.09c	SPCC338.04	glc9	cid2	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812744956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774484	2542189	2543412	278664	279834	SPAC17A5.09c	SPAC637.07	glc9	moe1	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.41331094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774485	2542189	2539898	278664	276444	SPAC17A5.09c	SPBC12D12.07c	glc9	trx2	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.918366647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774486	2542189	2541911	278664	278401	SPAC17A5.09c	SPAC212.04c	glc9	SPAC212.04c	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577638457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774487	2542189	2540751	278664	277273	SPAC17A5.09c	SPBC20F10.10	glc9	psl1	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.265879457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774488	2542189	2538723	278664	275307	SPAC17A5.09c	SPCC31H12.06	glc9	mug111	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.072709069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774489	2542189	2543301	278664	279726	SPAC17A5.09c	SPAC977.17	glc9	SPAC977.17	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330979583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774490	2542189	2541053	278664	277568	SPAC17A5.09c	SPBC56F2.10c	glc9	alg5	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872206549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774491	2542189	2540599	278664	277125	SPAC17A5.09c	SPBC29A3.10c	glc9	atp14	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567100635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774492	2542189	2539427	278664	275992	SPAC17A5.09c	SPCC663.15c	glc9	SPCC663.15c	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700103116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774493	2542189	2540882	278664	277399	SPAC17A5.09c	SPBC4F6.08c	glc9	mrpl39	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.375067507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774494	2542189	2540691	278664	277216	SPAC17A5.09c	SPBC20F10.05	glc9	nrl1	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381951846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774495	2542189	2542625	278664	279079	SPAC17A5.09c	SPAC24H6.11c	glc9	SPAC24H6.11c	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.624782198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774496	2542189	2543419	278664	279841	SPAC17A5.09c	SPAPB24D3.02c	glc9	SPAPB24D3.02c	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381306443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774497	2542189	2541425	278664	277930	SPAC17A5.09c	SPAC2C4.17c	glc9	msy2	SPAC17A5.09c	SPAC2C4.17c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381055229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774498	2542189	2538756	278664	275339	SPAC17A5.09c	SPCC1795.10c	glc9	SPCC1795.10c	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317193564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774499	2542189	2539029	278664	275602	SPAC17A5.09c	SPCC61.05	glc9	SPCC61.05	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038428963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774500	2542189	2542418	278664	278881	SPAC17A5.09c	SPAC1805.07c	glc9	dad2	SPAC17A5.09c	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.096131268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774501	2542189	2541860	278664	278350	SPAC17A5.09c	SPAC22F3.02	glc9	atf31	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809020391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774502	2542189	2539207	278664	275777	SPAC17A5.09c	SPCC285.09c	glc9	cgs2	SPAC17A5.09c	pde1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512124351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774503	2542189	2542386	278664	278850	SPAC17A5.09c	SPAC1805.01c	glc9	ppk6	SPAC17A5.09c	SPAPJ736.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383283937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774504	2542189	2538792	278664	275373	SPAC17A5.09c	SPCP1E11.10	glc9	SPCP1E11.10	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039610294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774505	2542189	2541806	278664	278297	SPAC17A5.09c	SPAC4G8.13c	glc9	prz1	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.314869226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774506	2542189	2541778	278664	278271	SPAC17A5.09c	SPAC23G3.05c	glc9	SPAC23G3.05c	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381934552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774507	2542189	2542175	278664	278650	SPAC17A5.09c	SPAC1F3.02c	glc9	mkh1	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.191982037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774508	2542189	2540314	278664	276844	SPAC17A5.09c	SPBC2G5.03	glc9	ctu1	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812294207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774509	2542189	2540360	278664	276889	SPAC17A5.09c	SPBC2G5.01	glc9	SPBC2G5.01	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807154301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774510	2542189	2542424	278664	278886	SPAC17A5.09c	SPAC1805.14	glc9	SPAC1805.14	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924792839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774511	2542189	2542700	278664	279153	SPAC17A5.09c	SPAC26H5.08c	glc9	bgl2	SPAC17A5.09c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.560944648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774512	2542189	2543090	278664	279523	SPAC17A5.09c	SPBC1348.01	glc9	SPBC1348.01	SPAC17A5.09c	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.076364509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774513	2540115	2542207	276652	278682	SPBC1778.02	SPAC17H9.10c	rap1	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.476955566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774514	2540115	2539050	276652	275623	SPBC1778.02	SPCC11E10.08	rap1	rik1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.997596507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774515	2540115	2540913	276652	277429	SPBC1778.02	SPBC56F2.08c	rap1	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.345509372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774516	2540115	2540455	276652	276983	SPBC1778.02	SPBC215.05	rap1	gpd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.909334154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774517	2540115	2539420	276652	275985	SPBC1778.02	SPCC970.07c	rap1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.777254857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774518	2540115	2539064	276652	275636	SPBC1778.02	SPCC126.06	rap1	twf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.389693665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774519	2540115	2543685	276652	280099	SPBC1778.02	SPAC3C7.03c	rap1	rad55	-	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.819588954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774520	2540115	2539823	276652	276373	SPBC1778.02	SPBC16A3.18	rap1	cip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.398990286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774521	2540115	2541834	276652	278325	SPBC1778.02	SPAC824.08	rap1	gda1	-	gdp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.749714138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774522	2540115	2542239	276652	278711	SPBC1778.02	SPAC18G6.02c	rap1	chp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389106592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774523	2540115	2542036	276652	278518	SPBC1778.02	SPAC23A1.19c	rap1	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.519428755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774524	2540115	2542646	276652	279100	SPBC1778.02	SPAC11H11.05c	rap1	fta6	-	sma6	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.892562781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774525	2540115	2540352	276652	276881	SPBC1778.02	SPBC215.03c	rap1	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.539348456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774526	2540115	2541496	276652	277998	SPBC1778.02	SPAC23D3.09	rap1	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.344609255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774527	2540115	2540772	276652	277292	SPBC1778.02	SPBC216.04c	rap1	mxr2	-	SPBC216.04c|MsrB	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810814678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774528	2540115	2539667	276652	276222	SPBC1778.02	SPBC13G1.08c	rap1	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.561302455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774529	2540115	2542007	276652	278490	SPBC1778.02	SPAC20H4.07	rap1	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.572364491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774530	2540115	2539481	276652	276044	SPBC1778.02	SPCC622.16c	rap1	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.169776315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774531	2540115	2538690	276652	275275	SPBC1778.02	SPCC1393.05	rap1	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.530741516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774532	2540115	2541378	276652	277889	SPBC1778.02	SPBP8B7.21	rap1	ubp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.406738021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774533	2540115	2542170	276652	278645	SPBC1778.02	SPAC17G8.13c	rap1	mst2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508569999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774534	2540115	2543663	276652	280077	SPBC1778.02	SPAC644.07	rap1	SPAC644.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87522509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774535	2540115	2542759	276652	279209	SPBC1778.02	SPAC9G1.07	rap1	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.654344674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774536	2540115	2543051	276652	279486	SPBC1778.02	SPAC1071.08	rap1	rpp203	-	rla6|rpp2-3|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.431887879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774537	2540115	2539925	276652	276469	SPBC1778.02	SPBC16H5.13	rap1	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.010666516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774538	2540115	2543439	276652	279859	SPBC1778.02	SPAPB1A10.13	rap1	SPAPB1A10.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931768094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774539	2540115	2540555	276652	277082	SPBC1778.02	SPBP16F5.02	rap1	mcs2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.359800537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774540	2540115	2539375	276652	275941	SPBC1778.02	SPCC4G3.11	rap1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.521938587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774541	2543021	2540727	279457	277250	SPAC11E3.15	SPBC1921.03c	rpl22	mex67	SPAP8A3.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.739368651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774542	2543021	2540498	279457	277026	SPAC11E3.15	SPBC27.02c	rpl22	ask1	SPAP8A3.01	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.56480163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774543	2543021	2543219	279457	279647	SPAC11E3.15	SPAC56F8.09	rpl22	rrp8	SPAP8A3.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.146188575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774544	2543021	2538792	279457	275373	SPAC11E3.15	SPCP1E11.10	rpl22	SPCP1E11.10	SPAP8A3.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63800761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774545	2543021	2543372	279457	279794	SPAC11E3.15	SPAPB1A10.09	rpl22	ase1	SPAP8A3.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.10301981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774546	2540792	2538939	277311	275514	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC1672.04c	kin1	SPCC1672.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.565413458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774547	2540792	2542072	277311	278549	SPBC4F6.06	SPAP32A8.03c	kin1	bop1	-	SPAP32A8.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.822716708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774548	2540792	2539774	277311	276325	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC17A3.10	kin1	pas4	-	pi036	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.505189315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774549	2540792	2539050	277311	275623	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC11E10.08	kin1	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.319599089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774550	2540792	2539147	277311	275719	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC622.12c	kin1	gdh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.46333361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774551	2540792	2542895	277311	279339	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC13G6.10c	kin1	asl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.631575239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774552	2540792	2538721	277311	275305	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC1494.10	kin1	adn3	-	SPCC70.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844483446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774553	2540792	2542862	277311	279308	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC140.03	kin1	arb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189320613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774554	2540792	2541475	277311	277977	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC24B11.09	kin1	mpc2	-	SPAC24B11.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.553090849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774555	2540792	2539841	277311	276389	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC17D1.05	kin1	SPBC17D1.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.209302109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774556	2540792	2541204	277311	277718	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC839.06	kin1	cta3	-	SPBC24E9.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981381218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774557	2540792	2541257	277311	277771	SPBC4F6.06	SPBP23A10.14c	kin1	ell1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381158466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774558	2540792	2542430	277311	278892	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC17G6.06	kin1	rps2401	-	rps24|rps24-1|rps24a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869861462	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774559	2540792	2542577	277311	279033	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC19G12.15c	kin1	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.688425882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774560	2540792	2542598	277311	279052	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC6G10.08	kin1	idp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.061632017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774561	2540792	3361499	277311	280575	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC25H1.09	kin1	mde5	-	SPAC4A8.01|meu30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392336524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774562	2540792	2542518	277311	278976	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC1B3.16c	kin1	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.063918264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774563	2540792	2542143	277311	278619	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC17C9.07	kin1	alg8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.085382978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774564	2540792	2542372	277311	278836	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC1F3.03	kin1	SPAC1F3.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.764306895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774565	2540792	2543152	277311	279584	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC869.03c	kin1	SPAC869.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.931802435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774566	2540792	2543655	277311	280069	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC9.08c	kin1	SPAC9.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.488936725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774567	2540792	2541913	277311	278403	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC227.04	kin1	atg10	-	SPAC227.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.71830433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774568	2540792	2542812	277311	279259	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC6F6.01	kin1	cch1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.764546508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774569	2540792	2541912	277311	278402	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC222.16c	kin1	csn3	-	SPAC821.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.185991317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774570	2540792	2538977	277311	275551	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC1020.06c	kin1	tal1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.280633906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774571	2540792	2541399	277311	277908	SPBC4F6.06	SPBPB10D8.01	kin1	SPBPB10D8.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382478298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774572	2540792	2543064	277311	279497	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC3G6.01	kin1	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.50762931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774573	2540792	2542671	277311	279124	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC824.09c	kin1	SPAC824.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.749558229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774574	2540792	2542643	277311	279097	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC2C4.07c	kin1	dis32	-	SPAC2C4.07c|dis3L2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.215341787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774575	2540792	2539156	277311	275728	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC1450.08c	kin1	wtf16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.540114501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774576	2540792	2541552	277311	278051	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC1142.08	kin1	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570830517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774577	2540792	2540524	277311	277052	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC21B10.08c	kin1	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.887557289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774578	2540792	2541650	277311	278146	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC14C4.12c	kin1	laf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205380174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774579	2540792	2542293	277311	278761	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC17G8.14c	kin1	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.529907073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774580	2540792	2540863	277311	277380	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC56F2.03	kin1	SPBC56F2.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.977995347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774581	2540792	2539227	277311	275797	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC191.11	kin1	inv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.910456387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774582	2540792	2540995	277311	277511	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC337.16	kin1	cho1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.719111744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774583	2540792	2543592	277311	280007	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC4F10.18	kin1	nup37	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.061701937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774584	2540792	2540528	277311	277056	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC18H10.04c	kin1	sce3	-	tif48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990594486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774585	2540792	2543339	277311	279762	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC630.13c	kin1	tsc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.87686948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774586	2540792	2538993	277311	275567	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC162.12	kin1	tco89	-	SPCC1753.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.806798205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774587	2540792	2542831	277311	279278	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC20H4.08	kin1	whi2	-	SPAC20H4.08|SPAC145.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.364205081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774588	2540792	2538896	277311	275474	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC584.11c	kin1	SPCC584.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.459181934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774589	2540792	2539930	277311	276474	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1198.11c	kin1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.253387853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774590	2540792	2541787	277311	278279	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC2E12.03c	kin1	SPAC2E12.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.836595084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774591	2540792	2539876	277311	276422	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1734.07c	kin1	trs8502	-	SPBC1734.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989434201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774592	2540792	2539910	277311	276455	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1683.12	kin1	SPBC1683.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.155062554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774593	2540792	3361119	277311	280195	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC663.07c	kin1	SPCC663.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323992977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774594	2540792	2540068	277311	276606	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1734.12c	kin1	alg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.021738108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774595	2540792	2539939	277311	276483	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC11G11.01	kin1	fis1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.133212183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774596	2540792	2542650	277311	279104	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC2C4.10c	kin1	csc4	-	SPAC2C4.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201555739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774597	2540792	2539097	277311	275669	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC757.04	kin1	SPCC757.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.383872145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774598	2540792	2542502	277311	278960	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC139.06	kin1	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814936829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774599	2540792	2541345	277311	277856	SPBC4F6.06	SPBP35G2.07	kin1	ilv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.559119017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774600	2540792	2540474	277311	277002	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC26H8.09c	kin1	snf59	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.237466005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774601	2540792	2543572	277311	279987	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC4G8.04	kin1	SPAC4G8.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781297366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774602	2540792	2539944	277311	276488	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1198.06c	kin1	SPBC1198.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.824370596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774603	2540792	2540347	277311	276876	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC30B4.08	kin1	eri1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049342944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774604	2540792	2541066	277311	277581	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC543.02c	kin1	SPBC543.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193122094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774605	2540792	2542614	277311	279068	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC1399.04c	kin1	SPAC1399.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.627993572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774606	2540792	2542701	277311	279154	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC26H5.05	kin1	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.211336015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774607	2540792	2542392	277311	278856	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC19D5.02c	kin1	SPAC19D5.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.077641353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774608	2540792	2542103	277311	278579	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC31G5.11	kin1	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.547563888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774609	2540792	2540579	277311	277105	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC28E12.02	kin1	SPBC28E12.02	-	SPBC9B6.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452267966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774610	2540792	2540535	277311	277062	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC215.01	kin1	SPBC215.01	-	SPBC3B9.20	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.717762627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774611	2540792	2540664	277311	277189	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC215.02	kin1	bob1	-	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042921489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774612	2540792	2538806	277311	275387	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC1840.09	kin1	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.05069035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774613	2540792	2543320	277311	279744	SPBC4F6.06	SPAPJ695.01c	kin1	SPAPJ695.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325721343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774614	2540792	2541286	277311	277799	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC9B6.11c	kin1	SPBC9B6.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.921981239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774615	2540792	2540375	277311	276904	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC2G2.06c	kin1	apl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.843521629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774616	2540792	2541891	277311	278381	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC1F8.03c	kin1	str3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711074599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774617	2540792	2541361	277311	277872	SPBC4F6.06	SPBP8B7.10c	kin1	utp16	-	SPBP8B7.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.512177806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774618	2540792	2540999	277311	277515	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC4B4.04	kin1	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.463215408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774619	2540792	2539332	277311	275898	SPBC4F6.06	SPCPB1C11.01	kin1	amt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.05534745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774620	2540792	2541235	277311	277749	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC8D2.12c	kin1	SPBC8D2.12c	-	pI053	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.620004001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774621	2540792	2539226	277311	275796	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC16C4.20c	kin1	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987988891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774622	2540792	2541200	277311	277714	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC8D2.03c	kin1	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.400222708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774623	2540792	2540015	277311	276559	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1685.02c	kin1	rps1202	-	rps12-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262191438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774624	2540792	2542468	277311	278929	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC1D4.09c	kin1	rtf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779441402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774625	2540792	2542107	277311	278583	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC30.01c	kin1	sec72	-	sec7b|sec702	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702825852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774626	2540792	2541951	277311	278438	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC222.05c	kin1	mss1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816879181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774627	2540792	2542677	277311	279130	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC26F1.10c	kin1	pyp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92732415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774628	2540792	2541313	277311	277825	SPBC4F6.06	SPBP26C9.02c	kin1	car1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580686491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774629	2540792	2538847	277311	275428	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC594.06c	kin1	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866183797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774630	2540792	2541471	277311	277973	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC1F5.03c	kin1	SPAC1F5.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575605099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774631	2540792	2541469	277311	277971	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC1F3.05	kin1	gga21	-	SPAC1F3.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195952838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774632	2540792	2541058	277311	277573	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC3H7.09	kin1	erf2	-	mug142	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.993688194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774633	2540792	2543156	277311	279587	SPBC4F6.06	SPAP8A3.13c	kin1	SPAP8A3.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645633313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774634	2540792	2539913	277311	276457	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC11G11.03	kin1	mrt4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.076228075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774635	2540792	2541682	277311	278178	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC15F9.02	kin1	seh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.936048858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774636	2540792	2539564	277311	276125	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC550.12	kin1	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.234734365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774637	2540792	2539235	277311	275805	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC1682.15	kin1	mug122	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.216114165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774638	2540792	2542669	277311	279122	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC29B12.08	kin1	clr5	-	SPAC29B12.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.402993875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774639	2540792	2543043	277311	279478	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC3F10.13	kin1	ucp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781677946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774640	2540792	2543681	277311	280095	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC9.02c	kin1	SPAC9.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.982511612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774641	2540792	2542724	277311	279175	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC767.01c	kin1	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.97005601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774642	2540792	2540919	277311	277435	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC543.07	kin1	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.083324118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774643	2540792	2540945	277311	277461	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC342.06c	kin1	rtt109	-	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321995018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774644	2540792	2543383	277311	279805	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC869.08	kin1	pcm2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.623104434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774645	2540792	2539434	277311	275997	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC757.09c	kin1	rnc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.284462034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774646	2540792	2543453	277311	279873	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC3G9.03	kin1	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.086976351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774647	2540792	2541026	277311	277541	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC337.09	kin1	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.97728012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774648	2540792	2541781	277311	278274	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC23G3.07c	kin1	snf30	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.265758123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774649	2540792	3361381	277311	280457	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC12G12.01c	kin1	SPAC12G12.01c	-	SPAC630.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046857045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774650	2540792	2540698	277311	277222	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC215.11c	kin1	SPBC215.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92514181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774651	2540792	2539064	277311	275636	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC126.06	kin1	twf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.869325733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774652	2540792	2539937	277311	276481	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1539.08	kin1	arf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.838473357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774653	2540792	2541761	277311	278255	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC7D4.12c	kin1	SPAC7D4.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.875725943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774654	2540792	2538825	277311	275406	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC757.12	kin1	SPCC757.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.886947907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774655	2540792	2539063	277311	275635	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC126.12	kin1	SPCC126.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.458442361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774656	2540792	2540993	277311	277509	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC342.01c	kin1	alg6	-	SPBC3F6.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.379396951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774657	2540792	2543029	277311	279465	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC11G7.01	kin1	SPAC11G7.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.536766336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774658	2540792	2541831	277311	278322	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC23G3.03	kin1	sib2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.354596664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774659	2540792	2538716	277311	275300	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC13B11.02c	kin1	SPCC13B11.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.183736728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774660	2540792	2541424	277311	277929	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC23G3.04	kin1	ies4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.569360309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774661	2540792	2541527	277311	278027	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC31A2.09c	kin1	apm4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.632588684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774662	2540792	2540295	277311	276826	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC3B8.05	kin1	SPBC3B8.05	-	dph1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194313975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774663	2540792	2542277	277311	278746	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC17A5.02c	kin1	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712191572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774664	2540792	2539441	277311	276004	SPBC4F6.06	SPCPJ732.02c	kin1	xks1	-	SPCPJ732.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640553522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774665	2540792	2541707	277311	278202	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC29E6.01	kin1	pof11	-	SPAC30.05|mug156	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5581151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774666	2540792	2539823	277311	276373	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC16A3.18	kin1	cip1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930526433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774667	2540792	2540364	277311	276893	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC29B5.02c	kin1	isp4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094268913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774668	2540792	2543308	277311	279732	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC694.04c	kin1	SPAC694.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.458691113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774669	2540792	2541960	277311	278447	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC6G9.15c	kin1	SPAC6G9.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.831197163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774670	2540792	2543110	277311	279542	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC56E4.06c	kin1	ggt2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810927665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774671	2540792	2540830	277311	277348	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC18H10.16	kin1	can1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381194865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774672	2540792	2542220	277311	278694	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC1A6.03c	kin1	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.551697511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774673	2540792	2539981	277311	276525	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1289.09	kin1	tim21	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807618292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774674	2540792	2541568	277311	278065	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC11D3.09	kin1	SPAC11D3.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.615671243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774675	2540792	2541311	277311	277823	SPBC4F6.06	SPBP8B7.09c	kin1	los1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.564695726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774676	2540792	2540127	277311	276664	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC106.20	kin1	exo70	-	SPBC582.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383116536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774677	2540792	2543108	277311	279540	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC3A12.13c	kin1	SPAC3A12.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.378823721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774678	2540792	2543641	277311	280055	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC3H5.08c	kin1	SPAC3H5.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.056383372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774679	2540792	2540059	277311	276597	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1198.01	kin1	fmd2	-	SPBC1198.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.00959974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774680	2540792	2543551	277311	279968	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC4G8.06c	kin1	trm12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.69971022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774681	2540792	2543563	277311	279979	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC664.02c	kin1	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.48586955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774682	2540792	2538698	277311	275283	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC1442.02	kin1	SPCC1442.02	-	SPCC1450.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.570613676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774683	2540792	2541522	277311	278023	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC23E2.01	kin1	fep1	-	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5495703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774684	2540792	2540714	277311	277237	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC19C2.04c	kin1	ubp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506593251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774685	2540792	2538927	277311	275503	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC1795.09	kin1	yps1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.995855103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774686	2540792	2541905	277311	278395	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC6G9.01c	kin1	SPAC6G9.01c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036341696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774687	2540792	2541416	277311	277923	SPBC4F6.06	SPBCPT2R1.01c	kin1	SPBCPT2R1.01c	-	SPBPB2B2.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.131735181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774688	2540792	2539100	277311	275672	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC330.12c	kin1	sdh3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041581579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774689	2540792	2542640	277311	279094	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC9E9.12c	kin1	ybt1	-	abc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.343560057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774690	2540792	2540415	277311	276943	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC30B4.06c	kin1	SPBC30B4.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578749198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774691	2540792	2538700	277311	275285	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC645.13	kin1	SPCC645.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.717735902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774692	2540792	2538972	277311	275546	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC1739.15	kin1	wtf21	-	wtf3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.549009069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774693	2540792	2539381	277311	275947	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC1739.10	kin1	mug33	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.257387338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774694	2540792	2542981	277311	279419	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC824.02	kin1	bst1	-	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.089907795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774695	2540792	2542034	277311	278516	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC27E2.04c	kin1	mug155	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205966967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774696	2540792	2541926	277311	278414	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC222.14c	kin1	SPAC222.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.560495327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774697	2540792	2541021	277311	277536	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC3B8.10c	kin1	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.489499446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774698	2540792	2540893	277311	277409	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC543.10	kin1	get1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.329970695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774699	2540792	2539310	277311	275877	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC285.17	kin1	spp27	-	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.190479108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774700	2540792	2542665	277311	279118	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC10F6.08c	kin1	nht10	-	nht1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875955115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774701	2540792	2541544	277311	278044	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC22G7.06c	kin1	ura1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.158272302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774702	2540792	2539032	277311	275605	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC4B3.05c	kin1	hem12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.120429984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774703	2540792	2539467	277311	276030	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC417.07c	kin1	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.499822477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774704	2540792	2539237	277311	275807	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC24B10.13	kin1	skb5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.255343983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774705	2540792	2540834	277311	277352	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC18H10.18c	kin1	SPBC18H10.18c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642064303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774706	2540792	2543537	277311	279954	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC4D7.05	kin1	sum1	-	tif34	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.985303746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774707	2540792	2542394	277311	278858	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC31G5.12c	kin1	maf1	-	n150	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98924981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774708	2540792	2538876	277311	275455	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC4B3.02c	kin1	SPCC4B3.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.92305368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774709	2540792	2539051	277311	275624	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC1183.11	kin1	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.114432754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774710	2540792	2541664	277311	278160	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC2H10.01	kin1	SPAC2H10.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446092223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774711	2540792	2539804	277311	276354	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1105.11c	kin1	hht3	-	h3.3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.562548426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774712	2540792	2541741	277311	278235	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC20G4.02c	kin1	fus1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.403269173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774713	2540792	2542177	277311	278652	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC17H9.08	kin1	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.560017619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774714	2540792	2539003	277311	275577	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC1442.17c	kin1	ist1	-	SPCC285.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.612638943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774715	2540792	2539870	277311	276416	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1709.18	kin1	tif452	-	SPBC409.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.854565327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774716	2540792	2541649	277311	278145	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC1F3.06c	kin1	spo15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870186682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774717	2540792	2539355	277311	275921	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC1840.08c	kin1	pdi5	-	SPCC1840.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.287356082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774718	2540792	2542484	277311	278944	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC1A6.07	kin1	sle1	-	SPAC1A6.07|seg1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.480209034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774719	2540792	2541801	277311	278292	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC2F7.08c	kin1	snf5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092146302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774720	2540792	2541249	277311	277763	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC947.01	kin1	alf1	-	SPBC947.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.626487477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774721	2540792	2543375	277311	279797	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC3H1.08c	kin1	SPAC3H1.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.121808114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774722	2540792	2540903	277311	277419	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC530.05	kin1	prt1	-	SPBC530.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.609540857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774723	2540792	2541800	277311	278291	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC732.02c	kin1	SPAC732.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.917364565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774724	2540792	2541615	277311	278112	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC27D7.11c	kin1	SPAC27D7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.38424781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774725	2540792	2541776	277311	278270	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC23H3.05c	kin1	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.200536305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774726	2540792	2541288	277311	277801	SPBC4F6.06	SPBP35G2.04c	kin1	SPBP35G2.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.615955457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774727	2540792	2542863	277311	279309	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC13G7.04c	kin1	mac1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.148230248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774728	2540792	2540192	277311	276725	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1215.01	kin1	shy1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.324561329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774729	2540792	2539473	277311	276036	SPBC4F6.06	SPCP25A2.02c	kin1	rhp26	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813371095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774730	2540792	2543144	277311	279576	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC3F10.05c	kin1	mug113	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.144735601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774731	2540792	2541982	277311	278467	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC23A1.06c	kin1	cmk2	-	mkp2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154386045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774732	2540792	3361560	277311	280636	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC14C4.09	kin1	agn1	-	SPAC14C4.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.944584044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774733	2540792	2541160	277311	277675	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC725.09c	kin1	hob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258451616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774734	2540792	2538811	277311	275392	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC330.03c	kin1	SPCC330.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.777415609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774735	2540792	3361491	277311	280567	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC1805.08	kin1	dlc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569812065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774736	2540792	2540338	277311	276867	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC2G2.13c	kin1	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.716774303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774737	2540792	2539990	277311	276534	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1289.14	kin1	SPBC1289.14	-	SPBC8E4.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331514612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774738	2540792	2542123	277311	278599	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC18G6.15	kin1	mal3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.837803011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774739	2540792	2538706	277311	275290	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC338.08	kin1	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446386952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774740	2540792	2542699	277311	279152	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC5H10.07	kin1	SPAC5H10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.442005313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774741	2540792	2539754	277311	276306	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC16C6.04	kin1	dbl6	-	SPBC16C6.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.449539589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774742	2540792	2540396	277311	276924	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC31F10.12	kin1	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.232774677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774743	2540792	2540673	277311	277198	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1D7.03	kin1	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.376413995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774744	2540792	2542983	277311	279421	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC11D3.15	kin1	SPAC11D3.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.132898453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774745	2540792	2541192	277311	277706	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC83.17	kin1	SPBC83.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.407767501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774746	2540792	2540150	277311	276687	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC16E9.14c	kin1	zrg17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.388550111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774747	2540792	2541735	277311	278229	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC7D4.04	kin1	atg11	-	taf1|cvt9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813503926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774748	2540792	2540363	277311	276892	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC2F12.09c	kin1	atf21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.607472776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774749	2540792	2541578	277311	278075	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC25B8.05	kin1	deg1	-	SPAC25B8.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.744986609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774750	2540792	2543208	277311	279637	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC328.04	kin1	SPAC328.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.404643244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774751	2540792	2541928	277311	278416	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC227.03c	kin1	SPAC227.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091262674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774752	2540792	2541943	277311	278430	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC222.07c	kin1	hri2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814276457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774753	2540792	2542989	277311	279427	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC11E3.13c	kin1	gas5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.688479726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774754	2540792	2543283	277311	279709	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC6C3.04	kin1	cit1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.381832795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774755	2540792	2542227	277311	278700	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC5H10.13c	kin1	gmh2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.493132548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774756	2540792	2539484	277311	276047	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC594.04c	kin1	SPCC594.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320782757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774757	2540792	2542921	277311	279362	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC1093.01	kin1	ppr5	-	SPAC12B10.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.04634364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774758	2540792	2542469	277311	278930	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC19A8.04	kin1	erg5	-	cyp61	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.799999854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774759	2540792	2542521	277311	278979	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC18G6.12c	kin1	SPAC18G6.12c	-	B22918-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382942558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774760	2540792	2539999	277311	276543	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1734.15	kin1	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.014625217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774761	2540792	2542522	277311	278980	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC19A8.03	kin1	ymr1	-	SPAC19A8.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.674323132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774762	2540792	2543313	277311	279737	SPBC4F6.06	SPAPJ691.03	kin1	SPAPJ691.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.159882742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774763	2540792	2541166	277311	277681	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC725.15	kin1	ura5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1979262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774764	2540792	2542877	277311	279322	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC13G6.15c	kin1	SPAC13G6.15c	-	SPAC24B11.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.258689191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774765	2540792	2542270	277311	278739	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC17H9.14c	kin1	pdi2	-	SPAC17H9.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.407920429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774766	2540792	2539603	277311	276161	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1289.06c	kin1	ppr8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.645330953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774767	2540792	2543246	277311	279674	SPBC4F6.06	SPAPB8E5.05	kin1	mfm1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201449486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774768	2540792	2543358	277311	279780	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC688.10	kin1	rev3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638697891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774769	2540792	2543245	277311	279673	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC56F8.06c	kin1	alg10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.628690787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774770	2540792	2541352	277311	277863	SPBC4F6.06	SPBPJ4664.03	kin1	mfm3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09725009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774771	2540792	2539857	277311	276404	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1604.20c	kin1	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325740693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774772	2540792	2542357	277311	278822	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC1782.07	kin1	qcr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.743275684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774773	2540792	2538826	277311	275407	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC1442.16c	kin1	zta1	-	SPCC285.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.614661847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774774	2540792	2543101	277311	279533	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC323.03c	kin1	SPAC323.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.440217332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774775	2540792	2541532	277311	278032	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC2C4.15c	kin1	ubx2	-	ucp13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.432357085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774776	2540792	2540831	277311	277349	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC428.02c	kin1	eca39	-	SPBC582.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.777786227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774777	2540792	2542193	277311	278668	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC9G1.11c	kin1	spn4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.128575289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774778	2540792	2540801	277311	277320	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC18H10.10c	kin1	saf4	-	cwc16|cwf16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.196686386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774779	2540792	2542857	277311	279303	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC144.06	kin1	apl5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.767768343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774780	2540792	2543250	277311	279678	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC3G9.15c	kin1	fcf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.154491041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774781	2540792	2538852	277311	275433	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC4E9.01c	kin1	rec11	-	SPCC550.16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.986255363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774782	2540792	2541710	277311	278205	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC343.11c	kin1	msc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.669601475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774783	2540792	2539284	277311	275852	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC584.15c	kin1	SPCC584.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.208792891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774784	2540792	2541824	277311	278315	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC27E2.02	kin1	SPAC27E2.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.286918198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774785	2540792	2541704	277311	278199	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC1250.04c	kin1	atl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.769597703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774786	2540792	2542409	277311	278873	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC17G8.10c	kin1	dma1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775172879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774787	2540792	2541401	277311	277910	SPBC4F6.06	SPBPB10D8.05c	kin1	SPBPB10D8.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979483026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774788	2540792	2538769	277311	275352	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC126.04c	kin1	sgf73	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.60987214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774789	2540792	2543631	277311	280045	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC458.02c	kin1	SPAC458.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.118119507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774790	2540792	2539667	277311	276222	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC13G1.08c	kin1	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.351546968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774791	2540792	2542861	277311	279307	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC13G7.13c	kin1	msa1	-	SPAC6C3.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.37696752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774792	2540792	3361269	277311	280345	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC31A8.01c	kin1	rtn1	-	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.827941042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774793	2540792	2540200	277311	276733	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1709.06	kin1	dus2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.012832338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774794	2540792	2540194	277311	276727	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1709.09	kin1	rrf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328155804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774795	2540792	2540665	277311	277190	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC83.02c	kin1	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.474065324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774796	2540792	2538873	277311	275452	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC306.11	kin1	SPCC306.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.622023381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774797	2540792	2538774	277311	275356	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC162.06c	kin1	SPCC162.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.37892293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774798	2540792	2542710	277311	279163	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC750.08c	kin1	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.075044194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774799	2540792	2538945	277311	275519	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC1739.06c	kin1	SPCC1739.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.881932209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774800	2540792	2542946	277311	279386	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC6F12.03c	kin1	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.11959962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774801	2540792	2540751	277311	277273	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC20F10.10	kin1	psl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926672879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774802	2540792	2542419	277311	278882	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC17G6.05c	kin1	bro1	-	SPAC17G6.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.68425157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774803	2540792	2539482	277311	276045	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC417.06c	kin1	mug27	-	ppk35|slk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.820750852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774804	2540792	2538982	277311	275556	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC1450.12	kin1	SPCC1450.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.901670368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774805	2540792	2538849	277311	275430	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC330.14c	kin1	rpl2402	-	rpl24-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.706096673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774806	2540792	2539974	277311	276518	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC32H8.07	kin1	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.055637567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774807	2540792	2541720	277311	278214	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC23H3.13c	kin1	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.616380226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774808	2540792	2543253	277311	279681	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC8C9.05	kin1	SPAC8C9.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.917492025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774809	2540792	2543236	277311	279664	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC8C9.04	kin1	SPAC8C9.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.76931566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774810	2540792	2543495	277311	279914	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC513.03	kin1	mfm2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.328852596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774811	2540792	2541241	277311	277755	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC887.17	kin1	SPBC887.17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92502207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774812	2540792	2543378	277311	279800	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC3H8.07c	kin1	pac10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.151226369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774813	2540792	2539958	277311	276502	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1718.07c	kin1	zfs1	-	moc4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.482888177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774814	2540792	2541900	277311	278390	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC23H4.17c	kin1	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.007104704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774815	2540792	2543301	277311	279726	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC977.17	kin1	SPAC977.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.75798005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774816	2540792	2543311	277311	279735	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC977.15	kin1	SPAC977.15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809442865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774817	2540792	2539408	277311	275973	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC576.12c	kin1	mhf2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.177714785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774818	2540792	2539481	277311	276044	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC622.16c	kin1	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512049504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774819	2540792	2543080	277311	279513	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC3A11.10c	kin1	SPAC3A11.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.126640569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774820	2540792	2543683	277311	280097	SPBC4F6.06	SPAPB1E7.04c	kin1	SPAPB1E7.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45441767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774821	2540792	2539424	277311	275989	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC622.19	kin1	jmj4	-	mug149	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.769719294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774822	2540792	2542056	277311	278535	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC6G9.14	kin1	SPAC6G9.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.488438194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774823	2540792	2543576	277311	279991	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC4A8.05c	kin1	myp2	-	myo3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.89329397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774824	2540792	2542437	277311	278899	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC17A5.01	kin1	pex6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642395664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774825	2540792	2542010	277311	278493	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC20H4.05c	kin1	SPAC20H4.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.075207102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774826	2540792	2541389	277311	277900	SPBC4F6.06	SPBPB2B2.09c	kin1	SPBPB2B2.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450658396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774827	2540792	2543561	277311	279977	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC922.04	kin1	SPAC922.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382124771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774828	2540792	2539348	277311	275914	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC18B5.07c	kin1	nup61	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.408641655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774829	2540792	2540019	277311	276563	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1685.01	kin1	pmp1	-	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.375720879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774830	2540792	3361262	277311	280338	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC691.01	kin1	pfa5	-	pi035	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.766843813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774831	2540792	2541536	277311	278036	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC1071.02	kin1	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.26352201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774832	2540792	2541053	277311	277568	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC56F2.10c	kin1	alg5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.508276629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774833	2540792	2539402	277311	275967	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC613.03	kin1	SPCC613.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.229658603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774834	2540792	2543307	277311	279731	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC694.05c	kin1	rps2502	-	rps25|rps25-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.031450495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774835	2540792	2540180	277311	276713	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC16D10.11c	kin1	rps1801	-	rps18-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.878274541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774836	2540792	2541479	277311	277981	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC27F1.06c	kin1	SPAC27F1.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.078753352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774837	2540792	2540016	277311	276560	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1773.09c	kin1	mug184	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866834141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774838	2540792	2540184	277311	276717	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC106.12c	kin1	SPBC106.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.566132289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774839	2540792	2542773	277311	279222	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC16.01	kin1	rho2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.184486066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774840	2540792	2539172	277311	275743	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC1020.08	kin1	SPCC1020.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.440596205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774841	2540792	2541296	277311	277808	SPBC4F6.06	SPBP8B7.06	kin1	rpp201	-	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.07543682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774842	2540792	2539427	277311	275992	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC663.15c	kin1	SPCC663.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.754124857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774843	2540792	2543390	277311	279812	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC631.01c	kin1	acp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866847272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774844	2540792	2538884	277311	275462	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC1393.08	kin1	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.405992697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774845	2540792	2542255	277311	278725	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC57A7.08	kin1	pzh1	-	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63631801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774846	2540792	2538839	277311	275420	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC338.18	kin1	SPCC338.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.768066914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774847	2540792	2543411	277311	279833	SPBC4F6.06	SPAPB1A10.10c	kin1	ypt71	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.141227964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774848	2540792	2543011	277311	279449	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC10F6.11c	kin1	atg17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.974376436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774849	2540792	2540988	277311	277504	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC354.08c	kin1	SPBC354.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.006293804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774850	2540792	2539812	277311	276362	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1347.02	kin1	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.214101551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774851	2540792	2541480	277311	277982	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC23D3.10c	kin1	eng2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.206492064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774852	2540792	2541337	277311	277848	SPBC4F6.06	SPBP35G2.13c	kin1	swc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.538173058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774853	2540792	2542329	277311	278795	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC9G1.10c	kin1	SPAC9G1.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.614889149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774854	2540792	2543254	277311	279682	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC1006.03c	kin1	red1	-	iss3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.43613172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774855	2540792	2543139	277311	279571	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC12G12.03	kin1	cip2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.66125494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774856	2540792	2539519	277311	276081	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC364.05	kin1	vps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.133683569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774857	2540792	2541742	277311	278236	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC22H10.09	kin1	SPAC22H10.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.68608899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774858	2540792	2542748	277311	279198	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC15A10.09c	kin1	pun1	-	SPAC15A10.09c|sur7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.610174557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774859	2540792	2538848	277311	275429	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC613.12c	kin1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57570301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774860	2540792	2540946	277311	277462	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC36.04	kin1	cys11	-	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.351922078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774861	2540792	2541628	277311	278124	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC110.02	kin1	pds5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.142611663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774862	2540792	2539763	277311	276314	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1861.05	kin1	SPBC1861.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.803815818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774863	2540792	2542170	277311	278645	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC17G8.13c	kin1	mst2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514501771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774864	2540792	2541670	277311	278166	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC24H6.13	kin1	SPAC24H6.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.048657209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774865	2540792	2542806	277311	279254	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC1610.01	kin1	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199255868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774866	2540792	2542198	277311	278673	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC6F12.09	kin1	rdp1	-	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321443245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774867	2540792	2539476	277311	276039	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC364.04c	kin1	coy1	-	SPCC364.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.150330302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774868	2540792	2539686	277311	276241	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1734.06	kin1	rhp18	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.814168705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774869	2540792	2542759	277311	279209	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC9G1.07	kin1	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.13858731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774870	2540792	2539499	277311	276062	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC622.08c	kin1	hta1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387486748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774871	2540792	2539101	277311	275673	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC736.04c	kin1	gma12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.306163577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774872	2540792	2542516	277311	278974	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC2F7.04	kin1	pmc2	-	med1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813357472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774873	2540792	2543619	277311	280033	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC4F10.04	kin1	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.25766874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774874	2540792	2543071	277311	279504	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC3C7.06c	kin1	pit1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.986289157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774875	2540792	2541175	277311	277689	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC839.13c	kin1	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.125959907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774876	2540792	2543106	277311	279538	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC3A11.13	kin1	SPAC3A11.13	-	SPAC3H5.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.383648063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774877	2540792	2540061	277311	276599	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC119.12	kin1	rud3	-	SPBC119.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.660990059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774878	2540792	2539137	277311	275709	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC1682.08c	kin1	mcp2	-	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.068334238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774879	2540792	2543670	277311	280084	SPBC4F6.06	SPAPB1E7.06c	kin1	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582275836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774880	2540792	2543567	277311	279983	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC890.03	kin1	ppk16	-	mug92	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81691944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774881	2540792	2539108	277311	275680	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC1223.02	kin1	nmt1	-	thi3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868893086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774882	2540792	2543419	277311	279841	SPBC4F6.06	SPAPB24D3.02c	kin1	SPAPB24D3.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87823812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774883	2540792	2539030	277311	275603	SPBC4F6.06	SPCP1E11.02	kin1	ppk38	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867342251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774884	2540792	2542515	277311	278973	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC1952.09c	kin1	SPAC1952.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.151049729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774885	2540792	2542621	277311	279075	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC5H10.05c	kin1	SPAC5H10.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865153008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774886	2540792	2542385	277311	278849	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC1805.02c	kin1	etf2	-	SPAC1805.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.080203147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774887	2540792	2540998	277311	277514	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC3D6.05	kin1	ptp4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044593266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774888	2540792	2539246	277311	275816	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC18.13	kin1	SPCC18.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.980509289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774889	2540792	2540960	277311	277476	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC3D6.02	kin1	but2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771363073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774890	2540792	2543096	277311	279528	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC977.05c	kin1	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.413652948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774891	2540792	2538962	277311	275536	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC965.13	kin1	SPCC965.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.749497881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774892	2540792	2541103	277311	277618	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC651.06	kin1	mug166	-	csa1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.269088161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774893	2540792	2543066	277311	279499	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC343.12	kin1	rds1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.034039262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774894	2540792	2540089	277311	276627	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC32H8.01c	kin1	SPBC32H8.01c	-	SPBP22H7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.192403071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774895	2540792	2543662	277311	280076	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC9.07c	kin1	SPAC9.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.26536807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774896	2540792	2541459	277311	277961	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC227.11c	kin1	SPAC227.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.131612177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774897	2540792	2541425	277311	277930	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC2C4.17c	kin1	msy2	-	SPAC2C4.17c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.87297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774898	2540792	2539346	277311	275912	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC569.04	kin1	SPCC569.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567773599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774899	2540792	2542997	277311	279435	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC11E3.14	kin1	SPAC11E3.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.344654851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774900	2540792	2538756	277311	275339	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC1795.10c	kin1	SPCC1795.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.769069895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774901	2540792	2539535	277311	276097	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC364.01	kin1	cif1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927080867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774902	2540792	2541114	277311	277629	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC582.09	kin1	pex11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699618325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774903	2540792	2540829	277311	277347	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC800.09	kin1	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.539489587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774904	2540792	2542906	277311	279350	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC13D6.03c	kin1	trm9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986279071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774905	2540792	2539136	277311	275708	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC1919.05	kin1	SPCC1919.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994138345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774906	2540792	2539318	277311	275884	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC1919.07	kin1	SPCC1919.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633783345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774907	2540792	2538916	277311	275493	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC16C4.17	kin1	mug123	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.768480944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774908	2540792	2539635	277311	276191	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC17D11.03c	kin1	SPBC17D11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.630730134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774909	2540792	2540677	277311	277202	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC21B10.03c	kin1	ath1	-	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.571266045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774910	2540792	2539729	277311	276281	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC11B10.07c	kin1	ivn1	-	pi004|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.243543055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774911	2540792	2539772	277311	276323	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1734.05c	kin1	spf31	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462658801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774912	2540792	2543437	277311	279857	SPBC4F6.06	SPAPB1A10.14	kin1	pof15	-	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.565969004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774913	2540792	2543649	277311	280063	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC3H5.11	kin1	SPAC3H5.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991081373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774914	2540792	2542826	277311	279273	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC13G6.09	kin1	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.003860227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774915	2540792	2542840	277311	279286	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC13G6.08	kin1	SPAC13G6.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913954456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774916	2540792	2539182	277311	275753	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC16A11.16c	kin1	rpn1302	-	rpn13|rpn13b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641562544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774917	2540792	2541380	277311	277891	SPBC4F6.06	SPBPB2B2.13	kin1	gal1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448518734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774918	2540792	2541817	277311	278308	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC23H4.09	kin1	cdb4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097024825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774919	2540792	2541789	277311	278281	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC23H4.08	kin1	iwr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.586008881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774920	2540792	2540182	277311	276715	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC16G5.06	kin1	SPBC16G5.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.792687899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774921	2540792	2542303	277311	278770	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC1687.21	kin1	SPAC1687.21	-	SPAC222.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.559319251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774922	2540792	2541744	277311	278238	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC23A1.02c	kin1	SPAC23A1.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.111537618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774923	2540792	2542250	277311	278720	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC17D4.03c	kin1	cis4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.285397422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774924	2540792	2540936	277311	277452	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC800.05c	kin1	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.026270604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774925	2540792	2543046	277311	279481	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC3C7.10	kin1	pex13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.334232477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774926	2540792	2542386	277311	278850	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC1805.01c	kin1	ppk6	-	SPAPJ736.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.331462175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774927	2540792	2538694	277311	275279	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC191.09c	kin1	gst1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.921259574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774928	2540792	2541757	277311	278251	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC2F7.10	kin1	akr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508749453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774929	2540792	2539702	277311	276255	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1604.12	kin1	SPBC1604.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.43334027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774930	2540792	2543516	277311	279934	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC4F10.11	kin1	spn1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.59364154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774931	2540792	2539545	277311	276106	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC4B3.12	kin1	set9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934741163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774932	2540792	3361511	277311	280587	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC23C4.08	kin1	rho3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.123580269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774933	2540792	2542904	277311	279348	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC144.11	kin1	rps1102	-	rps11|rps11-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.609296218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774934	2540792	2539920	277311	276464	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC119.08	kin1	pmk1	-	spm1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.847231786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774935	2540792	2540140	277311	276677	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC16C6.08c	kin1	qcr6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044602245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774936	2540792	2543525	277311	279943	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC4A8.14	kin1	SPAC4A8.14	-	prs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.880674087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774937	2540792	2543569	277311	279984	SPBC4F6.06	SPAPB24D3.03	kin1	SPAPB24D3.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815803653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774938	2540792	2542186	277311	278661	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC17C9.14	kin1	SPAC17C9.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.630428634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774939	2540792	2540551	277311	277078	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC23E6.01c	kin1	cxr1	-	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.367931046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774940	2540792	2543380	277311	279802	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC4G9.16c	kin1	rpl901	-	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.298439036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774941	2540792	2539189	277311	275760	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC1682.16	kin1	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.129379169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774942	2540792	2539178	277311	275749	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC1682.14	kin1	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.057663082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774943	2540792	2543337	277311	279760	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC959.08	kin1	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.566901832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774944	2540792	2542411	277311	278875	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC19B12.07c	kin1	SPAC19B12.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.337459872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774945	2540792	2540808	277311	277327	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC418.02	kin1	SPBC418.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508426718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774946	2540792	2542059	277311	278537	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC328.06	kin1	ubp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.236993172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774947	2540792	3361410	277311	280486	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC1527.01	kin1	mok11	-	SPAC23D3.15	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.667693182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774948	2540792	2539169	277311	275740	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC1235.11	kin1	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.367718784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774949	2540792	2538861	277311	275441	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC1620.11	kin1	nup97	-	mug87	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.075310699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774950	2540792	2541238	277311	277752	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC8E4.05c	kin1	SPBC8E4.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.350757942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774951	2540792	2543220	277311	279648	SPBC4F6.06	SPAPB21F2.02	kin1	SPAPB21F2.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.406492539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774952	2540792	2543379	277311	279801	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC821.09	kin1	eng1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.151474082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774953	2540792	2543384	277311	279806	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC637.06	kin1	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.046946953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774954	2540792	2541806	277311	278297	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC4G8.13c	kin1	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.184434118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774955	2540792	2541774	277311	278268	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC22E12.05c	kin1	rer1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.183939838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774956	2540792	2543327	277311	279750	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC1D4.06c	kin1	csk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934075771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774957	2540792	2541627	277311	278123	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC1F5.08c	kin1	yam8	-	ehs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.483899341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774958	2540792	2542159	277311	278635	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC1834.09	kin1	mug51	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.197794429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774959	2540792	2538854	277311	275435	SPBC4F6.06	SPCP1E11.05c	kin1	are2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.907587566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774960	2540792	2541466	277311	277968	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC14C4.06c	kin1	nab2	-	SPAC14C4.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.202931549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774961	2540792	2540070	277311	276608	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC119.04	kin1	mei3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.660680859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774962	2540792	2539531	277311	276093	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC576.02	kin1	SPCC576.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319483177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774963	2540792	2539128	277311	275700	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC1682.06	kin1	SPCC1682.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148894249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774964	2540792	2542175	277311	278650	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC1F3.02c	kin1	mkh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.896333465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774965	2540792	3361517	277311	280593	SPBC4F6.06	SPAP11E10.02c	kin1	mam3	-	SPAPB1A10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.051477352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774966	2540792	2543070	277311	279503	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC2H10.02c	kin1	SPAC2H10.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388635577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774967	2540792	2542566	277311	279022	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC8C9.12c	kin1	SPAC8C9.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.47957863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774968	2540792	2540626	277311	277152	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC21C3.08c	kin1	car2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869658901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774969	2540792	2539440	277311	276003	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC550.08	kin1	SPCC550.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036583888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774970	2540792	2541867	277311	278357	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC22E12.14c	kin1	sck2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.322435552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774971	2540792	2539085	277311	275657	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC285.15c	kin1	rps2802	-	rps28|rps28-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.614303625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774972	2540792	2539731	277311	276283	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1271.09	kin1	SPBC1271.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.768323922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774973	2540792	2541808	277311	278299	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC22A12.14c	kin1	SPAC22A12.14c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.46616856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774974	2540792	2543372	277311	279794	SPBC4F6.06	SPAPB1A10.09	kin1	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.922899154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774975	2540792	2543374	277311	279796	SPBC4F6.06	SPAPB1A10.08	kin1	SPAPB1A10.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.075180467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774976	2540792	2539976	277311	276520	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1683.07	kin1	mal1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152762034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774977	2540792	2543333	277311	279756	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC694.02	kin1	SPAC694.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.816536983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774978	2540792	2543090	277311	279523	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1348.01	kin1	SPBC1348.01	-	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.376214806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774979	2540792	2543014	277311	279452	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC11H11.02c	kin1	mug162	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.670901253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774980	2540792	2542859	277311	279305	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC13G6.13	kin1	SPAC13G6.13	-	SPAC24B11.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926893405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774981	2540792	2542890	277311	279334	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC13G6.14	kin1	aps1	-	SPAC24B11.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.698873867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774982	2540792	2538696	277311	275281	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC569.06	kin1	SPCC569.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331047329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774983	2540792	2540309	277311	276839	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC21B10.13c	kin1	yox1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.068743084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774984	2540792	2543624	277311	280038	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC4D7.06c	kin1	SPAC4D7.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.259468085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774985	2540792	2542094	277311	278571	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC29B12.06c	kin1	rcd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.081646587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774986	2540792	2542617	277311	279071	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC13A11.01c	kin1	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.102722939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774987	2540792	2541062	277311	277577	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC660.11	kin1	tcg1	-	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.613248694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774988	2540792	2541228	277311	277742	SPBC4F6.06	SPBP16F5.08c	kin1	SPBP16F5.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.515970752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774989	2540792	2539148	277311	275720	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC132.04c	kin1	gdh2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.122577801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774990	2540792	2541875	277311	278365	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC22F3.06c	kin1	lon1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.750276675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774991	2540792	2542836	277311	279282	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC13G7.06	kin1	met16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.123475412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774992	2540792	2543024	277311	279460	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC1039.02	kin1	SPAC1039.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868543806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774993	2540159	2543529	276694	279947	SPBC12C2.08	SPAC4C5.02c	dnm1	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.969289881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774994	2540159	2543152	276694	279584	SPBC12C2.08	SPAC869.03c	dnm1	SPAC869.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988113821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774995	2540159	2542098	276694	278574	SPBC12C2.08	SPAC30D11.01c	dnm1	gto2	-	SPAC30D11.01c|SPAC56F8.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148262156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774996	2540159	2542596	276694	279050	SPBC12C2.08	SPAC1B3.17	dnm1	clr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514697755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774997	2540159	2539217	276694	275787	SPBC12C2.08	SPCC1223.03c	dnm1	gut2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866212919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774998	2540159	2539488	276694	276051	SPBC12C2.08	SPCC645.08c	dnm1	snd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452048213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
774999	2540159	2543044	276694	279479	SPBC12C2.08	SPAC3C7.12	dnm1	tip1	-	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51294611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775000	2540159	2543387	276694	279809	SPBC12C2.08	SPAPB1E7.02c	dnm1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326996543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775001	2540159	2540125	276694	276662	SPBC12C2.08	SPBC16C6.01c	dnm1	SPBC16C6.01c	-	SPBC543.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047581549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775002	2542256	2542848	278726	279294	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAC9G1.03c	prp19	rpl3001	cwf8	rpl30|rpl30-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.744611528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775003	2542256	2542874	278726	279319	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAC20H4.09	prp19	SPAC20H4.09	cwf8	SPAC145.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.524509696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775004	2542256	2542222	278726	278695	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAC31G5.18c	prp19	sde2	cwf8	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.72069167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775005	2540799	2541475	277318	277977	SPBC18H10.15	SPAC24B11.09	cdk11	mpc2	ppk23	SPAC24B11.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.497367303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775006	2540799	2543559	277318	279975	SPBC18H10.15	SPAC664.04c	cdk11	rps1602	ppk23	rps16|rps16-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.282524101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775007	2540799	2543103	277318	279535	SPBC18H10.15	SPAC3F10.09	cdk11	SPAC3F10.09	ppk23	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.118225786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775008	2540799	2539226	277318	275796	SPBC18H10.15	SPCC16C4.20c	cdk11	SPCC16C4.20c	ppk23	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.644086199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775009	2540799	2542273	277318	278742	SPBC18H10.15	SPAC17H9.13c	cdk11	SPAC17H9.13c	ppk23	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.191148891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775010	2540799	2541500	277318	278002	SPBC18H10.15	SPAC227.18	cdk11	lys3	ppk23	SPAC2F7.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.002884769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775011	2540799	2543316	277318	279740	SPBC18H10.15	SPAPJ691.02	cdk11	SPAPJ691.02	ppk23	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.550238269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775012	2540799	2540692	277318	277217	SPBC18H10.15	SPBC800.07c	cdk11	tsf1	ppk23	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767156262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775013	2540799	2539331	277318	275897	SPBC18H10.15	SPCC24B10.09	cdk11	rps1702	ppk23	rps17|rps17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.062087039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775014	2540799	2539792	277318	276342	SPBC18H10.15	SPBC1271.14	cdk11	SPBC1271.14	ppk23	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.763983845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775015	2540799	2543308	277318	279732	SPBC18H10.15	SPAC694.04c	cdk11	SPAC694.04c	ppk23	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317398263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775016	2540799	2542981	277318	279419	SPBC18H10.15	SPAC824.02	cdk11	bst1	ppk23	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.128765689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775017	2540799	2541021	277318	277536	SPBC18H10.15	SPBC3B8.10c	cdk11	nem1	ppk23	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633307965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775018	2540799	2540964	277318	277480	SPBC18H10.15	SPBC365.16	cdk11	SPBC365.16	ppk23	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.09778142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775019	2540799	2542177	277318	278652	SPBC18H10.15	SPAC17H9.08	cdk11	SPAC17H9.08	ppk23	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.633032924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775020	2540799	2543593	277318	280008	SPBC18H10.15	SPAC4G9.10	cdk11	arg3	ppk23	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.631442872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775021	2540799	2541545	277318	278045	SPBC18H10.15	SPAC22F8.07c	cdk11	rtf1	ppk23	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.556810907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775022	2540799	2540338	277318	276867	SPBC18H10.15	SPBC2G2.13c	cdk11	dcd1	ppk23	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326701567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775023	2540799	2541496	277318	277998	SPBC18H10.15	SPAC23D3.09	cdk11	arp42	ppk23	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980876578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775024	2540799	2541183	277318	277697	SPBC18H10.15	SPBC725.14	cdk11	arg6	ppk23	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.179411385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775025	2540799	2539815	277318	276365	SPBC18H10.15	SPBC1105.02c	cdk11	lys4	ppk23	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.117373855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775026	2540799	2542867	277318	279312	SPBC18H10.15	SPAC343.16	cdk11	lys2	ppk23	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.221809527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775027	2540799	2542712	277318	279165	SPBC18H10.15	SPAC25B8.17	cdk11	SPAC25B8.17	ppk23	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38433608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775028	2540799	2539715	277318	276268	SPBC18H10.15	SPBC1778.09	cdk11	SPBC1778.09	ppk23	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444857512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775029	2540799	2541186	277318	277700	SPBC18H10.15	SPBC725.01	cdk11	SPBC725.01	ppk23	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.869991655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775030	2540799	2538884	277318	275462	SPBC18H10.15	SPCC1393.08	cdk11	SPCC1393.08	ppk23	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.901419325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775031	2540799	2542781	277318	279230	SPBC18H10.15	SPAC57A10.12c	cdk11	ura3	ppk23	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037168388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775032	2540799	2541017	277318	277532	SPBC18H10.15	SPBC36.07	cdk11	elp1	ppk23	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864135146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775033	2540799	2543391	277318	279813	SPBC18H10.15	SPAC4G9.09c	cdk11	arg11	ppk23	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.467882167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775034	2540799	2540044	277318	276582	SPBC18H10.15	SPBC1778.04	cdk11	spo6	ppk23	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820297149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775035	2540799	2543160	277318	279591	SPBC18H10.15	SPAC31A2.14	cdk11	bun107	ppk23	wdr48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.768943231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775036	2540799	2542386	277318	278850	SPBC18H10.15	SPAC1805.01c	cdk11	ppk6	ppk23	SPAPJ736.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932688406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775037	2540799	2543516	277318	279934	SPBC18H10.15	SPAC4F10.11	cdk11	spn1	ppk23	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145196965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775038	2540799	2539178	277318	275749	SPBC18H10.15	SPCC1682.14	cdk11	rpl1902	ppk23	rpl19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445230652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775039	2540799	2541050	277318	277565	SPBC18H10.15	SPBC428.05c	cdk11	arg12	ppk23	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.014944399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775040	2541643	2542207	278139	278682	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC17H9.10c	rad17	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.348168568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775041	2541643	2541656	278139	278152	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC25H1.06	rad17	pcf3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443996942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775042	2541643	2539156	278139	275728	SPAC14C4.13	SPCC1450.08c	rad17	wtf16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440253501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775043	2541643	2541345	278139	277856	SPAC14C4.13	SPBP35G2.07	rad17	ilv1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.264129362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775044	2541643	2540491	278139	277019	SPAC14C4.13	SPBC28E12.04	rad17	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874122885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775045	2541643	2540664	278139	277189	SPAC14C4.13	SPBC215.02	rad17	bob1	-	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.072933767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775046	2541643	2543320	278139	279744	SPAC14C4.13	SPAPJ695.01c	rad17	SPAPJ695.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.850111116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775047	2541643	2538775	278139	275357	SPAC14C4.13	SPCC23B6.05c	rad17	ssb3	-	rpa3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.478836161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775048	2541643	2539249	278139	275819	SPAC14C4.13	SPCC1450.05c	rad17	rox3	-	med19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.351122573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775049	2541643	2540945	278139	277461	SPAC14C4.13	SPBC342.06c	rad17	rtt109	-	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.393322872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775050	2541643	2543685	278139	280099	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC3C7.03c	rad17	rad55	-	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.26420419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775051	2541643	2541021	278139	277536	SPAC14C4.13	SPBC3B8.10c	rad17	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712903396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775052	2541643	2542036	278139	278518	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC23A1.19c	rad17	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.165473117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775053	2541643	2539952	278139	276496	SPAC14C4.13	SPBC1709.14	rad17	SPBC1709.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579142873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775054	2541643	2541250	278139	277764	SPAC14C4.13	SPBC8D2.17	rad17	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511910306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775055	2541643	2543598	278139	280013	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC4G9.14	rad17	SPAC4G9.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101086831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775056	2541643	2543593	278139	280008	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC4G9.10	rad17	arg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634908108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775057	2541643	2539340	278139	275906	SPAC14C4.13	SPCC1906.04	rad17	wtf20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503427806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775058	2541643	2540348	278139	276877	SPAC14C4.13	SPBC29A10.05	rad17	exo1	-	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.896565856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775059	2541643	2540338	278139	276867	SPAC14C4.13	SPBC2G2.13c	rad17	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.092371951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775060	2541643	2540352	278139	276881	SPAC14C4.13	SPBC215.03c	rad17	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.327533601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775061	2541643	2541911	278139	278401	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC212.04c	rad17	SPAC212.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.122004614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775062	2541643	2539603	278139	276161	SPAC14C4.13	SPBC1289.06c	rad17	ppr8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926501915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775063	2541643	2541413	278139	277921	SPAC14C4.13	SPBPJ4664.06	rad17	gpt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818853964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775064	2541643	2540086	278139	276624	SPAC14C4.13	SPBC16H5.12c	rad17	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.435809158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775065	2541643	2539000	278139	275574	SPAC14C4.13	SPCC1450.06c	rad17	grx3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.210176639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775066	2541643	2542007	278139	278490	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC20H4.07	rad17	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.064557027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775067	2541643	2541536	278139	278036	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC1071.02	rad17	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.510619701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775068	2541643	2538828	278139	275409	SPAC14C4.13	SPCC1020.05	rad17	SPCC1020.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.932176034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775069	2541643	2539213	278139	275783	SPAC14C4.13	SPCC285.10c	rad17	SPCC285.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.122876021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775070	2541643	2541488	278139	277990	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC227.17c	rad17	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196936384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775071	2541643	2539812	278139	276362	SPAC14C4.13	SPBC1347.02	rad17	fkbp39	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.033241823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775072	2541643	2539763	278139	276314	SPAC14C4.13	SPBC1861.05	rad17	SPBC1861.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.151100935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775073	2541643	2539686	278139	276241	SPAC14C4.13	SPBC1734.06	rad17	rhp18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642881976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775074	2541643	2539362	278139	275928	SPAC14C4.13	SPCC18B5.10c	rad17	SPCC18B5.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935764905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775075	2541643	2541909	278139	278399	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC227.01c	rad17	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.463581853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775076	2541643	2539770	278139	276321	SPAC14C4.13	SPBC1685.11	rad17	rlp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.262351828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775077	2541643	2543304	278139	279728	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC6B12.12	rad17	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980462896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775078	2541643	2543096	278139	279528	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC977.05c	rad17	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.909807861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775079	2541643	2541036	278139	277551	SPAC14C4.13	SPBC3H7.05c	rad17	SPBC3H7.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.272620935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775080	2541643	2538792	278139	275373	SPAC14C4.13	SPCP1E11.10	rad17	SPCP1E11.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.812785206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775081	2541643	2543387	278139	279809	SPAC14C4.13	SPAPB1E7.02c	rad17	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.748942891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775082	2541643	2540481	278139	277009	SPAC14C4.13	SPBC2D10.12	rad17	rhp23	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.408878547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775083	2541643	2541478	278139	277980	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC2F7.17	rad17	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262398461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775084	2539444	2542207	276007	278682	SPCC576.13	SPAC17H9.10c	swc5	ddb1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.919562726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775085	2539444	2542577	276007	279033	SPCC576.13	SPAC19G12.15c	swc5	tpp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.510748514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775086	2539444	2542585	276007	279040	SPCC576.13	SPAC31A2.13c	swc5	sft1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.27593772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775087	2539444	2542372	276007	278836	SPCC576.13	SPAC1F3.03	swc5	SPAC1F3.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32842365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775088	2539444	2539930	276007	276474	SPCC576.13	SPBC1198.11c	swc5	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929203164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775089	2539444	3361561	276007	280637	SPCC576.13	SPAC11E3.01c	swc5	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201229439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775090	2539444	2541117	276007	277632	SPCC576.13	SPBC646.13	swc5	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.132881968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775091	2539444	2539263	276007	275833	SPCC576.13	SPCC895.09c	swc5	ucp12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.498910069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775092	2539444	2539309	276007	275876	SPCC576.13	SPCC4G3.19	swc5	alp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.853231763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775093	2539444	2542273	276007	278742	SPCC576.13	SPAC17H9.13c	swc5	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876990942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775094	2539444	2539564	276007	276125	SPCC576.13	SPCC550.12	swc5	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.261247497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775095	2539444	2542724	276007	279175	SPCC576.13	SPAC767.01c	swc5	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.404598942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775096	2539444	2540945	276007	277461	SPCC576.13	SPBC342.06c	swc5	rtt109	-	kat11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81104576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775097	2539444	2543453	276007	279873	SPCC576.13	SPAC3G9.03	swc5	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04429525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775098	2539444	2541026	276007	277541	SPCC576.13	SPBC337.09	swc5	erg28	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.97464112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775099	2539444	2542012	276007	278495	SPCC576.13	SPAC23C11.02c	swc5	rps23	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.15352418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775100	2539444	2542022	276007	278505	SPCC576.13	SPAC23A1.03	swc5	apt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515862656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775101	2539444	2542318	276007	278784	SPCC576.13	SPAC16C9.05	swc5	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.831470484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775102	2539444	2543641	276007	280055	SPCC576.13	SPAC3H5.08c	swc5	SPAC3H5.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152716088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775103	2539444	2543563	276007	279979	SPCC576.13	SPAC664.02c	swc5	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.098168292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775104	2539444	2541522	276007	278023	SPCC576.13	SPAC23E2.01	swc5	fep1	-	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.386209673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775105	2539444	2539352	276007	275918	SPCC576.13	SPCC188.07	swc5	ccq1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189981702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775106	2539444	2542981	276007	279419	SPCC576.13	SPAC824.02	swc5	bst1	-	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.568159114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775107	2539444	2540964	276007	277480	SPCC576.13	SPBC365.16	swc5	SPBC365.16	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.61377991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775108	2539444	2542331	276007	278797	SPCC576.13	SPAC1834.05	swc5	alg9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923729692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775109	2539444	2542568	276007	279024	SPCC576.13	SPAC1952.02	swc5	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.328720609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775110	2539444	2542177	276007	278652	SPCC576.13	SPAC17H9.08	swc5	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.178885561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775111	2539444	2538821	276007	275402	SPCC576.13	SPCC584.01c	swc5	SPCC584.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382925874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775112	2539444	2541250	276007	277764	SPCC576.13	SPBC8D2.17	swc5	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.542899849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775113	2539444	2540892	276007	277408	SPCC576.13	SPBC530.01	swc5	gyp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094697273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775114	2539444	2541545	276007	278045	SPCC576.13	SPAC22F8.07c	swc5	rtf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869846626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775115	2539444	2541160	276007	277675	SPCC576.13	SPBC725.09c	swc5	hob3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.265801995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775116	2539444	2543412	276007	279834	SPCC576.13	SPAC637.07	swc5	moe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513775294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775117	2539444	2541192	276007	277706	SPCC576.13	SPBC83.17	swc5	SPBC83.17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865641874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775118	2539444	2542817	276007	279264	SPCC576.13	SPAC13G6.02c	swc5	rps101	-	rps1-1|rps3a-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.273117324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775119	2539444	2543531	276007	279949	SPCC576.13	SPAC926.06c	swc5	SPAC926.06c	-	lrr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.203749357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775120	2539444	2540661	276007	277186	SPCC576.13	SPBC23E6.03c	swc5	nta1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985267413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775121	2539444	2541710	276007	278205	SPCC576.13	SPAC343.11c	swc5	msc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.026681561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775122	2539444	2539667	276007	276222	SPCC576.13	SPBC13G1.08c	swc5	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.993206623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775123	2539444	2542946	276007	279386	SPCC576.13	SPAC6F12.03c	swc5	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978197949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775124	2539444	2542519	276007	278977	SPCC576.13	SPAC19G12.08	swc5	scs7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.923926669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775125	2539444	5802861	276007	857999	SPCC576.13	SPAC1D4.01	swc5	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452101216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775126	2539444	2540990	276007	277506	SPCC576.13	SPBC36B7.06c	swc5	mug20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985107867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775127	2539444	2539402	276007	275967	SPCC576.13	SPCC613.03	swc5	SPCC613.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.072254798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775128	2539444	2540967	276007	277483	SPCC576.13	SPBC36B7.08c	swc5	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.498193842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775129	2539444	2542597	276007	279051	SPCC576.13	SPAP8A3.07c	swc5	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098473039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775130	2539444	2540599	276007	277125	SPCC576.13	SPBC29A3.10c	swc5	atp14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.151573853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775131	2539444	2540533	276007	277061	SPCC576.13	SPBC29A10.16c	swc5	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.144676828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775132	2539444	2541680	276007	278176	SPCC576.13	SPAC22F8.09	swc5	rrp16	-	nop53	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.338489885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775133	2539444	2543011	276007	279449	SPCC576.13	SPAC10F6.11c	swc5	atg17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872404529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775134	2539444	2541337	276007	277848	SPCC576.13	SPBP35G2.13c	swc5	swc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.874240115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775135	2539444	2539527	276007	276089	SPCC576.13	SPCC338.16	swc5	pof3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711488675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775136	2539444	2539519	276007	276081	SPCC576.13	SPCC364.05	swc5	vps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.918212234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775137	2539444	2540691	276007	277216	SPCC576.13	SPBC20F10.05	swc5	nrl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.774287586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775138	2539444	2541628	276007	278124	SPCC576.13	SPAC110.02	swc5	pds5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816821094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775139	2539444	2540910	276007	277426	SPCC576.13	SPBC577.02	swc5	rpl3801	-	rpl38-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.763307778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775140	2539444	2542806	276007	279254	SPCC576.13	SPAC1610.01	swc5	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.560856593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775141	2539444	2541156	276007	277671	SPCC576.13	SPBC685.07c	swc5	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.612791072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775142	2539444	2543628	276007	280042	SPCC576.13	SPAC3H8.10	swc5	spo20	-	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.263160694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775143	2539444	2543051	276007	279486	SPCC576.13	SPAC1071.08	swc5	rpp203	-	rla6|rpp2-3|rpa2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.620436067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775144	2539444	2541175	276007	277689	SPCC576.13	SPBC839.13c	swc5	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.277667112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775145	2539444	2540800	276007	277319	SPCC576.13	SPBC409.20c	swc5	psh3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979356899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775146	2539444	2543304	276007	279728	SPCC576.13	SPAC6B12.12	swc5	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.406370173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775147	2539444	2541531	276007	278031	SPCC576.13	SPAC25A8.01c	swc5	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.494517792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775148	2539444	2539013	276007	275586	SPCC576.13	SPCC364.03	swc5	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.263283448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775149	2539444	2542222	276007	278695	SPCC576.13	SPAC31G5.18c	swc5	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771811116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775150	2539444	2543427	276007	279847	SPCC576.13	SPAPB1A10.15	swc5	arv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.271876204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775151	2539444	2542250	276007	278720	SPCC576.13	SPAC17D4.03c	swc5	cis4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.202449723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775152	2539444	2539189	276007	275760	SPCC576.13	SPCC1682.16	swc5	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.818862603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775153	2539444	2539178	276007	275749	SPCC576.13	SPCC1682.14	swc5	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.461102563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775154	2539444	2542716	276007	279169	SPCC576.13	SPAC25H1.07	swc5	emc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4410117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775155	2539444	2543220	276007	279648	SPCC576.13	SPAPB21F2.02	swc5	SPAPB21F2.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.454374967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775156	2539444	2543384	276007	279806	SPCC576.13	SPAC637.06	swc5	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.227456331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775157	2539444	2543087	276007	279520	SPCC576.13	SPAC30C2.04	swc5	SPAC30C2.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.344203545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775158	2539444	2543372	276007	279794	SPCC576.13	SPAPB1A10.09	swc5	ase1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039845206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775159	2539444	2543448	276007	279868	SPCC576.13	SPAC3H5.07	swc5	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.283046104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775160	2539444	2543472	276007	279892	SPCC576.13	SPAC959.04c	swc5	omh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.846628417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775161	2539444	2541062	276007	277577	SPCC576.13	SPBC660.11	swc5	tcg1	-	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.684634748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775162	2539444	2542836	276007	279282	SPCC576.13	SPAC13G7.06	swc5	met16	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193638154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775163	2543580	2539841	279995	276389	SPAC644.14c	SPBC17D1.05	rad51	SPBC17D1.05	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567218214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775164	2543580	2541512	279995	278013	SPAC644.14c	SPAC11E3.08c	rad51	nse6	rhp51	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98719153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775165	2543580	2540913	279995	277429	SPAC644.14c	SPBC56F2.08c	rad51	SPBC56F2.08c	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852839663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775166	2543580	2541912	279995	278402	SPAC644.14c	SPAC222.16c	rad51	csn3	rhp51	SPAC821.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.069464142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775167	2543580	2543414	279995	279836	SPAC644.14c	SPAC630.10	rad51	SPAC630.10	rhp51	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868095755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775168	2543580	2541818	279995	278309	SPAC644.14c	SPAC11G7.02	rad51	pub1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.26101294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775169	2543580	2543064	279995	279497	SPAC644.14c	SPAC3G6.01	rad51	hrp3	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.744778321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775170	2543580	2540131	279995	276668	SPAC644.14c	SPBC1778.05c	rad51	SPBC1778.05c	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.942821926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775171	2543580	2542197	279995	278672	SPAC644.14c	SPAC1142.01	rad51	rqc1	rhp51	SPAC1142.01|SPAC17G6.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.900118113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775172	2543580	2542237	279995	278709	SPAC644.14c	SPAC19E9.02	rad51	fin1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508447201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775173	2543580	2541438	279995	277943	SPAC644.14c	SPAC23G3.10c	rad51	ssr3	rhp51	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.203695202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775174	2543580	2542747	279995	279197	SPAC644.14c	SPAC15A10.06	rad51	SPAC15A10.06	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.838024711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775175	2543580	2541633	279995	278129	SPAC644.14c	SPAC664.01c	rad51	swi6	rhp51	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.707829479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775176	2543580	2540347	279995	276876	SPAC644.14c	SPBC30B4.08	rad51	eri1	rhp51	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867405618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775177	2543580	2543652	279995	280066	SPAC644.14c	SPAC4H3.03c	rad51	SPAC4H3.03c	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.62008394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775178	2543580	2539890	279995	276436	SPAC644.14c	SPBC16C6.03c	rad51	SPBC16C6.03c	rhp51	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.454343103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775179	2543580	2540579	279995	277105	SPAC644.14c	SPBC28E12.02	rad51	SPBC28E12.02	rhp51	SPBC9B6.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810146392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775180	2543580	2542345	279995	278811	SPAC644.14c	SPAC1705.02	rad51	SPAC1705.02	rhp51	SPAC1F2.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.989184893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775181	2543580	2540975	279995	277491	SPAC644.14c	SPBC354.12	rad51	gpd3	rhp51	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.770710413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775182	2543580	2539420	279995	275985	SPAC644.14c	SPCC970.07c	rad51	raf2	rhp51	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.953208512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775183	2543580	2541208	279995	277722	SPAC644.14c	SPBC887.04c	rad51	lub1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.268064716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775184	2543580	2542714	279995	279167	SPAC644.14c	SPAC5H10.06c	rad51	adh4	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.564952923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775185	2543580	2541964	279995	278450	SPAC644.14c	SPAC2F3.08	rad51	sut1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.38936832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775186	2543580	2541781	279995	278274	SPAC644.14c	SPAC23G3.07c	rad51	snf30	rhp51	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145434342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775187	2543580	2542022	279995	278505	SPAC644.14c	SPAC23A1.03	rad51	apt1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.923749447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775188	2543580	3361342	279995	280418	SPAC644.14c	SPBC16D10.07c	rad51	sir2	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.166484858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775189	2543580	2542318	279995	278784	SPAC644.14c	SPAC16C9.05	rad51	cph1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.192394038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775190	2543580	2540595	279995	277121	SPAC644.14c	SPBC21C3.02c	rad51	dep1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.499817028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775191	2543580	2541580	279995	278077	SPAC644.14c	SPAC1687.05	rad51	pli1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.15772311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775192	2543580	2539244	279995	275814	SPAC644.14c	SPCC1672.06c	rad51	asp1	rhp51	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703770474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775193	2543580	2540023	279995	276567	SPAC644.14c	SPBC11C11.10	rad51	SPBC11C11.10	rhp51	SPBC3B8.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446271368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775194	2543580	2542791	279995	279240	SPAC644.14c	SPAC167.04	rad51	pam17	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913893331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775195	2543580	2540825	279995	277343	SPAC644.14c	SPBC428.08c	rad51	clr4	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.474287348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775196	2543580	2542558	279995	279014	SPAC644.14c	SPAC1952.07	rad51	rad1	rhp51	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.524691025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775197	2543580	2540893	279995	277409	SPAC644.14c	SPBC543.10	rad51	get1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.616987416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775198	2543580	2542554	279995	279011	SPAC644.14c	SPAC1952.03	rad51	otu2	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.68335827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775199	2543580	2542153	279995	278629	SPAC644.14c	SPAC1952.10c	rad51	SPAC1952.10c	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450915258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775200	2543580	2542568	279995	279024	SPAC644.14c	SPAC1952.02	rad51	tma23	rhp51	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047692367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775201	2543580	2541544	279995	278044	SPAC644.14c	SPAC22G7.06c	rad51	ura1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320012317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775202	2543580	2542268	279995	278737	SPAC644.14c	SPAC17A5.07c	rad51	ulp2	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.644309577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775203	2543580	2539467	279995	276030	SPAC644.14c	SPCC417.07c	rad51	mto1	rhp51	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.010778069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775204	2543580	2543514	279995	279932	SPAC644.14c	SPAC4D7.03	rad51	pop2	rhp51	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.056869426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775205	2543580	2539705	279995	276258	SPAC644.14c	SPBC1105.10	rad51	rav1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769799287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775206	2543580	2542596	279995	279050	SPAC644.14c	SPAC1B3.17	rad51	clr2	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.345879663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775207	2543580	2542499	279995	278958	SPAC644.14c	SPAC1F12.04c	rad51	SPAC1F12.04c	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.629605744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775208	2543580	2541249	279995	277763	SPAC644.14c	SPBC947.01	rad51	alf1	rhp51	SPBC947.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.628458722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775209	2543580	2540892	279995	277408	SPAC644.14c	SPBC530.01	rad51	gyp1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712098938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775210	2543580	2541288	279995	277801	SPAC644.14c	SPBP35G2.04c	rad51	SPBP35G2.04c	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575386767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775211	2543580	2541982	279995	278467	SPAC644.14c	SPAC23A1.06c	rad51	cmk2	rhp51	mkp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325760043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775212	2543580	2539845	279995	276393	SPAC644.14c	SPBC12C2.02c	rad51	ste20	rhp51	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.880146082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775213	2543580	2539990	279995	276534	SPAC644.14c	SPBC1289.14	rad51	SPBC1289.14	rhp51	SPBC8E4.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.821202642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775214	2543580	2538706	279995	275290	SPAC644.14c	SPCC338.08	rad51	ctp1	rhp51	mug38|nip1|slr9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046417866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775215	2543580	2542160	279995	278636	SPAC644.14c	SPAC8C9.11	rad51	fra2	rhp51	SPAC8C9.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386881807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775216	2543580	2539999	279995	276543	SPAC644.14c	SPBC1734.15	rad51	rsc4	rhp51	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582626668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775217	2543580	2543313	279995	279737	SPAC644.14c	SPAPJ691.03	rad51	SPAPJ691.03	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388131314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775218	2543580	2543667	279995	280081	SPAC644.14c	SPAC4H3.02c	rad51	swc3	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.908844783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775219	2543580	2541413	279995	277921	SPAC644.14c	SPBPJ4664.06	rad51	gpt1	rhp51	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875710437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775220	2543580	2538852	279995	275433	SPAC644.14c	SPCC4E9.01c	rad51	rec11	rhp51	SPCC550.16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.155504699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775221	2543580	2541187	279995	277701	SPAC644.14c	SPBC776.14	rad51	plh1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387839811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775222	2543580	2539667	279995	276222	SPAC644.14c	SPBC13G1.08c	rad51	ash2	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.416921241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775223	2543580	2542946	279995	279386	SPAC644.14c	SPAC6F12.03c	rad51	fsv1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.191409367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775224	2543580	2540751	279995	277273	SPAC644.14c	SPBC20F10.10	rad51	psl1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.268188901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775225	2543580	2542976	279995	279414	SPAC644.14c	SPAC9E9.09c	rad51	atd1	rhp51	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049949098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775226	2543580	2538880	279995	275459	SPAC644.14c	SPCC1393.09c	rad51	SPCC1393.09c	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.683840316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775227	2543580	2539974	279995	276518	SPAC644.14c	SPBC32H8.07	rad51	git5	rhp51	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094929232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775228	2543580	2539408	279995	275973	SPAC644.14c	SPCC576.12c	rad51	mhf2	rhp51	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.33739941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775229	2543580	2539481	279995	276044	SPAC644.14c	SPCC622.16c	rad51	epe1	rhp51	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506956769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775230	2543580	2540776	279995	277296	SPAC644.14c	SPBC428.07	rad51	meu6	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.449925169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775231	2543580	2542618	279995	279072	SPAC644.14c	SPAC1952.15c	rad51	rec24	rhp51	mug6	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.99220508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775232	2543580	2541536	279995	278036	SPAC644.14c	SPAC1071.02	rad51	mms19	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.50619048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775233	2543580	2540967	279995	277483	SPAC644.14c	SPBC36B7.08c	rad51	SPBC36B7.08c	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582977445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775234	2543580	2541054	279995	277569	SPAC644.14c	SPBC3B8.08	rad51	SPBC3B8.08	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.906825351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775235	2543580	2541746	279995	278240	SPAC644.14c	SPAC20G4.04c	rad51	hus1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.769995651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775236	2543580	2543011	279995	279449	SPAC644.14c	SPAC10F6.11c	rad51	atg17	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447516995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775237	2543580	2543139	279995	279571	SPAC644.14c	SPAC12G12.03	rad51	cip2	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.254786028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775238	2543580	2540930	279995	277446	SPAC644.14c	SPBC354.10	rad51	def1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994863964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775239	2543580	2538848	279995	275429	SPAC644.14c	SPCC613.12c	rad51	raf1	rhp51	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.711081239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775240	2543580	2540821	279995	277339	SPAC644.14c	SPBC800.03	rad51	clr3	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6818968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775241	2543580	2539932	279995	276476	SPAC644.14c	SPBC13E7.07	rad51	SPBC13E7.07	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582645791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775242	2543580	2539908	279995	276454	SPAC644.14c	SPBC13E7.06	rad51	msd1	rhp51	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.61933886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775243	2543580	2540910	279995	277426	SPAC644.14c	SPBC577.02	rad51	rpl3801	rhp51	rpl38-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574727002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775244	2543580	2539476	279995	276039	SPAC644.14c	SPCC364.04c	rad51	coy1	rhp51	SPCC364.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.314889492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775245	2543580	2539160	279995	275732	SPAC644.14c	SPCC18.17c	rad51	SPCC18.17c	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.748162308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775246	2543580	2539453	279995	276016	SPAC644.14c	SPCPB1C11.03	rad51	SPCPB1C11.03	rhp51	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048687017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775247	2543580	2539748	279995	276300	SPAC644.14c	SPBC11C11.01	rad51	SPBC11C11.01	rhp51	SPBC17D1.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.442320028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775248	2543580	2539354	279995	275920	SPAC644.14c	SPCC4F11.03c	rad51	SPCC4F11.03c	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.627277944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775249	2543580	2542769	279995	279219	SPAC644.14c	SPAC15A10.10	rad51	mde6	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.617609763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775250	2543580	2540498	279995	277026	SPAC644.14c	SPBC27.02c	rad51	ask1	rhp51	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.759862912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775251	2543580	2542401	279995	278865	SPAC644.14c	SPAC1142.02c	rad51	SPAC1142.02c	rhp51	SPAC17G6.19c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636747752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775252	2543580	2543267	279995	279695	SPAC644.14c	SPAC1002.12c	rad51	SPAC1002.12c	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.169959232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775253	2543580	2541121	279995	277636	SPAC644.14c	SPBC609.03	rad51	iqw1	rhp51	iqwd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382595124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775254	2543580	2540814	279995	277333	SPAC644.14c	SPBC4B4.10c	rad51	atg5	rhp51	mug77	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.839526817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775255	2543580	2540800	279995	277319	SPAC644.14c	SPBC409.20c	rad51	psh3	rhp51	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097203957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775256	2543580	2539770	279995	276321	SPAC644.14c	SPBC1685.11	rad51	rlp1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.502663979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775257	2543580	2540152	279995	276688	SPAC644.14c	SPBC12C2.03c	rad51	SPBC12C2.03c	rhp51	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.513509963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775258	2543580	2542541	279995	278998	SPAC644.14c	SPAC1B3.03c	rad51	wis2	rhp51	cyp5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508141784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775259	2543580	2540531	279995	277059	SPAC644.14c	SPBC23E6.08	rad51	sat1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.560606996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775260	2543580	2540115	279995	276652	SPAC644.14c	SPBC1778.02	rad51	rap1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.121211603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775261	2543580	2541367	279995	277878	SPAC644.14c	SPBP8B7.13	rad51	vac7	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318321362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775262	2543580	2543368	279995	279790	SPAC644.14c	SPAC630.06c	rad51	SPAC630.06c	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442156927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775263	2543580	2540829	279995	277347	SPAC644.14c	SPBC800.09	rad51	sum2	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.678297849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775264	2543580	2541229	279995	277743	SPAC644.14c	SPBC839.05c	rad51	rps1701	rhp51	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.150925792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775265	2543580	2543091	279995	279524	SPAC644.14c	SPAC12G12.15	rad51	sif3	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391591151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775266	2543580	2540064	279995	276602	SPAC644.14c	SPBC1718.02	rad51	hop1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447682383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775267	2543580	2540928	279995	277444	SPAC644.14c	SPBC3E7.10	rad51	fma1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.367113425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775268	2543580	2540992	279995	277508	SPAC644.14c	SPBC342.05	rad51	crb2	rhp51	rhp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.269937483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775269	2543580	2540927	279995	277443	SPAC644.14c	SPBC365.06	rad51	pmt3	rhp51	smt3|ubl2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.762598186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775270	2543580	2541757	279995	278251	SPAC644.14c	SPAC2F7.10	rad51	akr1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439507894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775271	2543580	2540432	279995	276960	SPAC644.14c	SPBC25H2.05	rad51	egd2	rhp51	nac1|ucp15	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.192580144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775272	2543580	2542607	279995	279061	SPAC644.14c	SPAC18B11.02c	rad51	SPAC18B11.02c	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.755215649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775273	2543580	2539375	279995	275941	SPAC644.14c	SPCC4G3.11	rad51	mug154	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.192562171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775274	2543580	2539189	279995	275760	SPAC644.14c	SPCC1682.16	rad51	rpt4	rhp51	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.509001362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775275	2543580	2542119	279995	278595	SPAC644.14c	SPAC1834.08	rad51	mak1	rhp51	phk3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388644445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775276	2543580	2538861	279995	275441	SPAC644.14c	SPCC1620.11	rad51	nup97	rhp51	mug87	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323167595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775277	2543580	2543277	279995	279705	SPAC644.14c	SPAC1002.03c	rad51	gls2	rhp51	gls2alpha	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382522407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775278	2543580	2540766	279995	277286	SPAC644.14c	SPBC19C2.02	rad51	pmt1	rhp51	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03731627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775279	2543580	2543076	279995	279509	SPAC644.14c	SPAC30C2.07	rad51	SPAC30C2.07	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.915919054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775280	2543580	2542566	279995	279022	SPAC644.14c	SPAC8C9.12c	rad51	SPAC8C9.12c	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702903123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775281	2543580	2540360	279995	276889	SPAC644.14c	SPBC2G5.01	rad51	SPBC2G5.01	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.481876477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775282	2543580	2543372	279995	279794	SPAC644.14c	SPAPB1A10.09	rad51	ase1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.502837267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775283	2543580	2542460	279995	278921	SPAC644.14c	SPAC1F12.03c	rad51	SPAC1F12.03c	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329470183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775284	2543580	2542094	279995	278571	SPAC644.14c	SPAC29B12.06c	rad51	rcd1	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.877094026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775285	2543580	2540208	279995	276741	SPAC644.14c	SPBC9B6.03	rad51	SPBC9B6.03	rhp51	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262862548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775286	2543580	2540736	279995	277259	SPAC644.14c	SPBC19F8.02	rad51	SPBC19F8.02	rhp51	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517786279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775287	2541713	2542207	278208	278682	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC17H9.10c	atp11	ddb1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.266716098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775288	2541713	2543497	278208	279916	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC926.09c	atp11	fas1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09796998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775289	2541713	2541902	278208	278392	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC27E2.07	atp11	pvg2	-	mug53	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.546138243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775290	2541713	2538721	278208	275305	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC1494.10	atp11	adn3	-	SPCC70.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.264582038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775291	2541713	2542577	278208	279033	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC19G12.15c	atp11	tpp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.0001142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775292	2541713	2542723	278208	279174	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC25H1.03	atp11	atg101	-	mug66	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.230667485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775293	2541713	2542291	278208	278759	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC17C9.08	atp11	pnu1	-	end1|nuc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.557918258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775294	2541713	2542518	278208	278976	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC1B3.16c	atp11	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.628620796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775295	2541713	2541343	278208	277854	SPAC3A12.12	SPBPB2B2.19c	atp11	SPBPB2B2.19c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992054724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775296	2541713	2540913	278208	277429	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC56F2.08c	atp11	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.710936388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775297	2541713	2542372	278208	278836	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC1F3.03	atp11	SPAC1F3.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325826204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775298	2541713	2543152	278208	279584	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC869.03c	atp11	SPAC869.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981481782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775299	2541713	2539452	278208	276015	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC70.03c	atp11	SPCC70.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.377679935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775300	2541713	2543414	278208	279836	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC630.10	atp11	SPAC630.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.046379023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775301	2541713	2542127	278208	278603	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC1952.12c	atp11	csn71	-	csn7|csn7a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.162284364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775302	2541713	2540131	278208	276668	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC1778.05c	atp11	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149072274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775303	2541713	2542358	278208	278823	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC1782.09c	atp11	clp1	-	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.622305526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775304	2541713	2542378	278208	278842	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC1805.04	atp11	nup132	-	Nup133b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.363528278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775305	2541713	2539282	278208	275850	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC622.06c	atp11	SPCC622.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504210466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775306	2541713	2541167	278208	277682	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC691.05c	atp11	SPBC691.05c	-	pi030|SPACTOKYO_453.04|SPBP22H7.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.207020741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775307	2541713	2539930	278208	276474	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC1198.11c	atp11	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.398642316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775308	2541713	2541438	278208	277943	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC23G3.10c	atp11	ssr3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.332620808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775309	2541713	2540099	278208	276637	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC16H5.11c	atp11	skb1	-	rmt5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.226821217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775310	2541713	2539068	278208	275640	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC1442.11c	atp11	SPCC1442.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808810852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775311	2541713	2542650	278208	279104	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC2C4.10c	atp11	csc4	-	SPAC2C4.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145459643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775312	2541713	2540296	278208	276827	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC2D10.05	atp11	exg3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807892022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775313	2541713	2541188	278208	277702	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC83.16c	atp11	SPBC83.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877829372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775314	2541713	5802967	278208	858105	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC20G4.08	atp11	pdc1	-	SPAC20G4.08|SPAC4F10.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.97429185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775315	2541713	2539890	278208	276436	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC16C6.03c	atp11	SPBC16C6.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819062117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775316	2541713	2542392	278208	278856	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC19D5.02c	atp11	SPAC19D5.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.900803974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775317	2541713	2542613	278208	279067	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC18B11.03c	atp11	SPAC18B11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453859432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775318	2541713	2540664	278208	277189	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC215.02	atp11	bob1	-	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.246104762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775319	2541713	2538806	278208	275387	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC1840.09	atp11	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.233106568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775320	2541713	2541286	278208	277799	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC9B6.11c	atp11	SPBC9B6.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927538926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775321	2541713	2538976	278208	275550	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC1840.04	atp11	pca1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195675536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775322	2541713	2540999	278208	277515	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC4B4.04	atp11	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.122635363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775323	2541713	2538847	278208	275428	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC594.06c	atp11	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.71174017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775324	2541713	2542273	278208	278742	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC17H9.13c	atp11	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819205292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775325	2541713	2538775	278208	275357	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC23B6.05c	atp11	ssb3	-	rpa3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.851777277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775326	2541713	2539510	278208	276072	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC4G3.04c	atp11	coq5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.625562793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775327	2541713	2542816	278208	279263	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC4G8.11c	atp11	atp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578051501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775328	2541713	2539913	278208	276457	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC11G11.03	atp11	mrt4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.564220667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775329	2541713	2541682	278208	278178	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC15F9.02	atp11	seh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324349218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775330	2541713	2539564	278208	276125	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC550.12	atp11	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.593645138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775331	2541713	2539463	278208	276026	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC550.11	atp11	SPCC550.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039531264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775332	2541713	2538801	278208	275382	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC285.13c	atp11	nup60	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.30581795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775333	2541713	2541964	278208	278450	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC2F3.08	atp11	sut1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.559826551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775334	2541713	2542555	278208	279012	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC1952.06c	atp11	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.512473244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775335	2541713	2540095	278208	276633	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC115.03	atp11	SPBC115.03	-	SPBC839.18c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.100387549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775336	2541713	2539797	278208	276347	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC16G5.14c	atp11	rps3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048348665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775337	2541713	2539064	278208	275636	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC126.06	atp11	twf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.180094884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775338	2541713	2539937	278208	276481	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC1539.08	atp11	arf6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.751560142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775339	2541713	2540463	278208	276991	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC2F12.15c	atp11	pfa3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.407410101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775340	2541713	2541323	278208	277835	SPAC3A12.12	SPBP35G2.14	atp11	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.021150953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775341	2541713	2542023	278208	278506	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC20H4.10	atp11	ufd2	-	SPAC145.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647151951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775342	2541713	2539792	278208	276342	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC1271.14	atp11	SPBC1271.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.40119331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775343	2541713	2540467	278208	276995	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC2G2.07c	atp11	mug178	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.401704358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775344	2541713	2541597	278208	278094	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC29E6.09	atp11	SPAC29E6.09	-	SPAC30.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.739750412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775345	2541713	2539129	278208	275701	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC338.14	atp11	ado1	-	SPCC338.14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.335984414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775346	2541713	2543641	278208	280055	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC3H5.08c	atp11	SPAC3H5.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.945839622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775347	2541713	2539244	278208	275814	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC1672.06c	atp11	asp1	-	vip1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.817375234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775348	2541713	2542082	278208	278559	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC29B12.10c	atp11	pgt1	-	opt1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932236962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775349	2541713	2543426	278208	279846	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC631.02	atp11	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.819991749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775350	2541713	2539100	278208	275672	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC330.12c	atp11	sdh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385154768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775351	2541713	2540415	278208	276943	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC30B4.06c	atp11	SPBC30B4.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.327062086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775352	2541713	2541663	278208	278159	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC22G7.08	atp11	ppk8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.092212291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775353	2541713	2541301	278208	277813	SPAC3A12.12	SPBP23A10.05	atp11	ssr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712487873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775354	2541713	2539478	278208	276041	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC550.07	atp11	SPCC550.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039282999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775355	2541713	2540964	278208	277480	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC365.16	atp11	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.210073435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775356	2541713	2539960	278208	276504	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC15D4.15	atp11	pho2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.457212481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775357	2541713	2539023	278208	275596	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC594.05c	atp11	spf1	-	spp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.845630684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775358	2541713	2541544	278208	278044	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC22G7.06c	atp11	ura1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57504136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775359	2541713	2539388	278208	275953	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC24B10.12	atp11	cgi121	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.807284355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775360	2541713	3361461	278208	280537	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC11H11.01	atp11	sst6	-	cps23	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.561695784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775361	2541713	2538876	278208	275455	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC4B3.02c	atp11	SPCC4B3.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262688429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775362	2541713	2539051	278208	275624	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC1183.11	atp11	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927561713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775363	2541713	2542950	278208	279390	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC12B10.03	atp11	bun62	-	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.743448661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775364	2541713	2541664	278208	278160	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC2H10.01	atp11	SPAC2H10.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516774697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775365	2541713	2538821	278208	275402	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC584.01c	atp11	SPCC584.01c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992335987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775366	2541713	2540797	278208	277316	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC18H10.11c	atp11	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77575052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775367	2541713	2542964	278208	279404	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC12G12.07c	atp11	SPAC12G12.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.199342535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775368	2541713	2541801	278208	278292	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC2F7.08c	atp11	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.74396322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775369	2541713	2538715	278208	275299	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC1223.05c	atp11	rpl3702	-	rpl37|rpl37-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.134197678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775370	2541713	2540894	278208	277410	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC530.04	atp11	mod5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378016933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775371	2541713	2541776	278208	278270	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC23H3.05c	atp11	swd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.403165583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775372	2541713	2541545	278208	278045	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC22F8.07c	atp11	rtf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877498645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775373	2541713	2542652	278208	279106	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC1687.15	atp11	gsk3	-	skp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.101554767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775374	2541713	2541160	278208	277675	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC725.09c	atp11	hob3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.333779282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775375	2541713	2540338	278208	276867	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC2G2.13c	atp11	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.926935327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775376	2541713	2540922	278208	277438	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC36.10	atp11	SPBC36.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.912472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775377	2541713	2538706	278208	275290	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC338.08	atp11	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.514351298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775378	2541713	2540987	278208	277503	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC36B7.05c	atp11	SPBC36B7.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318716086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775379	2541713	2540352	278208	276881	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC215.03c	atp11	csn1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.39847631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775380	2541713	2538789	278208	275370	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC338.04	atp11	cid2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.411398021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775381	2541713	2540396	278208	276924	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC31F10.12	atp11	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.022556258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775382	2541713	2540673	278208	277198	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC1D7.03	atp11	mug80	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.463348007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775383	2541713	2541192	278208	277706	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC83.17	atp11	SPBC83.17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979963697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775384	2541713	2539394	278208	275959	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC1620.13	atp11	SPCC1620.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.316868001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775385	2541713	2541578	278208	278075	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC25B8.05	atp11	deg1	-	SPAC25B8.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.40823819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775386	2541713	2541435	278208	277940	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC2E1P5.02c	atp11	mug109	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810239511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775387	2541713	2539484	278208	276047	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC594.04c	atp11	SPCC594.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.557778463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775388	2541713	2542873	278208	279318	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC9G1.02	atp11	wis4	-	wak1|wik1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.314370018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775389	2541713	2539454	278208	276017	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC622.15c	atp11	SPCC622.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640748609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775390	2541713	2539999	278208	276543	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC1734.15	atp11	rsc4	-	brd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.943165472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775391	2541713	2541166	278208	277681	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC725.15	atp11	ura5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0364274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775392	2541713	2543363	278208	279785	SPAC3A12.12	SPAPB24D3.09c	atp11	pdr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704673892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775393	2541713	2539603	278208	276161	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC1289.06c	atp11	ppr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.608463331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775394	2541713	2539689	278208	276244	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC1861.03	atp11	mak10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200800998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775395	2541713	2538871	278208	275450	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC1259.14c	atp11	meu27	-	B8647-6	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913903282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775396	2541713	2541413	278208	277921	SPAC3A12.12	SPBPJ4664.06	atp11	gpt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097470953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775397	2541713	2543643	278208	280057	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC3G9.07c	atp11	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.381904748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775398	2541713	2541899	278208	278389	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC22E12.11c	atp11	set3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.23919009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775399	2541713	2541739	278208	278233	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC2G11.10c	atp11	SPAC2G11.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.805908618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775400	2541713	2540538	278208	277065	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC26H8.03	atp11	cho2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.273815217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775401	2541713	2541187	278208	277701	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC776.14	atp11	plh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.997619044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775402	2541713	2542861	278208	279307	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC13G7.13c	atp11	msa1	-	SPAC6C3.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.078386906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775403	2541713	2542126	278208	278602	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC1B3.05	atp11	not3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.869770813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775404	2541713	2540194	278208	276727	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC1709.09	atp11	rrf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928343191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775405	2541713	2542007	278208	278490	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC20H4.07	atp11	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.816487643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775406	2541713	2543244	278208	279672	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC6B12.06c	atp11	rrg9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.275142197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775407	2541713	2541828	278208	278319	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC22H12.05c	atp11	fsc1	-	SPAC22H12.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.509074067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775408	2541713	2540256	278208	276787	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC32F12.12c	atp11	SPBC32F12.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101414645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775409	2541713	2543367	278208	279789	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC3H1.10	atp11	pcs2	-	SPAC3H1.10|pcs	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.055947217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775410	2541713	2540751	278208	277273	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC20F10.10	atp11	psl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.672910015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775411	2541713	2540943	278208	277459	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC36B7.02	atp11	SPBC36B7.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329742721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775412	2541713	2539850	278208	276398	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC15D4.07c	atp11	atg9	-	apg9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.206494806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775413	2541713	2538849	278208	275430	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC330.14c	atp11	rpl2402	-	rpl24-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877221093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775414	2541713	2541903	278208	278393	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC22F8.05	atp11	SPAC22F8.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.192428676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775415	2541713	2538841	278208	275422	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC550.03c	atp11	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.335163835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775416	2541713	2539232	278208	275802	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC1223.04c	atp11	set11	-	mug76	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.480868419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775417	2541713	2542549	278208	279006	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC19A8.11c	atp11	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.419546082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775418	2541713	2542519	278208	278977	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC19G12.08	atp11	scs7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.790436288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775419	2541713	2541009	278208	277524	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC428.04	atp11	apq12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.28683648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775420	2541713	5802861	278208	857999	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC1D4.01	atp11	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.047861109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775421	2541713	2539953	278208	276497	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC1709.11c	atp11	png2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.835053078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775422	2541713	2542813	278208	279260	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC29B12.11c	atp11	SPAC29B12.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811892265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775423	2541713	2540990	278208	277506	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC36B7.06c	atp11	mug20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.903481985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775424	2541713	2541389	278208	277900	SPAC3A12.12	SPBPB2B2.09c	atp11	SPBPB2B2.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.186639269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775425	2541713	2539368	278208	275934	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC16A11.07	atp11	coq10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.679387926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775426	2541713	2542720	278208	279171	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC25G10.05c	atp11	his1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19877053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775427	2541713	2539348	278208	275914	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC18B5.07c	atp11	nup61	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049609363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775428	2541713	2541142	278208	277657	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC725.04	atp11	SPBC725.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.329537158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775429	2541713	2538780	278208	275361	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC1840.07c	atp11	SPCC1840.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870611147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775430	2541713	2543307	278208	279731	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC694.05c	atp11	rps2502	-	rps25|rps25-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87699846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775431	2541713	2539847	278208	276395	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC530.14c	atp11	dsk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.155097786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775432	2541713	2540184	278208	276717	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC106.12c	atp11	SPBC106.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101319069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775433	2541713	2541395	278208	277904	SPAC3A12.12	SPBP8B7.25	atp11	cyp4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.884025924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775434	2541713	2543315	278208	279739	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC6B12.07c	atp11	SPAC6B12.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380176475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775435	2541713	2541296	278208	277808	SPAC3A12.12	SPBP8B7.06	atp11	rpp201	-	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200857209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775436	2541713	2538690	278208	275275	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC1393.05	atp11	ers1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.175575713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775437	2541713	2540229	278208	276761	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC31F10.15c	atp11	atp15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.144213222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775438	2541713	2542060	278208	278538	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC23C11.14	atp11	zhf1	-	zhf	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.430578307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775439	2541713	2538884	278208	275462	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC1393.08	atp11	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.054956847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775440	2541713	2539213	278208	275783	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC285.10c	atp11	SPCC285.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153980242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775441	2541713	2541488	278208	277990	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC227.17c	atp11	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.615781357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775442	2541713	2541746	278208	278240	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC20G4.04c	atp11	hus1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.894953854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775443	2541713	2543049	278208	279484	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC1296.04	atp11	mug65	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.064103349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775444	2541713	2540193	278208	276726	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC1289.10c	atp11	adn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.691036569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775445	2541713	2541337	278208	277848	SPAC3A12.12	SPBP35G2.13c	atp11	swc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.713851988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775446	2541713	2541378	278208	277889	SPAC3A12.12	SPBP8B7.21	atp11	ubp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.073810132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775447	2541713	2539595	278208	276153	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC965.14c	atp11	SPCC965.14c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039566623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775448	2541713	2539538	278208	276100	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC364.06	atp11	nap1	-	nap11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.894382609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775449	2541713	2539763	278208	276314	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC1861.05	atp11	SPBC1861.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.563250685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775450	2541713	2542283	278208	278751	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC27F1.08	atp11	pdt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.666161613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775451	2541713	2543113	278208	279545	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC3F10.07c	atp11	erf4	-	mug91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.534130334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775452	2541713	2538907	278208	275484	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC24B10.19c	atp11	nts1	-	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.465706519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775453	2541713	2539160	278208	275732	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC18.17c	atp11	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983167916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775454	2541713	2541786	278208	278278	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC22F3.08c	atp11	rok1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4486222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775455	2541713	2543391	278208	279813	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC4G9.09c	atp11	arg11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.244540005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775456	2541713	2543332	278208	279755	SPAC3A12.12	SPAPB8E5.04c	atp11	SPAPB8E5.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.55718074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775457	2541713	2541156	278208	277671	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC685.07c	atp11	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.045701097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775458	2541713	2538762	278208	275345	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC306.04c	atp11	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.232956615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775459	2541713	2543628	278208	280042	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC3H8.10	atp11	spo20	-	sec14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.921843668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775460	2541713	2543051	278208	279486	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC1071.08	atp11	rpp203	-	rla6|rpp2-3|rpa2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.767121281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775461	2541713	2540519	278208	277047	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC21C3.14c	atp11	SPBC21C3.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256418378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775462	2541713	2539082	278208	275654	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC126.03	atp11	pus1	-	lps1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.30428484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775463	2541713	2542327	278208	278793	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC16C9.06c	atp11	upf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.191413618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775464	2541713	2543106	278208	279538	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC3A11.13	atp11	SPAC3A11.13	-	SPAC3H5.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.859568407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775465	2541713	2539137	278208	275709	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC1682.08c	atp11	mcp2	-	SPCC1682.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807621699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775466	2541713	2539108	278208	275680	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC1223.02	atp11	nmt1	-	thi3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.410743764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775467	2541713	2542881	278208	279326	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC13F5.03c	atp11	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852945253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775468	2541713	2540800	278208	277319	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC409.20c	atp11	psh3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865777218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775469	2541713	2543304	278208	279728	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC6B12.12	atp11	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.843182988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775470	2541713	2540998	278208	277514	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC3D6.05	atp11	ptp4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864443039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775471	2541713	2541103	278208	277618	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC651.06	atp11	mug166	-	csa1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448499938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775472	2541713	2540089	278208	276627	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC32H8.01c	atp11	SPBC32H8.01c	-	SPBP22H7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780712972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775473	2541713	2541425	278208	277930	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC2C4.17c	atp11	msy2	-	SPAC2C4.17c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.84297937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775474	2541713	2540725	278208	277248	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC215.14c	atp11	vps20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090582873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775475	2541713	2540346	278208	276875	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC2F12.03c	atp11	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.248841423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775476	2541713	2542355	278208	278820	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC29A4.13	atp11	SPAC29A4.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04682568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775477	2541713	2539013	278208	275586	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC364.03	atp11	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.764738612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775478	2541713	2540699	278208	277223	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC800.08	atp11	gcd10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.768704758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775479	2541713	2539136	278208	275708	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC1919.05	atp11	SPCC1919.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989960453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775480	2541713	2539318	278208	275884	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC1919.07	atp11	SPCC1919.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.323796251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775481	2541713	2541860	278208	278350	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC22F3.02	atp11	atf31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.912656755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775482	2541713	2543128	278208	279560	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC3F10.06c	atp11	rit1	-	SPAC3F10.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.545045073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775483	2541713	2543377	278208	279799	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC3H1.07	atp11	aru1	-	car3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634068935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775484	2541713	2540677	278208	277202	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC21B10.03c	atp11	ath1	-	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.985936444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775485	2541713	2542326	278208	278792	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC16C9.07	atp11	pom2	-	SPAC2G11.01|mug189|ppk5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.192124075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775486	2541713	2539729	278208	276281	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC11B10.07c	atp11	ivn1	-	pi004|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039707581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775487	2541713	2543091	278208	279524	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC12G12.15	atp11	sif3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.122113794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775488	2541713	2542222	278208	278695	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC31G5.18c	atp11	sde2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262751496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775489	2541713	2543228	278208	279656	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC6B12.04c	atp11	SPAC6B12.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514564698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775490	2541713	2539668	278208	276223	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC11B10.10c	atp11	pht1	-	pi001	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.963668305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775491	2541713	2540516	278208	277044	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC21C3.01c	atp11	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640068983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775492	2541713	2540297	278208	276828	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC24C6.08c	atp11	bhd1	-	bhd	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.46265649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775493	2541713	2542628	278208	279082	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC24H6.06	atp11	sld3	-	mug175	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.278512973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775494	2541713	2540555	278208	277082	SPAC3A12.12	SPBP16F5.02	atp11	mcs2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.083469508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775495	2541713	2542250	278208	278720	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC17D4.03c	atp11	cis4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040268485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775496	2541713	2542309	278208	278775	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC16A10.02	atp11	sub1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985936964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775497	2541713	2541757	278208	278251	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC2F7.10	atp11	akr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.08080144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775498	2541713	2539170	278208	275741	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC306.02c	atp11	SPCC306.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990744973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775499	2541713	2539205	278208	275775	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC4B3.15	atp11	mid1	-	dmf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.433597244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775500	2541713	3361117	278208	280193	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC663.17	atp11	wtf15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039960711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775501	2541713	2542607	278208	279061	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC18B11.02c	atp11	SPAC18B11.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387120952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775502	2541713	2539375	278208	275941	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC4G3.11	atp11	mug154	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.248151822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775503	2541713	2540551	278208	277078	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC23E6.01c	atp11	cxr1	-	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.589564381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775504	2541713	2543380	278208	279802	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC4G9.16c	atp11	rpl901	-	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513155417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775505	2541713	2539189	278208	275760	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC1682.16	atp11	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818640057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775506	2541713	2543486	278208	279906	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC959.07	atp11	rps403	-	rps4|rps4-3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.233894788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775507	2541713	2542119	278208	278595	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC1834.08	atp11	mak1	-	phk3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.84611996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775508	2541713	3361410	278208	280486	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC1527.01	atp11	mok11	-	SPAC23D3.15	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508197037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775509	2541713	2541238	278208	277752	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC8E4.05c	atp11	SPBC8E4.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.459035973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775510	2541713	2542716	278208	279169	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC25H1.07	atp11	emc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.748304274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775511	2541713	2541806	278208	278297	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC4G8.13c	atp11	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.559410582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775512	2541713	2543327	278208	279750	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC1D4.06c	atp11	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517751611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775513	2541713	2542159	278208	278635	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC1834.09	atp11	mug51	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.773355484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775514	2541713	2542886	278208	279331	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC1486.01	atp11	SPAC1486.01	-	sod2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.90736565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775515	2541713	2539531	278208	276093	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC576.02	atp11	SPCC576.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.648101641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775516	2541713	2543087	278208	279520	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC30C2.04	atp11	SPAC30C2.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.080707901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775517	2541713	2543076	278208	279509	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC30C2.07	atp11	SPAC30C2.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.479967254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775518	2541713	2541778	278208	278271	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC23G3.05c	atp11	SPAC23G3.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.911325217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775519	2541713	2540828	278208	277346	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC4B4.06	atp11	vps25	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.071888532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775520	2541713	2539768	278208	276319	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC1703.09	atp11	SPBC1703.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.203246196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775521	2541713	2542795	278208	279243	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC9G1.05	atp11	aip1	-	SPAC9G1.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.012392785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775522	2541713	2538920	278208	275497	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC1840.05c	atp11	SPCC1840.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.515749753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775523	2541713	2539588	278208	276146	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC962.04	atp11	rps1201	-	rps12|rps12-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871610244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775524	2541713	2540165	278208	276700	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC1683.02	atp11	SPBC1683.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.053575861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775525	2541713	2543333	278208	279756	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC694.02	atp11	SPAC694.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.504884366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775526	2541713	2538834	278208	275415	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC126.08c	atp11	SPCC126.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.567523081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775527	2541713	2540372	278208	276901	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC31F10.03	atp11	SPBC31F10.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.37607581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775528	2541713	2542440	278208	278902	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC17A2.12	atp11	rrp1	-	SPAC17A2.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.020227386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775529	2541713	3361295	278208	280371	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC1921.01c	atp11	rpl35b	-	rpl37|rpl37-1|rpl3701|SPBC29C10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.552251533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775530	2541713	2543472	278208	279892	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC959.04c	atp11	omh6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819547983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775531	2541713	2540208	278208	276741	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC9B6.03	atp11	SPBC9B6.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.82099652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775532	2541713	2542617	278208	279071	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC13A11.01c	atp11	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.866151069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775533	2541713	2541228	278208	277742	SPAC3A12.12	SPBP16F5.08c	atp11	SPBP16F5.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.000542565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775534	2541713	2540320	278208	276850	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC3D6.04c	atp11	mad1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046260415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775535	2541713	2538940	278208	275515	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC1620.07c	atp11	lnp1	-	SPCC1620.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040163508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775536	2541713	2541875	278208	278365	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC22F3.06c	atp11	lon1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.556191849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775537	2541713	2540787	278208	277306	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC1921.07c	atp11	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.663922016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775538	2541713	2540798	278208	277317	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC19C7.01	atp11	mni1	-	SPBC32F12.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.021028633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775539	2541713	2542609	278208	279063	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC31G5.04	atp11	lys12	-	SPAC31G5.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.021597575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775540	3361558	2542207	280634	278682	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC17H9.10c	dad3	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.483449435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775541	3361558	2539050	280634	275623	SPAC14C4.16	SPCC11E10.08	dad3	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.977144027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775542	3361558	2540060	280634	276598	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC106.01	dad3	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.434482314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775543	3361558	2540105	280634	276642	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC106.04	dad3	ada1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049014515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775544	3361558	2542066	280634	278543	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC227.05	dad3	SPAC227.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.370489169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775545	3361558	2542787	280634	279236	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC9G1.08c	dad3	SPAC9G1.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.983721558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775546	3361558	2542378	280634	278842	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC1805.04	dad3	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.648393669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775547	3361558	2540528	280634	277056	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC18H10.04c	dad3	sce3	-	tif48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.928929159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775548	3361558	2542237	280634	278709	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC19E9.02	dad3	fin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.184764755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775549	3361558	2539930	280634	276474	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC1198.11c	dad3	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515132895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775550	3361558	2541853	280634	278344	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC2F3.11	dad3	SPAC2F3.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258170705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775551	3361558	2541856	280634	278347	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC23H3.08c	dad3	bub3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.333448307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775552	3361558	2540161	280634	276696	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC13E7.03c	dad3	SPBC13E7.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.273184458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775553	3361558	2540694	280634	277218	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC19C7.10	dad3	bqt4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639059486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775554	3361558	2539309	280634	275876	SPAC14C4.16	SPCC4G3.19	dad3	alp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.133971646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775555	3361558	2540664	280634	277189	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC215.02	dad3	bob1	-	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.24120572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775556	3361558	3361436	280634	280512	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC1296.01c	dad3	SPAC1296.01c	-	SPAC22F3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.120798911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775557	3361558	2543320	280634	279744	SPAC14C4.16	SPAPJ695.01c	dad3	SPAPJ695.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512472275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775558	3361558	2539420	280634	275985	SPAC14C4.16	SPCC970.07c	dad3	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578482963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775559	3361558	2541200	280634	277714	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC8D2.03c	dad3	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.972270998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775560	3361558	2542468	280634	278929	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC1D4.09c	dad3	rtf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.152394242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775561	3361558	2542107	280634	278583	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC30.01c	dad3	sec72	-	sec7b|sec702	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.997176185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775562	3361558	2541208	280634	277722	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC887.04c	dad3	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.931531127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775563	3361558	2538847	280634	275428	SPAC14C4.16	SPCC594.06c	dad3	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.830685709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775564	3361558	2541471	280634	277973	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC1F5.03c	dad3	SPAC1F5.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.628634863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775565	3361558	2543579	280634	279994	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC9.11	dad3	SPAC9.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.475454275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775566	3361558	2539463	280634	276026	SPAC14C4.16	SPCC550.11	dad3	SPCC550.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.179015295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775567	3361558	2539434	280634	275997	SPAC14C4.16	SPCC757.09c	dad3	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.408900518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775568	3361558	2541026	280634	277541	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC337.09	dad3	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.203065953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775569	3361558	2539314	280634	275880	SPAC14C4.16	SPCC548.05c	dad3	dbl5	-	SPCC548.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.315705509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775570	3361558	2540463	280634	276991	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC2F12.15c	dad3	pfa3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.58645584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775571	3361558	2540425	280634	276953	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC27.06c	dad3	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.196809472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775572	3361558	2541424	280634	277929	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC23G3.04	dad3	ies4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.393689759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775573	3361558	2542318	280634	278784	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC16C9.05	dad3	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.928276628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775574	3361558	2541560	280634	278059	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC24B11.12c	dad3	SPAC24B11.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.572083018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775575	3361558	2542277	280634	278746	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC17A5.02c	dad3	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.485352704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775576	3361558	2541580	280634	278077	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC1687.05	dad3	pli1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.007618406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775577	3361558	2543108	280634	279540	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC3A12.13c	dad3	SPAC3A12.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.910987048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775578	3361558	2539244	280634	275814	SPAC14C4.16	SPCC1672.06c	dad3	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.057725642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775579	3361558	2543563	280634	279979	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC664.02c	dad3	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.529099913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775580	3361558	2543426	280634	279846	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC631.02	dad3	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.562090063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775581	3361558	2543078	280634	279511	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC31A2.15c	dad3	dcc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.905268612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775582	3361558	2538906	280634	275483	SPAC14C4.16	SPCC1259.03	dad3	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.068705727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775583	3361558	2540825	280634	277343	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC428.08c	dad3	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.284450499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775584	3361558	2541021	280634	277536	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC3B8.10c	dad3	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.614894112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775585	3361558	2542268	280634	278737	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC17A5.07c	dad3	ulp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.680087371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775586	3361558	2542036	280634	278518	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC23A1.19c	dad3	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.759579934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775587	3361558	2539467	280634	276030	SPAC14C4.16	SPCC417.07c	dad3	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.313650817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775588	3361558	2541885	280634	278375	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC22H10.03c	dad3	kap114	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.271296883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775589	3361558	2538821	280634	275402	SPAC14C4.16	SPCC584.01c	dad3	SPCC584.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771266872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775590	3361558	2540631	280634	277157	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC25B2.10	dad3	SPBC25B2.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.716174641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775591	3361558	2541776	280634	278270	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC23H3.05c	dad3	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318756502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775592	3361558	2542123	280634	278599	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC18G6.15	dad3	mal3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.064735365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775593	3361558	2538706	280634	275290	SPAC14C4.16	SPCC338.08	dad3	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.691272547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775594	3361558	2540352	280634	276881	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC215.03c	dad3	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.3810236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775595	3361558	2540396	280634	276924	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC31F10.12	dad3	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.537377103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775596	3361558	2538800	280634	275381	SPAC14C4.16	SPCC1322.06	dad3	kap113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.54728808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775597	3361558	2539219	280634	275789	SPAC14C4.16	SPCC1795.01c	dad3	mad3	-	SPCC895.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.240935744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775598	3361558	2539484	280634	276047	SPAC14C4.16	SPCC594.04c	dad3	SPCC594.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.069921845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775599	3361558	2543667	280634	280081	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC4H3.02c	dad3	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.000797015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775600	3361558	2539689	280634	276244	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC1861.03	dad3	mak10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452954134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775601	3361558	2539857	280634	276404	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC1604.20c	dad3	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.524686839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775602	3361558	2541532	280634	278032	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC2C4.15c	dad3	ubx2	-	ucp13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.853944002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775603	3361558	2543643	280634	280057	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC3G9.07c	dad3	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.318406574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775604	3361558	2540231	280634	276763	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC336.14c	dad3	ppk26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.352986723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775605	3361558	2541710	280634	278205	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC343.11c	dad3	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.269047214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775606	3361558	2539667	280634	276222	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC13G1.08c	dad3	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.377867218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775607	3361558	2542007	280634	278490	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC20H4.07	dad3	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.036635432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775608	3361558	2543244	280634	279672	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC6B12.06c	dad3	rrg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.483790232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775609	3361558	2540751	280634	277273	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC20F10.10	dad3	psl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.157171024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775610	3361558	2543378	280634	279800	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC3H8.07c	dad3	pac10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.496515168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775611	3361558	2539408	280634	275973	SPAC14C4.16	SPCC576.12c	dad3	mhf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.835814083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775612	3361558	2542519	280634	278977	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC19G12.08	dad3	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321864597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775613	3361558	2541009	280634	277524	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC428.04	dad3	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.511103707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775614	3361558	5802861	280634	857999	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC1D4.01	dad3	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197456544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775615	3361558	2539119	280634	275691	SPAC14C4.16	SPCC1223.13	dad3	cbf12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.46047472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775616	3361558	2543443	280634	279863	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC3H1.12c	dad3	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.50121209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775617	3361558	2541389	280634	277900	SPAC14C4.16	SPBPB2B2.09c	dad3	SPBPB2B2.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.621897596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775618	3361558	2541536	280634	278036	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC1071.02	dad3	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.498771796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775619	3361558	2541464	280634	277966	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC222.08c	dad3	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.91034273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775620	3361558	2543307	280634	279731	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC694.05c	dad3	rps2502	-	rps25|rps25-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.445672076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775621	3361558	2539847	280634	276395	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC530.14c	dad3	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.929296839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775622	3361558	2540599	280634	277125	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC29A3.10c	dad3	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.382979833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775623	3361558	3361470	280634	280546	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC3G9.01	dad3	nsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.571480524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775624	3361558	2541488	280634	277990	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC227.17c	dad3	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.091559152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775625	3361558	2540193	280634	276726	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC1289.10c	dad3	adn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.889925914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775626	3361558	2541337	280634	277848	SPAC14C4.16	SPBP35G2.13c	dad3	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.757501012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775627	3361558	2539527	280634	276089	SPAC14C4.16	SPCC338.16	dad3	pof3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.166476407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775628	3361558	2539519	280634	276081	SPAC14C4.16	SPCC364.05	dad3	vps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637183922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775629	3361558	2540589	280634	277115	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC20F10.06	dad3	mad2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.103646469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775630	3361558	2538848	280634	275429	SPAC14C4.16	SPCC613.12c	dad3	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.260645645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775631	3361558	3361520	280634	280596	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC1610.02c	dad3	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.553409663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775632	3361558	2539908	280634	276454	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC13E7.06	dad3	msd1	-	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.283144349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775633	3361558	2539686	280634	276241	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC1734.06	dad3	rhp18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.92407901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775634	3361558	2539160	280634	275732	SPAC14C4.16	SPCC18.17c	dad3	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.010885059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775635	3361558	2538762	280634	275345	SPAC14C4.16	SPCC306.04c	dad3	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.200499778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775636	3361558	2543628	280634	280042	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC3H8.10	dad3	spo20	-	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.353158192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775637	3361558	2543106	280634	279538	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC3A11.13	dad3	SPAC3A11.13	-	SPAC3H5.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.574938106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775638	3361558	2541909	280634	278399	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC227.01c	dad3	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.058608878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775639	3361558	2540498	280634	277026	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC27.02c	dad3	ask1	-	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.210610581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775640	3361558	2542881	280634	279326	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC13F5.03c	dad3	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.525973141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775641	3361558	2543304	280634	279728	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC6B12.12	dad3	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.562764057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775642	3361558	2538966	280634	275540	SPAC14C4.16	SPCC18.10	dad3	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.487538147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775643	3361558	2540998	280634	277514	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC3D6.05	dad3	ptp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.717328566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775644	3361558	2540960	280634	277476	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC3D6.02	dad3	but2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384255132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775645	3361558	2540089	280634	276627	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC32H8.01c	dad3	SPBC32H8.01c	-	SPBP22H7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.399094563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775646	3361558	2540725	280634	277248	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC215.14c	dad3	vps20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.786264047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775647	3361558	2541531	280634	278031	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC25A8.01c	dad3	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.022579866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775648	3361558	2541678	280634	278174	SPAC14C4.16	SPAP7G5.05	dad3	rpl1002	-	rpl10|rpl10-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385442458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775649	3361558	2542418	280634	278881	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC1805.07c	dad3	dad2	-	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.99399401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775650	3361558	2542826	280634	279273	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC13G6.09	dad3	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.961645611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775651	3361558	2539668	280634	276223	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC11B10.10c	dad3	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.487273894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775652	3361558	2540516	280634	277044	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC21C3.01c	dad3	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.266863821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775653	3361558	2540927	280634	277443	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC365.06	dad3	pmt3	-	smt3|ubl2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.192750843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775654	3361558	2543633	280634	280047	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC3H8.05c	dad3	mms1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.413385438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775655	3361558	2539702	280634	276255	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC1604.12	dad3	SPBC1604.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.498203124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775656	3361558	2539726	280634	276278	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC13E7.08c	dad3	leo1	-	SPBC13E7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770022564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775657	3361558	2540551	280634	277078	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC23E6.01c	dad3	cxr1	-	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38623088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775658	3361558	2538840	280634	275421	SPAC14C4.16	SPCC736.07c	dad3	SPCC736.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.023276981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775659	3361558	2539189	280634	275760	SPAC14C4.16	SPCC1682.16	dad3	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.125960598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775660	3361558	2542021	280634	278504	SPAC14C4.16	SPAP14E8.02	dad3	tos4	-	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.46862557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775661	3361558	2538792	280634	275373	SPAC14C4.16	SPCP1E11.10	dad3	SPCP1E11.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.329186851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775662	3361558	2542716	280634	279169	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC25H1.07	dad3	emc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.884769139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775663	3361558	2543384	280634	279806	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC637.06	dad3	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.615858192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775664	3361558	2543387	280634	279809	SPAC14C4.16	SPAPB1E7.02c	dad3	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.03394453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775665	3361558	2542424	280634	278886	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC1805.14	dad3	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.283797801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775666	3361558	2541478	280634	277980	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC2F7.17	dad3	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.115833065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775667	3361558	2542656	280634	279110	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC2E1P3.05c	dad3	SPAC2E1P3.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.675263502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775668	3361558	2541272	280634	277786	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC947.03c	dad3	naa38	-	mak31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.139089146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775669	3361558	2541297	280634	277809	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC9B6.07	dad3	nop52	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.983814868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775670	3361558	2542617	280634	279071	SPAC14C4.16	SPAC13A11.01c	dad3	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.386826729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775671	3361558	2540649	280634	277174	SPAC14C4.16	SPBC19F8.08	dad3	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9482576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775672	2542220	2542577	278694	279033	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC19G12.15c	SPAC1A6.03c	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.757894132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775673	2542220	2540105	278694	276642	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC106.04	SPAC1A6.03c	ada1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.707354697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775674	2542220	2543617	278694	280031	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC4A8.10	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC4A8.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378695745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775675	2542220	2541913	278694	278403	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC227.04	SPAC1A6.03c	atg10	-	SPAC227.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.444688388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775676	2542220	2541426	278694	277931	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC227.06	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC227.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808567805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775677	2542220	2542706	278694	279159	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC29B12.13	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC29B12.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.515883894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775678	2542220	2541117	278694	277632	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC646.13	SPAC1A6.03c	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.807987668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775679	2542220	2541188	278694	277702	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC83.16c	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC83.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.057076905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775680	2542220	2541345	278694	277856	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBP35G2.07	SPAC1A6.03c	ilv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.75227239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775681	2542220	2541891	278694	278381	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC1F8.03c	SPAC1A6.03c	str3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.052426427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775682	2542220	2539420	278694	275985	SPAC1A6.03c	SPCC970.07c	SPAC1A6.03c	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633484852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775683	2542220	2541205	278694	277719	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC839.02	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC839.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.129133239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775684	2542220	2541471	278694	277973	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC1F5.03c	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC1F5.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382158161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775685	2542220	2543659	278694	280073	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC922.07c	SPAC1A6.03c	atd2	-	SPAC922.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866912359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775686	2542220	2539564	278694	276125	SPAC1A6.03c	SPCC550.12	SPAC1A6.03c	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392118643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775687	2542220	2539606	278694	276164	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC15D4.05	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC15D4.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.146406113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775688	2542220	2541026	278694	277541	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC337.09	SPAC1A6.03c	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634246367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775689	2542220	2540929	278694	277445	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC354.03	SPAC1A6.03c	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.70164355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775690	2542220	2540463	278694	276991	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC2F12.15c	SPAC1A6.03c	pfa3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.744806752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775691	2542220	2540993	278694	277509	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC342.01c	SPAC1A6.03c	alg6	-	SPBC3F6.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511398049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775692	2542220	2542023	278694	278506	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC1A6.03c	ufd2	-	SPAC145.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.305586229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775693	2542220	2542277	278694	278746	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC1A6.03c	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.635908822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775694	2542220	2541436	278694	277941	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC11H11.03c	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC11H11.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981989032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775695	2542220	2539822	278694	276372	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC16G5.02c	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC16G5.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.458821656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775696	2542220	2540344	278694	276873	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC30D10.03c	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC30D10.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992018134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775697	2542220	2540540	278694	277067	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC23E6.10c	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC23E6.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571610031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775698	2542220	2542530	278694	278988	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC1399.02	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC1399.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.740790425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775699	2542220	2540023	278694	276567	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC11C11.10	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC11C11.10	-	SPBC3B8.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984672578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775700	2542220	2541489	278694	277991	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC23D3.11	SPAC1A6.03c	ayr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.80804649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775701	2542220	2542568	278694	279024	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC1952.02	SPAC1A6.03c	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.83476673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775702	2542220	2543537	278694	279954	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC4D7.05	SPAC1A6.03c	sum1	-	tif34	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.712547071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775703	2542220	2540797	278694	277316	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC18H10.11c	SPAC1A6.03c	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.681800411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775704	2542220	2541392	278694	277902	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBPB10D8.04c	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBPB10D8.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807811948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775705	2542220	2542964	278694	279404	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC12G12.07c	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC12G12.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.185420793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775706	2542220	2543375	278694	279797	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC3H1.08c	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC3H1.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.185037875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775707	2542220	2542513	278694	278971	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC1952.05	SPAC1A6.03c	gcn5	-	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.170387828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775708	2542220	2541776	278694	278270	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC1A6.03c	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.012165678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775709	2542220	2540348	278694	276877	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC1A6.03c	exo1	-	mut2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.848686081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775710	2542220	2542660	278694	279113	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC328.03	SPAC1A6.03c	tps1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.405408251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775711	2542220	2543208	278694	279637	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC328.04	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC328.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816724473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775712	2542220	2540886	278694	277403	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC4F6.10	SPAC1A6.03c	vps901	-	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.564494204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775713	2542220	2542469	278694	278930	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC1A6.03c	erg5	-	cyp61	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.845668567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775714	2542220	2540497	278694	277025	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC27.04	SPAC1A6.03c	uds1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.311004212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775715	2542220	2541388	278694	277899	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBP8B7.30c	SPAC1A6.03c	thi5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572770183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775716	2542220	2538852	278694	275433	SPAC1A6.03c	SPCC4E9.01c	SPAC1A6.03c	rec11	-	SPCC550.16c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988085741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775717	2542220	2543396	278694	279818	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC1A6.03c	dsc4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.500308377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775718	2542220	2540326	278694	276856	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC2G5.06c	SPAC1A6.03c	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.059467809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775719	2542220	2541824	278694	278315	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC27E2.02	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC27E2.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.866075004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775720	2542220	2539667	278694	276222	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC1A6.03c	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.557591627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775721	2542220	2540665	278694	277190	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC83.02c	SPAC1A6.03c	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317546409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775722	2542220	2543178	278694	279608	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC31G5.15	SPAC1A6.03c	psd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.908321402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775723	2542220	2539974	278694	276518	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC32H8.07	SPAC1A6.03c	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.491277438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775724	2542220	2541542	278694	278042	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC4G9.02	SPAC1A6.03c	rnh201	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.900116688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775725	2542220	2541900	278694	278390	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC1A6.03c	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.861267961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775726	2542220	2539424	278694	275989	SPAC1A6.03c	SPCC622.19	SPAC1A6.03c	jmj4	-	mug149	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.85048591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775727	2542220	2542439	278694	278901	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC17A5.08	SPAC1A6.03c	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443093337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775728	2542220	2543381	278694	279803	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC630.09c	SPAC1A6.03c	mug58	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.245128911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775729	2542220	2541479	278694	277981	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC27F1.06c	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC27F1.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.253283605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775730	2542220	2543390	278694	279812	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC631.01c	SPAC1A6.03c	acp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980040593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775731	2542220	2540229	278694	276761	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC31F10.15c	SPAC1A6.03c	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994454308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775732	2542220	2542550	278694	279007	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC1B3.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.120242913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775733	2542220	2541746	278694	278240	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC1A6.03c	hus1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.158065779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775734	2542220	2540005	278694	276549	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC1347.09	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC1347.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813727009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775735	2542220	2541337	278694	277848	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC1A6.03c	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.308381397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775736	2542220	2540946	278694	277462	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC36.04	SPAC1A6.03c	cys11	-	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.80900374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775737	2542220	2542181	278694	278656	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC29E6.05c	SPAC1A6.03c	mxr1	-	SPAC29E6.05c|MsrA|SPAC30.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.102253817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775738	2542220	2542283	278694	278751	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC27F1.08	SPAC1A6.03c	pdt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098331043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775739	2542220	2541670	278694	278166	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC24H6.13	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC24H6.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.382274028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775740	2542220	2538907	278694	275484	SPAC1A6.03c	SPCC24B10.19c	SPAC1A6.03c	nts1	-	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933374959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775741	2542220	2539499	278694	276062	SPAC1A6.03c	SPCC622.08c	SPAC1A6.03c	hta1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869131189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775742	2542220	2543619	278694	280033	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC4F10.04	SPAC1A6.03c	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.261657501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775743	2542220	2542881	278694	279326	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC13F5.03c	SPAC1A6.03c	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.789645065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775744	2542220	2542940	278694	279381	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC31A2.12	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC31A2.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.375988317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775745	2542220	2540935	278694	277451	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC359.04c	SPAC1A6.03c	pfl7	-	SPBC359.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.059202036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775746	2542220	2539816	278694	276366	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC12C2.04	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC12C2.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870849035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775747	2542220	2539013	278694	275586	SPAC1A6.03c	SPCC364.03	SPAC1A6.03c	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387011912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775748	2542220	2542025	278694	278507	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC23C11.01	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC23C11.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320223672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775749	2542220	2543437	278694	279857	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAPB1A10.14	SPAC1A6.03c	pof15	-	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.048426767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775750	2542220	2540516	278694	277044	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC21C3.01c	SPAC1A6.03c	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.63035708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775751	2542220	2540202	278694	276735	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC16G5.09	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC16G5.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.274388837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775752	2542220	2543046	278694	279481	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC3C7.10	SPAC1A6.03c	pex13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196675561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775753	2542220	2541757	278694	278251	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC2F7.10	SPAC1A6.03c	akr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.569683534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775754	2542220	2539736	278694	276288	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC12C2.12c	SPAC1A6.03c	glo1	-	SPBC21D10.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.144808046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775755	2542220	2539170	278694	275741	SPAC1A6.03c	SPCC306.02c	SPAC1A6.03c	SPCC306.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866719381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775756	2542220	2539205	278694	275775	SPAC1A6.03c	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC1A6.03c	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.626271141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775757	2542220	2542607	278694	279061	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC18B11.02c	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC18B11.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.215464164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775758	2542220	2543056	278694	279490	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC3A11.04	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC3A11.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980201724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775759	2542220	2540140	278694	276677	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC16C6.08c	SPAC1A6.03c	qcr6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931954842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775760	2542220	2539253	278694	275823	SPAC1A6.03c	SPCC1827.03c	SPAC1A6.03c	SPCC1827.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097713453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775761	2542220	2541539	278694	278039	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAP27G11.12	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAP27G11.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.253294934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775762	2542220	2542630	278694	279084	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC2C4.06c	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC2C4.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866839279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775763	2542220	2543076	278694	279509	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC30C2.07	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC30C2.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154732035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775764	2542220	2543070	278694	279503	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC2H10.02c	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC2H10.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037385497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775765	2542220	2540360	278694	276889	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC2G5.01	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC2G5.01	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.267280716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775766	2542220	2540558	278694	277085	SPAC1A6.03c	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC1A6.03c	clr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.692509124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775767	2542220	2542424	278694	278886	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC1805.14	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453851686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775768	2542220	2543624	278694	280038	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC4D7.06c	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC4D7.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.615321758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775769	2542220	2542578	278694	279034	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC18B11.09c	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC18B11.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876928487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775770	2539180	2539774	275751	276325	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC17A3.10	sts5	pas4	orb4	pi036	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569732725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775771	2539180	2539147	275751	275719	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC622.12c	sts5	gdh1	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.176775286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775772	2539180	2538721	275751	275305	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC1494.10	sts5	adn3	orb4	SPCC70.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.119659027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775773	2539180	2539841	275751	276389	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC17D1.05	sts5	SPBC17D1.05	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.451000891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775774	2539180	2540942	275751	277458	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC3H7.14	sts5	mug176	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.972269863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775775	2539180	2542430	275751	278892	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC17G6.06	sts5	rps2401	orb4	rps24|rps24-1|rps24a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.885471072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775776	2539180	2538961	275751	275535	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC285.14	sts5	trs130	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.62243702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775777	2539180	2542577	275751	279033	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC19G12.15c	sts5	tpp1	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.975467548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775778	2539180	2539949	275751	276493	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC1703.04	sts5	mlh1	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.514043956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775779	2539180	2542518	275751	278976	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC1B3.16c	sts5	vht1	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.075615984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775780	2539180	2541343	275751	277854	SPCC16C4.09	SPBPB2B2.19c	sts5	SPBPB2B2.19c	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.150405157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775781	2539180	2542143	275751	278619	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC17C9.07	sts5	alg8	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.028340923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775782	2539180	2541145	275751	277660	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC651.12c	sts5	dbl7	orb4	SPBC651.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.470826602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775783	2539180	2539430	275751	275994	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC417.12	sts5	SPCC417.12	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.692557708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775784	2539180	2539452	275751	276015	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC70.03c	sts5	SPCC70.03c	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.059975268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775785	2539180	2542066	275751	278543	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC227.05	sts5	SPAC227.05	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.884675158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775786	2539180	2542812	275751	279259	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC6F6.01	sts5	cch1	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.810277487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775787	2539180	2539940	275751	276484	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC16A3.10	sts5	SPBC16A3.10	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.826047394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775788	2539180	2539167	275751	275738	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC1281.08	sts5	wtf11	orb4	meu24	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45722271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775789	2539180	2540524	275751	277052	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC21B10.08c	sts5	SPBC21B10.08c	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.916669428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775790	2539180	2542358	275751	278823	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC1782.09c	sts5	clp1	orb4	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.344080393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775791	2539180	2543592	275751	280007	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC4F10.18	sts5	nup37	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.556720242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775792	2539180	2542831	275751	279278	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC20H4.08	sts5	whi2	orb4	SPAC20H4.08|SPAC145.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816396644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775793	2539180	2539930	275751	276474	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC1198.11c	sts5	reb1	orb4	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.480995132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775794	2539180	2541130	275751	277645	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC776.11	sts5	rpl2801	orb4	rpl28-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.128508482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775795	2539180	2540068	275751	276606	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC1734.12c	sts5	alg12	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.109969507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775796	2539180	2539097	275751	275669	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC757.04	sts5	SPCC757.04	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098112039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775797	2539180	2542443	275751	278905	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC17G6.13	sts5	slt1	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.412293729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775798	2539180	2540296	275751	276827	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC2D10.05	sts5	exg3	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.681691757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775799	2539180	2541051	275751	277566	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC3E7.08c	sts5	rad13	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.189484902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775800	2539180	2543376	275751	279798	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC3H1.06c	sts5	SPAC3H1.06c	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.833586687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775801	2539180	5802967	275751	858105	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC20G4.08	sts5	pdc1	orb4	SPAC20G4.08|SPAC4F10.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.420944628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775802	2539180	2542963	275751	279403	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC1071.03c	sts5	sil1	orb4	SPAC1071.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.046909707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775803	2539180	2543572	275751	279987	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC4G8.04	sts5	SPAC4G8.04	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.786845458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775804	2539180	2543432	275751	279852	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC4G8.05	sts5	ppk14	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.246189006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775805	2539180	2542546	275751	279003	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC1399.05c	sts5	toe1	orb4	SPAC1399.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.268001779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775806	2539180	2543527	275751	279945	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC4C5.01	sts5	SPAC4C5.01	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.352902157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775807	2539180	2540450	275751	276978	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC2G2.09c	sts5	crs1	orb4	mug17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.336167192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775808	2539180	2540686	275751	277211	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC21D10.10	sts5	bdc1	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.686831785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775809	2539180	2542701	275751	279154	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC26H5.05	sts5	mga2	orb4	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.999823101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775810	2539180	2542103	275751	278579	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC31G5.11	sts5	pac2	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.870879946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775811	2539180	2543103	275751	279535	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC3F10.09	sts5	SPAC3F10.09	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.311283186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775812	2539180	2540455	275751	276983	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC215.05	sts5	gpd1	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922754596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775813	2539180	2542613	275751	279067	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC18B11.03c	sts5	SPAC18B11.03c	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922288895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775814	2539180	2540664	275751	277189	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC215.02	sts5	bob1	orb4	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875734732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775815	2539180	2543320	275751	279744	SPCC16C4.09	SPAPJ695.01c	sts5	SPAPJ695.01c	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.470500124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775816	2539180	2540999	275751	277515	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC4B4.04	sts5	SPBC4B4.04	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.053773512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775817	2539180	2539332	275751	275898	SPCC16C4.09	SPCPB1C11.01	sts5	amt1	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093801362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775818	2539180	2540975	275751	277491	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC354.12	sts5	gpd3	orb4	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.55919685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775819	2539180	2540015	275751	276559	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC1685.02c	sts5	rps1202	orb4	rps12-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.412135024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775820	2539180	2541951	275751	278438	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC222.05c	sts5	mss1	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871702879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775821	2539180	2540564	275751	277091	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC530.03c	sts5	bag102	orb4	bag1-b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.764131124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775822	2539180	2541208	275751	277722	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC887.04c	sts5	lub1	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.343326827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775823	2539180	2541313	275751	277825	SPCC16C4.09	SPBP26C9.02c	sts5	car1	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.449621781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775824	2539180	2541471	275751	277973	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC1F5.03c	sts5	SPAC1F5.03c	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702583384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775825	2539180	2542816	275751	279263	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC4G8.11c	sts5	atp10	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.480591141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775826	2539180	2541058	275751	277573	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC3H7.09	sts5	erf2	orb4	mug142	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.343014459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775827	2539180	2540251	275751	276783	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC336.05c	sts5	SPBC336.05c	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.341022092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775828	2539180	2541994	275751	278478	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC26A3.14c	sts5	SPAC26A3.14c	orb4	SPAC23A6.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.400116666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775829	2539180	2541682	275751	278178	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC15F9.02	sts5	seh1	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.250945036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775830	2539180	2539564	275751	276125	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC550.12	sts5	arp6	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.023860222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775831	2539180	2543288	275751	279713	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC6C3.03c	sts5	SPAC6C3.03c	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.551283173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775832	2539180	2540029	275751	276573	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC16A3.01	sts5	spn3	orb4	SPBC543.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19568994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775833	2539180	2542156	275751	278632	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC57A7.07c	sts5	SPAC57A7.07c	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814298892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775834	2539180	2542689	275751	279142	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC29B12.04	sts5	snz1	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81557358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775835	2539180	2542709	275751	279162	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC26F1.08c	sts5	SPAC26F1.08c	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.827956238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775836	2539180	2543159	275751	279590	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC3C7.09	sts5	set8	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.571184828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775837	2539180	2540306	275751	276836	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC2G5.02c	sts5	ckb2	orb4	SPBC2G5.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.171727641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775838	2539180	2542555	275751	279012	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC1952.06c	sts5	SPAC1952.06c	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870598025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775839	2539180	2540313	275751	276843	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC337.04	sts5	ppk27	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.326776477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775840	2539180	2539117	275751	275689	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC74.06	sts5	mak3	orb4	phk2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.343280116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775841	2539180	2539575	275751	276135	SPCC16C4.09	SPCP20C8.02c	sts5	SPCP20C8.02c	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.137685024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775842	2539180	2539064	275751	275636	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC126.06	sts5	twf1	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048161829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775843	2539180	2538735	275751	275319	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC70.10	sts5	SPCC70.10	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.138008929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775844	2539180	2540160	275751	276695	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC1773.17c	sts5	SPBC1773.17c	orb4	SPBP26C9.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.459527822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775845	2539180	2543048	275751	279483	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC3F10.02c	sts5	trk1	orb4	sptrk	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041965627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775846	2539180	2541119	275751	277634	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC651.11c	sts5	apm3	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.499111676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775847	2539180	2539937	275751	276481	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC1539.08	sts5	arf6	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.978947768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775848	2539180	2538825	275751	275406	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC757.12	sts5	SPCC757.12	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256706928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775849	2539180	2541530	275751	278030	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC57A10.10c	sts5	sla1	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.606095342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775850	2539180	2541323	275751	277835	SPCC16C4.09	SPBP35G2.14	sts5	SPBP35G2.14	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.625699235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775851	2539180	2540425	275751	276953	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC27.06c	sts5	mgr2	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.386178607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775852	2539180	2541436	275751	277941	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC11H11.03c	sts5	SPAC11H11.03c	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.560417079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775853	2539180	2541692	275751	278188	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC29E6.07	sts5	SPAC29E6.07	orb4	SPAC30.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.314638533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775854	2539180	2539823	275751	276373	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC16A3.18	sts5	cip1	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.130164719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775855	2539180	2541597	275751	278094	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC29E6.09	sts5	SPAC29E6.09	orb4	SPAC30.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.52646515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775856	2539180	2541428	275751	277933	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC14C4.11	sts5	SPAC14C4.11	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.155341557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775857	2539180	2543641	275751	280055	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC3H5.08c	sts5	SPAC3H5.08c	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.870439975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775858	2539180	2538866	275751	275446	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC1620.12c	sts5	SPCC1620.12c	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.920685753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775859	2539180	2541905	275751	278395	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC6G9.01c	sts5	SPAC6G9.01c	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982084478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775860	2539180	2542530	275751	278988	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC1399.02	sts5	SPAC1399.02	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044599439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775861	2539180	2538700	275751	275285	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC645.13	sts5	SPCC645.13	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09792931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775862	2539180	2539381	275751	275947	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC1739.10	sts5	mug33	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.479218233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775863	2539180	2542791	275751	279240	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC167.04	sts5	pam17	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.350114427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775864	2539180	2540319	275751	276849	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC30D10.16	sts5	pha2	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.916982794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775865	2539180	2540893	275751	277409	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC543.10	sts5	get1	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.33746254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775866	2539180	2540964	275751	277480	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC365.16	sts5	SPBC365.16	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865288936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775867	2539180	2542554	275751	279011	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC1952.03	sts5	otu2	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.344514843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775868	2539180	2542331	275751	278797	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC1834.05	sts5	alg9	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.267694257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775869	2539180	2543573	275751	279988	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC869.11	sts5	cat1	orb4	SPAC922.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.71994023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775870	2539180	2541384	275751	277895	SPCC16C4.09	SPBP8B7.26	sts5	SPBP8B7.26	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.112011415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775871	2539180	2539467	275751	276030	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC417.07c	sts5	mto1	orb4	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.126459282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775872	2539180	2541885	275751	278375	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC22H10.03c	sts5	kap114	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932980849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775873	2539180	2539804	275751	276354	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC1105.11c	sts5	hht3	orb4	h3.3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.39652406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775874	2539180	2543135	275751	279567	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC869.06c	sts5	SPAC869.06c	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445987509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775875	2539180	2543020	275751	279456	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC10F6.13c	sts5	SPAC10F6.13c	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.836682803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775876	2539180	2542177	275751	278652	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC17H9.08	sts5	SPAC17H9.08	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.926358897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775877	2539180	2539003	275751	275577	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC1442.17c	sts5	ist1	orb4	SPCC285.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.471316275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775878	2539180	2539870	275751	276416	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC1709.18	sts5	tif452	orb4	SPBC409.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.924542894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775879	2539180	2541249	275751	277763	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC947.01	sts5	alf1	orb4	SPBC947.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.176957234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775880	2539180	2543102	275751	279534	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC31G5.21	sts5	SPAC31G5.21	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092523879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775881	2539180	2543511	275751	279929	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC4G9.19	sts5	SPAC4G9.19	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.320864954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775882	2539180	2541776	275751	278270	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC23H3.05c	sts5	swd1	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.332331493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775883	2539180	2541264	275751	277778	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC902.06	sts5	mto2	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.973093013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775884	2539180	2542105	275751	278581	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC14C4.15c	sts5	SPAC14C4.15c	orb4	SPAPJ760.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.484173786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775885	2539180	2543144	275751	279576	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC3F10.05c	sts5	mug113	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.071829254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775886	2539180	2543593	275751	280008	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC4G9.10	sts5	arg3	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814449607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775887	2539180	2541982	275751	278467	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC23A1.06c	sts5	cmk2	orb4	mkp2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.761617399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775888	2539180	2539628	275751	276185	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC1604.03c	sts5	SPBC1604.03c	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868890803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775889	2539180	2543483	275751	279903	SPCC16C4.09	SPAPB2B4.02	sts5	grx5	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.020249537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775890	2539180	2540348	275751	276877	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC29A10.05	sts5	exo1	orb4	mut2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.470306365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775891	2539180	2542123	275751	278599	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC18G6.15	sts5	mal3	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639963028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775892	2539180	2540396	275751	276924	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC31F10.12	sts5	tma20	orb4	SPBC31F10.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.28258101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775893	2539180	2540150	275751	276687	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC16E9.14c	sts5	zrg17	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.435528839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775894	2539180	2542971	275751	279410	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC105.02c	sts5	SPAC105.02c	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.266295089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775895	2539180	2542543	275751	279000	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC30D11.11	sts5	SPAC30D11.11	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.034279212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775896	2539180	2543638	275751	280052	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC3H8.09c	sts5	nab3	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.801307444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775897	2539180	2540400	275751	276928	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC28F2.02	sts5	mep33	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.032258369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775898	2539180	2541943	275751	278430	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC222.07c	sts5	hri2	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.61275561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775899	2539180	2541435	275751	277940	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC2E1P5.02c	sts5	mug109	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.185348986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775900	2539180	2540403	275751	276931	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC21D10.11c	sts5	nfs1	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.311272423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775901	2539180	2543531	275751	279949	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC926.06c	sts5	SPAC926.06c	orb4	lrr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.275407277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775902	2539180	2541701	275751	278197	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC1296.03c	sts5	sxa2	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.524049519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775903	2539180	2542921	275751	279362	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC1093.01	sts5	ppr5	orb4	SPAC12B10.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.408592238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775904	2539180	2542469	275751	278930	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC19A8.04	sts5	erg5	orb4	cyp61	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.673266961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775905	2539180	2542522	275751	278980	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC19A8.03	sts5	ymr1	orb4	SPAC19A8.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.478103989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775906	2539180	2542216	275751	278690	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC19A8.02	sts5	SPAC19A8.02	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868748126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775907	2539180	2543231	275751	279659	SPCC16C4.09	SPAPB8E5.08	sts5	SPAPB8E5.08	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153700535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775908	2539180	2539689	275751	276244	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC1861.03	sts5	mak10	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.458510717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775909	2539180	2543246	275751	279674	SPCC16C4.09	SPAPB8E5.05	sts5	mfm1	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.341989484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775910	2539180	2543245	275751	279673	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC56F8.06c	sts5	alg10	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.192577245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775911	2539180	2539857	275751	276404	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC1604.20c	sts5	tea2	orb4	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913319075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775912	2539180	2541413	275751	277921	SPCC16C4.09	SPBPJ4664.06	sts5	gpt1	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.032260479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775913	2539180	2541899	275751	278389	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC22E12.11c	sts5	set3	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870786855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775914	2539180	2541739	275751	278233	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC2G11.10c	sts5	SPAC2G11.10c	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.348890791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775915	2539180	2543250	275751	279678	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC3G9.15c	sts5	fcf2	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096570288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775916	2539180	2540350	275751	276879	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC317.01	sts5	mbx2	orb4	pvg4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980369668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775917	2539180	2538769	275751	275352	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC126.04c	sts5	sgf73	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864732065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775918	2539180	2540665	275751	277190	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC83.02c	sts5	rpl4302	orb4	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.681483051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775919	2539180	2539482	275751	276045	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC417.06c	sts5	mug27	orb4	ppk35|slk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931734559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775920	2539180	2541326	275751	277838	SPCC16C4.09	SPBP35G2.03c	sts5	sgo1	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.495619656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775921	2539180	2540675	275751	277200	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC21H7.07c	sts5	his5	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.832789925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775922	2539180	2540961	275751	277477	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC36B7.03	sts5	sec63	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.976358985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775923	2539180	2542315	275751	278781	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC16C9.01c	sts5	SPAC16C9.01c	orb4	SPAC4G8.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.341865681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775924	2539180	2541542	275751	278042	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC4G9.02	sts5	rnh201	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.713795967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775925	2539180	2540232	275751	276764	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC336.10c	sts5	tif512	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.292868702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775926	2539180	2539232	275751	275802	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC1223.04c	sts5	set11	orb4	mug76	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.012333284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775927	2539180	2542431	275751	278893	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC1A6.01c	sts5	SPAC1A6.01c	orb4	SPAC23C4.20c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.175975067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775928	2539180	2543378	275751	279800	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC3H8.07c	sts5	pac10	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.880329814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775929	2539180	2542867	275751	279312	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC343.16	sts5	lys2	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.268135881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775930	2539180	2543311	275751	279735	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC977.15	sts5	SPAC977.15	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.567596435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775931	2539180	2540318	275751	276848	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC30B4.04c	sts5	sol1	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924665671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775932	2539180	2539027	275751	275600	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC1322.08	sts5	srk1	orb4	mkp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.914988814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775933	2539180	2543080	275751	279513	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC3A11.10c	sts5	SPAC3A11.10c	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.510978249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775934	2539180	2542919	275751	279360	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC6C3.08	sts5	nas6	orb4	SPAC6C3.08	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.137646574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775935	2539180	2542813	275751	279260	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC29B12.11c	sts5	SPAC29B12.11c	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.417317688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775936	2539180	2539715	275751	276268	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC1778.09	sts5	SPBC1778.09	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.558205041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775937	2539180	2540387	275751	276915	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC24C6.04	sts5	SPBC24C6.04	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.861528448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775938	2539180	2538824	275751	275405	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC1442.14c	sts5	hnt1	orb4	SPCC1442.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.253517639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775939	2539180	2543119	275751	279551	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC3A11.07	sts5	nde2	orb4	SPAC3A11.07	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.435505522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775940	2539180	2541389	275751	277900	SPCC16C4.09	SPBPB2B2.09c	sts5	SPBPB2B2.09c	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.244070353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775941	2539180	2541694	275751	278190	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC1071.04c	sts5	spc2	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.824499017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775942	2539180	2539740	275751	276292	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC1685.04	sts5	SPBC1685.04	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866462445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775943	2539180	2540019	275751	276563	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC1685.01	sts5	pmp1	orb4	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.989139142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775944	2539180	2542618	275751	279072	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC1952.15c	sts5	rec24	orb4	mug6	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.345356642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775945	2539180	2541536	275751	278036	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC1071.02	sts5	mms19	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.204442427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775946	2539180	2541708	275751	278203	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC31A2.02	sts5	trm112	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.121950025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775947	2539180	2539402	275751	275967	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC613.03	sts5	SPCC613.03	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.345238889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775948	2539180	2540180	275751	276713	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC16D10.11c	sts5	rps1801	orb4	rps18-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.8663728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775949	2539180	2540184	275751	276717	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC106.12c	sts5	SPBC106.12c	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042627545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775950	2539180	2541395	275751	277904	SPCC16C4.09	SPBP8B7.25	sts5	cyp4	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.917661449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775951	2539180	2542773	275751	279222	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC16.01	sts5	rho2	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.606937191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775952	2539180	2541283	275751	277796	SPCC16C4.09	SPBP8B7.02	sts5	rng9	orb4	SPBP8B7.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.999092738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775953	2539180	2539052	275751	275625	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC663.09c	sts5	SPCC663.09c	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.326520911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775954	2539180	2539427	275751	275992	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC663.15c	sts5	SPCC663.15c	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.802034657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775955	2539180	2539059	275751	275632	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC737.06c	sts5	SPCC737.06c	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.880798989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775956	2539180	2539498	275751	276061	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC645.11c	sts5	mug117	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.050661044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775957	2539180	2542255	275751	278725	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC57A7.08	sts5	pzh1	orb4	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.05663183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775958	2539180	2542829	275751	279276	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC13D6.02c	sts5	byr3	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.337931331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775959	2539180	2541488	275751	277990	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC227.17c	sts5	SPAC227.17c	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.716445214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775960	2539180	2539812	275751	276362	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC1347.02	sts5	fkbp39	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.821784967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775961	2539180	2540193	275751	276726	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC1289.10c	sts5	adn2	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.318271209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775962	2539180	2541378	275751	277889	SPCC16C4.09	SPBP8B7.21	sts5	ubp3	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.457941261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775963	2539180	2542329	275751	278795	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC9G1.10c	sts5	SPAC9G1.10c	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143180183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775964	2539180	2540926	275751	277442	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC359.06	sts5	mug14	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.280295655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775965	2539180	2539527	275751	276089	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC338.16	sts5	pof3	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507381073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775966	2539180	2542973	275751	279412	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC10F6.04	sts5	SPAC10F6.04	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815503982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775967	2539180	2542453	275751	278914	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC186.01	sts5	pfl9	orb4	SPAC186.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152946802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775968	2539180	2541963	275751	278449	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC21E11.04	sts5	aca1	orb4	ppr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.13796845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775969	2539180	2542875	275751	279320	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC13G7.02c	sts5	ssa1	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.183253102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775970	2539180	2539763	275751	276314	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC1861.05	sts5	SPBC1861.05	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.460527843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775971	2539180	2542283	275751	278751	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC27F1.08	sts5	pdt1	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818297911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775972	2539180	2543113	275751	279545	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC3F10.07c	sts5	erf4	orb4	mug91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.469382798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775973	2539180	2539453	275751	276016	SPCC16C4.09	SPCPB1C11.03	sts5	SPCPB1C11.03	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92014489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775974	2539180	2542759	275751	279209	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC9G1.07	sts5	SPAC9G1.07	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047742176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775975	2539180	2542619	275751	279073	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC6G10.02c	sts5	tea3	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.893394386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775976	2539180	2543628	275751	280042	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC3H8.10	sts5	spo20	orb4	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.835693054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775977	2539180	2539555	275751	276116	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC4B3.08	sts5	lsg1	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.198987836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775978	2539180	2542286	275751	278754	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC1786.01c	sts5	ptl2	orb4	SPAC1786.01c|SPAC31G5.20c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.189864743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775979	2539180	2543071	275751	279504	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC3C7.06c	sts5	pit1	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.830999677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775980	2539180	2543567	275751	279983	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC890.03	sts5	ppk16	orb4	mug92	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.144775118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775981	2539180	2541909	275751	278399	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC227.01c	sts5	erd1	orb4	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.397569953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775982	2539180	2542915	275751	279357	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC6C3.06c	sts5	SPAC6C3.06c	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.265199436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775983	2539180	2539925	275751	276469	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC16H5.13	sts5	SPBC16H5.13	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.603811866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775984	2539180	2542113	275751	278589	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC1B3.11c	sts5	ypt4	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.070859018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775985	2539180	2538714	275751	275298	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC330.11	sts5	btb1	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92609441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775986	2539180	2541103	275751	277618	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC651.06	sts5	mug166	orb4	csa1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.963382813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775987	2539180	2541432	275751	277937	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC1F5.05c	sts5	mso1	orb4	SPAC1F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.860819693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775988	2539180	2539707	275751	276260	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC17F3.01c	sts5	rga5	orb4	SPBC557.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.729017601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775989	2539180	2540421	275751	276949	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC2D10.19c	sts5	alb1	orb4	SPBC2D10.19c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.568904436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775990	2539180	2542025	275751	278507	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC23C11.01	sts5	SPAC23C11.01	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.572899363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775991	2539180	2540829	275751	277347	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC800.09	sts5	sum2	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.87186204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775992	2539180	2540677	275751	277202	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC21B10.03c	sts5	ath1	orb4	SPBC21B10.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.220428589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775993	2539180	2539729	275751	276281	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC11B10.07c	sts5	ivn1	orb4	pi004|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.77054521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775994	2539180	2539514	275751	276076	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC663.14c	sts5	trp663	orb4	SPCC663.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.262276215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775995	2539180	2543091	275751	279524	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC12G12.15	sts5	sif3	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.921336139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775996	2539180	2543437	275751	279857	SPCC16C4.09	SPAPB1A10.14	sts5	pof15	orb4	SPAPB1A10.14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.254112071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775997	2539180	2540629	275751	277155	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC21D10.09c	sts5	rkr1	orb4	SPBC21D10.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.250790241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775998	2539180	2542826	275751	279273	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC13G6.09	sts5	SPAC13G6.09	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.764454579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
775999	2539180	2540569	275751	277096	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC660.17c	sts5	SPBC660.17c	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389683359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776000	2539180	2539668	275751	276223	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC11B10.10c	sts5	pht1	orb4	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.958501374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776001	2539180	2541380	275751	277891	SPCC16C4.09	SPBPB2B2.13	sts5	gal1	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.128846775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776002	2539180	2543602	275751	280017	SPCC16C4.09	SPAPB1A11.04c	sts5	mca1	orb4	SPAPB1A11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4718284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776003	2539180	2541773	275751	278267	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC23H4.02	sts5	ppk9	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.885392584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776004	2539180	2540516	275751	277044	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC21C3.01c	sts5	vps13a	orb4	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.750829357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776005	2539180	2540182	275751	276715	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC16G5.06	sts5	SPBC16G5.06	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.676788541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776006	2539180	2540267	275751	276798	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC32C12.03c	sts5	ppk25	orb4	kin2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.330288894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776007	2539180	2542574	275751	279030	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC186.05c	sts5	SPAC186.05c	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444646664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776008	2539180	2543183	275751	279612	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC3A12.06c	sts5	SPAC3A12.06c	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.188426066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776009	2539180	2540920	275751	277436	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC342.03	sts5	gas4	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.06881563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776010	2539180	2541744	275751	278238	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC23A1.02c	sts5	SPAC23A1.02c	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.608497398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776011	2539180	2540927	275751	277443	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC365.06	sts5	pmt3	orb4	smt3|ubl2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924673084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776012	2539180	2541115	275751	277630	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC660.07	sts5	ntp1	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.500184389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776013	2539180	2539207	275751	275777	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC285.09c	sts5	cgs2	orb4	pde1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.881696098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776014	2539180	2541757	275751	278251	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC2F7.10	sts5	akr1	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.106567726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776015	2539180	2541356	275751	277867	SPCC16C4.09	SPBP35G2.12	sts5	SPBP35G2.12	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.68305073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776016	2539180	2539702	275751	276255	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC1604.12	sts5	SPBC1604.12	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.880303812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776017	2539180	2542838	275751	279284	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC13G7.11	sts5	SPAC13G7.11	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.126140561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776018	2539180	3361511	275751	280587	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC23C4.08	sts5	rho3	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871089764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776019	2539180	2542442	275751	278904	SPCC16C4.09	SPACUNK12.02c	sts5	cmk1	orb4	CaMK-I|SPAC25D11.02C	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928147843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776020	2539180	2539920	275751	276464	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC119.08	sts5	pmk1	orb4	spm1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866940905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776021	2539180	2540140	275751	276677	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC16C6.08c	sts5	qcr6	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.453418508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776022	2539180	2540896	275751	277412	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC19C2.13c	sts5	ctu2	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.107584072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776023	2539180	2540551	275751	277078	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC23E6.01c	sts5	cxr1	orb4	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.97535369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776024	2539180	2541941	275751	278428	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC20H4.03c	sts5	tfs1	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.342098891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776025	2539180	2542871	275751	279316	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC6F12.10c	sts5	ade3	orb4	min11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.050085214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776026	2539180	2542021	275751	278504	SPCC16C4.09	SPAP14E8.02	sts5	tos4	orb4	SPAP14E8.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.347744172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776027	2539180	2542702	275751	279155	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC8E11.01c	sts5	SPAC8E11.01c	orb4	SPAC959.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.920905039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776028	2539180	2540808	275751	277327	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC418.02	sts5	SPBC418.02	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.26720208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776029	2539180	2542059	275751	278537	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC328.06	sts5	ubp2	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.760316079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776030	2539180	3361360	275751	280436	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC1652.01	sts5	SPBC1652.01	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.826126037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776031	2539180	2538861	275751	275441	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC1620.11	sts5	nup97	orb4	mug87	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.868236675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776032	2539180	2543379	275751	279801	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC821.09	sts5	eng1	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042299794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776033	2539180	2539181	275751	275752	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC622.14	sts5	SPCC622.14	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816436905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776034	2539180	2543277	275751	279705	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC1002.03c	sts5	gls2	orb4	gls2alpha	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383269641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776035	2539180	3361481	275751	280557	SPCC16C4.09	SPAPB24D3.05c	sts5	SPAPB24D3.05c	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.353727032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776036	2539180	2543387	275751	279809	SPCC16C4.09	SPAPB1E7.02c	sts5	mcl1	orb4	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.437162973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776037	2539180	2543327	275751	279750	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC1D4.06c	sts5	csk1	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.442188217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776038	2539180	2540451	275751	276979	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC2G2.17c	sts5	SPBC2G2.17c	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.160147376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776039	2539180	2543087	275751	279520	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC30C2.04	sts5	SPAC30C2.04	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090920966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776040	2539180	2543081	275751	279514	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC30C2.05	sts5	erv14	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.369736625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776041	2539180	2543076	275751	279509	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC30C2.07	sts5	SPAC30C2.07	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.709220791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776042	2539180	2542175	275751	278650	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC1F3.02c	sts5	mkh1	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.024371359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776043	2539180	3361517	275751	280593	SPCC16C4.09	SPAP11E10.02c	sts5	mam3	orb4	SPAPB1A10.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865593333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776044	2539180	2541872	275751	278362	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC23H4.10c	sts5	thi4	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.192264221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776045	2539180	2540561	275751	277088	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC28F2.05c	sts5	SPBC28F2.05c	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.518239837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776046	2539180	2543610	275751	280024	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC4D7.01c	sts5	sec71	orb4	SPAP8A3.15c|sec7a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.459755165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776047	2539180	2539583	275751	276142	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC777.04	sts5	SPCC777.04	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.5372757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776048	2539180	2541375	275751	277886	SPCC16C4.09	SPBP8B7.31	sts5	SPBP8B7.31	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991545244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776049	2539180	2540093	275751	276631	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC115.02c	sts5	afg1	orb4	SPBC115.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87984614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776050	2539180	2541646	275751	278142	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC750.06c	sts5	SPAC750.06c	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933926727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776051	2539180	2540167	275751	276702	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC1683.04	sts5	SPBC1683.04	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.863790671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776052	2539180	2538834	275751	275415	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC126.08c	sts5	SPCC126.08c	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.810755482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776053	2539180	2541080	275751	277595	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC557.04	sts5	ppk29	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041194648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776054	2539180	2543090	275751	279523	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC1348.01	sts5	SPBC1348.01	orb4	SPAC1348.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.513359376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776055	2539180	2542656	275751	279110	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC2E1P3.05c	sts5	SPAC2E1P3.05c	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.864356358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776056	2539180	2540938	275751	277454	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC365.14c	sts5	uge1	orb4	gal10	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.863992332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776057	2539180	2540208	275751	276741	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC9B6.03	sts5	SPBC9B6.03	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.496958319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776058	2539180	2541297	275751	277809	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC9B6.07	sts5	nop52	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.063795904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776059	2539180	2539738	275751	276290	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC17G9.09	sts5	tif213	orb4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256166229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776060	2539180	2538940	275751	275515	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC1620.07c	sts5	lnp1	orb4	SPCC1620.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.086492818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776061	2539180	2540787	275751	277306	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC1921.07c	sts5	sgf29	orb4	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.695148257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776062	2539180	2540734	275751	277257	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC19G7.09	sts5	ulp1	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.780394533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776063	2539180	2540736	275751	277259	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC19F8.02	sts5	SPBC19F8.02	orb4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930799452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776064	2540622	2543308	277148	279732	SPBC21C3.05	SPAC694.04c	sap62	SPAC694.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.604351808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776065	2540622	2543563	277148	279979	SPBC21C3.05	SPAC664.02c	sap62	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.282163777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776066	2540622	2541801	277148	278292	SPBC21C3.05	SPAC2F7.08c	sap62	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.012910722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776067	2540622	2542507	277148	278965	SPBC21C3.05	SPAC18G6.13	sap62	SPAC18G6.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980896158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776068	2540622	2540318	277148	276848	SPBC21C3.05	SPBC30B4.04c	sap62	sol1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.348330635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776069	2540622	2539527	277148	276089	SPBC21C3.05	SPCC338.16	sap62	pof3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.721813061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776070	9407033	2539375	1028396	275941	SPAC222.18	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC222.18	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330274245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776071	2539617	2540105	276175	276642	SPBC1861.04c	SPBC106.04	prp24	ada1	SPBC1861.04c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.59358119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776072	2539617	2542237	276175	278709	SPBC1861.04c	SPAC19E9.02	prp24	fin1	SPBC1861.04c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.80080008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776073	2539617	3361561	276175	280637	SPBC1861.04c	SPAC11E3.01c	prp24	swr1	SPBC1861.04c	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.689488395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776074	2539617	2539332	276175	275898	SPBC1861.04c	SPCPB1C11.01	prp24	amt1	SPBC1861.04c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.436313822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776075	2539617	2539564	276175	276125	SPBC1861.04c	SPCC550.12	prp24	arp6	SPBC1861.04c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577338371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776076	2539617	2542165	276175	278641	SPBC1861.04c	SPAC1782.08c	prp24	rex3	SPBC1861.04c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.345243177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776077	2539617	2543308	276175	279732	SPBC1861.04c	SPAC694.04c	prp24	SPAC694.04c	SPBC1861.04c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.230491089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776078	2539617	2539244	276175	275814	SPBC1861.04c	SPCC1672.06c	prp24	asp1	SPBC1861.04c	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388503205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776079	2539617	2543426	276175	279846	SPBC1861.04c	SPAC631.02	prp24	bdf2	SPBC1861.04c	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.711379029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776080	2539617	2541416	276175	277923	SPBC1861.04c	SPBCPT2R1.01c	prp24	SPBCPT2R1.01c	SPBC1861.04c	SPBPB2B2.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.259929365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776081	2539617	2539352	276175	275918	SPBC1861.04c	SPCC188.07	prp24	ccq1	SPBC1861.04c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.52238177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776082	2539617	2541911	276175	278401	SPBC1861.04c	SPAC212.04c	prp24	SPAC212.04c	SPBC1861.04c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515756555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776083	2539617	2541710	276175	278205	SPBC1861.04c	SPAC343.11c	prp24	msc1	SPBC1861.04c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.65408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776084	2539617	2542710	276175	279163	SPBC1861.04c	SPAC750.08c	prp24	SPAC750.08c	SPBC1861.04c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.691661002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776085	2539617	2541337	276175	277848	SPBC1861.04c	SPBP35G2.13c	prp24	swc2	SPBC1861.04c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.428995685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776086	2539617	2540821	276175	277339	SPBC1861.04c	SPBC800.03	prp24	clr3	SPBC1861.04c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.56782951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776087	2539617	2539668	276175	276223	SPBC1861.04c	SPBC11B10.10c	prp24	pht1	SPBC1861.04c	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.735947576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776088	2539617	2541124	276175	277639	SPBC1861.04c	SPBC646.02	prp24	cwf11	SPBC1861.04c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.694181391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776089	2539617	2542943	276175	279384	SPBC1861.04c	SPBC1348.03	prp24	SPBC1348.03	SPBC1861.04c	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445476528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776090	2541580	2542207	278077	278682	SPAC1687.05	SPAC17H9.10c	pli1	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.008002591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776091	2541580	2541562	278077	278061	SPAC1687.05	SPAC24B11.05	pli1	SPAC24B11.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51724262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776092	2541580	2540060	278077	276598	SPAC1687.05	SPBC106.01	pli1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.858569667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776093	2541580	2541512	278077	278013	SPAC1687.05	SPAC11E3.08c	pli1	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.054807121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776094	2541580	2542378	278077	278842	SPAC1687.05	SPAC1805.04	pli1	nup132	-	Nup133b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.158537844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776095	2541580	2543164	278077	279595	SPAC1687.05	SPAC3G6.06c	pli1	rad2	-	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781140827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776096	2541580	2540999	278077	277515	SPAC1687.05	SPBC4B4.04	pli1	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.628600984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776097	2541580	2540979	278077	277495	SPAC1687.05	SPBC3H7.10	pli1	elp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.334933675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776098	2541580	2542669	278077	279122	SPAC1687.05	SPAC29B12.08	pli1	clr5	-	SPAC29B12.08	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807653502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776099	2541580	2542627	278077	279081	SPAC1687.05	SPAC750.04c	pli1	SPAC750.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.62712296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776100	2541580	2543685	278077	280099	SPAC1687.05	SPAC3C7.03c	pli1	rad55	-	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.735575141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776101	2541580	2543584	278077	279999	SPAC1687.05	SPAPB1E7.11c	pli1	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.501410616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776102	2541580	2538906	278077	275483	SPAC1687.05	SPCC1259.03	pli1	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.850514429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776103	2541580	2541021	278077	277536	SPAC1687.05	SPBC3B8.10c	pli1	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.947035772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776104	2541580	2542036	278077	278518	SPAC1687.05	SPAC23A1.19c	pli1	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.750195814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776105	2541580	2539467	278077	276030	SPAC1687.05	SPCC417.07c	pli1	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453109151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776106	2541580	2540647	278077	277172	SPAC1687.05	SPBC18H10.07	pli1	SPBC18H10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.25616168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776107	2541580	2539667	278077	276222	SPAC1687.05	SPBC13G1.08c	pli1	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.56242082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776108	2541580	2542007	278077	278490	SPAC1687.05	SPAC20H4.07	pli1	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.204449262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776109	2541580	2539958	278077	276502	SPAC1687.05	SPBC1718.07c	pli1	zfs1	-	moc4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143538203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776110	2541580	2541614	278077	278111	SPAC1687.05	SPAC29A4.20	pli1	elp3	-	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.120866202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776111	2541580	2541017	278077	277532	SPAC1687.05	SPBC36.07	pli1	elp1	-	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.112314103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776112	2541580	2539354	278077	275920	SPAC1687.05	SPCC4F11.03c	pli1	SPCC4F11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327408018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776113	2541580	2539101	278077	275673	SPAC1687.05	SPCC736.04c	pli1	gma12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045455457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776114	2541580	2543670	278077	280084	SPAC1687.05	SPAPB1E7.06c	pli1	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.251246769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776115	2541580	2540498	278077	277026	SPAC1687.05	SPBC27.02c	pli1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.965823116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776116	2541580	2541432	278077	277937	SPAC1687.05	SPAC1F5.05c	pli1	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322006281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776117	2541580	2541531	278077	278031	SPAC1687.05	SPAC25A8.01c	pli1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.312177505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776118	2541580	2542418	278077	278881	SPAC1687.05	SPAC1805.07c	pli1	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.641849248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776119	2541580	2539375	278077	275941	SPAC1687.05	SPCC4G3.11	pli1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.938362249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776120	2541580	2539700	278077	276253	SPAC1687.05	SPBC1685.15c	pli1	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.285320565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776121	2541580	2543387	278077	279809	SPAC1687.05	SPAPB1E7.02c	pli1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.447057394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776122	2541580	2543448	278077	279868	SPAC1687.05	SPAC3H5.07	pli1	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641666775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776123	2541776	2539050	278270	275623	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC11E10.08	swd1	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51665439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776124	2541776	2540279	278270	276810	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC3B8.04c	swd1	SPBC3B8.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.190725012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776125	2541776	2540060	278270	276598	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC106.01	swd1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.4746577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776126	2541776	2542430	278270	278892	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC17G6.06	swd1	rps2401	-	rps24|rps24-1|rps24a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.268499572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776127	2541776	2538961	278270	275535	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC285.14	swd1	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.740791043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776128	2541776	2540105	278270	276642	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC106.04	swd1	ada1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.137343919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776129	2541776	2543637	278270	280051	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC3H8.02	swd1	csr102	-	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.455094337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776130	2541776	2541145	278270	277660	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC651.12c	swd1	dbl7	-	SPBC651.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.944608464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776131	2541776	2542066	278270	278543	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC227.05	swd1	SPAC227.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.122829017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776132	2541776	2539940	278270	276484	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC16A3.10	swd1	SPBC16A3.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.805869018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776133	2541776	2539167	278270	275738	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC1281.08	swd1	wtf11	-	meu24	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807134991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776134	2541776	2543064	278270	279497	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC3G6.01	swd1	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.45303301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776135	2541776	2539156	278270	275728	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC1450.08c	swd1	wtf16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331685449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776136	2541776	2541552	278270	278051	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC1142.08	swd1	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.127191214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776137	2541776	2541650	278270	278146	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC14C4.12c	swd1	laf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.054706133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776138	2541776	2538896	278270	275474	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC584.11c	swd1	SPCC584.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.862028682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776139	2541776	2542237	278270	278709	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC19E9.02	swd1	fin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.977280435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776140	2541776	2539930	278270	276474	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC1198.11c	swd1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.808670403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776141	2541776	3361561	278270	280637	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC11E3.01c	swd1	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.326481885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776142	2541776	2542747	278270	279197	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC15A10.06	swd1	SPAC15A10.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040726961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776143	2541776	2541345	278270	277856	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBP35G2.07	swd1	ilv1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.884750197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776144	2541776	2541681	278270	278177	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC14C4.01c	swd1	SPAC14C4.01c	-	SPAC19D5.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503184269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776145	2541776	2540139	278270	276676	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC1773.06c	swd1	adh8	-	SPBC1773.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094207015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776146	2541776	2540686	278270	277211	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC21D10.10	swd1	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.58048072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776147	2541776	2538922	278270	275499	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC16C4.10	swd1	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.810372676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776148	2541776	2540491	278270	277019	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC28E12.04	swd1	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.150658361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776149	2541776	2540664	278270	277189	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC215.02	swd1	bob1	-	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200109392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776150	2541776	2538806	278270	275387	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC1840.09	swd1	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046807197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776151	2541776	2540999	278270	277515	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC4B4.04	swd1	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.508848579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776152	2541776	2539226	278270	275796	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC16C4.20c	swd1	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.463898367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776153	2541776	2540975	278270	277491	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC354.12	swd1	gpd3	-	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.693600057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776154	2541776	2542107	278270	278583	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC30.01c	swd1	sec72	-	sec7b|sec702	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.985249546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776155	2541776	2542677	278270	279130	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC26F1.10c	swd1	pyp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.941992846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776156	2541776	2541013	278270	277528	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC3H7.13	swd1	far10	-	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.530342619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776157	2541776	2541012	278270	277527	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC3H7.12	swd1	rav2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446057723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776158	2541776	2543659	278270	280073	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC922.07c	swd1	atd2	-	SPAC922.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.822132744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776159	2541776	2538801	278270	275382	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC285.13c	swd1	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.742935419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776160	2541776	2541026	278270	277541	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC337.09	swd1	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.216725124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776161	2541776	2542555	278270	279012	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC1952.06c	swd1	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.563710013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776162	2541776	2540220	278270	276753	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC337.03	swd1	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.087640585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776163	2541776	2539797	278270	276347	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC16G5.14c	swd1	rps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.594970836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776164	2541776	2540929	278270	277445	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC354.03	swd1	swd3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.909690276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776165	2541776	2541346	278270	277857	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBP8B7.08c	swd1	ppm1	-	SPBP8B7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567344683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776166	2541776	2540993	278270	277509	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC342.01c	swd1	alg6	-	SPBC3F6.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51513224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776167	2541776	2540425	278270	276953	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC27.06c	swd1	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.054928632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776168	2541776	2542318	278270	278784	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC16C9.05	swd1	cph1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.799909399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776169	2541776	2541527	278270	278027	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC31A2.09c	swd1	apm4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708675757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776170	2541776	2542969	278270	279409	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC4G8.10	swd1	gos1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.177402668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776171	2541776	2542220	278270	278694	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC1A6.03c	swd1	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.012165678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776172	2541776	2543296	278270	279721	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC9E9.03	swd1	leu2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.821929828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776173	2541776	2540344	278270	276873	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC30D10.03c	swd1	SPBC30D10.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.620123071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776174	2541776	2541923	278270	278411	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC23C4.09c	swd1	SPAC23C4.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637752043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776175	2541776	2539244	278270	275814	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC1672.06c	swd1	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.182575441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776176	2541776	2543563	278270	279979	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC664.02c	swd1	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.043133996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776177	2541776	2542082	278270	278559	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC29B12.10c	swd1	pgt1	-	opt1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515008395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776178	2541776	2541416	278270	277923	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBCPT2R1.01c	swd1	SPBCPT2R1.01c	-	SPBPB2B2.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77785785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776179	2541776	2539352	278270	275918	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC188.07	swd1	ccq1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.70639348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776180	2541776	2539381	278270	275947	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC1739.10	swd1	mug33	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516835568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776181	2541776	2539092	278270	275664	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC1259.08	swd1	SPCC1259.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.159318532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776182	2541776	2541021	278270	277536	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC3B8.10c	swd1	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.80613113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776183	2541776	2542665	278270	279118	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC10F6.08c	swd1	nht10	-	nht1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.184372496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776184	2541776	2542568	278270	279024	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC1952.02	swd1	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.369161891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776185	2541776	2539023	278270	275596	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC594.05c	swd1	spf1	-	spp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.344554801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776186	2541776	2539467	278270	276030	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC417.07c	swd1	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321262704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776187	2541776	2538821	278270	275402	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC584.01c	swd1	SPCC584.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.993978273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776188	2541776	2541801	278270	278292	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC2F7.08c	swd1	snf5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.412924964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776189	2541776	2541250	278270	277764	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC8D2.17	swd1	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640850905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776190	2541776	2540892	278270	277408	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC530.01	swd1	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.346538025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776191	2541776	2542646	278270	279100	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC11H11.05c	swd1	fta6	-	sma6	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.891273449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776192	2541776	2541288	278270	277801	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBP35G2.04c	swd1	SPBP35G2.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.918502261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776193	2541776	2538770	278270	275353	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC1753.02c	swd1	git3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.857890512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776194	2541776	2540429	278270	276957	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC29A10.07	swd1	pom152	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.547473117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776195	2541776	2540922	278270	277438	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC36.10	swd1	SPBC36.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447131007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776196	2541776	2538706	278270	275290	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC338.08	swd1	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852236424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776197	2541776	2543412	278270	279834	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC637.07	swd1	moe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.700680698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776198	2541776	2540396	278270	276924	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC31F10.12	swd1	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.70378586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776199	2541776	2540673	278270	277198	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC1D7.03	swd1	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.910002364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776200	2541776	2541889	278270	278379	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC2F7.03c	swd1	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.650093952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776201	2541776	2542989	278270	279427	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC11E3.13c	swd1	gas5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513755619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776202	2541776	2543531	278270	279949	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC926.06c	swd1	SPAC926.06c	-	lrr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.372896786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776203	2541776	2539999	278270	276543	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC1734.15	swd1	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.326027815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776204	2541776	2541496	278270	277998	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC23D3.09	swd1	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.149130583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776205	2541776	2543667	278270	280081	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC4H3.02c	swd1	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.944988668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776206	2541776	2541166	278270	277681	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC725.15	swd1	ura5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.911919787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776207	2541776	2542877	278270	279322	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC13G6.15c	swd1	SPAC13G6.15c	-	SPAC24B11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.814081348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776208	2541776	2539857	278270	276404	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC1604.20c	swd1	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.78120091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776209	2541776	2542611	278270	279065	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC29A4.05	swd1	cam2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.909114657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776210	2541776	2541351	278270	277862	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBP4H10.14c	swd1	SPBP4H10.14c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.089078332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776211	2541776	2543406	278270	279828	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC9.12c	swd1	atp12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.261270119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776212	2541776	2538769	278270	275352	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC126.04c	swd1	sgf73	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.624138092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776213	2541776	2539667	278270	276222	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC13G1.08c	swd1	ash2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.780837258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776214	2541776	2542126	278270	278602	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC1B3.05	swd1	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77720771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776215	2541776	2539000	278270	275574	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC1450.06c	swd1	grx3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.314076062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776216	2541776	2540628	278270	277154	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC25B2.08	swd1	SPBC25B2.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923664659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776217	2541776	2540997	278270	277513	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC3H7.06c	swd1	pof9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.521961436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776218	2541776	2542976	278270	279414	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC9E9.09c	swd1	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.974018531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776219	2541776	2541326	278270	277838	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBP35G2.03c	swd1	sgo1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.884389999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776220	2541776	2540961	278270	277477	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC36B7.03	swd1	sec63	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037932528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776221	2541776	2539850	278270	276398	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC15D4.07c	swd1	atg9	-	apg9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814459386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776222	2541776	2539974	278270	276518	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC32H8.07	swd1	git5	-	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194976509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776223	2541776	2543236	278270	279664	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC8C9.04	swd1	SPAC8C9.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933486478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776224	2541776	2540394	278270	276922	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC2D10.09	swd1	snr1	-	SPBC2D10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.916644266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776225	2541776	2540077	278270	276615	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC17D11.04c	swd1	nto1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.41536434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776226	2541776	2538841	278270	275422	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC550.03c	swd1	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.394922908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776227	2541776	2539958	278270	276502	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC1718.07c	swd1	zfs1	-	moc4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923126074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776228	2541776	2542254	278270	278724	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC30D11.04c	swd1	nup124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.095898932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776229	2541776	2541900	278270	278390	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC23H4.17c	swd1	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.193395591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776230	2541776	2539408	278270	275973	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC576.12c	swd1	mhf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451651919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776231	2541776	2542855	278270	279301	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC144.04c	swd1	spe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.718438371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776232	2541776	2542519	278270	278977	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC19G12.08	swd1	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.563219851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776233	2541776	2539481	278270	276044	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC622.16c	swd1	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.166865119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776234	2541776	2540335	278270	276865	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC30B4.03c	swd1	adn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388439847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776235	2541776	2539119	278270	275691	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC1223.13	swd1	cbf12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814423145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776236	2541776	2538926	278270	275502	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC306.07c	swd1	SPCC306.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.165379274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776237	2541776	2543443	278270	279863	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC3H1.12c	swd1	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.988913186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776238	2541776	2539368	278270	275934	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC16A11.07	swd1	coq10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.88084001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776239	2541776	2539740	278270	276292	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC1685.04	swd1	SPBC1685.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985295988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776240	2541776	2540019	278270	276563	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC1685.01	swd1	pmp1	-	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.705230224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776241	2541776	2542125	278270	278601	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAP8A3.03	swd1	SPAP8A3.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.109148825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776242	2541776	2538708	278270	275292	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC594.01	swd1	SPCC594.01	-	SPCC736.16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.737334279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776243	2541776	2541536	278270	278036	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC1071.02	swd1	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.246374763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776244	2541776	2540201	278270	276734	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC13A2.04c	swd1	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933895531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776245	2541776	2541464	278270	277966	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC222.08c	swd1	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.327666045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776246	2541776	2541053	278270	277568	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC56F2.10c	swd1	alg5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.190225522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776247	2541776	2540967	278270	277483	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC36B7.08c	swd1	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.58087255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776248	2541776	2540016	278270	276560	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC1773.09c	swd1	mug184	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.85258749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776249	2541776	2540184	278270	276717	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC106.12c	swd1	SPBC106.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.723593677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776250	2541776	2541296	278270	277808	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBP8B7.06	swd1	rpp201	-	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852850222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776251	2541776	2539059	278270	275632	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC737.06c	swd1	SPCC737.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.396088175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776252	2541776	2540533	278270	277061	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC29A10.16c	swd1	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.761956244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776253	2541776	2543350	278270	279772	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC56E4.03	swd1	SPAC56E4.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32818446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776254	2541776	2539711	278270	276264	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC1683.09c	swd1	frp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.155821975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776255	2541776	2540357	278270	276886	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC2F12.05c	swd1	SPBC2F12.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.197867173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776256	2541776	2538884	278270	275462	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC1393.08	swd1	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.756169889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776257	2541776	3361105	278270	280181	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC188.10c	swd1	SPCC188.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.508860264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776258	2541776	2542255	278270	278725	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC57A7.08	swd1	pzh1	-	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.163997659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776259	2541776	2541337	278270	277848	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBP35G2.13c	swd1	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714877274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776260	2541776	2541378	278270	277889	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBP8B7.21	swd1	ubp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.294386754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776261	2541776	2542329	278270	278795	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC9G1.10c	swd1	SPAC9G1.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.389337248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776262	2541776	2543515	278270	279933	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC4F10.14c	swd1	btf3	-	btt1|egd1|nac2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982849559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776263	2541776	2542973	278270	279412	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC10F6.04	swd1	SPAC10F6.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.314055778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776264	2541776	2542602	278270	279056	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC186.09	swd1	SPAC186.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036300125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776265	2541776	2541713	278270	278208	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC3A12.12	swd1	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.403165583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776266	2541776	2540821	278270	277339	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC800.03	swd1	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.862512068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776267	2541776	2539706	278270	276259	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC16G5.13	swd1	ptf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388380143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776268	2541776	2539160	278270	275732	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC18.17c	swd1	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327489674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776269	2541776	2539842	278270	276390	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC14C8.15	swd1	SPBC14C8.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568925812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776270	2541776	2538762	278270	275345	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC306.04c	swd1	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.33562508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776271	2541776	2543619	278270	280033	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC4F10.04	swd1	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.504064009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776272	2541776	2540619	278270	277145	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC25H2.15	swd1	SPBC25H2.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.44836355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776273	2541776	2542767	278270	279217	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC1565.07c	swd1	knd1	-	SPAC1565.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.161689049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776274	2541776	2541175	278270	277689	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC839.13c	swd1	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.322036861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776275	2541776	2540061	278270	276599	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC119.12	swd1	rud3	-	SPBC119.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.626941919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776276	2541776	2539137	278270	275709	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC1682.08c	swd1	mcp2	-	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.900545699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776277	2541776	2540498	278270	277026	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC27.02c	swd1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.051966098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776278	2541776	2543674	278270	280088	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC637.13c	swd1	slm1	-	SPAC637.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.31209584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776279	2541776	2539925	278270	276469	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC16H5.13	swd1	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.173068595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776280	2541776	2540800	278270	277319	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC409.20c	swd1	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.589242603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776281	2541776	2542541	278270	278998	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC1B3.03c	swd1	wis2	-	cyp5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.390943932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776282	2541776	2538717	278270	275301	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC1235.02	swd1	bio2	-	SPCC320.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707623333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776283	2541776	2539246	278270	275816	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC18.13	swd1	SPCC18.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810947326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776284	2541776	2541372	278270	277883	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBP8B7.28c	swd1	stc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.722621503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776285	2541776	2541432	278270	277937	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC1F5.05c	swd1	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932946173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776286	2541776	2540725	278270	277248	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC215.14c	swd1	vps20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.000461185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776287	2541776	2540346	278270	276875	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC2F12.03c	swd1	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.667335581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776288	2541776	2540699	278270	277223	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC800.08	swd1	gcd10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504942938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776289	2541776	2540000	278270	276544	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC1683.13c	swd1	cha4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87966063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776290	2541776	2540677	278270	277202	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC21B10.03c	swd1	ath1	-	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.904217515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776291	2541776	2542826	278270	279273	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC13G6.09	swd1	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.839721961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776292	2541776	2539668	278270	276223	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC11B10.10c	swd1	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.925345199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776293	2541776	2541744	278270	278238	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC23A1.02c	swd1	SPAC23A1.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781489433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776294	2541776	2539928	278270	276472	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC1604.08c	swd1	imp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.82480866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776295	2541776	2539170	278270	275741	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC306.02c	swd1	SPCC306.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.202752649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776296	2541776	2539205	278270	275775	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC4B3.15	swd1	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.644962624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776297	2541776	3361511	278270	280587	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC23C4.08	swd1	rho3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931332105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776298	2541776	2542904	278270	279348	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC144.11	swd1	rps1102	-	rps11|rps11-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771012632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776299	2541776	2540380	278270	276909	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC1A4.05	swd1	blt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510721342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776300	2541776	2539920	278270	276464	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC119.08	swd1	pmk1	-	spm1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045224968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776301	2541776	2539375	278270	275941	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC4G3.11	swd1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.939213923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776302	2541776	2540551	278270	277078	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC23E6.01c	swd1	cxr1	-	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708582308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776303	2541776	2539178	278270	275749	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC1682.14	swd1	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985266286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776304	2541776	2539253	278270	275823	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC1827.03c	swd1	SPCC1827.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041237707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776305	2541776	3361360	278270	280436	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC1652.01	swd1	SPBC1652.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.762353284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776306	2541776	2539700	278270	276253	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC1685.15c	swd1	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.31502435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776307	2541776	2543384	278270	279806	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC637.06	swd1	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.266580145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776308	2541776	2543684	278270	280098	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC4G8.03c	swd1	SPAC4G8.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.997979073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776309	2541776	2543076	278270	279509	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC30C2.07	swd1	SPAC30C2.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.517989544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776310	2541776	2543070	278270	279503	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC2H10.02c	swd1	SPAC2H10.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462176202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776311	2541776	2538920	278270	275497	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC1840.05c	swd1	SPCC1840.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.879298834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776312	2541776	2541867	278270	278357	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC22E12.14c	swd1	sck2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.160715502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776313	2541776	2540165	278270	276700	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC1683.02	swd1	SPBC1683.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092905563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776314	2541776	2543333	278270	279756	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC694.02	swd1	SPAC694.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.334377038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776315	2541776	2538947	278270	275521	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC1682.12c	swd1	ubp16	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.146244938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776316	2541776	2538834	278270	275415	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC126.08c	swd1	SPCC126.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.433757249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776317	2541776	2538696	278270	275281	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC569.06	swd1	SPCC569.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.983150326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776318	2541776	2542314	278270	278780	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC16E8.06c	swd1	nop12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.030391914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776319	2541776	3361512	278270	280588	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC3C7.01c	swd1	sac12	-	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913339685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776320	2541776	2541062	278270	277577	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC660.11	swd1	tcg1	-	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.294732358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776321	2542306	2538939	278773	275514	SPAC29A4.11	SPCC1672.04c	rga3	SPCC1672.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.375773622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776322	2542306	3361210	278773	280286	SPAC29A4.11	SPBC16E9.16c	rga3	lsd90	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.379430095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776323	2542306	2543617	278773	280031	SPAC29A4.11	SPAC4A8.10	rga3	SPAC4A8.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.983934536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776324	2542306	3361499	278773	280575	SPAC29A4.11	SPAC25H1.09	rga3	mde5	-	SPAC4A8.01|meu30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450045478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776325	2542306	2541971	278773	278456	SPAC29A4.11	SPAC27F1.05c	rga3	SPAC27F1.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.660426968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776326	2542306	2542066	278773	278543	SPAC29A4.11	SPAC227.05	rga3	SPAC227.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.749725441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776327	2542306	2543291	278773	279716	SPAC29A4.11	SPAC9E9.04	rga3	SPAC9E9.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.74344073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776328	2542306	2542643	278773	279097	SPAC29A4.11	SPAC2C4.07c	rga3	dis32	-	SPAC2C4.07c|dis3L2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330361618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776329	2542306	2540524	278773	277052	SPAC29A4.11	SPBC21B10.08c	rga3	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.982399875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776330	2542306	2542293	278773	278761	SPAC29A4.11	SPAC17G8.14c	rga3	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388889532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776331	2542306	2540528	278773	277056	SPAC29A4.11	SPBC18H10.04c	rga3	sce3	-	tif48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.210592192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776332	2542306	2543590	278773	280005	SPAC29A4.11	SPAC4C5.03	rga3	SPAC4C5.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.976656169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776333	2542306	2543681	278773	280095	SPAC29A4.11	SPAC9.02c	rga3	SPAC9.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.813609463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776334	2542306	2540095	278773	276633	SPAC29A4.11	SPBC115.03	rga3	SPBC115.03	-	SPBC839.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770572201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776335	2542306	2542023	278773	278506	SPAC29A4.11	SPAC20H4.10	rga3	ufd2	-	SPAC145.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.816199638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776336	2542306	2539382	278773	275948	SPAC29A4.11	SPCC162.03	rga3	SPCC162.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.100539454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776337	2542306	2542180	278773	278655	SPAC29A4.11	SPAC589.07c	rga3	atg1801	-	atg18|atg18a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32507388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776338	2542306	2542530	278773	278988	SPAC29A4.11	SPAC1399.02	rga3	SPAC1399.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.39248807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776339	2542306	2541246	278773	277760	SPAC29A4.11	SPBC8E4.02c	rga3	SPBC8E4.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.558536873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776340	2542306	2540797	278773	277316	SPAC29A4.11	SPBC18H10.11c	rga3	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.26501197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776341	2542306	2542652	278773	279106	SPAC29A4.11	SPAC1687.15	rga3	gsk3	-	skp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.474976715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776342	2542306	2539046	278773	275619	SPAC29A4.11	SPCC1223.12c	rga3	meu10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.984918618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776343	2542306	2543667	278773	280081	SPAC29A4.11	SPAC4H3.02c	rga3	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.902086399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776344	2542306	2543406	278773	279828	SPAC29A4.11	SPAC9.12c	rga3	atp12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.983655315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776345	2542306	2539995	278773	276539	SPAC29A4.11	SPBC1105.09	rga3	ubc15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.007351474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776346	2542306	2540665	278773	277190	SPAC29A4.11	SPBC83.02c	rga3	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.606475162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776347	2542306	2538841	278773	275422	SPAC29A4.11	SPCC550.03c	rga3	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.138809408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776348	2542306	2543357	278773	279779	SPAC29A4.11	SPAC688.12c	rga3	SPAC688.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327439185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776349	2542306	2542612	278773	279066	SPAC29A4.11	SPACUNK4.15	rga3	SPACUNK4.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64798152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776350	2542306	2543311	278773	279735	SPAC29A4.11	SPAC977.15	rga3	SPAC977.15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926276228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776351	2542306	2540776	278773	277296	SPAC29A4.11	SPBC428.07	rga3	meu6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775801961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776352	2542306	2542437	278773	278899	SPAC29A4.11	SPAC17A5.01	rga3	pex6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323800525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776353	2542306	2541112	278773	277627	SPAC29A4.11	SPBC725.07	rga3	pex5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.993027703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776354	2542306	2540201	278773	276734	SPAC29A4.11	SPBC13A2.04c	rga3	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.120635862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776355	2542306	2540180	278773	276713	SPAC29A4.11	SPBC16D10.11c	rga3	rps1801	-	rps18-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516758333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776356	2542306	2540229	278773	276761	SPAC29A4.11	SPBC31F10.15c	rga3	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.25891016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776357	2542306	2542829	278773	279276	SPAC29A4.11	SPAC13D6.02c	rga3	byr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.396925527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776358	2542306	2540946	278773	277462	SPAC29A4.11	SPBC36.04	rga3	cys11	-	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51594321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776359	2542306	2541628	278773	278124	SPAC29A4.11	SPAC110.02	rga3	pds5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44649587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776360	2542306	2540519	278773	277047	SPAC29A4.11	SPBC21C3.14c	rga3	SPBC21C3.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.628297871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776361	2542306	2542767	278773	279217	SPAC29A4.11	SPAC1565.07c	rga3	knd1	-	SPAC1565.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.19084113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776362	2542306	2541931	278773	278419	SPAC29A4.11	SPAC6G9.16c	rga3	SPAC6G9.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.14289069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776363	2542306	2543304	278773	279728	SPAC29A4.11	SPAC6B12.12	rga3	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.835002162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776364	2542306	2540960	278773	277476	SPAC29A4.11	SPBC3D6.02	rga3	but2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.561163683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776365	2542306	2543329	278773	279752	SPAC29A4.11	SPAC56F8.02	rga3	SPAC56F8.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387219636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776366	2542306	2538916	278773	275493	SPAC29A4.11	SPCC16C4.17	rga3	mug123	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.905164875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776367	2542306	2542838	278773	279284	SPAC29A4.11	SPAC13G7.11	rga3	SPAC13G7.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.749831446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776368	2542306	2543370	278773	279792	SPAC29A4.11	SPAC630.07c	rga3	SPAC630.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454258935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776369	2542306	2543327	278773	279750	SPAC29A4.11	SPAC1D4.06c	rga3	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.688975765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776370	2542306	2538940	278773	275515	SPAC29A4.11	SPCC1620.07c	rga3	lnp1	-	SPCC1620.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045140273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776371	2542027	2543497	278509	279916	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC926.09c	php3	fas1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.463159901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776372	2542027	2542895	278509	279339	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC13G6.10c	php3	asl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.906986513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776373	2542027	2541902	278509	278392	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC27E2.07	php3	pvg2	-	mug53	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2627371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776374	2542027	2541475	278509	277977	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC24B11.09	php3	mpc2	-	SPAC24B11.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.743233031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776375	2542027	2542518	278509	278976	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC1B3.16c	php3	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505358487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776376	2542027	2540235	278509	276767	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC336.13c	php3	SPBC336.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099474974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776377	2542027	2541912	278509	278402	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC222.16c	php3	csn3	-	SPAC821.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.341636789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776378	2542027	2539684	278509	276239	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC16A3.16	php3	SPBC16A3.16	-	cwc27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.971746423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776379	2542027	2543064	278509	279497	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC3G6.01	php3	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.70037558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776380	2542027	2542443	278509	278905	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC17G6.13	php3	slt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040229258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776381	2542027	2540161	278509	276696	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC13E7.03c	php3	SPBC13E7.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.415459248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776382	2542027	5802945	278509	858083	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC19G12.16c	php3	adg2	-	SPAC23A1.01c|mug46	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842625281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776383	2542027	2542701	278509	279154	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC26H5.05	php3	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.344302156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776384	2542027	2542103	278509	278579	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC31G5.11	php3	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.616934797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776385	2542027	2542345	278509	278811	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC1705.02	php3	SPAC1705.02	-	SPAC1F2.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189525565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776386	2542027	2538806	278509	275387	SPAC23C11.08	SPCC1840.09	php3	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580698371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776387	2542027	2542107	278509	278583	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC30.01c	php3	sec72	-	sec7b|sec702	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980839888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776388	2542027	2542714	278509	279167	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC5H10.06c	php3	adh4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.233147973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776389	2542027	2543316	278509	279740	SPAC23C11.08	SPAPJ691.02	php3	SPAPJ691.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.748140802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776390	2542027	2541503	278509	278005	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC22A12.01c	php3	pso2	-	SPAC56F8.17c|snm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.693008732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776391	2542027	2541809	278509	278300	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC22A12.11	php3	dak1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.75428796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776392	2542027	2540463	278509	276991	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC2F12.15c	php3	pfa3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925756962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776393	2542027	2540727	278509	277250	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC1921.03c	php3	mex67	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985692422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776394	2542027	2540425	278509	276953	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC27.06c	php3	mgr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989536695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776395	2542027	2542318	278509	278784	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC16C9.05	php3	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569014709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776396	2542027	2541527	278509	278027	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC31A2.09c	php3	apm4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.836694733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776397	2542027	2542969	278509	279409	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC4G8.10	php3	gos1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385787851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776398	2542027	2542220	278509	278694	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC1A6.03c	php3	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.010881716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776399	2542027	2541522	278509	278023	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC23E2.01	php3	fep1	-	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.908415205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776400	2542027	2539100	278509	275672	SPAC23C11.08	SPCC330.12c	php3	sdh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330615307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776401	2542027	2541484	278509	277986	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC23D3.12	php3	SPAC23D3.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.747587316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776402	2542027	2540964	278509	277480	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC365.16	php3	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.143576397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776403	2542027	2542344	278509	278810	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC1751.01c	php3	gti1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385990344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776404	2542027	2542896	278509	279340	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC3F10.04	php3	gsa1	-	gsh2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.908716242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776405	2542027	2542679	278509	279132	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC12B10.07	php3	acp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812566702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776406	2542027	2541664	278509	278160	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC2H10.01	php3	SPAC2H10.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.153285348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776407	2542027	2542964	278509	279404	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC12G12.07c	php3	SPAC12G12.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.352747756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776408	2542027	2541615	278509	278112	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC27D7.11c	php3	SPAC27D7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992909591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776409	2542027	2542513	278509	278971	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC1952.05	php3	gcn5	-	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.630218254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776410	2542027	2540192	278509	276725	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC1215.01	php3	shy1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699947288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776411	2542027	2541982	278509	278467	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC23A1.06c	php3	cmk2	-	mkp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.983282089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776412	2542027	2541545	278509	278045	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC22F8.07c	php3	rtf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035372455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776413	2542027	2538770	278509	275353	SPAC23C11.08	SPCC1753.02c	php3	git3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.227959397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776414	2542027	2543483	278509	279903	SPAC23C11.08	SPAPB2B4.02	php3	grx5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.559284131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776415	2542027	2541038	278509	277553	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC29A10.01	php3	ccr1	-	SPBC365.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.867520744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776416	2542027	3361491	278509	280567	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC1805.08	php3	dlc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508456511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776417	2542027	2540150	278509	276687	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC16E9.14c	php3	zrg17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.694503274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776418	2542027	2541578	278509	278075	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC25B8.05	php3	deg1	-	SPAC25B8.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.378262057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776419	2542027	2543510	278509	279928	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC30D11.07	php3	nth1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.618285189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776420	2542027	2542921	278509	279362	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC1093.01	php3	ppr5	-	SPAC12B10.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.982494532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776421	2542027	2539999	278509	276543	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC1734.15	php3	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.813151696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776422	2542027	2541496	278509	277998	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC23D3.09	php3	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.205063932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776423	2542027	2539603	278509	276161	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC1289.06c	php3	ppr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.874567231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776424	2542027	2539250	278509	275820	SPAC23C11.08	SPCC1884.02	php3	nic1	-	SPCC757.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930890838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776425	2542027	2540772	278509	277292	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC216.04c	php3	mxr2	-	SPBC216.04c|MsrB	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321590075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776426	2542027	2542357	278509	278822	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC1782.07	php3	qcr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.985562375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776427	2542027	2542651	278509	279105	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC24C9.12c	php3	SPAC24C9.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378090514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776428	2542027	2540086	278509	276624	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC16H5.12c	php3	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.417384152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776429	2542027	2543406	278509	279828	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC9.12c	php3	atp12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.2192093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776430	2542027	2540326	278509	276856	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC2G5.06c	php3	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.676990451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776431	2542027	2538769	278509	275352	SPAC23C11.08	SPCC126.04c	php3	sgf73	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.892274908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776432	2542027	2539000	278509	275574	SPAC23C11.08	SPCC1450.06c	php3	grx3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327239704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776433	2542027	2542946	278509	279386	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC6F12.03c	php3	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.991217808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776434	2542027	2541607	278509	278104	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC24B11.10c	php3	cfh1	-	chr3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262109863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776435	2542027	2539974	278509	276518	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC32H8.07	php3	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.361802132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776436	2542027	2540836	278509	277354	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC18H10.19	php3	vps38	-	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.678116542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776437	2542027	2540232	278509	276764	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC336.10c	php3	tif512	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980252914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776438	2542027	2541241	278509	277755	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC887.17	php3	SPBC887.17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818571053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776439	2542027	2539958	278509	276502	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC1718.07c	php3	zfs1	-	moc4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452279599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776440	2542027	2542519	278509	278977	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC19G12.08	php3	scs7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.340593819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776441	2542027	2540387	278509	276915	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC24C6.04	php3	SPBC24C6.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570300098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776442	2542027	2539368	278509	275934	SPAC23C11.08	SPCC16A11.07	php3	coq10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.298875276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776443	2542027	2542720	278509	279171	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC25G10.05c	php3	his1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812673996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776444	2542027	2541464	278509	277966	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC222.08c	php3	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.80762681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776445	2542027	2542597	278509	279051	SPAC23C11.08	SPAP8A3.07c	php3	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.466288824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776446	2542027	2540599	278509	277125	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC29A3.10c	php3	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.932114524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776447	2542027	2541395	278509	277904	SPAC23C11.08	SPBP8B7.25	php3	cyp4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.920426161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776448	2542027	2541186	278509	277700	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC725.01	php3	SPBC725.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.695363014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776449	2542027	2541488	278509	277990	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC227.17c	php3	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.328234767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776450	2542027	2543515	278509	279933	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC4F10.14c	php3	btf3	-	btt1|egd1|nac2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808492278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776451	2542027	2539519	278509	276081	SPAC23C11.08	SPCC364.05	php3	vps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.618031309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776452	2542027	2542602	278509	279056	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC186.09	php3	SPAC186.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.442700137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776453	2542027	2543193	278509	279622	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC3F10.11c	php3	abc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779636851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776454	2542027	2541713	278509	278208	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC3A12.12	php3	atp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.463305212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776455	2542027	2539763	278509	276314	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC1861.05	php3	SPBC1861.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.815194085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776456	2542027	2539160	278509	275732	SPAC23C11.08	SPCC18.17c	php3	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.150545613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776457	2542027	2539499	278509	276062	SPAC23C11.08	SPCC622.08c	php3	hta1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.074517757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776458	2542027	2543051	278509	279486	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC1071.08	php3	rpp203	-	rla6|rpp2-3|rpa2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991840316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776459	2542027	2542516	278509	278974	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC2F7.04	php3	pmc2	-	med1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.266297616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776460	2542027	2539555	278509	276116	SPAC23C11.08	SPCC4B3.08	php3	lsg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.134011862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776461	2542027	2541909	278509	278399	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC227.01c	php3	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.47728345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776462	2542027	2542883	278509	279328	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC1486.04c	php3	alm1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992483459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776463	2542027	2539925	278509	276469	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC16H5.13	php3	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.68371889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776464	2542027	2540346	278509	276875	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC2F12.03c	php3	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776429714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776465	2542027	2539136	278509	275708	SPAC23C11.08	SPCC1919.05	php3	SPCC1919.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.458186415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776466	2542027	2541229	278509	277743	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC839.05c	php3	rps1701	-	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864913126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776467	2542027	2540297	278509	276828	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC24C6.08c	php3	bhd1	-	bhd	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.255262967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776468	2542027	2543633	278509	280047	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC3H8.05c	php3	mms1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.252974006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776469	2542027	2539736	278509	276288	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC12C2.12c	php3	glo1	-	SPBC21D10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.752181971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776470	2542027	2540333	278509	276863	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC21B10.07	php3	SPBC21B10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.255181743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776471	2542027	2542607	278509	279061	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC18B11.02c	php3	SPAC18B11.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.124083443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776472	2542027	2540380	278509	276909	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC1A4.05	php3	blt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38857794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776473	2542027	2543124	278509	279556	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC3A11.06	php3	mvp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.147293649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776474	2542027	2539375	278509	275941	SPAC23C11.08	SPCC4G3.11	php3	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.95993565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776475	2542027	2543486	278509	279906	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC959.07	php3	rps403	-	rps4|rps4-3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.021890526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776476	2542027	2539169	278509	275740	SPAC23C11.08	SPCC1235.11	php3	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.275676187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776477	2542027	2543387	278509	279809	SPAC23C11.08	SPAPB1E7.02c	php3	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638833088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776478	2542027	2538854	278509	275435	SPAC23C11.08	SPCP1E11.05c	php3	are2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.193620319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776479	2542027	2542886	278509	279331	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC1486.01	php3	SPAC1486.01	-	sod2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.006262168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776480	2542027	2543087	278509	279520	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC30C2.04	php3	SPAC30C2.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101043076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776481	2542027	2542175	278509	278650	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC1F3.02c	php3	mkh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98006434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776482	2542027	2542399	278509	278863	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC1805.10	php3	SPAC1805.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384212275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776483	2542027	2542424	278509	278886	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC1805.14	php3	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.458639204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776484	2542027	2541478	278509	277980	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC2F7.17	php3	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.127536382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776485	2542027	2539085	278509	275657	SPAC23C11.08	SPCC285.15c	php3	rps2802	-	rps28|rps28-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87509608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776486	2542027	2542700	278509	279153	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC26H5.08c	php3	bgl2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.220636395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776487	2542027	2543333	278509	279756	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC694.02	php3	SPAC694.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.122319718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776488	2542027	2542440	278509	278902	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC17A2.12	php3	rrp1	-	SPAC17A2.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98918567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776489	2542027	2540938	278509	277454	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC365.14c	php3	uge1	-	gal10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637334694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776490	2542027	2541576	278509	278073	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC1348.02	php3	SPBC1348.02	-	SPAC1348.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.556942385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776491	2542027	2541875	278509	278365	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC22F3.06c	php3	lon1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.259668717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776492	2542027	2540787	278509	277306	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC1921.07c	php3	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512442737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776493	2542027	2543024	278509	279460	SPAC23C11.08	SPAC1039.02	php3	SPAC1039.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318723218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776494	2540654	2542895	277179	279339	SPBC19F5.01c	SPAC13G6.10c	puc1	asl1	SPBP8B7.32c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810565424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776495	2540654	2540686	277179	277211	SPBC19F5.01c	SPBC21D10.10	puc1	bdc1	SPBP8B7.32c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.398528219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776496	2540654	2542677	277179	279130	SPBC19F5.01c	SPAC26F1.10c	puc1	pyp1	SPBP8B7.32c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.893376676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776497	2540654	2543542	277179	279959	SPBC19F5.01c	SPAC823.09c	puc1	SPAC823.09c	SPBP8B7.32c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877639149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776498	2540654	2540990	277179	277506	SPBC19F5.01c	SPBC36B7.06c	puc1	mug20	SPBP8B7.32c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640735295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776499	2540654	2539101	277179	275673	SPBC19F5.01c	SPCC736.04c	puc1	gma12	SPBP8B7.32c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.467266777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776500	2540654	2543619	277179	280033	SPBC19F5.01c	SPAC4F10.04	puc1	ypa1	SPBP8B7.32c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389784609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776501	2539500	2541257	276063	277771	SPCC61.03	SPBP23A10.14c	SPCC61.03	ell1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037183897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776502	2539500	2540789	276063	277308	SPCC61.03	SPBC19C2.06c	SPCC61.03	mug124	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928961237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776503	2539500	2539582	276063	276141	SPCC61.03	SPCC594.07c	SPCC61.03	bqt3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.250312802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776504	2539500	2539575	276063	276135	SPCC61.03	SPCP20C8.02c	SPCC61.03	SPCP20C8.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319942253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776505	2539500	2541311	276063	277823	SPCC61.03	SPBP8B7.09c	SPCC61.03	los1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985474858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776506	2539500	2541926	276063	278414	SPCC61.03	SPAC222.14c	SPCC61.03	SPAC222.14c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989900815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776507	2539500	2539952	276063	276496	SPCC61.03	SPBC1709.14	SPCC61.03	SPBC1709.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.9234724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776508	2539500	2541800	276063	278291	SPCC61.03	SPAC732.02c	SPCC61.03	SPAC732.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.562484407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776509	2539500	2542710	276063	279163	SPCC61.03	SPAC750.08c	SPCC61.03	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81188602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776510	2539500	2538767	276063	275350	SPCC61.03	SPCC1672.12c	SPCC61.03	get4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504006279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776511	2543686	2541818	280100	278309	SPAC3C7.14c	SPAC11G7.02	obr1	pub1	apt1|uhp1|p25	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809476935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776512	2543686	2543064	280100	279497	SPAC3C7.14c	SPAC3G6.01	obr1	hrp3	apt1|uhp1|p25	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.250465107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776513	2543686	2539023	280100	275596	SPAC3C7.14c	SPCC594.05c	obr1	spf1	apt1|uhp1|p25	spp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.243569451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776514	2543686	2543483	280100	279903	SPAC3C7.14c	SPAPB2B4.02	obr1	grx5	apt1|uhp1|p25	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.837635164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776515	2543686	2540673	280100	277198	SPAC3C7.14c	SPBC1D7.03	obr1	mug80	apt1|uhp1|p25	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.472797882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776516	2543686	2539293	280100	275861	SPAC3C7.14c	SPCC553.08c	obr1	ria1	apt1|uhp1|p25	SPCC553.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.216893454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776517	2543686	2543253	280100	279681	SPAC3C7.14c	SPAC8C9.05	obr1	SPAC8C9.05	apt1|uhp1|p25	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445404466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776518	2543686	2540946	280100	277462	SPAC3C7.14c	SPBC36.04	obr1	cys11	apt1|uhp1|p25	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452079886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776519	2539538	2542598	276100	279052	SPCC364.06	SPAC6G10.08	nap1	idp1	nap11	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930521805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776520	2539538	2543637	276100	280051	SPCC364.06	SPAC3H8.02	nap1	csr102	nap11	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.42427451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776521	2539538	2541512	276100	278013	SPCC364.06	SPAC11E3.08c	nap1	nse6	nap11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.443369424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776522	2539538	2541570	276100	278067	SPCC364.06	SPAC6G9.09c	nap1	rpl2401	nap11	rpl24|rpl24-01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38036577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776523	2539538	2540347	276100	276876	SPCC364.06	SPBC30B4.08	nap1	eri1	nap11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.989491621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776524	2539538	2543527	276100	279945	SPCC364.06	SPAC4C5.01	nap1	SPAC4C5.01	nap11	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.800030626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776525	2539538	2542701	276100	279154	SPCC364.06	SPAC26H5.05	nap1	mga2	nap11	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319897125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776526	2539538	2542273	276100	278742	SPCC364.06	SPAC17H9.13c	nap1	SPAC17H9.13c	nap11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.209278336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776527	2539538	2542689	276100	279142	SPCC364.06	SPAC29B12.04	nap1	snz1	nap11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573396897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776528	2539538	2542318	276100	278784	SPCC364.06	SPAC16C9.05	nap1	cph1	nap11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321361937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776529	2539538	2538906	276100	275483	SPCC364.06	SPCC1259.03	nap1	rpa12	nap11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.93321914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776530	2539538	2540893	276100	277409	SPCC364.06	SPBC543.10	nap1	get1	nap11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.436399303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776531	2539538	2542036	276100	278518	SPCC364.06	SPAC23A1.19c	nap1	hrq1	nap11	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.301260912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776532	2539538	2538770	276100	275353	SPCC364.06	SPCC1753.02c	nap1	git3	nap11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452660198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776533	2539538	2539628	276100	276185	SPCC364.06	SPBC1604.03c	nap1	SPBC1604.03c	nap11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.214894887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776534	2539538	2541889	276100	278379	SPCC364.06	SPAC2F7.03c	nap1	pom1	nap11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.907008353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776535	2539538	2543396	276100	279818	SPCC364.06	SPAC4D7.11	nap1	dsc4	nap11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.900058333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776536	2539538	2540326	276100	276856	SPCC364.06	SPBC2G5.06c	nap1	hmt2	nap11	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.808991802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776537	2539538	2538849	276100	275430	SPCC364.06	SPCC330.14c	nap1	rpl2402	nap11	rpl24-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380157364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776538	2539538	2539974	276100	276518	SPCC364.06	SPBC32H8.07	nap1	git5	nap11	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.814120563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776539	2539538	2540394	276100	276922	SPCC364.06	SPBC2D10.09	nap1	snr1	nap11	SPBC2D10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046421788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776540	2539538	2540967	276100	277483	SPCC364.06	SPBC36B7.08c	nap1	SPBC36B7.08c	nap11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.781574938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776541	2539538	2542597	276100	279051	SPCC364.06	SPAP8A3.07c	nap1	SPAP8A3.07c	nap11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.317903155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776542	2539538	2541488	276100	277990	SPCC364.06	SPAC227.17c	nap1	SPAC227.17c	nap11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.19187417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776543	2539538	2539812	276100	276362	SPCC364.06	SPBC1347.02	nap1	fkbp39	nap11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.353803999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776544	2539538	2541713	276100	278208	SPCC364.06	SPAC3A12.12	nap1	atp11	nap11	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.894382609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776545	2539538	2543619	276100	280033	SPCC364.06	SPAC4F10.04	nap1	ypa1	nap11	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.19903646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776546	2539538	2541175	276100	277689	SPCC364.06	SPBC839.13c	nap1	rpl1601	nap11	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.669311396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776547	2539538	2540800	276100	277319	SPCC364.06	SPBC409.20c	nap1	psh3	nap11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.541597272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776548	2539538	2543304	276100	279728	SPCC364.06	SPAC6B12.12	nap1	tom70	nap11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.94468359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776549	2539538	2543096	276100	279528	SPCC364.06	SPAC977.05c	nap1	SPAC977.05c	nap11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851695881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776550	2539538	2541531	276100	278031	SPCC364.06	SPAC25A8.01c	nap1	fft3	nap11	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.16096917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776551	2539538	2540699	276100	277223	SPCC364.06	SPBC800.08	nap1	gcd10	nap11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.441319678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776552	2539538	2542826	276100	279273	SPCC364.06	SPAC13G6.09	nap1	SPAC13G6.09	nap11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.323377272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776553	2539538	2542716	276100	279169	SPCC364.06	SPAC25H1.07	nap1	emc1	nap11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769804096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776554	2539538	2541709	276100	278204	SPCC364.06	SPAC3C7.02c	nap1	pil2	nap11	SPAC3C7.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.948350659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776555	2539538	2542424	276100	278886	SPCC364.06	SPAC1805.14	nap1	SPAC1805.14	nap11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.499675958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776556	2539538	2543372	276100	279794	SPCC364.06	SPAPB1A10.09	nap1	ase1	nap11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.383767962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776557	2539538	2541320	276100	277832	SPCC364.06	SPBC1271.03c	nap1	SPBC1271.03c	nap11	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.94327687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776558	2541470	2539050	277972	275623	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPCC11E10.08	rpb9	rik1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.418022826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776559	2541470	2540105	277972	276642	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC106.04	rpb9	ada1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.99245603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776560	2541470	2542598	277972	279052	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPAC6G10.08	rpb9	idp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780966203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776561	2541470	2538922	277972	275499	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPCC16C4.10	rpb9	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514811795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776562	2541470	2541082	277972	277597	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC577.11	rpb9	SPBC577.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.264785612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776563	2541470	2538806	277972	275387	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPCC1840.09	rpb9	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645999827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776564	2541470	2540043	277972	276581	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC1198.12	rpb9	mfr1	-	SPBC660.02|fzr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453300959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776565	2541470	2540999	277972	277515	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC4B4.04	rpb9	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.050126228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776566	2541470	2539420	277972	275985	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPCC970.07c	rpb9	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040513202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776567	2541470	2541208	277972	277722	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC887.04c	rpb9	lub1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981650773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776568	2541470	2538847	277972	275428	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPCC594.06c	rpb9	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099369964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776569	2541470	2540029	277972	276573	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC16A3.01	rpb9	spn3	-	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701540314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776570	2541470	2542669	277972	279122	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPAC29B12.08	rpb9	clr5	-	SPAC29B12.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6899073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776571	2541470	2542689	277972	279142	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPAC29B12.04	rpb9	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.685559499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776572	2541470	2540220	277972	276753	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC337.03	rpb9	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.432736304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776573	2541470	2543685	277972	280099	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPAC3C7.03c	rpb9	rad55	-	rhp55	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.510537281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776574	2541470	2540595	277972	277121	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC21C3.02c	rpb9	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580460761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776575	2541470	2543426	277972	279846	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPAC631.02	rpb9	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.853084635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776576	2541470	2542791	277972	279240	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPAC167.04	rpb9	pam17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925840188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776577	2541470	2539574	277972	276134	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPCPB16A4.04c	rpb9	trm8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994200558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776578	2541470	2540825	277972	277343	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC428.08c	rpb9	clr4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.525316105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776579	2541470	3361543	277972	280619	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPAC9.13c	rpb9	cwf16	-	SPAPJ735.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.112525996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776580	2541470	2541801	277972	278292	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPAC2F7.08c	rpb9	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.642419069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776581	2541470	2540892	277972	277408	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC530.01	rpb9	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.124422828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776582	2541470	2540150	277972	276687	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC16E9.14c	rpb9	zrg17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647801334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776583	2541470	2540886	277972	277403	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC4F6.10	rpb9	vps901	-	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32215032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776584	2541470	2541166	277972	277681	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC725.15	rpb9	ura5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.938098365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776585	2541470	2540831	277972	277349	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC428.02c	rpb9	eca39	-	SPBC582.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.072809112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776586	2541470	2540086	277972	276624	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC16H5.12c	rpb9	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.121728909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776587	2541470	2539667	277972	276222	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC13G1.08c	rpb9	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.817003315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776588	2541470	2542032	277972	278514	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPAC23C11.04c	rpb9	pnk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388219513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776589	2541470	2541900	277972	278390	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPAC23H4.17c	rpb9	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.155329871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776590	2541470	2540318	277972	276848	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC30B4.04c	rpb9	sol1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.644624435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776591	2541470	2543443	277972	279863	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPAC3H1.12c	rpb9	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.132993527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776592	2541470	2541708	277972	278203	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPAC31A2.02	rpb9	trm112	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.058712985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776593	2541470	2540967	277972	277483	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC36B7.08c	rpb9	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.967671842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776594	2541470	2541186	277972	277700	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC725.01	rpb9	SPBC725.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.841325241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776595	2541470	2543390	277972	279812	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPAC631.01c	rpb9	acp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643955972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776596	2541470	2540193	277972	276726	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC1289.10c	rpb9	adn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703913042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776597	2541470	2538848	277972	275429	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPCC613.12c	rpb9	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.083743516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776598	2541470	2541017	277972	277532	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC36.07	rpb9	elp1	-	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.50366821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776599	2541470	2540001	277972	276545	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC1289.13c	rpb9	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327057026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776600	2541470	2540442	277972	276970	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC25B2.04c	rpb9	mtg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.935128569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776601	2541470	2541175	277972	277689	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC839.13c	rpb9	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.158202249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776602	2541470	2540800	277972	277319	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC409.20c	rpb9	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.710668038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776603	2541470	2539246	277972	275816	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPCC18.13	rpb9	SPCC18.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.452606616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776604	2541470	2540699	277972	277223	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC800.08	rpb9	gcd10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.767425631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776605	2541470	2543427	277972	279847	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPAPB1A10.15	rpb9	arv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.438312199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776606	2541470	2539668	277972	276223	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC11B10.10c	rpb9	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780769229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776607	2541470	2541404	277972	277913	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBPB2B2.18	rpb9	SPBPB2B2.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.042153584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776608	2541470	2539928	277972	276472	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC1604.08c	rpb9	imp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387189178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776609	2541470	2540108	277972	276645	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC13E7.11	rpb9	rbd1	-	SPBC13E7.11|rh1|SPBC30D10.19c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382329268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776610	2541470	2541869	277972	278359	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPAC22F3.13	rpb9	tsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.348845263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776611	2541470	2543372	277972	279794	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPAPB1A10.09	rpb9	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.289714535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776612	2541470	2541529	277972	278029	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPAC1687.13c	rpb9	csn5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.993233447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776613	2541470	2540208	277972	276741	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC9B6.03	rpb9	SPBC9B6.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387293377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776614	2540880	2538801	277397	275382	SPBC582.03	SPCC285.13c	cdc13	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381047471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776615	2540880	2542597	277397	279051	SPBC582.03	SPAP8A3.07c	cdc13	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.616096408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776616	2540880	2539207	277397	275777	SPBC582.03	SPCC285.09c	cdc13	cgs2	-	pde1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.322464594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776617	2540880	2543448	277397	279868	SPBC582.03	SPAC3H5.07	cdc13	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384980724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776618	2540918	2538939	277434	275514	SPBC800.02	SPCC1672.04c	whi5	SPCC1672.04c	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.38343963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776619	2540918	2542577	277434	279033	SPBC800.02	SPAC19G12.15c	whi5	tpp1	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578351486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776620	2540918	2542080	277434	278557	SPBC800.02	SPAC27D7.03c	whi5	mei2	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.390683756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776621	2540918	2540833	277434	277351	SPBC800.02	SPBC18H10.20c	whi5	any1	mug54	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570492994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776622	2540918	2543291	277434	279716	SPBC800.02	SPAC9E9.04	whi5	SPAC9E9.04	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.252144451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776623	2540918	2543064	277434	279497	SPBC800.02	SPAC3G6.01	whi5	hrp3	mug54	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04183651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776624	2540918	2542747	277434	279197	SPBC800.02	SPAC15A10.06	whi5	SPAC15A10.06	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.71118765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776625	2540918	2538922	277434	275499	SPBC800.02	SPCC16C4.10	whi5	SPCC16C4.10	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.74866273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776626	2540918	2541891	277434	278381	SPBC800.02	SPAC1F8.03c	whi5	str3	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.880578338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776627	2540918	2539420	277434	275985	SPBC800.02	SPCC970.07c	whi5	raf2	mug54	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635189911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776628	2540918	2542050	277434	278529	SPBC800.02	SPAC212.02	whi5	SPAC212.02	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.838865569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776629	2540918	2542627	277434	279081	SPBC800.02	SPAC750.04c	whi5	SPAC750.04c	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770110503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776630	2540918	2539937	277434	276481	SPBC800.02	SPBC1539.08	whi5	arf6	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.131948615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776631	2540918	2543029	277434	279465	SPBC800.02	SPAC11G7.01	whi5	SPAC11G7.01	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189141116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776632	2540918	2539981	277434	276525	SPBC800.02	SPBC1289.09	whi5	tim21	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.699643363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776633	2540918	2543292	277434	279717	SPBC800.02	SPAC6C3.02c	whi5	SPAC6C3.02c	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3752673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776634	2540918	2538927	277434	275503	SPBC800.02	SPCC1795.09	whi5	yps1	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.042243103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776635	2540918	2540825	277434	277343	SPBC800.02	SPBC428.08c	whi5	clr4	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703738496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776636	2540918	2543349	277434	279771	SPBC800.02	SPAC977.02	whi5	SPAC977.02	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.104103984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776637	2540918	2542950	277434	279390	SPBC800.02	SPAC12B10.03	whi5	bun62	mug54	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330400794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776638	2540918	2540797	277434	277316	SPBC800.02	SPBC18H10.11c	whi5	ppr2	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.380270495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776639	2540918	2542964	277434	279404	SPBC800.02	SPAC12G12.07c	whi5	SPAC12G12.07c	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.088794932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776640	2540918	2541546	277434	278046	SPBC800.02	SPAC14C4.07	whi5	SPAC14C4.07	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.193754892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776641	2540918	2543412	277434	279834	SPBC800.02	SPAC637.07	whi5	moe1	mug54	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.261372259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776642	2540918	2541911	277434	278401	SPBC800.02	SPAC212.04c	whi5	SPAC212.04c	mug54	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193415267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776643	2540918	2540543	277434	277070	SPBC800.02	SPBC29A10.06c	whi5	ely5	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.733781224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776644	2540918	2542168	277434	278643	SPBC800.02	SPAC17A5.16	whi5	ftp105	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770436162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776645	2540918	2539484	277434	276047	SPBC800.02	SPCC594.04c	whi5	SPCC594.04c	mug54	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818262833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776646	2540918	2539603	277434	276161	SPBC800.02	SPBC1289.06c	whi5	ppr8	mug54	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926201564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776647	2540918	2540538	277434	277065	SPBC800.02	SPBC26H8.03	whi5	cho2	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771242135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776648	2540918	2541978	277434	278463	SPBC800.02	SPAC6G9.12	whi5	cfr1	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700836341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776649	2540918	2541588	277434	278085	SPBC800.02	SPAC1565.03	whi5	SPAC1565.03	mug54	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.273891044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776650	2540918	2543236	277434	279664	SPBC800.02	SPAC8C9.04	whi5	SPAC8C9.04	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636185973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776651	2540918	2541900	277434	278390	SPBC800.02	SPAC23H4.17c	whi5	srb10	mug54	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934303364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776652	2540918	2542549	277434	279006	SPBC800.02	SPAC19A8.11c	whi5	SPAC19A8.11c	mug54	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.266697265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776653	2540918	2540776	277434	277296	SPBC800.02	SPBC428.07	whi5	meu6	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.275805824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776654	2540918	2541112	277434	277627	SPBC800.02	SPBC725.07	whi5	pex5	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517391802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776655	2540918	2539498	277434	276061	SPBC800.02	SPCC645.11c	whi5	mug117	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.134982552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776656	2540918	2542973	277434	279412	SPBC800.02	SPAC10F6.04	whi5	SPAC10F6.04	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.788190214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776657	2540918	2542625	277434	279079	SPBC800.02	SPAC24H6.11c	whi5	SPAC24H6.11c	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.831297666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776658	2540918	2539245	277434	275815	SPBC800.02	SPCC1322.07c	whi5	mug150	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.83849544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776659	2540918	5802917	277434	858055	SPBC800.02	SPAC17A2.14	whi5	SPAC17A2.14	mug54	SPAC17G6.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.911225044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776660	2540918	2541121	277434	277636	SPBC800.02	SPBC609.03	whi5	iqw1	mug54	iqwd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.822224465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776661	2540918	2539770	277434	276321	SPBC800.02	SPBC1685.11	whi5	rlp1	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978112548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776662	2540918	2541531	277434	278031	SPBC800.02	SPAC25A8.01c	whi5	fft3	mug54	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.750337755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776663	2540918	2540182	277434	276715	SPBC800.02	SPBC16G5.06	whi5	SPBC16G5.06	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44304541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776664	2540918	2543420	277434	279842	SPBC800.02	SPAC3H1.04c	whi5	mdm31	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049399328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776665	2540918	2542303	277434	278770	SPBC800.02	SPAC1687.21	whi5	SPAC1687.21	mug54	SPAC222.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.913455071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776666	2540918	2541122	277434	277637	SPBC800.02	SPBC646.06c	whi5	agn2	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.072202564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776667	2540918	2539483	277434	276046	SPBC800.02	SPCC584.02	whi5	cuf2	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.938150045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776668	2540918	2540481	277434	277009	SPBC800.02	SPBC2D10.12	whi5	rhp23	mug54	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.981555514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776669	2540918	3361295	277434	280371	SPBC800.02	SPBC1921.01c	whi5	rpl35b	mug54	rpl37|rpl37-1|rpl3701|SPBC29C10.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935711216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776670	2540918	2541576	277434	278073	SPBC800.02	SPBC1348.02	whi5	SPBC1348.02	mug54	SPAC1348.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.841636355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776671	2540918	2540798	277434	277317	SPBC800.02	SPBC19C7.01	whi5	mni1	mug54	SPBC32F12.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.743836337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776672	2540918	2541260	277434	277774	SPBC800.02	SPBC902.05c	whi5	idh2	mug54	glu2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.025055342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776673	2540821	2542207	277339	278682	SPBC800.03	SPAC17H9.10c	clr3	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.409196072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776674	2540821	2539050	277339	275623	SPBC800.03	SPCC11E10.08	clr3	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.217639108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776675	2540821	2543529	277339	279947	SPBC800.03	SPAC4C5.02c	clr3	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321926253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776676	2540821	2542585	277339	279040	SPBC800.03	SPAC31A2.13c	clr3	sft1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568450145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776677	2540821	2541512	277339	278013	SPBC800.03	SPAC11E3.08c	clr3	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451321475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776678	2540821	2541633	277339	278129	SPBC800.03	SPAC664.01c	clr3	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.493457914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776679	2540821	2540686	277339	277211	SPBC800.03	SPBC21D10.10	clr3	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.116905108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776680	2540821	2539420	277339	275985	SPBC800.03	SPCC970.07c	clr3	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.366526804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776681	2540821	2542677	277339	279130	SPBC800.03	SPAC26F1.10c	clr3	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.872651138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776682	2540821	2540979	277339	277495	SPBC800.03	SPBC3H7.10	clr3	elp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.763736606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776683	2540821	2542689	277339	279142	SPBC800.03	SPAC29B12.04	clr3	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.320337968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776684	2540821	2540945	277339	277461	SPBC800.03	SPBC342.06c	clr3	rtt109	-	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.474627586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776685	2540821	2539434	277339	275997	SPBC800.03	SPCC757.09c	clr3	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.795741011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776686	2540821	2542627	277339	279081	SPBC800.03	SPAC750.04c	clr3	SPAC750.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642020209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776687	2540821	2542022	277339	278505	SPBC800.03	SPAC23A1.03	clr3	apt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.559309257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776688	2540821	2542135	277339	278611	SPBC800.03	SPAC13A11.04c	clr3	ubp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.809629336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776689	2540821	2542318	277339	278784	SPBC800.03	SPAC16C9.05	clr3	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.01058972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776690	2540821	2542023	277339	278506	SPBC800.03	SPAC20H4.10	clr3	ufd2	-	SPAC145.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.555010847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776691	2540821	2543685	277339	280099	SPBC800.03	SPAC3C7.03c	clr3	rad55	-	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.190569757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776692	2540821	2539244	277339	275814	SPBC800.03	SPCC1672.06c	clr3	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.466590242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776693	2540821	2541004	277339	277519	SPBC800.03	SPBC3F6.01c	clr3	SPBC3F6.01c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984226548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776694	2540821	2542981	277339	279419	SPBC800.03	SPAC824.02	clr3	bst1	-	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387654588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776695	2540821	2542568	277339	279024	SPBC800.03	SPAC1952.02	clr3	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.786894636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776696	2540821	2542239	277339	278711	SPBC800.03	SPAC18G6.02c	clr3	chp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.592773321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776697	2540821	2539023	277339	275596	SPBC800.03	SPCC594.05c	clr3	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.764044882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776698	2540821	2541776	277339	278270	SPBC800.03	SPAC23H3.05c	clr3	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.862512068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776699	2540821	2538770	277339	275353	SPBC800.03	SPCC1753.02c	clr3	git3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.691642669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776700	2540821	2538706	277339	275290	SPBC800.03	SPCC338.08	clr3	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.032290089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776701	2540821	2540352	277339	276881	SPBC800.03	SPBC215.03c	clr3	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.833521284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776702	2540821	2543643	277339	280057	SPBC800.03	SPAC3G9.07c	clr3	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.056559937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776703	2540821	2541899	277339	278389	SPBC800.03	SPAC22E12.11c	clr3	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.819473903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776704	2540821	2538769	277339	275352	SPBC800.03	SPCC126.04c	clr3	sgf73	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.84413917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776705	2540821	2539667	277339	276222	SPBC800.03	SPBC13G1.08c	clr3	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.016648548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776706	2540821	2542007	277339	278490	SPBC800.03	SPAC20H4.07	clr3	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.125435425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776707	2540821	2542976	277339	279414	SPBC800.03	SPAC9E9.09c	clr3	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.325202846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776708	2540821	2539974	277339	276518	SPBC800.03	SPBC32H8.07	clr3	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769227732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776709	2540821	2541720	277339	278214	SPBC800.03	SPAC23H3.13c	clr3	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.623502132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776710	2540821	2539481	277339	276044	SPBC800.03	SPCC622.16c	clr3	epe1	-	kdm2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.081353475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776711	2540821	2543443	277339	279863	SPBC800.03	SPAC3H1.12c	clr3	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.290197521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776712	2540821	2541614	277339	278111	SPBC800.03	SPAC29A4.20	clr3	elp3	-	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.101461026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776713	2540821	2538690	277339	275275	SPBC800.03	SPCC1393.05	clr3	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.694148782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776714	2540821	2538848	277339	275429	SPBC800.03	SPCC613.12c	clr3	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.019871065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776715	2540821	2542806	277339	279254	SPBC800.03	SPAC1610.01	clr3	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.821293673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776716	2540821	2538762	277339	275345	SPBC800.03	SPCC306.04c	clr3	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.565646739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776717	2540821	2543619	277339	280033	SPBC800.03	SPAC4F10.04	clr3	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.468256392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776718	2540821	2539925	277339	276469	SPBC800.03	SPBC16H5.13	clr3	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.757965947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776719	2540821	2540800	277339	277319	SPBC800.03	SPBC409.20c	clr3	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.08372389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776720	2540821	2542418	277339	278881	SPBC800.03	SPAC1805.07c	clr3	dad2	-	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.261765822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776721	2540821	2539928	277339	276472	SPBC800.03	SPBC1604.08c	clr3	imp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575429112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776722	2540821	2539375	277339	275941	SPBC800.03	SPCC4G3.11	clr3	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.741838821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776723	2540821	2540146	277339	276683	SPBC800.03	SPBC17A3.06	clr3	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.858237387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776724	2540821	2541675	277339	278171	SPBC800.03	SPAC22F8.12c	clr3	shf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.215709599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776725	2540865	2538939	277382	275514	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC1672.04c	usp102	SPCC1672.04c	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.36146047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776726	2540865	2539774	277382	276325	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC17A3.10	usp102	pas4	mud1|U1A	pi036	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.512889626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776727	2540865	2538721	277382	275305	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC1494.10	usp102	adn3	mud1|U1A	SPCC70.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.950833153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776728	2540865	2542577	277382	279033	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC19G12.15c	usp102	tpp1	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.429824359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776729	2540865	2542598	277382	279052	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC6G10.08	usp102	idp1	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.051915243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776730	2540865	2542382	277382	278846	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC6G10.06	usp102	SPAC6G10.06	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713842843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776731	2540865	2541512	277382	278013	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC11E3.08c	usp102	nse6	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.095029904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776732	2540865	2542372	277382	278836	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC1F3.03	usp102	SPAC1F3.03	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.838963233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776733	2540865	2539566	277382	276126	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC736.13	usp102	SPCC736.13	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.902474644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776734	2540865	2541145	277382	277660	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC651.12c	usp102	dbl7	mud1|U1A	SPBC651.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.663784598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776735	2540865	2543152	277382	279584	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC869.03c	usp102	SPAC869.03c	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870305924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776736	2540865	2539452	277382	276015	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC70.03c	usp102	SPCC70.03c	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.058513734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776737	2540865	2541570	277382	278067	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC6G9.09c	usp102	rpl2401	mud1|U1A	rpl24|rpl24-01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.415487001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776738	2540865	2543291	277382	279716	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC9E9.04	usp102	SPAC9E9.04	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.269617186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776739	2540865	2539167	277382	275738	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC1281.08	usp102	wtf11	mud1|U1A	meu24	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.17831405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776740	2540865	2539165	277382	275736	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC1281.04	usp102	SPCC1281.04	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.198856219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776741	2540865	2541015	277382	277530	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC409.08	usp102	SPBC409.08	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.257533964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776742	2540865	2542671	277382	279124	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC824.09c	usp102	SPAC824.09c	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.415241168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776743	2540865	2541032	277382	277547	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC3H7.11	usp102	SPBC3H7.11	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874599094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776744	2540865	2539156	277382	275728	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC1450.08c	usp102	wtf16	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.057033765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776745	2540865	2542928	277382	279369	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC1142.06	usp102	get3	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769488772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776746	2540865	2542787	277382	279236	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC9G1.08c	usp102	SPAC9G1.08c	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869640071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776747	2540865	2540524	277382	277052	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC21B10.08c	usp102	SPBC21B10.08c	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.913033997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776748	2540865	2542358	277382	278823	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC1782.09c	usp102	clp1	mud1|U1A	flp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86673708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776749	2540865	2541650	277382	278146	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC14C4.12c	usp102	laf1	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.844918398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776750	2540865	2542378	277382	278842	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC1805.04	usp102	nup132	mud1|U1A	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.90976576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776751	2540865	2538985	277382	275559	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC13B11.03c	usp102	SPCC13B11.03c	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.257805408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776752	2540865	2538993	277382	275567	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC162.12	usp102	tco89	mud1|U1A	SPCC1753.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.384002174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776753	2540865	2539202	277382	275773	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC162.10	usp102	ppk33	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.264021737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776754	2540865	2539876	277382	276422	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC1734.07c	usp102	trs8502	mud1|U1A	SPBC1734.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147702953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776755	2540865	3361561	277382	280637	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC11E3.01c	usp102	swr1	mud1|U1A	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.063691068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776756	2540865	2538929	277382	275505	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC162.02c	usp102	SPCC162.02c	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.971093329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776757	2540865	2541822	277382	278313	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC1F7.10	usp102	SPAC1F7.10	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097197986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776758	2540865	2541853	277382	278344	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC2F3.11	usp102	SPAC2F3.11	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.302306445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776759	2540865	2541856	277382	278347	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC23H3.08c	usp102	bub3	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.498476577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776760	2540865	2541117	277382	277632	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC646.13	usp102	sds23	mud1|U1A	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.971237332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776761	2540865	2541633	277382	278129	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC664.01c	usp102	swi6	mud1|U1A	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.971841395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776762	2540865	2543572	277382	279987	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC4G8.04	usp102	SPAC4G8.04	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.99152294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776763	2540865	2540168	277382	276703	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC1683.06c	usp102	SPBC1683.06c	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.073255853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776764	2540865	2543652	277382	280066	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC4H3.03c	usp102	SPAC4H3.03c	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.134848984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776765	2540865	2543434	277382	279854	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC8F11.02c	usp102	dph3	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.917957149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776766	2540865	5802945	277382	858083	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC19G12.16c	usp102	adg2	mud1|U1A	SPAC23A1.01c|mug46	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392587828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776767	2540865	2542614	277382	279068	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC1399.04c	usp102	SPAC1399.04c	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.914973045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776768	2540865	2542103	277382	278579	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC31G5.11	usp102	pac2	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.678257205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776769	2540865	2543270	277382	279698	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC1002.02	usp102	pom34	mud1|U1A	mug31	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152742125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776770	2540865	2542345	277382	278811	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC1705.02	usp102	SPAC1705.02	mud1|U1A	SPAC1F2.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.125787413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776771	2540865	2542040	277382	278521	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC212.01c	usp102	SPAC212.01c	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981247314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776772	2540865	2542316	277382	278782	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC16C9.02c	usp102	SPAC16C9.02c	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152791131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776773	2540865	2539208	277382	275778	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC1450.11c	usp102	cek1	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.981629184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776774	2540865	3361436	277382	280512	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC1296.01c	usp102	SPAC1296.01c	mud1|U1A	SPAC22F3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.971486245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776775	2540865	2543661	277382	280075	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC644.08	usp102	SPAC644.08	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.511688013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776776	2540865	2541795	277382	278286	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC2E1P3.02c	usp102	amt3	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.613218164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776777	2540865	2539579	277382	276138	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCP31B10.05	usp102	tdp1	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867437016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776778	2540865	2542468	277382	278929	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC1D4.09c	usp102	rtf2	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.774225232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776779	2540865	2542677	277382	279130	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC26F1.10c	usp102	pyp1	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.907045681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776780	2540865	2541012	277382	277527	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC3H7.12	usp102	rav2	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77036883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776781	2540865	2539970	277382	276514	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC1773.01	usp102	far8	mud1|U1A	SPBC1773.01|csc3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989708459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776782	2540865	2538847	277382	275428	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC594.06c	usp102	SPCC594.06c	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.73973248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776783	2540865	2541471	277382	277973	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC1F5.03c	usp102	SPAC1F5.03c	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143247741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776784	2540865	2538775	277382	275357	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC23B6.05c	usp102	ssb3	mud1|U1A	rpa3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.412956106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776785	2540865	2541092	277382	277607	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC660.12c	usp102	egt2	mud1|U1A	SPBC660.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.345472528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776786	2540865	2542816	277382	279263	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC4G8.11c	usp102	atp10	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32049197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776787	2540865	2541058	277382	277573	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC3H7.09	usp102	erf2	mud1|U1A	mug142	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994526311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776788	2540865	2541682	277382	278178	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC15F9.02	usp102	seh1	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.461307628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776789	2540865	2539564	277382	276125	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC550.12	usp102	arp6	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.617189043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776790	2540865	2539463	277382	276026	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC550.11	usp102	SPCC550.11	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.764256014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776791	2540865	2543590	277382	280005	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC4C5.03	usp102	SPAC4C5.03	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.646786181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776792	2540865	2542156	277382	278632	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC57A7.07c	usp102	SPAC57A7.07c	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.617441798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776793	2540865	2542299	277382	278766	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC18B11.10	usp102	tup11	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934018581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776794	2540865	2542724	277382	279175	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC767.01c	usp102	vps1	mud1|U1A	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.986016961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776795	2540865	2539334	277382	275900	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC285.05	usp102	SPCC285.05	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.853231763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776796	2540865	2539434	277382	275997	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC757.09c	usp102	rnc1	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.647613023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776797	2540865	2541026	277382	277541	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC337.09	usp102	erg28	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319191489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776798	2540865	2540313	277382	276843	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC337.04	usp102	ppk27	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852011192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776799	2540865	2540220	277382	276753	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC337.03	usp102	rhn1	mud1|U1A	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.192832134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776800	2540865	2541781	277382	278274	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC23G3.07c	usp102	snf30	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.207257444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776801	2540865	2542335	277382	278801	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC16E8.12c	usp102	png3	mud1|U1A	SPAC16E8.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.071914744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776802	2540865	2539937	277382	276481	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC1539.08	usp102	arf6	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.507695282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776803	2540865	2543547	277382	279964	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC926.02	usp102	SPAC926.02	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.177409499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776804	2540865	2541998	277382	278482	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC23A1.09	usp102	SPAC23A1.09	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980189852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776805	2540865	2540727	277382	277250	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC1921.03c	usp102	mex67	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.78916343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776806	2540865	2542165	277382	278641	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC1782.08c	usp102	rex3	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.333979343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776807	2540865	2541227	277382	277741	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC947.05c	usp102	frp2	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.933488341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776808	2540865	2541323	277382	277835	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBP35G2.14	usp102	SPBP35G2.14	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.004326286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776809	2540865	2542135	277382	278611	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC13A11.04c	usp102	ubp8	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809501352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776810	2540865	2542318	277382	278784	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC16C9.05	usp102	cph1	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.288363423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776811	2540865	2541527	277382	278027	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC31A2.09c	usp102	apm4	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.11752757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776812	2540865	2542277	277382	278746	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC17A5.02c	usp102	dbr1	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.361871818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776813	2540865	2541866	277382	278356	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC23H3.11c	usp102	SPAC23H3.11c	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986168924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776814	2540865	2543308	277382	279732	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC694.04c	usp102	SPAC694.04c	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.690340468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776815	2540865	2539175	277382	275746	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC16C4.01	usp102	sif2	mud1|U1A	SPCC5E4.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874115941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776816	2540865	2539129	277382	275701	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC338.14	usp102	ado1	mud1|U1A	SPCC338.14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196428469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776817	2540865	2542141	277382	278617	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC17C9.05c	usp102	pmc3	mud1|U1A	med27|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.236032087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776818	2540865	2542246	277382	278716	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC17H9.12c	usp102	SPAC17H9.12c	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.686859299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776819	2540865	2543108	277382	279540	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC3A12.13c	usp102	SPAC3A12.13c	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196377454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776820	2540865	2539820	277382	276370	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC1709.13c	usp102	set10	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330287616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776821	2540865	2543563	277382	279979	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC664.02c	usp102	arp8	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.267310573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776822	2540865	2538866	277382	275446	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC1620.12c	usp102	SPCC1620.12c	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.283275321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776823	2540865	2539197	277382	275768	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC24B10.14c	usp102	xlf1	mud1|U1A	mug104|nej1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319971348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776824	2540865	2541416	277382	277923	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBCPT2R1.01c	usp102	SPBCPT2R1.01c	mud1|U1A	SPBPB2B2.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440680238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776825	2540865	2539100	277382	275672	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC330.12c	usp102	sdh3	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.643157462	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776826	2540865	2540415	277382	276943	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC30B4.06c	usp102	SPBC30B4.06c	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776228798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776827	2540865	2543319	277382	279743	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC6B12.09	usp102	trm10	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.421818055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776828	2540865	2541663	277382	278159	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC22G7.08	usp102	ppk8	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.228098767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776829	2540865	2538972	277382	275546	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC1739.15	usp102	wtf21	mud1|U1A	wtf3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.692703125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776830	2540865	2539381	277382	275947	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC1739.10	usp102	mug33	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511501171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776831	2540865	2538906	277382	275483	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC1259.03	usp102	rpa12	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.96851192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776832	2540865	2542253	277382	278723	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC17H9.04c	usp102	SPAC17H9.04c	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.013505146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776833	2540865	2542845	277382	279291	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC824.04	usp102	SPAC824.04	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.688806323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776834	2540865	2540825	277382	277343	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC428.08c	usp102	clr4	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.341418395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776835	2540865	3361543	277382	280619	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC9.13c	usp102	cwf16	mud1|U1A	SPAPJ735.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509395336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776836	2540865	2541683	277382	278179	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC22G7.03	usp102	SPAC22G7.03	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.71910609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776837	2540865	2542558	277382	279014	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC1952.07	usp102	rad1	mud1|U1A	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.772325854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776838	2540865	2539310	277382	275877	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC285.17	usp102	spp27	mud1|U1A	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.028596112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776839	2540865	2542554	277382	279011	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC1952.03	usp102	otu2	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.14780627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776840	2540865	2542568	277382	279024	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC1952.02	usp102	tma23	mud1|U1A	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.719607191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776841	2540865	2542239	277382	278711	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC18G6.02c	usp102	chp1	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643833756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776842	2540865	2541544	277382	278044	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC22G7.06c	usp102	ura1	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378272354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776843	2540865	2539032	277382	275605	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC4B3.05c	usp102	hem12	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.611602822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776844	2540865	2543514	277382	279932	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC4D7.03	usp102	pop2	mud1|U1A	sud1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.596238012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776845	2540865	2538876	277382	275455	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC4B3.02c	usp102	SPCC4B3.02c	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913154199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776846	2540865	2539051	277382	275624	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC1183.11	usp102	msy1	mud1|U1A	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.672249713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776847	2540865	2542950	277382	279390	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC12B10.03	usp102	bun62	mud1|U1A	wdr20	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.266462822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776848	2540865	2541741	277382	278235	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC20G4.02c	usp102	fus1	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452523221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776849	2540865	2543020	277382	279456	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC10F6.13c	usp102	SPAC10F6.13c	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.903912992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776850	2540865	2539870	277382	276416	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC1709.18	usp102	tif452	mud1|U1A	SPBC409.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703233532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776851	2540865	2542964	277382	279404	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC12G12.07c	usp102	SPAC12G12.07c	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714099698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776852	2540865	2543102	277382	279534	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC31G5.21	usp102	SPAC31G5.21	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04524067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776853	2540865	2542513	277382	278971	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC1952.05	usp102	gcn5	mud1|U1A	kat2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.41181175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776854	2540865	2543511	277382	279929	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC4G9.19	usp102	SPAC4G9.19	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.924598914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776855	2540865	2541754	277382	278248	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC2E1P3.04	usp102	cao1	mud1|U1A	spao1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.763074959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776856	2540865	2543385	277382	279807	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC4G9.12	usp102	SPAC4G9.12	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988363082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776857	2540865	2542707	277382	279160	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC25G10.03	usp102	zip1	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870215209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776858	2540865	2543445	277382	279865	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC4F10.13c	usp102	mpd2	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978731737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776859	2540865	2539340	277382	275906	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC1906.04	usp102	wtf20	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641234468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776860	2540865	2541160	277382	277675	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC725.09c	usp102	hob3	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.987250367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776861	2540865	3361491	277382	280567	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC1805.08	usp102	dlc1	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.487147792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776862	2540865	2540922	277382	277438	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC36.10	usp102	SPBC36.10	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038620952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776863	2540865	2539990	277382	276534	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC1289.14	usp102	SPBC1289.14	mud1|U1A	SPBC8E4.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.187634304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776864	2540865	2542123	277382	278599	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC18G6.15	usp102	mal3	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.847182595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776865	2540865	2542699	277382	279152	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC5H10.07	usp102	SPAC5H10.07	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.741574391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776866	2540865	2543412	277382	279834	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC637.07	usp102	moe1	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.410997141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776867	2540865	2539733	277382	276285	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC16E9.12c	usp102	pab2	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38237696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776868	2540865	2538800	277382	275381	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC1322.06	usp102	kap113	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.051990679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776869	2540865	2541578	277382	278075	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC25B8.05	usp102	deg1	mud1|U1A	SPAC25B8.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.433002091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776870	2540865	2542989	277382	279427	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC11E3.13c	usp102	gas5	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327585035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776871	2540865	2541435	277382	277940	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC2E1P5.02c	usp102	mug109	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.339547251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776872	2540865	2543283	277382	279709	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC6C3.04	usp102	cit1	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.259350703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776873	2540865	2542235	277382	278707	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC18G6.05c	usp102	SPAC18G6.05c	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044625813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776874	2540865	2542873	277382	279318	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC9G1.02	usp102	wis4	mud1|U1A	wak1|wik1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.328507168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776875	2540865	2541701	277382	278197	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC1296.03c	usp102	sxa2	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.073383611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776876	2540865	2539454	277382	276017	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC622.15c	usp102	SPCC622.15c	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.640863193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776877	2540865	2541166	277382	277681	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC725.15	usp102	ura5	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.508948664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776878	2540865	2543358	277382	279780	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC688.10	usp102	rev3	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.663651485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776879	2540865	2538871	277382	275450	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC1259.14c	usp102	meu27	mud1|U1A	B8647-6	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.545077966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776880	2540865	3361455	277382	280531	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC1782.01	usp102	ecm29	mud1|U1A	SPAPYUG7.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.285417466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776881	2540865	2541532	277382	278032	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC2C4.15c	usp102	ubx2	mud1|U1A	ucp13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.610991736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776882	2540865	2541899	277382	278389	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC22E12.11c	usp102	set3	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.271899081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776883	2540865	2540831	277382	277349	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC428.02c	usp102	eca39	mud1|U1A	SPBC582.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511593121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776884	2540865	2542193	277382	278668	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC9G1.11c	usp102	spn4	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.051598671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776885	2540865	2539233	277382	275803	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC16A11.03c	usp102	SPCC16A11.03c	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.124974448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776886	2540865	2538890	277382	275468	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC1393.02c	usp102	spt2	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.132610231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776887	2540865	2539586	277382	276145	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC70.08c	usp102	SPCC70.08c	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867490678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776888	2540865	2540086	277382	276624	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC16H5.12c	usp102	SPBC16H5.12c	mud1|U1A	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818317462	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776889	2540865	2541739	277382	278233	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC2G11.10c	usp102	SPAC2G11.10c	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.203745929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776890	2540865	2541824	277382	278315	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC27E2.02	usp102	SPAC27E2.02	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.130959798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776891	2540865	2542409	277382	278873	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC17G8.10c	usp102	dma1	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868323496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776892	2540865	2541401	277382	277910	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBPB10D8.05c	usp102	SPBPB10D8.05c	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811345535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776893	2540865	2542007	277382	278490	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC20H4.07	usp102	rad57	mud1|U1A	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.829184219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776894	2540865	2538970	277382	275544	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC306.10	usp102	wtf8	mud1|U1A	wtf3-pseudo	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.824806425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776895	2540865	2543244	277382	279672	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC6B12.06c	usp102	rrg9	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.282522998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776896	2540865	2539482	277382	276045	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC417.06c	usp102	mug27	mud1|U1A	ppk35|slk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.344521691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776897	2540865	2541326	277382	277838	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBP35G2.03c	usp102	sgo1	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.592178841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776898	2540865	2540961	277382	277477	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC36B7.03	usp102	sec63	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193551725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776899	2540865	2539974	277382	276518	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC32H8.07	usp102	git5	mud1|U1A	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.062916246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776900	2540865	2539224	277382	275794	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC16A11.01	usp102	SPCC16A11.01	mud1|U1A	SPCC63.15	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.063877564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776901	2540865	2541720	277382	278214	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC23H3.13c	usp102	gpa2	mud1|U1A	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.042097116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776902	2540865	2543495	277382	279914	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC513.03	usp102	mfm2	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.991413448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776903	2540865	2543378	277382	279800	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC3H8.07c	usp102	pac10	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.448495896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776904	2540865	2538935	277382	275511	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC1682.11c	usp102	ctl1	mud1|U1A	SPCC1682.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189550347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776905	2540865	2539408	277382	275973	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC576.12c	usp102	mhf2	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.196255552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776906	2540865	2542519	277382	278977	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC19G12.08	usp102	scs7	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.685010409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776907	2540865	2539215	277382	275785	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC285.16c	usp102	msh6	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.411032089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776908	2540865	2539953	277382	276497	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC1709.11c	usp102	png2	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.617618083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776909	2540865	2542919	277382	279360	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC6C3.08	usp102	nas6	mud1|U1A	SPAC6C3.08	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.435145773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776910	2540865	2543683	277382	280097	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAPB1E7.04c	usp102	SPAPB1E7.04c	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452552297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776911	2540865	2542056	277382	278535	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC6G9.14	usp102	SPAC6G9.14	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.51235923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776912	2540865	2542439	277382	278901	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC17A5.08	usp102	erp2	mud1|U1A	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.618631263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776913	2540865	2540990	277382	277506	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC36B7.06c	usp102	mug20	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.701518401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776914	2540865	2541389	277382	277900	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBPB2B2.09c	usp102	SPBPB2B2.09c	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.849812325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776915	2540865	2542125	277382	278601	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAP8A3.03	usp102	SPAP8A3.03	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.40744753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776916	2540865	2538708	277382	275292	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC594.01	usp102	SPCC594.01	mud1|U1A	SPCC736.16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380203348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776917	2540865	2541708	277382	278203	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC31A2.02	usp102	trm112	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.330750397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776918	2540865	2543224	277382	279652	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAPB8E5.10	usp102	SPAPB8E5.10	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.046860403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776919	2540865	2541464	277382	277966	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC222.08c	usp102	SPAC222.08c	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.751732395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776920	2540865	2542267	277382	278736	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAPYUK71.03c	usp102	syn1	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.769753728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776921	2540865	2539363	277382	275929	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC613.02	usp102	SPCC613.02	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.333994829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776922	2540865	3361470	277382	280546	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC3G9.01	usp102	nsk1	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517122217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776923	2540865	2541186	277382	277700	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC725.01	usp102	SPBC725.01	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448687884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776924	2540865	2539059	277382	275632	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC737.06c	usp102	SPCC737.06c	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388265612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776925	2540865	2538690	277382	275275	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC1393.05	usp102	ers1	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.971484809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776926	2540865	2539498	277382	276061	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC645.11c	usp102	mug117	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258177004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776927	2540865	2539113	277382	275685	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC1919.11	usp102	mug137	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.93539599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776928	2540865	2540193	277382	276726	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC1289.10c	usp102	adn2	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.99651193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776929	2540865	2541337	277382	277848	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBP35G2.13c	usp102	swc2	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.746255418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776930	2540865	2543254	277382	279682	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC1006.03c	usp102	red1	mud1|U1A	iss3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.379204796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776931	2540865	2538848	277382	275429	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC613.12c	usp102	raf1	mud1|U1A	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.545473044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776932	2540865	2541896	277382	278386	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC23H4.16c	usp102	SPAC23H4.16c	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.618574413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776933	2540865	2540643	277382	277168	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC19G7.06	usp102	mbx1	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.438758832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776934	2540865	2541628	277382	278124	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC110.02	usp102	pds5	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323240437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776935	2540865	2542875	277382	279320	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC13G7.02c	usp102	ssa1	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512184095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776936	2540865	2541713	277382	278208	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC3A12.12	usp102	atp11	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.052652067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776937	2540865	2540001	277382	276545	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC1289.13c	usp102	gmh6	mud1|U1A	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.907757117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776938	2540865	2542170	277382	278645	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC17G8.13c	usp102	mst2	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.71191095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776939	2540865	2543113	277382	279545	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC3F10.07c	usp102	erf4	mud1|U1A	mug91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.547799353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776940	2540865	2542547	277382	279004	SPBC4B4.07c	SPACUNK4.09	usp102	SPACUNK4.09	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.498323403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776941	2540865	2542619	277382	279073	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC6G10.02c	usp102	tea3	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321191524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776942	2540865	2539362	277382	275928	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC18B5.10c	usp102	SPCC18B5.10c	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.822959292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776943	2540865	2539555	277382	276116	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC4B3.08	usp102	lsg1	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.799789135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776944	2540865	2542327	277382	278793	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC16C9.06c	usp102	upf1	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.143511167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776945	2540865	2542167	277382	278642	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC17C9.11c	usp102	SPAC17C9.11c	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.663420208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776946	2540865	2543071	277382	279504	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC3C7.06c	usp102	pit1	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702224358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776947	2540865	2540061	277382	276599	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC119.12	usp102	rud3	mud1|U1A	SPBC119.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513979241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776948	2540865	2543567	277382	279983	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC890.03	usp102	ppk16	mud1|U1A	mug92	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.628933322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776949	2540865	2539108	277382	275680	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC1223.02	usp102	nmt1	mud1|U1A	thi3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.720325178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776950	2540865	2542883	277382	279328	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC1486.04c	usp102	alm1	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.460547497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776951	2540865	2542881	277382	279326	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC13F5.03c	usp102	gld1	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189212111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776952	2540865	2539925	277382	276469	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC16H5.13	usp102	SPBC16H5.13	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325742566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776953	2540865	2539030	277382	275603	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCP1E11.02	usp102	ppk38	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.899569803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776954	2540865	2540800	277382	277319	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC409.20c	usp102	psh3	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.56958546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776955	2540865	2539770	277382	276321	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC1685.11	usp102	rlp1	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.173949593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776956	2540865	2542541	277382	278998	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC1B3.03c	usp102	wis2	mud1|U1A	cyp5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195332461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776957	2540865	2539296	277382	275864	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC1235.03	usp102	cue2	mud1|U1A	SPCC1235.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.586105503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776958	2540865	2538966	277382	275540	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC18.10	usp102	SPCC18.10	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.001937343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776959	2540865	2541617	277382	278114	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC27D7.04	usp102	omt2	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.718691333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776960	2540865	2540600	277382	277126	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC4.05	usp102	mlo2	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871069799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776961	2540865	2541103	277382	277618	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC651.06	usp102	mug166	mud1|U1A	csa1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.971208669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776962	2540865	2541432	277382	277937	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC1F5.05c	usp102	mso1	mud1|U1A	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.63510111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776963	2540865	2543066	277382	279499	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC343.12	usp102	rds1	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703640566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776964	2540865	2539239	277382	275809	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC1020.10	usp102	oca2	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517270756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776965	2540865	2539471	277382	276034	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC576.14	usp102	dph5	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.483604502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776966	2540865	2541531	277382	278031	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC25A8.01c	usp102	fft3	mud1|U1A	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.404803425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776967	2540865	2540346	277382	276875	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC2F12.03c	usp102	ebs1	mud1|U1A	SPBC2F12.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.850693748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776968	2540865	2543219	277382	279647	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC56F8.09	usp102	rrp8	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935738927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776969	2540865	2541678	277382	278174	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAP7G5.05	usp102	rpl1002	mud1|U1A	rpl10|rpl10-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.878802439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776970	2540865	2541114	277382	277629	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC582.09	usp102	pex11	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.666849791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776971	2540865	2540699	277382	277223	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC800.08	usp102	gcd10	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.490179109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776972	2540865	2540829	277382	277347	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC800.09	usp102	sum2	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.62181777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776973	2540865	2539136	277382	275708	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC1919.05	usp102	SPCC1919.05	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149254265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776974	2540865	2540677	277382	277202	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC21B10.03c	usp102	ath1	mud1|U1A	SPBC21B10.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874060389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776975	2540865	2542326	277382	278792	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC16C9.07	usp102	pom2	mud1|U1A	SPAC2G11.01|mug189|ppk5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.560763994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776976	2540865	2541036	277382	277551	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC3H7.05c	usp102	SPBC3H7.05c	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.286766069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776977	2540865	2542403	277382	278867	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC19A8.05c	usp102	sst4	mud1|U1A	vps27	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035571577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776978	2540865	2542918	277382	279359	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC12G12.12	usp102	SPAC12G12.12	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77080856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776979	2540865	2543091	277382	279524	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC12G12.15	usp102	sif3	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095429722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776980	2540865	2539772	277382	276323	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC1734.05c	usp102	spf31	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.629736175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776981	2540865	2543228	277382	279656	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC6B12.04c	usp102	SPAC6B12.04c	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.973032674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776982	2540865	2542727	277382	279177	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC26A3.02	usp102	myh1	mud1|U1A	myh	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.123746007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776983	2540865	2540629	277382	277155	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC21D10.09c	usp102	rkr1	mud1|U1A	SPBC21D10.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.803770549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776984	2540865	2542826	277382	279273	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC13G6.09	usp102	SPAC13G6.09	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.145067274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776985	2540865	2542878	277382	279323	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC57A10.09c	usp102	nhp6	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.197351104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776986	2540865	2543420	277382	279842	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC3H1.04c	usp102	mdm31	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.420202307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776987	2540865	2540297	277382	276828	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC24C6.08c	usp102	bhd1	mud1|U1A	bhd	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040176769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776988	2540865	2540555	277382	277082	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBP16F5.02	usp102	mcs2	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.46011835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776989	2540865	2538787	277382	275368	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC364.02c	usp102	bis1	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.260854017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776990	2540865	2543633	277382	280047	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC3H8.05c	usp102	mms1	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.029372531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776991	2540865	2541757	277382	278251	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC2F7.10	usp102	akr1	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769314286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776992	2540865	3361511	277382	280587	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC23C4.08	usp102	rho3	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.806101588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776993	2540865	2542442	277382	278904	SPBC4B4.07c	SPACUNK12.02c	usp102	cmk1	mud1|U1A	CaMK-I|SPAC25D11.02C	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.99393653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776994	2540865	2539920	277382	276464	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC119.08	usp102	pmk1	mud1|U1A	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441907387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776995	2540865	2542116	277382	278592	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC1B3.15c	usp102	SPAC1B3.15c	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.712101991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776996	2540865	2539410	277382	275975	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC4G3.17	usp102	SPCC4G3.17	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639371251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776997	2540865	2543525	277382	279943	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC4A8.14	usp102	SPAC4A8.14	mud1|U1A	prs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703929698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776998	2540865	2539375	277382	275941	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC4G3.11	usp102	mug154	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.651426484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
776999	2540865	2543380	277382	279802	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC4G9.16c	usp102	rpl901	mud1|U1A	rpl9-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19478886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777000	2540865	2540146	277382	276683	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC17A3.06	usp102	SPBC17A3.06	mud1|U1A	pi040	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.80803286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777001	2540865	2542021	277382	278504	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAP14E8.02	usp102	tos4	mud1|U1A	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.945825638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777002	2540865	2541645	277382	278141	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC1527.03	usp102	SPAC1527.03	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.229825123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777003	2540865	2538861	277382	275441	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC1620.11	usp102	nup97	mud1|U1A	mug87	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933614169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777004	2540865	2543513	277382	279931	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC821.06	usp102	spn2	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.562464138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777005	2540865	2543400	277382	279822	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC3G9.11c	usp102	SPAC3G9.11c	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.121120182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777006	2540865	2541709	277382	278204	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC3C7.02c	usp102	pil2	mud1|U1A	SPAC3C7.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.516879928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777007	2540865	2541806	277382	278297	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC4G8.13c	usp102	prz1	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.622018157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777008	2540865	2541774	277382	278268	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC22E12.05c	usp102	rer1	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.77055035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777009	2540865	2543684	277382	280098	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC4G8.03c	usp102	SPAC4G8.03c	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.269111809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777010	2540865	2543446	277382	279866	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC4F8.10c	usp102	stg1	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046753427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777011	2540865	2539259	277382	275829	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC553.05c	usp102	wtf6	mud1|U1A	SPCC553.05c|SPCC553.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874288956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777012	2540865	2538981	277382	275555	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC330.06c	usp102	pmp20	mud1|U1A	SPCC330.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811158744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777013	2540865	2543087	277382	279520	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC30C2.04	usp102	SPAC30C2.04	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.187233873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777014	2540865	2543070	277382	279503	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC2H10.02c	usp102	SPAC2H10.02c	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199084492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777015	2540865	2540561	277382	277088	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC28F2.05c	usp102	SPBC28F2.05c	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876269186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777016	2540865	2539583	277382	276142	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC777.04	usp102	SPCC777.04	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.842834951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777017	2540865	2543151	277382	279583	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC343.06c	usp102	SPAC343.06c	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.22733915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777018	2540865	2543372	277382	279794	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAPB1A10.09	usp102	ase1	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.508503512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777019	2540865	2539976	277382	276520	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC1683.07	usp102	mal1	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808341223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777020	2540865	2543644	277382	280058	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAPB1A10.03	usp102	nxt1	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.974792392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777021	2540865	2542941	277382	279382	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC3C7.07c	usp102	SPAC3C7.07c	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.267553133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777022	2540865	2538834	277382	275415	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC126.08c	usp102	SPCC126.08c	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.691835369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777023	2540865	2542111	277382	278587	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC1687.14c	usp102	SPAC1687.14c	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.28655535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777024	2540865	2542890	277382	279334	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC13G6.14	usp102	aps1	mud1|U1A	SPAC24B11.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153306459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777025	2540865	2540383	277382	276912	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC31E1.02c	usp102	pmr1	mud1|U1A	cps5|pgak2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388728618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777026	2540865	2542656	277382	279110	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC2E1P3.05c	usp102	SPAC2E1P3.05c	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767880103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777027	2540865	2542087	277382	278564	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC26F1.02	usp102	pnn1	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934598511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777028	2540865	2542594	277382	279048	SPBC4B4.07c	SPACUNK4.10	usp102	SPACUNK4.10	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380355619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777029	2540865	2542094	277382	278571	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC29B12.06c	usp102	rcd1	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.232855881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777030	2540865	2543646	277382	280060	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC821.07c	usp102	moc3	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.277782751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777031	2540865	2541945	277382	278432	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC23C4.06c	usp102	SPAC23C4.06c	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.456487299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777032	2540865	2542617	277382	279071	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC13A11.01c	usp102	rga8	mud1|U1A	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453878797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777033	2540865	2541062	277382	277577	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC660.11	usp102	tcg1	mud1|U1A	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05156906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777034	2540865	2541228	277382	277742	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBP16F5.08c	usp102	SPBP16F5.08c	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808093625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777035	2540865	2543463	277382	279883	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAPB21F2.03	usp102	slx9	mud1|U1A	SPAPB21F2.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.487654464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777036	2540865	2541875	277382	278365	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC22F3.06c	usp102	lon1	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990244824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777037	2540865	2543616	277382	280030	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC4A8.09c	usp102	cwf21	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984109671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777038	2540865	2540734	277382	277257	SPBC4B4.07c	SPBC19G7.09	usp102	ulp1	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440760464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777039	2540865	2542908	277382	279352	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC13G7.03	usp102	upf3	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.013385396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777040	2540865	2541893	277382	278383	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC23H4.13c	usp102	SPAC23H4.13c	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.765574294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777041	2540865	2543024	277382	279460	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC1039.02	usp102	SPAC1039.02	mud1|U1A	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.060752978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777042	2540865	2542571	277382	279027	SPBC4B4.07c	SPAC589.02c	usp102	med13	mud1|U1A	spTrap240|srb9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.764820844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777043	2540865	2538730	277382	275314	SPBC4B4.07c	SPCC31H12.02c	usp102	mug73	mud1|U1A	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.767010268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777044	2541195	2541614	277709	278111	SPBC839.17c	SPAC29A4.20	fkh1	elp3	SPBC24E9.17c	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.54609928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777045	2541195	2541531	277709	278031	SPBC839.17c	SPAC25A8.01c	fkh1	fft3	SPBC24E9.17c	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.871685274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777046	2540686	2542207	277211	278682	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC17H9.10c	bdc1	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.543235846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777047	2540686	2538721	277211	275305	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC1494.10	bdc1	adn3	-	SPCC70.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577411744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777048	2540686	2543317	277211	279741	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC823.14	bdc1	ptf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.346513251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777049	2540686	2538961	277211	275535	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC285.14	bdc1	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.119133358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777050	2540686	2542577	277211	279033	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC19G12.15c	bdc1	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.97213986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777051	2540686	2542585	277211	279040	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC31A2.13c	bdc1	sft1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.243389553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777052	2540686	2542372	277211	278836	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC1F3.03	bdc1	SPAC1F3.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.395535819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777053	2540686	2542066	277211	278543	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC227.05	bdc1	SPAC227.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.730769273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777054	2540686	2541818	277211	278309	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC11G7.02	bdc1	pub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.194505099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777055	2540686	2543064	277211	279497	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC3G6.01	bdc1	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.599809837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777056	2540686	2540653	277211	277178	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC215.07c	bdc1	SPBC215.07c	-	pdp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.454036518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777057	2540686	2542293	277211	278761	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC17G8.14c	bdc1	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.481572752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777058	2540686	2542378	277211	278842	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC1805.04	bdc1	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.404130196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777059	2540686	2540528	277211	277056	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC18H10.04c	bdc1	sce3	-	tif48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.064905375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777060	2540686	2539930	277211	276474	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC1198.11c	bdc1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.131547695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777061	2540686	2541117	277211	277632	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC646.13	bdc1	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.549638007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777062	2540686	2540161	277211	276696	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC13E7.03c	bdc1	SPBC13E7.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.402817124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777063	2540686	2542747	277211	279197	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC15A10.06	bdc1	SPAC15A10.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701983904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777064	2540686	2538922	277211	275499	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC16C4.10	bdc1	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.857427729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777065	2540686	2542103	277211	278579	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC31G5.11	bdc1	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.449387897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777066	2540686	2540664	277211	277189	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC215.02	bdc1	bob1	-	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390497493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777067	2540686	2541286	277211	277799	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC9B6.11c	bdc1	SPBC9B6.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331934519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777068	2540686	2541361	277211	277872	SPBC21D10.10	SPBP8B7.10c	bdc1	utp16	-	SPBP8B7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.401659958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777069	2540686	2539226	277211	275796	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC16C4.20c	bdc1	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.652474402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777070	2540686	2540975	277211	277491	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC354.12	bdc1	gpd3	-	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.400123642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777071	2540686	2541200	277211	277714	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC8D2.03c	bdc1	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.754899723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777072	2540686	2542677	277211	279130	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC26F1.10c	bdc1	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.242059497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777073	2540686	2541013	277211	277528	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC3H7.13	bdc1	far10	-	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.549768606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777074	2540686	2540979	277211	277495	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC3H7.10	bdc1	elp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.672294618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777075	2540686	2541026	277211	277541	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC337.09	bdc1	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.483478457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777076	2540686	2540220	277211	276753	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC337.03	bdc1	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.391318375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777077	2540686	2539797	277211	276347	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC16G5.14c	bdc1	rps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.997240483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777078	2540686	2541119	277211	277634	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC651.11c	bdc1	apm3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.312131159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777079	2540686	2541346	277211	277857	SPBC21D10.10	SPBP8B7.08c	bdc1	ppm1	-	SPBP8B7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.44419313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777080	2540686	2540993	277211	277509	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC342.01c	bdc1	alg6	-	SPBC3F6.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994558467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777081	2540686	2542022	277211	278505	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC23A1.03	bdc1	apt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.435388963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777082	2540686	2540425	277211	276953	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC27.06c	bdc1	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.373055459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777083	2540686	2542969	277211	279409	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC4G8.10	bdc1	gos1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.456227749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777084	2540686	2540467	277211	276995	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC2G2.07c	bdc1	mug178	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.136599774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777085	2540686	2543108	277211	279540	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC3A12.13c	bdc1	SPAC3A12.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377681875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777086	2540686	2543563	277211	279979	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC664.02c	bdc1	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.2696191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777087	2540686	2543584	277211	279999	SPBC21D10.10	SPAPB1E7.11c	bdc1	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.676608905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777088	2540686	2539100	277211	275672	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC330.12c	bdc1	sdh3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.882752546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777089	2540686	2538906	277211	275483	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC1259.03	bdc1	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.628909285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777090	2540686	2542981	277211	279419	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC824.02	bdc1	bst1	-	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.813606933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777091	2540686	2541926	277211	278414	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC222.14c	bdc1	SPAC222.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.103293083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777092	2540686	2541021	277211	277536	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC3B8.10c	bdc1	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.986528966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777093	2540686	2539310	277211	275877	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC285.17	bdc1	spp27	-	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.349037563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777094	2540686	2542568	277211	279024	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC1952.02	bdc1	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515102121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777095	2540686	2539023	277211	275596	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC594.05c	bdc1	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.955621961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777096	2540686	2542177	277211	278652	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC17H9.08	bdc1	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.320003963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777097	2540686	2542596	277211	279050	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC1B3.17	bdc1	clr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.807552797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777098	2540686	2541250	277211	277764	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC8D2.17	bdc1	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64203758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777099	2540686	2541776	277211	278270	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC23H3.05c	bdc1	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.58048072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777100	2540686	2540647	277211	277172	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC18H10.07	bdc1	SPBC18H10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.722405955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777101	2540686	3361491	277211	280567	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC1805.08	bdc1	dlc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.593654176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777102	2540686	2543412	277211	279834	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC637.07	bdc1	moe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.062788036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777103	2540686	2539733	277211	276285	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC16E9.12c	bdc1	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.650493398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777104	2540686	2540396	277211	276924	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC31F10.12	bdc1	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.466095821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777105	2540686	2540673	277211	277198	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC1D7.03	bdc1	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325216264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777106	2540686	2541889	277211	278379	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC2F7.03c	bdc1	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.542944984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777107	2540686	2542817	277211	279264	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC13G6.02c	bdc1	rps101	-	rps1-1|rps3a-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640846895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777108	2540686	2542227	277211	278700	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC5H10.13c	bdc1	gmh2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.545319595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777109	2540686	2539484	277211	276047	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC594.04c	bdc1	SPCC594.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.041113092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777110	2540686	2542873	277211	279318	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC9G1.02	bdc1	wis4	-	wak1|wik1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323201944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777111	2540686	2539999	277211	276543	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC1734.15	bdc1	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.105187567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777112	2540686	2541496	277211	277998	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC23D3.09	bdc1	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.734133664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777113	2540686	2539603	277211	276161	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC1289.06c	bdc1	ppr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.250058868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777114	2540686	2539857	277211	276404	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC1604.20c	bdc1	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.128938447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777115	2540686	2543643	277211	280057	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC3G9.07c	bdc1	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.294512582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777116	2540686	2541899	277211	278389	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC22E12.11c	bdc1	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.572876521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777117	2540686	2539667	277211	276222	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC13G1.08c	bdc1	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.97942584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777118	2540686	2542032	277211	278514	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC23C11.04c	bdc1	pnk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.259325892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777119	2540686	2542946	277211	279386	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC6F12.03c	bdc1	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.087999554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777120	2540686	2542976	277211	279414	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC9E9.09c	bdc1	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331136823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777121	2540686	2543236	277211	279664	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC8C9.04	bdc1	SPAC8C9.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.056831766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777122	2540686	2543495	277211	279914	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC513.03	bdc1	mfm2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378329771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777123	2540686	2541903	277211	278393	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC22F8.05	bdc1	SPAC22F8.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2652468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777124	2540686	2540077	277211	276615	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC17D11.04c	bdc1	nto1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.518201145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777125	2540686	2543378	277211	279800	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC3H8.07c	bdc1	pac10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.101646174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777126	2540686	2542254	277211	278724	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC30D11.04c	bdc1	nup124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.183101466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777127	2540686	2542549	277211	279006	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC19A8.11c	bdc1	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.203289564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777128	2540686	2541009	277211	277524	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC428.04	bdc1	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.308005538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777129	2540686	2542439	277211	278901	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC17A5.08	bdc1	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.188455985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777130	2540686	2543443	277211	279863	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC3H1.12c	bdc1	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.30279809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777131	2540686	2540019	277211	276563	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC1685.01	bdc1	pmp1	-	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.094336035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777132	2540686	2541536	277211	278036	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC1071.02	bdc1	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.002966702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777133	2540686	2540342	277211	276871	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC2G2.01c	bdc1	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.689146661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777134	2540686	2541053	277211	277568	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC56F2.10c	bdc1	alg5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317275686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777135	2540686	2540180	277211	276713	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC16D10.11c	bdc1	rps1801	-	rps18-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.322273045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777136	2540686	2542773	277211	279222	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC16.01	bdc1	rho2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.050554803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777137	2540686	2539172	277211	275743	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC1020.08	bdc1	SPCC1020.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.918611989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777138	2540686	2541266	277211	277780	SPBC21D10.10	SPBP16F5.05c	bdc1	yar1	-	SPBP16F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.371422705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777139	2540686	2540229	277211	276761	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC31F10.15c	bdc1	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389544128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777140	2540686	2541927	277211	278415	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC222.12c	bdc1	atp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.148965871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777141	2540686	2538884	277211	275462	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC1393.08	bdc1	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380904238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777142	2540686	2539421	277211	275986	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC794.11c	bdc1	ent3	-	SPCC794.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.307289268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777143	2540686	2541488	277211	277990	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC227.17c	bdc1	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.866767601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777144	2540686	2540193	277211	276726	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC1289.10c	bdc1	adn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.91090464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777145	2540686	2539527	277211	276089	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC338.16	bdc1	pof3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.625395849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777146	2540686	2540930	277211	277446	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC354.10	bdc1	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.821803632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777147	2540686	2539519	277211	276081	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC364.05	bdc1	vps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.991684988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777148	2540686	2540691	277211	277216	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC20F10.05	bdc1	nrl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.399132246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777149	2540686	2540946	277211	277462	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC36.04	bdc1	cys11	-	cys1a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.454436127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777150	2540686	2542869	277211	279314	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC140.02	bdc1	gar2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.13973548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777151	2540686	2540821	277211	277339	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC800.03	bdc1	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.116905108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777152	2540686	2539706	277211	276259	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC16G5.13	bdc1	ptf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.503468695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777153	2540686	2541786	277211	278278	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC22F3.08c	bdc1	rok1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.191684569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777154	2540686	2539354	277211	275920	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC4F11.03c	bdc1	SPCC4F11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.900085077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777155	2540686	2542759	277211	279209	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC9G1.07	bdc1	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.244672716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777156	2540686	2538762	277211	275345	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC306.04c	bdc1	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.18617331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777157	2540686	2541175	277211	277689	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC839.13c	bdc1	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776676652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777158	2540686	2543106	277211	279538	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC3A11.13	bdc1	SPAC3A11.13	-	SPAC3H5.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.678227086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777159	2540686	2543670	277211	280084	SPBC21D10.10	SPAPB1E7.06c	bdc1	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.619651092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777160	2540686	2542883	277211	279328	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC1486.04c	bdc1	alm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.046160812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777161	2540686	2543304	277211	279728	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC6B12.12	bdc1	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.359852006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777162	2540686	2541531	277211	278031	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC25A8.01c	bdc1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.53903966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777163	2540686	2540654	277211	277179	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC19F5.01c	bdc1	puc1	-	SPBP8B7.32c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.398528219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777164	2540686	2539013	277211	275586	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC364.03	bdc1	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.522314594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777165	2540686	2540699	277211	277223	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC800.08	bdc1	gcd10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.846885808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777166	2540686	2540829	277211	277347	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC800.09	bdc1	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.14838944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777167	2540686	2542418	277211	278881	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC1805.07c	bdc1	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.626448156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777168	2540686	2538916	277211	275493	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC16C4.17	bdc1	mug123	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.130442075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777169	2540686	2542222	277211	278695	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC31G5.18c	bdc1	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.757101399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777170	2540686	2542826	277211	279273	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC13G6.09	bdc1	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.155219698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777171	2540686	2541744	277211	278238	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC23A1.02c	bdc1	SPAC23A1.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.095966707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777172	2540686	2543044	277211	279479	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC3C7.12	bdc1	tip1	-	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.741987448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777173	2540686	2539205	277211	275775	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC4B3.15	bdc1	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.277748672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777174	2540686	2539375	277211	275941	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC4G3.11	bdc1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.496295608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777175	2540686	2538840	277211	275421	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC736.07c	bdc1	SPCC736.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.131286017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777176	2540686	2543384	277211	279806	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC637.06	bdc1	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.975982134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777177	2540686	2543387	277211	279809	SPBC21D10.10	SPAPB1E7.02c	bdc1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.92567072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777178	2540686	2542175	277211	278650	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC1F3.02c	bdc1	mkh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.296605925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777179	2540686	2540558	277211	277085	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC2D10.17	bdc1	clr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638605851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777180	2540686	2542424	277211	278886	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC1805.14	bdc1	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.692379057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777181	2540686	2539588	277211	276146	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC962.04	bdc1	rps1201	-	rps12|rps12-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.670422584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777182	2540686	2543372	277211	279794	SPBC21D10.10	SPAPB1A10.09	bdc1	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.661507664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777183	2540686	2538947	277211	275521	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC1682.12c	bdc1	ubp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.39982353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777184	2540686	2538834	277211	275415	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC126.08c	bdc1	SPCC126.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640538151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777185	2540686	2540309	277211	276839	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC21B10.13c	bdc1	yox1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.386684189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777186	2540686	2543472	277211	279892	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC959.04c	bdc1	omh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.746675505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777187	2540686	2542094	277211	278571	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC29B12.06c	bdc1	rcd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039028264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777188	2540686	2541297	277211	277809	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC9B6.07	bdc1	nop52	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.542606439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777189	2540686	2542617	277211	279071	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC13A11.01c	bdc1	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.096674079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777190	2540686	2540320	277211	276850	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC3D6.04c	bdc1	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.685751309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777191	2540686	2539001	277211	275575	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC1494.08c	bdc1	SPCC1494.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09266663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777192	2540686	2540649	277211	277174	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC19F8.08	bdc1	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.141079365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777193	2540829	2539050	277347	275623	SPBC800.09	SPCC11E10.08	sum2	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504146972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777194	2540829	2542598	277347	279052	SPBC800.09	SPAC6G10.08	sum2	idp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.973141769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777195	2540829	2543306	277347	279730	SPBC800.09	SPAC56F8.14c	sum2	mug115	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807500166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777196	2540829	2543152	277347	279584	SPBC800.09	SPAC869.03c	sum2	SPAC869.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.068781414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777197	2540829	2540528	277347	277056	SPBC800.09	SPBC18H10.04c	sum2	sce3	-	tif48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.438433785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777198	2540829	2542650	277347	279104	SPBC800.09	SPAC2C4.10c	sum2	csc4	-	SPAC2C4.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320858707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777199	2540829	2540694	277347	277218	SPBC800.09	SPBC19C7.10	sum2	bqt4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384605075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777200	2540829	2542492	277347	278951	SPBC800.09	SPAC1B9.02c	sum2	sck1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.982244435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777201	2540829	2540686	277347	277211	SPBC800.09	SPBC21D10.10	sum2	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.14838944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777202	2540829	2539890	277347	276436	SPBC800.09	SPBC16C6.03c	sum2	SPBC16C6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.686624051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777203	2540829	2542103	277347	278579	SPBC800.09	SPAC31G5.11	sum2	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.501119382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777204	2540829	2540535	277347	277062	SPBC800.09	SPBC215.01	sum2	SPBC215.01	-	SPBC3B9.20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568918192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777205	2540829	2538806	277347	275387	SPBC800.09	SPCC1840.09	sum2	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.632021118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777206	2540829	2539420	277347	275985	SPBC800.09	SPCC970.07c	sum2	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.207280536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777207	2540829	2541208	277347	277722	SPBC800.09	SPBC887.04c	sum2	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.59575473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777208	2540829	2542050	277347	278529	SPBC800.09	SPAC212.02	sum2	SPAC212.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.214734684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777209	2540829	2542816	277347	279263	SPBC800.09	SPAC4G8.11c	sum2	atp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.475936968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777210	2540829	2539564	277347	276125	SPBC800.09	SPCC550.12	sum2	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.401494181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777211	2540829	2542724	277347	279175	SPBC800.09	SPAC767.01c	sum2	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712340062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777212	2540829	2539249	277347	275819	SPBC800.09	SPCC1450.05c	sum2	rox3	-	med19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.84367518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777213	2540829	2540220	277347	276753	SPBC800.09	SPBC337.03	sum2	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.900865726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777214	2540829	2539937	277347	276481	SPBC800.09	SPBC1539.08	sum2	arf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783566563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777215	2540829	2540727	277347	277250	SPBC800.09	SPBC1921.03c	sum2	mex67	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63862091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777216	2540829	2542022	277347	278505	SPBC800.09	SPAC23A1.03	sum2	apt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506401202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777217	2540829	2541424	277347	277929	SPBC800.09	SPAC23G3.04	sum2	ies4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935587671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777218	2540829	2542318	277347	278784	SPBC800.09	SPAC16C9.05	sum2	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.721107628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777219	2540829	2543685	277347	280099	SPBC800.09	SPAC3C7.03c	sum2	rad55	-	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441401481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777220	2540829	2541707	277347	278202	SPBC800.09	SPAC29E6.01	sum2	pof11	-	SPAC30.05|mug156	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980638119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777221	2540829	2540851	277347	277368	SPBC800.09	SPBC4F6.04	sum2	rpl2502	-	rpl23a-2|rpl25b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.912538085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777222	2540829	2539820	277347	276370	SPBC800.09	SPBC1709.13c	sum2	set10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.94353168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777223	2540829	2543584	277347	279999	SPBC800.09	SPAPB1E7.11c	sum2	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.828709952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777224	2540829	2541663	277347	278159	SPBC800.09	SPAC22G7.08	sum2	ppk8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.434609733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777225	2540829	2541489	277347	277991	SPBC800.09	SPAC23D3.11	sum2	ayr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979250562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777226	2540829	2538906	277347	275483	SPBC800.09	SPCC1259.03	sum2	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.396050327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777227	2540829	3361543	277347	280619	SPBC800.09	SPAC9.13c	sum2	cwf16	-	SPAPJ735.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643717549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777228	2540829	2541926	277347	278414	SPBC800.09	SPAC222.14c	sum2	SPAC222.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.1590038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777229	2540829	2541021	277347	277536	SPBC800.09	SPBC3B8.10c	sum2	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.43739682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777230	2540829	2540964	277347	277480	SPBC800.09	SPBC365.16	sum2	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.361735153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777231	2540829	2542239	277347	278711	SPBC800.09	SPAC18G6.02c	sum2	chp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770908698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777232	2540829	2542036	277347	278518	SPBC800.09	SPAC23A1.19c	sum2	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.896778804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777233	2540829	2539628	277347	276185	SPBC800.09	SPBC1604.03c	sum2	SPBC1604.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.904748344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777234	2540829	2541160	277347	277675	SPBC800.09	SPBC725.09c	sum2	hob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.931476734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777235	2540829	2543412	277347	279834	SPBC800.09	SPAC637.07	sum2	moe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.762062432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777236	2540829	2540673	277347	277198	SPBC800.09	SPBC1D7.03	sum2	mug80	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.582590604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777237	2540829	2542168	277347	278643	SPBC800.09	SPAC17A5.16	sum2	ftp105	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.125296591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777238	2540829	2542817	277347	279264	SPBC800.09	SPAC13G6.02c	sum2	rps101	-	rps1-1|rps3a-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.117202311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777239	2540829	2539371	277347	275937	SPBC800.09	SPCC18B5.06	sum2	dom34	-	SPCC18B5.06|erf1|sup45	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.933860563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777240	2540829	2539484	277347	276047	SPBC800.09	SPCC594.04c	sum2	SPCC594.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.419316108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777241	2540829	2542428	277347	278890	SPBC800.09	SPAC1805.12c	sum2	uep1	-	ubi2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392686316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777242	2540829	2539999	277347	276543	SPBC800.09	SPBC1734.15	sum2	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.309511524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777243	2540829	2541496	277347	277998	SPBC800.09	SPAC23D3.09	sum2	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.760549305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777244	2540829	2541096	277347	277611	SPBC800.09	SPBC725.10	sum2	SPBC725.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.408235695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777245	2540829	2539857	277347	276404	SPBC800.09	SPBC1604.20c	sum2	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979480467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777246	2540829	2543396	277347	279818	SPBC800.09	SPAC4D7.11	sum2	dsc4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.849410279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777247	2540829	2543406	277347	279828	SPBC800.09	SPAC9.12c	sum2	atp12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.997212271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777248	2540829	2541187	277347	277701	SPBC800.09	SPBC776.14	sum2	plh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927930836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777249	2540829	2542032	277347	278514	SPBC800.09	SPAC23C11.04c	sum2	pnk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.215044086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777250	2540829	2542007	277347	278490	SPBC800.09	SPAC20H4.07	sum2	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.28444173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777251	2540829	2540997	277347	277513	SPBC800.09	SPBC3H7.06c	sum2	pof9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.209792709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777252	2540829	2540430	277347	276958	SPBC800.09	SPBC25B2.01	sum2	SPBC25B2.01	-	SPBC2G5.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.430926602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777253	2540829	2543244	277347	279672	SPBC800.09	SPAC6B12.06c	sum2	rrg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516505004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777254	2540829	2542976	277347	279414	SPBC800.09	SPAC9E9.09c	sum2	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.281986969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777255	2540829	2542070	277347	278547	SPBC800.09	SPAC29B12.02c	sum2	set2	-	kmt3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09387023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777256	2540829	2538841	277347	275422	SPBC800.09	SPCC550.03c	sum2	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.219941142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777257	2540829	2542431	277347	278893	SPBC800.09	SPAC1A6.01c	sum2	SPAC1A6.01c	-	SPAC23C4.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382254151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777258	2540829	2541900	277347	278390	SPBC800.09	SPAC23H4.17c	sum2	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.122057537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777259	2540829	2542612	277347	279066	SPBC800.09	SPACUNK4.15	sum2	SPACUNK4.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44735418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777260	2540829	2542549	277347	279006	SPBC800.09	SPAC19A8.11c	sum2	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994006932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777261	2540829	2541389	277347	277900	SPBC800.09	SPBPB2B2.09c	sum2	SPBPB2B2.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509447441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777262	2540829	2540201	277347	276734	SPBC800.09	SPBC13A2.04c	sum2	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.768955711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777263	2540829	2540342	277347	276871	SPBC800.09	SPBC2G2.01c	sum2	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.507527594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777264	2540829	2539043	277347	275616	SPBC800.09	SPCC1235.08c	sum2	pdh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876704683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777265	2540829	2540967	277347	277483	SPBC800.09	SPBC36B7.08c	sum2	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632195677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777266	2540829	2541410	277347	277918	SPBC800.09	SPBPB2B2.17c	sum2	SPBPB2B2.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.497600528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777267	2540829	2541186	277347	277700	SPBC800.09	SPBC725.01	sum2	SPBC725.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.047608596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777268	2540829	2540533	277347	277061	SPBC800.09	SPBC29A10.16c	sum2	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.822779022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777269	2540829	3361526	277347	280602	SPBC800.09	SPAC664.15	sum2	caf4	-	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.890024139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777270	2540829	3361520	277347	280596	SPBC800.09	SPAC1610.02c	sum2	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.907700076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777271	2540829	2542869	277347	279314	SPBC800.09	SPAC140.02	sum2	gar2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.375190361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777272	2540829	2542875	277347	279320	SPBC800.09	SPAC13G7.02c	sum2	ssa1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197158285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777273	2540829	2541525	277347	278025	SPBC800.09	SPAC27D7.02c	sum2	SPAC27D7.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.840799962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777274	2540829	2542806	277347	279254	SPBC800.09	SPAC1610.01	sum2	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992521183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777275	2540829	2541786	277347	278278	SPBC800.09	SPAC22F3.08c	sum2	rok1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.939276751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777276	2540829	2543628	277347	280042	SPBC800.09	SPAC3H8.10	sum2	spo20	-	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.190621408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777277	2540829	2539101	277347	275673	SPBC800.09	SPCC736.04c	sum2	gma12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.56251396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777278	2540829	2543619	277347	280033	SPBC800.09	SPAC4F10.04	sum2	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449464657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777279	2540829	2543670	277347	280084	SPBC800.09	SPAPB1E7.06c	sum2	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.00010775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777280	2540829	2543567	277347	279983	SPBC800.09	SPAC890.03	sum2	ppk16	-	mug92	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442022519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777281	2540829	2541909	277347	278399	SPBC800.09	SPAC227.01c	sum2	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.914714012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777282	2540829	2539925	277347	276469	SPBC800.09	SPBC16H5.13	sum2	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.897224065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777283	2540829	2540152	277347	276688	SPBC800.09	SPBC12C2.03c	sum2	SPBC12C2.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.190644854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777284	2540829	2542940	277347	279381	SPBC800.09	SPAC31A2.12	sum2	SPAC31A2.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.500286863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777285	2540829	2543096	277347	279528	SPBC800.09	SPAC977.05c	sum2	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.986098191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777286	2540829	2539614	277347	276172	SPBC800.09	SPBC17D11.08	sum2	SPBC17D11.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.265189153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777287	2540829	2541432	277347	277937	SPBC800.09	SPAC1F5.05c	sum2	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.068390079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777288	2540829	2539029	277347	275602	SPBC800.09	SPCC61.05	sum2	SPCC61.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441314613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777289	2540829	2539136	277347	275708	SPBC800.09	SPCC1919.05	sum2	SPCC1919.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.813468632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777290	2540829	2540992	277347	277508	SPBC800.09	SPBC342.05	sum2	crb2	-	rhp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.936558028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777291	2540829	2539207	277347	275777	SPBC800.09	SPCC285.09c	sum2	cgs2	-	pde1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.484477176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777292	2540829	2543044	277347	279479	SPBC800.09	SPAC3C7.12	sum2	tip1	-	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.609609545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777293	2540829	2539205	277347	275775	SPBC800.09	SPCC4B3.15	sum2	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773182162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777294	2540829	3361511	277347	280587	SPBC800.09	SPAC23C4.08	sum2	rho3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.416049339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777295	2540829	2539375	277347	275941	SPBC800.09	SPCC4G3.11	sum2	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.072675705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777296	2540829	2543380	277347	279802	SPBC800.09	SPAC4G9.16c	sum2	rpl901	-	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707647157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777297	2540829	2539178	277347	275749	SPBC800.09	SPCC1682.14	sum2	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.678840452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777298	2540829	2543384	277347	279806	SPBC800.09	SPAC637.06	sum2	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.336706465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777299	2540829	2541806	277347	278297	SPBC800.09	SPAC4G8.13c	sum2	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.094771542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777300	2540829	2541774	277347	278268	SPBC800.09	SPAC22E12.05c	sum2	rer1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.000004125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777301	2540829	2540122	277347	276659	SPBC800.09	SPBC1778.03c	sum2	SPBC1778.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932808708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777302	2540829	2539531	277347	276093	SPBC800.09	SPCC576.02	sum2	SPCC576.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3135514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777303	2540829	2543087	277347	279520	SPBC800.09	SPAC30C2.04	sum2	SPAC30C2.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.314095356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777304	2540829	2541375	277347	277886	SPBC800.09	SPBP8B7.31	sum2	SPBP8B7.31	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.299164878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777305	2540829	2542424	277347	278886	SPBC800.09	SPAC1805.14	sum2	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.83153036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777306	2540829	2543448	277347	279868	SPBC800.09	SPAC3H5.07	sum2	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.556745168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777307	2540829	2542460	277347	278921	SPBC800.09	SPAC1F12.03c	sum2	SPAC1F12.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.745763486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777308	2540829	2542314	277347	278780	SPBC800.09	SPAC16E8.06c	sum2	nop12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.264566714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777309	2540829	2543472	277347	279892	SPBC800.09	SPAC959.04c	sum2	omh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.47918488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777310	2540829	2541297	277347	277809	SPBC800.09	SPBC9B6.07	sum2	nop52	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.113399509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777311	2540829	2543463	277347	279883	SPBC800.09	SPAPB21F2.03	sum2	slx9	-	SPAPB21F2.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.663790618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777312	2540829	2541875	277347	278365	SPBC800.09	SPAC22F3.06c	sum2	lon1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.06119284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777313	2540829	2543616	277347	280030	SPBC800.09	SPAC4A8.09c	sum2	cwf21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.313536319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777314	2540829	2539033	277347	275606	SPBC800.09	SPCC1450.07c	sum2	dao1	-	SPCC1450.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.193230908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777315	2540829	2539001	277347	275575	SPBC800.09	SPCC1494.08c	sum2	SPCC1494.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700651864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777316	2539242	2538939	275812	275514	SPCC290.04	SPCC1672.04c	ams2	SPCC1672.04c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.315628582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777317	2539242	2539774	275812	276325	SPCC290.04	SPBC17A3.10	ams2	pas4	SPCC4F11.01	pi036	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.56144222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777318	2539242	2542862	275812	279308	SPCC290.04	SPAC140.03	ams2	arb1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.404147671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777319	2539242	2539841	275812	276389	SPCC290.04	SPBC17D1.05	ams2	SPBC17D1.05	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.546279013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777320	2539242	2540060	275812	276598	SPCC290.04	SPBC106.01	ams2	mph1	SPCC4F11.01	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.15196711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777321	2539242	2542577	275812	279033	SPCC290.04	SPAC19G12.15c	ams2	tpp1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.363482084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777322	2539242	2540105	275812	276642	SPCC290.04	SPBC106.04	ams2	ada1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.022127971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777323	2539242	2541512	275812	278013	SPCC290.04	SPAC11E3.08c	ams2	nse6	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.645756503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777324	2539242	2539566	275812	276126	SPCC290.04	SPCC736.13	ams2	SPCC736.13	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926519582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777325	2539242	2541570	275812	278067	SPCC290.04	SPAC6G9.09c	ams2	rpl2401	SPCC4F11.01	rpl24|rpl24-01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.413578364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777326	2539242	2542812	275812	279259	SPCC290.04	SPAC6F6.01	ams2	cch1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.878141094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777327	2539242	2539940	275812	276484	SPCC290.04	SPBC16A3.10	ams2	SPBC16A3.10	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462265116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777328	2539242	2540901	275812	277417	SPCC290.04	SPBC4F6.16c	ams2	ero11	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.671008154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777329	2539242	2539582	275812	276141	SPCC290.04	SPCC594.07c	ams2	bqt3	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.770851242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777330	2539242	2542787	275812	279236	SPCC290.04	SPAC9G1.08c	ams2	SPAC9G1.08c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.45669956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777331	2539242	2541552	275812	278051	SPCC290.04	SPAC1142.08	ams2	fhl1	SPCC4F11.01	SPAC8C9.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931673848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777332	2539242	2542358	275812	278823	SPCC290.04	SPAC1782.09c	ams2	clp1	SPCC4F11.01	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.222603526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777333	2539242	2541650	275812	278146	SPCC290.04	SPAC14C4.12c	ams2	laf1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.177720438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777334	2539242	2542293	275812	278761	SPCC290.04	SPAC17G8.14c	ams2	pck1	SPCC4F11.01	SPAC22H10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.774882959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777335	2539242	2542378	275812	278842	SPCC290.04	SPAC1805.04	ams2	nup132	SPCC4F11.01	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.972172997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777336	2539242	2543592	275812	280007	SPCC290.04	SPAC4F10.18	ams2	nup37	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096902789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777337	2539242	2541167	275812	277682	SPCC290.04	SPBC691.05c	ams2	SPBC691.05c	SPCC4F11.01	pi030|SPACTOKYO_453.04|SPBP22H7.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.698657807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777338	2539242	2542237	275812	278709	SPCC290.04	SPAC19E9.02	ams2	fin1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.978906898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777339	2539242	2541130	275812	277645	SPCC290.04	SPBC776.11	ams2	rpl2801	SPCC4F11.01	rpl28-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462202928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777340	2539242	2540068	275812	276606	SPCC290.04	SPBC1734.12c	ams2	alg12	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699939963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777341	2539242	2542953	275812	279393	SPCC290.04	SPAC1006.06	ams2	rgf2	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.8528179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777342	2539242	2539939	275812	276483	SPCC290.04	SPBC11G11.01	ams2	fis1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383375075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777343	2539242	2541853	275812	278344	SPCC290.04	SPAC2F3.11	ams2	SPAC2F3.11	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449939305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777344	2539242	2540433	275812	276961	SPCC290.04	SPBC2D10.06	ams2	rep1	SPCC4F11.01	rec16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.414403596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777345	2539242	2542470	275812	278931	SPCC290.04	SPAC19G12.04	ams2	dal1	SPCC4F11.01	SPAC19G12.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.849515876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777346	2539242	2541117	275812	277632	SPCC290.04	SPBC646.13	ams2	sds23	SPCC4F11.01	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.496960607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777347	2539242	2540161	275812	276696	SPCC290.04	SPBC13E7.03c	ams2	SPBC13E7.03c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.023332154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777348	2539242	2542502	275812	278960	SPCC290.04	SPAC139.06	ams2	hat1	SPCC4F11.01	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.071189653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777349	2539242	2541633	275812	278129	SPCC290.04	SPAC664.01c	ams2	swi6	SPCC4F11.01	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.42695367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777350	2539242	2543572	275812	279987	SPCC290.04	SPAC4G8.04	ams2	SPAC4G8.04	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935725072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777351	2539242	2540168	275812	276703	SPCC290.04	SPBC1683.06c	ams2	SPBC1683.06c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.259720876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777352	2539242	2539944	275812	276488	SPCC290.04	SPBC1198.06c	ams2	SPBC1198.06c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.315930691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777353	2539242	2541766	275812	278260	SPCC290.04	SPAC139.04c	ams2	fap2	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040958895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777354	2539242	2543164	275812	279595	SPCC290.04	SPAC3G6.06c	ams2	rad2	SPCC4F11.01	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513994978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777355	2539242	2542492	275812	278951	SPCC290.04	SPAC1B9.02c	ams2	sck1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386597624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777356	2539242	2539800	275812	276350	SPCC290.04	SPBC1347.13c	ams2	mrm1	SPCC4F11.01	SPBC1347.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864493306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777357	2539242	2542614	275812	279068	SPCC290.04	SPAC1399.04c	ams2	SPAC1399.04c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1006535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777358	2539242	2539890	275812	276436	SPCC290.04	SPBC16C6.03c	ams2	SPBC16C6.03c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.85091119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777359	2539242	2541771	275812	278265	SPCC290.04	SPAC23H3.06	ams2	apl6	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.824510904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777360	2539242	2542986	275812	279424	SPCC290.04	SPAC11D3.14c	ams2	SPAC11D3.14c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.500514551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777361	2539242	2542103	275812	278579	SPCC290.04	SPAC31G5.11	ams2	pac2	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.004201638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777362	2539242	2540717	275812	277240	SPCC290.04	SPBC577.12	ams2	dph6	SPCC4F11.01	mug71	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.39100907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777363	2539242	2541098	275812	277613	SPCC290.04	SPBC577.13	ams2	syj2	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390759975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777364	2539242	2540579	275812	277105	SPCC290.04	SPBC28E12.02	ams2	SPBC28E12.02	SPCC4F11.01	SPBC9B6.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.683881808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777365	2539242	2542345	275812	278811	SPCC290.04	SPAC1705.02	ams2	SPAC1705.02	SPCC4F11.01	SPAC1F2.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049438797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777366	2539242	2540455	275812	276983	SPCC290.04	SPBC215.05	ams2	gpd1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.121017927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777367	2539242	2540664	275812	277189	SPCC290.04	SPBC215.02	ams2	bob1	SPCC4F11.01	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.201396325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777368	2539242	2541361	275812	277872	SPCC290.04	SPBP8B7.10c	ams2	utp16	SPCC4F11.01	SPBP8B7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.682486894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777369	2539242	2543098	275812	279530	SPCC290.04	SPAC4A8.06c	ams2	SPAC4A8.06c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036952349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777370	2539242	2540999	275812	277515	SPCC290.04	SPBC4B4.04	ams2	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.871159504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777371	2539242	2540975	275812	277491	SPCC290.04	SPBC354.12	ams2	gpd3	SPCC4F11.01	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567061229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777372	2539242	2539420	275812	275985	SPCC290.04	SPCC970.07c	ams2	raf2	SPCC4F11.01	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.399270362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777373	2539242	2541795	275812	278286	SPCC290.04	SPAC2E1P3.02c	ams2	amt3	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.814406663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777374	2539242	2541200	275812	277714	SPCC290.04	SPBC8D2.03c	ams2	hhf2	SPCC4F11.01	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.590662233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777375	2539242	2540560	275812	277087	SPCC290.04	SPBC2D10.14c	ams2	myo51	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.83669333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777376	2539242	2542468	275812	278929	SPCC290.04	SPAC1D4.09c	ams2	rtf2	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.987574377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777377	2539242	2542450	275812	278911	SPCC290.04	SPAC13C5.04	ams2	SPAC13C5.04	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.324375925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777378	2539242	2541012	275812	277527	SPCC290.04	SPBC3H7.12	ams2	rav2	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.613838334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777379	2539242	2540979	275812	277495	SPCC290.04	SPBC3H7.10	ams2	elp6	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.926680922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777380	2539242	2541092	275812	277607	SPCC290.04	SPBC660.12c	ams2	egt2	SPCC4F11.01	SPBC660.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.917084463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777381	2539242	2540243	275812	276775	SPCC290.04	SPBC32H8.13c	ams2	mok12	SPCC4F11.01	SPACTOKYO_453.25c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386832968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777382	2539242	2541498	275812	278000	SPCC290.04	SPAC227.10	ams2	SPAC227.10	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504179341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777383	2539242	2542714	275812	279167	SPCC290.04	SPAC5H10.06c	ams2	adh4	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994325684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777384	2539242	2541682	275812	278178	SPCC290.04	SPAC15F9.02	ams2	seh1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8781765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777385	2539242	2542669	275812	279122	SPCC290.04	SPAC29B12.08	ams2	clr5	SPCC4F11.01	SPAC29B12.08	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.203551245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777386	2539242	2542299	275812	278766	SPCC290.04	SPAC18B11.10	ams2	tup11	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.280786784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777387	2539242	2542689	275812	279142	SPCC290.04	SPAC29B12.04	ams2	snz1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.926301114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777388	2539242	2540919	275812	277435	SPCC290.04	SPBC543.07	ams2	pek1	SPCC4F11.01	mkk1|skh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980770374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777389	2539242	2543159	275812	279590	SPCC290.04	SPAC3C7.09	ams2	set8	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773651712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777390	2539242	2539606	275812	276164	SPCC290.04	SPBC15D4.05	ams2	SPBC15D4.05	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.517747474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777391	2539242	2539434	275812	275997	SPCC290.04	SPCC757.09c	ams2	rnc1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.433481098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777392	2539242	2542555	275812	279012	SPCC290.04	SPAC1952.06c	ams2	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923759927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777393	2539242	2541119	275812	277634	SPCC290.04	SPBC651.11c	ams2	apm3	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778587335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777394	2539242	2539937	275812	276481	SPCC290.04	SPBC1539.08	ams2	arf6	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.744196278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777395	2539242	2541761	275812	278255	SPCC290.04	SPAC7D4.12c	ams2	SPAC7D4.12c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.100390253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777396	2539242	2540463	275812	276991	SPCC290.04	SPBC2F12.15c	ams2	pfa3	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819089717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777397	2539242	2541669	275812	278165	SPCC290.04	SPAC22G7.07c	ams2	ime4	SPCC4F11.01	SPAC22G7.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.41454853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777398	2539242	2540993	275812	277509	SPCC290.04	SPBC342.01c	ams2	alg6	SPCC4F11.01	SPBC3F6.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511355353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777399	2539242	2540727	275812	277250	SPCC290.04	SPBC1921.03c	ams2	mex67	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714717005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777400	2539242	2542165	275812	278641	SPCC290.04	SPAC1782.08c	ams2	rex3	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.840402521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777401	2539242	2542135	275812	278611	SPCC290.04	SPAC13A11.04c	ams2	ubp8	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.971421344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777402	2539242	2542277	275812	278746	SPCC290.04	SPAC17A5.02c	ams2	dbr1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.848057703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777403	2539242	2543685	275812	280099	SPCC290.04	SPAC3C7.03c	ams2	rad55	SPCC4F11.01	rhp55	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.969209191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777404	2539242	2539823	275812	276373	SPCC290.04	SPBC16A3.18	ams2	cip1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.753870039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777405	2539242	2541866	275812	278356	SPCC290.04	SPAC23H3.11c	ams2	SPAC23H3.11c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77008577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777406	2539242	2541580	275812	278077	SPCC290.04	SPAC1687.05	ams2	pli1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.008916197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777407	2539242	2539175	275812	275746	SPCC290.04	SPCC16C4.01	ams2	sif2	SPCC4F11.01	SPCC5E4.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.089200723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777408	2539242	2539822	275812	276372	SPCC290.04	SPBC16G5.02c	ams2	SPBC16G5.02c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196947499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777409	2539242	2542649	275812	279103	SPCC290.04	SPAC24C9.14	ams2	otu1	SPCC4F11.01	mug141	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039154711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777410	2539242	2541923	275812	278411	SPCC290.04	SPAC23C4.09c	ams2	SPAC23C4.09c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.871134117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777411	2539242	2540059	275812	276597	SPCC290.04	SPBC1198.01	ams2	fmd2	SPCC4F11.01	SPBC1198.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.409707136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777412	2539242	2539820	275812	276370	SPCC290.04	SPBC1709.13c	ams2	set10	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713594855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777413	2539242	2543551	275812	279968	SPCC290.04	SPAC4G8.06c	ams2	trm12	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817061493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777414	2539242	2543563	275812	279979	SPCC290.04	SPAC664.02c	ams2	arp8	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.969870598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777415	2539242	2543584	275812	279999	SPCC290.04	SPAPB1E7.11c	ams2	SPAPB1E7.11c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876970124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777416	2539242	2541014	275812	277529	SPCC290.04	SPBC3D6.06c	ams2	prs5	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.876839036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777417	2539242	2543078	275812	279511	SPCC290.04	SPAC31A2.15c	ams2	dcc1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.944923196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777418	2539242	2541663	275812	278159	SPCC290.04	SPAC22G7.08	ams2	ppk8	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.871960237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777419	2539242	2542253	275812	278723	SPCC290.04	SPAC17H9.04c	ams2	SPAC17H9.04c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.399156629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777420	2539242	2542845	275812	279291	SPCC290.04	SPAC824.04	ams2	SPAC824.04	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.087135656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777421	2539242	2542213	275812	278687	SPCC290.04	SPAC3G6.13c	ams2	rpl4101	SPCC4F11.01	rpl41-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.508270765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777422	2539242	2540825	275812	277343	SPCC290.04	SPBC428.08c	ams2	clr4	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.082232808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777423	2539242	2541926	275812	278414	SPCC290.04	SPAC222.14c	ams2	SPAC222.14c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.999259689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777424	2539242	2542558	275812	279014	SPCC290.04	SPAC1952.07	ams2	rad1	SPCC4F11.01	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.051195405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777425	2539242	2540303	275812	276833	SPCC290.04	SPBC354.01	ams2	gtp1	SPCC4F11.01	SPBC649.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.58171122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777426	2539242	2541021	275812	277536	SPCC290.04	SPBC3B8.10c	ams2	nem1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.408801567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777427	2539242	2540893	275812	277409	SPCC290.04	SPBC543.10	ams2	get1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.61584393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777428	2539242	2542331	275812	278797	SPCC290.04	SPAC1834.05	ams2	alg9	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636482404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777429	2539242	2542239	275812	278711	SPCC290.04	SPAC18G6.02c	ams2	chp1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.48943755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777430	2539242	2541544	275812	278044	SPCC290.04	SPAC22G7.06c	ams2	ura1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819249566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777431	2539242	2542268	275812	278737	SPCC290.04	SPAC17A5.07c	ams2	ulp2	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.158367369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777432	2539242	2541700	275812	278196	SPCC290.04	SPAC32A11.02c	ams2	SPAC32A11.02c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035566031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777433	2539242	2539388	275812	275953	SPCC290.04	SPCC24B10.12	ams2	cgi121	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.230399204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777434	2539242	2542394	275812	278858	SPCC290.04	SPAC31G5.12c	ams2	maf1	SPCC4F11.01	n150	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.77260923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777435	2539242	2543514	275812	279932	SPCC290.04	SPAC4D7.03	ams2	pop2	SPCC4F11.01	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.186075578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777436	2539242	2539804	275812	276354	SPCC290.04	SPBC1105.11c	ams2	hht3	SPCC4F11.01	h3.3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.995770301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777437	2539242	2540631	275812	277157	SPCC290.04	SPBC25B2.10	ams2	SPBC25B2.10	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.340239914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777438	2539242	2541801	275812	278292	SPCC290.04	SPAC2F7.08c	ams2	snf5	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048372157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777439	2539242	2543461	275812	279881	SPCC290.04	SPAC521.03	ams2	SPAC521.03	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.151353822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777440	2539242	2540894	275812	277410	SPCC290.04	SPBC530.04	ams2	mod5	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.713506614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777441	2539242	2543511	275812	279929	SPCC290.04	SPAC4G9.19	ams2	SPAC4G9.19	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.402771081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777442	2539242	2542646	275812	279100	SPCC290.04	SPAC11H11.05c	ams2	fta6	SPCC4F11.01	sma6	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.810899485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777443	2539242	2541754	275812	278248	SPCC290.04	SPAC2E1P3.04	ams2	cao1	SPCC4F11.01	spao1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096195065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777444	2539242	2543445	275812	279865	SPCC290.04	SPAC4F10.13c	ams2	mpd2	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.866045709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777445	2539242	2542463	275812	278924	SPCC290.04	SPAC1834.03c	ams2	hhf1	SPCC4F11.01	h4.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.674502502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777446	2539242	2542776	275812	279225	SPCC290.04	SPAC167.01	ams2	ire1	SPCC4F11.01	ppk4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771224269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777447	2539242	2540348	275812	276877	SPCC290.04	SPBC29A10.05	ams2	exo1	SPCC4F11.01	mut2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.330448492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777448	2539242	2540338	275812	276867	SPCC290.04	SPBC2G2.13c	ams2	dcd1	SPCC4F11.01	SPBC2G2.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.610213103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777449	2539242	2540922	275812	277438	SPCC290.04	SPBC36.10	ams2	SPBC36.10	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.496985429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777450	2539242	2542123	275812	278599	SPCC290.04	SPAC18G6.15	ams2	mal3	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.58073533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777451	2539242	2542544	275812	279001	SPCC290.04	SPAC18G6.10	ams2	lem2	SPCC4F11.01	heh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.118444036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777452	2539242	2542507	275812	278965	SPCC290.04	SPAC18G6.13	ams2	SPAC18G6.13	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.668002579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777453	2539242	2543412	275812	279834	SPCC290.04	SPAC637.07	ams2	moe1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.691523166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777454	2539242	2539733	275812	276285	SPCC290.04	SPBC16E9.12c	ams2	pab2	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.23019252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777455	2539242	2540396	275812	276924	SPCC290.04	SPBC31F10.12	ams2	tma20	SPCC4F11.01	SPBC31F10.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196198849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777456	2539242	2542971	275812	279410	SPCC290.04	SPAC105.02c	ams2	SPAC105.02c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446929859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777457	2539242	2541889	275812	278379	SPCC290.04	SPAC2F7.03c	ams2	pom1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.170331053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777458	2539242	2541928	275812	278416	SPCC290.04	SPAC227.03c	ams2	SPAC227.03c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813363148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777459	2539242	2540852	275812	277369	SPCC290.04	SPBC428.12c	ams2	SPBC428.12c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.050191574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777460	2539242	2543531	275812	279949	SPCC290.04	SPAC926.06c	ams2	SPAC926.06c	SPCC4F11.01	lrr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.198412697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777461	2539242	2539484	275812	276047	SPCC290.04	SPCC594.04c	ams2	SPCC594.04c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.669693472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777462	2539242	2542235	275812	278707	SPCC290.04	SPAC18G6.05c	ams2	SPAC18G6.05c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.982783539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777463	2539242	2542873	275812	279318	SPCC290.04	SPAC9G1.02	ams2	wis4	SPCC4F11.01	wak1|wik1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.28126784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777464	2539242	2539999	275812	276543	SPCC290.04	SPBC1734.15	ams2	rsc4	SPCC4F11.01	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.447786432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777465	2539242	2541096	275812	277611	SPCC290.04	SPBC725.10	ams2	SPBC725.10	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978027859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777466	2539242	2539689	275812	276244	SPCC290.04	SPBC1861.03	ams2	mak10	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.906895637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777467	2539242	2541929	275812	278417	SPCC290.04	SPAC23C4.12	ams2	hhp2	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.489715218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777468	2539242	2543246	275812	279674	SPCC290.04	SPAPB8E5.05	ams2	mfm1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091490225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777469	2539242	2539857	275812	276404	SPCC290.04	SPBC1604.20c	ams2	tea2	SPCC4F11.01	klp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099878647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777470	2539242	3361455	275812	280531	SPCC290.04	SPAC1782.01	ams2	ecm29	SPCC4F11.01	SPAPYUG7.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147914608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777471	2539242	2542193	275812	278668	SPCC290.04	SPAC9G1.11c	ams2	spn4	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.666044947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777472	2539242	2540086	275812	276624	SPCC290.04	SPBC16H5.12c	ams2	SPBC16H5.12c	SPCC4F11.01	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.435209503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777473	2539242	2542857	275812	279303	SPCC290.04	SPAC144.06	ams2	apl5	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.056895822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777474	2539242	2539624	275812	276181	SPCC290.04	SPBC1289.16c	ams2	cao2	SPCC4F11.01	SPBC8E4.06|spao2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.80881937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777475	2539242	2540326	275812	276856	SPCC290.04	SPBC2G5.06c	ams2	hmt2	SPCC4F11.01	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189569101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777476	2539242	2541824	275812	278315	SPCC290.04	SPAC27E2.02	ams2	SPAC27E2.02	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.081506578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777477	2539242	2539667	275812	276222	SPCC290.04	SPBC13G1.08c	ams2	ash2	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634305941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777478	2539242	2542032	275812	278514	SPCC290.04	SPAC23C11.04c	ams2	pnk1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.825996732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777479	2539242	2540200	275812	276733	SPCC290.04	SPBC1709.06	ams2	dus2	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.561454885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777480	2539242	2541326	275812	277838	SPCC290.04	SPBP35G2.03c	ams2	sgo1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205714701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777481	2539242	2540675	275812	277200	SPCC290.04	SPBC21H7.07c	ams2	his5	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.10084534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777482	2539242	2538849	275812	275430	SPCC290.04	SPCC330.14c	ams2	rpl2402	SPCC4F11.01	rpl24-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.25095254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777483	2539242	2542315	275812	278781	SPCC290.04	SPAC16C9.01c	ams2	SPAC16C9.01c	SPCC4F11.01	SPAC4G8.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.566676466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777484	2539242	2540232	275812	276764	SPCC290.04	SPBC336.10c	ams2	tif512	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.97973186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777485	2539242	2543378	275812	279800	SPCC290.04	SPAC3H8.07c	ams2	pac10	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.521096115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777486	2539242	2542254	275812	278724	SPCC290.04	SPAC30D11.04c	ams2	nup124	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.134189455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777487	2539242	2543301	275812	279726	SPCC290.04	SPAC977.17	ams2	SPAC977.17	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.265187782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777488	2539242	2543311	275812	279735	SPCC290.04	SPAC977.15	ams2	SPAC977.15	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808811987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777489	2539242	2540741	275812	277264	SPCC290.04	SPBC83.05	ams2	SPBC83.05	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.319836045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777490	2539242	2538767	275812	275350	SPCC290.04	SPCC1672.12c	ams2	get4	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.315462646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777491	2539242	2543080	275812	279513	SPCC290.04	SPAC3A11.10c	ams2	SPAC3A11.10c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875402112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777492	2539242	2540094	275812	276632	SPCC290.04	SPBC146.10	ams2	mug57	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.320703705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777493	2539242	2542056	275812	278535	SPCC290.04	SPAC6G9.14	ams2	SPAC6G9.14	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.400460568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777494	2539242	2540990	275812	277506	SPCC290.04	SPBC36B7.06c	ams2	mug20	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.670281944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777495	2539242	2541389	275812	277900	SPCC290.04	SPBPB2B2.09c	ams2	SPBPB2B2.09c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.126125078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777496	2539242	2539611	275812	276169	SPCC290.04	SPBC1734.09	ams2	yea4	SPCC4F11.01	SPBC1734.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.945925389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777497	2539242	2541112	275812	277627	SPCC290.04	SPBC725.07	ams2	pex5	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514805896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777498	2539242	2542951	275812	279391	SPCC290.04	SPAC1071.05	ams2	SPAC1071.05	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.261296454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777499	2539242	2541464	275812	277966	SPCC290.04	SPAC222.08c	ams2	SPAC222.08c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820840447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777500	2539242	2540967	275812	277483	SPCC290.04	SPBC36B7.08c	ams2	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.714948562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777501	2539242	2542267	275812	278736	SPCC290.04	SPAPYUK71.03c	ams2	syn1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.458331862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777502	2539242	2539847	275812	276395	SPCC290.04	SPBC530.14c	ams2	dsk1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.682511303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777503	2539242	2539363	275812	275929	SPCC290.04	SPCC613.02	ams2	SPCC613.02	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195041675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777504	2539242	2540599	275812	277125	SPCC290.04	SPBC29A3.10c	ams2	atp14	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.648250699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777505	2539242	2543517	275812	279935	SPCC290.04	SPAC3G9.05	ams2	spa2	SPCC4F11.01	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452846903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777506	2539242	2542773	275812	279222	SPCC290.04	SPAC16.01	ams2	rho2	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.711086427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777507	2539242	2541296	275812	277808	SPCC290.04	SPBP8B7.06	ams2	rpp201	SPCC4F11.01	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.565694862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777508	2539242	2539344	275812	275910	SPCC290.04	SPCC1672.09	ams2	SPCC1672.09	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865848029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777509	2539242	2541565	275812	278063	SPCC290.04	SPAC1250.03	ams2	ubc14	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201882725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777510	2539242	2538690	275812	275275	SPCC290.04	SPCC1393.05	ams2	ers1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.27184316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777511	2539242	2542550	275812	279007	SPCC290.04	SPAC1B3.02c	ams2	SPAC1B3.02c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.874908249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777512	2539242	2538884	275812	275462	SPCC290.04	SPCC1393.08	ams2	SPCC1393.08	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713953215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777513	2539242	2542187	275812	278662	SPCC290.04	SPAC57A7.09	ams2	SPAC57A7.09	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.206224717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777514	2539242	2542829	275812	279276	SPCC290.04	SPAC13D6.02c	ams2	byr3	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.760792869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777515	2539242	2541746	275812	278240	SPCC290.04	SPAC20G4.04c	ams2	hus1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582394545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777516	2539242	2540193	275812	276726	SPCC290.04	SPBC1289.10c	ams2	adn2	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.131523086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777517	2539242	2540005	275812	276549	SPCC290.04	SPBC1347.09	ams2	SPBC1347.09	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.610326172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777518	2539242	2541337	275812	277848	SPCC290.04	SPBP35G2.13c	ams2	swc2	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448619838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777519	2539242	2543254	275812	279682	SPCC290.04	SPAC1006.03c	ams2	red1	SPCC4F11.01	iss3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.946074022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777520	2539242	2543139	275812	279571	SPCC290.04	SPAC12G12.03	ams2	cip2	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.331332003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777521	2539242	2543515	275812	279933	SPCC290.04	SPAC4F10.14c	ams2	btf3	SPCC4F11.01	btt1|egd1|nac2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038666317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777522	2539242	2540930	275812	277446	SPCC290.04	SPBC354.10	ams2	def1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.398453256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777523	2539242	2538848	275812	275429	SPCC290.04	SPCC613.12c	ams2	raf1	SPCC4F11.01	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.339405262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777524	2539242	3361520	275812	280596	SPCC290.04	SPAC1610.02c	ams2	SPAC1610.02c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.001461299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777525	2539242	2541017	275812	277532	SPCC290.04	SPBC36.07	ams2	elp1	SPCC4F11.01	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148677424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777526	2539242	2541713	275812	278208	SPCC290.04	SPAC3A12.12	ams2	atp11	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820497224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777527	2539242	2540821	275812	277339	SPCC290.04	SPBC800.03	ams2	clr3	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317395883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777528	2539242	2539538	275812	276100	SPCC290.04	SPCC364.06	ams2	nap1	SPCC4F11.01	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.684765929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777529	2539242	2539932	275812	276476	SPCC290.04	SPBC13E7.07	ams2	SPBC13E7.07	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865168429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777530	2539242	2539908	275812	276454	SPCC290.04	SPBC13E7.06	ams2	msd1	SPCC4F11.01	mug172	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815401598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777531	2539242	2539763	275812	276314	SPCC290.04	SPBC1861.05	ams2	SPBC1861.05	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.329481692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777532	2539242	2540001	275812	276545	SPCC290.04	SPBC1289.13c	ams2	gmh6	SPCC4F11.01	SPBC1289.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.466876782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777533	2539242	2540910	275812	277426	SPCC290.04	SPBC577.02	ams2	rpl3801	SPCC4F11.01	rpl38-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.921586187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777534	2539242	2541670	275812	278166	SPCC290.04	SPAC24H6.13	ams2	SPAC24H6.13	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035908737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777535	2539242	2542198	275812	278673	SPCC290.04	SPAC6F12.09	ams2	rdp1	SPCC4F11.01	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.16046001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777536	2539242	2541786	275812	278278	SPCC290.04	SPAC22F3.08c	ams2	rok1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77154105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777537	2539242	2541156	275812	277671	SPCC290.04	SPBC685.07c	ams2	rpl2701	SPCC4F11.01	rpl27-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.190091411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777538	2539242	2542619	275812	279073	SPCC290.04	SPAC6G10.02c	ams2	tea3	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096753845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777539	2539242	2539362	275812	275928	SPCC290.04	SPCC18B5.10c	ams2	SPCC18B5.10c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.867088512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777540	2539242	2541287	275812	277800	SPCC290.04	SPBP22H7.05c	ams2	abo2	SPCC4F11.01	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.130756522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777541	2539242	2540619	275812	277145	SPCC290.04	SPBC25H2.15	ams2	SPBC25H2.15	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.946199532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777542	2539242	2542767	275812	279217	SPCC290.04	SPAC1565.07c	ams2	knd1	SPCC4F11.01	SPAC1565.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098970912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777543	2539242	2542167	275812	278642	SPCC290.04	SPAC17C9.11c	ams2	SPAC17C9.11c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143176627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777544	2539242	2543071	275812	279504	SPCC290.04	SPAC3C7.06c	ams2	pit1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.281048384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777545	2539242	2542730	275812	279180	SPCC290.04	SPAC25B8.15c	ams2	SPAC25B8.15c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441860631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777546	2539242	2543106	275812	279538	SPCC290.04	SPAC3A11.13	ams2	SPAC3A11.13	SPCC4F11.01	SPAC3H5.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.395534466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777547	2539242	2543567	275812	279983	SPCC290.04	SPAC890.03	ams2	ppk16	SPCC4F11.01	mug92	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152640523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777548	2539242	2541371	275812	277882	SPCC290.04	SPBP4H10.17c	ams2	SPBP4H10.17c	SPCC4F11.01	mrps2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147506849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777549	2539242	2540498	275812	277026	SPCC290.04	SPBC27.02c	ams2	ask1	SPCC4F11.01	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.915701269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777550	2539242	2542915	275812	279357	SPCC290.04	SPAC6C3.06c	ams2	SPAC6C3.06c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809157242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777551	2539242	2540044	275812	276582	SPCC290.04	SPBC1778.04	ams2	spo6	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.620309121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777552	2539242	2541973	275812	278458	SPCC290.04	SPAC6G9.13c	ams2	bqt1	SPCC4F11.01	mug23|rec26	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924139257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777553	2539242	2539925	275812	276469	SPCC290.04	SPBC16H5.13	ams2	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.937113975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777554	2539242	2542515	275812	278973	SPCC290.04	SPAC1952.09c	ams2	SPAC1952.09c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.99158356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777555	2539242	2541689	275812	278185	SPCC290.04	SPAC24C9.05c	ams2	mug70	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.253293844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777556	2539242	2541027	275812	277542	SPCC290.04	SPBC409.16c	ams2	saw1	SPCC4F11.01	SPBC409.16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.188499515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777557	2539242	2539296	275812	275864	SPCC290.04	SPCC1235.03	ams2	cue2	SPCC4F11.01	SPCC1235.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3341184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777558	2539242	2538717	275812	275301	SPCC290.04	SPCC1235.02	ams2	bio2	SPCC4F11.01	SPCC320.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.048625243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777559	2539242	2538714	275812	275298	SPCC290.04	SPCC330.11	ams2	btb1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447160203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777560	2539242	2541432	275812	277937	SPCC290.04	SPAC1F5.05c	ams2	mso1	SPCC4F11.01	SPAC1F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.027771133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777561	2539242	2543066	275812	279499	SPCC290.04	SPAC343.12	ams2	rds1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867709884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777562	2539242	2540089	275812	276627	SPCC290.04	SPBC32H8.01c	ams2	SPBC32H8.01c	SPCC4F11.01	SPBP22H7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.445546393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777563	2539242	2541459	275812	277961	SPCC290.04	SPAC227.11c	ams2	SPAC227.11c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.872310236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777564	2539242	2542458	275812	278919	SPCC290.04	SPAC30.02c	ams2	SPAC30.02c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932609799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777565	2539242	2538756	275812	275339	SPCC290.04	SPCC1795.10c	ams2	SPCC1795.10c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.202874556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777566	2539242	2541531	275812	278031	SPCC290.04	SPAC25A8.01c	ams2	fft3	SPCC4F11.01	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980386755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777567	2539242	2542418	275812	278881	SPCC290.04	SPAC1805.07c	ams2	dad2	SPCC4F11.01	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.916331195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777568	2539242	2538916	275812	275493	SPCC290.04	SPCC16C4.17	ams2	mug123	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256932444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777569	2539242	2540345	275812	276874	SPCC290.04	SPBC19C7.09c	ams2	uve1	SPCC4F11.01	uvde	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924388504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777570	2539242	2542042	275812	278523	SPCC290.04	SPAC23A1.14c	ams2	SPAC23A1.14c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450213137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777571	2539242	2541229	275812	277743	SPCC290.04	SPBC839.05c	ams2	rps1701	SPCC4F11.01	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.048144186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777572	2539242	2541036	275812	277551	SPCC290.04	SPBC3H7.05c	ams2	SPBC3H7.05c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.661150094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777573	2539242	2542403	275812	278867	SPCC290.04	SPAC19A8.05c	ams2	sst4	SPCC4F11.01	vps27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701586271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777574	2539242	2541535	275812	278035	SPCC290.04	SPAC12G12.10	ams2	wdr21	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.058810245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777575	2539242	2543091	275812	279524	SPCC290.04	SPAC12G12.15	ams2	sif3	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.941603847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777576	2539242	2539722	275812	276275	SPCC290.04	SPBC14F5.11c	ams2	mug186	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865922266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777577	2539242	2543228	275812	279656	SPCC290.04	SPAC6B12.04c	ams2	SPAC6B12.04c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.34485927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777578	2539242	2543473	275812	279893	SPCC290.04	SPAC513.06c	ams2	SPAC513.06c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86577322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777579	2539242	2542685	275812	279138	SPCC290.04	SPAC26A3.06	ams2	bud23	SPCC4F11.01	SPAC26A3.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037394911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777580	2539242	2541789	275812	278281	SPCC290.04	SPAC23H4.08	ams2	iwr1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505123977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777581	2539242	2540182	275812	276715	SPCC290.04	SPBC16G5.06	ams2	SPBC16G5.06	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.766638682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777582	2539242	2542891	275812	279335	SPCC290.04	SPAC6F12.12	ams2	par2	SPCC4F11.01	pbp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.119891135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777583	2539242	2540992	275812	277508	SPCC290.04	SPBC342.05	ams2	crb2	SPCC4F11.01	rhp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.055610055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777584	2539242	2540568	275812	277095	SPCC290.04	SPBC28F2.08c	ams2	SPBC28F2.08c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.648079619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777585	2539242	2540927	275812	277443	SPCC290.04	SPBC365.06	ams2	pmt3	SPCC4F11.01	smt3|ubl2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.263910211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777586	2539242	2541115	275812	277630	SPCC290.04	SPBC660.07	ams2	ntp1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.383759973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777587	2539242	2542250	275812	278720	SPCC290.04	SPAC17D4.03c	ams2	cis4	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.924567049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777588	2539242	2540936	275812	277452	SPCC290.04	SPBC800.05c	ams2	atb2	SPCC4F11.01	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.264116292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777589	2539242	2539702	275812	276255	SPCC290.04	SPBC1604.12	ams2	SPBC1604.12	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.953617729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777590	2539242	2543516	275812	279934	SPCC290.04	SPAC4F10.11	ams2	spn1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6208868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777591	2539242	2540489	275812	277017	SPCC290.04	SPBC25H2.03	ams2	SPBC25H2.03	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.569390118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777592	2539242	2540333	275812	276863	SPCC290.04	SPBC21B10.07	ams2	SPBC21B10.07	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.380938381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777593	2539242	2539170	275812	275741	SPCC290.04	SPCC306.02c	ams2	SPCC306.02c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.176012585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777594	2539242	3361511	275812	280587	SPCC290.04	SPAC23C4.08	ams2	rho3	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447448888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777595	2539242	2542116	275812	278592	SPCC290.04	SPAC1B3.15c	ams2	SPAC1B3.15c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041090856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777596	2539242	2540140	275812	276677	SPCC290.04	SPBC16C6.08c	ams2	qcr6	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.271729962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777597	2539242	2540188	275812	276721	SPCC290.04	SPBC17A3.02	ams2	SPBC17A3.02	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.988202194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777598	2539242	2539901	275812	276447	SPCC290.04	SPBC17A3.08	ams2	SPBC17A3.08	SPCC4F11.01	pi038	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.260094413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777599	2539242	2541941	275812	278428	SPCC290.04	SPAC20H4.03c	ams2	tfs1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.342370971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777600	2539242	2540134	275812	276671	SPCC290.04	SPBC17A3.03c	ams2	SPBC17A3.03c	SPCC4F11.01	pi043	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.935142161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777601	2539242	2542021	275812	278504	SPCC290.04	SPAP14E8.02	ams2	tos4	SPCC4F11.01	SPAP14E8.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875457647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777602	2539242	2539169	275812	275740	SPCC290.04	SPCC1235.11	ams2	mpc1	SPCC4F11.01	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.437635241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777603	2539242	2542716	275812	279169	SPCC290.04	SPAC25H1.07	ams2	emc1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148009323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777604	2539242	2543513	275812	279931	SPCC290.04	SPAC821.06	ams2	spn2	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.14018386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777605	2539242	2539700	275812	276253	SPCC290.04	SPBC1685.15c	ams2	klp6	SPCC4F11.01	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.422782455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777606	2539242	2539959	275812	276503	SPCC290.04	SPBC1703.11	ams2	SPBC1703.11	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326326666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777607	2539242	2541709	275812	278204	SPCC290.04	SPAC3C7.02c	ams2	pil2	SPCC4F11.01	SPAC3C7.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.457034655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777608	2539242	2541774	275812	278268	SPCC290.04	SPAC22E12.05c	ams2	rer1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.560466418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777609	2539242	2543387	275812	279809	SPCC290.04	SPAPB1E7.02c	ams2	mcl1	SPCC4F11.01	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.14176974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777610	2539242	2541627	275812	278123	SPCC290.04	SPAC1F5.08c	ams2	yam8	SPCC4F11.01	ehs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.614993917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777611	2539242	2541466	275812	277968	SPCC290.04	SPAC14C4.06c	ams2	nab2	SPCC4F11.01	SPAC14C4.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.674460419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777612	2539242	2539128	275812	275700	SPCC290.04	SPCC1682.06	ams2	SPCC1682.06	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193174011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777613	2539242	2543087	275812	279520	SPCC290.04	SPAC30C2.04	ams2	SPAC30C2.04	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.339343072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777614	2539242	2542175	275812	278650	SPCC290.04	SPAC1F3.02c	ams2	mkh1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.79075288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777615	2539242	2540314	275812	276844	SPCC290.04	SPBC2G5.03	ams2	ctu1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866694259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777616	2539242	2542566	275812	279022	SPCC290.04	SPAC8C9.12c	ams2	SPAC8C9.12c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.98986316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777617	2539242	2543587	275812	280002	SPCC290.04	SPAC4D7.02c	ams2	SPAC4D7.02c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093486846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777618	2539242	2539743	275812	276295	SPCC290.04	SPBC16A3.08c	ams2	oga1	SPCC4F11.01	SPBC16A3.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508390095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777619	2539242	2543151	275812	279583	SPCC290.04	SPAC343.06c	ams2	SPAC343.06c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.286285526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777620	2539242	2543372	275812	279794	SPCC290.04	SPAPB1A10.09	ams2	ase1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.028884697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777621	2539242	2539710	275812	276263	SPCC290.04	SPBC1683.08	ams2	ght4	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578295985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777622	2539242	2543644	275812	280058	SPCC290.04	SPAPB1A10.03	ams2	nxt1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.064954317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777623	2539242	2542111	275812	278587	SPCC290.04	SPAC1687.14c	ams2	SPAC1687.14c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818236956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777624	2539242	2540372	275812	276901	SPCC290.04	SPBC31F10.03	ams2	SPBC31F10.03	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.333524418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777625	2539242	2541177	275812	277691	SPCC290.04	SPBC725.05c	ams2	SPBC725.05c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.119452485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777626	2539242	2542656	275812	279110	SPCC290.04	SPAC2E1P3.05c	ams2	SPAC2E1P3.05c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154672521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777627	2539242	2540309	275812	276839	SPCC290.04	SPBC21B10.13c	ams2	yox1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.030907765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777628	2539242	2541062	275812	277577	SPCC290.04	SPBC660.11	ams2	tcg1	SPCC4F11.01	mug187	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.021546395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777629	2539242	2541228	275812	277742	SPCC290.04	SPBP16F5.08c	ams2	SPBP16F5.08c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930067096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777630	2539242	2539738	275812	276290	SPCC290.04	SPBC17G9.09	ams2	tif213	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.561524125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777631	2539242	2541875	275812	278365	SPCC290.04	SPAC22F3.06c	ams2	lon1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.566197979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777632	2539242	2542908	275812	279352	SPCC290.04	SPAC13G7.03	ams2	upf3	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.407202083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777633	2539242	2541893	275812	278383	SPCC290.04	SPAC23H4.13c	ams2	SPAC23H4.13c	SPCC4F11.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.410882016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777634	2538694	2542207	275279	278682	SPCC191.09c	SPAC17H9.10c	gst1	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.084410232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777635	2538694	2542701	275279	279154	SPCC191.09c	SPAC26H5.05	gst1	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.117426885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777636	2538694	2542555	275279	279012	SPCC191.09c	SPAC1952.06c	gst1	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.252840066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777637	2538694	2539937	275279	276481	SPCC191.09c	SPBC1539.08	gst1	arf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.322606467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777638	2538694	2542964	275279	279404	SPCC191.09c	SPAC12G12.07c	gst1	SPAC12G12.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925253562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777639	2538694	2541900	275279	278390	SPCC191.09c	SPAC23H4.17c	gst1	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.817169635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777640	2538694	2541142	275279	277657	SPCC191.09c	SPBC725.04	gst1	SPBC725.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711921167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777641	2538694	2541296	275279	277808	SPCC191.09c	SPBP8B7.06	gst1	rpp201	-	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.741432193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777642	2538694	2541680	275279	278176	SPCC191.09c	SPAC22F8.09	gst1	rrp16	-	nop53	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.441313567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777643	2538694	2540229	275279	276761	SPCC191.09c	SPBC31F10.15c	gst1	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.060370691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777644	2538694	2541488	275279	277990	SPCC191.09c	SPAC227.17c	gst1	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57149715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777645	2538694	2542725	275279	279176	SPCC191.09c	SPAC3A12.10	gst1	rpl2001	-	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64439873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777646	2538694	2540910	275279	277426	SPCC191.09c	SPBC577.02	gst1	rpl3801	-	rpl38-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640176588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777647	2538694	2541156	275279	277671	SPCC191.09c	SPBC685.07c	gst1	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.417608582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777648	2538694	2542516	275279	278974	SPCC191.09c	SPAC2F7.04	gst1	pmc2	-	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.856155445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777649	2538694	2541175	275279	277689	SPCC191.09c	SPBC839.13c	gst1	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.889089421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777650	2538694	2543066	275279	279499	SPCC191.09c	SPAC343.12	gst1	rds1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981061413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777651	2538694	2539013	275279	275586	SPCC191.09c	SPCC364.03	gst1	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.911996636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777652	2538694	2540699	275279	277223	SPCC191.09c	SPBC800.08	gst1	gcd10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.017455993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777653	2538694	2541229	275279	277743	SPCC191.09c	SPBC839.05c	gst1	rps1701	-	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506606923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777654	2538694	2541789	275279	278281	SPCC191.09c	SPAC23H4.08	gst1	iwr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.938384377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777655	2538694	2542175	275279	278650	SPCC191.09c	SPAC1F3.02c	gst1	mkh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.434617283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777656	2538694	2543501	275279	279919	SPCC191.09c	SPAC664.14	gst1	amt2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.10307917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777657	2539900	2542143	276446	278619	SPBC17D11.02c	SPAC17C9.07	hrd1	alg8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326653541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777658	2539900	2540415	276446	276943	SPBC17D11.02c	SPBC30B4.06c	hrd1	SPBC30B4.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.981390648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777659	2539900	2539628	276446	276185	SPBC17D11.02c	SPBC1604.03c	hrd1	SPBC1604.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451276849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777660	2539900	2542946	276446	279386	SPBC17D11.02c	SPAC6F12.03c	hrd1	fsv1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868955291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777661	2539900	2541053	276446	277568	SPBC17D11.02c	SPBC56F2.10c	hrd1	alg5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.810488728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777662	2539900	2539812	276446	276362	SPBC17D11.02c	SPBC1347.02	hrd1	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573918908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777663	2539900	2539519	276446	276081	SPBC17D11.02c	SPCC364.05	hrd1	vps3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870530136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777664	2539900	2540800	276446	277319	SPBC17D11.02c	SPBC409.20c	hrd1	psh3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.878051384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777665	2539900	2538916	276446	275493	SPBC17D11.02c	SPCC16C4.17	hrd1	mug123	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783508101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777666	2539900	2542262	276446	278731	SPBC17D11.02c	SPAC17C9.10	hrd1	stm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440574479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777667	2539900	2542716	276446	279169	SPBC17D11.02c	SPAC25H1.07	hrd1	emc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913544365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777668	2539900	2543387	276446	279809	SPBC17D11.02c	SPAPB1E7.02c	hrd1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.79965847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777669	2539900	2541297	276446	277809	SPBC17D11.02c	SPBC9B6.07	hrd1	nop52	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808608124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777670	2543189	2539050	279618	275623	SPAC30D11.09	SPCC11E10.08	cwf19	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.37420327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777671	2543189	2539147	279618	275719	SPAC30D11.09	SPCC622.12c	cwf19	gdh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.738688662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777672	2543189	2542895	279618	279339	SPAC30D11.09	SPAC13G6.10c	cwf19	asl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449362323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777673	2543189	2541343	279618	277854	SPAC30D11.09	SPBPB2B2.19c	cwf19	SPBPB2B2.19c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.516106811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777674	2543189	2541512	279618	278013	SPAC30D11.09	SPAC11E3.08c	cwf19	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.404680324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777675	2543189	2540131	279618	276668	SPAC30D11.09	SPBC1778.05c	cwf19	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513921535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777676	2543189	2540528	279618	277056	SPAC30D11.09	SPBC18H10.04c	cwf19	sce3	-	tif48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.827671874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777677	2543189	2539930	279618	276474	SPAC30D11.09	SPBC1198.11c	cwf19	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.214208799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777678	2543189	3361561	279618	280637	SPAC30D11.09	SPAC11E3.01c	cwf19	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.561152121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777679	2543189	2542747	279618	279197	SPAC30D11.09	SPAC15A10.06	cwf19	SPAC15A10.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.721257316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777680	2543189	2540347	279618	276876	SPAC30D11.09	SPBC30B4.08	cwf19	eri1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.822766183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777681	2543189	5802945	279618	858083	SPAC30D11.09	SPAC19G12.16c	cwf19	adg2	-	SPAC23A1.01c|mug46	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.316139785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777682	2543189	2539890	279618	276436	SPAC30D11.09	SPBC16C6.03c	cwf19	SPBC16C6.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.45980998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777683	2543189	2542040	279618	278521	SPAC30D11.09	SPAC212.01c	cwf19	SPAC212.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.331417124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777684	2543189	2541361	279618	277872	SPAC30D11.09	SPBP8B7.10c	cwf19	utp16	-	SPBP8B7.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807412139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777685	2543189	2539332	279618	275898	SPAC30D11.09	SPCPB1C11.01	cwf19	amt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.203599012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777686	2543189	2539420	279618	275985	SPAC30D11.09	SPCC970.07c	cwf19	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517730679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777687	2543189	2541200	279618	277714	SPAC30D11.09	SPBC8D2.03c	cwf19	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.312284382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777688	2543189	2539510	279618	276072	SPAC30D11.09	SPCC4G3.04c	cwf19	coq5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.047465617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777689	2543189	2542714	279618	279167	SPAC30D11.09	SPAC5H10.06c	cwf19	adh4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447279577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777690	2543189	2539564	279618	276125	SPAC30D11.09	SPCC550.12	cwf19	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.067585634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777691	2543189	2539434	279618	275997	SPAC30D11.09	SPCC757.09c	cwf19	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.587657537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777692	2543189	2539331	279618	275897	SPAC30D11.09	SPCC24B10.09	cwf19	rps1702	-	rps17|rps17-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81560234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777693	2543189	2542555	279618	279012	SPAC30D11.09	SPAC1952.06c	cwf19	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.823627396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777694	2543189	2539797	279618	276347	SPAC30D11.09	SPBC16G5.14c	cwf19	rps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.283539338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777695	2543189	2543048	279618	279483	SPAC30D11.09	SPAC3F10.02c	cwf19	trk1	-	sptrk	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514364108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777696	2543189	2541323	279618	277835	SPAC30D11.09	SPBP35G2.14	cwf19	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.836439297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777697	2543189	2543308	279618	279732	SPAC30D11.09	SPAC694.04c	cwf19	SPAC694.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.483630532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777698	2543189	2543584	279618	279999	SPAC30D11.09	SPAPB1E7.11c	cwf19	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.880715212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777699	2543189	2543426	279618	279846	SPAC30D11.09	SPAC631.02	cwf19	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.925834016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777700	2543189	2538972	279618	275546	SPAC30D11.09	SPCC1739.15	cwf19	wtf21	-	wtf3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.522010636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777701	2543189	2539381	279618	275947	SPAC30D11.09	SPCC1739.10	cwf19	mug33	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.380849618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777702	2543189	2540825	279618	277343	SPAC30D11.09	SPBC428.08c	cwf19	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.82977982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777703	2543189	2540964	279618	277480	SPAC30D11.09	SPBC365.16	cwf19	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.931717369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777704	2543189	2542568	279618	279024	SPAC30D11.09	SPAC1952.02	cwf19	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8613256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777705	2543189	2540647	279618	277172	SPAC30D11.09	SPBC18H10.07	cwf19	SPBC18H10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.866340393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777706	2543189	2539984	279618	276528	SPAC30D11.09	SPBC1289.11	cwf19	spf38	-	cwf17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.635631428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777707	2543189	2540546	279618	277073	SPAC30D11.09	SPBC25B2.06c	cwf19	btb2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44888941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777708	2543189	2542507	279618	278965	SPAC30D11.09	SPAC18G6.13	cwf19	SPAC18G6.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.654220671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777709	2543189	2539733	279618	276285	SPAC30D11.09	SPBC16E9.12c	cwf19	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.006407452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777710	2543189	2540673	279618	277198	SPAC30D11.09	SPBC1D7.03	cwf19	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.692435838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777711	2543189	2542921	279618	279362	SPAC30D11.09	SPAC1093.01	cwf19	ppr5	-	SPAC12B10.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.324470481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777712	2543189	2543667	279618	280081	SPAC30D11.09	SPAC4H3.02c	cwf19	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.042962557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777713	2543189	2540452	279618	276980	SPAC30D11.09	SPBC2A9.11c	cwf19	iss9	-	SPBC2A9.11c|SPBC2D10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.682084884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777714	2543189	2543643	279618	280057	SPAC30D11.09	SPAC3G9.07c	cwf19	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.231644447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777715	2543189	2541899	279618	278389	SPAC30D11.09	SPAC22E12.11c	cwf19	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.387323058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777716	2543189	2540086	279618	276624	SPAC30D11.09	SPBC16H5.12c	cwf19	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852415911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777717	2543189	2543250	279618	279678	SPAC30D11.09	SPAC3G9.15c	cwf19	fcf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.859577734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777718	2543189	2539667	279618	276222	SPAC30D11.09	SPBC13G1.08c	cwf19	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.14798686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777719	2543189	2542528	279618	278986	SPAC30D11.09	SPAC1B3.08	cwf19	SPAC1B3.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.241426612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777720	2543189	2542874	279618	279319	SPAC30D11.09	SPAC20H4.09	cwf19	SPAC20H4.09	-	SPAC145.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385011216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777721	2543189	2538818	279618	275399	SPAC30D11.09	SPCC645.12c	cwf19	SPCC645.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322497603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777722	2543189	2540836	279618	277354	SPAC30D11.09	SPBC18H10.19	cwf19	vps38	-	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.367829091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777723	2543189	2538841	279618	275422	SPAC30D11.09	SPCC550.03c	cwf19	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.318937688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777724	2543189	2543301	279618	279726	SPAC30D11.09	SPAC977.17	cwf19	SPAC977.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.317767592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777725	2543189	2539408	279618	275973	SPAC30D11.09	SPCC576.12c	cwf19	mhf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513420453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777726	2543189	2539481	279618	276044	SPAC30D11.09	SPCC622.16c	cwf19	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.398814416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777727	2543189	2539953	279618	276497	SPAC30D11.09	SPBC1709.11c	cwf19	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913120088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777728	2543189	2539213	279618	275783	SPAC30D11.09	SPCC285.10c	cwf19	SPCC285.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.692427994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777729	2543189	2541337	279618	277848	SPAC30D11.09	SPBP35G2.13c	cwf19	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.205381699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777730	2543189	2540643	279618	277168	SPAC30D11.09	SPBC19G7.06	cwf19	mbx1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.462566933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777731	2543189	2542875	279618	279320	SPAC30D11.09	SPAC13G7.02c	cwf19	ssa1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.746622499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777732	2543189	2540001	279618	276545	SPAC30D11.09	SPBC1289.13c	cwf19	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450835034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777733	2543189	2539706	279618	276259	SPAC30D11.09	SPBC16G5.13	cwf19	ptf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.069477315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777734	2543189	2540910	279618	277426	SPAC30D11.09	SPBC577.02	cwf19	rpl3801	-	rpl38-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3292177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777735	2543189	2539137	279618	275709	SPAC30D11.09	SPCC1682.08c	cwf19	mcp2	-	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.436158302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777736	2543189	2542881	279618	279326	SPAC30D11.09	SPAC13F5.03c	cwf19	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775707421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777737	2543189	2540152	279618	276688	SPAC30D11.09	SPBC12C2.03c	cwf19	SPBC12C2.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.973983994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777738	2543189	2538966	279618	275540	SPAC30D11.09	SPCC18.10	cwf19	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.564998278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777739	2543189	2543096	279618	279528	SPAC30D11.09	SPAC977.05c	cwf19	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708438165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777740	2543189	2542222	279618	278695	SPAC30D11.09	SPAC31G5.18c	cwf19	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.7894302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777741	2543189	2543649	279618	280063	SPAC30D11.09	SPAC3H5.11	cwf19	SPAC3H5.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.997535042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777742	2543189	2539668	279618	276223	SPAC30D11.09	SPBC11B10.10c	cwf19	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.812746627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777743	2543189	2541404	279618	277913	SPAC30D11.09	SPBPB2B2.18	cwf19	SPBPB2B2.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.845327281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777744	2543189	2538787	279618	275368	SPAC30D11.09	SPCC364.02c	cwf19	bis1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.179021315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777745	2543189	2539928	279618	276472	SPAC30D11.09	SPBC1604.08c	cwf19	imp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.871662792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777746	2543189	2542904	279618	279348	SPAC30D11.09	SPAC144.11	cwf19	rps1102	-	rps11|rps11-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048297763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777747	2543189	2543525	279618	279943	SPAC30D11.09	SPAC4A8.14	cwf19	SPAC4A8.14	-	prs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.837715879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777748	2543189	2540551	279618	277078	SPAC30D11.09	SPBC23E6.01c	cwf19	cxr1	-	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703698524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777749	2543189	2539178	279618	275749	SPAC30D11.09	SPCC1682.14	cwf19	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.215215806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777750	2543189	2541238	279618	277752	SPAC30D11.09	SPBC8E4.05c	cwf19	SPBC8E4.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.182216078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777751	2543189	2542716	279618	279169	SPAC30D11.09	SPAC25H1.07	cwf19	emc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.707652732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777752	2543189	2539085	279618	275657	SPAC30D11.09	SPCC285.15c	cwf19	rps2802	-	rps28|rps28-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.879679124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777753	2543189	2541124	279618	277639	SPAC30D11.09	SPBC646.02	cwf19	cwf11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.423141745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777754	2543189	2542561	279618	279017	SPAC30D11.09	SPAC31G5.17c	cwf19	rps1001	-	rps10-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.863660416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777755	2543189	2541576	279618	278073	SPAC30D11.09	SPBC1348.02	cwf19	SPBC1348.02	-	SPAC1348.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.51376915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777756	2543189	2541062	279618	277577	SPAC30D11.09	SPBC660.11	cwf19	tcg1	-	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513855302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777757	2543189	2541228	279618	277742	SPAC30D11.09	SPBP16F5.08c	cwf19	SPBP16F5.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.822356349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777758	2543189	2540320	279618	276850	SPAC30D11.09	SPBC3D6.04c	cwf19	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.188525634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777759	2540523	2541512	277051	278013	SPBC29A10.10c	SPAC11E3.08c	dbl8	nse6	SPBC29A10.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.046459225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777760	2540523	2541818	277051	278309	SPBC29A10.10c	SPAC11G7.02	dbl8	pub1	SPBC29A10.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.51584946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777761	2540523	2542273	277051	278742	SPBC29A10.10c	SPAC17H9.13c	dbl8	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC29A10.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633479988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777762	2540523	2541905	277051	278395	SPBC29A10.10c	SPAC6G9.01c	dbl8	SPAC6G9.01c	SPBC29A10.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92325046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777763	2540523	2542530	277051	278988	SPBC29A10.10c	SPAC1399.02	dbl8	SPAC1399.02	SPBC29A10.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779117984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777764	2540523	2540023	277051	276567	SPBC29A10.10c	SPBC11C11.10	dbl8	SPBC11C11.10	SPBC29A10.10c	SPBC3B8.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.304667697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777765	2540523	2542036	277051	278518	SPBC29A10.10c	SPAC23A1.19c	dbl8	hrq1	SPBC29A10.10c	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.861883653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777766	2540523	2542921	277051	279362	SPBC29A10.10c	SPAC1093.01	dbl8	ppr5	SPBC29A10.10c	SPAC12B10.18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044346889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777767	2540523	2538994	277051	275568	SPBC29A10.10c	SPCC553.01c	dbl8	dbl2	SPBC29A10.10c	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443478507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777768	2540523	2543250	277051	279678	SPBC29A10.10c	SPAC3G9.15c	dbl8	fcf2	SPBC29A10.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.644160327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777769	2540523	2539293	277051	275861	SPBC29A10.10c	SPCC553.08c	dbl8	ria1	SPBC29A10.10c	SPCC553.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.499468322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777770	2540523	2543244	277051	279672	SPBC29A10.10c	SPAC6B12.06c	dbl8	rrg9	SPBC29A10.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.776560437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777771	2540523	2541955	277051	278442	SPBC29A10.10c	SPAC5D6.04	dbl8	SPAC5D6.04	SPBC29A10.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330329904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777772	2540523	2540342	277051	276871	SPBC29A10.10c	SPBC2G2.01c	dbl8	liz1	SPBC29A10.10c	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512050161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777773	2540523	2539527	277051	276089	SPBC29A10.10c	SPCC338.16	dbl8	pof3	SPBC29A10.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.434841515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777774	2540523	2540691	277051	277216	SPBC29A10.10c	SPBC20F10.05	dbl8	nrl1	SPBC29A10.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.323322275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777775	2540523	2543619	277051	280033	SPBC29A10.10c	SPAC4F10.04	dbl8	ypa1	SPBC29A10.10c	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.713737891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777776	2540523	2540325	277051	276855	SPBC29A10.10c	SPBC21B10.10	dbl8	rps402	SPBC29A10.10c	rps4-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046178039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777777	2540523	2540064	277051	276602	SPBC29A10.10c	SPBC1718.02	dbl8	hop1	SPBC29A10.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779851763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777778	2540523	2543582	277051	279997	SPBC29A10.10c	SPAC4H3.06	dbl8	SPAC4H3.06	SPBC29A10.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331269186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777779	2540523	2543633	277051	280047	SPBC29A10.10c	SPAC3H8.05c	dbl8	mms1	SPBC29A10.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.795048744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777780	2540523	2543387	277051	279809	SPBC29A10.10c	SPAPB1E7.02c	dbl8	mcl1	SPBC29A10.10c	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.556722772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777781	2540523	2541062	277051	277577	SPBC29A10.10c	SPBC660.11	dbl8	tcg1	SPBC29A10.10c	mug187	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.248415992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777782	2540523	2539494	277051	276057	SPBC29A10.10c	SPCC4G3.08	dbl8	psk1	SPBC29A10.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865921123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777783	2540523	2539001	277051	275575	SPBC29A10.10c	SPCC1494.08c	dbl8	SPCC1494.08c	SPBC29A10.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876164498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777784	2540669	2541560	277194	278059	SPBC215.13	SPAC24B11.12c	SPBC215.13	SPAC24B11.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262368984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777785	2540669	2540886	277194	277403	SPBC215.13	SPBC4F6.10	SPBC215.13	vps901	-	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.566836216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777786	2540669	2542710	277194	279163	SPBC215.13	SPAC750.08c	SPBC215.13	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.87538067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777787	2540669	2542549	277194	279006	SPBC215.13	SPAC19A8.11c	SPBC215.13	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.987901896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777788	2540669	2539354	277194	275920	SPBC215.13	SPCC4F11.03c	SPBC215.13	SPCC4F11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391867244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777789	2540669	2539239	277194	275809	SPBC215.13	SPCC1020.10	SPBC215.13	oca2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864274528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777790	2540711	2540320	277234	276850	SPBC215.12	SPBC3D6.04c	cwf10	mad1	snu114|spef2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383141558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777791	2540248	2542895	276780	279339	SPBC336.03	SPAC13G6.10c	efc25	asl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.095070297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777792	2540248	2539584	276780	276143	SPBC336.03	SPCC63.03	efc25	SPCC63.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149218575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777793	2540248	2542701	276780	279154	SPBC336.03	SPAC26H5.05	efc25	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388566538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777794	2540248	2541013	276780	277528	SPBC336.03	SPBC3H7.13	efc25	far10	-	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319382787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777795	2540248	2539970	276780	276514	SPBC336.03	SPBC1773.01	efc25	far8	-	SPBC1773.01|csc3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.620454913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777796	2540248	2543681	276780	280095	SPBC336.03	SPAC9.02c	efc25	SPAC9.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.919292553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777797	2540248	2539064	276780	275636	SPBC336.03	SPCC126.06	efc25	twf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.326981727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777798	2540248	2540425	276780	276953	SPBC336.03	SPBC27.06c	efc25	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.177902274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777799	2540248	2541021	276780	277536	SPBC336.03	SPBC3B8.10c	efc25	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.832044561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777800	2540248	2539310	276780	275877	SPBC336.03	SPCC285.17	efc25	spp27	-	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778250746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777801	2540248	2539467	276780	276030	SPBC336.03	SPCC417.07c	efc25	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.623495285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777802	2540248	2541264	276780	277778	SPBC336.03	SPBC902.06	efc25	mto2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.328446081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777803	2540248	2542123	276780	278599	SPBC336.03	SPAC18G6.15	efc25	mal3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.951794504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777804	2540248	2543412	276780	279834	SPBC336.03	SPAC637.07	efc25	moe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.212421297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777805	2540248	2541889	276780	278379	SPBC336.03	SPAC2F7.03c	efc25	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.094430728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777806	2540248	2542168	276780	278643	SPBC336.03	SPAC17A5.16	efc25	ftp105	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.393936932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777807	2540248	2542428	276780	278890	SPBC336.03	SPAC1805.12c	efc25	uep1	-	ubi2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.314108875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777808	2540248	2539857	276780	276404	SPBC336.03	SPBC1604.20c	efc25	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.447955033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777809	2540248	2540201	276780	276734	SPBC336.03	SPBC13A2.04c	efc25	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572659268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777810	2540248	2541786	276780	278278	SPBC336.03	SPAC22F3.08c	efc25	rok1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320712737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777811	2540248	2541909	276780	278399	SPBC336.03	SPAC227.01c	efc25	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.601703042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777812	2540248	2540800	276780	277319	SPBC336.03	SPBC409.20c	efc25	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.334366659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777813	2540248	2540677	276780	277202	SPBC336.03	SPBC21B10.03c	efc25	ath1	-	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.520678003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777814	2540248	2541743	276780	278237	SPBC336.03	SPAC22H10.13	efc25	zym1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818970691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777815	2540248	2543044	276780	279479	SPBC336.03	SPAC3C7.12	efc25	tip1	-	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.130151971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777816	2540248	2543516	276780	279934	SPBC336.03	SPAC4F10.11	efc25	spn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.073278771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777817	2540248	2539205	276780	275775	SPBC336.03	SPCC4B3.15	efc25	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.929271578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777818	2540248	2543384	276780	279806	SPBC336.03	SPAC637.06	efc25	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443095157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777819	2540248	2541806	276780	278297	SPBC336.03	SPAC4G8.13c	efc25	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507524551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777820	2540248	2543327	276780	279750	SPBC336.03	SPAC1D4.06c	efc25	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323438214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777821	2540248	2542175	276780	278650	SPBC336.03	SPAC1F3.02c	efc25	mkh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443993304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777822	2540248	2540383	276780	276912	SPBC336.03	SPBC31E1.02c	efc25	pmr1	-	cps5|pgak2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.489855067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777823	2541422	2539050	277928	275623	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC11E10.08	cph2	rik1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.408854392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777824	2541422	2539147	277928	275719	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC622.12c	cph2	gdh1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.503017401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777825	2541422	2543497	277928	279916	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC926.09c	cph2	fas1	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87569424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777826	2541422	2539584	277928	276143	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC63.03	cph2	SPCC63.03	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778338369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777827	2541422	2538961	277928	275535	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC285.14	cph2	trs130	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.359482715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777828	2541422	2540105	277928	276642	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC106.04	cph2	ada1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.083366289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777829	2541422	2543617	277928	280031	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC4A8.10	cph2	SPAC4A8.10	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.19050954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777830	2541422	2542598	277928	279052	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC6G10.08	cph2	idp1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.990627252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777831	2541422	2540885	277928	277402	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC660.14	cph2	mik1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.167800122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777832	2541422	2542518	277928	278976	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC1B3.16c	cph2	vht1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.311497801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777833	2541422	2541343	277928	277854	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBPB2B2.19c	cph2	SPBPB2B2.19c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.055501248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777834	2541422	2542143	277928	278619	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC17C9.07	cph2	alg8	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.14461305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777835	2541422	2541512	277928	278013	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC11E3.08c	cph2	nse6	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.260882179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777836	2541422	2539492	277928	276055	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCPB16A4.06c	cph2	SPCPB16A4.06c	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193502194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777837	2541422	2543152	277928	279584	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC869.03c	cph2	SPAC869.03c	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.928869832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777838	2541422	2540026	277928	276570	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC16D10.08c	cph2	hsp104	rco1	SPBC16D10.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.87337082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777839	2541422	2542713	277928	279166	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC29B12.12	cph2	SPAC29B12.12	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86466695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777840	2541422	2541818	277928	278309	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC11G7.02	cph2	pub1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.562640012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777841	2541422	2543064	277928	279497	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC3G6.01	cph2	hrp3	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.814125145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777842	2541422	2542671	277928	279124	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC824.09c	cph2	SPAC824.09c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321241829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777843	2541422	2539855	277928	276403	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC14F5.07	cph2	doa10	rco1	ssm4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385439282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777844	2541422	2539156	277928	275728	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC1450.08c	cph2	wtf16	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.697537383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777845	2541422	2539582	277928	276141	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC594.07c	cph2	bqt3	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.960056513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777846	2541422	2540524	277928	277052	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC21B10.08c	cph2	SPBC21B10.08c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.49753002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777847	2541422	2542358	277928	278823	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC1782.09c	cph2	clp1	rco1	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.142536091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777848	2541422	2542378	277928	278842	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC1805.04	cph2	nup132	rco1	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321804074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777849	2541422	2540995	277928	277511	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC337.16	cph2	cho1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.991272307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777850	2541422	2540528	277928	277056	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC18H10.04c	cph2	sce3	rco1	tif48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.673648387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777851	2541422	2539035	277928	275608	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC794.09c	cph2	tef101	rco1	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.135599348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777852	2541422	2541621	277928	278118	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC29A4.17c	cph2	SPAC29A4.17c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386590645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777853	2541422	2543578	277928	279993	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC9.10	cph2	thi9	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389788405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777854	2541422	2542237	277928	278709	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC19E9.02	cph2	fin1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.048700902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777855	2541422	2539930	277928	276474	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC1198.11c	cph2	reb1	rco1	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328814726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777856	2541422	3361119	277928	280195	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC663.07c	cph2	SPCC663.07c	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097768236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777857	2541422	3361561	277928	280637	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC11E3.01c	cph2	swr1	rco1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.433355613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777858	2541422	2541130	277928	277645	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC776.11	cph2	rpl2801	rco1	rpl28-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.680160201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777859	2541422	2541585	277928	278082	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC14C4.05c	cph2	man1	rco1	heh2|mug61	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.878286682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777860	2541422	2541853	277928	278344	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC2F3.11	cph2	SPAC2F3.11	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.501694587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777861	2541422	2540161	277928	276696	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC13E7.03c	cph2	SPBC13E7.03c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.746236878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777862	2541422	2539196	277928	275767	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC1795.03	cph2	gms1	rco1	gmn3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.129327988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777863	2541422	2541633	277928	278129	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC664.01c	cph2	swi6	rco1	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.951900244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777864	2541422	2540347	277928	276876	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC30B4.08	cph2	eri1	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.61063043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777865	2541422	2541733	277928	278227	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC27F1.03c	cph2	uch1	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.173751209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777866	2541422	2540694	277928	277218	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC19C7.10	cph2	bqt4	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.649390971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777867	2541422	2540402	277928	276930	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC30D10.05c	cph2	SPBC30D10.05c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.839783938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777868	2541422	2543434	277928	279854	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC8F11.02c	cph2	dph3	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.136411037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777869	2541422	5802945	277928	858083	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC19G12.16c	cph2	adg2	rco1	SPAC23A1.01c|mug46	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.702825212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777870	2541422	2540686	277928	277211	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC21D10.10	cph2	bdc1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638866725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777871	2541422	2538922	277928	275499	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC16C4.10	cph2	SPCC16C4.10	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.19316122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777872	2541422	2542103	277928	278579	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC31G5.11	cph2	pac2	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.203226309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777873	2541422	2541098	277928	277613	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC577.13	cph2	syj2	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194436131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777874	2541422	2542345	277928	278811	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC1705.02	cph2	SPAC1705.02	rco1	SPAC1F2.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.409650755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777875	2541422	2540491	277928	277019	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC28E12.04	cph2	SPBC28E12.04	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.773551927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777876	2541422	2540664	277928	277189	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC215.02	cph2	bob1	rco1	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.702347444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777877	2541422	2538806	277928	275387	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC1840.09	cph2	SPCC1840.09	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.263595464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777878	2541422	2539208	277928	275778	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC1450.11c	cph2	cek1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703070991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777879	2541422	2539451	277928	276014	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC63.13	cph2	SPCC63.13	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.255405274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777880	2541422	2542035	277928	278517	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAP8A3.04c	cph2	hsp9	rco1	scf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504207976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777881	2541422	2539226	277928	275796	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC16C4.20c	cph2	SPCC16C4.20c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.087332474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777882	2541422	2539420	277928	275985	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC970.07c	cph2	raf2	rco1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.044393861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777883	2541422	2541200	277928	277714	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC8D2.03c	cph2	hhf2	rco1	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.810997542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777884	2541422	2541408	277928	277916	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBPB2B2.14c	cph2	SPBPB2B2.14c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.54889947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777885	2541422	2542677	277928	279130	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC26F1.10c	cph2	pyp1	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.516744759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777886	2541422	2540979	277928	277495	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC3H7.10	cph2	elp6	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.909983304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777887	2541422	2541313	277928	277825	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBP26C9.02c	cph2	car1	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042256499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777888	2541422	2538847	277928	275428	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC594.06c	cph2	SPCC594.06c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.759798844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777889	2541422	2541994	277928	278478	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC26A3.14c	cph2	SPAC26A3.14c	rco1	SPAC23A6.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323160488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777890	2541422	2541682	277928	278178	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC15F9.02	cph2	seh1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.051709362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777891	2541422	2539564	277928	276125	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC550.12	cph2	arp6	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.33811176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777892	2541422	2539463	277928	276026	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC550.11	cph2	SPCC550.11	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.800175835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777893	2541422	2539235	277928	275805	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC1682.15	cph2	mug122	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.007526917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777894	2541422	2542689	277928	279142	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC29B12.04	cph2	snz1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.959650269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777895	2541422	2539249	277928	275819	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC1450.05c	cph2	rox3	rco1	med19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808844923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777896	2541422	2539472	277928	276035	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC794.03	cph2	SPCC794.03	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.062163788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777897	2541422	2540945	277928	277461	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC342.06c	cph2	rtt109	rco1	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453120776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777898	2541422	2539576	277928	276136	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC794.01c	cph2	zwf2	rco1	SPCC794.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.566088828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777899	2541422	2543137	277928	279569	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC869.04	cph2	SPAC869.04	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575212747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777900	2541422	2543453	277928	279873	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC3G9.03	cph2	rpl2301	rco1	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.836134276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777901	2541422	2539331	277928	275897	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC24B10.09	cph2	rps1702	rco1	rps17|rps17-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.273645307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777902	2541422	2541026	277928	277541	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC337.09	cph2	erg28	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.978738701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777903	2541422	2542555	277928	279012	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC1952.06c	cph2	SPAC1952.06c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.385182723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777904	2541422	2539575	277928	276135	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCP20C8.02c	cph2	SPCP20C8.02c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.760687279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777905	2541422	2541558	277928	278057	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC1F7.08	cph2	fio1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450153585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777906	2541422	2541119	277928	277634	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC651.11c	cph2	apm3	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.617705067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777907	2541422	2539937	277928	276481	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC1539.08	cph2	arf6	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.055413945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777908	2541422	2542012	277928	278495	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC23C11.02c	cph2	rps23	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780402013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777909	2541422	2541761	277928	278255	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC7D4.12c	cph2	SPAC7D4.12c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.91601254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777910	2541422	2541530	277928	278030	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC57A10.10c	cph2	sla1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980036496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777911	2541422	2541998	277928	278482	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC23A1.09	cph2	SPAC23A1.09	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.053408723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777912	2541422	2540993	277928	277509	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC342.01c	cph2	alg6	rco1	SPBC3F6.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.039503459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777913	2541422	3361342	277928	280418	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC16D10.07c	cph2	sir2	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321458692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777914	2541422	2542165	277928	278641	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC1782.08c	cph2	rex3	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.439930145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777915	2541422	2541227	277928	277741	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC947.05c	cph2	frp2	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.914900447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777916	2541422	2543586	277928	280001	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC458.04c	cph2	dli1	rco1	dil1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037513417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777917	2541422	2540425	277928	276953	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC27.06c	cph2	mgr2	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.438219245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777918	2541422	2539365	277928	275931	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC24B10.16c	cph2	SPCC24B10.16c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.047636514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777919	2541422	2539441	277928	276004	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCPJ732.02c	cph2	xks1	rco1	SPCPJ732.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.401831041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777920	2541422	2540663	277928	277188	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC56F2.06	cph2	mug147	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.092918305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777921	2541422	2539129	277928	275701	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC338.14	cph2	ado1	rco1	SPCC338.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.910958497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777922	2541422	2543108	277928	279540	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC3A12.13c	cph2	SPAC3A12.13c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.110833023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777923	2541422	2539244	277928	275814	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC1672.06c	cph2	asp1	rco1	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567562012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777924	2541422	2543563	277928	279979	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC664.02c	cph2	arp8	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.290832464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777925	2541422	2538698	277928	275283	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC1442.02	cph2	SPCC1442.02	rco1	SPCC1450.18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.273188938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777926	2541422	2540714	277928	277237	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC19C2.04c	cph2	ubp11	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.003277448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777927	2541422	2543426	277928	279846	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC631.02	cph2	bdf2	rco1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.832264757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777928	2541422	2541905	277928	278395	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC6G9.01c	cph2	SPAC6G9.01c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322871445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777929	2541422	2541416	277928	277923	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBCPT2R1.01c	cph2	SPBCPT2R1.01c	rco1	SPBPB2B2.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.151233952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777930	2541422	2539352	277928	275918	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC188.07	cph2	ccq1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.998744771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777931	2541422	2539100	277928	275672	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC330.12c	cph2	sdh3	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.126318918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777932	2541422	2542230	277928	278703	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC1B3.06c	cph2	SPAC1B3.06c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329833554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777933	2541422	2538906	277928	275483	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC1259.03	cph2	rpa12	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.629088666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777934	2541422	2542981	277928	279419	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC824.02	cph2	bst1	rco1	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.289437907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777935	2541422	2542791	277928	279240	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC167.04	cph2	pam17	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.436932941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777936	2541422	2540825	277928	277343	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC428.08c	cph2	clr4	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.827755672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777937	2541422	2541246	277928	277760	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC8E4.02c	cph2	SPBC8E4.02c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.541160036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777938	2541422	2540964	277928	277480	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC365.16	cph2	SPBC365.16	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.50880312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777939	2541422	2540340	277928	276869	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC2D10.15c	cph2	pth1	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.406575869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777940	2541422	2543651	277928	280065	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC644.11c	cph2	pkp1	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877816074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777941	2541422	2542239	277928	278711	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC18G6.02c	cph2	chp1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.405677414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777942	2541422	2539023	277928	275596	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC594.05c	cph2	spf1	rco1	spp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.083389688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777943	2541422	2542268	277928	278737	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC17A5.07c	cph2	ulp2	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.312257156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777944	2541422	2541339	277928	277850	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBP4G3.02	cph2	pho1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.495706233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777945	2541422	2539098	277928	275670	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC24B10.18	cph2	SPCC24B10.18	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.413712334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777946	2541422	2539467	277928	276030	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC417.07c	cph2	mto1	rco1	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.164626571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777947	2541422	2541885	277928	278375	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC22H10.03c	cph2	kap114	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.326307352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777948	2541422	2542679	277928	279132	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC12B10.07	cph2	acp1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.682543034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777949	2541422	2542695	277928	279148	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC12B10.09	cph2	pet801	rco1	SPAC12B10.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.315865455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777950	2541422	2541664	277928	278160	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC2H10.01	cph2	SPAC2H10.01	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642859265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777951	2541422	2543135	277928	279567	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC869.06c	cph2	SPAC869.06c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979005764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777952	2541422	2539355	277928	275921	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC1840.08c	cph2	pdi5	rco1	SPCC1840.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.135425328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777953	2541422	2540631	277928	277157	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC25B2.10	cph2	SPBC25B2.10	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.806761547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777954	2541422	2542499	277928	278958	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC1F12.04c	cph2	SPAC1F12.04c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.983303679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777955	2541422	2541249	277928	277763	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC947.01	cph2	alf1	rco1	SPBC947.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.354049875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777956	2541422	2538715	277928	275299	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC1223.05c	cph2	rpl3702	rco1	rpl37|rpl37-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318981146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777957	2541422	2541250	277928	277764	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC8D2.17	cph2	gmh4	rco1	SPBC8D2.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.184101118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777958	2541422	2541776	277928	278270	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC23H3.05c	cph2	swd1	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.741637325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777959	2541422	2541264	277928	277778	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC902.06	cph2	mto2	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.139171104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777960	2541422	2541160	277928	277675	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC725.09c	cph2	hob3	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.463181752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777961	2541422	2540338	277928	276867	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC2G2.13c	cph2	dcd1	rco1	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77829108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777962	2541422	2540922	277928	277438	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC36.10	cph2	SPBC36.10	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.198828298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777963	2541422	2538706	277928	275290	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC338.08	cph2	ctp1	rco1	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.870151227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777964	2541422	2540352	277928	276881	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC215.03c	cph2	csn1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.605817156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777965	2541422	2543412	277928	279834	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC637.07	cph2	moe1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.266831201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777966	2541422	2540396	277928	276924	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC31F10.12	cph2	tma20	rco1	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.133426339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777967	2541422	2540673	277928	277198	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC1D7.03	cph2	mug80	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.580396417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777968	2541422	2541192	277928	277706	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC83.17	cph2	SPBC83.17	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504356118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777969	2541422	2540150	277928	276687	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC16E9.14c	cph2	zrg17	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.837433732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777970	2541422	2542971	277928	279410	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC105.02c	cph2	SPAC105.02c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.199965156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777971	2541422	2541735	277928	278229	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC7D4.04	cph2	atg11	rco1	taf1|cvt9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580705631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777972	2541422	2540363	277928	276892	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC2F12.09c	cph2	atf21	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.558256942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777973	2541422	2542659	277928	279112	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC25B8.08	cph2	SPAC25B8.08	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.814712463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777974	2541422	2542168	277928	278643	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC17A5.16	cph2	ftp105	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258820087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777975	2541422	2542989	277928	279427	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC11E3.13c	cph2	gas5	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.690945998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777976	2541422	2539371	277928	275937	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC18B5.06	cph2	dom34	rco1	SPCC18B5.06|erf1|sup45	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.400294298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777977	2541422	2542873	277928	279318	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC9G1.02	cph2	wis4	rco1	wak1|wik1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.629053194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777978	2541422	2542921	277928	279362	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC1093.01	cph2	ppr5	rco1	SPAC12B10.18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.331342272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777979	2541422	2543667	277928	280081	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC4H3.02c	cph2	swc3	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.63931117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777980	2541422	2539603	277928	276161	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC1289.06c	cph2	ppr8	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.155446932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777981	2541422	2541310	277928	277822	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBP18G5.03	cph2	toc1	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.206755298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777982	2541422	2541532	277928	278032	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC2C4.15c	cph2	ubx2	rco1	ucp13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.463493824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777983	2541422	2543643	277928	280057	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC3G9.07c	cph2	hos2	rco1	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.62058166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777984	2541422	2540086	277928	276624	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC16H5.12c	cph2	SPBC16H5.12c	rco1	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.665275565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777985	2541422	2542902	277928	279346	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC144.05	cph2	SPAC144.05	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04322491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777986	2541422	2543250	277928	279678	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC3G9.15c	cph2	fcf2	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.614295237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777987	2541422	2543057	277928	279491	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC694.03	cph2	SPAC694.03	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867022547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777988	2541422	2541710	277928	278205	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC343.11c	cph2	msc1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.045685443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777989	2541422	3361269	277928	280345	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC31A8.01c	cph2	rtn1	rco1	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.161431672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777990	2541422	2542126	277928	278602	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC1B3.05	cph2	not3	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19378434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777991	2541422	2539000	277928	275574	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC1450.06c	cph2	grx3	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.138996956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777992	2541422	2540665	277928	277190	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC83.02c	cph2	rpl4302	rco1	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783564475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777993	2541422	2538873	277928	275452	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC306.11	cph2	SPCC306.11	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.354893062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777994	2541422	2543244	277928	279672	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC6B12.06c	cph2	rrg9	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.234418257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777995	2541422	2542976	277928	279414	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC9E9.09c	cph2	atd1	rco1	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.353672755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777996	2541422	2538982	277928	275556	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC1450.12	cph2	SPCC1450.12	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.020059839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777997	2541422	2539815	277928	276365	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC1105.02c	cph2	lys4	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.024479721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777998	2541422	3361569	277928	280645	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC186.04c	cph2	SPAC186.04c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.953453122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
777999	2541422	2542070	277928	278547	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC29B12.02c	cph2	set2	rco1	kmt3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.031617744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778000	2541422	2540836	277928	277354	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC18H10.19	cph2	vps38	rco1	atg14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.615092537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778001	2541422	2540077	277928	276615	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC17D11.04c	cph2	nto1	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.494662119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778002	2541422	2538841	277928	275422	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC550.03c	cph2	SPCC550.03c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582424221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778003	2541422	2541241	277928	277755	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC887.17	cph2	SPBC887.17	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817353645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778004	2541422	2543357	277928	279779	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC688.12c	cph2	SPAC688.12c	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813052069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778005	2541422	2539324	277928	275890	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC18.04	cph2	pof6	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.557339551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778006	2541422	2542398	277928	278862	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC1805.03c	cph2	trm13	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.870227714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778007	2541422	2540318	277928	276848	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC30B4.04c	cph2	sol1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.915780206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778008	2541422	2542549	277928	279006	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC19A8.11c	cph2	SPAC19A8.11c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.279371409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778009	2541422	2539408	277928	275973	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC576.12c	cph2	mhf2	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.616710125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778010	2541422	2542519	277928	278977	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC19G12.08	cph2	scs7	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.42048623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778011	2541422	2539027	277928	275600	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC1322.08	cph2	srk1	rco1	mkp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.502527576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778012	2541422	2539953	277928	276497	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC1709.11c	cph2	png2	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.819352396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778013	2541422	2542919	277928	279360	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC6C3.08	cph2	nas6	rco1	SPAC6C3.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.959119177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778014	2541422	2543683	277928	280097	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAPB1E7.04c	cph2	SPAPB1E7.04c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.328255742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778015	2541422	2540387	277928	276915	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC24C6.04	cph2	SPBC24C6.04	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.450269054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778016	2541422	2538824	277928	275405	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC1442.14c	cph2	hnt1	rco1	SPCC1442.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.212256763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778017	2541422	2540990	277928	277506	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC36B7.06c	cph2	mug20	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045242914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778018	2541422	2543443	277928	279863	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC3H1.12c	cph2	snt2	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.263036973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778019	2541422	2541389	277928	277900	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBPB2B2.09c	cph2	SPBPB2B2.09c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.127006618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778020	2541422	2541694	277928	278190	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC1071.04c	cph2	spc2	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.872822609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778021	2541422	2543561	277928	279977	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC922.04	cph2	SPAC922.04	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.4412004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778022	2541422	2542125	277928	278601	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAP8A3.03	cph2	SPAP8A3.03	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.81583904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778023	2541422	2542618	277928	279072	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC1952.15c	cph2	rec24	rco1	mug6	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.973090021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778024	2541422	2538708	277928	275292	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC594.01	cph2	SPCC594.01	rco1	SPCC736.16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.956985613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778025	2541422	2541536	277928	278036	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC1071.02	cph2	mms19	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.628574256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778026	2541422	2540201	277928	276734	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC13A2.04c	cph2	ptr2	rco1	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.0347961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778027	2541422	2539402	277928	275967	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC613.03	cph2	SPCC613.03	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.953016713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778028	2541422	2540967	277928	277483	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC36B7.08c	cph2	SPBC36B7.08c	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.814389703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778029	2541422	2541410	277928	277918	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBPB2B2.17c	cph2	SPBPB2B2.17c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.056404681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778030	2541422	2542597	277928	279051	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAP8A3.07c	cph2	SPAP8A3.07c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.386715255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778031	2541422	2539847	277928	276395	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC530.14c	cph2	dsk1	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.184409487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778032	2541422	2542242	277928	278713	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC18G6.04c	cph2	shm2	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.035087415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778033	2541422	2538828	277928	275409	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC1020.05	cph2	SPCC1020.05	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701037471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778034	2541422	2540184	277928	276717	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC106.12c	cph2	SPBC106.12c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.205612354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778035	2541422	2541395	277928	277904	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBP8B7.25	cph2	cyp4	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.766200284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778036	2541422	2542773	277928	279222	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC16.01	cph2	rho2	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.128565638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778037	2541422	2541296	277928	277808	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBP8B7.06	cph2	rpp201	rco1	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.841341913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778038	2541422	2541186	277928	277700	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC725.01	cph2	SPBC725.01	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.327645013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778039	2541422	2540882	277928	277399	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC4F6.08c	cph2	mrpl39	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.499590589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778040	2541422	2538690	277928	275275	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC1393.05	cph2	ers1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387424318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778041	2541422	2538884	277928	275462	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC1393.08	cph2	SPCC1393.08	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.770454746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778042	2541422	2539421	277928	275986	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC794.11c	cph2	ent3	rco1	SPCC794.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573574294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778043	2541422	2542255	277928	278725	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC57A7.08	cph2	pzh1	rco1	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.811620829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778044	2541422	2539993	277928	276537	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC1105.05	cph2	exg1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.381937165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778045	2541422	2541337	277928	277848	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBP35G2.13c	cph2	swc2	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.249228271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778046	2541422	2542329	277928	278795	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC9G1.10c	cph2	SPAC9G1.10c	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262212689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778047	2541422	2539527	277928	276089	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC338.16	cph2	pof3	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.571146222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778048	2541422	2540930	277928	277446	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC354.10	cph2	def1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.22629199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778049	2541422	2539519	277928	276081	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC364.05	cph2	vps3	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509380448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778050	2541422	2542602	277928	279056	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC186.09	cph2	SPAC186.09	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.528685538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778051	2541422	2541742	277928	278236	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC22H10.09	cph2	SPAC22H10.09	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.832953223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778052	2541422	2541793	277928	278284	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC22H10.02	cph2	SPAC22H10.02	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.259653697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778053	2541422	2538848	277928	275429	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC613.12c	cph2	raf1	rco1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.415091321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778054	2541422	3361520	277928	280596	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC1610.02c	cph2	SPAC1610.02c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.118705473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778055	2541422	2541017	277928	277532	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC36.07	cph2	elp1	rco1	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.562107052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778056	2541422	2540946	277928	277462	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC36.04	cph2	cys11	rco1	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.007736235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778057	2541422	2540643	277928	277168	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC19G7.06	cph2	mbx1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.570481145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778058	2541422	2541144	277928	277659	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC685.06	cph2	rps001	rco1	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.151380435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778059	2541422	2541628	277928	278124	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC110.02	cph2	pds5	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.908783876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778060	2541422	2539595	277928	276153	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC965.14c	cph2	SPCC965.14c	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814121137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778061	2541422	2542875	277928	279320	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC13G7.02c	cph2	ssa1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.068896675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778062	2541422	2542725	277928	279176	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC3A12.10	cph2	rpl2001	rco1	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704038291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778063	2541422	2540821	277928	277339	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC800.03	cph2	clr3	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.058920951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778064	2541422	2539538	277928	276100	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC364.06	cph2	nap1	rco1	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.09339095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778065	2541422	2539877	277928	276423	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC16G5.07c	cph2	SPBC16G5.07c	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865791494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778066	2541422	2539908	277928	276454	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC13E7.06	cph2	msd1	rco1	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.945954455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778067	2541422	2539763	277928	276314	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC1861.05	cph2	SPBC1861.05	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.19027375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778068	2541422	2540001	277928	276545	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC1289.13c	cph2	gmh6	rco1	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.925460091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778069	2541422	2542170	277928	278645	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC17G8.13c	cph2	mst2	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.415275254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778070	2541422	2540910	277928	277426	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC577.02	cph2	rpl3801	rco1	rpl38-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.196246091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778071	2541422	2542806	277928	279254	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC1610.01	cph2	saf5	rco1	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.329501351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778072	2541422	2538907	277928	275484	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC24B10.19c	cph2	nts1	rco1	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.988271334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778073	2541422	2539160	277928	275732	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC18.17c	cph2	SPCC18.17c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.142008464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778074	2541422	2541156	277928	277671	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC685.07c	cph2	rpl2701	rco1	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.710369113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778075	2541422	2542759	277928	279209	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC9G1.07	cph2	SPAC9G1.07	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932934615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778076	2541422	2539499	277928	276062	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC622.08c	cph2	hta1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.074958557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778077	2541422	2538762	277928	275345	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC306.04c	cph2	set1	rco1	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.48532212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778078	2541422	2539555	277928	276116	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC4B3.08	cph2	lsg1	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.230617632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778079	2541422	2540849	277928	277366	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC428.11	cph2	met17	rco1	SPBC428.11|cys2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.328849797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778080	2541422	2543106	277928	279538	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC3A11.13	cph2	SPAC3A11.13	rco1	SPAC3H5.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321775652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778081	2541422	2539137	277928	275709	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC1682.08c	cph2	mcp2	rco1	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.047797646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778082	2541422	2540498	277928	277026	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC27.02c	cph2	ask1	rco1	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.500812957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778083	2541422	2542881	277928	279326	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC13F5.03c	cph2	gld1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.980279539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778084	2541422	2539600	277928	276158	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCP1E11.03	cph2	mug170	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.20338121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778085	2541422	2540152	277928	276688	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC12C2.03c	cph2	SPBC12C2.03c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.908888814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778086	2541422	2543304	277928	279728	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC6B12.12	cph2	tom70	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.42091735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778087	2541422	2538717	277928	275301	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC1235.02	cph2	bio2	rco1	SPCC320.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.217665517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778088	2541422	2539159	277928	275731	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC1235.01	cph2	SPCC1235.01	rco1	SPCC320.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.478939587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778089	2541422	2542113	277928	278589	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC1B3.11c	cph2	ypt4	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.509782497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778090	2541422	2540998	277928	277514	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC3D6.05	cph2	ptp4	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.18910361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778091	2541422	2543136	277928	279568	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC1348.07	cph2	SPBC1348.07	rco1	SPAC1348.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143912241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778092	2541422	2540531	277928	277059	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC23E6.08	cph2	sat1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.541257823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778093	2541422	2542294	277928	278762	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC1805.09c	cph2	fmt1	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152507749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778094	2541422	2539614	277928	276172	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC17D11.08	cph2	SPBC17D11.08	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148530479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778095	2541422	2543130	277928	279562	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC869.05c	cph2	SPAC869.05c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.386385102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778096	2541422	2538714	277928	275298	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC330.11	cph2	btb1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44188492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778097	2541422	2541100	277928	277615	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC651.04	cph2	SPBC651.04	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64633294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778098	2541422	2540089	277928	276627	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC32H8.01c	cph2	SPBC32H8.01c	rco1	SPBP22H7.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988245046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778099	2541422	2541425	277928	277930	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC2C4.17c	cph2	msy2	rco1	SPAC2C4.17c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446828013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778100	2541422	2539816	277928	276366	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC12C2.04	cph2	SPBC12C2.04	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57284877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778101	2541422	2540346	277928	276875	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC2F12.03c	cph2	ebs1	rco1	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322764814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778102	2541422	2540654	277928	277179	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC19F5.01c	cph2	puc1	rco1	SPBP8B7.32c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153473709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778103	2541422	2539013	277928	275586	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC364.03	cph2	rpl1702	rco1	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.506101136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778104	2541422	2540829	277928	277347	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC800.09	cph2	sum2	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.040470804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778105	2541422	2540325	277928	276855	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC21B10.10	cph2	rps402	rco1	rps4-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.512194767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778106	2541422	2542418	277928	278881	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC1805.07c	cph2	dad2	rco1	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.402418619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778107	2541422	2538916	277928	275493	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC16C4.17	cph2	mug123	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.839846425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778108	2541422	2540345	277928	276874	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC19C7.09c	cph2	uve1	rco1	uvde	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.341429491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778109	2541422	2540677	277928	277202	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC21B10.03c	cph2	ath1	rco1	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.492825067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778110	2541422	2539772	277928	276323	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC1734.05c	cph2	spf31	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036060096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778111	2541422	2539722	277928	276275	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC14F5.11c	cph2	mug186	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.45546197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778112	2541422	2542222	277928	278695	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC31G5.18c	cph2	sde2	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.711865749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778113	2541422	2543437	277928	279857	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAPB1A10.14	cph2	pof15	rco1	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.333747898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778114	2541422	2543427	277928	279847	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAPB1A10.15	cph2	arv1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.221895719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778115	2541422	2539668	277928	276223	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC11B10.10c	cph2	pht1	rco1	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.719375781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778116	2541422	2541380	277928	277891	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBPB2B2.13	cph2	gal1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.191941455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778117	2541422	2543602	277928	280017	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAPB1A11.04c	cph2	mca1	rco1	SPAPB1A11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.166038614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778118	2541422	2540516	277928	277044	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC21C3.01c	cph2	vps13a	rco1	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.141837651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778119	2541422	2543183	277928	279612	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC3A12.06c	cph2	SPAC3A12.06c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770030121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778120	2541422	2540920	277928	277436	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC342.03	cph2	gas4	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.61028043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778121	2541422	2541744	277928	278238	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC23A1.02c	cph2	SPAC23A1.02c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640667131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778122	2541422	2538787	277928	275368	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC364.02c	cph2	bis1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.19046131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778123	2541422	2539928	277928	276472	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC1604.08c	cph2	imp1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.200879232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778124	2541422	2539736	277928	276288	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC12C2.12c	cph2	glo1	rco1	SPBC21D10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.87873072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778125	2541422	2541637	277928	278133	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC57A10.04	cph2	mug10	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452584604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778126	2541422	2539170	277928	275741	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC306.02c	cph2	SPCC306.02c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.133829546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778127	2541422	2539205	277928	275775	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC4B3.15	cph2	mid1	rco1	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.322539934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778128	2541422	2540563	277928	277090	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC25H2.09	cph2	SPBC25H2.09	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980223014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778129	2541422	2539920	277928	276464	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC119.08	cph2	pmk1	rco1	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.882311977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778130	2541422	2539375	277928	275941	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC4G3.11	cph2	mug154	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.369656868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778131	2541422	2540551	277928	277078	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC23E6.01c	cph2	cxr1	rco1	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.340876785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778132	2541422	2538840	277928	275421	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC736.07c	cph2	SPCC736.07c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449908876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778133	2541422	2539189	277928	275760	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC1682.16	cph2	rpt4	rco1	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.706027002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778134	2541422	2541941	277928	278428	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC20H4.03c	cph2	tfs1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.011097697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778135	2541422	2543337	277928	279760	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC959.08	cph2	rpl2102	rco1	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.323373301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778136	2541422	2539253	277928	275823	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC1827.03c	cph2	SPCC1827.03c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780941854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778137	2541422	3361410	277928	280486	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC1527.01	cph2	mok11	rco1	SPAC23D3.15	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.685887193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778138	2541422	2539169	277928	275740	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC1235.11	cph2	mpc1	rco1	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.487297653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778139	2541422	2538861	277928	275441	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC1620.11	cph2	nup97	rco1	mug87	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.914063913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778140	2541422	2542716	277928	279169	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC25H1.07	cph2	emc1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.366703595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778141	2541422	3361165	277928	280241	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC1348.12	cph2	SPBC1348.12	rco1	SPAC1348.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.35996523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778142	2541422	2539700	277928	276253	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC1685.15c	cph2	klp6	rco1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.449914162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778143	2541422	2539959	277928	276503	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC1703.11	cph2	SPBC1703.11	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.680477931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778144	2541422	2543384	277928	279806	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC637.06	cph2	gmh5	rco1	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.97205133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778145	2541422	2543277	277928	279705	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC1002.03c	cph2	gls2	rco1	gls2alpha	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.557541877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778146	2541422	2541774	277928	278268	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC22E12.05c	cph2	rer1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.83929819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778147	2541422	2543387	277928	279809	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAPB1E7.02c	cph2	mcl1	rco1	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.271315723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778148	2541422	2540070	277928	276608	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC119.04	cph2	mei3	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.336991123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778149	2541422	2538981	277928	275555	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC330.06c	cph2	pmp20	rco1	SPCC330.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.102319618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778150	2541422	2543070	277928	279503	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC2H10.02c	cph2	SPAC2H10.02c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.80321515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778151	2541422	2540558	277928	277085	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC2D10.17	cph2	clr1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.370047485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778152	2541422	2539583	277928	276142	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC777.04	cph2	SPCC777.04	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380922739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778153	2541422	2542424	277928	278886	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC1805.14	cph2	SPAC1805.14	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.503037097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778154	2541422	2541050	277928	277565	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC428.05c	cph2	arg12	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865482541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778155	2541422	2539085	277928	275657	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC285.15c	cph2	rps2802	rco1	rps28|rps28-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.198519635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778156	2541422	2542700	277928	279153	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC26H5.08c	cph2	bgl2	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.984352291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778157	2541422	2543372	277928	279794	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAPB1A10.09	cph2	ase1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.279862785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778158	2541422	2538947	277928	275521	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC1682.12c	cph2	ubp16	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869420381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778159	2541422	2543090	277928	279523	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC1348.01	cph2	SPBC1348.01	rco1	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.611067219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778160	2541422	2542656	277928	279110	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC2E1P3.05c	cph2	SPAC2E1P3.05c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.907196668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778161	2541422	2540309	277928	276839	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC21B10.13c	cph2	yox1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773888181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778162	2541422	2542943	277928	279384	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC1348.03	cph2	SPBC1348.03	rco1	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.161994986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778163	2541422	2543472	277928	279892	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC959.04c	cph2	omh6	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.261137816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778164	2541422	2541297	277928	277809	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC9B6.07	cph2	nop52	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.937918861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778165	2541422	2540320	277928	276850	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC3D6.04c	cph2	mad1	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.50808222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778166	2541422	2542879	277928	279324	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC13G7.07	cph2	arb2	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513255795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778167	2541422	2539001	277928	275575	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC1494.08c	cph2	SPCC1494.08c	rco1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.631537996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778168	2541422	2542444	277928	278906	SPAC2F7.07c	SPAC17A5.05c	cph2	SPAC17A5.05c	rco1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.144811085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778169	2539136	2542143	275708	278619	SPCC1919.05	SPAC17C9.07	SPCC1919.05	alg8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.386634118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778170	2539136	2540913	275708	277429	SPCC1919.05	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC1919.05	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.48274005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778171	2539136	2540068	275708	276606	SPCC1919.05	SPBC1734.12c	SPCC1919.05	alg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.498266493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778172	2539136	2541438	275708	277943	SPCC1919.05	SPAC23G3.10c	SPCC1919.05	ssr3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981992985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778173	2539136	2538922	275708	275499	SPCC1919.05	SPCC16C4.10	SPCC1919.05	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.163207575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778174	2539136	2541361	275708	277872	SPCC1919.05	SPBP8B7.10c	SPCC1919.05	utp16	-	SPBP8B7.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.940125609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778175	2539136	2539420	275708	275985	SPCC1919.05	SPCC970.07c	SPCC1919.05	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.839771324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778176	2539136	2541208	275708	277722	SPCC1919.05	SPBC887.04c	SPCC1919.05	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.902872721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778177	2539136	2543108	275708	279540	SPCC1919.05	SPAC3A12.13c	SPCC1919.05	SPAC3A12.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.440430586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778178	2539136	2542331	275708	278797	SPCC1919.05	SPAC1834.05	SPCC1919.05	alg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.263551635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778179	2539136	2542239	275708	278711	SPCC1919.05	SPAC18G6.02c	SPCC1919.05	chp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.031007656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778180	2539136	2540797	275708	277316	SPCC1919.05	SPBC18H10.11c	SPCC1919.05	ppr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813228613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778181	2539136	2543593	275708	280008	SPCC1919.05	SPAC4G9.10	SPCC1919.05	arg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383359588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778182	2539136	2538770	275708	275353	SPCC1919.05	SPCC1753.02c	SPCC1919.05	git3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702865154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778183	2539136	2540348	275708	276877	SPCC1919.05	SPBC29A10.05	SPCC1919.05	exo1	-	mut2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.89085059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778184	2539136	2540396	275708	276924	SPCC1919.05	SPBC31F10.12	SPCC1919.05	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.307792543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778185	2539136	2542420	275708	278883	SPCC1919.05	SPAC19D5.03	SPCC1919.05	cid1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.994311962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778186	2539136	2542660	275708	279113	SPCC1919.05	SPAC328.03	SPCC1919.05	tps1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.249322598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778187	2539136	2539371	275708	275937	SPCC1919.05	SPCC18B5.06	SPCC1919.05	dom34	-	SPCC18B5.06|erf1|sup45	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.090623596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778188	2539136	2542235	275708	278707	SPCC1919.05	SPAC18G6.05c	SPCC1919.05	SPAC18G6.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0621028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778189	2539136	2541496	275708	277998	SPCC1919.05	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC1919.05	arp42	-	arp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.902620092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778190	2539136	2543245	275708	279673	SPCC1919.05	SPAC56F8.06c	SPCC1919.05	alg10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.189478035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778191	2539136	2543643	275708	280057	SPCC1919.05	SPAC3G9.07c	SPCC1919.05	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.952964826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778192	2539136	2541824	275708	278315	SPCC1919.05	SPAC27E2.02	SPCC1919.05	SPAC27E2.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714475799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778193	2539136	2540430	275708	276958	SPCC1919.05	SPBC25B2.01	SPCC1919.05	SPBC25B2.01	-	SPBC2G5.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.368318844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778194	2539136	2540751	275708	277273	SPCC1919.05	SPBC20F10.10	SPCC1919.05	psl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.484211946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778195	2539136	2542439	275708	278901	SPCC1919.05	SPAC17A5.08	SPCC1919.05	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.833338332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778196	2539136	2540342	275708	276871	SPCC1919.05	SPBC2G2.01c	SPCC1919.05	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.839402177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778197	2539136	2541053	275708	277568	SPCC1919.05	SPBC56F2.10c	SPCC1919.05	alg5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.011505084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778198	2539136	2541614	275708	278111	SPCC1919.05	SPAC29A4.20	SPCC1919.05	elp3	-	kat9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.46751819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778199	2539136	2540229	275708	276761	SPCC1919.05	SPBC31F10.15c	SPCC1919.05	atp15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986808482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778200	2539136	2539812	275708	276362	SPCC1919.05	SPBC1347.02	SPCC1919.05	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.673561734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778201	2539136	2539527	275708	276089	SPCC1919.05	SPCC338.16	SPCC1919.05	pof3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808856281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778202	2539136	2541713	275708	278208	SPCC1919.05	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC1919.05	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989960453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778203	2539136	2543391	275708	279813	SPCC1919.05	SPAC4G9.09c	SPCC1919.05	arg11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.498980906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778204	2539136	2543628	275708	280042	SPCC1919.05	SPAC3H8.10	SPCC1919.05	spo20	-	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.472713908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778205	2539136	2543567	275708	279983	SPCC1919.05	SPAC890.03	SPCC1919.05	ppk16	-	mug92	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.940054758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778206	2539136	2540657	275708	277182	SPCC1919.05	SPBC1E8.02	SPCC1919.05	SPBC1E8.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704834466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778207	2539136	2540829	275708	277347	SPCC1919.05	SPBC800.09	SPCC1919.05	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.813468632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778208	2539136	2543602	275708	280017	SPCC1919.05	SPAPB1A11.04c	SPCC1919.05	mca1	-	SPAPB1A11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.701171644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778209	2539136	2543472	275708	279892	SPCC1919.05	SPAC959.04c	SPCC1919.05	omh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.631358706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778210	2539820	2540131	276370	276668	SPBC1709.13c	SPBC1778.05c	set10	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.899478338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778211	2539820	2539845	276370	276393	SPBC1709.13c	SPBC12C2.02c	set10	ste20	-	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.286085024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778212	2539820	2541900	276370	278390	SPBC1709.13c	SPAC23H4.17c	set10	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.399732402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778213	2539820	2540967	276370	277483	SPBC1709.13c	SPBC36B7.08c	set10	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.820297655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778214	2539820	2543628	276370	280042	SPBC1709.13c	SPAC3H8.10	set10	spo20	-	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189830324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778215	2539820	2540829	276370	277347	SPBC1709.13c	SPBC800.09	set10	sum2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.94353168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778216	2543551	2540060	279968	276598	SPAC4G8.06c	SPBC106.01	trm12	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.24531842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778217	2543551	2538922	279968	275499	SPAC4G8.06c	SPCC16C4.10	trm12	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.840588946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778218	2543551	2542469	279968	278930	SPAC4G8.06c	SPAC19A8.04	trm12	erg5	-	cyp61	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.518052661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778219	2543551	2541496	279968	277998	SPAC4G8.06c	SPAC23D3.09	trm12	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.26393668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778220	2543551	2542549	279968	279006	SPAC4G8.06c	SPAC19A8.11c	trm12	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.338883723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778221	2543551	2540910	279968	277426	SPAC4G8.06c	SPBC577.02	trm12	rpl3801	-	rpl38-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.11923697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778222	2543551	2538762	279968	275345	SPAC4G8.06c	SPCC306.04c	trm12	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.904440004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778223	2543551	2542767	279968	279217	SPAC4G8.06c	SPAC1565.07c	trm12	knd1	-	SPAC1565.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.74718422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778224	2543551	2543304	279968	279728	SPAC4G8.06c	SPAC6B12.12	trm12	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.619180489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778225	2543551	2540936	279968	277452	SPAC4G8.06c	SPBC800.05c	trm12	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.329165042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778226	2543551	2540558	279968	277085	SPAC4G8.06c	SPBC2D10.17	trm12	clr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.355505214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778227	2538922	2541204	275499	277718	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC839.06	SPCC16C4.10	cta3	-	SPBC24E9.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984309356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778228	2538922	2543317	275499	279741	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC823.14	SPCC16C4.10	ptf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.923311938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778229	2538922	2543617	275499	280031	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC4A8.10	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC4A8.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852735482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778230	2538922	2541971	275499	278456	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC27F1.05c	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC27F1.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.199884623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778231	2538922	2541512	275499	278013	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC11E3.08c	SPCC16C4.10	nse6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041043374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778232	2538922	2540913	275499	277429	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.006628404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778233	2538922	2541426	275499	277931	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC227.06	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC227.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.41517195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778234	2538922	2540435	275499	276963	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC25B2.03	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC25B2.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.722714528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778235	2538922	2540026	275499	276570	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC16D10.08c	SPCC16C4.10	hsp104	-	SPBC16D10.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985782597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778236	2538922	2543064	275499	279497	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC3G6.01	SPCC16C4.10	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.594718511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778237	2538922	2540131	275499	276668	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC1778.05c	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449743768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778238	2538922	2542197	275499	278672	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC1142.01	SPCC16C4.10	rqc1	-	SPAC1142.01|SPAC17G6.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767608825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778239	2538922	2541552	275499	278051	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC1142.08	SPCC16C4.10	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.305434972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778240	2538922	2542358	275499	278823	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC16C4.10	clp1	-	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.744890766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778241	2538922	2543339	275499	279762	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC630.13c	SPCC16C4.10	tsc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.428146843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778242	2538922	2542953	275499	279393	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC1006.06	SPCC16C4.10	rgf2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924176902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778243	2538922	2541117	275499	277632	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC646.13	SPCC16C4.10	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.433031383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778244	2538922	2543432	275499	279852	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC4G8.05	SPCC16C4.10	ppk14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.5792329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778245	2538922	2543652	275499	280066	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC4H3.03c	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC4H3.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810311622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778246	2538922	2540686	275499	277211	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC16C4.10	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.857427729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778247	2538922	2542743	275499	279193	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC6F6.04c	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC6F6.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771800808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778248	2538922	2541457	275499	277960	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC6G10.10c	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC6G10.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.427618024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778249	2538922	2543320	275499	279744	SPCC16C4.10	SPAPJ695.01c	SPCC16C4.10	SPAPJ695.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.227077391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778250	2538922	2543661	275499	280075	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC644.08	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC644.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.4412236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778251	2538922	2542677	275499	279130	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC16C4.10	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.075030437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778252	2538922	2540979	275499	277495	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC3H7.10	SPCC16C4.10	elp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.751461792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778253	2538922	2539970	275499	276514	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC1773.01	SPCC16C4.10	far8	-	SPBC1773.01|csc3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.195271824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778254	2538922	2542816	275499	279263	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC4G8.11c	SPCC16C4.10	atp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386130609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778255	2538922	2541994	275499	278478	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC26A3.14c	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC26A3.14c	-	SPAC23A6.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570309617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778256	2538922	2542714	275499	279167	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC5H10.06c	SPCC16C4.10	adh4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98007282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778257	2538922	2540692	275499	277217	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC800.07c	SPCC16C4.10	tsf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.946922165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778258	2538922	2540220	275499	276753	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC337.03	SPCC16C4.10	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.310631352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778259	2538922	2539117	275499	275689	SPCC16C4.10	SPCC74.06	SPCC16C4.10	mak3	-	phk2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.740195193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778260	2538922	2539063	275499	275635	SPCC16C4.10	SPCC126.12	SPCC16C4.10	SPCC126.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319754605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778261	2538922	2542318	275499	278784	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC16C4.10	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.901933962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778262	2538922	2541560	275499	278059	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC24B11.12c	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC24B11.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05031493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778263	2538922	2543551	275499	279968	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC4G8.06c	SPCC16C4.10	trm12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.840588946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778264	2538922	2538698	275499	275283	SPCC16C4.10	SPCC1442.02	SPCC16C4.10	SPCC1442.02	-	SPCC1450.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.010156828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778265	2538922	2540893	275499	277409	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC543.10	SPCC16C4.10	get1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.907516542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778266	2538922	2539310	275499	275877	SPCC16C4.10	SPCC285.17	SPCC16C4.10	spp27	-	uaf30	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.762393976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778267	2538922	2540222	275499	276755	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC32F12.03c	SPCC16C4.10	gpx1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.250406974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778268	2538922	2539467	275499	276030	SPCC16C4.10	SPCC417.07c	SPCC16C4.10	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.25779784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778269	2538922	2543349	275499	279771	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC977.02	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC977.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869815815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778270	2538922	2542950	275499	279390	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC12B10.03	SPCC16C4.10	bun62	-	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635671377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778271	2538922	2543430	275499	279850	SPCC16C4.10	SPAPB1A10.12c	SPCC16C4.10	alo1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.195527732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778272	2538922	2540797	275499	277316	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC18H10.11c	SPCC16C4.10	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.205390556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778273	2538922	2541800	275499	278291	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC732.02c	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC732.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.018919935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778274	2538922	2541776	275499	278270	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC23H3.05c	SPCC16C4.10	swd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.810372676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778275	2538922	2541093	275499	277608	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC646.08c	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC646.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.020725389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778276	2538922	2543144	275499	279576	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC3F10.05c	SPCC16C4.10	mug113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.3794196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778277	2538922	2540647	275499	277172	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC18H10.07	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC18H10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258226131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778278	2538922	2540041	275499	276580	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC1198.03c	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC1198.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444344874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778279	2538922	2542652	275499	279106	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC1687.15	SPCC16C4.10	gsk3	-	skp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.966394404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778280	2538922	3361491	275499	280567	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC1805.08	SPCC16C4.10	dlc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.362645314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778281	2538922	2540546	275499	277073	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC25B2.06c	SPCC16C4.10	btb2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.921777365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778282	2538922	2541543	275499	278043	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC5H10.04	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC5H10.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.518157767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778283	2538922	2540352	275499	276881	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC215.03c	SPCC16C4.10	csn1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.296718994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778284	2538922	2540150	275499	276687	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC16E9.14c	SPCC16C4.10	zrg17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.922015817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778285	2538922	2542160	275499	278636	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC8C9.11	SPCC16C4.10	fra2	-	SPAC8C9.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.772727913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778286	2538922	2542168	275499	278643	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC17A5.16	SPCC16C4.10	ftp105	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.314776764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778287	2538922	2543313	275499	279737	SPCC16C4.10	SPAPJ691.03	SPCC16C4.10	SPAPJ691.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.97482059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778288	2538922	2541096	275499	277611	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC725.10	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC725.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.873911702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778289	2538922	2539603	275499	276161	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC1289.06c	SPCC16C4.10	ppr8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.464437579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778290	2538922	2540452	275499	276980	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC2A9.11c	SPCC16C4.10	iss9	-	SPBC2A9.11c|SPBC2D10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.936716029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778291	2538922	2543643	275499	280057	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC3G9.07c	SPCC16C4.10	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639324074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778292	2538922	2541899	275499	278389	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC22E12.11c	SPCC16C4.10	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.97701363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778293	2538922	2540086	275499	276624	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC16H5.12c	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.610735789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778294	2538922	2542013	275499	278496	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC20H4.11c	SPCC16C4.10	rho5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383521596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778295	2538922	2540326	275499	276856	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC2G5.06c	SPCC16C4.10	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.061928747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778296	2538922	2541187	275499	277701	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC776.14	SPCC16C4.10	plh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038775849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778297	2538922	2538769	275499	275352	SPCC16C4.10	SPCC126.04c	SPCC16C4.10	sgf73	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041505969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778298	2538922	2539667	275499	276222	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC13G1.08c	SPCC16C4.10	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.561235471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778299	2538922	3361269	275499	280345	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC31A8.01c	SPCC16C4.10	rtn1	-	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205649578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778300	2538922	2538945	275499	275519	SPCC16C4.10	SPCC1739.06c	SPCC16C4.10	SPCC1739.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.14966693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778301	2538922	2542946	275499	279386	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC6F12.03c	SPCC16C4.10	fsv1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.717302129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778302	2538922	2543178	275499	279608	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC31G5.15	SPCC16C4.10	psd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317155477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778303	2538922	2539217	275499	275787	SPCC16C4.10	SPCC1223.03c	SPCC16C4.10	gut2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.984629791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778304	2538922	2541542	275499	278042	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC4G9.02	SPCC16C4.10	rnh201	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.294072155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778305	2538922	2539524	275499	276086	SPCC16C4.10	SPCC70.02c	SPCC16C4.10	SPCC70.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511059077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778306	2538922	2539232	275499	275802	SPCC16C4.10	SPCC1223.04c	SPCC16C4.10	set11	-	mug76	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.588261918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778307	2538922	2541900	275499	278390	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC16C4.10	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.303404445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778308	2538922	2540374	275499	276903	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC31F10.02	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC31F10.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773228288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778309	2538922	2542549	275499	279006	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC19A8.11c	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814772315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778310	2538922	2539953	275499	276497	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC1709.11c	SPCC16C4.10	png2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09009425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778311	2538922	2543080	275499	279513	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC3A11.10c	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC3A11.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.393520512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778312	2538922	2542919	275499	279360	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC6C3.08	SPCC16C4.10	nas6	-	SPAC6C3.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.689434888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778313	2538922	2542439	275499	278901	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC17A5.08	SPCC16C4.10	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.121875398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778314	2538922	2538824	275499	275405	SPCC16C4.10	SPCC1442.14c	SPCC16C4.10	hnt1	-	SPCC1442.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.077766323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778315	2538922	2541041	275499	277556	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC3D6.13c	SPCC16C4.10	pdi3	-	pdi2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.389200777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778316	2538922	2543381	275499	279803	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC630.09c	SPCC16C4.10	mug58	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.411631864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778317	2538922	2541708	275499	278203	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC31A2.02	SPCC16C4.10	trm112	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.442224696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778318	2538922	2540967	275499	277483	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.546299581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778319	2538922	2543059	275499	279493	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC30.04c	SPCC16C4.10	abc4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927822611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778320	2538922	2542597	275499	279051	SPCC16C4.10	SPAP8A3.07c	SPCC16C4.10	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.888637249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778321	2538922	2541266	275499	277780	SPCC16C4.10	SPBP16F5.05c	SPCC16C4.10	yar1	-	SPBP16F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.043166416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778322	2538922	2541186	275499	277700	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC725.01	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC725.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.124874213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778323	2538922	2543331	275499	279754	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC56E4.07	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC56E4.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040378425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778324	2538922	2543350	275499	279772	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC56E4.03	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC56E4.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.988548601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778325	2538922	2542829	275499	279276	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC13D6.02c	SPCC16C4.10	byr3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.769225903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778326	2538922	2540930	275499	277446	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC354.10	SPCC16C4.10	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992782395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778327	2538922	2541742	275499	278236	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC22H10.09	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC22H10.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634562358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778328	2538922	3361520	275499	280596	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC1610.02c	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.389133443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778329	2538922	2541017	275499	277532	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC36.07	SPCC16C4.10	elp1	-	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.532775651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778330	2538922	2540946	275499	277462	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC36.04	SPCC16C4.10	cys11	-	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.25262171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778331	2538922	2540918	275499	277434	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC800.02	SPCC16C4.10	whi5	-	mug54	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.74866273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778332	2538922	2539763	275499	276314	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC1861.05	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC1861.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.343960977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778333	2538922	2539354	275499	275920	SPCC16C4.10	SPCC4F11.03c	SPCC16C4.10	SPCC4F11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844907844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778334	2538922	2540226	275499	276758	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC32H8.08c	SPCC16C4.10	omh5	-	pi016|SPACTOKYO_453.20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.753184123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778335	2538922	2540519	275499	277047	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC21C3.14c	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC21C3.14c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.383487197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778336	2538922	2543670	275499	280084	SPCC16C4.10	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPCC16C4.10	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380862458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778337	2538922	2540800	275499	277319	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC409.20c	SPCC16C4.10	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516451322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778338	2538922	2542385	275499	278849	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC1805.02c	SPCC16C4.10	etf2	-	SPAC1805.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.347079258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778339	2538922	2540152	275499	276688	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC12C2.03c	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC12C2.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097150221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778340	2538922	2543160	275499	279591	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC31A2.14	SPCC16C4.10	bun107	-	wdr48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.875452421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778341	2538922	2540600	275499	277126	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC4.05	SPCC16C4.10	mlo2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.902652553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778342	2538922	2541100	275499	277615	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC651.04	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC651.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639478018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778343	2538922	2543077	275499	279510	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC806.04c	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC806.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.505740593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778344	2538922	2541470	275499	277972	SPCC16C4.10	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPCC16C4.10	rpb9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514811795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778345	2538922	2542731	275499	279181	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC5H10.09c	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC5H10.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.132197205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778346	2538922	2539136	275499	275708	SPCC16C4.10	SPCC1919.05	SPCC16C4.10	SPCC1919.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.163207575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778347	2538922	2539335	275499	275901	SPCC16C4.10	SPCC1450.16c	SPCC16C4.10	ptl1	-	SPCC1450.16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636260406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778348	2538922	2540629	275499	277155	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC21D10.09c	SPCC16C4.10	rkr1	-	SPBC21D10.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913509541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778349	2538922	2539188	275499	275759	SPCC16C4.10	SPCC1827.04	SPCC16C4.10	vms1	-	SPCC1827.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.11942969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778350	2538922	2541773	275499	278267	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC23H4.02	SPCC16C4.10	ppk9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.303681463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778351	2538922	2542303	275499	278770	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC1687.21	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC1687.21	-	SPAC222.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913323339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778352	2538922	2540245	275499	276777	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC31F10.17c	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC31F10.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578269556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778353	2538922	2543582	275499	279997	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC4H3.06	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC4H3.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.817035446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778354	2538922	3361476	275499	280552	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC16A10.04	SPCC16C4.10	rho4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323629447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778355	2538922	3361117	275499	280193	SPCC16C4.10	SPCC663.17	SPCC16C4.10	wtf15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035847744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778356	2538922	2542116	275499	278592	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC1B3.15c	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC1B3.15c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876694851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778357	2538922	2543569	275499	279984	SPCC16C4.10	SPAPB24D3.03	SPCC16C4.10	SPAPB24D3.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771584342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778358	2538922	2543072	275499	279505	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC3A12.09c	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC3A12.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816955672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778359	2538922	2541941	275499	278428	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC16C4.10	tfs1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.67198076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778360	2538922	2541528	275499	278028	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC24B11.14	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC24B11.14	-	SPAC806.10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.192959255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778361	2538922	2540808	275499	277327	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC418.02	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC418.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865149581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778362	2538922	2541539	275499	278039	SPCC16C4.10	SPAP27G11.12	SPCC16C4.10	SPAP27G11.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.443797791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778363	2538922	2538861	275499	275441	SPCC16C4.10	SPCC1620.11	SPCC16C4.10	nup97	-	mug87	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317235816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778364	2538922	2541129	275499	277644	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC713.11c	SPCC16C4.10	pmp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.562841891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778365	2538922	2543384	275499	279806	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC637.06	SPCC16C4.10	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815203728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778366	2538922	3361481	275499	280557	SPCC16C4.10	SPAPB24D3.05c	SPCC16C4.10	SPAPB24D3.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.255309753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778367	2538922	2539767	275499	276318	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC1703.06	SPCC16C4.10	pof10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.920051737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778368	2538922	2541472	275499	277974	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC589.11	SPCC16C4.10	pth4	-	mug82	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.07209458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778369	2538922	2540314	275499	276844	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC2G5.03	SPCC16C4.10	ctu1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.070855717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778370	2538922	2542566	275499	279022	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC8C9.12c	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC8C9.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.569180426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778371	2538922	2539583	275499	276142	SPCC16C4.10	SPCC777.04	SPCC16C4.10	SPCC777.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441281808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778372	2538922	2541869	275499	278359	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC22F3.13	SPCC16C4.10	tsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.566252588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778373	2538922	2543372	275499	279794	SPCC16C4.10	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC16C4.10	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.672406333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778374	2538922	2541080	275499	277595	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC557.04	SPCC16C4.10	ppk29	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.92588868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778375	2538922	2543090	275499	279523	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC1348.01	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC1348.01	-	SPAC1348.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877184085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778376	2538922	2541177	275499	277691	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC725.05c	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC725.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.740872053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778377	2538922	2541904	275499	278394	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC22F8.03c	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC22F8.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323516368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778378	2538922	2542617	275499	279071	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC13A11.01c	SPCC16C4.10	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.644008063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778379	2538922	2542908	275499	279352	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC13G7.03	SPCC16C4.10	upf3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818240981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778380	2538922	2542571	275499	279027	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC589.02c	SPCC16C4.10	med13	-	spTrap240|srb9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504637422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778381	2539442	2538977	276005	275551	SPCC5E4.04	SPCC1020.06c	cut1	tal1	ptr4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.843947368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778382	2539442	2540893	276005	277409	SPCC5E4.04	SPBC543.10	cut1	get1	ptr4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.991005405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778383	2539442	2540509	276005	277037	SPCC5E4.04	SPBC21H7.06c	cut1	opi10	ptr4	SPBC21H7.06c|Hikeshi	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.388286653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778384	2539442	2540987	276005	277503	SPCC5E4.04	SPBC36B7.05c	cut1	SPBC36B7.05c	ptr4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.339835042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778385	2539442	2539898	276005	276444	SPCC5E4.04	SPBC12D12.07c	cut1	trx2	ptr4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.945438784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778386	2539442	2541310	276005	277822	SPCC5E4.04	SPBP18G5.03	cut1	toc1	ptr4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318994219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778387	2539442	2540675	276005	277200	SPCC5E4.04	SPBC21H7.07c	cut1	his5	ptr4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.822718778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778388	2539442	2540844	276005	277361	SPCC5E4.04	SPBC1921.04c	cut1	SPBC1921.04c	ptr4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.355378836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778389	2539442	2540629	276005	277155	SPCC5E4.04	SPBC21D10.09c	cut1	rkr1	ptr4	SPBC21D10.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.421591396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778390	2539442	2538787	276005	275368	SPCC5E4.04	SPCC364.02c	cut1	bis1	ptr4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.705648711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778391	2539442	2540683	276005	277208	SPCC5E4.04	SPBC19G7.04	cut1	SPBC19G7.04	ptr4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.561507105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778392	2541095	2539302	277610	275870	SPBC725.06c	SPCC126.09	ppk31	zip2	mug25	SPCC126.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.249232817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778393	2541095	2542649	277610	279103	SPBC725.06c	SPAC24C9.14	ppk31	otu1	mug25	mug141	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454082755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778394	2541095	2541237	277610	277751	SPBC725.06c	SPBC947.04	ppk31	pfl3	mug25	SPBC947.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980339664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778395	2541095	2542168	277610	278643	SPBC725.06c	SPAC17A5.16	ppk31	ftp105	mug25	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.846612243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778396	2541095	2541876	277610	278366	SPBC725.06c	SPAP27G11.11c	ppk31	SPAP27G11.11c	mug25	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.698385136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778397	2541095	3361269	277610	280345	SPBC725.06c	SPBC31A8.01c	ppk31	rtn1	mug25	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449226945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778398	2541095	2542075	277610	278552	SPBC725.06c	SPAC27D7.06	ppk31	etf1	mug25	SPAC27D7.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.212934379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778399	2541095	2540304	277610	276834	SPBC725.06c	SPBC354.13	ppk31	rga6	mug25	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449395356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778400	2541095	2540699	277610	277223	SPBC725.06c	SPBC800.08	ppk31	gcd10	mug25	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.880486357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778401	2541095	2541149	277610	277664	SPBC725.06c	SPBC651.03c	ppk31	gyp10	mug25	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44344515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778402	2541095	2539170	277610	275741	SPBC725.06c	SPCC306.02c	ppk31	SPCC306.02c	mug25	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325768157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778403	2541095	2543277	277610	279705	SPBC725.06c	SPAC1002.03c	ppk31	gls2	mug25	gls2alpha	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199288087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778404	2541095	2543644	277610	280058	SPBC725.06c	SPAPB1A10.03	ppk31	nxt1	mug25	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451697825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778405	2542772	2540533	279221	277061	SPAC16.02c	SPBC29A10.16c	srp2	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.383065505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778406	2542772	3361389	279221	280465	SPAC16.02c	SPAC977.13c	srp2	SPAC977.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.51143197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778407	2542772	2543387	279221	279809	SPAC16.02c	SPAPB1E7.02c	srp2	mcl1	-	slr3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.225996715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778408	2538724	2541117	275308	277632	SPCC1442.01	SPBC646.13	ste6	sds23	SPCC1450.17	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380529962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778409	2538724	2540686	275308	277211	SPCC1442.01	SPBC21D10.10	ste6	bdc1	SPCC1450.17	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.053877708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778410	2538724	2541250	275308	277764	SPCC1442.01	SPBC8D2.17	ste6	gmh4	SPCC1450.17	SPBC8D2.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930754336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778411	2538724	2543412	275308	279834	SPCC1442.01	SPAC637.07	ste6	moe1	SPCC1450.17	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.319991274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778412	2538724	2542860	275308	279306	SPCC1442.01	SPAC8C9.09c	ste6	mug129	SPCC1450.17	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.82069672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778413	2538724	2541900	275308	278390	SPCC1442.01	SPAC23H4.17c	ste6	srb10	SPCC1450.17	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.443519865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778414	2538724	2542549	275308	279006	SPCC1442.01	SPAC19A8.11c	ste6	SPAC19A8.11c	SPCC1450.17	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.916915753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778415	2538724	2543113	275308	279545	SPCC1442.01	SPAC3F10.07c	ste6	erf4	SPCC1450.17	mug91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328754951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778416	2538724	2541156	275308	277671	SPCC1442.01	SPBC685.07c	ste6	rpl2701	SPCC1450.17	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.542674177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778417	2538724	2541909	275308	278399	SPCC1442.01	SPAC227.01c	ste6	erd1	SPCC1450.17	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.760863261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778418	2538724	2540800	275308	277319	SPCC1442.01	SPBC409.20c	ste6	psh3	SPCC1450.17	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.320047029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778419	2538724	2542458	275308	278919	SPCC1442.01	SPAC30.02c	ste6	SPAC30.02c	SPCC1450.17	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.190504851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778420	2538724	2543329	275308	279752	SPCC1442.01	SPAC56F8.02	ste6	SPAC56F8.02	SPCC1450.17	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989660367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778421	2538724	2543337	275308	279760	SPCC1442.01	SPAC959.08	ste6	rpl2102	SPCC1450.17	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385440552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778422	2540302	2543291	276832	279716	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC9E9.04	cwf28	SPAC9E9.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.045957223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778423	2540302	2539156	276832	275728	SPBC3B9.02c	SPCC1450.08c	cwf28	wtf16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.737848839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778424	2540302	2540524	276832	277052	SPBC3B9.02c	SPBC21B10.08c	cwf28	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320764363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778425	2540302	3361561	276832	280637	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC11E3.01c	cwf28	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.219461552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778426	2540302	2539939	276832	276483	SPBC3B9.02c	SPBC11G11.01	cwf28	fis1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.39968062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778427	2540302	2539068	276832	275640	SPBC3B9.02c	SPCC1442.11c	cwf28	SPCC1442.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.865032442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778428	2540302	5802945	276832	858083	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC19G12.16c	cwf28	adg2	-	SPAC23A1.01c|mug46	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.761673573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778429	2540302	2539201	276832	275772	SPBC3B9.02c	SPCC188.09c	cwf28	pfl4	-	SPCC188.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.070142063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778430	2540302	2541082	276832	277597	SPBC3B9.02c	SPBC577.11	cwf28	SPBC577.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.889096426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778431	2540302	2539208	276832	275778	SPBC3B9.02c	SPCC1450.11c	cwf28	cek1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.976544199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778432	2540302	2542677	276832	279130	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC26F1.10c	cwf28	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994257179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778433	2540302	2541012	276832	277527	SPBC3B9.02c	SPBC3H7.12	cwf28	rav2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391116532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778434	2540302	2539235	276832	275805	SPBC3B9.02c	SPCC1682.15	cwf28	mug122	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.063823788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778435	2540302	2539472	276832	276035	SPBC3B9.02c	SPCC794.03	cwf28	SPCC794.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.355823677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778436	2540302	2542848	276832	279294	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC9G1.03c	cwf28	rpl3001	-	rpl30|rpl30-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.560983248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778437	2540302	2542555	276832	279012	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC1952.06c	cwf28	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328287243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778438	2540302	2541781	276832	278274	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC23G3.07c	cwf28	snf30	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45794814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778439	2540302	2542165	276832	278641	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC1782.08c	cwf28	rex3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699372608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778440	2540302	2541323	276832	277835	SPBC3B9.02c	SPBP35G2.14	cwf28	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.400206662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778441	2540302	2541527	276832	278027	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC31A2.09c	cwf28	apm4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.479731251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778442	2540302	2542220	276832	278694	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC1A6.03c	cwf28	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.083185019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778443	2540302	2539648	276832	276203	SPBC3B9.02c	SPBC1198.08	cwf28	SPBC1198.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.40038519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778444	2540302	2543551	276832	279968	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC4G8.06c	cwf28	trm12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.150592726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778445	2540302	2538698	276832	275283	SPBC3B9.02c	SPCC1442.02	cwf28	SPCC1442.02	-	SPCC1450.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446742112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778446	2540302	2541522	276832	278023	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC23E2.01	cwf28	fep1	-	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.127068415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778447	2540302	2543426	276832	279846	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC631.02	cwf28	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.152209861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778448	2540302	2543573	276832	279988	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC869.11	cwf28	cat1	-	SPAC922.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.563486556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778449	2540302	2539237	276832	275807	SPBC3B9.02c	SPCC24B10.13	cwf28	skb5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.82288574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778450	2540302	2539051	276832	275624	SPBC3B9.02c	SPCC1183.11	cwf28	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.279924157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778451	2540302	2538821	276832	275402	SPBC3B9.02c	SPCC584.01c	cwf28	SPCC584.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.759489392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778452	2540302	2540903	276832	277419	SPBC3B9.02c	SPBC530.05	cwf28	prt1	-	SPBC530.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.908075704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778453	2540302	2543272	276832	279700	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC1002.07c	cwf28	ats1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.971396359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778454	2540302	2543412	276832	279834	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC637.07	cwf28	moe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.503379685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778455	2540302	2540673	276832	277198	SPBC3B9.02c	SPBC1D7.03	cwf28	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.69743833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778456	2540302	2541192	276832	277706	SPBC3B9.02c	SPBC83.17	cwf28	SPBC83.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.262900037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778457	2540302	2540363	276832	276892	SPBC3B9.02c	SPBC2F12.09c	cwf28	atf21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443087877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778458	2540302	2541911	276832	278401	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC212.04c	cwf28	SPAC212.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.287156943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778459	2540302	2542989	276832	279427	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC11E3.13c	cwf28	gas5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.311664621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778460	2540302	2542921	276832	279362	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC1093.01	cwf28	ppr5	-	SPAC12B10.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445712064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778461	2540302	2541096	276832	277611	SPBC3B9.02c	SPBC725.10	cwf28	SPBC725.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776979655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778462	2540302	2542357	276832	278822	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC1782.07	cwf28	qcr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.849460295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778463	2540302	2540086	276832	276624	SPBC3B9.02c	SPBC16H5.12c	cwf28	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.13044274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778464	2540302	2540231	276832	276763	SPBC3B9.02c	SPBC336.14c	cwf28	ppk26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.655651232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778465	2540302	2543250	276832	279678	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC3G9.15c	cwf28	fcf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505414466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778466	2540302	2538873	276832	275452	SPBC3B9.02c	SPCC306.11	cwf28	SPCC306.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.734355327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778467	2540302	2542710	276832	279163	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC750.08c	cwf28	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.124796805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778468	2540302	3361569	276832	280645	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC186.04c	cwf28	SPAC186.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329857194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778469	2540302	2541903	276832	278393	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC22F8.05	cwf28	SPAC22F8.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.71526963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778470	2540302	2538935	276832	275511	SPBC3B9.02c	SPCC1682.11c	cwf28	ctl1	-	SPCC1682.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.332057482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778471	2540302	5802861	276832	857999	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC1D4.01	cwf28	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.190835101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778472	2540302	2539953	276832	276497	SPBC3B9.02c	SPBC1709.11c	cwf28	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.291752068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778473	2540302	2543683	276832	280097	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAPB1E7.04c	cwf28	SPAPB1E7.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.046034939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778474	2540302	2538708	276832	275292	SPBC3B9.02c	SPCC594.01	cwf28	SPCC594.01	-	SPCC736.16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568265309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778475	2540302	2538828	276832	275409	SPBC3B9.02c	SPCC1020.05	cwf28	SPCC1020.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.52550522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778476	2540302	2539427	276832	275992	SPBC3B9.02c	SPCC663.15c	cwf28	SPCC663.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.829664791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778477	2540302	2538884	276832	275462	SPBC3B9.02c	SPCC1393.08	cwf28	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513434229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778478	2540302	2542255	276832	278725	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC57A7.08	cwf28	pzh1	-	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.65509864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778479	2540302	2541896	276832	278386	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC23H4.16c	cwf28	SPAC23H4.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.130020617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778480	2540302	2540643	276832	277168	SPBC3B9.02c	SPBC19G7.06	cwf28	mbx1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.604756329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778481	2540302	2542875	276832	279320	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC13G7.02c	cwf28	ssa1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769382294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778482	2540302	2539160	276832	275732	SPBC3B9.02c	SPCC18.17c	cwf28	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.244450689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778483	2540302	2541156	276832	277671	SPBC3B9.02c	SPBC685.07c	cwf28	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.050763012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778484	2540302	2539137	276832	275709	SPBC3B9.02c	SPCC1682.08c	cwf28	mcp2	-	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.031500831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778485	2540302	2540779	276832	277298	SPBC3B9.02c	SPBC19F8.06c	cwf28	meu22	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.338543427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778486	2540302	2542881	276832	279326	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC13F5.03c	cwf28	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.864146511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778487	2540302	2538966	276832	275540	SPBC3B9.02c	SPCC18.10	cwf28	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.907855269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778488	2540302	2543096	276832	279528	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC977.05c	cwf28	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.472687461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778489	2540302	2539239	276832	275809	SPBC3B9.02c	SPCC1020.10	cwf28	oca2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.433232242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778490	2540302	2541425	276832	277930	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC2C4.17c	cwf28	msy2	-	SPAC2C4.17c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.435083785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778491	2540302	2540115	276832	276652	SPBC3B9.02c	SPBC1778.02	cwf28	rap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.898444121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778492	2540302	2540829	276832	277347	SPBC3B9.02c	SPBC800.09	cwf28	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.715324049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778493	2540302	2542222	276832	278695	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC31G5.18c	cwf28	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.820649116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778494	2540302	2543437	276832	279857	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAPB1A10.14	cwf28	pof15	-	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.191867773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778495	2540302	2543183	276832	279612	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC3A12.06c	cwf28	SPAC3A12.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.861100874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778496	2540302	2541637	276832	278133	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC57A10.04	cwf28	mug10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.650945121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778497	2540302	2539726	276832	276278	SPBC3B9.02c	SPBC13E7.08c	cwf28	leo1	-	SPBC13E7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320039035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778498	2540302	2543525	276832	279943	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC4A8.14	cwf28	SPAC4A8.14	-	prs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.76519097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778499	2540302	2539189	276832	275760	SPBC3B9.02c	SPCC1682.16	cwf28	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.145275537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778500	2540302	2542244	276832	278714	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC19G12.13c	cwf28	poz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.912194167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778501	2540302	2541050	276832	277565	SPBC3B9.02c	SPBC428.05c	cwf28	arg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.33022764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778502	2540302	2543090	276832	279523	SPBC3B9.02c	SPBC1348.01	cwf28	SPBC1348.01	-	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.899574273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778503	2540302	2540309	276832	276839	SPBC3B9.02c	SPBC21B10.13c	cwf28	yox1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809121468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778504	2540302	2542943	276832	279384	SPBC3B9.02c	SPBC1348.03	cwf28	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709012757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778505	2540302	2541576	276832	278073	SPBC3B9.02c	SPBC1348.02	cwf28	SPBC1348.02	-	SPAC1348.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.135886583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778506	2540302	2543646	276832	280060	SPBC3B9.02c	SPAC821.07c	cwf28	moc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.052645016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778507	2540302	2541062	276832	277577	SPBC3B9.02c	SPBC660.11	cwf28	tcg1	-	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.393005715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778508	2540302	2540734	276832	277257	SPBC3B9.02c	SPBC19G7.09	cwf28	ulp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.954269429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778509	2541330	2543529	277842	279947	SPBP35G2.06c	SPAC4C5.02c	nup131	ryh1	Nup133a	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.947062853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778510	2541330	2543641	277842	280055	SPBP35G2.06c	SPAC3H5.08c	nup131	SPAC3H5.08c	Nup133a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.628942917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778511	2541330	2539481	277842	276044	SPBP35G2.06c	SPCC622.16c	nup131	epe1	Nup133a	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.25117792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778512	2541330	2540442	277842	276970	SPBP35G2.06c	SPBC25B2.04c	nup131	mtg1	Nup133a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389064927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778513	2541330	2538792	277842	275373	SPBP35G2.06c	SPCP1E11.10	nup131	SPCP1E11.10	Nup133a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.921936097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778514	2541330	2542716	277842	279169	SPBP35G2.06c	SPAC25H1.07	nup131	emc1	Nup133a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.314719767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778515	2541004	2538939	277519	275514	SPBC3F6.01c	SPCC1672.04c	SPBC3F6.01c	SPCC1672.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.327821914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778516	2541004	2539575	277519	276135	SPBC3F6.01c	SPCP20C8.02c	SPBC3F6.01c	SPCP20C8.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64638701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778517	2541004	2541761	277519	278255	SPBC3F6.01c	SPAC7D4.12c	SPBC3F6.01c	SPAC7D4.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38001343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778518	2541004	2541663	277519	278159	SPBC3F6.01c	SPAC22G7.08	SPBC3F6.01c	ppk8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.463350576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778519	2541004	2541800	277519	278291	SPBC3F6.01c	SPAC732.02c	SPBC3F6.01c	SPAC732.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989269582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778520	2541004	2543412	277519	279834	SPBC3F6.01c	SPAC637.07	SPBC3F6.01c	moe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.445602587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778521	2541004	2540673	277519	277198	SPBC3F6.01c	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC3F6.01c	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706862862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778522	2541004	2541496	277519	277998	SPBC3F6.01c	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC3F6.01c	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.62734354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778523	2541004	2540086	277519	276624	SPBC3F6.01c	SPBC16H5.12c	SPBC3F6.01c	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317067396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778524	2541004	2542710	277519	279163	SPBC3F6.01c	SPAC750.08c	SPBC3F6.01c	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.952449596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778525	2541004	2541900	277519	278390	SPBC3F6.01c	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC3F6.01c	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.851150525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778526	2541004	2542519	277519	278977	SPBC3F6.01c	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC3F6.01c	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.989184194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778527	2541004	2542439	277519	278901	SPBC3F6.01c	SPAC17A5.08	SPBC3F6.01c	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446800187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778528	2541004	2541142	277519	277657	SPBC3F6.01c	SPBC725.04	SPBC3F6.01c	SPBC725.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.332665742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778529	2541004	2540967	277519	277483	SPBC3F6.01c	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC3F6.01c	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.431734032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778530	2541004	2541378	277519	277889	SPBC3F6.01c	SPBP8B7.21	SPBC3F6.01c	ubp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.815057496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778531	2541004	2540821	277519	277339	SPBC3F6.01c	SPBC800.03	SPBC3F6.01c	clr3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984226548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778532	2541004	2542418	277519	278881	SPBC3F6.01c	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC3F6.01c	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712356514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778533	2541004	2542716	277519	279169	SPBC3F6.01c	SPAC25H1.07	SPBC3F6.01c	emc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507323926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778534	2541004	2543384	277519	279806	SPBC3F6.01c	SPAC637.06	SPBC3F6.01c	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.255836106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778535	2542392	2542895	278856	279339	SPAC19D5.02c	SPAC13G6.10c	SPAC19D5.02c	asl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.814184207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778536	2542392	2542107	278856	278583	SPAC19D5.02c	SPAC30.01c	SPAC19D5.02c	sec72	-	sec7b|sec702	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770392877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778537	2542392	2539845	278856	276393	SPAC19D5.02c	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC19D5.02c	ste20	-	ste16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.245229507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778538	2542392	2542439	278856	278901	SPAC19D5.02c	SPAC17A5.08	SPAC19D5.02c	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45381812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778539	2542392	2541713	278856	278208	SPAC19D5.02c	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC19D5.02c	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.900803974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778540	2542392	2539101	278856	275673	SPAC19D5.02c	SPCC736.04c	SPAC19D5.02c	gma12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.133370995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778541	2542392	2543472	278856	279892	SPAC19D5.02c	SPAC959.04c	SPAC19D5.02c	omh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.486517075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778542	2542392	2541297	278856	277809	SPAC19D5.02c	SPBC9B6.07	SPAC19D5.02c	nop52	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378882279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778543	2542318	2542207	278784	278682	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC17H9.10c	cph1	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.918226484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778544	2542318	2539050	278784	275623	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC11E10.08	cph1	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.646007036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778545	2542318	2539147	278784	275719	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC622.12c	cph1	gdh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.923739682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778546	2542318	2542862	278784	279308	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC140.03	cph1	arb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.251996996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778547	2542318	2538961	278784	275535	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC285.14	cph1	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.987608106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778548	2542318	2539549	278784	276110	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC576.01c	cph1	xan1	-	SPCC576.01c|SPCPB1C11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439335723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778549	2542318	2540885	278784	277402	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC660.14	cph1	mik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.212457647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778550	2542318	2542518	278784	278976	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC1B3.16c	cph1	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.268185227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778551	2542318	2541512	278784	278013	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC11E3.08c	cph1	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.124922206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778552	2542318	2540913	278784	277429	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC56F2.08c	cph1	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.35703221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778553	2542318	2540235	278784	276767	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC336.13c	cph1	SPBC336.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.329059692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778554	2542318	2540026	278784	276570	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC16D10.08c	cph1	hsp104	-	SPBC16D10.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.963618414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778555	2542318	2541015	278784	277530	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC409.08	cph1	SPBC409.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781666483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778556	2542318	2543064	278784	279497	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC3G6.01	cph1	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.763503525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778557	2542318	2542671	278784	279124	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC824.09c	cph1	SPAC824.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.877487908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778558	2542318	2540653	278784	277178	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC215.07c	cph1	SPBC215.07c	-	pdp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700792105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778559	2542318	2539156	278784	275728	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC1450.08c	cph1	wtf16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.86713668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778560	2542318	2539582	278784	276141	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC594.07c	cph1	bqt3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.225052414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778561	2542318	2540524	278784	277052	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC21B10.08c	cph1	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701225285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778562	2542318	2542358	278784	278823	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC1782.09c	cph1	clp1	-	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.517295368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778563	2542318	2541650	278784	278146	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC14C4.12c	cph1	laf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.175938229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778564	2542318	2542378	278784	278842	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC1805.04	cph1	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.493476821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778565	2542318	2540528	278784	277056	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC18H10.04c	cph1	sce3	-	tif48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.215301223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778566	2542318	2539035	278784	275608	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC794.09c	cph1	tef101	-	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.225000495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778567	2542318	2539930	278784	276474	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC1198.11c	cph1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.174698441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778568	2542318	3361561	278784	280637	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC11E3.01c	cph1	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.765703022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778569	2542318	2541130	278784	277645	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC776.11	cph1	rpl2801	-	rpl28-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.039083081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778570	2542318	2539068	278784	275640	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC1442.11c	cph1	SPCC1442.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.271874892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778571	2542318	2541853	278784	278344	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC2F3.11	cph1	SPAC2F3.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.705343451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778572	2542318	2540296	278784	276827	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC2D10.05	cph1	exg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.691810379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778573	2542318	2542224	278784	278697	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC19G12.03	cph1	cda1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.14401776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778574	2542318	2541856	278784	278347	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC23H3.08c	cph1	bub3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.560492106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778575	2542318	2541117	278784	277632	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC646.13	cph1	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647633156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778576	2542318	2539196	278784	275767	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC1795.03	cph1	gms1	-	gmn3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.266730177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778577	2542318	2541633	278784	278129	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC664.01c	cph1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.480199347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778578	2542318	2540694	278784	277218	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC19C7.10	cph1	bqt4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.244820361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778579	2542318	2543434	278784	279854	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC8F11.02c	cph1	dph3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.433075126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778580	2542318	2542071	278784	278548	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC26H5.03	cph1	pcf2	-	cac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.352123283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778581	2542318	2542701	278784	279154	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC26H5.05	cph1	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.175845787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778582	2542318	2541771	278784	278265	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC23H3.06	cph1	apl6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.686899624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778583	2542318	2538922	278784	275499	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC16C4.10	cph1	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.901933962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778584	2542318	2542103	278784	278579	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC31G5.11	cph1	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.122764066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778585	2542318	2543270	278784	279698	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC1002.02	cph1	pom34	-	mug31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.839838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778586	2542318	2540491	278784	277019	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC28E12.04	cph1	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.266320046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778587	2542318	2542892	278784	279336	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC13F5.04c	cph1	vta1	-	SPAC13F5.04c|new6|SPAC13F5.08|vts1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.073158579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778588	2542318	2540664	278784	277189	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC215.02	cph1	bob1	-	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.47152648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778589	2542318	2538806	278784	275387	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC1840.09	cph1	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383212452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778590	2542318	2539451	278784	276014	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC63.13	cph1	SPCC63.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.384416516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778591	2542318	2543320	278784	279744	SPAC16C9.05	SPAPJ695.01c	cph1	SPAPJ695.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.039153725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778592	2542318	2541891	278784	278381	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC1F8.03c	cph1	str3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.380588917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778593	2542318	3361375	278784	280451	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC212.06c	cph1	SPAC212.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05936232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778594	2542318	2539226	278784	275796	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC16C4.20c	cph1	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.277642223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778595	2542318	2540975	278784	277491	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC354.12	cph1	gpd3	-	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.715692136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778596	2542318	2539420	278784	275985	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC970.07c	cph1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.40014789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778597	2542318	2541200	278784	277714	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC8D2.03c	cph1	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.044051254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778598	2542318	2542677	278784	279130	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC26F1.10c	cph1	pyp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.724480971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778599	2542318	2540979	278784	277495	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC3H7.10	cph1	elp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.338669437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778600	2542318	2538847	278784	275428	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC594.06c	cph1	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.90455266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778601	2542318	2538775	278784	275357	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC23B6.05c	cph1	ssb3	-	rpa3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.419511475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778602	2542318	2539564	278784	276125	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC550.12	cph1	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.995474958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778603	2542318	2539463	278784	276026	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC550.11	cph1	SPCC550.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.042022756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778604	2542318	2542669	278784	279122	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC29B12.08	cph1	clr5	-	SPAC29B12.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.394725773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778605	2542318	2543681	278784	280095	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC9.02c	cph1	SPAC9.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.991900478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778606	2542318	2542689	278784	279142	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC29B12.04	cph1	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.188719851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778607	2542318	2542724	278784	279175	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC767.01c	cph1	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.679818197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778608	2542318	2540919	278784	277435	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC543.07	cph1	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.348772019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778609	2542318	2540945	278784	277461	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC342.06c	cph1	rtt109	-	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.382963382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778610	2542318	2539576	278784	276136	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC794.01c	cph1	zwf2	-	SPCC794.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.915202148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778611	2542318	2543137	278784	279569	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC869.04	cph1	SPAC869.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.397473404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778612	2542318	2543453	278784	279873	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC3G9.03	cph1	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.744044214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778613	2542318	2541026	278784	277541	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC337.09	cph1	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.058953364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778614	2542318	2542627	278784	279081	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC750.04c	cph1	SPAC750.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.112819411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778615	2542318	2540095	278784	276633	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC115.03	cph1	SPBC115.03	-	SPBC839.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.695428411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778616	2542318	2539575	278784	276135	SPAC16C9.05	SPCP20C8.02c	cph1	SPCP20C8.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327957685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778617	2542318	2540929	278784	277445	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC354.03	cph1	swd3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.846609394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778618	2542318	2541558	278784	278057	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC1F7.08	cph1	fio1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.180386045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778619	2542318	2541119	278784	277634	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC651.11c	cph1	apm3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.462877328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778620	2542318	2541761	278784	278255	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC7D4.12c	cph1	SPAC7D4.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.674338025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778621	2542318	2540993	278784	277509	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC342.01c	cph1	alg6	-	SPBC3F6.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.885881149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778622	2542318	3361342	278784	280418	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC16D10.07c	cph1	sir2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517438431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778623	2542318	2542165	278784	278641	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC1782.08c	cph1	rex3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.379438163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778624	2542318	2541227	278784	277741	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC947.05c	cph1	frp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.836727886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778625	2542318	2541323	278784	277835	SPAC16C9.05	SPBP35G2.14	cph1	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.753729734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778626	2542318	2540425	278784	276953	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC27.06c	cph1	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.960458803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778627	2542318	2539365	278784	275931	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC24B10.16c	cph1	SPCC24B10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.390087256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778628	2542318	2543685	278784	280099	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC3C7.03c	cph1	rad55	-	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.182541228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778629	2542318	2540595	278784	277121	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC21C3.02c	cph1	dep1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.207213901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778630	2542318	2540663	278784	277188	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC56F2.06	cph1	mug147	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.193886526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778631	2542318	2539129	278784	275701	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC338.14	cph1	ado1	-	SPCC338.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.720216612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778632	2542318	2539961	278784	276505	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC1198.09	cph1	ubc16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.312531949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778633	2542318	2539244	278784	275814	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC1672.06c	cph1	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.833883394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778634	2542318	2543563	278784	279979	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC664.02c	cph1	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.03179995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778635	2542318	2543426	278784	279846	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC631.02	cph1	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.628064777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778636	2542318	2541905	278784	278395	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC6G9.01c	cph1	SPAC6G9.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.625487011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778637	2542318	2541416	278784	277923	SPAC16C9.05	SPBCPT2R1.01c	cph1	SPBCPT2R1.01c	-	SPBPB2B2.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.547620016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778638	2542318	2543319	278784	279743	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC6B12.09	cph1	trm10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.347938143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778639	2542318	2539381	278784	275947	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC1739.10	cph1	mug33	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633633095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778640	2542318	2538906	278784	275483	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC1259.03	cph1	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.452057842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778641	2542318	2538845	278784	275426	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC1235.13	cph1	ght6	-	meu12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.917146484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778642	2542318	2542981	278784	279419	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC824.02	cph1	bst1	-	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.407910117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778643	2542318	2542213	278784	278687	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC3G6.13c	cph1	rpl4101	-	rpl41-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.49681613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778644	2542318	2542791	278784	279240	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC167.04	cph1	pam17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.047951107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778645	2542318	2540825	278784	277343	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC428.08c	cph1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.11117563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778646	2542318	2541021	278784	277536	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC3B8.10c	cph1	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.552875149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778647	2542318	2540964	278784	277480	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC365.16	cph1	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.160915914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778648	2542318	2539310	278784	275877	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC285.17	cph1	spp27	-	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382288198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778649	2542318	2543651	278784	280065	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC644.11c	cph1	pkp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.88992581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778650	2542318	2542239	278784	278711	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC18G6.02c	cph1	chp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.291155121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778651	2542318	2539023	278784	275596	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC594.05c	cph1	spf1	-	spp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093030081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778652	2542318	2542268	278784	278737	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC17A5.07c	cph1	ulp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.394350391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778653	2542318	2541339	278784	277850	SPAC16C9.05	SPBP4G3.02	cph1	pho1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.969029445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778654	2542318	2542036	278784	278518	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC23A1.19c	cph1	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.217245262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778655	2542318	2539467	278784	276030	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC417.07c	cph1	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.828470676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778656	2542318	2542311	278784	278777	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC16A10.05c	cph1	dad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.488848663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778657	2542318	3361461	278784	280537	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC11H11.01	cph1	sst6	-	cps23	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092363991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778658	2542318	2542896	278784	279340	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC3F10.04	cph1	gsa1	-	gsh2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875237239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778659	2542318	2543135	278784	279567	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC869.06c	cph1	SPAC869.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.033423175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778660	2542318	2542177	278784	278652	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC17H9.08	cph1	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.385091361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778661	2542318	2542596	278784	279050	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC1B3.17	cph1	clr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.225741244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778662	2542318	2540797	278784	277316	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC18H10.11c	cph1	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.15176067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778663	2542318	2540631	278784	277157	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC25B2.10	cph1	SPBC25B2.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.312885263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778664	2542318	2541249	278784	277763	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC947.01	cph1	alf1	-	SPBC947.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.345411481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778665	2542318	2540892	278784	277408	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC530.01	cph1	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383744918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778666	2542318	2541800	278784	278291	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC732.02c	cph1	SPAC732.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.915189754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778667	2542318	2541776	278784	278270	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC23H3.05c	cph1	swd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.799909399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778668	2542318	2542863	278784	279309	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC13G7.04c	cph1	mac1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809192449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778669	2542318	2543144	278784	279576	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC3F10.05c	cph1	mug113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.262500741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778670	2542318	2542707	278784	279160	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC25G10.03	cph1	zip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.273801491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778671	2542318	2541160	278784	277675	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC725.09c	cph1	hob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.696481472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778672	2542318	2540348	278784	276877	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC29A10.05	cph1	exo1	-	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.522061886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778673	2542318	2540338	278784	276867	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC2G2.13c	cph1	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.560480249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778674	2542318	2540922	278784	277438	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC36.10	cph1	SPBC36.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.949127949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778675	2542318	2542123	278784	278599	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC18G6.15	cph1	mal3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708358365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778676	2542318	2538706	278784	275290	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC338.08	cph1	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.431975483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778677	2542318	2542544	278784	279001	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC18G6.10	cph1	lem2	-	heh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.145373485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778678	2542318	2540352	278784	276881	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC215.03c	cph1	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.04690913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778679	2542318	2543412	278784	279834	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC637.07	cph1	moe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.943358762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778680	2542318	2539733	278784	276285	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC16E9.12c	cph1	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.34958285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778681	2542318	2540396	278784	276924	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC31F10.12	cph1	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.561873896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778682	2542318	2540673	278784	277198	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC1D7.03	cph1	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.625574377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778683	2542318	2540150	278784	276687	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC16E9.14c	cph1	zrg17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.039449799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778684	2542318	2541911	278784	278401	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC212.04c	cph1	SPAC212.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.128664002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778685	2542318	2542989	278784	279427	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC11E3.13c	cph1	gas5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.850162583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778686	2542318	2541258	278784	277772	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC8E4.01c	cph1	SPBC8E4.01c	-	SPBP4G3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.179513475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778687	2542318	2541496	278784	277998	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC23D3.09	cph1	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.972417995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778688	2542318	2543667	278784	280081	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC4H3.02c	cph1	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.952016849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778689	2542318	2542925	278784	279366	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC11E3.04c	cph1	ubc13	-	spu13|sst5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.029918195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778690	2542318	2539603	278784	276161	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC1289.06c	cph1	ppr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.328394595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778691	2542318	2541310	278784	277822	SPAC16C9.05	SPBP18G5.03	cph1	toc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.84553194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778692	2542318	2541532	278784	278032	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC2C4.15c	cph1	ubx2	-	ucp13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.829445451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778693	2542318	2542651	278784	279105	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC24C9.12c	cph1	SPAC24C9.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.422298148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778694	2542318	2542193	278784	278668	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC9G1.11c	cph1	spn4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.020520533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778695	2542318	2542611	278784	279065	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC29A4.05	cph1	cam2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.260764085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778696	2542318	2542857	278784	279303	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC144.06	cph1	apl5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.404956001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778697	2542318	2543250	278784	279678	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC3G9.15c	cph1	fcf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.066446621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778698	2542318	2542691	278784	279144	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC26H5.07c	cph1	SPAC26H5.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.250920065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778699	2542318	2541710	278784	278205	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC343.11c	cph1	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.472243941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778700	2542318	3361269	278784	280345	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC31A8.01c	cph1	rtn1	-	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.000907187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778701	2542318	2539000	278784	275574	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC1450.06c	cph1	grx3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.195341476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778702	2542318	2540665	278784	277190	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC83.02c	cph1	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.009076209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778703	2542318	2542007	278784	278490	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC20H4.07	cph1	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2578869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778704	2542318	2538873	278784	275452	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC306.11	cph1	SPCC306.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.944868605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778705	2542318	2543244	278784	279672	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC6B12.06c	cph1	rrg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.624584987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778706	2542318	2540256	278784	276787	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC32F12.12c	cph1	SPBC32F12.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929728616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778707	2542318	2542976	278784	279414	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC9E9.09c	cph1	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.263458361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778708	2542318	2539815	278784	276365	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC1105.02c	cph1	lys4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.080635504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778709	2542318	2538837	278784	275418	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC4B3.03c	cph1	SPCC4B3.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.27042657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778710	2542318	3361569	278784	280645	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC186.04c	cph1	SPAC186.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.173847565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778711	2542318	2540836	278784	277354	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC18H10.19	cph1	vps38	-	atg14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199836491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778712	2542318	2539232	278784	275802	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC1223.04c	cph1	set11	-	mug76	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.473745007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778713	2542318	3361403	278784	280479	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC27D7.12c	cph1	but1	-	SPAC27D7.12|mug107|prx	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.941531089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778714	2542318	2543301	278784	279726	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC977.17	cph1	SPAC977.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.379902426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778715	2542318	2542398	278784	278862	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC1805.03c	cph1	trm13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.615498043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778716	2542318	2540318	278784	276848	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC30B4.04c	cph1	sol1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.30589451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778717	2542318	2542549	278784	279006	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC19A8.11c	cph1	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.565968312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778718	2542318	2539408	278784	275973	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC576.12c	cph1	mhf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.268639821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778719	2542318	2542519	278784	278977	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC19G12.08	cph1	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.227264679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778720	2542318	2539481	278784	276044	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC622.16c	cph1	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.808269052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778721	2542318	2539953	278784	276497	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC1709.11c	cph1	png2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.713580622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778722	2542318	2542919	278784	279360	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC6C3.08	cph1	nas6	-	SPAC6C3.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.744062782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778723	2542318	2543683	278784	280097	SPAC16C9.05	SPAPB1E7.04c	cph1	SPAPB1E7.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.302596695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778724	2542318	2543576	278784	279991	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC4A8.05c	cph1	myp2	-	myo3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.499960761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778725	2542318	2540387	278784	276915	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC24C6.04	cph1	SPBC24C6.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.551472819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778726	2542318	2538824	278784	275405	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC1442.14c	cph1	hnt1	-	SPCC1442.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.169489397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778727	2542318	2543443	278784	279863	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC3H1.12c	cph1	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.161191714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778728	2542318	2541694	278784	278190	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC1071.04c	cph1	spc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.257239225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778729	2542318	2538708	278784	275292	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC594.01	cph1	SPCC594.01	-	SPCC736.16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.555465974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778730	2542318	2541112	278784	277627	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC725.07	cph1	pex5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.914984237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778731	2542318	2541536	278784	278036	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC1071.02	cph1	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.564206748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778732	2542318	2540201	278784	276734	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC13A2.04c	cph1	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.912620143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778733	2542318	2540967	278784	277483	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC36B7.08c	cph1	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.861323544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778734	2542318	2541410	278784	277918	SPAC16C9.05	SPBPB2B2.17c	cph1	SPBPB2B2.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.135440071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778735	2542318	2539847	278784	276395	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC530.14c	cph1	dsk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985971605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778736	2542318	2538828	278784	275409	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC1020.05	cph1	SPCC1020.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.736000241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778737	2542318	2540184	278784	276717	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC106.12c	cph1	SPBC106.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.903967009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778738	2542318	2541296	278784	277808	SPAC16C9.05	SPBP8B7.06	cph1	rpp201	-	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.054771335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778739	2542318	2540533	278784	277061	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC29A10.16c	cph1	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.968694805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778740	2542318	2541614	278784	278111	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC29A4.20	cph1	elp3	-	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.060875536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778741	2542318	2538884	278784	275462	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC1393.08	cph1	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.079671758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778742	2542318	2539421	278784	275986	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC794.11c	cph1	ent3	-	SPCC794.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.978348931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778743	2542318	2541337	278784	277848	SPAC16C9.05	SPBP35G2.13c	cph1	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.94025751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778744	2542318	2540937	278784	277453	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC359.05	cph1	abc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.549084577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778745	2542318	2540930	278784	277446	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC354.10	cph1	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.964736134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778746	2542318	2542602	278784	279056	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC186.09	cph1	SPAC186.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515245592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778747	2542318	2541742	278784	278236	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC22H10.09	cph1	SPAC22H10.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.21503171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778748	2542318	2542595	278784	279049	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC186.06	cph1	SPAC186.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.573124504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778749	2542318	2538848	278784	275429	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC613.12c	cph1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.159395181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778750	2542318	3361520	278784	280596	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC1610.02c	cph1	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.699734535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778751	2542318	2541017	278784	277532	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC36.07	cph1	elp1	-	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.322817422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778752	2542318	2540946	278784	277462	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC36.04	cph1	cys11	-	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.496453216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778753	2542318	2541628	278784	278124	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC110.02	cph1	pds5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.610897086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778754	2542318	2542875	278784	279320	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC13G7.02c	cph1	ssa1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.875487189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778755	2542318	2540821	278784	277339	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC800.03	cph1	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.01058972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778756	2542318	2539538	278784	276100	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC364.06	cph1	nap1	-	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321361937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778757	2542318	2539908	278784	276454	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC13E7.06	cph1	msd1	-	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.47315149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778758	2542318	2540001	278784	276545	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC1289.13c	cph1	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.345294483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778759	2542318	2542806	278784	279254	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC1610.01	cph1	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864981094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778760	2542318	2538907	278784	275484	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC24B10.19c	cph1	nts1	-	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.126441171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778761	2542318	2539160	278784	275732	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC18.17c	cph1	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.553159791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778762	2542318	2542992	278784	279430	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC1071.09c	cph1	SPAC1071.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.437965445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778763	2542318	2541156	278784	277671	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC685.07c	cph1	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.755487246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778764	2542318	2539499	278784	276062	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC622.08c	cph1	hta1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.717446664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778765	2542318	2538762	278784	275345	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC306.04c	cph1	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.151035383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778766	2542318	2543619	278784	280033	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC4F10.04	cph1	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.97064575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778767	2542318	2540619	278784	277145	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC25H2.15	cph1	SPBC25H2.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.900291458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778768	2542318	2540849	278784	277366	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC428.11	cph1	met17	-	SPBC428.11|cys2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.81228045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778769	2542318	2538815	278784	275396	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC1322.15	cph1	rpl3402	-	rpl34|rpl34-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.474739711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778770	2542318	2541175	278784	277689	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC839.13c	cph1	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.168818041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778771	2542318	2539137	278784	275709	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC1682.08c	cph1	mcp2	-	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.143242017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778772	2542318	2543567	278784	279983	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC890.03	cph1	ppk16	-	mug92	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.482126167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778773	2542318	2540498	278784	277026	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC27.02c	cph1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.00738495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778774	2542318	2542881	278784	279326	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC13F5.03c	cph1	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.55954584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778775	2542318	2540800	278784	277319	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC409.20c	cph1	psh3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.88030959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778776	2542318	2541689	278784	278185	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC24C9.05c	cph1	mug70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.306890816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778777	2542318	2543304	278784	279728	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC6B12.12	cph1	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.899599989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778778	2542318	2538717	278784	275301	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC1235.02	cph1	bio2	-	SPCC320.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.541221502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778779	2542318	2540998	278784	277514	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC3D6.05	cph1	ptp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45951737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778780	2542318	2543130	278784	279562	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC869.05c	cph1	SPAC869.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.142112252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778781	2542318	2541100	278784	277615	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC651.04	cph1	SPBC651.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.063320691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778782	2542318	2543066	278784	279499	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC343.12	cph1	rds1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.843249058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778783	2542318	2540725	278784	277248	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC215.14c	cph1	vps20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.830060927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778784	2542318	2538756	278784	275339	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC1795.10c	cph1	SPCC1795.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.371720007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778785	2542318	2541531	278784	278031	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC25A8.01c	cph1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.560878091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778786	2542318	2540346	278784	276875	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC2F12.03c	cph1	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.591589962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778787	2542318	2539013	278784	275586	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC364.03	cph1	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444810861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778788	2542318	2540829	278784	277347	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC800.09	cph1	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.721107628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778789	2542318	2542418	278784	278881	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC1805.07c	cph1	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.21076991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778790	2542318	2541229	278784	277743	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC839.05c	cph1	rps1701	-	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197196374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778791	2542318	2540677	278784	277202	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC21B10.03c	cph1	ath1	-	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.500060719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778792	2542318	2543437	278784	279857	SPAC16C9.05	SPAPB1A10.14	cph1	pof15	-	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.253812279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778793	2542318	2543427	278784	279847	SPAC16C9.05	SPAPB1A10.15	cph1	arv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.685530218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778794	2542318	2539668	278784	276223	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC11B10.10c	cph1	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.543226519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778795	2542318	2541380	278784	277891	SPAC16C9.05	SPBPB2B2.13	cph1	gal1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.899059273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778796	2542318	2543602	278784	280017	SPAC16C9.05	SPAPB1A11.04c	cph1	mca1	-	SPAPB1A11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.143217459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778797	2542318	2540516	278784	277044	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC21C3.01c	cph1	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.969929138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778798	2542318	2540267	278784	276798	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC32C12.03c	cph1	ppk25	-	kin2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.49956444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778799	2542318	2542262	278784	278731	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC17C9.10	cph1	stm1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.80089269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778800	2542318	2540555	278784	277082	SPAC16C9.05	SPBP16F5.02	cph1	mcs2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.739208478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778801	2542318	2540936	278784	277452	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC800.05c	cph1	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.078323708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778802	2542318	2539928	278784	276472	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC1604.08c	cph1	imp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.392264162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778803	2542318	2543044	278784	279479	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC3C7.12	cph1	tip1	-	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.590563876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778804	2542318	2539736	278784	276288	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC12C2.12c	cph1	glo1	-	SPBC21D10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325972869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778805	2542318	2543516	278784	279934	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC4F10.11	cph1	spn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.620682757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778806	2542318	2539170	278784	275741	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC306.02c	cph1	SPCC306.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.375036511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778807	2542318	2539205	278784	275775	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC4B3.15	cph1	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.681251078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778808	2542318	2540278	278784	276809	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC1A4.04	cph1	SPBC1A4.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868422237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778809	2542318	2539920	278784	276464	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC119.08	cph1	pmk1	-	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8049031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778810	2542318	2539375	278784	275941	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC4G3.11	cph1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.03307164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778811	2542318	2542186	278784	278661	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC17C9.14	cph1	SPAC17C9.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.085852389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778812	2542318	2539189	278784	275760	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC1682.16	cph1	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.420449247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778813	2542318	2541084	278784	277599	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC649.02	cph1	rps1902	-	rps19|rps19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.639433914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778814	2542318	2543337	278784	279760	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC959.08	cph1	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.140553471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778815	2542318	2541398	278784	277907	SPAC16C9.05	SPBPB2B2.11	cph1	SPBPB2B2.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.989859667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778816	2542318	2539037	278784	275610	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC330.07c	cph1	SPCC330.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810639235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778817	2542318	2539169	278784	275740	SPAC16C9.05	SPCC1235.11	cph1	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.837793788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778818	2542318	2542716	278784	279169	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC25H1.07	cph1	emc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.418432509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778819	2542318	3361165	278784	280241	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC1348.12	cph1	SPBC1348.12	-	SPAC1348.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.763452117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778820	2542318	2539700	278784	276253	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC1685.15c	cph1	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.83007968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778821	2542318	2539959	278784	276503	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC1703.11	cph1	SPBC1703.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.121555942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778822	2542318	2541774	278784	278268	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC22E12.05c	cph1	rer1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.411198832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778823	2542318	2543387	278784	279809	SPAC16C9.05	SPAPB1E7.02c	cph1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.975268068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778824	2542318	2543070	278784	279503	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC2H10.02c	cph1	SPAC2H10.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.113261558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778825	2542318	2540558	278784	277085	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC2D10.17	cph1	clr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.614980395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778826	2542318	2540481	278784	277009	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC2D10.12	cph1	rhp23	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780464621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778827	2542318	2539743	278784	276295	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC16A3.08c	cph1	oga1	-	SPBC16A3.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.376978069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778828	2542318	2542424	278784	278886	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC1805.14	cph1	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.677993038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778829	2542318	2542700	278784	279153	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC26H5.08c	cph1	bgl2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.895413056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778830	2542318	2543372	278784	279794	SPAC16C9.05	SPAPB1A10.09	cph1	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.05645542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778831	2542318	2543333	278784	279756	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC694.02	cph1	SPAC694.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.134513209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778832	2542318	2543090	278784	279523	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC1348.01	cph1	SPBC1348.01	-	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.901703805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778833	2542318	2540309	278784	276839	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC21B10.13c	cph1	yox1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384410476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778834	2542318	2542943	278784	279384	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC1348.03	cph1	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.210737562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778835	2542318	2543616	278784	280030	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC4A8.09c	cph1	cwf21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.552407254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778836	2540660	2540415	277185	276943	SPBC21.06c	SPBC30B4.06c	cdc7	SPBC30B4.06c	its10|pld1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.932048481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778837	2540660	2543387	277185	279809	SPBC21.06c	SPAPB1E7.02c	cdc7	mcl1	its10|pld1	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.068344854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778838	2540610	2539165	277136	275736	SPBC21C3.19	SPCC1281.04	SPBC21C3.19	SPCC1281.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099978181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778839	2540610	2542701	277136	279154	SPBC21C3.19	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC21C3.19	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036915231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778840	2540610	2539168	277136	275739	SPBC21C3.19	SPCC1620.08	SPBC21C3.19	SPCC1620.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571050638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778841	2542192	2542598	278667	279052	SPAC9G1.12	SPAC6G10.08	cpd1	idp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816964299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778842	2542192	2541512	278667	278013	SPAC9G1.12	SPAC11E3.08c	cpd1	nse6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870040621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778843	2542192	2541818	278667	278309	SPAC9G1.12	SPAC11G7.02	cpd1	pub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504780543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778844	2542192	2542643	278667	279097	SPAC9G1.12	SPAC2C4.07c	cpd1	dis32	-	SPAC2C4.07c|dis3L2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.055608644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778845	2542192	2541438	278667	277943	SPAC9G1.12	SPAC23G3.10c	cpd1	ssr3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930863075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778846	2542192	2541497	278667	277999	SPAC9G1.12	SPAC7D4.13c	cpd1	SPAC7D4.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699247421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778847	2542192	2542107	278667	278583	SPAC9G1.12	SPAC30.01c	cpd1	sec72	-	sec7b|sec702	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700900941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778848	2542192	2539913	278667	276457	SPAC9G1.12	SPBC11G11.03	cpd1	mrt4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.43620503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778849	2542192	2543453	278667	279873	SPAC9G1.12	SPAC3G9.03	cpd1	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.768422006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778850	2542192	2541530	278667	278030	SPAC9G1.12	SPAC57A10.10c	cpd1	sla1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.019090633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778851	2542192	2542318	278667	278784	SPAC9G1.12	SPAC16C9.05	cpd1	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.777420476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778852	2542192	2539129	278667	275701	SPAC9G1.12	SPCC338.14	cpd1	ado1	-	SPCC338.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.550759902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778853	2542192	2541311	278667	277823	SPAC9G1.12	SPBP8B7.09c	cpd1	los1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.431360017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778854	2542192	2539574	278667	276134	SPAC9G1.12	SPCPB16A4.04c	cpd1	trm8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.870214905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778855	2542192	2540964	278667	277480	SPAC9G1.12	SPBC365.16	cpd1	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.557205341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778856	2542192	2542950	278667	279390	SPAC9G1.12	SPAC12B10.03	cpd1	bun62	-	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.84925275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778857	2542192	2542596	278667	279050	SPAC9G1.12	SPAC1B3.17	cpd1	clr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.127304973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778858	2542192	2542964	278667	279404	SPAC9G1.12	SPAC12G12.07c	cpd1	SPAC12G12.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.145075458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778859	2542192	2539628	278667	276185	SPAC9G1.12	SPBC1604.03c	cpd1	SPBC1604.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256168179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778860	2542192	2542652	278667	279106	SPAC9G1.12	SPAC1687.15	cpd1	gsk3	-	skp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812909584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778861	2542192	2543412	278667	279834	SPAC9G1.12	SPAC637.07	cpd1	moe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640899019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778862	2542192	2541578	278667	278075	SPAC9G1.12	SPAC25B8.05	cpd1	deg1	-	SPAC25B8.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852454625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778863	2542192	2539484	278667	276047	SPAC9G1.12	SPCC594.04c	cpd1	SPCC594.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.41059097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778864	2542192	2539603	278667	276161	SPAC9G1.12	SPBC1289.06c	cpd1	ppr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506808887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778865	2542192	2541929	278667	278417	SPAC9G1.12	SPAC23C4.12	cpd1	hhp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317983607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778866	2542192	2543643	278667	280057	SPAC9G1.12	SPAC3G9.07c	cpd1	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379879037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778867	2542192	2540801	278667	277320	SPAC9G1.12	SPBC18H10.10c	cpd1	saf4	-	cwc16|cwf16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.185181133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778868	2542192	2540997	278667	277513	SPAC9G1.12	SPBC3H7.06c	cpd1	pof9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988728598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778869	2542192	2539974	278667	276518	SPAC9G1.12	SPBC32H8.07	cpd1	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573486231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778870	2542192	2542214	278667	278688	SPAC9G1.12	SPACUNK4.11c	cpd1	mpp6	-	SPACUNK4.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924752922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778871	2542192	2539408	278667	275973	SPAC9G1.12	SPCC576.12c	cpd1	mhf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.441532332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778872	2542192	2541536	278667	278036	SPAC9G1.12	SPAC1071.02	cpd1	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.124121477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778873	2542192	2541708	278667	278203	SPAC9G1.12	SPAC31A2.02	cpd1	trm112	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197235108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778874	2542192	2540442	278667	276970	SPAC9G1.12	SPBC25B2.04c	cpd1	mtg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.916915037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778875	2542192	2541156	278667	277671	SPAC9G1.12	SPBC685.07c	cpd1	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.902627199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778876	2542192	2543051	278667	279486	SPAC9G1.12	SPAC1071.08	cpd1	rpp203	-	rla6|rpp2-3|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.840748701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778877	2542192	2542883	278667	279328	SPAC9G1.12	SPAC1486.04c	cpd1	alm1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092981986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778878	2542192	2539246	278667	275816	SPAC9G1.12	SPCC18.13	cpd1	SPCC18.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.924494226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778879	2542192	2540604	278667	277130	SPAC9G1.12	SPBC25D12.05	cpd1	trm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.129189795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778880	2542192	2540346	278667	276875	SPAC9G1.12	SPBC2F12.03c	cpd1	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.260799365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778881	2542192	2539013	278667	275586	SPAC9G1.12	SPCC364.03	cpd1	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.201609453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778882	2542192	2543128	278667	279560	SPAC9G1.12	SPAC3F10.06c	cpd1	rit1	-	SPAC3F10.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.186405224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778883	2542192	2539668	278667	276223	SPAC9G1.12	SPBC11B10.10c	cpd1	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776278158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778884	2542192	2538861	278667	275441	SPAC9G1.12	SPCC1620.11	cpd1	nup97	-	mug87	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388617129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778885	2542192	2539531	278667	276093	SPAC9G1.12	SPCC576.02	cpd1	SPCC576.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923964715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778886	2542192	2543087	278667	279520	SPAC9G1.12	SPAC30C2.04	cpd1	SPAC30C2.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.157112773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778887	2542192	2543333	278667	279756	SPAC9G1.12	SPAC694.02	cpd1	SPAC694.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256672483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778888	2542192	2541236	278667	277750	SPAC9G1.12	SPBC887.11	cpd1	pus2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.129794608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778889	2541052	2538961	277567	275535	SPBC409.12c	SPCC285.14	stn1	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.076546929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778890	2541052	2542816	277567	279263	SPBC409.12c	SPAC4G8.11c	stn1	atp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.50338574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778891	2541052	2542669	277567	279122	SPBC409.12c	SPAC29B12.08	stn1	clr5	-	SPAC29B12.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.739386074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778892	2541052	2542165	277567	278641	SPBC409.12c	SPAC1782.08c	stn1	rex3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.314325418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778893	2541052	2542845	277567	279291	SPBC409.12c	SPAC824.04	stn1	SPAC824.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577536009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778894	2541052	2540797	277567	277316	SPBC409.12c	SPBC18H10.11c	stn1	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.315136967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778895	2541052	2539733	277567	276285	SPBC409.12c	SPBC16E9.12c	stn1	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323323341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778896	2541052	2541496	277567	277998	SPBC409.12c	SPAC23D3.09	stn1	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440390291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778897	2541052	2540997	277567	277513	SPBC409.12c	SPBC3H7.06c	stn1	pof9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.492075919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778898	2541052	2538841	277567	275422	SPBC409.12c	SPCC550.03c	stn1	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507645037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778899	2541052	2543443	277567	279863	SPBC409.12c	SPAC3H1.12c	stn1	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.435729457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778900	2541052	2543011	277567	279449	SPBC409.12c	SPAC10F6.11c	stn1	atg17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851206757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778901	2541052	2543254	277567	279682	SPBC409.12c	SPAC1006.03c	stn1	red1	-	iss3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325605861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778902	2541052	2542806	277567	279254	SPBC409.12c	SPAC1610.01	stn1	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783315319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778903	2541052	2543420	277567	279842	SPBC409.12c	SPAC3H1.04c	stn1	mdm31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.853256403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778904	2541349	2539050	277860	275623	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC11E10.08	air1	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.911416867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778905	2541349	2541475	277860	277977	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC24B11.09	air1	mpc2	-	SPAC24B11.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.91738524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778906	2541349	2538961	277860	275535	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC285.14	air1	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258765288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778907	2541349	2542577	277860	279033	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC19G12.15c	air1	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.28404794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778908	2541349	2542066	277860	278543	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC227.05	air1	SPAC227.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.300036805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778909	2541349	2538977	277860	275551	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC1020.06c	air1	tal1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384539617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778910	2541349	2540131	277860	276668	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC1778.05c	air1	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.935159636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778911	2541349	2538993	277860	275567	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC162.12	air1	tco89	-	SPCC1753.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769024402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778912	2541349	2541130	277860	277645	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC776.11	air1	rpl2801	-	rpl28-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.334341669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778913	2541349	2540686	277860	277211	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC21D10.10	air1	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.276226989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778914	2541349	2539890	277860	276436	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC16C6.03c	air1	SPBC16C6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.021356821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778915	2541349	2540664	277860	277189	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC215.02	air1	bob1	-	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.045723484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778916	2541349	2541361	277860	277872	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBP8B7.10c	air1	utp16	-	SPBP8B7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.001990642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778917	2541349	2543156	277860	279587	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAP8A3.13c	air1	SPAP8A3.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.847582083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778918	2541349	2539434	277860	275997	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC757.09c	air1	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.21106826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778919	2541349	2539937	277860	276481	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC1539.08	air1	arf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.350278348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778920	2541349	2542022	277860	278505	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC23A1.03	air1	apt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77344412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778921	2541349	2542135	277860	278611	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC13A11.04c	air1	ubp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704022302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778922	2541349	2542318	277860	278784	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC16C9.05	air1	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.601845665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778923	2541349	2543685	277860	280099	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC3C7.03c	air1	rad55	-	rhp55	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813920944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778924	2541349	2540595	277860	277121	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC21C3.02c	air1	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64663199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778925	2541349	2539244	277860	275814	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC1672.06c	air1	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.696794353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778926	2541349	2538906	277860	275483	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC1259.03	air1	rpa12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201852563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778927	2541349	2540825	277860	277343	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC428.08c	air1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391813546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778928	2541349	2540964	277860	277480	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC365.16	air1	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.12327064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778929	2541349	2539310	277860	275877	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC285.17	air1	spp27	-	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379696836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778930	2541349	2542268	277860	278737	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC17A5.07c	air1	ulp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.921260985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778931	2541349	2538770	277860	275353	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC1753.02c	air1	git3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439430024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778932	2541349	2540338	277860	276867	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC2G2.13c	air1	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57361294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778933	2541349	2539990	277860	276534	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC1289.14	air1	SPBC1289.14	-	SPBC8E4.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318203634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778934	2541349	2542544	277860	279001	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC18G6.10	air1	lem2	-	heh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.903598687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778935	2541349	2543412	277860	279834	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC637.07	air1	moe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.352393047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778936	2541349	2539484	277860	276047	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC594.04c	air1	SPCC594.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.915259531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778937	2541349	2541496	277860	277998	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC23D3.09	air1	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.918743175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778938	2541349	2542857	277860	279303	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC144.06	air1	apl5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154133027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778939	2541349	2541739	277860	278233	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC2G11.10c	air1	SPAC2G11.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.981595005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778940	2541349	2538769	277860	275352	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC126.04c	air1	sgf73	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.500659207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778941	2541349	2542032	277860	278514	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC23C11.04c	air1	pnk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.567229978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778942	2541349	2540836	277860	277354	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC18H10.19	air1	vps38	-	atg14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987757345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778943	2541349	2543378	277860	279800	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC3H8.07c	air1	pac10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.2272838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778944	2541349	2542254	277860	278724	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC30D11.04c	air1	nup124	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.454485467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778945	2541349	2542214	277860	278688	SPBP35G2.08c	SPACUNK4.11c	air1	mpp6	-	SPACUNK4.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.652640064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778946	2541349	2541009	277860	277524	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC428.04	air1	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516411386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778947	2541349	2540990	277860	277506	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC36B7.06c	air1	mug20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.344140924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778948	2541349	2543443	277860	279863	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC3H1.12c	air1	snt2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.9236909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778949	2541349	2541536	277860	278036	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC1071.02	air1	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.695141601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778950	2541349	2540599	277860	277125	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC29A3.10c	air1	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448311965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778951	2541349	2538848	277860	275429	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC613.12c	air1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325469141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778952	2541349	2542869	277860	279314	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC140.02	air1	gar2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.406755755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778953	2541349	2540743	277860	277266	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC215.06c	air1	SPBC215.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.401970679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778954	2541349	2539538	277860	276100	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC364.06	air1	nap1	-	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506690819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778955	2541349	2540619	277860	277145	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC25H2.15	air1	SPBC25H2.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320824293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778956	2541349	2543106	277860	279538	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC3A11.13	air1	SPAC3A11.13	-	SPAC3H5.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.1593892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778957	2541349	2542883	277860	279328	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC1486.04c	air1	alm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.186645984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778958	2541349	2543304	277860	279728	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC6B12.12	air1	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.146811123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778959	2541349	2543160	277860	279591	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC31A2.14	air1	bun107	-	wdr48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927531521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778960	2541349	2543662	277860	280076	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC9.07c	air1	SPAC9.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442641905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778961	2541349	2540699	277860	277223	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC800.08	air1	gcd10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811732166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778962	2541349	2540555	277860	277082	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBP16F5.02	air1	mcs2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704841795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778963	2541349	2539375	277860	275941	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC4G3.11	air1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.200171704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778964	2541349	2543337	277860	279760	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC959.08	air1	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.687650056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778965	2541349	2543384	277860	279806	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC637.06	air1	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.614784681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778966	2541349	2540173	277860	276706	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC106.13	air1	SPBC106.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634928826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778967	2541349	2543087	277860	279520	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC30C2.04	air1	SPAC30C2.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195176627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778968	2541349	2541050	277860	277565	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC428.05c	air1	arg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.195628422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778969	2541349	2543333	277860	279756	SPBP35G2.08c	SPAC694.02	air1	SPAC694.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04338277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778970	2541349	2538947	277860	275521	SPBP35G2.08c	SPCC1682.12c	air1	ubp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773225538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778971	2541349	2541576	277860	278073	SPBP35G2.08c	SPBC1348.02	air1	SPBC1348.02	-	SPAC1348.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450881616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778972	2538973	3361210	275547	280286	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPBC16E9.16c	SPCPB16A4.02c	lsd90	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.838144037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778973	2538973	2538961	275547	275535	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPCC285.14	SPCPB16A4.02c	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.326183731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778974	2538973	2542577	275547	279033	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPAC19G12.15c	SPCPB16A4.02c	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51040325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778975	2538973	2540105	275547	276642	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPBC106.04	SPCPB16A4.02c	ada1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.02403127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778976	2538973	2543617	275547	280031	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPAC4A8.10	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPAC4A8.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.198249371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778977	2538973	2541912	275547	278402	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPAC222.16c	SPCPB16A4.02c	csn3	-	SPAC821.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.810139672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778978	2538973	2541117	275547	277632	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPBC646.13	SPCPB16A4.02c	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.991996212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778979	2538973	2540029	275547	276573	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPBC16A3.01	SPCPB16A4.02c	spn3	-	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.624365461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778980	2538973	2543681	275547	280095	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPAC9.02c	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPAC9.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.698489007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778981	2538973	2542689	275547	279142	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPAC29B12.04	SPCPB16A4.02c	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504024956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778982	2538973	2541026	275547	277541	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPBC337.09	SPCPB16A4.02c	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.133966954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778983	2538973	2540463	275547	276991	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPBC2F12.15c	SPCPB16A4.02c	pfa3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390949014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778984	2538973	2542277	275547	278746	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCPB16A4.02c	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.695066207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778985	2538973	2539382	275547	275948	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPCC162.03	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPCC162.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510752884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778986	2538973	2540595	275547	277121	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPBC21C3.02c	SPCPB16A4.02c	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441833912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778987	2538973	2539003	275547	275577	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPCC1442.17c	SPCPB16A4.02c	ist1	-	SPCC285.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.514712604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778988	2538973	2540797	275547	277316	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPBC18H10.11c	SPCPB16A4.02c	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.902983241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778989	2538973	2542513	275547	278971	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPAC1952.05	SPCPB16A4.02c	gcn5	-	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643853124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778990	2538973	2539990	275547	276534	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPBC1289.14	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPBC1289.14	-	SPBC8E4.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.003396761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778991	2538973	2540886	275547	277403	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPBC4F6.10	SPCPB16A4.02c	vps901	-	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385432297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778992	2538973	2542168	275547	278643	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPAC17A5.16	SPCPB16A4.02c	ftp105	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.782334098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778993	2538973	2543250	275547	279678	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPAC3G9.15c	SPCPB16A4.02c	fcf2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092282163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778994	2538973	2540374	275547	276903	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPBC31F10.02	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPBC31F10.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378806354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778995	2538973	2540967	275547	277483	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.914452002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778996	2538973	2541281	275547	277794	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPBC902.04	SPCPB16A4.02c	rmn1	-	SPBC902.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443747149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778997	2538973	2539059	275547	275632	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPCC737.06c	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPCC737.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.915623521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778998	2538973	2540229	275547	276761	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPBC31F10.15c	SPCPB16A4.02c	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.404809806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
778999	2538973	2542829	275547	279276	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPAC13D6.02c	SPCPB16A4.02c	byr3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808474674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779000	2538973	2541488	275547	277990	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPAC227.17c	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.623072587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779001	2538973	2543411	275547	279833	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPAPB1A10.10c	SPCPB16A4.02c	ypt71	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392821407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779002	2538973	2541017	275547	277532	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPBC36.07	SPCPB16A4.02c	elp1	-	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.122800232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779003	2538973	2542881	275547	279326	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPAC13F5.03c	SPCPB16A4.02c	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.436774172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779004	2538973	2541816	275547	278307	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPAC22E12.01	SPCPB16A4.02c	pet3	-	SPAC22E12.01|SPAC890.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.766576697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779005	2538973	2539335	275547	275901	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPCC1450.16c	SPCPB16A4.02c	ptl1	-	SPCC1450.16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.633122902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779006	2538973	2538705	275547	275289	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPCC663.10	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPCC663.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.548303274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779007	2538973	2540278	275547	276809	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPBC1A4.04	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPBC1A4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.126082391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779008	2538973	2539583	275547	276142	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPCC777.04	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPCC777.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.56941914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779009	2538973	2541867	275547	278357	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCPB16A4.02c	sck2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503382341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779010	2538973	2543624	275547	280038	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPAC4D7.06c	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPAC4D7.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983541518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779011	2538973	2538822	275547	275403	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPCC1840.02c	SPCPB16A4.02c	bgs4	-	cwg1|orb11|pbr1|sph1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445805298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779012	2538973	2542551	275547	279008	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPAC1952.17c	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPAC1952.17c	-	SPAC890.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.772703857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779013	2538973	2539001	275547	275575	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPCC1494.08c	SPCPB16A4.02c	SPCC1494.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.917794141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779014	2540678	2543617	277203	280031	SPBC1A4.10c	SPAC4A8.10	pmc1	SPAC4A8.10	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981198156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779015	2540678	2541130	277203	277645	SPBC1A4.10c	SPBC776.11	pmc1	rpl2801	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	rpl28-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.380680162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779016	2540678	2539097	277203	275669	SPBC1A4.10c	SPCC757.04	pmc1	SPCC757.04	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641111517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779017	2540678	2541316	277203	277828	SPBC1A4.10c	SPBP19A11.02c	pmc1	SPBP19A11.02c	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929377941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779018	2540678	2542273	277203	278742	SPBC1A4.10c	SPAC17H9.13c	pmc1	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852051311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779019	2540678	2539935	277203	276479	SPBC1A4.10c	SPBC13G1.04c	pmc1	abh1	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	SPBC13G1.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379623948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779020	2540678	2542848	277203	279294	SPBC1A4.10c	SPAC9G1.03c	pmc1	rpl3001	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	rpl30|rpl30-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570039279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779021	2540678	2540692	277203	277217	SPBC1A4.10c	SPBC800.07c	pmc1	tsf1	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32588612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779022	2540678	2540425	277203	276953	SPBC1A4.10c	SPBC27.06c	pmc1	mgr2	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.837592845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779023	2540678	2542969	277203	279409	SPBC1A4.10c	SPAC4G8.10	pmc1	gos1	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813040148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779024	2540678	2539792	277203	276342	SPBC1A4.10c	SPBC1271.14	pmc1	SPBC1271.14	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.117754624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779025	2540678	2540467	277203	276995	SPBC1A4.10c	SPBC2G2.07c	pmc1	mug178	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325756922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779026	2540678	2540964	277203	277480	SPBC1A4.10c	SPBC365.16	pmc1	SPBC365.16	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.005524304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779027	2540678	2542568	277203	279024	SPBC1A4.10c	SPAC1952.02	pmc1	tma23	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.69990933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779028	2540678	2543144	277203	279576	SPBC1A4.10c	SPAC3F10.05c	pmc1	mug113	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.39230937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779029	2540678	2543593	277203	280008	SPBC1A4.10c	SPAC4G9.10	pmc1	arg3	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.354033634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779030	2540678	2542971	277203	279410	SPBC1A4.10c	SPAC105.02c	pmc1	SPAC105.02c	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.187892117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779031	2540678	2542659	277203	279112	SPBC1A4.10c	SPAC25B8.08	pmc1	SPAC25B8.08	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093074433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779032	2540678	2541943	277203	278430	SPBC1A4.10c	SPAC222.07c	pmc1	hri2	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19237109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779033	2540678	2541532	277203	278032	SPBC1A4.10c	SPAC2C4.15c	pmc1	ubx2	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	ucp13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.259125347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779034	2540678	2543396	277203	279818	SPBC1A4.10c	SPAC4D7.11	pmc1	dsc4	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.125956157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779035	2540678	2540326	277203	276856	SPBC1A4.10c	SPBC2G5.06c	pmc1	hmt2	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386943329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779036	2540678	2538873	277203	275452	SPBC1A4.10c	SPCC306.11	pmc1	SPCC306.11	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391084295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779037	2540678	2538880	277203	275459	SPBC1A4.10c	SPCC1393.09c	pmc1	SPCC1393.09c	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866303138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779038	2540678	2542254	277203	278724	SPBC1A4.10c	SPAC30D11.04c	pmc1	nup124	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.076731371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779039	2540678	2543443	277203	279863	SPBC1A4.10c	SPAC3H1.12c	pmc1	snt2	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.837830083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779040	2540678	2541144	277203	277659	SPBC1A4.10c	SPBC685.06	pmc1	rps001	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.914931815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779041	2540678	2541628	277203	278124	SPBC1A4.10c	SPAC110.02	pmc1	pds5	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927559435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779042	2540678	2542725	277203	279176	SPBC1A4.10c	SPAC3A12.10	pmc1	rpl2001	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.837597263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779043	2540678	2543391	277203	279813	SPBC1A4.10c	SPAC4G9.09c	pmc1	arg11	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.83693053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779044	2540678	2542769	277203	279219	SPBC1A4.10c	SPAC15A10.10	pmc1	mde6	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.625171653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779045	2540678	2539555	277203	276116	SPBC1A4.10c	SPCC4B3.08	pmc1	lsg1	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262918759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779046	2540678	2542915	277203	279357	SPBC1A4.10c	SPAC6C3.06c	pmc1	SPAC6C3.06c	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87654275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779047	2540678	2540998	277203	277514	SPBC1A4.10c	SPBC3D6.05	pmc1	ptp4	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.705268231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779048	2540678	2543136	277203	279568	SPBC1A4.10c	SPBC1348.07	pmc1	SPBC1348.07	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	SPAC1348.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922296886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779049	2540678	2540531	277203	277059	SPBC1A4.10c	SPBC23E6.08	pmc1	sat1	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.55572076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779050	2540678	2539359	277203	275925	SPBC1A4.10c	SPCC16C4.06c	pmc1	pus3	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	SPCC16C4.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.50469965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779051	2540678	2539668	277203	276223	SPBC1A4.10c	SPBC11B10.10c	pmc1	pht1	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321176695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779052	2540678	2539726	277203	276278	SPBC1A4.10c	SPBC13E7.08c	pmc1	leo1	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	SPBC13E7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.935241832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779053	2540678	2542442	277203	278904	SPBC1A4.10c	SPACUNK12.02c	pmc1	cmk1	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	CaMK-I|SPAC25D11.02C	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.978985822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779054	2540678	2538840	277203	275421	SPBC1A4.10c	SPCC736.07c	pmc1	SPCC736.07c	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049153356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779055	2540678	2543387	277203	279809	SPBC1A4.10c	SPAPB1E7.02c	pmc1	mcl1	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647244725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779056	2540678	2538854	277203	275435	SPBC1A4.10c	SPCP1E11.05c	pmc1	are2	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.441550665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779057	2540678	2543471	277203	279891	SPBC1A4.10c	SPAC513.07	pmc1	SPAC513.07	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318628116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779058	2540678	2539014	277203	275587	SPBC1A4.10c	SPCC18B5.05c	pmc1	SPCC18B5.05c	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.319747978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779059	2540678	2542104	277203	278580	SPBC1A4.10c	SPAC869.02c	pmc1	SPAC869.02c	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.683468105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779060	2540480	2543529	277008	279947	SPBC2A9.04c	SPAC4C5.02c	san1	ryh1	SPBC2A9.04c	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.991616082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779061	2540480	2542758	277008	279208	SPBC2A9.04c	SPAC15E1.02c	san1	SPAC15E1.02c	SPBC2A9.04c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389318161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779062	2540480	2539420	277008	275985	SPBC2A9.04c	SPCC970.07c	san1	raf2	SPBC2A9.04c	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983755373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779063	2540480	2542791	277008	279240	SPBC2A9.04c	SPAC167.04	san1	pam17	SPBC2A9.04c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.716566153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779064	2540480	2539237	277008	275807	SPBC2A9.04c	SPCC24B10.13	san1	skb5	SPBC2A9.04c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.103211706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779065	2540480	2539898	277008	276444	SPBC2A9.04c	SPBC12D12.07c	san1	trx2	SPBC2A9.04c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852495451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779066	2540480	2539689	277008	276244	SPBC2A9.04c	SPBC1861.03	san1	mak10	SPBC2A9.04c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331128122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779067	2540480	2541961	277008	278448	SPBC2A9.04c	SPAC23C4.02	san1	crn1	SPBC2A9.04c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81236517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779068	2540480	2542597	277008	279051	SPBC2A9.04c	SPAP8A3.07c	san1	SPAP8A3.07c	SPBC2A9.04c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.511269658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779069	2540480	2540064	277008	276602	SPBC2A9.04c	SPBC1718.02	san1	hop1	SPBC2A9.04c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.838071739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779070	2540480	2539205	277008	275775	SPBC2A9.04c	SPCC4B3.15	san1	mid1	SPBC2A9.04c	dmf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877032579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779071	2540480	2541238	277008	277752	SPBC2A9.04c	SPBC8E4.05c	san1	SPBC8E4.05c	SPBC2A9.04c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864138002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779072	2541535	2540161	278035	276696	SPAC12G12.10	SPBC13E7.03c	wdr21	SPBC13E7.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814507131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779073	2541535	2541408	278035	277916	SPAC12G12.10	SPBPB2B2.14c	wdr21	SPBPB2B2.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.186751105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779074	2541535	2538847	278035	275428	SPAC12G12.10	SPCC594.06c	wdr21	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.019929564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779075	2541535	2543681	278035	280095	SPAC12G12.10	SPAC9.02c	wdr21	SPAC9.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.446368781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779076	2541535	2538801	278035	275382	SPAC12G12.10	SPCC285.13c	wdr21	nup60	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036326177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779077	2541535	2542300	278035	278767	SPAC12G12.10	SPAC1687.22c	wdr21	puf3	-	SPAC222.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.006852421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779078	2541535	2540964	278035	277480	SPAC12G12.10	SPBC365.16	wdr21	SPBC365.16	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.561468105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779079	2541535	2542177	278035	278652	SPAC12G12.10	SPAC17H9.08	wdr21	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811235959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779080	2541535	2543643	278035	280057	SPAC12G12.10	SPAC3G9.07c	wdr21	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.993527538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779081	2541535	2541899	278035	278389	SPAC12G12.10	SPAC22E12.11c	wdr21	set3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042526858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779082	2541535	2540326	278035	276856	SPAC12G12.10	SPBC2G5.06c	wdr21	hmt2	-	cad1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.878079713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779083	2541535	2539974	278035	276518	SPAC12G12.10	SPBC32H8.07	wdr21	git5	-	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.409374089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779084	2541535	2540325	278035	276855	SPAC12G12.10	SPBC21B10.10	wdr21	rps402	-	rps4-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152982013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779085	2541535	2541404	278035	277913	SPAC12G12.10	SPBPB2B2.18	wdr21	SPBPB2B2.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32749279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779086	2541535	2542303	278035	278770	SPAC12G12.10	SPAC1687.21	wdr21	SPAC1687.21	-	SPAC222.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714147391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779087	2541653	2541408	278149	277916	SPAC11D3.07c	SPBPB2B2.14c	toe4	SPBPB2B2.14c	SPAC11D3.07c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.257351786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779088	2541653	2538847	278149	275428	SPAC11D3.07c	SPCC594.06c	toe4	SPCC594.06c	SPAC11D3.07c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699543078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779089	2541653	2542816	278149	279263	SPAC11D3.07c	SPAC4G8.11c	toe4	atp10	SPAC11D3.07c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.064315157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779090	2541653	2543159	278149	279590	SPAC11D3.07c	SPAC3C7.09	toe4	set8	SPAC11D3.07c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.204327923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779091	2541653	2540595	278149	277121	SPAC11D3.07c	SPBC21C3.02c	toe4	dep1	SPAC11D3.07c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390336272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779092	2541653	2542695	278149	279148	SPAC11D3.07c	SPAC12B10.09	toe4	pet801	SPAC11D3.07c	SPAC12B10.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.848460623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779093	2541653	2538811	278149	275392	SPAC11D3.07c	SPCC330.03c	toe4	SPCC330.03c	SPAC11D3.07c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875623669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779094	2541653	2541892	278149	278382	SPAC11D3.07c	SPAP27G11.02	toe4	SPAP27G11.02	SPAC11D3.07c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8417712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779095	2541653	2542971	278149	279410	SPAC11D3.07c	SPAC105.02c	toe4	SPAC105.02c	SPAC11D3.07c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099007739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779096	2541653	2542297	278149	278764	SPAC11D3.07c	SPAC17H9.06c	toe4	SPAC17H9.06c	SPAC11D3.07c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869544778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779097	2541653	2539689	278149	276244	SPAC11D3.07c	SPBC1861.03	toe4	mak10	SPAC11D3.07c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445719329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779098	2541653	2540086	278149	276624	SPAC11D3.07c	SPBC16H5.12c	toe4	SPBC16H5.12c	SPAC11D3.07c	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388195942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779099	2541653	2542874	278149	279319	SPAC11D3.07c	SPAC20H4.09	toe4	SPAC20H4.09	SPAC11D3.07c	SPAC145.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045296194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779100	2541653	2538945	278149	275519	SPAC11D3.07c	SPCC1739.06c	toe4	SPCC1739.06c	SPAC11D3.07c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983052772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779101	2541653	2539815	278149	276365	SPAC11D3.07c	SPBC1105.02c	toe4	lys4	SPAC11D3.07c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.920091525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779102	2541653	2542867	278149	279312	SPAC11D3.07c	SPAC343.16	toe4	lys2	SPAC11D3.07c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448569287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779103	2541653	2540926	278149	277442	SPAC11D3.07c	SPBC359.06	toe4	mug14	SPAC11D3.07c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.93296929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779104	2541653	2540930	278149	277446	SPAC11D3.07c	SPBC354.10	toe4	def1	SPAC11D3.07c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.41080698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779105	2541653	2542769	278149	279219	SPAC11D3.07c	SPAC15A10.10	toe4	mde6	SPAC11D3.07c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32631294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779106	2541653	2540211	278149	276744	SPAC11D3.07c	SPBC947.15c	toe4	nde1	SPAC11D3.07c	SPBC947.15c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.122782725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779107	2541653	2541404	278149	277913	SPAC11D3.07c	SPBPB2B2.18	toe4	SPBPB2B2.18	SPAC11D3.07c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.262904448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779108	2541653	2542303	278149	278770	SPAC11D3.07c	SPAC1687.21	toe4	SPAC1687.21	SPAC11D3.07c	SPAC222.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387321909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779109	2541653	2543019	278149	279455	SPAC11D3.07c	SPAC57A10.03	toe4	cyp1	SPAC11D3.07c	cyp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783077307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779110	2541653	3361481	278149	280557	SPAC11D3.07c	SPAPB24D3.05c	toe4	SPAPB24D3.05c	SPAC11D3.07c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925636109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779111	2541653	2541646	278149	278142	SPAC11D3.07c	SPAC750.06c	toe4	SPAC750.06c	SPAC11D3.07c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317257834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779112	2541653	2541080	278149	277595	SPAC11D3.07c	SPBC557.04	toe4	ppk29	SPAC11D3.07c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923279558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779113	2541653	2543090	278149	279523	SPAC11D3.07c	SPBC1348.01	toe4	SPBC1348.01	SPAC11D3.07c	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.254523526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779114	2541653	2540067	278149	276605	SPAC11D3.07c	SPBC16H5.05c	toe4	cyp7	SPAC11D3.07c	cwf27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.18935745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779115	2542175	2542207	278650	278682	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC17H9.10c	mkh1	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.196841316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779116	2542175	2539147	278650	275719	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC622.12c	mkh1	gdh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.039723974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779117	2542175	2540060	278650	276598	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC106.01	mkh1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.402891134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779118	2542175	2542577	278650	279033	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC19G12.15c	mkh1	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317837297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779119	2542175	2540105	278650	276642	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC106.04	mkh1	ada1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.683631024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779120	2542175	2542598	278650	279052	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC6G10.08	mkh1	idp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.2962985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779121	2542175	2542518	278650	278976	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC1B3.16c	mkh1	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382546249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779122	2542175	2542143	278650	278619	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC17C9.07	mkh1	alg8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807902812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779123	2542175	2540913	278650	277429	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC56F2.08c	mkh1	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.139459809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779124	2542175	2540026	278650	276570	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC16D10.08c	mkh1	hsp104	-	SPBC16D10.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.008829245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779125	2542175	2539156	278650	275728	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC1450.08c	mkh1	wtf16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.194952068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779126	2542175	2539582	278650	276141	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC594.07c	mkh1	bqt3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.935694864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779127	2542175	2543575	278650	279990	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC644.13c	mkh1	SPAC644.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819864215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779128	2542175	2540524	278650	277052	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC21B10.08c	mkh1	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.468553878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779129	2542175	2542293	278650	278761	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC17G8.14c	mkh1	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.614032773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779130	2542175	2539035	278650	275608	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC794.09c	mkh1	tef101	-	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.849722086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779131	2542175	2539202	278650	275773	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC162.10	mkh1	ppk33	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.439045391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779132	2542175	2539939	278650	276483	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC11G11.01	mkh1	fis1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.970101229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779133	2542175	2539068	278650	275640	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC1442.11c	mkh1	SPCC1442.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.947453803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779134	2542175	2541117	278650	277632	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC646.13	mkh1	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.064783056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779135	2542175	5802945	278650	858083	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC19G12.16c	mkh1	adg2	-	SPAC23A1.01c|mug46	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511013086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779136	2542175	2540686	278650	277211	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC21D10.10	mkh1	bdc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.296605925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779137	2542175	2541082	278650	277597	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC577.11	mkh1	SPBC577.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387964025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779138	2542175	2540579	278650	277105	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC28E12.02	mkh1	SPBC28E12.02	-	SPBC9B6.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.251381221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779139	2542175	2540535	278650	277062	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC215.01	mkh1	SPBC215.01	-	SPBC3B9.20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581605668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779140	2542175	2540975	278650	277491	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC354.12	mkh1	gpd3	-	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.410589481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779141	2542175	2539420	278650	275985	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC970.07c	mkh1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1281013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779142	2542175	2541200	278650	277714	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC8D2.03c	mkh1	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.341160135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779143	2542175	2542677	278650	279130	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC26F1.10c	mkh1	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.895215538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779144	2542175	2542273	278650	278742	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC17H9.13c	mkh1	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.870241069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779145	2542175	2542641	278650	279095	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC24C9.15c	mkh1	spn5	-	mde9|meu28	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.571288436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779146	2542175	2543156	278650	279587	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAP8A3.13c	mkh1	SPAP8A3.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44412182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779147	2542175	2539463	278650	276026	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC550.11	mkh1	SPCC550.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.299401802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779148	2542175	2540029	278650	276573	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC16A3.01	mkh1	spn3	-	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.111795993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779149	2542175	2543043	278650	279478	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC3F10.13	mkh1	ucp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.812537654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779150	2542175	2542724	278650	279175	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC767.01c	mkh1	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.185181441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779151	2542175	2543453	278650	279873	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC3G9.03	mkh1	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.634963966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779152	2542175	2541026	278650	277541	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC337.09	mkh1	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.951205499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779153	2542175	2539575	278650	276135	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCP20C8.02c	mkh1	SPCP20C8.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.698548266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779154	2542175	2543048	278650	279483	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC3F10.02c	mkh1	trk1	-	sptrk	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.211518842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779155	2542175	2542165	278650	278641	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC1782.08c	mkh1	rex3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.326288809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779156	2542175	2542189	278650	278664	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC17A5.09c	mkh1	glc9	-	SPAC17A5.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.191982037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779157	2542175	2541428	278650	277933	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC14C4.11	mkh1	SPAC14C4.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992085657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779158	2542175	2541311	278650	277823	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBP8B7.09c	mkh1	los1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633482839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779159	2542175	2543108	278650	279540	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC3A12.13c	mkh1	SPAC3A12.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.570165853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779160	2542175	2539648	278650	276203	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC1198.08	mkh1	SPBC1198.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645850287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779161	2542175	2539961	278650	276505	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC1198.09	mkh1	ubc16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.981916864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779162	2542175	2538927	278650	275503	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC1795.09	mkh1	yps1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329582192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779163	2542175	2541416	278650	277923	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBCPT2R1.01c	mkh1	SPBCPT2R1.01c	-	SPBPB2B2.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.921793591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779164	2542175	2542373	278650	278837	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC1805.06c	mkh1	hem2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811495987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779165	2542175	2538972	278650	275546	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC1739.15	mkh1	wtf21	-	wtf3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.840960771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779166	2542175	2539381	278650	275947	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC1739.10	mkh1	mug33	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.774222388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779167	2542175	2539092	278650	275664	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC1259.08	mkh1	SPCC1259.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.195643267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779168	2542175	2542213	278650	278687	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC3G6.13c	mkh1	rpl4101	-	rpl41-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.018315279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779169	2542175	2542791	278650	279240	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC167.04	mkh1	pam17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.005926462	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779170	2542175	2540825	278650	277343	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC428.08c	mkh1	clr4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.535444502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779171	2542175	2540964	278650	277480	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC365.16	mkh1	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.007802479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779172	2542175	2542568	278650	279024	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC1952.02	mkh1	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.971599971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779173	2542175	2543573	278650	279988	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC869.11	mkh1	cat1	-	SPAC922.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.878679212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779174	2542175	2542311	278650	278777	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC16A10.05c	mkh1	dad1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.249391981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779175	2542175	2539051	278650	275624	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC1183.11	mkh1	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.564460435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779176	2542175	2538821	278650	275402	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC584.01c	mkh1	SPCC584.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.629334524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779177	2542175	2540797	278650	277316	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC18H10.11c	mkh1	ppr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992888084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779178	2542175	2541250	278650	277764	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC8D2.17	mkh1	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.613513685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779179	2542175	2542707	278650	279160	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC25G10.03	mkh1	zip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.253518421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779180	2542175	2541160	278650	277675	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC725.09c	mkh1	hob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.280077215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779181	2542175	3361491	278650	280567	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC1805.08	mkh1	dlc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.744696769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779182	2542175	2540922	278650	277438	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC36.10	mkh1	SPBC36.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515320937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779183	2542175	2543412	278650	279834	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC637.07	mkh1	moe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.41256169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779184	2542175	2540673	278650	277198	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC1D7.03	mkh1	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.139427808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779185	2542175	2540363	278650	276892	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC2F12.09c	mkh1	atf21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.163338612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779186	2542175	2540886	278650	277403	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC4F6.10	mkh1	vps901	-	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.483767327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779187	2542175	2542989	278650	279427	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC11E3.13c	mkh1	gas5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38340307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779188	2542175	2542921	278650	279362	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC1093.01	mkh1	ppr5	-	SPAC12B10.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.436668362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779189	2542175	2542357	278650	278822	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC1782.07	mkh1	qcr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775350823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779190	2542175	2540086	278650	276624	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC16H5.12c	mkh1	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.75386106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779191	2542175	2543250	278650	279678	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC3G9.15c	mkh1	fcf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.417358202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779192	2542175	2541187	278650	277701	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC776.14	mkh1	plh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329567881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779193	2542175	2538769	278650	275352	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC126.04c	mkh1	sgf73	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581736288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779194	2542175	2542032	278650	278514	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC23C11.04c	mkh1	pnk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.644228443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779195	2542175	2539000	278650	275574	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC1450.06c	mkh1	grx3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.538233878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779196	2542175	2540665	278650	277190	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC83.02c	mkh1	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.064651047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779197	2542175	2542710	278650	279163	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC750.08c	mkh1	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.691859569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779198	2542175	2538945	278650	275519	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC1739.06c	mkh1	SPCC1739.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.508138272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779199	2542175	2540290	278650	276821	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC29A3.02c	mkh1	his7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.621429448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779200	2542175	2539815	278650	276365	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC1105.02c	mkh1	lys4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.674983328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779201	2542175	2541248	278650	277762	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC8D2.10c	mkh1	rmt3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77682461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779202	2542175	2542549	278650	279006	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC19A8.11c	mkh1	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.839246196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779203	2542175	2541009	278650	277524	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC428.04	mkh1	apq12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193331592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779204	2542175	2543683	278650	280097	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAPB1E7.04c	mkh1	SPAPB1E7.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.873728714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779205	2542175	2538708	278650	275292	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC594.01	mkh1	SPCC594.01	-	SPCC736.16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.257473504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779206	2542175	2541142	278650	277657	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC725.04	mkh1	SPBC725.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574150729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779207	2542175	2538923	278650	275500	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC18.02	mkh1	SPCC18.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.443790541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779208	2542175	2541536	278650	278036	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC1071.02	mkh1	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514699722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779209	2542175	2540201	278650	276734	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC13A2.04c	mkh1	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.639236194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779210	2542175	2540342	278650	276871	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC2G2.01c	mkh1	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.631788729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779211	2542175	2541053	278650	277568	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC56F2.10c	mkh1	alg5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.47662797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779212	2542175	2540184	278650	276717	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC106.12c	mkh1	SPBC106.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.133585556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779213	2542175	2539427	278650	275992	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC663.15c	mkh1	SPCC663.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.97514546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779214	2542175	2541614	278650	278111	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC29A4.20	mkh1	elp3	-	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504123316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779215	2542175	2538690	278650	275275	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC1393.05	mkh1	ers1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.510873403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779216	2542175	2538884	278650	275462	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC1393.08	mkh1	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.808438225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779217	2542175	2539421	278650	275986	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC794.11c	mkh1	ent3	-	SPCC794.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.842550876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779218	2542175	2539213	278650	275783	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC285.10c	mkh1	SPCC285.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.491065454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779219	2542175	2541378	278650	277889	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBP8B7.21	mkh1	ubp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.49834406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779220	2542175	2540930	278650	277446	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC354.10	mkh1	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.475592831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779221	2542175	2541793	278650	278284	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC22H10.02	mkh1	SPAC22H10.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512555633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779222	2542175	2538848	278650	275429	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC613.12c	mkh1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.752704492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779223	2542175	2540643	278650	277168	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC19G7.06	mkh1	mbx1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.830797864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779224	2542175	2539595	278650	276153	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC965.14c	mkh1	SPCC965.14c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927691026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779225	2542175	2542875	278650	279320	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC13G7.02c	mkh1	ssa1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.912916132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779226	2542175	2540001	278650	276545	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC1289.13c	mkh1	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.320313875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779227	2542175	2542286	278650	278754	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC1786.01c	mkh1	ptl2	-	SPAC1786.01c|SPAC31G5.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.626147406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779228	2542175	2541175	278650	277689	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC839.13c	mkh1	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.625128476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779229	2542175	2539137	278650	275709	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC1682.08c	mkh1	mcp2	-	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.324642751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779230	2542175	2542883	278650	279328	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC1486.04c	mkh1	alm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.120640698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779231	2542175	2540779	278650	277298	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC19F8.06c	mkh1	meu22	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.691604539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779232	2542175	2543136	278650	279568	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC1348.07	mkh1	SPBC1348.07	-	SPAC1348.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869571027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779233	2542175	2538962	278650	275536	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC965.13	mkh1	SPCC965.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.476984565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779234	2542175	2538714	278650	275298	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC330.11	mkh1	btb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.877915025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779235	2542175	2539013	278650	275586	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC364.03	mkh1	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.934303321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779236	2542175	2541229	278650	277743	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC839.05c	mkh1	rps1701	-	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.933744044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779237	2542175	2543437	278650	279857	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAPB1A10.14	mkh1	pof15	-	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327667302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779238	2542175	2540569	278650	277096	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC660.17c	mkh1	SPBC660.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512044908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779239	2542175	2540516	278650	277044	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC21C3.01c	mkh1	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503936551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779240	2542175	2541744	278650	278238	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC23A1.02c	mkh1	SPAC23A1.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.435210263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779241	2542175	2538694	278650	275279	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC191.09c	mkh1	gst1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.434617283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779242	2542175	2542838	278650	279284	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC13G7.11	mkh1	SPAC13G7.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571207309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779243	2542175	2540489	278650	277017	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC25H2.03	mkh1	SPBC25H2.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.202248121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779244	2542175	2540333	278650	276863	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC21B10.07	mkh1	SPBC21B10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.843050592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779245	2542175	2540380	278650	276909	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC1A4.05	mkh1	blt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.815859981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779246	2542175	2543525	278650	279943	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC4A8.14	mkh1	SPAC4A8.14	-	prs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.079964094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779247	2542175	5802702	278650	857840	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC1235.15	mkh1	dga1	-	SPCC548.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714136489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779248	2542175	2540551	278650	277078	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC23E6.01c	mkh1	cxr1	-	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.246675275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779249	2542175	2538792	278650	275373	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCP1E11.10	mkh1	SPCP1E11.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319055424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779250	2542175	2539169	278650	275740	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC1235.11	mkh1	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.764972113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779251	2542175	2541238	278650	277752	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC8E4.05c	mkh1	SPBC8E4.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.628952301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779252	2542175	2541357	278650	277868	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBPB7E8.01	mkh1	SPBPB7E8.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701797407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779253	2542175	2543384	278650	279806	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC637.06	mkh1	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.557576995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779254	2542175	2539440	278650	276003	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC550.08	mkh1	SPCC550.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.561372258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779255	2542175	2543372	278650	279794	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAPB1A10.09	mkh1	ase1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042870082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779256	2542175	2543333	278650	279756	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC694.02	mkh1	SPAC694.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778263263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779257	2542175	2543090	278650	279523	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC1348.01	mkh1	SPBC1348.01	-	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771806306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779258	2542175	2542561	278650	279017	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC31G5.17c	mkh1	rps1001	-	rps10-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.621320065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779259	2542175	2541576	278650	278073	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC1348.02	mkh1	SPBC1348.02	-	SPAC1348.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.740126979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779260	2542175	2540208	278650	276741	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC9B6.03	mkh1	SPBC9B6.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.970241391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779261	2542175	2541062	278650	277577	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC660.11	mkh1	tcg1	-	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.347906244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779262	2542175	2540734	278650	277257	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC19G7.09	mkh1	ulp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.834707169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779263	2542175	2542908	278650	279352	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC13G7.03	mkh1	upf3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388078088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779264	2542175	2540649	278650	277174	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC19F8.08	mkh1	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.190104951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779265	2542175	2538730	278650	275314	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC31H12.02c	mkh1	mug73	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.714598242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779266	2539379	2539774	275945	276325	SPCC188.02	SPBC17A3.10	par1	pas4	-	pi036	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.122450682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779267	2539379	2542207	275945	278682	SPCC188.02	SPAC17H9.10c	par1	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.734552669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779268	2539379	2540279	275945	276810	SPCC188.02	SPBC3B8.04c	par1	SPBC3B8.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514883229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779269	2539379	2542895	275945	279339	SPCC188.02	SPAC13G6.10c	par1	asl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.050799754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779270	2539379	2541902	275945	278392	SPCC188.02	SPAC27E2.07	par1	pvg2	-	mug53	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.611811372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779271	2539379	2541826	275945	278317	SPCC188.02	SPAC2G11.13	par1	atg22	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.940670518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779272	2539379	2543529	275945	279947	SPCC188.02	SPAC4C5.02c	par1	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.666788277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779273	2539379	2542598	275945	279052	SPCC188.02	SPAC6G10.08	par1	idp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.273110302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779274	2539379	2540913	275945	277429	SPCC188.02	SPBC56F2.08c	par1	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573264473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779275	2539379	2543306	275945	279730	SPCC188.02	SPAC56F8.14c	par1	mug115	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.771194842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779276	2539379	2541426	275945	277931	SPCC188.02	SPAC227.06	par1	SPAC227.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.507622161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779277	2539379	2541570	275945	278067	SPCC188.02	SPAC6G9.09c	par1	rpl2401	-	rpl24|rpl24-01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506736183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779278	2539379	2542812	275945	279259	SPCC188.02	SPAC6F6.01	par1	cch1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.201225449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779279	2539379	2541912	275945	278402	SPCC188.02	SPAC222.16c	par1	csn3	-	SPAC821.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.660683429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779280	2539379	2543064	275945	279497	SPCC188.02	SPAC3G6.01	par1	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.183299255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779281	2539379	2542671	275945	279124	SPCC188.02	SPAC824.09c	par1	SPAC824.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.408211942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779282	2539379	2542965	275945	279405	SPCC188.02	SPAC3G6.04	par1	rnp24	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991215228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779283	2539379	2540524	275945	277052	SPCC188.02	SPBC21B10.08c	par1	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.309761055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779284	2539379	2543592	275945	280007	SPCC188.02	SPAC4F10.18	par1	nup37	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377092311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779285	2539379	2539930	275945	276474	SPCC188.02	SPBC1198.11c	par1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.063783954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779286	2539379	2541130	275945	277645	SPCC188.02	SPBC776.11	par1	rpl2801	-	rpl28-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923204814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779287	2539379	2541723	275945	278217	SPCC188.02	SPAC22H12.01c	par1	mug35	-	SPAC23G3.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.80666133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779288	2539379	2542650	275945	279104	SPCC188.02	SPAC2C4.10c	par1	csc4	-	SPAC2C4.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.48920561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779289	2539379	2541104	275945	277619	SPCC188.02	SPBC6B1.03c	par1	SPBC6B1.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876082366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779290	2539379	2541117	275945	277632	SPCC188.02	SPBC646.13	par1	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.502470835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779291	2539379	2541681	275945	278177	SPCC188.02	SPAC14C4.01c	par1	SPAC14C4.01c	-	SPAC19D5.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.33552191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779292	2539379	2543652	275945	280066	SPCC188.02	SPAC4H3.03c	par1	SPAC4H3.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.460738173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779293	2539379	2542917	275945	279358	SPCC188.02	SPAC9E9.11	par1	plr1	-	plr	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.761011453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779294	2539379	2542701	275945	279154	SPCC188.02	SPAC26H5.05	par1	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.572180052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779295	2539379	2541771	275945	278265	SPCC188.02	SPAC23H3.06	par1	apl6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931742076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779296	2539379	2538922	275945	275499	SPCC188.02	SPCC16C4.10	par1	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.221273922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779297	2539379	2542103	275945	278579	SPCC188.02	SPAC31G5.11	par1	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.68097307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779298	2539379	2541457	275945	277960	SPCC188.02	SPAC6G10.10c	par1	SPAC6G10.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038502553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779299	2539379	2541082	275945	277597	SPCC188.02	SPBC577.11	par1	SPBC577.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.917251296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779300	2539379	2540491	275945	277019	SPCC188.02	SPBC28E12.04	par1	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.686622502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779301	2539379	2540455	275945	276983	SPCC188.02	SPBC215.05	par1	gpd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.347999116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779302	2539379	2542316	275945	278782	SPCC188.02	SPAC16C9.02c	par1	SPAC16C9.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.664396198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779303	2539379	3361436	275945	280512	SPCC188.02	SPAC1296.01c	par1	SPAC1296.01c	-	SPAC22F3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.066829929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779304	2539379	2543320	275945	279744	SPCC188.02	SPAPJ695.01c	par1	SPAPJ695.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842418774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779305	2539379	2540999	275945	277515	SPCC188.02	SPBC4B4.04	par1	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.711120578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779306	2539379	2539226	275945	275796	SPCC188.02	SPCC16C4.20c	par1	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328214984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779307	2539379	2541200	275945	277714	SPCC188.02	SPBC8D2.03c	par1	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.001395475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779308	2539379	2542677	275945	279130	SPCC188.02	SPAC26F1.10c	par1	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.698676774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779309	2539379	2541013	275945	277528	SPCC188.02	SPBC3H7.13	par1	far10	-	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.977034992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779310	2539379	2539970	275945	276514	SPCC188.02	SPBC1773.01	par1	far8	-	SPBC1773.01|csc3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.269906998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779311	2539379	2538847	275945	275428	SPCC188.02	SPCC594.06c	par1	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095152597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779312	2539379	2541058	275945	277573	SPCC188.02	SPBC3H7.09	par1	erf2	-	mug142	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.138714292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779313	2539379	2541498	275945	278000	SPCC188.02	SPAC227.10	par1	SPAC227.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922797966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779314	2539379	2539045	275945	275618	SPCC188.02	SPCC1235.05c	par1	fft2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.87155987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779315	2539379	2543288	275945	279713	SPCC188.02	SPAC6C3.03c	par1	SPAC6C3.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935025866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779316	2539379	2543260	275945	279688	SPCC188.02	SPAC1002.17c	par1	urg2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808554744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779317	2539379	2543590	275945	280005	SPCC188.02	SPAC4C5.03	par1	SPAC4C5.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.405553773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779318	2539379	2543681	275945	280095	SPCC188.02	SPAC9.02c	par1	SPAC9.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.147921752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779319	2539379	2542689	275945	279142	SPCC188.02	SPAC29B12.04	par1	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.832229805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779320	2539379	2540919	275945	277435	SPCC188.02	SPBC543.07	par1	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.773776656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779321	2539379	2539472	275945	276035	SPCC188.02	SPCC794.03	par1	SPCC794.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639563991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779322	2539379	2539434	275945	275997	SPCC188.02	SPCC757.09c	par1	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700466725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779323	2539379	2541964	275945	278450	SPCC188.02	SPAC2F3.08	par1	sut1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.256726005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779324	2539379	2541026	275945	277541	SPCC188.02	SPBC337.09	par1	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.890126814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779325	2539379	2541781	275945	278274	SPCC188.02	SPAC23G3.07c	par1	snf30	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922466966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779326	2539379	2540929	275945	277445	SPCC188.02	SPBC354.03	par1	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.460365527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779327	2539379	2541811	275945	278302	SPCC188.02	SPAC22A12.16	par1	SPAC22A12.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.420041061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779328	2539379	2540463	275945	276991	SPCC188.02	SPBC2F12.15c	par1	pfa3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.261539282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779329	2539379	2543029	275945	279465	SPCC188.02	SPAC11G7.01	par1	SPAC11G7.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.909044989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779330	2539379	2541831	275945	278322	SPCC188.02	SPAC23G3.03	par1	sib2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811865582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779331	2539379	2540425	275945	276953	SPCC188.02	SPBC27.06c	par1	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509836932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779332	2539379	2542135	275945	278611	SPCC188.02	SPAC13A11.04c	par1	ubp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.7855195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779333	2539379	2542969	275945	279409	SPCC188.02	SPAC4G8.10	par1	gos1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.294102912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779334	2539379	2543685	275945	280099	SPCC188.02	SPAC3C7.03c	par1	rad55	-	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3697306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779335	2539379	2539823	275945	276373	SPCC188.02	SPBC16A3.18	par1	cip1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.133129692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779336	2539379	2538823	275945	275404	SPCC188.02	SPCC18B5.02c	par1	SPCC18B5.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.802762407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779337	2539379	2540127	275945	276664	SPCC188.02	SPBC106.20	par1	exo70	-	SPBC582.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.322694635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779338	2539379	2540540	275945	277067	SPCC188.02	SPBC23E6.10c	par1	SPBC23E6.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.414950952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779339	2539379	2541522	275945	278023	SPCC188.02	SPAC23E2.01	par1	fep1	-	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.187883411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779340	2539379	2543426	275945	279846	SPCC188.02	SPAC631.02	par1	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.379557952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779341	2539379	2540023	275945	276567	SPCC188.02	SPBC11C11.10	par1	SPBC11C11.10	-	SPBC3B8.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873296488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779342	2539379	2542845	275945	279291	SPCC188.02	SPAC824.04	par1	SPAC824.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.839131713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779343	2539379	2542213	275945	278687	SPCC188.02	SPAC3G6.13c	par1	rpl4101	-	rpl41-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.263293731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779344	2539379	2541683	275945	278179	SPCC188.02	SPAC22G7.03	par1	SPAC22G7.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924936538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779345	2539379	2542558	275945	279014	SPCC188.02	SPAC1952.07	par1	rad1	-	rad19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.146615723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779346	2539379	2539051	275945	275624	SPCC188.02	SPCC1183.11	par1	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.65445534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779347	2539379	2542679	275945	279132	SPCC188.02	SPAC12B10.07	par1	acp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.624366519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779348	2539379	2541649	275945	278145	SPCC188.02	SPAC1F3.06c	par1	spo15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.771263318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779349	2539379	2539355	275945	275921	SPCC188.02	SPCC1840.08c	par1	pdi5	-	SPCC1840.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442342685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779350	2539379	2541353	275945	277864	SPCC188.02	SPBP35G2.11c	par1	SPBP35G2.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.330268271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779351	2539379	2541801	275945	278292	SPCC188.02	SPAC2F7.08c	par1	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767336872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779352	2539379	2541249	275945	277763	SPCC188.02	SPBC947.01	par1	alf1	-	SPBC947.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.40447453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779353	2539379	2541237	275945	277751	SPCC188.02	SPBC947.04	par1	pfl3	-	SPBC947.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.500281938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779354	2539379	2541250	275945	277764	SPCC188.02	SPBC8D2.17	par1	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.381821702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779355	2539379	2542513	275945	278971	SPCC188.02	SPAC1952.05	par1	gcn5	-	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.507572159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779356	2539379	2542863	275945	279309	SPCC188.02	SPAC13G7.04c	par1	mac1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.556745939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779357	2539379	2543593	275945	280008	SPCC188.02	SPAC4G9.10	par1	arg3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812984517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779358	2539379	2542707	275945	279160	SPCC188.02	SPAC25G10.03	par1	zip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.045228553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779359	2539379	2542652	275945	279106	SPCC188.02	SPAC1687.15	par1	gsk3	-	skp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.05764691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779360	2539379	2541160	275945	277675	SPCC188.02	SPBC725.09c	par1	hob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.522680512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779361	2539379	2540429	275945	276957	SPCC188.02	SPBC29A10.07	par1	pom152	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.642501663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779362	2539379	2540348	275945	276877	SPCC188.02	SPBC29A10.05	par1	exo1	-	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507422068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779363	2539379	2541038	275945	277553	SPCC188.02	SPBC29A10.01	par1	ccr1	-	SPBC365.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.544155165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779364	2539379	2540922	275945	277438	SPCC188.02	SPBC36.10	par1	SPBC36.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327446042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779365	2539379	2542507	275945	278965	SPCC188.02	SPAC18G6.13	par1	SPAC18G6.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512594357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779366	2539379	2539831	275945	276380	SPCC188.02	SPBC15C4.05	par1	dhx29	-	SPBC15C4.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385257023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779367	2539379	2540150	275945	276687	SPCC188.02	SPBC16E9.14c	par1	zrg17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.068337307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779368	2539379	2541889	275945	278379	SPCC188.02	SPAC2F7.03c	par1	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.259273609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779369	2539379	2542168	275945	278643	SPCC188.02	SPAC17A5.16	par1	ftp105	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.433462106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779370	2539379	2542989	275945	279427	SPCC188.02	SPAC11E3.13c	par1	gas5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640709901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779371	2539379	2543531	275945	279949	SPCC188.02	SPAC926.06c	par1	SPAC926.06c	-	lrr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815017935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779372	2539379	2539484	275945	276047	SPCC188.02	SPCC594.04c	par1	SPCC594.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923339466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779373	2539379	2541496	275945	277998	SPCC188.02	SPAC23D3.09	par1	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.560047369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779374	2539379	2543667	275945	280081	SPCC188.02	SPAC4H3.02c	par1	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701698832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779375	2539379	2542877	275945	279322	SPCC188.02	SPAC13G6.15c	par1	SPAC13G6.15c	-	SPAC24B11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.85210058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779376	2539379	2539689	275945	276244	SPCC188.02	SPBC1861.03	par1	mak10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.73578366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779377	2539379	2543245	275945	279673	SPCC188.02	SPAC56F8.06c	par1	alg10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.93002081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779378	2539379	2539857	275945	276404	SPCC188.02	SPBC1604.20c	par1	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.908104818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779379	2539379	2543101	275945	279533	SPCC188.02	SPAC323.03c	par1	SPAC323.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.633331612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779380	2539379	2541899	275945	278389	SPCC188.02	SPAC22E12.11c	par1	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.451651902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779381	2539379	2540831	275945	277349	SPCC188.02	SPBC428.02c	par1	eca39	-	SPBC582.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.83557482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779382	2539379	2542857	275945	279303	SPCC188.02	SPAC144.06	par1	apl5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.383758146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779383	2539379	2541710	275945	278205	SPCC188.02	SPAC343.11c	par1	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.495597503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779384	2539379	2543396	275945	279818	SPCC188.02	SPAC4D7.11	par1	dsc4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.05554158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779385	2539379	2542409	275945	278873	SPCC188.02	SPAC17G8.10c	par1	dma1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.414412764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779386	2539379	2539667	275945	276222	SPCC188.02	SPBC13G1.08c	par1	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.836037696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779387	2539379	2540665	275945	277190	SPCC188.02	SPBC83.02c	par1	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.35799357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779388	2539379	2540628	275945	277154	SPCC188.02	SPBC25B2.08	par1	SPBC25B2.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983975407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779389	2539379	2542014	275945	278497	SPCC188.02	SPAC20H4.04	par1	fml2	-	mfh2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929842026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779390	2539379	2540997	275945	277513	SPCC188.02	SPBC3H7.06c	par1	pof9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.715647158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779391	2539379	2540961	275945	277477	SPCC188.02	SPBC36B7.03	par1	sec63	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.125616666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779392	2539379	2539850	275945	276398	SPCC188.02	SPBC15D4.07c	par1	atg9	-	apg9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.022713873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779393	2539379	2541720	275945	278214	SPCC188.02	SPAC23H3.13c	par1	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.336599745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779394	2539379	2539958	275945	276502	SPCC188.02	SPBC1718.07c	par1	zfs1	-	moc4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.49297236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779395	2539379	2538935	275945	275511	SPCC188.02	SPCC1682.11c	par1	ctl1	-	SPCC1682.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.939091931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779396	2539379	2542254	275945	278724	SPCC188.02	SPAC30D11.04c	par1	nup124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.313899681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779397	2539379	2541900	275945	278390	SPCC188.02	SPAC23H4.17c	par1	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.557337422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779398	2539379	2543301	275945	279726	SPCC188.02	SPAC977.17	par1	SPAC977.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.299618385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779399	2539379	2542549	275945	279006	SPCC188.02	SPAC19A8.11c	par1	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.027999026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779400	2539379	2542519	275945	278977	SPCC188.02	SPAC19G12.08	par1	scs7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.503790669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779401	2539379	2543522	275945	279940	SPCC188.02	SPAPB24D3.08c	par1	SPAPB24D3.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982878913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779402	2539379	2542055	275945	278534	SPCC188.02	SPAC6G9.03c	par1	mug183	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.161079431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779403	2539379	2540990	275945	277506	SPCC188.02	SPBC36B7.06c	par1	mug20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.26703214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779404	2539379	2543119	275945	279551	SPCC188.02	SPAC3A11.07	par1	nde2	-	SPAC3A11.07	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.263359423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779405	2539379	2540019	275945	276563	SPCC188.02	SPBC1685.01	par1	pmp1	-	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.167266974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779406	2539379	2542125	275945	278601	SPCC188.02	SPAP8A3.03	par1	SPAP8A3.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87668155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779407	2539379	2542008	275945	278491	SPCC188.02	SPAC2G11.07c	par1	ptc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.044614541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779408	2539379	2543224	275945	279652	SPCC188.02	SPAPB8E5.10	par1	SPAPB8E5.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387758686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779409	2539379	2540342	275945	276871	SPCC188.02	SPBC2G2.01c	par1	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.356544856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779410	2539379	2539402	275945	275967	SPCC188.02	SPCC613.03	par1	SPCC613.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569494049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779411	2539379	2542597	275945	279051	SPCC188.02	SPAP8A3.07c	par1	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.512472813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779412	2539379	2541296	275945	277808	SPCC188.02	SPBP8B7.06	par1	rpp201	-	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.554079881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779413	2539379	2543390	275945	279812	SPCC188.02	SPAC631.01c	par1	acp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.631364847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779414	2539379	2539711	275945	276264	SPCC188.02	SPBC1683.09c	par1	frp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.817744763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779415	2539379	2541680	275945	278176	SPCC188.02	SPAC22F8.09	par1	rrp16	-	nop53	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05015351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779416	2539379	2539421	275945	275986	SPCC188.02	SPCC794.11c	par1	ent3	-	SPCC794.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.01212178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779417	2539379	2541488	275945	277990	SPCC188.02	SPAC227.17c	par1	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.214284995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779418	2539379	2543477	275945	279897	SPCC188.02	SPAPB2B4.04c	par1	SPAPB2B4.04c	-	pmc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.186940475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779419	2539379	2543049	275945	279484	SPCC188.02	SPAC1296.04	par1	mug65	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097797525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779420	2539379	2543515	275945	279933	SPCC188.02	SPAC4F10.14c	par1	btf3	-	btt1|egd1|nac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.803123545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779421	2539379	2540703	275945	277227	SPCC188.02	SPBC20F10.07	par1	SPBC20F10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.394588243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779422	2539379	2541793	275945	278284	SPCC188.02	SPAC22H10.02	par1	SPAC22H10.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.919296553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779423	2539379	2542748	275945	279198	SPCC188.02	SPAC15A10.09c	par1	pun1	-	SPAC15A10.09c|sur7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.870449298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779424	2539379	2540643	275945	277168	SPCC188.02	SPBC19G7.06	par1	mbx1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.080309831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779425	2539379	2542869	275945	279314	SPCC188.02	SPAC140.02	par1	gar2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577468589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779426	2539379	2541144	275945	277659	SPCC188.02	SPBC685.06	par1	rps001	-	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.975923469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779427	2539379	2541762	275945	278256	SPCC188.02	SPAC139.01c	par1	SPAC139.01c	-	SPAC955.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.314405658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779428	2539379	2542725	275945	279176	SPCC188.02	SPAC3A12.10	par1	rpl2001	-	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.914866292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779429	2539379	2542283	275945	278751	SPCC188.02	SPAC27F1.08	par1	pdt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.396155691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779430	2539379	2543113	275945	279545	SPCC188.02	SPAC3F10.07c	par1	erf4	-	mug91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.266810868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779431	2539379	2540706	275945	277229	SPCC188.02	SPBC19C7.12c	par1	omh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.557161917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779432	2539379	2541156	275945	277671	SPCC188.02	SPBC685.07c	par1	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.162949226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779433	2539379	2542759	275945	279209	SPCC188.02	SPAC9G1.07	par1	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.830651529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779434	2539379	2539101	275945	275673	SPCC188.02	SPCC736.04c	par1	gma12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.858199533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779435	2539379	2541287	275945	277800	SPCC188.02	SPBP22H7.05c	par1	abo2	-	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982642935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779436	2539379	2543619	275945	280033	SPCC188.02	SPAC4F10.04	par1	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.184029308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779437	2539379	2541175	275945	277689	SPCC188.02	SPBC839.13c	par1	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.430404057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779438	2539379	2540061	275945	276599	SPCC188.02	SPBC119.12	par1	rud3	-	SPBC119.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.438089802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779439	2539379	2540779	275945	277298	SPCC188.02	SPBC19F8.06c	par1	meu22	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.915226835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779440	2539379	2542621	275945	279075	SPCC188.02	SPAC5H10.05c	par1	SPAC5H10.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930558248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779441	2539379	2540800	275945	277319	SPCC188.02	SPBC409.20c	par1	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.052409254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779442	2539379	2543304	275945	279728	SPCC188.02	SPAC6B12.12	par1	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92747854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779443	2539379	2540464	275945	276992	SPCC188.02	SPBC23E6.02	par1	rrp2	-	SPBC23E6.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389239664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779444	2539379	2543096	275945	279528	SPCC188.02	SPAC977.05c	par1	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.748535551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779445	2539379	2540531	275945	277059	SPCC188.02	SPBC23E6.08	par1	sat1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.003170994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779446	2539379	2541432	275945	277937	SPCC188.02	SPAC1F5.05c	par1	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.684334061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779447	2539379	2539707	275945	276260	SPCC188.02	SPBC17F3.01c	par1	rga5	-	SPBC557.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.304896646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779448	2539379	2543066	275945	279499	SPCC188.02	SPAC343.12	par1	rds1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.790854642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779449	2539379	2540725	275945	277248	SPCC188.02	SPBC215.14c	par1	vps20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.032566955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779450	2539379	2543368	275945	279790	SPCC188.02	SPAC630.06c	par1	SPAC630.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.458138752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779451	2539379	2540000	275945	276544	SPCC188.02	SPBC1683.13c	par1	cha4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.226767125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779452	2539379	2540325	275945	276855	SPCC188.02	SPBC21B10.10	par1	rps402	-	rps4-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.824244429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779453	2539379	2538916	275945	275493	SPCC188.02	SPCC16C4.17	par1	mug123	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.975114453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779454	2539379	2543457	275945	279877	SPCC188.02	SPAC3H1.03	par1	mug151	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930320493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779455	2539379	2542051	275945	278530	SPCC188.02	SPAC23C11.06c	par1	SPAC23C11.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.408775535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779456	2539379	2541149	275945	277664	SPCC188.02	SPBC651.03c	par1	gyp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.370880911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779457	2539379	2543091	275945	279524	SPCC188.02	SPAC12G12.15	par1	sif3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.939544459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779458	2539379	2543427	275945	279847	SPCC188.02	SPAPB1A10.15	par1	arv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.062954361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779459	2539379	2539668	275945	276223	SPCC188.02	SPBC11B10.10c	par1	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.276517797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779460	2539379	2543420	275945	279842	SPCC188.02	SPAC3H1.04c	par1	mdm31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.962456485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779461	2539379	2542891	275945	279335	SPCC188.02	SPAC6F12.12	par1	par2	-	pbp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.361299298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779462	2539379	2542341	275945	278807	SPCC188.02	SPAC16E8.17c	par1	SPAC16E8.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330133378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779463	2539379	2542262	275945	278731	SPCC188.02	SPAC17C9.10	par1	stm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714831479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779464	2539379	2543046	275945	279481	SPCC188.02	SPAC3C7.10	par1	pex13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.841566827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779465	2539379	3361476	275945	280552	SPCC188.02	SPAC16A10.04	par1	rho4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.765762311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779466	2539379	2542838	275945	279284	SPCC188.02	SPAC13G7.11	par1	SPAC13G7.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.412226507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779467	2539379	2543516	275945	279934	SPCC188.02	SPAC4F10.11	par1	spn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.464122103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779468	2539379	3361511	275945	280587	SPCC188.02	SPAC23C4.08	par1	rho3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.249927429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779469	2539379	2540278	275945	276809	SPCC188.02	SPBC1A4.04	par1	SPBC1A4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.31680014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779470	2539379	2539920	275945	276464	SPCC188.02	SPBC119.08	par1	pmk1	-	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454308622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779471	2539379	2543124	275945	279556	SPCC188.02	SPAC3A11.06	par1	mvp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327945847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779472	2539379	2540146	275945	276683	SPCC188.02	SPBC17A3.06	par1	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.885176158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779473	2539379	2540504	275945	277032	SPCC188.02	SPBC24C6.10c	par1	dip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.055568562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779474	2539379	2541645	275945	278141	SPCC188.02	SPAC1527.03	par1	SPAC1527.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.768673921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779475	2539379	2543387	275945	279809	SPCC188.02	SPAPB1E7.02c	par1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.853697811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779476	2539379	2543327	275945	279750	SPCC188.02	SPAC1D4.06c	par1	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.067502841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779477	2539379	2541627	275945	278123	SPCC188.02	SPAC1F5.08c	par1	yam8	-	ehs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.633074164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779478	2539379	2538854	275945	275435	SPCC188.02	SPCP1E11.05c	par1	are2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.61638139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779479	2539379	2542886	275945	279331	SPCC188.02	SPAC1486.01	par1	SPAC1486.01	-	sod2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813687275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779480	2539379	2543087	275945	279520	SPCC188.02	SPAC30C2.04	par1	SPAC30C2.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.337872722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779481	2539379	2542175	275945	278650	SPCC188.02	SPAC1F3.02c	par1	mkh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.340216935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779482	2539379	2543070	275945	279503	SPCC188.02	SPAC2H10.02c	par1	SPAC2H10.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043197942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779483	2539379	2542424	275945	278886	SPCC188.02	SPAC1805.14	par1	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641958076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779484	2539379	2541491	275945	277993	SPCC188.02	SPAC2C4.16c	par1	rps801	-	rps8|rps8-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04085453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779485	2539379	2542460	275945	278921	SPCC188.02	SPAC1F12.03c	par1	SPAC1F12.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.497700222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779486	2539379	2540383	275945	276912	SPCC188.02	SPBC31E1.02c	par1	pmr1	-	cps5|pgak2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.486307052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779487	2539379	2542656	275945	279110	SPCC188.02	SPAC2E1P3.05c	par1	SPAC2E1P3.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506785274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779488	2539379	2540309	275945	276839	SPCC188.02	SPBC21B10.13c	par1	yox1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321885347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779489	2539379	2541272	275945	277786	SPCC188.02	SPBC947.03c	par1	naa38	-	mak31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.124807852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779490	2539379	2541529	275945	278029	SPCC188.02	SPAC1687.13c	par1	csn5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092902356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779491	2539379	2542094	275945	278571	SPCC188.02	SPAC29B12.06c	par1	rcd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.375763113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779492	2539379	2542617	275945	279071	SPCC188.02	SPAC13A11.01c	par1	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.211015385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779493	2539379	2543501	275945	279919	SPCC188.02	SPAC664.14	par1	amt2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988762968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779494	2539379	2541062	275945	277577	SPCC188.02	SPBC660.11	par1	tcg1	-	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6226263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779495	2539379	2540787	275945	277306	SPCC188.02	SPBC1921.07c	par1	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.850503048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779496	2539379	2539494	275945	276057	SPCC188.02	SPCC4G3.08	par1	psk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.509973478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779497	2539379	2539001	275945	275575	SPCC188.02	SPCC1494.08c	par1	SPCC1494.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.282679808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779498	2539379	2541893	275945	278383	SPCC188.02	SPAC23H4.13c	par1	SPAC23H4.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.922881296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779499	2539412	2540886	275977	277403	SPCC737.07c	SPBC4F6.10	SPCC737.07c	vps901	-	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.843284183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779500	2539412	2539293	275977	275861	SPCC737.07c	SPCC553.08c	SPCC737.07c	ria1	-	SPCC553.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.885500187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779501	2539412	2542829	275977	279276	SPCC737.07c	SPAC13D6.02c	SPCC737.07c	byr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.191261834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779502	2539412	2541156	275977	277671	SPCC737.07c	SPBC685.07c	SPCC737.07c	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576700381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779503	2539412	2540325	275977	276855	SPCC737.07c	SPBC21B10.10	SPCC737.07c	rps402	-	rps4-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.271335378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779504	2539925	2538939	276469	275514	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC1672.04c	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC1672.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.615597235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779505	2539925	2539050	276469	275623	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC16H5.13	rik1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.96676896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779506	2539925	2539147	276469	275719	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC622.12c	SPBC16H5.13	gdh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769981343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779507	2539925	2541495	276469	277997	SPBC16H5.13	SPAP8A3.02c	SPBC16H5.13	ofd2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816709519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779508	2539925	2541902	276469	278392	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC27E2.07	SPBC16H5.13	pvg2	-	mug53	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.808905092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779509	2539925	2538721	276469	275305	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC1494.10	SPBC16H5.13	adn3	-	SPCC70.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.405509825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779510	2539925	2542862	276469	279308	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC140.03	SPBC16H5.13	arb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.052472965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779511	2539925	2540060	276469	276598	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC106.01	SPBC16H5.13	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.124700401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779512	2539925	2539151	276469	275723	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC1235.12c	SPBC16H5.13	mug146	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.507058872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779513	2539925	2538961	276469	275535	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC285.14	SPBC16H5.13	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.976841206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779514	2539925	2542577	276469	279033	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC19G12.15c	SPBC16H5.13	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.774271775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779515	2539925	2542080	276469	278557	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC27D7.03c	SPBC16H5.13	mei2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770239665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779516	2539925	2542066	276469	278543	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC227.05	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC227.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.406542229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779517	2539925	2541426	276469	277931	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC227.06	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC227.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.232741389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779518	2539925	2538977	276469	275551	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC1020.06c	SPBC16H5.13	tal1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.31722689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779519	2539925	2540131	276469	276668	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC1778.05c	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.508913967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779520	2539925	2543575	276469	279990	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC644.13c	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC644.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.193931957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779521	2539925	2539301	276469	275869	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC622.03c	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC622.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.9216667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779522	2539925	2543677	276469	280091	SPBC16H5.13	SPAPB1E7.05	SPBC16H5.13	gde1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145838012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779523	2539925	2539930	276469	276474	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC16H5.13	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.746455006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779524	2539925	2541585	276469	278082	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC16H5.13	man1	-	heh2|mug61	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934789361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779525	2539925	2541117	276469	277632	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC646.13	SPBC16H5.13	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.326972455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779526	2539925	2543594	276469	280009	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC8F11.05c	SPBC16H5.13	mug130	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986349056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779527	2539925	2541497	276469	277999	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC7D4.13c	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC7D4.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.14756231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779528	2539925	2539800	276469	276350	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC1347.13c	SPBC16H5.13	mrm1	-	SPBC1347.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145676173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779529	2539925	2541457	276469	277960	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC6G10.10c	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC6G10.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098706031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779530	2539925	2538710	276469	275294	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC16H5.13	xap5	-	SPCC14G10.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.890993181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779531	2539925	2540455	276469	276983	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC215.05	SPBC16H5.13	gpd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148843949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779532	2539925	2540535	276469	277062	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC215.01	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC215.01	-	SPBC3B9.20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.01266567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779533	2539925	2540664	276469	277189	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC215.02	SPBC16H5.13	bob1	-	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.864235244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779534	2539925	3361436	276469	280512	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC1296.01c	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC1296.01c	-	SPAC22F3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.192890859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779535	2539925	2541891	276469	278381	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC1F8.03c	SPBC16H5.13	str3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510527472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779536	2539925	2541361	276469	277872	SPBC16H5.13	SPBP8B7.10c	SPBC16H5.13	utp16	-	SPBP8B7.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.88753154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779537	2539925	2541208	276469	277722	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC887.04c	SPBC16H5.13	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.738150199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779538	2539925	2542677	276469	279130	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC16H5.13	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.596558011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779539	2539925	2539735	276469	276287	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC1773.04	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC1773.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154646576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779540	2539925	2543590	276469	280005	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC4C5.03	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC4C5.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.766633003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779541	2539925	2543681	276469	280095	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC9.02c	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC9.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325074505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779542	2539925	2542724	276469	279175	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC767.01c	SPBC16H5.13	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.880302321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779543	2539925	2542848	276469	279294	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC9G1.03c	SPBC16H5.13	rpl3001	-	rpl30|rpl30-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512902145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779544	2539925	2539434	276469	275997	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC757.09c	SPBC16H5.13	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.623697992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779545	2539925	2543453	276469	279873	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC3G9.03	SPBC16H5.13	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.412865175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779546	2539925	2539331	276469	275897	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC24B10.09	SPBC16H5.13	rps1702	-	rps17|rps17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572849404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779547	2539925	2541026	276469	277541	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC337.09	SPBC16H5.13	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327273369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779548	2539925	2540220	276469	276753	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC337.03	SPBC16H5.13	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.295851097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779549	2539925	2540929	276469	277445	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC354.03	SPBC16H5.13	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.264629937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779550	2539925	2541346	276469	277857	SPBC16H5.13	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC16H5.13	ppm1	-	SPBP8B7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.55889453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779551	2539925	2541323	276469	277835	SPBC16H5.13	SPBP35G2.14	SPBC16H5.13	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.330591712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779552	2539925	2539365	276469	275931	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC24B10.16c	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC24B10.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812021137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779553	2539925	2543326	276469	279749	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC56F8.12	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC56F8.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981146737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779554	2539925	2541311	276469	277823	SPBC16H5.13	SPBP8B7.09c	SPBC16H5.13	los1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.061306579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779555	2539925	2543108	276469	279540	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC3A12.13c	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC3A12.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.987216849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779556	2539925	2541522	276469	278023	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC23E2.01	SPBC16H5.13	fep1	-	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.35993421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779557	2539925	2543584	276469	279999	SPBC16H5.13	SPAPB1E7.11c	SPBC16H5.13	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640244091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779558	2539925	2539352	276469	275918	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC188.07	SPBC16H5.13	ccq1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445655877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779559	2539925	2540415	276469	276943	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC30B4.06c	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC30B4.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200143598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779560	2539925	2538906	276469	275483	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC1259.03	SPBC16H5.13	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.022401313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779561	2539925	2542981	276469	279419	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC824.02	SPBC16H5.13	bst1	-	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.475262582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779562	2539925	2540893	276469	277409	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC543.10	SPBC16H5.13	get1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.631918987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779563	2539925	2539310	276469	275877	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC285.17	SPBC16H5.13	spp27	-	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391128101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779564	2539925	2543573	276469	279988	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC869.11	SPBC16H5.13	cat1	-	SPAC922.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.400718252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779565	2539925	2539023	276469	275596	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC594.05c	SPBC16H5.13	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.091400496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779566	2539925	2541885	276469	278375	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC22H10.03c	SPBC16H5.13	kap114	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.593033099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779567	2539925	2541664	276469	278160	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC2H10.01	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC2H10.01	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818528501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779568	2539925	2541353	276469	277864	SPBC16H5.13	SPBP35G2.11c	SPBC16H5.13	SPBP35G2.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205111456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779569	2539925	2541801	276469	278292	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC16H5.13	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.211163479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779570	2539925	2538715	276469	275299	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC1223.05c	SPBC16H5.13	rpl3702	-	rpl37|rpl37-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.814269087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779571	2539925	2541776	276469	278270	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC16H5.13	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.173068595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779572	2539925	2541264	276469	277778	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC902.06	SPBC16H5.13	mto2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.328747991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779573	2539925	2542105	276469	278581	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC14C4.15c	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC14C4.15c	-	SPAPJ760.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.514138009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779574	2539925	2541160	276469	277675	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC725.09c	SPBC16H5.13	hob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.298113947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779575	2539925	2539984	276469	276528	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC1289.11	SPBC16H5.13	spf38	-	cwf17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.936019598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779576	2539925	2541735	276469	278229	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC7D4.04	SPBC16H5.13	atg11	-	taf1|cvt9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.990482812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779577	2539925	2542464	276469	278925	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC1A6.09c	SPBC16H5.13	lag1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.035410196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779578	2539925	2539219	276469	275789	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC1795.01c	SPBC16H5.13	mad3	-	SPCC895.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.710971765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779579	2539925	2541943	276469	278430	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC222.07c	SPBC16H5.13	hri2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.478044599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779580	2539925	2542168	276469	278643	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC17A5.16	SPBC16H5.13	ftp105	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.871478099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779581	2539925	2541876	276469	278366	SPBC16H5.13	SPAP27G11.11c	SPBC16H5.13	SPAP27G11.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.413512408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779582	2539925	2541496	276469	277998	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC16H5.13	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380232609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779583	2539925	2541096	276469	277611	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC725.10	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC725.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.275475698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779584	2539925	2539857	276469	276404	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC16H5.13	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.012220674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779585	2539925	2543643	276469	280057	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC16H5.13	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.514731457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779586	2539925	2541899	276469	278389	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC16H5.13	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776092476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779587	2539925	2543396	276469	279818	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC16H5.13	dsc4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.257600915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779588	2539925	2539284	276469	275852	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC584.15c	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC584.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.843409337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779589	2539925	2539995	276469	276539	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC1105.09	SPBC16H5.13	ubc15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.565543722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779590	2539925	2539667	276469	276222	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC16H5.13	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.285084901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779591	2539925	2541830	276469	278321	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC5H10.01	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC5H10.01	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.407351798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779592	2539925	2542126	276469	278602	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC1B3.05	SPBC16H5.13	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.743350586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779593	2539925	2540665	276469	277190	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC83.02c	SPBC16H5.13	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714499647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779594	2539925	2542874	276469	279319	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC20H4.09	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC20H4.09	-	SPAC145.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810597787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779595	2539925	2538774	276469	275356	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC162.06c	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC162.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.502886803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779596	2539925	2542946	276469	279386	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC6F12.03c	SPBC16H5.13	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.813063611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779597	2539925	2540751	276469	277273	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC20F10.10	SPBC16H5.13	psl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.848795578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779598	2539925	2542976	276469	279414	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC9E9.09c	SPBC16H5.13	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.913700616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779599	2539925	2543178	276469	279608	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC31G5.15	SPBC16H5.13	psd3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98752806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779600	2539925	2540394	276469	276922	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC2D10.09	SPBC16H5.13	snr1	-	SPBC2D10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.919346353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779601	2539925	2543495	276469	279914	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC513.03	SPBC16H5.13	mfm2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386449797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779602	2539925	2540077	276469	276615	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC17D11.04c	SPBC16H5.13	nto1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.542929816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779603	2539925	2542254	276469	278724	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC30D11.04c	SPBC16H5.13	nup124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.352340083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779604	2539925	2540318	276469	276848	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC30B4.04c	SPBC16H5.13	sol1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505067988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779605	2539925	5802861	276469	857999	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC1D4.01	SPBC16H5.13	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.488263246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779606	2539925	2543080	276469	279513	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC3A11.10c	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC3A11.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.258795444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779607	2539925	2539424	276469	275989	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC622.19	SPBC16H5.13	jmj4	-	mug149	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.891955648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779608	2539925	2538824	276469	275405	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC1442.14c	SPBC16H5.13	hnt1	-	SPCC1442.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877459326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779609	2539925	2541389	276469	277900	SPBC16H5.13	SPBPB2B2.09c	SPBC16H5.13	SPBPB2B2.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.685330914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779610	2539925	2539317	276469	275883	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC16A11.08	SPBC16H5.13	atg20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575898818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779611	2539925	2539740	276469	276292	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC1685.04	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC1685.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.118724768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779612	2539925	2542125	276469	278601	SPBC16H5.13	SPAP8A3.03	SPBC16H5.13	SPAP8A3.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.410560798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779613	2539925	2542008	276469	278491	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC2G11.07c	SPBC16H5.13	ptc3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986731185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779614	2539925	2541053	276469	277568	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC56F2.10c	SPBC16H5.13	alg5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.119482485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779615	2539925	2542597	276469	279051	SPBC16H5.13	SPAP8A3.07c	SPBC16H5.13	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.047964496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779616	2539925	2541296	276469	277808	SPBC16H5.13	SPBP8B7.06	SPBC16H5.13	rpp201	-	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.324408062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779617	2539925	2539427	276469	275992	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC663.15c	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC663.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.839397793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779618	2539925	2542865	276469	279310	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC144.01	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC144.01	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930103545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779619	2539925	2542550	276469	279007	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC1B3.02c	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC1B3.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.838292187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779620	2539925	2538884	276469	275462	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC1393.08	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.379696982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779621	2539925	2539812	276469	276362	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC1347.02	SPBC16H5.13	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.524115563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779622	2539925	2542781	276469	279230	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC57A10.12c	SPBC16H5.13	ura3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57453514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779623	2539925	2539519	276469	276081	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC364.05	SPBC16H5.13	vps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.158472422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779624	2539925	2540703	276469	277227	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC20F10.07	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC20F10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.961395955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779625	2539925	3361526	276469	280602	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC664.15	SPBC16H5.13	caf4	-	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040759237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779626	2539925	2542625	276469	279079	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC24H6.11c	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC24H6.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.339097384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779627	2539925	2542725	276469	279176	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC3A12.10	SPBC16H5.13	rpl2001	-	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506853005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779628	2539925	2540821	276469	277339	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC800.03	SPBC16H5.13	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.757965947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779629	2539925	2541525	276469	278025	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC27D7.02c	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC27D7.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.342977793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779630	2539925	2542283	276469	278751	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC27F1.08	SPBC16H5.13	pdt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.721451216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779631	2539925	2539748	276469	276300	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC11C11.01	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC11C11.01	-	SPBC17D1.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709718127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779632	2539925	2538762	276469	275345	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC306.04c	SPBC16H5.13	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.762913517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779633	2539925	2543628	276469	280042	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC3H8.10	SPBC16H5.13	spo20	-	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.845660832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779634	2539925	2543619	276469	280033	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC4F10.04	SPBC16H5.13	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.76912744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779635	2539925	2542327	276469	278793	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC16C9.06c	SPBC16H5.13	upf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.686048642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779636	2539925	2541175	276469	277689	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC839.13c	SPBC16H5.13	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.361620926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779637	2539925	2543567	276469	279983	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC890.03	SPBC16H5.13	ppk16	-	mug92	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.029255344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779638	2539925	2543419	276469	279841	SPBC16H5.13	SPAPB24D3.02c	SPBC16H5.13	SPAPB24D3.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194776378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779639	2539925	2542883	276469	279328	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC16H5.13	alm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383608548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779640	2539925	2542881	276469	279326	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC13F5.03c	SPBC16H5.13	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.378725661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779641	2539925	2543304	276469	279728	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC16H5.13	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990268662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779642	2539925	2540998	276469	277514	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC3D6.05	SPBC16H5.13	ptp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.876829254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779643	2539925	2543096	276469	279528	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC977.05c	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447731023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779644	2539925	2541432	276469	277937	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC1F5.05c	SPBC16H5.13	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.260313012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779645	2539925	2540115	276469	276652	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC1778.02	SPBC16H5.13	rap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.010666516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779646	2539925	2541367	276469	277878	SPBC16H5.13	SPBP8B7.13	SPBC16H5.13	vac7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.989820548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779647	2539925	2538756	276469	275339	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC1795.10c	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC1795.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.402956852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779648	2539925	2541531	276469	278031	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC16H5.13	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.132739085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779649	2539925	2542355	276469	278820	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC29A4.13	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC29A4.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818538852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779650	2539925	2540304	276469	276834	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC354.13	SPBC16H5.13	rga6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778958019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779651	2539925	2540829	276469	277347	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC800.09	SPBC16H5.13	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.897224065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779652	2539925	2542418	276469	278881	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC16H5.13	dad2	-	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.569170147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779653	2539925	2543457	276469	279877	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC3H1.03	SPBC16H5.13	mug151	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.464113791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779654	2539925	2543377	276469	279799	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC3H1.07	SPBC16H5.13	aru1	-	car3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.714704115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779655	2539925	2540211	276469	276744	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC947.15c	SPBC16H5.13	nde1	-	SPBC947.15c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.446773038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779656	2539925	2543437	276469	279857	SPBC16H5.13	SPAPB1A10.14	SPBC16H5.13	pof15	-	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.436577474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779657	2539925	2541404	276469	277913	SPBC16H5.13	SPBPB2B2.18	SPBC16H5.13	SPBPB2B2.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.436988854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779658	2539925	2542303	276469	278770	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC1687.21	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC1687.21	-	SPAC222.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816792338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779659	2539925	2543109	276469	279541	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC3G6.09c	SPBC16H5.13	tps2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201128553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779660	2539925	2540667	276469	277192	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC211.06	SPBC16H5.13	gfh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040774456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779661	2539925	2543569	276469	279984	SPBC16H5.13	SPAPB24D3.03	SPBC16H5.13	SPAPB24D3.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.260162342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779662	2539925	2543380	276469	279802	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC4G9.16c	SPBC16H5.13	rpl901	-	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.258543305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779663	2539925	2540146	276469	276683	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.62864444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779664	2539925	2543072	276469	279505	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC3A12.09c	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC3A12.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819829717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779665	2539925	2538840	276469	275421	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC736.07c	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC736.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451228341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779666	2539925	2539178	276469	275749	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC1682.14	SPBC16H5.13	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.558621448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779667	2539925	2543337	276469	279760	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC959.08	SPBC16H5.13	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.295109528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779668	2539925	2541398	276469	277907	SPBC16H5.13	SPBPB2B2.11	SPBC16H5.13	SPBPB2B2.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988099495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779669	2539925	2543220	276469	279648	SPBC16H5.13	SPAPB21F2.02	SPBC16H5.13	SPAPB21F2.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779277952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779670	2539925	2539700	276469	276253	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC16H5.13	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392359727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779671	2539925	2543384	276469	279806	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC637.06	SPBC16H5.13	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.812296858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779672	2539925	2540108	276469	276645	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC13E7.11	SPBC16H5.13	rbd1	-	SPBC13E7.11|rh1|SPBC30D10.19c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871710985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779673	2539925	2541806	276469	278297	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC16H5.13	prz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.079850634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779674	2539925	2541774	276469	278268	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC22E12.05c	SPBC16H5.13	rer1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643196584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779675	2539925	2543327	276469	279750	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC1D4.06c	SPBC16H5.13	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7702431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779676	2539925	2543684	276469	280098	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC4G8.03c	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC4G8.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.461044486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779677	2539925	2542995	276469	279433	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC105.01c	SPBC16H5.13	kha1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925447978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779678	2539925	2540558	276469	277085	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC2D10.17	SPBC16H5.13	clr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.743182051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779679	2539925	2539743	276469	276295	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC16A3.08c	SPBC16H5.13	oga1	-	SPBC16A3.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980461507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779680	2539925	2543644	276469	280058	SPBC16H5.13	SPAPB1A10.03	SPBC16H5.13	nxt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983793176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779681	2539925	2541320	276469	277832	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC1271.03c	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC1271.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.35845817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779682	2539925	2543448	276469	279868	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC3H5.07	SPBC16H5.13	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.908919633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779683	2539925	2540383	276469	276912	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC31E1.02c	SPBC16H5.13	pmr1	-	cps5|pgak2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.201629674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779684	2539925	2542440	276469	278902	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC17A2.12	SPBC16H5.13	rrp1	-	SPAC17A2.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.844801876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779685	2539925	2539211	276469	275781	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC1739.08c	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC1739.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866998569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779686	2539925	2541124	276469	277639	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC646.02	SPBC16H5.13	cwf11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.800477335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779687	2539925	2541904	276469	278394	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC22F8.03c	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC22F8.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.876130421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779688	2539925	2541272	276469	277786	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC947.03c	SPBC16H5.13	naa38	-	mak31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.191632312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779689	2539925	2539599	276469	276157	SPBC16H5.13	SPCP31B10.02	SPBC16H5.13	SPCP31B10.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44538327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779690	2539925	3361512	276469	280588	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC3C7.01c	SPBC16H5.13	sac12	-	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.288365393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779691	2539925	2540320	276469	276850	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC3D6.04c	SPBC16H5.13	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.268876052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779692	2539925	2542908	276469	279352	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC13G7.03	SPBC16H5.13	upf3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779980467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779693	2539925	2539001	276469	275575	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC1494.08c	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC1494.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.626826321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779694	2539925	2540649	276469	277174	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC19F8.08	SPBC16H5.13	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329677392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779695	2542150	2541818	278626	278309	SPAC17A5.11	SPAC11G7.02	rec12	pub1	spo11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.543592414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779696	2542150	2540455	278626	276983	SPAC17A5.11	SPBC215.05	rec12	gpd1	spo11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.38053057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779697	2542150	2540595	278626	277121	SPAC17A5.11	SPBC21C3.02c	rec12	dep1	spo11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.571139566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779698	2542150	2543641	278626	280055	SPAC17A5.11	SPAC3H5.08c	rec12	SPAC3H5.08c	spo11	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046452603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779699	2542150	2538770	278626	275353	SPAC17A5.11	SPCC1753.02c	rec12	git3	spo11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63329825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779700	2542150	2540326	278626	276856	SPAC17A5.11	SPBC2G5.06c	rec12	hmt2	spo11	cad1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19680808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779701	2542150	2541401	278626	277910	SPAC17A5.11	SPBPB10D8.05c	rec12	SPBPB10D8.05c	spo11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388985148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779702	2542150	2538873	278626	275452	SPAC17A5.11	SPCC306.11	rec12	SPCC306.11	spo11	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042771435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779703	2542150	2541961	278626	278448	SPAC17A5.11	SPAC23C4.02	rec12	crn1	spo11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384160487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779704	2542150	2539421	278626	275986	SPAC17A5.11	SPCC794.11c	rec12	ent3	spo11	SPCC794.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.840151148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779705	2542150	2539812	278626	276362	SPAC17A5.11	SPBC1347.02	rec12	fkbp39	spo11	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.261523756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779706	2542150	2539519	278626	276081	SPAC17A5.11	SPCC364.05	rec12	vps3	spo11	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148034511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779707	2542150	2540531	278626	277059	SPAC17A5.11	SPBC23E6.08	rec12	sat1	spo11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700877632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779708	2542150	2540421	278626	276949	SPAC17A5.11	SPBC2D10.19c	rec12	alb1	spo11	SPBC2D10.19c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503524338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779709	2542150	2543602	278626	280017	SPAC17A5.11	SPAPB1A11.04c	rec12	mca1	spo11	SPAPB1A11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385864662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779710	2542150	2539460	278626	276023	SPAC17A5.11	SPCC4B3.13	rec12	SPCC4B3.13	spo11	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871358384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779711	2543341	2542862	279764	279308	SPAC8E11.07c	SPAC140.03	alp31	arb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329561036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779712	2543341	2540060	279764	276598	SPAC8E11.07c	SPBC106.01	alp31	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.327660265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779713	2543341	2540913	279764	277429	SPAC8E11.07c	SPBC56F2.08c	alp31	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.758187094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779714	2543341	2542358	279764	278823	SPAC8E11.07c	SPAC1782.09c	alp31	clp1	-	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506825664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779715	2543341	2542378	279764	278842	SPAC8E11.07c	SPAC1805.04	alp31	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443526418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779716	2543341	2538993	279764	275567	SPAC8E11.07c	SPCC162.12	alp31	tco89	-	SPCC1753.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.808311921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779717	2543341	2541856	279764	278347	SPAC8E11.07c	SPAC23H3.08c	alp31	bub3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.139738893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779718	2543341	2541633	279764	278129	SPAC8E11.07c	SPAC664.01c	alp31	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197907181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779719	2543341	2540664	279764	277189	SPAC8E11.07c	SPBC215.02	alp31	bob1	-	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.012276931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779720	2543341	2539226	279764	275796	SPAC8E11.07c	SPCC16C4.20c	alp31	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.504666203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779721	2543341	2542816	279764	279263	SPAC8E11.07c	SPAC4G8.11c	alp31	atp10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865071335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779722	2543341	2541498	279764	278000	SPAC8E11.07c	SPAC227.10	alp31	SPAC227.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.317884151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779723	2543341	2540425	279764	276953	SPAC8E11.07c	SPBC27.06c	alp31	mgr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.260484529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779724	2543341	2542318	279764	278784	SPAC8E11.07c	SPAC16C9.05	alp31	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.121046589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779725	2543341	2540663	279764	277188	SPAC8E11.07c	SPBC56F2.06	alp31	mug147	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640730617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779726	2543341	2543563	279764	279979	SPAC8E11.07c	SPAC664.02c	alp31	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.427848277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779727	2543341	2542177	279764	278652	SPAC8E11.07c	SPAC17H9.08	alp31	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.824197395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779728	2543341	2541545	279764	278045	SPAC8E11.07c	SPAC22F8.07c	alp31	rtf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195657878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779729	2543341	2540150	279764	276687	SPAC8E11.07c	SPBC16E9.14c	alp31	zrg17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699006374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779730	2543341	2541889	279764	278379	SPAC8E11.07c	SPAC2F7.03c	alp31	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.140417271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779731	2543341	2539603	279764	276161	SPAC8E11.07c	SPBC1289.06c	alp31	ppr8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931390511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779732	2543341	2543378	279764	279800	SPAC8E11.07c	SPAC3H8.07c	alp31	pac10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.057041917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779733	2543341	2541009	279764	277524	SPAC8E11.07c	SPBC428.04	alp31	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.414785827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779734	2543341	2540342	279764	276871	SPAC8E11.07c	SPBC2G2.01c	alp31	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.135527188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779735	2543341	2541054	279764	277569	SPAC8E11.07c	SPBC3B8.08	alp31	SPBC3B8.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.666213682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779736	2543341	2538690	279764	275275	SPAC8E11.07c	SPCC1393.05	alp31	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331016254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779737	2543341	2540229	279764	276761	SPAC8E11.07c	SPBC31F10.15c	alp31	atp15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979366515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779738	2543341	2538884	279764	275462	SPAC8E11.07c	SPCC1393.08	alp31	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.409537149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779739	2543341	2538848	279764	275429	SPAC8E11.07c	SPCC613.12c	alp31	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.776793632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779740	2543341	2541628	279764	278124	SPAC8E11.07c	SPAC110.02	alp31	pds5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.374412303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779741	2543341	2539538	279764	276100	SPAC8E11.07c	SPCC364.06	alp31	nap1	-	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324606647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779742	2543341	2539908	279764	276454	SPAC8E11.07c	SPBC13E7.06	alp31	msd1	-	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.316572122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779743	2543341	2542198	279764	278673	SPAC8E11.07c	SPAC6F12.09	alp31	rdp1	-	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.644709239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779744	2543341	2540498	279764	277026	SPAC8E11.07c	SPBC27.02c	alp31	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.622658956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779745	2543341	2543602	279764	280017	SPAC8E11.07c	SPAPB1A11.04c	alp31	mca1	-	SPAPB1A11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.918647278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779746	2543341	2542628	279764	279082	SPAC8E11.07c	SPAC24H6.06	alp31	sld3	-	mug175	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.999992319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779747	2543341	2539205	279764	275775	SPAC8E11.07c	SPCC4B3.15	alp31	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.978727885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779748	2543341	2543220	279764	279648	SPAC8E11.07c	SPAPB21F2.02	alp31	SPAPB21F2.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877429837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779749	2543341	2542424	279764	278886	SPAC8E11.07c	SPAC1805.14	alp31	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450541271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779750	2543341	2541478	279764	277980	SPAC8E11.07c	SPAC2F7.17	alp31	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.403509581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779751	2543341	2543372	279764	279794	SPAC8E11.07c	SPAPB1A10.09	alp31	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.286672807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779752	2540437	2540528	276965	277056	SPBC25B2.07c	SPBC18H10.04c	mmb1	sce3	mug164	tif48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.32402614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779753	2540437	2541621	276965	278118	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC29A4.17c	mmb1	SPAC29A4.17c	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.449038586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779754	2540437	2538857	276965	275437	SPBC25B2.07c	SPCC1442.05c	mmb1	SPCC1442.05c	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.705281557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779755	2540437	2539939	276965	276483	SPBC25B2.07c	SPBC11G11.01	mmb1	fis1	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.367601464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779756	2540437	2541681	276965	278177	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC14C4.01c	mmb1	SPAC14C4.01c	mug164	SPAC19D5.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.90325255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779757	2540437	2540347	276965	276876	SPBC25B2.07c	SPBC30B4.08	mmb1	eri1	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.491940108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779758	2540437	2542701	276965	279154	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC26H5.05	mmb1	mga2	mug164	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.50015124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779759	2540437	2541286	276965	277799	SPBC25B2.07c	SPBC9B6.11c	mmb1	SPBC9B6.11c	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.839291081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779760	2540437	2539226	276965	275796	SPBC25B2.07c	SPCC16C4.20c	mmb1	SPCC16C4.20c	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568089985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779761	2540437	2541994	276965	278478	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC26A3.14c	mmb1	SPAC26A3.14c	mug164	SPAC23A6.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.074127547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779762	2540437	2543230	276965	279658	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC823.13c	mmb1	SPAC823.13c	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.074424495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779763	2540437	2542689	276965	279142	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC29B12.04	mmb1	snz1	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842514301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779764	2540437	2539331	276965	275897	SPBC25B2.07c	SPCC24B10.09	mmb1	rps1702	mug164	rps17|rps17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.347417507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779765	2540437	2542318	276965	278784	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC16C9.05	mmb1	cph1	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.778054607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779766	2540437	2539823	276965	276373	SPBC25B2.07c	SPBC16A3.18	mmb1	cip1	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781709952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779767	2540437	2543563	276965	279979	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC664.02c	mmb1	arp8	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.622070551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779768	2540437	2543584	276965	279999	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAPB1E7.11c	mmb1	SPAPB1E7.11c	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635327631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779769	2540437	2539352	276965	275918	SPBC25B2.07c	SPCC188.07	mmb1	ccq1	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441000502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779770	2540437	2539100	276965	275672	SPBC25B2.07c	SPCC330.12c	mmb1	sdh3	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.947186365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779771	2540437	2540319	276965	276849	SPBC25B2.07c	SPBC30D10.16	mmb1	pha2	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379402271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779772	2540437	2539032	276965	275605	SPBC25B2.07c	SPCC4B3.05c	mmb1	hem12	mug164	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931033115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779773	2540437	2542260	276965	278729	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC1F12.05	mmb1	SPAC1F12.05	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.71113453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779774	2540437	2543020	276965	279456	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC10F6.13c	mmb1	SPAC10F6.13c	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708927654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779775	2540437	2541649	276965	278145	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC1F3.06c	mmb1	spo15	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506363287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779776	2540437	2542544	276965	279001	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC18G6.10	mmb1	lem2	mug164	heh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632647264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779777	2540437	2540673	276965	277198	SPBC25B2.07c	SPBC1D7.03	mmb1	mug80	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328846479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779778	2540437	2542543	276965	279000	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC30D11.11	mmb1	SPAC30D11.11	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.71369841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779779	2540437	2539484	276965	276047	SPBC25B2.07c	SPCC594.04c	mmb1	SPCC594.04c	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636166555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779780	2540437	2543313	276965	279737	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAPJ691.03	mmb1	SPAPJ691.03	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.064391245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779781	2540437	2543406	276965	279828	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC9.12c	mmb1	atp12	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582773052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779782	2540437	2543631	276965	280045	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC458.02c	mmb1	SPAC458.02c	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.802254772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779783	2540437	2539958	276965	276502	SPBC25B2.07c	SPBC1718.07c	mmb1	zfs1	mug164	moc4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.438136236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779784	2540437	2542549	276965	279006	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC19A8.11c	mmb1	SPAC19A8.11c	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.945050707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779785	2540437	2541464	276965	277966	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC222.08c	mmb1	SPAC222.08c	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.627202471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779786	2540437	2541614	276965	278111	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC29A4.20	mmb1	elp3	mug164	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.564030643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779787	2540437	2540229	276965	276761	SPBC25B2.07c	SPBC31F10.15c	mmb1	atp15	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7504196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779788	2540437	2542829	276965	279276	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC13D6.02c	mmb1	byr3	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378149136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779789	2540437	2541488	276965	277990	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC227.17c	mmb1	SPAC227.17c	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569460404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779790	2540437	2541378	276965	277889	SPBC25B2.07c	SPBP8B7.21	mmb1	ubp3	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.908253635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779791	2540437	3361526	276965	280602	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC664.15	mmb1	caf4	mug164	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.384291044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779792	2540437	2541017	276965	277532	SPBC25B2.07c	SPBC36.07	mmb1	elp1	mug164	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.344574855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779793	2540437	2541713	276965	278208	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC3A12.12	mmb1	atp11	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.131630793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779794	2540437	2540226	276965	276758	SPBC25B2.07c	SPBC32H8.08c	mmb1	omh5	mug164	pi016|SPACTOKYO_453.20	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.559460105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779795	2540437	2542881	276965	279326	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC13F5.03c	mmb1	gld1	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.567485561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779796	2540437	2543304	276965	279728	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC6B12.12	mmb1	tom70	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.123483803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779797	2540437	2540935	276965	277451	SPBC25B2.07c	SPBC359.04c	mmb1	pfl7	mug164	SPBC359.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820502399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779798	2540437	2538756	276965	275339	SPBC25B2.07c	SPCC1795.10c	mmb1	SPCC1795.10c	mug164	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929723987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779799	2540437	2539136	276965	275708	SPBC25B2.07c	SPCC1919.05	mmb1	SPCC1919.05	mug164	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933463365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779800	2540437	2543420	276965	279842	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC3H1.04c	mmb1	mdm31	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.323792745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779801	2540437	2539488	276965	276051	SPBC25B2.07c	SPCC645.08c	mmb1	snd1	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.936156282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779802	2540437	2543633	276965	280047	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC3H8.05c	mmb1	mms1	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513547051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779803	2540437	2539205	276965	275775	SPBC25B2.07c	SPCC4B3.15	mmb1	mid1	mug164	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.071997231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779804	2540437	2540563	276965	277090	SPBC25B2.07c	SPBC25H2.09	mmb1	SPBC25H2.09	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.072208153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779805	2540437	2543337	276965	279760	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC959.08	mmb1	rpl2102	mug164	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.054889131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779806	2540437	2542716	276965	279169	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC25H1.07	mmb1	emc1	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.118712866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779807	2540437	2541675	276965	278171	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC22F8.12c	mmb1	shf1	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.068532618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779808	2540437	2538854	276965	275435	SPBC25B2.07c	SPCP1E11.05c	mmb1	are2	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.072527905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779809	2540437	2541478	276965	277980	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC2F7.17	mmb1	mrf1	mug164	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.121053163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779810	2540437	2543333	276965	279756	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC694.02	mmb1	SPAC694.02	mug164	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.064516689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779811	2540907	2540068	277423	276606	SPBC582.10c	SPBC1734.12c	SPBC582.10c	alg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44349852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779812	2540907	2540595	277423	277121	SPBC582.10c	SPBC21C3.02c	SPBC582.10c	dep1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200920276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779813	2540907	2539310	277423	275877	SPBC582.10c	SPCC285.17	SPBC582.10c	spp27	-	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391457821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779814	2540907	2539845	277423	276393	SPBC582.10c	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC582.10c	ste20	-	ste16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.566463691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779815	2540907	2542123	277423	278599	SPBC582.10c	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC582.10c	mal3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874904582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779816	2540907	2539046	277423	275619	SPBC582.10c	SPCC1223.12c	SPBC582.10c	meu10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.203266761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779817	2540907	2541096	277423	277611	SPBC582.10c	SPBC725.10	SPBC582.10c	SPBC725.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.97110001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779818	2540907	2540326	277423	276856	SPBC582.10c	SPBC2G5.06c	SPBC582.10c	hmt2	-	cad1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194012149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779819	2540907	2540374	277423	276903	SPBC582.10c	SPBC31F10.02	SPBC582.10c	SPBC31F10.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876807044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779820	2540907	2542597	277423	279051	SPBC582.10c	SPAP8A3.07c	SPBC582.10c	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.53679687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779821	2540907	2542869	277423	279314	SPBC582.10c	SPAC140.02	SPBC582.10c	gar2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199640437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779822	2540907	2542883	277423	279328	SPBC582.10c	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC582.10c	alm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634230826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779823	2540907	2539207	277423	275777	SPBC582.10c	SPCC285.09c	SPBC582.10c	cgs2	-	pde1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924971892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779824	2542127	2542598	278603	279052	SPAC1952.12c	SPAC6G10.08	csn71	idp1	csn7|csn7a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.316840619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779825	2542127	2540425	278603	276953	SPAC1952.12c	SPBC27.06c	csn71	mgr2	csn7|csn7a	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931426363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779826	2542127	2543685	278603	280099	SPAC1952.12c	SPAC3C7.03c	csn71	rad55	csn7|csn7a	rhp55	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922674702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779827	2542127	2542036	278603	278518	SPAC1952.12c	SPAC23A1.19c	csn71	hrq1	csn7|csn7a	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.253198289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779828	2542127	2542177	278603	278652	SPAC1952.12c	SPAC17H9.08	csn71	SPAC17H9.08	csn7|csn7a	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807907923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779829	2542127	2539603	278603	276161	SPAC1952.12c	SPBC1289.06c	csn71	ppr8	csn7|csn7a	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262365556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779830	2542127	2538994	278603	275568	SPAC1952.12c	SPCC553.01c	csn71	dbl2	csn7|csn7a	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.630072089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779831	2542127	2542007	278603	278490	SPAC1952.12c	SPAC20H4.07	csn71	rad57	csn7|csn7a	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.075428756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779832	2542127	2540342	278603	276871	SPAC1952.12c	SPBC2G2.01c	csn71	liz1	csn7|csn7a	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579058992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779833	2542127	2539527	278603	276089	SPAC1952.12c	SPCC338.16	csn71	pof3	csn7|csn7a	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.986255666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779834	2542127	2541713	278603	278208	SPAC1952.12c	SPAC3A12.12	csn71	atp11	csn7|csn7a	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.162284364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779835	2542127	2540498	278603	277026	SPAC1952.12c	SPBC27.02c	csn71	ask1	csn7|csn7a	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.74818747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779836	2542127	2541115	278603	277630	SPAC1952.12c	SPBC660.07	csn71	ntp1	csn7|csn7a	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.937482631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779837	2542127	2543387	278603	279809	SPAC1952.12c	SPAPB1E7.02c	csn71	mcl1	csn7|csn7a	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.225961219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779838	2543078	2539050	279511	275623	SPAC31A2.15c	SPCC11E10.08	dcc1	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.982314912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779839	2543078	2540060	279511	276598	SPAC31A2.15c	SPBC106.01	dcc1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.76451098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779840	2543078	2542577	279511	279033	SPAC31A2.15c	SPAC19G12.15c	dcc1	tpp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869289134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779841	2543078	2541512	279511	278013	SPAC31A2.15c	SPAC11E3.08c	dcc1	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.631031021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779842	2543078	2541117	279511	277632	SPAC31A2.15c	SPBC646.13	dcc1	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.509415843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779843	2543078	2542502	279511	278960	SPAC31A2.15c	SPAC139.06	dcc1	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448556973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779844	2543078	2539420	279511	275985	SPAC31A2.15c	SPCC970.07c	dcc1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.215457925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779845	2543078	2539064	279511	275636	SPAC31A2.15c	SPCC126.06	dcc1	twf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818679158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779846	2543078	2540425	279511	276953	SPAC31A2.15c	SPBC27.06c	dcc1	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389694118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779847	2543078	2539441	279511	276004	SPAC31A2.15c	SPCPJ732.02c	dcc1	xks1	-	SPCPJ732.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.082567028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779848	2543078	2540127	279511	276664	SPAC31A2.15c	SPBC106.20	dcc1	exo70	-	SPBC582.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984183004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779849	2543078	2540825	279511	277343	SPAC31A2.15c	SPBC428.08c	dcc1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.938611028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779850	2543078	2541800	279511	278291	SPAC31A2.15c	SPAC732.02c	dcc1	SPAC732.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.521296729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779851	2543078	2540352	279511	276881	SPAC31A2.15c	SPBC215.03c	dcc1	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634652058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779852	2543078	2543412	279511	279834	SPAC31A2.15c	SPAC637.07	dcc1	moe1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875791998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779853	2543078	2541496	279511	277998	SPAC31A2.15c	SPAC23D3.09	dcc1	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.69866039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779854	2543078	2543118	279511	279550	SPAC31A2.15c	SPAC3G6.11	dcc1	chl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.593326126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779855	2543078	2540751	279511	277273	SPAC31A2.15c	SPBC20F10.10	dcc1	psl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.084112149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779856	2543078	2541694	279511	278190	SPAC31A2.15c	SPAC1071.04c	dcc1	spc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506472679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779857	2543078	2539519	279511	276081	SPAC31A2.15c	SPCC364.05	dcc1	vps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454196339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779858	2543078	2541628	279511	278124	SPAC31A2.15c	SPAC110.02	dcc1	pds5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388172403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779859	2543078	2539763	279511	276314	SPAC31A2.15c	SPBC1861.05	dcc1	SPBC1861.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44264676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779860	2543078	2542769	279511	279219	SPAC31A2.15c	SPAC15A10.10	dcc1	mde6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926003782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779861	2543078	2540498	279511	277026	SPAC31A2.15c	SPBC27.02c	dcc1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.81675429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779862	2543078	2541531	279511	278031	SPAC31A2.15c	SPAC25A8.01c	dcc1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.459566368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779863	2543078	2542418	279511	278881	SPAC31A2.15c	SPAC1805.07c	dcc1	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.329920753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779864	2543078	2540936	279511	277452	SPAC31A2.15c	SPBC800.05c	dcc1	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.512321415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779865	2543078	2543380	279511	279802	SPAC31A2.15c	SPAC4G9.16c	dcc1	rpl901	-	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712737865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779866	2543078	2539700	279511	276253	SPAC31A2.15c	SPBC1685.15c	dcc1	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.602672287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779867	2543078	2543387	279511	279809	SPAC31A2.15c	SPAPB1E7.02c	dcc1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.286701593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779868	2539098	2540913	275670	277429	SPCC24B10.18	SPBC56F2.08c	SPCC24B10.18	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.252253174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779869	2539098	2543434	275670	279854	SPCC24B10.18	SPAC8F11.02c	SPCC24B10.18	dph3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636820234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779870	2539098	2540727	275670	277250	SPCC24B10.18	SPBC1921.03c	SPCC24B10.18	mex67	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.342038035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779871	2539098	2540295	275670	276826	SPCC24B10.18	SPBC3B8.05	SPCC24B10.18	SPBC3B8.05	-	dph1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509128578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779872	2539098	2543685	275670	280099	SPCC24B10.18	SPAC3C7.03c	SPCC24B10.18	rad55	-	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383079598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779873	2539098	2542239	275670	278711	SPCC24B10.18	SPAC18G6.02c	SPCC24B10.18	chp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.180658591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779874	2539098	2541900	275670	278390	SPCC24B10.18	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC24B10.18	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.598852474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779875	2539098	2538848	275670	275429	SPCC24B10.18	SPCC613.12c	SPCC24B10.18	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.670161547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779876	2539098	2543619	275670	280033	SPCC24B10.18	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC24B10.18	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713000809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779877	2539098	2540146	275670	276683	SPCC24B10.18	SPBC17A3.06	SPCC24B10.18	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.598055216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779878	2539098	2541806	275670	278297	SPCC24B10.18	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC24B10.18	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.551298319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779879	2539098	2542886	275670	279331	SPCC24B10.18	SPAC1486.01	SPCC24B10.18	SPAC1486.01	-	sod2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256392383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779880	2543513	2541208	279931	277722	SPAC821.06	SPBC887.04c	spn2	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.584783527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779881	2543513	2542299	279931	278766	SPAC821.06	SPAC18B11.10	spn2	tup11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329256715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779882	2543513	2542555	279931	279012	SPAC821.06	SPAC1952.06c	spn2	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.56091047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779883	2543513	2540825	279931	277343	SPAC821.06	SPBC428.08c	spn2	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.416521125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779884	2543513	2538848	279931	275429	SPAC821.06	SPCC613.12c	spn2	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.34672257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779885	2543513	2543304	279931	279728	SPAC821.06	SPAC6B12.12	spn2	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.497793152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779886	2543513	2541432	279931	277937	SPAC821.06	SPAC1F5.05c	spn2	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.070446475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779887	2543513	2541531	279931	278031	SPAC821.06	SPAC25A8.01c	spn2	fft3	-	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.088426279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779888	2543513	2542826	279931	279273	SPAC821.06	SPAC13G6.09	spn2	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.056780411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779889	2543513	2540936	279931	277452	SPAC821.06	SPBC800.05c	spn2	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.848535892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779890	2543638	2541013	280052	277528	SPAC3H8.09c	SPBC3H7.13	nab3	far10	-	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.051959727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779891	2543638	2542568	280052	279024	SPAC3H8.09c	SPAC1952.02	nab3	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.271897817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779892	2543638	2539733	280052	276285	SPAC3H8.09c	SPBC16E9.12c	nab3	pab2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.052929388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779893	2543638	2540673	280052	277198	SPAC3H8.09c	SPBC1D7.03	nab3	mug80	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.018591524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779894	2543638	2540801	280052	277320	SPAC3H8.09c	SPBC18H10.10c	nab3	saf4	-	cwc16|cwf16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.66171698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779895	2543638	2540997	280052	277513	SPAC3H8.09c	SPBC3H7.06c	nab3	pof9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.271915291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779896	2543638	2543517	280052	279935	SPAC3H8.09c	SPAC3G9.05	nab3	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.547356215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779897	2543638	2541614	280052	278111	SPAC3H8.09c	SPAC29A4.20	nab3	elp3	-	kat9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.340359169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779898	2543638	2539101	280052	275673	SPAC3H8.09c	SPCC736.04c	nab3	gma12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.37739695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779899	2543638	2540346	280052	276875	SPAC3H8.09c	SPBC2F12.03c	nab3	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.293623992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779900	2543638	2542059	280052	278537	SPAC3H8.09c	SPAC328.06	nab3	ubp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.108300243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779901	2538832	2539008	275413	275581	SPCC962.06c	SPCC584.03c	bpb1	SPCC584.03c	sf1|ods3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.539192294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779902	2538832	2540893	275413	277409	SPCC962.06c	SPBC543.10	bpb1	get1	sf1|ods3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.561239573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779903	2541211	2541801	277725	278292	SPBC839.10	SPAC2F7.08c	usp107	snf5	snu71	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.908845848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779904	2541211	2541496	277725	277998	SPBC839.10	SPAC23D3.09	usp107	arp42	snu71	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.33349022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779905	2541211	2540318	277725	276848	SPBC839.10	SPBC30B4.04c	usp107	sol1	snu71	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.84560634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779906	2540732	2539949	277255	276493	SPBC19G7.13	SPBC1703.04	tbf1	mlh1	trf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.060884523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779907	2540732	2541130	277255	277645	SPBC19G7.13	SPBC776.11	tbf1	rpl2801	trf1	rpl28-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.616905749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779908	2540732	2542502	277255	278960	SPBC19G7.13	SPAC139.06	tbf1	hat1	trf1	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03797349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779909	2540732	2541964	277255	278450	SPBC19G7.13	SPAC2F3.08	tbf1	sut1	trf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.204541115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779910	2540732	2540160	277255	276695	SPBC19G7.13	SPBC1773.17c	tbf1	SPBC1773.17c	trf1	SPBP26C9.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579062294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779911	2540732	2541664	277255	278160	SPBC19G7.13	SPAC2H10.01	tbf1	SPAC2H10.01	trf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044431639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779912	2540732	2541800	277255	278291	SPBC19G7.13	SPAC732.02c	tbf1	SPAC732.02c	trf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.404137235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779913	2540732	2543511	277255	279929	SPBC19G7.13	SPAC4G9.19	tbf1	SPAC4G9.19	trf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865251813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779914	2540732	2543389	277255	279811	SPBC19G7.13	SPAPB1A11.02	tbf1	SPAPB1A11.02	trf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148159425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779915	2540732	2543080	277255	279513	SPBC19G7.13	SPAC3A11.10c	tbf1	SPAC3A11.10c	trf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.507650942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779916	2540732	2539066	277255	275638	SPBC19G7.13	SPCC126.13c	tbf1	SPCC126.13c	trf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985290527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779917	2540732	2540821	277255	277339	SPBC19G7.13	SPBC800.03	tbf1	clr3	trf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.011015451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779918	2540732	2542883	277255	279328	SPBC19G7.13	SPAC1486.04c	tbf1	alm1	trf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318341577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779919	2540732	2539251	277255	275821	SPBC19G7.13	SPCC24B10.02c	tbf1	SPCC24B10.02c	trf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819460011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779920	2540732	2539767	277255	276318	SPBC19G7.13	SPBC1703.06	tbf1	pof10	trf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.921721633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779921	2540732	2543387	277255	279809	SPBC19G7.13	SPAPB1E7.02c	tbf1	mcl1	trf1	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77166062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779922	2540732	2540649	277255	277174	SPBC19G7.13	SPBC19F8.08	tbf1	rps401	trf1	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570810851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779923	2539327	2538796	275893	275377	SPCC1442.13c	SPCC63.06	SPCC1442.13c	SPCC63.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389676398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779924	2539327	2541545	275893	278045	SPCC1442.13c	SPAC22F8.07c	SPCC1442.13c	rtf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990957805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779925	2539327	2541156	275893	277671	SPCC1442.13c	SPBC685.07c	SPCC1442.13c	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.444916179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779926	2539327	2540464	275893	276992	SPCC1442.13c	SPBC23E6.02	SPCC1442.13c	rrp2	-	SPBC23E6.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.97941855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779927	2541168	2538710	277683	275294	SPBC6B1.10	SPCC1020.12c	prp17	xap5	-	SPCC14G10.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.341099709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779928	2541168	2542468	277683	278929	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC1D4.09c	prp17	rtf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.413048001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779929	2541168	2543102	277683	279534	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC31G5.21	prp17	SPAC31G5.21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.54021705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779930	2541168	2542857	277683	279303	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC144.06	prp17	apl5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574746196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779931	2541168	5802861	277683	857999	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC1D4.01	prp17	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.970620646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779932	2541168	2542222	277683	278695	SPBC6B1.10	SPAC31G5.18c	prp17	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.897489557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779933	2541168	2541124	277683	277639	SPBC6B1.10	SPBC646.02	prp17	cwf11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.463534302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779934	2540983	2538961	277499	275535	SPBC337.06c	SPCC285.14	cwf15	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.738115387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779935	2540983	2540105	277499	276642	SPBC337.06c	SPBC106.04	cwf15	ada1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.054141482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779936	2540983	2540131	277499	276668	SPBC337.06c	SPBC1778.05c	cwf15	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.375436662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779937	2540983	2541130	277499	277645	SPBC337.06c	SPBC776.11	cwf15	rpl2801	-	rpl28-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.351250249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779938	2540983	5802945	277499	858083	SPBC337.06c	SPAC19G12.16c	cwf15	adg2	-	SPAC23A1.01c|mug46	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510031019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779939	2540983	2539226	277499	275796	SPBC337.06c	SPCC16C4.20c	cwf15	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.698443814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779940	2540983	2542468	277499	278929	SPBC337.06c	SPAC1D4.09c	cwf15	rtf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.817000101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779941	2540983	2539510	277499	276072	SPBC337.06c	SPCC4G3.04c	cwf15	coq5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509294221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779942	2540983	2542555	277499	279012	SPBC337.06c	SPAC1952.06c	cwf15	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.695925811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779943	2540983	2542318	277499	278784	SPBC337.06c	SPAC16C9.05	cwf15	cph1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.339013169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779944	2540983	2540595	277499	277121	SPBC337.06c	SPBC21C3.02c	cwf15	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509923127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779945	2540983	2542220	277499	278694	SPBC337.06c	SPAC1A6.03c	cwf15	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.183558586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779946	2540983	2541522	277499	278023	SPBC337.06c	SPAC23E2.01	cwf15	fep1	-	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.06562522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779947	2540983	2543584	277499	279999	SPBC337.06c	SPAPB1E7.11c	cwf15	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.804678481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779948	2540983	2543426	277499	279846	SPBC337.06c	SPAC631.02	cwf15	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.19301152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779949	2540983	2542981	277499	279419	SPBC337.06c	SPAC824.02	cwf15	bst1	-	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.63683722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779950	2540983	2542568	277499	279024	SPBC337.06c	SPAC1952.02	cwf15	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.327699044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779951	2540983	2539023	277499	275596	SPBC337.06c	SPCC594.05c	cwf15	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634836241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779952	2540983	2538821	277499	275402	SPBC337.06c	SPCC584.01c	cwf15	SPCC584.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.115387062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779953	2540983	2539845	277499	276393	SPBC337.06c	SPBC12C2.02c	cwf15	ste20	-	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.257344774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779954	2540983	2543412	277499	279834	SPBC337.06c	SPAC637.07	cwf15	moe1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.918944005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779955	2540983	2540673	277499	277198	SPBC337.06c	SPBC1D7.03	cwf15	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.626858737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779956	2540983	2543667	277499	280081	SPBC337.06c	SPAC4H3.02c	cwf15	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.399277944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779957	2540983	2540452	277499	276980	SPBC337.06c	SPBC2A9.11c	cwf15	iss9	-	SPBC2A9.11c|SPBC2D10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.176558693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779958	2540983	2543643	277499	280057	SPBC337.06c	SPAC3G9.07c	cwf15	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.310107648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779959	2540983	2541899	277499	278389	SPBC337.06c	SPAC22E12.11c	cwf15	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.626030201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779960	2540983	2539667	277499	276222	SPBC337.06c	SPBC13G1.08c	cwf15	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.617786365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779961	2540983	2542528	277499	278986	SPBC337.06c	SPAC1B3.08	cwf15	SPAC1B3.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.809896544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779962	2540983	2542874	277499	279319	SPBC337.06c	SPAC20H4.09	cwf15	SPAC20H4.09	-	SPAC145.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.109313479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779963	2540983	2542254	277499	278724	SPBC337.06c	SPAC30D11.04c	cwf15	nup124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328606749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779964	2540983	5802861	277499	857999	SPBC337.06c	SPAC1D4.01	cwf15	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641742274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779965	2540983	2541536	277499	278036	SPBC337.06c	SPAC1071.02	cwf15	mms19	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81673655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779966	2540983	2539213	277499	275783	SPBC337.06c	SPCC285.10c	cwf15	SPCC285.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639599563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779967	2540983	2541896	277499	278386	SPBC337.06c	SPAC23H4.16c	cwf15	SPAC23H4.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.142594607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779968	2540983	3361520	277499	280596	SPBC337.06c	SPAC1610.02c	cwf15	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928605722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779969	2540983	2540643	277499	277168	SPBC337.06c	SPBC19G7.06	cwf15	mbx1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513315494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779970	2540983	2540001	277499	276545	SPBC337.06c	SPBC1289.13c	cwf15	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.901075198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779971	2540983	2541156	277499	277671	SPBC337.06c	SPBC685.07c	cwf15	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86419227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779972	2540983	2538762	277499	275345	SPBC337.06c	SPCC306.04c	cwf15	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.561927729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779973	2540983	2539137	277499	275709	SPBC337.06c	SPCC1682.08c	cwf15	mcp2	-	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379126762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779974	2540983	2542881	277499	279326	SPBC337.06c	SPAC13F5.03c	cwf15	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388834439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779975	2540983	2540164	277499	276699	SPBC337.06c	SPBC1683.03c	cwf15	SPBC1683.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.921299027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779976	2540983	2542222	277499	278695	SPBC337.06c	SPAC31G5.18c	cwf15	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.491517551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779977	2540983	2543437	277499	279857	SPBC337.06c	SPAPB1A10.14	cwf15	pof15	-	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447678492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779978	2540983	2538787	277499	275368	SPBC337.06c	SPCC364.02c	cwf15	bis1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.131416039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779979	2540983	2538840	277499	275421	SPBC337.06c	SPCC736.07c	cwf15	SPCC736.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.801381303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779980	2540983	2542716	277499	279169	SPBC337.06c	SPAC25H1.07	cwf15	emc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.999242059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779981	2540983	2541297	277499	277809	SPBC337.06c	SPBC9B6.07	cwf15	nop52	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098904835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779982	2540983	2540734	277499	277257	SPBC337.06c	SPBC19G7.09	cwf15	ulp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.043997723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779983	2542840	2541343	279286	277854	SPAC13G6.08	SPBPB2B2.19c	SPAC13G6.08	SPBPB2B2.19c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.650612939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779984	2542840	2541408	279286	277916	SPAC13G6.08	SPBPB2B2.14c	SPAC13G6.08	SPBPB2B2.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.150095735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779985	2542840	2538847	279286	275428	SPAC13G6.08	SPCC594.06c	SPAC13G6.08	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.50143784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779986	2542840	2540533	279286	277061	SPAC13G6.08	SPBC29A10.16c	SPAC13G6.08	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.542448416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779987	2542840	2542303	279286	278770	SPAC13G6.08	SPAC1687.21	SPAC13G6.08	SPAC1687.21	-	SPAC222.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.300133945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779988	2542840	2543090	279286	279523	SPAC13G6.08	SPBC1348.01	SPAC13G6.08	SPBC1348.01	-	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.983331234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779989	2539956	2542895	276500	279339	SPBC16E9.11c	SPAC13G6.10c	pub3	asl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819988405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779990	2539956	2540131	276500	276668	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBC1778.05c	pub3	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813541958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779991	2539956	2541167	276500	277682	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBC691.05c	pub3	SPBC691.05c	-	pi030|SPACTOKYO_453.04|SPBP22H7.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770000579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779992	2539956	2541098	276500	277613	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBC577.13	pub3	syj2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574373025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779993	2539956	2542613	276500	279067	SPBC16E9.11c	SPAC18B11.03c	pub3	SPAC18B11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44615638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779994	2539956	2542273	276500	278742	SPBC16E9.11c	SPAC17H9.13c	pub3	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.278594799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779995	2539956	2541500	276500	278002	SPBC16E9.11c	SPAC227.18	pub3	lys3	-	SPAC2F7.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.682401463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779996	2539956	2540692	276500	277217	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBC800.07c	pub3	tsf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.226747391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779997	2539956	2539895	276500	276441	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBC1683.10c	pub3	pcl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87187367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779998	2539956	2540425	276500	276953	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBC27.06c	pub3	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.182995464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
779999	2539956	2542277	276500	278746	SPBC16E9.11c	SPAC17A5.02c	pub3	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.686042435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780000	2539956	2539792	276500	276342	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBC1271.14	pub3	SPBC1271.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324755956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780001	2539956	2539822	276500	276372	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBC16G5.02c	pub3	SPBC16G5.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096193468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780002	2539956	2543584	276500	279999	SPBC16E9.11c	SPAPB1E7.11c	pub3	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.777533815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780003	2539956	2540964	276500	277480	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBC365.16	pub3	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318074001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780004	2539956	2541093	276500	277608	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBC646.08c	pub3	SPBC646.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378610242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780005	2539956	2543593	276500	280008	SPBC16E9.11c	SPAC4G9.10	pub3	arg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.059236969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780006	2539956	2540831	276500	277349	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBC428.02c	pub3	eca39	-	SPBC582.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.400249671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780007	2539956	2542946	276500	279386	SPBC16E9.11c	SPAC6F12.03c	pub3	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.805486833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780008	2539956	2539815	276500	276365	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBC1105.02c	pub3	lys4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.830408831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780009	2539956	2542867	276500	279312	SPBC16E9.11c	SPAC343.16	pub3	lys2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.496844369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780010	2539956	2542549	276500	279006	SPBC16E9.11c	SPAC19A8.11c	pub3	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.319978602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780011	2539956	2541395	276500	277904	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBP8B7.25	pub3	cyp4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.260290531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780012	2539956	2543315	276500	279739	SPBC16E9.11c	SPAC6B12.07c	pub3	SPAC6B12.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932374542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780013	2539956	2541296	276500	277808	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBP8B7.06	pub3	rpp201	-	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378304652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780014	2539956	2540229	276500	276761	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBC31F10.15c	pub3	atp15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.566888213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780015	2539956	2539812	276500	276362	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBC1347.02	pub3	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.507409601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780016	2539956	2541337	276500	277848	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBP35G2.13c	pub3	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.190287147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780017	2539956	2540589	276500	277115	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBC20F10.06	pub3	mad2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578930191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780018	2539956	2543391	276500	279813	SPBC16E9.11c	SPAC4G9.09c	pub3	arg11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.686613236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780019	2539956	2542516	276500	278974	SPBC16E9.11c	SPAC2F7.04	pub3	pmc2	-	med1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.434744893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780020	2539956	2541175	276500	277689	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBC839.13c	pub3	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639283933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780021	2539956	2540800	276500	277319	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBC409.20c	pub3	psh3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.518022951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780022	2539956	2543192	276500	279621	SPBC16E9.11c	SPAC343.18	pub3	rfp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81399573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780023	2539956	2540089	276500	276627	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBC32H8.01c	pub3	SPBC32H8.01c	-	SPBP22H7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769358938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780024	2539956	2543329	276500	279752	SPBC16E9.11c	SPAC56F8.02	pub3	SPAC56F8.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510405879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780025	2539956	2540164	276500	276699	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBC1683.03c	pub3	SPBC1683.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.640101741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780026	2539956	2539136	276500	275708	SPBC16E9.11c	SPCC1919.05	pub3	SPCC1919.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.100509184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780027	2539956	2541860	276500	278350	SPBC16E9.11c	SPAC22F3.02	pub3	atf31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.254796424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780028	2539956	2539178	276500	275749	SPBC16E9.11c	SPCC1682.14	pub3	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567894315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780029	2539956	2539253	276500	275823	SPBC16E9.11c	SPCC1827.03c	pub3	SPCC1827.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877976225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780030	2539956	2540122	276500	276659	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBC1778.03c	pub3	SPBC1778.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.260162342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780031	2539956	2543076	276500	279509	SPBC16E9.11c	SPAC30C2.07	pub3	SPAC30C2.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931994734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780032	2539956	2539768	276500	276319	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBC1703.09	pub3	SPBC1703.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816998231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780033	2539956	2541050	276500	277565	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBC428.05c	pub3	arg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703332791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780034	2539956	2543448	276500	279868	SPBC16E9.11c	SPAC3H5.07	pub3	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391336485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780035	2539956	2542890	276500	279334	SPBC16E9.11c	SPAC13G6.14	pub3	aps1	-	SPAC24B11.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.62343179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780036	2539956	2540649	276500	277174	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBC19F8.08	pub3	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439885009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780037	2539956	2538730	276500	275314	SPBC16E9.11c	SPCC31H12.02c	pub3	mug73	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.181275425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780038	2539668	2542207	276223	278682	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC17H9.10c	pht1	ddb1	pi001	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.294247412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780039	2539668	2540060	276223	276598	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC106.01	pht1	mph1	pi001	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.002025407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780040	2539668	2540105	276223	276642	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC106.04	pht1	ada1	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.913305299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780041	2539668	2543529	276223	279947	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC4C5.02c	pht1	ryh1	pi001	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.46530954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780042	2539668	2543634	276223	280048	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC3H8.04	pht1	SPAC3H8.04	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511701484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780043	2539668	2541512	276223	278013	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC11E3.08c	pht1	nse6	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.39395837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780044	2539668	2542197	276223	278672	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC1142.01	pht1	rqc1	pi001	SPAC1142.01|SPAC17G6.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573918908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780045	2539668	2539582	276223	276141	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC594.07c	pht1	bqt3	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.474968869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780046	2539668	2542358	276223	278823	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC1782.09c	pht1	clp1	pi001	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.460248659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780047	2539668	2543524	276223	279942	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC4D7.07c	pht1	csi2	pi001	SPAC4D7.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633148629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780048	2539668	2539035	276223	275608	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC794.09c	pht1	tef101	pi001	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.186771583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780049	2539668	2543339	276223	279762	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC630.13c	pht1	tsc2	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.422416924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780050	2539668	3361561	276223	280637	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC11E3.01c	pht1	swr1	pi001	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.288417304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780051	2539668	2540296	276223	276827	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC2D10.05	pht1	exg3	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.40875211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780052	2539668	2541771	276223	278265	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC23H3.06	pht1	apl6	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.724815089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780053	2539668	2539309	276223	275876	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC4G3.19	pht1	alp16	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445999615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780054	2539668	2539420	276223	275985	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC970.07c	pht1	raf2	pi001	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.896066519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780055	2539668	2538775	276223	275357	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC23B6.05c	pht1	ssb3	pi001	rpa3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.080202533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780056	2539668	2543156	276223	279587	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAP8A3.13c	pht1	SPAP8A3.13c	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453663186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780057	2539668	2539564	276223	276125	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC550.12	pht1	arp6	pi001	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.413174744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780058	2539668	2539463	276223	276026	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC550.11	pht1	SPCC550.11	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707172071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780059	2539668	2542724	276223	279175	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC767.01c	pht1	vps1	pi001	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.9880399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780060	2539668	2539434	276223	275997	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC757.09c	pht1	rnc1	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.538406579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780061	2539668	2543453	276223	279873	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC3G9.03	pht1	rpl2301	pi001	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.220592393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780062	2539668	2540929	276223	277445	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC354.03	pht1	swd3	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.979545932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780063	2539668	2542135	276223	278611	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC13A11.04c	pht1	ubp8	pi001	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.405050748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780064	2539668	2542318	276223	278784	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC16C9.05	pht1	cph1	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.543226519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780065	2539668	2542277	276223	278746	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC17A5.02c	pht1	dbr1	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.283029792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780066	2539668	2540467	276223	276995	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC2G2.07c	pht1	mug178	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.250426458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780067	2539668	2540595	276223	277121	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC21C3.02c	pht1	dep1	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.043174267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780068	2539668	2539244	276223	275814	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC1672.06c	pht1	asp1	pi001	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.977444289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780069	2539668	2543563	276223	279979	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC664.02c	pht1	arp8	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.753536775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780070	2539668	2538698	276223	275283	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC1442.02	pht1	SPCC1442.02	pi001	SPCC1450.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445687241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780071	2539668	2541522	276223	278023	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC23E2.01	pht1	fep1	pi001	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.842262561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780072	2539668	2543426	276223	279846	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC631.02	pht1	bdf2	pi001	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.331745355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780073	2539668	2538906	276223	275483	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC1259.03	pht1	rpa12	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.211318616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780074	2539668	2540825	276223	277343	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC428.08c	pht1	clr4	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.664685429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780075	2539668	2541021	276223	277536	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC3B8.10c	pht1	nem1	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.137107853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780076	2539668	2542665	276223	279118	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC10F6.08c	pht1	nht10	pi001	nht1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.383844628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780077	2539668	2539023	276223	275596	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC594.05c	pht1	spf1	pi001	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575229951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780078	2539668	2542036	276223	278518	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC23A1.19c	pht1	hrq1	pi001	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.047151066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780079	2539668	2542311	276223	278777	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC16A10.05c	pht1	dad1	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.140263968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780080	2539668	2539051	276223	275624	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC1183.11	pht1	msy1	pi001	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5074289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780081	2539668	2542513	276223	278971	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC1952.05	pht1	gcn5	pi001	kat2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.917622054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780082	2539668	2541776	276223	278270	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC23H3.05c	pht1	swd1	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.925345199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780083	2539668	2543144	276223	279576	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC3F10.05c	pht1	mug113	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702352247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780084	2539668	2540352	276223	276881	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC215.03c	pht1	csn1	pi001	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.404551704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780085	2539668	2539733	276223	276285	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC16E9.12c	pht1	pab2	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1849286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780086	2539668	2541889	276223	278379	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC2F7.03c	pht1	pom1	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.906617229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780087	2539668	2540886	276223	277403	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC4F6.10	pht1	vps901	pi001	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.260193449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780088	2539668	2541496	276223	277998	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC23D3.09	pht1	arp42	pi001	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.947965359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780089	2539668	2543667	276223	280081	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC4H3.02c	pht1	swc3	pi001	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.868968969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780090	2539668	2542357	276223	278822	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC1782.07	pht1	qcr8	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.991790072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780091	2539668	2543643	276223	280057	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC3G9.07c	pht1	hos2	pi001	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.471037054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780092	2539668	2541899	276223	278389	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC22E12.11c	pht1	set3	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.916484204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780093	2539668	2540086	276223	276624	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC16H5.12c	pht1	SPBC16H5.12c	pi001	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.626941919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780094	2539668	2541710	276223	278205	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC343.11c	pht1	msc1	pi001	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.071396169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780095	2539668	2539667	276223	276222	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC13G1.08c	pht1	ash2	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.38290891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780096	2539668	2542126	276223	278602	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC1B3.05	pht1	not3	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783045294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780097	2539668	2538873	276223	275452	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC306.11	pht1	SPCC306.11	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.499620256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780098	2539668	2542946	276223	279386	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC6F12.03c	pht1	fsv1	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.922671253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780099	2539668	2538849	276223	275430	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC330.14c	pht1	rpl2402	pi001	rpl24-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443989061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780100	2539668	2540077	276223	276615	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC17D11.04c	pht1	nto1	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.487755536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780101	2539668	2539958	276223	276502	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC1718.07c	pht1	zfs1	pi001	moc4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.379644225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780102	2539668	2542254	276223	278724	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC30D11.04c	pht1	nup124	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382610621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780103	2539668	2541900	276223	278390	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC23H4.17c	pht1	srb10	pi001	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.103297897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780104	2539668	2542519	276223	278977	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC19G12.08	pht1	scs7	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.617091217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780105	2539668	5802861	276223	857999	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC1D4.01	pht1	tls1	pi001	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.186398253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780106	2539668	2541536	276223	278036	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC1071.02	pht1	mms19	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.323016157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780107	2539668	2539402	276223	275967	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC613.03	pht1	SPCC613.03	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.551978016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780108	2539668	2540967	276223	277483	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC36B7.08c	pht1	SPBC36B7.08c	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.713058719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780109	2539668	2542597	276223	279051	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAP8A3.07c	pht1	SPAP8A3.07c	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.464427863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780110	2539668	2539427	276223	275992	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC663.15c	pht1	SPCC663.15c	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699421218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780111	2539668	2539421	276223	275986	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC794.11c	pht1	ent3	pi001	SPCC794.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.497335356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780112	2539668	2542255	276223	278725	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC57A7.08	pht1	pzh1	pi001	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.02865754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780113	2539668	2541337	276223	277848	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBP35G2.13c	pht1	swc2	pi001	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.611163909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780114	2539668	2538848	276223	275429	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC613.12c	pht1	raf1	pi001	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.397301716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780115	2539668	2542875	276223	279320	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC13G7.02c	pht1	ssa1	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.375186638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780116	2539668	2541713	276223	278208	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC3A12.12	pht1	atp11	pi001	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.963668305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780117	2539668	2540001	276223	276545	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC1289.13c	pht1	gmh6	pi001	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.280168036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780118	2539668	2542806	276223	279254	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC1610.01	pht1	saf5	pi001	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.152814728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780119	2539668	2542992	276223	279430	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC1071.09c	pht1	SPAC1071.09c	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.768136283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780120	2539668	2538762	276223	275345	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC306.04c	pht1	set1	pi001	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.058086533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780121	2539668	2542516	276223	278974	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC2F7.04	pht1	pmc2	pi001	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632368589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780122	2539668	2542286	276223	278754	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC1786.01c	pht1	ptl2	pi001	SPAC1786.01c|SPAC31G5.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.415471984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780123	2539668	2542883	276223	279328	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC1486.04c	pht1	alm1	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567002753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780124	2539668	2543304	276223	279728	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC6B12.12	pht1	tom70	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.372346218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780125	2539668	2538717	276223	275301	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC1235.02	pht1	bio2	pi001	SPCC320.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582940524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780126	2539668	2538966	276223	275540	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC18.10	pht1	SPCC18.10	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.212196068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780127	2539668	2539246	276223	275816	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC18.13	pht1	SPCC18.13	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.205198621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780128	2539668	2540725	276223	277248	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC215.14c	pht1	vps20	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.740445428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780129	2539668	2539346	276223	275912	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC569.04	pht1	SPCC569.04	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.508375138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780130	2539668	2541531	276223	278031	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC25A8.01c	pht1	fft3	pi001	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.009052458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780131	2539668	2541470	276223	277972	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAPYUG7.04c	pht1	rpb9	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780769229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780132	2539668	2542418	276223	278881	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC1805.07c	pht1	dad2	pi001	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.846468512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780133	2539668	2542250	276223	278720	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC17D4.03c	pht1	cis4	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.963447409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780134	2539668	2540936	276223	277452	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC800.05c	pht1	atb2	pi001	alp2|ban5|tub1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036304403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780135	2539668	2542786	276223	279235	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC15A10.07	pht1	SPAC15A10.07	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.847392886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780136	2539668	2539205	276223	275775	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC4B3.15	pht1	mid1	pi001	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442154304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780137	2539668	2539726	276223	276278	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC13E7.08c	pht1	leo1	pi001	SPBC13E7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.669612768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780138	2539668	2539178	276223	275749	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC1682.14	pht1	rpl1902	pi001	rpl19-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037082531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780139	2539668	2541806	276223	278297	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC4G8.13c	pht1	prz1	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.902457279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780140	2539668	2543387	276223	279809	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAPB1E7.02c	pht1	mcl1	pi001	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.756496417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780141	2539668	2538854	276223	275435	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCP1E11.05c	pht1	are2	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575671255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780142	2539668	2542886	276223	279331	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC1486.01	pht1	SPAC1486.01	pi001	sod2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.875093008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780143	2539668	2541869	276223	278359	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC22F3.13	pht1	tsc1	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.055913387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780144	2539668	2543372	276223	279794	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAPB1A10.09	pht1	ase1	pi001	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.073490711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780145	2539668	2543333	276223	279756	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC694.02	pht1	SPAC694.02	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.840653903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780146	2539668	2543090	276223	279523	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC1348.01	pht1	SPBC1348.01	pi001	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.568189189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780147	2539668	2542943	276223	279384	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC1348.03	pht1	SPBC1348.03	pi001	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700141741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780148	2539668	2542561	276223	279017	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC31G5.17c	pht1	rps1001	pi001	rps10-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.55689112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780149	2539668	2541576	276223	278073	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC1348.02	pht1	SPBC1348.02	pi001	SPAC1348.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.944060292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780150	2539668	2543646	276223	280060	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC821.07c	pht1	moc3	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.124110118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780151	2539668	2543616	276223	280030	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC4A8.09c	pht1	cwf21	pi001	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.846831061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780152	2541327	2539549	277839	276110	SPBP23A10.10	SPCC576.01c	ppk32	xan1	-	SPCC576.01c|SPCPB1C11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.374636906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780153	2541327	2539035	277839	275608	SPBP23A10.10	SPCC794.09c	ppk32	tef101	-	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.678050651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780154	2541327	2538993	277839	275567	SPBP23A10.10	SPCC162.12	ppk32	tco89	-	SPCC1753.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377673497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780155	2541327	5802945	277839	858083	SPBP23A10.10	SPAC19G12.16c	ppk32	adg2	-	SPAC23A1.01c|mug46	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.705624056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780156	2541327	2539420	277839	275985	SPBP23A10.10	SPCC970.07c	ppk32	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.203440734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780157	2541327	2541205	277839	277719	SPBP23A10.10	SPBC839.02	ppk32	SPBC839.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573759278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780158	2541327	2541500	277839	278002	SPBP23A10.10	SPAC227.18	ppk32	lys3	-	SPAC2F7.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.341027302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780159	2541327	2542816	277839	279263	SPBP23A10.10	SPAC4G8.11c	ppk32	atp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582249455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780160	2541327	2542714	277839	279167	SPBP23A10.10	SPAC5H10.06c	ppk32	adh4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576747989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780161	2541327	2543590	277839	280005	SPBP23A10.10	SPAC4C5.03	ppk32	SPAC4C5.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.474314667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780162	2541327	2540692	277839	277217	SPBP23A10.10	SPBC800.07c	ppk32	tsf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.323753611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780163	2541327	2539302	277839	275870	SPBP23A10.10	SPCC126.09	ppk32	zip2	-	SPCC126.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.910202793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780164	2541327	2542022	277839	278505	SPBP23A10.10	SPAC23A1.03	ppk32	apt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.186704236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780165	2541327	2540425	277839	276953	SPBP23A10.10	SPBC27.06c	ppk32	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.840809091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780166	2541327	2539792	277839	276342	SPBP23A10.10	SPBC1271.14	ppk32	SPBC1271.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.431614387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780167	2541327	2542220	277839	278694	SPBP23A10.10	SPAC1A6.03c	ppk32	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.624926551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780168	2541327	2538698	277839	275283	SPBP23A10.10	SPCC1442.02	ppk32	SPCC1442.02	-	SPCC1450.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510238721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780169	2541327	2540964	277839	277480	SPBP23A10.10	SPBC365.16	ppk32	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5783832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780170	2541327	2543144	277839	279576	SPBP23A10.10	SPAC3F10.05c	ppk32	mug113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.836785963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780171	2541327	2541160	277839	277675	SPBP23A10.10	SPBC725.09c	ppk32	hob3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.80781138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780172	2541327	2540400	277839	276928	SPBP23A10.10	SPBC28F2.02	ppk32	mep33	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572832926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780173	2541327	2541876	277839	278366	SPBP23A10.10	SPAP27G11.11c	ppk32	SPAP27G11.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568681324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780174	2541327	2543396	277839	279818	SPBP23A10.10	SPAC4D7.11	ppk32	dsc4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503623977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780175	2541327	2538873	277839	275452	SPBP23A10.10	SPCC306.11	ppk32	SPCC306.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256674433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780176	2541327	2539815	277839	276365	SPBP23A10.10	SPBC1105.02c	ppk32	lys4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.752952087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780177	2541327	2543253	277839	279681	SPBP23A10.10	SPAC8C9.05	ppk32	SPAC8C9.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.130517195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780178	2541327	2543236	277839	279664	SPBP23A10.10	SPAC8C9.04	ppk32	SPAC8C9.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.476521466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780179	2541327	2543311	277839	279735	SPBP23A10.10	SPAC977.15	ppk32	SPAC977.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770595562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780180	2541327	2540741	277839	277264	SPBP23A10.10	SPBC83.05	ppk32	SPBC83.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388239416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780181	2541327	2541793	277839	278284	SPBP23A10.10	SPAC22H10.02	ppk32	SPAC22H10.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580247551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780182	2541327	2540001	277839	276545	SPBP23A10.10	SPBC1289.13c	ppk32	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.059939786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780183	2541327	2541175	277839	277689	SPBP23A10.10	SPBC839.13c	ppk32	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639950741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780184	2541327	2539159	277839	275731	SPBP23A10.10	SPCC1235.01	ppk32	SPCC1235.01	-	SPCC320.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439616174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780185	2541327	2539998	277839	276542	SPBP23A10.10	SPBC16G5.03	ppk32	SPBC16G5.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.978790636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780186	2541327	2542386	277839	278850	SPBP23A10.10	SPAC1805.01c	ppk32	ppk6	-	SPAPJ736.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.923361333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780187	2541327	3361410	277839	280486	SPBP23A10.10	SPAC1527.01	ppk32	mok11	-	SPAC23D3.15	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.682693148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780188	2541327	2541806	277839	278297	SPBP23A10.10	SPAC4G8.13c	ppk32	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.078776812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780189	2541327	2542460	277839	278921	SPBP23A10.10	SPAC1F12.03c	ppk32	SPAC1F12.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.646696737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780190	2541327	2540309	277839	276839	SPBP23A10.10	SPBC21B10.13c	ppk32	yox1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317302463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780191	2541327	2542561	277839	279017	SPBP23A10.10	SPAC31G5.17c	ppk32	rps1001	-	rps10-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.315160549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780192	2541327	2540787	277839	277306	SPBP23A10.10	SPBC1921.07c	ppk32	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.445974804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780193	2542910	2538796	279353	275377	SPAC1486.03c	SPCC63.06	SPAC1486.03c	SPCC63.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091228402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780194	2542910	2540833	279353	277351	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC18H10.20c	SPAC1486.03c	any1	-	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.93147378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780195	2542910	2542066	279353	278543	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC227.05	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC227.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.341408617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780196	2542910	2542671	279353	279124	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC824.09c	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC824.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389424504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780197	2542910	2540901	279353	277417	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC4F6.16c	SPAC1486.03c	ero11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09552776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780198	2542910	2538896	279353	275474	SPAC1486.03c	SPCC584.11c	SPAC1486.03c	SPCC584.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.368015137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780199	2542910	2541438	279353	277943	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC23G3.10c	SPAC1486.03c	ssr3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.280614411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780200	2542910	2540474	279353	277002	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC26H8.09c	SPAC1486.03c	snf59	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.24160764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780201	2542910	2543572	279353	279987	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC4G8.04	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC4G8.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.139882361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780202	2542910	2539890	279353	276436	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC16C6.03c	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC16C6.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.975536769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780203	2542910	2540491	279353	277019	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC28E12.04	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.255058283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780204	2542910	2540664	279353	277189	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC215.02	SPAC1486.03c	bob1	-	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046245845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780205	2542910	2539564	279353	276125	SPAC1486.03c	SPCC550.12	SPAC1486.03c	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.919931258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780206	2542910	2539463	279353	276026	SPAC1486.03c	SPCC550.11	SPAC1486.03c	SPCC550.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.800918826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780207	2542910	2542696	279353	279149	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC29B12.03	SPAC1486.03c	spd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.269913614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780208	2542910	2540945	279353	277461	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC342.06c	SPAC1486.03c	rtt109	-	kat11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.802853302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780209	2542910	2539331	279353	275897	SPAC1486.03c	SPCC24B10.09	SPAC1486.03c	rps1702	-	rps17|rps17-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048737901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780210	2542910	2541781	279353	278274	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC23G3.07c	SPAC1486.03c	snf30	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779716146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780211	2542910	2542012	279353	278495	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC23C11.02c	SPAC1486.03c	rps23	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.02934063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780212	2542910	2542318	279353	278784	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC1486.03c	cph1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.021217253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780213	2542910	2543308	279353	279732	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC694.04c	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC694.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.445139743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780214	2542910	2540595	279353	277121	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC21C3.02c	SPAC1486.03c	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.544117897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780215	2542910	2539820	279353	276370	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC1709.13c	SPAC1486.03c	set10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101551779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780216	2542910	2539023	279353	275596	SPAC1486.03c	SPCC594.05c	SPAC1486.03c	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.331879678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780217	2542910	2543537	279353	279954	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC4D7.05	SPAC1486.03c	sum1	-	tif34	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.052624009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780218	2542910	2541801	279353	278292	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC1486.03c	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.575906488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780219	2542910	2540922	279353	277438	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC36.10	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC36.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.880185931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780220	2542910	2542873	279353	279318	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC9G1.02	SPAC1486.03c	wis4	-	wak1|wik1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.692238082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780221	2542910	2539999	279353	276543	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC1734.15	SPAC1486.03c	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.70294857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780222	2542910	2540452	279353	276980	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC2A9.11c	SPAC1486.03c	iss9	-	SPBC2A9.11c|SPBC2D10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.560238818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780223	2542910	2541532	279353	278032	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC2C4.15c	SPAC1486.03c	ubx2	-	ucp13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.050301886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780224	2542910	2543396	279353	279818	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC1486.03c	dsc4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.820038518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780225	2542910	2539667	279353	276222	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC1486.03c	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.026395976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780226	2542910	2540997	279353	277513	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC1486.03c	pof9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.6752138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780227	2542910	2542946	279353	279386	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC6F12.03c	SPAC1486.03c	fsv1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.826829642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780228	2542910	2540290	279353	276821	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC29A3.02c	SPAC1486.03c	his7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.354793755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780229	2542910	2539224	279353	275794	SPAC1486.03c	SPCC16A11.01	SPAC1486.03c	SPCC16A11.01	-	SPCC63.15	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.10588136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780230	2542910	2543378	279353	279800	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC3H8.07c	SPAC1486.03c	pac10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090976677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780231	2542910	2542254	279353	278724	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC30D11.04c	SPAC1486.03c	nup124	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.857840755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780232	2542910	2540318	279353	276848	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC30B4.04c	SPAC1486.03c	sol1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.693299879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780233	2542910	2539215	279353	275785	SPAC1486.03c	SPCC285.16c	SPAC1486.03c	msh6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.99847801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780234	2542910	2539953	279353	276497	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC1709.11c	SPAC1486.03c	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.620432284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780235	2542910	2542437	279353	278899	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC17A5.01	SPAC1486.03c	pex6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.88266361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780236	2542910	2543443	279353	279863	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC3H1.12c	SPAC1486.03c	snt2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.333015391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780237	2542910	2539317	279353	275883	SPAC1486.03c	SPCC16A11.08	SPAC1486.03c	atg20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864453321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780238	2542910	2542597	279353	279051	SPAC1486.03c	SPAP8A3.07c	SPAC1486.03c	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.089268892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780239	2542910	2540533	279353	277061	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC29A10.16c	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.392910735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780240	2542910	2542060	279353	278538	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC23C11.14	SPAC1486.03c	zhf1	-	zhf	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03805375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780241	2542910	2539993	279353	276537	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC1105.05	SPAC1486.03c	exg1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.052490825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780242	2542910	2540930	279353	277446	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC354.10	SPAC1486.03c	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.762325838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780243	2542910	2541742	279353	278236	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC22H10.09	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC22H10.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.18111667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780244	2542910	2541963	279353	278449	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC21E11.04	SPAC1486.03c	aca1	-	ppr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.822172982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780245	2542910	3361520	279353	280596	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC1610.02c	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.267716724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780246	2542910	2539906	279353	276452	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC16G5.17	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC16G5.17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925569979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780247	2542910	2540910	279353	277426	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC577.02	SPAC1486.03c	rpl3801	-	rpl38-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816983278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780248	2542910	2541156	279353	277671	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC685.07c	SPAC1486.03c	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.412563144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780249	2542910	2538762	279353	275345	SPAC1486.03c	SPCC306.04c	SPAC1486.03c	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.993988467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780250	2542910	2540779	279353	277298	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC19F8.06c	SPAC1486.03c	meu22	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.259365099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780251	2542910	2538966	279353	275540	SPAC1486.03c	SPCC18.10	SPAC1486.03c	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.987357903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780252	2542910	2542940	279353	279381	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC31A2.12	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC31A2.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442133857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780253	2542910	2541531	279353	278031	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1486.03c	fft3	-	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816939569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780254	2542910	2539013	279353	275586	SPAC1486.03c	SPCC364.03	SPAC1486.03c	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.258302566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780255	2542910	2539359	279353	275925	SPAC1486.03c	SPCC16C4.06c	SPAC1486.03c	pus3	-	SPCC16C4.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.323431644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780256	2542910	2541229	279353	277743	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC839.05c	SPAC1486.03c	rps1701	-	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812590545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780257	2542910	2542904	279353	279348	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC144.11	SPAC1486.03c	rps1102	-	rps11|rps11-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.033874414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780258	2542910	2538861	279353	275441	SPAC1486.03c	SPCC1620.11	SPAC1486.03c	nup97	-	mug87	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149007407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780259	2542910	2540766	279353	277286	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC19C2.02	SPAC1486.03c	pmt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.49963539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780260	2542910	2539014	279353	275587	SPAC1486.03c	SPCC18B5.05c	SPAC1486.03c	SPCC18B5.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.727850936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780261	2542910	2542104	279353	278580	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC869.02c	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC869.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.158793839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780262	2542910	2541867	279353	278357	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC1486.03c	sck2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.157211026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780263	2542910	2541124	279353	277639	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC646.02	SPAC1486.03c	cwf11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.720448472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780264	2542910	2540649	279353	277174	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC19F8.08	SPAC1486.03c	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.93533421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780265	2542878	2540060	279323	276598	SPAC57A10.09c	SPBC106.01	nhp6	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.941372348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780266	2542878	2539930	279323	276474	SPAC57A10.09c	SPBC1198.11c	nhp6	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.435068962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780267	2542878	2542701	279323	279154	SPAC57A10.09c	SPAC26H5.05	nhp6	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452384291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780268	2542878	2543103	279323	279535	SPAC57A10.09c	SPAC3F10.09	nhp6	SPAC3F10.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.435487824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780269	2542878	2542555	279323	279012	SPAC57A10.09c	SPAC1952.06c	nhp6	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.356614634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780270	2542878	2539381	279323	275947	SPAC57A10.09c	SPCC1739.10	nhp6	mug33	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.338242999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780271	2542878	2539293	279323	275861	SPAC57A10.09c	SPCC553.08c	nhp6	ria1	-	SPCC553.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.869564177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780272	2542878	2542597	279323	279051	SPAC57A10.09c	SPAP8A3.07c	nhp6	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.119248022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780273	2542878	2540946	279323	277462	SPAC57A10.09c	SPBC36.04	nhp6	cys11	-	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640154532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780274	2542878	2541175	279323	277689	SPAC57A10.09c	SPBC839.13c	nhp6	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.393190971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780275	2542878	2542566	279323	279022	SPAC57A10.09c	SPAC8C9.12c	nhp6	SPAC8C9.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324332346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780276	2541292	2542895	277804	279339	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC13G6.10c	sdh4	asl1	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98667256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780277	2541292	2539788	277804	276338	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC17D1.02	sdh4	dph2	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.99088572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780278	2541292	2541656	277804	278152	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC25H1.06	sdh4	pcf3	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.514827728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780279	2541292	2543637	277804	280051	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC3H8.02	sdh4	csr102	tim18	SPAC3H8.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986353072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780280	2541292	2543634	277804	280048	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC3H8.04	sdh4	SPAC3H8.04	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.466189632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780281	2541292	2542812	277804	279259	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC6F6.01	sdh4	cch1	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.206593519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780282	2541292	2542643	277804	279097	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC2C4.07c	sdh4	dis32	tim18	SPAC2C4.07c|dis3L2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039209456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780283	2541292	2539227	277804	275797	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC191.11	sdh4	inv1	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992285516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780284	2541292	2542831	277804	279278	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC20H4.08	sdh4	whi2	tim18	SPAC20H4.08|SPAC145.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093668948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780285	2541292	2539930	277804	276474	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC1198.11c	sdh4	reb1	tim18	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.046557527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780286	2541292	2541002	277804	277517	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC3E7.07c	sdh4	SPBC3E7.07c	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.183893913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780287	2541292	2542492	277804	278951	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC1B9.02c	sdh4	sck1	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.666357942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780288	2541292	2542701	277804	279154	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC26H5.05	sdh4	mga2	tim18	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.998637848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780289	2541292	2541584	277804	278081	SPBP23A10.16	SPAP32A8.02	sdh4	SPAP32A8.02	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.258893471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780290	2541292	2542892	277804	279336	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC13F5.04c	sdh4	vta1	tim18	SPAC13F5.04c|new6|SPAC13F5.08|vts1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330973368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780291	2541292	2542613	277804	279067	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC18B11.03c	sdh4	SPAC18B11.03c	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.463516068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780292	2541292	2538806	277804	275387	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC1840.09	sdh4	SPCC1840.09	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.832629875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780293	2541292	2541891	277804	278381	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC1F8.03c	sdh4	str3	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.689162573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780294	2541292	3361375	277804	280451	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC212.06c	sdh4	SPAC212.06c	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044638158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780295	2541292	2541208	277804	277722	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC887.04c	sdh4	lub1	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64748099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780296	2541292	2539735	277804	276287	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC1773.04	sdh4	SPBC1773.04	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044354747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780297	2541292	2539443	277804	276006	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC736.02	sdh4	SPCC736.02	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572466579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780298	2541292	2541019	277804	277534	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC3B8.07c	sdh4	dsd1	tim18	SDCB3B8.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.404720261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780299	2541292	2541500	277804	278002	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC227.18	sdh4	lys3	tim18	SPAC2F7.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706875293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780300	2541292	2542816	277804	279263	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC4G8.11c	sdh4	atp10	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632361574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780301	2541292	2538801	277804	275382	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC285.13c	sdh4	nup60	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.623210112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780302	2541292	2542569	277804	279025	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC186.08c	sdh4	SPAC186.08c	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983569733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780303	2541292	2539256	277804	275826	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC285.04	sdh4	SPCC285.04	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985884345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780304	2541292	2542848	277804	279294	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC9G1.03c	sdh4	rpl3001	tim18	rpl30|rpl30-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.337275081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780305	2541292	2540692	277804	277217	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC800.07c	sdh4	tsf1	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447434617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780306	2541292	2543030	277804	279466	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC12B10.10	sdh4	nod1	tim18	SPAC12B10.10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852923431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780307	2541292	3361385	277804	280461	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC1639.02c	sdh4	trk2	tim18	SPAC1F5.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045241792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780308	2541292	2539314	277804	275880	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC548.05c	sdh4	dbl5	tim18	SPCC548.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321352422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780309	2541292	2539138	277804	275710	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC663.06c	sdh4	osr1	tim18	SPCC663.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.870250842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780310	2541292	2542022	277804	278505	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC23A1.03	sdh4	apt1	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201727115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780311	2541292	2540425	277804	276953	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC27.06c	sdh4	mgr2	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.50555067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780312	2541292	2539792	277804	276342	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC1271.14	sdh4	SPBC1271.14	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.9551994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780313	2541292	2539721	277804	276274	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC146.04	sdh4	SPBC146.04	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931934029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780314	2541292	2539823	277804	276373	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC16A3.18	sdh4	cip1	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.809449841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780315	2541292	2540364	277804	276893	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC29B5.02c	sdh4	isp4	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390899702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780316	2541292	2542649	277804	279103	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC24C9.14	sdh4	otu1	tim18	mug141	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.344231617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780317	2541292	2538698	277804	275283	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC1442.02	sdh4	SPCC1442.02	tim18	SPCC1450.18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873836441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780318	2541292	2542082	277804	278559	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC29B12.10c	sdh4	pgt1	tim18	opt1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988521214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780319	2541292	2542253	277804	278723	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC17H9.04c	sdh4	SPAC17H9.04c	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.502607342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780320	2541292	2539478	277804	276041	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC550.07	sdh4	SPCC550.07	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.128090934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780321	2541292	2542558	277804	279014	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC1952.07	sdh4	rad1	tim18	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.91880029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780322	2541292	2540964	277804	277480	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC365.16	sdh4	SPBC365.16	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.467938711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780323	2541292	2542568	277804	279024	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC1952.02	sdh4	tma23	tim18	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.983129334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780324	2541292	2539023	277804	275596	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC594.05c	sdh4	spf1	tim18	spp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.103502024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780325	2541292	2543349	277804	279771	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC977.02	sdh4	SPAC977.02	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.55176729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780326	2541292	2539339	277804	275905	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC1494.03	sdh4	arz1	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.009825122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780327	2541292	2542177	277804	278652	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC17H9.08	sdh4	SPAC17H9.08	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440529498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780328	2541292	2539003	277804	275577	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC1442.17c	sdh4	ist1	tim18	SPCC285.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095293836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780329	2541292	2541801	277804	278292	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC2F7.08c	sdh4	snf5	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776695988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780330	2541292	2541249	277804	277763	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC947.01	sdh4	alf1	tim18	SPBC947.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090727557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780331	2541292	2538715	277804	275299	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC1223.05c	sdh4	rpl3702	tim18	rpl37|rpl37-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701981906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780332	2541292	2541237	277804	277751	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC947.04	sdh4	pfl3	tim18	SPBC947.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145464197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780333	2541292	2543144	277804	279576	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC3F10.05c	sdh4	mug113	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.283903817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780334	2541292	2538770	277804	275353	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC1753.02c	sdh4	git3	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.508322159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780335	2541292	2540338	277804	276867	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC2G2.13c	sdh4	dcd1	tim18	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.684126486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780336	2541292	2541543	277804	278043	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC5H10.04	sdh4	SPAC5H10.04	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.225642604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780337	2541292	2543638	277804	280052	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC3H8.09c	sdh4	nab3	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.568479914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780338	2541292	2541911	277804	278401	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC212.04c	sdh4	SPAC212.04c	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865578484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780339	2541292	2541876	277804	278366	SPBP23A10.16	SPAP27G11.11c	sdh4	SPAP27G11.11c	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.129635077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780340	2541292	2542876	277804	279321	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC9G1.04	sdh4	oxa101	tim18	oxa1|oxa1-1|oxa1sp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441792011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780341	2541292	2541109	277804	277624	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC6B1.02	sdh4	ppk30	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.403840683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780342	2541292	2541166	277804	277681	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC725.15	sdh4	ura5	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.921939569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780343	2541292	2541183	277804	277697	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC725.14	sdh4	arg6	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.570299384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780344	2541292	2543117	277804	279549	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC806.08c	sdh4	mod21	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77356785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780345	2541292	2539603	277804	276161	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC1289.06c	sdh4	ppr8	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.051144006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780346	2541292	2542860	277804	279306	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC8C9.09c	sdh4	mug129	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.81644293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780347	2541292	2540772	277804	277292	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC216.04c	sdh4	mxr2	tim18	SPBC216.04c|MsrB	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864152283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780348	2541292	2540231	277804	276763	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC336.14c	sdh4	ppk26	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.926145901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780349	2541292	2538958	277804	275532	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC24B10.20	sdh4	SPCC24B10.20	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042252001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780350	2541292	2543406	277804	279828	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC9.12c	sdh4	atp12	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.91950335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780351	2541292	2540350	277804	276879	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC317.01	sdh4	mbx2	tim18	pvg4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81037124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780352	2541292	2538769	277804	275352	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC126.04c	sdh4	sgf73	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.318496101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780353	2541292	2540136	277804	276673	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC1347.11	sdh4	sro1	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870082842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780354	2541292	2539000	277804	275574	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC1450.06c	sdh4	grx3	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991324478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780355	2541292	2540256	277804	276787	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC32F12.12c	sdh4	SPBC32F12.12c	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040888215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780356	2541292	2540371	277804	276900	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC36.11	sdh4	SPBC36.11	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703505996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780357	2541292	2541607	277804	278104	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC24B11.10c	sdh4	cfh1	tim18	chr3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870402913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780358	2541292	2541588	277804	278085	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC1565.03	sdh4	SPAC1565.03	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093325537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780359	2541292	2539224	277804	275794	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC16A11.01	sdh4	SPCC16A11.01	tim18	SPCC63.15	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.102053144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780360	2541292	2543378	277804	279800	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC3H8.07c	sdh4	pac10	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385093792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780361	2541292	2540374	277804	276903	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC31F10.02	sdh4	SPBC31F10.02	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042320598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780362	2541292	2539027	277804	275600	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC1322.08	sdh4	srk1	tim18	mkp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979870401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780363	2541292	2542055	277804	278534	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC6G9.03c	sdh4	mug183	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506140126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780364	2541292	2543119	277804	279551	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC3A11.07	sdh4	nde2	tim18	SPAC3A11.07	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.982462015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780365	2541292	2539317	277804	275883	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC16A11.08	sdh4	atg20	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.976337152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780366	2541292	2541281	277804	277794	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC902.04	sdh4	rmn1	tim18	SPBC902.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570164933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780367	2541292	2542242	277804	278713	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC18G6.04c	sdh4	shm2	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810295155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780368	2541292	2541186	277804	277700	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC725.01	sdh4	SPBC725.01	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.431663865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780369	2541292	2542865	277804	279310	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC144.01	sdh4	SPAC144.01	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.839810618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780370	2541292	3361030	277804	280106	SPBP23A10.16	SPCP20C8.03	sdh4	SPCP20C8.03	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045905092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780371	2541292	2539812	277804	276362	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC1347.02	sdh4	fkbp39	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.711532535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780372	2541292	2541378	277804	277889	SPBP23A10.16	SPBP8B7.21	sdh4	ubp3	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.418749552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780373	2541292	2540691	277804	277216	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC20F10.05	sdh4	nrl1	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.770006078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780374	2541292	2541963	277804	278449	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC21E11.04	sdh4	aca1	tim18	ppr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.218643978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780375	2541292	2543193	277804	279622	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC3F10.11c	sdh4	abc2	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.024366219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780376	2541292	2538848	277804	275429	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC613.12c	sdh4	raf1	tim18	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.558213264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780377	2541292	3361520	277804	280596	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC1610.02c	sdh4	SPAC1610.02c	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.257578185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780378	2541292	2540946	277804	277462	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC36.04	sdh4	cys11	tim18	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447173828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780379	2541292	2540743	277804	277266	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC215.06c	sdh4	SPBC215.06c	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.8098852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780380	2541292	2542625	277804	279079	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC24H6.11c	sdh4	SPAC24H6.11c	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.933727213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780381	2541292	2541713	277804	278208	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC3A12.12	sdh4	atp11	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.000631099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780382	2541292	2542806	277804	279254	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC1610.01	sdh4	saf5	tim18	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.850301802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780383	2541292	2543391	277804	279813	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC4G9.09c	sdh4	arg11	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382300056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780384	2541292	2540519	277804	277047	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC21C3.14c	sdh4	SPBC21C3.14c	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815598313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780385	2541292	2539082	277804	275654	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC126.03	sdh4	pus1	tim18	lps1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391692876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780386	2541292	2539555	277804	276116	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC4B3.08	sdh4	lsg1	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.802150218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780387	2541292	2539438	277804	276001	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC4B3.07	sdh4	nro1	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.849857816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780388	2541292	2541175	277804	277689	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC839.13c	sdh4	rpl1601	tim18	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.40743308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780389	2541292	2538761	277804	275344	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC622.02	sdh4	SPCC622.02	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.273127855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780390	2541292	2540498	277804	277026	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC27.02c	sdh4	ask1	tim18	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.567014781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780391	2541292	2543304	277804	279728	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC6B12.12	sdh4	tom70	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.475808354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780392	2541292	2543136	277804	279568	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC1348.07	sdh4	SPBC1348.07	tim18	SPAC1348.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.99220508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780393	2541292	2542940	277804	279381	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC31A2.12	sdh4	SPAC31A2.12	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869636076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780394	2541292	2538756	277804	275339	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC1795.10c	sdh4	SPCC1795.10c	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.981443339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780395	2541292	2542355	277804	278820	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC29A4.13	sdh4	SPAC29A4.13	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990363866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780396	2541292	2542418	277804	278881	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC1805.07c	sdh4	dad2	tim18	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446011116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780397	2541292	2538916	277804	275493	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC16C4.17	sdh4	mug123	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.87627741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780398	2541292	2542051	277804	278530	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC23C11.06c	sdh4	SPAC23C11.06c	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320309748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780399	2541292	3361329	277804	280405	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC25H2.10c	sdh4	SPBC25H2.10c	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930399169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780400	2541292	2541149	277804	277664	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC651.03c	sdh4	gyp10	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989701017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780401	2541292	2542918	277804	279359	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC12G12.12	sdh4	SPAC12G12.12	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331141173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780402	2541292	2543437	277804	279857	SPBP23A10.16	SPAPB1A10.14	sdh4	pof15	tim18	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581899221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780403	2541292	2540182	277804	276715	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC16G5.06	sdh4	SPBC16G5.06	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041653873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780404	2541292	2543582	277804	279997	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC4H3.06	sdh4	SPAC4H3.06	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.447598494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780405	2541292	2543672	277804	280086	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC4H3.01	sdh4	SPAC4H3.01	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.330911179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780406	2541292	3361511	277804	280587	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC23C4.08	sdh4	rho3	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514220532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780407	2541292	2543380	277804	279802	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC4G9.16c	sdh4	rpl901	tim18	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388297946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780408	2541292	2543337	277804	279760	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC959.08	sdh4	rpl2102	tim18	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.280690751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780409	2541292	2538803	277804	275384	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC757.11c	sdh4	SPCC757.11c	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381540306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780410	2541292	2538861	277804	275441	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC1620.11	sdh4	nup97	tim18	mug87	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923667511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780411	2541292	2539181	277804	275752	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC622.14	sdh4	SPCC622.14	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039049637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780412	2541292	2543387	277804	279809	SPBP23A10.16	SPAPB1E7.02c	sdh4	mcl1	tim18	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978622129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780413	2541292	2542159	277804	278635	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC1834.09	sdh4	mug51	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147549705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780414	2541292	2542995	277804	279433	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC105.01c	sdh4	kha1	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.869525687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780415	2541292	2538854	277804	275435	SPBP23A10.16	SPCP1E11.05c	sdh4	are2	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569788581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780416	2541292	2538981	277804	275555	SPBP23A10.16	SPCC330.06c	sdh4	pmp20	tim18	SPCC330.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.617153473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780417	2541292	2540360	277804	276889	SPBP23A10.16	SPBC2G5.01	sdh4	SPBC2G5.01	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.514042928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780418	2541292	2542104	277804	278580	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC869.02c	sdh4	SPAC869.02c	tim18	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450014404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780419	2541292	2541334	277804	277845	SPBP23A10.16	SPBP4H10.18c	sdh4	SPBP4H10.18c	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923522605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780420	2541292	2541478	277804	277980	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC2F7.17	sdh4	mrf1	tim18	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.409360938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780421	2541292	2539450	277804	276013	SPBP23A10.16	SPCP31B10.04	sdh4	SPCP31B10.04	tim18	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873857273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780422	2541292	2542561	277804	279017	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC31G5.17c	sdh4	rps1001	tim18	rps10-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443384499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780423	2541292	2542571	277804	279027	SPBP23A10.16	SPAC589.02c	sdh4	med13	tim18	spTrap240|srb9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.023208806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780424	2543319	2538796	279743	275377	SPAC6B12.09	SPCC63.06	trm10	SPCC63.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582587103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780425	2543319	2542862	279743	279308	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC140.03	trm10	arb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.999234764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780426	2543319	2542598	279743	279052	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC6G10.08	trm10	idp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.324146648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780427	2543319	2541512	279743	278013	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC11E3.08c	trm10	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.758659607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780428	2543319	2543064	279743	279497	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC3G6.01	trm10	hrp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.014927028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780429	2543319	2539097	279743	275669	SPAC6B12.09	SPCC757.04	trm10	SPCC757.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.250966179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780430	2543319	2543356	279743	279778	SPAC6B12.09	SPAPB2C8.01	trm10	SPAPB2C8.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453271899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780431	2543319	2541316	279743	277828	SPAC6B12.09	SPBP19A11.02c	trm10	SPBP19A11.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864421904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780432	2543319	2538847	279743	275428	SPAC6B12.09	SPCC594.06c	trm10	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323730676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780433	2543319	2541019	279743	277534	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC3B8.07c	trm10	dsd1	-	SDCB3B8.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814118261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780434	2543319	2539510	279743	276072	SPAC6B12.09	SPCC4G3.04c	trm10	coq5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.071189328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780435	2543319	2539575	279743	276135	SPAC6B12.09	SPCP20C8.02c	trm10	SPCP20C8.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.689900473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780436	2543319	2541119	279743	277634	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC651.11c	trm10	apm3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.564878487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780437	2543319	2541530	279743	278030	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC57A10.10c	trm10	sla1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.233260647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780438	2543319	2542022	279743	278505	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC23A1.03	trm10	apt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985816063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780439	2543319	2541323	279743	277835	SPAC6B12.09	SPBP35G2.14	trm10	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.254379933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780440	2543319	2542318	279743	278784	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC16C9.05	trm10	cph1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.347938143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780441	2543319	2542969	279743	279409	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC4G8.10	trm10	gos1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.33000338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780442	2543319	2540595	279743	277121	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC21C3.02c	trm10	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.435584957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780443	2543319	2539175	279743	275746	SPAC6B12.09	SPCC16C4.01	trm10	sif2	-	SPCC5E4.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152275829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780444	2543319	2539129	279743	275701	SPAC6B12.09	SPCC338.14	trm10	ado1	-	SPCC338.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.922447593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780445	2543319	2543563	279743	279979	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC664.02c	trm10	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.654044511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780446	2543319	2541905	279743	278395	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC6G9.01c	trm10	SPAC6G9.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.297405444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780447	2543319	2540023	279743	276567	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC11C11.10	trm10	SPBC11C11.10	-	SPBC3B8.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.553985863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780448	2543319	2539574	279743	276134	SPAC6B12.09	SPCPB16A4.04c	trm10	trm8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.013957157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780449	2543319	2542558	279743	279014	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC1952.07	trm10	rad1	-	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.93821013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780450	2543319	2541379	279743	277890	SPAC6B12.09	SPBP8B7.27	trm10	mug30	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.374972601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780451	2543319	2541335	279743	277846	SPAC6B12.09	SPBP4G3.03	trm10	SPBP4G3.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092737729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780452	2543319	2539388	279743	275953	SPAC6B12.09	SPCC24B10.12	trm10	cgi121	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.527752992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780453	2543319	2542311	279743	278777	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC16A10.05c	trm10	dad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.576507061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780454	2543319	2541264	279743	277778	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC902.06	trm10	mto2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.259406229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780455	2543319	2539845	279743	276393	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC12C2.02c	trm10	ste20	-	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.31570585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780456	2543319	2542652	279743	279106	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC1687.15	trm10	gsk3	-	skp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.074932721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780457	2543319	2540886	279743	277403	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC4F6.10	trm10	vps901	-	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386753044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780458	2543319	2542921	279743	279362	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC1093.01	trm10	ppr5	-	SPAC12B10.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329126625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780459	2543319	2539999	279743	276543	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC1734.15	trm10	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.672542073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780460	2543319	2541388	279743	277899	SPAC6B12.09	SPBP8B7.30c	trm10	thi5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87091749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780461	2543319	2540086	279743	276624	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC16H5.12c	trm10	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922502921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780462	2543319	2543396	279743	279818	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC4D7.11	trm10	dsc4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.62933255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780463	2543319	2541187	279743	277701	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC776.14	trm10	plh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043915744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780464	2543319	2539667	279743	276222	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC13G1.08c	trm10	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.555200374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780465	2543319	2540200	279743	276733	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC1709.06	trm10	dus2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517851034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780466	2543319	2540665	279743	277190	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC83.02c	trm10	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.917164586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780467	2543319	2540997	279743	277513	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC3H7.06c	trm10	pof9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.814928707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780468	2543319	2542946	279743	279386	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC6F12.03c	trm10	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.88035077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780469	2543319	2540290	279743	276821	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC29A3.02c	trm10	his7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.502559981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780470	2543319	2542976	279743	279414	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC9E9.09c	trm10	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.199961772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780471	2543319	2540961	279743	277477	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC36B7.03	trm10	sec63	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.691833508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780472	2543319	2539224	279743	275794	SPAC6B12.09	SPCC16A11.01	trm10	SPCC16A11.01	-	SPCC63.15	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.270737604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780473	2543319	2540394	279743	276922	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC2D10.09	trm10	snr1	-	SPBC2D10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.978225916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780474	2543319	2538767	279743	275350	SPAC6B12.09	SPCC1672.12c	trm10	get4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.552188737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780475	2543319	2539715	279743	276268	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC1778.09	trm10	SPBC1778.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.131519759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780476	2543319	2543443	279743	279863	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC3H1.12c	trm10	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.132160724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780477	2543319	2540599	279743	277125	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC29A3.10c	trm10	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.323433506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780478	2543319	2541283	279743	277796	SPAC6B12.09	SPBP8B7.02	trm10	rng9	-	SPBP8B7.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983121634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780479	2543319	2540229	279743	276761	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC31F10.15c	trm10	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.118582171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780480	2543319	2538884	279743	275462	SPAC6B12.09	SPCC1393.08	trm10	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702840507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780481	2543319	2541488	279743	277990	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC227.17c	trm10	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.199713018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780482	2543319	2541746	279743	278240	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC20G4.04c	trm10	hus1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.582673791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780483	2543319	2540703	279743	277227	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC20F10.07	trm10	SPBC20F10.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042317224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780484	2543319	2542283	279743	278751	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC27F1.08	trm10	pdt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875078145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780485	2543319	2540442	279743	276970	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC25B2.04c	trm10	mtg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389433998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780486	2543319	2540862	279743	277379	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC4C3.06	trm10	syp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932662397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780487	2543319	2542767	279743	279217	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC1565.07c	trm10	knd1	-	SPAC1565.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036724895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780488	2543319	2541371	279743	277882	SPAC6B12.09	SPBP4H10.17c	trm10	SPBP4H10.17c	-	mrps2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041905383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780489	2543319	2540498	279743	277026	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC27.02c	trm10	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.414997959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780490	2543319	2538966	279743	275540	SPAC6B12.09	SPCC18.10	trm10	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.517982273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780491	2543319	2539246	279743	275816	SPAC6B12.09	SPCC18.13	trm10	SPCC18.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.57895297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780492	2543319	2540960	279743	277476	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC3D6.02	trm10	but2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511724469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780493	2543319	2541372	279743	277883	SPAC6B12.09	SPBP8B7.28c	trm10	stc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093461743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780494	2543319	2540699	279743	277223	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC800.08	trm10	gcd10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.260494447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780495	2543319	2538916	279743	275493	SPAC6B12.09	SPCC16C4.17	trm10	mug123	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440112441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780496	2543319	2543091	279743	279524	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC12G12.15	trm10	sif3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930782678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780497	2543319	2543602	279743	280017	SPAC6B12.09	SPAPB1A11.04c	trm10	mca1	-	SPAPB1A11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.617364817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780498	2543319	2540064	279743	276602	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC1718.02	trm10	hop1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.845935258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780499	2543319	2542416	279743	278880	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC589.03c	trm10	SPAC589.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321324982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780500	2543319	2542303	279743	278770	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC1687.21	trm10	SPAC1687.21	-	SPAC222.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152950884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780501	2543319	2540555	279743	277082	SPAC6B12.09	SPBP16F5.02	trm10	mcs2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.675009808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780502	2543319	2543633	279743	280047	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC3H8.05c	trm10	mms1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641329351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780503	2543319	2539375	279743	275941	SPAC6B12.09	SPCC4G3.11	trm10	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701614847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780504	2543319	2538840	279743	275421	SPAC6B12.09	SPCC736.07c	trm10	SPCC736.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.213124196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780505	2543319	2542059	279743	278537	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC328.06	trm10	ubp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934175219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780506	2543319	3361481	279743	280557	SPAC6B12.09	SPAPB24D3.05c	trm10	SPAPB24D3.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638171294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780507	2543319	2539767	279743	276318	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC1703.06	trm10	pof10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.836497938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780508	2543319	2543387	279743	279809	SPAC6B12.09	SPAPB1E7.02c	trm10	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.337036718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780509	2543319	2543327	279743	279750	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC1D4.06c	trm10	csk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045618064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780510	2543319	2540766	279743	277286	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC19C2.02	trm10	pmt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.917295004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780511	2543319	2539014	279743	275587	SPAC6B12.09	SPCC18B5.05c	trm10	SPCC18B5.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.369966437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780512	2543319	2542104	279743	278580	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC869.02c	trm10	SPAC869.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.618265174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780513	2543319	2543372	279743	279794	SPAC6B12.09	SPAPB1A10.09	trm10	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.899458921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780514	2543319	2540859	279743	277376	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC4C3.09	trm10	SPBC4C3.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816182113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780515	2543319	2542943	279743	279384	SPAC6B12.09	SPBC1348.03	trm10	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.408459473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780516	2543319	2542561	279743	279017	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC31G5.17c	trm10	rps1001	-	rps10-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.078932156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780517	2542938	2542969	279379	279409	SPAC6B12.08	SPAC4G8.10	mug185	gos1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.509956084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780518	2542938	2540836	279379	277354	SPAC6B12.08	SPBC18H10.19	mug185	vps38	-	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.502797189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780519	2542938	3361520	279379	280596	SPAC6B12.08	SPAC1610.02c	mug185	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099399737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780520	2542938	2540531	279379	277059	SPAC6B12.08	SPBC23E6.08	mug185	sat1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387922833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780521	2542938	2541675	279379	278171	SPAC6B12.08	SPAC22F8.12c	mug185	shf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.845722708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780522	2542938	2538854	279379	275435	SPAC6B12.08	SPCP1E11.05c	mug185	are2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986020329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780523	2539604	2542207	276162	278682	SPBC1105.14	SPAC17H9.10c	rsv2	ddb1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706323092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780524	2539604	2539147	276162	275719	SPBC1105.14	SPCC622.12c	rsv2	gdh1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512397445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780525	2539604	2543497	276162	279916	SPBC1105.14	SPAC926.09c	rsv2	fas1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.442026701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780526	2539604	2542598	276162	279052	SPBC1105.14	SPAC6G10.08	rsv2	idp1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574502211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780527	2539604	2542080	276162	278557	SPBC1105.14	SPAC27D7.03c	rsv2	mei2	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.911848846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780528	2539604	2540833	276162	277351	SPBC1105.14	SPBC18H10.20c	rsv2	any1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388032464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780529	2539604	2543637	276162	280051	SPBC1105.14	SPAC3H8.02	rsv2	csr102	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.915880289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780530	2539604	2541512	276162	278013	SPBC1105.14	SPAC11E3.08c	rsv2	nse6	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.749884571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780531	2539604	2539492	276162	276055	SPBC1105.14	SPCPB16A4.06c	rsv2	SPCPB16A4.06c	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.618520578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780532	2539604	2542066	276162	278543	SPBC1105.14	SPAC227.05	rsv2	SPAC227.05	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32865034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780533	2539604	2543064	276162	279497	SPBC1105.14	SPAC3G6.01	rsv2	hrp3	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.283226813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780534	2539604	2539930	276162	276474	SPBC1105.14	SPBC1198.11c	rsv2	reb1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.048287941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780535	2539604	2541438	276162	277943	SPBC1105.14	SPAC23G3.10c	rsv2	ssr3	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815346954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780536	2539604	3361436	276162	280512	SPBC1105.14	SPAC1296.01c	rsv2	SPAC1296.01c	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	SPAC22F3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775391834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780537	2539604	2539332	276162	275898	SPBC1105.14	SPCPB1C11.01	rsv2	amt1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.415939905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780538	2539604	3361375	276162	280451	SPBC1105.14	SPAC212.06c	rsv2	SPAC212.06c	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570859065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780539	2539604	2540975	276162	277491	SPBC1105.14	SPBC354.12	rsv2	gpd3	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.68320023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780540	2539604	2542563	276162	279019	SPBC1105.14	SPAC1952.11c	rsv2	ure2	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09884417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780541	2539604	2542677	276162	279130	SPBC1105.14	SPAC26F1.10c	rsv2	pyp1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.017508382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780542	2539604	2539510	276162	276072	SPBC1105.14	SPCC4G3.04c	rsv2	coq5	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.624058875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780543	2539604	2543542	276162	279959	SPBC1105.14	SPAC823.09c	rsv2	SPAC823.09c	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200885315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780544	2539604	2540676	276162	277201	SPBC1105.14	SPBC3E7.11c	rsv2	SPBC3E7.11c	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.441776154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780545	2539604	2541560	276162	278059	SPBC1105.14	SPAC24B11.12c	rsv2	SPAC24B11.12c	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.000478951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780546	2539604	2539792	276162	276342	SPBC1105.14	SPBC1271.14	rsv2	SPBC1271.14	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707063828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780547	2539604	2542180	276162	278655	SPBC1105.14	SPAC589.07c	rsv2	atg1801	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	atg18|atg18a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.774285733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780548	2539604	2541692	276162	278188	SPBC1105.14	SPAC29E6.07	rsv2	SPAC29E6.07	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	SPAC30.11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81527793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780549	2539604	2541960	276162	278447	SPBC1105.14	SPAC6G9.15c	rsv2	SPAC6G9.15c	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.131353542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780550	2539604	2542220	276162	278694	SPBC1105.14	SPAC1A6.03c	rsv2	SPAC1A6.03c	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380555036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780551	2539604	2542649	276162	279103	SPBC1105.14	SPAC24C9.14	rsv2	otu1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	mug141	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039696526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780552	2539604	2541522	276162	278023	SPBC1105.14	SPAC23E2.01	rsv2	fep1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.120941624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780553	2539604	2540714	276162	277237	SPBC1105.14	SPBC19C2.04c	rsv2	ubp11	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.473291207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780554	2539604	3361543	276162	280619	SPBC1105.14	SPAC9.13c	rsv2	cwf16	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	SPAPJ735.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.720921249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780555	2539604	2540964	276162	277480	SPBC1105.14	SPBC365.16	rsv2	SPBC365.16	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.552589273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780556	2539604	2543651	276162	280065	SPBC1105.14	SPAC644.11c	rsv2	pkp1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.204177797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780557	2539604	2542177	276162	278652	SPBC1105.14	SPAC17H9.08	rsv2	SPAC17H9.08	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38653545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780558	2539604	2539952	276162	276496	SPBC1105.14	SPBC1709.14	rsv2	SPBC1709.14	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867338255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780559	2539604	2538821	276162	275402	SPBC1105.14	SPCC584.01c	rsv2	SPCC584.01c	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.460016074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780560	2539604	2539355	276162	275921	SPBC1105.14	SPCC1840.08c	rsv2	pdi5	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	SPCC1840.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92964182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780561	2539604	2541801	276162	278292	SPBC1105.14	SPAC2F7.08c	rsv2	snf5	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635775596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780562	2539604	2540892	276162	277408	SPBC1105.14	SPBC530.01	rsv2	gyp1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446973336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780563	2539604	2542652	276162	279106	SPBC1105.14	SPAC1687.15	rsv2	gsk3	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	skp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.846925895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780564	2539604	2541160	276162	277675	SPBC1105.14	SPBC725.09c	rsv2	hob3	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.3275392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780565	2539604	2539984	276162	276528	SPBC1105.14	SPBC1289.11	rsv2	spf38	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	cwf17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38589894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780566	2539604	2543412	276162	279834	SPBC1105.14	SPAC637.07	rsv2	moe1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.624310432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780567	2539604	2539281	276162	275849	SPBC1105.14	SPCC132.03	rsv2	SPCC132.03	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817312813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780568	2539604	2539603	276162	276161	SPBC1105.14	SPBC1289.06c	rsv2	ppr8	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.385269213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780569	2539604	2540086	276162	276624	SPBC1105.14	SPBC16H5.12c	rsv2	SPBC16H5.12c	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.745016276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780570	2539604	2543244	276162	279672	SPBC1105.14	SPAC6B12.06c	rsv2	rrg9	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449528774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780571	2539604	2541955	276162	278442	SPBC1105.14	SPAC5D6.04	rsv2	SPAC5D6.04	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.336160185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780572	2539604	2538880	276162	275459	SPBC1105.14	SPCC1393.09c	rsv2	SPCC1393.09c	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.146693992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780573	2539604	2539974	276162	276518	SPBC1105.14	SPBC32H8.07	rsv2	git5	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988305784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780574	2539604	2541720	276162	278214	SPBC1105.14	SPAC23H3.13c	rsv2	gpa2	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	git8	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.918082038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780575	2539604	2543301	276162	279726	SPBC1105.14	SPAC977.17	rsv2	SPAC977.17	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.754487094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780576	2539604	2542549	276162	279006	SPBC1105.14	SPAC19A8.11c	rsv2	SPAC19A8.11c	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776247569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780577	2539604	2542519	276162	278977	SPBC1105.14	SPAC19G12.08	rsv2	scs7	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.416714324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780578	2539604	2542056	276162	278535	SPBC1105.14	SPAC6G9.14	rsv2	SPAC6G9.14	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98721045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780579	2539604	2540990	276162	277506	SPBC1105.14	SPBC36B7.06c	rsv2	mug20	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44208893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780580	2539604	2541389	276162	277900	SPBC1105.14	SPBPB2B2.09c	rsv2	SPBPB2B2.09c	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994434036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780581	2539604	2539936	276162	276480	SPBC1105.14	SPBC1685.05	rsv2	SPBC1685.05	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205988903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780582	2539604	2538780	276162	275361	SPBC1105.14	SPCC1840.07c	rsv2	SPCC1840.07c	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.151535993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780583	2539604	2541266	276162	277780	SPBC1105.14	SPBP16F5.05c	rsv2	yar1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	SPBP16F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320663483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780584	2539604	2539059	276162	275632	SPBC1105.14	SPCC737.06c	rsv2	SPCC737.06c	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453195048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780585	2539604	2540533	276162	277061	SPBC1105.14	SPBC29A10.16c	rsv2	SPBC29A10.16c	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.510578714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780586	2539604	2540687	276162	277212	SPBC1105.14	SPBC21D10.08c	rsv2	SPBC21D10.08c	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924956496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780587	2539604	2542255	276162	278725	SPBC1105.14	SPAC57A7.08	rsv2	pzh1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442910113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780588	2539604	2540193	276162	276726	SPBC1105.14	SPBC1289.10c	rsv2	adn2	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.054074479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780589	2539604	2542781	276162	279230	SPBC1105.14	SPAC57A10.12c	rsv2	ura3	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987932727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780590	2539604	2540926	276162	277442	SPBC1105.14	SPBC359.06	rsv2	mug14	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.37802471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780591	2539604	2543139	276162	279571	SPBC1105.14	SPAC12G12.03	rsv2	cip2	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987175475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780592	2539604	2539519	276162	276081	SPBC1105.14	SPCC364.05	rsv2	vps3	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189664882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780593	2539604	2542602	276162	279056	SPBC1105.14	SPAC186.09	rsv2	SPAC186.09	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769495642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780594	2539604	3361520	276162	280596	SPBC1105.14	SPAC1610.02c	rsv2	SPAC1610.02c	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582174268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780595	2539604	2541144	276162	277659	SPBC1105.14	SPBC685.06	rsv2	rps001	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503925967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780596	2539604	2542673	276162	279126	SPBC1105.14	SPAC26A3.11	rsv2	SPAC26A3.11	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.103420164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780597	2539604	2542875	276162	279320	SPBC1105.14	SPAC13G7.02c	rsv2	ssa1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042627545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780598	2539604	2541525	276162	278025	SPBC1105.14	SPAC27D7.02c	rsv2	SPAC27D7.02c	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.442426971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780599	2539604	2543113	276162	279545	SPBC1105.14	SPAC3F10.07c	rsv2	erf4	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	mug91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.70801474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780600	2539604	2542759	276162	279209	SPBC1105.14	SPAC9G1.07	rsv2	SPAC9G1.07	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.81909645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780601	2539604	2543670	276162	280084	SPBC1105.14	SPAPB1E7.06c	rsv2	eme1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.376929045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780602	2539604	2542881	276162	279326	SPBC1105.14	SPAC13F5.03c	rsv2	gld1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388281474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780603	2539604	2539030	276162	275603	SPBC1105.14	SPCP1E11.02	rsv2	ppk38	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.628771861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780604	2539604	2540152	276162	276688	SPBC1105.14	SPBC12C2.03c	rsv2	SPBC12C2.03c	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318966884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780605	2539604	2541027	276162	277542	SPBC1105.14	SPBC409.16c	rsv2	saw1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	SPBC409.16c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093238995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780606	2539604	2539159	276162	275731	SPBC1105.14	SPCC1235.01	rsv2	SPCC1235.01	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	SPCC320.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.34015387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780607	2539604	2541103	276162	277618	SPBC1105.14	SPBC651.06	rsv2	mug166	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	csa1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783643121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780608	2539604	2539013	276162	275586	SPBC1105.14	SPCC364.03	rsv2	rpl1702	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575756594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780609	2539604	2542418	276162	278881	SPBC1105.14	SPAC1805.07c	rsv2	dad2	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870862726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780610	2539604	2543457	276162	279877	SPBC1105.14	SPAC3H1.03	rsv2	mug151	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.117709197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780611	2539604	2542222	276162	278695	SPBC1105.14	SPAC31G5.18c	rsv2	sde2	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647312135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780612	2539604	2543183	276162	279612	SPBC1105.14	SPAC3A12.06c	rsv2	SPAC3A12.06c	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.383135736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780613	2539604	2539251	276162	275821	SPBC1105.14	SPCC24B10.02c	rsv2	SPCC24B10.02c	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5737143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780614	2539604	3361511	276162	280587	SPBC1105.14	SPAC23C4.08	rsv2	rho3	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505270784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780615	2539604	2543384	276162	279806	SPBC1105.14	SPAC637.06	rsv2	gmh5	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569325182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780616	2539604	2541774	276162	278268	SPBC1105.14	SPAC22E12.05c	rsv2	rer1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384468204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780617	2539604	2542175	276162	278650	SPBC1105.14	SPAC1F3.02c	rsv2	mkh1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510541273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780618	2539604	2541872	276162	278362	SPBC1105.14	SPAC23H4.10c	rsv2	thi4	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.14589869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780619	2539604	2541478	276162	277980	SPBC1105.14	SPAC2F7.17	rsv2	mrf1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576178606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780620	2539604	2539731	276162	276283	SPBC1105.14	SPBC1271.09	rsv2	SPBC1271.09	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.719867763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780621	2539604	2543090	276162	279523	SPBC1105.14	SPBC1348.01	rsv2	SPBC1348.01	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516770115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780622	2539604	2541359	276162	277870	SPBC1105.14	SPBPB2B2.05	rsv2	SPBPB2B2.05	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516957956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780623	2539604	2538696	276162	275281	SPBC1105.14	SPCC569.06	rsv2	SPCC569.06	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454298943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780624	2539604	3361295	276162	280371	SPBC1105.14	SPBC1921.01c	rsv2	rpl35b	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	rpl37|rpl37-1|rpl3701|SPBC29C10.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979837604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780625	2539604	2543501	276162	279919	SPBC1105.14	SPAC664.14	rsv2	amt2	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813067396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780626	2539604	2540320	276162	276850	SPBC1105.14	SPBC3D6.04c	rsv2	mad1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574229897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780627	2539604	2540734	276162	277257	SPBC1105.14	SPBC19G7.09	rsv2	ulp1	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.382787393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780628	2541773	2542502	278267	278960	SPAC23H4.02	SPAC139.06	ppk9	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325690133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780629	2541773	2543432	278267	279852	SPAC23H4.02	SPAC4G8.05	ppk9	ppk14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.370791963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780630	2541773	2538922	278267	275499	SPAC23H4.02	SPCC16C4.10	ppk9	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.303681463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780631	2541773	2538806	278267	275387	SPAC23H4.02	SPCC1840.09	ppk9	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378684983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780632	2541773	2542816	278267	279263	SPAC23H4.02	SPAC4G8.11c	ppk9	atp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516168476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780633	2541773	2539937	278267	276481	SPAC23H4.02	SPBC1539.08	ppk9	arf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.782185884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780634	2541773	2540993	278267	277509	SPAC23H4.02	SPBC342.01c	ppk9	alg6	-	SPBC3F6.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867218939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780635	2541773	2543584	278267	279999	SPAC23H4.02	SPAPB1E7.11c	ppk9	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324806554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780636	2541773	2542950	278267	279390	SPAC23H4.02	SPAC12B10.03	ppk9	bun62	-	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.200233818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780637	2541773	2540797	278267	277316	SPAC23H4.02	SPBC18H10.11c	ppk9	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.326993329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780638	2541773	2540673	278267	277198	SPAC23H4.02	SPBC1D7.03	ppk9	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.705240652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780639	2541773	2543346	278267	279768	SPAC23H4.02	SPAC688.14	ppk9	set13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.846890151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780640	2541773	2541142	278267	277657	SPAC23H4.02	SPBC725.04	ppk9	SPBC725.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.981572932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780641	2541773	2541536	278267	278036	SPAC23H4.02	SPAC1071.02	ppk9	mms19	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820367291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780642	2541773	2541296	278267	277808	SPAC23H4.02	SPBP8B7.06	ppk9	rpp201	-	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381788439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780643	2541773	2539359	278267	275925	SPAC23H4.02	SPCC16C4.06c	ppk9	pus3	-	SPCC16C4.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866106139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780644	2541773	2543337	278267	279760	SPAC23H4.02	SPAC959.08	ppk9	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330975233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780645	2541773	2541806	278267	278297	SPAC23H4.02	SPAC4G8.13c	ppk9	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.748946103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780646	2541773	2540451	278267	276979	SPAC23H4.02	SPBC2G2.17c	ppk9	SPBC2G2.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508081562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780647	2541773	2542890	278267	279334	SPAC23H4.02	SPAC13G6.14	ppk9	aps1	-	SPAC24B11.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325744438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780648	2541773	2538730	278267	275314	SPAC23H4.02	SPCC31H12.02c	ppk9	mug73	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.338521781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780649	2538758	2543565	275341	279981	SPCC1739.12	SPAPB24D3.04c	ppe1	mag1	esp1|ppx1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57544036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780650	2538758	2542986	275341	279424	SPCC1739.12	SPAC11D3.14c	ppe1	SPAC11D3.14c	esp1|ppx1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4061842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780651	2538758	2541045	275341	277560	SPCC1739.12	SPBC543.03c	ppe1	pku80	esp1|ppx1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.85366613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780652	2538758	2540425	275341	276953	SPCC1739.12	SPBC27.06c	ppe1	mgr2	esp1|ppx1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.065043168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780653	2538758	2542969	275341	279409	SPCC1739.12	SPAC4G8.10	ppe1	gos1	esp1|ppx1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508607955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780654	2538758	2540964	275341	277480	SPCC1739.12	SPBC365.16	ppe1	SPBC365.16	esp1|ppx1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642155831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780655	2538758	2542863	275341	279309	SPCC1739.12	SPAC13G7.04c	ppe1	mac1	esp1|ppx1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913270038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780656	2538758	2542611	275341	279065	SPCC1739.12	SPAC29A4.05	ppe1	cam2	esp1|ppx1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506522401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780657	2538758	2543406	275341	279828	SPCC1739.12	SPAC9.12c	ppe1	atp12	esp1|ppx1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.184680412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780658	2538758	2542032	275341	278514	SPCC1739.12	SPAC23C11.04c	ppe1	pnk1	esp1|ppx1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.448594401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780659	2538758	2541009	275341	277524	SPCC1739.12	SPBC428.04	ppe1	apq12	esp1|ppx1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.630268403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780660	2538758	2539519	275341	276081	SPCC1739.12	SPCC364.05	ppe1	vps3	esp1|ppx1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704926414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780661	2538758	3361520	275341	280596	SPCC1739.12	SPAC1610.02c	ppe1	SPAC1610.02c	esp1|ppx1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.187798822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780662	2538758	2540946	275341	277462	SPCC1739.12	SPBC36.04	ppe1	cys11	esp1|ppx1	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320044973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780663	2538758	2541713	275341	278208	SPCC1739.12	SPAC3A12.12	ppe1	atp11	esp1|ppx1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6354584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780664	2538758	2543304	275341	279728	SPCC1739.12	SPAC6B12.12	ppe1	tom70	esp1|ppx1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.131609517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780665	2538758	2542716	275341	279169	SPCC1739.12	SPAC25H1.07	ppe1	emc1	esp1|ppx1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2837881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780666	2538758	2543384	275341	279806	SPCC1739.12	SPAC637.06	ppe1	gmh5	esp1|ppx1	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645030413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780667	2538758	2541478	275341	277980	SPCC1739.12	SPAC2F7.17	ppe1	mrf1	esp1|ppx1	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.35178533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780668	2539998	2539050	276542	275623	SPBC16G5.03	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC16G5.03	rik1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.89330113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780669	2539998	2542585	276542	279040	SPBC16G5.03	SPAC31A2.13c	SPBC16G5.03	sft1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578638216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780670	2539998	2540251	276542	276783	SPBC16G5.03	SPBC336.05c	SPBC16G5.03	SPBC336.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.484421686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780671	2539998	2541560	276542	278059	SPBC16G5.03	SPAC24B11.12c	SPBC16G5.03	SPAC24B11.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932592459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780672	2539998	2542469	276542	278930	SPBC16G5.03	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC16G5.03	erg5	-	cyp61	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.942510842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780673	2539998	2542710	276542	279163	SPBC16G5.03	SPAC750.08c	SPBC16G5.03	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.636970475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780674	2538906	2542207	275483	278682	SPCC1259.03	SPAC17H9.10c	rpa12	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.425716044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780675	2538906	2539841	275483	276389	SPCC1259.03	SPBC17D1.05	rpa12	SPBC17D1.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.694613427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780676	2538906	2538961	275483	275535	SPCC1259.03	SPCC285.14	rpa12	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.089744923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780677	2538906	2542598	275483	279052	SPCC1259.03	SPAC6G10.08	rpa12	idp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.369833881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780678	2538906	2542382	275483	278846	SPCC1259.03	SPAC6G10.06	rpa12	SPAC6G10.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.315683049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780679	2538906	2542066	275483	278543	SPCC1259.03	SPAC227.05	rpa12	SPAC227.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.810024732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780680	2538906	2542378	275483	278842	SPCC1259.03	SPAC1805.04	rpa12	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.975550466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780681	2538906	2543524	275483	279942	SPCC1259.03	SPAC4D7.07c	rpa12	csi2	-	SPAC4D7.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851683916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780682	2538906	2540528	275483	277056	SPCC1259.03	SPBC18H10.04c	rpa12	sce3	-	tif48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.294942123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780683	2538906	2542237	275483	278709	SPCC1259.03	SPAC19E9.02	rpa12	fin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.005511416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780684	2538906	2539930	275483	276474	SPCC1259.03	SPBC1198.11c	rpa12	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.018332989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780685	2538906	2541853	275483	278344	SPCC1259.03	SPAC2F3.11	rpa12	SPAC2F3.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.4644268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780686	2538906	2542502	275483	278960	SPCC1259.03	SPAC139.06	rpa12	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.984282867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780687	2538906	2541345	275483	277856	SPCC1259.03	SPBP35G2.07	rpa12	ilv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.715013414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780688	2538906	2543201	275483	279630	SPCC1259.03	SPAC3F10.15c	rpa12	spo12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.250720026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780689	2538906	2541633	275483	278129	SPCC1259.03	SPAC664.01c	rpa12	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.437668593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780690	2538906	2540686	275483	277211	SPCC1259.03	SPBC21D10.10	rpa12	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.628909285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780691	2538906	2539890	275483	276436	SPCC1259.03	SPBC16C6.03c	rpa12	SPBC16C6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32324399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780692	2538906	2542103	275483	278579	SPCC1259.03	SPAC31G5.11	rpa12	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390251514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780693	2538906	2539309	275483	275876	SPCC1259.03	SPCC4G3.19	rpa12	alp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392133717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780694	2538906	2540664	275483	277189	SPCC1259.03	SPBC215.02	rpa12	bob1	-	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.298923322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780695	2538906	2539420	275483	275985	SPCC1259.03	SPCC970.07c	rpa12	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.80591679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780696	2538906	2541208	275483	277722	SPCC1259.03	SPBC887.04c	rpa12	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.048869661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780697	2538906	2541013	275483	277528	SPCC1259.03	SPBC3H7.13	rpa12	far10	-	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645962416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780698	2538906	2541012	275483	277527	SPCC1259.03	SPBC3H7.12	rpa12	rav2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.558188413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780699	2538906	2540979	275483	277495	SPCC1259.03	SPBC3H7.10	rpa12	elp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152642566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780700	2538906	2542273	275483	278742	SPCC1259.03	SPAC17H9.13c	rpa12	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.863836035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780701	2538906	2541682	275483	278178	SPCC1259.03	SPAC15F9.02	rpa12	seh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.140990119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780702	2538906	2539064	275483	275636	SPCC1259.03	SPCC126.06	rpa12	twf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378610242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780703	2538906	2540929	275483	277445	SPCC1259.03	SPBC354.03	rpa12	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.834704353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780704	2538906	2541346	275483	277857	SPCC1259.03	SPBP8B7.08c	rpa12	ppm1	-	SPBP8B7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.098441875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780705	2538906	2540463	275483	276991	SPCC1259.03	SPBC2F12.15c	rpa12	pfa3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.568669561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780706	2538906	2540993	275483	277509	SPCC1259.03	SPBC342.01c	rpa12	alg6	-	SPBC3F6.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.337879507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780707	2538906	2541424	275483	277929	SPCC1259.03	SPAC23G3.04	rpa12	ies4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504183076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780708	2538906	2542318	275483	278784	SPCC1259.03	SPAC16C9.05	rpa12	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.452057842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780709	2538906	2542277	275483	278746	SPCC1259.03	SPAC17A5.02c	rpa12	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.645371674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780710	2538906	2543685	275483	280099	SPCC1259.03	SPAC3C7.03c	rpa12	rad55	-	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580015833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780711	2538906	2540467	275483	276995	SPCC1259.03	SPBC2G2.07c	rpa12	mug178	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03678337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780712	2538906	2541707	275483	278202	SPCC1259.03	SPAC29E6.01	rpa12	pof11	-	SPAC30.05|mug156	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925761522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780713	2538906	2542189	275483	278664	SPCC1259.03	SPAC17A5.09c	rpa12	glc9	-	SPAC17A5.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039598132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780714	2538906	2540595	275483	277121	SPCC1259.03	SPBC21C3.02c	rpa12	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.000441569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780715	2538906	2541580	275483	278077	SPCC1259.03	SPAC1687.05	rpa12	pli1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.850514429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780716	2538906	2543563	275483	279979	SPCC1259.03	SPAC664.02c	rpa12	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.727866365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780717	2538906	2538866	275483	275446	SPCC1259.03	SPCC1620.12c	rpa12	SPCC1620.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.850985784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780718	2538906	2542530	275483	278988	SPCC1259.03	SPAC1399.02	rpa12	SPAC1399.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92861768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780719	2538906	2542253	275483	278723	SPCC1259.03	SPAC17H9.04c	rpa12	SPAC17H9.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.314465846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780720	2538906	2542981	275483	279419	SPCC1259.03	SPAC824.02	rpa12	bst1	-	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.846700851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780721	2538906	2540825	275483	277343	SPCC1259.03	SPBC428.08c	rpa12	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.06318371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780722	2538906	3361543	275483	280619	SPCC1259.03	SPAC9.13c	rpa12	cwf16	-	SPAPJ735.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.117201804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780723	2538906	2539310	275483	275877	SPCC1259.03	SPCC285.17	rpa12	spp27	-	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.436075155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780724	2538906	2542331	275483	278797	SPCC1259.03	SPAC1834.05	rpa12	alg9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145793511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780725	2538906	2539023	275483	275596	SPCC1259.03	SPCC594.05c	rpa12	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.863202829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780726	2538906	2542268	275483	278737	SPCC1259.03	SPAC17A5.07c	rpa12	ulp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.257205217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780727	2538906	2539467	275483	276030	SPCC1259.03	SPCC417.07c	rpa12	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778504577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780728	2538906	2542311	275483	278777	SPCC1259.03	SPAC16A10.05c	rpa12	dad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.656857174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780729	2538906	2543514	275483	279932	SPCC1259.03	SPAC4D7.03	rpa12	pop2	-	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.71038641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780730	2538906	2543020	275483	279456	SPCC1259.03	SPAC10F6.13c	rpa12	SPAC10F6.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.548644662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780731	2538906	2542964	275483	279404	SPCC1259.03	SPAC12G12.07c	rpa12	SPAC12G12.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.553972607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780732	2538906	2541237	275483	277751	SPCC1259.03	SPBC947.04	rpa12	pfl3	-	SPBC947.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.509155271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780733	2538906	2541250	275483	277764	SPCC1259.03	SPBC8D2.17	rpa12	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.328625175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780734	2538906	2542513	275483	278971	SPCC1259.03	SPAC1952.05	rpa12	gcn5	-	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.90065203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780735	2538906	2543144	275483	279576	SPCC1259.03	SPAC3F10.05c	rpa12	mug113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.947268265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780736	2538906	2541545	275483	278045	SPCC1259.03	SPAC22F8.07c	rpa12	rtf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809940278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780737	2538906	2542249	275483	278719	SPCC1259.03	SPAC30D11.14c	rpa12	SPAC30D11.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452351979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780738	2538906	2540338	275483	276867	SPCC1259.03	SPBC2G2.13c	rpa12	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.601775738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780739	2538906	2542123	275483	278599	SPCC1259.03	SPAC18G6.15	rpa12	mal3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.725610069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780740	2538906	2542507	275483	278965	SPCC1259.03	SPAC18G6.13	rpa12	SPAC18G6.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.978342485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780741	2538906	2540352	275483	276881	SPCC1259.03	SPBC215.03c	rpa12	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.442067174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780742	2538906	2543412	275483	279834	SPCC1259.03	SPAC637.07	rpa12	moe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.257738019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780743	2538906	2539733	275483	276285	SPCC1259.03	SPBC16E9.12c	rpa12	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.645819751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780744	2538906	2540673	275483	277198	SPCC1259.03	SPBC1D7.03	rpa12	mug80	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.393172868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780745	2538906	2542420	275483	278883	SPCC1259.03	SPAC19D5.03	rpa12	cid1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.226849871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780746	2538906	2539999	275483	276543	SPCC1259.03	SPBC1734.15	rpa12	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.865400756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780747	2538906	2541496	275483	277998	SPCC1259.03	SPAC23D3.09	rpa12	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.507440942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780748	2538906	2539857	275483	276404	SPCC1259.03	SPBC1604.20c	rpa12	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.736345366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780749	2538906	2540231	275483	276763	SPCC1259.03	SPBC336.14c	rpa12	ppk26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.133789999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780750	2538906	2539995	275483	276539	SPCC1259.03	SPBC1105.09	rpa12	ubc15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.072860737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780751	2538906	2538769	275483	275352	SPCC1259.03	SPCC126.04c	rpa12	sgf73	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.19850558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780752	2538906	2542126	275483	278602	SPCC1259.03	SPAC1B3.05	rpa12	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.893956616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780753	2538906	2542528	275483	278986	SPCC1259.03	SPAC1B3.08	rpa12	SPAC1B3.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.920831152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780754	2538906	2542007	275483	278490	SPCC1259.03	SPAC20H4.07	rpa12	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.524407042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780755	2538906	2540997	275483	277513	SPCC1259.03	SPBC3H7.06c	rpa12	pof9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.165199489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780756	2538906	2542710	275483	279163	SPCC1259.03	SPAC750.08c	rpa12	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.569393715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780757	2538906	2540256	275483	276787	SPCC1259.03	SPBC32F12.12c	rpa12	SPBC32F12.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.66681844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780758	2538906	2542946	275483	279386	SPCC1259.03	SPAC6F12.03c	rpa12	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.06516931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780759	2538906	2540290	275483	276821	SPCC1259.03	SPBC29A3.02c	rpa12	his7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.375174228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780760	2538906	2539232	275483	275802	SPCC1259.03	SPCC1223.04c	rpa12	set11	-	mug76	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.250311853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780761	2538906	2543378	275483	279800	SPCC1259.03	SPAC3H8.07c	rpa12	pac10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194585897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780762	2538906	2542254	275483	278724	SPCC1259.03	SPAC30D11.04c	rpa12	nup124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.438515657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780763	2538906	2542519	275483	278977	SPCC1259.03	SPAC19G12.08	rpa12	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.265597846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780764	2538906	2541009	275483	277524	SPCC1259.03	SPBC428.04	rpa12	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.021866144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780765	2538906	2542056	275483	278535	SPCC1259.03	SPAC6G9.14	rpa12	SPAC6G9.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.315861022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780766	2538906	2539119	275483	275691	SPCC1259.03	SPCC1223.13	rpa12	cbf12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.440231386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780767	2538906	2542055	275483	278534	SPCC1259.03	SPAC6G9.03c	rpa12	mug183	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.027084393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780768	2538906	2543443	275483	279863	SPCC1259.03	SPAC3H1.12c	rpa12	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.827802288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780769	2538906	2540201	275483	276734	SPCC1259.03	SPBC13A2.04c	rpa12	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.058334235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780770	2538906	2540967	275483	277483	SPCC1259.03	SPBC36B7.08c	rpa12	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.832236194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780771	2538906	2542597	275483	279051	SPCC1259.03	SPAP8A3.07c	rpa12	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817535949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780772	2538906	2540599	275483	277125	SPCC1259.03	SPBC29A3.10c	rpa12	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.22675486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780773	2538906	2540844	275483	277361	SPCC1259.03	SPBC1921.04c	rpa12	SPBC1921.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.272536003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780774	2538906	2540533	275483	277061	SPCC1259.03	SPBC29A10.16c	rpa12	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.832124858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780775	2538906	2542255	275483	278725	SPCC1259.03	SPAC57A7.08	rpa12	pzh1	-	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.399245251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780776	2538906	2538848	275483	275429	SPCC1259.03	SPCC613.12c	rpa12	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.010786738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780777	2538906	3361520	275483	280596	SPCC1259.03	SPAC1610.02c	rpa12	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.563019203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780778	2538906	2539538	275483	276100	SPCC1259.03	SPCC364.06	rpa12	nap1	-	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.93321914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780779	2538906	2539763	275483	276314	SPCC1259.03	SPBC1861.05	rpa12	SPBC1861.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384422379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780780	2538906	2540910	275483	277426	SPCC1259.03	SPBC577.02	rpa12	rpl3801	-	rpl38-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817277157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780781	2538906	2542806	275483	279254	SPCC1259.03	SPAC1610.01	rpa12	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.194638043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780782	2538906	2539354	275483	275920	SPCC1259.03	SPCC4F11.03c	rpa12	SPCC4F11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.505559957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780783	2538906	2542759	275483	279209	SPCC1259.03	SPAC9G1.07	rpa12	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.12671359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780784	2538906	2538762	275483	275345	SPCC1259.03	SPCC306.04c	rpa12	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.58706921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780785	2538906	2543051	275483	279486	SPCC1259.03	SPAC1071.08	rpa12	rpp203	-	rla6|rpp2-3|rpa2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099050521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780786	2538906	2541175	275483	277689	SPCC1259.03	SPBC839.13c	rpa12	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.417433327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780787	2538906	2541909	275483	278399	SPCC1259.03	SPAC227.01c	rpa12	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.23311132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780788	2538906	2540498	275483	277026	SPCC1259.03	SPBC27.02c	rpa12	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.528103962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780789	2538906	2542915	275483	279357	SPCC1259.03	SPAC6C3.06c	rpa12	SPAC6C3.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931733403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780790	2538906	2539925	275483	276469	SPCC1259.03	SPBC16H5.13	rpa12	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.022401313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780791	2538906	2543304	275483	279728	SPCC1259.03	SPAC6B12.12	rpa12	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.716462252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780792	2538906	2538962	275483	275536	SPCC1259.03	SPCC965.13	rpa12	SPCC965.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.267813615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780793	2538906	2541358	275483	277869	SPCC1259.03	SPBP4H10.16c	rpa12	SPBP4H10.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.304771036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780794	2538906	2543066	275483	279499	SPCC1259.03	SPAC343.12	rpa12	rds1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.82015054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780795	2538906	2540829	275483	277347	SPCC1259.03	SPBC800.09	rpa12	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.396050327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780796	2538906	2542418	275483	278881	SPCC1259.03	SPAC1805.07c	rpa12	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.956148693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780797	2538906	2542222	275483	278695	SPCC1259.03	SPAC31G5.18c	rpa12	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.626028198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780798	2538906	2539668	275483	276223	SPCC1259.03	SPBC11B10.10c	rpa12	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.211318616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780799	2538906	2541789	275483	278281	SPCC1259.03	SPAC23H4.08	rpa12	iwr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.098286721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780800	2538906	2543044	275483	279479	SPCC1259.03	SPAC3C7.12	rpa12	tip1	-	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.206287023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780801	2538906	2540333	275483	276863	SPCC1259.03	SPBC21B10.07	rpa12	SPBC21B10.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090241967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780802	2538906	2539375	275483	275941	SPCC1259.03	SPCC4G3.11	rpa12	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.502288756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780803	2538906	2539189	275483	275760	SPCC1259.03	SPCC1682.16	rpa12	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700337529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780804	2538906	2538861	275483	275441	SPCC1259.03	SPCC1620.11	rpa12	nup97	-	mug87	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.499680801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780805	2538906	2542716	275483	279169	SPCC1259.03	SPAC25H1.07	rpa12	emc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.465377078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780806	2538906	2543384	275483	279806	SPCC1259.03	SPAC637.06	rpa12	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.927442081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780807	2538906	2543277	275483	279705	SPCC1259.03	SPAC1002.03c	rpa12	gls2	-	gls2alpha	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042313288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780808	2538906	2543387	275483	279809	SPCC1259.03	SPAPB1E7.02c	rpa12	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.863667827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780809	2538906	2543471	275483	279891	SPCC1259.03	SPAC513.07	rpa12	SPAC513.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.588407829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780810	2538906	2543087	275483	279520	SPCC1259.03	SPAC30C2.04	rpa12	SPAC30C2.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.228128062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780811	2538906	2543372	275483	279794	SPCC1259.03	SPAPB1A10.09	rpa12	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.284090944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780812	2538906	2543333	275483	279756	SPCC1259.03	SPAC694.02	rpa12	SPAC694.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.976513147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780813	2538906	2538947	275483	275521	SPCC1259.03	SPCC1682.12c	rpa12	ubp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.130190128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780814	2538906	2542656	275483	279110	SPCC1259.03	SPAC2E1P3.05c	rpa12	SPAC2E1P3.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324724096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780815	2538906	2543472	275483	279892	SPCC1259.03	SPAC959.04c	rpa12	omh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.624169536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780816	2538906	2543463	275483	279883	SPCC1259.03	SPAPB21F2.03	rpa12	slx9	-	SPAPB21F2.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.089603022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780817	2538906	2540787	275483	277306	SPCC1259.03	SPBC1921.07c	rpa12	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.218421901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780818	2538906	2542836	275483	279282	SPCC1259.03	SPAC13G7.06	rpa12	met16	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807587625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780819	5802726	2542207	857864	278682	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC17H9.10c	spc19	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.439969863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780820	5802726	2542862	857864	279308	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC140.03	spc19	arb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504872009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780821	5802726	2540060	857864	276598	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC106.01	spc19	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.61123435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780822	5802726	2541512	857864	278013	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC11E3.08c	spc19	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.041825464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780823	5802726	2542066	857864	278543	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC227.05	spc19	SPAC227.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.381840946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780824	5802726	2542358	857864	278823	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC1782.09c	spc19	clp1	-	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.479247876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780825	5802726	2542378	857864	278842	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC1805.04	spc19	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.205315022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780826	5802726	2540528	857864	277056	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC18H10.04c	spc19	sce3	-	tif48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.192332099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780827	5802726	2542237	857864	278709	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC19E9.02	spc19	fin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.551486712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780828	5802726	2539930	857864	276474	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC1198.11c	spc19	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.118879862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780829	5802726	3361561	857864	280637	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC11E3.01c	spc19	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.820251159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780830	5802726	2541853	857864	278344	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC2F3.11	spc19	SPAC2F3.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.58228309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780831	5802726	2541856	857864	278347	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC23H3.08c	spc19	bub3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.262037428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780832	5802726	2541117	857864	277632	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC646.13	spc19	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.505385182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780833	5802726	2540161	857864	276696	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC13E7.03c	spc19	SPBC13E7.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.506775566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780834	5802726	2540694	857864	277218	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC19C7.10	spc19	bqt4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.457034046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780835	5802726	2539309	857864	275876	SPCC1223.15c	SPCC4G3.19	spc19	alp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.064107267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780836	5802726	2540664	857864	277189	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC215.02	spc19	bob1	-	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.237000877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780837	5802726	3361436	857864	280512	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC1296.01c	spc19	SPAC1296.01c	-	SPAC22F3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.047161939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780838	5802726	2543320	857864	279744	SPCC1223.15c	SPAPJ695.01c	spc19	SPAPJ695.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384474751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780839	5802726	2539420	857864	275985	SPCC1223.15c	SPCC970.07c	spc19	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.833907945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780840	5802726	2541200	857864	277714	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC8D2.03c	spc19	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.38652033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780841	5802726	2542468	857864	278929	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC1D4.09c	spc19	rtf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.253354369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780842	5802726	2541208	857864	277722	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC887.04c	spc19	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.447356172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780843	5802726	2538847	857864	275428	SPCC1223.15c	SPCC594.06c	spc19	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.617065998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780844	5802726	2541471	857864	277973	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC1F5.03c	spc19	SPAC1F5.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.57699025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780845	5802726	2539510	857864	276072	SPCC1223.15c	SPCC4G3.04c	spc19	coq5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508019475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780846	5802726	2539463	857864	276026	SPCC1223.15c	SPCC550.11	spc19	SPCC550.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.986594015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780847	5802726	2542848	857864	279294	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC9G1.03c	spc19	rpl3001	-	rpl30|rpl30-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.804927353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780848	5802726	2539434	857864	275997	SPCC1223.15c	SPCC757.09c	spc19	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.128000437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780849	5802726	2541026	857864	277541	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC337.09	spc19	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.598282685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780850	5802726	2539937	857864	276481	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC1539.08	spc19	arf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.334465209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780851	5802726	2539314	857864	275880	SPCC1223.15c	SPCC548.05c	spc19	dbl5	-	SPCC548.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441606782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780852	5802726	2540425	857864	276953	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC27.06c	spc19	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.85205194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780853	5802726	2541424	857864	277929	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC23G3.04	spc19	ies4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.561905414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780854	5802726	2542318	857864	278784	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC16C9.05	spc19	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.539309507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780855	5802726	2541560	857864	278059	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC24B11.12c	spc19	SPAC24B11.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.191903232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780856	5802726	2542277	857864	278746	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC17A5.02c	spc19	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.516983313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780857	5802726	2541580	857864	278077	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC1687.05	spc19	pli1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.620259166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780858	5802726	2543108	857864	279540	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC3A12.13c	spc19	SPAC3A12.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.334678395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780859	5802726	2539244	857864	275814	SPCC1223.15c	SPCC1672.06c	spc19	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.564814007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780860	5802726	2543563	857864	279979	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC664.02c	spc19	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.777443036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780861	5802726	2543584	857864	279999	SPCC1223.15c	SPAPB1E7.11c	spc19	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.437142336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780862	5802726	2543426	857864	279846	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC631.02	spc19	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.642174636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780863	5802726	2543078	857864	279511	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC31A2.15c	spc19	dcc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.33594374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780864	5802726	2538906	857864	275483	SPCC1223.15c	SPCC1259.03	spc19	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.861585724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780865	5802726	2540825	857864	277343	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC428.08c	spc19	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.874721184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780866	5802726	2539448	857864	276011	SPCC1223.15c	SPCC825.04c	spc19	naa40	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454872475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780867	5802726	2541021	857864	277536	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC3B8.10c	spc19	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.810551819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780868	5802726	2541544	857864	278044	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC22G7.06c	spc19	ura1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923822677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780869	5802726	2542268	857864	278737	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC17A5.07c	spc19	ulp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.482465044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780870	5802726	2542036	857864	278518	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC23A1.19c	spc19	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.381443662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780871	5802726	2543514	857864	279932	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC4D7.03	spc19	pop2	-	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.055716442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780872	5802726	2541885	857864	278375	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC22H10.03c	spc19	kap114	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.348197158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780873	5802726	2540631	857864	277157	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC25B2.10	spc19	SPBC25B2.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.062665197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780874	5802726	2543445	857864	279865	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC4F10.13c	spc19	mpd2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.265822467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780875	5802726	2540338	857864	276867	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC2G2.13c	spc19	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.772092189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780876	5802726	2542123	857864	278599	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC18G6.15	spc19	mal3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.068543897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780877	5802726	2540352	857864	276881	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC215.03c	spc19	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.836490524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780878	5802726	2540396	857864	276924	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC31F10.12	spc19	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.546079276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780879	5802726	2539219	857864	275789	SPCC1223.15c	SPCC1795.01c	spc19	mad3	-	SPCC895.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.300218774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780880	5802726	2539484	857864	276047	SPCC1223.15c	SPCC594.04c	spc19	SPCC594.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.716176004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780881	5802726	2543667	857864	280081	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC4H3.02c	spc19	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.971008153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780882	5802726	2539857	857864	276404	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC1604.20c	spc19	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.972986932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780883	5802726	2541532	857864	278032	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC2C4.15c	spc19	ubx2	-	ucp13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852427877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780884	5802726	2543643	857864	280057	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC3G9.07c	spc19	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.054316864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780885	5802726	2541899	857864	278389	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC22E12.11c	spc19	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.500517947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780886	5802726	2540231	857864	276763	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC336.14c	spc19	ppk26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.896537274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780887	5802726	2541710	857864	278205	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC343.11c	spc19	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.475319759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780888	5802726	2539667	857864	276222	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC13G1.08c	spc19	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.631852832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780889	5802726	2542126	857864	278602	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC1B3.05	spc19	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.706640945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780890	5802726	2542007	857864	278490	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC20H4.07	spc19	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.421357554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780891	5802726	2543244	857864	279672	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC6B12.06c	spc19	rrg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.057782174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780892	5802726	2540751	857864	277273	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC20F10.10	spc19	psl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.016473708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780893	5802726	2542976	857864	279414	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC9E9.09c	spc19	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.406824529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780894	5802726	2542419	857864	278882	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC17G6.05c	spc19	bro1	-	SPAC17G6.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.060256283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780895	5802726	2543378	857864	279800	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC3H8.07c	spc19	pac10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.857278082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780896	5802726	2541009	857864	277524	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC428.04	spc19	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451623469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780897	5802726	5802861	857864	857999	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC1D4.01	spc19	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.929598668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780898	5802726	2543443	857864	279863	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC3H1.12c	spc19	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.562549856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780899	5802726	2541389	857864	277900	SPCC1223.15c	SPBPB2B2.09c	spc19	SPBPB2B2.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.826308332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780900	5802726	2541464	857864	277966	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC222.08c	spc19	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.133440824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780901	5802726	2543307	857864	279731	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC694.05c	spc19	rps2502	-	rps25|rps25-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.680897195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780902	5802726	2540967	857864	277483	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC36B7.08c	spc19	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.097995819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780903	5802726	2539847	857864	276395	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC530.14c	spc19	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2080579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780904	5802726	2540599	857864	277125	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC29A3.10c	spc19	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714002269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780905	5802726	3361470	857864	280546	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC3G9.01	spc19	nsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.68181844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780906	5802726	2543315	857864	279739	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC6B12.07c	spc19	SPAC6B12.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.109177586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780907	5802726	2540533	857864	277061	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC29A10.16c	spc19	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.374731834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780908	5802726	2541488	857864	277990	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC227.17c	spc19	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.053209452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780909	5802726	2540193	857864	276726	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC1289.10c	spc19	adn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.737744321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780910	5802726	2541337	857864	277848	SPCC1223.15c	SPBP35G2.13c	spc19	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.613169239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780911	5802726	2539519	857864	276081	SPCC1223.15c	SPCC364.05	spc19	vps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445188255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780912	5802726	2540589	857864	277115	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC20F10.06	spc19	mad2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.061916135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780913	5802726	2541963	857864	278449	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC21E11.04	spc19	aca1	-	ppr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875581441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780914	5802726	2538848	857864	275429	SPCC1223.15c	SPCC613.12c	spc19	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.624014732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780915	5802726	3361520	857864	280596	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC1610.02c	spc19	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.31941278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780916	5802726	2539908	857864	276454	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC13E7.06	spc19	msd1	-	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.399192294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780917	5802726	2538762	857864	275345	SPCC1223.15c	SPCC306.04c	spc19	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.193829738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780918	5802726	2543628	857864	280042	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC3H8.10	spc19	spo20	-	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.432050546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780919	5802726	2543106	857864	279538	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC3A11.13	spc19	SPAC3A11.13	-	SPAC3H5.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.542989558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780920	5802726	2541909	857864	278399	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC227.01c	spc19	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779239698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780921	5802726	2540498	857864	277026	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC27.02c	spc19	ask1	-	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039534559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780922	5802726	2542881	857864	279326	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC13F5.03c	spc19	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.432274574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780923	5802726	2543304	857864	279728	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC6B12.12	spc19	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.830637098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780924	5802726	2541432	857864	277937	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC1F5.05c	spc19	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442459225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780925	5802726	2540089	857864	276627	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC32H8.01c	spc19	SPBC32H8.01c	-	SPBP22H7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.376425794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780926	5802726	2541531	857864	278031	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC25A8.01c	spc19	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.945849997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780927	5802726	2542418	857864	278881	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC1805.07c	spc19	dad2	-	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986864683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780928	5802726	2542826	857864	279273	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC13G6.09	spc19	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.850419434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780929	5802726	2539668	857864	276223	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC11B10.10c	spc19	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.236438299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780930	5802726	2540516	857864	277044	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC21C3.01c	spc19	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.795738757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780931	5802726	2540927	857864	277443	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC365.06	spc19	pmt3	-	smt3|ubl2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.25934101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780932	5802726	2541115	857864	277630	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC660.07	spc19	ntp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.31686562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780933	5802726	2543633	857864	280047	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC3H8.05c	spc19	mms1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.344218397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780934	5802726	2543046	857864	279481	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC3C7.10	spc19	pex13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.94256301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780935	5802726	2539702	857864	276255	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC1604.12	spc19	SPBC1604.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.505579242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780936	5802726	2539726	857864	276278	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC13E7.08c	spc19	leo1	-	SPBC13E7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.310143559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780937	5802726	2542904	857864	279348	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC144.11	spc19	rps1102	-	rps11|rps11-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.616717669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780938	5802726	2538840	857864	275421	SPCC1223.15c	SPCC736.07c	spc19	SPCC736.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.669380446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780939	5802726	2539189	857864	275760	SPCC1223.15c	SPCC1682.16	spc19	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.02497376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780940	5802726	2542021	857864	278504	SPCC1223.15c	SPAP14E8.02	spc19	tos4	-	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.611516207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780941	5802726	2542716	857864	279169	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC25H1.07	spc19	emc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767991365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780942	5802726	2543384	857864	279806	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC637.06	spc19	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.367971726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780943	5802726	2543387	857864	279809	SPCC1223.15c	SPAPB1E7.02c	spc19	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.115035385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780944	5802726	2541478	857864	277980	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC2F7.17	spc19	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.332053449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780945	5802726	2543448	857864	279868	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC3H5.07	spc19	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.500595045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780946	5802726	2542656	857864	279110	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC2E1P3.05c	spc19	SPAC2E1P3.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.686846264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780947	5802726	2541272	857864	277786	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC947.03c	spc19	naa38	-	mak31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.816378005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780948	5802726	2541297	857864	277809	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC9B6.07	spc19	nop52	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851114567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780949	5802726	2542617	857864	279071	SPCC1223.15c	SPAC13A11.01c	spc19	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578870082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780950	5802726	2540649	857864	277174	SPCC1223.15c	SPBC19F8.08	spc19	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.47168301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780951	2540064	2539949	276602	276493	SPBC1718.02	SPBC1703.04	hop1	mlh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.186749766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780952	2540064	2541051	276602	277566	SPBC1718.02	SPBC3E7.08c	hop1	rad13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.437352611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780953	2540064	2543661	276602	280075	SPBC1718.02	SPAC644.08	hop1	SPAC644.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.942118649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780954	2540064	2542677	276602	279130	SPBC1718.02	SPAC26F1.10c	hop1	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516930273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780955	2540064	2540415	276602	276943	SPBC1718.02	SPBC30B4.06c	hop1	SPBC30B4.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449669301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780956	2540064	2543319	276602	279743	SPBC1718.02	SPAC6B12.09	hop1	trm10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.845935258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780957	2540064	2540348	276602	276877	SPBC1718.02	SPBC29A10.05	hop1	exo1	-	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.345370142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780958	2540064	2540430	276602	276958	SPBC1718.02	SPBC25B2.01	hop1	SPBC25B2.01	-	SPBC2G5.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.741654196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780959	2540064	2540599	276602	277125	SPBC1718.02	SPBC29A3.10c	hop1	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.567575446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780960	2540064	2540460	276602	276988	SPBC1718.02	SPBC2A9.07c	hop1	hpz1	-	SPBC2A9.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580102318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780961	2540064	2542547	276602	279004	SPBC1718.02	SPACUNK4.09	hop1	SPACUNK4.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.511299467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780962	2540064	2539555	276602	276116	SPBC1718.02	SPCC4B3.08	hop1	lsg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.316861453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780963	2540064	2543304	276602	279728	SPBC1718.02	SPAC6B12.12	hop1	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.332800499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780964	2540064	2542294	276602	278762	SPBC1718.02	SPAC1805.09c	hop1	fmt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095802629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780965	2540064	2541531	276602	278031	SPBC1718.02	SPAC25A8.01c	hop1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517145648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780966	2540064	2540523	276602	277051	SPBC1718.02	SPBC29A10.10c	hop1	dbl8	-	SPBC29A10.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779851763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780967	2540064	2539726	276602	276278	SPBC1718.02	SPBC13E7.08c	hop1	leo1	-	SPBC13E7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441318258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780968	2540064	2539959	276602	276503	SPBC1718.02	SPBC1703.11	hop1	SPBC1703.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.050830231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780969	2540064	2541359	276602	277870	SPBC1718.02	SPBPB2B2.05	hop1	SPBPB2B2.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.772714167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780970	2540064	2540309	276602	276839	SPBC1718.02	SPBC21B10.13c	hop1	yox1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926611333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780971	2542632	2542869	279086	279314	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC140.02	cdc25	gar2	sal2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.915929626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780972	3361456	2543529	280532	279947	SPAC1142.03c	SPAC4C5.02c	swi2	ryh1	SPAC17G6.20c	hos1|sat7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.76791379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780973	3361456	2541912	280532	278402	SPAC1142.03c	SPAC222.16c	swi2	csn3	SPAC17G6.20c	SPAC821.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.066576924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780974	3361456	2540673	280532	277198	SPAC1142.03c	SPBC1D7.03	swi2	mug80	SPAC17G6.20c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.668681472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780975	3361456	2541531	280532	278031	SPAC1142.03c	SPAC25A8.01c	swi2	fft3	SPAC17G6.20c	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040578996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780976	2541531	2543497	278031	279916	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC926.09c	fft3	fas1	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819843516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780977	2541531	2541495	278031	277997	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAP8A3.02c	fft3	ofd2	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81320988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780978	2541531	2542895	278031	279339	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC13G6.10c	fft3	asl1	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991691071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780979	2541531	2538721	278031	275305	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1494.10	fft3	adn3	snf2SR	SPCC70.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.92939406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780980	2541531	2541562	278031	278061	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC24B11.05	fft3	SPAC24B11.05	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.617355306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780981	2541531	2539788	278031	276338	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC17D1.02	fft3	dph2	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.9209987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780982	2541531	2540060	278031	276598	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC106.01	fft3	mph1	snf2SR	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.655080251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780983	2541531	2541826	278031	278317	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC2G11.13	fft3	atg22	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384859734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780984	2541531	2542577	278031	279033	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC19G12.15c	fft3	tpp1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.386859486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780985	2541531	2541728	278031	278222	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC20G4.03c	fft3	hri1	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038104276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780986	2541531	2540789	278031	277308	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC19C2.06c	fft3	mug124	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045178414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780987	2541531	2542598	278031	279052	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC6G10.08	fft3	idp1	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933669635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780988	2541531	2540833	278031	277351	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC18H10.20c	fft3	any1	snf2SR	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.344063907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780989	2541531	2542518	278031	278976	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1B3.16c	fft3	vht1	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.482869555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780990	2541531	2541343	278031	277854	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBPB2B2.19c	fft3	SPBPB2B2.19c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820996819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780991	2541531	2543635	278031	280049	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3H8.03	fft3	img2	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.773747114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780992	2541531	2543634	278031	280048	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3H8.04	fft3	SPAC3H8.04	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.567028007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780993	2541531	2542143	278031	278619	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC17C9.07	fft3	alg8	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992009558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780994	2541531	2541512	278031	278013	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC11E3.08c	fft3	nse6	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.837834233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780995	2541531	2540913	278031	277429	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC56F2.08c	fft3	SPBC56F2.08c	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.861761965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780996	2541531	2539566	278031	276126	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC736.13	fft3	SPCC736.13	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.665729382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780997	2541531	2542066	278031	278543	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC227.05	fft3	SPAC227.05	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.550171448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780998	2541531	2541426	278031	277931	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC227.06	fft3	SPAC227.06	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865413438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
780999	2541531	2541912	278031	278402	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC222.16c	fft3	csn3	snf2SR	SPAC821.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.855713369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781000	2541531	2539684	278031	276239	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC16A3.16	fft3	SPBC16A3.16	snf2SR	cwc27	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.406850108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781001	2541531	2543064	278031	279497	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3G6.01	fft3	hrp3	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.972759267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781002	2541531	2540653	278031	277178	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC215.07c	fft3	SPBC215.07c	snf2SR	pdp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.59596836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781003	2541531	2540131	278031	276668	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1778.05c	fft3	SPBC1778.05c	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.62186206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781004	2541531	2539156	278031	275728	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1450.08c	fft3	wtf16	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712391829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781005	2541531	2541552	278031	278051	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1142.08	fft3	fhl1	snf2SR	SPAC8C9.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.170743658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781006	2541531	2542358	278031	278823	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1782.09c	fft3	clp1	snf2SR	flp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.660541065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781007	2541531	2542378	278031	278842	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1805.04	fft3	nup132	snf2SR	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.288046228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781008	2541531	2540995	278031	277511	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC337.16	fft3	cho1	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.658804944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781009	2541531	2540528	278031	277056	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC18H10.04c	fft3	sce3	snf2SR	tif48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.025929139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781010	2541531	2539282	278031	275850	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC622.06c	fft3	SPCC622.06c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818020735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781011	2541531	2538985	278031	275559	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC13B11.03c	fft3	SPCC13B11.03c	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.986810464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781012	2541531	2543339	278031	279762	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC630.13c	fft3	tsc2	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.665966294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781013	2541531	2538993	278031	275567	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC162.12	fft3	tco89	snf2SR	SPCC1753.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.061083231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781014	2541531	2541787	278031	278279	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC2E12.03c	fft3	SPAC2E12.03c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.620502366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781015	2541531	3361119	278031	280195	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC663.07c	fft3	SPCC663.07c	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711804698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781016	2541531	3361561	278031	280637	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC11E3.01c	fft3	swr1	snf2SR	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.87013309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781017	2541531	2541130	278031	277645	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC776.11	fft3	rpl2801	snf2SR	rpl28-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.275194153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781018	2541531	2538929	278031	275505	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC162.02c	fft3	SPCC162.02c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873897203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781019	2541531	2541822	278031	278313	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1F7.10	fft3	SPAC1F7.10	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195448249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781020	2541531	2539097	278031	275669	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC757.04	fft3	SPCC757.04	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.818135879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781021	2541531	2540410	278031	276938	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC2D10.04	fft3	SPBC2D10.04	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.778531371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781022	2541531	2540296	278031	276827	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC2D10.05	fft3	exg3	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.563457001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781023	2541531	2541856	278031	278347	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC23H3.08c	fft3	bub3	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8418014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781024	2541531	2541117	278031	277632	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC646.13	fft3	sds23	snf2SR	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.51002781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781025	2541531	2541051	278031	277566	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC3E7.08c	fft3	rad13	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.677173784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781026	2541531	2540161	278031	276696	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC13E7.03c	fft3	SPBC13E7.03c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870688733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781027	2541531	2539734	278031	276286	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1604.16c	fft3	SPBC1604.16c	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.012154681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781028	2541531	2543432	278031	279852	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC4G8.05	fft3	ppk14	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.747337109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781029	2541531	2540347	278031	276876	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC30B4.08	fft3	eri1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.678628263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781030	2541531	2543479	278031	279899	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC688.04c	fft3	gst3	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709377008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781031	2541531	2543527	278031	279945	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC4C5.01	fft3	SPAC4C5.01	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.309299965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781032	2541531	2540694	278031	277218	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC19C7.10	fft3	bqt4	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.91076256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781033	2541531	2540402	278031	276930	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC30D10.05c	fft3	SPBC30D10.05c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990478321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781034	2541531	2539800	278031	276350	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1347.13c	fft3	mrm1	snf2SR	SPBC1347.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.977879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781035	2541531	2540686	278031	277211	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC21D10.10	fft3	bdc1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.53903966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781036	2541531	2539201	278031	275772	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC188.09c	fft3	pfl4	snf2SR	SPCC188.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.315436679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781037	2541531	2539890	278031	276436	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC16C6.03c	fft3	SPBC16C6.03c	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.639189115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781038	2541531	2542103	278031	278579	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC31G5.11	fft3	pac2	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.669536204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781039	2541531	2539263	278031	275833	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC895.09c	fft3	ucp12	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714130357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781040	2541531	2540491	278031	277019	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC28E12.04	fft3	SPBC28E12.04	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.611316207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781041	2541531	2540535	278031	277062	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC215.01	fft3	SPBC215.01	snf2SR	SPBC3B9.20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.87981955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781042	2541531	2540664	278031	277189	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC215.02	fft3	bob1	snf2SR	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.126895768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781043	2541531	2543320	278031	279744	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAPJ695.01c	fft3	SPAPJ695.01c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.769442275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781044	2541531	2540999	278031	277515	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC4B4.04	fft3	SPBC4B4.04	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.693889902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781045	2541531	2541235	278031	277749	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC8D2.12c	fft3	SPBC8D2.12c	snf2SR	pI053	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.385943487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781046	2541531	3361570	278031	280646	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC750.01	fft3	SPAC750.01	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.078820165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781047	2541531	2539226	278031	275796	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC16C4.20c	fft3	SPCC16C4.20c	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.959791845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781048	2541531	2540975	278031	277491	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC354.12	fft3	gpd3	snf2SR	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.743124733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781049	2541531	2542468	278031	278929	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1D4.09c	fft3	rtf2	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580083172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781050	2541531	2542107	278031	278583	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC30.01c	fft3	sec72	snf2SR	sec7b|sec702	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641117531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781051	2541531	2542179	278031	278654	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC17C9.12	fft3	scs22	snf2SR	SPAC17C9.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871157075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781052	2541531	2542677	278031	279130	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC26F1.10c	fft3	pyp1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.170033331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781053	2541531	2539443	278031	276006	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC736.02	fft3	SPCC736.02	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.052535015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781054	2541531	2538775	278031	275357	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC23B6.05c	fft3	ssb3	snf2SR	rpa3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636169691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781055	2541531	2541092	278031	277607	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC660.12c	fft3	egt2	snf2SR	SPBC660.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095043321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781056	2541531	2542816	278031	279263	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC4G8.11c	fft3	atp10	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444324874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781057	2541531	2541498	278031	278000	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC227.10	fft3	SPAC227.10	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.695557161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781058	2541531	2539564	278031	276125	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC550.12	fft3	arp6	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.883705193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781059	2541531	2539463	278031	276026	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC550.11	fft3	SPCC550.11	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.578473493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781060	2541531	2539045	278031	275618	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1235.05c	fft3	fft2	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.88402985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781061	2541531	2538801	278031	275382	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC285.13c	fft3	nup60	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.892075981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781062	2541531	2542689	278031	279142	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC29B12.04	fft3	snz1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.229438809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781063	2541531	2542569	278031	279025	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC186.08c	fft3	SPAC186.08c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.92611969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781064	2541531	2539472	278031	276035	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC794.03	fft3	SPCC794.03	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.437012951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781065	2541531	2540945	278031	277461	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC342.06c	fft3	rtt109	snf2SR	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.477779175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781066	2541531	2540306	278031	276836	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC2G5.02c	fft3	ckb2	snf2SR	SPBC2G5.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.616567326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781067	2541531	2539434	278031	275997	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC757.09c	fft3	rnc1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.603981901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781068	2541531	2543111	278031	279543	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC806.07	fft3	ndk1	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.166750326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781069	2541531	2543453	278031	279873	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3G9.03	fft3	rpl2301	snf2SR	rpl23-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992213655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781070	2541531	2540692	278031	277217	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC800.07c	fft3	tsf1	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.339065026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781071	2541531	2541026	278031	277541	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC337.09	fft3	erg28	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923128927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781072	2541531	2540220	278031	276753	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC337.03	fft3	rhn1	snf2SR	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.890260289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781073	2541531	2543053	278031	279487	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC10F6.15	fft3	SPAC10F6.15	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.33773483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781074	2541531	2541541	278031	278041	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1F7.11c	fft3	SPAC1F7.11c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037340084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781075	2541531	2539797	278031	276347	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC16G5.14c	fft3	rps3	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.891785882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781076	2541531	2539575	278031	276135	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCP20C8.02c	fft3	SPCP20C8.02c	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.380019735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781077	2541531	2540160	278031	276695	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1773.17c	fft3	SPBC1773.17c	snf2SR	SPBP26C9.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321087988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781078	2541531	3361385	278031	280461	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1639.02c	fft3	trk2	snf2SR	SPAC1F5.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.411087688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781079	2541531	2542182	278031	278657	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC19B12.08	fft3	atg4	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.866345342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781080	2541531	2541346	278031	277857	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP8B7.08c	fft3	ppm1	snf2SR	SPBP8B7.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.202424136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781081	2541531	2541998	278031	278482	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC23A1.09	fft3	SPAC23A1.09	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.988907599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781082	2541531	2539063	278031	275635	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC126.12	fft3	SPCC126.12	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87689379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781083	2541531	2542022	278031	278505	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC23A1.03	fft3	apt1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.88167068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781084	2541531	3361342	278031	280418	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC16D10.07c	fft3	sir2	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.983255694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781085	2541531	2540425	278031	276953	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC27.06c	fft3	mgr2	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704979052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781086	2541531	2542318	278031	278784	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC16C9.05	fft3	cph1	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.560878091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781087	2541531	2539365	278031	275931	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC24B10.16c	fft3	SPCC24B10.16c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.337094627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781088	2541531	2541560	278031	278059	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC24B11.12c	fft3	SPAC24B11.12c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.714972911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781089	2541531	2540295	278031	276826	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC3B8.05	fft3	SPBC3B8.05	snf2SR	dph1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.765101974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781090	2541531	2543609	278031	280023	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC630.05	fft3	gyp7	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.839821852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781091	2541531	2539792	278031	276342	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1271.14	fft3	SPBC1271.14	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.226012133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781092	2541531	2540467	278031	276995	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC2G2.07c	fft3	mug178	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.279198759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781093	2541531	2539441	278031	276004	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCPJ732.02c	fft3	xks1	snf2SR	SPCPJ732.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.247011369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781094	2541531	2541692	278031	278188	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC29E6.07	fft3	SPAC29E6.07	snf2SR	SPAC30.11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810312189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781095	2541531	2541707	278031	278202	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC29E6.01	fft3	pof11	snf2SR	SPAC30.05|mug156	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.102134067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781096	2541531	2540595	278031	277121	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC21C3.02c	fft3	dep1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.503150349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781097	2541531	2541580	278031	278077	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1687.05	fft3	pli1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.312177505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781098	2541531	2539175	278031	275746	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC16C4.01	fft3	sif2	snf2SR	SPCC5E4.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.270589742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781099	2541531	2539822	278031	276372	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC16G5.02c	fft3	SPBC16G5.02c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8152886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781100	2541531	2543296	278031	279721	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC9E9.03	fft3	leu2	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.437458674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781101	2541531	2541195	278031	277709	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC839.17c	fft3	fkh1	snf2SR	SPBC24E9.17c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.871685274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781102	2541531	2542644	278031	279098	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC24C9.16c	fft3	cox8	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042267745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781103	2541531	2542146	278031	278622	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1B3.10c	fft3	SPAC1B3.10c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044447354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781104	2541531	2543641	278031	280055	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3H5.08c	fft3	SPAC3H5.08c	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.533444979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781105	2541531	2539244	278031	275814	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1672.06c	fft3	asp1	snf2SR	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380417717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781106	2541531	2542082	278031	278559	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC29B12.10c	fft3	pgt1	snf2SR	opt1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.274807034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781107	2541531	2541522	278031	278023	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC23E2.01	fft3	fep1	snf2SR	gaf2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.271053834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781108	2541531	2541905	278031	278395	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC6G9.01c	fft3	SPAC6G9.01c	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.473057911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781109	2541531	2539352	278031	275918	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC188.07	fft3	ccq1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.004500863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781110	2541531	2543078	278031	279511	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC31A2.15c	fft3	dcc1	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.459566368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781111	2541531	2540415	278031	276943	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC30B4.06c	fft3	SPBC30B4.06c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.401033518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781112	2541531	2542230	278031	278703	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1B3.06c	fft3	SPAC1B3.06c	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.406979908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781113	2541531	2538700	278031	275285	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC645.13	fft3	SPCC645.13	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.204822306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781114	2541531	2538972	278031	275546	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1739.15	fft3	wtf21	snf2SR	wtf3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.987403292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781115	2541531	3361456	278031	280532	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1142.03c	fft3	swi2	snf2SR	SPAC17G6.20c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040578996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781116	2541531	2540825	278031	277343	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC428.08c	fft3	clr4	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.476290238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781117	2541531	2541926	278031	278414	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC222.14c	fft3	SPAC222.14c	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.093809288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781118	2541531	2541683	278031	278179	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC22G7.03	fft3	SPAC22G7.03	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866288292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781119	2541531	2542558	278031	279014	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1952.07	fft3	rad1	snf2SR	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.602139538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781120	2541531	2541021	278031	277536	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC3B8.10c	fft3	nem1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.272444442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781121	2541531	2539310	278031	275877	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC285.17	fft3	spp27	snf2SR	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.745057521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781122	2541531	2542568	278031	279024	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1952.02	fft3	tma23	snf2SR	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.255146073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781123	2541531	2543573	278031	279988	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC869.11	fft3	cat1	snf2SR	SPAC922.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.76617767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781124	2541531	2539023	278031	275596	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC594.05c	fft3	spf1	snf2SR	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.785973704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781125	2541531	2539032	278031	275605	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC4B3.05c	fft3	hem12	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.770868484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781126	2541531	2542036	278031	278518	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC23A1.19c	fft3	hrq1	snf2SR	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.851581454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781127	2541531	2541687	278031	278183	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1F7.06	fft3	hsp3105	snf2SR	SPAC1F7.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.100320507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781128	2541531	2543349	278031	279771	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC977.02	fft3	SPAC977.02	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093642249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781129	2541531	2542311	278031	278777	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC16A10.05c	fft3	dad1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.80424564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781130	2541531	2539339	278031	275905	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1494.03	fft3	arz1	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.772535736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781131	2541531	2543514	278031	279932	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC4D7.03	fft3	pop2	snf2SR	sud1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.815214293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781132	2541531	2542679	278031	279132	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC12B10.07	fft3	acp1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.816322379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781133	2541531	2542950	278031	279390	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC12B10.03	fft3	bun62	snf2SR	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.398560023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781134	2541531	2538821	278031	275402	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC584.01c	fft3	SPCC584.01c	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.257595768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781135	2541531	2540797	278031	277316	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC18H10.11c	fft3	ppr2	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.875096869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781136	2541531	2540631	278031	277157	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC25B2.10	fft3	SPBC25B2.10	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.04454824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781137	2541531	2542964	278031	279404	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC12G12.07c	fft3	SPAC12G12.07c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923832945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781138	2541531	2541801	278031	278292	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC2F7.08c	fft3	snf5	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.471488269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781139	2541531	2541249	278031	277763	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC947.01	fft3	alf1	snf2SR	SPBC947.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.751259402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781140	2541531	2543461	278031	279881	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC521.03	fft3	SPAC521.03	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090307907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781141	2541531	2540892	278031	277408	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC530.01	fft3	gyp1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.376522589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781142	2541531	2542298	278031	278765	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC29A4.02c	fft3	SPAC29A4.02c	snf2SR	tef3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.937203705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781143	2541531	2542513	278031	278971	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1952.05	fft3	gcn5	snf2SR	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.614101685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781144	2541531	2542646	278031	279100	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC11H11.05c	fft3	fta6	snf2SR	sma6	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.194205336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781145	2541531	2541982	278031	278467	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC23A1.06c	fft3	cmk2	snf2SR	mkp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.291943246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781146	2541531	2538770	278031	275353	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1753.02c	fft3	git3	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.048054859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781147	2541531	2539628	278031	276185	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1604.03c	fft3	SPBC1604.03c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.51788624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781148	2541531	2542652	278031	279106	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1687.15	fft3	gsk3	snf2SR	skp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.040546418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781149	2541531	2539198	278031	275769	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC18.09c	fft3	hnt3	snf2SR	SPCC18.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81658069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781150	2541531	2540429	278031	276957	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC29A10.07	fft3	pom152	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.981638441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781151	2541531	2538706	278031	275290	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC338.08	fft3	ctp1	snf2SR	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.915977554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781152	2541531	2540352	278031	276881	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC215.03c	fft3	csn1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.016615633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781153	2541531	2539754	278031	276306	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC16C6.04	fft3	dbl6	snf2SR	SPBC16C6.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328658435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781154	2541531	2539733	278031	276285	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC16E9.12c	fft3	pab2	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.04752704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781155	2541531	2540673	278031	277198	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1D7.03	fft3	mug80	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.298698769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781156	2541531	2540150	278031	276687	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC16E9.14c	fft3	zrg17	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.123013116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781157	2541531	2540363	278031	276892	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC2F12.09c	fft3	atf21	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.476313761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781158	2541531	2539898	278031	276444	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC12D12.07c	fft3	trx2	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.433563173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781159	2541531	2542494	278031	278953	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC19D5.07	fft3	uga1	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926300165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781160	2541531	2541889	278031	278379	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC2F7.03c	fft3	pom1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.938771647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781161	2541531	2543208	278031	279637	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC328.04	fft3	SPAC328.04	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.553641961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781162	2541531	2540886	278031	277403	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC4F6.10	fft3	vps901	snf2SR	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.345929172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781163	2541531	2539219	278031	275789	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1795.01c	fft3	mad3	snf2SR	SPCC895.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324010479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781164	2541531	2542817	278031	279264	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC13G6.02c	fft3	rps101	snf2SR	rps1-1|rps3a-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.460937071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781165	2541531	2542921	278031	279362	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1093.01	fft3	ppr5	snf2SR	SPAC12B10.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.413456817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781166	2541531	2539999	278031	276543	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1734.15	fft3	rsc4	snf2SR	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.842604302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781167	2541531	2541496	278031	277998	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC23D3.09	fft3	arp42	snf2SR	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.454717729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781168	2541531	2543313	278031	279737	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAPJ691.03	fft3	SPAPJ691.03	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709044075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781169	2541531	2543667	278031	280081	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC4H3.02c	fft3	swc3	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.497572197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781170	2541531	2541183	278031	277697	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC725.14	fft3	arg6	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.264106055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781171	2541531	2543246	278031	279674	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAPB8E5.05	fft3	mfm1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.702811464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781172	2541531	2543358	278031	279780	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC688.10	fft3	rev3	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043430812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781173	2541531	2538871	278031	275450	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1259.14c	fft3	meu27	snf2SR	B8647-6	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819090867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781174	2541531	2541352	278031	277863	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBPJ4664.03	fft3	mfm3	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.702460516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781175	2541531	2541532	278031	278032	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC2C4.15c	fft3	ubx2	snf2SR	ucp13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.132062219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781176	2541531	2543643	278031	280057	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3G9.07c	fft3	hos2	snf2SR	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.2627804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781177	2541531	2541899	278031	278389	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC22E12.11c	fft3	set3	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.55947092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781178	2541531	2538890	278031	275468	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1393.02c	fft3	spt2	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.341511722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781179	2541531	2540086	278031	276624	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC16H5.12c	fft3	SPBC16H5.12c	snf2SR	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.079290943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781180	2541531	2540231	278031	276763	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC336.14c	fft3	ppk26	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.70574068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781181	2541531	2541710	278031	278205	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC343.11c	fft3	msc1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.02252213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781182	2541531	2541351	278031	277862	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP4H10.14c	fft3	SPBP4H10.14c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045592833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781183	2541531	2541187	278031	277701	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC776.14	fft3	plh1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.501976138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781184	2541531	2541401	278031	277910	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBPB10D8.05c	fft3	SPBPB10D8.05c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.415039865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781185	2541531	2541830	278031	278321	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC5H10.01	fft3	SPAC5H10.01	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097756304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781186	2541531	2542782	278031	279231	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1687.06c	fft3	rpl44	snf2SR	rpl28	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807801158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781187	2541531	3361269	278031	280345	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC31A8.01c	fft3	rtn1	snf2SR	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.327992657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781188	2541531	2542126	278031	278602	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1B3.05	fft3	not3	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.584293318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781189	2541531	2539000	278031	275574	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1450.06c	fft3	grx3	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386978212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781190	2541531	2540194	278031	276727	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1709.09	fft3	rrf1	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.97303914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781191	2541531	2542710	278031	279163	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC750.08c	fft3	SPAC750.08c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.665554639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781192	2541531	2540256	278031	276787	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC32F12.12c	fft3	SPBC32F12.12c	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.385617005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781193	2541531	2542976	278031	279414	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC9E9.09c	fft3	atd1	snf2SR	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635918002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781194	2541531	2539217	278031	275787	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1223.03c	fft3	gut2	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095946952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781195	2541531	2539974	278031	276518	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC32H8.07	fft3	git5	snf2SR	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.629686184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781196	2541531	2542070	278031	278547	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC29B12.02c	fft3	set2	snf2SR	kmt3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.723109755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781197	2541531	2543236	278031	279664	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC8C9.04	fft3	SPAC8C9.04	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195352924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781198	2541531	2540836	278031	277354	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC18H10.19	fft3	vps38	snf2SR	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.910136553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781199	2541531	2540077	278031	276615	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC17D11.04c	fft3	nto1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.909218414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781200	2541531	2538841	278031	275422	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC550.03c	fft3	SPCC550.03c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.927745825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781201	2541531	2540232	278031	276764	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC336.10c	fft3	tif512	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093589383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781202	2541531	2539232	278031	275802	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1223.04c	fft3	set11	snf2SR	mug76	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.975846579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781203	2541531	2543378	278031	279800	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3H8.07c	fft3	pac10	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.905826979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781204	2541531	2538935	278031	275511	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1682.11c	fft3	ctl1	snf2SR	SPCC1682.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04398256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781205	2541531	2541900	278031	278390	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC23H4.17c	fft3	srb10	snf2SR	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.400217281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781206	2541531	2543311	278031	279735	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC977.15	fft3	SPAC977.15	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.965031054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781207	2541531	2539408	278031	275973	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC576.12c	fft3	mhf2	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.824065134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781208	2541531	2542519	278031	278977	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC19G12.08	fft3	scs7	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989292187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781209	2541531	2539481	278031	276044	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC622.16c	fft3	epe1	snf2SR	kdm2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.569525286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781210	2541531	2541009	278031	277524	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC428.04	fft3	apq12	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.654146813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781211	2541531	2539953	278031	276497	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1709.11c	fft3	png2	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.476672227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781212	2541531	2543080	278031	279513	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3A11.10c	fft3	SPAC3A11.10c	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.97603051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781213	2541531	2542056	278031	278535	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC6G9.14	fft3	SPAC6G9.14	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513741847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781214	2541531	2539715	278031	276268	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1778.09	fft3	SPBC1778.09	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.558719608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781215	2541531	2539119	278031	275691	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1223.13	fft3	cbf12	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.450185651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781216	2541531	2541954	278031	278441	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC23C4.05c	fft3	SPAC23C4.05c	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.396714032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781217	2541531	2538949	278031	275523	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC320.03	fft3	SPCC320.03	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.568142775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781218	2541531	2540990	278031	277506	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC36B7.06c	fft3	mug20	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699490472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781219	2541531	2543119	278031	279551	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3A11.07	fft3	nde2	snf2SR	SPAC3A11.07	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444037559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781220	2541531	2542720	278031	279171	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC25G10.05c	fft3	his1	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.265956919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781221	2541531	2542008	278031	278491	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC2G11.07c	fft3	ptc3	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.753208272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781222	2541531	2538708	278031	275292	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC594.01	fft3	SPCC594.01	snf2SR	SPCC736.16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709996618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781223	2541531	2541536	278031	278036	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1071.02	fft3	mms19	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.756642109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781224	2541531	2541708	278031	278203	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC31A2.02	fft3	trm112	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.276857128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781225	2541531	2541464	278031	277966	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC222.08c	fft3	SPAC222.08c	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.292757107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781226	2541531	2540342	278031	276871	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC2G2.01c	fft3	liz1	snf2SR	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.141976478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781227	2541531	2540180	278031	276713	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC16D10.11c	fft3	rps1801	snf2SR	rps18-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.568160751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781228	2541531	2540967	278031	277483	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC36B7.08c	fft3	SPBC36B7.08c	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.274460184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781229	2541531	2541410	278031	277918	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBPB2B2.17c	fft3	SPBPB2B2.17c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.130385203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781230	2541531	2541406	278031	277914	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBPB2B2.07c	fft3	SPBPB2B2.07c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.8206674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781231	2541531	2543517	278031	279935	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3G9.05	fft3	spa2	snf2SR	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447317852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781232	2541531	3361470	278031	280546	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3G9.01	fft3	nsk1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.577724339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781233	2541531	2541395	278031	277904	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP8B7.25	fft3	cyp4	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.078552979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781234	2541531	2539052	278031	275625	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC663.09c	fft3	SPCC663.09c	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.910825785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781235	2541531	2541266	278031	277780	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP16F5.05c	fft3	yar1	snf2SR	SPBP16F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.338280739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781236	2541531	2540844	278031	277361	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1921.04c	fft3	SPBC1921.04c	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388792587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781237	2541531	2540882	278031	277399	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC4F6.08c	fft3	mrpl39	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982047204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781238	2541531	2541614	278031	278111	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC29A4.20	fft3	elp3	snf2SR	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.899624823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781239	2541531	2538690	278031	275275	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1393.05	fft3	ers1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.935696659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781240	2541531	2539498	278031	276061	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC645.11c	fft3	mug117	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.209315871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781241	2541531	2542550	278031	279007	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1B3.02c	fft3	SPAC1B3.02c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.524747976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781242	2541531	2539421	278031	275986	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC794.11c	fft3	ent3	snf2SR	SPCC794.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.8741848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781243	2541531	2542255	278031	278725	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC57A7.08	fft3	pzh1	snf2SR	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.554985409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781244	2541531	2539812	278031	276362	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1347.02	fft3	fkbp39	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.361377697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781245	2541531	2540005	278031	276549	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1347.09	fft3	SPBC1347.09	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.413474376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781246	2541531	2541337	278031	277848	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP35G2.13c	fft3	swc2	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.031301814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781247	2541531	2541378	278031	277889	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP8B7.21	fft3	ubp3	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.074251671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781248	2541531	2543139	278031	279571	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC12G12.03	fft3	cip2	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.092217279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781249	2541531	2540930	278031	277446	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC354.10	fft3	def1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576577389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781250	2541531	2540691	278031	277216	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC20F10.05	fft3	nrl1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.833602709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781251	2541531	2542602	278031	279056	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC186.09	fft3	SPAC186.09	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.562658411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781252	2541531	2539964	278031	276508	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1773.03c	fft3	SPBC1773.03c	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.919308008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781253	2541531	2541017	278031	277532	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC36.07	fft3	elp1	snf2SR	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.755191301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781254	2541531	2540946	278031	277462	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC36.04	fft3	cys11	snf2SR	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.606143053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781255	2541531	2541144	278031	277659	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC685.06	fft3	rps001	snf2SR	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.337237422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781256	2541531	2540918	278031	277434	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC800.02	fft3	whi5	snf2SR	mug54	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.750337755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781257	2541531	2539538	278031	276100	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC364.06	fft3	nap1	snf2SR	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.16096917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781258	2541531	2539706	278031	276259	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC16G5.13	fft3	ptf2	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.476576193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781259	2541531	2540706	278031	277229	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC19C7.12c	fft3	omh1	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.609175439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781260	2541531	2539160	278031	275732	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC18.17c	fft3	SPCC18.17c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.966127253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781261	2541531	2541786	278031	278278	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC22F3.08c	fft3	rok1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.505940245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781262	2541531	2539453	278031	276016	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCPB1C11.03	fft3	SPCPB1C11.03	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876649742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781263	2541531	2543332	278031	279755	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAPB8E5.04c	fft3	SPAPB8E5.04c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986148844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781264	2541531	2539842	278031	276390	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC14C8.15	fft3	SPBC14C8.15	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701094747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781265	2541531	2540442	278031	276970	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC25B2.04c	fft3	mtg1	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.456711894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781266	2541531	2539354	278031	275920	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC4F11.03c	fft3	SPCC4F11.03c	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.088407449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781267	2541531	2539499	278031	276062	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC622.08c	fft3	hta1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.239441688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781268	2541531	2538762	278031	275345	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC306.04c	fft3	set1	snf2SR	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.60915651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781269	2541531	2542619	278031	279073	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC6G10.02c	fft3	tea3	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820964625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781270	2541531	2543628	278031	280042	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3H8.10	fft3	spo20	snf2SR	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.630232834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781271	2541531	2539101	278031	275673	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC736.04c	fft3	gma12	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773202168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781272	2541531	2543619	278031	280033	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC4F10.04	fft3	ypa1	snf2SR	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.061943137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781273	2541531	2539555	278031	276116	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC4B3.08	fft3	lsg1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.192261668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781274	2541531	2542327	278031	278793	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC16C9.06c	fft3	upf1	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.12317244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781275	2541531	2540242	278031	276774	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC32F12.07c	fft3	SPBC32F12.07c	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.078159458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781276	2541531	2542167	278031	278642	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC17C9.11c	fft3	SPAC17C9.11c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.132179913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781277	2541531	2542847	278031	279293	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1420.01c	fft3	SPAC1420.01c	snf2SR	SPAC56E4.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928058992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781278	2541531	2543106	278031	279538	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3A11.13	fft3	SPAC3A11.13	snf2SR	SPAC3H5.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714665062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781279	2541531	2539137	278031	275709	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1682.08c	fft3	mcp2	snf2SR	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.697391628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781280	2541531	2540498	278031	277026	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC27.02c	fft3	ask1	snf2SR	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.04279849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781281	2541531	2542883	278031	279328	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1486.04c	fft3	alm1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.635815036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781282	2541531	2539925	278031	276469	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC16H5.13	fft3	SPBC16H5.13	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.132739085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781283	2541531	2540648	278031	277173	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1921.05	fft3	ape2	snf2SR	ape1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505538854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781284	2541531	2540800	278031	277319	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC409.20c	fft3	psh3	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.047941947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781285	2541531	2540152	278031	276688	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC12C2.03c	fft3	SPBC12C2.03c	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851906321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781286	2541531	2540881	278031	277398	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC577.14c	fft3	spa1	snf2SR	spa	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.988014331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781287	2541531	2538717	278031	275301	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1235.02	fft3	bio2	snf2SR	SPCC320.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.557372537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781288	2541531	2542113	278031	278589	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1B3.11c	fft3	ypt4	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.825481755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781289	2541531	2538966	278031	275540	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC18.10	fft3	SPCC18.10	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.402875631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781290	2541531	2540998	278031	277514	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC3D6.05	fft3	ptp4	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.021579073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781291	2541531	2539246	278031	275816	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC18.13	fft3	SPCC18.13	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.30198129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781292	2541531	2543136	278031	279568	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1348.07	fft3	SPBC1348.07	snf2SR	SPAC1348.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193323645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781293	2541531	2540464	278031	276992	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC23E6.02	fft3	rrp2	snf2SR	SPBC23E6.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.230477511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781294	2541531	2541372	278031	277883	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP8B7.28c	fft3	stc1	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.410774087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781295	2541531	2541279	278031	277792	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC8E4.03	fft3	SPBC8E4.03	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.751727336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781296	2541531	2539614	278031	276172	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC17D11.08	fft3	SPBC17D11.08	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.208168704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781297	2541531	2538714	278031	275298	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC330.11	fft3	btb1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.064352173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781298	2541531	2540935	278031	277451	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC359.04c	fft3	pfl7	snf2SR	SPBC359.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.974346113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781299	2541531	2542472	278031	278933	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC9E9.13	fft3	wos2	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869357611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781300	2541531	2539707	278031	276260	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC17F3.01c	fft3	rga5	snf2SR	SPBC557.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.337623263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781301	2541531	2540725	278031	277248	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC215.14c	fft3	vps20	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.269762167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781302	2541531	2541367	278031	277878	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP8B7.13	fft3	vac7	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637493227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781303	2541531	2539471	278031	276034	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC576.14	fft3	dph5	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.104650712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781304	2541531	2539816	278031	276366	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC12C2.04	fft3	SPBC12C2.04	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.872456992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781305	2541531	2540346	278031	276875	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC2F12.03c	fft3	ebs1	snf2SR	SPBC2F12.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.935812258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781306	2541531	2541114	278031	277629	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC582.09	fft3	pex11	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381664379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781307	2541531	2540699	278031	277223	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC800.08	fft3	gcd10	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.180441277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781308	2541531	2541797	278031	278288	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC22F3.04	fft3	mug62	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.557066625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781309	2541531	2541860	278031	278350	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC22F3.02	fft3	atf31	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.845842946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781310	2541531	2542326	278031	278792	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC16C9.07	fft3	pom2	snf2SR	SPAC2G11.01|mug189|ppk5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.751561665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781311	2541531	2541036	278031	277551	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC3H7.05c	fft3	SPBC3H7.05c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.775090063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781312	2541531	2539514	278031	276076	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC663.14c	fft3	trp663	snf2SR	SPCC663.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.90152024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781313	2541531	2543091	278031	279524	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC12G12.15	fft3	sif3	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.772025528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781314	2541531	2539772	278031	276323	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1734.05c	fft3	spf31	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.845485754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781315	2541531	2540211	278031	276744	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC947.15c	fft3	nde1	snf2SR	SPBC947.15c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.665391203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781316	2541531	2542222	278031	278695	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC31G5.18c	fft3	sde2	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.854565246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781317	2541531	2542727	278031	279177	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC26A3.02	fft3	myh1	snf2SR	myh	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.274851525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781318	2541531	2543649	278031	280063	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3H5.11	fft3	SPAC3H5.11	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.332660125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781319	2541531	2542826	278031	279273	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC13G6.09	fft3	SPAC13G6.09	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.349851703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781320	2541531	2539668	278031	276223	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC11B10.10c	fft3	pht1	snf2SR	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.009052458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781321	2541531	2543602	278031	280017	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAPB1A11.04c	fft3	mca1	snf2SR	SPAPB1A11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.32463365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781322	2541531	2542635	278031	279089	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC24H6.09	fft3	gef1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.090042672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781323	2541531	2542628	278031	279082	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC24H6.06	fft3	sld3	snf2SR	mug175	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.721050874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781324	2541531	2540064	278031	276602	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1718.02	fft3	hop1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517145648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781325	2541531	2542574	278031	279030	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC186.05c	fft3	SPAC186.05c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.286699769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781326	2541531	2542303	278031	278770	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1687.21	fft3	SPAC1687.21	snf2SR	SPAC222.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039676074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781327	2541531	2543672	278031	280086	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC4H3.01	fft3	SPAC4H3.01	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.563122507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781328	2541531	2540555	278031	277082	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP16F5.02	fft3	mcs2	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.909877576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781329	2541531	2539207	278031	275777	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC285.09c	fft3	cgs2	snf2SR	pde1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.566764389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781330	2541531	2541757	278031	278251	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC2F7.10	fft3	akr1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256133736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781331	2541531	2539702	278031	276255	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1604.12	fft3	SPBC1604.12	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.535999053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781332	2541531	2539736	278031	276288	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC12C2.12c	fft3	glo1	snf2SR	SPBC21D10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639463094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781333	2541531	2539205	278031	275775	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC4B3.15	fft3	mid1	snf2SR	dmf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.337119214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781334	2541531	3361117	278031	280193	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC663.17	fft3	wtf15	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.065056879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781335	2541531	2540563	278031	277090	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC25H2.09	fft3	SPBC25H2.09	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783526892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781336	2541531	2542904	278031	279348	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC144.11	fft3	rps1102	snf2SR	rps11|rps11-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.544483841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781337	2541531	2540380	278031	276909	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1A4.05	fft3	blt1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769275817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781338	2541531	2543124	278031	279556	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3A11.06	fft3	mvp1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.196828405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781339	2541531	2540140	278031	276677	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC16C6.08c	fft3	qcr6	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.683797604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781340	2541531	2540896	278031	277412	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC19C2.13c	fft3	ctu2	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.881438653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781341	2541531	2539375	278031	275941	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC4G3.11	fft3	mug154	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.869913334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781342	2541531	2539189	278031	275760	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1682.16	fft3	rpt4	snf2SR	SPCC306.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040266275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781343	2541531	2539178	278031	275749	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1682.14	fft3	rpl1902	snf2SR	rpl19-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.459768864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781344	2541531	2542244	278031	278714	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC19G12.13c	fft3	poz1	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.059090285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781345	2541531	2542411	278031	278875	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC19B12.07c	fft3	SPAC19B12.07c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094851919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781346	2541531	2542059	278031	278537	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC328.06	fft3	ubp2	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.340272241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781347	2541531	2542119	278031	278595	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1834.08	fft3	mak1	snf2SR	phk3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.660353702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781348	2541531	2541946	278031	278433	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC2G11.04	fft3	SPAC2G11.04	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.252674526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781349	2541531	3361410	278031	280486	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1527.01	fft3	mok11	snf2SR	SPAC23D3.15	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.902016592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781350	2541531	2538861	278031	275441	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1620.11	fft3	nup97	snf2SR	mug87	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.62395191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781351	2541531	2541151	278031	277666	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC713.03	fft3	SPBC713.03	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.818447829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781352	2541531	2541238	278031	277752	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC8E4.05c	fft3	SPBC8E4.05c	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508202003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781353	2541531	2542630	278031	279084	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC2C4.06c	fft3	SPAC2C4.06c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.335389212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781354	2541531	2540683	278031	277208	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC19G7.04	fft3	SPBC19G7.04	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.669688296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781355	2541531	2543513	278031	279931	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC821.06	fft3	spn2	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.088426279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781356	2541531	2539700	278031	276253	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1685.15c	fft3	klp6	snf2SR	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.833648184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781357	2541531	2543400	278031	279822	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3G9.11c	fft3	SPAC3G9.11c	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.337837461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781358	2541531	3361552	278031	280628	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC2E12.05	fft3	wtf1	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154832738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781359	2541531	2541774	278031	278268	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC22E12.05c	fft3	rer1	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.791701117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781360	2541531	2539875	278031	276421	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC16A3.12c	fft3	SPBC16A3.12c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.868608774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781361	2541531	2540409	278031	276937	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC2D10.11c	fft3	nap2	snf2SR	nap1.2|nap12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.707137936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781362	2541531	2543387	278031	279809	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAPB1E7.02c	fft3	mcl1	snf2SR	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.613766623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781363	2541531	2543327	278031	279750	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1D4.06c	fft3	csk1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.946658617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781364	2541531	2540766	278031	277286	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC19C2.02	fft3	pmt1	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.337939249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781365	2541531	2538854	278031	275435	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCP1E11.05c	fft3	are2	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.048870985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781366	2541531	2542886	278031	279331	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1486.01	fft3	SPAC1486.01	snf2SR	sod2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.31528848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781367	2541531	2540451	278031	276979	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC2G2.17c	fft3	SPBC2G2.17c	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.394107859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781368	2541531	2539531	278031	276093	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC576.02	fft3	SPCC576.02	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982443062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781369	2541531	2539128	278031	275700	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1682.06	fft3	SPCC1682.06	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.320342911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781370	2541531	2540828	278031	277346	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC4B4.06	fft3	vps25	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.475228011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781371	2541531	2543070	278031	279503	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC2H10.02c	fft3	SPAC2H10.02c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.409827906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781372	2541531	2541869	278031	278359	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC22F3.13	fft3	tsc1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.678876615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781373	2541531	2541867	278031	278357	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC22E12.14c	fft3	sck2	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.814819878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781374	2541531	2539588	278031	276146	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC962.04	fft3	rps1201	snf2SR	rps12|rps12-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.61078924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781375	2541531	2541646	278031	278142	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC750.06c	fft3	SPAC750.06c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.103582798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781376	2541531	2541478	278031	277980	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC2F7.17	fft3	mrf1	snf2SR	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093244337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781377	2541531	2541808	278031	278299	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC22A12.14c	fft3	SPAC22A12.14c	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.194194005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781378	2541531	2540167	278031	276702	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1683.04	fft3	SPBC1683.04	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444204864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781379	2541531	2543333	278031	279756	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC694.02	fft3	SPAC694.02	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817516971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781380	2541531	2538947	278031	275521	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1682.12c	fft3	ubp16	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.90710508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781381	2541531	2541320	278031	277832	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1271.03c	fft3	SPBC1271.03c	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.278548535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781382	2541531	2543090	278031	279523	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1348.01	fft3	SPBC1348.01	snf2SR	SPAC1348.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.667120128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781383	2541531	2540383	278031	276912	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC31E1.02c	fft3	pmr1	snf2SR	cps5|pgak2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.820087344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781384	2541531	2542440	278031	278902	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC17A2.12	fft3	rrp1	snf2SR	SPAC17A2.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.345874123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781385	2541531	2543100	278031	279532	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC12B10.14c	fft3	tea5	snf2SR	ppk2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.800011869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781386	2541531	2541272	278031	277786	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC947.03c	fft3	naa38	snf2SR	mak31	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.33622542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781387	2541531	2542094	278031	278571	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC29B12.06c	fft3	rcd1	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153311729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781388	2541531	2543646	278031	280060	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC821.07c	fft3	moc3	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.181198668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781389	2541531	2540208	278031	276741	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC9B6.03	fft3	SPBC9B6.03	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.192853509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781390	2541531	2540310	278031	276840	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC29B5.04c	fft3	SPBC29B5.04c	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.623998795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781391	2541531	2541297	278031	277809	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC9B6.07	fft3	nop52	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.494488567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781392	2541531	2541236	278031	277750	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC887.11	fft3	pus2	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506671554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781393	2541531	2539738	278031	276290	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC17G9.09	fft3	tif213	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811076987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781394	2541531	2540320	278031	276850	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC3D6.04c	fft3	mad1	snf2SR	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.538920702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781395	2541531	2541875	278031	278365	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC22F3.06c	fft3	lon1	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987381302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781396	2541531	2540787	278031	277306	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1921.07c	fft3	sgf29	snf2SR	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.387873734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781397	2541531	2540798	278031	277317	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC19C7.01	fft3	mni1	snf2SR	SPBC32F12.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.777680361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781398	2541531	2539494	278031	276057	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC4G3.08	fft3	psk1	snf2SR	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816871705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781399	2541531	2541260	278031	277774	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC902.05c	fft3	idh2	snf2SR	glu2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.938938434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781400	2541531	2542571	278031	279027	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC589.02c	fft3	med13	snf2SR	spTrap240|srb9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047707478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781401	2540853	2542177	277370	278652	SPBC428.16c	SPAC17H9.08	rhb1	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865434569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781402	2540853	2541096	277370	277611	SPBC428.16c	SPBC725.10	rhb1	SPBC725.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875692505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781403	2540853	2540326	277370	276856	SPBC428.16c	SPBC2G5.06c	rhb1	hmt2	-	cad1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807432016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781404	2540853	2541464	277370	277966	SPBC428.16c	SPAC222.08c	rhb1	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868757829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781405	2540853	2542597	277370	279051	SPBC428.16c	SPAP8A3.07c	rhb1	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.274693193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781406	2540853	2543411	277370	279833	SPBC428.16c	SPAPB1A10.10c	rhb1	ypt71	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091162532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781407	2540853	2542561	277370	279017	SPBC428.16c	SPAC31G5.17c	rhb1	rps1001	-	rps10-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.146947913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781408	2541517	2542598	278018	279052	SPAC22A12.03c	SPAC6G10.08	csn4	idp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.620954795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781409	2541517	2541512	278018	278013	SPAC22A12.03c	SPAC11E3.08c	csn4	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.398011502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781410	2541517	2540964	278018	277480	SPAC22A12.03c	SPBC365.16	csn4	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.830987758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781411	2541517	2538994	278018	275568	SPAC22A12.03c	SPCC553.01c	csn4	dbl2	-	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.382106565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781412	2541517	2543633	278018	280047	SPAC22A12.03c	SPAC3H8.05c	csn4	mms1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.941883434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781413	2541517	2543387	278018	279809	SPAC22A12.03c	SPAPB1E7.02c	csn4	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.343659305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781414	2541517	2543472	278018	279892	SPAC22A12.03c	SPAC959.04c	csn4	omh6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813276864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781415	2541834	2539930	278325	276474	SPAC824.08	SPBC1198.11c	gda1	reb1	gdp1	SPBC660.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.461279875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781416	2541834	2541438	278325	277943	SPAC824.08	SPAC23G3.10c	gda1	ssr3	gdp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811333044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781417	2541834	2540455	278325	276983	SPAC824.08	SPBC215.05	gda1	gpd1	gdp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713820361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781418	2541834	2540664	278325	277189	SPAC824.08	SPBC215.02	gda1	bob1	gdp1	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.800725611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781419	2541834	2542543	278325	279000	SPAC824.08	SPAC30D11.11	gda1	SPAC30D11.11	gdp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329961081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781420	2541834	2540086	278325	276624	SPAC824.08	SPBC16H5.12c	gda1	SPBC16H5.12c	gdp1	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505440588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781421	2541834	2540326	278325	276856	SPAC824.08	SPBC2G5.06c	gda1	hmt2	gdp1	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.314427822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781422	2541834	2540327	278325	276857	SPAC824.08	SPBC31F10.07	gda1	lsb5	gdp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.839367148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781423	2541834	2541142	278325	277657	SPAC824.08	SPBC725.04	gda1	SPBC725.04	gdp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.449325044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781424	2541834	2539213	278325	275783	SPAC824.08	SPCC285.10c	gda1	SPCC285.10c	gdp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44818361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781425	2541834	2542541	278325	278998	SPAC824.08	SPAC1B3.03c	gda1	wis2	gdp1	cyp5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322223815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781426	2541834	2540115	278325	276652	SPAC824.08	SPBC1778.02	gda1	rap1	gdp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.749714138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781427	2541834	2541806	278325	278297	SPAC824.08	SPAC4G8.13c	gda1	prz1	gdp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.598841502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781428	2542891	2542895	279335	279339	SPAC6F12.12	SPAC13G6.10c	par2	asl1	pbp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817570454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781429	2542891	2538993	279335	275567	SPAC6F12.12	SPCC162.12	par2	tco89	pbp2	SPCC1753.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874514039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781430	2542891	2541345	279335	277856	SPAC6F12.12	SPBP35G2.07	par2	ilv1	pbp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455611015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781431	2542891	2540139	279335	276676	SPAC6F12.12	SPBC1773.06c	par2	adh8	pbp2	SPBC1773.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98950234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781432	2542891	2543652	279335	280066	SPAC6F12.12	SPAC4H3.03c	par2	SPAC4H3.03c	pbp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.337360541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781433	2542891	2543434	279335	279854	SPAC6F12.12	SPAC8F11.02c	par2	dph3	pbp2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.243685491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781434	2542891	2543320	279335	279744	SPAC6F12.12	SPAPJ695.01c	par2	SPAPJ695.01c	pbp2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.626842835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781435	2542891	2541086	279335	277601	SPAC6F12.12	SPBC685.04c	par2	aps2	pbp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871223474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781436	2542891	2540975	279335	277491	SPAC6F12.12	SPBC354.12	par2	gpd3	pbp2	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.261187172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781437	2542891	2542107	279335	278583	SPAC6F12.12	SPAC30.01c	par2	sec72	pbp2	sec7b|sec702	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091005602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781438	2542891	2541205	279335	277719	SPAC6F12.12	SPBC839.02	par2	SPBC839.02	pbp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096846406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781439	2542891	2539606	279335	276164	SPAC6F12.12	SPBC15D4.05	par2	SPBC15D4.05	pbp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.273037283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781440	2542891	2541964	279335	278450	SPAC6F12.12	SPAC2F3.08	par2	sut1	pbp2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978549532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781441	2542891	2540344	279335	276873	SPAC6F12.12	SPBC30D10.03c	par2	SPBC30D10.03c	pbp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932983738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781442	2542891	2542146	279335	278622	SPAC6F12.12	SPAC1B3.10c	par2	SPAC1B3.10c	pbp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866610327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781443	2542891	2543573	279335	279988	SPAC6F12.12	SPAC869.11	par2	cat1	pbp2	SPAC922.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638561395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781444	2542891	2539388	279335	275953	SPAC6F12.12	SPCC24B10.12	par2	cgi121	pbp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143053173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781445	2542891	2541288	279335	277801	SPAC6F12.12	SPBP35G2.04c	par2	SPBP35G2.04c	pbp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096509625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781446	2542891	2538770	279335	275353	SPAC6F12.12	SPCC1753.02c	par2	git3	pbp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.160502691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781447	2542891	2541889	279335	278379	SPAC6F12.12	SPAC2F7.03c	par2	pom1	pbp2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.750534489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781448	2542891	2542454	279335	278915	SPAC6F12.12	SPAC1399.01c	par2	SPAC1399.01c	pbp2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.442461804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781449	2542891	2543643	279335	280057	SPAC6F12.12	SPAC3G9.07c	par2	hos2	pbp2	hda1|phd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.838370872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781450	2542891	2540628	279335	277154	SPAC6F12.12	SPBC25B2.08	par2	SPBC25B2.08	pbp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.415506017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781451	2542891	2538945	279335	275519	SPAC6F12.12	SPCC1739.06c	par2	SPCC1739.06c	pbp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.102596246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781452	2542891	2540290	279335	276821	SPAC6F12.12	SPBC29A3.02c	par2	his7	pbp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872060664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781453	2542891	2540077	279335	276615	SPAC6F12.12	SPBC17D11.04c	par2	nto1	pbp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090641821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781454	2542891	2542867	279335	279312	SPAC6F12.12	SPAC343.16	par2	lys2	pbp2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.840610367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781455	2542891	2540374	279335	276903	SPAC6F12.12	SPBC31F10.02	par2	SPBC31F10.02	pbp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.273384124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781456	2542891	2542437	279335	278899	SPAC6F12.12	SPAC17A5.01	par2	pex6	pbp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.335422913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781457	2542891	3361134	279335	280210	SPAC6F12.12	SPCC737.09c	par2	hmt1	pbp2	SPCC74.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.034030463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781458	2542891	2539030	279335	275603	SPAC6F12.12	SPCP1E11.02	par2	ppk38	pbp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094761801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781459	2542891	2540800	279335	277319	SPAC6F12.12	SPBC409.20c	par2	psh3	pbp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.917770065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781460	2542891	2541372	279335	277883	SPAC6F12.12	SPBP8B7.28c	par2	stc1	pbp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.182596788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781461	2542891	2538756	279335	275339	SPAC6F12.12	SPCC1795.10c	par2	SPCC1795.10c	pbp2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.399223937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781462	2542891	2540891	279335	277407	SPAC6F12.12	SPBC582.08	par2	SPBC582.08	pbp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866630882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781463	2542891	3361329	279335	280405	SPAC6F12.12	SPBC25H2.10c	par2	SPBC25H2.10c	pbp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.877223077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781464	2542891	2539772	279335	276323	SPAC6F12.12	SPBC1734.05c	par2	spf31	pbp2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378380608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781465	2542891	2539182	279335	275753	SPAC6F12.12	SPCC16A11.16c	par2	rpn1302	pbp2	rpn13|rpn13b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865137588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781466	2542891	2539207	279335	275777	SPAC6F12.12	SPCC285.09c	par2	cgs2	pbp2	pde1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.267414819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781467	2542891	2539928	279335	276472	SPAC6F12.12	SPBC1604.08c	par2	imp1	pbp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.942780615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781468	2542891	3361511	279335	280587	SPAC6F12.12	SPAC23C4.08	par2	rho3	pbp2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575988777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781469	2542891	2540125	279335	276662	SPAC6F12.12	SPBC16C6.01c	par2	SPBC16C6.01c	pbp2	SPBC543.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330935453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781470	2542891	2540167	279335	276702	SPAC6F12.12	SPBC1683.04	par2	SPBC1683.04	pbp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819211042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781471	2542891	2540309	279335	276839	SPAC6F12.12	SPBC21B10.13c	par2	yox1	pbp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.978800511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781472	2542891	2542314	279335	278780	SPAC6F12.12	SPAC16E8.06c	par2	nop12	pbp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037109674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781473	2542891	2539494	279335	276057	SPAC6F12.12	SPCC4G3.08	par2	psk1	pbp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090285928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781474	2541639	2540150	278135	276687	SPAC6F12.16c	SPBC16E9.14c	mtr4	zrg17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.671259827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781475	2541639	2542971	278135	279410	SPAC6F12.16c	SPAC105.02c	mtr4	SPAC105.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.849042397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781476	2541639	2543387	278135	279809	SPAC6F12.16c	SPAPB1E7.02c	mtr4	mcl1	-	slr3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.282271069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781477	2540992	2542207	277508	278682	SPBC342.05	SPAC17H9.10c	crb2	ddb1	rhp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.946438672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781478	2540992	2538847	277508	275428	SPBC342.05	SPCC594.06c	crb2	SPCC594.06c	rhp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.270084928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781479	2540992	2543685	277508	280099	SPBC342.05	SPAC3C7.03c	crb2	rad55	rhp9	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.18120536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781480	2540992	2538927	277508	275503	SPBC342.05	SPCC1795.09	crb2	yps1	rhp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.381537395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781481	2540992	2541489	277508	277991	SPBC342.05	SPAC23D3.11	crb2	ayr1	rhp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812272066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781482	2540992	2542036	277508	278518	SPBC342.05	SPAC23A1.19c	crb2	hrq1	rhp9	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.37003796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781483	2540992	2542695	277508	279148	SPBC342.05	SPAC12B10.09	crb2	pet801	rhp9	SPAC12B10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868204204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781484	2540992	2541649	277508	278145	SPBC342.05	SPAC1F3.06c	crb2	spo15	rhp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811546516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781485	2540992	2542499	277508	278958	SPBC342.05	SPAC1F12.04c	crb2	SPAC1F12.04c	rhp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.335290917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781486	2540992	2540348	277508	276877	SPBC342.05	SPBC29A10.05	crb2	exo1	rhp9	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.779399921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781487	2540992	2540338	277508	276867	SPBC342.05	SPBC2G2.13c	crb2	dcd1	rhp9	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.324147045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781488	2540992	2541911	277508	278401	SPBC342.05	SPAC212.04c	crb2	SPAC212.04c	rhp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.804081142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781489	2540992	2540086	277508	276624	SPBC342.05	SPBC16H5.12c	crb2	SPBC16H5.12c	rhp9	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.568355794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781490	2540992	2539000	277508	275574	SPBC342.05	SPCC1450.06c	crb2	grx3	rhp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320606513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781491	2540992	2542014	277508	278497	SPBC342.05	SPAC20H4.04	crb2	fml2	rhp9	mfh2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.356158867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781492	2540992	2542007	277508	278490	SPBC342.05	SPAC20H4.07	crb2	rad57	rhp9	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.455474582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781493	2540992	2542710	277508	279163	SPBC342.05	SPAC750.08c	crb2	SPAC750.08c	rhp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.165026505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781494	2540992	2542933	277508	279374	SPBC342.05	SPAPYUG7.06	crb2	sdu1	rhp9	mug67|hag1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.850874184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781495	2540992	2540836	277508	277354	SPBC342.05	SPBC18H10.19	crb2	vps38	rhp9	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.986086693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781496	2540992	2541900	277508	278390	SPBC342.05	SPAC23H4.17c	crb2	srb10	rhp9	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.292626416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781497	2540992	2541142	277508	277657	SPBC342.05	SPBC725.04	crb2	SPBC725.04	rhp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922206134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781498	2540992	2538828	277508	275409	SPBC342.05	SPCC1020.05	crb2	SPCC1020.05	rhp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.39820522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781499	2540992	2541488	277508	277990	SPBC342.05	SPAC227.17c	crb2	SPAC227.17c	rhp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.973265278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781500	2540992	2542602	277508	279056	SPBC342.05	SPAC186.09	crb2	SPAC186.09	rhp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.325828328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781501	2540992	2539555	277508	276116	SPBC342.05	SPCC4B3.08	crb2	lsg1	rhp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508658846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781502	2540992	2541909	277508	278399	SPBC342.05	SPAC227.01c	crb2	erd1	rhp9	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.663718813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781503	2540992	2540498	277508	277026	SPBC342.05	SPBC27.02c	crb2	ask1	rhp9	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.898104527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781504	2540992	2543304	277508	279728	SPBC342.05	SPAC6B12.12	crb2	tom70	rhp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.542855136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781505	2540992	2540998	277508	277514	SPBC342.05	SPBC3D6.05	crb2	ptp4	rhp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326566217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781506	2540992	2542940	277508	279381	SPBC342.05	SPAC31A2.12	crb2	SPAC31A2.12	rhp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.628059344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781507	2540992	2540829	277508	277347	SPBC342.05	SPBC800.09	crb2	sum2	rhp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.936558028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781508	2540992	2541036	277508	277551	SPBC342.05	SPBC3H7.05c	crb2	SPBC3H7.05c	rhp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987088895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781509	2540992	2542262	277508	278731	SPBC342.05	SPAC17C9.10	crb2	stm1	rhp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87218513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781510	2540992	2541657	277508	278153	SPBC342.05	SPAP27G11.15	crb2	slx1	rhp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929432339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781511	2540992	2542716	277508	279169	SPBC342.05	SPAC25H1.07	crb2	emc1	rhp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439681259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781512	2540992	2541806	277508	278297	SPBC342.05	SPAC4G8.13c	crb2	prz1	rhp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.944538223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781513	2540992	2543070	277508	279503	SPBC342.05	SPAC2H10.02c	crb2	SPAC2H10.02c	rhp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037315716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781514	2540992	2540481	277508	277009	SPBC342.05	SPBC2D10.12	crb2	rhp23	rhp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.048162057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781515	2540992	2542943	277508	279384	SPBC342.05	SPBC1348.03	crb2	SPBC1348.03	rhp9	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567510542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781516	2540992	2540649	277508	277174	SPBC342.05	SPBC19F8.08	crb2	rps401	rhp9	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379377173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781517	2539134	2538939	275706	275514	SPCC1450.09c	SPCC1672.04c	SPCC1450.09c	SPCC1672.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.00720305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781518	2539134	2539210	275706	275780	SPCC1450.09c	SPCC2H8.05c	SPCC1450.09c	dbl1	-	SPCC2H8.05c|SPCC63.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446103723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781519	2539134	2539579	275706	276138	SPCC1450.09c	SPCP31B10.05	SPCC1450.09c	tdp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510191603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781520	2539134	2540830	275706	277348	SPCC1450.09c	SPBC18H10.16	SPCC1450.09c	can1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.937453668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781521	2539134	2541663	275706	278159	SPCC1450.09c	SPAC22G7.08	SPCC1450.09c	ppk8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818638331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781522	2539134	2541741	275706	278235	SPCC1450.09c	SPAC20G4.02c	SPCC1450.09c	fus1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380724575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781523	2539134	2540797	275706	277316	SPCC1450.09c	SPBC18H10.11c	SPCC1450.09c	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.297673342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781524	2539134	2543375	275706	279797	SPCC1450.09c	SPAC3H1.08c	SPCC1450.09c	SPAC3H1.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713774714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781525	2539134	2539898	275706	276444	SPCC1450.09c	SPBC12D12.07c	SPCC1450.09c	trx2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513197406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781526	2539134	2540886	275706	277403	SPCC1450.09c	SPBC4F6.10	SPCC1450.09c	vps901	-	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.623856903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781527	2539134	2539281	275706	275849	SPCC1450.09c	SPCC132.03	SPCC1450.09c	SPCC132.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.400574308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781528	2539134	2540086	275706	276624	SPCC1450.09c	SPBC16H5.12c	SPCC1450.09c	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324678492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781529	2539134	2540665	275706	277190	SPCC1450.09c	SPBC83.02c	SPCC1450.09c	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.218327796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781530	2539134	2540836	275706	277354	SPCC1450.09c	SPBC18H10.19	SPCC1450.09c	vps38	-	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703571282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781531	2539134	2538723	275706	275307	SPCC1450.09c	SPCC31H12.06	SPCC1450.09c	mug111	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.135748998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781532	2539134	2541142	275706	277657	SPCC1450.09c	SPBC725.04	SPCC1450.09c	SPBC725.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935715258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781533	2539134	2541266	275706	277780	SPCC1450.09c	SPBP16F5.05c	SPCC1450.09c	yar1	-	SPBP16F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.3249777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781534	2539134	2542060	275706	278538	SPCC1450.09c	SPAC23C11.14	SPCC1450.09c	zhf1	-	zhf	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.466197855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781535	2539134	2539812	275706	276362	SPCC1450.09c	SPBC1347.02	SPCC1450.09c	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324056733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781536	2539134	2542781	275706	279230	SPCC1450.09c	SPAC57A10.12c	SPCC1450.09c	ura3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331486034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781537	2539134	2539519	275706	276081	SPCC1450.09c	SPCC364.05	SPCC1450.09c	vps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569252171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781538	2539134	2540946	275706	277462	SPCC1450.09c	SPBC36.04	SPCC1450.09c	cys11	-	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.036048091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781539	2539134	2540918	275706	277434	SPCC1450.09c	SPBC800.02	SPCC1450.09c	whi5	-	mug54	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.256483048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781540	2539134	2539245	275706	275815	SPCC1450.09c	SPCC1322.07c	SPCC1450.09c	mug150	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.124049574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781541	2539134	2541156	275706	277671	SPCC1450.09c	SPBC685.07c	SPCC1450.09c	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.690817684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781542	2539134	2543071	275706	279504	SPCC1450.09c	SPAC3C7.06c	SPCC1450.09c	pit1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.839519251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781543	2539134	2543304	275706	279728	SPCC1450.09c	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC1450.09c	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.985296564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781544	2539134	2543439	275706	279859	SPCC1450.09c	SPAPB1A10.13	SPCC1450.09c	SPAPB1A10.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.796600404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781545	2539134	2539253	275706	275823	SPCC1450.09c	SPCC1827.03c	SPCC1450.09c	SPCC1827.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875049797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781546	2539134	2541806	275706	278297	SPCC1450.09c	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC1450.09c	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.812516435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781547	2539134	2543587	275706	280002	SPCC1450.09c	SPAC4D7.02c	SPCC1450.09c	SPAC4D7.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323476107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781548	2539134	2540360	275706	276889	SPCC1450.09c	SPBC2G5.01	SPCC1450.09c	SPBC2G5.01	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820227582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781549	2543425	2542072	279845	278549	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAP32A8.03c	atg13	bop1	apg13|mug78	SPAP32A8.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444759363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781550	2543425	2542812	279845	279259	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAC6F6.01	atg13	cch1	apg13|mug78	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.406048266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781551	2543425	2541723	279845	278217	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAC22H12.01c	atg13	mug35	apg13|mug78	SPAC23G3.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913677979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781552	2543425	2542443	279845	278905	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAC17G6.13	atg13	slt1	apg13|mug78	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.048861583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781553	2543425	2542798	279845	279246	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAC13C5.06c	atg13	mug121	apg13|mug78	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.100010095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781554	2543425	2541117	279845	277632	SPAC4F10.07c	SPBC646.13	atg13	sds23	apg13|mug78	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.760054615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781555	2543425	2542758	279845	279208	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAC15E1.02c	atg13	SPAC15E1.02c	apg13|mug78	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871763091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781556	2543425	2539028	279845	275601	SPAC4F10.07c	SPCC1281.07c	atg13	SPCC1281.07c	apg13|mug78	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.85003231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781557	2543425	2542071	279845	278548	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAC26H5.03	atg13	pcf2	apg13|mug78	cac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38929284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781558	2543425	2540491	279845	277019	SPAC4F10.07c	SPBC28E12.04	atg13	SPBC28E12.04	apg13|mug78	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.982971559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781559	2543425	2540535	279845	277062	SPAC4F10.07c	SPBC215.01	atg13	SPBC215.01	apg13|mug78	SPBC3B9.20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.062582495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781560	2543425	2539332	279845	275898	SPAC4F10.07c	SPCPB1C11.01	atg13	amt1	apg13|mug78	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.61078924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781561	2543425	2541951	279845	278438	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAC222.05c	atg13	mss1	apg13|mug78	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503902931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781562	2543425	2541205	279845	277719	SPAC4F10.07c	SPBC839.02	atg13	SPBC839.02	apg13|mug78	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.987459855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781563	2543425	2542022	279845	278505	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAC23A1.03	atg13	apt1	apg13|mug78	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.560700989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781564	2543425	2540425	279845	276953	SPAC4F10.07c	SPBC27.06c	atg13	mgr2	apg13|mug78	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.755195726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781565	2543425	2542135	279845	278611	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAC13A11.04c	atg13	ubp8	apg13|mug78	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.31973085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781566	2543425	2543563	279845	279979	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAC664.02c	atg13	arp8	apg13|mug78	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.785070055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781567	2543425	2540714	279845	277237	SPAC4F10.07c	SPBC19C2.04c	atg13	ubp11	apg13|mug78	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.772129233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781568	2543425	2538845	279845	275426	SPAC4F10.07c	SPCC1235.13	atg13	ght6	apg13|mug78	meu12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041958454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781569	2543425	2542845	279845	279291	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAC824.04	atg13	SPAC824.04	apg13|mug78	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567833323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781570	2543425	2542033	279845	278515	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAC2C4.09	atg13	SPAC2C4.09	apg13|mug78	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640597629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781571	2543425	2541264	279845	277778	SPAC4F10.07c	SPBC902.06	atg13	mto2	apg13|mug78	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6353354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781572	2543425	2541160	279845	277675	SPAC4F10.07c	SPBC725.09c	atg13	hob3	apg13|mug78	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.084071955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781573	2543425	2541038	279845	277553	SPAC4F10.07c	SPBC29A10.01	atg13	ccr1	apg13|mug78	SPBC365.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932774524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781574	2543425	2539898	279845	276444	SPAC4F10.07c	SPBC12D12.07c	atg13	trx2	apg13|mug78	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.345410784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781575	2543425	2542193	279845	278668	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAC9G1.11c	atg13	spn4	apg13|mug78	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.882239639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781576	2543425	2543406	279845	279828	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAC9.12c	atg13	atp12	apg13|mug78	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.97865558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781577	2543425	2542631	279845	279085	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAC24H6.10c	atg13	SPAC24H6.10c	apg13|mug78	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985274178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781578	2543425	2538873	279845	275452	SPAC4F10.07c	SPCC306.11	atg13	SPCC306.11	apg13|mug78	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.621479718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781579	2543425	2541900	279845	278390	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAC23H4.17c	atg13	srb10	apg13|mug78	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321996204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781580	2543425	2541009	279845	277524	SPAC4F10.07c	SPBC428.04	atg13	apq12	apg13|mug78	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.402756685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781581	2543425	2539317	279845	275883	SPAC4F10.07c	SPCC16A11.08	atg13	atg20	apg13|mug78	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.276559551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781582	2543425	2542124	279845	278600	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAC19A8.14	atg13	SPAC19A8.14	apg13|mug78	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641368106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781583	2543425	2541939	279845	278426	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAC23C4.07	atg13	tht2	apg13|mug78	mug22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934434481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781584	2543425	2540599	279845	277125	SPAC4F10.07c	SPBC29A3.10c	atg13	atp14	apg13|mug78	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.256439573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781585	2543425	2538884	279845	275462	SPAC4F10.07c	SPCC1393.08	atg13	SPCC1393.08	apg13|mug78	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864327082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781586	2543425	2542781	279845	279230	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAC57A10.12c	atg13	ura3	apg13|mug78	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.990487004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781587	2543425	2541896	279845	278386	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAC23H4.16c	atg13	SPAC23H4.16c	apg13|mug78	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383233898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781588	2543425	2541017	279845	277532	SPAC4F10.07c	SPBC36.07	atg13	elp1	apg13|mug78	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868756687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781589	2543425	2541713	279845	278208	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAC3A12.12	atg13	atp11	apg13|mug78	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514780992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781590	2543425	2542767	279845	279217	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAC1565.07c	atg13	knd1	apg13|mug78	SPAC1565.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.486870856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781591	2543425	2540061	279845	276599	SPAC4F10.07c	SPBC119.12	atg13	rud3	apg13|mug78	SPBC119.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818134022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781592	2543425	2543670	279845	280084	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAPB1E7.06c	atg13	eme1	apg13|mug78	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.997715485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781593	2543425	2543136	279845	279568	SPAC4F10.07c	SPBC1348.07	atg13	SPBC1348.07	apg13|mug78	SPAC1348.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.881793211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781594	2543425	2540531	279845	277059	SPAC4F10.07c	SPBC23E6.08	atg13	sat1	apg13|mug78	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582571937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781595	2543425	2543662	279845	280076	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAC9.07c	atg13	SPAC9.07c	apg13|mug78	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.562084445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781596	2543425	2543329	279845	279752	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAC56F8.02	atg13	SPAC56F8.02	apg13|mug78	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092177327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781597	2543425	2538916	279845	275493	SPAC4F10.07c	SPCC16C4.17	atg13	mug123	apg13|mug78	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.413915858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781598	2543425	2542403	279845	278867	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAC19A8.05c	atg13	sst4	apg13|mug78	vps27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.359452792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781599	2543425	2539514	279845	276076	SPAC4F10.07c	SPCC663.14c	atg13	trp663	apg13|mug78	SPCC663.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.34119484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781600	2543425	2542685	279845	279138	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAC26A3.06	atg13	bud23	apg13|mug78	SPAC26A3.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.9356638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781601	2543425	2542826	279845	279273	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAC13G6.09	atg13	SPAC13G6.09	apg13|mug78	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.133438757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781602	2543425	2541790	279845	278282	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAC139.02c	atg13	oac1	apg13|mug78	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812782423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781603	2543425	2539726	279845	276278	SPAC4F10.07c	SPBC13E7.08c	atg13	leo1	apg13|mug78	SPBC13E7.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867409614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781604	2543425	2540278	279845	276809	SPAC4F10.07c	SPBC1A4.04	atg13	SPBC1A4.04	apg13|mug78	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870933463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781605	2543425	2539189	279845	275760	SPAC4F10.07c	SPCC1682.16	atg13	rpt4	apg13|mug78	SPCC306.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.102865771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781606	2543425	2539169	279845	275740	SPAC4F10.07c	SPCC1235.11	atg13	mpc1	apg13|mug78	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641153615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781607	2543425	2541357	279845	277868	SPAC4F10.07c	SPBPB7E8.01	atg13	SPBPB7E8.01	apg13|mug78	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.256658348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781608	2543425	2541806	279845	278297	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAC4G8.13c	atg13	prz1	apg13|mug78	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.228222157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781609	2543425	2543327	279845	279750	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAC1D4.06c	atg13	csk1	apg13|mug78	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.501214739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781610	2543425	2542175	279845	278650	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAC1F3.02c	atg13	mkh1	apg13|mug78	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322705571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781611	2543425	2540320	279845	276850	SPAC4F10.07c	SPBC3D6.04c	atg13	mad1	apg13|mug78	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579907558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781612	2543425	2543024	279845	279460	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAC1039.02	atg13	SPAC1039.02	apg13|mug78	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775931261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781613	2543109	2542207	279541	278682	SPAC3G6.09c	SPAC17H9.10c	tps2	ddb1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.080105761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781614	2543109	2543565	279541	279981	SPAC3G6.09c	SPAPB24D3.04c	tps2	mag1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.850074048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781615	2543109	2540999	279541	277515	SPAC3G6.09c	SPBC4B4.04	tps2	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.99326421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781616	2543109	2539576	279541	276136	SPAC3G6.09c	SPCC794.01c	tps2	zwf2	-	SPCC794.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813684436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781617	2543109	2543261	279541	279689	SPAC3G6.09c	SPAC1002.18	tps2	urg3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099875942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781618	2543109	2540825	279541	277343	SPAC3G6.09c	SPBC428.08c	tps2	clr4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042581294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781619	2543109	2543144	279541	279576	SPAC3G6.09c	SPAC3F10.05c	tps2	mug113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.71428979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781620	2543109	2542857	279541	279303	SPAC3G6.09c	SPAC144.06	tps2	apl5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.692809113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781621	2543109	2541296	279541	277808	SPAC3G6.09c	SPBP8B7.06	tps2	rpp201	-	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931875635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781622	2543109	2540498	279541	277026	SPAC3G6.09c	SPBC27.02c	tps2	ask1	-	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989871249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781623	2543109	2539925	279541	276469	SPAC3G6.09c	SPBC16H5.13	tps2	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201128553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781624	2543109	2543304	279541	279728	SPAC3G6.09c	SPAC6B12.12	tps2	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.123039841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781625	2543109	2542418	279541	278881	SPAC3G6.09c	SPAC1805.07c	tps2	dad2	-	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.997816374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781626	2543109	2538792	279541	275373	SPAC3G6.09c	SPCP1E11.10	tps2	SPCP1E11.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.540048609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781627	2541744	2540105	278238	276642	SPAC23A1.02c	SPBC106.04	SPAC23A1.02c	ada1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707032518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781628	2541744	2542293	278238	278761	SPAC23A1.02c	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC23A1.02c	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.286541711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781629	2541744	2540686	278238	277211	SPAC23A1.02c	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC23A1.02c	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.095966707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781630	2541744	2543681	278238	280095	SPAC23A1.02c	SPAC9.02c	SPAC23A1.02c	SPAC9.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452352626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781631	2541744	2541776	278238	278270	SPAC23A1.02c	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC23A1.02c	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781489433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781632	2541744	2542976	278238	279414	SPAC23A1.02c	SPAC9E9.09c	SPAC23A1.02c	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326188778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781633	2541744	2543517	278238	279935	SPAC23A1.02c	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC23A1.02c	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701904643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781634	2541744	2538828	278238	275409	SPAC23A1.02c	SPCC1020.05	SPAC23A1.02c	SPCC1020.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.72475081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781635	2541744	2540930	278238	277446	SPAC23A1.02c	SPBC354.10	SPAC23A1.02c	def1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048693168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781636	2541744	2541909	278238	278399	SPAC23A1.02c	SPAC227.01c	SPAC23A1.02c	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.050645559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781637	2541744	2542250	278238	278720	SPAC23A1.02c	SPAC17D4.03c	SPAC23A1.02c	cis4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.804806651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781638	2541744	2540936	278238	277452	SPAC23A1.02c	SPBC800.05c	SPAC23A1.02c	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.343894757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781639	2541744	2541806	278238	278297	SPAC23A1.02c	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC23A1.02c	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.050086959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781640	2541744	2542175	278238	278650	SPAC23A1.02c	SPAC1F3.02c	SPAC23A1.02c	mkh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.435210263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781641	2541744	2540383	278238	276912	SPAC23A1.02c	SPBC31E1.02c	SPAC23A1.02c	pmr1	-	cps5|pgak2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.315301147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781642	2543577	2541512	279992	278013	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC11E3.08c	srs2	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.133671988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781643	2543577	2542036	279992	278518	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC23A1.19c	srs2	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.613820244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781644	2543577	2538994	279992	275568	SPAC4H3.05	SPCC553.01c	srs2	dbl2	-	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.620231503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781645	2543577	2539527	279992	276089	SPAC4H3.05	SPCC338.16	srs2	pof3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.413768966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781646	2542359	2539147	278824	275719	SPAC1782.11	SPCC622.12c	met14	gdh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390221151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781647	2542359	2538961	278824	275535	SPAC1782.11	SPCC285.14	met14	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711140659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781648	2542359	2542689	278824	279142	SPAC1782.11	SPAC29B12.04	met14	snz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.146499563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781649	2542359	2539434	278824	275997	SPAC1782.11	SPCC757.09c	met14	rnc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81949566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781650	2542359	2539648	278824	276203	SPAC1782.11	SPBC1198.08	met14	SPBC1198.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.442130587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781651	2542359	2542082	278824	278559	SPAC1782.11	SPAC29B12.10c	met14	pgt1	-	opt1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.122473052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781652	2542359	2538927	278824	275503	SPAC1782.11	SPCC1795.09	met14	yps1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.630139501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781653	2542359	2542177	278824	278652	SPAC1782.11	SPAC17H9.08	met14	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200509658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781654	2542359	2540922	278824	277438	SPAC1782.11	SPBC36.10	met14	SPBC36.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.055945148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781655	2542359	2540673	278824	277198	SPAC1782.11	SPBC1D7.03	met14	mug80	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989263554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781656	2542359	2540831	278824	277349	SPAC1782.11	SPBC428.02c	met14	eca39	-	SPBC582.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.40317632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781657	2542359	2540086	278824	276624	SPAC1782.11	SPBC16H5.12c	met14	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.32778225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781658	2542359	2542549	278824	279006	SPAC1782.11	SPAC19A8.11c	met14	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.339049159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781659	2542359	2541464	278824	277966	SPAC1782.11	SPAC222.08c	met14	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045103253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781660	2542359	2540342	278824	276871	SPAC1782.11	SPBC2G2.01c	met14	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145297698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781661	2542359	2541053	278824	277568	SPAC1782.11	SPBC56F2.10c	met14	alg5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.705897266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781662	2542359	2542597	278824	279051	SPAC1782.11	SPAP8A3.07c	met14	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199273691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781663	2542359	2540882	278824	277399	SPAC1782.11	SPBC4F6.08c	met14	mrpl39	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811964366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781664	2542359	2542060	278824	278538	SPAC1782.11	SPAC23C11.14	met14	zhf1	-	zhf	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.874362096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781665	2542359	2541488	278824	277990	SPAC1782.11	SPAC227.17c	met14	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929136029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781666	2542359	3361520	278824	280596	SPAC1782.11	SPAC1610.02c	met14	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048590834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781667	2542359	2543304	278824	279728	SPAC1782.11	SPAC6B12.12	met14	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193665247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781668	2542359	2538717	278824	275301	SPAC1782.11	SPCC1235.02	met14	bio2	-	SPCC320.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.50352743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781669	2541293	2543529	277805	279947	SPBC9B6.10	SPAC4C5.02c	cdc37	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.193287047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781670	2541293	2541552	277805	278051	SPBC9B6.10	SPAC1142.08	cdc37	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.975534651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781671	2541293	2542273	277805	278742	SPBC9B6.10	SPAC17H9.13c	cdc37	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.463053166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781672	2541293	2541500	277805	278002	SPBC9B6.10	SPAC227.18	cdc37	lys3	-	SPAC2F7.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.087792331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781673	2541293	2542816	277805	279263	SPBC9B6.10	SPAC4G8.11c	cdc37	atp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.31554284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781674	2541293	2540692	277805	277217	SPBC9B6.10	SPBC800.07c	cdc37	tsf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.389815685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781675	2541293	2539792	277805	276342	SPBC9B6.10	SPBC1271.14	cdc37	SPBC1271.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.957075304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781676	2541293	2543593	277805	280008	SPBC9B6.10	SPAC4G9.10	cdc37	arg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.11937049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781677	2541293	2541889	277805	278379	SPBC9B6.10	SPAC2F7.03c	cdc37	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.728163657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781678	2541293	2541183	277805	277697	SPBC9B6.10	SPBC725.14	cdc37	arg6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.664232928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781679	2541293	2539815	277805	276365	SPBC9B6.10	SPBC1105.02c	cdc37	lys4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.53812282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781680	2541293	2542867	277805	279312	SPBC9B6.10	SPAC343.16	cdc37	lys2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.116252073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781681	2541293	2541708	277805	278203	SPBC9B6.10	SPAC31A2.02	cdc37	trm112	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.91093803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781682	2541293	2540180	277805	276713	SPBC9B6.10	SPBC16D10.11c	cdc37	rps1801	-	rps18-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.894208533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781683	2541293	2542597	277805	279051	SPBC9B6.10	SPAP8A3.07c	cdc37	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.122866345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781684	2541293	2543517	277805	279935	SPBC9B6.10	SPAC3G9.05	cdc37	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.857206231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781685	2541293	2541186	277805	277700	SPBC9B6.10	SPBC725.01	cdc37	SPBC725.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.339428317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781686	2541293	2538884	277805	275462	SPBC9B6.10	SPCC1393.08	cdc37	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.857592967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781687	2541293	3361520	277805	280596	SPBC9B6.10	SPAC1610.02c	cdc37	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.440886432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781688	2541293	2543391	277805	279813	SPBC9B6.10	SPAC4G9.09c	cdc37	arg11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.562272088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781689	2541293	2541175	277805	277689	SPBC9B6.10	SPBC839.13c	cdc37	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.479303013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781690	2541293	2543337	277805	279760	SPBC9B6.10	SPAC959.08	cdc37	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.201739856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781691	2541293	2539169	277805	275740	SPBC9B6.10	SPCC1235.11	cdc37	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.089248035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781692	2541293	2541806	277805	278297	SPBC9B6.10	SPAC4G8.13c	cdc37	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.937238207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781693	2541293	2541050	277805	277565	SPBC9B6.10	SPBC428.05c	cdc37	arg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.330854706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781694	2541293	2539001	277805	275575	SPBC9B6.10	SPCC1494.08c	cdc37	SPCC1494.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513377158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781695	2541293	2542609	277805	279063	SPBC9B6.10	SPAC31G5.04	cdc37	lys12	-	SPAC31G5.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.163924373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781696	2541133	2542895	277648	279339	SPBC660.05	SPAC13G6.10c	SPBC660.05	asl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781111607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781697	2541133	2543434	277648	279854	SPBC660.05	SPAC8F11.02c	SPBC660.05	dph3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.050075269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781698	2541133	2543680	277648	280094	SPBC660.05	SPAC4G9.20c	SPBC660.05	SPAC4G9.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.916783217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781699	2541133	2540491	277648	277019	SPBC660.05	SPBC28E12.04	SPBC660.05	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.988913186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781700	2541133	2542050	277648	278529	SPBC660.05	SPAC212.02	SPBC660.05	SPAC212.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.976520897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781701	2541133	2540979	277648	277495	SPBC660.05	SPBC3H7.10	SPBC660.05	elp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.914940295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781702	2541133	2541019	277648	277534	SPBC660.05	SPBC3B8.07c	SPBC660.05	dsd1	-	SDCB3B8.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641517109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781703	2541133	2539117	277648	275689	SPBC660.05	SPCC74.06	SPBC660.05	mak3	-	phk2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.377253599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781704	2541133	2540295	277648	276826	SPBC660.05	SPBC3B8.05	SPBC660.05	SPBC3B8.05	-	dph1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449099975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781705	2541133	2542180	277648	278655	SPBC660.05	SPAC589.07c	SPBC660.05	atg1801	-	atg18|atg18a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581009864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781706	2541133	2539100	277648	275672	SPBC660.05	SPCC330.12c	SPBC660.05	sdh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.27864334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781707	2541133	2543573	277648	279988	SPBC660.05	SPAC869.11	SPBC660.05	cat1	-	SPAC922.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.140937272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781708	2541133	2540797	277648	277316	SPBC660.05	SPBC18H10.11c	SPBC660.05	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.540089532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781709	2541133	2538751	277648	275334	SPBC660.05	SPCC1442.07c	SPBC660.05	SPCC1442.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714483975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781710	2541133	2539628	277648	276185	SPBC660.05	SPBC1604.03c	SPBC660.05	SPBC1604.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.83378236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781711	2541133	2542507	277648	278965	SPBC660.05	SPAC18G6.13	SPBC660.05	SPAC18G6.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.497257863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781712	2541133	2539754	277648	276306	SPBC660.05	SPBC16C6.04	SPBC660.05	dbl6	-	SPBC16C6.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510007457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781713	2541133	2543638	277648	280052	SPBC660.05	SPAC3H8.09c	SPBC660.05	nab3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.336355002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781714	2541133	2541532	277648	278032	SPBC660.05	SPAC2C4.15c	SPBC660.05	ubx2	-	ucp13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.208948413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781715	2541133	2541187	277648	277701	SPBC660.05	SPBC776.14	SPBC660.05	plh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.838911284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781716	2541133	2540665	277648	277190	SPBC660.05	SPBC83.02c	SPBC660.05	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642370278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781717	2541133	2542874	277648	279319	SPBC660.05	SPAC20H4.09	SPBC660.05	SPAC20H4.09	-	SPAC145.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330395198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781718	2541133	2542014	277648	278497	SPBC660.05	SPAC20H4.04	SPBC660.05	fml2	-	mfh2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.676260088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781719	2541133	2540224	277648	276757	SPBC660.05	SPBC32H8.06	SPBC660.05	mug93	-	pi018|SPACTOKYO_453.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.188516232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781720	2541133	2543392	277648	279814	SPBC660.05	SPAC8F11.03	SPBC660.05	msh3	-	swi4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.689486533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781721	2541133	2540836	277648	277354	SPBC660.05	SPBC18H10.19	SPBC660.05	vps38	-	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.910371144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781722	2541133	2541882	277648	278372	SPBC660.05	SPAC2F7.09c	SPBC660.05	SPAC2F7.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38708095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781723	2541133	2542867	277648	279312	SPBC660.05	SPAC343.16	SPBC660.05	lys2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.774090974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781724	2541133	2541708	277648	278203	SPBC660.05	SPAC31A2.02	SPBC660.05	trm112	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.131780849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781725	2541133	2540180	277648	276713	SPBC660.05	SPBC16D10.11c	SPBC660.05	rps1801	-	rps18-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323120216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781726	2541133	2541266	277648	277780	SPBC660.05	SPBP16F5.05c	SPBC660.05	yar1	-	SPBP16F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582418286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781727	2541133	2540229	277648	276761	SPBC660.05	SPBC31F10.15c	SPBC660.05	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445125263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781728	2541133	3361520	277648	280596	SPBC660.05	SPAC1610.02c	SPBC660.05	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818674558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781729	2541133	2539160	277648	275732	SPBC660.05	SPCC18.17c	SPBC660.05	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.132326959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781730	2541133	2543096	277648	279528	SPBC660.05	SPAC977.05c	SPBC660.05	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.051439336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781731	2541133	2543192	277648	279621	SPBC660.05	SPAC343.18	SPBC660.05	rfp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875241867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781732	2541133	2542355	277648	278820	SPBC660.05	SPAC29A4.13	SPBC660.05	SPAC29A4.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.646862941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781733	2541133	2540325	277648	276855	SPBC660.05	SPBC21B10.10	SPBC660.05	rps402	-	rps4-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.32022306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781734	2541133	2542386	277648	278850	SPBC660.05	SPAC1805.01c	SPBC660.05	ppk6	-	SPAPJ736.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.983582663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781735	2541133	2540489	277648	277017	SPBC660.05	SPBC25H2.03	SPBC660.05	SPBC25H2.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503574781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781736	2541133	2540333	277648	276863	SPBC660.05	SPBC21B10.07	SPBC660.05	SPBC21B10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.885327102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781737	2541133	2542442	277648	278904	SPBC660.05	SPACUNK12.02c	SPBC660.05	cmk1	-	CaMK-I|SPAC25D11.02C	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926204414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781738	2541133	2543380	277648	279802	SPBC660.05	SPAC4G9.16c	SPBC660.05	rpl901	-	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45072569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781739	2541133	2538827	277648	275408	SPBC660.05	SPCC63.14	SPBC660.05	eis1	-	SPCC63.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.754587608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781740	2541133	2541872	277648	278362	SPBC660.05	SPAC23H4.10c	SPBC660.05	thi4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325116347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781741	2541133	2541491	277648	277993	SPBC660.05	SPAC2C4.16c	SPBC660.05	rps801	-	rps8|rps8-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632829291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781742	2541133	2543523	277648	279941	SPBC660.05	SPAC4F10.16c	SPBC660.05	SPAC4F10.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923166015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781743	2541133	2539292	277648	275860	SPBC660.05	SPCC4G3.02	SPBC660.05	aph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.262983217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781744	2541133	2540736	277648	277259	SPBC660.05	SPBC19F8.02	SPBC660.05	SPBC19F8.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77118785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781745	2541137	2538939	277652	275514	SPBC660.06	SPCC1672.04c	SPBC660.06	SPCC1672.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.877730487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781746	2541137	2543434	277652	279854	SPBC660.06	SPAC8F11.02c	SPBC660.06	dph3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567554387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781747	2541137	2541227	277652	277741	SPBC660.06	SPBC947.05c	SPBC660.06	frp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.31947491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781748	2541137	2541905	277652	278395	SPBC660.06	SPAC6G9.01c	SPBC660.06	SPAC6G9.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.320366387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781749	2541137	2540797	277652	277316	SPBC660.06	SPBC18H10.11c	SPBC660.06	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.566549379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781750	2541137	2539898	277652	276444	SPBC660.06	SPBC12D12.07c	SPBC660.06	trx2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318988277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781751	2541137	2539231	277652	275801	SPBC660.06	SPCC1672.03c	SPBC660.06	SPCC1672.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576068812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781752	2541137	2541266	277652	277780	SPBC660.06	SPBP16F5.05c	SPBC660.06	yar1	-	SPBP16F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.914705054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781753	2541137	2539438	277652	276001	SPBC660.06	SPCC4B3.07	SPBC660.06	nro1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581736288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781754	2541137	2543670	277652	280084	SPBC660.06	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC660.06	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.751631854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781755	2541137	2543419	277652	279841	SPBC660.06	SPAPB24D3.02c	SPBC660.06	SPAPB24D3.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51502019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781756	2541137	2543600	277652	280015	SPBC660.06	SPAPB1A10.05	SPBC660.06	SPAPB1A10.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.062796998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781757	2541137	2542076	277652	278553	SPBC660.06	SPAC29A4.19c	SPBC660.06	cta5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.191060757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781758	2541137	3361329	277652	280405	SPBC660.06	SPBC25H2.10c	SPBC660.06	SPBC25H2.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578525246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781759	2541137	2541122	277652	277637	SPBC660.06	SPBC646.06c	SPBC660.06	agn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.917311218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781760	2541137	2541806	277652	278297	SPBC660.06	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC660.06	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.981137168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781761	2541137	2539001	277652	275575	SPBC660.06	SPCC1494.08c	SPBC660.06	SPCC1494.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.502157785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781762	2541115	2543617	277630	280031	SPBC660.07	SPAC4A8.10	ntp1	SPAC4A8.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.70148903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781763	2541115	2542127	277630	278603	SPBC660.07	SPAC1952.12c	ntp1	csn71	-	csn7|csn7a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.937482631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781764	2541115	2539309	277630	275876	SPBC660.07	SPCC4G3.19	ntp1	alp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.396694118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781765	2541115	2540664	277630	277189	SPBC660.07	SPBC215.02	ntp1	bob1	-	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.157457825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781766	2541115	2542050	277630	278529	SPBC660.07	SPAC212.02	ntp1	SPAC212.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.610609222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781767	2541115	2540220	277630	276753	SPBC660.07	SPBC337.03	ntp1	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.950894814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781768	2541115	2539310	277630	275877	SPBC660.07	SPCC285.17	ntp1	spp27	-	uaf30	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.160695442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781769	2541115	2543514	277630	279932	SPBC660.07	SPAC4D7.03	ntp1	pop2	-	sud1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.937553556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781770	2541115	2540363	277630	276892	SPBC660.07	SPBC2F12.09c	ntp1	atf21	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.106629409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781771	2541115	2540628	277630	277154	SPBC660.07	SPBC25B2.08	ntp1	SPBC25B2.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.394540336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781772	2541115	2541410	277630	277918	SPBC660.07	SPBPB2B2.17c	ntp1	SPBPB2B2.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.987563903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781773	2541115	2541746	277630	278240	SPBC660.07	SPAC20G4.04c	ntp1	hus1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.819376552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781774	2541115	2543329	277630	279752	SPBC660.07	SPAC56F8.02	ntp1	SPAC56F8.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.858344667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781775	2541115	2542418	277630	278881	SPBC660.07	SPAC1805.07c	ntp1	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.788823705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781776	2541115	2539189	277630	275760	SPBC660.07	SPCC1682.16	ntp1	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.879009259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781777	2541115	2541806	277630	278297	SPBC660.07	SPAC4G8.13c	ntp1	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5948159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781778	2541115	2542073	277630	278550	SPBC660.07	SPAC26F1.01	ntp1	sec74	-	SPAPJ691.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32800566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781779	2541115	2540787	277630	277306	SPBC660.07	SPBC1921.07c	ntp1	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.936821332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781780	2541299	2541488	277811	277990	SPBP19A11.06	SPAC227.17c	lid2	SPAC227.17c	SPBP4H10.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.975702425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781781	2539310	2540686	275877	277211	SPCC285.17	SPBC21D10.10	spp27	bdc1	uaf30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.349037563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781782	2539310	2538922	275877	275499	SPCC285.17	SPCC16C4.10	spp27	SPCC16C4.10	uaf30	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.762393976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781783	2539310	2542318	275877	278784	SPCC285.17	SPAC16C9.05	spp27	cph1	uaf30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382288198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781784	2539310	2538906	275877	275483	SPCC285.17	SPCC1259.03	spp27	rpa12	uaf30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.436075155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781785	2539310	2539023	275877	275596	SPCC285.17	SPCC594.05c	spp27	spf1	uaf30	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.300991422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781786	2539310	2541496	275877	277998	SPCC285.17	SPAC23D3.09	spp27	arp42	uaf30	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.879696923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781787	2539310	2543396	275877	279818	SPCC285.17	SPAC4D7.11	spp27	dsc4	uaf30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.785238266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781788	2539310	2542032	275877	278514	SPCC285.17	SPAC23C11.04c	spp27	pnk1	uaf30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574519942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781789	2539310	2542007	275877	278490	SPCC285.17	SPAC20H4.07	spp27	rad57	uaf30	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.207232865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781790	2539310	2542519	275877	278977	SPCC285.17	SPAC19G12.08	spp27	scs7	uaf30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64135207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781791	2539310	2540967	275877	277483	SPCC285.17	SPBC36B7.08c	spp27	SPBC36B7.08c	uaf30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.62736199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781792	2539310	2540533	275877	277061	SPCC285.17	SPBC29A10.16c	spp27	SPBC29A10.16c	uaf30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.846750079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781793	2539310	2538884	275877	275462	SPCC285.17	SPCC1393.08	spp27	SPCC1393.08	uaf30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388758445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781794	2539310	2541156	275877	277671	SPCC285.17	SPBC685.07c	spp27	rpl2701	uaf30	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.813336846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781795	2539310	2541175	275877	277689	SPCC285.17	SPBC839.13c	spp27	rpl1601	uaf30	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.07790591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781796	2539310	2539925	275877	276469	SPCC285.17	SPBC16H5.13	spp27	SPBC16H5.13	uaf30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391128101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781797	2539310	2543304	275877	279728	SPCC285.17	SPAC6B12.12	spp27	tom70	uaf30	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.863764289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781798	2539310	2541531	275877	278031	SPCC285.17	SPAC25A8.01c	spp27	fft3	uaf30	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.745057521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781799	2539310	2541789	275877	278281	SPCC285.17	SPAC23H4.08	spp27	iwr1	uaf30	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.311098778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781800	2539310	2541115	275877	277630	SPCC285.17	SPBC660.07	spp27	ntp1	uaf30	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.160695442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781801	2539310	2540551	275877	277078	SPCC285.17	SPBC23E6.01c	spp27	cxr1	uaf30	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.944276352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781802	2539310	2540558	275877	277085	SPCC285.17	SPBC2D10.17	spp27	clr1	uaf30	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.558934617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781803	2539310	2542440	275877	278902	SPCC285.17	SPAC17A2.12	spp27	rrp1	uaf30	SPAC17A2.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.996564172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781804	2542592	2542577	279047	279033	SPAC328.01c	SPAC19G12.15c	msn5	tpp1	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.696542926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781805	2542592	2540979	279047	277495	SPAC328.01c	SPBC3H7.10	msn5	elp6	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.210412171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781806	2542592	2541580	279047	278077	SPAC328.01c	SPAC1687.05	msn5	pli1	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.02525235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781807	2542592	2541708	279047	278203	SPAC328.01c	SPAC31A2.02	msn5	trm112	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.365843967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781808	2542592	2541017	279047	277532	SPAC328.01c	SPBC36.07	msn5	elp1	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.211988656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781809	2542592	2540800	279047	277319	SPAC328.01c	SPBC409.20c	msn5	psh3	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.978481981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781810	2542592	2539178	279047	275749	SPAC328.01c	SPCC1682.14	msn5	rpl1902	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	rpl19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5195298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781811	2542592	2543087	279047	279520	SPAC328.01c	SPAC30C2.04	msn5	SPAC30C2.04	SPAC328.01c|SPAC3A11.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.626051378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781812	2540555	2539147	277082	275719	SPBP16F5.02	SPCC622.12c	mcs2	gdh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.379133627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781813	2540555	2539841	277082	276389	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC17D1.05	mcs2	SPBC17D1.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.80691113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781814	2540555	2539788	277082	276338	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC17D1.02	mcs2	dph2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.355504352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781815	2540555	2538961	277082	275535	SPBP16F5.02	SPCC285.14	mcs2	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.169082959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781816	2540555	2540913	277082	277429	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC56F2.08c	mcs2	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.592411038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781817	2540555	2541818	277082	278309	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC11G7.02	mcs2	pub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64702914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781818	2540555	2543064	277082	279497	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC3G6.01	mcs2	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.115169478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781819	2540555	2539965	277082	276509	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC1685.14c	mcs2	SPBC1685.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391759215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781820	2540555	2539156	277082	275728	SPBP16F5.02	SPCC1450.08c	mcs2	wtf16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441416667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781821	2540555	2542197	277082	278672	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC1142.01	mcs2	rqc1	-	SPAC1142.01|SPAC17G6.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.162158581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781822	2540555	2542928	277082	279369	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC1142.06	mcs2	get3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.716691598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781823	2540555	2539582	277082	276141	SPBP16F5.02	SPCC594.07c	mcs2	bqt3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.004539657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781824	2540555	2541117	277082	277632	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC646.13	mcs2	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.849560467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781825	2540555	2542502	277082	278960	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC139.06	mcs2	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.811841339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781826	2540555	2543376	277082	279798	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC3H1.06c	mcs2	SPAC3H1.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.401849755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781827	2540555	2541633	277082	278129	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC664.01c	mcs2	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.877396168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781828	2540555	2540168	277082	276703	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC1683.06c	mcs2	SPBC1683.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.074033454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781829	2540555	2540694	277082	277218	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC19C7.10	mcs2	bqt4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.842704639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781830	2540555	2543434	277082	279854	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC8F11.02c	mcs2	dph3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.41229511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781831	2540555	5802945	277082	858083	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC19G12.16c	mcs2	adg2	-	SPAC23A1.01c|mug46	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.485675567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781832	2540555	3361375	277082	280451	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC212.06c	mcs2	SPAC212.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.408008785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781833	2540555	3361570	277082	280646	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC750.01	mcs2	SPAC750.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706411726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781834	2540555	2539226	277082	275796	SPBP16F5.02	SPCC16C4.20c	mcs2	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.43607535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781835	2540555	2540975	277082	277491	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC354.12	mcs2	gpd3	-	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.40160881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781836	2540555	2541200	277082	277714	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC8D2.03c	mcs2	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189818453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781837	2540555	2541313	277082	277825	SPBP16F5.02	SPBP26C9.02c	mcs2	car1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781838	2540555	2542273	277082	278742	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC17H9.13c	mcs2	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992593657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781839	2540555	2541500	277082	278002	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC227.18	mcs2	lys3	-	SPAC2F7.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.724925589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781840	2540555	2539264	277082	275834	SPBP16F5.02	SPCC550.10	mcs2	atd3	-	meu8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.631554926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781841	2540555	2540029	277082	276573	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC16A3.01	mcs2	spn3	-	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.37061914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781842	2540555	2540945	277082	277461	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC342.06c	mcs2	rtt109	-	kat11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.120870447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781843	2540555	2540692	277082	277217	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC800.07c	mcs2	tsf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711826493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781844	2540555	2540220	277082	276753	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC337.03	mcs2	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.184622293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781845	2540555	2540160	277082	276695	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC1773.17c	mcs2	SPBC1773.17c	-	SPBP26C9.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.3661285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781846	2540555	2543048	277082	279483	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC3F10.02c	mcs2	trk1	-	sptrk	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.373666074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781847	2540555	2540993	277082	277509	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC342.01c	mcs2	alg6	-	SPBC3F6.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771705287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781848	2540555	2542022	277082	278505	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC23A1.03	mcs2	apt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.359617354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781849	2540555	2542318	277082	278784	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC16C9.05	mcs2	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.739208478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781850	2540555	2541527	277082	278027	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC31A2.09c	mcs2	apm4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.807218284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781851	2540555	2539823	277082	276373	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC16A3.18	mcs2	cip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.247514608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781852	2540555	2541597	277082	278094	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC29E6.09	mcs2	SPAC29E6.09	-	SPAC30.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.790346166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781853	2540555	2540595	277082	277121	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC21C3.02c	mcs2	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.938227307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781854	2540555	2541014	277082	277529	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC3D6.06c	mcs2	prs5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090734523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781855	2540555	2539352	277082	275918	SPBP16F5.02	SPCC188.07	mcs2	ccq1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.484641091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781856	2540555	2543319	277082	279743	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC6B12.09	mcs2	trm10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.675009808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781857	2540555	2541489	277082	277991	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC23D3.11	mcs2	ayr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320626097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781858	2540555	2542253	277082	278723	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC17H9.04c	mcs2	SPAC17H9.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.054535751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781859	2540555	2542981	277082	279419	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC824.02	mcs2	bst1	-	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.35426996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781860	2540555	2542034	277082	278516	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC27E2.04c	mcs2	mug155	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.474064035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781861	2540555	2541021	277082	277536	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC3B8.10c	mcs2	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.604789798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781862	2540555	2540964	277082	277480	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC365.16	mcs2	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.716207355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781863	2540555	2543573	277082	279988	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC869.11	mcs2	cat1	-	SPAC922.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.49201968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781864	2540555	2542239	277082	278711	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC18G6.02c	mcs2	chp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388238227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781865	2540555	2543349	277082	279771	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC977.02	mcs2	SPAC977.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.347379761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781866	2540555	2541938	277082	278425	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC8C9.16c	mcs2	mug63	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.636644091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781867	2540555	2539051	277082	275624	SPBP16F5.02	SPCC1183.11	mcs2	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.831983042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781868	2540555	2539705	277082	276258	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC1105.10	mcs2	rav1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.811395453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781869	2540555	2542950	277082	279390	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC12B10.03	mcs2	bun62	-	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.414566429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781870	2540555	2541741	277082	278235	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC20G4.02c	mcs2	fus1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.905425564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781871	2540555	2538821	277082	275402	SPBP16F5.02	SPCC584.01c	mcs2	SPCC584.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.409822146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781872	2540555	2541801	277082	278292	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC2F7.08c	mcs2	snf5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.171494557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781873	2540555	2540892	277082	277408	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC530.01	mcs2	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.887682674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781874	2540555	2543593	277082	280008	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC4G9.10	mcs2	arg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.490487922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781875	2540555	2540401	277082	276929	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC2A9.02	mcs2	SPBC2A9.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.023203295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781876	2540555	2542652	277082	279106	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC1687.15	mcs2	gsk3	-	skp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.541222014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781877	2540555	2540396	277082	276924	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC31F10.12	mcs2	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.913769068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781878	2540555	2542160	277082	278636	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC8C9.11	mcs2	fra2	-	SPAC8C9.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.133537256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781879	2540555	2541658	277082	278154	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC25B8.09	mcs2	SPAC25B8.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582694586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781880	2540555	2542989	277082	279427	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC11E3.13c	mcs2	gas5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.33263301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781881	2540555	2539484	277082	276047	SPBP16F5.02	SPCC594.04c	mcs2	SPCC594.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.841486228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781882	2540555	2539999	277082	276543	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC1734.15	mcs2	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.31875042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781883	2540555	2541183	277082	277697	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC725.14	mcs2	arg6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.961039168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781884	2540555	2542860	277082	279306	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC8C9.09c	mcs2	mug129	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510380245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781885	2540555	2543101	277082	279533	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC323.03c	mcs2	SPAC323.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.612818194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781886	2540555	2543643	277082	280057	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC3G9.07c	mcs2	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.183278193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781887	2540555	2540231	277082	276763	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC336.14c	mcs2	ppk26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.726384713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781888	2540555	2543250	277082	279678	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC3G9.15c	mcs2	fcf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.372254567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781889	2540555	2538852	277082	275433	SPBP16F5.02	SPCC4E9.01c	mcs2	rec11	-	SPCC550.16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.398392192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781890	2540555	2541710	277082	278205	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC343.11c	mcs2	msc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.378798737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781891	2540555	2538769	277082	275352	SPBP16F5.02	SPCC126.04c	mcs2	sgf73	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.667842227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781892	2540555	2539667	277082	276222	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC13G1.08c	mcs2	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.342370967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781893	2540555	2542126	277082	278602	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC1B3.05	mcs2	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638134572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781894	2540555	2542032	277082	278514	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC23C11.04c	mcs2	pnk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922062866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781895	2540555	2538873	277082	275452	SPBP16F5.02	SPCC306.11	mcs2	SPCC306.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.870426959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781896	2540555	2542710	277082	279163	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC750.08c	mcs2	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.929840297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781897	2540555	2538945	277082	275519	SPBP16F5.02	SPCC1739.06c	mcs2	SPCC1739.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.490392784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781898	2540555	2542946	277082	279386	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC6F12.03c	mcs2	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.659654976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781899	2540555	2542976	277082	279414	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC9E9.09c	mcs2	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.52952934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781900	2540555	2539815	277082	276365	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC1105.02c	mcs2	lys4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.290824997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781901	2540555	2541720	277082	278214	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC23H3.13c	mcs2	gpa2	-	git8	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.833238501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781902	2540555	2543253	277082	279681	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC8C9.05	mcs2	SPAC8C9.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51842194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781903	2540555	2543495	277082	279914	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC513.03	mcs2	mfm2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.345240519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781904	2540555	2541248	277082	277762	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC8D2.10c	mcs2	rmt3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.776064359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781905	2540555	2542254	277082	278724	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC30D11.04c	mcs2	nup124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.972093832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781906	2540555	2542867	277082	279312	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC343.16	mcs2	lys2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.002846152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781907	2540555	2540318	277082	276848	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC30B4.04c	mcs2	sol1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.205721634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781908	2540555	2541009	277082	277524	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC428.04	mcs2	apq12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.480896802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781909	2540555	5802861	277082	857999	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC1D4.01	mcs2	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.407524892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781910	2540555	2539953	277082	276497	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC1709.11c	mcs2	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.722848158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781911	2540555	2543683	277082	280097	SPBP16F5.02	SPAPB1E7.04c	mcs2	SPAPB1E7.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.064575642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781912	2540555	2542056	277082	278535	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC6G9.14	mcs2	SPAC6G9.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.902694129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781913	2540555	2540990	277082	277506	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC36B7.06c	mcs2	mug20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929994196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781914	2540555	2541694	277082	278190	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC1071.04c	mcs2	spc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449547555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781915	2540555	2539317	277082	275883	SPBP16F5.02	SPCC16A11.08	mcs2	atg20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810629015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781916	2540555	2541536	277082	278036	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC1071.02	mcs2	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.409328459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781917	2540555	2540201	277082	276734	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC13A2.04c	mcs2	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.046222101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781918	2540555	2539427	277082	275992	SPBP16F5.02	SPCC663.15c	mcs2	SPCC663.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.729116122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781919	2540555	2538884	277082	275462	SPBP16F5.02	SPCC1393.08	mcs2	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.443805646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781920	2540555	2539527	277082	276089	SPBP16F5.02	SPCC338.16	mcs2	pof3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811598748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781921	2540555	2540930	277082	277446	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC354.10	mcs2	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.251256872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781922	2540555	2538848	277082	275429	SPBP16F5.02	SPCC613.12c	mcs2	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.853557166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781923	2540555	2541017	277082	277532	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC36.07	mcs2	elp1	-	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.091685941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781924	2540555	2540643	277082	277168	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC19G7.06	mcs2	mbx1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.350043056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781925	2540555	2542673	277082	279126	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC26A3.11	mcs2	SPAC26A3.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.788111513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781926	2540555	2542875	277082	279320	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC13G7.02c	mcs2	ssa1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.321204674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781927	2540555	2541713	277082	278208	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC3A12.12	mcs2	atp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.083469508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781928	2540555	2540001	277082	276545	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC1289.13c	mcs2	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.741461251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781929	2540555	2542170	277082	278645	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC17G8.13c	mcs2	mst2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.989524401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781930	2540555	2539706	277082	276259	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC16G5.13	mcs2	ptf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.701250887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781931	2540555	2540706	277082	277229	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC19C7.12c	mcs2	omh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.485165143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781932	2540555	2539160	277082	275732	SPBP16F5.02	SPCC18.17c	mcs2	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.814195778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781933	2540555	2541798	277082	278289	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC22F3.03c	mcs2	rdh54	-	mug34|tid1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.167915676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781934	2540555	2543391	277082	279813	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC4G9.09c	mcs2	arg11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.466186922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781935	2540555	2542759	277082	279209	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC9G1.07	mcs2	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.046307343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781936	2540555	2541370	277082	277881	SPBP16F5.02	SPBP8B7.07c	mcs2	set6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.305639096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781937	2540555	2542769	277082	279219	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC15A10.10	mcs2	mde6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446933104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781938	2540555	2542516	277082	278974	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC2F7.04	mcs2	pmc2	-	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.678124835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781939	2540555	2539555	277082	276116	SPBP16F5.02	SPCC4B3.08	mcs2	lsg1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.300437672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781940	2540555	2539137	277082	275709	SPBP16F5.02	SPCC1682.08c	mcs2	mcp2	-	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.72436408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781941	2540555	2542883	277082	279328	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC1486.04c	mcs2	alm1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815060501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781942	2540555	2538717	277082	275301	SPBP16F5.02	SPCC1235.02	mcs2	bio2	-	SPCC320.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.968215674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781943	2540555	2539159	277082	275731	SPBP16F5.02	SPCC1235.01	mcs2	SPCC1235.01	-	SPCC320.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.731496547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781944	2540555	2539246	277082	275816	SPBP16F5.02	SPCC18.13	mcs2	SPCC18.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.930554787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781945	2540555	2540960	277082	277476	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC3D6.02	mcs2	but2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.692122512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781946	2540555	2540531	277082	277059	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC23E6.08	mcs2	sat1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.570754075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781947	2540555	2543066	277082	279499	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC343.12	mcs2	rds1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.032882792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781948	2540555	2543662	277082	280076	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC9.07c	mcs2	SPAC9.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.92725131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781949	2540555	2539239	277082	275809	SPBP16F5.02	SPCC1020.10	mcs2	oca2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707040563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781950	2540555	2540115	277082	276652	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC1778.02	mcs2	rap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.359800537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781951	2540555	2541531	277082	278031	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC25A8.01c	mcs2	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.909877576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781952	2540555	2543329	277082	279752	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC56F8.02	mcs2	SPAC56F8.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.556432718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781953	2540555	2543439	277082	279859	SPBP16F5.02	SPAPB1A10.13	mcs2	SPAPB1A10.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.754991966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781954	2540555	2543437	277082	279857	SPBP16F5.02	SPAPB1A10.14	mcs2	pof15	-	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.118055075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781955	2540555	2541404	277082	277913	SPBP16F5.02	SPBPB2B2.18	mcs2	SPBPB2B2.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.470962967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781956	2540555	2540516	277082	277044	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC21C3.01c	mcs2	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.469899474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781957	2540555	2542305	277082	278772	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC8C9.10c	mcs2	rrp14	-	SPAC8C9.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.573325418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781958	2540555	2539928	277082	276472	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC1604.08c	mcs2	imp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.896933929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781959	2540555	2539726	277082	276278	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC13E7.08c	mcs2	leo1	-	SPBC13E7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.352026481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781960	2540555	2539375	277082	275941	SPBP16F5.02	SPCC4G3.11	mcs2	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.339085507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781961	2540555	2539169	277082	275740	SPBP16F5.02	SPCC1235.11	mcs2	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.500112717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781962	2540555	2542716	277082	279169	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC25H1.07	mcs2	emc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990256271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781963	2540555	2541806	277082	278297	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC4G8.13c	mcs2	prz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.879880708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781964	2540555	2543327	277082	279750	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC1D4.06c	mcs2	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.216847797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781965	2540555	2541627	277082	278123	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC1F5.08c	mcs2	yam8	-	ehs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.676297297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781966	2540555	2541050	277082	277565	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC428.05c	mcs2	arg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.248790495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781967	2540555	2543333	277082	279756	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC694.02	mcs2	SPAC694.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.741892166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781968	2540555	2543090	277082	279523	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC1348.01	mcs2	SPBC1348.01	-	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.860516144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781969	2540555	2542460	277082	278921	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC1F12.03c	mcs2	SPAC1F12.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512978919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781970	2540555	2542943	277082	279384	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC1348.03	mcs2	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.946644085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781971	2540555	2542617	277082	279071	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC13A11.01c	mcs2	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.278706787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781972	2540555	2543501	277082	279919	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC664.14	mcs2	amt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.260946158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781973	2540555	2540734	277082	277257	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC19G7.09	mcs2	ulp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.876775124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781974	2540555	2542571	277082	279027	SPBP16F5.02	SPAC589.02c	mcs2	med13	-	spTrap240|srb9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099280641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781975	2542414	2542268	278878	278737	SPAC6F6.16c	SPAC17A5.07c	tpz1	ulp2	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.390559127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781976	2542414	2542177	278878	278652	SPAC6F6.16c	SPAC17H9.08	tpz1	SPAC17H9.08	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.320338277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781977	2542414	2541488	278878	277990	SPAC6F6.16c	SPAC227.17c	tpz1	SPAC227.17c	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.483271463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781978	2542153	2542499	278629	278958	SPAC1952.10c	SPAC1F12.04c	SPAC1952.10c	SPAC1F12.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.817887533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781979	2542153	2541142	278629	277657	SPAC1952.10c	SPBC725.04	SPAC1952.10c	SPBC725.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703141603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781980	2542153	2538730	278629	275314	SPAC1952.10c	SPCC31H12.02c	SPAC1952.10c	mug73	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.27851667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781981	2540585	2543064	277111	279497	SPBC28F2.04c	SPAC3G6.01	cwf7	hrp3	spf27	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.335999342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781982	2540585	2539792	277111	276342	SPBC28F2.04c	SPBC1271.14	cwf7	SPBC1271.14	spf27	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.563955157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781983	2540585	2538770	277111	275353	SPBC28F2.04c	SPCC1753.02c	cwf7	git3	spf27	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099725535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781984	2540585	2543638	277111	280052	SPBC28F2.04c	SPAC3H8.09c	cwf7	nab3	spf27	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933529813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781985	2540585	2538769	277111	275352	SPBC28F2.04c	SPCC126.04c	cwf7	sgf73	spf27	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.312376958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781986	2540585	2542528	277111	278986	SPBC28F2.04c	SPAC1B3.08	cwf7	SPAC1B3.08	spf27	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.910449283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781987	2540585	2542416	277111	278880	SPBC28F2.04c	SPAC589.03c	cwf7	SPAC589.03c	spf27	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390742271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781988	2540585	2541675	277111	278171	SPBC28F2.04c	SPAC22F8.12c	cwf7	shf1	spf27	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317110843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781989	2543651	2540913	280065	277429	SPAC644.11c	SPBC56F2.08c	pkp1	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.300588711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781990	2543651	2543432	280065	279852	SPAC644.11c	SPAC4G8.05	pkp1	ppk14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035515028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781991	2543651	2542318	280065	278784	SPAC644.11c	SPAC16C9.05	pkp1	cph1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.88992581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781992	2543651	2542268	280065	278737	SPAC644.11c	SPAC17A5.07c	pkp1	ulp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.557099193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781993	2543651	2542177	280065	278652	SPAC644.11c	SPAC17H9.08	pkp1	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.970244399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781994	2543651	2541496	280065	277998	SPAC644.11c	SPAC23D3.09	pkp1	arp42	-	arp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.832429304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781995	2543651	2541241	280065	277755	SPAC644.11c	SPBC887.17	pkp1	SPBC887.17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194794915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781996	2543651	2542008	280065	278491	SPAC644.11c	SPAC2G11.07c	pkp1	ptc3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.449415358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781997	2543651	3361520	280065	280596	SPAC644.11c	SPAC1610.02c	pkp1	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981232058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781998	2543651	2541806	280065	278297	SPAC644.11c	SPAC4G8.13c	pkp1	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.601318351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
781999	2541380	2540999	277891	277515	SPBPB2B2.13	SPBC4B4.04	gal1	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.596406548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782000	2541380	2542677	277891	279130	SPBPB2B2.13	SPAC26F1.10c	gal1	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.667063559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782001	2541380	2542135	277891	278611	SPBPB2B2.13	SPAC13A11.04c	gal1	ubp8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.248676564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782002	2541380	2542318	277891	278784	SPBPB2B2.13	SPAC16C9.05	gal1	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.899059273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782003	2541380	2541801	277891	278292	SPBPB2B2.13	SPAC2F7.08c	gal1	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.126404559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782004	2541380	2543396	277891	279818	SPBPB2B2.13	SPAC4D7.11	gal1	dsc4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.179269555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782005	2541380	2541175	277891	277689	SPBPB2B2.13	SPBC839.13c	gal1	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.011647005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782006	2541380	2541789	277891	278281	SPBPB2B2.13	SPAC23H4.08	gal1	iwr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201490374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782007	2541380	2541806	277891	278297	SPBPB2B2.13	SPAC4G8.13c	gal1	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.819313276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782008	2541380	2542440	277891	278902	SPBPB2B2.13	SPAC17A2.12	gal1	rrp1	-	SPAC17A2.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.885291763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782009	2541380	2542943	277891	279384	SPBPB2B2.13	SPBC1348.03	gal1	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.4950636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782010	2542239	2539050	278711	275623	SPAC18G6.02c	SPCC11E10.08	chp1	rik1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.921515412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782011	2542239	2542895	278711	279339	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC13G6.10c	chp1	asl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321663603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782012	2542239	2541902	278711	278392	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC27E2.07	chp1	pvg2	-	mug53	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.371992365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782013	2542239	2540060	278711	276598	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC106.01	chp1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.05606483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782014	2542239	2543529	278711	279947	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC4C5.02c	chp1	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.752503176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782015	2542239	2543064	278711	279497	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC3G6.01	chp1	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582691694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782016	2542239	2542358	278711	278823	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC1782.09c	chp1	clp1	-	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.629095453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782017	2542239	2539226	278711	275796	SPAC18G6.02c	SPCC16C4.20c	chp1	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377300037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782018	2542239	2540975	278711	277491	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC354.12	chp1	gpd3	-	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.258562943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782019	2542239	2539420	278711	275985	SPAC18G6.02c	SPCC970.07c	chp1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.930509545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782020	2542239	2541026	278711	277541	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC337.09	chp1	erg28	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928804956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782021	2542239	2542627	278711	279081	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC750.04c	chp1	SPAC750.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981451839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782022	2542239	2542318	278711	278784	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC16C9.05	chp1	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.291155121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782023	2542239	2543584	278711	279999	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAPB1E7.11c	chp1	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.848962901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782024	2542239	2540825	278711	277343	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC428.08c	chp1	clr4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.047199656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782025	2542239	2542554	278711	279011	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC1952.03	chp1	otu2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327329475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782026	2542239	2542568	278711	279024	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC1952.02	chp1	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38505366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782027	2542239	2543573	278711	279988	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC869.11	chp1	cat1	-	SPAC922.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392506381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782028	2542239	2542036	278711	278518	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC23A1.19c	chp1	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.54889074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782029	2542239	2539098	278711	275670	SPAC18G6.02c	SPCC24B10.18	chp1	SPCC24B10.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.180658591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782030	2542239	2542371	278711	278835	SPAC18G6.02c	SPACUNK4.17	chp1	SPACUNK4.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377733336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782031	2542239	2542695	278711	279148	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC12B10.09	chp1	pet801	-	SPAC12B10.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317461926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782032	2542239	2542596	278711	279050	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC1B3.17	chp1	clr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.773738891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782033	2542239	2541249	278711	277763	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC947.01	chp1	alf1	-	SPBC947.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979300446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782034	2542239	2540429	278711	276957	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC29A10.07	chp1	pom152	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324727845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782035	2542239	2540352	278711	276881	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC215.03c	chp1	csn1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.202464821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782036	2542239	2540673	278711	277198	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC1D7.03	chp1	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.292012758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782037	2542239	2540150	278711	276687	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC16E9.14c	chp1	zrg17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.791431728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782038	2542239	2541889	278711	278379	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC2F7.03c	chp1	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446035328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782039	2542239	2541496	278711	277998	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC23D3.09	chp1	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708445557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782040	2542239	2540665	278711	277190	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC83.02c	chp1	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.995212121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782041	2542239	2542519	278711	278977	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC19G12.08	chp1	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7837336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782042	2542239	2542056	278711	278535	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC6G9.14	chp1	SPAC6G9.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.740095444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782043	2542239	2539348	278711	275914	SPAC18G6.02c	SPCC18B5.07c	chp1	nup61	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.330519404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782044	2542239	2538884	278711	275462	SPAC18G6.02c	SPCC1393.08	chp1	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.774539204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782045	2542239	2542255	278711	278725	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC57A7.08	chp1	pzh1	-	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319648896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782046	2542239	2539569	278711	276129	SPAC18G6.02c	SPCPB16A4.03c	chp1	ade10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320094845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782047	2542239	2539812	278711	276362	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC1347.02	chp1	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.835199286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782048	2542239	2540930	278711	277446	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC354.10	chp1	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.687735709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782049	2542239	2538848	278711	275429	SPAC18G6.02c	SPCC613.12c	chp1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.768507916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782050	2542239	2540821	278711	277339	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC800.03	chp1	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.592773321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782051	2542239	2543275	278711	279703	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC1002.05c	chp1	jmj2	-	kdm5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.592274165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782052	2542239	2540115	278711	276652	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC1778.02	chp1	rap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389106592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782053	2542239	2540829	278711	277347	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC800.09	chp1	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770908698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782054	2542239	2539136	278711	275708	SPAC18G6.02c	SPCC1919.05	chp1	SPCC1919.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.031007656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782055	2542239	2540677	278711	277202	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC21B10.03c	chp1	ath1	-	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779398974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782056	2542239	2542685	278711	279138	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC26A3.06	chp1	bud23	-	SPAC26A3.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.912737765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782057	2542239	2540555	278711	277082	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBP16F5.02	chp1	mcs2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388238227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782058	2542239	2539920	278711	276464	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC119.08	chp1	pmk1	-	spm1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.947224528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782059	2542239	2543337	278711	279760	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC959.08	chp1	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.269485882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782060	2542239	2538792	278711	275373	SPAC18G6.02c	SPCP1E11.10	chp1	SPCP1E11.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576418678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782061	2542239	2540409	278711	276937	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC2D10.11c	chp1	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.829763406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782062	2542239	2543387	278711	279809	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAPB1E7.02c	chp1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.636603683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782063	2542239	2542886	278711	279331	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC1486.01	chp1	SPAC1486.01	-	sod2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506344018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782064	2542239	2540558	278711	277085	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC2D10.17	chp1	clr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.17894004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782065	2542239	2540481	278711	277009	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC2D10.12	chp1	rhp23	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19351668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782066	2539882	2540415	276428	276943	SPBC15D4.14	SPBC30B4.06c	taf73	SPBC30B4.06c	taf5|taf5l	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439858249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782067	2539882	2541694	276428	278190	SPBC15D4.14	SPAC1071.04c	taf73	spc2	taf5|taf5l	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.549229946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782068	2539960	2539050	276504	275623	SPBC15D4.15	SPCC11E10.08	pho2	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.935526084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782069	2539960	2541912	276504	278402	SPBC15D4.15	SPAC222.16c	pho2	csn3	-	SPAC821.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982873711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782070	2539960	2540535	276504	277062	SPBC15D4.15	SPBC215.01	pho2	SPBC215.01	-	SPBC3B9.20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450166531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782071	2539960	2539420	276504	275985	SPBC15D4.15	SPCC970.07c	pho2	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.219661658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782072	2539960	2541484	276504	277986	SPBC15D4.15	SPAC23D3.12	pho2	SPAC23D3.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922417313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782073	2539960	2540825	276504	277343	SPBC15D4.15	SPBC428.08c	pho2	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.003052886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782074	2539960	2542513	276504	278971	SPBC15D4.15	SPAC1952.05	pho2	gcn5	-	kat2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037438951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782075	2539960	2540647	276504	277172	SPBC15D4.15	SPBC18H10.07	pho2	SPBC18H10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.187213785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782076	2539960	2542123	276504	278599	SPBC15D4.15	SPAC18G6.15	pho2	mal3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.30833219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782077	2539960	2541889	276504	278379	SPBC15D4.15	SPAC2F7.03c	pho2	pom1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.920275573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782078	2539960	2542032	276504	278514	SPBC15D4.15	SPAC23C11.04c	pho2	pnk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.81763239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782079	2539960	2542007	276504	278490	SPBC15D4.15	SPAC20H4.07	pho2	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.813518046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782080	2539960	2543381	276504	279803	SPBC15D4.15	SPAC630.09c	pho2	mug58	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.672370993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782081	2539960	2542597	276504	279051	SPBC15D4.15	SPAP8A3.07c	pho2	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.189175771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782082	2539960	2541614	276504	278111	SPBC15D4.15	SPAC29A4.20	pho2	elp3	-	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.090554035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782083	2539960	2538848	276504	275429	SPBC15D4.15	SPCC613.12c	pho2	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.099868797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782084	2539960	2541713	276504	278208	SPBC15D4.15	SPAC3A12.12	pho2	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.457212481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782085	2539960	2541743	276504	278237	SPBC15D4.15	SPAC22H10.13	pho2	zym1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868754975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782086	2539960	2542386	276504	278850	SPBC15D4.15	SPAC1805.01c	pho2	ppk6	-	SPAPJ736.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.556086304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782087	2539960	2543372	276504	279794	SPBC15D4.15	SPAPB1A10.09	pho2	ase1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990218232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782088	2540653	2540686	277178	277211	SPBC215.07c	SPBC21D10.10	SPBC215.07c	bdc1	pdp2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.454036518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782089	2540653	2542555	277178	279012	SPBC215.07c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC215.07c	SPAC1952.06c	pdp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.414023788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782090	2540653	2542318	277178	278784	SPBC215.07c	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC215.07c	cph1	pdp2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700792105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782091	2540653	2542189	277178	278664	SPBC215.07c	SPAC17A5.09c	SPBC215.07c	glc9	pdp2	SPAC17A5.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.502600487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782092	2540653	2542311	277178	278777	SPBC215.07c	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC215.07c	dad1	pdp2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.671301088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782093	2540653	2540497	277178	277025	SPBC215.07c	SPBC27.04	SPBC215.07c	uds1	pdp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.11761322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782094	2540653	2542861	277178	279307	SPBC215.07c	SPAC13G7.13c	SPBC215.07c	msa1	pdp2	SPAC6C3.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.900718071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782095	2540653	2542710	277178	279163	SPBC215.07c	SPAC750.08c	SPBC215.07c	SPAC750.08c	pdp2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.38927084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782096	2540653	2542549	277178	279006	SPBC215.07c	SPAC19A8.11c	SPBC215.07c	SPAC19A8.11c	pdp2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.765899692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782097	2540653	2542519	277178	278977	SPBC215.07c	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC215.07c	scs7	pdp2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.62748137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782098	2540653	2541746	277178	278240	SPBC215.07c	SPAC20G4.04c	SPBC215.07c	hus1	pdp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.122951963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782099	2540653	2543567	277178	279983	SPBC215.07c	SPAC890.03	SPBC215.07c	ppk16	pdp2	mug92	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.508092424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782100	2540653	2539239	277178	275809	SPBC215.07c	SPCC1020.10	SPBC215.07c	oca2	pdp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.259695635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782101	2540653	2541531	277178	278031	SPBC215.07c	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC215.07c	fft3	pdp2	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.59596836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782102	2540653	2542094	277178	278571	SPBC215.07c	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC215.07c	rcd1	pdp2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.247085669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782103	2540458	2540064	276986	276602	SPBC29A10.14	SPBC1718.02	rec8	hop1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322102309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782104	2540458	2543387	276986	279809	SPBC29A10.14	SPAPB1E7.02c	rec8	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509334544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782105	2540458	2540320	276986	276850	SPBC29A10.14	SPBC3D6.04c	rec8	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569994219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782106	2539023	2542895	275596	279339	SPCC594.05c	SPAC13G6.10c	spf1	asl1	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.076253028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782107	2539023	2541257	275596	277771	SPCC594.05c	SPBP23A10.14c	spf1	ell1	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510610937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782108	2539023	2538961	275596	275535	SPCC594.05c	SPCC285.14	spf1	trs130	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.008594469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782109	2539023	2540105	275596	276642	SPCC594.05c	SPBC106.04	spf1	ada1	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.323266042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782110	2539023	2543637	275596	280051	SPCC594.05c	SPAC3H8.02	spf1	csr102	spp1	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.811037313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782111	2539023	2542812	275596	279259	SPCC594.05c	SPAC6F6.01	spf1	cch1	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448147305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782112	2539023	2543064	275596	279497	SPCC594.05c	SPAC3G6.01	spf1	hrp3	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.267820396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782113	2539023	2540524	275596	277052	SPCC594.05c	SPBC21B10.08c	spf1	SPBC21B10.08c	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452508359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782114	2539023	2542378	275596	278842	SPCC594.05c	SPAC1805.04	spf1	nup132	spp1	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317561878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782115	2539023	2542237	275596	278709	SPCC594.05c	SPAC19E9.02	spf1	fin1	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706898435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782116	2539023	2539930	275596	276474	SPCC594.05c	SPBC1198.11c	spf1	reb1	spp1	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.916615188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782117	2539023	2540694	275596	277218	SPCC594.05c	SPBC19C7.10	spf1	bqt4	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.318517007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782118	2539023	2543434	275596	279854	SPCC594.05c	SPAC8F11.02c	spf1	dph3	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9180402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782119	2539023	2540686	275596	277211	SPCC594.05c	SPBC21D10.10	spf1	bdc1	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.955621961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782120	2539023	2542040	275596	278521	SPCC594.05c	SPAC212.01c	spf1	SPAC212.01c	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450187892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782121	2539023	2540999	275596	277515	SPCC594.05c	SPBC4B4.04	spf1	SPBC4B4.04	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.679083538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782122	2539023	2540975	275596	277491	SPCC594.05c	SPBC354.12	spf1	gpd3	spp1	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.212470131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782123	2539023	2541012	275596	277527	SPCC594.05c	SPBC3H7.12	spf1	rav2	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.705608063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782124	2539023	2539463	275596	276026	SPCC594.05c	SPCC550.11	spf1	SPCC550.11	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634177733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782125	2539023	2543681	275596	280095	SPCC594.05c	SPAC9.02c	spf1	SPAC9.02c	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380180655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782126	2539023	2538801	275596	275382	SPCC594.05c	SPCC285.13c	spf1	nup60	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.21492789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782127	2539023	2541026	275596	277541	SPCC594.05c	SPBC337.09	spf1	erg28	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.693181224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782128	2539023	2542555	275596	279012	SPCC594.05c	SPAC1952.06c	spf1	SPAC1952.06c	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.752314141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782129	2539023	2540220	275596	276753	SPCC594.05c	SPBC337.03	spf1	rhn1	spp1	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.770280882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782130	2539023	2539797	275596	276347	SPCC594.05c	SPBC16G5.14c	spf1	rps3	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77972797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782131	2539023	2540425	275596	276953	SPCC594.05c	SPBC27.06c	spf1	mgr2	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.443924068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782132	2539023	2542318	275596	278784	SPCC594.05c	SPAC16C9.05	spf1	cph1	spp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093030081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782133	2539023	2541527	275596	278027	SPCC594.05c	SPAC31A2.09c	spf1	apm4	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.191712037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782134	2539023	2542969	275596	279409	SPCC594.05c	SPAC4G8.10	spf1	gos1	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.448222139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782135	2539023	2543686	275596	280100	SPCC594.05c	SPAC3C7.14c	spf1	obr1	spp1	apt1|uhp1|p25	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.243569451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782136	2539023	2541923	275596	278411	SPCC594.05c	SPAC23C4.09c	spf1	SPAC23C4.09c	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440473574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782137	2539023	2543563	275596	279979	SPCC594.05c	SPAC664.02c	spf1	arp8	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.708208516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782138	2539023	2539352	275596	275918	SPCC594.05c	SPCC188.07	spf1	ccq1	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.536646976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782139	2539023	2538906	275596	275483	SPCC594.05c	SPCC1259.03	spf1	rpa12	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.863202829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782140	2539023	2539310	275596	275877	SPCC594.05c	SPCC285.17	spf1	spp27	spp1	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.300991422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782141	2539023	2539467	275596	276030	SPCC594.05c	SPCC417.07c	spf1	mto1	spp1	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.488740227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782142	2539023	2540892	275596	277408	SPCC594.05c	SPBC530.01	spf1	gyp1	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712499453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782143	2539023	2541776	275596	278270	SPCC594.05c	SPAC23H3.05c	spf1	swd1	spp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.344554801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782144	2539023	2543144	275596	279576	SPCC594.05c	SPAC3F10.05c	spf1	mug113	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.74337397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782145	2539023	2541160	275596	277675	SPCC594.05c	SPBC725.09c	spf1	hob3	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.83084704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782146	2539023	2543412	275596	279834	SPCC594.05c	SPAC637.07	spf1	moe1	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.086913723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782147	2539023	2540673	275596	277198	SPCC594.05c	SPBC1D7.03	spf1	mug80	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.745439665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782148	2539023	2541889	275596	278379	SPCC594.05c	SPAC2F7.03c	spf1	pom1	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.440731223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782149	2539023	2539219	275596	275789	SPCC594.05c	SPCC1795.01c	spf1	mad3	spp1	SPCC895.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578793457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782150	2539023	2542469	275596	278930	SPCC594.05c	SPAC19A8.04	spf1	erg5	spp1	cyp61	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.896487258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782151	2539023	2539999	275596	276543	SPCC594.05c	SPBC1734.15	spf1	rsc4	spp1	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.444228438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782152	2539023	2541496	275596	277998	SPCC594.05c	SPAC23D3.09	spf1	arp42	spp1	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.798043603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782153	2539023	2543667	275596	280081	SPCC594.05c	SPAC4H3.02c	spf1	swc3	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.824136648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782154	2539023	2541166	275596	277681	SPCC594.05c	SPBC725.15	spf1	ura5	spp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.822373904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782155	2539023	2539857	275596	276404	SPCC594.05c	SPBC1604.20c	spf1	tea2	spp1	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3302694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782156	2539023	2542651	275596	279105	SPCC594.05c	SPAC24C9.12c	spf1	SPAC24C9.12c	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378259195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782157	2539023	2539233	275596	275803	SPCC594.05c	SPCC16A11.03c	spf1	SPCC16A11.03c	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582906898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782158	2539023	2543250	275596	279678	SPCC594.05c	SPAC3G9.15c	spf1	fcf2	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.60371126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782159	2539023	2543396	275596	279818	SPCC594.05c	SPAC4D7.11	spf1	dsc4	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383143941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782160	2539023	2539667	275596	276222	SPCC594.05c	SPBC13G1.08c	spf1	ash2	spp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873776835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782161	2539023	2539000	275596	275574	SPCC594.05c	SPCC1450.06c	spf1	grx3	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63499098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782162	2539023	2542946	275596	279386	SPCC594.05c	SPAC6F12.03c	spf1	fsv1	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.977258799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782163	2539023	2540077	275596	276615	SPCC594.05c	SPBC17D11.04c	spf1	nto1	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.484286346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782164	2539023	2542254	275596	278724	SPCC594.05c	SPAC30D11.04c	spf1	nup124	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.635903606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782165	2539023	2541900	275596	278390	SPCC594.05c	SPAC23H4.17c	spf1	srb10	spp1	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.347948422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782166	2539023	2540327	275596	276857	SPCC594.05c	SPBC31F10.07	spf1	lsb5	spp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.851875921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782167	2539023	2542549	275596	279006	SPCC594.05c	SPAC19A8.11c	spf1	SPAC19A8.11c	spp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985653533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782168	2539023	2542439	275596	278901	SPCC594.05c	SPAC17A5.08	spf1	erp2	spp1	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.627836107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782169	2539023	2543443	275596	279863	SPCC594.05c	SPAC3H1.12c	spf1	snt2	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.623190508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782170	2539023	2541536	275596	278036	SPCC594.05c	SPAC1071.02	spf1	mms19	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.077038089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782171	2539023	2541053	275596	277568	SPCC594.05c	SPBC56F2.10c	spf1	alg5	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513415862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782172	2539023	2540967	275596	277483	SPCC594.05c	SPBC36B7.08c	spf1	SPBC36B7.08c	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.103176567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782173	2539023	2540184	275596	276717	SPCC594.05c	SPBC106.12c	spf1	SPBC106.12c	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708661461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782174	2539023	2540533	275596	277061	SPCC594.05c	SPBC29A10.16c	spf1	SPBC29A10.16c	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.078490119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782175	2539023	2540357	275596	276886	SPCC594.05c	SPBC2F12.05c	spf1	SPBC2F12.05c	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256278655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782176	2539023	2541488	275596	277990	SPCC594.05c	SPAC227.17c	spf1	SPAC227.17c	spp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.921884198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782177	2539023	2543139	275596	279571	SPCC594.05c	SPAC12G12.03	spf1	cip2	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.128113839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782178	2539023	2541713	275596	278208	SPCC594.05c	SPAC3A12.12	spf1	atp11	spp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.845630684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782179	2539023	2540821	275596	277339	SPCC594.05c	SPBC800.03	spf1	clr3	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.764044882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782180	2539023	2539763	275596	276314	SPCC594.05c	SPBC1861.05	spf1	SPBC1861.05	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.766545798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782181	2539023	2542170	275596	278645	SPCC594.05c	SPAC17G8.13c	spf1	mst2	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.156584737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782182	2539023	2539706	275596	276259	SPCC594.05c	SPBC16G5.13	spf1	ptf2	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.314429722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782183	2539023	2542806	275596	279254	SPCC594.05c	SPAC1610.01	spf1	saf5	spp1	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.198789627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782184	2539023	2540619	275596	277145	SPCC594.05c	SPBC25H2.15	spf1	SPBC25H2.15	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.816777746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782185	2539023	2541909	275596	278399	SPCC594.05c	SPAC227.01c	spf1	erd1	spp1	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453164048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782186	2539023	2540498	275596	277026	SPCC594.05c	SPBC27.02c	spf1	ask1	spp1	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.023499031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782187	2539023	2539925	275596	276469	SPCC594.05c	SPBC16H5.13	spf1	SPBC16H5.13	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.091400496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782188	2539023	2539600	275596	276158	SPCC594.05c	SPCP1E11.03	spf1	mug170	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.248987353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782189	2539023	2542940	275596	279381	SPCC594.05c	SPAC31A2.12	spf1	SPAC31A2.12	spp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864788612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782190	2539023	2538756	275596	275339	SPCC594.05c	SPCC1795.10c	spf1	SPCC1795.10c	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.260410029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782191	2539023	2541531	275596	278031	SPCC594.05c	SPAC25A8.01c	spf1	fft3	spp1	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.785973704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782192	2539023	2540346	275596	276875	SPCC594.05c	SPBC2F12.03c	spf1	ebs1	spp1	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.65077975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782193	2539023	2542418	275596	278881	SPCC594.05c	SPAC1805.07c	spf1	dad2	spp1	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.545277645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782194	2539023	2540677	275596	277202	SPCC594.05c	SPBC21B10.03c	spf1	ath1	spp1	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.325213971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782195	2539023	2542826	275596	279273	SPCC594.05c	SPAC13G6.09	spf1	SPAC13G6.09	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.745733821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782196	2539023	2539668	275596	276223	SPCC594.05c	SPBC11B10.10c	spf1	pht1	spp1	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575229951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782197	2539023	2540516	275596	277044	SPCC594.05c	SPBC21C3.01c	spf1	vps13a	spp1	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.935017247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782198	2539023	2539928	275596	276472	SPCC594.05c	SPBC1604.08c	spf1	imp1	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.069480956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782199	2539023	2543044	275596	279479	SPCC594.05c	SPAC3C7.12	spf1	tip1	spp1	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.469362546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782200	2539023	2542386	275596	278850	SPCC594.05c	SPAC1805.01c	spf1	ppk6	spp1	SPAPJ736.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.836168847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782201	2539023	2539205	275596	275775	SPCC594.05c	SPCC4B3.15	spf1	mid1	spp1	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.550603284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782202	2539023	2543056	275596	279490	SPCC594.05c	SPAC3A11.04	spf1	SPAC3A11.04	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.195319901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782203	2539023	2540551	275596	277078	SPCC594.05c	SPBC23E6.01c	spf1	cxr1	spp1	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.623118936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782204	2539023	2542244	275596	278714	SPCC594.05c	SPAC19G12.13c	spf1	poz1	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.263402275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782205	2539023	2539700	275596	276253	SPCC594.05c	SPBC1685.15c	spf1	klp6	spp1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.501239333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782206	2539023	2541062	275596	277577	SPCC594.05c	SPBC660.11	spf1	tcg1	spp1	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.178018817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782207	2539023	2541875	275596	278365	SPCC594.05c	SPAC22F3.06c	spf1	lon1	spp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443808389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782208	2542386	2543432	278850	279852	SPAC1805.01c	SPAC4G8.05	ppk6	ppk14	SPAPJ736.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.986131205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782209	2542386	2541208	278850	277722	SPAC1805.01c	SPBC887.04c	ppk6	lub1	SPAPJ736.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.296961578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782210	2542386	2542189	278850	278664	SPAC1805.01c	SPAC17A5.09c	ppk6	glc9	SPAPJ736.02c	SPAC17A5.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383283937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782211	2542386	2539960	278850	276504	SPAC1805.01c	SPBC15D4.15	ppk6	pho2	SPAPJ736.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.556086304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782212	2542386	2539023	278850	275596	SPAC1805.01c	SPCC594.05c	ppk6	spf1	SPAPJ736.02c	spp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.836168847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782213	2542386	2542268	278850	278737	SPAC1805.01c	SPAC17A5.07c	ppk6	ulp2	SPAPJ736.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.57233174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782214	2542386	2542177	278850	278652	SPAC1805.01c	SPAC17H9.08	ppk6	SPAC17H9.08	SPAPJ736.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.009899356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782215	2542386	2538770	278850	275353	SPAC1805.01c	SPCC1753.02c	ppk6	git3	SPAPJ736.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.053872771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782216	2542386	2539667	278850	276222	SPAC1805.01c	SPBC13G1.08c	ppk6	ash2	SPAPJ736.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.83641333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782217	2542386	2539974	278850	276518	SPAC1805.01c	SPBC32H8.07	ppk6	git5	SPAPJ736.02c	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.39208959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782218	2542386	2541746	278850	278240	SPAC1805.01c	SPAC20G4.04c	ppk6	hus1	SPAPJ736.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.745115213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782219	2542386	2538762	278850	275345	SPAC1805.01c	SPCC306.04c	ppk6	set1	SPAPJ736.02c	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.740574478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782220	2542386	2539920	278850	276464	SPAC1805.01c	SPBC119.08	ppk6	pmk1	SPAPJ736.02c	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.929570014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782221	2543592	2543064	280007	279497	SPAC4F10.18	SPAC3G6.01	nup37	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.816942368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782222	2543592	2542378	280007	278842	SPAC4F10.18	SPAC1805.04	nup37	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.848218586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782223	2543592	2541117	280007	277632	SPAC4F10.18	SPBC646.13	nup37	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.625070291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782224	2543592	2540220	280007	276753	SPAC4F10.18	SPBC337.03	nup37	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.905427547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782225	2543592	2540929	280007	277445	SPAC4F10.18	SPBC354.03	nup37	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.123784161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782226	2543592	2542268	280007	278737	SPAC4F10.18	SPAC17A5.07c	nup37	ulp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.128196521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782227	2543592	2541900	280007	278390	SPAC4F10.18	SPAC23H4.17c	nup37	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.40161654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782228	2543592	2539424	280007	275989	SPAC4F10.18	SPCC622.19	nup37	jmj4	-	mug149	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.895541535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782229	2543592	2542453	280007	278914	SPAC4F10.18	SPAC186.01	nup37	pfl9	-	SPAC186.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.199517244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782230	2543592	2542516	280007	278974	SPAC4F10.18	SPAC2F7.04	nup37	pmc2	-	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.556732806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782231	2543592	2542883	280007	279328	SPAC4F10.18	SPAC1486.04c	nup37	alm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852735482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782232	2543592	2540516	280007	277044	SPAC4F10.18	SPBC21C3.01c	nup37	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32325465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782233	2543592	2538840	280007	275421	SPAC4F10.18	SPCC736.07c	nup37	SPCC736.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.803238323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782234	2543592	2542059	280007	278537	SPAC4F10.18	SPAC328.06	nup37	ubp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.55016739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782235	2543592	3361410	280007	280486	SPAC4F10.18	SPAC1527.01	nup37	mok11	-	SPAC23D3.15	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.749933269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782236	2543592	2543472	280007	279892	SPAC4F10.18	SPAC959.04c	nup37	omh6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989072845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782237	2540198	2540131	276731	276668	SPBC1709.04c	SPBC1778.05c	cyp3	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.866689697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782238	2540198	2539263	276731	275833	SPBC1709.04c	SPCC895.09c	cyp3	ucp12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450911376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782239	2540198	2542555	276731	279012	SPBC1709.04c	SPAC1952.06c	cyp3	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.844282529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782240	2540198	2539845	276731	276393	SPBC1709.04c	SPBC12C2.02c	cyp3	ste20	-	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388348464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782241	2540198	2540647	276731	277172	SPBC1709.04c	SPBC18H10.07	cyp3	SPBC18H10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.122100664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782242	2540198	2542829	276731	279276	SPBC1709.04c	SPAC13D6.02c	cyp3	byr3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810583593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782243	2540198	3361520	276731	280596	SPBC1709.04c	SPAC1610.02c	cyp3	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147981616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782244	2540198	2543304	276731	279728	SPBC1709.04c	SPAC6B12.12	cyp3	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195939356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782245	2540198	2542418	276731	278881	SPBC1709.04c	SPAC1805.07c	cyp3	dad2	-	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.897151455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782246	2540198	2542222	276731	278695	SPBC1709.04c	SPAC31G5.18c	cyp3	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.451080396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782247	2540198	2539205	276731	275775	SPBC1709.04c	SPCC4B3.15	cyp3	mid1	-	dmf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.802878497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782248	2540209	2543643	276742	280057	SPBC1604.10	SPAC3G9.07c	srb7	hos2	med21	hda1|phd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148998858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782249	2540209	2539354	276742	275920	SPBC1604.10	SPCC4F11.03c	srb7	SPCC4F11.03c	med21	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.687090261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782250	2543419	2538801	279841	275382	SPAPB24D3.02c	SPCC285.13c	SPAPB24D3.02c	nup60	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.800337647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782251	2543419	2540425	279841	276953	SPAPB24D3.02c	SPBC27.06c	SPAPB24D3.02c	mgr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815763966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782252	2543419	2542189	279841	278664	SPAPB24D3.02c	SPAC17A5.09c	SPAPB24D3.02c	glc9	-	SPAC17A5.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381306443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782253	2543419	2540326	279841	276856	SPAPB24D3.02c	SPBC2G5.06c	SPAPB24D3.02c	hmt2	-	cad1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091298551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782254	2543419	2543244	279841	279672	SPAPB24D3.02c	SPAC6B12.06c	SPAPB24D3.02c	rrg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.131491169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782255	2543419	2539925	279841	276469	SPAPB24D3.02c	SPBC16H5.13	SPAPB24D3.02c	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194776378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782256	2543419	2541806	279841	278297	SPAPB24D3.02c	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAPB24D3.02c	prz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.845066693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782257	2541365	2542747	277876	279197	SPBP8B7.23	SPAC15A10.06	rnf10	SPAC15A10.06	SPBP8B7.23	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571892205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782258	2541365	2542701	277876	279154	SPBP8B7.23	SPAC26H5.05	rnf10	mga2	SPBP8B7.23	SPAC26H5.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809466147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782259	2541365	2538922	277876	275499	SPBP8B7.23	SPCC16C4.10	rnf10	SPCC16C4.10	SPBP8B7.23	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.971862864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782260	2541365	2542886	277876	279331	SPBP8B7.23	SPAC1486.01	rnf10	SPAC1486.01	SPBP8B7.23	sod2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.139535217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782261	2541365	2541297	277876	277809	SPBP8B7.23	SPBC9B6.07	rnf10	nop52	SPBP8B7.23	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.191212929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782262	2542550	2542895	279007	279339	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC13G6.10c	SPAC1B3.02c	asl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.99954143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782263	2542550	2538977	279007	275551	SPAC1B3.02c	SPCC1020.06c	SPAC1B3.02c	tal1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322140244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782264	2542550	2541818	279007	278309	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC11G7.02	SPAC1B3.02c	pub1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.658595253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782265	2542550	2543064	279007	279497	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC1B3.02c	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.127853413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782266	2542550	2540410	279007	276938	SPAC1B3.02c	SPBC2D10.04	SPAC1B3.02c	SPBC2D10.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091125043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782267	2542550	2541361	279007	277872	SPAC1B3.02c	SPBP8B7.10c	SPAC1B3.02c	utp16	-	SPBP8B7.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.907158608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782268	2542550	2539332	279007	275898	SPAC1B3.02c	SPCPB1C11.01	SPAC1B3.02c	amt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924707301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782269	2542550	2543658	279007	280072	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC644.09	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC644.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.956385658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782270	2542550	2539434	279007	275997	SPAC1B3.02c	SPCC757.09c	SPAC1B3.02c	rnc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.897293315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782271	2542550	2541669	279007	278165	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC22G7.07c	SPAC1B3.02c	ime4	-	SPAC22G7.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.801950575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782272	2542550	2540676	279007	277201	SPAC1B3.02c	SPBC3E7.11c	SPAC1B3.02c	SPBC3E7.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.884245103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782273	2542550	2542220	279007	278694	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.120242913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782274	2542550	2541522	279007	278023	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC23E2.01	SPAC1B3.02c	fep1	-	gaf2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044731304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782275	2542550	2542300	279007	278767	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC1687.22c	SPAC1B3.02c	puf3	-	SPAC222.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.524317801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782276	2542550	3361543	279007	280619	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC9.13c	SPAC1B3.02c	cwf16	-	SPAPJ735.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.563835471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782277	2542550	2542311	279007	278777	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC1B3.02c	dad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.971023309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782278	2542550	2543598	279007	280013	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC4G9.14	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC4G9.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.879443325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782279	2542550	2542990	279007	279428	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC11D3.16c	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC11D3.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982555423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782280	2542550	2542464	279007	278925	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC1A6.09c	SPAC1B3.02c	lag1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.524392323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782281	2542550	2543283	279007	279709	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC6C3.04	SPAC1B3.02c	cit1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.915227407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782282	2542550	2540265	279007	276796	SPAC1B3.02c	SPBC3E7.12c	SPAC1B3.02c	cfh4	-	chr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.273302679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782283	2542550	2541542	279007	278042	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC4G9.02	SPAC1B3.02c	rnh201	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.024454888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782284	2542550	2541900	279007	278390	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC1B3.02c	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.655956041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782285	2542550	2539936	279007	276480	SPAC1B3.02c	SPBC1685.05	SPAC1B3.02c	SPBC1685.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.804177473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782286	2542550	2542875	279007	279320	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC13G7.02c	SPAC1B3.02c	ssa1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.39063035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782287	2542550	2542516	279007	278974	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC2F7.04	SPAC1B3.02c	pmc2	-	med1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.80252217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782288	2542550	2542881	279007	279326	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC13F5.03c	SPAC1B3.02c	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.62930386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782289	2542550	2539925	279007	276469	SPAC1B3.02c	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC1B3.02c	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.838292187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782290	2542550	2543304	279007	279728	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC1B3.02c	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455171589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782291	2542550	2541531	279007	278031	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1B3.02c	fft3	-	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.524747976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782292	2542550	2539928	279007	276472	SPAC1B3.02c	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC1B3.02c	imp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984672002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782293	2542550	2543046	279007	279481	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC3C7.10	SPAC1B3.02c	pex13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.822396012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782294	2542550	2542716	279007	279169	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC25H1.07	SPAC1B3.02c	emc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.785660409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782295	2542550	2538920	279007	275497	SPAC1B3.02c	SPCC1840.05c	SPAC1B3.02c	SPCC1840.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.880349461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782296	2542550	2541576	279007	278073	SPAC1B3.02c	SPBC1348.02	SPAC1B3.02c	SPBC1348.02	-	SPAC1348.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.822789175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782297	2539406	2541488	275971	277990	SPCC4G3.07c	SPAC227.17c	phf1	SPAC227.17c	saf50|swp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.565780139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782298	2541853	2540060	278344	276598	SPAC2F3.11	SPBC106.01	SPAC2F3.11	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984623858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782299	2541853	2539549	278344	276110	SPAC2F3.11	SPCC576.01c	SPAC2F3.11	xan1	-	SPCC576.01c|SPCPB1C11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569275027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782300	2541853	2540929	278344	277445	SPAC2F3.11	SPBC354.03	SPAC2F3.11	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.195911781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782301	2541853	2542318	278344	278784	SPAC2F3.11	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC2F3.11	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.705343451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782302	2541853	2541527	278344	278027	SPAC2F3.11	SPAC31A2.09c	SPAC2F3.11	apm4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773424874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782303	2541853	2542277	278344	278746	SPAC2F3.11	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC2F3.11	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.560124109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782304	2541853	2540663	278344	277188	SPAC2F3.11	SPBC56F2.06	SPAC2F3.11	mug147	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319456447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782305	2541853	2542082	278344	278559	SPAC2F3.11	SPAC29B12.10c	SPAC2F3.11	pgt1	-	opt1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.187068483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782306	2541853	2538906	278344	275483	SPAC2F3.11	SPCC1259.03	SPAC2F3.11	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.4644268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782307	2541853	2538821	278344	275402	SPAC2F3.11	SPCC584.01c	SPAC2F3.11	SPCC584.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.98627348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782308	2541853	2540673	278344	277198	SPAC2F3.11	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC2F3.11	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980304172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782309	2541853	2539213	278344	275783	SPAC2F3.11	SPCC285.10c	SPAC2F3.11	SPCC285.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.790265197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782310	2541853	2542875	278344	279320	SPAC2F3.11	SPAC13G7.02c	SPAC2F3.11	ssa1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568446334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782311	2541853	2540001	278344	276545	SPAC2F3.11	SPBC1289.13c	SPAC2F3.11	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635403374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782312	2541853	2539137	278344	275709	SPAC2F3.11	SPCC1682.08c	SPAC2F3.11	mcp2	-	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439895347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782313	2541853	2540498	278344	277026	SPAC2F3.11	SPBC27.02c	SPAC2F3.11	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.439111479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782314	2541853	2543304	278344	279728	SPAC2F3.11	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC2F3.11	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.975128858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782315	2541853	2543192	278344	279621	SPAC2F3.11	SPAC343.18	SPAC2F3.11	rfp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820257479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782316	2541853	2542418	278344	278881	SPAC2F3.11	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC2F3.11	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.972180567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782317	2541853	2543387	278344	279809	SPAC2F3.11	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC2F3.11	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.42869216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782318	2541853	2543372	278344	279794	SPAC2F3.11	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC2F3.11	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.528663525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782319	2541853	2540938	278344	277454	SPAC2F3.11	SPBC365.14c	SPAC2F3.11	uge1	-	gal10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508592439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782320	2541853	2539292	278344	275860	SPAC2F3.11	SPCC4G3.02	SPAC2F3.11	aph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504706495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782321	2542036	2540060	278518	276598	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC106.01	hrq1	mph1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.594088608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782322	2542036	2540885	278518	277402	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC660.14	hrq1	mik1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.410920502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782323	2542036	2543634	278518	280048	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC3H8.04	hrq1	SPAC3H8.04	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.251077245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782324	2542036	2541512	278518	278013	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC11E3.08c	hrq1	nse6	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.115759588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782325	2542036	2540913	278518	277429	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC56F2.08c	hrq1	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.112285693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782326	2542036	2542066	278518	278543	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC227.05	hrq1	SPAC227.05	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.714226143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782327	2542036	2542127	278518	278603	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC1952.12c	hrq1	csn71	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	csn7|csn7a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.253198289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782328	2542036	2542378	278518	278842	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC1805.04	hrq1	nup132	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.252318084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782329	2542036	2538896	278518	275474	SPAC23A1.19c	SPCC584.11c	hrq1	SPCC584.11c	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450789098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782330	2542036	2541135	278518	277650	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC839.03c	hrq1	SPBC839.03c	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.971823344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782331	2542036	2538857	278518	275437	SPAC23A1.19c	SPCC1442.05c	hrq1	SPCC1442.05c	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809798892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782332	2542036	2541051	278518	277566	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC3E7.08c	hrq1	rad13	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.706313552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782333	2542036	2540161	278518	276696	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC13E7.03c	hrq1	SPBC13E7.03c	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.382514571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782334	2542036	2542502	278518	278960	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC139.06	hrq1	hat1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.632505076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782335	2542036	2543164	278518	279595	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC3G6.06c	hrq1	rad2	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.894784147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782336	2542036	2541584	278518	278081	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAP32A8.02	hrq1	SPAP32A8.02	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09978397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782337	2542036	2540664	278518	277189	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC215.02	hrq1	bob1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.900445787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782338	2542036	2543320	278518	279744	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAPJ695.01c	hrq1	SPAPJ695.01c	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.333942171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782339	2542036	2539210	278518	275780	SPAC23A1.19c	SPCC2H8.05c	hrq1	dbl1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	SPCC2H8.05c|SPCC63.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.42786453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782340	2542036	2541208	278518	277722	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC887.04c	hrq1	lub1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.574743287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782341	2542036	2538775	278518	275357	SPAC23A1.19c	SPCC23B6.05c	hrq1	ssb3	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	rpa3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.22339774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782342	2542036	2542696	278518	279149	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC29B12.03	hrq1	spd1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.122818325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782343	2542036	2538801	278518	275382	SPAC23A1.19c	SPCC285.13c	hrq1	nup60	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.672054811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782344	2542036	2540945	278518	277461	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC342.06c	hrq1	rtt109	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.939793579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782345	2542036	2539434	278518	275997	SPAC23A1.19c	SPCC757.09c	hrq1	rnc1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.348501474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782346	2542036	2543048	278518	279483	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC3F10.02c	hrq1	trk1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	sptrk	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.458694197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782347	2542036	2540993	278518	277509	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC342.01c	hrq1	alg6	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	SPBC3F6.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09325983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782348	2542036	2540425	278518	276953	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC27.06c	hrq1	mgr2	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.81700717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782349	2542036	2542318	278518	278784	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC16C9.05	hrq1	cph1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.217245262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782350	2542036	2542277	278518	278746	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC17A5.02c	hrq1	dbr1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.914111267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782351	2542036	2539721	278518	276274	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC146.04	hrq1	SPBC146.04	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.329377078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782352	2542036	2543685	278518	280099	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC3C7.03c	hrq1	rad55	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.963491339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782353	2542036	2540595	278518	277121	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC21C3.02c	hrq1	dep1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.772353228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782354	2542036	2541643	278518	278139	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC14C4.13	hrq1	rad17	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.165473117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782355	2542036	2541580	278518	278077	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC1687.05	hrq1	pli1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.750195814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782356	2542036	2539175	278518	275746	SPAC23A1.19c	SPCC16C4.01	hrq1	sif2	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	SPCC5E4.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516063705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782357	2542036	2541105	278518	277620	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC685.02	hrq1	exo5	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.070751585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782358	2542036	2539244	278518	275814	SPAC23A1.19c	SPCC1672.06c	hrq1	asp1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.903683985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782359	2542036	2543563	278518	279979	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC664.02c	hrq1	arp8	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.916202012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782360	2542036	2540825	278518	277343	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC428.08c	hrq1	clr4	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.044665297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782361	2542036	2542558	278518	279014	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC1952.07	hrq1	rad1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.709435015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782362	2542036	2541021	278518	277536	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC3B8.10c	hrq1	nem1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256838207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782363	2542036	3361391	278518	280467	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC13G6.01c	hrq1	rad8	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	SPAC5H10.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.345854933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782364	2542036	2542568	278518	279024	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC1952.02	hrq1	tma23	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989224728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782365	2542036	2542239	278518	278711	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC18G6.02c	hrq1	chp1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.54889074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782366	2542036	2542268	278518	278737	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC17A5.07c	hrq1	ulp2	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.080345807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782367	2542036	2539467	278518	276030	SPAC23A1.19c	SPCC417.07c	hrq1	mto1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.84013219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782368	2542036	2539388	278518	275953	SPAC23A1.19c	SPCC24B10.12	hrq1	cgi121	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.081854337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782369	2542036	2543514	278518	279932	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC4D7.03	hrq1	pop2	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.432073038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782370	2542036	2542596	278518	279050	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC1B3.17	hrq1	clr2	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.498630357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782371	2542036	2540797	278518	277316	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC18H10.11c	hrq1	ppr2	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.988986525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782372	2542036	2541801	278518	278292	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC2F7.08c	hrq1	snf5	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.797222772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782373	2542036	2539473	278518	276036	SPAC23A1.19c	SPCP25A2.02c	hrq1	rhp26	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.815327874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782374	2542036	2540348	278518	276877	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC29A10.05	hrq1	exo1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.93987786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782375	2542036	2540338	278518	276867	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC2G2.13c	hrq1	dcd1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.540891294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782376	2542036	2541892	278518	278382	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAP27G11.02	hrq1	SPAP27G11.02	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92261535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782377	2542036	2538706	278518	275290	SPAC23A1.19c	SPCC338.08	hrq1	ctp1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.56240784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782378	2542036	2540352	278518	276881	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC215.03c	hrq1	csn1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392232195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782379	2542036	2540396	278518	276924	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC31F10.12	hrq1	tma20	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	SPBC31F10.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.839428612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782380	2542036	2540673	278518	277198	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC1D7.03	hrq1	mug80	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983155051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782381	2542036	2540150	278518	276687	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC16E9.14c	hrq1	zrg17	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.325336963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782382	2542036	2539999	278518	276543	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC1734.15	hrq1	rsc4	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.618443053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782383	2542036	2541388	278518	277899	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBP8B7.30c	hrq1	thi5	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.459001538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782384	2542036	2541166	278518	277681	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC725.15	hrq1	ura5	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.941686205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782385	2542036	2542925	278518	279366	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC11E3.04c	hrq1	ubc13	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	spu13|sst5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.638002859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782386	2542036	2538994	278518	275568	SPAC23A1.19c	SPCC553.01c	hrq1	dbl2	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330646393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782387	2542036	2540086	278518	276624	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC16H5.12c	hrq1	SPBC16H5.12c	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.806978379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782388	2542036	2542014	278518	278497	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC20H4.04	hrq1	fml2	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	mfh2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.742403623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782389	2542036	2542007	278518	278490	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC20H4.07	hrq1	rad57	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.266073804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782390	2542036	2543244	278518	279672	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC6B12.06c	hrq1	rrg9	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.973394015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782391	2542036	2540394	278518	276922	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC2D10.09	hrq1	snr1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	SPBC2D10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980531291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782392	2542036	2543080	278518	279513	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC3A11.10c	hrq1	SPAC3A11.10c	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455375627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782393	2542036	2542056	278518	278535	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC6G9.14	hrq1	SPAC6G9.14	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780283059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782394	2542036	2543561	278518	279977	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC922.04	hrq1	SPAC922.04	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982524934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782395	2542036	2543517	278518	279935	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC3G9.05	hrq1	spa2	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.345559383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782396	2542036	3361470	278518	280546	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC3G9.01	hrq1	nsk1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.397512535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782397	2542036	2541266	278518	277780	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBP16F5.05c	hrq1	yar1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	SPBP16F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.020272614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782398	2542036	2540229	278518	276761	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC31F10.15c	hrq1	atp15	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.877950888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782399	2542036	2542255	278518	278725	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC57A7.08	hrq1	pzh1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.816748061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782400	2542036	2541378	278518	277889	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBP8B7.21	hrq1	ubp3	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.024950456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782401	2542036	2539527	278518	276089	SPAC23A1.19c	SPCC338.16	hrq1	pof3	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.960881384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782402	2542036	2538848	278518	275429	SPAC23A1.19c	SPCC613.12c	hrq1	raf1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.351606918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782403	2542036	2542869	278518	279314	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC140.02	hrq1	gar2	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984099517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782404	2542036	2539538	278518	276100	SPAC23A1.19c	SPCC364.06	hrq1	nap1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.301260912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782405	2542036	2539686	278518	276241	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC1734.06	hrq1	rhp18	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.672220603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782406	2542036	2542327	278518	278793	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC16C9.06c	hrq1	upf1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.403768249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782407	2542036	2543670	278518	280084	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAPB1E7.06c	hrq1	eme1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	mms4|slx2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.263866813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782408	2542036	2540498	278518	277026	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC27.02c	hrq1	ask1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.345323729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782409	2542036	2540115	278518	276652	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC1778.02	hrq1	rap1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.519428755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782410	2542036	2541531	278518	278031	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC25A8.01c	hrq1	fft3	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.851581454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782411	2542036	2540346	278518	276875	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC2F12.03c	hrq1	ebs1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.878761079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782412	2542036	2540829	278518	277347	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC800.09	hrq1	sum2	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.896778804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782413	2542036	2540523	278518	277051	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC29A10.10c	hrq1	dbl8	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	SPBC29A10.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.861883653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782414	2542036	2540325	278518	276855	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC21B10.10	hrq1	rps402	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	rps4-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044853617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782415	2542036	2542418	278518	278881	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC1805.07c	hrq1	dad2	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.088743744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782416	2542036	2539514	278518	276076	SPAC23A1.19c	SPCC663.14c	hrq1	trp663	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	SPCC663.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985373394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782417	2542036	2539772	278518	276323	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC1734.05c	hrq1	spf31	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980444807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782418	2542036	2539668	278518	276223	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC11B10.10c	hrq1	pht1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.047151066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782419	2542036	2540992	278518	277508	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC342.05	hrq1	crb2	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	rhp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.37003796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782420	2542036	2540927	278518	277443	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC365.06	hrq1	pmt3	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	smt3|ubl2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.226455842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782421	2542036	2543633	278518	280047	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC3H8.05c	hrq1	mms1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.835865941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782422	2542036	2539702	278518	276255	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC1604.12	hrq1	SPBC1604.12	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.754985228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782423	2542036	3361117	278518	280193	SPAC23A1.19c	SPCC663.17	hrq1	wtf15	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45433895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782424	2542036	2539375	278518	275941	SPAC23A1.19c	SPCC4G3.11	hrq1	mug154	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.588545137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782425	2542036	2540551	278518	277078	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC23E6.01c	hrq1	cxr1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.941173774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782426	2542036	2540146	278518	276683	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC17A3.06	hrq1	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	pi040	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.034994082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782427	2542036	2538840	278518	275421	SPAC23A1.19c	SPCC736.07c	hrq1	SPCC736.07c	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924900614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782428	2542036	2542059	278518	278537	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC328.06	hrq1	ubp2	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.892074358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782429	2542036	2541806	278518	278297	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC4G8.13c	hrq1	prz1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.799536584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782430	2542036	2543387	278518	279809	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAPB1E7.02c	hrq1	mcl1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.328875444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782431	2542036	2543327	278518	279750	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC1D4.06c	hrq1	csk1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.691280191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782432	2542036	2538854	278518	275435	SPAC23A1.19c	SPCP1E11.05c	hrq1	are2	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379636495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782433	2542036	2540309	278518	276839	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC21B10.13c	hrq1	yox1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.123856669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782434	2542036	2541272	278518	277786	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC947.03c	hrq1	naa38	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	mak31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.201899702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782435	2542036	2542094	278518	278571	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC29B12.06c	hrq1	rcd1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.101942555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782436	2542036	2540649	278518	277174	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC19F8.08	hrq1	rps401	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929512777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782437	2542036	2540736	278518	277259	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC19F8.02	hrq1	SPBC19F8.02	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.742955474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782438	2541672	2538939	278168	275514	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC1672.04c	lsk1	SPCC1672.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874793498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782439	2541672	2542207	278168	278682	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC17H9.10c	lsk1	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.312449004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782440	2541672	2539050	278168	275623	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC11E10.08	lsk1	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64170085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782441	2541672	2539841	278168	276389	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC17D1.05	lsk1	SPBC17D1.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.249795199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782442	2541672	2542518	278168	278976	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC1B3.16c	lsk1	vht1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092093877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782443	2541672	2540653	278168	277178	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC215.07c	lsk1	SPBC215.07c	-	pdp2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811381303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782444	2541672	2541552	278168	278051	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC1142.08	lsk1	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201483076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782445	2541672	2540524	278168	277052	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC21B10.08c	lsk1	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985563916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782446	2541672	2539930	278168	276474	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC1198.11c	lsk1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.609482781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782447	2541672	3361561	278168	280637	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC11E3.01c	lsk1	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.074489373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782448	2541672	2541345	278168	277856	SPAC2F3.15	SPBP35G2.07	lsk1	ilv1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933158841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782449	2541672	2541633	278168	278129	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC664.01c	lsk1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.318034918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782450	2541672	2541235	278168	277749	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC8D2.12c	lsk1	SPBC8D2.12c	-	pI053	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98218952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782451	2541672	2539420	278168	275985	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC970.07c	lsk1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.87477859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782452	2541672	2541208	278168	277722	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC887.04c	lsk1	lub1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.456612702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782453	2541672	2542677	278168	279130	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC26F1.10c	lsk1	pyp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.024605206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782454	2541672	2539970	278168	276514	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC1773.01	lsk1	far8	-	SPBC1773.01|csc3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638070367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782455	2541672	2541498	278168	278000	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC227.10	lsk1	SPAC227.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392759545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782456	2541672	2540425	278168	276953	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC27.06c	lsk1	mgr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5648576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782457	2541672	2543426	278168	279846	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC631.02	lsk1	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.011318353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782458	2541672	2539100	278168	275672	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC330.12c	lsk1	sdh3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.514382648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782459	2541672	2542845	278168	279291	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC824.04	lsk1	SPAC824.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.030378294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782460	2541672	2540825	278168	277343	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC428.08c	lsk1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.072182464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782461	2541672	2543020	278168	279456	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC10F6.13c	lsk1	SPAC10F6.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704555296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782462	2541672	2541801	278168	278292	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC2F7.08c	lsk1	snf5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19596491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782463	2541672	2540192	278168	276725	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC1215.01	lsk1	shy1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.407472002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782464	2541672	2541038	278168	277553	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC29A10.01	lsk1	ccr1	-	SPBC365.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387367665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782465	2541672	2542971	278168	279410	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC105.02c	lsk1	SPAC105.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153353886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782466	2541672	2541889	278168	278379	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC2F7.03c	lsk1	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.56957213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782467	2541672	2542168	278168	278643	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC17A5.16	lsk1	ftp105	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32691236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782468	2541672	2541876	278168	278366	SPAC2F3.15	SPAP27G11.11c	lsk1	SPAP27G11.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.748815067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782469	2541672	2541496	278168	277998	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC23D3.09	lsk1	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.199698513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782470	2541672	2539603	278168	276161	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC1289.06c	lsk1	ppr8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934325313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782471	2541672	2542193	278168	278668	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC9G1.11c	lsk1	spn4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.506863559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782472	2541672	2540086	278168	276624	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC16H5.12c	lsk1	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807598415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782473	2541672	2540326	278168	276856	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC2G5.06c	lsk1	hmt2	-	cad1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035365799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782474	2541672	2542032	278168	278514	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC23C11.04c	lsk1	pnk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.676956659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782475	2541672	2542976	278168	279414	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC9E9.09c	lsk1	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.89003072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782476	2541672	2540961	278168	277477	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC36B7.03	lsk1	sec63	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.146236853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782477	2541672	2540394	278168	276922	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC2D10.09	lsk1	snr1	-	SPBC2D10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.202732752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782478	2541672	2539958	278168	276502	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC1718.07c	lsk1	zfs1	-	moc4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.41039582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782479	2541672	2540318	278168	276848	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC30B4.04c	lsk1	sol1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.26018085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782480	2541672	2543080	278168	279513	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC3A11.10c	lsk1	SPAC3A11.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092028074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782481	2541672	2540335	278168	276865	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC30B4.03c	lsk1	adn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.748836572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782482	2541672	2542439	278168	278901	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC17A5.08	lsk1	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852167446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782483	2541672	2543443	278168	279863	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC3H1.12c	lsk1	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575112828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782484	2541672	2539368	278168	275934	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC16A11.07	lsk1	coq10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.51394168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782485	2541672	2541708	278168	278203	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC31A2.02	lsk1	trm112	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875923302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782486	2541672	2542597	278168	279051	SPAC2F3.15	SPAP8A3.07c	lsk1	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.273900172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782487	2541672	2539711	278168	276264	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC1683.09c	lsk1	frp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.718109029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782488	2541672	2542255	278168	278725	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC57A7.08	lsk1	pzh1	-	phz1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.100155582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782489	2541672	2539812	278168	276362	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC1347.02	lsk1	fkbp39	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09218856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782490	2541672	2541337	278168	277848	SPAC2F3.15	SPBP35G2.13c	lsk1	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.400299448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782491	2541672	2542781	278168	279230	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC57A10.12c	lsk1	ura3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.179828658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782492	2541672	2540930	278168	277446	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC354.10	lsk1	def1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.533990026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782493	2541672	2541742	278168	278236	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC22H10.09	lsk1	SPAC22H10.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927334974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782494	2541672	2538848	278168	275429	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC613.12c	lsk1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.902640595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782495	2541672	2541713	278168	278208	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC3A12.12	lsk1	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.93103832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782496	2541672	2542283	278168	278751	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC27F1.08	lsk1	pdt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579957735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782497	2541672	2540442	278168	276970	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC25B2.04c	lsk1	mtg1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048421936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782498	2541672	2541370	278168	277881	SPAC2F3.15	SPBP8B7.07c	lsk1	set6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.271329762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782499	2541672	2539555	278168	276116	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC4B3.08	lsk1	lsg1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992736075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782500	2541672	2540061	278168	276599	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC119.12	lsk1	rud3	-	SPBC119.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.560056861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782501	2541672	2540531	278168	277059	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC23E6.08	lsk1	sat1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.561813479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782502	2541672	2538756	278168	275339	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC1795.10c	lsk1	SPCC1795.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448693068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782503	2541672	2541531	278168	278031	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC25A8.01c	lsk1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.071727243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782504	2541672	2541114	278168	277629	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC582.09	lsk1	pex11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98911809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782505	2541672	2539668	278168	276223	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC11B10.10c	lsk1	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.085660772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782506	2541672	2539928	278168	276472	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC1604.08c	lsk1	imp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510851451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782507	2541672	2542386	278168	278850	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC1805.01c	lsk1	ppk6	-	SPAPJ736.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.67101278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782508	2541672	2539169	278168	275740	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC1235.11	lsk1	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.768195948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782509	2541672	2543327	278168	279750	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC1D4.06c	lsk1	csk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046597703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782510	2541672	2538854	278168	275435	SPAC2F3.15	SPCP1E11.05c	lsk1	are2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.340030227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782511	2541672	2538869	278168	275449	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC777.02	lsk1	SPCC777.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.408561039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782512	2541672	2543372	278168	279794	SPAC2F3.15	SPAPB1A10.09	lsk1	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.253995946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782513	2541672	2543448	278168	279868	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC3H5.07	lsk1	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980657336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782514	2541672	2542094	278168	278571	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC29B12.06c	lsk1	rcd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819055217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782515	2541672	2540736	278168	277259	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC19F8.02	lsk1	SPBC19F8.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813342713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782516	2541590	2542671	278087	279124	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC824.09c	cdr2	SPAC824.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575404632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782517	2541590	2538993	278087	275567	SPAC57A10.02	SPCC162.12	cdr2	tco89	-	SPCC1753.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574390757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782518	2541590	2542502	278087	278960	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC139.06	cdr2	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570924405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782519	2541590	2541633	278087	278129	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC664.01c	cdr2	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.502530069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782520	2541590	2543432	278087	279852	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC4G8.05	cdr2	ppk14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.523528534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782521	2541590	2542205	278087	278680	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC1A6.05c	cdr2	ptl3	-	SPAC1A6.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.185410752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782522	2541590	2540686	278087	277211	SPAC57A10.02	SPBC21D10.10	cdr2	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.625450665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782523	2541590	2542848	278087	279294	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC9G1.03c	cdr2	rpl3001	-	rpl30|rpl30-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453990462	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782524	2541590	2543453	278087	279873	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC3G9.03	cdr2	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.182446952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782525	2541590	2541026	278087	277541	SPAC57A10.02	SPBC337.09	cdr2	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.462790722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782526	2541590	2541669	278087	278165	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC22G7.07c	cdr2	ime4	-	SPAC22G7.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.815064834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782527	2541590	2540727	278087	277250	SPAC57A10.02	SPBC1921.03c	cdr2	mex67	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.695558351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782528	2541590	2540425	278087	276953	SPAC57A10.02	SPBC27.06c	cdr2	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.736438075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782529	2541590	2541866	278087	278356	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC23H3.11c	cdr2	SPAC23H3.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.629791389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782530	2541590	2539244	278087	275814	SPAC57A10.02	SPCC1672.06c	cdr2	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.99833238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782531	2541590	2543551	278087	279968	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC4G8.06c	cdr2	trm12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706935869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782532	2541590	2543563	278087	279979	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC664.02c	cdr2	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.312568039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782533	2541590	2542981	278087	279419	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC824.02	cdr2	bst1	-	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447161501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782534	2541590	2541021	278087	277536	SPAC57A10.02	SPBC3B8.10c	cdr2	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.704185234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782535	2541590	2540892	278087	277408	SPAC57A10.02	SPBC530.01	cdr2	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505428149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782536	2541590	2543412	278087	279834	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC637.07	cdr2	moe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.252844827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782537	2541590	2543208	278087	279637	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC328.04	cdr2	SPAC328.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.055357511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782538	2541590	2543244	278087	279672	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC6B12.06c	cdr2	rrg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.398818185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782539	2541590	2542431	278087	278893	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC1A6.01c	cdr2	SPAC1A6.01c	-	SPAC23C4.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.633224923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782540	2541590	2542867	278087	279312	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC343.16	cdr2	lys2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442043395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782541	2541590	2541927	278087	278415	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC222.12c	cdr2	atp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637050616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782542	2541590	2539812	278087	276362	SPAC57A10.02	SPBC1347.02	cdr2	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.722711564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782543	2541590	2539519	278087	276081	SPAC57A10.02	SPCC364.05	cdr2	vps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.911331612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782544	2541590	3361526	278087	280602	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC664.15	cdr2	caf4	-	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390092103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782545	2541590	2538848	278087	275429	SPAC57A10.02	SPCC613.12c	cdr2	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576225565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782546	2541590	2543267	278087	279695	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC1002.12c	cdr2	SPAC1002.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.57530671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782547	2541590	2542541	278087	278998	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC1B3.03c	cdr2	wis2	-	cyp5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.311295145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782548	2541590	2543420	278087	279842	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC3H1.04c	cdr2	mdm31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381378635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782549	2541590	2542386	278087	278850	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC1805.01c	cdr2	ppk6	-	SPAPJ736.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641112853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782550	2541590	2543525	278087	279943	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC4A8.14	cdr2	SPAC4A8.14	-	prs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.455945968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782551	2541590	2538840	278087	275421	SPAC57A10.02	SPCC736.07c	cdr2	SPCC736.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781943739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782552	2541590	2543337	278087	279760	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC959.08	cdr2	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.461535355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782553	2541590	2541806	278087	278297	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC4G8.13c	cdr2	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.628982264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782554	2541590	2543327	278087	279750	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC1D4.06c	cdr2	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.692973083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782555	2541590	2543087	278087	279520	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC30C2.04	cdr2	SPAC30C2.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44115301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782556	2541590	2543151	278087	279583	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC343.06c	cdr2	SPAC343.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392260744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782557	2541590	2542280	278087	278748	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC1A6.06c	cdr2	meu31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.31812098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782558	2541590	2540309	278087	276839	SPAC57A10.02	SPBC21B10.13c	cdr2	yox1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.552862154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782559	2538898	2542895	275476	279339	SPCC4B3.16	SPAC13G6.10c	tip41	asl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.503353043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782560	2538898	2540131	275476	276668	SPCC4B3.16	SPBC1778.05c	tip41	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.622182651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782561	2538898	2541633	275476	278129	SPCC4B3.16	SPAC664.01c	tip41	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.754892936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782562	2538898	2541771	275476	278265	SPCC4B3.16	SPAC23H3.06	tip41	apl6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.327130082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782563	2538898	2539420	275476	275985	SPCC4B3.16	SPCC970.07c	tip41	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.055398074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782564	2538898	2542689	275476	279142	SPCC4B3.16	SPAC29B12.04	tip41	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.913914126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782565	2538898	2542724	275476	279175	SPCC4B3.16	SPAC767.01c	tip41	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778883602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782566	2538898	2539334	275476	275900	SPCC4B3.16	SPCC285.05	tip41	SPCC285.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387078414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782567	2538898	2542698	275476	279151	SPCC4B3.16	SPAC26H5.09c	tip41	SPAC26H5.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148331137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782568	2538898	2542845	275476	279291	SPCC4B3.16	SPAC824.04	tip41	SPAC824.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870125634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782569	2538898	2540825	275476	277343	SPCC4B3.16	SPBC428.08c	tip41	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.959457273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782570	2538898	2539310	275476	275877	SPCC4B3.16	SPCC285.17	tip41	spp27	-	uaf30	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.619635848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782571	2538898	2542707	275476	279160	SPCC4B3.16	SPAC25G10.03	tip41	zip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.640935064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782572	2538898	2542652	275476	279106	SPCC4B3.16	SPAC1687.15	tip41	gsk3	-	skp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.335384999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782573	2538898	2540338	275476	276867	SPCC4B3.16	SPBC2G2.13c	tip41	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639219252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782574	2538898	2542420	275476	278883	SPCC4B3.16	SPAC19D5.03	tip41	cid1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455352499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782575	2538898	2542857	275476	279303	SPCC4B3.16	SPAC144.06	tip41	apl5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.501446945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782576	2538898	2539000	275476	275574	SPCC4B3.16	SPCC1450.06c	tip41	grx3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098333211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782577	2538898	2542946	275476	279386	SPCC4B3.16	SPAC6F12.03c	tip41	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647468977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782578	2538898	2543357	275476	279779	SPCC4B3.16	SPAC688.12c	tip41	SPAC688.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.202481857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782579	2538898	2541009	275476	277524	SPCC4B3.16	SPBC428.04	tip41	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637282928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782580	2538898	2540342	275476	276871	SPCC4B3.16	SPBC2G2.01c	tip41	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572420305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782581	2538898	2538848	275476	275429	SPCC4B3.16	SPCC613.12c	tip41	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779807266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782582	2538898	2541017	275476	277532	SPCC4B3.16	SPBC36.07	tip41	elp1	-	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982241473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782583	2538898	2540001	275476	276545	SPCC4B3.16	SPBC1289.13c	tip41	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321884754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782584	2538898	2542759	275476	279209	SPCC4B3.16	SPAC9G1.07	tip41	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776447789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782585	2538898	2540531	275476	277059	SPCC4B3.16	SPBC23E6.08	tip41	sat1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.143154016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782586	2538898	2539169	275476	275740	SPCC4B3.16	SPCC1235.11	tip41	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.051954016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782587	2538898	2541869	275476	278359	SPCC4B3.16	SPAC22F3.13	tip41	tsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453203444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782588	2538898	2541478	275476	277980	SPCC4B3.16	SPAC2F7.17	tip41	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570735991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782589	2538898	2541062	275476	277577	SPCC4B3.16	SPBC660.11	tip41	tcg1	-	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510280333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782590	2538898	2540734	275476	277257	SPCC4B3.16	SPBC19G7.09	tip41	ulp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574787892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782591	2539205	2542518	275775	278976	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC1B3.16c	mid1	vht1	dmf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.52432037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782592	2539205	2540913	275775	277429	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC56F2.08c	mid1	SPBC56F2.08c	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.369894875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782593	2539205	2540235	275775	276767	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC336.13c	mid1	SPBC336.13c	dmf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.448035918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782594	2539205	2542812	275775	279259	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC6F6.01	mid1	cch1	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.496532587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782595	2539205	2543414	275775	279836	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC630.10	mid1	SPAC630.10	dmf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152456268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782596	2539205	2543064	275775	279497	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC3G6.01	mid1	hrp3	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.213604398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782597	2539205	2540524	275775	277052	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC21B10.08c	mid1	SPBC21B10.08c	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.564785753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782598	2539205	2542293	275775	278761	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC17G8.14c	mid1	pck1	dmf1	SPAC22H10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.481442117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782599	2539205	2540745	275775	277268	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC21C3.18	mid1	spo4	dmf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877188199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782600	2539205	2540198	275775	276731	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC1709.04c	mid1	cyp3	dmf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.802878497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782601	2539205	2541135	275775	277650	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC839.03c	mid1	SPBC839.03c	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51301703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782602	2539205	2539930	275775	276474	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC1198.11c	mid1	reb1	dmf1	SPBC660.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.605723243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782603	2539205	3361561	275775	280637	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC11E3.01c	mid1	swr1	dmf1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.494484561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782604	2539205	2542953	275775	279393	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC1006.06	mid1	rgf2	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324645381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782605	2539205	2539939	275775	276483	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC11G11.01	mid1	fis1	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.452794266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782606	2539205	2540099	275775	276637	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC16H5.11c	mid1	skb1	dmf1	rmt5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330621136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782607	2539205	2542650	275775	279104	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC2C4.10c	mid1	csc4	dmf1	SPAC2C4.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.772950177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782608	2539205	2539944	275775	276488	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC1198.06c	mid1	SPBC1198.06c	dmf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.086095365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782609	2539205	2540686	275775	277211	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC21D10.10	mid1	bdc1	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.277748672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782610	2539205	2541584	275775	278081	SPCC4B3.15	SPAP32A8.02	mid1	SPAP32A8.02	dmf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.463411736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782611	2539205	2540999	275775	277515	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC4B4.04	mid1	SPBC4B4.04	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.05274379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782612	2539205	2540560	275775	277087	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC2D10.14c	mid1	myo51	dmf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.113793505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782613	2539205	2542677	275775	279130	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC26F1.10c	mid1	pyp1	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.895774157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782614	2539205	2541013	275775	277528	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC3H7.13	mid1	far10	dmf1	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.647826778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782615	2539205	2540979	275775	277495	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC3H7.10	mid1	elp6	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.340754754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782616	2539205	2538847	275775	275428	SPCC4B3.15	SPCC594.06c	mid1	SPCC594.06c	dmf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.941710247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782617	2539205	2542669	275775	279122	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC29B12.08	mid1	clr5	dmf1	SPAC29B12.08	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09852181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782618	2539205	2538801	275775	275382	SPCC4B3.15	SPCC285.13c	mid1	nup60	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.343438793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782619	2539205	2540306	275775	276836	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC2G5.02c	mid1	ckb2	dmf1	SPBC2G5.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.658104912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782620	2539205	2540220	275775	276753	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC337.03	mid1	rhn1	dmf1	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.76788791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782621	2539205	3361381	275775	280457	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC12G12.01c	mid1	SPAC12G12.01c	dmf1	SPAC630.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.526633649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782622	2539205	2540929	275775	277445	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC354.03	mid1	swd3	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.18177431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782623	2539205	2541119	275775	277634	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC651.11c	mid1	apm3	dmf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.103449247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782624	2539205	2542012	275775	278495	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC23C11.02c	mid1	rps23	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572709339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782625	2539205	2541761	275775	278255	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC7D4.12c	mid1	SPAC7D4.12c	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.039738354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782626	2539205	2542135	275775	278611	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC13A11.04c	mid1	ubp8	dmf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.617432033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782627	2539205	2542318	275775	278784	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC16C9.05	mid1	cph1	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.681251078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782628	2539205	2540295	275775	276826	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC3B8.05	mid1	SPBC3B8.05	dmf1	dph1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.859409318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782629	2539205	2542277	275775	278746	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC17A5.02c	mid1	dbr1	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.630757075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782630	2539205	2543609	275775	280023	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC630.05	mid1	gyp7	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.583061175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782631	2539205	2540467	275775	276995	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC2G2.07c	mid1	mug178	dmf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.713885908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782632	2539205	2542220	275775	278694	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC1A6.03c	mid1	SPAC1A6.03c	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.626271141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782633	2539205	2539244	275775	275814	SPCC4B3.15	SPCC1672.06c	mid1	asp1	dmf1	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508301329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782634	2539205	2538698	275775	275283	SPCC4B3.15	SPCC1442.02	mid1	SPCC1442.02	dmf1	SPCC1450.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.316892406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782635	2539205	2538866	275775	275446	SPCC4B3.15	SPCC1620.12c	mid1	SPCC1620.12c	dmf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.712290096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782636	2539205	2542558	275775	279014	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC1952.07	mid1	rad1	dmf1	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.472336506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782637	2539205	2542665	275775	279118	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC10F6.08c	mid1	nht10	dmf1	nht1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.690040217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782638	2539205	2539023	275775	275596	SPCC4B3.15	SPCC594.05c	mid1	spf1	dmf1	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.550603284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782639	2539205	3361461	275775	280537	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC11H11.01	mid1	sst6	dmf1	cps23	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.125930805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782640	2539205	2542679	275775	279132	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC12B10.07	mid1	acp1	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.409400116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782641	2539205	2540631	275775	277157	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC25B2.10	mid1	SPBC25B2.10	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.206663227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782642	2539205	2540894	275775	277410	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC530.04	mid1	mod5	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.707753498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782643	2539205	2541776	275775	278270	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC23H3.05c	mid1	swd1	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.644962624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782644	2539205	2539845	275775	276393	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC12C2.02c	mid1	ste20	dmf1	ste16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.132957005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782645	2539205	2543445	275775	279865	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC4F10.13c	mid1	mpd2	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.405946244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782646	2539205	2540647	275775	277172	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC18H10.07	mid1	SPBC18H10.07	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.268769707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782647	2539205	3361491	275775	280567	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC1805.08	mid1	dlc1	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.578675756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782648	2539205	2542123	275775	278599	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC18G6.15	mid1	mal3	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.392860903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782649	2539205	2540352	275775	276881	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC215.03c	mid1	csn1	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.61505546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782650	2539205	2539733	275775	276285	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC16E9.12c	mid1	pab2	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.874986586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782651	2539205	2540673	275775	277198	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC1D7.03	mid1	mug80	dmf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.756533413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782652	2539205	2542420	275775	278883	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC19D5.03	mid1	cid1	dmf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984759409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782653	2539205	2542469	275775	278930	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC19A8.04	mid1	erg5	dmf1	cyp61	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.033078686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782654	2539205	2539999	275775	276543	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC1734.15	mid1	rsc4	dmf1	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.837999605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782655	2539205	2543667	275775	280081	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC4H3.02c	mid1	swc3	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.786875032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782656	2539205	2542925	275775	279366	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC11E3.04c	mid1	ubc13	dmf1	spu13|sst5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.853430464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782657	2539205	2543101	275775	279533	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC323.03c	mid1	SPAC323.03c	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330637689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782658	2539205	2541710	275775	278205	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC343.11c	mid1	msc1	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.587072185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782659	2539205	2539667	275775	276222	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC13G1.08c	mid1	ash2	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.376851111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782660	2539205	2542126	275775	278602	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC1B3.05	mid1	not3	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.555946838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782661	2539205	2542032	275775	278514	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC23C11.04c	mid1	pnk1	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.627934097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782662	2539205	2542740	275775	279190	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC9G1.06c	mid1	cyk3	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.216177757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782663	2539205	2539958	275775	276502	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC1718.07c	mid1	zfs1	dmf1	moc4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.281887162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782664	2539205	2542254	275775	278724	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC30D11.04c	mid1	nup124	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645212692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782665	2539205	2543301	275775	279726	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC977.17	mid1	SPAC977.17	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.954354542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782666	2539205	2542519	275775	278977	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC19G12.08	mid1	scs7	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9862122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782667	2539205	2539953	275775	276497	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC1709.11c	mid1	png2	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.900239473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782668	2539205	2543576	275775	279991	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC4A8.05c	mid1	myp2	dmf1	myo3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.422286187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782669	2539205	2542008	275775	278491	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC2G11.07c	mid1	ptc3	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637575402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782670	2539205	2541708	275775	278203	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC31A2.02	mid1	trm112	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.960812955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782671	2539205	2542597	275775	279051	SPCC4B3.15	SPAP8A3.07c	mid1	SPAP8A3.07c	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.046794865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782672	2539205	2543517	275775	279935	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC3G9.05	mid1	spa2	dmf1	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.141072777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782673	2539205	2541283	275775	277796	SPCC4B3.15	SPBP8B7.02	mid1	rng9	dmf1	SPBP8B7.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.921914453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782674	2539205	2543390	275775	279812	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC631.01c	mid1	acp2	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.263154184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782675	2539205	2540533	275775	277061	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC29A10.16c	mid1	SPBC29A10.16c	dmf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.824667399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782676	2539205	2541614	275775	278111	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC29A4.20	mid1	elp3	dmf1	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.679259179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782677	2539205	2539421	275775	275986	SPCC4B3.15	SPCC794.11c	mid1	ent3	dmf1	SPCC794.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.920282543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782678	2539205	2542255	275775	278725	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC57A7.08	mid1	pzh1	dmf1	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.865237059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782679	2539205	2542829	275775	279276	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC13D6.02c	mid1	byr3	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570472056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782680	2539205	2541337	275775	277848	SPCC4B3.15	SPBP35G2.13c	mid1	swc2	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.377105771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782681	2539205	2542329	275775	278795	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC9G1.10c	mid1	SPAC9G1.10c	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.584374378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782682	2539205	2542973	275775	279412	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC10F6.04	mid1	SPAC10F6.04	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.947749551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782683	2539205	2541017	275775	277532	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC36.07	mid1	elp1	dmf1	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.610685775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782684	2539205	2541713	275775	278208	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC3A12.12	mid1	atp11	dmf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.433597244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782685	2539205	2542170	275775	278645	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC17G8.13c	mid1	mst2	dmf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.464309092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782686	2539205	2542283	275775	278751	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC27F1.08	mid1	pdt1	dmf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.996103828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782687	2539205	2539160	275775	275732	SPCC4B3.15	SPCC18.17c	mid1	SPCC18.17c	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.059791819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782688	2539205	2541156	275775	277671	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC685.07c	mid1	rpl2701	dmf1	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767617753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782689	2539205	2542619	275775	279073	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC6G10.02c	mid1	tea3	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.698938456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782690	2539205	2543619	275775	280033	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC4F10.04	mid1	ypa1	dmf1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.802766826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782691	2539205	2542327	275775	278793	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC16C9.06c	mid1	upf1	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319083351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782692	2539205	2543106	275775	279538	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC3A11.13	mid1	SPAC3A11.13	dmf1	SPAC3H5.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.354245629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782693	2539205	2543567	275775	279983	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC890.03	mid1	ppk16	dmf1	mug92	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640609275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782694	2539205	2540498	275775	277026	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC27.02c	mid1	ask1	dmf1	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.631731548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782695	2539205	2542883	275775	279328	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC1486.04c	mid1	alm1	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.319614928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782696	2539205	2542915	275775	279357	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC6C3.06c	mid1	SPAC6C3.06c	dmf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.81828441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782697	2539205	2540800	275775	277319	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC409.20c	mid1	psh3	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.680812977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782698	2539205	2543304	275775	279728	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC6B12.12	mid1	tom70	dmf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.851588325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782699	2539205	2542541	275775	278998	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC1B3.03c	mid1	wis2	dmf1	cyp5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514075631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782700	2539205	2539246	275775	275816	SPCC4B3.15	SPCC18.13	mid1	SPCC18.13	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.369590955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782701	2539205	2541358	275775	277869	SPCC4B3.15	SPBP4H10.16c	mid1	SPBP4H10.16c	dmf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.927464181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782702	2539205	2539707	275775	276260	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC17F3.01c	mid1	rga5	dmf1	SPBC557.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.714051914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782703	2539205	2542458	275775	278919	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC30.02c	mid1	SPAC30.02c	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.903538062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782704	2539205	2541531	275775	278031	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC25A8.01c	mid1	fft3	dmf1	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.337119214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782705	2539205	2540829	275775	277347	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC800.09	mid1	sum2	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773182162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782706	2539205	2542906	275775	279350	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC13D6.03c	mid1	trm9	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.364704252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782707	2539205	2539729	275775	276281	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC11B10.07c	mid1	ivn1	dmf1	pi004|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.129541353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782708	2539205	2539668	275775	276223	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC11B10.10c	mid1	pht1	dmf1	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442154304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782709	2539205	2540936	275775	277452	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC800.05c	mid1	atb2	dmf1	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.650461038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782710	2539205	2539928	275775	276472	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC1604.08c	mid1	imp1	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.448523091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782711	2539205	2543044	275775	279479	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC3C7.12	mid1	tip1	dmf1	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.99160667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782712	2539205	2541757	275775	278251	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC2F7.10	mid1	akr1	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386551311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782713	2539205	2539702	275775	276255	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC1604.12	mid1	SPBC1604.12	dmf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.142746713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782714	2539205	2543516	275775	279934	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC4F10.11	mid1	spn1	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.965278519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782715	2539205	3361511	275775	280587	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC23C4.08	mid1	rho3	dmf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045507045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782716	2539205	2540896	275775	277412	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC19C2.13c	mid1	ctu2	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.889347756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782717	2539205	2540270	275775	276801	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC2G2.02	mid1	syj1	dmf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.444359125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782718	2539205	2540146	275775	276683	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC17A3.06	mid1	SPBC17A3.06	dmf1	pi040	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.886060261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782719	2539205	2539189	275775	275760	SPCC4B3.15	SPCC1682.16	mid1	rpt4	dmf1	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.32842579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782720	2539205	2542716	275775	279169	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC25H1.07	mid1	emc1	dmf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814663596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782721	2539205	2543384	275775	279806	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC637.06	mid1	gmh5	dmf1	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.919939255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782722	2539205	2541627	275775	278123	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC1F5.08c	mid1	yam8	dmf1	ehs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.305723658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782723	2539205	2542109	275775	278585	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC1687.16c	mid1	erg31	dmf1	erg3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.00605183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782724	2539205	2541778	275775	278271	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC23G3.05c	mid1	SPAC23G3.05c	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.975029887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782725	2539205	2540314	275775	276844	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC2G5.03	mid1	ctu1	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.011875476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782726	2539205	2540558	275775	277085	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC2D10.17	mid1	clr1	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.360784368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782727	2539205	2541869	275775	278359	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC22F3.13	mid1	tsc1	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.96574725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782728	2539205	2541867	275775	278357	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC22E12.14c	mid1	sck2	dmf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.080908341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782729	2539205	2543372	275775	279794	SPCC4B3.15	SPAPB1A10.09	mid1	ase1	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.474696946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782730	2539205	2543090	275775	279523	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC1348.01	mid1	SPBC1348.01	dmf1	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.566918851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782731	2539205	2542656	275775	279110	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC2E1P3.05c	mid1	SPAC2E1P3.05c	dmf1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.328158222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782732	2539205	2543100	275775	279532	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC12B10.14c	mid1	tea5	dmf1	ppk2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.330996007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782733	2539205	2542094	275775	278571	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC29B12.06c	mid1	rcd1	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.528263648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782734	2539205	2543646	275775	280060	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC821.07c	mid1	moc3	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.812513863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782735	2539205	3361512	275775	280588	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC3C7.01c	mid1	sac12	dmf1	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.138078298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782736	2539205	2538940	275775	275515	SPCC4B3.15	SPCC1620.07c	mid1	lnp1	dmf1	SPCC1620.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.906451053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782737	2539205	2543616	275775	280030	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC4A8.09c	mid1	cwf21	dmf1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.682473981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782738	2539205	2542571	275775	279027	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC589.02c	mid1	med13	dmf1	spTrap240|srb9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81018557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782739	2539503	2542598	276066	279052	SPCC4B3.14	SPAC6G10.08	cwf20	idp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778885689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782740	2539503	2539510	276066	276072	SPCC4B3.14	SPCC4G3.04c	cwf20	coq5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511956269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782741	2539237	2541818	275807	278309	SPCC24B10.13	SPAC11G7.02	skb5	pub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.91981083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782742	2539237	2542293	275807	278761	SPCC24B10.13	SPAC17G8.14c	skb5	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.101337566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782743	2539237	2540999	275807	277515	SPCC24B10.13	SPBC4B4.04	skb5	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.457143633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782744	2539237	2542189	275807	278664	SPCC24B10.13	SPAC17A5.09c	skb5	glc9	-	SPAC17A5.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.313829391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782745	2539237	2543396	275807	279818	SPCC24B10.13	SPAC4D7.11	skb5	dsc4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451241489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782746	2539237	2540019	275807	276563	SPCC24B10.13	SPBC1685.01	skb5	pmp1	-	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.074091845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782747	2539237	2543619	275807	280033	SPCC24B10.13	SPAC4F10.04	skb5	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.752659981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782748	2539237	2541175	275807	277689	SPCC24B10.13	SPBC839.13c	skb5	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928082099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782749	2539237	2543304	275807	279728	SPCC24B10.13	SPAC6B12.12	skb5	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.014835165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782750	2539237	2538840	275807	275421	SPCC24B10.13	SPCC736.07c	skb5	SPCC736.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38328215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782751	2539237	2543384	275807	279806	SPCC24B10.13	SPAC637.06	skb5	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.71610717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782752	2539237	2540558	275807	277085	SPCC24B10.13	SPBC2D10.17	skb5	clr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.352178403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782753	2539237	2543472	275807	279892	SPCC24B10.13	SPAC959.04c	skb5	omh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.824714389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782754	2539388	2542598	275953	279052	SPCC24B10.12	SPAC6G10.08	cgi121	idp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929425394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782755	2539388	2541512	275953	278013	SPCC24B10.12	SPAC11E3.08c	cgi121	nse6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.8754831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782756	2539388	2540913	275953	277429	SPCC24B10.12	SPBC56F2.08c	cgi121	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.131502972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782757	2539388	2542671	275953	279124	SPCC24B10.12	SPAC824.09c	cgi121	SPAC824.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582662935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782758	2539388	2541117	275953	277632	SPCC24B10.12	SPBC646.13	cgi121	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.344839418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782759	2539388	2541051	275953	277566	SPCC24B10.12	SPBC3E7.08c	cgi121	rad13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.56029282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782760	2539388	2541633	275953	278129	SPCC24B10.12	SPAC664.01c	cgi121	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.740200434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782761	2539388	2543434	275953	279854	SPCC24B10.12	SPAC8F11.02c	cgi121	dph3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.751803848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782762	2539388	2540491	275953	277019	SPCC24B10.12	SPBC28E12.04	cgi121	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.869064797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782763	2539388	2538806	275953	275387	SPCC24B10.12	SPCC1840.09	cgi121	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51333911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782764	2539388	2541361	275953	277872	SPCC24B10.12	SPBP8B7.10c	cgi121	utp16	-	SPBP8B7.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.251232433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782765	2539388	2540999	275953	277515	SPCC24B10.12	SPBC4B4.04	cgi121	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.846607234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782766	2539388	2540979	275953	277495	SPCC24B10.12	SPBC3H7.10	cgi121	elp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.293814902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782767	2539388	2539434	275953	275997	SPCC24B10.12	SPCC757.09c	cgi121	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.168521122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782768	2539388	2541530	275953	278030	SPCC24B10.12	SPAC57A10.10c	cgi121	sla1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.932814412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782769	2539388	2542180	275953	278655	SPCC24B10.12	SPAC589.07c	cgi121	atg1801	-	atg18|atg18a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.995725729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782770	2539388	2543685	275953	280099	SPCC24B10.12	SPAC3C7.03c	cgi121	rad55	-	rhp55	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.507596977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782771	2539388	2541311	275953	277823	SPCC24B10.12	SPBP8B7.09c	cgi121	los1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.256867299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782772	2539388	2543563	275953	279979	SPCC24B10.12	SPAC664.02c	cgi121	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.86413464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782773	2539388	2541522	275953	278023	SPCC24B10.12	SPAC23E2.01	cgi121	fep1	-	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844335897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782774	2539388	2543319	275953	279743	SPCC24B10.12	SPAC6B12.09	cgi121	trm10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.527752992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782775	2539388	2542791	275953	279240	SPCC24B10.12	SPAC167.04	cgi121	pam17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812176691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782776	2539388	2540825	275953	277343	SPCC24B10.12	SPBC428.08c	cgi121	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.400611349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782777	2539388	2542568	275953	279024	SPCC24B10.12	SPAC1952.02	cgi121	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.89533332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782778	2539388	2542036	275953	278518	SPCC24B10.12	SPAC23A1.19c	cgi121	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.081854337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782779	2539388	2540797	275953	277316	SPCC24B10.12	SPBC18H10.11c	cgi121	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574044956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782780	2539388	2542513	275953	278971	SPCC24B10.12	SPAC1952.05	cgi121	gcn5	-	kat2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.68891436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782781	2539388	2540396	275953	276924	SPCC24B10.12	SPBC31F10.12	cgi121	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.841900974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782782	2539388	2540673	275953	277198	SPCC24B10.12	SPBC1D7.03	cgi121	mug80	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.161531157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782783	2539388	2539857	275953	276404	SPCC24B10.12	SPBC1604.20c	cgi121	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.577441662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782784	2539388	2541310	275953	277822	SPCC24B10.12	SPBP18G5.03	cgi121	toc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.034063896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782785	2539388	2541739	275953	278233	SPCC24B10.12	SPAC2G11.10c	cgi121	SPAC2G11.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.962149693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782786	2539388	2540326	275953	276856	SPCC24B10.12	SPBC2G5.06c	cgi121	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38595099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782787	2539388	2542409	275953	278873	SPCC24B10.12	SPAC17G8.10c	cgi121	dma1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.944651946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782788	2539388	2540430	275953	276958	SPCC24B10.12	SPBC25B2.01	cgi121	SPBC25B2.01	-	SPBC2G5.08	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.945270158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782789	2539388	2540751	275953	277273	SPCC24B10.12	SPBC20F10.10	cgi121	psl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.612482703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782790	2539388	2541708	275953	278203	SPCC24B10.12	SPAC31A2.02	cgi121	trm112	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.138283577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782791	2539388	2540342	275953	276871	SPCC24B10.12	SPBC2G2.01c	cgi121	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.611730281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782792	2539388	2541614	275953	278111	SPCC24B10.12	SPAC29A4.20	cgi121	elp3	-	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.679385168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782793	2539388	2541337	275953	277848	SPCC24B10.12	SPBP35G2.13c	cgi121	swc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.121933196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782794	2539388	2541378	275953	277889	SPCC24B10.12	SPBP8B7.21	cgi121	ubp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.889296408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782795	2539388	2542973	275953	279412	SPCC24B10.12	SPAC10F6.04	cgi121	SPAC10F6.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.502509503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782796	2539388	2538848	275953	275429	SPCC24B10.12	SPCC613.12c	cgi121	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.387838197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782797	2539388	2541017	275953	277532	SPCC24B10.12	SPBC36.07	cgi121	elp1	-	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.325934258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782798	2539388	2541713	275953	278208	SPCC24B10.12	SPAC3A12.12	cgi121	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.807284355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782799	2539388	2539160	275953	275732	SPCC24B10.12	SPCC18.17c	cgi121	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713843525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782800	2539388	2540442	275953	276970	SPCC24B10.12	SPBC25B2.04c	cgi121	mtg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.258476969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782801	2539388	2539354	275953	275920	SPCC24B10.12	SPCC4F11.03c	cgi121	SPCC4F11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.566753305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782802	2539388	2542759	275953	279209	SPCC24B10.12	SPAC9G1.07	cgi121	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.627463183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782803	2539388	2539082	275953	275654	SPCC24B10.12	SPCC126.03	cgi121	pus1	-	lps1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.271694571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782804	2539388	2543071	275953	279504	SPCC24B10.12	SPAC3C7.06c	cgi121	pit1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780791452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782805	2539388	2542883	275953	279328	SPCC24B10.12	SPAC1486.04c	cgi121	alm1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927681912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782806	2539388	2543304	275953	279728	SPCC24B10.12	SPAC6B12.12	cgi121	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982215671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782807	2539388	2540604	275953	277130	SPCC24B10.12	SPBC25D12.05	cgi121	trm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.564164839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782808	2539388	2540699	275953	277223	SPCC24B10.12	SPBC800.08	cgi121	gcd10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.510380412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782809	2539388	2542891	275953	279335	SPCC24B10.12	SPAC6F12.12	cgi121	par2	-	pbp2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143053173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782810	2539388	2539928	275953	276472	SPCC24B10.12	SPBC1604.08c	cgi121	imp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455699928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782811	2539388	2539483	275953	276046	SPCC24B10.12	SPCC584.02	cgi121	cuf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.004191181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782812	2539388	2541129	275953	277644	SPCC24B10.12	SPBC713.11c	cgi121	pmp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.847856394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782813	2539388	2543387	275953	279809	SPCC24B10.12	SPAPB1E7.02c	cgi121	mcl1	-	slr3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.030557082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782814	2539388	2542424	275953	278886	SPCC24B10.12	SPAC1805.14	cgi121	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.461380609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782815	2539388	2541867	275953	278357	SPCC24B10.12	SPAC22E12.14c	cgi121	sck2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.492295194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782816	2539388	2543374	275953	279796	SPCC24B10.12	SPAPB1A10.08	cgi121	SPAPB1A10.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.630644154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782817	2539388	2540787	275953	277306	SPCC24B10.12	SPBC1921.07c	cgi121	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.501425475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782818	2540788	2539147	277307	275719	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC622.12c	swd2	gdh1	swd2.1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930905297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782819	2540788	2540105	277307	276642	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC106.04	swd2	ada1	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.804513876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782820	2540788	2543529	277307	279947	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC4C5.02c	swd2	ryh1	swd2.1	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.088814942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782821	2540788	2543064	277307	279497	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC3G6.01	swd2	hrp3	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.087742388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782822	2540788	2539855	277307	276403	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC14F5.07	swd2	doa10	swd2.1	ssm4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709415817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782823	2540788	2539582	277307	276141	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC594.07c	swd2	bqt3	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.991553894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782824	2540788	2539035	277307	275608	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC794.09c	swd2	tef101	swd2.1	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.054135839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782825	2540788	2539930	277307	276474	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC1198.11c	swd2	reb1	swd2.1	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.999572558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782826	2540788	3361561	277307	280637	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC11E3.01c	swd2	swr1	swd2.1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512334428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782827	2540788	2542747	277307	279197	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC15A10.06	swd2	SPAC15A10.06	swd2.1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877942692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782828	2540788	2540686	277307	277211	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC21D10.10	swd2	bdc1	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.974570412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782829	2540788	2541771	277307	278265	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC23H3.06	swd2	apl6	swd2.1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808203795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782830	2540788	2541082	277307	277597	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC577.11	swd2	SPBC577.11	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569005184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782831	2540788	2539451	277307	276014	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC63.13	swd2	SPCC63.13	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700358174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782832	2540788	2540999	277307	277515	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC4B4.04	swd2	SPBC4B4.04	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.694736941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782833	2540788	2539226	277307	275796	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC16C4.20c	swd2	SPCC16C4.20c	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.468010299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782834	2540788	2541208	277307	277722	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC887.04c	swd2	lub1	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.853289489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782835	2540788	2542273	277307	278742	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC17H9.13c	swd2	SPAC17H9.13c	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.19016013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782836	2540788	2541500	277307	278002	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC227.18	swd2	lys3	swd2.1	SPAC2F7.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.055484487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782837	2540788	2543681	277307	280095	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC9.02c	swd2	SPAC9.02c	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.845571535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782838	2540788	2542689	277307	279142	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC29B12.04	swd2	snz1	swd2.1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.608724706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782839	2540788	2542555	277307	279012	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC1952.06c	swd2	SPAC1952.06c	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.413148798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782840	2540788	2539117	277307	275689	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC74.06	swd2	mak3	swd2.1	phk2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043859032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782841	2540788	2541541	277307	278041	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC1F7.11c	swd2	SPAC1F7.11c	swd2.1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149429712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782842	2540788	2540929	277307	277445	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC354.03	swd2	swd3	swd2.1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.484916614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782843	2540788	2543029	277307	279465	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC11G7.01	swd2	SPAC11G7.01	swd2.1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982676809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782844	2540788	2539792	277307	276342	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC1271.14	swd2	SPBC1271.14	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.844753738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782845	2540788	2540595	277307	277121	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC21C3.02c	swd2	dep1	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77608837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782846	2540788	2540663	277307	277188	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC56F2.06	swd2	mug147	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573522344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782847	2540788	2543641	277307	280055	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC3H5.08c	swd2	SPAC3H5.08c	swd2.1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09169256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782848	2540788	2539244	277307	275814	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC1672.06c	swd2	asp1	swd2.1	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.931672286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782849	2540788	2543563	277307	279979	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC664.02c	swd2	arp8	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.982795286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782850	2540788	2539100	277307	275672	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC330.12c	swd2	sdh3	swd2.1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.404038624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782851	2540788	2538845	277307	275426	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC1235.13	swd2	ght6	swd2.1	meu12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.15186692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782852	2540788	2542300	277307	278767	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC1687.22c	swd2	puf3	swd2.1	SPAC222.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385827209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782853	2540788	2541021	277307	277536	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC3B8.10c	swd2	nem1	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.679013179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782854	2540788	2542665	277307	279118	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC10F6.08c	swd2	nht10	swd2.1	nht1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.146495747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782855	2540788	2540892	277307	277408	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC530.01	swd2	gyp1	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.261015388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782856	2540788	2542513	277307	278971	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC1952.05	swd2	gcn5	swd2.1	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45488989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782857	2540788	2543445	277307	279865	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC4F10.13c	swd2	mpd2	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.119143029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782858	2540788	2543638	277307	280052	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC3H8.09c	swd2	nab3	swd2.1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.773648436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782859	2540788	2540886	277307	277403	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC4F6.10	swd2	vps901	swd2.1	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.496189327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782860	2540788	2541876	277307	278366	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAP27G11.11c	swd2	SPAP27G11.11c	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.621482742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782861	2540788	2539999	277307	276543	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC1734.15	swd2	rsc4	swd2.1	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.068731656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782862	2540788	2541496	277307	277998	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC23D3.09	swd2	arp42	swd2.1	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.960243687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782863	2540788	2541183	277307	277697	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC725.14	swd2	arg6	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.04719355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782864	2540788	2541710	277307	278205	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC343.11c	swd2	msc1	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.503616383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782865	2540788	2542032	277307	278514	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC23C11.04c	swd2	pnk1	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.205391232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782866	2540788	2539815	277307	276365	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC1105.02c	swd2	lys4	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.492790971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782867	2540788	2543495	277307	279914	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC513.03	swd2	mfm2	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.837441452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782868	2540788	2540077	277307	276615	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC17D11.04c	swd2	nto1	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.701831033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782869	2540788	2542254	277307	278724	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC30D11.04c	swd2	nup124	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.743437658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782870	2540788	2542867	277307	279312	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC343.16	swd2	lys2	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.351346235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782871	2540788	5802861	277307	857999	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC1D4.01	swd2	tls1	swd2.1	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326371585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782872	2540788	2541536	277307	278036	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC1071.02	swd2	mms19	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.416441464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782873	2540788	2541708	277307	278203	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC31A2.02	swd2	trm112	swd2.1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03826074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782874	2540788	2541053	277307	277568	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC56F2.10c	swd2	alg5	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.715172867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782875	2540788	2540967	277307	277483	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC36B7.08c	swd2	SPBC36B7.08c	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.325796188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782876	2540788	2539498	277307	276061	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC645.11c	swd2	mug117	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.942920394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782877	2540788	2540821	277307	277339	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC800.03	swd2	clr3	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388776177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782878	2540788	2539706	277307	276259	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC16G5.13	swd2	ptf2	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.790907839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782879	2540788	2542806	277307	279254	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC1610.01	swd2	saf5	swd2.1	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.009046805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782880	2540788	2539160	277307	275732	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC18.17c	swd2	SPCC18.17c	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.498711486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782881	2540788	2543391	277307	279813	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC4G9.09c	swd2	arg11	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.147350672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782882	2540788	2542759	277307	279209	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC9G1.07	swd2	SPAC9G1.07	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.056296001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782883	2540788	2538762	277307	275345	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC306.04c	swd2	set1	swd2.1	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094253439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782884	2540788	2539925	277307	276469	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC16H5.13	swd2	SPBC16H5.13	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.399201983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782885	2540788	2542541	277307	278998	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC1B3.03c	swd2	wis2	swd2.1	cyp5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.710883233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782886	2540788	2540725	277307	277248	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC215.14c	swd2	vps20	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.491302791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782887	2540788	2540115	277307	276652	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC1778.02	swd2	rap1	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636919895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782888	2540788	2539346	277307	275912	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC569.04	swd2	SPCC569.04	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441867917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782889	2540788	2543077	277307	279510	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC806.04c	swd2	SPAC806.04c	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.187194366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782890	2540788	2541531	277307	278031	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC25A8.01c	swd2	fft3	swd2.1	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.524363768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782891	2540788	2542918	277307	279359	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC12G12.12	swd2	SPAC12G12.12	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.61029535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782892	2540788	2543437	277307	279857	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAPB1A10.14	swd2	pof15	swd2.1	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.559635887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782893	2540788	2541404	277307	277913	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBPB2B2.18	swd2	SPBPB2B2.18	swd2.1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046772471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782894	2540788	2543602	277307	280017	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAPB1A11.04c	swd2	mca1	swd2.1	SPAPB1A11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.124171081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782895	2540788	2540516	277307	277044	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC21C3.01c	swd2	vps13a	swd2.1	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.446860054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782896	2540788	2539928	277307	276472	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC1604.08c	swd2	imp1	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.948997077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782897	2540788	2539920	277307	276464	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC119.08	swd2	pmk1	swd2.1	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.443036252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782898	2540788	2543072	277307	279505	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC3A12.09c	swd2	SPAC3A12.09c	swd2.1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039334974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782899	2540788	2539178	277307	275749	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC1682.14	swd2	rpl1902	swd2.1	rpl19-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.718255504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782900	2540788	2538792	277307	275373	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCP1E11.10	swd2	SPCP1E11.10	swd2.1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.102099001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782901	2540788	2538827	277307	275408	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCC63.14	swd2	eis1	swd2.1	SPCC63.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.218905992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782902	2540788	2538854	277307	275435	SPBC18H10.06c	SPCP1E11.05c	swd2	are2	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.238802393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782903	2540788	2541050	277307	277565	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC428.05c	swd2	arg12	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.227568985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782904	2540788	2542700	277307	279153	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC26H5.08c	swd2	bgl2	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573941711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782905	2540788	2543333	277307	279756	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC694.02	swd2	SPAC694.02	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.257883206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782906	2540788	2542656	277307	279110	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC2E1P3.05c	swd2	SPAC2E1P3.05c	swd2.1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093023668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782907	2540788	2542561	277307	279017	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC31G5.17c	swd2	rps1001	swd2.1	rps10-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.342339916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782908	2540788	2542094	277307	278571	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC29B12.06c	swd2	rcd1	swd2.1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87376121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782909	2540788	2541062	277307	277577	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC660.11	swd2	tcg1	swd2.1	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.980464706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782910	2540788	2540798	277307	277317	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC19C7.01	swd2	mni1	swd2.1	SPBC32F12.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.194828744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782911	2540788	2543616	277307	280030	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC4A8.09c	swd2	cwf21	swd2.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378423667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782912	2540788	2542609	277307	279063	SPBC18H10.06c	SPAC31G5.04	swd2	lys12	swd2.1	SPAC31G5.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.742558684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782913	2540788	2540649	277307	277174	SPBC18H10.06c	SPBC19F8.08	swd2	rps401	swd2.1	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702212368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782914	2538890	2542598	275468	279052	SPCC1393.02c	SPAC6G10.08	spt2	idp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.382055732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782915	2538890	2540929	275468	277445	SPCC1393.02c	SPBC354.03	spt2	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578146655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782916	2538890	2539032	275468	275605	SPCC1393.02c	SPCC4B3.05c	spt2	hem12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.3317016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782917	2538890	2538706	275468	275290	SPCC1393.02c	SPCC338.08	spt2	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378213139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782918	2538890	2542032	275468	278514	SPCC1393.02c	SPAC23C11.04c	spt2	pnk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.984156069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782919	2538890	2539481	275468	276044	SPCC1393.02c	SPCC622.16c	spt2	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.55929613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782920	2538890	2541531	275468	278031	SPCC1393.02c	SPAC25A8.01c	spt2	fft3	-	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.341511722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782921	2538890	2542418	275468	278881	SPCC1393.02c	SPAC1805.07c	spt2	dad2	-	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.456742217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782922	2538890	2538840	275468	275421	SPCC1393.02c	SPCC736.07c	spt2	SPCC736.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.76707111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782923	2538890	2542059	275468	278537	SPCC1393.02c	SPAC328.06	spt2	ubp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.901403781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782924	3361512	2543617	280588	280031	SPAC3C7.01c	SPAC4A8.10	sac12	SPAC4A8.10	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.564378011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782925	3361512	2543064	280588	279497	SPAC3C7.01c	SPAC3G6.01	sac12	hrp3	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.852741079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782926	3361512	2542701	280588	279154	SPAC3C7.01c	SPAC26H5.05	sac12	mga2	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.644061527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782927	3361512	2540664	280588	277189	SPAC3C7.01c	SPBC215.02	sac12	bob1	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.305136126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782928	3361512	2541250	280588	277764	SPAC3C7.01c	SPBC8D2.17	sac12	gmh4	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	SPBC8D2.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851548788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782929	3361512	2541776	280588	278270	SPAC3C7.01c	SPAC23H3.05c	sac12	swd1	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913339685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782930	3361512	2540831	280588	277349	SPAC3C7.01c	SPBC428.02c	sac12	eca39	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	SPBC582.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781010033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782931	3361512	2539667	280588	276222	SPAC3C7.01c	SPBC13G1.08c	sac12	ash2	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.751171899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782932	3361512	2541464	280588	277966	SPAC3C7.01c	SPAC222.08c	sac12	SPAC222.08c	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.487810188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782933	3361512	2539925	280588	276469	SPAC3C7.01c	SPBC16H5.13	sac12	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.288365393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782934	3361512	2541789	280588	278281	SPAC3C7.01c	SPAC23H4.08	sac12	iwr1	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.074865953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782935	3361512	2539205	280588	275775	SPAC3C7.01c	SPCC4B3.15	sac12	mid1	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.138078298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782936	3361512	2542094	280588	278571	SPAC3C7.01c	SPAC29B12.06c	sac12	rcd1	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035023507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782937	2542311	2539774	278777	276325	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC17A3.10	dad1	pas4	-	pi036	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147624318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782938	2542311	2539050	278777	275623	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC11E10.08	dad1	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.617369338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782939	2542311	2538721	278777	275305	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC1494.10	dad1	adn3	-	SPCC70.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.477285535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782940	2542311	2540060	278777	276598	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC106.01	dad1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.060426879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782941	2542311	2542577	278777	279033	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC19G12.15c	dad1	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.87561875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782942	2542311	2539405	278777	275970	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC553.03	dad1	pex1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816888383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782943	2542311	2540789	278777	277308	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC19C2.06c	dad1	mug124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.502513866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782944	2542311	2539949	278777	276493	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC1703.04	dad1	mlh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.437512495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782945	2542311	2542518	278777	278976	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC1B3.16c	dad1	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.932337899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782946	2542311	2541343	278777	277854	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBPB2B2.19c	dad1	SPBPB2B2.19c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329494453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782947	2542311	2541985	278777	278470	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC20G8.04c	dad1	SPAC20G8.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.129273531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782948	2542311	2539452	278777	276015	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC70.03c	dad1	SPCC70.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.192780524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782949	2542311	2539940	278777	276484	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC16A3.10	dad1	SPBC16A3.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.116982341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782950	2542311	2543287	278777	279712	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC9E9.05	dad1	SPAC9E9.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868405115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782951	2542311	2539684	278777	276239	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC16A3.16	dad1	SPBC16A3.16	-	cwc27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.74925338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782952	2542311	2540956	278777	277472	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC409.06	dad1	uch2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.255951515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782953	2542311	2542671	278777	279124	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC824.09c	dad1	SPAC824.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.197632747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782954	2542311	2540653	278777	277178	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC215.07c	dad1	SPBC215.07c	-	pdp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.671301088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782955	2542311	2539301	278777	275869	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC622.03c	dad1	SPCC622.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.772606261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782956	2542311	2539282	278777	275850	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC622.06c	dad1	SPCC622.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.206425778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782957	2542311	2538985	278777	275559	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC13B11.03c	dad1	SPCC13B11.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992313694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782958	2542311	2543578	278777	279993	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC9.10	dad1	thi9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511788825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782959	2542311	2539951	278777	276495	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC11B10.05c	dad1	rsp1	-	pi006|SPACTOKYO_453.30c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199012111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782960	2542311	3361119	278777	280195	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC663.07c	dad1	SPCC663.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867249767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782961	2542311	2541130	278777	277645	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC776.11	dad1	rpl2801	-	rpl28-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933161153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782962	2542311	2538929	278777	275505	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC162.02c	dad1	SPCC162.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712813478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782963	2542311	2540099	278777	276637	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC16H5.11c	dad1	skb1	-	rmt5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86335113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782964	2542311	2542502	278777	278960	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC139.06	dad1	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.664557578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782965	2542311	2541345	278777	277856	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBP35G2.07	dad1	ilv1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982476376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782966	2542311	2543432	278777	279852	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC4G8.05	dad1	ppk14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.168986044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782967	2542311	2543527	278777	279945	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC4C5.01	dad1	SPAC4C5.01	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.943865808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782968	2542311	2540402	278777	276930	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC30D10.05c	dad1	SPBC30D10.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982393938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782969	2542311	2539028	278777	275601	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC1281.07c	dad1	SPCC1281.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.869096716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782970	2542311	2540579	278777	277105	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC28E12.02	dad1	SPBC28E12.02	-	SPBC9B6.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637458933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782971	2542311	2540491	278777	277019	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC28E12.04	dad1	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321787524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782972	2542311	2540455	278777	276983	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC215.05	dad1	gpd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.617954206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782973	2542311	2540664	278777	277189	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC215.02	dad1	bob1	-	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.244028407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782974	2542311	2541891	278777	278381	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC1F8.03c	dad1	str3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.102228466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782975	2542311	2543098	278777	279530	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC4A8.06c	dad1	SPAC4A8.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446541855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782976	2542311	2539332	278777	275898	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCPB1C11.01	dad1	amt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041058281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782977	2542311	2540975	278777	277491	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC354.12	dad1	gpd3	-	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.227953287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782978	2542311	2539420	278777	275985	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC970.07c	dad1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.941329572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782979	2542311	2540015	278777	276559	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC1685.02c	dad1	rps1202	-	rps12-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979471149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782980	2542311	2542468	278777	278929	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC1D4.09c	dad1	rtf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.534669594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782981	2542311	2542107	278777	278583	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC30.01c	dad1	sec72	-	sec7b|sec702	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.716649413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782982	2542311	2540564	278777	277091	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC530.03c	dad1	bag102	-	bag1-b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.269618729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782983	2542311	2541208	278777	277722	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC887.04c	dad1	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.591627307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782984	2542311	2542179	278777	278654	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC17C9.12	dad1	scs22	-	SPAC17C9.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86477319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782985	2542311	2542677	278777	279130	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC26F1.10c	dad1	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.933895433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782986	2542311	2540979	278777	277495	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC3H7.10	dad1	elp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.508158764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782987	2542311	2539970	278777	276514	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC1773.01	dad1	far8	-	SPBC1773.01|csc3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.150435917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782988	2542311	2539443	278777	276006	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC736.02	dad1	SPCC736.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.274912609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782989	2542311	2541058	278777	277573	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC3H7.09	dad1	erf2	-	mug142	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808538276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782990	2542311	2538814	278777	275395	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC777.17c	dad1	SPCC777.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317137624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782991	2542311	2543659	278777	280073	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC922.07c	dad1	atd2	-	SPAC922.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.281147574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782992	2542311	2539045	278777	275618	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC1235.05c	dad1	fft2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.244021726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782993	2542311	2541285	278777	277798	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC9B6.09c	dad1	mdl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702338259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782994	2542311	2543260	278777	279688	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC1002.17c	dad1	urg2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.813941539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782995	2542311	2542696	278777	279149	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC29B12.03	dad1	spd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.657066022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782996	2542311	2542689	278777	279142	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC29B12.04	dad1	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.120593028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782997	2542311	2540919	278777	277435	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC543.07	dad1	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.720643826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782998	2542311	2539472	278777	276035	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC794.03	dad1	SPCC794.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.269997867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
782999	2542311	2539606	278777	276164	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC15D4.05	dad1	SPBC15D4.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.118019284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783000	2542311	2540306	278777	276836	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC2G5.02c	dad1	ckb2	-	SPBC2G5.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.15920839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783001	2542311	2542848	278777	279294	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC9G1.03c	dad1	rpl3001	-	rpl30|rpl30-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.48305152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783002	2542311	2540313	278777	276843	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC337.04	dad1	ppk27	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808549633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783003	2542311	2538833	278777	275414	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCP1E11.11	dad1	puf6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.876628437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783004	2542311	2543636	278777	280050	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC3H8.08c	dad1	SPAC3H8.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.558190137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783005	2542311	2539988	278777	276532	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC1271.05c	dad1	SPBC1271.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817112103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783006	2542311	2541346	278777	277857	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBP8B7.08c	dad1	ppm1	-	SPBP8B7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.825099886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783007	2542311	2540676	278777	277201	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC3E7.11c	dad1	SPBC3E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.075892223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783008	2542311	2541227	278777	277741	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC947.05c	dad1	frp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.409802493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783009	2542311	2542318	278777	278784	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC16C9.05	dad1	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.488848663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783010	2542311	2539365	278777	275931	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC24B10.16c	dad1	SPCC24B10.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.510276708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783011	2542311	2542023	278777	278506	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC20H4.10	dad1	ufd2	-	SPAC145.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.364759258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783012	2542311	2540830	278777	277348	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC18H10.16	dad1	can1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.003205335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783013	2542311	2540851	278777	277368	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC4F6.04	dad1	rpl2502	-	rpl23a-2|rpl25b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.150678859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783014	2542311	2540595	278777	277121	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC21C3.02c	dad1	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.537551146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783015	2542311	2539822	278777	276372	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC16G5.02c	dad1	SPBC16G5.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873355521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783016	2542311	2540344	278777	276873	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC30D10.03c	dad1	SPBC30D10.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330699237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783017	2542311	2542146	278777	278622	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC1B3.10c	dad1	SPAC1B3.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325501606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783018	2542311	2541295	278777	277807	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC947.09	dad1	hsp3103	-	SPBC947.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.8138801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783019	2542311	2543563	278777	279979	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC664.02c	dad1	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.528958711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783020	2542311	2538969	278777	275543	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC1840.12	dad1	opt3	-	SPCC1840.12|SPCC965.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.441569608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783021	2542311	2543292	278777	279717	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC6C3.02c	dad1	SPAC6C3.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637586402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783022	2542311	2543426	278777	279846	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC631.02	dad1	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.081915241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783023	2542311	2542530	278777	278988	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC1399.02	dad1	SPAC1399.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990577319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783024	2542311	2543319	278777	279743	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC6B12.09	dad1	trm10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.576507061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783025	2542311	2538906	278777	275483	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC1259.03	dad1	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.656857174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783026	2542311	2540825	278777	277343	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC428.08c	dad1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.694084708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783027	2542311	2541812	278777	278303	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC23G3.12c	dad1	SPAC23G3.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874240929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783028	2542311	2539448	278777	276011	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC825.04c	dad1	naa40	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.488780385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783029	2542311	2541335	278777	277846	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBP4G3.03	dad1	SPBP4G3.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.94239301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783030	2542311	2543537	278777	279954	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC4D7.05	dad1	sum1	-	tif34	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.62321921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783031	2542311	2543514	278777	279932	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC4D7.03	dad1	pop2	-	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.617232807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783032	2542311	2541664	278777	278160	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC2H10.01	dad1	SPAC2H10.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.380233253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783033	2542311	2541741	278777	278235	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC20G4.02c	dad1	fus1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154233841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783034	2542311	2543430	278777	279850	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAPB1A10.12c	dad1	alo1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.821034762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783035	2542311	2541649	278777	278145	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC1F3.06c	dad1	spo15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.608939537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783036	2542311	2539355	278777	275921	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC1840.08c	dad1	pdi5	-	SPCC1840.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.334390817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783037	2542311	2540931	278777	277447	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC365.07c	dad1	SPBC365.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931468576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783038	2542311	2541392	278777	277902	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBPB10D8.04c	dad1	SPBPB10D8.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928375653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783039	2542311	2538751	278777	275334	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC1442.07c	dad1	SPCC1442.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.263533353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783040	2542311	2541801	278777	278292	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC2F7.08c	dad1	snf5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.95274915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783041	2542311	2543461	278777	279881	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC521.03	dad1	SPAC521.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714584136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783042	2542311	2540903	278777	277419	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC530.05	dad1	prt1	-	SPBC530.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040900916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783043	2542311	2543511	278777	279929	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC4G9.19	dad1	SPAC4G9.19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049280922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783044	2542311	2541264	278777	277778	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC902.06	dad1	mto2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.631385721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783045	2542311	2542105	278777	278581	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC14C4.15c	dad1	SPAC14C4.15c	-	SPAPJ760.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81416083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783046	2542311	2543598	278777	280013	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC4G9.14	dad1	SPAC4G9.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382310787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783047	2542311	2543593	278777	280008	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC4G9.10	dad1	arg3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922835058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783048	2542311	2543445	278777	279865	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC4F10.13c	dad1	mpd2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.751340976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783049	2542311	2539340	278777	275906	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC1906.04	dad1	wtf20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568080456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783050	2542311	2540348	278777	276877	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC29A10.05	dad1	exo1	-	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.822085608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783051	2542311	2540922	278777	277438	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC36.10	dad1	SPBC36.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036884206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783052	2542311	2542507	278777	278965	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC18G6.13	dad1	SPAC18G6.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775209023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783053	2542311	2540987	278777	277503	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC36B7.05c	dad1	SPBC36B7.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769950427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783054	2542311	2540352	278777	276881	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC215.03c	dad1	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.573167819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783055	2542311	2540673	278777	277198	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC1D7.03	dad1	mug80	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.033642957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783056	2542311	2542464	278777	278925	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC1A6.09c	dad1	lag1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.028076193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783057	2542311	2539394	278777	275959	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC1620.13	dad1	SPCC1620.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322629735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783058	2542311	2539219	278777	275789	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC1795.01c	dad1	mad3	-	SPCC895.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.697186143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783059	2542311	2541943	278777	278430	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC222.07c	dad1	hri2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205043305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783060	2542311	2542873	278777	279318	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC9G1.02	dad1	wis4	-	wak1|wik1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505099716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783061	2542311	2543667	278777	280081	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC4H3.02c	dad1	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.799355811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783062	2542311	2541166	278777	277681	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC725.15	dad1	ura5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.253953711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783063	2542311	2539603	278777	276161	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC1289.06c	dad1	ppr8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.20258057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783064	2542311	2543246	278777	279674	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAPB8E5.05	dad1	mfm1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.336127125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783065	2542311	2541899	278777	278389	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC22E12.11c	dad1	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.174539487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783066	2542311	2539586	278777	276145	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC70.08c	dad1	SPCC70.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.129958131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783067	2542311	2541710	278777	278205	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC343.11c	dad1	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.914568629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783068	2542311	2541187	278777	277701	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC776.14	dad1	plh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.910830048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783069	2542311	2542861	278777	279307	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC13G7.13c	dad1	msa1	-	SPAC6C3.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455930692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783070	2542311	2541830	278777	278321	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC5H10.01	dad1	SPAC5H10.01	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991472612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783071	2542311	2542782	278777	279231	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC1687.06c	dad1	rpl44	-	rpl28	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979809331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783072	2542311	3361269	278777	280345	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC31A8.01c	dad1	rtn1	-	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.132807445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783073	2542311	2542126	278777	278602	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC1B3.05	dad1	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.573811957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783074	2542311	2540176	278777	276709	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC1709.01	dad1	chs2	-	SPBC1734.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199435471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783075	2542311	2540200	278777	276733	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC1709.06	dad1	dus2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.264596877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783076	2542311	2542528	278777	278986	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC1B3.08	dad1	SPAC1B3.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.596108877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783077	2542311	2540628	278777	277154	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC25B2.08	dad1	SPBC25B2.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864741775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783078	2542311	2540997	278777	277513	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC3H7.06c	dad1	pof9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.617876993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783079	2542311	2538970	278777	275544	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC306.10	dad1	wtf8	-	wtf3-pseudo	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.740117086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783080	2542311	2538774	278777	275356	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC162.06c	dad1	SPCC162.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.993504369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783081	2542311	2542946	278777	279386	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC6F12.03c	dad1	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.915673077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783082	2542311	2541451	278777	277956	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC23G3.02c	dad1	sib1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.407054527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783083	2542311	2538880	278777	275459	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC1393.09c	dad1	SPCC1393.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933776519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783084	2542311	2541241	278777	277755	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC887.17	dad1	SPBC887.17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816845824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783085	2542311	2539232	278777	275802	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC1223.04c	dad1	set11	-	mug76	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.052752259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783086	2542311	2543311	278777	279735	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC977.15	dad1	SPAC977.15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.872553334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783087	2542311	2543105	278777	279537	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC343.10	dad1	met11	-	mthfr2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816974651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783088	2542311	2542919	278777	279360	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC6C3.08	dad1	nas6	-	SPAC6C3.08	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.672189209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783089	2542311	2539424	278777	275989	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC622.19	dad1	jmj4	-	mug149	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.848044771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783090	2542311	2540387	278777	276915	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC24C6.04	dad1	SPBC24C6.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.342209738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783091	2542311	2538824	278777	275405	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC1442.14c	dad1	hnt1	-	SPCC1442.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864564706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783092	2542311	2543443	278777	279863	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC3H1.12c	dad1	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.372058162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783093	2542311	2541389	278777	277900	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBPB2B2.09c	dad1	SPBPB2B2.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.752867364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783094	2542311	2539936	278777	276480	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC1685.05	dad1	SPBC1685.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.670108229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783095	2542311	2542618	278777	279072	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC1952.15c	dad1	rec24	-	mug6	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.457109691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783096	2542311	2541142	278777	277657	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC725.04	dad1	SPBC725.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.51379983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783097	2542311	2540201	278777	276734	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC13A2.04c	dad1	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515596078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783098	2542311	2542960	278777	279400	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC1039.04	dad1	SPAC1039.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.008176401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783099	2542311	2540967	278777	277483	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC36B7.08c	dad1	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.143892361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783100	2542311	2540850	278777	277367	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC18A7.02c	dad1	SPBC18A7.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.33516875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783101	2542311	2540533	278777	277061	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC29A10.16c	dad1	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922387635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783102	2542311	2540687	278777	277212	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC21D10.08c	dad1	SPBC21D10.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09333355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783103	2542311	2542550	278777	279007	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC1B3.02c	dad1	SPAC1B3.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.971023309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783104	2542311	2538884	278777	275462	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC1393.08	dad1	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582038398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783105	2542311	2542829	278777	279276	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC13D6.02c	dad1	byr3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.980651756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783106	2542311	2539569	278777	276129	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCPB16A4.03c	dad1	ade10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982622045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783107	2542311	2540193	278777	276726	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC1289.10c	dad1	adn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.337825087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783108	2542311	2541337	278777	277848	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBP35G2.13c	dad1	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.243525857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783109	2542311	2540589	278777	277115	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC20F10.06	dad1	mad2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.408424441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783110	2542311	2539964	278777	276508	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC1773.03c	dad1	SPBC1773.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.886670219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783111	2542311	2541793	278777	278284	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC22H10.02	dad1	SPAC22H10.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77066427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783112	2542311	2541963	278777	278449	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC21E11.04	dad1	aca1	-	ppr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.720324664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783113	2542311	2538848	278777	275429	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC613.12c	dad1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.556741682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783114	2542311	2539908	278777	276454	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC13E7.06	dad1	msd1	-	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.695301806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783115	2542311	2539706	278777	276259	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC16G5.13	dad1	ptf2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.8151951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783116	2542311	2540701	278777	277225	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC19C7.08c	dad1	SPBC19C7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709197263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783117	2542311	2539686	278777	276241	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC1734.06	dad1	rhp18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.125031133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783118	2542311	2538907	278777	275484	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC24B10.19c	dad1	nts1	-	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816902761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783119	2542311	2539160	278777	275732	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC18.17c	dad1	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.618673221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783120	2542311	2539499	278777	276062	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC622.08c	dad1	hta1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.69294706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783121	2542311	2539362	278777	275928	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC18B5.10c	dad1	SPCC18B5.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.042600785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783122	2542311	2539082	278777	275654	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC126.03	dad1	pus1	-	lps1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932745813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783123	2542311	2540121	278777	276658	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC119.14	dad1	rti1	-	rad22B	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.250242154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783124	2542311	2539896	278777	276442	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC146.02	dad1	SPBC146.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.203362046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783125	2542311	2539108	278777	275680	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC1223.02	dad1	nmt1	-	thi3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.202037649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783126	2542311	2539030	278777	275603	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCP1E11.02	dad1	ppk38	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378568384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783127	2542311	2540800	278777	277319	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC409.20c	dad1	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978799353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783128	2542311	2540152	278777	276688	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC12C2.03c	dad1	SPBC12C2.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.843806154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783129	2542311	2540384	278777	276913	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC29A10.11c	dad1	vps902	-	vps9b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.868386748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783130	2542311	2540960	278777	277476	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC3D6.02	dad1	but2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.970686795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783131	2542311	2542075	278777	278552	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC27D7.06	dad1	etf1	-	SPAC27D7.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.410057642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783132	2542311	2541279	278777	277792	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC8E4.03	dad1	SPBC8E4.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581052757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783133	2542311	2543130	278777	279562	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC869.05c	dad1	SPAC869.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.340780244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783134	2542311	2538714	278777	275298	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC330.11	dad1	btb1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814519211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783135	2542311	2541376	278777	277887	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBP8B7.04	dad1	mug45	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.272411215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783136	2542311	2539707	278777	276260	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC17F3.01c	dad1	rga5	-	SPBC557.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988645533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783137	2542311	2543662	278777	280076	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC9.07c	dad1	SPAC9.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.715558813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783138	2542311	2540977	278777	277493	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC3E7.02c	dad1	hsp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450640925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783139	2542311	2541459	278777	277961	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC227.11c	dad1	SPAC227.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.777928778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783140	2542311	2541425	278777	277930	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC2C4.17c	dad1	msy2	-	SPAC2C4.17c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378140762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783141	2542311	2539471	278777	276034	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC576.14	dad1	dph5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.080738571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783142	2542311	2541531	278777	278031	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC25A8.01c	dad1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.80424564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783143	2542311	2541948	278777	278435	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC222.13c	dad1	SPAC222.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327403032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783144	2542311	2541114	278777	277629	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC582.09	dad1	pex11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.772914862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783145	2542311	2540891	278777	277407	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC582.08	dad1	SPBC582.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.283480438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783146	2542311	2542076	278777	278553	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC29A4.19c	dad1	cta5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443279567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783147	2542311	2543091	278777	279524	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC12G12.15	dad1	sif3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.502753152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783148	2542311	2539722	278777	276275	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC14F5.11c	dad1	mug186	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877581908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783149	2542311	2539335	278777	275901	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC1450.16c	dad1	ptl1	-	SPCC1450.16c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.344669967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783150	2542311	2539188	278777	275759	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC1827.04	dad1	vms1	-	SPCC1827.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.512125898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783151	2542311	2539668	278777	276223	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC11B10.10c	dad1	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.140263968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783152	2542311	2541404	278777	277913	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBPB2B2.18	dad1	SPBPB2B2.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.917671468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783153	2542311	2541789	278777	278281	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC23H4.08	dad1	iwr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.395276387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783154	2542311	2543183	278777	279612	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC3A12.06c	dad1	SPAC3A12.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199338814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783155	2542311	2543046	278777	279481	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC3C7.10	dad1	pex13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.271737685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783156	2542311	2539736	278777	276288	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC12C2.12c	dad1	glo1	-	SPBC21D10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.804562097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783157	2542311	2542838	278777	279284	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC13G7.11	dad1	SPAC13G7.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.569388212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783158	2542311	3361511	278777	280587	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC23C4.08	dad1	rho3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817294985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783159	2542311	2542904	278777	279348	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC144.11	dad1	rps1102	-	rps11|rps11-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.192040996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783160	2542311	2542186	278777	278661	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC17C9.14	dad1	SPAC17C9.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.20420796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783161	2542311	2539189	278777	275760	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC1682.16	dad1	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.764030904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783162	2542311	2539700	278777	276253	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC1685.15c	dad1	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.322507358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783163	2542311	2539959	278777	276503	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC1703.11	dad1	SPBC1703.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.836888008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783164	2542311	2541709	278777	278204	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC3C7.02c	dad1	pil2	-	SPAC3C7.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.163859259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783165	2542311	2541806	278777	278297	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC4G8.13c	dad1	prz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.998649445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783166	2542311	2540173	278777	276706	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC106.13	dad1	SPBC106.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.59375919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783167	2542311	2540828	278777	277346	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC4B4.06	dad1	vps25	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579607791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783168	2542311	2542175	278777	278650	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC1F3.02c	dad1	mkh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.249391981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783169	2542311	2540496	278777	277024	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC800.11	dad1	SPBC800.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.334695531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783170	2542311	2540093	278777	276631	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC115.02c	dad1	afg1	-	SPBC115.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.62076974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783171	2542311	2541502	278777	278004	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC23D3.04c	dad1	gpd2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851570605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783172	2542311	2543372	278777	279794	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAPB1A10.09	dad1	ase1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.501310351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783173	2542311	2539976	278777	276520	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC1683.07	dad1	mal1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.401646056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783174	2542311	2543644	278777	280058	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAPB1A10.03	dad1	nxt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.400613163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783175	2542311	2541297	278777	277809	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC9B6.07	dad1	nop52	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77484102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783176	2542311	2541228	278777	277742	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBP16F5.08c	dad1	SPBP16F5.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448147953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783177	2542311	2541875	278777	278365	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC22F3.06c	dad1	lon1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.772595952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783178	2542311	2540798	278777	277317	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC19C7.01	dad1	mni1	-	SPBC32F12.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817530773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783179	2540307	2538796	276837	275377	SPBC1A4.01	SPCC63.06	apc10	SPCC63.06	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.34562076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783180	2540307	2538961	276837	275535	SPBC1A4.01	SPCC285.14	apc10	trs130	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.800110661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783181	2540307	2543529	276837	279947	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC4C5.02c	apc10	ryh1	SPBC1E8.06	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.596077754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783182	2540307	2542080	276837	278557	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC27D7.03c	apc10	mei2	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.864003247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783183	2540307	2540913	276837	277429	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC56F2.08c	apc10	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.51935718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783184	2540307	2542378	276837	278842	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC1805.04	apc10	nup132	SPBC1E8.06	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.87273342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783185	2540307	2539930	276837	276474	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC1198.11c	apc10	reb1	SPBC1E8.06	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.365459654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783186	2540307	2539097	276837	275669	SPBC1A4.01	SPCC757.04	apc10	SPCC757.04	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.701867307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783187	2540307	2542502	276837	278960	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC139.06	apc10	hat1	SPBC1E8.06	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.837220229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783188	2540307	2540347	276837	276876	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC30B4.08	apc10	eri1	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.31939051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783189	2540307	2540686	276837	277211	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC21D10.10	apc10	bdc1	SPBC1E8.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.233816311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783190	2540307	2538710	276837	275294	SPBC1A4.01	SPCC1020.12c	apc10	xap5	SPBC1E8.06	SPCC14G10.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.813865339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783191	2540307	2543320	276837	279744	SPBC1A4.01	SPAPJ695.01c	apc10	SPAPJ695.01c	SPBC1E8.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.961968247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783192	2540307	2539226	276837	275796	SPBC1A4.01	SPCC16C4.20c	apc10	SPCC16C4.20c	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.71810432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783193	2540307	2541208	276837	277722	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC887.04c	apc10	lub1	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.963953781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783194	2540307	2542273	276837	278742	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC17H9.13c	apc10	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.789336018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783195	2540307	2541500	276837	278002	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC227.18	apc10	lys3	SPBC1E8.06	SPAC2F7.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.944777467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783196	2540307	2539434	276837	275997	SPBC1A4.01	SPCC757.09c	apc10	rnc1	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.112499741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783197	2540307	2540692	276837	277217	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC800.07c	apc10	tsf1	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.054814777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783198	2540307	2539331	276837	275897	SPBC1A4.01	SPCC24B10.09	apc10	rps1702	SPBC1E8.06	rps17|rps17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.664591514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783199	2540307	2540220	276837	276753	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC337.03	apc10	rhn1	SPBC1E8.06	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.594956571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783200	2540307	2540425	276837	276953	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC27.06c	apc10	mgr2	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.691966112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783201	2540307	2542318	276837	278784	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC16C9.05	apc10	cph1	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.860407194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783202	2540307	2539792	276837	276342	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC1271.14	apc10	SPBC1271.14	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.268469583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783203	2540307	2543108	276837	279540	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC3A12.13c	apc10	SPAC3A12.13c	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.741461869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783204	2540307	2543563	276837	279979	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC664.02c	apc10	arp8	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.945242446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783205	2540307	2538906	276837	275483	SPBC1A4.01	SPCC1259.03	apc10	rpa12	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.754878867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783206	2540307	2542558	276837	279014	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC1952.07	apc10	rad1	SPBC1E8.06	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.368138288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783207	2540307	2540964	276837	277480	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC365.16	apc10	SPBC365.16	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.461476273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783208	2540307	2539310	276837	275877	SPBC1A4.01	SPCC285.17	apc10	spp27	SPBC1E8.06	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.104010858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783209	2540307	2542268	276837	278737	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC17A5.07c	apc10	ulp2	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778004574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783210	2540307	2541938	276837	278425	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC8C9.16c	apc10	mug63	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.142089317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783211	2540307	2542596	276837	279050	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC1B3.17	apc10	clr2	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.003451828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783212	2540307	2541801	276837	278292	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC2F7.08c	apc10	snf5	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.250355917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783213	2540307	2542463	276837	278924	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC1834.03c	apc10	hhf1	SPBC1E8.06	h4.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.69733184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783214	2540307	2540338	276837	276867	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC2G2.13c	apc10	dcd1	SPBC1E8.06	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.42548002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783215	2540307	2543638	276837	280052	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC3H8.09c	apc10	nab3	SPBC1E8.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.909953436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783216	2540307	2539484	276837	276047	SPBC1A4.01	SPCC594.04c	apc10	SPCC594.04c	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980491409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783217	2540307	2541183	276837	277697	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC725.14	apc10	arg6	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.554331533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783218	2540307	2539689	276837	276244	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC1861.03	apc10	mak10	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.334406728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783219	2540307	2541532	276837	278032	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC2C4.15c	apc10	ubx2	SPBC1E8.06	ucp13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.549982865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783220	2540307	2539667	276837	276222	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC13G1.08c	apc10	ash2	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.77166949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783221	2540307	2542126	276837	278602	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC1B3.05	apc10	not3	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.094481703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783222	2540307	2540665	276837	277190	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC83.02c	apc10	rpl4302	SPBC1E8.06	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.400663103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783223	2540307	2542946	276837	279386	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC6F12.03c	apc10	fsv1	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571698809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783224	2540307	2539815	276837	276365	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC1105.02c	apc10	lys4	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.943867737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783225	2540307	2542867	276837	279312	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC343.16	apc10	lys2	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.688726272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783226	2540307	2540318	276837	276848	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC30B4.04c	apc10	sol1	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.922872037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783227	2540307	5802861	276837	857999	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC1D4.01	apc10	tls1	SPBC1E8.06	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.13768864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783228	2540307	2542919	276837	279360	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC6C3.08	apc10	nas6	SPBC1E8.06	SPAC6C3.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.678641582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783229	2540307	2541708	276837	278203	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC31A2.02	apc10	trm112	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.223403205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783230	2540307	2542597	276837	279051	SPBC1A4.01	SPAP8A3.07c	apc10	SPAP8A3.07c	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.595814842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783231	2540307	3361470	276837	280546	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC3G9.01	apc10	nsk1	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.241543482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783232	2540307	2540882	276837	277399	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC4F6.08c	apc10	mrpl39	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.434297312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783233	2540307	2541927	276837	278415	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC222.12c	apc10	atp2	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.410936997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783234	2540307	2538884	276837	275462	SPBC1A4.01	SPCC1393.08	apc10	SPCC1393.08	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.49028343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783235	2540307	2538848	276837	275429	SPBC1A4.01	SPCC613.12c	apc10	raf1	SPBC1E8.06	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511365863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783236	2540307	3361520	276837	280596	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC1610.02c	apc10	SPAC1610.02c	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.923877177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783237	2540307	2541628	276837	278124	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC110.02	apc10	pds5	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.724079467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783238	2540307	2542725	276837	279176	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC3A12.10	apc10	rpl2001	SPBC1E8.06	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.146982508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783239	2540307	2540821	276837	277339	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC800.03	apc10	clr3	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712032869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783240	2540307	2539763	276837	276314	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC1861.05	apc10	SPBC1861.05	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.688888943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783241	2540307	2539160	276837	275732	SPBC1A4.01	SPCC18.17c	apc10	SPCC18.17c	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.391268598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783242	2540307	2543391	276837	279813	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC4G9.09c	apc10	arg11	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576882873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783243	2540307	2543628	276837	280042	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC3H8.10	apc10	spo20	SPBC1E8.06	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.113099476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783244	2540307	2539555	276837	276116	SPBC1A4.01	SPCC4B3.08	apc10	lsg1	SPBC1E8.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193905264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783245	2540307	2540619	276837	277145	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC25H2.15	apc10	SPBC25H2.15	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.304300361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783246	2540307	2541175	276837	277689	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC839.13c	apc10	rpl1601	SPBC1E8.06	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.811213605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783247	2540307	2540498	276837	277026	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC27.02c	apc10	ask1	SPBC1E8.06	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.257538834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783248	2540307	2540779	276837	277298	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC19F8.06c	apc10	meu22	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.948550863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783249	2540307	5802917	276837	858055	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC17A2.14	apc10	SPAC17A2.14	SPBC1E8.06	SPAC17G6.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.351703339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783250	2540307	2538966	276837	275540	SPBC1A4.01	SPCC18.10	apc10	SPCC18.10	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.791050389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783251	2540307	2540960	276837	277476	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC3D6.02	apc10	but2	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582918766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783252	2540307	2540531	276837	277059	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC23E6.08	apc10	sat1	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.040690783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783253	2540307	2540935	276837	277451	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC359.04c	apc10	pfl7	SPBC1E8.06	SPBC359.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046096218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783254	2540307	2539013	276837	275586	SPBC1A4.01	SPCC364.03	apc10	rpl1702	SPBC1E8.06	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.414744887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783255	2540307	2541678	276837	278174	SPBC1A4.01	SPAP7G5.05	apc10	rpl1002	SPBC1E8.06	rpl10|rpl10-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.802797823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783256	2540307	2539136	276837	275708	SPBC1A4.01	SPCC1919.05	apc10	SPCC1919.05	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386081106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783257	2540307	2542418	276837	278881	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC1805.07c	apc10	dad2	SPBC1E8.06	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.166550756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783258	2540307	2539514	276837	276076	SPBC1A4.01	SPCC663.14c	apc10	trp663	SPBC1E8.06	SPCC663.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.034952038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783259	2540307	2542222	276837	278695	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC31G5.18c	apc10	sde2	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.935499617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783260	2540307	2543420	276837	279842	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC3H1.04c	apc10	mdm31	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.869872985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783261	2540307	2540992	276837	277508	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC342.05	apc10	crb2	SPBC1E8.06	rhp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.661726524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783262	2540307	2539928	276837	276472	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC1604.08c	apc10	imp1	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.519829235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783263	2540307	2539726	276837	276278	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC13E7.08c	apc10	leo1	SPBC1E8.06	SPBC13E7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.728164062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783264	2540307	2538840	276837	275421	SPBC1A4.01	SPCC736.07c	apc10	SPCC736.07c	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.080062012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783265	2540307	2539189	276837	275760	SPBC1A4.01	SPCC1682.16	apc10	rpt4	SPBC1E8.06	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.441028829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783266	2540307	2542021	276837	278504	SPBC1A4.01	SPAP14E8.02	apc10	tos4	SPBC1E8.06	SPAP14E8.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.829859801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783267	2540307	2539700	276837	276253	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC1685.15c	apc10	klp6	SPBC1E8.06	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.45923646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783268	2540307	2543387	276837	279809	SPBC1A4.01	SPAPB1E7.02c	apc10	mcl1	SPBC1E8.06	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.324505918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783269	2540307	2541472	276837	277974	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC589.11	apc10	pth4	SPBC1E8.06	mug82	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.465021433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783270	2540307	2542424	276837	278886	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC1805.14	apc10	SPAC1805.14	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.443716177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783271	2540307	2541050	276837	277565	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC428.05c	apc10	arg12	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.870166546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783272	2540307	2541502	276837	278004	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC23D3.04c	apc10	gpd2	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.048610697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783273	2540307	2541272	276837	277786	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC947.03c	apc10	naa38	SPBC1E8.06	mak31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.395178657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783274	2540307	2539001	276837	275575	SPBC1A4.01	SPCC1494.08c	apc10	SPCC1494.08c	SPBC1E8.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.666313552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783275	2540307	2542609	276837	279063	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC31G5.04	apc10	lys12	SPBC1E8.06	SPAC31G5.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.350699762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783276	2543036	2540342	279471	276871	SPAC3A12.03c	SPBC2G2.01c	meu34	liz1	mug145	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.62392322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783277	2539920	2539050	276464	275623	SPBC119.08	SPCC11E10.08	pmk1	rik1	spm1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932038094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783278	2539920	2539147	276464	275719	SPBC119.08	SPCC622.12c	pmk1	gdh1	spm1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.497224612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783279	2539920	2542577	276464	279033	SPBC119.08	SPAC19G12.15c	pmk1	tpp1	spm1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.85163465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783280	2539920	2543529	276464	279947	SPBC119.08	SPAC4C5.02c	pmk1	ryh1	spm1	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.345837707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783281	2539920	2542598	276464	279052	SPBC119.08	SPAC6G10.08	pmk1	idp1	spm1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.19482855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783282	2539920	2542372	276464	278836	SPBC119.08	SPAC1F3.03	pmk1	SPAC1F3.03	spm1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442789973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783283	2539920	2542293	276464	278761	SPBC119.08	SPAC17G8.14c	pmk1	pck1	spm1	SPAC22H10.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.505915849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783284	2539920	2541633	276464	278129	SPBC119.08	SPAC664.01c	pmk1	swi6	spm1	SPAC824.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.078903288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783285	2539920	2543432	276464	279852	SPBC119.08	SPAC4G8.05	pmk1	ppk14	spm1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.474411879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783286	2539920	2538976	276464	275550	SPBC119.08	SPCC1840.04	pmk1	pca1	spm1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.829332794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783287	2539920	2539420	276464	275985	SPBC119.08	SPCC970.07c	pmk1	raf2	spm1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.079224643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783288	2539920	2542273	276464	278742	SPBC119.08	SPAC17H9.13c	pmk1	SPAC17H9.13c	spm1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.303201198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783289	2539920	2540029	276464	276573	SPBC119.08	SPBC16A3.01	pmk1	spn3	spm1	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.931921571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783290	2539920	2542669	276464	279122	SPBC119.08	SPAC29B12.08	pmk1	clr5	spm1	SPAC29B12.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842876049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783291	2539920	2542689	276464	279142	SPBC119.08	SPAC29B12.04	pmk1	snz1	spm1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867795509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783292	2539920	2542724	276464	279175	SPBC119.08	SPAC767.01c	pmk1	vps1	spm1	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.333692098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783293	2539920	2543453	276464	279873	SPBC119.08	SPAC3G9.03	pmk1	rpl2301	spm1	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.013325349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783294	2539920	2542022	276464	278505	SPBC119.08	SPAC23A1.03	pmk1	apt1	spm1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449859669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783295	2539920	2542318	276464	278784	SPBC119.08	SPAC16C9.05	pmk1	cph1	spm1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.8049031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783296	2539920	2542023	276464	278506	SPBC119.08	SPAC20H4.10	pmk1	ufd2	spm1	SPAC145.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.51501789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783297	2539920	2543641	276464	280055	SPBC119.08	SPAC3H5.08c	pmk1	SPAC3H5.08c	spm1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978126781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783298	2539920	2539381	276464	275947	SPBC119.08	SPCC1739.10	pmk1	mug33	spm1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384586033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783299	2539920	2540964	276464	277480	SPBC119.08	SPBC365.16	pmk1	SPBC365.16	spm1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.749095893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783300	2539920	2542239	276464	278711	SPBC119.08	SPAC18G6.02c	pmk1	chp1	spm1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.947224528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783301	2539920	2539051	276464	275624	SPBC119.08	SPCC1183.11	pmk1	msy1	spm1	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377636994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783302	2539920	2541250	276464	277764	SPBC119.08	SPBC8D2.17	pmk1	gmh4	spm1	SPBC8D2.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.266067286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783303	2539920	2541776	276464	278270	SPBC119.08	SPAC23H3.05c	pmk1	swd1	spm1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045224968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783304	2539920	2541160	276464	277675	SPBC119.08	SPBC725.09c	pmk1	hob3	spm1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576543664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783305	2539920	2543412	276464	279834	SPBC119.08	SPAC637.07	pmk1	moe1	spm1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320753088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783306	2539920	2540673	276464	277198	SPBC119.08	SPBC1D7.03	pmk1	mug80	spm1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781532753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783307	2539920	2541889	276464	278379	SPBC119.08	SPAC2F7.03c	pmk1	pom1	spm1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.741123917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783308	2539920	2542168	276464	278643	SPBC119.08	SPAC17A5.16	pmk1	ftp105	spm1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.385137042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783309	2539920	2543396	276464	279818	SPBC119.08	SPAC4D7.11	pmk1	dsc4	spm1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.704961786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783310	2539920	2542032	276464	278514	SPBC119.08	SPAC23C11.04c	pmk1	pnk1	spm1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.343836673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783311	2539920	2540665	276464	277190	SPBC119.08	SPBC83.02c	pmk1	rpl4302	spm1	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.698154493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783312	2539920	2539974	276464	276518	SPBC119.08	SPBC32H8.07	pmk1	git5	spm1	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636749693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783313	2539920	2541720	276464	278214	SPBC119.08	SPAC23H3.13c	pmk1	gpa2	spm1	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.652082279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783314	2539920	2540836	276464	277354	SPBC119.08	SPBC18H10.19	pmk1	vps38	spm1	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.683060494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783315	2539920	2542549	276464	279006	SPBC119.08	SPAC19A8.11c	pmk1	SPAC19A8.11c	spm1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.764110313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783316	2539920	2539481	276464	276044	SPBC119.08	SPCC622.16c	pmk1	epe1	spm1	kdm2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934520692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783317	2539920	2541266	276464	277780	SPBC119.08	SPBP16F5.05c	pmk1	yar1	spm1	SPBP16F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.697433037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783318	2539920	2541186	276464	277700	SPBC119.08	SPBC725.01	pmk1	SPBC725.01	spm1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.871517724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783319	2539920	2538848	276464	275429	SPBC119.08	SPCC613.12c	pmk1	raf1	spm1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.901134948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783320	2539920	2539763	276464	276314	SPBC119.08	SPBC1861.05	pmk1	SPBC1861.05	spm1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.741496491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783321	2539920	2542170	276464	278645	SPBC119.08	SPAC17G8.13c	pmk1	mst2	spm1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.88862295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783322	2539920	2543663	276464	280077	SPBC119.08	SPAC644.07	pmk1	SPAC644.07	spm1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.102877089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783323	2539920	2538762	276464	275345	SPBC119.08	SPCC306.04c	pmk1	set1	spm1	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.772020758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783324	2539920	2539101	276464	275673	SPBC119.08	SPCC736.04c	pmk1	gma12	spm1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.024017578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783325	2539920	2541432	276464	277937	SPBC119.08	SPAC1F5.05c	pmk1	mso1	spm1	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.915698783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783326	2539920	2542386	276464	278850	SPBC119.08	SPAC1805.01c	pmk1	ppk6	spm1	SPAPJ736.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.929570014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783327	2539920	2543525	276464	279943	SPBC119.08	SPAC4A8.14	pmk1	SPAC4A8.14	spm1	prs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580087794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783328	2539920	2538792	276464	275373	SPBC119.08	SPCP1E11.10	pmk1	SPCP1E11.10	spm1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.655631902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783329	2539920	2539169	276464	275740	SPBC119.08	SPCC1235.11	pmk1	mpc1	spm1	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.71212414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783330	2539920	2543384	276464	279806	SPBC119.08	SPAC637.06	pmk1	gmh5	spm1	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.678443457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783331	2539920	2541806	276464	278297	SPBC119.08	SPAC4G8.13c	pmk1	prz1	spm1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.39348613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783332	2539920	2538920	276464	275497	SPBC119.08	SPCC1840.05c	pmk1	SPCC1840.05c	spm1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709484584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783333	2539920	2541062	276464	277577	SPBC119.08	SPBC660.11	pmk1	tcg1	spm1	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.162262449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783334	2541310	2540279	277822	276810	SPBP18G5.03	SPBC3B8.04c	toc1	SPBC3B8.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.951292762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783335	2541310	2541135	277822	277650	SPBP18G5.03	SPBC839.03c	toc1	SPBC839.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.080361773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783336	2541310	2543432	277822	279852	SPBP18G5.03	SPAC4G8.05	toc1	ppk14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.473570704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783337	2541310	2540491	277822	277019	SPBP18G5.03	SPBC28E12.04	toc1	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.121936205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783338	2541310	2541951	277822	278438	SPBP18G5.03	SPAC222.05c	toc1	mss1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.819292054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783339	2541310	2541205	277822	277719	SPBP18G5.03	SPBC839.02	toc1	SPBC839.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.625797879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783340	2541310	2542318	277822	278784	SPBP18G5.03	SPAC16C9.05	toc1	cph1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.84553194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783341	2541310	2543615	277822	280029	SPBP18G5.03	SPAC4F8.08	toc1	mug114	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980449894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783342	2541310	2541379	277822	277890	SPBP18G5.03	SPBP8B7.27	toc1	mug30	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.945051844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783343	2541310	2539388	277822	275953	SPBP18G5.03	SPCC24B10.12	toc1	cgi121	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.034063896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783344	2541310	2542776	277822	279225	SPBP18G5.03	SPAC167.01	toc1	ire1	-	ppk4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.4535134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783345	2541310	2541704	277822	278199	SPBP18G5.03	SPAC1250.04c	toc1	atl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.871728258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783346	2541310	2538841	277822	275422	SPBP18G5.03	SPCC550.03c	toc1	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.694537515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783347	2541310	2541248	277822	277762	SPBP18G5.03	SPBC8D2.10c	toc1	rmt3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703982995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783348	2541310	2541488	277822	277990	SPBP18G5.03	SPAC227.17c	toc1	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390705597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783349	2541310	2539812	277822	276362	SPBP18G5.03	SPBC1347.02	toc1	fkbp39	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.162050862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783350	2541310	2539438	277822	276001	SPBP18G5.03	SPCC4B3.07	toc1	nro1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.766091662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783351	2541310	2540061	277822	276599	SPBP18G5.03	SPBC119.12	toc1	rud3	-	SPBC119.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985804586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783352	2541310	2543662	277822	280076	SPBP18G5.03	SPAC9.07c	toc1	SPAC9.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.30063221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783353	2541310	2542418	277822	278881	SPBP18G5.03	SPAC1805.07c	toc1	dad2	-	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930692005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783354	2541310	2543516	277822	279934	SPBP18G5.03	SPAC4F10.11	toc1	spn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.789892934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783355	2541310	2539726	277822	276278	SPBP18G5.03	SPBC13E7.08c	toc1	leo1	-	SPBC13E7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.854367894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783356	2541310	2541151	277822	277666	SPBP18G5.03	SPBC713.03	toc1	SPBC713.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820109719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783357	2541310	2541357	277822	277868	SPBP18G5.03	SPBPB7E8.01	toc1	SPBPB7E8.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.131717153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783358	2541310	2541806	277822	278297	SPBP18G5.03	SPAC4G8.13c	toc1	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636046296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783359	2541310	2539743	277822	276295	SPBP18G5.03	SPBC16A3.08c	toc1	oga1	-	SPBC16A3.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.644644468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783360	2541310	2541869	277822	278359	SPBP18G5.03	SPAC22F3.13	toc1	tsc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.342986243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783361	2541310	2541177	277822	277691	SPBP18G5.03	SPBC725.05c	toc1	SPBC725.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.345133551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783362	2541310	2540320	277822	276850	SPBP18G5.03	SPBC3D6.04c	toc1	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379460831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783363	2541310	2543024	277822	279460	SPBP18G5.03	SPAC1039.02	toc1	SPAC1039.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581712539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783364	2539309	2542207	275876	278682	SPCC4G3.19	SPAC17H9.10c	alp16	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.357943807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783365	2539309	2540060	275876	276598	SPCC4G3.19	SPBC106.01	alp16	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.128840384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783366	2539309	2542577	275876	279033	SPCC4G3.19	SPAC19G12.15c	alp16	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.777258467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783367	2539309	2543637	275876	280051	SPCC4G3.19	SPAC3H8.02	alp16	csr102	-	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.043926679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783368	2539309	2542237	275876	278709	SPCC4G3.19	SPAC19E9.02	alp16	fin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.073523356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783369	2539309	3361561	275876	280637	SPCC4G3.19	SPAC11E3.01c	alp16	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.928326348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783370	2539309	2540296	275876	276827	SPCC4G3.19	SPBC2D10.05	alp16	exg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317212013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783371	2539309	2542701	275876	279154	SPCC4G3.19	SPAC26H5.05	alp16	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511376373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783372	2539309	2540664	275876	277189	SPCC4G3.19	SPBC215.02	alp16	bob1	-	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.835168199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783373	2539309	2539564	275876	276125	SPCC4G3.19	SPCC550.12	alp16	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.052665465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783374	2539309	2538906	275876	275483	SPCC4G3.19	SPCC1259.03	alp16	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392133717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783375	2539309	2538770	275876	275353	SPCC4G3.19	SPCC1753.02c	alp16	git3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636014448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783376	2539309	2541710	275876	278205	SPCC4G3.19	SPAC343.11c	alp16	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.474704906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783377	2539309	2540326	275876	276856	SPCC4G3.19	SPBC2G5.06c	alp16	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.001056047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783378	2539309	2539667	275876	276222	SPCC4G3.19	SPBC13G1.08c	alp16	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.532493837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783379	2539309	2539974	275876	276518	SPCC4G3.19	SPBC32H8.07	alp16	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.563095366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783380	2539309	2540394	275876	276922	SPCC4G3.19	SPBC2D10.09	alp16	snr1	-	SPBC2D10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815414827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783381	2539309	2543378	275876	279800	SPCC4G3.19	SPAC3H8.07c	alp16	pac10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.982137616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783382	2539309	2542439	275876	278901	SPCC4G3.19	SPAC17A5.08	alp16	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.436416409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783383	2539309	2540967	275876	277483	SPCC4G3.19	SPBC36B7.08c	alp16	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.741138623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783384	2539309	2542597	275876	279051	SPCC4G3.19	SPAP8A3.07c	alp16	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641656085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783385	2539309	2540229	275876	276761	SPCC4G3.19	SPBC31F10.15c	alp16	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.90892177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783386	2539309	2541337	275876	277848	SPCC4G3.19	SPBP35G2.13c	alp16	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706447499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783387	2539309	2540589	275876	277115	SPCC4G3.19	SPBC20F10.06	alp16	mad2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.47148671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783388	2539309	3361520	275876	280596	SPCC4G3.19	SPAC1610.02c	alp16	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983464208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783389	2539309	2539555	275876	276116	SPCC4G3.19	SPCC4B3.08	alp16	lsg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.849037473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783390	2539309	2540498	275876	277026	SPCC4G3.19	SPBC27.02c	alp16	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.951577254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783391	2539309	2540800	275876	277319	SPCC4G3.19	SPBC409.20c	alp16	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4411498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783392	2539309	2543304	275876	279728	SPCC4G3.19	SPAC6B12.12	alp16	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.400756703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783393	2539309	2542418	275876	278881	SPCC4G3.19	SPAC1805.07c	alp16	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.037011162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783394	2539309	2539668	275876	276223	SPCC4G3.19	SPBC11B10.10c	alp16	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445999615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783395	2539309	2541115	275876	277630	SPCC4G3.19	SPBC660.07	alp16	ntp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.396694118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783396	2539309	2539700	275876	276253	SPCC4G3.19	SPBC1685.15c	alp16	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.242529666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783397	2538710	2538801	275294	275382	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC285.13c	xap5	nup60	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514621686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783398	2538710	2540893	275294	277409	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC543.10	xap5	get1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.476849019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783399	2538710	2539481	275294	276044	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC622.16c	xap5	epe1	SPCC14G10.06	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.533134151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783400	2538710	2539108	275294	275680	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC1223.02	xap5	nmt1	SPCC14G10.06	thi3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.120441729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783401	2538710	2539925	275294	276469	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC16H5.13	xap5	SPBC16H5.13	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.890993181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783402	2539410	2542207	275975	278682	SPCC4G3.17	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC4G3.17	ddb1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.019561564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783403	2539410	2543637	275975	280051	SPCC4G3.17	SPAC3H8.02	SPCC4G3.17	csr102	-	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.155917037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783404	2539410	2539008	275975	275581	SPCC4G3.17	SPCC584.03c	SPCC4G3.17	SPCC584.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.573179685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783405	2539410	2541297	275975	277809	SPCC4G3.17	SPBC9B6.07	SPCC4G3.17	nop52	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981930858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783406	2541885	2539584	278375	276143	SPAC22H10.03c	SPCC63.03	kap114	SPCC63.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038986035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783407	2541885	2540060	278375	276598	SPAC22H10.03c	SPBC106.01	kap114	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923283552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783408	2541885	2543064	278375	279497	SPAC22H10.03c	SPAC3G6.01	kap114	hrp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.327837805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783409	2541885	2541117	278375	277632	SPAC22H10.03c	SPBC646.13	kap114	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783745432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783410	2541885	2541323	278375	277835	SPAC22H10.03c	SPBP35G2.14	kap114	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391346596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783411	2541885	2543108	278375	279540	SPAC22H10.03c	SPAC3A12.13c	kap114	SPAC3A12.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.920984471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783412	2541885	2543020	278375	279456	SPAC22H10.03c	SPAC10F6.13c	kap114	SPAC10F6.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.919717033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783413	2541885	2542652	278375	279106	SPAC22H10.03c	SPAC1687.15	kap114	gsk3	-	skp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.889001746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783414	2541885	2540886	278375	277403	SPAC22H10.03c	SPBC4F6.10	kap114	vps901	-	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.318944632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783415	2541885	2539974	278375	276518	SPAC22H10.03c	SPBC32H8.07	kap114	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.064603062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783416	2541885	2540394	278375	276922	SPAC22H10.03c	SPBC2D10.09	kap114	snr1	-	SPBC2D10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.569220001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783417	2541885	2541900	278375	278390	SPAC22H10.03c	SPAC23H4.17c	kap114	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.874921612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783418	2541885	2542597	278375	279051	SPAC22H10.03c	SPAP8A3.07c	kap114	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.202989554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783419	2541885	2540599	278375	277125	SPAC22H10.03c	SPBC29A3.10c	kap114	atp14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935022401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783420	2541885	2541896	278375	278386	SPAC22H10.03c	SPAC23H4.16c	kap114	SPAC23H4.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.439035004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783421	2541885	2541175	278375	277689	SPAC22H10.03c	SPBC839.13c	kap114	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.437722992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783422	2541885	2539925	278375	276469	SPAC22H10.03c	SPBC16H5.13	kap114	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.593033099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783423	2541885	2540800	278375	277319	SPAC22H10.03c	SPBC409.20c	kap114	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.893663681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783424	2541885	2542940	278375	279381	SPAC22H10.03c	SPAC31A2.12	kap114	SPAC31A2.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714783781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783425	2541885	2542222	278375	278695	SPAC22H10.03c	SPAC31G5.18c	kap114	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576019204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783426	2541885	2542826	278375	279273	SPAC22H10.03c	SPAC13G6.09	kap114	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994638161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783427	2541885	3361511	278375	280587	SPAC22H10.03c	SPAC23C4.08	kap114	rho3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814770014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783428	2541885	2539375	278375	275941	SPAC22H10.03c	SPCC4G3.11	kap114	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.625678527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783429	2541885	2540551	278375	277078	SPAC22H10.03c	SPBC23E6.01c	kap114	cxr1	-	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934582584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783430	2539375	2542207	275941	278682	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC17H9.10c	mug154	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.396570055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783431	2539375	2539050	275941	275623	SPCC4G3.11	SPCC11E10.08	mug154	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389644013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783432	2539375	2543565	275941	279981	SPCC4G3.11	SPAPB24D3.04c	mug154	mag1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.802063178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783433	2539375	2542895	275941	279339	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC13G6.10c	mug154	asl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326567464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783434	2539375	2540885	275941	277402	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC660.14	mug154	mik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.012556952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783435	2539375	2542518	275941	278976	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC1B3.16c	mug154	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769795165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783436	2539375	2543637	275941	280051	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC3H8.02	mug154	csr102	-	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.218449666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783437	2539375	2543634	275941	280048	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC3H8.04	mug154	SPAC3H8.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816013591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783438	2539375	2542143	275941	278619	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC17C9.07	mug154	alg8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.393806136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783439	2539375	2541512	275941	278013	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC11E3.08c	mug154	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.908685099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783440	2539375	2542066	275941	278543	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC227.05	mug154	SPAC227.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.835072266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783441	2539375	2541912	275941	278402	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC222.16c	mug154	csn3	-	SPAC821.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.588129679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783442	2539375	2543291	275941	279716	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC9E9.04	mug154	SPAC9E9.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.97855727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783443	2539375	2541818	275941	278309	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC11G7.02	mug154	pub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.249141254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783444	2539375	2539965	275941	276509	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC1685.14c	mug154	SPBC1685.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.263882466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783445	2539375	2542358	275941	278823	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC1782.09c	mug154	clp1	-	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.664839892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783446	2539375	2542378	275941	278842	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC1805.04	mug154	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.476111657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783447	2539375	2540528	275941	277056	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC18H10.04c	mug154	sce3	-	tif48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.804585019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783448	2539375	2539930	275941	276474	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC1198.11c	mug154	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.618357142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783449	2539375	2539008	275941	275581	SPCC4G3.11	SPCC584.03c	mug154	SPCC584.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.815736463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783450	2539375	2541438	275941	277943	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC23G3.10c	mug154	ssr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.806373121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783451	2539375	2543559	275941	279975	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC664.04c	mug154	rps1602	-	rps16|rps16-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.93816471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783452	2539375	2541117	275941	277632	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC646.13	mug154	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852860781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783453	2539375	2543434	275941	279854	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC8F11.02c	mug154	dph3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.969351828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783454	2539375	2540686	275941	277211	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC21D10.10	mug154	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.496295608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783455	2539375	2539890	275941	276436	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC16C6.03c	mug154	SPBC16C6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.089666212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783456	2539375	2540717	275941	277240	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC577.12	mug154	dph6	-	mug71	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.499272124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783457	2539375	2542613	275941	279067	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC18B11.03c	mug154	SPAC18B11.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.615932844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783458	2539375	2540664	275941	277189	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC215.02	mug154	bob1	-	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.506398448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783459	2539375	2541361	275941	277872	SPCC4G3.11	SPBP8B7.10c	mug154	utp16	-	SPBP8B7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.294447485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783460	2539375	2540975	275941	277491	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC354.12	mug154	gpd3	-	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.883495453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783461	2539375	2542677	275941	279130	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC26F1.10c	mug154	pyp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.841203452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783462	2539375	2540979	275941	277495	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC3H7.10	mug154	elp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.452117469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783463	2539375	2538775	275941	275357	SPCC4G3.11	SPCC23B6.05c	mug154	ssb3	-	rpa3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.024644217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783464	2539375	2542816	275941	279263	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC4G8.11c	mug154	atp10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039959053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783465	2539375	2541682	275941	278178	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC15F9.02	mug154	seh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503985735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783466	2539375	2538801	275941	275382	SPCC4G3.11	SPCC285.13c	mug154	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.660571118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783467	2539375	2542848	275941	279294	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC9G1.03c	mug154	rpl3001	-	rpl30|rpl30-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.117473307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783468	2539375	2543453	275941	279873	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC3G9.03	mug154	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.021567033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783469	2539375	2540220	275941	276753	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC337.03	mug154	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.592881786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783470	2539375	2540929	275941	277445	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC354.03	mug154	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634721639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783471	2539375	2539937	275941	276481	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC1539.08	mug154	arf6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.10269059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783472	2539375	2542012	275941	278495	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC23C11.02c	mug154	rps23	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.607705209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783473	2539375	2540727	275941	277250	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC1921.03c	mug154	mex67	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.369709896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783474	2539375	2542318	275941	278784	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC16C9.05	mug154	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.03307164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783475	2539375	2543685	275941	280099	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC3C7.03c	mug154	rad55	-	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.83276117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783476	2539375	2540851	275941	277368	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC4F6.04	mug154	rpl2502	-	rpl23a-2|rpl25b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.313239856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783477	2539375	2541580	275941	278077	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC1687.05	mug154	pli1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.938362249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783478	2539375	2539129	275941	275701	SPCC4G3.11	SPCC338.14	mug154	ado1	-	SPCC338.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638395784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783479	2539375	2543108	275941	279540	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC3A12.13c	mug154	SPAC3A12.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.488400297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783480	2539375	2543584	275941	279999	SPCC4G3.11	SPAPB1E7.11c	mug154	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.397493669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783481	2539375	2543426	275941	279846	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC631.02	mug154	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.328744148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783482	2539375	2539352	275941	275918	SPCC4G3.11	SPCC188.07	mug154	ccq1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.081465425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783483	2539375	2542530	275941	278988	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC1399.02	mug154	SPAC1399.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149105962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783484	2539375	2543319	275941	279743	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC6B12.09	mug154	trm10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701614847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783485	2539375	2538906	275941	275483	SPCC4G3.11	SPCC1259.03	mug154	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.502288756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783486	2539375	2542568	275941	279024	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC1952.02	mug154	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.49540126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783487	2539375	2542268	275941	278737	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC17A5.07c	mug154	ulp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576262602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783488	2539375	2542036	275941	278518	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC23A1.19c	mug154	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.588545137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783489	2539375	2541885	275941	278375	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC22H10.03c	mug154	kap114	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.625678527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783490	2539375	2541649	275941	278145	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC1F3.06c	mug154	spo15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.188551362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783491	2539375	2540797	275941	277316	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC18H10.11c	mug154	ppr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.342949678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783492	2539375	2541776	275941	278270	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC23H3.05c	mug154	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.939213923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783493	2539375	2540192	275941	276725	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC1215.01	mug154	shy1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814303494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783494	2539375	2539845	275941	276393	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC12C2.02c	mug154	ste20	-	ste16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.714898388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783495	2539375	2543445	275941	279865	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC4F10.13c	mug154	mpd2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.345501472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783496	2539375	2538770	275941	275353	SPCC4G3.11	SPCC1753.02c	mug154	git3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.815719803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783497	2539375	2540429	275941	276957	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC29A10.07	mug154	pom152	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.868336383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783498	2539375	2538706	275941	275290	SPCC4G3.11	SPCC338.08	mug154	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.615524683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783499	2539375	2539733	275941	276285	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC16E9.12c	mug154	pab2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.242601684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783500	2539375	2540673	275941	277198	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC1D7.03	mug154	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.744288091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783501	2539375	2538800	275941	275381	SPCC4G3.11	SPCC1322.06	mug154	kap113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.130787692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783502	2539375	2543208	275941	279637	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC328.04	mug154	SPAC328.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.184031126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783503	2539375	2540886	275941	277403	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC4F6.10	mug154	vps901	-	vps9a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.204403329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783504	2539375	2542817	275941	279264	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC13G6.02c	mug154	rps101	-	rps1-1|rps3a-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.621705288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783505	2539375	2542469	275941	278930	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC19A8.04	mug154	erg5	-	cyp61	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.296978538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783506	2539375	2539999	275941	276543	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC1734.15	mug154	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.901039825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783507	2539375	2539603	275941	276161	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC1289.06c	mug154	ppr8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.459862403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783508	2539375	2541413	275941	277921	SPCC4G3.11	SPBPJ4664.06	mug154	gpt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.407174154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783509	2539375	2541739	275941	278233	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC2G11.10c	mug154	SPAC2G11.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641969434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783510	2539375	2543406	275941	279828	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC9.12c	mug154	atp12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098918917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783511	2539375	2539667	275941	276222	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC13G1.08c	mug154	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.477081913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783512	2539375	2540665	275941	277190	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC83.02c	mug154	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.989712971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783513	2539375	2543244	275941	279672	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC6B12.06c	mug154	rrg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.538666793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783514	2539375	2538841	275941	275422	SPCC4G3.11	SPCC550.03c	mug154	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.050157806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783515	2539375	2542254	275941	278724	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC30D11.04c	mug154	nup124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.323521755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783516	2539375	2542519	275941	278977	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC19G12.08	mug154	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.336430047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783517	2539375	5802861	275941	857999	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC1D4.01	mug154	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.326811121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783518	2539375	2542056	275941	278535	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC6G9.14	mug154	SPAC6G9.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.262972504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783519	2539375	2539715	275941	276268	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC1778.09	mug154	SPBC1778.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707527356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783520	2539375	2541954	275941	278441	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC23C4.05c	mug154	SPAC23C4.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704582613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783521	2539375	2543443	275941	279863	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC3H1.12c	mug154	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505636324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783522	2539375	2541536	275941	278036	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC1071.02	mug154	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317504169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783523	2539375	2541708	275941	278203	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC31A2.02	mug154	trm112	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.223751279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783524	2539375	2540342	275941	276871	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC2G2.01c	mug154	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.156044922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783525	2539375	2540180	275941	276713	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC16D10.11c	mug154	rps1801	-	rps18-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.003438061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783526	2539375	2540599	275941	277125	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC29A3.10c	mug154	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197300957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783527	2539375	2541266	275941	277780	SPCC4G3.11	SPBP16F5.05c	mug154	yar1	-	SPBP16F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.417396777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783528	2539375	2540533	275941	277061	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC29A10.16c	mug154	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.466006581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783529	2539375	2541614	275941	278111	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC29A4.20	mug154	elp3	-	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.985855681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783530	2539375	2539711	275941	276264	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC1683.09c	mug154	frp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098342425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783531	2539375	2541680	275941	278176	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC22F8.09	mug154	rrp16	-	nop53	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504789255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783532	2539375	2542255	275941	278725	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC57A7.08	mug154	pzh1	-	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.973978956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783533	2539375	2539812	275941	276362	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC1347.02	mug154	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.208354415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783534	2539375	2539527	275941	276089	SPCC4G3.11	SPCC338.16	mug154	pof3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.973138834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783535	2539375	2543139	275941	279571	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC12G12.03	mug154	cip2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19976299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783536	2539375	2540930	275941	277446	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC354.10	mug154	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.153091323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783537	2539375	2542973	275941	279412	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC10F6.04	mug154	SPAC10F6.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.122165329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783538	2539375	2541017	275941	277532	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC36.07	mug154	elp1	-	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.015013706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783539	2539375	2540946	275941	277462	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC36.04	mug154	cys11	-	cys1a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.234098096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783540	2539375	2541144	275941	277659	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC685.06	mug154	rps001	-	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.754017162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783541	2539375	2541713	275941	278208	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC3A12.12	mug154	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.248151822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783542	2539375	2540821	275941	277339	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC800.03	mug154	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.741838821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783543	2539375	2541786	275941	278278	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC22F3.08c	mug154	rok1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.01269216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783544	2539375	2543051	275941	279486	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC1071.08	mug154	rpp203	-	rla6|rpp2-3|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.510771593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783545	2539375	2540519	275941	277047	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC21C3.14c	mug154	SPBC21C3.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570788647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783546	2539375	2540619	275941	277145	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC25H2.15	mug154	SPBC25H2.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.195442534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783547	2539375	2541175	275941	277689	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC839.13c	mug154	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.14836899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783548	2539375	2543670	275941	280084	SPCC4G3.11	SPAPB1E7.06c	mug154	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.412549294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783549	2539375	2538761	275941	275344	SPCC4G3.11	SPCC622.02	mug154	SPCC622.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.518300976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783550	2539375	2540498	275941	277026	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC27.02c	mug154	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.365117322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783551	2539375	2543304	275941	279728	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC6B12.12	mug154	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.515447551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783552	2539375	2539246	275941	275816	SPCC4G3.11	SPCC18.13	mug154	SPCC18.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.603665972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783553	2539375	2542940	275941	279381	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC31A2.12	mug154	SPAC31A2.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.063759945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783554	2539375	2541358	275941	277869	SPCC4G3.11	SPBP4H10.16c	mug154	SPBP4H10.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990292476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783555	2539375	2540115	275941	276652	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC1778.02	mug154	rap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.521938587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783556	2539375	2541531	275941	278031	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC25A8.01c	mug154	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.869913334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783557	2539375	2541678	275941	278174	SPCC4G3.11	SPAP7G5.05	mug154	rpl1002	-	rpl10|rpl10-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.518092371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783558	2539375	2540829	275941	277347	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC800.09	mug154	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.072675705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783559	2539375	2542418	275941	278881	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC1805.07c	mug154	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.663568854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783560	2539375	2538692	275941	275277	SPCC4G3.11	SPCC162.04c	mug154	wtf13	-	wtf12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.560618362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783561	2539375	2542042	275941	278523	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC23A1.14c	mug154	SPAC23A1.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.705668035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783562	2539375	2541229	275941	277743	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC839.05c	mug154	rps1701	-	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.708539513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783563	2539375	2542826	275941	279273	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC13G6.09	mug154	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.631045889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783564	2539375	2543602	275941	280017	SPCC4G3.11	SPAPB1A11.04c	mug154	mca1	-	SPAPB1A11.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.466162392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783565	2539375	2540555	275941	277082	SPCC4G3.11	SPBP16F5.02	mug154	mcs2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.339085507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783566	2539375	2543633	275941	280047	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC3H8.05c	mug154	mms1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.112098708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783567	2539375	2539928	275941	276472	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC1604.08c	mug154	imp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.302406174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783568	2539375	2540333	275941	276863	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC21B10.07	mug154	SPBC21B10.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199332645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783569	2539375	2542904	275941	279348	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC144.11	mug154	rps1102	-	rps11|rps11-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.137049564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783570	2539375	2543056	275941	279490	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC3A11.04	mug154	SPAC3A11.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.990095156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783571	2539375	2540896	275941	277412	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC19C2.13c	mug154	ctu2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.982739351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783572	2539375	2543380	275941	279802	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC4G9.16c	mug154	rpl901	-	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.703173049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783573	2539375	2540146	275941	276683	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC17A3.06	mug154	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.196367941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783574	2539375	2543486	275941	279906	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC959.07	mug154	rps403	-	rps4|rps4-3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.11481544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783575	2539375	2539483	275941	276046	SPCC4G3.11	SPCC584.02	mug154	cuf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.541366635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783576	2539375	2541774	275941	278268	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC22E12.05c	mug154	rer1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.916308124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783577	2539375	2543387	275941	279809	SPCC4G3.11	SPAPB1E7.02c	mug154	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633828314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783578	2539375	2540314	275941	276844	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC2G5.03	mug154	ctu1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.11673192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783579	2539375	2542424	275941	278886	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC1805.14	mug154	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.435916678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783580	2539375	2539085	275941	275657	SPCC4G3.11	SPCC285.15c	mug154	rps2802	-	rps28|rps28-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.695638752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783581	2539375	2543644	275941	280058	SPCC4G3.11	SPAPB1A10.03	mug154	nxt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.631580672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783582	2539375	2543333	275941	279756	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC694.02	mug154	SPAC694.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.507877902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783583	2539375	2543448	275941	279868	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC3H5.07	mug154	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.011211593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783584	2539375	2542656	275941	279110	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC2E1P3.05c	mug154	SPAC2E1P3.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449643399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783585	2539375	2542094	275941	278571	SPCC4G3.11	SPAC29B12.06c	mug154	rcd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.247529013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783586	2539375	2540208	275941	276741	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC9B6.03	mug154	SPBC9B6.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820236781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783587	2539375	2540320	275941	276850	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC3D6.04c	mug154	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.754793057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783588	2539375	2538940	275941	275515	SPCC4G3.11	SPCC1620.07c	mug154	lnp1	-	SPCC1620.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.354147733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783589	2539375	2540649	275941	277174	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC19F8.08	mug154	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.350727271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783590	2538711	2541633	275295	278129	SPCC1281.02c	SPAC664.01c	spf30	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.737614445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783591	2538711	2539420	275295	275985	SPCC1281.02c	SPCC970.07c	spf30	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.060072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783592	2538711	2539510	275295	276072	SPCC1281.02c	SPCC4G3.04c	spf30	coq5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45150643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783593	2538711	2540595	275295	277121	SPCC1281.02c	SPBC21C3.02c	spf30	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.397038888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783594	2538711	2543426	275295	279846	SPCC1281.02c	SPAC631.02	spf30	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.456502813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783595	2538711	2540825	275295	277343	SPCC1281.02c	SPBC428.08c	spf30	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.149094697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783596	2538711	2539051	275295	275624	SPCC1281.02c	SPCC1183.11	spf30	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643756285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783597	2538711	2539952	275295	276496	SPCC1281.02c	SPBC1709.14	spf30	SPBC1709.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.857117787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783598	2538711	2540673	275295	277198	SPCC1281.02c	SPBC1D7.03	spf30	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.063419986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783599	2538711	2542420	275295	278883	SPCC1281.02c	SPAC19D5.03	spf30	cid1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.921359548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783600	2538711	2540452	275295	276980	SPCC1281.02c	SPBC2A9.11c	spf30	iss9	-	SPBC2A9.11c|SPBC2D10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.771127913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783601	2538711	2539667	275295	276222	SPCC1281.02c	SPBC13G1.08c	spf30	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.393036528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783602	2538711	2543301	275295	279726	SPCC1281.02c	SPAC977.17	spf30	SPAC977.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.984453833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783603	2538711	2539953	275295	276497	SPCC1281.02c	SPBC1709.11c	spf30	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.19687988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783604	2538711	2538848	275295	275429	SPCC1281.02c	SPCC613.12c	spf30	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.312736465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783605	2538711	3361520	275295	280596	SPCC1281.02c	SPAC1610.02c	spf30	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.412221882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783606	2538711	2538966	275295	275540	SPCC1281.02c	SPCC18.10	spf30	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.118611871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783607	2538711	2543437	275295	279857	SPCC1281.02c	SPAPB1A10.14	spf30	pof15	-	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.316719773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783608	2538711	2542716	275295	279169	SPCC1281.02c	SPAC25H1.07	spf30	emc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.93253408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783609	2538711	2541675	275295	278171	SPCC1281.02c	SPAC22F8.12c	spf30	shf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509720963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783610	2538711	2543277	275295	279705	SPCC1281.02c	SPAC1002.03c	spf30	gls2	-	gls2alpha	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876370401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783611	2538711	2543472	275295	279892	SPCC1281.02c	SPAC959.04c	spf30	omh6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819198392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783612	2538711	2541062	275295	277577	SPCC1281.02c	SPBC660.11	spf30	tcg1	-	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.337482943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783613	2542924	2538939	279365	275514	SPAC12B10.04	SPCC1672.04c	pby1	SPCC1672.04c	SPAC12B10.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444103635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783614	2542924	2539940	279365	276484	SPAC12B10.04	SPBC16A3.10	pby1	SPBC16A3.10	SPAC12B10.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.978839859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783615	2542924	2539201	279365	275772	SPAC12B10.04	SPCC188.09c	pby1	pfl4	SPAC12B10.04	SPCC188.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149827587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783616	2542924	2542613	279365	279067	SPAC12B10.04	SPAC18B11.03c	pby1	SPAC18B11.03c	SPAC12B10.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154008765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783617	2542924	2541313	279365	277825	SPAC12B10.04	SPBP26C9.02c	pby1	car1	SPAC12B10.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462430093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783618	2542924	2541019	279365	277534	SPAC12B10.04	SPBC3B8.07c	pby1	dsd1	SPAC12B10.04	SDCB3B8.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046016632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783619	2542924	2539564	279365	276125	SPAC12B10.04	SPCC550.12	pby1	arp6	SPAC12B10.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148803202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783620	2542924	2539575	279365	276135	SPAC12B10.04	SPCP20C8.02c	pby1	SPCP20C8.02c	SPAC12B10.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.266596496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783621	2542924	2539980	279365	276524	SPAC12B10.04	SPBC1773.14	pby1	arg7	SPAC12B10.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930740454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783622	2542924	2539478	279365	276041	SPAC12B10.04	SPCC550.07	pby1	SPCC550.07	SPAC12B10.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101184595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783623	2542924	2542214	279365	278688	SPAC12B10.04	SPACUNK4.11c	pby1	mpp6	SPAC12B10.04	SPACUNK4.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.192577713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783624	2542924	2539715	279365	276268	SPAC12B10.04	SPBC1778.09	pby1	SPBC1778.09	SPAC12B10.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513999568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783625	2542924	2540184	279365	276717	SPAC12B10.04	SPBC106.12c	pby1	SPBC106.12c	SPAC12B10.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037518401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783626	2542924	2540533	279365	277061	SPAC12B10.04	SPBC29A10.16c	pby1	SPBC29A10.16c	SPAC12B10.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386680094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783627	2542924	2540930	279365	277446	SPAC12B10.04	SPBC354.10	pby1	def1	SPAC12B10.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047553562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783628	2542924	2542453	279365	278914	SPAC12B10.04	SPAC186.01	pby1	pfl9	SPAC12B10.04	SPAC186.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.338594661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783629	2542924	2543193	279365	279622	SPAC12B10.04	SPAC3F10.11c	pby1	abc2	SPAC12B10.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.461525543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783630	2542924	2541628	279365	278124	SPAC12B10.04	SPAC110.02	pby1	pds5	SPAC12B10.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818343914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783631	2542924	3361389	279365	280465	SPAC12B10.04	SPAC977.13c	pby1	SPAC977.13c	SPAC12B10.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.710102161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783632	2542924	2541370	279365	277881	SPAC12B10.04	SPBP8B7.07c	pby1	set6	SPAC12B10.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87435492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783633	2542924	2543136	279365	279568	SPAC12B10.04	SPBC1348.07	pby1	SPBC1348.07	SPAC12B10.04	SPAC1348.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.14953601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783634	2542924	2542416	279365	278880	SPAC12B10.04	SPAC589.03c	pby1	SPAC589.03c	SPAC12B10.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820427658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783635	2542924	2540333	279365	276863	SPAC12B10.04	SPBC21B10.07	pby1	SPBC21B10.07	SPAC12B10.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990375884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783636	2542924	2540843	279365	277360	SPAC12B10.04	SPBC557.05	pby1	SPBC557.05	SPAC12B10.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814243667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783637	2542924	2542571	279365	279027	SPAC12B10.04	SPAC589.02c	pby1	med13	SPAC12B10.04	spTrap240|srb9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877210684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783638	2540551	2542598	277078	279052	SPBC23E6.01c	SPAC6G10.08	cxr1	idp1	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.396935057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783639	2540551	2542812	277078	279259	SPBC23E6.01c	SPAC6F6.01	cxr1	cch1	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.924307152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783640	2540551	2539165	277078	275736	SPBC23E6.01c	SPCC1281.04	cxr1	SPCC1281.04	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871701721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783641	2540551	2542237	277078	278709	SPBC23E6.01c	SPAC19E9.02	cxr1	fin1	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.191935551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783642	2540551	2542701	277078	279154	SPBC23E6.01c	SPAC26H5.05	cxr1	mga2	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	SPAC26H5.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.188004125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783643	2540551	2542677	277078	279130	SPBC23E6.01c	SPAC26F1.10c	cxr1	pyp1	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391998635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783644	2540551	2543542	277078	279959	SPBC23E6.01c	SPAC823.09c	cxr1	SPAC823.09c	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.940461942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783645	2540551	2540929	277078	277445	SPBC23E6.01c	SPBC354.03	cxr1	swd3	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.188610381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783646	2540551	2543563	277078	279979	SPBC23E6.01c	SPAC664.02c	cxr1	arp8	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.891536814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783647	2540551	2540964	277078	277480	SPBC23E6.01c	SPBC365.16	cxr1	SPBC365.16	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.882427979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783648	2540551	2539310	277078	275877	SPBC23E6.01c	SPCC285.17	cxr1	spp27	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	uaf30	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.944276352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783649	2540551	2539023	277078	275596	SPBC23E6.01c	SPCC594.05c	cxr1	spf1	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.623118936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783650	2540551	2542036	277078	278518	SPBC23E6.01c	SPAC23A1.19c	cxr1	hrq1	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.941173774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783651	2540551	2541885	277078	278375	SPBC23E6.01c	SPAC22H10.03c	cxr1	kap114	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934582584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783652	2540551	2541776	277078	278270	SPBC23E6.01c	SPAC23H3.05c	cxr1	swd1	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708582308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783653	2540551	2539845	277078	276393	SPBC23E6.01c	SPBC12C2.02c	cxr1	ste20	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.210832542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783654	2540551	2538770	277078	275353	SPBC23E6.01c	SPCC1753.02c	cxr1	git3	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.550306667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783655	2540551	2540150	277078	276687	SPBC23E6.01c	SPBC16E9.14c	cxr1	zrg17	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.06515991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783656	2540551	2542469	277078	278930	SPBC23E6.01c	SPAC19A8.04	cxr1	erg5	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	cyp61	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.669186381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783657	2540551	2540665	277078	277190	SPBC23E6.01c	SPBC83.02c	cxr1	rpl4302	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988333287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783658	2540551	2540997	277078	277513	SPBC23E6.01c	SPBC3H7.06c	cxr1	pof9	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.892476679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783659	2540551	2539974	277078	276518	SPBC23E6.01c	SPBC32H8.07	cxr1	git5	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.693997742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783660	2540551	2541720	277078	278214	SPBC23E6.01c	SPAC23H3.13c	cxr1	gpa2	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643733577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783661	2540551	2540019	277078	276563	SPBC23E6.01c	SPBC1685.01	cxr1	pmp1	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.785955196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783662	2540551	2542008	277078	278491	SPBC23E6.01c	SPAC2G11.07c	cxr1	ptc3	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.892011112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783663	2540551	2540533	277078	277061	SPBC23E6.01c	SPBC29A10.16c	cxr1	SPBC29A10.16c	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.665435403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783664	2540551	3361520	277078	280596	SPBC23E6.01c	SPAC1610.02c	cxr1	SPAC1610.02c	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.88541336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783665	2540551	2541713	277078	278208	SPBC23E6.01c	SPAC3A12.12	cxr1	atp11	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.589564381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783666	2540551	2538762	277078	275345	SPBC23E6.01c	SPCC306.04c	cxr1	set1	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.333495115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783667	2540551	2543619	277078	280033	SPBC23E6.01c	SPAC4F10.04	cxr1	ypa1	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.625571719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783668	2540551	2540936	277078	277452	SPBC23E6.01c	SPBC800.05c	cxr1	atb2	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704216175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783669	2540551	2539169	277078	275740	SPBC23E6.01c	SPCC1235.11	cxr1	mpc1	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	SPCC1235.11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038352601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783670	2540551	2541806	277078	278297	SPBC23E6.01c	SPAC4G8.13c	cxr1	prz1	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.416562382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783671	2540551	2541627	277078	278123	SPBC23E6.01c	SPAC1F5.08c	cxr1	yam8	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	ehs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.322957332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783672	2540551	2542175	277078	278650	SPBC23E6.01c	SPAC1F3.02c	cxr1	mkh1	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.246675275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783673	2540551	2540558	277078	277085	SPBC23E6.01c	SPBC2D10.17	cxr1	clr1	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.816043983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783674	2540551	2541478	277078	277980	SPBC23E6.01c	SPAC2F7.17	cxr1	mrf1	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.882046784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783675	2539658	2542677	276213	279130	SPBC1105.17	SPAC26F1.10c	cnp1	pyp1	sim2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.744024126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783676	2539658	2540599	276213	277125	SPBC1105.17	SPBC29A3.10c	cnp1	atp14	sim2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.023145693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783677	2540270	2539949	276801	276493	SPBC2G2.02	SPBC1703.04	syj1	mlh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.74935619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783678	2540270	2540913	276801	277429	SPBC2G2.02	SPBC56F2.08c	syj1	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.477339748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783679	2540270	2543064	276801	279497	SPBC2G2.02	SPAC3G6.01	syj1	hrp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.856600082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783680	2540270	2542671	276801	279124	SPBC2G2.02	SPAC824.09c	syj1	SPAC824.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.507668763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783681	2540270	2542831	276801	279278	SPBC2G2.02	SPAC20H4.08	syj1	whi2	-	SPAC20H4.08|SPAC145.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.132811894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783682	2540270	2542546	276801	279003	SPBC2G2.02	SPAC1399.05c	syj1	toe1	-	SPAC1399.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505952993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783683	2540270	2539510	276801	276072	SPBC2G2.02	SPCC4G3.04c	syj1	coq5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.377776747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783684	2540270	2542555	276801	279012	SPBC2G2.02	SPAC1952.06c	syj1	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.84835414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783685	2540270	2540425	276801	276953	SPBC2G2.02	SPBC27.06c	syj1	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.373104019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783686	2540270	2543375	276801	279797	SPBC2G2.02	SPAC3H1.08c	syj1	SPAC3H1.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.065533786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783687	2540270	2542522	276801	278980	SPBC2G2.02	SPAC19A8.03	syj1	ymr1	-	SPAC19A8.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.964984209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783688	2540270	2542329	276801	278795	SPBC2G2.02	SPAC9G1.10c	syj1	SPAC9G1.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.86950438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783689	2540270	2542781	276801	279230	SPBC2G2.02	SPAC57A10.12c	syj1	ura3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.310095079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783690	2540270	2543662	276801	280076	SPBC2G2.02	SPAC9.07c	syj1	SPAC9.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451130025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783691	2540270	2540699	276801	277223	SPBC2G2.02	SPBC800.08	syj1	gcd10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.371901593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783692	2540270	2543427	276801	279847	SPBC2G2.02	SPAPB1A10.15	syj1	arv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.277871041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783693	2540270	2539205	276801	275775	SPBC2G2.02	SPCC4B3.15	syj1	mid1	-	dmf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.444359125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783694	2540270	2540504	276801	277032	SPBC2G2.02	SPBC24C6.10c	syj1	dip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.857346411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783695	2540270	2543220	276801	279648	SPBC2G2.02	SPAPB21F2.02	syj1	SPAPB21F2.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.399835456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783696	2540270	2539959	276801	276503	SPBC2G2.02	SPBC1703.11	syj1	SPBC1703.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.710845243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783697	2540270	3361517	276801	280593	SPBC2G2.02	SPAP11E10.02c	syj1	mam3	-	SPAPB1A10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.571360451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783698	2540270	2543374	276801	279796	SPBC2G2.02	SPAPB1A10.08	syj1	SPAPB1A10.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704452692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783699	2540270	2542609	276801	279063	SPBC2G2.02	SPAC31G5.04	syj1	lys12	-	SPAC31G5.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.440758721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783700	2540146	2542072	276683	278549	SPBC17A3.06	SPAP32A8.03c	SPBC17A3.06	bop1	pi040	SPAP32A8.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.375971448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783701	2540146	2540060	276683	276598	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC106.01	SPBC17A3.06	mph1	pi040	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.157166597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783702	2540146	2541656	276683	278152	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC25H1.06	SPBC17A3.06	pcf3	pi040	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702705949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783703	2540146	2540913	276683	277429	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC56F2.08c	pi040	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.738379647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783704	2540146	2543306	276683	279730	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC56F8.14c	SPBC17A3.06	mug115	pi040	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983701206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783705	2540146	2543064	276683	279497	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC17A3.06	hrp3	pi040	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.938009249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783706	2540146	2541552	276683	278051	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC1142.08	SPBC17A3.06	fhl1	pi040	SPAC8C9.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.845919538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783707	2540146	2542378	276683	278842	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC1805.04	SPBC17A3.06	nup132	pi040	Nup133b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.166747657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783708	2540146	2543527	276683	279945	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC4C5.01	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC4C5.01	pi040	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.082833169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783709	2540146	2540491	276683	277019	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC28E12.04	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC28E12.04	pi040	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925181151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783710	2540146	2538806	276683	275387	SPBC17A3.06	SPCC1840.09	SPBC17A3.06	SPCC1840.09	pi040	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.339278051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783711	2540146	2541208	276683	277722	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC887.04c	SPBC17A3.06	lub1	pi040	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.550628797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783712	2540146	2540306	276683	276836	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC2G5.02c	SPBC17A3.06	ckb2	pi040	SPBC2G5.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.59182309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783713	2540146	2539117	276683	275689	SPBC17A3.06	SPCC74.06	SPBC17A3.06	mak3	pi040	phk2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.159562285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783714	2540146	2538833	276683	275414	SPBC17A3.06	SPCP1E11.11	SPBC17A3.06	puf6	pi040	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.853081115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783715	2540146	2540727	276683	277250	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC1921.03c	SPBC17A3.06	mex67	pi040	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383251174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783716	2540146	2543685	276683	280099	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC17A3.06	rad55	pi040	rhp55	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.88892923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783717	2540146	2543108	276683	279540	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC3A12.13c	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC3A12.13c	pi040	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928190559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783718	2540146	2543563	276683	279979	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC664.02c	SPBC17A3.06	arp8	pi040	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.141864281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783719	2540146	2542253	276683	278723	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC17H9.04c	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC17H9.04c	pi040	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.91998785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783720	2540146	2542036	276683	278518	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC17A3.06	hrq1	pi040	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.034994082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783721	2540146	2539098	276683	275670	SPBC17A3.06	SPCC24B10.18	SPBC17A3.06	SPCC24B10.18	pi040	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.598055216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783722	2540146	2542177	276683	278652	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC17H9.08	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC17H9.08	pi040	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871129694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783723	2540146	2541249	276683	277763	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC947.01	SPBC17A3.06	alf1	pi040	SPBC947.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.804768302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783724	2540146	2540892	276683	277408	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC530.01	SPBC17A3.06	gyp1	pi040	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.50200944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783725	2540146	2542513	276683	278971	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC1952.05	SPBC17A3.06	gcn5	pi040	kat2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.869509213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783726	2540146	2540922	276683	277438	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC36.10	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC36.10	pi040	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51392547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783727	2540146	2539733	276683	276285	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC17A3.06	pab2	pi040	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.768595459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783728	2540146	2541578	276683	278075	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC25B8.05	SPBC17A3.06	deg1	pi040	SPAC25B8.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864227687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783729	2540146	2541496	276683	277998	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC17A3.06	arp42	pi040	arp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.348785132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783730	2540146	2540772	276683	277292	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC216.04c	SPBC17A3.06	mxr2	pi040	SPBC216.04c|MsrB	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572043105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783731	2540146	2540831	276683	277349	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC428.02c	SPBC17A3.06	eca39	pi040	SPBC582.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145882004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783732	2540146	2541710	276683	278205	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC343.11c	SPBC17A3.06	msc1	pi040	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.269859494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783733	2540146	2541983	276683	278468	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC20G8.08c	SPBC17A3.06	fft1	pi040	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101680793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783734	2540146	2538873	276683	275452	SPBC17A3.06	SPCC306.11	SPBC17A3.06	SPCC306.11	pi040	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388103434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783735	2540146	2541241	276683	277755	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC887.17	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC887.17	pi040	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.871241222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783736	2540146	2543378	276683	279800	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC3H8.07c	SPBC17A3.06	pac10	pi040	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036991133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783737	2540146	2541900	276683	278390	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC17A3.06	srb10	pi040	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.061370986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783738	2540146	2539408	276683	275973	SPBC17A3.06	SPCC576.12c	SPBC17A3.06	mhf2	pi040	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986926043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783739	2540146	2541009	276683	277524	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC428.04	SPBC17A3.06	apq12	pi040	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.893458535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783740	2540146	2541464	276683	277966	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC222.08c	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC222.08c	pi040	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.192386087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783741	2540146	2540967	276683	277483	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC36B7.08c	pi040	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.443158659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783742	2540146	2542597	276683	279051	SPBC17A3.06	SPAP8A3.07c	SPBC17A3.06	SPAP8A3.07c	pi040	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092844099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783743	2540146	2539847	276683	276395	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC530.14c	SPBC17A3.06	dsk1	pi040	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.649739908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783744	2540146	2540882	276683	277399	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC4F6.08c	SPBC17A3.06	mrpl39	pi040	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818378992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783745	2540146	2541614	276683	278111	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC17A3.06	elp3	pi040	kat9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.071035078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783746	2540146	2542329	276683	278795	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC9G1.10c	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC9G1.10c	pi040	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.802246776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783747	2540146	2542602	276683	279056	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC186.09	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC186.09	pi040	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386113474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783748	2540146	2540821	276683	277339	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC800.03	SPBC17A3.06	clr3	pi040	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.858237387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783749	2540146	2542806	276683	279254	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC1610.01	SPBC17A3.06	saf5	pi040	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808699551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783750	2540146	2541786	276683	278278	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC22F3.08c	SPBC17A3.06	rok1	pi040	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044704932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783751	2540146	2542401	276683	278865	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC1142.02c	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC1142.02c	pi040	SPAC17G6.19c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701060115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783752	2540146	2539925	276683	276469	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC16H5.13	pi040	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.62864444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783753	2540146	2543304	276683	279728	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC17A3.06	tom70	pi040	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.714721506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783754	2540146	2543136	276683	279568	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC1348.07	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC1348.07	pi040	SPAC1348.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86519927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783755	2540146	2541432	276683	277937	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC1F5.05c	SPBC17A3.06	mso1	pi040	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510108523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783756	2540146	2540725	276683	277248	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC215.14c	SPBC17A3.06	vps20	pi040	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.82053172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783757	2540146	2541789	276683	278281	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC17A3.06	iwr1	pi040	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.859516499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783758	2540146	2539207	276683	275777	SPBC17A3.06	SPCC285.09c	SPBC17A3.06	cgs2	pi040	pde1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323213788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783759	2540146	2543044	276683	279479	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC17A3.06	tip1	pi040	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.351260761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783760	2540146	2539205	276683	275775	SPBC17A3.06	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC17A3.06	mid1	pi040	dmf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.886060261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783761	2540146	2539375	276683	275941	SPBC17A3.06	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC17A3.06	mug154	pi040	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.196367941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783762	2540146	2541941	276683	278428	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC17A3.06	tfs1	pi040	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.128657187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783763	2540146	2542119	276683	278595	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC1834.08	SPBC17A3.06	mak1	pi040	phk3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.594965197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783764	2540146	2538861	276683	275441	SPBC17A3.06	SPCC1620.11	SPBC17A3.06	nup97	pi040	mug87	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.92416158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783765	2540146	2542716	276683	279169	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC25H1.07	SPBC17A3.06	emc1	pi040	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2679421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783766	2540146	2543384	276683	279806	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC637.06	SPBC17A3.06	gmh5	pi040	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871100602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783767	2540146	2543327	276683	279750	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC1D4.06c	SPBC17A3.06	csk1	pi040	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572005698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783768	2540146	2543087	276683	279520	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC30C2.04	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC30C2.04	pi040	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864138002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783769	2540146	2543076	276683	279509	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC30C2.07	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC30C2.07	pi040	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852560913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783770	2540146	2540828	276683	277346	SPBC17A3.06	SPBC4B4.06	SPBC17A3.06	vps25	pi040	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809576873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783771	2540146	2539588	276683	276146	SPBC17A3.06	SPCC962.04	SPBC17A3.06	rps1201	pi040	rps12|rps12-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813909439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783772	2540146	2541478	276683	277980	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC2F7.17	SPBC17A3.06	mrf1	pi040	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193028531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783773	2540146	2543372	276683	279794	SPBC17A3.06	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC17A3.06	ase1	pi040	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440035785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783774	2540146	2538947	276683	275521	SPBC17A3.06	SPCC1682.12c	SPBC17A3.06	ubp16	pi040	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818142647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783775	2540146	2543448	276683	279868	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC3H5.07	SPBC17A3.06	rpl702	pi040	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.264066504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783776	2540146	2542094	276683	278571	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC17A3.06	rcd1	pi040	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.346287686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783777	2540146	2542571	276683	279027	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC589.02c	SPBC17A3.06	med13	pi040	spTrap240|srb9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.692724551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783778	2540146	2538730	276683	275314	SPBC17A3.06	SPCC31H12.02c	SPBC17A3.06	mug73	pi040	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.561956356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783779	2540173	2538721	276706	275305	SPBC106.13	SPCC1494.10	SPBC106.13	adn3	-	SPCC70.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319771233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783780	2540173	2540068	276706	276606	SPBC106.13	SPBC1734.12c	SPBC106.13	alg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702487465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783781	2540173	2540664	276706	277189	SPBC106.13	SPBC215.02	SPBC106.13	bob1	-	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779323412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783782	2540173	2539420	276706	275985	SPBC106.13	SPCC970.07c	SPBC106.13	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.084777727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783783	2540173	2542273	276706	278742	SPBC106.13	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC106.13	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.938414558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783784	2540173	2540964	276706	277480	SPBC106.13	SPBC365.16	SPBC106.13	SPBC365.16	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809823308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783785	2540173	2542331	276706	278797	SPBC106.13	SPAC1834.05	SPBC106.13	alg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.50953862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783786	2540173	2542311	276706	278777	SPBC106.13	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC106.13	dad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.59375919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783787	2540173	2543020	276706	279456	SPBC106.13	SPAC10F6.13c	SPBC106.13	SPAC10F6.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.560641281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783788	2540173	2542177	276706	278652	SPBC106.13	SPAC17H9.08	SPBC106.13	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.464039268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783789	2540173	2542513	276706	278971	SPBC106.13	SPAC1952.05	SPBC106.13	gcn5	-	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.570374635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783790	2540173	2541545	276706	278045	SPBC106.13	SPAC22F8.07c	SPBC106.13	rtf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820721441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783791	2540173	2542168	276706	278643	SPBC106.13	SPAC17A5.16	SPBC106.13	ftp105	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189676268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783792	2540173	2541096	276706	277611	SPBC106.13	SPBC725.10	SPBC106.13	SPBC725.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152568523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783793	2540173	2543643	276706	280057	SPBC106.13	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC106.13	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.028195807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783794	2540173	2542597	276706	279051	SPBC106.13	SPAP8A3.07c	SPBC106.13	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.485170841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783795	2540173	2540229	276706	276761	SPBC106.13	SPBC31F10.15c	SPBC106.13	atp15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2740764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783796	2540173	2538848	276706	275429	SPBC106.13	SPCC613.12c	SPBC106.13	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931452044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783797	2540173	2543304	276706	279728	SPBC106.13	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC106.13	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.744580269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783798	2540173	2540787	276706	277306	SPBC106.13	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC106.13	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.430354364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783799	2542236	2541488	278708	277990	SPAC30D11.08c	SPAC227.17c	phf2	SPAC227.17c	saf60|swp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.344526009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783800	2542236	2541628	278708	278124	SPAC30D11.08c	SPAC110.02	phf2	pds5	saf60|swp2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09867515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783801	2542236	2543387	278708	279809	SPAC30D11.08c	SPAPB1E7.02c	phf2	mcl1	saf60|swp2	slr3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810527382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783802	2543676	2540150	280090	276687	SPAC9.03c	SPBC16E9.14c	brr2	zrg17	spp41	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.289731293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783803	2538765	2538801	275348	275382	SPCC548.04	SPCC285.13c	urm1	nup60	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193282969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783804	2538765	2542635	275348	279089	SPCC548.04	SPAC24H6.09	urm1	gef1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.542091049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783805	2541941	2539050	278428	275623	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC11E10.08	tfs1	rik1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.813191687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783806	2541941	2541562	278428	278061	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC24B11.05	tfs1	SPAC24B11.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810488772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783807	2541941	2540105	278428	276642	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC106.04	tfs1	ada1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.313425579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783808	2541941	2539156	278428	275728	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC1450.08c	tfs1	wtf16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783809	2541941	2540161	278428	276696	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC13E7.03c	tfs1	SPBC13E7.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865839463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783810	2541941	2538922	278428	275499	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC16C4.10	tfs1	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.67198076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783811	2541941	2539420	278428	275985	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC970.07c	tfs1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.349557597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783812	2541941	2538847	278428	275428	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC594.06c	tfs1	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.496849212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783813	2541941	2539434	278428	275997	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC757.09c	tfs1	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.884769572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783814	2541941	2541026	278428	277541	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC337.09	tfs1	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580435679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783815	2541941	2541119	278428	277634	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC651.11c	tfs1	apm3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.624034202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783816	2541941	2543584	278428	279999	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAPB1E7.11c	tfs1	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039123189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783817	2541941	2542981	278428	279419	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC824.02	tfs1	bst1	-	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.682042647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783818	2541941	2540825	278428	277343	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC428.08c	tfs1	clr4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.171711858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783819	2541941	2541250	278428	277764	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC8D2.17	tfs1	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873084077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783820	2541941	2541496	278428	277998	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC23D3.09	tfs1	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.178552345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783821	2541941	2539689	278428	276244	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC1861.03	tfs1	mak10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45971725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783822	2541941	2542857	278428	279303	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC144.06	tfs1	apl5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.698814195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783823	2541941	2542946	278428	279386	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC6F12.03c	tfs1	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.243470027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783824	2541941	2541900	278428	278390	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC23H4.17c	tfs1	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045511759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783825	2541941	2542398	278428	278862	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC1805.03c	tfs1	trm13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.360704267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783826	2541941	2541708	278428	278203	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC31A2.02	tfs1	trm112	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.181490037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783827	2541941	2541680	278428	278176	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC22F8.09	tfs1	rrp16	-	nop53	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868439931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783828	2541941	2539812	278428	276362	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC1347.02	tfs1	fkbp39	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.486348477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783829	2541941	2541378	278428	277889	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBP8B7.21	tfs1	ubp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.857040833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783830	2541941	2540930	278428	277446	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC354.10	tfs1	def1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932669332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783831	2541941	2539519	278428	276081	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC364.05	tfs1	vps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319900688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783832	2541941	2538848	278428	275429	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC613.12c	tfs1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.302544094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783833	2541941	2541175	278428	277689	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC839.13c	tfs1	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193091671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783834	2541941	2543670	278428	280084	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAPB1E7.06c	tfs1	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.654875325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783835	2541941	2540498	278428	277026	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC27.02c	tfs1	ask1	-	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199854987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783836	2541941	2540800	278428	277319	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC409.20c	tfs1	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.398530436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783837	2541941	2541432	278428	277937	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC1F5.05c	tfs1	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.814286913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783838	2541941	2540699	278428	277223	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC800.08	tfs1	gcd10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570411143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783839	2541941	2541789	278428	278281	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC23H4.08	tfs1	iwr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643837213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783840	2541941	2543633	278428	280047	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC3H8.05c	tfs1	mms1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.638706053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783841	2541941	2539726	278428	276278	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC13E7.08c	tfs1	leo1	-	SPBC13E7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.084267379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783842	2541941	2540146	278428	276683	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC17A3.06	tfs1	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.128657187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783843	2541941	2539178	278428	275749	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC1682.14	tfs1	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812600196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783844	2541941	2541806	278428	278297	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC4G8.13c	tfs1	prz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.343412821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783845	2541941	2543387	278428	279809	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAPB1E7.02c	tfs1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.167478798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783846	2541941	2543076	278428	279509	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC30C2.07	tfs1	SPAC30C2.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989892228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783847	2541941	2541491	278428	277993	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC2C4.16c	tfs1	rps801	-	rps8|rps8-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.203697258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783848	2541941	2540787	278428	277306	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC1921.07c	tfs1	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.763542652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783849	2540134	2538939	276671	275514	SPBC17A3.03c	SPCC1672.04c	SPBC17A3.03c	SPCC1672.04c	pi043	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.974472428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783850	2540134	2542577	276671	279033	SPBC17A3.03c	SPAC19G12.15c	SPBC17A3.03c	tpp1	pi043	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.340414331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783851	2540134	2542143	276671	278619	SPBC17A3.03c	SPAC17C9.07	SPBC17A3.03c	alg8	pi043	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639855673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783852	2540134	2540913	276671	277429	SPBC17A3.03c	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC17A3.03c	SPBC56F2.08c	pi043	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.204363569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783853	2540134	2539165	276671	275736	SPBC17A3.03c	SPCC1281.04	SPBC17A3.03c	SPCC1281.04	pi043	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.985346494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783854	2540134	2539463	276671	276026	SPBC17A3.03c	SPCC550.11	SPBC17A3.03c	SPCC550.11	pi043	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.25559567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783855	2540134	2543584	276671	279999	SPBC17A3.03c	SPAPB1E7.11c	SPBC17A3.03c	SPAPB1E7.11c	pi043	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440779304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783856	2540134	2542331	276671	278797	SPBC17A3.03c	SPAC1834.05	SPBC17A3.03c	alg9	pi043	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.686390041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783857	2540134	2542513	276671	278971	SPBC17A3.03c	SPAC1952.05	SPBC17A3.03c	gcn5	pi043	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.50533516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783858	2540134	2543412	276671	279834	SPBC17A3.03c	SPAC637.07	SPBC17A3.03c	moe1	pi043	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767585475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783859	2540134	2543245	276671	279673	SPBC17A3.03c	SPAC56F8.06c	SPBC17A3.03c	alg10	pi043	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51487602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783860	2540134	2540326	276671	276856	SPBC17A3.03c	SPBC2G5.06c	SPBC17A3.03c	hmt2	pi043	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.632316599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783861	2540134	2540256	276671	276787	SPBC17A3.03c	SPBC32F12.12c	SPBC17A3.03c	SPBC32F12.12c	pi043	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51397006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783862	2540134	2539408	276671	275973	SPBC17A3.03c	SPCC576.12c	SPBC17A3.03c	mhf2	pi043	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771005761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783863	2540134	2542439	276671	278901	SPBC17A3.03c	SPAC17A5.08	SPBC17A3.03c	erp2	pi043	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851566383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783864	2540134	2538708	276671	275292	SPBC17A3.03c	SPCC594.01	SPBC17A3.03c	SPCC594.01	pi043	SPCC736.16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.33866926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783865	2540134	2540229	276671	276761	SPBC17A3.03c	SPBC31F10.15c	SPBC17A3.03c	atp15	pi043	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.758539193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783866	2540134	2541488	276671	277990	SPBC17A3.03c	SPAC227.17c	SPBC17A3.03c	SPAC227.17c	pi043	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446780224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783867	2540134	2543670	276671	280084	SPBC17A3.03c	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC17A3.03c	eme1	pi043	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580351188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783868	2540134	2542881	276671	279326	SPBC17A3.03c	SPAC13F5.03c	SPBC17A3.03c	gld1	pi043	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.185623605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783869	2540134	2542515	276671	278973	SPBC17A3.03c	SPAC1952.09c	SPBC17A3.03c	SPAC1952.09c	pi043	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.04889823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783870	2540134	2542940	276671	279381	SPBC17A3.03c	SPAC31A2.12	SPBC17A3.03c	SPAC31A2.12	pi043	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.986688274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783871	2540134	2541432	276671	277937	SPBC17A3.03c	SPAC1F5.05c	SPBC17A3.03c	mso1	pi043	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.198208049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783872	2540134	2542244	276671	278714	SPBC17A3.03c	SPAC19G12.13c	SPBC17A3.03c	poz1	pi043	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814421699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783873	2540134	2542890	276671	279334	SPBC17A3.03c	SPAC13G6.14	SPBC17A3.03c	aps1	pi043	SPAC24B11.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.003591565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783874	2541120	2541512	277635	278013	SPBC649.03	SPAC11E3.08c	rhp14	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.139815942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783875	2541120	2541818	277635	278309	SPBC649.03	SPAC11G7.02	rhp14	pub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.18879486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783876	2541120	2538896	277635	275474	SPBC649.03	SPCC584.11c	rhp14	SPCC584.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.253737365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783877	2541120	2540161	277635	276696	SPBC649.03	SPBC13E7.03c	rhp14	SPBC13E7.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.679329331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783878	2541120	2539201	277635	275772	SPBC649.03	SPCC188.09c	rhp14	pfl4	-	SPCC188.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.271341697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783879	2541120	2542613	277635	279067	SPBC649.03	SPAC18B11.03c	rhp14	SPAC18B11.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.268618228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783880	2541120	2543320	277635	279744	SPBC649.03	SPAPJ695.01c	rhp14	SPAPJ695.01c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.258986014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783881	2541120	2539210	277635	275780	SPBC649.03	SPCC2H8.05c	rhp14	dbl1	-	SPCC2H8.05c|SPCC63.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.770051032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783882	2541120	2538775	277635	275357	SPBC649.03	SPCC23B6.05c	rhp14	ssb3	-	rpa3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.973922236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783883	2541120	2541669	277635	278165	SPBC649.03	SPAC22G7.07c	rhp14	ime4	-	SPAC22G7.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574377458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783884	2541120	2540993	277635	277509	SPBC649.03	SPBC342.01c	rhp14	alg6	-	SPBC3F6.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987585957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783885	2541120	2542318	277635	278784	SPBC649.03	SPAC16C9.05	rhp14	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.198067298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783886	2541120	2540595	277635	277121	SPBC649.03	SPBC21C3.02c	rhp14	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.504197336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783887	2541120	2542558	277635	279014	SPBC649.03	SPAC1952.07	rhp14	rad1	-	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.543684849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783888	2541120	2542177	277635	278652	SPBC649.03	SPAC17H9.08	rhp14	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.270303985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783889	2541120	2539473	277635	276036	SPBC649.03	SPCP25A2.02c	rhp14	rhp26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704112242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783890	2541120	2542652	277635	279106	SPBC649.03	SPAC1687.15	rhp14	gsk3	-	skp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098277382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783891	2541120	2540348	277635	276877	SPBC649.03	SPBC29A10.05	rhp14	exo1	-	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.350612255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783892	2541120	2540338	277635	276867	SPBC649.03	SPBC2G2.13c	rhp14	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.213564332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783893	2541120	2538706	277635	275290	SPBC649.03	SPCC338.08	rhp14	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.697018224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783894	2541120	2543412	277635	279834	SPBC649.03	SPAC637.07	rhp14	moe1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.414863581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783895	2541120	2540396	277635	276924	SPBC649.03	SPBC31F10.12	rhp14	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808973827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783896	2541120	2539999	277635	276543	SPBC649.03	SPBC1734.15	rhp14	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.069200037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783897	2541120	2540452	277635	276980	SPBC649.03	SPBC2A9.11c	rhp14	iss9	-	SPBC2A9.11c|SPBC2D10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635932243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783898	2541120	2542007	277635	278490	SPBC649.03	SPAC20H4.07	rhp14	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.564566085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783899	2541120	2542976	277635	279414	SPBC649.03	SPAC9E9.09c	rhp14	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.563162312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783900	2541120	2540836	277635	277354	SPBC649.03	SPBC18H10.19	rhp14	vps38	-	atg14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81744451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783901	2541120	2540599	277635	277125	SPBC649.03	SPBC29A3.10c	rhp14	atp14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87343018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783902	2541120	2541266	277635	277780	SPBC649.03	SPBP16F5.05c	rhp14	yar1	-	SPBP16F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876115913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783903	2541120	2542550	277635	279007	SPBC649.03	SPAC1B3.02c	rhp14	SPAC1B3.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318272608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783904	2541120	2542255	277635	278725	SPBC649.03	SPAC57A7.08	rhp14	pzh1	-	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571238388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783905	2541120	2541746	277635	278240	SPBC649.03	SPAC20G4.04c	rhp14	hus1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.826558958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783906	2541120	2539527	277635	276089	SPBC649.03	SPCC338.16	rhp14	pof3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.120191642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783907	2541120	2542869	277635	279314	SPBC649.03	SPAC140.02	rhp14	gar2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815968152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783908	2541120	2539763	277635	276314	SPBC649.03	SPBC1861.05	rhp14	SPBC1861.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639968849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783909	2541120	2539686	277635	276241	SPBC649.03	SPBC1734.06	rhp14	rhp18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.663720615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783910	2541120	2542327	277635	278793	SPBC649.03	SPAC16C9.06c	rhp14	upf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.76017831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783911	2541120	2540523	277635	277051	SPBC649.03	SPBC29A10.10c	rhp14	dbl8	-	SPBC29A10.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.877794391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783912	2541120	2540992	277635	277508	SPBC649.03	SPBC342.05	rhp14	crb2	-	rhp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.203225218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783913	2541120	2541941	277635	278428	SPBC649.03	SPAC20H4.03c	rhp14	tfs1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148122659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783914	2541120	2543384	277635	279806	SPBC649.03	SPAC637.06	rhp14	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808631407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783915	2541120	2543387	277635	279809	SPBC649.03	SPAPB1E7.02c	rhp14	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.202620877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783916	2541120	2543327	277635	279750	SPBC649.03	SPAC1D4.06c	rhp14	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.496940629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783917	2541120	2538981	277635	275555	SPBC649.03	SPCC330.06c	rhp14	pmp20	-	SPCC330.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932343905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783918	2541120	2540309	277635	276839	SPBC649.03	SPBC21B10.13c	rhp14	yox1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391521644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783919	2541120	2542094	277635	278571	SPBC649.03	SPAC29B12.06c	rhp14	rcd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.078123658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783920	2541120	2542879	277635	279324	SPBC649.03	SPAC13G7.07	rhp14	arb2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382638037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783921	2541120	2539001	277635	275575	SPBC649.03	SPCC1494.08c	rhp14	SPCC1494.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.765225354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783922	2539730	2542585	276282	279040	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC31A2.13c	lea1	sft1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.552726858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783923	2539730	2542701	276282	279154	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC26H5.05	lea1	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775439797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783924	2539730	2540797	276282	277316	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC18H10.11c	lea1	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451652566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783925	2539730	2542710	276282	279163	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC750.08c	lea1	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776563197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783926	2539730	2540990	276282	277506	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC36B7.06c	lea1	mug20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.508878406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783927	2539730	2543472	276282	279892	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC959.04c	lea1	omh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326288608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783928	2542244	2540060	278714	276598	SPAC19G12.13c	SPBC106.01	poz1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.559768433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783929	2542244	2542555	278714	279012	SPAC19G12.13c	SPAC1952.06c	poz1	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815975587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783930	2542244	2539352	278714	275918	SPAC19G12.13c	SPCC188.07	poz1	ccq1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.67402156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783931	2542244	2539023	278714	275596	SPAC19G12.13c	SPCC594.05c	poz1	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.263402275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783932	2542244	2539481	278714	276044	SPAC19G12.13c	SPCC622.16c	poz1	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.57907269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783933	2542244	2540498	278714	277026	SPAC19G12.13c	SPBC27.02c	poz1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577939937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783934	2542244	2541531	278714	278031	SPAC19G12.13c	SPAC25A8.01c	poz1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.059090285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783935	2542244	2540134	278714	276671	SPAC19G12.13c	SPBC17A3.03c	poz1	SPBC17A3.03c	-	pi043	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814421699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783936	2542244	2543387	278714	279809	SPAC19G12.13c	SPAPB1E7.02c	poz1	mcl1	-	slr3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.059196894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783937	2542090	5802967	278567	858105	SPAC25G10.08	SPAC20G4.08	SPAC25G10.08	pdc1	p116	SPAC20G4.08|SPAC4F10.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.064055367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783938	2542090	2540686	278567	277211	SPAC25G10.08	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC25G10.08	bdc1	p116	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64954223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783939	2542090	2542273	278567	278742	SPAC25G10.08	SPAC17H9.13c	SPAC25G10.08	SPAC17H9.13c	p116	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44572054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783940	2542090	2543020	278567	279456	SPAC25G10.08	SPAC10F6.13c	SPAC25G10.08	SPAC10F6.13c	p116	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.748822991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783941	2542090	2542596	278567	279050	SPAC25G10.08	SPAC1B3.17	SPAC25G10.08	clr2	p116	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.824359187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783942	2542090	2541776	278567	278270	SPAC25G10.08	SPAC23H3.05c	SPAC25G10.08	swd1	p116	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.087563805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783943	2542090	2538769	278567	275352	SPAC25G10.08	SPCC126.04c	SPAC25G10.08	sgf73	p116	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.525749689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783944	2542090	2540533	278567	277061	SPAC25G10.08	SPBC29A10.16c	SPAC25G10.08	SPBC29A10.16c	p116	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.619620119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783945	2542090	3361389	278567	280465	SPAC25G10.08	SPAC977.13c	SPAC25G10.08	SPAC977.13c	p116	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.585667892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783946	2542090	2540787	278567	277306	SPAC25G10.08	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC25G10.08	sgf29	p116	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.644921738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783947	2540361	2542207	276890	278682	SPBC2F12.13	SPAC17H9.10c	klp5	ddb1	sot1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.993729434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783948	2540361	2540060	276890	276598	SPBC2F12.13	SPBC106.01	klp5	mph1	sot1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.048169981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783949	2540361	2542378	276890	278842	SPBC2F12.13	SPAC1805.04	klp5	nup132	sot1	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.630531338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783950	2540361	2543524	276890	279942	SPBC2F12.13	SPAC4D7.07c	klp5	csi2	sot1	SPAC4D7.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.259772958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783951	2540361	2542237	276890	278709	SPBC2F12.13	SPAC19E9.02	klp5	fin1	sot1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.725161393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783952	2540361	2541856	276890	278347	SPBC2F12.13	SPAC23H3.08c	klp5	bub3	sot1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.926845255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783953	2540361	2541633	276890	278129	SPBC2F12.13	SPAC664.01c	klp5	swi6	sot1	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.084160174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783954	2540361	2540692	276890	277217	SPBC2F12.13	SPBC800.07c	klp5	tsf1	sot1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.121740656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783955	2540361	2542318	276890	278784	SPBC2F12.13	SPAC16C9.05	klp5	cph1	sot1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.30610411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783956	2540361	2543685	276890	280099	SPBC2F12.13	SPAC3C7.03c	klp5	rad55	sot1	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.991078767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783957	2540361	2539129	276890	275701	SPBC2F12.13	SPCC338.14	klp5	ado1	sot1	SPCC338.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637060323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783958	2540361	2543563	276890	279979	SPBC2F12.13	SPAC664.02c	klp5	arp8	sot1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.442240585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783959	2540361	2543078	276890	279511	SPBC2F12.13	SPAC31A2.15c	klp5	dcc1	sot1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.961360374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783960	2540361	2541021	276890	277536	SPBC2F12.13	SPBC3B8.10c	klp5	nem1	sot1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.009671301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783961	2540361	2542268	276890	278737	SPBC2F12.13	SPAC17A5.07c	klp5	ulp2	sot1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.000049379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783962	2540361	2539467	276890	276030	SPBC2F12.13	SPCC417.07c	klp5	mto1	sot1	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.871005199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783963	2540361	2542311	276890	278777	SPBC2F12.13	SPAC16A10.05c	klp5	dad1	sot1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.564604803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783964	2540361	2543514	276890	279932	SPBC2F12.13	SPAC4D7.03	klp5	pop2	sot1	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.115753351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783965	2540361	2543638	276890	280052	SPBC2F12.13	SPAC3H8.09c	klp5	nab3	sot1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817229999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783966	2540361	2542857	276890	279303	SPBC2F12.13	SPAC144.06	klp5	apl5	sot1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440341657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783967	2540361	2538769	276890	275352	SPBC2F12.13	SPCC126.04c	klp5	sgf73	sot1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444338208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783968	2540361	2539667	276890	276222	SPBC2F12.13	SPBC13G1.08c	klp5	ash2	sot1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.568509507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783969	2540361	2543244	276890	279672	SPBC2F12.13	SPAC6B12.06c	klp5	rrg9	sot1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.327628941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783970	2540361	2539232	276890	275802	SPBC2F12.13	SPCC1223.04c	klp5	set11	sot1	mug76	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.002516949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783971	2540361	2541536	276890	278036	SPBC2F12.13	SPAC1071.02	klp5	mms19	sot1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324389835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783972	2540361	2541959	276890	278446	SPBC2F12.13	SPAC23C4.03	klp5	hrk1	sot1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.336035243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783973	2540361	2540967	276890	277483	SPBC2F12.13	SPBC36B7.08c	klp5	SPBC36B7.08c	sot1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.491882488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783974	2540361	2541628	276890	278124	SPBC2F12.13	SPAC110.02	klp5	pds5	sot1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.398155974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783975	2540361	2541531	276890	278031	SPBC2F12.13	SPAC25A8.01c	klp5	fft3	sot1	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5758115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783976	2540361	2542418	276890	278881	SPBC2F12.13	SPAC1805.07c	klp5	dad2	sot1	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.970005012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783977	2540361	2540936	276890	277452	SPBC2F12.13	SPBC800.05c	klp5	atb2	sot1	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.191623602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783978	2540361	2539928	276890	276472	SPBC2F12.13	SPBC1604.08c	klp5	imp1	sot1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.263685099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783979	2540361	2539189	276890	275760	SPBC2F12.13	SPCC1682.16	klp5	rpt4	sot1	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.413972683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783980	2540361	2542021	276890	278504	SPBC2F12.13	SPAP14E8.02	klp5	tos4	sot1	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.25086226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783981	2540361	2542716	276890	279169	SPBC2F12.13	SPAC25H1.07	klp5	emc1	sot1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.678021353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783982	2540361	2541675	276890	278171	SPBC2F12.13	SPAC22F8.12c	klp5	shf1	sot1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638535519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783983	2540361	2543387	276890	279809	SPBC2F12.13	SPAPB1E7.02c	klp5	mcl1	sot1	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.406306039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783984	2540361	2542424	276890	278886	SPBC2F12.13	SPAC1805.14	klp5	SPAC1805.14	sot1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.067815631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783985	2540361	2540787	276890	277306	SPBC2F12.13	SPBC1921.07c	klp5	sgf29	sot1	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713141141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783986	2539870	2542207	276416	278682	SPBC1709.18	SPAC17H9.10c	tif452	ddb1	SPBC409.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.616755126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783987	2539870	2540060	276416	276598	SPBC1709.18	SPBC106.01	tif452	mph1	SPBC409.01	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.859575297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783988	2539870	2540131	276416	276668	SPBC1709.18	SPBC1778.05c	tif452	SPBC1778.05c	SPBC409.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.744531707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783989	2539870	2540425	276416	276953	SPBC1709.18	SPBC27.06c	tif452	mgr2	SPBC409.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.15033184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783990	2539870	2541938	276416	278425	SPBC1709.18	SPAC8C9.16c	tif452	mug63	SPBC409.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870009811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783991	2539870	2542513	276416	278971	SPBC1709.18	SPAC1952.05	tif452	gcn5	SPBC409.01	kat2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.800331724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783992	2539870	2539845	276416	276393	SPBC1709.18	SPBC12C2.02c	tif452	ste20	SPBC409.01	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.231164698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783993	2539870	2540673	276416	277198	SPBC1709.18	SPBC1D7.03	tif452	mug80	SPBC409.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.897707202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783994	2539870	2540751	276416	277273	SPBC1709.18	SPBC20F10.10	tif452	psl1	SPBC409.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445124251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783995	2539870	2541746	276416	278240	SPBC1709.18	SPAC20G4.04c	tif452	hus1	SPBC409.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933030989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783996	2539870	2543567	276416	279983	SPBC1709.18	SPAC890.03	tif452	ppk16	SPBC409.01	mug92	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.44157866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783997	2539870	2540936	276416	277452	SPBC1709.18	SPBC800.05c	tif452	atb2	SPBC409.01	alp2|ban5|tub1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.892123982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783998	2539870	2539189	276416	275760	SPBC1709.18	SPCC1682.16	tif452	rpt4	SPBC409.01	SPCC306.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873718964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
783999	2539870	2541675	276416	278171	SPBC1709.18	SPAC22F8.12c	tif452	shf1	SPBC409.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871970931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784000	2539870	2543387	276416	279809	SPBC1709.18	SPAPB1E7.02c	tif452	mcl1	SPBC409.01	slr3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.892261659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784001	3361478	2542723	280554	279174	SPAC13A11.06	SPAC25H1.03	SPAC13A11.06	atg101	SPAC3H8.01	mug66	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581643272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784002	3361478	2543376	280554	279798	SPAC13A11.06	SPAC3H1.06c	SPAC13A11.06	SPAC3H1.06c	SPAC3H8.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328537623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784003	3361478	2541994	280554	278478	SPAC13A11.06	SPAC26A3.14c	SPAC13A11.06	SPAC26A3.14c	SPAC3H8.01	SPAC23A6.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392523428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784004	3361478	2540801	280554	277320	SPAC13A11.06	SPBC18H10.10c	SPAC13A11.06	saf4	SPAC3H8.01	cwc16|cwf16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.85337608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784005	3361478	2542902	280554	279346	SPAC13A11.06	SPAC144.05	SPAC13A11.06	SPAC144.05	SPAC3H8.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632021441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784006	3361478	2540326	280554	276856	SPAC13A11.06	SPBC2G5.06c	SPAC13A11.06	hmt2	SPAC3H8.01	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.07431366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784007	3361478	2539974	280554	276518	SPAC13A11.06	SPBC32H8.07	SPAC13A11.06	git5	SPAC3H8.01	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.563558249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784008	3361478	2541720	280554	278214	SPAC13A11.06	SPAC23H3.13c	SPAC13A11.06	gpa2	SPAC3H8.01	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582909536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784009	3361478	2540836	280554	277354	SPAC13A11.06	SPBC18H10.19	SPAC13A11.06	vps38	SPAC3H8.01	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443741691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784010	3361478	2538935	280554	275511	SPAC13A11.06	SPCC1682.11c	SPAC13A11.06	ctl1	SPAC3H8.01	SPCC1682.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329921891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784011	3361478	2542439	280554	278901	SPAC13A11.06	SPAC17A5.08	SPAC13A11.06	erp2	SPAC3H8.01	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.059639059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784012	3361478	2542869	280554	279314	SPAC13A11.06	SPAC140.02	SPAC13A11.06	gar2	SPAC3H8.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331312683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784013	3361478	2539768	280554	276319	SPAC13A11.06	SPBC1703.09	SPAC13A11.06	SPBC1703.09	SPAC3H8.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979022593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784014	2539232	2542378	275802	278842	SPCC1223.04c	SPAC1805.04	set11	nup132	mug76	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.576750764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784015	2539232	2541856	275802	278347	SPCC1223.04c	SPAC23H3.08c	set11	bub3	mug76	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507235744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784016	2539232	2538922	275802	275499	SPCC1223.04c	SPCC16C4.10	set11	SPCC16C4.10	mug76	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.588261918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784017	2539232	2539420	275802	275985	SPCC1223.04c	SPCC970.07c	set11	raf2	mug76	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.553275333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784018	2539232	2539564	275802	276125	SPCC1223.04c	SPCC550.12	set11	arp6	mug76	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.316581648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784019	2539232	2540929	275802	277445	SPCC1223.04c	SPBC354.03	set11	swd3	mug76	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.916291207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784020	2539232	2542318	275802	278784	SPCC1223.04c	SPAC16C9.05	set11	cph1	mug76	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.473745007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784021	2539232	2543426	275802	279846	SPCC1223.04c	SPAC631.02	set11	bdf2	mug76	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.625985321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784022	2539232	2538906	275802	275483	SPCC1223.04c	SPCC1259.03	set11	rpa12	mug76	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.250311853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784023	2539232	2540825	275802	277343	SPCC1223.04c	SPBC428.08c	set11	clr4	mug76	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.001901285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784024	2539232	2542311	275802	278777	SPCC1223.04c	SPAC16A10.05c	set11	dad1	mug76	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.052752259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784025	2539232	2539667	275802	276222	SPCC1223.04c	SPBC13G1.08c	set11	ash2	mug76	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.599525048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784026	2539232	2540967	275802	277483	SPCC1223.04c	SPBC36B7.08c	set11	SPBC36B7.08c	mug76	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.165615166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784027	2539232	2540589	275802	277115	SPCC1223.04c	SPBC20F10.06	set11	mad2	mug76	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391419844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784028	2539232	2538848	275802	275429	SPCC1223.04c	SPCC613.12c	set11	raf1	mug76	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978767125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784029	2539232	2541713	275802	278208	SPCC1223.04c	SPAC3A12.12	set11	atp11	mug76	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.480868419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784030	2539232	2539908	275802	276454	SPCC1223.04c	SPBC13E7.06	set11	msd1	mug76	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.816983275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784031	2539232	2541156	275802	277671	SPCC1223.04c	SPBC685.07c	set11	rpl2701	mug76	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.760373314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784032	2539232	2543628	275802	280042	SPCC1223.04c	SPAC3H8.10	set11	spo20	mug76	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.497855409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784033	2539232	2543304	275802	279728	SPCC1223.04c	SPAC6B12.12	set11	tom70	mug76	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.819189627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784034	2539232	2541531	275802	278031	SPCC1223.04c	SPAC25A8.01c	set11	fft3	mug76	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.975846579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784035	2539232	2539700	275802	276253	SPCC1223.04c	SPBC1685.15c	set11	klp6	mug76	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.843107818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784036	2539232	2543387	275802	279809	SPCC1223.04c	SPAPB1E7.02c	set11	mcl1	mug76	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.129948586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784037	2539232	2540320	275802	276850	SPCC1223.04c	SPBC3D6.04c	set11	mad1	mug76	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.684225943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784038	2541598	2539774	278095	276325	SPAC16.05c	SPBC17A3.10	sfp1	pas4	-	pi036	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934849735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784039	2541598	2542207	278095	278682	SPAC16.05c	SPAC17H9.10c	sfp1	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.066753641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784040	2541598	2539050	278095	275623	SPAC16.05c	SPCC11E10.08	sfp1	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.897872567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784041	2541598	2542862	278095	279308	SPAC16.05c	SPAC140.03	sfp1	arb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.387414631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784042	2541598	2540105	278095	276642	SPAC16.05c	SPBC106.04	sfp1	ada1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.265726534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784043	2541598	2543529	278095	279947	SPAC16.05c	SPAC4C5.02c	sfp1	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808530894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784044	2541598	2542382	278095	278846	SPAC16.05c	SPAC6G10.06	sfp1	SPAC6G10.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.062912819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784045	2541598	2541343	278095	277854	SPAC16.05c	SPBPB2B2.19c	sfp1	SPBPB2B2.19c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388286325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784046	2541598	2541512	278095	278013	SPAC16.05c	SPAC11E3.08c	sfp1	nse6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201487874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784047	2541598	2540913	278095	277429	SPAC16.05c	SPBC56F2.08c	sfp1	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.075866861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784048	2541598	2542066	278095	278543	SPAC16.05c	SPAC227.05	sfp1	SPAC227.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.416584283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784049	2541598	2541570	278095	278067	SPAC16.05c	SPAC6G9.09c	sfp1	rpl2401	-	rpl24|rpl24-01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.93814164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784050	2541598	2540131	278095	276668	SPAC16.05c	SPBC1778.05c	sfp1	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.809131918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784051	2541598	2540524	278095	277052	SPAC16.05c	SPBC21B10.08c	sfp1	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.446582087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784052	2541598	2540528	278095	277056	SPAC16.05c	SPBC18H10.04c	sfp1	sce3	-	tif48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.977289562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784053	2541598	2541621	278095	278118	SPAC16.05c	SPAC29A4.17c	sfp1	SPAC29A4.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.435590341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784054	2541598	2539930	278095	276474	SPAC16.05c	SPBC1198.11c	sfp1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.994591332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784055	2541598	2541134	278095	277649	SPAC16.05c	SPBC776.16	sfp1	mis20	-	SPBC776.16|eic2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.053993919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784056	2541598	2541438	278095	277943	SPAC16.05c	SPAC23G3.10c	sfp1	ssr3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.826769197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784057	2541598	2542443	278095	278905	SPAC16.05c	SPAC17G6.13	sfp1	slt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.512672695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784058	2541598	2541117	278095	277632	SPAC16.05c	SPBC646.13	sfp1	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.991840617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784059	2541598	2542747	278095	279197	SPAC16.05c	SPAC15A10.06	sfp1	SPAC15A10.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.261943483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784060	2541598	2541345	278095	277856	SPAC16.05c	SPBP35G2.07	sfp1	ilv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.464433435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784061	2541598	2541633	278095	278129	SPAC16.05c	SPAC664.01c	sfp1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.870831604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784062	2541598	2542963	278095	279403	SPAC16.05c	SPAC1071.03c	sfp1	sil1	-	SPAC1071.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.559434973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784063	2541598	2540347	278095	276876	SPAC16.05c	SPBC30B4.08	sfp1	eri1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.804093971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784064	2541598	2543652	278095	280066	SPAC16.05c	SPAC4H3.03c	sfp1	SPAC4H3.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.344445735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784065	2541598	2543434	278095	279854	SPAC16.05c	SPAC8F11.02c	sfp1	dph3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.655158634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784066	2541598	2540686	278095	277211	SPAC16.05c	SPBC21D10.10	sfp1	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513115395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784067	2541598	2538922	278095	275499	SPAC16.05c	SPCC16C4.10	sfp1	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.43737147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784068	2541598	2542103	278095	278579	SPAC16.05c	SPAC31G5.11	sfp1	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.46188187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784069	2541598	2542345	278095	278811	SPAC16.05c	SPAC1705.02	sfp1	SPAC1705.02	-	SPAC1F2.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.054037804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784070	2541598	2540491	278095	277019	SPAC16.05c	SPBC28E12.04	sfp1	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.82750548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784071	2541598	2542040	278095	278521	SPAC16.05c	SPAC212.01c	sfp1	SPAC212.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.50375412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784072	2541598	2540664	278095	277189	SPAC16.05c	SPBC215.02	sfp1	bob1	-	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.064632598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784073	2541598	2540999	278095	277515	SPAC16.05c	SPBC4B4.04	sfp1	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38022186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784074	2541598	2539332	278095	275898	SPAC16.05c	SPCPB1C11.01	sfp1	amt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38090006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784075	2541598	3361375	278095	280451	SPAC16.05c	SPAC212.06c	sfp1	SPAC212.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.652113623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784076	2541598	3361570	278095	280646	SPAC16.05c	SPAC750.01	sfp1	SPAC750.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.784476969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784077	2541598	2539226	278095	275796	SPAC16.05c	SPCC16C4.20c	sfp1	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.381594792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784078	2541598	2539420	278095	275985	SPAC16.05c	SPCC970.07c	sfp1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.835497478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784079	2541598	2540015	278095	276559	SPAC16.05c	SPBC1685.02c	sfp1	rps1202	-	rps12-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149480553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784080	2541598	2541208	278095	277722	SPAC16.05c	SPBC887.04c	sfp1	lub1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.320330442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784081	2541598	2541012	278095	277527	SPAC16.05c	SPBC3H7.12	sfp1	rav2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.52590773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784082	2541598	2538847	278095	275428	SPAC16.05c	SPCC594.06c	sfp1	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.714051914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784083	2541598	2539443	278095	276006	SPAC16.05c	SPCC736.02	sfp1	SPCC736.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.809654689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784084	2541598	2542273	278095	278742	SPAC16.05c	SPAC17H9.13c	sfp1	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.19185267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784085	2541598	2539564	278095	276125	SPAC16.05c	SPCC550.12	sfp1	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194750668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784086	2541598	2543316	278095	279740	SPAC16.05c	SPAPJ691.02	sfp1	SPAPJ691.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.200507528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784087	2541598	2539434	278095	275997	SPAC16.05c	SPCC757.09c	sfp1	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.400498119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784088	2541598	2543453	278095	279873	SPAC16.05c	SPAC3G9.03	sfp1	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453393301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784089	2541598	2540220	278095	276753	SPAC16.05c	SPBC337.03	sfp1	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.436638787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784090	2541598	2542627	278095	279081	SPAC16.05c	SPAC750.04c	sfp1	SPAC750.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.343144103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784091	2541598	3361381	278095	280457	SPAC16.05c	SPAC12G12.01c	sfp1	SPAC12G12.01c	-	SPAC630.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871184679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784092	2541598	2539797	278095	276347	SPAC16.05c	SPBC16G5.14c	sfp1	rps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.48860458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784093	2541598	2539575	278095	276135	SPAC16.05c	SPCP20C8.02c	sfp1	SPCP20C8.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.328250844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784094	2541598	2543048	278095	279483	SPAC16.05c	SPAC3F10.02c	sfp1	trk1	-	sptrk	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.346335332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784095	2541598	2539937	278095	276481	SPAC16.05c	SPBC1539.08	sfp1	arf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.323439068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784096	2541598	2541761	278095	278255	SPAC16.05c	SPAC7D4.12c	sfp1	SPAC7D4.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.563393807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784097	2541598	2541669	278095	278165	SPAC16.05c	SPAC22G7.07c	sfp1	ime4	-	SPAC22G7.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.710538782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784098	2541598	3361342	278095	280418	SPAC16.05c	SPBC16D10.07c	sfp1	sir2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.219235488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784099	2541598	2541323	278095	277835	SPAC16.05c	SPBP35G2.14	sfp1	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.521440392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784100	2541598	2542318	278095	278784	SPAC16.05c	SPAC16C9.05	sfp1	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.048383378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784101	2541598	2541527	278095	278027	SPAC16.05c	SPAC31A2.09c	sfp1	apm4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.813534271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784102	2541598	2539792	278095	276342	SPAC16.05c	SPBC1271.14	sfp1	SPBC1271.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.419080473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784103	2541598	2540595	278095	277121	SPAC16.05c	SPBC21C3.02c	sfp1	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.770224598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784104	2541598	2539244	278095	275814	SPAC16.05c	SPCC1672.06c	sfp1	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.969682983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784105	2541598	2543563	278095	279979	SPAC16.05c	SPAC664.02c	sfp1	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.028231046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784106	2541598	2543584	278095	279999	SPAC16.05c	SPAPB1E7.11c	sfp1	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047452246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784107	2541598	2539352	278095	275918	SPAC16.05c	SPCC188.07	sfp1	ccq1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.540231117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784108	2541598	2539100	278095	275672	SPAC16.05c	SPCC330.12c	sfp1	sdh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321956486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784109	2541598	2538700	278095	275285	SPAC16.05c	SPCC645.13	sfp1	SPCC645.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.272840805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784110	2541598	2538906	278095	275483	SPAC16.05c	SPCC1259.03	sfp1	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.384953729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784111	2541598	2542981	278095	279419	SPAC16.05c	SPAC824.02	sfp1	bst1	-	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.013564156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784112	2541598	2539478	278095	276041	SPAC16.05c	SPCC550.07	sfp1	SPCC550.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.50585662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784113	2541598	2540825	278095	277343	SPAC16.05c	SPBC428.08c	sfp1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.506009452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784114	2541598	3361543	278095	280619	SPAC16.05c	SPAC9.13c	sfp1	cwf16	-	SPAPJ735.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.311074485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784115	2541598	2540964	278095	277480	SPAC16.05c	SPBC365.16	sfp1	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.842228313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784116	2541598	2539310	278095	275877	SPAC16.05c	SPCC285.17	sfp1	spp27	-	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.211159066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784117	2541598	2539098	278095	275670	SPAC16.05c	SPCC24B10.18	sfp1	SPCC24B10.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44786072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784118	2541598	2539705	278095	276258	SPAC16.05c	SPBC1105.10	sfp1	rav1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.25786524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784119	2541598	2539870	278095	276416	SPAC16.05c	SPBC1709.18	sfp1	tif452	-	SPBC409.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379731486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784120	2541598	2541649	278095	278145	SPAC16.05c	SPAC1F3.06c	sfp1	spo15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.326305498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784121	2541598	2542499	278095	278958	SPAC16.05c	SPAC1F12.04c	sfp1	SPAC1F12.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.287030892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784122	2541598	2540892	278095	277408	SPAC16.05c	SPBC530.01	sfp1	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.996953105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784123	2541598	2543593	278095	280008	SPAC16.05c	SPAC4G9.10	sfp1	arg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.36114316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784124	2541598	2540401	278095	276929	SPAC16.05c	SPBC2A9.02	sfp1	SPBC2A9.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.146692477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784125	2541598	2539845	278095	276393	SPAC16.05c	SPBC12C2.02c	sfp1	ste20	-	ste16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.826099521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784126	2541598	2538770	278095	275353	SPAC16.05c	SPCC1753.02c	sfp1	git3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.824830592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784127	2541598	2542652	278095	279106	SPAC16.05c	SPAC1687.15	sfp1	gsk3	-	skp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.417058715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784128	2541598	2541160	278095	277675	SPAC16.05c	SPBC725.09c	sfp1	hob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.812092685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784129	2541598	2539733	278095	276285	SPAC16.05c	SPBC16E9.12c	sfp1	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.997435731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784130	2541598	2540673	278095	277198	SPAC16.05c	SPBC1D7.03	sfp1	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.908374018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784131	2541598	2539046	278095	275619	SPAC16.05c	SPCC1223.12c	sfp1	meu10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708575001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784132	2541598	2540150	278095	276687	SPAC16.05c	SPBC16E9.14c	sfp1	zrg17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.931752698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784133	2541598	2542160	278095	278636	SPAC16.05c	SPAC8C9.11	sfp1	fra2	-	SPAC8C9.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.739004043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784134	2541598	2539898	278095	276444	SPAC16.05c	SPBC12D12.07c	sfp1	trx2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.438398347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784135	2541598	2541520	278095	278021	SPAC16.05c	SPAC2E1P5.03	sfp1	SPAC2E1P5.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.76478545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784136	2541598	2542168	278095	278643	SPAC16.05c	SPAC17A5.16	sfp1	ftp105	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389606151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784137	2541598	2542817	278095	279264	SPAC16.05c	SPAC13G6.02c	sfp1	rps101	-	rps1-1|rps3a-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.932877094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784138	2541598	2539484	278095	276047	SPAC16.05c	SPCC594.04c	sfp1	SPCC594.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.333511849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784139	2541598	2542873	278095	279318	SPAC16.05c	SPAC9G1.02	sfp1	wis4	-	wak1|wik1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.83780221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784140	2541598	2543667	278095	280081	SPAC16.05c	SPAC4H3.02c	sfp1	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.063826431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784141	2541598	2541183	278095	277697	SPAC16.05c	SPBC725.14	sfp1	arg6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.6160064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784142	2541598	2539689	278095	276244	SPAC16.05c	SPBC1861.03	sfp1	mak10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.898247097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784143	2541598	2543346	278095	279768	SPAC16.05c	SPAC688.14	sfp1	set13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448072747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784144	2541598	2542651	278095	279105	SPAC16.05c	SPAC24C9.12c	sfp1	SPAC24C9.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389590962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784145	2541598	2543250	278095	279678	SPAC16.05c	SPAC3G9.15c	sfp1	fcf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.030045199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784146	2541598	2538852	278095	275433	SPAC16.05c	SPCC4E9.01c	sfp1	rec11	-	SPCC550.16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453408152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784147	2541598	2540200	278095	276733	SPAC16.05c	SPBC1709.06	sfp1	dus2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.394315906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784148	2541598	2541978	278095	278463	SPAC16.05c	SPAC6G9.12	sfp1	cfr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.566531709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784149	2541598	2540961	278095	277477	SPAC16.05c	SPBC36B7.03	sfp1	sec63	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515211522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784150	2541598	2541720	278095	278214	SPAC16.05c	SPAC23H3.13c	sfp1	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.42993251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784151	2541598	2543253	278095	279681	SPAC16.05c	SPAC8C9.05	sfp1	SPAC8C9.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.676119345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784152	2541598	2543236	278095	279664	SPAC16.05c	SPAC8C9.04	sfp1	SPAC8C9.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.435287451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784153	2541598	2543495	278095	279914	SPAC16.05c	SPAC513.03	sfp1	mfm2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.628448325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784154	2541598	2541241	278095	277755	SPAC16.05c	SPBC887.17	sfp1	SPBC887.17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.280162255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784155	2541598	2543378	278095	279800	SPAC16.05c	SPAC3H8.07c	sfp1	pac10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.704889741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784156	2541598	2539481	278095	276044	SPAC16.05c	SPCC622.16c	sfp1	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.544148413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784157	2541598	2541009	278095	277524	SPAC16.05c	SPBC428.04	sfp1	apq12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.925153465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784158	2541598	2539953	278095	276497	SPAC16.05c	SPBC1709.11c	sfp1	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441978429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784159	2541598	2542056	278095	278535	SPAC16.05c	SPAC6G9.14	sfp1	SPAC6G9.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508532235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784160	2541598	2541954	278095	278441	SPAC16.05c	SPAC23C4.05c	sfp1	SPAC23C4.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.823196691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784161	2541598	2542008	278095	278491	SPAC16.05c	SPAC2G11.07c	sfp1	ptc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.549593608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784162	2541598	2541708	278095	278203	SPAC16.05c	SPAC31A2.02	sfp1	trm112	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.559202013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784163	2541598	2541053	278095	277568	SPAC16.05c	SPBC56F2.10c	sfp1	alg5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.608715455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784164	2541598	2542597	278095	279051	SPAC16.05c	SPAP8A3.07c	sfp1	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199654833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784165	2541598	2542267	278095	278736	SPAC16.05c	SPAPYUK71.03c	sfp1	syn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.524348817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784166	2541598	2541296	278095	277808	SPAC16.05c	SPBP8B7.06	sfp1	rpp201	-	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.677113711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784167	2541598	2541266	278095	277780	SPAC16.05c	SPBP16F5.05c	sfp1	yar1	-	SPBP16F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.392981274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784168	2541598	2541186	278095	277700	SPAC16.05c	SPBC725.01	sfp1	SPBC725.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.002335335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784169	2541598	2538690	278095	275275	SPAC16.05c	SPCC1393.05	sfp1	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.283017532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784170	2541598	2542060	278095	278538	SPAC16.05c	SPAC23C11.14	sfp1	zhf1	-	zhf	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.659870361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784171	2541598	2538884	278095	275462	SPAC16.05c	SPCC1393.08	sfp1	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.576635631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784172	2541598	2538839	278095	275420	SPAC16.05c	SPCC338.18	sfp1	SPCC338.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704296124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784173	2541598	2540005	278095	276549	SPAC16.05c	SPBC1347.09	sfp1	SPBC1347.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.861923365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784174	2541598	2543139	278095	279571	SPAC16.05c	SPAC12G12.03	sfp1	cip2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19614409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784175	2541598	2541742	278095	278236	SPAC16.05c	SPAC22H10.09	sfp1	SPAC22H10.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.284771282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784176	2541598	2542453	278095	278914	SPAC16.05c	SPAC186.01	sfp1	pfl9	-	SPAC186.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.546455956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784177	2541598	2538848	278095	275429	SPAC16.05c	SPCC613.12c	sfp1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.838154222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784178	2541598	2541896	278095	278386	SPAC16.05c	SPAC23H4.16c	sfp1	SPAC23H4.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.275296459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784179	2541598	2540821	278095	277339	SPAC16.05c	SPBC800.03	sfp1	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77284613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784180	2541598	2542170	278095	278645	SPAC16.05c	SPAC17G8.13c	sfp1	mst2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.998425409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784181	2541598	2539706	278095	276259	SPAC16.05c	SPBC16G5.13	sfp1	ptf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.489649877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784182	2541598	2542198	278095	278673	SPAC16.05c	SPAC6F12.09	sfp1	rdp1	-	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.19957737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784183	2541598	2543391	278095	279813	SPAC16.05c	SPAC4G9.09c	sfp1	arg11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.291331247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784184	2541598	2540442	278095	276970	SPAC16.05c	SPBC25B2.04c	sfp1	mtg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.656329084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784185	2541598	2539354	278095	275920	SPAC16.05c	SPCC4F11.03c	sfp1	SPCC4F11.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868530679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784186	2541598	3361389	278095	280465	SPAC16.05c	SPAC977.13c	sfp1	SPAC977.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.411922727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784187	2541598	2543628	278095	280042	SPAC16.05c	SPAC3H8.10	sfp1	spo20	-	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.37067339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784188	2541598	2542769	278095	279219	SPAC16.05c	SPAC15A10.10	sfp1	mde6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.687998251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784189	2541598	2542516	278095	278974	SPAC16.05c	SPAC2F7.04	sfp1	pmc2	-	med1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.800278496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784190	2541598	2542327	278095	278793	SPAC16.05c	SPAC16C9.06c	sfp1	upf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.75900172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784191	2541598	2543106	278095	279538	SPAC16.05c	SPAC3A11.13	sfp1	SPAC3A11.13	-	SPAC3H5.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.982764087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784192	2541598	2543670	278095	280084	SPAC16.05c	SPAPB1E7.06c	sfp1	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.103178305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784193	2541598	2543267	278095	279695	SPAC16.05c	SPAC1002.12c	sfp1	SPAC1002.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.831414061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784194	2541598	2539600	278095	276158	SPAC16.05c	SPCP1E11.03	sfp1	mug170	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.179310966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784195	2541598	2540800	278095	277319	SPAC16.05c	SPBC409.20c	sfp1	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.180941862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784196	2541598	2543304	278095	279728	SPAC16.05c	SPAC6B12.12	sfp1	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925473633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784197	2541598	2541372	278095	277883	SPAC16.05c	SPBP8B7.28c	sfp1	stc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.940866825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784198	2541598	2543066	278095	279499	SPAC16.05c	SPAC343.12	sfp1	rds1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377015078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784199	2541598	2543662	278095	280076	SPAC16.05c	SPAC9.07c	sfp1	SPAC9.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.549945208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784200	2541598	2539239	278095	275809	SPAC16.05c	SPCC1020.10	sfp1	oca2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.955968391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784201	2541598	2540115	278095	276652	SPAC16.05c	SPBC1778.02	sfp1	rap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.814240299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784202	2541598	2540346	278095	276875	SPAC16.05c	SPBC2F12.03c	sfp1	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.292310586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784203	2541598	2540699	278095	277223	SPAC16.05c	SPBC800.08	sfp1	gcd10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.560089481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784204	2541598	2541797	278095	278288	SPAC16.05c	SPAC22F3.04	sfp1	mug62	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.210041786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784205	2541598	2541229	278095	277743	SPAC16.05c	SPBC839.05c	sfp1	rps1701	-	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.615310965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784206	2541598	2540677	278095	277202	SPAC16.05c	SPBC21B10.03c	sfp1	ath1	-	SPBC21B10.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.082396224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784207	2541598	2542222	278095	278695	SPAC16.05c	SPAC31G5.18c	sfp1	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.277226507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784208	2541598	2543437	278095	279857	SPAC16.05c	SPAPB1A10.14	sfp1	pof15	-	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.216720307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784209	2541598	2540569	278095	277096	SPAC16.05c	SPBC660.17c	sfp1	SPBC660.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.78045836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784210	2541598	2540516	278095	277044	SPAC16.05c	SPBC21C3.01c	sfp1	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.429775555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784211	2541598	2540182	278095	276715	SPAC16.05c	SPBC16G5.06	sfp1	SPBC16G5.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.568633585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784212	2541598	2543672	278095	280086	SPAC16.05c	SPAC4H3.01	sfp1	SPAC4H3.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.495226896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784213	2541598	2540140	278095	276677	SPAC16.05c	SPBC16C6.08c	sfp1	qcr6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378052229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784214	2541598	2540551	278095	277078	SPAC16.05c	SPBC23E6.01c	sfp1	cxr1	-	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.69760148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784215	2541598	2539189	278095	275760	SPAC16.05c	SPCC1682.16	sfp1	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.452965324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784216	2541598	2539169	278095	275740	SPAC16.05c	SPCC1235.11	sfp1	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.276671887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784217	2541598	2541238	278095	277752	SPAC16.05c	SPBC8E4.05c	sfp1	SPBC8E4.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.671262151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784218	2541598	2542716	278095	279169	SPAC16.05c	SPAC25H1.07	sfp1	emc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.086300038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784219	2541598	2541806	278095	278297	SPAC16.05c	SPAC4G8.13c	sfp1	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377140803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784220	2541598	2543387	278095	279809	SPAC16.05c	SPAPB1E7.02c	sfp1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321130001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784221	2541598	2538854	278095	275435	SPAC16.05c	SPCP1E11.05c	sfp1	are2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.56347191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784222	2541598	2542175	278095	278650	SPAC16.05c	SPAC1F3.02c	sfp1	mkh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.720942431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784223	2541598	2542795	278095	279243	SPAC16.05c	SPAC9G1.05	sfp1	aip1	-	SPAC9G1.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.053373462	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784224	2541598	2538920	278095	275497	SPAC16.05c	SPCC1840.05c	sfp1	SPCC1840.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.696158141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784225	2541598	2540360	278095	276889	SPAC16.05c	SPBC2G5.01	sfp1	SPBC2G5.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.398309867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784226	2541598	2542424	278095	278886	SPAC16.05c	SPAC1805.14	sfp1	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.032551945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784227	2541598	2541050	278095	277565	SPAC16.05c	SPBC428.05c	sfp1	arg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.442619262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784228	2541598	2539588	278095	276146	SPAC16.05c	SPCC962.04	sfp1	rps1201	-	rps12|rps12-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.420912763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784229	2541598	2539085	278095	275657	SPAC16.05c	SPCC285.15c	sfp1	rps2802	-	rps28|rps28-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.503995221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784230	2541598	2539220	278095	275790	SPAC16.05c	SPCC297.05	sfp1	SPCC297.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.688723789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784231	2541598	2538947	278095	275521	SPAC16.05c	SPCC1682.12c	sfp1	ubp16	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.141582958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784232	2541598	2543448	278095	279868	SPAC16.05c	SPAC3H5.07	sfp1	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98864095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784233	2541598	2542440	278095	278902	SPAC16.05c	SPAC17A2.12	sfp1	rrp1	-	SPAC17A2.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.924698663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784234	2541598	2541431	278095	277936	SPAC16.05c	SPAC1F3.08c	sfp1	SPAC1F3.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.628110706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784235	2541598	2542656	278095	279110	SPAC16.05c	SPAC2E1P3.05c	sfp1	SPAC2E1P3.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.907476897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784236	2541598	2541124	278095	277639	SPAC16.05c	SPBC646.02	sfp1	cwf11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.312901386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784237	2541598	2541272	278095	277786	SPAC16.05c	SPBC947.03c	sfp1	naa38	-	mak31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.393211977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784238	2541598	2542561	278095	279017	SPAC16.05c	SPAC31G5.17c	sfp1	rps1001	-	rps10-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095640169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784239	2541598	2542094	278095	278571	SPAC16.05c	SPAC29B12.06c	sfp1	rcd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.961472787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784240	2541598	2540208	278095	276741	SPAC16.05c	SPBC9B6.03	sfp1	SPBC9B6.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.264692333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784241	2541598	2542617	278095	279071	SPAC16.05c	SPAC13A11.01c	sfp1	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.494310235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784242	2541598	2543501	278095	279919	SPAC16.05c	SPAC664.14	sfp1	amt2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817671093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784243	2541598	2538730	278095	275314	SPAC16.05c	SPCC31H12.02c	sfp1	mug73	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979811593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784244	2539373	2543637	275939	280051	SPCC306.05c	SPAC3H8.02	ins1	csr102	-	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.036947869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784245	2539373	2540161	275939	276696	SPCC306.05c	SPBC13E7.03c	ins1	SPBC13E7.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.339182319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784246	2539373	2541560	275939	278059	SPCC306.05c	SPAC24B11.12c	ins1	SPAC24B11.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81434031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784247	2539373	2540467	275939	276995	SPCC306.05c	SPBC2G2.07c	ins1	mug178	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.402709899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784248	2539373	2539348	275939	275914	SPCC306.05c	SPCC18B5.07c	ins1	nup61	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45318859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784249	2539373	2539239	275939	275809	SPCC306.05c	SPCC1020.10	ins1	oca2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.500591412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784250	2539373	2539359	275939	275925	SPCC306.05c	SPCC16C4.06c	ins1	pus3	-	SPCC16C4.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331306469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784251	2539373	2540304	275939	276834	SPCC306.05c	SPBC354.13	ins1	rga6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199440955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784252	2539373	2541675	275939	278171	SPCC306.05c	SPAC22F8.12c	ins1	shf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.411005364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784253	2539101	2543317	275673	279741	SPCC736.04c	SPAC823.14	gma12	ptf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041271381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784254	2539101	2542577	275673	279033	SPCC736.04c	SPAC19G12.15c	gma12	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.908496094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784255	2539101	2539949	275673	276493	SPCC736.04c	SPBC1703.04	gma12	mlh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.482880432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784256	2539101	2543637	275673	280051	SPCC736.04c	SPAC3H8.02	gma12	csr102	-	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.337293644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784257	2539101	2540913	275673	277429	SPCC736.04c	SPBC56F2.08c	gma12	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328368217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784258	2539101	2542293	275673	278761	SPCC736.04c	SPAC17G8.14c	gma12	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.496065202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784259	2539101	2538896	275673	275474	SPCC736.04c	SPCC584.11c	gma12	SPCC584.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.617052131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784260	2539101	2539930	275673	276474	SPCC736.04c	SPBC1198.11c	gma12	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642907359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784261	2539101	2540068	275673	276606	SPCC736.04c	SPBC1734.12c	gma12	alg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.834899024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784262	2539101	2539939	275673	276483	SPCC736.04c	SPBC11G11.01	gma12	fis1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.315569681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784263	2539101	2542098	275673	278574	SPCC736.04c	SPAC30D11.01c	gma12	gto2	-	SPAC30D11.01c|SPAC56F8.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.064792948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784264	2539101	2541633	275673	278129	SPCC736.04c	SPAC664.01c	gma12	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.359224119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784265	2539101	2541733	275673	278227	SPCC736.04c	SPAC27F1.03c	gma12	uch1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.941111567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784266	2539101	2542392	275673	278856	SPCC736.04c	SPAC19D5.02c	gma12	SPAC19D5.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.133370995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784267	2539101	2542103	275673	278579	SPCC736.04c	SPAC31G5.11	gma12	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.840229789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784268	2539101	2541098	275673	277613	SPCC736.04c	SPBC577.13	gma12	syj2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385802604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784269	2539101	2541082	275673	277597	SPCC736.04c	SPBC577.11	gma12	SPBC577.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.193034104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784270	2539101	2542468	275673	278929	SPCC736.04c	SPAC1D4.09c	gma12	rtf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391077341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784271	2539101	2542816	275673	279263	SPCC736.04c	SPAC4G8.11c	gma12	atp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.252892151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784272	2539101	2542689	275673	279142	SPCC736.04c	SPAC29B12.04	gma12	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318277959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784273	2539101	2542709	275673	279162	SPCC736.04c	SPAC26F1.08c	gma12	SPAC26F1.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453887834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784274	2539101	2539249	275673	275819	SPCC736.04c	SPCC1450.05c	gma12	rox3	-	med19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.902891193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784275	2539101	2539606	275673	276164	SPCC736.04c	SPBC15D4.05	gma12	SPBC15D4.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32246205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784276	2539101	2541323	275673	277835	SPCC736.04c	SPBP35G2.14	gma12	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842005078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784277	2539101	2540425	275673	276953	SPCC736.04c	SPBC27.06c	gma12	mgr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.457510058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784278	2539101	2543685	275673	280099	SPCC736.04c	SPAC3C7.03c	gma12	rad55	-	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.588411628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784279	2539101	2541428	275673	277933	SPCC736.04c	SPAC14C4.11	gma12	SPAC14C4.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.20779568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784280	2539101	2541580	275673	278077	SPCC736.04c	SPAC1687.05	gma12	pli1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045455457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784281	2539101	2539648	275673	276203	SPCC736.04c	SPBC1198.08	gma12	SPBC1198.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.261791812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784282	2539101	2538698	275673	275283	SPCC736.04c	SPCC1442.02	gma12	SPCC1442.02	-	SPCC1450.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.31445062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784283	2539101	2541014	275673	277529	SPCC736.04c	SPBC3D6.06c	gma12	prs5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.264670273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784284	2539101	2542640	275673	279094	SPCC736.04c	SPAC9E9.12c	gma12	ybt1	-	abc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036614366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784285	2539101	2539381	275673	275947	SPCC736.04c	SPCC1739.10	gma12	mug33	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387198265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784286	2539101	2541021	275673	277536	SPCC736.04c	SPBC3B8.10c	gma12	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.741983664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784287	2539101	2541246	275673	277760	SPCC736.04c	SPBC8E4.02c	gma12	SPBC8E4.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389913057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784288	2539101	2540964	275673	277480	SPCC736.04c	SPBC365.16	gma12	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.326394505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784289	2539101	2542331	275673	278797	SPCC736.04c	SPAC1834.05	gma12	alg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.300054009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784290	2539101	2542371	275673	278835	SPCC736.04c	SPACUNK4.17	gma12	SPACUNK4.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.969758396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784291	2539101	2542177	275673	278652	SPCC736.04c	SPAC17H9.08	gma12	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.807066367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784292	2539101	2540797	275673	277316	SPCC736.04c	SPBC18H10.11c	gma12	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.977980173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784293	2539101	2541982	275673	278467	SPCC736.04c	SPAC23A1.06c	gma12	cmk2	-	mkp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.818004479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784294	2539101	2542776	275673	279225	SPCC736.04c	SPAC167.01	gma12	ire1	-	ppk4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092805615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784295	2539101	2540673	275673	277198	SPCC736.04c	SPBC1D7.03	gma12	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712476293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784296	2539101	2540363	275673	276892	SPCC736.04c	SPBC2F12.09c	gma12	atf21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317787333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784297	2539101	2543638	275673	280052	SPCC736.04c	SPAC3H8.09c	gma12	nab3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.37739695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784298	2539101	2541889	275673	278379	SPCC736.04c	SPAC2F7.03c	gma12	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.127853016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784299	2539101	2541578	275673	278075	SPCC736.04c	SPAC25B8.05	gma12	deg1	-	SPAC25B8.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575358978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784300	2539101	2542989	275673	279427	SPCC736.04c	SPAC11E3.13c	gma12	gas5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.845073743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784301	2539101	2541496	275673	277998	SPCC736.04c	SPAC23D3.09	gma12	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.629926145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784302	2539101	2542216	275673	278690	SPCC736.04c	SPAC19A8.02	gma12	SPAC19A8.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452245992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784303	2539101	2541929	275673	278417	SPCC736.04c	SPAC23C4.12	gma12	hhp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.347802813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784304	2539101	2541413	275673	277921	SPCC736.04c	SPBPJ4664.06	gma12	gpt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51786477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784305	2539101	2540452	275673	276980	SPCC736.04c	SPBC2A9.11c	gma12	iss9	-	SPBC2A9.11c|SPBC2D10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.192742455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784306	2539101	2542357	275673	278822	SPCC736.04c	SPAC1782.07	gma12	qcr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.628809168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784307	2539101	2540086	275673	276624	SPCC736.04c	SPBC16H5.12c	gma12	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.194000748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784308	2539101	2540326	275673	276856	SPCC736.04c	SPBC2G5.06c	gma12	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.187301295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784309	2539101	2539667	275673	276222	SPCC736.04c	SPBC13G1.08c	gma12	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.847888046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784310	2539101	2541830	275673	278321	SPCC736.04c	SPAC5H10.01	gma12	SPAC5H10.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.053583619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784311	2539101	2542710	275673	279163	SPCC736.04c	SPAC750.08c	gma12	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.297223678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784312	2539101	2540256	275673	276787	SPCC736.04c	SPBC32F12.12c	gma12	SPBC32F12.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505507136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784313	2539101	2542946	275673	279386	SPCC736.04c	SPAC6F12.03c	gma12	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.411602272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784314	2539101	2540224	275673	276757	SPCC736.04c	SPBC32H8.06	gma12	mug93	-	pi018|SPACTOKYO_453.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.644954962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784315	2539101	2543522	275673	279940	SPCC736.04c	SPAPB24D3.08c	gma12	SPAPB24D3.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818146098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784316	2539101	2539027	275673	275600	SPCC736.04c	SPCC1322.08	gma12	srk1	-	mkp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63319656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784317	2539101	5802861	275673	857999	SPCC736.04c	SPAC1D4.01	gma12	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322549746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784318	2539101	2542919	275673	279360	SPCC736.04c	SPAC6C3.08	gma12	nas6	-	SPAC6C3.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504344292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784319	2539101	2540019	275673	276563	SPCC736.04c	SPBC1685.01	gma12	pmp1	-	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.74119994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784320	2539101	2540201	275673	276734	SPCC736.04c	SPBC13A2.04c	gma12	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324424203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784321	2539101	2541708	275673	278203	SPCC736.04c	SPAC31A2.02	gma12	trm112	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.772778773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784322	2539101	2541464	275673	277966	SPCC736.04c	SPAC222.08c	gma12	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.552281535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784323	2539101	2541961	275673	278448	SPCC736.04c	SPAC23C4.02	gma12	crn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385575166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784324	2539101	2542597	275673	279051	SPCC736.04c	SPAP8A3.07c	gma12	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.621641558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784325	2539101	2539847	275673	276395	SPCC736.04c	SPBC530.14c	gma12	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.743001797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784326	2539101	2540599	275673	277125	SPCC736.04c	SPBC29A3.10c	gma12	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701317195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784327	2539101	2542773	275673	279222	SPCC736.04c	SPAC16.01	gma12	rho2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.699246377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784328	2539101	2541296	275673	277808	SPCC736.04c	SPBP8B7.06	gma12	rpp201	-	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.773892535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784329	2539101	2542060	275673	278538	SPCC736.04c	SPAC23C11.14	gma12	zhf1	-	zhf	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.150689619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784330	2539101	2542255	275673	278725	SPCC736.04c	SPAC57A7.08	gma12	pzh1	-	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323967974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784331	2539101	2539993	275673	276537	SPCC736.04c	SPBC1105.05	gma12	exg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449982682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784332	2539101	2539853	275673	276401	SPCC736.04c	SPBC1347.07	gma12	rex2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.058788327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784333	2539101	2542781	275673	279230	SPCC736.04c	SPAC57A10.12c	gma12	ura3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.570156345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784334	2539101	2541742	275673	278236	SPCC736.04c	SPAC22H10.09	gma12	SPAC22H10.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.42071336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784335	2539101	2540946	275673	277462	SPCC736.04c	SPBC36.04	gma12	cys11	-	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.227146444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784336	2539101	2539877	275673	276423	SPCC736.04c	SPBC16G5.07c	gma12	SPBC16G5.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514743634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784337	2539101	2542283	275673	278751	SPCC736.04c	SPAC27F1.08	gma12	pdt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.887121337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784338	2539101	2539686	275673	276241	SPCC736.04c	SPBC1734.06	gma12	rhp18	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036202013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784339	2539101	2540706	275673	277229	SPCC736.04c	SPBC19C7.12c	gma12	omh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.713886904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784340	2539101	2539438	275673	276001	SPCC736.04c	SPCC4B3.07	gma12	nro1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.520705466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784341	2539101	2538815	275673	275396	SPCC736.04c	SPCC1322.15	gma12	rpl3402	-	rpl34|rpl34-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.505415315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784342	2539101	2540498	275673	277026	SPCC736.04c	SPBC27.02c	gma12	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38332087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784343	2539101	2542881	275673	279326	SPCC736.04c	SPAC13F5.03c	gma12	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.679068109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784344	2539101	2542515	275673	278973	SPCC736.04c	SPAC1952.09c	gma12	SPAC1952.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851225758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784345	2539101	2540800	275673	277319	SPCC736.04c	SPBC409.20c	gma12	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388587441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784346	2539101	2543304	275673	279728	SPCC736.04c	SPAC6B12.12	gma12	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.19688608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784347	2539101	2540702	275673	277226	SPCC736.04c	SPBC19F8.03c	gma12	yap18	-	SPBC19F8.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.983812019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784348	2539101	2543192	275673	279621	SPCC736.04c	SPAC343.18	gma12	rfp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819535334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784349	2539101	2541531	275673	278031	SPCC736.04c	SPAC25A8.01c	gma12	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773202168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784350	2539101	2540654	275673	277179	SPCC736.04c	SPBC19F5.01c	gma12	puc1	-	SPBP8B7.32c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.467266777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784351	2539101	2542025	275673	278507	SPCC736.04c	SPAC23C11.01	gma12	SPAC23C11.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.983685088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784352	2539101	2541948	275673	278435	SPCC736.04c	SPAC222.13c	gma12	SPAC222.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.132720131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784353	2539101	2540829	275673	277347	SPCC736.04c	SPBC800.09	gma12	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.56251396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784354	2539101	2539318	275673	275884	SPCC736.04c	SPCC1919.07	gma12	SPCC1919.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.630802298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784355	2539101	2540974	275673	277490	SPCC736.04c	SPBC405.03c	gma12	SPBC405.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.68546087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784356	2539101	2538915	275673	275492	SPCC736.04c	SPCC23B6.02c	gma12	SPCC23B6.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.03065643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784357	2539101	2542918	275673	279359	SPCC736.04c	SPAC12G12.12	gma12	SPAC12G12.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.742705111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784358	2539101	2543420	275673	279842	SPCC736.04c	SPAC3H1.04c	gma12	mdm31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711985872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784359	2539101	2542416	275673	278880	SPCC736.04c	SPAC589.03c	gma12	SPAC589.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.678495605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784360	2539101	2543056	275673	279490	SPCC736.04c	SPAC3A11.04	gma12	SPAC3A11.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.401237937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784361	2539101	2539920	275673	276464	SPCC736.04c	SPBC119.08	gma12	pmk1	-	spm1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.024017578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784362	2539101	2539483	275673	276046	SPCC736.04c	SPCC584.02	gma12	cuf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.337309135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784363	2539101	2539253	275673	275823	SPCC736.04c	SPCC1827.03c	gma12	SPCC1827.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327717781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784364	2539101	2543220	275673	279648	SPCC736.04c	SPAPB21F2.02	gma12	SPAPB21F2.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328779858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784365	2539101	2540070	275673	276608	SPCC736.04c	SPBC119.04	gma12	mei3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327033955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784366	2539101	2541646	275673	278142	SPCC736.04c	SPAC750.06c	gma12	SPAC750.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.912208378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784367	2539101	2540383	275673	276912	SPCC736.04c	SPBC31E1.02c	gma12	pmr1	-	cps5|pgak2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.186809618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784368	2539101	3361295	275673	280371	SPCC736.04c	SPBC1921.01c	gma12	rpl35b	-	rpl37|rpl37-1|rpl3701|SPBC29C10.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864593838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784369	2539101	2541576	275673	278073	SPCC736.04c	SPBC1348.02	gma12	SPBC1348.02	-	SPAC1348.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.54942224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784370	2539101	2541116	275673	277631	SPCC736.04c	SPBC609.04	gma12	caf5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810029424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784371	2538959	2539202	275533	275773	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC162.10	cds1	ppk33	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570527891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784372	2538959	2542776	275533	279225	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC167.01	cds1	ire1	-	ppk4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51401006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784373	2538959	2540338	275533	276867	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC2G2.13c	cds1	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.366660037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784374	2538959	2539363	275533	275929	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC613.02	cds1	SPCC613.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.698989062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784375	2538959	2539137	275533	275709	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC1682.08c	cds1	mcp2	-	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573265107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784376	2538959	2539545	275533	276106	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC4B3.12	cds1	set9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448267885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784377	2538959	2541806	275533	278297	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC4G8.13c	cds1	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319236643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784378	2538959	2539259	275533	275829	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC553.05c	cds1	wtf6	-	SPCC553.05c|SPCC553.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703875734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784379	2538959	2542879	275533	279324	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC13G7.07	cds1	arb2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.057641168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784380	2540031	2542207	276574	278682	SPBC1198.14c	SPAC17H9.10c	fbp1	ddb1	SPBC660.04c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981087971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784381	2540031	2540913	276574	277429	SPBC1198.14c	SPBC56F2.08c	fbp1	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBC660.04c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.059181487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784382	2540031	2540131	276574	276668	SPBC1198.14c	SPBC1778.05c	fbp1	SPBC1778.05c	SPBC660.04c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.878150824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784383	2540031	2540524	276574	277052	SPBC1198.14c	SPBC21B10.08c	fbp1	SPBC21B10.08c	SPBC660.04c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867609416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784384	2540031	2541117	276574	277632	SPBC1198.14c	SPBC646.13	fbp1	sds23	SPBC660.04c	moc1|psp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.816182358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784385	2540031	2541766	276574	278260	SPBC1198.14c	SPAC139.04c	fbp1	fap2	SPBC660.04c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097691756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784386	2540031	2542050	276574	278529	SPBC1198.14c	SPAC212.02	fbp1	SPAC212.02	SPBC660.04c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.568002375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784387	2540031	2539434	276574	275997	SPBC1198.14c	SPCC757.09c	fbp1	rnc1	SPBC660.04c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.344942765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784388	2540031	2538845	276574	275426	SPBC1198.14c	SPCC1235.13	fbp1	ght6	SPBC660.04c	meu12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709053607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784389	2540031	2543412	276574	279834	SPBC1198.14c	SPAC637.07	fbp1	moe1	SPBC660.04c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817606684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784390	2540031	2540326	276574	276856	SPBC1198.14c	SPBC2G5.06c	fbp1	hmt2	SPBC660.04c	cad1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.33034458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784391	2540031	2542933	276574	279374	SPBC1198.14c	SPAPYUG7.06	fbp1	sdu1	SPBC660.04c	mug67|hag1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812638231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784392	2540031	2541542	276574	278042	SPBC1198.14c	SPAC4G9.02	fbp1	rnh201	SPBC660.04c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925764372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784393	2540031	2539317	276574	275883	SPBC1198.14c	SPCC16A11.08	fbp1	atg20	SPBC660.04c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04735652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784394	2540031	2539160	276574	275732	SPBC1198.14c	SPCC18.17c	fbp1	SPCC18.17c	SPBC660.04c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.413402423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784395	2540031	2543096	276574	279528	SPBC1198.14c	SPAC977.05c	fbp1	SPAC977.05c	SPBC660.04c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.32658674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784396	2540031	2541432	276574	277937	SPBC1198.14c	SPAC1F5.05c	fbp1	mso1	SPBC660.04c	SPAC1F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.266750735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784397	2540031	2541531	276574	278031	SPBC1198.14c	SPAC25A8.01c	fbp1	fft3	SPBC660.04c	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.414721217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784398	2540031	2542403	276574	278867	SPBC1198.14c	SPAC19A8.05c	fbp1	sst4	SPBC660.04c	vps27	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201831312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784399	2540031	2540333	276574	276863	SPBC1198.14c	SPBC21B10.07	fbp1	SPBC21B10.07	SPBC660.04c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812906177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784400	2540031	2541774	276574	278268	SPBC1198.14c	SPAC22E12.05c	fbp1	rer1	SPBC660.04c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.15191805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784401	2540031	2543387	276574	279809	SPBC1198.14c	SPAPB1E7.02c	fbp1	mcl1	SPBC660.04c	slr3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811519832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784402	2540031	2542175	276574	278650	SPBC1198.14c	SPAC1F3.02c	fbp1	mkh1	SPBC660.04c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039201714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784403	2540031	2542111	276574	278587	SPBC1198.14c	SPAC1687.14c	fbp1	SPAC1687.14c	SPBC660.04c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872608867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784404	2539552	2541562	276113	278061	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC24B11.05	vps5	SPAC24B11.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575255096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784405	2539552	2540105	276113	276642	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC106.04	vps5	ada1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.327575778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784406	2539552	2543617	276113	280031	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC4A8.10	vps5	SPAC4A8.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.280158549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784407	2539552	2542723	276113	279174	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC25H1.03	vps5	atg101	-	mug66	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.492481487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784408	2539552	2541343	276113	277854	SPCPJ732.01	SPBPB2B2.19c	vps5	SPBPB2B2.19c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.687483537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784409	2539552	2541426	276113	277931	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC227.06	vps5	SPAC227.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.918962291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784410	2539552	2540524	276113	277052	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC21B10.08c	vps5	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.628559367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784411	2539552	3361561	276113	280637	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC11E3.01c	vps5	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.633325763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784412	2539552	2539068	276113	275640	SPCPJ732.01	SPCC1442.11c	vps5	SPCC1442.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4723202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784413	2539552	2541345	276113	277856	SPCPJ732.01	SPBP35G2.07	vps5	ilv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.262207534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784414	2539552	5802945	276113	858083	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC19G12.16c	vps5	adg2	-	SPAC23A1.01c|mug46	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.626539947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784415	2539552	2542103	276113	278579	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC31G5.11	vps5	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.690736372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784416	2539552	2540535	276113	277062	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC215.01	vps5	SPBC215.01	-	SPBC3B9.20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.760897713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784417	2539552	3361375	276113	280451	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC212.06c	vps5	SPAC212.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331012524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784418	2539552	2542035	276113	278517	SPCPJ732.01	SPAP8A3.04c	vps5	hsp9	-	scf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.87103711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784419	2539552	2541200	276113	277714	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC8D2.03c	vps5	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386681363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784420	2539552	2542677	276113	279130	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC26F1.10c	vps5	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.903686099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784421	2539552	2541012	276113	277527	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC3H7.12	vps5	rav2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.24895034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784422	2539552	2541058	276113	277573	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC3H7.09	vps5	erf2	-	mug142	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.692666626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784423	2539552	2543590	276113	280005	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC4C5.03	vps5	SPAC4C5.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.067736412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784424	2539552	2540029	276113	276573	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC16A3.01	vps5	spn3	-	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.337281372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784425	2539552	2543316	276113	279740	SPCPJ732.01	SPAPJ691.02	vps5	SPAPJ691.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.856076452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784426	2539552	2542299	276113	278766	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC18B11.10	vps5	tup11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.518335631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784427	2539552	2542689	276113	279142	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC29B12.04	vps5	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383871151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784428	2539552	2542724	276113	279175	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC767.01c	vps5	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.979320485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784429	2539552	2543453	276113	279873	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC3G9.03	vps5	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.62788296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784430	2539552	3361381	276113	280457	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC12G12.01c	vps5	SPAC12G12.01c	-	SPAC630.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.630739041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784431	2539552	2543048	276113	279483	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC3F10.02c	vps5	trk1	-	sptrk	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.277020511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784432	2539552	2541119	276113	277634	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC651.11c	vps5	apm3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.810313067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784433	2539552	2539895	276113	276441	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC1683.10c	vps5	pcl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.399634579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784434	2539552	2541323	276113	277835	SPCPJ732.01	SPBP35G2.14	vps5	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.092487636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784435	2539552	2541527	276113	278027	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC31A2.09c	vps5	apm4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.581725359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784436	2539552	2542220	276113	278694	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC1A6.03c	vps5	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.56367105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784437	2539552	2541311	276113	277823	SPCPJ732.01	SPBP8B7.09c	vps5	los1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197477203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784438	2539552	2539648	276113	276203	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC1198.08	vps5	SPBC1198.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.564023273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784439	2539552	2541522	276113	278023	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC23E2.01	vps5	fep1	-	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.2552742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784440	2539552	2543426	276113	279846	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC631.02	vps5	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.836785601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784441	2539552	2541663	276113	278159	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC22G7.08	vps5	ppk8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.335891619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784442	2539552	2540893	276113	277409	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC543.10	vps5	get1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.629335747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784443	2539552	2543573	276113	279988	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC869.11	vps5	cat1	-	SPAC922.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.477566336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784444	2539552	3361461	276113	280537	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC11H11.01	vps5	sst6	-	cps23	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.380106632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784445	2539552	2543537	276113	279954	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC4D7.05	vps5	sum1	-	tif34	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.824671996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784446	2539552	2543020	276113	279456	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC10F6.13c	vps5	SPAC10F6.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.133810108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784447	2539552	2539355	276113	275921	SPCPJ732.01	SPCC1840.08c	vps5	pdi5	-	SPCC1840.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.074615073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784448	2539552	2540631	276113	277157	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC25B2.10	vps5	SPBC25B2.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.33177117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784449	2539552	2541250	276113	277764	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC8D2.17	vps5	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.259420379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784450	2539552	2541093	276113	277608	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC646.08c	vps5	SPBC646.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.334972705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784451	2539552	2541784	276113	278277	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC2E1P3.01	vps5	SPAC2E1P3.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.723313271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784452	2539552	3361491	276113	280567	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC1805.08	vps5	dlc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.785156856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784453	2539552	2543412	276113	279834	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC637.07	vps5	moe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.656305757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784454	2539552	2540673	276113	277198	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC1D7.03	vps5	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.698387672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784455	2539552	2542543	276113	279000	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC30D11.11	vps5	SPAC30D11.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.224281367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784456	2539552	2541578	276113	278075	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC25B8.05	vps5	deg1	-	SPAC25B8.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.462356576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784457	2539552	2541911	276113	278401	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC212.04c	vps5	SPAC212.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.05788548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784458	2539552	2542168	276113	278643	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC17A5.16	vps5	ftp105	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.581457354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784459	2539552	2542989	276113	279427	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC11E3.13c	vps5	gas5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.866665431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784460	2539552	2541876	276113	278366	SPCPJ732.01	SPAP27G11.11c	vps5	SPAP27G11.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.462359783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784461	2539552	2542873	276113	279318	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC9G1.02	vps5	wis4	-	wak1|wik1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.195720722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784462	2539552	2542522	276113	278980	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC19A8.03	vps5	ymr1	-	SPAC19A8.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.208810783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784463	2539552	2541183	276113	277697	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC725.14	vps5	arg6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.376008814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784464	2539552	2543643	276113	280057	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC3G9.07c	vps5	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.515310499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784465	2539552	2540801	276113	277320	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC18H10.10c	vps5	saf4	-	cwc16|cwf16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868811475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784466	2539552	2543250	276113	279678	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC3G9.15c	vps5	fcf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.034647665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784467	2539552	2539284	276113	275852	SPCPJ732.01	SPCC584.15c	vps5	SPCC584.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.836595786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784468	2539552	2542419	276113	278882	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC17G6.05c	vps5	bro1	-	SPAC17G6.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.545223985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784469	2539552	2539815	276113	276365	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC1105.02c	vps5	lys4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.50400509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784470	2539552	2539850	276113	276398	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC15D4.07c	vps5	atg9	-	apg9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.997521054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784471	2539552	2541542	276113	278042	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC4G9.02	vps5	rnh201	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81986249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784472	2539552	2541903	276113	278393	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC22F8.05	vps5	SPAC22F8.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44303631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784473	2539552	2542431	276113	278893	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC1A6.01c	vps5	SPAC1A6.01c	-	SPAC23C4.20c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934161843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784474	2539552	2542254	276113	278724	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC30D11.04c	vps5	nup124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.927934825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784475	2539552	2539408	276113	275973	SPCPJ732.01	SPCC576.12c	vps5	mhf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704791824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784476	2539552	2542519	276113	278977	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC19G12.08	vps5	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.279209853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784477	2539552	5802861	276113	857999	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC1D4.01	vps5	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.638907328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784478	2539552	2543683	276113	280097	SPCPJ732.01	SPAPB1E7.04c	vps5	SPAPB1E7.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.751063108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784479	2539552	2543561	276113	279977	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC922.04	vps5	SPAC922.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.561705752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784480	2539552	2542008	276113	278491	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC2G11.07c	vps5	ptc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.974755008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784481	2539552	2540184	276113	276717	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC106.12c	vps5	SPBC106.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.841186192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784482	2539552	2541395	276113	277904	SPCPJ732.01	SPBP8B7.25	vps5	cyp4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864713216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784483	2539552	2543315	276113	279739	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC6B12.07c	vps5	SPAC6B12.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.628383268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784484	2539552	2539427	276113	275992	SPCPJ732.01	SPCC663.15c	vps5	SPCC663.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.578801538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784485	2539552	2543390	276113	279812	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC631.01c	vps5	acp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.030810629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784486	2539552	2541337	276113	277848	SPCPJ732.01	SPBP35G2.13c	vps5	swc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.806327939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784487	2539552	3361134	276113	280210	SPCPJ732.01	SPCC737.09c	vps5	hmt1	-	SPCC74.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.434407252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784488	2539552	2542781	276113	279230	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC57A10.12c	vps5	ura3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773508047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784489	2539552	2540703	276113	277227	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC20F10.07	vps5	SPBC20F10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.523421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784490	2539552	2542725	276113	279176	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC3A12.10	vps5	rpl2001	-	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.688177621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784491	2539552	2541525	276113	278025	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC27D7.02c	vps5	SPAC27D7.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.404182415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784492	2539552	2540001	276113	276545	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC1289.13c	vps5	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.790185631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784493	2539552	2542283	276113	278751	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC27F1.08	vps5	pdt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.930267659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784494	2539552	2542286	276113	278754	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC1786.01c	vps5	ptl2	-	SPAC1786.01c|SPAC31G5.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.374268678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784495	2539552	2542881	276113	279326	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC13F5.03c	vps5	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.416143339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784496	2539552	2539925	276113	276469	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC16H5.13	vps5	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.689337587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784497	2539552	2540814	276113	277333	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC4B4.10c	vps5	atg5	-	mug77	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.865958504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784498	2539552	2539600	276113	276158	SPCPJ732.01	SPCP1E11.03	vps5	mug170	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.585342419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784499	2539552	2540800	276113	277319	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC409.20c	vps5	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.452457595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784500	2539552	2540152	276113	276688	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC12C2.03c	vps5	SPBC12C2.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.309798174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784501	2539552	2540881	276113	277398	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC577.14c	vps5	spa1	-	spa	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.309502993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784502	2539552	2542940	276113	279381	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC31A2.12	vps5	SPAC31A2.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.67612606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784503	2539552	2543096	276113	279528	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC977.05c	vps5	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.377549612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784504	2539552	2540733	276113	277256	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC4.01	vps5	dni2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.371822223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784505	2539552	2540935	276113	277451	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC359.04c	vps5	pfl7	-	SPBC359.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820069473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784506	2539552	2543066	276113	279499	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC343.12	vps5	rds1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.917599558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784507	2539552	2541459	276113	277961	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC227.11c	vps5	SPAC227.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201288392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784508	2539552	2540725	276113	277248	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC215.14c	vps5	vps20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.395280843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784509	2539552	2540346	276113	276875	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC2F12.03c	vps5	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440028526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784510	2539552	2540829	276113	277347	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC800.09	vps5	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.182435771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784511	2539552	3361329	276113	280405	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC25H2.10c	vps5	SPBC25H2.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.394822707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784512	2539552	2542918	276113	279359	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC12G12.12	vps5	SPAC12G12.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513323366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784513	2539552	2543091	276113	279524	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC12G12.15	vps5	sif3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.207626888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784514	2539552	2539722	276113	276275	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC14F5.11c	vps5	mug186	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.393041058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784515	2539552	2542222	276113	278695	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC31G5.18c	vps5	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.826705562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784516	2539552	2541404	276113	277913	SPCPJ732.01	SPBPB2B2.18	vps5	SPBPB2B2.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.293651613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784517	2539552	2540516	276113	277044	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC21C3.01c	vps5	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453395883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784518	2539552	2543183	276113	279612	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC3A12.06c	vps5	SPAC3A12.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.852968302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784519	2539552	2542416	276113	278880	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC589.03c	vps5	SPAC589.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.863954628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784520	2539552	2538795	276113	275376	SPCPJ732.01	SPCC1884.01	vps5	SPCC1884.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327000908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784521	2539552	2541744	276113	278238	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC23A1.02c	vps5	SPAC23A1.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.747290739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784522	2539552	2541757	276113	278251	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC2F7.10	vps5	akr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.97263408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784523	2539552	2543124	276113	279556	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC3A11.06	vps5	mvp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.551440877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784524	2539552	2543525	276113	279943	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC4A8.14	vps5	SPAC4A8.14	-	prs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.843262406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784525	2539552	3361165	276113	280241	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC1348.12	vps5	SPBC1348.12	-	SPAC1348.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.497622974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784526	2539552	2543220	276113	279648	SPCPJ732.01	SPAPB21F2.02	vps5	SPAPB21F2.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.790506071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784527	2539552	2543400	276113	279822	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC3G9.11c	vps5	SPAC3G9.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.347070889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784528	2539552	2541357	276113	277868	SPCPJ732.01	SPBPB7E8.01	vps5	SPBPB7E8.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.875361102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784529	2539552	2543384	276113	279806	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC637.06	vps5	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.964399238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784530	2539552	2541806	276113	278297	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC4G8.13c	vps5	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.880096269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784531	2539552	2543327	276113	279750	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC1D4.06c	vps5	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.756012396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784532	2539552	2541627	276113	278123	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC1F5.08c	vps5	yam8	-	ehs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.920421604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784533	2539552	2538854	276113	275435	SPCPJ732.01	SPCP1E11.05c	vps5	are2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.013260634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784534	2539552	2540828	276113	277346	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC4B4.06	vps5	vps25	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.645677506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784535	2539552	2542795	276113	279243	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC9G1.05	vps5	aip1	-	SPAC9G1.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866698255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784536	2539552	2542700	276113	279153	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC26H5.08c	vps5	bgl2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.980502388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784537	2539552	2543090	276113	279523	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC1348.01	vps5	SPBC1348.01	-	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.340395776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784538	2539552	2540383	276113	276912	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC31E1.02c	vps5	pmr1	-	cps5|pgak2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.12137911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784539	2539552	2540938	276113	277454	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC365.14c	vps5	uge1	-	gal10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.559359057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784540	2539552	2543472	276113	279892	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC959.04c	vps5	omh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.520096823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784541	2539552	2540208	276113	276741	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC9B6.03	vps5	SPBC9B6.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320892527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784542	2539552	2541297	276113	277809	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC9B6.07	vps5	nop52	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.985000957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784543	2539552	2542617	276113	279071	SPCPJ732.01	SPAC13A11.01c	vps5	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.625117742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784544	2539552	2540734	276113	277257	SPCPJ732.01	SPBC19G7.09	vps5	ulp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.130428361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784545	2539058	2541488	275631	277990	SPCC126.07c	SPAC227.17c	pbr1	SPAC227.17c	SPCC126.07c|asr1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.557051739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784546	2539058	2541050	275631	277565	SPCC126.07c	SPBC428.05c	pbr1	arg12	SPCC126.07c|asr1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094668473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784547	2542207	2539050	278682	275623	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC11E10.08	ddb1	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.946292789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784548	2542207	2538721	278682	275305	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC1494.10	ddb1	adn3	-	SPCC70.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51834217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784549	2542207	2539841	278682	276389	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC17D1.05	ddb1	SPBC17D1.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767805243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784550	2542207	2540060	278682	276598	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC106.01	ddb1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.771002013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784551	2542207	2541826	278682	278317	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC2G11.13	ddb1	atg22	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.062603054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784552	2542207	2539405	278682	275970	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC553.03	ddb1	pex1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701089419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784553	2542207	2540885	278682	277402	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC660.14	ddb1	mik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.736864157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784554	2542207	2540833	278682	277351	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC18H10.20c	ddb1	any1	-	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454378955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784555	2542207	2542518	278682	278976	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC1B3.16c	ddb1	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.313852996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784556	2542207	2541343	278682	277854	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBPB2B2.19c	ddb1	SPBPB2B2.19c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.267798871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784557	2542207	2540913	278682	277429	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC56F2.08c	ddb1	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.372231416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784558	2542207	2539940	278682	276484	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC16A3.10	ddb1	SPBC16A3.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576569454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784559	2542207	2540956	278682	277472	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC409.06	ddb1	uch2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.509502187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784560	2542207	2538977	278682	275551	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC1020.06c	ddb1	tal1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.26778553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784561	2542207	2542378	278682	278842	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC1805.04	ddb1	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.257063495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784562	2542207	2540528	278682	277056	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC18H10.04c	ddb1	sce3	-	tif48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991442872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784563	2542207	2541135	278682	277650	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC839.03c	ddb1	SPBC839.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.440765719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784564	2542207	2539930	278682	276474	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC1198.11c	ddb1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.031262397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784565	2542207	3361561	278682	280637	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC11E3.01c	ddb1	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.841434492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784566	2542207	2539939	278682	276483	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC11G11.01	ddb1	fis1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807986293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784567	2542207	2540099	278682	276637	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC16H5.11c	ddb1	skb1	-	rmt5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.677584768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784568	2542207	2540433	278682	276961	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC2D10.06	ddb1	rep1	-	rec16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.196935566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784569	2542207	2541117	278682	277632	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC646.13	ddb1	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445015019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784570	2542207	2542502	278682	278960	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC139.06	ddb1	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.908159496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784571	2542207	2543572	278682	279987	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC4G8.04	ddb1	SPAC4G8.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641309974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784572	2542207	2543164	278682	279595	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC3G6.06c	ddb1	rad2	-	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.431659198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784573	2542207	2543434	278682	279854	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC8F11.02c	ddb1	dph3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.127416068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784574	2542207	2540686	278682	277211	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC21D10.10	ddb1	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.543235846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784575	2542207	2539309	278682	275876	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC4G3.19	ddb1	alp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.357943807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784576	2542207	2539210	278682	275780	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC2H8.05c	ddb1	dbl1	-	SPCC2H8.05c|SPCC63.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.892181583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784577	2542207	2539226	278682	275796	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC16C4.20c	ddb1	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.482101287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784578	2542207	2539420	278682	275985	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC970.07c	ddb1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.087821398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784579	2542207	2541408	278682	277916	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBPB2B2.14c	ddb1	SPBPB2B2.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.848699095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784580	2542207	2541208	278682	277722	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC887.04c	ddb1	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.416882228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784581	2542207	2538775	278682	275357	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC23B6.05c	ddb1	ssb3	-	rpa3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.644824201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784582	2542207	2542816	278682	279263	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC4G8.11c	ddb1	atp10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877337898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784583	2542207	2540251	278682	276783	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC336.05c	ddb1	SPBC336.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.123049092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784584	2542207	2542696	278682	279149	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC29B12.03	ddb1	spd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.094617123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784585	2542207	2539472	278682	276035	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC794.03	ddb1	SPCC794.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.625688061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784586	2542207	2539256	278682	275826	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC285.04	ddb1	SPCC285.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636303124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784587	2542207	2540945	278682	277461	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC342.06c	ddb1	rtt109	-	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.37068687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784588	2542207	2543111	278682	279543	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC806.07	ddb1	ndk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.937385673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784589	2542207	2539331	278682	275897	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC24B10.09	ddb1	rps1702	-	rps17|rps17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322235668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784590	2542207	2539117	278682	275689	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC74.06	ddb1	mak3	-	phk2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.768463716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784591	2542207	2539015	278682	275588	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC1183.02	ddb1	SPCC1183.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.558928473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784592	2542207	2541119	278682	277634	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC651.11c	ddb1	apm3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.566912495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784593	2542207	2541045	278682	277560	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC543.03c	ddb1	pku80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.343033781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784594	2542207	2540727	278682	277250	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC1921.03c	ddb1	mex67	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.174700497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784595	2542207	2542318	278682	278784	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC16C9.05	ddb1	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.918226484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784596	2542207	2541560	278682	278059	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC24B11.12c	ddb1	SPAC24B11.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872840401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784597	2542207	2541436	278682	277941	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC11H11.03c	ddb1	SPAC11H11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444355178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784598	2542207	2540467	278682	276995	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC2G2.07c	ddb1	mug178	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871627614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784599	2542207	2539823	278682	276373	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC16A3.18	ddb1	cip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.707892236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784600	2542207	2540595	278682	277121	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC21C3.02c	ddb1	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.542859508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784601	2542207	2541643	278682	278139	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC14C4.13	ddb1	rad17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.348168568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784602	2542207	2541580	278682	278077	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC1687.05	ddb1	pli1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.008002591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784603	2542207	2543108	278682	279540	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC3A12.13c	ddb1	SPAC3A12.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.648295831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784604	2542207	2539244	278682	275814	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC1672.06c	ddb1	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.563093557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784605	2542207	2541522	278682	278023	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC23E2.01	ddb1	fep1	-	gaf2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819581907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784606	2542207	2543584	278682	279999	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAPB1E7.11c	ddb1	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.878506895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784607	2542207	2538906	278682	275483	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC1259.03	ddb1	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.425716044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784608	2542207	2540825	278682	277343	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC428.08c	ddb1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.689175574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784609	2542207	2541926	278682	278414	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC222.14c	ddb1	SPAC222.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.466937954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784610	2542207	2542558	278682	279014	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC1952.07	ddb1	rad1	-	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913681533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784611	2542207	2541021	278682	277536	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC3B8.10c	ddb1	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.907671673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784612	2542207	2539032	278682	275605	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC4B3.05c	ddb1	hem12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.93384758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784613	2542207	2543514	278682	279932	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC4D7.03	ddb1	pop2	-	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.034927498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784614	2542207	2542596	278682	279050	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC1B3.17	ddb1	clr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.509077665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784615	2542207	2539870	278682	276416	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC1709.18	ddb1	tif452	-	SPBC409.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.616755126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784616	2542207	2540797	278682	277316	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC18H10.11c	ddb1	ppr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196994269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784617	2542207	2542964	278682	279404	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC12G12.07c	ddb1	SPAC12G12.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703344782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784618	2542207	2541801	278682	278292	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC2F7.08c	ddb1	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.414814385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784619	2542207	2540892	278682	277408	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC530.01	ddb1	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.774274525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784620	2542207	2540401	278682	276929	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC2A9.02	ddb1	SPBC2A9.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98407526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784621	2542207	2539845	278682	276393	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC12C2.02c	ddb1	ste20	-	ste16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.023987953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784622	2542207	2543483	278682	279903	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAPB2B4.02	ddb1	grx5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.316775732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784623	2542207	2538706	278682	275290	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC338.08	ddb1	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.403118208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784624	2542207	2539898	278682	276444	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC12D12.07c	ddb1	trx2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147338923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784625	2542207	2541520	278682	278021	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC2E1P5.03	ddb1	SPAC2E1P5.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.45619914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784626	2542207	2541435	278682	277940	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC2E1P5.02c	ddb1	mug109	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.057366563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784627	2542207	2541496	278682	277998	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC23D3.09	ddb1	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.052453849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784628	2542207	2543363	278682	279785	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAPB24D3.09c	ddb1	pdr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814768288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784629	2542207	2538994	278682	275568	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC553.01c	ddb1	dbl2	-	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.913974545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784630	2542207	2541532	278682	278032	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC2C4.15c	ddb1	ubx2	-	ucp13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381500934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784631	2542207	2543396	278682	279818	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC4D7.11	ddb1	dsc4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.34468548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784632	2542207	2539995	278682	276539	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC1105.09	ddb1	ubc15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.096090081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784633	2542207	2542126	278682	278602	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC1B3.05	ddb1	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.073414631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784634	2542207	2540261	278682	276792	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC543.05c	ddb1	SPBC543.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.93430683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784635	2542207	2540751	278682	277273	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC20F10.10	ddb1	psl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.698418904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784636	2542207	2540427	278682	276955	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC2A9.13	ddb1	SPBC2A9.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.505215229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784637	2542207	2543236	278682	279664	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC8C9.04	ddb1	SPAC8C9.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384968655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784638	2542207	2541248	278682	277762	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC8D2.10c	ddb1	rmt3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778462155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784639	2542207	2538935	278682	275511	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC1682.11c	ddb1	ctl1	-	SPCC1682.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.259653451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784640	2542207	2539408	278682	275973	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC576.12c	ddb1	mhf2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.151624499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784641	2542207	2539481	278682	276044	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC622.16c	ddb1	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.298138813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784642	2542207	2539215	278682	275785	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC285.16c	ddb1	msh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.075239108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784643	2542207	2542056	278682	278535	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC6G9.14	ddb1	SPAC6G9.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.322692602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784644	2542207	2541389	278682	277900	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBPB2B2.09c	ddb1	SPBPB2B2.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.705741335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784645	2542207	2539368	278682	275934	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC16A11.07	ddb1	coq10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812756878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784646	2542207	2541708	278682	278203	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC31A2.02	ddb1	trm112	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.678564034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784647	2542207	2540342	278682	276871	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC2G2.01c	ddb1	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81797473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784648	2542207	2540180	278682	276713	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC16D10.11c	ddb1	rps1801	-	rps18-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.849875406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784649	2542207	2542267	278682	278736	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAPYUK71.03c	ddb1	syn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.497032045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784650	2542207	2543517	278682	279935	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC3G9.05	ddb1	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444384875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784651	2542207	2538828	278682	275409	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC1020.05	ddb1	SPCC1020.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.206714667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784652	2542207	2540016	278682	276560	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC1773.09c	ddb1	mug184	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514024692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784653	2542207	2541266	278682	277780	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBP16F5.05c	ddb1	yar1	-	SPBP16F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.252905794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784654	2542207	2538690	278682	275275	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC1393.05	ddb1	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.691981933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784655	2542207	2539812	278682	276362	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC1347.02	ddb1	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.349593628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784656	2542207	2540193	278682	276726	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC1289.10c	ddb1	adn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.143676547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784657	2542207	2541337	278682	277848	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBP35G2.13c	ddb1	swc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.560133379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784658	2542207	2541378	278682	277889	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBP8B7.21	ddb1	ubp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.297305313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784659	2542207	2540930	278682	277446	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC354.10	ddb1	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.616874921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784660	2542207	2540691	278682	277216	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC20F10.05	ddb1	nrl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.702238144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784661	2542207	2540946	278682	277462	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC36.04	ddb1	cys11	-	cys1a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814144723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784662	2542207	2541713	278682	278208	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC3A12.12	ddb1	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.266716098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784663	2542207	2540821	278682	277339	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC800.03	ddb1	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.409196072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784664	2542207	2540910	278682	277426	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC577.02	ddb1	rpl3801	-	rpl38-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.617652099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784665	2542207	2542198	278682	278673	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC6F12.09	ddb1	rdp1	-	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.185213075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784666	2542207	2541798	278682	278289	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC22F3.03c	ddb1	rdh54	-	mug34|tid1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049799125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784667	2542207	2539555	278682	276116	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC4B3.08	ddb1	lsg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.687932152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784668	2542207	2542327	278682	278793	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC16C9.06c	ddb1	upf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.401339519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784669	2542207	2540619	278682	277145	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC25H2.15	ddb1	SPBC25H2.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.564567429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784670	2542207	2542286	278682	278754	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC1786.01c	ddb1	ptl2	-	SPAC1786.01c|SPAC31G5.20c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040474545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784671	2542207	2539438	278682	276001	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC4B3.07	ddb1	nro1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.115850649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784672	2542207	2541175	278682	277689	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC839.13c	ddb1	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.169507704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784673	2542207	2540671	278682	277196	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC215.10	ddb1	SPBC215.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446618089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784674	2542207	2540498	278682	277026	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC27.02c	ddb1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.76560156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784675	2542207	2540800	278682	277319	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC409.20c	ddb1	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.542438138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784676	2542207	2538717	278682	275301	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC1235.02	ddb1	bio2	-	SPCC320.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.911931977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784677	2542207	2542113	278682	278589	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC1B3.11c	ddb1	ypt4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.257940189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784678	2542207	2540998	278682	277514	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC3D6.05	ddb1	ptp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567316721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784679	2542207	2540960	278682	277476	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC3D6.02	ddb1	but2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.93435381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784680	2542207	2543130	278682	279562	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC869.05c	ddb1	SPAC869.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.771053235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784681	2542207	2541432	278682	277937	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC1F5.05c	ddb1	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.777039214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784682	2542207	2540115	278682	276652	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC1778.02	ddb1	rap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.476955566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784683	2542207	2540346	278682	276875	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC2F12.03c	ddb1	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.726795164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784684	2542207	2539013	278682	275586	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC364.03	ddb1	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.868744967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784685	2542207	2542418	278682	278881	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC1805.07c	ddb1	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.23092488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784686	2542207	2539514	278682	276076	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC663.14c	ddb1	trp663	-	SPCC663.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820463879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784687	2542207	2539668	278682	276223	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC11B10.10c	ddb1	pht1	-	pi001	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.294247412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784688	2542207	2543602	278682	280017	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAPB1A11.04c	ddb1	mca1	-	SPAPB1A11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.124876978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784689	2542207	2540992	278682	277508	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC342.05	ddb1	crb2	-	rhp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.946438672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784690	2542207	2543109	278682	279541	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC3G6.09c	ddb1	tps2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.080105761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784691	2542207	2543672	278682	280086	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC4H3.01	ddb1	SPAC4H3.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.69229641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784692	2542207	2540927	278682	277443	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC365.06	ddb1	pmt3	-	smt3|ubl2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.219574886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784693	2542207	2538694	278682	275279	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC191.09c	ddb1	gst1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.084410232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784694	2542207	2539702	278682	276255	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC1604.12	ddb1	SPBC1604.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.316199874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784695	2542207	2542904	278682	279348	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC144.11	ddb1	rps1102	-	rps11|rps11-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.253994647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784696	2542207	2539410	278682	275975	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC4G3.17	ddb1	SPCC4G3.17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.019561564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784697	2542207	2539375	278682	275941	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC4G3.11	ddb1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.396570055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784698	2542207	2539901	278682	276447	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC17A3.08	ddb1	SPBC17A3.08	-	pi038	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913662343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784699	2542207	2538840	278682	275421	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC736.07c	ddb1	SPCC736.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.680580518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784700	2542207	2539189	278682	275760	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC1682.16	ddb1	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.635663907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784701	2542207	2543337	278682	279760	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC959.08	ddb1	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.264524994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784702	2542207	3361410	278682	280486	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC1527.01	ddb1	mok11	-	SPAC23D3.15	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780168281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784703	2542207	2539700	278682	276253	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC1685.15c	ddb1	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.170092662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784704	2542207	2541806	278682	278297	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC4G8.13c	ddb1	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.237366547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784705	2542207	2543387	278682	279809	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAPB1E7.02c	ddb1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.046446938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784706	2542207	2543327	278682	279750	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC1D4.06c	ddb1	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.475362006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784707	2542207	2543471	278682	279891	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC513.07	ddb1	SPAC513.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706947428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784708	2542207	2542175	278682	278650	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC1F3.02c	ddb1	mkh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.196841316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784709	2542207	2540314	278682	276844	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC2G5.03	ddb1	ctu1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.254408522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784710	2542207	2542424	278682	278886	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC1805.14	ddb1	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780847239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784711	2542207	2538834	278682	275415	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC126.08c	ddb1	SPCC126.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.70041478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784712	2542207	2541320	278682	277832	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC1271.03c	ddb1	SPBC1271.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.292351967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784713	2542207	2543090	278682	279523	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC1348.01	ddb1	SPBC1348.01	-	SPAC1348.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.206060881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784714	2542207	2543448	278682	279868	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC3H5.07	ddb1	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572898203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784715	2542207	2542943	278682	279384	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC1348.03	ddb1	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.944959533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784716	2542207	2542680	278682	279133	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC26F1.09	ddb1	gyp51	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699177504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784717	2542207	2542594	278682	279048	SPAC17H9.10c	SPACUNK4.10	ddb1	SPACUNK4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448880339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784718	2542207	2543646	278682	280060	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC821.07c	ddb1	moc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.063892918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784719	2542207	2541297	278682	277809	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC9B6.07	ddb1	nop52	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.312487627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784720	2542207	2540787	278682	277306	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC1921.07c	ddb1	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.479152465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784721	2542207	2540736	278682	277259	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC19F8.02	ddb1	SPBC19F8.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.471305223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784722	2542732	2540060	279182	276598	SPAC25G10.07c	SPBC106.01	cut7	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.77842011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784723	2542732	2540533	279182	277061	SPAC25G10.07c	SPBC29A10.16c	cut7	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.72163798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784724	2542732	3361389	279182	280465	SPAC25G10.07c	SPAC977.13c	cut7	SPAC977.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.289500929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784725	2542732	2540498	279182	277026	SPAC25G10.07c	SPBC27.02c	cut7	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.527194869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784726	2542732	2542418	279182	278881	SPAC25G10.07c	SPAC1805.07c	cut7	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.32153465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784727	2542732	2538869	279182	275449	SPAC25G10.07c	SPCC777.02	cut7	SPCC777.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569924406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784728	2539014	2540060	275587	276598	SPCC18B5.05c	SPBC106.01	SPCC18B5.05c	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.515981544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784729	2539014	2542277	275587	278746	SPCC18B5.05c	SPAC17A5.02c	SPCC18B5.05c	dbr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.890998047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784730	2539014	2543319	275587	279743	SPCC18B5.05c	SPAC6B12.09	SPCC18B5.05c	trm10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.369966437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784731	2539014	2540893	275587	277409	SPCC18B5.05c	SPBC543.10	SPCC18B5.05c	get1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.741605921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784732	2539014	2541943	275587	278430	SPCC18B5.05c	SPAC222.07c	SPCC18B5.05c	hri2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.45226829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784733	2539014	2538852	275587	275433	SPCC18B5.05c	SPCC4E9.01c	SPCC18B5.05c	rec11	-	SPCC550.16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699411896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784734	2539014	2540261	275587	276792	SPCC18B5.05c	SPBC543.05c	SPCC18B5.05c	SPBC543.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992046149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784735	2539014	2540997	275587	277513	SPCC18B5.05c	SPBC3H7.06c	SPCC18B5.05c	pof9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.593810369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784736	2539014	2539958	275587	276502	SPCC18B5.05c	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC18B5.05c	zfs1	-	moc4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820861718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784737	2539014	2541900	275587	278390	SPCC18B5.05c	SPAC23H4.17c	SPCC18B5.05c	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.276861754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784738	2539014	2542725	275587	279176	SPCC18B5.05c	SPAC3A12.10	SPCC18B5.05c	rpl2001	-	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.378381214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784739	2539014	2543304	275587	279728	SPCC18B5.05c	SPAC6B12.12	SPCC18B5.05c	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.659915589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784740	2539014	2540278	275587	276809	SPCC18B5.05c	SPBC1A4.04	SPCC18B5.05c	SPBC1A4.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935370008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784741	2539014	2542444	275587	278906	SPCC18B5.05c	SPAC17A5.05c	SPCC18B5.05c	SPAC17A5.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.100984733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784742	2541871	2542207	278361	278682	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC17H9.10c	res2	ddb1	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.444658177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784743	2541871	2540060	278361	276598	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC106.01	res2	mph1	mcs1|pct1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994516524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784744	2541871	2538961	278361	275535	SPAC22F3.09c	SPCC285.14	res2	trs130	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767259271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784745	2541871	2542291	278361	278759	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC17C9.08	res2	pnu1	mcs1|pct1	end1|nuc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.838443765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784746	2541871	2541512	278361	278013	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC11E3.08c	res2	nse6	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.626377382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784747	2541871	2540913	278361	277429	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC56F2.08c	res2	SPBC56F2.08c	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.165451843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784748	2541871	2538977	278361	275551	SPAC22F3.09c	SPCC1020.06c	res2	tal1	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934455851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784749	2541871	2542127	278361	278603	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC1952.12c	res2	csn71	mcs1|pct1	csn7|csn7a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867200671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784750	2541871	2543064	278361	279497	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC3G6.01	res2	hrp3	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.167758281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784751	2541871	2542378	278361	278842	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC1805.04	res2	nup132	mcs1|pct1	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381331502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784752	2541871	2540528	278361	277056	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC18H10.04c	res2	sce3	mcs1|pct1	tif48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.608757085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784753	2541871	2539282	278361	275850	SPAC22F3.09c	SPCC622.06c	res2	SPCC622.06c	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.252252282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784754	2541871	2538993	278361	275567	SPAC22F3.09c	SPCC162.12	res2	tco89	mcs1|pct1	SPCC1753.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869210383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784755	2541871	2539930	278361	276474	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC1198.11c	res2	reb1	mcs1|pct1	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.171639642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784756	2541871	2541104	278361	277619	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC6B1.03c	res2	SPBC6B1.03c	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.144215052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784757	2541871	2541188	278361	277702	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC83.16c	res2	SPBC83.16c	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152407126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784758	2541871	2541345	278361	277856	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBP35G2.07	res2	ilv1	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.190331588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784759	2541871	2540474	278361	277002	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC26H8.09c	res2	snf59	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.330910477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784760	2541871	2543164	278361	279595	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC3G6.06c	res2	rad2	mcs1|pct1	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992744656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784761	2541871	2542103	278361	278579	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC31G5.11	res2	pac2	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707809163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784762	2541871	2540717	278361	277240	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC577.12	res2	dph6	mcs1|pct1	mug71	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.93547047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784763	2541871	2539332	278361	275898	SPAC22F3.09c	SPCPB1C11.01	res2	amt1	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.661606995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784764	2541871	2542107	278361	278583	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC30.01c	res2	sec72	mcs1|pct1	sec7b|sec702	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094568201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784765	2541871	2540979	278361	277495	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC3H7.10	res2	elp6	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.808720987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784766	2541871	2542641	278361	279095	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC24C9.15c	res2	spn5	mcs1|pct1	mde9|meu28	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.917417502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784767	2541871	2541058	278361	277573	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC3H7.09	res2	erf2	mcs1|pct1	mug142	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.409696849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784768	2541871	2543659	278361	280073	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC922.07c	res2	atd2	mcs1|pct1	SPAC922.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514423108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784769	2541871	2540306	278361	276836	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC2G5.02c	res2	ckb2	mcs1|pct1	SPBC2G5.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714225063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784770	2541871	2541026	278361	277541	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC337.09	res2	erg28	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.687860093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784771	2541871	2540220	278361	276753	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC337.03	res2	rhn1	mcs1|pct1	SPBC337.03|iss4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867257189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784772	2541871	2543030	278361	279466	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC12B10.10	res2	nod1	mcs1|pct1	SPAC12B10.10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.837755184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784773	2541871	2543048	278361	279483	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC3F10.02c	res2	trk1	mcs1|pct1	sptrk	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199484142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784774	2541871	2539937	278361	276481	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC1539.08	res2	arf6	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.830376422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784775	2541871	2540727	278361	277250	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC1921.03c	res2	mex67	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.985931791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784776	2541871	2539895	278361	276441	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC1683.10c	res2	pcl1	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321731784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784777	2541871	2540425	278361	276953	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC27.06c	res2	mgr2	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.849185211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784778	2541871	2542277	278361	278746	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC17A5.02c	res2	dbr1	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.978941129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784779	2541871	2541960	278361	278447	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC6G9.15c	res2	SPAC6G9.15c	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.273611273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784780	2541871	2543108	278361	279540	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC3A12.13c	res2	SPAC3A12.13c	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.845657316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784781	2541871	2543641	278361	280055	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC3H5.08c	res2	SPAC3H5.08c	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769183768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784782	2541871	2538698	278361	275283	SPAC22F3.09c	SPCC1442.02	res2	SPCC1442.02	mcs1|pct1	SPCC1450.18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925788314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784783	2541871	2543584	278361	279999	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAPB1E7.11c	res2	SPAPB1E7.11c	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.061104455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784784	2541871	2538927	278361	275503	SPAC22F3.09c	SPCC1795.09	res2	yps1	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984949435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784785	2541871	2543426	278361	279846	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC631.02	res2	bdf2	mcs1|pct1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923685196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784786	2541871	2539352	278361	275918	SPAC22F3.09c	SPCC188.07	res2	ccq1	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701166676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784787	2541871	2539092	278361	275664	SPAC22F3.09c	SPCC1259.08	res2	SPCC1259.08	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194188049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784788	2541871	2540825	278361	277343	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC428.08c	res2	clr4	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813781502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784789	2541871	2541021	278361	277536	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC3B8.10c	res2	nem1	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.812378444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784790	2541871	2542554	278361	279011	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC1952.03	res2	otu2	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.428298624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784791	2541871	2542036	278361	278518	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC23A1.19c	res2	hrq1	mcs1|pct1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.539502021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784792	2541871	2542950	278361	279390	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC12B10.03	res2	bun62	mcs1|pct1	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516211037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784793	2541871	2539870	278361	276416	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC1709.18	res2	tif452	mcs1|pct1	SPBC409.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326395292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784794	2541871	2541249	278361	277763	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC947.01	res2	alf1	mcs1|pct1	SPBC947.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.14666622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784795	2541871	2542707	278361	279160	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC25G10.03	res2	zip1	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.20524449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784796	2541871	2538770	278361	275353	SPAC22F3.09c	SPCC1753.02c	res2	git3	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.72277466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784797	2541871	2538706	278361	275290	SPAC22F3.09c	SPCC338.08	res2	ctp1	mcs1|pct1	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.681906563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784798	2541871	2539733	278361	276285	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC16E9.12c	res2	pab2	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.720575985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784799	2541871	2542971	278361	279410	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC105.02c	res2	SPAC105.02c	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.921607898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784800	2541871	2540363	278361	276892	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC2F12.09c	res2	atf21	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.51503742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784801	2541871	2542989	278361	279427	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC11E3.13c	res2	gas5	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868236739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784802	2541871	2540403	278361	276931	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC21D10.11c	res2	nfs1	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384647324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784803	2541871	2542921	278361	279362	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC1093.01	res2	ppr5	mcs1|pct1	SPAC12B10.18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81675553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784804	2541871	2542521	278361	278979	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC18G6.12c	res2	SPAC18G6.12c	mcs1|pct1	B22918-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.446141579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784805	2541871	2543667	278361	280081	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC4H3.02c	res2	swc3	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462372531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784806	2541871	2541166	278361	277681	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC725.15	res2	ura5	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980566336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784807	2541871	2539857	278361	276404	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC1604.20c	res2	tea2	mcs1|pct1	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704996375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784808	2541871	2540086	278361	276624	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC16H5.12c	res2	SPBC16H5.12c	mcs1|pct1	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.560510103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784809	2541871	2543244	278361	279672	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC6B12.06c	res2	rrg9	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.43613172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784810	2541871	2540265	278361	276796	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC3E7.12c	res2	cfh4	mcs1|pct1	chr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.923536334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784811	2541871	2539974	278361	276518	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC32H8.07	res2	git5	mcs1|pct1	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.204291591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784812	2541871	2541720	278361	278214	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC23H3.13c	res2	gpa2	mcs1|pct1	git8	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.61803798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784813	2541871	2540836	278361	277354	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC18H10.19	res2	vps38	mcs1|pct1	atg14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.077111284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784814	2541871	2541900	278361	278390	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC23H4.17c	res2	srb10	mcs1|pct1	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.922526614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784815	2541871	2539715	278361	276268	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC1778.09	res2	SPBC1778.09	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.620153908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784816	2541871	2542439	278361	278901	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC17A5.08	res2	erp2	mcs1|pct1	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983934788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784817	2541871	2538708	278361	275292	SPAC22F3.09c	SPCC594.01	res2	SPCC594.01	mcs1|pct1	SPCC736.16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983669608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784818	2541871	2541479	278361	277981	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC27F1.06c	res2	SPAC27F1.06c	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.625851982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784819	2541871	2542773	278361	279222	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC16.01	res2	rho2	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.806897595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784820	2541871	2541680	278361	278176	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC22F8.09	res2	rrp16	mcs1|pct1	nop53	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769007916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784821	2541871	3361105	278361	280181	SPAC22F3.09c	SPCC188.10c	res2	SPCC188.10c	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.713713221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784822	2541871	2539213	278361	275783	SPAC22F3.09c	SPCC285.10c	res2	SPCC285.10c	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.537753676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784823	2541871	2542255	278361	278725	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC57A7.08	res2	pzh1	mcs1|pct1	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451083452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784824	2541871	2539812	278361	276362	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC1347.02	res2	fkbp39	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.326338257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784825	2541871	2541337	278361	277848	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBP35G2.13c	res2	swc2	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.024264457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784826	2541871	2541896	278361	278386	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC23H4.16c	res2	SPAC23H4.16c	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814308096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784827	2541871	2541017	278361	277532	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC36.07	res2	elp1	mcs1|pct1	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.913102865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784828	2541871	2539631	278361	276187	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC16G5.16	res2	SPBC16G5.16	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813962939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784829	2541871	2543113	278361	279545	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC3F10.07c	res2	erf4	mcs1|pct1	mug91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455032308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784830	2541871	2539082	278361	275654	SPAC22F3.09c	SPCC126.03	res2	pus1	mcs1|pct1	lps1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036461413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784831	2541871	2543670	278361	280084	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAPB1E7.06c	res2	eme1	mcs1|pct1	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378459549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784832	2541871	2541981	278361	278466	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC23A1.04c	res2	mnl1	mcs1|pct1	htm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57148193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784833	2541871	2539925	278361	276469	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC16H5.13	res2	SPBC16H5.13	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815870949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784834	2541871	2540800	278361	277319	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC409.20c	res2	psh3	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.953979779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784835	2541871	2540998	278361	277514	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC3D6.05	res2	ptp4	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.26481144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784836	2541871	2539614	278361	276172	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC17D11.08	res2	SPBC17D11.08	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145161022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784837	2541871	2541367	278361	277878	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBP8B7.13	res2	vac7	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036419846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784838	2541871	2541531	278361	278031	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC25A8.01c	res2	fft3	mcs1|pct1	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.202959654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784839	2541871	2540325	278361	276855	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC21B10.10	res2	rps402	mcs1|pct1	rps4-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.332525321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784840	2541871	2540164	278361	276699	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC1683.03c	res2	SPBC1683.03c	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.485486631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784841	2541871	2539514	278361	276076	SPAC22F3.09c	SPCC663.14c	res2	trp663	mcs1|pct1	SPCC663.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925959892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784842	2541871	2541789	278361	278281	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC23H4.08	res2	iwr1	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143678812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784843	2541871	2540182	278361	276715	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC16G5.06	res2	SPBC16G5.06	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813704304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784844	2541871	2543420	278361	279842	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC3H1.04c	res2	mdm31	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567194063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784845	2541871	2541744	278361	278238	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC23A1.02c	res2	SPAC23A1.02c	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.915902138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784846	2541871	2538787	278361	275368	SPAC22F3.09c	SPCC364.02c	res2	bis1	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.251953475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784847	2541871	2543044	278361	279479	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC3C7.12	res2	tip1	mcs1|pct1	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.920423015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784848	2541871	2539702	278361	276255	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC1604.12	res2	SPBC1604.12	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.753334595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784849	2541871	2539726	278361	276278	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC13E7.08c	res2	leo1	mcs1|pct1	SPBC13E7.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.336489412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784850	2541871	2542021	278361	278504	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAP14E8.02	res2	tos4	mcs1|pct1	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.981519396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784851	2541871	2542886	278361	279331	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC1486.01	res2	SPAC1486.01	mcs1|pct1	sod2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871625298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784852	2541871	2542795	278361	279243	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC9G1.05	res2	aip1	mcs1|pct1	SPAC9G1.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.682640138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784853	2541871	2541050	278361	277565	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC428.05c	res2	arg12	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865816621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784854	2541871	2540309	278361	276839	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC21B10.13c	res2	yox1	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.338498523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784855	2541871	2543624	278361	280038	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC4D7.06c	res2	SPAC4D7.06c	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.053016634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784856	2541871	2542087	278361	278564	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC26F1.02	res2	pnn1	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933966011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784857	2541871	2541732	278361	278226	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC22H10.08	res2	SPAC22H10.08	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816981552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784858	2541871	2542094	278361	278571	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC29B12.06c	res2	rcd1	mcs1|pct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645957769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784859	2541871	2541116	278361	277631	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC609.04	res2	caf5	mcs1|pct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096132245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784860	2541871	2542571	278361	279027	SPAC22F3.09c	SPAC589.02c	res2	med13	mcs1|pct1	spTrap240|srb9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.83523871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784861	2541871	2540649	278361	277174	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC19F8.08	res2	rps401	mcs1|pct1	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870659068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784862	2542289	2540886	278757	277403	SPAC17G6.03	SPBC4F6.10	SPAC17G6.03	vps901	-	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.50618302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784863	2542289	2539293	278757	275861	SPAC17G6.03	SPCC553.08c	SPAC17G6.03	ria1	-	SPCC553.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.529937375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784864	2542289	2539160	278757	275732	SPAC17G6.03	SPCC18.17c	SPAC17G6.03	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508403751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784865	2542289	2542769	278757	279219	SPAC17G6.03	SPAC15A10.10	SPAC17G6.03	mde6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.922973242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784866	2542228	2541998	278701	278482	SPAC823.03	SPAC23A1.09	ppk15	SPAC23A1.09	SPAC1E11.03	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817799335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784867	2542228	2542554	278701	279011	SPAC823.03	SPAC1952.03	ppk15	otu2	SPAC1E11.03	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147455418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784868	2542228	2542268	278701	278737	SPAC823.03	SPAC17A5.07c	ppk15	ulp2	SPAC1E11.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.881973739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784869	2542228	2541578	278701	278075	SPAC823.03	SPAC25B8.05	ppk15	deg1	SPAC1E11.03	SPAC25B8.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.669969463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784870	2542228	2541911	278701	278401	SPAC823.03	SPAC212.04c	ppk15	SPAC212.04c	SPAC1E11.03	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143913255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784871	2542228	2542357	278701	278822	SPAC823.03	SPAC1782.07	ppk15	qcr8	SPAC1E11.03	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817384125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784872	2542228	2543643	278701	280057	SPAC823.03	SPAC3G9.07c	ppk15	hos2	SPAC1E11.03	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390329947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784873	2542228	2539958	278701	276502	SPAC823.03	SPBC1718.07c	ppk15	zfs1	SPAC1E11.03	moc4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820992795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784874	2542228	2539215	278701	275785	SPAC823.03	SPCC285.16c	ppk15	msh6	SPAC1E11.03	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929219948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784875	2542228	2541142	278701	277657	SPAC823.03	SPBC725.04	ppk15	SPBC725.04	SPAC1E11.03	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869174432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784876	2542228	2540882	278701	277399	SPAC823.03	SPBC4F6.08c	ppk15	mrpl39	SPAC1E11.03	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81153289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784877	2542228	2540061	278701	276599	SPAC823.03	SPBC119.12	ppk15	rud3	SPAC1E11.03	SPBC119.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928327245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784878	2542228	2543624	278701	280038	SPAC823.03	SPAC4D7.06c	ppk15	SPAC4D7.06c	SPAC1E11.03	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815261249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784879	2539483	2538939	276046	275514	SPCC584.02	SPCC1672.04c	cuf2	SPCC1672.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05133711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784880	2539483	2538796	276046	275377	SPCC584.02	SPCC63.06	cuf2	SPCC63.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379520584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784881	2539483	2542577	276046	279033	SPCC584.02	SPAC19G12.15c	cuf2	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.056062258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784882	2539483	2542643	276046	279097	SPCC584.02	SPAC2C4.07c	cuf2	dis32	-	SPAC2C4.07c|dis3L2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816370188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784883	2539483	2539332	276046	275898	SPCC584.02	SPCPB1C11.01	cuf2	amt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.774673954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784884	2539483	2541951	276046	278438	SPCC584.02	SPAC222.05c	cuf2	mss1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.848979785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784885	2539483	2542816	276046	279263	SPCC584.02	SPAC4G8.11c	cuf2	atp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.441199908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784886	2539483	2539197	276046	275768	SPCC584.02	SPCC24B10.14c	cuf2	xlf1	-	mug104|nej1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.324307327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784887	2539483	2540023	276046	276567	SPCC584.02	SPBC11C11.10	cuf2	SPBC11C11.10	-	SPBC3B8.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.432837538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784888	2539483	2539388	276046	275953	SPCC584.02	SPCC24B10.12	cuf2	cgi121	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.004191181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784889	2539483	2540797	276046	277316	SPCC584.02	SPBC18H10.11c	cuf2	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.687918988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784890	2539483	2542513	276046	278971	SPCC584.02	SPAC1952.05	cuf2	gcn5	-	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.782526185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784891	2539483	2539898	276046	276444	SPCC584.02	SPBC12D12.07c	cuf2	trx2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385253212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784892	2539483	2538871	276046	275450	SPCC584.02	SPCC1259.14c	cuf2	meu27	-	B8647-6	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.881562489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784893	2539483	2543101	276046	279533	SPCC584.02	SPAC323.03c	cuf2	SPAC323.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.501455153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784894	2539483	2539233	276046	275803	SPCC584.02	SPCC16A11.03c	cuf2	SPCC16A11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.120947454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784895	2539483	2541720	276046	278214	SPCC584.02	SPAC23H3.13c	cuf2	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505332985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784896	2539483	2541708	276046	278203	SPCC584.02	SPAC31A2.02	cuf2	trm112	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711613312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784897	2539483	2540229	276046	276761	SPCC584.02	SPBC31F10.15c	cuf2	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.68070536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784898	2539483	2541488	276046	277990	SPCC584.02	SPAC227.17c	cuf2	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.560591825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784899	2539483	2539519	276046	276081	SPCC584.02	SPCC364.05	cuf2	vps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708020186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784900	2539483	2540918	276046	277434	SPCC584.02	SPBC800.02	cuf2	whi5	-	mug54	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.938150045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784901	2539483	2539101	276046	275673	SPCC584.02	SPCC736.04c	cuf2	gma12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.337309135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784902	2539483	2541909	276046	278399	SPCC584.02	SPAC227.01c	cuf2	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.810322088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784903	2539483	2539375	276046	275941	SPCC584.02	SPCC4G3.11	cuf2	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.541366635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784904	2539483	2541062	276046	277577	SPCC584.02	SPBC660.11	cuf2	tcg1	-	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.77441827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784905	2542023	2539050	278506	275623	SPAC20H4.10	SPCC11E10.08	ufd2	rik1	SPAC145.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.931609266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784906	2542023	2538796	278506	275377	SPAC20H4.10	SPCC63.06	ufd2	SPCC63.06	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.55959219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784907	2542023	2543529	278506	279947	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC4C5.02c	ufd2	ryh1	SPAC145.04	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.446178439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784908	2542023	2542585	278506	279040	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC31A2.13c	ufd2	sft1	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.565254882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784909	2542023	2539949	278506	276493	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC1703.04	ufd2	mlh1	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.11744582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784910	2542023	2541399	278506	277908	SPAC20H4.10	SPBPB10D8.01	ufd2	SPBPB10D8.01	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929045161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784911	2542023	2543211	278506	279640	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC12B10.15c	ufd2	SPAC12B10.15c	SPAC145.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.916566108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784912	2542023	2539301	278506	275869	SPAC20H4.10	SPCC622.03c	ufd2	SPCC622.03c	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09755722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784913	2542023	2539202	278506	275773	SPAC20H4.10	SPCC162.10	ufd2	ppk33	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039776672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784914	2542023	3361561	278506	280637	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC11E3.01c	ufd2	swr1	SPAC145.04	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1662248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784915	2542023	2541723	278506	278217	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC22H12.01c	ufd2	mug35	SPAC145.04	SPAC23G3.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153200882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784916	2542023	2541438	278506	277943	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC23G3.10c	ufd2	ssr3	SPAC145.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.698455715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784917	2542023	2540296	278506	276827	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC2D10.05	ufd2	exg3	SPAC145.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509933669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784918	2542023	2543432	278506	279852	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC4G8.05	ufd2	ppk14	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.401443339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784919	2542023	2541733	278506	278227	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC27F1.03c	ufd2	uch1	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.083995914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784920	2542023	2542986	278506	279424	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC11D3.14c	ufd2	SPAC11D3.14c	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98837626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784921	2542023	2542103	278506	278579	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC31G5.11	ufd2	pac2	SPAC145.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.199985069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784922	2542023	2540826	278506	277344	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC409.17c	ufd2	SPBC409.17c	SPAC145.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9243239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784923	2542023	2540043	278506	276581	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC1198.12	ufd2	mfr1	SPAC145.04	SPBC660.02|fzr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.347756436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784924	2542023	2539226	278506	275796	SPAC20H4.10	SPCC16C4.20c	ufd2	SPCC16C4.20c	SPAC145.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.409398253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784925	2542023	2541208	278506	277722	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC887.04c	ufd2	lub1	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992714582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784926	2542023	2542641	278506	279095	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC24C9.15c	ufd2	spn5	SPAC145.04	mde9|meu28	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992203755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784927	2542023	2542053	278506	278532	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC2F3.07c	ufd2	SPAC2F3.07c	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928892358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784928	2542023	2542689	278506	279142	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC29B12.04	ufd2	snz1	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154023026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784929	2542023	2543453	278506	279873	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC3G9.03	ufd2	rpl2301	SPAC145.04	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.234694803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784930	2542023	2543053	278506	279487	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC10F6.15	ufd2	SPAC10F6.15	SPAC145.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510207723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784931	2542023	3361381	278506	280457	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC12G12.01c	ufd2	SPAC12G12.01c	SPAC145.04	SPAC630.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.074597523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784932	2542023	2540929	278506	277445	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC354.03	ufd2	swd3	SPAC145.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641317324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784933	2542023	2541119	278506	277634	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC651.11c	ufd2	apm3	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205418562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784934	2542023	2542220	278506	278694	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC1A6.03c	ufd2	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC145.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.305586229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784935	2542023	2543296	278506	279721	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC9E9.03	ufd2	leu2	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.562004154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784936	2542023	2541923	278506	278411	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC23C4.09c	ufd2	SPAC23C4.09c	SPAC145.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392152117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784937	2542023	2538845	278506	275426	SPAC20H4.10	SPCC1235.13	ufd2	ght6	SPAC145.04	meu12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045155978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784938	2542023	2541021	278506	277536	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC3B8.10c	ufd2	nem1	SPAC145.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713882359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784939	2542023	2542331	278506	278797	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC1834.05	ufd2	alg9	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809708609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784940	2542023	2542311	278506	278777	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC16A10.05c	ufd2	dad1	SPAC145.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.364759258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784941	2542023	2543020	278506	279456	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC10F6.13c	ufd2	SPAC10F6.13c	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.407204242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784942	2542023	2540892	278506	277408	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC530.01	ufd2	gyp1	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931829381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784943	2542023	2540903	278506	277419	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC530.05	ufd2	prt1	SPAC145.04	SPBC530.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.261242698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784944	2542023	2538770	278506	275353	SPAC20H4.10	SPCC1753.02c	ufd2	git3	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152743146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784945	2542023	2540150	278506	276687	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC16E9.14c	ufd2	zrg17	SPAC145.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.569756154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784946	2542023	2542464	278506	278925	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC1A6.09c	ufd2	lag1	SPAC145.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.998647687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784947	2542023	2539667	278506	276222	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC13G1.08c	ufd2	ash2	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.084886521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784948	2542023	2543178	278506	279608	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC31G5.15	ufd2	psd3	SPAC145.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.683175211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784949	2542023	2539974	278506	276518	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC32H8.07	ufd2	git5	SPAC145.04	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.329528031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784950	2542023	2543378	278506	279800	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC3H8.07c	ufd2	pac10	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.254330519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784951	2542023	2542855	278506	279301	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC144.04c	ufd2	spe1	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930735249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784952	2542023	2542712	278506	279165	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC25B8.17	ufd2	SPAC25B8.17	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.403192876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784953	2542023	2542813	278506	279260	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC29B12.11c	ufd2	SPAC29B12.11c	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809914159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784954	2542023	2541954	278506	278441	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC23C4.05c	ufd2	SPAC23C4.05c	SPAC145.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851389734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784955	2542023	2541536	278506	278036	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC1071.02	ufd2	mms19	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091960661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784956	2542023	2541464	278506	277966	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC222.08c	ufd2	SPAC222.08c	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.66233372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784957	2542023	2541961	278506	278448	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC23C4.02	ufd2	crn1	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.249333905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784958	2542023	2542597	278506	279051	SPAC20H4.10	SPAP8A3.07c	ufd2	SPAP8A3.07c	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.671176216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784959	2542023	2540533	278506	277061	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC29A10.16c	ufd2	SPBC29A10.16c	SPAC145.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380304267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784960	2542023	2541614	278506	278111	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC29A4.20	ufd2	elp3	SPAC145.04	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.898479722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784961	2542023	2543009	278506	279447	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC10F6.06	ufd2	vip1	SPAC145.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.231858954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784962	2542023	2541713	278506	278208	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC3A12.12	ufd2	atp11	SPAC145.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647151951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784963	2542023	2540821	278506	277339	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC800.03	ufd2	clr3	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.555010847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784964	2542023	2540001	278506	276545	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC1289.13c	ufd2	gmh6	SPAC145.04	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.543533064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784965	2542023	2541222	278506	277736	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC887.08	ufd2	SPBC887.08	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931913215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784966	2542023	2538762	278506	275345	SPAC20H4.10	SPCC306.04c	ufd2	set1	SPAC145.04	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.315389152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784967	2542023	2542516	278506	278974	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC2F7.04	ufd2	pmc2	SPAC145.04	med1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.345464506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784968	2542023	2542286	278506	278754	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC1786.01c	ufd2	ptl2	SPAC145.04	SPAC1786.01c|SPAC31G5.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978583695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784969	2542023	2543106	278506	279538	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC3A11.13	ufd2	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC145.04	SPAC3H5.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.657353038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784970	2542023	2540498	278506	277026	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC27.02c	ufd2	ask1	SPAC145.04	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.731665321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784971	2542023	2540800	278506	277319	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC409.20c	ufd2	psh3	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.720101096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784972	2542023	2541027	278506	277542	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC409.16c	ufd2	saw1	SPAC145.04	SPBC409.16c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92564409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784973	2542023	2539346	278506	275912	SPAC20H4.10	SPCC569.04	ufd2	SPCC569.04	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262584233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784974	2542023	2542306	278506	278773	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC29A4.11	ufd2	rga3	SPAC145.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.816199638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784975	2542023	2539013	278506	275586	SPAC20H4.10	SPCC364.03	ufd2	rpl1702	SPAC145.04	rpl17|rpl17-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099059727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784976	2542023	2541229	278506	277743	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC839.05c	ufd2	rps1701	SPAC145.04	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820579438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784977	2542023	2541149	278506	277664	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC651.03c	ufd2	gyp10	SPAC145.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319464763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784978	2542023	2539729	278506	276281	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC11B10.07c	ufd2	ivn1	SPAC145.04	pi004|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.987045075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784979	2542023	2540516	278506	277044	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC21C3.01c	ufd2	vps13a	SPAC145.04	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.804250894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784980	2542023	2542250	278506	278720	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC17D4.03c	ufd2	cis4	SPAC145.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.073554666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784981	2542023	2539920	278506	276464	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC119.08	ufd2	pmk1	SPAC145.04	spm1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.51501789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784982	2542023	2539178	278506	275749	SPAC20H4.10	SPCC1682.14	ufd2	rpl1902	SPAC145.04	rpl19-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.872863759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784983	2542023	2542059	278506	278537	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC328.06	ufd2	ubp2	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.502173785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784984	2542023	2541946	278506	278433	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC2G11.04	ufd2	SPAC2G11.04	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.198152655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784985	2542023	2543384	278506	279806	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC637.06	ufd2	gmh5	SPAC145.04	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981223583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784986	2542023	2542109	278506	278585	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC1687.16c	ufd2	erg31	SPAC145.04	erg3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.842494721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784987	2542023	2540360	278506	276889	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC2G5.01	ufd2	SPBC2G5.01	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.80744735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784988	2542023	2542111	278506	278587	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC1687.14c	ufd2	SPAC1687.14c	SPAC145.04	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.9367517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784989	2542023	2543090	278506	279523	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC1348.01	ufd2	SPBC1348.01	SPAC145.04	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.949763504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784990	2542023	2541062	278506	277577	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC660.11	ufd2	tcg1	SPAC145.04	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.139948846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784991	2542023	2539001	278506	275575	SPAC20H4.10	SPCC1494.08c	ufd2	SPCC1494.08c	SPAC145.04	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.132184662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784992	2541270	2542237	277784	278709	SPBC902.02c	SPAC19E9.02	ctf18	fin1	chl12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.453078789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784993	2541270	2539309	277784	275876	SPBC902.02c	SPCC4G3.19	ctf18	alp16	chl12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.643571921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784994	2541270	2540425	277784	276953	SPBC902.02c	SPBC27.06c	ctf18	mgr2	chl12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92652984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784995	2541270	2542318	277784	278784	SPBC902.02c	SPAC16C9.05	ctf18	cph1	chl12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.77453613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784996	2541270	2540595	277784	277121	SPBC902.02c	SPBC21C3.02c	ctf18	dep1	chl12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.908133249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784997	2541270	2542177	277784	278652	SPBC902.02c	SPAC17H9.08	ctf18	SPAC17H9.08	chl12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.334373264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784998	2541270	2541545	277784	278045	SPBC902.02c	SPAC22F8.07c	ctf18	rtf1	chl12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.266440201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
784999	2541270	2539219	277784	275789	SPBC902.02c	SPCC1795.01c	ctf18	mad3	chl12	SPCC895.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.192701806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785000	2541270	2541096	277784	277611	SPBC902.02c	SPBC725.10	ctf18	SPBC725.10	chl12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991343353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785001	2541270	2542597	277784	279051	SPBC902.02c	SPAP8A3.07c	ctf18	SPAP8A3.07c	chl12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.689736016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785002	2541270	2540229	277784	276761	SPBC902.02c	SPBC31F10.15c	ctf18	atp15	chl12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872739685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785003	2541270	2539527	277784	276089	SPBC902.02c	SPCC338.16	ctf18	pof3	chl12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.348031194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785004	2541270	2540589	277784	277115	SPBC902.02c	SPBC20F10.06	ctf18	mad2	chl12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.753473686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785005	2541270	2539908	277784	276454	SPBC902.02c	SPBC13E7.06	ctf18	msd1	chl12	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.285961159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785006	2541270	2539354	277784	275920	SPBC902.02c	SPCC4F11.03c	ctf18	SPCC4F11.03c	chl12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387034021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785007	2541270	2540498	277784	277026	SPBC902.02c	SPBC27.02c	ctf18	ask1	chl12	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.690823269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785008	2541270	2542418	277784	278881	SPBC902.02c	SPAC1805.07c	ctf18	dad2	chl12	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.955785067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785009	2541270	2543387	277784	279809	SPBC902.02c	SPAPB1E7.02c	ctf18	mcl1	chl12	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.987037058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785010	2541270	2540320	277784	276850	SPBC902.02c	SPBC3D6.04c	ctf18	mad1	chl12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.846304935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785011	3361506	2540235	280582	276767	SPAC17G8.09	SPBC336.13c	shg1	SPBC336.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.28225658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785012	3361506	2543064	280582	279497	SPAC17G8.09	SPAC3G6.01	shg1	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.063216429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785013	3361506	2540745	280582	277268	SPAC17G8.09	SPBC21C3.18	shg1	spo4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.856923471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785014	3361506	2542701	280582	279154	SPAC17G8.09	SPAC26H5.05	shg1	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047077692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785015	3361506	2540455	280582	276983	SPAC17G8.09	SPBC215.05	shg1	gpd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.440503301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785016	3361506	2538806	280582	275387	SPAC17G8.09	SPCC1840.09	shg1	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.686824007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785017	3361506	2543681	280582	280095	SPAC17G8.09	SPAC9.02c	shg1	SPAC9.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.129530718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785018	3361506	2542555	280582	279012	SPAC17G8.09	SPAC1952.06c	shg1	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512792556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785019	3361506	2540595	280582	277121	SPAC17G8.09	SPBC21C3.02c	shg1	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.194759042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785020	3361506	2540263	280582	276794	SPAC17G8.09	SPBC32H8.02c	shg1	nep2	-	mug120|pi021|SPACTOKYO_453.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864341933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785021	3361506	2542568	280582	279024	SPAC17G8.09	SPAC1952.02	shg1	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381627397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785022	3361506	2541741	280582	278235	SPAC17G8.09	SPAC20G4.02c	shg1	fus1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.763416221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785023	3361506	2540797	280582	277316	SPAC17G8.09	SPBC18H10.11c	shg1	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.255532839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785024	3361506	2542513	280582	278971	SPAC17G8.09	SPAC1952.05	shg1	gcn5	-	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.051240525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785025	3361506	2542464	280582	278925	SPAC17G8.09	SPAC1A6.09c	shg1	lag1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.063949927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785026	3361506	2540371	280582	276900	SPAC17G8.09	SPBC36.11	shg1	SPBC36.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048625506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785027	3361506	2539815	280582	276365	SPAC17G8.09	SPBC1105.02c	shg1	lys4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988974905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785028	3361506	2542519	280582	278977	SPAC17G8.09	SPAC19G12.08	shg1	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.916109357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785029	3361506	5802861	280582	857999	SPAC17G8.09	SPAC1D4.01	shg1	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818578529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785030	3361506	2540967	280582	277483	SPAC17G8.09	SPBC36B7.08c	shg1	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32068366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785031	3361506	2542597	280582	279051	SPAC17G8.09	SPAP8A3.07c	shg1	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504114601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785032	3361506	2541186	280582	277700	SPAC17G8.09	SPBC725.01	shg1	SPBC725.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.646467781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785033	3361506	2540533	280582	277061	SPAC17G8.09	SPBC29A10.16c	shg1	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.267414417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785034	3361506	2540936	280582	277452	SPAC17G8.09	SPBC800.05c	shg1	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039190655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785035	3361506	2539928	280582	276472	SPAC17G8.09	SPBC1604.08c	shg1	imp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.947117013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785036	3361506	2539178	280582	275749	SPAC17G8.09	SPCC1682.14	shg1	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.568272792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785037	3361506	2542423	280582	278885	SPAC17G8.09	SPAC17G6.08	shg1	pep7	-	vac1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505977241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785038	3361506	2539253	280582	275823	SPAC17G8.09	SPCC1827.03c	shg1	SPCC1827.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988134451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785039	3361506	2541238	280582	277752	SPAC17G8.09	SPBC8E4.05c	shg1	SPBC8E4.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.506258461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785040	3361506	2543384	280582	279806	SPAC17G8.09	SPAC637.06	shg1	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.909424317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785041	2543413	2542177	279835	278652	SPAC4F8.12c	SPAC17H9.08	spp42	SPAC17H9.08	cwf6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.84541474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785042	2543413	2539898	279835	276444	SPAC4F8.12c	SPBC12D12.07c	spp42	trx2	cwf6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.513116338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785043	2541801	2542207	278292	278682	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC17H9.10c	snf5	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.414814385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785044	2541801	2539050	278292	275623	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC11E10.08	snf5	rik1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.325420487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785045	2541801	2539147	278292	275719	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC622.12c	snf5	gdh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.459089412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785046	2541801	2538721	278292	275305	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC1494.10	snf5	adn3	-	SPCC70.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.948538262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785047	2541801	2539841	278292	276389	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC17D1.05	snf5	SPBC17D1.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.30223908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785048	2541801	2540060	278292	276598	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC106.01	snf5	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.017679226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785049	2541801	3361210	278292	280286	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC16E9.16c	snf5	lsd90	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.135566031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785050	2541801	2538961	278292	275535	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC285.14	snf5	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.166160485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785051	2541801	2539549	278292	276110	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC576.01c	snf5	xan1	-	SPCC576.01c|SPCPB1C11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.677298023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785052	2541801	2540105	278292	276642	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC106.04	snf5	ada1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.517553589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785053	2541801	2542598	278292	279052	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC6G10.08	snf5	idp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.045744331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785054	2541801	2542723	278292	279174	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC25H1.03	snf5	atg101	-	mug66	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.33276093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785055	2541801	2540833	278292	277351	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC18H10.20c	snf5	any1	-	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.341992323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785056	2541801	2541343	278292	277854	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBPB2B2.19c	snf5	SPBPB2B2.19c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.746450737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785057	2541801	2540913	278292	277429	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC56F2.08c	snf5	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386102578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785058	2541801	2539452	278292	276015	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC70.03c	snf5	SPCC70.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.883703185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785059	2541801	2540026	278292	276570	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC16D10.08c	snf5	hsp104	-	SPBC16D10.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.298459879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785060	2541801	2538977	278292	275551	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC1020.06c	snf5	tal1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.678834349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785061	2541801	2543064	278292	279497	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC3G6.01	snf5	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580694716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785062	2541801	2540131	278292	276668	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC1778.05c	snf5	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.501793809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785063	2541801	2540524	278292	277052	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC21B10.08c	snf5	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.917999445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785064	2541801	2542293	278292	278761	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC17G8.14c	snf5	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.038533229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785065	2541801	2540995	278292	277511	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC337.16	snf5	cho1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.595068339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785066	2541801	2540528	278292	277056	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC18H10.04c	snf5	sce3	-	tif48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.889673889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785067	2541801	2539035	278292	275608	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC794.09c	snf5	tef101	-	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.033079543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785068	2541801	2539930	278292	276474	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC1198.11c	snf5	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.389134121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785069	2541801	2539202	278292	275773	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC162.10	snf5	ppk33	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.276489057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785070	2541801	2541130	278292	277645	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC776.11	snf5	rpl2801	-	rpl28-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.745609897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785071	2541801	2539939	278292	276483	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC11G11.01	snf5	fis1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.72950491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785072	2541801	2541104	278292	277619	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC6B1.03c	snf5	SPBC6B1.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.301460189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785073	2541801	2540296	278292	276827	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC2D10.05	snf5	exg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.510861484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785074	2541801	2541117	278292	277632	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC646.13	snf5	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.223515867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785075	2541801	2541345	278292	277856	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBP35G2.07	snf5	ilv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.954586574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785076	2541801	2543434	278292	279854	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC8F11.02c	snf5	dph3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.658939444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785077	2541801	2543680	278292	280094	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC4G9.20c	snf5	SPAC4G9.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.473738492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785078	2541801	2542103	278292	278579	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC31G5.11	snf5	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.739387437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785079	2541801	2542345	278292	278811	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC1705.02	snf5	SPAC1705.02	-	SPAC1F2.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.558333879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785080	2541801	2539208	278292	275778	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC1450.11c	snf5	cek1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.963086416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785081	2541801	2539332	278292	275898	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCPB1C11.01	snf5	amt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.378886172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785082	2541801	2540975	278292	277491	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC354.12	snf5	gpd3	-	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.347326589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785083	2541801	2539420	278292	275985	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC970.07c	snf5	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.002351938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785084	2541801	2541200	278292	277714	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC8D2.03c	snf5	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.338285967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785085	2541801	2540979	278292	277495	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC3H7.10	snf5	elp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439274271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785086	2541801	2542273	278292	278742	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC17H9.13c	snf5	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.858994739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785087	2541801	2539913	278292	276457	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC11G11.03	snf5	mrt4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.345397175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785088	2541801	2539463	278292	276026	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC550.11	snf5	SPCC550.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.702149828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785089	2541801	2540029	278292	276573	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC16A3.01	snf5	spn3	-	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.535497278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785090	2541801	2542696	278292	279149	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC29B12.03	snf5	spd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.458265726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785091	2541801	2542689	278292	279142	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC29B12.04	snf5	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.255502407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785092	2541801	2542724	278292	279175	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC767.01c	snf5	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.37362334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785093	2541801	2540945	278292	277461	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC342.06c	snf5	rtt109	-	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.555948097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785094	2541801	2539576	278292	276136	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC794.01c	snf5	zwf2	-	SPCC794.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319286548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785095	2541801	2543453	278292	279873	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC3G9.03	snf5	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.333900559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785096	2541801	2541026	278292	277541	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC337.09	snf5	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.700767583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785097	2541801	2539575	278292	276135	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCP20C8.02c	snf5	SPCP20C8.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.422639719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785098	2541801	2540160	278292	276695	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC1773.17c	snf5	SPBC1773.17c	-	SPBP26C9.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702290966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785099	2541801	2542012	278292	278495	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC23C11.02c	snf5	rps23	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.782277735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785100	2541801	2540463	278292	276991	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC2F12.15c	snf5	pfa3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.000497314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785101	2541801	2542022	278292	278505	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC23A1.03	snf5	apt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.813039883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785102	2541801	2539441	278292	276004	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCPJ732.02c	snf5	xks1	-	SPCPJ732.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.131613003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785103	2541801	2539823	278292	276373	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC16A3.18	snf5	cip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.466107697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785104	2541801	2541428	278292	277933	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC14C4.11	snf5	SPAC14C4.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.434293558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785105	2541801	2543296	278292	279721	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC9E9.03	snf5	leu2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.120334646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785106	2541801	2539648	278292	276203	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC1198.08	snf5	SPBC1198.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.177056115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785107	2541801	2538698	278292	275283	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC1442.02	snf5	SPCC1442.02	-	SPCC1450.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.506660794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785108	2541801	2542082	278292	278559	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC29B12.10c	snf5	pgt1	-	opt1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.914427002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785109	2541801	2543584	278292	279999	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAPB1E7.11c	snf5	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.415783221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785110	2541801	2541416	278292	277923	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBCPT2R1.01c	snf5	SPBCPT2R1.01c	-	SPBPB2B2.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.464108522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785111	2541801	2539381	278292	275947	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC1739.10	snf5	mug33	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.467812281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785112	2541801	2542253	278292	278723	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC17H9.04c	snf5	SPAC17H9.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.360014664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785113	2541801	2542213	278292	278687	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC3G6.13c	snf5	rpl4101	-	rpl41-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.555384384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785114	2541801	3361543	278292	280619	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC9.13c	snf5	cwf16	-	SPAPJ735.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.52516007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785115	2541801	2540964	278292	277480	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC365.16	snf5	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.351310743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785116	2541801	2541384	278292	277895	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBP8B7.26	snf5	SPBP8B7.26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.876375555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785117	2541801	2542036	278292	278518	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC23A1.19c	snf5	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.797222772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785118	2541801	2542311	278292	278777	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC16A10.05c	snf5	dad1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.95274915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785119	2541801	2539051	278292	275624	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC1183.11	snf5	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.029601042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785120	2541801	2539705	278292	276258	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC1105.10	snf5	rav1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.72093117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785121	2541801	2540892	278292	277408	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC530.01	snf5	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.76745125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785122	2541801	2540903	278292	277419	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC530.05	snf5	prt1	-	SPBC530.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.606143789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785123	2541801	2541776	278292	278270	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC23H3.05c	snf5	swd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.412924964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785124	2541801	2540241	278292	276773	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC32H8.11	snf5	mei4	-	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.593826683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785125	2541801	2543144	278292	279576	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC3F10.05c	snf5	mug113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.828464178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785126	2541801	2543385	278292	279807	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC4G9.12	snf5	SPAC4G9.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.315595874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785127	2541801	2538770	278292	275353	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC1753.02c	snf5	git3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.686712192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785128	2541801	2539628	278292	276185	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC1604.03c	snf5	SPBC1604.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.732287158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785129	2541801	2540647	278292	277172	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC18H10.07	snf5	SPBC18H10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.585410913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785130	2541801	2541160	278292	277675	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC725.09c	snf5	hob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.140112213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785131	2541801	2540673	278292	277198	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC1D7.03	snf5	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.762424388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785132	2541801	2542168	278292	278643	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC17A5.16	snf5	ftp105	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.88254299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785133	2541801	2542921	278292	279362	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC1093.01	snf5	ppr5	-	SPAC12B10.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.956200064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785134	2541801	2542469	278292	278930	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC19A8.04	snf5	erg5	-	cyp61	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.63919753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785135	2541801	2543358	278292	279780	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC688.10	snf5	rev3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.046125282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785136	2541801	2540086	278292	276624	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC16H5.12c	snf5	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.111473614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785137	2541801	2543250	278292	279678	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC3G9.15c	snf5	fcf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.047634225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785138	2541801	2541710	278292	278205	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC343.11c	snf5	msc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.259139028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785139	2541801	2539284	278292	275852	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC584.15c	snf5	SPCC584.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.674324442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785140	2541801	2540326	278292	276856	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC2G5.06c	snf5	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0702809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785141	2541801	2538769	278292	275352	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC126.04c	snf5	sgf73	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.069150806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785142	2541801	2542861	278292	279307	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC13G7.13c	snf5	msa1	-	SPAC6C3.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.00706896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785143	2541801	3361269	278292	280345	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC31A8.01c	snf5	rtn1	-	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.33557457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785144	2541801	2542032	278292	278514	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC23C11.04c	snf5	pnk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.612788109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785145	2541801	2540665	278292	277190	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC83.02c	snf5	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.542652707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785146	2541801	2542014	278292	278497	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC20H4.04	snf5	fml2	-	mfh2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.889552485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785147	2541801	2540997	278292	277513	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC3H7.06c	snf5	pof9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.474642643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785148	2541801	2538873	278292	275452	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC306.11	snf5	SPCC306.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.722288627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785149	2541801	2538945	278292	275519	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC1739.06c	snf5	SPCC1739.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.693452974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785150	2541801	2538837	278292	275418	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC4B3.03c	snf5	SPCC4B3.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.936432619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785151	2541801	2541720	278292	278214	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC23H3.13c	snf5	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.008691137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785152	2541801	2543495	278292	279914	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC513.03	snf5	mfm2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.693050954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785153	2541801	2540836	278292	277354	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC18H10.19	snf5	vps38	-	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.600040385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785154	2541801	2541248	278292	277762	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC8D2.10c	snf5	rmt3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.126818917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785155	2541801	2540232	278292	276764	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC336.10c	snf5	tif512	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.773911019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785156	2541801	2541241	278292	277755	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC887.17	snf5	SPBC887.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.700292371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785157	2541801	2538935	278292	275511	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC1682.11c	snf5	ctl1	-	SPCC1682.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.540663395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785158	2541801	2539027	278292	275600	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC1322.08	snf5	srk1	-	mkp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.99691394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785159	2541801	2540335	278292	276865	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC30B4.03c	snf5	adn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.318867975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785160	2541801	2539715	278292	276268	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC1778.09	snf5	SPBC1778.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.818626846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785161	2541801	2540387	278292	276915	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC24C6.04	snf5	SPBC24C6.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.375676807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785162	2541801	2540990	278292	277506	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC36B7.06c	snf5	mug20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.267803785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785163	2541801	2541389	278292	277900	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBPB2B2.09c	snf5	SPBPB2B2.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.96691113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785164	2541801	2543561	278292	279977	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC922.04	snf5	SPAC922.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.855523609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785165	2541801	2541142	278292	277657	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC725.04	snf5	SPBC725.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.559036739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785166	2541801	2542597	278292	279051	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAP8A3.07c	snf5	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.944041285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785167	2541801	2539847	278292	276395	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC530.14c	snf5	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.948653178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785168	2541801	2543517	278292	279935	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC3G9.05	snf5	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578420199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785169	2541801	2541296	278292	277808	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBP8B7.06	snf5	rpp201	-	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.964694865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785170	2541801	2539427	278292	275992	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC663.15c	snf5	SPCC663.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.581489498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785171	2541801	2541186	278292	277700	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC725.01	snf5	SPBC725.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.141975928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785172	2541801	2539066	278292	275638	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC126.13c	snf5	SPCC126.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.326887341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785173	2541801	2541746	278292	278240	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC20G4.04c	snf5	hus1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.82912514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785174	2541801	2540193	278292	276726	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC1289.10c	snf5	adn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.561826569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785175	2541801	2540930	278292	277446	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC354.10	snf5	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.561718448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785176	2541801	2538848	278292	275429	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC613.12c	snf5	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.287377453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785177	2541801	2540946	278292	277462	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC36.04	snf5	cys11	-	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.930076545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785178	2541801	2540643	278292	277168	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC19G7.06	snf5	mbx1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.482237066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785179	2541801	2542869	278292	279314	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC140.02	snf5	gar2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.310516028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785180	2541801	2542875	278292	279320	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC13G7.02c	snf5	ssa1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.875648953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785181	2541801	2541713	278292	278208	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC3A12.12	snf5	atp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.74396322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785182	2541801	2540001	278292	276545	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC1289.13c	snf5	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.789545412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785183	2541801	2540910	278292	277426	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC577.02	snf5	rpl3801	-	rpl38-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.833186891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785184	2541801	2542283	278292	278751	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC27F1.08	snf5	pdt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.006678737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785185	2541801	2543113	278292	279545	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC3F10.07c	snf5	erf4	-	mug91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.983348783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785186	2541801	2539160	278292	275732	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC18.17c	snf5	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389926976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785187	2541801	2541156	278292	277671	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC685.07c	snf5	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.231537134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785188	2541801	2538762	278292	275345	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC306.04c	snf5	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.305817436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785189	2541801	2540619	278292	277145	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC25H2.15	snf5	SPBC25H2.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.874826281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785190	2541801	2539137	278292	275709	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC1682.08c	snf5	mcp2	-	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.576583898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785191	2541801	2543670	278292	280084	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAPB1E7.06c	snf5	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.878845429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785192	2541801	2542881	278292	279326	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC13F5.03c	snf5	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.39596648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785193	2541801	2539925	278292	276469	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC16H5.13	snf5	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.211163479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785194	2541801	2542515	278292	278973	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC1952.09c	snf5	SPAC1952.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.42111088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785195	2541801	2540648	278292	277173	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC1921.05	snf5	ape2	-	ape1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.488511224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785196	2541801	2540800	278292	277319	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC409.20c	snf5	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.043743494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785197	2541801	2543304	278292	279728	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC6B12.12	snf5	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.045804104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785198	2541801	2538717	278292	275301	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC1235.02	snf5	bio2	-	SPCC320.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.09277143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785199	2541801	2540998	278292	277514	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC3D6.05	snf5	ptp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.485681025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785200	2541801	2543066	278292	279499	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC343.12	snf5	rds1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.23376903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785201	2541801	2539239	278292	275809	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC1020.10	snf5	oca2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.694897126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785202	2541801	2541425	278292	277930	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC2C4.17c	snf5	msy2	-	SPAC2C4.17c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.682007751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785203	2541801	2539816	278292	276366	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC12C2.04	snf5	SPBC12C2.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.036115571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785204	2541801	2541531	278292	278031	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC25A8.01c	snf5	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.471488269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785205	2541801	2539013	278292	275586	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC364.03	snf5	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.662607409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785206	2541801	2541470	278292	277972	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAPYUG7.04c	snf5	rpb9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.642419069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785207	2541801	2542042	278292	278523	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC23A1.14c	snf5	SPAC23A1.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.066036884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785208	2541801	2540677	278292	277202	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC21B10.03c	snf5	ath1	-	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.851031374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785209	2541801	2540211	278292	276744	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC947.15c	snf5	nde1	-	SPBC947.15c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.102457477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785210	2541801	2541404	278292	277913	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBPB2B2.18	snf5	SPBPB2B2.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.003000357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785211	2541801	2541380	278292	277891	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBPB2B2.13	snf5	gal1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.126404559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785212	2541801	2540516	278292	277044	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC21C3.01c	snf5	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.402910478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785213	2541801	2540182	278292	276715	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC16G5.06	snf5	SPBC16G5.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.463061005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785214	2541801	2543672	278292	280086	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC4H3.01	snf5	SPAC4H3.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701494358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785215	2541801	2540555	278292	277082	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBP16F5.02	snf5	mcs2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.171494557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785216	2541801	2540936	278292	277452	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC800.05c	snf5	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924600089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785217	2541801	2540422	278292	276950	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC27.08c	snf5	sua1	-	SPBC28F2.01c|asp1|met3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389180155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785218	2541801	2542904	278292	279348	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC144.11	snf5	rps1102	-	rps11|rps11-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.970369667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785219	2541801	2543525	278292	279943	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC4A8.14	snf5	SPAC4A8.14	-	prs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.052448991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785220	2541801	2543380	278292	279802	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC4G9.16c	snf5	rpl901	-	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.909643076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785221	2541801	2538840	278292	275421	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC736.07c	snf5	SPCC736.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.114437151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785222	2541801	2539189	278292	275760	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC1682.16	snf5	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.287353633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785223	2541801	2539253	278292	275823	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC1827.03c	snf5	SPCC1827.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.692319368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785224	2541801	2539169	278292	275740	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC1235.11	snf5	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.161519646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785225	2541801	2541238	278292	277752	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC8E4.05c	snf5	SPBC8E4.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.912470159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785226	2541801	2541774	278292	278268	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC22E12.05c	snf5	rer1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.659591545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785227	2541801	2542886	278292	279331	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC1486.01	snf5	SPAC1486.01	-	sod2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.42838816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785228	2541801	3361517	278292	280593	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAP11E10.02c	snf5	mam3	-	SPAPB1A10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.871473292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785229	2541801	2542700	278292	279153	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC26H5.08c	snf5	bgl2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.736699834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785230	2541801	2543333	278292	279756	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC694.02	snf5	SPAC694.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.404208694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785231	2541801	2543090	278292	279523	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC1348.01	snf5	SPBC1348.01	-	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.082020779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785232	2541801	2543624	278292	280038	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC4D7.06c	snf5	SPAC4D7.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449757366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785233	2541801	2542943	278292	279384	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC1348.03	snf5	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.572548873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785234	2541801	2542561	278292	279017	SPAC2F7.08c	SPAC31G5.17c	snf5	rps1001	-	rps10-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700290912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785235	2541801	2541576	278292	278073	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC1348.02	snf5	SPBC1348.02	-	SPAC1348.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.17165845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785236	2541801	2540208	278292	276741	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC9B6.03	snf5	SPBC9B6.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.252894925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785237	2541801	2541062	278292	277577	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC660.11	snf5	tcg1	-	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.344235822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785238	2541801	2540320	278292	276850	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC3D6.04c	snf5	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.099931124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785239	2541801	2540734	278292	277257	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC19G7.09	snf5	ulp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.617621859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785240	2541801	2539001	278292	275575	SPAC2F7.08c	SPCC1494.08c	snf5	SPCC1494.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.969655496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785241	2541801	2540649	278292	277174	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC19F8.08	snf5	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.767715586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785242	2538704	2541866	275288	278356	SPCC320.07c	SPAC23H3.11c	mde7	SPAC23H3.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816829721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785243	2538704	2538769	275288	275352	SPCC320.07c	SPCC126.04c	mde7	sgf73	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.951206745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785244	2538704	2538692	275288	275277	SPCC320.07c	SPCC162.04c	mde7	wtf13	-	wtf12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.603998561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785245	2538704	2542635	275288	279089	SPCC320.07c	SPAC24H6.09	mde7	gef1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.337023438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785246	2541315	2542895	277827	279339	SPBP22H7.06	SPAC13G6.10c	SPBP22H7.06	asl1	pi025|SPACTOKYO_453.09c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980482153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785247	2541315	2541902	277827	278392	SPBP22H7.06	SPAC27E2.07	SPBP22H7.06	pvg2	pi025|SPACTOKYO_453.09c	mug53	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326387806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785248	2541315	2540913	277827	277429	SPBP22H7.06	SPBC56F2.08c	SPBP22H7.06	SPBC56F2.08c	pi025|SPACTOKYO_453.09c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327776983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785249	2541315	2540894	277827	277410	SPBP22H7.06	SPBC530.04	SPBP22H7.06	mod5	pi025|SPACTOKYO_453.09c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516876801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785250	2541315	2542168	277827	278643	SPBP22H7.06	SPAC17A5.16	SPBP22H7.06	ftp105	pi025|SPACTOKYO_453.09c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.846682567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785251	2541315	2540086	277827	276624	SPBP22H7.06	SPBC16H5.12c	SPBP22H7.06	SPBC16H5.12c	pi025|SPACTOKYO_453.09c	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.326919913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785252	2541315	2540229	277827	276761	SPBP22H7.06	SPBC31F10.15c	SPBP22H7.06	atp15	pi025|SPACTOKYO_453.09c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.663333865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785253	2541315	2541488	277827	277990	SPBP22H7.06	SPAC227.17c	SPBP22H7.06	SPAC227.17c	pi025|SPACTOKYO_453.09c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.86836362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785254	2541315	2543304	277827	279728	SPBP22H7.06	SPAC6B12.12	SPBP22H7.06	tom70	pi025|SPACTOKYO_453.09c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876384281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785255	2541315	2542955	277827	279395	SPBP22H7.06	SPAC11E3.12	SPBP22H7.06	SPAC11E3.12	pi025|SPACTOKYO_453.09c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578056787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785256	2541315	2541229	277827	277743	SPBP22H7.06	SPBC839.05c	SPBP22H7.06	rps1701	pi025|SPACTOKYO_453.09c	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643802367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785257	2541315	2541757	277827	278251	SPBP22H7.06	SPAC2F7.10	SPBP22H7.06	akr1	pi025|SPACTOKYO_453.09c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04622287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785258	2541315	2543056	277827	279490	SPBP22H7.06	SPAC3A11.04	SPBP22H7.06	SPAC3A11.04	pi025|SPACTOKYO_453.09c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639620906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785259	2539807	2540863	276357	277380	SPBC1778.10c	SPBC56F2.03	ppk21	SPBC56F2.03	SPBC4C3.11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442756598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785260	2539807	2542443	276357	278905	SPBC1778.10c	SPAC17G6.13	ppk21	slt1	SPBC4C3.11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.129259526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785261	2539807	2542747	276357	279197	SPBC1778.10c	SPAC15A10.06	ppk21	SPAC15A10.06	SPBC4C3.11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.441587941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785262	2539807	2541771	276357	278265	SPBC1778.10c	SPAC23H3.06	ppk21	apl6	SPBC4C3.11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.149954852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785263	2539807	2541285	276357	277798	SPBC1778.10c	SPBC9B6.09c	ppk21	mdl1	SPBC4C3.11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507804635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785264	2539807	2539937	276357	276481	SPBC1778.10c	SPBC1539.08	ppk21	arf6	SPBC4C3.11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.968796966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785265	2539807	2543029	276357	279465	SPBC1778.10c	SPAC11G7.01	ppk21	SPAC11G7.01	SPBC4C3.11	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.865704961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785266	2539807	2541538	276357	278038	SPBC1778.10c	SPAC24B11.08c	ppk21	SPAC24B11.08c	SPBC4C3.11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.569822118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785267	2539807	2541424	276357	277929	SPBC1778.10c	SPAC23G3.04	ppk21	ies4	SPBC4C3.11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.0750025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785268	2539807	2542318	276357	278784	SPBC1778.10c	SPAC16C9.05	ppk21	cph1	SPBC4C3.11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.623029047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785269	2539807	2540059	276357	276597	SPBC1778.10c	SPBC1198.01	ppk21	fmd2	SPBC4C3.11	SPBC1198.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.66445633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785270	2539807	2542260	276357	278729	SPBC1778.10c	SPAC1F12.05	ppk21	SPAC1F12.05	SPBC4C3.11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.05539168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785271	2539807	2541741	276357	278235	SPBC1778.10c	SPAC20G4.02c	ppk21	fus1	SPBC4C3.11	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.816456293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785272	2539807	2541249	276357	277763	SPBC1778.10c	SPBC947.01	ppk21	alf1	SPBC4C3.11	SPBC947.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.97090109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785273	2539807	2539990	276357	276534	SPBC1778.10c	SPBC1289.14	ppk21	SPBC1289.14	SPBC4C3.11	SPBC8E4.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713958665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785274	2539807	2540396	276357	276924	SPBC1778.10c	SPBC31F10.12	ppk21	tma20	SPBC4C3.11	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.768084084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785275	2539807	2539603	276357	276161	SPBC1778.10c	SPBC1289.06c	ppk21	ppr8	SPBC4C3.11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.068570506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785276	2539807	2539689	276357	276244	SPBC1778.10c	SPBC1861.03	ppk21	mak10	SPBC4C3.11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.972942843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785277	2539807	2541899	276357	278389	SPBC1778.10c	SPAC22E12.11c	ppk21	set3	SPBC4C3.11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444461841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785278	2539807	2541704	276357	278199	SPBC1778.10c	SPAC1250.04c	ppk21	atl1	SPBC4C3.11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580965651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785279	2539807	2539667	276357	276222	SPBC1778.10c	SPBC13G1.08c	ppk21	ash2	SPBC4C3.11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.264127636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785280	2539807	3361569	276357	280645	SPBC1778.10c	SPAC186.04c	ppk21	SPAC186.04c	SPBC4C3.11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.236920122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785281	2539807	2542813	276357	279260	SPBC1778.10c	SPAC29B12.11c	ppk21	SPAC29B12.11c	SPBC4C3.11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.676090655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785282	2539807	2541053	276357	277568	SPBC1778.10c	SPBC56F2.10c	ppk21	alg5	SPBC4C3.11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63246458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785283	2539807	2542597	276357	279051	SPBC1778.10c	SPAP8A3.07c	ppk21	SPAP8A3.07c	SPBC4C3.11	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928342052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785284	2539807	2541614	276357	278111	SPBC1778.10c	SPAC29A4.20	ppk21	elp3	SPBC4C3.11	kat9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.508508209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785285	2539807	2540005	276357	276549	SPBC1778.10c	SPBC1347.09	ppk21	SPBC1347.09	SPBC4C3.11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.260456648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785286	2539807	2541337	276357	277848	SPBC1778.10c	SPBP35G2.13c	ppk21	swc2	SPBC4C3.11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.063744866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785287	2539807	2540930	276357	277446	SPBC1778.10c	SPBC354.10	ppk21	def1	SPBC4C3.11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.137225099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785288	2539807	2542973	276357	279412	SPBC1778.10c	SPAC10F6.04	ppk21	SPAC10F6.04	SPBC4C3.11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.504363217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785289	2539807	2542748	276357	279198	SPBC1778.10c	SPAC15A10.09c	ppk21	pun1	SPBC4C3.11	SPAC15A10.09c|sur7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.894627596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785290	2539807	2540910	276357	277426	SPBC1778.10c	SPBC577.02	ppk21	rpl3801	SPBC4C3.11	rpl38-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714639328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785291	2539807	2541786	276357	278278	SPBC1778.10c	SPAC22F3.08c	ppk21	rok1	SPBC4C3.11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.679040033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785292	2539807	2543663	276357	280077	SPBC1778.10c	SPAC644.07	ppk21	SPAC644.07	SPBC4C3.11	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095016133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785293	2539807	2543051	276357	279486	SPBC1778.10c	SPAC1071.08	ppk21	rpp203	SPBC4C3.11	rla6|rpp2-3|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.840290174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785294	2539807	2543106	276357	279538	SPBC1778.10c	SPAC3A11.13	ppk21	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC4C3.11	SPAC3H5.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.8152396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785295	2539807	2543304	276357	279728	SPBC1778.10c	SPAC6B12.12	ppk21	tom70	SPBC4C3.11	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.857344297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785296	2539807	2541432	276357	277937	SPBC1778.10c	SPAC1F5.05c	ppk21	mso1	SPBC4C3.11	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.54629298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785297	2539807	2540829	276357	277347	SPBC1778.10c	SPBC800.09	ppk21	sum2	SPBC4C3.11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38565834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785298	2539807	2542418	276357	278881	SPBC1778.10c	SPAC1805.07c	ppk21	dad2	SPBC4C3.11	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852629191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785299	2539807	2541817	276357	278308	SPBC1778.10c	SPAC23H4.09	ppk21	cdb4	SPBC4C3.11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.753313294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785300	2539807	2540936	276357	277452	SPBC1778.10c	SPBC800.05c	ppk21	atb2	SPBC4C3.11	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.990022433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785301	2539807	2543516	276357	279934	SPBC1778.10c	SPAC4F10.11	ppk21	spn1	SPBC4C3.11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640156537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785302	2539807	2543387	276357	279809	SPBC1778.10c	SPAPB1E7.02c	ppk21	mcl1	SPBC4C3.11	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642143137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785303	2539807	2542424	276357	278886	SPBC1778.10c	SPAC1805.14	ppk21	SPAC1805.14	SPBC4C3.11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979248484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785304	2539807	2540787	276357	277306	SPBC1778.10c	SPBC1921.07c	ppk21	sgf29	SPBC4C3.11	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635398195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785305	2539807	2539033	276357	275606	SPBC1778.10c	SPCC1450.07c	ppk21	dao1	SPBC4C3.11	SPCC1450.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330982069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785306	2538931	2538706	275507	275290	SPCC1620.10	SPCC338.08	cwf26	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.556994277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785307	2538931	3361520	275507	280596	SPCC1620.10	SPAC1610.02c	cwf26	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.830701702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785308	2538931	2543628	275507	280042	SPCC1620.10	SPAC3H8.10	cwf26	spo20	-	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.626681976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785309	2539109	2538939	275681	275514	SPCC74.03c	SPCC1672.04c	ssp2	SPCC1672.04c	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.026005661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785310	2539109	2541902	275681	278392	SPCC74.03c	SPAC27E2.07	ssp2	pvg2	ucp9	mug53	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.345039936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785311	2539109	2542862	275681	279308	SPCC74.03c	SPAC140.03	ssp2	arb1	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.194932653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785312	2539109	3361210	275681	280286	SPCC74.03c	SPBC16E9.16c	ssp2	lsd90	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.378659253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785313	2539109	2542577	275681	279033	SPCC74.03c	SPAC19G12.15c	ssp2	tpp1	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.698855363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785314	2539109	2542518	275681	278976	SPCC74.03c	SPAC1B3.16c	ssp2	vht1	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.980374223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785315	2539109	2541512	275681	278013	SPCC74.03c	SPAC11E3.08c	ssp2	nse6	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.228199501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785316	2539109	2540235	275681	276767	SPCC74.03c	SPBC336.13c	ssp2	SPBC336.13c	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.648600095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785317	2539109	2543152	275681	279584	SPCC74.03c	SPAC869.03c	ssp2	SPAC869.03c	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.767384937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785318	2539109	2542066	275681	278543	SPCC74.03c	SPAC227.05	ssp2	SPAC227.05	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.336209973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785319	2539109	2542671	275681	279124	SPCC74.03c	SPAC824.09c	ssp2	SPAC824.09c	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44406302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785320	2539109	2540131	275681	276668	SPCC74.03c	SPBC1778.05c	ssp2	SPBC1778.05c	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.974946406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785321	2539109	2542197	275681	278672	SPCC74.03c	SPAC1142.01	ssp2	rqc1	ucp9	SPAC1142.01|SPAC17G6.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776574321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785322	2539109	2541552	275681	278051	SPCC74.03c	SPAC1142.08	ssp2	fhl1	ucp9	SPAC8C9.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381292123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785323	2539109	2540528	275681	277056	SPCC74.03c	SPBC18H10.04c	ssp2	sce3	ucp9	tif48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.191004586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785324	2539109	2541438	275681	277943	SPCC74.03c	SPAC23G3.10c	ssp2	ssr3	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.51738514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785325	2539109	2541117	275681	277632	SPCC74.03c	SPBC646.13	ssp2	sds23	ucp9	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.026566047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785326	2539109	2542747	275681	279197	SPCC74.03c	SPAC15A10.06	ssp2	SPAC15A10.06	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.849608043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785327	2539109	2539196	275681	275767	SPCC74.03c	SPCC1795.03	ssp2	gms1	ucp9	gmn3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098359769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785328	2539109	2541681	275681	278177	SPCC74.03c	SPAC14C4.01c	ssp2	SPAC14C4.01c	ucp9	SPAC19D5.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506997776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785329	2539109	2541633	275681	278129	SPCC74.03c	SPAC664.01c	ssp2	swi6	ucp9	SPAC824.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.669225778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785330	2539109	2540686	275681	277211	SPCC74.03c	SPBC21D10.10	ssp2	bdc1	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387469397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785331	2539109	2541771	275681	278265	SPCC74.03c	SPAC23H3.06	ssp2	apl6	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.500729458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785332	2539109	2538922	275681	275499	SPCC74.03c	SPCC16C4.10	ssp2	SPCC16C4.10	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.113945652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785333	2539109	2542986	275681	279424	SPCC74.03c	SPAC11D3.14c	ssp2	SPAC11D3.14c	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445531631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785334	2539109	2542345	275681	278811	SPCC74.03c	SPAC1705.02	ssp2	SPAC1705.02	ucp9	SPAC1F2.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982193473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785335	2539109	2540491	275681	277019	SPCC74.03c	SPBC28E12.04	ssp2	SPBC28E12.04	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.011779702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785336	2539109	2540455	275681	276983	SPCC74.03c	SPBC215.05	ssp2	gpd1	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.231387528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785337	2539109	2540664	275681	277189	SPCC74.03c	SPBC215.02	ssp2	bob1	ucp9	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094134972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785338	2539109	2539226	275681	275796	SPCC74.03c	SPCC16C4.20c	ssp2	SPCC16C4.20c	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.766296906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785339	2539109	2542107	275681	278583	SPCC74.03c	SPAC30.01c	ssp2	sec72	ucp9	sec7b|sec702	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.493222033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785340	2539109	2542677	275681	279130	SPCC74.03c	SPAC26F1.10c	ssp2	pyp1	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63554903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785341	2539109	2539443	275681	276006	SPCC74.03c	SPCC736.02	ssp2	SPCC736.02	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195415237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785342	2539109	2541682	275681	278178	SPCC74.03c	SPAC15F9.02	ssp2	seh1	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.93268147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785343	2539109	2539235	275681	275805	SPCC74.03c	SPCC1682.15	ssp2	mug122	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808788137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785344	2539109	2539472	275681	276035	SPCC74.03c	SPCC794.03	ssp2	SPCC794.03	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.334645576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785345	2539109	2543159	275681	279590	SPCC74.03c	SPAC3C7.09	ssp2	set8	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.330163437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785346	2539109	2539935	275681	276479	SPCC74.03c	SPBC13G1.04c	ssp2	abh1	ucp9	SPBC13G1.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808642196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785347	2539109	2539434	275681	275997	SPCC74.03c	SPCC757.09c	ssp2	rnc1	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.35566382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785348	2539109	2543453	275681	279873	SPCC74.03c	SPAC3G9.03	ssp2	rpl2301	ucp9	rpl23-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.921683826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785349	2539109	2541503	275681	278005	SPCC74.03c	SPAC22A12.01c	ssp2	pso2	ucp9	SPAC56F8.17c|snm1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194214637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785350	2539109	2541026	275681	277541	SPCC74.03c	SPBC337.09	ssp2	erg28	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.382797746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785351	2539109	2542335	275681	278801	SPCC74.03c	SPAC16E8.12c	ssp2	png3	ucp9	SPAC16E8.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865958241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785352	2539109	2539937	275681	276481	SPCC74.03c	SPBC1539.08	ssp2	arf6	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.538002941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785353	2539109	2540463	275681	276991	SPCC74.03c	SPBC2F12.15c	ssp2	pfa3	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321096638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785354	2539109	2540425	275681	276953	SPCC74.03c	SPBC27.06c	ssp2	mgr2	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.353342148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785355	2539109	2542135	275681	278611	SPCC74.03c	SPAC13A11.04c	ssp2	ubp8	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.774066226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785356	2539109	2542318	275681	278784	SPCC74.03c	SPAC16C9.05	ssp2	cph1	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.267569984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785357	2539109	2543685	275681	280099	SPCC74.03c	SPAC3C7.03c	ssp2	rad55	ucp9	rhp55	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.825439611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785358	2539109	2541436	275681	277941	SPCC74.03c	SPAC11H11.03c	ssp2	SPAC11H11.03c	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.465071278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785359	2539109	2539823	275681	276373	SPCC74.03c	SPBC16A3.18	ssp2	cip1	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.198212283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785360	2539109	2540364	275681	276893	SPCC74.03c	SPBC29B5.02c	ssp2	isp4	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810701123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785361	2539109	2541580	275681	278077	SPCC74.03c	SPAC1687.05	ssp2	pli1	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.669900594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785362	2539109	2540344	275681	276873	SPCC74.03c	SPBC30D10.03c	ssp2	SPBC30D10.03c	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.875922785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785363	2539109	2542141	275681	278617	SPCC74.03c	SPAC17C9.05c	ssp2	pmc3	ucp9	med27|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.065248835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785364	2539109	2541923	275681	278411	SPCC74.03c	SPAC23C4.09c	ssp2	SPAC23C4.09c	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044174562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785365	2539109	2540263	275681	276794	SPCC74.03c	SPBC32H8.02c	ssp2	nep2	ucp9	mug120|pi021|SPACTOKYO_453.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.73974732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785366	2539109	2542246	275681	278716	SPCC74.03c	SPAC17H9.12c	ssp2	SPAC17H9.12c	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387865162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785367	2539109	2543641	275681	280055	SPCC74.03c	SPAC3H5.08c	ssp2	SPAC3H5.08c	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.912783244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785368	2539109	2543563	275681	279979	SPCC74.03c	SPAC664.02c	ssp2	arp8	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.14376712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785369	2539109	2543543	275681	279960	SPCC74.03c	SPAPB24D3.06c	ssp2	SPAPB24D3.06c	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329462093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785370	2539109	2543584	275681	279999	SPCC74.03c	SPAPB1E7.11c	ssp2	SPAPB1E7.11c	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101875625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785371	2539109	2542373	275681	278837	SPCC74.03c	SPAC1805.06c	ssp2	hem2	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812279446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785372	2539109	2542558	275681	279014	SPCC74.03c	SPAC1952.07	ssp2	rad1	ucp9	rad19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.99207645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785373	2539109	2541021	275681	277536	SPCC74.03c	SPBC3B8.10c	ssp2	nem1	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.302263726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785374	2539109	2542344	275681	278810	SPCC74.03c	SPAC1751.01c	ssp2	gti1	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046432993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785375	2539109	2542665	275681	279118	SPCC74.03c	SPAC10F6.08c	ssp2	nht10	ucp9	nht1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.92081779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785376	2539109	2542331	275681	278797	SPCC74.03c	SPAC1834.05	ssp2	alg9	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.125645448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785377	2539109	2539960	275681	276504	SPCC74.03c	SPBC15D4.15	ssp2	pho2	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323018937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785378	2539109	2543537	275681	279954	SPCC74.03c	SPAC4D7.05	ssp2	sum1	ucp9	tif34	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.614219337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785379	2539109	2542394	275681	278858	SPCC74.03c	SPAC31G5.12c	ssp2	maf1	ucp9	n150	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040608216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785380	2539109	2542896	275681	279340	SPCC74.03c	SPAC3F10.04	ssp2	gsa1	ucp9	gsh2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.251763153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785381	2539109	2542679	275681	279132	SPCC74.03c	SPAC12B10.07	ssp2	acp1	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642782446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785382	2539109	2542950	275681	279390	SPCC74.03c	SPAC12B10.03	ssp2	bun62	ucp9	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.326460025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785383	2539109	2541741	275681	278235	SPCC74.03c	SPAC20G4.02c	ssp2	fus1	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.623443858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785384	2539109	2540797	275681	277316	SPCC74.03c	SPBC18H10.11c	ssp2	ppr2	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.053132075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785385	2539109	2541353	275681	277864	SPCC74.03c	SPBP35G2.11c	ssp2	SPBP35G2.11c	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.563265899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785386	2539109	2542499	275681	278958	SPCC74.03c	SPAC1F12.04c	ssp2	SPAC1F12.04c	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.870376759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785387	2539109	2541249	275681	277763	SPCC74.03c	SPBC947.01	ssp2	alf1	ucp9	SPBC947.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.818050049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785388	2539109	2541093	275681	277608	SPCC74.03c	SPBC646.08c	ssp2	SPBC646.08c	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.010330701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785389	2539109	2542863	275681	279309	SPCC74.03c	SPAC13G7.04c	ssp2	mac1	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450983832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785390	2539109	2543144	275681	279576	SPCC74.03c	SPAC3F10.05c	ssp2	mug113	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.570150723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785391	2539109	2542707	275681	279160	SPCC74.03c	SPAC25G10.03	ssp2	zip1	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.387671258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785392	2539109	2541545	275681	278045	SPCC74.03c	SPAC22F8.07c	ssp2	rtf1	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.921128215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785393	2539109	2540647	275681	277172	SPCC74.03c	SPBC18H10.07	ssp2	SPBC18H10.07	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319920283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785394	2539109	2542652	275681	279106	SPCC74.03c	SPAC1687.15	ssp2	gsk3	ucp9	skp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.543315908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785395	2539109	2542544	275681	279001	SPCC74.03c	SPAC18G6.10	ssp2	lem2	ucp9	heh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189908022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785396	2539109	2542507	275681	278965	SPCC74.03c	SPAC18G6.13	ssp2	SPAC18G6.13	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.414350145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785397	2539109	2543412	275681	279834	SPCC74.03c	SPAC637.07	ssp2	moe1	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.069479327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785398	2539109	2540673	275681	277198	SPCC74.03c	SPBC1D7.03	ssp2	mug80	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321887487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785399	2539109	2542971	275681	279410	SPCC74.03c	SPAC105.02c	ssp2	SPAC105.02c	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.817413266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785400	2539109	2542464	275681	278925	SPCC74.03c	SPAC1A6.09c	ssp2	lag1	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.497929876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785401	2539109	2539898	275681	276444	SPCC74.03c	SPBC12D12.07c	ssp2	trx2	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.982319452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785402	2539109	2543510	275681	279928	SPCC74.03c	SPAC30D11.07	ssp2	nth1	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.63119186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785403	2539109	2542168	275681	278643	SPCC74.03c	SPAC17A5.16	ssp2	ftp105	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.288293187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785404	2539109	2542873	275681	279318	SPCC74.03c	SPAC9G1.02	ssp2	wis4	ucp9	wak1|wik1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143095851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785405	2539109	2539903	275681	276449	SPCC74.03c	SPBC15C4.04c	ssp2	SPBC15C4.04c	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9889523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785406	2539109	2542469	275681	278930	SPCC74.03c	SPAC19A8.04	ssp2	erg5	ucp9	cyp61	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.051107282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785407	2539109	2542521	275681	278979	SPCC74.03c	SPAC18G6.12c	ssp2	SPAC18G6.12c	ucp9	B22918-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.125619866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785408	2539109	2542522	275681	278980	SPCC74.03c	SPAC19A8.03	ssp2	ymr1	ucp9	SPAC19A8.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049998438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785409	2539109	2543667	275681	280081	SPCC74.03c	SPAC4H3.02c	ssp2	swc3	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09468714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785410	2539109	2541166	275681	277681	SPCC74.03c	SPBC725.15	ssp2	ura5	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810585296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785411	2539109	2542925	275681	279366	SPCC74.03c	SPAC11E3.04c	ssp2	ubc13	ucp9	spu13|sst5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.226315877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785412	2539109	2542452	275681	278913	SPCC74.03c	SPAC1D4.02c	ssp2	SPAC1D4.02c	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.122184277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785413	2539109	2539250	275681	275820	SPCC74.03c	SPCC1884.02	ssp2	nic1	ucp9	SPCC757.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.00041009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785414	2539109	2543643	275681	280057	SPCC74.03c	SPAC3G9.07c	ssp2	hos2	ucp9	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783058517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785415	2539109	2541899	275681	278389	SPCC74.03c	SPAC22E12.11c	ssp2	set3	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.6845238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785416	2539109	2542193	275681	278668	SPCC74.03c	SPAC9G1.11c	ssp2	spn4	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262070103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785417	2539109	2541739	275681	278233	SPCC74.03c	SPAC2G11.10c	ssp2	SPAC2G11.10c	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810723834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785418	2539109	2543396	275681	279818	SPCC74.03c	SPAC4D7.11	ssp2	dsc4	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.355348436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785419	2539109	2540326	275681	276856	SPCC74.03c	SPBC2G5.06c	ssp2	hmt2	ucp9	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852251909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785420	2539109	2541187	275681	277701	SPCC74.03c	SPBC776.14	ssp2	plh1	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.663080488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785421	2539109	2543631	275681	280045	SPCC74.03c	SPAC458.02c	ssp2	SPAC458.02c	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868349751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785422	2539109	3361269	275681	280345	SPCC74.03c	SPBC31A8.01c	ssp2	rtn1	ucp9	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.192645627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785423	2539109	2540997	275681	277513	SPCC74.03c	SPBC3H7.06c	ssp2	pof9	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913579901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785424	2539109	2543244	275681	279672	SPCC74.03c	SPAC6B12.06c	ssp2	rrg9	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873647204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785425	2539109	2542946	275681	279386	SPCC74.03c	SPAC6F12.03c	ssp2	fsv1	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711339523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785426	2539109	2542976	275681	279414	SPCC74.03c	SPAC9E9.09c	ssp2	atd1	ucp9	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.207499035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785427	2539109	2538880	275681	275459	SPCC74.03c	SPCC1393.09c	ssp2	SPCC1393.09c	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386462487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785428	2539109	2539974	275681	276518	SPCC74.03c	SPBC32H8.07	ssp2	git5	ucp9	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874292428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785429	2539109	2541720	275681	278214	SPCC74.03c	SPAC23H3.13c	ssp2	gpa2	ucp9	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.502707575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785430	2539109	2543495	275681	279914	SPCC74.03c	SPAC513.03	ssp2	mfm2	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042160346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785431	2539109	2540836	275681	277354	SPCC74.03c	SPBC18H10.19	ssp2	vps38	ucp9	atg14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.826102605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785432	2539109	2542254	275681	278724	SPCC74.03c	SPAC30D11.04c	ssp2	nup124	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.094109638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785433	2539109	3361403	275681	280479	SPCC74.03c	SPAC27D7.12c	ssp2	but1	ucp9	SPAC27D7.12|mug107|prx	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143514341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785434	2539109	2542519	275681	278977	SPCC74.03c	SPAC19G12.08	ssp2	scs7	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.337602206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785435	2539109	2541009	275681	277524	SPCC74.03c	SPBC428.04	ssp2	apq12	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.273580713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785436	2539109	2540335	275681	276865	SPCC74.03c	SPBC30B4.03c	ssp2	adn1	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.270586933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785437	2539109	2542813	275681	279260	SPCC74.03c	SPAC29B12.11c	ssp2	SPAC29B12.11c	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931387041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785438	2539109	2542056	275681	278535	SPCC74.03c	SPAC6G9.14	ssp2	SPAC6G9.14	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513853991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785439	2539109	2540990	275681	277506	SPCC74.03c	SPBC36B7.06c	ssp2	mug20	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.236213511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785440	2539109	2538708	275681	275292	SPCC74.03c	SPCC594.01	ssp2	SPCC594.01	ucp9	SPCC736.16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.508931703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785441	2539109	2543224	275681	279652	SPCC74.03c	SPAPB8E5.10	ssp2	SPAPB8E5.10	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189774729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785442	2539109	2541464	275681	277966	SPCC74.03c	SPAC222.08c	ssp2	SPAC222.08c	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.87267771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785443	2539109	2540342	275681	276871	SPCC74.03c	SPBC2G2.01c	ssp2	liz1	ucp9	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.448486832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785444	2539109	2539043	275681	275616	SPCC74.03c	SPCC1235.08c	ssp2	pdh1	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811402877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785445	2539109	2540882	275681	277399	SPCC74.03c	SPBC4F6.08c	ssp2	mrpl39	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.002703147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785446	2539109	2540533	275681	277061	SPCC74.03c	SPBC29A10.16c	ssp2	SPBC29A10.16c	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.068364679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785447	2539109	2541614	275681	278111	SPCC74.03c	SPAC29A4.20	ssp2	elp3	ucp9	kat9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.019649708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785448	2539109	2541565	275681	278063	SPCC74.03c	SPAC1250.03	ssp2	ubc14	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.873183436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785449	2539109	2539711	275681	276264	SPCC74.03c	SPBC1683.09c	ssp2	frp1	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.261805498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785450	2539109	2538690	275681	275275	SPCC74.03c	SPCC1393.05	ssp2	ers1	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.754731106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785451	2539109	2539498	275681	276061	SPCC74.03c	SPCC645.11c	ssp2	mug117	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510817282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785452	2539109	2543011	275681	279449	SPCC74.03c	SPAC10F6.11c	ssp2	atg17	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.61605208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785453	2539109	2542748	275681	279198	SPCC74.03c	SPAC15A10.09c	ssp2	pun1	ucp9	SPAC15A10.09c|sur7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.458642288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785454	2539109	3361520	275681	280596	SPCC74.03c	SPAC1610.02c	ssp2	SPAC1610.02c	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.04622012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785455	2539109	2541628	275681	278124	SPCC74.03c	SPAC110.02	ssp2	pds5	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647960165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785456	2539109	2539538	275681	276100	SPCC74.03c	SPCC364.06	ssp2	nap1	ucp9	nap11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.917550615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785457	2539109	2540001	275681	276545	SPCC74.03c	SPBC1289.13c	ssp2	gmh6	ucp9	SPBC1289.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099704432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785458	2539109	2540910	275681	277426	SPCC74.03c	SPBC577.02	ssp2	rpl3801	ucp9	rpl38-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262726132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785459	2539109	2543113	275681	279545	SPCC74.03c	SPAC3F10.07c	ssp2	erf4	ucp9	mug91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042870349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785460	2539109	2541409	275681	277917	SPCC74.03c	SPBC1271.06c	ssp2	mug96	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702889134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785461	2539109	2542198	275681	278673	SPCC74.03c	SPAC6F12.09	ssp2	rdp1	ucp9	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.500586568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785462	2539109	2541798	275681	278289	SPCC74.03c	SPAC22F3.03c	ssp2	rdh54	ucp9	mug34|tid1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.126509512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785463	2539109	2540442	275681	276970	SPCC74.03c	SPBC25B2.04c	ssp2	mtg1	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.44260847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785464	2539109	2541156	275681	277671	SPCC74.03c	SPBC685.07c	ssp2	rpl2701	ucp9	rpl27-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.821100338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785465	2539109	2543619	275681	280033	SPCC74.03c	SPAC4F10.04	ssp2	ypa1	ucp9	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.918247016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785466	2539109	2542286	275681	278754	SPCC74.03c	SPAC1786.01c	ssp2	ptl2	ucp9	SPAC1786.01c|SPAC31G5.20c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096621901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785467	2539109	2543106	275681	279538	SPCC74.03c	SPAC3A11.13	ssp2	SPAC3A11.13	ucp9	SPAC3H5.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.198384591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785468	2539109	2539925	275681	276469	SPCC74.03c	SPBC16H5.13	ssp2	SPBC16H5.13	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.976836528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785469	2539109	2540881	275681	277398	SPCC74.03c	SPBC577.14c	ssp2	spa1	ucp9	spa	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.8154827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785470	2539109	2542940	275681	279381	SPCC74.03c	SPAC31A2.12	ssp2	SPAC31A2.12	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.99243316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785471	2539109	2540531	275681	277059	SPCC74.03c	SPBC23E6.08	ssp2	sat1	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092779423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785472	2539109	2541617	275681	278114	SPCC74.03c	SPAC27D7.04	ssp2	omt2	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984277205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785473	2539109	2539614	275681	276172	SPCC74.03c	SPBC17D11.08	ssp2	SPBC17D11.08	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983270072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785474	2539109	2541358	275681	277869	SPCC74.03c	SPBP4H10.16c	ssp2	SPBP4H10.16c	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865493392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785475	2539109	2543066	275681	279499	SPCC74.03c	SPAC343.12	ssp2	rds1	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045761026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785476	2539109	2543662	275681	280076	SPCC74.03c	SPAC9.07c	ssp2	SPAC9.07c	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842326761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785477	2539109	2539239	275681	275809	SPCC74.03c	SPCC1020.10	ssp2	oca2	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.665879455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785478	2539109	2541459	275681	277961	SPCC74.03c	SPAC227.11c	ssp2	SPAC227.11c	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047084971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785479	2539109	2542355	275681	278820	SPCC74.03c	SPAC29A4.13	ssp2	SPAC29A4.13	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703979664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785480	2539109	2540699	275681	277223	SPCC74.03c	SPBC800.08	ssp2	gcd10	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039094986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785481	2539109	2540000	275681	276544	SPCC74.03c	SPBC1683.13c	ssp2	cha4	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200626194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785482	2539109	2542906	275681	279350	SPCC74.03c	SPAC13D6.03c	ssp2	trm9	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.197102605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785483	2539109	2541860	275681	278350	SPCC74.03c	SPAC22F3.02	ssp2	atf31	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931999359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785484	2539109	2539729	275681	276281	SPCC74.03c	SPBC11B10.07c	ssp2	ivn1	ucp9	pi004|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.485025057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785485	2539109	2543091	275681	279524	SPCC74.03c	SPAC12G12.15	ssp2	sif3	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.131037076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785486	2539109	2540629	275681	277155	SPCC74.03c	SPBC21D10.09c	ssp2	rkr1	ucp9	SPBC21D10.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632857145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785487	2539109	2540516	275681	277044	SPCC74.03c	SPBC21C3.01c	ssp2	vps13a	ucp9	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.977846107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785488	2539109	2540297	275681	276828	SPCC74.03c	SPBC24C6.08c	ssp2	bhd1	ucp9	bhd	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866429328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785489	2539109	2539928	275681	276472	SPCC74.03c	SPBC1604.08c	ssp2	imp1	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567081568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785490	2539109	2542786	275681	279235	SPCC74.03c	SPAC15A10.07	ssp2	SPAC15A10.07	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.028253731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785491	2539109	2542386	275681	278850	SPCC74.03c	SPAC1805.01c	ssp2	ppk6	ucp9	SPAPJ736.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.135225623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785492	2539109	2539205	275681	275775	SPCC74.03c	SPCC4B3.15	ssp2	mid1	ucp9	dmf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044337908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785493	2539109	2539920	275681	276464	SPCC74.03c	SPBC119.08	ssp2	pmk1	ucp9	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.403507261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785494	2539109	2540140	275681	276677	SPCC74.03c	SPBC16C6.08c	ssp2	qcr6	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.507154058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785495	2539109	2540896	275681	277412	SPCC74.03c	SPBC19C2.13c	ssp2	ctu2	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.715714026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785496	2539109	2540551	275681	277078	SPCC74.03c	SPBC23E6.01c	ssp2	cxr1	ucp9	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.508349913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785497	2539109	2539178	275681	275749	SPCC74.03c	SPCC1682.14	ssp2	rpl1902	ucp9	rpl19-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.506993601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785498	2539109	2541528	275681	278028	SPCC74.03c	SPAC24B11.14	ssp2	SPAC24B11.14	ucp9	SPAC806.10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844037999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785499	2539109	2542702	275681	279155	SPCC74.03c	SPAC8E11.01c	ssp2	SPAC8E11.01c	ucp9	SPAC959.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040315998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785500	2539109	2539700	275681	276253	SPCC74.03c	SPBC1685.15c	ssp2	klp6	ucp9	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.910548024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785501	2539109	2541675	275681	278171	SPCC74.03c	SPAC22F8.12c	ssp2	shf1	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.94577692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785502	2539109	2541806	275681	278297	SPCC74.03c	SPAC4G8.13c	ssp2	prz1	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.333190614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785503	2539109	2543387	275681	279809	SPCC74.03c	SPAPB1E7.02c	ssp2	mcl1	ucp9	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504484329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785504	2539109	2543087	275681	279520	SPCC74.03c	SPAC30C2.04	ssp2	SPAC30C2.04	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.814532581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785505	2539109	2543076	275681	279509	SPCC74.03c	SPAC30C2.07	ssp2	SPAC30C2.07	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.259533048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785506	2539109	2540828	275681	277346	SPCC74.03c	SPBC4B4.06	ssp2	vps25	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.561136966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785507	2539109	2542566	275681	279022	SPCC74.03c	SPAC8C9.12c	ssp2	SPAC8C9.12c	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.175318754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785508	2539109	2541869	275681	278359	SPCC74.03c	SPAC22F3.13	ssp2	tsc1	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.773365763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785509	2539109	2541478	275681	277980	SPCC74.03c	SPAC2F7.17	ssp2	mrf1	ucp9	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.198165436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785510	2539109	2541491	275681	277993	SPCC74.03c	SPAC2C4.16c	ssp2	rps801	ucp9	rps8|rps8-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.26817871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785511	2539109	2539710	275681	276263	SPCC74.03c	SPBC1683.08	ssp2	ght4	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.406587386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785512	2539109	2543333	275681	279756	SPCC74.03c	SPAC694.02	ssp2	SPAC694.02	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988637513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785513	2539109	2541177	275681	277691	SPCC74.03c	SPBC725.05c	ssp2	SPBC725.05c	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517528539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785514	2539109	2542656	275681	279110	SPCC74.03c	SPAC2E1P3.05c	ssp2	SPAC2E1P3.05c	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.500328035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785515	2539109	2540309	275681	276839	SPCC74.03c	SPBC21B10.13c	ssp2	yox1	ucp9	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511876817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785516	2539109	2543646	275681	280060	SPCC74.03c	SPAC821.07c	ssp2	moc3	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.266994959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785517	2539109	2542617	275681	279071	SPCC74.03c	SPAC13A11.01c	ssp2	rga8	ucp9	SPAC2F7.18c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.66271507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785518	2539109	2543501	275681	279919	SPCC74.03c	SPAC664.14	ssp2	amt2	ucp9	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.020319897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785519	2543463	2540528	279883	277056	SPAPB21F2.03	SPBC18H10.04c	slx9	sce3	SPAPB21F2.03	tif48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642638826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785520	2543463	2542237	279883	278709	SPAPB21F2.03	SPAC19E9.02	slx9	fin1	SPAPB21F2.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.395900682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785521	2543463	2543434	279883	279854	SPAPB21F2.03	SPAC8F11.02c	slx9	dph3	SPAPB21F2.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.115860994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785522	2543463	2543270	279883	279698	SPAPB21F2.03	SPAC1002.02	slx9	pom34	SPAPB21F2.03	mug31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643442379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785523	2543463	2540975	279883	277491	SPAPB21F2.03	SPBC354.12	slx9	gpd3	SPAPB21F2.03	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.262613956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785524	2543463	2539331	279883	275897	SPAPB21F2.03	SPCC24B10.09	slx9	rps1702	SPAPB21F2.03	rps17|rps17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322709125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785525	2543463	2542555	279883	279012	SPAPB21F2.03	SPAC1952.06c	slx9	SPAC1952.06c	SPAPB21F2.03	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.848325659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785526	2543463	2542277	279883	278746	SPAPB21F2.03	SPAC17A5.02c	slx9	dbr1	SPAPB21F2.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.731025393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785527	2543463	2538906	279883	275483	SPAPB21F2.03	SPCC1259.03	slx9	rpa12	SPAPB21F2.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.089603022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785528	2543463	2542260	279883	278729	SPAPB21F2.03	SPAC1F12.05	slx9	SPAC1F12.05	SPAPB21F2.03	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.198056177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785529	2543463	2540886	279883	277403	SPAPB21F2.03	SPBC4F6.10	slx9	vps901	SPAPB21F2.03	vps9a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.272369581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785530	2543463	2539250	279883	275820	SPAPB21F2.03	SPCC1884.02	slx9	nic1	SPAPB21F2.03	SPCC757.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869792991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785531	2543463	2542032	279883	278514	SPAPB21F2.03	SPAC23C11.04c	slx9	pnk1	SPAPB21F2.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.675098706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785532	2543463	2539850	279883	276398	SPAPB21F2.03	SPBC15D4.07c	slx9	atg9	SPAPB21F2.03	apg9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923553983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785533	2543463	2539348	279883	275914	SPAPB21F2.03	SPCC18B5.07c	slx9	nup61	SPAPB21F2.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.799798626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785534	2543463	2541614	279883	278111	SPAPB21F2.03	SPAC29A4.20	slx9	elp3	SPAPB21F2.03	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.694076847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785535	2543463	2540930	279883	277446	SPAPB21F2.03	SPBC354.10	slx9	def1	SPAPB21F2.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714221656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785536	2543463	2542725	279883	279176	SPAPB21F2.03	SPAC3A12.10	slx9	rpl2001	SPAPB21F2.03	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325509098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785537	2543463	2543663	279883	280077	SPAPB21F2.03	SPAC644.07	slx9	SPAC644.07	SPAPB21F2.03	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097207756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785538	2543463	2538762	279883	275345	SPAPB21F2.03	SPCC306.04c	slx9	set1	SPAPB21F2.03	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.861095792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785539	2543463	2540829	279883	277347	SPAPB21F2.03	SPBC800.09	slx9	sum2	SPAPB21F2.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.663790618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785540	2543463	2542411	279883	278875	SPAPB21F2.03	SPAC19B12.07c	slx9	SPAC19B12.07c	SPAPB21F2.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.132173069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785541	2543463	2538861	279883	275441	SPAPB21F2.03	SPCC1620.11	slx9	nup97	SPAPB21F2.03	mug87	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.884289281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785542	2543463	2541177	279883	277691	SPAPB21F2.03	SPBC725.05c	slx9	SPBC725.05c	SPAPB21F2.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.43448221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785543	2543153	2539050	279585	275623	SPAC821.05	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC821.05	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.683121144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785544	2543153	2541902	279585	278392	SPAC821.05	SPAC27E2.07	SPAC821.05	pvg2	-	mug53	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.560386179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785545	2543153	2538796	279585	275377	SPAC821.05	SPCC63.06	SPAC821.05	SPCC63.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932578009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785546	2543153	2539841	279585	276389	SPAC821.05	SPBC17D1.05	SPAC821.05	SPBC17D1.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.983360437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785547	2543153	2541257	279585	277771	SPAC821.05	SPBP23A10.14c	SPAC821.05	ell1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.500342299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785548	2543153	2542577	279585	279033	SPAC821.05	SPAC19G12.15c	SPAC821.05	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.432334019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785549	2543153	2540105	279585	276642	SPAC821.05	SPBC106.04	SPAC821.05	ada1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.98516268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785550	2543153	2542080	279585	278557	SPAC821.05	SPAC27D7.03c	SPAC821.05	mei2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.921527635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785551	2543153	2539949	279585	276493	SPAC821.05	SPBC1703.04	SPAC821.05	mlh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.262342376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785552	2543153	2541343	279585	277854	SPAC821.05	SPBPB2B2.19c	SPAC821.05	SPBPB2B2.19c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.345132432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785553	2543153	2542812	279585	279259	SPAC821.05	SPAC6F6.01	SPAC821.05	cch1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.801810247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785554	2543153	2543064	279585	279497	SPAC821.05	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC821.05	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.200508137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785555	2543153	2540131	279585	276668	SPAC821.05	SPBC1778.05c	SPAC821.05	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.625420161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785556	2543153	2542928	279585	279369	SPAC821.05	SPAC1142.06	SPAC821.05	get3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.373919996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785557	2543153	2543592	279585	280007	SPAC821.05	SPAC4F10.18	SPAC821.05	nup37	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.330129735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785558	2543153	2541621	279585	278118	SPAC821.05	SPAC29A4.17c	SPAC821.05	SPAC29A4.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.372327768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785559	2543153	2541135	279585	277650	SPAC821.05	SPBC839.03c	SPAC821.05	SPBC839.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.254067415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785560	2543153	2539930	279585	276474	SPAC821.05	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC821.05	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.481405325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785561	2543153	2539202	279585	275773	SPAC821.05	SPCC162.10	SPAC821.05	ppk33	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318104329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785562	2543153	2540068	279585	276606	SPAC821.05	SPBC1734.12c	SPAC821.05	alg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.963683333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785563	2543153	2539196	279585	275767	SPAC821.05	SPCC1795.03	SPAC821.05	gms1	-	gmn3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.874315152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785564	2543153	2543652	279585	280066	SPAC821.05	SPAC4H3.03c	SPAC821.05	SPAC4H3.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.648737572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785565	2543153	2542614	279585	279068	SPAC821.05	SPAC1399.04c	SPAC821.05	SPAC1399.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.628298134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785566	2543153	2540686	279585	277211	SPAC821.05	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC821.05	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.367871344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785567	2543153	2543103	279585	279535	SPAC821.05	SPAC3F10.09	SPAC821.05	SPAC3F10.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.741218274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785568	2543153	2540999	279585	277515	SPAC821.05	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC821.05	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.114143406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785569	2543153	3361570	279585	280646	SPAC821.05	SPAC750.01	SPAC821.05	SPAC750.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325828076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785570	2543153	2538775	279585	275357	SPAC821.05	SPCC23B6.05c	SPAC821.05	ssb3	-	rpa3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569395651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785571	2543153	2541500	279585	278002	SPAC821.05	SPAC227.18	SPAC821.05	lys3	-	SPAC2F7.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331714024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785572	2543153	2543518	279585	279936	SPAC821.05	SPAC4F8.11	SPAC821.05	SPAC4F8.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.938347529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785573	2543153	2539235	279585	275805	SPAC821.05	SPCC1682.15	SPAC821.05	mug122	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.977082304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785574	2543153	2543043	279585	279478	SPAC821.05	SPAC3F10.13	SPAC821.05	ucp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.656364408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785575	2543153	2542299	279585	278766	SPAC821.05	SPAC18B11.10	SPAC821.05	tup11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.207274586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785576	2543153	2542689	279585	279142	SPAC821.05	SPAC29B12.04	SPAC821.05	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.998118295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785577	2543153	2540919	279585	277435	SPAC821.05	SPBC543.07	SPAC821.05	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.964511692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785578	2543153	2541026	279585	277541	SPAC821.05	SPBC337.09	SPAC821.05	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.618460219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785579	2543153	2539797	279585	276347	SPAC821.05	SPBC16G5.14c	SPAC821.05	rps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.504417305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785580	2543153	2539937	279585	276481	SPAC821.05	SPBC1539.08	SPAC821.05	arf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.635831732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785581	2543153	2540463	279585	276991	SPAC821.05	SPBC2F12.15c	SPAC821.05	pfa3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.649744364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785582	2543153	2540993	279585	277509	SPAC821.05	SPBC342.01c	SPAC821.05	alg6	-	SPBC3F6.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.189328399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785583	2543153	2540425	279585	276953	SPAC821.05	SPBC27.06c	SPAC821.05	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.129988709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785584	2543153	2542023	279585	278506	SPAC821.05	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC821.05	ufd2	-	SPAC145.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.746868448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785585	2543153	2541527	279585	278027	SPAC821.05	SPAC31A2.09c	SPAC821.05	apm4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.990044177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785586	2543153	2539823	279585	276373	SPAC821.05	SPBC16A3.18	SPAC821.05	cip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449709449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785587	2543153	2540364	279585	276893	SPAC821.05	SPBC29B5.02c	SPAC821.05	isp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842823366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785588	2543153	2543563	279585	279979	SPAC821.05	SPAC664.02c	SPAC821.05	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.977684448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785589	2543153	2543584	279585	279999	SPAC821.05	SPAPB1E7.11c	SPAC821.05	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.939023324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785590	2543153	2543319	279585	279743	SPAC821.05	SPAC6B12.09	SPAC821.05	trm10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.312905526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785591	2543153	2539381	279585	275947	SPAC821.05	SPCC1739.10	SPAC821.05	mug33	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.032920486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785592	2543153	2542253	279585	278723	SPAC821.05	SPAC17H9.04c	SPAC821.05	SPAC17H9.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.192853049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785593	2543153	2540825	279585	277343	SPAC821.05	SPBC428.08c	SPAC821.05	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706352415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785594	2543153	2540359	279585	276888	SPAC821.05	SPBC30D10.14	SPAC821.05	SPBC30D10.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1813803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785595	2543153	2542331	279585	278797	SPAC821.05	SPAC1834.05	SPAC821.05	alg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.40258609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785596	2543153	2542568	279585	279024	SPAC821.05	SPAC1952.02	SPAC821.05	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924322915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785597	2543153	2540222	279585	276755	SPAC821.05	SPBC32F12.03c	SPAC821.05	gpx1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.67035034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785598	2543153	2539098	279585	275670	SPAC821.05	SPCC24B10.18	SPAC821.05	SPCC24B10.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.574767514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785599	2543153	2539056	279585	275629	SPAC821.05	SPCC126.11c	SPAC821.05	SPCC126.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.802337464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785600	2543153	2539467	279585	276030	SPAC821.05	SPCC417.07c	SPAC821.05	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.186621211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785601	2543153	3361461	279585	280537	SPAC821.05	SPAC11H11.01	SPAC821.05	sst6	-	cps23	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.258175061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785602	2543153	2542950	279585	279390	SPAC821.05	SPAC12B10.03	SPAC821.05	bun62	-	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.108908902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785603	2543153	2541741	279585	278235	SPAC821.05	SPAC20G4.02c	SPAC821.05	fus1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.199810179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785604	2543153	2542596	279585	279050	SPAC821.05	SPAC1B3.17	SPAC821.05	clr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.901626347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785605	2543153	2538751	279585	275334	SPAC821.05	SPCC1442.07c	SPAC821.05	SPCC1442.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580716851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785606	2543153	2540631	279585	277157	SPAC821.05	SPBC25B2.10	SPAC821.05	SPBC25B2.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812777314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785607	2543153	2540892	279585	277408	SPAC821.05	SPBC530.01	SPAC821.05	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.356301931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785608	2543153	2540903	279585	277419	SPAC821.05	SPBC530.05	SPAC821.05	prt1	-	SPBC530.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86515872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785609	2543153	2543511	279585	279929	SPAC821.05	SPAC4G9.19	SPAC821.05	SPAC4G9.19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.910695073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785610	2543153	2543144	279585	279576	SPAC821.05	SPAC3F10.05c	SPAC821.05	mug113	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.416182888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785611	2543153	2543593	279585	280008	SPAC821.05	SPAC4G9.10	SPAC821.05	arg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.963336314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785612	2543153	2538770	279585	275353	SPAC821.05	SPCC1753.02c	SPAC821.05	git3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.602030516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785613	2543153	2543483	279585	279903	SPAC821.05	SPAPB2B4.02	SPAC821.05	grx5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.507075104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785614	2543153	2538811	279585	275392	SPAC821.05	SPCC330.03c	SPAC821.05	SPCC330.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382511082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785615	2543153	2541892	279585	278382	SPAC821.05	SPAP27G11.02	SPAC821.05	SPAP27G11.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.191600375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785616	2543153	2542123	279585	278599	SPAC821.05	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC821.05	mal3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.413374207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785617	2543153	2543412	279585	279834	SPAC821.05	SPAC637.07	SPAC821.05	moe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.872823247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785618	2543153	2540396	279585	276924	SPAC821.05	SPBC31F10.12	SPAC821.05	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.641501561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785619	2543153	2540673	279585	277198	SPAC821.05	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC821.05	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.504417022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785620	2543153	2542971	279585	279410	SPAC821.05	SPAC105.02c	SPAC821.05	SPAC105.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.208800161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785621	2543153	2541578	279585	278075	SPAC821.05	SPAC25B8.05	SPAC821.05	deg1	-	SPAC25B8.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.016508689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785622	2543153	2541435	279585	277940	SPAC821.05	SPAC2E1P5.02c	SPAC821.05	mug109	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.881353033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785623	2543153	2539484	279585	276047	SPAC821.05	SPCC594.04c	SPAC821.05	SPCC594.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.969032908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785624	2543153	2543313	279585	279737	SPAC821.05	SPAPJ691.03	SPAC821.05	SPAPJ691.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.859657475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785625	2543153	2543667	279585	280081	SPAC821.05	SPAC4H3.02c	SPAC821.05	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.286111759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785626	2543153	2541183	279585	277697	SPAC821.05	SPBC725.14	SPAC821.05	arg6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.177521046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785627	2543153	2539857	279585	276404	SPAC821.05	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC821.05	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.431596188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785628	2543153	2540661	279585	277186	SPAC821.05	SPBC23E6.03c	SPAC821.05	nta1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.861786776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785629	2543153	2540086	279585	276624	SPAC821.05	SPBC16H5.12c	SPAC821.05	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.942824569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785630	2543153	2541824	279585	278315	SPAC821.05	SPAC27E2.02	SPAC821.05	SPAC27E2.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.397056591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785631	2543153	2538769	279585	275352	SPAC821.05	SPCC126.04c	SPAC821.05	sgf73	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.254959517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785632	2543153	2539667	279585	276222	SPAC821.05	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC821.05	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383839594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785633	2543153	2542126	279585	278602	SPAC821.05	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC821.05	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.736206745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785634	2543153	2540200	279585	276733	SPAC821.05	SPBC1709.06	SPAC821.05	dus2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.314863926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785635	2543153	2542976	279585	279414	SPAC821.05	SPAC9E9.09c	SPAC821.05	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.905844233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785636	2543153	2542419	279585	278882	SPAC821.05	SPAC17G6.05c	SPAC821.05	bro1	-	SPAC17G6.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377015078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785637	2543153	2538880	279585	275459	SPAC821.05	SPCC1393.09c	SPAC821.05	SPCC1393.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.70861789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785638	2543153	2539974	279585	276518	SPAC821.05	SPBC32H8.07	SPAC821.05	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.619675523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785639	2543153	2540077	279585	276615	SPAC821.05	SPBC17D11.04c	SPAC821.05	nto1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.041229182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785640	2543153	2541900	279585	278390	SPAC821.05	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC821.05	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.525541018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785641	2543153	2543311	279585	279735	SPAC821.05	SPAC977.15	SPAC821.05	SPAC977.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.715110175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785642	2543153	2539408	279585	275973	SPAC821.05	SPCC576.12c	SPAC821.05	mhf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320820733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785643	2543153	2541009	279585	277524	SPAC821.05	SPBC428.04	SPAC821.05	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.328473076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785644	2543153	2543080	279585	279513	SPAC821.05	SPAC3A11.10c	SPAC821.05	SPAC3A11.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.814339779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785645	2543153	2539715	279585	276268	SPAC821.05	SPBC1778.09	SPAC821.05	SPBC1778.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813804208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785646	2543153	2541389	279585	277900	SPAC821.05	SPBPB2B2.09c	SPAC821.05	SPBPB2B2.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639139693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785647	2543153	2539368	279585	275934	SPAC821.05	SPCC16A11.07	SPAC821.05	coq10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.371041576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785648	2543153	2541536	279585	278036	SPAC821.05	SPAC1071.02	SPAC821.05	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.34332614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785649	2543153	2540201	279585	276734	SPAC821.05	SPBC13A2.04c	SPAC821.05	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.936483529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785650	2543153	2541053	279585	277568	SPAC821.05	SPBC56F2.10c	SPAC821.05	alg5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.00591977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785651	2543153	2539231	279585	275801	SPAC821.05	SPCC1672.03c	SPAC821.05	SPCC1672.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871574348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785652	2543153	2539363	279585	275929	SPAC821.05	SPCC613.02	SPAC821.05	SPCC613.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379824081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785653	2543153	2540104	279585	276641	SPAC821.05	SPBC1709.16c	SPAC821.05	SPBC1709.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865343192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785654	2543153	2541266	279585	277780	SPAC821.05	SPBP16F5.05c	SPAC821.05	yar1	-	SPBP16F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877679045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785655	2543153	2540882	279585	277399	SPAC821.05	SPBC4F6.08c	SPAC821.05	mrpl39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.639060777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785656	2543153	2538884	279585	275462	SPAC821.05	SPCC1393.08	SPAC821.05	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.41312712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785657	2543153	2539421	279585	275986	SPAC821.05	SPCC794.11c	SPAC821.05	ent3	-	SPCC794.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.496388289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785658	2543153	2542255	279585	278725	SPAC821.05	SPAC57A7.08	SPAC821.05	pzh1	-	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.107691696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785659	2543153	2539812	279585	276362	SPAC821.05	SPBC1347.02	SPAC821.05	fkbp39	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.915036878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785660	2543153	2540193	279585	276726	SPAC821.05	SPBC1289.10c	SPAC821.05	adn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637238925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785661	2543153	2540926	279585	277442	SPAC821.05	SPBC359.06	SPAC821.05	mug14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.110455903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785662	2543153	2543193	279585	279622	SPAC821.05	SPAC3F10.11c	SPAC821.05	abc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.20175627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785663	2543153	2538848	279585	275429	SPAC821.05	SPCC613.12c	SPAC821.05	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.544591532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785664	2543153	2540821	279585	277339	SPAC821.05	SPBC800.03	SPAC821.05	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.613366902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785665	2543153	2539932	279585	276476	SPAC821.05	SPBC13E7.07	SPAC821.05	SPBC13E7.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.393974771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785666	2543153	2541670	279585	278166	SPAC821.05	SPAC24H6.13	SPAC821.05	SPAC24H6.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913456949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785667	2543153	2543113	279585	279545	SPAC821.05	SPAC3F10.07c	SPAC821.05	erf4	-	mug91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.434076793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785668	2543153	2542407	279585	278871	SPAC821.05	SPAC19B12.06c	SPAC821.05	SPAC19B12.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87409916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785669	2543153	2543391	279585	279813	SPAC821.05	SPAC4G9.09c	SPAC821.05	arg11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708212834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785670	2543153	2540442	279585	276970	SPAC821.05	SPBC25B2.04c	SPAC821.05	mtg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.130247226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785671	2543153	2540226	279585	276758	SPAC821.05	SPBC32H8.08c	SPAC821.05	omh5	-	pi016|SPACTOKYO_453.20	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.825189763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785672	2543153	2542547	279585	279004	SPAC821.05	SPACUNK4.09	SPAC821.05	SPACUNK4.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.859622027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785673	2543153	2542759	279585	279209	SPAC821.05	SPAC9G1.07	SPAC821.05	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.371006661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785674	2543153	2538762	279585	275345	SPAC821.05	SPCC306.04c	SPAC821.05	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.342298001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785675	2543153	2541370	279585	277881	SPAC821.05	SPBP8B7.07c	SPAC821.05	set6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808619481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785676	2543153	2540519	279585	277047	SPAC821.05	SPBC21C3.14c	SPAC821.05	SPBC21C3.14c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.499953011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785677	2543153	2543670	279585	280084	SPAC821.05	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPAC821.05	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86680331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785678	2543153	2541909	279585	278399	SPAC821.05	SPAC227.01c	SPAC821.05	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.13182443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785679	2543153	2540800	279585	277319	SPAC821.05	SPBC409.20c	SPAC821.05	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.249964615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785680	2543153	2539246	279585	275816	SPAC821.05	SPCC18.13	SPAC821.05	SPCC18.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.826729098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785681	2543153	2541100	279585	277615	SPAC821.05	SPBC651.04	SPAC821.05	SPBC651.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045205897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785682	2543153	2543662	279585	280076	SPAC821.05	SPAC9.07c	SPAC821.05	SPAC9.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.941645489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785683	2543153	2542955	279585	279395	SPAC821.05	SPAC11E3.12	SPAC821.05	SPAC11E3.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.316327817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785684	2543153	2541425	279585	277930	SPAC821.05	SPAC2C4.17c	SPAC821.05	msy2	-	SPAC2C4.17c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095373239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785685	2543153	2538756	279585	275339	SPAC821.05	SPCC1795.10c	SPAC821.05	SPCC1795.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.000666897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785686	2543153	2543368	279585	279790	SPAC821.05	SPAC630.06c	SPAC821.05	SPAC630.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324522926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785687	2543153	2541531	279585	278031	SPAC821.05	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC821.05	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380900657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785688	2543153	2540346	279585	276875	SPAC821.05	SPBC2F12.03c	SPAC821.05	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.265291819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785689	2543153	2541470	279585	277972	SPAC821.05	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPAC821.05	rpb9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.62390528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785690	2543153	2540304	279585	276834	SPAC821.05	SPBC354.13	SPAC821.05	rga6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.438254109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785691	2543153	2540829	279585	277347	SPAC821.05	SPBC800.09	SPAC821.05	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.941494486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785692	2543153	2541229	279585	277743	SPAC821.05	SPBC839.05c	SPAC821.05	rps1701	-	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.937571176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785693	2543153	2542222	279585	278695	SPAC821.05	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC821.05	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.586660555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785694	2543153	2543437	279585	279857	SPAC821.05	SPAPB1A10.14	SPAC821.05	pof15	-	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.25778646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785695	2543153	2543602	279585	280017	SPAC821.05	SPAPB1A11.04c	SPAC821.05	mca1	-	SPAPB1A11.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093033287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785696	2543153	2541773	279585	278267	SPAC821.05	SPAC23H4.02	SPAC821.05	ppk9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.72286028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785697	2543153	2541789	279585	278281	SPAC821.05	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC821.05	iwr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.191928438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785698	2543153	2540297	279585	276828	SPAC821.05	SPBC24C6.08c	SPAC821.05	bhd1	-	bhd	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986014018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785699	2543153	2540928	279585	277444	SPAC821.05	SPBC3E7.10	SPAC821.05	fma1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.341651899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785700	2543153	2540920	279585	277436	SPAC821.05	SPBC342.03	SPAC821.05	gas4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.457598263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785701	2543153	2540568	279585	277095	SPAC821.05	SPBC28F2.08c	SPAC821.05	SPBC28F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.562811467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785702	2543153	2543109	279585	279541	SPAC821.05	SPAC3G6.09c	SPAC821.05	tps2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.254973066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785703	2543153	2539207	279585	275777	SPAC821.05	SPCC285.09c	SPAC821.05	cgs2	-	pde1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.107548293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785704	2543153	2539702	279585	276255	SPAC821.05	SPBC1604.12	SPAC821.05	SPBC1604.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.814356822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785705	2543153	2542442	279585	278904	SPAC821.05	SPACUNK12.02c	SPAC821.05	cmk1	-	CaMK-I|SPAC25D11.02C	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.069289597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785706	2543153	2542607	279585	279061	SPAC821.05	SPAC18B11.02c	SPAC821.05	SPAC18B11.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443679235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785707	2543153	2543124	279585	279556	SPAC821.05	SPAC3A11.06	SPAC821.05	mvp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.334463969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785708	2543153	5802702	279585	857840	SPAC821.05	SPCC1235.15	SPAC821.05	dga1	-	SPCC548.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377983431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785709	2543153	2543380	279585	279802	SPAC821.05	SPAC4G9.16c	SPAC821.05	rpl901	-	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.989639418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785710	2543153	2540146	279585	276683	SPAC821.05	SPBC17A3.06	SPAC821.05	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.977418661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785711	2543153	2542021	279585	278504	SPAC821.05	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC821.05	tos4	-	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.201535028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785712	2543153	2541539	279585	278039	SPAC821.05	SPAP27G11.12	SPAC821.05	SPAP27G11.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.54405642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785713	2543153	2543387	279585	279809	SPAC821.05	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC821.05	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.99170692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785714	2543153	2538854	279585	275435	SPAC821.05	SPCP1E11.05c	SPAC821.05	are2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.49648476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785715	2543153	2540360	279585	276889	SPAC821.05	SPBC2G5.01	SPAC821.05	SPBC2G5.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.755681705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785716	2543153	2540558	279585	277085	SPAC821.05	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC821.05	clr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.019254997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785717	2543153	2539583	279585	276142	SPAC821.05	SPCC777.04	SPAC821.05	SPCC777.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.904312611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785718	2543153	2539743	279585	276295	SPAC821.05	SPBC16A3.08c	SPAC821.05	oga1	-	SPBC16A3.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.280624943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785719	2543153	2542424	279585	278886	SPAC821.05	SPAC1805.14	SPAC821.05	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.733337636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785720	2543153	2541050	279585	277565	SPAC821.05	SPBC428.05c	SPAC821.05	arg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.671409826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785721	2543153	2541646	279585	278142	SPAC821.05	SPAC750.06c	SPAC821.05	SPAC750.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.479492004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785722	2543153	2543333	279585	279756	SPAC821.05	SPAC694.02	SPAC821.05	SPAC694.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.765193227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785723	2543153	2542656	279585	279110	SPAC821.05	SPAC2E1P3.05c	SPAC821.05	SPAC2E1P3.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377602285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785724	2543153	2543472	279585	279892	SPAC821.05	SPAC959.04c	SPAC821.05	omh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.251891543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785725	2543153	2542680	279585	279133	SPAC821.05	SPAC26F1.09	SPAC821.05	gyp51	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.15396112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785726	2543153	2541576	279585	278073	SPAC821.05	SPBC1348.02	SPAC821.05	SPBC1348.02	-	SPAC1348.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.461733008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785727	2543153	3361512	279585	280588	SPAC821.05	SPAC3C7.01c	SPAC821.05	sac12	-	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.320591882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785728	2543153	2543501	279585	279919	SPAC821.05	SPAC664.14	SPAC821.05	amt2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819726799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785729	2543153	2541236	279585	277750	SPAC821.05	SPBC887.11	SPAC821.05	pus2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.905057811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785730	2540680	2539050	277205	275623	SPBC26H8.05c	SPCC11E10.08	pph3	rik1	SPBC26H8.05c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.807834335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785731	2540680	2542862	277205	279308	SPBC26H8.05c	SPAC140.03	pph3	arb1	SPBC26H8.05c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571582128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785732	2540680	2541633	277205	278129	SPBC26H8.05c	SPAC664.01c	pph3	swi6	SPBC26H8.05c	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.97259319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785733	2540680	2539420	277205	275985	SPBC26H8.05c	SPCC970.07c	pph3	raf2	SPBC26H8.05c	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.419093839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785734	2540680	2541522	277205	278023	SPBC26H8.05c	SPAC23E2.01	pph3	fep1	SPBC26H8.05c	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.803615247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785735	2540680	2540825	277205	277343	SPBC26H8.05c	SPBC428.08c	pph3	clr4	SPBC26H8.05c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.960492903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785736	2540680	2542239	277205	278711	SPBC26H8.05c	SPAC18G6.02c	pph3	chp1	SPBC26H8.05c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576863037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785737	2540680	2539051	277205	275624	SPBC26H8.05c	SPCC1183.11	pph3	msy1	SPBC26H8.05c	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776666788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785738	2540680	2543020	277205	279456	SPBC26H8.05c	SPAC10F6.13c	pph3	SPAC10F6.13c	SPBC26H8.05c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928923035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785739	2540680	2542519	277205	278977	SPBC26H8.05c	SPAC19G12.08	pph3	scs7	SPBC26H8.05c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.407979421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785740	2540680	2541009	277205	277524	SPBC26H8.05c	SPBC428.04	pph3	apq12	SPBC26H8.05c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.440561351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785741	2540680	2540533	277205	277061	SPBC26H8.05c	SPBC29A10.16c	pph3	SPBC29A10.16c	SPBC26H8.05c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.186505379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785742	2540680	2538884	277205	275462	SPBC26H8.05c	SPCC1393.08	pph3	SPCC1393.08	SPBC26H8.05c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451977109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785743	2540680	2541963	277205	278449	SPBC26H8.05c	SPAC21E11.04	pph3	aca1	SPBC26H8.05c	ppr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042966445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785744	2540680	2538848	277205	275429	SPBC26H8.05c	SPCC613.12c	pph3	raf1	SPBC26H8.05c	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.998644263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785745	2540680	2542198	277205	278673	SPBC26H8.05c	SPAC6F12.09	pph3	rdp1	SPBC26H8.05c	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642524595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785746	2540680	2539354	277205	275920	SPBC26H8.05c	SPCC4F11.03c	pph3	SPCC4F11.03c	SPBC26H8.05c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.312641488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785747	2540680	2543220	277205	279648	SPBC26H8.05c	SPAPB21F2.02	pph3	SPAPB21F2.02	SPBC26H8.05c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773624216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785748	2539291	2542207	275859	278682	SPCC757.10	SPAC17H9.10c	vph2	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580148529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785749	2539291	2539147	275859	275719	SPCC757.10	SPCC622.12c	vph2	gdh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.449856876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785750	2539291	2541902	275859	278392	SPCC757.10	SPAC27E2.07	vph2	pvg2	-	mug53	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980817484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785751	2539291	2538721	275859	275305	SPCC757.10	SPCC1494.10	vph2	adn3	-	SPCC70.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.987353972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785752	2539291	2542577	275859	279033	SPCC757.10	SPAC19G12.15c	vph2	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.339749071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785753	2539291	2543617	275859	280031	SPCC757.10	SPAC4A8.10	vph2	SPAC4A8.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.80800652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785754	2539291	2542080	275859	278557	SPCC757.10	SPAC27D7.03c	vph2	mei2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258814418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785755	2539291	2542585	275859	279040	SPCC757.10	SPAC31A2.13c	vph2	sft1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391363028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785756	2539291	3361499	275859	280575	SPCC757.10	SPAC25H1.09	vph2	mde5	-	SPAC4A8.01|meu30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.845784585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785757	2539291	2542518	275859	278976	SPCC757.10	SPAC1B3.16c	vph2	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.277728638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785758	2539291	2540913	275859	277429	SPCC757.10	SPBC56F2.08c	vph2	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.748741697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785759	2539291	2539452	275859	276015	SPCC757.10	SPCC70.03c	vph2	SPCC70.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.958435421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785760	2539291	2541426	275859	277931	SPCC757.10	SPAC227.06	vph2	SPAC227.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.984532659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785761	2539291	2541570	275859	278067	SPCC757.10	SPAC6G9.09c	vph2	rpl2401	-	rpl24|rpl24-01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877319395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785762	2539291	2540026	275859	276570	SPCC757.10	SPBC16D10.08c	vph2	hsp104	-	SPBC16D10.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040726409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785763	2539291	2542812	275859	279259	SPCC757.10	SPAC6F6.01	vph2	cch1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.615707625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785764	2539291	2539940	275859	276484	SPCC757.10	SPBC16A3.10	vph2	SPBC16A3.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324903373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785765	2539291	2539167	275859	275738	SPCC757.10	SPCC1281.08	vph2	wtf11	-	meu24	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.932131358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785766	2539291	2539165	275859	275736	SPCC757.10	SPCC1281.04	vph2	SPCC1281.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44338086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785767	2539291	2542671	275859	279124	SPCC757.10	SPAC824.09c	vph2	SPAC824.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.185280879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785768	2539291	2540131	275859	276668	SPCC757.10	SPBC1778.05c	vph2	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.619527849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785769	2539291	2539855	275859	276403	SPCC757.10	SPBC14F5.07	vph2	doa10	-	ssm4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.696120955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785770	2539291	2543575	275859	279990	SPCC757.10	SPAC644.13c	vph2	SPAC644.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.028925716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785771	2539291	2540524	275859	277052	SPCC757.10	SPBC21B10.08c	vph2	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.031286725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785772	2539291	2540995	275859	277511	SPCC757.10	SPBC337.16	vph2	cho1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.771202037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785773	2539291	2540528	275859	277056	SPCC757.10	SPBC18H10.04c	vph2	sce3	-	tif48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.572494508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785774	2539291	2541621	275859	278118	SPCC757.10	SPAC29A4.17c	vph2	SPAC29A4.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.3210889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785775	2539291	2538993	275859	275567	SPCC757.10	SPCC162.12	vph2	tco89	-	SPCC1753.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.558663998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785776	2539291	2542237	275859	278709	SPCC757.10	SPAC19E9.02	vph2	fin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.190384276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785777	2539291	2540068	275859	276606	SPCC757.10	SPBC1734.12c	vph2	alg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.067922201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785778	2539291	2541117	275859	277632	SPCC757.10	SPBC646.13	vph2	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.976108016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785779	2539291	2540161	275859	276696	SPCC757.10	SPBC13E7.03c	vph2	SPBC13E7.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.771802431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785780	2539291	2542502	275859	278960	SPCC757.10	SPAC139.06	vph2	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.660663899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785781	2539291	2540474	275859	277002	SPCC757.10	SPBC26H8.09c	vph2	snf59	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865197556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785782	2539291	2543572	275859	279987	SPCC757.10	SPAC4G8.04	vph2	SPAC4G8.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509797243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785783	2539291	2543432	275859	279852	SPCC757.10	SPAC4G8.05	vph2	ppk14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03555272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785784	2539291	2540139	275859	276676	SPCC757.10	SPBC1773.06c	vph2	adh8	-	SPBC1773.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567424754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785785	2539291	2540686	275859	277211	SPCC757.10	SPBC21D10.10	vph2	bdc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.198135235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785786	2539291	2539201	275859	275772	SPCC757.10	SPCC188.09c	vph2	pfl4	-	SPCC188.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.618943558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785787	2539291	2542701	275859	279154	SPCC757.10	SPAC26H5.05	vph2	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.449978957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785788	2539291	2541584	275859	278081	SPCC757.10	SPAP32A8.02	vph2	SPAP32A8.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147479621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785789	2539291	2542103	275859	278579	SPCC757.10	SPAC31G5.11	vph2	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.746079907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785790	2539291	2541082	275859	277597	SPCC757.10	SPBC577.11	vph2	SPBC577.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.963926317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785791	2539291	2540535	275859	277062	SPCC757.10	SPBC215.01	vph2	SPBC215.01	-	SPBC3B9.20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.417474626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785792	2539291	3361436	275859	280512	SPCC757.10	SPAC1296.01c	vph2	SPAC1296.01c	-	SPAC22F3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.923493995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785793	2539291	2540975	275859	277491	SPCC757.10	SPBC354.12	vph2	gpd3	-	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.284535784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785794	2539291	2541795	275859	278286	SPCC757.10	SPAC2E1P3.02c	vph2	amt3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387775165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785795	2539291	2541208	275859	277722	SPCC757.10	SPBC887.04c	vph2	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.626623082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785796	2539291	2542677	275859	279130	SPCC757.10	SPAC26F1.10c	vph2	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.48255482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785797	2539291	2541012	275859	277527	SPCC757.10	SPBC3H7.12	vph2	rav2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.34698026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785798	2539291	2540979	275859	277495	SPCC757.10	SPBC3H7.10	vph2	elp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381824223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785799	2539291	2538775	275859	275357	SPCC757.10	SPCC23B6.05c	vph2	ssb3	-	rpa3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.840172915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785800	2539291	2539463	275859	276026	SPCC757.10	SPCC550.11	vph2	SPCC550.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.841164422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785801	2539291	2543590	275859	280005	SPCC757.10	SPAC4C5.03	vph2	SPAC4C5.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.410275111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785802	2539291	2542696	275859	279149	SPCC757.10	SPAC29B12.03	vph2	spd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.337339021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785803	2539291	2538801	275859	275382	SPCC757.10	SPCC285.13c	vph2	nup60	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03949752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785804	2539291	2542724	275859	279175	SPCC757.10	SPAC767.01c	vph2	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.280540708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785805	2539291	2540220	275859	276753	SPCC757.10	SPBC337.03	vph2	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.406628564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785806	2539291	2540095	275859	276633	SPCC757.10	SPBC115.03	vph2	SPBC115.03	-	SPBC839.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382450878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785807	2539291	3361381	275859	280457	SPCC757.10	SPAC12G12.01c	vph2	SPAC12G12.01c	-	SPAC630.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870525572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785808	2539291	2539797	275859	276347	SPCC757.10	SPBC16G5.14c	vph2	rps3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.151203844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785809	2539291	2538833	275859	275414	SPCC757.10	SPCP1E11.11	vph2	puf6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.132128519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785810	2539291	2539064	275859	275636	SPCC757.10	SPCC126.06	vph2	twf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.197733915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785811	2539291	2543048	275859	279483	SPCC757.10	SPAC3F10.02c	vph2	trk1	-	sptrk	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.322709418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785812	2539291	2543636	275859	280050	SPCC757.10	SPAC3H8.08c	vph2	SPAC3H8.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.866078088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785813	2539291	2543547	275859	279964	SPCC757.10	SPAC926.02	vph2	SPAC926.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582692608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785814	2539291	2541346	275859	277857	SPCC757.10	SPBP8B7.08c	vph2	ppm1	-	SPBP8B7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.195961474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785815	2539291	2540463	275859	276991	SPCC757.10	SPBC2F12.15c	vph2	pfa3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.694705756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785816	2539291	2539063	275859	275635	SPCC757.10	SPCC126.12	vph2	SPCC126.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.971275781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785817	2539291	2540993	275859	277509	SPCC757.10	SPBC342.01c	vph2	alg6	-	SPBC3F6.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.509965125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785818	2539291	2542022	275859	278505	SPCC757.10	SPAC23A1.03	vph2	apt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.765141548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785819	2539291	2542165	275859	278641	SPCC757.10	SPAC1782.08c	vph2	rex3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.626976746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785820	2539291	2538716	275859	275300	SPCC757.10	SPCC13B11.02c	vph2	SPCC13B11.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991955814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785821	2539291	2542023	275859	278506	SPCC757.10	SPAC20H4.10	vph2	ufd2	-	SPAC145.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439409339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785822	2539291	2541527	275859	278027	SPCC757.10	SPAC31A2.09c	vph2	apm4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637323047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785823	2539291	2542180	275859	278655	SPCC757.10	SPAC589.07c	vph2	atg1801	-	atg18|atg18a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991369091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785824	2539291	2541707	275859	278202	SPCC757.10	SPAC29E6.01	vph2	pof11	-	SPAC30.05|mug156	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.120863492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785825	2539291	2543308	275859	279732	SPCC757.10	SPAC694.04c	vph2	SPAC694.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.627598906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785826	2539291	2541960	275859	278447	SPCC757.10	SPAC6G9.15c	vph2	SPAC6G9.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448485031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785827	2539291	2540830	275859	277348	SPCC757.10	SPBC18H10.16	vph2	can1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980536261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785828	2539291	2540595	275859	277121	SPCC757.10	SPBC21C3.02c	vph2	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.831936794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785829	2539291	2543686	275859	280100	SPCC757.10	SPAC3C7.14c	vph2	obr1	-	apt1|uhp1|p25	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932091859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785830	2539291	2541311	275859	277823	SPCC757.10	SPBP8B7.09c	vph2	los1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.385161405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785831	2539291	2543551	275859	279968	SPCC757.10	SPAC4G8.06c	vph2	trm12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.720496323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785832	2539291	2543563	275859	279979	SPCC757.10	SPAC664.02c	vph2	arp8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.50872047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785833	2539291	2538969	275859	275543	SPCC757.10	SPCC1840.12	vph2	opt3	-	SPCC1840.12|SPCC965.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.249535434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785834	2539291	2541522	275859	278023	SPCC757.10	SPAC23E2.01	vph2	fep1	-	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.100936125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785835	2539291	2540415	275859	276943	SPCC757.10	SPBC30B4.06c	vph2	SPBC30B4.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040646879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785836	2539291	2539980	275859	276524	SPCC757.10	SPBC1773.14	vph2	arg7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808530326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785837	2539291	2541663	275859	278159	SPCC757.10	SPAC22G7.08	vph2	ppk8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.500953951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785838	2539291	2538972	275859	275546	SPCC757.10	SPCC1739.15	vph2	wtf21	-	wtf3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326113901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785839	2539291	2538906	275859	275483	SPCC757.10	SPCC1259.03	vph2	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.765415621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785840	2539291	2539092	275859	275664	SPCC757.10	SPCC1259.08	vph2	SPCC1259.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.270573222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785841	2539291	2542213	275859	278687	SPCC757.10	SPAC3G6.13c	vph2	rpl4101	-	rpl41-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.502741937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785842	2539291	2541926	275859	278414	SPCC757.10	SPAC222.14c	vph2	SPAC222.14c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.075080157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785843	2539291	2541021	275859	277536	SPCC757.10	SPBC3B8.10c	vph2	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.811066113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785844	2539291	2541246	275859	277760	SPCC757.10	SPBC8E4.02c	vph2	SPBC8E4.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852221643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785845	2539291	2540893	275859	277409	SPCC757.10	SPBC543.10	vph2	get1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.681889866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785846	2539291	2539310	275859	275877	SPCC757.10	SPCC285.17	vph2	spp27	-	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.990744802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785847	2539291	2542554	275859	279011	SPCC757.10	SPAC1952.03	vph2	otu2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.982560628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785848	2539291	2542331	275859	278797	SPCC757.10	SPAC1834.05	vph2	alg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.483655774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785849	2539291	2541275	275859	277789	SPCC757.10	SPBC947.06c	vph2	SPBC947.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994993297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785850	2539291	2542311	275859	278777	SPCC757.10	SPAC16A10.05c	vph2	dad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.746201034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785851	2539291	2542950	275859	279390	SPCC757.10	SPAC12B10.03	vph2	bun62	-	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.919643689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785852	2539291	2541035	275859	277550	SPCC757.10	SPBC3E7.05c	vph2	SPBC3E7.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819946434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785853	2539291	2541801	275859	278292	SPCC757.10	SPAC2F7.08c	vph2	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.188088721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785854	2539291	2541250	275859	277764	SPCC757.10	SPBC8D2.17	vph2	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.955166534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785855	2539291	2540892	275859	277408	SPCC757.10	SPBC530.01	vph2	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.253884534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785856	2539291	2543511	275859	279929	SPCC757.10	SPAC4G9.19	vph2	SPAC4G9.19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517311978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785857	2539291	2541776	275859	278270	SPCC757.10	SPAC23H3.05c	vph2	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.769451342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785858	2539291	2541093	275859	277608	SPCC757.10	SPBC646.08c	vph2	SPBC646.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811008287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785859	2539291	2543144	275859	279576	SPCC757.10	SPAC3F10.05c	vph2	mug113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.412286489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785860	2539291	2543445	275859	279865	SPCC757.10	SPAC4F10.13c	vph2	mpd2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.079147539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785861	2539291	2539628	275859	276185	SPCC757.10	SPBC1604.03c	vph2	SPBC1604.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.765013617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785862	2539291	2540041	275859	276580	SPCC757.10	SPBC1198.03c	vph2	SPBC1198.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.31748037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785863	2539291	2541160	275859	277675	SPCC757.10	SPBC725.09c	vph2	hob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.890706783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785864	2539291	3361491	275859	280567	SPCC757.10	SPAC1805.08	vph2	dlc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.620669955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785865	2539291	2542507	275859	278965	SPCC757.10	SPAC18G6.13	vph2	SPAC18G6.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.229251429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785866	2539291	2540352	275859	276881	SPCC757.10	SPBC215.03c	vph2	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.850035125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785867	2539291	2543412	275859	279834	SPCC757.10	SPAC637.07	vph2	moe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.954900181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785868	2539291	2539733	275859	276285	SPCC757.10	SPBC16E9.12c	vph2	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378316613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785869	2539291	2540150	275859	276687	SPCC757.10	SPBC16E9.14c	vph2	zrg17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.980251085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785870	2539291	2542464	275859	278925	SPCC757.10	SPAC1A6.09c	vph2	lag1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.678775145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785871	2539291	2539073	275859	275645	SPCC757.10	SPCC1322.02	vph2	pxd1	-	SPCC1322.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.697824617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785872	2539291	2540886	275859	277403	SPCC757.10	SPBC4F6.10	vph2	vps901	-	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.132939398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785873	2539291	2543531	275859	279949	SPCC757.10	SPAC926.06c	vph2	SPAC926.06c	-	lrr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.686232378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785874	2539291	2542921	275859	279362	SPCC757.10	SPAC1093.01	vph2	ppr5	-	SPAC12B10.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.609463428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785875	2539291	2542428	275859	278890	SPCC757.10	SPAC1805.12c	vph2	uep1	-	ubi2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101217001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785876	2539291	2539454	275859	276017	SPCC757.10	SPCC622.15c	vph2	SPCC622.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.839501177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785877	2539291	2543231	275859	279659	SPCC757.10	SPAPB8E5.08	vph2	SPAPB8E5.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820660501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785878	2539291	2539603	275859	276161	SPCC757.10	SPBC1289.06c	vph2	ppr8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.671017919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785879	2539291	2538871	275859	275450	SPCC757.10	SPCC1259.14c	vph2	meu27	-	B8647-6	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.802985209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785880	2539291	2539857	275859	276404	SPCC757.10	SPBC1604.20c	vph2	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.987045075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785881	2539291	2543643	275859	280057	SPCC757.10	SPAC3G9.07c	vph2	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452390753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785882	2539291	2539586	275859	276145	SPCC757.10	SPCC70.08c	vph2	SPCC70.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331584192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785883	2539291	2540086	275859	276624	SPCC757.10	SPBC16H5.12c	vph2	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.801720355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785884	2539291	2542013	275859	278496	SPCC757.10	SPAC20H4.11c	vph2	rho5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876442696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785885	2539291	2543396	275859	279818	SPCC757.10	SPAC4D7.11	vph2	dsc4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.404374013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785886	2539291	2538769	275859	275352	SPCC757.10	SPCC126.04c	vph2	sgf73	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.440596719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785887	2539291	2540176	275859	276709	SPCC757.10	SPBC1709.01	vph2	chs2	-	SPBC1734.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32291528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785888	2539291	2539000	275859	275574	SPCC757.10	SPCC1450.06c	vph2	grx3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.961393218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785889	2539291	2540997	275859	277513	SPCC757.10	SPBC3H7.06c	vph2	pof9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.640110716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785890	2539291	2542946	275859	279386	SPCC757.10	SPAC6F12.03c	vph2	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.343735802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785891	2539291	2540290	275859	276821	SPCC757.10	SPBC29A3.02c	vph2	his7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.53385668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785892	2539291	2539815	275859	276365	SPCC757.10	SPBC1105.02c	vph2	lys4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77380844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785893	2539291	2540961	275859	277477	SPCC757.10	SPBC36B7.03	vph2	sec63	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.880483749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785894	2539291	2539217	275859	275787	SPCC757.10	SPCC1223.03c	vph2	gut2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378481078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785895	2539291	2541720	275859	278214	SPCC757.10	SPAC23H3.13c	vph2	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.841842837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785896	2539291	2542498	275859	278957	SPCC757.10	SPACUNK4.16c	vph2	SPACUNK4.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149592489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785897	2539291	2540394	275859	276922	SPCC757.10	SPBC2D10.09	vph2	snr1	-	SPBC2D10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.177720654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785898	2539291	2540836	275859	277354	SPCC757.10	SPBC18H10.19	vph2	vps38	-	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.569626648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785899	2539291	2538841	275859	275422	SPCC757.10	SPCC550.03c	vph2	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979141389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785900	2539291	2542254	275859	278724	SPCC757.10	SPAC30D11.04c	vph2	nup124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2606973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785901	2539291	2540318	275859	276848	SPCC757.10	SPBC30B4.04c	vph2	sol1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.022171181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785902	2539291	2539953	275859	276497	SPCC757.10	SPBC1709.11c	vph2	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.328259694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785903	2539291	2539049	275859	275622	SPCC757.10	SPCC11E10.09c	vph2	SPCC11E10.09c	-	SPCC188.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925787744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785904	2539291	2542056	275859	278535	SPCC757.10	SPAC6G9.14	vph2	SPAC6G9.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.022323785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785905	2539291	2542439	275859	278901	SPCC757.10	SPAC17A5.08	vph2	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.915397446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785906	2539291	2540387	275859	276915	SPCC757.10	SPBC24C6.04	vph2	SPBC24C6.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.987842536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785907	2539291	2543443	275859	279863	SPCC757.10	SPAC3H1.12c	vph2	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.982638293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785908	2539291	2541389	275859	277900	SPCC757.10	SPBPB2B2.09c	vph2	SPBPB2B2.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.702847116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785909	2539291	2539740	275859	276292	SPCC757.10	SPBC1685.04	vph2	SPBC1685.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926648374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785910	2539291	2541112	275859	277627	SPCC757.10	SPBC725.07	vph2	pex5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097666803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785911	2539291	2540201	275859	276734	SPCC757.10	SPBC13A2.04c	vph2	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44168695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785912	2539291	2540342	275859	276871	SPCC757.10	SPBC2G2.01c	vph2	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.121502272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785913	2539291	2540967	275859	277483	SPCC757.10	SPBC36B7.08c	vph2	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.506849695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785914	2539291	2542267	275859	278736	SPCC757.10	SPAPYUK71.03c	vph2	syn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.909459119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785915	2539291	2541283	275859	277796	SPCC757.10	SPBP8B7.02	vph2	rng9	-	SPBP8B7.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.450353062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785916	2539291	2539427	275859	275992	SPCC757.10	SPCC663.15c	vph2	SPCC663.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507674225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785917	2539291	2541266	275859	277780	SPCC757.10	SPBP16F5.05c	vph2	yar1	-	SPBP16F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.129348593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785918	2539291	2539711	275859	276264	SPCC757.10	SPBC1683.09c	vph2	frp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.903778445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785919	2539291	2540229	275859	276761	SPCC757.10	SPBC31F10.15c	vph2	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.339085121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785920	2539291	2542187	275859	278662	SPCC757.10	SPAC57A7.09	vph2	SPAC57A7.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511933944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785921	2539291	2541488	275859	277990	SPCC757.10	SPAC227.17c	vph2	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770175771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785922	2539291	2540515	275859	277043	SPCC757.10	SPBC29A10.09c	vph2	tri1	-	SPBC29A10.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038083085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785923	2539291	2543477	275859	279897	SPCC757.10	SPAPB2B4.04c	vph2	SPAPB2B4.04c	-	pmc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.533895557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785924	2539291	2539993	275859	276537	SPCC757.10	SPBC1105.05	vph2	exg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505383989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785925	2539291	2540193	275859	276726	SPCC757.10	SPBC1289.10c	vph2	adn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.294589947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785926	2539291	2539605	275859	276163	SPCC757.10	SPBC1105.13c	vph2	SPBC1105.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.873157584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785927	2539291	2541378	275859	277889	SPCC757.10	SPBP8B7.21	vph2	ubp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.203352449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785928	2539291	3361134	275859	280210	SPCC757.10	SPCC737.09c	vph2	hmt1	-	SPCC74.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51445654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785929	2539291	2543139	275859	279571	SPCC757.10	SPAC12G12.03	vph2	cip2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.507535303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785930	2539291	2540930	275859	277446	SPCC757.10	SPBC354.10	vph2	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.268940916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785931	2539291	2540589	275859	277115	SPCC757.10	SPBC20F10.06	vph2	mad2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.80749619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785932	2539291	2541793	275859	278284	SPCC757.10	SPAC22H10.02	vph2	SPAC22H10.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.557797596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785933	2539291	2542725	275859	279176	SPCC757.10	SPAC3A12.10	vph2	rpl2001	-	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197405542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785934	2539291	2539908	275859	276454	SPCC757.10	SPBC13E7.06	vph2	msd1	-	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.567633222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785935	2539291	2541525	275859	278025	SPCC757.10	SPAC27D7.02c	vph2	SPAC27D7.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.679842519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785936	2539291	2539706	275859	276259	SPCC757.10	SPBC16G5.13	vph2	ptf2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205461064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785937	2539291	2542283	275859	278751	SPCC757.10	SPAC27F1.08	vph2	pdt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.426390622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785938	2539291	2539499	275859	276062	SPCC757.10	SPCC622.08c	vph2	hta1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097049797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785939	2539291	2543628	275859	280042	SPCC757.10	SPAC3H8.10	vph2	spo20	-	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.627332706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785940	2539291	2542327	275859	278793	SPCC757.10	SPAC16C9.06c	vph2	upf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51516107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785941	2539291	2539438	275859	276001	SPCC757.10	SPCC4B3.07	vph2	nro1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.825681167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785942	2539291	2543670	275859	280084	SPCC757.10	SPAPB1E7.06c	vph2	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515560706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785943	2539291	2541371	275859	277882	SPCC757.10	SPBP4H10.17c	vph2	SPBP4H10.17c	-	mrps2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.381194123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785944	2539291	2539108	275859	275680	SPCC757.10	SPCC1223.02	vph2	nmt1	-	thi3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.609760828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785945	2539291	2540779	275859	277298	SPCC757.10	SPBC19F8.06c	vph2	meu22	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.502860767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785946	2539291	2542915	275859	279357	SPCC757.10	SPAC6C3.06c	vph2	SPAC6C3.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931664597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785947	2539291	2539925	275859	276469	SPCC757.10	SPBC16H5.13	vph2	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.951697899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785948	2539291	2539030	275859	275603	SPCC757.10	SPCP1E11.02	vph2	ppk38	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.502241343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785949	2539291	2540800	275859	277319	SPCC757.10	SPBC409.20c	vph2	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.612187071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785950	2539291	2540881	275859	277398	SPCC757.10	SPBC577.14c	vph2	spa1	-	spa	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.711188416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785951	2539291	2540998	275859	277514	SPCC757.10	SPBC3D6.05	vph2	ptp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.31849615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785952	2539291	2540960	275859	277476	SPCC757.10	SPBC3D6.02	vph2	but2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.512703062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785953	2539291	2542075	275859	278552	SPCC757.10	SPAC27D7.06	vph2	etf1	-	SPAC27D7.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.763436779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785954	2539291	2541100	275859	277615	SPCC757.10	SPBC651.04	vph2	SPBC651.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.130865551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785955	2539291	2542472	275859	278933	SPCC757.10	SPAC9E9.13	vph2	wos2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.496464782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785956	2539291	2540725	275859	277248	SPCC757.10	SPBC215.14c	vph2	vps20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.69028896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785957	2539291	2538756	275859	275339	SPCC757.10	SPCC1795.10c	vph2	SPCC1795.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.265756331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785958	2539291	2541531	275859	278031	SPCC757.10	SPAC25A8.01c	vph2	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511547804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785959	2539291	2540699	275859	277223	SPCC757.10	SPBC800.08	vph2	gcd10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.177855093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785960	2539291	2540829	275859	277347	SPCC757.10	SPBC800.09	vph2	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.121808916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785961	2539291	2542418	275859	278881	SPCC757.10	SPAC1805.07c	vph2	dad2	-	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.465526637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785962	2539291	2540677	275859	277202	SPCC757.10	SPBC21B10.03c	vph2	ath1	-	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.009309476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785963	2539291	2539514	275859	276076	SPCC757.10	SPCC663.14c	vph2	trp663	-	SPCC663.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.437946223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785964	2539291	2543091	275859	279524	SPCC757.10	SPAC12G12.15	vph2	sif3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.789341036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785965	2539291	2542222	275859	278695	SPCC757.10	SPAC31G5.18c	vph2	sde2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.331757919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785966	2539291	2543228	275859	279656	SPCC757.10	SPAC6B12.04c	vph2	SPAC6B12.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.127030539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785967	2539291	2540569	275859	277096	SPCC757.10	SPBC660.17c	vph2	SPBC660.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.563494631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785968	2539291	2541404	275859	277913	SPCC757.10	SPBPB2B2.18	vph2	SPBPB2B2.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.119580104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785969	2539291	2541380	275859	277891	SPCC757.10	SPBPB2B2.13	vph2	gal1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.048790404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785970	2539291	2542635	275859	279089	SPCC757.10	SPAC24H6.09	vph2	gef1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.936103217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785971	2539291	2542416	275859	278880	SPCC757.10	SPAC589.03c	vph2	SPAC589.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577764031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785972	2539291	2540928	275859	277444	SPCC757.10	SPBC3E7.10	vph2	fma1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.43348212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785973	2539291	2540992	275859	277508	SPCC757.10	SPBC342.05	vph2	crb2	-	rhp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.070674645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785974	2539291	2540568	275859	277095	SPCC757.10	SPBC28F2.08c	vph2	SPBC28F2.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.561626401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785975	2539291	2539488	275859	276051	SPCC757.10	SPCC645.08c	vph2	snd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511470301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785976	2539291	2542262	275859	278731	SPCC757.10	SPAC17C9.10	vph2	stm1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091149143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785977	2539291	2539207	275859	275777	SPCC757.10	SPCC285.09c	vph2	cgs2	-	pde1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.740764456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785978	2539291	2540422	275859	276950	SPCC757.10	SPBC27.08c	vph2	sua1	-	SPBC28F2.01c|asp1|met3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.439849489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785979	2539291	2541244	275859	277758	SPCC757.10	SPBC8D2.02c	vph2	vps68	-	SPBC8D2.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.90686313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785980	2539291	2539702	275859	276255	SPCC757.10	SPBC1604.12	vph2	SPBC1604.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.698601534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785981	2539291	2541637	275859	278133	SPCC757.10	SPAC57A10.04	vph2	mug10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989521235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785982	2539291	3361117	275859	280193	SPCC757.10	SPCC663.17	vph2	wtf15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.174417287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785983	2539291	2543056	275859	279490	SPCC757.10	SPAC3A11.04	vph2	SPAC3A11.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.901812121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785984	2539291	2542116	275859	278592	SPCC757.10	SPAC1B3.15c	vph2	SPAC1B3.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.508593923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785985	2539291	2540270	275859	276801	SPCC757.10	SPBC2G2.02	vph2	syj1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871076074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785986	2539291	2540808	275859	277327	SPCC757.10	SPBC418.02	vph2	SPBC418.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569153761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785987	2539291	2541238	275859	277752	SPCC757.10	SPBC8E4.05c	vph2	SPBC8E4.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.557355515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785988	2539291	2542716	275859	279169	SPCC757.10	SPAC25H1.07	vph2	emc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867911957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785989	2539291	2543513	275859	279931	SPCC757.10	SPAC821.06	vph2	spn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389215607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785990	2539291	2539700	275859	276253	SPCC757.10	SPBC1685.15c	vph2	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.705612728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785991	2539291	2541709	275859	278204	SPCC757.10	SPAC3C7.02c	vph2	pil2	-	SPAC3C7.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.47898267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785992	2539291	2541129	275859	277644	SPCC757.10	SPBC713.11c	vph2	pmp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038925195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785993	2539291	2543384	275859	279806	SPCC757.10	SPAC637.06	vph2	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.633754459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785994	2539291	2540409	275859	276937	SPCC757.10	SPBC2D10.11c	vph2	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.233737818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785995	2539291	2540766	275859	277286	SPCC757.10	SPBC19C2.02	vph2	pmt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776713369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785996	2539291	2543684	275859	280098	SPCC757.10	SPAC4G8.03c	vph2	SPAC4G8.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.557977927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785997	2539291	2542159	275859	278635	SPCC757.10	SPAC1834.09	vph2	mug51	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924532794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785998	2539291	2538854	275859	275435	SPCC757.10	SPCP1E11.05c	vph2	are2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.182733499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
785999	2539291	2543471	275859	279891	SPCC757.10	SPAC513.07	vph2	SPAC513.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.563566403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786000	2539291	2540828	275859	277346	SPCC757.10	SPBC4B4.06	vph2	vps25	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.14464647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786001	2539291	2540496	275859	277024	SPCC757.10	SPBC800.11	vph2	SPBC800.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812404909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786002	2539291	2543587	275859	280002	SPCC757.10	SPAC4D7.02c	vph2	SPAC4D7.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454447995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786003	2539291	2541003	275859	277518	SPCC757.10	SPBC3E7.16c	vph2	leu3	-	SPBC4F6.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392372518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786004	2539291	2539743	275859	276295	SPCC757.10	SPBC16A3.08c	vph2	oga1	-	SPBC16A3.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.414683184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786005	2539291	2542104	275859	278580	SPCC757.10	SPAC869.02c	vph2	SPAC869.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.894227636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786006	2539291	2541334	275859	277845	SPCC757.10	SPBP4H10.18c	vph2	SPBP4H10.18c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574146929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786007	2539291	2539976	275859	276520	SPCC757.10	SPBC1683.07	vph2	mal1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873822552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786008	2539291	2543644	275859	280058	SPCC757.10	SPAPB1A10.03	vph2	nxt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.714467699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786009	2539291	2542111	275859	278587	SPCC757.10	SPAC1687.14c	vph2	SPAC1687.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.559192597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786010	2539291	2540372	275859	276901	SPCC757.10	SPBC31F10.03	vph2	SPBC31F10.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913376641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786011	2539291	2540383	275859	276912	SPCC757.10	SPBC31E1.02c	vph2	pmr1	-	cps5|pgak2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.240804135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786012	2539291	2540859	275859	277376	SPCC757.10	SPBC4C3.09	vph2	SPBC4C3.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04601439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786013	2539291	2543100	275859	279532	SPCC757.10	SPAC12B10.14c	vph2	tea5	-	ppk2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.048865352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786014	2539291	2542943	275859	279384	SPCC757.10	SPBC1348.03	vph2	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.208075106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786015	2539291	2543472	275859	279892	SPCC757.10	SPAC959.04c	vph2	omh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.227099799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786016	2539291	2542561	275859	279017	SPCC757.10	SPAC31G5.17c	vph2	rps1001	-	rps10-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.914983708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786017	2539291	2541062	275859	277577	SPCC757.10	SPBC660.11	vph2	tcg1	-	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.087613443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786018	2539291	2541236	275859	277750	SPCC757.10	SPBC887.11	vph2	pus2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382252958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786019	2539291	2540320	275859	276850	SPCC757.10	SPBC3D6.04c	vph2	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.960183384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786020	2539291	2540734	275859	277257	SPCC757.10	SPBC19G7.09	vph2	ulp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.060221344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786021	2539291	2542836	275859	279282	SPCC757.10	SPAC13G7.06	vph2	met16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.447458297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786022	2539291	2542571	275859	279027	SPCC757.10	SPAC589.02c	vph2	med13	-	spTrap240|srb9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.460469891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786023	2541608	2542518	278105	278976	SPAC2F3.16	SPAC1B3.16c	SPAC2F3.16	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.912547323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786024	2541608	2540995	278105	277511	SPAC2F3.16	SPBC337.16	SPAC2F3.16	cho1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575507183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786025	2541608	2540363	278105	276892	SPAC2F3.16	SPBC2F12.09c	SPAC2F3.16	atf21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385534529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786026	2541608	2542976	278105	279414	SPAC2F3.16	SPAC9E9.09c	SPAC2F3.16	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.275413016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786027	2541608	2542439	278105	278901	SPAC2F3.16	SPAC17A5.08	SPAC2F3.16	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.386146933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786028	2541608	2540342	278105	276871	SPAC2F3.16	SPBC2G2.01c	SPAC2F3.16	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773690206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786029	2541608	2540930	278105	277446	SPAC2F3.16	SPBC354.10	SPAC2F3.16	def1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.342211898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786030	2541608	2542516	278105	278974	SPAC2F3.16	SPAC2F7.04	SPAC2F3.16	pmc2	-	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.683418679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786031	2541608	2542075	278105	278552	SPAC2F3.16	SPAC27D7.06	SPAC2F3.16	etf1	-	SPAC27D7.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582281771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786032	2543379	2541701	279801	278197	SPAC821.09	SPAC1296.03c	eng1	sxa2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.435545859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786033	2539700	2542207	276253	278682	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC17H9.10c	klp6	ddb1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.170092662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786034	2539700	2541512	276253	278013	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC11E3.08c	klp6	nse6	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.906429097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786035	2539700	2541818	276253	278309	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC11G7.02	klp6	pub1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.262581661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786036	2539700	2542358	276253	278823	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC1782.09c	klp6	clp1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.059096784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786037	2539700	2542378	276253	278842	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC1805.04	klp6	nup132	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.485555541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786038	2539700	2543524	276253	279942	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC4D7.07c	klp6	csi2	SPBC649.01c|sot2	SPAC4D7.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.972089801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786039	2539700	2542237	276253	278709	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC19E9.02	klp6	fin1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.00913297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786040	2539700	3361561	276253	280637	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC11E3.01c	klp6	swr1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.423775426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786041	2539700	2541856	276253	278347	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC23H3.08c	klp6	bub3	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.49522468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786042	2539700	2540161	276253	276696	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC13E7.03c	klp6	SPBC13E7.03c	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505728527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786043	2539700	2541633	276253	278129	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC664.01c	klp6	swi6	SPBC649.01c|sot2	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.28386406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786044	2539700	2539309	276253	275876	SPBC1685.15c	SPCC4G3.19	klp6	alp16	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.242529666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786045	2539700	2540664	276253	277189	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC215.02	klp6	bob1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.287532725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786046	2539700	2541200	276253	277714	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC8D2.03c	klp6	hhf2	SPBC649.01c|sot2	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514411894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786047	2539700	2542468	276253	278929	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC1D4.09c	klp6	rtf2	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517870002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786048	2539700	2541208	276253	277722	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC887.04c	klp6	lub1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980870466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786049	2539700	2538847	276253	275428	SPBC1685.15c	SPCC594.06c	klp6	SPCC594.06c	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.740794134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786050	2539700	2541026	276253	277541	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC337.09	klp6	erg28	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441343772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786051	2539700	2540425	276253	276953	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC27.06c	klp6	mgr2	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386279108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786052	2539700	2542318	276253	278784	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC16C9.05	klp6	cph1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.83007968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786053	2539700	2541580	276253	278077	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC1687.05	klp6	pli1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.285320565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786054	2539700	2543563	276253	279979	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC664.02c	klp6	arp8	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.300411661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786055	2539700	2543078	276253	279511	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC31A2.15c	klp6	dcc1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.602672287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786056	2539700	2542981	276253	279419	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC824.02	klp6	bst1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446753606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786057	2539700	2539023	276253	275596	SPBC1685.15c	SPCC594.05c	klp6	spf1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.501239333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786058	2539700	2542268	276253	278737	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC17A5.07c	klp6	ulp2	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.422346333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786059	2539700	2539467	276253	276030	SPBC1685.15c	SPCC417.07c	klp6	mto1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.11430456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786060	2539700	2542311	276253	278777	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC16A10.05c	klp6	dad1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.322507358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786061	2539700	2543514	276253	279932	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC4D7.03	klp6	pop2	SPBC649.01c|sot2	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.058905318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786062	2539700	2541776	276253	278270	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC23H3.05c	klp6	swd1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.31502435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786063	2539700	2543144	276253	279576	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC3F10.05c	klp6	mug113	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321108477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786064	2539700	2540352	276253	276881	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC215.03c	klp6	csn1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.307282304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786065	2539700	2540673	276253	277198	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC1D7.03	klp6	mug80	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.211875528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786066	2539700	2541096	276253	277611	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC725.10	klp6	SPBC725.10	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989935161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786067	2539700	2539689	276253	276244	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC1861.03	klp6	mak10	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573447584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786068	2539700	2539667	276253	276222	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC13G1.08c	klp6	ash2	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.698644867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786069	2539700	2542126	276253	278602	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC1B3.05	klp6	not3	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.659046712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786070	2539700	2543244	276253	279672	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC6B12.06c	klp6	rrg9	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568751181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786071	2539700	2540751	276253	277273	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC20F10.10	klp6	psl1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.214628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786072	2539700	2542976	276253	279414	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC9E9.09c	klp6	atd1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.26037412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786073	2539700	2539232	276253	275802	SPBC1685.15c	SPCC1223.04c	klp6	set11	SPBC649.01c|sot2	mug76	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.843107818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786074	2539700	2543378	276253	279800	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC3H8.07c	klp6	pac10	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.74005968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786075	2539700	5802861	276253	857999	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC1D4.01	klp6	tls1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573483064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786076	2539700	2543443	276253	279863	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC3H1.12c	klp6	snt2	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516536987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786077	2539700	2541708	276253	278203	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC31A2.02	klp6	trm112	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384422974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786078	2539700	2541959	276253	278446	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC23C4.03	klp6	hrk1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.231153651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786079	2539700	2540967	276253	277483	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC36B7.08c	klp6	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.076580034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786080	2539700	2541614	276253	278111	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC29A4.20	klp6	elp3	SPBC649.01c|sot2	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.251172074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786081	2539700	2538690	276253	275275	SPBC1685.15c	SPCC1393.05	klp6	ers1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.270043703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786082	2539700	2540229	276253	276761	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC31F10.15c	klp6	atp15	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.198020166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786083	2539700	2539527	276253	276089	SPBC1685.15c	SPCC338.16	klp6	pof3	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.546534125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786084	2539700	3361520	276253	280596	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC1610.02c	klp6	SPAC1610.02c	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.98848295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786085	2539700	2541628	276253	278124	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC110.02	klp6	pds5	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.081911867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786086	2539700	2539763	276253	276314	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC1861.05	klp6	SPBC1861.05	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05429171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786087	2539700	2539160	276253	275732	SPBC1685.15c	SPCC18.17c	klp6	SPCC18.17c	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511296234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786088	2539700	2538762	276253	275345	SPBC1685.15c	SPCC306.04c	klp6	set1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.825778411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786089	2539700	2541909	276253	278399	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC227.01c	klp6	erd1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.141618265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786090	2539700	2539925	276253	276469	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC16H5.13	klp6	SPBC16H5.13	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392359727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786091	2539700	2540531	276253	277059	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC23E6.08	klp6	sat1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189235552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786092	2539700	2541531	276253	278031	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC25A8.01c	klp6	fft3	SPBC649.01c|sot2	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.833648184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786093	2539700	2542418	276253	278881	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC1805.07c	klp6	dad2	SPBC649.01c|sot2	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.789435666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786094	2539700	2540927	276253	277443	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC365.06	klp6	pmt3	SPBC649.01c|sot2	smt3|ubl2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706077189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786095	2539700	2540278	276253	276809	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC1A4.04	klp6	SPBC1A4.04	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931520618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786096	2539700	2539189	276253	275760	SPBC1685.15c	SPCC1682.16	klp6	rpt4	SPBC649.01c|sot2	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.336415746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786097	2539700	2541675	276253	278171	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC22F8.12c	klp6	shf1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510809397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786098	2539700	2543387	276253	279809	SPBC1685.15c	SPAPB1E7.02c	klp6	mcl1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.900879436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786099	2539700	2542424	276253	278886	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC1805.14	klp6	SPAC1805.14	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.196744006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786100	2539700	2543372	276253	279794	SPBC1685.15c	SPAPB1A10.09	klp6	ase1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.306953264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786101	2539700	2540309	276253	276839	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC21B10.13c	klp6	yox1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503979509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786102	2539700	2541297	276253	277809	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC9B6.07	klp6	nop52	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.557184232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786103	2539700	2540320	276253	276850	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC3D6.04c	klp6	mad1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.255149902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786104	2539700	2540787	276253	277306	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC1921.07c	klp6	sgf29	SPBC649.01c|sot2	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.13045606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786105	2539700	2539001	276253	275575	SPBC1685.15c	SPCC1494.08c	klp6	SPCC1494.08c	SPBC649.01c|sot2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452183947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786106	2540373	2540415	276902	276943	SPBC2G2.05	SPBC30B4.06c	rpl1603	SPBC30B4.06c	rpl16c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.98066726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786107	2540373	2542007	276902	278490	SPBC2G2.05	SPAC20H4.07	rpl1603	rad57	rpl16c	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.459351538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786108	2540373	2542716	276902	279169	SPBC2G2.05	SPAC25H1.07	rpl1603	emc1	rpl16c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931652454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786109	2540373	2543387	276902	279809	SPBC2G2.05	SPAPB1E7.02c	rpl1603	mcl1	rpl16c	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.184547873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786110	2539959	2543529	276503	279947	SPBC1703.11	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC1703.11	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.130149814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786111	2539959	2543064	276503	279497	SPBC1703.11	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC1703.11	hrp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.890944029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786112	2539959	2542318	276503	278784	SPBC1703.11	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC1703.11	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.121555942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786113	2539959	2542253	276503	278723	SPBC1703.11	SPAC17H9.04c	SPBC1703.11	SPAC17H9.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865285509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786114	2539959	2542311	276503	278777	SPBC1703.11	SPAC16A10.05c	SPBC1703.11	dad1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.836888008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786115	2539959	2540229	276503	276761	SPBC1703.11	SPBC31F10.15c	SPBC1703.11	atp15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.669328568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786116	2539959	2538889	276503	275467	SPBC1703.11	SPCC1393.07c	SPBC1703.11	mug4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874281434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786117	2539959	2540064	276503	276602	SPBC1703.11	SPBC1718.02	SPBC1703.11	hop1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.050830231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786118	2539959	2540270	276503	276801	SPBC1703.11	SPBC2G2.02	SPBC1703.11	syj1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.710845243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786119	2539959	2541478	276503	277980	SPBC1703.11	SPAC2F7.17	SPBC1703.11	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820011403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786120	2542195	2541051	278670	277566	SPAC1834.07	SPBC3E7.08c	klp3	rad13	krp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.271495348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786121	2542195	2541249	278670	277763	SPAC1834.07	SPBC947.01	klp3	alf1	krp1	SPBC947.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.935711043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786122	2542195	2542659	278670	279112	SPAC1834.07	SPAC25B8.08	klp3	SPAC25B8.08	krp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.337438998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786123	2542195	2539715	278670	276268	SPAC1834.07	SPBC1778.09	klp3	SPBC1778.09	krp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642483845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786124	2542195	2542453	278670	278914	SPAC1834.07	SPAC186.01	klp3	pfl9	krp1	SPAC186.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.310465652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786125	2542195	2538717	278670	275301	SPAC1834.07	SPCC1235.02	klp3	bio2	krp1	SPCC320.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.126837843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786126	2542195	2539246	278670	275816	SPAC1834.07	SPCC18.13	klp3	SPCC18.13	krp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.552010113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786127	2542195	2543136	278670	279568	SPAC1834.07	SPBC1348.07	klp3	SPBC1348.07	krp1	SPAC1348.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095986889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786128	2542195	2538714	278670	275298	SPAC1834.07	SPCC330.11	klp3	btb1	krp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573398165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786129	2542195	2542574	278670	279030	SPAC1834.07	SPAC186.05c	klp3	SPAC186.05c	krp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.559442631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786130	2540664	2541562	277189	278061	SPBC215.02	SPAC24B11.05	bob1	SPAC24B11.05	gim5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.56868577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786131	2540664	2543617	277189	280031	SPBC215.02	SPAC4A8.10	bob1	SPAC4A8.10	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.334128229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786132	2540664	2542787	277189	279236	SPBC215.02	SPAC9G1.08c	bob1	SPAC9G1.08c	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094360685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786133	2540664	2542378	277189	278842	SPBC215.02	SPAC1805.04	bob1	nup132	gim5	Nup133b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.121695569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786134	2540664	2540528	277189	277056	SPBC215.02	SPBC18H10.04c	bob1	sce3	gim5	tif48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.080797842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786135	2540664	2542237	277189	278709	SPBC215.02	SPAC19E9.02	bob1	fin1	gim5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.819704593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786136	2540664	2539930	277189	276474	SPBC215.02	SPBC1198.11c	bob1	reb1	gim5	SPBC660.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.117708505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786137	2540664	2540347	277189	276876	SPBC215.02	SPBC30B4.08	bob1	eri1	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039758109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786138	2540664	2540686	277189	277211	SPBC215.02	SPBC21D10.10	bob1	bdc1	gim5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390497493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786139	2540664	2539309	277189	275876	SPBC215.02	SPCC4G3.19	bob1	alp16	gim5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.835168199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786140	2540664	2540560	277189	277087	SPBC215.02	SPBC2D10.14c	bob1	myo51	gim5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.473990542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786141	2540664	2542107	277189	278583	SPBC215.02	SPAC30.01c	bob1	sec72	gim5	sec7b|sec702	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820693846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786142	2540664	2542273	277189	278742	SPBC215.02	SPAC17H9.13c	bob1	SPAC17H9.13c	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.894568334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786143	2540664	2538775	277189	275357	SPBC215.02	SPCC23B6.05c	bob1	ssb3	gim5	rpa3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.893941595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786144	2540664	2541500	277189	278002	SPBC215.02	SPAC227.18	bob1	lys3	gim5	SPAC2F7.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867476406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786145	2540664	2542816	277189	279263	SPBC215.02	SPAC4G8.11c	bob1	atp10	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.620529605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786146	2540664	2541026	277189	277541	SPBC215.02	SPBC337.09	bob1	erg28	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152649203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786147	2540664	2540220	277189	276753	SPBC215.02	SPBC337.03	bob1	rhn1	gim5	SPBC337.03|iss4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.842337933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786148	2540664	2541669	277189	278165	SPBC215.02	SPAC22G7.07c	bob1	ime4	gim5	SPAC22G7.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.464829722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786149	2540664	2540425	277189	276953	SPBC215.02	SPBC27.06c	bob1	mgr2	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874936402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786150	2540664	2541424	277189	277929	SPBC215.02	SPAC23G3.04	bob1	ies4	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044950673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786151	2540664	2542318	277189	278784	SPBC215.02	SPAC16C9.05	bob1	cph1	gim5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.47152648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786152	2540664	2541643	277189	278139	SPBC215.02	SPAC14C4.13	bob1	rad17	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.072933767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786153	2540664	2541923	277189	278411	SPBC215.02	SPAC23C4.09c	bob1	SPAC23C4.09c	gim5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.580871396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786154	2540664	2543641	277189	280055	SPBC215.02	SPAC3H5.08c	bob1	SPAC3H5.08c	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.202235075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786155	2540664	2543563	277189	279979	SPBC215.02	SPAC664.02c	bob1	arp8	gim5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.480203045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786156	2540664	2543584	277189	279999	SPBC215.02	SPAPB1E7.11c	bob1	SPAPB1E7.11c	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.871457594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786157	2540664	2539381	277189	275947	SPBC215.02	SPCC1739.10	bob1	mug33	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098353807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786158	2540664	2538906	277189	275483	SPBC215.02	SPCC1259.03	bob1	rpa12	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.298923322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786159	2540664	2541834	277189	278325	SPBC215.02	SPAC824.08	bob1	gda1	gim5	gdp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.800725611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786160	2540664	2541926	277189	278414	SPBC215.02	SPAC222.14c	bob1	SPAC222.14c	gim5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.171529141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786161	2540664	2542268	277189	278737	SPBC215.02	SPAC17A5.07c	bob1	ulp2	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.662096789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786162	2540664	2542036	277189	278518	SPBC215.02	SPAC23A1.19c	bob1	hrq1	gim5	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.900445787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786163	2540664	2542260	277189	278729	SPBC215.02	SPAC1F12.05	bob1	SPAC1F12.05	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.560636021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786164	2540664	2542311	277189	278777	SPBC215.02	SPAC16A10.05c	bob1	dad1	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.244028407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786165	2540664	2542394	277189	278858	SPBC215.02	SPAC31G5.12c	bob1	maf1	gim5	n150	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199698019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786166	2540664	2543514	277189	279932	SPBC215.02	SPAC4D7.03	bob1	pop2	gim5	sud1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.890840856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786167	2540664	2540797	277189	277316	SPBC215.02	SPBC18H10.11c	bob1	ppr2	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986804467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786168	2540664	2541776	277189	278270	SPBC215.02	SPAC23H3.05c	bob1	swd1	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200109392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786169	2540664	2541160	277189	277675	SPBC215.02	SPBC725.09c	bob1	hob3	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.711462638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786170	2540664	2539733	277189	276285	SPBC215.02	SPBC16E9.12c	bob1	pab2	gim5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.473301966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786171	2540664	2541496	277189	277998	SPBC215.02	SPAC23D3.09	bob1	arp42	gim5	arp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.081093279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786172	2540664	2540194	277189	276727	SPBC215.02	SPBC1709.09	bob1	rrf1	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925222203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786173	2540664	2542007	277189	278490	SPBC215.02	SPAC20H4.07	bob1	rad57	gim5	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035434931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786174	2540664	2543244	277189	279672	SPBC215.02	SPAC6B12.06c	bob1	rrg9	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.871194966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786175	2540664	2540836	277189	277354	SPBC215.02	SPBC18H10.19	bob1	vps38	gim5	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707858175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786176	2540664	2543378	277189	279800	SPBC215.02	SPAC3H8.07c	bob1	pac10	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.837879076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786177	2540664	2541900	277189	278390	SPBC215.02	SPAC23H4.17c	bob1	srb10	gim5	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.231045752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786178	2540664	2542549	277189	279006	SPBC215.02	SPAC19A8.11c	bob1	SPAC19A8.11c	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043267607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786179	2540664	2539408	277189	275973	SPBC215.02	SPCC576.12c	bob1	mhf2	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.330293455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786180	2540664	2541464	277189	277966	SPBC215.02	SPAC222.08c	bob1	SPAC222.08c	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152107191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786181	2540664	2539847	277189	276395	SPBC215.02	SPBC530.14c	bob1	dsk1	gim5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.113007326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786182	2540664	2540850	277189	277367	SPBC215.02	SPBC18A7.02c	bob1	SPBC18A7.02c	gim5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324561038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786183	2540664	2541054	277189	277569	SPBC215.02	SPBC3B8.08	bob1	SPBC3B8.08	gim5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.990891521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786184	2540664	2543254	277189	279682	SPBC215.02	SPAC1006.03c	bob1	red1	gim5	iss3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382516446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786185	2540664	2542781	277189	279230	SPBC215.02	SPAC57A10.12c	bob1	ura3	gim5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767880103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786186	2540664	2543515	277189	279933	SPBC215.02	SPAC4F10.14c	bob1	btf3	gim5	btt1|egd1|nac2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037196083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786187	2540664	2541963	277189	278449	SPBC215.02	SPAC21E11.04	bob1	aca1	gim5	ppr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.332578681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786188	2540664	2541144	277189	277659	SPBC215.02	SPBC685.06	bob1	rps001	gim5	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.333909172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786189	2540664	2541713	277189	278208	SPBC215.02	SPAC3A12.12	bob1	atp11	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.246104762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786190	2540664	2539908	277189	276454	SPBC215.02	SPBC13E7.06	bob1	msd1	gim5	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.03212223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786191	2540664	2540910	277189	277426	SPBC215.02	SPBC577.02	bob1	rpl3801	gim5	rpl38-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.569123378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786192	2540664	2539160	277189	275732	SPBC215.02	SPCC18.17c	bob1	SPCC18.17c	gim5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443671959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786193	2540664	2541786	277189	278278	SPBC215.02	SPAC22F3.08c	bob1	rok1	gim5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.048813197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786194	2540664	2538762	277189	275345	SPBC215.02	SPCC306.04c	bob1	set1	gim5	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820920358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786195	2540664	2543619	277189	280033	SPBC215.02	SPAC4F10.04	bob1	ypa1	gim5	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.84349434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786196	2540664	2541175	277189	277689	SPBC215.02	SPBC839.13c	bob1	rpl1601	gim5	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037742977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786197	2540664	2540498	277189	277026	SPBC215.02	SPBC27.02c	bob1	ask1	gim5	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.622851553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786198	2540664	2539925	277189	276469	SPBC215.02	SPBC16H5.13	bob1	SPBC16H5.13	gim5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.864235244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786199	2540664	2542515	277189	278973	SPBC215.02	SPAC1952.09c	bob1	SPAC1952.09c	gim5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330110365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786200	2540664	2543304	277189	279728	SPBC215.02	SPAC6B12.12	bob1	tom70	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.645338065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786201	2540664	2542541	277189	278998	SPBC215.02	SPAC1B3.03c	bob1	wis2	gim5	cyp5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984885719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786202	2540664	2543096	277189	279528	SPBC215.02	SPAC977.05c	bob1	SPAC977.05c	gim5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.381899298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786203	2540664	2541432	277189	277937	SPBC215.02	SPAC1F5.05c	bob1	mso1	gim5	SPAC1F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.031141612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786204	2540664	2541531	277189	278031	SPBC215.02	SPAC25A8.01c	bob1	fft3	gim5	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.126895768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786205	2540664	2539013	277189	275586	SPBC215.02	SPCC364.03	bob1	rpl1702	gim5	rpl17|rpl17-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045279369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786206	2540664	2542418	277189	278881	SPBC215.02	SPAC1805.07c	bob1	dad2	gim5	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.988769244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786207	2540664	2541229	277189	277743	SPBC215.02	SPBC839.05c	bob1	rps1701	gim5	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.76850329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786208	2540664	2543228	277189	279656	SPBC215.02	SPAC6B12.04c	bob1	SPAC6B12.04c	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043074895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786209	2540664	2542826	277189	279273	SPBC215.02	SPAC13G6.09	bob1	SPAC13G6.09	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.414392803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786210	2540664	2541115	277189	277630	SPBC215.02	SPBC660.07	bob1	ntp1	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.157457825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786211	2540664	2543633	277189	280047	SPBC215.02	SPAC3H8.05c	bob1	mms1	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195762418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786212	2540664	2539375	277189	275941	SPBC215.02	SPCC4G3.11	bob1	mug154	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.506398448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786213	2540664	2543380	277189	279802	SPBC215.02	SPAC4G9.16c	bob1	rpl901	gim5	rpl9-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.46046321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786214	2540664	2542716	277189	279169	SPBC215.02	SPAC25H1.07	bob1	emc1	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992680069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786215	2540664	2539700	277189	276253	SPBC215.02	SPBC1685.15c	bob1	klp6	gim5	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.287532725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786216	2540664	2543387	277189	279809	SPBC215.02	SPAPB1E7.02c	bob1	mcl1	gim5	slr3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.548355719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786217	2540664	2540173	277189	276706	SPBC215.02	SPBC106.13	bob1	SPBC106.13	gim5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779323412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786218	2540664	2541491	277189	277993	SPBC215.02	SPAC2C4.16c	bob1	rps801	gim5	rps8|rps8-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.773920315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786219	2540664	2543372	277189	279794	SPBC215.02	SPAPB1A10.09	bob1	ase1	gim5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.056918428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786220	2540664	2543333	277189	279756	SPBC215.02	SPAC694.02	bob1	SPAC694.02	gim5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039942474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786221	2540664	2538947	277189	275521	SPBC215.02	SPCC1682.12c	bob1	ubp16	gim5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382261901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786222	2540664	2543624	277189	280038	SPBC215.02	SPAC4D7.06c	bob1	SPAC4D7.06c	gim5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509310351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786223	2540664	3361512	277189	280588	SPBC215.02	SPAC3C7.01c	bob1	sac12	gim5	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.305136126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786224	2542298	2542107	278765	278583	SPAC29A4.02c	SPAC30.01c	SPAC29A4.02c	sec72	tef3	sec7b|sec702	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391768691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786225	2542298	2540979	278765	277495	SPAC29A4.02c	SPBC3H7.10	SPAC29A4.02c	elp6	tef3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517624706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786226	2542298	2542569	278765	279025	SPAC29A4.02c	SPAC186.08c	SPAC29A4.02c	SPAC186.08c	tef3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582747336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786227	2542298	2540425	278765	276953	SPAC29A4.02c	SPBC27.06c	SPAC29A4.02c	mgr2	tef3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984448106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786228	2542298	2540673	278765	277198	SPAC29A4.02c	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC29A4.02c	mug80	tef3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.894343712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786229	2542298	2542469	278765	278930	SPAC29A4.02c	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC29A4.02c	erg5	tef3	cyp61	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.894672861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786230	2542298	2540086	278765	276624	SPAC29A4.02c	SPBC16H5.12c	SPAC29A4.02c	SPBC16H5.12c	tef3	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323247543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786231	2542298	2540930	278765	277446	SPAC29A4.02c	SPBC354.10	SPAC29A4.02c	def1	tef3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320123936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786232	2542298	2543193	278765	279622	SPAC29A4.02c	SPAC3F10.11c	SPAC29A4.02c	abc2	tef3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928847789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786233	2542298	2541017	278765	277532	SPAC29A4.02c	SPBC36.07	SPAC29A4.02c	elp1	tef3	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.501802364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786234	2542298	2543304	278765	279728	SPAC29A4.02c	SPAC6B12.12	SPAC29A4.02c	tom70	tef3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933353575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786235	2542298	2540531	278765	277059	SPAC29A4.02c	SPBC23E6.08	SPAC29A4.02c	sat1	tef3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322383236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786236	2542298	2541531	278765	278031	SPAC29A4.02c	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC29A4.02c	fft3	tef3	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.937203705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786237	2542298	2543219	278765	279647	SPAC29A4.02c	SPAC56F8.09	SPAC29A4.02c	rrp8	tef3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.681298331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786238	2542298	2542795	278765	279243	SPAC29A4.02c	SPAC9G1.05	SPAC29A4.02c	aip1	tef3	SPAC9G1.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451133906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786239	2541800	2542895	278291	279339	SPAC732.02c	SPAC13G6.10c	SPAC732.02c	asl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510313857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786240	2541800	2540913	278291	277429	SPAC732.02c	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC732.02c	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.778150906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786241	2541800	2539939	278291	276483	SPAC732.02c	SPBC11G11.01	SPAC732.02c	fis1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505238438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786242	2541800	2542701	278291	279154	SPAC732.02c	SPAC26H5.05	SPAC732.02c	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321272787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786243	2541800	2538922	278291	275499	SPAC732.02c	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC732.02c	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.018919935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786244	2541800	2538806	278291	275387	SPAC732.02c	SPCC1840.09	SPAC732.02c	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.13183957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786245	2541800	2543590	278291	280005	SPAC732.02c	SPAC4C5.03	SPAC732.02c	SPAC4C5.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570682065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786246	2541800	2543453	278291	279873	SPAC732.02c	SPAC3G9.03	SPAC732.02c	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978338865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786247	2541800	2539117	278291	275689	SPAC732.02c	SPCC74.06	SPAC732.02c	mak3	-	phk2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.434471722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786248	2541800	2542318	278291	278784	SPAC732.02c	SPAC16C9.05	SPAC732.02c	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.915189754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786249	2541800	2542698	278291	279151	SPAC732.02c	SPAC26H5.09c	SPAC732.02c	SPAC26H5.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.092643311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786250	2541800	2541004	278291	277519	SPAC732.02c	SPBC3F6.01c	SPAC732.02c	SPBC3F6.01c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989269582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786251	2541800	2540023	278291	276567	SPAC732.02c	SPBC11C11.10	SPAC732.02c	SPBC11C11.10	-	SPBC3B8.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.30029337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786252	2541800	2543078	278291	279511	SPAC732.02c	SPAC31A2.15c	SPAC732.02c	dcc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.521296729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786253	2541800	2540893	278291	277409	SPAC732.02c	SPBC543.10	SPAC732.02c	get1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510115964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786254	2541800	2540797	278291	277316	SPAC732.02c	SPBC18H10.11c	SPAC732.02c	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.568005474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786255	2541800	2543412	278291	279834	SPAC732.02c	SPAC637.07	SPAC732.02c	moe1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.343746481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786256	2541800	2542464	278291	278925	SPAC732.02c	SPAC1A6.09c	SPAC732.02c	lag1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512593045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786257	2541800	2541166	278291	277681	SPAC732.02c	SPBC725.15	SPAC732.02c	ura5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.934512377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786258	2541800	2540086	278291	276624	SPAC732.02c	SPBC16H5.12c	SPAC732.02c	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.327199933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786259	2541800	2538774	278291	275356	SPAC732.02c	SPCC162.06c	SPAC732.02c	SPCC162.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.061477875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786260	2541800	2542710	278291	279163	SPAC732.02c	SPAC750.08c	SPAC732.02c	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324156736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786261	2541800	2542597	278291	279051	SPAC732.02c	SPAP8A3.07c	SPAC732.02c	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381006293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786262	2541800	2540946	278291	277462	SPAC732.02c	SPBC36.04	SPAC732.02c	cys11	-	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.020895504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786263	2541800	2542283	278291	278751	SPAC732.02c	SPAC27F1.08	SPAC732.02c	pdt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.20433752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786264	2541800	2539490	278291	276053	SPAC732.02c	SPCC364.07	SPAC732.02c	ser3	-	SPCC364.07|SPCC4G3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642358922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786265	2541800	2542407	278291	278871	SPAC732.02c	SPAC19B12.06c	SPAC732.02c	SPAC19B12.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.660715807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786266	2541800	2539453	278291	276016	SPAC732.02c	SPCPB1C11.03	SPAC732.02c	SPCPB1C11.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582062803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786267	2541800	2542286	278291	278754	SPAC732.02c	SPAC1786.01c	SPAC732.02c	ptl2	-	SPAC1786.01c|SPAC31G5.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.299528868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786268	2541800	2541175	278291	277689	SPAC732.02c	SPBC839.13c	SPAC732.02c	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.663179114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786269	2541800	2539896	278291	276442	SPAC732.02c	SPBC146.02	SPAC732.02c	SPBC146.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.568904683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786270	2541800	2540498	278291	277026	SPAC732.02c	SPBC27.02c	SPAC732.02c	ask1	-	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.257095566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786271	2541800	2539346	278291	275912	SPAC732.02c	SPCC569.04	SPAC732.02c	SPCC569.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.802533593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786272	2541800	2540936	278291	277452	SPAC732.02c	SPBC800.05c	SPAC732.02c	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874124042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786273	2541800	2542059	278291	278537	SPAC732.02c	SPAC328.06	SPAC732.02c	ubp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.162939578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786274	2541800	2541806	278291	278297	SPAC732.02c	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC732.02c	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.590572987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786275	2541800	2543387	278291	279809	SPAC732.02c	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC732.02c	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.521807006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786276	2541800	2540383	278291	276912	SPAC732.02c	SPBC31E1.02c	SPAC732.02c	pmr1	-	cps5|pgak2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.869214174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786277	2541800	2540787	278291	277306	SPAC732.02c	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC732.02c	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.859272194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786278	2541800	2538730	278291	275314	SPAC732.02c	SPCC31H12.02c	SPAC732.02c	mug73	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.609070594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786279	2542558	2538939	279014	275514	SPAC1952.07	SPCC1672.04c	rad1	SPCC1672.04c	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.835138038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786280	2542558	2542207	279014	278682	SPAC1952.07	SPAC17H9.10c	rad1	ddb1	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913681533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786281	2542558	2542577	279014	279033	SPAC1952.07	SPAC19G12.15c	rad1	tpp1	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189688325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786282	2542558	2541135	279014	277650	SPAC1952.07	SPBC839.03c	rad1	SPBC839.03c	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.776497059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786283	2542558	2541117	279014	277632	SPAC1952.07	SPBC646.13	rad1	sds23	rad19	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.986477278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786284	2542558	2541051	279014	277566	SPAC1952.07	SPBC3E7.08c	rad1	rad13	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.622847528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786285	2542558	2541188	279014	277702	SPAC1952.07	SPBC83.16c	rad1	SPBC83.16c	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506677769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786286	2542558	2538775	279014	275357	SPAC1952.07	SPCC23B6.05c	rad1	ssb3	rad19	rpa3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.587772304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786287	2542558	2540945	279014	277461	SPAC1952.07	SPBC342.06c	rad1	rtt109	rad19	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.93536355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786288	2542558	2541026	279014	277541	SPAC1952.07	SPBC337.09	rad1	erg28	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641934025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786289	2542558	2543685	279014	280099	SPAC1952.07	SPAC3C7.03c	rad1	rad55	rad19	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.543475982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786290	2542558	2543641	279014	280055	SPAC1952.07	SPAC3H5.08c	rad1	SPAC3H5.08c	rad19	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98750169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786291	2542558	2543319	279014	279743	SPAC1952.07	SPAC6B12.09	rad1	trm10	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.93821013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786292	2542558	2542036	279014	278518	SPAC1952.07	SPAC23A1.19c	rad1	hrq1	rad19	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.709435015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786293	2542558	2538821	279014	275402	SPAC1952.07	SPCC584.01c	rad1	SPCC584.01c	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.846621385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786294	2542558	2540797	279014	277316	SPAC1952.07	SPBC18H10.11c	rad1	ppr2	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.045066879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786295	2542558	2540348	279014	276877	SPAC1952.07	SPBC29A10.05	rad1	exo1	rad19	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.676910426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786296	2542558	2540338	279014	276867	SPAC1952.07	SPBC2G2.13c	rad1	dcd1	rad19	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.049928463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786297	2542558	2538706	279014	275290	SPAC1952.07	SPCC338.08	rad1	ctp1	rad19	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503594709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786298	2542558	2540352	279014	276881	SPAC1952.07	SPBC215.03c	rad1	csn1	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.871022431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786299	2542558	2543510	279014	279928	SPAC1952.07	SPAC30D11.07	rad1	nth1	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.045342878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786300	2542558	2541166	279014	277681	SPAC1952.07	SPBC725.15	rad1	ura5	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637216914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786301	2542558	2539667	279014	276222	SPAC1952.07	SPBC13G1.08c	rad1	ash2	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.134040162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786302	2542558	2542007	279014	278490	SPAC1952.07	SPAC20H4.07	rad1	rad57	rad19	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.565489507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786303	2542558	2540997	279014	277513	SPAC1952.07	SPBC3H7.06c	rad1	pof9	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703947594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786304	2542558	2543244	279014	279672	SPAC1952.07	SPAC6B12.06c	rad1	rrg9	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.690864846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786305	2542558	2539974	279014	276518	SPAC1952.07	SPBC32H8.07	rad1	git5	rad19	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.048669894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786306	2542558	2541241	279014	277755	SPAC1952.07	SPBC887.17	rad1	SPBC887.17	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443634969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786307	2542558	2540318	279014	276848	SPAC1952.07	SPBC30B4.04c	rad1	sol1	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706449046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786308	2542558	2540599	279014	277125	SPAC1952.07	SPBC29A3.10c	rad1	atp14	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.076506392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786309	2542558	2540229	279014	276761	SPAC1952.07	SPBC31F10.15c	rad1	atp15	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.147498181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786310	2542558	2540946	279014	277462	SPAC1952.07	SPBC36.04	rad1	cys11	rad19	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384679455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786311	2542558	2539686	279014	276241	SPAC1952.07	SPBC1734.06	rad1	rhp18	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569054711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786312	2542558	2539555	279014	276116	SPAC1952.07	SPCC4B3.08	rad1	lsg1	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317395287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786313	2542558	2542881	279014	279326	SPAC1952.07	SPAC13F5.03c	rad1	gld1	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.48251176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786314	2542558	2539770	279014	276321	SPAC1952.07	SPBC1685.11	rad1	rlp1	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385133173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786315	2542558	2543096	279014	279528	SPAC1952.07	SPAC977.05c	rad1	SPAC977.05c	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703047009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786316	2542558	2541531	279014	278031	SPAC1952.07	SPAC25A8.01c	rad1	fft3	rad19	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.602139538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786317	2542558	2543633	279014	280047	SPAC1952.07	SPAC3H8.05c	rad1	mms1	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.054389749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786318	2542558	2540936	279014	277452	SPAC1952.07	SPBC800.05c	rad1	atb2	rad19	alp2|ban5|tub1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980497376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786319	2542558	2539205	279014	275775	SPAC1952.07	SPCC4B3.15	rad1	mid1	rad19	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.472336506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786320	2542558	2543387	279014	279809	SPAC1952.07	SPAPB1E7.02c	rad1	mcl1	rad19	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.731514112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786321	2542558	2542886	279014	279331	SPAC1952.07	SPAC1486.01	rad1	SPAC1486.01	rad19	sod2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.568465935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786322	2542558	2540481	279014	277009	SPAC1952.07	SPBC2D10.12	rad1	rhp23	rad19	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.971465458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786323	2542558	2541272	279014	277786	SPAC1952.07	SPBC947.03c	rad1	naa38	rad19	mak31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448365767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786324	2542558	2542943	279014	279384	SPAC1952.07	SPBC1348.03	rad1	SPBC1348.03	rad19	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197423619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786325	2542513	2538961	278971	275535	SPAC1952.05	SPCC285.14	gcn5	trs130	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.838515098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786326	2542513	2543529	278971	279947	SPAC1952.05	SPAC4C5.02c	gcn5	ryh1	kat2	hos1|sat7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816605996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786327	2542513	2542598	278971	279052	SPAC1952.05	SPAC6G10.08	gcn5	idp1	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.090413867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786328	2542513	2542066	278971	278543	SPAC1952.05	SPAC227.05	gcn5	SPAC227.05	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455225039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786329	2542513	2541912	278971	278402	SPAC1952.05	SPAC222.16c	gcn5	csn3	kat2	SPAC821.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.982648256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786330	2542513	2541818	278971	278309	SPAC1952.05	SPAC11G7.02	gcn5	pub1	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.150058371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786331	2542513	2539582	278971	276141	SPAC1952.05	SPCC594.07c	gcn5	bqt3	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979034235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786332	2542513	2542293	278971	278761	SPAC1952.05	SPAC17G8.14c	gcn5	pck1	kat2	SPAC22H10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.038551136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786333	2542513	2540528	278971	277056	SPAC1952.05	SPBC18H10.04c	gcn5	sce3	kat2	tif48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.503786329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786334	2542513	2538993	278971	275567	SPAC1952.05	SPCC162.12	gcn5	tco89	kat2	SPCC1753.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.198974811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786335	2542513	2538896	278971	275474	SPAC1952.05	SPCC584.11c	gcn5	SPCC584.11c	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875061946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786336	2542513	2539930	278971	276474	SPAC1952.05	SPBC1198.11c	gcn5	reb1	kat2	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.206546803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786337	2542513	2540068	278971	276606	SPAC1952.05	SPBC1734.12c	gcn5	alg12	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.552942249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786338	2542513	2541117	278971	277632	SPAC1952.05	SPBC646.13	gcn5	sds23	kat2	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.743980948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786339	2542513	2540161	278971	276696	SPAC1952.05	SPBC13E7.03c	gcn5	SPBC13E7.03c	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32685187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786340	2542513	2539201	278971	275772	SPAC1952.05	SPCC188.09c	gcn5	pfl4	kat2	SPCC188.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.023297719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786341	2542513	2540491	278971	277019	SPAC1952.05	SPBC28E12.04	gcn5	SPBC28E12.04	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327765143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786342	2542513	2538806	278971	275387	SPAC1952.05	SPCC1840.09	gcn5	SPCC1840.09	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816337404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786343	2542513	2543320	278971	279744	SPAC1952.05	SPAPJ695.01c	gcn5	SPAPJ695.01c	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.144544567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786344	2542513	3361375	278971	280451	SPAC1952.05	SPAC212.06c	gcn5	SPAC212.06c	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.126514923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786345	2542513	2540975	278971	277491	SPAC1952.05	SPBC354.12	gcn5	gpd3	kat2	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.646723437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786346	2542513	2539420	278971	275985	SPAC1952.05	SPCC970.07c	gcn5	raf2	kat2	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.214412906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786347	2542513	2541200	278971	277714	SPAC1952.05	SPBC8D2.03c	gcn5	hhf2	kat2	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.488327362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786348	2542513	2542468	278971	278929	SPAC1952.05	SPAC1D4.09c	gcn5	rtf2	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.122788944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786349	2542513	2542107	278971	278583	SPAC1952.05	SPAC30.01c	gcn5	sec72	kat2	sec7b|sec702	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987877707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786350	2542513	2541013	278971	277528	SPAC1952.05	SPBC3H7.13	gcn5	far10	kat2	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.137998818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786351	2542513	2539564	278971	276125	SPAC1952.05	SPCC550.12	gcn5	arp6	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.517005331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786352	2542513	2540029	278971	276573	SPAC1952.05	SPBC16A3.01	gcn5	spn3	kat2	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701018823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786353	2542513	2538801	278971	275382	SPAC1952.05	SPCC285.13c	gcn5	nup60	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.333844363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786354	2542513	2541026	278971	277541	SPAC1952.05	SPBC337.09	gcn5	erg28	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.688060333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786355	2542513	3361381	278971	280457	SPAC1952.05	SPAC12G12.01c	gcn5	SPAC12G12.01c	kat2	SPAC630.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043427709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786356	2542513	2539797	278971	276347	SPAC1952.05	SPBC16G5.14c	gcn5	rps3	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.762754854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786357	2542513	2539575	278971	276135	SPAC1952.05	SPCP20C8.02c	gcn5	SPCP20C8.02c	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.380443671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786358	2542513	2540929	278971	277445	SPAC1952.05	SPBC354.03	gcn5	swd3	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.314747632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786359	2542513	2539314	278971	275880	SPAC1952.05	SPCC548.05c	gcn5	dbl5	kat2	SPCC548.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.613364125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786360	2542513	2541346	278971	277857	SPAC1952.05	SPBP8B7.08c	gcn5	ppm1	kat2	SPBP8B7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.216272046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786361	2542513	2542022	278971	278505	SPAC1952.05	SPAC23A1.03	gcn5	apt1	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.55917076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786362	2542513	2541323	278971	277835	SPAC1952.05	SPBP35G2.14	gcn5	SPBP35G2.14	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.3424048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786363	2542513	2542135	278971	278611	SPAC1952.05	SPAC13A11.04c	gcn5	ubp8	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.050772823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786364	2542513	2539365	278971	275931	SPAC1952.05	SPCC24B10.16c	gcn5	SPCC24B10.16c	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321383106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786365	2542513	2542277	278971	278746	SPAC1952.05	SPAC17A5.02c	gcn5	dbr1	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.614055387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786366	2542513	2539441	278971	276004	SPAC1952.05	SPCPJ732.02c	gcn5	xks1	kat2	SPCPJ732.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.938947204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786367	2542513	2540364	278971	276893	SPAC1952.05	SPBC29B5.02c	gcn5	isp4	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820024627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786368	2542513	2540851	278971	277368	SPAC1952.05	SPBC4F6.04	gcn5	rpl2502	kat2	rpl23a-2|rpl25b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145672127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786369	2542513	2542220	278971	278694	SPAC1952.05	SPAC1A6.03c	gcn5	SPAC1A6.03c	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.170387828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786370	2542513	2543563	278971	279979	SPAC1952.05	SPAC664.02c	gcn5	arp8	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.608737555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786371	2542513	2541522	278971	278023	SPAC1952.05	SPAC23E2.01	gcn5	fep1	kat2	gaf2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039692104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786372	2542513	2543426	278971	279846	SPAC1952.05	SPAC631.02	gcn5	bdf2	kat2	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.434139726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786373	2542513	2542530	278971	278988	SPAC1952.05	SPAC1399.02	gcn5	SPAC1399.02	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574437619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786374	2542513	2541489	278971	277991	SPAC1952.05	SPAC23D3.11	gcn5	ayr1	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.774616203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786375	2542513	2538906	278971	275483	SPAC1952.05	SPCC1259.03	gcn5	rpa12	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.90065203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786376	2542513	2542253	278971	278723	SPAC1952.05	SPAC17H9.04c	gcn5	SPAC17H9.04c	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.120006501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786377	2542513	2542981	278971	279419	SPAC1952.05	SPAC824.02	gcn5	bst1	kat2	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.044376381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786378	2542513	2540825	278971	277343	SPAC1952.05	SPBC428.08c	gcn5	clr4	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63334267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786379	2542513	2540964	278971	277480	SPAC1952.05	SPBC365.16	gcn5	SPBC365.16	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.02326207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786380	2542513	2539960	278971	276504	SPAC1952.05	SPBC15D4.15	gcn5	pho2	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037438951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786381	2542513	2539388	278971	275953	SPAC1952.05	SPCC24B10.12	gcn5	cgi121	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.68891436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786382	2542513	2542177	278971	278652	SPAC1952.05	SPAC17H9.08	gcn5	SPAC17H9.08	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.882373888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786383	2542513	2539870	278971	276416	SPAC1952.05	SPBC1709.18	gcn5	tif452	kat2	SPBC409.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.800331724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786384	2542513	2540631	278971	277157	SPAC1952.05	SPBC25B2.10	gcn5	SPBC25B2.10	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875355832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786385	2542513	2541093	278971	277608	SPAC1952.05	SPBC646.08c	gcn5	SPBC646.08c	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.126285698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786386	2542513	2538770	278971	275353	SPAC1952.05	SPCC1753.02c	gcn5	git3	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.838304077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786387	2542513	2539628	278971	276185	SPAC1952.05	SPBC1604.03c	gcn5	SPBC1604.03c	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816244805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786388	2542513	2540338	278971	276867	SPAC1952.05	SPBC2G2.13c	gcn5	dcd1	kat2	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.319003551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786389	2542513	2542507	278971	278965	SPAC1952.05	SPAC18G6.13	gcn5	SPAC18G6.13	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.563415458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786390	2542513	2542168	278971	278643	SPAC1952.05	SPAC17A5.16	gcn5	ftp105	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.557391951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786391	2542513	2539484	278971	276047	SPAC1952.05	SPCC594.04c	gcn5	SPCC594.04c	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.990748295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786392	2542513	2541701	278971	278197	SPAC1952.05	SPAC1296.03c	gcn5	sxa2	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193534904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786393	2542513	2542469	278971	278930	SPAC1952.05	SPAC19A8.04	gcn5	erg5	kat2	cyp61	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632235243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786394	2542513	2539999	278971	276543	SPAC1952.05	SPBC1734.15	gcn5	rsc4	kat2	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.279315246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786395	2542513	2542522	278971	278980	SPAC1952.05	SPAC19A8.03	gcn5	ymr1	kat2	SPAC19A8.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.530730031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786396	2542513	2541166	278971	277681	SPAC1952.05	SPBC725.15	gcn5	ura5	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866589772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786397	2542513	2539603	278971	276161	SPAC1952.05	SPBC1289.06c	gcn5	ppr8	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.763169586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786398	2542513	2539689	278971	276244	SPAC1952.05	SPBC1861.03	gcn5	mak10	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.341408617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786399	2542513	2539857	278971	276404	SPAC1952.05	SPBC1604.20c	gcn5	tea2	kat2	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.986966871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786400	2542513	2541413	278971	277921	SPAC1952.05	SPBPJ4664.06	gcn5	gpt1	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815363635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786401	2542513	2541532	278971	278032	SPAC1952.05	SPAC2C4.15c	gcn5	ubx2	kat2	ucp13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.102063934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786402	2542513	2543643	278971	280057	SPAC1952.05	SPAC3G9.07c	gcn5	hos2	kat2	hda1|phd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.359926008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786403	2542513	2538852	278971	275433	SPAC1952.05	SPCC4E9.01c	gcn5	rec11	kat2	SPCC550.16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.989645911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786404	2542513	2543406	278971	279828	SPAC1952.05	SPAC9.12c	gcn5	atp12	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.056063668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786405	2542513	2539284	278971	275852	SPAC1952.05	SPCC584.15c	gcn5	SPCC584.15c	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581447991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786406	2542513	2540326	278971	276856	SPAC1952.05	SPBC2G5.06c	gcn5	hmt2	kat2	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.566187471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786407	2542513	2538769	278971	275352	SPAC1952.05	SPCC126.04c	gcn5	sgf73	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.053792988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786408	2542513	2539667	278971	276222	SPAC1952.05	SPBC13G1.08c	gcn5	ash2	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.802798053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786409	2542513	3361269	278971	280345	SPAC1952.05	SPBC31A8.01c	gcn5	rtn1	kat2	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573008471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786410	2542513	2542032	278971	278514	SPAC1952.05	SPAC23C11.04c	gcn5	pnk1	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.79185639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786411	2542513	2538873	278971	275452	SPAC1952.05	SPCC306.11	gcn5	SPCC306.11	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634366809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786412	2542513	2538945	278971	275519	SPAC1952.05	SPCC1739.06c	gcn5	SPCC1739.06c	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.260073625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786413	2542513	2540751	278971	277273	SPAC1952.05	SPBC20F10.10	gcn5	psl1	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.716218724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786414	2542513	2542419	278971	278882	SPAC1952.05	SPAC17G6.05c	gcn5	bro1	kat2	SPAC17G6.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98082576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786415	2542513	2539482	278971	276045	SPAC1952.05	SPCC417.06c	gcn5	mug27	kat2	ppk35|slk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.12265587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786416	2542513	2543495	278971	279914	SPAC1952.05	SPAC513.03	gcn5	mfm2	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635358058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786417	2542513	2540836	278971	277354	SPAC1952.05	SPBC18H10.19	gcn5	vps38	kat2	atg14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090522313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786418	2542513	2540077	278971	276615	SPAC1952.05	SPBC17D11.04c	gcn5	nto1	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.412326004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786419	2542513	2541241	278971	277755	SPAC1952.05	SPBC887.17	gcn5	SPBC887.17	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.540167215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786420	2542513	2543378	278971	279800	SPAC1952.05	SPAC3H8.07c	gcn5	pac10	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.013628279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786421	2542513	2540318	278971	276848	SPAC1952.05	SPBC30B4.04c	gcn5	sol1	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.671663804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786422	2542513	2542549	278971	279006	SPAC1952.05	SPAC19A8.11c	gcn5	SPAC19A8.11c	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387247724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786423	2542513	2539953	278971	276497	SPAC1952.05	SPBC1709.11c	gcn5	png2	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.296633678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786424	2542513	2540990	278971	277506	SPAC1952.05	SPBC36B7.06c	gcn5	mug20	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143383849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786425	2542513	2543119	278971	279551	SPAC1952.05	SPAC3A11.07	gcn5	nde2	kat2	SPAC3A11.07	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.499818239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786426	2542513	2542008	278971	278491	SPAC1952.05	SPAC2G11.07c	gcn5	ptc3	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.174912914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786427	2542513	2541708	278971	278203	SPAC1952.05	SPAC31A2.02	gcn5	trm112	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.870700767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786428	2542513	2539847	278971	276395	SPAC1952.05	SPBC530.14c	gcn5	dsk1	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.018860796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786429	2542513	2540599	278971	277125	SPAC1952.05	SPBC29A3.10c	gcn5	atp14	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.096636621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786430	2542513	2543517	278971	279935	SPAC1952.05	SPAC3G9.05	gcn5	spa2	kat2	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.309496215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786431	2542513	2539427	278971	275992	SPAC1952.05	SPCC663.15c	gcn5	SPCC663.15c	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775244473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786432	2542513	2538884	278971	275462	SPAC1952.05	SPCC1393.08	gcn5	SPCC1393.08	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.435113072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786433	2542513	2539213	278971	275783	SPAC1952.05	SPCC285.10c	gcn5	SPCC285.10c	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04244541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786434	2542513	2542255	278971	278725	SPAC1952.05	SPAC57A7.08	gcn5	pzh1	kat2	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391496241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786435	2542513	2543011	278971	279449	SPAC1952.05	SPAC10F6.11c	gcn5	atg17	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.306540563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786436	2542513	2541378	278971	277889	SPAC1952.05	SPBP8B7.21	gcn5	ubp3	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990171069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786437	2542513	2540930	278971	277446	SPAC1952.05	SPBC354.10	gcn5	def1	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.489143203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786438	2542513	2541963	278971	278449	SPAC1952.05	SPAC21E11.04	gcn5	aca1	kat2	ppr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864044888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786439	2542513	3361520	278971	280596	SPAC1952.05	SPAC1610.02c	gcn5	SPAC1610.02c	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842601399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786440	2542513	2540946	278971	277462	SPAC1952.05	SPBC36.04	gcn5	cys11	kat2	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323920679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786441	2542513	2542673	278971	279126	SPAC1952.05	SPAC26A3.11	gcn5	SPAC26A3.11	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.689580245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786442	2542513	2542875	278971	279320	SPAC1952.05	SPAC13G7.02c	gcn5	ssa1	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.053833981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786443	2542513	2542170	278971	278645	SPAC1952.05	SPAC17G8.13c	gcn5	mst2	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.878496133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786444	2542513	2539706	278971	276259	SPAC1952.05	SPBC16G5.13	gcn5	ptf2	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.502592026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786445	2542513	2539160	278971	275732	SPAC1952.05	SPCC18.17c	gcn5	SPCC18.17c	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.906044361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786446	2542513	2543051	278971	279486	SPAC1952.05	SPAC1071.08	gcn5	rpp203	kat2	rla6|rpp2-3|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321012372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786447	2542513	2542883	278971	279328	SPAC1952.05	SPAC1486.04c	gcn5	alm1	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036265759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786448	2542513	2542881	278971	279326	SPAC1952.05	SPAC13F5.03c	gcn5	gld1	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.478731116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786449	2542513	2539030	278971	275603	SPAC1952.05	SPCP1E11.02	gcn5	ppk38	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.269384226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786450	2542513	2540800	278971	277319	SPAC1952.05	SPBC409.20c	gcn5	psh3	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.345949026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786451	2542513	2538717	278971	275301	SPAC1952.05	SPCC1235.02	gcn5	bio2	kat2	SPCC320.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.201103348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786452	2542513	2538966	278971	275540	SPAC1952.05	SPCC18.10	gcn5	SPCC18.10	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.81712494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786453	2542513	2541100	278971	277615	SPAC1952.05	SPBC651.04	gcn5	SPBC651.04	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634518893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786454	2542513	2541432	278971	277937	SPAC1952.05	SPAC1F5.05c	gcn5	mso1	kat2	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706483034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786455	2542513	2541531	278971	278031	SPAC1952.05	SPAC25A8.01c	gcn5	fft3	kat2	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.614101685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786456	2542513	3361329	278971	280405	SPAC1952.05	SPBC25H2.10c	gcn5	SPBC25H2.10c	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.345581215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786457	2542513	2541149	278971	277664	SPAC1952.05	SPBC651.03c	gcn5	gyp10	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038901412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786458	2542513	2542222	278971	278695	SPAC1952.05	SPAC31G5.18c	gcn5	sde2	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.660935264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786459	2542513	2539668	278971	276223	SPAC1952.05	SPBC11B10.10c	gcn5	pht1	kat2	pi001	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.917622054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786460	2542513	2540516	278971	277044	SPAC1952.05	SPBC21C3.01c	gcn5	vps13a	kat2	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992084958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786461	2542513	2543672	278971	280086	SPAC1952.05	SPAC4H3.01	gcn5	SPAC4H3.01	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778428774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786462	2542513	2539928	278971	276472	SPAC1952.05	SPBC1604.08c	gcn5	imp1	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.991615383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786463	2542513	2540422	278971	276950	SPAC1952.05	SPBC27.08c	gcn5	sua1	kat2	SPBC28F2.01c|asp1|met3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.386695762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786464	2542513	2540140	278971	276677	SPAC1952.05	SPBC16C6.08c	gcn5	qcr6	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925999792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786465	2542513	2540146	278971	276683	SPAC1952.05	SPBC17A3.06	gcn5	SPBC17A3.06	kat2	pi040	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.869509213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786466	2542513	2539189	278971	275760	SPAC1952.05	SPCC1682.16	gcn5	rpt4	kat2	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.128768792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786467	2542513	2540134	278971	276671	SPAC1952.05	SPBC17A3.03c	gcn5	SPBC17A3.03c	kat2	pi043	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.50533516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786468	2542513	2542021	278971	278504	SPAC1952.05	SPAP14E8.02	gcn5	tos4	kat2	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.443671516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786469	2542513	2540504	278971	277032	SPAC1952.05	SPBC24C6.10c	gcn5	dip1	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.131857522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786470	2542513	2539483	278971	276046	SPAC1952.05	SPCC584.02	gcn5	cuf2	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.782526185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786471	2542513	2541238	278971	277752	SPAC1952.05	SPBC8E4.05c	gcn5	SPBC8E4.05c	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.810220718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786472	2542513	2542716	278971	279169	SPAC1952.05	SPAC25H1.07	gcn5	emc1	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.269137787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786473	2542513	2543220	278971	279648	SPAC1952.05	SPAPB21F2.02	gcn5	SPAPB21F2.02	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643801699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786474	2542513	2541806	278971	278297	SPAC1952.05	SPAC4G8.13c	gcn5	prz1	kat2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.768611219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786475	2542513	2540125	278971	276662	SPAC1952.05	SPBC16C6.01c	gcn5	SPBC16C6.01c	kat2	SPBC543.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.144328122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786476	2542513	2540173	278971	276706	SPAC1952.05	SPBC106.13	gcn5	SPBC106.13	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.570374635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786477	2542513	2540093	278971	276631	SPAC1952.05	SPBC115.02c	gcn5	afg1	kat2	SPBC115.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92307472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786478	2542513	2541478	278971	277980	SPAC1952.05	SPAC2F7.17	gcn5	mrf1	kat2	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.048763624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786479	2542513	2543372	278971	279794	SPAC1952.05	SPAPB1A10.09	gcn5	ase1	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.784197564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786480	2542513	2541272	278971	277786	SPAC1952.05	SPBC947.03c	gcn5	naa38	kat2	mak31	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869184133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786481	2542513	2542943	278971	279384	SPAC1952.05	SPBC1348.03	gcn5	SPBC1348.03	kat2	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633146038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786482	2542513	2542617	278971	279071	SPAC1952.05	SPAC13A11.01c	gcn5	rga8	kat2	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.4061282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786483	2542513	2540320	278971	276850	SPAC1952.05	SPBC3D6.04c	gcn5	mad1	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641813096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786484	2542513	2541875	278971	278365	SPAC1952.05	SPAC22F3.06c	gcn5	lon1	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.998146504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786485	2542513	2542836	278971	279282	SPAC1952.05	SPAC13G7.06	gcn5	met16	kat2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.383329399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786486	2542646	2539050	279100	275623	SPAC11H11.05c	SPCC11E10.08	fta6	rik1	sma6	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.801769166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786487	2542646	2541117	279100	277632	SPAC11H11.05c	SPBC646.13	fta6	sds23	sma6	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.549529116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786488	2542646	2542468	279100	278929	SPAC11H11.05c	SPAC1D4.09c	fta6	rtf2	sma6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330323063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786489	2542646	2541205	279100	277719	SPAC11H11.05c	SPBC839.02	fta6	SPBC839.02	sma6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.715075423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786490	2542646	2538801	279100	275382	SPAC11H11.05c	SPCC285.13c	fta6	nup60	sma6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.748284387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786491	2542646	2542022	279100	278505	SPAC11H11.05c	SPAC23A1.03	fta6	apt1	sma6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.184887257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786492	2542646	2540425	279100	276953	SPAC11H11.05c	SPBC27.06c	fta6	mgr2	sma6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.212029239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786493	2542646	2543426	279100	279846	SPAC11H11.05c	SPAC631.02	fta6	bdf2	sma6	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510992061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786494	2542646	2540825	279100	277343	SPAC11H11.05c	SPBC428.08c	fta6	clr4	sma6	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.614080057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786495	2542646	2541776	279100	278270	SPAC11H11.05c	SPAC23H3.05c	fta6	swd1	sma6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.891273449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786496	2542646	2540673	279100	277198	SPAC11H11.05c	SPBC1D7.03	fta6	mug80	sma6	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870870142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786497	2542646	2541735	279100	278229	SPAC11H11.05c	SPAC7D4.04	fta6	atg11	sma6	taf1|cvt9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384921646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786498	2542646	2539898	279100	276444	SPAC11H11.05c	SPBC12D12.07c	fta6	trx2	sma6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.068008458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786499	2542646	2542007	279100	278490	SPAC11H11.05c	SPAC20H4.07	fta6	rad57	sma6	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.117594162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786500	2542646	2540224	279100	276757	SPAC11H11.05c	SPBC32H8.06	fta6	mug93	sma6	pi018|SPACTOKYO_453.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454584127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786501	2542646	2538841	279100	275422	SPAC11H11.05c	SPCC550.03c	fta6	SPCC550.03c	sma6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.501387003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786502	2542646	2541248	279100	277762	SPAC11H11.05c	SPBC8D2.10c	fta6	rmt3	sma6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.008006492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786503	2542646	2540967	279100	277483	SPAC11H11.05c	SPBC36B7.08c	fta6	SPBC36B7.08c	sma6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.600060664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786504	2542646	2540533	279100	277061	SPAC11H11.05c	SPBC29A10.16c	fta6	SPBC29A10.16c	sma6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638897127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786505	2542646	2541378	279100	277889	SPAC11H11.05c	SPBP8B7.21	fta6	ubp3	sma6	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.16156351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786506	2542646	2542781	279100	279230	SPAC11H11.05c	SPAC57A10.12c	fta6	ura3	sma6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.123864337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786507	2542646	3361389	279100	280465	SPAC11H11.05c	SPAC977.13c	fta6	SPAC977.13c	sma6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635319215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786508	2542646	2538762	279100	275345	SPAC11H11.05c	SPCC306.04c	fta6	set1	sma6	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.989101773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786509	2542646	2542767	279100	279217	SPAC11H11.05c	SPAC1565.07c	fta6	knd1	sma6	SPAC1565.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383538272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786510	2542646	2540498	279100	277026	SPAC11H11.05c	SPBC27.02c	fta6	ask1	sma6	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.109353858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786511	2542646	2541279	279100	277792	SPAC11H11.05c	SPBC8E4.03	fta6	SPBC8E4.03	sma6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.064669544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786512	2542646	2543662	279100	280076	SPAC11H11.05c	SPAC9.07c	fta6	SPAC9.07c	sma6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326947905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786513	2542646	2540115	279100	276652	SPAC11H11.05c	SPBC1778.02	fta6	rap1	sma6	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.892562781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786514	2542646	2541531	279100	278031	SPAC11H11.05c	SPAC25A8.01c	fta6	fft3	sma6	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.194205336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786515	2542646	2542418	279100	278881	SPAC11H11.05c	SPAC1805.07c	fta6	dad2	sma6	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.010877306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786516	2542646	2542574	279100	279030	SPAC11H11.05c	SPAC186.05c	fta6	SPAC186.05c	sma6	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933379581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786517	2542646	2542442	279100	278904	SPAC11H11.05c	SPACUNK12.02c	fta6	cmk1	sma6	CaMK-I|SPAC25D11.02C	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.566843208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786518	2542646	2538861	279100	275441	SPAC11H11.05c	SPCC1620.11	fta6	nup97	sma6	mug87	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578040267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786519	2542646	2541357	279100	277868	SPAC11H11.05c	SPBPB7E8.01	fta6	SPBPB7E8.01	sma6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.70375715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786520	2542646	2541806	279100	278297	SPAC11H11.05c	SPAC4G8.13c	fta6	prz1	sma6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.50808885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786521	2542646	2543327	279100	279750	SPAC11H11.05c	SPAC1D4.06c	fta6	csk1	sma6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322190031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786522	2542646	2539743	279100	276295	SPAC11H11.05c	SPBC16A3.08c	fta6	oga1	sma6	SPBC16A3.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.504167625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786523	2542646	2542424	279100	278886	SPAC11H11.05c	SPAC1805.14	fta6	SPAC1805.14	sma6	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979942777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786524	2542646	2540309	279100	276839	SPAC11H11.05c	SPBC21B10.13c	fta6	yox1	sma6	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443648309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786525	2542646	2540787	279100	277306	SPAC11H11.05c	SPBC1921.07c	fta6	sgf29	sma6	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637607108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786526	2542568	2539050	279024	275623	SPAC1952.02	SPCC11E10.08	tma23	rik1	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.016903983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786527	2542568	2542862	279024	279308	SPAC1952.02	SPAC140.03	tma23	arb1	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.132286374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786528	2542568	2542598	279024	279052	SPAC1952.02	SPAC6G10.08	tma23	idp1	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.703352057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786529	2542568	2543414	279024	279836	SPAC1952.02	SPAC630.10	tma23	SPAC630.10	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.944274919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786530	2542568	2540956	279024	277472	SPAC1952.02	SPBC409.06	tma23	uch2	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.819654573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786531	2542568	2542671	279024	279124	SPAC1952.02	SPAC824.09c	tma23	SPAC824.09c	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325094489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786532	2542568	2540528	279024	277056	SPAC1952.02	SPBC18H10.04c	tma23	sce3	SPAC1952.02	tif48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808249794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786533	2542568	2539930	279024	276474	SPAC1952.02	SPBC1198.11c	tma23	reb1	SPAC1952.02	SPBC660.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932020248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786534	2542568	2539876	279024	276422	SPAC1952.02	SPBC1734.07c	tma23	trs8502	SPAC1952.02	SPBC1734.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817151785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786535	2542568	2541117	279024	277632	SPAC1952.02	SPBC646.13	tma23	sds23	SPAC1952.02	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.691368731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786536	2542568	2540347	279024	276876	SPAC1952.02	SPBC30B4.08	tma23	eri1	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.564156059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786537	2542568	2540686	279024	277211	SPAC1952.02	SPBC21D10.10	tma23	bdc1	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515102121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786538	2542568	2539890	279024	276436	SPAC1952.02	SPBC16C6.03c	tma23	SPBC16C6.03c	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.449411466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786539	2542568	2542701	279024	279154	SPAC1952.02	SPAC26H5.05	tma23	mga2	SPAC1952.02	SPAC26H5.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.412919311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786540	2542568	2541361	279024	277872	SPAC1952.02	SPBP8B7.10c	tma23	utp16	SPAC1952.02	SPBP8B7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.942920264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786541	2542568	2539420	279024	275985	SPAC1952.02	SPCC970.07c	tma23	raf2	SPAC1952.02	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.006963232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786542	2542568	2543661	279024	280075	SPAC1952.02	SPAC644.08	tma23	SPAC644.08	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.077836306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786543	2542568	2540919	279024	277435	SPAC1952.02	SPBC543.07	tma23	pek1	SPAC1952.02	mkk1|skh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.662043206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786544	2542568	2543453	279024	279873	SPAC1952.02	SPAC3G9.03	tma23	rpl2301	SPAC1952.02	rpl23-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.464903217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786545	2542568	2539331	279024	275897	SPAC1952.02	SPCC24B10.09	tma23	rps1702	SPAC1952.02	rps17|rps17-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035899865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786546	2542568	2540313	279024	276843	SPAC1952.02	SPBC337.04	tma23	ppk27	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451648686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786547	2542568	2538833	279024	275414	SPAC1952.02	SPCP1E11.11	tma23	puf6	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.777897486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786548	2542568	2540727	279024	277250	SPAC1952.02	SPBC1921.03c	tma23	mex67	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.41070162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786549	2542568	2542135	279024	278611	SPAC1952.02	SPAC13A11.04c	tma23	ubp8	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573085782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786550	2542568	2540830	279024	277348	SPAC1952.02	SPBC18H10.16	tma23	can1	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989333418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786551	2542568	2540851	279024	277368	SPAC1952.02	SPBC4F6.04	tma23	rpl2502	SPAC1952.02	rpl23a-2|rpl25b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868728151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786552	2542568	2542220	279024	278694	SPAC1952.02	SPAC1A6.03c	tma23	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.83476673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786553	2542568	2539129	279024	275701	SPAC1952.02	SPCC338.14	tma23	ado1	SPAC1952.02	SPCC338.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.657518249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786554	2542568	2543108	279024	279540	SPAC1952.02	SPAC3A12.13c	tma23	SPAC3A12.13c	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.568750765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786555	2542568	2543563	279024	279979	SPAC1952.02	SPAC664.02c	tma23	arp8	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.275291645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786556	2542568	2543584	279024	279999	SPAC1952.02	SPAPB1E7.11c	tma23	SPAPB1E7.11c	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.565897319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786557	2542568	2541905	279024	278395	SPAC1952.02	SPAC6G9.01c	tma23	SPAC6G9.01c	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447405427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786558	2542568	2540415	279024	276943	SPAC1952.02	SPBC30B4.06c	tma23	SPBC30B4.06c	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818538276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786559	2542568	2539574	279024	276134	SPAC1952.02	SPCPB16A4.04c	tma23	trm8	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.513935513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786560	2542568	2540825	279024	277343	SPAC1952.02	SPBC428.08c	tma23	clr4	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.172634185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786561	2542568	2540964	279024	277480	SPAC1952.02	SPBC365.16	tma23	SPBC365.16	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.959756347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786562	2542568	2542239	279024	278711	SPAC1952.02	SPAC18G6.02c	tma23	chp1	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38505366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786563	2542568	2541379	279024	277890	SPAC1952.02	SPBP8B7.27	tma23	mug30	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.970010974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786564	2542568	2542036	279024	278518	SPAC1952.02	SPAC23A1.19c	tma23	hrq1	SPAC1952.02	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989224728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786565	2542568	2539388	279024	275953	SPAC1952.02	SPCC24B10.12	tma23	cgi121	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.89533332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786566	2542568	2540797	279024	277316	SPAC1952.02	SPBC18H10.11c	tma23	ppr2	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.853858133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786567	2542568	2541776	279024	278270	SPAC1952.02	SPAC23H3.05c	tma23	swd1	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.369161891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786568	2542568	2541264	279024	277778	SPAC1952.02	SPBC902.06	tma23	mto2	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870155873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786569	2542568	2543144	279024	279576	SPAC1952.02	SPAC3F10.05c	tma23	mug113	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.150181073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786570	2542568	2542249	279024	278719	SPAC1952.02	SPAC30D11.14c	tma23	SPAC30D11.14c	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928209923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786571	2542568	2538770	279024	275353	SPAC1952.02	SPCC1753.02c	tma23	git3	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043545103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786572	2542568	2540647	279024	277172	SPAC1952.02	SPBC18H10.07	tma23	SPBC18H10.07	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.177882846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786573	2542568	2542652	279024	279106	SPAC1952.02	SPAC1687.15	tma23	gsk3	SPAC1952.02	skp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.203334937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786574	2542568	2542755	279024	279205	SPAC1952.02	SPAC1687.10	tma23	mcp1	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.128267233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786575	2542568	2540673	279024	277198	SPAC1952.02	SPBC1D7.03	tma23	mug80	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.256449018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786576	2542568	2543638	279024	280052	SPAC1952.02	SPAC3H8.09c	tma23	nab3	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.271897817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786577	2542568	2541889	279024	278379	SPAC1952.02	SPAC2F7.03c	tma23	pom1	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.509767899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786578	2542568	2539454	279024	276017	SPAC1952.02	SPCC622.15c	tma23	SPCC622.15c	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.30248526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786579	2542568	2541929	279024	278417	SPAC1952.02	SPAC23C4.12	tma23	hhp2	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.456884312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786580	2542568	2543643	279024	280057	SPAC1952.02	SPAC3G9.07c	tma23	hos2	SPAC1952.02	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.475801169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786581	2542568	2540231	279024	276763	SPAC1952.02	SPBC336.14c	tma23	ppk26	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57009703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786582	2542568	2540326	279024	276856	SPAC1952.02	SPBC2G5.06c	tma23	hmt2	SPAC1952.02	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442459832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786583	2542568	2539667	279024	276222	SPAC1952.02	SPBC13G1.08c	tma23	ash2	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.352509208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786584	2542568	2542032	279024	278514	SPAC1952.02	SPAC23C11.04c	tma23	pnk1	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.619375893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786585	2542568	2542014	279024	278497	SPAC1952.02	SPAC20H4.04	tma23	fml2	SPAC1952.02	mfh2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515249704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786586	2542568	2540836	279024	277354	SPAC1952.02	SPBC18H10.19	tma23	vps38	SPAC1952.02	atg14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.405142056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786587	2542568	2543378	279024	279800	SPAC1952.02	SPAC3H8.07c	tma23	pac10	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.257275136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786588	2542568	2539715	279024	276268	SPAC1952.02	SPBC1778.09	tma23	SPBC1778.09	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384612216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786589	2542568	2541041	279024	277556	SPAC1952.02	SPBC3D6.13c	tma23	pdi3	SPAC1952.02	pdi2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324367964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786590	2542568	2541464	279024	277966	SPAC1952.02	SPAC222.08c	tma23	SPAC222.08c	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.414759763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786591	2542568	2539847	279024	276395	SPAC1952.02	SPBC530.14c	tma23	dsk1	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.620211658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786592	2542568	2540184	279024	276717	SPAC1952.02	SPBC106.12c	tma23	SPBC106.12c	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820398337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786593	2542568	2541266	279024	277780	SPAC1952.02	SPBP16F5.05c	tma23	yar1	SPAC1952.02	SPBP16F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.035350557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786594	2542568	2540882	279024	277399	SPAC1952.02	SPBC4F6.08c	tma23	mrpl39	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.921591342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786595	2542568	2539569	279024	276129	SPAC1952.02	SPCPB16A4.03c	tma23	ade10	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.566856557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786596	2542568	2541337	279024	277848	SPAC1952.02	SPBP35G2.13c	tma23	swc2	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.894323291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786597	2542568	2539527	279024	276089	SPAC1952.02	SPCC338.16	tma23	pof3	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093425958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786598	2542568	2540691	279024	277216	SPAC1952.02	SPBC20F10.05	tma23	nrl1	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877041253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786599	2542568	2542973	279024	279412	SPAC1952.02	SPAC10F6.04	tma23	SPAC10F6.04	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451782522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786600	2542568	2538848	279024	275429	SPAC1952.02	SPCC613.12c	tma23	raf1	SPAC1952.02	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.74071294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786601	2542568	3361520	279024	280596	SPAC1952.02	SPAC1610.02c	tma23	SPAC1610.02c	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.536225191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786602	2542568	2541144	279024	277659	SPAC1952.02	SPBC685.06	tma23	rps001	SPAC1952.02	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044368779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786603	2542568	2540821	279024	277339	SPAC1952.02	SPBC800.03	tma23	clr3	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.786894636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786604	2542568	2540910	279024	277426	SPAC1952.02	SPBC577.02	tma23	rpl3801	SPAC1952.02	rpl38-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.568747681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786605	2542568	2542806	279024	279254	SPAC1952.02	SPAC1610.01	tma23	saf5	SPAC1952.02	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.275255236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786606	2542568	2542198	279024	278673	SPAC1952.02	SPAC6F12.09	tma23	rdp1	SPAC1952.02	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.251265605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786607	2542568	2539354	279024	275920	SPAC1952.02	SPCC4F11.03c	tma23	SPCC4F11.03c	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.382814188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786608	2542568	2541156	279024	277671	SPAC1952.02	SPBC685.07c	tma23	rpl2701	SPAC1952.02	rpl27-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143647343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786609	2542568	2538762	279024	275345	SPAC1952.02	SPCC306.04c	tma23	set1	SPAC1952.02	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.940983798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786610	2542568	2541175	279024	277689	SPAC1952.02	SPBC839.13c	tma23	rpl1601	SPAC1952.02	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.479563319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786611	2542568	2543670	279024	280084	SPAC1952.02	SPAPB1E7.06c	tma23	eme1	SPAC1952.02	mms4|slx2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.275123942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786612	2542568	2543304	279024	279728	SPAC1952.02	SPAC6B12.12	tma23	tom70	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.121437993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786613	2542568	2539246	279024	275816	SPAC1952.02	SPCC18.13	tma23	SPCC18.13	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.896294833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786614	2542568	2541531	279024	278031	SPAC1952.02	SPAC25A8.01c	tma23	fft3	SPAC1952.02	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.255146073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786615	2542568	2539029	279024	275602	SPAC1952.02	SPCC61.05	tma23	SPCC61.05	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043395129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786616	2542568	2540164	279024	276699	SPAC1952.02	SPBC1683.03c	tma23	SPBC1683.03c	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380466079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786617	2542568	2540677	279024	277202	SPAC1952.02	SPBC21B10.03c	tma23	ath1	SPAC1952.02	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.84671562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786618	2542568	2539514	279024	276076	SPAC1952.02	SPCC663.14c	tma23	trp663	SPAC1952.02	SPCC663.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046134327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786619	2542568	2542222	279024	278695	SPAC1952.02	SPAC31G5.18c	tma23	sde2	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.178479027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786620	2542568	2542826	279024	279273	SPAC1952.02	SPAC13G6.09	tma23	SPAC13G6.09	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.505588978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786621	2542568	2541789	279024	278281	SPAC1952.02	SPAC23H4.08	tma23	iwr1	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.707512938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786622	2542568	2539375	279024	275941	SPAC1952.02	SPCC4G3.11	tma23	mug154	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.49540126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786623	2542568	2539189	279024	275760	SPAC1952.02	SPCC1682.16	tma23	rpt4	SPAC1952.02	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.909276587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786624	2542568	2539178	279024	275749	SPAC1952.02	SPCC1682.14	tma23	rpl1902	SPAC1952.02	rpl19-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.505984205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786625	2542568	2542702	279024	279155	SPAC1952.02	SPAC8E11.01c	tma23	SPAC8E11.01c	SPAC1952.02	SPAC959.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869372448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786626	2542568	2541709	279024	278204	SPAC1952.02	SPAC3C7.02c	tma23	pil2	SPAC1952.02	SPAC3C7.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.840345095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786627	2542568	2543327	279024	279750	SPAC1952.02	SPAC1D4.06c	tma23	csk1	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86709905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786628	2542568	2538854	279024	275435	SPAC1952.02	SPCP1E11.05c	tma23	are2	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864457891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786629	2542568	2542175	279024	278650	SPAC1952.02	SPAC1F3.02c	tma23	mkh1	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.971599971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786630	2542568	2540360	279024	276889	SPAC1952.02	SPBC2G5.01	tma23	SPBC2G5.01	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.982693092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786631	2542568	2539085	279024	275657	SPAC1952.02	SPCC285.15c	tma23	rps2802	SPAC1952.02	rps28|rps28-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.666933565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786632	2542568	2543372	279024	279794	SPAC1952.02	SPAPB1A10.09	tma23	ase1	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.022143766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786633	2542568	2543448	279024	279868	SPAC1952.02	SPAC3H5.07	tma23	rpl702	SPAC1952.02	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.669973574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786634	2542568	2542943	279024	279384	SPAC1952.02	SPBC1348.03	tma23	SPBC1348.03	SPAC1952.02	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.988343269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786635	2542568	2543472	279024	279892	SPAC1952.02	SPAC959.04c	tma23	omh6	SPAC1952.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.301229632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786636	2542568	2540320	279024	276850	SPAC1952.02	SPBC3D6.04c	tma23	mad1	SPAC1952.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.146197436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786637	2543278	2542981	279706	279419	SPAPJ698.03c	SPAC824.02	prp12	bst1	sap130|SF3b130	SPAC824.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.071265997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786638	2543278	2539527	279706	276089	SPAPJ698.03c	SPCC338.16	prp12	pof3	sap130|SF3b130	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808026613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786639	2542540	2542378	278997	278842	SPAC19D5.06c	SPAC1805.04	din1	nup132	rai1	Nup133b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81299587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786640	2542540	2542177	278997	278652	SPAC19D5.06c	SPAC17H9.08	din1	SPAC17H9.08	rai1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.662628212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786641	2542540	2540930	278997	277446	SPAC19D5.06c	SPBC354.10	din1	def1	rai1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808642764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786642	2541147	2539147	277662	275719	SPBC651.05c	SPCC622.12c	dot2	gdh1	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382579031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786643	2541147	2541902	277662	278392	SPBC651.05c	SPAC27E2.07	dot2	pvg2	vps22	mug53	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.567961339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786644	2541147	2540131	277662	276668	SPBC651.05c	SPBC1778.05c	dot2	SPBC1778.05c	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.323424855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786645	2541147	2542237	277662	278709	SPBC651.05c	SPAC19E9.02	dot2	fin1	vps22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817039064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786646	2541147	2539068	277662	275640	SPBC651.05c	SPCC1442.11c	dot2	SPCC1442.11c	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329572236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786647	2541147	2542103	277662	278579	SPBC651.05c	SPAC31G5.11	dot2	pac2	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.690989578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786648	2541147	2539263	277662	275833	SPBC651.05c	SPCC895.09c	dot2	ucp12	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.214608856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786649	2541147	2543320	277662	279744	SPBC651.05c	SPAPJ695.01c	dot2	SPAPJ695.01c	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700460731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786650	2541147	2539226	277662	275796	SPBC651.05c	SPCC16C4.20c	dot2	SPCC16C4.20c	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.705155623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786651	2541147	2542468	277662	278929	SPBC651.05c	SPAC1D4.09c	dot2	rtf2	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635080325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786652	2541147	2538847	277662	275428	SPBC651.05c	SPCC594.06c	dot2	SPCC594.06c	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.547153858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786653	2541147	2542273	277662	278742	SPBC651.05c	SPAC17H9.13c	dot2	SPAC17H9.13c	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978976582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786654	2541147	2539463	277662	276026	SPBC651.05c	SPCC550.11	dot2	SPCC550.11	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.570628805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786655	2541147	2543681	277662	280095	SPBC651.05c	SPAC9.02c	dot2	SPAC9.02c	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.186321257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786656	2541147	2542724	277662	279175	SPBC651.05c	SPAC767.01c	dot2	vps1	vps22	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.437805628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786657	2541147	2539331	277662	275897	SPBC651.05c	SPCC24B10.09	dot2	rps1702	vps22	rps17|rps17-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817714224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786658	2541147	2541530	277662	278030	SPBC651.05c	SPAC57A10.10c	dot2	sla1	vps22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815415402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786659	2541147	2542318	277662	278784	SPBC651.05c	SPAC16C9.05	dot2	cph1	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.273204231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786660	2541147	2542969	277662	279409	SPBC651.05c	SPAC4G8.10	dot2	gos1	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.120052126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786661	2541147	2542277	277662	278746	SPBC651.05c	SPAC17A5.02c	dot2	dbr1	vps22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262041998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786662	2541147	2542220	277662	278694	SPBC651.05c	SPAC1A6.03c	dot2	SPAC1A6.03c	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446092829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786663	2541147	2542082	277662	278559	SPBC651.05c	SPAC29B12.10c	dot2	pgt1	vps22	opt1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384680645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786664	2541147	2538972	277662	275546	SPBC651.05c	SPCC1739.15	dot2	wtf21	vps22	wtf3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.212275482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786665	2541147	2539381	277662	275947	SPBC651.05c	SPCC1739.10	dot2	mug33	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844302172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786666	2541147	2542791	277662	279240	SPBC651.05c	SPAC167.04	dot2	pam17	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.327774213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786667	2541147	2542331	277662	278797	SPBC651.05c	SPAC1834.05	dot2	alg9	vps22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867056802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786668	2541147	2538821	277662	275402	SPBC651.05c	SPCC584.01c	dot2	SPCC584.01c	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.277106517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786669	2541147	2541545	277662	278045	SPBC651.05c	SPAC22F8.07c	dot2	rtf1	vps22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98548895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786670	2541147	2540396	277662	276924	SPBC651.05c	SPBC31F10.12	dot2	tma20	vps22	SPBC31F10.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462209609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786671	2541147	2541943	277662	278430	SPBC651.05c	SPAC222.07c	dot2	hri2	vps22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041176429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786672	2541147	2543396	277662	279818	SPBC651.05c	SPAC4D7.11	dot2	dsc4	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.605288493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786673	2541147	2541828	277662	278319	SPBC651.05c	SPAC22H12.05c	dot2	fsc1	vps22	SPAC22H12.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09085293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786674	2541147	2540256	277662	276787	SPBC651.05c	SPBC32F12.12c	dot2	SPBC32F12.12c	vps22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984146902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786675	2541147	2540290	277662	276821	SPBC651.05c	SPBC29A3.02c	dot2	his7	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.559058103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786676	2541147	2542976	277662	279414	SPBC651.05c	SPAC9E9.09c	dot2	atd1	vps22	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.357099043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786677	2541147	2543378	277662	279800	SPBC651.05c	SPAC3H8.07c	dot2	pac10	vps22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.558807904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786678	2541147	2543301	277662	279726	SPBC651.05c	SPAC977.17	dot2	SPAC977.17	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713008984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786679	2541147	2540184	277662	276717	SPBC651.05c	SPBC106.12c	dot2	SPBC106.12c	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328288489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786680	2541147	2542060	277662	278538	SPBC651.05c	SPAC23C11.14	dot2	zhf1	vps22	zhf	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.751062738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786681	2541147	2538884	277662	275462	SPBC651.05c	SPCC1393.08	dot2	SPCC1393.08	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708970546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786682	2541147	2539812	277662	276362	SPBC651.05c	SPBC1347.02	dot2	fkbp39	vps22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039985579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786683	2541147	2542869	277662	279314	SPBC651.05c	SPAC140.02	dot2	gar2	vps22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.275635076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786684	2541147	2542327	277662	278793	SPBC651.05c	SPAC16C9.06c	dot2	upf1	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32326827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786685	2541147	2541175	277662	277689	SPBC651.05c	SPBC839.13c	dot2	rpl1601	vps22	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045001722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786686	2541147	2542541	277662	278998	SPBC651.05c	SPAC1B3.03c	dot2	wis2	vps22	cyp5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378046246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786687	2541147	2543096	277662	279528	SPBC651.05c	SPAC977.05c	dot2	SPAC977.05c	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325803734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786688	2541147	2540531	277662	277059	SPBC651.05c	SPBC23E6.08	dot2	sat1	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.489706712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786689	2541147	2541432	277662	277937	SPBC651.05c	SPAC1F5.05c	dot2	mso1	vps22	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714625019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786690	2541147	2543066	277662	279499	SPBC651.05c	SPAC343.12	dot2	rds1	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323184177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786691	2541147	2543662	277662	280076	SPBC651.05c	SPAC9.07c	dot2	SPAC9.07c	vps22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819638254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786692	2541147	2541367	277662	277878	SPBC651.05c	SPBP8B7.13	dot2	vac7	vps22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.261168664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786693	2541147	2540699	277662	277223	SPBC651.05c	SPBC800.08	dot2	gcd10	vps22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043109731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786694	2541147	2542222	277662	278695	SPBC651.05c	SPAC31G5.18c	dot2	sde2	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.768784674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786695	2541147	2540516	277662	277044	SPBC651.05c	SPBC21C3.01c	dot2	vps13a	vps22	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.911460206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786696	2541147	2541757	277662	278251	SPBC651.05c	SPAC2F7.10	dot2	akr1	vps22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.516310986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786697	2541147	2539205	277662	275775	SPBC651.05c	SPCC4B3.15	dot2	mid1	vps22	dmf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.568493276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786698	2541147	2540551	277662	277078	SPBC651.05c	SPBC23E6.01c	dot2	cxr1	vps22	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575936522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786699	2541147	2539178	277662	275749	SPBC651.05c	SPCC1682.14	dot2	rpl1902	vps22	rpl19-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932817871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786700	2541147	2539253	277662	275823	SPBC651.05c	SPCC1827.03c	dot2	SPCC1827.03c	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049416243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786701	2541147	2542716	277662	279169	SPBC651.05c	SPAC25H1.07	dot2	emc1	vps22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099950594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786702	2541147	2543400	277662	279822	SPBC651.05c	SPAC3G9.11c	dot2	SPAC3G9.11c	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197310641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786703	2541147	2543384	277662	279806	SPBC651.05c	SPAC637.06	dot2	gmh5	vps22	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.486978578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786704	2541147	2543087	277662	279520	SPBC651.05c	SPAC30C2.04	dot2	SPAC30C2.04	vps22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.391716552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786705	2541147	2540314	277662	276844	SPBC651.05c	SPBC2G5.03	dot2	ctu1	vps22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094463649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786706	2541147	2542424	277662	278886	SPBC651.05c	SPAC1805.14	dot2	SPAC1805.14	vps22	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.403549889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786707	2541147	2543448	277662	279868	SPBC651.05c	SPAC3H5.07	dot2	rpl702	vps22	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.414126064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786708	2541147	2543624	277662	280038	SPBC651.05c	SPAC4D7.06c	dot2	SPAC4D7.06c	vps22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442399135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786709	2541147	2542943	277662	279384	SPBC651.05c	SPBC1348.03	dot2	SPBC1348.03	vps22	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634774085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786710	2541147	2540938	277662	277454	SPBC651.05c	SPBC365.14c	dot2	uge1	vps22	gal10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.261939115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786711	2541147	2540649	277662	277174	SPBC651.05c	SPBC19F8.08	dot2	rps401	vps22	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.336593323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786712	2540239	2539463	276771	276026	SPBC32H8.10	SPCC550.11	cdk9	SPCC550.11	SPACTOKYO_453.22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.50083481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786713	2540239	2539293	276771	275861	SPBC32H8.10	SPCC553.08c	cdk9	ria1	SPACTOKYO_453.22	SPCC553.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.978771236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786714	2540239	2539740	276771	276292	SPBC32H8.10	SPBC1685.04	cdk9	SPBC1685.04	SPACTOKYO_453.22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377778812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786715	2540239	2540687	276771	277212	SPBC32H8.10	SPBC21D10.08c	cdk9	SPBC21D10.08c	SPACTOKYO_453.22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.060022677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786716	2541806	2542207	278297	278682	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC17H9.10c	prz1	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.237366547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786717	2541806	2539147	278297	275719	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC622.12c	prz1	gdh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.069411661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786718	2541806	2539034	278297	275607	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC830.10	prz1	ham1	-	SPCC830.10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.251253913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786719	2541806	2542895	278297	279339	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC13G6.10c	prz1	asl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5697067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786720	2541806	2538796	278297	275377	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC63.06	prz1	SPCC63.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820021177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786721	2541806	2540060	278297	276598	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC106.01	prz1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.365787442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786722	2541806	2542577	278297	279033	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC19G12.15c	prz1	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.124208308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786723	2541806	2540105	278297	276642	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC106.04	prz1	ada1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633937475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786724	2541806	2542598	278297	279052	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC6G10.08	prz1	idp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.46070528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786725	2541806	2540885	278297	277402	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC660.14	prz1	mik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.518223877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786726	2541806	2542723	278297	279174	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC25H1.03	prz1	atg101	-	mug66	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.833215798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786727	2541806	2539949	278297	276493	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC1703.04	prz1	mlh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.553765548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786728	2541806	2540913	278297	277429	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC56F2.08c	prz1	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.235728417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786729	2541806	2540026	278297	276570	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC16D10.08c	prz1	hsp104	-	SPBC16D10.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.119192787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786730	2541806	2542812	278297	279259	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC6F6.01	prz1	cch1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925523802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786731	2541806	2539749	278297	276301	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC16A3.13	prz1	meu7	-	aah4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.571424599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786732	2541806	3361171	278297	280247	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBPB10D8.03	prz1	SPBPB10D8.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441816909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786733	2541806	2540901	278297	277417	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC4F6.16c	prz1	ero11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.865758926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786734	2541806	2539156	278297	275728	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC1450.08c	prz1	wtf16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.336969808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786735	2541806	2541552	278297	278051	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC1142.08	prz1	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.984666682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786736	2541806	2540524	278297	277052	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC21B10.08c	prz1	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.407806625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786737	2541806	2542358	278297	278823	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC1782.09c	prz1	clp1	-	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.324510288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786738	2541806	2540995	278297	277511	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC337.16	prz1	cho1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.853904227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786739	2541806	2541167	278297	277682	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC691.05c	prz1	SPBC691.05c	-	pi030|SPACTOKYO_453.04|SPBP22H7.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778942023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786740	2541806	2538896	278297	275474	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC584.11c	prz1	SPCC584.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.352832772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786741	2541806	2541135	278297	277650	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC839.03c	prz1	SPBC839.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.895391554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786742	2541806	2539930	278297	276474	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC1198.11c	prz1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.967585353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786743	2541806	2541787	278297	278279	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC2E12.03c	prz1	SPAC2E12.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.612208768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786744	2541806	3361561	278297	280637	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC11E3.01c	prz1	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.418379821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786745	2541806	2540068	278297	276606	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC1734.12c	prz1	alg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638704359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786746	2541806	2539939	278297	276483	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC11G11.01	prz1	fis1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.772037898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786747	2541806	2543559	278297	279975	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC664.04c	prz1	rps1602	-	rps16|rps16-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.641133047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786748	2541806	2541104	278297	277619	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC6B1.03c	prz1	SPBC6B1.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.125159713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786749	2541806	2541856	278297	278347	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC23H3.08c	prz1	bub3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152321465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786750	2541806	2541188	278297	277702	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC83.16c	prz1	SPBC83.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.568042217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786751	2541806	5802967	278297	858105	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC20G4.08	prz1	pdc1	-	SPAC20G4.08|SPAC4F10.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.122515613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786752	2541806	2540474	278297	277002	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC26H8.09c	prz1	snf59	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.922293338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786753	2541806	2540035	278297	276577	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC16A3.06	prz1	SPBC16A3.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.566235279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786754	2541806	2541733	278297	278227	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC27F1.03c	prz1	uch1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.773630204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786755	2541806	2543164	278297	279595	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC3G6.06c	prz1	rad2	-	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.009946843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786756	2541806	2539890	278297	276436	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC16C6.03c	prz1	SPBC16C6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.053165428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786757	2541806	2542701	278297	279154	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC26H5.05	prz1	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325929807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786758	2541806	2542040	278297	278521	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC212.01c	prz1	SPAC212.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778597766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786759	2541806	2538806	278297	275387	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC1840.09	prz1	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.832960863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786760	2541806	2539451	278297	276014	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC63.13	prz1	SPCC63.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515953688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786761	2541806	2543320	278297	279744	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAPJ695.01c	prz1	SPAPJ695.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.374666865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786762	2541806	2543098	278297	279530	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC4A8.06c	prz1	SPAC4A8.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45083374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786763	2541806	3361375	278297	280451	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC212.06c	prz1	SPAC212.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.720001442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786764	2541806	2542035	278297	278517	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAP8A3.04c	prz1	hsp9	-	scf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842444061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786765	2541806	2542677	278297	279130	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC26F1.10c	prz1	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.893268569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786766	2541806	2541013	278297	277528	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC3H7.13	prz1	far10	-	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.562664578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786767	2541806	2542273	278297	278742	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC17H9.13c	prz1	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.040179226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786768	2541806	2541994	278297	278478	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC26A3.14c	prz1	SPAC26A3.14c	-	SPAC23A6.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514843253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786769	2541806	2539463	278297	276026	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC550.11	prz1	SPCC550.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.821756481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786770	2541806	2543260	278297	279688	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC1002.17c	prz1	urg2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814524964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786771	2541806	2543681	278297	280095	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC9.02c	prz1	SPAC9.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.228062601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786772	2541806	2542696	278297	279149	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC29B12.03	prz1	spd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.615019556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786773	2541806	2542689	278297	279142	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC29B12.04	prz1	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.13665225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786774	2541806	2542724	278297	279175	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC767.01c	prz1	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645212692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786775	2541806	2539249	278297	275819	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC1450.05c	prz1	rox3	-	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.564911771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786776	2541806	2540919	278297	277435	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC543.07	prz1	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.131456668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786777	2541806	2540945	278297	277461	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC342.06c	prz1	rtt109	-	kat11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.671151032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786778	2541806	2539935	278297	276479	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC13G1.04c	prz1	abh1	-	SPBC13G1.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852860077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786779	2541806	2540306	278297	276836	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC2G5.02c	prz1	ckb2	-	SPBC2G5.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.006883997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786780	2541806	2539434	278297	275997	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC757.09c	prz1	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.700216579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786781	2541806	2543453	278297	279873	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC3G9.03	prz1	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.418009732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786782	2541806	2542555	278297	279012	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC1952.06c	prz1	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.49947144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786783	2541806	2540220	278297	276753	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC337.03	prz1	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.664091426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786784	2541806	2539575	278297	276135	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCP20C8.02c	prz1	SPCP20C8.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.092959035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786785	2541806	2541558	278297	278057	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC1F7.08	prz1	fio1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.510341234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786786	2541806	2543048	278297	279483	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC3F10.02c	prz1	trk1	-	sptrk	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.85291428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786787	2541806	2541761	278297	278255	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC7D4.12c	prz1	SPAC7D4.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.920950613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786788	2541806	2539302	278297	275870	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC126.09	prz1	zip2	-	SPCC126.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.850159666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786789	2541806	2541998	278297	278482	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC23A1.09	prz1	SPAC23A1.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931899339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786790	2541806	2540993	278297	277509	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC342.01c	prz1	alg6	-	SPBC3F6.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.119292585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786791	2541806	2542165	278297	278641	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC1782.08c	prz1	rex3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.192440493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786792	2541806	2541323	278297	277835	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBP35G2.14	prz1	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64133002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786793	2541806	2541560	278297	278059	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC24B11.12c	prz1	SPAC24B11.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.758122305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786794	2541806	2543685	278297	280099	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC3C7.03c	prz1	rad55	-	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.533316688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786795	2541806	2539441	278297	276004	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCPJ732.02c	prz1	xks1	-	SPCPJ732.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.891175669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786796	2541806	2542189	278297	278664	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC17A5.09c	prz1	glc9	-	SPAC17A5.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.314869226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786797	2541806	2539822	278297	276372	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC16G5.02c	prz1	SPBC16G5.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815564952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786798	2541806	2540663	278297	277188	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC56F2.06	prz1	mug147	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.437984715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786799	2541806	2539129	278297	275701	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC338.14	prz1	ado1	-	SPCC338.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.609055384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786800	2541806	2541311	278297	277823	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBP8B7.09c	prz1	los1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453102692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786801	2541806	2542246	278297	278716	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC17H9.12c	prz1	SPAC17H9.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.016719794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786802	2541806	2542644	278297	279098	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC24C9.16c	prz1	cox8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.264674339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786803	2541806	2543108	278297	279540	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC3A12.13c	prz1	SPAC3A12.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.061895171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786804	2541806	2543563	278297	279979	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC664.02c	prz1	arp8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.291242865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786805	2541806	2542530	278297	278988	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC1399.02	prz1	SPAC1399.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.131346228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786806	2541806	2542640	278297	279094	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC9E9.12c	prz1	ybt1	-	abc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.934713691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786807	2541806	2538972	278297	275546	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC1739.15	prz1	wtf21	-	wtf3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.631298269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786808	2541806	2539092	278297	275664	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC1259.08	prz1	SPCC1259.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446414183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786809	2541806	2542791	278297	279240	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC167.04	prz1	pam17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.772223099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786810	2541806	2541834	278297	278325	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC824.08	prz1	gda1	-	gdp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.598841502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786811	2541806	2540964	278297	277480	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC365.16	prz1	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513558202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786812	2541806	2542554	278297	279011	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC1952.03	prz1	otu2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.00680899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786813	2541806	2542331	278297	278797	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC1834.05	prz1	alg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509430073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786814	2541806	2543651	278297	280065	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC644.11c	prz1	pkp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.601318351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786815	2541806	2543573	278297	279988	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC869.11	prz1	cat1	-	SPAC922.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.836789163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786816	2541806	2541700	278297	278196	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC32A11.02c	prz1	SPAC32A11.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152520518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786817	2541806	2539032	278297	275605	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC4B3.05c	prz1	hem12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.458985606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786818	2541806	2542036	278297	278518	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC23A1.19c	prz1	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.799536584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786819	2541806	2539098	278297	275670	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC24B10.18	prz1	SPCC24B10.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.551298319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786820	2541806	2542311	278297	278777	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC16A10.05c	prz1	dad1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.998649445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786821	2541806	2540509	278297	277037	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC21H7.06c	prz1	opi10	-	SPBC21H7.06c|Hikeshi	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319791424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786822	2541806	2541664	278297	278160	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC2H10.01	prz1	SPAC2H10.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852837551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786823	2541806	2542596	278297	279050	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC1B3.17	prz1	clr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.400139544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786824	2541806	2539003	278297	275577	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC1442.17c	prz1	ist1	-	SPCC285.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638780691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786825	2541806	2540631	278297	277157	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC25B2.10	prz1	SPBC25B2.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.123252671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786826	2541806	2543102	278297	279534	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC31G5.21	prz1	SPAC31G5.21	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094668473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786827	2541806	2541250	278297	277764	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC8D2.17	prz1	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637398108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786828	2541806	2540892	278297	277408	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC530.01	prz1	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.679549047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786829	2541806	2541800	278297	278291	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC732.02c	prz1	SPAC732.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.590572987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786830	2541806	2542513	278297	278971	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC1952.05	prz1	gcn5	-	kat2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.768611219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786831	2541806	2542646	278297	279100	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC11H11.05c	prz1	fta6	-	sma6	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.50808885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786832	2541806	2541754	278297	278248	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC2E1P3.04	prz1	cao1	-	spao1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812629716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786833	2541806	2541784	278297	278277	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC2E1P3.01	prz1	SPAC2E1P3.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05366049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786834	2541806	2543144	278297	279576	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC3F10.05c	prz1	mug113	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040831889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786835	2541806	2543593	278297	280008	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC4G9.10	prz1	arg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.116970979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786836	2541806	2541982	278297	278467	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC23A1.06c	prz1	cmk2	-	mkp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.665044227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786837	2541806	2542707	278297	279160	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC25G10.03	prz1	zip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.331472367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786838	2541806	2539845	278297	276393	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC12C2.02c	prz1	ste20	-	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.004819844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786839	2541806	2541545	278297	278045	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC22F8.07c	prz1	rtf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.320539987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786840	2541806	2541160	278297	277675	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC725.09c	prz1	hob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.573250456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786841	2541806	2542776	278297	279225	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC167.01	prz1	ire1	-	ppk4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699156862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786842	2541806	2540348	278297	276877	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC29A10.05	prz1	exo1	-	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.947682113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786843	2541806	2540338	278297	276867	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC2G2.13c	prz1	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.171533201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786844	2541806	2542990	278297	279428	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC11D3.16c	prz1	SPAC11D3.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385549768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786845	2541806	2540352	278297	276881	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC215.03c	prz1	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.4787553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786846	2541806	2539733	278297	276285	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC16E9.12c	prz1	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.901834078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786847	2541806	2539898	278297	276444	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC12D12.07c	prz1	trx2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.063301415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786848	2541806	2542168	278297	278643	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC17A5.16	prz1	ftp105	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.698177243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786849	2541806	2542989	278297	279427	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC11E3.13c	prz1	gas5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.47441133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786850	2541806	2539044	278297	275617	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC338.11c	prz1	rrg1	-	uvi22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.55854322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786851	2541806	2543531	278297	279949	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC926.06c	prz1	SPAC926.06c	-	lrr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047955379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786852	2541806	2542873	278297	279318	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC9G1.02	prz1	wis4	-	wak1|wik1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.021572906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786853	2541806	2541109	278297	277624	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC6B1.02	prz1	ppk30	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.458117546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786854	2541806	2539999	278297	276543	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC1734.15	prz1	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.818279195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786855	2541806	2541496	278297	277998	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC23D3.09	prz1	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.137203001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786856	2541806	2542522	278297	278980	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC19A8.03	prz1	ymr1	-	SPAC19A8.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.732980081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786857	2541806	2541310	278297	277822	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBP18G5.03	prz1	toc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636046296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786858	2541806	2543643	278297	280057	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC3G9.07c	prz1	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992418015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786859	2541806	2540086	278297	276624	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC16H5.12c	prz1	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.696410361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786860	2541806	2543250	278297	279678	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC3G9.15c	prz1	fcf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.816124139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786861	2541806	2541710	278297	278205	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC343.11c	prz1	msc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.427880886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786862	2541806	2543406	278297	279828	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC9.12c	prz1	atp12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380400998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786863	2541806	2540326	278297	276856	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC2G5.06c	prz1	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.206572495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786864	2541806	2541824	278297	278315	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC27E2.02	prz1	SPAC27E2.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.466000498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786865	2541806	2541187	278297	277701	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC776.14	prz1	plh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513115395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786866	2541806	2542409	278297	278873	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC17G8.10c	prz1	dma1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.393148056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786867	2541806	2539667	278297	276222	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC13G1.08c	prz1	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.813447632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786868	2541806	2542032	278297	278514	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC23C11.04c	prz1	pnk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.075613837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786869	2541806	2540665	278297	277190	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC83.02c	prz1	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.562452518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786870	2541806	2542007	278297	278490	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC20H4.07	prz1	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503566685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786871	2541806	2538774	278297	275356	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC162.06c	prz1	SPCC162.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.251132454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786872	2541806	2543244	278297	279672	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC6B12.06c	prz1	rrg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.09140292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786873	2541806	2543389	278297	279811	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAPB1A11.02	prz1	SPAPB1A11.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.923736745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786874	2541806	2543367	278297	279789	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC3H1.10	prz1	pcs2	-	SPAC3H1.10|pcs	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041889489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786875	2541806	2542946	278297	279386	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC6F12.03c	prz1	fsv1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808564966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786876	2541806	2540751	278297	277273	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC20F10.10	prz1	psl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.510053432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786877	2541806	2539482	278297	276045	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC417.06c	prz1	mug27	-	ppk35|slk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.918622199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786878	2541806	2541542	278297	278042	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC4G9.02	prz1	rnh201	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.031744988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786879	2541806	2540232	278297	276764	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC336.10c	prz1	tif512	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.569562805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786880	2541806	2541241	278297	277755	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC887.17	prz1	SPBC887.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9194561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786881	2541806	2542867	278297	279312	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC343.16	prz1	lys2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.782128826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786882	2541806	2543301	278297	279726	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC977.17	prz1	SPAC977.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.90908909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786883	2541806	2542549	278297	279006	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC19A8.11c	prz1	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.125090447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786884	2541806	2543683	278297	280097	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAPB1E7.04c	prz1	SPAPB1E7.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775781802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786885	2541806	2543576	278297	279991	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC4A8.05c	prz1	myp2	-	myo3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.317469867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786886	2541806	2542437	278297	278899	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC17A5.01	prz1	pex6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442981707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786887	2541806	2542439	278297	278901	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC17A5.08	prz1	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.916370152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786888	2541806	2541536	278297	278036	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC1071.02	prz1	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.052210944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786889	2541806	2540342	278297	276871	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC2G2.01c	prz1	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.639267039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786890	2541806	2542267	278297	278736	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAPYUK71.03c	prz1	syn1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.266004219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786891	2541806	2539847	278297	276395	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC530.14c	prz1	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.743172314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786892	2541806	2542242	278297	278713	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC18G6.04c	prz1	shm2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.93180452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786893	2541806	2540184	278297	276717	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC106.12c	prz1	SPBC106.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.338114345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786894	2541806	2541296	278297	277808	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBP8B7.06	prz1	rpp201	-	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.38361868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786895	2541806	2539059	278297	275632	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC737.06c	prz1	SPCC737.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049619231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786896	2541806	2543390	278297	279812	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC631.01c	prz1	acp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462855643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786897	2541806	2541680	278297	278176	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC22F8.09	prz1	rrp16	-	nop53	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.616973529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786898	2541806	2542255	278297	278725	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC57A7.08	prz1	pzh1	-	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.054451065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786899	2541806	2543477	278297	279897	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAPB2B4.04c	prz1	SPAPB2B4.04c	-	pmc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.804469681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786900	2541806	2540005	278297	276549	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC1347.09	prz1	SPBC1347.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.490680554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786901	2541806	2542781	278297	279230	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC57A10.12c	prz1	ura3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.836305267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786902	2541806	2540930	278297	277446	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC354.10	prz1	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.389211743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786903	2541806	2540703	278297	277227	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC20F10.07	prz1	SPBC20F10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38201267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786904	2541806	2540589	278297	277115	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC20F10.06	prz1	mad2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.919676309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786905	2541806	3361526	278297	280602	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC664.15	prz1	caf4	-	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.66849022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786906	2541806	2540946	278297	277462	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC36.04	prz1	cys11	-	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.983261694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786907	2541806	2542869	278297	279314	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC140.02	prz1	gar2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.062481757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786908	2541806	2542673	278297	279126	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC26A3.11	prz1	SPAC26A3.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.471822639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786909	2541806	2542875	278297	279320	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC13G7.02c	prz1	ssa1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77303102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786910	2541806	2541713	278297	278208	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC3A12.12	prz1	atp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.559410582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786911	2541806	2542725	278297	279176	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC3A12.10	prz1	rpl2001	-	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.001241626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786912	2541806	2539932	278297	276476	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC13E7.07	prz1	SPBC13E7.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811614645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786913	2541806	2542806	278297	279254	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC1610.01	prz1	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504659202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786914	2541806	2543113	278297	279545	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC3F10.07c	prz1	erf4	-	mug91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.87267713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786915	2541806	2538907	278297	275484	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC24B10.19c	prz1	nts1	-	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.552014998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786916	2541806	2541222	278297	277736	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC887.08	prz1	SPBC887.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643159848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786917	2541806	2539453	278297	276016	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCPB1C11.03	prz1	SPCPB1C11.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.985059671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786918	2541806	2542759	278297	279209	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC9G1.07	prz1	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.882600022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786919	2541806	2538762	278297	275345	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC306.04c	prz1	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.759903892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786920	2541806	2541370	278297	277881	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBP8B7.07c	prz1	set6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.081892887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786921	2541806	2539809	278297	276359	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC16E9.02c	prz1	SPBC16E9.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.502675887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786922	2541806	2542769	278297	279219	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC15A10.10	prz1	mde6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.436436569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786923	2541806	2543051	278297	279486	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC1071.08	prz1	rpp203	-	rla6|rpp2-3|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454598965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786924	2541806	2543619	278297	280033	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC4F10.04	prz1	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318592451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786925	2541806	2540619	278297	277145	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC25H2.15	prz1	SPBC25H2.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513009102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786926	2541806	2542167	278297	278642	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC17C9.11c	prz1	SPAC17C9.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814455934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786927	2541806	2543071	278297	279504	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC3C7.06c	prz1	pit1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.091514459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786928	2541806	2541175	278297	277689	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC839.13c	prz1	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.394270085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786929	2541806	2539137	278297	275709	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC1682.08c	prz1	mcp2	-	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443796262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786930	2541806	2543191	278297	279620	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC3C7.05c	prz1	mug191	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.062313177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786931	2541806	2543567	278297	279983	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC890.03	prz1	ppk16	-	mug92	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.045800931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786932	2541806	2540498	278297	277026	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC27.02c	prz1	ask1	-	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991385213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786933	2541806	2543419	278297	279841	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAPB24D3.02c	prz1	SPAPB24D3.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.845066693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786934	2541806	2542881	278297	279326	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC13F5.03c	prz1	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.946259517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786935	2541806	2541973	278297	278458	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC6G9.13c	prz1	bqt1	-	mug23|rec26	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.54806869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786936	2541806	2539925	278297	276469	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC16H5.13	prz1	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.079850634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786937	2541806	2542515	278297	278973	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC1952.09c	prz1	SPAC1952.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.314504449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786938	2541806	2540800	278297	277319	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC409.20c	prz1	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.74200592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786939	2541806	2539770	278297	276321	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC1685.11	prz1	rlp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.661000535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786940	2541806	2543096	278297	279528	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC977.05c	prz1	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.004272537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786941	2541806	2541617	278297	278114	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC27D7.04	prz1	omt2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.77176584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786942	2541806	2540600	278297	277126	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC4.05	prz1	mlo2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.865752244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786943	2541806	2540725	278297	277248	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC215.14c	prz1	vps20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.624654361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786944	2541806	2539471	278297	276034	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC576.14	prz1	dph5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442526595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786945	2541806	2539816	278297	276366	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC12C2.04	prz1	SPBC12C2.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.62776171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786946	2541806	2540346	278297	276875	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC2F12.03c	prz1	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.344743949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786947	2541806	2539029	278297	275602	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC61.05	prz1	SPCC61.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.976505397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786948	2541806	2540829	278297	277347	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC800.09	prz1	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.094771542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786949	2541806	2540164	278297	276699	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC1683.03c	prz1	SPBC1683.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508990218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786950	2541806	2540677	278297	277202	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC21B10.03c	prz1	ath1	-	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.11483229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786951	2541806	2540211	278297	276744	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC947.15c	prz1	nde1	-	SPBC947.15c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.953157805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786952	2541806	2543437	278297	279857	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAPB1A10.14	prz1	pof15	-	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.44423946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786953	2541806	2542826	278297	279273	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC13G6.09	prz1	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.552430149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786954	2541806	2540569	278297	277096	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC660.17c	prz1	SPBC660.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325191285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786955	2541806	2539668	278297	276223	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC11B10.10c	prz1	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.902457279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786956	2541806	2541380	278297	277891	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBPB2B2.13	prz1	gal1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.819313276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786957	2541806	2541773	278297	278267	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC23H4.02	prz1	ppk9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.748946103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786958	2541806	2540516	278297	277044	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC21C3.01c	prz1	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.183939427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786959	2541806	2541789	278297	278281	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC23H4.08	prz1	iwr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.220574037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786960	2541806	2543420	278297	279842	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC3H1.04c	prz1	mdm31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.766452034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786961	2541806	2540297	278297	276828	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC24C6.08c	prz1	bhd1	-	bhd	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979466059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786962	2541806	2540202	278297	276735	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC16G5.09	prz1	SPBC16G5.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.118130477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786963	2541806	2540992	278297	277508	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC342.05	prz1	crb2	-	rhp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.944538223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786964	2541806	2541744	278297	278238	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC23A1.02c	prz1	SPAC23A1.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.050086959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786965	2541806	2541115	278297	277630	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC660.07	prz1	ntp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5948159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786966	2541806	2540555	278297	277082	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBP16F5.02	prz1	mcs2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.879880708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786967	2541806	2539207	278297	275777	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC285.09c	prz1	cgs2	-	pde1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389737782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786968	2541806	2540936	278297	277452	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC800.05c	prz1	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.078737934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786969	2541806	2542309	278297	278775	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC16A10.02	prz1	sub1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.112038737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786970	2541806	2539736	278297	276288	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC12C2.12c	prz1	glo1	-	SPBC21D10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329776317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786971	2541806	2539170	278297	275741	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC306.02c	prz1	SPCC306.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844137063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786972	2541806	2539920	278297	276464	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC119.08	prz1	pmk1	-	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.39348613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786973	2541806	2540551	278297	277078	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC23E6.01c	prz1	cxr1	-	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.416562382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786974	2541806	2539178	278297	275749	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC1682.14	prz1	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.33983017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786975	2541806	2541941	278297	278428	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC20H4.03c	prz1	tfs1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.343412821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786976	2541806	2543337	278297	279760	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC959.08	prz1	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714358606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786977	2541806	2542021	278297	278504	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAP14E8.02	prz1	tos4	-	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.398799568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786978	2541806	2543486	278297	279906	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC959.07	prz1	rps403	-	rps4|rps4-3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.004892597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786979	2541806	2540504	278297	277032	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC24C6.10c	prz1	dip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.258583518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786980	2541806	2539253	278297	275823	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC1827.03c	prz1	SPCC1827.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812497443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786981	2541806	2542716	278297	279169	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC25H1.07	prz1	emc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444995635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786982	2541806	2543400	278297	279822	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC3G9.11c	prz1	SPAC3G9.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.324470481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786983	2541806	2541357	278297	277868	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBPB7E8.01	prz1	SPBPB7E8.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.127507649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786984	2541806	2543384	278297	279806	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC637.06	prz1	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.198502749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786985	2541806	3361552	278297	280628	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC2E12.05	prz1	wtf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388573506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786986	2541806	2540766	278297	277286	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC19C2.02	prz1	pmt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.825450918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786987	2541806	2539128	278297	275700	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC1682.06	prz1	SPCC1682.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.257484294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786988	2541806	2540828	278297	277346	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC4B4.06	prz1	vps25	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321306702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786989	2541806	3361517	278297	280593	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAP11E10.02c	prz1	mam3	-	SPAPB1A10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452843027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786990	2541806	2543070	278297	279503	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC2H10.02c	prz1	SPAC2H10.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.51157443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786991	2541806	2542795	278297	279243	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC9G1.05	prz1	aip1	-	SPAC9G1.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377491569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786992	2541806	2542424	278297	278886	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC1805.14	prz1	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.268691247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786993	2541806	2539588	278297	276146	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC962.04	prz1	rps1201	-	rps12|rps12-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.744633072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786994	2541806	2541491	278297	277993	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC2C4.16c	prz1	rps801	-	rps8|rps8-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.681056477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786995	2541806	2543151	278297	279583	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC343.06c	prz1	SPAC343.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934462205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786996	2541806	2539220	278297	275790	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC297.05	prz1	SPCC297.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.142613028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786997	2541806	2543333	278297	279756	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC694.02	prz1	SPAC694.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.127879385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786998	2541806	2543090	278297	279523	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC1348.01	prz1	SPBC1348.01	-	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.506362725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
786999	2541806	2543448	278297	279868	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC3H5.07	prz1	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.473613463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787000	2541806	2542890	278297	279334	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC13G6.14	prz1	aps1	-	SPAC24B11.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.952665677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787001	2541806	2540383	278297	276912	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC31E1.02c	prz1	pmr1	-	cps5|pgak2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.604628299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787002	2541806	2542440	278297	278902	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC17A2.12	prz1	rrp1	-	SPAC17A2.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.328688312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787003	2541806	2543100	278297	279532	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC12B10.14c	prz1	tea5	-	ppk2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.135899027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787004	2541806	2542314	278297	278780	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC16E8.06c	prz1	nop12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.631086061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787005	2541806	2542087	278297	278564	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC26F1.02	prz1	pnn1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812733603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787006	2541806	2541732	278297	278226	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC22H10.08	prz1	SPAC22H10.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815721403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787007	2541806	2542094	278297	278571	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC29B12.06c	prz1	rcd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046413944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787008	2539473	2542382	276036	278846	SPCP25A2.02c	SPAC6G10.06	rhp26	SPAC6G10.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383513854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787009	2539473	2541208	276036	277722	SPCP25A2.02c	SPBC887.04c	rhp26	lub1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932741011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787010	2539473	2538801	276036	275382	SPCP25A2.02c	SPCC285.13c	rhp26	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.478199726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787011	2539473	2541021	276036	277536	SPCP25A2.02c	SPBC3B8.10c	rhp26	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.907810135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787012	2539473	2542036	276036	278518	SPCP25A2.02c	SPAC23A1.19c	rhp26	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.815327874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787013	2539473	2542420	276036	278883	SPCP25A2.02c	SPAC19D5.03	rhp26	cid1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923416489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787014	2539473	2539293	276036	275861	SPCP25A2.02c	SPCC553.08c	rhp26	ria1	-	SPCC553.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.596108574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787015	2539473	2543056	276036	279490	SPCP25A2.02c	SPAC3A11.04	rhp26	SPAC3A11.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390479209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787016	2539473	2541357	276036	277868	SPCP25A2.02c	SPBPB7E8.01	rhp26	SPBPB7E8.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642274747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787017	2539473	2543587	276036	280002	SPCP25A2.02c	SPAC4D7.02c	rhp26	SPAC4D7.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.908789389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787018	2539473	2543374	276036	279796	SPCP25A2.02c	SPAPB1A10.08	rhp26	SPAPB1A10.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453253816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787019	2541889	2541902	278379	278392	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC27E2.07	pom1	pvg2	-	mug53	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318765418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787020	2541889	2542598	278379	279052	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC6G10.08	pom1	idp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.440360316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787021	2541889	2541512	278379	278013	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC11E3.08c	pom1	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.940298971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787022	2541889	2542358	278379	278823	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC1782.09c	pom1	clp1	-	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.48979574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787023	2541889	2539930	278379	276474	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC1198.11c	pom1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.477447681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787024	2541889	3361561	278379	280637	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC11E3.01c	pom1	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.368929834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787025	2541889	2542650	278379	279104	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC2C4.10c	pom1	csc4	-	SPAC2C4.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32323866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787026	2541889	2542747	278379	279197	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC15A10.06	pom1	SPAC15A10.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326398411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787027	2541889	2539944	278379	276488	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC1198.06c	pom1	SPBC1198.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.512609524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787028	2541889	2540686	278379	277211	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC21D10.10	pom1	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.542944984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787029	2541889	2540455	278379	276983	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC215.05	pom1	gpd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.263916513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787030	2541889	2540560	278379	277087	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC2D10.14c	pom1	myo51	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.047456215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787031	2541889	2541013	278379	277528	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC3H7.13	pom1	far10	-	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.868360121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787032	2541889	2538847	278379	275428	SPAC2F7.03c	SPCC594.06c	pom1	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038905837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787033	2541889	2542273	278379	278742	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC17H9.13c	pom1	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.250670173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787034	2541889	2540029	278379	276573	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC16A3.01	pom1	spn3	-	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.017730183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787035	2541889	2540919	278379	277435	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC543.07	pom1	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.555016629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787036	2541889	2539434	278379	275997	SPAC2F7.03c	SPCC757.09c	pom1	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.285265297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787037	2541889	2540220	278379	276753	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC337.03	pom1	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.023432591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787038	2541889	2541119	278379	277634	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC651.11c	pom1	apm3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981584599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787039	2541889	2541761	278379	278255	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC7D4.12c	pom1	SPAC7D4.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.167159861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787040	2541889	2543029	278379	279465	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC11G7.01	pom1	SPAC11G7.01	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.413206608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787041	2541889	2542277	278379	278746	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC17A5.02c	pom1	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389269417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787042	2541889	2540595	278379	277121	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC21C3.02c	pom1	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.492440365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787043	2541889	2541428	278379	277933	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC14C4.11	pom1	SPAC14C4.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864379634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787044	2541889	2539175	278379	275746	SPAC2F7.03c	SPCC16C4.01	pom1	sif2	-	SPCC5E4.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632322056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787045	2541889	2539244	278379	275814	SPAC2F7.03c	SPCC1672.06c	pom1	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.065823171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787046	2541889	2543426	278379	279846	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC631.02	pom1	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.557676974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787047	2541889	2540415	278379	276943	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC30B4.06c	pom1	SPBC30B4.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990651134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787048	2541889	2542791	278379	279240	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC167.04	pom1	pam17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708248233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787049	2541889	2541021	278379	277536	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC3B8.10c	pom1	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.686251738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787050	2541889	2542331	278379	278797	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC1834.05	pom1	alg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.984491234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787051	2541889	2542568	278379	279024	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC1952.02	pom1	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.509767899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787052	2541889	2542239	278379	278711	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC18G6.02c	pom1	chp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446035328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787053	2541889	2539960	278379	276504	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC15D4.15	pom1	pho2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.920275573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787054	2541889	2539023	278379	275596	SPAC2F7.03c	SPCC594.05c	pom1	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.440731223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787055	2541889	2542679	278379	279132	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC12B10.07	pom1	acp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.139558027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787056	2541889	2540894	278379	277410	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC530.04	pom1	mod5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321876454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787057	2541889	2541776	278379	278270	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC23H3.05c	pom1	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.650093952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787058	2541889	2541093	278379	277608	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC646.08c	pom1	SPBC646.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503009844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787059	2541889	2541264	278379	277778	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC902.06	pom1	mto2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.439067387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787060	2541889	2539845	278379	276393	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC12C2.02c	pom1	ste20	-	ste16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.267699874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787061	2541889	2541545	278379	278045	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC22F8.07c	pom1	rtf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.633329646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787062	2541889	2542123	278379	278599	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC18G6.15	pom1	mal3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.479823209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787063	2541889	2539733	278379	276285	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC16E9.12c	pom1	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.732313256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787064	2541889	2542971	278379	279410	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC105.02c	pom1	SPAC105.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990446275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787065	2541889	2543667	278379	280081	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC4H3.02c	pom1	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509442823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787066	2541889	2539689	278379	276244	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC1861.03	pom1	mak10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872842716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787067	2541889	2541929	278379	278417	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC23C4.12	pom1	hhp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507718317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787068	2541889	2542193	278379	278668	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC9G1.11c	pom1	spn4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319778954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787069	2541889	2541710	278379	278205	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC343.11c	pom1	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.244285767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787070	2541889	2542126	278379	278602	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC1B3.05	pom1	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.005802003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787071	2541889	2539974	278379	276518	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC32H8.07	pom1	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382323307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787072	2541889	2541720	278379	278214	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC23H3.13c	pom1	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.329777479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787073	2541889	2542901	278379	279345	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC13F5.07c	pom1	SPAC13F5.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871021312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787074	2541889	2539958	278379	276502	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC1718.07c	pom1	zfs1	-	moc4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.983296334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787075	2541889	2541900	278379	278390	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC23H4.17c	pom1	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.609932487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787076	2541889	2540318	278379	276848	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC30B4.04c	pom1	sol1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.554863594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787077	2541889	2543576	278379	279991	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC4A8.05c	pom1	myp2	-	myo3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.605259883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787078	2541889	2541142	278379	277657	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC725.04	pom1	SPBC725.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513920224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787079	2541889	2541536	278379	278036	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC1071.02	pom1	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770015007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787080	2541889	2540342	278379	276871	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC2G2.01c	pom1	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767830654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787081	2541889	2540967	278379	277483	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC36B7.08c	pom1	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.542915857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787082	2541889	2539847	278379	276395	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC530.14c	pom1	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.357772076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787083	2541889	2540104	278379	276641	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC1709.16c	pom1	SPBC1709.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876779864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787084	2541889	2542773	278379	279222	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC16.01	pom1	rho2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.195454797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787085	2541889	2541283	278379	277796	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBP8B7.02	pom1	rng9	-	SPBP8B7.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.538854798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787086	2541889	2543390	278379	279812	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC631.01c	pom1	acp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.054130524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787087	2541889	2540533	278379	277061	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC29A10.16c	pom1	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.750139214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787088	2541889	2542329	278379	278795	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC9G1.10c	pom1	SPAC9G1.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.869169885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787089	2541889	2539538	278379	276100	SPAC2F7.03c	SPCC364.06	pom1	nap1	-	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.907008353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787090	2541889	2542283	278379	278751	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC27F1.08	pom1	pdt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994299121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787091	2541889	2540706	278379	277229	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC19C7.12c	pom1	omh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706925659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787092	2541889	2539160	278379	275732	SPAC2F7.03c	SPCC18.17c	pom1	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.162612837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787093	2541889	2538762	278379	275345	SPAC2F7.03c	SPCC306.04c	pom1	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.092582687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787094	2541889	2542619	278379	279073	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC6G10.02c	pom1	tea3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440520988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787095	2541889	2539101	278379	275673	SPAC2F7.03c	SPCC736.04c	pom1	gma12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.127853016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787096	2541889	2543619	278379	280033	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC4F10.04	pom1	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.584542359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787097	2541889	2543106	278379	279538	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC3A11.13	pom1	SPAC3A11.13	-	SPAC3H5.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991696894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787098	2541889	2542883	278379	279328	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC1486.04c	pom1	alm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.630756137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787099	2541889	2543304	278379	279728	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC6B12.12	pom1	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.199415991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787100	2541889	2541103	278379	277618	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC651.06	pom1	mug166	-	csa1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391968947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787101	2541889	2539707	278379	276260	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC17F3.01c	pom1	rga5	-	SPBC557.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.065183021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787102	2541889	3361193	278379	280269	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC19G7.18c	pom1	SPBC19G7.18c	-	SPBC19G7.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.380339258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787103	2541889	2541531	278379	278031	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC25A8.01c	pom1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.938771647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787104	2541889	2543427	278379	279847	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAPB1A10.15	pom1	arv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.376263207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787105	2541889	2539668	278379	276223	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC11B10.10c	pom1	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.906617229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787106	2541889	2541404	278379	277913	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBPB2B2.18	pom1	SPBPB2B2.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.755301922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787107	2541889	2540182	278379	276715	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC16G5.06	pom1	SPBC16G5.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.416490565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787108	2541889	2542891	278379	279335	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC6F12.12	pom1	par2	-	pbp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.750534489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787109	2541889	2540936	278379	277452	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC800.05c	pom1	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.009010442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787110	2541889	2539928	278379	276472	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC1604.08c	pom1	imp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.654018031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787111	2541889	2543516	278379	279934	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC4F10.11	pom1	spn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.664982422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787112	2541889	2540667	278379	277192	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC211.06	pom1	gfh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452247931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787113	2541889	2539920	278379	276464	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC119.08	pom1	pmk1	-	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.741123917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787114	2541889	2539189	278379	275760	SPAC2F7.03c	SPCC1682.16	pom1	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.417961343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787115	2541889	2540504	278379	277032	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC24C6.10c	pom1	dip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.026242624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787116	2541889	2542059	278379	278537	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC328.06	pom1	ubp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.244154839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787117	2541889	2543384	278379	279806	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC637.06	pom1	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641767663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787118	2541889	2539440	278379	276003	SPAC2F7.03c	SPCC550.08	pom1	SPCC550.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381514655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787119	2541889	2543372	278379	279794	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAPB1A10.09	pom1	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.310225348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787120	2541889	2539220	278379	275790	SPAC2F7.03c	SPCC297.05	pom1	SPCC297.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.200230472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787121	2541889	2540383	278379	276912	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC31E1.02c	pom1	pmr1	-	cps5|pgak2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.970222639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787122	2541889	2543100	278379	279532	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC12B10.14c	pom1	tea5	-	ppk2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632945282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787123	2541889	2543616	278379	280030	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC4A8.09c	pom1	cwf21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.624809355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787124	2541254	2542577	277768	279033	SPBC8D2.19	SPAC19G12.15c	mde3	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.190800358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787125	2541254	2538922	277768	275499	SPBC8D2.19	SPCC16C4.10	mde3	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.836517212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787126	2541254	2542969	277768	279409	SPBC8D2.19	SPAC4G8.10	mde3	gos1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634240539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787127	2541254	2540318	277768	276848	SPBC8D2.19	SPBC30B4.04c	mde3	sol1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.832195292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787128	2541254	2540342	277768	276871	SPBC8D2.19	SPBC2G2.01c	mde3	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931618339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787129	2541254	2542094	277768	278571	SPBC8D2.19	SPAC29B12.06c	mde3	rcd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.273291446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787130	2540473	2542862	277001	279308	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC140.03	tor1	arb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.698178731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787131	2540473	2540060	277001	276598	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC106.01	tor1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.719806103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787132	2540473	2540885	277001	277402	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC660.14	tor1	mik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.334913849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787133	2540473	2540956	277001	277472	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC409.06	tor1	uch2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.486042753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787134	2540473	2540994	277001	277510	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC337.11	tor1	SPBC337.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.90281756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787135	2540473	2540995	277001	277511	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC337.16	tor1	cho1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.288451947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787136	2540473	2540198	277001	276731	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC1709.04c	tor1	cyp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.439267187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787137	2540473	2539876	277001	276422	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC1734.07c	tor1	trs8502	-	SPBC1734.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.955916589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787138	2540473	2540068	277001	276606	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC1734.12c	tor1	alg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.488689316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787139	2540473	2541117	277001	277632	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC646.13	tor1	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.148028648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787140	2540473	2541345	277001	277856	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBP35G2.07	tor1	ilv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.481854714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787141	2540473	2541082	277001	277597	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC577.11	tor1	SPBC577.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.560900018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787142	2540473	2540826	277001	277344	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC409.17c	tor1	SPBC409.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.057923317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787143	2540473	2541951	277001	278438	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC222.05c	tor1	mss1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.911941015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787144	2540473	2540564	277001	277091	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC530.03c	tor1	bag102	-	bag1-b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570206816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787145	2540473	2541058	277001	277573	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC3H7.09	tor1	erf2	-	mug142	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.065323562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787146	2540473	2543590	277001	280005	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC4C5.03	tor1	SPAC4C5.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642956121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787147	2540473	2542724	277001	279175	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC767.01c	tor1	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.871557232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787148	2540473	2540313	277001	276843	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC337.04	tor1	ppk27	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.360963329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787149	2540473	2540220	277001	276753	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC337.03	tor1	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.979066816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787150	2540473	3361342	277001	280418	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC16D10.07c	tor1	sir2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322913503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787151	2540473	2541323	277001	277835	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBP35G2.14	tor1	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.515149975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787152	2540473	2541527	277001	278027	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC31A2.09c	tor1	apm4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.327971885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787153	2540473	2539721	277001	276274	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC146.04	tor1	SPBC146.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.759513951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787154	2540473	2542220	277001	278694	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC1A6.03c	tor1	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.870029273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787155	2540473	2539820	277001	276370	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC1709.13c	tor1	set10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.179900459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787156	2540473	2542082	277001	278559	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC29B12.10c	tor1	pgt1	-	opt1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.433967436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787157	2540473	2542230	277001	278703	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC1B3.06c	tor1	SPAC1B3.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.993864337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787158	2540473	2539381	277001	275947	SPBC30D10.10c	SPCC1739.10	tor1	mug33	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.681062521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787159	2540473	2540825	277001	277343	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC428.08c	tor1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.04412308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787160	2540473	2542331	277001	278797	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC1834.05	tor1	alg9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815077757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787161	2540473	2539051	277001	275624	SPBC30D10.10c	SPCC1183.11	tor1	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575620315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787162	2540473	2543020	277001	279456	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC10F6.13c	tor1	SPAC10F6.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.909377599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787163	2540473	2542177	277001	278652	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC17H9.08	tor1	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864764623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787164	2540473	2542596	277001	279050	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC1B3.17	tor1	clr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.198007899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787165	2540473	2539870	277001	276416	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC1709.18	tor1	tif452	-	SPBC409.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.510432727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787166	2540473	2539952	277001	276496	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC1709.14	tor1	SPBC1709.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.537684098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787167	2540473	2541353	277001	277864	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBP35G2.11c	tor1	SPBP35G2.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.640255847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787168	2540473	2540892	277001	277408	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC530.01	tor1	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.1465416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787169	2540473	2540903	277001	277419	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC530.05	tor1	prt1	-	SPBC530.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0071415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787170	2540473	2541093	277001	277608	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC646.08c	tor1	SPBC646.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.076076682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787171	2540473	2541288	277001	277801	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBP35G2.04c	tor1	SPBP35G2.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.413453643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787172	2540473	2539845	277001	276393	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC12C2.02c	tor1	ste20	-	ste16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.780677719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787173	2540473	2538770	277001	275353	SPBC30D10.10c	SPCC1753.02c	tor1	git3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.773906042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787174	2540473	2541160	277001	277675	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC725.09c	tor1	hob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.670464715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787175	2540473	2540922	277001	277438	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC36.10	tor1	SPBC36.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.141538054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787176	2540473	2542168	277001	278643	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC17A5.16	tor1	ftp105	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.988668032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787177	2540473	2539999	277001	276543	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC1734.15	tor1	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.208494912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787178	2540473	2541096	277001	277611	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC725.10	tor1	SPBC725.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.131939971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787179	2540473	2541183	277001	277697	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC725.14	tor1	arg6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647697892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787180	2540473	2539689	277001	276244	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC1861.03	tor1	mak10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.398703219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787181	2540473	2540772	277001	277292	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC216.04c	tor1	mxr2	-	SPBC216.04c|MsrB	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.217175842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787182	2540473	3361269	277001	280345	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC31A8.01c	tor1	rtn1	-	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.250231621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787183	2540473	2540176	277001	276709	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC1709.01	tor1	chs2	-	SPBC1734.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.962424441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787184	2540473	2540200	277001	276733	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC1709.06	tor1	dus2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.992956224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787185	2540473	2540194	277001	276727	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC1709.09	tor1	rrf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.267024575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787186	2540473	2542976	277001	279414	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC9E9.09c	tor1	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.803853542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787187	2540473	2541326	277001	277838	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBP35G2.03c	tor1	sgo1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.535859979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787188	2540473	2540371	277001	276900	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC36.11	tor1	SPBC36.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.692197631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787189	2540473	2541720	277001	278214	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC23H3.13c	tor1	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579987444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787190	2540473	2542549	277001	279006	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC19A8.11c	tor1	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.619100576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787191	2540473	2539027	277001	275600	SPBC30D10.10c	SPCC1322.08	tor1	srk1	-	mkp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779970033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787192	2540473	2539953	277001	276497	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC1709.11c	tor1	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.06994766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787193	2540473	2540094	277001	276632	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC146.10	tor1	mug57	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.157674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787194	2540473	2539611	277001	276169	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC1734.09	tor1	yea4	-	SPBC1734.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.122389021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787195	2540473	2541112	277001	277627	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC725.07	tor1	pex5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.845452005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787196	2540473	2540967	277001	277483	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC36B7.08c	tor1	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.340411582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787197	2540473	2542597	277001	279051	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAP8A3.07c	tor1	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783135765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787198	2540473	2539847	277001	276395	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC530.14c	tor1	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.329236931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787199	2540473	2540104	277001	276641	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC1709.16c	tor1	SPBC1709.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385931948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787200	2540473	2539427	277001	275992	SPBC30D10.10c	SPCC663.15c	tor1	SPCC663.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.753168316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787201	2540473	2541680	277001	278176	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC22F8.09	tor1	rrp16	-	nop53	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642222638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787202	2540473	2538690	277001	275275	SPBC30D10.10c	SPCC1393.05	tor1	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.696287289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787203	2540473	2540357	277001	276886	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC2F12.05c	tor1	SPBC2F12.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.562239365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787204	2540473	2541337	277001	277848	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBP35G2.13c	tor1	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.425549588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787205	2540473	2541378	277001	277889	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBP8B7.21	tor1	ubp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.397627804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787206	2540473	2539519	277001	276081	SPBC30D10.10c	SPCC364.05	tor1	vps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.512321281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787207	2540473	2538848	277001	275429	SPBC30D10.10c	SPCC613.12c	tor1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.372826499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787208	2540473	2540946	277001	277462	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC36.04	tor1	cys11	-	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377599891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787209	2540473	2540643	277001	277168	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC19G7.06	tor1	mbx1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.74100126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787210	2540473	2540821	277001	277339	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC800.03	tor1	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.549729446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787211	2540473	2541525	277001	278025	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC27D7.02c	tor1	SPAC27D7.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.692487893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787212	2540473	2540910	277001	277426	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC577.02	tor1	rpl3801	-	rpl38-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.499753012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787213	2540473	2542283	277001	278751	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC27F1.08	tor1	pdt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330033237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787214	2540473	2542806	277001	279254	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC1610.01	tor1	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579477704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787215	2540473	2543113	277001	279545	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC3F10.07c	tor1	erf4	-	mug91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.018943655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787216	2540473	2539686	277001	276241	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC1734.06	tor1	rhp18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.21784437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787217	2540473	2542759	277001	279209	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC9G1.07	tor1	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.146082202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787218	2540473	2543670	277001	280084	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAPB1E7.06c	tor1	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.973075111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787219	2540473	2539896	277001	276442	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC146.02	tor1	SPBC146.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.989161375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787220	2540473	2541909	277001	278399	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC227.01c	tor1	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446344593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787221	2540473	2542915	277001	279357	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC6C3.06c	tor1	SPAC6C3.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325782513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787222	2540473	2539925	277001	276469	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC16H5.13	tor1	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.838789529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787223	2540473	2540800	277001	277319	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC409.20c	tor1	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.916497728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787224	2540473	2540152	277001	276688	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC12C2.03c	tor1	SPBC12C2.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632319464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787225	2540473	2541100	277001	277615	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC651.04	tor1	SPBC651.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709353858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787226	2540473	2541432	277001	277937	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC1F5.05c	tor1	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.086112165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787227	2540473	2539239	277001	275809	SPBC30D10.10c	SPCC1020.10	tor1	oca2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643319483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787228	2540473	2540829	277001	277347	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC800.09	tor1	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.455589523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787229	2540473	2542418	277001	278881	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC1805.07c	tor1	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.062876496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787230	2540473	2539772	277001	276323	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC1734.05c	tor1	spf31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452513528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787231	2540473	2539722	277001	276275	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC14F5.11c	tor1	mug186	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.977840381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787232	2540473	2542826	277001	279273	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC13G6.09	tor1	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.006922728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787233	2540473	2540516	277001	277044	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC21C3.01c	tor1	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.927085385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787234	2540473	2541122	277001	277637	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC646.06c	tor1	agn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.694382579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787235	2540473	2542305	277001	278772	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC8C9.10c	tor1	rrp14	-	SPAC8C9.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.31801338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787236	2540473	2541757	277001	278251	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC2F7.10	tor1	akr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866810161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787237	2540473	2541356	277001	277867	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBP35G2.12	tor1	SPBP35G2.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.151064296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787238	2540473	2541244	277001	277758	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC8D2.02c	tor1	vps68	-	SPBC8D2.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.248741896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787239	2540473	3361511	277001	280587	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC23C4.08	tor1	rho3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.985712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787240	2540473	2539375	277001	275941	SPBC30D10.10c	SPCC4G3.11	tor1	mug154	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990679744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787241	2540473	2540551	277001	277078	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC23E6.01c	tor1	cxr1	-	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.957756408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787242	2540473	2541151	277001	277666	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC713.03	tor1	SPBC713.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.206308131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787243	2540473	2541238	277001	277752	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC8E4.05c	tor1	SPBC8E4.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703947019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787244	2540473	2541129	277001	277644	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC713.11c	tor1	pmp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.924619615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787245	2540473	2541806	277001	278297	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC4G8.13c	tor1	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.116758987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787246	2540473	2543387	277001	279809	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAPB1E7.02c	tor1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0056394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787247	2540473	2540070	277001	276608	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC119.04	tor1	mei3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.69026776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787248	2540473	2541029	277001	277544	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC409.10	tor1	ade7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578085202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787249	2540473	2541124	277001	277639	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC646.02	tor1	cwf11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.429730906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787250	2540473	2543472	277001	279892	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC959.04c	tor1	omh6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.472611941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787251	2540473	2540734	277001	277257	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC19G7.09	tor1	ulp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.338009329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787252	2540473	2539001	277001	275575	SPBC30D10.10c	SPCC1494.08c	tor1	SPCC1494.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.174481284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787253	2542736	2540686	279186	277211	SPAC25G10.02	SPBC21D10.10	cce1	bdc1	ydc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.125087127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787254	2542736	2540491	279186	277019	SPAC25G10.02	SPBC28E12.04	cce1	SPBC28E12.04	ydc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.143382543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787255	2542736	2540467	279186	276995	SPAC25G10.02	SPBC2G2.07c	cce1	mug178	ydc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.421761984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787256	2542736	2540797	279186	277316	SPAC25G10.02	SPBC18H10.11c	cce1	ppr2	ydc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933107988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787257	2542736	2539603	279186	276161	SPAC25G10.02	SPBC1289.06c	cce1	ppr8	ydc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.439006287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787258	2542736	2540533	279186	277061	SPAC25G10.02	SPBC29A10.16c	cce1	SPBC29A10.16c	ydc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.801364119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787259	2542736	2541488	279186	277990	SPAC25G10.02	SPAC227.17c	cce1	SPAC227.17c	ydc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.448277737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787260	2542736	2540930	279186	277446	SPAC25G10.02	SPBC354.10	cce1	def1	ydc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866363093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787261	2542736	2541742	279186	278236	SPAC25G10.02	SPAC22H10.09	cce1	SPAC22H10.09	ydc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.19010696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787262	2542736	3361389	279186	280465	SPAC25G10.02	SPAC977.13c	cce1	SPAC977.13c	ydc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567462247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787263	2542736	2538854	279186	275435	SPAC25G10.02	SPCP1E11.05c	cce1	are2	ydc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.257478542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787264	2540276	2540064	276807	276602	SPBC2A9.03	SPBC1718.02	SPBC2A9.03	hop1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.571075418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787265	2540276	2540451	276807	276979	SPBC2A9.03	SPBC2G2.17c	SPBC2A9.03	SPBC2G2.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392762701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787266	2542839	2538939	279285	275514	SPAC13G7.12c	SPCC1672.04c	SPAC13G7.12c	SPCC1672.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866194647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787267	2542839	2543152	279285	279584	SPAC13G7.12c	SPAC869.03c	SPAC13G7.12c	SPAC869.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037322916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787268	2542839	2540995	279285	277511	SPAC13G7.12c	SPBC337.16	SPAC13G7.12c	cho1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.632852682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787269	2542839	2539434	279285	275997	SPAC13G7.12c	SPCC757.09c	SPAC13G7.12c	rnc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984196542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787270	2542839	2543453	279285	279873	SPAC13G7.12c	SPAC3G9.03	SPAC13G7.12c	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381426959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787271	2542839	2542969	279285	279409	SPAC13G7.12c	SPAC4G8.10	SPAC13G7.12c	gos1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.132065127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787272	2542839	2542220	279285	278694	SPAC13G7.12c	SPAC1A6.03c	SPAC13G7.12c	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57391194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787273	2542839	2539051	279285	275624	SPAC13G7.12c	SPCC1183.11	SPAC13G7.12c	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.39083395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787274	2542839	2540403	279285	276931	SPAC13G7.12c	SPBC21D10.11c	SPAC13G7.12c	nfs1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925606465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787275	2542839	2540086	279285	276624	SPAC13G7.12c	SPBC16H5.12c	SPAC13G7.12c	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.623296893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787276	2542839	2543250	279285	279678	SPAC13G7.12c	SPAC3G9.15c	SPAC13G7.12c	fcf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379533729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787277	2542839	2540538	279285	277065	SPAC13G7.12c	SPBC26H8.03	SPAC13G7.12c	cho2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.674122371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787278	2542839	2540665	279285	277190	SPAC13G7.12c	SPBC83.02c	SPAC13G7.12c	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.051960361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787279	2542839	2540836	279285	277354	SPAC13G7.12c	SPBC18H10.19	SPAC13G7.12c	vps38	-	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378272952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787280	2542839	2541241	279285	277755	SPAC13G7.12c	SPBC887.17	SPAC13G7.12c	SPBC887.17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.41363884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787281	2542839	2541464	279285	277966	SPAC13G7.12c	SPAC222.08c	SPAC13G7.12c	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869394132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787282	2542839	2542597	279285	279051	SPAC13G7.12c	SPAP8A3.07c	SPAC13G7.12c	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262826216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787283	2542839	2540229	279285	276761	SPAC13G7.12c	SPBC31F10.15c	SPAC13G7.12c	atp15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820575988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787284	2542839	2541488	279285	277990	SPAC13G7.12c	SPAC227.17c	SPAC13G7.12c	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.977118355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787285	2542839	2540001	279285	276545	SPAC13G7.12c	SPBC1289.13c	SPAC13G7.12c	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.192505014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787286	2542839	2540998	279285	277514	SPAC13G7.12c	SPBC3D6.05	SPAC13G7.12c	ptp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.124953557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787287	2542839	2542940	279285	279381	SPAC13G7.12c	SPAC31A2.12	SPAC13G7.12c	SPAC31A2.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.142950724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787288	2542839	2540677	279285	277202	SPAC13G7.12c	SPBC21B10.03c	SPAC13G7.12c	ath1	-	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.196114462	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787289	2542839	2541757	279285	278251	SPAC13G7.12c	SPAC2F7.10	SPAC13G7.12c	akr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983610925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787290	2542839	2539768	279285	276319	SPAC13G7.12c	SPBC1703.09	SPAC13G7.12c	SPBC1703.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870298507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787291	2542839	2541478	279285	277980	SPAC13G7.12c	SPAC2F7.17	SPAC13G7.12c	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.713491709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787292	2542839	2542460	279285	278921	SPAC13G7.12c	SPAC1F12.03c	SPAC13G7.12c	SPAC1F12.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869099674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787293	2542839	2540734	279285	277257	SPAC13G7.12c	SPBC19G7.09	SPAC13G7.12c	ulp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445929398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787294	2540453	2542555	276981	279012	SPBC19C2.08	SPAC1952.06c	prp38	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.631287873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787295	2540453	2539792	276981	276342	SPBC19C2.08	SPBC1271.14	prp38	SPBC1271.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.455410297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787296	2540453	2543593	276981	280008	SPBC19C2.08	SPAC4G9.10	prp38	arg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.562612716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787297	2540453	2541183	276981	277697	SPBC19C2.08	SPBC725.14	prp38	arg6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329051926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787298	2540730	2540161	277253	276696	SPBC19C2.09	SPBC13E7.03c	sre1	SPBC13E7.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.660625866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787299	2540730	2542273	277253	278742	SPBC19C2.09	SPAC17H9.13c	sre1	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.057637059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787300	2540730	2541500	277253	278002	SPBC19C2.09	SPAC227.18	sre1	lys3	-	SPAC2F7.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852207566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787301	2540730	2541038	277253	277553	SPBC19C2.09	SPBC29A10.01	sre1	ccr1	-	SPBC365.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.040286627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787302	2540730	2541183	277253	277697	SPBC19C2.09	SPBC725.14	sre1	arg6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.137778813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787303	2540730	2539815	277253	276365	SPBC19C2.09	SPBC1105.02c	sre1	lys4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.828073814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787304	2540730	2543096	277253	279528	SPBC19C2.09	SPAC977.05c	sre1	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387749812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787305	2539812	2542207	276362	278682	SPBC1347.02	SPAC17H9.10c	fkbp39	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.349593628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787306	2539812	2539050	276362	275623	SPBC1347.02	SPCC11E10.08	fkbp39	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.997839471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787307	2539812	2542862	276362	279308	SPBC1347.02	SPAC140.03	fkbp39	arb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.978107015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787308	2539812	2543617	276362	280031	SPBC1347.02	SPAC4A8.10	fkbp39	SPAC4A8.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867333117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787309	2539812	2541512	276362	278013	SPBC1347.02	SPAC11E3.08c	fkbp39	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.140732551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787310	2539812	2540528	276362	277056	SPBC1347.02	SPBC18H10.04c	fkbp39	sce3	-	tif48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.27276276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787311	2539812	2538896	276362	275474	SPBC1347.02	SPCC584.11c	fkbp39	SPCC584.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.06309375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787312	2539812	2539930	276362	276474	SPBC1347.02	SPBC1198.11c	fkbp39	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440399552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787313	2539812	2542650	276362	279104	SPBC1347.02	SPAC2C4.10c	fkbp39	csc4	-	SPAC2C4.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095198969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787314	2539812	2541188	276362	277702	SPBC1347.02	SPBC83.16c	fkbp39	SPBC83.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570631309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787315	2539812	2541633	276362	278129	SPBC1347.02	SPAC664.01c	fkbp39	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.709050451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787316	2539812	2543432	276362	279852	SPBC1347.02	SPAC4G8.05	fkbp39	ppk14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.516750316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787317	2539812	2542071	276362	278548	SPBC1347.02	SPAC26H5.03	fkbp39	pcf2	-	cac2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.123397916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787318	2539812	2540579	276362	277105	SPBC1347.02	SPBC28E12.02	fkbp39	SPBC28E12.02	-	SPBC9B6.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.51258691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787319	2539812	3361375	276362	280451	SPBC1347.02	SPAC212.06c	fkbp39	SPAC212.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319850214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787320	2539812	2539420	276362	275985	SPBC1347.02	SPCC970.07c	fkbp39	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.324639951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787321	2539812	2542677	276362	279130	SPBC1347.02	SPAC26F1.10c	fkbp39	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.82131337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787322	2539812	2541013	276362	277528	SPBC1347.02	SPBC3H7.13	fkbp39	far10	-	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.821441086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787323	2539812	2540979	276362	277495	SPBC1347.02	SPBC3H7.10	fkbp39	elp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.612885125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787324	2539812	2542273	276362	278742	SPBC1347.02	SPAC17H9.13c	fkbp39	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.054216139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787325	2539812	2542816	276362	279263	SPBC1347.02	SPAC4G8.11c	fkbp39	atp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.318601263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787326	2539812	2543043	276362	279478	SPBC1347.02	SPAC3F10.13	fkbp39	ucp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.821691379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787327	2539812	2540306	276362	276836	SPBC1347.02	SPBC2G5.02c	fkbp39	ckb2	-	SPBC2G5.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.050956033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787328	2539812	2539988	276362	276532	SPBC1347.02	SPBC1271.05c	fkbp39	SPBC1271.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871049834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787329	2539812	2540727	276362	277250	SPBC1347.02	SPBC1921.03c	fkbp39	mex67	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.568780018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787330	2539812	2541323	276362	277835	SPBC1347.02	SPBP35G2.14	fkbp39	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.985860916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787331	2539812	2540425	276362	276953	SPBC1347.02	SPBC27.06c	fkbp39	mgr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095262925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787332	2539812	2543685	276362	280099	SPBC1347.02	SPAC3C7.03c	fkbp39	rad55	-	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.011305529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787333	2539812	2541643	276362	278139	SPBC1347.02	SPAC14C4.13	fkbp39	rad17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.033241823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787334	2539812	2543563	276362	279979	SPBC1347.02	SPAC664.02c	fkbp39	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.011585265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787335	2539812	2539100	276362	275672	SPBC1347.02	SPCC330.12c	fkbp39	sdh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.184666354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787336	2539812	2540825	276362	277343	SPBC1347.02	SPBC428.08c	fkbp39	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.38463724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787337	2539812	2541926	276362	278414	SPBC1347.02	SPAC222.14c	fkbp39	SPAC222.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.491823887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787338	2539812	2542239	276362	278711	SPBC1347.02	SPAC18G6.02c	fkbp39	chp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.835199286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787339	2539812	2540834	276362	277352	SPBC1347.02	SPBC18H10.18c	fkbp39	SPBC18H10.18c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042221075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787340	2539812	2542896	276362	279340	SPBC1347.02	SPAC3F10.04	fkbp39	gsa1	-	gsh2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.505770893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787341	2539812	2542950	276362	279390	SPBC1347.02	SPAC12B10.03	fkbp39	bun62	-	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.622349938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787342	2539812	2541093	276362	277608	SPBC1347.02	SPBC646.08c	fkbp39	SPBC646.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923445015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787343	2539812	2543593	276362	280008	SPBC1347.02	SPAC4G9.10	fkbp39	arg3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926972038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787344	2539812	3361560	276362	280636	SPBC1347.02	SPAC14C4.09	fkbp39	agn1	-	SPAC14C4.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.400381006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787345	2539812	2542544	276362	279001	SPBC1347.02	SPAC18G6.10	fkbp39	lem2	-	heh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580627751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787346	2539812	2539733	276362	276285	SPBC1347.02	SPBC16E9.12c	fkbp39	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.369235308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787347	2539812	2540673	276362	277198	SPBC1347.02	SPBC1D7.03	fkbp39	mug80	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.423121932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787348	2539812	2539073	276362	275645	SPBC1347.02	SPCC1322.02	fkbp39	pxd1	-	SPCC1322.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.858178718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787349	2539812	2541496	276362	277998	SPBC1347.02	SPAC23D3.09	fkbp39	arp42	-	arp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.114426325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787350	2539812	2541310	276362	277822	SPBC1347.02	SPBP18G5.03	fkbp39	toc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.162050862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787351	2539812	2541739	276362	278233	SPBC1347.02	SPAC2G11.10c	fkbp39	SPAC2G11.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931752483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787352	2539812	2539995	276362	276539	SPBC1347.02	SPBC1105.09	fkbp39	ubc15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328988428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787353	2539812	2542409	276362	278873	SPBC1347.02	SPAC17G8.10c	fkbp39	dma1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.854857549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787354	2539812	2542126	276362	278602	SPBC1347.02	SPAC1B3.05	fkbp39	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851630428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787355	2539812	2542007	276362	278490	SPBC1347.02	SPAC20H4.07	fkbp39	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.210909015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787356	2539812	2540224	276362	276757	SPBC1347.02	SPBC32H8.06	fkbp39	mug93	-	pi018|SPACTOKYO_453.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330872052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787357	2539812	2543301	276362	279726	SPBC1347.02	SPAC977.17	fkbp39	SPAC977.17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817775757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787358	2539812	2539953	276362	276497	SPBC1347.02	SPBC1709.11c	fkbp39	png2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.711835251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787359	2539812	2539847	276362	276395	SPBC1347.02	SPBC530.14c	fkbp39	dsk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.475386968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787360	2539812	2540599	276362	277125	SPBC1347.02	SPBC29A3.10c	fkbp39	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.058384231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787361	2539812	2539427	276362	275992	SPBC1347.02	SPCC663.15c	fkbp39	SPCC663.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386858973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787362	2539812	2540844	276362	277361	SPBC1347.02	SPBC1921.04c	fkbp39	SPBC1921.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462576569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787363	2539812	2538690	276362	275275	SPBC1347.02	SPCC1393.05	fkbp39	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.541918563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787364	2539812	2541746	276362	278240	SPBC1347.02	SPAC20G4.04c	fkbp39	hus1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.721324809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787365	2539812	2542781	276362	279230	SPBC1347.02	SPAC57A10.12c	fkbp39	ura3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329388037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787366	2539812	2542748	276362	279198	SPBC1347.02	SPAC15A10.09c	fkbp39	pun1	-	SPAC15A10.09c|sur7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.005378425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787367	2539812	2541963	276362	278449	SPBC1347.02	SPAC21E11.04	fkbp39	aca1	-	ppr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.917481232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787368	2539812	2538848	276362	275429	SPBC1347.02	SPCC613.12c	fkbp39	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.989230395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787369	2539812	2541017	276362	277532	SPBC1347.02	SPBC36.07	fkbp39	elp1	-	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.458749703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787370	2539812	2542869	276362	279314	SPBC1347.02	SPAC140.02	fkbp39	gar2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.408326388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787371	2539812	2539538	276362	276100	SPBC1347.02	SPCC364.06	fkbp39	nap1	-	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.353803999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787372	2539812	2542198	276362	278673	SPBC1347.02	SPAC6F12.09	fkbp39	rdp1	-	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.641142647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787373	2539812	2539160	276362	275732	SPBC1347.02	SPCC18.17c	fkbp39	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708952845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787374	2539812	2541786	276362	278278	SPBC1347.02	SPAC22F3.08c	fkbp39	rok1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.80330292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787375	2539812	2540498	276362	277026	SPBC1347.02	SPBC27.02c	fkbp39	ask1	-	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.610389388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787376	2539812	2542881	276362	279326	SPBC1347.02	SPAC13F5.03c	fkbp39	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.41044508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787377	2539812	2542915	276362	279357	SPBC1347.02	SPAC6C3.06c	fkbp39	SPAC6C3.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.33617206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787378	2539812	2539925	276362	276469	SPBC1347.02	SPBC16H5.13	fkbp39	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.524115563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787379	2539812	2539030	276362	275603	SPBC1347.02	SPCP1E11.02	fkbp39	ppk38	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093100081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787380	2539812	2542515	276362	278973	SPBC1347.02	SPAC1952.09c	fkbp39	SPAC1952.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.436273453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787381	2539812	2543304	276362	279728	SPBC1347.02	SPAC6B12.12	fkbp39	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.431210464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787382	2539812	2539246	276362	275816	SPBC1347.02	SPCC18.13	fkbp39	SPCC18.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.929489141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787383	2539812	2541459	276362	277961	SPBC1347.02	SPAC227.11c	fkbp39	SPAC227.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844418103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787384	2539812	2541531	276362	278031	SPBC1347.02	SPAC25A8.01c	fkbp39	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.361377697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787385	2539812	2540891	276362	277407	SPBC1347.02	SPBC582.08	fkbp39	SPBC582.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991592139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787386	2539812	2539136	276362	275708	SPBC1347.02	SPCC1919.05	fkbp39	SPCC1919.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.673561734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787387	2539812	2542418	276362	278881	SPBC1347.02	SPAC1805.07c	fkbp39	dad2	-	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.690412522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787388	2539812	2541789	276362	278281	SPBC1347.02	SPAC23H4.08	fkbp39	iwr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.45414883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787389	2539812	2543633	276362	280047	SPBC1347.02	SPAC3H8.05c	fkbp39	mms1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381973314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787390	2539812	2541790	276362	278282	SPBC1347.02	SPAC139.02c	fkbp39	oac1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388564638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787391	2539812	2539375	276362	275941	SPBC1347.02	SPCC4G3.11	fkbp39	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.208354415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787392	2539812	2539901	276362	276447	SPBC1347.02	SPBC17A3.08	fkbp39	SPBC17A3.08	-	pi038	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.917116649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787393	2539812	2541941	276362	278428	SPBC1347.02	SPAC20H4.03c	fkbp39	tfs1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.486348477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787394	2539812	2542021	276362	278504	SPBC1347.02	SPAP14E8.02	fkbp39	tos4	-	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.107337086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787395	2539812	2543327	276362	279750	SPBC1347.02	SPAC1D4.06c	fkbp39	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.047175942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787396	2539812	2543446	276362	279866	SPBC1347.02	SPAC4F8.10c	fkbp39	stg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.646700742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787397	2539812	2542886	276362	279331	SPBC1347.02	SPAC1486.01	fkbp39	SPAC1486.01	-	sod2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449835713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787398	2539812	2539583	276362	276142	SPBC1347.02	SPCC777.04	fkbp39	SPCC777.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447973546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787399	2539812	2543372	276362	279794	SPBC1347.02	SPAPB1A10.09	fkbp39	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.263422995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787400	2539812	2540208	276362	276741	SPBC1347.02	SPBC9B6.03	fkbp39	SPBC9B6.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149058698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787401	2539352	2541013	275918	277528	SPCC188.07	SPBC3H7.13	ccq1	far10	-	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388412291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787402	2539352	2539045	275918	275618	SPCC188.07	SPCC1235.05c	ccq1	fft2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.373215511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787403	2539352	2539434	275918	275997	SPCC188.07	SPCC757.09c	ccq1	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.394960925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787404	2539352	2540929	275918	277445	SPCC188.07	SPBC354.03	ccq1	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.953376851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787405	2539352	2541045	275918	277560	SPCC188.07	SPBC543.03c	ccq1	pku80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.293657378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787406	2539352	2543685	275918	280099	SPCC188.07	SPAC3C7.03c	ccq1	rad55	-	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.90847681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787407	2539352	2540825	275918	277343	SPCC188.07	SPBC428.08c	ccq1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.367591724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787408	2539352	2541926	275918	278414	SPCC188.07	SPAC222.14c	ccq1	SPAC222.14c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.885742549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787409	2539352	2539023	275918	275596	SPCC188.07	SPCC594.05c	ccq1	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.536646976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787410	2539352	2541776	275918	278270	SPCC188.07	SPAC23H3.05c	ccq1	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.70639348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787411	2539352	2541496	275918	277998	SPCC188.07	SPAC23D3.09	ccq1	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.400228328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787412	2539352	2543643	275918	280057	SPCC188.07	SPAC3G9.07c	ccq1	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.900162334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787413	2539352	2541899	275918	278389	SPCC188.07	SPAC22E12.11c	ccq1	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.187899073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787414	2539352	2539667	275918	276222	SPCC188.07	SPBC13G1.08c	ccq1	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.340136607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787415	2539352	2542007	275918	278490	SPCC188.07	SPAC20H4.07	ccq1	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.613830318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787416	2539352	2541720	275918	278214	SPCC188.07	SPAC23H3.13c	ccq1	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.362703707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787417	2539352	2540077	275918	276615	SPCC188.07	SPBC17D11.04c	ccq1	nto1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.209047225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787418	2539352	2541900	275918	278390	SPCC188.07	SPAC23H4.17c	ccq1	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.888493176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787419	2539352	2538690	275918	275275	SPCC188.07	SPCC1393.05	ccq1	ers1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871916943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787420	2539352	2541488	275918	277990	SPCC188.07	SPAC227.17c	ccq1	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.846309546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787421	2539352	2538848	275918	275429	SPCC188.07	SPCC613.12c	ccq1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.409191227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787422	2539352	2542806	275918	279254	SPCC188.07	SPAC1610.01	ccq1	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.065230324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787423	2539352	2538762	275918	275345	SPCC188.07	SPCC306.04c	ccq1	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.435033712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787424	2539352	2543106	275918	279538	SPCC188.07	SPAC3A11.13	ccq1	SPAC3A11.13	-	SPAC3H5.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.432126209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787425	2539352	2539925	275918	276469	SPCC188.07	SPBC16H5.13	ccq1	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445655877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787426	2539352	2541531	275918	278031	SPCC188.07	SPAC25A8.01c	ccq1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.004500863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787427	2539352	2540346	275918	276875	SPCC188.07	SPBC2F12.03c	ccq1	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.529542152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787428	2539352	2540555	275918	277082	SPCC188.07	SPBP16F5.02	ccq1	mcs2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.484641091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787429	2539352	2539375	275918	275941	SPCC188.07	SPCC4G3.11	ccq1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.081465425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787430	2539352	2542244	275918	278714	SPCC188.07	SPAC19G12.13c	ccq1	poz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.67402156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787431	2539352	2543372	275918	279794	SPCC188.07	SPAPB1A10.09	ccq1	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.775475381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787432	2543478	2540556	279898	277083	SPAC688.06c	SPBC19F8.04c	slx4	lcl3	-	SPBC19F8.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194462702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787433	2543478	2538721	279898	275305	SPAC688.06c	SPCC1494.10	slx4	adn3	-	SPCC70.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.927568513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787434	2543478	2541826	279898	278317	SPAC688.06c	SPAC2G11.13	slx4	atg22	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.758405398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787435	2543478	2543287	279898	279712	SPAC688.06c	SPAC9E9.05	slx4	SPAC9E9.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817673394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787436	2543478	2539167	279898	275738	SPAC688.06c	SPCC1281.08	slx4	wtf11	-	meu24	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.229276225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787437	2543478	2540653	279898	277178	SPAC688.06c	SPBC215.07c	slx4	SPBC215.07c	-	pdp2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.921584602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787438	2543478	2542928	279898	279369	SPAC688.06c	SPAC1142.06	slx4	get3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.323767206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787439	2543478	2539301	279898	275869	SPAC688.06c	SPCC622.03c	slx4	SPCC622.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.877816688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787440	2543478	2543524	279898	279942	SPAC688.06c	SPAC4D7.07c	slx4	csi2	-	SPAC4D7.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.206199353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787441	2543478	2539282	279898	275850	SPAC688.06c	SPCC622.06c	slx4	SPCC622.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.459473857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787442	2543478	2543578	279898	279993	SPAC688.06c	SPAC9.10	slx4	thi9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926726445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787443	2543478	2538896	279898	275474	SPAC688.06c	SPCC584.11c	slx4	SPCC584.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319287142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787444	2543478	2539202	279898	275773	SPAC688.06c	SPCC162.10	slx4	ppk33	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.410433338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787445	2543478	2540068	279898	276606	SPAC688.06c	SPBC1734.12c	slx4	alg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.008100143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787446	2543478	2543432	279898	279852	SPAC688.06c	SPAC4G8.05	slx4	ppk14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816037172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787447	2543478	2540402	279898	276930	SPAC688.06c	SPBC30D10.05c	slx4	SPBC30D10.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038692318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787448	2543478	2539800	279898	276350	SPAC688.06c	SPBC1347.13c	slx4	mrm1	-	SPBC1347.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.508543158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787449	2543478	2539028	279898	275601	SPAC688.06c	SPCC1281.07c	slx4	SPCC1281.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.385076328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787450	2543478	2538806	279898	275387	SPAC688.06c	SPCC1840.09	slx4	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707899017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787451	2543478	2541235	279898	277749	SPAC688.06c	SPBC8D2.12c	slx4	SPBC8D2.12c	-	pI053	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19794697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787452	2543478	2540975	279898	277491	SPAC688.06c	SPBC354.12	slx4	gpd3	-	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.331067749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787453	2543478	2541214	279898	277728	SPAC688.06c	SPBC839.07	slx4	ibp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.869629477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787454	2543478	2541205	279898	277719	SPAC688.06c	SPBC839.02	slx4	SPBC839.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990074259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787455	2543478	2539443	279898	276006	SPAC688.06c	SPCC736.02	slx4	SPCC736.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194686383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787456	2543478	2542323	279898	278789	SPAC688.06c	SPAC9E9.15	slx4	SPAC9E9.15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816951646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787457	2543478	2543681	279898	280095	SPAC688.06c	SPAC9.02c	slx4	SPAC9.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771990479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787458	2543478	2542696	279898	279149	SPAC688.06c	SPAC29B12.03	slx4	spd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201757278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787459	2543478	3361381	279898	280457	SPAC688.06c	SPAC12G12.01c	slx4	SPAC12G12.01c	-	SPAC630.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047892709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787460	2543478	2542022	279898	278505	SPAC688.06c	SPAC23A1.03	slx4	apt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.411685859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787461	2543478	2541227	279898	277741	SPAC688.06c	SPBC947.05c	slx4	frp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.662647742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787462	2543478	2541428	279898	277933	SPAC688.06c	SPAC14C4.11	slx4	SPAC14C4.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453391363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787463	2543478	2543296	279898	279721	SPAC688.06c	SPAC9E9.03	slx4	leu2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.562931318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787464	2543478	3361316	279898	280392	SPAC688.06c	SPBC2D10.03c	slx4	SPBC2D10.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042126713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787465	2543478	2538969	279898	275543	SPAC688.06c	SPCC1840.12	slx4	opt3	-	SPCC1840.12|SPCC965.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.078679857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787466	2543478	2540714	279898	277237	SPAC688.06c	SPBC19C2.04c	slx4	ubp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.265261817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787467	2543478	2541663	279898	278159	SPAC688.06c	SPAC22G7.08	slx4	ppk8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.409205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787468	2543478	2542213	279898	278687	SPAC688.06c	SPAC3G6.13c	slx4	rpl4101	-	rpl41-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.50770542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787469	2543478	2542558	279898	279014	SPAC688.06c	SPAC1952.07	slx4	rad1	-	rad19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.261653316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787470	2543478	2541335	279898	277846	SPAC688.06c	SPBP4G3.03	slx4	SPBP4G3.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.073786547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787471	2543478	2539467	279898	276030	SPAC688.06c	SPCC417.07c	slx4	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.407947781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787472	2543478	2540797	279898	277316	SPAC688.06c	SPBC18H10.11c	slx4	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.501954341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787473	2543478	2541392	279898	277902	SPAC688.06c	SPBPB10D8.04c	slx4	SPBPB10D8.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.204647369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787474	2543478	2538751	279898	275334	SPAC688.06c	SPCC1442.07c	slx4	SPCC1442.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.26838864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787475	2543478	2541042	279898	277557	SPAC688.06c	SPBC359.03c	slx4	aat1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.027500282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787476	2543478	2543461	279898	279881	SPAC688.06c	SPAC521.03	slx4	SPAC521.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926839842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787477	2543478	2541264	279898	277778	SPAC688.06c	SPBC902.06	slx4	mto2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.266231807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787478	2543478	2540041	279898	276580	SPAC688.06c	SPBC1198.03c	slx4	SPBC1198.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.508101161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787479	2543478	2542507	279898	278965	SPAC688.06c	SPAC18G6.13	slx4	SPAC18G6.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099141494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787480	2543478	2540987	279898	277503	SPAC688.06c	SPBC36B7.05c	slx4	SPBC36B7.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.773083605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787481	2543478	2539754	279898	276306	SPAC688.06c	SPBC16C6.04	slx4	dbl6	-	SPBC16C6.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864825738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787482	2543478	2539733	279898	276285	SPAC688.06c	SPBC16E9.12c	slx4	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449739883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787483	2543478	2542971	279898	279410	SPAC688.06c	SPAC105.02c	slx4	SPAC105.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.151716059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787484	2543478	2539073	279898	275645	SPAC688.06c	SPCC1322.02	slx4	pxd1	-	SPCC1322.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92185851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787485	2543478	2542876	279898	279321	SPAC688.06c	SPAC9G1.04	slx4	oxa101	-	oxa1|oxa1-1|oxa1sp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851123012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787486	2543478	2542235	279898	278707	SPAC688.06c	SPAC18G6.05c	slx4	SPAC18G6.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639014207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787487	2543478	2539454	279898	276017	SPAC688.06c	SPCC622.15c	slx4	SPCC622.15c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874102632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787488	2543478	2541496	279898	277998	SPAC688.06c	SPAC23D3.09	slx4	arp42	-	arp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.073623625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787489	2543478	2539603	279898	276161	SPAC688.06c	SPBC1289.06c	slx4	ppr8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872813775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787490	2543478	2542860	279898	279306	SPAC688.06c	SPAC8C9.09c	slx4	mug129	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.137737609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787491	2543478	2538871	279898	275450	SPAC688.06c	SPCC1259.14c	slx4	meu27	-	B8647-6	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.40059085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787492	2543478	2539857	279898	276404	SPAC688.06c	SPBC1604.20c	slx4	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.275941882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787493	2543478	3361455	279898	280531	SPAC688.06c	SPAC1782.01	slx4	ecm29	-	SPAPYUG7.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926823887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787494	2543478	2541310	279898	277822	SPAC688.06c	SPBP18G5.03	slx4	toc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038028842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787495	2543478	2539586	279898	276145	SPAC688.06c	SPCC70.08c	slx4	SPCC70.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.230694211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787496	2543478	2539624	279898	276181	SPAC688.06c	SPBC1289.16c	slx4	cao2	-	SPBC8E4.06|spao2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.465150426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787497	2543478	2538808	279898	275389	SPAC688.06c	SPCPB16A4.05c	slx4	SPCPB16A4.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094907371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787498	2543478	2540176	279898	276709	SPAC688.06c	SPBC1709.01	slx4	chs2	-	SPBC1734.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808560423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787499	2543478	2538774	279898	275356	SPAC688.06c	SPCC162.06c	slx4	SPCC162.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.511869951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787500	2543478	2542976	279898	279414	SPAC688.06c	SPAC9E9.09c	slx4	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.125916959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787501	2543478	2541326	279898	277838	SPAC688.06c	SPBP35G2.03c	slx4	sgo1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.150636326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787502	2543478	2540961	279898	277477	SPAC688.06c	SPBC36B7.03	slx4	sec63	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.558282648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787503	2543478	2540943	279898	277459	SPAC688.06c	SPBC36B7.02	slx4	SPBC36B7.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097593026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787504	2543478	2540224	279898	276757	SPAC688.06c	SPBC32H8.06	slx4	mug93	-	pi018|SPACTOKYO_453.18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.82004705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787505	2543478	2539524	279898	276086	SPAC688.06c	SPCC70.02c	slx4	SPCC70.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152991708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787506	2543478	2540391	279898	276919	SPAC688.06c	SPBC31F10.05	slx4	mug37	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989931727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787507	2543478	2541366	279898	277877	SPAC688.06c	SPBP4H10.12	slx4	SPBP4H10.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927040983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787508	2543478	5802861	279898	857999	SPAC688.06c	SPAC1D4.01	slx4	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.33152482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787509	2543478	2541389	279898	277900	SPAC688.06c	SPBPB2B2.09c	slx4	SPBPB2B2.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.616654428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787510	2543478	2539368	279898	275934	SPAC688.06c	SPCC16A11.07	slx4	coq10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817555502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787511	2543478	2541112	279898	277627	SPAC688.06c	SPBC725.07	slx4	pex5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.341227231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787512	2543478	2543224	279898	279652	SPAC688.06c	SPAPB8E5.10	slx4	SPAPB8E5.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.514526554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787513	2543478	2541053	279898	277568	SPAC688.06c	SPBC56F2.10c	slx4	alg5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.672363438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787514	2543478	2540180	279898	276713	SPAC688.06c	SPBC16D10.11c	slx4	rps1801	-	rps18-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714379046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787515	2543478	2540967	279898	277483	SPAC688.06c	SPBC36B7.08c	slx4	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.545905374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787516	2543478	2539363	279898	275929	SPAC688.06c	SPCC613.02	slx4	SPCC613.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.968742011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787517	2543478	2542187	279898	278662	SPAC688.06c	SPAC57A7.09	slx4	SPAC57A7.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.823733299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787518	2543478	2539908	279898	276454	SPAC688.06c	SPBC13E7.06	slx4	msd1	-	mug172	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.641170021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787519	2543478	2540701	279898	277225	SPAC688.06c	SPBC19C7.08c	slx4	SPBC19C7.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.766843234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787520	2543478	2539499	279898	276062	SPAC688.06c	SPCC622.08c	slx4	hta1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818876965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787521	2543478	2538761	279898	275344	SPAC688.06c	SPCC622.02	slx4	SPCC622.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.977238105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787522	2543478	2541371	279898	277882	SPAC688.06c	SPBP4H10.17c	slx4	SPBP4H10.17c	-	mrps2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205336302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787523	2543478	2542401	279898	278865	SPAC688.06c	SPAC1142.02c	slx4	SPAC1142.02c	-	SPAC17G6.19c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097827897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787524	2543478	2540044	279898	276582	SPAC688.06c	SPBC1778.04	slx4	spo6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.335964236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787525	2543478	2541121	279898	277636	SPAC688.06c	SPBC609.03	slx4	iqw1	-	iqwd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.071617681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787526	2543478	2539030	279898	275603	SPAC688.06c	SPCP1E11.02	slx4	ppk38	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.284916366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787527	2543478	2540384	279898	276913	SPAC688.06c	SPBC29A10.11c	slx4	vps902	-	vps9b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787528	2543478	2539246	279898	275816	SPAC688.06c	SPCC18.13	slx4	SPCC18.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.959652007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787529	2543478	2543096	279898	279528	SPAC688.06c	SPAC977.05c	slx4	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320950078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787530	2543478	2538779	279898	275360	SPAC688.06c	SPCC569.07	slx4	SPCC569.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930275369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787531	2543478	2539471	279898	276034	SPAC688.06c	SPCC576.14	slx4	dph5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147658596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787532	2543478	2541114	279898	277629	SPAC688.06c	SPBC582.09	slx4	pex11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455259474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787533	2543478	2540891	279898	277407	SPAC688.06c	SPBC582.08	slx4	SPBC582.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.129605542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787534	2543478	2540277	279898	276808	SPAC688.06c	SPBC2D10.20	slx4	ubc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042298107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787535	2543478	2539635	279898	276191	SPAC688.06c	SPBC17D11.03c	slx4	SPBC17D11.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.508987724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787536	2543478	2542326	279898	278792	SPAC688.06c	SPAC16C9.07	slx4	pom2	-	SPAC2G11.01|mug189|ppk5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094849786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787537	2543478	3361329	279898	280405	SPAC688.06c	SPBC25H2.10c	slx4	SPBC25H2.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.340903327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787538	2543478	2543091	279898	279524	SPAC688.06c	SPAC12G12.15	slx4	sif3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.608724192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787539	2543478	2543228	279898	279656	SPAC688.06c	SPAC6B12.04c	slx4	SPAC6B12.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200386267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787540	2543478	2539188	279898	275759	SPAC688.06c	SPCC1827.04	slx4	vms1	-	SPCC1827.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.970331656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787541	2543478	2540182	279898	276715	SPAC688.06c	SPBC16G5.06	slx4	SPBC16G5.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462921429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787542	2543478	2540064	279898	276602	SPAC688.06c	SPBC1718.02	slx4	hop1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.226972191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787543	2543478	2540928	279898	277444	SPAC688.06c	SPBC3E7.10	slx4	fma1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.386542868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787544	2543478	2542305	279898	278772	SPAC688.06c	SPAC8C9.10c	slx4	rrp14	-	SPAC8C9.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509182554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787545	2543478	2542116	279898	278592	SPAC688.06c	SPAC1B3.15c	slx4	SPAC1B3.15c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.071132513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787546	2543478	2543525	279898	279943	SPAC688.06c	SPAC4A8.14	slx4	SPAC4A8.14	-	prs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382442532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787547	2543478	2541151	279898	277666	SPAC688.06c	SPBC713.03	slx4	SPBC713.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92910709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787548	2543478	2541238	279898	277752	SPAC688.06c	SPBC8E4.05c	slx4	SPBC8E4.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808552473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787549	2543478	2541709	279898	278204	SPAC688.06c	SPAC3C7.02c	slx4	pil2	-	SPAC3C7.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819244966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787550	2543478	2539743	279898	276295	SPAC688.06c	SPBC16A3.08c	slx4	oga1	-	SPBC16A3.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.508971225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787551	2543478	2540486	279898	277014	SPAC688.06c	SPBC21D10.07	slx4	cmc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983075915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787552	2543478	2540093	279898	276631	SPAC688.06c	SPBC115.02c	slx4	afg1	-	SPBC115.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.801970336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787553	2543478	2541808	279898	278299	SPAC688.06c	SPAC22A12.14c	slx4	SPAC22A12.14c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.920867129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787554	2543478	2541080	279898	277595	SPAC688.06c	SPBC557.04	slx4	ppk29	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19908175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787555	2543478	2540372	279898	276901	SPAC688.06c	SPBC31F10.03	slx4	SPBC31F10.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.269738087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787556	2543478	2540309	279898	276839	SPAC688.06c	SPBC21B10.13c	slx4	yox1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.758184277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787557	2543478	2543624	279898	280038	SPAC688.06c	SPAC4D7.06c	slx4	SPAC4D7.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197926549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787558	2543478	2538822	279898	275403	SPAC688.06c	SPCC1840.02c	slx4	bgs4	-	cwg1|orb11|pbr1|sph1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.609435498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787559	2543478	2542073	279898	278550	SPAC688.06c	SPAC26F1.01	slx4	sec74	-	SPAPJ691.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817597483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787560	2543478	2540310	279898	276840	SPAC688.06c	SPBC29B5.04c	slx4	SPBC29B5.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.270590444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787561	2543478	2541236	279898	277750	SPAC688.06c	SPBC887.11	slx4	pus2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.513800344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787562	2543165	2540467	279596	276995	SPAC343.07	SPBC2G2.07c	mug28	mug178	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.834850091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787563	2543165	2539244	279596	275814	SPAC343.07	SPCC1672.06c	mug28	asp1	-	vip1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877374327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787564	2543165	2541545	279596	278045	SPAC343.07	SPAC22F8.07c	mug28	rtf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81062277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787565	2543165	2540150	279596	276687	SPAC343.07	SPBC16E9.14c	mug28	zrg17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.911927004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787566	2543165	2542549	279596	279006	SPAC343.07	SPAC19A8.11c	mug28	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503490085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787567	2543165	2541478	279596	277980	SPAC343.07	SPAC2F7.17	mug28	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699062307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787568	2543165	2539220	279596	275790	SPAC343.07	SPCC297.05	mug28	SPCC297.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.315192848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787569	2543165	2541875	279596	278365	SPAC343.07	SPAC22F3.06c	mug28	lon1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.284316476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787570	2539892	2542710	276438	279163	SPBC1347.03	SPAC750.08c	meu14	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851782449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787571	2539892	2542519	276438	278977	SPBC1347.03	SPAC19G12.08	meu14	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.941895331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787572	2539892	2542673	276438	279126	SPBC1347.03	SPAC26A3.11	meu14	SPAC26A3.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51350048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787573	2540077	2542862	276615	279308	SPBC17D11.04c	SPAC140.03	nto1	arb1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035947548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787574	2540077	2541512	276615	278013	SPBC17D11.04c	SPAC11E3.08c	nto1	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32777636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787575	2540077	2543064	276615	279497	SPBC17D11.04c	SPAC3G6.01	nto1	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.614373935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787576	2540077	2540686	276615	277211	SPBC17D11.04c	SPBC21D10.10	nto1	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.518201145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787577	2540077	2539352	276615	275918	SPBC17D11.04c	SPCC188.07	nto1	ccq1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.209047225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787578	2540077	2540415	276615	276943	SPBC17D11.04c	SPBC30B4.06c	nto1	SPBC30B4.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778106797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787579	2540077	2540825	276615	277343	SPBC17D11.04c	SPBC428.08c	nto1	clr4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.174965895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787580	2540077	2539023	276615	275596	SPBC17D11.04c	SPCC594.05c	nto1	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.484286346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787581	2540077	2542513	276615	278971	SPBC17D11.04c	SPAC1952.05	nto1	gcn5	-	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.412326004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787582	2540077	2541776	276615	278270	SPBC17D11.04c	SPAC23H3.05c	nto1	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.41536434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787583	2540077	2540673	276615	277198	SPBC17D11.04c	SPBC1D7.03	nto1	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.540537712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787584	2540077	2541496	276615	277998	SPBC17D11.04c	SPAC23D3.09	nto1	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.521501254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787585	2540077	2542007	276615	278490	SPBC17D11.04c	SPAC20H4.07	nto1	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.128948605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787586	2540077	2539481	276615	276044	SPBC17D11.04c	SPCC622.16c	nto1	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.061382543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787587	2540077	2540967	276615	277483	SPBC17D11.04c	SPBC36B7.08c	nto1	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.355256261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787588	2540077	2540599	276615	277125	SPBC17D11.04c	SPBC29A3.10c	nto1	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.140365405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787589	2540077	2541746	276615	278240	SPBC17D11.04c	SPAC20G4.04c	nto1	hus1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.192197477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787590	2540077	2542806	276615	279254	SPBC17D11.04c	SPAC1610.01	nto1	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.514645006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787591	2540077	2538762	276615	275345	SPBC17D11.04c	SPCC306.04c	nto1	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.657926145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787592	2540077	2543567	276615	279983	SPBC17D11.04c	SPAC890.03	nto1	ppk16	-	mug92	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.359163308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787593	2540077	2539925	276615	276469	SPBC17D11.04c	SPBC16H5.13	nto1	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.542929816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787594	2540077	2541531	276615	278031	SPBC17D11.04c	SPAC25A8.01c	nto1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.909218414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787595	2540077	2542222	276615	278695	SPBC17D11.04c	SPAC31G5.18c	nto1	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.046495242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787596	2540077	2539668	276615	276223	SPBC17D11.04c	SPBC11B10.10c	nto1	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.487755536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787597	2540077	2542891	276615	279335	SPBC17D11.04c	SPAC6F12.12	nto1	par2	-	pbp2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090641821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787598	2540077	2543387	276615	279809	SPBC17D11.04c	SPAPB1E7.02c	nto1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.423654261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787599	2540077	2542440	276615	278902	SPBC17D11.04c	SPAC17A2.12	nto1	rrp1	-	SPAC17A2.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.029868652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787600	2540077	2540787	276615	277306	SPBC17D11.04c	SPBC1921.07c	nto1	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.736517721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787601	2541443	2538896	277948	275474	SPAC11E3.09	SPCC584.11c	pyp3	SPCC584.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040128698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787602	2541443	2539576	277948	276136	SPAC11E3.09	SPCC794.01c	pyp3	zwf2	-	SPCC794.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.723044997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787603	2541443	2539667	277948	276222	SPAC11E3.09	SPBC13G1.08c	pyp3	ash2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87120205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787604	2541443	2540519	277948	277047	SPAC11E3.09	SPBC21C3.14c	pyp3	SPBC21C3.14c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875446077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787605	2541443	2538792	277948	275373	SPAC11E3.09	SPCP1E11.10	pyp3	SPCP1E11.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.939238586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787606	2540832	2543317	277350	279741	SPBC18H10.05	SPAC823.14	SPBC18H10.05	ptf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.80901528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787607	2540832	2542598	277350	279052	SPBC18H10.05	SPAC6G10.08	SPBC18H10.05	idp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819763022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787608	2540832	2541438	277350	277943	SPBC18H10.05	SPAC23G3.10c	SPBC18H10.05	ssr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38845252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787609	2540832	2542273	277350	278742	SPBC18H10.05	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC18H10.05	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.933402242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787610	2540832	2541500	277350	278002	SPBC18H10.05	SPAC227.18	SPBC18H10.05	lys3	-	SPAC2F7.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.184465273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787611	2540832	2540692	277350	277217	SPBC18H10.05	SPBC800.07c	SPBC18H10.05	tsf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.968295248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787612	2540832	2539792	277350	276342	SPBC18H10.05	SPBC1271.14	SPBC18H10.05	SPBC1271.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.145373963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787613	2540832	2542791	277350	279240	SPBC18H10.05	SPAC167.04	SPBC18H10.05	pam17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.906990773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787614	2540832	2540964	277350	277480	SPBC18H10.05	SPBC365.16	SPBC18H10.05	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443775647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787615	2540832	2543593	277350	280008	SPBC18H10.05	SPAC4G9.10	SPBC18H10.05	arg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.366981613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787616	2540832	2543638	277350	280052	SPBC18H10.05	SPAC3H8.09c	SPBC18H10.05	nab3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149555522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787617	2540832	2542168	277350	278643	SPBC18H10.05	SPAC17A5.16	SPBC18H10.05	ftp105	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864597836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787618	2540832	2541183	277350	277697	SPBC18H10.05	SPBC725.14	SPBC18H10.05	arg6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.69243331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787619	2540832	2540538	277350	277065	SPBC18H10.05	SPBC26H8.03	SPBC18H10.05	cho2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638085894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787620	2540832	2539815	277350	276365	SPBC18H10.05	SPBC1105.02c	SPBC18H10.05	lys4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.113069544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787621	2540832	2542867	277350	279312	SPBC18H10.05	SPAC343.16	SPBC18H10.05	lys2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.972175817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787622	2540832	2542720	277350	279171	SPBC18H10.05	SPAC25G10.05c	SPBC18H10.05	his1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978211472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787623	2540832	2542597	277350	279051	SPBC18H10.05	SPAP8A3.07c	SPBC18H10.05	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.252051561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787624	2540832	2541186	277350	277700	SPBC18H10.05	SPBC725.01	SPBC18H10.05	SPBC725.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.691443816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787625	2540832	2538884	277350	275462	SPBC18H10.05	SPCC1393.08	SPBC18H10.05	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.14686343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787626	2540832	3361520	277350	280596	SPBC18H10.05	SPAC1610.02c	SPBC18H10.05	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.497420114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787627	2540832	2543391	277350	279813	SPBC18H10.05	SPAC4G9.09c	SPBC18H10.05	arg11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.461088269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787628	2540832	2542250	277350	278720	SPBC18H10.05	SPAC17D4.03c	SPBC18H10.05	cis4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820480551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787629	2540832	2541050	277350	277565	SPBC18H10.05	SPBC428.05c	SPBC18H10.05	arg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.801856149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787630	2540832	2542609	277350	279063	SPBC18H10.05	SPAC31G5.04	SPBC18H10.05	lys12	-	SPAC31G5.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.999637491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787631	2543201	2538906	279630	275483	SPAC3F10.15c	SPCC1259.03	spo12	rpa12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.250720026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787632	2543201	2542177	279630	278652	SPAC3F10.15c	SPAC17H9.08	spo12	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582678101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787633	2543201	2539898	279630	276444	SPAC3F10.15c	SPBC12D12.07c	spo12	trx2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640639732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787634	2543201	2542660	279630	279113	SPAC3F10.15c	SPAC328.03	spo12	tps1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.594549492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787635	2543201	2542861	279630	279307	SPAC3F10.15c	SPAC13G7.13c	spo12	msa1	-	SPAC6C3.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.628792655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787636	2543201	2539481	279630	276044	SPAC3F10.15c	SPCC622.16c	spo12	epe1	-	kdm2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808156774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787637	2543201	2543106	279630	279538	SPAC3F10.15c	SPAC3A11.13	spo12	SPAC3A11.13	-	SPAC3H5.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.859728247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787638	2543201	2542059	279630	278537	SPAC3F10.15c	SPAC328.06	spo12	ubp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.551394137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787639	2543201	2543372	279630	279794	SPAC3F10.15c	SPAPB1A10.09	spo12	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.562505845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787640	2541284	2542072	277797	278549	SPBC947.08c	SPAP32A8.03c	hip4	bop1	hpc2	SPAP32A8.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381644695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787641	2541284	2539050	277797	275623	SPBC947.08c	SPCC11E10.08	hip4	rik1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.764354443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787642	2541284	2542895	277797	279339	SPBC947.08c	SPAC13G6.10c	hip4	asl1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.275245337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787643	2541284	2541902	277797	278392	SPBC947.08c	SPAC27E2.07	hip4	pvg2	hpc2	mug53	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511568164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787644	2541284	2538721	277797	275305	SPBC947.08c	SPCC1494.10	hip4	adn3	hpc2	SPCC70.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318680423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787645	2541284	2538796	277797	275377	SPBC947.08c	SPCC63.06	hip4	SPCC63.06	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.404797278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787646	2541284	2541562	277797	278061	SPBC947.08c	SPAC24B11.05	hip4	SPAC24B11.05	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932269912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787647	2541284	2539584	277797	276143	SPBC947.08c	SPCC63.03	hip4	SPCC63.03	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199833064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787648	2541284	2542862	277797	279308	SPBC947.08c	SPAC140.03	hip4	arb1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.506779785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787649	2541284	2541257	277797	277771	SPBC947.08c	SPBP23A10.14c	hip4	ell1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.11571099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787650	2541284	2543317	277797	279741	SPBC947.08c	SPAC823.14	hip4	ptf1	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043455795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787651	2541284	2539151	277797	275723	SPBC947.08c	SPCC1235.12c	hip4	mug146	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.659940772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787652	2541284	2539549	277797	276110	SPBC947.08c	SPCC576.01c	hip4	xan1	hpc2	SPCC576.01c|SPCPB1C11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514579774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787653	2541284	2543617	277797	280031	SPBC947.08c	SPAC4A8.10	hip4	SPAC4A8.10	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709641186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787654	2541284	2542080	277797	278557	SPBC947.08c	SPAC27D7.03c	hip4	mei2	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.454792808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787655	2541284	2540833	277797	277351	SPBC947.08c	SPBC18H10.20c	hip4	any1	hpc2	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.61699826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787656	2541284	2542518	277797	278976	SPBC947.08c	SPAC1B3.16c	hip4	vht1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.221149242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787657	2541284	2541971	277797	278456	SPBC947.08c	SPAC27F1.05c	hip4	SPAC27F1.05c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329225594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787658	2541284	2541343	277797	277854	SPBC947.08c	SPBPB2B2.19c	hip4	SPBPB2B2.19c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.915123751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787659	2541284	2543635	277797	280049	SPBC947.08c	SPAC3H8.03	hip4	img2	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.404628129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787660	2541284	2543634	277797	280048	SPBC947.08c	SPAC3H8.04	hip4	SPAC3H8.04	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.184875125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787661	2541284	2541145	277797	277660	SPBC947.08c	SPBC651.12c	hip4	dbl7	hpc2	SPBC651.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870829069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787662	2541284	2540026	277797	276570	SPBC947.08c	SPBC16D10.08c	hip4	hsp104	hpc2	SPBC16D10.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.870431427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787663	2541284	2542812	277797	279259	SPBC947.08c	SPAC6F6.01	hip4	cch1	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.953850548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787664	2541284	2539684	277797	276239	SPBC947.08c	SPBC16A3.16	hip4	SPBC16A3.16	hpc2	cwc27	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809654666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787665	2541284	2541818	277797	278309	SPBC947.08c	SPAC11G7.02	hip4	pub1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.973408113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787666	2541284	2543064	277797	279497	SPBC947.08c	SPAC3G6.01	hip4	hrp3	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.316079409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787667	2541284	2542671	277797	279124	SPBC947.08c	SPAC824.09c	hip4	SPAC824.09c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.846813548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787668	2541284	2542643	277797	279097	SPBC947.08c	SPAC2C4.07c	hip4	dis32	hpc2	SPAC2C4.07c|dis3L2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.226801713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787669	2541284	2539855	277797	276403	SPBC947.08c	SPBC14F5.07	hip4	doa10	hpc2	ssm4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.025418787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787670	2541284	2539156	277797	275728	SPBC947.08c	SPCC1450.08c	hip4	wtf16	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.253621466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787671	2541284	2540524	277797	277052	SPBC947.08c	SPBC21B10.08c	hip4	SPBC21B10.08c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.567826522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787672	2541284	2542378	277797	278842	SPBC947.08c	SPAC1805.04	hip4	nup132	hpc2	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.012907548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787673	2541284	2540528	277797	277056	SPBC947.08c	SPBC18H10.04c	hip4	sce3	hpc2	tif48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852954404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787674	2541284	2542237	277797	278709	SPBC947.08c	SPAC19E9.02	hip4	fin1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.815543109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787675	2541284	3361561	277797	280637	SPBC947.08c	SPAC11E3.01c	hip4	swr1	hpc2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.488388659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787676	2541284	2542650	277797	279104	SPBC947.08c	SPAC2C4.10c	hip4	csc4	hpc2	SPAC2C4.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.567743363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787677	2541284	2541853	277797	278344	SPBC947.08c	SPAC2F3.11	hip4	SPAC2F3.11	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318189363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787678	2541284	2539097	277797	275669	SPBC947.08c	SPCC757.04	hip4	SPCC757.04	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865533369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787679	2541284	2540410	277797	276938	SPBC947.08c	SPBC2D10.04	hip4	SPBC2D10.04	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.458439792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787680	2541284	2538732	277797	275316	SPBC947.08c	SPCC548.07c	hip4	ght1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.710702768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787681	2541284	2541856	277797	278347	SPBC947.08c	SPAC23H3.08c	hip4	bub3	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.961046296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787682	2541284	2542502	277797	278960	SPBC947.08c	SPAC139.06	hip4	hat1	hpc2	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.652888538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787683	2541284	2543376	277797	279798	SPBC947.08c	SPAC3H1.06c	hip4	SPAC3H1.06c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.568185742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787684	2541284	2541633	277797	278129	SPBC947.08c	SPAC664.01c	hip4	swi6	hpc2	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.570982479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787685	2541284	2540474	277797	277002	SPBC947.08c	SPBC26H8.09c	hip4	snf59	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.434978226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787686	2541284	2543572	277797	279987	SPBC947.08c	SPAC4G8.04	hip4	SPAC4G8.04	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.133795361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787687	2541284	2540347	277797	276876	SPBC947.08c	SPBC30B4.08	hip4	eri1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.751651108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787688	2541284	2540686	277797	277211	SPBC947.08c	SPBC21D10.10	hip4	bdc1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446270763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787689	2541284	2538922	277797	275499	SPBC947.08c	SPCC16C4.10	hip4	SPCC16C4.10	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328870139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787690	2541284	2541584	277797	278081	SPBC947.08c	SPAP32A8.02	hip4	SPAP32A8.02	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.716266007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787691	2541284	2542103	277797	278579	SPBC947.08c	SPAC31G5.11	hip4	pac2	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.139497965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787692	2541284	2540579	277797	277105	SPBC947.08c	SPBC28E12.02	hip4	SPBC28E12.02	hpc2	SPBC9B6.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.270284326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787693	2541284	2540491	277797	277019	SPBC947.08c	SPBC28E12.04	hip4	SPBC28E12.04	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.272551005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787694	2541284	2542040	277797	278521	SPBC947.08c	SPAC212.01c	hip4	SPAC212.01c	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.400482162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787695	2541284	2540455	277797	276983	SPBC947.08c	SPBC215.05	hip4	gpd1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.437516715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787696	2541284	2540535	277797	277062	SPBC947.08c	SPBC215.01	hip4	SPBC215.01	hpc2	SPBC3B9.20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.478633863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787697	2541284	3361436	277797	280512	SPBC947.08c	SPAC1296.01c	hip4	SPAC1296.01c	hpc2	SPAC22F3.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.618242017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787698	2541284	2543320	277797	279744	SPBC947.08c	SPAPJ695.01c	hip4	SPAPJ695.01c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.810338825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787699	2541284	2541286	277797	277799	SPBC947.08c	SPBC9B6.11c	hip4	SPBC9B6.11c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.33105754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787700	2541284	2540999	277797	277515	SPBC947.08c	SPBC4B4.04	hip4	SPBC4B4.04	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.007935123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787701	2541284	2541086	277797	277601	SPBC947.08c	SPBC685.04c	hip4	aps2	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81194336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787702	2541284	2539420	277797	275985	SPBC947.08c	SPCC970.07c	hip4	raf2	hpc2	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.049318724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787703	2541284	2541200	277797	277714	SPBC947.08c	SPBC8D2.03c	hip4	hhf2	hpc2	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.844140289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787704	2541284	2542468	277797	278929	SPBC947.08c	SPAC1D4.09c	hip4	rtf2	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.946089215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787705	2541284	2541208	277797	277722	SPBC947.08c	SPBC887.04c	hip4	lub1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.604552864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787706	2541284	2538847	277797	275428	SPBC947.08c	SPCC594.06c	hip4	SPCC594.06c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.148877442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787707	2541284	2541471	277797	277973	SPBC947.08c	SPAC1F5.03c	hip4	SPAC1F5.03c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448310669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787708	2541284	2542816	277797	279263	SPBC947.08c	SPAC4G8.11c	hip4	atp10	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.617744634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787709	2541284	2541058	277797	277573	SPBC947.08c	SPBC3H7.09	hip4	erf2	hpc2	mug142	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851886614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787710	2541284	2541994	277797	278478	SPBC947.08c	SPAC26A3.14c	hip4	SPAC26A3.14c	hpc2	SPAC23A6.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.919476896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787711	2541284	2539913	277797	276457	SPBC947.08c	SPBC11G11.03	hip4	mrt4	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578545066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787712	2541284	2543518	277797	279936	SPBC947.08c	SPAC4F8.11	hip4	SPAC4F8.11	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986335863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787713	2541284	2543288	277797	279713	SPBC947.08c	SPAC6C3.03c	hip4	SPAC6C3.03c	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042335216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787714	2541284	2543260	277797	279688	SPBC947.08c	SPAC1002.17c	hip4	urg2	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866144968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787715	2541284	2543043	277797	279478	SPBC947.08c	SPAC3F10.13	hip4	ucp6	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931173072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787716	2541284	2542696	277797	279149	SPBC947.08c	SPAC29B12.03	hip4	spd1	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.695131089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787717	2541284	2542299	277797	278766	SPBC947.08c	SPAC18B11.10	hip4	tup11	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769883788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787718	2541284	2538801	277797	275382	SPBC947.08c	SPCC285.13c	hip4	nup60	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.047972247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787719	2541284	2542689	277797	279142	SPBC947.08c	SPAC29B12.04	hip4	snz1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.11798682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787720	2541284	2542724	277797	279175	SPBC947.08c	SPAC767.01c	hip4	vps1	hpc2	SPAC9G1.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.402024663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787721	2541284	2540919	277797	277435	SPBC947.08c	SPBC543.07	hip4	pek1	hpc2	mkk1|skh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.628195121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787722	2541284	2540306	277797	276836	SPBC947.08c	SPBC2G5.02c	hip4	ckb2	hpc2	SPBC2G5.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.771537132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787723	2541284	2542848	277797	279294	SPBC947.08c	SPAC9G1.03c	hip4	rpl3001	hpc2	rpl30|rpl30-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.144088542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787724	2541284	2539434	277797	275997	SPBC947.08c	SPCC757.09c	hip4	rnc1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.382566942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787725	2541284	2543453	277797	279873	SPBC947.08c	SPAC3G9.03	hip4	rpl2301	hpc2	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.670187742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787726	2541284	2541781	277797	278274	SPBC947.08c	SPAC23G3.07c	hip4	snf30	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041965075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787727	2541284	2539575	277797	276135	SPBC947.08c	SPCP20C8.02c	hip4	SPCP20C8.02c	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818332413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787728	2541284	2543030	277797	279466	SPBC947.08c	SPAC12B10.10	hip4	nod1	hpc2	SPAC12B10.10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.782873403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787729	2541284	2541811	277797	278302	SPBC947.08c	SPAC22A12.16	hip4	SPAC22A12.16	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386975675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787730	2541284	2539937	277797	276481	SPBC947.08c	SPBC1539.08	hip4	arf6	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.343279779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787731	2541284	2539314	277797	275880	SPBC947.08c	SPCC548.05c	hip4	dbl5	hpc2	SPCC548.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86983008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787732	2541284	2542182	277797	278657	SPBC947.08c	SPAC19B12.08	hip4	atg4	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.508933245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787733	2541284	2540463	277797	276991	SPBC947.08c	SPBC2F12.15c	hip4	pfa3	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.998670003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787734	2541284	2541530	277797	278030	SPBC947.08c	SPAC57A10.10c	hip4	sla1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.813417873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787735	2541284	2539302	277797	275870	SPBC947.08c	SPCC126.09	hip4	zip2	hpc2	SPCC126.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867100763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787736	2541284	2541998	277797	278482	SPBC947.08c	SPAC23A1.09	hip4	SPAC23A1.09	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.921292679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787737	2541284	2540727	277797	277250	SPBC947.08c	SPBC1921.03c	hip4	mex67	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.999828313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787738	2541284	2542022	277797	278505	SPBC947.08c	SPAC23A1.03	hip4	apt1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574798481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787739	2541284	2540425	277797	276953	SPBC947.08c	SPBC27.06c	hip4	mgr2	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.07136909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787740	2541284	2538716	277797	275300	SPBC947.08c	SPCC13B11.02c	hip4	SPCC13B11.02c	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.411520855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787741	2541284	2542318	277797	278784	SPBC947.08c	SPAC16C9.05	hip4	cph1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.093486832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787742	2541284	2539365	277797	275931	SPBC947.08c	SPCC24B10.16c	hip4	SPCC24B10.16c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.0578138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787743	2541284	2541527	277797	278027	SPBC947.08c	SPAC31A2.09c	hip4	apm4	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.205744952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787744	2541284	2542277	277797	278746	SPBC947.08c	SPAC17A5.02c	hip4	dbr1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.478254387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787745	2541284	2539441	277797	276004	SPBC947.08c	SPCPJ732.02c	hip4	xks1	hpc2	SPCPJ732.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.340128838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787746	2541284	2543308	277797	279732	SPBC947.08c	SPAC694.04c	hip4	SPAC694.04c	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.929392518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787747	2541284	2541960	277797	278447	SPBC947.08c	SPAC6G9.15c	hip4	SPAC6G9.15c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.060889319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787748	2541284	2539175	277797	275746	SPBC947.08c	SPCC16C4.01	hip4	sif2	hpc2	SPCC5E4.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.411886744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787749	2541284	2539822	277797	276372	SPBC947.08c	SPBC16G5.02c	hip4	SPBC16G5.02c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.211842832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787750	2541284	2543296	277797	279721	SPBC947.08c	SPAC9E9.03	hip4	leu2	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.853076187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787751	2541284	2539129	277797	275701	SPBC947.08c	SPCC338.14	hip4	ado1	hpc2	SPCC338.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.756270624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787752	2541284	2541311	277797	277823	SPBC947.08c	SPBP8B7.09c	hip4	los1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.005828768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787753	2541284	2543108	277797	279540	SPBC947.08c	SPAC3A12.13c	hip4	SPAC3A12.13c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.162344144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787754	2541284	2539244	277797	275814	SPBC947.08c	SPCC1672.06c	hip4	asp1	hpc2	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.059309576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787755	2541284	2540714	277797	277237	SPBC947.08c	SPBC19C2.04c	hip4	ubp11	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38111013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787756	2541284	2543584	277797	279999	SPBC947.08c	SPAPB1E7.11c	hip4	SPAPB1E7.11c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.319630133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787757	2541284	2539100	277797	275672	SPBC947.08c	SPCC330.12c	hip4	sdh3	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.173982486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787758	2541284	2542530	277797	278988	SPBC947.08c	SPAC1399.02	hip4	SPAC1399.02	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.266928961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787759	2541284	2543078	277797	279511	SPBC947.08c	SPAC31A2.15c	hip4	dcc1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388204082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787760	2541284	2540415	277797	276943	SPBC947.08c	SPBC30B4.06c	hip4	SPBC30B4.06c	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.236940749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787761	2541284	2541663	277797	278159	SPBC947.08c	SPAC22G7.08	hip4	ppk8	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517959608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787762	2541284	2538972	277797	275546	SPBC947.08c	SPCC1739.15	hip4	wtf21	hpc2	wtf3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.252553698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787763	2541284	2542253	277797	278723	SPBC947.08c	SPAC17H9.04c	hip4	SPAC17H9.04c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.809914135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787764	2541284	2542034	277797	278516	SPBC947.08c	SPAC27E2.04c	hip4	mug155	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.712275191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787765	2541284	2542791	277797	279240	SPBC947.08c	SPAC167.04	hip4	pam17	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.809793344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787766	2541284	3361543	277797	280619	SPBC947.08c	SPAC9.13c	hip4	cwf16	hpc2	SPAPJ735.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19245497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787767	2541284	2543651	277797	280065	SPBC947.08c	SPAC644.11c	hip4	pkp1	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.410924674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787768	2541284	2542239	277797	278711	SPBC947.08c	SPAC18G6.02c	hip4	chp1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.415835805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787769	2541284	2539960	277797	276504	SPBC947.08c	SPBC15D4.15	hip4	pho2	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.00933167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787770	2541284	2539467	277797	276030	SPBC947.08c	SPCC417.07c	hip4	mto1	hpc2	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.19069876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787771	2541284	2539388	277797	275953	SPBC947.08c	SPCC24B10.12	hip4	cgi121	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.114934193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787772	2541284	2542311	277797	278777	SPBC947.08c	SPAC16A10.05c	hip4	dad1	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.186175931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787773	2541284	2543514	277797	279932	SPBC947.08c	SPAC4D7.03	hip4	pop2	hpc2	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.854658423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787774	2541284	2542950	277797	279390	SPBC947.08c	SPAC12B10.03	hip4	bun62	hpc2	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.505007912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787775	2541284	2541664	277797	278160	SPBC947.08c	SPAC2H10.01	hip4	SPAC2H10.01	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049798964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787776	2541284	2539804	277797	276354	SPBC947.08c	SPBC1105.11c	hip4	hht3	hpc2	h3.3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.142567318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787777	2541284	2541741	277797	278235	SPBC947.08c	SPAC20G4.02c	hip4	fus1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.059313001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787778	2541284	2543020	277797	279456	SPBC947.08c	SPAC10F6.13c	hip4	SPAC10F6.13c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.344442877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787779	2541284	2538821	277797	275402	SPBC947.08c	SPCC584.01c	hip4	SPCC584.01c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.630699674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787780	2541284	2540931	277797	277447	SPBC947.08c	SPBC365.07c	hip4	SPBC365.07c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.122770064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787781	2541284	2541042	277797	277557	SPBC947.08c	SPBC359.03c	hip4	aat1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.919920145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787782	2541284	2541801	277797	278292	SPBC947.08c	SPAC2F7.08c	hip4	snf5	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.082004081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787783	2541284	2538715	277797	275299	SPBC947.08c	SPCC1223.05c	hip4	rpl3702	hpc2	rpl37|rpl37-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.343449679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787784	2541284	2543144	277797	279576	SPBC947.08c	SPAC3F10.05c	hip4	mug113	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.182900018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787785	2541284	2543385	277797	279807	SPBC947.08c	SPAC4G9.12	hip4	SPAC4G9.12	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039907105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787786	2541284	2541982	277797	278467	SPBC947.08c	SPAC23A1.06c	hip4	cmk2	hpc2	mkp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572562926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787787	2541284	2543445	277797	279865	SPBC947.08c	SPAC4F10.13c	hip4	mpd2	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.198690397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787788	2541284	2542249	277797	278719	SPBC947.08c	SPAC30D11.14c	hip4	SPAC30D11.14c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.408421608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787789	2541284	2538770	277797	275353	SPBC947.08c	SPCC1753.02c	hip4	git3	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.809562304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787790	2541284	2542652	277797	279106	SPBC947.08c	SPAC1687.15	hip4	gsk3	hpc2	skp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.843395155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787791	2541284	2542463	277797	278924	SPBC947.08c	SPAC1834.03c	hip4	hhf1	hpc2	h4.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.70294116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787792	2541284	2540429	277797	276957	SPBC947.08c	SPBC29A10.07	hip4	pom152	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647073192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787793	2541284	2542776	277797	279225	SPBC947.08c	SPAC167.01	hip4	ire1	hpc2	ppk4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.924454465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787794	2541284	2540637	277797	277163	SPBC947.08c	SPBC29A10.02	hip4	spo5	hpc2	SPBC365.18|mrb1|mug12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.850543082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787795	2541284	2538811	277797	275392	SPBC947.08c	SPCC330.03c	hip4	SPCC330.03c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709929207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787796	2541284	3361491	277797	280567	SPBC947.08c	SPAC1805.08	hip4	dlc1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.004115875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787797	2541284	2540338	277797	276867	SPBC947.08c	SPBC2G2.13c	hip4	dcd1	hpc2	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.688818263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787798	2541284	2542123	277797	278599	SPBC947.08c	SPAC18G6.15	hip4	mal3	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.884306127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787799	2541284	2538706	277797	275290	SPBC947.08c	SPCC338.08	hip4	ctp1	hpc2	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.919727612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787800	2541284	2540352	277797	276881	SPBC947.08c	SPBC215.03c	hip4	csn1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.089109794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787801	2541284	2539754	277797	276306	SPBC947.08c	SPBC16C6.04	hip4	dbl6	hpc2	SPBC16C6.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.029603362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787802	2541284	2542866	277797	279311	SPBC947.08c	SPAC9E9.17c	hip4	SPAC9E9.17c	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.636695579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787803	2541284	2540673	277797	277198	SPBC947.08c	SPBC1D7.03	hip4	mug80	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.041566817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787804	2541284	2542971	277797	279410	SPBC947.08c	SPAC105.02c	hip4	SPAC105.02c	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.717318575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787805	2541284	2541735	277797	278229	SPBC947.08c	SPAC7D4.04	hip4	atg11	hpc2	taf1|cvt9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.12686979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787806	2541284	2538800	277797	275381	SPBC947.08c	SPCC1322.06	hip4	kap113	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442508994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787807	2541284	2540363	277797	276892	SPBC947.08c	SPBC2F12.09c	hip4	atf21	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.028154539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787808	2541284	2539073	277797	275645	SPBC947.08c	SPCC1322.02	hip4	pxd1	hpc2	SPCC1322.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.666381583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787809	2541284	2540886	277797	277403	SPBC947.08c	SPBC4F6.10	hip4	vps901	hpc2	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388477225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787810	2541284	2540543	277797	277070	SPBC947.08c	SPBC29A10.06c	hip4	ely5	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923955018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787811	2541284	2542168	277797	278643	SPBC947.08c	SPAC17A5.16	hip4	ftp105	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575650085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787812	2541284	2539371	277797	275937	SPBC947.08c	SPCC18B5.06	hip4	dom34	hpc2	SPCC18B5.06|erf1|sup45	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990177859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787813	2541284	2542873	277797	279318	SPBC947.08c	SPAC9G1.02	hip4	wis4	hpc2	wak1|wik1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388314418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787814	2541284	2542921	277797	279362	SPBC947.08c	SPAC1093.01	hip4	ppr5	hpc2	SPAC12B10.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.985770426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787815	2541284	2543117	277797	279549	SPBC947.08c	SPAC806.08c	hip4	mod21	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930053789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787816	2541284	2539689	277797	276244	SPBC947.08c	SPBC1861.03	hip4	mak10	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.120163811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787817	2541284	2543245	277797	279673	SPBC947.08c	SPAC56F8.06c	hip4	alg10	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451372567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787818	2541284	2539168	277797	275739	SPBC947.08c	SPCC1620.08	hip4	SPCC1620.08	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771959554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787819	2541284	2539857	277797	276404	SPBC947.08c	SPBC1604.20c	hip4	tea2	hpc2	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.215573468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787820	2541284	2538994	277797	275568	SPBC947.08c	SPCC553.01c	hip4	dbl2	hpc2	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935303608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787821	2541284	2542357	277797	278822	SPBC947.08c	SPAC1782.07	hip4	qcr8	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.666322993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787822	2541284	2543643	277797	280057	SPBC947.08c	SPAC3G9.07c	hip4	hos2	hpc2	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.846592885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787823	2541284	2541899	277797	278389	SPBC947.08c	SPAC22E12.11c	hip4	set3	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.016710153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787824	2541284	2540086	277797	276624	SPBC947.08c	SPBC16H5.12c	hip4	SPBC16H5.12c	hpc2	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.487292087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787825	2541284	2541739	277797	278233	SPBC947.08c	SPAC2G11.10c	hip4	SPAC2G11.10c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387028314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787826	2541284	2540231	277797	276763	SPBC947.08c	SPBC336.14c	hip4	ppk26	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.620427608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787827	2541284	2543250	277797	279678	SPBC947.08c	SPAC3G9.15c	hip4	fcf2	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.063788436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787828	2541284	2541710	277797	278205	SPBC947.08c	SPAC343.11c	hip4	msc1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.135303361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787829	2541284	2543396	277797	279818	SPBC947.08c	SPAC4D7.11	hip4	dsc4	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.331903657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787830	2541284	2540538	277797	277065	SPBC947.08c	SPBC26H8.03	hip4	cho2	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.155453828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787831	2541284	2543406	277797	279828	SPBC947.08c	SPAC9.12c	hip4	atp12	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.711865574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787832	2541284	2540350	277797	276879	SPBC947.08c	SPBC317.01	hip4	mbx2	hpc2	pvg4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389390956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787833	2541284	2539284	277797	275852	SPBC947.08c	SPCC584.15c	hip4	SPCC584.15c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.701554638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787834	2541284	2540326	277797	276856	SPBC947.08c	SPBC2G5.06c	hip4	hmt2	hpc2	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.275668617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787835	2541284	2542526	277797	278984	SPBC947.08c	SPAC57A7.13	hip4	SPAC57A7.13	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189283106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787836	2541284	2538769	277797	275352	SPBC947.08c	SPCC126.04c	hip4	sgf73	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.877836926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787837	2541284	2539667	277797	276222	SPBC947.08c	SPBC13G1.08c	hip4	ash2	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.482895938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787838	2541284	2542861	277797	279307	SPBC947.08c	SPAC13G7.13c	hip4	msa1	hpc2	SPAC6C3.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.803680638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787839	2541284	2542782	277797	279231	SPBC947.08c	SPAC1687.06c	hip4	rpl44	hpc2	rpl28	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925290052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787840	2541284	2542126	277797	278602	SPBC947.08c	SPAC1B3.05	hip4	not3	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.564178159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787841	2541284	2539000	277797	275574	SPBC947.08c	SPCC1450.06c	hip4	grx3	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.686300579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787842	2541284	2540665	277797	277190	SPBC947.08c	SPBC83.02c	hip4	rpl4302	hpc2	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.298035507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787843	2541284	2540261	277797	276792	SPBC947.08c	SPBC543.05c	hip4	SPBC543.05c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707909909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787844	2541284	2542007	277797	278490	SPBC947.08c	SPAC20H4.07	hip4	rad57	hpc2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.298534662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787845	2541284	2540997	277797	277513	SPBC947.08c	SPBC3H7.06c	hip4	pof9	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.388466851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787846	2541284	2538873	277797	275452	SPBC947.08c	SPCC306.11	hip4	SPCC306.11	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.203144055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787847	2541284	2540290	277797	276821	SPBC947.08c	SPBC29A3.02c	hip4	his7	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.341603679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787848	2541284	2542976	277797	279414	SPBC947.08c	SPAC9E9.09c	hip4	atd1	hpc2	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.626759042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787849	2541284	2542740	277797	279190	SPBC947.08c	SPAC9G1.06c	hip4	cyk3	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.878008602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787850	2541284	2539974	277797	276518	SPBC947.08c	SPBC32H8.07	hip4	git5	hpc2	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.913244392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787851	2541284	2539224	277797	275794	SPBC947.08c	SPCC16A11.01	hip4	SPCC16A11.01	hpc2	SPCC63.15	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.820563261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787852	2541284	2540394	277797	276922	SPBC947.08c	SPBC2D10.09	hip4	snr1	hpc2	SPBC2D10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.083148646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787853	2541284	2538841	277797	275422	SPBC947.08c	SPCC550.03c	hip4	SPCC550.03c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.779290678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787854	2541284	2539232	277797	275802	SPBC947.08c	SPCC1223.04c	hip4	set11	hpc2	mug76	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979972427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787855	2541284	2542254	277797	278724	SPBC947.08c	SPAC30D11.04c	hip4	nup124	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.659986513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787856	2541284	2541900	277797	278390	SPBC947.08c	SPAC23H4.17c	hip4	srb10	hpc2	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.563714229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787857	2541284	2542214	277797	278688	SPBC947.08c	SPACUNK4.11c	hip4	mpp6	hpc2	SPACUNK4.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.686112578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787858	2541284	2543301	277797	279726	SPBC947.08c	SPAC977.17	hip4	SPAC977.17	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.408493165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787859	2541284	2543311	277797	279735	SPBC947.08c	SPAC977.15	hip4	SPAC977.15	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.75522354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787860	2541284	2539408	277797	275973	SPBC947.08c	SPCC576.12c	hip4	mhf2	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787861	2541284	5802861	277797	857999	SPBC947.08c	SPAC1D4.01	hip4	tls1	hpc2	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.196828405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787862	2541284	2542919	277797	279360	SPBC947.08c	SPAC6C3.08	hip4	nas6	hpc2	SPAC6C3.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.050416505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787863	2541284	2543683	277797	280097	SPBC947.08c	SPAPB1E7.04c	hip4	SPAPB1E7.04c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514843908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787864	2541284	2542437	277797	278899	SPBC947.08c	SPAC17A5.01	hip4	pex6	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.571074208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787865	2541284	2542439	277797	278901	SPBC947.08c	SPAC17A5.08	hip4	erp2	hpc2	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.881950928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787866	2541284	2538949	277797	275523	SPBC947.08c	SPCC320.03	hip4	SPCC320.03	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.380307737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787867	2541284	2540990	277797	277506	SPBC947.08c	SPBC36B7.06c	hip4	mug20	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389601721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787868	2541284	2543443	277797	279863	SPBC947.08c	SPAC3H1.12c	hip4	snt2	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147910073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787869	2541284	2539317	277797	275883	SPBC947.08c	SPCC16A11.08	hip4	atg20	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.458118573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787870	2541284	2543550	277797	279967	SPBC947.08c	SPAC922.06	hip4	SPAC922.06	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.405311925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787871	2541284	2541112	277797	277627	SPBC947.08c	SPBC725.07	hip4	pex5	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.767401435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787872	2541284	2541708	277797	278203	SPBC947.08c	SPAC31A2.02	hip4	trm112	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.468336042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787873	2541284	2541464	277797	277966	SPBC947.08c	SPAC222.08c	hip4	SPAC222.08c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.091411048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787874	2541284	2540342	277797	276871	SPBC947.08c	SPBC2G2.01c	hip4	liz1	hpc2	SPBC4B4.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048085743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787875	2541284	2542960	277797	279400	SPBC947.08c	SPAC1039.04	hip4	SPAC1039.04	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.921819693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787876	2541284	2540967	277797	277483	SPBC947.08c	SPBC36B7.08c	hip4	SPBC36B7.08c	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.517464288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787877	2541284	2540599	277797	277125	SPBC947.08c	SPBC29A3.10c	hip4	atp14	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.765442209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787878	2541284	2542773	277797	279222	SPBC947.08c	SPAC16.01	hip4	rho2	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.888497203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787879	2541284	2541283	277797	277796	SPBC947.08c	SPBP8B7.02	hip4	rng9	hpc2	SPBP8B7.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.040436016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787880	2541284	2541296	277797	277808	SPBC947.08c	SPBP8B7.06	hip4	rpp201	hpc2	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.435499431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787881	2541284	2540533	277797	277061	SPBC947.08c	SPBC29A10.16c	hip4	SPBC29A10.16c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.569993037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787882	2541284	2538690	277797	275275	SPBC947.08c	SPCC1393.05	hip4	ers1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.228055743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787883	2541284	2540229	277797	276761	SPBC947.08c	SPBC31F10.15c	hip4	atp15	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.794706637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787884	2541284	2541927	277797	278415	SPBC947.08c	SPAC222.12c	hip4	atp2	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.904496339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787885	2541284	2542255	277797	278725	SPBC947.08c	SPAC57A7.08	hip4	pzh1	hpc2	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.559629415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787886	2541284	2542829	277797	279276	SPBC947.08c	SPAC13D6.02c	hip4	byr3	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4396949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787887	2541284	2539113	277797	275685	SPBC947.08c	SPCC1919.11	hip4	mug137	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.074631292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787888	2541284	2539812	277797	276362	SPBC947.08c	SPBC1347.02	hip4	fkbp39	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.089335079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787889	2541284	2540193	277797	276726	SPBC947.08c	SPBC1289.10c	hip4	adn2	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.626120494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787890	2541284	2539605	277797	276163	SPBC947.08c	SPBC1105.13c	hip4	SPBC1105.13c	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.022885018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787891	2541284	2542781	277797	279230	SPBC947.08c	SPAC57A10.12c	hip4	ura3	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.048494419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787892	2541284	2539527	277797	276089	SPBC947.08c	SPCC338.16	hip4	pof3	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.267118468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787893	2541284	2541963	277797	278449	SPBC947.08c	SPAC21E11.04	hip4	aca1	hpc2	ppr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92262334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787894	2541284	2538848	277797	275429	SPBC947.08c	SPCC613.12c	hip4	raf1	hpc2	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.079018668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787895	2541284	3361520	277797	280596	SPBC947.08c	SPAC1610.02c	hip4	SPAC1610.02c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.880838348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787896	2541284	2542869	277797	279314	SPBC947.08c	SPAC140.02	hip4	gar2	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443137622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787897	2541284	2541628	277797	278124	SPBC947.08c	SPAC110.02	hip4	pds5	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.772789818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787898	2541284	2541762	277797	278256	SPBC947.08c	SPAC139.01c	hip4	SPAC139.01c	hpc2	SPAC955.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.273856641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787899	2541284	2539595	277797	276153	SPBC947.08c	SPCC965.14c	hip4	SPCC965.14c	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81726508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787900	2541284	2542875	277797	279320	SPBC947.08c	SPAC13G7.02c	hip4	ssa1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325040155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787901	2541284	2539245	277797	275815	SPBC947.08c	SPCC1322.07c	hip4	mug150	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039036364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787902	2541284	2542725	277797	279176	SPBC947.08c	SPAC3A12.10	hip4	rpl2001	hpc2	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632688075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787903	2541284	2539538	277797	276100	SPBC947.08c	SPCC364.06	hip4	nap1	hpc2	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.549482236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787904	2541284	2539763	277797	276314	SPBC947.08c	SPBC1861.05	hip4	SPBC1861.05	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.899203222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787905	2541284	2539906	277797	276452	SPBC947.08c	SPBC16G5.17	hip4	SPBC16G5.17	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.875007955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787906	2541284	2542806	277797	279254	SPBC947.08c	SPAC1610.01	hip4	saf5	hpc2	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.259692507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787907	2541284	2543113	277797	279545	SPBC947.08c	SPAC3F10.07c	hip4	erf4	hpc2	mug91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.324969226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787908	2541284	2542198	277797	278673	SPBC947.08c	SPAC6F12.09	hip4	rdp1	hpc2	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.368826604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787909	2541284	2539476	277797	276039	SPBC947.08c	SPCC364.04c	hip4	coy1	hpc2	SPCC364.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.867100333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787910	2541284	2539160	277797	275732	SPBC947.08c	SPCC18.17c	hip4	SPCC18.17c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.672336128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787911	2541284	2543332	277797	279755	SPBC947.08c	SPAPB8E5.04c	hip4	SPAPB8E5.04c	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.228217489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787912	2541284	2540442	277797	276970	SPBC947.08c	SPBC25B2.04c	hip4	mtg1	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.639480156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787913	2541284	2539499	277797	276062	SPBC947.08c	SPCC622.08c	hip4	hta1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.764991106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787914	2541284	2538762	277797	275345	SPBC947.08c	SPCC306.04c	hip4	set1	hpc2	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.02253084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787915	2541284	2539362	277797	275928	SPBC947.08c	SPCC18B5.10c	hip4	SPCC18B5.10c	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934208055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787916	2541284	2539809	277797	276359	SPBC947.08c	SPBC16E9.02c	hip4	SPBC16E9.02c	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928538526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787917	2541284	2543628	277797	280042	SPBC947.08c	SPAC3H8.10	hip4	spo20	hpc2	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.282983575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787918	2541284	2539555	277797	276116	SPBC947.08c	SPCC4B3.08	hip4	lsg1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.423225432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787919	2541284	2539157	277797	275729	SPBC947.08c	SPCC1919.12c	hip4	SPCC1919.12c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.940080148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787920	2541284	2543071	277797	279504	SPBC947.08c	SPAC3C7.06c	hip4	pit1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.619825448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787921	2541284	2543567	277797	279983	SPBC947.08c	SPAC890.03	hip4	ppk16	hpc2	mug92	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77250042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787922	2541284	2541909	277797	278399	SPBC947.08c	SPAC227.01c	hip4	erd1	hpc2	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.028706642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787923	2541284	2542881	277797	279326	SPBC947.08c	SPAC13F5.03c	hip4	gld1	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.466736988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787924	2541284	2539600	277797	276158	SPBC947.08c	SPCP1E11.03	hip4	mug170	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.685533428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787925	2541284	2542515	277797	278973	SPBC947.08c	SPAC1952.09c	hip4	SPAC1952.09c	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.61469474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787926	2541284	2540800	277797	277319	SPBC947.08c	SPBC409.20c	hip4	psh3	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.006806144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787927	2541284	2542541	277797	278998	SPBC947.08c	SPAC1B3.03c	hip4	wis2	hpc2	cyp5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.979920509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787928	2541284	2538966	277797	275540	SPBC947.08c	SPCC18.10	hip4	SPCC18.10	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.272942499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787929	2541284	2540998	277797	277514	SPBC947.08c	SPBC3D6.05	hip4	ptp4	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.133078811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787930	2541284	2542940	277797	279381	SPBC947.08c	SPAC31A2.12	hip4	SPAC31A2.12	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.539094132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787931	2541284	2542294	277797	278762	SPBC947.08c	SPAC1805.09c	hip4	fmt1	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807197464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787932	2541284	2538714	277797	275298	SPBC947.08c	SPCC330.11	hip4	btb1	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870416035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787933	2541284	2540935	277797	277451	SPBC947.08c	SPBC359.04c	hip4	pfl7	hpc2	SPBC359.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322174028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787934	2541284	2541432	277797	277937	SPBC947.08c	SPAC1F5.05c	hip4	mso1	hpc2	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.418756564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787935	2541284	2541816	277797	278307	SPBC947.08c	SPAC22E12.01	hip4	pet3	hpc2	SPAC22E12.01|SPAC890.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932597083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787936	2541284	2543662	277797	280076	SPBC947.08c	SPAC9.07c	hip4	SPAC9.07c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.832541818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787937	2541284	2542355	277797	278820	SPBC947.08c	SPAC29A4.13	hip4	SPAC29A4.13	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815658133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787938	2541284	2541470	277797	277972	SPBC947.08c	SPAPYUG7.04c	hip4	rpb9	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.971045531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787939	2541284	2539359	277797	275925	SPBC947.08c	SPCC16C4.06c	hip4	pus3	hpc2	SPCC16C4.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.740009496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787940	2541284	2539136	277797	275708	SPBC947.08c	SPCC1919.05	hip4	SPCC1919.05	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516840804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787941	2541284	2542418	277797	278881	SPBC947.08c	SPAC1805.07c	hip4	dad2	hpc2	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506985971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787942	2541284	2538915	277797	275492	SPBC947.08c	SPCC23B6.02c	hip4	SPCC23B6.02c	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.610738359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787943	2541284	2543377	277797	279799	SPBC947.08c	SPAC3H1.07	hip4	aru1	hpc2	car3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.567454585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787944	2541284	2540677	277797	277202	SPBC947.08c	SPBC21B10.03c	hip4	ath1	hpc2	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.064307089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787945	2541284	2542326	277797	278792	SPBC947.08c	SPAC16C9.07	hip4	pom2	hpc2	SPAC2G11.01|mug189|ppk5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.384703382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787946	2541284	2539514	277797	276076	SPBC947.08c	SPCC663.14c	hip4	trp663	hpc2	SPCC663.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.125660468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787947	2541284	2543091	277797	279524	SPBC947.08c	SPAC12G12.15	hip4	sif3	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.724046245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787948	2541284	2539722	277797	276275	SPBC947.08c	SPBC14F5.11c	hip4	mug186	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929530716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787949	2541284	2539188	277797	275759	SPBC947.08c	SPCC1827.04	hip4	vms1	hpc2	SPCC1827.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322789103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787950	2541284	2539668	277797	276223	SPBC947.08c	SPBC11B10.10c	hip4	pht1	hpc2	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.157463581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787951	2541284	2542635	277797	279089	SPBC947.08c	SPAC24H6.09	hip4	gef1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.377890315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787952	2541284	2540182	277797	276715	SPBC947.08c	SPBC16G5.06	hip4	SPBC16G5.06	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.120203592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787953	2541284	2543420	277797	279842	SPBC947.08c	SPAC3H1.04c	hip4	mdm31	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.067570524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787954	2541284	2542574	277797	279030	SPBC947.08c	SPAC186.05c	hip4	SPAC186.05c	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.258848228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787955	2541284	2542693	277797	279146	SPBC947.08c	SPAC27D7.09c	hip4	SPAC27D7.09c	hpc2	SPAC27D7.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.463323851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787956	2541284	2540920	277797	277436	SPBC947.08c	SPBC342.03	hip4	gas4	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.843721849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787957	2541284	2540992	277797	277508	SPBC947.08c	SPBC342.05	hip4	crb2	hpc2	rhp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042664081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787958	2541284	2540927	277797	277443	SPBC947.08c	SPBC365.06	hip4	pmt3	hpc2	smt3|ubl2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.880757223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787959	2541284	2542262	277797	278731	SPBC947.08c	SPAC17C9.10	hip4	stm1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.065388425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787960	2541284	2542250	277797	278720	SPBC947.08c	SPAC17D4.03c	hip4	cis4	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980036635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787961	2541284	2539207	277797	275777	SPBC947.08c	SPCC285.09c	hip4	cgs2	hpc2	pde1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2688422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787962	2541284	2539702	277797	276255	SPBC947.08c	SPBC1604.12	hip4	SPBC1604.12	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.669865645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787963	2541284	2540489	277797	277017	SPBC947.08c	SPBC25H2.03	hip4	SPBC25H2.03	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196865058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787964	2541284	2539726	277797	276278	SPBC947.08c	SPBC13E7.08c	hip4	leo1	hpc2	SPBC13E7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327176736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787965	2541284	2539375	277797	275941	SPBC947.08c	SPCC4G3.11	hip4	mug154	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.867289282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787966	2541284	2542186	277797	278661	SPBC947.08c	SPAC17C9.14	hip4	SPAC17C9.14	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.62956081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787967	2541284	2540551	277797	277078	SPBC947.08c	SPBC23E6.01c	hip4	cxr1	hpc2	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.256903058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787968	2541284	2543380	277797	279802	SPBC947.08c	SPAC4G9.16c	hip4	rpl901	hpc2	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.287236327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787969	2541284	2539189	277797	275760	SPBC947.08c	SPCC1682.16	hip4	rpt4	hpc2	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.157118873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787970	2541284	2539178	277797	275749	SPBC947.08c	SPCC1682.14	hip4	rpl1902	hpc2	rpl19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378048639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787971	2541284	2543337	277797	279760	SPBC947.08c	SPAC959.08	hip4	rpl2102	hpc2	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.879264037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787972	2541284	2542021	277797	278504	SPBC947.08c	SPAP14E8.02	hip4	tos4	hpc2	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.496472652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787973	2541284	2539169	277797	275740	SPBC947.08c	SPCC1235.11	hip4	mpc1	hpc2	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.747140888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787974	2541284	2538861	277797	275441	SPBC947.08c	SPCC1620.11	hip4	nup97	hpc2	mug87	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.127540947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787975	2541284	2541238	277797	277752	SPBC947.08c	SPBC8E4.05c	hip4	SPBC8E4.05c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.911464727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787976	2541284	2543513	277797	279931	SPBC947.08c	SPAC821.06	hip4	spn2	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.116971669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787977	2541284	2543400	277797	279822	SPBC947.08c	SPAC3G9.11c	hip4	SPAC3G9.11c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.87436082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787978	2541284	2543384	277797	279806	SPBC947.08c	SPAC637.06	hip4	gmh5	hpc2	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388257399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787979	2541284	2543277	277797	279705	SPBC947.08c	SPAC1002.03c	hip4	gls2	hpc2	gls2alpha	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.438377574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787980	2541284	2540409	277797	276937	SPBC947.08c	SPBC2D10.11c	hip4	nap2	hpc2	nap1.2|nap12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567335786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787981	2541284	2543387	277797	279809	SPBC947.08c	SPAPB1E7.02c	hip4	mcl1	hpc2	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.123488436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787982	2541284	2543327	277797	279750	SPBC947.08c	SPAC1D4.06c	hip4	csk1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.890471549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787983	2541284	2541627	277797	278123	SPBC947.08c	SPAC1F5.08c	hip4	yam8	hpc2	ehs1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868989533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787984	2541284	2543471	277797	279891	SPBC947.08c	SPAC513.07	hip4	SPAC513.07	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.667695752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787985	2541284	2543087	277797	279520	SPBC947.08c	SPAC30C2.04	hip4	SPAC30C2.04	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.264150324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787986	2541284	2539014	277797	275587	SPBC947.08c	SPCC18B5.05c	hip4	SPCC18B5.05c	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193517147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787987	2541284	2542175	277797	278650	SPBC947.08c	SPAC1F3.02c	hip4	mkh1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.299669247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787988	2541284	2542830	277797	279277	SPBC947.08c	SPAC57A10.08c	hip4	SPAC57A10.08c	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.408335026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787989	2541284	2540558	277797	277085	SPBC947.08c	SPBC2D10.17	hip4	clr1	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.715643615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787990	2541284	2539583	277797	276142	SPBC947.08c	SPCC777.04	hip4	SPCC777.04	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.99400833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787991	2541284	2542399	277797	278863	SPBC947.08c	SPAC1805.10	hip4	SPAC1805.10	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.203299665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787992	2541284	2542424	277797	278886	SPBC947.08c	SPAC1805.14	hip4	SPAC1805.14	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.951788695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787993	2541284	2541867	277797	278357	SPBC947.08c	SPAC22E12.14c	hip4	sck2	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812401503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787994	2541284	2539588	277797	276146	SPBC947.08c	SPCC962.04	hip4	rps1201	hpc2	rps12|rps12-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779962382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787995	2541284	2541502	277797	278004	SPBC947.08c	SPAC23D3.04c	hip4	gpd2	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873532038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787996	2541284	2541808	277797	278299	SPBC947.08c	SPAC22A12.14c	hip4	SPAC22A12.14c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570923136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787997	2541284	2539710	277797	276263	SPBC947.08c	SPBC1683.08	hip4	ght4	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.318537279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787998	2541284	2543644	277797	280058	SPBC947.08c	SPAPB1A10.03	hip4	nxt1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38082008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
787999	2541284	2542111	277797	278587	SPBC947.08c	SPAC1687.14c	hip4	SPAC1687.14c	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.326578086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788000	2541284	2538696	277797	275281	SPBC947.08c	SPCC569.06	hip4	SPCC569.06	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389254857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788001	2541284	2540309	277797	276839	SPBC947.08c	SPBC21B10.13c	hip4	yox1	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.610533289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788002	2541284	2539211	277797	275781	SPBC947.08c	SPCC1739.08c	hip4	SPCC1739.08c	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876440382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788003	2541284	2543472	277797	279892	SPBC947.08c	SPAC959.04c	hip4	omh6	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.067933277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788004	2541284	2542680	277797	279133	SPBC947.08c	SPAC26F1.09	hip4	gyp51	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.341445768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788005	2541284	2539599	277797	276157	SPBC947.08c	SPCP31B10.02	hip4	SPCP31B10.02	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869048313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788006	2541284	2543646	277797	280060	SPBC947.08c	SPAC821.07c	hip4	moc3	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.457392363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788007	2541284	2540208	277797	276741	SPBC947.08c	SPBC9B6.03	hip4	SPBC9B6.03	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.516402469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788008	2541284	2543463	277797	279883	SPBC947.08c	SPAPB21F2.03	hip4	slx9	hpc2	SPAPB21F2.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.402550827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788009	2541284	2539148	277797	275720	SPBC947.08c	SPCC132.04c	hip4	gdh2	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.460494561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788010	2541284	2540787	277797	277306	SPBC947.08c	SPBC1921.07c	hip4	sgf29	hpc2	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.401950525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788011	2541284	2540798	277797	277317	SPBC947.08c	SPBC19C7.01	hip4	mni1	hpc2	SPBC32F12.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.817773474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788012	2541284	2542879	277797	279324	SPBC947.08c	SPAC13G7.07	hip4	arb2	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.26399781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788013	2541284	2542571	277797	279027	SPBC947.08c	SPAC589.02c	hip4	med13	hpc2	spTrap240|srb9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.538740331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788014	2541284	2540649	277797	277174	SPBC947.08c	SPBC19F8.08	hip4	rps401	hpc2	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.908338445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788015	2541284	2538730	277797	275314	SPBC947.08c	SPCC31H12.02c	hip4	mug73	hpc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816485217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788016	2541284	2540736	277797	277259	SPBC947.08c	SPBC19F8.02	hip4	SPBC19F8.02	hpc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.702010003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788017	2539236	2539452	275806	276015	SPCC1672.08c	SPCC70.03c	tfa2	SPCC70.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.410639946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788018	2539236	2539008	275806	275581	SPCC1672.08c	SPCC584.03c	tfa2	SPCC584.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.880067856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788019	2539236	2540491	275806	277019	SPCC1672.08c	SPBC28E12.04	tfa2	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873848014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788020	2539236	2541682	275806	278178	SPCC1672.08c	SPAC15F9.02	tfa2	seh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814152776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788021	2539236	2543292	275806	279717	SPCC1672.08c	SPAC6C3.02c	tfa2	SPAC6C3.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.270871989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788022	2539236	2540893	275806	277409	SPCC1672.08c	SPBC543.10	tfa2	get1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.743818652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788023	2539236	2543514	275806	279932	SPCC1672.08c	SPAC4D7.03	tfa2	pop2	-	sud1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979860788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788024	2539236	2542971	275806	279410	SPCC1672.08c	SPAC105.02c	tfa2	SPAC105.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094576736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788025	2539236	2541713	275806	278208	SPCC1672.08c	SPAC3A12.12	tfa2	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81930764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788026	2539236	2539908	275806	276454	SPCC1672.08c	SPBC13E7.06	tfa2	msd1	-	mug172	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872017824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788027	2539236	2541376	275806	277887	SPCC1672.08c	SPBP8B7.04	tfa2	mug45	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093770396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788028	2539236	2542326	275806	278792	SPCC1672.08c	SPAC16C9.07	tfa2	pom2	-	SPAC2G11.01|mug189|ppk5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866350531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788029	2539236	3361410	275806	280486	SPCC1672.08c	SPAC1527.01	tfa2	mok11	-	SPAC23D3.15	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865428858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788030	2542652	2538939	279106	275514	SPAC1687.15	SPCC1672.04c	gsk3	SPCC1672.04c	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.313365302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788031	2542652	2539050	279106	275623	SPAC1687.15	SPCC11E10.08	gsk3	rik1	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.451476294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788032	2542652	2540279	279106	276810	SPAC1687.15	SPBC3B8.04c	gsk3	SPBC3B8.04c	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324074859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788033	2542652	2542895	279106	279339	SPAC1687.15	SPAC13G6.10c	gsk3	asl1	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.880321147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788034	2542652	2539930	279106	276474	SPAC1687.15	SPBC1198.11c	gsk3	reb1	skp1	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.467483325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788035	2542652	3361561	279106	280637	SPAC1687.15	SPAC11E3.01c	gsk3	swr1	skp1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.889279304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788036	2542652	2541117	279106	277632	SPAC1687.15	SPBC646.13	gsk3	sds23	skp1	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.555647212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788037	2542652	2542701	279106	279154	SPAC1687.15	SPAC26H5.05	gsk3	mga2	skp1	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.331192655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788038	2542652	2538922	279106	275499	SPAC1687.15	SPCC16C4.10	gsk3	SPCC16C4.10	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.966394404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788039	2542652	2539434	279106	275997	SPAC1687.15	SPCC757.09c	gsk3	rnc1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.821897871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788040	2542652	2540220	279106	276753	SPAC1687.15	SPBC337.03	gsk3	rhn1	skp1	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.017316579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788041	2542652	2543319	279106	279743	SPAC1687.15	SPAC6B12.09	gsk3	trm10	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.074932721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788042	2542652	2542568	279106	279024	SPAC1687.15	SPAC1952.02	gsk3	tma23	skp1	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.203334937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788043	2542652	2541885	279106	278375	SPAC1687.15	SPAC22H10.03c	gsk3	kap114	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.889001746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788044	2542652	2540797	279106	277316	SPAC1687.15	SPBC18H10.11c	gsk3	ppr2	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.559997078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788045	2542652	2539845	279106	276393	SPAC1687.15	SPBC12C2.02c	gsk3	ste20	skp1	ste16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149884036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788046	2542652	2542469	279106	278930	SPAC1687.15	SPAC19A8.04	gsk3	erg5	skp1	cyp61	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.899014579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788047	2542652	2543406	279106	279828	SPAC1687.15	SPAC9.12c	gsk3	atp12	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319503373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788048	2542652	2540019	279106	276563	SPAC1687.15	SPBC1685.01	gsk3	pmp1	skp1	dsp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988689201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788049	2542652	2541713	279106	278208	SPAC1687.15	SPAC3A12.12	gsk3	atp11	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.101554767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788050	2542652	2540531	279106	277059	SPAC1687.15	SPBC23E6.08	gsk3	sat1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.141172693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788051	2542652	2543662	279106	280076	SPAC1687.15	SPAC9.07c	gsk3	SPAC9.07c	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.619806351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788052	2542652	2542458	279106	278919	SPAC1687.15	SPAC30.02c	gsk3	SPAC30.02c	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200899025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788053	2542652	2541531	279106	278031	SPAC1687.15	SPAC25A8.01c	gsk3	fft3	skp1	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.040546418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788054	2542652	2542306	279106	278773	SPAC1687.15	SPAC29A4.11	gsk3	rga3	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.474976715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788055	2542652	2542418	279106	278881	SPAC1687.15	SPAC1805.07c	gsk3	dad2	skp1	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.074225088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788056	2542652	2542222	279106	278695	SPAC1687.15	SPAC31G5.18c	gsk3	sde2	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322992875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788057	2542652	2540555	279106	277082	SPAC1687.15	SPBP16F5.02	gsk3	mcs2	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.541222014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788058	2542652	2538840	279106	275421	SPAC1687.15	SPCC736.07c	gsk3	SPCC736.07c	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579867943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788059	2542463	2543529	278924	279947	SPAC1834.03c	SPAC4C5.02c	hhf1	ryh1	h4.1	hos1|sat7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.719561449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788060	2542463	2542378	278924	278842	SPAC1834.03c	SPAC1805.04	hhf1	nup132	h4.1	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.214304034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788061	2542463	2541117	278924	277632	SPAC1834.03c	SPBC646.13	hhf1	sds23	h4.1	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.999979858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788062	2542463	2541200	278924	277714	SPAC1834.03c	SPBC8D2.03c	hhf1	hhf2	h4.1	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.57962757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788063	2542463	2539733	278924	276285	SPAC1834.03c	SPBC16E9.12c	hhf1	pab2	h4.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.814270687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788064	2542463	2542659	278924	279112	SPAC1834.03c	SPAC25B8.08	hhf1	SPAC25B8.08	h4.1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926412441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788065	2542463	2542014	278924	278497	SPAC1834.03c	SPAC20H4.04	hhf1	fml2	h4.1	mfh2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041087205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788066	2542463	2541900	278924	278390	SPAC1834.03c	SPAC23H4.17c	hhf1	srb10	h4.1	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.553259086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788067	2542463	2540967	278924	277483	SPAC1834.03c	SPBC36B7.08c	hhf1	SPBC36B7.08c	h4.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.471886659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788068	2542463	2543390	278924	279812	SPAC1834.03c	SPAC631.01c	hhf1	acp2	h4.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581351663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788069	2542463	2539527	278924	276089	SPAC1834.03c	SPCC338.16	hhf1	pof3	h4.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.056087655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788070	2542463	2542453	278924	278914	SPAC1834.03c	SPAC186.01	hhf1	pfl9	h4.1	SPAC186.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.851269564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788071	2542463	2542869	278924	279314	SPAC1834.03c	SPAC140.02	hhf1	gar2	h4.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449267754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788072	2542463	2541786	278924	278278	SPAC1834.03c	SPAC22F3.08c	hhf1	rok1	h4.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699957943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788073	2542463	3361389	278924	280465	SPAC1834.03c	SPAC977.13c	hhf1	SPAC977.13c	h4.1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.915373275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788074	2542463	2541175	278924	277689	SPAC1834.03c	SPBC839.13c	hhf1	rpl1601	h4.1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510040436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788075	2542463	2540498	278924	277026	SPAC1834.03c	SPBC27.02c	hhf1	ask1	h4.1	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.112926977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788076	2542463	2543136	278924	279568	SPAC1834.03c	SPBC1348.07	hhf1	SPBC1348.07	h4.1	SPAC1348.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154238423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788077	2542463	2542418	278924	278881	SPAC1834.03c	SPAC1805.07c	hhf1	dad2	h4.1	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.771375576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788078	2542463	2542574	278924	279030	SPAC1834.03c	SPAC186.05c	hhf1	SPAC186.05c	h4.1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.456089502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788079	2542463	2543387	278924	279809	SPAC1834.03c	SPAPB1E7.02c	hhf1	mcl1	h4.1	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.12523053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788080	2538700	2540220	275285	276753	SPCC645.13	SPBC337.03	SPCC645.13	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.472439229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788081	2538700	2542126	275285	278602	SPCC645.13	SPAC1B3.05	SPCC645.13	not3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.049044833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788082	2538700	2538690	275285	275275	SPCC645.13	SPCC1393.05	SPCC645.13	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445582494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788083	2538700	2541488	275285	277990	SPCC645.13	SPAC227.17c	SPCC645.13	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.564585721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788084	2538700	2541531	275285	278031	SPCC645.13	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC645.13	fft3	-	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.204822306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788085	2538700	2541050	275285	277565	SPCC645.13	SPBC428.05c	SPCC645.13	arg12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.103556413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788086	2541078	2542568	277593	279024	SPBC409.18	SPAC1952.02	SPBC409.18	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.334153505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788087	2541078	2540086	277593	276624	SPBC409.18	SPBC16H5.12c	SPBC409.18	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639849852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788088	2541078	2543315	277593	279739	SPBC409.18	SPAC6B12.07c	SPBC409.18	SPAC6B12.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811523239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788089	2541078	2540229	277593	276761	SPBC409.18	SPBC31F10.15c	SPBC409.18	atp15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.404348132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788090	2541078	2540164	277593	276699	SPBC409.18	SPBC1683.03c	SPBC409.18	SPBC1683.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099291469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788091	2541078	2541757	277593	278251	SPBC409.18	SPAC2F7.10	SPBC409.18	akr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992441162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788092	2541078	2541806	277593	278297	SPBC409.18	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC409.18	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.380342496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788093	2541078	2543327	277593	279750	SPBC409.18	SPAC1D4.06c	SPBC409.18	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511651572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788094	2543481	2538801	279901	275382	SPAPB2B4.03	SPCC285.13c	cig2	nup60	cyc17	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378966568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788095	2543481	2541424	279901	277929	SPAPB2B4.03	SPAC23G3.04	cig2	ies4	cyc17	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391709303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788096	2543481	2542268	279901	278737	SPAPB2B4.03	SPAC17A5.07c	cig2	ulp2	cyc17	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.502312222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788097	2543481	2541929	279901	278417	SPAPB2B4.03	SPAC23C4.12	cig2	hhp2	cyc17	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504694672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788098	2543481	2540374	279901	276903	SPAPB2B4.03	SPBC31F10.02	cig2	SPBC31F10.02	cyc17	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851321469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788099	2543481	2542883	279901	279328	SPAPB2B4.03	SPAC1486.04c	cig2	alm1	cyc17	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645503792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788100	2543481	2541797	279901	278288	SPAPB2B4.03	SPAC22F3.04	cig2	mug62	cyc17	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.768952963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788101	2543481	2542021	279901	278504	SPAPB2B4.03	SPAP14E8.02	cig2	tos4	cyc17	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.376774528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788102	2543481	2540309	279901	276839	SPAPB2B4.03	SPBC21B10.13c	cig2	yox1	cyc17	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.39018383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788103	2540917	2540131	277433	276668	SPBC409.05	SPBC1778.05c	skp1	SPBC1778.05c	psh1|sph1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.421414329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788104	2540917	2542759	277433	279209	SPBC409.05	SPAC9G1.07	skp1	SPAC9G1.07	psh1|sph1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.245869619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788105	2540917	2543387	277433	279809	SPBC409.05	SPAPB1E7.02c	skp1	mcl1	psh1|sph1	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.03176132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788106	2542162	2542268	278638	278737	SPAC6F6.08c	SPAC17A5.07c	cdc16	ulp2	bub2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.851572353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788107	2542162	2542177	278638	278652	SPAC6F6.08c	SPAC17H9.08	cdc16	SPAC17H9.08	bub2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.885683289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788108	2542162	2540150	278638	276687	SPAC6F6.08c	SPBC16E9.14c	cdc16	zrg17	bub2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.393456269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788109	2542162	2539847	278638	276395	SPAC6F6.08c	SPBC530.14c	cdc16	dsk1	bub2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.056796144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788110	2542106	2541512	278582	278013	SPAC8E11.03c	SPAC11E3.08c	dmc1	nse6	dmp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981624142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788111	2542106	2540474	278582	277002	SPAC8E11.03c	SPBC26H8.09c	dmc1	snf59	dmp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143101948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788112	2542106	2543572	278582	279987	SPAC8E11.03c	SPAC4G8.04	dmc1	SPAC4G8.04	dmp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704809813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788113	2542106	2540975	278582	277491	SPAC8E11.03c	SPBC354.12	dmc1	gpd3	dmp1	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.126047842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788114	2542106	2543260	278582	279688	SPAC8E11.03c	SPAC1002.17c	dmc1	urg2	dmp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.877628109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788115	2542106	2542689	278582	279142	SPAC8E11.03c	SPAC29B12.04	dmc1	snz1	dmp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.61811096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788116	2542106	2539256	278582	275826	SPAC8E11.03c	SPCC285.04	dmc1	SPCC285.04	dmp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.463867095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788117	2542106	2541026	278582	277541	SPAC8E11.03c	SPBC337.09	dmc1	erg28	dmp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.740926448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788118	2542106	2542277	278582	278746	SPAC8E11.03c	SPAC17A5.02c	dmc1	dbr1	dmp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.274925949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788119	2542106	2540663	278582	277188	SPAC8E11.03c	SPBC56F2.06	dmc1	mug147	dmp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874698032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788120	2542106	2539310	278582	275877	SPAC8E11.03c	SPCC285.17	dmc1	spp27	dmp1	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711974974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788121	2542106	2538821	278582	275402	SPAC8E11.03c	SPCC584.01c	dmc1	SPCC584.01c	dmp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.9897451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788122	2542106	2541250	278582	277764	SPAC8E11.03c	SPBC8D2.17	dmc1	gmh4	dmp1	SPBC8D2.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816601394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788123	2542106	2542105	278582	278581	SPAC8E11.03c	SPAC14C4.15c	dmc1	SPAC14C4.15c	dmp1	SPAPJ760.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.01204873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788124	2542106	2541784	278582	278277	SPAC8E11.03c	SPAC2E1P3.01	dmc1	SPAC2E1P3.01	dmp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391474251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788125	2542106	2543412	278582	279834	SPAC8E11.03c	SPAC637.07	dmc1	moe1	dmp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.269912912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788126	2542106	2540673	278582	277198	SPAC8E11.03c	SPBC1D7.03	dmc1	mug80	dmp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820585187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788127	2542106	2541911	278582	278401	SPAC8E11.03c	SPAC212.04c	dmc1	SPAC212.04c	dmp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81242932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788128	2542106	2542989	278582	279427	SPAC8E11.03c	SPAC11E3.13c	dmc1	gas5	dmp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569386763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788129	2542106	2539168	278582	275739	SPAC8E11.03c	SPCC1620.08	dmc1	SPCC1620.08	dmp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57190235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788130	2542106	2540326	278582	276856	SPAC8E11.03c	SPBC2G5.06c	dmc1	hmt2	dmp1	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387124073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788131	2542106	2543367	278582	279789	SPAC8E11.03c	SPAC3H1.10	dmc1	pcs2	dmp1	SPAC3H1.10|pcs	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.705088326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788132	2542106	2542254	278582	278724	SPAC8E11.03c	SPAC30D11.04c	dmc1	nup124	dmp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866226623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788133	2542106	2542549	278582	279006	SPAC8E11.03c	SPAC19A8.11c	dmc1	SPAC19A8.11c	dmp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.666518294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788134	2542106	2539481	278582	276044	SPAC8E11.03c	SPCC622.16c	dmc1	epe1	dmp1	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.31956871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788135	2542106	2541009	278582	277524	SPAC8E11.03c	SPBC428.04	dmc1	apq12	dmp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645571223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788136	2542106	2539715	278582	276268	SPAC8E11.03c	SPBC1778.09	dmc1	SPBC1778.09	dmp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.19250824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788137	2542106	2541142	278582	277657	SPAC8E11.03c	SPBC725.04	dmc1	SPBC725.04	dmp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.680010444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788138	2542106	2543307	278582	279731	SPAC8E11.03c	SPAC694.05c	dmc1	rps2502	dmp1	rps25|rps25-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.055645327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788139	2542106	2542865	278582	279310	SPAC8E11.03c	SPAC144.01	dmc1	SPAC144.01	dmp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.376251417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788140	2542106	2543331	278582	279754	SPAC8E11.03c	SPAC56E4.07	dmc1	SPAC56E4.07	dmp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.687390612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788141	2542106	2542869	278582	279314	SPAC8E11.03c	SPAC140.02	dmc1	gar2	dmp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455701984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788142	2542106	2539160	278582	275732	SPAC8E11.03c	SPCC18.17c	dmc1	SPCC18.17c	dmp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516495184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788143	2542106	2543600	278582	280015	SPAC8E11.03c	SPAPB1A10.05	dmc1	SPAPB1A10.05	dmp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.567636248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788144	2542106	2543304	278582	279728	SPAC8E11.03c	SPAC6B12.12	dmc1	tom70	dmp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09448072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788145	2542106	2538966	278582	275540	SPAC8E11.03c	SPCC18.10	dmc1	SPCC18.10	dmp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640019938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788146	2542106	2542294	278582	278762	SPAC8E11.03c	SPAC1805.09c	dmc1	fmt1	dmp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383603188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788147	2542106	2541459	278582	277961	SPAC8E11.03c	SPAC227.11c	dmc1	SPAC227.11c	dmp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.138716302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788148	2542106	2540677	278582	277202	SPAC8E11.03c	SPBC21B10.03c	dmc1	ath1	dmp1	SPBC21B10.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816597368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788149	2542106	2541380	278582	277891	SPAC8E11.03c	SPBPB2B2.13	dmc1	gal1	dmp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090543751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788150	2542106	2540808	278582	277327	SPAC8E11.03c	SPBC418.02	dmc1	SPBC418.02	dmp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512934955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788151	2542106	2543220	278582	279648	SPAC8E11.03c	SPAPB21F2.02	dmc1	SPAPB21F2.02	dmp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446116434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788152	2542106	2541491	278582	277993	SPAC8E11.03c	SPAC2C4.16c	dmc1	rps801	dmp1	rps8|rps8-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195745229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788153	2542106	3361295	278582	280371	SPAC8E11.03c	SPBC1921.01c	dmc1	rpl35b	dmp1	rpl37|rpl37-1|rpl3701|SPBC29C10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.985621513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788154	2540735	2542207	277258	278682	SPBC83.03c	SPAC17H9.10c	tas3	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707713184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788155	2540735	2539034	277258	275607	SPBC83.03c	SPCC830.10	tas3	ham1	-	SPCC830.10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446625955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788156	2540735	2538796	277258	275377	SPBC83.03c	SPCC63.06	tas3	SPCC63.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256450222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788157	2540735	2542862	277258	279308	SPBC83.03c	SPAC140.03	tas3	arb1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.748915359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788158	2540735	2540060	277258	276598	SPBC83.03c	SPBC106.01	tas3	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.16070826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788159	2540735	2542430	277258	278892	SPBC83.03c	SPAC17G6.06	tas3	rps2401	-	rps24|rps24-1|rps24a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389111779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788160	2540735	2541728	277258	278222	SPBC83.03c	SPAC20G4.03c	tas3	hri1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149914312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788161	2540735	2542382	277258	278846	SPBC83.03c	SPAC6G10.06	tas3	SPAC6G10.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047626325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788162	2540735	2541971	277258	278456	SPBC83.03c	SPAC27F1.05c	tas3	SPAC27F1.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.264788133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788163	2540735	2542390	277258	278854	SPBC83.03c	SPAC6F6.11c	tas3	SPAC6F6.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.559006802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788164	2540735	2539452	277258	276015	SPBC83.03c	SPCC70.03c	tas3	SPCC70.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.97953677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788165	2540735	2539940	277258	276484	SPBC83.03c	SPBC16A3.10	tas3	SPBC16A3.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045493027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788166	2540735	2542127	277258	278603	SPBC83.03c	SPAC1952.12c	tas3	csn71	-	csn7|csn7a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.614696282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788167	2540735	2540131	277258	276668	SPBC83.03c	SPBC1778.05c	tas3	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.834300915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788168	2540735	2542643	277258	279097	SPBC83.03c	SPAC2C4.07c	tas3	dis32	-	SPAC2C4.07c|dis3L2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703825103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788169	2540735	2539582	277258	276141	SPBC83.03c	SPCC594.07c	tas3	bqt3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.983218286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788170	2540735	2541650	277258	278146	SPBC83.03c	SPAC14C4.12c	tas3	laf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.62694987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788171	2540735	2540863	277258	277380	SPBC83.03c	SPBC56F2.03	tas3	SPBC56F2.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.275615417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788172	2540735	2540995	277258	277511	SPBC83.03c	SPBC337.16	tas3	cho1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580473963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788173	2540735	2543592	277258	280007	SPBC83.03c	SPAC4F10.18	tas3	nup37	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.568283071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788174	2540735	2541135	277258	277650	SPBC83.03c	SPBC839.03c	tas3	SPBC839.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.264121821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788175	2540735	2542237	277258	278709	SPBC83.03c	SPAC19E9.02	tas3	fin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449392765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788176	2540735	2539202	277258	275773	SPBC83.03c	SPCC162.10	tas3	ppk33	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922913807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788177	2540735	2541130	277258	277645	SPBC83.03c	SPBC776.11	tas3	rpl2801	-	rpl28-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.319652308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788178	2540735	2541438	277258	277943	SPBC83.03c	SPAC23G3.10c	tas3	ssr3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981352404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788179	2540735	2541853	277258	278344	SPBC83.03c	SPAC2F3.11	tas3	SPAC2F3.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.494723279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788180	2540735	2541002	277258	277517	SPBC83.03c	SPBC3E7.07c	tas3	SPBC3E7.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927219888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788181	2540735	2540433	277258	276961	SPBC83.03c	SPBC2D10.06	tas3	rep1	-	rec16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449594182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788182	2540735	2542798	277258	279246	SPBC83.03c	SPAC13C5.06c	tas3	mug121	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.326017463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788183	2540735	2541856	277258	278347	SPBC83.03c	SPAC23H3.08c	tas3	bub3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.153759161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788184	2540735	2542470	277258	278931	SPBC83.03c	SPAC19G12.04	tas3	dal1	-	SPAC19G12.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988204934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788185	2540735	2543594	277258	280009	SPBC83.03c	SPAC8F11.05c	tas3	mug130	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.344258249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788186	2540735	2539196	277258	275767	SPBC83.03c	SPCC1795.03	tas3	gms1	-	gmn3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.464898591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788187	2540735	2541633	277258	278129	SPBC83.03c	SPAC664.01c	tas3	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.638321714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788188	2540735	2541733	277258	278227	SPBC83.03c	SPAC27F1.03c	tas3	uch1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145667574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788189	2540735	2542492	277258	278951	SPBC83.03c	SPAC1B9.02c	tas3	sck1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.611177786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788190	2540735	2542103	277258	278579	SPBC83.03c	SPAC31G5.11	tas3	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.689782503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788191	2540735	2540717	277258	277240	SPBC83.03c	SPBC577.12	tas3	dph6	-	mug71	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321177288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788192	2540735	2538710	277258	275294	SPBC83.03c	SPCC1020.12c	tas3	xap5	-	SPCC14G10.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330221694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788193	2540735	2542613	277258	279067	SPBC83.03c	SPAC18B11.03c	tas3	SPAC18B11.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868258428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788194	2540735	2538806	277258	275387	SPBC83.03c	SPCC1840.09	tas3	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.145468278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788195	2540735	2541316	277258	277828	SPBC83.03c	SPBP19A11.02c	tas3	SPBP19A11.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.403068353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788196	2540735	3361570	277258	280646	SPBC83.03c	SPAC750.01	tas3	SPAC750.01	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.338209888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788197	2540735	2539226	277258	275796	SPBC83.03c	SPCC16C4.20c	tas3	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.507990608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788198	2540735	2539420	277258	275985	SPBC83.03c	SPCC970.07c	tas3	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.699756632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788199	2540735	2539564	277258	276125	SPBC83.03c	SPCC550.12	tas3	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.774179736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788200	2540735	2542724	277258	279175	SPBC83.03c	SPAC767.01c	tas3	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.873922495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788201	2540735	2539434	277258	275997	SPBC83.03c	SPCC757.09c	tas3	rnc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101140846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788202	2540735	2539331	277258	275897	SPBC83.03c	SPCC24B10.09	tas3	rps1702	-	rps17|rps17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.447171259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788203	2540735	2539117	277258	275689	SPBC83.03c	SPCC74.06	tas3	mak3	-	phk2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.002496624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788204	2540735	2540727	277258	277250	SPBC83.03c	SPBC1921.03c	tas3	mex67	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.879732779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788205	2540735	2541831	277258	278322	SPBC83.03c	SPAC23G3.03	tas3	sib2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807600119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788206	2540735	2542277	277258	278746	SPBC83.03c	SPAC17A5.02c	tas3	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.500529049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788207	2540735	2541707	277258	278202	SPBC83.03c	SPAC29E6.01	tas3	pof11	-	SPAC30.05|mug156	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.410405071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788208	2540735	2541866	277258	278356	SPBC83.03c	SPAC23H3.11c	tas3	SPAC23H3.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322315084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788209	2540735	2539175	277258	275746	SPBC83.03c	SPCC16C4.01	tas3	sif2	-	SPCC5E4.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.765472018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788210	2540735	2539129	277258	275701	SPBC83.03c	SPCC338.14	tas3	ado1	-	SPCC338.14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.261146728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788211	2540735	2542141	277258	278617	SPBC83.03c	SPAC17C9.05c	tas3	pmc3	-	med27|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045481812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788212	2540735	2542246	277258	278716	SPBC83.03c	SPAC17H9.12c	tas3	SPAC17H9.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.255332496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788213	2540735	2539648	277258	276203	SPBC83.03c	SPBC1198.08	tas3	SPBC1198.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.144044645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788214	2540735	2539961	277258	276505	SPBC83.03c	SPBC1198.09	tas3	ubc16	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.957091512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788215	2540735	3361316	277258	280392	SPBC83.03c	SPBC2D10.03c	tas3	SPBC2D10.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989928865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788216	2540735	2539244	277258	275814	SPBC83.03c	SPCC1672.06c	tas3	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647058508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788217	2540735	2541295	277258	277807	SPBC83.03c	SPBC947.09	tas3	hsp3103	-	SPBC947.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.824624487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788218	2540735	2541522	277258	278023	SPBC83.03c	SPAC23E2.01	tas3	fep1	-	gaf2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205950515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788219	2540735	2543584	277258	279999	SPBC83.03c	SPAPB1E7.11c	tas3	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.841012327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788220	2540735	2541905	277258	278395	SPBC83.03c	SPAC6G9.01c	tas3	SPAC6G9.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382980096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788221	2540735	2538700	277258	275285	SPBC83.03c	SPCC645.13	tas3	SPCC645.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.516482645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788222	2540735	2539092	277258	275664	SPBC83.03c	SPCC1259.08	tas3	SPCC1259.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.507622161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788223	2540735	2542253	277258	278723	SPBC83.03c	SPAC17H9.04c	tas3	SPAC17H9.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767755795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788224	2540735	2542845	277258	279291	SPBC83.03c	SPAC824.04	tas3	SPAC824.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391606315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788225	2540735	2539457	277258	276020	SPBC83.03c	SPCC550.09	tas3	SPCC550.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582685355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788226	2540735	2542034	277258	278516	SPBC83.03c	SPAC27E2.04c	tas3	mug155	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.461278847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788227	2540735	2539478	277258	276041	SPBC83.03c	SPCC550.07	tas3	SPCC550.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.345522193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788228	2540735	2540825	277258	277343	SPBC83.03c	SPBC428.08c	tas3	clr4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.037894092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788229	2540735	2541021	277258	277536	SPBC83.03c	SPBC3B8.10c	tas3	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.065011633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788230	2540735	2542665	277258	279118	SPBC83.03c	SPAC10F6.08c	tas3	nht10	-	nht1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.122689146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788231	2540735	2542568	277258	279024	SPBC83.03c	SPAC1952.02	tas3	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.186878992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788232	2540735	2539960	277258	276504	SPBC83.03c	SPBC15D4.15	tas3	pho2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.505520783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788233	2540735	2542268	277258	278737	SPBC83.03c	SPAC17A5.07c	tas3	ulp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.973897436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788234	2540735	2539056	277258	275629	SPBC83.03c	SPCC126.11c	tas3	SPCC126.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511512994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788235	2540735	2539467	277258	276030	SPBC83.03c	SPCC417.07c	tas3	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.064045771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788236	2540735	2539388	277258	275953	SPBC83.03c	SPCC24B10.12	tas3	cgi121	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.322216199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788237	2540735	2542394	277258	278858	SPBC83.03c	SPAC31G5.12c	tas3	maf1	-	n150	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450640925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788238	2540735	2539804	277258	276354	SPBC83.03c	SPBC1105.11c	tas3	hht3	-	h3.3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044170071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788239	2540735	2543020	277258	279456	SPBC83.03c	SPAC10F6.13c	tas3	SPAC10F6.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.252910341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788240	2540735	2539021	277258	275594	SPBC83.03c	SPCC1183.04c	tas3	pet127	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.192446945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788241	2540735	2540892	277258	277408	SPBC83.03c	SPBC530.01	tas3	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511396736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788242	2540735	2541776	277258	278270	SPBC83.03c	SPAC23H3.05c	tas3	swd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047199197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788243	2540735	2540401	277258	276929	SPBC83.03c	SPBC2A9.02	tas3	SPBC2A9.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.029552481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788244	2540735	2542755	277258	279205	SPBC83.03c	SPAC1687.10	tas3	mcp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090315949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788245	2540735	2540429	277258	276957	SPBC83.03c	SPBC29A10.07	tas3	pom152	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575496598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788246	2540735	3361491	277258	280567	SPBC83.03c	SPAC1805.08	tas3	dlc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809924947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788247	2540735	2542123	277258	278599	SPBC83.03c	SPAC18G6.15	tas3	mal3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.476786459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788248	2540735	2538706	277258	275290	SPBC83.03c	SPCC338.08	tas3	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258207866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788249	2540735	2542544	277258	279001	SPBC83.03c	SPAC18G6.10	tas3	lem2	-	heh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.691061562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788250	2540735	2542507	277258	278965	SPBC83.03c	SPAC18G6.13	tas3	SPAC18G6.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.122529795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788251	2540735	2541543	277258	278043	SPBC83.03c	SPAC5H10.04	tas3	SPAC5H10.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.025595586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788252	2540735	2538800	277258	275381	SPBC83.03c	SPCC1322.06	tas3	kap113	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876855622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788253	2540735	2542420	277258	278883	SPBC83.03c	SPAC19D5.03	tas3	cid1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149731609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788254	2540735	2541889	277258	278379	SPBC83.03c	SPAC2F7.03c	tas3	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.813017961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788255	2540735	2542227	277258	278700	SPBC83.03c	SPAC5H10.13c	tas3	gmh2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444048471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788256	2540735	2539484	277258	276047	SPBC83.03c	SPCC594.04c	tas3	SPCC594.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.69850639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788257	2540735	2539454	277258	276017	SPBC83.03c	SPCC622.15c	tas3	SPCC622.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.004214854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788258	2540735	2541496	277258	277998	SPBC83.03c	SPAC23D3.09	tas3	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.69148291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788259	2540735	2543245	277258	279673	SPBC83.03c	SPAC56F8.06c	tas3	alg10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092606217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788260	2540735	2543118	277258	279550	SPBC83.03c	SPAC3G6.11	tas3	chl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506486974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788261	2540735	2543643	277258	280057	SPBC83.03c	SPAC3G9.07c	tas3	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.127472832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788262	2540735	2541739	277258	278233	SPBC83.03c	SPAC2G11.10c	tas3	SPAC2G11.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.46353714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788263	2540735	2539111	277258	275683	SPBC83.03c	SPCC417.11c	tas3	SPCC417.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504194904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788264	2540735	2541710	277258	278205	SPBC83.03c	SPAC343.11c	tas3	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.13153638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788265	2540735	2541983	277258	278468	SPBC83.03c	SPAC20G8.08c	tas3	fft1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.700008467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788266	2540735	2543406	277258	279828	SPBC83.03c	SPAC9.12c	tas3	atp12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512820118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788267	2540735	2540326	277258	276856	SPBC83.03c	SPBC2G5.06c	tas3	hmt2	-	cad1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935066865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788268	2540735	2541704	277258	278199	SPBC83.03c	SPAC1250.04c	tas3	atl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.818394909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788269	2540735	2541187	277258	277701	SPBC83.03c	SPBC776.14	tas3	plh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.559361941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788270	2540735	2542409	277258	278873	SPBC83.03c	SPAC17G8.10c	tas3	dma1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388557037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788271	2540735	2538769	277258	275352	SPBC83.03c	SPCC126.04c	tas3	sgf73	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0940768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788272	2540735	2539667	277258	276222	SPBC83.03c	SPBC13G1.08c	tas3	ash2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195734543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788273	2540735	2540136	277258	276673	SPBC83.03c	SPBC1347.11	tas3	sro1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.821791599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788274	2540735	2540256	277258	276787	SPBC83.03c	SPBC32F12.12c	tas3	SPBC32F12.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154790018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788275	2540735	2542946	277258	279386	SPBC83.03c	SPAC6F12.03c	tas3	fsv1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984896996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788276	2540735	2538880	277258	275459	SPBC83.03c	SPCC1393.09c	tas3	SPCC1393.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.46078597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788277	2540735	2542933	277258	279374	SPBC83.03c	SPAPYUG7.06	tas3	sdu1	-	mug67|hag1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.15146129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788278	2540735	2540675	277258	277200	SPBC83.03c	SPBC21H7.07c	tas3	his5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196171006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788279	2540735	2541720	277258	278214	SPBC83.03c	SPAC23H3.13c	tas3	gpa2	-	git8	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.404350291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788280	2540735	2543253	277258	279681	SPBC83.03c	SPAC8C9.05	tas3	SPAC8C9.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.063646167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788281	2540735	2541903	277258	278393	SPBC83.03c	SPAC22F8.05	tas3	SPAC22F8.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770958349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788282	2540735	2543357	277258	279779	SPBC83.03c	SPAC688.12c	tas3	SPAC688.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.132268444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788283	2540735	2541900	277258	278390	SPBC83.03c	SPAC23H4.17c	tas3	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322677133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788284	2540735	2543301	277258	279726	SPBC83.03c	SPAC977.17	tas3	SPAC977.17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.26066139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788285	2540735	2542398	277258	278862	SPBC83.03c	SPAC1805.03c	tas3	trm13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922760873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788286	2540735	2539408	277258	275973	SPBC83.03c	SPCC576.12c	tas3	mhf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.622093755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788287	2540735	2542519	277258	278977	SPBC83.03c	SPAC19G12.08	tas3	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.122477967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788288	2540735	2543522	277258	279940	SPBC83.03c	SPAPB24D3.08c	tas3	SPAPB24D3.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143690993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788289	2540735	2541009	277258	277524	SPBC83.03c	SPBC428.04	tas3	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.837545112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788290	2540735	5802861	277258	857999	SPBC83.03c	SPAC1D4.01	tas3	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.560492517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788291	2540735	2539049	277258	275622	SPBC83.03c	SPCC11E10.09c	tas3	SPCC11E10.09c	-	SPCC188.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.745508859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788292	2540735	2539317	277258	275883	SPBC83.03c	SPCC16A11.08	tas3	atg20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809020958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788293	2540735	2540967	277258	277483	SPBC83.03c	SPBC36B7.08c	tas3	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.332534448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788294	2540735	2540599	277258	277125	SPBC83.03c	SPBC29A3.10c	tas3	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.839836624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788295	2540735	2542773	277258	279222	SPBC83.03c	SPAC16.01	tas3	rho2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.272350624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788296	2540735	2542753	277258	279203	SPBC83.03c	SPAC1687.09	tas3	SPAC1687.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574064591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788297	2540735	2539059	277258	275632	SPBC83.03c	SPCC737.06c	tas3	SPCC737.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813850761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788298	2540735	2541614	277258	278111	SPBC83.03c	SPAC29A4.20	tas3	elp3	-	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.120474199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788299	2540735	2540687	277258	277212	SPBC83.03c	SPBC21D10.08c	tas3	SPBC21D10.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87762932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788300	2540735	2538690	277258	275275	SPBC83.03c	SPCC1393.05	tas3	ers1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.595183388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788301	2540735	2539113	277258	275685	SPBC83.03c	SPCC1919.11	tas3	mug137	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642646174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788302	2540735	2539993	277258	276537	SPBC83.03c	SPBC1105.05	tas3	exg1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.415023933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788303	2540735	2541337	277258	277848	SPBC83.03c	SPBP35G2.13c	tas3	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.810448763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788304	2540735	2543254	277258	279682	SPBC83.03c	SPAC1006.03c	tas3	red1	-	iss3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.697527429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788305	2540735	2543515	277258	279933	SPBC83.03c	SPAC4F10.14c	tas3	btf3	-	btt1|egd1|nac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.772718003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788306	2540735	2540930	277258	277446	SPBC83.03c	SPBC354.10	tas3	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.619295316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788307	2540735	2538848	277258	275429	SPBC83.03c	SPCC613.12c	tas3	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.797618728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788308	2540735	2542869	277258	279314	SPBC83.03c	SPAC140.02	tas3	gar2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.22578794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788309	2540735	2541762	277258	278256	SPBC83.03c	SPAC139.01c	tas3	SPAC139.01c	-	SPAC955.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.465165845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788310	2540735	2543493	277258	279913	SPBC83.03c	SPAC4G8.08	tas3	SPAC4G8.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935047809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788311	2540735	2543213	277258	279642	SPBC83.03c	SPAC12B10.16c	tas3	mug157	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.25389914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788312	2540735	2539908	277258	276454	SPBC83.03c	SPBC13E7.06	tas3	msd1	-	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.483730525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788313	2540735	2539763	277258	276314	SPBC83.03c	SPBC1861.05	tas3	SPBC1861.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.869054368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788314	2540735	2542806	277258	279254	SPBC83.03c	SPAC1610.01	tas3	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.700009581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788315	2540735	2540959	277258	277475	SPBC83.03c	SPBC365.12c	tas3	ish1	-	isp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153947133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788316	2540735	2542198	277258	278673	SPBC83.03c	SPAC6F12.09	tas3	rdp1	-	rdr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.592505198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788317	2540735	2539160	277258	275732	SPBC83.03c	SPCC18.17c	tas3	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.806775487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788318	2540735	2541786	277258	278278	SPBC83.03c	SPAC22F3.08c	tas3	rok1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.943360514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788319	2540735	2542407	277258	278871	SPBC83.03c	SPAC19B12.06c	tas3	SPAC19B12.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149657177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788320	2540735	2542516	277258	278974	SPBC83.03c	SPAC2F7.04	tas3	pmc2	-	med1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.103148135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788321	2540735	2539082	277258	275654	SPBC83.03c	SPCC126.03	tas3	pus1	-	lps1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454917624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788322	2540735	2543619	277258	280033	SPBC83.03c	SPAC4F10.04	tas3	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.918136087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788323	2540735	2540619	277258	277145	SPBC83.03c	SPBC25H2.15	tas3	SPBC25H2.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.812122028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788324	2540735	2540242	277258	276774	SPBC83.03c	SPBC32F12.07c	tas3	SPBC32F12.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.968073877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788325	2540735	2543670	277258	280084	SPBC83.03c	SPAPB1E7.06c	tas3	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.145325065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788326	2540735	2541973	277258	278458	SPBC83.03c	SPAC6G9.13c	tas3	bqt1	-	mug23|rec26	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.334323415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788327	2540735	2539600	277258	276158	SPBC83.03c	SPCP1E11.03	tas3	mug170	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515421173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788328	2540735	2540648	277258	277173	SPBC83.03c	SPBC1921.05	tas3	ape2	-	ape1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.92546646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788329	2540735	2542541	277258	278998	SPBC83.03c	SPAC1B3.03c	tas3	wis2	-	cyp5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.878054275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788330	2540735	2538717	277258	275301	SPBC83.03c	SPCC1235.02	tas3	bio2	-	SPCC320.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331509642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788331	2540735	2540531	277258	277059	SPBC83.03c	SPBC23E6.08	tas3	sat1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.441285458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788332	2540735	2541358	277258	277869	SPBC83.03c	SPBP4H10.16c	tas3	SPBP4H10.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.514265468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788333	2540735	2540115	277258	276652	SPBC83.03c	SPBC1778.02	tas3	rap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.064745648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788334	2540735	2539471	277258	276034	SPBC83.03c	SPCC576.14	tas3	dph5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.126403964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788335	2540735	2541470	277258	277972	SPBC83.03c	SPAPYUG7.04c	tas3	rpb9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.772338893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788336	2540735	2542418	277258	278881	SPBC83.03c	SPAC1805.07c	tas3	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.079982327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788337	2540735	2541638	277258	278134	SPBC83.03c	SPAC2F7.06c	tas3	pol4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098497967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788338	2540735	2541229	277258	277743	SPBC83.03c	SPBC839.05c	tas3	rps1701	-	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578726077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788339	2540735	2543377	277258	279799	SPBC83.03c	SPAC3H1.07	tas3	aru1	-	car3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.926878279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788340	2540735	2541535	277258	278035	SPBC83.03c	SPAC12G12.10	tas3	wdr21	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926088141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788341	2540735	2543091	277258	279524	SPBC83.03c	SPAC12G12.15	tas3	sif3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04295071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788342	2540735	2542685	277258	279138	SPBC83.03c	SPAC26A3.06	tas3	bud23	-	SPAC26A3.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323490317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788343	2540735	2542826	277258	279273	SPBC83.03c	SPAC13G6.09	tas3	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.37898749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788344	2540735	2542840	277258	279286	SPBC83.03c	SPAC13G6.08	tas3	SPAC13G6.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.124200947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788345	2540735	2542133	277258	278609	SPBC83.03c	SPAC1687.19c	tas3	qtr1	-	SPAC1687.19c|qtrt1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.029513421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788346	2540735	2542693	277258	279146	SPBC83.03c	SPAC27D7.09c	tas3	SPAC27D7.09c	-	SPAC27D7.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988750366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788347	2540735	2543109	277258	279541	SPBC83.03c	SPAC3G6.09c	tas3	tps2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045615821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788348	2540735	2542341	277258	278807	SPBC83.03c	SPAC16E8.17c	tas3	SPAC16E8.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.378990052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788349	2540735	2543633	277258	280047	SPBC83.03c	SPAC3H8.05c	tas3	mms1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197413289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788350	2540735	2540936	277258	277452	SPBC83.03c	SPBC800.05c	tas3	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51194642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788351	2540735	2541757	277258	278251	SPBC83.03c	SPAC2F7.10	tas3	akr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913081002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788352	2540735	2539702	277258	276255	SPBC83.03c	SPBC1604.12	tas3	SPBC1604.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.80964842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788353	2540735	2542442	277258	278904	SPBC83.03c	SPACUNK12.02c	tas3	cmk1	-	CaMK-I|SPAC25D11.02C	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.54806101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788354	2540735	2540140	277258	276677	SPBC83.03c	SPBC16C6.08c	tas3	qcr6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.190821704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788355	2540735	5802702	277258	857840	SPBC83.03c	SPCC1235.15	tas3	dga1	-	SPCC548.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866194076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788356	2540735	2539375	277258	275941	SPBC83.03c	SPCC4G3.11	tas3	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.566594145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788357	2540735	2539189	277258	275760	SPBC83.03c	SPCC1682.16	tas3	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989496042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788358	2540735	2543337	277258	279760	SPBC83.03c	SPAC959.08	tas3	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.947800942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788359	2540735	2541645	277258	278141	SPBC83.03c	SPAC1527.03	tas3	SPAC1527.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143002869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788360	2540735	2539700	277258	276253	SPBC83.03c	SPBC1685.15c	tas3	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.661128509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788361	2540735	2541675	277258	278171	SPBC83.03c	SPAC22F8.12c	tas3	shf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.623850856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788362	2540735	2543387	277258	279809	SPBC83.03c	SPAPB1E7.02c	tas3	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.710735877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788363	2540735	2541466	277258	277968	SPBC83.03c	SPAC14C4.06c	tas3	nab2	-	SPAC14C4.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783707152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788364	2540735	2539583	277258	276142	SPBC83.03c	SPCC777.04	tas3	SPCC777.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509141607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788365	2540735	2542424	277258	278886	SPBC83.03c	SPAC1805.14	tas3	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.569274993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788366	2540735	2540486	277258	277014	SPBC83.03c	SPBC21D10.07	tas3	cmc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09413177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788367	2540735	2539085	277258	275657	SPBC83.03c	SPCC285.15c	tas3	rps2802	-	rps28|rps28-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.054852434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788368	2540735	2543372	277258	279794	SPBC83.03c	SPAPB1A10.09	tas3	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.3163222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788369	2540735	2541431	277258	277936	SPBC83.03c	SPAC1F3.08c	tas3	SPAC1F3.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986330126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788370	2540735	2542656	277258	279110	SPBC83.03c	SPAC2E1P3.05c	tas3	SPAC2E1P3.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.121194481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788371	2540735	2543100	277258	279532	SPBC83.03c	SPAC12B10.14c	tas3	tea5	-	ppk2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099892172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788372	2540735	3361295	277258	280371	SPBC83.03c	SPBC1921.01c	tas3	rpl35b	-	rpl37|rpl37-1|rpl3701|SPBC29C10.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87357197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788373	2540735	2542094	277258	278571	SPBC83.03c	SPAC29B12.06c	tas3	rcd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327647982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788374	2540735	2543501	277258	279919	SPBC83.03c	SPAC664.14	tas3	amt2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.260146575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788375	2540735	2538940	277258	275515	SPBC83.03c	SPCC1620.07c	tas3	lnp1	-	SPCC1620.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.986205787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788376	2540735	2540811	277258	277330	SPBC83.03c	SPBC19C7.05	tas3	SPBC19C7.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143849326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788377	2540735	2540843	277258	277360	SPBC83.03c	SPBC557.05	tas3	SPBC557.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.14971313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788378	2540260	2540279	276791	276810	SPBC577.03c	SPBC3B8.04c	SPBC577.03c	SPBC3B8.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.923068498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788379	2540260	2543529	276791	279947	SPBC577.03c	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC577.03c	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.067909594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788380	2540260	2539443	276791	276006	SPBC577.03c	SPCC736.02	SPBC577.03c	SPCC736.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508354713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788381	2540260	2542689	276791	279142	SPBC577.03c	SPAC29B12.04	SPBC577.03c	snz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923840361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788382	2540260	2543641	276791	280055	SPBC577.03c	SPAC3H5.08c	SPBC577.03c	SPAC3H5.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.535540019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788383	2540260	2542036	276791	278518	SPBC577.03c	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC577.03c	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378044452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788384	2540260	2538821	276791	275402	SPBC577.03c	SPCC584.01c	SPBC577.03c	SPCC584.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.923863063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788385	2540260	2538789	276791	275370	SPBC577.03c	SPCC338.04	SPBC577.03c	cid2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.84079294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788386	2540260	2542902	276791	279346	SPBC577.03c	SPAC144.05	SPBC577.03c	SPAC144.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319762919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788387	2540260	2539667	276791	276222	SPBC577.03c	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC577.03c	ash2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930816226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788388	2540260	2541961	276791	278448	SPBC577.03c	SPAC23C4.02	SPBC577.03c	crn1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808580298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788389	2540260	2542597	276791	279051	SPBC577.03c	SPAP8A3.07c	SPBC577.03c	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.618533427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788390	2540260	2542838	276791	279284	SPBC577.03c	SPAC13G7.11	SPBC577.03c	SPAC13G7.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.459763211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788391	2540260	2539253	276791	275823	SPBC577.03c	SPCC1827.03c	SPBC577.03c	SPCC1827.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.50975248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788392	2540260	2543646	276791	280060	SPBC577.03c	SPAC821.07c	SPBC577.03c	moc3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924815079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788393	2541065	2543529	277580	279947	SPBC3B9.15c	SPAC4C5.02c	scp1	ryh1	scap	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.317297571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788394	2541065	2542585	277580	279040	SPBC3B9.15c	SPAC31A2.13c	scp1	sft1	scap	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.839448342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788395	2541065	2540161	277580	276696	SPBC3B9.15c	SPBC13E7.03c	scp1	SPBC13E7.03c	scap	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.14846857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788396	2541065	2541038	277580	277553	SPBC3B9.15c	SPBC29A10.01	scp1	ccr1	scap	SPBC365.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.049896698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788397	2540117	2542585	276654	279040	SPBC1289.12	SPAC31A2.13c	usp109	sft1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.679212814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788398	2540117	3361561	276654	280637	SPBC1289.12	SPAC11E3.01c	usp109	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.817257152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788399	2540117	2539564	276654	276125	SPBC1289.12	SPCC550.12	usp109	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.811539011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788400	2540117	2543426	276654	279846	SPBC1289.12	SPAC631.02	usp109	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.318834017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788401	2540117	2541710	276654	278205	SPBC1289.12	SPAC343.11c	usp109	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.977261427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788402	2540117	2543443	276654	279863	SPBC1289.12	SPAC3H1.12c	usp109	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.806182217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788403	2540117	2541266	276654	277780	SPBC1289.12	SPBP16F5.05c	usp109	yar1	-	SPBP16F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.989073834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788404	2540117	2541337	276654	277848	SPBC1289.12	SPBP35G2.13c	usp109	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.121087364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788405	2540117	2539668	276654	276223	SPBC1289.12	SPBC11B10.10c	usp109	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.379676773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788406	2540117	2542943	276654	279384	SPBC1289.12	SPBC1348.03	usp109	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.702429239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788407	2543226	2543529	279654	279947	SPAC6B12.05c	SPAC4C5.02c	ies2	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.714858814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788408	2543226	2543064	279654	279497	SPAC6B12.05c	SPAC3G6.01	ies2	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.254238781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788409	2543226	2540068	279654	276606	SPAC6B12.05c	SPBC1734.12c	ies2	alg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.911067326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788410	2543226	2542502	279654	278960	SPAC6B12.05c	SPAC139.06	ies2	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.378530163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788411	2543226	2540686	279654	277211	SPAC6B12.05c	SPBC21D10.10	ies2	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508517959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788412	2543226	2543320	279654	279744	SPAC6B12.05c	SPAPJ695.01c	ies2	SPAPJ695.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706661639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788413	2543226	2539226	279654	275796	SPAC6B12.05c	SPCC16C4.20c	ies2	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.814412421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788414	2543226	2542468	279654	278929	SPAC6B12.05c	SPAC1D4.09c	ies2	rtf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.78084863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788415	2543226	2539564	279654	276125	SPAC6B12.05c	SPCC550.12	ies2	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63956011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788416	2543226	2540425	279654	276953	SPAC6B12.05c	SPBC27.06c	ies2	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.022607919	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788417	2543226	2542318	279654	278784	SPAC6B12.05c	SPAC16C9.05	ies2	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.622160027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788418	2543226	2542969	279654	279409	SPAC6B12.05c	SPAC4G8.10	ies2	gos1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.0656287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788419	2543226	2542277	279654	278746	SPAC6B12.05c	SPAC17A5.02c	ies2	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.060562517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788420	2543226	2540595	279654	277121	SPAC6B12.05c	SPBC21C3.02c	ies2	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.808586519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788421	2543226	2543563	279654	279979	SPAC6B12.05c	SPAC664.02c	ies2	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.20553898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788422	2543226	2539381	279654	275947	SPAC6B12.05c	SPCC1739.10	ies2	mug33	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.870446656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788423	2543226	2538906	279654	275483	SPAC6B12.05c	SPCC1259.03	ies2	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.000984568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788424	2543226	2542791	279654	279240	SPAC6B12.05c	SPAC167.04	ies2	pam17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510670741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788425	2543226	2541379	279654	277890	SPAC6B12.05c	SPBP8B7.27	ies2	mug30	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.560747034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788426	2543226	2538770	279654	275353	SPAC6B12.05c	SPCC1753.02c	ies2	git3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036537892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788427	2543226	2543406	279654	279828	SPAC6B12.05c	SPAC9.12c	ies2	atp12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.718681054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788428	2543226	2540200	279654	276733	SPAC6B12.05c	SPBC1709.06	ies2	dus2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.461703369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788429	2543226	2540599	279654	277125	SPAC6B12.05c	SPBC29A3.10c	ies2	atp14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.185786357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788430	2543226	2540882	279654	277399	SPAC6B12.05c	SPBC4F6.08c	ies2	mrpl39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.822199445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788431	2543226	2543331	279654	279754	SPAC6B12.05c	SPAC56E4.07	ies2	SPAC56E4.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984358991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788432	2543226	2539527	279654	276089	SPAC6B12.05c	SPCC338.16	ies2	pof3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984840046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788433	2543226	2540498	279654	277026	SPAC6B12.05c	SPBC27.02c	ies2	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.810966648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788434	2543226	2540800	279654	277319	SPAC6B12.05c	SPBC409.20c	ies2	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386443452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788435	2543226	2539729	279654	276281	SPAC6B12.05c	SPBC11B10.07c	ies2	ivn1	-	pi004|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852814321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788436	2543226	5802702	279654	857840	SPAC6B12.05c	SPCC1235.15	ies2	dga1	-	SPCC548.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874413939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788437	2543226	2543486	279654	279906	SPAC6B12.05c	SPAC959.07	ies2	rps403	-	rps4|rps4-3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988185451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788438	2543226	2543220	279654	279648	SPAC6B12.05c	SPAPB21F2.02	ies2	SPAPB21F2.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819811319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788439	2543226	2541675	279654	278171	SPAC6B12.05c	SPAC22F8.12c	ies2	shf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.936678499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788440	2543226	2541806	279654	278297	SPAC6B12.05c	SPAC4G8.13c	ies2	prz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195675536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788441	2543226	2541478	279654	277980	SPAC6B12.05c	SPAC2F7.17	ies2	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193994415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788442	2543226	2539731	279654	276283	SPAC6B12.05c	SPBC1271.09	ies2	SPBC1271.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81887754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788443	2543226	2540309	279654	276839	SPAC6B12.05c	SPBC21B10.13c	ies2	yox1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.206675779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788444	2543226	2543472	279654	279892	SPAC6B12.05c	SPAC959.04c	ies2	omh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258734424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788445	2543226	2541260	279654	277774	SPAC6B12.05c	SPBC902.05c	ies2	idh2	-	glu2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813042987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788446	2539984	2539050	276528	275623	SPBC1289.11	SPCC11E10.08	spf38	rik1	cwf17	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.576806561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788447	2539984	2541552	276528	278051	SPBC1289.11	SPAC1142.08	spf38	fhl1	cwf17	SPAC8C9.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.475058084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788448	2539984	2543432	276528	279852	SPBC1289.11	SPAC4G8.05	spf38	ppk14	cwf17	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.43701813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788449	2539984	2539420	276528	275985	SPBC1289.11	SPCC970.07c	spf38	raf2	cwf17	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.097397306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788450	2539984	2542555	276528	279012	SPBC1289.11	SPAC1952.06c	spf38	SPAC1952.06c	cwf17	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.826066303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788451	2539984	2540929	276528	277445	SPBC1289.11	SPBC354.03	spf38	swd3	cwf17	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326965365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788452	2539984	2540825	276528	277343	SPBC1289.11	SPBC428.08c	spf38	clr4	cwf17	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.143173869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788453	2539984	2542499	276528	278958	SPBC1289.11	SPAC1F12.04c	spf38	SPAC1F12.04c	cwf17	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507480453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788454	2539984	2540647	276528	277172	SPBC1289.11	SPBC18H10.07	spf38	SPBC18H10.07	cwf17	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5730015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788455	2539984	2541911	276528	278401	SPBC1289.11	SPAC212.04c	spf38	SPAC212.04c	cwf17	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.407745109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788456	2539984	2542710	276528	279163	SPBC1289.11	SPAC750.08c	spf38	SPAC750.08c	cwf17	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.491593773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788457	2539984	2539213	276528	275783	SPBC1289.11	SPCC285.10c	spf38	SPCC285.10c	cwf17	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.15508492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788458	2539984	2538848	276528	275429	SPBC1289.11	SPCC613.12c	spf38	raf1	cwf17	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.540523764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788459	2539984	2543628	276528	280042	SPBC1289.11	SPAC3H8.10	spf38	spo20	cwf17	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517372828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788460	2539984	2539925	276528	276469	SPBC1289.11	SPBC16H5.13	spf38	SPBC16H5.13	cwf17	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.936019598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788461	2539984	2542222	276528	278695	SPBC1289.11	SPAC31G5.18c	spf38	sde2	cwf17	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516847349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788462	2539984	2542943	276528	279384	SPBC1289.11	SPBC1348.03	spf38	SPBC1348.03	cwf17	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.198045551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788463	2539984	2540734	276528	277257	SPBC1289.11	SPBC19G7.09	spf38	ulp1	cwf17	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32436234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788464	2539481	2538939	276044	275514	SPCC622.16c	SPCC1672.04c	epe1	SPCC1672.04c	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32374429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788465	2539481	2542207	276044	278682	SPCC622.16c	SPAC17H9.10c	epe1	ddb1	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.298138813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788466	2539481	2541475	276044	277977	SPCC622.16c	SPAC24B11.09	epe1	mpc2	kdm2	SPAC24B11.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517681618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788467	2539481	2541257	276044	277771	SPCC622.16c	SPBP23A10.14c	epe1	ell1	kdm2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.050912587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788468	2539481	2540060	276044	276598	SPCC622.16c	SPBC106.01	epe1	mph1	kdm2	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.355346104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788469	2539481	2541656	276044	278152	SPCC622.16c	SPAC25H1.06	epe1	pcf3	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.82648292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788470	2539481	2540913	276044	277429	SPCC622.16c	SPBC56F2.08c	epe1	SPBC56F2.08c	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.606330715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788471	2539481	2540863	276044	277380	SPCC622.16c	SPBC56F2.03	epe1	SPBC56F2.03	kdm2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.049399184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788472	2539481	2542953	276044	279393	SPCC622.16c	SPAC1006.06	epe1	rgf2	kdm2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932594193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788473	2539481	2541104	276044	277619	SPCC622.16c	SPBC6B1.03c	epe1	SPBC6B1.03c	kdm2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.256263187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788474	2539481	2542009	276044	278492	SPCC622.16c	SPAC212.08c	epe1	SPAC212.08c	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.625329295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788475	2539481	2543201	276044	279630	SPCC622.16c	SPAC3F10.15c	epe1	spo12	kdm2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808156774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788476	2539481	5802967	276044	858105	SPCC622.16c	SPAC20G4.08	epe1	pdc1	kdm2	SPAC20G4.08|SPAC4F10.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.762686555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788477	2539481	2541633	276044	278129	SPCC622.16c	SPAC664.01c	epe1	swi6	kdm2	SPAC824.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.814726853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788478	2539481	2542917	276044	279358	SPCC622.16c	SPAC9E9.11	epe1	plr1	kdm2	plr	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.343771674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788479	2539481	2542071	276044	278548	SPCC622.16c	SPAC26H5.03	epe1	pcf2	kdm2	cac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.282546838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788480	2539481	2538710	276044	275294	SPCC622.16c	SPCC1020.12c	epe1	xap5	kdm2	SPCC14G10.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.533134151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788481	2539481	2540999	276044	277515	SPCC622.16c	SPBC4B4.04	epe1	SPBC4B4.04	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.975922319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788482	2539481	2539226	276044	275796	SPCC622.16c	SPCC16C4.20c	epe1	SPCC16C4.20c	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.316816167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788483	2539481	2539420	276044	275985	SPCC622.16c	SPCC970.07c	epe1	raf2	kdm2	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.266659563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788484	2539481	2541208	276044	277722	SPCC622.16c	SPBC887.04c	epe1	lub1	kdm2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.975405877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788485	2539481	2543043	276044	279478	SPCC622.16c	SPAC3F10.13	epe1	ucp6	kdm2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.416907043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788486	2539481	2539797	276044	276347	SPCC622.16c	SPBC16G5.14c	epe1	rps3	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.192936006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788487	2539481	2540929	276044	277445	SPCC622.16c	SPBC354.03	epe1	swd3	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.176788737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788488	2539481	2542022	276044	278505	SPCC622.16c	SPAC23A1.03	epe1	apt1	kdm2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.408617902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788489	2539481	2542318	276044	278784	SPCC622.16c	SPAC16C9.05	epe1	cph1	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.808269052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788490	2539481	2538823	276044	275404	SPCC622.16c	SPCC18B5.02c	epe1	SPCC18B5.02c	kdm2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038644188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788491	2539481	2539175	276044	275746	SPCC622.16c	SPCC16C4.01	epe1	sif2	kdm2	SPCC5E4.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041109075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788492	2539481	2541311	276044	277823	SPCC622.16c	SPBP8B7.09c	epe1	los1	kdm2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.050570434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788493	2539481	2543641	276044	280055	SPCC622.16c	SPAC3H5.08c	epe1	SPAC3H5.08c	kdm2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047691808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788494	2539481	2543584	276044	279999	SPCC622.16c	SPAPB1E7.11c	epe1	SPAPB1E7.11c	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510478836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788495	2539481	2542213	276044	278687	SPCC622.16c	SPAC3G6.13c	epe1	rpl4101	kdm2	rpl41-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867256618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788496	2539481	2540825	276044	277343	SPCC622.16c	SPBC428.08c	epe1	clr4	kdm2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.153321943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788497	2539481	2542665	276044	279118	SPCC622.16c	SPAC10F6.08c	epe1	nht10	kdm2	nht1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.052097925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788498	2539481	2542950	276044	279390	SPCC622.16c	SPAC12B10.03	epe1	bun62	kdm2	wdr20	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819439312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788499	2539481	2543020	276044	279456	SPCC622.16c	SPAC10F6.13c	epe1	SPAC10F6.13c	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.513649799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788500	2539481	2541237	276044	277751	SPCC622.16c	SPBC947.04	epe1	pfl3	kdm2	SPBC947.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991579557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788501	2539481	2541776	276044	278270	SPCC622.16c	SPAC23H3.05c	epe1	swd1	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.166865119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788502	2539481	2542776	276044	279225	SPCC622.16c	SPAC167.01	epe1	ire1	kdm2	ppk4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.516854744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788503	2539481	2540338	276044	276867	SPCC622.16c	SPBC2G2.13c	epe1	dcd1	kdm2	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.400176872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788504	2539481	2540546	276044	277073	SPCC622.16c	SPBC25B2.06c	epe1	btb2	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.526377174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788505	2539481	2542507	276044	278965	SPCC622.16c	SPAC18G6.13	epe1	SPAC18G6.13	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.83998618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788506	2539481	2541543	276044	278043	SPCC622.16c	SPAC5H10.04	epe1	SPAC5H10.04	kdm2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.861561597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788507	2539481	2540352	276044	276881	SPCC622.16c	SPBC215.03c	epe1	csn1	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.139409194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788508	2539481	2540396	276044	276924	SPCC622.16c	SPBC31F10.12	epe1	tma20	kdm2	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258750102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788509	2539481	2540673	276044	277198	SPCC622.16c	SPBC1D7.03	epe1	mug80	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.988556982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788510	2539481	2542983	276044	279421	SPCC622.16c	SPAC11D3.15	epe1	SPAC11D3.15	kdm2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.467018118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788511	2539481	2542420	276044	278883	SPCC622.16c	SPAC19D5.03	epe1	cid1	kdm2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.977418095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788512	2539481	2539898	276044	276444	SPCC622.16c	SPBC12D12.07c	epe1	trx2	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32898905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788513	2539481	2543208	276044	279637	SPCC622.16c	SPAC328.04	epe1	SPAC328.04	kdm2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807533105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788514	2539481	2541943	276044	278430	SPCC622.16c	SPAC222.07c	epe1	hri2	kdm2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.00135006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788515	2539481	2541496	276044	277998	SPCC622.16c	SPAC23D3.09	epe1	arp42	kdm2	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.429429827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788516	2539481	2543313	276044	279737	SPCC622.16c	SPAPJ691.03	epe1	SPAPJ691.03	kdm2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143283802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788517	2539481	2541166	276044	277681	SPCC622.16c	SPBC725.15	epe1	ura5	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516879685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788518	2539481	2542357	276044	278822	SPCC622.16c	SPAC1782.07	epe1	qcr8	kdm2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930747974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788519	2539481	2538890	276044	275468	SPCC622.16c	SPCC1393.02c	epe1	spt2	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.55929613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788520	2539481	2540086	276044	276624	SPCC622.16c	SPBC16H5.12c	epe1	SPBC16H5.12c	kdm2	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.104613823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788521	2539481	2538769	276044	275352	SPCC622.16c	SPCC126.04c	epe1	sgf73	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.99464585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788522	2539481	2539667	276044	276222	SPCC622.16c	SPBC13G1.08c	epe1	ash2	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.70211065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788523	2539481	2542528	276044	278986	SPCC622.16c	SPAC1B3.08	epe1	SPAC1B3.08	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699755026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788524	2539481	2542874	276044	279319	SPCC622.16c	SPAC20H4.09	epe1	SPAC20H4.09	kdm2	SPAC145.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380106601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788525	2539481	2540961	276044	277477	SPCC622.16c	SPBC36B7.03	epe1	sec63	kdm2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.975924406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788526	2539481	2540077	276044	276615	SPCC622.16c	SPBC17D11.04c	epe1	nto1	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.061382543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788527	2539481	2540232	276044	276764	SPCC622.16c	SPBC336.10c	epe1	tif512	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.456345485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788528	2539481	2538767	276044	275350	SPCC622.16c	SPCC1672.12c	epe1	get4	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.314754812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788529	2539481	5802861	276044	857999	SPCC622.16c	SPAC1D4.01	epe1	tls1	kdm2	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.976469492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788530	2539481	2540378	276044	276907	SPCC622.16c	SPBC30D10.18c	epe1	rpl102	kdm2	rpl1-2|rpl10a-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868867975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788531	2539481	2541708	276044	278203	SPCC622.16c	SPAC31A2.02	epe1	trm112	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.20195043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788532	2539481	2541464	276044	277966	SPCC622.16c	SPAC222.08c	epe1	SPAC222.08c	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.587246951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788533	2539481	2539847	276044	276395	SPCC622.16c	SPBC530.14c	epe1	dsk1	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.735317301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788534	2539481	2540599	276044	277125	SPCC622.16c	SPBC29A3.10c	epe1	atp14	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.329055163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788535	2539481	2540844	276044	277361	SPCC622.16c	SPBC1921.04c	epe1	SPBC1921.04c	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.650477526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788536	2539481	2541742	276044	278236	SPCC622.16c	SPAC22H10.09	epe1	SPAC22H10.09	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844416697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788537	2539481	2538848	276044	275429	SPCC622.16c	SPCC613.12c	epe1	raf1	kdm2	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.368980252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788538	2539481	3361520	276044	280596	SPCC622.16c	SPAC1610.02c	epe1	SPAC1610.02c	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.49678735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788539	2539481	2540946	276044	277462	SPCC622.16c	SPBC36.04	epe1	cys11	kdm2	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711639874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788540	2539481	2540821	276044	277339	SPCC622.16c	SPBC800.03	epe1	clr3	kdm2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.081353475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788541	2539481	2542170	276044	278645	SPCC622.16c	SPAC17G8.13c	epe1	mst2	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.276585871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788542	2539481	2539706	276044	276259	SPCC622.16c	SPBC16G5.13	epe1	ptf2	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.169106839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788543	2539481	2542806	276044	279254	SPCC622.16c	SPAC1610.01	epe1	saf5	kdm2	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.618956638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788544	2539481	2542198	276044	278673	SPCC622.16c	SPAC6F12.09	epe1	rdp1	kdm2	rdr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.128926615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788545	2539481	2541156	276044	277671	SPCC622.16c	SPBC685.07c	epe1	rpl2701	kdm2	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.399729372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788546	2539481	2543619	276044	280033	SPCC622.16c	SPAC4F10.04	epe1	ypa1	kdm2	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.908656335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788547	2539481	2542327	276044	278793	SPCC622.16c	SPAC16C9.06c	epe1	upf1	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.422610015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788548	2539481	2543670	276044	280084	SPCC622.16c	SPAPB1E7.06c	epe1	eme1	kdm2	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709932612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788549	2539481	2543066	276044	279499	SPCC622.16c	SPAC343.12	epe1	rds1	kdm2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148010835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788550	2539481	2543662	276044	280076	SPCC622.16c	SPAC9.07c	epe1	SPAC9.07c	kdm2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.997090741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788551	2539481	2540115	276044	276652	SPCC622.16c	SPBC1778.02	epe1	rap1	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.169776315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788552	2539481	2541531	276044	278031	SPCC622.16c	SPAC25A8.01c	epe1	fft3	kdm2	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.569525286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788553	2539481	2540346	276044	276875	SPCC622.16c	SPBC2F12.03c	epe1	ebs1	kdm2	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.661848865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788554	2539481	2543439	276044	279859	SPCC622.16c	SPAPB1A10.13	epe1	SPAPB1A10.13	kdm2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143323417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788555	2539481	2541789	276044	278281	SPCC622.16c	SPAC23H4.08	epe1	iwr1	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.007896613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788556	2539481	2539920	276044	276464	SPCC622.16c	SPBC119.08	epe1	pmk1	kdm2	spm1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934520692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788557	2539481	2542244	276044	278714	SPCC622.16c	SPAC19G12.13c	epe1	poz1	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.57907269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788558	2539481	2541645	276044	278141	SPCC622.16c	SPAC1527.03	epe1	SPAC1527.03	kdm2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.80316291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788559	2539481	2542159	276044	278635	SPCC622.16c	SPAC1834.09	epe1	mug51	kdm2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.085640067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788560	2539481	2542561	276044	279017	SPCC622.16c	SPAC31G5.17c	epe1	rps1001	kdm2	rps10-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.316355377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788561	2539481	2538730	276044	275314	SPCC622.16c	SPCC31H12.02c	epe1	mug73	kdm2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.333945931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788562	2542123	2539050	278599	275623	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC11E10.08	mal3	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.52959938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788563	2542123	2543565	278599	279981	SPAC18G6.15	SPAPB24D3.04c	mal3	mag1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.357169714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788564	2542123	2540060	278599	276598	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC106.01	mal3	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.753237546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788565	2542123	2542435	278599	278897	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC1805.16c	mal3	SPAC1805.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.990587607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788566	2542123	2543064	278599	279497	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC3G6.01	mal3	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.092312241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788567	2542123	2542237	278599	278709	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC19E9.02	mal3	fin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.753922875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788568	2542123	2540161	278599	276696	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC13E7.03c	mal3	SPBC13E7.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.623510403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788569	2542123	2541633	278599	278129	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC664.01c	mal3	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.186148498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788570	2542123	2542103	278599	278579	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC31G5.11	mal3	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.118457158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788571	2542123	2539420	278599	275985	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC970.07c	mal3	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.729667203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788572	2542123	2540929	278599	277445	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC354.03	mal3	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319241396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788573	2542123	2542318	278599	278784	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC16C9.05	mal3	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708358365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788574	2542123	2538906	278599	275483	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC1259.03	mal3	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.725610069	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788575	2542123	2540825	278599	277343	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC428.08c	mal3	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.461401727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788576	2542123	2539960	278599	276504	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC15D4.15	mal3	pho2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.30833219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788577	2542123	2539467	278599	276030	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC417.07c	mal3	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.000590439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788578	2542123	2539733	278599	276285	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC16E9.12c	mal3	pab2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.815382139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788579	2542123	2541889	278599	278379	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC2F7.03c	mal3	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.479823209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788580	2542123	2539999	278599	276543	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC1734.15	mal3	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.670187218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788581	2542123	2539857	278599	276404	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC1604.20c	mal3	tea2	-	klp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.840416875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788582	2542123	2541009	278599	277524	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC428.04	mal3	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.264282042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788583	2542123	2538690	278599	275275	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC1393.05	mal3	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.928943139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788584	2542123	2541746	278599	278240	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC20G4.04c	mal3	hus1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932692999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788585	2542123	2538848	278599	275429	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC613.12c	mal3	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.707337385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788586	2542123	2540498	278599	277026	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC27.02c	mal3	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.431694934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788587	2542123	2542418	278599	278881	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC1805.07c	mal3	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.768985248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788588	2542123	2540936	278599	277452	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC800.05c	mal3	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932191871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788589	2542123	2539205	278599	275775	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC4B3.15	mal3	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.392860903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788590	2542123	2542021	278599	278504	SPAC18G6.15	SPAP14E8.02	mal3	tos4	-	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.381360482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788591	2542123	2542059	278599	278537	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC328.06	mal3	ubp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.375570138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788592	2542123	2542424	278599	278886	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC1805.14	mal3	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980900786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788593	2542123	2542440	278599	278902	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC17A2.12	mal3	rrp1	-	SPAC17A2.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.304868686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788594	2540221	2540279	276754	276810	SPBC32F12.02	SPBC3B8.04c	rec14	SPBC3B8.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.376741019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788595	2540221	2542577	276754	279033	SPBC32F12.02	SPAC19G12.15c	rec14	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440870462	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788596	2540221	2542143	276754	278619	SPBC32F12.02	SPAC17C9.07	rec14	alg8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.970720434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788597	2540221	2540913	276754	277429	SPBC32F12.02	SPBC56F2.08c	rec14	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.836862457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788598	2540221	2542831	276754	279278	SPBC32F12.02	SPAC20H4.08	rec14	whi2	-	SPAC20H4.08|SPAC145.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037885475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788599	2540221	2541130	276754	277645	SPBC32F12.02	SPBC776.11	rec14	rpl2801	-	rpl28-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.184724592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788600	2540221	2542614	276754	279068	SPBC32F12.02	SPAC1399.04c	rec14	SPAC1399.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.337271288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788601	2540221	2539890	276754	276436	SPBC32F12.02	SPBC16C6.03c	rec14	SPBC16C6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.568884712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788602	2540221	2538922	276754	275499	SPBC32F12.02	SPCC16C4.10	rec14	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387902554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788603	2540221	2538806	276754	275387	SPBC32F12.02	SPCC1840.09	rec14	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385695163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788604	2540221	2543681	276754	280095	SPBC32F12.02	SPAC9.02c	rec14	SPAC9.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.260080081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788605	2540221	2539434	276754	275997	SPBC32F12.02	SPCC757.09c	rec14	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.818456182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788606	2540221	2539331	276754	275897	SPBC32F12.02	SPCC24B10.09	rec14	rps1702	-	rps17|rps17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.646137347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788607	2540221	2541119	276754	277634	SPBC32F12.02	SPBC651.11c	rec14	apm3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928454813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788608	2540221	2539937	276754	276481	SPBC32F12.02	SPBC1539.08	rec14	arf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.396306377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788609	2540221	2539302	276754	275870	SPBC32F12.02	SPCC126.09	rec14	zip2	-	SPCC126.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326636701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788610	2540221	2542022	276754	278505	SPBC32F12.02	SPAC23A1.03	rec14	apt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.351165709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788611	2540221	2543108	276754	279540	SPBC32F12.02	SPAC3A12.13c	rec14	SPAC3A12.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.075963169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788612	2540221	2542331	276754	278797	SPBC32F12.02	SPAC1834.05	rec14	alg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.116882455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788613	2540221	2542268	276754	278737	SPBC32F12.02	SPAC17A5.07c	rec14	ulp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816106767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788614	2540221	2542394	276754	278858	SPBC32F12.02	SPAC31G5.12c	rec14	maf1	-	n150	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.912182798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788615	2540221	2541741	276754	278235	SPBC32F12.02	SPAC20G4.02c	rec14	fus1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.907129219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788616	2540221	2540673	276754	277198	SPBC32F12.02	SPBC1D7.03	rec14	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45420731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788617	2540221	2542420	276754	278883	SPBC32F12.02	SPAC19D5.03	rec14	cid1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.27789647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788618	2540221	2539898	276754	276444	SPBC32F12.02	SPBC12D12.07c	rec14	trx2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450840857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788619	2540221	2539371	276754	275937	SPBC32F12.02	SPCC18B5.06	rec14	dom34	-	SPCC18B5.06|erf1|sup45	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.876522303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788620	2540221	2541496	276754	277998	SPBC32F12.02	SPAC23D3.09	rec14	arp42	-	arp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.962757288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788621	2540221	2542860	276754	279306	SPBC32F12.02	SPAC8C9.09c	rec14	mug129	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32418486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788622	2540221	2540831	276754	277349	SPBC32F12.02	SPBC428.02c	rec14	eca39	-	SPBC582.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444931421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788623	2540221	2540665	276754	277190	SPBC32F12.02	SPBC83.02c	rec14	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441105012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788624	2540221	2540751	276754	277273	SPBC32F12.02	SPBC20F10.10	rec14	psl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38048399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788625	2540221	2538849	276754	275430	SPBC32F12.02	SPCC330.14c	rec14	rpl2402	-	rpl24-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45350888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788626	2540221	2541053	276754	277568	SPBC32F12.02	SPBC56F2.10c	rec14	alg5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.916635187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788627	2540221	2539711	276754	276264	SPBC32F12.02	SPBC1683.09c	rec14	frp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515871825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788628	2540221	2540229	276754	276761	SPBC32F12.02	SPBC31F10.15c	rec14	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701691505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788629	2540221	2543515	276754	279933	SPBC32F12.02	SPAC4F10.14c	rec14	btf3	-	btt1|egd1|nac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702436841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788630	2540221	2539160	276754	275732	SPBC32F12.02	SPCC18.17c	rec14	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.853628113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788631	2540221	2539925	276754	276469	SPBC32F12.02	SPBC16H5.13	rec14	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576032433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788632	2540221	2543066	276754	279499	SPBC32F12.02	SPAC343.12	rec14	rds1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036962875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788633	2540221	2539013	276754	275586	SPBC32F12.02	SPCC364.03	rec14	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.991217808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788634	2540221	2539188	276754	275759	SPBC32F12.02	SPCC1827.04	rec14	vms1	-	SPCC1827.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.972609717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788635	2540221	2539207	276754	275777	SPBC32F12.02	SPCC285.09c	rec14	cgs2	-	pde1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.623752893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788636	2540221	2541806	276754	278297	SPBC32F12.02	SPAC4G8.13c	rec14	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.970222536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788637	2540221	2540309	276754	276839	SPBC32F12.02	SPBC21B10.13c	rec14	yox1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642946102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788638	2540221	2543624	276754	280038	SPBC32F12.02	SPAC4D7.06c	rec14	SPAC4D7.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.497301453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788639	2540100	2538896	276638	275474	SPBC13E7.09	SPCC584.11c	vrp1	SPCC584.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.629872274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788640	2540100	2541345	276638	277856	SPBC13E7.09	SPBP35G2.07	vrp1	ilv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32198909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788641	2540100	2543320	276638	279744	SPBC13E7.09	SPAPJ695.01c	vrp1	SPAPJ695.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647467642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788642	2540100	2542107	276638	278583	SPBC13E7.09	SPAC30.01c	vrp1	sec72	-	sec7b|sec702	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990006715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788643	2540100	2541227	276638	277741	SPBC13E7.09	SPBC947.05c	vrp1	frp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987122725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788644	2540100	2540714	276638	277237	SPBC13E7.09	SPBC19C2.04c	vrp1	ubp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988473661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788645	2540100	2543426	276638	279846	SPBC13E7.09	SPAC631.02	vrp1	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.186461859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788646	2540100	2540415	276638	276943	SPBC13E7.09	SPBC30B4.06c	vrp1	SPBC30B4.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390145242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788647	2540100	2542239	276638	278711	SPBC13E7.09	SPAC18G6.02c	vrp1	chp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38391402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788648	2540100	2542260	276638	278729	SPBC13E7.09	SPAC1F12.05	vrp1	SPAC1F12.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.664524171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788649	2540100	2541250	276638	277764	SPBC13E7.09	SPBC8D2.17	vrp1	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.506209828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788650	2540100	2543144	276638	279576	SPBC13E7.09	SPAC3F10.05c	vrp1	mug113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387240957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788651	2540100	2541545	276638	278045	SPBC13E7.09	SPAC22F8.07c	vrp1	rtf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820349468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788652	2540100	2538770	276638	275353	SPBC13E7.09	SPCC1753.02c	vrp1	git3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.55890247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788653	2540100	2543412	276638	279834	SPBC13E7.09	SPAC637.07	vrp1	moe1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875224512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788654	2540100	2542971	276638	279410	SPBC13E7.09	SPAC105.02c	vrp1	SPAC105.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.087957869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788655	2540100	2541889	276638	278379	SPBC13E7.09	SPAC2F7.03c	vrp1	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.056479213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788656	2540100	2541496	276638	277998	SPBC13E7.09	SPAC23D3.09	vrp1	arp42	-	arp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.509197929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788657	2540100	2539603	276638	276161	SPBC13E7.09	SPBC1289.06c	vrp1	ppr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.617918211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788658	2540100	2539857	276638	276404	SPBC13E7.09	SPBC1604.20c	vrp1	tea2	-	klp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.381034118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788659	2540100	2542611	276638	279065	SPBC13E7.09	SPAC29A4.05	vrp1	cam2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.258575307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788660	2540100	2543244	276638	279672	SPBC13E7.09	SPAC6B12.06c	vrp1	rrg9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.333510777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788661	2540100	2538945	276638	275519	SPBC13E7.09	SPCC1739.06c	vrp1	SPCC1739.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097689586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788662	2540100	2539974	276638	276518	SPBC13E7.09	SPBC32H8.07	vrp1	git5	-	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989813227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788663	2540100	2541241	276638	277755	SPBC13E7.09	SPBC887.17	vrp1	SPBC887.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.43947626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788664	2540100	2539953	276638	276497	SPBC13E7.09	SPBC1709.11c	vrp1	png2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929092621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788665	2540100	2540335	276638	276865	SPBC13E7.09	SPBC30B4.03c	vrp1	adn1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932358357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788666	2540100	2540967	276638	277483	SPBC13E7.09	SPBC36B7.08c	vrp1	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388572239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788667	2540100	2542773	276638	279222	SPBC13E7.09	SPAC16.01	vrp1	rho2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.128391512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788668	2540100	2539059	276638	275632	SPBC13E7.09	SPCC737.06c	vrp1	SPCC737.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865731533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788669	2540100	3361105	276638	280181	SPBC13E7.09	SPCC188.10c	vrp1	SPCC188.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925798575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788670	2540100	3361520	276638	280596	SPBC13E7.09	SPAC1610.02c	vrp1	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.401894382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788671	2540100	2542869	276638	279314	SPBC13E7.09	SPAC140.02	vrp1	gar2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987845611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788672	2540100	2542992	276638	279430	SPBC13E7.09	SPAC1071.09c	vrp1	SPAC1071.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.722680607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788673	2540100	2541175	276638	277689	SPBC13E7.09	SPBC839.13c	vrp1	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.202948001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788674	2540100	2539030	276638	275603	SPBC13E7.09	SPCP1E11.02	vrp1	ppk38	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.316196074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788675	2540100	2538966	276638	275540	SPBC13E7.09	SPCC18.10	vrp1	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643133798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788676	2540100	2541372	276638	277883	SPBC13E7.09	SPBP8B7.28c	vrp1	stc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.346057714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788677	2540100	2540891	276638	277407	SPBC13E7.09	SPBC582.08	vrp1	SPBC582.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.414998749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788678	2540100	2542826	276638	279273	SPBC13E7.09	SPAC13G6.09	vrp1	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.508972819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788679	2540100	2540516	276638	277044	SPBC13E7.09	SPBC21C3.01c	vrp1	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256455421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788680	2540100	2541115	276638	277630	SPBC13E7.09	SPBC660.07	vrp1	ntp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.202195316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788681	2540100	2543633	276638	280047	SPBC13E7.09	SPAC3H8.05c	vrp1	mms1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.510142054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788682	2540100	2539205	276638	275775	SPBC13E7.09	SPCC4B3.15	vrp1	mid1	-	dmf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.713705512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788683	2540100	2543384	276638	279806	SPBC13E7.09	SPAC637.06	vrp1	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.328850285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788684	2540100	2541627	276638	278123	SPBC13E7.09	SPAC1F5.08c	vrp1	yam8	-	ehs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323152789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788685	2540100	2538854	276638	275435	SPBC13E7.09	SPCP1E11.05c	vrp1	are2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580496405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788686	2540100	2541491	276638	277993	SPBC13E7.09	SPAC2C4.16c	vrp1	rps801	-	rps8|rps8-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810078256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788687	2540100	2541272	276638	277786	SPBC13E7.09	SPBC947.03c	vrp1	naa38	-	mak31	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98741398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788688	2540100	2543624	276638	280038	SPBC13E7.09	SPAC4D7.06c	vrp1	SPAC4D7.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57569441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788689	2541337	2542207	277848	278682	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC17H9.10c	swc2	ddb1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.560133379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788690	2541337	2538796	277848	275377	SPBP35G2.13c	SPCC63.06	swc2	SPCC63.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147659604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788691	2541337	2542577	277848	279033	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC19G12.15c	swc2	tpp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985540806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788692	2541337	2540131	277848	276668	SPBP35G2.13c	SPBC1778.05c	swc2	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.228863762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788693	2541337	3361561	277848	280637	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC11E3.01c	swc2	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.557874489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788694	2541337	2539309	277848	275876	SPBP35G2.13c	SPCC4G3.19	swc2	alp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706447499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788695	2541337	2542613	277848	279067	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC18B11.03c	swc2	SPAC18B11.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092955265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788696	2541337	2541214	277848	277728	SPBP35G2.13c	SPBC839.07	swc2	ibp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392497541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788697	2541337	2538847	277848	275428	SPBP35G2.13c	SPCC594.06c	swc2	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978536721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788698	2541337	2539510	277848	276072	SPBP35G2.13c	SPCC4G3.04c	swc2	coq5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199382001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788699	2541337	2539564	277848	276125	SPBP35G2.13c	SPCC550.12	swc2	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.610721913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788700	2541337	2539937	277848	276481	SPBP35G2.13c	SPBC1539.08	swc2	arf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.518026318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788701	2541337	2540425	277848	276953	SPBP35G2.13c	SPBC27.06c	swc2	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.186182667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788702	2541337	2542318	277848	278784	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC16C9.05	swc2	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.94025751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788703	2541337	2542277	277848	278746	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC17A5.02c	swc2	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.980816114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788704	2541337	2540595	277848	277121	SPBP35G2.13c	SPBC21C3.02c	swc2	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.117255261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788705	2541337	2542220	277848	278694	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC1A6.03c	swc2	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.308381397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788706	2541337	2543563	277848	279979	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC664.02c	swc2	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.299292111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788707	2541337	2542981	277848	279419	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC824.02	swc2	bst1	-	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.070742299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788708	2541337	2542568	277848	279024	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC1952.02	swc2	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.894323291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788709	2541337	2539388	277848	275953	SPBP35G2.13c	SPCC24B10.12	swc2	cgi121	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.121933196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788710	2541337	2542311	277848	278777	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC16A10.05c	swc2	dad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.243525857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788711	2541337	2541776	277848	278270	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC23H3.05c	swc2	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714877274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788712	2541337	2539845	277848	276393	SPBP35G2.13c	SPBC12C2.02c	swc2	ste20	-	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.74305203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788713	2541337	2541496	277848	277998	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC23D3.09	swc2	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.740984566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788714	2541337	2543667	277848	280081	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC4H3.02c	swc2	swc3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.557302546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788715	2541337	2543643	277848	280057	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC3G9.07c	swc2	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.891716943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788716	2541337	2541899	277848	278389	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC22E12.11c	swc2	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.134293252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788717	2541337	2541710	277848	278205	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC343.11c	swc2	msc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.314543266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788718	2541337	2543396	277848	279818	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC4D7.11	swc2	dsc4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.029507704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788719	2541337	2538769	277848	275352	SPBP35G2.13c	SPCC126.04c	swc2	sgf73	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872779045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788720	2541337	2539667	277848	276222	SPBP35G2.13c	SPBC13G1.08c	swc2	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.922923686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788721	2541337	2540997	277848	277513	SPBP35G2.13c	SPBC3H7.06c	swc2	pof9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.9893733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788722	2541337	2541828	277848	278319	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC22H12.05c	swc2	fsc1	-	SPAC22H12.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390685995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788723	2541337	2539224	277848	275794	SPBP35G2.13c	SPCC16A11.01	swc2	SPCC16A11.01	-	SPCC63.15	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980557292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788724	2541337	2541900	277848	278390	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC23H4.17c	swc2	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.349803779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788725	2541337	2539408	277848	275973	SPBP35G2.13c	SPCC576.12c	swc2	mhf2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.072135228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788726	2541337	2543443	277848	279863	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC3H1.12c	swc2	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.76532205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788727	2541337	2539317	277848	275883	SPBP35G2.13c	SPCC16A11.08	swc2	atg20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.270292751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788728	2541337	2541536	277848	278036	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC1071.02	swc2	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.203483348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788729	2541337	2541053	277848	277568	SPBP35G2.13c	SPBC56F2.10c	swc2	alg5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041609725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788730	2541337	2540967	277848	277483	SPBP35G2.13c	SPBC36B7.08c	swc2	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.413339329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788731	2541337	2538884	277848	275462	SPBP35G2.13c	SPCC1393.08	swc2	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.70785409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788732	2541337	2539527	277848	276089	SPBP35G2.13c	SPCC338.16	swc2	pof3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326443952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788733	2541337	2539519	277848	276081	SPBP35G2.13c	SPCC364.05	swc2	vps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.626165755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788734	2541337	2541628	277848	278124	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC110.02	swc2	pds5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193543314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788735	2541337	2541713	277848	278208	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC3A12.12	swc2	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.713851988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788736	2541337	2542806	277848	279254	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC1610.01	swc2	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.977371936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788737	2541337	2539842	277848	276390	SPBP35G2.13c	SPBC14C8.15	swc2	SPBC14C8.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.186822801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788738	2541337	2538762	277848	275345	SPBP35G2.13c	SPCC306.04c	swc2	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.441736426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788739	2541337	2540498	277848	277026	SPBP35G2.13c	SPBC27.02c	swc2	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387394187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788740	2541337	2541121	277848	277636	SPBP35G2.13c	SPBC609.03	swc2	iqw1	-	iqwd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.090139729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788741	2541337	2540464	277848	276992	SPBP35G2.13c	SPBC23E6.02	swc2	rrp2	-	SPBC23E6.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444773298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788742	2541337	2541531	277848	278031	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC25A8.01c	swc2	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.031301814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788743	2541337	2542418	277848	278881	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC1805.07c	swc2	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.916041964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788744	2541337	2539668	277848	276223	SPBP35G2.13c	SPBC11B10.10c	swc2	pht1	-	pi001	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.611163909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788745	2541337	2542416	277848	278880	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC589.03c	swc2	SPAC589.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.271232169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788746	2541337	2542250	277848	278720	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC17D4.03c	swc2	cis4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328574989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788747	2541337	2539205	277848	275775	SPBP35G2.13c	SPCC4B3.15	swc2	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.377105771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788748	2541337	2543384	277848	279806	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC637.06	swc2	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.340580863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788749	2541337	2543387	277848	279809	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAPB1E7.02c	swc2	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.523315196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788750	2541337	2542886	277848	279331	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC1486.01	swc2	SPAC1486.01	-	sod2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.743446294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788751	2541337	2542424	277848	278886	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC1805.14	swc2	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984597561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788752	2541337	2541478	277848	277980	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC2F7.17	swc2	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.2143902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788753	2541337	2543372	277848	279794	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAPB1A10.09	swc2	ase1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.12310325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788754	2541337	2542656	277848	279110	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC2E1P3.05c	swc2	SPAC2E1P3.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.745938384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788755	2541337	2543100	277848	279532	SPBP35G2.13c	SPAC12B10.14c	swc2	tea5	-	ppk2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.157405416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788756	2541337	2541297	277848	277809	SPBP35G2.13c	SPBC9B6.07	swc2	nop52	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.98097412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788757	2541661	2540279	278157	276810	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC3B8.04c	ace2	SPBC3B8.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.369928457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788758	2541661	2542577	278157	279033	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC19G12.15c	ace2	tpp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045541249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788759	2541661	2540105	278157	276642	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC106.04	ace2	ada1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.916659859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788760	2541661	2539949	278157	276493	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC1703.04	ace2	mlh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.695846593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788761	2541661	2542518	278157	278976	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC1B3.16c	ace2	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.782471182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788762	2541661	2542143	278157	278619	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC17C9.07	ace2	alg8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1445993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788763	2541661	2543306	278157	279730	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC56F8.14c	ace2	mug115	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.34472683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788764	2541661	2541912	278157	278402	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC222.16c	ace2	csn3	-	SPAC821.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.564537923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788765	2541661	2540863	278157	277380	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC56F2.03	ace2	SPBC56F2.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.49999721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788766	2541661	2538896	278157	275474	SPAC6G10.12c	SPCC584.11c	ace2	SPCC584.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.559449649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788767	2541661	2541117	278157	277632	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC646.13	ace2	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454751854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788768	2541661	2543434	278157	279854	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC8F11.02c	ace2	dph3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913702855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788769	2541661	2539201	278157	275772	SPAC6G10.12c	SPCC188.09c	ace2	pfl4	-	SPCC188.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.149582716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788770	2541661	2541286	278157	277799	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC9B6.11c	ace2	SPBC9B6.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.56210564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788771	2541661	2542107	278157	278583	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC30.01c	ace2	sec72	-	sec7b|sec702	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.925106696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788772	2541661	2541058	278157	277573	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC3H7.09	ace2	erf2	-	mug142	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.549851126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788773	2541661	2539564	278157	276125	SPAC6G10.12c	SPCC550.12	ace2	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.745365475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788774	2541661	2541026	278157	277541	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC337.09	ace2	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.630888103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788775	2541661	2539575	278157	276135	SPAC6G10.12c	SPCP20C8.02c	ace2	SPCP20C8.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512678365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788776	2541661	2542318	278157	278784	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC16C9.05	ace2	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.560018768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788777	2541661	2539823	278157	276373	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC16A3.18	ace2	cip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567394887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788778	2541661	2541522	278157	278023	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC23E2.01	ace2	fep1	-	gaf2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.803597488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788779	2541661	2542845	278157	279291	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC824.04	ace2	SPAC824.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.196013121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788780	2541661	2542981	278157	279419	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC824.02	ace2	bst1	-	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.091806958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788781	2541661	2539310	278157	275877	SPAC6G10.12c	SPCC285.17	ace2	spp27	-	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.502260113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788782	2541661	2542331	278157	278797	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC1834.05	ace2	alg9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.823031245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788783	2541661	2542568	278157	279024	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC1952.02	ace2	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.587155481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788784	2541661	2541544	278157	278044	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC22G7.06c	ace2	ura1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.718437689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788785	2541661	2543020	278157	279456	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC10F6.13c	ace2	SPAC10F6.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3907063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788786	2541661	2542863	278157	279309	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC13G7.04c	ace2	mac1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.840252258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788787	2541661	2540429	278157	276957	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC29A10.07	ace2	pom152	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770132488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788788	2541661	2541892	278157	278382	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAP27G11.02	ace2	SPAP27G11.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577692653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788789	2541661	2542544	278157	279001	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC18G6.10	ace2	lem2	-	heh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.862365111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788790	2541661	2541889	278157	278379	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC2F7.03c	ace2	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507264914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788791	2541661	2541578	278157	278075	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC25B8.05	ace2	deg1	-	SPAC25B8.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.413203634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788792	2541661	2541166	278157	277681	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC725.15	ace2	ura5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.623146968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788793	2541661	2542925	278157	279366	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC11E3.04c	ace2	ubc13	-	spu13|sst5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913988572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788794	2541661	2540086	278157	276624	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC16H5.12c	ace2	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.110753979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788795	2541661	2541710	278157	278205	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC343.11c	ace2	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.177856124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788796	2541661	2540538	278157	277065	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC26H8.03	ace2	cho2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925588222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788797	2541661	2540326	278157	276856	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC2G5.06c	ace2	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.374009426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788798	2541661	2541824	278157	278315	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC27E2.02	ace2	SPAC27E2.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638091717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788799	2541661	2538769	278157	275352	SPAC6G10.12c	SPCC126.04c	ace2	sgf73	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.761460681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788800	2541661	2540751	278157	277273	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC20F10.10	ace2	psl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.860673603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788801	2541661	2539974	278157	276518	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC32H8.07	ace2	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.340214598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788802	2541661	2541720	278157	278214	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC23H3.13c	ace2	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.312824945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788803	2541661	2540836	278157	277354	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC18H10.19	ace2	vps38	-	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.013188982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788804	2541661	2543378	278157	279800	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC3H8.07c	ace2	pac10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.265298662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788805	2541661	2539958	278157	276502	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC1718.07c	ace2	zfs1	-	moc4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7773871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788806	2541661	2541900	278157	278390	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC23H4.17c	ace2	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.721547186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788807	2541661	2540327	278157	276857	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC31F10.07	ace2	lsb5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873758895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788808	2541661	2542549	278157	279006	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC19A8.11c	ace2	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.214529783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788809	2541661	2539408	278157	275973	SPAC6G10.12c	SPCC576.12c	ace2	mhf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391815441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788810	2541661	2539215	278157	275785	SPAC6G10.12c	SPCC285.16c	ace2	msh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.260564376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788811	2541661	2539317	278157	275883	SPAC6G10.12c	SPCC16A11.08	ace2	atg20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642095035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788812	2541661	2539348	278157	275914	SPAC6G10.12c	SPCC18B5.07c	ace2	nup61	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.670573353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788813	2541661	2541708	278157	278203	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC31A2.02	ace2	trm112	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.314732482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788814	2541661	2541053	278157	277568	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC56F2.10c	ace2	alg5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.917990143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788815	2541661	2539402	278157	275967	SPAC6G10.12c	SPCC613.03	ace2	SPCC613.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.459710274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788816	2541661	2540599	278157	277125	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC29A3.10c	ace2	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.134351012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788817	2541661	2540229	278157	276761	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC31F10.15c	ace2	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569666076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788818	2541661	3361105	278157	280181	SPAC6G10.12c	SPCC188.10c	ace2	SPCC188.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.140897628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788819	2541661	2539993	278157	276537	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC1105.05	ace2	exg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.989923052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788820	2541661	2541337	278157	277848	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBP35G2.13c	ace2	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.894629325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788821	2541661	2543254	278157	279682	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC1006.03c	ace2	red1	-	iss3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.970838908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788822	2541661	2543009	278157	279447	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC10F6.06	ace2	vip1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.381928903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788823	2541661	2540589	278157	277115	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC20F10.06	ace2	mad2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709330709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788824	2541661	2541896	278157	278386	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC23H4.16c	ace2	SPAC23H4.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.399299923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788825	2541661	2540946	278157	277462	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC36.04	ace2	cys11	-	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.747508877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788826	2541661	2542869	278157	279314	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC140.02	ace2	gar2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.149637241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788827	2541661	2541144	278157	277659	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC685.06	ace2	rps001	-	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.395124546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788828	2541661	2539763	278157	276314	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC1861.05	ace2	SPBC1861.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.655155301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788829	2541661	2543113	278157	279545	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC3F10.07c	ace2	erf4	-	mug91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.719497604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788830	2541661	2540706	278157	277229	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC19C7.12c	ace2	omh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196379309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788831	2541661	2538907	278157	275484	SPAC6G10.12c	SPCC24B10.19c	ace2	nts1	-	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.116500482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788832	2541661	2539160	278157	275732	SPAC6G10.12c	SPCC18.17c	ace2	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.271126376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788833	2541661	2541786	278157	278278	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC22F3.08c	ace2	rok1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381011664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788834	2541661	2541156	278157	277671	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC685.07c	ace2	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.937616654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788835	2541661	2539101	278157	275673	SPAC6G10.12c	SPCC736.04c	ace2	gma12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.158490385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788836	2541661	2541175	278157	277689	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC839.13c	ace2	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.017014416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788837	2541661	2540061	278157	276599	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC119.12	ace2	rud3	-	SPBC119.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.708197005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788838	2541661	2539108	278157	275680	SPAC6G10.12c	SPCC1223.02	ace2	nmt1	-	thi3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.846201565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788839	2541661	2539925	278157	276469	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC16H5.13	ace2	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.677601414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788840	2541661	2540800	278157	277319	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC409.20c	ace2	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.61393252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788841	2541661	2542541	278157	278998	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC1B3.03c	ace2	wis2	-	cyp5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.39269326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788842	2541661	2542075	278157	278552	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC27D7.06	ace2	etf1	-	SPAC27D7.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.242677006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788843	2541661	2543192	278157	279621	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC343.18	ace2	rfp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.720227527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788844	2541661	2541425	278157	277930	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC2C4.17c	ace2	msy2	-	SPAC2C4.17c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.937271759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788845	2541661	2540725	278157	277248	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC215.14c	ace2	vps20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.384282525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788846	2541661	2540115	278157	276652	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC1778.02	ace2	rap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.370829163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788847	2541661	2538756	278157	275339	SPAC6G10.12c	SPCC1795.10c	ace2	SPCC1795.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807593304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788848	2541661	2541531	278157	278031	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC25A8.01c	ace2	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380614736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788849	2541661	2539013	278157	275586	SPAC6G10.12c	SPCC364.03	ace2	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.495497314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788850	2541661	2540325	278157	276855	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC21B10.10	ace2	rps402	-	rps4-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.812055389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788851	2541661	2539668	278157	276223	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC11B10.10c	ace2	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.334042899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788852	2541661	2541789	278157	278281	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC23H4.08	ace2	iwr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.752940074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788853	2541661	2543420	278157	279842	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC3H1.04c	ace2	mdm31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.127328895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788854	2541661	2542574	278157	279030	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC186.05c	ace2	SPAC186.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.801698325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788855	2541661	2543516	278157	279934	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC4F10.11	ace2	spn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449792979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788856	2541661	2540333	278157	276863	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC21B10.07	ace2	SPBC21B10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567169277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788857	2541661	2539170	278157	275741	SPAC6G10.12c	SPCC306.02c	ace2	SPCC306.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864094587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788858	2541661	2539205	278157	275775	SPAC6G10.12c	SPCC4B3.15	ace2	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.396129482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788859	2541661	2542442	278157	278904	SPAC6G10.12c	SPACUNK12.02c	ace2	cmk1	-	CaMK-I|SPAC25D11.02C	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.203253051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788860	2541661	2539920	278157	276464	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC119.08	ace2	pmk1	-	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.493368305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788861	2541661	2540146	278157	276683	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC17A3.06	ace2	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.591044714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788862	2541661	2539189	278157	275760	SPAC6G10.12c	SPCC1682.16	ace2	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.784310257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788863	2541661	2539178	278157	275749	SPAC6G10.12c	SPCC1682.14	ace2	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.651677461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788864	2541661	2541941	278157	278428	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC20H4.03c	ace2	tfs1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514538479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788865	2541661	2543379	278157	279801	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC821.09	ace2	eng1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.774261463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788866	2541661	2541675	278157	278171	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC22F8.12c	ace2	shf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769110954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788867	2541661	2543076	278157	279509	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC30C2.07	ace2	SPAC30C2.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92139095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788868	2541661	2542175	278157	278650	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC1F3.02c	ace2	mkh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.689613757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788869	2541661	2542399	278157	278863	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC1805.10	ace2	SPAC1805.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.264023794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788870	2541661	2541869	278157	278359	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC22F3.13	ace2	tsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197131171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788871	2541661	2541491	278157	277993	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC2C4.16c	ace2	rps801	-	rps8|rps8-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.878351688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788872	2541661	2543374	278157	279796	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAPB1A10.08	ace2	SPAPB1A10.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452662136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788873	2541661	2541272	278157	277786	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC947.03c	ace2	naa38	-	mak31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.496583375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788874	2541661	2542094	278157	278571	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC29B12.06c	ace2	rcd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.339957216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788875	2541661	2540208	278157	276741	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBC9B6.03	ace2	SPBC9B6.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.19209429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788876	2541661	2542208	278157	278683	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC17G8.08c	ace2	SPAC17G8.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.728499026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788877	2541661	2538730	278157	275314	SPAC6G10.12c	SPCC31H12.02c	ace2	mug73	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.985096389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788878	2543222	2540161	279650	276696	SPAC821.08c	SPBC13E7.03c	slp1	SPBC13E7.03c	cdc20	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.440311433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788879	2543222	2542418	279650	278881	SPAC821.08c	SPAC1805.07c	slp1	dad2	cdc20	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327084461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788880	2541561	2538847	278060	275428	SPAC24B11.07c	SPCC594.06c	SPAC24B11.07c	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.766947503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788881	2541561	2543681	278060	280095	SPAC24B11.07c	SPAC9.02c	SPAC24B11.07c	SPAC9.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.508298593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788882	2541561	2540533	278060	277061	SPAC24B11.07c	SPBC29A10.16c	SPAC24B11.07c	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.889692326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788883	2539733	2543317	276285	279741	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC823.14	pab2	ptf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.888403816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788884	2539733	2540105	276285	276642	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC106.04	pab2	ada1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.251038274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788885	2539733	2542598	276285	279052	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC6G10.08	pab2	idp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578680495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788886	2539733	2541656	276285	278152	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC25H1.06	pab2	pcf3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.079340086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788887	2539733	2541343	276285	277854	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBPB2B2.19c	pab2	SPBPB2B2.19c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390872516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788888	2539733	2540913	276285	277429	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC56F2.08c	pab2	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.045668679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788889	2539733	2542372	276285	278836	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC1F3.03	pab2	SPAC1F3.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.910484801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788890	2539733	2542066	276285	278543	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC227.05	pab2	SPAC227.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.165693357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788891	2539733	2541570	276285	278067	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC6G9.09c	pab2	rpl2401	-	rpl24|rpl24-01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636547772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788892	2539733	2540956	276285	277472	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC409.06	pab2	uch2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.076604766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788893	2539733	2538977	276285	275551	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC1020.06c	pab2	tal1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990193313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788894	2539733	2543064	276285	279497	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC3G6.01	pab2	hrp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.351757814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788895	2539733	2542358	276285	278823	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC1782.09c	pab2	clp1	-	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638187271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788896	2539733	2541134	276285	277649	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC776.16	pab2	mis20	-	SPBC776.16|eic2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931439085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788897	2539733	2540068	276285	276606	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC1734.12c	pab2	alg12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932977381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788898	2539733	2543559	276285	279975	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC664.04c	pab2	rps1602	-	rps16|rps16-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.316719773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788899	2539733	2540347	276285	276876	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC30B4.08	pab2	eri1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.548856449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788900	2539733	2541374	276285	277885	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBPB10D8.06c	pab2	SPBPB10D8.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.777827949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788901	2539733	2540686	276285	277211	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC21D10.10	pab2	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.650493398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788902	2539733	2539201	276285	275772	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC188.09c	pab2	pfl4	-	SPCC188.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.121394483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788903	2539733	2539890	276285	276436	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC16C6.03c	pab2	SPBC16C6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.87257759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788904	2539733	2540664	276285	277189	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC215.02	pab2	bob1	-	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.473301966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788905	2539733	2538806	276285	275387	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC1840.09	pab2	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379185335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788906	2539733	2540999	276285	277515	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC4B4.04	pab2	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990507719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788907	2539733	2543658	276285	280072	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC644.09	pab2	SPAC644.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.904328014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788908	2539733	2542468	276285	278929	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC1D4.09c	pab2	rtf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.250462828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788909	2539733	2541500	276285	278002	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC227.18	pab2	lys3	-	SPAC2F7.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.619749124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788910	2539733	2541682	276285	278178	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC15F9.02	pab2	seh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511390167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788911	2539733	2539564	276285	276125	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC550.12	pab2	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.846406197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788912	2539733	2539045	276285	275618	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC1235.05c	pab2	fft2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.99466845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788913	2539733	2538801	276285	275382	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC285.13c	pab2	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.010256013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788914	2539733	2542689	276285	279142	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC29B12.04	pab2	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.560140694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788915	2539733	2539472	276285	276035	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC794.03	pab2	SPCC794.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505708628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788916	2539733	2539434	276285	275997	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC757.09c	pab2	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.475312332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788917	2539733	2543453	276285	279873	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC3G9.03	pab2	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.617231759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788918	2539733	2540692	276285	277217	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC800.07c	pab2	tsf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.707305045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788919	2539733	2539331	276285	275897	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC24B10.09	pab2	rps1702	-	rps17|rps17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45059304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788920	2539733	2542555	276285	279012	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC1952.06c	pab2	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.535845185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788921	2539733	2540220	276285	276753	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC337.03	pab2	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.46102524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788922	2539733	2539797	276285	276347	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC16G5.14c	pab2	rps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.326606293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788923	2539733	2540698	276285	277222	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC215.11c	pab2	SPBC215.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444462447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788924	2539733	2541119	276285	277634	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC651.11c	pab2	apm3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.456049414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788925	2539733	2542012	276285	278495	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC23C11.02c	pab2	rps23	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389481469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788926	2539733	2540727	276285	277250	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC1921.03c	pab2	mex67	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.029707745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788927	2539733	2542022	276285	278505	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC23A1.03	pab2	apt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.876850123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788928	2539733	3361342	276285	280418	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC16D10.07c	pab2	sir2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.29521612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788929	2539733	2542318	276285	278784	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC16C9.05	pab2	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.34958285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788930	2539733	2542277	276285	278746	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC17A5.02c	pab2	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.036256181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788931	2539733	2539792	276285	276342	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC1271.14	pab2	SPBC1271.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.370419764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788932	2539733	2543308	276285	279732	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC694.04c	pab2	SPAC694.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.913653134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788933	2539733	2540851	276285	277368	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC4F6.04	pab2	rpl2502	-	rpl23a-2|rpl25b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329124758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788934	2539733	2540595	276285	277121	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC21C3.02c	pab2	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.0370194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788935	2539733	2539525	276285	276087	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC613.01	pab2	SPCC613.01	-	SPCC757.14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094757002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788936	2539733	2540059	276285	276597	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC1198.01	pab2	fmd2	-	SPBC1198.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.465299986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788937	2539733	2543563	276285	279979	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC664.02c	pab2	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.635220626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788938	2539733	2542082	276285	278559	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC29B12.10c	pab2	pgt1	-	opt1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386713081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788939	2539733	2543584	276285	279999	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAPB1E7.11c	pab2	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.940045109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788940	2539733	2543426	276285	279846	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC631.02	pab2	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.988931029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788941	2539733	2538972	276285	275546	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC1739.15	pab2	wtf21	-	wtf3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.805166237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788942	2539733	2538906	276285	275483	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC1259.03	pab2	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.645819751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788943	2539733	2542791	276285	279240	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC167.04	pab2	pam17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.839442725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788944	2539733	2540825	276285	277343	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC428.08c	pab2	clr4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.859793003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788945	2539733	3361543	276285	280619	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC9.13c	pab2	cwf16	-	SPAPJ735.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.072664663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788946	2539733	2540964	276285	277480	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC365.16	pab2	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.031598089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788947	2539733	2540222	276285	276755	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC32F12.03c	pab2	gpx1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462386408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788948	2539733	2539467	276285	276030	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC417.07c	pab2	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770110503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788949	2539733	3361461	276285	280537	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC11H11.01	pab2	sst6	-	cps23	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.19969899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788950	2539733	2540312	276285	276842	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC31F10.08	pab2	mde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382080051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788951	2539733	2541353	276285	277864	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBP35G2.11c	pab2	SPBP35G2.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091373512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788952	2539733	2540892	276285	277408	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC530.01	pab2	gyp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818831538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788953	2539733	2543593	276285	280008	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC4G9.10	pab2	arg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.465200904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788954	2539733	2542463	276285	278924	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC1834.03c	pab2	hhf1	-	h4.1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.814270687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788955	2539733	2542123	276285	278599	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC18G6.15	pab2	mal3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.815382139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788956	2539733	2540352	276285	276881	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC215.03c	pab2	csn1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200055941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788957	2539733	2541192	276285	277706	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC83.17	pab2	SPBC83.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.562436761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788958	2539733	2543638	276285	280052	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC3H8.09c	pab2	nab3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.052929388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788959	2539733	2541889	276285	278379	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC2F7.03c	pab2	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.732313256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788960	2539733	2542297	276285	278764	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC17H9.06c	pab2	SPAC17H9.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807705182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788961	2539733	2542817	276285	279264	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC13G6.02c	pab2	rps101	-	rps1-1|rps3a-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440678415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788962	2539733	2539999	276285	276543	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC1734.15	pab2	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.741086853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788963	2539733	2541496	276285	277998	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC23D3.09	pab2	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.089649673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788964	2539733	2541183	276285	277697	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC725.14	pab2	arg6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.418507728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788965	2539733	2543246	276285	279674	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAPB8E5.05	pab2	mfm1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.664724611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788966	2539733	2543643	276285	280057	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC3G9.07c	pab2	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.903691641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788967	2539733	2541899	276285	278389	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC22E12.11c	pab2	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.834395522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788968	2539733	2540231	276285	276763	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC336.14c	pab2	ppk26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773270216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788969	2539733	2539667	276285	276222	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC13G1.08c	pab2	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.22702331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788970	2539733	2542126	276285	278602	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC1B3.05	pab2	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.488888003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788971	2539733	2542032	276285	278514	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC23C11.04c	pab2	pnk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.191534499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788972	2539733	2539815	276285	276365	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC1105.02c	pab2	lys4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.282842894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788973	2539733	2538849	276285	275430	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC330.14c	pab2	rpl2402	-	rpl24-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.945953794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788974	2539733	2539974	276285	276518	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC32H8.07	pab2	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.252621257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788975	2539733	2541588	276285	278085	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC1565.03	pab2	SPAC1565.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92397213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788976	2539733	2540107	276285	276644	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC106.08c	pab2	mug2	-	B13958-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.050623683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788977	2539733	2542431	276285	278893	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC1A6.01c	pab2	SPAC1A6.01c	-	SPAC23C4.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.440449529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788978	2539733	2543378	276285	279800	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC3H8.07c	pab2	pac10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.175069273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788979	2539733	2541900	276285	278390	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC23H4.17c	pab2	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.758147214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788980	2539733	2542867	276285	279312	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC343.16	pab2	lys2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.87233703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788981	2539733	2543301	276285	279726	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC977.17	pab2	SPAC977.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.140897693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788982	2539733	2540318	276285	276848	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC30B4.04c	pab2	sol1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.124907394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788983	2539733	2539408	276285	275973	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC576.12c	pab2	mhf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329706635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788984	2539733	2539953	276285	276497	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC1709.11c	pab2	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.731726707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788985	2539733	2543443	276285	279863	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC3H1.12c	pab2	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.702590186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788986	2539733	2542720	276285	279171	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC25G10.05c	pab2	his1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452762275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788987	2539733	2538708	276285	275292	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC594.01	pab2	SPCC594.01	-	SPCC736.16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.26123146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788988	2539733	2542597	276285	279051	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAP8A3.07c	pab2	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.447028044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788989	2539733	2539847	276285	276395	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC530.14c	pab2	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.364798783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788990	2539733	2541296	276285	277808	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBP8B7.06	pab2	rpp201	-	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.187543234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788991	2539733	2541186	276285	277700	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC725.01	pab2	SPBC725.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.685343726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788992	2539733	2540882	276285	277399	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC4F6.08c	pab2	mrpl39	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988585953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788993	2539733	2538884	276285	275462	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC1393.08	pab2	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.336548317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788994	2539733	2539421	276285	275986	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC794.11c	pab2	ent3	-	SPCC794.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447119328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788995	2539733	2539853	276285	276401	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC1347.07	pab2	rex2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810023746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788996	2539733	2539812	276285	276362	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC1347.02	pab2	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.369235308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788997	2539733	2540926	276285	277442	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC359.06	pab2	mug14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.270096863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788998	2539733	2540930	276285	277446	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC354.10	pab2	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.624092739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
788999	2539733	2542602	276285	279056	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC186.09	pab2	SPAC186.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.561339087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789000	2539733	3361520	276285	280596	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC1610.02c	pab2	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443011435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789001	2539733	2541017	276285	277532	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC36.07	pab2	elp1	-	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512155208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789002	2539733	2540743	276285	277266	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC215.06c	pab2	SPBC215.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866656575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789003	2539733	2543493	276285	279913	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC4G8.08	pab2	SPAC4G8.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454095018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789004	2539733	2542875	276285	279320	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC13G7.02c	pab2	ssa1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.918301074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789005	2539733	2539763	276285	276314	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC1861.05	pab2	SPBC1861.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331554373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789006	2539733	2542806	276285	279254	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC1610.01	pab2	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.386928458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789007	2539733	2539476	276285	276039	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC364.04c	pab2	coy1	-	SPCC364.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.921081814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789008	2539733	2542407	276285	278871	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC19B12.06c	pab2	SPAC19B12.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042815273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789009	2539733	2543391	276285	279813	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC4G9.09c	pab2	arg11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.336788288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789010	2539733	2541156	276285	277671	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC685.07c	pab2	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.879777109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789011	2539733	2538762	276285	275345	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC306.04c	pab2	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.803904002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789012	2539733	2539362	276285	275928	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC18B5.10c	pab2	SPCC18B5.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516903003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789013	2539733	2543628	276285	280042	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC3H8.10	pab2	spo20	-	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327578803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789014	2539733	2542516	276285	278974	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC2F7.04	pab2	pmc2	-	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.97440058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789015	2539733	2539555	276285	276116	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC4B3.08	pab2	lsg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.850938635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789016	2539733	2540619	276285	277145	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC25H2.15	pab2	SPBC25H2.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645409654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789017	2539733	2543106	276285	279538	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC3A11.13	pab2	SPAC3A11.13	-	SPAC3H5.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.163822566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789018	2539733	2539137	276285	275709	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC1682.08c	pab2	mcp2	-	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.419495601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789019	2539733	2543670	276285	280084	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAPB1E7.06c	pab2	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.752120637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789020	2539733	2543304	276285	279728	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC6B12.12	pab2	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.765616868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789021	2539733	2539159	276285	275731	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC1235.01	pab2	SPCC1235.01	-	SPCC320.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.681183827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789022	2539733	2538966	276285	275540	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC18.10	pab2	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.06889258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789023	2539733	2543136	276285	279568	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC1348.07	pab2	SPBC1348.07	-	SPAC1348.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.128422945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789024	2539733	2542940	276285	279381	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC31A2.12	pab2	SPAC31A2.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.065009411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789025	2539733	2541531	276285	278031	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC25A8.01c	pab2	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.04752704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789026	2539733	2539013	276285	275586	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC364.03	pab2	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.501185379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789027	2539733	2543219	276285	279647	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC56F8.09	pab2	rrp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.042801828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789028	2539733	2541948	276285	278435	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC222.13c	pab2	SPAC222.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924207132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789029	2539733	2542731	276285	279181	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC5H10.09c	pab2	SPAC5H10.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.254127189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789030	2539733	2542418	276285	278881	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC1805.07c	pab2	dad2	-	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.124451837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789031	2539733	2541229	276285	277743	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC839.05c	pab2	rps1701	-	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503118239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789032	2539733	2539514	276285	276076	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC663.14c	pab2	trp663	-	SPCC663.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331147387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789033	2539733	2539772	276285	276323	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC1734.05c	pab2	spf31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.290086286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789034	2539733	2542222	276285	278695	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC31G5.18c	pab2	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.59540103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789035	2539733	2543437	276285	279857	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAPB1A10.14	pab2	pof15	-	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.99001405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789036	2539733	2542826	276285	279273	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC13G6.09	pab2	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.143757038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789037	2539733	2539668	276285	276223	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC11B10.10c	pab2	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.1849286	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789038	2539733	2541404	276285	277913	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBPB2B2.18	pab2	SPBPB2B2.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.935489061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789039	2539733	2543420	276285	279842	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC3H1.04c	pab2	mdm31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.010244434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789040	2539733	2542250	276285	278720	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC17D4.03c	pab2	cis4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200327999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789041	2539733	2539205	276285	275775	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC4B3.15	pab2	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.874986586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789042	2539733	2539375	276285	275941	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC4G3.11	pab2	mug154	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.242601684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789043	2539733	2543380	276285	279802	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC4G9.16c	pab2	rpl901	-	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.37669634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789044	2539733	2540146	276285	276683	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC17A3.06	pab2	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.768595459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789045	2539733	2538840	276285	275421	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC736.07c	pab2	SPCC736.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512236615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789046	2539733	2541806	276285	278297	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC4G8.13c	pab2	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.901834078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789047	2539733	2542886	276285	279331	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC1486.01	pab2	SPAC1486.01	-	sod2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.184952859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789048	2539733	2542424	276285	278886	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC1805.14	pab2	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864686371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789049	2539733	2541050	276285	277565	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC428.05c	pab2	arg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.021686158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789050	2539733	2539085	276285	275657	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC285.15c	pab2	rps2802	-	rps28|rps28-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.902849992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789051	2539733	2543372	276285	279794	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAPB1A10.09	pab2	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.992256642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789052	2539733	2541124	276285	277639	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC646.02	pab2	cwf11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.495458784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789053	2539733	2543472	276285	279892	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC959.04c	pab2	omh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.677058725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789054	2539733	2542609	276285	279063	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC31G5.04	pab2	lys12	-	SPAC31G5.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714678848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789055	2539733	2540649	276285	277174	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC19F8.08	pab2	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.323696758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789056	2539733	2538730	276285	275314	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC31H12.02c	pab2	mug73	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098741787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789057	2540396	2539050	276924	275623	SPBC31F10.12	SPCC11E10.08	tma20	rik1	SPBC31F10.12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.257287269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789058	2540396	2540060	276924	276598	SPBC31F10.12	SPBC106.01	tma20	mph1	SPBC31F10.12	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.584617974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789059	2540396	2543064	276924	279497	SPBC31F10.12	SPAC3G6.01	tma20	hrp3	SPBC31F10.12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775144055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789060	2540396	2542358	276924	278823	SPBC31F10.12	SPAC1782.09c	tma20	clp1	SPBC31F10.12	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.345677868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789061	2540396	2543164	276924	279595	SPBC31F10.12	SPAC3G6.06c	tma20	rad2	SPBC31F10.12	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.302982496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789062	2540396	2540686	276924	277211	SPBC31F10.12	SPBC21D10.10	tma20	bdc1	SPBC31F10.12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.466095821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789063	2540396	2540491	276924	277019	SPBC31F10.12	SPBC28E12.04	tma20	SPBC28E12.04	SPBC31F10.12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.988520395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789064	2540396	2540015	276924	276559	SPBC31F10.12	SPBC1685.02c	tma20	rps1202	SPBC31F10.12	rps12-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.013654226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789065	2540396	2539249	276924	275819	SPBC31F10.12	SPCC1450.05c	tma20	rox3	SPBC31F10.12	med19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.11749306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789066	2540396	2539797	276924	276347	SPBC31F10.12	SPBC16G5.14c	tma20	rps3	SPBC31F10.12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.444408637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789067	2540396	2540929	276924	277445	SPBC31F10.12	SPBC354.03	tma20	swd3	SPBC31F10.12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.373719777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789068	2540396	2542318	276924	278784	SPBC31F10.12	SPAC16C9.05	tma20	cph1	SPBC31F10.12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.561873896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789069	2540396	2543685	276924	280099	SPBC31F10.12	SPAC3C7.03c	tma20	rad55	SPBC31F10.12	rhp55	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.840078127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789070	2540396	2539823	276924	276373	SPBC31F10.12	SPBC16A3.18	tma20	cip1	SPBC31F10.12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.612148448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789071	2540396	2543584	276924	279999	SPBC31F10.12	SPAPB1E7.11c	tma20	SPAPB1E7.11c	SPBC31F10.12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.862363938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789072	2540396	2542036	276924	278518	SPBC31F10.12	SPAC23A1.19c	tma20	hrq1	SPBC31F10.12	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.839428612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789073	2540396	2539388	276924	275953	SPBC31F10.12	SPCC24B10.12	tma20	cgi121	SPBC31F10.12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.841900974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789074	2540396	2540797	276924	277316	SPBC31F10.12	SPBC18H10.11c	tma20	ppr2	SPBC31F10.12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.997502774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789075	2540396	2541249	276924	277763	SPBC31F10.12	SPBC947.01	tma20	alf1	SPBC31F10.12	SPBC947.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.04312099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789076	2540396	2541250	276924	277764	SPBC31F10.12	SPBC8D2.17	tma20	gmh4	SPBC31F10.12	SPBC8D2.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384089053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789077	2540396	2541776	276924	278270	SPBC31F10.12	SPAC23H3.05c	tma20	swd1	SPBC31F10.12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.70378586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789078	2540396	2542863	276924	279309	SPBC31F10.12	SPAC13G7.04c	tma20	mac1	SPBC31F10.12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.830562181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789079	2540396	2543412	276924	279834	SPBC31F10.12	SPAC637.07	tma20	moe1	SPBC31F10.12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.12698469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789080	2540396	2539831	276924	276380	SPBC31F10.12	SPBC15C4.05	tma20	dhx29	SPBC31F10.12	SPBC15C4.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.271887488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789081	2540396	2541496	276924	277998	SPBC31F10.12	SPAC23D3.09	tma20	arp42	SPBC31F10.12	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.469688692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789082	2540396	2541183	276924	277697	SPBC31F10.12	SPBC725.14	tma20	arg6	SPBC31F10.12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.312249699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789083	2540396	2542032	276924	278514	SPBC31F10.12	SPAC23C11.04c	tma20	pnk1	SPBC31F10.12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.822683808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789084	2540396	2543378	276924	279800	SPBC31F10.12	SPAC3H8.07c	tma20	pac10	SPBC31F10.12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.902377028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789085	2540396	2539481	276924	276044	SPBC31F10.12	SPCC622.16c	tma20	epe1	SPBC31F10.12	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258750102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789086	2540396	2541009	276924	277524	SPBC31F10.12	SPBC428.04	tma20	apq12	SPBC31F10.12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.050440295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789087	2540396	2540990	276924	277506	SPBC31F10.12	SPBC36B7.06c	tma20	mug20	SPBC31F10.12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.626913279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789088	2540396	2541536	276924	278036	SPBC31F10.12	SPAC1071.02	tma20	mms19	SPBC31F10.12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.847766362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789089	2540396	2541742	276924	278236	SPBC31F10.12	SPAC22H10.09	tma20	SPAC22H10.09	SPBC31F10.12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.327061216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789090	2540396	2541713	276924	278208	SPBC31F10.12	SPAC3A12.12	tma20	atp11	SPBC31F10.12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.022556258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789091	2540396	2538762	276924	275345	SPBC31F10.12	SPCC306.04c	tma20	set1	SPBC31F10.12	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511038709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789092	2540396	2543670	276924	280084	SPBC31F10.12	SPAPB1E7.06c	tma20	eme1	SPBC31F10.12	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.379190521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789093	2540396	2540498	276924	277026	SPBC31F10.12	SPBC27.02c	tma20	ask1	SPBC31F10.12	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.006702129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789094	2540396	2543304	276924	279728	SPBC31F10.12	SPAC6B12.12	tma20	tom70	SPBC31F10.12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.685142487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789095	2540396	2539239	276924	275809	SPBC31F10.12	SPCC1020.10	tma20	oca2	SPBC31F10.12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.938967319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789096	2540396	2539136	276924	275708	SPBC31F10.12	SPCC1919.05	tma20	SPCC1919.05	SPBC31F10.12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.307792543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789097	2540396	2540677	276924	277202	SPBC31F10.12	SPBC21B10.03c	tma20	ath1	SPBC31F10.12	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.153037422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789098	2540396	2540555	276924	277082	SPBC31F10.12	SPBP16F5.02	tma20	mcs2	SPBC31F10.12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.913769068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789099	2540396	2543380	276924	279802	SPBC31F10.12	SPAC4G9.16c	tma20	rpl901	SPBC31F10.12	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.431029398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789100	2540396	3361360	276924	280436	SPBC31F10.12	SPBC1652.01	tma20	SPBC1652.01	SPBC31F10.12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.18729544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789101	2540396	2543384	276924	279806	SPBC31F10.12	SPAC637.06	tma20	gmh5	SPBC31F10.12	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327561975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789102	2540396	2543387	276924	279809	SPBC31F10.12	SPAPB1E7.02c	tma20	mcl1	SPBC31F10.12	slr3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.822816331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789103	2540396	2541050	276924	277565	SPBC31F10.12	SPBC428.05c	tma20	arg12	SPBC31F10.12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578305235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789104	2540396	2542561	276924	279017	SPBC31F10.12	SPAC31G5.17c	tma20	rps1001	SPBC31F10.12	rps10-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.333183452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789105	2540673	2539050	277198	275623	SPBC1D7.03	SPCC11E10.08	mug80	rik1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.197764734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789106	2540673	2539034	277198	275607	SPBC1D7.03	SPCC830.10	mug80	ham1	-	SPCC830.10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.686272725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789107	2540673	2541902	277198	278392	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC27E2.07	mug80	pvg2	-	mug53	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.713074896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789108	2540673	2542382	277198	278846	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC6G10.06	mug80	SPAC6G10.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.693052786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789109	2540673	2541512	277198	278013	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC11E3.08c	mug80	nse6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.263324578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789110	2540673	2541913	277198	278403	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC227.04	mug80	atg10	-	SPAC227.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.062763418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789111	2540673	2541570	277198	278067	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC6G9.09c	mug80	rpl2401	-	rpl24|rpl24-01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.146312193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789112	2540673	2542812	277198	279259	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC6F6.01	mug80	cch1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331164167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789113	2540673	2543064	277198	279497	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC3G6.01	mug80	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.046628335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789114	2540673	2540131	277198	276668	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC1778.05c	mug80	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511353383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789115	2540673	2542358	277198	278823	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC1782.09c	mug80	clp1	-	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.616443908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789116	2540673	2542293	277198	278761	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC17G8.14c	mug80	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.061935462	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789117	2540673	2538896	277198	275474	SPBC1D7.03	SPCC584.11c	mug80	SPCC584.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812152847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789118	2540673	2541130	277198	277645	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC776.11	mug80	rpl2801	-	rpl28-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097741659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789119	2540673	2541853	277198	278344	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC2F3.11	mug80	SPAC2F3.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980304172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789120	2540673	2540410	277198	276938	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC2D10.04	mug80	SPBC2D10.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779906734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789121	2540673	2541856	277198	278347	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC23H3.08c	mug80	bub3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.161303896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789122	2540673	2541633	277198	278129	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC664.01c	mug80	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.115961218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789123	2540673	2541733	277198	278227	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC27F1.03c	mug80	uch1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.620518627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789124	2540673	2540686	277198	277211	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC21D10.10	mug80	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325216264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789125	2540673	2542701	277198	279154	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC26H5.05	mug80	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.537137451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789126	2540673	2540535	277198	277062	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC215.01	mug80	SPBC215.01	-	SPBC3B9.20	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983858623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789127	2540673	2538806	277198	275387	SPBC1D7.03	SPCC1840.09	mug80	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.715583482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789128	2540673	2539451	277198	276014	SPBC1D7.03	SPCC63.13	mug80	SPCC63.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035866042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789129	2540673	2540564	277198	277091	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC530.03c	mug80	bag102	-	bag1-b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.971108233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789130	2540673	2541208	277198	277722	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC887.04c	mug80	lub1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.352502012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789131	2540673	2542677	277198	279130	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC26F1.10c	mug80	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.617580158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789132	2540673	2539970	277198	276514	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC1773.01	mug80	far8	-	SPBC1773.01|csc3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.409123909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789133	2540673	2539443	277198	276006	SPBC1D7.03	SPCC736.02	mug80	SPCC736.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871186995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789134	2540673	2539510	277198	276072	SPBC1D7.03	SPCC4G3.04c	mug80	coq5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816337404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789135	2540673	2541994	277198	278478	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC26A3.14c	mug80	SPAC26A3.14c	-	SPAC23A6.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449608429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789136	2540673	2539564	277198	276125	SPBC1D7.03	SPCC550.12	mug80	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.516974494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789137	2540673	2538801	277198	275382	SPBC1D7.03	SPCC285.13c	mug80	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.349883687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789138	2540673	2540919	277198	277435	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC543.07	mug80	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.447628046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789139	2540673	2540945	277198	277461	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC342.06c	mug80	rtt109	-	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.307322271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789140	2540673	2539434	277198	275997	SPBC1D7.03	SPCC757.09c	mug80	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.340866526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789141	2540673	2540929	277198	277445	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC354.03	mug80	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.40821009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789142	2540673	2541558	277198	278057	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC1F7.08	mug80	fio1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.261694647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789143	2540673	2540727	277198	277250	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC1921.03c	mug80	mex67	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.466528838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789144	2540673	2542318	277198	278784	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC16C9.05	mug80	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.625574377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789145	2540673	2539792	277198	276342	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC1271.14	mug80	SPBC1271.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.12297692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789146	2540673	2540663	277198	277188	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC56F2.06	mug80	mug147	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.782513629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789147	2540673	2543686	277198	280100	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC3C7.14c	mug80	obr1	-	apt1|uhp1|p25	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.472797882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789148	2540673	2541105	277198	277620	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC685.02	mug80	exo5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.626746809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789149	2540673	2541004	277198	277519	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC3F6.01c	mug80	SPBC3F6.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706862862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789150	2540673	2542530	277198	278988	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC1399.02	mug80	SPAC1399.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815535043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789151	2540673	2538906	277198	275483	SPBC1D7.03	SPCC1259.03	mug80	rpa12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.393172868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789152	2540673	2542253	277198	278723	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC17H9.04c	mug80	SPAC17H9.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.261527681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789153	2540673	3361456	277198	280532	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC1142.03c	mug80	swi2	-	SPAC17G6.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.668681472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789154	2540673	2540825	277198	277343	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC428.08c	mug80	clr4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.94003513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789155	2540673	2541926	277198	278414	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC222.14c	mug80	SPAC222.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.716855746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789156	2540673	2542568	277198	279024	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC1952.02	mug80	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.256449018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789157	2540673	2542239	277198	278711	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC18G6.02c	mug80	chp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.292012758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789158	2540673	2539023	277198	275596	SPBC1D7.03	SPCC594.05c	mug80	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.745439665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789159	2540673	2542036	277198	278518	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC23A1.19c	mug80	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983155051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789160	2540673	2539056	277198	275629	SPBC1D7.03	SPCC126.11c	mug80	SPCC126.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.510752625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789161	2540673	2539388	277198	275953	SPBC1D7.03	SPCC24B10.12	mug80	cgi121	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.161531157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789162	2540673	2542311	277198	278777	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC16A10.05c	mug80	dad1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.033642957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789163	2540673	2540906	277198	277422	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC365.20c	mug80	pnc1	-	SPBC557.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927267177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789164	2540673	2539870	277198	276416	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC1709.18	mug80	tif452	-	SPBC409.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.897707202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789165	2540673	2541801	277198	278292	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC2F7.08c	mug80	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.762424388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789166	2540673	2541249	277198	277763	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC947.01	mug80	alf1	-	SPBC947.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462322678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789167	2540673	2542298	277198	278765	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC29A4.02c	mug80	SPAC29A4.02c	-	tef3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.894343712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789168	2540673	2542646	277198	279100	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC11H11.05c	mug80	fta6	-	sma6	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870870142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789169	2540673	2541776	277198	278270	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC23H3.05c	mug80	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.910002364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789170	2540673	2543144	277198	279576	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC3F10.05c	mug80	mug113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.272966268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789171	2540673	2543445	277198	279865	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC4F10.13c	mug80	mpd2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.86768161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789172	2540673	2543483	277198	279903	SPBC1D7.03	SPAPB2B4.02	mug80	grx5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773110064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789173	2540673	2540348	277198	276877	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC29A10.05	mug80	exo1	-	mut2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.305161123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789174	2540673	2542990	277198	279428	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC11D3.16c	mug80	SPAC11D3.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864589268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789175	2540673	2540546	277198	277073	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC25B2.06c	mug80	btb2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.441578163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789176	2540673	2540352	277198	276881	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC215.03c	mug80	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.061528328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789177	2540673	2538789	277198	275370	SPBC1D7.03	SPCC338.04	mug80	cid2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87208961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789178	2540673	2543638	277198	280052	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC3H8.09c	mug80	nab3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.018591524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789179	2540673	2542420	277198	278883	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC19D5.03	mug80	cid1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.560322835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789180	2540673	2542297	277198	278764	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC17H9.06c	mug80	SPAC17H9.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986049017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789181	2540673	2542989	277198	279427	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC11E3.13c	mug80	gas5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.554392529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789182	2540673	2542817	277198	279264	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC13G6.02c	mug80	rps101	-	rps1-1|rps3a-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865364323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789183	2540673	2539999	277198	276543	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC1734.15	mug80	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.977008951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789184	2540673	2541496	277198	277998	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC23D3.09	mug80	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.723948148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789185	2540673	2543667	277198	280081	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC4H3.02c	mug80	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.740069413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789186	2540673	2539689	277198	276244	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC1861.03	mug80	mak10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.184261382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789187	2540673	2541921	277198	278410	SPBC1D7.03	SPAP27G11.08c	mug80	meu32	-	mug11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.327825523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789188	2540673	2541381	277198	277892	SPBC1D7.03	SPBPJ4664.05	mug80	SPBPJ4664.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.837537605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789189	2540673	2540452	277198	276980	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC2A9.11c	mug80	iss9	-	SPBC2A9.11c|SPBC2D10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.617962967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789190	2540673	2539667	277198	276222	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC13G1.08c	mug80	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.539073113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789191	2540673	2542861	277198	279307	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC13G7.13c	mug80	msa1	-	SPAC6C3.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.932957978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789192	2540673	2542126	277198	278602	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC1B3.05	mug80	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.898088775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789193	2540673	2541828	277198	278319	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC22H12.05c	mug80	fsc1	-	SPAC22H12.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.902064451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789194	2540673	2538945	277198	275519	SPBC1D7.03	SPCC1739.06c	mug80	SPCC1739.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147422136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789195	2540673	2542946	277198	279386	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC6F12.03c	mug80	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.876905556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789196	2540673	2541903	277198	278393	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC22F8.05	mug80	SPAC22F8.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.556765983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789197	2540673	2540077	277198	276615	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC17D11.04c	mug80	nto1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.540537712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789198	2540673	2541241	277198	277755	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC887.17	mug80	SPBC887.17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864737777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789199	2540673	2542867	277198	279312	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC343.16	mug80	lys2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.16380953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789200	2540673	2539481	277198	276044	SPBC1D7.03	SPCC622.16c	mug80	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.988556982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789201	2540673	2541009	277198	277524	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC428.04	mug80	apq12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989781168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789202	2540673	5802861	277198	857999	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC1D4.01	mug80	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.211043494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789203	2540673	2539953	277198	276497	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC1709.11c	mug80	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.937860113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789204	2540673	2540201	277198	276734	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC13A2.04c	mug80	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.263916855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789205	2540673	2543517	277198	279935	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC3G9.05	mug80	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.129687589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789206	2540673	2540104	277198	276641	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC1709.16c	mug80	SPBC1709.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093632638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789207	2540673	2539052	277198	275625	SPBC1D7.03	SPCC663.09c	mug80	SPCC663.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98217879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789208	2540673	2541614	277198	278111	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC29A4.20	mug80	elp3	-	kat9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.77393008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789209	2540673	2539993	277198	276537	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC1105.05	mug80	exg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.348214591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789210	2540673	2539812	277198	276362	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC1347.02	mug80	fkbp39	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.423121932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789211	2540673	2541378	277198	277889	SPBC1D7.03	SPBP8B7.21	mug80	ubp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.257328334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789212	2540673	2542781	277198	279230	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC57A10.12c	mug80	ura3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045934239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789213	2540673	2543009	277198	279447	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC10F6.06	mug80	vip1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.463396318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789214	2540673	2540930	277198	277446	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC354.10	mug80	def1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.618905526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789215	2540673	2539519	277198	276081	SPBC1D7.03	SPCC364.05	mug80	vps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443642852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789216	2540673	2541017	277198	277532	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC36.07	mug80	elp1	-	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.412082088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789217	2540673	2542673	277198	279126	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC26A3.11	mug80	SPAC26A3.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.19317477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789218	2540673	2541713	277198	278208	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC3A12.12	mug80	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.463348007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789219	2540673	2542725	277198	279176	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC3A12.10	mug80	rpl2001	-	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64118168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789220	2540673	2542170	277198	278645	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC17G8.13c	mug80	mst2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.443017307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789221	2540673	2539706	277198	276259	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC16G5.13	mug80	ptf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.483668724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789222	2540673	2539476	277198	276039	SPBC1D7.03	SPCC364.04c	mug80	coy1	-	SPCC364.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982605672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789223	2540673	2538907	277198	275484	SPBC1D7.03	SPCC24B10.19c	mug80	nts1	-	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.273473291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789224	2540673	2542547	277198	279004	SPBC1D7.03	SPACUNK4.09	mug80	SPACUNK4.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.253604828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789225	2540673	2538762	277198	275345	SPBC1D7.03	SPCC306.04c	mug80	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.026591202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789226	2540673	2539101	277198	275673	SPBC1D7.03	SPCC736.04c	mug80	gma12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712476293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789227	2540673	2543619	277198	280033	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC4F10.04	mug80	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.999493194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789228	2540673	2539555	277198	276116	SPBC1D7.03	SPCC4B3.08	mug80	lsg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.126557447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789229	2540673	2543106	277198	279538	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC3A11.13	mug80	SPAC3A11.13	-	SPAC3H5.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.595884274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789230	2540673	2542883	277198	279328	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC1486.04c	mug80	alm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.997804709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789231	2540673	2540814	277198	277333	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC4B4.10c	mug80	atg5	-	mug77	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776394258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789232	2540673	2539770	277198	276321	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC1685.11	mug80	rlp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392551841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789233	2540673	2538717	277198	275301	SPBC1D7.03	SPCC1235.02	mug80	bio2	-	SPCC320.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039751799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789234	2540673	2541279	277198	277792	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC8E4.03	mug80	SPBC8E4.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.347070192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789235	2540673	2538714	277198	275298	SPBC1D7.03	SPCC330.11	mug80	btb1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92574271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789236	2540673	2541432	277198	277937	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC1F5.05c	mug80	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.379042807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789237	2540673	2543662	277198	280076	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC9.07c	mug80	SPAC9.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866585776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789238	2540673	2539816	277198	276366	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC12C2.04	mug80	SPBC12C2.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.125992698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789239	2540673	2541531	277198	278031	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC25A8.01c	mug80	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.298698769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789240	2540673	2540699	277198	277223	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC800.08	mug80	gcd10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922087981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789241	2540673	2540829	277198	277347	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC800.09	mug80	sum2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.582590604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789242	2540673	2539772	277198	276323	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC1734.05c	mug80	spf31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328433615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789243	2540673	2543427	277198	279847	SPBC1D7.03	SPAPB1A10.15	mug80	arv1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870103953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789244	2540673	2542727	277198	279177	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC26A3.02	mug80	myh1	-	myh	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.98184067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789245	2540673	2543649	277198	280063	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC3H5.11	mug80	SPAC3H5.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.409578641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789246	2540673	2541773	277198	278267	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC23H4.02	mug80	ppk9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.705240652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789247	2540673	2541789	277198	278281	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC23H4.08	mug80	iwr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.384599233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789248	2540673	2540297	277198	276828	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC24C6.08c	mug80	bhd1	-	bhd	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.275162558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789249	2540673	2542416	277198	278880	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC589.03c	mug80	SPAC589.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.465796461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789250	2540673	2542250	277198	278720	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC17D4.03c	mug80	cis4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842651271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789251	2540673	2542309	277198	278775	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC16A10.02	mug80	sub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.303533141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789252	2540673	2539205	277198	275775	SPBC1D7.03	SPCC4B3.15	mug80	mid1	-	dmf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.756533413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789253	2540673	2539726	277198	276278	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC13E7.08c	mug80	leo1	-	SPBC13E7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.558059323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789254	2540673	2539920	277198	276464	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC119.08	mug80	pmk1	-	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781532753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789255	2540673	2539375	277198	275941	SPBC1D7.03	SPCC4G3.11	mug80	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.744288091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789256	2540673	2538792	277198	275373	SPBC1D7.03	SPCP1E11.10	mug80	SPCP1E11.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.80247527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789257	2540673	2540808	277198	277327	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC418.02	mug80	SPBC418.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866402491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789258	2540673	2542630	277198	279084	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC2C4.06c	mug80	SPAC2C4.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.26664311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789259	2540673	2539700	277198	276253	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC1685.15c	mug80	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.211875528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789260	2540673	2542185	277198	278660	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC18G6.01c	mug80	SPAC18G6.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.033876072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789261	2540673	2543327	277198	279750	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC1D4.06c	mug80	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.573700944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789262	2540673	2539531	277198	276093	SPBC1D7.03	SPCC576.02	mug80	SPCC576.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.253064306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789263	2540673	2543087	277198	279520	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC30C2.04	mug80	SPAC30C2.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.822860614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789264	2540673	2542175	277198	278650	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC1F3.02c	mug80	mkh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.139427808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789265	2540673	2541872	277198	278362	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC23H4.10c	mug80	thi4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867442725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789266	2540673	2542830	277198	279277	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC57A10.08c	mug80	SPAC57A10.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2594076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789267	2540673	2541050	277198	277565	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC428.05c	mug80	arg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.883737182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789268	2540673	2543372	277198	279794	SPBC1D7.03	SPAPB1A10.09	mug80	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.422848193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789269	2540673	2542941	277198	279382	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC3C7.07c	mug80	SPAC3C7.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.668981652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789270	2540673	2541272	277198	277786	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC947.03c	mug80	naa38	-	mak31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.837444961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789271	2540673	2543624	277198	280038	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC4D7.06c	mug80	SPAC4D7.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.667687528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789272	2540673	2542617	277198	279071	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC13A11.01c	mug80	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.003480672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789273	2540673	2539033	277198	275606	SPBC1D7.03	SPCC1450.07c	mug80	dao1	-	SPCC1450.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.748379899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789274	2540673	2542571	277198	279027	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC589.02c	mug80	med13	-	spTrap240|srb9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983869907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789275	2539891	2543308	276437	279732	SPBC1347.08c	SPAC694.04c	SPBC1347.08c	SPAC694.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.418067899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789276	2539891	2539381	276437	275947	SPBC1347.08c	SPCC1739.10	SPBC1347.08c	mug33	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816530653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789277	2539891	2539310	276437	275877	SPBC1347.08c	SPCC285.17	SPBC1347.08c	spp27	-	uaf30	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147002923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789278	2539891	2540338	276437	276867	SPBC1347.08c	SPBC2G2.13c	SPBC1347.08c	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.319346931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789279	2539891	2540194	276437	276727	SPBC1347.08c	SPBC1709.09	SPBC1347.08c	rrf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990045067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789280	2539891	2542710	276437	279163	SPBC1347.08c	SPAC750.08c	SPBC1347.08c	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503749139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789281	2539891	2539213	276437	275783	SPBC1347.08c	SPCC285.10c	SPBC1347.08c	SPCC285.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807326951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789282	2539891	2539354	276437	275920	SPBC1347.08c	SPCC4F11.03c	SPBC1347.08c	SPCC4F11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503442131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789283	2539891	2539239	276437	275809	SPBC1347.08c	SPCC1020.10	SPBC1347.08c	oca2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987919545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789284	2539891	2543277	276437	279705	SPBC1347.08c	SPAC1002.03c	SPBC1347.08c	gls2	-	gls2alpha	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09227521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789285	2540765	2543317	277285	279741	SPBC1D7.01	SPAC823.14	pfd1	ptf1	SPBC1D7.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865194701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789286	2540765	2542585	277285	279040	SPBC1D7.01	SPAC31A2.13c	pfd1	sft1	SPBC1D7.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.909363946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789287	2540765	2542701	277285	279154	SPBC1D7.01	SPAC26H5.05	pfd1	mga2	SPBC1D7.01	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.271766097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789288	2540765	2542273	277285	278742	SPBC1D7.01	SPAC17H9.13c	pfd1	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC1D7.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.038934626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789289	2540765	2541500	277285	278002	SPBC1D7.01	SPAC227.18	pfd1	lys3	SPBC1D7.01	SPAC2F7.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.978282641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789290	2540765	2542848	277285	279294	SPBC1D7.01	SPAC9G1.03c	pfd1	rpl3001	SPBC1D7.01	rpl30|rpl30-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712467438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789291	2540765	2540692	277285	277217	SPBC1D7.01	SPBC800.07c	pfd1	tsf1	SPBC1D7.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.772706729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789292	2540765	2541026	277285	277541	SPBC1D7.01	SPBC337.09	pfd1	erg28	SPBC1D7.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.502926362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789293	2540765	2541323	277285	277835	SPBC1D7.01	SPBP35G2.14	pfd1	SPBP35G2.14	SPBC1D7.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779906039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789294	2540765	2539792	277285	276342	SPBC1D7.01	SPBC1271.14	pfd1	SPBC1271.14	SPBC1D7.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.227283129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789295	2540765	2541926	277285	278414	SPBC1D7.01	SPAC222.14c	pfd1	SPAC222.14c	SPBC1D7.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639054958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789296	2540765	2540964	277285	277480	SPBC1D7.01	SPBC365.16	pfd1	SPBC365.16	SPBC1D7.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.346543605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789297	2540765	2542177	277285	278652	SPBC1D7.01	SPAC17H9.08	pfd1	SPAC17H9.08	SPBC1D7.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.123143475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789298	2540765	2543593	277285	280008	SPBC1D7.01	SPAC4G9.10	pfd1	arg3	SPBC1D7.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.977945779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789299	2540765	2541183	277285	277697	SPBC1D7.01	SPBC725.14	pfd1	arg6	SPBC1D7.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.571222626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789300	2540765	2539815	277285	276365	SPBC1D7.01	SPBC1105.02c	pfd1	lys4	SPBC1D7.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.146450231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789301	2540765	2540394	277285	276922	SPBC1D7.01	SPBC2D10.09	pfd1	snr1	SPBC1D7.01	SPBC2D10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.438863682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789302	2540765	2542867	277285	279312	SPBC1D7.01	SPAC343.16	pfd1	lys2	SPBC1D7.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.291148662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789303	2540765	2540990	277285	277506	SPBC1D7.01	SPBC36B7.06c	pfd1	mug20	SPBC1D7.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.817730103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789304	2540765	2542720	277285	279171	SPBC1D7.01	SPAC25G10.05c	pfd1	his1	SPBC1D7.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318176876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789305	2540765	2542597	277285	279051	SPBC1D7.01	SPAP8A3.07c	pfd1	SPAP8A3.07c	SPBC1D7.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.876527298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789306	2540765	2541186	277285	277700	SPBC1D7.01	SPBC725.01	pfd1	SPBC725.01	SPBC1D7.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.917051794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789307	2540765	2541488	277285	277990	SPBC1D7.01	SPAC227.17c	pfd1	SPAC227.17c	SPBC1D7.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.486946966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789308	2540765	2539605	277285	276163	SPBC1D7.01	SPBC1105.13c	pfd1	SPBC1105.13c	SPBC1D7.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511263389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789309	2540765	2542806	277285	279254	SPBC1D7.01	SPAC1610.01	pfd1	saf5	SPBC1D7.01	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387959589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789310	2540765	2543391	277285	279813	SPBC1D7.01	SPAC4G9.09c	pfd1	arg11	SPBC1D7.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.683882567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789311	2540765	2541531	277285	278031	SPBC1D7.01	SPAC25A8.01c	pfd1	fft3	SPBC1D7.01	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.335148724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789312	2540765	2542418	277285	278881	SPBC1D7.01	SPAC1805.07c	pfd1	dad2	SPBC1D7.01	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64702647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789313	2540765	2542250	277285	278720	SPBC1D7.01	SPAC17D4.03c	pfd1	cis4	SPBC1D7.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864115723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789314	2540765	2539205	277285	275775	SPBC1D7.01	SPCC4B3.15	pfd1	mid1	SPBC1D7.01	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711836028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789315	2540765	2538840	277285	275421	SPBC1D7.01	SPCC736.07c	pfd1	SPCC736.07c	SPBC1D7.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.774257932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789316	2540765	2542175	277285	278650	SPBC1D7.01	SPAC1F3.02c	pfd1	mkh1	SPBC1D7.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.990381512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789317	2540765	2541050	277285	277565	SPBC1D7.01	SPBC428.05c	pfd1	arg12	SPBC1D7.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.776005323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789318	2540765	2543372	277285	279794	SPBC1D7.01	SPAPB1A10.09	pfd1	ase1	SPBC1D7.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.191552489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789319	2540765	2542609	277285	279063	SPBC1D7.01	SPAC31G5.04	pfd1	lys12	SPBC1D7.01	SPAC31G5.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.985024812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789320	2539926	2542378	276470	278842	SPBC14F5.13c	SPAC1805.04	pho8	nup132	SPBC14F5.13c	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.279771322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789321	2539926	2541580	276470	278077	SPBC14F5.13c	SPAC1687.05	pho8	pli1	SPBC14F5.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702053841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789322	2539926	2539310	276470	275877	SPBC14F5.13c	SPCC285.17	pho8	spp27	SPBC14F5.13c	uaf30	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866501843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789323	2539926	2542268	276470	278737	SPBC14F5.13c	SPAC17A5.07c	pho8	ulp2	SPBC14F5.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.437879742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789324	2539926	2542710	276470	279163	SPBC14F5.13c	SPAC750.08c	pho8	SPAC750.08c	SPBC14F5.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.94128459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789325	2539926	2539239	276470	275809	SPBC14F5.13c	SPCC1020.10	pho8	oca2	SPBC14F5.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.343452809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789326	2539926	2540927	276470	277443	SPBC14F5.13c	SPBC365.06	pho8	pmt3	SPBC14F5.13c	smt3|ubl2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.024907315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789327	2539926	2542943	276470	279384	SPBC14F5.13c	SPBC1348.03	pho8	SPBC1348.03	SPBC14F5.13c	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639376425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789328	2540565	2538993	277092	275567	SPBC1D7.04	SPCC162.12	mlo3	tco89	-	SPCC1753.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.268208539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789329	2540565	2542273	277092	278742	SPBC1D7.04	SPAC17H9.13c	mlo3	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.289712784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789330	2540565	2542816	277092	279263	SPBC1D7.04	SPAC4G8.11c	mlo3	atp10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.824636366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789331	2540565	2540692	277092	277217	SPBC1D7.04	SPBC800.07c	mlo3	tsf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256724475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789332	2540565	2539792	277092	276342	SPBC1D7.04	SPBC1271.14	mlo3	SPBC1271.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.954859979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789333	2540565	2540964	277092	277480	SPBC1D7.04	SPBC365.16	mlo3	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769921573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789334	2540565	2543593	277092	280008	SPBC1D7.04	SPAC4G9.10	mlo3	arg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.566645585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789335	2540565	2543638	277092	280052	SPBC1D7.04	SPAC3H8.09c	mlo3	nab3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.056101128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789336	2540565	2541183	277092	277697	SPBC1D7.04	SPBC725.14	mlo3	arg6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.890573932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789337	2540565	2539603	277092	276161	SPBC1D7.04	SPBC1289.06c	mlo3	ppr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.50039722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789338	2540565	2539815	277092	276365	SPBC1D7.04	SPBC1105.02c	mlo3	lys4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.766043872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789339	2540565	2542867	277092	279312	SPBC1D7.04	SPAC343.16	mlo3	lys2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.064271905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789340	2540565	2538884	277092	275462	SPBC1D7.04	SPCC1393.08	mlo3	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.311606636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789341	2540565	3361520	277092	280596	SPBC1D7.04	SPAC1610.02c	mlo3	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.736078089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789342	2540565	2543391	277092	279813	SPBC1D7.04	SPAC4G9.09c	mlo3	arg11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.637600905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789343	2540565	2542883	277092	279328	SPBC1D7.04	SPAC1486.04c	mlo3	alm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.964013242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789344	2540565	2541675	277092	278171	SPBC1D7.04	SPAC22F8.12c	mlo3	shf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873888523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789345	2540565	2541050	277092	277565	SPBC1D7.04	SPBC428.05c	mlo3	arg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.67115652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789346	2540612	2539293	277138	275861	SPBC1D7.05	SPCC553.08c	byr2	ria1	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	SPCC553.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.250048768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789347	2540612	3361520	277138	280596	SPBC1D7.05	SPAC1610.02c	byr2	SPAC1610.02c	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.567353028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789348	2540612	2543275	277138	279703	SPBC1D7.05	SPAC1002.05c	byr2	jmj2	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	kdm5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869868879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789349	2540612	2540671	277138	277196	SPBC1D7.05	SPBC215.10	byr2	SPBC215.10	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923854051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789350	2540558	2539147	277085	275719	SPBC2D10.17	SPCC622.12c	clr1	gdh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.050274046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789351	2540558	2538961	277085	275535	SPBC2D10.17	SPCC285.14	clr1	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.356271499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789352	2540558	2540105	277085	276642	SPBC2D10.17	SPBC106.04	clr1	ada1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.45672468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789353	2540558	2543637	277085	280051	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC3H8.02	clr1	csr102	-	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.845831696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789354	2540558	2541015	277085	277530	SPBC2D10.17	SPBC409.08	clr1	SPBC409.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.04546114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789355	2540558	2543064	277085	279497	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC3G6.01	clr1	hrp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.406337677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789356	2540558	2539582	277085	276141	SPBC2D10.17	SPCC594.07c	clr1	bqt3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.774597641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789357	2540558	2540524	277085	277052	SPBC2D10.17	SPBC21B10.08c	clr1	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44342271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789358	2540558	2539202	277085	275773	SPBC2D10.17	SPCC162.10	clr1	ppk33	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992460922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789359	2540558	2542798	277085	279246	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC13C5.06c	clr1	mug121	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.865842274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789360	2540558	2539944	277085	276488	SPBC2D10.17	SPBC1198.06c	clr1	SPBC1198.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.062876496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789361	2540558	5802945	277085	858083	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC19G12.16c	clr1	adg2	-	SPAC23A1.01c|mug46	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.068520012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789362	2540558	2540686	277085	277211	SPBC2D10.17	SPBC21D10.10	clr1	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638605851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789363	2540558	2538806	277085	275387	SPBC2D10.17	SPCC1840.09	clr1	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.563824648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789364	2540558	2540043	277085	276581	SPBC2D10.17	SPBC1198.12	clr1	mfr1	-	SPBC660.02|fzr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386874196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789365	2540558	2539332	277085	275898	SPBC2D10.17	SPCPB1C11.01	clr1	amt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.949957147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789366	2540558	2541200	277085	277714	SPBC2D10.17	SPBC8D2.03c	clr1	hhf2	-	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.552198612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789367	2540558	2542677	277085	279130	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC26F1.10c	clr1	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.682705962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789368	2540558	2542641	277085	279095	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC24C9.15c	clr1	spn5	-	mde9|meu28	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325347392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789369	2540558	2539463	277085	276026	SPBC2D10.17	SPCC550.11	clr1	SPCC550.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.359266416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789370	2540558	2539235	277085	275805	SPBC2D10.17	SPCC1682.15	clr1	mug122	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.60777113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789371	2540558	2540029	277085	276573	SPBC2D10.17	SPBC16A3.01	clr1	spn3	-	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.843481938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789372	2540558	2542724	277085	279175	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC767.01c	clr1	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.250123163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789373	2540558	2539334	277085	275900	SPBC2D10.17	SPCC285.05	clr1	SPCC285.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.066937326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789374	2540558	2541026	277085	277541	SPBC2D10.17	SPBC337.09	clr1	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.738261955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789375	2540558	2543048	277085	279483	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC3F10.02c	clr1	trk1	-	sptrk	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.315644415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789376	2540558	2541323	277085	277835	SPBC2D10.17	SPBP35G2.14	clr1	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.40032182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789377	2540558	2542318	277085	278784	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC16C9.05	clr1	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.614980395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789378	2540558	2541527	277085	278027	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC31A2.09c	clr1	apm4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.405310932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789379	2540558	2542220	277085	278694	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC1A6.03c	clr1	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.692509124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789380	2540558	2543261	277085	279689	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC1002.18	clr1	urg3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205303397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789381	2540558	2543551	277085	279968	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC4G8.06c	clr1	trm12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.355505214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789382	2540558	2538698	277085	275283	SPBC2D10.17	SPCC1442.02	clr1	SPCC1442.02	-	SPCC1450.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.439095494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789383	2540558	2541522	277085	278023	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC23E2.01	clr1	fep1	-	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.327425724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789384	2540558	2538927	277085	275503	SPBC2D10.17	SPCC1795.09	clr1	yps1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.628263762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789385	2540558	2541663	277085	278159	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC22G7.08	clr1	ppk8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.133909029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789386	2540558	2538972	277085	275546	SPBC2D10.17	SPCC1739.15	clr1	wtf21	-	wtf3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.881370217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789387	2540558	2539381	277085	275947	SPBC2D10.17	SPCC1739.10	clr1	mug33	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.629634504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789388	2540558	2539310	277085	275877	SPBC2D10.17	SPCC285.17	clr1	spp27	-	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.558934617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789389	2540558	2542239	277085	278711	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC18G6.02c	clr1	chp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.17894004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789390	2540558	2541384	277085	277895	SPBC2D10.17	SPBP8B7.26	clr1	SPBP8B7.26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.829639621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789391	2540558	2539237	277085	275807	SPBC2D10.17	SPCC24B10.13	clr1	skb5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.352178403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789392	2540558	2539051	277085	275624	SPBC2D10.17	SPCC1183.11	clr1	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.002705114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789393	2540558	2541160	277085	277675	SPBC2D10.17	SPBC725.09c	clr1	hob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.554183155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789394	2540558	2538706	277085	275290	SPBC2D10.17	SPCC338.08	clr1	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.553653047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789395	2540558	2540363	277085	276892	SPBC2D10.17	SPBC2F12.09c	clr1	atf21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.497327485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789396	2540558	2539219	277085	275789	SPBC2D10.17	SPCC1795.01c	clr1	mad3	-	SPCC895.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389839027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789397	2540558	2542921	277085	279362	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC1093.01	clr1	ppr5	-	SPAC12B10.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.685606495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789398	2540558	2541496	277085	277998	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC23D3.09	clr1	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.590705087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789399	2540558	2542357	277085	278822	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC1782.07	clr1	qcr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.002132251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789400	2540558	2540086	277085	276624	SPBC2D10.17	SPBC16H5.12c	clr1	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.178548396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789401	2540558	2542857	277085	279303	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC144.06	clr1	apl5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.194633838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789402	2540558	2543250	277085	279678	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC3G9.15c	clr1	fcf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63903814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789403	2540558	2538837	277085	275418	SPBC2D10.17	SPCC4B3.03c	clr1	SPCC4B3.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.785759271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789404	2540558	2541720	277085	278214	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC23H3.13c	clr1	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.624440292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789405	2540558	2541903	277085	278393	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC22F8.05	clr1	SPAC22F8.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.194720964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789406	2540558	2541900	277085	278390	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC23H4.17c	clr1	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.8368703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789407	2540558	2539424	277085	275989	SPBC2D10.17	SPCC622.19	clr1	jmj4	-	mug149	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.893588064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789408	2540558	2540184	277085	276717	SPBC2D10.17	SPBC106.12c	clr1	SPBC106.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.557908569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789409	2540558	2541296	277085	277808	SPBC2D10.17	SPBP8B7.06	clr1	rpp201	-	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.474549319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789410	2540558	2540357	277085	276886	SPBC2D10.17	SPBC2F12.05c	clr1	SPBC2F12.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.648089629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789411	2540558	2538884	277085	275462	SPBC2D10.17	SPCC1393.08	clr1	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.290093551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789412	2540558	2542781	277085	279230	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC57A10.12c	clr1	ura3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.697193927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789413	2540558	2540643	277085	277168	SPBC2D10.17	SPBC19G7.06	clr1	mbx1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.185668806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789414	2540558	2540001	277085	276545	SPBC2D10.17	SPBC1289.13c	clr1	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.070865002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789415	2540558	2541786	277085	278278	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC22F3.08c	clr1	rok1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.394850493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789416	2540558	2539137	277085	275709	SPBC2D10.17	SPCC1682.08c	clr1	mcp2	-	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.510531098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789417	2540558	2542881	277085	279326	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC13F5.03c	clr1	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380143629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789418	2540558	2539925	277085	276469	SPBC2D10.17	SPBC16H5.13	clr1	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.743182051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789419	2540558	2540648	277085	277173	SPBC2D10.17	SPBC1921.05	clr1	ape2	-	ape1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517591997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789420	2540558	2540800	277085	277319	SPBC2D10.17	SPBC409.20c	clr1	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.651996916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789421	2540558	2538717	277085	275301	SPBC2D10.17	SPCC1235.02	clr1	bio2	-	SPCC320.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.198036953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789422	2540558	2542934	277085	279375	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC10F6.07c	clr1	mug94	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453991107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789423	2540558	2540516	277085	277044	SPBC2D10.17	SPBC21C3.01c	clr1	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.333089098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789424	2540558	2539205	277085	275775	SPBC2D10.17	SPCC4B3.15	clr1	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.360784368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789425	2540558	2540551	277085	277078	SPBC2D10.17	SPBC23E6.01c	clr1	cxr1	-	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.816043983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789426	2540558	2539169	277085	275740	SPBC2D10.17	SPCC1235.11	clr1	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.586913954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789427	2540558	2541238	277085	277752	SPBC2D10.17	SPBC8E4.05c	clr1	SPBC8E4.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.945722583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789428	2540558	2542716	277085	279169	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC25H1.07	clr1	emc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81411596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789429	2540558	2543220	277085	279648	SPBC2D10.17	SPAPB21F2.02	clr1	SPAPB21F2.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.136215893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789430	2540558	2541478	277085	277980	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC2F7.17	clr1	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867065937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789431	2540558	2542700	277085	279153	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC26H5.08c	clr1	bgl2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391249899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789432	2540558	2541576	277085	278073	SPBC2D10.17	SPBC1348.02	clr1	SPBC1348.02	-	SPAC1348.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.330948404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789433	2540558	2540208	277085	276741	SPBC2D10.17	SPBC9B6.03	clr1	SPBC9B6.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.853827217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789434	2540558	2542617	277085	279071	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC13A11.01c	clr1	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.71504544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789435	2540558	2541062	277085	277577	SPBC2D10.17	SPBC660.11	clr1	tcg1	-	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.300709725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789436	2540558	2540734	277085	277257	SPBC2D10.17	SPBC19G7.09	clr1	ulp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.548010043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789437	2541101	2541885	277616	278375	SPBC609.02	SPAC22H10.03c	ptn1	kap114	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320918039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789438	2541101	2541806	277616	278297	SPBC609.02	SPAC4G8.13c	ptn1	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.577431406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789439	2541101	2543387	277616	279809	SPBC609.02	SPAPB1E7.02c	ptn1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.936540021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789440	2540492	2540338	277020	276867	SPBC2D10.13	SPBC2G2.13c	est1	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.694483986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789441	2540492	2541488	277020	277990	SPBC2D10.13	SPAC227.17c	est1	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.97388433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789442	2540492	2540064	277020	276602	SPBC2D10.13	SPBC1718.02	est1	hop1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.337340734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789443	2541452	2539898	277957	276444	SPAC7D4.05	SPBC12D12.07c	SPAC7D4.05	trx2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.633421119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789444	2541452	2540886	277957	277403	SPAC7D4.05	SPBC4F6.10	SPAC7D4.05	vps901	-	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32409861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789445	2541452	2543387	277957	279809	SPAC7D4.05	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC7D4.05	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325022043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789446	2540352	2542862	276881	279308	SPBC215.03c	SPAC140.03	csn1	arb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.438235826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789447	2540352	2540060	276881	276598	SPBC215.03c	SPBC106.01	csn1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.095466716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789448	2540352	2542598	276881	279052	SPBC215.03c	SPAC6G10.08	csn1	idp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699273391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789449	2540352	2540885	276881	277402	SPBC215.03c	SPBC660.14	csn1	mik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.169534446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789450	2540352	2542518	276881	278976	SPBC215.03c	SPAC1B3.16c	csn1	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.983974787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789451	2540352	2541512	276881	278013	SPBC215.03c	SPAC11E3.08c	csn1	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.04885972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789452	2540352	2542372	276881	278836	SPBC215.03c	SPAC1F3.03	csn1	SPAC1F3.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.264326376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789453	2540352	2539452	276881	276015	SPBC215.03c	SPCC70.03c	csn1	SPCC70.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578595935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789454	2540352	2538977	276881	275551	SPBC215.03c	SPCC1020.06c	csn1	tal1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.102664175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789455	2540352	2542671	276881	279124	SPBC215.03c	SPAC824.09c	csn1	SPAC824.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.482432584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789456	2540352	2542378	276881	278842	SPBC215.03c	SPAC1805.04	csn1	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.01821233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789457	2540352	2540528	276881	277056	SPBC215.03c	SPBC18H10.04c	csn1	sce3	-	tif48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927354914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789458	2540352	2543339	276881	279762	SPBC215.03c	SPAC630.13c	csn1	tsc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.786538749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789459	2540352	2542502	276881	278960	SPBC215.03c	SPAC139.06	csn1	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322650472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789460	2540352	2538922	276881	275499	SPBC215.03c	SPCC16C4.10	csn1	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.296718994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789461	2540352	2542103	276881	278579	SPBC215.03c	SPAC31G5.11	csn1	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571825628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789462	2540352	2539226	276881	275796	SPBC215.03c	SPCC16C4.20c	csn1	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.475264668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789463	2540352	2539443	276881	276006	SPBC215.03c	SPCC736.02	csn1	SPCC736.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444933239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789464	2540352	2538775	276881	275357	SPBC215.03c	SPCC23B6.05c	csn1	ssb3	-	rpa3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.534429561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789465	2540352	2539510	276881	276072	SPBC215.03c	SPCC4G3.04c	csn1	coq5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153370204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789466	2540352	2542696	276881	279149	SPBC215.03c	SPAC29B12.03	csn1	spd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.789060446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789467	2540352	2543453	276881	279873	SPBC215.03c	SPAC3G9.03	csn1	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.003825485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789468	2540352	2542012	276881	278495	SPBC215.03c	SPAC23C11.02c	csn1	rps23	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.687665573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789469	2540352	2540727	276881	277250	SPBC215.03c	SPBC1921.03c	csn1	mex67	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444072719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789470	2540352	2542318	276881	278784	SPBC215.03c	SPAC16C9.05	csn1	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.04690913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789471	2540352	2541597	276881	278094	SPBC215.03c	SPAC29E6.09	csn1	SPAC29E6.09	-	SPAC30.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.253378091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789472	2540352	2541643	276881	278139	SPBC215.03c	SPAC14C4.13	csn1	rad17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.327533601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789473	2540352	2543563	276881	279979	SPBC215.03c	SPAC664.02c	csn1	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.330546122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789474	2540352	2543584	276881	279999	SPBC215.03c	SPAPB1E7.11c	csn1	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.477961687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789475	2540352	2543078	276881	279511	SPBC215.03c	SPAC31A2.15c	csn1	dcc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634652058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789476	2540352	2538906	276881	275483	SPBC215.03c	SPCC1259.03	csn1	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.442067174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789477	2540352	2539092	276881	275664	SPBC215.03c	SPCC1259.08	csn1	SPCC1259.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.050151396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789478	2540352	2542253	276881	278723	SPBC215.03c	SPAC17H9.04c	csn1	SPAC17H9.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570265832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789479	2540352	2541926	276881	278414	SPBC215.03c	SPAC222.14c	csn1	SPAC222.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.901268712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789480	2540352	2542558	276881	279014	SPBC215.03c	SPAC1952.07	csn1	rad1	-	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.871022431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789481	2540352	2542331	276881	278797	SPBC215.03c	SPAC1834.05	csn1	alg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515196452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789482	2540352	2542239	276881	278711	SPBC215.03c	SPAC18G6.02c	csn1	chp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.202464821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789483	2540352	2542036	276881	278518	SPBC215.03c	SPAC23A1.19c	csn1	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392232195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789484	2540352	2542311	276881	278777	SPBC215.03c	SPAC16A10.05c	csn1	dad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.573167819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789485	2540352	2543514	276881	279932	SPBC215.03c	SPAC4D7.03	csn1	pop2	-	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.265111113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789486	2540352	2542596	276881	279050	SPBC215.03c	SPAC1B3.17	csn1	clr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.368794998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789487	2540352	2540797	276881	277316	SPBC215.03c	SPBC18H10.11c	csn1	ppr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.275347212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789488	2540352	2541160	276881	277675	SPBC215.03c	SPBC725.09c	csn1	hob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.81265918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789489	2540352	2540922	276881	277438	SPBC215.03c	SPBC36.10	csn1	SPBC36.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.977776985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789490	2540352	2538706	276881	275290	SPBC215.03c	SPCC338.08	csn1	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.568820814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789491	2540352	2541543	276881	278043	SPBC215.03c	SPAC5H10.04	csn1	SPAC5H10.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.449046442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789492	2540352	2539733	276881	276285	SPBC215.03c	SPBC16E9.12c	csn1	pab2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200055941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789493	2540352	2540673	276881	277198	SPBC215.03c	SPBC1D7.03	csn1	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.061528328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789494	2540352	2541496	276881	277998	SPBC215.03c	SPAC23D3.09	csn1	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.691237365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789495	2540352	2543396	276881	279818	SPBC215.03c	SPAC4D7.11	csn1	dsc4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778237094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789496	2540352	2540326	276881	276856	SPBC215.03c	SPBC2G5.06c	csn1	hmt2	-	cad1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099107381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789497	2540352	3361269	276881	280345	SPBC215.03c	SPBC31A8.01c	csn1	rtn1	-	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439774927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789498	2540352	2542126	276881	278602	SPBC215.03c	SPAC1B3.05	csn1	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.475054015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789499	2540352	2540194	276881	276727	SPBC215.03c	SPBC1709.09	csn1	rrf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926853518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789500	2540352	2540997	276881	277513	SPBC215.03c	SPBC3H7.06c	csn1	pof9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.578562521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789501	2540352	2543244	276881	279672	SPBC215.03c	SPAC6B12.06c	csn1	rrg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.910758145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789502	2540352	2541828	276881	278319	SPBC215.03c	SPAC22H12.05c	csn1	fsc1	-	SPAC22H12.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868456482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789503	2540352	2541542	276881	278042	SPBC215.03c	SPAC4G9.02	csn1	rnh201	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.801659588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789504	2540352	2543357	276881	279779	SPBC215.03c	SPAC688.12c	csn1	SPAC688.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873695237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789505	2540352	2541900	276881	278390	SPBC215.03c	SPAC23H4.17c	csn1	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.124451017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789506	2540352	2542519	276881	278977	SPBC215.03c	SPAC19G12.08	csn1	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.11914441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789507	2540352	2539481	276881	276044	SPBC215.03c	SPCC622.16c	csn1	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.139409194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789508	2540352	2541009	276881	277524	SPBC215.03c	SPBC428.04	csn1	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.678788573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789509	2540352	2543443	276881	279863	SPBC215.03c	SPAC3H1.12c	csn1	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.823531096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789510	2540352	2541536	276881	278036	SPBC215.03c	SPAC1071.02	csn1	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.111943129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789511	2540352	2541708	276881	278203	SPBC215.03c	SPAC31A2.02	csn1	trm112	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385942739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789512	2540352	2542597	276881	279051	SPBC215.03c	SPAP8A3.07c	csn1	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933996629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789513	2540352	2541186	276881	277700	SPBC215.03c	SPBC725.01	csn1	SPBC725.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575380151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789514	2540352	2540882	276881	277399	SPBC215.03c	SPBC4F6.08c	csn1	mrpl39	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.271758748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789515	2540352	2539213	276881	275783	SPBC215.03c	SPCC285.10c	csn1	SPCC285.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818100093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789516	2540352	2542255	276881	278725	SPBC215.03c	SPAC57A7.08	csn1	pzh1	-	phz1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043035586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789517	2540352	2538848	276881	275429	SPBC215.03c	SPCC613.12c	csn1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712098523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789518	2540352	2541762	276881	278256	SPBC215.03c	SPAC139.01c	csn1	SPAC139.01c	-	SPAC955.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.843580338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789519	2540352	2541713	276881	278208	SPBC215.03c	SPAC3A12.12	csn1	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.39847631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789520	2540352	2540821	276881	277339	SPBC215.03c	SPBC800.03	csn1	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.833521284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789521	2540352	2539932	276881	276476	SPBC215.03c	SPBC13E7.07	csn1	SPBC13E7.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453082024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789522	2540352	2540910	276881	277426	SPBC215.03c	SPBC577.02	csn1	rpl3801	-	rpl38-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581766633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789523	2540352	2542806	276881	279254	SPBC215.03c	SPAC1610.01	csn1	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819756122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789524	2540352	2539160	276881	275732	SPBC215.03c	SPCC18.17c	csn1	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.691245243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789525	2540352	2539499	276881	276062	SPBC215.03c	SPCC622.08c	csn1	hta1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.752424026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789526	2540352	2543628	276881	280042	SPBC215.03c	SPAC3H8.10	csn1	spo20	-	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516080731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789527	2540352	2541909	276881	278399	SPBC215.03c	SPAC227.01c	csn1	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328228066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789528	2540352	2540498	276881	277026	SPBC215.03c	SPBC27.02c	csn1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511361491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789529	2540352	2543304	276881	279728	SPBC215.03c	SPAC6B12.12	csn1	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.315658966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789530	2540352	2538717	276881	275301	SPBC215.03c	SPCC1235.02	csn1	bio2	-	SPCC320.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319337045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789531	2540352	2539159	276881	275731	SPBC215.03c	SPCC1235.01	csn1	SPCC1235.01	-	SPCC320.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.561494088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789532	2540352	2542113	276881	278589	SPBC215.03c	SPAC1B3.11c	csn1	ypt4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328591803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789533	2540352	2541617	276881	278114	SPBC215.03c	SPAC27D7.04	csn1	omt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635252535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789534	2540352	2540733	276881	277256	SPBC215.03c	SPBC4.01	csn1	dni2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389157996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789535	2540352	2541100	276881	277615	SPBC215.03c	SPBC651.04	csn1	SPBC651.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.395255615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789536	2540352	2541432	276881	277937	SPBC215.03c	SPAC1F5.05c	csn1	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.467196463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789537	2540352	2540115	276881	276652	SPBC215.03c	SPBC1778.02	csn1	rap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.539348456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789538	2540352	2541531	276881	278031	SPBC215.03c	SPAC25A8.01c	csn1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.016615633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789539	2540352	2540346	276881	276875	SPBC215.03c	SPBC2F12.03c	csn1	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.085178983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789540	2540352	2540677	276881	277202	SPBC215.03c	SPBC21B10.03c	csn1	ath1	-	SPBC21B10.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.457338913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789541	2540352	2539668	276881	276223	SPBC215.03c	SPBC11B10.10c	csn1	pht1	-	pi001	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.404551704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789542	2540352	2540927	276881	277443	SPBC215.03c	SPBC365.06	csn1	pmt3	-	smt3|ubl2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.046917987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789543	2540352	2543633	276881	280047	SPBC215.03c	SPAC3H8.05c	csn1	mms1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.565804398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789544	2540352	2539205	276881	275775	SPBC215.03c	SPCC4B3.15	csn1	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.61505546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789545	2540352	2542904	276881	279348	SPBC215.03c	SPAC144.11	csn1	rps1102	-	rps11|rps11-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.561566462	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789546	2540352	2539189	276881	275760	SPBC215.03c	SPCC1682.16	csn1	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.265544137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789547	2540352	2543337	276881	279760	SPBC215.03c	SPAC959.08	csn1	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.985713425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789548	2540352	2539700	276881	276253	SPBC215.03c	SPBC1685.15c	csn1	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.307282304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789549	2540352	2543384	276881	279806	SPBC215.03c	SPAC637.06	csn1	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389855478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789550	2540352	2541806	276881	278297	SPBC215.03c	SPAC4G8.13c	csn1	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.4787553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789551	2540352	2543387	276881	279809	SPBC215.03c	SPAPB1E7.02c	csn1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.80549752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789552	2540352	2542424	276881	278886	SPBC215.03c	SPAC1805.14	csn1	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.323916682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789553	2540352	2543372	276881	279794	SPBC215.03c	SPAPB1A10.09	csn1	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.907546929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789554	2540352	2543646	276881	280060	SPBC215.03c	SPAC821.07c	csn1	moc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.633065515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789555	2540352	2542908	276881	279352	SPBC215.03c	SPAC13G7.03	csn1	upf3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258284076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789556	2542128	2539201	278604	275772	SPAC821.10c	SPCC188.09c	sod1	pfl4	-	SPCC188.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.345016903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789557	2542128	2541313	278604	277825	SPAC821.10c	SPBP26C9.02c	sod1	car1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870770881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789558	2542128	2541776	278604	278270	SPAC821.10c	SPAC23H3.05c	sod1	swd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.513109082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789559	2542128	2540836	278604	277354	SPAC821.10c	SPBC18H10.19	sod1	vps38	-	atg14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930623612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789560	2542128	2539317	278604	275883	SPAC821.10c	SPCC16A11.08	sod1	atg20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932035203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789561	2542128	2541053	278604	277568	SPAC821.10c	SPBC56F2.10c	sod1	alg5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979873793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789562	2542128	2541628	278604	278124	SPAC821.10c	SPAC110.02	sod1	pds5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.661437392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789563	2542128	2539555	278604	276116	SPAC821.10c	SPCC4B3.08	sod1	lsg1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810840796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789564	2542128	2540333	278604	276863	SPAC821.10c	SPBC21B10.07	sod1	SPBC21B10.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048044342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789565	2542128	2538981	278604	275555	SPAC821.10c	SPCC330.06c	sod1	pmp20	-	SPCC330.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262201035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789566	2542128	2540649	278604	277174	SPAC821.10c	SPBC19F8.08	sod1	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043100179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789567	2539154	2542273	275726	278742	SPCC11E10.07c	SPAC17H9.13c	SPCC11E10.07c	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.385226577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789568	2539154	2542689	275726	279142	SPCC11E10.07c	SPAC29B12.04	SPCC11E10.07c	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.413856841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789569	2539154	2539937	275726	276481	SPCC11E10.07c	SPBC1539.08	SPCC11E10.07c	arf6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.204107876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789570	2539154	2543020	275726	279456	SPCC11E10.07c	SPAC10F6.13c	SPCC11E10.07c	SPAC10F6.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.290245931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789571	2539154	2539952	275726	276496	SPCC11E10.07c	SPBC1709.14	SPCC11E10.07c	SPBC1709.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874558592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789572	2539154	2541464	275726	277966	SPCC11E10.07c	SPAC222.08c	SPCC11E10.07c	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.42255395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789573	2539154	2541186	275726	277700	SPCC11E10.07c	SPBC725.01	SPCC11E10.07c	SPBC725.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512845055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789574	2539154	2540946	275726	277462	SPCC11E10.07c	SPBC36.04	SPCC11E10.07c	cys11	-	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64312645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789575	2539154	2542680	275726	279133	SPCC11E10.07c	SPAC26F1.09	SPCC11E10.07c	gyp51	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935585939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789576	2542358	2539050	278823	275623	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC11E10.08	clp1	rik1	flp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.558081819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789577	2542358	2540060	278823	276598	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC106.01	clp1	mph1	flp1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.341340531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789578	2542358	2540913	278823	277429	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC56F2.08c	clp1	SPBC56F2.08c	flp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.273610766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789579	2542358	2540528	278823	277056	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC18H10.04c	clp1	sce3	flp1	tif48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.627785109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789580	2542358	2541345	278823	277856	SPAC1782.09c	SPBP35G2.07	clp1	ilv1	flp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392455237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789581	2542358	2541633	278823	278129	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC664.01c	clp1	swi6	flp1	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.132014552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789582	2542358	2538922	278823	275499	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC16C4.10	clp1	SPCC16C4.10	flp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.744890766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789583	2542358	2538806	278823	275387	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC1840.09	clp1	SPCC1840.09	flp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.918253834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789584	2542358	2539420	278823	275985	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC970.07c	clp1	raf2	flp1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.741547383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789585	2542358	2541013	278823	277528	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC3H7.13	clp1	far10	flp1	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.16802399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789586	2542358	2539970	278823	276514	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC1773.01	clp1	far8	flp1	SPBC1773.01|csc3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.809780563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789587	2542358	2542318	278823	278784	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC16C9.05	clp1	cph1	flp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.517295368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789588	2542358	2543108	278823	279540	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC3A12.13c	clp1	SPAC3A12.13c	flp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513772671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789589	2542358	2540825	278823	277343	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC428.08c	clp1	clr4	flp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.818198737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789590	2542358	2541021	278823	277536	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC3B8.10c	clp1	nem1	flp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.739811628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789591	2542358	2542239	278823	278711	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC18G6.02c	clp1	chp1	flp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.629095453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789592	2542358	2541249	278823	277763	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC947.01	clp1	alf1	flp1	SPBC947.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.300320285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789593	2542358	2543144	278823	279576	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC3F10.05c	clp1	mug113	flp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.165951903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789594	2542358	2539733	278823	276285	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC16E9.12c	clp1	pab2	flp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638187271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789595	2542358	2540396	278823	276924	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC31F10.12	clp1	tma20	flp1	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.345677868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789596	2542358	2540673	278823	277198	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC1D7.03	clp1	mug80	flp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.616443908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789597	2542358	2542971	278823	279410	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC105.02c	clp1	SPAC105.02c	flp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389474507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789598	2542358	2541889	278823	278379	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC2F7.03c	clp1	pom1	flp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.48979574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789599	2542358	2541929	278823	278417	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC23C4.12	clp1	hhp2	flp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.045176191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789600	2542358	2540326	278823	276856	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC2G5.06c	clp1	hmt2	flp1	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.999873608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789601	2542358	2539850	278823	276398	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC15D4.07c	clp1	atg9	flp1	apg9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036612704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789602	2542358	2542254	278823	278724	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC30D11.04c	clp1	nup124	flp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.705873942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789603	2542358	2542519	278823	278977	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC19G12.08	clp1	scs7	flp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.320324377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789604	2542358	2538824	278823	275405	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC1442.14c	clp1	hnt1	flp1	SPCC1442.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.518453324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789605	2542358	2543443	278823	279863	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC3H1.12c	clp1	snt2	flp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.159972682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789606	2542358	2540019	278823	276563	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC1685.01	clp1	pmp1	flp1	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.552445415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789607	2542358	2540342	278823	276871	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC2G2.01c	clp1	liz1	flp1	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769579452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789608	2542358	2538839	278823	275420	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC338.18	clp1	SPCC338.18	flp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873176104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789609	2542358	2538848	278823	275429	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC613.12c	clp1	raf1	flp1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.781941623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789610	2542358	2541713	278823	278208	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC3A12.12	clp1	atp11	flp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.622305526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789611	2542358	2542725	278823	279176	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC3A12.10	clp1	rpl2001	flp1	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699859386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789612	2542358	2541909	278823	278399	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC227.01c	clp1	erd1	flp1	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.826137962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789613	2542358	2540498	278823	277026	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC27.02c	clp1	ask1	flp1	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.681660914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789614	2542358	2543136	278823	279568	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC1348.07	clp1	SPBC1348.07	flp1	SPAC1348.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.618461988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789615	2542358	2541100	278823	277615	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC651.04	clp1	SPBC651.04	flp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.26945926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789616	2542358	2541531	278823	278031	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC25A8.01c	clp1	fft3	flp1	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.660541065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789617	2542358	2542418	278823	278881	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC1805.07c	clp1	dad2	flp1	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.243829159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789618	2542358	2539668	278823	276223	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC11B10.10c	clp1	pht1	flp1	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.460248659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789619	2542358	2542574	278823	279030	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC186.05c	clp1	SPAC186.05c	flp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815833562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789620	2542358	2539375	278823	275941	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC4G3.11	clp1	mug154	flp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.664839892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789621	2542358	2542716	278823	279169	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC25H1.07	clp1	emc1	flp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.19246243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789622	2542358	2539700	278823	276253	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC1685.15c	clp1	klp6	flp1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.059096784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789623	2542358	2541806	278823	278297	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC4G8.13c	clp1	prz1	flp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.324510288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789624	2542358	2543327	278823	279750	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC1D4.06c	clp1	csk1	flp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.993241569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789625	2542358	2542424	278823	278886	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC1805.14	clp1	SPAC1805.14	flp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.478317727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789626	2542358	2543372	278823	279794	SPAC1782.09c	SPAPB1A10.09	clp1	ase1	flp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.117066465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789627	2542358	2538947	278823	275521	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC1682.12c	clp1	ubp16	flp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.807909745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789628	2542358	2540787	278823	277306	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC1921.07c	clp1	sgf29	flp1	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.206319497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789629	2542358	2542208	278823	278683	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC17G8.08c	clp1	SPAC17G8.08c	flp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196346842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789630	2538800	2540060	275381	276598	SPCC1322.06	SPBC106.01	kap113	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.700420548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789631	2538800	2542701	275381	279154	SPCC1322.06	SPAC26H5.05	kap113	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569932656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789632	2538800	2540999	275381	277515	SPCC1322.06	SPBC4B4.04	kap113	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.749048435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789633	2538800	2539575	275381	276135	SPCC1322.06	SPCP20C8.02c	kap113	SPCP20C8.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645394298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789634	2538800	2540929	275381	277445	SPCC1322.06	SPBC354.03	kap113	swd3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987174329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789635	2538800	2540825	275381	277343	SPCC1322.06	SPBC428.08c	kap113	clr4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.880630875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789636	2538800	2542420	275381	278883	SPCC1322.06	SPAC19D5.03	kap113	cid1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864350502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789637	2538800	2540326	275381	276856	SPCC1322.06	SPBC2G5.06c	kap113	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.912176403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789638	2538800	2540394	275381	276922	SPCC1322.06	SPBC2D10.09	kap113	snr1	-	SPBC2D10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.615815149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789639	2538800	2541488	275381	277990	SPCC1322.06	SPAC227.17c	kap113	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844928222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789640	2538800	2538848	275381	275429	SPCC1322.06	SPCC613.12c	kap113	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.842996023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789641	2538800	3361520	275381	280596	SPCC1322.06	SPAC1610.02c	kap113	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.332377177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789642	2538800	2540498	275381	277026	SPCC1322.06	SPBC27.02c	kap113	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.818668799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789643	2538800	2540998	275381	277514	SPCC1322.06	SPBC3D6.05	kap113	ptp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.817716609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789644	2538800	2542418	275381	278881	SPCC1322.06	SPAC1805.07c	kap113	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.552271752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789645	2538800	2539375	275381	275941	SPCC1322.06	SPCC4G3.11	kap113	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.130787692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789646	2538800	2542119	275381	278595	SPCC1322.06	SPAC1834.08	kap113	mak1	-	phk3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.599806659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789647	2538800	2543277	275381	279705	SPCC1322.06	SPAC1002.03c	kap113	gls2	-	gls2alpha	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987298172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789648	2538800	2543372	275381	279794	SPCC1322.06	SPAPB1A10.09	kap113	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.259836059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789649	2539073	2540060	275645	276598	SPCC1322.02	SPBC106.01	pxd1	mph1	SPCC1322.02	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.122510244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789650	2539073	2542382	275645	278846	SPCC1322.02	SPAC6G10.06	pxd1	SPAC6G10.06	SPCC1322.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.260206547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789651	2539073	2543152	275645	279584	SPCC1322.02	SPAC869.03c	pxd1	SPAC869.03c	SPCC1322.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.255701591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789652	2539073	2542643	275645	279097	SPCC1322.02	SPAC2C4.07c	pxd1	dis32	SPCC1322.02	SPAC2C4.07c|dis3L2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.199221436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789653	2539073	2540863	275645	277380	SPCC1322.02	SPBC56F2.03	pxd1	SPBC56F2.03	SPCC1322.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706563672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789654	2539073	2541374	275645	277885	SPCC1322.02	SPBPB10D8.06c	pxd1	SPBPB10D8.06c	SPCC1322.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.493539384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789655	2539073	2542492	275645	278951	SPCC1322.02	SPAC1B9.02c	pxd1	sck1	SPCC1322.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9187192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789656	2539073	2540455	275645	276983	SPCC1322.02	SPBC215.05	pxd1	gpd1	SPCC1322.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.377733305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789657	2539073	3361570	275645	280646	SPCC1322.02	SPAC750.01	pxd1	SPAC750.01	SPCC1322.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.072646878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789658	2539073	2539420	275645	275985	SPCC1322.02	SPCC970.07c	pxd1	raf2	SPCC1322.02	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.740580037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789659	2539073	2539579	275645	276138	SPCC1322.02	SPCP31B10.05	pxd1	tdp1	SPCC1322.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.05501192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789660	2539073	2539937	275645	276481	SPCC1322.02	SPBC1539.08	pxd1	arf6	SPCC1322.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634205571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789661	2539073	2543641	275645	280055	SPCC1322.02	SPAC3H5.08c	pxd1	SPAC3H5.08c	SPCC1322.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.845490676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789662	2539073	2540825	275645	277343	SPCC1322.02	SPBC428.08c	pxd1	clr4	SPCC1322.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.529735504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789663	2539073	3361391	275645	280467	SPCC1322.02	SPAC13G6.01c	pxd1	rad8	SPCC1322.02	SPAC5H10.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.939777078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789664	2539073	2542776	275645	279225	SPCC1322.02	SPAC167.01	pxd1	ire1	SPCC1322.02	ppk4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.946760999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789665	2539073	2539990	275645	276534	SPCC1322.02	SPBC1289.14	pxd1	SPBC1289.14	SPCC1322.02	SPBC8E4.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.81088497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789666	2539073	2541543	275645	278043	SPCC1322.02	SPAC5H10.04	pxd1	SPAC5H10.04	SPCC1322.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.625331257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789667	2539073	2541735	275645	278229	SPCC1322.02	SPAC7D4.04	pxd1	atg11	SPCC1322.02	taf1|cvt9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842066885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789668	2539073	2542420	275645	278883	SPCC1322.02	SPAC19D5.03	pxd1	cid1	SPCC1322.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095200035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789669	2539073	2542660	275645	279113	SPCC1322.02	SPAC328.03	pxd1	tps1	SPCC1322.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390765665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789670	2539073	2541704	275645	278199	SPCC1322.02	SPAC1250.04c	pxd1	atl1	SPCC1322.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.875032343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789671	2539073	2542946	275645	279386	SPCC1322.02	SPAC6F12.03c	pxd1	fsv1	SPCC1322.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.682197646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789672	2539073	2540107	275645	276644	SPCC1322.02	SPBC106.08c	pxd1	mug2	SPCC1322.02	B13958-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.067865137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789673	2539073	2540374	275645	276903	SPCC1322.02	SPBC31F10.02	pxd1	SPBC31F10.02	SPCC1322.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.740406459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789674	2539073	2541746	275645	278240	SPCC1322.02	SPAC20G4.04c	pxd1	hus1	SPCC1322.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037023674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789675	2539073	2539812	275645	276362	SPCC1322.02	SPBC1347.02	pxd1	fkbp39	SPCC1322.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.858178718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789676	2539073	2538848	275645	275429	SPCC1322.02	SPCC613.12c	pxd1	raf1	SPCC1322.02	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.896530982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789677	2539073	2540619	275645	277145	SPCC1322.02	SPBC25H2.15	pxd1	SPBC25H2.15	SPCC1322.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.184530469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789678	2539073	2541175	275645	277689	SPCC1322.02	SPBC839.13c	pxd1	rpl1601	SPCC1322.02	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989160717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789679	2539073	2543304	275645	279728	SPCC1322.02	SPAC6B12.12	pxd1	tom70	SPCC1322.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.513842488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789680	2539073	2543662	275645	280076	SPCC1322.02	SPAC9.07c	pxd1	SPAC9.07c	SPCC1322.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.329658553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789681	2539073	2543439	275645	279859	SPCC1322.02	SPAPB1A10.13	pxd1	SPAPB1A10.13	SPCC1322.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.467005707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789682	2539073	2540568	275645	277095	SPCC1322.02	SPBC28F2.08c	pxd1	SPBC28F2.08c	SPCC1322.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.691518188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789683	2539073	2540936	275645	277452	SPCC1322.02	SPBC800.05c	pxd1	atb2	SPCC1322.02	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.451007394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789684	2539073	2542159	275645	278635	SPCC1322.02	SPAC1834.09	pxd1	mug51	SPCC1322.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256277356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789685	2539073	2540360	275645	276889	SPCC1322.02	SPBC2G5.01	pxd1	SPBC2G5.01	SPCC1322.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.385211959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789686	2539073	2542440	275645	278902	SPCC1322.02	SPAC17A2.12	pxd1	rrp1	SPCC1322.02	SPAC17A2.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985963647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789687	2539073	2542094	275645	278571	SPCC1322.02	SPAC29B12.06c	pxd1	rcd1	SPCC1322.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.852183133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789688	2540936	2539050	277452	275623	SPBC800.05c	SPCC11E10.08	atb2	rik1	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.008387841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789689	2540936	2542862	277452	279308	SPBC800.05c	SPAC140.03	atb2	arb1	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.777864108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789690	2540936	2542080	277452	278557	SPBC800.05c	SPAC27D7.03c	atb2	mei2	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987247718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789691	2540936	3361499	277452	280575	SPBC800.05c	SPAC25H1.09	atb2	mde5	alp2|ban5|tub1	SPAC4A8.01|meu30	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.272727655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789692	2540936	2540956	277452	277472	SPBC800.05c	SPBC409.06	atb2	uch2	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.605817295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789693	2540936	2541015	277452	277530	SPBC800.05c	SPBC409.08	atb2	SPBC409.08	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.255818561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789694	2540936	2541032	277452	277547	SPBC800.05c	SPBC3H7.11	atb2	SPBC3H7.11	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.718179954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789695	2540936	2539301	277452	275869	SPBC800.05c	SPCC622.03c	atb2	SPCC622.03c	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093162061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789696	2540936	2540863	277452	277380	SPBC800.05c	SPBC56F2.03	atb2	SPBC56F2.03	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.338479088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789697	2540936	2543524	277452	279942	SPBC800.05c	SPAC4D7.07c	atb2	csi2	alp2|ban5|tub1	SPAC4D7.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.978799689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789698	2540936	2540528	277452	277056	SPBC800.05c	SPBC18H10.04c	atb2	sce3	alp2|ban5|tub1	tif48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.813949762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789699	2540936	2539202	277452	275773	SPBC800.05c	SPCC162.10	atb2	ppk33	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.821834771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789700	2540936	2539876	277452	276422	SPBC800.05c	SPBC1734.07c	atb2	trs8502	alp2|ban5|tub1	SPBC1734.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450385304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789701	2540936	2541130	277452	277645	SPBC800.05c	SPBC776.11	atb2	rpl2801	alp2|ban5|tub1	rpl28-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.818273103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789702	2540936	2540068	277452	276606	SPBC800.05c	SPBC1734.12c	atb2	alg12	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992138193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789703	2540936	2542650	277452	279104	SPBC800.05c	SPAC2C4.10c	atb2	csc4	alp2|ban5|tub1	SPAC2C4.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462719961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789704	2540936	2541856	277452	278347	SPBC800.05c	SPAC23H3.08c	atb2	bub3	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.00229771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789705	2540936	2542502	277452	278960	SPBC800.05c	SPAC139.06	atb2	hat1	alp2|ban5|tub1	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.564775368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789706	2540936	2541633	277452	278129	SPBC800.05c	SPAC664.01c	atb2	swi6	alp2|ban5|tub1	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.429588025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789707	2540936	2541733	277452	278227	SPBC800.05c	SPAC27F1.03c	atb2	uch1	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98840735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789708	2540936	2542701	277452	279154	SPBC800.05c	SPAC26H5.05	atb2	mga2	alp2|ban5|tub1	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.980219733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789709	2540936	2543103	277452	279535	SPBC800.05c	SPAC3F10.09	atb2	SPAC3F10.09	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871327117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789710	2540936	2539332	277452	275898	SPBC800.05c	SPCPB1C11.01	atb2	amt1	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809140775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789711	2540936	2541235	277452	277749	SPBC800.05c	SPBC8D2.12c	atb2	SPBC8D2.12c	alp2|ban5|tub1	pI053	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.405794182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789712	2540936	3361570	277452	280646	SPBC800.05c	SPAC750.01	atb2	SPAC750.01	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.560691014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789713	2540936	2539420	277452	275985	SPBC800.05c	SPCC970.07c	atb2	raf2	alp2|ban5|tub1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.581084927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789714	2540936	2542050	277452	278529	SPBC800.05c	SPAC212.02	atb2	SPAC212.02	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573020511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789715	2540936	2542677	277452	279130	SPBC800.05c	SPAC26F1.10c	atb2	pyp1	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.333371359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789716	2540936	2538775	277452	275357	SPBC800.05c	SPCC23B6.05c	atb2	ssb3	alp2|ban5|tub1	rpa3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049823078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789717	2540936	2541994	277452	278478	SPBC800.05c	SPAC26A3.14c	atb2	SPAC26A3.14c	alp2|ban5|tub1	SPAC23A6.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.2666903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789718	2540936	2543230	277452	279658	SPBC800.05c	SPAC823.13c	atb2	SPAC823.13c	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.687477355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789719	2540936	2543288	277452	279713	SPBC800.05c	SPAC6C3.03c	atb2	SPAC6C3.03c	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925988962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789720	2540936	2542696	277452	279149	SPBC800.05c	SPAC29B12.03	atb2	spd1	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.128053561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789721	2540936	2543383	277452	279805	SPBC800.05c	SPAC869.08	atb2	pcm2	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.567031605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789722	2540936	2539117	277452	275689	SPBC800.05c	SPCC74.06	atb2	mak3	alp2|ban5|tub1	phk2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817978181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789723	2540936	2538833	277452	275414	SPBC800.05c	SPCP1E11.11	atb2	puf6	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870961415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789724	2540936	2542022	277452	278505	SPBC800.05c	SPAC23A1.03	atb2	apt1	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866878674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789725	2540936	2542165	277452	278641	SPBC800.05c	SPAC1782.08c	atb2	rex3	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812396961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789726	2540936	2541323	277452	277835	SPBC800.05c	SPBP35G2.14	atb2	SPBP35G2.14	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.830403194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789727	2540936	2541424	277452	277929	SPBC800.05c	SPAC23G3.04	atb2	ies4	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.260677156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789728	2540936	2542318	277452	278784	SPBC800.05c	SPAC16C9.05	atb2	cph1	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.078323708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789729	2540936	2543685	277452	280099	SPBC800.05c	SPAC3C7.03c	atb2	rad55	alp2|ban5|tub1	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.881370145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789730	2540936	2543296	277452	279721	SPBC800.05c	SPAC9E9.03	atb2	leu2	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816731374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789731	2540936	2543551	277452	279968	SPBC800.05c	SPAC4G8.06c	atb2	trm12	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.329165042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789732	2540936	2543078	277452	279511	SPBC800.05c	SPAC31A2.15c	atb2	dcc1	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.512321415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789733	2540936	2541926	277452	278414	SPBC800.05c	SPAC222.14c	atb2	SPAC222.14c	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.094513583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789734	2540936	2540359	277452	276888	SPBC800.05c	SPBC30D10.14	atb2	SPBC30D10.14	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09104631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789735	2540936	2542558	277452	279014	SPBC800.05c	SPAC1952.07	atb2	rad1	alp2|ban5|tub1	rad19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980497376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789736	2540936	2542331	277452	278797	SPBC800.05c	SPAC1834.05	atb2	alg9	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.380395877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789737	2540936	2543349	277452	279771	SPBC800.05c	SPAC977.02	atb2	SPAC977.02	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.38456208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789738	2540936	2542260	277452	278729	SPBC800.05c	SPAC1F12.05	atb2	SPAC1F12.05	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.329949109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789739	2540936	2541664	277452	278160	SPBC800.05c	SPAC2H10.01	atb2	SPAC2H10.01	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.660579611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789740	2540936	2539870	277452	276416	SPBC800.05c	SPBC1709.18	atb2	tif452	alp2|ban5|tub1	SPBC409.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.892123982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789741	2540936	2541801	277452	278292	SPBC800.05c	SPAC2F7.08c	atb2	snf5	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924600089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789742	2540936	2541800	277452	278291	SPBC800.05c	SPAC732.02c	atb2	SPAC732.02c	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874124042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789743	2540936	2541545	277452	278045	SPBC800.05c	SPAC22F8.07c	atb2	rtf1	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.409791416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789744	2540936	2538770	277452	275353	SPBC800.05c	SPCC1753.02c	atb2	git3	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.144367666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789745	2540936	2541160	277452	277675	SPBC800.05c	SPBC725.09c	atb2	hob3	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.664196785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789746	2540936	2542123	277452	278599	SPBC800.05c	SPAC18G6.15	atb2	mal3	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932191871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789747	2540936	2538706	277452	275290	SPBC800.05c	SPCC338.08	atb2	ctp1	alp2|ban5|tub1	mug38|nip1|slr9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929315439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789748	2540936	2542543	277452	279000	SPBC800.05c	SPAC30D11.11	atb2	SPAC30D11.11	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932227713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789749	2540936	2539073	277452	275645	SPBC800.05c	SPCC1322.02	atb2	pxd1	alp2|ban5|tub1	SPCC1322.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.451007394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789750	2540936	2542420	277452	278883	SPBC800.05c	SPAC19D5.03	atb2	cid1	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196319475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789751	2540936	2541889	277452	278379	SPBC800.05c	SPAC2F7.03c	atb2	pom1	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.009010442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789752	2540936	2543313	277452	279737	SPBC800.05c	SPAPJ691.03	atb2	SPAPJ691.03	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.978913973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789753	2540936	2541166	277452	277681	SPBC800.05c	SPBC725.15	atb2	ura5	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979708675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789754	2540936	2538871	277452	275450	SPBC800.05c	SPCC1259.14c	atb2	meu27	alp2|ban5|tub1	B8647-6	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924389644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789755	2540936	2539857	277452	276404	SPBC800.05c	SPBC1604.20c	atb2	tea2	alp2|ban5|tub1	klp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932982583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789756	2540936	2542651	277452	279105	SPBC800.05c	SPAC24C9.12c	atb2	SPAC24C9.12c	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929405719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789757	2540936	2539624	277452	276181	SPBC800.05c	SPBC1289.16c	atb2	cao2	alp2|ban5|tub1	SPBC8E4.06|spao2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.102199338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789758	2540936	2539667	277452	276222	SPBC800.05c	SPBC13G1.08c	atb2	ash2	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.93130666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789759	2540936	2539000	277452	275574	SPBC800.05c	SPCC1450.06c	atb2	grx3	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987513729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789760	2540936	2542007	277452	278490	SPBC800.05c	SPAC20H4.07	atb2	rad57	alp2|ban5|tub1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.699237881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789761	2540936	2538873	277452	275452	SPBC800.05c	SPCC306.11	atb2	SPCC306.11	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866359667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789762	2540936	2538774	277452	275356	SPBC800.05c	SPCC162.06c	atb2	SPCC162.06c	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816413324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789763	2540936	2543244	277452	279672	SPBC800.05c	SPAC6B12.06c	atb2	rrg9	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.608910242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789764	2540936	2540427	277452	276955	SPBC800.05c	SPBC2A9.13	atb2	SPBC2A9.13	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.772392518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789765	2540936	2540374	277452	276903	SPBC800.05c	SPBC31F10.02	atb2	SPBC31F10.02	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196594914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789766	2540936	2540318	277452	276848	SPBC800.05c	SPBC30B4.04c	atb2	sol1	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.459007192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789767	2540936	2539408	277452	275973	SPBC800.05c	SPCC576.12c	atb2	mhf2	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.335374467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789768	2540936	2543522	277452	279940	SPBC800.05c	SPAPB24D3.08c	atb2	SPAPB24D3.08c	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873967223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789769	2540936	2540335	277452	276865	SPBC800.05c	SPBC30B4.03c	atb2	adn1	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090589304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789770	2540936	2539424	277452	275989	SPBC800.05c	SPCC622.19	atb2	jmj4	alp2|ban5|tub1	mug149	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.942713132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789771	2540936	2542813	277452	279260	SPBC800.05c	SPAC29B12.11c	atb2	SPAC29B12.11c	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.336558218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789772	2540936	2542720	277452	279171	SPBC800.05c	SPAC25G10.05c	atb2	his1	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930178755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789773	2540936	2542125	277452	278601	SPBC800.05c	SPAP8A3.03	atb2	SPAP8A3.03	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.14582891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789774	2540936	2542008	277452	278491	SPBC800.05c	SPAC2G11.07c	atb2	ptc3	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.804265233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789775	2540936	2540342	277452	276871	SPBC800.05c	SPBC2G2.01c	atb2	liz1	alp2|ban5|tub1	SPBC4B4.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814100428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789776	2540936	2540533	277452	277061	SPBC800.05c	SPBC29A10.16c	atb2	SPBC29A10.16c	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035613173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789777	2540936	2542829	277452	279276	SPBC800.05c	SPAC13D6.02c	atb2	byr3	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.613896063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789778	2540936	2543049	277452	279484	SPBC800.05c	SPAC1296.04	atb2	mug65	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642193243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789779	2540936	3361134	277452	280210	SPBC800.05c	SPCC737.09c	atb2	hmt1	alp2|ban5|tub1	SPCC74.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877835732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789780	2540936	2543254	277452	279682	SPBC800.05c	SPAC1006.03c	atb2	red1	alp2|ban5|tub1	iss3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147203235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789781	2540936	2543139	277452	279571	SPBC800.05c	SPAC12G12.03	atb2	cip2	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.557178171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789782	2540936	2538848	277452	275429	SPBC800.05c	SPCC613.12c	atb2	raf1	alp2|ban5|tub1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.084176877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789783	2540936	2542869	277452	279314	SPBC800.05c	SPAC140.02	atb2	gar2	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091111118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789784	2540936	2539908	277452	276454	SPBC800.05c	SPBC13E7.06	atb2	msd1	alp2|ban5|tub1	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.939883426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789785	2540936	2543113	277452	279545	SPBC800.05c	SPAC3F10.07c	atb2	erf4	alp2|ban5|tub1	mug91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.817020666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789786	2540936	2540460	277452	276988	SPBC800.05c	SPBC2A9.07c	atb2	hpz1	alp2|ban5|tub1	SPBC2A9.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.412717843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789787	2540936	2542992	277452	279430	SPBC800.05c	SPAC1071.09c	atb2	SPAC1071.09c	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.155459416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789788	2540936	2541370	277452	277881	SPBC800.05c	SPBP8B7.07c	atb2	set6	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874936981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789789	2540936	2540242	277452	276774	SPBC800.05c	SPBC32F12.07c	atb2	SPBC32F12.07c	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985868853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789790	2540936	2543071	277452	279504	SPBC800.05c	SPAC3C7.06c	atb2	pit1	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873977061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789791	2540936	2538761	277452	275344	SPBC800.05c	SPCC622.02	atb2	SPCC622.02	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925107599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789792	2540936	2540498	277452	277026	SPBC800.05c	SPBC27.02c	atb2	ask1	alp2|ban5|tub1	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.502935243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789793	2540936	2539030	277452	275603	SPBC800.05c	SPCP1E11.02	atb2	ppk38	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.413074009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789794	2540936	2540800	277452	277319	SPBC800.05c	SPBC409.20c	atb2	psh3	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.051173748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789795	2540936	2538966	277452	275540	SPBC800.05c	SPCC18.10	atb2	SPCC18.10	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783701017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789796	2540936	2540702	277452	277226	SPBC800.05c	SPBC19F8.03c	atb2	yap18	alp2|ban5|tub1	SPBC19F8.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040171796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789797	2540936	2539246	277452	275816	SPBC800.05c	SPCC18.13	atb2	SPCC18.13	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980649989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789798	2540936	2540960	277452	277476	SPBC800.05c	SPBC3D6.02	atb2	but2	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928125631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789799	2540936	2541279	277452	277792	SPBC800.05c	SPBC8E4.03	atb2	SPBC8E4.03	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873787251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789800	2540936	2539614	277452	276172	SPBC800.05c	SPBC17D11.08	atb2	SPBC17D11.08	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.719242287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789801	2540936	2542955	277452	279395	SPBC800.05c	SPAC11E3.12	atb2	SPAC11E3.12	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.337337508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789802	2540936	2542418	277452	278881	SPBC800.05c	SPAC1805.07c	atb2	dad2	alp2|ban5|tub1	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.356555006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789803	2540936	3361329	277452	280405	SPBC800.05c	SPBC25H2.10c	atb2	SPBC25H2.10c	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195169648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789804	2540936	2543091	277452	279524	SPBC800.05c	SPAC12G12.15	atb2	sif3	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.869190051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789805	2540936	2539772	277452	276323	SPBC800.05c	SPBC1734.05c	atb2	spf31	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.259453764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789806	2540936	2539668	277452	276223	SPBC800.05c	SPBC11B10.10c	atb2	pht1	alp2|ban5|tub1	pi001	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036304403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789807	2540936	2540516	277452	277044	SPBC800.05c	SPBC21C3.01c	atb2	vps13a	alp2|ban5|tub1	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.56849778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789808	2540936	2543183	277452	279612	SPBC800.05c	SPAC3A12.06c	atb2	SPAC3A12.06c	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872386005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789809	2540936	2541744	277452	278238	SPBC800.05c	SPAC23A1.02c	atb2	SPAC23A1.02c	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.343894757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789810	2540936	2543672	277452	280086	SPBC800.05c	SPAC4H3.01	atb2	SPAC4H3.01	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035528317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789811	2540936	2539205	277452	275775	SPBC800.05c	SPCC4B3.15	atb2	mid1	alp2|ban5|tub1	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.650461038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789812	2540936	2543525	277452	279943	SPBC800.05c	SPAC4A8.14	atb2	SPAC4A8.14	alp2|ban5|tub1	prs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633516517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789813	2540936	2540551	277452	277078	SPBC800.05c	SPBC23E6.01c	atb2	cxr1	alp2|ban5|tub1	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704216175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789814	2540936	2538792	277452	275373	SPBC800.05c	SPCP1E11.10	atb2	SPCP1E11.10	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193045374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789815	2540936	2540808	277452	277327	SPBC800.05c	SPBC418.02	atb2	SPBC418.02	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152390269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789816	2540936	2543513	277452	279931	SPBC800.05c	SPAC821.06	atb2	spn2	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.848535892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789817	2540936	2539181	277452	275752	SPBC800.05c	SPCC622.14	atb2	SPCC622.14	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98966781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789818	2540936	2541806	277452	278297	SPBC800.05c	SPAC4G8.13c	atb2	prz1	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.078737934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789819	2540936	2541808	277452	278299	SPBC800.05c	SPAC22A12.14c	atb2	SPAC22A12.14c	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875058475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789820	2540936	2540372	277452	276901	SPBC800.05c	SPBC31F10.03	atb2	SPBC31F10.03	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987458122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789821	2540936	2542073	277452	278550	SPBC800.05c	SPAC26F1.01	atb2	sec74	alp2|ban5|tub1	SPAPJ691.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.181389008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789822	2540936	2543616	277452	280030	SPBC800.05c	SPAC4A8.09c	atb2	cwf21	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.561598134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789823	2540936	2539001	277452	275575	SPBC800.05c	SPCC1494.08c	atb2	SPCC1494.08c	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.272292349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789824	2540936	2543024	277452	279460	SPBC800.05c	SPAC1039.02	atb2	SPAC1039.02	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.837597263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789825	2541869	2538721	278359	275305	SPAC22F3.13	SPCC1494.10	tsc1	adn3	-	SPCC70.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.440567461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789826	2541869	2542577	278359	279033	SPAC22F3.13	SPAC19G12.15c	tsc1	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.560337067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789827	2541869	2542518	278359	278976	SPAC22F3.13	SPAC1B3.16c	tsc1	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.93298986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789828	2541869	2542293	278359	278761	SPAC22F3.13	SPAC17G8.14c	tsc1	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.568110898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789829	2541869	2538993	278359	275567	SPAC22F3.13	SPCC162.12	tsc1	tco89	-	SPCC1753.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.245963747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789830	2541869	2542747	278359	279197	SPAC22F3.13	SPAC15A10.06	tsc1	SPAC15A10.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.630462936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789831	2541869	2541345	278359	277856	SPAC22F3.13	SPBP35G2.07	tsc1	ilv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.331072075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789832	2541869	2541771	278359	278265	SPAC22F3.13	SPAC23H3.06	tsc1	apl6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.007433187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789833	2541869	2538922	278359	275499	SPAC22F3.13	SPCC16C4.10	tsc1	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.566252588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789834	2541869	2539564	278359	276125	SPAC22F3.13	SPCC550.12	tsc1	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.585359543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789835	2541869	2542689	278359	279142	SPAC22F3.13	SPAC29B12.04	tsc1	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707007335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789836	2541869	2540919	278359	277435	SPAC22F3.13	SPBC543.07	tsc1	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.432409864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789837	2541869	2541119	278359	277634	SPAC22F3.13	SPBC651.11c	tsc1	apm3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.916243277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789838	2541869	2542022	278359	278505	SPAC22F3.13	SPAC23A1.03	tsc1	apt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.127471413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789839	2541869	2539244	278359	275814	SPAC22F3.13	SPCC1672.06c	tsc1	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.699135396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789840	2541869	2540964	278359	277480	SPAC22F3.13	SPBC365.16	tsc1	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.834678585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789841	2541869	2540892	278359	277408	SPAC22F3.13	SPBC530.01	tsc1	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.878546854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789842	2541869	2541160	278359	277675	SPAC22F3.13	SPBC725.09c	tsc1	hob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.720658517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789843	2541869	2540348	278359	276877	SPAC22F3.13	SPBC29A10.05	tsc1	exo1	-	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.398856096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789844	2541869	2542659	278359	279112	SPAC22F3.13	SPAC25B8.08	tsc1	SPAC25B8.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09523308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789845	2541869	2542168	278359	278643	SPAC22F3.13	SPAC17A5.16	tsc1	ftp105	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.317157768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789846	2541869	2541310	278359	277822	SPAC22F3.13	SPBP18G5.03	tsc1	toc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.342986243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789847	2541869	2541899	278359	278389	SPAC22F3.13	SPAC22E12.11c	tsc1	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.472542759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789848	2541869	2540831	278359	277349	SPAC22F3.13	SPBC428.02c	tsc1	eca39	-	SPBC582.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707170008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789849	2541869	2542857	278359	279303	SPAC22F3.13	SPAC144.06	tsc1	apl5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.709121515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789850	2541869	2540665	278359	277190	SPAC22F3.13	SPBC83.02c	tsc1	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.196239688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789851	2541869	2542976	278359	279414	SPAC22F3.13	SPAC9E9.09c	tsc1	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569104237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789852	2541869	2541241	278359	277755	SPAC22F3.13	SPBC887.17	tsc1	SPBC887.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.903153147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789853	2541869	2539958	278359	276502	SPAC22F3.13	SPBC1718.07c	tsc1	zfs1	-	moc4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.481632443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789854	2541869	2541900	278359	278390	SPAC22F3.13	SPAC23H4.17c	tsc1	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258420753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789855	2541869	2542519	278359	278977	SPAC22F3.13	SPAC19G12.08	tsc1	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.837844323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789856	2541869	2542437	278359	278899	SPAC22F3.13	SPAC17A5.01	tsc1	pex6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.057900033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789857	2541869	2540201	278359	276734	SPAC22F3.13	SPBC13A2.04c	tsc1	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322215517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789858	2541869	2542597	278359	279051	SPAC22F3.13	SPAP8A3.07c	tsc1	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147226945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789859	2541869	2540533	278359	277061	SPAC22F3.13	SPBC29A10.16c	tsc1	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.680318645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789860	2541869	2538884	278359	275462	SPAC22F3.13	SPCC1393.08	tsc1	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.328342524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789861	2541869	2540193	278359	276726	SPAC22F3.13	SPBC1289.10c	tsc1	adn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635606644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789862	2541869	2539527	278359	276089	SPAC22F3.13	SPCC338.16	tsc1	pof3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816430003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789863	2541869	2540930	278359	277446	SPAC22F3.13	SPBC354.10	tsc1	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.438767943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789864	2541869	2539160	278359	275732	SPAC22F3.13	SPCC18.17c	tsc1	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446878826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789865	2541869	2543619	278359	280033	SPAC22F3.13	SPAC4F10.04	tsc1	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.023358373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789866	2541869	2540061	278359	276599	SPAC22F3.13	SPBC119.12	tsc1	rud3	-	SPBC119.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817357671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789867	2541869	2542881	278359	279326	SPAC22F3.13	SPAC13F5.03c	tsc1	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.39037484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789868	2541869	2540800	278359	277319	SPAC22F3.13	SPBC409.20c	tsc1	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.04935563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789869	2541869	2540531	278359	277059	SPAC22F3.13	SPBC23E6.08	tsc1	sat1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.184996371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789870	2541869	2541531	278359	278031	SPAC22F3.13	SPAC25A8.01c	tsc1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.678876615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789871	2541869	2541470	278359	277972	SPAC22F3.13	SPAPYUG7.04c	tsc1	rpb9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.348845263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789872	2541869	2543437	278359	279857	SPAC22F3.13	SPAPB1A10.14	tsc1	pof15	-	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.371442176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789873	2541869	2539668	278359	276223	SPAC22F3.13	SPBC11B10.10c	tsc1	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.055913387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789874	2541869	2543516	278359	279934	SPAC22F3.13	SPAC4F10.11	tsc1	spn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.804899063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789875	2541869	2539205	278359	275775	SPAC22F3.13	SPCC4B3.15	tsc1	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.96574725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789876	2541869	2539189	278359	275760	SPAC22F3.13	SPCC1682.16	tsc1	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.617600758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789877	2541869	2539169	278359	275740	SPAC22F3.13	SPCC1235.11	tsc1	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.221945712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789878	2541869	2538854	278359	275435	SPAC22F3.13	SPCP1E11.05c	tsc1	are2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.118982779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789879	2541869	2543472	278359	279892	SPAC22F3.13	SPAC959.04c	tsc1	omh6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868241305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789880	2542200	2541902	278675	278392	SPAC19D5.01	SPAC27E2.07	pyp2	pvg2	-	mug53	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51268821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789881	2542200	2541912	278675	278402	SPAC19D5.01	SPAC222.16c	pyp2	csn3	-	SPAC821.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870066296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789882	2542200	2539165	278675	275736	SPAC19D5.01	SPCC1281.04	pyp2	SPCC1281.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.383071182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789883	2542200	2539263	278675	275833	SPAC19D5.01	SPCC895.09c	pyp2	ucp12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.938464246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789884	2542200	2539576	278675	276136	SPAC19D5.01	SPCC794.01c	pyp2	zwf2	-	SPCC794.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869739926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789885	2542200	2540306	278675	276836	SPAC19D5.01	SPBC2G5.02c	pyp2	ckb2	-	SPBC2G5.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.984436736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789886	2542200	2539797	278675	276347	SPAC19D5.01	SPBC16G5.14c	pyp2	rps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386906543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789887	2542200	2543586	278675	280001	SPAC19D5.01	SPAC458.04c	pyp2	dli1	-	dil1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.983210866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789888	2542200	2541527	278675	278027	SPAC19D5.01	SPAC31A2.09c	pyp2	apm4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992307179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789889	2542200	2542277	278675	278746	SPAC19D5.01	SPAC17A5.02c	pyp2	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842677261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789890	2542200	2540663	278675	277188	SPAC19D5.01	SPBC56F2.06	pyp2	mug147	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.252394544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789891	2542200	2541004	278675	277519	SPAC19D5.01	SPBC3F6.01c	pyp2	SPBC3F6.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449423854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789892	2542200	2538972	278675	275546	SPAC19D5.01	SPCC1739.15	pyp2	wtf21	-	wtf3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.195900162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789893	2542200	2539467	278675	276030	SPAC19D5.01	SPCC417.07c	pyp2	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812218134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789894	2542200	2542679	278675	279132	SPAC19D5.01	SPAC12B10.07	pyp2	acp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.198927981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789895	2542200	2542177	278675	278652	SPAC19D5.01	SPAC17H9.08	pyp2	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442772982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789896	2542200	2541250	278675	277764	SPAC19D5.01	SPBC8D2.17	pyp2	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.839543121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789897	2542200	2542521	278675	278979	SPAC19D5.01	SPAC18G6.12c	pyp2	SPAC18G6.12c	-	B22918-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.484399628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789898	2542200	2540497	278675	277025	SPAC19D5.01	SPBC27.04	pyp2	uds1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568719428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789899	2542200	2540326	278675	276856	SPAC19D5.01	SPBC2G5.06c	pyp2	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.140255531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789900	2542200	2540256	278675	276787	SPAC19D5.01	SPBC32F12.12c	pyp2	SPBC32F12.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.624160466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789901	2542200	2539974	278675	276518	SPAC19D5.01	SPBC32H8.07	pyp2	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.620200055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789902	2542200	2540836	278675	277354	SPAC19D5.01	SPBC18H10.19	pyp2	vps38	-	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.444172393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789903	2542200	2543378	278675	279800	SPAC19D5.01	SPAC3H8.07c	pyp2	pac10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318608501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789904	2542200	2542398	278675	278862	SPAC19D5.01	SPAC1805.03c	pyp2	trm13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851106122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789905	2542200	2542519	278675	278977	SPAC19D5.01	SPAC19G12.08	pyp2	scs7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154146775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789906	2542200	2538708	278675	275292	SPAC19D5.01	SPCC594.01	pyp2	SPCC594.01	-	SPCC736.16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509087009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789907	2542200	2543315	278675	279739	SPAC19D5.01	SPAC6B12.07c	pyp2	SPAC6B12.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928150691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789908	2542200	2540357	278675	276886	SPAC19D5.01	SPBC2F12.05c	pyp2	SPBC2F12.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45079945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789909	2542200	2541337	278675	277848	SPAC19D5.01	SPBP35G2.13c	pyp2	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.991839685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789910	2542200	2542881	278675	279326	SPAC19D5.01	SPAC13F5.03c	pyp2	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.620920929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789911	2542200	2540881	278675	277398	SPAC19D5.01	SPBC577.14c	pyp2	spa1	-	spa	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.264257551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789912	2542200	2542940	278675	279381	SPAC19D5.01	SPAC31A2.12	pyp2	SPAC31A2.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.253840017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789913	2542200	2541432	278675	277937	SPAC19D5.01	SPAC1F5.05c	pyp2	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321214026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789914	2542200	2543192	278675	279621	SPAC19D5.01	SPAC343.18	pyp2	rfp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987918399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789915	2542200	2542607	278675	279061	SPAC19D5.01	SPAC18B11.02c	pyp2	SPAC18B11.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328504615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789916	2542200	2538792	278675	275373	SPAC19D5.01	SPCP1E11.10	pyp2	SPCP1E11.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.977950999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789917	2542200	2543486	278675	279906	SPAC19D5.01	SPAC959.07	pyp2	rps403	-	rps4|rps4-3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647836705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789918	2542200	2541806	278675	278297	SPAC19D5.01	SPAC4G8.13c	pyp2	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325484749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789919	2542200	2542159	278675	278635	SPAC19D5.01	SPAC1834.09	pyp2	mug51	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.841337179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789920	2542200	2542424	278675	278886	SPAC19D5.01	SPAC1805.14	pyp2	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377546629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789921	2542200	2540938	278675	277454	SPAC19D5.01	SPBC365.14c	pyp2	uge1	-	gal10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388765781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789922	2542200	2543646	278675	280060	SPAC19D5.01	SPAC821.07c	pyp2	moc3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814700986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789923	2539027	2542701	275600	279154	SPCC1322.08	SPAC26H5.05	srk1	mga2	mkp1	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.251469557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789924	2539027	2539332	275600	275898	SPCC1322.08	SPCPB1C11.01	srk1	amt1	mkp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.590771397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789925	2539027	2539420	275600	275985	SPCC1322.08	SPCC970.07c	srk1	raf2	mkp1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.338333905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789926	2539027	2538972	275600	275546	SPCC1322.08	SPCC1739.15	srk1	wtf21	mkp1	wtf3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634642647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789927	2539027	2539381	275600	275947	SPCC1322.08	SPCC1739.10	srk1	mug33	mkp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.271530524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789928	2539027	2541801	275600	278292	SPCC1322.08	SPAC2F7.08c	srk1	snf5	mkp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.99691394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789929	2539027	2542469	275600	278930	SPCC1322.08	SPAC19A8.04	srk1	erg5	mkp1	cyp61	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.553561025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789930	2539027	2539974	275600	276518	SPCC1322.08	SPBC32H8.07	srk1	git5	mkp1	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.824141698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789931	2539027	2538848	275600	275429	SPCC1322.08	SPCC613.12c	srk1	raf1	mkp1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.480529288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789932	2539027	2539101	275600	275673	SPCC1322.08	SPCC736.04c	srk1	gma12	mkp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63319656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789933	2539027	2543619	275600	280033	SPCC1322.08	SPAC4F10.04	srk1	ypa1	mkp1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.631981271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789934	2539027	2541789	275600	278281	SPCC1322.08	SPAC23H4.08	srk1	iwr1	mkp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.001894891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789935	2543107	2539510	279539	276072	SPAC3A12.05c	SPCC4G3.04c	taf2	coq5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812396393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789936	2539461	2542072	276024	278549	SPCC63.08c	SPAP32A8.03c	atg1	bop1	cvt10|ppk36	SPAP32A8.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639158451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789937	2539461	2542812	276024	279259	SPCC63.08c	SPAC6F6.01	atg1	cch1	cvt10|ppk36	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816029695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789938	2539461	2540131	276024	276668	SPCC63.08c	SPBC1778.05c	atg1	SPBC1778.05c	cvt10|ppk36	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.914524163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789939	2539461	2542758	276024	279208	SPCC63.08c	SPAC15E1.02c	atg1	SPAC15E1.02c	cvt10|ppk36	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.271403483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789940	2539461	2540491	276024	277019	SPCC63.08c	SPBC28E12.04	atg1	SPBC28E12.04	cvt10|ppk36	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.130478638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789941	2539461	2542677	276024	279130	SPCC63.08c	SPAC26F1.10c	atg1	pyp1	cvt10|ppk36	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.410906172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789942	2539461	2541205	276024	277719	SPCC63.08c	SPBC839.02	atg1	SPBC839.02	cvt10|ppk36	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.94512272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789943	2539461	2538801	276024	275382	SPCC63.08c	SPCC285.13c	atg1	nup60	cvt10|ppk36	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197351313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789944	2539461	2543453	276024	279873	SPCC63.08c	SPAC3G9.03	atg1	rpl2301	cvt10|ppk36	rpl23-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86469094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789945	2539461	2541998	276024	278482	SPCC63.08c	SPAC23A1.09	atg1	SPAC23A1.09	cvt10|ppk36	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514718073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789946	2539461	2541538	276024	278038	SPCC63.08c	SPAC24B11.08c	atg1	SPAC24B11.08c	cvt10|ppk36	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.70889021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789947	2539461	2540425	276024	276953	SPCC63.08c	SPBC27.06c	atg1	mgr2	cvt10|ppk36	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.385645633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789948	2539461	2543685	276024	280099	SPCC63.08c	SPAC3C7.03c	atg1	rad55	cvt10|ppk36	rhp55	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81887984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789949	2539461	2540714	276024	277237	SPCC63.08c	SPBC19C2.04c	atg1	ubp11	cvt10|ppk36	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.939541987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789950	2539461	2541905	276024	278395	SPCC63.08c	SPAC6G9.01c	atg1	SPAC6G9.01c	cvt10|ppk36	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.118185038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789951	2539461	2542845	276024	279291	SPCC63.08c	SPAC824.04	atg1	SPAC824.04	cvt10|ppk36	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.662468374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789952	2539461	2540964	276024	277480	SPCC63.08c	SPBC365.16	atg1	SPBC365.16	cvt10|ppk36	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873093338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789953	2539461	2542568	276024	279024	SPCC63.08c	SPAC1952.02	atg1	tma23	cvt10|ppk36	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.859640894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789954	2539461	2541664	276024	278160	SPCC63.08c	SPAC2H10.01	atg1	SPAC2H10.01	cvt10|ppk36	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.748163573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789955	2539461	2538770	276024	275353	SPCC63.08c	SPCC1753.02c	atg1	git3	cvt10|ppk36	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44931763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789956	2539461	2542776	276024	279225	SPCC63.08c	SPAC167.01	atg1	ire1	cvt10|ppk36	ppk4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582079952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789957	2539461	2541735	276024	278229	SPCC63.08c	SPAC7D4.04	atg1	atg11	cvt10|ppk36	taf1|cvt9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.40946917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789958	2539461	2539898	276024	276444	SPCC63.08c	SPBC12D12.07c	atg1	trx2	cvt10|ppk36	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.438471055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789959	2539461	2542925	276024	279366	SPCC63.08c	SPAC11E3.04c	atg1	ubc13	cvt10|ppk36	spu13|sst5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.620490031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789960	2539461	2542857	276024	279303	SPCC63.08c	SPAC144.06	atg1	apl5	cvt10|ppk36	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.769767605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789961	2539461	2538769	276024	275352	SPCC63.08c	SPCC126.04c	atg1	sgf73	cvt10|ppk36	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987734417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789962	2539461	2542032	276024	278514	SPCC63.08c	SPAC23C11.04c	atg1	pnk1	cvt10|ppk36	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319691653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789963	2539461	2541595	276024	278092	SPCC63.08c	SPAC1565.01	atg1	SPAC1565.01	cvt10|ppk36	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.103553182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789964	2539461	2539958	276024	276502	SPCC63.08c	SPBC1718.07c	atg1	zfs1	cvt10|ppk36	moc4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093580305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789965	2539461	2542254	276024	278724	SPCC63.08c	SPAC30D11.04c	atg1	nup124	cvt10|ppk36	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.189995835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789966	2539461	2540599	276024	277125	SPCC63.08c	SPBC29A3.10c	atg1	atp14	cvt10|ppk36	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.474807076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789967	2539461	2542255	276024	278725	SPCC63.08c	SPAC57A7.08	atg1	pzh1	cvt10|ppk36	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.817950504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789968	2539461	2541713	276024	278208	SPCC63.08c	SPAC3A12.12	atg1	atp11	cvt10|ppk36	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05418662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789969	2539461	2542767	276024	279217	SPCC63.08c	SPAC1565.07c	atg1	knd1	cvt10|ppk36	SPAC1565.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504243456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789970	2539461	2543670	276024	280084	SPCC63.08c	SPAPB1E7.06c	atg1	eme1	cvt10|ppk36	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.751613516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789971	2539461	2538750	276024	275333	SPCC63.08c	SPCC622.04	atg1	SPCC622.04	cvt10|ppk36	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388110404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789972	2539461	2542075	276024	278552	SPCC63.08c	SPAC27D7.06	atg1	etf1	cvt10|ppk36	SPAC27D7.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.840554191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789973	2539461	2539514	276024	276076	SPCC63.08c	SPCC663.14c	atg1	trp663	cvt10|ppk36	SPCC663.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979203613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789974	2539461	2542685	276024	279138	SPCC63.08c	SPAC26A3.06	atg1	bud23	cvt10|ppk36	SPAC26A3.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926922465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789975	2539461	2542826	276024	279273	SPCC63.08c	SPAC13G6.09	atg1	SPAC13G6.09	cvt10|ppk36	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.752408333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789976	2539461	2540380	276024	276909	SPCC63.08c	SPBC1A4.05	atg1	blt1	cvt10|ppk36	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.936817663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789977	2539461	2538840	276024	275421	SPCC63.08c	SPCC736.07c	atg1	SPCC736.07c	cvt10|ppk36	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.347729239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789978	2539461	2541645	276024	278141	SPCC63.08c	SPAC1527.03	atg1	SPAC1527.03	cvt10|ppk36	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045597318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789979	2539461	2541357	276024	277868	SPCC63.08c	SPBPB7E8.01	atg1	SPBPB7E8.01	cvt10|ppk36	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.973223227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789980	2539461	2541806	276024	278297	SPCC63.08c	SPAC4G8.13c	atg1	prz1	cvt10|ppk36	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.804496086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789981	2539461	2543327	276024	279750	SPCC63.08c	SPAC1D4.06c	atg1	csk1	cvt10|ppk36	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.322871799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789982	2539461	2543060	276024	279494	SPCC63.08c	SPAC30C2.08	atg1	SPAC30C2.08	cvt10|ppk36	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819811894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789983	2539461	2539128	276024	275700	SPCC63.08c	SPCC1682.06	atg1	SPCC1682.06	cvt10|ppk36	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.984247962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789984	2539461	2540734	276024	277257	SPCC63.08c	SPBC19G7.09	atg1	ulp1	cvt10|ppk36	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.882713276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789985	2539461	2542609	276024	279063	SPCC63.08c	SPAC31G5.04	atg1	lys12	cvt10|ppk36	SPAC31G5.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.24918801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789986	2540322	2542895	276852	279339	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC13G6.10c	SPBC31F10.10c	asl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.343626941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789987	2540322	2542862	276852	279308	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC140.03	SPBC31F10.10c	arb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567205503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789988	2540322	2542518	276852	278976	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC1B3.16c	SPBC31F10.10c	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579395817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789989	2540322	2539492	276852	276055	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCPB16A4.06c	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCPB16A4.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.250928508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789990	2540322	2543064	276852	279497	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC3G6.01	SPBC31F10.10c	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.325023613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789991	2540322	2540131	276852	276668	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC1778.05c	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049828567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789992	2540322	2542643	276852	279097	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC2C4.07c	SPBC31F10.10c	dis32	-	SPAC2C4.07c|dis3L2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.62317302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789993	2540322	2543575	276852	279990	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC644.13c	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC644.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.558115614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789994	2540322	2542358	276852	278823	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC31F10.10c	clp1	-	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637212394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789995	2540322	2542293	276852	278761	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC31F10.10c	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.836197482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789996	2540322	2540528	276852	277056	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC18H10.04c	SPBC31F10.10c	sce3	-	tif48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.506513999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789997	2540322	2538993	276852	275567	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC162.12	SPBC31F10.10c	tco89	-	SPCC1753.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380276202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789998	2540322	2542831	276852	279278	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC20H4.08	SPBC31F10.10c	whi2	-	SPAC20H4.08|SPAC145.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770310431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
789999	2540322	2539930	276852	276474	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC1198.11c	SPBC31F10.10c	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9093746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790000	2540322	2541853	276852	278344	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC2F3.11	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC2F3.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.435905682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790001	2540322	2541117	276852	277632	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC646.13	SPBC31F10.10c	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.692524133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790002	2540322	2542502	276852	278960	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC139.06	SPBC31F10.10c	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.868098883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790003	2540322	2541345	276852	277856	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBP35G2.07	SPBC31F10.10c	ilv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4375772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790004	2540322	2542492	276852	278951	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC1B9.02c	SPBC31F10.10c	sck1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.447709081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790005	2540322	2542614	276852	279068	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC1399.04c	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC1399.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64386982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790006	2540322	2539890	276852	276436	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC16C6.03c	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC16C6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.629233612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790007	2540322	2542103	276852	278579	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC31G5.11	SPBC31F10.10c	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.319508489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790008	2540322	2538806	276852	275387	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC1840.09	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.263805597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790009	2540322	2541235	276852	277749	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC8D2.12c	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC8D2.12c	-	pI053	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509717862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790010	2540322	2540975	276852	277491	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC354.12	SPBC31F10.10c	gpd3	-	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.629180404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790011	2540322	2542677	276852	279130	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC31F10.10c	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.128165552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790012	2540322	2541012	276852	277527	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC3H7.12	SPBC31F10.10c	rav2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.54653531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790013	2540322	2541313	276852	277825	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBP26C9.02c	SPBC31F10.10c	car1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981508899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790014	2540322	2542273	276852	278742	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.567902523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790015	2540322	2539510	276852	276072	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC4G3.04c	SPBC31F10.10c	coq5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05139351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790016	2540322	2541058	276852	277573	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC3H7.09	SPBC31F10.10c	erf2	-	mug142	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.325307915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790017	2540322	2541682	276852	278178	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC15F9.02	SPBC31F10.10c	seh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636755518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790018	2540322	2539564	276852	276125	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC550.12	SPBC31F10.10c	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.919621827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790019	2540322	2538801	276852	275382	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC285.13c	SPBC31F10.10c	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.31782778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790020	2540322	2542689	276852	279142	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC29B12.04	SPBC31F10.10c	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.355243594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790021	2540322	2539434	276852	275997	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC757.09c	SPBC31F10.10c	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.29725759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790022	2540322	2541026	276852	277541	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC337.09	SPBC31F10.10c	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.27222673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790023	2540322	2539937	276852	276481	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC1539.08	SPBC31F10.10c	arf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.014610974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790024	2540322	2540463	276852	276991	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC2F12.15c	SPBC31F10.10c	pfa3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.62809637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790025	2540322	2542022	276852	278505	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC23A1.03	SPBC31F10.10c	apt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.320834063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790026	2540322	2540425	276852	276953	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC27.06c	SPBC31F10.10c	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844693534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790027	2540322	2542318	276852	278784	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC16C9.05	SPBC31F10.10c	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.565033496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790028	2540322	2542698	276852	279151	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC26H5.09c	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC26H5.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767020293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790029	2540322	2539981	276852	276525	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC1289.09	SPBC31F10.10c	tim21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.322252037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790030	2540322	2540127	276852	276664	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC106.20	SPBC31F10.10c	exo70	-	SPBC582.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.132486866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790031	2540322	2539244	276852	275814	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC1672.06c	SPBC31F10.10c	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.907138612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790032	2540322	2543563	276852	279979	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC664.02c	SPBC31F10.10c	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.057758407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790033	2540322	2543584	276852	279999	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAPB1E7.11c	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326559355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790034	2540322	2542530	276852	278988	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC1399.02	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC1399.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814626206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790035	2540322	2538906	276852	275483	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC1259.03	SPBC31F10.10c	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.988154704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790036	2540322	2539467	276852	276030	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC417.07c	SPBC31F10.10c	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.314890758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790037	2540322	2542596	276852	279050	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC1B3.17	SPBC31F10.10c	clr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.909304997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790038	2540322	2541776	276852	278270	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC23H3.05c	SPBC31F10.10c	swd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040596617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790039	2540322	2543144	276852	279576	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC3F10.05c	SPBC31F10.10c	mug113	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.403202953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790040	2540322	2538770	276852	275353	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC1753.02c	SPBC31F10.10c	git3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197389403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790041	2540322	2541160	276852	277675	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC725.09c	SPBC31F10.10c	hob3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582659638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790042	2540322	2543483	276852	279903	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAPB2B4.02	SPBC31F10.10c	grx5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569633068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790043	2540322	2542123	276852	278599	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC31F10.10c	mal3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.621999192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790044	2540322	2543412	276852	279834	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC637.07	SPBC31F10.10c	moe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.42234931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790045	2540322	2540673	276852	277198	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC31F10.10c	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.148590289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790046	2540322	2542428	276852	278890	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC1805.12c	SPBC31F10.10c	uep1	-	ubi2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037340084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790047	2540322	2541929	276852	278417	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC23C4.12	SPBC31F10.10c	hhp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.268601053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790048	2540322	2542651	276852	279105	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC24C9.12c	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC24C9.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095437182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790049	2540322	2539284	276852	275852	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC584.15c	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC584.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641392161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790050	2540322	2540997	276852	277513	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC3H7.06c	SPBC31F10.10c	pof9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.10342178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790051	2540322	2541955	276852	278442	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC5D6.04	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC5D6.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042451594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790052	2540322	2542946	276852	279386	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC6F12.03c	SPBC31F10.10c	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504471882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790053	2540322	2542976	276852	279414	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC9E9.09c	SPBC31F10.10c	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.057552143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790054	2540322	2543178	276852	279608	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC31G5.15	SPBC31F10.10c	psd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.323584906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790055	2540322	2542740	276852	279190	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC9G1.06c	SPBC31F10.10c	cyk3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189899984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790056	2540322	2539217	276852	275787	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC1223.03c	SPBC31F10.10c	gut2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637431756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790057	2540322	2539974	276852	276518	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC32H8.07	SPBC31F10.10c	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.336959509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790058	2540322	2541720	276852	278214	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC23H3.13c	SPBC31F10.10c	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.072882116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790059	2540322	2542431	276852	278893	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC1A6.01c	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC1A6.01c	-	SPAC23C4.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324871517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790060	2540322	2542549	276852	279006	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC19A8.11c	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708971908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790061	2540322	2542519	276852	278977	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC19G12.08	SPBC31F10.10c	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.337404336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790062	2540322	2542437	276852	278899	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC17A5.01	SPBC31F10.10c	pex6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514683336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790063	2540322	2540387	276852	276915	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC24C6.04	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC24C6.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.050816837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790064	2540322	2540990	276852	277506	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC36B7.06c	SPBC31F10.10c	mug20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.981177039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790065	2540322	2539368	276852	275934	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC16A11.07	SPBC31F10.10c	coq10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.569354928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790066	2540322	2540019	276852	276563	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC1685.01	SPBC31F10.10c	pmp1	-	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.379192383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790067	2540322	2541708	276852	278203	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC31A2.02	SPBC31F10.10c	trm112	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509393475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790068	2540322	2539043	276852	275616	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC1235.08c	SPBC31F10.10c	pdh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445376003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790069	2540322	2540967	276852	277483	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.345861424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790070	2540322	2540599	276852	277125	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC29A3.10c	SPBC31F10.10c	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.444800168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790071	2540322	2540533	276852	277061	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC29A10.16c	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780945332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790072	2540322	2543411	276852	279833	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAPB1A10.10c	SPBC31F10.10c	ypt71	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321661232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790073	2540322	2540926	276852	277442	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC359.06	SPBC31F10.10c	mug14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.85102097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790074	2540322	2540930	276852	277446	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC354.10	SPBC31F10.10c	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.971020847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790075	2540322	2542602	276852	279056	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC186.09	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC186.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708347623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790076	2540322	2542869	276852	279314	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC140.02	SPBC31F10.10c	gar2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.009878624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790077	2540322	2542673	276852	279126	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC26A3.11	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC26A3.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.917646088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790078	2540322	2541628	276852	278124	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC110.02	SPBC31F10.10c	pds5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.921680401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790079	2540322	2542725	276852	279176	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC3A12.10	SPBC31F10.10c	rpl2001	-	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.741887839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790080	2540322	2540821	276852	277339	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC800.03	SPBC31F10.10c	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.275181945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790081	2540322	2540706	276852	277229	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC19C7.12c	SPBC31F10.10c	omh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711996089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790082	2540322	2539160	276852	275732	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC18.17c	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.567244762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790083	2540322	2543332	276852	279755	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAPB8E5.04c	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAPB8E5.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807940293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790084	2540322	2539354	276852	275920	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC4F11.03c	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC4F11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.504011117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790085	2540322	2542759	276852	279209	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC9G1.07	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567653512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790086	2540322	2543628	276852	280042	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC3H8.10	SPBC31F10.10c	spo20	-	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.648325192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790087	2540322	2539438	276852	276001	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC4B3.07	SPBC31F10.10c	nro1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383459654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790088	2540322	2541909	276852	278399	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC227.01c	SPBC31F10.10c	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.105823289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790089	2540322	2543267	276852	279695	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC1002.12c	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC1002.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769378859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790090	2540322	2540800	276852	277319	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC409.20c	SPBC31F10.10c	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.418048203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790091	2540322	2543304	276852	279728	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC31F10.10c	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923434175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790092	2540322	2542541	276852	278998	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC1B3.03c	SPBC31F10.10c	wis2	-	cyp5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.806071417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790093	2540322	2539246	276852	275816	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC18.13	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC18.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331510885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790094	2540322	2541100	276852	277615	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC651.04	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC651.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044638158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790095	2540322	2543662	276852	280076	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC9.07c	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC9.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.18416031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790096	2540322	2541531	276852	278031	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC31F10.10c	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.107475824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790097	2540322	2540346	276852	276875	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC2F12.03c	SPBC31F10.10c	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329888299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790098	2540322	2540699	276852	277223	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC800.08	SPBC31F10.10c	gcd10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.652533251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790099	2540322	2540829	276852	277347	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC800.09	SPBC31F10.10c	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.47698387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790100	2540322	2542418	276852	278881	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC31F10.10c	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.441511556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790101	2540322	2543128	276852	279560	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC3F10.06c	SPBC31F10.10c	rit1	-	SPAC3F10.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779187534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790102	2540322	2540677	276852	277202	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC21B10.03c	SPBC31F10.10c	ath1	-	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.137109389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790103	2540322	2541789	276852	278281	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC31F10.10c	iwr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.938383379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790104	2540322	2543420	276852	279842	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC3H1.04c	SPBC31F10.10c	mdm31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.832644384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790105	2540322	2543044	276852	279479	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC31F10.10c	tip1	-	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.264652497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790106	2540322	2539205	276852	275775	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC4B3.15	SPBC31F10.10c	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.116539173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790107	2540322	2539375	276852	275941	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC4G3.11	SPBC31F10.10c	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767742746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790108	2540322	2539189	276852	275760	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC1682.16	SPBC31F10.10c	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.967151382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790109	2540322	2542244	276852	278714	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC19G12.13c	SPBC31F10.10c	poz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578021103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790110	2540322	2540504	276852	277032	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC24C6.10c	SPBC31F10.10c	dip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.491696612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790111	2540322	2539169	276852	275740	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC1235.11	SPBC31F10.10c	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454796362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790112	2540322	2539700	276852	276253	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC31F10.10c	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.782080118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790113	2540322	2541806	276852	278297	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC31F10.10c	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639109292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790114	2540322	2543327	276852	279750	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC1D4.06c	SPBC31F10.10c	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448564102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790115	2540322	2540766	276852	277286	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC19C2.02	SPBC31F10.10c	pmt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987374422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790116	2540322	2539531	276852	276093	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC576.02	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC576.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711791076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790117	2540322	2543087	276852	279520	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC30C2.04	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC30C2.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443182512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790118	2540322	2540360	276852	276889	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC2G5.01	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC2G5.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454474448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790119	2540322	2541867	276852	278357	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC31F10.10c	sck2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63978712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790120	2540322	2543374	276852	279796	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAPB1A10.08	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAPB1A10.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778813359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790121	2540322	2542656	276852	279110	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC2E1P3.05c	SPBC31F10.10c	SPAC2E1P3.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.916781102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790122	2540322	2540309	276852	276839	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC21B10.13c	SPBC31F10.10c	yox1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.120075615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790123	2540322	2541272	276852	277786	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC947.03c	SPBC31F10.10c	naa38	-	mak31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.90708662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790124	2540322	2540649	276852	277174	SPBC31F10.10c	SPBC19F8.08	SPBC31F10.10c	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.003736989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790125	2541867	2540060	278357	276598	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC106.01	sck2	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.863563405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790126	2541867	2539388	278357	275953	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC24B10.12	sck2	cgi121	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.492295194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790127	2541867	2541776	278357	278270	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC23H3.05c	sck2	swd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.160715502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790128	2541867	2538770	278357	275353	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC1753.02c	sck2	git3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.058762985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790129	2541867	2542469	278357	278930	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC19A8.04	sck2	erg5	-	cyp61	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.789344154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790130	2541867	2541496	278357	277998	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC23D3.09	sck2	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.896055013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790131	2541867	2539974	278357	276518	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC32H8.07	sck2	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.690733256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790132	2541867	2541720	278357	278214	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC23H3.13c	sck2	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.463147618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790133	2541867	2538762	278357	275345	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC306.04c	sck2	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.460789054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790134	2541867	2543304	278357	279728	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC6B12.12	sck2	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.016757201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790135	2541867	2542458	278357	278919	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC30.02c	sck2	SPAC30.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.588281828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790136	2541867	2541531	278357	278031	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC25A8.01c	sck2	fft3	-	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.814819878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790137	2541867	2539205	278357	275775	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC4B3.15	sck2	mid1	-	dmf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.080908341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790138	2541867	2538840	278357	275421	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC736.07c	sck2	SPCC736.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925968442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790139	2542815	2540745	279262	277268	SPAC13D6.01	SPBC21C3.18	pof14	spo4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.266592086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790140	2542815	2542103	279262	278579	SPAC13D6.01	SPAC31G5.11	pof14	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440688139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790141	2542815	2539249	279262	275819	SPAC13D6.01	SPCC1450.05c	pof14	rox3	-	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328807254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790142	2542815	2543453	279262	279873	SPAC13D6.01	SPAC3G9.03	pof14	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509410223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790143	2542815	2539961	279262	276505	SPAC13D6.01	SPBC1198.09	pof14	ubc16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445684214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790144	2542815	2540326	279262	276856	SPAC13D6.01	SPBC2G5.06c	pof14	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328891307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790145	2542815	2539974	279262	276518	SPAC13D6.01	SPBC32H8.07	pof14	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514911409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790146	2542815	2543495	279262	279914	SPAC13D6.01	SPAC513.03	pof14	mfm2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711402861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790147	2542815	2541186	279262	277700	SPAC13D6.01	SPBC725.01	pof14	SPBC725.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.692173549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790148	2542815	2540533	279262	277061	SPAC13D6.01	SPBC29A10.16c	pof14	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.806473686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790149	2542815	2538762	279262	275345	SPAC13D6.01	SPCC306.04c	pof14	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.506703846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790150	2542815	2539188	279262	275759	SPAC13D6.01	SPCC1827.04	pof14	vms1	-	SPCC1827.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983415676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790151	2542815	2539205	279262	275775	SPAC13D6.01	SPCC4B3.15	pof14	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645832929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790152	2542815	2538792	279262	275373	SPAC13D6.01	SPCP1E11.10	pof14	SPCP1E11.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.890304583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790153	2540695	2539350	277219	275916	SPBC19G7.01c	SPCC24B10.17	msh2	emp24	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818585429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790154	2540695	2543652	277219	280066	SPBC19G7.01c	SPAC4H3.03c	msh2	SPAC4H3.03c	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.325728817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790155	2540695	2539201	277219	275772	SPBC19G7.01c	SPCC188.09c	msh2	pfl4	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	SPCC188.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922824216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790156	2540695	2541584	277219	278081	SPBC19G7.01c	SPAP32A8.02	msh2	SPAP32A8.02	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987127312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790157	2540695	2541313	277219	277825	SPBC19G7.01c	SPBP26C9.02c	msh2	car1	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097909788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790158	2540695	2542714	277219	279167	SPBC19G7.01c	SPAC5H10.06c	msh2	adh4	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262843354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790159	2540695	2540834	277219	277352	SPBC19G7.01c	SPBC18H10.18c	msh2	SPBC18H10.18c	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.057123468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790160	2540695	2542596	277219	279050	SPBC19G7.01c	SPAC1B3.17	msh2	clr2	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.558663063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790161	2540695	2539000	277219	275574	SPBC19G7.01c	SPCC1450.06c	msh2	grx3	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041811691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790162	2540695	2540836	277219	277354	SPBC19G7.01c	SPBC18H10.19	msh2	vps38	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	atg14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095188309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790163	2540695	2540327	277219	276857	SPBC19G7.01c	SPBC31F10.07	msh2	lsb5	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.71369841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790164	2540695	2541694	277219	278190	SPBC19G7.01c	SPAC1071.04c	msh2	spc2	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935214688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790165	2540695	2543193	277219	279622	SPBC19G7.01c	SPAC3F10.11c	msh2	abc2	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196333854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790166	2540695	2540946	277219	277462	SPBC19G7.01c	SPBC36.04	msh2	cys11	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	cys1a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.269938188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790167	2540695	2541762	277219	278256	SPBC19G7.01c	SPAC139.01c	msh2	SPAC139.01c	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	SPAC955.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807224724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790168	2540695	2540242	277219	276774	SPBC19G7.01c	SPBC32F12.07c	msh2	SPBC32F12.07c	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442212171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790169	2540695	2542883	277219	279328	SPBC19G7.01c	SPAC1486.04c	msh2	alm1	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.999817859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790170	2540695	2542940	277219	279381	SPBC19G7.01c	SPAC31A2.12	msh2	SPAC31A2.12	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036373289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790171	2540695	2542416	277219	278880	SPBC19G7.01c	SPAC589.03c	msh2	SPAC589.03c	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987184649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790172	2540695	2542607	277219	279061	SPBC19G7.01c	SPAC18B11.02c	msh2	SPAC18B11.02c	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929509883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790173	2540695	2542716	277219	279169	SPBC19G7.01c	SPAC25H1.07	msh2	emc1	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642336208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790174	2540695	2539531	277219	276093	SPBC19G7.01c	SPCC576.02	msh2	SPCC576.02	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819220817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790175	2540695	2539768	277219	276319	SPBC19G7.01c	SPBC1703.09	msh2	SPBC1703.09	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633164174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790176	2540695	2541050	277219	277565	SPBC19G7.01c	SPBC428.05c	msh2	arg12	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813609508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790177	2540274	2539890	276805	276436	SPBC29B5.03c	SPBC16C6.03c	rpl26	SPBC16C6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.15276356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790178	2540274	2542273	276805	278742	SPBC29B5.03c	SPAC17H9.13c	rpl26	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.999814706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790179	2540274	2540834	276805	277352	SPBC29B5.03c	SPBC18H10.18c	rpl26	SPBC18H10.18c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390902231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790180	2540274	2543020	276805	279456	SPBC29B5.03c	SPAC10F6.13c	rpl26	SPAC10F6.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38127124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790181	2540274	2540801	276805	277320	SPBC29B5.03c	SPBC18H10.10c	rpl26	saf4	-	cwc16|cwf16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390483636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790182	2540274	2541536	276805	278036	SPBC29B5.03c	SPAC1071.02	rpl26	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575809516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790183	2540274	2541297	276805	277809	SPBC29B5.03c	SPBC9B6.07	rpl26	nop52	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258122208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790184	2540726	2538939	277249	275514	SPBC216.01c	SPCC1672.04c	psy2	SPCC1672.04c	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636163966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790185	2540726	2539050	277249	275623	SPBC216.01c	SPCC11E10.08	psy2	rik1	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783434328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790186	2540726	2538961	277249	275535	SPBC216.01c	SPCC285.14	psy2	trs130	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.273017407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790187	2540726	2543617	277249	280031	SPBC216.01c	SPAC4A8.10	psy2	SPAC4A8.10	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4991583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790188	2540726	2543637	277249	280051	SPBC216.01c	SPAC3H8.02	psy2	csr102	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775066531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790189	2540726	2540131	277249	276668	SPBC216.01c	SPBC1778.05c	psy2	SPBC1778.05c	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.614921568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790190	2540726	2541633	277249	278129	SPBC216.01c	SPAC664.01c	psy2	swi6	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.185068258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790191	2540726	2540686	277249	277211	SPBC216.01c	SPBC21D10.10	psy2	bdc1	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.56627522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790192	2540726	2542701	277249	279154	SPBC216.01c	SPAC26H5.05	psy2	mga2	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.007245867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790193	2540726	2538922	277249	275499	SPBC216.01c	SPCC16C4.10	psy2	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582213181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790194	2540726	2542103	277249	278579	SPBC216.01c	SPAC31G5.11	psy2	pac2	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.814533918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790195	2540726	3361375	277249	280451	SPBC216.01c	SPAC212.06c	psy2	SPAC212.06c	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780762366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790196	2540726	2539420	277249	275985	SPBC216.01c	SPCC970.07c	psy2	raf2	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.901874156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790197	2540726	2542107	277249	278583	SPBC216.01c	SPAC30.01c	psy2	sec72	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	sec7b|sec702	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.899062838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790198	2540726	2541208	277249	277722	SPBC216.01c	SPBC887.04c	psy2	lub1	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320336459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790199	2540726	2542677	277249	279130	SPBC216.01c	SPAC26F1.10c	psy2	pyp1	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633606541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790200	2540726	2539913	277249	276457	SPBC216.01c	SPBC11G11.03	psy2	mrt4	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817450261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790201	2540726	2539463	277249	276026	SPBC216.01c	SPCC550.11	psy2	SPCC550.11	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.637247365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790202	2540726	2543681	277249	280095	SPBC216.01c	SPAC9.02c	psy2	SPAC9.02c	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318554407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790203	2540726	2542724	277249	279175	SPBC216.01c	SPAC767.01c	psy2	vps1	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580690451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790204	2540726	2539249	277249	275819	SPBC216.01c	SPCC1450.05c	psy2	rox3	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	med19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934967542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790205	2540726	2540919	277249	277435	SPBC216.01c	SPBC543.07	psy2	pek1	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	mkk1|skh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634442569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790206	2540726	2539935	277249	276479	SPBC216.01c	SPBC13G1.04c	psy2	abh1	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	SPBC13G1.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808101575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790207	2540726	2542182	277249	278657	SPBC216.01c	SPAC19B12.08	psy2	atg4	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776247569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790208	2540726	2541527	277249	278027	SPBC216.01c	SPAC31A2.09c	psy2	apm4	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388194334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790209	2540726	2540263	277249	276794	SPBC216.01c	SPBC32H8.02c	psy2	nep2	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	mug120|pi021|SPACTOKYO_453.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.264421324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790210	2540726	2543641	277249	280055	SPBC216.01c	SPAC3H5.08c	psy2	SPAC3H5.08c	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.063833971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790211	2540726	2541522	277249	278023	SPBC216.01c	SPAC23E2.01	psy2	fep1	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.937771348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790212	2540726	2538972	277249	275546	SPBC216.01c	SPCC1739.15	psy2	wtf21	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	wtf3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639973376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790213	2540726	2540964	277249	277480	SPBC216.01c	SPBC365.16	psy2	SPBC365.16	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.326557299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790214	2540726	2539051	277249	275624	SPBC216.01c	SPCC1183.11	psy2	msy1	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.518452017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790215	2540726	2540797	277249	277316	SPBC216.01c	SPBC18H10.11c	psy2	ppr2	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439499985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790216	2540726	2542513	277249	278971	SPBC216.01c	SPAC1952.05	psy2	gcn5	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.812781563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790217	2540726	2543412	277249	279834	SPBC216.01c	SPAC637.07	psy2	moe1	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.558801241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790218	2540726	2541496	277249	277998	SPBC216.01c	SPAC23D3.09	psy2	arp42	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.322729059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790219	2540726	2538826	277249	275407	SPBC216.01c	SPCC1442.16c	psy2	zta1	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	SPCC285.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097975945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790220	2540726	2540086	277249	276624	SPBC216.01c	SPBC16H5.12c	psy2	SPBC16H5.12c	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.565527835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790221	2540726	2540326	277249	276856	SPBC216.01c	SPBC2G5.06c	psy2	hmt2	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.561110506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790222	2540726	2540261	277249	276792	SPBC216.01c	SPBC543.05c	psy2	SPBC543.05c	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.853243731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790223	2540726	2539974	277249	276518	SPBC216.01c	SPBC32H8.07	psy2	git5	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454594449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790224	2540726	2541903	277249	278393	SPBC216.01c	SPAC22F8.05	psy2	SPAC22F8.05	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.915836438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790225	2540726	2540836	277249	277354	SPBC216.01c	SPBC18H10.19	psy2	vps38	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509302906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790226	2540726	2542549	277249	279006	SPBC216.01c	SPAC19A8.11c	psy2	SPAC19A8.11c	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.831731115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790227	2540726	2539402	277249	275967	SPBC216.01c	SPCC613.03	psy2	SPCC613.03	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569008359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790228	2540726	2542597	277249	279051	SPBC216.01c	SPAP8A3.07c	psy2	SPAP8A3.07c	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.914815946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790229	2540726	2538690	277249	275275	SPBC216.01c	SPCC1393.05	psy2	ers1	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636439688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790230	2540726	2538848	277249	275429	SPBC216.01c	SPCC613.12c	psy2	raf1	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.488764139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790231	2540726	2540643	277249	277168	SPBC216.01c	SPBC19G7.06	psy2	mbx1	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.977763835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790232	2540726	2542875	277249	279320	SPBC216.01c	SPAC13G7.02c	psy2	ssa1	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.319431194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790233	2540726	2540001	277249	276545	SPBC216.01c	SPBC1289.13c	psy2	gmh6	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.628915977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790234	2540726	2539160	277249	275732	SPBC216.01c	SPCC18.17c	psy2	SPCC18.17c	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.900213481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790235	2540726	2539354	277249	275920	SPBC216.01c	SPCC4F11.03c	psy2	SPCC4F11.03c	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.617063018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790236	2540726	2541909	277249	278399	SPBC216.01c	SPAC227.01c	psy2	erd1	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.624058271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790237	2540726	2542881	277249	279326	SPBC216.01c	SPAC13F5.03c	psy2	gld1	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.022457629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790238	2540726	2540814	277249	277333	SPBC216.01c	SPBC4B4.10c	psy2	atg5	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	mug77	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385924966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790239	2540726	2539159	277249	275731	SPBC216.01c	SPCC1235.01	psy2	SPCC1235.01	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	SPCC320.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.772907988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790240	2540726	2541425	277249	277930	SPBC216.01c	SPAC2C4.17c	psy2	msy2	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	SPAC2C4.17c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.543658745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790241	2540726	2540677	277249	277202	SPBC216.01c	SPBC21B10.03c	psy2	ath1	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711544523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790242	2540726	2539729	277249	276281	SPBC216.01c	SPBC11B10.07c	psy2	ivn1	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	pi004|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.196242916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790243	2540726	2540516	277249	277044	SPBC216.01c	SPBC21C3.01c	psy2	vps13a	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.054906661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790244	2540726	2539189	277249	275760	SPBC216.01c	SPCC1682.16	psy2	rpt4	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.700665687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790245	2540726	2542244	277249	278714	SPBC216.01c	SPAC19G12.13c	psy2	poz1	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810011254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790246	2540726	2542424	277249	278886	SPBC216.01c	SPAC1805.14	psy2	SPAC1805.14	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.191398739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790247	2540726	2542700	277249	279153	SPBC216.01c	SPAC26H5.08c	psy2	bgl2	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.131926672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790248	2540726	2540734	277249	277257	SPBC216.01c	SPBC19G7.09	psy2	ulp1	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.057509133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790249	2542144	2542268	278620	278737	SPAC6F6.17	SPAC17A5.07c	rif1	ulp2	SPAPJ736.01|tap1|tap11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.963665433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790250	2542144	2542177	278620	278652	SPAC6F6.17	SPAC17H9.08	rif1	SPAC17H9.08	SPAPJ736.01|tap1|tap11	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.956956192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790251	2542144	2541488	278620	277990	SPAC6F6.17	SPAC227.17c	rif1	SPAC227.17c	SPAPJ736.01|tap1|tap11	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.609739756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790252	2540436	2538939	276964	275514	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC1672.04c	ngg1	SPCC1672.04c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445543136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790253	2540436	2542072	276964	278549	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAP32A8.03c	ngg1	bop1	ada3|kap1	SPAP32A8.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.206219233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790254	2540436	2542207	276964	278682	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC17H9.10c	ngg1	ddb1	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580794727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790255	2540436	2543497	276964	279916	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC926.09c	ngg1	fas1	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819259341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790256	2540436	2542895	276964	279339	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC13G6.10c	ngg1	asl1	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.120744331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790257	2540436	2542862	276964	279308	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC140.03	ngg1	arb1	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.138324439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790258	2540436	2538961	276964	275535	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC285.14	ngg1	trs130	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.809978217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790259	2540436	2542577	276964	279033	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC19G12.15c	ngg1	tpp1	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.02103146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790260	2540436	2542598	276964	279052	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC6G10.08	ngg1	idp1	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.561692732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790261	2540436	2542080	276964	278557	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC27D7.03c	ngg1	mei2	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.619383613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790262	2540436	2542382	276964	278846	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC6G10.06	ngg1	SPAC6G10.06	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994724846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790263	2540436	2541343	276964	277854	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBPB2B2.19c	ngg1	SPBPB2B2.19c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.375969702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790264	2540436	2540913	276964	277429	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC56F2.08c	ngg1	SPBC56F2.08c	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869156741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790265	2540436	2543152	276964	279584	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC869.03c	ngg1	SPAC869.03c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323275968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790266	2540436	2542812	276964	279259	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC6F6.01	ngg1	cch1	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.558709177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790267	2540436	2541912	276964	278402	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC222.16c	ngg1	csn3	ada3|kap1	SPAC821.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.917010203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790268	2540436	2542127	276964	278603	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC1952.12c	ngg1	csn71	ada3|kap1	csn7|csn7a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.912057031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790269	2540436	2543064	276964	279497	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC3G6.01	ngg1	hrp3	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.50555239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790270	2540436	2542671	276964	279124	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC824.09c	ngg1	SPAC824.09c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.202349599	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790271	2540436	2540131	276964	276668	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC1778.05c	ngg1	SPBC1778.05c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.263709806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790272	2540436	2542293	276964	278761	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC17G8.14c	ngg1	pck1	ada3|kap1	SPAC22H10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.077932435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790273	2540436	2542378	276964	278842	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC1805.04	ngg1	nup132	ada3|kap1	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380553245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790274	2540436	2538993	276964	275567	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC162.12	ngg1	tco89	ada3|kap1	SPCC1753.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.332608872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790275	2540436	2538896	276964	275474	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC584.11c	ngg1	SPCC584.11c	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.132245699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790276	2540436	2539930	276964	276474	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC1198.11c	ngg1	reb1	ada3|kap1	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.749223022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790277	2540436	2540068	276964	276606	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC1734.12c	ngg1	alg12	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.870478658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790278	2540436	2541117	276964	277632	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC646.13	ngg1	sds23	ada3|kap1	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.97614923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790279	2540436	2540161	276964	276696	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC13E7.03c	ngg1	SPBC13E7.03c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.965003812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790280	2540436	2539196	276964	275767	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC1795.03	ngg1	gms1	ada3|kap1	gmn3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814820634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790281	2540436	5802967	276964	858105	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC20G4.08	ngg1	pdc1	ada3|kap1	SPAC20G4.08|SPAC4F10.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814431774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790282	2540436	2542492	276964	278951	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC1B9.02c	ngg1	sck1	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.441367953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790283	2540436	2543434	276964	279854	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC8F11.02c	ngg1	dph3	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704230832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790284	2540436	2540686	276964	277211	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC21D10.10	ngg1	bdc1	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.809449744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790285	2540436	2539201	276964	275772	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC188.09c	ngg1	pfl4	ada3|kap1	SPCC188.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.27135574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790286	2540436	2542701	276964	279154	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC26H5.05	ngg1	mga2	ada3|kap1	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.823562967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790287	2540436	2542103	276964	278579	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC31G5.11	ngg1	pac2	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.011197996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790288	2540436	2542892	276964	279336	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC13F5.04c	ngg1	vta1	ada3|kap1	SPAC13F5.04c|new6|SPAC13F5.08|vts1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992396578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790289	2540436	2543320	276964	279744	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAPJ695.01c	ngg1	SPAPJ695.01c	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.409340169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790290	2540436	2543098	276964	279530	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC4A8.06c	ngg1	SPAC4A8.06c	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8166408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790291	2540436	2540975	276964	277491	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC354.12	ngg1	gpd3	ada3|kap1	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.625846942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790292	2540436	2542468	276964	278929	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC1D4.09c	ngg1	rtf2	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.849516579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790293	2540436	2542107	276964	278583	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC30.01c	ngg1	sec72	ada3|kap1	sec7b|sec702	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.020980836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790294	2540436	2542677	276964	279130	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC26F1.10c	ngg1	pyp1	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979374433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790295	2540436	2538847	276964	275428	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC594.06c	ngg1	SPCC594.06c	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143086706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790296	2540436	2539510	276964	276072	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC4G3.04c	ngg1	coq5	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504062931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790297	2540436	2542816	276964	279263	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC4G8.11c	ngg1	atp10	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.251339001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790298	2540436	2539564	276964	276125	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC550.12	ngg1	arp6	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815130101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790299	2540436	2539463	276964	276026	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC550.11	ngg1	SPCC550.11	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568137629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790300	2540436	2543230	276964	279658	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC823.13c	ngg1	SPAC823.13c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.6373224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790301	2540436	2543043	276964	279478	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC3F10.13	ngg1	ucp6	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.262360649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790302	2540436	2538801	276964	275382	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC285.13c	ngg1	nup60	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.005106263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790303	2540436	2542724	276964	279175	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC767.01c	ngg1	vps1	ada3|kap1	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.694598005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790304	2540436	2541026	276964	277541	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC337.09	ngg1	erg28	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.048302478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790305	2540436	2539797	276964	276347	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC16G5.14c	ngg1	rps3	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.13513786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790306	2540436	2539575	276964	276135	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCP20C8.02c	ngg1	SPCP20C8.02c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446172721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790307	2540436	2543048	276964	279483	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC3F10.02c	ngg1	trk1	ada3|kap1	sptrk	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193025724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790308	2540436	2539937	276964	276481	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC1539.08	ngg1	arf6	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.477892301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790309	2540436	2542012	276964	278495	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC23C11.02c	ngg1	rps23	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.274546629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790310	2540436	2539988	276964	276532	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC1271.05c	ngg1	SPBC1271.05c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.908795071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790311	2540436	2541346	276964	277857	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBP8B7.08c	ngg1	ppm1	ada3|kap1	SPBP8B7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.98564075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790312	2540436	2540993	276964	277509	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC342.01c	ngg1	alg6	ada3|kap1	SPBC3F6.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.200836072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790313	2540436	2542022	276964	278505	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC23A1.03	ngg1	apt1	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.843768774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790314	2540436	2541424	276964	277929	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC23G3.04	ngg1	ies4	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.150235949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790315	2540436	2541560	276964	278059	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC24B11.12c	ngg1	SPAC24B11.12c	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.8093787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790316	2540436	2542277	276964	278746	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC17A5.02c	ngg1	dbr1	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.516756066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790317	2540436	2539792	276964	276342	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC1271.14	ngg1	SPBC1271.14	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322700831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790318	2540436	2540467	276964	276995	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC2G2.07c	ngg1	mug178	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576550277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790319	2540436	2542698	276964	279151	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC26H5.09c	ngg1	SPAC26H5.09c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570121145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790320	2540436	2543108	276964	279540	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC3A12.13c	ngg1	SPAC3A12.13c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776494369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790321	2540436	2543641	276964	280055	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC3H5.08c	ngg1	SPAC3H5.08c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569919963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790322	2540436	2539244	276964	275814	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC1672.06c	ngg1	asp1	ada3|kap1	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569495954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790323	2540436	2543426	276964	279846	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC631.02	ngg1	bdf2	ada3|kap1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.291957974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790324	2540436	2541905	276964	278395	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC6G9.01c	ngg1	SPAC6G9.01c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386145841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790325	2540436	2539352	276964	275918	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC188.07	ngg1	ccq1	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568652746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790326	2540436	2542373	276964	278837	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC1805.06c	ngg1	hem2	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.924874391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790327	2540436	2542530	276964	278988	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC1399.02	ngg1	SPAC1399.02	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380222458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790328	2540436	2541489	276964	277991	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC23D3.11	ngg1	ayr1	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.135059422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790329	2540436	2538972	276964	275546	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC1739.15	ngg1	wtf21	ada3|kap1	wtf3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515529918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790330	2540436	2538906	276964	275483	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC1259.03	ngg1	rpa12	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.307883573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790331	2540436	2542253	276964	278723	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC17H9.04c	ngg1	SPAC17H9.04c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.689675818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790332	2540436	2542981	276964	279419	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC824.02	ngg1	bst1	ada3|kap1	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.259904715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790333	2540436	2539478	276964	276041	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC550.07	ngg1	SPCC550.07	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.128003853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790334	2540436	2540825	276964	277343	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC428.08c	ngg1	clr4	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767870488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790335	2540436	2540893	276964	277409	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC543.10	ngg1	get1	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.871596361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790336	2540436	2540964	276964	277480	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC365.16	ngg1	SPBC365.16	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.073725392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790337	2540436	2539310	276964	275877	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC285.17	ngg1	spp27	ada3|kap1	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515127653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790338	2540436	2542331	276964	278797	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC1834.05	ngg1	alg9	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.710894129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790339	2540436	2541544	276964	278044	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC22G7.06c	ngg1	ura1	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866196931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790340	2540436	2539098	276964	275670	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC24B10.18	ngg1	SPCC24B10.18	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193234339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790341	2540436	2539388	276964	275953	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC24B10.12	ngg1	cgi121	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.770610996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790342	2540436	2542311	276964	278777	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC16A10.05c	ngg1	dad1	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.10831068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790343	2540436	2539804	276964	276354	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC1105.11c	ngg1	hht3	ada3|kap1	h3.3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.557236247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790344	2540436	2542596	276964	279050	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC1B3.17	ngg1	clr2	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852956516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790345	2540436	2539003	276964	275577	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC1442.17c	ngg1	ist1	ada3|kap1	SPCC285.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.346093703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790346	2540436	2541800	276964	278291	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC732.02c	ngg1	SPAC732.02c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.326565724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790347	2540436	2541093	276964	277608	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC646.08c	ngg1	SPBC646.08c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451172716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790348	2540436	2543144	276964	279576	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC3F10.05c	ngg1	mug113	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.202971326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790349	2540436	2541545	276964	278045	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC22F8.07c	ngg1	rtf1	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036259662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790350	2540436	2538770	276964	275353	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC1753.02c	ngg1	git3	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.145789473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790351	2540436	2539340	276964	275906	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC1906.04	ngg1	wtf20	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63537748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790352	2540436	2539628	276964	276185	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC1604.03c	ngg1	SPBC1604.03c	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201680501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790353	2540436	2542776	276964	279225	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC167.01	ngg1	ire1	ada3|kap1	ppk4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.879530682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790354	2540436	2540922	276964	277438	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC36.10	ngg1	SPBC36.10	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326405898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790355	2540436	2539990	276964	276534	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC1289.14	ngg1	SPBC1289.14	ada3|kap1	SPBC8E4.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.133736774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790356	2540436	2542123	276964	278599	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC18G6.15	ngg1	mal3	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639891243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790357	2540436	2542507	276964	278965	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC18G6.13	ngg1	SPAC18G6.13	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818663058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790358	2540436	2541543	276964	278043	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC5H10.04	ngg1	SPAC5H10.04	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.564964421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790359	2540436	2540352	276964	276881	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC215.03c	ngg1	csn1	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.057804156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790360	2540436	2542971	276964	279410	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC105.02c	ngg1	SPAC105.02c	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873371147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790361	2540436	2540886	276964	277403	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC4F6.10	ngg1	vps901	ada3|kap1	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51237644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790362	2540436	2540543	276964	277070	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC29A10.06c	ngg1	ely5	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.325747978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790363	2540436	2542168	276964	278643	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC17A5.16	ngg1	ftp105	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.794023316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790364	2540436	2542989	276964	279427	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC11E3.13c	ngg1	gas5	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323315643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790365	2540436	2539484	276964	276047	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC594.04c	ngg1	SPCC594.04c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647897434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790366	2540436	2541701	276964	278197	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC1296.03c	ngg1	sxa2	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036128839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790367	2540436	2542469	276964	278930	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC19A8.04	ngg1	erg5	ada3|kap1	cyp61	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.618755849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790368	2540436	2542522	276964	278980	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC19A8.03	ngg1	ymr1	ada3|kap1	SPAC19A8.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.919854556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790369	2540436	2543313	276964	279737	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAPJ691.03	ngg1	SPAPJ691.03	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.6270838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790370	2540436	2539603	276964	276161	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC1289.06c	ngg1	ppr8	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.164285189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790371	2540436	2539689	276964	276244	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC1861.03	ngg1	mak10	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.338063052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790372	2540436	2541929	276964	278417	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC23C4.12	ngg1	hhp2	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.300821407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790373	2540436	2543245	276964	279673	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC56F8.06c	ngg1	alg10	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842401214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790374	2540436	2539857	276964	276404	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC1604.20c	ngg1	tea2	ada3|kap1	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.68115408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790375	2540436	2541413	276964	277921	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBPJ4664.06	ngg1	gpt1	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986911707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790376	2540436	2543643	276964	280057	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC3G9.07c	ngg1	hos2	ada3|kap1	hda1|phd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.822927427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790377	2540436	2538852	276964	275433	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC4E9.01c	ngg1	rec11	ada3|kap1	SPCC550.16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.76294441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790378	2540436	2543396	276964	279818	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC4D7.11	ngg1	dsc4	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.469061967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790379	2540436	2539284	276964	275852	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC584.15c	ngg1	SPCC584.15c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.33411547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790380	2540436	2540326	276964	276856	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC2G5.06c	ngg1	hmt2	ada3|kap1	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.746637695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790381	2540436	2538769	276964	275352	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC126.04c	ngg1	sgf73	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.087807282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790382	2540436	2538774	276964	275356	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC162.06c	ngg1	SPCC162.06c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703082981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790383	2540436	2542946	276964	279386	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC6F12.03c	ngg1	fsv1	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.536308315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790384	2540436	2542976	276964	279414	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC9E9.09c	ngg1	atd1	ada3|kap1	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505344181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790385	2540436	2538880	276964	275459	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC1393.09c	ngg1	SPCC1393.09c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.621633157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790386	2540436	2539850	276964	276398	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC15D4.07c	ngg1	atg9	ada3|kap1	apg9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922317433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790387	2540436	2539224	276964	275794	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC16A11.01	ngg1	SPCC16A11.01	ada3|kap1	SPCC63.15	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.84240494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790388	2540436	2541720	276964	278214	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC23H3.13c	ngg1	gpa2	ada3|kap1	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64787074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790389	2540436	2540107	276964	276644	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC106.08c	ngg1	mug2	ada3|kap1	B13958-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.006684546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790390	2540436	2543495	276964	279914	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC513.03	ngg1	mfm2	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.405885807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790391	2540436	2540077	276964	276615	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC17D11.04c	ngg1	nto1	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.343503372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790392	2540436	2542254	276964	278724	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC30D11.04c	ngg1	nup124	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.981007574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790393	2540436	2540374	276964	276903	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC31F10.02	ngg1	SPBC31F10.02	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.063288393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790394	2540436	2542549	276964	279006	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC19A8.11c	ngg1	SPAC19A8.11c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.338459504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790395	2540436	2539408	276964	275973	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC576.12c	ngg1	mhf2	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.204179168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790396	2540436	2538767	276964	275350	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC1672.12c	ngg1	get4	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.137592904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790397	2540436	2541009	276964	277524	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC428.04	ngg1	apq12	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866790749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790398	2540436	5802861	276964	857999	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC1D4.01	ngg1	tls1	ada3|kap1	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.572041915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790399	2540436	2540990	276964	277506	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC36B7.06c	ngg1	mug20	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143391466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790400	2540436	2543443	276964	279863	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC3H1.12c	ngg1	snt2	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.346543605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790401	2540436	2543119	276964	279551	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC3A11.07	ngg1	nde2	ada3|kap1	SPAC3A11.07	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.687509783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790402	2540436	2543561	276964	279977	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC922.04	ngg1	SPAC922.04	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925825937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790403	2540436	2538780	276964	275361	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC1840.07c	ngg1	SPCC1840.07c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.571062104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790404	2540436	2541708	276964	278203	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC31A2.02	ngg1	trm112	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.192632121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790405	2540436	2540342	276964	276871	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC2G2.01c	ngg1	liz1	ada3|kap1	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.059531513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790406	2540436	2541053	276964	277568	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC56F2.10c	ngg1	alg5	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.327788325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790407	2540436	2540967	276964	277483	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC36B7.08c	ngg1	SPBC36B7.08c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447319799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790408	2540436	2539427	276964	275992	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC663.15c	ngg1	SPCC663.15c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.945934637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790409	2540436	2539344	276964	275910	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC1672.09	ngg1	SPCC1672.09	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86489999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790410	2540436	2540229	276964	276761	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC31F10.15c	ngg1	atp15	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.127301651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790411	2540436	2541927	276964	278415	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC222.12c	ngg1	atp2	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.817405595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790412	2540436	2538884	276964	275462	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC1393.08	ngg1	SPCC1393.08	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.904075211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790413	2540436	2541488	276964	277990	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC227.17c	ngg1	SPAC227.17c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.431170764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790414	2540436	2543477	276964	279897	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAPB2B4.04c	ngg1	SPAPB2B4.04c	ada3|kap1	pmc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.867471404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790415	2540436	2543011	276964	279449	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC10F6.11c	ngg1	atg17	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809450815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790416	2540436	2540930	276964	277446	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC354.10	ngg1	def1	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.166183585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790417	2540436	2539519	276964	276081	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC364.05	ngg1	vps3	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.172323324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790418	2540436	2542602	276964	279056	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC186.09	ngg1	SPAC186.09	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701328517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790419	2540436	2541742	276964	278236	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC22H10.09	ngg1	SPAC22H10.09	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.188641295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790420	2540436	2538848	276964	275429	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC613.12c	ngg1	raf1	ada3|kap1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256312449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790421	2540436	2541896	276964	278386	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC23H4.16c	ngg1	SPAC23H4.16c	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874553384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790422	2540436	3361520	276964	280596	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC1610.02c	ngg1	SPAC1610.02c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.185059297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790423	2540436	2542673	276964	279126	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC26A3.11	ngg1	SPAC26A3.11	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.947353466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790424	2540436	2541762	276964	278256	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC139.01c	ngg1	SPAC139.01c	ada3|kap1	SPAC955.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.204226468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790425	2540436	2540821	276964	277339	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC800.03	ngg1	clr3	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.503454769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790426	2540436	2542170	276964	278645	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC17G8.13c	ngg1	mst2	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.116512115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790427	2540436	2539706	276964	276259	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC16G5.13	ngg1	ptf2	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.096776316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790428	2540436	2540910	276964	277426	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC577.02	ngg1	rpl3801	ada3|kap1	rpl38-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506242697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790429	2540436	2542198	276964	278673	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC6F12.09	ngg1	rdp1	ada3|kap1	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.263210703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790430	2540436	2539160	276964	275732	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC18.17c	ngg1	SPCC18.17c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.770506987	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790431	2540436	2539354	276964	275920	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC4F11.03c	ngg1	SPCC4F11.03c	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.260141091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790432	2540436	2543628	276964	280042	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC3H8.10	ngg1	spo20	ada3|kap1	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.205942332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790433	2540436	2541909	276964	278399	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC227.01c	ngg1	erd1	ada3|kap1	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385544689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790434	2540436	2542883	276964	279328	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC1486.04c	ngg1	alm1	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988038176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790435	2540436	2542881	276964	279326	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC13F5.03c	ngg1	gld1	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.755293073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790436	2540436	2542915	276964	279357	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC6C3.06c	ngg1	SPAC6C3.06c	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152830946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790437	2540436	2543267	276964	279695	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC1002.12c	ngg1	SPAC1002.12c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.070285293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790438	2540436	2539030	276964	275603	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCP1E11.02	ngg1	ppk38	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.718376796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790439	2540436	2538717	276964	275301	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC1235.02	ngg1	bio2	ada3|kap1	SPCC320.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504389105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790440	2540436	2541279	276964	277792	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC8E4.03	ngg1	SPBC8E4.03	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328582462	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790441	2540436	2541358	276964	277869	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBP4H10.16c	ngg1	SPBP4H10.16c	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819125367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790442	2540436	2541432	276964	277937	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC1F5.05c	ngg1	mso1	ada3|kap1	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.443659432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790443	2540436	2538756	276964	275339	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC1795.10c	ngg1	SPCC1795.10c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.646692732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790444	2540436	2541531	276964	278031	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC25A8.01c	ngg1	fft3	ada3|kap1	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.699213301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790445	2540436	2540829	276964	277347	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC800.09	ngg1	sum2	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868019268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790446	2540436	2540164	276964	276699	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC1683.03c	ngg1	SPBC1683.03c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.566460403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790447	2540436	2538692	276964	275277	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC162.04c	ngg1	wtf13	ada3|kap1	wtf12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445630933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790448	2540436	2540345	276964	276874	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC19C7.09c	ngg1	uve1	ada3|kap1	uvde	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095822335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790449	2540436	2543439	276964	279859	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAPB1A10.13	ngg1	SPAPB1A10.13	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508945543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790450	2540436	2542222	276964	278695	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC31G5.18c	ngg1	sde2	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038106331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790451	2540436	2541380	276964	277891	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBPB2B2.13	ngg1	gal1	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093765057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790452	2540436	2543602	276964	280017	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAPB1A11.04c	ngg1	mca1	ada3|kap1	SPAPB1A11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.044265049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790453	2540436	2540516	276964	277044	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC21C3.01c	ngg1	vps13a	ada3|kap1	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.330402153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790454	2540436	2542635	276964	279089	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC24H6.09	ngg1	gef1	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381586238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790455	2540436	2542416	276964	278880	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC589.03c	ngg1	SPAC589.03c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645537842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790456	2540436	2540992	276964	277508	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC342.05	ngg1	crb2	ada3|kap1	rhp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388066048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790457	2540436	2541115	276964	277630	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC660.07	ngg1	ntp1	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.127756848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790458	2540436	2539207	276964	275777	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC285.09c	ngg1	cgs2	ada3|kap1	pde1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.749395054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790459	2540436	2542442	276964	278904	SPBC28F2.10c	SPACUNK12.02c	ngg1	cmk1	ada3|kap1	CaMK-I|SPAC25D11.02C	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.916895329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790460	2540436	2540140	276964	276677	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC16C6.08c	ngg1	qcr6	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.328392023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790461	2540436	2539189	276964	275760	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC1682.16	ngg1	rpt4	ada3|kap1	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.21162065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790462	2540436	2542021	276964	278504	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAP14E8.02	ngg1	tos4	ada3|kap1	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.689552938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790463	2540436	2541238	276964	277752	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC8E4.05c	ngg1	SPBC8E4.05c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.490598502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790464	2540436	2542716	276964	279169	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC25H1.07	ngg1	emc1	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195046795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790465	2540436	2543220	276964	279648	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAPB21F2.02	ngg1	SPAPB21F2.02	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.448162312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790466	2540436	2539700	276964	276253	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC1685.15c	ngg1	klp6	ada3|kap1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.561922301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790467	2540436	2541806	276964	278297	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC4G8.13c	ngg1	prz1	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647871407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790468	2540436	2543387	276964	279809	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAPB1E7.02c	ngg1	mcl1	ada3|kap1	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.342653184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790469	2540436	2543327	276964	279750	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC1D4.06c	ngg1	csk1	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.880425082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790470	2540436	2541627	276964	278123	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC1F5.08c	ngg1	yam8	ada3|kap1	ehs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507724527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790471	2540436	2543471	276964	279891	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC513.07	ngg1	SPAC513.07	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441861238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790472	2540436	2540173	276964	276706	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC106.13	ngg1	SPBC106.13	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.901888259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790473	2540436	2543087	276964	279520	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC30C2.04	ngg1	SPAC30C2.04	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.557969139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790474	2540436	2539014	276964	275587	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC18B5.05c	ngg1	SPCC18B5.05c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.141604619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790475	2540436	2540360	276964	276889	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC2G5.01	ngg1	SPBC2G5.01	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.690231246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790476	2540436	2540093	276964	276631	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC115.02c	ngg1	afg1	ada3|kap1	SPBC115.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.02668927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790477	2540436	2543372	276964	279794	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAPB1A10.09	ngg1	ase1	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.942110137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790478	2540436	2543333	276964	279756	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC694.02	ngg1	SPAC694.02	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.120199241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790479	2540436	2542440	276964	278902	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC17A2.12	ngg1	rrp1	ada3|kap1	SPAC17A2.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.273273096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790480	2540436	2540067	276964	276605	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC16H5.05c	ngg1	cyp7	ada3|kap1	cwf27	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988003218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790481	2540436	2542943	276964	279384	SPBC28F2.10c	SPBC1348.03	ngg1	SPBC1348.03	ada3|kap1	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.278465818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790482	2540436	2542073	276964	278550	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC26F1.01	ngg1	sec74	ada3|kap1	SPAPJ691.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441273303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790483	2540436	2542680	276964	279133	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC26F1.09	ngg1	gyp51	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504707118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790484	2540436	2542617	276964	279071	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC13A11.01c	ngg1	rga8	ada3|kap1	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.123391359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790485	2540436	2541875	276964	278365	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC22F3.06c	ngg1	lon1	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.180377718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790486	2540436	2542836	276964	279282	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC13G7.06	ngg1	met16	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640073661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790487	2540436	2542879	276964	279324	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC13G7.07	ngg1	arb2	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317649328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790488	2540436	2539033	276964	275606	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC1450.07c	ngg1	dao1	ada3|kap1	SPCC1450.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570918061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790489	2540436	2539001	276964	275575	SPBC28F2.10c	SPCC1494.08c	ngg1	SPCC1494.08c	ada3|kap1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439659361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790490	2540436	2542208	276964	278683	SPBC28F2.10c	SPAC17G8.08c	ngg1	SPAC17G8.08c	ada3|kap1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.334395732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790491	2542688	2540161	279141	276696	SPAC25B8.01	SPBC13E7.03c	dap1	SPBC13E7.03c	SPAC26H5.15	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.272257946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790492	2542688	2542689	279141	279142	SPAC25B8.01	SPAC29B12.04	dap1	snz1	SPAC26H5.15	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.3987139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790493	2542688	2541464	279141	277966	SPAC25B8.01	SPAC222.08c	dap1	SPAC222.08c	SPAC26H5.15	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.489081913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790494	2542688	2540930	279141	277446	SPAC25B8.01	SPBC354.10	dap1	def1	SPAC26H5.15	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983169045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790495	2542688	2542759	279141	279209	SPAC25B8.01	SPAC9G1.07	dap1	SPAC9G1.07	SPAC26H5.15	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.910793107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790496	2542688	2538762	279141	275345	SPAC25B8.01	SPCC306.04c	dap1	set1	SPAC26H5.15	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852468703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790497	2542660	2539147	279113	275719	SPAC328.03	SPCC622.12c	tps1	gdh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.214689991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790498	2542660	2542895	279113	279339	SPAC328.03	SPAC13G6.10c	tps1	asl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842425096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790499	2542660	2542577	279113	279033	SPAC328.03	SPAC19G12.15c	tps1	tpp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815737508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790500	2542660	2540913	279113	277429	SPAC328.03	SPBC56F2.08c	tps1	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.895159168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790501	2542660	2543152	279113	279584	SPAC328.03	SPAC869.03c	tps1	SPAC869.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.509590072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790502	2542660	2538977	279113	275551	SPAC328.03	SPCC1020.06c	tps1	tal1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868199067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790503	2542660	2539156	279113	275728	SPAC328.03	SPCC1450.08c	tps1	wtf16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711235323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790504	2542660	2539068	279113	275640	SPAC328.03	SPCC1442.11c	tps1	SPCC1442.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454961482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790505	2542660	2543201	279113	279630	SPAC328.03	SPAC3F10.15c	tps1	spo12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.594549492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790506	2542660	5802945	279113	858083	SPAC328.03	SPAC19G12.16c	tps1	adg2	-	SPAC23A1.01c|mug46	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443719862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790507	2542660	2542103	279113	278579	SPAC328.03	SPAC31G5.11	tps1	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.233773102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790508	2542660	2539263	279113	275833	SPAC328.03	SPCC895.09c	tps1	ucp12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.07675405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790509	2542660	2540535	279113	277062	SPAC328.03	SPBC215.01	tps1	SPBC215.01	-	SPBC3B9.20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781457388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790510	2542660	2540979	279113	277495	SPAC328.03	SPBC3H7.10	tps1	elp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.853644305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790511	2542660	2539463	279113	276026	SPAC328.03	SPCC550.11	tps1	SPCC550.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.598738595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790512	2542660	2542724	279113	279175	SPAC328.03	SPAC767.01c	tps1	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.010878372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790513	2542660	2540095	279113	276633	SPAC328.03	SPBC115.03	tps1	SPBC115.03	-	SPBC839.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.00666046	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790514	2542660	2541558	279113	278057	SPAC328.03	SPAC1F7.08	tps1	fio1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317779006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790515	2542660	2541323	279113	277835	SPAC328.03	SPBP35G2.14	tps1	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.187915192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790516	2542660	2541527	279113	278027	SPAC328.03	SPAC31A2.09c	tps1	apm4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.330090642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790517	2542660	2542277	279113	278746	SPAC328.03	SPAC17A5.02c	tps1	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.566225597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790518	2542660	2542220	279113	278694	SPAC328.03	SPAC1A6.03c	tps1	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.405408251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790519	2542660	2540663	279113	277188	SPAC328.03	SPBC56F2.06	tps1	mug147	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.025260965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790520	2542660	2541923	279113	278411	SPAC328.03	SPAC23C4.09c	tps1	SPAC23C4.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.685395098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790521	2542660	2542082	279113	278559	SPAC328.03	SPAC29B12.10c	tps1	pgt1	-	opt1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.970125729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790522	2542660	2543426	279113	279846	SPAC328.03	SPAC631.02	tps1	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.923852478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790523	2542660	2542640	279113	279094	SPAC328.03	SPAC9E9.12c	tps1	ybt1	-	abc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.384408598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790524	2542660	2540415	279113	276943	SPAC328.03	SPBC30B4.06c	tps1	SPBC30B4.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.806883396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790525	2542660	2538972	279113	275546	SPAC328.03	SPCC1739.15	tps1	wtf21	-	wtf3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.328875331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790526	2542660	2542791	279113	279240	SPAC328.03	SPAC167.04	tps1	pam17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.974695136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790527	2542660	2541844	279113	278335	SPAC328.03	SPAC22A12.17c	tps1	SPAC22A12.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.561583952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790528	2542660	2538821	279113	275402	SPAC328.03	SPCC584.01c	tps1	SPCC584.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.339949755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790529	2542660	2540797	279113	277316	SPAC328.03	SPBC18H10.11c	tps1	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.344093392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790530	2542660	2542507	279113	278965	SPAC328.03	SPAC18G6.13	tps1	SPAC18G6.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979373762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790531	2542660	2539046	279113	275619	SPAC328.03	SPCC1223.12c	tps1	meu10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7805801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790532	2542660	2540150	279113	276687	SPAC328.03	SPBC16E9.14c	tps1	zrg17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868328633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790533	2542660	2542464	279113	278925	SPAC328.03	SPAC1A6.09c	tps1	lag1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454904724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790534	2542660	2539073	279113	275645	SPAC328.03	SPCC1322.02	tps1	pxd1	-	SPCC1322.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390765665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790535	2542660	2542454	279113	278915	SPAC328.03	SPAC1399.01c	tps1	SPAC1399.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574864664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790536	2542660	2542989	279113	279427	SPAC328.03	SPAC11E3.13c	tps1	gas5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.121777968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790537	2542660	2539371	279113	275937	SPAC328.03	SPCC18B5.06	tps1	dom34	-	SPCC18B5.06|erf1|sup45	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.414614829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790538	2542660	2542921	279113	279362	SPAC328.03	SPAC1093.01	tps1	ppr5	-	SPAC12B10.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.923890586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790539	2542660	2542522	279113	278980	SPAC328.03	SPAC19A8.03	tps1	ymr1	-	SPAC19A8.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.477058657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790540	2542660	2540661	279113	277186	SPAC328.03	SPBC23E6.03c	tps1	nta1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.993414205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790541	2542660	2540256	279113	276787	SPAC328.03	SPBC32F12.12c	tps1	SPBC32F12.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382563534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790542	2542660	2539524	279113	276086	SPAC328.03	SPCC70.02c	tps1	SPCC70.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.70312295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790543	2542660	2542575	279113	279031	SPAC328.03	SPAC31G5.10	tps1	eta2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446008089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790544	2542660	2540836	279113	277354	SPAC328.03	SPBC18H10.19	tps1	vps38	-	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.33473079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790545	2542660	2538841	279113	275422	SPAC328.03	SPCC550.03c	tps1	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.210948558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790546	2542660	2538935	279113	275511	SPAC328.03	SPCC1682.11c	tps1	ctl1	-	SPCC1682.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.710482131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790547	2542660	2540318	279113	276848	SPAC328.03	SPBC30B4.04c	tps1	sol1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379081336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790548	2542660	2542549	279113	279006	SPAC328.03	SPAC19A8.11c	tps1	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641420224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790549	2542660	2540180	279113	276713	SPAC328.03	SPBC16D10.11c	tps1	rps1801	-	rps18-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.186781235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790550	2542660	2540184	279113	276717	SPAC328.03	SPBC106.12c	tps1	SPBC106.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.214383324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790551	2542660	2541296	279113	277808	SPAC328.03	SPBP8B7.06	tps1	rpp201	-	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.847738228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790552	2542660	2540357	279113	276886	SPAC328.03	SPBC2F12.05c	tps1	SPBC2F12.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.965498178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790553	2542660	2541793	279113	278284	SPAC328.03	SPAC22H10.02	tps1	SPAC22H10.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568963276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790554	2542660	2540643	279113	277168	SPAC328.03	SPBC19G7.06	tps1	mbx1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.053154144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790555	2542660	2542869	279113	279314	SPAC328.03	SPAC140.02	tps1	gar2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699343975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790556	2542660	2542875	279113	279320	SPAC328.03	SPAC13G7.02c	tps1	ssa1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.016071324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790557	2542660	2540001	279113	276545	SPAC328.03	SPBC1289.13c	tps1	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.190757478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790558	2542660	2542327	279113	278793	SPAC328.03	SPAC16C9.06c	tps1	upf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.102616733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790559	2542660	2539137	279113	275709	SPAC328.03	SPCC1682.08c	tps1	mcp2	-	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.5494927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790560	2542660	2543304	279113	279728	SPAC328.03	SPAC6B12.12	tps1	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.130543853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790561	2542660	2542940	279113	279381	SPAC328.03	SPAC31A2.12	tps1	SPAC31A2.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.137679326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790562	2542660	2541425	279113	277930	SPAC328.03	SPAC2C4.17c	tps1	msy2	-	SPAC2C4.17c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63617497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790563	2542660	2539029	279113	275602	SPAC328.03	SPCC61.05	tps1	SPCC61.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387155145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790564	2542660	2539136	279113	275708	SPAC328.03	SPCC1919.05	tps1	SPCC1919.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.249322598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790565	2542660	2543091	279113	279524	SPAC328.03	SPAC12G12.15	tps1	sif3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.129622447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790566	2542660	2540516	279113	277044	SPAC328.03	SPBC21C3.01c	tps1	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.868985001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790567	2542660	2543183	279113	279612	SPAC328.03	SPAC3A12.06c	tps1	SPAC3A12.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.907718537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790568	2542660	2539207	279113	275777	SPAC328.03	SPCC285.09c	tps1	cgs2	-	pde1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807227564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790569	2542660	2543380	279113	279802	SPAC328.03	SPAC4G9.16c	tps1	rpl901	-	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256603595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790570	2542660	2539189	279113	275760	SPAC328.03	SPCC1682.16	tps1	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.850497419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790571	2542660	2541084	279113	277599	SPAC328.03	SPBC649.02	tps1	rps1902	-	rps19|rps19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388418524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790572	2542660	2541238	279113	277752	SPAC328.03	SPBC8E4.05c	tps1	SPBC8E4.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509763135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790573	2542660	2541478	279113	277980	SPAC328.03	SPAC2F7.17	tps1	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982510253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790574	2542660	2542700	279113	279153	SPAC328.03	SPAC26H5.08c	tps1	bgl2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391322581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790575	2542660	2541491	279113	277993	SPAC328.03	SPAC2C4.16c	tps1	rps801	-	rps8|rps8-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.879220356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790576	2542660	2538947	279113	275521	SPAC328.03	SPCC1682.12c	tps1	ubp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505906361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790577	2542660	2540309	279113	276839	SPAC328.03	SPBC21B10.13c	tps1	yox1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197139564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790578	2542660	2540938	279113	277454	SPAC328.03	SPBC365.14c	tps1	uge1	-	gal10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.081461997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790579	2542660	2542561	279113	279017	SPAC328.03	SPAC31G5.17c	tps1	rps1001	-	rps10-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453240255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790580	2542660	2541576	279113	278073	SPAC328.03	SPBC1348.02	tps1	SPBC1348.02	-	SPAC1348.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509141607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790581	2542660	2540798	279113	277317	SPAC328.03	SPBC19C7.01	tps1	mni1	-	SPBC32F12.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451466984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790582	2542660	2540734	279113	277257	SPAC328.03	SPBC19G7.09	tps1	ulp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582594357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790583	2542660	2538730	279113	275314	SPAC328.03	SPCC31H12.02c	tps1	mug73	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.564284546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790584	2542059	2542895	278537	279339	SPAC328.06	SPAC13G6.10c	ubp2	asl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.507558945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790585	2542059	2543617	278537	280031	SPAC328.06	SPAC4A8.10	ubp2	SPAC4A8.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.769300939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790586	2542059	2540789	278537	277308	SPAC328.06	SPBC19C2.06c	ubp2	mug124	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925677724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790587	2542059	2540833	278537	277351	SPAC328.06	SPBC18H10.20c	ubp2	any1	-	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.926188045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790588	2542059	2542518	278537	278976	SPAC328.06	SPAC1B3.16c	ubp2	vht1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867177264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790589	2542059	2541343	278537	277854	SPAC328.06	SPBPB2B2.19c	ubp2	SPBPB2B2.19c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.102842057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790590	2542059	2542390	278537	278854	SPAC328.06	SPAC6F6.11c	ubp2	SPAC6F6.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.085703141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790591	2542059	2540956	278537	277472	SPAC328.06	SPBC409.06	ubp2	uch2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.595493348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790592	2542059	2541818	278537	278309	SPAC328.06	SPAC11G7.02	ubp2	pub1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.124802687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790593	2542059	2543592	278537	280007	SPAC328.06	SPAC4F10.18	ubp2	nup37	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.55016739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790594	2542059	2541621	278537	278118	SPAC328.06	SPAC29A4.17c	ubp2	SPAC29A4.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.717957414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790595	2542059	2538896	278537	275474	SPAC328.06	SPCC584.11c	ubp2	SPCC584.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317532131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790596	2542059	2539202	278537	275773	SPAC328.06	SPCC162.10	ubp2	ppk33	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323361239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790597	2542059	3361119	278537	280195	SPAC328.06	SPCC663.07c	ubp2	SPCC663.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.262864119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790598	2542059	2540296	278537	276827	SPAC328.06	SPBC2D10.05	ubp2	exg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.740778677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790599	2542059	2543201	278537	279630	SPAC328.06	SPAC3F10.15c	ubp2	spo12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.551394137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790600	2542059	2539734	278537	276286	SPAC328.06	SPBC1604.16c	ubp2	SPBC1604.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704247005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790601	2542059	2542614	278537	279068	SPAC328.06	SPAC1399.04c	ubp2	SPAC1399.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92589092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790602	2542059	2540491	278537	277019	SPAC328.06	SPBC28E12.04	ubp2	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453671579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790603	2542059	2541235	278537	277749	SPAC328.06	SPBC8D2.12c	ubp2	SPBC8D2.12c	-	pI053	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.750279837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790604	2542059	2543230	278537	279658	SPAC328.06	SPAC823.13c	ubp2	SPAC823.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.99179743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790605	2542059	2543590	278537	280005	SPAC328.06	SPAC4C5.03	ubp2	SPAC4C5.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.544839494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790606	2542059	2540029	278537	276573	SPAC328.06	SPBC16A3.01	ubp2	spn3	-	SPBC543.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045257496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790607	2542059	2543111	278537	279543	SPAC328.06	SPAC806.07	ubp2	ndk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.124414094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790608	2542059	2540692	278537	277217	SPAC328.06	SPBC800.07c	ubp2	tsf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866443031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790609	2542059	2538833	278537	275414	SPAC328.06	SPCP1E11.11	ubp2	puf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.562897543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790610	2542059	2539988	278537	276532	SPAC328.06	SPBC1271.05c	ubp2	SPBC1271.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381561185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790611	2542059	2541346	278537	277857	SPAC328.06	SPBP8B7.08c	ubp2	ppm1	-	SPBP8B7.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.123973321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790612	2542059	2542022	278537	278505	SPAC328.06	SPAC23A1.03	ubp2	apt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.004651396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790613	2542059	2542023	278537	278506	SPAC328.06	SPAC20H4.10	ubp2	ufd2	-	SPAC145.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.502173785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790614	2542059	2543685	278537	280099	SPAC328.06	SPAC3C7.03c	ubp2	rad55	-	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.339055419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790615	2542059	2540467	278537	276995	SPAC328.06	SPBC2G2.07c	ubp2	mug178	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.99852633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790616	2542059	2540595	278537	277121	SPAC328.06	SPBC21C3.02c	ubp2	dep1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871015607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790617	2542059	2543296	278537	279721	SPAC328.06	SPAC9E9.03	ubp2	leu2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.060319995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790618	2542059	2542649	278537	279103	SPAC328.06	SPAC24C9.14	ubp2	otu1	-	mug141	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445595209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790619	2542059	2539244	278537	275814	SPAC328.06	SPCC1672.06c	ubp2	asp1	-	vip1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.4111025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790620	2542059	2543319	278537	279743	SPAC328.06	SPAC6B12.09	ubp2	trm10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934175219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790621	2542059	2541663	278537	278159	SPAC328.06	SPAC22G7.08	ubp2	ppk8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.355518174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790622	2542059	2543615	278537	280029	SPAC328.06	SPAC4F8.08	ubp2	mug114	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.564649733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790623	2542059	2540825	278537	277343	SPAC328.06	SPBC428.08c	ubp2	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.694766342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790624	2542059	2540893	278537	277409	SPAC328.06	SPBC543.10	ubp2	get1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928314146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790625	2542059	2543573	278537	279988	SPAC328.06	SPAC869.11	ubp2	cat1	-	SPAC922.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931317648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790626	2542059	2542033	278537	278515	SPAC328.06	SPAC2C4.09	ubp2	SPAC2C4.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.078029766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790627	2542059	2542036	278537	278518	SPAC328.06	SPAC23A1.19c	ubp2	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.892074358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790628	2542059	2543349	278537	279771	SPAC328.06	SPAC977.02	ubp2	SPAC977.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984280589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790629	2542059	2539705	278537	276258	SPAC328.06	SPBC1105.10	ubp2	rav1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044094284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790630	2542059	2540892	278537	277408	SPAC328.06	SPBC530.01	ubp2	gyp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923602476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790631	2542059	2541800	278537	278291	SPAC328.06	SPAC732.02c	ubp2	SPAC732.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.162939578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790632	2542059	2541093	278537	277608	SPAC328.06	SPBC646.08c	ubp2	SPBC646.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.155493448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790633	2542059	2540192	278537	276725	SPAC328.06	SPBC1215.01	ubp2	shy1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632548797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790634	2542059	2540241	278537	276773	SPAC328.06	SPBC32H8.11	ubp2	mei4	-	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.668501624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790635	2542059	2538770	278537	275353	SPAC328.06	SPCC1753.02c	ubp2	git3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.385003653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790636	2542059	2542123	278537	278599	SPAC328.06	SPAC18G6.15	ubp2	mal3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.375570138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790637	2542059	2540150	278537	276687	SPAC328.06	SPBC16E9.14c	ubp2	zrg17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928859366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790638	2542059	2543638	278537	280052	SPAC328.06	SPAC3H8.09c	ubp2	nab3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.108300243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790639	2542059	2541889	278537	278379	SPAC328.06	SPAC2F7.03c	ubp2	pom1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.244154839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790640	2542059	2540886	278537	277403	SPAC328.06	SPBC4F6.10	ubp2	vps901	-	vps9a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036332828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790641	2542059	2542168	278537	278643	SPAC328.06	SPAC17A5.16	ubp2	ftp105	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935773564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790642	2542059	2541532	278537	278032	SPAC328.06	SPAC2C4.15c	ubp2	ubx2	-	ucp13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.123408342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790643	2542059	2538890	278537	275468	SPAC328.06	SPCC1393.02c	ubp2	spt2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.901403781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790644	2542059	2540086	278537	276624	SPAC328.06	SPBC16H5.12c	ubp2	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.608645558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790645	2542059	2542528	278537	278986	SPAC328.06	SPAC1B3.08	ubp2	SPAC1B3.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.069137876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790646	2542059	2543357	278537	279779	SPAC328.06	SPAC688.12c	ubp2	SPAC688.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326402778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790647	2542059	2538935	278537	275511	SPAC328.06	SPCC1682.11c	ubp2	ctl1	-	SPCC1682.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818388767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790648	2542059	2541389	278537	277900	SPAC328.06	SPBPB2B2.09c	ubp2	SPBPB2B2.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.119881464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790649	2542059	2539368	278537	275934	SPAC328.06	SPCC16A11.07	ubp2	coq10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633052118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790650	2542059	2539740	278537	276292	SPAC328.06	SPBC1685.04	ubp2	SPBC1685.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.352246963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790651	2542059	2541112	278537	277627	SPAC328.06	SPBC725.07	ubp2	pex5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570138914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790652	2542059	2541708	278537	278203	SPAC328.06	SPAC31A2.02	ubp2	trm112	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.877557144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790653	2542059	2539231	278537	275801	SPAC328.06	SPCC1672.03c	ubp2	SPCC1672.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.128521774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790654	2542059	2541410	278537	277918	SPAC328.06	SPBPB2B2.17c	ubp2	SPBPB2B2.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934067684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790655	2542059	2541406	278537	277914	SPAC328.06	SPBPB2B2.07c	ubp2	SPBPB2B2.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813472705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790656	2542059	2541186	278537	277700	SPAC328.06	SPBC725.01	ubp2	SPBC725.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844274771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790657	2542059	2543331	278537	279754	SPAC328.06	SPAC56E4.07	ubp2	SPAC56E4.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.3233867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790658	2542059	2540533	278537	277061	SPAC328.06	SPBC29A10.16c	ubp2	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.55741099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790659	2542059	2539711	278537	276264	SPAC328.06	SPBC1683.09c	ubp2	frp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.990593196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790660	2542059	2540193	278537	276726	SPAC328.06	SPBC1289.10c	ubp2	adn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38524178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790661	2542059	2540923	278537	277439	SPAC328.06	SPBC359.01	ubp2	SPBC359.01	-	SPBPB10D8.08	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987819246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790662	2542059	2540930	278537	277446	SPAC328.06	SPBC354.10	ubp2	def1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.614949145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790663	2542059	2539519	278537	276081	SPAC328.06	SPCC364.05	ubp2	vps3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.400441854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790664	2542059	2541742	278537	278236	SPAC328.06	SPAC22H10.09	ubp2	SPAC22H10.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.444527063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790665	2542059	2541793	278537	278284	SPAC328.06	SPAC22H10.02	ubp2	SPAC22H10.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699057646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790666	2542059	2541628	278537	278124	SPAC328.06	SPAC110.02	ubp2	pds5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807229836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790667	2542059	2539763	278537	276314	SPAC328.06	SPBC1861.05	ubp2	SPBC1861.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875306081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790668	2542059	2540959	278537	277475	SPAC328.06	SPBC365.12c	ubp2	ish1	-	isp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389714368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790669	2542059	2543391	278537	279813	SPAC328.06	SPAC4G9.09c	ubp2	arg11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818086867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790670	2542059	2543332	278537	279755	SPAC328.06	SPAPB8E5.04c	ubp2	SPAPB8E5.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091523951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790671	2542059	2542327	278537	278793	SPAC328.06	SPAC16C9.06c	ubp2	upf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200152509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790672	2542059	2540242	278537	276774	SPAC328.06	SPBC32F12.07c	ubp2	SPBC32F12.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713126836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790673	2542059	2543567	278537	279983	SPAC328.06	SPAC890.03	ubp2	ppk16	-	mug92	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.025878772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790674	2542059	2541909	278537	278399	SPAC328.06	SPAC227.01c	ubp2	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.824208188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790675	2542059	2539030	278537	275603	SPAC328.06	SPCP1E11.02	ubp2	ppk38	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.977936766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790676	2542059	2540648	278537	277173	SPAC328.06	SPBC1921.05	ubp2	ape2	-	ape1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384766325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790677	2542059	2538966	278537	275540	SPAC328.06	SPCC18.10	ubp2	SPCC18.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.351851866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790678	2542059	2543096	278537	279528	SPAC328.06	SPAC977.05c	ubp2	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.505883984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790679	2542059	2540657	278537	277182	SPAC328.06	SPBC1E8.02	ubp2	SPBC1E8.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991266136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790680	2542059	2539614	278537	276172	SPAC328.06	SPBC17D11.08	ubp2	SPBC17D11.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.745899449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790681	2542059	2541358	278537	277869	SPAC328.06	SPBP4H10.16c	ubp2	SPBP4H10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.671851301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790682	2542059	2539707	278537	276260	SPAC328.06	SPBC17F3.01c	ubp2	rga5	-	SPBC557.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.611225583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790683	2542059	2541531	278537	278031	SPAC328.06	SPAC25A8.01c	ubp2	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.340272241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790684	2542059	2540304	278537	276834	SPAC328.06	SPBC354.13	ubp2	rga6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044266061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790685	2542059	2540211	278537	276744	SPAC328.06	SPBC947.15c	ubp2	nde1	-	SPBC947.15c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.129188215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790686	2542059	2541789	278537	278281	SPAC328.06	SPAC23H4.08	ubp2	iwr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.709759924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790687	2542059	2539207	278537	275777	SPAC328.06	SPCC285.09c	ubp2	cgs2	-	pde1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567525157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790688	2542059	2539928	278537	276472	SPAC328.06	SPBC1604.08c	ubp2	imp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.815398071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790689	2542059	3361476	278537	280552	SPAC328.06	SPAC16A10.04	ubp2	rho4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.122408862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790690	2542059	2539702	278537	276255	SPAC328.06	SPBC1604.12	ubp2	SPBC1604.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462600724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790691	2542059	3361117	278537	280193	SPAC328.06	SPCC663.17	ubp2	wtf15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.563948945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790692	2542059	2543525	278537	279943	SPAC328.06	SPAC4A8.14	ubp2	SPAC4A8.14	-	prs1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814461687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790693	2542059	5802702	278537	857840	SPAC328.06	SPCC1235.15	ubp2	dga1	-	SPCC548.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639450805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790694	2542059	2542186	278537	278661	SPAC328.06	SPAC17C9.14	ubp2	SPAC17C9.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439909943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790695	2542059	2541657	278537	278153	SPAC328.06	SPAP27G11.15	ubp2	slx1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377705212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790696	2542059	3361410	278537	280486	SPAC328.06	SPAC1527.01	ubp2	mok11	-	SPAC23D3.15	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582792833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790697	2542059	2541151	278537	277666	SPAC328.06	SPBC713.03	ubp2	SPBC713.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.346855377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790698	2542059	2539181	278537	275752	SPAC328.06	SPCC622.14	ubp2	SPCC622.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.919528032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790699	2542059	2543327	278537	279750	SPAC328.06	SPAC1D4.06c	ubp2	csk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864341933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790700	2542059	2541627	278537	278123	SPAC328.06	SPAC1F5.08c	ubp2	yam8	-	ehs1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099191308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790701	2542059	2541375	278537	277886	SPAC328.06	SPBP8B7.31	ubp2	SPBP8B7.31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392238702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790702	2542059	2538947	278537	275521	SPAC328.06	SPCC1682.12c	ubp2	ubp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712941544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790703	2542059	2538834	278537	275415	SPAC328.06	SPCC126.08c	ubp2	SPCC126.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145685784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790704	2542059	2543090	278537	279523	SPAC328.06	SPBC1348.01	ubp2	SPBC1348.01	-	SPAC1348.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.716188401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790705	2542059	2540383	278537	276912	SPAC328.06	SPBC31E1.02c	ubp2	pmr1	-	cps5|pgak2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.917834829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790706	2542059	2540309	278537	276839	SPAC328.06	SPBC21B10.13c	ubp2	yox1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572237736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790707	2542059	2541236	278537	277750	SPAC328.06	SPBC887.11	ubp2	pus2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.185410082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790708	2542059	2541260	278537	277774	SPAC328.06	SPBC902.05c	ubp2	idh2	-	glu2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.208660075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790709	2542059	2540736	278537	277259	SPAC328.06	SPBC19F8.02	ubp2	SPBC19F8.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63947603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790710	2541045	2542207	277560	278682	SPBC543.03c	SPAC17H9.10c	pku80	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.343033781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790711	2541045	2542585	277560	279040	SPBC543.03c	SPAC31A2.13c	pku80	sft1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.403306197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790712	2541045	2541512	277560	278013	SPBC543.03c	SPAC11E3.08c	pku80	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.414073354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790713	2541045	2543164	277560	279595	SPBC543.03c	SPAC3G6.06c	pku80	rad2	-	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.557418814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790714	2541045	2538847	277560	275428	SPBC543.03c	SPCC594.06c	pku80	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913415018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790715	2541045	2543685	277560	280099	SPBC543.03c	SPAC3C7.03c	pku80	rad55	-	rhp55	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927213621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790716	2541045	2539352	277560	275918	SPBC543.03c	SPCC188.07	pku80	ccq1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.293657378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790717	2541045	2541663	277560	278159	SPBC543.03c	SPAC22G7.08	pku80	ppk8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.802449621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790718	2541045	2542007	277560	278490	SPBC543.03c	SPAC20H4.07	pku80	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.298630885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790719	2541045	2542710	277560	279163	SPBC543.03c	SPAC750.08c	pku80	SPAC750.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.190171368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790720	2541045	2542519	277560	278977	SPBC543.03c	SPAC19G12.08	pku80	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.680034246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790721	2541045	2539213	277560	275783	SPBC543.03c	SPCC285.10c	pku80	SPCC285.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153640397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790722	2541045	2543567	277560	279983	SPBC543.03c	SPAC890.03	pku80	ppk16	-	mug92	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200793459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790723	2541045	2542943	277560	279384	SPBC543.03c	SPBC1348.03	pku80	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.648145392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790724	2541520	2542207	278021	278682	SPAC2E1P5.03	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC2E1P5.03	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.45619914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790725	2541520	2538896	278021	275474	SPAC2E1P5.03	SPCC584.11c	SPAC2E1P5.03	SPCC584.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.12211794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790726	2541520	2540161	278021	276696	SPAC2E1P5.03	SPBC13E7.03c	SPAC2E1P5.03	SPBC13E7.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870720109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790727	2538936	2543637	275512	280051	SPCC10H11.01	SPAC3H8.02	prp11	csr102	prp5	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.475463514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790728	2538936	2539008	275512	275581	SPCC10H11.01	SPCC584.03c	prp11	SPCC584.03c	prp5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.204562948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790729	2538936	2540893	275512	277409	SPCC10H11.01	SPBC543.10	prp11	get1	prp5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506112151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790730	2538936	2540599	275512	277125	SPCC10H11.01	SPBC29A3.10c	prp11	atp14	prp5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.719132146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790731	2539268	2543637	275838	280051	SPCC10H11.02	SPAC3H8.02	cwf23	csr102	SPCP31B10.01	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.206500988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790732	2539268	2539008	275838	275581	SPCC10H11.02	SPCC584.03c	cwf23	SPCC584.03c	SPCP31B10.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.222105064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790733	2539268	2540893	275838	277409	SPCC10H11.02	SPBC543.10	cwf23	get1	SPCP31B10.01	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452067605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790734	2539268	2540232	275838	276764	SPCC10H11.02	SPBC336.10c	cwf23	tif512	SPCP31B10.01	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922892693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790735	2540409	2542273	276937	278742	SPBC2D10.11c	SPAC17H9.13c	nap2	SPAC17H9.13c	nap1.2|nap12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.555680336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790736	2540409	2542239	276937	278711	SPBC2D10.11c	SPAC18G6.02c	nap2	chp1	nap1.2|nap12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.829763406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790737	2540409	2541536	276937	278036	SPBC2D10.11c	SPAC1071.02	nap2	mms19	nap1.2|nap12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.500339538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790738	2540409	2540967	276937	277483	SPBC2D10.11c	SPBC36B7.08c	nap2	SPBC36B7.08c	nap1.2|nap12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.950898663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790739	2540409	2541175	276937	277689	SPBC2D10.11c	SPBC839.13c	nap2	rpl1601	nap1.2|nap12	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645390703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790740	2540409	2541531	276937	278031	SPBC2D10.11c	SPAC25A8.01c	nap2	fft3	nap1.2|nap12	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.707137936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790741	2543372	2539774	279794	276325	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC17A3.10	ase1	pas4	-	pi036	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.81970583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790742	2543372	2539050	279794	275623	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC11E10.08	ase1	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.932415463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790743	2543372	2538796	279794	275377	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC63.06	ase1	SPCC63.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706962413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790744	2543372	2539841	279794	276389	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC17D1.05	ase1	SPBC17D1.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.033581535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790745	2543372	2540060	279794	276598	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC106.01	ase1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.248687545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790746	2543372	2543317	279794	279741	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC823.14	ase1	ptf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.118352377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790747	2543372	2540105	279794	276642	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC106.04	ase1	ada1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379709979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790748	2543372	2539405	279794	275970	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC553.03	ase1	pex1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.917299939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790749	2543372	2541656	279794	278152	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC25H1.06	ase1	pcf3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.56693792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790750	2543372	2541512	279794	278013	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC11E3.08c	ase1	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.618101427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790751	2543372	2542066	279794	278543	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC227.05	ase1	SPAC227.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.284318686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790752	2543372	2541570	279794	278067	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC6G9.09c	ase1	rpl2401	-	rpl24|rpl24-01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.875533955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790753	2543372	2543064	279794	279497	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC3G6.01	ase1	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.832369143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790754	2543372	2541552	279794	278051	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC1142.08	ase1	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.48051551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790755	2543372	2542358	279794	278823	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC1782.09c	ase1	clp1	-	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.117066465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790756	2543372	2542378	279794	278842	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC1805.04	ase1	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.159536884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790757	2543372	2541438	279794	277943	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC23G3.10c	ase1	ssr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994631869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790758	2543372	2541853	279794	278344	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC2F3.11	ase1	SPAC2F3.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.528663525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790759	2543372	2542098	279794	278574	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC30D11.01c	ase1	gto2	-	SPAC30D11.01c|SPAC56F8.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.56977906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790760	2543372	2543201	279794	279630	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC3F10.15c	ase1	spo12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.562505845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790761	2543372	2540474	279794	277002	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC26H8.09c	ase1	snf59	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.910275627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790762	2543372	2540694	279794	277218	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC19C7.10	ase1	bqt4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.123088452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790763	2543372	2540686	279794	277211	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC21D10.10	ase1	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.661507664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790764	2543372	2539890	279794	276436	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC16C6.03c	ase1	SPBC16C6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.631282711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790765	2543372	2538922	279794	275499	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC16C4.10	ase1	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.672406333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790766	2543372	2540455	279794	276983	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC215.05	ase1	gpd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.201728531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790767	2543372	2540664	279794	277189	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC215.02	ase1	bob1	-	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.056918428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790768	2543372	2539420	279794	275985	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC970.07c	ase1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.622387184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790769	2543372	2540560	279794	277087	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC2D10.14c	ase1	myo51	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.600513163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790770	2543372	2538847	279794	275428	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC594.06c	ase1	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.814741336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790771	2543372	2541092	279794	277607	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC660.12c	ase1	egt2	-	SPBC660.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775610102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790772	2543372	2541498	279794	278000	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC227.10	ase1	SPAC227.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.831608841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790773	2543372	2538801	279794	275382	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC285.13c	ase1	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.479459225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790774	2543372	2543453	279794	279873	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC3G9.03	ase1	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.052210944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790775	2543372	2543542	279794	279959	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC823.09c	ase1	SPAC823.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.690557668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790776	2543372	2540727	279794	277250	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC1921.03c	ase1	mex67	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.980527087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790777	2543372	2541831	279794	278322	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC23G3.03	ase1	sib2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322174621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790778	2543372	2542318	279794	278784	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC16C9.05	ase1	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.05645542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790779	2543372	2542082	279794	278559	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC29B12.10c	ase1	pgt1	-	opt1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385406262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790780	2543372	2539352	279794	275918	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC188.07	ase1	ccq1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.775475381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790781	2543372	2543319	279794	279743	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC6B12.09	ase1	trm10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.899458921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790782	2543372	2538906	279794	275483	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC1259.03	ase1	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.284090944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790783	2543372	2540825	279794	277343	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC428.08c	ase1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.724776898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790784	2543372	2541926	279794	278414	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC222.14c	ase1	SPAC222.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.784254536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790785	2543372	2542568	279794	279024	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC1952.02	ase1	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.022143766	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790786	2543372	2539960	279794	276504	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC15D4.15	ase1	pho2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990218232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790787	2543372	2542311	279794	278777	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC16A10.05c	ase1	dad1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.501310351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790788	2543372	2542679	279794	279132	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC12B10.07	ase1	acp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.990811873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790789	2543372	2540631	279794	277157	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC25B2.10	ase1	SPBC25B2.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.384922647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790790	2543372	2542964	279794	279404	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC12G12.07c	ase1	SPAC12G12.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.557811468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790791	2543372	2542513	279794	278971	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC1952.05	ase1	gcn5	-	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.784197564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790792	2543372	2540922	279794	277438	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC36.10	ase1	SPBC36.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.922940079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790793	2543372	2538706	279794	275290	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC338.08	ase1	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.988297175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790794	2543372	2540352	279794	276881	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC215.03c	ase1	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.907546929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790795	2543372	2539733	279794	276285	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC16E9.12c	ase1	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.992256642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790796	2543372	2540673	279794	277198	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC1D7.03	ase1	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.422848193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790797	2543372	2540150	279794	276687	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC16E9.14c	ase1	zrg17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645252753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790798	2543372	2538800	279794	275381	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC1322.06	ase1	kap113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.259836059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790799	2543372	2541889	279794	278379	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC2F7.03c	ase1	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.310225348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790800	2543372	2539219	279794	275789	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC1795.01c	ase1	mad3	-	SPCC895.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.5127394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790801	2543372	2539454	279794	276017	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC622.15c	ase1	SPCC622.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.820190786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790802	2543372	2539999	279794	276543	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC1734.15	ase1	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.588645084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790803	2543372	2541496	279794	277998	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC23D3.09	ase1	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.577991604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790804	2543372	2542216	279794	278690	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC19A8.02	ase1	SPAC19A8.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.919025938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790805	2543372	2542357	279794	278822	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC1782.07	ase1	qcr8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981420201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790806	2543372	2540086	279794	276624	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC16H5.12c	ase1	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.262758886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790807	2543372	2540326	279794	276856	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC2G5.06c	ase1	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.560072542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790808	2543372	2542126	279794	278602	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC1B3.05	ase1	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.662182428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790809	2543372	2543244	279794	279672	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC6B12.06c	ase1	rrg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842330273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790810	2543372	2539850	279794	276398	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC15D4.07c	ase1	atg9	-	apg9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094484988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790811	2543372	2538849	279794	275430	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC330.14c	ase1	rpl2402	-	rpl24-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.260822317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790812	2543372	2540836	279794	277354	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC18H10.19	ase1	vps38	-	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379580333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790813	2543372	2541241	279794	277755	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC887.17	ase1	SPBC887.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701397784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790814	2543372	2543378	279794	279800	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC3H8.07c	ase1	pac10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.576466758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790815	2543372	2542398	279794	278862	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC1805.03c	ase1	trm13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.776767377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790816	2543372	2541009	279794	277524	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC428.04	ase1	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.414591473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790817	2543372	2542008	279794	278491	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC2G11.07c	ase1	ptc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.586388577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790818	2543372	2541112	279794	277627	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC725.07	ase1	pex5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.717632151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790819	2543372	2541959	279794	278446	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC23C4.03	ase1	hrk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.057113882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790820	2543372	2540599	279794	277125	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC29A3.10c	ase1	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.92194033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790821	2543372	3361470	279794	280546	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC3G9.01	ase1	nsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.562044129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790822	2543372	2541395	279794	277904	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBP8B7.25	ase1	cyp4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.890270925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790823	2543372	2540844	279794	277361	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC1921.04c	ase1	SPBC1921.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.28078087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790824	2543372	2538690	279794	275275	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC1393.05	ase1	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.728117455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790825	2543372	2539812	279794	276362	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC1347.02	ase1	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.263422995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790826	2543372	2541337	279794	277848	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBP35G2.13c	ase1	swc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.12310325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790827	2543372	2543139	279794	279571	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC12G12.03	ase1	cip2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.526991597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790828	2543372	2540589	279794	277115	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC20F10.06	ase1	mad2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790829	2543372	2541793	279794	278284	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC22H10.02	ase1	SPAC22H10.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64049137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790830	2543372	2538848	279794	275429	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC613.12c	ase1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.56728803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790831	2543372	2539538	279794	276100	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC364.06	ase1	nap1	-	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.383767962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790832	2543372	2542198	279794	278673	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC6F12.09	ase1	rdp1	-	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569341689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790833	2543372	2541156	279794	277671	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC685.07c	ase1	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.812189783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790834	2543372	2540519	279794	277047	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC21C3.14c	ase1	SPBC21C3.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.052683094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790835	2543372	2541175	279794	277689	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC839.13c	ase1	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.995255385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790836	2543372	2543106	279794	279538	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC3A11.13	ase1	SPAC3A11.13	-	SPAC3H5.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.769066367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790837	2543372	2543567	279794	279983	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC890.03	ase1	ppk16	-	mug92	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.40405958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790838	2543372	2538966	279794	275540	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC18.10	ase1	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.777370428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790839	2543372	2540998	279794	277514	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC3D6.05	ase1	ptp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.421108015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790840	2543372	2542940	279794	279381	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC31A2.12	ase1	SPAC31A2.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.818464535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790841	2543372	2540725	279794	277248	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC215.14c	ase1	vps20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714486019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790842	2543372	2541367	279794	277878	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBP8B7.13	ase1	vac7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.839834489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790843	2543372	2539013	279794	275586	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC364.03	ase1	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.203619981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790844	2543372	2541470	279794	277972	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAPYUG7.04c	ase1	rpb9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.289714535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790845	2543372	2542326	279794	278792	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC16C9.07	ase1	pom2	-	SPAC2G11.01|mug189|ppk5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.064316528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790846	2543372	2539668	279794	276223	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC11B10.10c	ase1	pht1	-	pi001	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.073490711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790847	2543372	2542262	279794	278731	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC17C9.10	ase1	stm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.198643586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790848	2543372	2543633	279794	280047	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC3H8.05c	ase1	mms1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.192177578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790849	2543372	2539205	279794	275775	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC4B3.15	ase1	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.474696946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790850	2543372	2542186	279794	278661	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC17C9.14	ase1	SPAC17C9.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.393401091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790851	2543372	2540146	279794	276683	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC17A3.06	ase1	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440035785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790852	2543372	2539178	279794	275749	SPAPB1A10.09	SPCC1682.14	ase1	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189869173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790853	2543372	2543337	279794	279760	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC959.08	ase1	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.046495541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790854	2543372	2543220	279794	279648	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAPB21F2.02	ase1	SPAPB21F2.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86682158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790855	2543372	2539700	279794	276253	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC1685.15c	ase1	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.306953264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790856	2543372	2543387	279794	279809	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAPB1E7.02c	ase1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.142302918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790857	2543372	2543076	279794	279509	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC30C2.07	ase1	SPAC30C2.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.821029013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790858	2543372	2540828	279794	277346	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC4B4.06	ase1	vps25	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.561484438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790859	2543372	2542175	279794	278650	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC1F3.02c	ase1	mkh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042870082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790860	2543372	2539768	279794	276319	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC1703.09	ase1	SPBC1703.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321028059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790861	2543372	2543333	279794	279756	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC694.02	ase1	SPAC694.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925497577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790862	2543372	2543448	279794	279868	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC3H5.07	ase1	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.853650641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790863	2543372	2542094	279794	278571	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC29B12.06c	ase1	rcd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.14516649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790864	3361560	2542613	280636	279067	SPAC14C4.09	SPAC18B11.03c	agn1	SPAC18B11.03c	SPAC14C4.09	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035685823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790865	3361560	2542714	280636	279167	SPAC14C4.09	SPAC5H10.06c	agn1	adh4	SPAC14C4.09	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867476977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790866	3361560	2539235	280636	275805	SPAC14C4.09	SPCC1682.15	agn1	mug122	SPAC14C4.09	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926964061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790867	3361560	2539049	280636	275622	SPAC14C4.09	SPCC11E10.09c	agn1	SPCC11E10.09c	SPAC14C4.09	SPCC188.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876966076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790868	3361560	2539231	280636	275801	SPAC14C4.09	SPCC1672.03c	agn1	SPCC1672.03c	SPAC14C4.09	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.192825423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790869	3361560	2539812	280636	276362	SPAC14C4.09	SPBC1347.02	agn1	fkbp39	SPAC14C4.09	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.400381006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790870	3361560	2541378	280636	277889	SPAC14C4.09	SPBP8B7.21	agn1	ubp3	SPAC14C4.09	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.120229704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790871	3361560	2539600	280636	276158	SPAC14C4.09	SPCP1E11.03	agn1	mug170	SPAC14C4.09	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985864836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790872	3361560	2538792	280636	275373	SPAC14C4.09	SPCP1E11.10	agn1	SPCP1E11.10	SPAC14C4.09	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.564615238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790873	2539209	2538961	275779	275535	SPCC23B6.03c	SPCC285.14	tel1	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.55878067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790874	2539209	2541026	275779	277541	SPCC23B6.03c	SPBC337.09	tel1	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.440972591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790875	2539209	2541806	275779	278297	SPCC23B6.03c	SPAC4G8.13c	tel1	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.922025694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790876	2539209	2543387	275779	279809	SPCC23B6.03c	SPAPB1E7.02c	tel1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.354846369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790877	3361548	2539774	280624	276325	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC17A3.10	atg6	pas4	SPAC3A12.01c	pi036	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044471487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790878	3361548	2539147	280624	275719	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC622.12c	atg6	gdh1	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041889489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790879	3361548	2538721	280624	275305	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC1494.10	atg6	adn3	SPAC3A12.01c	SPCC70.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982003151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790880	3361548	2542435	280624	278897	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC1805.16c	atg6	SPAC1805.16c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.907144839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790881	3361548	2539405	280624	275970	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC553.03	atg6	pex1	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322972144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790882	3361548	2540885	280624	277402	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC660.14	atg6	mik1	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447045361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790883	3361548	2542291	280624	278759	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC17C9.08	atg6	pnu1	SPAC3A12.01c	end1|nuc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.344231617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790884	3361548	2539949	280624	276493	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC1703.04	atg6	mlh1	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.507273703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790885	3361548	2542518	280624	278976	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC1B3.16c	atg6	vht1	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.100673496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790886	3361548	2542390	280624	278854	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC6F6.11c	atg6	SPAC6F6.11c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381695992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790887	3361548	2540913	280624	277429	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC56F2.08c	atg6	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.259740756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790888	3361548	2539452	280624	276015	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC70.03c	atg6	SPCC70.03c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090461213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790889	3361548	2540026	280624	276570	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC16D10.08c	atg6	hsp104	SPAC3A12.01c	SPBC16D10.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444717556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790890	3361548	2542706	280624	279159	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC29B12.13	atg6	SPAC29B12.13	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.198784241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790891	3361548	2543064	280624	279497	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC3G6.01	atg6	hrp3	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.103281198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790892	3361548	2540131	280624	276668	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC1778.05c	atg6	SPBC1778.05c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990881715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790893	3361548	2539582	280624	276141	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC594.07c	atg6	bqt3	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.719930697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790894	3361548	2543575	280624	279990	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC644.13c	atg6	SPAC644.13c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.140724362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790895	3361548	2538993	280624	275567	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC162.12	atg6	tco89	SPAC3A12.01c	SPCC1753.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982828672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790896	3361548	2541787	280624	278279	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC2E12.03c	atg6	SPAC2E12.03c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819956783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790897	3361548	2538929	280624	275505	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC162.02c	atg6	SPCC162.02c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877462218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790898	3361548	2540099	280624	276637	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC16H5.11c	atg6	skb1	SPAC3A12.01c	rmt5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.446912626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790899	3361548	2541853	280624	278344	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC2F3.11	atg6	SPAC2F3.11	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091017922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790900	3361548	2540410	280624	276938	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC2D10.04	atg6	SPBC2D10.04	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.511865839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790901	3361548	2541117	280624	277632	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC646.13	atg6	sds23	SPAC3A12.01c	moc1|psp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.923343336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790902	3361548	2543594	280624	280009	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC8F11.05c	atg6	mug130	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.754819607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790903	3361548	2540686	280624	277211	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC21D10.10	atg6	bdc1	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441026023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790904	3361548	2539890	280624	276436	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC16C6.03c	atg6	SPBC16C6.03c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.100151796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790905	3361548	2542701	280624	279154	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC26H5.05	atg6	mga2	SPAC3A12.01c	SPAC26H5.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035499476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790906	3361548	2538922	280624	275499	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC16C4.10	atg6	SPCC16C4.10	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926552066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790907	3361548	2539263	280624	275833	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC895.09c	atg6	ucp12	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.548571075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790908	3361548	2540455	280624	276983	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC215.05	atg6	gpd1	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.99178588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790909	3361548	2538806	280624	275387	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC1840.09	atg6	SPCC1840.09	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.271581116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790910	3361548	2543098	280624	279530	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC4A8.06c	atg6	SPAC4A8.06c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.97845772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790911	3361548	2539332	280624	275898	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCPB1C11.01	atg6	amt1	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.266126925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790912	3361548	3361375	280624	280451	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC212.06c	atg6	SPAC212.06c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318953216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790913	3361548	2539226	280624	275796	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC16C4.20c	atg6	SPCC16C4.20c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809001652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790914	3361548	2542677	280624	279130	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC26F1.10c	atg6	pyp1	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925808266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790915	3361548	2541092	280624	277607	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC660.12c	atg6	egt2	SPAC3A12.01c	SPBC660.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153087122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790916	3361548	2539913	280624	276457	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC11G11.03	atg6	mrt4	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.054255034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790917	3361548	2539463	280624	276026	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC550.11	atg6	SPCC550.11	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386525299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790918	3361548	2542299	280624	278766	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC18B11.10	atg6	tup11	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.135828741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790919	3361548	2540945	280624	277461	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC342.06c	atg6	rtt109	SPAC3A12.01c	kat11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.40042242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790920	3361548	2539606	280624	276164	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC15D4.05	atg6	SPBC15D4.05	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984309356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790921	3361548	2540220	280624	276753	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC337.03	atg6	rhn1	SPAC3A12.01c	SPBC337.03|iss4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867894261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790922	3361548	2541119	280624	277634	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC651.11c	atg6	apm3	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.624933891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790923	3361548	3361385	280624	280461	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC1639.02c	atg6	trk2	SPAC3A12.01c	SPAC1F5.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.412928562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790924	3361548	2542022	280624	278505	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC23A1.03	atg6	apt1	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818547477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790925	3361548	2541323	280624	277835	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBP35G2.14	atg6	SPBP35G2.14	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.320269367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790926	3361548	2541527	280624	278027	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC31A2.09c	atg6	apm4	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.554628065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790927	3361548	2543609	280624	280023	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC630.05	atg6	gyp7	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712632281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790928	3361548	2541960	280624	278447	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC6G9.15c	atg6	SPAC6G9.15c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.83759586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790929	3361548	2540851	280624	277368	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC4F6.04	atg6	rpl2502	SPAC3A12.01c	rpl23a-2|rpl25b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.440062129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790930	3361548	2539822	280624	276372	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC16G5.02c	atg6	SPBC16G5.02c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.534930039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790931	3361548	2540663	280624	277188	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC56F2.06	atg6	mug147	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.960266873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790932	3361548	2539129	280624	275701	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC338.14	atg6	ado1	SPAC3A12.01c	SPCC338.14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927806092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790933	3361548	2542644	280624	279098	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC24C9.16c	atg6	cox8	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.072713421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790934	3361548	2540540	280624	277067	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC23E6.10c	atg6	SPBC23E6.10c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.625454411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790935	3361548	2543641	280624	280055	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC3H5.08c	atg6	SPAC3H5.08c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.380677951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790936	3361548	2541522	280624	278023	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC23E2.01	atg6	fep1	SPAC3A12.01c	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.877727227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790937	3361548	2543584	280624	279999	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAPB1E7.11c	atg6	SPAPB1E7.11c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923925356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790938	3361548	2539352	280624	275918	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC188.07	atg6	ccq1	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983696128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790939	3361548	2542230	280624	278703	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC1B3.06c	atg6	SPAC1B3.06c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453034874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790940	3361548	2543615	280624	280029	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC4F8.08	atg6	mug114	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321525438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790941	3361548	2540964	280624	277480	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC365.16	atg6	SPBC365.16	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.511910553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790942	3361548	2542331	280624	278797	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC1834.05	atg6	alg9	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.340164877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790943	3361548	2542568	280624	279024	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC1952.02	atg6	tma23	SPAC3A12.01c	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044963015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790944	3361548	2539032	280624	275605	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC4B3.05c	atg6	hem12	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.660988714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790945	3361548	2539051	280624	275624	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC1183.11	atg6	msy1	SPAC3A12.01c	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.99007832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790946	3361548	2542950	280624	279390	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC12B10.03	atg6	bun62	SPAC3A12.01c	wdr20	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455057492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790947	3361548	2538821	280624	275402	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC584.01c	atg6	SPCC584.01c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.253197028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790948	3361548	2540797	280624	277316	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC18H10.11c	atg6	ppr2	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.9844457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790949	3361548	2542964	280624	279404	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC12G12.07c	atg6	SPAC12G12.07c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506254508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790950	3361548	2543102	280624	279534	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC31G5.21	atg6	SPAC31G5.21	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.458875107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790951	3361548	2541250	280624	277764	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC8D2.17	atg6	gmh4	SPAC3A12.01c	SPBC8D2.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.27093588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790952	3361548	2541160	280624	277675	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC725.09c	atg6	hob3	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.122868696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790953	3361548	2540348	280624	276877	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC29A10.05	atg6	exo1	SPAC3A12.01c	mut2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987661622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790954	3361548	3361491	280624	280567	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC1805.08	atg6	dlc1	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.047693589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790955	3361548	2540338	280624	276867	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC2G2.13c	atg6	dcd1	SPAC3A12.01c	SPBC2G2.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143259423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790956	3361548	2540922	280624	277438	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC36.10	atg6	SPBC36.10	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.457938691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790957	3361548	2539984	280624	276528	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC1289.11	atg6	spf38	SPAC3A12.01c	cwf17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632824109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790958	3361548	2543412	280624	279834	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC637.07	atg6	moe1	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.921896055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790959	3361548	2539754	280624	276306	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC16C6.04	atg6	dbl6	SPAC3A12.01c	SPBC16C6.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517185037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790960	3361548	2540673	280624	277198	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC1D7.03	atg6	mug80	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148035518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790961	3361548	2539394	280624	275959	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC1620.13	atg6	SPCC1620.13	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321172543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790962	3361548	2541578	280624	278075	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC25B8.05	atg6	deg1	SPAC3A12.01c	SPAC25B8.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.619305892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790963	3361548	2539219	280624	275789	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC1795.01c	atg6	mad3	SPAC3A12.01c	SPCC895.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.837956627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790964	3361548	2542989	280624	279427	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC11E3.13c	atg6	gas5	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.496533192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790965	3361548	2543531	280624	279949	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC926.06c	atg6	SPAC926.06c	SPAC3A12.01c	lrr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992197077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790966	3361548	2539454	280624	276017	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC622.15c	atg6	SPCC622.15c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866327691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790967	3361548	2541496	280624	277998	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC23D3.09	atg6	arp42	SPAC3A12.01c	arp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.174284688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790968	3361548	2542522	280624	278980	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC19A8.03	atg6	ymr1	SPAC3A12.01c	SPAC19A8.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.333426489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790969	3361548	2543363	280624	279785	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAPB24D3.09c	atg6	pdr1	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.441054474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790970	3361548	2539603	280624	276161	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC1289.06c	atg6	ppr8	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449583821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790971	3361548	2541413	280624	277921	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBPJ4664.06	atg6	gpt1	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929388357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790972	3361548	2538852	280624	275433	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC4E9.01c	atg6	rec11	SPAC3A12.01c	SPCC550.16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45024809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790973	3361548	2540326	280624	276856	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC2G5.06c	atg6	hmt2	SPAC3A12.01c	cad1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041039509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790974	3361548	2541824	280624	278315	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC27E2.02	atg6	SPAC27E2.02	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.433397318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790975	3361548	2540176	280624	276709	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC1709.01	atg6	chs2	SPAC3A12.01c	SPBC1734.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.916236934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790976	3361548	2542710	280624	279163	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC750.08c	atg6	SPAC750.08c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516457868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790977	3361548	2541720	280624	278214	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC23H3.13c	atg6	gpa2	SPAC3A12.01c	git8	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.818413411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790978	3361548	2543392	280624	279814	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC8F11.03	atg6	msh3	SPAC3A12.01c	swi4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771261375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790979	3361548	2540836	280624	277354	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC18H10.19	atg6	vps38	SPAC3A12.01c	atg14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.491174974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790980	3361548	2540232	280624	276764	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC336.10c	atg6	tif512	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154567209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790981	3361548	2542612	280624	279066	SPAC20G8.10c	SPACUNK4.15	atg6	SPACUNK4.15	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.749599338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790982	3361548	2542549	280624	279006	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC19A8.11c	atg6	SPAC19A8.11c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.182195908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790983	3361548	2539215	280624	275785	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC285.16c	atg6	msh6	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.763732814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790984	3361548	2538824	280624	275405	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC1442.14c	atg6	hnt1	SPAC3A12.01c	SPCC1442.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.83706738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790985	3361548	2540378	280624	276907	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC30D10.18c	atg6	rpl102	SPAC3A12.01c	rpl1-2|rpl10a-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.14308823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790986	3361548	2541041	280624	277556	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC3D6.13c	atg6	pdi3	SPAC3A12.01c	pdi2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.62734926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790987	3361548	2539317	280624	275883	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC16A11.08	atg6	atg20	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096033747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790988	3361548	2541142	280624	277657	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC725.04	atg6	SPBC725.04	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868256716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790989	3361548	2541536	280624	278036	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC1071.02	atg6	mms19	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090386708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790990	3361548	2539402	280624	275967	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC613.03	atg6	SPCC613.03	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326409641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790991	3361548	2540180	280624	276713	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC16D10.11c	atg6	rps1801	SPAC3A12.01c	rps18-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709779407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790992	3361548	2542267	280624	278736	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAPYUK71.03c	atg6	syn1	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.197555518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790993	3361548	2541281	280624	277794	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC902.04	atg6	rmn1	SPAC3A12.01c	SPBC902.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.276745841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790994	3361548	2540599	280624	277125	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC29A3.10c	atg6	atp14	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.436548855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790995	3361548	2538828	280624	275409	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC1020.05	atg6	SPCC1020.05	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.559632268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790996	3361548	2541296	280624	277808	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBP8B7.06	atg6	rpp201	SPAC3A12.01c	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991802577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790997	3361548	2540882	280624	277399	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC4F6.08c	atg6	mrpl39	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.767119225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790998	3361548	2540357	280624	276886	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC2F12.05c	atg6	SPBC2F12.05c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.541977211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
790999	3361548	2539993	280624	276537	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC1105.05	atg6	exg1	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.335500846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791000	3361548	2539569	280624	276129	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCPB16A4.03c	atg6	ade10	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.612511484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791001	3361548	2540005	280624	276549	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC1347.09	atg6	SPBC1347.09	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819678502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791002	3361548	2540930	280624	277446	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC354.10	atg6	def1	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154252169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791003	3361548	2541742	280624	278236	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC22H10.09	atg6	SPAC22H10.09	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389005409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791004	3361548	2540946	280624	277462	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC36.04	atg6	cys11	SPAC3A12.01c	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641680138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791005	3361548	2541144	280624	277659	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC685.06	atg6	rps001	SPAC3A12.01c	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.408682682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791006	3361548	2539932	280624	276476	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC13E7.07	atg6	SPBC13E7.07	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.461323561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791007	3361548	2540001	280624	276545	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC1289.13c	atg6	gmh6	SPAC3A12.01c	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.817872754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791008	3361548	2539706	280624	276259	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC16G5.13	atg6	ptf2	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.995086978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791009	3361548	2543113	280624	279545	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC3F10.07c	atg6	erf4	SPAC3A12.01c	mug91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.665851188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791010	3361548	2540959	280624	277475	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC365.12c	atg6	ish1	SPAC3A12.01c	isp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814331106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791011	3361548	2540701	280624	277225	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC19C7.08c	atg6	SPBC19C7.08c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634211399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791012	3361548	2540706	280624	277229	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC19C7.12c	atg6	omh1	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.82045123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791013	3361548	2539354	280624	275920	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC4F11.03c	atg6	SPCC4F11.03c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098121256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791014	3361548	2540226	280624	276758	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC32H8.08c	atg6	omh5	SPAC3A12.01c	pi016|SPACTOKYO_453.20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381456192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791015	3361548	2539082	280624	275654	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC126.03	atg6	pus1	SPAC3A12.01c	lps1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.255070629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791016	3361548	2539137	280624	275709	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC1682.08c	atg6	mcp2	SPAC3A12.01c	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647324148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791017	3361548	2543567	280624	279983	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC890.03	atg6	ppk16	SPAC3A12.01c	mug92	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.3870429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791018	3361548	2542883	280624	279328	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC1486.04c	atg6	alm1	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819817068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791019	3361548	2541973	280624	278458	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC6G9.13c	atg6	bqt1	SPAC3A12.01c	mug23|rec26	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573246732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791020	3361548	2540648	280624	277173	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC1921.05	atg6	ape2	SPAC3A12.01c	ape1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05102339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791021	3361548	2542621	280624	279075	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC5H10.05c	atg6	SPAC5H10.05c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445604292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791022	3361548	2540800	280624	277319	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC409.20c	atg6	psh3	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.868522944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791023	3361548	2540152	280624	276688	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC12C2.03c	atg6	SPBC12C2.03c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450189187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791024	3361548	2543304	280624	279728	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC6B12.12	atg6	tom70	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.740106574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791025	3361548	2542541	280624	278998	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC1B3.03c	atg6	wis2	SPAC3A12.01c	cyp5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.410875849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791026	3361548	2541617	280624	278114	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC27D7.04	atg6	omt2	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04518234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791027	3361548	2541432	280624	277937	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC1F5.05c	atg6	mso1	SPAC3A12.01c	SPAC1F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926165087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791028	3361548	2540654	280624	277179	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC19F5.01c	atg6	puc1	SPAC3A12.01c	SPBP8B7.32c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816917139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791029	3361548	2539136	280624	275708	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC1919.05	atg6	SPCC1919.05	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.454892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791030	3361548	2542042	280624	278523	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC23A1.14c	atg6	SPAC23A1.14c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193687201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791031	3361548	2541229	280624	277743	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC839.05c	atg6	rps1701	SPAC3A12.01c	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149155233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791032	3361548	2540677	280624	277202	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC21B10.03c	atg6	ath1	SPAC3A12.01c	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771623512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791033	3361548	2541036	280624	277551	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC3H7.05c	atg6	SPBC3H7.05c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87781434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791034	3361548	2541149	280624	277664	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC651.03c	atg6	gyp10	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.048476801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791035	3361548	2542918	280624	279359	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC12G12.12	atg6	SPAC12G12.12	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634506673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791036	3361548	2539729	280624	276281	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC11B10.07c	atg6	ivn1	SPAC3A12.01c	pi004|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.926456327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791037	3361548	2542250	280624	278720	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC17D4.03c	atg6	cis4	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049020858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791038	3361548	2541244	280624	277758	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC8D2.02c	atg6	vps68	SPAC3A12.01c	SPBC8D2.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700141075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791039	3361548	2539736	280624	276288	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC12C2.12c	atg6	glo1	SPAC3A12.01c	SPBC21D10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.839869595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791040	3361548	2539205	280624	275775	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC4B3.15	atg6	mid1	SPAC3A12.01c	dmf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.102699755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791041	3361548	2539189	280624	275760	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC1682.16	atg6	rpt4	SPAC3A12.01c	SPCC306.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.343234714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791042	3361548	2543337	280624	279760	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC959.08	atg6	rpl2102	SPAC3A12.01c	rpl21|rpl21-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.27244611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791043	3361548	2538803	280624	275384	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC757.11c	atg6	SPCC757.11c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.488185742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791044	3361548	2539253	280624	275823	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC1827.03c	atg6	SPCC1827.03c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.231713886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791045	3361548	2539037	280624	275610	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC330.07c	atg6	SPCC330.07c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.37935327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791046	3361548	2542119	280624	278595	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC1834.08	atg6	mak1	SPAC3A12.01c	phk3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442193352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791047	3361548	2538861	280624	275441	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC1620.11	atg6	nup97	SPAC3A12.01c	mug87	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.561819132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791048	3361548	2542716	280624	279169	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC25H1.07	atg6	emc1	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.338828904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791049	3361548	2543400	280624	279822	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC3G9.11c	atg6	SPAC3G9.11c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.933015108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791050	3361548	2541774	280624	278268	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC22E12.05c	atg6	rer1	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147243087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791051	3361548	2543387	280624	279809	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAPB1E7.02c	atg6	mcl1	SPAC3A12.01c	slr3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981467658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791052	3361548	2543446	280624	279866	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC4F8.10c	atg6	stg1	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.410642516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791053	3361548	2540173	280624	276706	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC106.13	atg6	SPBC106.13	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.82627632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791054	3361548	2543087	280624	279520	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC30C2.04	atg6	SPAC30C2.04	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193015899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791055	3361548	2543076	280624	279509	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC30C2.07	atg6	SPAC30C2.07	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.410524821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791056	3361548	2543587	280624	280002	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC4D7.02c	atg6	SPAC4D7.02c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989161616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791057	3361548	2538920	280624	275497	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC1840.05c	atg6	SPCC1840.05c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.671740018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791058	3361548	2540481	280624	277009	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC2D10.12	atg6	rhp23	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042941719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791059	3361548	2541646	280624	278142	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC750.06c	atg6	SPAC750.06c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440837646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791060	3361548	2539085	280624	275657	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC285.15c	atg6	rps2802	SPAC3A12.01c	rps28|rps28-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810202604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791061	3361548	2543624	280624	280038	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC4D7.06c	atg6	SPAC4D7.06c	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.970427251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791062	3361548	2540938	280624	277454	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC365.14c	atg6	uge1	SPAC3A12.01c	gal10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.749315363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791063	3361548	2542094	280624	278571	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC29B12.06c	atg6	rcd1	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.663214114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791064	3361548	2540811	280624	277330	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC19C7.05	atg6	SPBC19C7.05	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.312688343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791065	3361548	2540798	280624	277317	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC19C7.01	atg6	mni1	SPAC3A12.01c	SPBC32F12.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514572564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791066	3361548	2540734	280624	277257	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC19G7.09	atg6	ulp1	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.184033804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791067	3361548	2539033	280624	275606	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC1450.07c	atg6	dao1	SPAC3A12.01c	SPCC1450.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.466727737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791068	3361548	2541116	280624	277631	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC609.04	atg6	caf5	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.764134208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791069	2539817	2540131	276367	276668	SPBC146.03c	SPBC1778.05c	cut3	SPBC1778.05c	smc4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.002291406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791070	2539817	2542963	276367	279403	SPBC146.03c	SPAC1071.03c	cut3	sil1	smc4	SPAC1071.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808187894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791071	2539817	2538922	276367	275499	SPBC146.03c	SPCC16C4.10	cut3	SPCC16C4.10	smc4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382518831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791072	2539817	2541286	276367	277799	SPBC146.03c	SPBC9B6.11c	cut3	SPBC9B6.11c	smc4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.250101082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791073	2539817	2539420	276367	275985	SPBC146.03c	SPCC970.07c	cut3	raf2	smc4	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.117398432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791074	2539817	2539564	276367	276125	SPBC146.03c	SPCC550.12	cut3	arp6	smc4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.270867776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791075	2539817	2540945	276367	277461	SPBC146.03c	SPBC342.06c	cut3	rtt109	smc4	kat11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.51056709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791076	2539817	2542318	276367	278784	SPBC146.03c	SPAC16C9.05	cut3	cph1	smc4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.77205893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791077	2539817	2539352	276367	275918	SPBC146.03c	SPCC188.07	cut3	ccq1	smc4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.887446786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791078	2539817	2540825	276367	277343	SPBC146.03c	SPBC428.08c	cut3	clr4	smc4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.447018979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791079	2539817	2541926	276367	278414	SPBC146.03c	SPAC222.14c	cut3	SPAC222.14c	smc4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256062252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791080	2539817	2542268	276367	278737	SPBC146.03c	SPAC17A5.07c	cut3	ulp2	smc4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.330304224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791081	2539817	2541801	276367	278292	SPBC146.03c	SPAC2F7.08c	cut3	snf5	smc4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.045451268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791082	2539817	2542513	276367	278971	SPBC146.03c	SPAC1952.05	cut3	gcn5	smc4	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.184130031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791083	2539817	2539733	276367	276285	SPBC146.03c	SPBC16E9.12c	cut3	pab2	smc4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.748365983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791084	2539817	2539903	276367	276449	SPBC146.03c	SPBC15C4.04c	cut3	SPBC15C4.04c	smc4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567352309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791085	2539817	2541496	276367	277998	SPBC146.03c	SPAC23D3.09	cut3	arp42	smc4	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.933821076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791086	2539817	2539250	276367	275820	SPBC146.03c	SPCC1884.02	cut3	nic1	smc4	SPCC757.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331398429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791087	2539817	2542254	276367	278724	SPBC146.03c	SPAC30D11.04c	cut3	nup124	smc4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.268558819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791088	2539817	2541009	276367	277524	SPBC146.03c	SPBC428.04	cut3	apq12	smc4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.972342857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791089	2539817	5802861	276367	857999	SPBC146.03c	SPAC1D4.01	cut3	tls1	smc4	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.69405346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791090	2539817	2541464	276367	277966	SPBC146.03c	SPAC222.08c	cut3	SPAC222.08c	smc4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152673201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791091	2539817	2541959	276367	278446	SPBC146.03c	SPAC23C4.03	cut3	hrk1	smc4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.990758775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791092	2539817	2540342	276367	276871	SPBC146.03c	SPBC2G2.01c	cut3	liz1	smc4	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632851963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791093	2539817	2539812	276367	276362	SPBC146.03c	SPBC1347.02	cut3	fkbp39	smc4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.839499593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791094	2539817	2543254	276367	279682	SPBC146.03c	SPAC1006.03c	cut3	red1	smc4	iss3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.762078814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791095	2539817	2538848	276367	275429	SPBC146.03c	SPCC613.12c	cut3	raf1	smc4	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.782952737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791096	2539817	2540531	276367	277059	SPBC146.03c	SPBC23E6.08	cut3	sat1	smc4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515330109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791097	2539817	2540089	276367	276627	SPBC146.03c	SPBC32H8.01c	cut3	SPBC32H8.01c	smc4	SPBP22H7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511254192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791098	2539817	2541478	276367	277980	SPBC146.03c	SPAC2F7.17	cut3	mrf1	smc4	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193525091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791099	2539817	2543372	276367	279794	SPBC146.03c	SPAPB1A10.09	cut3	ase1	smc4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.510477453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791100	2539817	2540787	276367	277306	SPBC146.03c	SPBC1921.07c	cut3	sgf29	smc4	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256365738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791101	2540434	2542098	276962	278574	SPBC24C6.11	SPAC30D11.01c	cwf14	gto2	-	SPAC30D11.01c|SPAC56F8.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.921673515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791102	2540434	2540919	276962	277435	SPBC24C6.11	SPBC543.07	cwf14	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870168425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791103	2540434	2539310	276962	275877	SPBC24C6.11	SPCC285.17	cwf14	spp27	-	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.584520992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791104	2540434	2540242	276962	276774	SPBC24C6.11	SPBC32F12.07c	cwf14	SPBC32F12.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382979501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791105	2540434	2542883	276962	279328	SPBC24C6.11	SPAC1486.04c	cwf14	alm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.634320125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791106	2540434	2538869	276962	275449	SPBC24C6.11	SPCC777.02	cwf14	SPCC777.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817584256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791107	2540434	2540320	276962	276850	SPBC24C6.11	SPBC3D6.04c	cwf14	mad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.50089142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791108	2539922	2540161	276466	276696	SPBC1773.11c	SPBC13E7.03c	mug89	SPBC13E7.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.054940623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791109	2539922	2542050	276466	278529	SPBC1773.11c	SPAC212.02	mug89	SPAC212.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.644960304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791110	2539922	2540919	276466	277435	SPBC1773.11c	SPBC543.07	mug89	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819445637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791111	2539922	3361520	276466	280596	SPBC1773.11c	SPAC1610.02c	mug89	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816969475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791112	2538778	2542895	275359	279339	SPCC4G3.15c	SPAC13G6.10c	not2	asl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819563508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791113	2538778	2538796	275359	275377	SPCC4G3.15c	SPCC63.06	not2	SPCC63.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386056988	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791114	2538778	2543637	275359	280051	SPCC4G3.15c	SPAC3H8.02	not2	csr102	-	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.49761869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791115	2538778	2542103	275359	278579	SPCC4G3.15c	SPAC31G5.11	not2	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378679004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791116	2538778	2541208	275359	277722	SPCC4G3.15c	SPBC887.04c	not2	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.193058624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791117	2538778	2542848	275359	279294	SPCC4G3.15c	SPAC9G1.03c	not2	rpl3001	-	rpl30|rpl30-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384620547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791118	2538778	2543453	275359	279873	SPCC4G3.15c	SPAC3G9.03	not2	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.910534527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791119	2538778	2540220	275359	276753	SPCC4G3.15c	SPBC337.03	not2	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703013702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791120	2538778	2540727	275359	277250	SPCC4G3.15c	SPBC1921.03c	not2	mex67	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.682732357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791121	2538778	2540851	275359	277368	SPCC4G3.15c	SPBC4F6.04	not2	rpl2502	-	rpl23a-2|rpl25b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386169957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791122	2538778	2543584	275359	279999	SPCC4G3.15c	SPAPB1E7.11c	not2	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852777717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791123	2538778	2539352	275359	275918	SPCC4G3.15c	SPCC188.07	not2	ccq1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327475961	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791124	2538778	2538906	275359	275483	SPCC4G3.15c	SPCC1259.03	not2	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.086404685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791125	2538778	2542981	275359	279419	SPCC4G3.15c	SPAC824.02	not2	bst1	-	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.185755053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791126	2538778	2541926	275359	278414	SPCC4G3.15c	SPAC222.14c	not2	SPAC222.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571950537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791127	2538778	2541021	275359	277536	SPCC4G3.15c	SPBC3B8.10c	not2	nem1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154736613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791128	2538778	2543514	275359	279932	SPCC4G3.15c	SPAC4D7.03	not2	pop2	-	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449229536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791129	2538778	2543020	275359	279456	SPCC4G3.15c	SPAC10F6.13c	not2	SPAC10F6.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321796042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791130	2538778	2541250	275359	277764	SPCC4G3.15c	SPBC8D2.17	not2	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811612942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791131	2538778	2538770	275359	275353	SPCC4G3.15c	SPCC1753.02c	not2	git3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637924795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791132	2538778	2540990	275359	277506	SPCC4G3.15c	SPBC36B7.06c	not2	mug20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815079483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791133	2538778	2539363	275359	275929	SPCC4G3.15c	SPCC613.02	not2	SPCC613.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.777563019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791134	2538778	2541488	275359	277990	SPCC4G3.15c	SPAC227.17c	not2	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808903981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791135	2538778	2541628	275359	278124	SPCC4G3.15c	SPAC110.02	not2	pds5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935695052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791136	2538778	2542725	275359	279176	SPCC4G3.15c	SPAC3A12.10	not2	rpl2001	-	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041080366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791137	2538778	2540910	275359	277426	SPCC4G3.15c	SPBC577.02	not2	rpl3801	-	rpl38-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387496258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791138	2538778	2543628	275359	280042	SPCC4G3.15c	SPAC3H8.10	not2	spo20	-	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638411311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791139	2538778	2543670	275359	280084	SPCC4G3.15c	SPAPB1E7.06c	not2	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699198146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791140	2538778	2541432	275359	277937	SPCC4G3.15c	SPAC1F5.05c	not2	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771924506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791141	2538778	2539668	275359	276223	SPCC4G3.15c	SPBC11B10.10c	not2	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.128739104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791142	2538778	2541404	275359	277913	SPCC4G3.15c	SPBPB2B2.18	not2	SPBPB2B2.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.39089907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791143	2538778	2543044	275359	279479	SPCC4G3.15c	SPAC3C7.12	not2	tip1	-	noc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.918774842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791144	2538778	2539205	275359	275775	SPCC4G3.15c	SPCC4B3.15	not2	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.214377823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791145	2538778	2543337	275359	279760	SPCC4G3.15c	SPAC959.08	not2	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329179534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791146	2538778	2543384	275359	279806	SPCC4G3.15c	SPAC637.06	not2	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.151957417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791147	2538778	2538854	275359	275435	SPCC4G3.15c	SPCP1E11.05c	not2	are2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810927097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791148	2538778	2539085	275359	275657	SPCC4G3.15c	SPCC285.15c	not2	rps2802	-	rps28|rps28-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.43995008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791149	2538778	2542700	275359	279153	SPCC4G3.15c	SPAC26H5.08c	not2	bgl2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504809166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791150	2538778	2543372	275359	279794	SPCC4G3.15c	SPAPB1A10.09	not2	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.194035971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791151	2538778	2542094	275359	278571	SPCC4G3.15c	SPAC29B12.06c	not2	rcd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.982473744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791152	2542140	2542072	278616	278549	SPAC1783.07c	SPAP32A8.03c	pap1	bop1	caf3	SPAP32A8.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.838186854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791153	2542140	2543306	278616	279730	SPAC1783.07c	SPAC56F8.14c	pap1	mug115	caf3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872570084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791154	2542140	2543132	278616	279564	SPAC1783.07c	SPAC8E11.06	pap1	SPAC8E11.06	caf3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.502543779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791155	2542140	2539117	278616	275689	SPAC1783.07c	SPCC74.06	pap1	mak3	caf3	phk2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.482484673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791156	2542140	2542022	278616	278505	SPAC1783.07c	SPAC23A1.03	pap1	apt1	caf3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453279002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791157	2542140	2540425	278616	276953	SPAC1783.07c	SPBC27.06c	pap1	mgr2	caf3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.376994824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791158	2542140	2541663	278616	278159	SPAC1783.07c	SPAC22G7.08	pap1	ppk8	caf3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.053078773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791159	2542140	2539310	278616	275877	SPAC1783.07c	SPCC285.17	pap1	spp27	caf3	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575716241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791160	2542140	2539467	278616	276030	SPAC1783.07c	SPCC417.07c	pap1	mto1	caf3	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505666963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791161	2542140	2540797	278616	277316	SPAC1783.07c	SPBC18H10.11c	pap1	ppr2	caf3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.28164249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791162	2542140	2539898	278616	276444	SPAC1783.07c	SPBC12D12.07c	pap1	trx2	caf3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.259295656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791163	2542140	2540886	278616	277403	SPAC1783.07c	SPBC4F6.10	pap1	vps901	caf3	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.882009598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791164	2542140	2540661	278616	277186	SPAC1783.07c	SPBC23E6.03c	pap1	nta1	caf3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317564257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791165	2542140	2542946	278616	279386	SPAC1783.07c	SPAC6F12.03c	pap1	fsv1	caf3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.772690111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791166	2542140	2540836	278616	277354	SPAC1783.07c	SPBC18H10.19	pap1	vps38	caf3	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.423173283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791167	2542140	2542056	278616	278535	SPAC1783.07c	SPAC6G9.14	pap1	SPAC6G9.14	caf3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.986446637	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791168	2542140	2541708	278616	278203	SPAC1783.07c	SPAC31A2.02	pap1	trm112	caf3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.877300099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791169	2542140	2540180	278616	276713	SPAC1783.07c	SPBC16D10.11c	pap1	rps1801	caf3	rps18-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.439133376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791170	2542140	2540599	278616	277125	SPAC1783.07c	SPBC29A3.10c	pap1	atp14	caf3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392193169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791171	2542140	2540946	278616	277462	SPAC1783.07c	SPBC36.04	pap1	cys11	caf3	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513194781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791172	2542140	2542767	278616	279217	SPAC1783.07c	SPAC1565.07c	pap1	knd1	caf3	SPAC1565.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.127778113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791173	2542140	2543670	278616	280084	SPAC1783.07c	SPAPB1E7.06c	pap1	eme1	caf3	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.188607338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791174	2542140	2542883	278616	279328	SPAC1783.07c	SPAC1486.04c	pap1	alm1	caf3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.13476856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791175	2542140	2542186	278616	278661	SPAC1783.07c	SPAC17C9.14	pap1	SPAC17C9.14	caf3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.986517896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791176	2542140	2539253	278616	275823	SPAC1783.07c	SPCC1827.03c	pap1	SPCC1827.03c	caf3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877087515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791177	2542140	2541806	278616	278297	SPAC1783.07c	SPAC4G8.13c	pap1	prz1	caf3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.710567253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791178	2542140	2543327	278616	279750	SPAC1783.07c	SPAC1D4.06c	pap1	csk1	caf3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383992014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791179	2542140	2538947	278616	275521	SPAC1783.07c	SPCC1682.12c	pap1	ubp16	caf3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.383814785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791180	2542140	2538730	278616	275314	SPAC1783.07c	SPCC31H12.02c	pap1	mug73	caf3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.268454638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791181	2538868	2538796	275448	275377	SPCC132.02	SPCC63.06	hst2	SPCC63.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.835929859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791182	2538868	2543529	275448	279947	SPCC132.02	SPAC4C5.02c	hst2	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64845665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791183	2538868	2540161	275448	276696	SPCC132.02	SPBC13E7.03c	hst2	SPBC13E7.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.266999874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791184	2538868	2539451	275448	276014	SPCC132.02	SPCC63.13	hst2	SPCC63.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781343285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791185	2538868	2539365	275448	275931	SPCC132.02	SPCC24B10.16c	hst2	SPCC24B10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.441171188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791186	2538868	2538906	275448	275483	SPCC132.02	SPCC1259.03	hst2	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708725455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791187	2538868	2539574	275448	276134	SPCC132.02	SPCPB16A4.04c	hst2	trm8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.890911993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791188	2538868	2539448	275448	276011	SPCC132.02	SPCC825.04c	hst2	naa40	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.349896321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791189	2538868	2539052	275448	275625	SPCC132.02	SPCC663.09c	hst2	SPCC663.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442982314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791190	2538868	2538762	275448	275345	SPCC132.02	SPCC306.04c	hst2	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865784642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791191	2538868	2540531	275448	277059	SPCC132.02	SPBC23E6.08	hst2	sat1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.184577995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791192	2538868	2538756	275448	275339	SPCC132.02	SPCC1795.10c	hst2	SPCC1795.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.389426199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791193	2538868	2538827	275448	275408	SPCC132.02	SPCC63.14	hst2	eis1	-	SPCC63.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.760468273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791194	2540825	2542207	277343	278682	SPBC428.08c	SPAC17H9.10c	clr4	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.689175574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791195	2540825	2539050	277343	275623	SPBC428.08c	SPCC11E10.08	clr4	rik1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.225374322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791196	2540825	2540279	277343	276810	SPBC428.08c	SPBC3B8.04c	clr4	SPBC3B8.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.976861996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791197	2540825	2538721	277343	275305	SPBC428.08c	SPCC1494.10	clr4	adn3	-	SPCC70.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504468148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791198	2540825	2542862	277343	279308	SPBC428.08c	SPAC140.03	clr4	arb1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.683502989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791199	2540825	2538961	277343	275535	SPBC428.08c	SPCC285.14	clr4	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.695271453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791200	2540825	2539566	277343	276126	SPBC428.08c	SPCC736.13	clr4	SPCC736.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379739253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791201	2540825	2539452	277343	276015	SPBC428.08c	SPCC70.03c	clr4	SPCC70.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.126702295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791202	2540825	2543287	277343	279712	SPBC428.08c	SPAC9E9.05	clr4	SPAC9E9.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330517693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791203	2540825	2540956	277343	277472	SPBC428.08c	SPBC409.06	clr4	uch2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.999807741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791204	2540825	2542358	277343	278823	SPBC428.08c	SPAC1782.09c	clr4	clp1	-	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.818198737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791205	2540825	2541650	277343	278146	SPBC428.08c	SPAC14C4.12c	clr4	laf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.86621392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791206	2540825	2542378	277343	278842	SPBC428.08c	SPAC1805.04	clr4	nup132	-	Nup133b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.781761339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791207	2540825	2543524	277343	279942	SPBC428.08c	SPAC4D7.07c	clr4	csi2	-	SPAC4D7.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866907221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791208	2540825	2542237	277343	278709	SPBC428.08c	SPAC19E9.02	clr4	fin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.099976306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791209	2540825	2541856	277343	278347	SPBC428.08c	SPAC23H3.08c	clr4	bub3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.061263292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791210	2540825	2540161	277343	276696	SPBC428.08c	SPBC13E7.03c	clr4	SPBC13E7.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567950222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791211	2540825	2541633	277343	278129	SPBC428.08c	SPAC664.01c	clr4	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.558083235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791212	2540825	2543434	277343	279854	SPBC428.08c	SPAC8F11.02c	clr4	dph3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.325526245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791213	2540825	2542103	277343	278579	SPBC428.08c	SPAC31G5.11	clr4	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.892091842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791214	2540825	2540535	277343	277062	SPBC428.08c	SPBC215.01	clr4	SPBC215.01	-	SPBC3B9.20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327989461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791215	2540825	2539226	277343	275796	SPBC428.08c	SPCC16C4.20c	clr4	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.039379308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791216	2540825	2539420	277343	275985	SPBC428.08c	SPCC970.07c	clr4	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.224009704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791217	2540825	2542677	277343	279130	SPBC428.08c	SPAC26F1.10c	clr4	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.382656443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791218	2540825	2540979	277343	277495	SPBC428.08c	SPBC3H7.10	clr4	elp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.403810694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791219	2540825	2539463	277343	276026	SPBC428.08c	SPCC550.11	clr4	SPCC550.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.892789457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791220	2540825	2539249	277343	275819	SPBC428.08c	SPCC1450.05c	clr4	rox3	-	med19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.130689378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791221	2540825	2540919	277343	277435	SPBC428.08c	SPBC543.07	clr4	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.158662572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791222	2540825	2540945	277343	277461	SPBC428.08c	SPBC342.06c	clr4	rtt109	-	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.20519485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791223	2540825	2540306	277343	276836	SPBC428.08c	SPBC2G5.02c	clr4	ckb2	-	SPBC2G5.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.163454483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791224	2540825	2539434	277343	275997	SPBC428.08c	SPCC757.09c	clr4	rnc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.354499733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791225	2540825	2539331	277343	275897	SPBC428.08c	SPCC24B10.09	clr4	rps1702	-	rps17|rps17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.088572501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791226	2540825	2542335	277343	278801	SPBC428.08c	SPAC16E8.12c	clr4	png3	-	SPAC16E8.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.328400448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791227	2540825	2541998	277343	278482	SPBC428.08c	SPAC23A1.09	clr4	SPAC23A1.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.10392465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791228	2540825	2542135	277343	278611	SPBC428.08c	SPAC13A11.04c	clr4	ubp8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.858100883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791229	2540825	2542318	277343	278784	SPBC428.08c	SPAC16C9.05	clr4	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.11117563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791230	2540825	2542277	277343	278746	SPBC428.08c	SPAC17A5.02c	clr4	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.537024139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791231	2540825	2543685	277343	280099	SPBC428.08c	SPAC3C7.03c	clr4	rad55	-	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.52677347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791232	2540825	2539175	277343	275746	SPBC428.08c	SPCC16C4.01	clr4	sif2	-	SPCC5E4.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.612123966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791233	2540825	2539244	277343	275814	SPBC428.08c	SPCC1672.06c	clr4	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.045178131	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791234	2540825	2543584	277343	279999	SPBC428.08c	SPAPB1E7.11c	clr4	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783636161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791235	2540825	2541905	277343	278395	SPBC428.08c	SPAC6G9.01c	clr4	SPAC6G9.01c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.861865072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791236	2540825	2539352	277343	275918	SPBC428.08c	SPCC188.07	clr4	ccq1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.367591724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791237	2540825	2543078	277343	279511	SPBC428.08c	SPAC31A2.15c	clr4	dcc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.938611028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791238	2540825	2538906	277343	275483	SPBC428.08c	SPCC1259.03	clr4	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.06318371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791239	2540825	2541021	277343	277536	SPBC428.08c	SPBC3B8.10c	clr4	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.37574813	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791240	2540825	2542665	277343	279118	SPBC428.08c	SPAC10F6.08c	clr4	nht10	-	nht1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.911397304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791241	2540825	2542554	277343	279011	SPBC428.08c	SPAC1952.03	clr4	otu2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.498176284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791242	2540825	2542568	277343	279024	SPBC428.08c	SPAC1952.02	clr4	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.172634185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791243	2540825	2542239	277343	278711	SPBC428.08c	SPAC18G6.02c	clr4	chp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.047199656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791244	2540825	2539960	277343	276504	SPBC428.08c	SPBC15D4.15	clr4	pho2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.003052886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791245	2540825	2539032	277343	275605	SPBC428.08c	SPCC4B3.05c	clr4	hem12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325977861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791246	2540825	2542036	277343	278518	SPBC428.08c	SPAC23A1.19c	clr4	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.044665297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791247	2540825	2539467	277343	276030	SPBC428.08c	SPCC417.07c	clr4	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.678996089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791248	2540825	2539388	277343	275953	SPBC428.08c	SPCC24B10.12	clr4	cgi121	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.400611349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791249	2540825	2542311	277343	278777	SPBC428.08c	SPAC16A10.05c	clr4	dad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.694084708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791250	2540825	2543514	277343	279932	SPBC428.08c	SPAC4D7.03	clr4	pop2	-	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.074799748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791251	2540825	2542950	277343	279390	SPBC428.08c	SPAC12B10.03	clr4	bun62	-	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.684420513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791252	2540825	2541741	277343	278235	SPBC428.08c	SPAC20G4.02c	clr4	fus1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.244084632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791253	2540825	2543020	277343	279456	SPBC428.08c	SPAC10F6.13c	clr4	SPAC10F6.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.839261595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791254	2540825	2539003	277343	275577	SPBC428.08c	SPCC1442.17c	clr4	ist1	-	SPCC285.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.899402863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791255	2540825	2540631	277343	277157	SPBC428.08c	SPBC25B2.10	clr4	SPBC25B2.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.644662497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791256	2540825	2542513	277343	278971	SPBC428.08c	SPAC1952.05	clr4	gcn5	-	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63334267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791257	2540825	2542646	277343	279100	SPBC428.08c	SPAC11H11.05c	clr4	fta6	-	sma6	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.614080057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791258	2540825	2541982	277343	278467	SPBC428.08c	SPAC23A1.06c	clr4	cmk2	-	mkp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.472051533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791259	2540825	2542707	277343	279160	SPBC428.08c	SPAC25G10.03	clr4	zip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.07760555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791260	2540825	2540429	277343	276957	SPBC428.08c	SPBC29A10.07	clr4	pom152	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.932968116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791261	2540825	3361491	277343	280567	SPBC428.08c	SPAC1805.08	clr4	dlc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037649925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791262	2540825	2540338	277343	276867	SPBC428.08c	SPBC2G2.13c	clr4	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.978479428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791263	2540825	2539984	277343	276528	SPBC428.08c	SPBC1289.11	clr4	spf38	-	cwf17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.143173869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791264	2540825	2542123	277343	278599	SPBC428.08c	SPAC18G6.15	clr4	mal3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.461401727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791265	2540825	2538706	277343	275290	SPBC428.08c	SPCC338.08	clr4	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.089434773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791266	2540825	2542507	277343	278965	SPBC428.08c	SPAC18G6.13	clr4	SPAC18G6.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.046980161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791267	2540825	2543412	277343	279834	SPBC428.08c	SPAC637.07	clr4	moe1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812265821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791268	2540825	2539733	277343	276285	SPBC428.08c	SPBC16E9.12c	clr4	pab2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.859793003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791269	2540825	2540673	277343	277198	SPBC428.08c	SPBC1D7.03	clr4	mug80	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.94003513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791270	2540825	2538800	277343	275381	SPBC428.08c	SPCC1322.06	clr4	kap113	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.880630875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791271	2540825	2539073	277343	275645	SPBC428.08c	SPCC1322.02	clr4	pxd1	-	SPCC1322.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.529735504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791272	2540825	2543208	277343	279637	SPBC428.08c	SPAC328.04	clr4	SPAC328.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.515328583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791273	2540825	2539219	277343	275789	SPBC428.08c	SPCC1795.01c	clr4	mad3	-	SPCC895.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.320399747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791274	2540825	2539484	277343	276047	SPBC428.08c	SPCC594.04c	clr4	SPCC594.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.561676699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791275	2540825	2539454	277343	276017	SPBC428.08c	SPCC622.15c	clr4	SPCC622.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.861957503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791276	2540825	2541496	277343	277998	SPBC428.08c	SPAC23D3.09	clr4	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.789159265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791277	2540825	2541096	277343	277611	SPBC428.08c	SPBC725.10	clr4	SPBC725.10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.433737553	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791278	2540825	2542925	277343	279366	SPBC428.08c	SPAC11E3.04c	clr4	ubc13	-	spu13|sst5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.840694153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791279	2540825	2539603	277343	276161	SPBC428.08c	SPBC1289.06c	clr4	ppr8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.276182016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791280	2540825	2541929	277343	278417	SPBC428.08c	SPAC23C4.12	clr4	hhp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.704567495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791281	2540825	2539857	277343	276404	SPBC428.08c	SPBC1604.20c	clr4	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.346646499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791282	2540825	2543118	277343	279550	SPBC428.08c	SPAC3G6.11	clr4	chl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.483404999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791283	2540825	2539111	277343	275683	SPBC428.08c	SPCC417.11c	clr4	SPCC417.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.33693875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791284	2540825	2541710	277343	278205	SPBC428.08c	SPAC343.11c	clr4	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.092418909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791285	2540825	2541824	277343	278315	SPBC428.08c	SPAC27E2.02	clr4	SPAC27E2.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.439761501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791286	2540825	2542631	277343	279085	SPBC428.08c	SPAC24H6.10c	clr4	SPAC24H6.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.843592583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791287	2540825	2538769	277343	275352	SPBC428.08c	SPCC126.04c	clr4	sgf73	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037795239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791288	2540825	2542007	277343	278490	SPBC428.08c	SPAC20H4.07	clr4	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.30198169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791289	2540825	2543244	277343	279672	SPBC428.08c	SPAC6B12.06c	clr4	rrg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.610337623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791290	2540825	2540751	277343	277273	SPBC428.08c	SPBC20F10.10	clr4	psl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.203470106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791291	2540825	2540961	277343	277477	SPBC428.08c	SPBC36B7.03	clr4	sec63	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.493803551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791292	2540825	2539974	277343	276518	SPBC428.08c	SPBC32H8.07	clr4	git5	-	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.551951821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791293	2540825	2540077	277343	276615	SPBC428.08c	SPBC17D11.04c	clr4	nto1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.174965895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791294	2540825	2541248	277343	277762	SPBC428.08c	SPBC8D2.10c	clr4	rmt3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.565068511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791295	2540825	2539232	277343	275802	SPBC428.08c	SPCC1223.04c	clr4	set11	-	mug76	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.001901285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791296	2540825	2539958	277343	276502	SPBC428.08c	SPBC1718.07c	clr4	zfs1	-	moc4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872977579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791297	2540825	2542254	277343	278724	SPBC428.08c	SPAC30D11.04c	clr4	nup124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.622238647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791298	2540825	2542855	277343	279301	SPBC428.08c	SPAC144.04c	clr4	spe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778447551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791299	2540825	2539481	277343	276044	SPBC428.08c	SPCC622.16c	clr4	epe1	-	kdm2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.153321943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791300	2540825	2539215	277343	275785	SPBC428.08c	SPCC285.16c	clr4	msh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.468090028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791301	2540825	2542056	277343	278535	SPBC428.08c	SPAC6G9.14	clr4	SPAC6G9.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.834335151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791302	2540825	2538949	277343	275523	SPBC428.08c	SPCC320.03	clr4	SPCC320.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.867038984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791303	2540825	2540378	277343	276907	SPBC428.08c	SPBC30D10.18c	clr4	rpl102	-	rpl1-2|rpl10a-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.993935762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791304	2540825	2541389	277343	277900	SPBC428.08c	SPBPB2B2.09c	clr4	SPBPB2B2.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.693725854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791305	2540825	2542951	277343	279391	SPBC428.08c	SPAC1071.05	clr4	SPAC1071.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.343920669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791306	2540825	2541959	277343	278446	SPBC428.08c	SPAC23C4.03	clr4	hrk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.17404706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791307	2540825	2539231	277343	275801	SPBC428.08c	SPCC1672.03c	clr4	SPCC1672.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.275152027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791308	2540825	2542597	277343	279051	SPBC428.08c	SPAP8A3.07c	clr4	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.965333111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791309	2540825	2539363	277343	275929	SPBC428.08c	SPCC613.02	clr4	SPCC613.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323047367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791310	2540825	2542773	277343	279222	SPBC428.08c	SPAC16.01	clr4	rho2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.158680758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791311	2540825	2541266	277343	277780	SPBC428.08c	SPBP16F5.05c	clr4	yar1	-	SPBP16F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.067208214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791312	2540825	2541614	277343	278111	SPBC428.08c	SPAC29A4.20	clr4	elp3	-	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.782018427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791313	2540825	2541565	277343	278063	SPBC428.08c	SPAC1250.03	clr4	ubc14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.710221611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791314	2540825	2538690	277343	275275	SPBC428.08c	SPCC1393.05	clr4	ers1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.164952315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791315	2540825	3361105	277343	280181	SPBC428.08c	SPCC188.10c	clr4	SPCC188.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979411197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791316	2540825	2542255	277343	278725	SPBC428.08c	SPAC57A7.08	clr4	pzh1	-	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.94005755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791317	2540825	2542829	277343	279276	SPBC428.08c	SPAC13D6.02c	clr4	byr3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147628855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791318	2540825	2539812	277343	276362	SPBC428.08c	SPBC1347.02	clr4	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.38463724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791319	2540825	2540193	277343	276726	SPBC428.08c	SPBC1289.10c	clr4	adn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.335525079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791320	2540825	2540005	277343	276549	SPBC428.08c	SPBC1347.09	clr4	SPBC1347.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.140898293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791321	2540825	2541378	277343	277889	SPBC428.08c	SPBP8B7.21	clr4	ubp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.246876714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791322	2540825	2542781	277343	279230	SPBC428.08c	SPAC57A10.12c	clr4	ura3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569282011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791323	2540825	2543515	277343	279933	SPBC428.08c	SPAC4F10.14c	clr4	btf3	-	btt1|egd1|nac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.325398839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791324	2540825	2540589	277343	277115	SPBC428.08c	SPBC20F10.06	clr4	mad2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.268716428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791325	2540825	2540691	277343	277216	SPBC428.08c	SPBC20F10.05	clr4	nrl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377591513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791326	2540825	2538848	277343	275429	SPBC428.08c	SPCC613.12c	clr4	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.057217554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791327	2540825	2542869	277343	279314	SPBC428.08c	SPAC140.02	clr4	gar2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.41781968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791328	2540825	2541628	277343	278124	SPBC428.08c	SPAC110.02	clr4	pds5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.344250678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791329	2540825	2540918	277343	277434	SPBC428.08c	SPBC800.02	clr4	whi5	-	mug54	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703738496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791330	2540825	2539932	277343	276476	SPBC428.08c	SPBC13E7.07	clr4	SPBC13E7.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.569676272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791331	2540825	2539908	277343	276454	SPBC428.08c	SPBC13E7.06	clr4	msd1	-	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.803251087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791332	2540825	2542198	277343	278673	SPBC428.08c	SPAC6F12.09	clr4	rdp1	-	rdr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.794736501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791333	2540825	2541786	277343	278278	SPBC428.08c	SPAC22F3.08c	clr4	rok1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391786162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791334	2540825	2539354	277343	275920	SPBC428.08c	SPCC4F11.03c	clr4	SPCC4F11.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.515871559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791335	2540825	2542516	277343	278974	SPBC428.08c	SPAC2F7.04	clr4	pmc2	-	med1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.961012132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791336	2540825	2543619	277343	280033	SPBC428.08c	SPAC4F10.04	clr4	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.268319491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791337	2540825	2539555	277343	276116	SPBC428.08c	SPCC4B3.08	clr4	lsg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.952153754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791338	2540825	2540619	277343	277145	SPBC428.08c	SPBC25H2.15	clr4	SPBC25H2.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.455423736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791339	2540825	2542286	277343	278754	SPBC428.08c	SPAC1786.01c	clr4	ptl2	-	SPAC1786.01c|SPAC31G5.20c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.915368722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791340	2540825	2543670	277343	280084	SPBC428.08c	SPAPB1E7.06c	clr4	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.307944942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791341	2540825	2543567	277343	279983	SPBC428.08c	SPAC890.03	clr4	ppk16	-	mug92	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.780352595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791342	2540825	2540498	277343	277026	SPBC428.08c	SPBC27.02c	clr4	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.200952866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791343	2540825	2542881	277343	279326	SPBC428.08c	SPAC13F5.03c	clr4	gld1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043688881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791344	2540825	2542541	277343	278998	SPBC428.08c	SPAC1B3.03c	clr4	wis2	-	cyp5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.272910904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791345	2540825	2541372	277343	277883	SPBC428.08c	SPBP8B7.28c	clr4	stc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872949796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791346	2540825	2543662	277343	280076	SPBC428.08c	SPAC9.07c	clr4	SPAC9.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.832648959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791347	2540825	2541531	277343	278031	SPBC428.08c	SPAC25A8.01c	clr4	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.476290238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791348	2540825	2541470	277343	277972	SPBC428.08c	SPAPYUG7.04c	clr4	rpb9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.525316105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791349	2540825	2542418	277343	278881	SPBC428.08c	SPAC1805.07c	clr4	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.957741975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791350	2540825	2540677	277343	277202	SPBC428.08c	SPBC21B10.03c	clr4	ath1	-	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.42555086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791351	2540825	2541036	277343	277551	SPBC428.08c	SPBC3H7.05c	clr4	SPBC3H7.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.378513406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791352	2540825	2539188	277343	275759	SPBC428.08c	SPCC1827.04	clr4	vms1	-	SPCC1827.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.324288916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791353	2540825	2542826	277343	279273	SPBC428.08c	SPAC13G6.09	clr4	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709771918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791354	2540825	2539668	277343	276223	SPBC428.08c	SPBC11B10.10c	clr4	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.664685429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791355	2540825	2541789	277343	278281	SPBC428.08c	SPAC23H4.08	clr4	iwr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.84055353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791356	2540825	2543109	277343	279541	SPBC428.08c	SPAC3G6.09c	clr4	tps2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042581294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791357	2540825	2543633	277343	280047	SPBC428.08c	SPAC3H8.05c	clr4	mms1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.20454362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791358	2540825	2540140	277343	276677	SPBC428.08c	SPBC16C6.08c	clr4	qcr6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.907557357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791359	2540825	2540896	277343	277412	SPBC428.08c	SPBC19C2.13c	clr4	ctu2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4440008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791360	2540825	2543380	277343	279802	SPBC428.08c	SPAC4G9.16c	clr4	rpl901	-	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.39380616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791361	2540825	2539189	277343	275760	SPBC428.08c	SPCC1682.16	clr4	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.604281101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791362	2540825	2541941	277343	278428	SPBC428.08c	SPAC20H4.03c	clr4	tfs1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.171711858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791363	2540825	2542059	277343	278537	SPBC428.08c	SPAC328.06	clr4	ubp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.694766342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791364	2540825	2543513	277343	279931	SPBC428.08c	SPAC821.06	clr4	spn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.416521125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791365	2540825	2543387	277343	279809	SPBC428.08c	SPAPB1E7.02c	clr4	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.248310047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791366	2540825	2542175	277343	278650	SPBC428.08c	SPAC1F3.02c	clr4	mkh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.535444502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791367	2540825	2540314	277343	276844	SPBC428.08c	SPBC2G5.03	clr4	ctu1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.13689831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791368	2540825	2542566	277343	279022	SPBC428.08c	SPAC8C9.12c	clr4	SPAC8C9.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.86945936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791369	2540825	2541491	277343	277993	SPBC428.08c	SPAC2C4.16c	clr4	rps801	-	rps8|rps8-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.982916229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791370	2540825	2541808	277343	278299	SPBC428.08c	SPAC22A12.14c	clr4	SPAC22A12.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.718528363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791371	2540825	2543372	277343	279794	SPBC428.08c	SPAPB1A10.09	clr4	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.724776898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791372	2540825	2542890	277343	279334	SPBC428.08c	SPAC13G6.14	clr4	aps1	-	SPAC24B11.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.762622683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791373	2540825	2542440	277343	278902	SPBC428.08c	SPAC17A2.12	clr4	rrp1	-	SPAC17A2.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.512454311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791374	2540825	2542656	277343	279110	SPBC428.08c	SPAC2E1P3.05c	clr4	SPAC2E1P3.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868633411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791375	2540825	2543646	277343	280060	SPBC428.08c	SPAC821.07c	clr4	moc3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.323668956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791376	2540825	2541875	277343	278365	SPBC428.08c	SPAC22F3.06c	clr4	lon1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449629152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791377	2540825	2541893	277343	278383	SPBC428.08c	SPAC23H4.13c	clr4	SPAC23H4.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.564275132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791378	2540825	2538730	277343	275314	SPBC428.08c	SPCC31H12.02c	clr4	mug73	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.700462463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791379	2542145	2538985	278621	275559	SPAC17C9.09c	SPCC13B11.03c	tim13	SPCC13B11.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328615467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791380	2542145	2539930	278621	276474	SPAC17C9.09c	SPBC1198.11c	tim13	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.755102172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791381	2542145	2540491	278621	277019	SPAC17C9.09c	SPBC28E12.04	tim13	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.441000089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791382	2542145	2539226	278621	275796	SPAC17C9.09c	SPCC16C4.20c	tim13	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.710919327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791383	2542145	2542816	278621	279263	SPAC17C9.09c	SPAC4G8.11c	tim13	atp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.486658026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791384	2542145	2539564	278621	276125	SPAC17C9.09c	SPCC550.12	tim13	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.080828165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791385	2542145	2540425	278621	276953	SPAC17C9.09c	SPBC27.06c	tim13	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.626472798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791386	2542145	2542318	278621	278784	SPAC17C9.09c	SPAC16C9.05	tim13	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.06389703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791387	2542145	2541943	278621	278430	SPAC17C9.09c	SPAC222.07c	tim13	hri2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509874759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791388	2542145	2539667	278621	276222	SPAC17C9.09c	SPBC13G1.08c	tim13	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.275122642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791389	2542145	2542315	278621	278781	SPAC17C9.09c	SPAC16C9.01c	tim13	SPAC16C9.01c	-	SPAC4G8.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.911446707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791390	2542145	2543311	278621	279735	SPAC17C9.09c	SPAC977.15	tim13	SPAC977.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322875592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791391	2542145	2542549	278621	279006	SPAC17C9.09c	SPAC19A8.11c	tim13	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865480828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791392	2542145	2539368	278621	275934	SPAC17C9.09c	SPCC16A11.07	tim13	coq10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.019007694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791393	2542145	2540533	278621	277061	SPAC17C9.09c	SPBC29A10.16c	tim13	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197238982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791394	2542145	2540229	278621	276761	SPAC17C9.09c	SPBC31F10.15c	tim13	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.21891547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791395	2542145	2542453	278621	278914	SPAC17C9.09c	SPAC186.01	tim13	pfl9	-	SPAC186.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.83982238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791396	2542145	3361520	278621	280596	SPAC17C9.09c	SPAC1610.02c	tim13	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.872312782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791397	2542145	3361389	278621	280465	SPAC17C9.09c	SPAC977.13c	tim13	SPAC977.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.063854991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791398	2542145	2543304	278621	279728	SPAC17C9.09c	SPAC6B12.12	tim13	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.413955796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791399	2542145	2538714	278621	275298	SPAC17C9.09c	SPCC330.11	tim13	btb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.316882882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791400	2542145	2540309	278621	276839	SPAC17C9.09c	SPBC21B10.13c	tim13	yox1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.125528308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791401	2542770	2538976	279220	275550	SPAC167.07c	SPCC1840.04	hul5	pca1	SPAC167.07c|SPAC57A7.03c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865142728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791402	2542770	2543311	279220	279735	SPAC167.07c	SPAC977.15	hul5	SPAC977.15	SPAC167.07c|SPAC57A7.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770359211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791403	2542770	2540229	279220	276761	SPAC167.07c	SPBC31F10.15c	hul5	atp15	SPAC167.07c|SPAC57A7.03c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09463754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791404	2542770	2541488	279220	277990	SPAC167.07c	SPAC227.17c	hul5	SPAC227.17c	SPAC167.07c|SPAC57A7.03c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807326383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791405	2542770	2543380	279220	279802	SPAC167.07c	SPAC4G9.16c	hul5	rpl901	SPAC167.07c|SPAC57A7.03c	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576449099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791406	2542770	2541806	279220	278297	SPAC167.07c	SPAC4G8.13c	hul5	prz1	SPAC167.07c|SPAC57A7.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.58166834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791407	2542770	2543472	279220	279892	SPAC167.07c	SPAC959.04c	hul5	omh6	SPAC167.07c|SPAC57A7.03c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712482424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791408	2543324	3361210	279747	280286	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC16E9.16c	vps17	lsd90	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640032872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791409	2543324	2543617	279747	280031	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC4A8.10	vps17	SPAC4A8.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.58404928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791410	2543324	2542723	279747	279174	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC25H1.03	vps17	atg101	-	mug66	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.560345528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791411	2543324	2541343	279747	277854	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBPB2B2.19c	vps17	SPBPB2B2.19c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.271613967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791412	2543324	2543291	279747	279716	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC9E9.04	vps17	SPAC9E9.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.487453638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791413	2543324	2538977	279747	275551	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC1020.06c	vps17	tal1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.050075269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791414	2543324	2539156	279747	275728	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC1450.08c	vps17	wtf16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.032750222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791415	2543324	2543575	279747	279990	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC644.13c	vps17	SPAC644.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.324078669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791416	2543324	2540524	279747	277052	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC21B10.08c	vps17	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775384188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791417	2543324	2539035	279747	275608	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC794.09c	vps17	tef101	-	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.841198849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791418	2543324	2538896	279747	275474	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC584.11c	vps17	SPCC584.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.878210949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791419	2543324	3361561	279747	280637	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC11E3.01c	vps17	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.264294016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791420	2543324	2539939	279747	276483	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC11G11.01	vps17	fis1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647955494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791421	2543324	2539068	279747	275640	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC1442.11c	vps17	SPCC1442.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.742042119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791422	2543324	2541104	279747	277619	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC6B1.03c	vps17	SPBC6B1.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.62891742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791423	2543324	2540410	279747	276938	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC2D10.04	vps17	SPBC2D10.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811589664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791424	2543324	2538732	279747	275316	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC548.07c	vps17	ght1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7441114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791425	2543324	2539350	279747	275916	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC24B10.17	vps17	emp24	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.441195019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791426	2543324	2541082	279747	277597	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC577.11	vps17	SPBC577.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507810845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791427	2543324	2538710	279747	275294	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC1020.12c	vps17	xap5	-	SPCC14G10.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.679192617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791428	2543324	2540535	279747	277062	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC215.01	vps17	SPBC215.01	-	SPBC3B9.20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.02626045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791429	2543324	2539208	279747	275778	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC1450.11c	vps17	cek1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.069029539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791430	2543324	2541408	279747	277916	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBPB2B2.14c	vps17	SPBPB2B2.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.382264894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791431	2543324	2542677	279747	279130	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC26F1.10c	vps17	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.380682644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791432	2543324	2541012	279747	277527	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC3H7.12	vps17	rav2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.697016915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791433	2543324	2539970	279747	276514	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC1773.01	vps17	far8	-	SPBC1773.01|csc3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.914955274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791434	2543324	2539235	279747	275805	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC1682.15	vps17	mug122	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.461722709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791435	2543324	2540029	279747	276573	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC16A3.01	vps17	spn3	-	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.446527099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791436	2543324	2542724	279747	279175	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC767.01c	vps17	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.472596452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791437	2543324	2539576	279747	276136	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC794.01c	vps17	zwf2	-	SPCC794.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189484708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791438	2543324	2540095	279747	276633	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC115.03	vps17	SPBC115.03	-	SPBC839.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.83698948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791439	2543324	2541119	279747	277634	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC651.11c	vps17	apm3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.039852954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791440	2543324	2539988	279747	276532	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC1271.05c	vps17	SPBC1271.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443507617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791441	2543324	2540676	279747	277201	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC3E7.11c	vps17	SPBC3E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.381025283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791442	2543324	2541323	279747	277835	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBP35G2.14	vps17	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.260847364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791443	2543324	2539792	279747	276342	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC1271.14	vps17	SPBC1271.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.325189249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791444	2543324	2540663	279747	277188	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC56F2.06	vps17	mug147	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.636493489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791445	2543324	2541311	279747	277823	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBP8B7.09c	vps17	los1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.823642803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791446	2543324	2539961	279747	276505	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC1198.09	vps17	ubc16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509165183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791447	2543324	2540714	279747	277237	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC19C2.04c	vps17	ubp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.914367416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791448	2543324	2541416	279747	277923	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBCPT2R1.01c	vps17	SPBCPT2R1.01c	-	SPBPB2B2.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.881518821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791449	2543324	2543573	279747	279988	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC869.11	vps17	cat1	-	SPAC922.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582610842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791450	2543324	2539237	279747	275807	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC24B10.13	vps17	skb5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.56377689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791451	2543324	2538876	279747	275455	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC4B3.02c	vps17	SPCC4B3.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.055371619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791452	2543324	2539051	279747	275624	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC1183.11	vps17	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.980948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791453	2543324	2540631	279747	277157	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC25B2.10	vps17	SPBC25B2.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.296482204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791454	2543324	2541615	279747	278112	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC27D7.11c	vps17	SPAC27D7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.438317697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791455	2543324	2543593	279747	280008	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC4G9.10	vps17	arg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387096585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791456	2543324	2539628	279747	276185	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC1604.03c	vps17	SPBC1604.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770526855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791457	2543324	3361491	279747	280567	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC1805.08	vps17	dlc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.628370774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791458	2543324	2542168	279747	278643	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC17A5.16	vps17	ftp105	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.814474714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791459	2543324	2542522	279747	278980	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC19A8.03	vps17	ymr1	-	SPAC19A8.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.682756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791460	2543324	2541183	279747	277697	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC725.14	vps17	arg6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.841347714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791461	2543324	2540661	279747	277186	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC23E6.03c	vps17	nta1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391380723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791462	2543324	2540086	279747	276624	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC16H5.12c	vps17	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.49655196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791463	2543324	2543250	279747	279678	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC3G9.15c	vps17	fcf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781219444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791464	2543324	2539284	279747	275852	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC584.15c	vps17	SPCC584.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.257747466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791465	2543324	2539667	279747	276222	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC13G1.08c	vps17	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.619740431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791466	2543324	2542861	279747	279307	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC13G7.13c	vps17	msa1	-	SPAC6C3.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.750982427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791467	2543324	2540665	279747	277190	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC83.02c	vps17	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.912389504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791468	2543324	2540430	279747	276958	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC25B2.01	vps17	SPBC25B2.01	-	SPBC2G5.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.782783632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791469	2543324	2538873	279747	275452	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC306.11	vps17	SPCC306.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.83998053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791470	2543324	2540751	279747	277273	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC20F10.10	vps17	psl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.911475202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791471	2543324	2540290	279747	276821	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC29A3.02c	vps17	his7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.336355784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791472	2543324	2542419	279747	278882	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC17G6.05c	vps17	bro1	-	SPAC17G6.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.043810539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791473	2543324	2539224	279747	275794	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC16A11.01	vps17	SPCC16A11.01	-	SPCC63.15	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258500744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791474	2543324	2542498	279747	278957	SPAPJ696.01c	SPACUNK4.16c	vps17	SPACUNK4.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.53240277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791475	2543324	2540836	279747	277354	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC18H10.19	vps17	vps38	-	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.816409406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791476	2543324	2538935	279747	275511	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC1682.11c	vps17	ctl1	-	SPCC1682.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.774063476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791477	2543324	2539027	279747	275600	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC1322.08	vps17	srk1	-	mkp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.628185721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791478	2543324	2540530	279747	277058	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC405.05	vps17	atg16	-	SPBC405.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.049987154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791479	2543324	2543683	279747	280097	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAPB1E7.04c	vps17	SPAPB1E7.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.485951927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791480	2543324	2543561	279747	279977	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC922.04	vps17	SPAC922.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.325933403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791481	2543324	2541112	279747	277627	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC725.07	vps17	pex5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510921101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791482	2543324	2538828	279747	275409	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC1020.05	vps17	SPCC1020.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.774240384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791483	2543324	2541296	279747	277808	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBP8B7.06	vps17	rpp201	-	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.249340615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791484	2543324	2539427	279747	275992	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC663.15c	vps17	SPCC663.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.740929768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791485	2543324	2543390	279747	279812	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC631.01c	vps17	acp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.197636097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791486	2543324	2540357	279747	276886	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC2F12.05c	vps17	SPBC2F12.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.74698141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791487	2543324	2538884	279747	275462	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC1393.08	vps17	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.740672467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791488	2543324	2539421	279747	275986	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC794.11c	vps17	ent3	-	SPCC794.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.980911514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791489	2543324	2539213	279747	275783	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC285.10c	vps17	SPCC285.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709174795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791490	2543324	2540930	279747	277446	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC354.10	vps17	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.415770138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791491	2543324	2540703	279747	277227	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC20F10.07	vps17	SPBC20F10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.329125432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791492	2543324	2541525	279747	278025	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC27D7.02c	vps17	SPAC27D7.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.850930894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791493	2543324	2542283	279747	278751	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC27F1.08	vps17	pdt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.301354404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791494	2543324	2539499	279747	276062	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC622.08c	vps17	hta1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390283773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791495	2543324	2543106	279747	279538	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC3A11.13	vps17	SPAC3A11.13	-	SPAC3H5.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935037415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791496	2543324	2543567	279747	279983	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC890.03	vps17	ppk16	-	mug92	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641350065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791497	2543324	2542883	279747	279328	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC1486.04c	vps17	alm1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810984441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791498	2543324	2540779	279747	277298	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC19F8.06c	vps17	meu22	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330710427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791499	2543324	2542915	279747	279357	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC6C3.06c	vps17	SPAC6C3.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577687365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791500	2543324	2539925	279747	276469	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC16H5.13	vps17	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.125138283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791501	2543324	2540800	279747	277319	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC409.20c	vps17	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.67848767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791502	2543324	2540152	279747	276688	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC12C2.03c	vps17	SPBC12C2.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.208174445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791503	2543324	2542541	279747	278998	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC1B3.03c	vps17	wis2	-	cyp5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.115569016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791504	2543324	2540881	279747	277398	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC577.14c	vps17	spa1	-	spa	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387495591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791505	2543324	2539159	279747	275731	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC1235.01	vps17	SPCC1235.01	-	SPCC320.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.97376267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791506	2543324	2543066	279747	279499	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC343.12	vps17	rds1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.912818776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791507	2543324	2539239	279747	275809	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC1020.10	vps17	oca2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636126425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791508	2543324	2538756	279747	275339	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC1795.10c	vps17	SPCC1795.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.358302116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791509	2543324	2539029	279747	275602	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC61.05	vps17	SPCC61.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.556096972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791510	2543324	2540829	279747	277347	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC800.09	vps17	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842847249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791511	2543324	2542222	279747	278695	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC31G5.18c	vps17	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.332493359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791512	2543324	2540629	279747	277155	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC21D10.09c	vps17	rkr1	-	SPBC21D10.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714148753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791513	2543324	2541404	279747	277913	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBPB2B2.18	vps17	SPBPB2B2.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.720491979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791514	2543324	2538795	279747	275376	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC1884.01	vps17	SPCC1884.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.319321589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791515	2543324	2541244	279747	277758	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC8D2.02c	vps17	vps68	-	SPBC8D2.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322336419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791516	2543324	2539736	279747	276288	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC12C2.12c	vps17	glo1	-	SPBC21D10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.199788752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791517	2543324	2540489	279747	277017	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC25H2.03	vps17	SPBC25H2.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712333931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791518	2543324	2539170	279747	275741	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC306.02c	vps17	SPCC306.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.916782136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791519	2543324	2539726	279747	276278	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC13E7.08c	vps17	leo1	-	SPBC13E7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515111927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791520	2543324	2543124	279747	279556	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC3A11.06	vps17	mvp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.774063862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791521	2543324	2543525	279747	279943	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC4A8.14	vps17	SPAC4A8.14	-	prs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.768296314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791522	2543324	2540551	279747	277078	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC23E6.01c	vps17	cxr1	-	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.212493516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791523	2543324	2541357	279747	277868	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBPB7E8.01	vps17	SPBPB7E8.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.407397427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791524	2543324	2539573	279747	276133	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC965.06	vps17	osr2	-	SPCC965.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.917849838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791525	2543324	2538854	279747	275435	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCP1E11.05c	vps17	are2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.743314552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791526	2543324	2540173	279747	276706	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC106.13	vps17	SPBC106.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.042800631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791527	2543324	2541177	279747	277691	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC725.05c	vps17	SPBC725.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.408578643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791528	2543324	2540938	279747	277454	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC365.14c	vps17	uge1	-	gal10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.806607562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791529	2543324	2540310	279747	276840	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC29B5.04c	vps17	SPBC29B5.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378006763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791530	2543324	3361512	279747	280588	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC3C7.01c	vps17	sac12	-	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.754403016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791531	2543324	2541062	279747	277577	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC660.11	vps17	tcg1	-	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197674112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791532	2543324	2540787	279747	277306	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC1921.07c	vps17	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.679616182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791533	2543324	2540798	279747	277317	SPAPJ696.01c	SPBC19C7.01	vps17	mni1	-	SPBC32F12.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.19909887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791534	2542227	2538939	278700	275514	SPAC5H10.13c	SPCC1672.04c	gmh2	SPCC1672.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.131556905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791535	2542227	2542143	278700	278619	SPAC5H10.13c	SPAC17C9.07	gmh2	alg8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.447620853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791536	2542227	2542706	278700	279159	SPAC5H10.13c	SPAC29B12.13	gmh2	SPAC29B12.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931030224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791537	2542227	2540528	278700	277056	SPAC5H10.13c	SPBC18H10.04c	gmh2	sce3	-	tif48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326239318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791538	2542227	2540068	278700	276606	SPAC5H10.13c	SPBC1734.12c	gmh2	alg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.18800261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791539	2542227	2541117	278700	277632	SPAC5H10.13c	SPBC646.13	gmh2	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.681010096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791540	2542227	2540686	278700	277211	SPAC5H10.13c	SPBC21D10.10	gmh2	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.545319595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791541	2542227	2538847	278700	275428	SPAC5H10.13c	SPCC594.06c	gmh2	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.741252897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791542	2542227	2543681	278700	280095	SPAC5H10.13c	SPAC9.02c	gmh2	SPAC9.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381656625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791543	2542227	2540993	278700	277509	SPAC5H10.13c	SPBC342.01c	gmh2	alg6	-	SPBC3F6.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699774148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791544	2542227	2542277	278700	278746	SPAC5H10.13c	SPAC17A5.02c	gmh2	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.481990566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791545	2542227	2542331	278700	278797	SPAC5H10.13c	SPAC1834.05	gmh2	alg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.871016687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791546	2542227	2542177	278700	278652	SPAC5H10.13c	SPAC17H9.08	gmh2	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449308562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791547	2542227	2540797	278700	277316	SPAC5H10.13c	SPBC18H10.11c	gmh2	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.489765936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791548	2542227	2540326	278700	276856	SPAC5H10.13c	SPBC2G5.06c	gmh2	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.444289609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791549	2542227	2539974	278700	276518	SPAC5H10.13c	SPBC32H8.07	gmh2	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.987724517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791550	2542227	2542439	278700	278901	SPAC5H10.13c	SPAC17A5.08	gmh2	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.98708348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791551	2542227	2541053	278700	277568	SPAC5H10.13c	SPBC56F2.10c	gmh2	alg5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320465261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791552	2542227	2543517	278700	279935	SPAC5H10.13c	SPAC3G9.05	gmh2	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712455177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791553	2542227	2540229	278700	276761	SPAC5H10.13c	SPBC31F10.15c	gmh2	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.052052433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791554	2542227	2540946	278700	277462	SPAC5H10.13c	SPBC36.04	gmh2	cys11	-	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.782237376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791555	2542227	2539908	278700	276454	SPAC5H10.13c	SPBC13E7.06	gmh2	msd1	-	mug172	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.843945447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791556	2542227	2542327	278700	278793	SPAC5H10.13c	SPAC16C9.06c	gmh2	upf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575564081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791557	2542227	2542881	278700	279326	SPAC5H10.13c	SPAC13F5.03c	gmh2	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.04248064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791558	2542227	2543304	278700	279728	SPAC5H10.13c	SPAC6B12.12	gmh2	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.122535332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791559	2542227	2539013	278700	275586	SPAC5H10.13c	SPCC364.03	gmh2	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.466793008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791560	2542227	2539359	278700	275925	SPAC5H10.13c	SPCC16C4.06c	gmh2	pus3	-	SPCC16C4.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871399493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791561	2542227	2540208	278700	276741	SPAC5H10.13c	SPBC9B6.03	gmh2	SPBC9B6.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.320388009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791562	2542227	2538730	278700	275314	SPAC5H10.13c	SPCC31H12.02c	gmh2	mug73	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044658359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791563	2542300	2542895	278767	279339	SPAC1687.22c	SPAC13G6.10c	puf3	asl1	SPAC222.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445554641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791564	2542300	2542344	278767	278810	SPAC1687.22c	SPAC1751.01c	puf3	gti1	SPAC222.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.498934287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791565	2542300	2542014	278767	278497	SPAC1687.22c	SPAC20H4.04	puf3	fml2	SPAC222.02c	mfh2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.427874372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791566	2542300	2539958	278767	276502	SPAC1687.22c	SPBC1718.07c	puf3	zfs1	SPAC222.02c	moc4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094296126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791567	2542300	2542550	278767	279007	SPAC1687.22c	SPAC1B3.02c	puf3	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC222.02c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.524317801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791568	2542300	2538916	278767	275493	SPAC1687.22c	SPCC16C4.17	puf3	mug123	SPAC222.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64536225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791569	2542300	2541535	278767	278035	SPAC1687.22c	SPAC12G12.10	puf3	wdr21	SPAC222.02c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.006852421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791570	2542300	2543387	278767	279809	SPAC1687.22c	SPAPB1E7.02c	puf3	mcl1	SPAC222.02c	slr3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.505262106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791571	3361342	2542318	280418	278784	SPBC16D10.07c	SPAC16C9.05	sir2	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517438431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791572	3361342	2539733	280418	276285	SPBC16D10.07c	SPBC16E9.12c	sir2	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.29521612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791573	3361342	2539689	280418	276244	SPBC16D10.07c	SPBC1861.03	sir2	mak10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329521833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791574	3361342	2540599	280418	277125	SPBC16D10.07c	SPBC29A3.10c	sir2	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.67457184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791575	3361342	2541531	280418	278031	SPBC16D10.07c	SPAC25A8.01c	sir2	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.983255694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791576	3361342	2541789	280418	278281	SPBC16D10.07c	SPAC23H4.08	sir2	iwr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.513178979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791577	3361342	2541675	280418	278171	SPBC16D10.07c	SPAC22F8.12c	sir2	shf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.561347841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791578	3361342	2543387	280418	279809	SPBC16D10.07c	SPAPB1E7.02c	sir2	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.452874256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791579	2541185	2539506	277699	276069	SPBC6B1.07	SPCC63.04	prp1	mok14	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.973972374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791580	2541185	2543617	277699	280031	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC4A8.10	prp1	SPAC4A8.10	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987079721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791581	2541185	3361499	277699	280575	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC25H1.09	prp1	mde5	zer1	SPAC4A8.01|meu30	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.08598493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791582	2541185	2541512	277699	278013	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC11E3.08c	prp1	nse6	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093113439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791583	2541185	2542965	277699	279405	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC3G6.04	prp1	rnp24	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.089039142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791584	2541185	2541032	277699	277547	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC3H7.11	prp1	SPBC3H7.11	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.158778191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791585	2541185	2542787	277699	279236	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC9G1.08c	prp1	SPAC9G1.08c	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.335820305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791586	2541185	2539876	277699	276422	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC1734.07c	prp1	trs8502	zer1	SPBC1734.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982707296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791587	2541185	2539008	277699	275581	SPBC6B1.07	SPCC584.03c	prp1	SPCC584.03c	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.533431877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791588	2541185	2540068	277699	276606	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC1734.12c	prp1	alg12	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096539425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791589	2541185	2540161	277699	276696	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC13E7.03c	prp1	SPBC13E7.03c	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.538455731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791590	2541185	2541633	277699	278129	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC664.01c	prp1	swi6	zer1	SPAC824.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.18660211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791591	2541185	2542614	277699	279068	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC1399.04c	prp1	SPAC1399.04c	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.942655696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791592	2541185	2538922	277699	275499	SPBC6B1.07	SPCC16C4.10	prp1	SPCC16C4.10	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.2800773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791593	2541185	2539309	277699	275876	SPBC6B1.07	SPCC4G3.19	prp1	alp16	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984628578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791594	2541185	2541891	277699	278381	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC1F8.03c	prp1	str3	zer1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713220846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791595	2541185	2541361	277699	277872	SPBC6B1.07	SPBP8B7.10c	prp1	utp16	zer1	SPBP8B7.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.97888116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791596	2541185	2540999	277699	277515	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC4B4.04	prp1	SPBC4B4.04	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147992195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791597	2541185	2540015	277699	276559	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC1685.02c	prp1	rps1202	zer1	rps12-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091883611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791598	2541185	2541498	277699	278000	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC227.10	prp1	SPAC227.10	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03597028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791599	2541185	2542724	277699	279175	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC767.01c	prp1	vps1	zer1	SPAC9G1.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.186849258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791600	2541185	2541541	277699	278041	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC1F7.11c	prp1	SPAC1F7.11c	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.972238636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791601	2541185	2540698	277699	277222	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC215.11c	prp1	SPBC215.11c	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981539405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791602	2541185	2542022	277699	278505	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC23A1.03	prp1	apt1	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871346225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791603	2541185	2543609	277699	280023	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC630.05	prp1	gyp7	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.264437839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791604	2541185	2539981	277699	276525	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC1289.09	prp1	tim21	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143233011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791605	2541185	2541105	277699	277620	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC685.02	prp1	exo5	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.236758297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791606	2541185	2543108	277699	279540	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC3A12.13c	prp1	SPAC3A12.13c	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042264934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791607	2541185	2540540	277699	277067	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC23E6.10c	prp1	SPBC23E6.10c	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.878644517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791608	2541185	2539244	277699	275814	SPBC6B1.07	SPCC1672.06c	prp1	asp1	zer1	vip1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048969366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791609	2541185	2541295	277699	277807	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC947.09	prp1	hsp3103	zer1	SPBC947.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.33666564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791610	2541185	2540415	277699	276943	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC30B4.06c	prp1	SPBC30B4.06c	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807382607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791611	2541185	2541663	277699	278159	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC22G7.08	prp1	ppk8	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041481132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791612	2541185	2539092	277699	275664	SPBC6B1.07	SPCC1259.08	prp1	SPCC1259.08	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.320357824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791613	2541185	2540825	277699	277343	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC428.08c	prp1	clr4	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.393518234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791614	2541185	2541020	277699	277535	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC354.04	prp1	SPBC354.04	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048777041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791615	2541185	2541246	277699	277760	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC8E4.02c	prp1	SPBC8E4.02c	zer1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.000923695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791616	2541185	2539023	277699	275596	SPBC6B1.07	SPCC594.05c	prp1	spf1	zer1	spp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.324195535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791617	2541185	2541339	277699	277850	SPBC6B1.07	SPBP4G3.02	prp1	pho1	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809035155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791618	2541185	2539467	277699	276030	SPBC6B1.07	SPCC417.07c	prp1	mto1	zer1	mbo1|mod20	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.157505099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791619	2541185	2541776	277699	278270	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC23H3.05c	prp1	swd1	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.144148112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791620	2541185	2541093	277699	277608	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC646.08c	prp1	SPBC646.08c	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.188030183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791621	2541185	2540192	277699	276725	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC1215.01	prp1	shy1	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98527587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791622	2541185	2538770	277699	275353	SPBC6B1.07	SPCC1753.02c	prp1	git3	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.110003149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791623	2541185	2542776	277699	279225	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC167.01	prp1	ire1	zer1	ppk4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.694730947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791624	2541185	2542507	277699	278965	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC18G6.13	prp1	SPAC18G6.13	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152091858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791625	2541185	2541543	277699	278043	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC5H10.04	prp1	SPAC5H10.04	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.416717909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791626	2541185	2539754	277699	276306	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC16C6.04	prp1	dbl6	zer1	SPBC16C6.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.523863469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791627	2541185	2542160	277699	278636	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC8C9.11	prp1	fra2	zer1	SPAC8C9.11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.431215604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791628	2541185	2541889	277699	278379	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC2F7.03c	prp1	pom1	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045210945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791629	2541185	2540543	277699	277070	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC29A10.06c	prp1	ely5	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.563899598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791630	2541185	2542235	277699	278707	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC18G6.05c	prp1	SPAC18G6.05c	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.144657067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791631	2541185	2542428	277699	278890	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC1805.12c	prp1	uep1	zer1	ubi2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.438595065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791632	2541185	2539857	277699	276404	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC1604.20c	prp1	tea2	zer1	klp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035271495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791633	2541185	2539482	277699	276045	SPBC6B1.07	SPCC417.06c	prp1	mug27	zer1	ppk35|slk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.255435815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791634	2541185	2543236	277699	279664	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC8C9.04	prp1	SPAC8C9.04	zer1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.09453538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791635	2541185	2540391	277699	276919	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC31F10.05	prp1	mug37	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.250988908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791636	2541185	2540387	277699	276915	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC24C6.04	prp1	SPBC24C6.04	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.790455304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791637	2541185	2540599	277699	277125	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC29A3.10c	prp1	atp14	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.319864244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791638	2541185	2539344	277699	275910	SPBC6B1.07	SPCC1672.09	prp1	SPCC1672.09	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816866529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791639	2541185	2542865	277699	279310	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC144.01	prp1	SPAC144.01	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101932824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791640	2541185	2540533	277699	277061	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC29A10.16c	prp1	SPBC29A10.16c	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.696065963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791641	2541185	3361030	277699	280106	SPBC6B1.07	SPCP20C8.03	prp1	SPCP20C8.03	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.031372227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791642	2541185	3361105	277699	280181	SPBC6B1.07	SPCC188.10c	prp1	SPCC188.10c	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.553641686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791643	2541185	2542781	277699	279230	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC57A10.12c	prp1	ura3	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.103741092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791644	2541185	2539519	277699	276081	SPBC6B1.07	SPCC364.05	prp1	vps3	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.160362306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791645	2541185	2541742	277699	278236	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC22H10.09	prp1	SPAC22H10.09	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.083986107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791646	2541185	2539706	277699	276259	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC16G5.13	prp1	ptf2	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090859358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791647	2541185	2541670	277699	278166	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC24H6.13	prp1	SPAC24H6.13	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985282634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791648	2541185	2539476	277699	276039	SPBC6B1.07	SPCC364.04c	prp1	coy1	zer1	SPCC364.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.883309215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791649	2541185	2539809	277699	276359	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC16E9.02c	prp1	SPBC16E9.02c	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924066818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791650	2541185	2543670	277699	280084	SPBC6B1.07	SPAPB1E7.06c	prp1	eme1	zer1	mms4|slx2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930167763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791651	2541185	2539296	277699	275864	SPBC6B1.07	SPCC1235.03	prp1	cue2	zer1	SPCC1235.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98084554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791652	2541185	2539246	277699	275816	SPBC6B1.07	SPCC18.13	prp1	SPCC18.13	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035310327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791653	2541185	2540935	277699	277451	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC359.04c	prp1	pfl7	zer1	SPBC359.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870168995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791654	2541185	2539535	277699	276097	SPBC6B1.07	SPCC364.01	prp1	cif1	zer1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.573313314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791655	2541185	2540304	277699	276834	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC354.13	prp1	rga6	zer1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572099531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791656	2541185	2543329	277699	279752	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC56F8.02	prp1	SPAC56F8.02	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.803280503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791657	2541185	2542418	277699	278881	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC1805.07c	prp1	dad2	zer1	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.141213053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791658	2541185	2539635	277699	276191	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC17D11.03c	prp1	SPBC17D11.03c	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.805903665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791659	2541185	2539772	277699	276323	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC1734.05c	prp1	spf31	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991040757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791660	2541185	2539335	277699	275901	SPBC6B1.07	SPCC1450.16c	prp1	ptl1	zer1	SPCC1450.16c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.863820378	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791661	2541185	2542826	277699	279273	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC13G6.09	prp1	SPAC13G6.09	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.207992635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791662	2541185	2541380	277699	277891	SPBC6B1.07	SPBPB2B2.13	prp1	gal1	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.187339311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791663	2541185	2540267	277699	276798	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC32C12.03c	prp1	ppk25	zer1	kin2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093325003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791664	2541185	2541115	277699	277630	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC660.07	prp1	ntp1	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.336624216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791665	2541185	2539928	277699	276472	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC1604.08c	prp1	imp1	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.636577371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791666	2541185	2542386	277699	278850	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC1805.01c	prp1	ppk6	zer1	SPAPJ736.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041229427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791667	2541185	2539702	277699	276255	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC1604.12	prp1	SPBC1604.12	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.053333122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791668	2541185	2539410	277699	275975	SPBC6B1.07	SPCC4G3.17	prp1	SPCC4G3.17	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.204596641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791669	2541185	2543380	277699	279802	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC4G9.16c	prp1	rpl901	zer1	rpl9-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.938759255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791670	2541185	2539483	277699	276046	SPBC6B1.07	SPCC584.02	prp1	cuf2	zer1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.735586339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791671	2541185	2543684	277699	280098	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC4G8.03c	prp1	SPAC4G8.03c	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987003457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791672	2541185	2538854	277699	275435	SPBC6B1.07	SPCP1E11.05c	prp1	are2	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.573903106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791673	2541185	2543471	277699	279891	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC513.07	prp1	SPAC513.07	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04080483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791674	2541185	2542111	277699	278587	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC1687.14c	prp1	SPAC1687.14c	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930009817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791675	2541185	2541320	277699	277832	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC1271.03c	prp1	SPBC1271.03c	zer1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.814456135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791676	2541185	2540309	277699	276839	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC21B10.13c	prp1	yox1	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.551990367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791677	2541185	2541904	277699	278394	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC22F8.03c	prp1	SPAC22F8.03c	zer1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.27889706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791678	2543611	2542848	280025	279294	SPAC3H5.04	SPAC9G1.03c	aar2	rpl3001	-	rpl30|rpl30-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865116456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791679	2543516	2541552	279934	278051	SPAC4F10.11	SPAC1142.08	spn1	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.072383917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791680	2543516	2542293	279934	278761	SPAC4F10.11	SPAC17G8.14c	spn1	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513175511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791681	2543516	2543339	279934	279762	SPAC4F10.11	SPAC630.13c	spn1	tsc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.086141267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791682	2543516	2541117	279934	277632	SPAC4F10.11	SPBC646.13	spn1	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.325172561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791683	2543516	2540161	279934	276696	SPAC4F10.11	SPBC13E7.03c	spn1	SPBC13E7.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.379684568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791684	2543516	2541345	279934	277856	SPAC4F10.11	SPBP35G2.07	spn1	ilv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382308403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791685	2543516	2543661	279934	280075	SPAC4F10.11	SPAC644.08	spn1	SPAC644.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.077592651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791686	2543516	2542318	279934	278784	SPAC4F10.11	SPAC16C9.05	spn1	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.620682757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791687	2543516	2542981	279934	279419	SPAC4F10.11	SPAC824.02	spn1	bst1	-	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.49677838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791688	2543516	2541250	279934	277764	SPAC4F10.11	SPBC8D2.17	spn1	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.667725561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791689	2543516	2543144	279934	279576	SPAC4F10.11	SPAC3F10.05c	spn1	mug113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.157253828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791690	2543516	2541889	279934	278379	SPAC4F10.11	SPAC2F7.03c	spn1	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.664982422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791691	2543516	2541310	279934	277822	SPAC4F10.11	SPBP18G5.03	spn1	toc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.789892934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791692	2543516	2539715	279934	276268	SPAC4F10.11	SPBC1778.09	spn1	SPBC1778.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.499094123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791693	2543516	2542453	279934	278914	SPAC4F10.11	SPAC186.01	spn1	pfl9	-	SPAC186.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.073395152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791694	2543516	2543136	279934	279568	SPAC4F10.11	SPBC1348.07	spn1	SPBC1348.07	-	SPAC1348.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931581911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791695	2543516	2541100	279934	277615	SPAC4F10.11	SPBC651.04	spn1	SPBC651.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.644172478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791696	2543516	2541432	279934	277937	SPAC4F10.11	SPAC1F5.05c	spn1	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517473584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791697	2543516	2539205	279934	275775	SPAC4F10.11	SPCC4B3.15	spn1	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.965278519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791698	2543516	2541869	279934	278359	SPAC4F10.11	SPAC22F3.13	spn1	tsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.804899063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791699	2539055	2538800	275628	275381	SPCC16A11.13	SPCC1322.06	luc7	kap113	usp106	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642035576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791700	2539055	2538837	275628	275418	SPCC16A11.13	SPCC4B3.03c	luc7	SPCC4B3.03c	usp106	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383495986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791701	2539055	2538841	275628	275422	SPCC16A11.13	SPCC550.03c	luc7	SPCC550.03c	usp106	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.991350563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791702	2539055	2539498	275628	276061	SPCC16A11.13	SPCC645.11c	luc7	mug117	usp106	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447382074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791703	2539055	2538840	275628	275421	SPCC16A11.13	SPCC736.07c	luc7	SPCC736.07c	usp106	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331707812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791704	2539055	2538718	275628	275302	SPCC16A11.13	SPCC4B3.06c	luc7	SPCC4B3.06c	usp106	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780941854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791705	2541177	2539050	277691	275623	SPBC725.05c	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC725.05c	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.547886814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791706	2541177	2540528	277691	277056	SPBC725.05c	SPBC18H10.04c	SPBC725.05c	sce3	-	tif48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980092736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791707	2541177	2538922	277691	275499	SPBC725.05c	SPCC16C4.10	SPBC725.05c	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.740872053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791708	2541177	2541891	277691	278381	SPBC725.05c	SPAC1F8.03c	SPBC725.05c	str3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452378475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791709	2541177	2539045	277691	275618	SPBC725.05c	SPCC1235.05c	SPBC725.05c	fft2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.805405617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791710	2541177	2543681	277691	280095	SPBC725.05c	SPAC9.02c	SPBC725.05c	SPAC9.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.262038669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791711	2541177	2539117	277691	275689	SPBC725.05c	SPCC74.06	SPBC725.05c	mak3	-	phk2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.033269929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791712	2541177	2539064	277691	275636	SPBC725.05c	SPCC126.06	SPBC725.05c	twf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820129842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791713	2541177	2539244	277691	275814	SPBC725.05c	SPCC1672.06c	SPBC725.05c	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781530442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791714	2541177	2540797	277691	277316	SPBC725.05c	SPBC18H10.11c	SPBC725.05c	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.436230077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791715	2541177	2540546	277691	277073	SPBC725.05c	SPBC25B2.06c	SPBC725.05c	btb2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714058819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791716	2541177	2543313	277691	279737	SPBC725.05c	SPAPJ691.03	SPBC725.05c	SPAPJ691.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875619041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791717	2541177	2539603	277691	276161	SPBC725.05c	SPBC1289.06c	SPBC725.05c	ppr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.705861281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791718	2541177	2541381	277691	277892	SPBC725.05c	SPBPJ4664.05	SPBC725.05c	SPBPJ4664.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.837774837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791719	2541177	2541310	277691	277822	SPBC725.05c	SPBP18G5.03	SPBC725.05c	toc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.345133551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791720	2541177	2540086	277691	276624	SPBC725.05c	SPBC16H5.12c	SPBC725.05c	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.751494636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791721	2541177	2540836	277691	277354	SPBC725.05c	SPBC18H10.19	SPBC725.05c	vps38	-	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.740301346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791722	2541177	2542549	277691	279006	SPBC725.05c	SPAC19A8.11c	SPBC725.05c	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383356014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791723	2541177	2541053	277691	277568	SPBC725.05c	SPBC56F2.10c	SPBC725.05c	alg5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381712096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791724	2541177	2540229	277691	276761	SPBC725.05c	SPBC31F10.15c	SPBC725.05c	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770472576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791725	2541177	2538884	277691	275462	SPBC725.05c	SPCC1393.08	SPBC725.05c	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.057239879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791726	2541177	2542407	277691	278871	SPBC725.05c	SPAC19B12.06c	SPBC725.05c	SPAC19B12.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196498487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791727	2541177	2543670	277691	280084	SPBC725.05c	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC725.05c	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381842712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791728	2541177	2543567	277691	279983	SPBC725.05c	SPAC890.03	SPBC725.05c	ppk16	-	mug92	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.665996122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791729	2541177	2543096	277691	279528	SPBC725.05c	SPAC977.05c	SPBC725.05c	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702567398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791730	2541177	2541432	277691	277937	SPBC725.05c	SPAC1F5.05c	SPBC725.05c	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778530308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791731	2541177	2543463	277691	279883	SPBC725.05c	SPAPB21F2.03	SPBC725.05c	slx9	-	SPAPB21F2.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.43448221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791732	2541177	2538730	277691	275314	SPBC725.05c	SPCC31H12.02c	SPBC725.05c	mug73	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.924531073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791733	2541177	2540736	277691	277259	SPBC725.05c	SPBC19F8.02	SPBC725.05c	SPBC19F8.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810340579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791734	3361401	2540913	280477	277429	SPAC1093.03	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC1093.03	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770929491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791735	3361401	2543306	280477	279730	SPAC1093.03	SPAC56F8.14c	SPAC1093.03	mug115	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812353816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791736	3361401	2543132	280477	279564	SPAC1093.03	SPAC8E11.06	SPAC1093.03	SPAC8E11.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517798053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791737	3361401	2542224	280477	278697	SPAC1093.03	SPAC19G12.03	SPAC1093.03	cda1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440283292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791738	3361401	2538806	280477	275387	SPAC1093.03	SPCC1840.09	SPAC1093.03	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.814035703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791739	3361401	2540425	280477	276953	SPAC1093.03	SPBC27.06c	SPAC1093.03	mgr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148989303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791740	3361401	2542177	280477	278652	SPAC1093.03	SPAC17H9.08	SPAC1093.03	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.188564477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791741	3361401	2540797	280477	277316	SPAC1093.03	SPBC18H10.11c	SPAC1093.03	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.186552917	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791742	3361401	2540086	280477	276624	SPAC1093.03	SPBC16H5.12c	SPAC1093.03	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.129602506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791743	3361401	3361389	280477	280465	SPAC1093.03	SPAC977.13c	SPAC1093.03	SPAC977.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.130047871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791744	3361401	2539157	280477	275729	SPAC1093.03	SPCC1919.12c	SPAC1093.03	SPCC1919.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319500997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791745	3361401	2538714	280477	275298	SPAC1093.03	SPCC330.11	SPAC1093.03	btb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.37926303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791746	2540348	2543527	276877	279945	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC4C5.01	exo1	SPAC4C5.01	mut2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.938167835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791747	2540348	2543164	276877	279595	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC3G6.06c	exo1	rad2	mut2	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.5518349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791748	2540348	2541208	276877	277722	SPBC29A10.05	SPBC887.04c	exo1	lub1	mut2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.394561719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791749	2540348	2542273	276877	278742	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC17H9.13c	exo1	SPAC17H9.13c	mut2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.014375362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791750	2540348	2539988	276877	276532	SPBC29A10.05	SPBC1271.05c	exo1	SPBC1271.05c	mut2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038504213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791751	2540348	2542318	276877	278784	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC16C9.05	exo1	cph1	mut2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.522061886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791752	2540348	2541643	276877	278139	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC14C4.13	exo1	rad17	mut2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.896565856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791753	2540348	2542220	276877	278694	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC1A6.03c	exo1	SPAC1A6.03c	mut2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.848686081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791754	2540348	2542558	276877	279014	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC1952.07	exo1	rad1	mut2	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.676910426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791755	2540348	3361391	276877	280467	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC13G6.01c	exo1	rad8	mut2	SPAC5H10.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.686020709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791756	2540348	2542036	276877	278518	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC23A1.19c	exo1	hrq1	mut2	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.93987786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791757	2540348	2542311	276877	278777	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC16A10.05c	exo1	dad1	mut2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.822085608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791758	2540348	2538706	276877	275290	SPBC29A10.05	SPCC338.08	exo1	ctp1	mut2	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.156622697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791759	2540348	2540673	276877	277198	SPBC29A10.05	SPBC1D7.03	exo1	mug80	mut2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.305161123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791760	2540348	2543510	276877	279928	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC30D11.07	exo1	nth1	mut2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.856084254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791761	2540348	2542925	276877	279366	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC11E3.04c	exo1	ubc13	mut2	spu13|sst5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.979195603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791762	2540348	2543643	276877	280057	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC3G9.07c	exo1	hos2	mut2	hda1|phd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.505547348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791763	2540348	2542007	276877	278490	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC20H4.07	exo1	rad57	mut2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.988284603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791764	2540348	2542933	276877	279374	SPBC29A10.05	SPAPYUG7.06	exo1	sdu1	mut2	mug67|hag1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.313147379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791765	2540348	2541900	276877	278390	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC23H4.17c	exo1	srb10	mut2	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.39879439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791766	2540348	2539408	276877	275973	SPBC29A10.05	SPCC576.12c	exo1	mhf2	mut2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816377089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791767	2540348	2542697	276877	279150	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC29B12.05c	exo1	SPAC29B12.05c	mut2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874901689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791768	2540348	2541464	276877	277966	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC222.08c	exo1	SPAC222.08c	mut2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.343766635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791769	2540348	2543517	276877	279935	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC3G9.05	exo1	spa2	mut2	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.435458026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791770	2540348	2541614	276877	278111	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC29A4.20	exo1	elp3	mut2	kat9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867980454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791771	2540348	2541746	276877	278240	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC20G4.04c	exo1	hus1	mut2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.367337275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791772	2540348	2542725	276877	279176	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC3A12.10	exo1	rpl2001	mut2	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044422098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791773	2540348	2539686	276877	276241	SPBC29A10.05	SPBC1734.06	exo1	rhp18	mut2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.184859463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791774	2540348	2543567	276877	279983	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC890.03	exo1	ppk16	mut2	mug92	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.840898664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791775	2540348	2542883	276877	279328	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC1486.04c	exo1	alm1	mut2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574992389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791776	2540348	2543304	276877	279728	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC6B12.12	exo1	tom70	mut2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035598199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791777	2540348	2542940	276877	279381	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC31A2.12	exo1	SPAC31A2.12	mut2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.561276363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791778	2540348	2543219	276877	279647	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC56F8.09	exo1	rrp8	mut2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866534388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791779	2540348	2539136	276877	275708	SPBC29A10.05	SPCC1919.05	exo1	SPCC1919.05	mut2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.89085059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791780	2540348	2540064	276877	276602	SPBC29A10.05	SPBC1718.02	exo1	hop1	mut2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.345370142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791781	2540348	2540992	276877	277508	SPBC29A10.05	SPBC342.05	exo1	crb2	mut2	rhp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.779399921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791782	2540348	2541806	276877	278297	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC4G8.13c	exo1	prz1	mut2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.947682113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791783	2540348	2541869	276877	278359	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC22F3.13	exo1	tsc1	mut2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.398856096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791784	2540348	2541478	276877	277980	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC2F7.17	exo1	mrf1	mut2	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.874141437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791785	2540348	2542561	276877	279017	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC31G5.17c	exo1	rps1001	mut2	rps10-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809499081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791786	2540348	2542094	276877	278571	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC29B12.06c	exo1	rcd1	mut2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.875586136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791787	2540122	2542577	276659	279033	SPBC1778.03c	SPAC19G12.15c	SPBC1778.03c	tpp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145280995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791788	2540122	2541145	276659	277660	SPBC1778.03c	SPBC651.12c	SPBC1778.03c	dbl7	-	SPBC651.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.937623521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791789	2540122	2541570	276659	278067	SPBC1778.03c	SPAC6G9.09c	SPBC1778.03c	rpl2401	-	rpl24|rpl24-01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322856044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791790	2540122	2543584	276659	279999	SPBC1778.03c	SPAPB1E7.11c	SPBC1778.03c	SPAPB1E7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515479477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791791	2540122	2540415	276659	276943	SPBC1778.03c	SPBC30B4.06c	SPBC1778.03c	SPBC30B4.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.690092235	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791792	2540122	2540797	276659	277316	SPBC1778.03c	SPBC18H10.11c	SPBC1778.03c	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.302031822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791793	2540122	2539667	276659	276222	SPBC1778.03c	SPBC13G1.08c	SPBC1778.03c	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.051980763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791794	2540122	2540327	276659	276857	SPBC1778.03c	SPBC31F10.07	SPBC1778.03c	lsb5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.97668466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791795	2540122	2541142	276659	277657	SPBC1778.03c	SPBC725.04	SPBC1778.03c	SPBC725.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.14768884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791796	2540122	2540229	276659	276761	SPBC1778.03c	SPBC31F10.15c	SPBC1778.03c	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574252063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791797	2540122	2540193	276659	276726	SPBC1778.03c	SPBC1289.10c	SPBC1778.03c	adn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388068583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791798	2540122	2540946	276659	277462	SPBC1778.03c	SPBC36.04	SPBC1778.03c	cys11	-	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.057087176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791799	2540122	2540829	276659	277347	SPBC1778.03c	SPBC800.09	SPBC1778.03c	sum2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932808708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791800	2540122	2538795	276659	275376	SPBC1778.03c	SPCC1884.01	SPBC1778.03c	SPCC1884.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504209221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791801	2540122	2542442	276659	278904	SPBC1778.03c	SPACUNK12.02c	SPBC1778.03c	cmk1	-	CaMK-I|SPAC25D11.02C	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931138373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791802	2540122	2543387	276659	279809	SPBC1778.03c	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC1778.03c	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.743762952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791803	2540122	2541478	276659	277980	SPBC1778.03c	SPAC2F7.17	SPBC1778.03c	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038041019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791804	2540122	2538730	276659	275314	SPBC1778.03c	SPCC31H12.02c	SPBC1778.03c	mug73	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.975729151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791805	2542440	2542895	278902	279339	SPAC17A2.12	SPAC13G6.10c	rrp1	asl1	SPAC17A2.12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868071211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791806	2542440	2542378	278902	278842	SPAC17A2.12	SPAC1805.04	rrp1	nup132	SPAC17A2.12	Nup133b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.883851834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791807	2542440	2541345	278902	277856	SPAC17A2.12	SPBP35G2.07	rrp1	ilv1	SPAC17A2.12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924844161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791808	2542440	2539988	278902	276532	SPAC17A2.12	SPBC1271.05c	rrp1	SPBC1271.05c	SPAC17A2.12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987576212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791809	2542440	2543563	278902	279979	SPAC17A2.12	SPAC664.02c	rrp1	arp8	SPAC17A2.12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03483925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791810	2542440	2540825	278902	277343	SPAC17A2.12	SPBC428.08c	rrp1	clr4	SPAC17A2.12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.512454311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791811	2542440	2539310	278902	275877	SPAC17A2.12	SPCC285.17	rrp1	spp27	SPAC17A2.12	uaf30	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.996564172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791812	2542440	2542123	278902	278599	SPAC17A2.12	SPAC18G6.15	rrp1	mal3	SPAC17A2.12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.304868686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791813	2542440	2540363	278902	276892	SPAC17A2.12	SPBC2F12.09c	rrp1	atf21	SPAC17A2.12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.327348292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791814	2542440	2539073	278902	275645	SPAC17A2.12	SPCC1322.02	rrp1	pxd1	SPAC17A2.12	SPCC1322.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985963647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791815	2542440	2540628	278902	277154	SPAC17A2.12	SPBC25B2.08	rrp1	SPBC25B2.08	SPAC17A2.12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455508225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791816	2542440	2540077	278902	276615	SPAC17A2.12	SPBC17D11.04c	rrp1	nto1	SPAC17A2.12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.029868652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791817	2542440	2539936	278902	276480	SPAC17A2.12	SPBC1685.05	rrp1	SPBC1685.05	SPAC17A2.12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.402152785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791818	2542440	2538828	278902	275409	SPAC17A2.12	SPCC1020.05	rrp1	SPCC1020.05	SPAC17A2.12	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781633333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791819	2542440	2540533	278902	277061	SPAC17A2.12	SPBC29A10.16c	rrp1	SPBC29A10.16c	SPAC17A2.12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147248132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791820	2542440	3361134	278902	280210	SPAC17A2.12	SPCC737.09c	rrp1	hmt1	SPAC17A2.12	SPCC74.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875966105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791821	2542440	2541963	278902	278449	SPAC17A2.12	SPAC21E11.04	rrp1	aca1	SPAC17A2.12	ppr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147325305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791822	2542440	3361520	278902	280596	SPAC17A2.12	SPAC1610.02c	rrp1	SPAC1610.02c	SPAC17A2.12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812202238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791823	2542440	2541713	278902	278208	SPAC17A2.12	SPAC3A12.12	rrp1	atp11	SPAC17A2.12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.020227386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791824	2542440	2540498	278902	277026	SPAC17A2.12	SPBC27.02c	rrp1	ask1	SPAC17A2.12	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.851111511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791825	2542440	2539925	278902	276469	SPAC17A2.12	SPBC16H5.13	rrp1	SPBC16H5.13	SPAC17A2.12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.844801876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791826	2542440	2543304	278902	279728	SPAC17A2.12	SPAC6B12.12	rrp1	tom70	SPAC17A2.12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.617225426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791827	2542440	2541358	278902	277869	SPAC17A2.12	SPBP4H10.16c	rrp1	SPBP4H10.16c	SPAC17A2.12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.5625659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791828	2542440	2541531	278902	278031	SPAC17A2.12	SPAC25A8.01c	rrp1	fft3	SPAC17A2.12	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.345874123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791829	2542440	2541380	278902	277891	SPAC17A2.12	SPBPB2B2.13	rrp1	gal1	SPAC17A2.12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.885291763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791830	2542440	2541806	278902	278297	SPAC17A2.12	SPAC4G8.13c	rrp1	prz1	SPAC17A2.12	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.328688312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791831	2543214	2540150	279643	276687	SPAC6F12.06	SPBC16E9.14c	SPAC6F12.06	zrg17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386687707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791832	2543214	2539293	279643	275861	SPAC6F12.06	SPCC553.08c	SPAC6F12.06	ria1	-	SPCC553.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439878927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791833	2543214	2540787	279643	277306	SPAC6F12.06	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC6F12.06	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.063648223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791834	2543100	2541345	279532	277856	SPAC12B10.14c	SPBP35G2.07	tea5	ilv1	ppk2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51249853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791835	2543100	2541205	279532	277719	SPAC12B10.14c	SPBC839.02	tea5	SPBC839.02	ppk2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.680759883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791836	2543100	2540727	279532	277250	SPAC12B10.14c	SPBC1921.03c	tea5	mex67	ppk2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.322894044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791837	2543100	2540797	279532	277316	SPAC12B10.14c	SPBC18H10.11c	tea5	ppr2	ppk2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.122444796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791838	2543100	2541889	279532	278379	SPAC12B10.14c	SPAC2F7.03c	tea5	pom1	ppk2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632945282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791839	2543100	2539603	279532	276161	SPAC12B10.14c	SPBC1289.06c	tea5	ppr8	ppk2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643033605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791840	2543100	2538841	279532	275422	SPAC12B10.14c	SPCC550.03c	tea5	SPCC550.03c	ppk2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.257727312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791841	2543100	2542549	279532	279006	SPAC12B10.14c	SPAC19A8.11c	tea5	SPAC19A8.11c	ppk2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844886062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791842	2543100	2543119	279532	279551	SPAC12B10.14c	SPAC3A11.07	tea5	nde2	ppk2	SPAC3A11.07	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.849513765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791843	2543100	2541337	279532	277848	SPAC12B10.14c	SPBP35G2.13c	tea5	swc2	ppk2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.157405416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791844	2543100	2538848	279532	275429	SPAC12B10.14c	SPCC613.12c	tea5	raf1	ppk2	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779521868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791845	2543100	2539160	279532	275732	SPAC12B10.14c	SPCC18.17c	tea5	SPCC18.17c	ppk2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.882512698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791846	2543100	3361389	279532	280465	SPAC12B10.14c	SPAC977.13c	tea5	SPAC977.13c	ppk2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.908625341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791847	2543100	2539555	279532	276116	SPAC12B10.14c	SPCC4B3.08	tea5	lsg1	ppk2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986657648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791848	2543100	2539246	279532	275816	SPAC12B10.14c	SPCC18.13	tea5	SPCC18.13	ppk2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.30191828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791849	2543100	2538714	279532	275298	SPAC12B10.14c	SPCC330.11	tea5	btb1	ppk2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330456136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791850	2543100	2541531	279532	278031	SPAC12B10.14c	SPAC25A8.01c	tea5	fft3	ppk2	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.800011869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791851	2543100	2539205	279532	275775	SPAC12B10.14c	SPCC4B3.15	tea5	mid1	ppk2	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.330996007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791852	2543100	2543337	279532	279760	SPAC12B10.14c	SPAC959.08	tea5	rpl2102	ppk2	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510378273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791853	2543100	2541806	279532	278297	SPAC12B10.14c	SPAC4G8.13c	tea5	prz1	ppk2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.135899027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791854	2543100	2541050	279532	277565	SPAC12B10.14c	SPBC428.05c	tea5	arg12	ppk2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.100197763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791855	2542469	2538939	278930	275514	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC1672.04c	erg5	SPCC1672.04c	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.198740728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791856	2542469	2539147	278930	275719	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC622.12c	erg5	gdh1	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.192528755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791857	2542469	2542895	278930	279339	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC13G6.10c	erg5	asl1	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.492925127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791858	2542469	2540556	278930	277083	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC19F8.04c	erg5	lcl3	cyp61	SPBC19F8.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040584466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791859	2542469	2540060	278930	276598	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC106.01	erg5	mph1	cyp61	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.501419822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791860	2542469	2541343	278930	277854	SPAC19A8.04	SPBPB2B2.19c	erg5	SPBPB2B2.19c	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.956039015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791861	2542469	2540913	278930	277429	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC56F2.08c	erg5	SPBC56F2.08c	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.804508001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791862	2542469	2543306	278930	279730	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC56F8.14c	erg5	mug115	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455906022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791863	2542469	2539492	278930	276055	SPAC19A8.04	SPCPB16A4.06c	erg5	SPCPB16A4.06c	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.18336874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791864	2542469	2543064	278930	279497	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC3G6.01	erg5	hrp3	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.407892448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791865	2542469	2540131	278930	276668	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC1778.05c	erg5	SPBC1778.05c	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.814986463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791866	2542469	2539156	278930	275728	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC1450.08c	erg5	wtf16	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.503962905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791867	2542469	2540524	278930	277052	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC21B10.08c	erg5	SPBC21B10.08c	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.701865848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791868	2542469	2539035	278930	275608	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC794.09c	erg5	tef101	cyp61	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.645182204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791869	2542469	2539068	278930	275640	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC1442.11c	erg5	SPCC1442.11c	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329585304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791870	2542469	2541002	278930	277517	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC3E7.07c	erg5	SPBC3E7.07c	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982633901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791871	2542469	2541117	278930	277632	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC646.13	erg5	sds23	cyp61	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.385626142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791872	2542469	5802945	278930	858083	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC19G12.16c	erg5	adg2	cyp61	SPAC23A1.01c|mug46	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.140183872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791873	2542469	2540491	278930	277019	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC28E12.04	erg5	SPBC28E12.04	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.342318426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791874	2542469	2543320	278930	279744	SPAC19A8.04	SPAPJ695.01c	erg5	SPAPJ695.01c	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.69050492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791875	2542469	2540975	278930	277491	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC354.12	erg5	gpd3	cyp61	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377899075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791876	2542469	2541200	278930	277714	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC8D2.03c	erg5	hhf2	cyp61	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.529114751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791877	2542469	2542107	278930	278583	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC30.01c	erg5	sec72	cyp61	sec7b|sec702	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1486895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791878	2542469	2542677	278930	279130	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC26F1.10c	erg5	pyp1	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.40970407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791879	2542469	2539970	278930	276514	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC1773.01	erg5	far8	cyp61	SPBC1773.01|csc3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982187825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791880	2542469	2538847	278930	275428	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC594.06c	erg5	SPCC594.06c	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810840796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791881	2542469	2541019	278930	277534	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC3B8.07c	erg5	dsd1	cyp61	SDCB3B8.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780299059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791882	2542469	2539510	278930	276072	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC4G3.04c	erg5	coq5	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.184258036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791883	2542469	2540251	278930	276783	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC336.05c	erg5	SPBC336.05c	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.843809823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791884	2542469	2539235	278930	275805	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC1682.15	erg5	mug122	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.298056374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791885	2542469	2543590	278930	280005	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC4C5.03	erg5	SPAC4C5.03	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.316925144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791886	2542469	2540029	278930	276573	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC16A3.01	erg5	spn3	cyp61	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.568326746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791887	2542469	2543681	278930	280095	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC9.02c	erg5	SPAC9.02c	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.151262714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791888	2542469	2540919	278930	277435	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC543.07	erg5	pek1	cyp61	mkk1|skh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.395327882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791889	2542469	2541026	278930	277541	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC337.09	erg5	erg28	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57556805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791890	2542469	2542022	278930	278505	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC23A1.03	erg5	apt1	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574435086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791891	2542469	2541560	278930	278059	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC24B11.12c	erg5	SPAC24B11.12c	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.557989386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791892	2542469	2541527	278930	278027	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC31A2.09c	erg5	apm4	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637862036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791893	2542469	2542969	278930	279409	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC4G8.10	erg5	gos1	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388679912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791894	2542469	2541597	278930	278094	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC29E6.09	erg5	SPAC29E6.09	cyp61	SPAC30.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865263807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791895	2542469	2542220	278930	278694	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC1A6.03c	erg5	SPAC1A6.03c	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.845668567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791896	2542469	2543551	278930	279968	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC4G8.06c	erg5	trm12	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.518052661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791897	2542469	2538698	278930	275283	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC1442.02	erg5	SPCC1442.02	cyp61	SPCC1450.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.319378609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791898	2542469	2541416	278930	277923	SPAC19A8.04	SPBCPT2R1.01c	erg5	SPBCPT2R1.01c	cyp61	SPBPB2B2.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.81035453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791899	2542469	2538972	278930	275546	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC1739.15	erg5	wtf21	cyp61	wtf3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.124248641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791900	2542469	2539381	278930	275947	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC1739.10	erg5	mug33	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.540672907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791901	2542469	2541021	278930	277536	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC3B8.10c	erg5	nem1	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510846851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791902	2542469	2540964	278930	277480	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC365.16	erg5	SPBC365.16	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.571915346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791903	2542469	2543573	278930	279988	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC869.11	erg5	cat1	cyp61	SPAC922.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449369448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791904	2542469	2539023	278930	275596	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC594.05c	erg5	spf1	cyp61	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.896487258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791905	2542469	2541379	278930	277890	SPAC19A8.04	SPBP8B7.27	erg5	mug30	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.837915962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791906	2542469	2543514	278930	279932	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC4D7.03	erg5	pop2	cyp61	sud1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039265128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791907	2542469	2538876	278930	275455	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC4B3.02c	erg5	SPCC4B3.02c	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448842757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791908	2542469	2539051	278930	275624	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC1183.11	erg5	msy1	cyp61	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.05212849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791909	2542469	2543020	278930	279456	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC10F6.13c	erg5	SPAC10F6.13c	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507172353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791910	2542469	2540797	278930	277316	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC18H10.11c	erg5	ppr2	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.316725726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791911	2542469	2541801	278930	278292	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC2F7.08c	erg5	snf5	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.63919753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791912	2542469	2541250	278930	277764	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC8D2.17	erg5	gmh4	cyp61	SPBC8D2.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.56793153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791913	2542469	2542298	278930	278765	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC29A4.02c	erg5	SPAC29A4.02c	cyp61	tef3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.894672861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791914	2542469	2542513	278930	278971	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC1952.05	erg5	gcn5	cyp61	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632235243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791915	2542469	2542652	278930	279106	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC1687.15	erg5	gsk3	cyp61	skp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.899014579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791916	2542469	2541160	278930	277675	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC725.09c	erg5	hob3	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.544293402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791917	2542469	2540338	278930	276867	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC2G2.13c	erg5	dcd1	cyp61	SPBC2G2.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.507546096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791918	2542469	2542699	278930	279152	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC5H10.07	erg5	SPAC5H10.07	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872259229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791919	2542469	2542921	278930	279362	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC1093.01	erg5	ppr5	cyp61	SPAC12B10.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.811546777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791920	2542469	2543313	278930	279737	SPAC19A8.04	SPAPJ691.03	erg5	SPAPJ691.03	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098243232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791921	2542469	2541166	278930	277681	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC725.15	erg5	ura5	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03850745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791922	2542469	2540452	278930	276980	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC2A9.11c	erg5	iss9	cyp61	SPBC2A9.11c|SPBC2D10.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98193933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791923	2542469	2540086	278930	276624	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC16H5.12c	erg5	SPBC16H5.12c	cyp61	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.764338246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791924	2542469	2541187	278930	277701	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC776.14	erg5	plh1	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.833877734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791925	2542469	2538769	278930	275352	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC126.04c	erg5	sgf73	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.813007031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791926	2542469	2542126	278930	278602	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC1B3.05	erg5	not3	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.343959149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791927	2542469	2539000	278930	275574	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC1450.06c	erg5	grx3	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.841663106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791928	2542469	2542528	278930	278986	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC1B3.08	erg5	SPAC1B3.08	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.167974612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791929	2542469	2540665	278930	277190	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC83.02c	erg5	rpl4302	cyp61	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.477449209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791930	2542469	2539850	278930	276398	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC15D4.07c	erg5	atg9	cyp61	apg9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046249208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791931	2542469	2540318	278930	276848	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC30B4.04c	erg5	sol1	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.278704362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791932	2542469	2539027	278930	275600	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC1322.08	erg5	srk1	cyp61	mkp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.553561025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791933	2542469	2541389	278930	277900	SPAC19A8.04	SPBPB2B2.09c	erg5	SPBPB2B2.09c	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449250912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791934	2542469	2542008	278930	278491	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC2G11.07c	erg5	ptc3	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.896609713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791935	2542469	2538708	278930	275292	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC594.01	erg5	SPCC594.01	cyp61	SPCC736.16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.868795338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791936	2542469	2540201	278930	276734	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC13A2.04c	erg5	ptr2	cyp61	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.502207435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791937	2542469	2540184	278930	276717	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC106.12c	erg5	SPBC106.12c	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.914301984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791938	2542469	2539427	278930	275992	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC663.15c	erg5	SPCC663.15c	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05140761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791939	2542469	2539344	278930	275910	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC1672.09	erg5	SPCC1672.09	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38249916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791940	2542469	2543331	278930	279754	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC56E4.07	erg5	SPAC56E4.07	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.122447257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791941	2542469	2540229	278930	276761	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC31F10.15c	erg5	atp15	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147265282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791942	2542469	2540357	278930	276886	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC2F12.05c	erg5	SPBC2F12.05c	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.815595974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791943	2542469	2541927	278930	278415	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC222.12c	erg5	atp2	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.628577373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791944	2542469	2538884	278930	275462	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC1393.08	erg5	SPCC1393.08	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.48678107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791945	2542469	2543009	278930	279447	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC10F6.06	erg5	vip1	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093782676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791946	2542469	2539527	278930	276089	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC338.16	erg5	pof3	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809709744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791947	2542469	2542283	278930	278751	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC27F1.08	erg5	pdt1	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.074476267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791948	2542469	2541409	278930	277917	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC1271.06c	erg5	mug96	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864613258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791949	2542469	2540442	278930	276970	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC25B2.04c	erg5	mtg1	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.928663738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791950	2542469	2541156	278930	277671	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC685.07c	erg5	rpl2701	cyp61	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513800215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791951	2542469	2541370	278930	277881	SPAC19A8.04	SPBP8B7.07c	erg5	set6	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991105678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791952	2542469	2540519	278930	277047	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC21C3.14c	erg5	SPBC21C3.14c	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.263569304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791953	2542469	2543619	278930	280033	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC4F10.04	erg5	ypa1	cyp61	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.051632513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791954	2542469	2539137	278930	275709	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC1682.08c	erg5	mcp2	cyp61	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.907116772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791955	2542469	2543567	278930	279983	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC890.03	erg5	ppk16	cyp61	mug92	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.890709454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791956	2542469	2540531	278930	277059	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC23E6.08	erg5	sat1	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844834064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791957	2542469	2538962	278930	275536	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC965.13	erg5	SPCC965.13	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.380613124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791958	2542469	2541279	278930	277792	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC8E4.03	erg5	SPBC8E4.03	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.978064536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791959	2542469	2541432	278930	277937	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC1F5.05c	erg5	mso1	cyp61	SPAC1F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091503073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791960	2542469	2539239	278930	275809	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC1020.10	erg5	oca2	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.015772747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791961	2542469	2539013	278930	275586	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC364.03	erg5	rpl1702	cyp61	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572889964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791962	2542469	2540000	278930	276544	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC1683.13c	erg5	cha4	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985523333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791963	2542469	2541404	278930	277913	SPAC19A8.04	SPBPB2B2.18	erg5	SPBPB2B2.18	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.839971225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791964	2542469	2540516	278930	277044	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC21C3.01c	erg5	vps13a	cyp61	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.639469117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791965	2542469	2539998	278930	276542	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC16G5.03	erg5	SPBC16G5.03	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.942510842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791966	2542469	2540245	278930	276777	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC31F10.17c	erg5	SPBC31F10.17c	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81715121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791967	2542469	2542250	278930	278720	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC17D4.03c	erg5	cis4	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820844471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791968	2542469	2540489	278930	277017	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC25H2.03	erg5	SPBC25H2.03	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.910153144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791969	2542469	2539205	278930	275775	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC4B3.15	erg5	mid1	cyp61	dmf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.033078686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791970	2542469	2540563	278930	277090	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC25H2.09	erg5	SPBC25H2.09	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195741977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791971	2542469	5802702	278930	857840	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC1235.15	erg5	dga1	cyp61	SPCC548.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866022197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791972	2542469	2539375	278930	275941	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC4G3.11	erg5	mug154	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.296978538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791973	2542469	2540551	278930	277078	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC23E6.01c	erg5	cxr1	cyp61	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.669186381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791974	2542469	2538840	278930	275421	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC736.07c	erg5	SPCC736.07c	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330432507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791975	2542469	2541238	278930	277752	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC8E4.05c	erg5	SPBC8E4.05c	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.440395146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791976	2542469	2541129	278930	277644	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC713.11c	erg5	pmp3	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.130883501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791977	2542469	2543384	278930	279806	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC637.06	erg5	gmh5	cyp61	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.401869189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791978	2542469	2543684	278930	280098	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC4G8.03c	erg5	SPAC4G8.03c	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816309797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791979	2542469	2538854	278930	275435	SPAC19A8.04	SPCP1E11.05c	erg5	are2	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.51766627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791980	2542469	2541867	278930	278357	SPAC19A8.04	SPAC22E12.14c	erg5	sck2	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.789344154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791981	2542469	2541320	278930	277832	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC1271.03c	erg5	SPBC1271.03c	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.918779467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791982	2542469	2543090	278930	279523	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC1348.01	erg5	SPBC1348.01	cyp61	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.817878537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791983	2542469	2542943	278930	279384	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC1348.03	erg5	SPBC1348.03	cyp61	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.625856264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791984	2542469	2540208	278930	276741	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC9B6.03	erg5	SPBC9B6.03	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447434617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791985	2542469	2541228	278930	277742	SPAC19A8.04	SPBP16F5.08c	erg5	SPBP16F5.08c	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980146319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791986	2542469	2540320	278930	276850	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC3D6.04c	erg5	mad1	cyp61	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.773183719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791987	2542469	2541260	278930	277774	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC902.05c	erg5	idh2	cyp61	glu2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090275206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791988	2542469	2539001	278930	275575	SPAC19A8.04	SPCC1494.08c	erg5	SPCC1494.08c	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092868151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791989	2542469	2540736	278930	277259	SPAC19A8.04	SPBC19F8.02	erg5	SPBC19F8.02	cyp61	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820041876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791990	2541574	2543406	278071	279828	SPAC25B8.11	SPAC9.12c	SPAC25B8.11	atp12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.195634876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791991	2541574	2540533	278071	277061	SPAC25B8.11	SPBC29A10.16c	SPAC25B8.11	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.001938655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791992	2541574	2540930	278071	277446	SPAC25B8.11	SPBC354.10	SPAC25B8.11	def1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.566028376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791993	2542231	2542207	278704	278682	SPAC19G12.14	SPAC17H9.10c	its3	ddb1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812033627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791994	2542231	2542976	278704	279414	SPAC19G12.14	SPAC9E9.09c	its3	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323335184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791995	2542231	2542759	278704	279209	SPAC19G12.14	SPAC9G1.07	its3	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.12360515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791996	2542231	2540146	278704	276683	SPAC19G12.14	SPBC17A3.06	its3	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866896373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791997	2541496	2542207	277998	278682	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC17H9.10c	arp42	ddb1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.052453849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791998	2541496	2539050	277998	275623	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC11E10.08	arp42	rik1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.177167709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
791999	2541496	2542895	277998	279339	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC13G6.10c	arp42	asl1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.702412205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792000	2541496	2538721	277998	275305	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC1494.10	arp42	adn3	arp4	SPCC70.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.604654597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792001	2541496	2539841	277998	276389	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC17D1.05	arp42	SPBC17D1.05	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256886301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792002	2541496	2540060	277998	276598	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC106.01	arp42	mph1	arp4	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.837466019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792003	2541496	2540942	277998	277458	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC3H7.14	arp42	mug176	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812482683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792004	2541496	3361210	277998	280286	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC16E9.16c	arp42	lsd90	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.123209868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792005	2541496	2538961	277998	275535	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC285.14	arp42	trs130	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.970081356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792006	2541496	2539549	277998	276110	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC576.01c	arp42	xan1	arp4	SPCC576.01c|SPCPB1C11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.053424943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792007	2541496	2542598	277998	279052	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC6G10.08	arp42	idp1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.559825868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792008	2541496	2542518	277998	278976	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC1B3.16c	arp42	vht1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.253018182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792009	2541496	2541343	277998	277854	SPAC23D3.09	SPBPB2B2.19c	arp42	SPBPB2B2.19c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.298312214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792010	2541496	2541512	277998	278013	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC11E3.08c	arp42	nse6	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.123186758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792011	2541496	2543152	277998	279584	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC869.03c	arp42	SPAC869.03c	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930924383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792012	2541496	2539452	277998	276015	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC70.03c	arp42	SPCC70.03c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.813792049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792013	2541496	2542812	277998	279259	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC6F6.01	arp42	cch1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.848202464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792014	2541496	2541399	277998	277908	SPAC23D3.09	SPBPB10D8.01	arp42	SPBPB10D8.01	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445096189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792015	2541496	2543064	277998	279497	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC3G6.01	arp42	hrp3	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.515022909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792016	2541496	2542671	277998	279124	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC824.09c	arp42	SPAC824.09c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.613426424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792017	2541496	2540131	277998	276668	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC1778.05c	arp42	SPBC1778.05c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.015590639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792018	2541496	2542378	277998	278842	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC1805.04	arp42	nup132	arp4	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.178364834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792019	2541496	2540995	277998	277511	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC337.16	arp42	cho1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.209099697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792020	2541496	2543339	277998	279762	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC630.13c	arp42	tsc2	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.542787861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792021	2541496	2539930	277998	276474	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC1198.11c	arp42	reb1	arp4	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.082650899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792022	2541496	3361561	277998	280637	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC11E3.01c	arp42	swr1	arp4	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.529818611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792023	2541496	2541130	277998	277645	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC776.11	arp42	rpl2801	arp4	rpl28-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.454654556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792024	2541496	2540296	277998	276827	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC2D10.05	arp42	exg3	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.993282806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792025	2541496	2541117	277998	277632	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC646.13	arp42	sds23	arp4	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.436073517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792026	2541496	2540161	277998	276696	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC13E7.03c	arp42	SPBC13E7.03c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.051647059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792027	2541496	2541345	277998	277856	SPAC23D3.09	SPBP35G2.07	arp42	ilv1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.128195812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792028	2541496	2541633	277998	278129	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC664.01c	arp42	swi6	arp4	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.497275453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792029	2541496	2541374	277998	277885	SPAC23D3.09	SPBPB10D8.06c	arp42	SPBPB10D8.06c	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980721203	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792030	2541496	2542492	277998	278951	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC1B9.02c	arp42	sck1	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.381454528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792031	2541496	2543434	277998	279854	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC8F11.02c	arp42	dph3	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.551679368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792032	2541496	2540686	277998	277211	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC21D10.10	arp42	bdc1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.734133664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792033	2541496	2542103	277998	278579	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC31G5.11	arp42	pac2	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.445681023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792034	2541496	2540491	277998	277019	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC28E12.04	arp42	SPBC28E12.04	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258738833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792035	2541496	2540664	277998	277189	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC215.02	arp42	bob1	arp4	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.081093279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792036	2541496	2543320	277998	279744	SPAC23D3.09	SPAPJ695.01c	arp42	SPAPJ695.01c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.547935337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792037	2541496	2539332	277998	275898	SPAC23D3.09	SPCPB1C11.01	arp42	amt1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.690846298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792038	2541496	3361375	277998	280451	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC212.06c	arp42	SPAC212.06c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.945234939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792039	2541496	2539226	277998	275796	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC16C4.20c	arp42	SPCC16C4.20c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.783279888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792040	2541496	2539420	277998	275985	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC970.07c	arp42	raf2	arp4	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.731999384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792041	2541496	2543661	277998	280075	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC644.08	arp42	SPAC644.08	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.851030762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792042	2541496	2542468	277998	278929	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC1D4.09c	arp42	rtf2	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380463094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792043	2541496	2541951	277998	278438	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC222.05c	arp42	mss1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.625584692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792044	2541496	2542050	277998	278529	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC212.02	arp42	SPAC212.02	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.84376308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792045	2541496	2541013	277998	277528	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC3H7.13	arp42	far10	arp4	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633395427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792046	2541496	2540979	277998	277495	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC3H7.10	arp42	elp6	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321057097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792047	2541496	2538847	277998	275428	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC594.06c	arp42	SPCC594.06c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.143227009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792048	2541496	2539510	277998	276072	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC4G3.04c	arp42	coq5	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.28119887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792049	2541496	2542816	277998	279263	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC4G8.11c	arp42	atp10	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.211841456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792050	2541496	2541058	277998	277573	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC3H7.09	arp42	erf2	arp4	mug142	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712548497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792051	2541496	2539913	277998	276457	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC11G11.03	arp42	mrt4	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.287171575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792052	2541496	2541682	277998	278178	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC15F9.02	arp42	seh1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.539049041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792053	2541496	2539564	277998	276125	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC550.12	arp42	arp6	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.345598505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792054	2541496	2540029	277998	276573	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC16A3.01	arp42	spn3	arp4	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.556422504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792055	2541496	2543681	277998	280095	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC9.02c	arp42	SPAC9.02c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.440690894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792056	2541496	2542696	277998	279149	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC29B12.03	arp42	spd1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.822497582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792057	2541496	2542299	277998	278766	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC18B11.10	arp42	tup11	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.614364318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792058	2541496	2542689	277998	279142	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC29B12.04	arp42	snz1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.8078601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792059	2541496	2542724	277998	279175	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC767.01c	arp42	vps1	arp4	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.158502573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792060	2541496	2542569	277998	279025	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC186.08c	arp42	SPAC186.08c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.753265049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792061	2541496	2543137	277998	279569	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC869.04	arp42	SPAC869.04	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.685319321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792062	2541496	2539434	277998	275997	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC757.09c	arp42	rnc1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.970490532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792063	2541496	2540220	277998	276753	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC337.03	arp42	rhn1	arp4	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.525169412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792064	2541496	2542627	277998	279081	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC750.04c	arp42	SPAC750.04c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.129899722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792065	2541496	2539797	277998	276347	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC16G5.14c	arp42	rps3	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331201453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792066	2541496	2539575	277998	276135	SPAC23D3.09	SPCP20C8.02c	arp42	SPCP20C8.02c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45046685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792067	2541496	2540929	277998	277445	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC354.03	arp42	swd3	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.892448517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792068	2541496	2541119	277998	277634	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC651.11c	arp42	apm3	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.630914354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792069	2541496	2542182	277998	278657	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC19B12.08	arp42	atg4	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638595681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792070	2541496	2541323	277998	277835	SPAC23D3.09	SPBP35G2.14	arp42	SPBP35G2.14	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.70582694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792071	2541496	2542318	277998	278784	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC16C9.05	arp42	cph1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.972417995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792072	2541496	2542277	277998	278746	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC17A5.02c	arp42	dbr1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.644616142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792073	2541496	2543685	277998	280099	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC3C7.03c	arp42	rad55	arp4	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.803734081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792074	2541496	2540851	277998	277368	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC4F6.04	arp42	rpl2502	arp4	rpl23a-2|rpl25b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092429768	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792075	2541496	2539822	277998	276372	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC16G5.02c	arp42	SPBC16G5.02c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377963091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792076	2541496	2540663	277998	277188	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC56F2.06	arp42	mug147	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.670937229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792077	2541496	2540127	277998	276664	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC106.20	arp42	exo70	arp4	SPBC582.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.985875839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792078	2541496	2543108	277998	279540	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC3A12.13c	arp42	SPAC3A12.13c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.619496707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792079	2541496	2539244	277998	275814	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC1672.06c	arp42	asp1	arp4	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.328501943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792080	2541496	2540059	277998	276597	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC1198.01	arp42	fmd2	arp4	SPBC1198.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383774096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792081	2541496	2543551	277998	279968	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC4G8.06c	arp42	trm12	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.26393668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792082	2541496	2541522	277998	278023	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC23E2.01	arp42	fep1	arp4	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576179929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792083	2541496	2541004	277998	277519	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC3F6.01c	arp42	SPBC3F6.01c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.62734354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792084	2541496	2543584	277998	279999	SPAC23D3.09	SPAPB1E7.11c	arp42	SPAPB1E7.11c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.3667897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792085	2541496	2543426	277998	279846	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC631.02	arp42	bdf2	arp4	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.805003109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792086	2541496	2541905	277998	278395	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC6G9.01c	arp42	SPAC6G9.01c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324317348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792087	2541496	2541416	277998	277923	SPAC23D3.09	SPBCPT2R1.01c	arp42	SPBCPT2R1.01c	arp4	SPBPB2B2.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639109292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792088	2541496	2539352	277998	275918	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC188.07	arp42	ccq1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.400228328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792089	2541496	2543078	277998	279511	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC31A2.15c	arp42	dcc1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.69866039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792090	2541496	2540415	277998	276943	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC30B4.06c	arp42	SPBC30B4.06c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.613572544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792091	2541496	2541663	277998	278159	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC22G7.08	arp42	ppk8	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.012670925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792092	2541496	2539381	277998	275947	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC1739.10	arp42	mug33	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.63172941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792093	2541496	2538906	277998	275483	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC1259.03	arp42	rpa12	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.507440942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792094	2541496	2542253	277998	278723	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC17H9.04c	arp42	SPAC17H9.04c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.314360695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792095	2541496	2542981	277998	279419	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC824.02	arp42	bst1	arp4	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.296158829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792096	2541496	2540825	277998	277343	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC428.08c	arp42	clr4	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.789159265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792097	2541496	3361543	277998	280619	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC9.13c	arp42	cwf16	arp4	SPAPJ735.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.491568306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792098	2541496	2541926	277998	278414	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC222.14c	arp42	SPAC222.14c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.960803087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792099	2541496	2541812	277998	278303	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC23G3.12c	arp42	SPAC23G3.12c	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149275106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792100	2541496	2539448	277998	276011	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC825.04c	arp42	naa40	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321210506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792101	2541496	2541021	277998	277536	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC3B8.10c	arp42	nem1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.43583054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792102	2541496	2540964	277998	277480	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC365.16	arp42	SPBC365.16	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.417839501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792103	2541496	2539310	277998	275877	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC285.17	arp42	spp27	arp4	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.879696923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792104	2541496	2543651	277998	280065	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC644.11c	arp42	pkp1	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.832429304	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792105	2541496	2542239	277998	278711	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC18G6.02c	arp42	chp1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708445557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792106	2541496	2539023	277998	275596	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC594.05c	arp42	spf1	arp4	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.798043603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792107	2541496	2539467	277998	276030	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC417.07c	arp42	mto1	arp4	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714635921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792108	2541496	2543349	277998	279771	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC977.02	arp42	SPAC977.02	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.198040181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792109	2541496	2543020	277998	279456	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC10F6.13c	arp42	SPAC10F6.13c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.197700976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792110	2541496	2542596	277998	279050	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC1B3.17	arp42	clr2	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.061203118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792111	2541496	2540797	277998	277316	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC18H10.11c	arp42	ppr2	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442870674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792112	2541496	2542964	277998	279404	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC12G12.07c	arp42	SPAC12G12.07c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.692178776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792113	2541496	2538715	277998	275299	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC1223.05c	arp42	rpl3702	arp4	rpl37|rpl37-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983996845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792114	2541496	2540892	277998	277408	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC530.01	arp42	gyp1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.132325929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792115	2541496	2541776	277998	278270	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC23H3.05c	arp42	swd1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.149130583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792116	2541496	2543144	277998	279576	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC3F10.05c	arp42	mug113	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.297634045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792117	2541496	2543445	277998	279865	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC4F10.13c	arp42	mpd2	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.02261812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792118	2541496	2542249	277998	278719	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC30D11.14c	arp42	SPAC30D11.14c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.556434566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792119	2541496	2538770	277998	275353	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC1753.02c	arp42	git3	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582108973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792120	2541496	2542755	277998	279205	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC1687.10	arp42	mcp1	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874168598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792121	2541496	2540338	277998	276867	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC2G2.13c	arp42	dcd1	arp4	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.67961193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792122	2541496	2538706	277998	275290	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC338.08	arp42	ctp1	arp4	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.815815958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792123	2541496	2542507	277998	278965	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC18G6.13	arp42	SPAC18G6.13	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507979117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792124	2541496	2540352	277998	276881	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC215.03c	arp42	csn1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.691237365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792125	2541496	2539733	277998	276285	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC16E9.12c	arp42	pab2	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.089649673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792126	2541496	2540396	277998	276924	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC31F10.12	arp42	tma20	arp4	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.469688692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792127	2541496	2540673	277998	277198	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC1D7.03	arp42	mug80	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.723948148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792128	2541496	2542543	277998	279000	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC30D11.11	arp42	SPAC30D11.11	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195753127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792129	2541496	2540886	277998	277403	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC4F6.10	arp42	vps901	arp4	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.569373083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792130	2541496	2541911	277998	278401	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC212.04c	arp42	SPAC212.04c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.132329281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792131	2541496	2541928	277998	278416	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC227.03c	arp42	SPAC227.03c	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.515081105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792132	2541496	2542168	277998	278643	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC17A5.16	arp42	ftp105	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.638768824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792133	2541496	2542235	277998	278707	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC18G6.05c	arp42	SPAC18G6.05c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326251173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792134	2541496	2542428	277998	278890	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC1805.12c	arp42	uep1	arp4	ubi2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986456324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792135	2541496	2539999	277998	276543	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC1734.15	arp42	rsc4	arp4	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.792245385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792136	2541496	2539603	277998	276161	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC1289.06c	arp42	ppr8	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.971856424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792137	2541496	2541929	277998	278417	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC23C4.12	arp42	hhp2	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195817161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792138	2541496	2538871	277998	275450	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC1259.14c	arp42	meu27	arp4	B8647-6	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439838179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792139	2541496	2540452	277998	276980	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC2A9.11c	arp42	iss9	arp4	SPBC2A9.11c|SPBC2D10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.336207942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792140	2541496	2543643	277998	280057	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC3G9.07c	arp42	hos2	arp4	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.459048923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792141	2541496	2541899	277998	278389	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC22E12.11c	arp42	set3	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.170242914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792142	2541496	2540086	277998	276624	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC16H5.12c	arp42	SPBC16H5.12c	arp4	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.170756696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792143	2541496	2541710	277998	278205	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC343.11c	arp42	msc1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.247192922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792144	2541496	2543396	277998	279818	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC4D7.11	arp42	dsc4	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.581000918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792145	2541496	2540326	277998	276856	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC2G5.06c	arp42	hmt2	arp4	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.27911902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792146	2541496	2538769	277998	275352	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC126.04c	arp42	sgf73	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.215430476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792147	2541496	2539667	277998	276222	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC13G1.08c	arp42	ash2	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.24018977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792148	2541496	2542126	277998	278602	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC1B3.05	arp42	not3	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.749539887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792149	2541496	2542032	277998	278514	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC23C11.04c	arp42	pnk1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.048710399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792150	2541496	2542528	277998	278986	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC1B3.08	arp42	SPAC1B3.08	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.367879287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792151	2541496	2540997	277998	277513	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC3H7.06c	arp42	pof9	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.031138023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792152	2541496	2538873	277998	275452	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC306.11	arp42	SPCC306.11	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.063695516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792153	2541496	2542710	277998	279163	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC750.08c	arp42	SPAC750.08c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.962088357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792154	2541496	2543244	277998	279672	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC6B12.06c	arp42	rrg9	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.828054517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792155	2541496	2540256	277998	276787	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC32F12.12c	arp42	SPBC32F12.12c	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.897421496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792156	2541496	2543367	277998	279789	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC3H1.10	arp42	pcs2	arp4	SPAC3H1.10|pcs	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932464139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792157	2541496	2540751	277998	277273	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC20F10.10	arp42	psl1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.130042296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792158	2541496	2540290	277998	276821	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC29A3.02c	arp42	his7	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317937812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792159	2541496	2539217	277998	275787	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC1223.03c	arp42	gut2	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.1964824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792160	2541496	2539974	277998	276518	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC32H8.07	arp42	git5	arp4	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.836982691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792161	2541496	2540836	277998	277354	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC18H10.19	arp42	vps38	arp4	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.486596008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792162	2541496	2540077	277998	276615	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC17D11.04c	arp42	nto1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.521501254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792163	2541496	2540232	277998	276764	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC336.10c	arp42	tif512	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.745335565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792164	2541496	2542431	277998	278893	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC1A6.01c	arp42	SPAC1A6.01c	arp4	SPAC23C4.20c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.124784184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792165	2541496	2543378	277998	279800	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC3H8.07c	arp42	pac10	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.922035849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792166	2541496	2542254	277998	278724	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC30D11.04c	arp42	nup124	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.305051885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792167	2541496	2543301	277998	279726	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC977.17	arp42	SPAC977.17	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.881376018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792168	2541496	2542549	277998	279006	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC19A8.11c	arp42	SPAC19A8.11c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.847645413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792169	2541496	2539408	277998	275973	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC576.12c	arp42	mhf2	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.11756826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792170	2541496	2539481	277998	276044	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC622.16c	arp42	epe1	arp4	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.429429827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792171	2541496	2538767	277998	275350	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC1672.12c	arp42	get4	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.55884641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792172	2541496	5802861	277998	857999	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC1D4.01	arp42	tls1	arp4	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.681507072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792173	2541496	2539953	277998	276497	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC1709.11c	arp42	png2	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.766514811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792174	2541496	2542056	277998	278535	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC6G9.14	arp42	SPAC6G9.14	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.26324765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792175	2541496	2540387	277998	276915	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC24C6.04	arp42	SPBC24C6.04	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.710580872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792176	2541496	2540990	277998	277506	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC36B7.06c	arp42	mug20	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.127435226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792177	2541496	2543443	277998	279863	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC3H1.12c	arp42	snt2	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.72013458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792178	2541496	2541389	277998	277900	SPAC23D3.09	SPBPB2B2.09c	arp42	SPBPB2B2.09c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.111396302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792179	2541496	2542008	277998	278491	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC2G11.07c	arp42	ptc3	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635767335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792180	2541496	2538780	277998	275361	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC1840.07c	arp42	SPCC1840.07c	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.513986908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792181	2541496	2541708	277998	278203	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC31A2.02	arp42	trm112	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.198367205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792182	2541496	2541464	277998	277966	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC222.08c	arp42	SPAC222.08c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.853397903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792183	2541496	2540342	277998	276871	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC2G2.01c	arp42	liz1	arp4	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.406217497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792184	2541496	2539043	277998	275616	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC1235.08c	arp42	pdh1	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818255357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792185	2541496	2540967	277998	277483	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC36B7.08c	arp42	SPBC36B7.08c	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462843308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792186	2541496	2541410	277998	277918	SPAC23D3.09	SPBPB2B2.17c	arp42	SPBPB2B2.17c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.258878621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792187	2541496	2539847	277998	276395	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC530.14c	arp42	dsk1	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.661812575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792188	2541496	2543517	277998	279935	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC3G9.05	arp42	spa2	arp4	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.698710648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792189	2541496	2541395	277998	277904	SPAC23D3.09	SPBP8B7.25	arp42	cyp4	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154665907	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792190	2541496	2541296	277998	277808	SPAC23D3.09	SPBP8B7.06	arp42	rpp201	arp4	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.206050598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792191	2541496	2541054	277998	277569	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC3B8.08	arp42	SPBC3B8.08	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874294164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792192	2541496	2541186	277998	277700	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC725.01	arp42	SPBC725.01	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.119330379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792193	2541496	2540844	277998	277361	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC1921.04c	arp42	SPBC1921.04c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.991255538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792194	2541496	2540533	277998	277061	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC29A10.16c	arp42	SPBC29A10.16c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.319168282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792195	2541496	2541927	277998	278415	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC222.12c	arp42	atp2	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.890003265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792196	2541496	2538884	277998	275462	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC1393.08	arp42	SPCC1393.08	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.136471884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792197	2541496	2539421	277998	275986	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC794.11c	arp42	ent3	arp4	SPCC794.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.131052461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792198	2541496	2541746	277998	278240	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC20G4.04c	arp42	hus1	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.229128721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792199	2541496	2539812	277998	276362	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC1347.02	arp42	fkbp39	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.114426325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792200	2541496	2540193	277998	276726	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC1289.10c	arp42	adn2	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.353789038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792201	2541496	2541337	277998	277848	SPAC23D3.09	SPBP35G2.13c	arp42	swc2	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.740984566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792202	2541496	2541378	277998	277889	SPAC23D3.09	SPBP8B7.21	arp42	ubp3	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.316606075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792203	2541496	2542329	277998	278795	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC9G1.10c	arp42	SPAC9G1.10c	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.504256821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792204	2541496	2539527	277998	276089	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC338.16	arp42	pof3	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.447316288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792205	2541496	2542973	277998	279412	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC10F6.04	arp42	SPAC10F6.04	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866578924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792206	2541496	2541742	277998	278236	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC22H10.09	arp42	SPAC22H10.09	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.813464807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792207	2541496	2542453	277998	278914	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC186.01	arp42	pfl9	arp4	SPAC186.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873184207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792208	2541496	2538848	277998	275429	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC613.12c	arp42	raf1	arp4	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.42152725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792209	2541496	2541896	277998	278386	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC23H4.16c	arp42	SPAC23H4.16c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.778044287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792210	2541496	2540643	277998	277168	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC19G7.06	arp42	mbx1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.938543848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792211	2541496	2542673	277998	279126	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC26A3.11	arp42	SPAC26A3.11	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044710543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792212	2541496	2539908	277998	276454	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC13E7.06	arp42	msd1	arp4	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.348865483	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792213	2541496	2539763	277998	276314	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC1861.05	arp42	SPBC1861.05	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.004082445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792214	2541496	2540001	277998	276545	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC1289.13c	arp42	gmh6	arp4	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.079159087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792215	2541496	2542170	277998	278645	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC17G8.13c	arp42	mst2	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.048552898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792216	2541496	2539706	277998	276259	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC16G5.13	arp42	ptf2	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381472896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792217	2541496	2542806	277998	279254	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC1610.01	arp42	saf5	arp4	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.880821401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792218	2541496	2543113	277998	279545	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC3F10.07c	arp42	erf4	arp4	mug91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709454626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792219	2541496	2538907	277998	275484	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC24B10.19c	arp42	nts1	arp4	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094114159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792220	2541496	3361389	277998	280465	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC977.13c	arp42	SPAC977.13c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.341551583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792221	2541496	2540226	277998	276758	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC32H8.08c	arp42	omh5	arp4	pi016|SPACTOKYO_453.20	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041844246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792222	2541496	2538762	277998	275345	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC306.04c	arp42	set1	arp4	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.538685374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792223	2541496	2543628	277998	280042	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC3H8.10	arp42	spo20	arp4	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.676075244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792224	2541496	2539101	277998	275673	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC736.04c	arp42	gma12	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.629926145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792225	2541496	2539555	277998	276116	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC4B3.08	arp42	lsg1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.694594277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792226	2541496	2542327	277998	278793	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC16C9.06c	arp42	upf1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.852927821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792227	2541496	2541175	277998	277689	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC839.13c	arp42	rpl1601	arp4	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.927708307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792228	2541496	2539137	277998	275709	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC1682.08c	arp42	mcp2	arp4	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773479864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792229	2541496	2543670	277998	280084	SPAC23D3.09	SPAPB1E7.06c	arp42	eme1	arp4	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506944343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792230	2541496	2541909	277998	278399	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC227.01c	arp42	erd1	arp4	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.684166147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792231	2541496	2540498	277998	277026	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC27.02c	arp42	ask1	arp4	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.847876792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792232	2541496	2542881	277998	279326	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC13F5.03c	arp42	gld1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.532690244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792233	2541496	2542915	277998	279357	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC6C3.06c	arp42	SPAC6C3.06c	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81353174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792234	2541496	2543267	277998	279695	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC1002.12c	arp42	SPAC1002.12c	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.487078285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792235	2541496	2539925	277998	276469	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC16H5.13	arp42	SPBC16H5.13	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380232609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792236	2541496	2539600	277998	276158	SPAC23D3.09	SPCP1E11.03	arp42	mug170	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.631099159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792237	2541496	2543304	277998	279728	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC6B12.12	arp42	tom70	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.963065851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792238	2541496	2538966	277998	275540	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC18.10	arp42	SPCC18.10	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.939661192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792239	2541496	2540702	277998	277226	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC19F8.03c	arp42	yap18	arp4	SPBC19F8.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808466724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792240	2541496	2540998	277998	277514	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC3D6.05	arp42	ptp4	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.492372463	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792241	2541496	2539246	277998	275816	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC18.13	arp42	SPCC18.13	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994730438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792242	2541496	2543136	277998	279568	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC1348.07	arp42	SPBC1348.07	arp4	SPAC1348.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.512100714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792243	2541496	2538962	277998	275536	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC965.13	arp42	SPCC965.13	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510847508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792244	2541496	2541100	277998	277615	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC651.04	arp42	SPBC651.04	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.371209087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792245	2541496	2541103	277998	277618	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC651.06	arp42	mug166	arp4	csa1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637471874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792246	2541496	2541432	277998	277937	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC1F5.05c	arp42	mso1	arp4	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.841230435	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792247	2541496	2543066	277998	279499	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC343.12	arp42	rds1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.910868409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792248	2541496	2540115	277998	276652	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC1778.02	arp42	rap1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.344609255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792249	2541496	2541531	277998	278031	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC25A8.01c	arp42	fft3	arp4	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.454717729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792250	2541496	2540346	277998	276875	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC2F12.03c	arp42	ebs1	arp4	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.99260966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792251	2541496	2539013	277998	275586	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC364.03	arp42	rpl1702	arp4	rpl17|rpl17-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.691661418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792252	2541496	2542025	277998	278507	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC23C11.01	arp42	SPAC23C11.01	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508048656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792253	2541496	2540699	277998	277223	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC800.08	arp42	gcd10	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.179811698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792254	2541496	2540829	277998	277347	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC800.09	arp42	sum2	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.760549305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792255	2541496	2540164	277998	276699	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC1683.03c	arp42	SPBC1683.03c	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.029738016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792256	2541496	2539136	277998	275708	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC1919.05	arp42	SPCC1919.05	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.902620092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792257	2541496	2538692	277998	275277	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC162.04c	arp42	wtf13	arp4	wtf12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.448692303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792258	2541496	2542326	277998	278792	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC16C9.07	arp42	pom2	arp4	SPAC2G11.01|mug189|ppk5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.988042964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792259	2541496	2541149	277998	277664	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC651.03c	arp42	gyp10	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377721369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792260	2541496	2539729	277998	276281	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC11B10.07c	arp42	ivn1	arp4	pi004|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.844515565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792261	2541496	2540211	277998	276744	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC947.15c	arp42	nde1	arp4	SPBC947.15c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.742970311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792262	2541496	2542222	277998	278695	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC31G5.18c	arp42	sde2	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.476365898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792263	2541496	2543427	277998	279847	SPAC23D3.09	SPAPB1A10.15	arp42	arv1	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.410374234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792264	2541496	2539668	277998	276223	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC11B10.10c	arp42	pht1	arp4	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.947965359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792265	2541496	2541404	277998	277913	SPAC23D3.09	SPBPB2B2.18	arp42	SPBPB2B2.18	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.726167364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792266	2541496	2540516	277998	277044	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC21C3.01c	arp42	vps13a	arp4	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.491797084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792267	2541496	2542635	277998	279089	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC24H6.09	arp42	gef1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.343844749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792268	2541496	2539207	277998	275777	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC285.09c	arp42	cgs2	arp4	pde1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.066860484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792269	2541496	2543633	277998	280047	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC3H8.05c	arp42	mms1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.112006487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792270	2541496	2540432	277998	276960	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC25H2.05	arp42	egd2	arp4	nac1|ucp15	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812935697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792271	2541496	2539170	277998	275741	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC306.02c	arp42	SPCC306.02c	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.401655413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792272	2541496	2539545	277998	276106	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC4B3.12	arp42	set9	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.797897288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792273	2541496	2540563	277998	277090	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC25H2.09	arp42	SPBC25H2.09	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323222079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792274	2541496	2539726	277998	276278	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC13E7.08c	arp42	leo1	arp4	SPBC13E7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.221594894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792275	2541496	3361511	277998	280587	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC23C4.08	arp42	rho3	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.990515648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792276	2541496	2542607	277998	279061	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC18B11.02c	arp42	SPAC18B11.02c	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818618781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792277	2541496	2543380	277998	279802	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC4G9.16c	arp42	rpl901	arp4	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32479531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792278	2541496	2540146	277998	276683	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC17A3.06	arp42	SPBC17A3.06	arp4	pi040	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.348785132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792279	2541496	2538840	277998	275421	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC736.07c	arp42	SPCC736.07c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.847552542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792280	2541496	2541941	277998	278428	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC20H4.03c	arp42	tfs1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.178552345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792281	2541496	2543337	277998	279760	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC959.08	arp42	rpl2102	arp4	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702663318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792282	2541496	2542021	277998	278504	SPAC23D3.09	SPAP14E8.02	arp42	tos4	arp4	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.622709148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792283	2541496	2539253	277998	275823	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC1827.03c	arp42	SPCC1827.03c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702134437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792284	2541496	3361360	277998	280436	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC1652.01	arp42	SPBC1652.01	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.319591486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792285	2541496	2538861	277998	275441	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC1620.11	arp42	nup97	arp4	mug87	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.540426616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792286	2541496	2541238	277998	277752	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC8E4.05c	arp42	SPBC8E4.05c	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.542035178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792287	2541496	2542716	277998	279169	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC25H1.07	arp42	emc1	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819070742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792288	2541496	2541806	277998	278297	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC4G8.13c	arp42	prz1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.137203001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792289	2541496	2541774	277998	278268	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC22E12.05c	arp42	rer1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442190317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792290	2541496	2543387	277998	279809	SPAC23D3.09	SPAPB1E7.02c	arp42	mcl1	arp4	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.070531419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792291	2541496	2543327	277998	279750	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC1D4.06c	arp42	csk1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.632563697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792292	2541496	2542886	277998	279331	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC1486.01	arp42	SPAC1486.01	arp4	sod2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.708896928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792293	2541496	2543471	277998	279891	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC513.07	arp42	SPAC513.07	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.308756983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792294	2541496	2540558	277998	277085	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC2D10.17	arp42	clr1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.590705087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792295	2541496	2542424	277998	278886	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC1805.14	arp42	SPAC1805.14	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.973045782	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792296	2541496	2541867	277998	278357	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC22E12.14c	arp42	sck2	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.896055013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792297	2541496	2539588	277998	276146	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC962.04	arp42	rps1201	arp4	rps12|rps12-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511278498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792298	2541496	2539085	277998	275657	SPAC23D3.09	SPCC285.15c	arp42	rps2802	arp4	rps28|rps28-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148718179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792299	2541496	2543372	277998	279794	SPAC23D3.09	SPAPB1A10.09	arp42	ase1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.577991604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792300	2541496	2543090	277998	279523	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC1348.01	arp42	SPBC1348.01	arp4	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.627151195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792301	2541496	2543448	277998	279868	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC3H5.07	arp42	rpl702	arp4	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.130827199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792302	2541496	2541272	277998	277786	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC947.03c	arp42	naa38	arp4	mak31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.438887753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792303	2541496	2542943	277998	279384	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC1348.03	arp42	SPBC1348.03	arp4	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.386827291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792304	2541496	2539450	277998	276013	SPAC23D3.09	SPCP31B10.04	arp42	SPCP31B10.04	arp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986716148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792305	2541496	2541576	277998	278073	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC1348.02	arp42	SPBC1348.02	arp4	SPAC1348.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.395870772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792306	2541496	2543646	277998	280060	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC821.07c	arp42	moc3	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702354911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792307	2541496	2542617	277998	279071	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC13A11.01c	arp42	rga8	arp4	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.056207792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792308	2541496	2540320	277998	276850	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC3D6.04c	arp42	mad1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.700343426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792309	2541496	2541875	277998	278365	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC22F3.06c	arp42	lon1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.011482169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792310	2541496	2540787	277998	277306	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC1921.07c	arp42	sgf29	arp4	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.204194825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792311	2541496	2540734	277998	277257	SPAC23D3.09	SPBC19G7.09	arp42	ulp1	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.991994115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792312	2541496	2542908	277998	279352	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC13G7.03	arp42	upf3	arp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.339367617	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792313	2541496	2542609	277998	279063	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC31G5.04	arp42	lys12	arp4	SPAC31G5.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.406048986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792314	2542522	2543529	278980	279947	SPAC19A8.03	SPAC4C5.02c	ymr1	ryh1	SPAC19A8.03	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509472872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792315	2542522	2540235	278980	276767	SPAC19A8.03	SPBC336.13c	ymr1	SPBC336.13c	SPAC19A8.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.436304064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792316	2542522	2541119	278980	277634	SPAC19A8.03	SPBC651.11c	ymr1	apm3	SPAC19A8.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.693818365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792317	2542522	2543029	278980	279465	SPAC19A8.03	SPAC11G7.01	ymr1	SPAC11G7.01	SPAC19A8.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.906941785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792318	2542522	2541323	278980	277835	SPAC19A8.03	SPBP35G2.14	ymr1	SPBP35G2.14	SPAC19A8.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.497860564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792319	2542522	2542135	278980	278611	SPAC19A8.03	SPAC13A11.04c	ymr1	ubp8	SPAC19A8.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.405483184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792320	2542522	2542969	278980	279409	SPAC19A8.03	SPAC4G8.10	ymr1	gos1	SPAC19A8.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.049599529	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792321	2542522	2541021	278980	277536	SPAC19A8.03	SPBC3B8.10c	ymr1	nem1	SPAC19A8.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773325893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792322	2542522	2541250	278980	277764	SPAC19A8.03	SPBC8D2.17	ymr1	gmh4	SPAC19A8.03	SPBC8D2.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.836313688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792323	2542522	2542513	278980	278971	SPAC19A8.03	SPAC1952.05	ymr1	gcn5	SPAC19A8.03	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.530730031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792324	2542522	2542660	278980	279113	SPAC19A8.03	SPAC328.03	ymr1	tps1	SPAC19A8.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.477058657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792325	2542522	2540886	278980	277403	SPAC19A8.03	SPBC4F6.10	ymr1	vps901	SPAC19A8.03	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.915929626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792326	2542522	2542857	278980	279303	SPAC19A8.03	SPAC144.06	ymr1	apl5	SPAC19A8.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.259161225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792327	2542522	2542691	278980	279144	SPAC19A8.03	SPAC26H5.07c	ymr1	SPAC26H5.07c	SPAC19A8.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.625296842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792328	2542522	2543396	278980	279818	SPAC19A8.03	SPAC4D7.11	ymr1	dsc4	SPAC19A8.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779297428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792329	2542522	2541900	278980	278390	SPAC19A8.03	SPAC23H4.17c	ymr1	srb10	SPAC19A8.03	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.642530084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792330	2542522	2540019	278980	276563	SPAC19A8.03	SPBC1685.01	ymr1	pmp1	SPAC19A8.03	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.898269091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792331	2542522	2539519	278980	276081	SPAC19A8.03	SPCC364.05	ymr1	vps3	SPAC19A8.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.437389141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792332	2542522	2538762	278980	275345	SPAC19A8.03	SPCC306.04c	ymr1	set1	SPAC19A8.03	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.785653638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792333	2542522	2540061	278980	276599	SPAC19A8.03	SPBC119.12	ymr1	rud3	SPAC19A8.03	SPBC119.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189056058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792334	2542522	2540800	278980	277319	SPAC19A8.03	SPBC409.20c	ymr1	psh3	SPAC19A8.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.49770551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792335	2542522	2543662	278980	280076	SPAC19A8.03	SPAC9.07c	ymr1	SPAC9.07c	SPAC19A8.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.396326763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792336	2542522	2538916	278980	275493	SPAC19A8.03	SPCC16C4.17	ymr1	mug123	SPAC19A8.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.455007918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792337	2542522	2540270	278980	276801	SPAC19A8.03	SPBC2G2.02	ymr1	syj1	SPAC19A8.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.964984209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792338	2542522	2541709	278980	278204	SPAC19A8.03	SPAC3C7.02c	ymr1	pil2	SPAC19A8.03	SPAC3C7.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382990226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792339	2542522	2541806	278980	278297	SPAC19A8.03	SPAC4G8.13c	ymr1	prz1	SPAC19A8.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.732980081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792340	2542522	2543327	278980	279750	SPAC19A8.03	SPAC1D4.06c	ymr1	csk1	SPAC19A8.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445604292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792341	2542522	2543472	278980	279892	SPAC19A8.03	SPAC959.04c	ymr1	omh6	SPAC19A8.03	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980861627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792342	2542522	2542617	278980	279071	SPAC19A8.03	SPAC13A11.01c	ymr1	rga8	SPAC19A8.03	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.891811019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792343	2542522	2542571	278980	279027	SPAC19A8.03	SPAC589.02c	ymr1	med13	SPAC19A8.03	spTrap240|srb9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699916655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792344	2539248	2539774	275818	276325	SPCC1739.03	SPBC17A3.10	hrr1	pas4	-	pi036	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.334481388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792345	2539248	2542207	275818	278682	SPCC1739.03	SPAC17H9.10c	hrr1	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.509291875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792346	2539248	2539050	275818	275623	SPCC1739.03	SPCC11E10.08	hrr1	rik1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.17770759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792347	2539248	2540060	275818	276598	SPCC1739.03	SPBC106.01	hrr1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.503348804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792348	2539248	2540942	275818	277458	SPCC1739.03	SPBC3H7.14	hrr1	mug176	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.618341568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792349	2539248	2541656	275818	278152	SPCC1739.03	SPAC25H1.06	hrr1	pcf3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.635693924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792350	2539248	2540026	275818	276570	SPCC1739.03	SPBC16D10.08c	hrr1	hsp104	-	SPBC16D10.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.842913981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792351	2539248	2542812	275818	279259	SPCC1739.03	SPAC6F6.01	hrr1	cch1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045593954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792352	2539248	2539165	275818	275736	SPCC1739.03	SPCC1281.04	hrr1	SPCC1281.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035734623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792353	2539248	2541650	275818	278146	SPCC1739.03	SPAC14C4.12c	hrr1	laf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.375187258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792354	2539248	2542378	275818	278842	SPCC1739.03	SPAC1805.04	hrr1	nup132	-	Nup133b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924075374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792355	2539248	2540528	275818	277056	SPCC1739.03	SPBC18H10.04c	hrr1	sce3	-	tif48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.506436994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792356	2539248	2541438	275818	277943	SPCC1739.03	SPAC23G3.10c	hrr1	ssr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.131411959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792357	2539248	2543559	275818	279975	SPCC1739.03	SPAC664.04c	hrr1	rps1602	-	rps16|rps16-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.621097619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792358	2539248	2541856	275818	278347	SPCC1739.03	SPAC23H3.08c	hrr1	bub3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714902344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792359	2539248	2539350	275818	275916	SPCC1739.03	SPCC24B10.17	hrr1	emp24	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.558066781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792360	2539248	2539944	275818	276488	SPCC1739.03	SPBC1198.06c	hrr1	SPBC1198.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.983391206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792361	2539248	2542917	275818	279358	SPCC1739.03	SPAC9E9.11	hrr1	plr1	-	plr	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984900943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792362	2539248	2543164	275818	279595	SPCC1739.03	SPAC3G6.06c	hrr1	rad2	-	fen1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864305946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792363	2539248	2542103	275818	278579	SPCC1739.03	SPAC31G5.11	hrr1	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.750957764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792364	2539248	2543270	275818	279698	SPCC1739.03	SPAC1002.02	hrr1	pom34	-	mug31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638878368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792365	2539248	2541361	275818	277872	SPCC1739.03	SPBP8B7.10c	hrr1	utp16	-	SPBP8B7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.943862722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792366	2539248	3361375	275818	280451	SPCC1739.03	SPAC212.06c	hrr1	SPAC212.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.617508761	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792367	2539248	2539226	275818	275796	SPCC1739.03	SPCC16C4.20c	hrr1	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702797874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792368	2539248	2540975	275818	277491	SPCC1739.03	SPBC354.12	hrr1	gpd3	-	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.678924679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792369	2539248	2539420	275818	275985	SPCC1739.03	SPCC970.07c	hrr1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.074221862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792370	2539248	2542669	275818	279122	SPCC1739.03	SPAC29B12.08	hrr1	clr5	-	SPAC29B12.08	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.329589816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792371	2539248	2542299	275818	278766	SPCC1739.03	SPAC18B11.10	hrr1	tup11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.077467965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792372	2539248	2540945	275818	277461	SPCC1739.03	SPBC342.06c	hrr1	rtt109	-	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.345878165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792373	2539248	2539576	275818	276136	SPCC1739.03	SPCC794.01c	hrr1	zwf2	-	SPCC794.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.192442428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792374	2539248	2539434	275818	275997	SPCC1739.03	SPCC757.09c	hrr1	rnc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811869556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792375	2539248	2539331	275818	275897	SPCC1739.03	SPCC24B10.09	hrr1	rps1702	-	rps17|rps17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449390822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792376	2539248	2539797	275818	276347	SPCC1739.03	SPBC16G5.14c	hrr1	rps3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.614058985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792377	2539248	2541119	275818	277634	SPCC1739.03	SPBC651.11c	hrr1	apm3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.71250967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792378	2539248	2539937	275818	276481	SPCC1739.03	SPBC1539.08	hrr1	arf6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813586234	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792379	2539248	2540727	275818	277250	SPCC1739.03	SPBC1921.03c	hrr1	mex67	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.413568695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792380	2539248	2541323	275818	277835	SPCC1739.03	SPBP35G2.14	hrr1	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262314143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792381	2539248	2541424	275818	277929	SPCC1739.03	SPAC23G3.04	hrr1	ies4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.978745373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792382	2539248	2540344	275818	276873	SPCC1739.03	SPBC30D10.03c	hrr1	SPBC30D10.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.90296956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792383	2539248	2543686	275818	280100	SPCC1739.03	SPAC3C7.14c	hrr1	obr1	-	apt1|uhp1|p25	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.562259653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792384	2539248	2539129	275818	275701	SPCC1739.03	SPCC338.14	hrr1	ado1	-	SPCC338.14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.610854512	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792385	2539248	2542082	275818	278559	SPCC1739.03	SPAC29B12.10c	hrr1	pgt1	-	opt1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455755949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792386	2539248	2543426	275818	279846	SPCC1739.03	SPAC631.02	hrr1	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.559981472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792387	2539248	2539352	275818	275918	SPCC1739.03	SPCC188.07	hrr1	ccq1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.071334495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792388	2539248	2540023	275818	276567	SPCC1739.03	SPBC11C11.10	hrr1	SPBC11C11.10	-	SPBC3B8.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.944827396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792389	2539248	2543078	275818	279511	SPCC1739.03	SPAC31A2.15c	hrr1	dcc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.402561644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792390	2539248	2542640	275818	279094	SPCC1739.03	SPAC9E9.12c	hrr1	ybt1	-	abc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391327005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792391	2539248	2543319	275818	279743	SPCC1739.03	SPAC6B12.09	hrr1	trm10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.009091436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792392	2539248	2540825	275818	277343	SPCC1739.03	SPBC428.08c	hrr1	clr4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.335545502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792393	2539248	2541683	275818	278179	SPCC1739.03	SPAC22G7.03	hrr1	SPAC22G7.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.151100935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792394	2539248	2540319	275818	276849	SPCC1739.03	SPBC30D10.16	hrr1	pha2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.745998948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792395	2539248	2543679	275818	280093	SPCC1739.03	SPAC869.10c	hrr1	put4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392045376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792396	2539248	2541021	275818	277536	SPCC1739.03	SPBC3B8.10c	hrr1	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.998678518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792397	2539248	2540964	275818	277480	SPCC1739.03	SPBC365.16	hrr1	SPBC365.16	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870679035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792398	2539248	2542568	275818	279024	SPCC1739.03	SPAC1952.02	hrr1	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773450307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792399	2539248	2543651	275818	280065	SPCC1739.03	SPAC644.11c	hrr1	pkp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63899933	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792400	2539248	2539098	275818	275670	SPCC1739.03	SPCC24B10.18	hrr1	SPCC24B10.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.039116939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792401	2539248	2543349	275818	279771	SPCC1739.03	SPAC977.02	hrr1	SPAC977.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.628936991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792402	2539248	2541938	275818	278425	SPCC1739.03	SPAC8C9.16c	hrr1	mug63	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.262283981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792403	2539248	2542371	275818	278835	SPCC1739.03	SPACUNK4.17	hrr1	SPACUNK4.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.70411091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792404	2539248	2542952	275818	279392	SPCC1739.03	SPAC12B10.05	hrr1	icp55	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324401708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792405	2539248	2539804	275818	276354	SPCC1739.03	SPBC1105.11c	hrr1	hht3	-	h3.3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.922361179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792406	2539248	2543342	275818	279765	SPCC1739.03	SPAC521.04c	hrr1	sst1	-	SPAC521.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.289573257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792407	2539248	2538821	275818	275402	SPCC1739.03	SPCC584.01c	hrr1	SPCC584.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385267819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792408	2539248	2541392	275818	277902	SPCC1739.03	SPBPB10D8.04c	hrr1	SPBPB10D8.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.327641923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792409	2539248	2543102	275818	279534	SPCC1739.03	SPAC31G5.21	hrr1	SPAC31G5.21	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984360119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792410	2539248	2540892	275818	277408	SPCC1739.03	SPBC530.01	hrr1	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63279172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792411	2539248	2541982	275818	278467	SPCC1739.03	SPAC23A1.06c	hrr1	cmk2	-	mkp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3531345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792412	2539248	2540401	275818	276929	SPCC1739.03	SPBC2A9.02	hrr1	SPBC2A9.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.9345396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792413	2539248	2542707	275818	279160	SPCC1739.03	SPAC25G10.03	hrr1	zip1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097498082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792414	2539248	2540546	275818	277073	SPCC1739.03	SPBC25B2.06c	hrr1	btb2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517912516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792415	2539248	2539990	275818	276534	SPCC1739.03	SPBC1289.14	hrr1	SPBC1289.14	-	SPBC8E4.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.317054333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792416	2539248	2542123	275818	278599	SPCC1739.03	SPAC18G6.15	hrr1	mal3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.052150525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792417	2539248	2542544	275818	279001	SPCC1739.03	SPAC18G6.10	hrr1	lem2	-	heh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.357865686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792418	2539248	2542507	275818	278965	SPCC1739.03	SPAC18G6.13	hrr1	SPAC18G6.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.498096973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792419	2539248	2543412	275818	279834	SPCC1739.03	SPAC637.07	hrr1	moe1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145071405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792420	2539248	2542494	275818	278953	SPCC1739.03	SPAC19D5.07	hrr1	uga1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572132498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792421	2539248	2541889	275818	278379	SPCC1739.03	SPAC2F7.03c	hrr1	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388237758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792422	2539248	2541520	275818	278021	SPCC1739.03	SPAC2E1P5.03	hrr1	SPAC2E1P5.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.807286333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792423	2539248	2541911	275818	278401	SPCC1739.03	SPAC212.04c	hrr1	SPAC212.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509099418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792424	2539248	2539484	275818	276047	SPCC1739.03	SPCC594.04c	hrr1	SPCC594.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.278763997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792425	2539248	2539999	275818	276543	SPCC1739.03	SPBC1734.15	hrr1	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582874591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792426	2539248	2538871	275818	275450	SPCC1739.03	SPCC1259.14c	hrr1	meu27	-	B8647-6	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.326070844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792427	2539248	2542357	275818	278822	SPCC1739.03	SPAC1782.07	hrr1	qcr8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.823315459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792428	2539248	2543118	275818	279550	SPCC1739.03	SPAC3G6.11	hrr1	chl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.771062792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792429	2539248	2541532	275818	278032	SPCC1739.03	SPAC2C4.15c	hrr1	ubx2	-	ucp13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091644389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792430	2539248	2542651	275818	279105	SPCC1739.03	SPAC24C9.12c	hrr1	SPAC24C9.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992159031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792431	2539248	2540661	275818	277186	SPCC1739.03	SPBC23E6.03c	hrr1	nta1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989483445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792432	2539248	2542611	275818	279065	SPCC1739.03	SPAC29A4.05	hrr1	cam2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.910648187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792433	2539248	2542857	275818	279303	SPCC1739.03	SPAC144.06	hrr1	apl5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927626655	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792434	2539248	2540538	275818	277065	SPCC1739.03	SPBC26H8.03	hrr1	cho2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.502845367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792435	2539248	2541420	275818	277926	SPCC1739.03	SPAC22A12.06c	hrr1	SPAC22A12.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64094446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792436	2539248	2543631	275818	280045	SPCC1739.03	SPAC458.02c	hrr1	SPAC458.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.253936823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792437	2539248	2540997	275818	277513	SPCC1739.03	SPBC3H7.06c	hrr1	pof9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.409950226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792438	2539248	2540265	275818	276796	SPCC1739.03	SPBC3E7.12c	hrr1	cfh4	-	chr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.322719172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792439	2539248	2540224	275818	276757	SPCC1739.03	SPBC32H8.06	hrr1	mug93	-	pi018|SPACTOKYO_453.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.050727308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792440	2539248	2539974	275818	276518	SPCC1739.03	SPBC32H8.07	hrr1	git5	-	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19687849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792441	2539248	2542315	275818	278781	SPCC1739.03	SPAC16C9.01c	hrr1	SPAC16C9.01c	-	SPAC4G8.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.413741343	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792442	2539248	2541542	275818	278042	SPCC1739.03	SPAC4G9.02	hrr1	rnh201	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.670822618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792443	2539248	2540836	275818	277354	SPCC1739.03	SPBC18H10.19	hrr1	vps38	-	atg14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462444484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792444	2539248	2540077	275818	276615	SPCC1739.03	SPBC17D11.04c	hrr1	nto1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.610789754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792445	2539248	2542254	275818	278724	SPCC1739.03	SPAC30D11.04c	hrr1	nup124	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.614715812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792446	2539248	2540374	275818	276903	SPCC1739.03	SPBC31F10.02	hrr1	SPBC31F10.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195345018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792447	2539248	2540391	275818	276919	SPCC1739.03	SPBC31F10.05	hrr1	mug37	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.266838479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792448	2539248	2540327	275818	276857	SPCC1739.03	SPBC31F10.07	hrr1	lsb5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.815728027	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792449	2539248	2542398	275818	278862	SPCC1739.03	SPAC1805.03c	hrr1	trm13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808736462	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792450	2539248	2543105	275818	279537	SPCC1739.03	SPAC343.10	hrr1	met11	-	mthfr2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.466254903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792451	2539248	2541009	275818	277524	SPCC1739.03	SPBC428.04	hrr1	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.974113798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792452	2539248	2542712	275818	279165	SPCC1739.03	SPAC25B8.17	hrr1	SPAC25B8.17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.146133757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792453	2539248	2538926	275818	275502	SPCC1739.03	SPCC306.07c	hrr1	SPCC306.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.255915387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792454	2539248	2542439	275818	278901	SPCC1739.03	SPAC17A5.08	hrr1	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153646513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792455	2539248	2540378	275818	276907	SPCC1739.03	SPBC30D10.18c	hrr1	rpl102	-	rpl1-2|rpl10a-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.916542142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792456	2539248	2539376	275818	275942	SPCC1739.03	SPCC5E4.10c	hrr1	SPCC5E4.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448100626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792457	2539248	2539317	275818	275883	SPCC1739.03	SPCC16A11.08	hrr1	atg20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045864733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792458	2539248	2541142	275818	277657	SPCC1739.03	SPBC725.04	hrr1	SPBC725.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320533515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792459	2539248	2541536	275818	278036	SPCC1739.03	SPAC1071.02	hrr1	mms19	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.15198349	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792460	2539248	2540201	275818	276734	SPCC1739.03	SPBC13A2.04c	hrr1	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.14497043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792461	2539248	2540342	275818	276871	SPCC1739.03	SPBC2G2.01c	hrr1	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.413265516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792462	2539248	2543059	275818	279493	SPCC1739.03	SPAC30.04c	hrr1	abc4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98346703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792463	2539248	2542242	275818	278713	SPCC1739.03	SPAC18G6.04c	hrr1	shm2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.211814629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792464	2539248	2542773	275818	279222	SPCC1739.03	SPAC16.01	hrr1	rho2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036984481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792465	2539248	3361030	275818	280106	SPCC1739.03	SPCP20C8.03	hrr1	SPCP20C8.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569763192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792466	2539248	2538690	275818	275275	SPCC1739.03	SPCC1393.05	hrr1	ers1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.509906151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792467	2539248	2538884	275818	275462	SPCC1739.03	SPCC1393.08	hrr1	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.868741137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792468	2539248	2539421	275818	275986	SPCC1739.03	SPCC794.11c	hrr1	ent3	-	SPCC794.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572502075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792469	2539248	2540515	275818	277043	SPCC1739.03	SPBC29A10.09c	hrr1	tri1	-	SPBC29A10.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.200225306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792470	2539248	2542781	275818	279230	SPCC1739.03	SPAC57A10.12c	hrr1	ura3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.752004293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792471	2539248	2540923	275818	277439	SPCC1739.03	SPBC359.01	hrr1	SPBC359.01	-	SPBPB10D8.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711234642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792472	2539248	2540937	275818	277453	SPCC1739.03	SPBC359.05	hrr1	abc3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812755175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792473	2539248	2543515	275818	279933	SPCC1739.03	SPAC4F10.14c	hrr1	btf3	-	btt1|egd1|nac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.830849153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792474	2539248	2540930	275818	277446	SPCC1739.03	SPBC354.10	hrr1	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.628548866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792475	2539248	2540703	275818	277227	SPCC1739.03	SPBC20F10.07	hrr1	SPBC20F10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.630608717	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792476	2539248	3361526	275818	280602	SPCC1739.03	SPAC664.15	hrr1	caf4	-	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632477537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792477	2539248	2542748	275818	279198	SPCC1739.03	SPAC15A10.09c	hrr1	pun1	-	SPAC15A10.09c|sur7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770956288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792478	2539248	2538848	275818	275429	SPCC1739.03	SPCC613.12c	hrr1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.494387156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792479	2539248	2542869	275818	279314	SPCC1739.03	SPAC140.02	hrr1	gar2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392139486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792480	2539248	2541144	275818	277659	SPCC1739.03	SPBC685.06	hrr1	rps001	-	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389095951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792481	2539248	2541762	275818	278256	SPCC1739.03	SPAC139.01c	hrr1	SPAC139.01c	-	SPAC955.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.402762444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792482	2539248	2539908	275818	276454	SPCC1739.03	SPBC13E7.06	hrr1	msd1	-	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517562558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792483	2539248	2540001	275818	276545	SPCC1739.03	SPBC1289.13c	hrr1	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.435564186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792484	2539248	2539706	275818	276259	SPCC1739.03	SPBC16G5.13	hrr1	ptf2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.456901542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792485	2539248	2542806	275818	279254	SPCC1739.03	SPAC1610.01	hrr1	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.622100788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792486	2539248	2542198	275818	278673	SPCC1739.03	SPAC6F12.09	hrr1	rdp1	-	rdr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.66536345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792487	2539248	2541786	275818	278278	SPCC1739.03	SPAC22F3.08c	hrr1	rok1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.566745438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792488	2539248	2543398	275818	279820	SPCC1739.03	SPAC4A8.02c	hrr1	SPAC4A8.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.055816047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792489	2539248	2541156	275818	277671	SPCC1739.03	SPBC685.07c	hrr1	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.17415877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792490	2539248	2542759	275818	279209	SPCC1739.03	SPAC9G1.07	hrr1	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.565433428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792491	2539248	2539101	275818	275673	SPCC1739.03	SPCC736.04c	hrr1	gma12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.910845676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792492	2539248	2541287	275818	277800	SPCC1739.03	SPBP22H7.05c	hrr1	abo2	-	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.464102601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792493	2539248	2542516	275818	278974	SPCC1739.03	SPAC2F7.04	hrr1	pmc2	-	med1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.877079685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792494	2539248	2538815	275818	275396	SPCC1739.03	SPCC1322.15	hrr1	rpl3402	-	rpl34|rpl34-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508431063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792495	2539248	2540121	275818	276658	SPCC1739.03	SPBC119.14	hrr1	rti1	-	rad22B	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380783073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792496	2539248	2543567	275818	279983	SPCC1739.03	SPAC890.03	hrr1	ppk16	-	mug92	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.50294251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792497	2539248	2543267	275818	279695	SPCC1739.03	SPAC1002.12c	hrr1	SPAC1002.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508092116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792498	2539248	2541973	275818	278458	SPCC1739.03	SPAC6G9.13c	hrr1	bqt1	-	mug23|rec26	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922068574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792499	2539248	2539770	275818	276321	SPCC1739.03	SPBC1685.11	hrr1	rlp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19325772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792500	2539248	2539799	275818	276349	SPCC1739.03	SPBC106.11c	hrr1	plg7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.762180159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792501	2539248	2543096	275818	279528	SPCC1739.03	SPAC977.05c	hrr1	SPAC977.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.192558039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792502	2539248	2541432	275818	277937	SPCC1739.03	SPAC1F5.05c	hrr1	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.986640405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792503	2539248	2539239	275818	275809	SPCC1739.03	SPCC1020.10	hrr1	oca2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038151715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792504	2539248	2542997	275818	279435	SPCC1739.03	SPAC11E3.14	hrr1	SPAC11E3.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327155538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792505	2539248	2541367	275818	277878	SPCC1739.03	SPBP8B7.13	hrr1	vac7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380444585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792506	2539248	2540346	275818	276875	SPCC1739.03	SPBC2F12.03c	hrr1	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.334912482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792507	2539248	2539013	275818	275586	SPCC1739.03	SPCC364.03	hrr1	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.338201815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792508	2539248	2541470	275818	277972	SPCC1739.03	SPAPYUG7.04c	hrr1	rpb9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.714620856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792509	2539248	2543329	275818	279752	SPCC1739.03	SPAC56F8.02	hrr1	SPAC56F8.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044603367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792510	2539248	2538916	275818	275493	SPCC1739.03	SPCC16C4.17	hrr1	mug123	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.565680943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792511	2539248	2541229	275818	277743	SPCC1739.03	SPBC839.05c	hrr1	rps1701	-	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256010914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792512	2539248	2541036	275818	277551	SPCC1739.03	SPBC3H7.05c	hrr1	SPBC3H7.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87354014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792513	2539248	2539729	275818	276281	SPCC1739.03	SPBC11B10.07c	hrr1	ivn1	-	pi004|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.263007875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792514	2539248	2543091	275818	279524	SPCC1739.03	SPAC12G12.15	hrr1	sif3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924742657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792515	2539248	2539722	275818	276275	SPCC1739.03	SPBC14F5.11c	hrr1	mug186	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.128220047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792516	2539248	2540297	275818	276828	SPCC1739.03	SPBC24C6.08c	hrr1	bhd1	-	bhd	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.986263249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792517	2539248	2540245	275818	276777	SPCC1739.03	SPBC31F10.17c	hrr1	SPBC31F10.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.988160989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792518	2539248	2540992	275818	277508	SPCC1739.03	SPBC342.05	hrr1	crb2	-	rhp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637517168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792519	2539248	2539251	275818	275821	SPCC1739.03	SPCC24B10.02c	hrr1	SPCC24B10.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384645538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792520	2539248	2543672	275818	280086	SPCC1739.03	SPAC4H3.01	hrr1	SPAC4H3.01	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933633814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792521	2539248	2542305	275818	278772	SPCC1739.03	SPAC8C9.10c	hrr1	rrp14	-	SPAC8C9.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.204633821	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792522	2539248	2539928	275818	276472	SPCC1739.03	SPBC1604.08c	hrr1	imp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928213341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792523	2539248	2540489	275818	277017	SPCC1739.03	SPBC25H2.03	hrr1	SPBC25H2.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.276399713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792524	2539248	3361511	275818	280587	SPCC1739.03	SPAC23C4.08	hrr1	rho3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.917557258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792525	2539248	2542442	275818	278904	SPCC1739.03	SPACUNK12.02c	hrr1	cmk1	-	CaMK-I|SPAC25D11.02C	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.504700554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792526	2539248	2540278	275818	276809	SPCC1739.03	SPBC1A4.04	hrr1	SPBC1A4.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462422898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792527	2539248	2539375	275818	275941	SPCC1739.03	SPCC4G3.11	hrr1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.271470114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792528	2539248	2540551	275818	277078	SPCC1739.03	SPBC23E6.01c	hrr1	cxr1	-	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.188437233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792529	2539248	2539901	275818	276447	SPCC1739.03	SPBC17A3.08	hrr1	SPBC17A3.08	-	pi038	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866967739	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792530	2539248	2543072	275818	279505	SPCC1739.03	SPAC3A12.09c	hrr1	SPAC3A12.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.34210465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792531	2539248	2541941	275818	278428	SPCC1739.03	SPAC20H4.03c	hrr1	tfs1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.198742425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792532	2539248	2542244	275818	278714	SPCC1739.03	SPAC19G12.13c	hrr1	poz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.665874316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792533	2539248	2541398	275818	277907	SPCC1739.03	SPBPB2B2.11	hrr1	SPBPB2B2.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877830528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792534	2539248	2542716	275818	279169	SPCC1739.03	SPAC25H1.07	hrr1	emc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815776045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792535	2539248	2543513	275818	279931	SPCC1739.03	SPAC821.06	hrr1	spn2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810350232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792536	2539248	2539700	275818	276253	SPCC1739.03	SPBC1685.15c	hrr1	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.439273299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792537	2539248	2543400	275818	279822	SPCC1739.03	SPAC3G9.11c	hrr1	SPAC3G9.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.381731691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792538	2539248	2541129	275818	277644	SPCC1739.03	SPBC713.11c	hrr1	pmp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.074522488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792539	2539248	2541466	275818	277968	SPCC1739.03	SPAC14C4.06c	hrr1	nab2	-	SPAC14C4.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.323879678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792540	2539248	2539768	275818	276319	SPCC1739.03	SPBC1703.09	hrr1	SPBC1703.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713436801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792541	2539248	2539743	275818	276295	SPCC1739.03	SPBC16A3.08c	hrr1	oga1	-	SPBC16A3.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.501347647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792542	2539248	2539440	275818	276003	SPCC1739.03	SPCC550.08	hrr1	SPCC550.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.151392718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792543	2539248	2542700	275818	279153	SPCC1739.03	SPAC26H5.08c	hrr1	bgl2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514376563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792544	2539248	2543372	275818	279794	SPCC1739.03	SPAPB1A10.09	hrr1	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.048830035	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792545	2539248	2543644	275818	280058	SPCC1739.03	SPAPB1A10.03	hrr1	nxt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325895482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792546	2539248	2541431	275818	277936	SPCC1739.03	SPAC1F3.08c	hrr1	SPAC1F3.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.515511281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792547	2539248	2540309	275818	276839	SPCC1739.03	SPBC21B10.13c	hrr1	yox1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933641325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792548	2539248	2542943	275818	279384	SPCC1739.03	SPBC1348.03	hrr1	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.419905051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792549	2539248	2543646	275818	280060	SPCC1739.03	SPAC821.07c	hrr1	moc3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.762721875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792550	2539248	2542617	275818	279071	SPCC1739.03	SPAC13A11.01c	hrr1	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.770283636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792551	2539248	2541236	275818	277750	SPCC1739.03	SPBC887.11	hrr1	pus2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.270261858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792552	2539248	2543616	275818	280030	SPCC1739.03	SPAC4A8.09c	hrr1	cwf21	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.507293281	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792553	2540497	2540653	277025	277178	SPBC27.04	SPBC215.07c	uds1	SPBC215.07c	-	pdp2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.11761322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792554	2540497	2543164	277025	279595	SPBC27.04	SPAC3G6.06c	uds1	rad2	-	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.0930305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792555	2540497	2542220	277025	278694	SPBC27.04	SPAC1A6.03c	uds1	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.311004212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792556	2540497	2538762	277025	275345	SPBC27.04	SPCC306.04c	uds1	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.114880201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792557	2541124	2540131	277639	276668	SPBC646.02	SPBC1778.05c	cwf11	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.26425053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792558	2541124	2542555	277639	279012	SPBC646.02	SPAC1952.06c	cwf11	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.163599913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792559	2541124	2542277	277639	278746	SPBC646.02	SPAC17A5.02c	cwf11	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.237395175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792560	2541124	2539845	277639	276393	SPBC646.02	SPBC12C2.02c	cwf11	ste20	-	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.39171333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792561	2541124	2539733	277639	276285	SPBC646.02	SPBC16E9.12c	cwf11	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.495458784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792562	2541124	2540852	277639	277369	SPBC646.02	SPBC428.12c	cwf11	SPBC428.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.552155546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792563	2541124	2543443	277639	279863	SPBC646.02	SPAC3H1.12c	cwf11	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.170439322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792564	2541124	2539925	277639	276469	SPBC646.02	SPBC16H5.13	cwf11	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.800477335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792565	2540067	2538961	276605	275535	SPBC16H5.05c	SPCC285.14	cyp7	trs130	cwf27	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783715504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792566	2540067	2543414	276605	279836	SPBC16H5.05c	SPAC630.10	cyp7	SPAC630.10	cwf27	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8682456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792567	2540067	2542098	276605	278574	SPBC16H5.05c	SPAC30D11.01c	cyp7	gto2	cwf27	SPAC30D11.01c|SPAC56F8.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.281575595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792568	2540067	2541086	276605	277601	SPBC16H5.05c	SPBC685.04c	cyp7	aps2	cwf27	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378968959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792569	2540067	2540251	276605	276783	SPBC16H5.05c	SPBC336.05c	cyp7	SPBC336.05c	cwf27	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.946691643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792570	2540067	2540160	276605	276695	SPBC16H5.05c	SPBC1773.17c	cyp7	SPBC1773.17c	cwf27	SPBP26C9.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.244575956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792571	2540067	2541105	276605	277620	SPBC16H5.05c	SPBC685.02	cyp7	exo5	cwf27	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.344028141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792572	2540067	2542861	276605	279307	SPBC16H5.05c	SPAC13G7.13c	cyp7	msa1	cwf27	SPAC6C3.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.850928921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792573	2540067	2543253	276605	279681	SPBC16H5.05c	SPAC8C9.05	cyp7	SPAC8C9.05	cwf27	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.337981781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792574	2540067	2540882	276605	277399	SPBC16H5.05c	SPBC4F6.08c	cyp7	mrpl39	cwf27	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391562085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792575	2540067	2539354	276605	275920	SPBC16H5.05c	SPCC4F11.03c	cyp7	SPCC4F11.03c	cwf27	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.56422888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792576	2540067	2542883	276605	279328	SPBC16H5.05c	SPAC1486.04c	cyp7	alm1	cwf27	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.31418338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792577	2540067	2541372	276605	277883	SPBC16H5.05c	SPBP8B7.28c	cyp7	stc1	cwf27	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379561213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792578	2540067	2543329	276605	279752	SPBC16H5.05c	SPAC56F8.02	cyp7	SPAC56F8.02	cwf27	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.33613377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792579	2543667	2540060	280081	276598	SPAC4H3.02c	SPBC106.01	swc3	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.561650043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792580	2543667	3361561	280081	280637	SPAC4H3.02c	SPAC11E3.01c	swc3	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.500724962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792581	2543667	2540347	280081	276876	SPAC4H3.02c	SPBC30B4.08	swc3	eri1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.886739205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792582	2543667	2539510	280081	276072	SPAC4H3.02c	SPCC4G3.04c	swc3	coq5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931712009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792583	2543667	2542816	280081	279263	SPAC4H3.02c	SPAC4G8.11c	swc3	atp10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153213634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792584	2543667	2539564	280081	276125	SPAC4H3.02c	SPCC550.12	swc3	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038930726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792585	2543667	2542318	280081	278784	SPAC4H3.02c	SPAC16C9.05	swc3	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.952016849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792586	2543667	2540595	280081	277121	SPAC4H3.02c	SPBC21C3.02c	swc3	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.546574417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792587	2543667	2543563	280081	279979	SPAC4H3.02c	SPAC664.02c	swc3	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453686428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792588	2543667	2539023	280081	275596	SPAC4H3.02c	SPCC594.05c	swc3	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.824136648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792589	2543667	2542311	280081	278777	SPAC4H3.02c	SPAC16A10.05c	swc3	dad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.799355811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792590	2543667	2541776	280081	278270	SPAC4H3.02c	SPAC23H3.05c	swc3	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.944988668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792591	2543667	2540673	280081	277198	SPAC4H3.02c	SPBC1D7.03	swc3	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.740069413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792592	2543667	2541889	280081	278379	SPAC4H3.02c	SPAC2F7.03c	swc3	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509442823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792593	2543667	2539603	280081	276161	SPAC4H3.02c	SPBC1289.06c	swc3	ppr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327720897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792594	2543667	2543643	280081	280057	SPAC4H3.02c	SPAC3G9.07c	swc3	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.482081643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792595	2543667	2541899	280081	278389	SPAC4H3.02c	SPAC22E12.11c	swc3	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.305075138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792596	2543667	2540086	280081	276624	SPAC4H3.02c	SPBC16H5.12c	swc3	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387380239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792597	2543667	2541710	280081	278205	SPAC4H3.02c	SPAC343.11c	swc3	msc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87792402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792598	2543667	2539667	280081	276222	SPAC4H3.02c	SPBC13G1.08c	swc3	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.338735822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792599	2543667	2542976	280081	279414	SPAC4H3.02c	SPAC9E9.09c	swc3	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.631809522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792600	2543667	2542254	280081	278724	SPAC4H3.02c	SPAC30D11.04c	swc3	nup124	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867064795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792601	2543667	2539408	280081	275973	SPAC4H3.02c	SPCC576.12c	swc3	mhf2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201253431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792602	2543667	2543443	280081	279863	SPAC4H3.02c	SPAC3H1.12c	swc3	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.880888278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792603	2543667	2540967	280081	277483	SPAC4H3.02c	SPBC36B7.08c	swc3	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.009924156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792604	2543667	2541337	280081	277848	SPAC4H3.02c	SPBP35G2.13c	swc3	swc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.557302546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792605	2543667	2542806	280081	279254	SPAC4H3.02c	SPAC1610.01	swc3	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38466815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792606	2543667	2539842	280081	276390	SPAC4H3.02c	SPBC14C8.15	swc3	SPBC14C8.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.143491366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792607	2543667	2538966	280081	275540	SPAC4H3.02c	SPCC18.10	swc3	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.935331974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792608	2543667	2541531	280081	278031	SPAC4H3.02c	SPAC25A8.01c	swc3	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.497572197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792609	2543667	2542306	280081	278773	SPAC4H3.02c	SPAC29A4.11	swc3	rga3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.902086399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792610	2543667	2542418	280081	278881	SPAC4H3.02c	SPAC1805.07c	swc3	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.974974214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792611	2543667	2543427	280081	279847	SPAC4H3.02c	SPAPB1A10.15	swc3	arv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325757546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792612	2543667	2539668	280081	276223	SPAC4H3.02c	SPBC11B10.10c	swc3	pht1	-	pi001	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.868968969	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792613	2543667	2539205	280081	275775	SPAC4H3.02c	SPCC4B3.15	swc3	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.786875032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792614	2543667	2542886	280081	279331	SPAC4H3.02c	SPAC1486.01	swc3	SPAC1486.01	-	sod2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.055097218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792615	2543667	2541478	280081	277980	SPAC4H3.02c	SPAC2F7.17	swc3	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.342477049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792616	2541153	2542207	277668	278682	SPBC725.16	SPAC17H9.10c	res1	ddb1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.707663806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792617	2541153	2539050	277668	275623	SPBC725.16	SPCC11E10.08	res1	rik1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384929904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792618	2541153	2541495	277668	277997	SPBC725.16	SPAP8A3.02c	res1	ofd2	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.271800173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792619	2541153	2542895	277668	279339	SPBC725.16	SPAC13G6.10c	res1	asl1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386404748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792620	2541153	2538796	277668	275377	SPBC725.16	SPCC63.06	res1	SPCC63.06	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.838302194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792621	2541153	2541204	277668	277718	SPBC725.16	SPBC839.06	res1	cta3	sct1	SPBC24E9.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.506583469	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792622	2541153	2540060	277668	276598	SPBC725.16	SPBC106.01	res1	mph1	sct1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.142778126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792623	2541153	2540942	277668	277458	SPBC725.16	SPBC3H7.14	res1	mug176	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.845736771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792624	2541153	2542598	277668	279052	SPBC725.16	SPAC6G10.08	res1	idp1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329261072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792625	2541153	2542080	277668	278557	SPBC725.16	SPAC27D7.03c	res1	mei2	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.567254288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792626	2541153	3361499	277668	280575	SPBC725.16	SPAC25H1.09	res1	mde5	sct1	SPAC4A8.01|meu30	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.665301262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792627	2541153	2542382	277668	278846	SPBC725.16	SPAC6G10.06	res1	SPAC6G10.06	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.693963634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792628	2541153	2540833	277668	277351	SPBC725.16	SPBC18H10.20c	res1	any1	sct1	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.845250432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792629	2541153	2539949	277668	276493	SPBC725.16	SPBC1703.04	res1	mlh1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.839112292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792630	2541153	2542372	277668	278836	SPBC725.16	SPAC1F3.03	res1	SPAC1F3.03	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.414292564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792631	2541153	2539566	277668	276126	SPBC725.16	SPCC736.13	res1	SPCC736.13	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.404568386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792632	2541153	2543152	277668	279584	SPBC725.16	SPAC869.03c	res1	SPAC869.03c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443671959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792633	2541153	2542066	277668	278543	SPBC725.16	SPAC227.05	res1	SPAC227.05	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.464113791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792634	2541153	2540435	277668	276963	SPBC725.16	SPBC25B2.03	res1	SPBC25B2.03	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.259254733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792635	2541153	2541570	277668	278067	SPBC725.16	SPAC6G9.09c	res1	rpl2401	sct1	rpl24|rpl24-01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.910636111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792636	2541153	2539749	277668	276301	SPBC725.16	SPBC16A3.13	res1	meu7	sct1	aah4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.977203157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792637	2541153	2543287	277668	279712	SPBC725.16	SPAC9E9.05	res1	SPAC9E9.05	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.281032451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792638	2541153	2539167	277668	275738	SPBC725.16	SPCC1281.08	res1	wtf11	sct1	meu24	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.516028314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792639	2541153	3361171	277668	280247	SPBC725.16	SPBPB10D8.03	res1	SPBPB10D8.03	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043699551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792640	2541153	2543064	277668	279497	SPBC725.16	SPAC3G6.01	res1	hrp3	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.358888072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792641	2541153	2540131	277668	276668	SPBC725.16	SPBC1778.05c	res1	SPBC1778.05c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.982296677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792642	2541153	2541032	277668	277547	SPBC725.16	SPBC3H7.11	res1	SPBC3H7.11	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.681638055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792643	2541153	2539156	277668	275728	SPBC725.16	SPCC1450.08c	res1	wtf16	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.681714336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792644	2541153	2541552	277668	278051	SPBC725.16	SPAC1142.08	res1	fhl1	sct1	SPAC8C9.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706467706	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792645	2541153	2543575	277668	279990	SPBC725.16	SPAC644.13c	res1	SPAC644.13c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.766328771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792646	2541153	2543211	277668	279640	SPBC725.16	SPAC12B10.15c	res1	SPAC12B10.15c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814946032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792647	2541153	2541650	277668	278146	SPBC725.16	SPAC14C4.12c	res1	laf1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.752713091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792648	2541153	2540528	277668	277056	SPBC725.16	SPBC18H10.04c	res1	sce3	sct1	tif48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991249548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792649	2541153	2540745	277668	277268	SPBC725.16	SPBC21C3.18	res1	spo4	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928092596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792650	2541153	2543339	277668	279762	SPBC725.16	SPAC630.13c	res1	tsc2	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.076680025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792651	2541153	2538896	277668	275474	SPBC725.16	SPCC584.11c	res1	SPCC584.11c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.316229009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792652	2541153	2539930	277668	276474	SPBC725.16	SPBC1198.11c	res1	reb1	sct1	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.300864199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792653	2541153	2539202	277668	275773	SPBC725.16	SPCC162.10	res1	ppk33	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.024078408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792654	2541153	2541822	277668	278313	SPBC725.16	SPAC1F7.10	res1	SPAC1F7.10	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.192665764	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792655	2541153	2538857	277668	275437	SPBC725.16	SPCC1442.05c	res1	SPCC1442.05c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.691651694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792656	2541153	2539939	277668	276483	SPBC725.16	SPBC11G11.01	res1	fis1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.349692054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792657	2541153	2541853	277668	278344	SPBC725.16	SPAC2F3.11	res1	SPAC2F3.11	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511426294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792658	2541153	2541002	277668	277517	SPBC725.16	SPBC3E7.07c	res1	SPBC3E7.07c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.877047306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792659	2541153	2542502	277668	278960	SPBC725.16	SPAC139.06	res1	hat1	sct1	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324634136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792660	2541153	2543594	277668	280009	SPBC725.16	SPAC8F11.05c	res1	mug130	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099272521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792661	2541153	2539196	277668	275767	SPBC725.16	SPCC1795.03	res1	gms1	sct1	gmn3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196630605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792662	2541153	2541681	277668	278177	SPBC725.16	SPAC14C4.01c	res1	SPAC14C4.01c	sct1	SPAC19D5.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984656776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792663	2541153	2543432	277668	279852	SPBC725.16	SPAC4G8.05	res1	ppk14	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.412413071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792664	2541153	2542546	277668	279003	SPBC725.16	SPAC1399.05c	res1	toe1	sct1	SPAC1399.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812276608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792665	2541153	2541374	277668	277885	SPBC725.16	SPBPB10D8.06c	res1	SPBPB10D8.06c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.853403535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792666	2541153	2540402	277668	276930	SPBC725.16	SPBC30D10.05c	res1	SPBC30D10.05c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.272427153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792667	2541153	2543164	277668	279595	SPBC725.16	SPAC3G6.06c	res1	rad2	sct1	fen1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197731572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792668	2541153	2542492	277668	278951	SPBC725.16	SPAC1B9.02c	res1	sck1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.557555649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792669	2541153	2539800	277668	276350	SPBC725.16	SPBC1347.13c	res1	mrm1	sct1	SPBC1347.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.556855925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792670	2541153	2543680	277668	280094	SPBC725.16	SPAC4G9.20c	res1	SPAC4G9.20c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101143546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792671	2541153	2542614	277668	279068	SPBC725.16	SPAC1399.04c	res1	SPAC1399.04c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.41905878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792672	2541153	2540686	277668	277211	SPBC725.16	SPBC21D10.10	res1	bdc1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.490724576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792673	2541153	2539890	277668	276436	SPBC725.16	SPBC16C6.03c	res1	SPBC16C6.03c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.957099664	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792674	2541153	2538922	277668	275499	SPBC725.16	SPCC16C4.10	res1	SPCC16C4.10	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.574399623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792675	2541153	2542103	277668	278579	SPBC725.16	SPAC31G5.11	res1	pac2	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.534706095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792676	2541153	2543103	277668	279535	SPBC725.16	SPAC3F10.09	res1	SPAC3F10.09	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.065217984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792677	2541153	2540579	277668	277105	SPBC725.16	SPBC28E12.02	res1	SPBC28E12.02	sct1	SPBC9B6.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.919321407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792678	2541153	2542345	277668	278811	SPBC725.16	SPAC1705.02	res1	SPAC1705.02	sct1	SPAC1F2.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.31736915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792679	2541153	2540455	277668	276983	SPBC725.16	SPBC215.05	res1	gpd1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454060167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792680	2541153	2541361	277668	277872	SPBC725.16	SPBP8B7.10c	res1	utp16	sct1	SPBP8B7.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.26315663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792681	2541153	2540999	277668	277515	SPBC725.16	SPBC4B4.04	res1	SPBC4B4.04	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.805255744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792682	2541153	3361570	277668	280646	SPBC725.16	SPAC750.01	res1	SPAC750.01	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330349181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792683	2541153	2540975	277668	277491	SPBC725.16	SPBC354.12	res1	gpd3	sct1	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.075873598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792684	2541153	2541795	277668	278286	SPBC725.16	SPAC2E1P3.02c	res1	amt3	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196860426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792685	2541153	2540015	277668	276559	SPBC725.16	SPBC1685.02c	res1	rps1202	sct1	rps12-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.43957116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792686	2541153	2541208	277668	277722	SPBC725.16	SPBC887.04c	res1	lub1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.316225209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792687	2541153	2542450	277668	278911	SPBC725.16	SPAC13C5.04	res1	SPAC13C5.04	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781387117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792688	2541153	2542179	277668	278654	SPBC725.16	SPAC17C9.12	res1	scs22	sct1	SPAC17C9.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865358612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792689	2541153	2541013	277668	277528	SPBC725.16	SPBC3H7.13	res1	far10	sct1	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.866613707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792690	2541153	2540979	277668	277495	SPBC725.16	SPBC3H7.10	res1	elp6	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.988952597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792691	2541153	2539735	277668	276287	SPBC725.16	SPBC1773.04	res1	SPBC1773.04	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.341567689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792692	2541153	2542273	277668	278742	SPBC725.16	SPAC17H9.13c	res1	SPAC17H9.13c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.230197815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792693	2541153	2541019	277668	277534	SPBC725.16	SPBC3B8.07c	res1	dsd1	sct1	SDCB3B8.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.192837126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792694	2541153	2541500	277668	278002	SPBC725.16	SPAC227.18	res1	lys3	sct1	SPAC2F7.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.642964089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792695	2541153	2541058	277668	277573	SPBC725.16	SPBC3H7.09	res1	erf2	sct1	mug142	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.567618093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792696	2541153	2541498	277668	278000	SPBC725.16	SPAC227.10	res1	SPAC227.10	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.267463264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792697	2541153	2543156	277668	279587	SPBC725.16	SPAP8A3.13c	res1	SPAP8A3.13c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.513363487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792698	2541153	2541483	277668	277985	SPBC725.16	SPAC227.14	res1	SPAC227.14	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196343595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792699	2541153	2539913	277668	276457	SPBC725.16	SPBC11G11.03	res1	mrt4	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.82813275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792700	2541153	2542714	277668	279167	SPBC725.16	SPAC5H10.06c	res1	adh4	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979946799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792701	2541153	2539564	277668	276125	SPBC725.16	SPCC550.12	res1	arp6	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.679250043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792702	2541153	2539264	277668	275834	SPBC725.16	SPCC550.10	res1	atd3	sct1	meu8	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.763841771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792703	2541153	2541285	277668	277798	SPBC725.16	SPBC9B6.09c	res1	mdl1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.132563018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792704	2541153	2543288	277668	279713	SPBC725.16	SPAC6C3.03c	res1	SPAC6C3.03c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.282102494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792705	2541153	2543260	277668	279688	SPBC725.16	SPAC1002.17c	res1	urg2	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.266506009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792706	2541153	2542299	277668	278766	SPBC725.16	SPAC18B11.10	res1	tup11	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.68124627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792707	2541153	2538801	277668	275382	SPBC725.16	SPCC285.13c	res1	nup60	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.888751892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792708	2541153	2542689	277668	279142	SPBC725.16	SPAC29B12.04	res1	snz1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256836908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792709	2541153	2542709	277668	279162	SPBC725.16	SPAC26F1.08c	res1	SPAC26F1.08c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.71400772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792710	2541153	2539472	277668	276035	SPBC725.16	SPCC794.03	res1	SPCC794.03	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.206579809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792711	2541153	2540945	277668	277461	SPBC725.16	SPBC342.06c	res1	rtt109	sct1	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.195784466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792712	2541153	2539576	277668	276136	SPBC725.16	SPCC794.01c	res1	zwf2	sct1	SPCC794.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.637465686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792713	2541153	2543159	277668	279590	SPBC725.16	SPAC3C7.09	res1	set8	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.610578521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792714	2541153	2543453	277668	279873	SPBC725.16	SPAC3G9.03	res1	rpl2301	sct1	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.095734189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792715	2541153	2538934	277668	275510	SPBC725.16	SPCC24B10.03	res1	SPCC24B10.03	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869089402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792716	2541153	2541541	277668	278041	SPBC725.16	SPAC1F7.11c	res1	SPAC1F7.11c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037972936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792717	2541153	2539797	277668	276347	SPBC725.16	SPBC16G5.14c	res1	rps3	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.625992329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792718	2541153	2542987	277668	279425	SPBC725.16	SPAC12B10.11	res1	exg2	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812651856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792719	2541153	2540929	277668	277445	SPBC725.16	SPBC354.03	res1	swd3	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.615314607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792720	2541153	2541809	277668	278300	SPBC725.16	SPAC22A12.11	res1	dak1	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148466556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792721	2541153	3361385	277668	280461	SPBC725.16	SPAC1639.02c	res1	trk2	sct1	SPAC1F5.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444809044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792722	2541153	2539937	277668	276481	SPBC725.16	SPBC1539.08	res1	arf6	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.566885502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792723	2541153	2543547	277668	279964	SPBC725.16	SPAC926.02	res1	SPAC926.02	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.203819278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792724	2541153	2539988	277668	276532	SPBC725.16	SPBC1271.05c	res1	SPBC1271.05c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.272483322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792725	2541153	2541669	277668	278165	SPBC725.16	SPAC22G7.07c	res1	ime4	sct1	SPAC22G7.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.982823421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792726	2541153	2539063	277668	275635	SPBC725.16	SPCC126.12	res1	SPCC126.12	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923791873	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792727	2541153	2540727	277668	277250	SPBC725.16	SPBC1921.03c	res1	mex67	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.965701973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792728	2541153	2542022	277668	278505	SPBC725.16	SPAC23A1.03	res1	apt1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.982454574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792729	2541153	2540790	277668	277309	SPBC725.16	SPBC6B1.05c	res1	atg7	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.568264414	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792730	2541153	2543586	277668	280001	SPBC725.16	SPAC458.04c	res1	dli1	sct1	dil1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979274318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792731	2541153	2542135	277668	278611	SPBC725.16	SPAC13A11.04c	res1	ubp8	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318229202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792732	2541153	2542023	277668	278506	SPBC725.16	SPAC20H4.10	res1	ufd2	sct1	SPAC145.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.060242317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792733	2541153	2541527	277668	278027	SPBC725.16	SPAC31A2.09c	res1	apm4	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.634646065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792734	2541153	2542277	277668	278746	SPBC725.16	SPAC17A5.02c	res1	dbr1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.122478038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792735	2541153	2539792	277668	276342	SPBC725.16	SPBC1271.14	res1	SPBC1271.14	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.487372666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792736	2541153	2539823	277668	276373	SPBC725.16	SPBC16A3.18	res1	cip1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.324353059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792737	2541153	2538823	277668	275404	SPBC725.16	SPCC18B5.02c	res1	SPCC18B5.02c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.924690397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792738	2541153	2540851	277668	277368	SPBC725.16	SPBC4F6.04	res1	rpl2502	sct1	rpl23a-2|rpl25b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.013354093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792739	2541153	2540595	277668	277121	SPBC725.16	SPBC21C3.02c	res1	dep1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.0133633	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792740	2541153	2542220	277668	278694	SPBC725.16	SPAC1A6.03c	res1	SPAC1A6.03c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.644854137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792741	2541153	2541580	277668	278077	SPBC725.16	SPAC1687.05	res1	pli1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.836046204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792742	2541153	2543326	277668	279749	SPBC725.16	SPAC56F8.12	res1	SPAC56F8.12	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.516224642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792743	2541153	2540663	277668	277188	SPBC725.16	SPBC56F2.06	res1	mug147	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.126868409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792744	2541153	2540344	277668	276873	SPBC725.16	SPBC30D10.03c	res1	SPBC30D10.03c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.751228417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792745	2541153	2542649	277668	279103	SPBC725.16	SPAC24C9.14	res1	otu1	sct1	mug141	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.564011639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792746	2541153	2539981	277668	276525	SPBC725.16	SPBC1289.09	res1	tim21	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.192843211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792747	2541153	2541568	277668	278065	SPBC725.16	SPAC11D3.09	res1	SPAC11D3.09	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.149234158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792748	2541153	2541105	277668	277620	SPBC725.16	SPBC685.02	res1	exo5	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.554758208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792749	2541153	2541195	277668	277709	SPBC725.16	SPBC839.17c	res1	fkh1	sct1	SPBC24E9.17c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092655937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792750	2541153	2541923	277668	278411	SPBC725.16	SPAC23C4.09c	res1	SPAC23C4.09c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.001944556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792751	2541153	2539961	277668	276505	SPBC725.16	SPBC1198.09	res1	ubc16	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.466619807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792752	2541153	2543641	277668	280055	SPBC725.16	SPAC3H5.08c	res1	SPAC3H5.08c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.435874525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792753	2541153	2539244	277668	275814	SPBC725.16	SPCC1672.06c	res1	asp1	sct1	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.155843148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792754	2541153	2541295	277668	277807	SPBC725.16	SPBC947.09	res1	hsp3103	sct1	SPBC947.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.567278814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792755	2541153	2543563	277668	279979	SPBC725.16	SPAC664.02c	res1	arp8	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.769990568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792756	2541153	2538698	277668	275283	SPBC725.16	SPCC1442.02	res1	SPCC1442.02	sct1	SPCC1450.18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.672461602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792757	2541153	2542082	277668	278559	SPBC725.16	SPAC29B12.10c	res1	pgt1	sct1	opt1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.313264551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792758	2541153	3361149	277668	280225	SPBC725.16	SPCC1919.06c	res1	wtf25	sct1	wtf9-pseudo	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.771504239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792759	2541153	2541004	277668	277519	SPBC725.16	SPBC3F6.01c	res1	SPBC3F6.01c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03790485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792760	2541153	2543584	277668	279999	SPBC725.16	SPAPB1E7.11c	res1	SPAPB1E7.11c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.255774788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792761	2541153	2539858	277668	276405	SPBC725.16	SPBC16E9.06c	res1	uvi31	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.31658403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792762	2541153	2542530	277668	278988	SPBC725.16	SPAC1399.02	res1	SPAC1399.02	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931764625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792763	2541153	2543319	277668	279743	SPBC725.16	SPAC6B12.09	res1	trm10	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.815079669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792764	2541153	2538972	277668	275546	SPBC725.16	SPCC1739.15	res1	wtf21	sct1	wtf3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.452923128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792765	2541153	2538906	277668	275483	SPBC725.16	SPCC1259.03	res1	rpa12	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.977372497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792766	2541153	2539092	277668	275664	SPBC725.16	SPCC1259.08	res1	SPCC1259.08	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.516710324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792767	2541153	3361456	277668	280532	SPBC725.16	SPAC1142.03c	res1	swi2	sct1	SPAC17G6.20c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.714825921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792768	2541153	2542845	277668	279291	SPBC725.16	SPAC824.04	res1	SPAC824.04	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.108220048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792769	2541153	2542213	277668	278687	SPBC725.16	SPAC3G6.13c	res1	rpl4101	sct1	rpl41-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.615119262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792770	2541153	2542791	277668	279240	SPBC725.16	SPAC167.04	res1	pam17	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.141558903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792771	2541153	2539478	277668	276041	SPBC725.16	SPCC550.07	res1	SPCC550.07	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.98392061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792772	2541153	2540825	277668	277343	SPBC725.16	SPBC428.08c	res1	clr4	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.764208107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792773	2541153	2541926	277668	278414	SPBC725.16	SPAC222.14c	res1	SPAC222.14c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.665083348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792774	2541153	2540359	277668	276888	SPBC725.16	SPBC30D10.14	res1	SPBC30D10.14	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.46369595	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792775	2541153	2541812	277668	278303	SPBC725.16	SPAC23G3.12c	res1	SPAC23G3.12c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807371248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792776	2541153	2541021	277668	277536	SPBC725.16	SPBC3B8.10c	res1	nem1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.684426059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792777	2541153	2541246	277668	277760	SPBC725.16	SPBC8E4.02c	res1	SPBC8E4.02c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145360963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792778	2541153	2540893	277668	277409	SPBC725.16	SPBC543.10	res1	get1	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.03888807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792779	2541153	2540964	277668	277480	SPBC725.16	SPBC365.16	res1	SPBC365.16	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.088663944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792780	2541153	2542568	277668	279024	SPBC725.16	SPAC1952.02	res1	tma23	sct1	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.903144752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792781	2541153	2543651	277668	280065	SPBC725.16	SPAC644.11c	res1	pkp1	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871185837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792782	2541153	2541384	277668	277895	SPBC725.16	SPBP8B7.26	res1	SPBP8B7.26	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093847274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792783	2541153	2541700	277668	278196	SPBC725.16	SPAC32A11.02c	res1	SPAC32A11.02c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817020085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792784	2541153	2541275	277668	277789	SPBC725.16	SPBC947.06c	res1	SPBC947.06c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.714779666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792785	2541153	2539467	277668	276030	SPBC725.16	SPCC417.07c	res1	mto1	sct1	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.893636237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792786	2541153	2539388	277668	275953	SPBC725.16	SPCC24B10.12	res1	cgi121	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.899199695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792787	2541153	2541938	277668	278425	SPBC725.16	SPAC8C9.16c	res1	mug63	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700786392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792788	2541153	2540834	277668	277352	SPBC725.16	SPBC18H10.18c	res1	SPBC18H10.18c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445977824	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792789	2541153	2540906	277668	277422	SPBC725.16	SPBC365.20c	res1	pnc1	sct1	SPBC557.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.615946206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792790	2541153	2543514	277668	279932	SPBC725.16	SPAC4D7.03	res1	pop2	sct1	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.135809308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792791	2541153	2542952	277668	279392	SPBC725.16	SPAC12B10.05	res1	icp55	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.456083335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792792	2541153	2539051	277668	275624	SPBC725.16	SPCC1183.11	res1	msy1	sct1	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.916999629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792793	2541153	2542950	277668	279390	SPBC725.16	SPAC12B10.03	res1	bun62	sct1	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.752716885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792794	2541153	2541664	277668	278160	SPBC725.16	SPAC2H10.01	res1	SPAC2H10.01	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.509305737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792795	2541153	2540312	277668	276842	SPBC725.16	SPBC31F10.08	res1	mde2	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320858114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792796	2541153	2543020	277668	279456	SPBC725.16	SPAC10F6.13c	res1	SPAC10F6.13c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.49426591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792797	2541153	2542177	277668	278652	SPBC725.16	SPAC17H9.08	res1	SPAC17H9.08	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.000621436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792798	2541153	2539003	277668	275577	SPBC725.16	SPCC1442.17c	res1	ist1	sct1	SPCC285.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.324585341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792799	2541153	2538821	277668	275402	SPBC725.16	SPCC584.01c	res1	SPCC584.01c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.496258342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792800	2541153	2540797	277668	277316	SPBC725.16	SPBC18H10.11c	res1	ppr2	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.84465838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792801	2541153	2542964	277668	279404	SPBC725.16	SPAC12G12.07c	res1	SPAC12G12.07c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.982024793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792802	2541153	2541801	277668	278292	SPBC725.16	SPAC2F7.08c	res1	snf5	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.194094326	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792803	2541153	2542513	277668	278971	SPBC725.16	SPAC1952.05	res1	gcn5	sct1	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.309704702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792804	2541153	2541776	277668	278270	SPBC725.16	SPAC23H3.05c	res1	swd1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.550739375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792805	2541153	2542105	277668	278581	SPBC725.16	SPAC14C4.15c	res1	SPAC14C4.15c	sct1	SPAPJ760.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990501212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792806	2541153	2543144	277668	279576	SPBC725.16	SPAC3F10.05c	res1	mug113	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043942695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792807	2541153	2543385	277668	279807	SPBC725.16	SPAC4G9.12	res1	SPAC4G9.12	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813312059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792808	2541153	2543593	277668	280008	SPBC725.16	SPAC4G9.10	res1	arg3	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.212752657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792809	2541153	2541545	277668	278045	SPBC725.16	SPAC22F8.07c	res1	rtf1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.947413569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792810	2541153	2538770	277668	275353	SPBC725.16	SPCC1753.02c	res1	git3	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926905371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792811	2541153	2543483	277668	279903	SPBC725.16	SPAPB2B4.02	res1	grx5	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.56334747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792812	2541153	2541038	277668	277553	SPBC725.16	SPBC29A10.01	res1	ccr1	sct1	SPBC365.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.561105681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792813	2541153	2538811	277668	275392	SPBC725.16	SPCC330.03c	res1	SPCC330.03c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32060948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792814	2541153	3361491	277668	280567	SPBC725.16	SPAC1805.08	res1	dlc1	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.340285751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792815	2541153	2542123	277668	278599	SPBC725.16	SPAC18G6.15	res1	mal3	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.257055387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792816	2541153	2538706	277668	275290	SPBC725.16	SPCC338.08	res1	ctp1	sct1	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.992469308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792817	2541153	2542507	277668	278965	SPBC725.16	SPAC18G6.13	res1	SPAC18G6.13	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.124351632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792818	2541153	2541543	277668	278043	SPBC725.16	SPAC5H10.04	res1	SPAC5H10.04	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.937059623	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792819	2541153	2543412	277668	279834	SPBC725.16	SPAC637.07	res1	moe1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.372493859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792820	2541153	2539754	277668	276306	SPBC725.16	SPBC16C6.04	res1	dbl6	sct1	SPBC16C6.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035680277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792821	2541153	2540396	277668	276924	SPBC725.16	SPBC31F10.12	res1	tma20	sct1	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.547234313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792822	2541153	2541735	277668	278229	SPBC725.16	SPAC7D4.04	res1	atg11	sct1	taf1|cvt9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.789881103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792823	2541153	2542420	277668	278883	SPBC725.16	SPAC19D5.03	res1	cid1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.908655168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792824	2541153	2539898	277668	276444	SPBC725.16	SPBC12D12.07c	res1	trx2	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.88896676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792825	2541153	2541520	277668	278021	SPBC725.16	SPAC2E1P5.03	res1	SPAC2E1P5.03	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.206907161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792826	2541153	2543510	277668	279928	SPBC725.16	SPAC30D11.07	res1	nth1	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935341716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792827	2541153	2541928	277668	278416	SPBC725.16	SPAC227.03c	res1	SPAC227.03c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992684641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792828	2541153	2542168	277668	278643	SPBC725.16	SPAC17A5.16	res1	ftp105	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.014819177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792829	2541153	2539371	277668	275937	SPBC725.16	SPCC18B5.06	res1	dom34	sct1	SPCC18B5.06|erf1|sup45	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.4396843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792830	2541153	2541258	277668	277772	SPBC725.16	SPBC8E4.01c	res1	SPBC8E4.01c	sct1	SPBP4G3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.347103669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792831	2541153	2542227	277668	278700	SPBC725.16	SPAC5H10.13c	res1	gmh2	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.342390405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792832	2541153	2539484	277668	276047	SPBC725.16	SPCC594.04c	res1	SPCC594.04c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.816327861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792833	2541153	2542873	277668	279318	SPBC725.16	SPAC9G1.02	res1	wis4	sct1	wak1|wik1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.907013688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792834	2541153	2542428	277668	278890	SPBC725.16	SPAC1805.12c	res1	uep1	sct1	ubi2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.142780306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792835	2541153	2542521	277668	278979	SPBC725.16	SPAC18G6.12c	res1	SPAC18G6.12c	sct1	B22918-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.155144898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792836	2541153	2541496	277668	277998	SPBC725.16	SPAC23D3.09	res1	arp42	sct1	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.066466892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792837	2541153	2542216	277668	278690	SPBC725.16	SPAC19A8.02	res1	SPAC19A8.02	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.980682079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792838	2541153	2542452	277668	278913	SPBC725.16	SPAC1D4.02c	res1	SPAC1D4.02c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04306759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792839	2541153	2541929	277668	278417	SPBC725.16	SPAC23C4.12	res1	hhp2	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870165572	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792840	2541153	2539857	277668	276404	SPBC725.16	SPBC1604.20c	res1	tea2	sct1	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.382186216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792841	2541153	2541310	277668	277822	SPBC725.16	SPBP18G5.03	res1	toc1	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200491835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792842	2541153	2541532	277668	278032	SPBC725.16	SPAC2C4.15c	res1	ubx2	sct1	ucp13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.056920097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792843	2541153	2542902	277668	279346	SPBC725.16	SPAC144.05	res1	SPAC144.05	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.103217094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792844	2541153	2539624	277668	276181	SPBC725.16	SPBC1289.16c	res1	cao2	sct1	SPBC8E4.06|spao2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092208352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792845	2541153	2543250	277668	279678	SPBC725.16	SPAC3G9.15c	res1	fcf2	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.631937945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792846	2541153	2538852	277668	275433	SPBC725.16	SPCC4E9.01c	res1	rec11	sct1	SPCC550.16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571582128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792847	2541153	2543057	277668	279491	SPBC725.16	SPAC694.03	res1	SPAC694.03	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091343528	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792848	2541153	2541983	277668	278468	SPBC725.16	SPAC20G8.08c	res1	fft1	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.923388564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792849	2541153	2541704	277668	278199	SPBC725.16	SPAC1250.04c	res1	atl1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.34815253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792850	2541153	2541401	277668	277910	SPBC725.16	SPBPB10D8.05c	res1	SPBPB10D8.05c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818676283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792851	2541153	2538769	277668	275352	SPBC725.16	SPCC126.04c	res1	sgf73	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.027602648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792852	2541153	2543631	277668	280045	SPBC725.16	SPAC458.02c	res1	SPAC458.02c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.670831356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792853	2541153	2541830	277668	278321	SPBC725.16	SPAC5H10.01	res1	SPAC5H10.01	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.818339402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792854	2541153	2542782	277668	279231	SPBC725.16	SPAC1687.06c	res1	rpl44	sct1	rpl28	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818571628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792855	2541153	2542032	277668	278514	SPBC725.16	SPAC23C11.04c	res1	pnk1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.090676631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792856	2541153	2540136	277668	276673	SPBC725.16	SPBC1347.11	res1	sro1	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.126914504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792857	2541153	2539000	277668	275574	SPBC725.16	SPCC1450.06c	res1	grx3	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.42226591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792858	2541153	2540997	277668	277513	SPBC725.16	SPBC3H7.06c	res1	pof9	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.726794149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792859	2541153	2538873	277668	275452	SPBC725.16	SPCC306.11	res1	SPCC306.11	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.316898511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792860	2541153	2538970	277668	275544	SPBC725.16	SPCC306.10	res1	wtf8	sct1	wtf3-pseudo	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.184556991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792861	2541153	2542710	277668	279163	SPBC725.16	SPAC750.08c	res1	SPAC750.08c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988141901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792862	2541153	2543244	277668	279672	SPBC725.16	SPAC6B12.06c	res1	rrg9	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.674159626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792863	2541153	2543389	277668	279811	SPBC725.16	SPAPB1A11.02	res1	SPAPB1A11.02	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.562287854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792864	2541153	2540256	277668	276787	SPBC725.16	SPBC32F12.12c	res1	SPBC32F12.12c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87321083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792865	2541153	2542946	277668	279386	SPBC725.16	SPAC6F12.03c	res1	fsv1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.771419411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792866	2541153	2538880	277668	275459	SPBC725.16	SPCC1393.09c	res1	SPCC1393.09c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780640622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792867	2541153	2538982	277668	275556	SPBC725.16	SPCC1450.12	res1	SPCC1450.12	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.380435032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792868	2541153	2539815	277668	276365	SPBC725.16	SPBC1105.02c	res1	lys4	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.298158642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792869	2541153	2542020	277668	278503	SPBC725.16	SPAC5D6.09c	res1	mug86	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.192832445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792870	2541153	2540427	277668	276955	SPBC725.16	SPBC2A9.13	res1	SPBC2A9.13	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808545658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792871	2541153	2540107	277668	276644	SPBC725.16	SPBC106.08c	res1	mug2	sct1	B13958-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570201105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792872	2541153	2543236	277668	279664	SPBC725.16	SPAC8C9.04	res1	SPAC8C9.04	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.075826006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792873	2541153	2540077	277668	276615	SPBC725.16	SPBC17D11.04c	res1	nto1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.085992688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792874	2541153	2538841	277668	275422	SPBC725.16	SPCC550.03c	res1	SPCC550.03c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.268656279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792875	2541153	2543357	277668	279779	SPBC725.16	SPAC688.12c	res1	SPAC688.12c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462269227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792876	2541153	2539958	277668	276502	SPBC725.16	SPBC1718.07c	res1	zfs1	sct1	moc4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779487307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792877	2541153	2541900	277668	278390	SPBC725.16	SPAC23H4.17c	res1	srb10	sct1	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.195607767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792878	2541153	2542867	277668	279312	SPBC725.16	SPAC343.16	res1	lys2	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.274540494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792879	2541153	2540374	277668	276903	SPBC725.16	SPBC31F10.02	res1	SPBC31F10.02	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.879414836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792880	2541153	2540391	277668	276919	SPBC725.16	SPBC31F10.05	res1	mug37	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.872189972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792881	2541153	2542549	277668	279006	SPBC725.16	SPAC19A8.11c	res1	SPAC19A8.11c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701703494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792882	2541153	2542519	277668	278977	SPBC725.16	SPAC19G12.08	res1	scs7	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927665392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792883	2541153	2539481	277668	276044	SPBC725.16	SPCC622.16c	res1	epe1	sct1	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.333967445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792884	2541153	2539027	277668	275600	SPBC725.16	SPCC1322.08	res1	srk1	sct1	mkp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932246211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792885	2541153	2539215	277668	275785	SPBC725.16	SPCC285.16c	res1	msh6	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.912247459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792886	2541153	2543683	277668	280097	SPBC725.16	SPAPB1E7.04c	res1	SPAPB1E7.04c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.872409773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792887	2541153	2542056	277668	278535	SPBC725.16	SPAC6G9.14	res1	SPAC6G9.14	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.564161965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792888	2541153	2540990	277668	277506	SPBC725.16	SPBC36B7.06c	res1	mug20	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.682120757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792889	2541153	2539317	277668	275883	SPBC725.16	SPCC16A11.08	res1	atg20	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.934619192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792890	2541153	2543561	277668	279977	SPBC725.16	SPAC922.04	res1	SPAC922.04	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.082409587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792891	2541153	2539348	277668	275914	SPBC725.16	SPCC18B5.07c	res1	nup61	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.706063195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792892	2541153	2539740	277668	276292	SPBC725.16	SPBC1685.04	res1	SPBC1685.04	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935484327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792893	2541153	2542125	277668	278601	SPBC725.16	SPAP8A3.03	res1	SPAP8A3.03	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.823313403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792894	2541153	2538708	277668	275292	SPBC725.16	SPCC594.01	res1	SPCC594.01	sct1	SPCC736.16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.758679323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792895	2541153	2538923	277668	275500	SPBC725.16	SPCC18.02	res1	SPCC18.02	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.343168493	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792896	2541153	2541536	277668	278036	SPBC725.16	SPAC1071.02	res1	mms19	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.678746459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792897	2541153	2541708	277668	278203	SPBC725.16	SPAC31A2.02	res1	trm112	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.183325273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792898	2541153	2543224	277668	279652	SPBC725.16	SPAPB8E5.10	res1	SPAPB8E5.10	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980210204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792899	2541153	2541464	277668	277966	SPBC725.16	SPAC222.08c	res1	SPAC222.08c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.977944594	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792900	2541153	2541961	277668	278448	SPBC725.16	SPAC23C4.02	res1	crn1	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808549065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792901	2541153	2541959	277668	278446	SPBC725.16	SPAC23C4.03	res1	hrk1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.478640082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792902	2541153	2540342	277668	276871	SPBC725.16	SPBC2G2.01c	res1	liz1	sct1	SPBC4B4.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.921808846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792903	2541153	2542996	277668	279434	SPBC725.16	SPAC1039.06	res1	SPAC1039.06	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449158927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792904	2541153	2543307	277668	279731	SPBC725.16	SPAC694.05c	res1	rps2502	sct1	rps25|rps25-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933568524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792905	2541153	2543059	277668	279493	SPBC725.16	SPAC30.04c	res1	abc4	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929958903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792906	2541153	2542597	277668	279051	SPBC725.16	SPAP8A3.07c	res1	SPAP8A3.07c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.687513884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792907	2541153	2540599	277668	277125	SPBC725.16	SPBC29A3.10c	res1	atp14	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.116018172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792908	2541153	2543517	277668	279935	SPBC725.16	SPAC3G9.05	res1	spa2	sct1	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702905122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792909	2541153	2542242	277668	278713	SPBC725.16	SPAC18G6.04c	res1	shm2	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.534649937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792910	2541153	2542773	277668	279222	SPBC725.16	SPAC16.01	res1	rho2	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.41076021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792911	2541153	2540850	277668	277367	SPBC725.16	SPBC18A7.02c	res1	SPBC18A7.02c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.03108148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792912	2541153	2541296	277668	277808	SPBC725.16	SPBP8B7.06	res1	rpp201	sct1	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.119114583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792913	2541153	2541266	277668	277780	SPBC725.16	SPBP16F5.05c	res1	yar1	sct1	SPBP16F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.693058283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792914	2541153	2540844	277668	277361	SPBC725.16	SPBC1921.04c	res1	SPBC1921.04c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.517547034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792915	2541153	2540882	277668	277399	SPBC725.16	SPBC4F6.08c	res1	mrpl39	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709159817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792916	2541153	2543331	277668	279754	SPBC725.16	SPAC56E4.07	res1	SPAC56E4.07	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143221328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792917	2541153	2540533	277668	277061	SPBC725.16	SPBC29A10.16c	res1	SPBC29A10.16c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.618702002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792918	2541153	2543350	277668	279772	SPBC725.16	SPAC56E4.03	res1	SPAC56E4.03	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.079330631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792919	2541153	2541614	277668	278111	SPBC725.16	SPAC29A4.20	res1	elp3	sct1	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379500866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792920	2541153	2541565	277668	278063	SPBC725.16	SPAC1250.03	res1	ubc14	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.467913492	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792921	2541153	2539711	277668	276264	SPBC725.16	SPBC1683.09c	res1	frp1	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.432730726	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792922	2541153	2540687	277668	277212	SPBC725.16	SPBC21D10.08c	res1	SPBC21D10.08c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.669635396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792923	2541153	2542550	277668	279007	SPBC725.16	SPAC1B3.02c	res1	SPAC1B3.02c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707364675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792924	2541153	2538884	277668	275462	SPBC725.16	SPCC1393.08	res1	SPCC1393.08	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.983564587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792925	2541153	3361105	277668	280181	SPBC725.16	SPCC188.10c	res1	SPCC188.10c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094896175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792926	2541153	2542255	277668	278725	SPBC725.16	SPAC57A7.08	res1	pzh1	sct1	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.162148674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792927	2541153	2543477	277668	279897	SPBC725.16	SPAPB2B4.04c	res1	SPAPB2B4.04c	sct1	pmc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.344920452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792928	2541153	2543011	277668	279449	SPBC725.16	SPAC10F6.11c	res1	atg17	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322257597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792929	2541153	2539349	277668	275915	SPBC725.16	SPCC613.11c	res1	meu23	sct1	B13958-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448103867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792930	2541153	2539113	277668	275685	SPBC725.16	SPCC1919.11	res1	mug137	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047887114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792931	2541153	2539569	277668	276129	SPBC725.16	SPCPB16A4.03c	res1	ade10	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576658062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792932	2541153	2539812	277668	276362	SPBC725.16	SPBC1347.02	res1	fkbp39	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.484451248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792933	2541153	2539605	277668	276163	SPBC725.16	SPBC1105.13c	res1	SPBC1105.13c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.629206091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792934	2541153	3361134	277668	280210	SPBC725.16	SPCC737.09c	res1	hmt1	sct1	SPCC74.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980244371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792935	2541153	2543254	277668	279682	SPBC725.16	SPAC1006.03c	res1	red1	sct1	iss3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643933266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792936	2541153	2542781	277668	279230	SPBC725.16	SPAC57A10.12c	res1	ura3	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.198966297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792937	2541153	2543139	277668	279571	SPBC725.16	SPAC12G12.03	res1	cip2	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868978119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792938	2541153	2543515	277668	279933	SPBC725.16	SPAC4F10.14c	res1	btf3	sct1	btt1|egd1|nac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.228417696	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792939	2541153	2540930	277668	277446	SPBC725.16	SPBC354.10	res1	def1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.878913019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792940	2541153	3361526	277668	280602	SPBC725.16	SPAC664.15	res1	caf4	sct1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703069658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792941	2541153	2538848	277668	275429	SPBC725.16	SPCC613.12c	res1	raf1	sct1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.135205518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792942	2541153	3361520	277668	280596	SPBC725.16	SPAC1610.02c	res1	SPAC1610.02c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.911914925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792943	2541153	2542869	277668	279314	SPBC725.16	SPAC140.02	res1	gar2	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.380662161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792944	2541153	2541144	277668	277659	SPBC725.16	SPBC685.06	res1	rps001	sct1	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.261371811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792945	2541153	2542875	277668	279320	SPBC725.16	SPAC13G7.02c	res1	ssa1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.709468924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792946	2541153	2540918	277668	277434	SPBC725.16	SPBC800.02	res1	whi5	sct1	mug54	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.952879184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792947	2541153	2541713	277668	278208	SPBC725.16	SPAC3A12.12	res1	atp11	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.686332314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792948	2541153	2543213	277668	279642	SPBC725.16	SPAC12B10.16c	res1	mug157	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.263626886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792949	2541153	2542170	277668	278645	SPBC725.16	SPAC17G8.13c	res1	mst2	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.49692852	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792950	2541153	2539706	277668	276259	SPBC725.16	SPBC16G5.13	res1	ptf2	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.48587484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792951	2541153	2542283	277668	278751	SPBC725.16	SPAC27F1.08	res1	pdt1	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.202323505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792952	2541153	2541670	277668	278166	SPBC725.16	SPAC24H6.13	res1	SPAC24H6.13	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.274068677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792953	2541153	2542806	277668	279254	SPBC725.16	SPAC1610.01	res1	saf5	sct1	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.880977837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792954	2541153	2541786	277668	278278	SPBC725.16	SPAC22F3.08c	res1	rok1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.20118319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792955	2541153	2542407	277668	278871	SPBC725.16	SPAC19B12.06c	res1	SPAC19B12.06c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.925550748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792956	2541153	2543391	277668	279813	SPBC725.16	SPAC4G9.09c	res1	arg11	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.255619828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792957	2541153	2541156	277668	277671	SPBC725.16	SPBC685.07c	res1	rpl2701	sct1	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.093798325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792958	2541153	2542547	277668	279004	SPBC725.16	SPACUNK4.09	res1	SPACUNK4.09	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.090430125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792959	2541153	2539499	277668	276062	SPBC725.16	SPCC622.08c	res1	hta1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.561589173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792960	2541153	2543051	277668	279486	SPBC725.16	SPAC1071.08	res1	rpp203	sct1	rla6|rpp2-3|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.138771228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792961	2541153	2538844	277668	275425	SPBC725.16	SPCC1183.09c	res1	pmp31	sct1	mug75	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092122765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792962	2541153	2543619	277668	280033	SPBC725.16	SPAC4F10.04	res1	ypa1	sct1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.154311713	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792963	2541153	2539555	277668	276116	SPBC725.16	SPCC4B3.08	res1	lsg1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.552511083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792964	2541153	2540619	277668	277145	SPBC725.16	SPBC25H2.15	res1	SPBC25H2.15	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.994272058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792965	2541153	2542286	277668	278754	SPBC725.16	SPAC1786.01c	res1	ptl2	sct1	SPAC1786.01c|SPAC31G5.20c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.766615555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792966	2541153	2539157	277668	275729	SPBC725.16	SPCC1919.12c	res1	SPCC1919.12c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.563812227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792967	2541153	2542767	277668	279217	SPBC725.16	SPAC1565.07c	res1	knd1	sct1	SPAC1565.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.257393521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792968	2541153	2540242	277668	276774	SPBC725.16	SPBC32F12.07c	res1	SPBC32F12.07c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.764265779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792969	2541153	2542167	277668	278642	SPBC725.16	SPAC17C9.11c	res1	SPAC17C9.11c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818076516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792970	2541153	2540605	277668	277131	SPBC725.16	SPBC21C3.09c	res1	SPBC21C3.09c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817315689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792971	2541153	2538815	277668	275396	SPBC725.16	SPCC1322.15	res1	rpl3402	sct1	rpl34|rpl34-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87008056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792972	2541153	2541175	277668	277689	SPBC725.16	SPBC839.13c	res1	rpl1601	sct1	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.335903471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792973	2541153	2539137	277668	275709	SPBC725.16	SPCC1682.08c	res1	mcp2	sct1	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.028386227	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792974	2541153	2543670	277668	280084	SPBC725.16	SPAPB1E7.06c	res1	eme1	sct1	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386248014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792975	2541153	2543567	277668	279983	SPBC725.16	SPAC890.03	res1	ppk16	sct1	mug92	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.376317193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792976	2541153	2541909	277668	278399	SPBC725.16	SPAC227.01c	res1	erd1	sct1	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.325723649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792977	2541153	2539108	277668	275680	SPBC725.16	SPCC1223.02	res1	nmt1	sct1	thi3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324562288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792978	2541153	2540648	277668	277173	SPBC725.16	SPBC1921.05	res1	ape2	sct1	ape1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.95460554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792979	2541153	2540384	277668	276913	SPBC725.16	SPBC29A10.11c	res1	vps902	sct1	vps9b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.505666584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792980	2541153	2540464	277668	276992	SPBC725.16	SPBC23E6.02	res1	rrp2	sct1	SPBC23E6.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820086146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792981	2541153	2540531	277668	277059	SPBC725.16	SPBC23E6.08	res1	sat1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.03329775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792982	2541153	2543160	277668	279591	SPBC725.16	SPAC31A2.14	res1	bun107	sct1	wdr48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.136078685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792983	2541153	2538962	277668	275536	SPBC725.16	SPCC965.13	res1	SPCC965.13	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814954661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792984	2541153	2541279	277668	277792	SPBC725.16	SPBC8E4.03	res1	SPBC8E4.03	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.122050912	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792985	2541153	2542294	277668	278762	SPBC725.16	SPAC1805.09c	res1	fmt1	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042719727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792986	2541153	2539614	277668	276172	SPBC725.16	SPBC17D11.08	res1	SPBC17D11.08	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.668698466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792987	2541153	2541358	277668	277869	SPBC725.16	SPBP4H10.16c	res1	SPBP4H10.16c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924548192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792988	2541153	2541432	277668	277937	SPBC725.16	SPAC1F5.05c	res1	mso1	sct1	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.443804437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792989	2541153	2543192	277668	279621	SPBC725.16	SPAC343.18	res1	rfp2	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205154643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792990	2541153	2543662	277668	280076	SPBC725.16	SPAC9.07c	res1	SPAC9.07c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.134397259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792991	2541153	2541425	277668	277930	SPBC725.16	SPAC2C4.17c	res1	msy2	sct1	SPAC2C4.17c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.339463036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792992	2541153	2542458	277668	278919	SPBC725.16	SPAC30.02c	res1	SPAC30.02c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.987565998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792993	2541153	2541531	277668	278031	SPBC725.16	SPAC25A8.01c	res1	fft3	sct1	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453672225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792994	2541153	2540346	277668	276875	SPBC725.16	SPBC2F12.03c	res1	ebs1	sct1	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.106838954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792995	2541153	2542355	277668	278820	SPBC725.16	SPAC29A4.13	res1	SPAC29A4.13	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.560716197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792996	2541153	2539359	277668	275925	SPBC725.16	SPCC16C4.06c	res1	pus3	sct1	SPCC16C4.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.998093865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792997	2541153	2541678	277668	278174	SPBC725.16	SPAP7G5.05	res1	rpl1002	sct1	rpl10|rpl10-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.201670345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792998	2541153	2540699	277668	277223	SPBC725.16	SPBC800.08	res1	gcd10	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.124504687	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
792999	2541153	2540829	277668	277347	SPBC725.16	SPBC800.09	res1	sum2	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.980995536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793000	2541153	2540000	277668	276544	SPBC725.16	SPBC1683.13c	res1	cha4	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.515361208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793001	2541153	2543329	277668	279752	SPBC725.16	SPAC56F8.02	res1	SPAC56F8.02	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.007279986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793002	2541153	2541797	277668	278288	SPBC725.16	SPAC22F3.04	res1	mug62	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.270021036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793003	2541153	2542418	277668	278881	SPBC725.16	SPAC1805.07c	res1	dad2	sct1	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.320656092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793004	2541153	2541638	277668	278134	SPBC725.16	SPAC2F7.06c	res1	pol4	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779175711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793005	2541153	2541229	277668	277743	SPBC725.16	SPBC839.05c	res1	rps1701	sct1	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.832060762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793006	2541153	2543377	277668	279799	SPBC725.16	SPAC3H1.07	res1	aru1	sct1	car3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.540037152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793007	2541153	2541535	277668	278035	SPBC725.16	SPAC12G12.10	res1	wdr21	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03763302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793008	2541153	2543439	277668	279859	SPBC725.16	SPAPB1A10.13	res1	SPAPB1A10.13	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.076888785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793009	2541153	2543437	277668	279857	SPBC725.16	SPAPB1A10.14	res1	pof15	sct1	SPAPB1A10.14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042561215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793010	2541153	2541743	277668	278237	SPBC725.16	SPAC22H10.13	res1	zym1	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.148996846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793011	2541153	2542826	277668	279273	SPBC725.16	SPAC13G6.09	res1	SPAC13G6.09	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.983256998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793012	2541153	2541773	277668	278267	SPBC725.16	SPAC23H4.02	res1	ppk9	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582472361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793013	2541153	2540516	277668	277044	SPBC725.16	SPBC21C3.01c	res1	vps13a	sct1	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.840743083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793014	2541153	2543420	277668	279842	SPBC725.16	SPAC3H1.04c	res1	mdm31	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.628386373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793015	2541153	2539488	277668	276051	SPBC725.16	SPCC645.08c	res1	snd1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637139271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793016	2541153	2540927	277668	277443	SPBC725.16	SPBC365.06	res1	pmt3	sct1	smt3|ubl2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.909939265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793017	2541153	2543633	277668	280047	SPBC725.16	SPAC3H8.05c	res1	mms1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.841146164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793018	2541153	2540936	277668	277452	SPBC725.16	SPBC800.05c	res1	atb2	sct1	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511086013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793019	2541153	2543044	277668	279479	SPBC725.16	SPAC3C7.12	res1	tip1	sct1	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.423494544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793020	2541153	2543528	277668	279946	SPBC725.16	SPAC4F10.17	res1	SPAC4F10.17	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.660836072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793021	2541153	2540489	277668	277017	SPBC725.16	SPBC25H2.03	res1	SPBC25H2.03	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455327829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793022	2541153	2539205	277668	275775	SPBC725.16	SPCC4B3.15	res1	mid1	sct1	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.885077736	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793023	2541153	2540667	277668	277192	SPBC725.16	SPBC211.06	res1	gfh1	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.435400692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793024	2541153	2542904	277668	279348	SPBC725.16	SPAC144.11	res1	rps1102	sct1	rps11|rps11-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.383804432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793025	2541153	2540278	277668	276809	SPBC725.16	SPBC1A4.04	res1	SPBC1A4.04	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.003028612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793026	2541153	2539920	277668	276464	SPBC725.16	SPBC119.08	res1	pmk1	sct1	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.914375283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793027	2541153	2540140	277668	276677	SPBC725.16	SPBC16C6.08c	res1	qcr6	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443482752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793028	2541153	5802702	277668	857840	SPBC725.16	SPCC1235.15	res1	dga1	sct1	SPCC548.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.817364955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793029	2541153	2543569	277668	279984	SPBC725.16	SPAPB24D3.03	res1	SPAPB24D3.03	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044677999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793030	2541153	2542186	277668	278661	SPBC725.16	SPAC17C9.14	res1	SPAC17C9.14	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04390283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793031	2541153	2543380	277668	279802	SPBC725.16	SPAC4G9.16c	res1	rpl901	sct1	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.215704099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793032	2541153	2539178	277668	275749	SPBC725.16	SPCC1682.14	res1	rpl1902	sct1	rpl19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.192341476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793033	2541153	2543337	277668	279760	SPBC725.16	SPAC959.08	res1	rpl2102	sct1	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.907006038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793034	2541153	2542021	277668	278504	SPBC725.16	SPAP14E8.02	res1	tos4	sct1	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.100314715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793035	2541153	2542423	277668	278885	SPBC725.16	SPAC17G6.08	res1	pep7	sct1	vac1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576667319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793036	2541153	2539483	277668	276046	SPBC725.16	SPCC584.02	res1	cuf2	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.717096549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793037	2541153	2539169	277668	275740	SPBC725.16	SPCC1235.11	res1	mpc1	sct1	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.036454284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793038	2541153	2541238	277668	277752	SPBC725.16	SPBC8E4.05c	res1	SPBC8E4.05c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444123639	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793039	2541153	2540683	277668	277208	SPBC725.16	SPBC19G7.04	res1	SPBC19G7.04	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.07823118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793040	2541153	2542716	277668	279169	SPBC725.16	SPAC25H1.07	res1	emc1	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813979047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793041	2541153	2543379	277668	279801	SPBC725.16	SPAC821.09	res1	eng1	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.458798014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793042	2541153	2539700	277668	276253	SPBC725.16	SPBC1685.15c	res1	klp6	sct1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.220534174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793043	2541153	2543400	277668	279822	SPBC725.16	SPAC3G9.11c	res1	SPAC3G9.11c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381342838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793044	2541153	2541675	277668	278171	SPBC725.16	SPAC22F8.12c	res1	shf1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511586554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793045	2541153	2541357	277668	277868	SPBC725.16	SPBPB7E8.01	res1	SPBPB7E8.01	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.816752709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793046	2541153	2539573	277668	276133	SPBC725.16	SPCC965.06	res1	osr2	sct1	SPCC965.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154415056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793047	2541153	2542185	277668	278660	SPBC725.16	SPAC18G6.01c	res1	SPAC18G6.01c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922563417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793048	2541153	2538827	277668	275408	SPBC725.16	SPCC63.14	res1	eis1	sct1	SPCC63.14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810761308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793049	2541153	2541806	277668	278297	SPBC725.16	SPAC4G8.13c	res1	prz1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.283260076	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793050	2541153	2543387	277668	279809	SPBC725.16	SPAPB1E7.02c	res1	mcl1	sct1	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.96625202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793051	2541153	2543327	277668	279750	SPBC725.16	SPAC1D4.06c	res1	csk1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443310502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793052	2541153	2542159	277668	278635	SPBC725.16	SPAC1834.09	res1	mug51	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571553591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793053	2541153	2538854	277668	275435	SPBC725.16	SPCP1E11.05c	res1	are2	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503114501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793054	2541153	2542886	277668	279331	SPBC725.16	SPAC1486.01	res1	SPAC1486.01	sct1	sod2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455436787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793055	2541153	2543520	277668	279938	SPBC725.16	SPAC607.10	res1	spo3	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145032922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793056	2541153	2539531	277668	276093	SPBC725.16	SPCC576.02	res1	SPCC576.02	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.614823741	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793057	2541153	2543060	277668	279494	SPBC725.16	SPAC30C2.08	res1	SPAC30C2.08	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817655566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793058	2541153	2543087	277668	279520	SPBC725.16	SPAC30C2.04	res1	SPAC30C2.04	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.021814139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793059	2541153	2542175	277668	278650	SPBC725.16	SPAC1F3.02c	res1	mkh1	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097549082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793060	2541153	2542795	277668	279243	SPBC725.16	SPAC9G1.05	res1	aip1	sct1	SPAC9G1.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.828224373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793061	2541153	2538920	277668	275497	SPBC725.16	SPCC1840.05c	res1	SPCC1840.05c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.946275205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793062	2541153	2540360	277668	276889	SPBC725.16	SPBC2G5.01	res1	SPBC2G5.01	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.697648198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793063	2541153	2541003	277668	277518	SPBC725.16	SPBC3E7.16c	res1	leu3	sct1	SPBC4F6.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.660842239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793064	2541153	2540481	277668	277009	SPBC725.16	SPBC2D10.12	res1	rhp23	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.281649421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793065	2541153	2541869	277668	278359	SPBC725.16	SPAC22F3.13	res1	tsc1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.27748868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793066	2541153	2541334	277668	277845	SPBC725.16	SPBP4H10.18c	res1	SPBP4H10.18c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.26227507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793067	2541153	2541050	277668	277565	SPBC725.16	SPBC428.05c	res1	arg12	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.419408213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793068	2541153	2539588	277668	276146	SPBC725.16	SPCC962.04	res1	rps1201	sct1	rps12|rps12-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.043858457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793069	2541153	2539085	277668	275657	SPBC725.16	SPCC285.15c	res1	rps2802	sct1	rps28|rps28-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775763033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793070	2541153	2541491	277668	277993	SPBC725.16	SPAC2C4.16c	res1	rps801	sct1	rps8|rps8-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.025325571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793071	2541153	2543372	277668	279794	SPBC725.16	SPAPB1A10.09	res1	ase1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.569700479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793072	2541153	2539976	277668	276520	SPBC725.16	SPBC1683.07	res1	mal1	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983452358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793073	2541153	2540167	277668	276702	SPBC725.16	SPBC1683.04	res1	SPBC1683.04	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.819238814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793074	2541153	2541320	277668	277832	SPBC725.16	SPBC1271.03c	res1	SPBC1271.03c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.980050949	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793075	2541153	2540372	277668	276901	SPBC725.16	SPBC31F10.03	res1	SPBC31F10.03	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.264182831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793076	2541153	2542460	277668	278921	SPBC725.16	SPAC1F12.03c	res1	SPAC1F12.03c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.629234836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793077	2541153	2543624	277668	280038	SPBC725.16	SPAC4D7.06c	res1	SPAC4D7.06c	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.331787567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793078	2541153	2542087	277668	278564	SPBC725.16	SPAC26F1.02	res1	pnn1	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820504698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793079	2541153	2542073	277668	278550	SPBC725.16	SPAC26F1.01	res1	sec74	sct1	SPAPJ691.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.565357158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793080	2541153	2540938	277668	277454	SPBC725.16	SPBC365.14c	res1	uge1	sct1	gal10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.064826539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793081	2541153	2542561	277668	279017	SPBC725.16	SPAC31G5.17c	res1	rps1001	sct1	rps10-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.762185085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793082	2541153	2542094	277668	278571	SPBC725.16	SPAC29B12.06c	res1	rcd1	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.567782699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793083	2541153	3361512	277668	280588	SPBC725.16	SPAC3C7.01c	res1	sac12	sct1	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04690913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793084	2541153	2541236	277668	277750	SPBC725.16	SPBC887.11	res1	pus2	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.980396193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793085	2541153	2543365	277668	279787	SPBC725.16	SPAC664.13	res1	SPAC664.13	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.049096819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793086	2541153	2540811	277668	277330	SPBC725.16	SPBC19C7.05	res1	SPBC19C7.05	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.073641613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793087	2541153	2540787	277668	277306	SPBC725.16	SPBC1921.07c	res1	sgf29	sct1	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.140533285	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793088	2541153	2542836	277668	279282	SPBC725.16	SPAC13G7.06	res1	met16	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447613636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793089	2541153	2542879	277668	279324	SPBC725.16	SPAC13G7.07	res1	arb2	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.847466735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793090	2541153	2541260	277668	277774	SPBC725.16	SPBC902.05c	res1	idh2	sct1	glu2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.968986137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793091	2541153	2542578	277668	279034	SPBC725.16	SPAC18B11.09c	res1	SPAC18B11.09c	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153157523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793092	2541153	2543024	277668	279460	SPBC725.16	SPAC1039.02	res1	SPAC1039.02	sct1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.251674164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793093	2541153	2540649	277668	277174	SPBC725.16	SPBC19F8.08	res1	rps401	sct1	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.187268968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793094	2541153	2538730	277668	275314	SPBC725.16	SPCC31H12.02c	res1	mug73	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.826201283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793095	2541153	2539292	277668	275860	SPBC725.16	SPCC4G3.02	res1	aph1	sct1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.269125851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793096	2540560	2540664	277087	277189	SPBC2D10.14c	SPBC215.02	myo51	bob1	-	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.473990542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793097	2540560	2542677	277087	279130	SPBC2D10.14c	SPAC26F1.10c	myo51	pyp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.842452452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793098	2540560	2541346	277087	277857	SPBC2D10.14c	SPBP8B7.08c	myo51	ppm1	-	SPBP8B7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.968090341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793099	2540560	2543685	277087	280099	SPBC2D10.14c	SPAC3C7.03c	myo51	rad55	-	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780205149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793100	2540560	2540415	277087	276943	SPBC2D10.14c	SPBC30B4.06c	myo51	SPBC30B4.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441275125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793101	2540560	2541889	277087	278379	SPBC2D10.14c	SPAC2F7.03c	myo51	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.047456215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793102	2540560	2542740	277087	279190	SPBC2D10.14c	SPAC9G1.06c	myo51	cyk3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508549614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793103	2540560	2541395	277087	277904	SPBC2D10.14c	SPBP8B7.25	myo51	cyp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.672253812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793104	2540560	2543071	277087	279504	SPBC2D10.14c	SPAC3C7.06c	myo51	pit1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.124463734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793105	2540560	2539205	277087	275775	SPBC2D10.14c	SPCC4B3.15	myo51	mid1	-	dmf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.113793505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793106	2540560	2543372	277087	279794	SPBC2D10.14c	SPAPB1A10.09	myo51	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.600513163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793107	2540560	2539033	277087	275606	SPBC2D10.14c	SPCC1450.07c	myo51	dao1	-	SPCC1450.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.877278918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793108	2542925	2541208	279366	277722	SPAC11E3.04c	SPBC887.04c	ubc13	lub1	spu13|sst5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.308611683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793109	2542925	2542022	279366	278505	SPAC11E3.04c	SPAC23A1.03	ubc13	apt1	spu13|sst5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.994189298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793110	2542925	2542318	279366	278784	SPAC11E3.04c	SPAC16C9.05	ubc13	cph1	spu13|sst5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.029918195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793111	2542925	2543685	279366	280099	SPAC11E3.04c	SPAC3C7.03c	ubc13	rad55	spu13|sst5	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.079321747	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793112	2542925	2540825	279366	277343	SPAC11E3.04c	SPBC428.08c	ubc13	clr4	spu13|sst5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.840694153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793113	2542925	2542036	279366	278518	SPAC11E3.04c	SPAC23A1.19c	ubc13	hrq1	spu13|sst5	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.638002859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793114	2542925	2540348	279366	276877	SPAC11E3.04c	SPBC29A10.05	ubc13	exo1	spu13|sst5	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.979195603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793115	2542925	2542007	279366	278490	SPAC11E3.04c	SPAC20H4.07	ubc13	rad57	spu13|sst5	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.466201838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793116	2542925	2543193	279366	279622	SPAC11E3.04c	SPAC3F10.11c	ubc13	abc2	spu13|sst5	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.063205538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793117	2542925	2540531	279366	277059	SPAC11E3.04c	SPBC23E6.08	ubc13	sat1	spu13|sst5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.780834342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793118	2542925	2539205	279366	275775	SPAC11E3.04c	SPCC4B3.15	ubc13	mid1	spu13|sst5	dmf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.853430464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793119	2542925	2538792	279366	275373	SPAC11E3.04c	SPCP1E11.10	ubc13	SPCP1E11.10	spu13|sst5	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.582536984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793120	2543117	2539949	279549	276493	SPAC806.08c	SPBC1703.04	mod21	mlh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.352765298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793121	2543117	2542237	279549	278709	SPAC806.08c	SPAC19E9.02	mod21	fin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.477050126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793122	2543117	2541013	279549	277528	SPAC806.08c	SPBC3H7.13	mod21	far10	-	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.395632918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793123	2543117	2541019	279549	277534	SPAC806.08c	SPBC3B8.07c	mod21	dsd1	-	SDCB3B8.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510390762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793124	2543117	2540919	279549	277435	SPAC806.08c	SPBC543.07	mod21	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.397799439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793125	2543117	2540425	279549	276953	SPAC806.08c	SPBC27.06c	mod21	mgr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.334569854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793126	2543117	2542177	279549	278652	SPAC806.08c	SPAC17H9.08	mod21	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.103332909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793127	2543117	2541545	279549	278045	SPAC806.08c	SPAC22F8.07c	mod21	rtf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933102209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793128	2543117	2541614	279549	278111	SPAC806.08c	SPAC29A4.20	mod21	elp3	-	kat9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868028401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793129	2543117	2543304	279549	279728	SPAC806.08c	SPAC6B12.12	mod21	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.950807609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793130	2543117	2542418	279549	278881	SPAC806.08c	SPAC1805.07c	mod21	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.4817505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793131	2543117	2541404	279549	277913	SPAC806.08c	SPBPB2B2.18	mod21	SPBPB2B2.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.06110788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793132	2541926	2542207	278414	278682	SPAC222.14c	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC222.14c	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.466937954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793133	2541926	2539050	278414	275623	SPAC222.14c	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC222.14c	rik1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.083079767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793134	2541926	2539841	278414	276389	SPAC222.14c	SPBC17D1.05	SPAC222.14c	SPBC17D1.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.333836589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793135	2541926	2540913	278414	277429	SPAC222.14c	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC222.14c	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.388943972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793136	2541926	2542378	278414	278842	SPAC222.14c	SPAC1805.04	SPAC222.14c	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.622265848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793137	2541926	2540686	278414	277211	SPAC222.14c	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC222.14c	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.103293083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793138	2541926	2540664	278414	277189	SPAC222.14c	SPBC215.02	SPAC222.14c	bob1	-	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.171529141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793139	2541926	2542277	278414	278746	SPAC222.14c	SPAC17A5.02c	SPAC222.14c	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.813321433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793140	2541926	2539352	278414	275918	SPAC222.14c	SPCC188.07	SPAC222.14c	ccq1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.885742549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793141	2541926	2542253	278414	278723	SPAC222.14c	SPAC17H9.04c	SPAC222.14c	SPAC17H9.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.97520884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793142	2541926	2540352	278414	276881	SPAC222.14c	SPBC215.03c	SPAC222.14c	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.901268712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793143	2541926	2540673	278414	277198	SPAC222.14c	SPBC1D7.03	SPAC222.14c	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.716855746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793144	2541926	2541496	278414	277998	SPAC222.14c	SPAC23D3.09	SPAC222.14c	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.960803087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793145	2541926	2539667	278414	276222	SPAC222.14c	SPBC13G1.08c	SPAC222.14c	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.287599211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793146	2541926	2542126	278414	278602	SPAC222.14c	SPAC1B3.05	SPAC222.14c	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.27048389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793147	2541926	3361470	278414	280546	SPAC222.14c	SPAC3G9.01	SPAC222.14c	nsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.79241419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793148	2541926	2539812	278414	276362	SPAC222.14c	SPBC1347.02	SPAC222.14c	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.491823887	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793149	2541926	2543139	278414	279571	SPAC222.14c	SPAC12G12.03	SPAC222.14c	cip2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.603290205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793150	2541926	2541175	278414	277689	SPAC222.14c	SPBC839.13c	SPAC222.14c	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.682018762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793151	2541926	2540998	278414	277514	SPAC222.14c	SPBC3D6.05	SPAC222.14c	ptp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.587252216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793152	2541926	2540464	278414	276992	SPAC222.14c	SPBC23E6.02	SPAC222.14c	rrp2	-	SPBC23E6.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.498771796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793153	2541926	2541531	278414	278031	SPAC222.14c	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC222.14c	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.093809288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793154	2541926	2540829	278414	277347	SPAC222.14c	SPBC800.09	SPAC222.14c	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.1590038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793155	2541926	2540677	278414	277202	SPAC222.14c	SPBC21B10.03c	SPAC222.14c	ath1	-	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.611296215	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793156	2541926	2540936	278414	277452	SPAC222.14c	SPBC800.05c	SPAC222.14c	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.094513583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793157	2541926	2543387	278414	279809	SPAC222.14c	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC222.14c	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.775045081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793158	2541926	2543372	278414	279794	SPAC222.14c	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAC222.14c	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.784254536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793159	2540045	2541801	276583	278292	SPBC119.13c	SPAC2F7.08c	prp31	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640348351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793160	2540045	2543628	276583	280042	SPBC119.13c	SPAC3H8.10	prp31	spo20	-	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.782472573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793161	2539642	2542372	276197	278836	SPBC1706.01	SPAC1F3.03	tea4	SPAC1F3.03	wsh3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318657242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793162	2539642	2540131	276197	276668	SPBC1706.01	SPBC1778.05c	tea4	SPBC1778.05c	wsh3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323647207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793163	2539642	2538993	276197	275567	SPBC1706.01	SPCC162.12	tea4	tco89	wsh3	SPCC1753.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32475658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793164	2539642	2543434	276197	279854	SPBC1706.01	SPAC8F11.02c	tea4	dph3	wsh3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.546246189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793165	2539642	2540979	276197	277495	SPBC1706.01	SPBC3H7.10	tea4	elp6	wsh3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.293677325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793166	2539642	2543681	276197	280095	SPBC1706.01	SPAC9.02c	tea4	SPAC9.02c	wsh3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516491256	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793167	2539642	2541323	276197	277835	SPBC1706.01	SPBP35G2.14	tea4	SPBP35G2.14	wsh3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32045161	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793168	2539642	2541021	276197	277536	SPBC1706.01	SPBC3B8.10c	tea4	nem1	wsh3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321262704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793169	2539642	2539467	276197	276030	SPBC1706.01	SPCC417.07c	tea4	mto1	wsh3	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.14761408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793170	2539642	2539388	276197	275953	SPBC1706.01	SPCC24B10.12	tea4	cgi121	wsh3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638330444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793171	2539642	2541938	276197	278425	SPBC1706.01	SPAC8C9.16c	tea4	mug63	wsh3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571488906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793172	2539642	2542707	276197	279160	SPBC1706.01	SPAC25G10.03	tea4	zip1	wsh3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378469715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793173	2539642	2539371	276197	275937	SPBC1706.01	SPCC18B5.06	tea4	dom34	wsh3	SPCC18B5.06|erf1|sup45	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86403689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793174	2539642	2540086	276197	276624	SPBC1706.01	SPBC16H5.12c	tea4	SPBC16H5.12c	wsh3	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.381187295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793175	2539642	2539974	276197	276518	SPBC1706.01	SPBC32H8.07	tea4	git5	wsh3	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776831563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793176	2539642	2540836	276197	277354	SPBC1706.01	SPBC18H10.19	tea4	vps38	wsh3	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707665536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793177	2539642	2542549	276197	279006	SPBC1706.01	SPAC19A8.11c	tea4	SPAC19A8.11c	wsh3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.46485827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793178	2539642	2542170	276197	278645	SPBC1706.01	SPAC17G8.13c	tea4	mst2	wsh3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450272039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793179	2539642	2540619	276197	277145	SPBC1706.01	SPBC25H2.15	tea4	SPBC25H2.15	wsh3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.276861675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793180	2539642	2541909	276197	278399	SPBC1706.01	SPAC227.01c	tea4	erd1	wsh3	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.34775016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793181	2539642	2540800	276197	277319	SPBC1706.01	SPBC409.20c	tea4	psh3	wsh3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.412646683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793182	2539642	2541432	276197	277937	SPBC1706.01	SPAC1F5.05c	tea4	mso1	wsh3	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.571731783	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793183	2539642	2543192	276197	279621	SPBC1706.01	SPAC343.18	tea4	rfp2	wsh3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041859695	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793184	2539642	2540896	276197	277412	SPBC1706.01	SPBC19C2.13c	tea4	ctu2	wsh3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.274622298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793185	2539642	2540314	276197	276844	SPBC1706.01	SPBC2G5.03	tea4	ctu1	wsh3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.406854094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793186	2539642	2541576	276197	278073	SPBC1706.01	SPBC1348.02	tea4	SPBC1348.02	wsh3	SPAC1348.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330587951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793187	2539642	2538730	276197	275314	SPBC1706.01	SPCC31H12.02c	tea4	mug73	wsh3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.07719403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793188	2543358	2539564	279780	276125	SPAC688.10	SPCC550.12	rev3	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044167264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793189	2543358	2542555	279780	279012	SPAC688.10	SPAC1952.06c	rev3	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.302824196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793190	2543358	2543685	279780	280099	SPAC688.10	SPAC3C7.03c	rev3	rad55	-	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.711793703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793191	2543358	2541801	279780	278292	SPAC688.10	SPAC2F7.08c	rev3	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.046125282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793192	2543358	2542007	279780	278490	SPAC688.10	SPAC20H4.07	rev3	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.213198474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793193	2543358	2541531	279780	278031	SPAC688.10	SPAC25A8.01c	rev3	fft3	-	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043430812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793194	2542582	2542207	279037	278682	SPAC19G12.02c	SPAC17H9.10c	pms1	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32835576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793195	2542582	2539244	279037	275814	SPAC19G12.02c	SPCC1672.06c	pms1	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.990903399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793196	2542582	2539023	279037	275596	SPAC19G12.02c	SPCC594.05c	pms1	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.125883075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793197	2542582	2542976	279037	279414	SPAC19G12.02c	SPAC9E9.09c	pms1	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445021682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793198	2542582	2542597	279037	279051	SPAC19G12.02c	SPAP8A3.07c	pms1	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515867241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793199	2542582	2541628	279037	278124	SPAC19G12.02c	SPAC110.02	pms1	pds5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44447578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793200	2542582	2542250	279037	278720	SPAC19G12.02c	SPAC17D4.03c	pms1	cis4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.774949649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793201	2542582	2543387	279037	279809	SPAC19G12.02c	SPAPB1E7.02c	pms1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639250946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793202	2542582	2543472	279037	279892	SPAC19G12.02c	SPAC959.04c	pms1	omh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.39184387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793203	2543346	2542237	279768	278709	SPAC688.14	SPAC19E9.02	set13	fin1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.990529195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793204	2543346	2542549	279768	279006	SPAC688.14	SPAC19A8.11c	set13	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450194365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793205	2543346	2541773	279768	278267	SPAC688.14	SPAC23H4.02	set13	ppk9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.846890151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793206	2540705	2540415	277228	276943	SPBC20F10.01	SPBC30B4.06c	gar1	SPBC30B4.06c	SPBC25H2.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.431253792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793207	2540705	2541488	277228	277990	SPBC20F10.01	SPAC227.17c	gar1	SPAC227.17c	SPBC25H2.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.12533668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793208	2540705	2543387	277228	279809	SPBC20F10.01	SPAPB1E7.02c	gar1	mcl1	SPBC25H2.01c	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.746865923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793209	2542094	2542072	278571	278549	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAP32A8.03c	rcd1	bop1	-	SPAP32A8.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.818203425	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793210	2542094	2540105	278571	276642	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC106.04	rcd1	ada1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.558313485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793211	2542094	2542723	278571	279174	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC25H1.03	rcd1	atg101	-	mug66	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873178419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793212	2542094	2540913	278571	277429	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC56F2.08c	rcd1	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.137893851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793213	2542094	2541913	278571	278403	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC227.04	rcd1	atg10	-	SPAC227.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092299278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793214	2542094	2538977	278571	275551	SPAC29B12.06c	SPCC1020.06c	rcd1	tal1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147665653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793215	2542094	2541818	278571	278309	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC11G7.02	rcd1	pub1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.155214016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793216	2542094	2540653	278571	277178	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC215.07c	rcd1	SPBC215.07c	-	pdp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.247085669	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793217	2542094	2542643	278571	279097	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC2C4.07c	rcd1	dis32	-	SPAC2C4.07c|dis3L2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867688192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793218	2542094	2539301	278571	275869	SPAC29B12.06c	SPCC622.03c	rcd1	SPCC622.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.873644388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793219	2542094	2538985	278571	275559	SPAC29B12.06c	SPCC13B11.03c	rcd1	SPCC13B11.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926583409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793220	2542094	2543339	278571	279762	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC630.13c	rcd1	tsc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98584521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793221	2542094	2543578	278571	279993	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC9.10	rcd1	thi9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.131824942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793222	2542094	2539930	278571	276474	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC1198.11c	rcd1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.712520186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793223	2542094	2541117	278571	277632	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC646.13	rcd1	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.442924395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793224	2542094	2541066	278571	277581	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC543.02c	rcd1	SPBC543.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451854283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793225	2542094	2540686	278571	277211	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC21D10.10	rcd1	bdc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039028264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793226	2542094	2539028	278571	275601	SPAC29B12.06c	SPCC1281.07c	rcd1	SPCC1281.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.76778876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793227	2542094	3361375	278571	280451	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC212.06c	rcd1	SPAC212.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817141433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793228	2542094	2542107	278571	278583	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC30.01c	rcd1	sec72	-	sec7b|sec702	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322751188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793229	2542094	2543590	278571	280005	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC4C5.03	rcd1	SPAC4C5.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.211704571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793230	2542094	2539937	278571	276481	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC1539.08	rcd1	arf6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.410571591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793231	2542094	2541346	278571	277857	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBP8B7.08c	rcd1	ppm1	-	SPBP8B7.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.894082608	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793232	2542094	2541530	278571	278030	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC57A10.10c	rcd1	sla1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991274716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793233	2542094	2541227	278571	277741	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC947.05c	rcd1	frp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.440681117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793234	2542094	2541323	278571	277835	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBP35G2.14	rcd1	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923191691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793235	2542094	2542135	278571	278611	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC13A11.04c	rcd1	ubp8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930981642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793236	2542094	2542277	278571	278746	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC17A5.02c	rcd1	dbr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.714295526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793237	2542094	2543685	278571	280099	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC3C7.03c	rcd1	rad55	-	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572446928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793238	2542094	2543543	278571	279960	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAPB24D3.06c	rcd1	SPAPB24D3.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.75496816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793239	2542094	2543292	278571	279717	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC6C3.02c	rcd1	SPAC6C3.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.908690676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793240	2542094	2540714	278571	277237	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC19C2.04c	rcd1	ubp11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.262917051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793241	2542094	2541335	278571	277846	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBP4G3.03	rcd1	SPBP4G3.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.376953247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793242	2542094	2542036	278571	278518	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC23A1.19c	rcd1	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.101942555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793243	2542094	2538821	278571	275402	SPAC29B12.06c	SPCC584.01c	rcd1	SPCC584.01c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870115934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793244	2542094	2541237	278571	277751	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC947.04	rcd1	pfl3	-	SPBC947.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816710094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793245	2542094	2541264	278571	277778	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC902.06	rcd1	mto2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.990584114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793246	2542094	2540041	278571	276580	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC1198.03c	rcd1	SPBC1198.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098934624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793247	2542094	2540348	278571	276877	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC29A10.05	rcd1	exo1	-	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.875586136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793248	2542094	2539073	278571	275645	SPAC29B12.06c	SPCC1322.02	rcd1	pxd1	-	SPCC1322.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.852183133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793249	2542094	2543363	278571	279785	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAPB24D3.09c	rcd1	pdr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.702958516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793250	2542094	2539624	278571	276181	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC1289.16c	rcd1	cao2	-	SPBC8E4.06|spao2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.933433897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793251	2542094	2541187	278571	277701	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC776.14	rcd1	plh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387672254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793252	2542094	2542861	278571	279307	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC13G7.13c	rcd1	msa1	-	SPAC6C3.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.24952972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793253	2542094	2541828	278571	278319	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC22H12.05c	rcd1	fsc1	-	SPAC22H12.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.044996674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793254	2542094	2541900	278571	278390	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC23H4.17c	rcd1	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.863473998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793255	2542094	2543311	278571	279735	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC977.15	rcd1	SPAC977.15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.27242926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793256	2542094	2540318	278571	276848	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC30B4.04c	rcd1	sol1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.76755045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793257	2542094	2542549	278571	279006	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC19A8.11c	rcd1	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145671621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793258	2542094	2542055	278571	278534	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC6G9.03c	rcd1	mug183	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.840294455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793259	2542094	2543119	278571	279551	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC3A11.07	rcd1	nde2	-	SPAC3A11.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.463934423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793260	2542094	2539936	278571	276480	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC1685.05	rcd1	SPBC1685.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462419814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793261	2542094	2540201	278571	276734	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC13A2.04c	rcd1	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454121478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793262	2542094	2540967	278571	277483	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC36B7.08c	rcd1	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319236049	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793263	2542094	2538828	278571	275409	SPAC29B12.06c	SPCC1020.05	rcd1	SPCC1020.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.351884245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793264	2542094	2543049	278571	279484	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC1296.04	rcd1	mug65	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814210878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793265	2542094	2539964	278571	276508	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC1773.03c	rcd1	SPBC1773.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.440535686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793266	2542094	2541762	278571	278256	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC139.01c	rcd1	SPAC139.01c	-	SPAC955.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.627179771	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793267	2542094	2541525	278571	278025	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC27D7.02c	rcd1	SPAC27D7.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092668233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793268	2542094	2541670	278571	278166	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC24H6.13	rcd1	SPAC24H6.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036667563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793269	2542094	2540916	278571	277432	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC354.15	rcd1	fap1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985923363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793270	2542094	2539499	278571	276062	SPAC29B12.06c	SPCC622.08c	rcd1	hta1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.613271305	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793271	2542094	2539082	278571	275654	SPAC29B12.06c	SPCC126.03	rcd1	pus1	-	lps1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.848430743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793272	2542094	2538844	278571	275425	SPAC29B12.06c	SPCC1183.09c	rcd1	pmp31	-	mug75	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037837313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793273	2542094	2542881	278571	279326	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC13F5.03c	rcd1	gld1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.771621934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793274	2542094	2541121	278571	277636	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC609.03	rcd1	iqw1	-	iqwd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.01181809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793275	2542094	2543304	278571	279728	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC6B12.12	rcd1	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.70818467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793276	2542094	2541376	278571	277887	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBP8B7.04	rcd1	mug45	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.878778316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793277	2542094	2540725	278571	277248	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC215.14c	rcd1	vps20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.203685605	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793278	2542094	2541531	278571	278031	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC25A8.01c	rcd1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153311729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793279	2542094	2540891	278571	277407	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC582.08	rcd1	SPBC582.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.319291812	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793280	2542094	2542222	278571	278695	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC31G5.18c	rcd1	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.821002303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793281	2542094	2540516	278571	277044	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC21C3.01c	rcd1	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876808779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793282	2542094	2542838	278571	279284	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC13G7.11	rcd1	SPAC13G7.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.405915947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793283	2542094	2539205	278571	275775	SPAC29B12.06c	SPCC4B3.15	rcd1	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.528263648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793284	2542094	2539375	278571	275941	SPAC29B12.06c	SPCC4G3.11	rcd1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.247529013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793285	2542094	2540146	278571	276683	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC17A3.06	rcd1	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.346287686	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793286	2542094	2542021	278571	278504	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAP14E8.02	rcd1	tos4	-	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.462769222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793287	2542094	2541657	278571	278153	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAP27G11.15	rcd1	slx1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.103237026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793288	2542094	2541806	278571	278297	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC4G8.13c	rcd1	prz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046413944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793289	2542094	2543277	278571	279705	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC1002.03c	rcd1	gls2	-	gls2alpha	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09762883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793290	2542094	2541375	278571	277886	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBP8B7.31	rcd1	SPBP8B7.31	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038178329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793291	2542094	2540093	278571	276631	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC115.02c	rcd1	afg1	-	SPBC115.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.698364496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793292	2542094	2543372	278571	279794	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAPB1A10.09	rcd1	ase1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.14516649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793293	2542094	2542111	278571	278587	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC1687.14c	rcd1	SPAC1687.14c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.0398262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793294	2542094	2542943	278571	279384	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC1348.03	rcd1	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.009633849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793295	2542094	3361512	278571	280588	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC3C7.01c	rcd1	sac12	-	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035023507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793296	2542094	2539708	278571	276261	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC1861.06c	rcd1	mug131	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77282826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793297	2542094	2543660	278571	280074	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAPB1E7.08c	rcd1	SPAPB1E7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.263926596	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793298	5802732	2538939	857870	275514	SPBC1348.10c	SPCC1672.04c	SPBC1348.10c	SPCC1672.04c	SPAC1348.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.263301409	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793299	5802732	2541570	857870	278067	SPBC1348.10c	SPAC6G9.09c	SPBC1348.10c	rpl2401	SPAC1348.10c	rpl24|rpl24-01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.453823284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793300	5802732	2543559	857870	279975	SPBC1348.10c	SPAC664.04c	SPBC1348.10c	rps1602	SPAC1348.10c	rps16|rps16-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.954299416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793301	5802732	2542392	857870	278856	SPBC1348.10c	SPAC19D5.02c	SPBC1348.10c	SPAC19D5.02c	SPAC1348.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.843544109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793302	5802732	2540717	857870	277240	SPBC1348.10c	SPBC577.12	SPBC1348.10c	dph6	SPAC1348.10c	mug71	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.262030478	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793303	5802732	2538806	857870	275387	SPBC1348.10c	SPCC1840.09	SPBC1348.10c	SPCC1840.09	SPAC1348.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.699569072	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793304	5802732	2543584	857870	279999	SPBC1348.10c	SPAPB1E7.11c	SPBC1348.10c	SPAPB1E7.11c	SPAC1348.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.680807485	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793305	5802732	2541014	857870	277529	SPBC1348.10c	SPBC3D6.06c	SPBC1348.10c	prs5	SPAC1348.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.838955592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793306	5802732	2539467	857870	276030	SPBC1348.10c	SPCC417.07c	SPBC1348.10c	mto1	SPAC1348.10c	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.408343661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793307	5802732	2543537	857870	279954	SPBC1348.10c	SPAC4D7.05	SPBC1348.10c	sum1	SPAC1348.10c	tif34	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049020858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793308	5802732	2540348	857870	276877	SPBC1348.10c	SPBC29A10.05	SPBC1348.10c	exo1	SPAC1348.10c	mut2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512629142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793309	5802732	2540396	857870	276924	SPBC1348.10c	SPBC31F10.12	SPBC1348.10c	tma20	SPAC1348.10c	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.84190675	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793310	5802732	2541192	857870	277706	SPBC1348.10c	SPBC83.17	SPBC1348.10c	SPBC83.17	SPAC1348.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.186771192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793311	5802732	2543208	857870	279637	SPBC1348.10c	SPAC328.04	SPBC1348.10c	SPAC328.04	SPAC1348.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.13445892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793312	5802732	2538994	857870	275568	SPBC1348.10c	SPCC553.01c	SPBC1348.10c	dbl2	SPAC1348.10c	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.461646955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793313	5802732	2540326	857870	276856	SPBC1348.10c	SPBC2G5.06c	SPBC1348.10c	hmt2	SPAC1348.10c	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.682382546	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793314	5802732	2539850	857870	276398	SPBC1348.10c	SPBC15D4.07c	SPBC1348.10c	atg9	SPAC1348.10c	apg9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328430501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793315	5802732	2542010	857870	278493	SPBC1348.10c	SPAC20H4.05c	SPBC1348.10c	SPAC20H4.05c	SPAC1348.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329715968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793316	5802732	2541708	857870	278203	SPBC1348.10c	SPAC31A2.02	SPBC1348.10c	trm112	SPAC1348.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.766913168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793317	5802732	2539043	857870	275616	SPBC1348.10c	SPCC1235.08c	SPBC1348.10c	pdh1	SPAC1348.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194239357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793318	5802732	2540599	857870	277125	SPBC1348.10c	SPBC29A3.10c	SPBC1348.10c	atp14	SPAC1348.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.191458964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793319	5802732	2540946	857870	277462	SPBC1348.10c	SPBC36.04	SPBC1348.10c	cys11	SPAC1348.10c	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.974930521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793320	5802732	2541156	857870	277671	SPBC1348.10c	SPBC685.07c	SPBC1348.10c	rpl2701	SPAC1348.10c	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643507166	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793321	5802732	2540619	857870	277145	SPBC1348.10c	SPBC25H2.15	SPBC1348.10c	SPBC25H2.15	SPAC1348.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.626298481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793322	5802732	2542881	857870	279326	SPBC1348.10c	SPAC13F5.03c	SPBC1348.10c	gld1	SPAC1348.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.281725666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793323	5802732	2542515	857870	278973	SPBC1348.10c	SPAC1952.09c	SPBC1348.10c	SPAC1952.09c	SPAC1348.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.813125978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793324	5802732	2543304	857870	279728	SPBC1348.10c	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC1348.10c	tom70	SPAC1348.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634504083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793325	5802732	2540881	857870	277398	SPBC1348.10c	SPBC577.14c	SPBC1348.10c	spa1	SPAC1348.10c	spa	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.933742749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793326	5802732	2542940	857870	279381	SPBC1348.10c	SPAC31A2.12	SPBC1348.10c	SPAC31A2.12	SPAC1348.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.841943974	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793327	5802732	2543096	857870	279528	SPBC1348.10c	SPAC977.05c	SPBC1348.10c	SPAC977.05c	SPAC1348.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.438336638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793328	5802732	2538962	857870	275536	SPBC1348.10c	SPCC965.13	SPBC1348.10c	SPCC965.13	SPAC1348.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.384339651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793329	5802732	2540089	857870	276627	SPBC1348.10c	SPBC32H8.01c	SPBC1348.10c	SPBC32H8.01c	SPAC1348.10c	SPBP22H7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.386536776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793330	5802732	2538756	857870	275339	SPBC1348.10c	SPCC1795.10c	SPBC1348.10c	SPCC1795.10c	SPAC1348.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776725884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793331	5802732	2540677	857870	277202	SPBC1348.10c	SPBC21B10.03c	SPBC1348.10c	ath1	SPAC1348.10c	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.748756244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793332	5802732	2539736	857870	276288	SPBC1348.10c	SPBC12C2.12c	SPBC1348.10c	glo1	SPAC1348.10c	SPBC21D10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.774871271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793333	5802732	2541528	857870	278028	SPBC1348.10c	SPAC24B11.14	SPBC1348.10c	SPAC24B11.14	SPAC1348.10c	SPAC806.10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509634136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793334	5802732	2543446	857870	279866	SPBC1348.10c	SPAC4F8.10c	SPBC1348.10c	stg1	SPAC1348.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.679442851	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793335	5802732	2542109	857870	278585	SPBC1348.10c	SPAC1687.16c	SPBC1348.10c	erg31	SPAC1348.10c	erg3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778448942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793336	5802732	2541646	857870	278142	SPBC1348.10c	SPAC750.06c	SPBC1348.10c	SPAC750.06c	SPAC1348.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.379403406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793337	5802732	2541478	857870	277980	SPBC1348.10c	SPAC2F7.17	SPBC1348.10c	mrf1	SPAC1348.10c	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.976093228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793338	5802732	2541875	857870	278365	SPBC1348.10c	SPAC22F3.06c	SPBC1348.10c	lon1	SPAC1348.10c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382621945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793339	5802732	2538730	857870	275314	SPBC1348.10c	SPCC31H12.02c	SPBC1348.10c	mug73	SPAC1348.10c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.774810989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793340	2541319	2542598	277831	279052	SPBP4H10.06c	SPAC6G10.08	cut14	idp1	smc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093665744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793341	2541319	2542758	277831	279208	SPBP4H10.06c	SPAC15E1.02c	cut14	SPAC15E1.02c	smc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820167213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793342	2541319	3361436	277831	280512	SPBP4H10.06c	SPAC1296.01c	cut14	SPAC1296.01c	smc2	SPAC22F3.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.093151375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793343	2541319	2540999	277831	277515	SPBP4H10.06c	SPBC4B4.04	cut14	SPBC4B4.04	smc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.773633152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793344	2541319	2543681	277831	280095	SPBP4H10.06c	SPAC9.02c	cut14	SPAC9.02c	smc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816531803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793345	2541319	2541119	277831	277634	SPBP4H10.06c	SPBC651.11c	cut14	apm3	smc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870760613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793346	2541319	2542189	277831	278664	SPBP4H10.06c	SPAC17A5.09c	cut14	glc9	smc2	SPAC17A5.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.261812353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793347	2541319	2540825	277831	277343	SPBP4H10.06c	SPBC428.08c	cut14	clr4	smc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636350372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793348	2541319	2542921	277831	279362	SPBP4H10.06c	SPAC1093.01	cut14	ppr5	smc2	SPAC12B10.18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926214673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793349	2541319	2541496	277831	277998	SPBP4H10.06c	SPAC23D3.09	cut14	arp42	smc2	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.503216198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793350	2541319	2543117	277831	279549	SPBP4H10.06c	SPAC806.08c	cut14	mod21	smc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.055278505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793351	2541319	2539857	277831	276404	SPBP4H10.06c	SPBC1604.20c	cut14	tea2	smc2	klp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.330430237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793352	2541319	2539667	277831	276222	SPBP4H10.06c	SPBC13G1.08c	cut14	ash2	smc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510855393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793353	2541319	2543254	277831	279682	SPBP4H10.06c	SPAC1006.03c	cut14	red1	smc2	iss3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322460864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793354	2541319	2542458	277831	278919	SPBP4H10.06c	SPAC30.02c	cut14	SPAC30.02c	smc2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867915381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793355	2541319	2541367	277831	277878	SPBP4H10.06c	SPBP8B7.13	cut14	vac7	smc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.812234152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793356	2541319	2540064	277831	276602	SPBP4H10.06c	SPBC1718.02	cut14	hop1	smc2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778089412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793357	2539857	2542585	276404	279040	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC31A2.13c	tea2	sft1	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.200066439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793358	2539857	2543064	276404	279497	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC3G6.01	tea2	hrp3	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.892453611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793359	2539857	2540161	276404	276696	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC13E7.03c	tea2	SPBC13E7.03c	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.60297062	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793360	2539857	2541345	276404	277856	SPBC1604.20c	SPBP35G2.07	tea2	ilv1	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.907029112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793361	2539857	2540686	276404	277211	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC21D10.10	tea2	bdc1	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.128938447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793362	2539857	2542103	276404	278579	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC31G5.11	tea2	pac2	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388793909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793363	2539857	2540999	276404	277515	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC4B4.04	tea2	SPBC4B4.04	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707613803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793364	2539857	2541200	276404	277714	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC8D2.03c	tea2	hhf2	klp4	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390369769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793365	2539857	2542468	276404	278929	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC1D4.09c	tea2	rtf2	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508241734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793366	2539857	2539510	276404	276072	SPBC1604.20c	SPCC4G3.04c	tea2	coq5	klp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864722926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793367	2539857	2541058	276404	277573	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC3H7.09	tea2	erf2	klp4	mug142	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.200260179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793368	2539857	2543316	276404	279740	SPBC1604.20c	SPAPJ691.02	tea2	SPAPJ691.02	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439941566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793369	2539857	2543681	276404	280095	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC9.02c	tea2	SPAC9.02c	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454687991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793370	2539857	2541026	276404	277541	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC337.09	tea2	erg28	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.128390182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793371	2539857	2541323	276404	277835	SPBC1604.20c	SPBP35G2.14	tea2	SPBP35G2.14	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517613585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793372	2539857	2542277	276404	278746	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC17A5.02c	tea2	dbr1	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.478678206	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793373	2539857	2543584	276404	279999	SPBC1604.20c	SPAPB1E7.11c	tea2	SPAPB1E7.11c	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.44577745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793374	2539857	2538906	276404	275483	SPBC1604.20c	SPCC1259.03	tea2	rpa12	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.736345366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793375	2539857	2542981	276404	279419	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC824.02	tea2	bst1	klp4	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.751835583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793376	2539857	2540825	276404	277343	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC428.08c	tea2	clr4	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.346646499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793377	2539857	2541021	276404	277536	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC3B8.10c	tea2	nem1	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.84752993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793378	2539857	2539023	276404	275596	SPBC1604.20c	SPCC594.05c	tea2	spf1	klp4	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3302694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793379	2539857	2539467	276404	276030	SPBC1604.20c	SPCC417.07c	tea2	mto1	klp4	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.411648556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793380	2539857	2539388	276404	275953	SPBC1604.20c	SPCC24B10.12	tea2	cgi121	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.577441662	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793381	2539857	2540894	276404	277410	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC530.04	tea2	mod5	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05968838	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793382	2539857	2542513	276404	278971	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC1952.05	tea2	gcn5	klp4	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.986966871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793383	2539857	2541776	276404	278270	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC23H3.05c	tea2	swd1	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.78120091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793384	2539857	2541160	276404	277675	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC725.09c	tea2	hob3	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.911182417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793385	2539857	2542123	276404	278599	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC18G6.15	tea2	mal3	klp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.840416875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793386	2539857	2543412	276404	279834	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC637.07	tea2	moe1	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197991758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793387	2539857	2542168	276404	278643	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC17A5.16	tea2	ftp105	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513390934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793388	2539857	2539999	276404	276543	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC1734.15	tea2	rsc4	klp4	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.397065799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793389	2539857	2540326	276404	276856	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC2G5.06c	tea2	hmt2	klp4	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.068652041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793390	2539857	2542710	276404	279163	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC750.08c	tea2	SPAC750.08c	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506245184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793391	2539857	2542976	276404	279414	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC9E9.09c	tea2	atd1	klp4	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.828196181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793392	2539857	2540394	276404	276922	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC2D10.09	tea2	snr1	klp4	SPBC2D10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.341544656	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793393	2539857	2540990	276404	277506	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC36B7.06c	tea2	mug20	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.810663728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793394	2539857	2543517	276404	279935	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC3G9.05	tea2	spa2	klp4	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.902430443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793395	2539857	3361105	276404	280181	SPBC1604.20c	SPCC188.10c	tea2	SPCC188.10c	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.76668107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793396	2539857	2541488	276404	277990	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC227.17c	tea2	SPAC227.17c	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.018830952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793397	2539857	2539519	276404	276081	SPBC1604.20c	SPCC364.05	tea2	vps3	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.214918952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793398	2539857	2539354	276404	275920	SPBC1604.20c	SPCC4F11.03c	tea2	SPCC4F11.03c	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.281742994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793399	2539857	2542759	276404	279209	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC9G1.07	tea2	SPAC9G1.07	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.685446837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793400	2539857	2538762	276404	275345	SPBC1604.20c	SPCC306.04c	tea2	set1	klp4	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.859844012	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793401	2539857	2539555	276404	276116	SPBC1604.20c	SPCC4B3.08	tea2	lsg1	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.313214527	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793402	2539857	2543670	276404	280084	SPBC1604.20c	SPAPB1E7.06c	tea2	eme1	klp4	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.31995116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793403	2539857	2540498	276404	277026	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC27.02c	tea2	ask1	klp4	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.578597804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793404	2539857	2539925	276404	276469	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC16H5.13	tea2	SPBC16H5.13	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.012220674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793405	2539857	2540800	276404	277319	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC409.20c	tea2	psh3	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.111371464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793406	2539857	2543304	276404	279728	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC6B12.12	tea2	tom70	klp4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.076151186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793407	2539857	2540346	276404	276875	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC2F12.03c	tea2	ebs1	klp4	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634619515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793408	2539857	2540829	276404	277347	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC800.09	tea2	sum2	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979480467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793409	2539857	2542418	276404	278881	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC1805.07c	tea2	dad2	klp4	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.663672405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793410	2539857	2540677	276404	277202	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC21B10.03c	tea2	ath1	klp4	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.254348746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793411	2539857	2540936	276404	277452	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC800.05c	tea2	atb2	klp4	alp2|ban5|tub1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932982583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793412	2539857	2543044	276404	279479	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC3C7.12	tea2	tip1	klp4	noc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.20514558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793413	2539857	2541757	276404	278251	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC2F7.10	tea2	akr1	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506293048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793414	2539857	2538840	276404	275421	SPBC1604.20c	SPCC736.07c	tea2	SPCC736.07c	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.079261068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793415	2539857	2542871	276404	279316	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC6F12.10c	tea2	ade3	klp4	min11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568573994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793416	2539857	2543337	276404	279760	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC959.08	tea2	rpl2102	klp4	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573524245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793417	2539857	2543087	276404	279520	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC30C2.04	tea2	SPAC30C2.04	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.557845242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793418	2539857	2542424	276404	278886	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC1805.14	tea2	SPAC1805.14	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323513408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793419	2539857	2540309	276404	276839	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC21B10.13c	tea2	yox1	klp4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.157886149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793420	2539857	2540787	276404	277306	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC1921.07c	tea2	sgf29	klp4	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.47678401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793421	2543160	2543565	279591	279981	SPAC31A2.14	SPAPB24D3.04c	bun107	mag1	wdr48	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813821804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793422	2543160	2538721	279591	275305	SPAC31A2.14	SPCC1494.10	bun107	adn3	wdr48	SPCC70.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.985858779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793423	2543160	2542518	279591	278976	SPAC31A2.14	SPAC1B3.16c	bun107	vht1	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442405205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793424	2543160	2540131	279591	276668	SPAC31A2.14	SPBC1778.05c	bun107	SPBC1778.05c	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.464808127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793425	2543160	2540410	279591	276938	SPAC31A2.14	SPBC2D10.04	bun107	SPBC2D10.04	wdr48	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.021670042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793426	2543160	2541345	279591	277856	SPAC31A2.14	SPBP35G2.07	bun107	ilv1	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575923292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793427	2543160	2538922	279591	275499	SPAC31A2.14	SPCC16C4.10	bun107	SPCC16C4.10	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.875452421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793428	2543160	2541208	279591	277722	SPAC31A2.14	SPBC887.04c	bun107	lub1	wdr48	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.198380467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793429	2543160	2542273	279591	278742	SPAC31A2.14	SPAC17H9.13c	bun107	SPAC17H9.13c	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.756110424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793430	2543160	2539510	279591	276072	SPAC31A2.14	SPCC4G3.04c	bun107	coq5	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.922796845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793431	2543160	2543681	279591	280095	SPAC31A2.14	SPAC9.02c	bun107	SPAC9.02c	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.507407793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793432	2543160	2542689	279591	279142	SPAC31A2.14	SPAC29B12.04	bun107	snz1	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.954360752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793433	2543160	2540919	279591	277435	SPAC31A2.14	SPBC543.07	bun107	pek1	wdr48	mkk1|skh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.866929702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793434	2543160	2539792	279591	276342	SPAC31A2.14	SPBC1271.14	bun107	SPBC1271.14	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440489379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793435	2543160	2543641	279591	280055	SPAC31A2.14	SPAC3H5.08c	bun107	SPAC3H5.08c	wdr48	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982405231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793436	2543160	2542177	279591	278652	SPAC31A2.14	SPAC17H9.08	bun107	SPAC17H9.08	wdr48	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.619229314	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793437	2543160	2541615	279591	278112	SPAC31A2.14	SPAC27D7.11c	bun107	SPAC27D7.11c	wdr48	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.102429634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793438	2543160	2543593	279591	280008	SPAC31A2.14	SPAC4G9.10	bun107	arg3	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844706181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793439	2543160	2541545	279591	278045	SPAC31A2.14	SPAC22F8.07c	bun107	rtf1	wdr48	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.144522774	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793440	2543160	2540150	279591	276687	SPAC31A2.14	SPBC16E9.14c	bun107	zrg17	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.125207413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793441	2543160	2542168	279591	278643	SPAC31A2.14	SPAC17A5.16	bun107	ftp105	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.988790259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793442	2543160	2541109	279591	277624	SPAC31A2.14	SPBC6B1.02	bun107	ppk30	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.524360236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793443	2543160	2540326	279591	276856	SPAC31A2.14	SPBC2G5.06c	bun107	hmt2	wdr48	cad1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.413093026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793444	2543160	2540318	279591	276848	SPAC31A2.14	SPBC30B4.04c	bun107	sol1	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.762258981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793445	2543160	2541389	279591	277900	SPAC31A2.14	SPBPB2B2.09c	bun107	SPBPB2B2.09c	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320808272	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793446	2543160	2540019	279591	276563	SPAC31A2.14	SPBC1685.01	bun107	pmp1	wdr48	dsp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.886621068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793447	2543160	2538708	279591	275292	SPAC31A2.14	SPCC594.01	bun107	SPCC594.01	wdr48	SPCC736.16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.273812408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793448	2543160	2540342	279591	276871	SPAC31A2.14	SPBC2G2.01c	bun107	liz1	wdr48	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.346074177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793449	2543160	2541614	279591	278111	SPAC31A2.14	SPAC29A4.20	bun107	elp3	wdr48	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.627633082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793450	2543160	2541378	279591	277889	SPAC31A2.14	SPBP8B7.21	bun107	ubp3	wdr48	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.027914059	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793451	2543160	2542673	279591	279126	SPAC31A2.14	SPAC26A3.11	bun107	SPAC26A3.11	wdr48	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.564921329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793452	2543160	2542875	279591	279320	SPAC31A2.14	SPAC13G7.02c	bun107	ssa1	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700537983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793453	2543160	2543391	279591	279813	SPAC31A2.14	SPAC4G9.09c	bun107	arg11	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.331718993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793454	2543160	2540800	279591	277319	SPAC31A2.14	SPBC409.20c	bun107	psh3	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.542781481	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793455	2543160	2543304	279591	279728	SPAC31A2.14	SPAC6B12.12	bun107	tom70	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.569418505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793456	2543160	2540725	279591	277248	SPAC31A2.14	SPBC215.14c	bun107	vps20	wdr48	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815230188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793457	2543160	2539514	279591	276076	SPAC31A2.14	SPCC663.14c	bun107	trp663	wdr48	SPCC663.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639873135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793458	2543160	2541404	279591	277913	SPAC31A2.14	SPBPB2B2.18	bun107	SPBPB2B2.18	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.13596477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793459	2543160	2538840	279591	275421	SPAC31A2.14	SPCC736.07c	bun107	SPCC736.07c	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576773115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793460	2543160	2538854	279591	275435	SPAC31A2.14	SPCP1E11.05c	bun107	are2	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.714086071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793461	2543160	2540208	279591	276741	SPAC31A2.14	SPBC9B6.03	bun107	SPBC9B6.03	wdr48	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317644569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793462	2543160	2540787	279591	277306	SPAC31A2.14	SPBC1921.07c	bun107	sgf29	wdr48	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328975977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793463	2541728	2538961	278222	275535	SPAC20G4.03c	SPCC285.14	hri1	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994856274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793464	2541728	2543578	278222	279993	SPAC20G4.03c	SPAC9.10	hri1	thi9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812561593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793465	2541728	2539575	278222	276135	SPAC20G4.03c	SPCP20C8.02c	hri1	SPCP20C8.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.98626014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793466	2541728	2539937	278222	276481	SPAC20G4.03c	SPBC1539.08	hri1	arf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442836088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793467	2541728	2541035	278222	277550	SPAC20G4.03c	SPBC3E7.05c	hri1	SPBC3E7.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809110111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793468	2541728	2542983	278222	279421	SPAC20G4.03c	SPAC11D3.15	hri1	SPAC11D3.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.164809135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793469	2541728	2542861	278222	279307	SPAC20G4.03c	SPAC13G7.13c	hri1	msa1	-	SPAC6C3.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1235832	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793470	2541728	2542712	278222	279165	SPAC20G4.03c	SPAC25B8.17	hri1	SPAC25B8.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.850769745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793471	2541728	2539715	278222	276268	SPAC20G4.03c	SPBC1778.09	hri1	SPBC1778.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258643723	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793472	2541728	2540229	278222	276761	SPAC20G4.03c	SPBC31F10.15c	hri1	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.700569284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793473	2541728	2541175	278222	277689	SPAC20G4.03c	SPBC839.13c	hri1	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.62705085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793474	2541728	2540725	278222	277248	SPAC20G4.03c	SPBC215.14c	hri1	vps20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.382403785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793475	2541728	2541531	278222	278031	SPAC20G4.03c	SPAC25A8.01c	hri1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038104276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793476	2541728	2541678	278222	278174	SPAC20G4.03c	SPAP7G5.05	hri1	rpl1002	-	rpl10|rpl10-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256188324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793477	2541728	2540677	278222	277202	SPAC20G4.03c	SPBC21B10.03c	hri1	ath1	-	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.912135191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793478	2541728	2543420	278222	279842	SPAC20G4.03c	SPAC3H1.04c	hri1	mdm31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.447621419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793479	2541728	2539178	278222	275749	SPAC20G4.03c	SPCC1682.14	hri1	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.648048254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793480	3361455	2541117	280531	277632	SPAC1782.01	SPBC646.13	ecm29	sds23	SPAPYUG7.07	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.740637087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793481	3361455	2539235	280531	275805	SPAC1782.01	SPCC1682.15	ecm29	mug122	SPAPYUG7.07	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318910429	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793482	3361455	2541249	280531	277763	SPAC1782.01	SPBC947.01	ecm29	alf1	SPAPYUG7.07	SPBC947.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.257569232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793483	3361455	2541735	280531	278229	SPAC1782.01	SPAC7D4.04	ecm29	atg11	SPAPYUG7.07	taf1|cvt9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.122987977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793484	3361455	2543390	280531	279812	SPAC1782.01	SPAC631.01c	ecm29	acp2	SPAPYUG7.07	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767244849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793485	3361455	2542453	280531	278914	SPAC1782.01	SPAC186.01	ecm29	pfl9	SPAPYUG7.07	SPAC186.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.255631233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793486	3361455	2542767	280531	279217	SPAC1782.01	SPAC1565.07c	ecm29	knd1	SPAPYUG7.07	SPAC1565.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.804135447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793487	3361455	2541789	280531	278281	SPAC1782.01	SPAC23H4.08	ecm29	iwr1	SPAPYUG7.07	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.354498705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793488	3361455	2540125	280531	276662	SPAC1782.01	SPBC16C6.01c	ecm29	SPBC16C6.01c	SPAPYUG7.07	SPBC543.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820916909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793489	2540885	2542207	277402	278682	SPBC660.14	SPAC17H9.10c	mik1	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.736864157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793490	2540885	2542577	277402	279033	SPBC660.14	SPAC19G12.15c	mik1	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32177033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793491	2540885	2539201	277402	275772	SPBC660.14	SPCC188.09c	mik1	pfl4	-	SPCC188.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.510844108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793492	2540885	2539263	277402	275833	SPBC660.14	SPCC895.09c	mik1	ucp12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097299477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793493	2540885	2538806	277402	275387	SPBC660.14	SPCC1840.09	mik1	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.768353322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793494	2540885	2542050	277402	278529	SPBC660.14	SPAC212.02	mik1	SPAC212.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.874129885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793495	2540885	2541013	277402	277528	SPBC660.14	SPBC3H7.13	mik1	far10	-	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643403781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793496	2540885	2539249	277402	275819	SPBC660.14	SPCC1450.05c	mik1	rox3	-	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.201177101	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793497	2540885	2541026	277402	277541	SPBC660.14	SPBC337.09	mik1	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.705611395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793498	2540885	2542318	277402	278784	SPBC660.14	SPAC16C9.05	mik1	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.212457647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793499	2540885	2542791	277402	279240	SPBC660.14	SPAC167.04	mik1	pam17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984329097	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793500	2540885	3361543	277402	280619	SPBC660.14	SPAC9.13c	mik1	cwf16	-	SPAPJ735.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643187901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793501	2540885	2540964	277402	277480	SPBC660.14	SPBC365.16	mik1	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.912920531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793502	2540885	2542036	277402	278518	SPBC660.14	SPAC23A1.19c	mik1	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.410920502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793503	2540885	2542177	277402	278652	SPBC660.14	SPAC17H9.08	mik1	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383856266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793504	2540885	2538821	277402	275402	SPBC660.14	SPCC584.01c	mik1	SPCC584.01c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145575507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793505	2540885	2540797	277402	277316	SPBC660.14	SPBC18H10.11c	mik1	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.188930146	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793506	2540885	2540352	277402	276881	SPBC660.14	SPBC215.03c	mik1	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.169534446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793507	2540885	2540326	277402	276856	SPBC660.14	SPBC2G5.06c	mik1	hmt2	-	cad1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.617386127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793508	2540885	2541900	277402	278390	SPBC660.14	SPAC23H4.17c	mik1	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.665089634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793509	2540885	2542519	277402	278977	SPBC660.14	SPAC19G12.08	mik1	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.009025854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793510	2540885	2540229	277402	276761	SPBC660.14	SPBC31F10.15c	mik1	atp15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.337397461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793511	2540885	2543193	277402	279622	SPBC660.14	SPAC3F10.11c	mik1	abc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154779337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793512	2540885	2538762	277402	275345	SPBC660.14	SPCC306.04c	mik1	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390314134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793513	2540885	2540702	277402	277226	SPBC660.14	SPBC19F8.03c	mik1	yap18	-	SPBC19F8.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930440819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793514	2540885	2541229	277402	277743	SPBC660.14	SPBC839.05c	mik1	rps1701	-	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.815005207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793515	2540885	2540516	277402	277044	SPBC660.14	SPBC21C3.01c	mik1	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869608117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793516	2540885	2539375	277402	275941	SPBC660.14	SPCC4G3.11	mik1	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.012556952	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793517	2540885	2543337	277402	279760	SPBC660.14	SPAC959.08	mik1	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.144158114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793518	2540885	2541806	277402	278297	SPBC660.14	SPAC4G8.13c	mik1	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.518223877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793519	2540885	2543387	277402	279809	SPBC660.14	SPAPB1E7.02c	mik1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.968263334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793520	2540885	2542424	277402	278886	SPBC660.14	SPAC1805.14	mik1	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.258838983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793521	2540885	2541478	277402	277980	SPBC660.14	SPAC2F7.17	mik1	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.466108938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793522	2541650	2539050	278146	275623	SPAC14C4.12c	SPCC11E10.08	laf1	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503247711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793523	2541650	2540060	278146	276598	SPAC14C4.12c	SPBC106.01	laf1	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.551420456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793524	2541650	2539420	278146	275985	SPAC14C4.12c	SPCC970.07c	laf1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.740545544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793525	2541650	2542318	278146	278784	SPAC14C4.12c	SPAC16C9.05	laf1	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.175938229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793526	2541650	2540825	278146	277343	SPAC14C4.12c	SPBC428.08c	laf1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.86621392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793527	2541650	2541938	278146	278425	SPAC14C4.12c	SPAC8C9.16c	laf1	mug63	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.32438796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793528	2541650	2541776	278146	278270	SPAC14C4.12c	SPAC23H3.05c	laf1	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.054706133	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793529	2541650	2541009	278146	277524	SPAC14C4.12c	SPBC428.04	laf1	apq12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046965694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793530	2541650	2540229	278146	276761	SPAC14C4.12c	SPBC31F10.15c	laf1	atp15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.618526231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793531	2541650	2538848	278146	275429	SPAC14C4.12c	SPCC613.12c	laf1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.219561042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793532	2541650	2540498	278146	277026	SPAC14C4.12c	SPBC27.02c	laf1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.045048542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793533	2541650	2541372	278146	277883	SPAC14C4.12c	SPBP8B7.28c	laf1	stc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.723530908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793534	2541650	2538840	278146	275421	SPAC14C4.12c	SPCC736.07c	laf1	SPCC736.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.802820921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793535	2541650	2538792	278146	275373	SPAC14C4.12c	SPCP1E11.10	laf1	SPCP1E11.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3922333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793536	2541650	2542119	278146	278595	SPAC14C4.12c	SPAC1834.08	laf1	mak1	-	phk3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.361950591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793537	2541650	2543471	278146	279891	SPAC14C4.12c	SPAC513.07	laf1	SPAC513.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.491642075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793538	2542349	2542072	278814	278549	SPAC1782.05	SPAP32A8.03c	ypa2	bop1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPAP32A8.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09807246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793539	2542349	2538721	278814	275305	SPAC1782.05	SPCC1494.10	ypa2	adn3	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPCC70.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.38253893	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793540	2542349	2541475	278814	277977	SPAC1782.05	SPAC24B11.09	ypa2	mpc2	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPAC24B11.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.838962531	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793541	2542349	2541257	278814	277771	SPAC1782.05	SPBP23A10.14c	ypa2	ell1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325085746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793542	2542349	2540060	278814	276598	SPAC1782.05	SPBC106.01	ypa2	mph1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.564061507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793543	2542349	2543317	278814	279741	SPAC1782.05	SPAC823.14	ypa2	ptf1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864834306	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793544	2542349	2542598	278814	279052	SPAC1782.05	SPAC6G10.08	ypa2	idp1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.920378877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793545	2542349	2542723	278814	279174	SPAC1782.05	SPAC25H1.03	ypa2	atg101	SPAC1782.05|pta2	mug66	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.270886031	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793546	2542349	2540913	278814	277429	SPAC1782.05	SPBC56F2.08c	ypa2	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.408759021	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793547	2542349	2542372	278814	278836	SPAC1782.05	SPAC1F3.03	ypa2	SPAC1F3.03	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.741714003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793548	2542349	2541913	278814	278403	SPAC1782.05	SPAC227.04	ypa2	atg10	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPAC227.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455725112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793549	2542349	2542066	278814	278543	SPAC1782.05	SPAC227.05	ypa2	SPAC227.05	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.663672043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793550	2542349	2541426	278814	277931	SPAC1782.05	SPAC227.06	ypa2	SPAC227.06	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.413051396	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793551	2542349	2542812	278814	279259	SPAC1782.05	SPAC6F6.01	ypa2	cch1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.979750755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793552	2542349	2538977	278814	275551	SPAC1782.05	SPCC1020.06c	ypa2	tal1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193559668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793553	2542349	2539156	278814	275728	SPAC1782.05	SPCC1450.08c	ypa2	wtf16	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.137709472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793554	2542349	2541552	278814	278051	SPAC1782.05	SPAC1142.08	ypa2	fhl1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPAC8C9.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.564950111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793555	2542349	2542293	278814	278761	SPAC1782.05	SPAC17G8.14c	ypa2	pck1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPAC22H10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.297509212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793556	2542349	2542237	278814	278709	SPAC1782.05	SPAC19E9.02	ypa2	fin1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.131744489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793557	2542349	2539930	278814	276474	SPAC1782.05	SPBC1198.11c	ypa2	reb1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.84356274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793558	2542349	2539876	278814	276422	SPAC1782.05	SPBC1734.07c	ypa2	trs8502	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPBC1734.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873995578	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793559	2542349	2540068	278814	276606	SPAC1782.05	SPBC1734.12c	ypa2	alg12	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.368953002	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793560	2542349	2541117	278814	277632	SPAC1782.05	SPBC646.13	ypa2	sds23	SPAC1782.05|pta2	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325736324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793561	2542349	2541051	278814	277566	SPAC1782.05	SPBC3E7.08c	ypa2	rad13	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.048217472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793562	2542349	2539196	278814	275767	SPAC1782.05	SPCC1795.03	ypa2	gms1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	gmn3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.820855184	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793563	2542349	2541633	278814	278129	SPAC1782.05	SPAC664.01c	ypa2	swi6	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPAC824.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19465843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793564	2542349	2539944	278814	276488	SPAC1782.05	SPBC1198.06c	ypa2	SPBC1198.06c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387179242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793565	2542349	2540347	278814	276876	SPAC1782.05	SPBC30B4.08	ypa2	eri1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.408964119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793566	2542349	2540686	278814	277211	SPAC1782.05	SPBC21D10.10	ypa2	bdc1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.097001661	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793567	2542349	2541584	278814	278081	SPAC1782.05	SPAP32A8.02	ypa2	SPAP32A8.02	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.917404275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793568	2542349	2540579	278814	277105	SPAC1782.05	SPBC28E12.02	ypa2	SPBC28E12.02	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPBC9B6.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381701956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793569	2542349	2542892	278814	279336	SPAC1782.05	SPAC13F5.04c	ypa2	vta1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPAC13F5.04c|new6|SPAC13F5.08|vts1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808235029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793570	2542349	2540664	278814	277189	SPAC1782.05	SPBC215.02	ypa2	bob1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.513555704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793571	2542349	3361436	278814	280512	SPAC1782.05	SPAC1296.01c	ypa2	SPAC1296.01c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPAC22F3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980889394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793572	2542349	2540043	278814	276581	SPAC1782.05	SPBC1198.12	ypa2	mfr1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPBC660.02|fzr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444547287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793573	2542349	2543098	278814	279530	SPAC1782.05	SPAC4A8.06c	ypa2	SPAC4A8.06c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.561748207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793574	2542349	2540999	278814	277515	SPAC1782.05	SPBC4B4.04	ypa2	SPBC4B4.04	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099866204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793575	2542349	2540975	278814	277491	SPAC1782.05	SPBC354.12	ypa2	gpd3	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.212838781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793576	2542349	2541200	278814	277714	SPAC1782.05	SPBC8D2.03c	ypa2	hhf2	SPAC1782.05|pta2	ams3|h4.2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507191611	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793577	2542349	2541013	278814	277528	SPAC1782.05	SPBC3H7.13	ypa2	far10	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.059609604	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793578	2542349	2540979	278814	277495	SPAC1782.05	SPBC3H7.10	ypa2	elp6	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.342535801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793579	2542349	2541471	278814	277973	SPAC1782.05	SPAC1F5.03c	ypa2	SPAC1F5.03c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.687702147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793580	2542349	2542816	278814	279263	SPAC1782.05	SPAC4G8.11c	ypa2	atp10	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.919837175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793581	2542349	2542053	278814	278532	SPAC1782.05	SPAC2F3.07c	ypa2	SPAC2F3.07c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813516982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793582	2542349	2539913	278814	276457	SPAC1782.05	SPBC11G11.03	ypa2	mrt4	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.772459179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793583	2542349	2539564	278814	276125	SPAC1782.05	SPCC550.12	ypa2	arp6	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.405814336	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793584	2542349	2539463	278814	276026	SPAC1782.05	SPCC550.11	ypa2	SPCC550.11	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.064363826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793585	2542349	2543260	278814	279688	SPAC1782.05	SPAC1002.17c	ypa2	urg2	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.514711576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793586	2542349	2540919	278814	277435	SPAC1782.05	SPBC543.07	ypa2	pek1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	mkk1|skh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.86600151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793587	2542349	2539434	278814	275997	SPAC1782.05	SPCC757.09c	ypa2	rnc1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.92191211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793588	2542349	2541026	278814	277541	SPAC1782.05	SPBC337.09	ypa2	erg28	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.881748238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793589	2542349	2539117	278814	275689	SPAC1782.05	SPCC74.06	ypa2	mak3	SPAC1782.05|pta2	phk2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.640486692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793590	2542349	2540929	278814	277445	SPAC1782.05	SPBC354.03	ypa2	swd3	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.803138636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793591	2542349	2543048	278814	279483	SPAC1782.05	SPAC3F10.02c	ypa2	trk1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	sptrk	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.144110582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793592	2542349	2541761	278814	278255	SPAC1782.05	SPAC7D4.12c	ypa2	SPAC7D4.12c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.262700914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793593	2542349	2539895	278814	276441	SPAC1782.05	SPBC1683.10c	ypa2	pcl1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.040418199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793594	2542349	2540425	278814	276953	SPAC1782.05	SPBC27.06c	ypa2	mgr2	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.559556728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793595	2542349	2542135	278814	278611	SPAC1782.05	SPAC13A11.04c	ypa2	ubp8	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.880895057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793596	2542349	2539823	278814	276373	SPAC1782.05	SPBC16A3.18	ypa2	cip1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.155101694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793597	2542349	2540595	278814	277121	SPAC1782.05	SPBC21C3.02c	ypa2	dep1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383208878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793598	2542349	2540344	278814	276873	SPAC1782.05	SPBC30D10.03c	ypa2	SPBC30D10.03c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199189374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793599	2542349	2541923	278814	278411	SPAC1782.05	SPAC23C4.09c	ypa2	SPAC23C4.09c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.119443506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793600	2542349	2540127	278814	276664	SPAC1782.05	SPBC106.20	ypa2	exo70	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPBC582.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.361604587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793601	2542349	2539820	278814	276370	SPAC1782.05	SPBC1709.13c	ypa2	set10	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.763273857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793602	2542349	2543563	278814	279979	SPAC1782.05	SPAC664.02c	ypa2	arp8	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.269072491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793603	2542349	2543584	278814	279999	SPAC1782.05	SPAPB1E7.11c	ypa2	SPAPB1E7.11c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873091023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793604	2542349	2539100	278814	275672	SPAC1782.05	SPCC330.12c	ypa2	sdh3	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809852835	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793605	2542349	2540415	278814	276943	SPAC1782.05	SPBC30B4.06c	ypa2	SPBC30B4.06c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988752084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793606	2542349	2539381	278814	275947	SPAC1782.05	SPCC1739.10	ypa2	mug33	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.55821532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793607	2542349	2542253	278814	278723	SPAC1782.05	SPAC17H9.04c	ypa2	SPAC17H9.04c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.777675665	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793608	2542349	2542791	278814	279240	SPAC1782.05	SPAC167.04	ypa2	pam17	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.58000461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793609	2542349	2541021	278814	277536	SPAC1782.05	SPBC3B8.10c	ypa2	nem1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.922398205	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793610	2542349	2539467	278814	276030	SPAC1782.05	SPCC417.07c	ypa2	mto1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.985138446	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793611	2542349	2539237	278814	275807	SPAC1782.05	SPCC24B10.13	ypa2	skb5	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.408032536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793612	2542349	2538738	278814	275321	SPAC1782.05	SPCC320.14	ypa2	sry1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPCC320.14|SPCC330.15c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045475084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793613	2542349	2539804	278814	276354	SPAC1782.05	SPBC1105.11c	ypa2	hht3	SPAC1782.05|pta2	h3.3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.270153734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793614	2542349	2542177	278814	278652	SPAC1782.05	SPAC17H9.08	ypa2	SPAC17H9.08	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81817715	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793615	2542349	2542499	278814	278958	SPAC1782.05	SPAC1F12.04c	ypa2	SPAC1F12.04c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.27285614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793616	2542349	2541801	278814	278292	SPAC1782.05	SPAC2F7.08c	ypa2	snf5	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.001574083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793617	2542349	2541250	278814	277764	SPAC1782.05	SPBC8D2.17	ypa2	gmh4	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPBC8D2.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.69697923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793618	2542349	2541776	278814	278270	SPAC1782.05	SPAC23H3.05c	ypa2	swd1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.919078825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793619	2542349	2541264	278814	277778	SPAC1782.05	SPBC902.06	ypa2	mto2	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.067480944	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793620	2542349	2542863	278814	279309	SPAC1782.05	SPAC13G7.04c	ypa2	mac1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.160102231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793621	2542349	2543144	278814	279576	SPAC1782.05	SPAC3F10.05c	ypa2	mug113	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.533573421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793622	2542349	2540647	278814	277172	SPAC1782.05	SPBC18H10.07	ypa2	SPBC18H10.07	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514463095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793623	2542349	2542123	278814	278599	SPAC1782.05	SPAC18G6.15	ypa2	mal3	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.720536791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793624	2542349	2542507	278814	278965	SPAC1782.05	SPAC18G6.13	ypa2	SPAC18G6.13	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.917884682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793625	2542349	2539831	278814	276380	SPAC1782.05	SPBC15C4.05	ypa2	dhx29	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPBC15C4.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923127786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793626	2542349	2542983	278814	279421	SPAC1782.05	SPAC11D3.15	ypa2	SPAC11D3.15	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.712526704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793627	2542349	2538800	278814	275381	SPAC1782.05	SPCC1322.06	ypa2	kap113	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.715021591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793628	2542349	2539898	278814	276444	SPAC1782.05	SPBC12D12.07c	ypa2	trx2	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.132025729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793629	2542349	2541889	278814	278379	SPAC1782.05	SPAC2F7.03c	ypa2	pom1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.07912094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793630	2542349	2541258	278814	277772	SPAC1782.05	SPBC8E4.01c	ypa2	SPBC8E4.01c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPBP4G3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387125341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793631	2542349	2542522	278814	278980	SPAC1782.05	SPAC19A8.03	ypa2	ymr1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPAC19A8.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.678657959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793632	2542349	2542877	278814	279322	SPAC1782.05	SPAC13G6.15c	ypa2	SPAC13G6.15c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPAC24B11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.281132324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793633	2542349	2539603	278814	276161	SPAC1782.05	SPBC1289.06c	ypa2	ppr8	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.869259948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793634	2542349	2543245	278814	279673	SPAC1782.05	SPAC56F8.06c	ypa2	alg10	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.745129381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793635	2542349	2541352	278814	277863	SPAC1782.05	SPBPJ4664.03	ypa2	mfm3	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819690001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793636	2542349	2543643	278814	280057	SPAC1782.05	SPAC3G9.07c	ypa2	hos2	SPAC1782.05|pta2	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.407899579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793637	2542349	2541739	278814	278233	SPAC1782.05	SPAC2G11.10c	ypa2	SPAC2G11.10c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200988826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793638	2542349	2541830	278814	278321	SPAC1782.05	SPAC5H10.01	ypa2	SPAC5H10.01	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048912902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793639	2542349	2542007	278814	278490	SPAC1782.05	SPAC20H4.07	ypa2	rad57	SPAC1782.05|pta2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.129845792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793640	2542349	2540997	278814	277513	SPAC1782.05	SPBC3H7.06c	ypa2	pof9	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.046706854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793641	2542349	2543244	278814	279672	SPAC1782.05	SPAC6B12.06c	ypa2	rrg9	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.92194488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793642	2542349	2541828	278814	278319	SPAC1782.05	SPAC22H12.05c	ypa2	fsc1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPAC22H12.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.102954155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793643	2542349	2542946	278814	279386	SPAC1782.05	SPAC6F12.03c	ypa2	fsv1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.313725539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793644	2542349	2541607	278814	278104	SPAC1782.05	SPAC24B11.10c	ypa2	cfh1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	chr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.19304898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793645	2542349	2539850	278814	276398	SPAC1782.05	SPBC15D4.07c	ypa2	atg9	SPAC1782.05|pta2	apg9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455088329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793646	2542349	2539974	278814	276518	SPAC1782.05	SPBC32H8.07	ypa2	git5	SPAC1782.05|pta2	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.557313855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793647	2542349	2543253	278814	279681	SPAC1782.05	SPAC8C9.05	ypa2	SPAC8C9.05	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095617262	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793648	2542349	2540394	278814	276922	SPAC1782.05	SPBC2D10.09	ypa2	snr1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPBC2D10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.568851499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793649	2542349	2540836	278814	277354	SPAC1782.05	SPBC18H10.19	ypa2	vps38	SPAC1782.05|pta2	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.257382185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793650	2542349	2541241	278814	277755	SPAC1782.05	SPBC887.17	ypa2	SPBC887.17	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194722254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793651	2542349	2539958	278814	276502	SPAC1782.05	SPBC1718.07c	ypa2	zfs1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	moc4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.941327555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793652	2542349	2542254	278814	278724	SPAC1782.05	SPAC30D11.04c	ypa2	nup124	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.687627685	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793653	2542349	2540318	278814	276848	SPAC1782.05	SPBC30B4.04c	ypa2	sol1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.707081524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793654	2542349	2539408	278814	275973	SPAC1782.05	SPCC576.12c	ypa2	mhf2	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.259844267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793655	2542349	2538767	278814	275350	SPAC1782.05	SPCC1672.12c	ypa2	get4	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45028822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793656	2542349	2541009	278814	277524	SPAC1782.05	SPBC428.04	ypa2	apq12	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.55910805	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793657	2542349	2540530	278814	277058	SPAC1782.05	SPBC405.05	ypa2	atg16	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPBC405.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.071697857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793658	2542349	2543080	278814	279513	SPAC1782.05	SPAC3A11.10c	ypa2	SPAC3A11.10c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865010794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793659	2542349	2542439	278814	278901	SPAC1782.05	SPAC17A5.08	ypa2	erp2	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.754262673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793660	2542349	2543443	278814	279863	SPAC1782.05	SPAC3H1.12c	ypa2	snt2	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387362791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793661	2542349	2541389	278814	277900	SPAC1782.05	SPBPB2B2.09c	ypa2	SPBPB2B2.09c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.20017359	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793662	2542349	2540019	278814	276563	SPAC1782.05	SPBC1685.01	ypa2	pmp1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.484003124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793663	2542349	2542008	278814	278491	SPAC1782.05	SPAC2G11.07c	ypa2	ptc3	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.538564811	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793664	2542349	2538708	278814	275292	SPAC1782.05	SPCC594.01	ypa2	SPCC594.01	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPCC736.16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.409436791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793665	2542349	2540201	278814	276734	SPAC1782.05	SPBC13A2.04c	ypa2	ptr2	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05830273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793666	2542349	2541708	278814	278203	SPAC1782.05	SPAC31A2.02	ypa2	trm112	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818964366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793667	2542349	2540342	278814	276871	SPAC1782.05	SPBC2G2.01c	ypa2	liz1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701758776	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793668	2542349	2541053	278814	277568	SPAC1782.05	SPBC56F2.10c	ypa2	alg5	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.079005556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793669	2542349	2540967	278814	277483	SPAC1782.05	SPBC36B7.08c	ypa2	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.533724077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793670	2542349	2542267	278814	278736	SPAC1782.05	SPAPYUK71.03c	ypa2	syn1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869114511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793671	2542349	2540599	278814	277125	SPAC1782.05	SPBC29A3.10c	ypa2	atp14	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.980250876	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793672	2542349	2540016	278814	276560	SPAC1782.05	SPBC1773.09c	ypa2	mug184	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099958167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793673	2542349	2539059	278814	275632	SPAC1782.05	SPCC737.06c	ypa2	SPCC737.06c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.408030568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793674	2542349	2540533	278814	277061	SPAC1782.05	SPBC29A10.16c	ypa2	SPBC29A10.16c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.866248719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793675	2542349	2539711	278814	276264	SPAC1782.05	SPBC1683.09c	ypa2	frp1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.183981323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793676	2542349	2541488	278814	277990	SPAC1782.05	SPAC227.17c	ypa2	SPAC227.17c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.743987614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793677	2542349	2543477	278814	279897	SPAC1782.05	SPAPB2B4.04c	ypa2	SPAPB2B4.04c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	pmc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462038464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793678	2542349	2543011	278814	279449	SPAC1782.05	SPAC10F6.11c	ypa2	atg17	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.56740319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793679	2542349	2541337	278814	277848	SPAC1782.05	SPBP35G2.13c	ypa2	swc2	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.515616127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793680	2542349	2541896	278814	278386	SPAC1782.05	SPAC23H4.16c	ypa2	SPAC23H4.16c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515022156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793681	2542349	3361520	278814	280596	SPAC1782.05	SPAC1610.02c	ypa2	SPAC1610.02c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929813674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793682	2542349	2541017	278814	277532	SPAC1782.05	SPBC36.07	ypa2	elp1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.345184613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793683	2542349	2540946	278814	277462	SPAC1782.05	SPBC36.04	ypa2	cys11	SPAC1782.05|pta2	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.74040275	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793684	2542349	2542869	278814	279314	SPAC1782.05	SPAC140.02	ypa2	gar2	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864248823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793685	2542349	2542875	278814	279320	SPAC1782.05	SPAC13G7.02c	ypa2	ssa1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049307704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793686	2542349	2539877	278814	276423	SPAC1782.05	SPBC16G5.07c	ypa2	SPBC16G5.07c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.69161198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793687	2542349	2538907	278814	275484	SPAC1782.05	SPCC24B10.19c	ypa2	nts1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866020484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793688	2542349	2539160	278814	275732	SPAC1782.05	SPCC18.17c	ypa2	SPCC18.17c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928343191	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793689	2542349	2539354	278814	275920	SPAC1782.05	SPCC4F11.03c	ypa2	SPCC4F11.03c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.194180151	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793690	2542349	2541156	278814	277671	SPAC1782.05	SPBC685.07c	ypa2	rpl2701	SPAC1782.05|pta2	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.268836498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793691	2542349	2541370	278814	277881	SPAC1782.05	SPBP8B7.07c	ypa2	set6	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.155199786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793692	2542349	2539101	278814	275673	SPAC1782.05	SPCC736.04c	ypa2	gma12	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580046202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793693	2542349	2540809	278814	277328	SPAC1782.05	SPBC18A7.01	ypa2	SPBC18A7.01	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPBC4F6.19c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572866515	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793694	2542349	2542327	278814	278793	SPAC1782.05	SPAC16C9.06c	ypa2	upf1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.275125347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793695	2542349	2540619	278814	277145	SPAC1782.05	SPBC25H2.15	ypa2	SPBC25H2.15	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.057387107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793696	2542349	2540061	278814	276599	SPAC1782.05	SPBC119.12	ypa2	rud3	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPBC119.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.63674114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793697	2542349	2541371	278814	277882	SPAC1782.05	SPBP4H10.17c	ypa2	SPBP4H10.17c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	mrps2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.701150015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793698	2542349	2542883	278814	279328	SPAC1782.05	SPAC1486.04c	ypa2	alm1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.566224705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793699	2542349	2542401	278814	278865	SPAC1782.05	SPAC1142.02c	ypa2	SPAC1142.02c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPAC17G6.19c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.721889125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793700	2542349	2540814	278814	277333	SPAC1782.05	SPBC4B4.10c	ypa2	atg5	SPAC1782.05|pta2	mug77	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.764325397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793701	2542349	2540800	278814	277319	SPAC1782.05	SPBC409.20c	ypa2	psh3	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.361212181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793702	2542349	2543304	278814	279728	SPAC1782.05	SPAC6B12.12	ypa2	tom70	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.285791107	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793703	2542349	2542940	278814	279381	SPAC1782.05	SPAC31A2.12	ypa2	SPAC31A2.12	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.627946197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793704	2542349	2543160	278814	279591	SPAC1782.05	SPAC31A2.14	ypa2	bun107	SPAC1782.05|pta2	wdr48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.74388192	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793705	2542349	2541100	278814	277615	SPAC1782.05	SPBC651.04	ypa2	SPBC651.04	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.834063589	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793706	2542349	2541432	278814	277937	SPAC1782.05	SPAC1F5.05c	ypa2	mso1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.167180921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793707	2542349	2541367	278814	277878	SPAC1782.05	SPBP8B7.13	ypa2	vac7	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.402295862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793708	2542349	2538756	278814	275339	SPAC1782.05	SPCC1795.10c	ypa2	SPCC1795.10c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.421149372	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793709	2542349	2539013	278814	275586	SPAC1782.05	SPCC364.03	ypa2	rpl1702	SPAC1782.05|pta2	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.907985523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793710	2542349	2542418	278814	278881	SPAC1782.05	SPAC1805.07c	ypa2	dad2	SPAC1782.05|pta2	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.33339523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793711	2542349	2538916	278814	275493	SPAC1782.05	SPCC16C4.17	ypa2	mug123	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.269248473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793712	2542349	2541036	278814	277551	SPAC1782.05	SPBC3H7.05c	ypa2	SPBC3H7.05c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711795162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793713	2542349	2539729	278814	276281	SPAC1782.05	SPBC11B10.07c	ypa2	ivn1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	pi004|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.342060743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793714	2542349	2543228	278814	279656	SPAC1782.05	SPAC6B12.04c	ypa2	SPAC6B12.04c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.056852308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793715	2542349	2539188	278814	275759	SPAC1782.05	SPCC1827.04	ypa2	vms1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPCC1827.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864423047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793716	2542349	2540569	278814	277096	SPAC1782.05	SPBC660.17c	ypa2	SPBC660.17c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.994837398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793717	2542349	2541773	278814	278267	SPAC1782.05	SPAC23H4.02	ypa2	ppk9	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987522327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793718	2542349	2543420	278814	279842	SPAC1782.05	SPAC3H1.04c	ypa2	mdm31	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576453067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793719	2542349	2540202	278814	276735	SPAC1782.05	SPBC16G5.09	ypa2	SPBC16G5.09	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.689670853	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793720	2542349	2541823	278814	278314	SPAC1782.05	SPAC23H3.15c	ypa2	SPAC23H3.15c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPAC25H1.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647151951	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793721	2542349	2542891	278814	279335	SPAC1782.05	SPAC6F12.12	ypa2	par2	SPAC1782.05|pta2	pbp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.126041863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793722	2542349	2540927	278814	277443	SPAC1782.05	SPBC365.06	ypa2	pmt3	SPAC1782.05|pta2	smt3|ubl2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.047049693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793723	2542349	2541115	278814	277630	SPAC1782.05	SPBC660.07	ypa2	ntp1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.270551828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793724	2542349	2539207	278814	275777	SPAC1782.05	SPCC285.09c	ypa2	cgs2	SPAC1782.05|pta2	pde1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322196551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793725	2542349	2543633	278814	280047	SPAC1782.05	SPAC3H8.05c	ypa2	mms1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.344420201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793726	2542349	2540936	278814	277452	SPAC1782.05	SPBC800.05c	ypa2	atb2	SPAC1782.05|pta2	alp2|ban5|tub1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.559372352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793727	2542349	2543044	278814	279479	SPAC1782.05	SPAC3C7.12	ypa2	tip1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.944338467	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793728	2542349	2542386	278814	278850	SPAC1782.05	SPAC1805.01c	ypa2	ppk6	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPAPJ736.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.078678315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793729	2542349	2539702	278814	276255	SPAC1782.05	SPBC1604.12	ypa2	SPBC1604.12	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.714756538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793730	2542349	2539205	278814	275775	SPAC1782.05	SPCC4B3.15	ypa2	mid1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	dmf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.770785738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793731	2542349	3361117	278814	280193	SPAC1782.05	SPCC663.17	ypa2	wtf15	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.329138362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793732	2542349	3361511	278814	280587	SPAC1782.05	SPAC23C4.08	ypa2	rho3	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.502665796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793733	2542349	2539920	278814	276464	SPAC1782.05	SPBC119.08	ypa2	pmk1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	spm1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.870048346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793734	2542349	2543124	278814	279556	SPAC1782.05	SPAC3A11.06	ypa2	mvp1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984954509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793735	2542349	5802702	278814	857840	SPAC1782.05	SPCC1235.15	ypa2	dga1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPCC548.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632630421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793736	2542349	2540270	278814	276801	SPAC1782.05	SPBC2G2.02	ypa2	syj1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925520381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793737	2542349	2542021	278814	278504	SPAC1782.05	SPAP14E8.02	ypa2	tos4	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.449577058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793738	2542349	2542059	278814	278537	SPAC1782.05	SPAC328.06	ypa2	ubp2	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152933023	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793739	2542349	2541946	278814	278433	SPAC1782.05	SPAC2G11.04	ypa2	SPAC2G11.04	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145286056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793740	2542349	2542716	278814	279169	SPAC1782.05	SPAC25H1.07	ypa2	emc1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097677652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793741	2542349	2541806	278814	278297	SPAC1782.05	SPAC4G8.13c	ypa2	prz1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.640805718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793742	2542349	2541627	278814	278123	SPAC1782.05	SPAC1F5.08c	ypa2	yam8	SPAC1782.05|pta2	ehs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.84850283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793743	2542349	2540173	278814	276706	SPAC1782.05	SPBC106.13	ypa2	SPBC106.13	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577485114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793744	2542349	2540828	278814	277346	SPAC1782.05	SPBC4B4.06	ypa2	vps25	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.263290989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793745	2542349	2542175	278814	278650	SPAC1782.05	SPAC1F3.02c	ypa2	mkh1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.717474816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793746	2542349	2540314	278814	276844	SPAC1782.05	SPBC2G5.03	ypa2	ctu1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927236411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793747	2542349	2542795	278814	279243	SPAC1782.05	SPAC9G1.05	ypa2	aip1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPAC9G1.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.517657019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793748	2542349	2540360	278814	276889	SPAC1782.05	SPBC2G5.01	ypa2	SPBC2G5.01	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.562352324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793749	2542349	2541050	278814	277565	SPAC1782.05	SPBC428.05c	ypa2	arg12	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.890169369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793750	2542349	2539085	278814	275657	SPAC1782.05	SPCC285.15c	ypa2	rps2802	SPAC1782.05|pta2	rps28|rps28-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099532345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793751	2542349	2541808	278814	278299	SPAC1782.05	SPAC22A12.14c	ypa2	SPAC22A12.14c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924736954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793752	2542349	2538834	278814	275415	SPAC1782.05	SPCC126.08c	ypa2	SPCC126.08c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445796217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793753	2542349	2541320	278814	277832	SPAC1782.05	SPBC1271.03c	ypa2	SPBC1271.03c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.876951041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793754	2542349	2540309	278814	276839	SPAC1782.05	SPBC21B10.13c	ypa2	yox1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.313011269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793755	2542349	3361295	278814	280371	SPAC1782.05	SPBC1921.01c	ypa2	rpl35b	SPAC1782.05|pta2	rpl37|rpl37-1|rpl3701|SPBC29C10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506931916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793756	2542349	2542314	278814	278780	SPAC1782.05	SPAC16E8.06c	ypa2	nop12	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.03825908	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793757	2542349	2540938	278814	277454	SPAC1782.05	SPBC365.14c	ypa2	uge1	SPAC1782.05|pta2	gal10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321360454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793758	2542349	2542617	278814	279071	SPAC1782.05	SPAC13A11.01c	ypa2	rga8	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.241176647	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793759	2542349	2539148	278814	275720	SPAC1782.05	SPCC132.04c	ypa2	gdh2	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.103230561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793760	2542349	2540787	278814	277306	SPAC1782.05	SPBC1921.07c	ypa2	sgf29	SPAC1782.05|pta2	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.186872966	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793761	2542349	2542908	278814	279352	SPAC1782.05	SPAC13G7.03	ypa2	upf3	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866596624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793762	2542349	2539001	278814	275575	SPAC1782.05	SPCC1494.08c	ypa2	SPCC1494.08c	SPAC1782.05|pta2	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930129579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793763	2542349	2542571	278814	279027	SPAC1782.05	SPAC589.02c	ypa2	med13	SPAC1782.05|pta2	spTrap240|srb9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381136984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793764	2541062	2539050	277577	275623	SPBC660.11	SPCC11E10.08	tcg1	rik1	mug187	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.250755445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793765	2541062	2543064	277577	279497	SPBC660.11	SPAC3G6.01	tcg1	hrp3	mug187	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.286229506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793766	2541062	2539420	277577	275985	SPBC660.11	SPCC970.07c	tcg1	raf2	mug187	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321214026	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793767	2541062	2542050	277577	278529	SPBC660.11	SPAC212.02	tcg1	SPAC212.02	mug187	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.872354259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793768	2541062	2539249	277577	275819	SPBC660.11	SPCC1450.05c	tcg1	rox3	mug187	med19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200582225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793769	2541062	2540919	277577	277435	SPBC660.11	SPBC543.07	tcg1	pek1	mug187	mkk1|skh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.747512119	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793770	2541062	2542135	277577	278611	SPBC660.11	SPAC13A11.04c	tcg1	ubp8	mug187	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.506229358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793771	2541062	2542023	277577	278506	SPBC660.11	SPAC20H4.10	tcg1	ufd2	mug187	SPAC145.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.139948846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793772	2541062	2539244	277577	275814	SPBC660.11	SPCC1672.06c	tcg1	asp1	mug187	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.4398844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793773	2541062	2539023	277577	275596	SPBC660.11	SPCC594.05c	tcg1	spf1	mug187	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.178018817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793774	2541062	2541801	277577	278292	SPBC660.11	SPAC2F7.08c	tcg1	snf5	mug187	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.344235822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793775	2541062	2540892	277577	277408	SPBC660.11	SPBC530.01	tcg1	gyp1	mug187	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769766998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793776	2541062	2541776	277577	278270	SPBC660.11	SPAC23H3.05c	tcg1	swd1	mug187	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.294732358	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793777	2541062	2541160	277577	277675	SPBC660.11	SPBC725.09c	tcg1	hob3	mug187	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.124838267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793778	2541062	2541899	277577	278389	SPBC660.11	SPAC22E12.11c	tcg1	set3	mug187	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390100376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793779	2541062	2539293	277577	275861	SPBC660.11	SPCC553.08c	tcg1	ria1	mug187	SPCC553.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.263851445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793780	2541062	2543396	277577	279818	SPBC660.11	SPAC4D7.11	tcg1	dsc4	mug187	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.631403025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793781	2541062	2542032	277577	278514	SPBC660.11	SPAC23C11.04c	tcg1	pnk1	mug187	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.974317374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793782	2541062	2543236	277577	279664	SPBC660.11	SPAC8C9.04	tcg1	SPAC8C9.04	mug187	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819360539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793783	2541062	2541900	277577	278390	SPBC660.11	SPAC23H4.17c	tcg1	srb10	mug187	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.669401436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793784	2541062	2541410	277577	277918	SPBC660.11	SPBPB2B2.17c	tcg1	SPBPB2B2.17c	mug187	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.406146866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793785	2541062	2542255	277577	278725	SPBC660.11	SPAC57A7.08	tcg1	pzh1	mug187	phz1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.116736418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793786	2541062	2539519	277577	276081	SPBC660.11	SPCC364.05	tcg1	vps3	mug187	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573086416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793787	2541062	2538848	277577	275429	SPBC660.11	SPCC613.12c	tcg1	raf1	mug187	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505258965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793788	2541062	2538762	277577	275345	SPBC660.11	SPCC306.04c	tcg1	set1	mug187	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.148660511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793789	2541062	2543619	277577	280033	SPBC660.11	SPAC4F10.04	tcg1	ypa1	mug187	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.686750941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793790	2541062	2542883	277577	279328	SPBC660.11	SPAC1486.04c	tcg1	alm1	mug187	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581694728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793791	2541062	2543304	277577	279728	SPBC660.11	SPAC6B12.12	tcg1	tom70	mug187	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.598948364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793792	2541062	2540523	277577	277051	SPBC660.11	SPBC29A10.10c	tcg1	dbl8	mug187	SPBC29A10.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.248415992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793793	2541062	2543044	277577	279479	SPBC660.11	SPAC3C7.12	tcg1	tip1	mug187	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.136164583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793794	2541062	2539920	277577	276464	SPBC660.11	SPBC119.08	tcg1	pmk1	mug187	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.162262449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793795	2541062	2539483	277577	276046	SPBC660.11	SPCC584.02	tcg1	cuf2	mug187	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.77441827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793796	2541062	2540451	277577	276979	SPBC660.11	SPBC2G2.17c	tcg1	SPBC2G2.17c	mug187	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.480207503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793797	2541062	2542175	277577	278650	SPBC660.11	SPAC1F3.02c	tcg1	mkh1	mug187	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.347906244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793798	2541062	2540558	277577	277085	SPBC660.11	SPBC2D10.17	tcg1	clr1	mug187	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.300709725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793799	2539874	2538939	276420	275514	SPBC11B10.08	SPCC1672.04c	SPBC11B10.08	SPCC1672.04c	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.252418231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793800	2539874	2538796	276420	275377	SPBC11B10.08	SPCC63.06	SPBC11B10.08	SPCC63.06	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.919711391	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793801	2539874	2539788	276420	276338	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC17D1.02	SPBC11B10.08	dph2	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.257612058	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793802	2539874	2539405	276420	275970	SPBC11B10.08	SPCC553.03	SPBC11B10.08	pex1	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.13061226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793803	2539874	2539492	276420	276055	SPBC11B10.08	SPCPB16A4.06c	SPBC11B10.08	SPCPB16A4.06c	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985015967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793804	2539874	2539452	276420	276015	SPBC11B10.08	SPCC70.03c	SPBC11B10.08	SPCC70.03c	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319696999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793805	2539874	2541912	276420	278402	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC222.16c	SPBC11B10.08	csn3	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	SPAC821.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.506150724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793806	2539874	2542197	276420	278672	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC1142.01	SPBC11B10.08	rqc1	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	SPAC1142.01|SPAC17G6.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.678455784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793807	2539874	2543594	276420	280009	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC8F11.05c	SPBC11B10.08	mug130	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.93244911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793808	2539874	2539196	276420	275767	SPBC11B10.08	SPCC1795.03	SPBC11B10.08	gms1	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	gmn3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92825093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793809	2539874	2543432	276420	279852	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC4G8.05	SPBC11B10.08	ppk14	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152429091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793810	2539874	2541082	276420	277597	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC577.11	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC577.11	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.196522422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793811	2539874	3361570	276420	280646	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC750.01	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC750.01	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196376063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793812	2539874	2543661	276420	280075	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC644.08	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC644.08	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091872909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793813	2539874	2540692	276420	277217	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC800.07c	SPBC11B10.08	tsf1	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.50874635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793814	2539874	2539064	276420	275636	SPBC11B10.08	SPCC126.06	SPBC11B10.08	twf1	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932088968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793815	2539874	2541707	276420	278202	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC29E6.01	SPBC11B10.08	pof11	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	SPAC30.05|mug156	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.987890722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793816	2539874	2541428	276420	277933	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC14C4.11	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC14C4.11	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.277206393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793817	2539874	2543108	276420	279540	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC3A12.13c	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC3A12.13c	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517124834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793818	2539874	2541295	276420	277807	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC947.09	SPBC11B10.08	hsp3103	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	SPBC947.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.875605158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793819	2539874	2540023	276420	276567	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC11C11.10	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC11C11.10	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	SPBC3B8.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095926716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793820	2539874	2541663	276420	278159	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC22G7.08	SPBC11B10.08	ppk8	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633824145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793821	2539874	2539092	276420	275664	SPBC11B10.08	SPCC1259.08	SPBC11B10.08	SPCC1259.08	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868480454	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793822	2539874	2540893	276420	277409	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC543.10	SPBC11B10.08	get1	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.50768913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793823	2539874	2543573	276420	279988	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC869.11	SPBC11B10.08	cat1	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	SPAC922.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.625055727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793824	2539874	2541275	276420	277789	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC947.06c	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC947.06c	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923959581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793825	2539874	2540906	276420	277422	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC365.20c	SPBC11B10.08	pnc1	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	SPBC557.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.84293646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793826	2539874	2539990	276420	276534	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC1289.14	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC1289.14	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	SPBC8E4.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.368702772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793827	2539874	2540352	276420	276881	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC215.03c	SPBC11B10.08	csn1	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.146335677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793828	2539874	2539046	276420	275619	SPBC11B10.08	SPCC1223.12c	SPBC11B10.08	meu10	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.686063924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793829	2539874	2540136	276420	276673	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC1347.11	SPBC11B10.08	sro1	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.143911226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793830	2539874	2538945	276420	275519	SPBC11B10.08	SPCC1739.06c	SPBC11B10.08	SPCC1739.06c	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645139247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793831	2539874	2539815	276420	276365	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC1105.02c	SPBC11B10.08	lys4	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.629563921	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793832	2539874	2542498	276420	278957	SPBC11B10.08	SPACUNK4.16c	SPBC11B10.08	SPACUNK4.16c	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.84998165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793833	2539874	2539232	276420	275802	SPBC11B10.08	SPCC1223.04c	SPBC11B10.08	set11	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	mug76	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874180171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793834	2539874	2538723	276420	275307	SPBC11B10.08	SPCC31H12.06	SPBC11B10.08	mug111	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930256857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793835	2539874	2542867	276420	279312	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC343.16	SPBC11B10.08	lys2	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.380560364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793836	2539874	2539481	276420	276044	SPBC11B10.08	SPCC622.16c	SPBC11B10.08	epe1	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.197676063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793837	2539874	2543522	276420	279940	SPBC11B10.08	SPAPB24D3.08c	SPBC11B10.08	SPAPB24D3.08c	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989593379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793838	2539874	2542919	276420	279360	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC6C3.08	SPBC11B10.08	nas6	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	SPAC6C3.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577110303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793839	2539874	2539376	276420	275942	SPBC11B10.08	SPCC5E4.10c	SPBC11B10.08	SPCC5E4.10c	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.693959423	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793840	2539874	2543561	276420	279977	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC922.04	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC922.04	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042733216	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793841	2539874	2542060	276420	278538	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC23C11.14	SPBC11B10.08	zhf1	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	zhf	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.713590901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793842	2539874	2542255	276420	278725	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC57A7.08	SPBC11B10.08	pzh1	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.83784292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793843	2539874	2543009	276420	279447	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC10F6.06	SPBC11B10.08	vip1	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.041253165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793844	2539874	2540923	276420	277439	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC359.01	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC359.01	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	SPBPB10D8.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.74193977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793845	2539874	2538848	276420	275429	SPBC11B10.08	SPCC613.12c	SPBC11B10.08	raf1	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.003624892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793846	2539874	2540946	276420	277462	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC36.04	SPBC11B10.08	cys11	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.498754916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793847	2539874	2542806	276420	279254	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC1610.01	SPBC11B10.08	saf5	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.33500867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793848	2539874	2542286	276420	278754	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC1786.01c	SPBC11B10.08	ptl2	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	SPAC1786.01c|SPAC31G5.20c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.332950797	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793849	2539874	2539438	276420	276001	SPBC11B10.08	SPCC4B3.07	SPBC11B10.08	nro1	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.962108918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793850	2539874	2542401	276420	278865	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC1142.02c	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC1142.02c	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	SPAC17G6.19c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.449867754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793851	2539874	2540779	276420	277298	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC19F8.06c	SPBC11B10.08	meu22	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.199868182	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793852	2539874	2539955	276420	276499	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC119.16c	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC119.16c	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.198096352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793853	2539874	2540648	276420	277173	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC1921.05	SPBC11B10.08	ape2	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	ape1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92991898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793854	2539874	2543304	276420	279728	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC6B12.12	SPBC11B10.08	tom70	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.256560181	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793855	2539874	2542940	276420	279381	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC31A2.12	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC31A2.12	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57663558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793856	2539874	2541358	276420	277869	SPBC11B10.08	SPBP4H10.16c	SPBC11B10.08	SPBP4H10.16c	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934420618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793857	2539874	2543130	276420	279562	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC869.05c	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC869.05c	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.499091096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793858	2539874	2543377	276420	279799	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC3H1.07	SPBC11B10.08	aru1	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	car3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866893518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793859	2539874	2541380	276420	277891	SPBC11B10.08	SPBPB2B2.13	SPBC11B10.08	gal1	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570443503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793860	2539874	2543672	276420	280086	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC4H3.01	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC4H3.01	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.003268926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793861	2539874	2541115	276420	277630	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC660.07	SPBC11B10.08	ntp1	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.366994508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793862	2539874	2539928	276420	276472	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC11B10.08	imp1	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.446066651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793863	2539874	2539810	276420	276360	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC1271.07c	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC1271.07c	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.809343494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793864	2539874	2543379	276420	279801	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC821.09	SPBC11B10.08	eng1	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.97842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793865	2539874	2538981	276420	275555	SPBC11B10.08	SPCC330.06c	SPBC11B10.08	pmp20	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	SPCC330.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819443337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793866	2539874	2539014	276420	275587	SPBC11B10.08	SPCC18B5.05c	SPBC11B10.08	SPCC18B5.05c	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.836196502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793867	2539874	2542943	276420	279384	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC1348.03	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC1348.03	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440186621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793868	2539874	2542561	276420	279017	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC31G5.17c	SPBC11B10.08	rps1001	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	rps10-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.772167786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793869	2539874	2540811	276420	277330	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC19C7.05	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC19C7.05	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979377827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793870	2539874	2542444	276420	278906	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC17A5.05c	SPBC11B10.08	SPAC17A5.05c	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87496533	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793871	2539874	2539292	276420	275860	SPBC11B10.08	SPCC4G3.02	SPBC11B10.08	aph1	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511256163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793872	2539426	2539008	275991	275581	SPCC962.03c	SPCC584.03c	cut15	SPCC584.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.922031195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793873	2539426	2540893	275991	277409	SPCC962.03c	SPBC543.10	cut15	get1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.644571015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793874	2539426	2541776	275991	278270	SPCC962.03c	SPAC23H3.05c	cut15	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.43570508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793875	2539426	2542254	275991	278724	SPCC962.03c	SPAC30D11.04c	cut15	nup124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.900844772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793876	2539426	2538848	275991	275429	SPCC962.03c	SPCC613.12c	cut15	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.360980452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793877	2539426	2539928	275991	276472	SPCC962.03c	SPBC1604.08c	cut15	imp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.49181265	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793878	2539426	2540787	275991	277306	SPCC962.03c	SPBC1921.07c	cut15	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.328408175	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793879	2542029	2540999	278511	277515	SPAC8E11.02c	SPBC4B4.04	rad24	SPBC4B4.04	anr5|sam4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379189519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793880	2542029	2539310	278511	275877	SPAC8E11.02c	SPCC285.17	rad24	spp27	anr5|sam4	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440859523	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793881	2542029	2542007	278511	278490	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC20H4.07	rad24	rad57	anr5|sam4	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.056673237	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793882	2542029	2542716	278511	279169	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC25H1.07	rad24	emc1	anr5|sam4	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.31957168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793883	2543643	2539050	280057	275623	SPAC3G9.07c	SPCC11E10.08	hos2	rik1	hda1|phd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.855394148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793884	2543643	2540060	280057	276598	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC106.01	hos2	mph1	hda1|phd1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.709370351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793885	2543643	2543529	280057	279947	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC4C5.02c	hos2	ryh1	hda1|phd1	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.745099727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793886	2543643	3361561	280057	280637	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC11E3.01c	hos2	swr1	hda1|phd1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.662404328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793887	2543643	2540161	280057	276696	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC13E7.03c	hos2	SPBC13E7.03c	hda1|phd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.609002753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793888	2543643	2540347	280057	276876	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC30B4.08	hos2	eri1	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.212401223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793889	2543643	2540686	280057	277211	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC21D10.10	hos2	bdc1	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.294512582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793890	2543643	2538922	280057	275499	SPAC3G9.07c	SPCC16C4.10	hos2	SPCC16C4.10	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.639324074	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793891	2543643	2542273	280057	278742	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC17H9.13c	hos2	SPAC17H9.13c	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.536659867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793892	2543643	2539564	280057	276125	SPAC3G9.07c	SPCC550.12	hos2	arp6	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.710056863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793893	2543643	2542689	280057	279142	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC29B12.04	hos2	snz1	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381540903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793894	2543643	2539434	280057	275997	SPAC3G9.07c	SPCC757.09c	hos2	rnc1	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.676824537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793895	2543643	2539937	280057	276481	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC1539.08	hos2	arf6	hda1|phd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927675646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793896	2543643	2542277	280057	278746	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC17A5.02c	hos2	dbr1	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.690957932	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793897	2543643	2543308	280057	279732	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC694.04c	hos2	SPAC694.04c	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049063144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793898	2543643	2540595	280057	277121	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC21C3.02c	hos2	dep1	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.414795538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793899	2543643	2543563	280057	279979	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC664.02c	hos2	arp8	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.676060199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793900	2543643	2543426	280057	279846	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC631.02	hos2	bdf2	hda1|phd1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.520544155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793901	2543643	2539352	280057	275918	SPAC3G9.07c	SPCC188.07	hos2	ccq1	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.900162334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793902	2543643	2538972	280057	275546	SPAC3G9.07c	SPCC1739.15	hos2	wtf21	hda1|phd1	wtf3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445339061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793903	2543643	2542845	280057	279291	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC824.04	hos2	SPAC824.04	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.766694803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793904	2543643	2542665	280057	279118	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC10F6.08c	hos2	nht10	hda1|phd1	nht1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.836777542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793905	2543643	2542568	280057	279024	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC1952.02	hos2	tma23	hda1|phd1	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.475801169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793906	2543643	2541250	280057	277764	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC8D2.17	hos2	gmh4	hda1|phd1	SPBC8D2.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037230977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793907	2543643	2542513	280057	278971	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC1952.05	hos2	gcn5	hda1|phd1	kat2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.359926008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793908	2543643	2538770	280057	275353	SPAC3G9.07c	SPCC1753.02c	hos2	git3	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.861886679	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793909	2543643	2540348	280057	276877	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC29A10.05	hos2	exo1	hda1|phd1	mut2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.505547348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793910	2543643	2541038	280057	277553	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC29A10.01	hos2	ccr1	hda1|phd1	SPBC365.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.065937329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793911	2543643	2539733	280057	276285	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC16E9.12c	hos2	pab2	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.903691641	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793912	2543643	2541496	280057	277998	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC23D3.09	hos2	arp42	hda1|phd1	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.459048923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793913	2543643	2543667	280057	280081	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC4H3.02c	hos2	swc3	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.482081643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793914	2543643	2541710	280057	278205	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC343.11c	hos2	msc1	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.109185701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793915	2543643	2539667	280057	276222	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC13G1.08c	hos2	ash2	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.008498775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793916	2543643	2541720	280057	278214	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC23H3.13c	hos2	gpa2	hda1|phd1	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.806892904	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793917	2543643	2542549	280057	279006	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC19A8.11c	hos2	SPAC19A8.11c	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.765926807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793918	2543643	2541009	280057	277524	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC428.04	hos2	apq12	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.353517041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793919	2543643	2539953	280057	276497	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC1709.11c	hos2	png2	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.059886375	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793920	2543643	2543443	280057	279863	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC3H1.12c	hos2	snt2	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.290467925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793921	2543643	2541536	280057	278036	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC1071.02	hos2	mms19	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.191386267	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793922	2543643	2540967	280057	277483	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC36B7.08c	hos2	SPBC36B7.08c	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.373854207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793923	2543643	2539847	280057	276395	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC530.14c	hos2	dsk1	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.47545347	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793924	2543643	2541614	280057	278111	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC29A4.20	hos2	elp3	hda1|phd1	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.825473217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793925	2543643	2541337	280057	277848	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBP35G2.13c	hos2	swc2	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.891716943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793926	2543643	2543254	280057	279682	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC1006.03c	hos2	red1	hda1|phd1	iss3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.873342936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793927	2543643	2541713	280057	278208	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC3A12.12	hos2	atp11	hda1|phd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.381904748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793928	2543643	2540821	280057	277339	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC800.03	hos2	clr3	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.056559937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793929	2543643	2542806	280057	279254	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC1610.01	hos2	saf5	hda1|phd1	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.397408333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793930	2543643	2539354	280057	275920	SPAC3G9.07c	SPCC4F11.03c	hos2	SPCC4F11.03c	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.837992424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793931	2543643	2539555	280057	276116	SPAC3G9.07c	SPCC4B3.08	hos2	lsg1	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.31793246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793932	2543643	2539137	280057	275709	SPAC3G9.07c	SPCC1682.08c	hos2	mcp2	hda1|phd1	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318736294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793933	2543643	2543567	280057	279983	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC890.03	hos2	ppk16	hda1|phd1	mug92	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.889297318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793934	2543643	2540498	280057	277026	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC27.02c	hos2	ask1	hda1|phd1	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.728537663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793935	2543643	2539925	280057	276469	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC16H5.13	hos2	SPBC16H5.13	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.514731457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793936	2543643	2538966	280057	275540	SPAC3G9.07c	SPCC18.10	hos2	SPCC18.10	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.864813394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793937	2543643	2543096	280057	279528	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC977.05c	hos2	SPAC977.05c	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.381713689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793938	2543643	2540531	280057	277059	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC23E6.08	hos2	sat1	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.568511462	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793939	2543643	2541531	280057	278031	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC25A8.01c	hos2	fft3	hda1|phd1	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.2627804	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793940	2543643	2539136	280057	275708	SPAC3G9.07c	SPCC1919.05	hos2	SPCC1919.05	hda1|phd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.952964826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793941	2543643	2541535	280057	278035	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC12G12.10	hos2	wdr21	hda1|phd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.993527538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793942	2543643	2542826	280057	279273	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC13G6.09	hos2	SPAC13G6.09	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.878690816	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793943	2543643	2539668	280057	276223	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC11B10.10c	hos2	pht1	hda1|phd1	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.471037054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793944	2543643	2541789	280057	278281	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC23H4.08	hos2	iwr1	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.085180581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793945	2543643	2542891	280057	279335	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC6F12.12	hos2	par2	hda1|phd1	pbp2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.838370872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793946	2543643	2540555	280057	277082	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBP16F5.02	hos2	mcs2	hda1|phd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.183278193	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793947	2543643	2541806	280057	278297	SPAC3G9.07c	SPAC4G8.13c	hos2	prz1	hda1|phd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992418015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793948	2543643	2540173	280057	276706	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC106.13	hos2	SPBC106.13	hda1|phd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.028195807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793949	2543643	2540787	280057	277306	SPAC3G9.07c	SPBC1921.07c	hos2	sgf29	hda1|phd1	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455878269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793950	2541375	2542273	277886	278742	SPBP8B7.31	SPAC17H9.13c	SPBP8B7.31	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.888009344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793951	2541375	2543663	277886	280077	SPBP8B7.31	SPAC644.07	SPBP8B7.31	SPAC644.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813817263	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793952	2541375	2540829	277886	277347	SPBP8B7.31	SPBC800.09	SPBP8B7.31	sum2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.299164878	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793953	2541375	2542059	277886	278537	SPBP8B7.31	SPAC328.06	SPBP8B7.31	ubp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392238702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793954	2541375	2542943	277886	279384	SPBP8B7.31	SPBC1348.03	SPBP8B7.31	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819255891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793955	2541375	2542094	277886	278571	SPBP8B7.31	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBP8B7.31	rcd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038178329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793956	2541899	2540060	278389	276598	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC106.01	set3	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.20412128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793957	2541899	2543529	278389	279947	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC4C5.02c	set3	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.312640854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793958	2541899	2542585	278389	279040	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC31A2.13c	set3	sft1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.912522452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793959	2541899	2541117	278389	277632	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC646.13	set3	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.052249445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793960	2541899	2540161	278389	276696	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC13E7.03c	set3	SPBC13E7.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.146332857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793961	2541899	2540347	278389	276876	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC30B4.08	set3	eri1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.429466725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793962	2541899	2540686	278389	277211	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC21D10.10	set3	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.572876521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793963	2541899	2538922	278389	275499	SPAC22E12.11c	SPCC16C4.10	set3	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.97701363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793964	2541899	2539564	278389	276125	SPAC22E12.11c	SPCC550.12	set3	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.601431636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793965	2541899	2539434	278389	275997	SPAC22E12.11c	SPCC757.09c	set3	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.616179831	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793966	2541899	2540929	278389	277445	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC354.03	set3	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.359043209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793967	2541899	2542277	278389	278746	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC17A5.02c	set3	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.276100363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793968	2541899	2543308	278389	279732	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC694.04c	set3	SPAC694.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.062010462	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793969	2541899	2540595	278389	277121	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC21C3.02c	set3	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.219686346	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793970	2541899	2539244	278389	275814	SPAC22E12.11c	SPCC1672.06c	set3	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511641064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793971	2541899	2543563	278389	279979	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC664.02c	set3	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.047869338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793972	2541899	2543426	278389	279846	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC631.02	set3	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.241198225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793973	2541899	2539352	278389	275918	SPAC22E12.11c	SPCC188.07	set3	ccq1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.187899073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793974	2541899	2542845	278389	279291	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC824.04	set3	SPAC824.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.445520732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793975	2541899	2542311	278389	278777	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC16A10.05c	set3	dad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.174539487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793976	2541899	2538770	278389	275353	SPAC22E12.11c	SPCC1753.02c	set3	git3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.698302393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793977	2541899	2541038	278389	277553	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC29A10.01	set3	ccr1	-	SPBC365.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.41201674	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793978	2541899	2542507	278389	278965	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC18G6.13	set3	SPAC18G6.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378571374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793979	2541899	2539733	278389	276285	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC16E9.12c	set3	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.834395522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793980	2541899	2541496	278389	277998	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC23D3.09	set3	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.170242914	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793981	2541899	2543667	278389	280081	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC4H3.02c	set3	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.305075138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793982	2541899	2541710	278389	278205	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC343.11c	set3	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.474339833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793983	2541899	2539667	278389	276222	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC13G1.08c	set3	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.725519763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793984	2541899	2542976	278389	279414	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC9E9.09c	set3	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783128806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793985	2541899	2541720	278389	278214	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC23H3.13c	set3	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.898361574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793986	2541899	2541900	278389	278390	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC23H4.17c	set3	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.083895223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793987	2541899	2541009	278389	277524	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC428.04	set3	apq12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.475074628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793988	2541899	2539953	278389	276497	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC1709.11c	set3	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.521551916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793989	2541899	2543443	278389	279863	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC3H1.12c	set3	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.261076243	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793990	2541899	2541536	278389	278036	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC1071.02	set3	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.112956789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793991	2541899	2540342	278389	276871	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC2G2.01c	set3	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.649488856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793992	2541899	2540967	278389	277483	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC36B7.08c	set3	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.847752511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793993	2541899	2539847	278389	276395	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC530.14c	set3	dsk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.238171458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793994	2541899	2541337	278389	277848	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBP35G2.13c	set3	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.134293252	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793995	2541899	2541713	278389	278208	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC3A12.12	set3	atp11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.23919009	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793996	2541899	2540821	278389	277339	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC800.03	set3	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.819473903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793997	2541899	2539763	278389	276314	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC1861.05	set3	SPBC1861.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.932296504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793998	2541899	2542806	278389	279254	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC1610.01	set3	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.119061997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
793999	2541899	2541786	278389	278278	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC22F3.08c	set3	rok1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.484338036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794000	2541899	2540061	278389	276599	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC119.12	set3	rud3	-	SPBC119.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641211749	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794001	2541899	2540498	278389	277026	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC27.02c	set3	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.065548791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794002	2541899	2539925	278389	276469	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC16H5.13	set3	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.776092476	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794003	2541899	2538966	278389	275540	SPAC22E12.11c	SPCC18.10	set3	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.450422651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794004	2541899	2542458	278389	278919	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC30.02c	set3	SPAC30.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.717304709	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794005	2541899	2541531	278389	278031	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC25A8.01c	set3	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.55947092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794006	2541899	2542418	278389	278881	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC1805.07c	set3	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.660185419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794007	2541899	2541535	278389	278035	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC12G12.10	set3	wdr21	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042526858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794008	2541899	2542826	278389	279273	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC13G6.09	set3	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.939761487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794009	2541899	2539668	278389	276223	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC11B10.10c	set3	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.916484204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794010	2541899	2539928	278389	276472	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC1604.08c	set3	imp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.64416834	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794011	2541899	2543277	278389	279705	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC1002.03c	set3	gls2	-	gls2alpha	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.252794311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794012	2541899	2541869	278389	278359	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC22F3.13	set3	tsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.472542759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794013	2541899	2541062	278389	277577	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC660.11	set3	tcg1	-	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390100376	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794014	2541899	2540787	278389	277306	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC1921.07c	set3	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.950561224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794015	2540451	2540694	276979	277218	SPBC2G2.17c	SPBC19C7.10	SPBC2G2.17c	bqt4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440224318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794016	2540451	2542677	276979	279130	SPBC2G2.17c	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC2G2.17c	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.411090369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794017	2540451	2542555	276979	279012	SPBC2G2.17c	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC2G2.17c	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.313991699	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794018	2540451	2539792	276979	276342	SPBC2G2.17c	SPBC1271.14	SPBC2G2.17c	SPBC1271.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.70360659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794019	2540451	2540886	276979	277403	SPBC2G2.17c	SPBC4F6.10	SPBC2G2.17c	vps901	-	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.444488506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794020	2540451	2539974	276979	276518	SPBC2G2.17c	SPBC32H8.07	SPBC2G2.17c	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.748283754	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794021	2540451	2541720	276979	278214	SPBC2G2.17c	SPAC23H3.13c	SPBC2G2.17c	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.751576208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794022	2540451	2540599	276979	277125	SPBC2G2.17c	SPBC29A3.10c	SPBC2G2.17c	atp14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.077467742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794023	2540451	2541371	276979	277882	SPBC2G2.17c	SPBP4H10.17c	SPBC2G2.17c	SPBP4H10.17c	-	mrps2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.705438056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794024	2540451	2541358	276979	277869	SPBC2G2.17c	SPBP4H10.16c	SPBC2G2.17c	SPBP4H10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781634112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794025	2540451	2541531	276979	278031	SPBC2G2.17c	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC2G2.17c	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.394107859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794026	2540451	2541773	276979	278267	SPBC2G2.17c	SPAC23H4.02	SPBC2G2.17c	ppk9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508081562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794027	2540451	2541238	276979	277752	SPBC2G2.17c	SPBC8E4.05c	SPBC2G2.17c	SPBC8E4.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.985647162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794028	2540451	2542424	276979	278886	SPBC2G2.17c	SPAC1805.14	SPBC2G2.17c	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327555742	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794029	2540451	2541062	276979	277577	SPBC2G2.17c	SPBC660.11	SPBC2G2.17c	tcg1	-	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.480207503	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794030	2542467	2541345	278928	277856	SPAC1834.04	SPBP35G2.07	hht1	ilv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.503982792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794031	2542467	2541776	278928	278270	SPAC1834.04	SPAC23H3.05c	hht1	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.58142226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794032	2542467	2543245	278928	279673	SPAC1834.04	SPAC56F8.06c	hht1	alg10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780819412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794033	2542467	2542439	278928	278901	SPAC1834.04	SPAC17A5.08	hht1	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512112534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794034	2542467	2543390	278928	279812	SPAC1834.04	SPAC631.01c	hht1	acp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381259903	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794035	2542467	2539246	278928	275816	SPAC1834.04	SPCC18.13	hht1	SPCC18.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.4399387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794036	2542467	2539668	278928	276223	SPAC1834.04	SPBC11B10.10c	hht1	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577979472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794037	2542467	2543387	278928	279809	SPAC1834.04	SPAPB1E7.02c	hht1	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049462056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794038	2541575	2543529	278072	279947	SPAC12B10.01c	SPAC4C5.02c	SPAC12B10.01c	ryh1	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.948754998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794039	2541575	2539492	278072	276055	SPAC12B10.01c	SPCPB16A4.06c	SPAC12B10.01c	SPCPB16A4.06c	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869834644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794040	2541575	2543132	278072	279564	SPAC12B10.01c	SPAC8E11.06	SPAC12B10.01c	SPAC8E11.06	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.518380094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794041	2541575	2542502	278072	278960	SPAC12B10.01c	SPAC139.06	SPAC12B10.01c	hat1	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.20386315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794042	2541575	2542747	278072	279197	SPAC12B10.01c	SPAC15A10.06	SPAC12B10.01c	SPAC15A10.06	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046964013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794043	2541575	2542689	278072	279142	SPAC12B10.01c	SPAC29B12.04	SPAC12B10.01c	snz1	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322980437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794044	2541575	2542627	278072	279081	SPAC12B10.01c	SPAC750.04c	SPAC12B10.01c	SPAC750.04c	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319359619	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794045	2541575	2540929	278072	277445	SPAC12B10.01c	SPBC354.03	SPAC12B10.01c	swd3	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864447038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794046	2541575	2539574	278072	276134	SPAC12B10.01c	SPCPB16A4.04c	SPAC12B10.01c	trm8	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330799324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794047	2541575	2541021	278072	277536	SPAC12B10.01c	SPBC3B8.10c	SPAC12B10.01c	nem1	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.69917885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794048	2541575	2542484	278072	278944	SPAC12B10.01c	SPAC1A6.07	SPAC12B10.01c	sle1	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	SPAC1A6.07|seg1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.502867174	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794049	2541575	2538811	278072	275392	SPAC12B10.01c	SPCC330.03c	SPAC12B10.01c	SPCC330.03c	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096330271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794050	2541575	2541892	278072	278382	SPAC12B10.01c	SPAP27G11.02	SPAC12B10.01c	SPAP27G11.02	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.664144363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794051	2541575	2543245	278072	279673	SPAC12B10.01c	SPAC56F8.06c	SPAC12B10.01c	alg10	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992074734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794052	2541575	2540997	278072	277513	SPAC12B10.01c	SPBC3H7.06c	SPAC12B10.01c	pof9	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322070301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794053	2541575	2542901	278072	279345	SPAC12B10.01c	SPAC13F5.07c	SPAC12B10.01c	SPAC13F5.07c	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.566989406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794054	2541575	2540104	278072	276641	SPAC12B10.01c	SPBC1709.16c	SPAC12B10.01c	SPBC1709.16c	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633217935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794055	2541575	2541054	278072	277569	SPAC12B10.01c	SPBC3B8.08	SPAC12B10.01c	SPBC3B8.08	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.053246525	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794056	2541575	2543390	278072	279812	SPAC12B10.01c	SPAC631.01c	SPAC12B10.01c	acp2	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45409889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794057	2541575	2538690	278072	275275	SPAC12B10.01c	SPCC1393.05	SPAC12B10.01c	ers1	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504409022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794058	2541575	2542806	278072	279254	SPAC12B10.01c	SPAC1610.01	SPAC12B10.01c	saf5	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844014112	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794059	2541575	2538762	278072	275345	SPAC12B10.01c	SPCC306.04c	SPAC12B10.01c	set1	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985572371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794060	2541575	2539362	278072	275928	SPAC12B10.01c	SPCC18B5.10c	SPAC12B10.01c	SPCC18B5.10c	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.558048491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794061	2541575	2542947	278072	279387	SPAC12B10.01c	SPAC11D3.03c	SPAC12B10.01c	SPAC11D3.03c	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.12736345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794062	2541575	2540998	278072	277514	SPAC12B10.01c	SPBC3D6.05	SPAC12B10.01c	ptp4	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381442471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794063	2541575	3361193	278072	280269	SPAC12B10.01c	SPBC19G7.18c	SPAC12B10.01c	SPBC19G7.18c	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	SPBC19G7.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.581027681	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794064	2541575	2539188	278072	275759	SPAC12B10.01c	SPCC1827.04	SPAC12B10.01c	vms1	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	SPCC1827.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.646898985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794065	2541575	2542021	278072	278504	SPAC12B10.01c	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC12B10.01c	tos4	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	SPAP14E8.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.035781204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794066	2541575	2542185	278072	278660	SPAC12B10.01c	SPAC18G6.01c	SPAC12B10.01c	SPAC18G6.01c	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.769724405	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794067	2540801	2542273	277320	278742	SPBC18H10.10c	SPAC17H9.13c	saf4	SPAC17H9.13c	cwc16|cwf16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.465796172	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794068	2540801	2541500	277320	278002	SPBC18H10.10c	SPAC227.18	saf4	lys3	cwc16|cwf16	SPAC2F7.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.370579728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794069	2540801	2540692	277320	277217	SPBC18H10.10c	SPBC800.07c	saf4	tsf1	cwc16|cwf16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.378410935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794070	2540801	2539792	277320	276342	SPBC18H10.10c	SPBC1271.14	saf4	SPBC1271.14	cwc16|cwf16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.37561417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794071	2540801	2540964	277320	277480	SPBC18H10.10c	SPBC365.16	saf4	SPBC365.16	cwc16|cwf16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.717438312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794072	2540801	2543593	277320	280008	SPBC18H10.10c	SPAC4G9.10	saf4	arg3	cwc16|cwf16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.622679892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794073	2540801	2543638	277320	280052	SPBC18H10.10c	SPAC3H8.09c	saf4	nab3	cwc16|cwf16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.66171698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794074	2540801	2541183	277320	277697	SPBC18H10.10c	SPBC725.14	saf4	arg6	cwc16|cwf16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.813497011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794075	2540801	2542946	277320	279386	SPBC18H10.10c	SPAC6F12.03c	saf4	fsv1	cwc16|cwf16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.677942005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794076	2540801	2540751	277320	277273	SPBC18H10.10c	SPBC20F10.10	saf4	psl1	cwc16|cwf16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.951060638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794077	2540801	2539815	277320	276365	SPBC18H10.10c	SPBC1105.02c	saf4	lys4	cwc16|cwf16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.010239708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794078	2540801	2542867	277320	279312	SPBC18H10.10c	SPAC343.16	saf4	lys2	cwc16|cwf16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.088812575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794079	2540801	2540387	277320	276915	SPBC18H10.10c	SPBC24C6.04	saf4	SPBC24C6.04	cwc16|cwf16	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.459921507	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794080	2540801	2542597	277320	279051	SPBC18H10.10c	SPAP8A3.07c	saf4	SPAP8A3.07c	cwc16|cwf16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.498555602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794081	2540801	2541186	277320	277700	SPBC18H10.10c	SPBC725.01	saf4	SPBC725.01	cwc16|cwf16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.878080648	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794082	2540801	2538884	277320	275462	SPBC18H10.10c	SPCC1393.08	saf4	SPCC1393.08	cwc16|cwf16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.986383217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794083	2540801	3361520	277320	280596	SPBC18H10.10c	SPAC1610.02c	saf4	SPAC1610.02c	cwc16|cwf16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.136261614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794084	2540801	2542806	277320	279254	SPBC18H10.10c	SPAC1610.01	saf4	saf5	cwc16|cwf16	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638122772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794085	2540801	2543391	277320	279813	SPBC18H10.10c	SPAC4G9.09c	saf4	arg11	cwc16|cwf16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.858215348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794086	2540801	2538762	277320	275345	SPBC18H10.10c	SPCC306.04c	saf4	set1	cwc16|cwf16	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.211978535	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794087	2540801	2540619	277320	277145	SPBC18H10.10c	SPBC25H2.15	saf4	SPBC25H2.15	cwc16|cwf16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514792789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794088	2540801	2543567	277320	279983	SPBC18H10.10c	SPAC890.03	saf4	ppk16	cwc16|cwf16	mug92	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.765104544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794089	2540801	2541709	277320	278204	SPBC18H10.10c	SPAC3C7.02c	saf4	pil2	cwc16|cwf16	SPAC3C7.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.827990775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794090	2540801	2541050	277320	277565	SPBC18H10.10c	SPBC428.05c	saf4	arg12	cwc16|cwf16	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.277529818	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794091	2543360	2540279	279782	276810	SPAC664.10	SPBC3B8.04c	klp2	SPBC3B8.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637242808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794092	2543360	2540455	279782	276983	SPAC664.10	SPBC215.05	klp2	gpd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.390054144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794093	2543360	2539937	279782	276481	SPAC664.10	SPBC1539.08	klp2	arf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.70214909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794094	2543360	2543304	279782	279728	SPAC664.10	SPAC6B12.12	klp2	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.336773765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794095	2542390	2540060	278854	276598	SPAC6F6.11c	SPBC106.01	SPAC6F6.11c	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.817729345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794096	2542390	2540913	278854	277429	SPAC6F6.11c	SPBC56F2.08c	SPAC6F6.11c	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195638607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794097	2542390	2543641	278854	280055	SPAC6F6.11c	SPAC3H5.08c	SPAC6F6.11c	SPAC3H5.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379436929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794098	2542390	2542791	278854	279240	SPAC6F6.11c	SPAC167.04	SPAC6F6.11c	pam17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.625281373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794099	2542390	2542268	278854	278737	SPAC6F6.11c	SPAC17A5.07c	SPAC6F6.11c	ulp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.030705545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794100	2542390	2542177	278854	278652	SPAC6F6.11c	SPAC17H9.08	SPAC6F6.11c	SPAC17H9.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.408584104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794101	2542390	2542861	278854	279307	SPAC6F6.11c	SPAC13G7.13c	SPAC6F6.11c	msa1	-	SPAC6C3.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.873543584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794102	2542390	2540836	278854	277354	SPAC6F6.11c	SPBC18H10.19	SPAC6F6.11c	vps38	-	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.806162558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794103	2542390	2541746	278854	278240	SPAC6F6.11c	SPAC20G4.04c	SPAC6F6.11c	hus1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.89600957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794104	2542390	2539178	278854	275749	SPAC6F6.11c	SPCC1682.14	SPAC6F6.11c	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440392115	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794105	2542390	2542059	278854	278537	SPAC6F6.11c	SPAC328.06	SPAC6F6.11c	ubp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.085703141	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794106	2542390	2538730	278854	275314	SPAC6F6.11c	SPCC31H12.02c	SPAC6F6.11c	mug73	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.37965365	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794107	2541858	2538939	278348	275514	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC1672.04c	alp13	SPCC1672.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807487104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794108	2541858	2539050	278348	275623	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC11E10.08	alp13	rik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.212854486	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794109	2541858	2539147	278348	275719	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC622.12c	alp13	gdh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.886094156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794110	2541858	2542895	278348	279339	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC13G6.10c	alp13	asl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573521077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794111	2541858	2538961	278348	275535	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC285.14	alp13	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.05135403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794112	2541858	2543617	278348	280031	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC4A8.10	alp13	SPAC4A8.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.954870335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794113	2541858	2542518	278348	278976	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC1B3.16c	alp13	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189334678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794114	2541858	2541512	278348	278013	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC11E3.08c	alp13	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.992720545	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794115	2541858	2540913	278348	277429	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC56F2.08c	alp13	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.314644496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794116	2541858	2542372	278348	278836	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC1F3.03	alp13	SPAC1F3.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.683958129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794117	2541858	2540235	278348	276767	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC336.13c	alp13	SPBC336.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317553549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794118	2541858	2542066	278348	278543	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC227.05	alp13	SPAC227.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514350341	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794119	2541858	2541426	278348	277931	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC227.06	alp13	SPAC227.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.333515288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794120	2541858	2540026	278348	276570	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC16D10.08c	alp13	hsp104	-	SPBC16D10.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.618281983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794121	2541858	2538977	278348	275551	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC1020.06c	alp13	tal1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866136403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794122	2541858	2543064	278348	279497	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC3G6.01	alp13	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.573157735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794123	2541858	2539156	278348	275728	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC1450.08c	alp13	wtf16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.447645025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794124	2541858	2539582	278348	276141	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC594.07c	alp13	bqt3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.07024439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794125	2541858	2542358	278348	278823	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC1782.09c	alp13	clp1	-	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.150608447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794126	2541858	2542293	278348	278761	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC17G8.14c	alp13	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.630697722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794127	2541858	2542378	278348	278842	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC1805.04	alp13	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.479540178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794128	2541858	2543524	278348	279942	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC4D7.07c	alp13	csi2	-	SPAC4D7.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515368108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794129	2541858	2540528	278348	277056	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC18H10.04c	alp13	sce3	-	tif48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.286166924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794130	2541858	2543339	278348	279762	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC630.13c	alp13	tsc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.761055534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794131	2541858	2538993	278348	275567	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC162.12	alp13	tco89	-	SPCC1753.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.946782135	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794132	2541858	2539876	278348	276422	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC1734.07c	alp13	trs8502	-	SPBC1734.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327892261	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794133	2541858	3361561	278348	280637	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC11E3.01c	alp13	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.377708576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794134	2541858	2540296	278348	276827	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC2D10.05	alp13	exg3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.044108291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794135	2541858	2541856	278348	278347	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC23H3.08c	alp13	bub3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.186354734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794136	2541858	2542502	278348	278960	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC139.06	alp13	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.543359899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794137	2541858	2539196	278348	275767	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC1795.03	alp13	gms1	-	gmn3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852634823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794138	2541858	2540694	278348	277218	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC19C7.10	alp13	bqt4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.678722955	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794139	2541858	2542701	278348	279154	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC26H5.05	alp13	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.004338508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794140	2541858	2541771	278348	278265	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC23H3.06	alp13	apl6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.995857924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794141	2541858	2538922	278348	275499	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC16C4.10	alp13	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.63588274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794142	2541858	2542103	278348	278579	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC31G5.11	alp13	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711758383	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794143	2541858	2540491	278348	277019	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC28E12.04	alp13	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.615000177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794144	2541858	2539309	278348	275876	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC4G3.19	alp13	alp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.877651584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794145	2541858	2540664	278348	277189	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC215.02	alp13	bob1	-	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503469534	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794146	2541858	2543320	278348	279744	SPAC23H4.12	SPAPJ695.01c	alp13	SPAPJ695.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.435213458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794147	2541858	2540043	278348	276581	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC1198.12	alp13	mfr1	-	SPBC660.02|fzr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.109046177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794148	2541858	2539226	278348	275796	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC16C4.20c	alp13	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.776664996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794149	2541858	2539420	278348	275985	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC970.07c	alp13	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.967773976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794150	2541858	2542468	278348	278929	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC1D4.09c	alp13	rtf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.06727152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794151	2541858	2539970	278348	276514	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC1773.01	alp13	far8	-	SPBC1773.01|csc3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38449796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794152	2541858	2538847	278348	275428	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC594.06c	alp13	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.043820404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794153	2541858	2539443	278348	276006	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC736.02	alp13	SPCC736.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.311663426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794154	2541858	2541498	278348	278000	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC227.10	alp13	SPAC227.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.48993288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794155	2541858	2539564	278348	276125	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC550.12	alp13	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.058951787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794156	2541858	2542689	278348	279142	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC29B12.04	alp13	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.745788825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794157	2541858	2540945	278348	277461	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC342.06c	alp13	rtt109	-	kat11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.450288999	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794158	2541858	2543453	278348	279873	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC3G9.03	alp13	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.153274388	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794159	2541858	2541026	278348	277541	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC337.09	alp13	erg28	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.995772956	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794160	2541858	2541119	278348	277634	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC651.11c	alp13	apm3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.113627506	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794161	2541858	2541761	278348	278255	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC7D4.12c	alp13	SPAC7D4.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.584594122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794162	2541858	2541998	278348	278482	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC23A1.09	alp13	SPAC23A1.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.635207864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794163	2541858	2540993	278348	277509	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC342.01c	alp13	alg6	-	SPBC3F6.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.76539707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794164	2541858	2542165	278348	278641	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC1782.08c	alp13	rex3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.961627848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794165	2541858	2541323	278348	277835	SPAC23H4.12	SPBP35G2.14	alp13	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.521831886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794166	2541858	2540425	278348	276953	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC27.06c	alp13	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.359200668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794167	2541858	2541424	278348	277929	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC23G3.04	alp13	ies4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.597960004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794168	2541858	2542318	278348	278784	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC16C9.05	alp13	cph1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.19834762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794169	2541858	2539365	278348	275931	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC24B10.16c	alp13	SPCC24B10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.852518419	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794170	2541858	2542023	278348	278506	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC20H4.10	alp13	ufd2	-	SPAC145.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.502647846	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794171	2541858	2541527	278348	278027	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC31A2.09c	alp13	apm4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.510029618	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794172	2541858	2542969	278348	279409	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC4G8.10	alp13	gos1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.689006487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794173	2541858	2542180	278348	278655	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC589.07c	alp13	atg1801	-	atg18|atg18a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984631398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794174	2541858	2540595	278348	277121	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC21C3.02c	alp13	dep1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.822233082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794175	2541858	2541923	278348	278411	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC23C4.09c	alp13	SPAC23C4.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.717285682	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794176	2541858	2539961	278348	276505	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC1198.09	alp13	ubc16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.924921697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794177	2541858	2539244	278348	275814	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC1672.06c	alp13	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.411593983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794178	2541858	2542082	278348	278559	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC29B12.10c	alp13	pgt1	-	opt1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.857254836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794179	2541858	2543426	278348	279846	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC631.02	alp13	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.500938331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794180	2541858	2543078	278348	279511	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC31A2.15c	alp13	dcc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.675640705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794181	2541858	2541484	278348	277986	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC23D3.12	alp13	SPAC23D3.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.112688145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794182	2541858	2538845	278348	275426	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC1235.13	alp13	ght6	-	meu12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.844519983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794183	2541858	2540825	278348	277343	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC428.08c	alp13	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.784063565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794184	2541858	2541926	278348	278414	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC222.14c	alp13	SPAC222.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.069257753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794185	2541858	2541021	278348	277536	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC3B8.10c	alp13	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.976945053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794186	2541858	2542239	278348	278711	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC18G6.02c	alp13	chp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.264970762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794187	2541858	2539098	278348	275670	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC24B10.18	alp13	SPCC24B10.18	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927287117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794188	2541858	2539467	278348	276030	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC417.07c	alp13	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.122498693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794189	2541858	2542260	278348	278729	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC1F12.05	alp13	SPAC1F12.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.114720869	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794190	2541858	2542311	278348	278777	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC16A10.05c	alp13	dad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.926061689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794191	2541858	2543135	278348	279567	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC869.06c	alp13	SPAC869.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.878525337	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794192	2541858	2542596	278348	279050	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC1B3.17	alp13	clr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.050659238	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794193	2541858	2538821	278348	275402	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC584.01c	alp13	SPCC584.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.560310916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794194	2541858	2540631	278348	277157	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC25B2.10	alp13	SPBC25B2.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.830839254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794195	2541858	2542964	278348	279404	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC12G12.07c	alp13	SPAC12G12.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322929496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794196	2541858	2542499	278348	278958	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC1F12.04c	alp13	SPAC1F12.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.651288624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794197	2541858	2541249	278348	277763	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC947.01	alp13	alf1	-	SPBC947.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.632765817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794198	2541858	2540892	278348	277408	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC530.01	alp13	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.699488044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794199	2541858	2542513	278348	278971	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC1952.05	alp13	gcn5	-	kat2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.926919616	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794200	2541858	2543144	278348	279576	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC3F10.05c	alp13	mug113	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.704946567	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794201	2541858	2542707	278348	279160	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC25G10.03	alp13	zip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.62181936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794202	2541858	2540338	278348	276867	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC2G2.13c	alp13	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852070315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794203	2541858	2540922	278348	277438	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC36.10	alp13	SPBC36.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.987006671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794204	2541858	2542123	278348	278599	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC18G6.15	alp13	mal3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.499338117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794205	2541858	2538706	278348	275290	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC338.08	alp13	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.503926746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794206	2541858	2542544	278348	279001	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC18G6.10	alp13	lem2	-	heh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.551224392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794207	2541858	2540352	278348	276881	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC215.03c	alp13	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.260765309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794208	2541858	2540396	278348	276924	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC31F10.12	alp13	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.639333763	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794209	2541858	2540673	278348	277198	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC1D7.03	alp13	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.571210457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794210	2541858	2539046	278348	275619	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC1223.12c	alp13	meu10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874884332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794211	2541858	2540150	278348	276687	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC16E9.14c	alp13	zrg17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.193358036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794212	2541858	2541889	278348	278379	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC2F7.03c	alp13	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.880328264	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794213	2541858	2540886	278348	277403	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC4F6.10	alp13	vps901	-	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.393879291	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794214	2541858	2541911	278348	278401	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC212.04c	alp13	SPAC212.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439787091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794215	2541858	2541496	278348	277998	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC23D3.09	alp13	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.003922991	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794216	2541858	2543667	278348	280081	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC4H3.02c	alp13	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.135133982	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794217	2541858	2539603	278348	276161	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC1289.06c	alp13	ppr8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.146659561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794218	2541858	2539689	278348	276244	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC1861.03	alp13	mak10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.995600849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794219	2541858	2539857	278348	276404	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC1604.20c	alp13	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.911544042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794220	2541858	2541532	278348	278032	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC2C4.15c	alp13	ubx2	-	ucp13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.847956274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794221	2541858	2543643	278348	280057	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC3G9.07c	alp13	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.276570351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794222	2541858	2541899	278348	278389	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC22E12.11c	alp13	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.849267524	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794223	2541858	2542857	278348	279303	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC144.06	alp13	apl5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.640767995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794224	2541858	3361269	278348	280345	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC31A8.01c	alp13	rtn1	-	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.943094198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794225	2541858	2539000	278348	275574	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC1450.06c	alp13	grx3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.016066877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794226	2541858	2540665	278348	277190	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC83.02c	alp13	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.980723056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794227	2541858	2538873	278348	275452	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC306.11	alp13	SPCC306.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.90169558	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794228	2541858	2543244	278348	279672	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC6B12.06c	alp13	rrg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.964227708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794229	2541858	2542976	278348	279414	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC9E9.09c	alp13	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.029309082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794230	2541858	3361569	278348	280645	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC186.04c	alp13	SPAC186.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.464356822	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794231	2541858	2538849	278348	275430	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC330.14c	alp13	rpl2402	-	rpl24-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.745274622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794232	2541858	2541720	278348	278214	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC23H3.13c	alp13	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.061390171	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794233	2541858	2540836	278348	277354	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC18H10.19	alp13	vps38	-	atg14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.876077998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794234	2541858	2543378	278348	279800	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC3H8.07c	alp13	pac10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.888359317	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794235	2541858	2543301	278348	279726	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC977.17	alp13	SPAC977.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.698554259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794236	2541858	2540318	278348	276848	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC30B4.04c	alp13	sol1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.867415712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794237	2541858	2542549	278348	279006	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC19A8.11c	alp13	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.02503258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794238	2541858	2539408	278348	275973	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC576.12c	alp13	mhf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.19227018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794239	2541858	2542519	278348	278977	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC19G12.08	alp13	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.895760214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794240	2541858	5802861	278348	857999	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC1D4.01	alp13	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443310502	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794241	2541858	2539953	278348	276497	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC1709.11c	alp13	png2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.856983364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794242	2541858	2542919	278348	279360	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC6C3.08	alp13	nas6	-	SPAC6C3.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.639055386	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794243	2541858	2543683	278348	280097	SPAC23H4.12	SPAPB1E7.04c	alp13	SPAPB1E7.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.203386621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794244	2541858	2543576	278348	279991	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC4A8.05c	alp13	myp2	-	myo3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.675455795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794245	2541858	2539715	278348	276268	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC1778.09	alp13	SPBC1778.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.625048883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794246	2541858	2540387	278348	276915	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC24C6.04	alp13	SPBC24C6.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.346392945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794247	2541858	2538824	278348	275405	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC1442.14c	alp13	hnt1	-	SPCC1442.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.973686282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794248	2541858	2542008	278348	278491	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC2G11.07c	alp13	ptc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704967725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794249	2541858	2540201	278348	276734	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC13A2.04c	alp13	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.881176636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794250	2541858	2541708	278348	278203	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC31A2.02	alp13	trm112	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.285752394	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794251	2541858	2541464	278348	277966	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC222.08c	alp13	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.120552958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794252	2541858	2540967	278348	277483	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC36B7.08c	alp13	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.187072038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794253	2541858	2541479	278348	277981	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC27F1.06c	alp13	SPAC27F1.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.879745006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794254	2541858	2543517	278348	279935	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC3G9.05	alp13	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.802224318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794255	2541858	2540533	278348	277061	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC29A10.16c	alp13	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.767575916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794256	2541858	2541614	278348	278111	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC29A4.20	alp13	elp3	-	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.559222753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794257	2541858	2539421	278348	275986	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC794.11c	alp13	ent3	-	SPCC794.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.981256054	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794258	2541858	2541488	278348	277990	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC227.17c	alp13	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.625867384	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794259	2541858	2543254	278348	279682	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC1006.03c	alp13	red1	-	iss3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711275505	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794260	2541858	2541742	278348	278236	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC22H10.09	alp13	SPAC22H10.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.214567601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794261	2541858	2538848	278348	275429	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC613.12c	alp13	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.127380849	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794262	2541858	2541017	278348	277532	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC36.07	alp13	elp1	-	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.677869981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794263	2541858	2542875	278348	279320	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC13G7.02c	alp13	ssa1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.200203366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794264	2541858	2540821	278348	277339	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC800.03	alp13	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.048656156	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794265	2541858	2539538	278348	276100	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC364.06	alp13	nap1	-	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.79952226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794266	2541858	2539908	278348	276454	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC13E7.06	alp13	msd1	-	mug172	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.312570508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794267	2541858	2538907	278348	275484	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC24B10.19c	alp13	nts1	-	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.677053208	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794268	2541858	2539160	278348	275732	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC18.17c	alp13	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.933474874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794269	2541858	2541156	278348	277671	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC685.07c	alp13	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.915812779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794270	2541858	2539499	278348	276062	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC622.08c	alp13	hta1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57176222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794271	2541858	2538762	278348	275345	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC306.04c	alp13	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.558876259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794272	2541858	2542327	278348	278793	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC16C9.06c	alp13	upf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.381305856	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794273	2541858	2540619	278348	277145	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC25H2.15	alp13	SPBC25H2.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.869313758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794274	2541858	2539137	278348	275709	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC1682.08c	alp13	mcp2	-	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.572625042	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794275	2541858	2543567	278348	279983	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC890.03	alp13	ppk16	-	mug92	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.696102221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794276	2541858	2540498	278348	277026	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC27.02c	alp13	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.618515102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794277	2541858	2540800	278348	277319	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC409.20c	alp13	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440137371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794278	2541858	2541689	278348	278185	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC24C9.05c	alp13	mug70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.169463018	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794279	2541858	2543304	278348	279728	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC6B12.12	alp13	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.054556148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794280	2541858	2538717	278348	275301	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC1235.02	alp13	bio2	-	SPCC320.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.281840724	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794281	2541858	2541100	278348	277615	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC651.04	alp13	SPBC651.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.223008906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794282	2541858	2541432	278348	277937	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC1F5.05c	alp13	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.842102185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794283	2541858	2540977	278348	277493	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC3E7.02c	alp13	hsp16	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811070173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794284	2541858	2539013	278348	275586	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC364.03	alp13	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.071631628	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794285	2541858	2540829	278348	277347	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC800.09	alp13	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.483893704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794286	2541858	2542418	278348	278881	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC1805.07c	alp13	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.980721759	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794287	2541858	2538916	278348	275493	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC16C4.17	alp13	mug123	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.88154098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794288	2541858	2540677	278348	277202	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC21B10.03c	alp13	ath1	-	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.281256389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794289	2541858	2542326	278348	278792	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC16C9.07	alp13	pom2	-	SPAC2G11.01|mug189|ppk5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197881356	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794290	2541858	2539668	278348	276223	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC11B10.10c	alp13	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.956455958	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794291	2541858	2541380	278348	277891	SPAC23H4.12	SPBPB2B2.13	alp13	gal1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.73628117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794292	2541858	2543602	278348	280017	SPAC23H4.12	SPAPB1A11.04c	alp13	mca1	-	SPAPB1A11.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.548624417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794293	2541858	2539488	278348	276051	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC645.08c	alp13	snd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.644571015	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794294	2541858	2542262	278348	278731	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC17C9.10	alp13	stm1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.463719592	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794295	2541858	2542250	278348	278720	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC17D4.03c	alp13	cis4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.7986176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794296	2541858	2543633	278348	280047	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC3H8.05c	alp13	mms1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.791535377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794297	2541858	2539928	278348	276472	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC1604.08c	alp13	imp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.201150024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794298	2541858	2539205	278348	275775	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC4B3.15	alp13	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.862806885	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794299	2541858	2539375	278348	275941	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC4G3.11	alp13	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.479482499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794300	2541858	2539189	278348	275760	SPAC23H4.12	SPCC1682.16	alp13	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.550854549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794301	2541858	2541238	278348	277752	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC8E4.05c	alp13	SPBC8E4.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.319774588	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794302	2541858	2542716	278348	279169	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC25H1.07	alp13	emc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.555098339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794303	2541858	2539700	278348	276253	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC1685.15c	alp13	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.189897549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794304	2541858	2541675	278348	278171	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC22F8.12c	alp13	shf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.442196387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794305	2541858	2543387	278348	279809	SPAC23H4.12	SPAPB1E7.02c	alp13	mcl1	-	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.531131259	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794306	2541858	2543327	278348	279750	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC1D4.06c	alp13	csk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873432495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794307	2541858	2543070	278348	279503	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC2H10.02c	alp13	SPAC2H10.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.915114509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794308	2541858	2540558	278348	277085	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC2D10.17	alp13	clr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.158413746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794309	2541858	2540481	278348	277009	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC2D10.12	alp13	rhp23	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.234725345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794310	2541858	2542424	278348	278886	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC1805.14	alp13	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.641033895	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794311	2541858	2541869	278348	278359	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC22F3.13	alp13	tsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.002494001	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794312	2541858	2541478	278348	277980	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC2F7.17	alp13	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.631882939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794313	2541858	2542700	278348	279153	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC26H5.08c	alp13	bgl2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.503480121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794314	2541858	2543333	278348	279756	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC694.02	alp13	SPAC694.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.215704099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794315	2541858	2543090	278348	279523	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC1348.01	alp13	SPBC1348.01	-	SPAC1348.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.927887929	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794316	2541858	2542656	278348	279110	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC2E1P3.05c	alp13	SPAC2E1P3.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389772586	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794317	2541858	2541272	278348	277786	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC947.03c	alp13	naa38	-	mak31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.576109147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794318	2541858	2542943	278348	279384	SPAC23H4.12	SPBC1348.03	alp13	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.120674551	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794319	2541858	2542561	278348	279017	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC31G5.17c	alp13	rps1001	-	rps10-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.803153977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794320	2541858	2542617	278348	279071	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC13A11.01c	alp13	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.094327996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794321	2541858	2542879	278348	279324	SPAC23H4.12	SPAC13G7.07	alp13	arb2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.498664867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794322	2540787	2542207	277306	278682	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC17H9.10c	sgf29	ddb1	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.479152465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794323	2540787	2540060	277306	276598	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC106.01	sgf29	mph1	SPBC21D10.13	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.32683787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794324	2540787	2542143	277306	278619	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC17C9.07	sgf29	alg8	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.066573795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794325	2540787	2543152	277306	279584	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC869.03c	sgf29	SPAC869.03c	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818732635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794326	2540787	2542812	277306	279259	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC6F6.01	sgf29	cch1	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.254720402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794327	2540787	2541818	277306	278309	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC11G7.02	sgf29	pub1	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.220528081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794328	2540787	2543064	277306	279497	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC3G6.01	sgf29	hrp3	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.899448561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794329	2540787	2542358	277306	278823	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC1782.09c	sgf29	clp1	SPBC21D10.13	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.206319497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794330	2540787	2542293	277306	278761	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC17G8.14c	sgf29	pck1	SPBC21D10.13	SPAC22H10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.982602303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794331	2540787	2540528	277306	277056	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC18H10.04c	sgf29	sce3	SPBC21D10.13	tif48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.368988943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794332	2540787	2538993	277306	275567	SPBC1921.07c	SPCC162.12	sgf29	tco89	SPBC21D10.13	SPCC1753.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.818617963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794333	2540787	2538896	277306	275474	SPBC1921.07c	SPCC584.11c	sgf29	SPCC584.11c	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.197592504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794334	2540787	2541135	277306	277650	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC839.03c	sgf29	SPBC839.03c	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.773711433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794335	2540787	2539930	277306	276474	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC1198.11c	sgf29	reb1	SPBC21D10.13	SPBC660.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.145380056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794336	2540787	2540068	277306	276606	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC1734.12c	sgf29	alg12	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.374583547	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794337	2540787	2542098	277306	278574	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC30D11.01c	sgf29	gto2	SPBC21D10.13	SPAC30D11.01c|SPAC56F8.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.410542296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794338	2540787	2540161	277306	276696	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC13E7.03c	sgf29	SPBC13E7.03c	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.188902899	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794339	2540787	2541345	277306	277856	SPBC1921.07c	SPBP35G2.07	sgf29	ilv1	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.413206094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794340	2540787	5802967	277306	858105	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC20G4.08	sgf29	pdc1	SPBC21D10.13	SPAC20G4.08|SPAC4F10.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094996941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794341	2540787	2543432	277306	279852	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC4G8.05	sgf29	ppk14	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.934727299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794342	2540787	2542701	277306	279154	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC26H5.05	sgf29	mga2	SPBC21D10.13	SPAC26H5.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321069324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794343	2540787	2543320	277306	279744	SPBC1921.07c	SPAPJ695.01c	sgf29	SPAPJ695.01c	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.608727276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794344	2540787	2539332	277306	275898	SPBC1921.07c	SPCPB1C11.01	sgf29	amt1	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.819683102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794345	2540787	2540975	277306	277491	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC354.12	sgf29	gpd3	SPBC21D10.13	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577310607	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794346	2540787	2539420	277306	275985	SPBC1921.07c	SPCC970.07c	sgf29	raf2	SPBC21D10.13	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.024306096	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794347	2540787	2542689	277306	279142	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC29B12.04	sgf29	snz1	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.806885668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794348	2540787	2542555	277306	279012	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC1952.06c	sgf29	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.360466169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794349	2540787	2539797	277306	276347	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC16G5.14c	sgf29	rps3	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.446652787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794350	2540787	2543636	277306	280050	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC3H8.08c	sgf29	SPAC3H8.08c	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096825129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794351	2540787	2542012	277306	278495	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC23C11.02c	sgf29	rps23	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699357293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794352	2540787	2541538	277306	278038	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC24B11.08c	sgf29	SPAC24B11.08c	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.9904381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794353	2540787	2542277	277306	278746	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC17A5.02c	sgf29	dbr1	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.181210154	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794354	2540787	2542180	277306	278655	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC589.07c	sgf29	atg1801	SPBC21D10.13	atg18|atg18a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.506217024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794355	2540787	2539441	277306	276004	SPBC1921.07c	SPCPJ732.02c	sgf29	xks1	SPBC21D10.13	SPCPJ732.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.199055282	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794356	2540787	2540595	277306	277121	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC21C3.02c	sgf29	dep1	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.82074931	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794357	2540787	2541905	277306	278395	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC6G9.01c	sgf29	SPAC6G9.01c	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.378588117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794358	2540787	2539100	277306	275672	SPBC1921.07c	SPCC330.12c	sgf29	sdh3	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981462573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794359	2540787	2542530	277306	278988	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC1399.02	sgf29	SPAC1399.02	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.3866433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794360	2540787	2538906	277306	275483	SPBC1921.07c	SPCC1259.03	sgf29	rpa12	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.218421901	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794361	2540787	2542981	277306	279419	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC824.02	sgf29	bst1	SPBC21D10.13	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.41794872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794362	2540787	2542331	277306	278797	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC1834.05	sgf29	alg9	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514730526	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794363	2540787	2539388	277306	275953	SPBC1921.07c	SPCC24B10.12	sgf29	cgi121	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.501425475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794364	2540787	2543020	277306	279456	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC10F6.13c	sgf29	SPAC10F6.13c	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.874159231	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794365	2540787	2541800	277306	278291	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC732.02c	sgf29	SPAC732.02c	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.859272194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794366	2540787	2542646	277306	279100	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC11H11.05c	sgf29	fta6	SPBC21D10.13	sma6	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637607108	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794367	2540787	2542507	277306	278965	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC18G6.13	sgf29	SPAC18G6.13	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.10171102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794368	2540787	2541578	277306	278075	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC25B8.05	sgf29	deg1	SPBC21D10.13	SPAC25B8.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984713732	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794369	2540787	2542168	277306	278643	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC17A5.16	sgf29	ftp105	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.767094458	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794370	2540787	2539999	277306	276543	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC1734.15	sgf29	rsc4	SPBC21D10.13	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.3254274	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794371	2540787	2541496	277306	277998	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC23D3.09	sgf29	arp42	SPBC21D10.13	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.204194825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794372	2540787	2541166	277306	277681	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC725.15	sgf29	ura5	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.941867037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794373	2540787	2539689	277306	276244	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC1861.03	sgf29	mak10	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.989189106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794374	2540787	2543245	277306	279673	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC56F8.06c	sgf29	alg10	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.839761844	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794375	2540787	2539857	277306	276404	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC1604.20c	sgf29	tea2	SPBC21D10.13	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.47678401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794376	2540787	2543643	277306	280057	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC3G9.07c	sgf29	hos2	SPBC21D10.13	hda1|phd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455878269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794377	2540787	2541899	277306	278389	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC22E12.11c	sgf29	set3	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.950561224	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794378	2540787	2543396	277306	279818	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC4D7.11	sgf29	dsc4	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.784055218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794379	2540787	2538769	277306	275352	SPBC1921.07c	SPCC126.04c	sgf29	sgf73	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.123468312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794380	2540787	2539667	277306	276222	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC13G1.08c	sgf29	ash2	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.664887019	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794381	2540787	2542032	277306	278514	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC23C11.04c	sgf29	pnk1	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.012941983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794382	2540787	2542014	277306	278497	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC20H4.04	sgf29	fml2	SPBC21D10.13	mfh2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.081500382	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794383	2540787	2540394	277306	276922	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC2D10.09	sgf29	snr1	SPBC21D10.13	SPBC2D10.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.978807044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794384	2540787	2541903	277306	278393	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC22F8.05	sgf29	SPAC22F8.05	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.995542348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794385	2540787	2540836	277306	277354	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC18H10.19	sgf29	vps38	SPBC21D10.13	atg14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874494945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794386	2540787	2540077	277306	276615	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC17D11.04c	sgf29	nto1	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.736517721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794387	2540787	2542254	277306	278724	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC30D11.04c	sgf29	nup124	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.848362142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794388	2540787	2542214	277306	278688	SPBC1921.07c	SPACUNK4.11c	sgf29	mpp6	SPBC21D10.13	SPACUNK4.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193696075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794389	2540787	2542549	277306	279006	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC19A8.11c	sgf29	SPAC19A8.11c	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.911933398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794390	2540787	2539953	277306	276497	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC1709.11c	sgf29	png2	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.169764722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794391	2540787	2543080	277306	279513	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC3A11.10c	sgf29	SPAC3A11.10c	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871777565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794392	2540787	2540094	277306	276632	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC146.10	sgf29	mug57	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.865772078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794393	2540787	2540342	277306	276871	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC2G2.01c	sgf29	liz1	SPBC21D10.13	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.74278053	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794394	2540787	2541053	277306	277568	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC56F2.10c	sgf29	alg5	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.490553646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794395	2540787	2540589	277306	277115	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC20F10.06	sgf29	mad2	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200585309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794396	2540787	2541762	277306	278256	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC139.01c	sgf29	SPAC139.01c	SPBC21D10.13	SPAC955.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.079975992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794397	2540787	2541713	277306	278208	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC3A12.12	sgf29	atp11	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.663922016	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794398	2540787	2542170	277306	278645	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC17G8.13c	sgf29	mst2	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.931773945	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794399	2540787	2539706	277306	276259	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC16G5.13	sgf29	ptf2	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.142615757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794400	2540787	2543619	277306	280033	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC4F10.04	sgf29	ypa1	SPBC21D10.13	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.313446284	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794401	2540787	2541175	277306	277689	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC839.13c	sgf29	rpl1601	SPBC21D10.13	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.348825734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794402	2540787	2541909	277306	278399	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC227.01c	sgf29	erd1	SPBC21D10.13	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.38990926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794403	2540787	2539108	277306	275680	SPBC1921.07c	SPCC1223.02	sgf29	nmt1	SPBC21D10.13	thi3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.508945066	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794404	2540787	2542883	277306	279328	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC1486.04c	sgf29	alm1	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.8736038	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794405	2540787	2542915	277306	279357	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC6C3.06c	sgf29	SPAC6C3.06c	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813272323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794406	2540787	2539030	277306	275603	SPBC1921.07c	SPCP1E11.02	sgf29	ppk38	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.556859008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794407	2540787	2540800	277306	277319	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC409.20c	sgf29	psh3	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.924650823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794408	2540787	2543304	277306	279728	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC6B12.12	sgf29	tom70	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.73704128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794409	2540787	2538966	277306	275540	SPBC1921.07c	SPCC18.10	sgf29	SPCC18.10	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.299620751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794410	2540787	2543160	277306	279591	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC31A2.14	sgf29	bun107	SPBC21D10.13	wdr48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328975977	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794411	2540787	2542075	277306	278552	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC27D7.06	sgf29	etf1	SPBC21D10.13	SPAC27D7.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.722332663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794412	2540787	2541100	277306	277615	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC651.04	sgf29	SPBC651.04	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.730020217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794413	2540787	2538756	277306	275339	SPBC1921.07c	SPCC1795.10c	sgf29	SPCC1795.10c	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.826095992	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794414	2540787	2541531	277306	278031	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC25A8.01c	sgf29	fft3	SPBC21D10.13	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.387873734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794415	2540787	2540677	277306	277202	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC21B10.03c	sgf29	ath1	SPBC21D10.13	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.646808875	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794416	2540787	2543437	277306	279857	SPBC1921.07c	SPAPB1A10.14	sgf29	pof15	SPBC21D10.13	SPAPB1A10.14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.514224352	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794417	2540787	2542826	277306	279273	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC13G6.09	sgf29	SPAC13G6.09	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.270357345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794418	2540787	2540569	277306	277096	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC660.17c	sgf29	SPBC660.17c	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636809879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794419	2540787	2541789	277306	278281	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC23H4.08	sgf29	iwr1	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.385516269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794420	2540787	2539488	277306	276051	SPBC1921.07c	SPCC645.08c	sgf29	snd1	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.771748879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794421	2540787	2541115	277306	277630	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC660.07	sgf29	ntp1	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.936821332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794422	2540787	2543633	277306	280047	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC3H8.05c	sgf29	mms1	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.496763245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794423	2540787	2539702	277306	276255	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC1604.12	sgf29	SPBC1604.12	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152050967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794424	2540787	3361117	277306	280193	SPBC1921.07c	SPCC663.17	sgf29	wtf15	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.659892975	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794425	2540787	2539726	277306	276278	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC13E7.08c	sgf29	leo1	SPBC21D10.13	SPBC13E7.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.881806591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794426	2540787	2541941	277306	278428	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC20H4.03c	sgf29	tfs1	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.763542652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794427	2540787	2539700	277306	276253	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC1685.15c	sgf29	klp6	SPBC21D10.13	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.13045606	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794428	2540787	2538854	277306	275435	SPBC1921.07c	SPCP1E11.05c	sgf29	are2	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811833221	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794429	2540787	2540173	277306	276706	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC106.13	sgf29	SPBC106.13	SPBC21D10.13	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.430354364	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794430	2540787	2543087	277306	279520	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC30C2.04	sgf29	SPAC30C2.04	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094279585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794431	2540787	2542399	277306	278863	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC1805.10	sgf29	SPAC1805.10	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09216342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794432	2540787	2538947	277306	275521	SPBC1921.07c	SPCC1682.12c	sgf29	ubp16	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869064863	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794433	2540787	2542656	277306	279110	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC2E1P3.05c	sgf29	SPAC2E1P3.05c	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86766593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794434	2540787	2540208	277306	276741	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC9B6.03	sgf29	SPBC9B6.03	SPBC21D10.13	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934817973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794435	2540787	2542617	277306	279071	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC13A11.01c	sgf29	rga8	SPBC21D10.13	SPAC2F7.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.544733229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794436	2540787	2542571	277306	279027	SPBC1921.07c	SPAC589.02c	sgf29	med13	SPBC21D10.13	spTrap240|srb9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.042217139	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794437	2539314	2539050	275880	275623	SPCC548.05c	SPCC11E10.08	dbl5	rik1	SPCC548.05c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.846691226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794438	2539314	2543529	275880	279947	SPCC548.05c	SPAC4C5.02c	dbl5	ryh1	SPCC548.05c	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.119493032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794439	2539314	2542443	275880	278905	SPCC548.05c	SPAC17G6.13	dbl5	slt1	SPCC548.05c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451453404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794440	2539314	2540834	275880	277352	SPCC548.05c	SPBC18H10.18c	dbl5	SPBC18H10.18c	SPCC548.05c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.440195335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794441	2539314	2542177	275880	278652	SPCC548.05c	SPAC17H9.08	dbl5	SPAC17H9.08	SPCC548.05c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153365105	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794442	2539314	2542513	275880	278971	SPCC548.05c	SPAC1952.05	dbl5	gcn5	SPCC548.05c	kat2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.613364125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794443	2539314	2543396	275880	279818	SPCC548.05c	SPAC4D7.11	dbl5	dsc4	SPCC548.05c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.240093098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794444	2539314	2540498	275880	277026	SPCC548.05c	SPBC27.02c	dbl5	ask1	SPCC548.05c	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.207667116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794445	2539314	2542418	275880	278881	SPCC548.05c	SPAC1805.07c	dbl5	dad2	SPCC548.05c	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.617974581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794446	2539314	2542635	275880	279089	SPCC548.05c	SPAC24H6.09	dbl5	gef1	SPCC548.05c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.988147716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794447	2539314	2540320	275880	276850	SPCC548.05c	SPBC3D6.04c	dbl5	mad1	SPCC548.05c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.188962294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794448	2542119	2538961	278595	275535	SPAC1834.08	SPCC285.14	mak1	trs130	phk3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.187675152	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794449	2542119	2541650	278595	278146	SPAC1834.08	SPAC14C4.12c	mak1	laf1	phk3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.361950591	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794450	2542119	2542816	278595	279263	SPAC1834.08	SPAC4G8.11c	mak1	atp10	phk3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708198539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794451	2542119	2539117	278595	275689	SPAC1834.08	SPCC74.06	mak1	mak3	phk3	phk2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.129361701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794452	2542119	2539937	278595	276481	SPAC1834.08	SPBC1539.08	mak1	arf6	phk3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.935234065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794453	2542119	2540595	278595	277121	SPAC1834.08	SPBC21C3.02c	mak1	dep1	phk3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391091248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794454	2542119	2542983	278595	279421	SPAC1834.08	SPAC11D3.15	mak1	SPAC11D3.15	phk3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.885341836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794455	2542119	2538800	278595	275381	SPAC1834.08	SPCC1322.06	mak1	kap113	phk3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.599806659	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794456	2542119	2543510	278595	279928	SPAC1834.08	SPAC30D11.07	mak1	nth1	phk3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.837413807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794457	2542119	2539281	278595	275849	SPAC1834.08	SPCC132.03	mak1	SPCC132.03	phk3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935630393	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794458	2542119	2541166	278595	277681	SPAC1834.08	SPBC725.15	mak1	ura5	phk3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.392374041	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794459	2542119	2542398	278595	278862	SPAC1834.08	SPAC1805.03c	mak1	trm13	phk3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.399671242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794460	2542119	2539043	278595	275616	SPAC1834.08	SPCC1235.08c	mak1	pdh1	phk3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820014278	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794461	2542119	2540533	278595	277061	SPAC1834.08	SPBC29A10.16c	mak1	SPBC29A10.16c	phk3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.850926672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794462	2542119	2541713	278595	278208	SPAC1834.08	SPAC3A12.12	mak1	atp11	phk3	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.84611996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794463	2542119	3361389	278595	280465	SPAC1834.08	SPAC977.13c	mak1	SPAC977.13c	phk3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.850878819	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794464	2542119	2541175	278595	277689	SPAC1834.08	SPBC839.13c	mak1	rpl1601	phk3	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.140341864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794465	2542119	2541121	278595	277636	SPAC1834.08	SPBC609.03	mak1	iqw1	phk3	iqwd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992626923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794466	2542119	2543304	278595	279728	SPAC1834.08	SPAC6B12.12	mak1	tom70	phk3	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.926381149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794467	2542119	2541531	278595	278031	SPAC1834.08	SPAC25A8.01c	mak1	fft3	phk3	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.660353702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794468	2542119	2541229	278595	277743	SPAC1834.08	SPBC839.05c	mak1	rps1701	phk3	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323243398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794469	2542119	2540146	278595	276683	SPAC1834.08	SPBC17A3.06	mak1	SPBC17A3.06	phk3	pi040	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.594965197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794470	2543616	2543529	280030	279947	SPAC4A8.09c	SPAC4C5.02c	cwf21	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.772381672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794471	2543616	2540975	280030	277491	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC354.12	cwf21	gpd3	-	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.432437905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794472	2543616	2542468	280030	278929	SPAC4A8.09c	SPAC1D4.09c	cwf21	rtf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.653619296	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794473	2543616	2541208	280030	277722	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC887.04c	cwf21	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.311124867	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794474	2543616	2542135	280030	278611	SPAC4A8.09c	SPAC13A11.04c	cwf21	ubp8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808005033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794475	2543616	2542318	280030	278784	SPAC4A8.09c	SPAC16C9.05	cwf21	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.552407254	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794476	2543616	2542969	280030	279409	SPAC4A8.09c	SPAC4G8.10	cwf21	gos1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.974127075	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794477	2543616	2543641	280030	280055	SPAC4A8.09c	SPAC3H5.08c	cwf21	SPAC3H5.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379966842	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794478	2543616	3361543	280030	280619	SPAC4A8.09c	SPAC9.13c	cwf21	cwf16	-	SPAPJ735.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.978519793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794479	2543616	2541021	280030	277536	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC3B8.10c	cwf21	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.051357922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794480	2543616	2542554	280030	279011	SPAC4A8.09c	SPAC1952.03	cwf21	otu2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513461779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794481	2543616	2542268	280030	278737	SPAC4A8.09c	SPAC17A5.07c	cwf21	ulp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.185544643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794482	2543616	2539898	280030	276444	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC12D12.07c	cwf21	trx2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.831963449	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794483	2543616	2541889	280030	278379	SPAC4A8.09c	SPAC2F7.03c	cwf21	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.624809355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794484	2543616	2540886	280030	277403	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC4F6.10	cwf21	vps901	-	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.120173632	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794485	2543616	2540086	280030	276624	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC16H5.12c	cwf21	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980581113	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794486	2543616	2539293	280030	275861	SPAC4A8.09c	SPCC553.08c	cwf21	ria1	-	SPCC553.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.418693455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794487	2543616	2541187	280030	277701	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC776.14	cwf21	plh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.257346287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794488	2543616	2541828	280030	278319	SPAC4A8.09c	SPAC22H12.05c	cwf21	fsc1	-	SPAC22H12.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63976125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794489	2543616	2542946	280030	279386	SPAC4A8.09c	SPAC6F12.03c	cwf21	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.187413997	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794490	2543616	2540836	280030	277354	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC18H10.19	cwf21	vps38	-	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.108161438	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794491	2543616	2538708	280030	275292	SPAC4A8.09c	SPCC594.01	cwf21	SPCC594.01	-	SPCC736.16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.128333692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794492	2543616	2540533	280030	277061	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC29A10.16c	cwf21	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.399199445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794493	2543616	2539527	280030	276089	SPAC4A8.09c	SPCC338.16	cwf21	pof3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.399937765	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794494	2543616	2540930	280030	277446	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC354.10	cwf21	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.69404422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794495	2543616	2539519	280030	276081	SPAC4A8.09c	SPCC364.05	cwf21	vps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.561106582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794496	2543616	2541017	280030	277532	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC36.07	cwf21	elp1	-	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.862547971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794497	2543616	2538762	280030	275345	SPAC4A8.09c	SPCC306.04c	cwf21	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.31244226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794498	2543616	2543628	280030	280042	SPAC4A8.09c	SPAC3H8.10	cwf21	spo20	-	sec14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256300751	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794499	2543616	2540829	280030	277347	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC800.09	cwf21	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.313536319	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794500	2543616	2539668	280030	276223	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC11B10.10c	cwf21	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.846831061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794501	2543616	2540927	280030	277443	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC365.06	cwf21	pmt3	-	smt3|ubl2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.431952744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794502	2543616	2540936	280030	277452	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC800.05c	cwf21	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.561598134	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794503	2543616	2539205	280030	275775	SPAC4A8.09c	SPCC4B3.15	cwf21	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.682473981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794504	2543616	3361511	280030	280587	SPAC4A8.09c	SPAC23C4.08	cwf21	rho3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.398340033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794505	2543616	5802702	280030	857840	SPAC4A8.09c	SPCC1235.15	cwf21	dga1	-	SPCC548.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.255201109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794506	2543616	2540125	280030	276662	SPAC4A8.09c	SPBC16C6.01c	cwf21	SPBC16C6.01c	-	SPBC543.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153561902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794507	2543616	2538854	280030	275435	SPAC4A8.09c	SPCP1E11.05c	cwf21	are2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.846227583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794508	2540764	2540279	277284	276810	SPBC19C7.02	SPBC3B8.04c	ubr1	SPBC3B8.04c	SPBC32F12.14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.931462489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794509	2540764	2543529	277284	279947	SPBC19C7.02	SPAC4C5.02c	ubr1	ryh1	SPBC32F12.14	hos1|sat7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.139519123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794510	2540764	2541426	277284	277931	SPBC19C7.02	SPAC227.06	ubr1	SPAC227.06	SPBC32F12.14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.837161422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794511	2540764	2540198	277284	276731	SPBC19C7.02	SPBC1709.04c	ubr1	cyp3	SPBC32F12.14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508542786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794512	2540764	2542502	277284	278960	SPBC19C7.02	SPAC139.06	ubr1	hat1	SPBC32F12.14	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043532746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794513	2540764	2541771	277284	278265	SPBC19C7.02	SPAC23H3.06	ubr1	apl6	SPBC32F12.14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645451048	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794514	2540764	3361436	277284	280512	SPBC19C7.02	SPAC1296.01c	ubr1	SPAC1296.01c	SPBC32F12.14	SPAC22F3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.837309289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794515	2540764	2540375	277284	276904	SPBC19C7.02	SPBC2G2.06c	ubr1	apl1	SPBC32F12.14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.646522518	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794516	2540764	2541235	277284	277749	SPBC19C7.02	SPBC8D2.12c	ubr1	SPBC8D2.12c	SPBC32F12.14	pI053	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925862989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794517	2540764	2539935	277284	276479	SPBC19C7.02	SPBC13G1.04c	ubr1	abh1	SPBC32F12.14	SPBC13G1.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511172733	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794518	2540764	2539129	277284	275701	SPBC19C7.02	SPCC338.14	ubr1	ado1	SPBC32F12.14	SPCC338.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.978214329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794519	2540764	2541926	277284	278414	SPBC19C7.02	SPAC222.14c	ubr1	SPAC222.14c	SPBC32F12.14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.814841342	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794520	2540764	2540150	277284	276687	SPBC19C7.02	SPBC16E9.14c	ubr1	zrg17	SPBC32F12.14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.509155056	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794521	2540764	2542971	277284	279410	SPBC19C7.02	SPAC105.02c	ubr1	SPAC105.02c	SPBC32F12.14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.440323418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794522	2540764	2541388	277284	277899	SPBC19C7.02	SPBP8B7.30c	ubr1	thi5	SPBC32F12.14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.261333626	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794523	2540764	2542519	277284	278977	SPBC19C7.02	SPAC19G12.08	ubr1	scs7	SPBC32F12.14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699237433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794524	2540764	2540776	277284	277296	SPBC19C7.02	SPBC428.07	ubr1	meu6	SPBC32F12.14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451770884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794525	2540764	2542597	277284	279051	SPBC19C7.02	SPAP8A3.07c	ubr1	SPAP8A3.07c	SPBC32F12.14	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.414840453	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794526	2540764	2543350	277284	279772	SPBC19C7.02	SPAC56E4.03	ubr1	SPAC56E4.03	SPBC32F12.14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.582547538	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794527	2540764	2541614	277284	278111	SPBC19C7.02	SPAC29A4.20	ubr1	elp3	SPBC32F12.14	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.921378789	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794528	2540764	2542255	277284	278725	SPBC19C7.02	SPAC57A7.08	ubr1	pzh1	SPBC32F12.14	phz1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039242081	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794529	2540764	2539993	277284	276537	SPBC19C7.02	SPBC1105.05	ubr1	exg1	SPBC32F12.14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.249262039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794530	2540764	2541222	277284	277736	SPBC19C7.02	SPBC887.08	ubr1	SPBC887.08	SPBC32F12.14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.84809836	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794531	2540764	2543071	277284	279504	SPBC19C7.02	SPAC3C7.06c	ubr1	pit1	SPBC32F12.14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.45120635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794532	2540764	2542883	277284	279328	SPBC19C7.02	SPAC1486.04c	ubr1	alm1	SPBC32F12.14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.573830226	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794533	2540764	2542458	277284	278919	SPBC19C7.02	SPAC30.02c	ubr1	SPAC30.02c	SPBC32F12.14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.982226415	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794534	2540764	2542693	277284	279146	SPBC19C7.02	SPAC27D7.09c	ubr1	SPAC27D7.09c	SPBC32F12.14	SPAC27D7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.702038522	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794535	2540764	3361511	277284	280587	SPBC19C7.02	SPAC23C4.08	ubr1	rho3	SPBC32F12.14	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.076003034	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794536	2540764	2541062	277284	277577	SPBC19C7.02	SPBC660.11	ubr1	tcg1	SPBC32F12.14	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.196160938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794537	2542902	2541912	279346	278402	SPAC144.05	SPAC222.16c	SPAC144.05	csn3	-	SPAC821.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.094167298	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794538	2542902	2543527	279346	279945	SPAC144.05	SPAC4C5.01	SPAC144.05	SPAC4C5.01	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.076013892	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794539	2542902	2542345	279346	278811	SPAC144.05	SPAC1705.02	SPAC144.05	SPAC1705.02	-	SPAC1F2.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.69751392	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794540	2542902	2541058	279346	277573	SPAC144.05	SPBC3H7.09	SPAC144.05	erf2	-	mug142	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.815576456	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794541	2542902	2539564	279346	276125	SPAC144.05	SPCC550.12	SPAC144.05	arp6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196894702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794542	2542902	2540919	279346	277435	SPAC144.05	SPBC543.07	SPAC144.05	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.162626153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794543	2542902	2542530	279346	278988	SPAC144.05	SPAC1399.02	SPAC144.05	SPAC1399.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.766560219	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794544	2542902	2541249	279346	277763	SPAC144.05	SPBC947.01	SPAC144.05	alf1	-	SPBC947.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.692262902	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794545	2542902	2541735	279346	278229	SPAC144.05	SPAC7D4.04	SPAC144.05	atg11	-	taf1|cvt9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.620298078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794546	2542902	2542659	279346	279112	SPAC144.05	SPAC25B8.08	SPAC144.05	SPAC25B8.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036428159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794547	2542902	2541388	279346	277899	SPAC144.05	SPBP8B7.30c	SPAC144.05	thi5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.514798032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794548	2542902	2541900	279346	278390	SPAC144.05	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC144.05	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.608856791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794549	2542902	2542549	279346	279006	SPAC144.05	SPAC19A8.11c	SPAC144.05	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87735698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794550	2542902	2539715	279346	276268	SPAC144.05	SPBC1778.09	SPAC144.05	SPBC1778.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.088936757	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794551	2542902	2539052	279346	275625	SPAC144.05	SPCC663.09c	SPAC144.05	SPCC663.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.001056703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794552	2542902	2543390	279346	279812	SPAC144.05	SPAC631.01c	SPAC144.05	acp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.568046786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794553	2542902	2542453	279346	278914	SPAC144.05	SPAC186.01	SPAC144.05	pfl9	-	SPAC186.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.55350826	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794554	2542902	2541628	279346	278124	SPAC144.05	SPAC110.02	SPAC144.05	pds5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.336485199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794555	2542902	2543113	279346	279545	SPAC144.05	SPAC3F10.07c	SPAC144.05	erf4	-	mug91	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101388187	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794556	2542902	2538762	279346	275345	SPAC144.05	SPCC306.04c	SPAC144.05	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.836627308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794557	2542902	2543106	279346	279538	SPAC144.05	SPAC3A11.13	SPAC144.05	SPAC3A11.13	-	SPAC3H5.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.843062861	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794558	2542902	2540498	279346	277026	SPAC144.05	SPBC27.02c	SPAC144.05	ask1	-	mug181	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.362385769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794559	2542902	2538717	279346	275301	SPAC144.05	SPCC1235.02	SPAC144.05	bio2	-	SPCC320.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.813087401	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794560	2542902	2543136	279346	279568	SPAC144.05	SPBC1348.07	SPAC144.05	SPBC1348.07	-	SPAC1348.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095376436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794561	2542902	2538714	279346	275298	SPAC144.05	SPCC330.11	SPAC144.05	btb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.539023373	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794562	2542902	2542418	279346	278881	SPAC144.05	SPAC1805.07c	SPAC144.05	dad2	-	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986257598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794563	2542902	2538916	279346	275493	SPAC144.05	SPCC16C4.17	SPAC144.05	mug123	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.094438043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794564	2542902	2542574	279346	279030	SPAC144.05	SPAC186.05c	SPAC144.05	SPAC186.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.102822114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794565	2542902	2540380	279346	276909	SPAC144.05	SPBC1A4.05	SPAC144.05	blt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.880883324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794566	2542902	2538861	279346	275441	SPAC144.05	SPCC1620.11	SPAC144.05	nup97	-	mug87	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.350495145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794567	2542902	2542656	279346	279110	SPAC144.05	SPAC2E1P3.05c	SPAC144.05	SPAC2E1P3.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924601229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794568	2542902	2539001	279346	275575	SPAC144.05	SPCC1494.08c	SPAC144.05	SPCC1494.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04150045	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794569	2541121	2540060	277636	276598	SPBC609.03	SPBC106.01	iqw1	mph1	iqwd1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.937627354	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794570	2541121	2542598	277636	279052	SPBC609.03	SPAC6G10.08	iqw1	idp1	iqwd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.257264416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794571	2541121	2543432	277636	279852	SPBC609.03	SPAC4G8.05	iqw1	ppk14	iqwd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.945687145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794572	2541121	2542816	277636	279263	SPBC609.03	SPAC4G8.11c	iqw1	atp10	iqwd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038285089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794573	2541121	2538801	277636	275382	SPBC609.03	SPCC285.13c	iqw1	nup60	iqwd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.030584339	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794574	2541121	2540929	277636	277445	SPBC609.03	SPBC354.03	iqw1	swd3	iqwd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.41134457	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794575	2541121	2540425	277636	276953	SPBC609.03	SPBC27.06c	iqw1	mgr2	iqwd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983451229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794576	2541121	2542277	277636	278746	SPBC609.03	SPAC17A5.02c	iqw1	dbr1	iqwd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.436784067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794577	2541121	2540415	277636	276943	SPBC609.03	SPBC30B4.06c	iqw1	SPBC30B4.06c	iqwd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.551736587	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794578	2541121	2539845	277636	276393	SPBC609.03	SPBC12C2.02c	iqw1	ste20	iqwd1	ste16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098677859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794579	2541121	2542755	277636	279205	SPBC609.03	SPAC1687.10	iqw1	mcp1	iqwd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.322912911	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794580	2541121	2542008	277636	278491	SPBC609.03	SPAC2G11.07c	iqw1	ptc3	iqwd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.747390324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794581	2541121	2541337	277636	277848	SPBC609.03	SPBP35G2.13c	iqw1	swc2	iqwd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.090139729	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794582	2541121	2540918	277636	277434	SPBC609.03	SPBC800.02	iqw1	whi5	iqwd1	mug54	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.822224465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794583	2541121	2538762	277636	275345	SPBC609.03	SPCC306.04c	iqw1	set1	iqwd1	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.355690039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794584	2541121	2542119	277636	278595	SPBC609.03	SPAC1834.08	iqw1	mak1	iqwd1	phk3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992626923	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794585	2541121	2542094	277636	278571	SPBC609.03	SPAC29B12.06c	iqw1	rcd1	iqwd1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.01181809	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794586	2541121	2541297	277636	277809	SPBC609.03	SPBC9B6.07	iqw1	nop52	iqwd1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091827959	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794587	2542021	2539050	278504	275623	SPAP14E8.02	SPCC11E10.08	tos4	rik1	SPAP14E8.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.884030269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794588	2542021	2542895	278504	279339	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC13G6.10c	tos4	asl1	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.38365169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794589	2542021	2543152	278504	279584	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC869.03c	tos4	SPAC869.03c	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.104599004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794590	2542021	2539035	278504	275608	SPAP14E8.02	SPCC794.09c	tos4	tef101	SPAP14E8.02	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386641738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794591	2542021	2541621	278504	278118	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC29A4.17c	tos4	SPAC29A4.17c	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570296925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794592	2542021	2541135	278504	277650	SPAP14E8.02	SPBC839.03c	tos4	SPBC839.03c	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.509219142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794593	2542021	2541345	278504	277856	SPAP14E8.02	SPBP35G2.07	tos4	ilv1	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.893049602	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794594	2542021	2541374	278504	277885	SPAP14E8.02	SPBPB10D8.06c	tos4	SPBPB10D8.06c	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.715147654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794595	2542021	2542492	278504	278951	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC1B9.02c	tos4	sck1	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.333270276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794596	2542021	2542345	278504	278811	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC1705.02	tos4	SPAC1705.02	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC1F2.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.128180173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794597	2542021	2539913	278504	276457	SPAP14E8.02	SPBC11G11.03	tos4	mrt4	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.301559497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794598	2542021	2542156	278504	278632	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC57A7.07c	tos4	SPAC57A7.07c	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510539302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794599	2542021	2538801	278504	275382	SPAP14E8.02	SPCC285.13c	tos4	nup60	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.475758474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794600	2542021	2542555	278504	279012	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC1952.06c	tos4	SPAC1952.06c	SPAP14E8.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869590989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794601	2542021	2539064	278504	275636	SPAP14E8.02	SPCC126.06	tos4	twf1	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.757368136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794602	2542021	2540727	278504	277250	SPAP14E8.02	SPBC1921.03c	tos4	mex67	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.285754677	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794603	2542021	2543514	278504	279932	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC4D7.03	tos4	pop2	SPAP14E8.02	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.091297398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794604	2542021	2542950	278504	279390	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC12B10.03	tos4	bun62	SPAP14E8.02	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.69485008	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794605	2542021	2538738	278504	275321	SPAP14E8.02	SPCC320.14	tos4	sry1	SPAP14E8.02	SPCC320.14|SPCC330.15c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.363007312	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794606	2542021	2542964	278504	279404	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC12G12.07c	tos4	SPAC12G12.07c	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387167828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794607	2542021	2542513	278504	278971	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC1952.05	tos4	gcn5	SPAP14E8.02	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.443671516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794608	2542021	2539845	278504	276393	SPAP14E8.02	SPBC12C2.02c	tos4	ste20	SPAP14E8.02	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.471026521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794609	2542021	2542123	278504	278599	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC18G6.15	tos4	mal3	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.381360482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794610	2542021	2542507	278504	278965	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC18G6.13	tos4	SPAC18G6.13	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.814147563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794611	2542021	2541543	278504	278043	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC5H10.04	tos4	SPAC5H10.04	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.747441897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794612	2542021	2543412	278504	279834	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC637.07	tos4	moe1	SPAP14E8.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.454421737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794613	2542021	2539371	278504	275937	SPAP14E8.02	SPCC18B5.06	tos4	dom34	SPAP14E8.02	SPCC18B5.06|erf1|sup45	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.372584667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794614	2542021	2539999	278504	276543	SPAP14E8.02	SPBC1734.15	tos4	rsc4	SPAP14E8.02	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.890374909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794615	2542021	2541496	278504	277998	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC23D3.09	tos4	arp42	SPAP14E8.02	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.622709148	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794616	2542021	2539284	278504	275852	SPAP14E8.02	SPCC584.15c	tos4	SPCC584.15c	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.81304716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794617	2542021	2542861	278504	279307	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC13G7.13c	tos4	msa1	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC6C3.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.8504939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794618	2542021	2542946	278504	279386	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC6F12.03c	tos4	fsv1	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.561298068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794619	2542021	2541588	278504	278085	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC1565.03	tos4	SPAC1565.03	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319707095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794620	2542021	2543522	278504	279940	SPAP14E8.02	SPAPB24D3.08c	tos4	SPAPB24D3.08c	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.491427625	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794621	2542021	2540990	278504	277506	SPAP14E8.02	SPBC36B7.06c	tos4	mug20	SPAP14E8.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.045032575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794622	2542021	2542720	278504	279171	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC25G10.05c	tos4	his1	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.704497735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794623	2542021	2539043	278504	275616	SPAP14E8.02	SPCC1235.08c	tos4	pdh1	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.303528082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794624	2542021	2540599	278504	277125	SPAP14E8.02	SPBC29A3.10c	tos4	atp14	SPAP14E8.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.463582367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794625	2542021	2538690	278504	275275	SPAP14E8.02	SPCC1393.05	tos4	ers1	SPAP14E8.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.135455036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794626	2542021	2539812	278504	276362	SPAP14E8.02	SPBC1347.02	tos4	fkbp39	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.107337086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794627	2542021	2542673	278504	279126	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC26A3.11	tos4	SPAC26A3.11	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.589571976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794628	2542021	2539354	278504	275920	SPAP14E8.02	SPCC4F11.03c	tos4	SPCC4F11.03c	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.661824692	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794629	2542021	2543051	278504	279486	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC1071.08	tos4	rpp203	SPAP14E8.02	rla6|rpp2-3|rpa2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.762038078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794630	2542021	2540498	278504	277026	SPAP14E8.02	SPBC27.02c	tos4	ask1	SPAP14E8.02	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.680471447	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794631	2542021	2542621	278504	279075	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC5H10.05c	tos4	SPAC5H10.05c	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.330964666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794632	2542021	2543304	278504	279728	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC6B12.12	tos4	tom70	SPAP14E8.02	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.079531471	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794633	2542021	2543662	278504	280076	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC9.07c	tos4	SPAC9.07c	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.559492948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794634	2542021	2543219	278504	279647	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC56F8.09	tos4	rrp8	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.983533516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794635	2542021	2542826	278504	279273	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC13G6.09	tos4	SPAC13G6.09	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.970217014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794636	2542021	2541637	278504	278133	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC57A10.04	tos4	mug10	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.945003799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794637	2542021	3361117	278504	280193	SPAP14E8.02	SPCC663.17	tos4	wtf15	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.864502791	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794638	2542021	2541806	278504	278297	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC4G8.13c	tos4	prz1	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.398799568	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794639	2542021	2543387	278504	279809	SPAP14E8.02	SPAPB1E7.02c	tos4	mcl1	SPAP14E8.02	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.902844441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794640	2542021	2543333	278504	279756	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC694.02	tos4	SPAC694.02	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.130281965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794641	2542021	2542094	278504	278571	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC29B12.06c	tos4	rcd1	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.462769222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794642	2542021	2539599	278504	276157	SPAP14E8.02	SPCP31B10.02	tos4	SPCP31B10.02	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.866215866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794643	2542021	2542879	278504	279324	SPAP14E8.02	SPAC13G7.07	tos4	arb2	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.193401906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794644	2542021	2543660	278504	280074	SPAP14E8.02	SPAPB1E7.08c	tos4	SPAPB1E7.08c	SPAP14E8.02	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.398581331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794645	2541088	2542895	277603	279339	SPBC609.05	SPAC13G6.10c	pob3	asl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.259015491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794646	2541088	2541257	277603	277771	SPBC609.05	SPBP23A10.14c	pob3	ell1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.146514211	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794647	2541088	2541826	277603	278317	SPBC609.05	SPAC2G11.13	pob3	atg22	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.644179025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794648	2541088	2542577	277603	279033	SPBC609.05	SPAC19G12.15c	pob3	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.055075351	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794649	2541088	2540105	277603	276642	SPBC609.05	SPBC106.04	pob3	ada1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.860487004	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794650	2541088	2542518	277603	278976	SPBC609.05	SPAC1B3.16c	pob3	vht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.803955397	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794651	2541088	2541512	277603	278013	SPBC609.05	SPAC11E3.08c	pob3	nse6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.978399701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794652	2541088	2540913	277603	277429	SPBC609.05	SPBC56F2.08c	pob3	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.746032033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794653	2541088	2541426	277603	277931	SPBC609.05	SPAC227.06	pob3	SPAC227.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.975198371	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794654	2541088	2543064	277603	279497	SPBC609.05	SPAC3G6.01	pob3	hrp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.083122948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794655	2541088	2542378	277603	278842	SPBC609.05	SPAC1805.04	pob3	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.80235136	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794656	2541088	2540995	277603	277511	SPBC609.05	SPBC337.16	pob3	cho1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046271622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794657	2541088	2539035	277603	275608	SPBC609.05	SPCC794.09c	pob3	tef101	-	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.860865422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794658	2541088	2538993	277603	275567	SPBC609.05	SPCC162.12	pob3	tco89	-	SPCC1753.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.53897065	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794659	2541088	2541135	277603	277650	SPBC609.05	SPBC839.03c	pob3	SPBC839.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.84858232	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794660	2541088	3361561	277603	280637	SPBC609.05	SPAC11E3.01c	pob3	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.488316562	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794661	2541088	2542502	277603	278960	SPBC609.05	SPAC139.06	pob3	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.811886268	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794662	2541088	2541345	277603	277856	SPBC609.05	SPBP35G2.07	pob3	ilv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.98583954	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794663	2541088	2542963	277603	279403	SPBC609.05	SPAC1071.03c	pob3	sil1	-	SPAC1071.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.262806777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794664	2541088	2540686	277603	277211	SPBC609.05	SPBC21D10.10	pob3	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.294480738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794665	2541088	2539890	277603	276436	SPBC609.05	SPBC16C6.03c	pob3	SPBC16C6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.373309705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794666	2541088	2542071	277603	278548	SPBC609.05	SPAC26H5.03	pob3	pcf2	-	cac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505606642	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794667	2541088	2538806	277603	275387	SPBC609.05	SPCC1840.09	pob3	SPCC1840.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.719295387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794668	2541088	2541286	277603	277799	SPBC609.05	SPBC9B6.11c	pob3	SPBC9B6.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991522368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794669	2541088	2543098	277603	279530	SPBC609.05	SPAC4A8.06c	pob3	SPAC4A8.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.324553541	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794670	2541088	2539332	277603	275898	SPBC609.05	SPCPB1C11.01	pob3	amt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864520153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794671	2541088	2539226	277603	275796	SPBC609.05	SPCC16C4.20c	pob3	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.019022793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794672	2541088	2542107	277603	278583	SPBC609.05	SPAC30.01c	pob3	sec72	-	sec7b|sec702	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981203807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794673	2541088	2538847	277603	275428	SPBC609.05	SPCC594.06c	pob3	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.553499653	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794674	2541088	2542273	277603	278742	SPBC609.05	SPAC17H9.13c	pob3	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.624742477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794675	2541088	2538775	277603	275357	SPBC609.05	SPCC23B6.05c	pob3	ssb3	-	rpa3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.968992399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794676	2541088	2541682	277603	278178	SPBC609.05	SPAC15F9.02	pob3	seh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.817674199	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794677	2541088	2542689	277603	279142	SPBC609.05	SPAC29B12.04	pob3	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.103978025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794678	2541088	2540919	277603	277435	SPBC609.05	SPBC543.07	pob3	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.468354155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794679	2541088	2539434	277603	275997	SPBC609.05	SPCC757.09c	pob3	rnc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.446251554	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794680	2541088	2541503	277603	278005	SPBC609.05	SPAC22A12.01c	pob3	pso2	-	SPAC56F8.17c|snm1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.559156361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794681	2541088	2540220	277603	276753	SPBC609.05	SPBC337.03	pob3	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.061349745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794682	2541088	2539797	277603	276347	SPBC609.05	SPBC16G5.14c	pob3	rps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.984925439	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794683	2541088	2539064	277603	275636	SPBC609.05	SPCC126.06	pob3	twf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.780033333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794684	2541088	2538735	277603	275319	SPBC609.05	SPCC70.10	pob3	SPCC70.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.891369753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794685	2541088	2543045	277603	279480	SPBC609.05	SPAC12G12.11c	pob3	SPAC12G12.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.441780473	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794686	2541088	2540993	277603	277509	SPBC609.05	SPBC342.01c	pob3	alg6	-	SPBC3F6.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.271030817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794687	2541088	2541538	277603	278038	SPBC609.05	SPAC24B11.08c	pob3	SPAC24B11.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.053076936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794688	2541088	2541424	277603	277929	SPBC609.05	SPAC23G3.04	pob3	ies4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.146487052	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794689	2541088	2542277	277603	278746	SPBC609.05	SPAC17A5.02c	pob3	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.163558784	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794690	2541088	2541643	277603	278139	SPBC609.05	SPAC14C4.13	pob3	rad17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.336110437	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794691	2541088	2541923	277603	278411	SPBC609.05	SPAC23C4.09c	pob3	SPAC23C4.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.580566369	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794692	2541088	2540263	277603	276794	SPBC609.05	SPBC32H8.02c	pob3	nep2	-	mug120|pi021|SPACTOKYO_453.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.192517752	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794693	2541088	2539961	277603	276505	SPBC609.05	SPBC1198.09	pob3	ubc16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.500580513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794694	2541088	2539244	277603	275814	SPBC609.05	SPCC1672.06c	pob3	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.032491276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794695	2541088	2540059	277603	276597	SPBC609.05	SPBC1198.01	pob3	fmd2	-	SPBC1198.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.941194032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794696	2541088	2543563	277603	279979	SPBC609.05	SPAC664.02c	pob3	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.471197489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794697	2541088	2543426	277603	279846	SPBC609.05	SPAC631.02	pob3	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.695530894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794698	2541088	2543078	277603	279511	SPBC609.05	SPAC31A2.15c	pob3	dcc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.25503879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794699	2541088	2539381	277603	275947	SPBC609.05	SPCC1739.10	pob3	mug33	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193226857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794700	2541088	2542845	277603	279291	SPBC609.05	SPAC824.04	pob3	SPAC824.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.741400318	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794701	2541088	2539574	277603	276134	SPBC609.05	SPCPB16A4.04c	pob3	trm8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.252356418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794702	2541088	2542558	277603	279014	SPBC609.05	SPAC1952.07	pob3	rad1	-	rad19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.277300719	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794703	2541088	2542665	277603	279118	SPBC609.05	SPAC10F6.08c	pob3	nht10	-	nht1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.479214064	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794704	2541088	2542568	277603	279024	SPBC609.05	SPAC1952.02	pob3	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145676173	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794705	2541088	2542268	277603	278737	SPBC609.05	SPAC17A5.07c	pob3	ulp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.978104331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794706	2541088	2541275	277603	277789	SPBC609.05	SPBC947.06c	pob3	SPBC947.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.499392082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794707	2541088	2542036	277603	278518	SPBC609.05	SPAC23A1.19c	pob3	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781587495	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794708	2541088	2539098	277603	275670	SPBC609.05	SPCC24B10.18	pob3	SPCC24B10.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.048645228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794709	2541088	2539467	277603	276030	SPBC609.05	SPCC417.07c	pob3	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.692224404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794710	2541088	2543020	277603	279456	SPBC609.05	SPAC10F6.13c	pob3	SPAC10F6.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.998262434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794711	2541088	2539003	277603	275577	SPBC609.05	SPCC1442.17c	pob3	ist1	-	SPCC285.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.835477293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794712	2541088	2539870	277603	276416	SPBC609.05	SPBC1709.18	pob3	tif452	-	SPBC409.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.636082411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794713	2541088	2542964	277603	279404	SPBC609.05	SPAC12G12.07c	pob3	SPAC12G12.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.199191433	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794714	2541088	2540892	277603	277408	SPBC609.05	SPBC530.01	pob3	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.500762153	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794715	2541088	2541160	277603	277675	SPBC609.05	SPBC725.09c	pob3	hob3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.407556217	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794716	2541088	2540546	277603	277073	SPBC609.05	SPBC25B2.06c	pob3	btb2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.510411795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794717	2541088	2543412	277603	279834	SPBC609.05	SPAC637.07	pob3	moe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.416116683	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794718	2541088	2539733	277603	276285	SPBC609.05	SPBC16E9.12c	pob3	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.723876939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794719	2541088	2540396	277603	276924	SPBC609.05	SPBC31F10.12	pob3	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.412292293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794720	2541088	2540673	277603	277198	SPBC609.05	SPBC1D7.03	pob3	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.511610854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794721	2541088	2542464	277603	278925	SPBC609.05	SPAC1A6.09c	pob3	lag1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096296738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794722	2541088	2539484	277603	276047	SPBC609.05	SPCC594.04c	pob3	SPCC594.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377586127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794723	2541088	2539999	277603	276543	SPBC609.05	SPBC1734.15	pob3	rsc4	-	brd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.628506614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794724	2541088	2543667	277603	280081	SPBC609.05	SPAC4H3.02c	pob3	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.610269073	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794725	2541088	2539689	277603	276244	SPBC609.05	SPBC1861.03	pob3	mak10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.920655068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794726	2541088	2541899	277603	278389	SPBC609.05	SPAC22E12.11c	pob3	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.630292866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794727	2541088	2540831	277603	277349	SPBC609.05	SPBC428.02c	pob3	eca39	-	SPBC582.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.695431207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794728	2541088	2541710	277603	278205	SPBC609.05	SPAC343.11c	pob3	msc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.332790976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794729	2541088	2539667	277603	276222	SPBC609.05	SPBC13G1.08c	pob3	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.187431302	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794730	2541088	2538873	277603	275452	SPBC609.05	SPCC306.11	pob3	SPCC306.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.909046745	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794731	2541088	2543244	277603	279672	SPBC609.05	SPAC6B12.06c	pob3	rrg9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.26718407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794732	2541088	2542946	277603	279386	SPBC609.05	SPAC6F12.03c	pob3	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386819013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794733	2541088	2539974	277603	276518	SPBC609.05	SPBC32H8.07	pob3	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.927535498	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794734	2541088	2541720	277603	278214	SPBC609.05	SPAC23H3.13c	pob3	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.078192556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794735	2541088	2543236	277603	279664	SPBC609.05	SPAC8C9.04	pob3	SPAC8C9.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.411598461	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794736	2541088	2542431	277603	278893	SPBC609.05	SPAC1A6.01c	pob3	SPAC1A6.01c	-	SPAC23C4.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.622472094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794737	2541088	2543301	277603	279726	SPBC609.05	SPAC977.17	pob3	SPAC977.17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.929580482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794738	2541088	2539408	277603	275973	SPBC609.05	SPCC576.12c	pob3	mhf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.774366247	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794739	2541088	2542855	277603	279301	SPBC609.05	SPAC144.04c	pob3	spe1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505293177	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794740	2541088	2542519	277603	278977	SPBC609.05	SPAC19G12.08	pob3	scs7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.14895762	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794741	2541088	2539953	277603	276497	SPBC609.05	SPBC1709.11c	pob3	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.989985455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794742	2541088	2540990	277603	277506	SPBC609.05	SPBC36B7.06c	pob3	mug20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.099974936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794743	2541088	2543443	277603	279863	SPBC609.05	SPAC3H1.12c	pob3	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.466505815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794744	2541088	2541389	277603	277900	SPBC609.05	SPBPB2B2.09c	pob3	SPBPB2B2.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.916507014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794745	2541088	2541536	277603	278036	SPBC609.05	SPAC1071.02	pob3	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.49690612	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794746	2541088	2541708	277603	278203	SPBC609.05	SPAC31A2.02	pob3	trm112	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.000286794	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794747	2541088	2541464	277603	277966	SPBC609.05	SPAC222.08c	pob3	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.294437222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794748	2541088	2539847	277603	276395	SPBC609.05	SPBC530.14c	pob3	dsk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.030427555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794749	2541088	2538690	277603	275275	SPBC609.05	SPCC1393.05	pob3	ers1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.381121497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794750	2541088	2542550	277603	279007	SPBC609.05	SPAC1B3.02c	pob3	SPAC1B3.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645929063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794751	2541088	2541746	277603	278240	SPBC609.05	SPAC20G4.04c	pob3	hus1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.761976164	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794752	2541088	2541337	277603	277848	SPBC609.05	SPBP35G2.13c	pob3	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.642109109	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794753	2541088	2543254	277603	279682	SPBC609.05	SPAC1006.03c	pob3	red1	-	iss3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.260693366	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794754	2541088	2543139	277603	279571	SPBC609.05	SPAC12G12.03	pob3	cip2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.701255255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794755	2541088	2542748	277603	279198	SPBC609.05	SPAC15A10.09c	pob3	pun1	-	SPAC15A10.09c|sur7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.708795577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794756	2541088	3361520	277603	280596	SPBC609.05	SPAC1610.02c	pob3	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.124947488	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794757	2541088	2541762	277603	278256	SPBC609.05	SPAC139.01c	pob3	SPAC139.01c	-	SPAC955.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.816218348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794758	2541088	2539538	277603	276100	SPBC609.05	SPCC364.06	pob3	nap1	-	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.939418229	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794759	2541088	2542170	277603	278645	SPBC609.05	SPAC17G8.13c	pob3	mst2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.637200746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794760	2541088	2539706	277603	276259	SPBC609.05	SPBC16G5.13	pob3	ptf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.21097126	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794761	2541088	2542992	277603	279430	SPBC609.05	SPAC1071.09c	pob3	SPAC1071.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.781095721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794762	2541088	2539499	277603	276062	SPBC609.05	SPCC622.08c	pob3	hta1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.947724643	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794763	2541088	2542516	277603	278974	SPBC609.05	SPAC2F7.04	pob3	pmc2	-	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.815543204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794764	2541088	2540061	277603	276599	SPBC609.05	SPBC119.12	pob3	rud3	-	SPBC119.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.322986044	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794765	2541088	2543670	277603	280084	SPBC609.05	SPAPB1E7.06c	pob3	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.647222032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794766	2541088	2541909	277603	278399	SPBC609.05	SPAC227.01c	pob3	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.294480738	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794767	2541088	2542883	277603	279328	SPBC609.05	SPAC1486.04c	pob3	alm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.635457198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794768	2541088	2540800	277603	277319	SPBC609.05	SPBC409.20c	pob3	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.431379688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794769	2541088	2539770	277603	276321	SPBC609.05	SPBC1685.11	pob3	rlp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935032218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794770	2541088	2541689	277603	278185	SPBC609.05	SPAC24C9.05c	pob3	mug70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.73993406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794771	2541088	2538966	277603	275540	SPBC609.05	SPCC18.10	pob3	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.001137118	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794772	2541088	2539246	277603	275816	SPBC609.05	SPCC18.13	pob3	SPCC18.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.704277841	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794773	2541088	2540600	277603	277126	SPBC609.05	SPBC4.05	pob3	mlo2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.390009269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794774	2541088	2541100	277603	277615	SPBC609.05	SPBC651.04	pob3	SPBC651.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.072984186	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794775	2541088	2541425	277603	277930	SPBC609.05	SPAC2C4.17c	pob3	msy2	-	SPAC2C4.17c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.273945106	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794776	2541088	2541531	277603	278031	SPBC609.05	SPAC25A8.01c	pob3	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.997381025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794777	2541088	2540699	277603	277223	SPBC609.05	SPBC800.08	pob3	gcd10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.750001691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794778	2541088	2539136	277603	275708	SPBC609.05	SPCC1919.05	pob3	SPCC1919.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811674257	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794779	2541088	2538916	277603	275493	SPBC609.05	SPCC16C4.17	pob3	mug123	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.388273871	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794780	2541088	2542826	277603	279273	SPBC609.05	SPAC13G6.09	pob3	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.617396307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794781	2541088	2539668	277603	276223	SPBC609.05	SPBC11B10.10c	pob3	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.302783644	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794782	2541088	2540992	277603	277508	SPBC609.05	SPBC342.05	pob3	crb2	-	rhp9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.693139652	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794783	2541088	2540927	277603	277443	SPBC609.05	SPBC365.06	pob3	pmt3	-	smt3|ubl2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.907961571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794784	2541088	2540555	277603	277082	SPBC609.05	SPBP16F5.02	pob3	mcs2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567626825	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794785	2541088	2543633	277603	280047	SPBC609.05	SPAC3H8.05c	pob3	mms1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.560875144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794786	2541088	2539928	277603	276472	SPBC609.05	SPBC1604.08c	pob3	imp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.478283576	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794787	2541088	2541757	277603	278251	SPBC609.05	SPAC2F7.10	pob3	akr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.454455092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794788	2541088	2542838	277603	279284	SPBC609.05	SPAC13G7.11	pob3	SPAC13G7.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.311304712	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794789	2541088	2539375	277603	275941	SPBC609.05	SPCC4G3.11	pob3	mug154	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.385783407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794790	2541088	2543337	277603	279760	SPBC609.05	SPAC959.08	pob3	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.767310345	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794791	2541088	2543327	277603	279750	SPBC609.05	SPAC1D4.06c	pob3	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.50564582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794792	2541088	2540173	277603	276706	SPBC609.05	SPBC106.13	pob3	SPBC106.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.743172451	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794793	2541088	2543087	277603	279520	SPBC609.05	SPAC30C2.04	pob3	SPAC30C2.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988407773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794794	2541088	2543076	277603	279509	SPBC609.05	SPAC30C2.07	pob3	SPAC30C2.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.507931307	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794795	2541088	2539014	277603	275587	SPBC609.05	SPCC18B5.05c	pob3	SPCC18B5.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.565462962	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794796	2541088	2542795	277603	279243	SPBC609.05	SPAC9G1.05	pob3	aip1	-	SPAC9G1.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448763055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794797	2541088	2542424	277603	278886	SPBC609.05	SPAC1805.14	pob3	SPAC1805.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.461766585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794798	2541088	2541869	277603	278359	SPBC609.05	SPAC22F3.13	pob3	tsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643614028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794799	2541088	2543237	277603	279665	SPBC609.05	SPAC6B12.02c	pob3	mus7	-	mms22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.194158593	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794800	2541088	2542094	277603	278571	SPBC609.05	SPAC29B12.06c	pob3	rcd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.025392946	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794801	2541088	2541062	277603	277577	SPBC609.05	SPBC660.11	pob3	tcg1	-	mug187	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.280553328	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794802	2541088	2542836	277603	279282	SPBC609.05	SPAC13G7.06	pob3	met16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.719952029	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794803	2539787	2539405	276337	275970	SPBC15C4.06c	SPCC553.03	SPBC15C4.06c	pex1	SPBC21H7.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.439742691	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794804	2539787	2541971	276337	278456	SPBC15C4.06c	SPAC27F1.05c	SPBC15C4.06c	SPAC27F1.05c	SPBC21H7.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934696694	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794805	2539787	2541818	276337	278309	SPBC15C4.06c	SPAC11G7.02	SPBC15C4.06c	pub1	SPBC21H7.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.91518773	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794806	2539787	2540131	276337	276668	SPBC15C4.06c	SPBC1778.05c	SPBC15C4.06c	SPBC1778.05c	SPBC21H7.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.043393443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794807	2539787	2540433	276337	276961	SPBC15C4.06c	SPBC2D10.06	SPBC15C4.06c	rep1	SPBC21H7.01c	rec16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567839676	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794808	2539787	5802967	276337	858105	SPBC15C4.06c	SPAC20G4.08	SPBC15C4.06c	pdc1	SPBC21H7.01c	SPAC20G4.08|SPAC4F10.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.864511013	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794809	2539787	2540168	276337	276703	SPBC15C4.06c	SPBC1683.06c	SPBC15C4.06c	SPBC1683.06c	SPBC21H7.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.86563445	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794810	2539787	2539201	276337	275772	SPBC15C4.06c	SPCC188.09c	SPBC15C4.06c	pfl4	SPBC21H7.01c	SPCC188.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808557584	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794811	2539787	2541361	276337	277872	SPBC15C4.06c	SPBP8B7.10c	SPBC15C4.06c	utp16	SPBC21H7.01c	SPBP8B7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446104934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794812	2539787	2541795	276337	278286	SPBC15C4.06c	SPAC2E1P3.02c	SPBC15C4.06c	amt3	SPBC21H7.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.151192582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794813	2539787	2542714	276337	279167	SPBC15C4.06c	SPAC5H10.06c	SPBC15C4.06c	adh4	SPBC21H7.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.095737649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794814	2539787	2538801	276337	275382	SPBC15C4.06c	SPCC285.13c	SPBC15C4.06c	nup60	SPBC21H7.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.457212995	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794815	2539787	2539310	276337	275877	SPBC15C4.06c	SPCC285.17	SPBC15C4.06c	spp27	SPBC21H7.01c	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.577405795	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794816	2539787	2542568	276337	279024	SPBC15C4.06c	SPAC1952.02	SPBC15C4.06c	tma23	SPBC21H7.01c	SPAC1952.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513220368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794817	2539787	2542268	276337	278737	SPBC15C4.06c	SPAC17A5.07c	SPBC15C4.06c	ulp2	SPBC21H7.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.559134698	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794818	2539787	2542123	276337	278599	SPBC15C4.06c	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC15C4.06c	mal3	SPBC21H7.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935796078	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794819	2539787	2541543	276337	278043	SPBC15C4.06c	SPAC5H10.04	SPBC15C4.06c	SPAC5H10.04	SPBC21H7.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925155494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794820	2539787	3361455	276337	280531	SPBC15C4.06c	SPAC1782.01	SPBC15C4.06c	ecm29	SPBC21H7.01c	SPAPYUG7.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924988998	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794821	2539787	2543101	276337	279533	SPBC15C4.06c	SPAC323.03c	SPBC15C4.06c	SPAC323.03c	SPBC21H7.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.508482421	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794822	2539787	2542014	276337	278497	SPBC15C4.06c	SPAC20H4.04	SPBC15C4.06c	fml2	SPBC21H7.01c	mfh2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153376323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794823	2539787	2541488	276337	277990	SPBC15C4.06c	SPAC227.17c	SPBC15C4.06c	SPAC227.17c	SPBC21H7.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.329909976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794824	2539787	2541762	276337	278256	SPBC15C4.06c	SPAC139.01c	SPBC15C4.06c	SPAC139.01c	SPBC21H7.01c	SPAC955.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81032241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794825	2539787	2538907	276337	275484	SPBC15C4.06c	SPCC24B10.19c	SPBC15C4.06c	nts1	SPBC21H7.01c	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.931296829	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794826	2539787	2540619	276337	277145	SPBC15C4.06c	SPBC25H2.15	SPBC15C4.06c	SPBC25H2.15	SPBC21H7.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.388319222	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794827	2539787	2540464	276337	276992	SPBC15C4.06c	SPBC23E6.02	SPBC15C4.06c	rrp2	SPBC21H7.01c	SPBC23E6.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195228269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794828	2539787	2543649	276337	280063	SPBC15C4.06c	SPAC3H5.11	SPBC15C4.06c	SPAC3H5.11	SPBC21H7.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509883441	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794829	2539787	2540064	276337	276602	SPBC15C4.06c	SPBC1718.02	SPBC15C4.06c	hop1	SPBC21H7.01c	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446435361	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794830	2539787	2543044	276337	279479	SPBC15C4.06c	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC15C4.06c	tip1	SPBC21H7.01c	noc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.875842609	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794831	2539787	2542021	276337	278504	SPBC15C4.06c	SPAP14E8.02	SPBC15C4.06c	tos4	SPBC21H7.01c	SPAP14E8.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927040413	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794832	2539787	2543387	276337	279809	SPBC15C4.06c	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC15C4.06c	mcl1	SPBC21H7.01c	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.999104233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794833	2539787	2543327	276337	279750	SPBC15C4.06c	SPAC1D4.06c	SPBC15C4.06c	csk1	SPBC21H7.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812454866	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794834	2539787	2539531	276337	276093	SPBC15C4.06c	SPCC576.02	SPBC15C4.06c	SPCC576.02	SPBC21H7.01c	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818048913	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794835	2539787	2541062	276337	277577	SPBC15C4.06c	SPBC660.11	SPBC15C4.06c	tcg1	SPBC21H7.01c	mug187	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.874732169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794836	2538901	2538961	275479	275535	SPCP1E11.07c	SPCC285.14	cwf18	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515553828	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794837	2538901	2542848	275479	279294	SPCP1E11.07c	SPAC9G1.03c	cwf18	rpl3001	-	rpl30|rpl30-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.042968542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794838	2538901	2542555	275479	279012	SPCP1E11.07c	SPAC1952.06c	cwf18	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.191036295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794839	2538901	3361543	275479	280619	SPCP1E11.07c	SPAC9.13c	cwf18	cwf16	-	SPAPJ735.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.291435165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794840	2538901	2542874	275479	279319	SPCP1E11.07c	SPAC20H4.09	cwf18	SPAC20H4.09	-	SPAC145.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.406709155	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794841	2538901	2541900	275479	278390	SPCP1E11.07c	SPAC23H4.17c	cwf18	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.478491657	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794842	2538901	3361520	275479	280596	SPCP1E11.07c	SPAC1610.02c	cwf18	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.956843673	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794843	2538901	2543304	275479	279728	SPCP1E11.07c	SPAC6B12.12	cwf18	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.946050244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794844	2538901	2541675	275479	278171	SPCP1E11.07c	SPAC22F8.12c	cwf18	shf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575837299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794845	2538901	2541124	275479	277639	SPCP1E11.07c	SPBC646.02	cwf18	cwf11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.138007057	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794846	2539545	2540235	276106	276767	SPCC4B3.12	SPBC336.13c	set9	SPBC336.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.644042123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794847	2539545	2543685	276106	280099	SPCC4B3.12	SPAC3C7.03c	set9	rad55	-	rhp55	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.661437487	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794848	2539545	2541496	276106	277998	SPCC4B3.12	SPAC23D3.09	set9	arp42	-	arp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.797897288	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794849	2539545	2542007	276106	278490	SPCC4B3.12	SPAC20H4.07	set9	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.691865117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794850	2539545	2539958	276106	276502	SPCC4B3.12	SPBC1718.07c	set9	zfs1	-	moc4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.137257928	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794851	2539545	2543624	276106	280038	SPCC4B3.12	SPAC4D7.06c	set9	SPAC4D7.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.328599276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794852	2539362	2541208	275928	277722	SPCC18B5.10c	SPBC887.04c	SPCC18B5.10c	lub1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.584080124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794853	2539362	2542555	275928	279012	SPCC18B5.10c	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC18B5.10c	SPAC1952.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.639109598	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794854	2539362	2541643	275928	278139	SPCC18B5.10c	SPAC14C4.13	SPCC18B5.10c	rad17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.935764905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794855	2539362	2540893	275928	277409	SPCC18B5.10c	SPBC543.10	SPCC18B5.10c	get1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.467005707	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794856	2539362	2542311	275928	278777	SPCC18B5.10c	SPAC16A10.05c	SPCC18B5.10c	dad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.042600785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794857	2539362	2539733	275928	276285	SPCC18B5.10c	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC18B5.10c	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516903003	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794858	2539362	2543619	275928	280033	SPCC18B5.10c	SPAC4F10.04	SPCC18B5.10c	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.804528149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794859	2539362	2542767	275928	279217	SPCC18B5.10c	SPAC1565.07c	SPCC18B5.10c	knd1	-	SPAC1565.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.851454338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794860	2539362	2542883	275928	279328	SPCC18B5.10c	SPAC1486.04c	SPCC18B5.10c	alm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.327083837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794861	2539362	2541789	275928	278281	SPCC18B5.10c	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC18B5.10c	iwr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.159667827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794862	2541080	2538961	277595	275535	SPBC557.04	SPCC285.14	ppk29	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.920949202	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794863	2541080	2542747	277595	279197	SPBC557.04	SPAC15A10.06	ppk29	SPAC15A10.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.123657678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794864	2541080	2538922	277595	275499	SPBC557.04	SPCC16C4.10	ppk29	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.92588868	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794865	2541080	2540417	277595	276945	SPBC557.04	SPBC21C3.06	ppk29	SPBC21C3.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.871892196	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794866	2541080	2543563	277595	279979	SPBC557.04	SPAC664.02c	ppk29	arp8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987512881	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794867	2541080	2542519	277595	278977	SPBC557.04	SPAC19G12.08	ppk29	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448846645	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794868	2541080	2540184	277595	276717	SPBC557.04	SPBC106.12c	ppk29	SPBC106.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.318661403	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794869	2541080	2541746	277595	278240	SPBC557.04	SPAC20G4.04c	ppk29	hus1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.084185167	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794870	2541080	2542875	277595	279320	SPBC557.04	SPAC13G7.02c	ppk29	ssa1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.504124561	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794871	2541080	2543567	277595	279983	SPBC557.04	SPAC890.03	ppk29	ppk16	-	mug92	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.867924708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794872	2541080	2539030	277595	275603	SPBC557.04	SPCP1E11.02	ppk29	ppk38	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.693836654	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794873	2541080	2543304	277595	279728	SPBC557.04	SPAC6B12.12	ppk29	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.200686043	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794874	2541080	2542418	277595	278881	SPBC557.04	SPAC1805.07c	ppk29	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.559945368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794875	2541080	2542716	277595	279169	SPBC557.04	SPAC25H1.07	ppk29	emc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.547042985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794876	2541710	2538939	278205	275514	SPAC343.11c	SPCC1672.04c	msc1	SPCC1672.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098408006	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794877	2541710	2542080	278205	278557	SPAC343.11c	SPAC27D7.03c	msc1	mei2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.486147552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794878	2541710	3361561	278205	280637	SPAC343.11c	SPAC11E3.01c	msc1	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.322175412	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794879	2541710	2540347	278205	276876	SPAC343.11c	SPBC30B4.08	msc1	eri1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.664219649	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794880	2541710	2539309	278205	275876	SPAC343.11c	SPCC4G3.19	msc1	alp16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.474704906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794881	2541710	2539463	278205	276026	SPAC343.11c	SPCC550.11	msc1	SPCC550.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.559383993	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794882	2541710	2540929	278205	277445	SPAC343.11c	SPBC354.03	msc1	swd3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.496927915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794883	2541710	2542318	278205	278784	SPAC343.11c	SPAC16C9.05	msc1	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.472243941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794884	2541710	2543110	278205	279542	SPAC343.11c	SPAC56E4.06c	msc1	ggt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.377035434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794885	2541710	2540663	278205	277188	SPAC343.11c	SPBC56F2.06	msc1	mug147	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.586587491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794886	2541710	2541522	278205	278023	SPAC343.11c	SPAC23E2.01	msc1	fep1	-	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.360733338	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794887	2541710	2543426	278205	279846	SPAC343.11c	SPAC631.02	msc1	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.76918102	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794888	2541710	2540825	278205	277343	SPAC343.11c	SPBC428.08c	msc1	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.092418909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794889	2541710	2542311	278205	278777	SPAC343.11c	SPAC16A10.05c	msc1	dad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.914568629	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794890	2541710	2541801	278205	278292	SPAC343.11c	SPAC2F7.08c	msc1	snf5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.259139028	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794891	2541710	2542707	278205	279160	SPAC343.11c	SPAC25G10.03	msc1	zip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.81088497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794892	2541710	2540150	278205	276687	SPAC343.11c	SPBC16E9.14c	msc1	zrg17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.575376303	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794893	2541710	2541889	278205	278379	SPAC343.11c	SPAC2F7.03c	msc1	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.244285767	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794894	2541710	2541496	278205	277998	SPAC343.11c	SPAC23D3.09	msc1	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.247192922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794895	2541710	2543667	278205	280081	SPAC343.11c	SPAC4H3.02c	msc1	swc3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.87792402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794896	2541710	2543643	278205	280057	SPAC343.11c	SPAC3G9.07c	msc1	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.109185701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794897	2541710	2541899	278205	278389	SPAC343.11c	SPAC22E12.11c	msc1	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.474339833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794898	2541710	2540831	278205	277349	SPAC343.11c	SPBC428.02c	msc1	eca39	-	SPBC582.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.569010309	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794899	2541710	2540086	278205	276624	SPAC343.11c	SPBC16H5.12c	msc1	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.012226775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794900	2541710	2539667	278205	276222	SPAC343.11c	SPBC13G1.08c	msc1	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.142104036	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794901	2541710	2541536	278205	278036	SPAC343.11c	SPAC1071.02	msc1	mms19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.435224176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794902	2541710	2540967	278205	277483	SPAC343.11c	SPBC36B7.08c	msc1	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.030360976	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794903	2541710	2541395	278205	277904	SPAC343.11c	SPBP8B7.25	msc1	cyp4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.005811093	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794904	2541710	2539427	278205	275992	SPAC343.11c	SPCC663.15c	msc1	SPCC663.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.419857708	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794905	2541710	2540229	278205	276761	SPAC343.11c	SPBC31F10.15c	msc1	atp15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.666032098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794906	2541710	2540357	278205	276886	SPAC343.11c	SPBC2F12.05c	msc1	SPBC2F12.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.807811837	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794907	2541710	2538884	278205	275462	SPAC343.11c	SPCC1393.08	msc1	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.183999667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794908	2541710	2539421	278205	275986	SPAC343.11c	SPCC794.11c	msc1	ent3	-	SPCC794.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.250705083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794909	2541710	2541337	278205	277848	SPAC343.11c	SPBP35G2.13c	msc1	swc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.314543266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794910	2541710	2539842	278205	276390	SPAC343.11c	SPBC14C8.15	msc1	SPBC14C8.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.542493452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794911	2541710	2538762	278205	275345	SPAC343.11c	SPCC306.04c	msc1	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.751882311	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794912	2541710	2542769	278205	279219	SPAC343.11c	SPAC15A10.10	msc1	mde6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.638942407	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794913	2541710	2539137	278205	275709	SPAC343.11c	SPCC1682.08c	msc1	mcp2	-	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.036920189	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794914	2541710	2540498	278205	277026	SPAC343.11c	SPBC27.02c	msc1	ask1	-	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.022376721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794915	2541710	2543304	278205	279728	SPAC343.11c	SPAC6B12.12	msc1	tom70	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.473154779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794916	2541710	2538966	278205	275540	SPAC343.11c	SPCC18.10	msc1	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.641571455	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794917	2541710	2541531	278205	278031	SPAC343.11c	SPAC25A8.01c	msc1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.02252213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794918	2541710	2542418	278205	278881	SPAC343.11c	SPAC1805.07c	msc1	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.993382444	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794919	2541710	2542222	278205	278695	SPAC343.11c	SPAC31G5.18c	msc1	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.563815735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794920	2541710	2539668	278205	276223	SPAC343.11c	SPBC11B10.10c	msc1	pht1	-	pi001	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.071396169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794921	2541710	2540555	278205	277082	SPAC343.11c	SPBP16F5.02	msc1	mcs2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.378798737	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794922	2541710	2539205	278205	275775	SPAC343.11c	SPCC4B3.15	msc1	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.587072185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794923	2541710	2543525	278205	279943	SPAC343.11c	SPAC4A8.14	msc1	SPAC4A8.14	-	prs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.101133402	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794924	2541710	2540146	278205	276683	SPAC343.11c	SPBC17A3.06	msc1	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.269859494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794925	2541710	2542716	278205	279169	SPAC343.11c	SPAC25H1.07	msc1	emc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.626029552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794926	2541710	2541806	278205	278297	SPAC343.11c	SPAC4G8.13c	msc1	prz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.427880886	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794927	2541710	2540481	278205	277009	SPAC343.11c	SPBC2D10.12	msc1	rhp23	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.920954845	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794928	2543409	2542981	279831	279419	SPAC4D7.13	SPAC824.02	usp104	bst1	prp40	SPAC824.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.897857137	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794929	2543409	2543254	279831	279682	SPAC4D7.13	SPAC1006.03c	usp104	red1	prp40	iss3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.259914246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794930	2543409	2539527	279831	276089	SPAC4D7.13	SPCC338.16	usp104	pof3	prp40	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.994659721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794931	2543409	2538792	279831	275373	SPAC4D7.13	SPCP1E11.10	usp104	SPCP1E11.10	prp40	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.304917758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794932	2543396	2542207	279818	278682	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC17H9.10c	dsc4	ddb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.34468548	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794933	2543396	2539147	279818	275719	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC622.12c	dsc4	gdh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.816804786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794934	2543396	2542895	279818	279339	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC13G6.10c	dsc4	asl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.383854981	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794935	2543396	2538961	279818	275535	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC285.14	dsc4	trs130	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579008793	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794936	2543396	2542080	279818	278557	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC27D7.03c	dsc4	mei2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.896945424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794937	2543396	2543637	279818	280051	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC3H8.02	dsc4	csr102	-	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.263973571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794938	2543396	2541015	279818	277530	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC409.08	dsc4	SPBC409.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.201749127	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794939	2543396	2539582	279818	276141	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC594.07c	dsc4	bqt3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.061836241	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794940	2543396	2540524	279818	277052	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC21B10.08c	dsc4	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.408027803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794941	2543396	2539035	279818	275608	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC794.09c	dsc4	tef101	-	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.470999183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794942	2543396	2539939	279818	276483	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC11G11.01	dsc4	fis1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.904763269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794943	2543396	2542614	279818	279068	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC1399.04c	dsc4	SPAC1399.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.444191123	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794944	2543396	2542107	279818	278583	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC30.01c	dsc4	sec72	-	sec7b|sec702	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.567702817	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794945	2543396	2541205	279818	277719	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC839.02	dsc4	SPBC839.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.502893964	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794946	2543396	2539235	279818	275805	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC1682.15	dsc4	mug122	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.118339084	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794947	2543396	2540029	279818	276573	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC16A3.01	dsc4	spn3	-	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.765214099	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794948	2543396	2543043	279818	279478	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC3F10.13	dsc4	ucp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.253719823	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794949	2543396	2538801	279818	275382	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC285.13c	dsc4	nup60	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.829058271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794950	2543396	2542724	279818	279175	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC767.01c	dsc4	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.835207734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794951	2543396	2539249	279818	275819	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC1450.05c	dsc4	rox3	-	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.979190117	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794952	2543396	2542848	279818	279294	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC9G1.03c	dsc4	rpl3001	-	rpl30|rpl30-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.020386316	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794953	2543396	2543453	279818	279873	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC3G9.03	dsc4	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.319408331	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794954	2543396	3361381	279818	280457	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC12G12.01c	dsc4	SPAC12G12.01c	-	SPAC630.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.804109786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794955	2543396	2543542	279818	279959	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC823.09c	dsc4	SPAC823.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.151781011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794956	2543396	2541558	279818	278057	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC1F7.08	dsc4	fio1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.516241239	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794957	2543396	2539314	279818	275880	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC548.05c	dsc4	dbl5	-	SPCC548.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.240093098	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794958	2543396	2542012	279818	278495	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC23C11.02c	dsc4	rps23	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.132882874	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794959	2543396	2542220	279818	278694	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC1A6.03c	dsc4	SPAC1A6.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.500308377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794960	2543396	2540263	279818	276794	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC32H8.02c	dsc4	nep2	-	mug120|pi021|SPACTOKYO_453.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.195618095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794961	2543396	2541522	279818	278023	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC23E2.01	dsc4	fep1	-	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.775267283	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794962	2543396	2543319	279818	279743	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC6B12.09	dsc4	trm10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.62933255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794963	2543396	2539310	279818	275877	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC285.17	dsc4	spp27	-	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.785238266	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794964	2543396	2539023	279818	275596	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC594.05c	dsc4	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.383143941	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794965	2543396	2539237	279818	275807	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC24B10.13	dsc4	skb5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.451241489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794966	2543396	2539051	279818	275624	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC1183.11	dsc4	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.741412408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794967	2543396	2542863	279818	279309	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC13G7.04c	dsc4	mac1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.951903418	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794968	2543396	2542707	279818	279160	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC25G10.03	dsc4	zip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.505661367	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794969	2543396	2541545	279818	278045	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC22F8.07c	dsc4	rtf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.516997223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794970	2543396	2541038	279818	277553	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC29A10.01	dsc4	ccr1	-	SPBC365.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.981543475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794971	2543396	2540352	279818	276881	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC215.03c	dsc4	csn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778237094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794972	2543396	2542983	279818	279421	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC11D3.15	dsc4	SPAC11D3.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.501864355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794973	2543396	2541496	279818	277998	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC23D3.09	dsc4	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.581000918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794974	2543396	2542522	279818	278980	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC19A8.03	dsc4	ymr1	-	SPAC19A8.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.779297428	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794975	2543396	2539284	279818	275852	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC584.15c	dsc4	SPCC584.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.320932279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794976	2543396	3361269	279818	280345	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC31A8.01c	dsc4	rtn1	-	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.633454989	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794977	2543396	2540665	279818	277190	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC83.02c	dsc4	rpl4302	-	rpl37a-2|rpl43|rpl43-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.629333301	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794978	2543396	2538873	279818	275452	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC306.11	dsc4	SPCC306.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.625396796	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794979	2543396	2538774	279818	275356	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC162.06c	dsc4	SPCC162.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.845321228	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794980	2543396	2542946	279818	279386	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC6F12.03c	dsc4	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.289566702	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794981	2543396	2542419	279818	278882	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC17G6.05c	dsc4	bro1	-	SPAC17G6.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.304372124	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794982	2543396	2539815	279818	276365	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC1105.02c	dsc4	lys4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.787847557	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794983	2543396	2543236	279818	279664	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC8C9.04	dsc4	SPAC8C9.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.918255244	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794984	2543396	2543495	279818	279914	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC513.03	dsc4	mfm2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.477070756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794985	2543396	2541248	279818	277762	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC8D2.10c	dsc4	rmt3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.443320207	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794986	2543396	2542254	279818	278724	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC30D11.04c	dsc4	nup124	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.920308201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794987	2543396	2541900	279818	278390	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC23H4.17c	dsc4	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.83679701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794988	2543396	2543301	279818	279726	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC977.17	dsc4	SPAC977.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.856537778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794989	2543396	2543683	279818	280097	SPAC4D7.11	SPAPB1E7.04c	dsc4	SPAPB1E7.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.034175539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794990	2543396	2540201	279818	276734	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC13A2.04c	dsc4	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.379410039	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794991	2543396	2541410	279818	277918	SPAC4D7.11	SPBPB2B2.17c	dsc4	SPBPB2B2.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.980146128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794992	2543396	2539427	279818	275992	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC663.15c	dsc4	SPCC663.15c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.273150697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794993	2543396	2539421	279818	275986	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC794.11c	dsc4	ent3	-	SPCC794.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.323056843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794994	2543396	2539213	279818	275783	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC285.10c	dsc4	SPCC285.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.077938575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794995	2543396	2542255	279818	278725	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC57A7.08	dsc4	pzh1	-	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.512223183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794996	2543396	2541337	279818	277848	SPAC4D7.11	SPBP35G2.13c	dsc4	swc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.029507704	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794997	2543396	2542875	279818	279320	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC13G7.02c	dsc4	ssa1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.510924088	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794998	2543396	2539538	279818	276100	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC364.06	dsc4	nap1	-	nap11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.900058333	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
794999	2543396	2539763	279818	276314	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC1861.05	dsc4	SPBC1861.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.197162315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795000	2543396	2541525	279818	278025	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC27D7.02c	dsc4	SPAC27D7.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.435296615	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795001	2543396	2540001	279818	276545	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC1289.13c	dsc4	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.931701424	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795002	2543396	2542759	279818	279209	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC9G1.07	dsc4	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.606976249	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795003	2543396	2540519	279818	277047	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC21C3.14c	dsc4	SPBC21C3.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.7831984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795004	2543396	2541909	279818	278399	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC227.01c	dsc4	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.117958509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795005	2543396	2540779	279818	277298	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC19F8.06c	dsc4	meu22	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.69971355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795006	2543396	2539925	279818	276469	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC16H5.13	dsc4	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.257600915	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795007	2543396	2540800	279818	277319	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC409.20c	dsc4	psh3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811274566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795008	2543396	2540152	279818	276688	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC12C2.03c	dsc4	SPBC12C2.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.431835862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795009	2543396	2539159	279818	275731	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC1235.01	dsc4	SPCC1235.01	-	SPCC320.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.304876398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795010	2543396	2542472	279818	278933	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC9E9.13	dsc4	wos2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.913904703	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795011	2543396	2539239	279818	275809	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC1020.10	dsc4	oca2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.852865385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795012	2543396	2540725	279818	277248	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC215.14c	dsc4	vps20	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.190610299	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795013	2543396	2538756	279818	275339	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC1795.10c	dsc4	SPCC1795.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513876287	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795014	2543396	2540829	279818	277347	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC800.09	dsc4	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.849410279	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795015	2543396	2542403	279818	278867	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC19A8.05c	dsc4	sst4	-	vps27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.321874597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795016	2543396	2543437	279818	279857	SPAC4D7.11	SPAPB1A10.14	dsc4	pof15	-	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57528024	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795017	2543396	2541404	279818	277913	SPAC4D7.11	SPBPB2B2.18	dsc4	SPBPB2B2.18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.029603808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795018	2543396	2539182	279818	275753	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC16A11.16c	dsc4	rpn1302	-	rpn13|rpn13b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.262468398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795019	2543396	2541380	279818	277891	SPAC4D7.11	SPBPB2B2.13	dsc4	gal1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.179269555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795020	2543396	2540516	279818	277044	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC21C3.01c	dsc4	vps13a	-	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575195543	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795021	2543396	2540333	279818	276863	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC21B10.07	dsc4	SPBC21B10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.3857973	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795022	2543396	2542442	279818	278904	SPAC4D7.11	SPACUNK12.02c	dsc4	cmk1	-	CaMK-I|SPAC25D11.02C	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.264373426	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795023	2543396	2539920	279818	276464	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC119.08	dsc4	pmk1	-	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.704961786	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795024	2543396	2543525	279818	279943	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC4A8.14	dsc4	SPAC4A8.14	-	prs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189537621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795025	2543396	2538792	279818	275373	SPAC4D7.11	SPCP1E11.10	dsc4	SPCP1E11.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.823959385	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795026	2543396	2539169	279818	275740	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC1235.11	dsc4	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.281867986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795027	2543396	2543220	279818	279648	SPAC4D7.11	SPAPB21F2.02	dsc4	SPAPB21F2.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.325670158	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795028	2543396	2541709	279818	278204	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC3C7.02c	dsc4	pil2	-	SPAC3C7.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.362318198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795029	2543396	2543327	279818	279750	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC1D4.06c	dsc4	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.12097509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795030	2543396	2540828	279818	277346	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC4B4.06	dsc4	vps25	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.454981353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795031	2543396	3361517	279818	280593	SPAC4D7.11	SPAP11E10.02c	dsc4	mam3	-	SPAPB1A10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.932121539	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795032	2543396	2541050	279818	277565	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC428.05c	dsc4	arg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.900482242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795033	2543396	2542943	279818	279384	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC1348.03	dsc4	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.67074315	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795034	2543396	2540208	279818	276741	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC9B6.03	dsc4	SPBC9B6.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.045307125	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795035	2543396	2541062	279818	277577	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC660.11	dsc4	tcg1	-	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.631403025	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795036	2543396	2540787	279818	277306	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC1921.07c	dsc4	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.784055218	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795037	9406926	2542816	1028289	279263	SPCC1393.14	SPAC4G8.11c	ten1	atp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.449922472	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795038	9406926	2539478	1028289	276041	SPCC1393.14	SPCC550.07	ten1	SPCC550.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.317472636	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795039	9406926	2538852	1028289	275433	SPCC1393.14	SPCC4E9.01c	ten1	rec11	-	SPCC550.16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.946929431	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795040	9406926	2539205	1028289	275775	SPCC1393.14	SPCC4B3.15	ten1	mid1	-	dmf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704938408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795041	9406926	2539460	1028289	276023	SPCC1393.14	SPCC4B3.13	ten1	SPCC4B3.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.329659348	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795042	2541789	2539050	278281	275623	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC11E10.08	iwr1	rik1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.205806005	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795043	2541789	2542895	278281	279339	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC13G6.10c	iwr1	asl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820110294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795044	2541789	2539841	278281	276389	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC17D1.05	iwr1	SPBC17D1.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.705935916	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795045	2541789	2540105	278281	276642	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC106.04	iwr1	ada1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808308854	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795046	2541789	2539405	278281	275970	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC553.03	iwr1	pex1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.510308573	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795047	2541789	2543617	278281	280031	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC4A8.10	iwr1	SPAC4A8.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.049841255	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795048	2541789	2542598	278281	279052	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC6G10.08	iwr1	idp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.559964289	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795049	2541789	2543637	278281	280051	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC3H8.02	iwr1	csr102	-	SPAC3H8.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.147998744	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795050	2541789	2539566	278281	276126	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC736.13	iwr1	SPCC736.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194877807	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795051	2541789	2539430	278281	275994	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC417.12	iwr1	SPCC417.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152755398	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795052	2541789	2541426	278281	277931	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC227.06	iwr1	SPAC227.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.985111814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795053	2541789	2540026	278281	276570	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC16D10.08c	iwr1	hsp104	-	SPBC16D10.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.923095833	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795054	2541789	2543287	278281	279712	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC9E9.05	iwr1	SPAC9E9.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.825096293	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795055	2541789	2539167	278281	275738	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC1281.08	iwr1	wtf11	-	meu24	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.81926965	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795056	2541789	2541818	278281	278309	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC11G7.02	iwr1	pub1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.976878855	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795057	2541789	2542965	278281	279405	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC3G6.04	iwr1	rnp24	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.557119581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795058	2541789	2539582	278281	276141	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC594.07c	iwr1	bqt3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.813843942	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795059	2541789	2543575	278281	279990	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC644.13c	iwr1	SPAC644.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.100489183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795060	2541789	2542378	278281	278842	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC1805.04	iwr1	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.308419935	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795061	2541789	2540994	278281	277510	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC337.11	iwr1	SPBC337.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.668062197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795062	2541789	2539282	278281	275850	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC622.06c	iwr1	SPCC622.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.563565017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795063	2541789	2541621	278281	278118	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC29A4.17c	iwr1	SPAC29A4.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.928619389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795064	2541789	2538896	278281	275474	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC584.11c	iwr1	SPCC584.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.102724552	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795065	2541789	3361119	278281	280195	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC663.07c	iwr1	SPCC663.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982747943	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795066	2541789	2541585	278281	278082	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC14C4.05c	iwr1	man1	-	heh2|mug61	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.945732517	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795067	2541789	2538857	278281	275437	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC1442.05c	iwr1	SPCC1442.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201080684	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795068	2541789	2541104	278281	277619	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC6B1.03c	iwr1	SPBC6B1.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991008149	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795069	2541789	2541117	278281	277632	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC646.13	iwr1	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.64287479	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795070	2541789	2541051	278281	277566	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC3E7.08c	iwr1	rad13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.126475077	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795071	2541789	2540161	278281	276696	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC13E7.03c	iwr1	SPBC13E7.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.403112979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795072	2541789	2539734	278281	276286	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC1604.16c	iwr1	SPBC1604.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.842848585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795073	2541789	2540168	278281	276703	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC1683.06c	iwr1	SPBC1683.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.820838147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795074	2541789	2543652	278281	280066	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC4H3.03c	iwr1	SPAC4H3.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.925126985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795075	2541789	2540402	278281	276930	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC30D10.05c	iwr1	SPBC30D10.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.458770775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795076	2541789	2543103	278281	279535	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC3F10.09	iwr1	SPAC3F10.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039710344	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795077	2541789	2539226	278281	275796	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC16C4.20c	iwr1	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.075303725	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795078	2541789	2539420	278281	275985	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC970.07c	iwr1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.037412079	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795079	2541789	2541208	278281	277722	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC887.04c	iwr1	lub1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.568573452	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795080	2541789	2539443	278281	276006	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC736.02	iwr1	SPCC736.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193470417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795081	2541789	2542053	278281	278532	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC2F3.07c	iwr1	SPAC2F3.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984542857	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795082	2541789	2541682	278281	278178	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC15F9.02	iwr1	seh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.924174621	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795083	2541789	2543230	278281	279658	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC823.13c	iwr1	SPAC823.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.386791104	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795084	2541789	2542709	278281	279162	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC26F1.08c	iwr1	SPAC26F1.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.867646521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795085	2541789	2539472	278281	276035	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC794.03	iwr1	SPCC794.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982058499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795086	2541789	2543453	278281	279873	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC3G9.03	iwr1	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.333112984	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795087	2541789	2541503	278281	278005	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC22A12.01c	iwr1	pso2	-	SPAC56F8.17c|snm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.634022957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795088	2541789	2540313	278281	276843	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC337.04	iwr1	ppk27	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987221918	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795089	2541789	2541541	278281	278041	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC1F7.11c	iwr1	SPAC1F7.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.992025566	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795090	2541789	2543542	278281	279959	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC823.09c	iwr1	SPAC823.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.407495755	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795091	2541789	2543030	278281	279466	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC12B10.10	iwr1	nod1	-	SPAC12B10.10	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.509763273	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795092	2541789	2543048	278281	279483	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC3F10.02c	iwr1	trk1	-	sptrk	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.3849947	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795093	2541789	2539988	278281	276532	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC1271.05c	iwr1	SPBC1271.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.662132251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795094	2541789	2542022	278281	278505	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC23A1.03	iwr1	apt1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.091680785	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795095	2541789	3361342	278281	280418	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC16D10.07c	iwr1	sir2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.513178979	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795096	2541789	2543609	278281	280023	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC630.05	iwr1	gyp7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.203538906	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795097	2541789	2539792	278281	276342	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC1271.14	iwr1	SPBC1271.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.092983055	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795098	2541789	2541707	278281	278202	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC29E6.01	iwr1	pof11	-	SPAC30.05|mug156	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.747425466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795099	2541789	2539823	278281	276373	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC16A3.18	iwr1	cip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.461771233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795100	2541789	2543296	278281	279721	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC9E9.03	iwr1	leu2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.56327772	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795101	2541789	2541105	278281	277620	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC685.02	iwr1	exo5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.446520678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795102	2541789	2543641	278281	280055	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC3H5.08c	iwr1	SPAC3H5.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.203676693	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795103	2541789	3361316	278281	280392	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC2D10.03c	iwr1	SPBC2D10.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.619312574	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795104	2541789	2541295	278281	277807	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC947.09	iwr1	hsp3103	-	SPBC947.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.048588597	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795105	2541789	2538906	278281	275483	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC1259.03	iwr1	rpa12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.098286721	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795106	2541789	2542253	278281	278723	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC17H9.04c	iwr1	SPAC17H9.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.001179985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795107	2541789	2542213	278281	278687	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC3G6.13c	iwr1	rpl4101	-	rpl41-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.333691519	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795108	2541789	2540825	278281	277343	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC428.08c	iwr1	clr4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.84055353	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795109	2541789	2539310	278281	275877	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC285.17	iwr1	spp27	-	uaf30	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.311098778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795110	2541789	2542568	278281	279024	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC1952.02	iwr1	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.707512938	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795111	2541789	2542311	278281	278777	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC16A10.05c	iwr1	dad1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.395276387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795112	2541789	2543514	278281	279932	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC4D7.03	iwr1	pop2	-	sud1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.564719563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795113	2541789	2542952	278281	279392	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC12B10.05	iwr1	icp55	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455251251	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795114	2541789	2539051	278281	275624	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC1183.11	iwr1	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.810371808	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795115	2541789	2539705	278281	276258	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC1105.10	iwr1	rav1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.04862271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795116	2541789	2541741	278281	278235	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC20G4.02c	iwr1	fus1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.288395802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795117	2541789	2541288	278281	277801	SPAC23H4.08	SPBP35G2.04c	iwr1	SPBP35G2.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.979436083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795118	2541789	2541982	278281	278467	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC23A1.06c	iwr1	cmk2	-	mkp2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934519253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795119	2541789	2539845	278281	276393	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC12C2.02c	iwr1	ste20	-	ste16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.020981864	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795120	2541789	2543445	278281	279865	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC4F10.13c	iwr1	mpd2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.153703083	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795121	2541789	2542249	278281	278719	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC30D11.14c	iwr1	SPAC30D11.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.441055085	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795122	2541789	2538770	278281	275353	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC1753.02c	iwr1	git3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455153087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795123	2541789	2540041	278281	276580	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC1198.03c	iwr1	SPBC1198.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.410213368	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795124	2541789	2538811	278281	275392	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC330.03c	iwr1	SPCC330.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.039284658	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795125	2541789	2542866	278281	279311	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC9E9.17c	iwr1	SPAC9E9.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036168198	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795126	2541789	2540673	278281	277198	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC1D7.03	iwr1	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.384599233	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795127	2541789	2542420	278281	278883	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC19D5.03	iwr1	cid1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.969435843	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795128	2541789	2541943	278281	278430	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC222.07c	iwr1	hri2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.755589802	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795129	2541789	2541701	278281	278197	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC1296.03c	iwr1	sxa2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.984272128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795130	2541789	2539454	278281	276017	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC622.15c	iwr1	SPCC622.15c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.030309017	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795131	2541789	2541166	278281	277681	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC725.15	iwr1	ura5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036411122	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795132	2541789	2543231	278281	279659	SPAC23H4.08	SPAPB8E5.08	iwr1	SPAPB8E5.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.869149322	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795133	2541789	2541929	278281	278417	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC23C4.12	iwr1	hhp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.307669839	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795134	2541789	2543246	278281	279674	SPAC23H4.08	SPAPB8E5.05	iwr1	mfm1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096581994	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795135	2541789	2538871	278281	275450	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC1259.14c	iwr1	meu27	-	B8647-6	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.274304585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795136	2541789	2541352	278281	277863	SPAC23H4.08	SPBPJ4664.03	iwr1	mfm3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.983608668	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795137	2541789	3361455	278281	280531	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC1782.01	iwr1	ecm29	-	SPAPYUG7.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.354498705	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795138	2541789	2543643	278281	280057	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC3G9.07c	iwr1	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.085180581	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795139	2541789	2539586	278281	276145	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC70.08c	iwr1	SPCC70.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870677894	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795140	2541789	2540086	278281	276624	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC16H5.12c	iwr1	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.184552937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795141	2541789	2540231	278281	276763	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC336.14c	iwr1	ppk26	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.749950967	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795142	2541789	2539111	278281	275683	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC417.11c	iwr1	SPCC417.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.991794571	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795143	2541789	2539667	278281	276222	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC13G1.08c	iwr1	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.37920475	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795144	2541789	2542126	278281	278602	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC1B3.05	iwr1	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63158294	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795145	2541789	2540628	278281	277154	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC25B2.08	iwr1	SPBC25B2.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097547996	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795146	2541789	2542874	278281	279319	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC20H4.09	iwr1	SPAC20H4.09	-	SPAC145.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.036667563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795147	2541789	2541828	278281	278319	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC22H12.05c	iwr1	fsc1	-	SPAC22H12.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.81823063	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795148	2541789	2538945	278281	275519	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC1739.06c	iwr1	SPCC1739.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.721821798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795149	2541789	2538837	278281	275418	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC4B3.03c	iwr1	SPCC4B3.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873654727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795150	2541789	2540675	278281	277200	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC21H7.07c	iwr1	his5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.341965731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795151	2541789	2540961	278281	277477	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC36B7.03	iwr1	sec63	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.273372188	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795152	2541789	2540943	278281	277459	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC36B7.02	iwr1	SPBC36B7.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.719999848	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795153	2541789	2539217	278281	275787	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC1223.03c	iwr1	gut2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.866609185	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795154	2541789	2540224	278281	276757	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC32H8.06	iwr1	mug93	-	pi018|SPACTOKYO_453.18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.815242858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795155	2541789	2542431	278281	278893	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC1A6.01c	iwr1	SPAC1A6.01c	-	SPAC23C4.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.475948092	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795156	2541789	2542398	278281	278862	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC1805.03c	iwr1	trm13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.3879971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795157	2541789	2539481	278281	276044	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC622.16c	iwr1	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.007896613	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795158	2541789	2539027	278281	275600	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC1322.08	iwr1	srk1	-	mkp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.001894891	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795159	2541789	2539953	278281	276497	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC1709.11c	iwr1	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.474173748	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795160	2541789	2543080	278281	279513	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC3A11.10c	iwr1	SPAC3A11.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.664577622	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795161	2541789	2542919	278281	279360	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC6C3.08	iwr1	nas6	-	SPAC6C3.08	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.774339697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795162	2541789	2542056	278281	278535	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC6G9.14	iwr1	SPAC6G9.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.154042889	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795163	2541789	2539715	278281	276268	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC1778.09	iwr1	SPBC1778.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868612865	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795164	2541789	2542055	278281	278534	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC6G9.03c	iwr1	mug183	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.458722464	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795165	2541789	2540387	278281	276915	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC24C6.04	iwr1	SPBC24C6.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.26182195	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795166	2541789	2538949	278281	275523	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC320.03	iwr1	SPCC320.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.808990862	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795167	2541789	2540990	278281	277506	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC36B7.06c	iwr1	mug20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.92758564	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795168	2541789	2543443	278281	279863	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC3H1.12c	iwr1	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.977239297	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795169	2541789	2543119	278281	279551	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC3A11.07	iwr1	nde2	-	SPAC3A11.07	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.233386277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795170	2541789	2539936	278281	276480	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC1685.05	iwr1	SPBC1685.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.494377905	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795171	2541789	2542125	278281	278601	SPAC23H4.08	SPAP8A3.03	iwr1	SPAP8A3.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.338092563	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795172	2541789	2538708	278281	275292	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC594.01	iwr1	SPCC594.01	-	SPCC736.16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.512436323	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795173	2541789	2543381	278281	279803	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC630.09c	iwr1	mug58	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.024993798	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795174	2541789	2540201	278281	276734	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC13A2.04c	iwr1	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.817331792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795175	2541789	2540967	278281	277483	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC36B7.08c	iwr1	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.735872701	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795176	2541789	2539363	278281	275929	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC613.02	iwr1	SPCC613.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.145282513	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795177	2541789	2541283	278281	277796	SPAC23H4.08	SPBP8B7.02	iwr1	rng9	-	SPBP8B7.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.030838896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795178	2541789	2541266	278281	277780	SPAC23H4.08	SPBP16F5.05c	iwr1	yar1	-	SPBP16F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.807351939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795179	2541789	2541186	278281	277700	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC725.01	iwr1	SPBC725.01	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.455526214	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795180	2541789	2539344	278281	275910	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC1672.09	iwr1	SPCC1672.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.868404544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795181	2541789	2540882	278281	277399	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC4F6.08c	iwr1	mrpl39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.686643292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795182	2541789	2540687	278281	277212	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC21D10.08c	iwr1	SPBC21D10.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.046382007	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795183	2541789	2539812	278281	276362	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC1347.02	iwr1	fkbp39	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.45414883	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795184	2541789	2541378	278281	277889	SPAC23H4.08	SPBP8B7.21	iwr1	ubp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.559015559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795185	2541789	3361134	278281	280210	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC737.09c	iwr1	hmt1	-	SPCC74.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.988792183	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795186	2541789	2540691	278281	277216	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC20F10.05	iwr1	nrl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.101164071	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795187	2541789	2538848	278281	275429	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC613.12c	iwr1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.302219792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795188	2541789	2543493	278281	279913	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC4G8.08	iwr1	SPAC4G8.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.335370957	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795189	2541789	2539908	278281	276454	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC13E7.06	iwr1	msd1	-	mug172	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.197971877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795190	2541789	2540910	278281	277426	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC577.02	iwr1	rpl3801	-	rpl38-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.816676777	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795191	2541789	2541670	278281	278166	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC24H6.13	iwr1	SPAC24H6.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.274417624	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795192	2541789	2540916	278281	277432	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC354.15	iwr1	fap1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.872870499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795193	2541789	2540959	278281	277475	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC365.12c	iwr1	ish1	-	isp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.339754549	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795194	2541789	2541786	278281	278278	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC22F3.08c	iwr1	rok1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.716866814	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795195	2541789	2539362	278281	275928	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC18B5.10c	iwr1	SPCC18B5.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.159667827	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795196	2541789	2541175	278281	277689	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC839.13c	iwr1	rpl1601	-	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.24297627	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795197	2541789	2543670	278281	280084	SPAC23H4.08	SPAPB1E7.06c	iwr1	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.812474168	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795198	2541789	2543567	278281	279983	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC890.03	iwr1	ppk16	-	mug92	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.173644132	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795199	2541789	2541909	278281	278399	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC227.01c	iwr1	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.873380986	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795200	2541789	2539108	278281	275680	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC1223.02	iwr1	nmt1	-	thi3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.206494806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795201	2541789	2542883	278281	279328	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC1486.04c	iwr1	alm1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811493716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795202	2541789	2540881	278281	277398	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC577.14c	iwr1	spa1	-	spa	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.100091225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795203	2541789	2539296	278281	275864	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC1235.03	iwr1	cue2	-	SPCC1235.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.413280103	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795204	2541789	2540960	278281	277476	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC3D6.02	iwr1	but2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.342150716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795205	2541789	2542075	278281	278552	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC27D7.06	iwr1	etf1	-	SPAC27D7.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201663363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795206	2541789	2540725	278281	277248	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC215.14c	iwr1	vps20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.769767091	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795207	2541789	2541367	278281	277878	SPAC23H4.08	SPBP8B7.13	iwr1	vac7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.84910501	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795208	2541789	2541114	278281	277629	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC582.09	iwr1	pex11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.71951468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795209	2541789	2540164	278281	276699	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC1683.03c	iwr1	SPBC1683.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.972890095	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795210	2541789	2542076	278281	278553	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC29A4.19c	iwr1	cta5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.611963614	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795211	2541789	2542326	278281	278792	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC16C9.07	iwr1	pom2	-	SPAC2G11.01|mug189|ppk5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098662147	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795212	2541789	2543091	278281	279524	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC12G12.15	iwr1	sif3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.986399536	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795213	2541789	2540211	278281	276744	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC947.15c	iwr1	nde1	-	SPBC947.15c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.74035143	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795214	2541789	2539188	278281	275759	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC1827.04	iwr1	vms1	-	SPCC1827.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.441804499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795215	2541789	2541380	278281	277891	SPAC23H4.08	SPBPB2B2.13	iwr1	gal1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.201490374	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795216	2541789	2540182	278281	276715	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC16G5.06	iwr1	SPBC16G5.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.8163792	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795217	2541789	2540297	278281	276828	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC24C6.08c	iwr1	bhd1	-	bhd	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.133119927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795218	2541789	2539488	278281	276051	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC645.08c	iwr1	snd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.506752061	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795219	2541789	2542262	278281	278731	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC17C9.10	iwr1	stm1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.617704427	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795220	2541789	2539207	278281	275777	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC285.09c	iwr1	cgs2	-	pde1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.1971114	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795221	2541789	3361476	278281	280552	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC16A10.04	iwr1	rho4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462275909	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795222	2541789	2538694	278281	275279	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC191.09c	iwr1	gst1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.938384377	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795223	2541789	2540422	278281	276950	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC27.08c	iwr1	sua1	-	SPBC28F2.01c|asp1|met3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.818709634	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795224	2541789	2541356	278281	277867	SPAC23H4.08	SPBP35G2.12	iwr1	SPBP35G2.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.516349532	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795225	2541789	2540563	278281	277090	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC25H2.09	iwr1	SPBC25H2.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.660641799	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795226	2541789	2542904	278281	279348	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC144.11	iwr1	rps1102	-	rps11|rps11-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.152516432	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795227	2541789	2542186	278281	278661	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC17C9.14	iwr1	SPAC17C9.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.508289781	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795228	2541789	2540146	278281	276683	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC17A3.06	iwr1	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.859516499	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795229	2541789	2538840	278281	275421	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC736.07c	iwr1	SPCC736.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.920455459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795230	2541789	2539189	278281	275760	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC1682.16	iwr1	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.981823542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795231	2541789	2541941	278281	278428	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC20H4.03c	iwr1	tfs1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.643837213	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795232	2541789	2542059	278281	278537	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC328.06	iwr1	ubp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.709759924	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795233	2541789	3361410	278281	280486	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC1527.01	iwr1	mok11	-	SPAC23D3.15	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.414026357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795234	2541789	2539181	278281	275752	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC622.14	iwr1	SPCC622.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.198497014	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795235	2541789	2541806	278281	278297	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC4G8.13c	iwr1	prz1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.220574037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795236	2541789	3361481	278281	280557	SPAC23H4.08	SPAPB24D3.05c	iwr1	SPAPB24D3.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.670402722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795237	2541789	2539583	278281	276142	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC777.04	iwr1	SPCC777.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.878040978	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795238	2541789	2541334	278281	277845	SPAC23H4.08	SPBP4H10.18c	iwr1	SPBP4H10.18c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.512125898	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795239	2541789	2541478	278281	277980	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC2F7.17	iwr1	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.124448743	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795240	2541789	2542111	278281	278587	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC1687.14c	iwr1	SPAC1687.14c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.178861406	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795241	2541789	2540372	278281	276901	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC31F10.03	iwr1	SPBC31F10.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.462322678	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795242	2541789	2543448	278281	279868	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC3H5.07	iwr1	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098584667	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795243	2541789	2540859	278281	277376	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC4C3.09	iwr1	SPBC4C3.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.412734803	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795244	2541789	2538822	278281	275403	SPAC23H4.08	SPCC1840.02c	iwr1	bgs4	-	cwg1|orb11|pbr1|sph1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.194116672	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795245	2541789	2540310	278281	276840	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC29B5.04c	iwr1	SPBC29B5.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.928679157	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795246	2541789	3361512	278281	280588	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC3C7.01c	iwr1	sac12	-	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.074865953	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795247	2541789	2541236	278281	277750	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC887.11	iwr1	pus2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.411353308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795248	2541789	2540787	278281	277306	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC1921.07c	iwr1	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.385516269	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795249	2541789	2542571	278281	279027	SPAC23H4.08	SPAC589.02c	iwr1	med13	-	spTrap240|srb9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.265341335	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795250	2541789	2540736	278281	277259	SPAC23H4.08	SPBC19F8.02	iwr1	SPBC19F8.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927535508	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795251	2540350	2539249	276879	275819	SPBC317.01	SPCC1450.05c	mbx2	rox3	pvg4	med19	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.190653277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795252	2540350	2542555	276879	279012	SPBC317.01	SPAC1952.06c	mbx2	SPAC1952.06c	pvg4	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.714783778	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795253	2540350	2539845	276879	276393	SPBC317.01	SPBC12C2.02c	mbx2	ste20	pvg4	ste16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.802797559	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795254	2540350	2541900	276879	278390	SPBC317.01	SPAC23H4.17c	mbx2	srb10	pvg4	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.443459714	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795255	2541437	2539774	277942	276325	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC17A3.10	sap114	pas4	-	pi036	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.07300577	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795256	2541437	2539147	277942	275719	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCC622.12c	sap114	gdh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.853032509	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795257	2541437	2538721	277942	275305	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCC1494.10	sap114	adn3	-	SPCC70.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.791188494	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795258	2541437	2542577	277942	279033	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC19G12.15c	sap114	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.916870666	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795259	2541437	2542598	277942	279052	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC6G10.08	sap114	idp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.332075801	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795260	2541437	2541343	277942	277854	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBPB2B2.19c	sap114	SPBPB2B2.19c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.802027896	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795261	2541437	2540235	277942	276767	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC336.13c	sap114	SPBC336.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.936444897	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795262	2541437	2539566	277942	276126	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCC736.13	sap114	SPCC736.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.177696735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795263	2541437	2539452	277942	276015	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCC70.03c	sap114	SPCC70.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.641454276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795264	2541437	2542066	277942	278543	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC227.05	sap114	SPAC227.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.449372788	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795265	2541437	2541015	277942	277530	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC409.08	sap114	SPBC409.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.352409022	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795266	2541437	2543064	277942	279497	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC3G6.01	sap114	hrp3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.633235047	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795267	2541437	2540131	277942	276668	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC1778.05c	sap114	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.635342697	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795268	2541437	2540863	277942	277380	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC56F2.03	sap114	SPBC56F2.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.934261775	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795269	2541437	2540528	277942	277056	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC18H10.04c	sap114	sce3	-	tif48	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.345339727	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795270	2541437	2541621	277942	278118	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC29A4.17c	sap114	SPAC29A4.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.307174735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795271	2541437	2539930	277942	276474	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC1198.11c	sap114	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.072358128	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795272	2541437	3361561	277942	280637	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC11E3.01c	sap114	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.219626295	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795273	2541437	2542798	277942	279246	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC13C5.06c	sap114	mug121	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.060463178	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795274	2541437	2541117	277942	277632	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC646.13	sap114	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.697685882	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795275	2541437	2541345	277942	277856	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBP35G2.07	sap114	ilv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.480886971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795276	2541437	2541633	277942	278129	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC664.01c	sap114	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.804347086	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795277	2541437	2540474	277942	277002	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC26H8.09c	sap114	snf59	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.135065579	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795278	2541437	2539734	277942	276286	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC1604.16c	sap114	SPBC1604.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.259450787	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795279	2541437	2540168	277942	276703	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC1683.06c	sap114	SPBC1683.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.738734067	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795280	2541437	5802945	277942	858083	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC19G12.16c	sap114	adg2	-	SPAC23A1.01c|mug46	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.188748939	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795281	2541437	2540686	277942	277211	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC21D10.10	sap114	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.58724936	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795282	2541437	2539201	277942	275772	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCC188.09c	sap114	pfl4	-	SPCC188.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.800264859	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795283	2541437	2542103	277942	278579	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC31G5.11	sap114	pac2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.066024253	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795284	2541437	2541235	277942	277749	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC8D2.12c	sap114	SPBC8D2.12c	-	pI053	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.00944236	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795285	2541437	2539226	277942	275796	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCC16C4.20c	sap114	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.646738442	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795286	2541437	2540975	277942	277491	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC354.12	sap114	gpd3	-	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.362386033	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795287	2541437	2542468	277942	278929	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC1D4.09c	sap114	rtf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.291958651	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795288	2541437	2541313	277942	277825	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBP26C9.02c	sap114	car1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.795185477	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795289	2541437	2541471	277942	277973	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC1F5.03c	sap114	SPAC1F5.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.583068362	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795290	2541437	2541498	277942	278000	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC227.10	sap114	SPAC227.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.384637603	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795291	2541437	2539564	277942	276125	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCC550.12	sap114	arp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.522422569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795292	2541437	2542689	277942	279142	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC29B12.04	sap114	snz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.513750116	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795293	2541437	2542569	277942	279025	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC186.08c	sap114	SPAC186.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.448078582	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795294	2541437	2539334	277942	275900	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCC285.05	sap114	SPCC285.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.038306722	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795295	2541437	2541419	277942	277925	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC1F3.07c	sap114	rsc58	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.945416711	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795296	2541437	2540220	277942	276753	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC337.03	sap114	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.056506197	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795297	2541437	2539797	277942	276347	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC16G5.14c	sap114	rps3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.310960937	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795298	2541437	2541119	277942	277634	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC651.11c	sap114	apm3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.362367489	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795299	2541437	2543636	277942	280050	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC3H8.08c	sap114	SPAC3H8.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.567438735	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795300	2541437	2543547	277942	279964	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC926.02	sap114	SPAC926.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987155408	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795301	2541437	2542567	277942	279023	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC328.05	sap114	SPAC328.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.100289417	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795302	2541437	2541346	277942	277857	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBP8B7.08c	sap114	ppm1	-	SPBP8B7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.324728194	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795303	2541437	2540727	277942	277250	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC1921.03c	sap114	mex67	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.721701858	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795304	2541437	2541323	277942	277835	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBP35G2.14	sap114	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.23947121	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795305	2541437	2542277	277942	278746	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC17A5.02c	sap114	dbr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.900375556	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795306	2541437	2540467	277942	276995	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC2G2.07c	sap114	mug178	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.609330138	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795307	2541437	2543308	277942	279732	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC694.04c	sap114	SPAC694.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.978033032	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795308	2541437	2540595	277942	277121	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC21C3.02c	sap114	dep1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.143509728	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795309	2541437	2542141	277942	278617	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC17C9.05c	sap114	pmc3	-	med27|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.587249082	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795310	2541437	2542146	277942	278622	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC1B3.10c	sap114	SPAC1B3.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.811297276	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795311	2541437	3361316	277942	280392	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC2D10.03c	sap114	SPBC2D10.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.016837094	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795312	2541437	2539244	277942	275814	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCC1672.06c	sap114	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.618949381	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795313	2541437	2543563	277942	279979	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC664.02c	sap114	arp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.888210925	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795314	2541437	2543426	277942	279846	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC631.02	sap114	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.707658746	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795315	2541437	2539352	277942	275918	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCC188.07	sap114	ccq1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.972913179	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795316	2541437	2538700	277942	275285	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCC645.13	sap114	SPCC645.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.362215404	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795317	2541437	2538906	277942	275483	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCC1259.03	sap114	rpa12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.031137169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795318	2541437	2539092	277942	275664	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCC1259.08	sap114	SPCC1259.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.899625163	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795319	2541437	2538845	277942	275426	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCC1235.13	sap114	ght6	-	meu12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57029756	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795320	2541437	2542845	277942	279291	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC824.04	sap114	SPAC824.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.639867884	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795321	2541437	2542213	277942	278687	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC3G6.13c	sap114	rpl4101	-	rpl41-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.961438569	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795322	2541437	2541834	277942	278325	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC824.08	sap114	gda1	-	gdp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321085934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795323	2541437	2541246	277942	277760	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC8E4.02c	sap114	SPBC8E4.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.228256176	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795324	2541437	2540964	277942	277480	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC365.16	sap114	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.632197542	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795325	2541437	2542568	277942	279024	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC1952.02	sap114	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.379284468	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795326	2541437	3361461	277942	280537	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC11H11.01	sap114	sst6	-	cps23	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.853196565	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795327	2541437	2541885	277942	278375	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC22H10.03c	sap114	kap114	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.009999671	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795328	2541437	2542679	277942	279132	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC12B10.07	sap114	acp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.128579927	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795329	2541437	2542964	277942	279404	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC12G12.07c	sap114	SPAC12G12.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.888185242	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795330	2541437	2541801	277942	278292	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC2F7.08c	sap114	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.78757363	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795331	2541437	2540892	277942	277408	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC530.01	sap114	gyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.004515389	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795332	2541437	2542513	277942	278971	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC1952.05	sap114	gcn5	-	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.095064277	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795333	2541437	2541776	277942	278270	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC23H3.05c	sap114	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.348059087	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795334	2541437	2539628	277942	276185	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC1604.03c	sap114	SPBC1604.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.930174416	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795335	2541437	2540647	277942	277172	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC18H10.07	sap114	SPBC18H10.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.718141271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795336	2541437	2541038	277942	277553	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC29A10.01	sap114	ccr1	-	SPBC365.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.243862327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795337	2541437	2540338	277942	276867	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC2G2.13c	sap114	dcd1	-	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.655931327	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795338	2541437	2540922	277942	277438	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC36.10	sap114	SPBC36.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.189354436	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795339	2541437	2541889	277942	278379	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC2F7.03c	sap114	pom1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.146765246	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795340	2541437	2540886	277942	277403	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC4F6.10	sap114	vps901	-	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.387957688	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795341	2541437	2541911	277942	278401	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC212.04c	sap114	SPAC212.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.995997068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795342	2541437	2542817	277942	279264	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC13G6.02c	sap114	rps101	-	rps1-1|rps3a-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.453553934	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795343	2541437	2541435	277942	277940	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC2E1P5.02c	sap114	mug109	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.404843142	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795344	2541437	2539454	277942	276017	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCC622.15c	sap114	SPCC622.15c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922653872	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795345	2541437	2541496	277942	277998	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC23D3.09	sap114	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.145739459	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795346	2541437	2543667	277942	280081	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC4H3.02c	sap114	swc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.972767223	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795347	2541437	2542452	277942	278913	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC1D4.02c	sap114	SPAC1D4.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.351000514	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795348	2541437	2540452	277942	276980	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC2A9.11c	sap114	iss9	-	SPBC2A9.11c|SPBC2D10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.978220971	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795349	2541437	2540831	277942	277349	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC428.02c	sap114	eca39	-	SPBC582.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.444690201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795350	2541437	2540231	277942	276763	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC336.14c	sap114	ppk26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.381683466	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795351	2541437	2538769	277942	275352	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCC126.04c	sap114	sgf73	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.586513537	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795352	2541437	2539667	277942	276222	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC13G1.08c	sap114	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.567429968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795353	2541437	2542528	277942	278986	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC1B3.08	sap114	SPAC1B3.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.681700496	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795354	2541437	2539482	277942	276045	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCC417.06c	sap114	mug27	-	ppk35|slk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.900337985	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795355	2541437	2540943	277942	277459	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC36B7.02	sap114	SPBC36B7.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.870617422	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795356	2541437	2542867	277942	279312	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC343.16	sap114	lys2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.781288321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795357	2541437	2543301	277942	279726	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC977.17	sap114	SPAC977.17	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.194640292	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795358	2541437	2542549	277942	279006	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC19A8.11c	sap114	SPAC19A8.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.31355631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795359	2541437	2539408	277942	275973	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCC576.12c	sap114	mhf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.699586011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795360	2541437	2539215	277942	275785	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCC285.16c	sap114	msh6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.987876847	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795361	2541437	5802861	277942	857999	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC1D4.01	sap114	tls1	-	SPAC1D4.01|SPAC1F3.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.389369434	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795362	2541437	2540335	277942	276865	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC30B4.03c	sap114	adn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.391748474	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795363	2541437	2543443	277942	279863	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC3H1.12c	sap114	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.30257225	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795364	2541437	2541389	277942	277900	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBPB2B2.09c	sap114	SPBPB2B2.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.812951159	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795365	2541437	2543307	277942	279731	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC694.05c	sap114	rps2502	-	rps25|rps25-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.8472165	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795366	2541437	2543315	277942	279739	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC6B12.07c	sap114	SPAC6B12.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.155326129	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795367	2541437	2541614	277942	278111	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC29A4.20	sap114	elp3	-	kat9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.450240646	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795368	2541437	2540687	277942	277212	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC21D10.08c	sap114	SPBC21D10.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.8998968	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795369	2541437	2542550	277942	279007	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC1B3.02c	sap114	SPAC1B3.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.77707769	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795370	2541437	2541488	277942	277990	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC227.17c	sap114	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.945606313	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795371	2541437	2540193	277942	276726	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC1289.10c	sap114	adn2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.796813411	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795372	2541437	2541337	277942	277848	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBP35G2.13c	sap114	swc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.194240516	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795373	2541437	2540930	277942	277446	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC354.10	sap114	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.552340511	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795374	2541437	2538848	277942	275429	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCC613.12c	sap114	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.875744635	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795375	2541437	3361520	277942	280596	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC1610.02c	sap114	SPAC1610.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.336320204	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795376	2541437	2540643	277942	277168	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC19G7.06	sap114	mbx1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.734769321	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795377	2541437	2542875	277942	279320	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC13G7.02c	sap114	ssa1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.478573145	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795378	2541437	2540918	277942	277434	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC800.02	sap114	whi5	-	mug54	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.038314972	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795379	2541437	2540821	277942	277339	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC800.03	sap114	clr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.154406806	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795380	2541437	2540001	277942	276545	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC1289.13c	sap114	gmh6	-	SPBC1289.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.767908815	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795381	2541437	2542170	277942	278645	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC17G8.13c	sap114	mst2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.874982144	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795382	2541437	2539706	277942	276259	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC16G5.13	sap114	ptf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.859784355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795383	2541437	2540442	277942	276970	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC25B2.04c	sap114	mtg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.352763544	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795384	2541437	2541156	277942	277671	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC685.07c	sap114	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.407221877	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795385	2541437	2538762	277942	275345	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCC306.04c	sap114	set1	-	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.639301663	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795386	2541437	2542619	277942	279073	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC6G10.02c	sap114	tea3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.538785355	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795387	2541437	2539362	277942	275928	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCC18B5.10c	sap114	SPCC18B5.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.142632575	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795388	2541437	2539555	277942	276116	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCC4B3.08	sap114	lsg1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.439790631	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795389	2541437	2540061	277942	276599	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC119.12	sap114	rud3	-	SPBC119.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.878722089	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795390	2541437	2539137	277942	275709	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCC1682.08c	sap114	mcp2	-	SPCC1682.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.050865248	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795391	2541437	2541371	277942	277882	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBP4H10.17c	sap114	SPBP4H10.17c	-	mrps2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.836573583	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795392	2541437	2542881	277942	279326	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC13F5.03c	sap114	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.573572324	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795393	2541437	2539030	277942	275603	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCP1E11.02	sap114	ppk38	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.227778379	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795394	2541437	2540800	277942	277319	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC409.20c	sap114	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.256638689	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795395	2541437	2540152	277942	276688	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC12C2.03c	sap114	SPBC12C2.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.740091758	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795396	2541437	2538717	277942	275301	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCC1235.02	sap114	bio2	-	SPCC320.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.515180399	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795397	2541437	2538966	277942	275540	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCC18.10	sap114	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.648900037	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795398	2541437	2540464	277942	276992	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC23E6.02	sap114	rrp2	-	SPBC23E6.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.927213051	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795399	2541437	2541103	277942	277618	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC651.06	sap114	mug166	-	csa1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.229700879	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795400	2541437	2541432	277942	277937	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC1F5.05c	sap114	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.938820585	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795401	2541437	2540115	277942	276652	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC1778.02	sap114	rap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.406602716	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795402	2541437	2539029	277942	275602	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCC61.05	sap114	SPCC61.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.420069169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795403	2541437	2541470	277942	277972	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAPYUG7.04c	sap114	rpb9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.966862731	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795404	2541437	2540829	277942	277347	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC800.09	sap114	sum2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.008064638	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795405	2541437	2539136	277942	275708	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCC1919.05	sap114	SPCC1919.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.922721212	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795406	2541437	2543128	277942	279560	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC3F10.06c	sap114	rit1	-	SPAC3F10.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.476671068	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795407	2541437	2542051	277942	278530	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC23C11.06c	sap114	SPAC23C11.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321712521	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795408	2541437	2540677	277942	277202	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC21B10.03c	sap114	ath1	-	SPBC21B10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.508957332	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795409	2541437	2539772	277942	276323	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC1734.05c	sap114	spf31	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.878128395	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795410	2541437	2542222	277942	278695	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC31G5.18c	sap114	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.236098357	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795411	2541437	2543437	277942	279857	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAPB1A10.14	sap114	pof15	-	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.941916482	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795412	2541437	2543427	277942	279847	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAPB1A10.15	sap114	arv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.50449491	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795413	2541437	2543228	277942	279656	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC6B12.04c	sap114	SPAC6B12.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.844578329	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795414	2541437	2542826	277942	279273	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC13G6.09	sap114	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.446237926	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795415	2541437	2539668	277942	276223	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC11B10.10c	sap114	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.117370448	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795416	2541437	2542091	277942	278568	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC7D4.02c	sap114	sfp47	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.837055601	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795417	2541437	2539928	277942	276472	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC1604.08c	sap114	imp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.742452888	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795418	2541437	2543516	277942	279934	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC4F10.11	sap114	spn1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.570670011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795419	2541437	2539460	277942	276023	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCC4B3.13	sap114	SPCC4B3.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.843734245	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795420	2541437	2539726	277942	276278	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC13E7.08c	sap114	leo1	-	SPBC13E7.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.204874271	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795421	2541437	2542904	277942	279348	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC144.11	sap114	rps1102	-	rps11|rps11-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.772406734	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795422	2541437	2540380	277942	276909	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC1A4.05	sap114	blt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704975387	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795423	2541437	2542244	277942	278714	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC19G12.13c	sap114	poz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.410648443	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795424	2541437	3361360	277942	280436	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC1652.01	sap114	SPBC1652.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.059293948	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795425	2541437	2539169	277942	275740	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCC1235.11	sap114	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.321942555	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795426	2541437	2541675	277942	278171	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC22F8.12c	sap114	shf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.002478922	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795427	2541437	2540409	277942	276937	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC2D10.11c	sap114	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.532867308	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795428	2541437	2543327	277942	279750	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC1D4.06c	sap114	csk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.196832169	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795429	2541437	2541466	277942	277968	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC14C4.06c	sap114	nab2	-	SPAC14C4.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.645252753	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795430	2541437	2542175	277942	278650	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC1F3.02c	sap114	mkh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.007717504	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795431	2541437	2539583	277942	276142	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCC777.04	sap114	SPCC777.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.117601162	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795432	2541437	2539588	277942	276146	SPAC22A12.09c	SPCC962.04	sap114	rps1201	-	rps12|rps12-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.09286334	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795433	2541437	2541478	277942	277980	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC2F7.17	sap114	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.63232983	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795434	2541437	2543374	277942	279796	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAPB1A10.08	sap114	SPAPB1A10.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.560473011	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795435	2541437	2543333	277942	279756	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC694.02	sap114	SPAC694.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.982287779	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795436	2541437	2542656	277942	279110	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC2E1P3.05c	sap114	SPAC2E1P3.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.129349258	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795437	2541437	2541272	277942	277786	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC947.03c	sap114	naa38	-	mak31	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.028330325	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795438	2541437	2542943	277942	279384	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC1348.03	sap114	SPBC1348.03	-	SPAC1348.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.632880465	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795439	2541437	2541297	277942	277809	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC9B6.07	sap114	nop52	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.990439497	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795440	2541437	2540787	277942	277306	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC1921.07c	sap114	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.154161209	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795441	2541437	2540734	277942	277257	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC19G7.09	sap114	ulp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.865957201	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795442	2541437	2542571	277942	279027	SPAC22A12.09c	SPAC589.02c	sap114	med13	-	spTrap240|srb9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.709245718	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795443	2541437	2540736	277942	277259	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC19F8.02	sap114	SPBC19F8.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	1.955974484	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795444	2540471	2540415	276999	276943	SPBC19F8.07	SPBC30B4.06c	mcs6	SPBC30B4.06c	cdk7|crk1|mop1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.93833111	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795445	2540471	2543387	276999	279809	SPBC19F8.07	SPAPB1E7.02c	mcs6	mcl1	cdk7|crk1|mop1	slr3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ryan CJ (2012)	22681890	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.949888963	-	colony size	An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) approach was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 1.8 for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions) and S score < -2.3 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
795460	2540255	2540992	276786	277508	SPBC336.04	SPBC342.05	cdc6	crb2	mis10|pol3|pold	rhp9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Saka Y (1997)	9407031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:undetermined	deletion of crb2 abolishes the cell cycle arrest of the single mutant and the increase in SI	-	BIOGRID
795461	2543629	2540992	280043	277508	SPAC3H5.06c	SPBC342.05	pol1	crb2	polA|swi7	rhp9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Saka Y (1997)	9407031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:undetermined	deletion of crb2 abolishes the cell cycle arrest of the single mutant and the increase in SI	-	BIOGRID
795462	2540627	2540992	277153	277508	SPBC25H2.13c	SPBC342.05	cdc20	crb2	pol2	rhp9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Saka Y (1997)	9407031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:undetermined	deletion of crb2 abolishes the cell cycle arrest of the single mutant and the increase in SI	-	BIOGRID
795464	2541871	2540341	278361	276870	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC2F12.11c	res2	rep2	mcs1|pct1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nakashima N (1995)	7588609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
795465	2540341	2540433	276870	276961	SPBC2F12.11c	SPBC2D10.06	rep2	rep1	-	rec16	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nakashima N (1995)	7588609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis	double mutant cannot initiate meiosis	-	BIOGRID
795466	2540341	2540433	276870	276961	SPBC2F12.11c	SPBC2D10.06	rep2	rep1	-	rec16	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nakashima N (1995)	7588609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
795467	2540341	2541153	276870	277668	SPBC2F12.11c	SPBC725.16	rep2	res1	-	sct1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nakashima N (1995)	7588609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
795468	2541871	2540341	278361	276870	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC2F12.11c	res2	rep2	mcs1|pct1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Nakashima N (1995)	7588609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
795469	2541871	2540234	278361	276766	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC336.12c	res2	cdc10	mcs1|pct1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Nakashima N (1995)	7588609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
795470	2540341	2541871	276870	278361	SPBC2F12.11c	SPAC22F3.09c	rep2	res2	-	mcs1|pct1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nakashima N (1995)	7588609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	deletion of res2 suppresses the cold sensitivity of the rep2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
795471	2541871	2540341	278361	276870	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC2F12.11c	res2	rep2	mcs1|pct1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Nakashima N (1995)	7588609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
795581	2540470	2542558	276998	279014	SPBC29A10.15	SPAC1952.07	orc1	rad1	cdc30|orp1|rid1	rad19	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Synnes M (2002)	12186947	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:undetermined	mutation of rad genes abolishes the cell cycle arrest caused by mutation of orc1	-	BIOGRID
795582	2540470	2540719	276998	277242	SPBC29A10.15	SPBC216.05	orc1	rad3	cdc30|orp1|rid1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Synnes M (2002)	12186947	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:undetermined	mutation of rad genes abolishes the cell cycle arrest caused by mutation of orc1	-	BIOGRID
795583	2540470	2541643	276998	278139	SPBC29A10.15	SPAC14C4.13	orc1	rad17	cdc30|orp1|rid1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Synnes M (2002)	12186947	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:undetermined	mutation of rad genes abolishes the cell cycle arrest caused by mutation of orc1	-	BIOGRID
795584	2540470	2543289	276998	279714	SPBC29A10.15	SPAC9E9.08	orc1	rad26	cdc30|orp1|rid1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Synnes M (2002)	12186947	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:undetermined	mutation of rad genes abolishes the cell cycle arrest caused by mutation of orc1	-	BIOGRID
795587	2540470	2539087	276998	275659	SPBC29A10.15	SPCC1259.13	orc1	chk1	cdc30|orp1|rid1	rad27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Synnes M (2002)	12186947	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	double mutants show an enhanced cutting phenotype with earlier entry into mitosis	-	BIOGRID
795588	2540470	2540013	276998	276557	SPBC29A10.15	SPBC14C8.07c	orc1	cdc18	cdc30|orp1|rid1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Synnes M (2002)	12186947	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	double mutants show an enhanced cutting phenotype with earlier entry into mitosis	-	BIOGRID
795589	2540470	2543289	276998	279714	SPBC29A10.15	SPAC9E9.08	orc1	rad26	cdc30|orp1|rid1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Synnes M (2002)	12186947	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	double mutants show an enhanced cutting phenotype with earlier entry into mitosis	-	BIOGRID
795590	2540470	2542558	276998	279014	SPBC29A10.15	SPAC1952.07	orc1	rad1	cdc30|orp1|rid1	rad19	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Synnes M (2002)	12186947	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	double mutants show an enhanced cutting phenotype with earlier entry into mitosis	-	BIOGRID
795591	2540470	2540719	276998	277242	SPBC29A10.15	SPBC216.05	orc1	rad3	cdc30|orp1|rid1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Synnes M (2002)	12186947	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	double mutants show an enhanced cutting phenotype with earlier entry into mitosis	-	BIOGRID
795592	2540470	2541643	276998	278139	SPBC29A10.15	SPAC14C4.13	orc1	rad17	cdc30|orp1|rid1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Synnes M (2002)	12186947	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	double mutants show an enhanced cutting phenotype with earlier entry into mitosis	-	BIOGRID
795593	2539958	2540612	276502	277138	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC1D7.05	zfs1	byr2	moc4	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kanoh J (1995)	8534915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue	overexpression partially rescues the mating deficiency of a zfs1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
795594	2539958	2542137	276502	278613	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC1D4.13	zfs1	byr1	moc4	ste1|ste3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kanoh J (1995)	8534915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue	overexpression partially rescues the mating deficiency of a zfs1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
795595	2539958	2542285	276502	278753	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC17H9.09c	zfs1	ras1	moc4	ste5	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kanoh J (1995)	8534915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue	overexpression partially rescues the mating deficiency of a zfs1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
795596	2539958	2540414	276502	276942	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC24C6.06	zfs1	gpa1	moc4	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kanoh J (1995)	8534915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue	overexpression partially rescues the mating deficiency of a zfs1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
795597	2539958	2542139	276502	278615	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC18G6.07c	zfs1	mra1	moc4	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Hakuno F (1996)	9133664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:undetermined	Overexpression of mra1 could suppress the mating inefficiency caused by either overexpression of gap1 or mutation of zfs1 or ras1	-	BIOGRID
795598	2542285	2542139	278753	278615	SPAC17H9.09c	SPAC18G6.07c	ras1	mra1	ste5	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Hakuno F (1996)	9133664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:undetermined	Overexpression of mra1 could suppress the mating inefficiency caused by either overexpression of gap1 or mutation of zfs1 or ras1	-	BIOGRID
795599	2540440	2542139	276968	278615	SPBC646.12c	SPAC18G6.07c	gap1	mra1	sar1|src1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Hakuno F (1996)	9133664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:undetermined	Overexpression of mra1 could suppress the mating inefficiency caused by either overexpression of gap1 or mutation of zfs1 or ras1	-	BIOGRID
795600	2539497	2539505	276060	276068	SPCC895.07	SPCC736.14	alp14	dis1	mtc1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Nakaseko Y (2001)	11369198	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
795601	2539442	2539641	276005	276196	SPCC5E4.04	SPBC14C8.01c	cut1	cut2	ptr4	SPBC1815.02c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Uzawa S (1990)	2203537	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
795606	2543281	2539869	279708	276415	SPAC23C4.18c	SPBC11B10.09	rad4	cdc2	cut5|dpb11|dre3	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Saka Y (1994)	7957098	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:partial rescue	double mutants show a decreased in the incidence of the cut or early mitosis phenotype	-	BIOGRID
795607	2543281	2540880	279708	277397	SPAC23C4.18c	SPBC582.03	rad4	cdc13	cut5|dpb11|dre3	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Saka Y (1994)	7957098	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:partial rescue	double mutants show a decreased in the incidence of the cut or early mitosis phenotype	-	BIOGRID
795608	2539641	2539149	276196	275721	SPBC14C8.01c	SPCC1739.11c	cut2	cdc11	SPBC1815.02c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Funabiki H (1996)	8978688	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	double mutants show increased polyploidy	-	BIOGRID
795615	2543407	2539627	279829	276184	SPAC8F11.07c	SPBC1734.02c	cdc24	cdc27	-	SPBC337.18c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tanaka H (2004)	15576681	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	The cdc27-D1 and cdc27-D3 mutations suppress the temperature-sensitivity of cdc24-M38 cells	-	BIOGRID
795618	2542757	2542150	279207	278626	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC17A5.11	mre11	rec12	rad32	spo11	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Farah JA (2005)	15654094	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation efficiency:partial rescue	The very low viable spore yield in rad32-D65N crosses was suppressed in the absence of Rec12	-	BIOGRID
795706	2540989	2539675	277505	276230	SPBC3B9.07c	SPBC1718.03	rpa43	ker1	rpa21	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Imazawa Y (2005)	15647272	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
795707	2541022	2542953	277537	279393	SPBC3F6.05	SPAC1006.06	rga1	rgf2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Mutoh T (2005)	16324155	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:partial rescue|cell wall morphology:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of rgf1 or rgf2 decreases the incidence of swollen, multi-septate, branched cells seen in an rga1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
795708	2539437	2541612	276000	278109	SPCC645.06c	SPAC1F7.04	rgf3	rho1	lad1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Mutoh T (2005)	16324155	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	the over-expression of Rho1 entirely suppressed the defects of septation and contractile ring formation in the rgf3 mutant	-	BIOGRID
795709	2539580	2542953	276139	279393	SPCC645.07	SPAC1006.06	rgf1	rgf2	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Mutoh T (2005)	16324155	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
795710	2539580	2539437	276139	276000	SPCC645.07	SPCC645.06c	rgf1	rgf3	-	lad1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Mutoh T (2005)	16324155	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
795711	2539437	2542953	276000	279393	SPCC645.06c	SPAC1006.06	rgf3	rgf2	lad1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Mutoh T (2005)	16324155	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
795712	2539437	2539580	276000	276139	SPCC645.06c	SPCC645.07	rgf3	rgf1	lad1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Mutoh T (2005)	16324155	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
795713	2540992	2542226	277508	278699	SPBC342.05	SPAC19G12.06c	crb2	hta2	rhp9	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nakamura TM (2005)	16314498	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression through the G2/M phase transition|ionizing radiation resistance	genetic complex|hta1,2/crb2 triple mutants show a complete loss of checkpoint activation in response to crb2	-	BIOGRID
795714	2540992	2539499	277508	276062	SPBC342.05	SPCC622.08c	crb2	hta1	rhp9	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nakamura TM (2005)	16314498	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression through the G2/M phase transition|ionizing radiation resistance	genetic complex|hta1,2/crb2 triple mutants show a complete loss of checkpoint activation in response to crb2	-	BIOGRID
795718	2539869	2542226	276415	278699	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC19G12.06c	cdc2	hta2	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nakamura TM (2005)	16314498	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	cdc2/hta1,2 mutants show a synergistic decrease in the phosphorylation of chk1|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
795719	2539869	2539499	276415	276062	SPBC11B10.09	SPCC622.08c	cdc2	hta1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nakamura TM (2005)	16314498	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	cdc2/hta1,2 mutants show a synergistic decrease in the phosphorylation of chk1|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
795772	3361476	3361560	280552	280636	SPAC16A10.04	SPAC14C4.09	rho4	agn1	-	SPAC14C4.09	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Santos B (2005)	16215171	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|necrotic cell death	Simultaneous overexpression of rho4 and eng1 or agn1 causes dramatic cell lysis	-	BIOGRID
795773	3361476	2543379	280552	279801	SPAC16A10.04	SPAC821.09	rho4	eng1	-	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Santos B (2005)	16215171	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|necrotic cell death	Simultaneous overexpression of rho4 and eng1 or agn1 causes dramatic cell lysis	-	BIOGRID
795774	3361476	3361560	280552	280636	SPAC16A10.04	SPAC14C4.09	rho4	agn1	-	SPAC14C4.09	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Santos B (2005)	16215171	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:partial rescue	Overexpression of eng1 or agn1 suppresses the rho4 mutant multiseptation phenotype	-	BIOGRID
795775	3361476	2543379	280552	279801	SPAC16A10.04	SPAC821.09	rho4	eng1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Santos B (2005)	16215171	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:partial rescue	Overexpression of eng1 or agn1 suppresses the rho4 mutant multiseptation phenotype	-	BIOGRID
795776	2543339	3361406	279762	280482	SPAC630.13c	SPAC19E9.03	tsc2	pas1	-	SPAC57A10.01	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	van Slegtenhorst M (2005)	16115814	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient uptake	double mutants show synergistic defects in amino acid uptake	-	BIOGRID
795777	2541869	3361406	278359	280482	SPAC22F3.13	SPAC19E9.03	tsc1	pas1	-	SPAC57A10.01	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	van Slegtenhorst M (2005)	16115814	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient uptake	double mutants show synergistic defects in amino acid uptake	-	BIOGRID
795778	2541869	3361406	278359	280482	SPAC22F3.13	SPAC19E9.03	tsc1	pas1	-	SPAC57A10.01	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	van Slegtenhorst M (2005)	16115814	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in G1 phase:wild type	Delay in nitrogen starvation-induced G1 arrest in tsc1 and tsc2 mutants is rescued by deletion of Pas1	-	BIOGRID
795779	2543339	3361406	279762	280482	SPAC630.13c	SPAC19E9.03	tsc2	pas1	-	SPAC57A10.01	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	van Slegtenhorst M (2005)	16115814	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in G1 phase:wild type	Delay in nitrogen starvation-induced G1 arrest in tsc1 and tsc2 mutants is rescued by deletion of Pas1	-	BIOGRID
795780	2541293	2543539	277805	279956	SPBC9B6.10	SPAC926.04c	cdc37	hsp90	-	git10|swo1	Co-fractionation	physical	Turnbull EL (2005)	16098195	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
795781	2543685	2540584	280099	277110	SPAC3C7.03c	SPBC28F2.07	rad55	sfr1	rhp55	dds20|mug13	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Salakhova AF (2005)	16080597	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:undetermined	The overexpression of dds20 partially suppresses defects of mutant rhp55delta in DNA repair	-	BIOGRID
795787	2543580	2540584	279995	277110	SPAC644.14c	SPBC28F2.07	rad51	sfr1	rhp51	dds20|mug13	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Salakhova AF (2005)	16080597	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
795788	2540494	2539505	277022	276068	SPBC409.04c	SPCC736.14	mis12	dis1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Aoki K (2006)	16920624	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	Dis1(6A) displays synthetic lethality with the mis12-537	-	BIOGRID
795789	2539497	2539505	276060	276068	SPCC895.07	SPCC736.14	alp14	dis1	mtc1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Aoki K (2006)	16920624	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Dis1(6E)showed a synthetic growth defect with alp14	-	BIOGRID
795790	2542327	2539823	278793	276373	SPAC16C9.06c	SPBC16A3.18	upf1	cip1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Rodriguez-Gabriel MA (2006)	16914721	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	oxidative stress resistance:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
795791	2542327	2543139	278793	279571	SPAC16C9.06c	SPAC12G12.03	upf1	cip2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Rodriguez-Gabriel MA (2006)	16914721	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	oxidative stress resistance:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
795792	2541677	2540612	278173	277138	SPAC1565.04c	SPBC1D7.05	ste4	byr2	-	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tu H (1997)	9315645	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue|sporulation efficiency:partial rescue	overexpression of byr2 rescues mating and sporulation defects	-	BIOGRID
795793	2542285	2540612	278753	277138	SPAC17H9.09c	SPBC1D7.05	ras1	byr2	ste5	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tu H (1997)	9315645	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue|sporulation efficiency:partial rescue	overexpression of byr2 rescues mating and sporulation defects	-	BIOGRID
795794	2540414	2540612	276942	277138	SPBC24C6.06	SPBC1D7.05	gpa1	byr2	-	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tu H (1997)	9315645	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue|sporulation efficiency:partial rescue	overexpression of byr2 rescues mating and sporulation defects	-	BIOGRID
796196	2540380	2539205	276909	275775	SPBC1A4.05	SPCC4B3.15	blt1	mid1	-	dmf1	Co-localization	physical	Guzman-Vendrell M (2012)	23149940	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	in the absence of Blt1, Mid1-Nter localized to the nucleus but was largely absent from cortical nodes	-	BIOGRID
796197	2540380	2539205	276909	275775	SPBC1A4.05	SPCC4B3.15	blt1	mid1	-	dmf1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Guzman-Vendrell M (2012)	23149940	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation	double mutants show a synergistic increase in misplaced septa	-	BIOGRID
796198	2540380	2539205	276909	275775	SPBC1A4.05	SPCC4B3.15	blt1	mid1	-	dmf1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Guzman-Vendrell M (2012)	23149940	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	only in the presence of gef2	-	BIOGRID
796199	2543168	2539205	279599	275775	SPAC31A2.16	SPCC4B3.15	gef2	mid1	-	dmf1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Guzman-Vendrell M (2012)	23149940	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
796200	2541590	2540380	278087	276909	SPAC57A10.02	SPBC1A4.05	cdr2	blt1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Guzman-Vendrell M (2012)	23149940	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
796201	2541590	2540380	278087	276909	SPAC57A10.02	SPBC1A4.05	cdr2	blt1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Guzman-Vendrell M (2012)	23149940	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
796202	2540380	2543168	276909	279599	SPBC1A4.05	SPAC31A2.16	blt1	gef2	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Guzman-Vendrell M (2012)	23149940	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
796203	2540380	2541590	276909	278087	SPBC1A4.05	SPAC57A10.02	blt1	cdr2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Guzman-Vendrell M (2012)	23149940	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:partial rescue	genetic complex|the addition of Cdr2-CAAX partially suppressed the septum-positioning defect of blt1-5 mid1-Nter double mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
796204	2539205	2541590	275775	278087	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC57A10.02	mid1	cdr2	dmf1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Guzman-Vendrell M (2012)	23149940	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:partial rescue	genetic complex|the addition of Cdr2-CAAX partially suppressed the septum-positioning defect of blt1-5 mid1-Nter double mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
796214	2542313	2539042	278779	275615	SPAC16A10.07c	SPCC1183.05c	taz1	lig4	myb|myb1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Reis CC (2012)	23188080	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	deletion abolishes the telomere fusions caused by taz1 deletion in G1 and partially rescues lethality	-	BIOGRID
796215	2542313	2542757	278779	279207	SPAC16A10.07c	SPAC13C5.07	taz1	mre11	myb|myb1	rad32	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Reis CC (2012)	23188080	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	deletion abolishes the telomere fusions caused by taz1 deletion in G1 and partially rescues lethality	-	BIOGRID
796216	2542313	2541635	278779	278131	SPAC16A10.07c	SPAC1556.01c	taz1	rad50	myb|myb1	SPAP4C9.01c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Reis CC (2012)	23188080	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	deletion abolishes the telomere fusions caused by taz1 deletion in G1 and partially rescues lethality	-	BIOGRID
796217	2542313	3361306	278779	280382	SPAC16A10.07c	SPBC6B1.09c	taz1	nbs1	myb|myb1	slr10	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Reis CC (2012)	23188080	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	deletion abolishes the telomere fusions caused by taz1 deletion in G1 and partially rescues lethality	-	BIOGRID
796218	2540115	3361306	276652	280382	SPBC1778.02	SPBC6B1.09c	rap1	nbs1	-	slr10	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Reis CC (2012)	23188080	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue	deletion of nbs1 causes a drastic reduction in the amount of rap1-delta chromosome-end fusions	-	BIOGRID
796240	351	2540977	106848	277493	-	SPBC3E7.02c	APP	hsp16	AAA|ABETA|ABPP|AD1|APPI|CTFgamma|CVAP|PN-II|PN2	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Sakono M (2012)	23261462	9606	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
796241	2540977	351	277493	106848	SPBC3E7.02c	-	hsp16	APP	-	AAA|ABETA|ABPP|AD1|APPI|CTFgamma|CVAP|PN-II|PN2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Sakono M (2012)	23261462	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
796243	2540938	2539977	277454	276521	SPBC365.14c	SPBC4B4.08	uge1	ght2	gal10	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Matsuzawa T (2012)	23254763	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient utilization|vegetative growth	deletion of ght2 inhibits growth in a uge1 mutant on galactose	-	BIOGRID
796244	2539805	2540728	276355	277251	SPBC146.09c	SPBC216.06c	lsd1	swi1	saf110|swm1	-	Co-localization	physical	Holmes A (2012)	23260662	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	mutation of lsd1 inhibits the accumulation of swi1 at the Mps1 promoter	-	BIOGRID
796245	2539805	2541832	276355	278323	SPBC146.09c	SPAC23E2.02	lsd1	lsd2	saf110|swm1	saf140|swm2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Holmes A (2012)	23260662	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	double mutants show decreased sensitivity to TBZ (CID: 5430 CHEBI: 45979) compared to an lsd1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
796247	2542002	5802954	278486	858092	SPAC2G11.08c	SPNCRNA.98	smn1	srp7	yab8	srp	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Piazzon N (2012)	23221635	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
796389	2542824	2539242	279271	275812	SPAC144.13c	SPCC290.04	srw1	ams2	ste9	SPCC4F11.01	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Trickey M (2012)	23195958	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
796395	2542824	2539242	279271	275812	SPAC144.13c	SPCC290.04	srw1	ams2	ste9	SPCC4F11.01	Biochemical Activity	physical	Trickey M (2012)	23195958	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	in the presence of APC	-	BIOGRID
796396	2542366	2539242	278830	275812	SPAC1783.04c	SPCC290.04	hst4	ams2	-	SPCC4F11.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Trickey M (2012)	23195958	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|septum formation|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to TBZ (CID: 5430 CHEBI: 45979) ans TSA (CID: 444732 CHEBI: 39146) and an increase the cut phenotype and number of multi-septa cells	-	BIOGRID
796401	2539242	2539087	275812	275659	SPCC290.04	SPCC1259.13	ams2	chk1	SPCC4F11.01	rad27	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Trickey M (2012)	23195958	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue	deletion of chk1 partially rescues the Ams2 protein and other downstream proteins	-	BIOGRID
796402	2542366	2539242	278830	275812	SPAC1783.04c	SPCC290.04	hst4	ams2	-	SPCC4F11.01	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Trickey M (2012)	23195958	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	mutation of Ams2 partially rescues the sensitivity to CPT (CHEBI 27656 CID 24360) and HU (CHEBI 27656 CID 24360) in a hst4 mutant	-	BIOGRID
796407	2540350	2539287	276879	275855	SPBC317.01	SPCC1742.01	mbx2	gsf2	pvg4	SPCC1742.01|pfl1|SPCC1795.13|SPCPB16A4.07c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kwon EJ (2012)	23236291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation:partial rescue|flocculation:wild type	deletion inhibits the flocculation caused by overexpression of mbx2|deletion of gsf2 and pfl9 completely inhibits the flocculation caused by overexpression of mbx2|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
796408	2540350	5802937	276879	858075	SPBC317.01	SPAPB15E9.01c	mbx2	pfl2	pvg4	SPAPB15E9.01c|SPAPB18E9.06c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kwon EJ (2012)	23236291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation:partial rescue	deletion inhibits the flocculation caused by overexpression of mbx2	-	BIOGRID
796409	2540350	2541237	276879	277751	SPBC317.01	SPBC947.04	mbx2	pfl3	pvg4	SPBC947.04	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kwon EJ (2012)	23236291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation:partial rescue	deletion inhibits the flocculation caused by overexpression of mbx2	-	BIOGRID
796410	2540350	2539201	276879	275772	SPBC317.01	SPCC188.09c	mbx2	pfl4	pvg4	SPCC188.09c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kwon EJ (2012)	23236291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation:partial rescue	deletion inhibits the flocculation caused by overexpression of mbx2	-	BIOGRID
796411	2540350	2540145	276879	276682	SPBC317.01	SPBC1289.15	mbx2	pfl5	pvg4	SPBC1289.15|SPBC8E4.07c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kwon EJ (2012)	23236291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation:partial rescue	co-overxpression of rfl1 abrogates the flocculation caused by overexpression of mbx2|deletion inhibits the flocculation caused by overexpression of mbx2	-	BIOGRID
796412	2540350	2543047	276879	279482	SPBC317.01	SPAC977.07c	mbx2	pfl6	pvg4	SPAC977.07c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kwon EJ (2012)	23236291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation:partial rescue	deletion inhibits the flocculation caused by overexpression of mbx2	-	BIOGRID
796413	2540350	2540935	276879	277451	SPBC317.01	SPBC359.04c	mbx2	pfl7	pvg4	SPBC359.04c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kwon EJ (2012)	23236291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation:partial rescue	deletion inhibits the flocculation caused by overexpression of mbx2	-	BIOGRID
796414	2540350	2541854	276879	278345	SPBC317.01	SPAC1F8.06	mbx2	fta5	pvg4	sma5|pfl8	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kwon EJ (2012)	23236291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation:partial rescue	deletion inhibits the flocculation caused by overexpression of mbx2	-	BIOGRID
796415	2540350	2542453	276879	278914	SPBC317.01	SPAC186.01	mbx2	pfl9	pvg4	SPAC186.01	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kwon EJ (2012)	23236291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation:partial rescue|flocculation:wild type	deletion inhibits the flocculation caused by overexpression of mbx2|deletion of gsf2 and pfl9 completely inhibits the flocculation caused by overexpression of mbx2|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
796416	2539828	2539287	276377	275855	SPBC15D4.02	SPCC1742.01	gsf1	gsf2	SPBC15D4.02|rfl1	SPCC1742.01|pfl1|SPCC1795.13|SPCPB16A4.07c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kwon EJ (2012)	23236291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation:wild type	deletion of gsf2 completely inhibits the flocculation caused by deletion of rfl1	-	BIOGRID
796417	2539201	2542453	275772	278914	SPCC188.09c	SPAC186.01	pfl4	pfl9	SPCC188.09c	SPAC186.01	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kwon EJ (2012)	23236291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation	overexpression causes an additive effect on flocculation	-	BIOGRID
796418	2543047	2542453	279482	278914	SPAC977.07c	SPAC186.01	pfl6	pfl9	SPAC977.07c	SPAC186.01	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kwon EJ (2012)	23236291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation	overexpression causes an additive effect on flocculation	-	BIOGRID
796419	2540145	2542453	276682	278914	SPBC1289.15	SPAC186.01	pfl5	pfl9	SPBC1289.15|SPBC8E4.07c	SPAC186.01	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kwon EJ (2012)	23236291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation	overexpression causes an additive effect on flocculation	-	BIOGRID
796420	2540145	2540350	276682	276879	SPBC1289.15	SPBC317.01	pfl5	mbx2	SPBC1289.15|SPBC8E4.07c	pvg4	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kwon EJ (2012)	23236291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation:wild type	deletion of mbx2 inhibits the flocculation caused by deletion of rfl1	-	BIOGRID
796421	2539119	2539287	275691	275855	SPCC1223.13	SPCC1742.01	cbf12	gsf2	-	SPCC1742.01|pfl1|SPCC1795.13|SPCPB16A4.07c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kwon EJ (2012)	23236291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation:wild type	deletion of gsf2 completely abrogates the flocculation caused by overexpression of cbf12	-	BIOGRID
796422	2540309	2539287	276839	275855	SPBC21B10.13c	SPCC1742.01	yox1	gsf2	-	SPCC1742.01|pfl1|SPCC1795.13|SPCPB16A4.07c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kwon EJ (2012)	23236291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation:wild type	deletion of gsf2 completely abrogates the flocculation caused by deletion of yox1, sre2 or cbf11	-	BIOGRID
796423	2541044	2539287	277559	275855	SPBC354.05c	SPCC1742.01	sre2	gsf2	-	SPCC1742.01|pfl1|SPCC1795.13|SPCPB16A4.07c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kwon EJ (2012)	23236291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation:wild type	deletion of gsf2 completely abrogates the flocculation caused by deletion of yox1, sre2 or cbf11	-	BIOGRID
796424	2539560	2539287	276121	275855	SPCC736.08	SPCC1742.01	cbf11	gsf2	-	SPCC1742.01|pfl1|SPCC1795.13|SPCPB16A4.07c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kwon EJ (2012)	23236291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation:wild type	deletion of gsf2 completely abrogates the flocculation caused by deletion of yox1, sre2 or cbf11	-	BIOGRID
796426	2540193	2539287	276726	275855	SPBC1289.10c	SPCC1742.01	adn2	gsf2	-	SPCC1742.01|pfl1|SPCC1795.13|SPCPB16A4.07c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kwon EJ (2012)	23236291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation:wild type	deletion of gsf2 completely abrogates the flocculation caused by overexpression of adn2 or adn3	-	BIOGRID
796427	2538721	2539287	275305	275855	SPCC1494.10	SPCC1742.01	adn3	gsf2	SPCC70.01	SPCC1742.01|pfl1|SPCC1795.13|SPCPB16A4.07c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kwon EJ (2012)	23236291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation:wild type	deletion of gsf2 completely abrogates the flocculation caused by overexpression of adn2 or adn3	-	BIOGRID
796460	2538848	2542304	275429	278771	SPCC613.12c	SPAC1687.20c	raf1	mis6	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Gonzalez M (2012)	23267073	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
796461	2539420	2542304	275985	278771	SPCC970.07c	SPAC1687.20c	raf2	mis6	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Gonzalez M (2012)	23267073	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
796462	2539242	2538848	275812	275429	SPCC290.04	SPCC613.12c	ams2	raf1	SPCC4F11.01	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gonzalez M (2012)	23267073	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
796474	2542809	2540201	279257	276734	SPAC15A10.11	SPBC13A2.04c	ubr11	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kitamura K (2012)	22226946	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient utilization:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	forced expression of the ptr2 gene from the heterologous nmt promoter suppressed the dipeptide utilization defect in ubr11 mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
796475	2542299	2542809	278766	279257	SPAC18B11.10	SPAC15A10.11	tup11	ubr11	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kitamura K (2012)	22226946	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient utilization:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	genetic complex|slow growth of a tup11/tup12 double mutant on media containing the dipeptide Ala-Gln as the sole nitrogen source was significantly improved by increasing the expression of Ubr11 from a multicopy plasmid	-	BIOGRID
796476	2543402	2542809	279824	279257	SPAC630.14c	SPAC15A10.11	tup12	ubr11	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kitamura K (2012)	22226946	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient utilization:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	genetic complex|slow growth of a tup11/tup12 double mutant on media containing the dipeptide Ala-Gln as the sole nitrogen source was significantly improved by increasing the expression of Ubr11 from a multicopy plasmid	-	BIOGRID
796538	2539974	2541720	276518	278214	SPBC32H8.07	SPAC23H3.13c	git5	gpa2	gpb1	git8	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nocero M (1994)	8001792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	gpa2 high copy number rescues growth of a git3 or git5 double mutant on 5-FOA	-	BIOGRID
796539	2538770	2541720	275353	278214	SPCC1753.02c	SPAC23H3.13c	git3	gpa2	-	git8	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nocero M (1994)	8001792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	gpa2 high copy number rescues growth of a git3 or git5 double mutant on 5-FOA	-	BIOGRID
796540	2541720	2540617	278214	277143	SPAC23H3.13c	SPBC21C3.20c	gpa2	git1	git8	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nocero M (1994)	8001792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	double mutants show an increase in the expression of target genes as measured but a beta-galactosidase reporter	-	BIOGRID
796541	2540234	2541153	276766	277668	SPBC336.12c	SPBC725.16	cdc10	res1	-	sct1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Marks J (1992)	1522142	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytoskeleton morphology|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show hypersensitivity to caffeine (CHEBI 27732 CID 2519) and microtubule defects	-	BIOGRID
796679	2539770	2542106	276321	278582	SPBC1685.11	SPAC8E11.03c	rlp1	dmc1	-	dmp1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Grishchuk AL (2003)	14668362	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation	double mutants show reduced spore viability	-	BIOGRID
796691	2541055	2542988	277570	279426	SPBC409.07c	SPAC1006.09	wis1	win1	smf2|spc2	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Samejima I (1997)	9321395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	win1 or wis4 mutation suppresses the toxicity of overexpression of wis1	-	BIOGRID
796692	2541055	2542873	277570	279318	SPBC409.07c	SPAC9G1.02	wis1	wis4	smf2|spc2	wak1|wik1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Samejima I (1997)	9321395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	win1 or wis4 mutation suppresses the toxicity of overexpression of wis1	-	BIOGRID
796693	2542677	2541055	279130	277570	SPAC26F1.10c	SPBC409.07c	pyp1	wis1	-	smf2|spc2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Samejima I (1997)	9321395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	osmotic stress resistance|protein/peptide accumulation	double mutants show a loss of response to osmotic stress	-	BIOGRID
796694	2539781	2542660	276331	279113	SPBC106.10	SPAC328.03	pka1	tps1	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ribeiro MJ (1997)	9302019	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chemical compound accumulation|heat sensitivity	double mutants show decreased trehalose accumulation and increased thermotolerance	-	BIOGRID
796695	2541627	2542293	278123	278761	SPAC1F5.08c	SPAC17G8.14c	yam8	pck1	ehs1	SPAC22H10.01c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Carnero E (2000)	11016847	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:partial rescue|heat sensitivity:partial rescue|mating efficiency:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
796696	2541627	2539649	278123	276204	SPAC1F5.08c	SPBC12D12.04c	yam8	pck2	ehs1	pkc1|sts6	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Carnero E (2000)	11016847	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	ehs1-1 mutation only	-	BIOGRID
796697	2539649	2541627	276204	278123	SPBC12D12.04c	SPAC1F5.08c	pck2	yam8	pkc1|sts6	ehs1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Carnero E (2000)	11016847	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of ehs1 rescues lethality and cell growth defects associated with pck2 overexpression	-	BIOGRID
796699	2539974	2541720	276518	278214	SPBC32H8.07	SPAC23H3.13c	git5	gpa2	gpb1	git8	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Welton RM (2000)	11014802	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:wild type|utilization of carbon source:wild type	an activated allele of gpa2 rescues glucose repression of target genes in a git3 or git5 mutant	-	BIOGRID
796700	2538770	2541720	275353	278214	SPCC1753.02c	SPAC23H3.13c	git3	gpa2	-	git8	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Welton RM (2000)	11014802	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:wild type|utilization of carbon source:wild type	an activated allele of gpa2 rescues glucose repression of target genes in a git3 or git5 mutant	-	BIOGRID
796701	2543351	2543031	279773	279467	SPAC8C9.03	SPAC6F12.02	cgs1	rst2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kunitomo H (2000)	10982411	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue|sporulation efficiency:partial rescue	overexpression of rst2 restores mating and sporulation efficiency in a cgs1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
796702	2543351	2540258	279773	276789	SPAC8C9.03	SPBC32C12.02	cgs1	ste11	-	aff1|stex	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kunitomo H (2000)	10982411	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue|sporulation efficiency:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
796703	2543031	2540258	279467	276789	SPAC6F12.02	SPBC32C12.02	rst2	ste11	-	aff1|stex	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kunitomo H (2000)	10982411	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue|sporulation efficiency:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
796867	2540992	2540020	277508	276564	SPBC342.05	SPBC16D10.09	crb2	pcn1	rhp9	pcn	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Grenon M (1999)	9928931	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	overexpression of pcn1 in a crb2 or chk1 mutant background results in the cut phenotype, indicating lethal entry into mitosis	-	BIOGRID
796868	2539087	2540020	275659	276564	SPCC1259.13	SPBC16D10.09	chk1	pcn1	rad27	pcn	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Grenon M (1999)	9928931	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	overexpression of pcn1 in a crb2 or chk1 mutant background results in the cut phenotype, indicating lethal entry into mitosis	-	BIOGRID
796869	2538959	2540020	275533	276564	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC16D10.09	cds1	pcn1	-	pcn	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Grenon M (1999)	9928931	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	Overexpression of the mutant PCNA protein in the strain dcds1 induces the cdc phenotype	-	BIOGRID
796884	2539869	2541141	276415	277656	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC649.05	cdc2	cut12	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	stf1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Hudson JD (1990)	2245912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:partial rescue	mutation of cut12 causes cells to arrest with a shorter terminal phenotype than in  the a cdc2 single mutant	-	BIOGRID
796887	2543666	2541141	280080	277656	SPAC644.06c	SPBC649.05	cdr1	cut12	nim1	stf1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Hudson JD (1990)	2245912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:partial rescue	mutation of cut12 causes cells to arrest with a shorter terminal phenotype than in  the a cdr1 or cdr2 single mutant	-	BIOGRID
796888	2541590	2541141	278087	277656	SPAC57A10.02	SPBC649.05	cdr2	cut12	-	stf1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Hudson JD (1990)	2245912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:partial rescue	mutation of cut12 causes cells to arrest with a shorter terminal phenotype than in  the a cdr1 or cdr2 single mutant	-	BIOGRID
796890	2541141	2541193	277656	277707	SPBC649.05	SPBC776.02c	cut12	dis2	stf1	bws1|sds1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Hudson JD (1990)	2245912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|viability:undetermined	overexpressed bwsl reverses cut12 suppression of cdc25 growth defects	-	BIOGRID
796896	2542285	2540612	278753	277138	SPAC17H9.09c	SPBC1D7.05	ras1	byr2	ste5	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mach KE (1998)	9745019	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:undetermined|sporulation:undetermined	double mutants show increased conjugation and sporulation	-	BIOGRID
796897	2542285	2540730	278753	277253	SPAC17H9.09c	SPBC19C2.09	ras1	sre1	ste5	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mach KE (1998)	9745019	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:undetermined|sporulation:undetermined	double mutants show increased conjugation and sporulation	-	BIOGRID
796898	2542285	2541044	278753	277559	SPAC17H9.09c	SPBC354.05c	ras1	sre2	ste5	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mach KE (1998)	9745019	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:undetermined|sporulation:undetermined	double mutants show increased conjugation and sporulation	-	BIOGRID
796899	2542285	2540580	278753	277106	SPAC17H9.09c	SPBC19C2.05	ras1	ran1	ste5	pat1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mach KE (1998)	9745019	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:undetermined|sporulation:undetermined	double mutants show increased conjugation and sporulation	-	BIOGRID
796905	3361487	2542274	280563	278743	SPAC1805.17	SPAC1952.13	crm1	ned1	SPAC1B2.01|caf2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tange Y (2002)	12376568	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:wild type|resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	mutation of ned1 suppresses the resisitance to several drugs, including caffeine and staurosporin, and the build-up of pap1 seen in a crm1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
796906	2542274	2541059	278743	277574	SPAC1952.13	SPBC557.03c	ned1	pim1	-	dcd1|ptr2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2002)	12376568	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased temperature sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
796907	2539505	2542274	276068	278743	SPCC736.14	SPAC1952.13	dis1	ned1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2002)	12376568	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show enhanced cold sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
796908	2541193	2542274	277707	278743	SPBC776.02c	SPAC1952.13	dis2	ned1	bws1|sds1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2002)	12376568	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show enhanced cold sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
796909	2540398	2542274	276926	278743	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC1952.13	dis3	ned1	rrp44	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tange Y (2002)	12376568	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show enhanced cold sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
796910	2542358	2539123	278823	275695	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC18B5.03	clp1	wee1	flp1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Cueille N (2001)	11683392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:wild type	mutation of wee1 blocks the cell cycle arrest caused by flp1 induction	-	BIOGRID
796911	2542358	2539869	278823	276415	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC11B10.09	clp1	cdc2	flp1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Cueille N (2001)	11683392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:partial rescue	mutation of cdc2 partially relieves the cell cycle arrest caused by flp1 induction	-	BIOGRID
796912	2542358	2539869	278823	276415	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC11B10.09	clp1	cdc2	flp1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Cueille N (2001)	11683392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation	double mutants fail to septate	-	BIOGRID
796913	2542358	2539123	278823	275695	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC18B5.03	clp1	wee1	flp1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Cueille N (2001)	11683392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation	double mutants fail to septate	-	BIOGRID
796914	2541599	2540624	278096	277150	SPAC24B11.11c	SPBC24C6.07	sid2	cdc14	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fournier N (2001)	11271422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
796915	2541599	2540650	278096	277175	SPAC24B11.11c	SPBC244.01c	sid2	sid4	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fournier N (2001)	11271422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
796916	2541599	2539149	278096	275721	SPAC24B11.11c	SPCC1739.11c	sid2	cdc11	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fournier N (2001)	11271422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
796917	2541599	2540660	278096	277185	SPAC24B11.11c	SPBC21.06c	sid2	cdc7	-	its10|pld1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fournier N (2001)	11271422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
796918	2541599	2542761	278096	279211	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC1565.06c	sid2	spg1	-	sid3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fournier N (2001)	11271422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
796919	2541599	2542746	278096	279196	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC9G1.09	sid2	sid1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fournier N (2001)	11271422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
796920	2542162	2541936	278638	278423	SPAC6F6.08c	SPAC222.10c	cdc16	byr4	bub2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Fournier N (2001)	11271422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
796921	2540051	2542632	276589	279086	SPBC32H8.12c	SPAC24H6.05	act1	cdc25	cps8|pi012	sal2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ishiguro J (1993)	8292390	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	double mutants show decreased viability	-	BIOGRID
796922	2540051	2542632	276589	279086	SPBC32H8.12c	SPAC24H6.05	act1	cdc25	cps8|pi012	sal2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ishiguro J (1993)	8292390	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	overexpression of cdc25 rescues lethality at the restrictive temperature	-	BIOGRID
797023	2542304	2541321	278771	277833	SPAC1687.20c	SPBP22H7.09c	mis6	mis15	-	pi022|SPACTOKYO_453.12	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hayashi T (2004)	15369671	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
797024	2541321	2539214	277833	275784	SPBP22H7.09c	SPCC1672.10	mis15	mis16	pi022|SPACTOKYO_453.12	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hayashi T (2004)	15369671	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
797025	2542304	2539214	278771	275784	SPAC1687.20c	SPCC1672.10	mis6	mis16	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hayashi T (2004)	15369671	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
797029	2539214	2538763	275784	275346	SPCC1672.10	SPCC970.12	mis16	mis18	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hayashi T (2004)	15369671	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
797035	3361327	2541321	280403	277833	SPBC21.01	SPBP22H7.09c	mis17	mis15	SPBC776.19	pi022|SPACTOKYO_453.12	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hayashi T (2004)	15369671	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
797037	2543089	2538736	279522	275320	SPAC12G12.14c	SPCC1322.12c	pfs2	bub1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang SW (2005)	15743824	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show a lower restrictive temperature	-	BIOGRID
797041	2541720	2539207	278214	275777	SPAC23H3.13c	SPCC285.09c	gpa2	cgs2	git8	pde1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Wang L (2005)	16143612	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	double mutants show a total loss of fbp1 derepression	-	BIOGRID
797048	2541071	2541620	277586	278117	SPBC582.05c	SPAC2G11.12	brc1	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sheedy DM (2005)	15972456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to MMS (CID 4156 CHEBI 25255)	-	BIOGRID
797049	2541071	2539686	277586	276241	SPBC582.05c	SPBC1734.06	brc1	rhp18	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sheedy DM (2005)	15972456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to MMS (CID 4156 CHEBI 25255)	-	BIOGRID
797050	2541071	2542749	277586	279199	SPBC582.05c	SPAC15A10.03c	brc1	rad54	-	rhp54	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sheedy DM (2005)	15972456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
797054	2541071	2539686	277586	276241	SPBC582.05c	SPBC1734.06	brc1	rhp18	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sheedy DM (2005)	15972456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	deletion of rhp18 suppresses the rescue of smc6 by brc1	-	BIOGRID
797055	2541071	2539547	277586	276108	SPBC582.05c	SPCC553.07c	brc1	kpa1	-	mug40|pol(kappa)|pol-kappa	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sheedy DM (2005)	15972456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of kpa1/eso1/rev3 suppresses the rescue of smc6 by brc1|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
797056	2541071	2539666	277586	276221	SPBC582.05c	SPBC16A3.11	brc1	eso1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sheedy DM (2005)	15972456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of kpa1/eso1/rev3 suppresses the rescue of smc6 by brc1|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
797057	2541071	2543358	277586	279780	SPBC582.05c	SPAC688.10	brc1	rev3	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sheedy DM (2005)	15972456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of kpa1/eso1/rev3 suppresses the rescue of smc6 by brc1|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
797058	2541071	2543544	277586	279961	SPBC582.05c	SPAC664.07c	brc1	rad9	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sheedy DM (2005)	15972456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of rad9 or rad17 suppresses the rescue of smc6 by brc1	-	BIOGRID
797059	2541071	2541643	277586	278139	SPBC582.05c	SPAC14C4.13	brc1	rad17	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sheedy DM (2005)	15972456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of rad9 or rad17 suppresses the rescue of smc6 by brc1	-	BIOGRID
797060	2541071	2542007	277586	278490	SPBC582.05c	SPAC20H4.07	brc1	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sheedy DM (2005)	15972456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	deletion of rhp57 suppresses the rescue of smc6 by brc1	-	BIOGRID
797061	2541071	2541657	277586	278153	SPBC582.05c	SPAP27G11.15	brc1	slx1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sheedy DM (2005)	15972456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	deletion of slx1 suppresses the rescue of smc6 by brc1	-	BIOGRID
797079	2541071	2540574	277586	277101	SPBC582.05c	SPBC409.03	brc1	swi5	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sheedy DM (2005)	15972456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of swi5 suppresses the rescue of smc6-74 sensitivity to MMS by brc1	-	BIOGRID
797080	2541071	2539004	277586	275578	SPBC582.05c	SPCC4G3.05c	brc1	mus81	-	slx3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sheedy DM (2005)	15972456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of mus81 suppresses the rescue of smc6-74 sensitivity to MMS by brc1	-	BIOGRID
797081	2541439	2542293	277944	278761	SPAC22F8.11	SPAC17G8.14c	plc1	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Deng L (2005)	15923187	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	genetic complex|overexpression of pck1 suppresses the micafungin sensitivity of a plc1/pck2 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
797082	2540737	2542231	277260	278704	SPBC19G7.05c	SPAC19G12.14	bgs1	its3	cps1|drc1	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Deng L (2005)	15923187	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	overexpression of its3 is lethal in the presence of the bgs1-i2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
797083	2541474	2543310	277976	279734	SPAC227.16c	SPAC6B12.11	psf3	drc1	-	sld2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yabuuchi H (2006)	16990792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	double mutants show reduced sensitivity to heat	-	BIOGRID
797084	2539087	2538959	275659	275533	SPCC1259.13	SPCC18B5.11c	chk1	cds1	rad27	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Shikata M (2007)	17189249	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to UV	-	BIOGRID
797085	2538959	2543639	275533	280053	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC458.03	cds1	tel2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Shikata M (2007)	17189249	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to UV	-	BIOGRID
797086	2539087	2543639	275659	280053	SPCC1259.13	SPAC458.03	chk1	tel2	rad27	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Shikata M (2007)	17189249	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to UV	-	BIOGRID
797087	2540728	2543639	277251	280053	SPBC216.06c	SPAC458.03	swi1	tel2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Shikata M (2007)	17189249	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
797088	2540612	2542285	277138	278753	SPBC1D7.05	SPAC17H9.09c	byr2	ras1	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	ste5	Two-hybrid	physical	Chang E (1999)	10567532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
797089	2542285	2542029	278753	278511	SPAC17H9.09c	SPAC8E11.02c	ras1	rad24	ste5	anr5|sam4	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ozoe F (2002)	12242289	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:undetermined	double mutants sporulate unlike ras1 single mutants	-	BIOGRID
797090	2542285	2542252	278753	278722	SPAC17H9.09c	SPAC17A2.13c	ras1	rad25	ste5	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ozoe F (2002)	12242289	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:undetermined	double mutants sporulate unlike ras1 single mutants	-	BIOGRID
797275	2542029	2542029	278511	278511	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC8E11.02c	rad24	rad24	anr5|sam4	anr5|sam4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ozoe F (2002)	12242289	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	GFP-rad24 pulls down endogenous rad24	-	BIOGRID
797276	2542029	2540612	278511	277138	SPAC8E11.02c	SPBC1D7.05	rad24	byr2	anr5|sam4	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ozoe F (2002)	12242289	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
797277	2542252	2540612	278722	277138	SPAC17A2.13c	SPBC1D7.05	rad25	byr2	-	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ozoe F (2002)	12242289	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
797282	2542162	2541672	278638	278168	SPAC6F6.08c	SPAC2F3.15	cdc16	lsk1	bub2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Karagiannis J (2007)	17502918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	lsc1 and lask1 mutants are able to partially suppress the lethal, multi-septate phenotype of a cdc16-116 mutant	-	BIOGRID
797283	2542162	2540879	278638	277396	SPAC6F6.08c	SPBC530.13	cdc16	lsc1	bub2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Karagiannis J (2007)	17502918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	lsc1 and lask1 mutants are able to partially suppress the lethal, multi-septate phenotype of a cdc16-116 mutant	-	BIOGRID
797284	2541672	2540879	278168	277396	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC530.13	lsk1	lsc1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Karagiannis J (2007)	17502918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
797285	2541672	2540879	278168	277396	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC530.13	lsk1	lsc1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Karagiannis J (2007)	17502918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
797303	2540720	2542404	277243	278868	SPBC216.07c	SPAC57A7.11	tor2	mip1	SPBC646.01c	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Matsuo T (2007)	17261596	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
797304	2540473	2539206	277001	275776	SPBC30D10.10c	SPCC24B10.07	tor1	gad8	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Schonbrun M (2009)	19546237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	genetic complex|overexpression of gad8 partially rescues sensitivity to TBZ (CID 5430 CHEBI:45979) and HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423)|overexpression of gad8 partially rescues tor1/cdc25 synthetic lethaliy	-	BIOGRID
797305	2540473	2538959	277001	275533	SPBC30D10.10c	SPCC18B5.11c	tor1	cds1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Schonbrun M (2009)	19546237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423)	-	BIOGRID
797306	2540473	2539087	277001	275659	SPBC30D10.10c	SPCC1259.13	tor1	chk1	-	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Schonbrun M (2009)	19546237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423)	-	BIOGRID
797307	2540473	2543240	277001	279668	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC694.06c	tor1	mrc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Schonbrun M (2009)	19546237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423)	-	BIOGRID
797308	2540719	2540473	277242	277001	SPBC216.05	SPBC30D10.10c	rad3	tor1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Schonbrun M (2009)	19546237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	deletion of tor1 partially rescues lethality in response to HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423)	-	BIOGRID
797309	2538959	2540473	275533	277001	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC30D10.10c	cds1	tor1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Schonbrun M (2009)	19546237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	deletion of tor1 partially rescues lethality in response to HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423)	-	BIOGRID
797310	2542632	2539206	279086	275776	SPAC24H6.05	SPCC24B10.07	cdc25	gad8	sal2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Schonbrun M (2009)	19546237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	genetic complex|overexpression of gad8 partially rescues tor1/cdc25 synthetic lethaliy	-	BIOGRID
797311	2539123	2540473	275695	277001	SPCC18B5.03	SPBC30D10.10c	wee1	tor1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Schonbrun M (2009)	19546237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:partial rescue	Combining the tor1 mutation with the wee1-50 mutation resulted in a slight elongation of the wee (very short) phenotype	-	BIOGRID
797312	2540473	2541590	277001	278087	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC57A10.02	tor1	cdr2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Schonbrun M (2009)	19546237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size|vegetative growth	double mutants show augmented cell size	-	BIOGRID
797313	2541652	2540473	278148	277001	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC30D10.10c	sty1	tor1	phh1|spc1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Schonbrun M (2009)	19546237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:partial rescue	deletion of tor1 decreases the cell elongation phenotype seen upon deletion of sty1	-	BIOGRID
797403	5802965	2543233	858103	279661	SPAC11H11.06	SPAC630.03	arp2	arp3	SPAC22F8.01	act2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Liu SL (2012)	23148219	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
797404	5802965	2540051	858103	276589	SPAC11H11.06	SPBC32H8.12c	arp2	act1	SPAC22F8.01	cps8|pi012	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Liu SL (2012)	23148219	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
797405	2543233	2540051	279661	276589	SPAC630.03	SPBC32H8.12c	arp3	act1	act2	cps8|pi012	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Liu SL (2012)	23148219	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
797408	5802965	2543589	858103	280004	SPAC11H11.06	SPAC4F10.15c	arp2	wsp1	SPAC22F8.01	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Liu SL (2012)	23148219	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
797409	2543233	2543589	279661	280004	SPAC630.03	SPAC4F10.15c	arp3	wsp1	act2	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Liu SL (2012)	23148219	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
797435	2540977	2540977	277493	277493	SPBC3E7.02c	SPBC3E7.02c	hsp16	hsp16	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Hanazono Y (2012)	23273429	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	hsp16 dimers form a 16-meric oligomer structure determined by crystallography and SAXS	-	BIOGRID
797454	2541652	2542632	278148	279086	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC24H6.05	sty1	cdc25	phh1|spc1	sal2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Shiozaki K (1995)	7501024	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
797455	2541652	2539123	278148	275695	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC18B5.03	sty1	wee1	phh1|spc1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Shiozaki K (1995)	7501024	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	deletion of wee1 rescues the lethality of a sty1/cdc25 double mutant although the cell cycle is still blocked at the non-permissive temperature|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
797456	2542632	2539123	279086	275695	SPAC24H6.05	SPCC18B5.03	cdc25	wee1	sal2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Shiozaki K (1995)	7501024	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	deletion of wee1 rescues the lethality of a sty1/cdc25 double mutant although the cell cycle is still blocked at the non-permissive temperature|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
797457	2541055	2541652	277570	278148	SPBC409.07c	SPAC24B11.06c	wis1	sty1	smf2|spc2	phh1|spc1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Shiozaki K (1995)	7501024	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
797458	2541055	2541652	277570	278148	SPBC409.07c	SPAC24B11.06c	wis1	sty1	smf2|spc2	phh1|spc1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Shiozaki K (1995)	7501024	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	necrotic cell death:wild type|viability:wild type	deletion of sty1 rescues the cell swelling and lysis caused by overexpression of wis1	-	BIOGRID
797459	2542677	2541652	279130	278148	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC24B11.06c	pyp1	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Shiozaki K (1995)	7501024	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Dephosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
797849	2540866	2539775	277383	276326	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC14C8.17c	sep1	spt8	SPBC4C3.05	sep9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Grallert A (1999)	10392445	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nuclear fusion during mating	double mutants show increased incidence of binucleate cells	-	BIOGRID
797850	2539775	2539123	276326	275695	SPBC14C8.17c	SPCC18B5.03	spt8	wee1	sep9	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Grallert A (1999)	10392445	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nuclear fusion during mating	double mutants show increased incidence of binucleate cells	-	BIOGRID
797851	2540866	2539123	277383	275695	SPBC4C3.12	SPCC18B5.03	sep1	wee1	SPBC4C3.05	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Grallert A (1999)	10392445	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nuclear fusion during mating	double mutants show increased incidence of binucleate cells	-	BIOGRID
797853	2540761	2542162	277281	278638	SPBC21.04	SPAC6F6.08c	med8	cdc16	sep15	bub2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Grallert A (1999)	10392445	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
797869	2543222	2541592	279650	278089	SPAC821.08c	SPAC6F12.15c	slp1	cut9	cdc20	dre1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yamada HY (2000)	11058086	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
797873	2543222	2540589	279650	277115	SPAC821.08c	SPBC20F10.06	slp1	mad2	cdc20	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Yamada HY (2000)	11058086	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	unpublished result	-	BIOGRID
797876	2540887	2543086	277404	279519	SPBC4F6.15c	SPAC30D11.10	swi10	rad52	rad23	rad22|rad22A	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Osman F (2000)	11057444	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic recombination	double mutants show ahypo-recombination phenotype that is a reversal of the hyper-recombination seen in the single mutants	-	BIOGRID
797877	2543086	2538860	279519	275440	SPAC30D11.10	SPCC330.01c	rad52	rhp16	rad22|rad22A	SPCC613.13c|rad16	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Osman F (2000)	11057444	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of rad16 decreases the sensitivity to MMS (CID 4156 CHEBI 25255) seen in a rad22 mutant	-	BIOGRID
797915	2540620	2543481	277146	279901	SPBC4.04c	SPAPB2B4.03	mcm2	cig2	cdc19|nda1	cyc17	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Yamada Y (2004)	15194812	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
797916	2540784	2543481	277303	279901	SPBC211.04c	SPAPB2B4.03	mcm6	cig2	mis5	cyc17	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Yamada Y (2004)	15194812	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	unpublished data	-	BIOGRID
797917	2540470	2543481	276998	279901	SPBC29A10.15	SPAPB2B4.03	orc1	cig2	cdc30|orp1|rid1	cyc17	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Yamada Y (2004)	15194812	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	unpublished data	-	BIOGRID
797918	2540784	2539640	277303	276195	SPBC211.04c	SPBC32F12.09	mcm6	rum1	mis5	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yamada Y (2004)	15194812	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	unpublished data	-	BIOGRID
797919	2540470	2539640	276998	276195	SPBC29A10.15	SPBC32F12.09	orc1	rum1	cdc30|orp1|rid1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yamada Y (2004)	15194812	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	unpublished data	-	BIOGRID
797920	2542477	2542266	278937	278735	SPAC1B2.05	SPAC17D4.02	mcm5	cdc45	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	goa1|sna41	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yamada Y (2004)	15194812	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of cdc45 from the inducible promoter nmt41 partially suppressed the cold sensitivity of the mcm5 mutant	-	BIOGRID
797921	2542266	2542477	278735	278937	SPAC17D4.02	SPAC1B2.05	cdc45	mcm5	goa1|sna41	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yamada Y (2004)	15194812	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	the temperature sensitivity of the sna41-928/cdc45 mutation was enhanced by the mcm5 mutation	-	BIOGRID
797922	2540784	2542628	277303	279082	SPBC211.04c	SPAC24H6.06	mcm6	sld3	mis5	mug175	Co-localization	physical	Yamada Y (2004)	15194812	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	mcm6 and sld3 co-localize at origins in mcm5 arrest	-	BIOGRID
797923	2540810	2543351	277329	279773	SPBC19C7.03	SPAC8C9.03	cyr1	cgs1	git2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Stiefel J (2004)	15189983	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	mutations in cgs1 suppress the sensitivity to 5-FOA (CID 69711) and salt of a cyr1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
797924	2543240	2543289	279668	279714	SPAC694.06c	SPAC9E9.08	mrc1	rad26	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tanaka K (2004)	15173168	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	expression of a rad26-cds1 fusion protein partially suppresses the sensitivity to HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423) of an mrc1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
797925	2543240	2538959	279668	275533	SPAC694.06c	SPCC18B5.11c	mrc1	cds1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tanaka K (2004)	15173168	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	expression of a rad26-cds1 fusion protein partially suppresses the sensitivity to HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423) of an mrc1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
797926	2543240	2543289	279668	279714	SPAC694.06c	SPAC9E9.08	mrc1	rad26	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tanaka K (2004)	15173168	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:partial rescue	expression of a rad26-cds1 fusion protein partially suppresses the increase in the cut phenotype seen in an mrc1/chk1 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
797927	2543240	2538959	279668	275533	SPAC694.06c	SPCC18B5.11c	mrc1	cds1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tanaka K (2004)	15173168	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:partial rescue	expression of a rad26-cds1 fusion protein partially suppresses the increase in the cut phenotype seen in an mrc1/chk1 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
797928	2539087	2543289	275659	279714	SPCC1259.13	SPAC9E9.08	chk1	rad26	rad27	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tanaka K (2004)	15173168	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:partial rescue	expression of a rad26-cds1 fusion protein partially suppresses the increase in the cut phenotype seen in an mrc1/chk1 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
797929	2539087	2538959	275659	275533	SPCC1259.13	SPCC18B5.11c	chk1	cds1	rad27	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tanaka K (2004)	15173168	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:partial rescue	expression of a rad26-cds1 fusion protein partially suppresses the increase in the cut phenotype seen in an mrc1/chk1 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
797930	2540013	2543481	276557	279901	SPBC14C8.07c	SPAPB2B4.03	cdc18	cig2	-	cyc17	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Lopez-Girona A (1998)	9436991	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	cig2 null alleles rescue the cdc18-k9 growth defect at 35.5 degrees	-	BIOGRID
797931	2542632	2540219	279086	276752	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC31F10.13c	cdc25	hip1	sal2	hir1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Blackwell C (2004)	15121850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
797968	2542824	2543481	279271	279901	SPAC144.13c	SPAPB2B4.03	srw1	cig2	ste9	cyc17	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kitamura K (1998)	9571240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue	mutation of cig2 suppresses the mating defect of an swr1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
797982	2542824	2540234	279271	276766	SPAC144.13c	SPBC336.12c	srw1	cdc10	ste9	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kitamura K (1998)	9571240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
797999	2540234	2539640	276766	276195	SPBC336.12c	SPBC32F12.09	cdc10	rum1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kitamura K (1998)	9571240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	genetic complex|overexpression of rum1 suppresses the growth defects of an swr1/cdc10 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
798001	2539733	2542046	276285	278527	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC2F3.06c	pab2	kap104	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Mallet PL (2012)	23279110	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
798190	2539781	2542492	276331	278951	SPBC106.10	SPAC1B9.02c	pka1	sck1	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Fujita M (1998)	9560431	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|growth in exponential phase|mating response	overexpression of sck1 or sck2 suppresses the aberrant mating, long doubling time and cell shortening seen in a pka1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
798191	2542492	2541867	278951	278357	SPAC1B9.02c	SPAC22E12.14c	sck1	sck2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Fujita M (1998)	9560431	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation|growth in exponential phase	genetic complex|pka1/sck1/sck2 triple mutants show an increased doubling time and cellular aggregation	-	BIOGRID
798196	2538762	2543289	275345	279714	SPCC306.04c	SPAC9E9.08	set1	rad26	kmt2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kanoh J (2003)	12589755	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:wild type	deletion of rad26 suppresses the telomere elongation caused by deletion of set1	-	BIOGRID
798197	2538762	2540719	275345	277242	SPCC306.04c	SPBC216.05	set1	rad3	kmt2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kanoh J (2003)	12589755	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:wild type	deletion of rad3 suppresses the telomere elongation caused by deletion of set1	-	BIOGRID
798198	2538762	2539209	275345	275779	SPCC306.04c	SPCC23B6.03c	set1	tel1	kmt2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kanoh J (2003)	12589755	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	deletion of tel1 partially suppresses the telomere elongation caused by deletion of set1	-	BIOGRID
798199	2541746	2538762	278240	275345	SPAC20G4.04c	SPCC306.04c	hus1	set1	-	kmt2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kanoh J (2003)	12589755	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue|gamma ray resistance:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of set1 increases viability after DNA damage of a hus1 or rad1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
798200	2542558	2538762	279014	275345	SPAC1952.07	SPCC306.04c	rad1	set1	rad19	kmt2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kanoh J (2003)	12589755	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue|gamma ray resistance:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of set1 increases viability after DNA damage of a hus1 or rad1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
798201	2543544	2538762	279961	275345	SPAC664.07c	SPCC306.04c	rad9	set1	-	kmt2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kanoh J (2003)	12589755	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of set1 increases viability after DNA damage from MMS (CID 4156 CHEBI 25255) of arad9 or rad17 mutant	-	BIOGRID
798202	2541643	2538762	278139	275345	SPAC14C4.13	SPCC306.04c	rad17	set1	-	kmt2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kanoh J (2003)	12589755	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of set1 increases viability after DNA damage from MMS (CID 4156 CHEBI 25255) of arad9 or rad17 mutant	-	BIOGRID
798203	2540992	2540255	277508	276786	SPBC342.05	SPBC336.04	crb2	cdc6	rhp9	mis10|pol3|pold	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kanoh J (2003)	12589755	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	double mutants show reduced viability at 37 degrees	-	BIOGRID
798204	2540255	2538762	276786	275345	SPBC336.04	SPCC306.04c	cdc6	set1	mis10|pol3|pold	kmt2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kanoh J (2003)	12589755	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	deletion of set1 partially rescues the reduced viability of crb2/cdc6 double mutants at 37 degrees|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
798205	2540992	2543323	277508	279746	SPBC342.05	SPAC6B12.10c	crb2	spp1	rhp9	pri1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kanoh J (2003)	12589755	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of spp1 partially rescues the sensitivity to HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423) seen in a crb2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
798206	2540992	2540788	277508	277307	SPBC342.05	SPBC18H10.06c	crb2	swd2	rhp9	swd2.1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kanoh J (2003)	12589755	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of spp1 partially rescues the sensitivity to HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423) seen in a crb2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
798207	2540992	2541620	277508	278117	SPBC342.05	SPAC2G11.12	crb2	rqh1	rhp9	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kanoh J (2003)	12589755	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423)	-	BIOGRID
798208	2540992	2539004	277508	275578	SPBC342.05	SPCC4G3.05c	crb2	mus81	rhp9	slx3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kanoh J (2003)	12589755	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423)	-	BIOGRID
798209	2540633	2541160	277159	277675	SPBC21D10.12	SPBC725.09c	hob1	hob3	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Routhier EL (2003)	12569356	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	repression of hob3 partially suppresses the sensitivity to phleomycin (CID 72511) of a hob1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
798210	2540234	2541871	276766	278361	SPBC336.12c	SPAC22F3.09c	cdc10	res2	-	mcs1|pct1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Miyamoto M (1994)	8168485	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	double mutants show a growth defect at 25 degrees	-	BIOGRID
798211	2540234	2541871	276766	278361	SPBC336.12c	SPAC22F3.09c	cdc10	res2	-	mcs1|pct1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Miyamoto M (1994)	8168485	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	overexpression of res2 rescues the temperature sensitive growth of cdc10-129 mutant	-	BIOGRID
798212	2541871	2540234	278361	276766	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC336.12c	res2	cdc10	mcs1|pct1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Miyamoto M (1994)	8168485	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity|heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	overexpression of cdc10 enhances the ability of res2 to suppress res1 phenotypes	-	BIOGRID
798213	2541153	2541871	277668	278361	SPBC725.16	SPAC22F3.09c	res1	res2	sct1	mcs1|pct1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Miyamoto M (1994)	8168485	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
798214	2540580	2543481	277106	279901	SPBC19C2.05	SPAPB2B4.03	ran1	cig2	pat1	cyc17	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Obara-Ishihara T (1994)	7909513	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
798215	2540580	2540654	277106	277179	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC19F5.01c	ran1	puc1	pat1	SPBP8B7.32c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Obara-Ishihara T (1994)	7909513	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
798216	2539869	2540880	276415	277397	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC582.03	cdc2	cdc13	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Obara-Ishihara T (1994)	7909513	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
798217	2540580	2540234	277106	276766	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC336.12c	ran1	cdc10	pat1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Obara-Ishihara T (1994)	7909513	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating response:wild type	genetic complex|overexpression of res2 and cdc10 inhibits the conjugation phenotype of a pat1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
798289	2541153	2543481	277668	279901	SPBC725.16	SPAPB2B4.03	res1	cig2	sct1	cyc17	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Obara-Ishihara T (1994)	7909513	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating response:wild type	deletion of cig2 inhibits the suppression of conjugation caused by res1 overexpression|deletion of cig2 inhibits the suppression of conjugation caused by res1 overexpression and the rescue of ran1 mating phenotypes	-	BIOGRID
798290	2540580	2541153	277106	277668	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC725.16	ran1	res1	pat1	sct1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Obara-Ishihara T (1994)	7909513	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
798295	2540580	2541153	277106	277668	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC725.16	ran1	res1	pat1	sct1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Obara-Ishihara T (1994)	7909513	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
798296	2540580	2543481	277106	279901	SPBC19C2.05	SPAPB2B4.03	ran1	cig2	pat1	cyc17	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Obara-Ishihara T (1994)	7909513	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating response:wild type	overexpression inhibits the conjugation phenotype of a pat1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
798300	2539087	2542632	275659	279086	SPCC1259.13	SPAC24H6.05	chk1	cdc25	rad27	sal2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Mochida S (2004)	14739927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
798430	2543629	2540992	280043	277508	SPAC3H5.06c	SPBC342.05	pol1	crb2	polA|swi7	rhp9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Mochida S (2004)	14739927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	mutation of crb2 inhibits the checkpoint arrest induced by polymerase mutations causing an increase in the frequency of abnormal mitotic cells	-	BIOGRID
798431	2540255	2540992	276786	277508	SPBC336.04	SPBC342.05	cdc6	crb2	mis10|pol3|pold	rhp9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Mochida S (2004)	14739927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	mutation of crb2 inhibits the checkpoint arrest induced by polymerase mutations causing an increase in the frequency of abnormal mitotic cells	-	BIOGRID
798432	2540627	2540992	277153	277508	SPBC25H2.13c	SPBC342.05	cdc20	crb2	pol2	rhp9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Mochida S (2004)	14739927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	mutation of crb2 inhibits the checkpoint arrest induced by polymerase mutations causing an increase in the frequency of abnormal mitotic cells	-	BIOGRID
798433	2540627	2539087	277153	275659	SPBC25H2.13c	SPCC1259.13	cdc20	chk1	pol2	rad27	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mochida S (2004)	14739927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:wild type	deletion of chk1 abolishes the checkpoint arrest caused by deletion of cdc6	-	BIOGRID
798434	2543629	2539087	280043	275659	SPAC3H5.06c	SPCC1259.13	pol1	chk1	polA|swi7	rad27	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mochida S (2004)	14739927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:wild type	deletion of chk1 abolishes the checkpoint arrest caused by deletion of cdc6	-	BIOGRID
798436	2540719	2539123	277242	275695	SPBC216.05	SPCC18B5.03	rad3	wee1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yamaguchi S (1997)	9398669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
798437	2543544	2542824	279961	279271	SPAC664.07c	SPAC144.13c	rad9	srw1	-	ste9	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yamaguchi S (1997)	9398669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	genetic complex|overexpression of srw1 rescues the lethality of a rad9/wee1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
798438	2542824	2539869	279271	276415	SPAC144.13c	SPBC11B10.09	srw1	cdc2	ste9	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yamaguchi S (1997)	9398669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue	Cells lacking srw1 are sterile but sterility is suppressed by deletion of cig2 or inactivation of cdc2	-	BIOGRID
798439	2542824	2543481	279271	279901	SPAC144.13c	SPAPB2B4.03	srw1	cig2	ste9	cyc17	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yamaguchi S (1997)	9398669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue	Cells lacking srw1 are sterile but sterility is suppressed by deletion of cig2 or inactivation of cdc2	-	BIOGRID
798441	2540885	2539123	277402	275695	SPBC660.14	SPCC18B5.03	mik1	wee1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yamaguchi S (1997)	9398669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
798442	2539640	2542824	276195	279271	SPBC32F12.09	SPAC144.13c	rum1	srw1	-	ste9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yamaguchi S (1997)	9398669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating response:partial rescue	overexpression of srw1 can restore fertility to rum1 mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
798444	2539123	2540880	275695	277397	SPCC18B5.03	SPBC582.03	wee1	cdc13	-	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Yamaguchi S (1997)	9398669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	genetic complex|overexpression of cdc13 is toxic in an srw1/wee1 double mutant|overexpression of cdc13 is toxic in an swr1/wee1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
798448	2539180	2539649	275751	276204	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC12D12.04c	sts5	pck2	orb4	pkc1|sts6	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Toda T (1996)	8886983	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:wild type|resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	overexpression reverses the cell shape abnormalities and sensitivity to staurosporine seen in an sts5 mutant	-	BIOGRID
798474	2540580	2540329	277106	276859	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC29B5.01	ran1	atf1	pat1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Shiozaki K (1996)	8824587	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
798475	2540580	2541652	277106	278148	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC24B11.06c	ran1	sty1	pat1	phh1|spc1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Shiozaki K (1996)	8824587	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
798484	2540329	2541652	276859	278148	SPBC29B5.01	SPAC24B11.06c	atf1	sty1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	phh1|spc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Shiozaki K (1996)	8824587	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
798485	2541652	2540329	278148	276859	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC29B5.01	sty1	atf1	phh1|spc1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Biochemical Activity	physical	Shiozaki K (1996)	8824587	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
798486	2541055	2540329	277570	276859	SPBC409.07c	SPBC29B5.01	wis1	atf1	smf2|spc2	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Shiozaki K (1996)	8824587	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	necrotic cell death:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of atf1 prevents lysis due to overproduction of wis1	-	BIOGRID
799109	2542207	2540887	278682	277404	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC4F6.15c	ddb1	swi10	-	rad23	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Holmberg C (2005)	15805471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|mutation frequency|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	MMS (CID 4156 CHEBI 25255)	-	BIOGRID
799110	2542207	2543358	278682	279780	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC688.10	ddb1	rev3	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Holmberg C (2005)	15805471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
799588	2539513	2541699	276075	278195	SPCC645.05c	SPAP8A3.08	myo2	cdc4	rng5	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Naqvi NI (2000)	11056543	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
799896	3361532	2539847	280608	276395	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC530.14c	lkh1	dsk1	kic1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tang Z (2003)	12565823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation:wild type	overproduction of dsk1 was sufficient to abolish the cell aggregation phenotype of a kic1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
799949	2539658	2542463	276213	278924	SPBC1105.17	SPAC1834.03c	cnp1	hhf1	sim2	h4.1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Chen ES (2003)	12535531	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression partially rescues growth at 33 degrees	-	BIOGRID
799950	2539658	2541200	276213	277714	SPBC1105.17	SPBC8D2.03c	cnp1	hhf2	sim2	ams3|h4.2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Chen ES (2003)	12535531	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression partially rescues growth at 33 degrees	-	BIOGRID
799951	2539658	2539991	276213	276535	SPBC1105.17	SPBC1105.12	cnp1	hhf3	sim2	h4.3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Chen ES (2003)	12535531	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression partially rescues growth at 33 degrees	-	BIOGRID
799962	2542967	2540481	279407	277009	SPAC12B10.12c	SPBC2D10.12	rhp41	rhp23	rhp4a	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Fukumoto Y (2002)	12531030	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|viability	double mutants show increased sensitivity to UV	-	BIOGRID
799963	2542967	2539465	279407	276028	SPAC12B10.12c	SPCC4G3.10c	rhp41	rhp42	rhp4a	rhp4b	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Fukumoto Y (2002)	12531030	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|chromosome/plasmid maintenance|viability	double mutants show increased sensitivity to UV and a complete loss of NER	-	BIOGRID
799965	2540345	2540481	276874	277009	SPBC19C7.09c	SPBC2D10.12	uve1	rhp23	uvde	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Fukumoto Y (2002)	12531030	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|viability	double mutants show increased sensitivity to UV	-	BIOGRID
799981	2542824	2539869	279271	276415	SPAC144.13c	SPBC11B10.09	srw1	cdc2	ste9	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sakai T (2004)	14985109	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
799982	2540719	2542824	277242	279271	SPBC216.05	SPAC144.13c	rad3	srw1	-	ste9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sakai T (2004)	14985109	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show slightly higher sensitivity to hygromycin B	-	BIOGRID
799983	2539703	2540866	276256	277383	SPBC16G5.15c	SPBC4C3.12	fkh2	sep1	-	SPBC4C3.05	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Buck V (2004)	15509866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	strong overexpression of full-length fkh2 from the nmt1 promoter is lethal in wild-type cells but not in sep1 null cells	-	BIOGRID
800004	2542123	2539155	278599	275727	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC1020.02	mal3	spc7	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kerres A (2004)	15371542	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	spc7 rescues the increased sensitivity to TBZ (CID 5430 CHEBI:45979) seen in a mal3 mutant	-	BIOGRID
800005	2542123	2539497	278599	276060	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC895.07	mal3	alp14	-	mtc1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kerres A (2004)	15371542	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
800006	2540149	2539155	276686	275727	SPBC1289.03c	SPCC1020.02	spi1	spc7	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kerres A (2004)	15371542	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	spc7 rescues the increased sensitivity to TBZ (CID 5430 CHEBI:45979) seen in a mal3 mutant	-	BIOGRID
800029	2538786	2540024	275367	276568	SPCC830.06	SPBP4H10.04	cnb1	ppb1	SPCC830.06	SPBC1346.01c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sio SO (2005)	15657058	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	co-overexpression of cnb1 and ppb1 partially rescues sensitivity to FK506	-	BIOGRID
800031	2538786	2541806	275367	278297	SPCC830.06	SPAC4G8.13c	cnb1	prz1	SPCC830.06	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sio SO (2005)	15657058	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	deletion of prz1 rescues growth defect caused by the co-overexpression of cnb1 and ppb1-deltaC (but not wild-type ppb1)|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
800032	2540024	2541806	276568	278297	SPBP4H10.04	SPAC4G8.13c	ppb1	prz1	SPBC1346.01c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sio SO (2005)	15657058	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	deletion of prz1 rescues growth defect caused by the co-overexpression of cnb1 and ppb1-deltaC (but not wild-type ppb1)|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
800040	2543506	2541318	279924	277830	SPAC637.12c	SPBP23A10.08	mst1	alp5	kat5	arp4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Minoda A (2005)	15483052	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
800041	2541318	2543643	277830	280057	SPBP23A10.08	SPAC3G9.07c	alp5	hos2	arp4	hda1|phd1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Minoda A (2005)	15483052	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
800043	2541318	2538736	277830	275320	SPBP23A10.08	SPCC1322.12c	alp5	bub1	arp4	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Minoda A (2005)	15483052	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:wild type	double mutants lose the mitotic arrest seen in an alp5 mutant	-	BIOGRID
800044	2541318	2540589	277830	277115	SPBP23A10.08	SPBC20F10.06	alp5	mad2	arp4	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Minoda A (2005)	15483052	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:wild type	double mutants lose the mitotic arrest seen in an alp5 mutant	-	BIOGRID
800045	2541318	2540320	277830	276850	SPBP23A10.08	SPBC3D6.04c	alp5	mad1	arp4	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Minoda A (2005)	15483052	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:wild type	double mutants lose the mitotic arrest seen in an alp5 mutant	-	BIOGRID
800046	2541318	2539219	277830	275789	SPBP23A10.08	SPCC1795.01c	alp5	mad3	arp4	SPCC895.02	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Minoda A (2005)	15483052	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:wild type	double mutants lose the mitotic arrest seen in an alp5 mutant	-	BIOGRID
800047	2540283	2540473	276814	277001	SPBC1A4.02c	SPBC30D10.10c	leu1	tor1	SPBC1E8.07c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Weisman R (2005)	15466417	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	tor1-S1834E, but not tor1-S1834A, rescued leucine auxotrophs from the inhibitory effect of rapamycin (CHEBI 9168 CID 5284616)	-	BIOGRID
800048	2540473	2541195	277001	277709	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC839.17c	tor1	fkh1	-	SPBC24E9.17c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Weisman R (2005)	15466417	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	deletion of fkh1 restores the resistance to rapamycin (CHEBI 9168 CID 5284616) that is lost upon deletion of tor1	-	BIOGRID
800053	2540903	2542140	277419	278616	SPBC530.05	SPAC1783.07c	prt1	pap1	SPBC530.05	caf3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kawashima SA (2012)	22840777	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	double mutant has reduced transcript expression of bfr1+	-	BIOGRID
800054	2542140	2542190	278616	278665	SPAC1783.07c	SPAC17C9.16c	pap1	mfs1	caf3	SPAC17C9.16c|SPAC9E9.16	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kawashima SA (2012)	22840777	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	pap1 bfr1 pmd1 mfs1 caf5 quintuple mutant is sensitive to brefeldin A, cycloheximide, and Purvalanol A	-	BIOGRID
800055	2542140	2539195	278616	275766	SPAC1783.07c	SPCC18B5.01c	pap1	bfr1	caf3	SPCPJ732.04c|hba2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kawashima SA (2012)	22840777	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	pap1 bfr1 pmd1 mfs1 caf5 quintuple mutant is sensitive to brefeldin A, cycloheximide, and Purvalanol A	-	BIOGRID
800056	2542140	2538709	278616	275293	SPAC1783.07c	SPCC663.03	pap1	pmd1	caf3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kawashima SA (2012)	22840777	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	pap1 bfr1 pmd1 mfs1 caf5 quintuple mutant is sensitive to brefeldin A, cycloheximide, and Purvalanol A	-	BIOGRID
800057	2542140	2541116	278616	277631	SPAC1783.07c	SPBC609.04	pap1	caf5	caf3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kawashima SA (2012)	22840777	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	pap1 bfr1 pmd1 mfs1 caf5 quintuple mutant is sensitive to brefeldin A, cycloheximide, and Purvalanol A	-	BIOGRID
800058	2540024	2542380	276568	278844	SPBP4H10.04	SPAC17G6.04c	ppb1	cpp1	SPBC1346.01c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ma Y (2006)	17005909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionic stress resistance:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	the knockout of pmk1, pek1, mkh1, or pck2 all complemented the Cl- hypersensitive phenotype of ppb1 knock out	-	BIOGRID
800059	2542380	2542773	278844	279222	SPAC17G6.04c	SPAC16.01	cpp1	rho2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ma Y (2006)	17005909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionic stress resistance:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	only a geranylgeranylated mutant form of Rho2, which can localize to the plasma membrane even in cpp1-v1 mutant cells, reversed the resistane to chloride ions of cpp1-v1 mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
800060	2542773	2539649	279222	276204	SPAC16.01	SPBC12D12.04c	rho2	pck2	-	pkc1|sts6	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ma Y (2006)	17005909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	deletion rescues the lethality caused by overexpression of rho2	-	BIOGRID
800061	2541620	2540584	278117	277110	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC28F2.07	rqh1	sfr1	hus2|rad12|rec9	dds20|mug13	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Khasanov FK (2008)	18769921	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue|X ray resistance:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	sfr1 deletion showed partial suppression of the sensitivity of rqh1 null cells to MMS (CID 4156 CHEBI 25255), UV radiation and gamma rays	-	BIOGRID
800063	2540802	2540584	277321	277110	SPBC1921.02	SPBC28F2.07	rad60	sfr1	-	dds20|mug13	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Khasanov FK (2008)	18769921	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of sfr1 partially rescues sensitivity to MMS (CID 4156 CHEBI 25255) and plating efficiency of a rad60 mutant	-	BIOGRID
800064	2540584	2541051	277110	277566	SPBC28F2.07	SPBC3E7.08c	sfr1	rad13	dds20|mug13	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Khasanov FK (2008)	18769921	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	double mutants show increased sensitivity to UV|genetic complex|sfr1/rad13/uve1 triple mutants show increased sensitivity to UV	-	BIOGRID
800065	2540584	2540345	277110	276874	SPBC28F2.07	SPBC19C7.09c	sfr1	uve1	dds20|mug13	uvde	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Khasanov FK (2008)	18769921	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	genetic complex|sfr1/rad13/uve1 triple mutants show increased sensitivity to UV	-	BIOGRID
800066	2542667	2540589	279120	277115	SPAC26A3.16	SPBC20F10.06	dph1	mad2	ucp5	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	He X (1998)	9601094	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:partial rescue|spindle morphology:partial rescue	deletion of mad2 suppresses the cell cycle arrest with short spindle caused by dph1 overexpression	-	BIOGRID
800235	2539610	94274	276168	125153	SPBC1347.06c	-	cki1	PPP1R14A	ck1	CPI-17|CPI17|PPP1INL	Biochemical Activity	physical	Zemlickova E (2004)	15003508	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
800236	2539610	11033	276168	116222	SPBC1347.06c	-	cki1	ADAP1	ck1	CENTA1|GCS1L|p42IP4	Biochemical Activity	physical	Zemlickova E (2004)	15003508	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
801186	2542796	2540630	279244	277156	SPAC1687.04	SPBC25D12.03c	mcb1	mcm7	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
801187	2542796	2540784	279244	277303	SPAC1687.04	SPBC211.04c	mcb1	mcm6	-	mis5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
801188	2542796	2540620	279244	277146	SPAC1687.04	SPBC4.04c	mcb1	mcm2	-	cdc19|nda1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
801189	2542796	2539164	279244	275735	SPAC1687.04	SPCC16A11.17	mcb1	mcm4	-	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
801190	2542796	2538838	279244	275419	SPAC1687.04	SPCC1682.02c	mcb1	mcm3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
801191	2542796	2542477	279244	278937	SPAC1687.04	SPAC1B2.05	mcb1	mcm5	-	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
801192	2542796	2540630	279244	277156	SPAC1687.04	SPBC25D12.03c	mcb1	mcm7	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
801193	2542796	2540784	279244	277303	SPAC1687.04	SPBC211.04c	mcb1	mcm6	-	mis5	Two-hybrid	physical	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
801194	2542796	2540620	279244	277146	SPAC1687.04	SPBC4.04c	mcb1	mcm2	-	cdc19|nda1	Two-hybrid	physical	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
801195	2542796	2539164	279244	275735	SPAC1687.04	SPCC16A11.17	mcb1	mcm4	-	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Two-hybrid	physical	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
801196	2542796	2538838	279244	275419	SPAC1687.04	SPCC1682.02c	mcb1	mcm3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
801197	2542796	2542477	279244	278937	SPAC1687.04	SPAC1B2.05	mcb1	mcm5	-	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	Two-hybrid	physical	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
801198	2542796	2540630	279244	277156	SPAC1687.04	SPBC25D12.03c	mcb1	mcm7	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
801199	2542796	2540784	279244	277303	SPAC1687.04	SPBC211.04c	mcb1	mcm6	-	mis5	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
801200	2542796	2540620	279244	277146	SPAC1687.04	SPBC4.04c	mcb1	mcm2	-	cdc19|nda1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
801201	2542796	2539164	279244	275735	SPAC1687.04	SPCC16A11.17	mcb1	mcm4	-	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
801202	2542796	2538838	279244	275419	SPAC1687.04	SPCC1682.02c	mcb1	mcm3	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
801203	2542796	2542477	279244	278937	SPAC1687.04	SPAC1B2.05	mcb1	mcm5	-	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
801235	2542796	2540719	279244	277242	SPAC1687.04	SPBC216.05	mcb1	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	double mutants show growth defects at 30 degrees	-	BIOGRID
801236	2542796	2539087	279244	275659	SPAC1687.04	SPCC1259.13	mcb1	chk1	-	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	double mutants show growth defects at 30 degrees	-	BIOGRID
801255	2542796	2543629	279244	280043	SPAC1687.04	SPAC3H5.06c	mcb1	pol1	-	polA|swi7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased temperature sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
801256	2542796	2540620	279244	277146	SPAC1687.04	SPBC4.04c	mcb1	mcm2	-	cdc19|nda1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	the cdc19-P1 allele of mcm2 increases temperature sensitivity in an mcb1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
801257	2542796	2540620	279244	277146	SPAC1687.04	SPBC4.04c	mcb1	mcm2	-	cdc19|nda1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	the nda1-376 allele of mcm2 is lethal in an mcb1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
801413	2542796	2539164	279244	275735	SPAC1687.04	SPCC16A11.17	mcb1	mcm4	-	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased temperature sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
801414	2542796	2540784	279244	277303	SPAC1687.04	SPBC211.04c	mcb1	mcm6	-	mis5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased temperature sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
801415	2542796	2541165	279244	277680	SPAC1687.04	SPBC776.12c	mcb1	hsk1	-	cdc7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased temperature sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
801416	2542796	2542477	279244	278937	SPAC1687.04	SPAC1B2.05	mcb1	mcm5	-	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased temperature sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
801417	2542796	2543281	279244	279708	SPAC1687.04	SPAC23C4.18c	mcb1	rad4	-	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased temperature sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
801418	2542796	2539838	279244	276387	SPAC1687.04	SPBC1347.10	mcb1	cdc23	-	mcm10	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased temperature sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
801419	2542796	2539627	279244	276184	SPAC1687.04	SPBC1734.02c	mcb1	cdc27	-	SPBC337.18c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased temperature sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
801420	2542796	2541107	279244	277622	SPAC1687.04	SPBC646.14c	mcb1	orc5	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased temperature sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
801421	2542796	2540470	279244	276998	SPAC1687.04	SPBC29A10.15	mcb1	orc1	-	cdc30|orp1|rid1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased temperature sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
801422	2542796	2540255	279244	276786	SPAC1687.04	SPBC336.04	mcb1	cdc6	-	mis10|pol3|pold	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased temperature sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
801423	2542796	2542266	279244	278735	SPAC1687.04	SPAC17D4.02	mcb1	cdc45	-	goa1|sna41	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased temperature sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
801455	2542796	2542477	279244	278937	SPAC1687.04	SPAC1B2.05	mcb1	mcm5	-	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression partially rescues temperature sensitivity in an mcb1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
801456	2542796	2540784	279244	277303	SPAC1687.04	SPBC211.04c	mcb1	mcm6	-	mis5	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression partially rescues temperature sensitivity in an mcb1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
801457	2542796	2540630	279244	277156	SPAC1687.04	SPBC25D12.03c	mcb1	mcm7	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression partially rescues temperature sensitivity in an mcb1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
801493	2542796	2538689	279244	275274	SPAC1687.04	SPCC1795.11	mcb1	sum3	-	ded1|moc2|slh3	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	mutation in ded1 partially rescues temperature sensitivity in an mcb1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
801494	2542796	2543481	279244	279901	SPAC1687.04	SPAPB2B4.03	mcb1	cig2	-	cyc17	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of cig2 partially rescues temperature sensitivity in an mcb1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
801495	2542796	2539640	279244	276195	SPAC1687.04	SPBC32F12.09	mcb1	rum1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of rum1 partially rescues temperature sensitivity in an mcb1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
801558	2538689	2543481	275274	279901	SPCC1795.11	SPAPB2B4.03	sum3	cig2	ded1|moc2|slh3	cyc17	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	overexpression of cig2 prevents sum3 mutant rescue of mcb1 phenotypes	-	BIOGRID
801621	2538959	2542796	275533	279244	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC1687.04	cds1	mcb1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	the mcb1-L254P mutant could partially suppress the HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423) sensitivity of the cds1 null cells	-	BIOGRID
801653	2542796	3361487	279244	280563	SPAC1687.04	SPAC1805.17	mcb1	crm1	-	SPAC1B2.01|caf2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Santosa V (2013)	23322785	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution:partial rescue	mutation of crm1 inhibits the mislocalization of mcm proteins seen in an mcb1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
801717	2539828	2539287	276377	275855	SPBC15D4.02	SPCC1742.01	gsf1	gsf2	SPBC15D4.02|rfl1	SPCC1742.01|pfl1|SPCC1795.13|SPCPB16A4.07c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Matsuzawa T (2013)	23311928	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation:partial rescue	deletion nearly abolishes the flocculation caused by gsf1 deletion	-	BIOGRID
801718	2539828	2540350	276377	276879	SPBC15D4.02	SPBC317.01	gsf1	mbx2	SPBC15D4.02|rfl1	pvg4	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Matsuzawa T (2013)	23311928	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation:partial rescue	deletion nearly abolishes the flocculation caused by gsf1 deletion	-	BIOGRID
802824	2540580	2540719	277106	277242	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC216.05	ran1	rad3	pat1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Murakami H (1999)	10521402	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	deletion of rad3 allows pat1 mutants to undergo nuclear division in the presence of HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423)	-	BIOGRID
802825	2540580	2543544	277106	279961	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC664.07c	ran1	rad9	pat1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Murakami H (1999)	10521402	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	deletion of rad9 allows pat1 mutants to undergo nuclear division in the presence of HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423)	-	BIOGRID
802826	2540580	2541643	277106	278139	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC14C4.13	ran1	rad17	pat1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Murakami H (1999)	10521402	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	deletion of rad17 allows pat1 mutants to undergo nuclear division in the presence of HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423)	-	BIOGRID
802827	2540580	2541746	277106	278240	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC20G4.04c	ran1	hus1	pat1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Murakami H (1999)	10521402	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	deletion of hus1 allows pat1 mutants to undergo nuclear division in the presence of HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423)	-	BIOGRID
805761	2540580	2540885	277106	277402	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC660.14	ran1	mik1	pat1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Murakami H (1999)	10521402	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:partial rescue	genetic complex|mutation of mik1 and wee1 increases meiotic kinetics in a ran1 mutant background	-	BIOGRID
805762	2540580	2539123	277106	275695	SPBC19C2.05	SPCC18B5.03	ran1	wee1	pat1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Murakami H (1999)	10521402	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:partial rescue	genetic complex|mutation of mik1 and wee1 increases meiotic kinetics in a ran1 mutant background	-	BIOGRID
806315	2538959	2539087	275533	275659	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC1259.13	cds1	chk1	-	rad27	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Osman F (1998)	9870697	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:undetermined	chk1/cds1 double mutants show reduced sensitivity to caffeine (CHEBI 27732 CID 2519) compared to either single mutant	-	BIOGRID
806316	2539123	2542988	275695	279426	SPCC18B5.03	SPAC1006.09	wee1	win1	-	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ogden JE (1986)	3442828	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	colony size	mutation of win1 suppresses the ability of wee1 to suppress the mitotic cell cycle block caused by mutation of cdc25 ultimately resulting in elongated cells at division	-	BIOGRID
806317	2542632	2542988	279086	279426	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC1006.09	cdc25	win1	sal2	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ogden JE (1986)	3442828	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	colony size	mutation of win1 suppresses the ability of wee1 to suppress the mitotic cell cycle block caused by mutation of cdc25 ultimately resulting in elongated cells at division	-	BIOGRID
806318	2539123	2542988	275695	279426	SPCC18B5.03	SPAC1006.09	wee1	win1	-	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ogden JE (1986)	3442828	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:undetermined	mutation of win1 suppresses the ability of wee1 to suppress the mitotic cell cycle block caused by mutation of cdc25 ultimately resulting in elongated cells at division	-	BIOGRID
806471	2539712	2539442	276265	276005	SPBC146.01	SPCC5E4.04	med15	cut1	SPBP35G2.15	ptr4	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
806472	2541592	2543421	278089	279843	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC3G9.14	cut9	sak1	dre1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
806473	2540557	2539447	277084	276010	SPBC29A10.04	SPCC338.17c	psm1	rad21	smc1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
806474	2540395	2540672	276923	277197	SPBC31E1.05	SPBC23G7.05	gle1	sui1	-	psu1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
806475	2540395	2539975	276923	276519	SPBC31E1.05	SPBC12C2.06	gle1	dbp5	-	SPBC12C2.06	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
806476	2540784	2540620	277303	277146	SPBC211.04c	SPBC4.04c	mcm6	mcm2	mis5	cdc19|nda1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
806477	2540784	2542477	277303	278937	SPBC211.04c	SPAC1B2.05	mcm6	mcm5	mis5	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
806478	2540784	2538875	277303	275454	SPBC211.04c	SPCC962.02c	mcm6	bir1	mis5	SPCP31B10.10c|cut17|pbh1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
806479	2542615	2543355	279069	279777	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC959.09c	cut20	apc5	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	SPAP32A8.01c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
806480	2540013	2539804	276557	276354	SPBC14C8.07c	SPBC1105.11c	cdc18	hht3	-	h3.3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
806481	2540784	2539804	277303	276354	SPBC211.04c	SPBC1105.11c	mcm6	hht3	mis5	h3.3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
806482	2540013	2539991	276557	276535	SPBC14C8.07c	SPBC1105.12	cdc18	hhf3	-	h4.3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
806483	2540784	2539991	277303	276535	SPBC211.04c	SPBC1105.12	mcm6	hhf3	mis5	h4.3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
806484	2541592	2541117	278089	277632	SPAC6F12.15c	SPBC646.13	cut9	sds23	dre1	moc1|psp1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
806485	2541592	2540917	278089	277433	SPAC6F12.15c	SPBC409.05	cut9	skp1	dre1	psh1|sph1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
806486	2541592	2542151	278089	278627	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC17A2.09c	cut9	csx1	dre1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
806487	2541592	2542045	278089	278526	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC23C11.12	cut9	hcn1	dre1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
806488	2540307	2542151	276837	278627	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC17A2.09c	apc10	csx1	SPBC1E8.06	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
806489	2540307	2540199	276837	276732	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC1709.05	apc10	sks2	SPBC1E8.06	hsc1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
806490	2540307	2542252	276837	278722	SPBC1A4.01	SPAC17A2.13c	apc10	rad25	SPBC1E8.06	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
806491	2541592	2542029	278089	278511	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC8E11.02c	cut9	rad24	dre1	anr5|sam4	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
806492	2541592	2542252	278089	278722	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC17A2.13c	cut9	rad25	dre1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
806493	2541592	2539207	278089	275777	SPAC6F12.15c	SPCC285.09c	cut9	cgs2	dre1	pde1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
806494	2542880	2539639	279325	276194	SPAC6F12.14	SPBC106.09	cut23	cut4	apc8	apc1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
806495	2542880	2539207	279325	275777	SPAC6F12.14	SPCC285.09c	cut23	cgs2	apc8	pde1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
806496	2543421	2540199	279843	276732	SPAC3G9.14	SPBC1709.05	sak1	sks2	-	hsc1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yuasa T (2004)	15507118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
806506	2539639	2540368	276194	276897	SPBC106.09	SPBC36.05c	cut4	clr6	apc1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kimata Y (2008)	18354085	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
806507	2540307	2540368	276837	276897	SPBC1A4.01	SPBC36.05c	apc10	clr6	SPBC1E8.06	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kimata Y (2008)	18354085	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
806508	2541592	2540368	278089	276897	SPAC6F12.15c	SPBC36.05c	cut9	clr6	dre1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kimata Y (2008)	18354085	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
806512	2542657	2540821	279111	277339	SPAC31A2.05c	SPBC800.03	mis4	clr3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kimata Y (2008)	18354085	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to heat	-	BIOGRID
806513	2542657	2543643	279111	280057	SPAC31A2.05c	SPAC3G9.07c	mis4	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kimata Y (2008)	18354085	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to heat	-	BIOGRID
806514	3361204	2541592	280280	278089	SPBP23A10.04	SPAC6F12.15c	apc2	cut9	-	dre1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimata Y (2008)	18354085	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
806515	3361204	2539639	280280	276194	SPBP23A10.04	SPBC106.09	apc2	cut4	-	apc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimata Y (2008)	18354085	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
806516	3361204	2542438	280280	278900	SPBP23A10.04	SPAC17C9.01c	apc2	nuc2	-	SPAC1851.01|apc3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kimata Y (2008)	18354085	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
806517	2539639	2542880	276194	279325	SPBC106.09	SPAC6F12.14	cut4	cut23	apc1	apc8	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kimata Y (2008)	18354085	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to heat	-	BIOGRID
806518	2541592	2539781	278089	276331	SPAC6F12.15c	SPBC106.10	cut9	pka1	dre1	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kimata Y (2008)	18354085	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
806519	2541592	2540589	278089	277115	SPAC6F12.15c	SPBC20F10.06	cut9	mad2	dre1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kimata Y (2008)	18354085	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
806566	2540574	2540584	277101	277110	SPBC409.03	SPBC28F2.07	swi5	sfr1	-	dds20|mug13	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Saikusa K (2013)	23324799	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	structure visualized by electrospray ionization ion mobility mass spectrometry (ESI-IM-MS) in combination with small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS)	-	BIOGRID
810297	2542820	2539242	279267	275812	SPAC13G7.10	SPCC290.04	teb1	ams2	mug152|tay1	SPCC4F11.01	Co-localization	physical	Valente LP (2013)	23314747	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	ChIP	-	BIOGRID
810451	2542358	3361470	278823	280546	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC3G9.01	clp1	nsk1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810452	2542358	2540250	278823	276782	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC336.15	clp1	pic1	flp1	SPBC685.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810453	2542358	2538875	278823	275454	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC962.02c	clp1	bir1	flp1	SPCP31B10.10c|cut17|pbh1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810454	2542358	2539205	278823	275775	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC4B3.15	clp1	mid1	flp1	dmf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810455	2542358	2539997	278823	276541	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC1604.14c	clp1	shk1	flp1	orb2|pak1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810456	2542358	2542484	278823	278944	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC1A6.07	clp1	sle1	flp1	SPAC1A6.07|seg1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810457	2542358	2540866	278823	277383	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC4C3.12	clp1	sep1	flp1	SPBC4C3.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810458	2542358	2540643	278823	277168	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC19G7.06	clp1	mbx1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810459	2542358	2542029	278823	278511	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC8E11.02c	clp1	rad24	flp1	anr5|sam4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810460	2542358	2539700	278823	276253	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC1685.15c	clp1	klp6	flp1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810461	2542358	2541155	278823	277670	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC6B1.04	clp1	mde4	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810462	2542358	2540234	278823	276766	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC336.12c	clp1	cdc10	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810463	2542358	2541153	278823	277668	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC725.16	clp1	res1	flp1	sct1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810464	2542358	2541305	278823	277817	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC9B6.08	clp1	clc1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810465	2542358	2541975	278823	278460	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC20G8.05c	clp1	cdc15	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810466	2542358	3361562	278823	280638	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC11E3.03	clp1	csm1	flp1	pcs1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810467	2542358	2541173	278823	277687	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC725.12	clp1	nbl1	flp1	mug118	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810468	2542358	2539387	278823	275952	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC1840.03	clp1	sal3	flp1	pse1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810469	2542358	3361491	278823	280567	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC1805.08	clp1	dlc1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810470	2542358	2541871	278823	278361	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC22F3.09c	clp1	res2	flp1	mcs1|pct1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810471	2542358	2541750	278823	278244	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC2G11.11c	clp1	prh1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810472	2542358	2539358	278823	275924	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC16C4.07	clp1	scw1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810473	2542358	2541585	278823	278082	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC14C4.05c	clp1	man1	flp1	heh2|mug61	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810474	2542358	2538863	278823	275443	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC1682.03c	clp1	mug174	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810475	2542358	2539537	278823	276099	SPAC1782.09c	SPCP1E11.04c	clp1	pal1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810476	2542358	2539277	278823	275845	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC663.04	clp1	rpl39	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810477	2542358	2540148	278823	276685	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC16D10.04c	clp1	dna2	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810478	2542358	2543438	278823	279858	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC8F11.04	clp1	SPAC8F11.04	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810479	2542358	2541854	278823	278345	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC1F8.06	clp1	fta5	flp1	sma5|pfl8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810480	2542358	2542777	278823	279226	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC6F6.03c	clp1	SPAC6F6.03c	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810481	2542358	2542327	278823	278793	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC16C9.06c	clp1	upf1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810482	2542358	2539437	278823	276000	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC645.06c	clp1	rgf3	flp1	lad1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810483	2542358	2539180	278823	275751	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC16C4.09	clp1	sts5	flp1	orb4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810484	2542358	2542632	278823	279086	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC24H6.05	clp1	cdc25	flp1	sal2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810485	2542358	2542235	278823	278707	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC18G6.05c	clp1	SPAC18G6.05c	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810486	2542358	2539913	278823	276457	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC11G11.03	clp1	mrt4	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810487	2542358	2539812	278823	276362	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC1347.02	clp1	fkbp39	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810488	2542358	2539737	278823	276289	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC16A3.07c	clp1	nrm1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810489	2542358	2541044	278823	277559	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC354.05c	clp1	sre2	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810490	2542358	2539024	278823	275597	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC1902.01	clp1	gaf1	flp1	SPCC417.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810491	2542358	2538947	278823	275521	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC1682.12c	clp1	ubp16	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810492	2542358	2538897	278823	275475	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC1183.07	clp1	SPCC1183.07	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810493	2542358	2539389	278823	275954	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC1827.05c	clp1	SPCC1827.05c	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810494	2542358	2542979	278823	279417	SPAC1782.09c	SPAPJ760.02c	clp1	abp1	flp1	app1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810495	2542358	2539413	278823	275978	SPAC1782.09c	SPCP1E11.08	clp1	SPCP1E11.08	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810496	2542358	2539285	278823	275853	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC1672.02c	clp1	sap1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810497	2542358	2540246	278823	276778	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC336.07	clp1	sfc3	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810498	2542358	2542015	278823	278498	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC2G11.15c	clp1	tgs1	flp1	SPAC521.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810499	2542358	2540304	278823	276834	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC354.13	clp1	rga6	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810500	2542358	2539126	278823	275698	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC1919.09	clp1	tif6	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810501	2542358	2538736	278823	275320	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC1322.12c	clp1	bub1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810502	2542358	2538822	278823	275403	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC1840.02c	clp1	bgs4	flp1	cwg1|orb11|pbr1|sph1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810503	2542358	2541446	278823	277951	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC23G3.01	clp1	rpb2	flp1	SPAC521.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810504	2542358	2540380	278823	276909	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC1A4.05	clp1	blt1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810505	2542358	2540871	278823	277388	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC4F6.14	clp1	SPBC4F6.14	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810506	2542358	2540361	278823	276890	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC2F12.13	clp1	klp5	flp1	sot1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810507	2542358	2542965	278823	279405	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC3G6.04	clp1	rnp24	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810508	2542358	2539315	278823	275881	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC1739.01	clp1	SPCC1739.01	flp1	SPCC1906.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810509	2542358	2540284	278823	276815	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC23E6.04c	clp1	utp10	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810510	2542358	2543129	278823	279561	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC4F8.13c	clp1	rng2	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810511	2542358	2542011	278823	278494	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC23C11.05	clp1	ipp1	flp1	SPAC23C11.05|ppa|ppa1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810512	2542358	2542314	278823	278780	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC16E8.06c	clp1	nop12	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810513	2542358	2539652	278823	276207	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC1703.13c	clp1	SPBC1703.13c	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810514	2542358	2541668	278823	278164	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC1F7.02c	clp1	has1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810515	2542358	2541193	278823	277707	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC776.02c	clp1	dis2	flp1	bws1|sds1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810516	2542358	2541927	278823	278415	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC222.12c	clp1	atp2	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810517	2542358	2539778	278823	276328	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC15D4.01c	clp1	klp9	flp1	SPBC2D10.21c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810518	2542358	2540300	278823	276831	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC2G2.08	clp1	ade9	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810519	2542358	2541268	278823	277782	SPAC1782.09c	SPBP19A11.03c	clp1	mts4	flp1	rpn1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810520	2542358	2540796	278823	277315	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC1A4.07c	clp1	sof1	flp1	SPBC1A4.07c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810521	2542358	2543386	278823	279808	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC644.17c	clp1	mrpl9	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810522	2542358	2540087	278823	276625	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC32H8.05	clp1	SPBC32H8.05	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810523	2542358	2540792	278823	277311	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC4F6.06	clp1	kin1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810524	2542358	2541679	278823	278175	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC2C4.11c	clp1	rbp28	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810525	2542358	2542976	278823	279414	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC9E9.09c	clp1	atd1	flp1	SPAC9E9.09c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810526	2542358	2541500	278823	278002	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC227.18	clp1	lys3	flp1	SPAC2F7.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810527	2542358	2539187	278823	275758	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC16C4.14c	clp1	sfc4	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810528	2542358	2542001	278823	278485	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC20G8.06	clp1	not1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810529	2542358	2541070	278823	277585	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC646.07c	clp1	SPBC646.07c	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810530	2542358	2540899	278823	277415	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC4F6.18c	clp1	arf1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810531	2542358	2541323	278823	277835	SPAC1782.09c	SPBP35G2.14	clp1	SPBP35G2.14	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810532	2542358	2539992	278823	276536	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC1289.04c	clp1	pob1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810533	2542358	2540078	278823	276616	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC16H5.08c	clp1	SPBC16H5.08c	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810534	2542358	2542151	278823	278627	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC17A2.09c	clp1	csx1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810535	2542358	2540309	278823	276839	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC21B10.13c	clp1	yox1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810536	2542358	2538877	278823	275456	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC1322.04	clp1	fyu1	flp1	SPCC1322.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810537	2542358	2541699	278823	278195	SPAC1782.09c	SPAP8A3.08	clp1	cdc4	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810538	2542358	2543576	278823	279991	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC4A8.05c	clp1	myp2	flp1	myo3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810539	2542358	2542204	278823	278679	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC17A5.14	clp1	exo2	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810540	2542358	2542329	278823	278795	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC9G1.10c	clp1	SPAC9G1.10c	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810541	2542358	2539659	278823	276214	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC146.13c	clp1	myo1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810542	2542358	2541176	278823	277690	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC776.08c	clp1	utp22	flp1	SPBC776.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810543	2542358	2540315	278823	276845	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC2F12.14c	clp1	gua1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810544	2542358	2542740	278823	279190	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC9G1.06c	clp1	cyk3	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810545	2542358	2540437	278823	276965	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC25B2.07c	clp1	mmb1	flp1	mug164	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810546	2542358	2539390	278823	275955	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC162.07	clp1	ent1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810547	2542358	2539592	278823	276150	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC794.12c	clp1	mae2	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810548	2542358	2542940	278823	279381	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC31A2.12	clp1	SPAC31A2.12	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810549	2542358	2539311	278823	275878	SPAC1782.09c	SPCP1E11.06	clp1	apl4	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810550	2542358	2543181	278823	279611	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC3F10.03	clp1	grs1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810551	2542358	2540677	278823	277202	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC21B10.03c	clp1	ath1	flp1	SPBC21B10.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810552	2542358	2538747	278823	275330	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC132.01c	clp1	mtr1	flp1	SPCC132.01c|SPCC1322.17c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810553	2542358	2541730	278823	278224	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC22H10.11c	clp1	SPAC22H10.11c	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810554	2542358	2539149	278823	275721	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC1739.11c	clp1	cdc11	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810555	2542358	5802726	278823	857864	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC1223.15c	clp1	spc19	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810556	2542358	2539216	278823	275786	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC14G10.04	clp1	SPCC14G10.04	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810557	2542358	2538713	278823	275297	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC1682.09c	clp1	gcg1	flp1	SPCC1682.09c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810558	2542358	2542253	278823	278723	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC17H9.04c	clp1	SPAC17H9.04c	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810559	2542358	2539497	278823	276060	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC895.07	clp1	alp14	flp1	mtc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810560	2542358	2539452	278823	276015	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC70.03c	clp1	SPCC70.03c	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810561	2542358	2541163	278823	277678	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC83.15	clp1	SPBC83.15	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810562	2542358	2541218	278823	277732	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC8D2.18c	clp1	SPBC8D2.18c	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810563	2542358	2541525	278823	278025	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC27D7.02c	clp1	SPAC27D7.02c	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810564	2542358	2539552	278823	276113	SPAC1782.09c	SPCPJ732.01	clp1	vps5	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810565	2542358	2542856	278823	279302	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC6F12.11c	clp1	sfc1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810566	2542358	2539843	278823	276391	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC16G5.11c	clp1	bag101	flp1	bag1|bag1-a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810567	2542358	2541434	278823	277939	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC27E2.03c	clp1	SPAC27E2.03c	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810568	2542358	2541412	278823	277920	SPAC1782.09c	SPBPJ4664.04	clp1	SPBPJ4664.04	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810569	2542358	2540249	278823	276781	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC32F12.08c	clp1	duo1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810570	2542358	2539541	278823	276103	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC4G3.13c	clp1	SPCC4G3.13c	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810571	2542358	2541253	278823	277767	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC8D2.07c	clp1	sfc9	flp1	SPBC8D2.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810572	2542358	2540487	278823	277015	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC23G7.12c	clp1	rpt6	flp1	let1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810573	2542358	2541856	278823	278347	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC23H3.08c	clp1	bub3	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810574	2542358	2542085	278823	278562	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC26F1.06	clp1	gpm1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810575	2542358	2542381	278823	278845	SPAC1782.09c	SPACUNK4.07c	clp1	cta4	flp1	SPAPYUK71.01|sev4|SPAC2E11.07c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810576	2542358	3361462	278823	280538	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC3A11.12c	clp1	rpt5	flp1	pam2|tbp1|SPAC3H5.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810577	2542358	2542252	278823	278722	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC17A2.13c	clp1	rad25	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810578	2542358	2539700	278823	276253	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC1685.15c	clp1	klp6	flp1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810579	2542358	2539285	278823	275853	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC1672.02c	clp1	sap1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810580	2542358	2539997	278823	276541	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC1604.14c	clp1	shk1	flp1	orb2|pak1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810581	2539700	2542358	276253	278823	SPBC1685.15c	SPAC1782.09c	klp6	clp1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	flp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810582	2539285	2542358	275853	278823	SPCC1672.02c	SPAC1782.09c	sap1	clp1	-	flp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810583	2539997	2542358	276541	278823	SPBC1604.14c	SPAC1782.09c	shk1	clp1	orb2|pak1	flp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810584	2540866	2542358	277383	278823	SPBC4C3.12	SPAC1782.09c	sep1	clp1	SPBC4C3.05	flp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810585	2542358	2540234	278823	276766	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC336.12c	clp1	cdc10	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810586	2542358	2541153	278823	277668	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC725.16	clp1	res1	flp1	sct1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810587	2542358	2539737	278823	276289	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC16A3.07c	clp1	nrm1	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810588	2542358	2539149	278823	275721	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC1739.11c	clp1	cdc11	flp1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810589	2540234	2542358	276766	278823	SPBC336.12c	SPAC1782.09c	cdc10	clp1	-	flp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810590	2541153	2542358	277668	278823	SPBC725.16	SPAC1782.09c	res1	clp1	sct1	flp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810591	2539737	2542358	276289	278823	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC1782.09c	nrm1	clp1	-	flp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810592	2539149	2542358	275721	278823	SPCC1739.11c	SPAC1782.09c	cdc11	clp1	-	flp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810593	2542358	2539700	278823	276253	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC1685.15c	clp1	klp6	flp1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Dephosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810594	2542358	2539285	278823	275853	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC1672.02c	clp1	sap1	flp1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Dephosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810595	2542358	2539997	278823	276541	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC1604.14c	clp1	shk1	flp1	orb2|pak1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Dephosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810596	2542358	2540866	278823	277383	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC4C3.12	clp1	sep1	flp1	SPBC4C3.05	Biochemical Activity	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Dephosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810597	2542358	2540234	278823	276766	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC336.12c	clp1	cdc10	flp1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Dephosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810598	2542358	2541153	278823	277668	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC725.16	clp1	res1	flp1	sct1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Dephosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810599	2542358	2539737	278823	276289	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC16A3.07c	clp1	nrm1	flp1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Dephosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810600	2542358	2539149	278823	275721	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC1739.11c	clp1	cdc11	flp1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Dephosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810607	2542358	2541013	278823	277528	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC3H7.13	clp1	far10	flp1	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis	double mutants show increased defects in cytokinesis	-	BIOGRID
810616	2539149	2542746	275721	279196	SPCC1739.11c	SPAC9G1.09	cdc11	sid1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	the phosphomimetic cdc11-S8D-GFP mutation exacerbates defects in SIN signaling, reducing the restrictive temperature of sid1-239 and spg1-106	-	BIOGRID
810617	2539149	2542761	275721	279211	SPCC1739.11c	SPAC1565.06c	cdc11	spg1	-	sid3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	the phosphomimetic cdc11-S8D-GFP mutation exacerbates defects in SIN signaling, reducing the restrictive temperature of sid1-239 and spg1-106	-	BIOGRID
810619	2539149	2540660	275721	277185	SPCC1739.11c	SPBC21.06c	cdc11	cdc7	-	its10|pld1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	the phosphomimetic cdc11-S8D-GFP mutation is synthetic lethal with cdc7-24	-	BIOGRID
810621	2539149	2540660	275721	277185	SPCC1739.11c	SPBC21.06c	cdc11	cdc7	-	its10|pld1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	the phosphomimetic cdc11-S8D-GFP mutation is synthetic lethal with cdc7-24	-	BIOGRID
810622	2539387	2542358	275952	278823	SPCC1840.03	SPAC1782.09c	sal3	clp1	pse1	flp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
810623	2542358	2543526	278823	279944	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC4A8.15c	clp1	cdc3	flp1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
810624	2539869	2542358	276415	278823	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC1782.09c	cdc2	clp1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	flp1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Chen JS (2013)	23297348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of clp1 partially rescues the temperature sensitivity of a cdc2-33 mutant	-	BIOGRID
810628	2540678	2541195	277203	277709	SPBC1A4.10c	SPBC839.17c	pmc1	fkh1	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	SPBC24E9.17c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ishiguro J (2012)	23271606	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of fkh1 restores resistance to rapamycin (CHEBI 9168 CID 5284616) lost in a pmc1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
810863	2540678	2542677	277203	279130	SPBC1A4.10c	SPAC26F1.10c	pmc1	pyp1	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ishiguro J (2012)	23271606	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	overexpression restores resistance to rapamycin (CHEBI 9168 CID 5284616) lost in a pmc1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
810864	2540678	2541209	277203	277723	SPBC1A4.10c	SPBC887.10	pmc1	mcs4	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ishiguro J (2012)	23271606	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	overexpression restores resistance to rapamycin (CHEBI 9168 CID 5284616) lost in a pmc1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
810865	2540678	2542200	277203	278675	SPBC1A4.10c	SPAC19D5.01	pmc1	pyp2	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ishiguro J (2012)	23271606	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	overexpression restores resistance to rapamycin (CHEBI 9168 CID 5284616) lost in a pmc1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
810866	2540678	2540019	277203	276563	SPBC1A4.10c	SPBC1685.01	pmc1	pmp1	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	dsp1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ishiguro J (2012)	23271606	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	overexpression restores resistance to rapamycin (CHEBI 9168 CID 5284616) lost in a pmc1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
810867	2540678	2540024	277203	276568	SPBC1A4.10c	SPBP4H10.04	pmc1	ppb1	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	SPBC1346.01c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ishiguro J (2012)	23271606	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	overexpression restores resistance to rapamycin (CHEBI 9168 CID 5284616) lost in a pmc1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
810868	2540678	2539206	277203	275776	SPBC1A4.10c	SPCC24B10.07	pmc1	gad8	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ishiguro J (2012)	23271606	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	overexpression restores resistance to rapamycin (CHEBI 9168 CID 5284616) lost in a pmc1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
810873	2543529	2542677	279947	279130	SPAC4C5.02c	SPAC26F1.10c	ryh1	pyp1	hos1|sat7	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ishiguro J (2012)	23271606	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	overexpression restores resistance to rapamycin (CHEBI 9168 CID 5284616) lost in a single mutant	-	BIOGRID
810874	2540737	2542677	277260	279130	SPBC19G7.05c	SPAC26F1.10c	bgs1	pyp1	cps1|drc1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ishiguro J (2012)	23271606	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	overexpression restores resistance to rapamycin (CHEBI 9168 CID 5284616) lost in a single mutant	-	BIOGRID
810875	2543529	2542200	279947	278675	SPAC4C5.02c	SPAC19D5.01	ryh1	pyp2	hos1|sat7	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ishiguro J (2012)	23271606	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	overexpression restores resistance to rapamycin (CHEBI 9168 CID 5284616) lost in a single mutant	-	BIOGRID
810876	2540737	2542200	277260	278675	SPBC19G7.05c	SPAC19D5.01	bgs1	pyp2	cps1|drc1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ishiguro J (2012)	23271606	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	overexpression restores resistance to rapamycin (CHEBI 9168 CID 5284616) lost in a single mutant	-	BIOGRID
810877	2543529	2539206	279947	275776	SPAC4C5.02c	SPCC24B10.07	ryh1	gad8	hos1|sat7	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ishiguro J (2012)	23271606	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	overexpression restores resistance to rapamycin (CHEBI 9168 CID 5284616) lost in a single mutant	-	BIOGRID
810878	2543529	2540737	279947	277260	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC19G7.05c	ryh1	bgs1	hos1|sat7	cps1|drc1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ishiguro J (2012)	23271606	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to rapamycin (CHEBI 9168 CID 5284616)	-	BIOGRID
810879	2540678	2543529	277203	279947	SPBC1A4.10c	SPAC4C5.02c	pmc1	ryh1	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	hos1|sat7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ishiguro J (2012)	23271606	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to rapamycin (CHEBI 9168 CID 5284616)	-	BIOGRID
810880	2540678	2540737	277203	277260	SPBC1A4.10c	SPBC19G7.05c	pmc1	bgs1	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	cps1|drc1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ishiguro J (2012)	23271606	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to rapamycin (CHEBI 9168 CID 5284616)	-	BIOGRID
811926	2541652	2540072	278148	276610	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC16H5.07c	sty1	ppa2	phh1|spc1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show decreased cell length at the time of division	-	BIOGRID
811927	2541652	2540318	278148	276848	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC30B4.04c	sty1	sol1	phh1|spc1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show decreased cell length at the time of division	-	BIOGRID
811928	2541652	2541801	278148	278292	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC2F7.08c	sty1	snf5	phh1|spc1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show decreased cell length at the time of division	-	BIOGRID
811929	2541652	2539958	278148	276502	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC1718.07c	sty1	zfs1	phh1|spc1	moc4	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show decreased cell length at the time of division	-	BIOGRID
811930	2541652	2542358	278148	278823	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC1782.09c	sty1	clp1	phh1|spc1	flp1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show decreased cell length at the time of division	-	BIOGRID
811931	2541652	2540468	278148	276996	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC23G7.04c	sty1	nif1	phh1|spc1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show decreased cell length at the time of division	-	BIOGRID
811932	2541652	2539136	278148	275708	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC1919.05	sty1	SPCC1919.05	phh1|spc1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show decreased cell length at the time of division	-	BIOGRID
811933	2541652	2541889	278148	278379	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC2F7.03c	sty1	pom1	phh1|spc1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show decreased cell length at the time of division	-	BIOGRID
811934	2541652	2538769	278148	275352	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC126.04c	sty1	sgf73	phh1|spc1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis|vegetative growth	double mutants show decreased growth rates and cytokinesis defects	-	BIOGRID
811935	2543666	2540072	280080	276610	SPAC644.06c	SPBC16H5.07c	cdr1	ppa2	nim1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show decreased cell length at the time of division compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
811936	2543666	2540318	280080	276848	SPAC644.06c	SPBC30B4.04c	cdr1	sol1	nim1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show decreased cell length at the time of division compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
811937	2543666	2541801	280080	278292	SPAC644.06c	SPAC2F7.08c	cdr1	snf5	nim1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show decreased cell length at the time of division compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
811938	2543666	2539958	280080	276502	SPAC644.06c	SPBC1718.07c	cdr1	zfs1	nim1	moc4	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show decreased cell length at the time of division compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
811939	2543666	2542358	280080	278823	SPAC644.06c	SPAC1782.09c	cdr1	clp1	nim1	flp1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show decreased cell length at the time of division compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
811940	2543666	2540468	280080	276996	SPAC644.06c	SPBC23G7.04c	cdr1	nif1	nim1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show decreased cell length at the time of division compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
811941	2543666	2539136	280080	275708	SPAC644.06c	SPCC1919.05	cdr1	SPCC1919.05	nim1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show decreased cell length at the time of division compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
811942	2543666	2540736	280080	277259	SPAC644.06c	SPBC19F8.02	cdr1	SPBC19F8.02	nim1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show decreased cell length at the time of division compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
811943	2543666	2539733	280080	276285	SPAC644.06c	SPBC16E9.12c	cdr1	pab2	nim1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show decreased cell length at the time of division compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
811944	2543666	2539974	280080	276518	SPAC644.06c	SPBC32H8.07	cdr1	git5	nim1	gpb1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show decreased cell length at the time of division compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
811945	2543666	2538770	280080	275353	SPAC644.06c	SPCC1753.02c	cdr1	git3	nim1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show decreased cell length at the time of division compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
811946	2543666	2539781	280080	276331	SPAC644.06c	SPBC106.10	cdr1	pka1	nim1	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show decreased cell length at the time of division compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
811947	2543666	2541434	280080	277939	SPAC644.06c	SPAC27E2.03c	cdr1	SPAC27E2.03c	nim1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show decreased cell length at the time of division compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
811948	2543666	2541720	280080	278214	SPAC644.06c	SPAC23H3.13c	cdr1	gpa2	nim1	git8	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show decreased cell length at the time of division compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
811949	2543666	2542677	280080	279130	SPAC644.06c	SPAC26F1.10c	cdr1	pyp1	nim1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show decreased cell length at the time of division compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
811950	2543666	2538769	280080	275352	SPAC644.06c	SPCC126.04c	cdr1	sgf73	nim1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis|vegetative growth	double mutants show decreased growth rates and cytokinesis defects	-	BIOGRID
813896	2540072	2539958	276610	276502	SPBC16H5.07c	SPBC1718.07c	ppa2	zfs1	-	moc4	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show decreased cell length at division compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
813897	2540318	2542358	276848	278823	SPBC30B4.04c	SPAC1782.09c	sol1	clp1	-	flp1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show decreased cell length at division compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
813898	2540318	2540072	276848	276610	SPBC30B4.04c	SPBC16H5.07c	sol1	ppa2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show decreased cell length at division compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
813899	2540318	2539958	276848	276502	SPBC30B4.04c	SPBC1718.07c	sol1	zfs1	-	moc4	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show decreased cell length at division compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
813900	2542358	2541801	278823	278292	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC2F7.08c	clp1	snf5	flp1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show decreased cell length at division compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
813901	2541801	2539958	278292	276502	SPAC2F7.08c	SPBC1718.07c	snf5	zfs1	-	moc4	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show decreased cell length at division compared to single mutants	-	BIOGRID
813902	2540072	2541801	276610	278292	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC2F7.08c	ppa2	snf5	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show decreased cell length at the time of division	-	BIOGRID
813903	2540072	2542358	276610	278823	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC1782.09c	ppa2	clp1	-	flp1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show decreased cell length at the time of division	-	BIOGRID
813904	2539958	2542358	276502	278823	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC1782.09c	zfs1	clp1	moc4	flp1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show decreased cell length at the time of division	-	BIOGRID
815345	2538775	2542749	275357	279199	SPCC23B6.05c	SPAC15A10.03c	ssb3	rad54	rpa3	rhp54	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tay Z (2013)	23365689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
815346	2542749	2539507	279199	276070	SPAC15A10.03c	SPCC417.02	rad54	dad5	rhp54	hos3|hsk3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tay Z (2013)	23365689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
815347	2543685	2539507	280099	276070	SPAC3C7.03c	SPCC417.02	rad55	dad5	rhp55	hos3|hsk3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tay Z (2013)	23365689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
815348	2542749	2542418	279199	278881	SPAC15A10.03c	SPAC1805.07c	rad54	dad2	rhp54	hos2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tay Z (2013)	23365689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
815349	2543685	3361558	280099	280634	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC14C4.16	rad55	dad3	rhp55	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tay Z (2013)	23365689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
815350	2542854	3361558	279300	280634	SPAC144.02	SPAC14C4.16	iec1	dad3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tay Z (2013)	23365689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	hypersensitivity to antibiotic doxorubicin	-	BIOGRID
815351	2543685	3361558	280099	280634	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC14C4.16	rad55	dad3	rhp55	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tay Z (2013)	23365689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	hypersensitivity to antibiotic doxorubicin	-	BIOGRID
815352	2542749	2542418	279199	278881	SPAC15A10.03c	SPAC1805.07c	rad54	dad2	rhp54	hos2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tay Z (2013)	23365689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	hypersensitivity to antibiotic doxorubicin	-	BIOGRID
815353	2543685	2539507	280099	276070	SPAC3C7.03c	SPCC417.02	rad55	dad5	rhp55	hos3|hsk3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tay Z (2013)	23365689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	hypersensitivity to antibiotic doxorubicin	-	BIOGRID
815354	2542749	2539507	279199	276070	SPAC15A10.03c	SPCC417.02	rad54	dad5	rhp54	hos3|hsk3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tay Z (2013)	23365689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	hypersensitivity to antibiotic doxorubicin	-	BIOGRID
815355	2539705	2543685	276258	280099	SPBC1105.10	SPAC3C7.03c	rav1	rad55	-	rhp55	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tay Z (2013)	23365689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	hypersensitivity to antibiotic doxorubicin	-	BIOGRID
815356	2538709	2543685	275293	280099	SPCC663.03	SPAC3C7.03c	pmd1	rad55	-	rhp55	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tay Z (2013)	23365689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	hypersensitivity to antibiotic doxorubicin	-	BIOGRID
815357	2539705	2542854	276258	279300	SPBC1105.10	SPAC144.02	rav1	iec1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tay Z (2013)	23365689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	hypersensitivity to antibiotic doxorubicin	-	BIOGRID
815358	2539705	2539507	276258	276070	SPBC1105.10	SPCC417.02	rav1	dad5	-	hos3|hsk3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tay Z (2013)	23365689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	hypersensitivity to antibiotic doxorubicin	-	BIOGRID
815359	2538709	3361558	275293	280634	SPCC663.03	SPAC14C4.16	pmd1	dad3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tay Z (2013)	23365689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	hypersensitivity to antibiotic doxorubicin	-	BIOGRID
815360	2543685	2543235	280099	279663	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC56F8.04c	rad55	ppt1	rhp55	coq2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tay Z (2013)	23365689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	hypersensitivity to antibiotic doxorubicin	-	BIOGRID
815361	2543235	3361558	279663	280634	SPAC56F8.04c	SPAC14C4.16	ppt1	dad3	coq2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tay Z (2013)	23365689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	hypersensitivity to antibiotic doxorubicin	-	BIOGRID
815362	2539705	2543685	276258	280099	SPBC1105.10	SPAC3C7.03c	rav1	rad55	-	rhp55	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tay Z (2013)	23365689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
815363	2543235	3361558	279663	280634	SPAC56F8.04c	SPAC14C4.16	ppt1	dad3	coq2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tay Z (2013)	23365689	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
815364	2539869	2541141	276415	277656	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC649.05	cdc2	cut12	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	stf1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Grallert A (2013)	23333317	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
815365	2541193	2541141	277707	277656	SPBC776.02c	SPBC649.05	dis2	cut12	bws1|sds1	stf1	Two-hybrid	physical	Grallert A (2013)	23333317	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
815366	2541141	2541193	277656	277707	SPBC649.05	SPBC776.02c	cut12	dis2	stf1	bws1|sds1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Grallert A (2013)	23333317	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
815367	2542632	2541193	279086	277707	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC776.02c	cdc25	dis2	sal2	bws1|sds1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Grallert A (2013)	23333317	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
815368	2542632	2539123	279086	275695	SPAC24H6.05	SPCC18B5.03	cdc25	wee1	sal2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Grallert A (2013)	23333317	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
815369	2541141	2541957	277656	278444	SPBC649.05	SPAC23C11.16	cut12	plo1	stf1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Grallert A (2013)	23333317	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
815370	2541193	2541141	277707	277656	SPBC776.02c	SPBC649.05	dis2	cut12	bws1|sds1	stf1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Grallert A (2013)	23333317	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
815371	2542237	2541141	278709	277656	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC649.05	fin1	cut12	-	stf1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Grallert A (2013)	23333317	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
815372	2539869	2541141	276415	277656	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC649.05	cdc2	cut12	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	stf1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Grallert A (2013)	23333317	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
815795	2541071	2541633	277586	278129	SPBC582.05c	SPAC664.01c	brc1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lee SY (2013)	23358415	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	increased sensitivity to thiabendazole (TBZ)	-	BIOGRID
815946	2543030	2542632	279466	279086	SPAC12B10.10	SPAC24H6.05	nod1	cdc25	SPAC12B10.10	sal2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Jourdain I (2013)	23349808	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	nod1 cdc25-22 double mutant has increased cell length at division	-	BIOGRID
815947	2543030	2543168	279466	279599	SPAC12B10.10	SPAC31A2.16	nod1	gef2	SPAC12B10.10	-	Co-localization	physical	Jourdain I (2013)	23349808	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
815948	2543030	2540380	279466	276909	SPAC12B10.10	SPBC1A4.05	nod1	blt1	SPAC12B10.10	-	Co-localization	physical	Jourdain I (2013)	23349808	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
815949	2543168	2540380	279599	276909	SPAC31A2.16	SPBC1A4.05	gef2	blt1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Jourdain I (2013)	23349808	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
815950	2543168	2540380	279599	276909	SPAC31A2.16	SPBC1A4.05	gef2	blt1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jourdain I (2013)	23349808	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
815951	2543168	2543030	279599	279466	SPAC31A2.16	SPAC12B10.10	gef2	nod1	-	SPAC12B10.10	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jourdain I (2013)	23349808	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
815954	2543030	2540380	279466	276909	SPAC12B10.10	SPBC1A4.05	nod1	blt1	SPAC12B10.10	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jourdain I (2013)	23349808	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
815955	2543030	2543168	279466	279599	SPAC12B10.10	SPAC31A2.16	nod1	gef2	SPAC12B10.10	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jourdain I (2013)	23349808	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
815956	2540380	2543030	276909	279466	SPBC1A4.05	SPAC12B10.10	blt1	nod1	-	SPAC12B10.10	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jourdain I (2013)	23349808	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
815957	2540380	2543168	276909	279599	SPBC1A4.05	SPAC31A2.16	blt1	gef2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jourdain I (2013)	23349808	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
815958	2541957	2543030	278444	279466	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC12B10.10	plo1	nod1	-	SPAC12B10.10	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Jourdain I (2013)	23349808	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation	plo1.ts19 nod1 double mutant has increased percentage of abnormal septa	-	BIOGRID
815959	2541957	2543168	278444	279599	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC31A2.16	plo1	gef2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Jourdain I (2013)	23349808	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation	plo1.ts19 gef2 double mutant has increased percentage of abnormal septa	-	BIOGRID
816284	2542503	2541033	278961	277548	SPAC19A8.12	SPBC3B9.21	dcp2	dcp1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Wang CY (2013)	23319050	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	stress increases the co-localization in cytoplasmic P-bodies	-	BIOGRID
816285	2542503	2540639	278961	277164	SPAC19A8.12	SPBC18E5.11c	dcp2	edc3	-	SPBC23G7.01c	Co-localization	physical	Wang CY (2013)	23319050	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	stress increases the co-localization in cytoplasmic P-bodies	-	BIOGRID
816286	2542503	2541216	278961	277730	SPAC19A8.12	SPBC776.09	dcp2	ste13	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Wang CY (2013)	23319050	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	stress increases the co-localization in cytoplasmic P-bodies	-	BIOGRID
816287	2542503	2542204	278961	278679	SPAC19A8.12	SPAC17A5.14	dcp2	exo2	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Wang CY (2013)	23319050	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	stress increases the co-localization in cytoplasmic P-bodies	-	BIOGRID
816288	2542503	2541033	278961	277548	SPAC19A8.12	SPBC3B9.21	dcp2	dcp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang CY (2013)	23319050	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
816289	2542503	2543539	278961	279956	SPAC19A8.12	SPAC926.04c	dcp2	hsp90	-	git10|swo1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang CY (2013)	23319050	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
816290	2542503	2542204	278961	278679	SPAC19A8.12	SPAC17A5.14	dcp2	exo2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang CY (2013)	23319050	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
816291	2542503	5802967	278961	858105	SPAC19A8.12	SPAC20G4.08	dcp2	pdc1	-	SPAC20G4.08|SPAC4F10.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang CY (2013)	23319050	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
816292	2542503	5802967	278961	858105	SPAC19A8.12	SPAC20G4.08	dcp2	pdc1	-	SPAC20G4.08|SPAC4F10.01	Co-localization	physical	Wang CY (2013)	23319050	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	co-localization in P-bodies is increased by stress	-	BIOGRID
816293	5802967	2542503	858105	278961	SPAC20G4.08	SPAC19A8.12	pdc1	dcp2	SPAC20G4.08|SPAC4F10.01	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang CY (2013)	23319050	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
816298	5802967	2542503	858105	278961	SPAC20G4.08	SPAC19A8.12	pdc1	dcp2	SPAC20G4.08|SPAC4F10.01	-	Co-localization	physical	Wang CY (2013)	23319050	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	protein co-localize in P-bodies	-	BIOGRID
816299	5802967	2541033	858105	277548	SPAC20G4.08	SPBC3B9.21	pdc1	dcp1	SPAC20G4.08|SPAC4F10.01	-	Co-localization	physical	Wang CY (2013)	23319050	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	protein co-localize in P-bodies	-	BIOGRID
816300	5802967	2540639	858105	277164	SPAC20G4.08	SPBC18E5.11c	pdc1	edc3	SPAC20G4.08|SPAC4F10.01	SPBC23G7.01c	Co-localization	physical	Wang CY (2013)	23319050	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	protein co-localize in P-bodies	-	BIOGRID
816301	5802967	2541216	858105	277730	SPAC20G4.08	SPBC776.09	pdc1	ste13	SPAC20G4.08|SPAC4F10.01	-	Co-localization	physical	Wang CY (2013)	23319050	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	protein co-localize in P-bodies	-	BIOGRID
816302	5802967	2542204	858105	278679	SPAC20G4.08	SPAC17A5.14	pdc1	exo2	SPAC20G4.08|SPAC4F10.01	-	Co-localization	physical	Wang CY (2013)	23319050	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	protein co-localize in P-bodies	-	BIOGRID
816303	5802967	5802967	858105	858105	SPAC20G4.08	SPAC20G4.08	pdc1	pdc1	SPAC20G4.08|SPAC4F10.01	SPAC20G4.08|SPAC4F10.01	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang CY (2013)	23319050	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
816304	5802967	2540639	858105	277164	SPAC20G4.08	SPBC18E5.11c	pdc1	edc3	SPAC20G4.08|SPAC4F10.01	SPBC23G7.01c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang CY (2013)	23319050	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
816305	5802967	2541216	858105	277730	SPAC20G4.08	SPBC776.09	pdc1	ste13	SPAC20G4.08|SPAC4F10.01	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang CY (2013)	23319050	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
816306	2540792	2540024	277311	276568	SPBC4F6.06	SPBP4H10.04	kin1	ppb1	-	SPBC1346.01c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Cadou A (2013)	23294323	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
816307	2540792	2540024	277311	276568	SPBC4F6.06	SPBP4H10.04	kin1	ppb1	-	SPBC1346.01c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cadou A (2013)	23294323	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of a constitutively active ppb1 allele partially rescues kin1 sensitivity to FK506 (CID 445643 CHEBI 61049) and high chloride ions	-	BIOGRID
816308	2540792	2542175	277311	278650	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC1F3.02c	kin1	mkh1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Cadou A (2013)	23294323	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion partially rescues kin1 sensitivity to FK506 (CID 445643 CHEBI 61049)	-	BIOGRID
816309	2540792	2540919	277311	277435	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC543.07	kin1	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Cadou A (2013)	23294323	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion partially rescues kin1 sensitivity to FK506 (CID 445643 CHEBI 61049)	-	BIOGRID
816310	2540792	2539920	277311	276464	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC119.08	kin1	pmk1	-	spm1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Cadou A (2013)	23294323	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion partially rescues kin1 sensitivity to FK506 (CID 445643 CHEBI 61049)	-	BIOGRID
816311	2540792	2539649	277311	276204	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC12D12.04c	kin1	pck2	-	pkc1|sts6	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Cadou A (2013)	23294323	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion partially rescues kin1 sensitivity to FK506 (CID 445643 CHEBI 61049)	-	BIOGRID
816317	2540792	2540024	277311	276568	SPBC4F6.06	SPBP4H10.04	kin1	ppb1	-	SPBC1346.01c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Cadou A (2013)	23294323	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation	chemical inhibition of kin1/ppb1 mutants causes septation defects	-	BIOGRID
816318	2540601	2538760	277127	275343	SPBC29A3.14c	SPCC970.01	trt1	rad16	-	rad10|rad20|swi9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Almeida H (2013)	23335786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	fusion of degraded telomeres to create mini-circle chromosomes in trt1 mutant cells requires rad16	-	BIOGRID
816319	2540601	2542757	277127	279207	SPBC29A3.14c	SPAC13C5.07	trt1	mre11	-	rad32	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Almeida H (2013)	23335786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	fusion of degraded telomeres to create mini-circle chromosomes in trt1 mutant cells requires rad32	-	BIOGRID
816320	2540601	2541635	277127	278131	SPBC29A3.14c	SPAC1556.01c	trt1	rad50	-	SPAP4C9.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Almeida H (2013)	23335786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	fusion of degraded telomeres to create mini-circle chromosomes in trt1 mutant cells requires rad50	-	BIOGRID
816321	2540601	3361306	277127	280382	SPBC29A3.14c	SPBC6B1.09c	trt1	nbs1	-	slr10	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Almeida H (2013)	23335786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	fusion of degraded telomeres to create mini-circle chromosomes in trt1 mutant cells requires nbs1	-	BIOGRID
816322	2540601	2538706	277127	275290	SPBC29A3.14c	SPCC338.08	trt1	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Almeida H (2013)	23335786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	fusion of degraded telomeres to create mini-circle chromosomes in trt1 mutant cells requires ctp1	-	BIOGRID
816323	2540792	2539920	277311	276464	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC119.08	kin1	pmk1	-	spm1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Cadou A (2013)	23294323	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:partial rescue	In the presence of FK506 and 1NM-PP1, kin1-as1/pmk1 double mutants showed strong suppression of the aberrant septa seen in kin1-as1 cells	-	BIOGRID
816324	2540792	2539649	277311	276204	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC12D12.04c	kin1	pck2	-	pkc1|sts6	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Cadou A (2013)	23294323	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:partial rescue	In the presence of FK506 and 1NM-PP1, kin1-as1/pck2 double mutants showed suppression of the aberrant septa seen in kin1-as1 cells	-	BIOGRID
816325	2540792	2540019	277311	276563	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1685.01	kin1	pmp1	-	dsp1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Cadou A (2013)	23294323	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|septum formation	double mutants show increased septation defects|double mutants show increased septation defects in the presence of FK506 and 1NM-PP1	-	BIOGRID
816326	2540792	2538846	277311	275427	SPBC4F6.06	SPCC1919.10c	kin1	myo52	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Cadou A (2013)	23294323	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:partial rescue	In the presence of FK506 and 1NM-PP1, kin1-as1/myo4 double mutants showed suppression of the aberrant septa seen in kin1-as1 cells	-	BIOGRID
816327	2540792	2542293	277311	278761	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC17G8.14c	kin1	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Cadou A (2013)	23294323	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:partial rescue	In the presence of FK506 and 1NM-PP1, kin1-as1/pck1 double mutants showed suppression of the aberrant septa seen in kin1-as1 cells	-	BIOGRID
816328	2542313	2539090	278779	275662	SPAC16A10.07c	SPCC126.02c	taz1	pku70	myb|myb1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Almeida H (2013)	23335786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	end fusion of mini-circle chromosomes in taz1 over-expressing cells requires pku70	-	BIOGRID
816329	2542313	2539042	278779	275615	SPAC16A10.07c	SPCC1183.05c	taz1	lig4	myb|myb1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Almeida H (2013)	23335786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	end fusion of mini-circle chromosomes in taz1 over-expressing cells requires lig4	-	BIOGRID
816330	2542313	2542757	278779	279207	SPAC16A10.07c	SPAC13C5.07	taz1	mre11	myb|myb1	rad32	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Almeida H (2013)	23335786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	end fusion of mini-circle chromosomes in taz1 over-expressing cells requires rad32	-	BIOGRID
816331	2542313	2541635	278779	278131	SPAC16A10.07c	SPAC1556.01c	taz1	rad50	myb|myb1	SPAP4C9.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Almeida H (2013)	23335786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	end fusion of mini-circle chromosomes in taz1 over-expressing cells requires rad50	-	BIOGRID
816332	2542313	3361306	278779	280382	SPAC16A10.07c	SPBC6B1.09c	taz1	nbs1	myb|myb1	slr10	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Almeida H (2013)	23335786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	end fusion of mini-circle chromosomes in taz1 over-expressing cells requires nbs1	-	BIOGRID
816333	2542313	2538706	278779	275290	SPAC16A10.07c	SPCC338.08	taz1	ctp1	myb|myb1	mug38|nip1|slr9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Almeida H (2013)	23335786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	end fusion of mini-circle chromosomes in taz1 over-expressing cells requires ctp1	-	BIOGRID
816368	2542703	2543580	279156	279995	SPAC26H5.06	SPAC644.14c	pot1	rad51	-	rhp51	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nanbu T (2013)	23297345	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viable	pot1 rqh1 rad51 triple mutant	-	BIOGRID
816369	2541620	2543580	278117	279995	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC644.14c	rqh1	rad51	hus2|rad12|rec9	rhp51	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nanbu T (2013)	23297345	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viable	pot1 rqh1 rad51 triple mutant	-	BIOGRID
816370	2542703	2541620	279156	278117	SPAC26H5.06	SPAC2G11.12	pot1	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Nanbu T (2013)	23297345	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
816393	2539804	2541633	276354	278129	SPBC1105.11c	SPAC664.01c	hht3	swi6	h3.3	SPAC824.10c	Protein-peptide	physical	Li X (2012)	23281010	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Swi6 interacts in vitro with with an H3K9Me3 peptide|products phto-crosslinked	-	BIOGRID
816394	2542703	2540348	279156	276877	SPAC26H5.06	SPBC29A10.05	pot1	exo1	-	mut2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nanbu T (2013)	23297345	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viable:partial rescue	pot1 rqh1 exo1 triple mutant	-	BIOGRID
816395	2541620	2540348	278117	276877	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC29A10.05	rqh1	exo1	hus2|rad12|rec9	mut2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nanbu T (2013)	23297345	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viable:partial rescue	pot1 rqh1 exo1 triple mutant	-	BIOGRID
816416	2541620	2543580	278117	279995	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC644.14c	rqh1	rad51	hus2|rad12|rec9	rhp51	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nanbu T (2013)	23297345	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:partial rescue	pot1 rqh1 rad51 triple mutant; rqh1 expression controlled from the nmt81 thiamine-repressible promoter; cells grown in the presence of thiamine	-	BIOGRID
816417	2542703	2541620	279156	278117	SPAC26H5.06	SPAC2G11.12	pot1	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nanbu T (2013)	23297345	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation	rqh1 expression controlled from the nmt81 thiamine-repressible promoter; cells grown in the presence of thiamine	-	BIOGRID
816418	2542703	2543580	279156	279995	SPAC26H5.06	SPAC644.14c	pot1	rad51	-	rhp51	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nanbu T (2013)	23297345	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation	pot1 rqh1 rad51 triple mutant; rqh1 expression controlled from the nmt81 thiamine-repressible promoter; cells grown in the presence of thiamine	-	BIOGRID
816419	2542703	2542007	279156	278490	SPAC26H5.06	SPAC20H4.07	pot1	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nanbu T (2013)	23297345	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viable	pot1 rqh1 rad57 triple mutant	-	BIOGRID
816420	2541620	2542007	278117	278490	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC20H4.07	rqh1	rad57	hus2|rad12|rec9	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nanbu T (2013)	23297345	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viable	pot1 rqh1 rad57 triple mutant	-	BIOGRID
816717	2540792	2540019	277311	276563	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1685.01	kin1	pmp1	-	dsp1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Cadou A (2013)	23294323	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Pmp1/kin1 double mutant cells show an extreme additive sensitivity to FK506,(CID 445643 CHEBI 61049)	-	BIOGRID
816718	2540792	2542293	277311	278761	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC17G8.14c	kin1	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Cadou A (2013)	23294323	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
816719	2540792	2541652	277311	278148	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC24B11.06c	kin1	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Cadou A (2013)	23294323	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Spc1/kin1 double mutant cells show an extreme additive sensitivity to FK506(CID 445643 CHEBI 61049)	-	BIOGRID
816720	2543576	2540792	279991	277311	SPAC4A8.05c	SPBC4F6.06	myp2	kin1	myo3	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Cadou A (2013)	23294323	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation	Kin1 inhibition exacerbated cytokinesis failure in myo3 null cells	-	BIOGRID
816721	2541699	2540792	278195	277311	SPAP8A3.08	SPBC4F6.06	cdc4	kin1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Cadou A (2013)	23294323	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:partial rescue	Kin1 inhibition rescued the cdc4-8 mutant	-	BIOGRID
817116	2542727	2542558	279177	279014	SPAC26A3.02	SPAC1952.07	myh1	rad1	myh	rad19	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chang DY (2005)	15533944	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
817934	2540992	2539087	277508	275659	SPBC342.05	SPCC1259.13	crb2	chk1	rhp9	rad27	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Du LL (2004)	15229228	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	radiation resistance:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Dimerization of checkpoint kinase Chk1 partially rescues the UV sensitivity caused by the removal of Crb2 BRCT domains	-	BIOGRID
817941	2539997	2541726	276541	278220	SPBC1604.14c	SPAC22H10.07	shk1	scd2	orb2|pak1	ral3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Chang E (1999)	10567532	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	Overexpression of scd2 partially rescues the slow growth due to overexpression of shk1R1 subdomain	-	BIOGRID
820546	2543629	2543164	280043	279595	SPAC3H5.06c	SPAC3G6.06c	pol1	rad2	polA|swi7	fen1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency:partial rescue	the mutation rates of pol-alpha-ts11 and pol-alpha-ts13 decreased in a rad2 null background	-	BIOGRID
820547	2542083	2543164	278560	279595	SPAC27E2.05	SPAC3G6.06c	cdc1	rad2	mis1	fen1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency:partial rescue	all the ts deletion mutators in a rad2 null background had reduced percentages of deletion mutations	-	BIOGRID
820548	2539627	2543164	276184	279595	SPBC1734.02c	SPAC3G6.06c	cdc27	rad2	SPBC337.18c	fen1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency:partial rescue	all the ts deletion mutators in a rad2 null background had reduced percentages of deletion mutations	-	BIOGRID
820549	2541849	2543164	278340	279595	SPAC20G8.01	SPAC3G6.06c	cdc17	rad2	SPAC57A10.13c	fen1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency:partial rescue	all the ts deletion mutators in a rad2 null background had reduced percentages of deletion mutations	-	BIOGRID
820550	2540255	2543164	276786	279595	SPBC336.04	SPAC3G6.06c	cdc6	rad2	mis10|pol3|pold	fen1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency:partial rescue	all the ts deletion mutators in a rad2 null background had reduced percentages of deletion mutations	-	BIOGRID
820551	2543164	2542083	279595	278560	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC27E2.05	rad2	cdc1	fen1	mis1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency:partial rescue	the duplication mutation rate of rad2 null was reduced in a ts replication mutator background	-	BIOGRID
820552	2543164	2539627	279595	276184	SPAC3G6.06c	SPBC1734.02c	rad2	cdc27	fen1	SPBC337.18c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency:partial rescue	the duplication mutation rate of rad2 null was reduced in a ts replication mutator background	-	BIOGRID
820553	2543164	2540255	279595	276786	SPAC3G6.06c	SPBC336.04	rad2	cdc6	fen1	mis10|pol3|pold	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency:partial rescue	the duplication mutation rate of rad2 null was reduced in a ts replication mutator background	-	BIOGRID
820554	2543164	2543629	279595	280043	SPAC3G6.06c	SPAC3H5.06c	rad2	pol1	fen1	polA|swi7	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency:partial rescue	the duplication mutation rate of rad2 null was reduced in a ts replication mutator background	-	BIOGRID
820555	2538959	2543629	275533	280043	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC3H5.06c	cds1	pol1	-	polA|swi7	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
820556	2543289	2539627	279714	276184	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC1734.02c	rad26	cdc27	-	SPBC337.18c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
820557	2543289	2541849	279714	278340	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC20G8.01	rad26	cdc17	-	SPAC57A10.13c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
820558	2543289	2543164	279714	279595	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC3G6.06c	rad26	rad2	-	fen1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
820559	2538959	2543629	275533	280043	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC3H5.06c	cds1	pol1	-	polA|swi7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
820560	2538959	2542083	275533	278560	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC27E2.05	cds1	cdc1	-	mis1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
820561	2538959	2540255	275533	276786	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC336.04	cds1	cdc6	-	mis10|pol3|pold	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
820562	2538959	2539627	275533	276184	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC1734.02c	cds1	cdc27	-	SPBC337.18c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
820563	2538959	2541849	275533	278340	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC20G8.01	cds1	cdc17	-	SPAC57A10.13c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
820567	2542083	2538959	278560	275533	SPAC27E2.05	SPCC18B5.11c	cdc1	cds1	mis1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency	-	-	BIOGRID
820568	2540255	2538959	276786	275533	SPBC336.04	SPCC18B5.11c	cdc6	cds1	mis10|pol3|pold	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency	-	-	BIOGRID
820569	2539627	2538959	276184	275533	SPBC1734.02c	SPCC18B5.11c	cdc27	cds1	SPBC337.18c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency	-	-	BIOGRID
820570	2541849	2538959	278340	275533	SPAC20G8.01	SPCC18B5.11c	cdc17	cds1	SPAC57A10.13c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency	-	-	BIOGRID
820571	2539627	2543289	276184	279714	SPBC1734.02c	SPAC9E9.08	cdc27	rad26	SPBC337.18c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency	-	-	BIOGRID
820572	2541849	2543289	278340	279714	SPAC20G8.01	SPAC9E9.08	cdc17	rad26	SPAC57A10.13c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency	-	-	BIOGRID
820626	2540627	2541620	277153	278117	SPBC25H2.13c	SPAC2G11.12	cdc20	rqh1	pol2	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	data not shown	-	BIOGRID
820627	2540255	2541620	276786	278117	SPBC336.04	SPAC2G11.12	cdc6	rqh1	mis10|pol3|pold	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	data not shown	-	BIOGRID
820628	2539838	2541620	276387	278117	SPBC1347.10	SPAC2G11.12	cdc23	rqh1	mcm10	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	data not shown	-	BIOGRID
820629	2543629	2541620	280043	278117	SPAC3H5.06c	SPAC2G11.12	pol1	rqh1	polA|swi7	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	data not shown	-	BIOGRID
820630	2541849	2541620	278340	278117	SPAC20G8.01	SPAC2G11.12	cdc17	rqh1	SPAC57A10.13c	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	data not shown	-	BIOGRID
820631	2539627	2541620	276184	278117	SPBC1734.02c	SPAC2G11.12	cdc27	rqh1	SPBC337.18c	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	data not shown	-	BIOGRID
820632	2542083	2541620	278560	278117	SPAC27E2.05	SPAC2G11.12	cdc1	rqh1	mis1	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Liu VF (1999)	9891047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	data not shown	-	BIOGRID
823163	2539733	2543492	276285	279912	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC890.07c	pab2	rmt1	-	prmt1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mallet PL (2012)	23279110	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution:partial rescue	deletion of rmt1 prevents the cytosolic build-up of pab2 caused by expression of a pab2-P165A mutant	-	BIOGRID
823164	2539733	2542046	276285	278527	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC2F3.06c	pab2	kap104	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Mallet PL (2012)	23279110	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	double mutants show an accumulation of the rpl30-2 transcript that can not be rescued by expression of Pab2	-	BIOGRID
823165	2542732	2542655	279182	279109	SPAC25G10.07c	SPAC3A11.14c	cut7	pkl1	-	SPAC3H5.03c|klp1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Olmsted ZT (2013)	23388459	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
823166	2542655	2540392	279109	276920	SPAC3A11.14c	SPBC365.15	pkl1	alp4	SPAC3H5.03c|klp1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Olmsted ZT (2013)	23388459	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823167	2542655	2540690	279109	277215	SPAC3A11.14c	SPBC428.20c	pkl1	alp6	SPAC3H5.03c|klp1	SPBC902.01c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Olmsted ZT (2013)	23388459	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823168	2542655	2540223	279109	276756	SPAC3A11.14c	SPBC32F12.04	pkl1	gtb1	SPAC3H5.03c|klp1	tug1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Olmsted ZT (2013)	23388459	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823310	3361400	3361491	280476	280567	SPAC1093.06c	SPAC1805.08	dhc1	dlc1	SPAC30C2.01c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yoshida M (2013)	23401002	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance|meiosis	many nuclei in dhc1/dlc1 double mutant zygotes contained multiple telomere signals and a single SPB signal demonstrating defects in meiotic telomere clustering	-	BIOGRID
823311	2539914	2542313	276458	278779	SPBC12D12.01	SPAC16A10.07c	sad1	taz1	SPBC16H5.01c	myb|myb1	Co-localization	physical	Yoshida M (2013)	23401002	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823312	2539914	2543069	276458	279502	SPBC12D12.01	SPAC3A11.05c	sad1	kms1	SPBC16H5.01c	-	Co-localization	physical	Yoshida M (2013)	23401002	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823313	2539914	2541247	276458	277761	SPBC12D12.01	SPBC947.12	sad1	kms2	SPBC16H5.01c	-	Co-localization	physical	Yoshida M (2013)	23401002	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823314	2539914	3361400	276458	280476	SPBC12D12.01	SPAC1093.06c	sad1	dhc1	SPBC16H5.01c	SPAC30C2.01c	Co-localization	physical	Yoshida M (2013)	23401002	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823315	2539914	3361491	276458	280567	SPBC12D12.01	SPAC1805.08	sad1	dlc1	SPBC16H5.01c	-	Co-localization	physical	Yoshida M (2013)	23401002	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823316	2539914	2542069	276458	278546	SPBC12D12.01	SPAC27D7.13c	sad1	ssm4	SPBC16H5.01c	SPAC637.01c	Co-localization	physical	Yoshida M (2013)	23401002	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823317	2539914	2540392	276458	276920	SPBC12D12.01	SPBC365.15	sad1	alp4	SPBC16H5.01c	-	Co-localization	physical	Yoshida M (2013)	23401002	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823318	2539914	2539467	276458	276030	SPBC12D12.01	SPCC417.07c	sad1	mto1	SPBC16H5.01c	mbo1|mod20	Co-localization	physical	Yoshida M (2013)	23401002	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823319	2543069	3361491	279502	280567	SPAC3A11.05c	SPAC1805.08	kms1	dlc1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Yoshida M (2013)	23401002	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823320	2543069	2540392	279502	276920	SPAC3A11.05c	SPBC365.15	kms1	alp4	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Yoshida M (2013)	23401002	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823321	2539467	2540392	276030	276920	SPCC417.07c	SPBC365.15	mto1	alp4	mbo1|mod20	-	Co-localization	physical	Yoshida M (2013)	23401002	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823322	2543069	2539467	279502	276030	SPAC3A11.05c	SPCC417.07c	kms1	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Co-localization	physical	Yoshida M (2013)	23401002	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823520	3361532	2539640	280608	276195	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC32F12.09	lkh1	rum1	kic1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Yu EY (2013)	23376070	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823521	3361532	2539640	280608	276195	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC32F12.09	lkh1	rum1	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Yu EY (2013)	23376070	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823540	2540745	2539869	277268	276415	SPBC21C3.18	SPBC11B10.09	spo4	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kovacikova I (2013)	23370392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:partial rescue	partial suppression of the spo4 chromosome segregation mutant phenotype by cdc2-as	-	BIOGRID
823709	2540992	2539087	277508	275659	SPBC342.05	SPCC1259.13	crb2	chk1	rhp9	rad27	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Caparelli ML (2013)	23422000	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823710	2542029	2541171	278511	277685	SPAC8E11.02c	SPBC887.09c	rad24	sog2	anr5|sam4	SPBC887.09c|lrp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Gupta S (2013)	23394829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823711	2542029	2539963	278511	276507	SPAC8E11.02c	SPBC17F3.02	rad24	nak1	anr5|sam4	mor4|orb3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Gupta S (2013)	23394829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823712	2542029	2543517	278511	279935	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC3G9.05	rad24	spa2	anr5|sam4	SPAC3G9.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Gupta S (2013)	23394829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823713	2542029	2542358	278511	278823	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC1782.09c	rad24	clp1	anr5|sam4	flp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Gupta S (2013)	23394829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823714	2542029	2539580	278511	276139	SPAC8E11.02c	SPCC645.07	rad24	rgf1	anr5|sam4	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Gupta S (2013)	23394829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823715	2542029	2543372	278511	279794	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAPB1A10.09	rad24	ase1	anr5|sam4	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Gupta S (2013)	23394829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823716	2542029	2542328	278511	278794	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC16E8.08	rad24	SPAC16E8.08	anr5|sam4	pos1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Gupta S (2013)	23394829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823717	2542029	2540267	278511	276798	SPAC8E11.02c	SPBC32C12.03c	rad24	ppk25	anr5|sam4	kin2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Gupta S (2013)	23394829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823718	2542029	2540060	278511	276598	SPAC8E11.02c	SPBC106.01	rad24	mph1	anr5|sam4	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Gupta S (2013)	23394829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823719	2542029	2542011	278511	278494	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC23C11.05	rad24	ipp1	anr5|sam4	SPAC23C11.05|ppa|ppa1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Gupta S (2013)	23394829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823720	2542029	2539358	278511	275924	SPAC8E11.02c	SPCC16C4.07	rad24	scw1	anr5|sam4	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Gupta S (2013)	23394829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823721	2542029	2539149	278511	275721	SPAC8E11.02c	SPCC1739.11c	rad24	cdc11	anr5|sam4	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Gupta S (2013)	23394829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823722	2542029	2539333	278511	275899	SPAC8E11.02c	SPCC1902.02	rad24	mug72	anr5|sam4	SPCC663.16c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Gupta S (2013)	23394829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823723	2541599	2541171	278096	277685	SPAC24B11.11c	SPBC887.09c	sid2	sog2	-	SPBC887.09c|lrp1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Gupta S (2013)	23394829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823724	2541599	2542328	278096	278794	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC16E8.08	sid2	SPAC16E8.08	-	pos1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Gupta S (2013)	23394829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823725	2541599	2539358	278096	275924	SPAC24B11.11c	SPCC16C4.07	sid2	scw1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Gupta S (2013)	23394829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823726	2541599	2539333	278096	275899	SPAC24B11.11c	SPCC1902.02	sid2	mug72	-	SPCC663.16c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Gupta S (2013)	23394829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823727	2541599	2543517	278096	279935	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC3G9.05	sid2	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Biochemical Activity	physical	Gupta S (2013)	23394829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823728	2541599	2539963	278096	276507	SPAC24B11.11c	SPBC17F3.02	sid2	nak1	-	mor4|orb3	Biochemical Activity	physical	Gupta S (2013)	23394829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823729	2541599	2543372	278096	279794	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAPB1A10.09	sid2	ase1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Gupta S (2013)	23394829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823730	2539963	2541171	276507	277685	SPBC17F3.02	SPBC887.09c	nak1	sog2	mor4|orb3	SPBC887.09c|lrp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gupta S (2013)	23394829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823731	2539963	2541317	276507	277829	SPBC17F3.02	SPBP19A11.04c	nak1	mor2	mor4|orb3	cps12	Two-hybrid	physical	Gupta S (2013)	23394829	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
823737	2539481	2540825	276044	277343	SPCC622.16c	SPBC428.08c	epe1	clr4	kdm2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tashiro S (2013)	23388053	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type	deletion of clr4 inhibits the accumulation of mei4 and ssm4 RNA seen in an epe1 overexpression background	-	BIOGRID
824163	2540097	2540589	276635	277115	SPBC11C11.03	SPBC20F10.06	ndc80	mad2	ndc10|tid3	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tang NH (2013)	23427262	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:wild type	MAD2 deletion abolishes mitotic delay seen in ndc80-NH12 mutants	-	BIOGRID
824164	2543382	2540097	279804	276635	SPAC890.02c	SPBC11C11.03	alp7	ndc80	mia1	ndc10|tid3	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Tang NH (2013)	23427262	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
824165	2543382	2539497	279804	276060	SPAC890.02c	SPCC895.07	alp7	alp14	mia1	mtc1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Tang NH (2013)	23427262	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
824166	2543382	2540097	279804	276635	SPAC890.02c	SPBC11C11.03	alp7	ndc80	mia1	ndc10|tid3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tang NH (2013)	23427262	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
824167	2540097	2543382	276635	279804	SPBC11C11.03	SPAC890.02c	ndc80	alp7	ndc10|tid3	mia1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tang NH (2013)	23427262	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
824168	2543382	2540097	279804	276635	SPAC890.02c	SPBC11C11.03	alp7	ndc80	mia1	ndc10|tid3	Protein-peptide	physical	Tang NH (2013)	23427262	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
824169	2540097	2543382	276635	279804	SPBC11C11.03	SPAC890.02c	ndc80	alp7	ndc10|tid3	mia1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tang NH (2013)	23427262	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	growth in exponential phase:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	ALP7 tethering rescues growth of ndc80-NH12 mutant	-	BIOGRID
824170	2540097	2539505	276635	276068	SPBC11C11.03	SPCC736.14	ndc80	dis1	ndc10|tid3	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tang NH (2013)	23427262	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	ndc80-NH12 allele|tetrad dissection	-	BIOGRID
825328	2539436	2539550	275999	276111	SPCC645.04	SPCC550.05	nse3	nse1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Hudson JJ (2011)	21364888	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
825329	2539436	3361330	275999	280406	SPCC645.04	SPBC20F10.04c	nse3	nse4	-	rad62	Two-hybrid	physical	Hudson JJ (2011)	21364888	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
827355	2542873	2542988	279318	279426	SPAC9G1.02	SPAC1006.09	wis4	win1	wak1|wik1	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Morigasaki S (2013)	23389634	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	osmotic stress resistance|protein/peptide modification	wis4 win1 has decreased Spc1 phosphorylation in response to osmostress	-	BIOGRID
827356	2542873	2542988	279318	279426	SPAC9G1.02	SPAC1006.09	wis4	win1	wak1|wik1	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Morigasaki S (2013)	23389634	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
827357	2542988	2542873	279426	279318	SPAC1006.09	SPAC9G1.02	win1	wis4	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	wak1|wik1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Morigasaki S (2013)	23389634	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
827358	2542988	2542873	279426	279318	SPAC1006.09	SPAC9G1.02	win1	wis4	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	wak1|wik1	Two-hybrid	physical	Morigasaki S (2013)	23389634	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
827359	2542873	2541209	279318	277723	SPAC9G1.02	SPBC887.10	wis4	mcs4	wak1|wik1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Morigasaki S (2013)	23389634	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
827360	2542873	2541209	279318	277723	SPAC9G1.02	SPBC887.10	wis4	mcs4	wak1|wik1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Morigasaki S (2013)	23389634	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
827361	2542988	2541209	279426	277723	SPAC1006.09	SPBC887.10	win1	mcs4	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Morigasaki S (2013)	23389634	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
829444	2539190	2540589	275761	277115	SPCC1259.15c	SPBC20F10.06	ubc11	mad2	ubcdp|ubcp4	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Horikoshi Y (2013)	23442800	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	MAD2 deletion rescues temperature-sensitivity of ubc11-P93L mutant	-	BIOGRID
829445	2539190	2543222	275761	279650	SPCC1259.15c	SPAC821.08c	ubc11	slp1	ubcdp|ubcp4	cdc20	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Horikoshi Y (2013)	23442800	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	slp1-mr63 mutation rescues temperature-sensitivity of ubc11-P93L mutant	-	BIOGRID
829446	2539190	2541030	275761	277545	SPCC1259.15c	SPBC337.08c	ubc11	ubi4	ubcdp|ubcp4	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Horikoshi Y (2013)	23442800	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	E1: Ptr3	-	BIOGRID
829447	2542880	2543222	279325	279650	SPAC6F12.14	SPAC821.08c	cut23	slp1	apc8	cdc20	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Horikoshi Y (2013)	23442800	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
829448	2542880	2540589	279325	277115	SPAC6F12.14	SPBC20F10.06	cut23	mad2	apc8	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Horikoshi Y (2013)	23442800	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
829449	2540083	2539190	276621	275761	SPBC119.02	SPCC1259.15c	ubc4	ubc11	-	ubcdp|ubcp4	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Horikoshi Y (2013)	23442800	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	ubc4 ubc11 double mutant has increased Cdc13 levels (in nda3 background)	-	BIOGRID
829450	2541030	2543222	277545	279650	SPBC337.08c	SPAC821.08c	ubi4	slp1	-	cdc20	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Horikoshi Y (2013)	23442800	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	likely ubiquitin conjugate	-	BIOGRID
829914	2540784	2539164	277303	275735	SPBC211.04c	SPCC16A11.17	mcm6	mcm4	mis5	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Co-purification	physical	Xu M (2013)	23444842	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	hexamer of Mcm4, Mcm6, Mcm7	-	BIOGRID
829915	2540784	2540630	277303	277156	SPBC211.04c	SPBC25D12.03c	mcm6	mcm7	mis5	-	Co-purification	physical	Xu M (2013)	23444842	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	hexamer of Mcm4, Mcm6, Mcm7	-	BIOGRID
829916	2540784	2540784	277303	277303	SPBC211.04c	SPBC211.04c	mcm6	mcm6	mis5	mis5	Co-purification	physical	Xu M (2013)	23444842	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	N-terminal fragments form dimer	-	BIOGRID
829917	2540630	2540630	277156	277156	SPBC25D12.03c	SPBC25D12.03c	mcm7	mcm7	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Xu M (2013)	23444842	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	N-terminal fragments form dimer	-	BIOGRID
832749	2539550	2539020	276111	275593	SPCC550.05	SPCC5E4.06	nse1	smc6	-	rad18	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Harvey SH (2004)	14701739	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
852264	3361036	2541193	280112	277707	SPCC320.13c	SPBC776.02c	ark1	dis2	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	bws1|sds1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kawashima SA (2013)	23438755	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:wild type|organelle distribution:wild type	Ark1 chemical inhibitor Arkin-1 causes nucleolus separation defects and defects in the separation of chr3 arms (similar to ark1 mutant) and these defects are suppressed by deleteion of dis2, PP1 subunit	-	BIOGRID
853592	2540398	2540398	276926	276926	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC26H8.10	dis3	dis3	rrp44	rrp44	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Malecki M (2013)	23503588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
853593	2540398	2541813	276926	278304	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC2F7.14c	dis3	rrp4	rrp44	SPAC2F7.14c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Malecki M (2013)	23503588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
853594	2540398	2540116	276926	276653	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC16G5.10	dis3	rrp42	rrp44	SPBC16G5.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Malecki M (2013)	23503588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
853595	2540398	2540189	276926	276722	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC17D1.03c	dis3	rrp43	rrp44	SPBC17D1.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Malecki M (2013)	23503588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
853596	2540398	2539106	276926	275678	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC757.08	dis3	rrp45	rrp44	SPCC757.08	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Malecki M (2013)	23503588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
853597	2540398	2540412	276926	276940	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC211.08c	dis3	mtr3	rrp44	SPBC211.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Malecki M (2013)	23503588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
853598	2540398	2541837	276926	278328	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC22A12.12c	dis3	rrp40	rrp44	SPAC22A12.12c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Malecki M (2013)	23503588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
853599	2540398	2543451	276926	279871	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC3G9.10c	dis3	rrp41	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Malecki M (2013)	23503588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
853600	2540398	2539660	276926	276215	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC115.01c	dis3	rrp46	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Malecki M (2013)	23503588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
853601	2540398	2539351	276926	275917	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC1840.11	dis3	csl4	rrp44	SPCC965.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Malecki M (2013)	23503588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
853602	2540398	2543630	276926	280044	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC1F3.01	dis3	rrp6	rrp44	SPAC3H8.11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Malecki M (2013)	23503588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
853603	2540398	2541693	276926	278189	SPBC26H8.10	SPAP8A3.05	dis3	ski7	rrp44	SPAP8A3.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Malecki M (2013)	23503588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
853604	2540398	2539105	276926	275677	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC1739.07	dis3	cti1	rrp44	lrp1|rrp47	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Malecki M (2013)	23503588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
853605	2540189	2540398	276722	276926	SPBC17D1.03c	SPBC26H8.10	rrp43	dis3	SPBC17D1.03c	rrp44	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Malecki M (2013)	23503588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
853606	2540189	2541813	276722	278304	SPBC17D1.03c	SPAC2F7.14c	rrp43	rrp4	SPBC17D1.03c	SPAC2F7.14c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Malecki M (2013)	23503588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
853607	2540189	2540116	276722	276653	SPBC17D1.03c	SPBC16G5.10	rrp43	rrp42	SPBC17D1.03c	SPBC16G5.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Malecki M (2013)	23503588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
853608	2540189	2540189	276722	276722	SPBC17D1.03c	SPBC17D1.03c	rrp43	rrp43	SPBC17D1.03c	SPBC17D1.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Malecki M (2013)	23503588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
853609	2540189	2539106	276722	275678	SPBC17D1.03c	SPCC757.08	rrp43	rrp45	SPBC17D1.03c	SPCC757.08	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Malecki M (2013)	23503588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
853610	2540189	2540412	276722	276940	SPBC17D1.03c	SPBC211.08c	rrp43	mtr3	SPBC17D1.03c	SPBC211.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Malecki M (2013)	23503588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
853611	2540189	2541837	276722	278328	SPBC17D1.03c	SPAC22A12.12c	rrp43	rrp40	SPBC17D1.03c	SPAC22A12.12c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Malecki M (2013)	23503588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
853612	2540189	2543451	276722	279871	SPBC17D1.03c	SPAC3G9.10c	rrp43	rrp41	SPBC17D1.03c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Malecki M (2013)	23503588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
853613	2540189	2539660	276722	276215	SPBC17D1.03c	SPBC115.01c	rrp43	rrp46	SPBC17D1.03c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Malecki M (2013)	23503588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
853614	2540189	2539351	276722	275917	SPBC17D1.03c	SPCC1840.11	rrp43	csl4	SPBC17D1.03c	SPCC965.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Malecki M (2013)	23503588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
853615	2540189	2543630	276722	280044	SPBC17D1.03c	SPAC1F3.01	rrp43	rrp6	SPBC17D1.03c	SPAC3H8.11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Malecki M (2013)	23503588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
853616	2540189	2541693	276722	278189	SPBC17D1.03c	SPAP8A3.05	rrp43	ski7	SPBC17D1.03c	SPAP8A3.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Malecki M (2013)	23503588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
853617	2540189	2539105	276722	275677	SPBC17D1.03c	SPCC1739.07	rrp43	cti1	SPBC17D1.03c	lrp1|rrp47	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Malecki M (2013)	23503588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
853618	2540189	2542214	276722	278688	SPBC17D1.03c	SPACUNK4.11c	rrp43	mpp6	SPBC17D1.03c	SPACUNK4.11c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Malecki M (2013)	23503588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
853619	2542643	2542204	279097	278679	SPAC2C4.07c	SPAC17A5.14	dis32	exo2	SPAC2C4.07c|dis3L2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Malecki M (2013)	23503588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
853620	2542204	2538841	278679	275422	SPAC17A5.14	SPCC550.03c	exo2	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Malecki M (2013)	23503588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
853621	2542643	2540520	279097	277048	SPAC2C4.07c	SPBC3D6.08c	dis32	lsm1	SPAC2C4.07c|dis3L2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Malecki M (2013)	23503588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
853622	2542643	2540520	279097	277048	SPAC2C4.07c	SPBC3D6.08c	dis32	lsm1	SPAC2C4.07c|dis3L2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Malecki M (2013)	23503588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation[decreased rate^increased]	either single mutant alone shows some mRNA accumulation, but double mutant shows increased stabilization of some mRNAs	-	BIOGRID
853627	2541733	2540129	278227	276666	SPAC27F1.03c	SPBC12D12.08c	uch1	ned8	-	SPBC24C6.01c|nedd8|ubl1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	O'Donoghue JE (2013)	23496905	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	the bait protein can process fluorogenic Nedd8 substrate	-	BIOGRID
853628	2540956	2540129	277472	276666	SPBC409.06	SPBC12D12.08c	uch2	ned8	-	SPBC24C6.01c|nedd8|ubl1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	O'Donoghue JE (2013)	23496905	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	the bait protein can process fluorogenic Nedd8 substrate	-	BIOGRID
853629	2539808	2540129	276358	276666	SPBC17D11.01	SPBC12D12.08c	nep1	ned8	SPBC20F10.11	SPBC24C6.01c|nedd8|ubl1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	O'Donoghue JE (2013)	23496905	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	the bait protein can process fluorogenic Nedd8 substrate	-	BIOGRID
853630	2540263	2540129	276794	276666	SPBC32H8.02c	SPBC12D12.08c	nep2	ned8	mug120|pi021|SPACTOKYO_453.14c	SPBC24C6.01c|nedd8|ubl1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	O'Donoghue JE (2013)	23496905	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	the bait protein can process fluorogenic Nedd8 substrate	-	BIOGRID
853634	2541733	2540956	278227	277472	SPAC27F1.03c	SPBC409.06	uch1	uch2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	O'Donoghue JE (2013)	23496905	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification[decreased]	quadruple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 and quintuple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 csn5 cells show reduced Nedd8 processing compared to any of the single, double or triple mutants.	-	BIOGRID
853635	2541733	2539808	278227	276358	SPAC27F1.03c	SPBC17D11.01	uch1	nep1	-	SPBC20F10.11	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	O'Donoghue JE (2013)	23496905	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification[decreased]	quadruple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 and quintuple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 csn5 cells show reduced Nedd8 processing compared to any of the single, double or triple mutants.	-	BIOGRID
853636	2541733	2540263	278227	276794	SPAC27F1.03c	SPBC32H8.02c	uch1	nep2	-	mug120|pi021|SPACTOKYO_453.14c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	O'Donoghue JE (2013)	23496905	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification[decreased]	quadruple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 and quintuple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 csn5 cells show reduced Nedd8 processing compared to any of the single, double or triple mutants.	-	BIOGRID
853637	2541733	2541529	278227	278029	SPAC27F1.03c	SPAC1687.13c	uch1	csn5	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	O'Donoghue JE (2013)	23496905	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification[decreased]	quadruple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 and quintuple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 csn5 cells show reduced Nedd8 processing compared to any of the single, double or triple mutants.	-	BIOGRID
853638	2540956	2541733	277472	278227	SPBC409.06	SPAC27F1.03c	uch2	uch1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	O'Donoghue JE (2013)	23496905	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification[decreased]	quadruple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 and quintuple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 csn5 cells show reduced Nedd8 processing compared to any of the single, double or triple mutants.	-	BIOGRID
853639	2540956	2539808	277472	276358	SPBC409.06	SPBC17D11.01	uch2	nep1	-	SPBC20F10.11	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	O'Donoghue JE (2013)	23496905	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification[decreased]	quadruple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 and quintuple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 csn5 cells show reduced Nedd8 processing compared to any of the single, double or triple mutants.	-	BIOGRID
853640	2540956	2540263	277472	276794	SPBC409.06	SPBC32H8.02c	uch2	nep2	-	mug120|pi021|SPACTOKYO_453.14c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	O'Donoghue JE (2013)	23496905	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification[decreased]	quadruple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 and quintuple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 csn5 cells show reduced Nedd8 processing compared to any of the single, double or triple mutants.	-	BIOGRID
853641	2540956	2541529	277472	278029	SPBC409.06	SPAC1687.13c	uch2	csn5	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	O'Donoghue JE (2013)	23496905	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification[decreased]	quadruple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 and quintuple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 csn5 cells show reduced Nedd8 processing compared to any of the single, double or triple mutants.	-	BIOGRID
853642	2539808	2541733	276358	278227	SPBC17D11.01	SPAC27F1.03c	nep1	uch1	SPBC20F10.11	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	O'Donoghue JE (2013)	23496905	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification[decreased]	quadruple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 and quintuple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 csn5 cells show reduced Nedd8 processing compared to any of the single, double or triple mutants.	-	BIOGRID
853643	2539808	2540956	276358	277472	SPBC17D11.01	SPBC409.06	nep1	uch2	SPBC20F10.11	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	O'Donoghue JE (2013)	23496905	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification[decreased]	quadruple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 and quintuple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 csn5 cells show reduced Nedd8 processing compared to any of the single, double or triple mutants.	-	BIOGRID
853644	2539808	2540263	276358	276794	SPBC17D11.01	SPBC32H8.02c	nep1	nep2	SPBC20F10.11	mug120|pi021|SPACTOKYO_453.14c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	O'Donoghue JE (2013)	23496905	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification[decreased]	quadruple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 and quintuple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 csn5 cells show reduced Nedd8 processing compared to any of the single, double or triple mutants.	-	BIOGRID
853645	2539808	2541529	276358	278029	SPBC17D11.01	SPAC1687.13c	nep1	csn5	SPBC20F10.11	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	O'Donoghue JE (2013)	23496905	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification[decreased]	quadruple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 and quintuple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 csn5 cells show reduced Nedd8 processing compared to any of the single, double or triple mutants.	-	BIOGRID
853646	2540263	2541733	276794	278227	SPBC32H8.02c	SPAC27F1.03c	nep2	uch1	mug120|pi021|SPACTOKYO_453.14c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	O'Donoghue JE (2013)	23496905	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification[decreased]	quadruple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 and quintuple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 csn5 cells show reduced Nedd8 processing compared to any of the single, double or triple mutants.	-	BIOGRID
853647	2540263	2540956	276794	277472	SPBC32H8.02c	SPBC409.06	nep2	uch2	mug120|pi021|SPACTOKYO_453.14c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	O'Donoghue JE (2013)	23496905	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification[decreased]	quadruple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 and quintuple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 csn5 cells show reduced Nedd8 processing compared to any of the single, double or triple mutants.	-	BIOGRID
853648	2540263	2539808	276794	276358	SPBC32H8.02c	SPBC17D11.01	nep2	nep1	mug120|pi021|SPACTOKYO_453.14c	SPBC20F10.11	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	O'Donoghue JE (2013)	23496905	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification[decreased]	quadruple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 and quintuple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 csn5 cells show reduced Nedd8 processing compared to any of the single, double or triple mutants.	-	BIOGRID
853649	2540263	2541529	276794	278029	SPBC32H8.02c	SPAC1687.13c	nep2	csn5	mug120|pi021|SPACTOKYO_453.14c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	O'Donoghue JE (2013)	23496905	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification[decreased]	quadruple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 and quintuple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 csn5 cells show reduced Nedd8 processing compared to any of the single, double or triple mutants.	-	BIOGRID
853650	2541529	2541733	278029	278227	SPAC1687.13c	SPAC27F1.03c	csn5	uch1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	O'Donoghue JE (2013)	23496905	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification[decreased]	quadruple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 and quintuple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 csn5 cells show reduced Nedd8 processing compared to any of the single, double or triple mutants.	-	BIOGRID
853651	2541529	2540956	278029	277472	SPAC1687.13c	SPBC409.06	csn5	uch2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	O'Donoghue JE (2013)	23496905	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification[decreased]	quadruple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 and quintuple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 csn5 cells show reduced Nedd8 processing compared to any of the single, double or triple mutants.	-	BIOGRID
853652	2541529	2539808	278029	276358	SPAC1687.13c	SPBC17D11.01	csn5	nep1	-	SPBC20F10.11	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	O'Donoghue JE (2013)	23496905	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification[decreased]	quadruple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 and quintuple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 csn5 cells show reduced Nedd8 processing compared to any of the single, double or triple mutants.	-	BIOGRID
853653	2541529	2540263	278029	276794	SPAC1687.13c	SPBC32H8.02c	csn5	nep2	-	mug120|pi021|SPACTOKYO_453.14c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	O'Donoghue JE (2013)	23496905	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification[decreased]	quadruple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 and quintuple nep1 nep2 uch1 uch2 csn5 cells show reduced Nedd8 processing compared to any of the single, double or triple mutants.	-	BIOGRID
853655	2539881	2541620	276427	278117	SPBC16G5.12c	SPAC2G11.12	top3	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Norman-Axelsson U (2013)	23516381	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	death of top3 mutant rescued by deletion of rqh1|top3 rqh1 double mutant cells slower than wild type or single rqh1  mutants	-	BIOGRID
853656	2539881	2543580	276427	279995	SPBC16G5.12c	SPAC644.14c	top3	rad51	-	rhp51	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Norman-Axelsson U (2013)	23516381	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	death of top3 deletion mutant rescued by deletion of rqh1|however, heat sensitivity of top3-105 mutant is not rescued by rqh1 deletion	-	BIOGRID
853657	2539881	2543580	276427	279995	SPBC16G5.12c	SPAC644.14c	top3	rad51	-	rhp51	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Norman-Axelsson U (2013)	23516381	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	rqh1 top3-105 double mutant shows synthetic growth defect not seen with rqh1 top3 double deletion strain	-	BIOGRID
854571	2538768	2541544	275351	278044	SPCC330.05c	SPAC22G7.06c	ura4	ura1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Matsuo Y (2013)	23555823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	cell lysis of ura4 mutant is suppressed by mutating additional ura genes	-	BIOGRID
854572	2538768	2542745	275351	279195	SPCC330.05c	SPAC16.03c	ura4	ura2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Matsuo Y (2013)	23555823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	cell lysis of ura4 mutant is suppressed by mutating additional ura genes	-	BIOGRID
854573	2538768	2542781	275351	279230	SPCC330.05c	SPAC57A10.12c	ura4	ura3	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Matsuo Y (2013)	23555823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	cell lysis of ura4 mutant is suppressed by mutating additional ura genes	-	BIOGRID
854574	2538768	2541166	275351	277681	SPCC330.05c	SPBC725.15	ura4	ura5	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Matsuo Y (2013)	23555823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	cell lysis of ura4 mutant is suppressed by mutating additional ura genes	-	BIOGRID
854575	2538768	2540411	275351	276939	SPCC330.05c	SPBC2D10.18	ura4	abc1	-	coq8	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Matsuo Y (2013)	23555823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	cell lysis of ura4 mutant is suppressed by mutating coq8	-	BIOGRID
854576	2538768	2540411	275351	276939	SPCC330.05c	SPBC2D10.18	ura4	abc1	-	coq8	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Matsuo Y (2013)	23555823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
854577	2538768	2541166	275351	277681	SPCC330.05c	SPBC725.15	ura4	ura5	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Matsuo Y (2013)	23555823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
854578	2538768	2542781	275351	279230	SPCC330.05c	SPAC57A10.12c	ura4	ura3	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Matsuo Y (2013)	23555823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
854579	2538768	2542745	275351	279195	SPCC330.05c	SPAC16.03c	ura4	ura2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Matsuo Y (2013)	23555823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
854580	2538768	2541544	275351	278044	SPCC330.05c	SPAC22G7.06c	ura4	ura1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Matsuo Y (2013)	23555823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
856185	2540948	2542140	277464	278616	SPBC365.13c	SPAC1783.07c	hba1	pap1	caf1	caf3	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kitamura K (2011)	21410566	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Deletion of PAP1 rescues the growth defect of an ubr1 caf1 double mutant. (ubr1 caf1 pap1 triple mutant)	-	BIOGRID
856186	2540764	2540948	277284	277464	SPBC19C7.02	SPBC365.13c	ubr1	hba1	SPBC32F12.14	caf1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kitamura K (2011)	21410566	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
858457	2539434	2540019	275997	276563	SPCC757.09c	SPBC1685.01	rnc1	pmp1	-	dsp1	Protein-RNA	physical	Taga A (2010)	20692117	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	affinity capillary electrophoresis (ACE)|studied by in vitro binding assays (Affinity capillary electrophoresis).	-	BIOGRID
858911	2543298	2541943	279723	278430	SPAC6B12.15	SPAC222.07c	cpc2	hri2	rkp1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tarumoto Y (2013)	23671279	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient utilization	impaired phosphorylation of eIF2alpha in cpc2 mutant cells is further reduced in hri2 cpc2 double mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
858912	2540500	2540500	277028	277028	SPBC36B7.09	SPBC36B7.09	gcn2	gcn2	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tarumoto Y (2013)	23671279	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Gcn2 protein can interact with itself by Co-IP, independent of Cpc2 protein	-	BIOGRID
858913	2540500	2540500	277028	277028	SPBC36B7.09	SPBC36B7.09	gcn2	gcn2	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	Biochemical Activity	physical	Tarumoto Y (2013)	23671279	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	Gcn2 protein can phosphorylate itself, by IP kinase assay	-	BIOGRID
858914	2540500	2539797	277028	276347	SPBC36B7.09	SPBC16G5.14c	gcn2	rps3	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	-	Co-fractionation	physical	Tarumoto Y (2013)	23671279	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Gcn2 co-fractionates with ribosomes independently of Cpc2	-	BIOGRID
858916	2540135	2543460	276672	279880	SPBC16C6.11	SPAC3H5.10	rpl3201	rpl3202	rpl32-1	rpl32|rpl32-2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sun L (2013)	23577148	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:wild type	total Rpl32 protein levels restored	-	BIOGRID
858917	2543460	2540135	279880	276672	SPAC3H5.10	SPBC16C6.11	rpl3202	rpl3201	rpl32|rpl32-2	rpl32-1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sun L (2013)	23577148	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:wild type	total Rpl32 protein levels restored	-	BIOGRID
858918	2540135	2543460	276672	279880	SPBC16C6.11	SPAC3H5.10	rpl3201	rpl3202	rpl32-1	rpl32|rpl32-2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Sun L (2013)	23577148	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
858919	2543460	2540135	279880	276672	SPAC3H5.10	SPBC16C6.11	rpl3202	rpl3201	rpl32|rpl32-2	rpl32-1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Sun L (2013)	23577148	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
858920	2542727	2542558	279177	279014	SPAC26A3.02	SPAC1952.07	myh1	rad1	myh	rad19	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Jansson K (2013)	23677513	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	growth defect in the presence of DNA damaging compounds cisplatin, oxaliplatin, phleomycin, or bleomycin	-	BIOGRID
859089	2542393	2542393	278857	278857	SPAC17G6.12	SPAC17G6.12	cul1	cul1	pcu1	pcu1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wu S (2013)	23535663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
859090	2542393	2541897	278857	278387	SPAC17G6.12	SPAC23H4.18c	cul1	rbx1	pcu1	pip1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wu S (2013)	23535663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
859091	2542393	2540917	278857	277433	SPAC17G6.12	SPBC409.05	cul1	skp1	pcu1	psh1|sph1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wu S (2013)	23535663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
859092	2542393	2540352	278857	276881	SPAC17G6.12	SPBC215.03c	cul1	csn1	pcu1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wu S (2013)	23535663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
859093	2542393	3361420	278857	280496	SPAC17G6.12	SPAPB17E12.04c	cul1	csn2	pcu1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wu S (2013)	23535663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
859094	2542393	2541517	278857	278018	SPAC17G6.12	SPAC22A12.03c	cul1	csn4	pcu1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wu S (2013)	23535663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
859095	2542393	2541529	278857	278029	SPAC17G6.12	SPAC1687.13c	cul1	csn5	pcu1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wu S (2013)	23535663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
859096	2542393	2542914	278857	279356	SPAC17G6.12	SPAC57A10.05c	cul1	pof1	pcu1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wu S (2013)	23535663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
859097	2542393	2542810	278857	279258	SPAC17G6.12	SPAC6F6.02c	cul1	pof5	pcu1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wu S (2013)	23535663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
859098	2542393	2539142	278857	275714	SPAC17G6.12	SPCC1827.08c	cul1	pof7	pcu1	SPCC70.11c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wu S (2013)	23535663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
859099	2542393	2540997	278857	277513	SPAC17G6.12	SPBC3H7.06c	cul1	pof9	pcu1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wu S (2013)	23535663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
859100	2542393	2539767	278857	276318	SPAC17G6.12	SPBC1703.06	cul1	pof10	pcu1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wu S (2013)	23535663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
859101	2542393	2541707	278857	278202	SPAC17G6.12	SPAC29E6.01	cul1	pof11	pcu1	SPAC30.05|mug156	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wu S (2013)	23535663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
859102	2542393	2542815	278857	279262	SPAC17G6.12	SPAC13D6.01	cul1	pof14	pcu1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wu S (2013)	23535663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
859103	2542393	2540511	278857	277039	SPAC17G6.12	SPBC1718.01	cul1	pop1	pcu1	SPBC2G2.18|ste16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wu S (2013)	23535663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
859104	2542393	2543514	278857	279932	SPAC17G6.12	SPAC4D7.03	cul1	pop2	pcu1	sud1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wu S (2013)	23535663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
859105	2542914	2542393	279356	278857	SPAC57A10.05c	SPAC17G6.12	pof1	cul1	-	pcu1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wu S (2013)	23535663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
859106	2539767	2542393	276318	278857	SPBC1703.06	SPAC17G6.12	pof10	cul1	-	pcu1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wu S (2013)	23535663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
859107	2542393	2539767	278857	276318	SPAC17G6.12	SPBC1703.06	cul1	pof10	pcu1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wu S (2013)	23535663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
859108	2542393	2541897	278857	278387	SPAC17G6.12	SPAC23H4.18c	cul1	rbx1	pcu1	pip1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wu S (2013)	23535663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
859899	2539047	2539047	275620	275620	SPCC1223.06	SPCC1223.06	tea1	tea1	alp8	alp8	Two-hybrid	physical	Dodgson J (2013)	23673619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	tandem 3GBP (GFP-Binding Protein) construct, which can bind up to three GFP-labelled proteins in cells, co-expressed with Tea1-GFP, leads to Tea1 clusters	-	BIOGRID
859900	2539047	2539642	275620	276197	SPCC1223.06	SPBC1706.01	tea1	tea4	alp8	wsh3	Two-hybrid	physical	Dodgson J (2013)	23673619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	tandem 3GBP (GFP-Binding Protein) construct, which can bind up to three GFP-labelled proteins in cells, co-expressed with Tea4-GFP, leads to Tea1-Tea4 clusters	-	BIOGRID
859910	2542200	2541652	278675	278148	SPAC19D5.01	SPAC24B11.06c	pyp2	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kowalczyk KM (2013)	23690545	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
859911	2542200	2541652	278675	278148	SPAC19D5.01	SPAC24B11.06c	pyp2	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kowalczyk KM (2013)	23690545	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	S234 is phosphorylated	-	BIOGRID
859918	5802740	2540291	857878	276822	SPNCRNA.103	SPBC337.12	sme2	red5	SPNCRNA.1341	SPBC337.12	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sugiyama T (2013)	23658229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation efficiency	red5-2 allele	-	BIOGRID
859945	2539733	2540291	276285	276822	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC337.12	pab2	red5	-	SPBC337.12	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sugiyama T (2013)	23658229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
859947	2540291	2539741	276822	276293	SPBC337.12	SPBC16A3.05c	red5	rae1	SPBC337.12	cut21	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sugiyama T (2013)	23658229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	rae1-167 allele	-	BIOGRID
859948	2540291	2542537	276822	278994	SPBC337.12	SPAC19D5.04	red5	ptr1	SPBC337.12	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sugiyama T (2013)	23658229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	ptr1-1 allele;  weak growth defect at 30 deg C	-	BIOGRID
859949	2540291	2540184	276822	276717	SPBC337.12	SPBC106.12c	red5	SPBC106.12c	SPBC337.12	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sugiyama T (2013)	23658229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	red5-2 allele	-	BIOGRID
859950	2540291	2543058	276822	279492	SPBC337.12	SPAC3G6.02	red5	rpn15	SPBC337.12	dss1|sem1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sugiyama T (2013)	23658229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	red5-2 allele	-	BIOGRID
859951	2540291	2539733	276822	276285	SPBC337.12	SPBC16E9.12c	red5	pab2	SPBC337.12	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sugiyama T (2013)	23658229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	red5-2 allele	-	BIOGRID
859952	2540291	2540727	276822	277250	SPBC337.12	SPBC1921.03c	red5	mex67	SPBC337.12	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sugiyama T (2013)	23658229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	red5-2 allele	-	BIOGRID
859954	2540291	2542433	276822	278895	SPBC337.12	SPAC17G6.14c	red5	uap56	SPBC337.12	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sugiyama T (2013)	23658229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	red5-2 and uap56-1 alleles;  defect at 37 deg C	-	BIOGRID
859955	2543058	2540291	279492	276822	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC337.12	rpn15	red5	dss1|sem1	SPBC337.12	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sugiyama T (2013)	23658229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	red5-2 allele; improved growth at 18 deg C	-	BIOGRID
859956	2542433	2540291	278895	276822	SPAC17G6.14c	SPBC337.12	uap56	red5	-	SPBC337.12	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sugiyama T (2013)	23658229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	uap56-1 and red5-2 alleles; improved growth at 18 deg C	-	BIOGRID
859957	2543058	2540291	279492	276822	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC337.12	rpn15	red5	dss1|sem1	SPBC337.12	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Sugiyama T (2013)	23658229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
859958	2540565	2540291	277092	276822	SPBC1D7.04	SPBC337.12	mlo3	red5	-	SPBC337.12	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Sugiyama T (2013)	23658229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
859959	2542537	2540291	278994	276822	SPAC19D5.04	SPBC337.12	ptr1	red5	-	SPBC337.12	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Sugiyama T (2013)	23658229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
859961	2540291	2540505	276822	277033	SPBC337.12	SPBC3B9.16c	red5	nup120	SPBC337.12	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sugiyama T (2013)	23658229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
859963	2539669	2541847	276224	278338	SPBC11C11.04c	SPAC22H10.10	alp1	alp21	-	sto1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mori R (2013)	23576550	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
859964	2539669	2543188	276224	279617	SPBC11C11.04c	SPAC328.08c	alp1	tbc1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mori R (2013)	23576550	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
859965	2541847	2539669	278338	276224	SPAC22H10.10	SPBC11C11.04c	alp21	alp1	sto1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mori R (2013)	23576550	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
859966	2541847	2543188	278338	279617	SPAC22H10.10	SPAC328.08c	alp21	tbc1	sto1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mori R (2013)	23576550	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
859974	2541769	2543188	278263	279617	SPAC22F3.05c	SPAC328.08c	alp41	tbc1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mori R (2013)	23576550	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
859975	2541769	2543188	278263	279617	SPAC22F3.05c	SPAC328.08c	alp41	tbc1	-	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Mori R (2013)	23576550	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
859976	2543188	2541769	279617	278263	SPAC328.08c	SPAC22F3.05c	tbc1	alp41	-	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Mori R (2013)	23576550	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
859977	2543188	2541769	279617	278263	SPAC328.08c	SPAC22F3.05c	tbc1	alp41	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Mori R (2013)	23576550	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	tbc1-11 and alp41-14 alleles; heat sensitivity partially rescued	-	BIOGRID
859978	2541769	2539669	278263	276224	SPAC22F3.05c	SPBC11C11.04c	alp41	alp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mori R (2013)	23576550	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	interaction observed for GDP bound form Alp41-T47A, but not for GTP bound form Alp41-Q70L	-	BIOGRID
859979	2541769	2539669	278263	276224	SPAC22F3.05c	SPBC11C11.04c	alp41	alp1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Mori R (2013)	23576550	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	alp1-1315 allele	-	BIOGRID
859980	2543188	2539669	279617	276224	SPAC328.08c	SPBC11C11.04c	tbc1	alp1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Mori R (2013)	23576550	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	alp1-1315 allele	-	BIOGRID
859984	2539669	2541769	276224	278263	SPBC11C11.04c	SPAC22F3.05c	alp1	alp41	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mori R (2013)	23576550	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	GDP-bound form of Alp41 (T30N) co-overproduced with Alp1 suppresses the disruption in microtubule structure caused by overproduction of Alp1	-	BIOGRID
859987	2541633	2540047	278129	276585	SPAC664.01c	SPBC16C6.10	swi6	chp2	SPAC824.10c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ayguen O (2013)	23604080	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	increased histone H3 replacement at pericentromeric regions	-	BIOGRID
860097	5901	2541863	111837	278353	OK/SW-cl.81	SPAC22E12.07	RAN	rna1	ARA24|Gsp1|TC4	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Seewald MJ (2002)	11832950	9606	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
860098	5902	2541863	111838	278353	-	SPAC22E12.07	RANBP1	rna1	HTF9A	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Seewald MJ (2002)	11832950	9606	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
860226	2539403	2539481	275968	276044	SPCC736.11	SPCC622.16c	ago1	epe1	csp9	kdm2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ayguen O (2013)	23604080	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|silencing:wild type	suppression of centromeric silencing, histone H3 replacement across pericentromeric heterochromatin domain, and sensitivity to thiabendazole (CHEBI:45979)	-	BIOGRID
860240	2539838	2539838	276387	276387	SPBC1347.10	SPBC1347.10	cdc23	cdc23	mcm10	mcm10	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Zhang Z (2013)	23583778	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Cdc23 forms a homodimer in the crystal structure	-	BIOGRID
860241	2539963	2541171	276507	277685	SPBC17F3.02	SPBC887.09c	nak1	sog2	mor4|orb3	SPBC887.09c|lrp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Kume K (2013)	23649273	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
860242	2539016	2543441	275589	279861	SPCC970.04c	SPAC821.12	mob2	orb6	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kume K (2013)	23649273	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
860245	2541728	2540500	278222	277028	SPAC20G4.03c	SPBC36B7.09	hri1	gcn2	-	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Martin R (2013)	23687372	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	decreased growth on 0.1% glucose	-	BIOGRID
860246	2541943	2540500	278430	277028	SPAC222.07c	SPBC36B7.09	hri2	gcn2	-	SPBP18G5.01|ppk28	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Martin R (2013)	23687372	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	decreased growth on 0.1% glucose	-	BIOGRID
860261	2541861	2540043	278351	276581	SPAC5D6.08c	SPBC1198.12	mes1	mfr1	-	SPBC660.02|fzr1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Aoi Y (2013)	23628763	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	cuf2 suppression of mes1 sporulation defects is reversed by overexpression of fzr1+	-	BIOGRID
860262	2539483	2540043	276046	276581	SPCC584.02	SPBC1198.12	cuf2	mfr1	-	SPBC660.02|fzr1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Aoi Y (2013)	23628763	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	cuf2 suppression of mes1 sporulation defects is reversed by overexpression of fzr1+	-	BIOGRID
860307	2540394	2541652	276922	278148	SPBC2D10.09	SPAC24B11.06c	snr1	sty1	SPBC2D10.09	phh1|spc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
860311	2541652	2540394	278148	276922	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC2D10.09	sty1	snr1	phh1|spc1	SPBC2D10.09	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
860333	2541652	2541117	278148	277632	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC646.13	sty1	sds23	phh1|spc1	moc1|psp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jang YJ (2013)	23640764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
860334	2541652	2541117	278148	277632	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC646.13	sty1	sds23	phh1|spc1	moc1|psp1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Jang YJ (2013)	23640764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
860335	2541652	2540329	278148	276859	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC29B5.01	sty1	atf1	phh1|spc1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Biochemical Activity	physical	Jang YJ (2013)	23640764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
860336	2539781	2540329	276331	276859	SPBC106.10	SPBC29B5.01	pka1	atf1	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jang YJ (2013)	23640764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
860337	2539781	2540329	276331	276859	SPBC106.10	SPBC29B5.01	pka1	atf1	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Biochemical Activity	physical	Jang YJ (2013)	23640764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
860352	5111	2540020	111142	276564	-	SPBC16D10.09	PCNA	pcn1	ATLD2	pcn	Two-hybrid	physical	Warbrick E (1995)	7780738	9606	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
860353	37290	2540020	62946	276564	Dmel_CG9193	SPBC16D10.09	PCNA	pcn1	53/13|CG9193|DmPCNA|DmelCG9193|MUS209|PCNA/mus209|dPCNA|l(2)02448|l(2)56F|l(2)56Fa|l(2)s1534|mus 209	pcn	Two-hybrid	physical	Warbrick E (1995)	7780738	7227	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
860354	2540020	2540020	276564	276564	SPBC16D10.09	SPBC16D10.09	pcn1	pcn1	pcn	pcn	Two-hybrid	physical	Warbrick E (1995)	7780738	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
860356	2541652	2541055	278148	277570	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC409.07c	sty1	wis1	phh1|spc1	smf2|spc2	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860357	2542409	2543554	278873	279971	SPAC17G8.10c	SPAC4H3.11c	dma1	ppc89	-	mug127	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860358	2542409	2540537	278873	277064	SPAC17G8.10c	SPBC56F2.07c	dma1	SPBC56F2.07c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860359	2541713	2541735	278208	278229	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC7D4.04	atp11	atg11	-	taf1|cvt9	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860360	2542245	2543208	278715	279637	SPAC17A5.10	SPAC328.04	SPAC17A5.10	SPAC328.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860361	2540716	2541273	277239	277787	SPBC215.15	SPBC8D2.20c	sec13	sec31	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860362	2541652	2540329	278148	276859	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC29B5.01	sty1	atf1	phh1|spc1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860363	2541652	2540394	278148	276922	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC2D10.09	sty1	snr1	phh1|spc1	SPBC2D10.09	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860364	2541652	2541652	278148	278148	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC24B11.06c	sty1	sty1	phh1|spc1	phh1|spc1	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860365	2542667	2540586	279120	277112	SPAC26A3.16	SPBC27.01c	dph1	SPBC27.01c	ucp5	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860366	2541735	2539314	278229	275880	SPAC7D4.04	SPCC548.05c	atg11	dbl5	taf1|cvt9	SPCC548.05c	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860367	2542649	2543170	279103	279601	SPAC24C9.14	SPAC343.09	otu1	ubx3	mug141	mug39	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860368	2541585	2543575	278082	279990	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC644.13c	man1	SPAC644.13c	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860369	2542137	2542474	278613	278934	SPAC1D4.13	SPAC31G5.09c	byr1	spk1	ste1|ste3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860370	2542435	2542435	278897	278897	SPAC1805.16c	SPAC1805.16c	SPAC1805.16c	SPAC1805.16c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860371	2541934	2542698	278422	279151	SPAC222.11	SPAC26H5.09c	hem13	SPAC26H5.09c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860372	2542409	2541652	278873	278148	SPAC17G8.10c	SPAC24B11.06c	dma1	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860373	2542409	2539914	278873	276458	SPAC17G8.10c	SPBC12D12.01	dma1	sad1	-	SPBC16H5.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860374	2542409	2539726	278873	276278	SPAC17G8.10c	SPBC13E7.08c	dma1	leo1	-	SPBC13E7.08c	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860375	2541713	2543580	278208	279995	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC644.14c	atp11	rad51	-	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860376	2541617	2539426	278114	275991	SPAC27D7.04	SPCC962.03c	omt2	cut15	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860377	2541652	2539495	278148	276058	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC4F11.02	sty1	ptc1	phh1|spc1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860378	2542482	2539645	278942	276200	SPAP8A3.06	SPBC146.07	uaf2	prp2	SPAP8A3.06|ods2	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860379	2543580	2540584	279995	277110	SPAC644.14c	SPBC28F2.07	rad51	sfr1	rhp51	dds20|mug13	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860380	2541585	2540880	278082	277397	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC582.03	man1	cdc13	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860381	2541532	2543170	278032	279601	SPAC2C4.15c	SPAC343.09	ubx2	ubx3	ucp13	mug39	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860382	2542446	2539434	278907	275997	SPAC19A8.07c	SPCC757.09c	SPAC19A8.07c	rnc1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860383	2543580	2539838	279995	276387	SPAC644.14c	SPBC1347.10	rad51	cdc23	rhp51	mcm10	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860384	2543646	2540580	280060	277106	SPAC821.07c	SPBC19C2.05	moc3	ran1	-	pat1	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860385	2543382	2539497	279804	276060	SPAC890.02c	SPCC895.07	alp7	alp14	mia1	mtc1	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860386	2541617	2542094	278114	278571	SPAC27D7.04	SPAC29B12.06c	omt2	rcd1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860387	2542686	2539186	279139	275757	SPAC26A3.17c	SPCC16C4.13c	SPAC26A3.17c	rpl1201	SPAC8E11.11	rpl12-1|rpl12.1	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860388	2542831	2541901	279278	278391	SPAC20H4.08	SPAC2F7.02c	whi2	SPAC2F7.02c	SPAC20H4.08|SPAC145.02	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860389	2542725	2540409	279176	276937	SPAC3A12.10	SPBC2D10.11c	rpl2001	nap2	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860390	2540249	2538843	276781	275424	SPBC32F12.08c	SPCC162.08c	duo1	nup211	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860391	2541464	2542689	277966	279142	SPAC222.08c	SPAC29B12.04	SPAC222.08c	snz1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860392	2543351	2543351	279773	279773	SPAC8C9.03	SPAC8C9.03	cgs1	cgs1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860393	2541194	2541368	277708	277879	SPBC725.13c	SPBP4H10.21c	psf2	sld5	bsh3|dre13	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860394	2541585	2540959	278082	277475	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC365.12c	man1	ish1	heh2|mug61	isp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860395	2543086	2543086	279519	279519	SPAC30D11.10	SPAC30D11.10	rad52	rad52	rad22|rad22A	rad22|rad22A	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860396	2540422	2540422	276950	276950	SPBC27.08c	SPBC27.08c	sua1	sua1	SPBC28F2.01c|asp1|met3	SPBC28F2.01c|asp1|met3	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860397	2540537	2540537	277064	277064	SPBC56F2.07c	SPBC56F2.07c	SPBC56F2.07c	SPBC56F2.07c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860398	2541585	2542667	278082	279120	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC26A3.16	man1	dph1	heh2|mug61	ucp5	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860399	2543004	2541585	279442	278082	SPAC12B10.02c	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC12B10.02c	man1	-	heh2|mug61	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860400	2542311	2542489	278777	278948	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC589.08c	dad1	dam1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860401	2542245	2543646	278715	280060	SPAC17A5.10	SPAC821.07c	SPAC17A5.10	moc3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860402	2542409	2540350	278873	276879	SPAC17G8.10c	SPBC317.01	dma1	mbx2	-	pvg4	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860403	2541426	2543575	277931	279990	SPAC227.06	SPAC644.13c	SPAC227.06	SPAC644.13c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860404	2540725	2541147	277248	277662	SPBC215.14c	SPBC651.05c	vps20	dot2	-	vps22	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860405	2541735	2540951	278229	277467	SPAC7D4.04	SPBC3B8.11	atg11	rrn6	taf1|cvt9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860406	2541585	2539914	278082	276458	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC12D12.01	man1	sad1	heh2|mug61	SPBC16H5.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860407	2541677	2540612	278173	277138	SPAC1565.04c	SPBC1D7.05	ste4	byr2	-	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860408	2543011	2541771	279449	278265	SPAC10F6.11c	SPAC23H3.06	atg17	apl6	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860409	2541585	2539721	278082	276274	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC146.04	man1	SPBC146.04	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860410	2542409	2542733	278873	279183	SPAC17G8.10c	SPAC6F12.04	dma1	SPAC6F12.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860411	2541735	2539838	278229	276387	SPAC7D4.04	SPBC1347.10	atg11	cdc23	taf1|cvt9	mcm10	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860412	2541490	2541490	277992	277992	SPAP27G11.09c	SPAP27G11.09c	SPAP27G11.09c	SPAP27G11.09c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860413	2540880	2541159	277397	277674	SPBC582.03	SPBC685.09	cdc13	orc2	-	orp2	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860414	2543086	2543580	279519	279995	SPAC30D11.10	SPAC644.14c	rad52	rad51	rad22|rad22A	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860415	2541601	2540526	278098	277054	SPAC22F8.08	SPBC26H8.01	sec24	thi2	sfb2	nmt2	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860416	2541585	2540846	278082	277363	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC428.14	man1	SPBC428.14	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860417	3361532	2540019	280608	276563	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC1685.01	lkh1	pmp1	kic1	dsp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860418	2542245	2542245	278715	278715	SPAC17A5.10	SPAC17A5.10	SPAC17A5.10	SPAC17A5.10	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860419	2542245	2539686	278715	276241	SPAC17A5.10	SPBC1734.06	SPAC17A5.10	rhp18	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860420	2541713	3361526	278208	280602	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC664.15	atp11	caf4	-	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860421	2541532	2541532	278032	278032	SPAC2C4.15c	SPAC2C4.15c	ubx2	ubx2	ucp13	ucp13	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860422	2540394	2541142	276922	277657	SPBC2D10.09	SPBC725.04	snr1	SPBC725.04	SPBC2D10.09	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860423	2540409	2539299	276937	275867	SPBC2D10.11c	SPCC1672.07	nap2	SPCC1672.07	nap1.2|nap12	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860424	2541585	2542733	278082	279183	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC6F12.04	man1	SPAC6F12.04	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860425	2541735	2539958	278229	276502	SPAC7D4.04	SPBC1718.07c	atg11	zfs1	taf1|cvt9	moc4	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860426	2539642	2539047	276197	275620	SPBC1706.01	SPCC1223.06	tea4	tea1	wsh3	alp8	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860427	2543646	2540645	280060	277170	SPAC821.07c	SPBC21B10.05c	moc3	pop3	-	wat1	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860428	2539728	2540929	276280	277445	SPBC14F5.12c	SPBC354.03	cbh2	swd3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860429	2542433	2538932	278895	275508	SPAC17G6.14c	SPCC31H12.03c	uap56	tho1	-	SPCC31H12.03c	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860430	2542410	2542094	278874	278571	SPAC1834.11c	SPAC29B12.06c	sec18	rcd1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860431	2542701	2540249	279154	276781	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC32F12.08c	mga2	duo1	SPAC26H5.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860432	2541585	2541744	278082	278238	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC23A1.02c	man1	SPAC23A1.02c	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860433	2541585	2541834	278082	278325	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC824.08	man1	gda1	heh2|mug61	gdp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860434	2542042	2541112	278523	277627	SPAC23A1.14c	SPBC725.07	SPAC23A1.14c	pex5	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860435	2543580	2543580	279995	279995	SPAC644.14c	SPAC644.14c	rad51	rad51	rhp51	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860436	2540409	2540880	276937	277397	SPBC2D10.11c	SPBC582.03	nap2	cdc13	nap1.2|nap12	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860437	2543290	2543290	279715	279715	SPAC9E9.10c	SPAC9E9.10c	cbh1	cbh1	cbh	cbh	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860438	2539914	2540880	276458	277397	SPBC12D12.01	SPBC582.03	sad1	cdc13	SPBC16H5.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860439	2542042	2542042	278523	278523	SPAC23A1.14c	SPAC23A1.14c	SPAC23A1.14c	SPAC23A1.14c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860440	2542731	2542731	279181	279181	SPAC5H10.09c	SPAC5H10.09c	SPAC5H10.09c	SPAC5H10.09c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860441	2541735	2539666	278229	276221	SPAC7D4.04	SPBC16A3.11	atg11	eso1	taf1|cvt9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860442	2543580	2540249	279995	276781	SPAC644.14c	SPBC32F12.08c	rad51	duo1	rhp51	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860443	2542928	2541585	279369	278082	SPAC1142.06	SPAC14C4.05c	get3	man1	-	heh2|mug61	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860444	2541585	2542396	278082	278860	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC17G6.09	man1	sec62	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860445	2541585	5802965	278082	858103	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC11H11.06	man1	arp2	heh2|mug61	SPAC22F8.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860446	2541585	2543479	278082	279899	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC688.04c	man1	gst3	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860447	2542409	2543580	278873	279995	SPAC17G8.10c	SPAC644.14c	dma1	rad51	-	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860448	2542409	2540324	278873	276854	SPAC17G8.10c	SPBC29A3.16	dma1	rrs1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860449	2542137	2543646	278613	280060	SPAC1D4.13	SPAC821.07c	byr1	moc3	ste1|ste3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860450	2542137	2543290	278613	279715	SPAC1D4.13	SPAC9E9.10c	byr1	cbh1	ste1|ste3	cbh	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860451	2542137	2539728	278613	276280	SPAC1D4.13	SPBC14F5.12c	byr1	cbh2	ste1|ste3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860452	2542137	2540612	278613	277138	SPAC1D4.13	SPBC1D7.05	byr1	byr2	ste1|ste3	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860453	2542137	2540537	278613	277064	SPAC1D4.13	SPBC56F2.07c	byr1	SPBC56F2.07c	ste1|ste3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860454	2542649	2539945	279103	276489	SPAC24C9.14	SPBC119.05c	otu1	SPBC119.05c	mug141	csh3	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860455	2542689	2540070	279142	276608	SPAC29B12.04	SPBC119.04	snz1	mei3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860456	2543208	2540880	279637	277397	SPAC328.04	SPBC582.03	SPAC328.04	cdc13	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860457	2543170	2541050	279601	277565	SPAC343.09	SPBC428.05c	ubx3	arg12	mug39	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860458	2541713	2541709	278208	278204	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC3C7.02c	atp11	pil2	-	SPAC3C7.02c	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860459	2541713	2540409	278208	276937	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC2D10.11c	atp11	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860460	2541709	2539838	278204	276387	SPAC3C7.02c	SPBC1347.10	pil2	cdc23	SPAC3C7.02c	mcm10	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860461	2541709	2540249	278204	276781	SPAC3C7.02c	SPBC32F12.08c	pil2	duo1	SPAC3C7.02c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860462	2543554	2540880	279971	277397	SPAC4H3.11c	SPBC582.03	ppc89	cdc13	mug127	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860463	2543580	2540070	279995	276608	SPAC644.14c	SPBC119.04	rad51	mei3	rhp51	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860464	2543580	2540394	279995	276922	SPAC644.14c	SPBC2D10.09	rad51	snr1	rhp51	SPBC2D10.09	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860465	2543580	2540350	279995	276879	SPAC644.14c	SPBC317.01	rad51	mbx2	rhp51	pvg4	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860466	2541735	2538787	278229	275368	SPAC7D4.04	SPCC364.02c	atg11	bis1	taf1|cvt9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860467	2543646	2543290	280060	279715	SPAC821.07c	SPAC9E9.10c	moc3	cbh1	-	cbh	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860468	2542102	2542102	278578	278578	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC8C9.17c	spc34	spc34	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860469	2542873	2542873	279318	279318	SPAC9G1.02	SPAC9G1.02	wis4	wis4	wak1|wik1	wak1|wik1	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860470	3361526	2540775	280602	277295	SPAC664.15	SPBC19G7.15	caf4	nup44	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860471	3361526	2541214	280602	277728	SPAC664.15	SPBC839.07	caf4	ibp1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860472	2539668	2538752	276223	275335	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC830.11c	pht1	fap7	pi001	SPCC830.11c	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860473	2540563	2539495	277090	276058	SPBC25H2.09	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC25H2.09	ptc1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860474	2540324	2539495	276854	276058	SPBC29A3.16	SPCC4F11.02	rrs1	ptc1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860475	2540409	2540249	276937	276781	SPBC2D10.11c	SPBC32F12.08c	nap2	duo1	nap1.2|nap12	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860476	2540350	2540249	276879	276781	SPBC317.01	SPBC32F12.08c	mbx2	duo1	pvg4	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860477	2540977	2540919	277493	277435	SPBC3E7.02c	SPBC543.07	hsp16	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860478	2540409	2540409	276937	276937	SPBC2D10.11c	SPBC2D10.11c	nap2	nap2	nap1.2|nap12	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860479	2542542	2540618	278999	277144	SPAC19A8.10	SPBC3D6.11c	rfp1	slx8	mug140	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860480	2541735	2541214	278229	277728	SPAC7D4.04	SPBC839.07	atg11	ibp1	taf1|cvt9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860481	2539434	2539434	275997	275997	SPCC757.09c	SPCC757.09c	rnc1	rnc1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860482	2538718	2538718	275302	275302	SPCC4B3.06c	SPCC4B3.06c	SPCC4B3.06c	SPCC4B3.06c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860483	2540409	2539277	276937	275845	SPBC2D10.11c	SPCC663.04	nap2	rpl39	nap1.2|nap12	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860484	2542689	2542689	279142	279142	SPAC29B12.04	SPAC29B12.04	snz1	snz1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860485	2539943	2539943	276487	276487	SPBC14F5.05c	SPBC14F5.05c	sam1	sam1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860486	2538768	2538768	275351	275351	SPCC330.05c	SPCC330.05c	ura4	ura4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860487	2542470	2542470	278931	278931	SPAC19G12.04	SPAC19G12.04	dal1	dal1	SPAC19G12.04	SPAC19G12.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860488	2540079	2539017	276617	275590	SPBC13G1.03c	SPCC338.13	pex14	cog4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860489	2540880	2539149	277397	275721	SPBC582.03	SPCC1739.11c	cdc13	cdc11	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860490	2540402	2540402	276930	276930	SPBC30D10.05c	SPBC30D10.05c	SPBC30D10.05c	SPBC30D10.05c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860491	2543580	2540727	279995	277250	SPAC644.14c	SPBC1921.03c	rad51	mex67	rhp51	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860492	2543260	2543260	279688	279688	SPAC1002.17c	SPAC1002.17c	urg2	urg2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860493	2542928	2542124	279369	278600	SPAC1142.06	SPAC19A8.14	get3	SPAC19A8.14	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860494	2542667	2542667	279120	279120	SPAC26A3.16	SPAC26A3.16	dph1	dph1	ucp5	ucp5	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860495	2541735	2540249	278229	276781	SPAC7D4.04	SPBC32F12.08c	atg11	duo1	taf1|cvt9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860496	2541585	2542969	278082	279409	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC4G8.10	man1	gos1	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860497	2541585	2540054	278082	276592	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC119.09c	man1	SPBC119.09c	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860498	2542224	2542224	278697	278697	SPAC19G12.03	SPAC19G12.03	cda1	cda1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860499	2542007	2543086	278490	279519	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC30D11.10	rad57	rad52	rhp57|SPAC145.01	rad22|rad22A	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860500	2540817	2538752	277335	275335	SPAC3H5.05c	SPCC830.11c	rps1401	fap7	rps14|rps14-1	SPCC830.11c	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860501	2543055	2543055	279489	279489	SPAC806.06c	SPAC806.06c	SPAC806.06c	SPAC806.06c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860502	2539919	2539919	276463	276463	SPBC12C2.07c	SPBC12C2.07c	srm1	srm1	SPBC12C2.07c	SPBC12C2.07c	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860503	2541050	2541050	277565	277565	SPBC428.05c	SPBC428.05c	arg12	arg12	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860504	2539237	2539495	275807	276058	SPCC24B10.13	SPCC4F11.02	skb5	ptc1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860505	2541735	2539495	278229	276058	SPAC7D4.04	SPCC4F11.02	atg11	ptc1	taf1|cvt9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860506	3361466	3361466	280542	280542	SPAC959.10	SPAC959.10	sen15	sen15	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860507	2539985	2539985	276529	276529	SPBC14F5.09c	SPBC14F5.09c	ade8	ade8	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860508	2543044	2539857	279479	276404	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC1604.20c	tip1	tea2	noc1	klp4	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860509	2540625	2540625	277151	277151	SPBC21C3.10c	SPBC21C3.10c	SPBC21C3.10c	SPBC21C3.10c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860510	2543111	2543111	279543	279543	SPAC806.07	SPAC806.07	ndk1	ndk1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860511	2538851	2538885	275432	275463	SPCC18.07	SPCC330.13	rpc53	rpc37	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860512	2542396	2539914	278860	276458	SPAC17G6.09	SPBC12D12.01	sec62	sad1	-	SPBC16H5.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860513	2543580	2540580	279995	277106	SPAC644.14c	SPBC19C2.05	rad51	ran1	rhp51	pat1	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860514	2542410	2542410	278874	278874	SPAC1834.11c	SPAC1834.11c	sec18	sec18	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860515	2542875	2540288	279320	276819	SPAC13G7.02c	SPBC3B9.01	ssa1	fes1	-	SPBC3B9.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860516	2542200	2541652	278675	278148	SPAC19D5.01	SPAC24B11.06c	pyp2	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860517	2541507	2540395	278009	276923	SPAC23D3.06c	SPBC31E1.05	nup146	gle1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860518	2541617	2541617	278114	278114	SPAC27D7.04	SPAC27D7.04	omt2	omt2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860519	2541178	2539117	277692	275689	SPBC725.02	SPCC74.06	mpr1	mak3	spy1	phk2	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860520	2542928	2540862	279369	277379	SPAC1142.06	SPBC4C3.06	get3	syp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860521	2543290	2540394	279715	276922	SPAC9E9.10c	SPBC2D10.09	cbh1	snr1	cbh	SPBC2D10.09	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860522	2539686	2539686	276241	276241	SPBC1734.06	SPBC1734.06	rhp18	rhp18	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860523	2543646	2543646	280060	280060	SPAC821.07c	SPAC821.07c	moc3	moc3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860524	3361526	2540954	280602	277470	SPAC664.15	SPBC337.13c	caf4	gtr1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860525	2543460	2540409	279880	276937	SPAC3H5.10	SPBC2D10.11c	rpl3202	nap2	rpl32|rpl32-2	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860526	2541996	2541081	278480	277596	SPAC23A1.15c	SPBC691.02c	sec20	drp1	-	SPBC691.02c|pi034|SPACTOKYO_453.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860527	2540328	2539149	276858	275721	SPBC31F10.11c	SPCC1739.11c	cwf4	cdc11	syf3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860528	2541500	2541112	278002	277627	SPAC227.18	SPBC725.07	lys3	pex5	SPAC2F7.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860529	2543198	2543198	279627	279627	SPAC31A2.11c	SPAC31A2.11c	cuf1	cuf1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860530	2542090	3361526	278567	280602	SPAC25G10.08	SPAC664.15	SPAC25G10.08	caf4	p116	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860531	2543336	2543336	279759	279759	SPAC688.11	SPAC688.11	end4	end4	sla2	sla2	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860532	2540929	2541159	277445	277674	SPBC354.03	SPBC685.09	swd3	orc2	-	orp2	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860533	2542250	2540150	278720	276687	SPAC17D4.03c	SPBC16E9.14c	cis4	zrg17	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860534	2541513	2540409	278014	276937	SPAC227.13c	SPBC2D10.11c	isu1	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860535	2540992	2539495	277508	276058	SPBC342.05	SPCC4F11.02	crb2	ptc1	rhp9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860536	2539914	2539914	276458	276458	SPBC12D12.01	SPBC12D12.01	sad1	sad1	SPBC16H5.01c	SPBC16H5.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860537	2542873	2541209	279318	277723	SPAC9G1.02	SPBC887.10	wis4	mcs4	wak1|wik1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860538	2538843	2538787	275424	275368	SPCC162.08c	SPCC364.02c	nup211	bis1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860539	2540119	2540119	276656	276656	SPBC1773.05c	SPBC1773.05c	tms1	tms1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860540	2540526	2540526	277054	277054	SPBC26H8.01	SPBC26H8.01	thi2	thi2	nmt2	nmt2	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860541	3361358	3361358	280434	280434	SPBC3F6.03	SPBC3F6.03	trr1	trr1	caf4	caf4	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860542	2541055	2541178	277570	277692	SPBC409.07c	SPBC725.02	wis1	mpr1	smf2|spc2	spy1	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860543	2540753	2538787	277274	275368	SPBC211.02c	SPCC364.02c	cwf3	bis1	syf1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860544	2541209	2541209	277723	277723	SPBC887.10	SPBC887.10	mcs4	mcs4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860545	2538736	2539219	275320	275789	SPCC1322.12c	SPCC1795.01c	bub1	mad3	-	SPCC895.02	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860546	2539410	2539410	275975	275975	SPCC4G3.17	SPCC4G3.17	SPCC4G3.17	SPCC4G3.17	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860547	2543506	2539428	279924	275993	SPAC637.12c	SPCC830.05c	mst1	epl1	kat5	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860548	2543044	2539047	279479	275620	SPAC3C7.12	SPCC1223.06	tip1	tea1	noc1	alp8	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860549	2541585	2541110	278082	277625	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC646.05c	man1	erg9	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860550	2540051	2540051	276589	276589	SPBC32H8.12c	SPBC32H8.12c	act1	act1	cps8|pi012	cps8|pi012	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860551	2541874	2541874	278364	278364	SPAC1F8.07c	SPAC1F8.07c	SPAC1F8.07c	SPAC1F8.07c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860552	2541513	2538843	278014	275424	SPAC227.13c	SPCC162.08c	isu1	nup211	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860553	2540992	2540880	277508	277397	SPBC342.05	SPBC582.03	crb2	cdc13	rhp9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860554	2538736	2538736	275320	275320	SPCC1322.12c	SPCC1322.12c	bub1	bub1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860555	2540977	2540977	277493	277493	SPBC3E7.02c	SPBC3E7.02c	hsp16	hsp16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860556	2542667	2543044	279120	279479	SPAC26A3.16	SPAC3C7.12	dph1	tip1	ucp5	noc1	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860557	2539668	2540409	276223	276937	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC2D10.11c	pht1	nap2	pi001	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860558	2543646	2540880	280060	277397	SPAC821.07c	SPBC582.03	moc3	cdc13	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860559	2539838	2540784	276387	277303	SPBC1347.10	SPBC211.04c	cdc23	mcm6	mcm10	mis5	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860560	2543581	2540409	279996	276937	SPAPB1E7.12	SPBC2D10.11c	rps602	nap2	rps6|rps6-2	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860561	2541735	2541735	278229	278229	SPAC7D4.04	SPAC7D4.04	atg11	atg11	taf1|cvt9	taf1|cvt9	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860562	2540350	2540929	276879	277445	SPBC317.01	SPBC354.03	mbx2	swd3	pvg4	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860563	2542749	2543580	279199	279995	SPAC15A10.03c	SPAC644.14c	rad54	rad51	rhp54	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860564	2542080	2540580	278557	277106	SPAC27D7.03c	SPBC19C2.05	mei2	ran1	-	pat1	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860565	2543208	2543208	279637	279637	SPAC328.04	SPAC328.04	SPAC328.04	SPAC328.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860566	2541710	2543506	278205	279924	SPAC343.11c	SPAC637.12c	msc1	mst1	-	kat5	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860567	2542489	2542102	278948	278578	SPAC589.08c	SPAC8C9.17c	dam1	spc34	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860568	2542489	2540249	278948	276781	SPAC589.08c	SPBC32F12.08c	dam1	duo1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860569	2542873	2541178	279318	277692	SPAC9G1.02	SPBC725.02	wis4	mpr1	wak1|wik1	spy1	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860570	2539971	2539971	276515	276515	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC1105.04c	cbp1	cbp1	abp1	abp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860571	2540070	2540580	276608	277106	SPBC119.04	SPBC19C2.05	mei3	ran1	-	pat1	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860572	2539644	2540578	276199	277104	SPBC16E9.01c	SPBC26H8.06	php4	grx4	SPBP16F5.09c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860573	2541178	2541209	277692	277723	SPBC725.02	SPBC887.10	mpr1	mcs4	spy1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860574	2540821	2540821	277339	277339	SPBC800.03	SPBC800.03	clr3	clr3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860575	2539149	2539149	275721	275721	SPCC1739.11c	SPCC1739.11c	cdc11	cdc11	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860576	2541512	2540911	278013	277427	SPAC11E3.08c	SPBC651.10	nse6	nse5	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860577	2541513	2543580	278014	279995	SPAC227.13c	SPAC644.14c	isu1	rad51	-	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860578	2543208	2541709	279637	278204	SPAC328.04	SPAC3C7.02c	SPAC328.04	pil2	-	SPAC3C7.02c	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860579	2543580	2540880	279995	277397	SPAC644.14c	SPBC582.03	rad51	cdc13	rhp51	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860580	2539047	2539487	275620	276050	SPCC1223.06	SPCC895.05	tea1	for3	alp8	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860581	2542253	2543646	278723	280060	SPAC17H9.04c	SPAC821.07c	SPAC17H9.04c	moc3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860582	2539838	2538843	276387	275424	SPBC1347.10	SPCC162.08c	cdc23	nup211	mcm10	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860583	2542410	2541513	278874	278014	SPAC1834.11c	SPAC227.13c	sec18	isu1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860584	2542433	2542433	278895	278895	SPAC17G6.14c	SPAC17G6.14c	uap56	uap56	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860585	2541464	2541464	277966	277966	SPAC222.08c	SPAC222.08c	SPAC222.08c	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860586	2539728	2539728	276280	276280	SPBC14F5.12c	SPBC14F5.12c	cbh2	cbh2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860587	2542542	2539686	278999	276241	SPAC19A8.10	SPBC1734.06	rfp1	rhp18	mug140	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860588	2543086	2543685	279519	280099	SPAC30D11.10	SPAC3C7.03c	rad52	rad55	rad22|rad22A	rhp55	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860589	2540540	2540540	277067	277067	SPBC23E6.10c	SPBC23E6.10c	SPBC23E6.10c	SPBC23E6.10c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860590	2542175	2540919	278650	277435	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC543.07	mkh1	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Two-hybrid	physical	Das J (2013)	23695164	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	high-confidence interaction: Interaction confirmed using three techniques: yeast two-hybrid, protein complementation assay with YFP in HEK293T cells, and well-based nucleic acid programmable protein array	-	BIOGRID
860617	2541861	2540043	278351	276581	SPAC5D6.08c	SPBC1198.12	mes1	mfr1	-	SPBC660.02|fzr1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Aoi Y (2013)	23628763	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:partial rescue	fzr1 mutant suppresses early meiosis termination of mes1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
860618	2541861	2539483	278351	276046	SPAC5D6.08c	SPCC584.02	mes1	cuf2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Aoi Y (2013)	23628763	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:partial rescue	cuf2 mutant suppresses early meiosis termination of mes1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
860619	2543044	2542123	279479	278599	SPAC3C7.12	SPAC18G6.15	tip1	mal3	noc1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Hoeoeg JL (2013)	23613905	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution:partial rescue|spindle morphology:partial rescue	MAL3 deletion partially suppresses defect in MT bundle anchoring in tip1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
860620	2542546	2543260	279003	279688	SPAC1399.05c	SPAC1002.17c	toe1	urg2	SPAC1399.05c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Vachon L (2013)	23695302	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:undetermined	urg2 deletion suppresses cell elongation seen in toe1 overexpression strain	-	BIOGRID
860621	2542546	2542614	279003	279068	SPAC1399.05c	SPAC1399.04c	toe1	SPAC1399.04c	SPAC1399.05c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Vachon L (2013)	23695302	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:undetermined	SPAC1399.04c deletion suppresses cell elongation seen in toe1 overexpression strain	-	BIOGRID
860622	2541956	2541036	278443	277551	SPAC139.03	SPBC3H7.05c	toe2	SPBC3H7.05c	SPAC139.03	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Vachon L (2013)	23695302	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:undetermined	SPBC3H7.05c deletion suppresses septal deposition defect seen in toe2 overexpression strain	-	BIOGRID
860623	2541956	2543066	278443	279499	SPAC139.03	SPAC343.12	toe2	rds1	SPAC139.03	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Vachon L (2013)	23695302	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:undetermined	rds1 deletion suppresses septal deposition defect seen in toe2 overexpression strain	-	BIOGRID
860624	2541956	2542612	278443	279066	SPAC139.03	SPACUNK4.15	toe2	SPACUNK4.15	SPAC139.03	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Vachon L (2013)	23695302	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:undetermined	SPACUNK4.15 deletion suppresses septal deposition defect seen in toe2 overexpression strain	-	BIOGRID
860696	2540099	2543666	276637	280080	SPBC16H5.11c	SPAC644.06c	skb1	cdr1	rmt5	nim1	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
860702	2541699	2543129	278195	279561	SPAP8A3.08	SPAC4F8.13c	cdc4	rng2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tebbs IR (2013)	23615450	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	cdc4-8 and mEGFP-rng2deltaIQ alleles in a rng2-D5 mutant background	-	BIOGRID
860703	2541372	2540825	277883	277343	SPBP8B7.28c	SPBC428.08c	stc1	clr4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	He C (2013)	23613586	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
860704	2541372	2539050	277883	275623	SPBP8B7.28c	SPCC11E10.08	stc1	rik1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	He C (2013)	23613586	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
860705	2541372	2538848	277883	275429	SPBP8B7.28c	SPCC613.12c	stc1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	He C (2013)	23613586	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
860706	2541372	2539420	277883	275985	SPBP8B7.28c	SPCC970.07c	stc1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	He C (2013)	23613586	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
860974	2541731	2539377	278225	275943	SPAC6G9.11	SPCC825.03c	syb1	psy1	snc1	sso1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yamaoka T (2013)	23709180	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	overexpression suppresses the reduction in spore size in the syb1-S1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
860975	2541731	2540623	278225	277149	SPAC6G9.11	SPBC26H8.02c	syb1	sec9	snc1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yamaoka T (2013)	23709180	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	overexpression suppresses the reduction in spore size in the syb1-S1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
860976	2541731	2540623	278225	277149	SPAC6G9.11	SPBC26H8.02c	syb1	sec9	snc1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yamaoka T (2013)	23709180	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	overexpression suppresses the temperature sensitive growth of the syb1-S1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
860977	2540473	2540032	277001	276575	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC1703.14c	tor1	top1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Schonbrun M (2013)	23703609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	sensitivity to DNA-damaging agent camptothecin (CHEBI:27656) rescued	-	BIOGRID
860978	2539206	2540032	275776	276575	SPCC24B10.07	SPBC1703.14c	gad8	top1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Schonbrun M (2013)	23703609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	sensitivity to DNA-damaging agent camptothecin (CHEBI:27656) rescued	-	BIOGRID
860979	2540719	2540032	277242	276575	SPBC216.05	SPBC1703.14c	rad3	top1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Schonbrun M (2013)	23703609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	sensitivity to DNA-damaging agent camptothecin (CHEBI:27656) rescued	-	BIOGRID
860980	2541071	2539845	277586	276393	SPBC582.05c	SPBC12C2.02c	brc1	ste20	-	ste16	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Schonbrun M (2013)	23703609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|resistance to chemicals	lethality in the presence of camptothecin (CHEBI:27656) or MMS (CHEBI:25255)	-	BIOGRID
860981	2541071	2539206	277586	275776	SPBC582.05c	SPCC24B10.07	brc1	gad8	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Schonbrun M (2013)	23703609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|resistance to chemicals	lethality in the presence of camptothecin (CHEBI:27656) or MMS (CHEBI:25255)	-	BIOGRID
860982	2540473	2539087	277001	275659	SPBC30D10.10c	SPCC1259.13	tor1	chk1	-	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Schonbrun M (2013)	23703609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	sensitivity to prolonged exposure to camptothecin (CHEBI:27656), HU (CHEBI:44423), or MMS (CHEBI:25255)	-	BIOGRID
860983	2540473	2538959	277001	275533	SPBC30D10.10c	SPCC18B5.11c	tor1	cds1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Schonbrun M (2013)	23703609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	sensitivity to prolonged exposure to camptothecin (CHEBI:27656), HU (CHEBI:44423), or MMS (CHEBI:25255)	-	BIOGRID
860984	2540473	2543240	277001	279668	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC694.06c	tor1	mrc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Schonbrun M (2013)	23703609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	sensitivity to prolonged exposure to camptothecin (CHEBI:27656), HU (CHEBI:44423), or MMS (CHEBI:25255)	-	BIOGRID
860985	2540473	2540728	277001	277251	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC216.06c	tor1	swi1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Schonbrun M (2013)	23703609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	sensitivity to prolonged exposure to camptothecin (CHEBI:27656), HU (CHEBI:44423), or MMS (CHEBI:25255)	-	BIOGRID
860986	2540473	3361323	277001	280399	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC30D10.04	tor1	swi3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Schonbrun M (2013)	23703609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	sensitivity to prolonged exposure to camptothecin (CHEBI:27656), HU (CHEBI:44423), or MMS (CHEBI:25255)	-	BIOGRID
860987	2540473	2541620	277001	278117	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC2G11.12	tor1	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Schonbrun M (2013)	23703609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	sensitivity to prolonged exposure to camptothecin (CHEBI:27656), HU (CHEBI:44423), or MMS (CHEBI:25255)	-	BIOGRID
860988	2540473	2543086	277001	279519	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC30D11.10	tor1	rad52	-	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Schonbrun M (2013)	23703609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
860989	2540473	2543580	277001	279995	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC644.14c	tor1	rad51	-	rhp51	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Schonbrun M (2013)	23703609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
860990	2540473	2539004	277001	275578	SPBC30D10.10c	SPCC4G3.05c	tor1	mus81	-	slx3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Schonbrun M (2013)	23703609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	strong sensitivity to prolonged exposure to camptothecin (CHEBI:27656), HU (CHEBI:44423), or MMS (CHEBI:25255)	-	BIOGRID
860991	2540473	2543633	277001	280047	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC3H8.05c	tor1	mms1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Schonbrun M (2013)	23703609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	strong sensitivity to prolonged exposure to camptothecin (CHEBI:27656), HU (CHEBI:44423), or MMS (CHEBI:25255)	-	BIOGRID
860992	2540473	2543237	277001	279665	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC6B12.02c	tor1	mus7	-	mms22	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Schonbrun M (2013)	23703609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	strong sensitivity to prolonged exposure to camptothecin (CHEBI:27656), HU (CHEBI:44423), or MMS (CHEBI:25255)	-	BIOGRID
860993	2540473	2541071	277001	277586	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC582.05c	tor1	brc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Schonbrun M (2013)	23703609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	strong sensitivity to prolonged exposure to camptothecin (CHEBI:27656), HU (CHEBI:44423), or MMS (CHEBI:25255)	-	BIOGRID
861004	2539845	2543086	276393	279519	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC30D11.10	ste20	rad52	ste16	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Schonbrun M (2013)	23703609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
861005	2539845	2543580	276393	279995	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC644.14c	ste20	rad51	ste16	rhp51	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Schonbrun M (2013)	23703609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
861006	2539206	2543580	275776	279995	SPCC24B10.07	SPAC644.14c	gad8	rad51	-	rhp51	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Schonbrun M (2013)	23703609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
861007	2539206	2543086	275776	279519	SPCC24B10.07	SPAC30D11.10	gad8	rad52	-	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Schonbrun M (2013)	23703609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
861087	2541372	2539403	277883	275968	SPBP8B7.28c	SPCC736.11	stc1	ago1	-	csp9	Reconstituted Complex	physical	He C (2013)	23613586	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
862499	2540099	2539123	276637	275695	SPBC16H5.11c	SPCC18B5.03	skb1	wee1	rmt5	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
862500	2540099	2543441	276637	279861	SPBC16H5.11c	SPAC821.12	skb1	orb6	rmt5	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
862501	2540099	2540099	276637	276637	SPBC16H5.11c	SPBC16H5.11c	skb1	skb1	rmt5	rmt5	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
862502	2540099	2543666	276637	280080	SPBC16H5.11c	SPAC644.06c	skb1	cdr1	rmt5	nim1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
862503	2540099	2539123	276637	275695	SPBC16H5.11c	SPCC18B5.03	skb1	wee1	rmt5	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
862504	2542632	2540099	279086	276637	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC16H5.11c	cdc25	skb1	sal2	rmt5	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:partial rescue	skb1 delete partially suppresses size phenotype of cdc25-22 mutant	-	BIOGRID
862505	2543666	2540099	280080	276637	SPAC644.06c	SPBC16H5.11c	cdr1	skb1	nim1	rmt5	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:wild type	SKB1 overexpression suppresses wee (small cell size) phenotype caused by increased Cdr1 levels	-	BIOGRID
862506	2540099	2539123	276637	275695	SPBC16H5.11c	SPCC18B5.03	skb1	wee1	rmt5	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:wild type	WEE1 deletion suppresses elongated cell phenotype in SKB1 overexpressing mutant	-	BIOGRID
862507	2540468	2540099	276996	276637	SPBC23G7.04c	SPBC16H5.11c	nif1	skb1	-	rmt5	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	nif1 skb1 double mutant has enhanced decrease in cell size (cdc25-22 background)	-	BIOGRID
862508	2542632	2540468	279086	276996	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC23G7.04c	cdc25	nif1	sal2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	NIF1 delete suppresses growth defect of cdc25-22 mutant	-	BIOGRID
862509	2542632	2540099	279086	276637	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC16H5.11c	cdc25	skb1	sal2	rmt5	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	SKB1 delete suppresses growth defect of cdc25-22 mutant	-	BIOGRID
862510	2540468	2540099	276996	276637	SPBC23G7.04c	SPBC16H5.11c	nif1	skb1	-	rmt5	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	cdc25-22 background	-	BIOGRID
862511	2539423	3361342	275988	280418	SPCC663.12	SPBC16D10.07c	cid12	sir2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Buscaino A (2013)	23572080	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance|silencing	cid12-ha mutants show a synergistic loss of herterochromatin integrity when combined with sir2 or clr3	-	BIOGRID
862512	2539423	2540821	275988	277339	SPCC663.12	SPBC800.03	cid12	clr3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Buscaino A (2013)	23572080	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance|silencing	cid12-ha mutants show a synergistic loss of herterochromatin integrity when combined with sir2 or clr3	-	BIOGRID
862513	2538930	3361342	275506	280418	SPCC188.13c	SPBC16D10.07c	dcr1	sir2	SPCC584.10c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buscaino A (2013)	23572080	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to TBZ CID: 5430 CHEBI: 45979	-	BIOGRID
862514	2538930	2540821	275506	277339	SPCC188.13c	SPBC800.03	dcr1	clr3	SPCC584.10c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buscaino A (2013)	23572080	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to TBZ CID: 5430 CHEBI: 45979	-	BIOGRID
862515	2538930	2541633	275506	278129	SPCC188.13c	SPAC664.01c	dcr1	swi6	SPCC584.10c	SPAC824.10c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buscaino A (2013)	23572080	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to TBZ CID: 5430 CHEBI: 45979	-	BIOGRID
862516	2538930	3361342	275506	280418	SPCC188.13c	SPBC16D10.07c	dcr1	sir2	SPCC584.10c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Buscaino A (2013)	23572080	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance|silencing	double mutants show a loss of heterochromatin silencing	-	BIOGRID
862517	2538930	2541633	275506	278129	SPCC188.13c	SPAC664.01c	dcr1	swi6	SPCC584.10c	SPAC824.10c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Buscaino A (2013)	23572080	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance|silencing	double mutants show a loss of heterochromatin silencing	-	BIOGRID
862518	3361342	2540821	280418	277339	SPBC16D10.07c	SPBC800.03	sir2	clr3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buscaino A (2013)	23572080	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to TBZ CID: 5430 CHEBI: 45979	-	BIOGRID
862519	3361342	2540821	280418	277339	SPBC16D10.07c	SPBC800.03	sir2	clr3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Buscaino A (2013)	23572080	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance|silencing	double mutants show a loss of heterochromatin silencing	-	BIOGRID
862520	2538930	3361342	275506	280418	SPCC188.13c	SPBC16D10.07c	dcr1	sir2	SPCC584.10c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Buscaino A (2013)	23572080	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	in dcr1 null cells, the presence of functional TetRoff-Sir2 allows silencing	-	BIOGRID
863578	2541620	2539087	278117	275659	SPAC2G11.12	SPCC1259.13	rqh1	chk1	hus2|rad12|rec9	rad27	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Dehe PM (2013)	23584455	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification:wild type	deletion of chk1 reduces the constitutive phosphorylation of Eme1 seen in an rqh1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
863598	2541620	2543670	278117	280084	SPAC2G11.12	SPAPB1E7.06c	rqh1	eme1	hus2|rad12|rec9	mms4|slx2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dehe PM (2013)	23584455	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to CPT Chebi: 27656 and decreased chromosome stability	-	BIOGRID
863605	2543539	2543539	279956	279956	SPAC926.04c	SPAC926.04c	hsp90	hsp90	git10|swo1	git10|swo1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ishida M (2013)	23664927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	dimer	-	BIOGRID
863606	2543539	2539474	279956	276037	SPAC926.04c	SPCC645.14c	hsp90	sti1	git10|swo1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ishida M (2013)	23664927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	dimer	-	BIOGRID
863607	2543539	2539806	279956	276356	SPAC926.04c	SPBC1711.08	hsp90	aha1	git10|swo1	SPBC1711.08	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ishida M (2013)	23664927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	dimer	-	BIOGRID
863615	2540051	2543526	276589	279944	SPBC32H8.12c	SPAC4A8.15c	act1	cdc3	cps8|pi012	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Subramanian D (2013)	23589458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
863616	2540051	2541940	276589	278427	SPBC32H8.12c	SPAC27F1.02c	act1	cdc8	cps8|pi012	fus4	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Subramanian D (2013)	23589458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
863617	2540051	2539513	276589	276075	SPBC32H8.12c	SPCC645.05c	act1	myo2	cps8|pi012	rng5	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Subramanian D (2013)	23589458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
863618	2540051	2541699	276589	278195	SPBC32H8.12c	SPAP8A3.08	act1	cdc4	cps8|pi012	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Subramanian D (2013)	23589458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
863619	2540051	2541603	276589	278100	SPBC32H8.12c	SPAC1F5.04c	act1	cdc12	cps8|pi012	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Subramanian D (2013)	23589458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
863620	2540051	2543526	276589	279944	SPBC32H8.12c	SPAC4A8.15c	act1	cdc3	cps8|pi012	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Subramanian D (2013)	23589458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
863621	2540051	2539513	276589	276075	SPBC32H8.12c	SPCC645.05c	act1	myo2	cps8|pi012	rng5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Subramanian D (2013)	23589458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
863622	2540051	2541699	276589	278195	SPBC32H8.12c	SPAP8A3.08	act1	cdc4	cps8|pi012	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Subramanian D (2013)	23589458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
863624	2540051	2541940	276589	278427	SPBC32H8.12c	SPAC27F1.02c	act1	cdc8	cps8|pi012	fus4	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Subramanian D (2013)	23589458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
868675	2539920	2540024	276464	276568	SPBC119.08	SPBP4H10.04	pmk1	ppb1	spm1	SPBC1346.01c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Zhou X (2013)	23738021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	ppb1 deletion partially rescued growth of pmk1 mutant on micafungin (CHEBI 600520)	-	BIOGRID
869030	2541738	5802955	278232	858093	SPAC20G4.06c	SPAC25G10.09c	adf1	pan1	cof1	SPAC27F1.01c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chen Q (2013)	23727096	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	adf1-M2 pan1-deltaw	-	BIOGRID
869031	5802955	2543336	858093	279759	SPAC25G10.09c	SPAC688.11	pan1	end4	SPAC27F1.01c	sla2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chen Q (2013)	23727096	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	pan1-delta(w) end4-delta(tld)	-	BIOGRID
870062	2541568	2542327	278065	278793	SPAC11D3.09	SPAC16C9.06c	SPAC11D3.09	upf1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Matia-Gonzalez AM (2013)	23619768	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	After 48 h incubations, we observed that the|lower than the sensitivity shown by the upf1D strain, while all|peroxide treatment.|sensitivity of three of the double upf1D mutants tested, rex2D|single mutants displayed a wild-type phenotype under hydrogen|upf1D, SPAC11D3.09cD upf1D and SPCC63.13D upf1D, was	-	BIOGRID
870063	2539451	2542327	276014	278793	SPCC63.13	SPAC16C9.06c	SPCC63.13	upf1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Matia-Gonzalez AM (2013)	23619768	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	After 48 h incubations, we observed that the|lower than the sensitivity shown by the upf1D strain, while all|peroxide treatment.|sensitivity of three of the double upf1D mutants tested, rex2D|single mutants displayed a wild-type phenotype under hydrogen|upf1D, SPAC11D3.09cD upf1D and SPCC63.13D upf1D, was	-	BIOGRID
870064	2539853	2542327	276401	278793	SPBC1347.07	SPAC16C9.06c	rex2	upf1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Matia-Gonzalez AM (2013)	23619768	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	After 48 h incubations, we observed that the|lower than the sensitivity shown by the upf1D strain, while all|peroxide treatment.|sensitivity of three of the double upf1D mutants tested, rex2D|single mutants displayed a wild-type phenotype under hydrogen|upf1D, SPAC11D3.09cD upf1D and SPCC63.13D upf1D, was	-	BIOGRID
870065	2542884	2541251	279329	277765	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC947.10	dsc2	dsc1	ucp14	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lloyd SJ (2013)	23760507	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870066	2542884	2541990	279329	278474	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC20H4.02	dsc2	dsc3	ucp14	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lloyd SJ (2013)	23760507	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	deletion of dsc4 prevents pull down of dsc3 by dsc2	-	BIOGRID
870067	2542884	2543396	279329	279818	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC4D7.11	dsc2	dsc4	ucp14	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lloyd SJ (2013)	23760507	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870068	2542884	2539260	279329	275830	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC285.11	dsc2	dsc5	ucp14	ucp10	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lloyd SJ (2013)	23760507	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870069	2539260	2541251	275830	277765	SPCC285.11	SPBC947.10	dsc5	dsc1	ucp10	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lloyd SJ (2013)	23760507	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	deletion of dsc2 prevents pull down|deletion of dsc4 prevents pull down	-	BIOGRID
870070	2539260	2542884	275830	279329	SPCC285.11	SPAC1486.02c	dsc5	dsc2	ucp10	ucp14	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lloyd SJ (2013)	23760507	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	deletion of dsc2 prevents pull down	-	BIOGRID
870071	2539260	2541990	275830	278474	SPCC285.11	SPAC20H4.02	dsc5	dsc3	ucp10	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lloyd SJ (2013)	23760507	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	deletion of dsc2 prevents pull down|deletion of dsc4 prevents pull down	-	BIOGRID
870072	2539260	2543396	275830	279818	SPCC285.11	SPAC4D7.11	dsc5	dsc4	ucp10	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lloyd SJ (2013)	23760507	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	deletion of dsc2 prevents pull down	-	BIOGRID
870073	2541990	2541251	278474	277765	SPAC20H4.02	SPBC947.10	dsc3	dsc1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lloyd SJ (2013)	23760507	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	deletion of dsc2 prevents pull down|deletion of dsc4 prevents pull down	-	BIOGRID
870074	2541990	2542884	278474	279329	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC1486.02c	dsc3	dsc2	-	ucp14	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lloyd SJ (2013)	23760507	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	deletion of dsc2 prevents pull down|deletion of dsc4 prevents pull down	-	BIOGRID
870075	2541990	2543396	278474	279818	SPAC20H4.02	SPAC4D7.11	dsc3	dsc4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lloyd SJ (2013)	23760507	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	deletion of dsc2 prevents pull down|deletion of dsc4 prevents pull down	-	BIOGRID
870076	2541990	2539260	278474	275830	SPAC20H4.02	SPCC285.11	dsc3	dsc5	-	ucp10	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lloyd SJ (2013)	23760507	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	deletion of dsc2 prevents pull down|deletion of dsc4 prevents pull down	-	BIOGRID
870077	2543396	2541251	279818	277765	SPAC4D7.11	SPBC947.10	dsc4	dsc1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lloyd SJ (2013)	23760507	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	deletion of dsc2 prevents pull down	-	BIOGRID
870078	2543396	2542884	279818	279329	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC1486.02c	dsc4	dsc2	-	ucp14	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lloyd SJ (2013)	23760507	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	deletion of dsc2 prevents pull down	-	BIOGRID
870079	2543396	2541990	279818	278474	SPAC4D7.11	SPAC20H4.02	dsc4	dsc3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lloyd SJ (2013)	23760507	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	deletion of dsc2 prevents pull down	-	BIOGRID
870080	2543396	2539260	279818	275830	SPAC4D7.11	SPCC285.11	dsc4	dsc5	-	ucp10	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lloyd SJ (2013)	23760507	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	deletion of dsc2 prevents pull down	-	BIOGRID
870081	2541251	2542884	277765	279329	SPBC947.10	SPAC1486.02c	dsc1	dsc2	-	ucp14	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lloyd SJ (2013)	23760507	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	deletion of dsc2 prevents pull down	-	BIOGRID
870082	2541251	2541990	277765	278474	SPBC947.10	SPAC20H4.02	dsc1	dsc3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lloyd SJ (2013)	23760507	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	deletion of dsc2 prevents pull down|deletion of dsc4 prevents pull down	-	BIOGRID
870083	2541251	2543396	277765	279818	SPBC947.10	SPAC4D7.11	dsc1	dsc4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lloyd SJ (2013)	23760507	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	deletion of dsc2 prevents pull down	-	BIOGRID
870084	2541251	2539260	277765	275830	SPBC947.10	SPCC285.11	dsc1	dsc5	-	ucp10	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lloyd SJ (2013)	23760507	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	deletion of dsc2 prevents pull down|deletion of dsc4 prevents pull down	-	BIOGRID
870087	2542884	2541030	279329	277545	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC337.08c	dsc2	ubi4	ucp14	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Lloyd SJ (2013)	23760507	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	#LPPI|Likely protein-protein interaction|lysine 63-linked di-ubiquitin	-	BIOGRID
870090	2541044	2542884	277559	279329	SPBC354.05c	SPAC1486.02c	sre2	dsc2	-	ucp14	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lloyd SJ (2013)	23760507	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870091	2541044	2541990	277559	278474	SPBC354.05c	SPAC20H4.02	sre2	dsc3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lloyd SJ (2013)	23760507	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870092	2541044	2543396	277559	279818	SPBC354.05c	SPAC4D7.11	sre2	dsc4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lloyd SJ (2013)	23760507	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870093	2542123	3361400	278599	280476	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC1093.06c	mal3	dhc1	-	SPAC30C2.01c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yamashita A (2013)	23755176	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nuclear fusion during mating	-	-	BIOGRID
870094	2542123	2542069	278599	278546	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC27D7.13c	mal3	ssm4	-	SPAC637.01c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yamashita A (2013)	23755176	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nuclear fusion during mating	-	-	BIOGRID
870095	2540398	2540051	276926	276589	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC32H8.12c	dis3	act1	rrp44	cps8|pi012	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Coy S (2013)	23755256	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870096	2540398	2541813	276926	278304	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC2F7.14c	dis3	rrp4	rrp44	SPAC2F7.14c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Coy S (2013)	23755256	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870097	2540398	2539106	276926	275678	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC757.08	dis3	rrp45	rrp44	SPCC757.08	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Coy S (2013)	23755256	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870098	2540398	2540116	276926	276653	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC16G5.10	dis3	rrp42	rrp44	SPBC16G5.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Coy S (2013)	23755256	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870099	2540398	2540189	276926	276722	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC17D1.03c	dis3	rrp43	rrp44	SPBC17D1.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Coy S (2013)	23755256	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870100	2540398	2541837	276926	278328	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC22A12.12c	dis3	rrp40	rrp44	SPAC22A12.12c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Coy S (2013)	23755256	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870101	2540398	2539660	276926	276215	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC115.01c	dis3	rrp46	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Coy S (2013)	23755256	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870102	2540398	2539351	276926	275917	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC1840.11	dis3	csl4	rrp44	SPCC965.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Coy S (2013)	23755256	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870535	5802955	2543336	858093	279759	SPAC25G10.09c	SPAC688.11	pan1	end4	SPAC27F1.01c	sla2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Chen Q (2013)	23727096	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	endocytosis|protein/peptide distribution	pan1-delta(w) end4-delta(tld) double mutant has increased defect in actin patch assembly and endocytosis	-	BIOGRID
870536	2541738	2543336	278232	279759	SPAC20G4.06c	SPAC688.11	adf1	end4	cof1	sla2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chen Q (2013)	23727096	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	end4-delta858-1102 adf1-M2 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
870537	2539390	2543336	275955	279759	SPCC162.07	SPAC688.11	ent1	end4	-	sla2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Chen Q (2013)	23727096	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	ent1-delta(ac) end4-delta (tld) inviable	-	BIOGRID
870648	2543086	2540719	279519	277242	SPAC30D11.10	SPBC216.05	rad52	rad3	rad22|rad22A	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2013)	23779158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870649	2543086	2539215	279519	275785	SPAC30D11.10	SPCC285.16c	rad52	msh6	rad22|rad22A	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2013)	23779158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870650	2543086	2540148	279519	276685	SPAC30D11.10	SPBC16D10.04c	rad52	dna2	rad22|rad22A	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2013)	23779158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870651	2543086	2540695	279519	277219	SPAC30D11.10	SPBC19G7.01c	rad52	msh2	rad22|rad22A	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2013)	23779158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870652	2543086	2543392	279519	279814	SPAC30D11.10	SPAC8F11.03	rad52	msh3	rad22|rad22A	swi4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2013)	23779158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870653	2543086	2542875	279519	279320	SPAC30D11.10	SPAC13G7.02c	rad52	ssa1	rad22|rad22A	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2013)	23779158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870654	2543086	2539225	279519	275795	SPAC30D11.10	SPCC1739.13	rad52	ssa2	rad22|rad22A	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2013)	23779158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870655	2543086	2541158	279519	277673	SPAC30D11.10	SPBC660.13c	rad52	ssb1	rad22|rad22A	rad11|rpa1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2013)	23779158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870656	2543086	2539827	279519	276376	SPAC30D11.10	SPBC1861.02	rad52	abp2	rad22|rad22A	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2013)	23779158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870657	2543086	2541077	279519	277592	SPAC30D11.10	SPBC83.08	rad52	rvb2	rad22|rad22A	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2013)	23779158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870658	2543086	2543227	279519	279655	SPAC30D11.10	SPAPB8E5.09	rad52	rvb1	rad22|rad22A	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2013)	23779158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870659	2543086	2540121	279519	276658	SPAC30D11.10	SPBC119.14	rad52	rti1	rad22|rad22A	rad22B	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2013)	23779158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870660	2543086	2538781	279519	275362	SPAC30D11.10	SPCC1753.01c	rad52	ssb2	rad22|rad22A	SPCC584.06c|rpa2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2013)	23779158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870661	2543086	2539285	279519	275853	SPAC30D11.10	SPCC1672.02c	rad52	sap1	rad22|rad22A	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2013)	23779158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870662	2543086	2539843	279519	276391	SPAC30D11.10	SPBC16G5.11c	rad52	bag101	rad22|rad22A	bag1|bag1-a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2013)	23779158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870663	2543086	2541933	279519	278421	SPAC30D11.10	SPAC2F3.04c	rad52	rim1	rad22|rad22A	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2013)	23779158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870664	2539827	2543086	276376	279519	SPBC1861.02	SPAC30D11.10	abp2	rad52	-	rad22|rad22A	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Saito Y (2013)	23779158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870665	2539843	2543086	276391	279519	SPBC16G5.11c	SPAC30D11.10	bag101	rad52	bag1|bag1-a	rad22|rad22A	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Saito Y (2013)	23779158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870666	2540695	2543086	277219	279519	SPBC19G7.01c	SPAC30D11.10	msh2	rad52	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	rad22|rad22A	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Saito Y (2013)	23779158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870667	2539215	2543086	275785	279519	SPCC285.16c	SPAC30D11.10	msh6	rad52	-	rad22|rad22A	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Saito Y (2013)	23779158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870668	2541933	2543086	278421	279519	SPAC2F3.04c	SPAC30D11.10	rim1	rad52	-	rad22|rad22A	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Saito Y (2013)	23779158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870669	2540121	2543086	276658	279519	SPBC119.14	SPAC30D11.10	rti1	rad52	rad22B	rad22|rad22A	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Saito Y (2013)	23779158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870670	2541077	2543086	277592	279519	SPBC83.08	SPAC30D11.10	rvb2	rad52	-	rad22|rad22A	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Saito Y (2013)	23779158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870671	2539285	2543086	275853	279519	SPCC1672.02c	SPAC30D11.10	sap1	rad52	-	rad22|rad22A	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Saito Y (2013)	23779158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870672	2542875	2543086	279320	279519	SPAC13G7.02c	SPAC30D11.10	ssa1	rad52	-	rad22|rad22A	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Saito Y (2013)	23779158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870673	2541158	2543086	277673	279519	SPBC660.13c	SPAC30D11.10	ssb1	rad52	rad11|rpa1	rad22|rad22A	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Saito Y (2013)	23779158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870674	2538781	2543086	275362	279519	SPCC1753.01c	SPAC30D11.10	ssb2	rad52	SPCC584.06c|rpa2	rad22|rad22A	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Saito Y (2013)	23779158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
870675	2539843	2543040	276391	279475	SPBC16G5.11c	SPAC31G5.13	bag101	rpn11	bag1|bag1-a	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Saito Y (2013)	23779158	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
871652	2540821	3361342	277339	280418	SPBC800.03	SPBC16D10.07c	clr3	sir2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Alper BJ (2013)	23771057	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	loss of centromeric silencing and of centromeric heterochromatin	-	BIOGRID
872485	2539513	2543576	276075	279991	SPCC645.05c	SPAC4A8.05c	myo2	myp2	rng5	myo3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Mishra M (2013)	23770677	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis	myo2-E1 allele; contractile rings are fragmented or deformed and do not show ATP-dependent contraction	-	BIOGRID
874907	2540470	2543240	276998	279668	SPBC29A10.15	SPAC694.06c	orc1	mrc1	cdc30|orp1|rid1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Locovei AM (2010)	20799962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
874911	2540470	2539087	276998	275659	SPBC29A10.15	SPCC1259.13	orc1	chk1	cdc30|orp1|rid1	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Locovei AM (2010)	20799962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
874918	2539164	2539087	275735	275659	SPCC16A11.17	SPCC1259.13	mcm4	chk1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	rad27	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Locovei AM (2010)	20799962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	mutants form colonies of 4-8 cells	-	BIOGRID
874990	2539164	2543240	275735	279668	SPCC16A11.17	SPAC694.06c	mcm4	mrc1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Locovei AM (2010)	20799962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
875235	2542007	2540464	278490	276992	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC23E6.02	rad57	rrp2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	SPBC23E6.02	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dziadkowiec D (2013)	23828040	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutant shows increased sensitivity to camptothecin (CHEBI:27656) or hydroxyurea (CHEBI:44423)|rad57 rrp1 rqh1 or rad57 rrp2 rqh1 triple null mutant shows increased sensitivity to camptothecin (CHEBI:27656) relative to double mutants	-	BIOGRID
875236	2542440	2540464	278902	276992	SPAC17A2.12	SPBC23E6.02	rrp1	rrp2	SPAC17A2.12	SPBC23E6.02	Two-hybrid	physical	Dziadkowiec D (2013)	23828040	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
875237	2542440	2542440	278902	278902	SPAC17A2.12	SPAC17A2.12	rrp1	rrp1	SPAC17A2.12	SPAC17A2.12	Two-hybrid	physical	Dziadkowiec D (2013)	23828040	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
875238	2540464	2542440	276992	278902	SPBC23E6.02	SPAC17A2.12	rrp2	rrp1	SPBC23E6.02	SPAC17A2.12	Two-hybrid	physical	Dziadkowiec D (2013)	23828040	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
875239	2540574	2542440	277101	278902	SPBC409.03	SPAC17A2.12	swi5	rrp1	-	SPAC17A2.12	Two-hybrid	physical	Dziadkowiec D (2013)	23828040	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
875240	2540574	2540464	277101	276992	SPBC409.03	SPBC23E6.02	swi5	rrp2	-	SPBC23E6.02	Two-hybrid	physical	Dziadkowiec D (2013)	23828040	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
875241	2540927	2540464	277443	276992	SPBC365.06	SPBC23E6.02	pmt3	rrp2	smt3|ubl2	SPBC23E6.02	Two-hybrid	physical	Dziadkowiec D (2013)	23828040	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
875242	2540927	2542440	277443	278902	SPBC365.06	SPAC17A2.12	pmt3	rrp1	smt3|ubl2	SPAC17A2.12	Two-hybrid	physical	Dziadkowiec D (2013)	23828040	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
875244	2542007	2543577	278490	279992	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC4H3.05	rad57	srs2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dziadkowiec D (2013)	23828040	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	increased sensitivity to camptothecin (CHEBI:27656) or hydroxyurea (CHEBI:44423)	-	BIOGRID
875245	2540584	2543577	277110	279992	SPBC28F2.07	SPAC4H3.05	sfr1	srs2	dds20|mug13	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dziadkowiec D (2013)	23828040	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	increased sensitivity to camptothecin (CHEBI:27656)	-	BIOGRID
875246	2540574	2543577	277101	279992	SPBC409.03	SPAC4H3.05	swi5	srs2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dziadkowiec D (2013)	23828040	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	increased sensitivity to camptothecin (CHEBI:27656)	-	BIOGRID
875247	2543580	2541620	279995	278117	SPAC644.14c	SPAC2G11.12	rad51	rqh1	rhp51	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dziadkowiec D (2013)	23828040	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	increased sensitivity to camptothecin (CHEBI:27656), methyl methanesulfonate (CHEBI:25255), or UV	-	BIOGRID
875248	2542007	2541620	278490	278117	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC2G11.12	rad57	rqh1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dziadkowiec D (2013)	23828040	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	increased sensitivity to camptothecin (CHEBI:27656)|rad57 rrp1 rqh1 or rad57 rrp2 rqh1 triple null mutant; greatly increased sensitivity to camptothecin (CHEBI:27656)	-	BIOGRID
875249	2542007	2542440	278490	278902	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC17A2.12	rad57	rrp1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	SPAC17A2.12	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dziadkowiec D (2013)	23828040	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	rad57 rrp1 rqh1 or rad57 rrp2 rqh1 triple null mutant; greatly increased sensitivity to camptothecin (CHEBI:27656)	-	BIOGRID
875250	2542440	2541620	278902	278117	SPAC17A2.12	SPAC2G11.12	rrp1	rqh1	SPAC17A2.12	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dziadkowiec D (2013)	23828040	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	rad57 rrp1 rqh1 or rad57 rrp2 rqh1 triple null mutant; greatly increased sensitivity to camptothecin (CHEBI:27656)	-	BIOGRID
875251	2540464	2541620	276992	278117	SPBC23E6.02	SPAC2G11.12	rrp2	rqh1	SPBC23E6.02	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dziadkowiec D (2013)	23828040	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	rad57 rrp1 rqh1 or rad57 rrp2 rqh1 triple null mutant; greatly increased sensitivity to camptothecin (CHEBI:27656)	-	BIOGRID
875252	2541620	2542007	278117	278490	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC20H4.07	rqh1	rad57	hus2|rad12|rec9	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Dziadkowiec D (2013)	23828040	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic recombination	decreased proportion of cells with cut, fragmented and unequally segregated nuclei when cells treated with hydroxyurea (CHEBI:44423), relative to rqh1 single mutant	-	BIOGRID
875253	2541620	2540574	278117	277101	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC409.03	rqh1	swi5	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Dziadkowiec D (2013)	23828040	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic recombination	decreased proportion of cells with cut, fragmented and unequally segregated nuclei when cells treated with hydroxyurea (CHEBI:44423), relative to rqh1 single mutant	-	BIOGRID
875950	2540473	2542436	277001	278898	SPBC30D10.10c	SPACUNK4.12c	tor1	iph1	-	mug138|irp1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Beuzelin C (2013)	23826334	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	decreased sensitivity of double mutant cells to tunicamycin (CHEBI:29699) or to DTT (CHEBI:42106) relative to tor1 single mutant	-	BIOGRID
879376	2540316	3361511	276846	280587	SPBC27B12.08	SPAC23C4.08	sip1	rho3	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yu Y (2013)	23840894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|protein secretion:wild type|protein/peptide distribution:wild type|resistance to chemicals:wild type|vacuolar morphology:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	rho3 rescues secretion, vacuole fusion and protein localization defects in a sip1 mutant|rho3 rescues sensitivity to high temp, MgCl2, micofungin (Chebi: 600520), FK506 (Chebi: 61049) and VPA (Chebi: 39867) seen in a sip1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
879377	2540316	3361511	276846	280587	SPBC27B12.08	SPAC23C4.08	sip1	rho3	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Yu Y (2013)	23840894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
879378	2540316	2539311	276846	275878	SPBC27B12.08	SPCP1E11.06	sip1	apl4	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Yu Y (2013)	23840894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
879379	2540316	2541255	276846	277769	SPBC27B12.08	SPBC947.02	sip1	apl2	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Yu Y (2013)	23840894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
879380	2540316	2541306	276846	277818	SPBC27B12.08	SPBP16F5.07	sip1	apm1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Yu Y (2013)	23840894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
879381	2540316	2542890	276846	279334	SPBC27B12.08	SPAC13G6.14	sip1	aps1	-	SPAC24B11.03	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Yu Y (2013)	23840894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
879382	2541306	3361511	277818	280587	SPBP16F5.07	SPAC23C4.08	apm1	rho3	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Yu Y (2013)	23840894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	only in the presence of sip1	-	BIOGRID
879721	2541513	2541513	278014	278014	SPAC227.13c	SPAC227.13c	isu1	isu1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Wu G (2002)	11939799	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879722	2539409	2539409	275974	275974	SPCC645.03c	SPCC645.03c	isa1	isa1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Wu G (2002)	11941510	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Isa1 forms a multimer in vitro	-	POMBASE
879723	2539180	2542140	275751	278616	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC1783.07c	sts5	pap1	orb4	caf3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Toda T (1991)	1899230	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	expression of pap1 or spk1 rescues sensitivity to Staurosporine (Chebi: 15738)	-	POMBASE
879724	2539180	2542474	275751	278934	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC31G5.09c	sts5	spk1	orb4	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Toda T (1991)	1899230	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	expression of pap1 or spk1 rescues sensitivity to Staurosporine (Chebi: 15738)	-	POMBASE
879725	2539649	2542140	276204	278616	SPBC12D12.04c	SPAC1783.07c	pck2	pap1	pkc1|sts6	caf3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Toda T (1991)	1899230	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	expression of pap1 or spk1 rescues sensitivity to Staurosporine (Chebi: 15738)	-	POMBASE
879726	2539649	2542474	276204	278934	SPBC12D12.04c	SPAC31G5.09c	pck2	spk1	pkc1|sts6	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Toda T (1991)	1899230	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	expression of pap1 or spk1 rescues sensitivity to Staurosporine (Chebi: 15738)	-	POMBASE
879727	2540620	2542477	277146	278937	SPBC4.04c	SPAC1B2.05	mcm2	mcm5	cdc19|nda1	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	Co-fractionation	physical	Okishio N (1996)	8838655	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879728	2540281	3361558	276812	280634	SPBC2G2.14	SPAC14C4.16	csi1	dad3	SPBC2G2.14	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hou H (2012)	23166349	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	POMBASE
879729	2540281	2542311	276812	278777	SPBC2G2.14	SPAC16A10.05c	csi1	dad1	SPBC2G2.14	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hou H (2012)	23166349	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	POMBASE
879730	2540281	2542418	276812	278881	SPBC2G2.14	SPAC1805.07c	csi1	dad2	SPBC2G2.14	hos2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hou H (2012)	23166349	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	POMBASE
879731	2540281	2542489	276812	278948	SPBC2G2.14	SPAC589.08c	csi1	dam1	SPBC2G2.14	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hou H (2012)	23166349	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	POMBASE
879732	2540281	2542102	276812	278578	SPBC2G2.14	SPAC8C9.17c	csi1	spc34	SPBC2G2.14	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hou H (2012)	23166349	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	POMBASE
879733	2540281	2540060	276812	276598	SPBC2G2.14	SPBC106.01	csi1	mph1	SPBC2G2.14	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hou H (2012)	23166349	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	POMBASE
879734	2540281	2540498	276812	277026	SPBC2G2.14	SPBC27.02c	csi1	ask1	SPBC2G2.14	mug181	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hou H (2012)	23166349	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	POMBASE
879735	2540281	2540249	276812	276781	SPBC2G2.14	SPBC32F12.08c	csi1	duo1	SPBC2G2.14	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hou H (2012)	23166349	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	POMBASE
879736	2540281	5802828	276812	857966	SPBC2G2.14	SPBC3B9.22c	csi1	dad4	SPBC2G2.14	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hou H (2012)	23166349	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	POMBASE
879737	2540281	2540320	276812	276850	SPBC2G2.14	SPBC3D6.04c	csi1	mad1	SPBC2G2.14	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hou H (2012)	23166349	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	POMBASE
879738	2540281	5802726	276812	857864	SPBC2G2.14	SPCC1223.15c	csi1	spc19	SPBC2G2.14	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hou H (2012)	23166349	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	POMBASE
879739	2540281	2538736	276812	275320	SPBC2G2.14	SPCC1322.12c	csi1	bub1	SPBC2G2.14	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hou H (2012)	23166349	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	POMBASE
879740	2540281	2539507	276812	276070	SPBC2G2.14	SPCC417.02	csi1	dad5	SPBC2G2.14	hos3|hsk3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hou H (2012)	23166349	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	POMBASE
879741	2540281	2539505	276812	276068	SPBC2G2.14	SPCC736.14	csi1	dis1	SPBC2G2.14	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hou H (2012)	23166349	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	POMBASE
879742	2540281	2540589	276812	277115	SPBC2G2.14	SPBC20F10.06	csi1	mad2	SPBC2G2.14	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Hou H (2012)	23166349	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	POMBASE
879743	2540281	2539219	276812	275789	SPBC2G2.14	SPCC1795.01c	csi1	mad3	SPBC2G2.14	SPCC895.02	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Hou H (2012)	23166349	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	POMBASE
879744	2540281	2539497	276812	276060	SPBC2G2.14	SPCC895.07	csi1	alp14	SPBC2G2.14	mtc1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Hou H (2012)	23166349	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	POMBASE
879745	2539775	2542513	276326	278971	SPBC14C8.17c	SPAC1952.05	spt8	gcn5	sep9	kat2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Helmlinger D (2011)	21642955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type|mating efficiency:wild type	deletion of gcn5 suppresses the mating and ste11/mei2 expression defects seen in an spt8 mutant	-	BIOGRID
879746	2539242	2541220	275812	277734	SPCC290.04	SPBC8D2.04	ams2	hht2	SPCC4F11.01	h3.2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Takayama Y (2007)	17452352	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	POMBASE
879747	2541220	2539242	277734	275812	SPBC8D2.04	SPCC290.04	hht2	ams2	h3.2	SPCC4F11.01	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Takayama Y (2007)	17452352	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	POMBASE
879748	2541605	2540721	278102	277244	SPAC1F7.01c	SPBC19G7.16	spt6	iws1	SPAC694.07c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kiely CM (2011)	21844224	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879749	2540880	2539869	277397	276415	SPBC582.03	SPBC11B10.09	cdc13	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bueno A (1991)	1829983	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type|heat sensitivity:wild type	As a control, we confirmed that overexpression of cdc2 did rescue cdc13-117	-	POMBASE
879750	2538829	2540810	275410	277329	SPCC306.09c	SPBC19C7.03	cap1	cyr1	cap	git2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kawamukai M (1992)	1550959	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	adenylyl cyclase activity is co-precipitated using a cap1 antibody	-	POMBASE
879751	2540234	2540013	276766	276557	SPBC336.12c	SPBC14C8.07c	cdc10	cdc18	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ogawa Y (1999)	10490657	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue|protein/peptide distribution:partial rescue	constitutive expression of cdc18 rescues the association of mcm6 that is lost in a cdc10 mutant and the loss of DNA replication	-	POMBASE
879752	3361460	2539108	280536	275680	SPAC17A2.01	SPCC1223.02	bsu1	nmt1	SPAC1B1.05|car1|sod1	thi3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Niederberger C (1996)	8675019	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient utilization|vegetative growth	double mutants show growth defects at multiple concentrations of thiamine and pyrimidine	-	POMBASE
879753	2541089	2543347	277604	279769	SPBC646.09c	SPAPB8E5.02c	int6	rpn502	yin6	rpn5|rpn5-b	Two-hybrid	physical	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879754	2541089	2543347	277604	279769	SPBC646.09c	SPAPB8E5.02c	int6	rpn502	yin6	rpn5|rpn5-b	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879755	2543347	2541089	279769	277604	SPAPB8E5.02c	SPBC646.09c	rpn502	int6	rpn5|rpn5-b	yin6	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879756	2543347	2543412	279769	279834	SPAPB8E5.02c	SPAC637.07	rpn502	moe1	rpn5|rpn5-b	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
879757	2543347	2540025	279769	276569	SPAPB8E5.02c	SPBC16G5.01	rpn502	rpn12	rpn5|rpn5-b	SPBC342.07|mts3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
879758	2543347	2540939	279769	277455	SPAPB8E5.02c	SPBC4.07c	rpn502	rpt2	rpn5|rpn5-b	mts2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
879759	2543347	2541268	279769	277782	SPAPB8E5.02c	SPBP19A11.03c	rpn502	mts4	rpn5|rpn5-b	rpn1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
879760	2541089	2543347	277604	279769	SPBC646.09c	SPAPB8E5.02c	int6	rpn502	yin6	rpn5|rpn5-b	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
879763	2542503	2542204	278961	278679	SPAC19A8.12	SPAC17A5.14	dcp2	exo2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang CY (2013)	23319050	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879764	2542503	5802967	278961	858105	SPAC19A8.12	SPAC20G4.08	dcp2	pdc1	-	SPAC20G4.08|SPAC4F10.01	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang CY (2013)	23319050	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879765	2542503	2541033	278961	277548	SPAC19A8.12	SPBC3B9.21	dcp2	dcp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang CY (2013)	23319050	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879766	2542632	2543666	279086	280080	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC644.06c	cdc25	cdr1	sal2	nim1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Millar JB (1992)	1464318	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	-	-	POMBASE
879767	2541202	2543133	277716	279565	SPBC887.18c	SPAC12G12.05c	hfi1	taf9	ada1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879768	2541202	2542135	277716	278611	SPBC887.18c	SPAC13A11.04c	hfi1	ubp8	ada1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879769	2541202	2542785	277716	279234	SPBC887.18c	SPAC15A10.02	hfi1	taf12	ada1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879770	2541202	2542513	277716	278971	SPBC887.18c	SPAC1952.05	hfi1	gcn5	ada1	kat2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879771	2541202	2543675	277716	280089	SPBC887.18c	SPAC4D7.10c	hfi1	spt20	ada1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879772	2541202	3361397	277716	280473	SPBC887.18c	SPAC57A10.14	hfi1	sgf11	ada1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879773	2541202	2539775	277716	276326	SPBC887.18c	SPBC14C8.17c	hfi1	spt8	ada1	sep9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879774	2541202	2540787	277716	277306	SPBC887.18c	SPBC1921.07c	hfi1	sgf29	ada1	SPBC21D10.13	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879775	2541202	2540614	277716	277140	SPBC887.18c	SPBC21H7.02	hfi1	taf10	ada1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879776	2541202	2540408	277716	276936	SPBC887.18c	SPBC25H2.11c	hfi1	spt7	ada1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879777	2541202	2540436	277716	276964	SPBC887.18c	SPBC28F2.10c	hfi1	ngg1	ada1	ada3|kap1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879778	2541202	3361305	277716	280381	SPBC887.18c	SPBC6B1.12c	hfi1	sus1	ada1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879779	2541202	2541265	277716	277779	SPBC887.18c	SPBP16F5.03c	hfi1	tra1	ada1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879780	2541202	2538769	277716	275352	SPBC887.18c	SPCC126.04c	hfi1	sgf73	ada1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879781	2541202	2539133	277716	275705	SPBC887.18c	SPCC16C4.18c	hfi1	taf6	ada1	taf50	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879782	2541202	2539174	277716	275745	SPBC887.18c	SPCC24B10.08c	hfi1	ada2	ada1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879783	2541202	2539353	277716	275919	SPBC887.18c	SPCC5E4.03c	hfi1	taf5	ada1	taf72	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879784	2541202	2539570	277716	276130	SPBC887.18c	SPCC61.02	hfi1	spt3	ada1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879785	2540408	2543133	276936	279565	SPBC25H2.11c	SPAC12G12.05c	spt7	taf9	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879786	2540408	2542135	276936	278611	SPBC25H2.11c	SPAC13A11.04c	spt7	ubp8	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879787	2540408	2542785	276936	279234	SPBC25H2.11c	SPAC15A10.02	spt7	taf12	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879788	2540408	2542513	276936	278971	SPBC25H2.11c	SPAC1952.05	spt7	gcn5	-	kat2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879789	2540408	2543675	276936	280089	SPBC25H2.11c	SPAC4D7.10c	spt7	spt20	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879790	2540408	3361397	276936	280473	SPBC25H2.11c	SPAC57A10.14	spt7	sgf11	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879791	2540408	2539775	276936	276326	SPBC25H2.11c	SPBC14C8.17c	spt7	spt8	-	sep9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879792	2540408	2540787	276936	277306	SPBC25H2.11c	SPBC1921.07c	spt7	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879793	2540408	2540614	276936	277140	SPBC25H2.11c	SPBC21H7.02	spt7	taf10	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879794	2540408	2540436	276936	276964	SPBC25H2.11c	SPBC28F2.10c	spt7	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879795	2540408	3361305	276936	280381	SPBC25H2.11c	SPBC6B1.12c	spt7	sus1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879796	2540408	2541202	276936	277716	SPBC25H2.11c	SPBC887.18c	spt7	hfi1	-	ada1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879797	2540408	2541265	276936	277779	SPBC25H2.11c	SPBP16F5.03c	spt7	tra1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879798	2540408	2538769	276936	275352	SPBC25H2.11c	SPCC126.04c	spt7	sgf73	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879799	2540408	2539133	276936	275705	SPBC25H2.11c	SPCC16C4.18c	spt7	taf6	-	taf50	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879800	2540408	2539174	276936	275745	SPBC25H2.11c	SPCC24B10.08c	spt7	ada2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879801	2540408	2539353	276936	275919	SPBC25H2.11c	SPCC5E4.03c	spt7	taf5	-	taf72	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879802	2540408	2539570	276936	276130	SPBC25H2.11c	SPCC61.02	spt7	spt3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879803	2542513	2539775	278971	276326	SPAC1952.05	SPBC14C8.17c	gcn5	spt8	kat2	sep9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating response:wild type	spt8 and spt20 both suppress the gcn5-delta mating phenotype	-	POMBASE
879804	2542513	2543675	278971	280089	SPAC1952.05	SPAC4D7.10c	gcn5	spt20	kat2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating response:wild type	spt8 and spt20 both suppress the gcn5-delta mating phenotype	-	POMBASE
879805	2542513	2540258	278971	276789	SPAC1952.05	SPBC32C12.02	gcn5	ste11	kat2	aff1|stex	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating response:wild type	ste11 and rst2 both suppress the gcn5-delta mating phenotype	-	POMBASE
879806	2542513	2543031	278971	279467	SPAC1952.05	SPAC6F12.02	gcn5	rst2	kat2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Helmlinger D (2008)	19056896	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating response:wild type	ste11 and rst2 both suppress the gcn5-delta mating phenotype	-	POMBASE
879807	2542823	2538734	279270	275318	SPAC144.03	SPCC1322.13	ade2	ade6	min10|min3	min1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Speiser DM (1992)	1448066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chemical compound accumulation|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show hypersensitivity to Cd and reduced sulfide production	-	POMBASE
879808	2542823	2541029	279270	277544	SPAC144.03	SPBC409.10	ade2	ade7	min10|min3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Speiser DM (1992)	1448066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chemical compound accumulation|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show hypersensitivity to Cd and reduced sulfide production	-	POMBASE
879809	2539658	2540895	276213	277411	SPBC1105.17	SPBC577.15c	cnp1	sim3	sim2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dunleavy EM (2007)	18158900	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879810	2540895	2539658	277411	276213	SPBC577.15c	SPBC1105.17	sim3	cnp1	-	sim2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dunleavy EM (2007)	18158900	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879811	2542467	2540895	278928	277411	SPAC1834.04	SPBC577.15c	hht1	sim3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dunleavy EM (2007)	18158900	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879812	2541220	2540895	277734	277411	SPBC8D2.04	SPBC577.15c	hht2	sim3	h3.2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dunleavy EM (2007)	18158900	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879813	2539804	2539804	276354	276354	SPBC1105.11c	SPBC1105.11c	hht3	hht3	h3.3	h3.3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dunleavy EM (2007)	18158900	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879814	2540895	2542467	277411	278928	SPBC577.15c	SPAC1834.04	sim3	hht1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dunleavy EM (2007)	18158900	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879815	2540895	2541220	277411	277734	SPBC577.15c	SPBC8D2.04	sim3	hht2	-	h3.2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dunleavy EM (2007)	18158900	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879816	2540895	2539804	277411	276354	SPBC577.15c	SPBC1105.11c	sim3	hht3	-	h3.3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dunleavy EM (2007)	18158900	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879817	2539658	2540895	276213	277411	SPBC1105.17	SPBC577.15c	cnp1	sim3	sim2	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Dunleavy EM (2007)	18158900	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
879818	2542467	2540895	278928	277411	SPAC1834.04	SPBC577.15c	hht1	sim3	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Dunleavy EM (2007)	18158900	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
879819	2541220	2540895	277734	277411	SPBC8D2.04	SPBC577.15c	hht2	sim3	h3.2	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Dunleavy EM (2007)	18158900	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
879820	2539804	2539804	276354	276354	SPBC1105.11c	SPBC1105.11c	hht3	hht3	h3.3	h3.3	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Dunleavy EM (2007)	18158900	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
879821	2540895	2539658	277411	276213	SPBC577.15c	SPBC1105.17	sim3	cnp1	-	sim2	Two-hybrid	physical	Dunleavy EM (2007)	18158900	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
879822	2540895	2542467	277411	278928	SPBC577.15c	SPAC1834.04	sim3	hht1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Dunleavy EM (2007)	18158900	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
879823	2540895	2541220	277411	277734	SPBC577.15c	SPBC8D2.04	sim3	hht2	-	h3.2	Two-hybrid	physical	Dunleavy EM (2007)	18158900	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
879824	2540895	2539804	277411	276354	SPBC577.15c	SPBC1105.11c	sim3	hht3	-	h3.3	Two-hybrid	physical	Dunleavy EM (2007)	18158900	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
879825	2539123	2539242	275695	275812	SPCC18B5.03	SPCC290.04	wee1	ams2	-	SPCC4F11.01	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Takayama Y (2008)	18077559	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	POMBASE
879826	2539242	2542632	275812	279086	SPCC290.04	SPAC24H6.05	ams2	cdc25	SPCC4F11.01	sal2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Takayama Y (2008)	18077559	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	ams2/cdc25 double mutants show improved growth compared to ams2 single mutants	-	POMBASE
879827	2538951	2542029	275525	278511	SPCC297.03	SPAC8E11.02c	ssp1	rad24	-	anr5|sam4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879828	2538951	2542252	275525	278722	SPCC297.03	SPAC17A2.13c	ssp1	rad25	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879829	2538951	2541258	275525	277772	SPCC297.03	SPBC8E4.01c	ssp1	SPBC8E4.01c	-	SPBP4G3.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879830	2538951	2540711	275525	277234	SPCC297.03	SPBC215.12	ssp1	cwf10	-	snu114|spef2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879831	2538951	2542347	275525	278812	SPCC297.03	SPAC1751.03	ssp1	SPAC1751.03	-	csn7|csn72|csn7b|SPAC31A2.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879834	2541117	2539511	277632	276073	SPBC646.13	SPCC663.01c	sds23	ekc1	moc1|psp1	SPCC777.16c|eck1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879835	2541117	2538758	277632	275341	SPBC646.13	SPCC1739.12	sds23	ppe1	moc1|psp1	esp1|ppx1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879836	2541117	2543042	277632	279477	SPBC646.13	SPAP8A3.09c	sds23	paa1	moc1|psp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879837	2541117	2542052	277632	278531	SPBC646.13	SPAC823.15	sds23	ppa1	moc1|psp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879838	2541117	2538846	277632	275427	SPBC646.13	SPCC1919.10c	sds23	myo52	moc1|psp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879839	2541117	2542235	277632	278707	SPBC646.13	SPAC18G6.05c	sds23	SPAC18G6.05c	moc1|psp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879840	2541117	2541814	277632	278305	SPBC646.13	SPAC23G3.06	sds23	SPAC23G3.06	moc1|psp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879841	2541117	2542191	277632	278666	SPBC646.13	SPAC17A5.12	sds23	ucp7	moc1|psp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879842	2541117	2539102	277632	275674	SPBC646.13	SPCC1919.15	sds23	brl1	moc1|psp1	SPCC790.01|rfp2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879843	2541117	2540898	277632	277414	SPBC646.13	SPBC4F6.17c	sds23	SPBC4F6.17c	moc1|psp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879844	2541117	2539208	277632	275778	SPBC646.13	SPCC1450.11c	sds23	cek1	moc1|psp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879845	2541117	2540072	277632	276610	SPBC646.13	SPBC16H5.07c	sds23	ppa2	moc1|psp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879846	2541117	2541519	277632	278020	SPBC646.13	SPAC227.07c	sds23	pab1	moc1|psp1	ret1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
879947	2541117	2538951	277632	275525	SPBC646.13	SPCC297.03	sds23	ssp1	moc1|psp1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	POMBASE
880012	2538951	2541117	275525	277632	SPCC297.03	SPBC646.13	ssp1	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	POMBASE
880013	2539511	2541614	276073	278111	SPCC663.01c	SPAC29A4.20	ekc1	elp3	SPCC777.16c|eck1	kat9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
880014	2539511	2540822	276073	277340	SPCC663.01c	SPBC18E5.05c	ekc1	elp5	SPCC777.16c|eck1	iki1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
880015	2539511	2540419	276073	276947	SPCC663.01c	SPBC30B4.05	ekc1	kap109	SPCC777.16c|eck1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
880016	2539511	2541017	276073	277532	SPCC663.01c	SPBC36.07	ekc1	elp1	SPCC777.16c|eck1	iki3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
880017	2539511	2540979	276073	277495	SPCC663.01c	SPBC3H7.10	ekc1	elp6	SPCC777.16c|eck1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
880018	2539511	2541117	276073	277632	SPCC663.01c	SPBC646.13	ekc1	sds23	SPCC777.16c|eck1	moc1|psp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
880019	2539511	2538987	276073	275561	SPCC663.01c	SPCC11E10.06c	ekc1	elp4	SPCC777.16c|eck1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
880020	2539511	2538758	276073	275341	SPCC663.01c	SPCC1739.12	ekc1	ppe1	SPCC777.16c|eck1	esp1|ppx1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
880021	2539511	2538898	276073	275476	SPCC663.01c	SPCC4B3.16	ekc1	tip41	SPCC777.16c|eck1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
880022	2539511	2538986	276073	275560	SPCC663.01c	SPCC895.06	ekc1	elp2	SPCC777.16c|eck1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
880023	2541117	2543042	277632	279477	SPBC646.13	SPAP8A3.09c	sds23	paa1	moc1|psp1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
880024	2539511	2541117	276073	277632	SPCC663.01c	SPBC646.13	ekc1	sds23	SPCC777.16c|eck1	moc1|psp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
880025	2543042	2541117	279477	277632	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC646.13	paa1	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
880278	2541117	2539511	277632	276073	SPBC646.13	SPCC663.01c	sds23	ekc1	moc1|psp1	SPCC777.16c|eck1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
880279	2539511	2541117	276073	277632	SPCC663.01c	SPBC646.13	ekc1	sds23	SPCC777.16c|eck1	moc1|psp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
880280	5802929	2541773	858067	278267	SPAC1556.08c	SPAC23H4.02	cbs2	ppk9	SPAC1F12.01c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
880281	5802929	2543626	858067	280040	SPAC1556.08c	SPAC4D7.08c	cbs2	ade4	SPAC1F12.01c	aza1|min13	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
880282	5802929	2539130	858067	275702	SPAC1556.08c	SPCC1919.03c	cbs2	amk2	SPAC1F12.01c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
880283	5802929	2539109	858067	275681	SPAC1556.08c	SPCC74.03c	cbs2	ssp2	SPAC1F12.01c	ucp9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
880284	2539109	5802929	275681	858067	SPCC74.03c	SPAC1556.08c	ssp2	cbs2	ucp9	SPAC1F12.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
880285	2539109	2543626	275681	280040	SPCC74.03c	SPAC4D7.08c	ssp2	ade4	ucp9	aza1|min13	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
880286	2539109	2539130	275681	275702	SPCC74.03c	SPCC1919.03c	ssp2	amk2	ucp9	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hanyu Y (2009)	19371376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882410	2540751	2539366	277273	275932	SPBC20F10.10	SPCC16C4.11	psl1	pef1	-	p31	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen BR (2013)	23874875	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 4A	-	BIOGRID
882411	2540673	2539366	277198	275932	SPBC1D7.03	SPCC16C4.11	mug80	pef1	-	p31	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen BR (2013)	23874875	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3b	-	BIOGRID
882412	2539366	2540673	275932	277198	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC1D7.03	pef1	mug80	p31	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Chen BR (2013)	23874875	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3A	-	BIOGRID
882434	2542176	2543583	278651	279998	SPAC13C5.02	SPAC644.12	dre4	cdc5	hgp1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ren L (2011)	21386897	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	cdc5-120 allele	-	POMBASE
882435	2541720	2538770	278214	275353	SPAC23H3.13c	SPCC1753.02c	gpa2	git3	git8	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Ivey FD (2010)	20139237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	interaction enhanced by Git5	-	POMBASE
882457	2541889	2539205	278379	275775	SPAC2F7.03c	SPCC4B3.15	pom1	mid1	-	dmf1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Baehler J (1998)	9573052	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	POMBASE
882458	2540013	2539164	276557	275735	SPBC14C8.07c	SPCC16A11.17	cdc18	mcm4	-	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kearsey SE (2000)	10747035	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:undetermined	inactivation of mcm4 (cdc21-M68) inhibited re-replication caused by cdc18 overexpression	-	POMBASE
882459	2540620	2542477	277146	278937	SPBC4.04c	SPAC1B2.05	mcm2	mcm5	cdc19|nda1	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Forsburg SL (1997)	9383050	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	POMBASE
882460	2540620	2540784	277146	277303	SPBC4.04c	SPBC211.04c	mcm2	mcm6	cdc19|nda1	mis5	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Forsburg SL (1997)	9383050	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	POMBASE
882461	2540620	2539164	277146	275735	SPBC4.04c	SPCC16A11.17	mcm2	mcm4	cdc19|nda1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Forsburg SL (1997)	9383050	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	POMBASE
882462	2540470	2539164	276998	275735	SPBC29A10.15	SPCC16A11.17	orc1	mcm4	cdc30|orp1|rid1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Grallert B (1996)	8895665	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	orp1-4 cdc21-M68	-	BIOGRID
882463	2540470	2540013	276998	276557	SPBC29A10.15	SPBC14C8.07c	orc1	cdc18	cdc30|orp1|rid1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Grallert B (1996)	8895665	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression	overexpression of cdc18 rescues checkpoint defect in orp1-4 mutant	-	POMBASE
882464	2542083	2540255	278560	276786	SPAC27E2.05	SPBC336.04	cdc1	cdc6	mis1	mis10|pol3|pold	Dosage Rescue	genetic	MacNeill SA (1996)	8887553	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	overexpression of pol3 rescues growth of cdc1-18	-	POMBASE
882465	2542083	2540255	278560	276786	SPAC27E2.05	SPBC336.04	cdc1	cdc6	mis1	mis10|pol3|pold	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	MacNeill SA (1996)	8887553	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	cdc1-P13 cdc6-121	-	POMBASE
882466	2542083	2540008	278560	276552	SPAC27E2.05	SPBC12D12.02c	cdc1	cdm1	mis1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	MacNeill SA (1996)	8887553	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	overexpression of cdm1 rescues growth of cdc1-P13	-	POMBASE
882467	2540234	2542696	276766	279149	SPBC336.12c	SPAC29B12.03	cdc10	spd1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Woollard A (1996)	8887552	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	spd1 deletion allows passage through the cell cycle block of cdc10-129 cells	-	POMBASE
882468	2540234	2542696	276766	279149	SPBC336.12c	SPAC29B12.03	cdc10	spd1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Woollard A (1996)	8887552	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	spd1 deletion rescues growth of cdc10-129 mutant	-	BIOGRID
882470	2539164	2539869	275735	276415	SPCC16A11.17	SPBC11B10.09	mcm4	cdc2	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Maiorano D (1996)	8631307	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:undetermined	-	-	POMBASE
882471	2542558	2539164	279014	275735	SPAC1952.07	SPCC16A11.17	rad1	mcm4	rad19	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Maiorano D (1996)	8631307	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	POMBASE
882472	2542558	2539164	279014	275735	SPAC1952.07	SPCC16A11.17	rad1	mcm4	rad19	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Maiorano D (1996)	8631307	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	cdc21 rad1 double mutant had increased chromosomal abnormalities assayed by PFGE	-	BIOGRID
882473	2539869	2541159	276415	277674	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC685.09	cdc2	orc2	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	orp2	Two-hybrid	physical	Leatherwood J (1996)	8552194	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882474	2541159	2539869	277674	276415	SPBC685.09	SPBC11B10.09	orc2	cdc2	orp2	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Leatherwood J (1996)	8552194	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882475	2542558	2541159	279014	277674	SPAC1952.07	SPBC685.09	rad1	orc2	rad19	orp2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Leatherwood J (1996)	8552194	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Overexpression of Orp2 rescues hydroxyurea sensitivity of rad1-1 mutant	-	POMBASE
882476	2541159	2540013	277674	276557	SPBC685.09	SPBC14C8.07c	orc2	cdc18	orp2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Leatherwood J (1996)	8552194	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
882480	2540880	2541159	277397	277674	SPBC582.03	SPBC685.09	cdc13	orc2	-	orp2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Leatherwood J (1996)	8552194	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:undetermined	orp2 deletion prevents re-replication in cdc13 mutant	-	POMBASE
882486	2540341	2541871	276870	278361	SPBC2F12.11c	SPAC22F3.09c	rep2	res2	-	mcs1|pct1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nakashima N (1995)	7588609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882487	2540341	2541153	276870	277668	SPBC2F12.11c	SPBC725.16	rep2	res1	-	sct1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nakashima N (1995)	7588609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882488	2542632	2539869	279086	276415	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC11B10.09	cdc25	cdc2	sal2	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Booher R (1986)	3796591	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	Expression of cdc2.Asp146 rescues cdc25(Ts)	-	POMBASE
882494	2539733	2540292	276285	276823	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC28F2.12	pab2	rpb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882496	2539733	2542265	276285	278734	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC17A5.03	pab2	rpl301	-	rpl3|rpl3-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882497	2539733	2542204	276285	278679	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC17A5.14	pab2	exo2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882498	2539733	2542553	276285	279010	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC18G6.14c	pab2	rps7	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882499	2539733	2542503	276285	278961	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC19A8.12	pab2	dcp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882500	2539733	2541610	276285	278107	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC24C9.11	pab2	SPAC24C9.11	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882501	2539733	2542629	276285	279083	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC24H6.07	pab2	rps901	-	rps9-1|rps9a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882502	2539733	2541591	276285	278088	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC26A3.07c	pab2	rpl1101	-	rpl11|rpl11-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882503	2539733	2541491	276285	277993	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC2C4.16c	pab2	rps801	-	rps8|rps8-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882504	2539733	2543120	276285	279552	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC31G5.03	pab2	rps1101	-	rps11-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882505	2539733	2542725	276285	279176	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC3A12.10	pab2	rpl2001	-	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882506	2539733	2543393	276285	279815	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC4G9.08c	pab2	rpc2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882507	2539733	2543354	276285	279776	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC521.05	pab2	rps802	-	rps8-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882508	2539733	2541505	276285	278007	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC57A7.04c	pab2	pabp	-	pab1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882509	2539733	2541977	276285	278462	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC5D6.01	pab2	rps2202	-	rps15a-2|rps22-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882510	2539733	2543412	276285	279834	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC637.07	pab2	moe1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882511	2539733	2543553	276285	279970	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC664.05	pab2	rpl13	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882512	2539733	2541639	276285	278135	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC6F12.16c	pab2	mtr4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882513	2539733	2542108	276285	278584	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC6F6.07c	pab2	rps13	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882514	2539733	2542556	276285	279013	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC6G10.07	pab2	cbc1	-	SPAC6G10.07	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882515	2539733	2543475	276285	279895	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC890.08	pab2	rpl31	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882516	2539733	2543337	276285	279760	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC959.08	pab2	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882517	2539733	2542848	276285	279294	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC9G1.03c	pab2	rpl3001	-	rpl30|rpl30-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882518	2539733	2543644	276285	280058	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAPB1A10.03	pab2	nxt1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882519	2539733	2543309	276285	279733	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAPB8E5.06c	pab2	rpl302	-	rpl3-2|rpl3-b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882520	2539733	2539701	276285	276254	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC106.18	pab2	rpl2501	-	rpl25a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882521	2539733	2540003	276285	276547	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC1105.07c	pab2	SPBC1105.07c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882522	2539733	2539678	276285	276233	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC11C11.07	pab2	rpl1801	-	rpl18|rpl18-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882523	2539733	2539916	276285	276460	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC11G11.07	pab2	mtr10	-	SPBC18H10.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882524	2539733	2539773	276285	276324	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC14F5.08	pab2	med7	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882525	2539733	2539653	276285	276208	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC16E9.13	pab2	ksp1	-	ppk20	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882526	2539733	2539780	276285	276330	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC1711.06	pab2	rpl401	-	rpl4|rpl4-1|rpl4-2|rpl402	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882527	2539733	2540841	276285	277358	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC18H10.12c	pab2	rpl701	-	rpl7|rpl7-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882528	2539733	2540471	276285	276999	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC19F8.07	pab2	mcs6	-	cdk7|crk1|mop1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882529	2539733	2540609	276285	277135	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC19G7.03c	pab2	rps3002	-	rps30|rps30-2|ysprs30	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882530	2539733	2540796	276285	277315	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC1A4.07c	pab2	sof1	-	SPBC1A4.07c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882531	2539733	2540521	276285	277049	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC25H2.07	pab2	tif11	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882532	2539733	2540517	276285	277045	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC29A3.04	pab2	rpl8	-	rpl701|rpl7a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882533	2539733	2540367	276285	276896	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC29A3.12	pab2	rps902	-	rps9-2|rps9b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882534	2539733	2540950	276285	277466	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC365.03c	pab2	rpl2101	-	rpl21|rpl21-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882535	2539733	2540644	276285	277169	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC405.07	pab2	rpl3602	-	rpl36|rpl36-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882536	2539733	2539847	276285	276395	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC530.14c	pab2	dsk1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882537	2539733	2541099	276285	277614	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC646.04	pab2	pla1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882538	2539733	2541062	276285	277577	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC660.11	pab2	tcg1	-	mug187	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882539	2539733	2541172	276285	277686	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC776.01	pab2	rpl29	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882540	2539733	2541216	276285	277730	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC776.09	pab2	ste13	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882541	2539733	2541344	276285	277855	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBP8B7.03c	pab2	rpl402	-	rpl4|rpl4-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882542	2539733	2538892	276285	275470	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC1393.03	pab2	rps1501	-	rps15-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882543	2539733	2539137	276285	275709	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC1682.08c	pab2	mcp2	-	SPCC1682.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882544	2539733	2539186	276285	275757	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC16C4.13c	pab2	rpl1201	-	rpl12-1|rpl12.1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882545	2539733	2539315	276285	275881	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC1739.01	pab2	SPCC1739.01	-	SPCC1906.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882546	2539733	2538689	276285	275274	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC1795.11	pab2	sum3	-	ded1|moc2|slh3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882547	2539733	2539067	276285	275639	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC576.08c	pab2	rps2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882548	2539733	2539479	276285	276042	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC584.04	pab2	sup35	-	erf3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882549	2539733	2539548	276285	276109	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC5E4.07	pab2	rpl2802	-	rpl28|rpl28-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882550	2539733	2539372	276285	275938	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC622.18	pab2	rpl6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882551	2539733	2539035	276285	275608	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC794.09c	pab2	tef101	-	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882552	2539733	2538883	276285	275461	SPBC16E9.12c	SPCC970.05	pab2	rpl3601	-	rpl36-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemieux C (2009)	19336419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882553	2540580	2540084	277106	276622	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC119.11c	ran1	pac1	pat1	hcs|rnt1|snm1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Iino Y (1991)	1989884	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	pac1 overexpression rescues growth of ran1-3 and pat1-114 alleles	-	POMBASE
882695	2541720	2539207	278214	275777	SPAC23H3.13c	SPCC285.09c	gpa2	cgs2	git8	pde1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Isshiki T (1992)	1340462	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chemical compound accumulation	double mutants have increased levels of cAMP	-	POMBASE
882696	2539869	2540027	276415	276571	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC1734.14c	cdc2	suc1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	p13	Dosage Rescue	genetic	MacNeill SA (1991)	1896017	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	POMBASE
882697	2542632	2539869	279086	276415	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC11B10.09	cdc25	cdc2	sal2	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Grallert B (1991)	1934126	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:partial rescue	cdc2-3w partially suppresses meiotic defect of cdc25-22	-	POMBASE
882698	2539869	2540880	276415	277397	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC582.03	cdc2	cdc13	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Grallert B (1991)	1934126	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:undetermined	cdc13-c1 suppresses meiotic defects of cdc2-59	-	POMBASE
882699	2539442	2539641	276005	276196	SPCC5E4.04	SPBC14C8.01c	cut1	cut2	ptr4	SPBC1815.02c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Grallert B (1991)	1934126	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation	double mutant forms two-spored asci	-	BIOGRID
882700	2540574	2540887	277101	277404	SPBC409.03	SPBC4F6.15c	swi5	swi10	-	rad23	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Schmidt H (1989)	2598273	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|gamma ray resistance|vegetative growth	swi5-39 swi10-154 has increased sensitivity to UV and gamma-radiation	-	POMBASE
882702	2538760	2540574	275343	277101	SPCC970.01	SPBC409.03	rad16	swi5	rad10|rad20|swi9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Schmidt H (1989)	2598273	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|gamma ray resistance|vegetative growth	swi5-39 swi9-136 has increased sensitivity to UV and gamma-radiation	-	POMBASE
882787	2543441	2542635	279861	279089	SPAC821.12	SPAC24H6.09	orb6	gef1	-	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Das M (2009)	19646873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	POMBASE
882798	2543441	2542635	279861	279089	SPAC821.12	SPAC24H6.09	orb6	gef1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Das M (2009)	19646873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:partial rescue|cellular morphology:partial rescue|heat sensitivity:partial rescue|protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue	Deletion of gef1 ameliorated the increased cell diameter, abnormal cell morphology and the altered localization of CRIB-GFP phenotype of orb6 mutants	-	POMBASE
882799	2543441	2540593	279861	277119	SPAC821.12	SPBC28E12.03	orb6	rga4	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Das M (2009)	19646873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:partial rescue|cellular morphology:partial rescue|heat sensitivity:partial rescue|protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue	Overexpression of rga4 ameliorated the increased cell diameter, abnormal cell morphology and the altered localization of CRIB-GFP phenotype of orb6 mutants	-	POMBASE
882806	2543441	2540593	279861	277119	SPAC821.12	SPBC28E12.03	orb6	rga4	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Das M (2009)	19646873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology|heat sensitivity	Deletion of rga4 results in complete loss of cell polarity in an orb6 mutant at the semi-permissive temperature	-	POMBASE
882807	2542262	2541652	278731	278148	SPAC17C9.10	SPAC24B11.06c	stm1	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Chung KS (2007)	17346842	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of sty1 or gpa2 inhibits the growth retardation function of Stm1-overexpression	-	POMBASE
882808	2542262	2541720	278731	278214	SPAC17C9.10	SPAC23H3.13c	stm1	gpa2	-	git8	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Chung KS (2007)	17346842	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of sty1 or gpa2 inhibits the growth retardation function of Stm1-overexpression	-	POMBASE
882809	2539640	2540013	276195	276557	SPBC32F12.09	SPBC14C8.07c	rum1	cdc18	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Snaith HA (1999)	10388806	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in S phase:undetermined	mutation of the hit gene suppresses the re-replication triggered by rum1 overexpression	-	POMBASE
882810	2539640	2541849	276195	278340	SPBC32F12.09	SPAC20G8.01	rum1	cdc17	-	SPAC57A10.13c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Snaith HA (1999)	10388806	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in S phase:undetermined	mutation of the hit gene suppresses the re-replication triggered by rum1 overexpression	-	POMBASE
882811	2539640	2543281	276195	279708	SPBC32F12.09	SPAC23C4.18c	rum1	rad4	-	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Snaith HA (1999)	10388806	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in S phase:undetermined	mutation of the hit gene suppresses the re-replication triggered by rum1 overexpression	-	POMBASE
882812	2539640	2542083	276195	278560	SPBC32F12.09	SPAC27E2.05	rum1	cdc1	-	mis1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Snaith HA (1999)	10388806	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in S phase:undetermined	mutation of the hit gene suppresses the re-replication triggered by rum1 overexpression	-	POMBASE
882813	2539640	2543629	276195	280043	SPBC32F12.09	SPAC3H5.06c	rum1	pol1	-	polA|swi7	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Snaith HA (1999)	10388806	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in S phase:undetermined	mutation of the hit gene suppresses the re-replication triggered by rum1 overexpression	-	POMBASE
882814	2539640	2543407	276195	279829	SPBC32F12.09	SPAC8F11.07c	rum1	cdc24	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Snaith HA (1999)	10388806	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in S phase:undetermined	mutation of the hit gene suppresses the re-replication triggered by rum1 overexpression	-	POMBASE
882815	2539640	2539838	276195	276387	SPBC32F12.09	SPBC1347.10	rum1	cdc23	-	mcm10	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Snaith HA (1999)	10388806	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in S phase:undetermined	mutation of the hit gene suppresses the re-replication triggered by rum1 overexpression	-	POMBASE
882816	2539640	2540627	276195	277153	SPBC32F12.09	SPBC25H2.13c	rum1	cdc20	-	pol2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Snaith HA (1999)	10388806	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in S phase:undetermined	mutation of the hit gene suppresses the re-replication triggered by rum1 overexpression	-	POMBASE
882817	2539640	2540470	276195	276998	SPBC32F12.09	SPBC29A10.15	rum1	orc1	-	cdc30|orp1|rid1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Snaith HA (1999)	10388806	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in S phase:undetermined	mutation of the hit gene suppresses the re-replication triggered by rum1 overexpression	-	POMBASE
882818	2539640	2540255	276195	276786	SPBC32F12.09	SPBC336.04	rum1	cdc6	-	mis10|pol3|pold	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Snaith HA (1999)	10388806	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in S phase:undetermined	mutation of the hit gene suppresses the re-replication triggered by rum1 overexpression	-	POMBASE
882819	2539640	2540234	276195	276766	SPBC32F12.09	SPBC336.12c	rum1	cdc10	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Snaith HA (1999)	10388806	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in S phase:undetermined	mutation of the hit gene suppresses the re-replication triggered by rum1 overexpression	-	POMBASE
882820	2539640	2540620	276195	277146	SPBC32F12.09	SPBC4.04c	rum1	mcm2	-	cdc19|nda1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Snaith HA (1999)	10388806	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in S phase:undetermined	mutation of the hit gene suppresses the re-replication triggered by rum1 overexpression	-	POMBASE
882821	2539640	2539164	276195	275735	SPBC32F12.09	SPCC16A11.17	rum1	mcm4	-	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Snaith HA (1999)	10388806	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in S phase:undetermined	mutation of the hit gene suppresses the re-replication triggered by rum1 overexpression	-	POMBASE
882822	2539433	2539640	275996	276195	SPCC4E9.02	SPBC32F12.09	cig1	rum1	SPCC645.01	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Snaith HA (1999)	10388806	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression|cell shape	genetic complex|overexpression of rum1 in a cig1/cig2 double mutant causes cell cycle arrest	-	BIOGRID
882823	2542162	2541013	278638	277528	SPAC6F6.08c	SPBC3H7.13	cdc16	far10	bub2	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Singh NS (2011)	22119525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	csc1 cdc16-116	-	POMBASE
882825	2543666	2541652	280080	278148	SPAC644.06c	SPAC24B11.06c	cdr1	sty1	nim1	phh1|spc1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Navarro FJ (2012)	22624651	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show an increased cell length at the time of division	-	BIOGRID
882826	3361402	2539155	280478	275727	SPAPB17E12.06	SPCC1020.02	sos7	spc7	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Jakopec V (2012)	22711988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882827	2540494	3361402	277022	280478	SPBC409.04c	SPAPB17E12.06	mis12	sos7	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Jakopec V (2012)	22711988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	POMBASE
882828	2541324	2540627	277836	277153	SPBP23A10.09	SPBC25H2.13c	psf1	cdc20	-	pol2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pai CC (2009)	19109429	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	POMBASE
882829	2541324	2540255	277836	276786	SPBP23A10.09	SPBC336.04	psf1	cdc6	-	mis10|pol3|pold	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pai CC (2009)	19109429	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	POMBASE
882830	2541324	2540966	277836	277482	SPBP23A10.09	SPBC3D6.09	psf1	dpb4	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pai CC (2009)	19109429	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	POMBASE
882831	2543580	3361391	279995	280467	SPAC644.14c	SPAC13G6.01c	rad51	rad8	rhp51	SPAC5H10.14c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Frampton J (2006)	16641370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|gamma ray resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	POMBASE
882832	2543580	2538720	279995	275304	SPAC644.14c	SPCC338.05c	rad51	mms2	rhp51	spm2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Frampton J (2006)	16641370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|gamma ray resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	POMBASE
882833	2540020	2540719	276564	277242	SPBC16D10.09	SPBC216.05	pcn1	rad3	pcn	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Frampton J (2006)	16641370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	pcn1-K164R	-	BIOGRID
882834	2543580	2540020	279995	276564	SPAC644.14c	SPBC16D10.09	rad51	pcn1	rhp51	pcn	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Frampton J (2006)	16641370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|gamma ray resistance|vegetative growth	pcn1-K164R	-	BIOGRID
882836	2541869	2540283	278359	276814	SPAC22F3.13	SPBC1A4.02c	tsc1	leu1	-	SPBC1E8.07c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Matsumoto S (2002)	12136010	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	auxotrophy|vegetative growth	double mutant has decreased growth on leucine-supplemented (low concentration) minimal media|leu1-32 allele	-	POMBASE
882837	2543339	2540283	279762	276814	SPAC630.13c	SPBC1A4.02c	tsc2	leu1	-	SPBC1E8.07c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Matsumoto S (2002)	12136010	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	auxotrophy|vegetative growth	double mutant has decreased growth on leucine-supplemented (low concentration) minimal media|leu1-32 allele	-	POMBASE
882838	2541869	2538734	278359	275318	SPAC22F3.13	SPCC1322.13	tsc1	ade6	-	min1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Matsumoto S (2002)	12136010	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	auxotrophy|vegetative growth	ade6-210 allele|double mutant has decreased growth on adenine-supplemented (low concentration) minimal media	-	BIOGRID
882839	2543339	2538734	279762	275318	SPAC630.13c	SPCC1322.13	tsc2	ade6	-	min1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Matsumoto S (2002)	12136010	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	auxotrophy|vegetative growth	ade6-210 allele|double mutant has decreased growth on adenine-supplemented (low concentration) minimal media	-	BIOGRID
882840	2538724	2542285	275308	278753	SPCC1442.01	SPAC17H9.09c	ste6	ras1	SPCC1450.17	ste5	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Hughes DA (1990)	2107403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating response:partial rescue	expression of the ras1val17 mutant causes cell agglutination, the formation of long conjugation tubes and poor mating in the ste6 null background which usually shows no mating response	-	POMBASE
882841	2540620	2542477	277146	278937	SPBC4.04c	SPAC1B2.05	mcm2	mcm5	cdc19|nda1	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Adachi Y (1997)	9366552	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882842	2540620	2540784	277146	277303	SPBC4.04c	SPBC211.04c	mcm2	mcm6	cdc19|nda1	mis5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Adachi Y (1997)	9366552	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882843	2540620	2540630	277146	277156	SPBC4.04c	SPBC25D12.03c	mcm2	mcm7	cdc19|nda1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Adachi Y (1997)	9366552	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882844	2540620	2538838	277146	275419	SPBC4.04c	SPCC1682.02c	mcm2	mcm3	cdc19|nda1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Adachi Y (1997)	9366552	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882845	2540620	2539164	277146	275735	SPBC4.04c	SPCC16A11.17	mcm2	mcm4	cdc19|nda1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Adachi Y (1997)	9366552	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882846	2540620	2542477	277146	278937	SPBC4.04c	SPAC1B2.05	mcm2	mcm5	cdc19|nda1	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	Co-purification	physical	Adachi Y (1997)	9366552	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882847	2540620	2540784	277146	277303	SPBC4.04c	SPBC211.04c	mcm2	mcm6	cdc19|nda1	mis5	Co-purification	physical	Adachi Y (1997)	9366552	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882848	2540620	2540630	277146	277156	SPBC4.04c	SPBC25D12.03c	mcm2	mcm7	cdc19|nda1	-	Co-purification	physical	Adachi Y (1997)	9366552	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882849	2540620	2538838	277146	275419	SPBC4.04c	SPCC1682.02c	mcm2	mcm3	cdc19|nda1	-	Co-purification	physical	Adachi Y (1997)	9366552	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882850	2540620	2539164	277146	275735	SPBC4.04c	SPCC16A11.17	mcm2	mcm4	cdc19|nda1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Co-purification	physical	Adachi Y (1997)	9366552	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882851	2541165	2539399	277680	275964	SPBC776.12c	SPCC550.13	hsk1	dfp1	cdc7	him1|rad35|dbf4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Takeda T (1999)	10409743	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882852	2539087	2539399	275659	275964	SPCC1259.13	SPCC550.13	chk1	dfp1	rad27	him1|rad35|dbf4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Takeda T (1999)	10409743	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology|resistance to chemicals	double mutants give rise to small cut cells 2 hours after addition of HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423)	-	POMBASE
882853	2541987	2539634	278471	276190	SPAP27G11.04c	SPBC16D10.10	tad3	tad2	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Tsutsumi S (2007)	17875641	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	POMBASE
882854	2541987	2539634	278471	276190	SPAP27G11.04c	SPBC16D10.10	tad3	tad2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tsutsumi S (2007)	17875641	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882855	2540220	2540258	276753	276789	SPBC337.03	SPBC32C12.02	rhn1	ste11	SPBC337.03|iss4	aff1|stex	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sugiyama T (2012)	22912768	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:undetermined	expression of exogenous ste11 enhances the mating efficiency of an rhn1 mutant	-	POMBASE
882856	2542128	2542405	278604	278869	SPAC821.10c	SPAC32A11.03c	sod1	phx1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kwon ES (2006)	16299000	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	auxotrophy:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	POMBASE
882857	2539712	2542363	276265	278827	SPBC146.01	SPAC1783.05	med15	hrp1	SPBP35G2.15	chd1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Khorosjutina O (2010)	20622008	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	POMBASE
882858	2539123	2542677	275695	279130	SPCC18B5.03	SPAC26F1.10c	wee1	pyp1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Millar JB (1992)	1464319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue	disruption of pyp1 allows cell division in a wee1 mutant background	-	POMBASE
882860	2542632	2542200	279086	278675	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC19D5.01	cdc25	pyp2	sal2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Millar JB (1992)	1464319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression	overexpression of pyp2 and mutation of cdc25 causes increased cell cycle delay	-	POMBASE
882861	2543607	2542634	280022	279088	SPAC4F8.07c	SPAC24H6.04	hxk2	hxk1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Petit T (1998)	9790975	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	fermentative metabolism:partial rescue|nutrient utilization:partial rescue	mutation of hxk1 increases the rate of glucose fermentation in an hxk2 mutant	-	POMBASE
882862	2541089	2543339	277604	279762	SPBC646.09c	SPAC630.13c	int6	tsc2	yin6	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Matsumoto S (2002)	12136010	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient uptake	double mutant has enhanced uptake defect of leucine	-	BIOGRID
882863	2541089	2541869	277604	278359	SPBC646.09c	SPAC22F3.13	int6	tsc1	yin6	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Matsumoto S (2002)	12136010	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating response|nutrient uptake	double mutant displays conjugation defect|double mutant has enhanced uptake defect of leucine	-	BIOGRID
882932	2542007	2542440	278490	278902	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC17A2.12	rad57	rrp1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	SPAC17A2.12	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dziadkowiec D (2009)	19185548	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	gamma ray resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutant is sick on MMS, CPT, HU, and after exposure to gamma-rays	-	BIOGRID
882933	2542007	2540464	278490	276992	SPAC20H4.07	SPBC23E6.02	rad57	rrp2	rhp57|SPAC145.01	SPBC23E6.02	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dziadkowiec D (2009)	19185548	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	gamma ray resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutant is sick on MMS, CPT, HU, and after exposure to gamma-rays	-	BIOGRID
882934	2540784	2539164	277303	275735	SPBC211.04c	SPCC16A11.17	mcm6	mcm4	mis5	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Takahashi K (1994)	7865880	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	POMBASE
882935	2541889	2539205	278379	275775	SPAC2F7.03c	SPCC4B3.15	pom1	mid1	-	dmf1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Baehler J (1998)	9852154	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	POMBASE
882937	2541957	2539205	278444	275775	SPAC23C11.16	SPCC4B3.15	plo1	mid1	-	dmf1	Two-hybrid	physical	Baehler J (1998)	9852154	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882938	2542727	2542558	279177	279014	SPAC26A3.02	SPAC1952.07	myh1	rad1	myh	rad19	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Jansson K (2008)	18675827	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to HU (CID 3657 CHEBI 44423) and UV	-	POMBASE
882939	2542076	2540678	278553	277203	SPAC29A4.19c	SPBC1A4.10c	cta5	pmc1	-	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Furune T (2008)	19168988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutant shows decreased growth on media supplemented with CaCl2, amiodarone|double mutant shows defective growth under optimal conditions	-	BIOGRID
882940	2542076	2540383	278553	276912	SPAC29A4.19c	SPBC31E1.02c	cta5	pmr1	-	cps5|pgak2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Furune T (2008)	19168988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants display slow growth in Mn2+ depleted medium	-	BIOGRID
882941	2538749	2540383	275332	276912	SPCC1672.11c	SPBC31E1.02c	SPCC1672.11c	pmr1	-	cps5|pgak2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Furune T (2008)	19168988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants display slow growth in Mn2+ depleted medium	-	BIOGRID
882942	2542076	2540383	278553	276912	SPAC29A4.19c	SPBC31E1.02c	cta5	pmr1	-	cps5|pgak2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Furune T (2008)	19168988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	pmr1 overexpression rescues growth of pmc1 SPAC29A4.19c double mutant on CaCl2 supplemented media	-	BIOGRID
882943	2540678	2540383	277203	276912	SPBC1A4.10c	SPBC31E1.02c	pmc1	pmr1	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	cps5|pgak2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Furune T (2008)	19168988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	pmr1 overexpression rescues growth of pmc1 SPAC29A4.19c double mutant on CaCl2 supplemented media	-	BIOGRID
882944	2540383	2542076	276912	278553	SPBC31E1.02c	SPAC29A4.19c	pmr1	cta5	cps5|pgak2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Furune T (2008)	19168988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of cta5 partially rescues growth of pmr1 mutant in calcium-free medium	-	POMBASE
882945	2539930	2542824	276474	279271	SPBC1198.11c	SPAC144.13c	reb1	srw1	SPBC660.01c	ste9	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Rodriguez-Sanchez L (2010)	21118960	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in G1 phase:wild type	expression of SPAC144.13c rescues the G1 arrest seen in a reb1 null mutant	-	POMBASE
882946	2542523	2541627	278981	278123	SPAC18B11.04	SPAC1F5.08c	ncs1	yam8	-	ehs1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Hamasaki-Katagiri N (2010)	20018864	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	yam8 deletion rescues growth of ncs1 mutant on media with CaCl2	-	POMBASE
882947	2542523	2541627	278981	278123	SPAC18B11.04	SPAC1F5.08c	ncs1	yam8	-	ehs1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Hamasaki-Katagiri N (2010)	20018864	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882948	2542140	2540329	278616	276859	SPAC1783.07c	SPBC29B5.01	pap1	atf1	caf3	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Toone WM (1998)	9585505	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals	double mutants show sensitivity to UV and cisplatin (CHEBI:27899)	-	POMBASE
882949	2542796	2539087	279244	275659	SPAC1687.04	SPCC1259.13	mcb1	chk1	-	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Li JJ (2011)	22036784	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	POMBASE
882950	2541633	2542788	278129	279237	SPAC664.01c	SPAC15A10.15	swi6	sgo2	SPAC824.10c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yamagishi Y (2010)	20929775	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	POMBASE
882951	2541959	2542788	278446	279237	SPAC23C4.03	SPAC15A10.15	hrk1	sgo2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yamagishi Y (2010)	20929775	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	POMBASE
882952	2541959	2542467	278446	278928	SPAC23C4.03	SPAC1834.04	hrk1	hht1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Yamagishi Y (2010)	20929775	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
882956	2541959	2538736	278446	275320	SPAC23C4.03	SPCC1322.12c	hrk1	bub1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yamagishi Y (2010)	20929775	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	POMBASE
882959	2542788	2541628	279237	278124	SPAC15A10.15	SPAC110.02	sgo2	pds5	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Yamagishi Y (2010)	20929775	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882960	2542788	2541633	279237	278129	SPAC15A10.15	SPAC664.01c	sgo2	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Two-hybrid	physical	Yamagishi Y (2010)	20929775	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882961	2541628	2538736	278124	275320	SPAC110.02	SPCC1322.12c	pds5	bub1	-	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Yamagishi Y (2010)	20929775	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	POMBASE
882962	2541628	2542788	278124	279237	SPAC110.02	SPAC15A10.15	pds5	sgo2	-	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Yamagishi Y (2010)	20929775	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	POMBASE
882963	2541959	2538875	278446	275454	SPAC23C4.03	SPCC962.02c	hrk1	bir1	-	SPCP31B10.10c|cut17|pbh1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yamagishi Y (2010)	20929775	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882964	2542467	2538875	278928	275454	SPAC1834.04	SPCC962.02c	hht1	bir1	-	SPCP31B10.10c|cut17|pbh1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yamagishi Y (2010)	20929775	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882965	2541220	2538875	277734	275454	SPBC8D2.04	SPCC962.02c	hht2	bir1	h3.2	SPCP31B10.10c|cut17|pbh1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yamagishi Y (2010)	20929775	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882966	2539804	2538875	276354	275454	SPBC1105.11c	SPCC962.02c	hht3	bir1	h3.3	SPCP31B10.10c|cut17|pbh1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yamagishi Y (2010)	20929775	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
882967	2540660	2542761	277185	279211	SPBC21.06c	SPAC1565.06c	cdc7	spg1	its10|pld1	sid3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Schmidt S (1997)	9203579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
882968	2543281	2543310	279708	279734	SPAC23C4.18c	SPAC6B12.11	rad4	drc1	cut5|dpb11|dre3	sld2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Noguchi E (2002)	11937031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	A multicopy plasmid that contained drc1+ partially rescued the cut5-T401 temperature-sensitive phenotype	-	POMBASE
882969	2542761	2539149	279211	275721	SPAC1565.06c	SPCC1739.11c	spg1	cdc11	sid3	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Schmidt S (1997)	9203579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	POMBASE
882970	2542761	2540624	279211	277150	SPAC1565.06c	SPBC24C6.07	spg1	cdc14	sid3	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Schmidt S (1997)	9203579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	POMBASE
882971	2542761	2541975	279211	278460	SPAC1565.06c	SPAC20G8.05c	spg1	cdc15	sid3	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Schmidt S (1997)	9203579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	POMBASE
882972	3361532	2539847	280608	276395	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC530.14c	lkh1	dsk1	kic1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tang Z (2011)	21745468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	POMBASE
882973	2542162	2542761	278638	279211	SPAC6F6.08c	SPAC1565.06c	cdc16	spg1	bub2	sid3	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Schmidt S (1997)	9203579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	POMBASE
882974	2542761	2540660	279211	277185	SPAC1565.06c	SPBC21.06c	spg1	cdc7	sid3	its10|pld1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Schmidt S (1997)	9203579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	POMBASE
882975	2540939	2539568	277455	276128	SPBC4.07c	SPCC663.05c	rpt2	cia1	mts2	asf1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Matsuo Y (2011)	21324894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	POMBASE
882976	2540083	2539568	276621	276128	SPBC119.02	SPCC663.05c	ubc4	cia1	-	asf1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Matsuo Y (2011)	21324894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	POMBASE
882977	2539568	2540083	276128	276621	SPCC663.05c	SPBC119.02	cia1	ubc4	asf1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Matsuo Y (2011)	21324894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:undetermined	the instability of the asf1-30 gene was suppressed by ubc4 and san1 mutants	-	POMBASE
882978	2539568	2540480	276128	277008	SPCC663.05c	SPBC2A9.04c	cia1	san1	asf1	SPBC2A9.04c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Matsuo Y (2011)	21324894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:undetermined	the instability of the asf1-30 gene was suppressed by ubc4 and san1 mutants	-	POMBASE
882979	2542632	2541055	279086	277570	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC409.07c	cdc25	wis1	sal2	smf2|spc2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kato T (1996)	8557102	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	POMBASE
882980	2542632	2541652	279086	278148	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC24B11.06c	cdc25	sty1	sal2	phh1|spc1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kato T (1996)	8557102	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	-	-	POMBASE
882981	2541055	2541652	277570	278148	SPBC409.07c	SPAC24B11.06c	wis1	sty1	smf2|spc2	phh1|spc1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kato T (1996)	8557102	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	stress resistance:undetermined	Delta-wisl cells with the h90 homothalic background were significantly more resistant to stress, particularly in the presence of phhl overexpression	-	POMBASE
882982	2542137	2541055	278613	277570	SPAC1D4.13	SPBC409.07c	byr1	wis1	ste1|ste3	smf2|spc2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kato T (1996)	8557102	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	stress resistance|vegetative growth	-	-	POMBASE
882983	2541652	2540258	278148	276789	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC32C12.02	sty1	ste11	phh1|spc1	aff1|stex	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kato T (1996)	8557102	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:undetermined	constitutive expression of ste11 partially restores mating efficiency to a sty1 mutant	-	POMBASE
882984	2539781	2542029	276331	278511	SPBC106.10	SPAC8E11.02c	pka1	rad24	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	anr5|sam4	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Oowatari Y (2009)	19584544	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of rad24 or rad25 suppresses the KCl sensitivity	-	POMBASE
882985	2539781	2542252	276331	278722	SPBC106.10	SPAC17A2.13c	pka1	rad25	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Oowatari Y (2009)	19584544	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of rad24 or rad25 suppresses the KCl sensitivity	-	POMBASE
883083	2541456	2539892	277959	276438	SPAC6G9.04	SPBC1347.03	spo7	meu14	mug79	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nakamura-Kubo M (2011)	21775631	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
883084	2541456	2539892	277959	276438	SPAC6G9.04	SPBC1347.03	spo7	meu14	mug79	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Nakamura-Kubo M (2011)	21775631	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
883085	2541456	2541456	277959	277959	SPAC6G9.04	SPAC6G9.04	spo7	spo7	mug79	mug79	Two-hybrid	physical	Nakamura-Kubo M (2011)	21775631	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	supp figure s2c	-	POMBASE
883086	2541456	9407039	277959	1028402	SPAC6G9.04	SPCC1183.12	spo7	spo13	mug79	SPNGAF60|SPNCRNA.546	Two-hybrid	physical	Nakamura-Kubo M (2011)	21775631	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	supp figure s2c	-	POMBASE
883087	2539093	2539093	275665	275665	SPCC736.15	SPCC736.15	pil1	pil1	SPCC736.15	SPCC736.15	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kabeche R (2011)	21900489	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	forms filaments	-	POMBASE
883088	2542761	2542162	279211	278638	SPAC1565.06c	SPAC6F6.08c	spg1	cdc16	sid3	bub2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Schmidt S (1997)	9203579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	POMBASE
883089	2541606	2541606	278103	278103	SPAC11H11.04	SPAC11H11.04	mam2	mam2	-	-	PCA	physical	Ladds G (2005)	15659165	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	G-protein-coupled receptor oligomerization	-	POMBASE
883090	2541606	2540414	278103	276942	SPAC11H11.04	SPBC24C6.06	mam2	gpa1	-	-	PCA	physical	Ladds G (2005)	15659165	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	G-protein-coupled receptor oligomerization	-	POMBASE
883091	2539751	2538743	276303	275326	SPBC13G1.02	SPCC1906.01	mpg2	mpg1	SPBC13G1.02	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Munoz-Centeno MC (2012)	22416758	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	POMBASE
883092	2539641	2539442	276196	276005	SPBC14C8.01c	SPCC5E4.04	cut2	cut1	SPBC1815.02c	ptr4	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Uzawa S (1990)	2203537	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	overexpression of cut1 can rescue ts phenotype of cut2-364 mutant	-	BIOGRID
883101	2539123	2541055	275695	277570	SPCC18B5.03	SPBC409.07c	wee1	wis1	-	smf2|spc2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Warbrick E (1991)	1756736	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	wis1 overexpression rescues temperature-sensitivity of wee1-50 cdc25-22 win1-1 triple mutant	-	BIOGRID
883102	2542632	2541055	279086	277570	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC409.07c	cdc25	wis1	sal2	smf2|spc2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Warbrick E (1991)	1756736	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	wis1 overexpression rescues temperature-sensitivity of wee1-50 cdc25-22 win1-1 triple mutant	-	BIOGRID
883103	2542988	2541055	279426	277570	SPAC1006.09	SPBC409.07c	win1	wis1	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	smf2|spc2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Warbrick E (1991)	1756736	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	wis1 overexpression rescues temperature-sensitivity of wee1-50 cdc25-22 win1-1 triple mutant	-	BIOGRID
883108	2542262	2541720	278731	278214	SPAC17C9.10	SPAC23H3.13c	stm1	gpa2	-	git8	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chung KS (2001)	11461899	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:undetermined|meiosis:undetermined	stm1 overexpression caused an induction of transcripts required for meiosis initiation in gpa2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
883109	2542262	2541652	278731	278148	SPAC17C9.10	SPAC24B11.06c	stm1	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chung KS (2001)	11461899	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type|meiosis:wild type	sty1 mutant reversed induction of ste11 transcript in stm1 overexpression mutant	-	POMBASE
883188	2540617	2540810	277143	277329	SPBC21C3.20c	SPBC19C7.03	git1	cyr1	-	git2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Hoffman CS (1991)	1849107	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	high copy git2 rescues Git- (glucose-insensitive transcription) phenotype	-	POMBASE
883189	2538770	2540810	275353	277329	SPCC1753.02c	SPBC19C7.03	git3	cyr1	-	git2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Hoffman CS (1991)	1849107	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	high copy git2 rescues Git- (glucose-insensitive transcription) phenotype	-	POMBASE
883190	2539974	2540810	276518	277329	SPBC32H8.07	SPBC19C7.03	git5	cyr1	gpb1	git2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Hoffman CS (1991)	1849107	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	high copy git2 rescues Git- (glucose-insensitive transcription) phenotype	-	POMBASE
883191	2540962	2540810	277478	277329	SPBC36.12c	SPBC19C7.03	git7	cyr1	SPBC713.01c	git2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Hoffman CS (1991)	1849107	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	high copy git2 rescues Git- (glucose-insensitive transcription) phenotype	-	POMBASE
883192	2541720	2540810	278214	277329	SPAC23H3.13c	SPBC19C7.03	gpa2	cyr1	git8	git2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Hoffman CS (1991)	1849107	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	high copy git2 rescues Git- (glucose-insensitive transcription) phenotype	-	POMBASE
883193	2543539	2540810	279956	277329	SPAC926.04c	SPBC19C7.03	hsp90	cyr1	git10|swo1	git2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Hoffman CS (1991)	1849107	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	high copy git2 rescues Git- (glucose-insensitive transcription) phenotype	-	POMBASE
883200	2539869	2540880	276415	277397	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC582.03	cdc2	cdc13	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Booher RN (1989)	2569363	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883201	2539869	3009	276415	109264	SPBC11B10.09	-	cdc2	HIST1H1B	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	H1|H1.5|H1B|H1F5|H1s-3	Biochemical Activity	physical	Booher RN (1989)	2569363	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	Histone H1 source not clear	-	BIOGRID
883434	2540880	2541159	277397	277674	SPBC582.03	SPBC685.09	cdc13	orc2	-	orp2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Leatherwood J (1996)	8552194	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size|mitotic cell cycle	-	-	POMBASE
883435	2539869	2541159	276415	277674	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC685.09	cdc2	orc2	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	orp2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Leatherwood J (1996)	8552194	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size|mitotic cell cycle	-	-	POMBASE
883499	2540027	2539869	276571	276415	SPBC1734.14c	SPBC11B10.09	suc1	cdc2	p13	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Booher RN (1989)	2569363	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
883500	2540880	2539869	277397	276415	SPBC582.03	SPBC11B10.09	cdc13	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Co-fractionation	physical	Booher RN (1989)	2569363	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
883511	2543666	2539016	280080	275589	SPAC644.06c	SPCC970.04c	cdr1	mob2	nim1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883512	2543666	2540468	280080	276996	SPAC644.06c	SPBC23G7.04c	cdr1	nif1	nim1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883513	2543666	2540099	280080	276637	SPAC644.06c	SPBC16H5.11c	cdr1	skb1	nim1	rmt5	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883514	2543666	2539123	280080	275695	SPAC644.06c	SPCC18B5.03	cdr1	wee1	nim1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883515	2539016	2543441	275589	279861	SPCC970.04c	SPAC821.12	mob2	orb6	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883516	2541317	2541317	277829	277829	SPBP19A11.04c	SPBP19A11.04c	mor2	mor2	cps12	cps12	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883517	2541317	2541889	277829	278379	SPBP19A11.04c	SPAC2F7.03c	mor2	pom1	cps12	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883518	2539963	2542388	276507	278852	SPBC17F3.02	SPAC1834.06c	nak1	pmo25	mor4|orb3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883519	2543441	2539016	279861	275589	SPAC821.12	SPCC970.04c	orb6	mob2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883520	2543441	2541317	279861	277829	SPAC821.12	SPBP19A11.04c	orb6	mor2	-	cps12	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883521	2543441	2543441	279861	279861	SPAC821.12	SPAC821.12	orb6	orb6	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883522	2539997	2539997	276541	276541	SPBC1604.14c	SPBC1604.14c	shk1	shk1	orb2|pak1	orb2|pak1	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883523	2539997	2541726	276541	278220	SPBC1604.14c	SPAC22H10.07	shk1	scd2	orb2|pak1	ral3	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883524	2539997	2540099	276541	276637	SPBC1604.14c	SPBC16H5.11c	shk1	skb1	orb2|pak1	rmt5	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883525	2539997	2539237	276541	275807	SPBC1604.14c	SPCC24B10.13	shk1	skb5	orb2|pak1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883526	2542388	2541317	278852	277829	SPAC1834.06c	SPBP19A11.04c	pmo25	mor2	-	cps12	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883527	2541889	2540593	278379	277119	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC28E12.03	pom1	rga4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883528	2543100	2540099	279532	276637	SPAC12B10.14c	SPBC16H5.11c	tea5	skb1	ppk2	rmt5	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883529	2542326	2541317	278792	277829	SPAC16C9.07	SPBP19A11.04c	pom2	mor2	SPAC2G11.01|mug189|ppk5	cps12	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883530	2542326	2540593	278792	277119	SPAC16C9.07	SPBC28E12.03	pom2	rga4	SPAC2G11.01|mug189|ppk5	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883531	2539495	2539237	276058	275807	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC24B10.13	ptc1	skb5	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883532	2540593	2541889	277119	278379	SPBC28E12.03	SPAC2F7.03c	rga4	pom1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883533	2542337	2543027	278803	279463	SPAC16E8.09	SPAC110.03	scd1	cdc42	ral1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883534	2542337	2541726	278803	278220	SPAC16E8.09	SPAC22H10.07	scd1	scd2	ral1	ral3	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883535	2541726	2539997	278220	276541	SPAC22H10.07	SPBC1604.14c	scd2	shk1	ral3	orb2|pak1	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883536	2541726	2543100	278220	279532	SPAC22H10.07	SPAC12B10.14c	scd2	tea5	ral3	ppk2	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883537	2540099	2539997	276637	276541	SPBC16H5.11c	SPBC1604.14c	skb1	shk1	rmt5	orb2|pak1	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883538	2540099	2543100	276637	279532	SPBC16H5.11c	SPAC12B10.14c	skb1	tea5	rmt5	ppk2	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883539	2540099	2542326	276637	278792	SPBC16H5.11c	SPAC16C9.07	skb1	pom2	rmt5	SPAC2G11.01|mug189|ppk5	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883540	2539047	2539047	275620	275620	SPCC1223.06	SPCC1223.06	tea1	tea1	alp8	alp8	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883541	2539047	2539642	275620	276197	SPCC1223.06	SPBC1706.01	tea1	tea4	alp8	wsh3	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883542	2539047	2543044	275620	279479	SPCC1223.06	SPAC3C7.12	tea1	tip1	alp8	noc1	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883543	2539047	2541889	275620	278379	SPCC1223.06	SPAC2F7.03c	tea1	pom1	alp8	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883544	2539857	2539857	276404	276404	SPBC1604.20c	SPBC1604.20c	tea2	tea2	klp4	klp4	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
883545	2539857	2543044	276404	279479	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC3C7.12	tea2	tip1	klp4	noc1	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2013)	23615447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
884888	2542162	2539149	278638	275721	SPAC6F6.08c	SPCC1739.11c	cdc16	cdc11	bub2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bajpai A (2013)	23874188	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth|vegetative growth	At 32oC cdc11-S8A can partially compensate effects of the temperature sensitive cdc16-116 mutation, while cdc11-S5A makes it even more severe.	-	BIOGRID
884889	2542162	2539149	278638	275721	SPAC6F6.08c	SPCC1739.11c	cdc16	cdc11	bub2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Bajpai A (2013)	23874188	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth	At 32oC cdc11-S8A can partially compensate effects of the temperature sensitive cdc16-116 mutation, while cdc11-S5A makes it even more severe.	-	BIOGRID
884890	2542856	5802974	279302	858112	SPAC6F12.11c	SPAC1250.07	sfc1	sfc7	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Taylor NM (2013)	23921640	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
884920	2541472	2539814	277974	276364	SPAC589.11	SPBC1105.18c	pth4	pth3	mug82	SPBC1105.18c|SPBC887.21c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dujeancourt L (2013)	23892058	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	respiratory growth|vegetative growth	double deletion showed a clear reduction in respiratory growth	-	BIOGRID
884921	2541478	2541472	277980	277974	SPAC2F7.17	SPAC589.11	mrf1	pth4	SPAC2F7.17	mug82	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Dujeancourt L (2013)	23892058	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	when the pth4D and mrf1D strains were crossed, no viable double mutants were obtained	-	BIOGRID
884922	2541478	2541472	277980	277974	SPAC2F7.17	SPAC589.11	mrf1	pth4	SPAC2F7.17	mug82	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Dujeancourt L (2013)	23892058	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	respiratory growth	over-expression of pth4 significantly improves the respiratory growth of the mrf1D strain	-	BIOGRID
884923	2541472	11222	277974	116390	SPAC589.11	-	pth4	MRPL3	mug82	COXPD9|MRL3|RPML3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dujeancourt L (2013)	23892058	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
884924	2541472	6182	277974	112097	SPAC589.11	-	pth4	MRPL12	mug82	5c5-2|L12mt|MRP-L31/34|MRPL7|MRPL7/L12|RPML12	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dujeancourt L (2013)	23892058	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
884925	2541472	7818	277974	113587	SPAC589.11	-	pth4	DAP3	mug82	DAP-3|MRP-S29|MRPS29|bMRP-10	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dujeancourt L (2013)	23892058	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
884926	2541472	28973	277974	118797	SPAC589.11	DADB-129D20.6	pth4	MRPS18B	mug82	C6orf14|HSPC183|HumanS18a|MRP-S18-2|MRPS18-2|PTD017|S18amt	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dujeancourt L (2013)	23892058	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
884931	2541472	7818	277974	113587	SPAC589.11	-	pth4	DAP3	mug82	DAP-3|MRP-S29|MRPS29|bMRP-10	Co-fractionation	physical	Dujeancourt L (2013)	23892058	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
884932	2543029	2541612	279465	278109	SPAC11G7.01	SPAC1F7.04	SPAC11G7.01	rho1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cruz S (2013)	23907979	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Csp hypersensitive growth phenotype of mtl2D mutants is suppressed by overexpression of rho1, rgf1, rgf2, pck1, and wsc1	-	BIOGRID
884933	2543029	2539580	279465	276139	SPAC11G7.01	SPCC645.07	SPAC11G7.01	rgf1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cruz S (2013)	23907979	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Csp hypersensitive growth phenotype of mtl2D mutants is suppressed by overexpression of rho1, rgf1, rgf2, pck1, and wsc1	-	BIOGRID
884934	2543029	2542953	279465	279393	SPAC11G7.01	SPAC1006.06	SPAC11G7.01	rgf2	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cruz S (2013)	23907979	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Csp hypersensitive growth phenotype of mtl2D mutants is suppressed by overexpression of rho1, rgf1, rgf2, pck1, and wsc1	-	BIOGRID
884935	2543029	2542293	279465	278761	SPAC11G7.01	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC11G7.01	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cruz S (2013)	23907979	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Csp hypersensitive growth phenotype of mtl2D mutants is suppressed by overexpression of rho1, rgf1, rgf2, pck1, and wsc1	-	BIOGRID
884936	2543029	2540969	279465	277485	SPAC11G7.01	SPBC30B4.01c	SPAC11G7.01	wsc1	-	SPBC3D6.14c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cruz S (2013)	23907979	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Csp hypersensitive growth phenotype of mtl2D mutants is suppressed by overexpression of rho1, rgf1, rgf2, pck1, and wsc1	-	BIOGRID
884937	2542953	2540969	279393	277485	SPAC1006.06	SPBC30B4.01c	rgf2	wsc1	-	SPBC3D6.14c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Cruz S (2013)	23907979	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
884949	2541605	2540821	278102	277339	SPAC1F7.01c	SPBC800.03	spt6	clr3	SPAC694.07c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kato H (2013)	23851719	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution|silencing	spt6-K20 clr3 double mutant displays enhanced defects in heterochromatin marks in pericentromeric regions via ChIP	-	BIOGRID
884952	2542004	2543382	278487	279804	SPAC27F1.04c	SPAC890.02c	nuf2	alp7	-	mia1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kakui Y (2013)	23770679	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
884953	2541957	2543382	278444	279804	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC890.02c	plo1	alp7	-	mia1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kakui Y (2013)	23770679	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
884954	2543382	2539497	279804	276060	SPAC890.02c	SPCC895.07	alp7	alp14	mia1	mtc1	Two-hybrid	physical	Kakui Y (2013)	23770679	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
884955	2543382	2539497	279804	276060	SPAC890.02c	SPCC895.07	alp7	alp14	mia1	mtc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kakui Y (2013)	23770679	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
884956	2542765	2539338	279215	275904	SPAC15E1.08	SPCC338.07c	naa10	naa15	ard1	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Liszczak G (2013)	23912279	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	also acetyl coA in the complex	-	BIOGRID
884957	2540825	2542467	277343	278928	SPBC428.08c	SPAC1834.04	clr4	hht1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Al-Sady B (2013)	23849629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Methylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
884958	2540392	2540690	276920	277215	SPBC365.15	SPBC428.20c	alp4	alp6	-	SPBC902.01c	Co-fractionation	physical	Riehlman TD (2013)	23886939	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
884960	2540392	10426	276920	115695	SPBC365.15	RP11-480K16.2	alp4	TUBGCP3	-	104p|GCP3|Grip104|SPBC98|Spc98|Spc98p	Co-fractionation	physical	Riehlman TD (2013)	23886939	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
884961	2540392	10844	276920	116055	SPBC365.15	-	alp4	TUBGCP2	-	GCP-2|GCP2|Grip103|SPBC97|Spc97p|h103p|hGCP2|hSpc97	Co-fractionation	physical	Riehlman TD (2013)	23886939	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
884962	2540690	10426	277215	115695	SPBC428.20c	RP11-480K16.2	alp6	TUBGCP3	SPBC902.01c	104p|GCP3|Grip104|SPBC98|Spc98|Spc98p	Co-fractionation	physical	Riehlman TD (2013)	23886939	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
884963	2540690	10844	277215	116055	SPBC428.20c	-	alp6	TUBGCP2	SPBC902.01c	GCP-2|GCP2|Grip103|SPBC97|Spc97p|h103p|hGCP2|hSpc97	Co-fractionation	physical	Riehlman TD (2013)	23886939	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
885375	3361036	3361470	280112	280546	SPCC320.13c	SPAC3G9.01	ark1	nsk1	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Chen JS (2011)	22065639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	nsk1 deletion rescues growth of ark1-T7 at 29 degrees	-	BIOGRID
885376	2541058	2543113	277573	279545	SPBC3H7.09	SPAC3F10.07c	erf2	erf4	mug142	mug91	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Zhang MM (2013)	23843742	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis|protein/peptide modification	overexpression of both erf2/erf4 causes an increase in Rho3 palmitoyltransferase and aberrant initiation of meiosis	-	BIOGRID
885377	2541058	3361511	277573	280587	SPBC3H7.09	SPAC23C4.08	erf2	rho3	mug142	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Zhang MM (2013)	23843742	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis	deletion of rho3 inhibits the aberrant meiosis induced by overexpression of both erf2/erf4|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
885378	2543113	3361511	279545	280587	SPAC3F10.07c	SPAC23C4.08	erf4	rho3	mug91	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Zhang MM (2013)	23843742	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis	deletion of rho3 inhibits the aberrant meiosis induced by overexpression of both erf2/erf4|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
885679	2540338	2541071	276867	277586	SPBC2G2.13c	SPBC582.05c	dcd1	brc1	SPBC2G2.13c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sanchez A (2012)	22927644	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency	double mutants show increased mutation rates	-	BIOGRID
885680	2540338	2542207	276867	278682	SPBC2G2.13c	SPAC17H9.10c	dcd1	ddb1	SPBC2G2.13c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sanchez A (2012)	22927644	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|resistance to chemicals	double mutants show increased sensitivity to DNA damaging agents	-	BIOGRID
885681	2540338	2542558	276867	279014	SPBC2G2.13c	SPAC1952.07	dcd1	rad1	SPBC2G2.13c	rad19	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sanchez A (2012)	22927644	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|resistance to chemicals	double mutants show increased sensitivity to DNA damaging agents	-	BIOGRID
885682	2540338	2543240	276867	279668	SPBC2G2.13c	SPAC694.06c	dcd1	mrc1	SPBC2G2.13c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sanchez A (2012)	22927644	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|resistance to chemicals	double mutants show increased sensitivity to DNA damaging agents	-	BIOGRID
885683	2540338	2538959	276867	275533	SPBC2G2.13c	SPCC18B5.11c	dcd1	cds1	SPBC2G2.13c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sanchez A (2012)	22927644	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|resistance to chemicals	double mutants show increased sensitivity to DNA damaging agents	-	BIOGRID
885684	2540338	2540719	276867	277242	SPBC2G2.13c	SPBC216.05	dcd1	rad3	SPBC2G2.13c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sanchez A (2012)	22927644	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable|resistance to chemicals	double mutants show increased sensitivity to DNA damaging agents	-	BIOGRID
885685	2540338	2538706	276867	275290	SPBC2G2.13c	SPCC338.08	dcd1	ctp1	SPBC2G2.13c	mug38|nip1|slr9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2012)	22927644	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to DNA damaging agents	-	BIOGRID
885686	2540338	2543580	276867	279995	SPBC2G2.13c	SPAC644.14c	dcd1	rad51	SPBC2G2.13c	rhp51	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2012)	22927644	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to DNA damaging agents	-	BIOGRID
885687	2540338	2539004	276867	275578	SPBC2G2.13c	SPCC4G3.05c	dcd1	mus81	SPBC2G2.13c	slx3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2012)	22927644	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to DNA damaging agents	-	BIOGRID
885688	2540338	2540911	276867	277427	SPBC2G2.13c	SPBC651.10	dcd1	nse5	SPBC2G2.13c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2012)	22927644	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to DNA damaging agents	-	BIOGRID
885689	2540338	2540728	276867	277251	SPBC2G2.13c	SPBC216.06c	dcd1	swi1	SPBC2G2.13c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2012)	22927644	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to DNA damaging agents	-	BIOGRID
885690	2540338	2538775	276867	275357	SPBC2G2.13c	SPCC23B6.05c	dcd1	ssb3	SPBC2G2.13c	rpa3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2012)	22927644	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to DNA damaging agents	-	BIOGRID
885691	2540338	2538959	276867	275533	SPBC2G2.13c	SPCC18B5.11c	dcd1	cds1	SPBC2G2.13c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2012)	22927644	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to DNA damaging agents	-	BIOGRID
885692	2540338	2539087	276867	275659	SPBC2G2.13c	SPCC1259.13	dcd1	chk1	SPBC2G2.13c	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2012)	22927644	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to DNA damaging agents	-	BIOGRID
885693	2540338	2541071	276867	277586	SPBC2G2.13c	SPBC582.05c	dcd1	brc1	SPBC2G2.13c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2012)	22927644	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to DNA damaging agents	-	BIOGRID
885782	2540618	2541580	277144	278077	SPBC3D6.11c	SPAC1687.05	slx8	pli1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Steinacher R (2013)	23936535	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue|heat sensitivity:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	pli1 deletion suppresses the variety of phenotypes caused by an slx8 mutation	-	BIOGRID
885783	2540618	2541580	277144	278077	SPBC3D6.11c	SPAC1687.05	slx8	pli1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Steinacher R (2013)	23936535	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:partial rescue	pli1 deletion suppresses chromosome segregation defects caused by an slx8 mutation	-	BIOGRID
885784	2540618	2542312	277144	278778	SPBC3D6.11c	SPAC16A10.06c	slx8	nse2	-	pli2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Steinacher R (2013)	23936535	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	nse2-SA allele; double mutant shows enhanced growth defect and hypersensitivity to genotoxic agents MMS (CHEBI:25255), HU (CHEBI:44423), and camptothecin (CHEBI:27656)	-	BIOGRID
885788	2541612	2539920	278109	276464	SPAC1F7.04	SPBC119.08	rho1	pmk1	-	spm1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Viana RA (2013)	23934882	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|temperature sensitive growth|vegetative growth:partial rescue	rho1-596 pmk1D double mutant strain. This strain was able to grow even at 35oC, implying that lack of Pmk1 improves rho1-596 survival	-	BIOGRID
885789	2541612	2542773	278109	279222	SPAC1F7.04	SPAC16.01	rho1	rho2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Viana RA (2013)	23934882	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|temperature sensitive growth|temperature sensitive growth:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Elimination of Rho2 improved the growth of rho1- 596 mutant strain at 32oC and 34oC	-	BIOGRID
885803	2541580	2540032	278077	276575	SPAC1687.05	SPBC1703.14c	pli1	top1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Steinacher R (2013)	23936535	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic recombination:wild type	suppression of elevated level of spontaneous recombination	-	BIOGRID
886203	2540530	2540814	277058	277333	SPBC405.05	SPBC4B4.10c	atg16	atg5	SPBC405.05	mug77	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sun LL (2013)	23950735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
886207	3361548	2541691	280624	278187	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC25A8.02	atg6	atg14	SPAC3A12.01c	SPAC25A8.02	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sun LL (2013)	23950735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
886208	2542180	2540814	278655	277333	SPAC589.07c	SPBC4B4.10c	atg1801	atg5	atg18|atg18a	mug77	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sun LL (2013)	23950735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
886209	2540814	2542180	277333	278655	SPBC4B4.10c	SPAC589.07c	atg5	atg1801	mug77	atg18|atg18a	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sun LL (2013)	23950735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
886210	2541386	2541025	277897	277540	SPBP8B7.24c	SPBC3B9.06c	atg8	atg3	-	apg3	Co-localization	physical	Sun LL (2013)	23950735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	co-localization was at PAS-like site; deletion of Atg8 disrupted localization	-	BIOGRID
886211	2541386	2542182	277897	278657	SPBP8B7.24c	SPAC19B12.08	atg8	atg4	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Sun LL (2013)	23950735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	co-localization was at PAS-like site; deletion of Atg8 disrupted localization	-	BIOGRID
886212	2541386	2540814	277897	277333	SPBP8B7.24c	SPBC4B4.10c	atg8	atg5	-	mug77	Co-localization	physical	Sun LL (2013)	23950735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	co-localization was at PAS-like site; deletion of Atg8 disrupted localization	-	BIOGRID
886213	2541386	2540790	277897	277309	SPBP8B7.24c	SPBC6B1.05c	atg8	atg7	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Sun LL (2013)	23950735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	co-localization was at PAS-like site; deletion of Atg8 disrupted localization	-	BIOGRID
886214	2541386	2541913	277897	278403	SPBP8B7.24c	SPAC227.04	atg8	atg10	-	SPAC227.04	Co-localization	physical	Sun LL (2013)	23950735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	co-localization was at PAS-like site; deletion of Atg8 disrupted localization	-	BIOGRID
886215	2541386	2542368	277897	278832	SPBP8B7.24c	SPAC1783.06c	atg8	atg12	-	apg12	Co-localization	physical	Sun LL (2013)	23950735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	co-localization was at PAS-like site; deletion of Atg8 disrupted localization	-	BIOGRID
886216	2541386	2540530	277897	277058	SPBP8B7.24c	SPBC405.05	atg8	atg16	-	SPBC405.05	Co-localization	physical	Sun LL (2013)	23950735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	co-localization was at PAS-like site; deletion of Atg8 disrupted localization	-	BIOGRID
886217	2541386	2542180	277897	278655	SPBP8B7.24c	SPAC589.07c	atg8	atg1801	-	atg18|atg18a	Co-localization	physical	Sun LL (2013)	23950735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	co-localization was at PAS-like site; mutation of PI3P binding site of Atg18a disrupted localization	-	BIOGRID
886218	2542368	2540814	278832	277333	SPAC1783.06c	SPBC4B4.10c	atg12	atg5	apg12	mug77	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sun LL (2013)	23950735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Atg12 was conjugated to Atg5	-	BIOGRID
886219	2538935	2539850	275511	276398	SPCC1682.11c	SPBC15D4.07c	ctl1	atg9	SPCC1682.11c	apg9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sun LL (2013)	23950735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
886220	2539850	2538935	276398	275511	SPBC15D4.07c	SPCC1682.11c	atg9	ctl1	apg9	SPCC1682.11c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sun LL (2013)	23950735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
886372	2540470	2540013	276998	276557	SPBC29A10.15	SPBC14C8.07c	orc1	cdc18	cdc30|orp1|rid1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Grallert B (1996)	8895665	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression	orp1-4 cdc18-K46 double mutant displays synthetic checkpoint defects	-	POMBASE
886373	2540470	2539164	276998	275735	SPBC29A10.15	SPCC16A11.17	orc1	mcm4	cdc30|orp1|rid1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Grallert B (1996)	8895665	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression	orp1-4 cdc21-M68 double mutant displays synthetic checkpoint defects	-	BIOGRID
886375	2540620	3361487	277146	280563	SPBC4.04c	SPAC1805.17	mcm2	crm1	cdc19|nda1	SPAC1B2.01|caf2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Pasion SG (1999)	10588642	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution:wild type	MCM proteins remain nuclear in cdc19-P1 crm1-11R double mutant	-	POMBASE
886376	2539164	3361487	275735	280563	SPCC16A11.17	SPAC1805.17	mcm4	crm1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	SPAC1B2.01|caf2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Pasion SG (1999)	10588642	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution:wild type	MCM proteins remain nuclear in cdc21-M68 crm1-11R double mutant	-	POMBASE
886843	2541840	2540720	278331	277243	SPAC23H3.03c	SPBC216.07c	npr2	tor2	-	SPBC646.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ma N (2013)	23934889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution:wild type	tor2-287 mutation rescues Cat1 mislocalization in npr2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
886991	854992	2542801	35153	279249	YML016C	SPAC15E1.04	PPZ1	hal3	L000001478	SPAC15E1.04	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Molero C (2013)	23962284	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
886992	2542255	2542801	278725	279249	SPAC57A7.08	SPAC15E1.04	pzh1	hal3	phz1	SPAC15E1.04	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Molero C (2013)	23962284	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Pzh1 interaction with the N-terminal half of SPAC15E1.04 is stronger than with full-length SPAC15E1.04	-	BIOGRID
886993	2542255	853946	278725	34203	SPAC57A7.08	YKR072C	pzh1	SIS2	phz1	HAL3|phosphopantothenoylcysteine decarboxylase complex subunit SIS2|L000001899	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Molero C (2013)	23962284	284812	559292	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
886994	2542801	2542801	279249	279249	SPAC15E1.04	SPAC15E1.04	hal3	hal3	SPAC15E1.04	SPAC15E1.04	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Molero C (2013)	23962284	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
887135	2541970	2542022	278455	278505	SPAC23C11.13c	SPAC23A1.03	hpt1	apt1	pur1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Housset P (1977)	14008	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient uptake	pur1 dap1 double mutant has decreased uptake of adenine	-	POMBASE
887136	2543339	2543573	279762	279988	SPAC630.13c	SPAC869.11	tsc2	cat1	-	SPAC922.08c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ma N (2013)	23934889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	double mutant has increased resistance to canavanine	-	BIOGRID
887137	2541840	2543573	278331	279988	SPAC23H3.03c	SPAC869.11	npr2	cat1	-	SPAC922.08c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ma N (2013)	23934889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	double mutant has increased resistance to canavanine	-	BIOGRID
887142	5802740	2539733	857878	276285	SPNCRNA.103	SPBC16E9.12c	sme2	pab2	SPNCRNA.1341	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yamashita A (2013)	23980030	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation	Recovery of sporulation in the sme2D mutant by iss mutations	-	BIOGRID
887143	5802740	2541099	857878	277614	SPNCRNA.103	SPBC646.04	sme2	pla1	SPNCRNA.1341	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yamashita A (2013)	23980030	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation	Recovery of sporulation in the sme2D mutant by iss mutations	-	BIOGRID
887144	5802740	2541873	857878	278363	SPNCRNA.103	SPAC22G7.10	sme2	iss1	SPNCRNA.1341	SPAC22G7.10	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yamashita A (2013)	23980030	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation	Recovery of sporulation in the sme2D mutant by iss mutations	-	BIOGRID
887145	5802740	2543254	857878	279682	SPNCRNA.103	SPAC1006.03c	sme2	red1	SPNCRNA.1341	iss3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yamashita A (2013)	23980030	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation	Recovery of sporulation in the sme2D mutant by iss mutations	-	BIOGRID
887146	5802740	2540220	857878	276753	SPNCRNA.103	SPBC337.03	sme2	rhn1	SPNCRNA.1341	SPBC337.03|iss4	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yamashita A (2013)	23980030	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation	Recovery of sporulation in the sme2D mutant by iss mutations	-	BIOGRID
887147	5802740	2540452	857878	276980	SPNCRNA.103	SPBC2A9.11c	sme2	iss9	SPNCRNA.1341	SPBC2A9.11c|SPBC2D10.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yamashita A (2013)	23980030	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation	Recovery of sporulation in the sme2D mutant by iss mutations	-	BIOGRID
887148	5802740	2541655	857878	278151	SPNCRNA.103	SPAC7D4.14c	sme2	iss10	SPNCRNA.1341	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yamashita A (2013)	23980030	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation	Recovery of sporulation in the sme2D mutant by iss mutations	-	BIOGRID
887149	2539540	2543254	276102	279682	SPCC736.12c	SPAC1006.03c	mmi1	red1	-	iss3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yamashita A (2013)	23980030	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
887150	2543254	2541655	279682	278151	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC7D4.14c	red1	iss10	iss3	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	Two-hybrid	physical	Yamashita A (2013)	23980030	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
887151	2542080	2541655	278557	278151	SPAC27D7.03c	SPAC7D4.14c	mei2	iss10	-	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yamashita A (2013)	23980030	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation	Inhibition of sporulation by Iss10 overexpression in temperature-sensitive mei2 mutants	-	BIOGRID
887378	2543168	2543030	279599	279466	SPAC31A2.16	SPAC12B10.10	gef2	nod1	-	SPAC12B10.10	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhu YH (2013)	23966468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
887379	2543030	2543168	279466	279599	SPAC12B10.10	SPAC31A2.16	nod1	gef2	SPAC12B10.10	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhu YH (2013)	23966468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
887380	2543168	2543030	279599	279466	SPAC31A2.16	SPAC12B10.10	gef2	nod1	-	SPAC12B10.10	Two-hybrid	physical	Zhu YH (2013)	23966468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
887381	2543030	2543168	279466	279599	SPAC12B10.10	SPAC31A2.16	nod1	gef2	SPAC12B10.10	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Zhu YH (2013)	23966468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
887382	2541975	2543030	278460	279466	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC12B10.10	cdc15	nod1	-	SPAC12B10.10	Two-hybrid	physical	Zhu YH (2013)	23966468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
887383	2543030	2541975	279466	278460	SPAC12B10.10	SPAC20G8.05c	nod1	cdc15	SPAC12B10.10	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Zhu YH (2013)	23966468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
887384	2541975	2543030	278460	279466	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC12B10.10	cdc15	nod1	-	SPAC12B10.10	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhu YH (2013)	23966468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
887385	2543030	2541975	279466	278460	SPAC12B10.10	SPAC20G8.05c	nod1	cdc15	SPAC12B10.10	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Zhu YH (2013)	23966468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable[temperature sensitive growth]	-	-	BIOGRID
887386	2543168	2541975	279599	278460	SPAC31A2.16	SPAC20G8.05c	gef2	cdc15	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Zhu YH (2013)	23966468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable[temperature sensitive growth]	-	-	BIOGRID
887387	2542696	2541695	279149	278191	SPAC29B12.03	SPAC1F7.05	spd1	cdc22	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fleck O (2013)	23986475	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	MMS and CPT	-	BIOGRID
887388	2541925	2538930	278413	275506	SPAC5D6.05	SPCC188.13c	med18	dcr1	sep11|pmc6	SPCC584.10c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Oya E (2013)	23966866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth[resistance to chemicals]	FOA	-	BIOGRID
887686	2539087	2540234	275659	276766	SPCC1259.13	SPBC336.12c	chk1	cdc10	rad27	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ivanova T (2013)	24006488	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
887687	2540234	2541871	276766	278361	SPBC336.12c	SPAC22F3.09c	cdc10	res2	-	mcs1|pct1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ivanova T (2013)	24006488	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
887690	2540234	2540013	276766	276557	SPBC336.12c	SPBC14C8.07c	cdc10	cdc18	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Ivanova T (2013)	24006488	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	chIP	-	BIOGRID
887691	2540234	2541695	276766	278191	SPBC336.12c	SPAC1F7.05	cdc10	cdc22	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Ivanova T (2013)	24006488	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	chIP	-	BIOGRID
887698	2540624	2540499	277150	277027	SPBC24C6.07	SPBC25D12.02c	cdc14	dnt1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Yu ZY (2013)	24006256	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth|temperature sensitive growth:partial rescue	suppressive effect of dnt1D on temperature-sensitive SIN mutant cdc14-118	-	BIOGRID
887699	2542632	2540499	279086	277027	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC25D12.02c	cdc25	dnt1	sal2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yu ZY (2013)	24006256	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable[temperature sensitive growth]	dnt1D deletion is synthetic lethal with cdc25D	-	BIOGRID
887700	2539123	2540624	275695	277150	SPCC18B5.03	SPBC24C6.07	wee1	cdc14	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yu ZY (2013)	24006256	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth:partial rescue	Slightly elevated Wee1 levels rescue a cdc14-118 mutant	-	BIOGRID
887701	2541599	2540499	278096	277027	SPAC24B11.11c	SPBC25D12.02c	sid2	dnt1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Yu ZY (2013)	24006256	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
887751	2539781	2541117	276331	277632	SPBC106.10	SPBC646.13	pka1	sds23	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	moc1|psp1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Jang YJ (2013)	23640764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
887753	2539781	2541117	276331	277632	SPBC106.10	SPBC646.13	pka1	sds23	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	moc1|psp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jang YJ (2013)	23640764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
889474	2540690	2540392	277215	276920	SPBC428.20c	SPBC365.15	alp6	alp4	SPBC902.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Dhani DK (2013)	24006493	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
889561	2542414	2542244	278878	278714	SPAC6F6.16c	SPAC19G12.13c	tpz1	poz1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Jun HI (2013)	24013504	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
889562	2542414	2539352	278878	275918	SPAC6F6.16c	SPCC188.07	tpz1	ccq1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Jun HI (2013)	24013504	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
889563	2542414	2542244	278878	278714	SPAC6F6.16c	SPAC19G12.13c	tpz1	poz1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jun HI (2013)	24013504	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
889564	2542414	2539352	278878	275918	SPAC6F6.16c	SPCC188.07	tpz1	ccq1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jun HI (2013)	24013504	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
889566	2542414	2542703	278878	279156	SPAC6F6.16c	SPAC26H5.06	tpz1	pot1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Jun HI (2013)	24013504	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
889567	2542414	2542703	278878	279156	SPAC6F6.16c	SPAC26H5.06	tpz1	pot1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jun HI (2013)	24013504	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
889585	2543583	2542684	279998	279137	SPAC644.12	SPAC26A3.08	cdc5	smb1	-	smb	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889586	2543583	2542690	279998	279143	SPAC644.12	SPAC27D7.07c	cdc5	smd1	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889587	2543583	2542480	279998	278940	SPAC644.12	SPAC2C4.03c	cdc5	smd2	-	cwf9	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889588	2543583	2540884	279998	277401	SPAC644.12	SPBC19C2.14	cdc5	smd3	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889589	2543583	2539607	279998	276165	SPAC644.12	SPBC11G11.06c	cdc5	sme1	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889590	2543583	2540330	279998	276860	SPAC644.12	SPBC3E7.14	cdc5	smf1	-	SPBC4F6.01	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889591	2543583	2540855	279998	277372	SPAC644.12	SPBC4B4.05	cdc5	smg1	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889592	2543583	2539730	279998	276282	SPAC644.12	SPBC1861.08c	cdc5	lea1	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889593	2543583	2541219	279998	277733	SPAC644.12	SPBC8D2.09c	cdc5	msl1	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889594	2543583	2539645	279998	276200	SPAC644.12	SPBC146.07	cdc5	prp2	-	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889595	2543583	2540932	279998	277448	SPAC644.12	SPBC36.09	cdc5	sap61	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889596	2543583	2541437	279998	277942	SPAC644.12	SPAC22A12.09c	cdc5	sap114	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889597	2543583	2541843	279998	278334	SPAC644.12	SPAC23H3.02c	cdc5	ini1	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889598	2543583	2541609	279998	278106	SPAC644.12	SPAC22F8.10c	cdc5	sap145	-	SF3b145	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889599	2543583	2541619	279998	278116	SPAC644.12	SPAC27F1.09c	cdc5	prp10	-	sap155|SF3b155	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889600	2543583	2543278	279998	279706	SPAC644.12	SPAPJ698.03c	cdc5	prp12	-	sap130|SF3b130	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889601	2543583	2540711	279998	277234	SPAC644.12	SPBC215.12	cdc5	cwf10	-	snu114|spef2	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889602	2543583	2543676	279998	280090	SPAC644.12	SPAC9.03c	cdc5	brr2	-	spp41	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889603	2543583	2543413	279998	279835	SPAC644.12	SPAC4F8.12c	cdc5	spp42	-	cwf6	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889604	2543583	2539984	279998	276528	SPAC644.12	SPBC1289.11	cdc5	spf38	-	cwf17	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889605	2543583	2543583	279998	279998	SPAC644.12	SPAC644.12	cdc5	cdc5	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889606	2543583	2542531	279998	278989	SPAC644.12	SPAC3A12.11c	cdc5	cwf2	-	prp3|cwc2	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889607	2543583	2540585	279998	277111	SPAC644.12	SPBC28F2.04c	cdc5	cwf7	-	spf27	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889608	2543583	2540983	279998	277499	SPAC644.12	SPBC337.06c	cdc5	cwf15	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889609	2543583	3361260	279998	280336	SPAC644.12	SPBP22H7.07	cdc5	prp5	-	cwf1|pi024|SPACTOKYO_453.10	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889610	2543583	2542256	279998	278726	SPAC644.12	SPAC29A4.08c	cdc5	prp19	-	cwf8	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889611	2543583	2540753	279998	277274	SPAC644.12	SPBC211.02c	cdc5	cwf3	-	syf1	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889612	2543583	2540328	279998	276858	SPAC644.12	SPBC31F10.11c	cdc5	cwf4	-	syf3	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889613	2543583	2538974	279998	275548	SPAC644.12	SPCC550.02c	cdc5	cwf5	-	ecm2	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889614	2543583	2540230	279998	276762	SPAC644.12	SPBC32F12.05c	cdc5	cwf12	-	isy1	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889615	2543583	2538988	279998	275562	SPAC644.12	SPCC188.11	cdc5	prp45	-	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889616	2543583	2541168	279998	277683	SPAC644.12	SPBC6B1.10	cdc5	prp17	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889617	2543583	2540611	279998	277137	SPAC644.12	SPBC3E7.13c	cdc5	syf2	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889618	2543583	2541124	279998	277639	SPAC644.12	SPBC646.02	cdc5	cwf11	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889619	2543583	2540434	279998	276962	SPAC644.12	SPBC24C6.11	cdc5	cwf14	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889620	2543583	3361543	279998	280619	SPAC644.12	SPAC9.13c	cdc5	cwf16	-	SPAPJ735.01c	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889621	2543583	2538901	279998	275479	SPAC644.12	SPCP1E11.07c	cdc5	cwf18	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889622	2543583	2543189	279998	279618	SPAC644.12	SPAC30D11.09	cdc5	cwf19	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889623	2543583	2543616	279998	280030	SPAC644.12	SPAC4A8.09c	cdc5	cwf21	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889624	2543583	2539941	279998	276485	SPAC644.12	SPBC13E7.01	cdc5	cwf22	-	SPBC15D4.16	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889625	2543583	2539683	279998	276238	SPAC644.12	SPBC146.05c	cdc5	cwf25	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889626	2543583	2538931	279998	275507	SPAC644.12	SPCC1620.10	cdc5	cwf26	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889627	2543583	2543019	279998	279455	SPAC644.12	SPAC57A10.03	cdc5	cyp1	-	cyp2	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889628	2543583	2541461	279998	277963	SPAC644.12	SPAC1F3.09	cdc5	mug161	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889629	2543583	2540006	279998	276550	SPAC644.12	SPBC1711.17	cdc5	prp16	-	SPBC17G9.01	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889630	2543583	2540707	279998	277230	SPAC644.12	SPBC19C2.01	cdc5	cdc28	-	prp8|SPBC21B10.01c|SPBC874.01	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889631	2543583	2540057	279998	276595	SPAC644.12	SPBC16H5.10c	cdc5	prp43	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889632	2543583	2542978	279998	279416	SPAC644.12	SPAC10F6.02c	cdc5	prp22	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889633	2543583	2540801	279998	277320	SPAC644.12	SPBC18H10.10c	cdc5	saf4	-	cwc16|cwf16	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889634	2543583	2543409	279998	279831	SPAC644.12	SPAC4D7.13	cdc5	usp104	-	prp40	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889635	2543583	2540869	279998	277386	SPAC644.12	SPBC4B4.09	cdc5	usp105	-	prp39	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889636	2543583	2538832	279998	275413	SPAC644.12	SPCC962.06c	cdc5	bpb1	-	sf1|ods3	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889637	2543583	2542545	279998	279002	SPAC644.12	SPAC19G12.07c	cdc5	rsd1	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889638	2543583	2542169	279998	278644	SPAC644.12	SPAC29A4.06c	cdc5	SPAC29A4.06c	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889639	2543583	2539847	279998	276395	SPAC644.12	SPBC530.14c	cdc5	dsk1	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889640	2543583	2542772	279998	279221	SPAC644.12	SPAC16.02c	cdc5	srp2	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889641	2543583	2538689	279998	275274	SPAC644.12	SPCC1795.11	cdc5	sum3	-	ded1|moc2|slh3	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889642	2540711	2542684	277234	279137	SPBC215.12	SPAC26A3.08	cwf10	smb1	snu114|spef2	smb	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889643	2540711	2542690	277234	279143	SPBC215.12	SPAC27D7.07c	cwf10	smd1	snu114|spef2	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889644	2540711	2542480	277234	278940	SPBC215.12	SPAC2C4.03c	cwf10	smd2	snu114|spef2	cwf9	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889645	2540711	2540884	277234	277401	SPBC215.12	SPBC19C2.14	cwf10	smd3	snu114|spef2	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889646	2540711	2539607	277234	276165	SPBC215.12	SPBC11G11.06c	cwf10	sme1	snu114|spef2	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889647	2540711	2540330	277234	276860	SPBC215.12	SPBC3E7.14	cwf10	smf1	snu114|spef2	SPBC4F6.01	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889648	2540711	2540855	277234	277372	SPBC215.12	SPBC4B4.05	cwf10	smg1	snu114|spef2	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889649	2540711	2539730	277234	276282	SPBC215.12	SPBC1861.08c	cwf10	lea1	snu114|spef2	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889650	2540711	2541219	277234	277733	SPBC215.12	SPBC8D2.09c	cwf10	msl1	snu114|spef2	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889651	2540711	2540711	277234	277234	SPBC215.12	SPBC215.12	cwf10	cwf10	snu114|spef2	snu114|spef2	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889652	2540711	2543413	277234	279835	SPBC215.12	SPAC4F8.12c	cwf10	spp42	snu114|spef2	cwf6	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889653	2540711	2539984	277234	276528	SPBC215.12	SPBC1289.11	cwf10	spf38	snu114|spef2	cwf17	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889654	2540711	2543583	277234	279998	SPBC215.12	SPAC644.12	cwf10	cdc5	snu114|spef2	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889655	2540711	2542531	277234	278989	SPBC215.12	SPAC3A12.11c	cwf10	cwf2	snu114|spef2	prp3|cwc2	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889656	2540711	2540585	277234	277111	SPBC215.12	SPBC28F2.04c	cwf10	cwf7	snu114|spef2	spf27	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889657	2540711	2540983	277234	277499	SPBC215.12	SPBC337.06c	cwf10	cwf15	snu114|spef2	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889658	2540711	3361260	277234	280336	SPBC215.12	SPBP22H7.07	cwf10	prp5	snu114|spef2	cwf1|pi024|SPACTOKYO_453.10	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889659	2540711	2542256	277234	278726	SPBC215.12	SPAC29A4.08c	cwf10	prp19	snu114|spef2	cwf8	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889660	2540711	2540753	277234	277274	SPBC215.12	SPBC211.02c	cwf10	cwf3	snu114|spef2	syf1	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889661	2540711	2540328	277234	276858	SPBC215.12	SPBC31F10.11c	cwf10	cwf4	snu114|spef2	syf3	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889662	2540711	2538974	277234	275548	SPBC215.12	SPCC550.02c	cwf10	cwf5	snu114|spef2	ecm2	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889663	2540711	2540230	277234	276762	SPBC215.12	SPBC32F12.05c	cwf10	cwf12	snu114|spef2	isy1	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889664	2540711	2538988	277234	275562	SPBC215.12	SPCC188.11	cwf10	prp45	snu114|spef2	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889665	2540711	2541168	277234	277683	SPBC215.12	SPBC6B1.10	cwf10	prp17	snu114|spef2	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889666	2540711	2540611	277234	277137	SPBC215.12	SPBC3E7.13c	cwf10	syf2	snu114|spef2	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889667	2540711	2541124	277234	277639	SPBC215.12	SPBC646.02	cwf10	cwf11	snu114|spef2	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889668	2540711	2540434	277234	276962	SPBC215.12	SPBC24C6.11	cwf10	cwf14	snu114|spef2	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889669	2540711	2538901	277234	275479	SPBC215.12	SPCP1E11.07c	cwf10	cwf18	snu114|spef2	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889670	2540711	2543189	277234	279618	SPBC215.12	SPAC30D11.09	cwf10	cwf19	snu114|spef2	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889671	2540711	2543616	277234	280030	SPBC215.12	SPAC4A8.09c	cwf10	cwf21	snu114|spef2	-	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889672	2540711	2539941	277234	276485	SPBC215.12	SPBC13E7.01	cwf10	cwf22	snu114|spef2	SPBC15D4.16	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889673	2540711	2543019	277234	279455	SPBC215.12	SPAC57A10.03	cwf10	cyp1	snu114|spef2	cyp2	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889674	2540711	2540801	277234	277320	SPBC215.12	SPBC18H10.10c	cwf10	saf4	snu114|spef2	cwc16|cwf16	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889675	2540711	2538689	277234	275274	SPBC215.12	SPCC1795.11	cwf10	sum3	snu114|spef2	ded1|moc2|slh3	Co-purification	physical	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	1D liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry	-	BIOGRID
889676	2540711	2541185	277234	277699	SPBC215.12	SPBC6B1.07	cwf10	prp1	snu114|spef2	zer1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
889677	2540711	2543413	277234	279835	SPBC215.12	SPAC4F8.12c	cwf10	spp42	snu114|spef2	cwf6	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
889678	2540711	2543583	277234	279998	SPBC215.12	SPAC644.12	cwf10	cdc5	snu114|spef2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
889679	2540711	2539312	277234	275879	SPBC215.12	SPCC777.14	cwf10	prp4	snu114|spef2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
889680	2540711	2540707	277234	277230	SPBC215.12	SPBC19C2.01	cwf10	cdc28	snu114|spef2	prp8|SPBC21B10.01c|SPBC874.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
889681	2540711	2543676	277234	280090	SPBC215.12	SPAC9.03c	cwf10	brr2	snu114|spef2	spp41	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
889682	2540711	2543611	277234	280025	SPBC215.12	SPAC3H5.04	cwf10	aar2	snu114|spef2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
889683	2540711	2541619	277234	278116	SPBC215.12	SPAC27F1.09c	cwf10	prp10	snu114|spef2	sap155|SF3b155	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Livesay SB (2013)	24014766	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
889687	2541942	2540821	278429	277339	SPAC222.09	SPBC800.03	seb1	clr3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Marina DB (2013)	24013500	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
889688	2541942	2540558	278429	277085	SPAC222.09	SPBC2D10.17	seb1	clr1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Marina DB (2013)	24013500	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
889689	2541942	2541336	278429	277847	SPAC222.09	SPBP35G2.10	seb1	mit1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Marina DB (2013)	24013500	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
889690	2540821	2541942	277339	278429	SPBC800.03	SPAC222.09	clr3	seb1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Marina DB (2013)	24013500	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	chIP	-	BIOGRID
889691	2540558	2541942	277085	278429	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC222.09	clr1	seb1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Marina DB (2013)	24013500	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	chIP	-	BIOGRID
889692	2540047	2541942	276585	278429	SPBC16C6.10	SPAC222.09	chp2	seb1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Marina DB (2013)	24013500	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	chIP	-	BIOGRID
889693	2541336	2541942	277847	278429	SPBP35G2.10	SPAC222.09	mit1	seb1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Marina DB (2013)	24013500	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	chIP	-	BIOGRID
890772	2539781	2541055	276331	277570	SPBC106.10	SPBC409.07c	pka1	wis1	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	smf2|spc2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Jang YJ (2013)	23640764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	entry into G0 (stationary phase)|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
890773	2539781	2541117	276331	277632	SPBC106.10	SPBC646.13	pka1	sds23	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	moc1|psp1	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Jang YJ (2013)	23640764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	entry into G0 (stationary phase)|vegetative growth	Growth of the pka1 wis1 double mutant over-expressing non-phosphorylatable alleles of Sds23 was growth inhibited compared to the double mutant alone	-	BIOGRID
890774	2541652	2541117	278148	277632	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC646.13	sty1	sds23	phh1|spc1	moc1|psp1	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Jang YJ (2013)	23640764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	entry into G0 (stationary phase)|vegetative growth	Growth of the sty1 mutant over-expressing non-phosphorylatable alleles of Sds23 was growth inhibited compared to the sty1 mutant alone	-	BIOGRID
890775	2539781	2541117	276331	277632	SPBC106.10	SPBC646.13	pka1	sds23	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	moc1|psp1	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Jang YJ (2013)	23640764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	exit from G0 (stationary phase)|inviable	Survival of the pka1 mutant over-expressing non-phosphorylatable alleles of Sds23 was lower upon exit from stationary phase compared to the pka1 mutant alone|Survival of the pka1 wis1 double mutant over-expressing non-phosphorylatable alleles of Sds23 was lower upon exit from stationary phase compared to the pka1 wis1 double mutant alone	-	BIOGRID
890776	2541652	2541117	278148	277632	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC646.13	sty1	sds23	phh1|spc1	moc1|psp1	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Jang YJ (2013)	23640764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	exit from G0 (stationary phase)|inviable	Survival of the sty1 mutant over-expressing non-phosphorylatable alleles of Sds23 was lower upon exit from stationary phase compared to the sty1 mutant alone	-	BIOGRID
890777	2541055	2541117	277570	277632	SPBC409.07c	SPBC646.13	wis1	sds23	smf2|spc2	moc1|psp1	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Jang YJ (2013)	23640764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	exit from G0 (stationary phase)|inviable	Survival of the pka1 wis1 double mutant over-expressing non-phosphorylatable alleles of Sds23 was lower upon exit from stationary phase compared to the pka1 wis1 double mutant alone	-	BIOGRID
890778	2541055	2541117	277570	277632	SPBC409.07c	SPBC646.13	wis1	sds23	smf2|spc2	moc1|psp1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Jang YJ (2013)	23640764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology	The morphology of the pka1 wis1 double mutant over-expressing non-phosphorylatable alleles of Sds23 was more abnormal (branched, elongated) compared to the pka1 wis1 double mutant alone	-	BIOGRID
890779	2539781	2541117	276331	277632	SPBC106.10	SPBC646.13	pka1	sds23	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	moc1|psp1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Jang YJ (2013)	23640764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology	The morphology of the pka1 wis1 double mutant over-expressing non-phosphorylatable alleles of Sds23 was more abnormal (branched, elongated) compared to the pka1 wis1 double mutant alone	-	BIOGRID
890780	2541117	2542023	277632	278506	SPBC646.13	SPAC20H4.10	sds23	ufd2	moc1|psp1	SPAC145.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Jang YJ (2013)	23640764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
890781	2541117	2542023	277632	278506	SPBC646.13	SPAC20H4.10	sds23	ufd2	moc1|psp1	SPAC145.04	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Jang YJ (2013)	23640764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
890782	2542023	2541117	278506	277632	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC646.13	ufd2	sds23	SPAC145.04	moc1|psp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jang YJ (2013)	23640764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Interaction occurred in stationary phase only	-	BIOGRID
903790	64462	2540650	249077	277175	-	SPBC244.01c	Csnk1d	sid4	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Johnson AE (2013)	24055157	10116	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
903964	2541889	2540468	278379	276996	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC23G7.04c	pom1	nif1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Wood E (2013)	24047646	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology	Double mutants showed abnormal morphologies compared to either single mutant	-	BIOGRID
904021	2541466	2539733	277968	276285	SPAC14C4.06c	SPBC16E9.12c	nab2	pab2	SPAC14C4.06c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth|vegetative growth	Growth of the nab2D pab2D double mutant strain was impaired at all temperatures|tested as compared to either single mutant	-	BIOGRID
904022	2541466	2539733	277968	276285	SPAC14C4.06c	SPBC16E9.12c	nab2	pab2	SPAC14C4.06c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA modification	deletion of nab2 from the pab2D strain exacerbated the previously described  hyperadenylation phenotype of the single pab2D mutant	-	BIOGRID
904023	2541466	2542661	277968	279114	SPAC14C4.06c	SPAC1250.05	nab2	rpl3002	SPAC14C4.06c	rpl30|rpl30-2	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904024	2541466	2542256	277968	278726	SPAC14C4.06c	SPAC29A4.08c	nab2	prp19	SPAC14C4.06c	cwf8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904025	2541466	2543413	277968	279835	SPAC14C4.06c	SPAC4F8.12c	nab2	spp42	SPAC14C4.06c	cwf6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904026	2541466	2540711	277968	277234	SPAC14C4.06c	SPBC215.12	nab2	cwf10	SPAC14C4.06c	snu114|spef2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904027	2541466	2540045	277968	276583	SPAC14C4.06c	SPBC119.13c	nab2	prp31	SPAC14C4.06c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904028	2541466	2541124	277968	277639	SPAC14C4.06c	SPBC646.02	nab2	cwf11	SPAC14C4.06c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904029	2541466	2540753	277968	277274	SPAC14C4.06c	SPBC211.02c	nab2	cwf3	SPAC14C4.06c	syf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904030	2541466	2541619	277968	278116	SPAC14C4.06c	SPAC27F1.09c	nab2	prp10	SPAC14C4.06c	sap155|SF3b155	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904031	2541466	2543676	277968	280090	SPAC14C4.06c	SPAC9.03c	nab2	brr2	SPAC14C4.06c	spp41	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904032	2541466	2540328	277968	276858	SPAC14C4.06c	SPBC31F10.11c	nab2	cwf4	SPAC14C4.06c	syf3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904033	2541466	2541126	277968	277641	SPAC14C4.06c	SPBC651.01c	nab2	nog1	SPAC14C4.06c	SPBC725.18c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904034	2541466	2543278	277968	279706	SPAC14C4.06c	SPAPJ698.03c	nab2	prp12	SPAC14C4.06c	sap130|SF3b130	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904035	2541466	2541168	277968	277683	SPAC14C4.06c	SPBC6B1.10	nab2	prp17	SPAC14C4.06c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904036	2541466	2542480	277968	278940	SPAC14C4.06c	SPAC2C4.03c	nab2	smd2	SPAC14C4.06c	cwf9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904037	2541466	2543583	277968	279998	SPAC14C4.06c	SPAC644.12	nab2	cdc5	SPAC14C4.06c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904038	2541466	2539941	277968	276485	SPAC14C4.06c	SPBC13E7.01	nab2	cwf22	SPAC14C4.06c	SPBC15D4.16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904039	2541466	2538988	277968	275562	SPAC14C4.06c	SPCC188.11	nab2	prp45	SPAC14C4.06c	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904040	2541466	2539984	277968	276528	SPAC14C4.06c	SPBC1289.11	nab2	spf38	SPAC14C4.06c	cwf17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904041	2541466	2542690	277968	279143	SPAC14C4.06c	SPAC27D7.07c	nab2	smd1	SPAC14C4.06c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904042	2541466	2540057	277968	276595	SPAC14C4.06c	SPBC16H5.10c	nab2	prp43	SPAC14C4.06c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904043	2541466	2542684	277968	279137	SPAC14C4.06c	SPAC26A3.08	nab2	smb1	SPAC14C4.06c	smb	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904044	2541466	2540884	277968	277401	SPAC14C4.06c	SPBC19C2.14	nab2	smd3	SPAC14C4.06c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904045	2541466	3361260	277968	280336	SPAC14C4.06c	SPBP22H7.07	nab2	prp5	SPAC14C4.06c	cwf1|pi024|SPACTOKYO_453.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904046	2541466	2539730	277968	276282	SPAC14C4.06c	SPBC1861.08c	nab2	lea1	SPAC14C4.06c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904047	2541466	2541437	277968	277942	SPAC14C4.06c	SPAC22A12.09c	nab2	sap114	SPAC14C4.06c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904048	2541466	2540330	277968	276860	SPAC14C4.06c	SPBC3E7.14	nab2	smf1	SPAC14C4.06c	SPBC4F6.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904049	2541466	2541609	277968	278106	SPAC14C4.06c	SPAC22F8.10c	nab2	sap145	SPAC14C4.06c	SF3b145	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904050	2541466	2540869	277968	277386	SPAC14C4.06c	SPBC4B4.09	nab2	usp105	SPAC14C4.06c	prp39	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904051	2541466	2540983	277968	277499	SPAC14C4.06c	SPBC337.06c	nab2	cwf15	SPAC14C4.06c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904052	2541466	2542481	277968	278941	SPAC14C4.06c	SPAC29A4.04c	nab2	cbf5	SPAC14C4.06c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904053	2541466	2540479	277968	277007	SPAC14C4.06c	SPBC2D10.10c	nab2	fib1	SPAC14C4.06c	fib|nop1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904054	2541466	2541087	277968	277602	SPAC14C4.06c	SPBC646.10c	nab2	SPBC646.10c	SPAC14C4.06c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904055	2541466	2538897	277968	275475	SPAC14C4.06c	SPCC1183.07	nab2	SPCC1183.07	SPAC14C4.06c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904056	2541466	2541814	277968	278305	SPAC14C4.06c	SPAC23G3.06	nab2	SPAC23G3.06	SPAC14C4.06c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904057	2541466	2540705	277968	277228	SPAC14C4.06c	SPBC20F10.01	nab2	gar1	SPAC14C4.06c	SPBC25H2.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904058	2541466	2542369	277968	278833	SPAC14C4.06c	SPAC1782.10c	nab2	nhp2	SPAC14C4.06c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904059	2541466	2541176	277968	277690	SPAC14C4.06c	SPBC776.08c	nab2	utp22	SPAC14C4.06c	SPBC776.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904060	2541466	2541274	277968	277788	SPAC14C4.06c	SPBP8B7.20c	nab2	nop2	SPAC14C4.06c	SPBP8B7.20c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904061	2541466	2542327	277968	278793	SPAC14C4.06c	SPAC16C9.06c	nab2	upf1	SPAC14C4.06c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904062	2541466	2542173	277968	278648	SPAC14C4.06c	SPAC17H9.02	nab2	mtl1	SPAC14C4.06c	SPAC17H9.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904063	2541466	2539540	277968	276102	SPAC14C4.06c	SPCC736.12c	nab2	mmi1	SPAC14C4.06c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904064	2541466	2541639	277968	278135	SPAC14C4.06c	SPAC6F12.16c	nab2	mtr4	SPAC14C4.06c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904071	2543544	2543281	279961	279708	SPAC664.07c	SPAC23C4.18c	rad9	rad4	-	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Qu M (2013)	24074952	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904072	2543281	2540992	279708	277508	SPAC23C4.18c	SPBC342.05	rad4	crb2	cut5|dpb11|dre3	rhp9	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Qu M (2013)	24074952	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904073	2539869	2540992	276415	277508	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC342.05	cdc2	crb2	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	rhp9	Biochemical Activity	physical	Qu M (2013)	24074952	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	CDK complex Cdc2/Cdc13	-	BIOGRID
904074	2540992	2543281	277508	279708	SPBC342.05	SPAC23C4.18c	crb2	rad4	rhp9	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Qu M (2013)	24074952	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
904075	2543281	2540880	279708	277397	SPAC23C4.18c	SPBC582.03	rad4	cdc13	cut5|dpb11|dre3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Qu M (2013)	24074952	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
905034	2538930	2540515	275506	277043	SPCC188.13c	SPBC29A10.09c	dcr1	tri1	SPCC584.10c	SPBC29A10.09c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Marasovic M (2013)	24095277	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:partial rescue	overexpression of tri1 generates several-fold more priRNAs in vivo	-	BIOGRID
905040	2539403	2540735	275968	277258	SPCC736.11	SPBC83.03c	ago1	tas3	csp9	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Marasovic M (2013)	24095277	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
905041	2539403	2542239	275968	278711	SPCC736.11	SPAC18G6.02c	ago1	chp1	csp9	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Marasovic M (2013)	24095277	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
905042	2539403	2542862	275968	279308	SPCC736.11	SPAC140.03	ago1	arb1	csp9	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Marasovic M (2013)	24095277	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
905043	2539403	2542879	275968	279324	SPCC736.11	SPAC13G7.07	ago1	arb2	csp9	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Marasovic M (2013)	24095277	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
905044	2539403	2540515	275968	277043	SPCC736.11	SPBC29A10.09c	ago1	tri1	csp9	SPBC29A10.09c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Marasovic M (2013)	24095277	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
905048	2540515	2539403	277043	275968	SPBC29A10.09c	SPCC736.11	tri1	ago1	SPBC29A10.09c	csp9	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Marasovic M (2013)	24095277	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
905049	2538930	2540515	275506	277043	SPCC188.13c	SPBC29A10.09c	dcr1	tri1	SPCC584.10c	SPBC29A10.09c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Marasovic M (2013)	24095277	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation|silencing	double mutants show a decrease in Argonaute-associated dg priRNAs and H3K9me2 at centromeric repeats	-	BIOGRID
905050	2543630	2540515	280044	277043	SPAC1F3.01	SPBC29A10.09c	rrp6	tri1	SPAC3H8.11	SPBC29A10.09c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Marasovic M (2013)	24095277	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:wild type	deletion of tri1 or dcr1 inhibits the increase in H3K9me2 levels seen in an rrp6 gene	-	BIOGRID
905051	2543630	2538930	280044	275506	SPAC1F3.01	SPCC188.13c	rrp6	dcr1	SPAC3H8.11	SPCC584.10c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Marasovic M (2013)	24095277	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:wild type	deletion of tri1 or dcr1 inhibits the increase in H3K9me2 levels seen in an rrp6 gene	-	BIOGRID
905055	2541599	2541603	278096	278100	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC1F5.04c	sid2	cdc12	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Bohnert KA (2013)	24115772	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
905056	2541603	2540051	278100	276589	SPAC1F5.04c	SPBC32H8.12c	cdc12	act1	-	cps8|pi012	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bohnert KA (2013)	24115772	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
905057	2541603	2543545	278100	279962	SPAC1F5.04c	SPAC926.03	cdc12	rlc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bohnert KA (2013)	24115772	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
905058	2541603	2539513	278100	276075	SPAC1F5.04c	SPCC645.05c	cdc12	myo2	-	rng5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bohnert KA (2013)	24115772	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
905059	2541603	2539205	278100	275775	SPAC1F5.04c	SPCC4B3.15	cdc12	mid1	-	dmf1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bohnert KA (2013)	24115772	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis|heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
905060	2541603	2541975	278100	278460	SPAC1F5.04c	SPAC20G8.05c	cdc12	cdc15	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bohnert KA (2013)	24115772	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
905061	2541603	2542358	278100	278823	SPAC1F5.04c	SPAC1782.09c	cdc12	clp1	-	flp1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bohnert KA (2013)	24115772	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis	-	-	BIOGRID
905062	2541603	2540737	278100	277260	SPAC1F5.04c	SPBC19G7.05c	cdc12	bgs1	-	cps1|drc1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bohnert KA (2013)	24115772	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology	double mutants show F-actin clumps and other actin defects	-	BIOGRID
905063	2541599	2540737	278096	277260	SPAC24B11.11c	SPBC19G7.05c	sid2	bgs1	-	cps1|drc1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bohnert KA (2013)	24115772	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology	double mutants show F-actin clumps and other actin defects	-	BIOGRID
905064	2541603	2541603	278100	278100	SPAC1F5.04c	SPAC1F5.04c	cdc12	cdc12	-	-	Co-fractionation	physical	Bohnert KA (2013)	24115772	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Cdc12 oligomerizes	-	BIOGRID
905065	2541603	2541603	278100	278100	SPAC1F5.04c	SPAC1F5.04c	cdc12	cdc12	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Bohnert KA (2013)	24115772	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Cdc12 oligomerizes in vitro	-	BIOGRID
905066	2541603	2539765	278100	276316	SPAC1F5.04c	SPBC1778.06c	cdc12	fim1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bohnert KA (2013)	24115772	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	cdc12delta1451-1538	-	BIOGRID
905067	2541603	2540051	278100	276589	SPAC1F5.04c	SPBC32H8.12c	cdc12	act1	-	cps8|pi012	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Bohnert KA (2013)	24115772	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
905068	2539487	2543129	276050	279561	SPCC895.05	SPAC4F8.13c	for3	rng2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Coffman VC (2013)	24127216	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
905069	2539487	2541699	276050	278195	SPCC895.05	SPAP8A3.08	for3	cdc4	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Coffman VC (2013)	24127216	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
905070	2541603	2539487	278100	276050	SPAC1F5.04c	SPCC895.05	cdc12	for3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Coffman VC (2013)	24127216	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology|cytokinesis	ring assembly was significantly delayed in cdc12-112/for3 mutant at the permissive temperature	-	BIOGRID
905071	2541603	2541975	278100	278460	SPAC1F5.04c	SPAC20G8.05c	cdc12	cdc15	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Coffman VC (2013)	24127216	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
905072	2541603	2539487	278100	276050	SPAC1F5.04c	SPCC895.05	cdc12	for3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Coffman VC (2013)	24127216	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis|inviable	delta503-cdc12/for3null and delta841-cdc12/for3null mutants are lethal with evidence of cytokinesis defects	-	BIOGRID
905073	2539487	2543545	276050	279962	SPCC895.05	SPAC926.03	for3	rlc1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Coffman VC (2013)	24127216	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
905074	2541603	2539205	278100	275775	SPAC1F5.04c	SPCC4B3.15	cdc12	mid1	-	dmf1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Coffman VC (2013)	24127216	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
905075	2541603	2543129	278100	279561	SPAC1F5.04c	SPAC4F8.13c	cdc12	rng2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Coffman VC (2013)	24127216	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
905076	2541603	2541699	278100	278195	SPAC1F5.04c	SPAP8A3.08	cdc12	cdc4	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Coffman VC (2013)	24127216	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
905077	2541603	2539513	278100	276075	SPAC1F5.04c	SPCC645.05c	cdc12	myo2	-	rng5	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Coffman VC (2013)	24127216	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
905078	2541603	2543545	278100	279962	SPAC1F5.04c	SPAC926.03	cdc12	rlc1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Coffman VC (2013)	24127216	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
905120	2540848	2542181	277365	278656	SPBC56F2.11	SPAC29E6.05c	met6	mxr1	-	SPAC29E6.05c|MsrA|SPAC30.09c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Garcia-Santamarina S (2013)	24118096	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient uptake|vegetative growth	cells lacking Met6 and Mxr1 do not grow in Met sulfoxide as a sole source of Met	-	BIOGRID
905121	2540848	2542084	277365	278561	SPBC56F2.11	SPAC7D4.07c	met6	trx1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Garcia-Santamarina S (2013)	24118096	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient uptake|vegetative growth	cells lacking Met6 and Trx1 and Grx1 show reduced growth in Met sulfoxide as a sole source of Met compared to double mutants|cells lacking Met6 and Trx1 or Grx1 do not grow in Met sulfoxide as a sole source of Met|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
905122	2540848	2543556	277365	279973	SPBC56F2.11	SPAC4F10.20	met6	grx1	-	TTase1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Garcia-Santamarina S (2013)	24118096	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient uptake|vegetative growth	cells lacking Met6 and Trx1 and Grx1 show reduced growth in Met sulfoxide as a sole source of Met compared to double mutants|cells lacking Met6 and Trx1 or Grx1 do not grow in Met sulfoxide as a sole source of Met|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
905738	2541599	2539149	278096	275721	SPAC24B11.11c	SPCC1739.11c	sid2	cdc11	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	McCormick CD (2013)	24047983	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
905739	2540845	2539149	277362	275721	SPBC428.13c	SPCC1739.11c	mob1	cdc11	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	McCormick CD (2013)	24047983	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
907699	2540885	2539869	277402	276415	SPBC660.14	SPBC11B10.09	mik1	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lee MS (1994)	7982971	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
907767	2542285	2540440	278753	276968	SPAC17H9.09c	SPBC646.12c	ras1	gap1	ste5	sar1|src1	FRET	physical	Weston C (2013)	24147005	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
907768	2540440	2542337	276968	278803	SPBC646.12c	SPAC16E8.09	gap1	scd1	sar1|src1	ral1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Weston C (2013)	24147005	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	pheromone sensitivity:wild type|viable:wild type	deletion of scd1 inhibits the pheromone induced cell death seen in a gap1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
907769	2540440	2539992	276968	276536	SPBC646.12c	SPBC1289.04c	gap1	pob1	sar1|src1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Weston C (2013)	24147005	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	pheromone sensitivity:partial rescue|viable:partial rescue	overexpression of pob1 reduced the pheromone induced cell death seen in a gap1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
907770	2542285	2539992	278753	276536	SPAC17H9.09c	SPBC1289.04c	ras1	pob1	ste5	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Weston C (2013)	24147005	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology:partial rescue	Hyperactive Ras1 mutant cells failed to display similar polarization of actin. These defects were corrected upon increased expression of either Cdc42 or Pob1	-	BIOGRID
907771	2542285	2543027	278753	279463	SPAC17H9.09c	SPAC110.03	ras1	cdc42	ste5	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Weston C (2013)	24147005	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology:partial rescue	Hyperactive Ras1 mutant cells failed to display similar polarization of actin. These defects were corrected upon increased expression of either Cdc42 or Pob1	-	BIOGRID
907775	2540051	2541940	276589	278427	SPBC32H8.12c	SPAC27F1.02c	act1	cdc8	cps8|pi012	fus4	Co-fractionation	physical	Cranz-Mileva S (2013)	24167549	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
907797	2539671	2542875	276226	279320	SPBC1734.11	SPAC13G7.02c	mas5	ssa1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Vjestica A (2013)	24146635	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
907798	2539671	2539225	276226	275795	SPBC1734.11	SPCC1739.13	mas5	ssa2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Vjestica A (2013)	24146635	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
907942	2543449	2539658	279869	276213	SPAPB1A10.02	SPBC1105.17	scm3	cnp1	-	sim2	Co-localization	physical	Ogiyama Y (2013)	24186062	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	ChIP|Scm3 deficiency causes reduction of Cnp1 levels at centromeres	-	BIOGRID
907964	2540320	2540589	276850	277115	SPBC3D6.04c	SPBC20F10.06	mad1	mad2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Heinrich S (2013)	24161933	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
907977	2541158	2542106	277673	278582	SPBC660.13c	SPAC8E11.03c	ssb1	dmc1	rad11|rpa1	dmp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Murayama Y (2013)	24186976	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
907978	2542106	2541158	278582	277673	SPAC8E11.03c	SPBC660.13c	dmc1	ssb1	dmp1	rad11|rpa1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Murayama Y (2013)	24186976	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
908553	2541580	2539623	278077	276180	SPAC1687.05	SPBC16A3.09c	pli1	ufd1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Kohler JB (2013)	24265825	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
908554	2542542	2539623	278999	276180	SPAC19A8.10	SPBC16A3.09c	rfp1	ufd1	mug140	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Kohler JB (2013)	24265825	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
908555	2541580	2539623	278077	276180	SPAC1687.05	SPBC16A3.09c	pli1	ufd1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kohler JB (2013)	24265825	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
908556	2542542	2539623	278999	276180	SPAC19A8.10	SPBC16A3.09c	rfp1	ufd1	mug140	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kohler JB (2013)	24265825	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
908557	2542744	2540618	279194	277144	SPAC1565.08	SPBC3D6.11c	cdc48	slx8	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kohler JB (2013)	24265825	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
908558	2539623	2543086	276180	279519	SPBC16A3.09c	SPAC30D11.10	ufd1	rad52	-	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kohler JB (2013)	24265825	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance[decreased]|resistance to chemicals[camptothecin^decreased^hydroxyurea]|vegetative growth[decreased]	ufd1deltaCt213-342 allele	-	BIOGRID
908559	2539623	2543580	276180	279995	SPBC16A3.09c	SPAC644.14c	ufd1	rad51	-	rhp51	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kohler JB (2013)	24265825	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance[decreased]|resistance to chemicals[camptothecin^decreased^hydroxyurea]|vegetative growth[decreased]	ufd1deltaCt213-342 allele	-	BIOGRID
908560	2539623	2541620	276180	278117	SPBC16A3.09c	SPAC2G11.12	ufd1	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kohler JB (2013)	24265825	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance[decreased]|resistance to chemicals[camptothecin^decreased^hydroxyurea]|vegetative growth[decreased]	ufd1deltaCt213-342 allele	-	BIOGRID
908561	2539623	2539686	276180	276241	SPBC16A3.09c	SPBC1734.06	ufd1	rhp18	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kohler JB (2013)	24265825	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance[decreased]	-	-	BIOGRID
908562	2539623	2539686	276180	276241	SPBC16A3.09c	SPBC1734.06	ufd1	rhp18	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kohler JB (2013)	24265825	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals[camptothecin^increased]	-	-	BIOGRID
908563	2539623	2542925	276180	279366	SPBC16A3.09c	SPAC11E3.04c	ufd1	ubc13	-	spu13|sst5	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kohler JB (2013)	24265825	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals[camptothecin^increased]	-	-	BIOGRID
908564	2540618	2539686	277144	276241	SPBC3D6.11c	SPBC1734.06	slx8	rhp18	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kohler JB (2013)	24265825	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals[camptothecin^decreased]	-	-	BIOGRID
914241	2539688	2541503	276243	278005	SPBC146.06c	SPAC22A12.01c	fan1	pso2	SPBC146.06c	SPAC56F8.17c|snm1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth[resistance to chemicals]	When exposed to increasing doses of cisplatin|When exposed to increasing doses of cisplatin and MMC,|in viability compared to the corresponding single mutants or|the fan1-d pso2-d double mutant showed a dramatic reduction|the wild-type (wt) control strain	-	BIOGRID
914242	2539688	2541051	276243	277566	SPBC146.06c	SPBC3E7.08c	fan1	rad13	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth[resistance to chemicals]	When exposed to increasing doses of cisplatin|in viability compared to the corresponding single mutants or|the fan1-d pso2-d double mutant showed a dramatic reduction|the wild-type (wt) control strain	-	BIOGRID
914243	2539688	2543544	276243	279961	SPBC146.06c	SPAC664.07c	fan1	rad9	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth[resistance to chemicals]	When exposed to increasing doses of cisplatin|in viability compared to the corresponding single mutants or|the  double mutant showed a dramatic reduction|the wild-type (wt) control strain	-	BIOGRID
914244	2541580	2541503	278077	278005	SPAC1687.05	SPAC22A12.01c	pli1	pso2	-	SPAC56F8.17c|snm1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth[resistance to chemicals]	When exposed to increasing doses of cisplatin|in viability compared to the corresponding single mutants or|the  double mutant showed a dramatic reduction|the wild-type (wt) control strain	-	BIOGRID
914245	2541503	2541580	278005	278077	SPAC22A12.01c	SPAC1687.05	pso2	pli1	SPAC56F8.17c|snm1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth[resistance to chemicals]	Double mutants (background: fan1-d mutant) that showed progressive increased sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914246	2541503	2542558	278005	279014	SPAC22A12.01c	SPAC1952.07	pso2	rad1	SPAC56F8.17c|snm1	rad19	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth[resistance to chemicals]	Double mutants (background: fan1-d mutant) that showed progressive increased sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914247	2541503	2541051	278005	277566	SPAC22A12.01c	SPBC3E7.08c	pso2	rad13	SPAC56F8.17c|snm1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth[resistance to chemicals]	Double mutants (background: fan1-d mutant) that showed progressive increased sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914248	2541503	2541746	278005	278240	SPAC22A12.01c	SPAC20G4.04c	pso2	hus1	SPAC56F8.17c|snm1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth[resistance to chemicals]	Double mutants (background: fan1-d mutant) that showed progressive increased sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914249	2541503	2542234	278005	278706	SPAC22A12.01c	SPAC9E9.14	pso2	vps24	SPAC56F8.17c|snm1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth[resistance to chemicals]	Double mutants (background: fan1-d mutant) that showed progressive increased sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914250	2541503	2541643	278005	278139	SPAC22A12.01c	SPAC14C4.13	pso2	rad17	SPAC56F8.17c|snm1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth[resistance to chemicals]	Double mutants (background: fan1-d mutant) that showed progressive increased sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914251	2541503	2541560	278005	278059	SPAC22A12.01c	SPAC24B11.12c	pso2	SPAC24B11.12c	SPAC56F8.17c|snm1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth[resistance to chemicals]	Double mutants (background: fan1-d mutant) that showed progressive increased sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914252	2541503	2542925	278005	279366	SPAC22A12.01c	SPAC11E3.04c	pso2	ubc13	SPAC56F8.17c|snm1	spu13|sst5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth[resistance to chemicals]	Double mutants (background: fan1-d mutant) that showed progressive increased sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914253	2541503	2538775	278005	275357	SPAC22A12.01c	SPCC23B6.05c	pso2	ssb3	SPAC56F8.17c|snm1	rpa3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth[resistance to chemicals]	Double mutants (background: fan1-d mutant) that showed progressive increased sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914254	2541503	2543624	278005	280038	SPAC22A12.01c	SPAC4D7.06c	pso2	SPAC4D7.06c	SPAC56F8.17c|snm1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth[resistance to chemicals]	Double mutants (background: fan1-d mutant) that showed progressive increased sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914255	2539688	2543005	276243	279443	SPBC146.06c	SPAC11D3.18c	fan1	SPAC11D3.18c	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914256	2539688	2542756	276243	279206	SPBC146.06c	SPAC15A10.16	fan1	bud6	SPBC146.06c	SPAC15E1.01|aip3|fat1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914257	2539688	2542137	276243	278613	SPBC146.06c	SPAC1D4.13	fan1	byr1	SPBC146.06c	ste1|ste3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914258	2539688	2541818	276243	278309	SPBC146.06c	SPAC11G7.02	fan1	pub1	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914259	2539688	2540185	276243	276718	SPBC146.06c	SPBC13E7.04	fan1	atp16	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914260	2539688	2542365	276243	278829	SPBC146.06c	SPAC13C5.03	fan1	tht1	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914261	2539688	2541127	276243	277642	SPBC146.06c	SPBC651.02	fan1	SPBC651.02	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914262	2539688	2540788	276243	277307	SPBC146.06c	SPBC18H10.06c	fan1	swd2	SPBC146.06c	swd2.1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914263	2539688	2539688	276243	276243	SPBC146.06c	SPBC146.06c	fan1	fan1	SPBC146.06c	SPBC146.06c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914264	2539688	2540648	276243	277173	SPBC146.06c	SPBC1921.05	fan1	ape2	SPBC146.06c	ape1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914265	2539688	2540414	276243	276942	SPBC146.06c	SPBC24C6.06	fan1	gpa1	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914266	2539688	2540612	276243	277138	SPBC146.06c	SPBC1D7.05	fan1	byr2	SPBC146.06c	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914267	2539688	2540760	276243	277280	SPBC146.06c	SPBC21.05c	fan1	ral2	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914268	2539688	2542436	276243	278898	SPBC146.06c	SPACUNK4.12c	fan1	iph1	SPBC146.06c	mug138|irp1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914269	2539688	2541518	276243	278019	SPBC146.06c	SPAC23E2.03c	fan1	ste7	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914270	2539688	2540133	276243	276670	SPBC146.06c	SPBC3B8.02	fan1	php5	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914271	2539688	2542775	276243	279224	SPBC146.06c	SPAC15E1.05c	fan1	ect1	SPBC146.06c	SPAC15E1.05c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914272	2539688	2543327	276243	279750	SPBC146.06c	SPAC1D4.06c	fan1	csk1	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914273	2539688	2539392	276243	275957	SPBC146.06c	SPCC1795.06	fan1	map2	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914274	2539688	2542079	276243	278556	SPBC146.06c	SPAP7G5.04c	fan1	lys1	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914275	2539688	2542764	276243	279214	SPBC146.06c	SPAC15E1.10	fan1	SPAC15E1.10	SPBC146.06c	SPAP7G5.01	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914276	2539688	2543685	276243	280099	SPBC146.06c	SPAC3C7.03c	fan1	rad55	SPBC146.06c	rhp55	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914277	2539688	2538731	276243	275315	SPBC146.06c	SPCC1393.10	fan1	ctr4	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914278	2539688	2541337	276243	277848	SPBC146.06c	SPBP35G2.13c	fan1	swc2	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914279	2539688	2541677	276243	278173	SPBC146.06c	SPAC1565.04c	fan1	ste4	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914280	2539688	2542982	276243	279420	SPBC146.06c	SPAC10F6.12c	fan1	mam4	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914281	2539688	2542735	276243	279185	SPBC146.06c	SPAC25B8.18	fan1	SPAC25B8.18	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914282	2539688	2540161	276243	276696	SPBC146.06c	SPBC13E7.03c	fan1	SPBC13E7.03c	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914283	2539688	2542475	276243	278935	SPBC146.06c	SPAC1F12.02c	fan1	SPAC1F12.02c	SPBC146.06c	p23fy	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914284	2539688	2540351	276243	276880	SPBC146.06c	SPBC2G2.10c	fan1	mug110	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914285	2539688	2542788	276243	279237	SPBC146.06c	SPAC15A10.15	fan1	sgo2	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914286	2539688	2542805	276243	279253	SPBC146.06c	SPAC15A10.08	fan1	ain1	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914287	2539688	2538701	276243	275286	SPBC146.06c	SPCC1235.09	fan1	hif2	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914288	2539688	2542170	276243	278645	SPBC146.06c	SPAC17G8.13c	fan1	mst2	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
914289	2539688	2542136	276243	278612	SPBC146.06c	SPAC17A2.06c	fan1	vps8	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin|synthetic sick and synthetic sick / lethal (SS/SL)	-	BIOGRID
914290	2539688	2539366	276243	275932	SPBC146.06c	SPCC16C4.11	fan1	pef1	SPBC146.06c	p31	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin|synthetic sick and synthetic sick / lethal (SS/SL)	-	BIOGRID
914291	2539688	2540683	276243	277208	SPBC146.06c	SPBC19G7.04	fan1	SPBC19G7.04	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin|synthetic sick and synthetic sick / lethal (SS/SL)	-	BIOGRID
914292	2539688	2540068	276243	276606	SPBC146.06c	SPBC1734.12c	fan1	alg12	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin|synthetic sick and synthetic sick / lethal (SS/SL)	-	BIOGRID
914293	2539688	2542637	276243	279091	SPBC146.06c	SPAC24H6.03	fan1	cul3	SPBC146.06c	pcu3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin|synthetic sick and synthetic sick / lethal (SS/SL)	-	BIOGRID
914294	2539688	2539820	276243	276370	SPBC146.06c	SPBC1709.13c	fan1	set10	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin|synthetic sick and synthetic sick / lethal (SS/SL)	-	BIOGRID
914295	2539688	2539095	276243	275667	SPBC146.06c	SPCC584.13	fan1	SPCC584.13	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin|synthetic sick and synthetic sick / lethal (SS/SL)	-	BIOGRID
914296	2539688	2541067	276243	277582	SPBC146.06c	SPBC337.07c	fan1	ecm14	SPBC146.06c	SPBC337.07c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin|synthetic sick and synthetic sick / lethal (SS/SL)	-	BIOGRID
914297	2539688	2543304	276243	279728	SPBC146.06c	SPAC6B12.12	fan1	tom70	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin|synthetic sick and synthetic sick / lethal (SS/SL)	-	BIOGRID
914298	2539688	2539772	276243	276323	SPBC146.06c	SPBC1734.05c	fan1	spf31	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin|synthetic sick and synthetic sick / lethal (SS/SL)	-	BIOGRID
914299	2539688	2541678	276243	278174	SPBC146.06c	SPAP7G5.05	fan1	rpl1002	SPBC146.06c	rpl10|rpl10-2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin|synthetic sick and synthetic sick / lethal (SS/SL)	-	BIOGRID
914300	2539688	2539999	276243	276543	SPBC146.06c	SPBC1734.15	fan1	rsc4	SPBC146.06c	brd1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	inviable[resistance to chemicals]	sensitivity to cisplatin|synthetic sick and synthetic sick / lethal (SS/SL)	-	BIOGRID
914301	2539688	2541531	276243	278031	SPBC146.06c	SPAC25A8.01c	fan1	fft3	SPBC146.06c	snf2SR	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
914302	2539688	5802786	276243	857924	SPBC146.06c	SPBC29A3.21	fan1	SPBC29A3.21	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
914303	2539688	2539056	276243	275629	SPBC146.06c	SPCC126.11c	fan1	SPCC126.11c	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
914304	2539688	2542649	276243	279103	SPBC146.06c	SPAC24C9.14	fan1	otu1	SPBC146.06c	mug141	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
914305	2539688	2541407	276243	277915	SPBC146.06c	SPBPB2B2.10c	fan1	gal7	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
914306	2539688	2542952	276243	279392	SPBC146.06c	SPAC12B10.05	fan1	icp55	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
914307	2539688	2543448	276243	279868	SPBC146.06c	SPAC3H5.07	fan1	rpl702	SPBC146.06c	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
914308	2539688	2542851	276243	279297	SPBC146.06c	SPAC13G7.05	fan1	are1	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
914309	2539688	2540676	276243	277201	SPBC146.06c	SPBC3E7.11c	fan1	SPBC3E7.11c	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
914310	2539688	2541339	276243	277850	SPBC146.06c	SPBP4G3.02	fan1	pho1	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
914311	2539688	2539108	276243	275680	SPBC146.06c	SPCC1223.02	fan1	nmt1	SPBC146.06c	thi3	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
914312	2539688	2539160	276243	275732	SPBC146.06c	SPCC18.17c	fan1	SPCC18.17c	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
914313	2539688	2542299	276243	278766	SPBC146.06c	SPAC18B11.10	fan1	tup11	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
914314	2539688	2542252	276243	278722	SPBC146.06c	SPAC17A2.13c	fan1	rad25	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
914315	2539688	2540846	276243	277363	SPBC146.06c	SPBC428.14	fan1	SPBC428.14	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
914316	2539688	2543173	276243	279603	SPBC146.06c	SPAC323.01c	fan1	pos5	SPBC146.06c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fontebasso Y (2013)	24192486	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
914317	2540473	6198	277001	112112	SPBC30D10.10c	-	tor1	RPS6KB1	-	PS6K|S6K|S6K-beta-1|S6K1|STK14A|p70 S6KA|p70(S6K)-alpha|p70-S6K|p70-alpha	Biochemical Activity	physical	Halova L (2013)	24247430	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	hit species unclear	-	BIOGRID
914336	2542244	2542313	278714	278779	SPAC19G12.13c	SPAC16A10.07c	poz1	taz1	-	myb|myb1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chang YT (2013)	24244195	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth[temperature sensitive growth]	-	-	BIOGRID
914337	2540115	2542313	276652	278779	SPBC1778.02	SPAC16A10.07c	rap1	taz1	-	myb|myb1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chang YT (2013)	24244195	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth[temperature sensitive growth]	-	-	BIOGRID
914338	2540361	2540589	276890	277115	SPBC2F12.13	SPBC20F10.06	klp5	mad2	sot1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Syrovatkina V (2013)	24239120	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spindle morphology	-	-	BIOGRID
914339	2542489	2540589	278948	277115	SPAC589.08c	SPBC20F10.06	dam1	mad2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Syrovatkina V (2013)	24239120	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spindle morphology	-	-	BIOGRID
918473	2538902	2542738	275480	279188	SPCC13B11.01	SPAC25B8.19c	adh1	loz1	adh	SPAC25B8.19c|SPAC683.01c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Corkins ME (2013)	24003116	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	mutation of loz1 partially rescues the sensitivity to Antimycin A seen in an adh1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
918474	2538902	2542714	275480	279167	SPCC13B11.01	SPAC5H10.06c	adh1	adh4	adh	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Corkins ME (2013)	24003116	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of adh4 partially rescues the sensitivity to Antimycin A seen in an adh1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
918494	2540730	2541929	277253	278417	SPBC19C2.09	SPAC23C4.12	sre1	hhp2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Brookheart RT (2013)	24327658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chemical compound accumulation	sre1N allele; increased ergosterol accumulation in the presence of oxygen	-	BIOGRID
918497	2541929	2540730	278417	277253	SPAC23C4.12	SPBC19C2.09	hhp2	sre1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Brookheart RT (2013)	24327658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Sre1N, but not the Sre1 precursor protein, binds to Hhp2	-	BIOGRID
918498	2541929	2540730	278417	277253	SPAC23C4.12	SPBC19C2.09	hhp2	sre1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Brookheart RT (2013)	24327658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	Sre1N form is phosphorylated by Hhp2	-	BIOGRID
918499	2541929	2541929	278417	278417	SPAC23C4.12	SPAC23C4.12	hhp2	hhp2	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Brookheart RT (2013)	24327658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
918518	2541714	2539455	278209	276018	SPAC30.03c	SPCC736.09c	tsn1	SPCC736.09c	mug90|tsn	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Eliahoo E (2013)	24382491	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
918519	2541714	2539818	278209	276368	SPAC30.03c	SPBC11C11.08	tsn1	srp1	mug90|tsn	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Eliahoo E (2013)	24382491	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
918520	2541714	2543009	278209	279447	SPAC30.03c	SPAC10F6.06	tsn1	vip1	mug90|tsn	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Eliahoo E (2013)	24382491	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
918521	2539818	2541714	276368	278209	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC30.03c	srp1	tsn1	-	mug90|tsn	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Eliahoo E (2013)	24382491	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
918522	2543009	2541714	279447	278209	SPAC10F6.06	SPAC30.03c	vip1	tsn1	-	mug90|tsn	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Eliahoo E (2013)	24382491	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
918553	2543001	2541612	279439	278109	SPAC1006.08	SPAC1F7.04	etd1	rho1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Alcaide-Gavilan M (2013)	24336750	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis|vegetative growth	Rho1 expressed from the nmt41x promoter in a plasmid	-	BIOGRID
918554	2543001	2541022	279439	277537	SPAC1006.08	SPBC3F6.05	etd1	rga1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Alcaide-Gavilan M (2013)	24336750	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
918555	2543001	2539707	279439	276260	SPAC1006.08	SPBC17F3.01c	etd1	rga5	-	SPBC557.01	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Alcaide-Gavilan M (2013)	24336750	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
918558	2543001	2539580	279439	276139	SPAC1006.08	SPCC645.07	etd1	rgf1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Alcaide-Gavilan M (2013)	24336750	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
918559	2543001	2539437	279439	276000	SPAC1006.08	SPCC645.06c	etd1	rgf3	-	lad1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Alcaide-Gavilan M (2013)	24336750	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
918562	2543001	2541612	279439	278109	SPAC1006.08	SPAC1F7.04	etd1	rho1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Alcaide-Gavilan M (2013)	24336750	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
918563	2543001	2541519	279439	278020	SPAC1006.08	SPAC227.07c	etd1	pab1	-	ret1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Alcaide-Gavilan M (2013)	24336750	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein activity	pab1-4 allele; increased beta-glucan synthase activity in double mutant	-	BIOGRID
918564	2543560	2542077	279976	278554	SPAC664.03	SPAC27D7.14c	paf1	tpr1	SPAC664.03	SPAC637.02c|ctr9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mbogning J (2013)	24385927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
918565	2543560	2539726	279976	276278	SPAC664.03	SPBC13E7.08c	paf1	leo1	SPAC664.03	SPBC13E7.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mbogning J (2013)	24385927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
918566	2543560	2539616	279976	276174	SPAC664.03	SPBC17G9.02c	paf1	cdc73	SPAC664.03	SPBC17G9.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mbogning J (2013)	24385927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
918567	2542077	2539726	278554	276278	SPAC27D7.14c	SPBC13E7.08c	tpr1	leo1	SPAC637.02c|ctr9	SPBC13E7.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mbogning J (2013)	24385927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
918568	2542077	2543560	278554	279976	SPAC27D7.14c	SPAC664.03	tpr1	paf1	SPAC637.02c|ctr9	SPAC664.03	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mbogning J (2013)	24385927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
918569	2542077	2539616	278554	276174	SPAC27D7.14c	SPBC17G9.02c	tpr1	cdc73	SPAC637.02c|ctr9	SPBC17G9.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mbogning J (2013)	24385927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
918570	2541916	2541123	278406	277638	SPAC23C4.19	SPBC651.09c	spt5	prf1	-	SPBC651.09c|rtf1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Mbogning J (2013)	24385927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	binding enhanced by phosphorylation of Spt5 at Thr1	-	BIOGRID
918571	2541123	2540239	277638	276771	SPBC651.09c	SPBC32H8.10	prf1	cdk9	SPBC651.09c|rtf1	SPACTOKYO_453.22	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mbogning J (2013)	24385927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology	cdk9as or cdk9-T212A allele; cells containing cdk9as allele were treated with 3-MB-PP1 to inhibit Cdk9; cell morphology and septation phenotypes suppressed	-	BIOGRID
918572	2539523	2539616	276085	276174	SPCC622.09	SPBC17G9.02c	htb1	cdc73	-	SPBC17G9.02c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mbogning J (2013)	24385927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	htb1-K119R allele; aberrant septation suppressed	-	BIOGRID
918573	2539307	2539616	275874	276174	SPCC970.10c	SPBC17G9.02c	brl2	cdc73	rfp1	SPBC17G9.02c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mbogning J (2013)	24385927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	aberrant septation suppressed	-	BIOGRID
918574	2541123	2539616	277638	276174	SPBC651.09c	SPBC17G9.02c	prf1	cdc73	SPBC651.09c|rtf1	SPBC17G9.02c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mbogning J (2013)	24385927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	aberrant septation suppressed	-	BIOGRID
918575	2539307	2540239	275874	276771	SPCC970.10c	SPBC32H8.10	brl2	cdk9	rfp1	SPACTOKYO_453.22	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Mbogning J (2013)	24385927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals[mycophenolic acid]	cdk9-T212A allele; increased sensitivity to nucleoside biosynthesis inhibitor mycophenolic acid (MPA)	-	BIOGRID
918576	2541123	2541451	277638	277956	SPBC651.09c	SPAC23G3.02c	prf1	sib1	SPBC651.09c|rtf1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mbogning J (2013)	24385927	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
918577	2541123	2541693	277638	278189	SPBC651.09c	SPAP8A3.05	prf1	ski7	SPBC651.09c|rtf1	SPAP8A3.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mbogning J (2013)	24385927	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
918578	2541123	2542749	277638	279199	SPBC651.09c	SPAC15A10.03c	prf1	rad54	SPBC651.09c|rtf1	rhp54	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mbogning J (2013)	24385927	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
918579	2541123	2541700	277638	278196	SPBC651.09c	SPAC32A11.02c	prf1	SPAC32A11.02c	SPBC651.09c|rtf1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mbogning J (2013)	24385927	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
918580	2541123	2543084	277638	279517	SPBC651.09c	SPAC31G5.19	prf1	abo1	SPBC651.09c|rtf1	SPAC31G5.19	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mbogning J (2013)	24385927	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
918581	2541123	2541685	277638	278181	SPBC651.09c	SPAC1039.05c	prf1	klf1	SPBC651.09c|rtf1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mbogning J (2013)	24385927	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
918582	2541123	2542842	277638	279288	SPBC651.09c	SPAC140.01	prf1	sdh2	SPBC651.09c|rtf1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mbogning J (2013)	24385927	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
918583	2541123	2540467	277638	276995	SPBC651.09c	SPBC2G2.07c	prf1	mug178	SPBC651.09c|rtf1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mbogning J (2013)	24385927	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
918584	2542077	2541451	278554	277956	SPAC27D7.14c	SPAC23G3.02c	tpr1	sib1	SPAC637.02c|ctr9	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mbogning J (2013)	24385927	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
918585	2542077	2541853	278554	278344	SPAC27D7.14c	SPAC2F3.11	tpr1	SPAC2F3.11	SPAC637.02c|ctr9	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mbogning J (2013)	24385927	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
918586	2542077	2541693	278554	278189	SPAC27D7.14c	SPAP8A3.05	tpr1	ski7	SPAC637.02c|ctr9	SPAP8A3.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mbogning J (2013)	24385927	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
918587	2542077	2541700	278554	278196	SPAC27D7.14c	SPAC32A11.02c	tpr1	SPAC32A11.02c	SPAC637.02c|ctr9	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mbogning J (2013)	24385927	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
918588	2542077	2543084	278554	279517	SPAC27D7.14c	SPAC31G5.19	tpr1	abo1	SPAC637.02c|ctr9	SPAC31G5.19	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mbogning J (2013)	24385927	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
918589	2542077	2541739	278554	278233	SPAC27D7.14c	SPAC2G11.10c	tpr1	SPAC2G11.10c	SPAC637.02c|ctr9	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mbogning J (2013)	24385927	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
918590	2542077	2542629	278554	279083	SPAC27D7.14c	SPAC24H6.07	tpr1	rps901	SPAC637.02c|ctr9	rps9-1|rps9a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mbogning J (2013)	24385927	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
918591	2542077	2540937	278554	277453	SPAC27D7.14c	SPBC359.05	tpr1	abc3	SPAC637.02c|ctr9	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mbogning J (2013)	24385927	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
918592	2542077	2543118	278554	279550	SPAC27D7.14c	SPAC3G6.11	tpr1	chl1	SPAC637.02c|ctr9	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mbogning J (2013)	24385927	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
918593	2542077	2542842	278554	279288	SPAC27D7.14c	SPAC140.01	tpr1	sdh2	SPAC637.02c|ctr9	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mbogning J (2013)	24385927	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
918594	2542077	2540467	278554	276995	SPAC27D7.14c	SPBC2G2.07c	tpr1	mug178	SPAC637.02c|ctr9	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mbogning J (2013)	24385927	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
919352	2539817	2540541	276367	277068	SPBC146.03c	SPBC1A4.03c	cut3	top2	smc4	ptr11	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Robellet X (2013)	24362309	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	top2-250 and cut3-477 alleles	-	BIOGRID
919353	2539817	2541540	276367	278040	SPBC146.03c	SPAC1071.06	cut3	arp9	smc4	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Robellet X (2013)	24362309	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	cut3-477 allele; 32 deg C.	-	BIOGRID
919354	2539817	2541422	276367	277928	SPBC146.03c	SPAC2F7.07c	cut3	cph2	smc4	rco1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Robellet X (2013)	24362309	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	cut3-477 allele; 32 deg C.	-	BIOGRID
919355	2539817	2542268	276367	278737	SPBC146.03c	SPAC17A5.07c	cut3	ulp2	smc4	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Robellet X (2013)	24362309	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	cut3-477 allele; 32 deg C.	-	BIOGRID
919356	2539817	2540272	276367	276803	SPBC146.03c	SPBC31F10.09c	cut3	nut2	smc4	med10	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Robellet X (2013)	24362309	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation|vegetative growth	cut3-477 allele; 34 deg C.	-	BIOGRID
919357	2539817	2541319	276367	277831	SPBC146.03c	SPBP4H10.06c	cut3	cut14	smc4	smc2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Robellet X (2013)	24362309	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	cut3-477 allele; 32 deg C.	-	BIOGRID
919358	2539817	2541201	276367	277715	SPBC146.03c	SPBC776.13	cut3	cnd1	smc4	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Robellet X (2013)	24362309	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	cut3-477 allele; 32 deg C.	-	BIOGRID
919359	2539817	2539121	276367	275693	SPBC146.03c	SPCC188.03	cut3	cnd3	smc4	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Robellet X (2013)	24362309	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	cut3-477 allele; 32 deg C.	-	BIOGRID
919360	2539817	3361036	276367	280112	SPBC146.03c	SPCC320.13c	cut3	ark1	smc4	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Robellet X (2013)	24362309	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	cut3-477 allele; 32 deg C.	-	BIOGRID
919361	2539817	2542638	276367	279092	SPBC146.03c	SPAC1250.01	cut3	snf21	smc4	SPAC29A4.21|brg1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Robellet X (2013)	24362309	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	cut3-477 allele; 32 deg C.	-	BIOGRID
919362	2542231	2541149	278704	277664	SPAC19G12.14	SPBC651.03c	its3	gyp10	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Li C (2013)	24350606	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	lethality of its3 overexpression is suppressed by overexpression of gyp10	-	BIOGRID
919365	2542219	2541149	278693	277664	SPAC18G6.03	SPBC651.03c	ypt3	gyp10	-	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Li C (2013)	24350606	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	overexpression of gyp10 inhibits growth	-	BIOGRID
919366	2543529	2541149	279947	277664	SPAC4C5.02c	SPBC651.03c	ryh1	gyp10	hos1|sat7	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Li C (2013)	24350606	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	overexpression of gyp10 inhibits growth	-	BIOGRID
919367	2542231	2542219	278704	278693	SPAC19G12.14	SPAC18G6.03	its3	ypt3	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Li C (2013)	24350606	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	lethality induced by Its3 overproduction is suppressed	-	BIOGRID
919368	2542231	2543529	278704	279947	SPAC19G12.14	SPAC4C5.02c	its3	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Li C (2013)	24350606	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	lethality induced by Its3 overproduction is suppressed	-	BIOGRID
926925	2540580	2540084	277106	276622	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC119.11c	ran1	pac1	pat1	hcs|rnt1|snm1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Rotondo G (1995)	7616961	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	overexpression of pac1 rescues lethality at high temp of ran1-114	-	BIOGRID
927263	2540554	2538959	277081	275533	SPBC29A10.03c	SPCC18B5.11c	pcf1	cds1	SPBC365.19c|rlf2	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Kunoh T (2014)	24478943	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	overexpression of cds1 from the nmt1 promoter (under activating, thiamine-free, conditions) causes a growth defect in a pcf1 null mutant	-	BIOGRID
927264	2538959	2540554	275533	277081	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC29A10.03c	cds1	pcf1	-	SPBC365.19c|rlf2	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Kunoh T (2014)	24478943	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	overexpression of pcf1 from the nmt1 promoter (under activating, thiamine-free, conditions) causes a growth defect in a cds1 null mutant	-	BIOGRID
927265	2540368	2540554	276897	277081	SPBC36.05c	SPBC29A10.03c	clr6	pcf1	-	SPBC365.19c|rlf2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kunoh T (2014)	24478943	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals[decreased^hydroxyurea]	clr6-1 allele; synthetic growth defect in the presence of hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
927266	2540368	2538959	276897	275533	SPBC36.05c	SPCC18B5.11c	clr6	cds1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kunoh T (2014)	24478943	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals[decreased^hydroxyurea]	clr6-1 allele; synthetic growth defect in the presence of hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
927267	2541200	2540554	277714	277081	SPBC8D2.03c	SPBC29A10.03c	hhf2	pcf1	ams3|h4.2	SPBC365.19c|rlf2	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Kunoh T (2014)	24478943	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	overexpression of pcf1 in an H4 K8A K16G mutant confers a growth defect	-	BIOGRID
927285	2543069	2542150	279502	278626	SPAC3A11.05c	SPAC17A5.11	kms1	rec12	-	spo11	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Guo H (2013)	24312672	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation	Ascus endolysis defect in kms1 or mus81 mutants was rescued by also deleting REC12; presumably through preventing formation of double-stranded breaks in DNA during meiosis	-	BIOGRID
927286	2539004	2542150	275578	278626	SPCC4G3.05c	SPAC17A5.11	mus81	rec12	slx3	spo11	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Guo H (2013)	24312672	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation	Ascus endolysis defect in kms1 or mus81 mutants was rescued by also deleting REC12; presumably through preventing formation of double-stranded breaks in DNA during meiosis	-	BIOGRID
927287	2543069	2539209	279502	275779	SPAC3A11.05c	SPCC23B6.03c	kms1	tel1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Guo H (2013)	24312672	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation	Ascus endolysis defect in kms1 mutants was rescued by deletion of ATM and ATR checkpoint kinases (TEL1, RAD3)	-	BIOGRID
927288	2543069	2540719	279502	277242	SPAC3A11.05c	SPBC216.05	kms1	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Guo H (2013)	24312672	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation	Ascus endolysis defect in kms1 mutants was rescued by deletion of ATM and ATR checkpoint kinases (TEL1, RAD3)	-	BIOGRID
927289	2543069	2539209	279502	275779	SPAC3A11.05c	SPCC23B6.03c	kms1	tel1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Guo H (2013)	24312672	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spore germination	Reduced spore germination observed in kms1 mutant progeny was exacerbated by deletion of ATM and ATR checkpoint kinases (TEL1, RAD3); kms1 tel1 or kms1 rad3 double mutants had much reduced germination of progeny	-	BIOGRID
927290	2543069	2540719	279502	277242	SPAC3A11.05c	SPBC216.05	kms1	rad3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Guo H (2013)	24312672	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spore germination	Reduced spore germination observed in kms1 mutant progeny was exacerbated by deletion of ATM and ATR checkpoint kinases (TEL1, RAD3); kms1 tel1 or kms1 rad3 double mutants had much reduced germination of progeny	-	BIOGRID
927311	2541867	2538986	278357	275560	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC895.06	sck2	elp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927312	2541867	2541720	278357	278214	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC23H3.13c	sck2	gpa2	-	git8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927313	2541867	2539974	278357	276518	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC32H8.07	sck2	git5	-	gpb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927314	2541867	2539366	278357	275932	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC16C4.11	sck2	pef1	-	p31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927315	2541867	2540060	278357	276598	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC106.01	sck2	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927316	2541867	2539388	278357	275953	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC24B10.12	sck2	cgi121	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927317	2541867	2540792	278357	277311	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC4F6.06	sck2	kin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927318	2541867	2538770	278357	275353	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC1753.02c	sck2	git3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927319	2541867	2540462	278357	276990	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC29A3.07c	sck2	sap14	-	sab14|SF3b14a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927320	2541867	2541496	278357	277998	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC23D3.09	sck2	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927321	2541867	2542469	278357	278930	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC19A8.04	sck2	erg5	-	cyp61	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927322	2541867	2540322	278357	276852	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC31F10.10c	sck2	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927323	2541867	2542458	278357	278919	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC30.02c	sck2	SPAC30.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927324	2541867	2539495	278357	276058	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC4F11.02	sck2	ptc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927325	2541867	2538973	278357	275547	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCPB16A4.02c	sck2	SPCPB16A4.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927326	2541867	2540307	278357	276837	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC1A4.01	sck2	apc10	-	SPBC1E8.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927327	2541867	2541017	278357	277532	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC36.07	sck2	elp1	-	iki3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927328	2541867	2539818	278357	276368	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC11C11.08	sck2	srp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927329	2541867	2539787	278357	276337	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC15C4.06c	sck2	SPBC15C4.06c	-	SPBC21H7.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927330	2541867	2543319	278357	279743	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC6B12.09	sck2	trm10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927331	2541867	2542816	278357	279263	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC4G8.11c	sck2	atp10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927332	2541867	2541488	278357	277990	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC227.17c	sck2	SPAC227.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927333	2541867	2542660	278357	279113	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC328.03	sck2	tps1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927334	2541867	2540787	278357	277306	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC1921.07c	sck2	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927335	2541867	2542140	278357	278616	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC1783.07c	sck2	pap1	-	caf3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927336	2541867	2541598	278357	278095	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC16.05c	sck2	sfp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927337	2541867	2542489	278357	278948	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC589.08c	sck2	dam1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927338	2541867	2539874	278357	276420	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC11B10.08	sck2	SPBC11B10.08	-	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927339	2541867	2543290	278357	279715	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC9E9.10c	sck2	cbh1	-	cbh	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927340	2541867	2542135	278357	278611	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC13A11.04c	sck2	ubp8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927341	2541867	2540699	278357	277223	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC800.08	sck2	gcd10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927342	2541867	2539958	278357	276502	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC1718.07c	sck2	zfs1	-	moc4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927343	2541867	2539180	278357	275751	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC16C4.09	sck2	sts5	-	orb4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927344	2541867	2542875	278357	279320	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC13G7.02c	sck2	ssa1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927345	2541867	2539527	278357	276089	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC338.16	sck2	pof3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927346	2541867	2543432	278357	279852	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC4G8.05	sck2	ppk14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927347	2541867	2539348	278357	275914	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC18B5.07c	sck2	nup61	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927348	2541867	2542175	278357	278650	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC1F3.02c	sck2	mkh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927349	2541867	2541990	278357	278474	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC20H4.02	sck2	dsc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927350	2541867	2538854	278357	275435	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCP1E11.05c	sck2	are2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927351	2541867	2540467	278357	276995	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC2G2.07c	sck2	mug178	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927352	2541867	2542145	278357	278621	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC17C9.09c	sck2	tim13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927353	2541867	2543448	278357	279868	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC3H5.07	sck2	rpl702	-	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927354	2541867	2539920	278357	276464	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC119.08	sck2	pmk1	-	spm1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927355	2541867	2540979	278357	277495	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC3H7.10	sck2	elp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927356	2541867	5802726	278357	857864	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC1223.15c	sck2	spc19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927357	2541867	2540382	278357	276911	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC27B12.05	sck2	SPBC27B12.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927358	2541867	2540425	278357	276953	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC27.06c	sck2	mgr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927359	2541867	2539260	278357	275830	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC285.11	sck2	dsc5	-	ucp10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927360	2541867	2541801	278357	278292	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC2F7.08c	sck2	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927361	2541867	2540551	278357	277078	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC23E6.01c	sck2	cxr1	-	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927362	2541867	2539845	278357	276393	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC12C2.02c	sck2	ste20	-	ste16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927363	2541867	2543662	278357	280076	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC9.07c	sck2	SPAC9.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927364	2541867	2539483	278357	276046	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC584.02	sck2	cuf2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927365	2541867	2540885	278357	277402	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC660.14	sck2	mik1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927366	2541867	2541379	278357	277890	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBP8B7.27	sck2	mug30	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927367	2541867	2540304	278357	276834	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC354.13	sck2	rga6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927368	2541867	2543674	278357	280088	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC637.13c	sck2	slm1	-	SPAC637.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927369	2541867	2540314	278357	276844	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC2G5.03	sck2	ctu1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927370	2541867	2542695	278357	279148	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC12B10.09	sck2	pet801	-	SPAC12B10.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927371	2541867	2540678	278357	277203	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC1A4.10c	sck2	pmc1	-	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927372	2541867	2542007	278357	278490	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC20H4.07	sck2	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927373	2541867	2539733	278357	276285	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC16E9.12c	sck2	pab2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927374	2541867	2543024	278357	279460	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC1039.02	sck2	SPAC1039.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927375	2541867	2541357	278357	277868	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBPB7E8.01	sck2	SPBPB7E8.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927376	2541867	2542222	278357	278695	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC31G5.18c	sck2	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927377	2541867	2540442	278357	276970	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC25B2.04c	sck2	mtg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927378	2541867	2541251	278357	277765	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC947.10	sck2	dsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927379	2541867	2539249	278357	275819	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC1450.05c	sck2	rox3	-	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927380	2541867	2541552	278357	278051	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC1142.08	sck2	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927381	2541867	2540910	278357	277426	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC577.02	sck2	rpl3801	-	rpl38-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927382	2541867	2538913	278357	275490	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC31H12.08c	sck2	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927383	2541867	2540896	278357	277412	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC19C2.13c	sck2	ctu2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927384	2541867	2539937	278357	276481	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC1539.08	sck2	arf6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927385	2541867	2541819	278357	278310	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC6G9.08	sck2	ubp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927386	2541867	2540800	278357	277319	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC409.20c	sck2	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927387	2541867	2540606	278357	277132	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC428.03c	sck2	pho4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927388	2541867	3361342	278357	280418	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC16D10.07c	sck2	sir2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927389	2541867	2541806	278357	278297	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC4G8.13c	sck2	prz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927390	2541867	2540673	278357	277198	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC1D7.03	sck2	mug80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927391	2541867	2539248	278357	275818	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC1739.03	sck2	hrr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927392	2541867	2541044	278357	277559	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC354.05c	sck2	sre2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927393	2541867	2541292	278357	277804	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBP23A10.16	sck2	sdh4	-	tim18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927394	2541867	2542627	278357	279081	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC750.04c	sck2	SPAC750.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927395	2541867	2540346	278357	276875	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC2F12.03c	sck2	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927396	2541867	2542036	278357	278518	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC23A1.19c	sck2	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927397	2541867	2541615	278357	278112	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC27D7.11c	sck2	SPAC27D7.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927398	2541867	2539481	278357	276044	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC622.16c	sck2	epe1	-	kdm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927399	2541867	2542255	278357	278725	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC57A7.08	sck2	pzh1	-	phz1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927400	2541867	2540831	278357	277349	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC428.02c	sck2	eca39	-	SPBC582.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927401	2541867	2540249	278357	276781	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC32F12.08c	sck2	duo1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927402	2541867	2541491	278357	277993	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC2C4.16c	sck2	rps801	-	rps8|rps8-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927403	2541867	2542186	278357	278661	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC17C9.14	sck2	SPAC17C9.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927404	2541867	2543337	278357	279760	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC959.08	sck2	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927405	2541867	2540727	278357	277250	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC1921.03c	sck2	mex67	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927406	2541867	2542262	278357	278731	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC17C9.10	sck2	stm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927407	2541867	2541374	278357	277885	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBPB10D8.06c	sck2	SPBPB10D8.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927408	2541867	2542492	278357	278951	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC1B9.02c	sck2	sck1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927409	2541867	2538848	278357	275429	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC613.12c	sck2	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927410	2541867	2542273	278357	278742	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC17H9.13c	sck2	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927411	2541867	2541013	278357	277528	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC3H7.13	sck2	far10	-	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927412	2541867	2540653	278357	277178	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC215.07c	sck2	SPBC215.07c	-	pdp2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927413	2541867	2542748	278357	279198	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC15A10.09c	sck2	pun1	-	SPAC15A10.09c|sur7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927414	2541867	2539773	278357	276324	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC14F5.08	sck2	med7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927415	2541867	2542582	278357	279037	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC19G12.02c	sck2	pms1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927416	2541867	2542981	278357	279419	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC824.02	sck2	bst1	-	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927417	2541867	2538841	278357	275422	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC550.03c	sck2	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927418	2541867	2540938	278357	277454	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC365.14c	sck2	uge1	-	gal10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927419	2541867	3361570	278357	280646	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC750.01	sck2	SPAC750.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927420	2541867	2542952	278357	279392	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC12B10.05	sck2	icp55	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927421	2541867	2542861	278357	279307	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC13G7.13c	sck2	msa1	-	SPAC6C3.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927422	2541867	2541809	278357	278300	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC22A12.11	sck2	dak1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927423	2541867	2543616	278357	280030	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC4A8.09c	sck2	cwf21	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927424	2541867	2543329	278357	279752	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC56F8.02	sck2	SPAC56F8.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927425	2541867	2540595	278357	277121	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC21C3.02c	sck2	dep1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927426	2541867	2541672	278357	278168	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC2F3.15	sck2	lsk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927427	2541867	2541671	278357	278167	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC10F6.14c	sck2	SPAC10F6.14c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927428	2541867	2540160	278357	276695	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC1773.17c	sck2	SPBC1773.17c	-	SPBP26C9.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927429	2541867	2542759	278357	279209	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC9G1.07	sck2	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927430	2541867	2542881	278357	279326	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC13F5.03c	sck2	gld1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927431	2541867	2539467	278357	276030	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC417.07c	sck2	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927432	2541867	2543443	278357	279863	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC3H1.12c	sck2	snt2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927433	2541867	2542023	278357	278506	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC20H4.10	sck2	ufd2	-	SPAC145.04	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927434	2541867	2539027	278357	275600	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC1322.08	sck2	srk1	-	mkp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927435	2541867	2539482	278357	276045	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC417.06c	sck2	mug27	-	ppk35|slk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927436	2541867	2539362	278357	275928	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC18B5.10c	sck2	SPCC18B5.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927437	2541867	2542277	278357	278746	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC17A5.02c	sck2	dbr1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927438	2541867	2539908	278357	276454	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC13E7.06	sck2	msd1	-	mug172	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927439	2541867	2542891	278357	279335	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC6F12.12	sck2	par2	-	pbp2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927440	2541867	2543376	278357	279798	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC3H1.06c	sck2	SPAC3H1.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927441	2541867	2542374	278357	278838	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC17H9.19c	sck2	cdt2	-	sev1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927442	2541867	2542938	278357	279379	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC6B12.08	sck2	mug185	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927443	2541867	2540352	278357	276881	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC215.03c	sck2	csn1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927444	2541867	2539208	278357	275778	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC1450.11c	sck2	cek1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927445	2541867	2542459	278357	278920	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC1D4.03c	sck2	aut12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927446	2541867	2539651	278357	276206	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC12D12.06	sck2	srb11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927447	2541867	2541349	278357	277860	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBP35G2.08c	sck2	air1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927448	2541867	2539576	278357	276136	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC794.01c	sck2	zwf2	-	SPCC794.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927449	2541867	2538993	278357	275567	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC162.12	sck2	tco89	-	SPCC1753.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927450	2541867	2541762	278357	278256	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC139.01c	sck2	SPAC139.01c	-	SPAC955.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927451	2541867	2540122	278357	276659	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC1778.03c	sck2	SPBC1778.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927452	2541867	2542976	278357	279414	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC9E9.09c	sck2	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927453	2541867	2540952	278357	277468	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC354.09c	sck2	SPBC354.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927454	2541867	2543580	278357	279995	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC644.14c	sck2	rad51	-	rhp51	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927455	2541867	2540150	278357	276687	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC16E9.14c	sck2	zrg17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927456	2541867	2540422	278357	276950	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC27.08c	sck2	sua1	-	SPBC28F2.01c|asp1|met3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927457	2541867	2543358	278357	279780	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC688.10	sck2	rev3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927458	2541867	2542519	278357	278977	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC19G12.08	sck2	scs7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927459	2541867	2541378	278357	277889	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBP8B7.21	sck2	ubp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927460	2541867	2543668	278357	280082	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC9.05	sck2	fml1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927461	2541867	2539673	278357	276228	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC13G1.10c	sck2	mug81	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927462	2541867	2541871	278357	278361	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC22F3.09c	sck2	res2	-	mcs1|pct1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927463	2541867	2540523	278357	277051	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC29A10.10c	sck2	dbl8	-	SPBC29A10.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927464	2541867	2541853	278357	278344	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC2F3.11	sck2	SPAC2F3.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927465	2541867	2541900	278357	278390	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC23H4.17c	sck2	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927466	2541867	2542826	278357	279273	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC13G6.09	sck2	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927467	2541867	2539379	278357	275945	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC188.02	sck2	par1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927468	2541867	2538775	278357	275357	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC23B6.05c	sck2	ssb3	-	rpa3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927469	2541867	2539381	278357	275947	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC1739.10	sck2	mug33	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927470	2541867	2540531	278357	277059	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC23E6.08	sck2	sat1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927471	2541867	2541009	278357	277524	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC428.04	sck2	apq12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927472	2541867	2543563	278357	279979	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC664.02c	sck2	arp8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927473	2541867	2540689	278357	277214	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC428.06c	sck2	rxt2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927474	2541867	2540664	278357	277189	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC215.02	sck2	bob1	-	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927475	2541867	2542237	278357	278709	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC19E9.02	sck2	fin1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927476	2541867	2543011	278357	279449	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC10F6.11c	sck2	atg17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927477	2541867	2542008	278357	278491	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC2G11.07c	sck2	ptc3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927478	2541867	2540533	278357	277061	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC29A10.16c	sck2	SPBC29A10.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927479	2541867	2538906	278357	275483	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC1259.03	sck2	rpa12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927480	2541867	2540866	278357	277383	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC4C3.12	sck2	sep1	-	SPBC4C3.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927481	2541867	2543106	278357	279538	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC3A11.13	sck2	SPAC3A11.13	-	SPAC3H5.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927482	2541867	2543378	278357	279800	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC3H8.07c	sck2	pac10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927483	2541867	2540342	278357	276871	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC2G2.01c	sck2	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927484	2541867	2541021	278357	277536	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC3B8.10c	sck2	nem1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927485	2541867	2541869	278357	278359	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC22F3.13	sck2	tsc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927486	2541867	2540751	278357	277273	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC20F10.10	sck2	psl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927487	2541867	2539375	278357	275941	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC4G3.11	sck2	mug154	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927488	2541867	2541885	278357	278375	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC22H10.03c	sck2	kap114	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927489	2541867	2542066	278357	278543	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC227.05	sck2	SPAC227.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927490	2541867	2539023	278357	275596	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC594.05c	sck2	spf1	-	spp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927491	2541867	2541889	278357	278379	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC2F7.03c	sck2	pom1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927492	2541867	2543339	278357	279762	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC630.13c	sck2	tsc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927493	2541867	2541284	278357	277797	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC947.08c	sck2	hip4	-	hpc2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927494	2541867	2538840	278357	275421	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC736.07c	sck2	SPCC736.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927495	2541867	2542497	278357	278956	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC1A6.04c	sck2	plb1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927496	2541867	2541776	278357	278270	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC23H3.05c	sck2	swd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927497	2541867	2538762	278357	275345	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC306.04c	sck2	set1	-	kmt2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927498	2541867	2539462	278357	276025	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC777.13	sck2	vps35	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927499	2541867	2541531	278357	278031	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC25A8.01c	sck2	fft3	-	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927500	2541867	2543304	278357	279728	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC6B12.12	sck2	tom70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927501	2541867	2539205	278357	275775	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC4B3.15	sck2	mid1	-	dmf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
927502	2541867	2539381	278357	275947	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC1739.10	sck2	mug33	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals[caffeine^increased^mTOR inhibitor]	increased resistance to rapamycin and caffeine	-	BIOGRID
927503	2541867	2542023	278357	278506	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC20H4.10	sck2	ufd2	-	SPAC145.04	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals[caffeine^increased^mTOR inhibitor]	increased resistance to rapamycin and caffeine	-	BIOGRID
927504	2541867	2542938	278357	279379	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC6B12.08	sck2	mug185	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals[caffeine^increased^mTOR inhibitor]	increased resistance to rapamycin and caffeine	-	BIOGRID
927505	2541867	2540422	278357	276950	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC27.08c	sck2	sua1	-	SPBC28F2.01c|asp1|met3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals[caffeine^increased^mTOR inhibitor]	increased resistance to rapamycin and caffeine	-	BIOGRID
927506	2541867	2539027	278357	275600	SPAC22E12.14c	SPCC1322.08	sck2	srk1	-	mkp1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals[caffeine^increased^mTOR inhibitor]	increased resistance to rapamycin and caffeine	-	BIOGRID
927507	2541867	2543339	278357	279762	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC630.13c	sck2	tsc2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals[caffeine^increased^mTOR inhibitor]	increased resistance to rapamycin and caffeine	-	BIOGRID
927508	2541867	2542881	278357	279326	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC13F5.03c	sck2	gld1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals[caffeine^increased^mTOR inhibitor]	increased resistance to rapamycin and caffeine	-	BIOGRID
927509	2541867	2540595	278357	277121	SPAC22E12.14c	SPBC21C3.02c	sck2	dep1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rallis C (2014)	24463365	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals[caffeine^increased^mTOR inhibitor]	increased resistance to rapamycin and caffeine	-	BIOGRID
927548	2540019	2539920	276563	276464	SPBC1685.01	SPBC119.08	pmp1	pmk1	dsp1	spm1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sacristan-Reviriego A (2014)	24465549	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	pmp1(C158S)	-	BIOGRID
927583	2542083	2538930	278560	275506	SPAC27E2.05	SPCC188.13c	cdc1	dcr1	mis1	SPCC584.10c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Smialowska A (2014)	24462781	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	dcr1 deletion partially suppressed growth defect of cdc1-M78 mutant at elevated temperature	-	BIOGRID
927656	2540719	2541635	277242	278131	SPBC216.05	SPAC1556.01c	rad3	rad50	-	SPAP4C9.01c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Deshpande RA (2014)	24493214	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	double mutant displays no H2A phosphorylation in response to ionizing radiation	-	BIOGRID
927657	2540719	2539209	277242	275779	SPBC216.05	SPCC23B6.03c	rad3	tel1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Deshpande RA (2014)	24493214	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	double mutant displays no H2A phosphorylation in response to ionizing radiation	-	BIOGRID
927708	2543629	2543289	280043	279714	SPAC3H5.06c	SPAC9E9.08	pol1	rad26	polA|swi7	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kai M (2003)	12514100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency	data not shown	-	BIOGRID
927709	2543629	2543358	280043	279780	SPAC3H5.06c	SPAC688.10	pol1	rev3	polA|swi7	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kai M (2003)	12514100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency:partial rescue	deletion of rev3 and DinB further suppresses the high mutation frequency seen in a swi7 mutant|deletion of rev3 or DinB partially suppresses the high mutation frequency seen in a swi7 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
927710	2543629	2539547	280043	276108	SPAC3H5.06c	SPCC553.07c	pol1	kpa1	polA|swi7	mug40|pol(kappa)|pol-kappa	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kai M (2003)	12514100	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency:partial rescue	deletion of rev3 and DinB further suppresses the high mutation frequency seen in a swi7 mutant|deletion of rev3 or DinB partially suppresses the high mutation frequency seen in a swi7 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
928007	2539843	2543026	276391	279462	SPBC16G5.11c	SPAC664.11	bag101	ssc1	bag1|bag1-a	ssp1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
928008	2540564	2543026	277091	279462	SPBC530.03c	SPAC664.11	bag102	ssc1	bag1-b	ssp1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
928009	2539843	2543040	276391	279475	SPBC16G5.11c	SPAC31G5.13	bag101	rpn11	bag1|bag1-a	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
928010	2540564	2543040	277091	279475	SPBC530.03c	SPAC31G5.13	bag102	rpn11	bag1-b	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
928048	2539843	2541268	276391	277782	SPBC16G5.11c	SPBP19A11.03c	bag101	mts4	bag1|bag1-a	rpn1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
928049	2540564	2541268	277091	277782	SPBC530.03c	SPBP19A11.03c	bag102	mts4	bag1-b	rpn1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
928050	2539155	2540564	275727	277091	SPCC1020.02	SPBC530.03c	spc7	bag102	-	bag1-b	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
928051	2539155	2543026	275727	279462	SPCC1020.02	SPAC664.11	spc7	ssc1	-	ssp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	interaction increased by expression of spc-23 mutant	-	BIOGRID
928052	2539155	2540939	275727	277455	SPCC1020.02	SPBC4.07c	spc7	rpt2	-	mts2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	mutation or deletion of mts2 or nas6 rescues spc7-23 growth and DNA segregation defects	-	BIOGRID
928053	2539155	2542919	275727	279360	SPCC1020.02	SPAC6C3.08	spc7	nas6	-	SPAC6C3.08	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	mutation or deletion of mts2 or nas6 rescues spc7-23 growth and DNA segregation defects	-	BIOGRID
928055	2539155	2540083	275727	276621	SPCC1020.02	SPBC119.02	spc7	ubc4	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	mutation of ubc4 rescues the temperature growth defect of an spc7-23 mutant	-	BIOGRID
928056	2539155	2542809	275727	279257	SPCC1020.02	SPAC15A10.11	spc7	ubr11	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	mutation of ubr11 or san1 rescues the temperature growth defect in an spc7-23 mutant	-	BIOGRID
928057	2539155	2540480	275727	277008	SPCC1020.02	SPBC2A9.04c	spc7	san1	-	SPBC2A9.04c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	mutation of ubr11 or san1 rescues the temperature growth defect in an spc7-23 mutant	-	BIOGRID
928058	2539155	2542770	275727	279220	SPCC1020.02	SPAC167.07c	spc7	hul5	-	SPAC167.07c|SPAC57A7.03c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	mutation of hul5 partially rescues the temperature growth defect in an spc7-23 mutant	-	BIOGRID
928059	2539155	2540764	275727	277284	SPCC1020.02	SPBC19C7.02	spc7	ubr1	-	SPBC32F12.14	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	double mutants show reduced growth	-	BIOGRID
928060	2542809	2539155	279257	275727	SPAC15A10.11	SPCC1020.02	ubr11	spc7	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	only the spc7-23 mutant	-	BIOGRID
928061	2540480	2539155	277008	275727	SPBC2A9.04c	SPCC1020.02	san1	spc7	SPBC2A9.04c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	only the spc7-23 mutant	-	BIOGRID
928062	2539155	2541378	275727	277889	SPCC1020.02	SPBP8B7.21	spc7	ubp3	-	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	overexpression of ubp3 exacerbates the growth defect seen in an spc7-23 mutant	-	BIOGRID
928063	2539155	2541378	275727	277889	SPCC1020.02	SPBP8B7.21	spc7	ubp3	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion or mutation of ubp3 suppresses the growth defect seen in an spc7-23 mutant	-	BIOGRID
928064	2541378	2541268	277889	277782	SPBP8B7.21	SPBP19A11.03c	ubp3	mts4	-	rpn1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
928065	2542304	2540480	278771	277008	SPAC1687.20c	SPBC2A9.04c	mis6	san1	-	SPBC2A9.04c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
928066	2542737	2540480	279187	277008	SPAC25B8.14	SPBC2A9.04c	mal2	san1	-	SPBC2A9.04c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
928067	2542304	2540083	278771	276621	SPAC1687.20c	SPBC119.02	mis6	ubc4	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
928068	2542737	2540083	279187	276621	SPAC25B8.14	SPBC119.02	mal2	ubc4	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
928069	2542304	2540564	278771	277091	SPAC1687.20c	SPBC530.03c	mis6	bag102	-	bag1-b	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
928070	2542737	2540564	279187	277091	SPAC25B8.14	SPBC530.03c	mal2	bag102	-	bag1-b	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
928071	2542737	2542809	279187	279257	SPAC25B8.14	SPAC15A10.11	mal2	ubr11	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
932621	2538846	2538846	275427	275427	SPCC1919.10c	SPCC1919.10c	myo52	myo52	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Clayton JE (2013)	24196839	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932622	2538846	2540051	275427	276589	SPCC1919.10c	SPBC32H8.12c	myo52	act1	-	cps8|pi012	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Clayton JE (2013)	24196839	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932624	2543116	2539050	279548	275623	SPAC3A11.08	SPCC11E10.08	pcu4	rik1	Cul-4|cul4	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kuscu C (2014)	24449894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932625	2543116	2539420	279548	275985	SPAC3A11.08	SPCC970.07c	pcu4	raf2	Cul-4|cul4	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kuscu C (2014)	24449894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932626	2539050	2538848	275623	275429	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC613.12c	rik1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kuscu C (2014)	24449894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932627	2539050	2539420	275623	275985	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC970.07c	rik1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kuscu C (2014)	24449894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932628	2539050	2543116	275623	279548	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC3A11.08	rik1	pcu4	-	Cul-4|cul4	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kuscu C (2014)	24449894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932629	2538848	2539420	275429	275985	SPCC613.12c	SPCC970.07c	raf1	raf2	clr8|cmc1|dos1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kuscu C (2014)	24449894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932630	2538848	2539050	275429	275623	SPCC613.12c	SPCC11E10.08	raf1	rik1	clr8|cmc1|dos1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kuscu C (2014)	24449894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932631	2539420	2538848	275985	275429	SPCC970.07c	SPCC613.12c	raf2	raf1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kuscu C (2014)	24449894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932632	2539420	2541372	275985	277883	SPCC970.07c	SPBP8B7.28c	raf2	stc1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kuscu C (2014)	24449894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932633	2539420	2543116	275985	279548	SPCC970.07c	SPAC3A11.08	raf2	pcu4	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Cul-4|cul4	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kuscu C (2014)	24449894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932634	2541372	2539420	277883	275985	SPBP8B7.28c	SPCC970.07c	stc1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kuscu C (2014)	24449894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932635	2541372	2539050	277883	275623	SPBP8B7.28c	SPCC11E10.08	stc1	rik1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kuscu C (2014)	24449894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932636	2539730	2542256	276282	278726	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC29A4.08c	lea1	prp19	-	cwf8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932637	2539730	2542531	276282	278989	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC3A12.11c	lea1	cwf2	-	prp3|cwc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932638	2539730	2542480	276282	278940	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC2C4.03c	lea1	smd2	-	cwf9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932639	2539730	2540328	276282	276858	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC31F10.11c	lea1	cwf4	-	syf3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932640	2539730	3361260	276282	280336	SPBC1861.08c	SPBP22H7.07	lea1	prp5	-	cwf1|pi024|SPACTOKYO_453.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932641	2539730	2543583	276282	279998	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC644.12	lea1	cdc5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932642	2539730	2540983	276282	277499	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC337.06c	lea1	cwf15	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932643	2539730	2541168	276282	277683	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC6B1.10	lea1	prp17	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932644	2539730	2540711	276282	277234	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC215.12	lea1	cwf10	-	snu114|spef2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932645	2539730	2543413	276282	279835	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC4F8.12c	lea1	spp42	-	cwf6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932646	2539730	2539035	276282	275608	SPBC1861.08c	SPCC794.09c	lea1	tef101	-	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932647	2539730	2540884	276282	277401	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC19C2.14	lea1	smd3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932648	2539730	2538901	276282	275479	SPBC1861.08c	SPCP1E11.07c	lea1	cwf18	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932649	2539730	2540547	276282	277074	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC32F12.11	lea1	tdh1	-	gpd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932650	2539730	2540753	276282	277274	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC211.02c	lea1	cwf3	-	syf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932651	2539730	2541124	276282	277639	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC646.02	lea1	cwf11	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932652	2539730	2538974	276282	275548	SPBC1861.08c	SPCC550.02c	lea1	cwf5	-	ecm2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932653	2539730	2539984	276282	276528	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC1289.11	lea1	spf38	-	cwf17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932654	2539730	2543189	276282	279618	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC30D11.09	lea1	cwf19	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932655	2539730	2543019	276282	279455	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC57A10.03	lea1	cyp1	-	cyp2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932656	2539730	2540330	276282	276860	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC3E7.14	lea1	smf1	-	SPBC4F6.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932657	2539730	2540585	276282	277111	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC28F2.04c	lea1	cwf7	-	spf27	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932658	2539730	2542690	276282	279143	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC27D7.07c	lea1	smd1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932659	2539730	2538988	276282	275562	SPBC1861.08c	SPCC188.11	lea1	prp45	-	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932660	2539730	2540230	276282	276762	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC32F12.05c	lea1	cwf12	-	isy1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932661	2539730	2540434	276282	276962	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC24C6.11	lea1	cwf14	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932662	2539730	2539730	276282	276282	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC1861.08c	lea1	lea1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932663	2539730	2540611	276282	277137	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC3E7.13c	lea1	syf2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932664	2539730	2542684	276282	279137	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC26A3.08	lea1	smb1	-	smb	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932665	2539730	2540855	276282	277372	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC4B4.05	lea1	smg1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932666	2539730	2540801	276282	277320	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC18H10.10c	lea1	saf4	-	cwc16|cwf16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932667	2539730	2540975	276282	277491	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC354.12	lea1	gpd3	-	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932668	2539730	2539225	276282	275795	SPBC1861.08c	SPCC1739.13	lea1	ssa2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932669	2539730	2541505	276282	278007	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC57A7.04c	lea1	pabp	-	pab1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932670	2539730	2540051	276282	276589	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC32H8.12c	lea1	act1	-	cps8|pi012	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932671	2539730	2538787	276282	275368	SPBC1861.08c	SPCC364.02c	lea1	bis1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932672	2539730	2543553	276282	279970	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC664.05	lea1	rpl13	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932673	2539730	2542222	276282	278695	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC31G5.18c	lea1	sde2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932674	2539730	2543676	276282	280090	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC9.03c	lea1	brr2	-	spp41	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932675	2539730	2540180	276282	276713	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC16D10.11c	lea1	rps1801	-	rps18-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932676	2539730	5802952	276282	858090	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC1F7.13c	lea1	rpl801	-	SPAC21E11.02c|rpk5a|rpl18|rpl2-1|rpl8-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932677	2539730	2542904	276282	279348	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC144.11	lea1	rps1102	-	rps11|rps11-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932678	2539730	2541344	276282	277855	SPBC1861.08c	SPBP8B7.03c	lea1	rpl402	-	rpl4|rpl4-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932679	2539730	2540057	276282	276595	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC16H5.10c	lea1	prp43	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932680	2539730	2541737	276282	278231	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC22H12.04c	lea1	rps102	-	rps1-2|rps3a-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932681	2539730	2542910	276282	279353	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC1486.03c	lea1	SPAC1486.03c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932682	2539730	2542263	276282	278732	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC17A2.08c	lea1	ntr2	-	SPAC17A2.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932683	2539730	2539701	276282	276254	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC106.18	lea1	rpl2501	-	rpl25a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932684	2539730	2539186	276282	275757	SPBC1861.08c	SPCC16C4.13c	lea1	rpl1201	-	rpl12-1|rpl12.1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932685	2539730	2539178	276282	275749	SPBC1861.08c	SPCC1682.14	lea1	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932686	2539730	2541609	276282	278106	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC22F8.10c	lea1	sap145	-	SF3b145	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932687	2539730	2543131	276282	279563	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC12G12.04	lea1	mcp60	-	hsp60	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932688	2539730	2539067	276282	275639	SPBC1861.08c	SPCC576.08c	lea1	rps2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932689	2539730	2542265	276282	278734	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC17A5.03	lea1	rpl301	-	rpl3|rpl3-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932690	2539730	2542093	276282	278570	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC26A3.04	lea1	rpl2002	-	rpl20|rpl20-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932691	2539730	2542553	276282	279010	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC18G6.14c	lea1	rps7	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932692	2539730	2542978	276282	279416	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC10F6.02c	lea1	prp22	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932693	2539730	2541461	276282	277963	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC1F3.09	lea1	mug161	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932694	2539730	2543453	276282	279873	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC3G9.03	lea1	rpl2301	-	rpl23-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932695	2539730	2539607	276282	276165	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC11G11.06c	lea1	sme1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932696	2539730	2539823	276282	276373	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC16A3.18	lea1	cip1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932697	2539730	2543354	276282	279776	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC521.05	lea1	rps802	-	rps8-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932698	2539730	2541619	276282	278116	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC27F1.09c	lea1	prp10	-	sap155|SF3b155	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932699	2539730	2538689	276282	275274	SPBC1861.08c	SPCC1795.11	lea1	sum3	-	ded1|moc2|slh3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932700	2539730	2543139	276282	279571	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC12G12.03	lea1	cip2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932701	2539730	2542912	276282	279355	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC1071.07c	lea1	rps1502	-	rps15|rps15-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932702	2539730	2539797	276282	276347	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC16G5.14c	lea1	rps3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932703	2539730	2543278	276282	279706	SPBC1861.08c	SPAPJ698.03c	lea1	prp12	-	sap130|SF3b130	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932704	2540711	2542256	277234	278726	SPBC215.12	SPAC29A4.08c	cwf10	prp19	snu114|spef2	cwf8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932705	2540711	2542531	277234	278989	SPBC215.12	SPAC3A12.11c	cwf10	cwf2	snu114|spef2	prp3|cwc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932706	2540711	2542480	277234	278940	SPBC215.12	SPAC2C4.03c	cwf10	smd2	snu114|spef2	cwf9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932707	2540711	2540328	277234	276858	SPBC215.12	SPBC31F10.11c	cwf10	cwf4	snu114|spef2	syf3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932708	2540711	3361260	277234	280336	SPBC215.12	SPBP22H7.07	cwf10	prp5	snu114|spef2	cwf1|pi024|SPACTOKYO_453.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932709	2540711	2543583	277234	279998	SPBC215.12	SPAC644.12	cwf10	cdc5	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932710	2540711	2540983	277234	277499	SPBC215.12	SPBC337.06c	cwf10	cwf15	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932711	2540711	2541168	277234	277683	SPBC215.12	SPBC6B1.10	cwf10	prp17	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932712	2540711	2543413	277234	279835	SPBC215.12	SPAC4F8.12c	cwf10	spp42	snu114|spef2	cwf6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932713	2540711	2539035	277234	275608	SPBC215.12	SPCC794.09c	cwf10	tef101	snu114|spef2	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932714	2540711	2540884	277234	277401	SPBC215.12	SPBC19C2.14	cwf10	smd3	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932715	2540711	2538901	277234	275479	SPBC215.12	SPCP1E11.07c	cwf10	cwf18	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932716	2540711	2540547	277234	277074	SPBC215.12	SPBC32F12.11	cwf10	tdh1	snu114|spef2	gpd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932717	2540711	2540753	277234	277274	SPBC215.12	SPBC211.02c	cwf10	cwf3	snu114|spef2	syf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932718	2540711	2541124	277234	277639	SPBC215.12	SPBC646.02	cwf10	cwf11	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932719	2540711	2538974	277234	275548	SPBC215.12	SPCC550.02c	cwf10	cwf5	snu114|spef2	ecm2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932720	2540711	2539984	277234	276528	SPBC215.12	SPBC1289.11	cwf10	spf38	snu114|spef2	cwf17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932721	2540711	2543189	277234	279618	SPBC215.12	SPAC30D11.09	cwf10	cwf19	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932722	2540711	2543019	277234	279455	SPBC215.12	SPAC57A10.03	cwf10	cyp1	snu114|spef2	cyp2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932723	2540711	2540330	277234	276860	SPBC215.12	SPBC3E7.14	cwf10	smf1	snu114|spef2	SPBC4F6.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932724	2540711	2540585	277234	277111	SPBC215.12	SPBC28F2.04c	cwf10	cwf7	snu114|spef2	spf27	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932725	2540711	2542690	277234	279143	SPBC215.12	SPAC27D7.07c	cwf10	smd1	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932726	2540711	2538988	277234	275562	SPBC215.12	SPCC188.11	cwf10	prp45	snu114|spef2	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932727	2540711	2540230	277234	276762	SPBC215.12	SPBC32F12.05c	cwf10	cwf12	snu114|spef2	isy1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932728	2540711	2540434	277234	276962	SPBC215.12	SPBC24C6.11	cwf10	cwf14	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932729	2540711	2539730	277234	276282	SPBC215.12	SPBC1861.08c	cwf10	lea1	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932730	2540711	2540611	277234	277137	SPBC215.12	SPBC3E7.13c	cwf10	syf2	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932731	2540711	2542684	277234	279137	SPBC215.12	SPAC26A3.08	cwf10	smb1	snu114|spef2	smb	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932732	2540711	2540855	277234	277372	SPBC215.12	SPBC4B4.05	cwf10	smg1	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932733	2540711	2540801	277234	277320	SPBC215.12	SPBC18H10.10c	cwf10	saf4	snu114|spef2	cwc16|cwf16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932734	2540711	2540975	277234	277491	SPBC215.12	SPBC354.12	cwf10	gpd3	snu114|spef2	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932735	2540711	2539225	277234	275795	SPBC215.12	SPCC1739.13	cwf10	ssa2	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932736	2540711	2541505	277234	278007	SPBC215.12	SPAC57A7.04c	cwf10	pabp	snu114|spef2	pab1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932737	2540711	2540051	277234	276589	SPBC215.12	SPBC32H8.12c	cwf10	act1	snu114|spef2	cps8|pi012	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932738	2540711	2538787	277234	275368	SPBC215.12	SPCC364.02c	cwf10	bis1	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932739	2540711	2543553	277234	279970	SPBC215.12	SPAC664.05	cwf10	rpl13	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932740	2540711	2542222	277234	278695	SPBC215.12	SPAC31G5.18c	cwf10	sde2	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932741	2540711	2543676	277234	280090	SPBC215.12	SPAC9.03c	cwf10	brr2	snu114|spef2	spp41	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932742	2540711	2540180	277234	276713	SPBC215.12	SPBC16D10.11c	cwf10	rps1801	snu114|spef2	rps18-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932743	2540711	5802952	277234	858090	SPBC215.12	SPAC1F7.13c	cwf10	rpl801	snu114|spef2	SPAC21E11.02c|rpk5a|rpl18|rpl2-1|rpl8-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932744	2540711	2542904	277234	279348	SPBC215.12	SPAC144.11	cwf10	rps1102	snu114|spef2	rps11|rps11-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932745	2540711	2541344	277234	277855	SPBC215.12	SPBP8B7.03c	cwf10	rpl402	snu114|spef2	rpl4|rpl4-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932746	2540711	2540057	277234	276595	SPBC215.12	SPBC16H5.10c	cwf10	prp43	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932747	2540711	2541737	277234	278231	SPBC215.12	SPAC22H12.04c	cwf10	rps102	snu114|spef2	rps1-2|rps3a-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932748	2540711	2542910	277234	279353	SPBC215.12	SPAC1486.03c	cwf10	SPAC1486.03c	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932749	2540711	2542263	277234	278732	SPBC215.12	SPAC17A2.08c	cwf10	ntr2	snu114|spef2	SPAC17A2.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932750	2540711	2539701	277234	276254	SPBC215.12	SPBC106.18	cwf10	rpl2501	snu114|spef2	rpl25a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932751	2540711	2539186	277234	275757	SPBC215.12	SPCC16C4.13c	cwf10	rpl1201	snu114|spef2	rpl12-1|rpl12.1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932752	2540711	2539178	277234	275749	SPBC215.12	SPCC1682.14	cwf10	rpl1902	snu114|spef2	rpl19-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932753	2540711	2541609	277234	278106	SPBC215.12	SPAC22F8.10c	cwf10	sap145	snu114|spef2	SF3b145	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932754	2540711	2543131	277234	279563	SPBC215.12	SPAC12G12.04	cwf10	mcp60	snu114|spef2	hsp60	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932755	2540711	2539067	277234	275639	SPBC215.12	SPCC576.08c	cwf10	rps2	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932756	2540711	2542265	277234	278734	SPBC215.12	SPAC17A5.03	cwf10	rpl301	snu114|spef2	rpl3|rpl3-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932757	2540711	2542093	277234	278570	SPBC215.12	SPAC26A3.04	cwf10	rpl2002	snu114|spef2	rpl20|rpl20-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932758	2540711	2542553	277234	279010	SPBC215.12	SPAC18G6.14c	cwf10	rps7	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932759	2540711	2542978	277234	279416	SPBC215.12	SPAC10F6.02c	cwf10	prp22	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932760	2540711	2541461	277234	277963	SPBC215.12	SPAC1F3.09	cwf10	mug161	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932761	2540711	2543453	277234	279873	SPBC215.12	SPAC3G9.03	cwf10	rpl2301	snu114|spef2	rpl23-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932762	2540711	2539607	277234	276165	SPBC215.12	SPBC11G11.06c	cwf10	sme1	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932763	2540711	2539823	277234	276373	SPBC215.12	SPBC16A3.18	cwf10	cip1	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932764	2540711	2543354	277234	279776	SPBC215.12	SPAC521.05	cwf10	rps802	snu114|spef2	rps8-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932765	2540711	2541619	277234	278116	SPBC215.12	SPAC27F1.09c	cwf10	prp10	snu114|spef2	sap155|SF3b155	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932766	2540711	2538689	277234	275274	SPBC215.12	SPCC1795.11	cwf10	sum3	snu114|spef2	ded1|moc2|slh3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932767	2540711	2543139	277234	279571	SPBC215.12	SPAC12G12.03	cwf10	cip2	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932768	2540711	2542912	277234	279355	SPBC215.12	SPAC1071.07c	cwf10	rps1502	snu114|spef2	rps15|rps15-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932769	2540711	2539797	277234	276347	SPBC215.12	SPBC16G5.14c	cwf10	rps3	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932770	2540711	2543278	277234	279706	SPBC215.12	SPAPJ698.03c	cwf10	prp12	snu114|spef2	sap130|SF3b130	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932775	2539730	2542256	276282	278726	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC29A4.08c	lea1	prp19	-	cwf8	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932776	2539730	2542531	276282	278989	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC3A12.11c	lea1	cwf2	-	prp3|cwc2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932777	2539730	2542480	276282	278940	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC2C4.03c	lea1	smd2	-	cwf9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932778	2539730	2540328	276282	276858	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC31F10.11c	lea1	cwf4	-	syf3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932779	2539730	3361260	276282	280336	SPBC1861.08c	SPBP22H7.07	lea1	prp5	-	cwf1|pi024|SPACTOKYO_453.10	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932780	2539730	2543583	276282	279998	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC644.12	lea1	cdc5	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932781	2539730	2540983	276282	277499	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC337.06c	lea1	cwf15	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932782	2539730	2541168	276282	277683	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC6B1.10	lea1	prp17	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932783	2539730	2540711	276282	277234	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC215.12	lea1	cwf10	-	snu114|spef2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932784	2539730	2543413	276282	279835	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC4F8.12c	lea1	spp42	-	cwf6	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932785	2539730	2539035	276282	275608	SPBC1861.08c	SPCC794.09c	lea1	tef101	-	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932786	2539730	2540884	276282	277401	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC19C2.14	lea1	smd3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932787	2539730	2538901	276282	275479	SPBC1861.08c	SPCP1E11.07c	lea1	cwf18	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932788	2539730	2540547	276282	277074	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC32F12.11	lea1	tdh1	-	gpd1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932789	2539730	2540753	276282	277274	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC211.02c	lea1	cwf3	-	syf1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932790	2539730	2541124	276282	277639	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC646.02	lea1	cwf11	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932791	2539730	2538974	276282	275548	SPBC1861.08c	SPCC550.02c	lea1	cwf5	-	ecm2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932792	2539730	2539984	276282	276528	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC1289.11	lea1	spf38	-	cwf17	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932793	2539730	2543189	276282	279618	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC30D11.09	lea1	cwf19	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932794	2539730	2543019	276282	279455	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC57A10.03	lea1	cyp1	-	cyp2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932795	2539730	2540330	276282	276860	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC3E7.14	lea1	smf1	-	SPBC4F6.01	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932796	2539730	2540585	276282	277111	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC28F2.04c	lea1	cwf7	-	spf27	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932797	2539730	2542690	276282	279143	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC27D7.07c	lea1	smd1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932798	2539730	2538988	276282	275562	SPBC1861.08c	SPCC188.11	lea1	prp45	-	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932799	2539730	2540230	276282	276762	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC32F12.05c	lea1	cwf12	-	isy1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932800	2539730	2540434	276282	276962	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC24C6.11	lea1	cwf14	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932801	2539730	2539730	276282	276282	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC1861.08c	lea1	lea1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932802	2539730	2540611	276282	277137	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC3E7.13c	lea1	syf2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932803	2539730	2542684	276282	279137	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC26A3.08	lea1	smb1	-	smb	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932804	2539730	2540855	276282	277372	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC4B4.05	lea1	smg1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932805	2539730	2543676	276282	280090	SPBC1861.08c	SPAC9.03c	lea1	brr2	-	spp41	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932806	2540711	2542256	277234	278726	SPBC215.12	SPAC29A4.08c	cwf10	prp19	snu114|spef2	cwf8	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932807	2540711	2542531	277234	278989	SPBC215.12	SPAC3A12.11c	cwf10	cwf2	snu114|spef2	prp3|cwc2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932808	2540711	2542480	277234	278940	SPBC215.12	SPAC2C4.03c	cwf10	smd2	snu114|spef2	cwf9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932809	2540711	2540328	277234	276858	SPBC215.12	SPBC31F10.11c	cwf10	cwf4	snu114|spef2	syf3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932810	2540711	3361260	277234	280336	SPBC215.12	SPBP22H7.07	cwf10	prp5	snu114|spef2	cwf1|pi024|SPACTOKYO_453.10	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932811	2540711	2543583	277234	279998	SPBC215.12	SPAC644.12	cwf10	cdc5	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932812	2540711	2540983	277234	277499	SPBC215.12	SPBC337.06c	cwf10	cwf15	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932813	2540711	2541168	277234	277683	SPBC215.12	SPBC6B1.10	cwf10	prp17	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932814	2540711	2543413	277234	279835	SPBC215.12	SPAC4F8.12c	cwf10	spp42	snu114|spef2	cwf6	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932815	2540711	2539035	277234	275608	SPBC215.12	SPCC794.09c	cwf10	tef101	snu114|spef2	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932816	2540711	2540884	277234	277401	SPBC215.12	SPBC19C2.14	cwf10	smd3	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932817	2540711	2538901	277234	275479	SPBC215.12	SPCP1E11.07c	cwf10	cwf18	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932818	2540711	2540547	277234	277074	SPBC215.12	SPBC32F12.11	cwf10	tdh1	snu114|spef2	gpd1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932819	2540711	2540753	277234	277274	SPBC215.12	SPBC211.02c	cwf10	cwf3	snu114|spef2	syf1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932820	2540711	2541124	277234	277639	SPBC215.12	SPBC646.02	cwf10	cwf11	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932821	2540711	2538974	277234	275548	SPBC215.12	SPCC550.02c	cwf10	cwf5	snu114|spef2	ecm2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932822	2540711	2539984	277234	276528	SPBC215.12	SPBC1289.11	cwf10	spf38	snu114|spef2	cwf17	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932823	2540711	2543189	277234	279618	SPBC215.12	SPAC30D11.09	cwf10	cwf19	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932824	2540711	2543019	277234	279455	SPBC215.12	SPAC57A10.03	cwf10	cyp1	snu114|spef2	cyp2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932825	2540711	2540330	277234	276860	SPBC215.12	SPBC3E7.14	cwf10	smf1	snu114|spef2	SPBC4F6.01	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932826	2540711	2540585	277234	277111	SPBC215.12	SPBC28F2.04c	cwf10	cwf7	snu114|spef2	spf27	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932827	2540711	2542690	277234	279143	SPBC215.12	SPAC27D7.07c	cwf10	smd1	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932828	2540711	2538988	277234	275562	SPBC215.12	SPCC188.11	cwf10	prp45	snu114|spef2	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932829	2540711	2540230	277234	276762	SPBC215.12	SPBC32F12.05c	cwf10	cwf12	snu114|spef2	isy1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932830	2540711	2540434	277234	276962	SPBC215.12	SPBC24C6.11	cwf10	cwf14	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932831	2540711	2539730	277234	276282	SPBC215.12	SPBC1861.08c	cwf10	lea1	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932832	2540711	2540611	277234	277137	SPBC215.12	SPBC3E7.13c	cwf10	syf2	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932833	2540711	2542684	277234	279137	SPBC215.12	SPAC26A3.08	cwf10	smb1	snu114|spef2	smb	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932834	2540711	2540855	277234	277372	SPBC215.12	SPBC4B4.05	cwf10	smg1	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932835	2540711	2543676	277234	280090	SPBC215.12	SPAC9.03c	cwf10	brr2	snu114|spef2	spp41	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen W (2014)	24442611	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932865	2541720	2542492	278214	278951	SPAC23H3.13c	SPAC1B9.02c	gpa2	sck1	git8	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Mudge DK (2014)	24297439	284812	284812	High Throughput|Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932866	2541720	2540810	278214	277329	SPAC23H3.13c	SPBC19C7.03	gpa2	cyr1	git8	git2	Two-hybrid	physical	Mudge DK (2014)	24297439	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932867	2538770	2541720	275353	278214	SPCC1753.02c	SPAC23H3.13c	git3	gpa2	-	git8	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mudge DK (2014)	24297439	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|protein/peptide accumulation	-	-	BIOGRID
932871	2541720	2542492	278214	278951	SPAC23H3.13c	SPAC1B9.02c	gpa2	sck1	git8	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Mudge DK (2014)	24297439	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|protein/peptide accumulation	Deletion of sck1  enhances the ability of a gpa2 mutation to restore function in a git3 deletion background	-	BIOGRID
932872	2541720	2542492	278214	278951	SPAC23H3.13c	SPAC1B9.02c	gpa2	sck1	git8	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mudge DK (2014)	24297439	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|protein/peptide accumulation	Overexpression of sck1 decreases the ability of a gpa2 mutation to restore function in a git3 deletion background	-	BIOGRID
932887	2542084	2541028	278561	277543	SPAC7D4.07c	SPBC577.08c	trx1	txl1	-	trx3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Calvo IA (2013)	24316080	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	-	-	BIOGRID
932888	2542084	2542140	278561	278616	SPAC7D4.07c	SPAC1783.07c	trx1	pap1	-	caf3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Calvo IA (2013)	24316080	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	-	-	BIOGRID
932889	2542084	2542084	278561	278561	SPAC7D4.07c	SPAC7D4.07c	trx1	trx1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Calvo IA (2013)	24316080	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932890	2542140	2542140	278616	278616	SPAC1783.07c	SPAC1783.07c	pap1	pap1	caf3	caf3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Calvo IA (2013)	24316080	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
932891	2539572	2540222	276132	276755	SPCC576.03c	SPBC32F12.03c	tpx1	gpx1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Calvo IA (2013)	24316080	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	-	-	BIOGRID
932892	2540222	2542084	276755	278561	SPBC32F12.03c	SPAC7D4.07c	gpx1	trx1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Calvo IA (2013)	24316080	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	mutation of trx1 blocks the ability of a gpx1 mutant to suppress the protein oxidation defect in tpx1 cells	-	BIOGRID
932899	2543630	2540825	280044	277343	SPAC1F3.01	SPBC428.08c	rrp6	clr4	SPAC3H8.11	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Shah S (2014)	24493644	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	-	-	BIOGRID
932920	2542972	2541869	279411	278359	SPAPYUG7.02c	SPAC22F3.13	sin1	tsc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Laor D (2013)	24344203	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	utilization of nitrogen source	proline	-	BIOGRID
932921	2542972	2543339	279411	279762	SPAPYUG7.02c	SPAC630.13c	sin1	tsc2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Laor D (2013)	24344203	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	utilization of nitrogen source	proline	-	BIOGRID
932922	2539206	2541869	275776	278359	SPCC24B10.07	SPAC22F3.13	gad8	tsc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Laor D (2013)	24344203	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	utilization of nitrogen source	proline	-	BIOGRID
932923	2539206	2543339	275776	279762	SPCC24B10.07	SPAC630.13c	gad8	tsc2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Laor D (2013)	24344203	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	utilization of nitrogen source	proline	-	BIOGRID
932924	2543339	2542728	279762	279178	SPAC630.13c	SPAC25B8.13c	tsc2	isp7	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Laor D (2013)	24344203	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	utilization of nitrogen source	proline	-	BIOGRID
932925	2543339	2540954	279762	277470	SPAC630.13c	SPBC337.13c	tsc2	gtr1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Laor D (2013)	24344203	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	utilization of nitrogen source	proline	-	BIOGRID
932926	2543339	2539088	279762	275660	SPAC630.13c	SPCC777.05	tsc2	gtr2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Laor D (2013)	24344203	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	utilization of nitrogen source	proline	-	BIOGRID
932927	2541869	2542728	278359	279178	SPAC22F3.13	SPAC25B8.13c	tsc1	isp7	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Laor D (2013)	24344203	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	utilization of nitrogen source	proline	-	BIOGRID
932928	2543339	2542728	279762	279178	SPAC630.13c	SPAC25B8.13c	tsc2	isp7	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Laor D (2013)	24344203	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	rapamycin	-	BIOGRID
932929	2541869	2542728	278359	279178	SPAC22F3.13	SPAC25B8.13c	tsc1	isp7	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Laor D (2013)	24344203	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	rapamycin	-	BIOGRID
932930	2543339	2540720	279762	277243	SPAC630.13c	SPBC216.07c	tsc2	tor2	-	SPBC646.01c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Laor D (2013)	24344203	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	rapamycin	-	BIOGRID
932931	2543339	2542728	279762	279178	SPAC630.13c	SPAC25B8.13c	tsc2	isp7	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Laor D (2013)	24344203	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient uptake|resistance to chemicals	arginine|canavanine|thialysine	-	BIOGRID
932932	2543339	2542728	279762	279178	SPAC630.13c	SPAC25B8.13c	tsc2	isp7	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Laor D (2013)	24344203	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	utilization of nitrogen source|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
932933	2543339	2542728	279762	279178	SPAC630.13c	SPAC25B8.13c	tsc2	isp7	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Laor D (2013)	24344203	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient uptake:wild type|protein/peptide modification|protein/peptide modification:wild type|resistance to chemicals:undetermined|resistance to chemicals:wild type	Rps6p phosphorylation|arginine|canavanine	-	BIOGRID
932934	2542728	2540720	279178	277243	SPAC25B8.13c	SPBC216.07c	isp7	tor2	-	SPBC646.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Laor D (2013)	24344203	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient uptake:wild type	proline	-	BIOGRID
932935	2542728	2540720	279178	277243	SPAC25B8.13c	SPBC216.07c	isp7	tor2	-	SPBC646.01c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Laor D (2013)	24344203	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient uptake	arginine	-	BIOGRID
932938	2540954	2542728	277470	279178	SPBC337.13c	SPAC25B8.13c	gtr1	isp7	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Laor D (2013)	24344203	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification:wild type	Rps6p phosphorylation	-	BIOGRID
932939	2542728	2540954	279178	277470	SPAC25B8.13c	SPBC337.13c	isp7	gtr1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Laor D (2013)	24344203	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	canavanine	-	BIOGRID
932940	2542728	2539088	279178	275660	SPAC25B8.13c	SPCC777.05	isp7	gtr2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Laor D (2013)	24344203	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type	canavanine	-	BIOGRID
932941	2541869	2540853	278359	277370	SPAC22F3.13	SPBC428.16c	tsc1	rhb1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Laor D (2013)	24344203	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	canavanine	-	BIOGRID
932942	2540954	2543339	277470	279762	SPBC337.13c	SPAC630.13c	gtr1	tsc2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Laor D (2013)	24344203	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	canavanine	-	BIOGRID
932943	2540473	2543339	277001	279762	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC630.13c	tor1	tsc2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Laor D (2013)	24344203	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	canavanine|thialysine	-	BIOGRID
932944	2540954	2543339	277470	279762	SPBC337.13c	SPAC630.13c	gtr1	tsc2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Laor D (2013)	24344203	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
932945	2539088	2543339	275660	279762	SPCC777.05	SPAC630.13c	gtr2	tsc2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Laor D (2013)	24344203	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
932946	2543339	2542728	279762	279178	SPAC630.13c	SPAC25B8.13c	tsc2	isp7	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Laor D (2013)	24344203	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	rapamycin	-	BIOGRID
932947	2539206	2539703	275776	276256	SPCC24B10.07	SPBC16G5.15c	gad8	fkh2	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Laor D (2013)	24344203	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
933131	2542727	2540679	279177	277204	SPAC26A3.02	SPBC3D6.10	myh1	apn2	myh	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Jin J (2014)	24559510	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
933132	2540679	2542727	277204	279177	SPBC3D6.10	SPAC26A3.02	apn2	myh1	-	myh	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Jin J (2014)	24559510	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
933134	2541889	2541590	278379	278087	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC57A10.02	pom1	cdr2	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Bhatia P (2013)	24316795	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
935408	10987	2542393	116183	278857	-	SPAC17G6.12	COPS5	cul1	CSN5|JAB1|MOV-34|SGN5	pcu1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Fuezesi-Levi MG (2014)	24421388	9606	284812	Low Throughput	-	No Modification	-	Deneddylation	-	BIOGRID
937195	2539087	2542140	275659	278616	SPCC1259.13	SPAC1783.07c	chk1	pap1	rad27	caf3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Belfield C (2014)	24587136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals[camptothecin]	chk1-D469G allele or chk1 null mutation; pap1 overexpression confers increased resistance to camptothecin (CHEBI: 27656)	-	BIOGRID
937245	2542558	2542140	279014	278616	SPAC1952.07	SPAC1783.07c	rad1	pap1	rad19	caf3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Belfield C (2014)	24587136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals[camptothecin]	pap1 overexpression confers increased resistance to camptothecin (CHEBI: 27656)	-	BIOGRID
937246	2543544	2542140	279961	278616	SPAC664.07c	SPAC1783.07c	rad9	pap1	-	caf3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Belfield C (2014)	24587136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals[camptothecin]	pap1 overexpression confers increased resistance to camptothecin (CHEBI: 27656)	-	BIOGRID
937253	2541849	2542140	278340	278616	SPAC20G8.01	SPAC1783.07c	cdc17	pap1	SPAC57A10.13c	caf3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Belfield C (2014)	24587136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	pap1 overexpression rescues growth of a cdc17-k42 chk1 double mutant at 32 deg C	-	BIOGRID
937254	2539087	2542140	275659	278616	SPCC1259.13	SPAC1783.07c	chk1	pap1	rad27	caf3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Belfield C (2014)	24587136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	pap1 overexpression rescues growth of a cdc17-k42 chk1 double mutant at 32 deg C|pap1 overexpression rescues growth of a cdc6-23 chk1 double mutant at 29 deg C	-	BIOGRID
937255	2540255	2542140	276786	278616	SPBC336.04	SPAC1783.07c	cdc6	pap1	mis10|pol3|pold	caf3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Belfield C (2014)	24587136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	pap1 overexpression rescues growth of a cdc6-23 chk1 double mutant at 29 deg C	-	BIOGRID
937258	2539087	2541849	275659	278340	SPCC1259.13	SPAC20G8.01	chk1	cdc17	rad27	SPAC57A10.13c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Belfield C (2014)	24587136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	cdc17-k42 and chk1-D469G alleles; 32 deg C	-	BIOGRID
937259	2539087	2540255	275659	276786	SPCC1259.13	SPBC336.04	chk1	cdc6	rad27	mis10|pol3|pold	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Belfield C (2014)	24587136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	cdc6-23 and chk1-D469G alleles; 30 deg C	-	BIOGRID
939302	2542537	2542404	278994	278868	SPAC19D5.04	SPAC57A7.11	ptr1	mip1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Iida N (2014)	24766403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	ptr1-1 allele; suppression of the temperature-sensitive growth of ptr1-1	-	BIOGRID
939303	2542537	2542404	278994	278868	SPAC19D5.04	SPAC57A7.11	ptr1	mip1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Iida N (2014)	24766403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in S phase	ptr1-1 allele; suppression of the cell-cycle checkpoint defect of ptr1-1	-	BIOGRID
939304	2539403	2542404	275968	278868	SPCC736.11	SPAC57A7.11	ago1	mip1	csp9	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Iida N (2014)	24766403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in S phase	ago1-3A allele; suppression of the cell-cycle checkpoint defect of ago1-3A	-	BIOGRID
939305	2543139	2541652	279571	278148	SPAC12G12.03	SPAC24B11.06c	cip2	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Duncan CD (2014)	24755092	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
939306	2541652	2543139	278148	279571	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC12G12.03	sty1	cip2	phh1|spc1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Duncan CD (2014)	24755092	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
939307	2542204	2540778	278679	277297	SPAC17A5.14	SPBC19G7.10c	exo2	SPBC19G7.10c	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Duncan CD (2014)	24755092	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
939308	2542204	2542958	278679	279398	SPAC17A5.14	SPAC12G12.09	exo2	SPAC12G12.09	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Duncan CD (2014)	24755092	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
939309	2542204	2542958	278679	279398	SPAC17A5.14	SPAC12G12.09	exo2	SPAC12G12.09	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Duncan CD (2014)	24755092	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
939310	2542958	2542204	279398	278679	SPAC12G12.09	SPAC17A5.14	SPAC12G12.09	exo2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Duncan CD (2014)	24755092	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
939318	2543086	2539004	279519	275578	SPAC30D11.10	SPCC4G3.05c	rad52	mus81	rad22|rad22A	slx3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bellini A (2014)	24748152	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic recombination	rad52-S365G-YFP allele	-	BIOGRID
939319	2539004	2541652	275578	278148	SPCC4G3.05c	SPAC24B11.06c	mus81	sty1	slx3	phh1|spc1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bellini A (2014)	24748152	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	loss of Rad52 phosphorylation	-	BIOGRID
939330	2543281	2538959	279708	275533	SPAC23C4.18c	SPCC18B5.11c	rad4	cds1	cut5|dpb11|dre3	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yue M (2014)	24663817	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	rad4-C13Y or rad4-K56R alleles; increased sensitivity to HU (CHEBI:44423) or MMS (CHEBI:25255)	-	BIOGRID
939331	2543281	2540992	279708	277508	SPAC23C4.18c	SPBC342.05	rad4	crb2	cut5|dpb11|dre3	rhp9	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Yue M (2014)	24663817	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
939332	2543281	2543544	279708	279961	SPAC23C4.18c	SPAC664.07c	rad4	rad9	cut5|dpb11|dre3	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Yue M (2014)	24663817	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
939333	2543544	2543281	279961	279708	SPAC664.07c	SPAC23C4.18c	rad9	rad4	-	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yue M (2014)	24663817	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
939334	2540992	2543281	277508	279708	SPBC342.05	SPAC23C4.18c	crb2	rad4	rhp9	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yue M (2014)	24663817	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
939335	2540992	2543544	277508	279961	SPBC342.05	SPAC664.07c	crb2	rad9	rhp9	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yue M (2014)	24663817	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
939355	2540719	2543289	277242	279714	SPBC216.05	SPAC9E9.08	rad3	rad26	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Yue M (2014)	24663817	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
939356	2540719	2538959	277242	275533	SPBC216.05	SPCC18B5.11c	rad3	cds1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Yue M (2014)	24663817	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	Rad3 protein in complex with Rad26 protein	-	BIOGRID
939400	2540380	2540380	276909	276909	SPBC1A4.05	SPBC1A4.05	blt1	blt1	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Goss JW (2014)	24790095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	forms homo-tetramers	-	BIOGRID
939401	2540380	2540845	276909	277362	SPBC1A4.05	SPBC428.13c	blt1	mob1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Goss JW (2014)	24790095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	mob1-R4 allele; decreased viability at 25 and 30 deg C	-	BIOGRID
939402	2540380	2541599	276909	278096	SPBC1A4.05	SPAC24B11.11c	blt1	sid2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Goss JW (2014)	24790095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	sid2-250 allele; decreased viability at 25 and 30 deg C	-	BIOGRID
939407	2540380	2541975	276909	278460	SPBC1A4.05	SPAC20G8.05c	blt1	cdc15	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Goss JW (2014)	24790095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
939408	2540380	2540845	276909	277362	SPBC1A4.05	SPBC428.13c	blt1	mob1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Goss JW (2014)	24790095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
939409	2540380	2541599	276909	278096	SPBC1A4.05	SPAC24B11.11c	blt1	sid2	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Goss JW (2014)	24790095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
939410	2540380	2539149	276909	275721	SPBC1A4.05	SPCC1739.11c	blt1	cdc11	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Goss JW (2014)	24790095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	cdc11-19 allele; decreased viability at 36 deg C	-	BIOGRID
939411	2540380	2540624	276909	277150	SPBC1A4.05	SPBC24C6.07	blt1	cdc14	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Goss JW (2014)	24790095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	cdc14-118 allele; decreased viability at 25 and 30 deg C	-	BIOGRID
939412	2540380	2541975	276909	278460	SPBC1A4.05	SPAC20G8.05c	blt1	cdc15	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Goss JW (2014)	24790095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	cdc15-127 allele; decreased viability at 36 deg C	-	BIOGRID
939413	2540380	2542162	276909	278638	SPBC1A4.05	SPAC6F6.08c	blt1	cdc16	-	bub2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Goss JW (2014)	24790095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	cdc16-116 allele; decreased viability at 25 and 30 deg C	-	BIOGRID
939414	2540380	2539869	276909	276415	SPBC1A4.05	SPBC11B10.09	blt1	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Goss JW (2014)	24790095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	cdc2-M26 allele; decreased viability at 25 and 30 deg C	-	BIOGRID
939415	2540380	2542632	276909	279086	SPBC1A4.05	SPAC24H6.05	blt1	cdc25	-	sal2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Goss JW (2014)	24790095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	cdc25-22 allele; decreased viability at 30 deg C	-	BIOGRID
939416	2540380	2543526	276909	279944	SPBC1A4.05	SPAC4A8.15c	blt1	cdc3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Goss JW (2014)	24790095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	cdc3-6 allele; decreased viability at 25 and 30 deg C	-	BIOGRID
939417	2540380	2541699	276909	278195	SPBC1A4.05	SPAP8A3.08	blt1	cdc4	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Goss JW (2014)	24790095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	cdc4-8 allele; decreased viability at 30 and 36 deg C	-	BIOGRID
939418	2540380	2540660	276909	277185	SPBC1A4.05	SPBC21.06c	blt1	cdc7	-	its10|pld1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Goss JW (2014)	24790095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	cdc7-24 allele; decreased viability at 30 deg C	-	BIOGRID
939419	2540380	2541940	276909	278427	SPBC1A4.05	SPAC27F1.02c	blt1	cdc8	-	fus4	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Goss JW (2014)	24790095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	cdc8-27 allele; decreased viability at 30 deg C	-	BIOGRID
939420	2540380	2539205	276909	275775	SPBC1A4.05	SPCC4B3.15	blt1	mid1	-	dmf1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Goss JW (2014)	24790095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	decreased viability at 25 and 30 deg C	-	BIOGRID
939421	2540380	2540737	276909	277260	SPBC1A4.05	SPBC19G7.05c	blt1	bgs1	-	cps1|drc1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Goss JW (2014)	24790095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	decreased viability at 25 and 30 deg C	-	BIOGRID
939422	2540380	2539513	276909	276075	SPBC1A4.05	SPCC645.05c	blt1	myo2	-	rng5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Goss JW (2014)	24790095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	myo2-E1 allele; decreased viability at 30 deg C	-	BIOGRID
939423	2540380	2541957	276909	278444	SPBC1A4.05	SPAC23C11.16	blt1	plo1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Goss JW (2014)	24790095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	plo1-24C allele; decreased viability at 30 deg C	-	BIOGRID
939424	2540380	2543129	276909	279561	SPBC1A4.05	SPAC4F8.13c	blt1	rng2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Goss JW (2014)	24790095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	rng2-D5 allele; decreased viability at 30 deg C	-	BIOGRID
939425	2540380	2542746	276909	279196	SPBC1A4.05	SPAC9G1.09	blt1	sid1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Goss JW (2014)	24790095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	sid1-125 allele; decreased viability at 30 deg C	-	BIOGRID
939426	2540380	2540650	276909	277175	SPBC1A4.05	SPBC244.01c	blt1	sid4	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Goss JW (2014)	24790095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	sid4-A1 allele; decreased viability at 25 deg C	-	BIOGRID
939427	2540380	2542761	276909	279211	SPBC1A4.05	SPAC1565.06c	blt1	spg1	-	sid3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Goss JW (2014)	24790095	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	spg1-106 allele; decreased viability at 25 and 30 deg C	-	BIOGRID
939440	2539179	2542144	275750	278620	SPCC31H12.05c	SPAC6F6.17	sds21	rif1	-	SPAPJ736.01|tap1|tap11	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dave A (2014)	24656819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
939441	2541193	2542144	277707	278620	SPBC776.02c	SPAC6F6.17	dis2	rif1	bws1|sds1	SPAPJ736.01|tap1|tap11	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dave A (2014)	24656819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
939444	2541165	2542144	277680	278620	SPBC776.12c	SPAC6F6.17	hsk1	rif1	cdc7	SPAPJ736.01|tap1|tap11	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Dave A (2014)	24656819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	hsk1-89 allele; rif1 null mutation, or rif1 mutated in a PP1-interacting motif, partially restores growth at 30 deg C	-	BIOGRID
939445	2543254	2542173	279682	278648	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC17H9.02	red1	mtl1	iss3	SPAC17H9.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	333.9805825	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
939446	2543254	2540291	279682	276822	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC337.12	red1	red5	iss3	SPBC337.12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	26.52519894	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
939447	2543254	2541143	279682	277658	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC725.08	red1	pir2	iss3	SPBC725.08|ars2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	70.60755337	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
939448	2543254	2541655	279682	278151	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC7D4.14c	red1	iss10	iss3	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	168.784029	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
939449	2543254	2541281	279682	277794	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC902.04	red1	rmn1	iss3	SPBC902.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	20.37351443	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
939505	2542029	2539828	278511	276377	SPAC8E11.02c	SPBC15D4.02	rad24	gsf1	anr5|sam4	SPBC15D4.02|rfl1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Matsuzawa T (2013)	23311928	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	data not shown|overexpression of gsf1 rescues Ca sensitivity in a rad24 mutant	-	BIOGRID
940824	7316	2542606	113164	279060	-	SPAC19B12.10	UBC	sst2	HMG20	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Shrestha RK (2014)	24787148	9606	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
940825	7316	2542606	113164	279060	-	SPAC19B12.10	UBC	sst2	HMG20	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Shrestha RK (2014)	24787148	9606	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
940986	2542438	3361474	278900	280550	SPAC17C9.01c	SPATRNAALA.03	nuc2	SPATRNAALA.03	SPAC1851.01|apc3	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Samejima I (1994)	7798319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
940987	2541592	3361474	278089	280550	SPAC6F12.15c	SPATRNAALA.03	cut9	SPATRNAALA.03	dre1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Samejima I (1994)	7798319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
940988	2541592	3361474	278089	280550	SPAC6F12.15c	SPATRNAALA.03	cut9	SPATRNAALA.03	dre1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kimata Y (2004)	15126629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
940989	3361474	2543348	280550	279770	SPATRNAALA.03	SPAC688.13	SPATRNAALA.03	scn3	-	scn1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kimata Y (2004)	15126629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
940990	3361474	3361450	280550	280526	SPATRNAALA.03	SPATRNAALA.02	SPATRNAALA.03	SPATRNAALA.02	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kimata Y (2004)	15126629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
940991	2541592	3361450	278089	280526	SPAC6F12.15c	SPATRNAALA.02	cut9	SPATRNAALA.02	dre1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kimata Y (2004)	15126629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
940992	3361450	2543348	280526	279770	SPATRNAALA.02	SPAC688.13	SPATRNAALA.02	scn3	-	scn1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kimata Y (2004)	15126629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
940993	3361474	3361257	280550	280333	SPATRNAALA.03	SPBTRNATHR.06	SPATRNAALA.03	SPBTRNATHR.06	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kimata Y (2004)	15126629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
940994	3361450	3361257	280526	280333	SPATRNAALA.02	SPBTRNATHR.06	SPATRNAALA.02	SPBTRNATHR.06	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kimata Y (2004)	15126629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
940995	3361474	3361099	280550	280175	SPATRNAALA.03	SPCTRNATHR.10	SPATRNAALA.03	SPCTRNATHR.10	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kimata Y (2004)	15126629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
940996	3361450	3361099	280526	280175	SPATRNAALA.02	SPCTRNATHR.10	SPATRNAALA.02	SPCTRNATHR.10	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kimata Y (2004)	15126629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
940997	2542438	3361450	278900	280526	SPAC17C9.01c	SPATRNAALA.02	nuc2	SPATRNAALA.02	SPAC1851.01|apc3	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Samejima I (1994)	7798319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
940998	2541592	3361450	278089	280526	SPAC6F12.15c	SPATRNAALA.02	cut9	SPATRNAALA.02	dre1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Samejima I (1994)	7798319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
942206	2542173	2543254	278648	279682	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC1006.03c	mtl1	red1	SPAC17H9.02	iss3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942207	2541655	2543254	278151	279682	SPAC7D4.14c	SPAC1006.03c	iss10	red1	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	iss3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942208	2540291	2543254	276822	279682	SPBC337.12	SPAC1006.03c	red5	red1	SPBC337.12	iss3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942209	2541143	2543254	277658	279682	SPBC725.08	SPAC1006.03c	pir2	red1	SPBC725.08|ars2	iss3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942210	2541281	2543254	277794	279682	SPBC902.04	SPAC1006.03c	rmn1	red1	SPBC902.04	iss3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942211	2543630	2543254	280044	279682	SPAC1F3.01	SPAC1006.03c	rrp6	red1	SPAC3H8.11	iss3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942212	2543630	2542173	280044	278648	SPAC1F3.01	SPAC17H9.02	rrp6	mtl1	SPAC3H8.11	SPAC17H9.02	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942213	2543254	2542636	279682	279090	SPAC1006.03c	SPAP27G11.13c	red1	nop10	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	78.125	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
942214	2543254	2540330	279682	276860	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC3E7.14	red1	smf1	iss3	SPBC4F6.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	76.92307692	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
942215	2543254	2539105	279682	275677	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC1739.07	red1	cti1	iss3	lrp1|rrp47	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	75.18796992	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
942333	2538763	2540369	275346	276898	SPCC970.12	SPBC27B12.02	mis18	mis19	-	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Subramanian L (2014)	24789708	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942334	2538763	2541134	275346	277649	SPCC970.12	SPBC776.16	mis18	mis20	-	SPBC776.16|eic2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Subramanian L (2014)	24789708	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942335	2539214	2540369	275784	276898	SPCC1672.10	SPBC27B12.02	mis16	mis19	-	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Subramanian L (2014)	24789708	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942336	2539214	2538763	275784	275346	SPCC1672.10	SPCC970.12	mis16	mis18	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Subramanian L (2014)	24789708	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942337	2539214	2542502	275784	278960	SPCC1672.10	SPAC139.06	mis16	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Subramanian L (2014)	24789708	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942338	2540369	2539214	276898	275784	SPBC27B12.02	SPCC1672.10	mis19	mis16	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Subramanian L (2014)	24789708	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942339	2540369	2538763	276898	275346	SPBC27B12.02	SPCC970.12	mis19	mis18	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Subramanian L (2014)	24789708	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942340	2541134	2538763	277649	275346	SPBC776.16	SPCC970.12	mis20	mis18	SPBC776.16|eic2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Subramanian L (2014)	24789708	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942341	2538763	2540369	275346	276898	SPCC970.12	SPBC27B12.02	mis18	mis19	-	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Subramanian L (2014)	24789708	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942342	2539214	2540369	275784	276898	SPCC1672.10	SPBC27B12.02	mis16	mis19	-	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Subramanian L (2014)	24789708	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942343	2538763	2539214	275346	275784	SPCC970.12	SPCC1672.10	mis18	mis16	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Subramanian L (2014)	24789708	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942346	2539214	2542502	275784	278960	SPCC1672.10	SPAC139.06	mis16	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Subramanian L (2014)	24789708	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942347	2542502	2539214	278960	275784	SPAC139.06	SPCC1672.10	hat1	mis16	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Subramanian L (2014)	24789708	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942352	2540369	2538763	276898	275346	SPBC27B12.02	SPCC970.12	mis19	mis18	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Subramanian L (2014)	24789708	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	mis18-262 and eic1-1 ts alleles	-	BIOGRID
942353	2541134	2538763	277649	275346	SPBC776.16	SPCC970.12	mis20	mis18	SPBC776.16|eic2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Subramanian L (2014)	24789708	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	mis18-262 allele	-	BIOGRID
942354	2540369	2539214	276898	275784	SPBC27B12.02	SPCC1672.10	mis19	mis16	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Subramanian L (2014)	24789708	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	eic1-1 ts and mis16-53 alleles	-	BIOGRID
942355	2540369	2543449	276898	279869	SPBC27B12.02	SPAPB1A10.02	mis19	scm3	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Subramanian L (2014)	24789708	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	eic1-1 ts and scm3-139 alleles	-	BIOGRID
942356	2543449	2541134	279869	277649	SPAPB1A10.02	SPBC776.16	scm3	mis20	-	SPBC776.16|eic2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Subramanian L (2014)	24789708	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	eic1-1 ts and scm3-139 alleles; viability restored at 32 deg C	-	BIOGRID
942357	2540369	2543449	276898	279869	SPBC27B12.02	SPAPB1A10.02	mis19	scm3	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Subramanian L (2014)	24789708	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	eic1-1 and scm3-15 alleles	-	BIOGRID
942358	2540369	2539658	276898	276213	SPBC27B12.02	SPBC1105.17	mis19	cnp1	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	sim2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Subramanian L (2014)	24789708	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	eic1-1 and cnp1-76 alleles	-	BIOGRID
942359	2540369	2542304	276898	278771	SPBC27B12.02	SPAC1687.20c	mis19	mis6	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Subramanian L (2014)	24789708	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	eic1-1 and mis6-302 alleles	-	BIOGRID
942360	2541134	2540369	277649	276898	SPBC776.16	SPBC27B12.02	mis20	mis19	SPBC776.16|eic2	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Subramanian L (2014)	24789708	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942361	2541134	2538763	277649	275346	SPBC776.16	SPCC970.12	mis20	mis18	SPBC776.16|eic2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Subramanian L (2014)	24789708	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942362	2540369	2539115	276898	275687	SPBC27B12.02	SPCC1235.07	mis19	fta7	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	cnl3|sma7	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Subramanian L (2014)	24789708	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942363	2540369	2541788	276898	278280	SPBC27B12.02	SPAC23H4.11c	mis19	cnl2	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Subramanian L (2014)	24789708	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942364	2540369	2542737	276898	279187	SPBC27B12.02	SPAC25B8.14	mis19	mal2	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Subramanian L (2014)	24789708	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942365	2540369	2541134	276898	277649	SPBC27B12.02	SPBC776.16	mis19	mis20	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	SPBC776.16|eic2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Subramanian L (2014)	24789708	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942366	2540369	2539214	276898	275784	SPBC27B12.02	SPCC1672.10	mis19	mis16	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Subramanian L (2014)	24789708	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942367	2540369	2538763	276898	275346	SPBC27B12.02	SPCC970.12	mis19	mis18	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Subramanian L (2014)	24789708	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942368	2540369	2539115	276898	275687	SPBC27B12.02	SPCC1235.07	mis19	fta7	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	cnl3|sma7	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Subramanian L (2014)	24789708	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942369	2540369	2541788	276898	278280	SPBC27B12.02	SPAC23H4.11c	mis19	cnl2	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Subramanian L (2014)	24789708	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942370	2540369	2542737	276898	279187	SPBC27B12.02	SPAC25B8.14	mis19	mal2	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Subramanian L (2014)	24789708	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	mal2-1 and eic1-1 alleles	-	BIOGRID
942371	2539736	2539466	276288	276029	SPBC12C2.12c	SPCC757.03c	glo1	hsp3101	SPBC21D10.03c	SPCC757.03c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Zhao Q (2014)	24758716	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	increased resistance to methylglyoxal (CHEBI:17158)	-	BIOGRID
942372	2539736	2541799	276288	278290	SPBC12C2.12c	SPAC5H10.02c	glo1	hsp3102	SPBC21D10.03c	SPAC5H10.02c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Zhao Q (2014)	24758716	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	increased resistance to methylglyoxal (CHEBI:17158)	-	BIOGRID
942412	2542773	2543214	279222	279643	SPAC16.01	SPAC6F12.06	rho2	SPAC6F12.06	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sanchez-Mir L (2014)	24820419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Pmk1 phosphorylation restored	-	BIOGRID
942413	2542773	3361511	279222	280587	SPAC16.01	SPAC23C4.08	rho2	rho3	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sanchez-Mir L (2014)	24820419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Pmk1 activity restored	-	BIOGRID
942414	2542773	2541058	279222	277573	SPAC16.01	SPBC3H7.09	rho2	erf2	-	mug142	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sanchez-Mir L (2014)	24820419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Pmk1 activity restored	-	BIOGRID
942437	2540927	2542414	277443	278878	SPBC365.06	SPAC6F6.16c	pmt3	tpz1	smt3|ubl2	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Miyagawa K (2014)	24711392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942439	2542414	2542244	278878	278714	SPAC6F6.16c	SPAC19G12.13c	tpz1	poz1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Miyagawa K (2014)	24711392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942441	2542244	2542414	278714	278878	SPAC19G12.13c	SPAC6F6.16c	poz1	tpz1	-	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Miyagawa K (2014)	24711392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942442	2542414	2542703	278878	279156	SPAC6F6.16c	SPAC26H5.06	tpz1	pot1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Miyagawa K (2014)	24711392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942443	2542244	2539352	278714	275918	SPAC19G12.13c	SPCC188.07	poz1	ccq1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Miyagawa K (2014)	24711392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942444	2542414	2539352	278878	275918	SPAC6F6.16c	SPCC188.07	tpz1	ccq1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Miyagawa K (2014)	24711392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942445	2541052	2542414	277567	278878	SPBC409.12c	SPAC6F6.16c	stn1	tpz1	-	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	Two-hybrid	physical	Miyagawa K (2014)	24711392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	three-hybrid assay in which cells also express untagged Ten1	-	BIOGRID
942446	2540927	2541052	277443	277567	SPBC365.06	SPBC409.12c	pmt3	stn1	smt3|ubl2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Miyagawa K (2014)	24711392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	three-hybrid assay in which cells also express untagged Ten1	-	BIOGRID
942447	9406964	2539418	1028327	275983	SPCC70.12c	SPCC757.07c	ecl1	ctt1	SPNG2611|SPNCRNA.518	cta1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Shimasaki T (2014)	24696293	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	oxidative stress resistance	overexpression of ctt1 restores resistance to 2.5 mM hydrogen peroxide (CHEBI:16240)	-	BIOGRID
942448	9406964	2542677	1028327	279130	SPCC70.12c	SPAC26F1.10c	ecl1	pyp1	SPNG2611|SPNCRNA.518	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Shimasaki T (2014)	24696293	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	ctt1 expression is increased in an ecl1 pyp1 double null mutant relative to an ecl1 single mutant	-	BIOGRID
942449	2540329	9406964	276859	1028327	SPBC29B5.01	SPCC70.12c	atf1	ecl1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	SPNG2611|SPNCRNA.518	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Shimasaki T (2014)	24696293	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	overexpression of ecl1 increases expression of ctt1	-	BIOGRID
942451	2543546	2541283	279963	277796	SPAC4H3.14c	SPBP8B7.02	rng8	rng9	SPAC4H3.14c	SPBP8B7.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang N (2014)	24798735	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942452	2543546	2542964	279963	279404	SPAC4H3.14c	SPAC12G12.07c	rng8	SPAC12G12.07c	SPAC4H3.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang N (2014)	24798735	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942453	2543546	2543252	279963	279680	SPAC4H3.14c	SPAC4F10.10c	rng8	mnn9	SPAC4H3.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang N (2014)	24798735	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942454	2543546	2542858	279963	279304	SPAC4H3.14c	SPAC13G6.12c	rng8	chs1	SPAC4H3.14c	SPAC24B11.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang N (2014)	24798735	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942455	2543546	2539463	279963	276026	SPAC4H3.14c	SPCC550.11	rng8	SPCC550.11	SPAC4H3.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang N (2014)	24798735	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942456	2543546	5802965	279963	858103	SPAC4H3.14c	SPAC11H11.06	rng8	arp2	SPAC4H3.14c	SPAC22F8.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang N (2014)	24798735	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942457	2543546	2541674	279963	278170	SPAC4H3.14c	SPAC1556.07	rng8	pmm1	SPAC4H3.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang N (2014)	24798735	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942458	2543546	2540046	279963	276584	SPAC4H3.14c	SPBC1773.10c	rng8	nrs1	SPAC4H3.14c	ded81	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang N (2014)	24798735	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942459	2543546	2541852	279963	278343	SPAC4H3.14c	SPAC23H3.09c	rng8	gly1	SPAC4H3.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang N (2014)	24798735	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942460	2543546	2541283	279963	277796	SPAC4H3.14c	SPBP8B7.02	rng8	rng9	SPAC4H3.14c	SPBP8B7.02	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang N (2014)	24798735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942461	2541283	2543546	277796	279963	SPBP8B7.02	SPAC4H3.14c	rng9	rng8	SPBP8B7.02	SPAC4H3.14c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang N (2014)	24798735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942468	2543546	2540560	279963	277087	SPAC4H3.14c	SPBC2D10.14c	rng8	myo51	SPAC4H3.14c	-	Co-localization	physical	Wang N (2014)	24798735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942469	2541283	2540560	277796	277087	SPBP8B7.02	SPBC2D10.14c	rng9	myo51	SPBP8B7.02	-	Co-localization	physical	Wang N (2014)	24798735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942470	2540560	2543546	277087	279963	SPBC2D10.14c	SPAC4H3.14c	myo51	rng8	-	SPAC4H3.14c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang N (2014)	24798735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942471	2540560	2541283	277087	277796	SPBC2D10.14c	SPBP8B7.02	myo51	rng9	-	SPBP8B7.02	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang N (2014)	24798735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942472	2540560	2543576	277087	279991	SPBC2D10.14c	SPAC4A8.05c	myo51	myp2	-	myo3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang N (2014)	24798735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis|vegetative growth	cytokinesis defects	-	BIOGRID
942473	2543546	2543576	279963	279991	SPAC4H3.14c	SPAC4A8.05c	rng8	myp2	SPAC4H3.14c	myo3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang N (2014)	24798735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis|vegetative growth	cytokinesis defects	-	BIOGRID
942474	2541283	2543576	277796	279991	SPBP8B7.02	SPAC4A8.05c	rng9	myp2	SPBP8B7.02	myo3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang N (2014)	24798735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis|vegetative growth	cytokinesis defects	-	BIOGRID
942475	2540560	2540560	277087	277087	SPBC2D10.14c	SPBC2D10.14c	myo51	myo51	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang N (2014)	24798735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942476	2543546	2541283	279963	277796	SPAC4H3.14c	SPBP8B7.02	rng8	rng9	SPAC4H3.14c	SPBP8B7.02	Co-purification	physical	Wang N (2014)	24798735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
942477	2543546	2542805	279963	279253	SPAC4H3.14c	SPAC15A10.08	rng8	ain1	SPAC4H3.14c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang N (2014)	24798735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis|vegetative growth	moderate cytokinesis defects	-	BIOGRID
942478	2543546	2543526	279963	279944	SPAC4H3.14c	SPAC4A8.15c	rng8	cdc3	SPAC4H3.14c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang N (2014)	24798735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis|vegetative growth	cdc3-124 allele; double mutant shows moderate cytokinesis defects	-	BIOGRID
942479	2540560	2542805	277087	279253	SPBC2D10.14c	SPAC15A10.08	myo51	ain1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang N (2014)	24798735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis|vegetative growth	moderate cytokinesis defects	-	BIOGRID
946552	2540734	2540927	277257	277443	SPBC19G7.09	SPBC365.06	ulp1	pmt3	-	smt3|ubl2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Desumoylation	-	figure 1. desumoylaion	-	BIOGRID
946553	2542268	2540927	278737	277443	SPAC17A5.07c	SPBC365.06	ulp2	pmt3	-	smt3|ubl2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Desumoylation	-	figure 1. desumoylaion	-	BIOGRID
946554	2540927	2540734	277443	277257	SPBC365.06	SPBC19G7.09	pmt3	ulp1	smt3|ubl2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 1.	-	BIOGRID
946555	2540734	2542268	277257	278737	SPBC19G7.09	SPAC17A5.07c	ulp1	ulp2	-	-	Co-fractionation	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 2.	-	BIOGRID
946556	2542290	2542268	278758	278737	SPAC17C9.03	SPAC17A5.07c	tif471	ulp2	-	-	Co-fractionation	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 2.	-	BIOGRID
946557	2542268	2542290	278737	278758	SPAC17A5.07c	SPAC17C9.03	ulp2	tif471	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946558	2542268	2540873	278737	277390	SPAC17A5.07c	SPBC4C3.05c	ulp2	nuc1	-	rpa1|rpa190	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946559	2542268	2543333	278737	279756	SPAC17A5.07c	SPAC694.02	ulp2	SPAC694.02	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946560	2542268	2542204	278737	278679	SPAC17A5.07c	SPAC17A5.14	ulp2	exo2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946561	2542268	2541280	278737	277793	SPAC17A5.07c	SPBP23A10.07	ulp2	rpa2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946562	2542268	2542674	278737	279127	SPAC17A5.07c	SPAC26A3.12c	ulp2	dhp1	-	rat1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946563	2542268	2539295	278737	275863	SPAC17A5.07c	SPCC417.08	ulp2	tef3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946564	2542268	2539938	278737	276482	SPAC17A5.07c	SPBC17D11.05	ulp2	tif32	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946565	2542268	2543621	278737	280035	SPAC17A5.07c	SPAC4A8.16c	ulp2	tif33	-	SPAC823.01c|SPAC1E11.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946566	2542268	2539972	278737	276516	SPAC17A5.07c	SPBC16H5.02	ulp2	pfk1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946567	2542268	3361483	278737	280559	SPAC17A5.07c	SPAC513.01c	ulp2	eft201	-	SPAPYUK71.04c|eft2-1|etf2|eft2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946568	2542268	2539544	278737	276105	SPAC17A5.07c	SPCP31B10.07	ulp2	eft202	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946569	2542268	2541348	278737	277859	SPAC17A5.07c	SPBP4H10.15	ulp2	SPBP4H10.15	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946570	2542268	2542268	278737	278737	SPAC17A5.07c	SPAC17A5.07c	ulp2	ulp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946571	2542268	2542090	278737	278567	SPAC17A5.07c	SPAC25G10.08	ulp2	SPAC25G10.08	-	p116	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946572	2542268	2540778	278737	277297	SPAC17A5.07c	SPBC19G7.10c	ulp2	SPBC19G7.10c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946573	2542268	2541274	278737	277788	SPAC17A5.07c	SPBP8B7.20c	ulp2	nop2	-	SPBP8B7.20c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946574	2542268	2541654	278737	278150	SPAC17A5.07c	SPAC22G7.05	ulp2	kri1	-	SPAC22G7.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946575	2542268	2542666	278737	279119	SPAC17A5.07c	SPAC1142.04	ulp2	SPAC1142.04	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946576	2542268	2540086	278737	276624	SPAC17A5.07c	SPBC16H5.12c	ulp2	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946577	2542268	2540199	278737	276732	SPAC17A5.07c	SPBC1709.05	ulp2	sks2	-	hsc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946578	2542268	2540699	278737	277223	SPAC17A5.07c	SPBC800.08	ulp2	gcd10	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946579	2542268	2541383	278737	277894	SPAC17A5.07c	SPBP8B7.16c	ulp2	dbp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946580	2542268	2539917	278737	276461	SPAC17A5.07c	SPBC839.15c	ulp2	tef103	-	ef1a-c|ef1-b|efa13	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946581	2542268	2539035	278737	275608	SPAC17A5.07c	SPCC794.09c	ulp2	tef101	-	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946582	2542268	2541984	278737	278469	SPAC17A5.07c	SPAC23A1.10	ulp2	tef102	-	ef1a-b|ef1a-d|efa1|SPBC24E9.15c|tef1-b|tef1-d	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946583	2542268	2541062	278737	277577	SPAC17A5.07c	SPBC660.11	ulp2	tcg1	-	mug187	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946584	2542268	2542256	278737	278726	SPAC17A5.07c	SPAC29A4.08c	ulp2	prp19	-	cwf8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946585	2542268	2541530	278737	278030	SPAC17A5.07c	SPAC57A10.10c	ulp2	sla1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946586	2542268	2542265	278737	278734	SPAC17A5.07c	SPAC17A5.03	ulp2	rpl301	-	rpl3|rpl3-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946587	2542268	2543309	278737	279733	SPAC17A5.07c	SPAPB8E5.06c	ulp2	rpl302	-	rpl3-2|rpl3-b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946588	2542268	2543153	278737	279585	SPAC17A5.07c	SPAC821.05	ulp2	SPAC821.05	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946589	2542268	2542942	278737	279383	SPAC17A5.07c	SPAC32A11.04c	ulp2	tif212	-	SPAC6B12.17c|tif22	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946590	2542268	2542273	278737	278742	SPAC17A5.07c	SPAC17H9.13c	ulp2	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946591	2542268	2540215	278737	276748	SPAC17A5.07c	SPBC83.14c	ulp2	rfc5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946592	2542268	2540547	278737	277074	SPAC17A5.07c	SPBC32F12.11	ulp2	tdh1	-	gpd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946593	2542268	2539321	278737	275887	SPAC17A5.07c	SPCC16C4.15	ulp2	rml2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946594	2542268	2540975	278737	277491	SPAC17A5.07c	SPBC354.12	ulp2	gpd3	-	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946595	2542268	2543455	278737	279875	SPAC17A5.07c	SPAC3G9.09c	ulp2	tif211	-	eIF2alpha	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946596	2542268	2538897	278737	275475	SPAC17A5.07c	SPCC1183.07	ulp2	SPCC1183.07	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946597	2542268	2542327	278737	278793	SPAC17A5.07c	SPAC16C9.06c	ulp2	upf1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946598	2542268	2541505	278737	278007	SPAC17A5.07c	SPAC57A7.04c	ulp2	pabp	-	pab1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 3, table 2/S1.	-	BIOGRID
946599	2540927	2542290	277443	278758	SPBC365.06	SPAC17C9.03	pmt3	tif471	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jongjitwimol J (2014)	24818994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 5.	-	BIOGRID
947073	2541336	2540047	277847	276585	SPBP35G2.10	SPBC16C6.10	mit1	chp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Creamer KM (2014)	24662054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
947074	2541336	326601	277847	160074	SPBP35G2.10	BOS_15646	mit1	H3F3A	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Creamer KM (2014)	24662054	284812	9913	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
947075	2541336	2542070	277847	278547	SPBP35G2.10	SPAC29B12.02c	mit1	set2	-	kmt3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Creamer KM (2014)	24662054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation|protein/peptide distribution	Set2 strongly synergizes with Mit1 to block accumulation of centromeric and subtelomeric transcripts relative to two control genes|double mutant shows a greater defect in nucleosome occupancy	-	BIOGRID
947076	2540821	2542513	277339	278971	SPBC800.03	SPAC1952.05	clr3	gcn5	-	kat2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Creamer KM (2014)	24662054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue	combined deletion of gcn5 and mst2 only partially rescued the NFR formation seen in the clr3 mutant strain and did not suppress the mit1 mutant phenotype at all|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
947077	2540821	2542170	277339	278645	SPBC800.03	SPAC17G8.13c	clr3	mst2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Creamer KM (2014)	24662054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue	combined deletion of gcn5 and mst2 only partially rescued the NFR formation seen in the clr3 mutant strain and did not suppress the mit1 mutant phenotype at all|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
948316	2540833	2543339	277351	279762	SPBC18H10.20c	SPAC630.13c	any1	tsc2	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakase Y (2013)	23813957	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient uptake	any1-66 allele; leu1-32 mutant background; growth on low leucine restored	-	BIOGRID
948317	2540833	2541869	277351	278359	SPBC18H10.20c	SPAC22F3.13	any1	tsc1	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakase Y (2013)	23813957	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient uptake	any1-66 allele; leu1-32 mutant background; growth on low leucine restored	-	BIOGRID
948318	2541818	2543339	278309	279762	SPAC11G7.02	SPAC630.13c	pub1	tsc2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakase Y (2013)	23813957	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient uptake	pub1-82 allele; leu1-32 mutant background; growth on low leucine restored	-	BIOGRID
948319	2541818	2541869	278309	278359	SPAC11G7.02	SPAC22F3.13	pub1	tsc1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakase Y (2013)	23813957	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nutrient uptake	pub1-82 allele; leu1-32 mutant background; growth on low leucine restored	-	BIOGRID
948320	2540833	2541818	277351	278309	SPBC18H10.20c	SPAC11G7.02	any1	pub1	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nakase Y (2013)	23813957	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
948321	2541818	2540833	278309	277351	SPAC11G7.02	SPBC18H10.20c	pub1	any1	-	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nakase Y (2013)	23813957	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
948322	2540833	2541818	277351	278309	SPBC18H10.20c	SPAC11G7.02	any1	pub1	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nakase Y (2013)	23813957	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	any1-66 allele	-	BIOGRID
948323	2540833	2541042	277351	277557	SPBC18H10.20c	SPBC359.03c	any1	aat1	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nakase Y (2013)	23813957	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
948325	2543339	2540833	279762	277351	SPAC630.13c	SPBC18H10.20c	tsc2	any1	-	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakase Y (2013)	23813957	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution	translocation of Aat1 to the plasma membrane in response to changes in nitrogen availability	-	BIOGRID
948326	2543339	2541818	279762	278309	SPAC630.13c	SPAC11G7.02	tsc2	pub1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakase Y (2013)	23813957	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution	translocation of Aat1 to the plasma membrane in response to changes in nitrogen availability	-	BIOGRID
948327	2540720	2540833	277243	277351	SPBC216.07c	SPBC18H10.20c	tor2	any1	SPBC646.01c	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakase Y (2013)	23813957	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution	translocation of Aat1 to the plasma membrane in response to changes in nitrogen availability; tor2-ts10 allele	-	BIOGRID
948328	2540720	2541818	277243	278309	SPBC216.07c	SPAC11G7.02	tor2	pub1	SPBC646.01c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakase Y (2013)	23813957	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution	translocation of Aat1 to the plasma membrane in response to changes in nitrogen availability; tor2-ts10 allele	-	BIOGRID
948428	2541592	2542135	278089	278611	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC13A11.04c	cut9	ubp8	dre1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Elmore ZC (2014)	24948786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	cut9-665 allele; improved growth at 32 deg C but not at 36 deg C	-	BIOGRID
948429	2541592	2541157	278089	277672	SPAC6F12.15c	SPBC6B1.06c	cut9	ubp14	dre1	ucp2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Elmore ZC (2014)	24948786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	cut9-665 allele; enhanced growth defect at 29 and 32 deg C	-	BIOGRID
948430	2541592	2543040	278089	279475	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC31G5.13	cut9	rpn11	dre1	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Elmore ZC (2014)	24948786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	cut9-665 and pad1-1 alleles; enhanced growth defect at 29 and 32 deg C	-	BIOGRID
948431	2542615	2542135	279069	278611	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC13A11.04c	cut20	ubp8	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Elmore ZC (2014)	24948786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	lid1-6 allele and either ubp8 null or ubp8-C154S H387A allele; improved growth at 32 deg C	-	BIOGRID
948432	2539639	2542135	276194	278611	SPBC106.09	SPAC13A11.04c	cut4	ubp8	apc1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Elmore ZC (2014)	24948786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	cut4-533 allele; improved growth at 32 and 36 deg C	-	BIOGRID
948433	2543222	2542135	279650	278611	SPAC821.08c	SPAC13A11.04c	slp1	ubp8	cdc20	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Elmore ZC (2014)	24948786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	slp1-362 allele	-	BIOGRID
948437	2539639	3361397	276194	280473	SPBC106.09	SPAC57A10.14	cut4	sgf11	apc1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Elmore ZC (2014)	24948786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	cut4-533 allele; improved growth at 36 deg C	-	BIOGRID
948438	2542615	3361397	279069	280473	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC57A10.14	cut20	sgf11	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Elmore ZC (2014)	24948786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	lid1-6 allele; improved growth at 32 deg C	-	BIOGRID
948439	2542615	2538769	279069	275352	SPAC19G12.01c	SPCC126.04c	cut20	sgf73	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Elmore ZC (2014)	24948786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	lid1-6 allele; improved growth at 32 deg C	-	BIOGRID
948440	2539639	3361305	276194	280381	SPBC106.09	SPBC6B1.12c	cut4	sus1	apc1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Elmore ZC (2014)	24948786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	cut4-533 allele; improved growth at 36 deg C	-	BIOGRID
948441	2542615	3361305	279069	280381	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBC6B1.12c	cut20	sus1	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Elmore ZC (2014)	24948786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	lid1-6 allele; improved growth at 32 deg C	-	BIOGRID
948442	2542615	2539775	279069	276326	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBC14C8.17c	cut20	spt8	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	sep9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Elmore ZC (2014)	24948786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	lid1-6 allele	-	BIOGRID
948461	2541592	2539523	278089	276085	SPAC6F12.15c	SPCC622.09	cut9	htb1	dre1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Elmore ZC (2014)	24948786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	cut9-665 and htb1-K119R alleles	-	BIOGRID
948462	2541592	2541675	278089	278171	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC22F8.12c	cut9	shf1	dre1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Elmore ZC (2014)	24948786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	cut9-665 allele	-	BIOGRID
948463	2541592	2539102	278089	275674	SPAC6F12.15c	SPCC1919.15	cut9	brl1	dre1	SPCC790.01|rfp2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Elmore ZC (2014)	24948786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	cut9-665 allele	-	BIOGRID
948678	2543377	2541313	279799	277825	SPAC3H1.07	SPBP26C9.02c	aru1	car1	car3	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bicho CC (2010)	20460254	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	conversion of arginine to other amino acids was almost completely prevented in a car1/aru1 double deletion strain	-	BIOGRID
948679	2541720	2542233	278214	278705	SPAC23H3.13c	SPAC1B3.12c	gpa2	rpb10	git8	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Roux AE (2010)	20536828	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	respiratory growth:undetermined	Overexpression of the hit gene rescues growth on respiratory medium in the GPA2 mutant background	-	BIOGRID
948680	2541720	2538902	278214	275480	SPAC23H3.13c	SPCC13B11.01	gpa2	adh1	git8	adh	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Roux AE (2010)	20536828	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	respiratory growth:undetermined	Overexpression of the hit gene rescues growth on respiratory medium in the GPA2 mutant background	-	BIOGRID
948681	2541720	2541972	278214	278457	SPAC23H3.13c	SPAC23C11.11	gpa2	cka1	git8	orb5	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Roux AE (2010)	20536828	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	respiratory growth:undetermined	Overexpression of the hit gene rescues growth on respiratory medium in the GPA2 mutant background	-	BIOGRID
948682	2541720	2541117	278214	277632	SPAC23H3.13c	SPBC646.13	gpa2	sds23	git8	moc1|psp1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Roux AE (2010)	20536828	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	respiratory growth:undetermined	Overexpression of the hit gene rescues growth on respiratory medium in the GPA2 mutant background	-	BIOGRID
948683	2539123	2543481	275695	279901	SPCC18B5.03	SPAPB2B4.03	wee1	cig2	-	cyc17	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bueno A (1993)	8455610	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:partial rescue	cig2 mutation caused a partial reversion of the wee1 mutant phenotype with cells dividing at 9.2 um instead of 7.5 um in the single mutant	-	BIOGRID
948684	2540880	2543481	277397	279901	SPBC582.03	SPAPB2B4.03	cdc13	cig2	-	cyc17	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bueno A (1993)	8455610	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression through the G2/M phase transition	some aspects of the cdc13 arrest phenotype are exacerbated by deletion of cdc13	-	BIOGRID
948685	2540880	2542632	277397	279086	SPBC582.03	SPAC24H6.05	cdc13	cdc25	-	sal2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bueno A (1993)	8455610	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
948686	2539123	2543481	275695	279901	SPCC18B5.03	SPAPB2B4.03	wee1	cig2	-	cyc17	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Bueno A (1993)	8455610	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:partial rescue	cig2 mutants partially rescue the mitotic catastrophe seen in a wee1/cdc2 mutant|cig2 mutants partially rescue the mitotic catastrophe seen in a wee1/cdc25 mutant|cig2 mutants partially rescue the mitotic catastrophe seen in a wee1/mik1 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
948687	2540885	2543481	277402	279901	SPBC660.14	SPAPB2B4.03	mik1	cig2	-	cyc17	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Bueno A (1993)	8455610	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:partial rescue	cig2 mutants partially rescue the mitotic catastrophe seen in a wee1/mik1 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
948688	2542632	2543481	279086	279901	SPAC24H6.05	SPAPB2B4.03	cdc25	cig2	sal2	cyc17	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Bueno A (1993)	8455610	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:partial rescue	cig2 mutants partially rescue the mitotic catastrophe seen in a wee1/cdc25 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
948689	2539869	2543481	276415	279901	SPBC11B10.09	SPAPB2B4.03	cdc2	cig2	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	cyc17	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Bueno A (1993)	8455610	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:partial rescue	cig2 mutants partially rescue the mitotic catastrophe seen in a wee1/cdc2 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
948880	2542250	2540083	278720	276621	SPAC17D4.03c	SPBC119.02	cis4	ubc4	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Fang Y (2014)	24454826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	sensitivity of cis4 mull mutant to 0.15M MgCl2 rescued	-	BIOGRID
948881	2542250	2541768	278720	278262	SPAC17D4.03c	SPAC11G7.04	cis4	ubi1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Fang Y (2014)	24454826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	sensitivity of cis4 mull mutant to 0.15M MgCl2 rescued	-	BIOGRID
948882	3361538	2540083	280614	276621	SPAC1705.03c	SPBC119.02	ecm33	ubc4	SPAC23H4.19|SPAC1F2.01	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Fang Y (2014)	24454826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	sensitivity of ecm33 mull mutant to 0.15M MgCl2 rescued	-	BIOGRID
948883	3361538	2541768	280614	278262	SPAC1705.03c	SPAC11G7.04	ecm33	ubi1	SPAC23H4.19|SPAC1F2.01	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Fang Y (2014)	24454826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	sensitivity of ecm33 mull mutant to 0.15M MgCl2 rescued	-	BIOGRID
948884	2542250	2541445	278720	277950	SPAC17D4.03c	SPAC6G10.11c	cis4	ubi3	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Fang Y (2014)	24454826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	sensitivity of cis4 mull mutant to 0.15M MgCl2 rescued	-	BIOGRID
948885	2542250	2541030	278720	277545	SPAC17D4.03c	SPBC337.08c	cis4	ubi4	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Fang Y (2014)	24454826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	sensitivity of cis4 mull mutant to 0.15M MgCl2 rescued	-	BIOGRID
948886	2542250	2541818	278720	278309	SPAC17D4.03c	SPAC11G7.02	cis4	pub1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Fang Y (2014)	24454826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	sensitivity of cis4 null mutant to 0.15M MgCl2 suppressed	-	BIOGRID
948887	2542250	2539956	278720	276500	SPAC17D4.03c	SPBC16E9.11c	cis4	pub3	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Fang Y (2014)	24454826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	sensitivity of cis4 null mutant to 0.15M MgCl2 suppressed	-	BIOGRID
948888	2541818	2542250	278309	278720	SPAC11G7.02	SPAC17D4.03c	pub1	cis4	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Fang Y (2014)	24454826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth	increased sensitivity to high and low temperatures (36 and 17 deg C)	-	BIOGRID
948889	2541030	2541042	277545	277557	SPBC337.08c	SPBC359.03c	ubi4	aat1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Fang Y (2014)	24454826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	likely ubiquitin conjugate; E3:Pub1	-	BIOGRID
948890	2541818	2541306	278309	277818	SPAC11G7.02	SPBP16F5.07	pub1	apm1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Fang Y (2014)	24454826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	increased heat sensitivity and increased sensitivity to 0.12M MgCl2	-	BIOGRID
948891	2541306	2541768	277818	278262	SPBP16F5.07	SPAC11G7.04	apm1	ubi1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Fang Y (2014)	24454826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	apm1 mutant sensitivity to 0.2M MgCl2 partially rescued; Ecm33 localization rescued	-	BIOGRID
948892	2541306	2540083	277818	276621	SPBP16F5.07	SPBC119.02	apm1	ubc4	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Fang Y (2014)	24454826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	apm1 mutant sensitivity to 0.2M MgCl2 partially rescued	-	BIOGRID
951788	2538710	2538762	275294	275345	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC306.04c	xap5	set1	SPCC14G10.06	kmt2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
951789	2538710	2539668	275294	276223	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC11B10.10c	xap5	pht1	SPCC14G10.06	pi001	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation|heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	Antisense transcripts and repeat elemants are synergistically overexpressed in double mutants	-	BIOGRID
953801	2540719	2540348	277242	276877	SPBC216.05	SPBC29A10.05	rad3	exo1	-	mut2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Blaikley EJ (2014)	24623809	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	double mutants show decreased rates of break-induced LOH	-	BIOGRID
953807	2540719	2542696	277242	279149	SPBC216.05	SPAC29B12.03	rad3	spd1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Blaikley EJ (2014)	24623809	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of spd1 partially rescues sensitivity to bleocin	-	BIOGRID
953808	2543289	2542696	279714	279149	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC29B12.03	rad26	spd1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Blaikley EJ (2014)	24623809	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	deletion of spd1 partially rescues sensitivity to bleocin, decreases LOH and increases GC	-	BIOGRID
953810	2543042	2542696	279477	279149	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC29B12.03	paa1	spd1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953811	2543042	2540215	279477	276748	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC83.14c	paa1	rfc5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953812	2543042	2543042	279477	279477	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAP8A3.09c	paa1	paa1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953813	2543042	2542131	279477	278607	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC57A7.12	paa1	SPAC57A7.12	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953814	2543042	2541814	279477	278305	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC23G3.06	paa1	SPAC23G3.06	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953815	2543042	2543131	279477	279563	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC12G12.04	paa1	mcp60	-	hsp60	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953816	2543042	2540547	279477	277074	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC32F12.11	paa1	tdh1	-	gpd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953817	2543042	2538902	279477	275480	SPAP8A3.09c	SPCC13B11.01	paa1	adh1	-	adh	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953818	2543042	2540213	279477	276746	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC17D1.06	paa1	dbp3	-	SPCC17D1.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953819	2543042	2540479	279477	277007	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC2D10.10c	paa1	fib1	-	fib|nop1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953820	2543042	2539938	279477	276482	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC17D11.05	paa1	tif32	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953821	2543042	2540199	279477	276732	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC1709.05	paa1	sks2	-	hsc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953822	2543042	2539333	279477	275899	SPAP8A3.09c	SPCC1902.02	paa1	mug72	-	SPCC663.16c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953823	2543042	2539225	279477	275795	SPAP8A3.09c	SPCC1739.13	paa1	ssa2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953824	2543042	2541460	279477	277962	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC1F5.02	paa1	pdi1	-	SPAC1F5.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953825	2543042	2542869	279477	279314	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC140.02	paa1	gar2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953826	2543042	2540076	279477	276614	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC1734.01c	paa1	esf1	-	SPBC337.17c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953827	2543042	2541364	279477	277875	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBP8B7.11	paa1	nxt3	-	glp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953828	2543042	2540072	279477	276610	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC16H5.07c	paa1	ppa2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953829	2543042	2541144	279477	277659	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC685.06	paa1	rps001	-	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953830	2543042	2542777	279477	279226	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC6F6.03c	paa1	SPAC6F6.03c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953831	2543042	2540051	279477	276589	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC32H8.12c	paa1	act1	-	cps8|pi012	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953832	2543042	2542358	279477	278823	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC1782.09c	paa1	clp1	-	flp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953833	2543042	2538821	279477	275402	SPAP8A3.09c	SPCC584.01c	paa1	SPCC584.01c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953834	2543042	2538708	279477	275292	SPAP8A3.09c	SPCC594.01	paa1	SPCC594.01	-	SPCC736.16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953835	2543042	2542481	279477	278941	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC29A4.04c	paa1	cbf5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953836	2543042	2543557	279477	279974	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC4H3.10c	paa1	pyk1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953837	2543042	2541303	279477	277815	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBP22H7.02c	paa1	SPBP22H7.02c	-	pi029|SPACTOKYO_453.05c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953838	2543042	2543293	279477	279718	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAPJ698.02c	paa1	rps002	-	rps0|rps0-2|rpsa-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953839	2543042	2540191	279477	276724	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC17D11.07c	paa1	rpn2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953840	2543042	2540900	279477	277416	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC530.10c	paa1	anc1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953841	2543042	2543540	279477	279957	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC664.08c	paa1	bfr2	-	SPAC664.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953842	2543042	2539379	279477	275945	SPAP8A3.09c	SPCC188.02	paa1	par1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953843	2543042	2542128	279477	278604	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC821.10c	paa1	sod1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953844	2543042	2538877	279477	275456	SPAP8A3.09c	SPCC1322.04	paa1	fyu1	-	SPCC1322.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953845	2543042	2538689	279477	275274	SPAP8A3.09c	SPCC1795.11	paa1	sum3	-	ded1|moc2|slh3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953846	2543042	2542725	279477	279176	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC3A12.10	paa1	rpl2001	-	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953847	2543042	2540674	279477	277199	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC3F6.04c	paa1	nop14	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953848	2543042	2543412	279477	279834	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC637.07	paa1	moe1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953849	2543042	2541087	279477	277602	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC646.10c	paa1	SPBC646.10c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953850	2543042	2542349	279477	278814	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC1782.05	paa1	ypa2	-	SPAC1782.05|pta2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953851	2543042	2540702	279477	277226	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC19F8.03c	paa1	yap18	-	SPBC19F8.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953852	2543042	2540767	279477	277287	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC19C2.07	paa1	fba1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953853	2543042	2539943	279477	276487	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC14F5.05c	paa1	sam1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953854	2543042	2541089	279477	277604	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC646.09c	paa1	int6	-	yin6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953855	2543042	2541984	279477	278469	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC23A1.10	paa1	tef102	-	ef1a-b|ef1a-d|efa1|SPBC24E9.15c|tef1-b|tef1-d	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953856	2543042	2539668	279477	276223	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC11B10.10c	paa1	pht1	-	pi001	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953857	2543042	2542052	279477	278531	SPAP8A3.09c	SPAC823.15	paa1	ppa1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953858	2543042	2540197	279477	276730	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC1709.02c	paa1	vrs1	-	SPBC1734.18c|ValRS1|vas1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
953859	2543042	2539926	279477	276470	SPAP8A3.09c	SPBC14F5.13c	paa1	pho8	-	SPBC14F5.13c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bernal M (2014)	24634168	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
954004	2538760	2540646	275343	277171	SPCC970.01	SPBC23G7.11	rad16	mag2	rad10|rad20|swi9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kanamitsu K (2007)	18270439	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	mag1/mag2/rad16 mutant show a synergistic sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
954005	2538760	2543565	275343	279981	SPCC970.01	SPAPB24D3.04c	rad16	mag1	rad10|rad20|swi9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kanamitsu K (2007)	18270439	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	mag1/mag2/rad16 mutant show a synergistic sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
957630	2538710	2543272	275294	279700	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1002.07c	xap5	ats1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-15.085602	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957631	2538710	2541432	275294	277937	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1F5.05c	xap5	mso1	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.998349	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957632	2538710	2539600	275294	276158	SPCC1020.12c	SPCP1E11.03	xap5	mug170	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.948053	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957633	2538710	2543024	275294	279460	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1039.02	xap5	SPAC1039.02	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.713263	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957634	2538710	2540516	275294	277044	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC21C3.01c	xap5	vps13a	SPCC14G10.06	SPBC31F10.18c|vps1301	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.606569	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957635	2538710	2541238	275294	277752	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC8E4.05c	xap5	SPBC8E4.05c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.421401	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957636	2538710	2539000	275294	275574	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC1450.06c	xap5	grx3	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-14.391306	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957637	2538710	2539738	275294	276290	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC17G9.09	xap5	tif213	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.472189	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957638	2538710	2540790	275294	277309	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC6B1.05c	xap5	atg7	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.32161	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957639	2538710	2542143	275294	278619	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC17C9.07	xap5	alg8	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-13.314298	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957640	2538710	2541527	275294	278027	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC31A2.09c	xap5	apm4	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.776137	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957641	2538710	2540524	275294	277052	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC21B10.08c	xap5	SPBC21B10.08c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.451771	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957642	2538710	2540357	275294	276886	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC2F12.05c	xap5	SPBC2F12.05c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.443895	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957643	2538710	2542640	275294	279094	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC9E9.12c	xap5	ybt1	SPCC14G10.06	abc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.234194	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957644	2538710	2538874	275294	275453	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC777.06c	xap5	SPCC777.06c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.682672	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957645	2538710	2541053	275294	277568	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC56F2.10c	xap5	alg5	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.575627	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957646	2538710	2542759	275294	279209	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC9G1.07	xap5	SPAC9G1.07	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.100244	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957647	2538710	2542739	275294	279189	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC7D4.08	xap5	SPAC7D4.08	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.081621	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957648	2538710	2540127	275294	276664	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC106.20	xap5	exo70	SPCC14G10.06	SPBC582.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-11.008562	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957649	2538710	2540184	275294	276717	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC106.12c	xap5	SPBC106.12c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.888154	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957650	2538710	2538821	275294	275402	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC584.01c	xap5	SPCC584.01c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.884865	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957651	2538710	2540663	275294	277188	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC56F2.06	xap5	mug147	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.67766	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957652	2538710	2542193	275294	278668	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC9G1.11c	xap5	spn4	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.482038	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957653	2538710	2543320	275294	279744	SPCC1020.12c	SPAPJ695.01c	xap5	SPAPJ695.01c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.321349	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957654	2538710	2543400	275294	279822	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC3G9.11c	xap5	SPAC3G9.11c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.301728	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957655	2538710	2542919	275294	279360	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC6C3.08	xap5	nas6	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC6C3.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.294115	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957656	2538710	2540070	275294	276608	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC119.04	xap5	mei3	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.182254	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957657	2538710	2538972	275294	275546	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC1739.15	xap5	wtf21	SPCC14G10.06	wtf3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-10.181685	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957658	2538710	2543495	275294	279914	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC513.03	xap5	mfm2	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.912883	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957659	2538710	2542498	275294	278957	SPCC1020.12c	SPACUNK4.16c	xap5	SPACUNK4.16c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.411027	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957660	2538710	2540220	275294	276753	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC337.03	xap5	rhn1	SPCC14G10.06	SPBC337.03|iss4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.301172	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957661	2538710	2542917	275294	279358	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC9E9.11	xap5	plr1	SPCC14G10.06	plr	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.019724	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957662	2538710	2539961	275294	276505	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC1198.09	xap5	ubc16	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.895897	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957663	2538710	2539575	275294	276135	SPCC1020.12c	SPCP20C8.02c	xap5	SPCP20C8.02c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.884246	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957664	2538710	2540893	275294	277409	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC543.10	xap5	get1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.819529	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2|threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957665	2538710	2542318	275294	278784	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC16C9.05	xap5	cph1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.798745	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957666	2538710	2540074	275294	276612	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC119.03	xap5	SPBC119.03	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.693122	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957667	2538710	2540551	275294	277078	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC23E6.01c	xap5	cxr1	SPCC14G10.06	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.620275	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957668	2538710	2542791	275294	279240	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC167.04	xap5	pam17	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.480804	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957669	2538710	2542060	275294	278538	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC23C11.14	xap5	zhf1	SPCC14G10.06	zhf	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.423442	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957670	2538710	2540290	275294	276821	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC29A3.02c	xap5	his7	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.394577	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957671	2538710	2542723	275294	279174	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC25H1.03	xap5	atg101	SPCC14G10.06	mug66	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.291758	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957672	2538710	2540139	275294	276676	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC1773.06c	xap5	adh8	SPCC14G10.06	SPBC1773.06c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.218975	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957673	2538710	2542127	275294	278603	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1952.12c	xap5	csn71	SPCC14G10.06	csn7|csn7a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.987806	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957674	2538710	2542220	275294	278694	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1A6.03c	xap5	SPAC1A6.03c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.819938	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2|threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957675	2538710	2540798	275294	277317	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC19C7.01	xap5	mni1	SPCC14G10.06	SPBC32F12.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.798979	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957676	2538710	2539667	275294	276222	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC13G1.08c	xap5	ash2	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.719713	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957677	2538710	2542082	275294	278559	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC29B12.10c	xap5	pgt1	SPCC14G10.06	opt1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.697838	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957678	2538710	2539165	275294	275736	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC1281.04	xap5	SPCC1281.04	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.42447	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957679	2538710	2540930	275294	277446	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC354.10	xap5	def1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.379587	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957680	2538710	2543077	275294	279510	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC806.04c	xap5	SPAC806.04c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.301807	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957681	2538710	2539160	275294	275732	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC18.17c	xap5	SPCC18.17c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.210596	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957682	2538710	2539156	275294	275728	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC1450.08c	xap5	wtf16	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.208623	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957683	2538710	2542826	275294	279273	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC13G6.09	xap5	SPAC13G6.09	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.191482	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957684	2538710	2540850	275294	277367	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC18A7.02c	xap5	SPBC18A7.02c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.188865	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957685	2538710	2542250	275294	278720	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC17D4.03c	xap5	cis4	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.114175	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957686	2538710	2542875	275294	279320	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC13G7.02c	xap5	ssa1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.094956	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957687	2538710	2542921	275294	279362	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1093.01	xap5	ppr5	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC12B10.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.094233	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957688	2538710	2543563	275294	279979	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC664.02c	xap5	arp8	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.992553	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957689	2538710	3361400	275294	280476	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1093.06c	xap5	dhc1	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC30C2.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.890734	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957690	2538710	2542969	275294	279409	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC4G8.10	xap5	gos1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.783423	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957691	2538710	2540540	275294	277067	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC23E6.10c	xap5	SPBC23E6.10c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.700064	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957692	2538710	2540351	275294	276880	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC2G2.10c	xap5	mug110	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.682344	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957693	2538710	2541844	275294	278335	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC22A12.17c	xap5	SPAC22A12.17c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.616501	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957694	2538710	2540595	275294	277121	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC21C3.02c	xap5	dep1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.511861	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957695	2538710	2543066	275294	279499	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC343.12	xap5	rds1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.486966	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957696	2538710	2542341	275294	278807	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC16E8.17c	xap5	SPAC16E8.17c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.399529	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957697	2538710	2540383	275294	276912	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC31E1.02c	xap5	pmr1	SPCC14G10.06	cps5|pgak2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.381485	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957698	2538710	2542976	275294	279414	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC9E9.09c	xap5	atd1	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.203118	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957699	2538710	2542184	275294	278659	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC17C9.13c	xap5	cut8	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.198753	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957700	2538710	2542237	275294	278709	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC19E9.02	xap5	fin1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.978621	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957701	2538710	2542103	275294	278579	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC31G5.11	xap5	pac2	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.976736	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957702	2538710	2541062	275294	277577	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC660.11	xap5	tcg1	SPCC14G10.06	mug187	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.814635	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957703	2538710	2542254	275294	278724	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC30D11.04c	xap5	nup124	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.805202	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957704	2538710	2543436	275294	279856	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC823.05c	xap5	tlg2	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.786541	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957705	2538710	2540787	275294	277306	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC1921.07c	xap5	sgf29	SPCC14G10.06	SPBC21D10.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.724465	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957706	2538710	2540849	275294	277366	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC428.11	xap5	met17	SPCC14G10.06	SPBC428.11|cys2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.706318	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957707	2538710	2543096	275294	279528	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC977.05c	xap5	SPAC977.05c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.69276	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957708	2538710	2539499	275294	276062	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC622.08c	xap5	hta1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.682561	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957709	2538710	2539068	275294	275640	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC1442.11c	xap5	SPCC1442.11c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.601107	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957710	2538710	2542950	275294	279390	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC12B10.03	xap5	bun62	SPCC14G10.06	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.599237	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957711	2538710	2539354	275294	275920	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC4F11.03c	xap5	SPCC4F11.03c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.376111	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957712	2538710	2539857	275294	276404	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC1604.20c	xap5	tea2	SPCC14G10.06	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.311765	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957713	2538710	2542598	275294	279052	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC6G10.08	xap5	idp1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.293477	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957714	2538710	2542021	275294	278504	SPCC1020.12c	SPAP14E8.02	xap5	tos4	SPCC14G10.06	SPAP14E8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.291614	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957715	2538710	2540975	275294	277491	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC354.12	xap5	gpd3	SPCC14G10.06	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.285843	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957716	2538710	2542055	275294	278534	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC6G9.03c	xap5	mug183	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.211017	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957717	2538710	2541776	275294	278270	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC23H3.05c	xap5	swd1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.183825	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957718	2538710	2540885	275294	277402	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC660.14	xap5	mik1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.183464	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957719	2538710	2540938	275294	277454	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC365.14c	xap5	uge1	SPCC14G10.06	gal10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.181173	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957720	2538710	2540734	275294	277257	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC19G7.09	xap5	ulp1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.082707	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957721	2538710	2542299	275294	278766	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC18B11.10	xap5	tup11	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.079238	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957722	2538710	2539937	275294	276481	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC1539.08	xap5	arf6	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.016891	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957723	2538710	2540686	275294	277211	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC21D10.10	xap5	bdc1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.992865	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957724	2538710	2539352	275294	275918	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC188.07	xap5	ccq1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.981337	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957725	2538710	2543245	275294	279673	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC56F8.06c	xap5	alg10	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.894293	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957726	2538710	2542120	275294	278596	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC6F6.13c	xap5	SPAC6F6.13c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.784626	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957727	2538710	2539583	275294	276142	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC777.04	xap5	SPCC777.04	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.706855	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957728	2538710	2539402	275294	275967	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC613.03	xap5	SPCC613.03	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.701348	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957729	2538710	3361491	275294	280567	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1805.08	xap5	dlc1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.693959	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957730	2538710	2542141	275294	278617	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC17C9.05c	xap5	pmc3	SPCC14G10.06	med27|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.684732	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957731	2538710	2540061	275294	276599	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC119.12	xap5	rud3	SPCC14G10.06	SPBC119.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.606585	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957732	2538710	2539147	275294	275719	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC622.12c	xap5	gdh1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.586923	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957733	2538710	2541793	275294	278284	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC22H10.02	xap5	SPAC22H10.02	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.520598	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957734	2538710	2543102	275294	279534	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC31G5.21	xap5	SPAC31G5.21	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.520046	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957735	2538710	2539332	275294	275898	SPCC1020.12c	SPCPB1C11.01	xap5	amt1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.517864	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957736	2538710	2540093	275294	276631	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC115.02c	xap5	afg1	SPCC14G10.06	SPBC115.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.414369	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957737	2538710	2542378	275294	278842	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1805.04	xap5	nup132	SPCC14G10.06	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.386755	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957738	2538710	2543683	275294	280097	SPCC1020.12c	SPAPB1E7.04c	xap5	SPAPB1E7.04c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.304431	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957739	2538710	2541689	275294	278185	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC24C9.05c	xap5	mug70	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.215207	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957740	2538710	2540643	275294	277168	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC19G7.06	xap5	mbx1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.204854	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957741	2538710	2543687	275294	280101	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC3C7.04	xap5	SPAC3C7.04	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.201353	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957742	2538710	2542747	275294	279197	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC15A10.06	xap5	SPAC15A10.06	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.178122	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957743	2538710	2540086	275294	276624	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC16H5.12c	xap5	SPBC16H5.12c	SPCC14G10.06	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.111895	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957744	2538710	2542873	275294	279318	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC9G1.02	xap5	wis4	SPCC14G10.06	wak1|wik1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.100755	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957745	2538710	2540501	275294	277029	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC27B12.11c	xap5	pho7	SPCC14G10.06	SPBC27B12.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.094044	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957746	2538710	2543383	275294	279805	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC869.08	xap5	pcm2	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.010571	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957747	2538710	2540026	275294	276570	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC16D10.08c	xap5	hsp104	SPCC14G10.06	SPBC16D10.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.009835	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957748	2538710	2541471	275294	277973	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1F5.03c	xap5	SPAC1F5.03c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.994501	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957749	2538710	2540886	275294	277403	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC4F6.10	xap5	vps901	SPCC14G10.06	vps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.981953	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957750	2538710	2540429	275294	276957	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC29A10.07	xap5	pom152	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.911618	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957751	2538710	2541889	275294	278379	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC2F7.03c	xap5	pom1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.901726	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957752	2538710	2543064	275294	279497	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC3G6.01	xap5	hrp3	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.898537	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957753	2538710	2540281	275294	276812	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC2G2.14	xap5	csi1	SPCC14G10.06	SPBC2G2.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.896095	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957754	2538710	2540829	275294	277347	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC800.09	xap5	sum2	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.824934	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957755	2538710	2540836	275294	277354	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC18H10.19	xap5	vps38	SPCC14G10.06	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.817953	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957756	2538710	2542502	275294	278960	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC139.06	xap5	hat1	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.814863	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957757	2538710	2540095	275294	276633	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC115.03	xap5	SPBC115.03	SPCC14G10.06	SPBC839.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.784947	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957758	2538710	2541104	275294	277619	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC6B1.03c	xap5	SPBC6B1.03c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.78077	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957759	2538710	2543270	275294	279698	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1002.02	xap5	pom34	SPCC14G10.06	mug31	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.779696	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957760	2538710	2543445	275294	279865	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC4F10.13c	xap5	mpd2	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.71989	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957761	2538710	2541558	275294	278057	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1F7.08	xap5	fio1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.700952	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957762	2538710	2542352	275294	278817	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1782.02c	xap5	SPAC1782.02c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.697893	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957763	2538710	2539809	275294	276359	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC16E9.02c	xap5	SPBC16E9.02c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.687176	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957764	2538710	2540929	275294	277445	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC354.03	xap5	swd3	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.684338	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957765	2538710	2540800	275294	277319	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC409.20c	xap5	psh3	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.604801	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957766	2538710	2541118	275294	277633	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC713.08	xap5	mim1	SPCC14G10.06	tom13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.595625	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957767	2538710	2542933	275294	279374	SPCC1020.12c	SPAPYUG7.06	xap5	sdu1	SPCC14G10.06	mug67|hag1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.589952	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957768	2538710	2541311	275294	277823	SPCC1020.12c	SPBP8B7.09c	xap5	los1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.578846	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957769	2538710	2539310	275294	275877	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC285.17	xap5	spp27	SPCC14G10.06	uaf30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.517678	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2|threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957770	2538710	2541959	275294	278446	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC23C4.03	xap5	hrk1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.511426	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957771	2538710	2540867	275294	277384	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC4F6.11c	xap5	SPBC4F6.11c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.509123	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957772	2538710	2541899	275294	278389	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC22E12.11c	xap5	set3	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.487042	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957773	2538710	2539167	275294	275738	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC1281.08	xap5	wtf11	SPCC14G10.06	meu24	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.480697	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957774	2538710	2540029	275294	276573	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC16A3.01	xap5	spn3	SPCC14G10.06	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.476689	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957775	2538710	2539827	275294	276376	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC1861.02	xap5	abp2	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.421902	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957776	2538710	2539028	275294	275601	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC1281.07c	xap5	SPCC1281.07c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.420483	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957777	2538710	2543250	275294	279678	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC3G9.15c	xap5	fcf2	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.414803	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957778	2538710	2540706	275294	277229	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC19C7.12c	xap5	omh1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.408729	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957779	2538710	2538861	275294	275441	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC1620.11	xap5	nup97	SPCC14G10.06	mug87	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.408642	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957780	2538710	2542490	275294	278949	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC30D11.02c	xap5	SPAC30D11.02c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.402872	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957781	2538710	2540352	275294	276881	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC215.03c	xap5	csn1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.391019	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957782	2538710	2543110	275294	279542	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC56E4.06c	xap5	ggt2	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387695	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957783	2538710	2539875	275294	276421	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC16A3.12c	xap5	SPBC16A3.12c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.377505	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957784	2538710	2540338	275294	276867	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC2G2.13c	xap5	dcd1	SPCC14G10.06	SPBC2G2.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.314191	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957785	2538710	2543434	275294	279854	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC8F11.02c	xap5	dph3	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.312287	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957786	2538710	2543071	275294	279504	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC3C7.06c	xap5	pit1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.306258	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957787	2538710	2542345	275294	278811	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1705.02	xap5	SPAC1705.02	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC1F2.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.298966	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957788	2538710	2541522	275294	278023	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC23E2.01	xap5	fep1	SPCC14G10.06	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.298265	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957789	2538710	2543370	275294	279792	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC630.07c	xap5	SPAC630.07c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.294637	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957790	2538710	2538811	275294	275392	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC330.03c	xap5	SPCC330.03c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.220399	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957791	2538710	2538779	275294	275360	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC569.07	xap5	SPCC569.07	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.212708	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957792	2538710	2543160	275294	279591	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC31A2.14	xap5	bun107	SPCC14G10.06	wdr48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.185428	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957793	2538710	2541258	275294	277772	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC8E4.01c	xap5	SPBC8E4.01c	SPCC14G10.06	SPBP4G3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.182923	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957794	2538710	2540267	275294	276798	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC32C12.03c	xap5	ppk25	SPCC14G10.06	kin2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.178343	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957795	2538710	2541058	275294	277573	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC3H7.09	xap5	erf2	SPCC14G10.06	mug142	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.176954	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957796	2538710	2540433	275294	276961	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC2D10.06	xap5	rep1	SPCC14G10.06	rec16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.116323	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957797	2538710	2543681	275294	280095	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC9.02c	xap5	SPAC9.02c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.112701	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957798	2538710	2543555	275294	279972	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC922.05c	xap5	SPAC922.05c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.110601	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957799	2538710	2541650	275294	278146	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC14C4.12c	xap5	laf1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.110044	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957800	2538710	2542685	275294	279138	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC26A3.06	xap5	bud23	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC26A3.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.107555	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957801	2538710	2540691	275294	277216	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC20F10.05	xap5	nrl1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.103434	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957802	2538710	2542358	275294	278823	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1782.09c	xap5	clp1	SPCC14G10.06	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.100139	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957803	2538710	2543301	275294	279726	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC977.17	xap5	SPAC977.17	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.092281	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957804	2538710	2540773	275294	277293	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC405.06	xap5	SPBC405.06	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.079393	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957805	2538710	2539454	275294	276017	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC622.15c	xap5	SPCC622.15c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.077722	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957806	2538710	2539913	275294	276457	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC11G11.03	xap5	mrt4	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.076385	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957807	2538710	2541257	275294	277771	SPCC1020.12c	SPBP23A10.14c	xap5	ell1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.075884	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957808	2538710	2539533	275294	276095	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC622.01c	xap5	SPCC622.01c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.024909	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957809	2538710	2542549	275294	279006	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC19A8.11c	xap5	SPAC19A8.11c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.998512	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957810	2538710	2541536	275294	278036	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1071.02	xap5	mms19	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.993579	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957811	2538710	2540698	275294	277222	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC215.11c	xap5	SPBC215.11c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.921547	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957812	2538710	2540751	275294	277273	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC20F10.10	xap5	psl1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.914197	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957813	2538710	2542946	275294	279386	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC6F12.03c	xap5	fsv1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.903292	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957814	2538710	2542700	275294	279153	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC26H5.08c	xap5	bgl2	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.902573	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957815	2538710	5802962	275294	858100	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC17D4.01	xap5	pex7	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC1834.12|SPAP17D4.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.897473	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957816	2538710	2542472	275294	278933	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC9E9.13	xap5	wos2	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.887733	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957817	2538710	2543508	275294	279926	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC8F11.10c	xap5	pvg1	SPCC14G10.06	SPACUNK4.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.817996	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957818	2538710	2539736	275294	276288	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC12C2.12c	xap5	glo1	SPCC14G10.06	SPBC21D10.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.812856	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957819	2538710	3361381	275294	280457	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC12G12.01c	xap5	SPAC12G12.01c	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC630.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.81044	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957820	2538710	2540933	275294	277449	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC36.06c	xap5	spo9	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.795225	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957821	2538710	2539593	275294	276151	SPCC1020.12c	SPCP20C8.01c	xap5	SPCP20C8.01c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.792074	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957822	2538710	2539939	275294	276483	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC11G11.01	xap5	fis1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.790518	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957823	2538710	3361210	275294	280286	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC16E9.16c	xap5	lsd90	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.786502	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957824	2538710	2540380	275294	276909	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC1A4.05	xap5	blt1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.778678	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957825	2538710	2542724	275294	279175	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC767.01c	xap5	vps1	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.777498	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957826	2538710	2541831	275294	278322	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC23G3.03	xap5	sib2	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.72466	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957827	2538710	2543561	275294	279977	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC922.04	xap5	SPAC922.04	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.713448	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957828	2538710	2543437	275294	279857	SPCC1020.12c	SPAPB1A10.14	xap5	pof15	SPCC14G10.06	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.71141	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957829	2538710	2538795	275294	275376	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC1884.01	xap5	SPCC1884.01	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.704061	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957830	2538710	2543567	275294	279983	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC890.03	xap5	ppk16	SPCC14G10.06	mug92	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.695984	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957831	2538710	2539729	275294	276281	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC11B10.07c	xap5	ivn1	SPCC14G10.06	pi004|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.695181	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957832	2538710	2541192	275294	277706	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC83.17	xap5	SPBC83.17	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.691449	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957833	2538710	2541357	275294	277868	SPCC1020.12c	SPBPB7E8.01	xap5	SPBPB7E8.01	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.687673	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957834	2538710	2541436	275294	277941	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC11H11.03c	xap5	SPAC11H11.03c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.680413	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957835	2538710	2542175	275294	278650	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1F3.02c	xap5	mkh1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.680412	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957836	2538710	2542798	275294	279246	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC13C5.06c	xap5	mug121	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.678645	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957837	2538710	2539700	275294	276253	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC1685.15c	xap5	klp6	SPCC14G10.06	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.624137	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957838	2538710	2538714	275294	275298	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC330.11	xap5	btb1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.621321	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957839	2538710	2541006	275294	277521	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC4C3.08	xap5	mug136	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.614099	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957840	2538710	2540979	275294	277495	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC3H7.10	xap5	elp6	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.590783	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957841	2538710	2540957	275294	277473	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC409.11	xap5	meu18	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.587655	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957842	2538710	2542861	275294	279307	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC13G7.13c	xap5	msa1	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC6C3.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.585474	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957843	2538710	2543144	275294	279576	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC3F10.05c	xap5	mug113	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.579373	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957844	2538710	2540342	275294	276871	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC2G2.01c	xap5	liz1	SPCC14G10.06	SPBC4B4.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57846	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957845	2538710	2539715	275294	276268	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC1778.09	xap5	SPBC1778.09	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578362	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957846	2538710	2543254	275294	279682	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1006.03c	xap5	red1	SPCC14G10.06	iss3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.576295	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957847	2538710	2539953	275294	276497	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC1709.11c	xap5	png2	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.575976	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957848	2538710	2540647	275294	277172	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC18H10.07	xap5	SPBC18H10.07	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517705	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957849	2538710	2539217	275294	275787	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC1223.03c	xap5	gut2	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.517442	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957850	2538710	2540661	275294	277186	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC23E6.03c	xap5	nta1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.51208	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957851	2538710	2539117	275294	275689	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC74.06	xap5	mak3	SPCC14G10.06	phk2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.506563	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957852	2538710	2538769	275294	275352	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC126.04c	xap5	sgf73	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.501193	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957853	2538710	2540496	275294	277024	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC800.11	xap5	SPBC800.11	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.000023	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957854	2538710	2543510	275294	279928	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC30D11.07	xap5	nth1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.003285	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957855	2538710	2538735	275294	275319	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC70.10	xap5	SPCC70.10	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.007246	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957856	2538710	2543631	275294	280045	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC458.02c	xap5	SPAC458.02c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.009011	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957857	2538710	2543380	275294	279802	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC4G9.16c	xap5	rpl901	SPCC14G10.06	rpl9-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.017062	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957858	2538710	2539689	275294	276244	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC1861.03	xap5	mak10	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.021972	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957859	2538710	2541334	275294	277845	SPCC1020.12c	SPBP4H10.18c	xap5	SPBP4H10.18c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.081879	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957860	2538710	2539711	275294	276264	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC1683.09c	xap5	frp1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.086242	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957861	2538710	2538981	275294	275555	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC330.06c	xap5	pmp20	SPCC14G10.06	SPCC330.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.089063	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957862	2538710	2542394	275294	278858	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC31G5.12c	xap5	maf1	SPCC14G10.06	n150	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.097995	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957863	2538710	2541545	275294	278045	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC22F8.07c	xap5	rtf1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.105845	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957864	2538710	2541038	275294	277553	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC29A10.01	xap5	ccr1	SPCC14G10.06	SPBC365.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.176654	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957865	2538710	2542135	275294	278611	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC13A11.04c	xap5	ubp8	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.177121	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957866	2538710	2541478	275294	277980	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC2F7.17	xap5	mrf1	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.181973	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957867	2538710	2539514	275294	276076	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC663.14c	xap5	trp663	SPCC14G10.06	SPCC663.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.185349	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957868	2538710	2541066	275294	277581	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC543.02c	xap5	SPBC543.02c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.193303	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957869	2538710	2540856	275294	277373	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC4F6.12	xap5	pxl1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.195534	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957870	2538710	2541797	275294	278288	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC22F3.04	xap5	mug62	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.203875	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957871	2538710	2543139	275294	279571	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC12G12.03	xap5	cip2	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.206772	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957872	2538710	2542847	275294	279293	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1420.01c	xap5	SPAC1420.01c	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC56E4.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.209148	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957873	2538710	2538833	275294	275414	SPCC1020.12c	SPCP1E11.11	xap5	puf6	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.210888	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957874	2538710	2542399	275294	278863	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1805.10	xap5	SPAC1805.10	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.211593	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957875	2538710	2541710	275294	278205	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC343.11c	xap5	msc1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.221316	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957876	2538710	2540222	275294	276755	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC32F12.03c	xap5	gpx1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.221741	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957877	2538710	2542782	275294	279231	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1687.06c	xap5	rpl44	SPCC14G10.06	rpl28	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.224847	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957878	2538710	2540999	275294	277515	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC4B4.04	xap5	SPBC4B4.04	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.279047	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957879	2538710	2539430	275294	275994	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC417.12	xap5	SPCC417.12	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.296072	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957880	2538710	2542981	275294	279419	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC824.02	xap5	bst1	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC824.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.299539	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957881	2538710	2539201	275294	275772	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC188.09c	xap5	pfl4	SPCC14G10.06	SPCC188.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.30337	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957882	2538710	2539408	275294	275973	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC576.12c	xap5	mhf2	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.312995	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957883	2538710	2542262	275294	278731	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC17C9.10	xap5	stm1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.315424	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957884	2538710	2542867	275294	279312	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC343.16	xap5	lys2	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.317463	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957885	2538710	2542022	275294	278505	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC23A1.03	xap5	apt1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.31834	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957886	2538710	2543448	275294	279868	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC3H5.07	xap5	rpl702	SPCC14G10.06	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.384018	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957887	2538710	2541012	275294	277527	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC3H7.12	xap5	rav2	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.395972	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957888	2538710	2541822	275294	278313	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1F7.10	xap5	SPAC1F7.10	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.396203	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957889	2538710	2540023	275294	276567	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC11C11.10	xap5	SPBC11C11.10	SPCC14G10.06	SPBC3B8.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.398875	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957890	2538710	2538774	275294	275356	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC162.06c	xap5	SPCC162.06c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.405451	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957891	2538710	2540327	275294	276857	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC31F10.07	xap5	lsb5	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.409962	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957892	2538710	2541250	275294	277764	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC8D2.17	xap5	gmh4	SPCC14G10.06	SPBC8D2.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.424529	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957893	2538710	2541806	275294	278297	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC4G8.13c	xap5	prz1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.475957	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957894	2538710	2539841	275294	276389	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC17D1.05	xap5	SPBC17D1.05	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.478483	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957895	2538710	2541378	275294	277889	SPCC1020.12c	SPBP8B7.21	xap5	ubp3	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.481684	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957896	2538710	2542462	275294	278923	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC19B12.11c	xap5	SPAC19B12.11c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.486306	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957897	2538710	2540538	275294	277065	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC26H8.03	xap5	cho2	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.491824	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2|threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957898	2538710	2539668	275294	276223	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC11B10.10c	xap5	pht1	SPCC14G10.06	pi001	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.49876	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957899	2538710	2539525	275294	276087	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC613.01	xap5	SPCC613.01	SPCC14G10.06	SPCC757.14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.505731	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957900	2538710	2543586	275294	280001	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC458.04c	xap5	dli1	SPCC14G10.06	dil1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.50676	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957901	2538710	2540928	275294	277444	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC3E7.10	xap5	fma1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.516002	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957902	2538710	2542444	275294	278906	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC17A5.05c	xap5	SPAC17A5.05c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.520504	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957903	2538710	2540016	275294	276560	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC1773.09c	xap5	mug184	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.577363	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957904	2538710	2543662	275294	280076	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC9.07c	xap5	SPAC9.07c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.584214	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957905	2538710	2542032	275294	278514	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC23C11.04c	xap5	pnk1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.585587	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957906	2538710	2540318	275294	276848	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC30B4.04c	xap5	sol1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.623862	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957907	2538710	2542613	275294	279067	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC18B11.03c	xap5	SPAC18B11.03c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.62457	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957908	2538710	2542382	275294	278846	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC6G10.06	xap5	SPAC6G10.06	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.686231	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957909	2538710	2541313	275294	277825	SPCC1020.12c	SPBP26C9.02c	xap5	car1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.691459	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957910	2538710	2541144	275294	277659	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC685.06	xap5	rps001	SPCC14G10.06	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.708672	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957911	2538710	2541272	275294	277786	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC947.03c	xap5	naa38	SPCC14G10.06	mak31	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.713749	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957912	2538710	2543524	275294	279942	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC4D7.07c	xap5	csi2	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC4D7.07c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.714497	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957913	2538710	2542731	275294	279181	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC5H10.09c	xap5	SPAC5H10.09c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.715515	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957914	2538710	2542758	275294	279208	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC15E1.02c	xap5	SPAC15E1.02c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.721885	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957915	2538710	2541742	275294	278236	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC22H10.09	xap5	SPAC22H10.09	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.777631	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957916	2538710	2539136	275294	275708	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC1919.05	xap5	SPCC1919.05	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.794925	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957917	2538710	2542373	275294	278837	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1805.06c	xap5	hem2	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.795488	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957918	2538710	2541438	275294	277943	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC23G3.10c	xap5	ssr3	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.798359	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957919	2538710	2543105	275294	279537	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC343.10	xap5	met11	SPCC14G10.06	mthfr2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.79993	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957920	2538710	2542710	275294	279163	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC750.08c	xap5	SPAC750.08c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.821459	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957921	2538710	2543644	275294	280058	SPCC1020.12c	SPAPB1A10.03	xap5	nxt1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.822959	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957922	2538710	2543384	275294	279806	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC637.06	xap5	gmh5	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.823117	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957923	2538710	2542420	275294	278883	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC19D5.03	xap5	cid1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.877897	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957924	2538710	3361117	275294	280193	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC663.17	xap5	wtf15	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.882134	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957925	2538710	2542883	275294	279328	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1486.04c	xap5	alm1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.898033	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957926	2538710	2543613	275294	280027	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC4F10.19c	xap5	SPAC4F10.19c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.904548	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957927	2538710	2543337	275294	279760	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC959.08	xap5	rpl2102	SPCC14G10.06	rpl21|rpl21-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.911527	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957928	2538710	2539847	275294	276395	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC530.14c	xap5	dsk1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.983054	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957929	2538710	2543087	275294	279520	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC30C2.04	xap5	SPAC30C2.04	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.001487	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957930	2538710	2539774	275294	276325	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC17A3.10	xap5	pas4	SPCC14G10.06	pi036	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.012793	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957931	2538710	2542869	275294	279314	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC140.02	xap5	gar2	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.085619	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957932	2538710	2542033	275294	278515	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC2C4.09	xap5	SPAC2C4.09	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.090034	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957933	2538710	2540480	275294	277008	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC2A9.04c	xap5	san1	SPCC14G10.06	SPBC2A9.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.111727	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957934	2538710	2539628	275294	276185	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC1604.03c	xap5	SPBC1604.03c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.122319	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957935	2538710	2542198	275294	278673	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC6F12.09	xap5	rdp1	SPCC14G10.06	rdr1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.181149	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2|threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957936	2538710	2541130	275294	277645	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC776.11	xap5	rpl2801	SPCC14G10.06	rpl28-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.193202	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957937	2538710	2541559	275294	278058	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC29B12.14c	xap5	SPAC29B12.14c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.194809	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957938	2538710	2541491	275294	277993	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC2C4.16c	xap5	rps801	SPCC14G10.06	rps8|rps8-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.303615	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957939	2538710	2542862	275294	279308	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC140.03	xap5	arb1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.405311	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957940	2538710	2541026	275294	277541	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC337.09	xap5	erg28	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.50374	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957941	2538710	2540504	275294	277032	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC24C6.10c	xap5	dip1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.601516	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957942	2538710	2542714	275294	279167	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC5H10.06c	xap5	adh4	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.613506	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957943	2538710	2542469	275294	278930	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC19A8.04	xap5	erg5	SPCC14G10.06	cyp61	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.693353	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957944	2538710	2543308	275294	279732	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC694.04c	xap5	SPAC694.04c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.69848	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957945	2538710	2540946	275294	277462	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC36.04	xap5	cys11	SPCC14G10.06	cys1a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.880725	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957946	2538710	2542560	275294	279016	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1851.02	xap5	slc1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.08487	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957947	2538710	2542701	275294	279154	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC26H5.05	xap5	mga2	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC26H5.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.180051	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957948	2538710	2541801	275294	278292	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC2F7.08c	xap5	snf5	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.188437	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957949	2538710	2542177	275294	278652	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC17H9.08	xap5	SPAC17H9.08	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.203969	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957950	2538710	2542866	275294	279311	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC9E9.17c	xap5	SPAC9E9.17c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.2844	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957951	2538710	2540326	275294	276856	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC2G5.06c	xap5	hmt2	SPCC14G10.06	cad1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.297785	-	cold sensitivity|colony size|heat sensitivity	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2|37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957952	2538710	2540831	275294	277349	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC428.02c	xap5	eca39	SPCC14G10.06	SPBC582.12c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	4.689936	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957953	2538710	2541464	275294	277966	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC222.08c	xap5	SPAC222.08c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.900011	-	colony size|heat sensitivity	37C, threshold: -2.5 <=  S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957954	2538710	2539169	275294	275740	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC1235.11	xap5	mpc1	SPCC14G10.06	SPCC1235.11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-12.187534	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957955	2538710	2541611	275294	278108	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1527.02	xap5	sft2	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-9.488298	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957956	2538710	2539628	275294	276185	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC1604.03c	xap5	SPBC1604.03c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-8.186512	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957957	2538710	2542689	275294	279142	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC29B12.04	xap5	snz1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.915792	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957958	2538710	2541050	275294	277565	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC428.05c	xap5	arg12	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-7.693744	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957959	2538710	2543412	275294	279834	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC637.07	xap5	moe1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.894316	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957960	2538710	2542251	275294	278721	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC29A4.09	xap5	SPAC29A4.09	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.397162	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957961	2538710	2541181	275294	277695	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC713.05	xap5	SPBC713.05	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-6.276683	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957962	2538710	2541124	275294	277639	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC646.02	xap5	cwf11	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.589609	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957963	2538710	2542874	275294	279319	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC20H4.09	xap5	SPAC20H4.09	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC145.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-5.084233	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957964	2538710	2539071	275294	275643	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC1322.03	xap5	trp1322	SPCC14G10.06	SPCC1322.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.82405	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957965	2538710	2539576	275294	276136	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC794.01c	xap5	zwf2	SPCC14G10.06	SPCC794.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.810596	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957966	2538710	2542707	275294	279160	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC25G10.03	xap5	zip1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.675735	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957967	2538710	2539733	275294	276285	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC16E9.12c	xap5	pab2	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.613981	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957968	2538710	2542418	275294	278881	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1805.07c	xap5	dad2	SPCC14G10.06	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.606238	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957969	2538710	2542895	275294	279339	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC13G6.10c	xap5	asl1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.500822	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957970	2538710	2540498	275294	277026	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC27.02c	xap5	ask1	SPCC14G10.06	mug181	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.488615	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957971	2538710	2543619	275294	280033	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC4F10.04	xap5	ypa1	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.18247	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957972	2538710	2539148	275294	275720	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC132.04c	xap5	gdh2	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.883178	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957973	2538710	3361128	275294	280204	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC1442.04c	xap5	SPCC1442.04c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.810099	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957974	2538710	2540346	275294	276875	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC2F12.03c	xap5	ebs1	SPCC14G10.06	SPBC2F12.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.805211	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957975	2538710	2543059	275294	279493	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC30.04c	xap5	abc4	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.795731	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957976	2538710	2542908	275294	279352	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC13G7.03	xap5	upf3	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.790968	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957977	2538710	2542869	275294	279314	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC140.02	xap5	gar2	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.706256	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957978	2538710	2539488	275294	276051	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC645.08c	xap5	snd1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.590632	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957979	2538710	2538962	275294	275536	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC965.13	xap5	SPCC965.13	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.582988	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957980	2538710	2542468	275294	278929	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1D4.09c	xap5	rtf2	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.516626	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957981	2538710	2539689	275294	276244	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC1861.03	xap5	mak10	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.387459	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957982	2538710	2542362	275294	278826	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1783.02c	xap5	vps66	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.383272	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957983	2538710	2540430	275294	276958	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC25B2.01	xap5	SPBC25B2.01	SPCC14G10.06	SPBC2G5.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.321306	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957984	2538710	2542528	275294	278986	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1B3.08	xap5	SPAC1B3.08	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.307259	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957985	2538710	2539381	275294	275947	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC1739.10	xap5	mug33	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.301988	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957986	2538710	2540415	275294	276943	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC30B4.06c	xap5	SPBC30B4.06c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.222431	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957987	2538710	2538774	275294	275356	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC162.06c	xap5	SPCC162.06c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.216481	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957988	2538710	2539129	275294	275701	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC338.14	xap5	ado1	SPCC14G10.06	SPCC338.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.208504	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957989	2538710	2541789	275294	278281	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC23H4.08	xap5	iwr1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.197123	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957990	2538710	2542906	275294	279350	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC13D6.03c	xap5	trm9	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.195512	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957991	2538710	2542518	275294	278976	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1B3.16c	xap5	vht1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.181214	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957992	2538710	2539750	275294	276302	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC14F5.10c	xap5	SPBC14F5.10c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.177206	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957993	2538710	2542845	275294	279291	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC824.04	xap5	SPAC824.04	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.115614	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957994	2538710	2542555	275294	279012	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1952.06c	xap5	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.113234	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957995	2538710	2542787	275294	279236	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC9G1.08c	xap5	SPAC9G1.08c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.103244	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957996	2538710	2540831	275294	277349	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC428.02c	xap5	eca39	SPCC14G10.06	SPBC582.12c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.099586	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957997	2538710	2541867	275294	278357	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC22E12.14c	xap5	sck2	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.08986	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957998	2538710	2541183	275294	277697	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC725.14	xap5	arg6	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.08645	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
957999	2538710	2540452	275294	276980	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC2A9.11c	xap5	iss9	SPCC14G10.06	SPBC2A9.11c|SPBC2D10.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.08077	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958000	2538710	2542981	275294	279419	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC824.02	xap5	bst1	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC824.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.016376	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958001	2538710	2540341	275294	276870	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC2F12.11c	xap5	rep2	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.010366	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958002	2538710	2540374	275294	276903	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC31F10.02	xap5	SPBC31F10.02	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.010208	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958003	2538710	2543439	275294	279859	SPCC1020.12c	SPAPB1A10.13	xap5	SPAPB1A10.13	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.007651	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958004	2538710	2542424	275294	278886	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1805.14	xap5	SPAC1805.14	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.999716	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958005	2538710	2540278	275294	276809	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC1A4.04	xap5	SPBC1A4.04	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.995598	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958006	2538710	2539726	275294	276278	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC13E7.08c	xap5	leo1	SPCC14G10.06	SPBC13E7.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.981948	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958007	2538710	2541470	275294	277972	SPCC1020.12c	SPAPYUG7.04c	xap5	rpb9	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.975529	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958008	2538710	2540165	275294	276700	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC1683.02	xap5	SPBC1683.02	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.908877	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958009	2538710	2541565	275294	278063	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1250.03	xap5	ubc14	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.89725	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958010	2538710	2543195	275294	279624	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC31G5.14	xap5	gcv1	SPCC14G10.06	n313	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.882525	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958011	2538710	2543457	275294	279877	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC3H1.03	xap5	mug151	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.87953	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958012	2538710	2541772	275294	278266	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC22E12.03c	xap5	hsp3106	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.803161	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958013	2538710	2539215	275294	275785	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC285.16c	xap5	msh6	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.800203	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958014	2538710	2539073	275294	275645	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC1322.02	xap5	pxd1	SPCC14G10.06	SPCC1322.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.797685	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958015	2538710	2539463	275294	276026	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC550.11	xap5	SPCC550.11	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.783172	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958016	2538710	2539249	275294	275819	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC1450.05c	xap5	rox3	SPCC14G10.06	med19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.720277	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958017	2538710	2541941	275294	278428	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC20H4.03c	xap5	tfs1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.711611	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958018	2538710	2542806	275294	279254	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1610.01	xap5	saf5	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.699053	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958019	2538710	2542712	275294	279165	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC25B8.17	xap5	SPAC25B8.17	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.695249	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958020	2538710	2541762	275294	278256	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC139.01c	xap5	SPAC139.01c	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC955.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.680983	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958021	2538710	2542180	275294	278655	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC589.07c	xap5	atg1801	SPCC14G10.06	atg18|atg18a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.622993	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958022	2538710	2542327	275294	278793	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC16C9.06c	xap5	upf1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.61565	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958023	2538710	2539984	275294	276528	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC1289.11	xap5	spf38	SPCC14G10.06	cwf17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.614042	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958024	2538710	2540568	275294	277095	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC28F2.08c	xap5	SPBC28F2.08c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.611327	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958025	2538710	2538750	275294	275333	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC622.04	xap5	SPCC622.04	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.610622	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958026	2538710	2538761	275294	275344	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC622.02	xap5	SPCC622.02	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.604451	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958027	2538710	2540491	275294	277019	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC28E12.04	xap5	SPBC28E12.04	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.596973	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958028	2538710	2539944	275294	276488	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC1198.06c	xap5	SPBC1198.06c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.596314	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958029	2538710	2539472	275294	276035	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC794.03	xap5	SPCC794.03	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.588587	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958030	2538710	2539706	275294	276259	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC16G5.13	xap5	ptf2	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.578141	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958031	2538710	2542652	275294	279106	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1687.15	xap5	gsk3	SPCC14G10.06	skp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.57601	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958032	2538710	2540192	275294	276725	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC1215.01	xap5	shy1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.522722	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958033	2538710	2543453	275294	279873	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC3G9.03	xap5	rpl2301	SPCC14G10.06	rpl23-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.513668	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958034	2538710	2542117	275294	278593	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC17A2.11	xap5	SPAC17A2.11	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509697	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958035	2538710	2539027	275294	275600	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC1322.08	xap5	srk1	SPCC14G10.06	mkp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.509217	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958036	2538710	2542861	275294	279307	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC13G7.13c	xap5	msa1	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC6C3.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.004849	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958037	2538710	2540245	275294	276777	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC31F10.17c	xap5	SPBC31F10.17c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.012076	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958038	2538710	2542519	275294	278977	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC19G12.08	xap5	scs7	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.018877	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958039	2538710	2540310	275294	276840	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC29B5.04c	xap5	SPBC29B5.04c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.023965	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958040	2538710	2543246	275294	279674	SPCC1020.12c	SPAPB8E5.05	xap5	mfm1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.080111	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958041	2538710	2541054	275294	277569	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC3B8.08	xap5	SPBC3B8.08	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.081507	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958042	2538710	2541681	275294	278177	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC14C4.01c	xap5	SPAC14C4.01c	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC19D5.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.096333	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958043	2538710	2543244	275294	279672	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC6B12.06c	xap5	rrg9	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098082	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958044	2538710	2543573	275294	279988	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC869.11	xap5	cat1	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC922.08c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.098577	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958045	2538710	3361491	275294	280567	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1805.08	xap5	dlc1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.103003	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958046	2538710	2543296	275294	279721	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC9E9.03	xap5	leu2	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.106188	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958047	2538710	2541971	275294	278456	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC27F1.05c	xap5	SPAC27F1.05c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.11039	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958048	2538710	2542291	275294	278759	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC17C9.08	xap5	pnu1	SPCC14G10.06	end1|nuc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.184614	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958049	2538710	2542013	275294	278496	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC20H4.11c	xap5	rho5	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.188855	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958050	2538710	2541816	275294	278307	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC22E12.01	xap5	pet3	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC22E12.01|SPAC890.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.20902	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958051	2538710	2539931	275294	276475	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC12C2.09c	xap5	SPBC12C2.09c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.211577	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958052	2538710	2541709	275294	278204	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC3C7.02c	xap5	pil2	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC3C7.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.215246	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958053	2538710	2542547	275294	279004	SPCC1020.12c	SPACUNK4.09	xap5	SPACUNK4.09	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.215663	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958054	2538710	2541266	275294	277780	SPCC1020.12c	SPBP16F5.05c	xap5	yar1	SPCC14G10.06	SPBP16F5.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.215775	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958055	2538710	2540146	275294	276683	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC17A3.06	xap5	SPBC17A3.06	SPCC14G10.06	pi040	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.31621	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958056	2538710	2539168	275294	275739	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC1620.08	xap5	SPCC1620.08	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.318736	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958057	2538710	2542186	275294	278661	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC17C9.14	xap5	SPAC17C9.14	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.388467	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958058	2538710	2543587	275294	280002	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC4D7.02c	xap5	SPAC4D7.02c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.388712	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958059	2538710	5802927	275294	858065	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC1556.06.1	xap5	meu1-1	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC1556.06|meu1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.40456	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958060	2538710	2543046	275294	279481	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC3C7.10	xap5	pex13	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.485057	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958061	2538710	2539050	275294	275623	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC11E10.08	xap5	rik1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.503303	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958062	2538710	2542878	275294	279323	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC57A10.09c	xap5	nhp6	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.512267	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958063	2538710	2540599	275294	277125	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC29A3.10c	xap5	atp14	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.513949	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958064	2538710	2542073	275294	278550	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC26F1.01	xap5	sec74	SPCC14G10.06	SPAPJ691.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.595613	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958065	2538710	2539064	275294	275636	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC126.06	xap5	twf1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.596687	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958066	2538710	2541384	275294	277895	SPCC1020.12c	SPBP8B7.26	xap5	SPBP8B7.26	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.68206	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958067	2538710	2541388	275294	277899	SPCC1020.12c	SPBP8B7.30c	xap5	thi5	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.707874	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958068	2538710	2541187	275294	277701	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC776.14	xap5	plh1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.785327	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958069	2538710	2540811	275294	277330	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC19C7.05	xap5	SPBC19C7.05	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.788976	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958070	2538710	3361512	275294	280588	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC3C7.01c	xap5	sac12	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.814183	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958071	2538710	2543434	275294	279854	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC8F11.02c	xap5	dph3	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.899051	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958072	2538710	2543617	275294	280031	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC4A8.10	xap5	SPAC4A8.10	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.99441	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958073	2538710	2539895	275294	276441	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC1683.10c	xap5	pcl1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.996724	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958074	2538710	2541275	275294	277789	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC947.06c	xap5	SPBC947.06c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.11517	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958075	2538710	2543515	275294	279933	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC4F10.14c	xap5	btf3	SPCC14G10.06	btt1|egd1|nac2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.414138	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958076	2538710	2541912	275294	278402	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC222.16c	xap5	csn3	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC821.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	3.477493	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958077	2538710	2542549	275294	279006	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC19A8.11c	xap5	SPAC19A8.11c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.315108	-	cold sensitivity|colony size	20C, threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958078	2538710	2539108	275294	275680	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC1223.02	xap5	nmt1	SPCC14G10.06	thi3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-4.98532	-	colony size	threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958079	2538710	2539064	275294	275636	SPCC1020.12c	SPCC126.06	xap5	twf1	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-3.224647	-	colony size	threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958080	2538710	2543578	275294	279993	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC9.10	xap5	thi9	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.996781	-	colony size	threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958081	2538710	2541475	275294	277977	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC24B11.09	xap5	mpc2	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC24B11.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.813743	-	colony size	threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958082	2538710	2543593	275294	280008	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC4G9.10	xap5	arg3	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.785738	-	colony size	threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958083	2538710	2542516	275294	278974	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC2F7.04	xap5	pmc2	SPCC14G10.06	med1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.703982	-	colony size	threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958084	2538710	2541279	275294	277792	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC8E4.03	xap5	SPBC8E4.03	SPCC14G10.06	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.677602	-	colony size	threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958085	2538710	2541425	275294	277930	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC2C4.17c	xap5	msy2	SPCC14G10.06	SPAC2C4.17c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.293933	-	colony size	threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958086	2538710	2540219	275294	276752	SPCC1020.12c	SPBC31F10.13c	xap5	hip1	SPCC14G10.06	hir1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.424281	-	colony size	threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
958087	2538710	2542407	275294	278871	SPCC1020.12c	SPAC19B12.06c	xap5	SPAC19B12.06c	SPCC14G10.06	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Anver S (2014)	24957674	284812	284812	High Throughput	2.608744	-	colony size	threshold: -2.5 <= S-score >= +2	-	BIOGRID
986780	2540833	2541818	277351	278309	SPBC18H10.20c	SPAC11G7.02	any1	pub1	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nakashima A (2014)	24876389	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
986781	2541818	2540833	278309	277351	SPAC11G7.02	SPBC18H10.20c	pub1	any1	-	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nakashima A (2014)	24876389	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
986782	2540833	2541818	277351	278309	SPBC18H10.20c	SPAC11G7.02	any1	pub1	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakashima A (2014)	24876389	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:undetermined	overexpression of arn1+ causes increased tolerance to canavanine, which is suppressed by deletion of pub1+	-	BIOGRID
1022575	2540362	2540627	276891	277153	SPBC2F12.08c	SPBC25H2.13c	ceg1	cdc20	pce1	pol2	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Doamekpor SK (2014)	24939935	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1022576	2540362	2541916	276891	278406	SPBC2F12.08c	SPAC23C4.19	ceg1	spt5	pce1	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Doamekpor SK (2014)	24939935	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1022577	2540362	2541916	276891	278406	SPBC2F12.08c	SPAC23C4.19	ceg1	spt5	pce1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Doamekpor SK (2014)	24939935	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1022578	2540362	2540627	276891	277153	SPBC2F12.08c	SPBC25H2.13c	ceg1	cdc20	pce1	pol2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Doamekpor SK (2014)	24939935	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1022579	2539572	3361358	276132	280434	SPCC576.03c	SPBC3F6.03	tpx1	trr1	-	caf4	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Paulo E (2014)	24521463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	respiratory growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
1022580	2542140	2539572	278616	276132	SPAC1783.07c	SPCC576.03c	pap1	tpx1	caf3	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Paulo E (2014)	24521463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	respiratory growth:wild type	deletion of pap1 suppresses the rescue of trr1 by tpx1	-	BIOGRID
1022587	3361358	2539572	280434	276132	SPBC3F6.03	SPCC576.03c	trr1	tpx1	caf4	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Paulo E (2014)	24521463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	genetic complex|trr1/tpx1/ctt1 triple mutants are synthetic lethal	-	BIOGRID
1022588	3361358	2539418	280434	275983	SPBC3F6.03	SPCC757.07c	trr1	ctt1	caf4	cta1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Paulo E (2014)	24521463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	genetic complex|trr1/tpx1/ctt1 triple mutants are synthetic lethal	-	BIOGRID
1022589	2539572	2539418	276132	275983	SPCC576.03c	SPCC757.07c	tpx1	ctt1	-	cta1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Paulo E (2014)	24521463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	genetic complex|trr1/tpx1/ctt1 triple mutants are synthetic lethal	-	BIOGRID
1022590	2539572	2539418	276132	275983	SPCC576.03c	SPCC757.07c	tpx1	ctt1	-	cta1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Paulo E (2014)	24521463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	respiratory growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
1022591	2539572	2539418	276132	275983	SPCC576.03c	SPCC757.07c	tpx1	ctt1	-	cta1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Paulo E (2014)	24521463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
1022592	2539572	2538981	276132	275555	SPCC576.03c	SPCC330.06c	tpx1	pmp20	-	SPCC330.06c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Paulo E (2014)	24521463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	deletion of pmp20, gpx1 and SPBC1773.02c in a tpx1 causes defects in anaerobic growth|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1022593	2539572	2540222	276132	276755	SPCC576.03c	SPBC32F12.03c	tpx1	gpx1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Paulo E (2014)	24521463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	deletion of pmp20, gpx1 and SPBC1773.02c in a tpx1 causes defects in anaerobic growth|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1022594	2539572	2539615	276132	276173	SPCC576.03c	SPBC1773.02c	tpx1	bcp1	-	SPBC1773.02c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Paulo E (2014)	24521463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	deletion of pmp20, gpx1 and SPBC1773.02c in a tpx1 causes defects in anaerobic growth|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1022595	2539572	2539418	276132	275983	SPCC576.03c	SPCC757.07c	tpx1	ctt1	-	cta1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Paulo E (2014)	24521463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chemical compound accumulation	double mutants show a large increase in levels of intracellular peroxides	-	BIOGRID
1022596	2542140	2539418	278616	275983	SPAC1783.07c	SPCC757.07c	pap1	ctt1	caf3	cta1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Paulo E (2014)	24521463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	High levels of expression of catalase were able to suppress to a great extent, but not fully, the peroxide sensitivity of cells lacking Pap1	-	BIOGRID
1022597	2542140	2540329	278616	276859	SPAC1783.07c	SPBC29B5.01	pap1	atf1	caf3	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Paulo E (2014)	24521463	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	High levels of expression of catalase were able to fully suppress the peroxide sensitivity of cells lacking Atf1	-	BIOGRID
1022601	2538936	2541619	275512	278116	SPCC10H11.01	SPAC27F1.09c	prp11	prp10	prp5	sap155|SF3b155	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shao W (2012)	22064476	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1022602	2538936	2543278	275512	279706	SPCC10H11.01	SPAPJ698.03c	prp11	prp12	prp5	sap130|SF3b130	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shao W (2012)	22064476	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1022603	2538936	2542545	275512	279002	SPCC10H11.01	SPAC19G12.07c	prp11	rsd1	prp5	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shao W (2012)	22064476	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1022604	2538936	2540462	275512	276990	SPCC10H11.01	SPBC29A3.07c	prp11	sap14	prp5	sab14|SF3b14a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shao W (2012)	22064476	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1022605	2538936	2541609	275512	278106	SPCC10H11.01	SPAC22F8.10c	prp11	sap145	prp5	SF3b145	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shao W (2012)	22064476	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1022606	2538936	2542426	275512	278888	SPCC10H11.01	SPAC31G5.01	prp11	sap49	prp5	SPAPB1A11.05|SF3b49	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shao W (2012)	22064476	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1022607	2538936	2540865	275512	277382	SPCC10H11.01	SPBC4B4.07c	prp11	usp102	prp5	mud1|U1A	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shao W (2012)	22064476	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1022608	2538936	2541211	275512	277725	SPCC10H11.01	SPBC839.10	prp11	usp107	prp5	snu71	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shao W (2012)	22064476	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1022609	2538936	2541619	275512	278116	SPCC10H11.01	SPAC27F1.09c	prp11	prp10	prp5	sap155|SF3b155	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Shao W (2012)	22064476	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1022610	2538936	2543278	275512	279706	SPCC10H11.01	SPAPJ698.03c	prp11	prp12	prp5	sap130|SF3b130	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Shao W (2012)	22064476	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1022611	2538936	2542545	275512	279002	SPCC10H11.01	SPAC19G12.07c	prp11	rsd1	prp5	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Shao W (2012)	22064476	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1022612	2538936	2541609	275512	278106	SPCC10H11.01	SPAC22F8.10c	prp11	sap145	prp5	SF3b145	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Shao W (2012)	22064476	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1022613	2538936	2542426	275512	278888	SPCC10H11.01	SPAC31G5.01	prp11	sap49	prp5	SPAPB1A11.05|SF3b49	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Shao W (2012)	22064476	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1022618	2538936	3361572	275512	280648	SPCC10H11.01	SPSNRNA.06	prp11	snu6	prp5	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Shao W (2012)	22064476	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1022622	2542405	3361478	278869	280554	SPAC32A11.03c	SPAC13A11.06	phx1	SPAC13A11.06	-	SPAC3H8.01	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kim JY (2014)	25102102	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chronological lifespan:wild type	Figure 3|pdc202+ overexpression increases long-term viability of phx1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1022623	2542405	2543400	278869	279822	SPAC32A11.03c	SPAC3G9.11c	phx1	SPAC3G9.11c	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kim JY (2014)	25102102	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chronological lifespan:wild type	Figure 3|pdc201+ overexpression increases long-term viability of phx1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1022624	2541867	2542405	278357	278869	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC32A11.03c	sck2	phx1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kim JY (2014)	25102102	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chronological lifespan:wild type	Figure 5|phx1+ deletion reversed extended lifespan of sck2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1022625	2539781	2542405	276331	278869	SPBC106.10	SPAC32A11.03c	pka1	phx1	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kim JY (2014)	25102102	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chronological lifespan:wild type	Figure 5|phx1+ deletion reversed extended lifespan of pka1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1022626	2542677	2542405	279130	278869	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC32A11.03c	pyp1	phx1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kim JY (2014)	25102102	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chronological lifespan:wild type	Figure 5|phx1+ deletion reversed extended lifespan of pyp1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1022627	2539042	2541931	275615	278419	SPCC1183.05c	SPAC6G9.16c	lig4	SPAC6G9.16c	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Li J (2014)	24847916	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 5	-	BIOGRID
1022631	2543382	2539505	279804	276068	SPAC890.02c	SPCC736.14	alp7	dis1	mia1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tang NH (2014)	24937146	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
1022632	2543382	2540589	279804	277115	SPAC890.02c	SPBC20F10.06	alp7	mad2	mia1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tang NH (2014)	24937146	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
1022633	2543382	2541455	279804	277958	SPAC890.02c	SPAC6G9.06c	alp7	pcp1	mia1	-	Co-localization	physical	Tang NH (2014)	24937146	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1022634	2541455	2543382	277958	279804	SPAC6G9.06c	SPAC890.02c	pcp1	alp7	-	mia1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tang NH (2014)	24937146	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1022639	2540720	2542080	277243	278557	SPBC216.07c	SPAC27D7.03c	tor2	mei2	SPBC646.01c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Otsubo Y (2014)	24741065	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:wild type	mei2 mutation or overxpression modulates the effect of tor2-ts6 on mating efficency	-	BIOGRID
1022640	2540720	2542080	277243	278557	SPBC216.07c	SPAC27D7.03c	tor2	mei2	SPBC646.01c	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Otsubo Y (2014)	24741065	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1022641	2541030	2542080	277545	278557	SPBC337.08c	SPAC27D7.03c	ubi4	mei2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Otsubo Y (2014)	24741065	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency	likely ubiquitin conjugate	-	BIOGRID
1022663	2542703	2542703	279156	279156	SPAC26H5.06	SPAC26H5.06	pot1	pot1	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Dickey TH (2014)	25074378	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1022664	2542703	2542703	279156	279156	SPAC26H5.06	SPAC26H5.06	pot1	pot1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Dickey TH (2014)	25074378	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1022665	2539051	2541425	275624	277930	SPCC1183.11	SPAC2C4.17c	msy1	msy2	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	SPAC2C4.17c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nakayama Y (2014)	25041276	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vacuolar morphology	Vacuole integrity compromised in double mutant	-	BIOGRID
1022666	2539042	2541931	275615	278419	SPCC1183.05c	SPAC6G9.16c	lig4	SPAC6G9.16c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Li J (2014)	24847916	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 5	-	BIOGRID
1022667	2542070	2543580	278547	279995	SPAC29B12.02c	SPAC644.14c	set2	rad51	kmt3	rhp51	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pai CC (2014)	24909977	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 1|set2 rad51 double mutant has increased sensitivity to bleomycin	-	BIOGRID
1022668	2542513	2542502	278971	278960	SPAC1952.05	SPAC139.06	gcn5	hat1	kat2	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pai CC (2014)	24909977	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 3|double mutant has increased sensitivity to bleomycin	-	BIOGRID
1022669	2542513	2540077	278971	276615	SPAC1952.05	SPBC17D11.04c	gcn5	nto1	kat2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pai CC (2014)	24909977	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 3|double mutant has increased sensitivity to bleomycin	-	BIOGRID
1022670	2542513	2542157	278971	278633	SPAC1952.05	SPAC6F6.09	gcn5	eaf6	kat2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pai CC (2014)	24909977	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 3|double mutant has increased sensitivity to bleomycin	-	BIOGRID
1022671	2542513	2539989	278971	276533	SPAC1952.05	SPBC16A3.19	gcn5	eaf7	kat2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pai CC (2014)	24909977	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 3|double mutant has increased sensitivity to bleomycin	-	BIOGRID
1022672	2543273	2540472	279701	277000	SPAC1002.06c	SPBC2G2.12	bqt2	hrs1	mug18|rec23	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chikashige Y (2014)	24954111	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:wild type	Figure 4|hrs1+ deletion increases the frequency of bipolar spindles in bqt2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1022673	2543273	3361400	279701	280476	SPAC1002.06c	SPAC1093.06c	bqt2	dhc1	mug18|rec23	SPAC30C2.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chikashige Y (2014)	24954111	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:wild type	Figure 4|dhc1+ deletion increases the frequency of bipolar spindles in bqt2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1022674	2539352	2540601	275918	277127	SPCC188.07	SPBC29A3.14c	ccq1	trt1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Armstrong CA (2014)	25131669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1022675	2542414	2540601	278878	277127	SPAC6F6.16c	SPBC29A3.14c	tpz1	trt1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Armstrong CA (2014)	25131669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1022676	2540492	2540601	277020	277127	SPBC2D10.13	SPBC29A3.14c	est1	trt1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Armstrong CA (2014)	25131669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1022677	2542414	2539352	278878	275918	SPAC6F6.16c	SPCC188.07	tpz1	ccq1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Armstrong CA (2014)	25131669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1022678	2540492	2539352	277020	275918	SPBC2D10.13	SPCC188.07	est1	ccq1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Armstrong CA (2014)	25131669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1022679	2539352	2542414	275918	278878	SPCC188.07	SPAC6F6.16c	ccq1	tpz1	-	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Armstrong CA (2014)	25131669	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 3	-	BIOGRID
1022731	2540026	2541752	276570	278246	SPBC16D10.08c	SPAC23H4.06	hsp104	gln1	SPBC16D10.08c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Coelho M (2014)	24936793	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1022732	2540026	2542937	276570	279378	SPBC16D10.08c	SPAC10F6.03c	hsp104	cts1	SPBC16D10.08c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Coelho M (2014)	24936793	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1022733	2540020	3361391	276564	280467	SPBC16D10.09	SPAC13G6.01c	pcn1	rad8	pcn	SPAC5H10.14c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ding L (2014)	24875629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 4|sensitivity to HU and MMS	-	BIOGRID
1022734	3361391	2539473	280467	276036	SPAC13G6.01c	SPCP25A2.02c	rad8	rhp26	SPAC5H10.14c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ding L (2014)	24875629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Table S4|sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
1022735	3361391	2540244	280467	276776	SPAC13G6.01c	SPBC336.01	rad8	fbh1	SPAC5H10.14c	fdh|fdh1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ding L (2014)	24875629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Table S4|sensitivity to MMS, UV	-	BIOGRID
1022737	3361391	2542749	280467	279199	SPAC13G6.01c	SPAC15A10.03c	rad8	rad54	SPAC5H10.14c	rhp54	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ding L (2014)	24875629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Table S4|sensitivity to HU, MMS, UV, CPT	-	BIOGRID
1022738	3361391	2543685	280467	280099	SPAC13G6.01c	SPAC3C7.03c	rad8	rad55	SPAC5H10.14c	rhp55	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ding L (2014)	24875629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Table S4|sensitivity to HU, MMS, UV, CPT	-	BIOGRID
1022739	3361391	2542007	280467	278490	SPAC13G6.01c	SPAC20H4.07	rad8	rad57	SPAC5H10.14c	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ding L (2014)	24875629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Table S4|sensitivity to HU, MMS, UV, CPT	-	BIOGRID
1022740	3361391	2541213	280467	277727	SPAC13G6.01c	SPBC887.14c	rad8	pfh1	SPAC5H10.14c	pif1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ding L (2014)	24875629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Table S4|pfh1-R20|sensitivity to HU, MMS	-	BIOGRID
1022741	3361391	2540148	280467	276685	SPAC13G6.01c	SPBC16D10.04c	rad8	dna2	SPAC5H10.14c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ding L (2014)	24875629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 7|Table S4|sensitivity to HU, MMS|sensitivity to HU, MMS, UV	-	BIOGRID
1022742	3361391	2543668	280467	280082	SPAC13G6.01c	SPAC9.05	rad8	fml1	SPAC5H10.14c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ding L (2014)	24875629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Table S4|sensitivity to HU, MMS, UV, CPT	-	BIOGRID
1022743	3361391	2542014	280467	278497	SPAC13G6.01c	SPAC20H4.04	rad8	fml2	SPAC5H10.14c	mfh2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ding L (2014)	24875629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Table S4|sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
1022744	3361391	2543580	280467	279995	SPAC13G6.01c	SPAC644.14c	rad8	rad51	SPAC5H10.14c	rhp51	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ding L (2014)	24875629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 6|sensitivity to HU, MMS	-	BIOGRID
1022745	3361391	2543118	280467	279550	SPAC13G6.01c	SPAC3G6.11	rad8	chl1	SPAC5H10.14c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ding L (2014)	24875629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Table S4|sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
1022746	3361391	2543118	280467	279550	SPAC13G6.01c	SPAC3G6.11	rad8	chl1	SPAC5H10.14c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ding L (2014)	24875629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Table S4|sensitivity to CPT	-	BIOGRID
1022747	2543577	3361391	279992	280467	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC13G6.01c	srs2	rad8	-	SPAC5H10.14c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ding L (2014)	24875629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Figure 6|sensitivity to HU	-	BIOGRID
1022748	3361391	2543577	280467	279992	SPAC13G6.01c	SPAC4H3.05	rad8	srs2	SPAC5H10.14c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ding L (2014)	24875629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Table S4|sensitivity to MMS, CPT	-	BIOGRID
1022749	2543668	3361391	280082	280467	SPAC9.05	SPAC13G6.01c	fml1	rad8	-	SPAC5H10.14c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ding L (2014)	24875629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Figure S5|fml1 fml2 double deletion rescues sensitivity to CPT of rad8 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1022750	2542014	3361391	278497	280467	SPAC20H4.04	SPAC13G6.01c	fml2	rad8	mfh2	SPAC5H10.14c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ding L (2014)	24875629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Figure S5|fml1 fml2 double deletion rescues sensitivity to CPT of rad8 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1022751	3361391	2541213	280467	277727	SPAC13G6.01c	SPBC887.14c	rad8	pfh1	SPAC5H10.14c	pif1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ding L (2014)	24875629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Table S4|pfh1-R20|sensitivity to HU	-	BIOGRID
1022754	3361391	2539004	280467	275578	SPAC13G6.01c	SPCC4G3.05c	rad8	mus81	SPAC5H10.14c	slx3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ding L (2014)	24875629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 6|sensitivity to HU, MMS	-	BIOGRID
1022755	3361391	2541620	280467	278117	SPAC13G6.01c	SPAC2G11.12	rad8	rqh1	SPAC5H10.14c	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ding L (2014)	24875629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Table S4|sensitivity to HU, MMS, UV	-	BIOGRID
1022756	3361391	2540348	280467	276877	SPAC13G6.01c	SPBC29A10.05	rad8	exo1	SPAC5H10.14c	mut2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ding L (2014)	24875629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 7|sensitivity to HU	-	BIOGRID
1022757	3361391	2542757	280467	279207	SPAC13G6.01c	SPAC13C5.07	rad8	mre11	SPAC5H10.14c	rad32	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ding L (2014)	24875629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 7|sensitivity to HU	-	BIOGRID
1022758	3361391	2541158	280467	277673	SPAC13G6.01c	SPBC660.13c	rad8	ssb1	SPAC5H10.14c	rad11|rpa1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ding L (2014)	24875629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 7|sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
1022759	2541158	3361391	277673	280467	SPBC660.13c	SPAC13G6.01c	ssb1	rad8	rad11|rpa1	SPAC5H10.14c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ding L (2014)	24875629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Figure 7|sensitivity to HU	-	BIOGRID
1022760	3361391	2538959	280467	275533	SPAC13G6.01c	SPCC18B5.11c	rad8	cds1	SPAC5H10.14c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ding L (2014)	24875629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 8|sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
1022761	2538959	3361391	275533	280467	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC13G6.01c	cds1	rad8	-	SPAC5H10.14c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ding L (2014)	24875629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Figure 8|sensitivity to HU, CPT	-	BIOGRID
1022762	3361391	2540728	280467	277251	SPAC13G6.01c	SPBC216.06c	rad8	swi1	SPAC5H10.14c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ding L (2014)	24875629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 8|sensitivity to MMS, UV	-	BIOGRID
1022763	3361391	3361323	280467	280399	SPAC13G6.01c	SPBC30D10.04	rad8	swi3	SPAC5H10.14c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ding L (2014)	24875629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 8|sensitivity to MMS, UV	-	BIOGRID
1022764	3361391	2543240	280467	279668	SPAC13G6.01c	SPAC694.06c	rad8	mrc1	SPAC5H10.14c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ding L (2014)	24875629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 8|sensitivity to MMS, UV	-	BIOGRID
1022765	2540020	2540728	276564	277251	SPBC16D10.09	SPBC216.06c	pcn1	swi1	pcn	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ding L (2014)	24875629	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 8|sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
1022956	2538769	2538868	275352	275448	SPCC126.04c	SPCC132.02	sgf73	hst2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022957	2538769	2540436	275352	276964	SPCC126.04c	SPBC28F2.10c	sgf73	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022958	2538769	2540601	275352	277127	SPCC126.04c	SPBC29A3.14c	sgf73	trt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022959	2538769	2542808	275352	279256	SPCC126.04c	SPAC15E1.07c	sgf73	moa1	-	mug159	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022960	2538769	2542972	275352	279411	SPCC126.04c	SPAPYUG7.02c	sgf73	sin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022961	2538769	2540219	275352	276752	SPCC126.04c	SPBC31F10.13c	sgf73	hip1	-	hir1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022962	2538769	3361420	275352	280496	SPCC126.04c	SPAPB17E12.04c	sgf73	csn2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022963	2538769	2540792	275352	277311	SPCC126.04c	SPBC4F6.06	sgf73	kin1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022964	2538769	2541015	275352	277530	SPCC126.04c	SPBC409.08	sgf73	SPBC409.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022965	2538769	2543159	275352	279590	SPCC126.04c	SPAC3C7.09	sgf73	set8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022966	2538769	2542086	275352	278563	SPCC126.04c	SPAC25H1.02	sgf73	jmj1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022967	2538769	2542677	275352	279130	SPCC126.04c	SPAC26F1.10c	sgf73	pyp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022968	2538769	2541804	275352	278295	SPCC126.04c	SPAC29A4.18	sgf73	prw1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022969	2538769	2542027	275352	278509	SPCC126.04c	SPAC23C11.08	sgf73	php3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022970	2538769	2542055	275352	278534	SPCC126.04c	SPAC6G9.03c	sgf73	mug183	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022971	2538769	2541776	275352	278270	SPCC126.04c	SPAC23H3.05c	sgf73	swd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022972	2538769	2543396	275352	279818	SPCC126.04c	SPAC4D7.11	sgf73	dsc4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022973	2538769	2539823	275352	276373	SPCC126.04c	SPBC16A3.18	sgf73	cip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022974	2538769	2539237	275352	275807	SPCC126.04c	SPCC24B10.13	sgf73	skb5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022975	2538769	2541990	275352	278474	SPCC126.04c	SPAC20H4.02	sgf73	dsc3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022976	2538769	2543008	275352	279446	SPCC126.04c	SPAC12B10.13	sgf73	SPAC12B10.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022977	2538769	2542052	275352	278531	SPCC126.04c	SPAC823.15	sgf73	ppa1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022978	2538769	2539592	275352	276150	SPCC126.04c	SPCC794.12c	sgf73	mae2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022979	2538769	2540159	275352	276694	SPCC126.04c	SPBC12C2.08	sgf73	dnm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022980	2538769	2542502	275352	278960	SPCC126.04c	SPAC139.06	sgf73	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022981	2538769	2540115	275352	276652	SPCC126.04c	SPBC1778.02	sgf73	rap1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022982	2538769	2540309	275352	276839	SPCC126.04c	SPBC21B10.13c	sgf73	yox1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022983	2538769	2539922	275352	276466	SPCC126.04c	SPBC1773.11c	sgf73	mug89	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022984	2538769	2539667	275352	276222	SPCC126.04c	SPBC13G1.08c	sgf73	ash2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022985	2538769	2539675	275352	276230	SPCC126.04c	SPBC1718.03	sgf73	ker1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022986	2538769	2541708	275352	278203	SPCC126.04c	SPAC31A2.02	sgf73	trm112	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022987	2538769	2541677	275352	278173	SPCC126.04c	SPAC1565.04c	sgf73	ste4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022988	2538769	2542081	275352	278558	SPCC126.04c	SPAC26H5.04	sgf73	SPAC26H5.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022989	2538769	2539700	275352	276253	SPCC126.04c	SPBC1685.15c	sgf73	klp6	-	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022990	2538769	2542060	275352	278538	SPCC126.04c	SPAC23C11.14	sgf73	zhf1	-	zhf	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022991	2538769	2540764	275352	277284	SPCC126.04c	SPBC19C7.02	sgf73	ubr1	-	SPBC32F12.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022992	2538769	2542622	275352	279076	SPCC126.04c	SPAC18B11.07c	sgf73	rhp6	-	sng1|ubc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022993	2538769	3361511	275352	280587	SPCC126.04c	SPAC23C4.08	sgf73	rho3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022994	2538769	2540645	275352	277170	SPCC126.04c	SPBC21B10.05c	sgf73	pop3	-	wat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022995	2538769	2543517	275352	279935	SPCC126.04c	SPAC3G9.05	sgf73	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022996	2538769	2541061	275352	277576	SPCC126.04c	SPBC83.09c	sgf73	lin1	-	SPBC83.09c|snu40	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022997	2538769	2540863	275352	277380	SPCC126.04c	SPBC56F2.03	sgf73	SPBC56F2.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022998	2538769	2542756	275352	279206	SPCC126.04c	SPAC15A10.16	sgf73	bud6	-	SPAC15E1.01|aip3|fat1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1022999	2538769	2538775	275352	275357	SPCC126.04c	SPCC23B6.05c	sgf73	ssb3	-	rpa3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023000	2538769	2542029	275352	278511	SPCC126.04c	SPAC8E11.02c	sgf73	rad24	-	anr5|sam4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023001	2538769	2542878	275352	279323	SPCC126.04c	SPAC57A10.09c	sgf73	nhp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023002	2538769	2542683	275352	279136	SPCC126.04c	SPAPYUG7.03c	sgf73	mid2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023003	2538769	2542318	275352	278784	SPCC126.04c	SPAC16C9.05	sgf73	cph1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023004	2538769	2541520	275352	278021	SPCC126.04c	SPAC2E1P5.03	sgf73	SPAC2E1P5.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023005	2538769	2539330	275352	275896	SPCC126.04c	SPCC1753.03c	sgf73	rec7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023006	2538769	2542195	275352	278670	SPCC126.04c	SPAC1834.07	sgf73	klp3	-	krp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023007	2538769	2542513	275352	278971	SPCC126.04c	SPAC1952.05	sgf73	gcn5	-	kat2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023008	2538769	2539079	275352	275651	SPCC126.04c	SPCC1223.01	sgf73	SPCC1223.01	-	SPCC285.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023009	2538769	2543619	275352	280033	SPCC126.04c	SPAC4F10.04	sgf73	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023010	2538769	2538700	275352	275285	SPCC126.04c	SPCC645.13	sgf73	SPCC645.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023011	2538769	2543346	275352	279768	SPCC126.04c	SPAC688.14	sgf73	set13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023012	2538769	2542418	275352	278881	SPCC126.04c	SPAC1805.07c	sgf73	dad2	-	hos2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023013	2538769	2543327	275352	279750	SPCC126.04c	SPAC1D4.06c	sgf73	csk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023014	2538769	2542378	275352	278842	SPCC126.04c	SPAC1805.04	sgf73	nup132	-	Nup133b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023015	2538769	2541585	275352	278082	SPCC126.04c	SPAC14C4.05c	sgf73	man1	-	heh2|mug61	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023016	2538769	2540451	275352	276979	SPCC126.04c	SPBC2G2.17c	sgf73	SPBC2G2.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023017	2538769	2540161	275352	276696	SPCC126.04c	SPBC13E7.03c	sgf73	SPBC13E7.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023018	2538769	2541147	275352	277662	SPCC126.04c	SPBC651.05c	sgf73	dot2	-	vps22	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023019	2538769	2539525	275352	276087	SPCC126.04c	SPCC613.01	sgf73	SPCC613.01	-	SPCC757.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023020	2538769	2538959	275352	275533	SPCC126.04c	SPCC18B5.11c	sgf73	cds1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023021	2538769	2540686	275352	277211	SPCC126.04c	SPBC21D10.10	sgf73	bdc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023022	2538769	2541395	275352	277904	SPCC126.04c	SPBP8B7.25	sgf73	cyp4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023023	2538769	2543560	275352	279976	SPCC126.04c	SPAC664.03	sgf73	paf1	-	SPAC664.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023024	2538769	2543044	275352	279479	SPCC126.04c	SPAC3C7.12	sgf73	tip1	-	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023025	2538769	2542967	275352	279407	SPCC126.04c	SPAC12B10.12c	sgf73	rhp41	-	rhp4a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023026	2538769	2542175	275352	278650	SPCC126.04c	SPAC1F3.02c	sgf73	mkh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023027	2538769	2543580	275352	279995	SPCC126.04c	SPAC644.14c	sgf73	rad51	-	rhp51	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023028	2538769	2540373	275352	276902	SPCC126.04c	SPBC2G2.05	sgf73	rpl1603	-	rpl16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023029	2538769	2541786	275352	278278	SPCC126.04c	SPAC22F3.08c	sgf73	rok1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023030	2538769	2541556	275352	278055	SPCC126.04c	SPAC6G9.10c	sgf73	sen1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023031	2538769	2541117	275352	277632	SPCC126.04c	SPBC646.13	sgf73	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023032	2538769	2540612	275352	277138	SPCC126.04c	SPBC1D7.05	sgf73	byr2	-	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023033	2538769	2539812	275352	276362	SPCC126.04c	SPBC1347.02	sgf73	fkbp39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023034	2538769	2541479	275352	277981	SPCC126.04c	SPAC27F1.06c	sgf73	SPAC27F1.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023035	2538769	2541463	275352	277965	SPCC126.04c	SPAC2F3.02	sgf73	SPAC2F3.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023036	2538769	2540523	275352	277051	SPCC126.04c	SPBC29A10.10c	sgf73	dbl8	-	SPBC29A10.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023037	2538769	2543190	275352	279619	SPCC126.04c	SPAC31F12.01	sgf73	zds1	-	SPAC637.14|mug88	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023038	2538769	2542014	275352	278497	SPCC126.04c	SPAC20H4.04	sgf73	fml2	-	mfh2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023039	2538769	2539438	275352	276001	SPCC126.04c	SPCC4B3.07	sgf73	nro1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023040	2538769	2542667	275352	279120	SPCC126.04c	SPAC26A3.16	sgf73	dph1	-	ucp5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023041	2538769	2541118	275352	277633	SPCC126.04c	SPBC713.08	sgf73	mim1	-	tom13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023042	2538769	2541287	275352	277800	SPCC126.04c	SPBP22H7.05c	sgf73	abo2	-	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023043	2538769	2540995	275352	277511	SPCC126.04c	SPBC337.16	sgf73	cho1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023044	2538769	2541498	275352	278000	SPCC126.04c	SPAC227.10	sgf73	SPAC227.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023045	2538769	2541251	275352	277765	SPCC126.04c	SPBC947.10	sgf73	dsc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023046	2538769	2543240	275352	279668	SPCC126.04c	SPAC694.06c	sgf73	mrc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023047	2538769	2540409	275352	276937	SPCC126.04c	SPBC2D10.11c	sgf73	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023048	2538769	2542285	275352	278753	SPCC126.04c	SPAC17H9.09c	sgf73	ras1	-	ste5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023049	2538769	2539857	275352	276404	SPCC126.04c	SPBC1604.20c	sgf73	tea2	-	klp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023050	2538769	2542059	275352	278537	SPCC126.04c	SPAC328.06	sgf73	ubp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023051	2538769	2542550	275352	279007	SPCC126.04c	SPAC1B3.02c	sgf73	SPAC1B3.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023052	2538769	2538926	275352	275502	SPCC126.04c	SPCC306.07c	sgf73	SPCC306.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023053	2538769	2541361	275352	277872	SPCC126.04c	SPBP8B7.10c	sgf73	utp16	-	SPBP8B7.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023054	2538769	2541496	275352	277998	SPCC126.04c	SPAC23D3.09	sgf73	arp42	-	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023055	2538769	2541181	275352	277695	SPCC126.04c	SPBC713.05	sgf73	SPBC713.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023056	2538769	2542298	275352	278765	SPCC126.04c	SPAC29A4.02c	sgf73	SPAC29A4.02c	-	tef3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023057	2538769	2539545	275352	276106	SPCC126.04c	SPCC4B3.12	sgf73	set9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023058	2538769	2540327	275352	276857	SPCC126.04c	SPBC31F10.07	sgf73	lsb5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023059	2538769	2540100	275352	276638	SPCC126.04c	SPBC13E7.09	sgf73	vrp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023060	2538769	2542338	275352	278804	SPCC126.04c	SPAC16E8.01	sgf73	shd1	-	sla1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023061	2538769	2540413	275352	276941	SPCC126.04c	SPBC19F8.01c	sgf73	spn7	-	SPBC21.08c|mde8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023062	2538769	2539023	275352	275596	SPCC126.04c	SPCC594.05c	sgf73	spf1	-	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023063	2538769	2540551	275352	277078	SPCC126.04c	SPBC23E6.01c	sgf73	cxr1	-	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023064	2538769	2540913	275352	277429	SPCC126.04c	SPBC56F2.08c	sgf73	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023065	2538769	3361342	275352	280418	SPCC126.04c	SPBC16D10.07c	sgf73	sir2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023066	2538769	2541140	275352	277655	SPCC126.04c	SPBC713.07c	sgf73	SPBC713.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023067	2538769	2542145	275352	278621	SPCC126.04c	SPAC17C9.09c	sgf73	tim13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023068	2538769	2539473	275352	276036	SPCC126.04c	SPCP25A2.02c	sgf73	rhp26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023069	2538769	2542176	275352	278651	SPCC126.04c	SPAC13C5.02	sgf73	dre4	-	hgp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023070	2538769	2542498	275352	278957	SPCC126.04c	SPACUNK4.16c	sgf73	SPACUNK4.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023071	2538769	2541801	275352	278292	SPCC126.04c	SPAC2F7.08c	sgf73	snf5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023072	2538769	3361532	275352	280608	SPCC126.04c	SPAC1D4.11c	sgf73	lkh1	-	kic1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023073	2538769	2541109	275352	277624	SPCC126.04c	SPBC6B1.02	sgf73	ppk30	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023074	2538769	2540019	275352	276563	SPCC126.04c	SPBC1685.01	sgf73	pmp1	-	dsp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023075	2538769	2539818	275352	276368	SPCC126.04c	SPBC11C11.08	sgf73	srp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023076	2538769	3361429	275352	280505	SPCC126.04c	SPAPB18E9.01	sgf73	trm5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023077	2538769	2539463	275352	276026	SPCC126.04c	SPCC550.11	sgf73	SPCC550.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023078	2538769	2543339	275352	279762	SPCC126.04c	SPAC630.13c	sgf73	tsc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023079	2538769	2542123	275352	278599	SPCC126.04c	SPAC18G6.15	sgf73	mal3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023080	2538769	2541468	275352	277970	SPCC126.04c	SPAC1F5.09c	sgf73	shk2	-	pak2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023081	2538769	2539424	275352	275989	SPCC126.04c	SPCC622.19	sgf73	jmj4	-	mug149	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023082	2538769	2540272	275352	276803	SPCC126.04c	SPBC31F10.09c	sgf73	nut2	-	med10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023083	2538769	2540661	275352	277186	SPCC126.04c	SPBC23E6.03c	sgf73	nta1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023084	2538769	2540589	275352	277115	SPCC126.04c	SPBC20F10.06	sgf73	mad2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023085	2538769	2540800	275352	277319	SPCC126.04c	SPBC409.20c	sgf73	psh3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023086	2538769	2539154	275352	275726	SPCC126.04c	SPCC11E10.07c	sgf73	SPCC11E10.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023087	2538769	2541929	275352	278417	SPCC126.04c	SPAC23C4.12	sgf73	hhp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023088	2538769	2539488	275352	276051	SPCC126.04c	SPCC645.08c	sgf73	snd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023089	2538769	2541846	275352	278337	SPCC126.04c	SPAC20G4.01	sgf73	caf16	-	SPAC22F8.13	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023090	2538769	2541900	275352	278390	SPCC126.04c	SPAC23H4.17c	sgf73	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023091	2538769	2540646	275352	277171	SPCC126.04c	SPBC23G7.11	sgf73	mag2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023092	2538769	2540462	275352	276990	SPCC126.04c	SPBC29A3.07c	sgf73	sap14	-	sab14|SF3b14a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023093	2538769	2539560	275352	276121	SPCC126.04c	SPCC736.08	sgf73	cbf11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023094	2538769	2542069	275352	278546	SPCC126.04c	SPAC27D7.13c	sgf73	ssm4	-	SPAC637.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023095	2538769	2542831	275352	279278	SPCC126.04c	SPAC20H4.08	sgf73	whi2	-	SPAC20H4.08|SPAC145.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023096	2538769	2541358	275352	277869	SPCC126.04c	SPBP4H10.16c	sgf73	SPBP4H10.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023097	2538769	2541013	275352	277528	SPCC126.04c	SPBC3H7.13	sgf73	far10	-	SPBC3H7.13|csc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023098	2538769	2538770	275352	275353	SPCC126.04c	SPCC1753.02c	sgf73	git3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023099	2538769	2543153	275352	279585	SPCC126.04c	SPAC821.05	sgf73	SPAC821.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023100	2538769	2540118	275352	276655	SPCC126.04c	SPBC16E9.17c	sgf73	rem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023101	2538769	2540099	275352	276637	SPCC126.04c	SPBC16H5.11c	sgf73	skb1	-	rmt5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023102	2538769	2542933	275352	279374	SPCC126.04c	SPAPYUG7.06	sgf73	sdu1	-	mug67|hag1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023103	2538769	3361385	275352	280461	SPCC126.04c	SPAC1639.02c	sgf73	trk2	-	SPAC1F5.12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023104	2538769	2543214	275352	279643	SPCC126.04c	SPAC6F12.06	sgf73	SPAC6F12.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023105	2538769	2543160	275352	279591	SPCC126.04c	SPAC31A2.14	sgf73	bun107	-	wdr48	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023106	2538769	2542894	275352	279338	SPCC126.04c	SPAC144.17c	sgf73	SPAC144.17c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023107	2538769	2543036	275352	279471	SPCC126.04c	SPAC3A12.03c	sgf73	meu34	-	mug145	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023108	2538769	2542072	275352	278549	SPCC126.04c	SPAP32A8.03c	sgf73	bop1	-	SPAP32A8.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023109	2538769	2542474	275352	278934	SPCC126.04c	SPAC31G5.09c	sgf73	spk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023110	2538769	2539482	275352	276045	SPCC126.04c	SPCC417.06c	sgf73	mug27	-	ppk35|slk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023111	2538769	2540967	275352	277483	SPCC126.04c	SPBC36B7.08c	sgf73	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023112	2538769	2540322	275352	276852	SPCC126.04c	SPBC31F10.10c	sgf73	SPBC31F10.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023113	2538769	2542013	275352	278496	SPCC126.04c	SPAC20H4.11c	sgf73	rho5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023114	2538769	2540008	275352	276552	SPCC126.04c	SPBC12D12.02c	sgf73	cdm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023115	2538769	2539604	275352	276162	SPCC126.04c	SPBC1105.14	sgf73	rsv2	-	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023116	2538769	2542938	275352	279379	SPCC126.04c	SPAC6B12.08	sgf73	mug185	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023117	2538769	2540966	275352	277482	SPCC126.04c	SPBC3D6.09	sgf73	dpb4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023118	2538769	2540765	275352	277285	SPCC126.04c	SPBC1D7.01	sgf73	pfd1	-	SPBC1D7.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023119	2538769	2539073	275352	275645	SPCC126.04c	SPCC1322.02	sgf73	pxd1	-	SPCC1322.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023120	2538769	2543331	275352	279754	SPCC126.04c	SPAC56E4.07	sgf73	SPAC56E4.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023121	2538769	2540568	275352	277095	SPCC126.04c	SPBC28F2.08c	sgf73	SPBC28F2.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023122	2538769	2540341	275352	276870	SPCC126.04c	SPBC2F12.11c	sgf73	rep2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023123	2538769	2541552	275352	278051	SPCC126.04c	SPAC1142.08	sgf73	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023124	2538769	2540749	275352	277271	SPCC126.04c	SPBC4B4.03	sgf73	rsc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023125	2538769	2541270	275352	277784	SPCC126.04c	SPBC902.02c	sgf73	ctf18	-	chl12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023126	2538769	2542886	275352	279331	SPCC126.04c	SPAC1486.01	sgf73	SPAC1486.01	-	sod2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023127	2538769	2542812	275352	279259	SPCC126.04c	SPAC6F6.01	sgf73	cch1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023128	2538769	2541336	275352	277847	SPCC126.04c	SPBP35G2.10	sgf73	mit1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023129	2538769	2540241	275352	276773	SPCC126.04c	SPBC32H8.11	sgf73	mei4	-	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023130	2538769	2543598	275352	280013	SPCC126.04c	SPAC4G9.14	sgf73	SPAC4G9.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023131	2538769	2543434	275352	279854	SPCC126.04c	SPAC8F11.02c	sgf73	dph3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023132	2538769	2543324	275352	279747	SPCC126.04c	SPAPJ696.01c	sgf73	vps17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023133	2538769	2541166	275352	277681	SPCC126.04c	SPBC725.15	sgf73	ura5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023134	2538769	2542036	275352	278518	SPCC126.04c	SPAC23A1.19c	sgf73	hrq1	-	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023135	2538769	3361456	275352	280532	SPCC126.04c	SPAC1142.03c	sgf73	swi2	-	SPAC17G6.20c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023136	2538769	2540930	275352	277446	SPCC126.04c	SPBC354.10	sgf73	def1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023137	2538769	2542395	275352	278859	SPCC126.04c	SPAC1805.05	sgf73	cki3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023138	2538769	2540437	275352	276965	SPCC126.04c	SPBC25B2.07c	sgf73	mmb1	-	mug164	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023139	2538769	2539420	275352	275985	SPCC126.04c	SPCC970.07c	sgf73	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023140	2538769	3361561	275352	280637	SPCC126.04c	SPAC11E3.01c	sgf73	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023141	2538769	2539014	275352	275587	SPCC126.04c	SPCC18B5.05c	sgf73	SPCC18B5.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023142	2538769	3361146	275352	280222	SPCC126.04c	SPCC1919.01	sgf73	ckk2	-	ppk34|SPCC830.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023143	2538769	2539050	275352	275623	SPCC126.04c	SPCC11E10.08	sgf73	rik1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023144	2538769	2543658	275352	280072	SPCC126.04c	SPAC644.09	sgf73	SPAC644.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023145	2538769	2542192	275352	278667	SPCC126.04c	SPAC9G1.12	sgf73	cpd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023146	2538769	2542102	275352	278578	SPCC126.04c	SPAC8C9.17c	sgf73	spc34	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023147	2538769	2539804	275352	276354	SPCC126.04c	SPBC1105.11c	sgf73	hht3	-	h3.3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023148	2538769	2541411	275352	277919	SPCC126.04c	SPBPB2B2.12c	sgf73	gal10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023149	2538769	2541798	275352	278289	SPCC126.04c	SPAC22F3.03c	sgf73	rdh54	-	mug34|tid1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023150	2538769	2542300	275352	278767	SPCC126.04c	SPAC1687.22c	sgf73	puf3	-	SPAC222.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023151	2538769	2542289	275352	278757	SPCC126.04c	SPAC17G6.03	sgf73	SPAC17G6.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023152	2538769	2540342	275352	276871	SPCC126.04c	SPBC2G2.01c	sgf73	liz1	-	SPBC4B4.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023153	2538769	2543616	275352	280030	SPCC126.04c	SPAC4A8.09c	sgf73	cwf21	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023154	2538769	3361401	275352	280477	SPCC126.04c	SPAC1093.03	sgf73	SPAC1093.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023155	2538769	2542733	275352	279183	SPCC126.04c	SPAC6F12.04	sgf73	SPAC6F12.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023156	2538769	2542789	275352	279238	SPCC126.04c	SPAC15E1.03	sgf73	rpl42	-	rpl36a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023157	2538769	2540825	275352	277343	SPCC126.04c	SPBC428.08c	sgf73	clr4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Guo Y (2014)	25076038	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	validated by low throughput assay.	-	BIOGRID
1023158	2539869	2541936	276415	278423	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC222.10c	cdc2	byr4	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Rachfall N (2014)	24920823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023161	2541936	2540845	278423	277362	SPAC222.10c	SPBC428.13c	byr4	mob1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Rachfall N (2014)	24920823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	byr4 null mutants are viable only in a mob1-R4 background	-	BIOGRID
1023162	2541936	2540660	278423	277185	SPAC222.10c	SPBC21.06c	byr4	cdc7	-	its10|pld1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Rachfall N (2014)	24920823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to high temperatures	-	BIOGRID
1023163	2541936	2539149	278423	275721	SPAC222.10c	SPCC1739.11c	byr4	cdc11	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Rachfall N (2014)	24920823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to high temperatures	-	BIOGRID
1023164	2541936	2542761	278423	279211	SPAC222.10c	SPAC1565.06c	byr4	spg1	-	sid3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Rachfall N (2014)	24920823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to high temperatures	-	BIOGRID
1023166	2541936	2541957	278423	278444	SPAC222.10c	SPAC23C11.16	byr4	plo1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Rachfall N (2014)	24920823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to high temperatures	-	BIOGRID
1023331	2539420	2543116	275985	279548	SPCC970.07c	SPAC3A11.08	raf2	pcu4	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Cul-4|cul4	Two-hybrid	physical	White SA (2014)	25090107	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 5	-	BIOGRID
1023332	2540911	2538907	277427	275484	SPBC651.10	SPCC24B10.19c	nse5	nts1	-	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Figure 1|nts1+ overexpression rescues sensitivity to CPT, hydroxyurea, UV in nse5 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1023333	2541512	2538907	278013	275484	SPAC11E3.08c	SPCC24B10.19c	nse6	nts1	-	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Figure 1|nts1+ overexpression rescues sensitivity to CPT, hydroxyurea, UV in nse6 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1023334	2538907	2541697	275484	278193	SPCC24B10.19c	SPAC25B8.02	nts1	sds3	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023335	2538907	2541804	275484	278295	SPCC24B10.19c	SPAC29A4.18	nts1	prw1	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023336	2538907	2540368	275484	276897	SPCC24B10.19c	SPBC36.05c	nts1	clr6	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023337	2538907	2541995	275484	278479	SPCC24B10.19c	SPAC5D6.02c	nts1	mug165	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023338	2538907	2542335	275484	278801	SPCC24B10.19c	SPAC16E8.12c	nts1	png3	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	SPAC16E8.12c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023339	2538907	2540018	275484	276562	SPCC24B10.19c	SPBC12C2.10c	nts1	pst1	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	SPBC21D10.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023340	2538907	2539793	275484	276343	SPCC24B10.19c	SPBC1734.16c	nts1	pst3	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023341	2538907	2539703	275484	276256	SPCC24B10.19c	SPBC16G5.15c	nts1	fkh2	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023342	2538907	2539374	275484	275940	SPCC24B10.19c	SPCC1259.07	nts1	rxt3	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023343	2538907	2538956	275484	275530	SPCC24B10.19c	SPCC1682.13	nts1	laf2	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023344	2538907	2540689	275484	277214	SPCC24B10.19c	SPBC428.06c	nts1	rxt2	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023345	2538907	2541650	275484	278146	SPCC24B10.19c	SPAC14C4.12c	nts1	laf1	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023346	2538907	2539523	275484	276085	SPCC24B10.19c	SPCC622.09	nts1	htb1	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023347	2538907	2542463	275484	278924	SPCC24B10.19c	SPAC1834.03c	nts1	hhf1	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	h4.1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023348	2538907	2541200	275484	277714	SPCC24B10.19c	SPBC8D2.03c	nts1	hhf2	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	ams3|h4.2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023349	2538907	2539991	275484	276535	SPCC24B10.19c	SPBC1105.12	nts1	hhf3	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	h4.3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023350	2538907	2542252	275484	278722	SPCC24B10.19c	SPAC17A2.13c	nts1	rad25	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023351	2538907	2542029	275484	278511	SPCC24B10.19c	SPAC8E11.02c	nts1	rad24	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	anr5|sam4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023352	2538907	2541087	275484	277602	SPCC24B10.19c	SPBC646.10c	nts1	SPBC646.10c	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023353	2538907	2540565	275484	277092	SPCC24B10.19c	SPBC1D7.04	nts1	mlo3	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023354	2538907	2540337	275484	276866	SPCC24B10.19c	SPBC28F2.11	nts1	hmo1	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	SPBC28F2.11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023355	2538907	2543227	275484	279655	SPCC24B10.19c	SPAPB8E5.09	nts1	rvb1	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023356	2538907	2539189	275484	275760	SPCC24B10.19c	SPCC1682.16	nts1	rpt4	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	SPCC306.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023357	2538907	2541062	275484	277577	SPCC24B10.19c	SPBC660.11	nts1	tcg1	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	mug187	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023358	2538907	2539539	275484	276101	SPCC24B10.19c	SPCC576.10c	nts1	rpt3	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023359	2538907	2538871	275484	275450	SPCC24B10.19c	SPCC1259.14c	nts1	meu27	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	B8647-6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023360	2538907	2540487	275484	277015	SPCC24B10.19c	SPBC23G7.12c	nts1	rpt6	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	let1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023361	2538907	2540173	275484	276706	SPCC24B10.19c	SPBC106.13	nts1	SPBC106.13	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023362	2538907	2541814	275484	278305	SPCC24B10.19c	SPAC23G3.06	nts1	SPAC23G3.06	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023363	2538907	3361462	275484	280538	SPCC24B10.19c	SPAC3A11.12c	nts1	rpt5	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	pam2|tbp1|SPAC3H5.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023364	2538907	2539743	275484	276295	SPCC24B10.19c	SPBC16A3.08c	nts1	oga1	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	SPBC16A3.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023365	2538907	2541419	275484	277925	SPCC24B10.19c	SPAC1F3.07c	nts1	rsc58	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023366	2538907	2540743	275484	277266	SPCC24B10.19c	SPBC215.06c	nts1	SPBC215.06c	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023367	2538907	2543298	275484	279723	SPCC24B10.19c	SPAC6B12.15	nts1	cpc2	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	rkp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023368	2538907	2539122	275484	275694	SPCC24B10.19c	SPCC14G10.03c	nts1	ump1	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023369	2538907	2541438	275484	277943	SPCC24B10.19c	SPAC23G3.10c	nts1	ssr3	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023370	2538907	2541077	275484	277592	SPCC24B10.19c	SPBC83.08	nts1	rvb2	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023371	2538907	2540960	275484	277476	SPCC24B10.19c	SPBC3D6.02	nts1	but2	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023372	2538907	2543040	275484	279475	SPCC24B10.19c	SPAC31G5.13	nts1	rpn11	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023373	2538907	2539899	275484	276445	SPCC24B10.19c	SPBC16D10.01c	nts1	SPBC16D10.01c	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	SPBC418.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023374	2538907	2540582	275484	277108	SPCC24B10.19c	SPBC26H8.07c	nts1	nda3	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	alp12|ben1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023375	2538907	2539999	275484	276543	SPCC24B10.19c	SPBC1734.15	nts1	rsc4	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	brd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023376	2538907	2541695	275484	278191	SPCC24B10.19c	SPAC1F7.05	nts1	cdc22	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023377	2538907	2542744	275484	279194	SPCC24B10.19c	SPAC1565.08	nts1	cdc48	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023378	2538907	2539499	275484	276062	SPCC24B10.19c	SPCC622.08c	nts1	hta1	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023379	2538907	2542226	275484	278699	SPCC24B10.19c	SPAC19G12.06c	nts1	hta2	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023380	2538907	2540936	275484	277452	SPCC24B10.19c	SPBC800.05c	nts1	atb2	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	alp2|ban5|tub1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023381	2538907	2539864	275484	276411	SPCC24B10.19c	SPBC16A3.15c	nts1	nda2	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1023382	2538907	2540368	275484	276897	SPCC24B10.19c	SPBC36.05c	nts1	clr6	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1023383	2538907	2541697	275484	278193	SPCC24B10.19c	SPAC25B8.02	nts1	sds3	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1023384	2541995	2540368	278479	276897	SPAC5D6.02c	SPBC36.05c	mug165	clr6	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1023385	2541995	2541697	278479	278193	SPAC5D6.02c	SPAC25B8.02	mug165	sds3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1023386	2542335	2540368	278801	276897	SPAC16E8.12c	SPBC36.05c	png3	clr6	SPAC16E8.12c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1023387	2542335	2541697	278801	278193	SPAC16E8.12c	SPAC25B8.02	png3	sds3	SPAC16E8.12c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1023388	2539703	2540368	276256	276897	SPBC16G5.15c	SPBC36.05c	fkh2	clr6	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1023389	2539703	2541697	276256	278193	SPBC16G5.15c	SPAC25B8.02	fkh2	sds3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1023390	2539703	2538907	276256	275484	SPBC16G5.15c	SPCC24B10.19c	fkh2	nts1	-	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1023391	2540368	2538907	276897	275484	SPBC36.05c	SPCC24B10.19c	clr6	nts1	-	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1023392	2540368	2541995	276897	278479	SPBC36.05c	SPAC5D6.02c	clr6	mug165	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1023393	2540368	2542335	276897	278801	SPBC36.05c	SPAC16E8.12c	clr6	png3	-	SPAC16E8.12c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1023394	2540368	2539703	276897	276256	SPBC36.05c	SPBC16G5.15c	clr6	fkh2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1023395	2540368	2539953	276897	276497	SPBC36.05c	SPBC1709.11c	clr6	png2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 3	-	BIOGRID
1023396	2540368	2541858	276897	278348	SPBC36.05c	SPAC23H4.12	clr6	alp13	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 3	-	BIOGRID
1023397	2541697	2541995	278193	278479	SPAC25B8.02	SPAC5D6.02c	sds3	mug165	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1023398	2541995	2542335	278479	278801	SPAC5D6.02c	SPAC16E8.12c	mug165	png3	-	SPAC16E8.12c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1023399	2538907	2541995	275484	278479	SPCC24B10.19c	SPAC5D6.02c	nts1	mug165	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1023400	2541697	2538907	278193	275484	SPAC25B8.02	SPCC24B10.19c	sds3	nts1	-	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1023401	2541697	2542335	278193	278801	SPAC25B8.02	SPAC16E8.12c	sds3	png3	-	SPAC16E8.12c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1023402	2541995	2538907	278479	275484	SPAC5D6.02c	SPCC24B10.19c	mug165	nts1	-	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1023403	2542335	2538907	278801	275484	SPAC16E8.12c	SPCC24B10.19c	png3	nts1	SPAC16E8.12c	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1023404	2542335	2541995	278801	278479	SPAC16E8.12c	SPAC5D6.02c	png3	mug165	SPAC16E8.12c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1023405	2538907	2542335	275484	278801	SPCC24B10.19c	SPAC16E8.12c	nts1	png3	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	SPAC16E8.12c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1023406	2538907	2539703	275484	276256	SPCC24B10.19c	SPBC16G5.15c	nts1	fkh2	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1023407	2541697	2539703	278193	276256	SPAC25B8.02	SPBC16G5.15c	sds3	fkh2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1023408	2541995	2539703	278479	276256	SPAC5D6.02c	SPBC16G5.15c	mug165	fkh2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1023409	2542335	2539703	278801	276256	SPAC16E8.12c	SPBC16G5.15c	png3	fkh2	SPAC16E8.12c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zilio N (2014)	25002536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1023410	2541247	2542632	277761	279086	SPBC947.12	SPAC24H6.05	kms2	cdc25	-	sal2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Waelde S (2014)	24963130	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	Figure 1|kns2 cdc25-22 double mutant has increased cell length	-	BIOGRID
1023411	2541247	2542632	277761	279086	SPBC947.12	SPAC24H6.05	kms2	cdc25	-	sal2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Waelde S (2014)	24963130	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	Figure 1|kns2 cdc25-22 double mutant is synthetic lethal at 34 degrees	-	BIOGRID
1023412	2541247	2541455	277761	277958	SPBC947.12	SPAC6G9.06c	kms2	pcp1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Waelde S (2014)	24963130	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 4|Table S1|identified by mass spec	-	BIOGRID
1023413	2541247	2541141	277761	277656	SPBC947.12	SPBC649.05	kms2	cut12	-	stf1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Waelde S (2014)	24963130	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 4|Table S1|identified by mass spec	-	BIOGRID
1023414	2541247	2541455	277761	277958	SPBC947.12	SPAC6G9.06c	kms2	pcp1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Waelde S (2014)	24963130	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	Figure 4|kms2 pcp1-18	-	BIOGRID
1023415	2541455	2543069	277958	279502	SPAC6G9.06c	SPAC3A11.05c	pcp1	kms1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Waelde S (2014)	24963130	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	Figure 4|kms1+ deletion rescues growth of pcp1-18	-	BIOGRID
1023416	2541247	2540582	277761	277108	SPBC947.12	SPBC26H8.07c	kms2	nda3	-	alp12|ben1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Waelde S (2014)	24963130	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Figure 4|kms2 nda3 KM311 double mutant is synthetic sick at 30 degrees	-	BIOGRID
1023417	2541247	2541957	277761	278444	SPBC947.12	SPAC23C11.16	kms2	plo1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Waelde S (2014)	24963130	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 8	-	BIOGRID
1023429	2540509	2539225	277037	275795	SPBC21H7.06c	SPCC1739.13	opi10	ssa2	SPBC21H7.06c|Hikeshi	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Oda Y (2014)	24768994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023430	2539817	2542845	276367	279291	SPBC146.03c	SPAC824.04	cut3	SPAC824.04	smc4	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:partial rescue|heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
1023431	2539817	2539414	276367	275979	SPBC146.03c	SPCC74.02c	cut3	ppn1	smc4	SPCC74.02c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
1023432	2539817	2543452	276367	279872	SPBC146.03c	SPAC3G9.04	cut3	ssu72	smc4	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth|vegetative growth:partial rescue	mild effect on growth	-	BIOGRID
1023433	2539817	3361384	276367	280460	SPBC146.03c	SPAC12G12.13c	cut3	cid14	smc4	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
1023434	2539817	2543619	276367	280033	SPBC146.03c	SPAC4F10.04	cut3	ypa1	smc4	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
1023435	2539817	2539218	276367	275788	SPBC146.03c	SPCC16C4.03	cut3	pin1	smc4	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
1023436	2539817	2541536	276367	278036	SPBC146.03c	SPAC1071.02	cut3	mms19	smc4	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
1023437	2539817	2541556	276367	278055	SPBC146.03c	SPAC6G9.10c	cut3	sen1	smc4	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
1023438	2539817	2540032	276367	276575	SPBC146.03c	SPBC1703.14c	cut3	top1	smc4	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
1023439	2539817	2541941	276367	278428	SPBC146.03c	SPAC20H4.03c	cut3	tfs1	smc4	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
1023440	2541319	2542845	277831	279291	SPBP4H10.06c	SPAC824.04	cut14	SPAC824.04	smc2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
1023443	2540246	2542845	276778	279291	SPBC336.07	SPAC824.04	sfc3	SPAC824.04	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
1023444	2543089	2542845	279522	279291	SPAC12G12.14c	SPAC824.04	pfs2	SPAC824.04	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
1023445	2541506	2543089	278008	279522	SPAC227.08c	SPAC12G12.14c	yth1	pfs2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023446	2541193	2539414	277707	275979	SPBC776.02c	SPCC74.02c	dis2	ppn1	bws1|sds1	SPCC74.02c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023447	2541193	2539414	277707	275979	SPBC776.02c	SPCC74.02c	dis2	ppn1	bws1|sds1	SPCC74.02c	Co-localization	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	ChIP	-	BIOGRID
1023448	2541193	2542845	277707	279291	SPBC776.02c	SPAC824.04	dis2	SPAC824.04	bws1|sds1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023449	2539414	2542845	275979	279291	SPCC74.02c	SPAC824.04	ppn1	SPAC824.04	SPCC74.02c	-	Co-localization	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	ChIP	-	BIOGRID
1023450	2542845	2543089	279291	279522	SPAC824.04	SPAC12G12.14c	SPAC824.04	pfs2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023451	2541506	2539694	278008	276248	SPAC227.08c	SPBC1709.08	yth1	cft1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023452	2541506	2539954	278008	276498	SPAC227.08c	SPBC1709.15c	yth1	cft2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023453	2541506	2541099	278008	277614	SPAC227.08c	SPBC646.04	yth1	pla1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023454	2541506	2543538	278008	279955	SPAC227.08c	SPAC1071.01c	yth1	pta1	-	SPAC4H3.15c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023455	2541506	2542258	278008	278727	SPAC227.08c	SPAC17G6.16c	yth1	ysh1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023456	2541506	2539414	278008	275979	SPAC227.08c	SPCC74.02c	yth1	ppn1	-	SPCC74.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023457	2541506	2543089	278008	279522	SPAC227.08c	SPAC12G12.14c	yth1	pfs2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023458	2541506	2541193	278008	277707	SPAC227.08c	SPBC776.02c	yth1	dis2	-	bws1|sds1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023459	2541506	2543452	278008	279872	SPAC227.08c	SPAC3G9.04	yth1	ssu72	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023460	2541506	2542845	278008	279291	SPAC227.08c	SPAC824.04	yth1	SPAC824.04	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023462	2541506	2542772	278008	279221	SPAC227.08c	SPAC16.02c	yth1	srp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023463	2541506	2541873	278008	278363	SPAC227.08c	SPAC22G7.10	yth1	iss1	-	SPAC22G7.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023464	2541506	2541018	278008	277533	SPAC227.08c	SPBC3B9.11c	yth1	ctf1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023465	2541506	2539818	278008	276368	SPAC227.08c	SPBC11C11.08	yth1	srp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023466	2541506	2541150	278008	277665	SPAC227.08c	SPBC660.15	yth1	SPBC660.15	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023467	2539179	2543131	275750	279563	SPCC31H12.05c	SPAC12G12.04	sds21	mcp60	-	hsp60	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023468	2539179	2543595	275750	280010	SPCC31H12.05c	SPAC4G9.11c	sds21	cmb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023469	2539179	2542189	275750	278664	SPCC31H12.05c	SPAC17A5.09c	sds21	glc9	-	SPAC17A5.09c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023470	2539179	2543597	275750	280012	SPCC31H12.05c	SPAC4A8.12c	sds21	sds22	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023471	2539179	2540709	275750	277232	SPCC31H12.05c	SPBC21D10.05c	sds21	ucp3	-	soc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023472	2539179	2542029	275750	278511	SPCC31H12.05c	SPAC8E11.02c	sds21	rad24	-	anr5|sam4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023473	2539179	2540908	275750	277424	SPCC31H12.05c	SPBC3B8.03	sds21	SPBC3B8.03	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023474	2539179	2539642	275750	276197	SPCC31H12.05c	SPBC1706.01	sds21	tea4	-	wsh3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023476	2539414	2539954	275979	276498	SPCC74.02c	SPBC1709.15c	ppn1	cft2	SPCC74.02c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023477	2539414	2539694	275979	276248	SPCC74.02c	SPBC1709.08	ppn1	cft1	SPCC74.02c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023478	2539414	2541099	275979	277614	SPCC74.02c	SPBC646.04	ppn1	pla1	SPCC74.02c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023479	2539414	2542258	275979	278727	SPCC74.02c	SPAC17G6.16c	ppn1	ysh1	SPCC74.02c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023480	2539414	2543538	275979	279955	SPCC74.02c	SPAC1071.01c	ppn1	pta1	SPCC74.02c	SPAC4H3.15c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023481	2539414	2541506	275979	278008	SPCC74.02c	SPAC227.08c	ppn1	yth1	SPCC74.02c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023482	2539414	2541193	275979	277707	SPCC74.02c	SPBC776.02c	ppn1	dis2	SPCC74.02c	bws1|sds1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023483	2539414	2543452	275979	279872	SPCC74.02c	SPAC3G9.04	ppn1	ssu72	SPCC74.02c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023484	2539414	2543089	275979	279522	SPCC74.02c	SPAC12G12.14c	ppn1	pfs2	SPCC74.02c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023485	2539414	2541018	275979	277533	SPCC74.02c	SPBC3B9.11c	ppn1	ctf1	SPCC74.02c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023486	2539414	2539818	275979	276368	SPCC74.02c	SPBC11C11.08	ppn1	srp1	SPCC74.02c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023487	2539414	2542845	275979	279291	SPCC74.02c	SPAC824.04	ppn1	SPAC824.04	SPCC74.02c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023488	2539414	2541873	275979	278363	SPCC74.02c	SPAC22G7.10	ppn1	iss1	SPCC74.02c	SPAC22G7.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023489	2539414	2541150	275979	277665	SPCC74.02c	SPBC660.15	ppn1	SPBC660.15	SPCC74.02c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023490	2539414	2542772	275979	279221	SPCC74.02c	SPAC16.02c	ppn1	srp2	SPCC74.02c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023491	2541193	2538840	277707	275421	SPBC776.02c	SPCC736.07c	dis2	SPCC736.07c	bws1|sds1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023492	2541193	2542189	277707	278664	SPBC776.02c	SPAC17A5.09c	dis2	glc9	bws1|sds1	SPAC17A5.09c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023493	2541193	2542577	277707	279033	SPBC776.02c	SPAC19G12.15c	dis2	tpp1	bws1|sds1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023494	2541193	2539414	277707	275979	SPBC776.02c	SPCC74.02c	dis2	ppn1	bws1|sds1	SPCC74.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023495	2541193	2541494	277707	277996	SPBC776.02c	SPAC227.15	dis2	SPAC227.15	bws1|sds1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023497	2541193	2539694	277707	276248	SPBC776.02c	SPBC1709.08	dis2	cft1	bws1|sds1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023498	2541193	2543597	277707	280012	SPBC776.02c	SPAC4A8.12c	dis2	sds22	bws1|sds1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023499	2541193	2541505	277707	278007	SPBC776.02c	SPAC57A7.04c	dis2	pabp	bws1|sds1	pab1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023500	2541193	2542845	277707	279291	SPBC776.02c	SPAC824.04	dis2	SPAC824.04	bws1|sds1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023501	2541193	2541099	277707	277614	SPBC776.02c	SPBC646.04	dis2	pla1	bws1|sds1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023502	2541193	2539954	277707	276498	SPBC776.02c	SPBC1709.15c	dis2	cft2	bws1|sds1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023503	2541193	2540709	277707	277232	SPBC776.02c	SPBC21D10.05c	dis2	ucp3	bws1|sds1	soc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023504	2541193	2543538	277707	279955	SPBC776.02c	SPAC1071.01c	dis2	pta1	bws1|sds1	SPAC4H3.15c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023505	2541193	2542029	277707	278511	SPBC776.02c	SPAC8E11.02c	dis2	rad24	bws1|sds1	anr5|sam4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023506	2541193	2540908	277707	277424	SPBC776.02c	SPBC3B8.03	dis2	SPBC3B8.03	bws1|sds1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023507	2541193	2542258	277707	278727	SPBC776.02c	SPAC17G6.16c	dis2	ysh1	bws1|sds1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023508	2541193	2543452	277707	279872	SPBC776.02c	SPAC3G9.04	dis2	ssu72	bws1|sds1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023509	2541193	2543089	277707	279522	SPBC776.02c	SPAC12G12.14c	dis2	pfs2	bws1|sds1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023510	2541193	2541873	277707	278363	SPBC776.02c	SPAC22G7.10	dis2	iss1	bws1|sds1	SPAC22G7.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023511	2541193	2542252	277707	278722	SPBC776.02c	SPAC17A2.13c	dis2	rad25	bws1|sds1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023512	2541193	2541506	277707	278008	SPBC776.02c	SPAC227.08c	dis2	yth1	bws1|sds1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023513	2541193	2539642	277707	276197	SPBC776.02c	SPBC1706.01	dis2	tea4	bws1|sds1	wsh3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023514	2541193	2541141	277707	277656	SPBC776.02c	SPBC649.05	dis2	cut12	bws1|sds1	stf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023515	2541193	2543302	277707	279727	SPBC776.02c	SPAC6B12.13	dis2	SPAC6B12.13	bws1|sds1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023516	2541193	2540292	277707	276823	SPBC776.02c	SPBC28F2.12	dis2	rpb1	bws1|sds1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023517	2541193	2540930	277707	277446	SPBC776.02c	SPBC354.10	dis2	def1	bws1|sds1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023518	2541193	2541150	277707	277665	SPBC776.02c	SPBC660.15	dis2	SPBC660.15	bws1|sds1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023519	2542845	2539694	279291	276248	SPAC824.04	SPBC1709.08	SPAC824.04	cft1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023520	2542845	2541099	279291	277614	SPAC824.04	SPBC646.04	SPAC824.04	pla1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023521	2542845	2539414	279291	275979	SPAC824.04	SPCC74.02c	SPAC824.04	ppn1	-	SPCC74.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023522	2542845	2539954	279291	276498	SPAC824.04	SPBC1709.15c	SPAC824.04	cft2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023523	2542845	2543538	279291	279955	SPAC824.04	SPAC1071.01c	SPAC824.04	pta1	-	SPAC4H3.15c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023524	2542845	2543131	279291	279563	SPAC824.04	SPAC12G12.04	SPAC824.04	mcp60	-	hsp60	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023525	2542845	2541505	279291	278007	SPAC824.04	SPAC57A7.04c	SPAC824.04	pabp	-	pab1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023526	2542845	2542258	279291	278727	SPAC824.04	SPAC17G6.16c	SPAC824.04	ysh1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023527	2542845	2543089	279291	279522	SPAC824.04	SPAC12G12.14c	SPAC824.04	pfs2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023529	2542845	2541193	279291	277707	SPAC824.04	SPBC776.02c	SPAC824.04	dis2	-	bws1|sds1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023530	2542845	2541018	279291	277533	SPAC824.04	SPBC3B9.11c	SPAC824.04	ctf1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023531	2542845	2543452	279291	279872	SPAC824.04	SPAC3G9.04	SPAC824.04	ssu72	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023532	2542845	2541506	279291	278008	SPAC824.04	SPAC227.08c	SPAC824.04	yth1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023533	2542845	2541873	279291	278363	SPAC824.04	SPAC22G7.10	SPAC824.04	iss1	-	SPAC22G7.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023534	2542845	2543595	279291	280010	SPAC824.04	SPAC4G9.11c	SPAC824.04	cmb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023535	2542845	2542772	279291	279221	SPAC824.04	SPAC16.02c	SPAC824.04	srp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023536	2542845	2541150	279291	277665	SPAC824.04	SPBC660.15	SPAC824.04	SPBC660.15	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023537	2539817	2541193	276367	277707	SPBC146.03c	SPBC776.02c	cut3	dis2	smc4	bws1|sds1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	mild effect on growth	-	BIOGRID
1023538	2543452	2539414	279872	275979	SPAC3G9.04	SPCC74.02c	ssu72	ppn1	-	SPCC74.02c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Vanoosthuyse V (2014)	24945319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
1023578	2540244	2542007	276776	278490	SPBC336.01	SPAC20H4.07	fbh1	rad57	fdh|fdh1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tsutsui Y (2014)	25165823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:wild type	Table 2|rescues crossover formation	-	BIOGRID
1023579	2540244	2540574	276776	277101	SPBC336.01	SPBC409.03	fbh1	swi5	fdh|fdh1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tsutsui Y (2014)	25165823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue	Table 2|rescues crossover formation	-	BIOGRID
1023580	2540244	2540917	276776	277433	SPBC336.01	SPBC409.05	fbh1	skp1	fdh|fdh1	psh1|sph1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Tsutsui Y (2014)	25165823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023581	2540574	2540584	277101	277110	SPBC409.03	SPBC28F2.07	swi5	sfr1	-	dds20|mug13	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Tsutsui Y (2014)	25165823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023582	2540244	2543580	276776	279995	SPBC336.01	SPAC644.14c	fbh1	rad51	fdh|fdh1	rhp51	Biochemical Activity	physical	Tsutsui Y (2014)	25165823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	E1: Uba1|E2: Ubc4 of Ubc15|Figure 4	-	BIOGRID
1023583	2540244	2540083	276776	276621	SPBC336.01	SPBC119.02	fbh1	ubc4	fdh|fdh1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Tsutsui Y (2014)	25165823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023584	2540244	2539995	276776	276539	SPBC336.01	SPBC1105.09	fbh1	ubc15	fdh|fdh1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Tsutsui Y (2014)	25165823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1023585	2541171	2539963	277685	276507	SPBC887.09c	SPBC17F3.02	sog2	nak1	SPBC887.09c|lrp1	mor4|orb3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Gupta S (2014)	24972934	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	Coexpression of Sog2-5A and Nak1-5A increased cell length|Figure 5|in cdc16-116 cdc3-124 background	-	BIOGRID
1023586	2540637	2540880	277163	277397	SPBC29A10.02	SPBC582.03	spo5	cdc13	SPBC365.18|mrb1|mug12	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Arata M (2014)	24506453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:partial rescue	Figure 4|cdc13 overexpression partially rescues meiosis II defect in spo5 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1023587	2540637	2541861	277163	278351	SPBC29A10.02	SPAC5D6.08c	spo5	mes1	SPBC365.18|mrb1|mug12	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Arata M (2014)	24506453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:partial rescue	Figure 4|mes1 overexpression partially rescues meiosis II defect in spo5 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1023588	2540637	2539869	277163	276415	SPBC29A10.02	SPBC11B10.09	spo5	cdc2	SPBC365.18|mrb1|mug12	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Arata M (2014)	24506453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:partial rescue	Figure 4|cdc2-1w partially rescues meiosis II defect in spo5 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1023589	2540637	2539123	277163	275695	SPBC29A10.02	SPCC18B5.03	spo5	wee1	SPBC365.18|mrb1|mug12	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Arata M (2014)	24506453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:partial rescue	Figure 4|wee1-50 partially rescues meiosis II defect in spo5 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1023590	2538959	2539580	275533	276139	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC645.07	cds1	rgf1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Munoz S (2014)	24478458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 6	-	BIOGRID
1023591	2542029	2539580	278511	276139	SPAC8E11.02c	SPCC645.07	rad24	rgf1	anr5|sam4	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Munoz S (2014)	24478458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 6	-	BIOGRID
1023592	2539580	2542029	276139	278511	SPCC645.07	SPAC8E11.02c	rgf1	rad24	-	anr5|sam4	Two-hybrid	physical	Munoz S (2014)	24478458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 4	-	BIOGRID
1023593	2539580	2542029	276139	278511	SPCC645.07	SPAC8E11.02c	rgf1	rad24	-	anr5|sam4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Munoz S (2014)	24478458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 4	-	BIOGRID
1023594	2539206	2539703	275776	276256	SPCC24B10.07	SPBC16G5.15c	gad8	fkh2	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Cohen A (2014)	24928510	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1023595	2538770	2539206	275353	275776	SPCC1753.02c	SPCC24B10.07	git3	gad8	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cohen A (2014)	24928510	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Figure 4|gad8+ overexpression rescues CPT sensitivity of git3 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1023596	2541720	2539206	278214	275776	SPAC23H3.13c	SPCC24B10.07	gpa2	gad8	git8	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cohen A (2014)	24928510	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Figure 4|gad8+ overexpression rescues CPT sensitivity of gpa2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1023597	2539781	2539206	276331	275776	SPBC106.10	SPCC24B10.07	pka1	gad8	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cohen A (2014)	24928510	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Figure 4|gad8+ overexpression rescues CPT sensitivity of pka1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1023598	2539974	2539206	276518	275776	SPBC32H8.07	SPCC24B10.07	git5	gad8	gpb1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cohen A (2014)	24928510	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Figure 4|gad8+ overexpression rescues CPT sensitivity of gpb1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1023599	2541522	2542160	278023	278636	SPAC23E2.01	SPAC8C9.11	fep1	fra2	gaf2	SPAC8C9.11	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jacques JF (2014)	24897379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 6	-	BIOGRID
1023600	2541522	2540578	278023	277104	SPAC23E2.01	SPBC26H8.06	fep1	grx4	gaf2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jacques JF (2014)	24897379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 6	-	BIOGRID
1023601	2541522	2542160	278023	278636	SPAC23E2.01	SPAC8C9.11	fep1	fra2	gaf2	SPAC8C9.11	PCA	physical	Jacques JF (2014)	24897379	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 7|bimolecular fluorescence complementation	-	BIOGRID
1023619	2542173	2543254	278648	279682	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC1006.03c	mtl1	red1	SPAC17H9.02	iss3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023620	2542173	2541655	278648	278151	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC7D4.14c	mtl1	iss10	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023621	2542173	2539540	278648	276102	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC736.12c	mtl1	mmi1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023622	2542173	2541099	278648	277614	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC646.04	mtl1	pla1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023623	2542173	2541281	278648	277794	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC902.04	mtl1	rmn1	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC902.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023624	2542173	2542837	278648	279283	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC140.04	mtl1	ctr1	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC140.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023625	2542173	2540691	278648	277216	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC20F10.05	mtl1	nrl1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023626	2542173	2539733	278648	276285	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC16E9.12c	mtl1	pab2	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023627	2542173	2539683	278648	276238	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC146.05c	mtl1	cwf25	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023628	2542173	2543676	278648	280090	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC9.03c	mtl1	brr2	SPAC17H9.02	spp41	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023629	2542173	2541942	278648	278429	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC222.09	mtl1	seb1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023630	2542173	2541639	278648	278135	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC6F12.16c	mtl1	mtr4	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023631	2542173	2541143	278648	277658	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC725.08	mtl1	pir2	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC725.08|ars2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023632	2543254	2542173	279682	278648	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC17H9.02	red1	mtl1	iss3	SPAC17H9.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023633	2543254	2541655	279682	278151	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC7D4.14c	red1	iss10	iss3	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023634	2543254	2541099	279682	277614	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC646.04	red1	pla1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023635	2543254	2541281	279682	277794	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC902.04	red1	rmn1	iss3	SPBC902.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023636	2543254	2539540	279682	276102	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC736.12c	red1	mmi1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023637	2543254	2543676	279682	280090	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC9.03c	red1	brr2	iss3	spp41	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023638	2543254	2539683	279682	276238	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC146.05c	red1	cwf25	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023639	2543254	2540116	279682	276653	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC16G5.10	red1	rrp42	iss3	SPBC16G5.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023640	2543254	2540398	279682	276926	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC26H8.10	red1	dis3	iss3	rrp44	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023641	2543254	2539694	279682	276248	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC1709.08	red1	cft1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023642	2543254	2541942	279682	278429	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC222.09	red1	seb1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023643	2543254	2538897	279682	275475	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC1183.07	red1	SPCC1183.07	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023644	2543254	2541639	279682	278135	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC6F12.16c	red1	mtr4	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023645	2543254	2540873	279682	277390	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC4C3.05c	red1	nuc1	iss3	rpa1|rpa190	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023646	2543254	2541280	279682	277793	SPAC1006.03c	SPBP23A10.07	red1	rpa2	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023647	2543254	2541143	279682	277658	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC725.08	red1	pir2	iss3	SPBC725.08|ars2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023648	2543254	2541605	279682	278102	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC1F7.01c	red1	spt6	iss3	SPAC694.07c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023649	2541281	2543254	277794	279682	SPBC902.04	SPAC1006.03c	rmn1	red1	SPBC902.04	iss3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023650	2541281	2542173	277794	278648	SPBC902.04	SPAC17H9.02	rmn1	mtl1	SPBC902.04	SPAC17H9.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023651	2541281	2539540	277794	276102	SPBC902.04	SPCC736.12c	rmn1	mmi1	SPBC902.04	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023652	2541281	2539733	277794	276285	SPBC902.04	SPBC16E9.12c	rmn1	pab2	SPBC902.04	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023653	2541655	2542173	278151	278648	SPAC7D4.14c	SPAC17H9.02	iss10	mtl1	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	SPAC17H9.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023654	2541655	2543254	278151	279682	SPAC7D4.14c	SPAC1006.03c	iss10	red1	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	iss3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023655	2541655	2540398	278151	276926	SPAC7D4.14c	SPBC26H8.10	iss10	dis3	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	rrp44	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023656	2541655	2541143	278151	277658	SPAC7D4.14c	SPBC725.08	iss10	pir2	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	SPBC725.08|ars2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023657	2542173	2543254	278648	279682	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC1006.03c	mtl1	red1	SPAC17H9.02	iss3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1023658	2541281	2543254	277794	279682	SPBC902.04	SPAC1006.03c	rmn1	red1	SPBC902.04	iss3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1023659	2541655	2543254	278151	279682	SPAC7D4.14c	SPAC1006.03c	iss10	red1	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	iss3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1023660	2539733	2541281	276285	277794	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC902.04	pab2	rmn1	-	SPBC902.04	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1023661	2541099	2542173	277614	278648	SPBC646.04	SPAC17H9.02	pla1	mtl1	-	SPAC17H9.02	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1023662	2540711	2543254	277234	279682	SPBC215.12	SPAC1006.03c	cwf10	red1	snu114|spef2	iss3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023663	2543630	2540825	280044	277343	SPAC1F3.01	SPBC428.08c	rrp6	clr4	SPAC3H8.11	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	Figure 4|in the presence of phosphate|rrp6 clr4 double mutant has increased expression of pho1 mRNA	-	BIOGRID
1023664	2540691	2542173	277216	278648	SPBC20F10.05	SPAC17H9.02	nrl1	mtl1	-	SPAC17H9.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 5	-	BIOGRID
1023665	2540691	2542837	277216	279283	SPBC20F10.05	SPAC140.04	nrl1	ctr1	-	SPAC140.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 5	-	BIOGRID
1023666	2542837	2542173	279283	278648	SPAC140.04	SPAC17H9.02	ctr1	mtl1	SPAC140.04	SPAC17H9.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 5|Figure S4	-	BIOGRID
1023667	2542837	2540691	279283	277216	SPAC140.04	SPBC20F10.05	ctr1	nrl1	SPAC140.04	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 5|Figure S4	-	BIOGRID
1023668	2542173	2540691	278648	277216	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC20F10.05	mtl1	nrl1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 5	-	BIOGRID
1023669	2542837	2542173	279283	278648	SPAC140.04	SPAC17H9.02	ctr1	mtl1	SPAC140.04	SPAC17H9.02	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 5	-	BIOGRID
1023670	2540691	2540057	277216	276595	SPBC20F10.05	SPBC16H5.10c	nrl1	prp43	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S4	-	BIOGRID
1023671	2540691	2542263	277216	278732	SPBC20F10.05	SPAC17A2.08c	nrl1	ntr2	-	SPAC17A2.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S4	-	BIOGRID
1023672	2540691	2542910	277216	279353	SPBC20F10.05	SPAC1486.03c	nrl1	SPAC1486.03c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S4	-	BIOGRID
1023673	2540691	2542000	277216	278484	SPBC20F10.05	SPAC20H4.06c	nrl1	SPAC20H4.06c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S4	-	BIOGRID
1023674	2540691	2540711	277216	277234	SPBC20F10.05	SPBC215.12	nrl1	cwf10	-	snu114|spef2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S4	-	BIOGRID
1023675	2540691	2539984	277216	276528	SPBC20F10.05	SPBC1289.11	nrl1	spf38	-	cwf17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S4	-	BIOGRID
1023676	2540691	3361260	277216	280336	SPBC20F10.05	SPBP22H7.07	nrl1	prp5	-	cwf1|pi024|SPACTOKYO_453.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S4	-	BIOGRID
1023677	2540691	2541124	277216	277639	SPBC20F10.05	SPBC646.02	nrl1	cwf11	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S4	-	BIOGRID
1023678	2542837	2540711	279283	277234	SPAC140.04	SPBC215.12	ctr1	cwf10	SPAC140.04	snu114|spef2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S4	-	BIOGRID
1023679	2542837	2542480	279283	278940	SPAC140.04	SPAC2C4.03c	ctr1	smd2	SPAC140.04	cwf9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S4	-	BIOGRID
1023680	2542837	2542015	279283	278498	SPAC140.04	SPAC2G11.15c	ctr1	tgs1	SPAC140.04	SPAC521.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S4	-	BIOGRID
1023681	2542837	2542690	279283	279143	SPAC140.04	SPAC27D7.07c	ctr1	smd1	SPAC140.04	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S4	-	BIOGRID
1023682	2542837	2541124	279283	277639	SPAC140.04	SPBC646.02	ctr1	cwf11	SPAC140.04	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S4	-	BIOGRID
1023683	2542837	2542256	279283	278726	SPAC140.04	SPAC29A4.08c	ctr1	prp19	SPAC140.04	cwf8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S4	-	BIOGRID
1023684	2542837	2542684	279283	279137	SPAC140.04	SPAC26A3.08	ctr1	smb1	SPAC140.04	smb	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S4	-	BIOGRID
1023685	2542837	2543413	279283	279835	SPAC140.04	SPAC4F8.12c	ctr1	spp42	SPAC140.04	cwf6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S4	-	BIOGRID
1023686	2540711	2540691	277234	277216	SPBC215.12	SPBC20F10.05	cwf10	nrl1	snu114|spef2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lee NN (2013)	24210919	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 6	-	BIOGRID
1023687	2540637	2542047	277163	278528	SPBC29A10.02	SPAC21E11.03c	spo5	pcr1	SPBC365.18|mrb1|mug12	mts2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Togashi N (2014)	25023750	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:undetermined	Figure 4|pcr1+ overexpression suppresses sporulation defects of spo5 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1023688	2540637	2542047	277163	278528	SPBC29A10.02	SPAC21E11.03c	spo5	pcr1	SPBC365.18|mrb1|mug12	mts2	Protein-RNA	physical	Togashi N (2014)	25023750	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 5	-	BIOGRID
1023689	2540637	2542047	277163	278528	SPBC29A10.02	SPAC21E11.03c	spo5	pcr1	SPBC365.18|mrb1|mug12	mts2	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Togashi N (2014)	25023750	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 5	-	BIOGRID
1023899	2542442	2541806	278904	278297	SPACUNK12.02c	SPAC4G8.13c	cmk1	prz1	CaMK-I|SPAC25D11.02C	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Cisneros-Barroso E (2014)	25081204	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 5	-	BIOGRID
1023900	2542442	2541806	278904	278297	SPACUNK12.02c	SPAC4G8.13c	cmk1	prz1	CaMK-I|SPAC25D11.02C	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Cisneros-Barroso E (2014)	25081204	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 6|prz1+ deletion suppresses Ca2+ resistance in cmk1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1023901	2542442	2540024	278904	276568	SPACUNK12.02c	SPBP4H10.04	cmk1	ppb1	CaMK-I|SPAC25D11.02C	SPBC1346.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Cisneros-Barroso E (2014)	25081204	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 6|ppb1+ deletion suppresses Ca2+ resistance in cmk1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1023902	2542442	2542632	278904	279086	SPACUNK12.02c	SPAC24H6.05	cmk1	cdc25	CaMK-I|SPAC25D11.02C	sal2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Cisneros-Barroso E (2014)	25081204	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	Figure 7|cdc25-9A mutation suppresses cell cycle arrest and elongated cells when cmk1-T192D is overexpressed	-	BIOGRID
1023903	2541806	2542442	278297	278904	SPAC4G8.13c	SPACUNK12.02c	prz1	cmk1	-	CaMK-I|SPAC25D11.02C	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Cisneros-Barroso E (2014)	25081204	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:wild type	Figure S4|cmk1+ overexpression suppresses small cell morphology in prz1+ overexpression mutants	-	BIOGRID
1023904	2542123	2538747	278599	275330	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC132.01c	mal3	mtr1	-	SPCC132.01c|SPCC1322.17c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Carlier-Grynkorn F (2014)	24928430	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 3|mtr1 deletion partially rescues short microtubule defect in mal3 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1023905	2542123	2540180	278599	276713	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC16D10.11c	mal3	rps1801	-	rps18-1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Carlier-Grynkorn F (2014)	24928430	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytoskeleton morphology:partial rescue	Figure 4|rps1801 deletion partially rescues short microtubule defect in mal3 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1023906	2540434	2543413	276962	279835	SPBC24C6.11	SPAC4F8.12c	cwf14	spp42	-	cwf6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023907	2540434	2540753	276962	277274	SPBC24C6.11	SPBC211.02c	cwf14	cwf3	-	syf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023908	2540434	2540711	276962	277234	SPBC24C6.11	SPBC215.12	cwf14	cwf10	-	snu114|spef2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023909	2540434	2542256	276962	278726	SPBC24C6.11	SPAC29A4.08c	cwf14	prp19	-	cwf8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023910	2540434	2543583	276962	279998	SPBC24C6.11	SPAC644.12	cwf14	cdc5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023911	2540434	2540328	276962	276858	SPBC24C6.11	SPBC31F10.11c	cwf14	cwf4	-	syf3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023912	2540434	2541168	276962	277683	SPBC24C6.11	SPBC6B1.10	cwf14	prp17	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023913	2540434	2538988	276962	275562	SPBC24C6.11	SPCC188.11	cwf14	prp45	-	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023914	2540434	2543189	276962	279618	SPBC24C6.11	SPAC30D11.09	cwf14	cwf19	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023915	2540434	2540434	276962	276962	SPBC24C6.11	SPBC24C6.11	cwf14	cwf14	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023916	2540434	2541124	276962	277639	SPBC24C6.11	SPBC646.02	cwf14	cwf11	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023917	2540434	3361260	276962	280336	SPBC24C6.11	SPBP22H7.07	cwf14	prp5	-	cwf1|pi024|SPACTOKYO_453.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023918	2540434	2540585	276962	277111	SPBC24C6.11	SPBC28F2.04c	cwf14	cwf7	-	spf27	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023919	2540434	2542531	276962	278989	SPBC24C6.11	SPAC3A12.11c	cwf14	cwf2	-	prp3|cwc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023920	2540434	2538974	276962	275548	SPBC24C6.11	SPCC550.02c	cwf14	cwf5	-	ecm2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023921	2540434	2540983	276962	277499	SPBC24C6.11	SPBC337.06c	cwf14	cwf15	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023922	2540434	2538901	276962	275479	SPBC24C6.11	SPCP1E11.07c	cwf14	cwf18	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023923	2540434	2539984	276962	276528	SPBC24C6.11	SPBC1289.11	cwf14	spf38	-	cwf17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023924	2540434	2540611	276962	277137	SPBC24C6.11	SPBC3E7.13c	cwf14	syf2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023925	2540434	2541505	276962	278007	SPBC24C6.11	SPAC57A7.04c	cwf14	pabp	-	pab1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023926	2540434	2540230	276962	276762	SPBC24C6.11	SPBC32F12.05c	cwf14	cwf12	-	isy1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023927	2540434	2542480	276962	278940	SPBC24C6.11	SPAC2C4.03c	cwf14	smd2	-	cwf9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023928	2540434	2540855	276962	277372	SPBC24C6.11	SPBC4B4.05	cwf14	smg1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023929	2540434	2543019	276962	279455	SPBC24C6.11	SPAC57A10.03	cwf14	cyp1	-	cyp2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023930	2540434	2539730	276962	276282	SPBC24C6.11	SPBC1861.08c	cwf14	lea1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023931	2540434	2542222	276962	278695	SPBC24C6.11	SPAC31G5.18c	cwf14	sde2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023932	2540434	2543616	276962	280030	SPBC24C6.11	SPAC4A8.09c	cwf14	cwf21	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023933	2540434	2539607	276962	276165	SPBC24C6.11	SPBC11G11.06c	cwf14	sme1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023934	2540434	2543676	276962	280090	SPBC24C6.11	SPAC9.03c	cwf14	brr2	-	spp41	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023935	2540434	2542978	276962	279416	SPBC24C6.11	SPAC10F6.02c	cwf14	prp22	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023936	2540434	2540330	276962	276860	SPBC24C6.11	SPBC3E7.14	cwf14	smf1	-	SPBC4F6.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023937	2540434	2540057	276962	276595	SPBC24C6.11	SPBC16H5.10c	cwf14	prp43	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023938	2540434	2540801	276962	277320	SPBC24C6.11	SPBC18H10.10c	cwf14	saf4	-	cwc16|cwf16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023939	2540434	2540186	276962	276719	SPBC24C6.11	SPBC13E7.02	cwf14	cwf24	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023940	2540434	2540884	276962	277401	SPBC24C6.11	SPBC19C2.14	cwf14	smd3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023941	2540434	2539847	276962	276395	SPBC24C6.11	SPBC530.14c	cwf14	dsk1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023942	2540434	2539941	276962	276485	SPBC24C6.11	SPBC13E7.01	cwf14	cwf22	-	SPBC15D4.16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023943	2540434	2540941	276962	277457	SPBC24C6.11	SPBC365.05c	cwf14	slu7	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023944	2540434	2542874	276962	279319	SPBC24C6.11	SPAC20H4.09	cwf14	SPAC20H4.09	-	SPAC145.03	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023945	2540434	2542910	276962	279353	SPBC24C6.11	SPAC1486.03c	cwf14	SPAC1486.03c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023946	2540434	2540302	276962	276832	SPBC24C6.11	SPBC3B9.02c	cwf14	cwf28	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023947	2540434	2540067	276962	276605	SPBC24C6.11	SPBC16H5.05c	cwf14	cyp7	-	cwf27	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023948	2540434	2542000	276962	278484	SPBC24C6.11	SPAC20H4.06c	cwf14	SPAC20H4.06c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023949	2540434	2539523	276962	276085	SPBC24C6.11	SPCC622.09	cwf14	htb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023950	2540434	2541457	276962	277960	SPBC24C6.11	SPAC6G10.10c	cwf14	SPAC6G10.10c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023951	2540434	2538931	276962	275507	SPBC24C6.11	SPCC1620.10	cwf14	cwf26	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023952	2540434	2539683	276962	276238	SPBC24C6.11	SPBC146.05c	cwf14	cwf25	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023953	2540434	2540932	276962	277448	SPBC24C6.11	SPBC36.09	cwf14	sap61	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023954	2540434	2542545	276962	279002	SPBC24C6.11	SPAC19G12.07c	cwf14	rsd1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023955	2540434	2538833	276962	275414	SPBC24C6.11	SPCP1E11.11	cwf14	puf6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023956	2540434	2542001	276962	278485	SPBC24C6.11	SPAC20G8.06	cwf14	not1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023957	2540434	2542467	276962	278928	SPBC24C6.11	SPAC1834.04	cwf14	hht1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023958	2540434	2542684	276962	279137	SPBC24C6.11	SPAC26A3.08	cwf14	smb1	-	smb	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023959	2540434	2540269	276962	276800	SPBC24C6.11	SPBC28F2.03	cwf14	ppi1	-	cyp2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023960	2540434	2540622	276962	277148	SPBC24C6.11	SPBC21C3.05	cwf14	sap62	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023961	2540434	2541062	276962	277577	SPBC24C6.11	SPBC660.11	cwf14	tcg1	-	mug187	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023962	2540434	2541969	276962	278454	SPBC24C6.11	SPAC21E11.05c	cwf14	cyp8	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023963	2540434	2541461	276962	277963	SPBC24C6.11	SPAC1F3.09	cwf14	mug161	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1	-	BIOGRID
1023964	2540434	2539403	276962	275968	SPBC24C6.11	SPCC736.11	cwf14	ago1	-	csp9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	Figure 6|combined expression of ago1+, arb2+, ers1+ rescues silencing defects of cwf14 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1023965	2540434	2542879	276962	279324	SPBC24C6.11	SPAC13G7.07	cwf14	arb2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	Figure 6|combined expression of ago1+, arb2+, ers1+ rescues silencing defects of cwf14 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1023966	2540434	2538690	276962	275275	SPBC24C6.11	SPCC1393.05	cwf14	ers1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	Figure 6|combined expression of ago1+, arb2+, ers1+ rescues silencing defects of cwf14 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1023967	2540434	2539403	276962	275968	SPBC24C6.11	SPCC736.11	cwf14	ago1	-	csp9	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Figure 6|combined expression of ago1+, arb2+, ers1+ rescues TBZ sensitivity of cwf14 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1023968	2540434	2542879	276962	279324	SPBC24C6.11	SPAC13G7.07	cwf14	arb2	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Figure 6|combined expression of ago1+, arb2+, ers1+ rescues TBZ sensitivity of cwf14 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1023969	2540434	2538690	276962	275275	SPBC24C6.11	SPCC1393.05	cwf14	ers1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Figure 6|combined expression of ago1+, arb2+, ers1+ rescues TBZ sensitivity of cwf14 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1023970	2540711	2539403	277234	275968	SPBC215.12	SPCC736.11	cwf10	ago1	snu114|spef2	csp9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kallgren SP (2014)	24874881	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	Figure S3|ago1+ expression rescues silencing defects in cwf10-1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1023971	2541590	2538951	278087	275525	SPAC57A10.02	SPCC297.03	cdr2	ssp1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Deng L (2014)	24508166	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1023972	2541889	2541590	278379	278087	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC57A10.02	pom1	cdr2	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Deng L (2014)	24508166	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1023973	2538951	2542632	275525	279086	SPCC297.03	SPAC24H6.05	ssp1	cdc25	-	sal2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Deng L (2014)	24508166	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	Figure 2|ssp1 cdc25 has increased cell length at division	-	BIOGRID
1023975	2542632	2541590	279086	278087	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC57A10.02	cdc25	cdr2	sal2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Deng L (2014)	24508166	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	Figure 2|cdc25-deg cdr2-T166A has increased cell length at division	-	BIOGRID
1023976	2538951	2541590	275525	278087	SPCC297.03	SPAC57A10.02	ssp1	cdr2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Deng L (2014)	24508166	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:partial rescue	cdr2-T166E mutation partially suppressed cell length defect in ssp1 mutantFigure 2	-	BIOGRID
1023977	2538951	2541590	275525	278087	SPCC297.03	SPAC57A10.02	ssp1	cdr2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Deng L (2014)	24508166	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	Figure 2|cdr2-delta ssp1-delta has increased cell size at division	-	BIOGRID
1023978	2538951	2542029	275525	278511	SPCC297.03	SPAC8E11.02c	ssp1	rad24	-	anr5|sam4	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Freitag SI (2014)	24451546	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression through the G2/M phase transition:wild type|cell size:wild type	Figure 1|Figure 3|rad24 deletion alleviates arrest at G2/M in ssp1 mutant|rad24 deletion suppresses increased cell length of ssp1 mutant|ssp1 and rad24 overexpression results in intermediate cell length compared to overexpression of each	-	BIOGRID
1023979	2538951	2542029	275525	278511	SPCC297.03	SPAC8E11.02c	ssp1	rad24	-	anr5|sam4	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Freitag SI (2014)	24451546	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	Figure 1|ssp1 and rad24 overexpression increases cell cycle defects	-	BIOGRID
1023980	2542029	2538951	278511	275525	SPAC8E11.02c	SPCC297.03	rad24	ssp1	anr5|sam4	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Freitag SI (2014)	24451546	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:wild type	Figure 1|ssp1 and rad24 overexpression results in intermediate cell length compared to overexpression of each	-	BIOGRID
1023981	2538951	2542632	275525	279086	SPCC297.03	SPAC24H6.05	ssp1	cdc25	-	sal2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Freitag SI (2014)	24451546	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	Figure 2|ssp1 deletion exacerbates cell elongation phenotype of cdc24-22ts	-	BIOGRID
1023982	2538951	2542632	275525	279086	SPCC297.03	SPAC24H6.05	ssp1	cdc25	-	sal2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Freitag SI (2014)	24451546	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1023983	2542029	2538951	278511	275525	SPAC8E11.02c	SPCC297.03	rad24	ssp1	anr5|sam4	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Freitag SI (2014)	24451546	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 6	-	BIOGRID
1023984	2542252	2538951	278722	275525	SPAC17A2.13c	SPCC297.03	rad25	ssp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Freitag SI (2014)	24451546	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 6	-	BIOGRID
1023985	2538951	2542029	275525	278511	SPCC297.03	SPAC8E11.02c	ssp1	rad24	-	anr5|sam4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Freitag SI (2014)	24451546	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 6	-	BIOGRID
1023986	2538951	2542252	275525	278722	SPCC297.03	SPAC17A2.13c	ssp1	rad25	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Freitag SI (2014)	24451546	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 6	-	BIOGRID
1025903	2539869	2542632	276415	279086	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC24H6.05	cdc2	cdc25	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	sal2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Mahyous Saeyd SA (2014)	24861625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	Figure 1|cdc25.22 mutation suppresses CPT sensitivity in cdc2.1w mutant	-	BIOGRID
1025904	2539123	2539869	275695	276415	SPCC18B5.03	SPBC11B10.09	wee1	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Mahyous Saeyd SA (2014)	24861625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	Figure S1|cdc2.1w mutation suppresses HU sensitivity of wee1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1025905	2539869	2540885	276415	277402	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC660.14	cdc2	mik1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Mahyous Saeyd SA (2014)	24861625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	Figure S1|mik1 deletion suppresses CPT and temperature sensitivity of cdc2.1w mutant	-	BIOGRID
1025906	2539869	2538959	276415	275533	SPBC11B10.09	SPCC18B5.11c	cdc2	cds1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mahyous Saeyd SA (2014)	24861625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression through the G2/M phase transition:wild type	Figure 2|cds1 chk1 cdc2.1w triple mutant abolishes G2/M arrest seen in cdc2.1w single mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1025907	2539869	2539087	276415	275659	SPBC11B10.09	SPCC1259.13	cdc2	chk1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	rad27	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mahyous Saeyd SA (2014)	24861625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression through the G2/M phase transition:wild type	Figure 2|cds1 chk1 cdc2.1w triple mutant abolishes G2/M arrest seen in cdc2.1w single mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1025908	2539869	2540992	276415	277508	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC342.05	cdc2	crb2	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	rhp9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mahyous Saeyd SA (2014)	24861625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 2|in CPT	-	BIOGRID
1025909	2539869	2539087	276415	275659	SPBC11B10.09	SPCC1259.13	cdc2	chk1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mahyous Saeyd SA (2014)	24861625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 2|in CPT	-	BIOGRID
1025910	2539869	2543577	276415	279992	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC4H3.05	cdc2	srs2	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mahyous Saeyd SA (2014)	24861625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 4	-	BIOGRID
1025911	2539869	2541620	276415	278117	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC2G11.12	cdc2	rqh1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	hus2|rad12|rec9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mahyous Saeyd SA (2014)	24861625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 4	-	BIOGRID
1025912	2539869	2539090	276415	275662	SPBC11B10.09	SPCC126.02c	cdc2	pku70	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mahyous Saeyd SA (2014)	24861625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 4	-	BIOGRID
1025913	2539869	2541045	276415	277560	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC543.03c	cdc2	pku80	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mahyous Saeyd SA (2014)	24861625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 4	-	BIOGRID
1025914	2539869	2539004	276415	275578	SPBC11B10.09	SPCC4G3.05c	cdc2	mus81	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	slx3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mahyous Saeyd SA (2014)	24861625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 4	-	BIOGRID
1025915	2539869	2538760	276415	275343	SPBC11B10.09	SPCC970.01	cdc2	rad16	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	rad10|rad20|swi9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mahyous Saeyd SA (2014)	24861625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 4	-	BIOGRID
1025916	2539869	2539087	276415	275659	SPBC11B10.09	SPCC1259.13	cdc2	chk1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	rad27	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mahyous Saeyd SA (2014)	24861625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 4	-	BIOGRID
1025917	2539869	2540718	276415	277241	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC3H7.15	cdc2	hhp1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mahyous Saeyd SA (2014)	24861625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 4	-	BIOGRID
1025918	2540718	2539869	277241	276415	SPBC3H7.15	SPBC11B10.09	hhp1	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Mahyous Saeyd SA (2014)	24861625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Figure 6|cdc2.1w mutation partially suppresses growth in CPT of hhp1-d mutant	-	BIOGRID
1025919	2540718	2539123	277241	275695	SPBC3H7.15	SPCC18B5.03	hhp1	wee1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Mahyous Saeyd SA (2014)	24861625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Figure 6|wee1.50 mutation partially suppresses growth in CPT of hhp1-d mutant	-	BIOGRID
1025920	2540718	2540992	277241	277508	SPBC3H7.15	SPBC342.05	hhp1	crb2	-	rhp9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mahyous Saeyd SA (2014)	24861625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression through the G2/M phase transition:wild type	Figure 6|crb2 deletion suppresses G2/M block in hhp1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1025921	2540718	2538959	277241	275533	SPBC3H7.15	SPCC18B5.11c	hhp1	cds1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mahyous Saeyd SA (2014)	24861625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression through the G2/M phase transition:wild type	Figure 6|cds1 chk1 double deletion suppresses G2/M block in hhp1 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1025922	2540718	2539087	277241	275659	SPBC3H7.15	SPCC1259.13	hhp1	chk1	-	rad27	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mahyous Saeyd SA (2014)	24861625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression through the G2/M phase transition:wild type	Figure 6|cds1 chk1 double deletion suppresses G2/M block in hhp1 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1025923	2540718	2540719	277241	277242	SPBC3H7.15	SPBC216.05	hhp1	rad3	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mahyous Saeyd SA (2014)	24861625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression through the G2/M phase transition:wild type	Figure 6|rad3 deletion suppresses G2/M block in hhp1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1025924	2543382	2539497	279804	276060	SPAC890.02c	SPCC895.07	alp7	alp14	mia1	mtc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Okada N (2014)	24790093	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 3	-	BIOGRID
1025925	2539869	2543382	276415	279804	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC890.02c	cdc2	alp7	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	mia1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Okada N (2014)	24790093	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	Figure 5	-	BIOGRID
1025926	2543382	2539426	279804	275991	SPAC890.02c	SPCC962.03c	alp7	cut15	mia1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Okada N (2014)	24790093	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 7	-	BIOGRID
1025927	2541264	2541264	277778	277778	SPBC902.06	SPBC902.06	mto2	mto2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lynch EM (2014)	24704079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	multimer	-	BIOGRID
1025928	2539467	2541264	276030	277778	SPCC417.07c	SPBC902.06	mto1	mto2	mbo1|mod20	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lynch EM (2014)	24704079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025929	2539467	2540223	276030	276756	SPCC417.07c	SPBC32F12.04	mto1	gtb1	mbo1|mod20	tug1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lynch EM (2014)	24704079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025930	2541264	2539467	277778	276030	SPBC902.06	SPCC417.07c	mto2	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lynch EM (2014)	24704079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025931	2541264	2539467	277778	276030	SPBC902.06	SPCC417.07c	mto2	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Co-purification	physical	Lynch EM (2014)	24704079	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025964	2539481	2543426	276044	279846	SPCC622.16c	SPAC631.02	epe1	bdf2	kdm2	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025965	2543426	2539481	279846	276044	SPAC631.02	SPCC622.16c	bdf2	epe1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	kdm2	Two-hybrid	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025966	2543426	2542467	279846	278928	SPAC631.02	SPAC1834.04	bdf2	hht1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025967	2543426	2542463	279846	278924	SPAC631.02	SPAC1834.03c	bdf2	hhf1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	h4.1	Protein-peptide	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025968	2543426	2539499	279846	276062	SPAC631.02	SPCC622.08c	bdf2	hta1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025969	2543426	2539523	279846	276085	SPAC631.02	SPCC622.09	bdf2	htb1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025970	3361342	2539481	280418	276044	SPBC16D10.07c	SPCC622.16c	sir2	epe1	-	kdm2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification:wild type	deletion of epe1 or bdf2 reduced acetylation of Histone H4 in a sir2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1025971	3361342	2543426	280418	279846	SPBC16D10.07c	SPAC631.02	sir2	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification:wild type	deletion of epe1 or bdf2 reduced acetylation of Histone H4 in a sir2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1025972	3361342	2542463	280418	278924	SPBC16D10.07c	SPAC1834.03c	sir2	hhf1	-	h4.1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Deacetylation	-	sir2 in vitro deacetylation activity is inhibited in the presence of recombinant bdf2	-	BIOGRID
1025973	2539481	2542463	276044	278924	SPCC622.16c	SPAC1834.03c	epe1	hhf1	kdm2	h4.1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	Reducing histone dosage attenuates heterochromatin spreading in an epe1 or bdf2 mutant background	-	BIOGRID
1025974	2543426	2542463	279846	278924	SPAC631.02	SPAC1834.03c	bdf2	hhf1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	h4.1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	Reducing histone dosage attenuates heterochromatin spreading in an epe1 or bdf2 mutant background	-	BIOGRID
1025976	2543426	2541848	279846	278339	SPAC631.02	SPAC2G11.14	bdf2	taf111	SPAC631.02|nrc1	kat4|taf1|taf130	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025977	2543426	2542822	279846	279269	SPAC631.02	SPAC13F5.02c	bdf2	ptr6	SPAC631.02|nrc1	taf7	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025978	2543426	2541972	279846	278457	SPAC631.02	SPAC23C11.11	bdf2	cka1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	orb5	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025979	2543426	2540538	279846	277065	SPAC631.02	SPBC26H8.03	bdf2	cho2	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025980	2543426	2539481	279846	276044	SPAC631.02	SPCC622.16c	bdf2	epe1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	kdm2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025981	2543426	2538955	279846	275529	SPAC631.02	SPCC1450.02	bdf2	bdf1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	SPCC191.13|brf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025982	2543426	2541721	279846	278215	SPAC631.02	SPAC23G3.09	bdf2	taf4	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025983	2543426	2542351	279846	278816	SPAC631.02	SPAC57A7.06	bdf2	SPAC57A7.06	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025984	2543426	2541649	279846	278145	SPAC631.02	SPAC1F3.06c	bdf2	spo15	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025985	2543426	2539882	279846	276428	SPAC631.02	SPBC15D4.14	bdf2	taf73	SPAC631.02|nrc1	taf5|taf5l	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025986	2543426	2540071	279846	276609	SPAC631.02	SPBC13E7.10c	bdf2	brf1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	SPBC30D10.20	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025987	2543426	2542638	279846	279092	SPAC631.02	SPAC1250.01	bdf2	snf21	SPAC631.02|nrc1	SPAC29A4.21|brg1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025988	2543426	2539380	279846	275946	SPAC631.02	SPCC18.05c	bdf2	SPCC18.05c	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025989	2543426	2543179	279846	279609	SPAC631.02	SPAP8A3.12c	bdf2	tpp2	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025990	2543426	2540028	279846	276572	SPAC631.02	SPBC16E9.09c	bdf2	erp5	SPAC631.02|nrc1	SPBC16E9.09c|erp6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025991	2543426	2542482	279846	278942	SPAC631.02	SPAP8A3.06	bdf2	uaf2	SPAC631.02|nrc1	SPAP8A3.06|ods2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025992	2543426	2541479	279846	277981	SPAC631.02	SPAC27F1.06c	bdf2	SPAC27F1.06c	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025993	2543426	2542059	279846	278537	SPAC631.02	SPAC328.06	bdf2	ubp2	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025994	2543426	2541605	279846	278102	SPAC631.02	SPAC1F7.01c	bdf2	spt6	SPAC631.02|nrc1	SPAC694.07c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025995	2543426	2540292	279846	276823	SPAC631.02	SPBC28F2.12	bdf2	rpb1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025996	2543426	3361515	279846	280591	SPAC631.02	SPAC821.13c	bdf2	SPAC821.13c	SPAC631.02|nrc1	SPAC955.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025997	2543426	2543107	279846	279539	SPAC631.02	SPAC3A12.05c	bdf2	taf2	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025998	2543426	2542564	279846	279020	SPAC631.02	SPAC1851.03	bdf2	ckb1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1025999	2543426	2540464	279846	276992	SPAC631.02	SPBC23E6.02	bdf2	rrp2	SPAC631.02|nrc1	SPBC23E6.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026000	2543426	2541131	279846	277646	SPAC631.02	SPBC713.02c	bdf2	ubp15	SPAC631.02|nrc1	ubp21|ubpD	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026001	2543426	2543133	279846	279565	SPAC631.02	SPAC12G12.05c	bdf2	taf9	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026002	2543426	2542014	279846	278497	SPAC631.02	SPAC20H4.04	bdf2	fml2	SPAC631.02|nrc1	mfh2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026003	2543426	2542060	279846	278538	SPAC631.02	SPAC23C11.14	bdf2	zhf1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	zhf	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026004	2543426	2538744	279846	275327	SPAC631.02	SPCC306.03c	bdf2	cnd2	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026005	2543426	2541540	279846	278040	SPAC631.02	SPAC1071.06	bdf2	arp9	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026006	2543426	2542568	279846	279024	SPAC631.02	SPAC1952.02	bdf2	tma23	SPAC631.02|nrc1	SPAC1952.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026007	2543426	2538885	279846	275463	SPAC631.02	SPCC330.13	bdf2	rpc37	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026008	2543426	2540620	279846	277146	SPAC631.02	SPBC4.04c	bdf2	mcm2	SPAC631.02|nrc1	cdc19|nda1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026009	2543426	2541651	279846	278147	SPAC631.02	SPAC25B8.12c	bdf2	SPAC25B8.12c	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026010	2543426	2540164	279846	276699	SPAC631.02	SPBC1683.03c	bdf2	SPBC1683.03c	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026011	2543426	2540557	279846	277084	SPAC631.02	SPBC29A10.04	bdf2	psm1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	smc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026012	2543426	2541438	279846	277943	SPAC631.02	SPAC23G3.10c	bdf2	ssr3	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026013	2543426	2539079	279846	275651	SPAC631.02	SPCC1223.01	bdf2	SPCC1223.01	SPAC631.02|nrc1	SPCC285.18	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026014	2543426	2539353	279846	275919	SPAC631.02	SPCC5E4.03c	bdf2	taf5	SPAC631.02|nrc1	taf72	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026015	2543426	2541281	279846	277794	SPAC631.02	SPBC902.04	bdf2	rmn1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	SPBC902.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026016	2543426	2539920	279846	276464	SPAC631.02	SPBC119.08	bdf2	pmk1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	spm1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026017	2543426	2543491	279846	279911	SPAC631.02	SPAC683.02c	bdf2	SPAC683.02c	SPAC631.02|nrc1	SPAC694.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026018	2543426	2541094	279846	277609	SPAC631.02	SPBC651.08c	bdf2	rpc1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026019	2543426	2540792	279846	277311	SPAC631.02	SPBC4F6.06	bdf2	kin1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026020	2543426	2543443	279846	279863	SPAC631.02	SPAC3H1.12c	bdf2	snt2	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026021	2543426	2543351	279846	279773	SPAC631.02	SPAC8C9.03	bdf2	cgs1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026022	2543426	2539975	279846	276519	SPAC631.02	SPBC12C2.06	bdf2	dbp5	SPAC631.02|nrc1	SPBC12C2.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026023	2543426	2540614	279846	277140	SPAC631.02	SPBC21H7.02	bdf2	taf10	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026024	2543426	2541536	279846	278036	SPAC631.02	SPAC1071.02	bdf2	mms19	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026025	2543426	2540393	279846	276921	SPAC631.02	SPBC19F5.03	bdf2	sac11	SPAC631.02|nrc1	SPBC19F5.03	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026026	2543426	2539831	279846	276380	SPAC631.02	SPBC15C4.05	bdf2	dhx29	SPAC631.02|nrc1	SPBC15C4.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026027	2543426	2543620	279846	280034	SPAC631.02	SPAC4D7.04c	bdf2	rer2	SPAC631.02|nrc1	SPAC4D7.04c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026028	2543426	2543155	279846	279586	SPAC631.02	SPAC30D11.03	bdf2	ddx27	SPAC631.02|nrc1	drs1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026029	2543426	2540409	279846	276937	SPAC631.02	SPBC2D10.11c	bdf2	nap2	SPAC631.02|nrc1	nap1.2|nap12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026030	2543426	2540359	279846	276888	SPAC631.02	SPBC30D10.14	bdf2	SPBC30D10.14	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026031	2543426	2539311	279846	275878	SPAC631.02	SPCP1E11.06	bdf2	apl4	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026032	2543426	2539685	279846	276240	SPAC631.02	SPBC1734.04	bdf2	anp1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	SPBC337.20	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026033	2543426	2542799	279846	279247	SPAC631.02	SPAC1687.01	bdf2	rpc19	SPAC631.02|nrc1	SPAPYUL23.01|rpa17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026034	2543426	2539133	279846	275705	SPAC631.02	SPCC16C4.18c	bdf2	taf6	SPAC631.02|nrc1	taf50	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026035	2543426	2542974	279846	279413	SPAC631.02	SPAC11D3.02c	bdf2	SPAC11D3.02c	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026036	2543426	2542064	279846	278541	SPAC631.02	SPAC21E11.06	bdf2	tif224	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026037	2543426	2543007	279846	279445	SPAC631.02	SPAC11D3.04c	bdf2	SPAC11D3.04c	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026038	2543426	2541759	279846	278253	SPAC631.02	SPAC5H10.03	bdf2	SPAC5H10.03	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026039	2543426	2541916	279846	278406	SPAC631.02	SPAC23C4.19	bdf2	spt5	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026040	2543426	2539941	279846	276485	SPAC631.02	SPBC13E7.01	bdf2	cwf22	SPAC631.02|nrc1	SPBC15D4.16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026041	2543426	2539389	279846	275954	SPAC631.02	SPCC1827.05c	bdf2	SPCC1827.05c	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026042	2543426	2542965	279846	279405	SPAC631.02	SPAC3G6.04	bdf2	rnp24	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026043	2543426	2541476	279846	277978	SPAC631.02	SPAC2E1P5.05	bdf2	rrp9	SPAC631.02|nrc1	SPAC2E1P5.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026044	2543426	2543276	279846	279704	SPAC631.02	SPAC1002.04c	bdf2	taf11	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026045	2543426	2540541	279846	277068	SPAC631.02	SPBC1A4.03c	bdf2	top2	SPAC631.02|nrc1	ptr11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026046	2543426	2538776	279846	275358	SPAC631.02	SPCC1494.06c	bdf2	SPCC1494.06c	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026047	2539481	2543333	276044	279756	SPCC622.16c	SPAC694.02	epe1	SPAC694.02	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026048	2539481	2541479	276044	277981	SPCC622.16c	SPAC27F1.06c	epe1	SPAC27F1.06c	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026049	2539481	2541280	276044	277793	SPCC622.16c	SPBP23A10.07	epe1	rpa2	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026050	2539481	2541762	276044	278256	SPCC622.16c	SPAC139.01c	epe1	SPAC139.01c	kdm2	SPAC955.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026051	2539481	2543371	276044	279793	SPCC622.16c	SPAPB1A10.06c	epe1	SPAPB1A10.06c	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026052	2539481	2540873	276044	277390	SPCC622.16c	SPBC4C3.05c	epe1	nuc1	kdm2	rpa1|rpa190	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026053	2539481	2539616	276044	276174	SPCC622.16c	SPBC17G9.02c	epe1	cdc73	kdm2	SPBC17G9.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026054	2539481	2541383	276044	277894	SPCC622.16c	SPBP8B7.16c	epe1	dbp2	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026055	2539481	2541863	276044	278353	SPCC622.16c	SPAC22E12.07	epe1	rna1	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026056	2539481	2543413	276044	279835	SPCC622.16c	SPAC4F8.12c	epe1	spp42	kdm2	cwf6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026057	2539481	2543042	276044	279477	SPCC622.16c	SPAP8A3.09c	epe1	paa1	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026058	2539481	2539002	276044	275576	SPCC622.16c	SPCC830.07c	epe1	psi1	kdm2	psi	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026059	2539481	2543631	276044	280045	SPCC622.16c	SPAC458.02c	epe1	SPAC458.02c	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026060	2539481	2539975	276044	276519	SPCC622.16c	SPBC12C2.06	epe1	dbp5	kdm2	SPBC12C2.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026061	2539481	2542942	276044	279383	SPCC622.16c	SPAC32A11.04c	epe1	tif212	kdm2	SPAC6B12.17c|tif22	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026062	2539481	2541668	276044	278164	SPCC622.16c	SPAC1F7.02c	epe1	has1	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026063	2539481	2539699	276044	276252	SPCC622.16c	SPBC11G11.05	epe1	rpa34	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026064	2539481	2541630	276044	278126	SPCC622.16c	SPAC1093.05	epe1	SPAC1093.05	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026066	2539481	2540213	276044	276746	SPCC622.16c	SPBC17D1.06	epe1	dbp3	kdm2	SPCC17D1.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026067	2539481	2543155	276044	279586	SPCC622.16c	SPAC30D11.03	epe1	ddx27	kdm2	drs1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026068	2539481	2539889	276044	276435	SPCC622.16c	SPBC106.14c	epe1	sda1	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026069	2539481	2540869	276044	277386	SPCC622.16c	SPBC4B4.09	epe1	usp105	kdm2	prp39	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026070	2539481	2539180	276044	275751	SPCC622.16c	SPCC16C4.09	epe1	sts5	kdm2	orb4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026071	2539481	2540883	276044	277400	SPCC622.16c	SPBC577.06c	epe1	stt4	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026072	2539481	2543305	276044	279729	SPCC622.16c	SPAPJ696.02	epe1	lsb4	kdm2	SPAPJ696.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026073	2539481	2543505	276044	279923	SPCC622.16c	SPAC637.09	epe1	SPAC637.09	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026074	2539481	2541851	276044	278342	SPCC622.16c	SPAC23H3.10	epe1	ssr2	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026075	2539481	2540426	276044	276954	SPCC622.16c	SPBC23E6.07c	epe1	rfc1	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026076	2539481	2543426	276044	279846	SPCC622.16c	SPAC631.02	epe1	bdf2	kdm2	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026077	2539481	2539311	276044	275878	SPCC622.16c	SPCP1E11.06	epe1	apl4	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026078	2539481	2540614	276044	277140	SPCC622.16c	SPBC21H7.02	epe1	taf10	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026079	2539481	2540967	276044	277483	SPCC622.16c	SPBC36B7.08c	epe1	SPBC36B7.08c	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026080	2539481	2539992	276044	276536	SPCC622.16c	SPBC1289.04c	epe1	pob1	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026081	2539481	2541942	276044	278429	SPCC622.16c	SPAC222.09	epe1	seb1	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026082	2539481	2539133	276044	275705	SPCC622.16c	SPCC16C4.18c	epe1	taf6	kdm2	taf50	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026083	2539481	2541916	276044	278406	SPCC622.16c	SPAC23C4.19	epe1	spt5	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026084	2539481	3361484	276044	280560	SPCC622.16c	SPAC1A6.02	epe1	SPAC1A6.02	kdm2	SPAC23C4.21	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026085	2539481	2539730	276044	276282	SPCC622.16c	SPBC1861.08c	epe1	lea1	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026086	2539481	2541609	276044	278106	SPCC622.16c	SPAC22F8.10c	epe1	sap145	kdm2	SF3b145	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026087	2539481	2541605	276044	278102	SPCC622.16c	SPAC1F7.01c	epe1	spt6	kdm2	SPAC694.07c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026088	2539481	2540432	276044	276960	SPCC622.16c	SPBC25H2.05	epe1	egd2	kdm2	nac1|ucp15	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026089	2539481	2539663	276044	276218	SPCC622.16c	SPBC1289.07c	epe1	rpc40	kdm2	rpa42	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026090	2539481	2541476	276044	277978	SPCC622.16c	SPAC2E1P5.05	epe1	rrp9	kdm2	SPAC2E1P5.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026091	2539481	2541119	276044	277634	SPCC622.16c	SPBC651.11c	epe1	apm3	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026092	2539481	2539216	276044	275786	SPCC622.16c	SPCC14G10.04	epe1	SPCC14G10.04	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026093	2539481	2540528	276044	277056	SPCC622.16c	SPBC18H10.04c	epe1	sce3	kdm2	tif48	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026094	2539481	2543108	276044	279540	SPCC622.16c	SPAC3A12.13c	epe1	SPAC3A12.13c	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026095	2539481	2541817	276044	278308	SPCC622.16c	SPAC23H4.09	epe1	cdb4	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026096	2539481	3361342	276044	280418	SPCC622.16c	SPBC16D10.07c	epe1	sir2	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026097	2539481	2539488	276044	276051	SPCC622.16c	SPCC645.08c	epe1	snd1	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026098	2539481	2539668	276044	276223	SPCC622.16c	SPBC11B10.10c	epe1	pht1	kdm2	pi001	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026099	2539481	2541639	276044	278135	SPCC622.16c	SPAC6F12.16c	epe1	mtr4	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026100	2539481	2541812	276044	278303	SPCC622.16c	SPAC23G3.12c	epe1	SPAC23G3.12c	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026101	2539481	2541131	276044	277646	SPCC622.16c	SPBC713.02c	epe1	ubp15	kdm2	ubp21|ubpD	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026102	2539481	2541750	276044	278244	SPCC622.16c	SPAC2G11.11c	epe1	prh1	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026103	2539481	2543393	276044	279815	SPCC622.16c	SPAC4G9.08c	epe1	rpc2	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026104	2539481	2543515	276044	279933	SPCC622.16c	SPAC4F10.14c	epe1	btf3	kdm2	btt1|egd1|nac2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026105	2539481	2539997	276044	276541	SPCC622.16c	SPBC1604.14c	epe1	shk1	kdm2	orb2|pak1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026106	2539481	2539831	276044	276380	SPCC622.16c	SPBC15C4.05	epe1	dhx29	kdm2	SPBC15C4.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026107	2539481	2538861	276044	275441	SPCC622.16c	SPCC1620.11	epe1	nup97	kdm2	mug87	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026108	2539481	2542017	276044	278500	SPCC622.16c	SPAC8C9.15c	epe1	tif225	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026109	2539481	2542300	276044	278767	SPCC622.16c	SPAC1687.22c	epe1	puf3	kdm2	SPAC222.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026110	2539481	2541771	276044	278265	SPCC622.16c	SPAC23H3.06	epe1	apl6	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026111	2539481	2539396	276044	275961	SPCC622.16c	SPCP25A2.03	epe1	SPCP25A2.03	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026112	2539481	2542197	276044	278672	SPCC622.16c	SPAC1142.01	epe1	rqc1	kdm2	SPAC1142.01|SPAC17G6.18	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026113	2539481	2541124	276044	277639	SPCC622.16c	SPBC646.02	epe1	cwf11	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026114	2539481	2540753	276044	277274	SPCC622.16c	SPBC211.02c	epe1	cwf3	kdm2	syf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026115	2539481	2542663	276044	279116	SPCC622.16c	SPAC607.03c	epe1	snu13	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026116	2539481	2539241	276044	275811	SPCC622.16c	SPCC1840.06	epe1	atp5	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026117	2539481	2539633	276044	276189	SPCC622.16c	SPBC1826.01c	epe1	mot1	kdm2	SPBC25B2.12.c|SPBC6B1.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026118	2539481	2540149	276044	276686	SPCC622.16c	SPBC1289.03c	epe1	spi1	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026119	2539481	2543630	276044	280044	SPCC622.16c	SPAC1F3.01	epe1	rrp6	kdm2	SPAC3H8.11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026120	2539481	2540570	276044	277097	SPCC622.16c	SPBC25H2.16c	epe1	gga22	kdm2	SPBC25H2.16c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026121	2539481	2542936	276044	279377	SPCC622.16c	SPAC12G12.06c	epe1	SPAC12G12.06c	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026122	2539481	2542246	276044	278716	SPCC622.16c	SPAC17H9.12c	epe1	SPAC17H9.12c	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026123	2539481	2538781	276044	275362	SPCC622.16c	SPCC1753.01c	epe1	ssb2	kdm2	SPCC584.06c|rpa2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026124	2539481	2541493	276044	277995	SPCC622.16c	SPAC27E2.10c	epe1	rfc3	kdm2	SPAPJ698.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026125	2539481	2539542	276044	276104	SPCC622.16c	SPCC4G3.18	epe1	rix1	kdm2	SPCC4G3.18	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026126	2539481	2543538	276044	279955	SPCC622.16c	SPAC1071.01c	epe1	pta1	kdm2	SPAC4H3.15c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026127	2539481	2540306	276044	276836	SPCC622.16c	SPBC2G5.02c	epe1	ckb2	kdm2	SPBC2G5.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026128	2539481	2541914	276044	278404	SPCC622.16c	SPAC2F3.03c	epe1	rpa49	kdm2	rpa51	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026129	2539481	2539154	276044	275726	SPCC622.16c	SPCC11E10.07c	epe1	SPCC11E10.07c	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026130	2539481	2541867	276044	278357	SPCC622.16c	SPAC22E12.14c	epe1	sck2	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026131	2539481	2540032	276044	276575	SPCC622.16c	SPBC1703.14c	epe1	top1	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026132	2539481	2541721	276044	278215	SPCC622.16c	SPAC23G3.09	epe1	taf4	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026133	2539481	2541540	276044	278040	SPCC622.16c	SPAC1071.06	epe1	arp9	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026134	2539481	2542652	276044	279106	SPCC622.16c	SPAC1687.15	epe1	gsk3	kdm2	skp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026135	2539481	2541873	276044	278363	SPCC622.16c	SPAC22G7.10	epe1	iss1	kdm2	SPAC22G7.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026136	2539481	2541599	276044	278096	SPCC622.16c	SPAC24B11.11c	epe1	sid2	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026137	2539481	2541094	276044	277609	SPCC622.16c	SPBC651.08c	epe1	rpc1	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026138	2539481	2541117	276044	277632	SPCC622.16c	SPBC646.13	epe1	sds23	kdm2	moc1|psp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026139	2539481	2538838	276044	275419	SPCC622.16c	SPCC1682.02c	epe1	mcm3	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026140	2539481	2539206	276044	275776	SPCC622.16c	SPCC24B10.07	epe1	gad8	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026141	2539481	2539109	276044	275681	SPCC622.16c	SPCC74.03c	epe1	ssp2	kdm2	ucp9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026142	2539481	2539476	276044	276039	SPCC622.16c	SPCC364.04c	epe1	coy1	kdm2	SPCC364.04c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026143	2539481	2539406	276044	275971	SPCC622.16c	SPCC4G3.07c	epe1	phf1	kdm2	saf50|swp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026144	2539481	2542698	276044	279151	SPCC622.16c	SPAC26H5.09c	epe1	SPAC26H5.09c	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026145	2539481	2539106	276044	275678	SPCC622.16c	SPCC757.08	epe1	rrp45	kdm2	SPCC757.08	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026146	2539481	2542638	276044	279092	SPCC622.16c	SPAC1250.01	epe1	snf21	kdm2	SPAC29A4.21|brg1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026147	2539481	2539017	276044	275590	SPCC622.16c	SPCC338.13	epe1	cog4	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026148	2539481	2542791	276044	279240	SPCC622.16c	SPAC167.04	epe1	pam17	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026149	2539481	2539477	276044	276040	SPCC622.16c	SPCP31B10.06	epe1	mug190	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026150	2539481	2542375	276044	278839	SPCC622.16c	SPAC6G10.05c	epe1	trs120	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026151	2539481	2541871	276044	278361	SPCC622.16c	SPAC22F3.09c	epe1	res2	kdm2	mcs1|pct1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026152	2539481	2539703	276044	276256	SPCC622.16c	SPBC16G5.15c	epe1	fkh2	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026153	2539481	3361381	276044	280457	SPCC622.16c	SPAC12G12.01c	epe1	SPAC12G12.01c	kdm2	SPAC630.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026154	2539481	2538906	276044	275483	SPCC622.16c	SPCC1259.03	epe1	rpa12	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026155	2539481	2542144	276044	278620	SPCC622.16c	SPAC6F6.17	epe1	rif1	kdm2	SPAPJ736.01|tap1|tap11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026156	2539481	2539511	276044	276073	SPCC622.16c	SPCC663.01c	epe1	ekc1	kdm2	SPCC777.16c|eck1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026157	2539481	2540728	276044	277251	SPCC622.16c	SPBC216.06c	epe1	swi1	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026158	2539481	2540410	276044	276938	SPCC622.16c	SPBC2D10.04	epe1	SPBC2D10.04	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026159	2539481	2540821	276044	277339	SPCC622.16c	SPBC800.03	epe1	clr3	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026160	2539481	2543082	276044	279515	SPCC622.16c	SPAC3C7.08c	epe1	elf1	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026161	2539481	2540409	276044	276937	SPCC622.16c	SPBC2D10.11c	epe1	nap2	kdm2	nap1.2|nap12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026162	2539481	2541575	276044	278072	SPCC622.16c	SPAC12B10.01c	epe1	SPAC12B10.01c	kdm2	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026163	2539481	2541910	276044	278400	SPCC622.16c	SPAC23C4.15	epe1	rpb5	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026164	2539481	5802967	276044	858105	SPCC622.16c	SPAC20G4.08	epe1	pdc1	kdm2	SPAC20G4.08|SPAC4F10.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026165	2539481	2542964	276044	279404	SPCC622.16c	SPAC12G12.07c	epe1	SPAC12G12.07c	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026166	2539481	2542103	276044	278579	SPCC622.16c	SPAC31G5.11	epe1	pac2	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026167	2539481	2539645	276044	276200	SPCC622.16c	SPBC146.07	epe1	prp2	kdm2	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026168	2539481	2542204	276044	278679	SPCC622.16c	SPAC17A5.14	epe1	exo2	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026169	2539481	2541972	276044	278457	SPCC622.16c	SPAC23C11.11	epe1	cka1	kdm2	orb5	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026170	2539481	2538827	276044	275408	SPCC622.16c	SPCC63.14	epe1	eis1	kdm2	SPCC63.14	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026171	2539481	2540127	276044	276664	SPCC622.16c	SPBC106.20	epe1	exo70	kdm2	SPBC582.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026172	2539481	2542406	276044	278870	SPCC622.16c	SPAC17A5.13	epe1	SPAC17A5.13	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026173	2539481	2539817	276044	276367	SPCC622.16c	SPBC146.03c	epe1	cut3	kdm2	smc4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026174	2539481	2543197	276044	279626	SPCC622.16c	SPAC31A2.07c	epe1	dbp10	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026175	2539481	2541255	276044	277769	SPCC622.16c	SPBC947.02	epe1	apl2	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026176	2539481	2538955	276044	275529	SPCC622.16c	SPCC1450.02	epe1	bdf1	kdm2	SPCC191.13|brf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026177	2539481	2539941	276044	276485	SPCC622.16c	SPBC13E7.01	epe1	cwf22	kdm2	SPBC15D4.16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026178	2539481	2538974	276044	275548	SPCC622.16c	SPCC550.02c	epe1	cwf5	kdm2	ecm2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026179	2539481	2543676	276044	280090	SPCC622.16c	SPAC9.03c	epe1	brr2	kdm2	spp41	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026180	2539481	2540006	276044	276550	SPCC622.16c	SPBC1711.17	epe1	prp16	kdm2	SPBC17G9.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026181	2539481	2538988	276044	275562	SPCC622.16c	SPCC188.11	epe1	prp45	kdm2	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026182	2539481	2541437	276044	277942	SPCC622.16c	SPAC22A12.09c	epe1	sap114	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026183	2539481	2538964	276044	275538	SPCC622.16c	SPCC285.12	epe1	lsm7	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026184	2539481	2540932	276044	277448	SPCC622.16c	SPBC36.09	epe1	sap61	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026185	2539481	2540057	276044	276595	SPCC622.16c	SPBC16H5.10c	epe1	prp43	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026186	2539481	2543278	276044	279706	SPCC622.16c	SPAPJ698.03c	epe1	prp12	kdm2	sap130|SF3b130	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026187	2539481	2540328	276044	276858	SPCC622.16c	SPBC31F10.11c	epe1	cwf4	kdm2	syf3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026188	2539481	2540292	276044	276823	SPCC622.16c	SPBC28F2.12	epe1	rpb1	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026189	2539481	2541446	276044	277951	SPCC622.16c	SPAC23G3.01	epe1	rpb2	kdm2	SPAC521.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026190	2539481	2539041	276044	275614	SPCC622.16c	SPCC18.06c	epe1	caf1	kdm2	pop2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026191	2539481	2542965	276044	279405	SPCC622.16c	SPAC3G6.04	epe1	rnp24	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026192	2539481	2541602	276044	278099	SPCC622.16c	SPAC1F5.10	epe1	SPAC1F5.10	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026193	2539481	2542674	276044	279127	SPCC622.16c	SPAC26A3.12c	epe1	dhp1	kdm2	rat1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026194	2539481	2538747	276044	275330	SPCC622.16c	SPCC132.01c	epe1	mtr1	kdm2	SPCC132.01c|SPCC1322.17c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026195	2539481	2541114	276044	277629	SPCC622.16c	SPBC582.09	epe1	pex11	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026196	2539481	2541434	276044	277939	SPCC622.16c	SPAC27E2.03c	epe1	SPAC27E2.03c	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026197	2539481	2539162	276044	275734	SPCC622.16c	SPCC14G10.02	epe1	urb1	kdm2	SPCC14G10.02|SPCC18B5.13	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2013)	24013502	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026218	2540099	2543199	276637	279628	SPBC16H5.11c	SPAC821.03c	skb1	slf1	rmt5	SPAC821.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Deng L (2014)	25009287	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1026219	2540099	2540547	276637	277074	SPBC16H5.11c	SPBC32F12.11	skb1	tdh1	rmt5	gpd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Deng L (2014)	25009287	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1026220	2540099	2542253	276637	278723	SPBC16H5.11c	SPAC17H9.04c	skb1	SPAC17H9.04c	rmt5	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Deng L (2014)	25009287	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1026221	2540099	2543621	276637	280035	SPBC16H5.11c	SPAC4A8.16c	skb1	tif33	rmt5	SPAC823.01c|SPAC1E11.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Deng L (2014)	25009287	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1026222	2540099	2539973	276637	276517	SPBC16H5.11c	SPBC1539.09c	skb1	trp1	rmt5	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Deng L (2014)	25009287	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1026223	2540099	2542744	276637	279194	SPBC16H5.11c	SPAC1565.08	skb1	cdc48	rmt5	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Deng L (2014)	25009287	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1026224	2540099	2541280	276637	277793	SPBC16H5.11c	SPBP23A10.07	skb1	rpa2	rmt5	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Deng L (2014)	25009287	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1026225	2540099	2539938	276637	276482	SPBC16H5.11c	SPBC17D11.05	skb1	tif32	rmt5	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Deng L (2014)	25009287	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1026226	2540099	2538861	276637	275441	SPBC16H5.11c	SPCC1620.11	skb1	nup97	rmt5	mug87	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Deng L (2014)	25009287	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1026227	2540099	2543199	276637	279628	SPBC16H5.11c	SPAC821.03c	skb1	slf1	rmt5	SPAC821.03c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Deng L (2014)	25009287	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1026228	2543199	2540099	279628	276637	SPAC821.03c	SPBC16H5.11c	slf1	skb1	SPAC821.03c	rmt5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Deng L (2014)	25009287	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1026229	2543199	2540099	279628	276637	SPAC821.03c	SPBC16H5.11c	slf1	skb1	SPAC821.03c	rmt5	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2014)	25009287	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1026230	2540099	2543199	276637	279628	SPBC16H5.11c	SPAC821.03c	skb1	slf1	rmt5	SPAC821.03c	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng L (2014)	25009287	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1026231	2540099	2543199	276637	279628	SPBC16H5.11c	SPAC821.03c	skb1	slf1	rmt5	SPAC821.03c	Co-localization	physical	Deng L (2014)	25009287	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 3	-	BIOGRID
1026232	2540099	2543199	276637	279628	SPBC16H5.11c	SPAC821.03c	skb1	slf1	rmt5	SPAC821.03c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Deng L (2014)	25009287	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	Figure 6|slf1 deletion rescues reduced cell size at division of skb1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1026233	2543685	2543069	280099	279502	SPAC3C7.03c	SPAC3A11.05c	rad55	kms1	rhp55	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Swartz RK (2014)	24943839	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	Figure 5|kms1 deletion rescues HU sensitivity of rad55 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1026234	2543580	2543069	279995	279502	SPAC644.14c	SPAC3A11.05c	rad51	kms1	rhp51	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Swartz RK (2014)	24943839	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	Figure 5|kms1 deletion rescues HU sensitivity of rad51 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1026235	2540348	2543069	276877	279502	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC3A11.05c	exo1	kms1	mut2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Swartz RK (2014)	24943839	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	Figure 5|kms1 deletion rescues HU sensitivity of exo1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1026236	2542632	2540329	279086	276859	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC29B5.01	cdc25	atf1	sal2	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bandyopadhyay S (2014)	24728197	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Figure 1|cdc25-22 atf1 double mutant at 33 degrees	-	BIOGRID
1026237	2542632	2540329	279086	276859	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC29B5.01	cdc25	atf1	sal2	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bandyopadhyay S (2014)	24728197	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:wild type	Figure 1|atf1 overexpression rescues increased cell length of cdc25-22 mutant at 37 degrees	-	BIOGRID
1026238	2542632	2540329	279086	276859	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC29B5.01	cdc25	atf1	sal2	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bandyopadhyay S (2014)	24728197	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	Figure 1|cdc25-22 atf1 double mutant has increased cell length at 37 degrees	-	BIOGRID
1026239	2539123	2540329	275695	276859	SPCC18B5.03	SPBC29B5.01	wee1	atf1	-	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Bandyopadhyay S (2014)	24728197	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Figure 3|atf1 overexpression causes a growth defect in wee1-50 mutant at 37 degrees	-	BIOGRID
1026241	2540880	2540329	277397	276859	SPBC582.03	SPBC29B5.01	cdc13	atf1	-	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Bandyopadhyay S (2014)	24728197	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	Figure 7|atf1 deletion rescues growth defect caused by cdc13 overexpression (cdc25-22 background) at 33 degrees	-	BIOGRID
1026242	2541330	2542378	277842	278842	SPBP35G2.06c	SPAC1805.04	nup131	nup132	Nup133a	Nup133b	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Asakawa H (2014)	24637836	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
1026246	2542084	2541028	278561	277543	SPAC7D4.07c	SPBC577.08c	trx1	txl1	-	trx3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Brown JD (2013)	24268782	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	Figure 4|trx1 txl1 double mutant shows increased expression of Pap1-dependent genes	-	BIOGRID
1026247	2539572	2541028	276132	277543	SPCC576.03c	SPBC577.08c	tpx1	txl1	-	trx3	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Brown JD (2013)	24268782	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	Figure 6|txl1 deletion rescues H2O2 sensitivity of tpx-C169S mutant	-	BIOGRID
1026248	2543576	2541975	279991	278460	SPAC4A8.05c	SPAC20G8.05c	myp2	cdc15	myo3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Arasada R (2014)	25159149	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Figure 6|myp2 cdc15-140 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
1026274	2543580	2540244	279995	276776	SPAC644.14c	SPBC336.01	rad51	fbh1	rhp51	fdh|fdh1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Stanescu RS (2014)	24741789	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	fbh1 deletion rescues CPT sensitivity of strain overexpressing rad51	-	BIOGRID
1026275	2539649	2542773	276204	279222	SPBC12D12.04c	SPAC16.01	pck2	rho2	pkc1|sts6	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sanchez-Mir L (2014)	24498240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification:wild type	Figure 1|pck2 deletion suppresses increased Pmk1 phosphorylation caused by rho2 overexpression	-	BIOGRID
1026276	2542773	2541612	279222	278109	SPAC16.01	SPAC1F7.04	rho2	rho1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sanchez-Mir L (2014)	24498240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 1|Figure 2|Figure 3|genetic complex|rho2 pck1 rho1-596 triple mutant has decreased Pmk1 phosphorylation|rho2 rho1-596 double mutant has decreased Pmk1 phosphorylation in response to caspofungin|rho2 rho1-596 double mutant has enhanced VIC phenotype (growth on McCl2 with FK506)	-	BIOGRID
1026277	2542773	2541612	279222	278109	SPAC16.01	SPAC1F7.04	rho2	rho1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez-Mir L (2014)	24498240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 2|Figure 4|genetic complex|rho1-596 rho2 pck1 triple mutant has increased sensitivity to Caspofungin|rho2 rho1-596 double mutant has increased sensitivity to caspofungin	-	BIOGRID
1026278	2539649	2541612	276204	278109	SPBC12D12.04c	SPAC1F7.04	pck2	rho1	pkc1|sts6	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez-Mir L (2014)	24498240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 2|pck2 rho1-596 double mutant has increased sensitivity to caspofungin	-	BIOGRID
1026279	2539920	2541612	276464	278109	SPBC119.08	SPAC1F7.04	pmk1	rho1	spm1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez-Mir L (2014)	24498240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 2|pmk1 rho1-596 double mutant has increased sensitivity to caspofungin	-	BIOGRID
1026280	2542773	2542293	279222	278761	SPAC16.01	SPAC17G8.14c	rho2	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sanchez-Mir L (2014)	24498240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	Figure 3|genetic complex|rho2 pck1 rho1-596 triple mutant has decreased Pmk1 phosphorylation	-	BIOGRID
1026281	2542293	2542773	278761	279222	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC16.01	pck1	rho2	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sanchez-Mir L (2014)	24498240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification:wild type	Figure 3|rho2+ deletion rescues increased Pmk1 phosphorylation in pck1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1026282	2542293	2542175	278761	278650	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC1F3.02c	pck1	mkh1	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sanchez-Mir L (2014)	24498240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 3|detectable only in Caspofungin-treated pck2-null (not in WT)	-	BIOGRID
1026283	2541612	2542293	278109	278761	SPAC1F7.04	SPAC17G8.14c	rho1	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sanchez-Mir L (2014)	24498240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	Figure 4|genetic complex|rho1-596 rho2 pck1 triple mutant has decreased Pmk1 phosphorylation	-	BIOGRID
1026284	2541612	2542773	278109	279222	SPAC1F7.04	SPAC16.01	rho1	rho2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sanchez-Mir L (2014)	24498240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	Figure 4|genetic complex|rho1-596 rho2 pck1 triple mutant has decreased Pmk1 phosphorylation	-	BIOGRID
1026285	2542293	2542773	278761	279222	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC16.01	pck1	rho2	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sanchez-Mir L (2014)	24498240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	Figure 4|genetic complex|rho1-596 rho2 pck1 triple mutant has decreased Pmk1 phosphorylation	-	BIOGRID
1026286	2542773	2542293	279222	278761	SPAC16.01	SPAC17G8.14c	rho2	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez-Mir L (2014)	24498240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 4|genetic complex|rho1-596 rho2 pck1 triple mutant has increased sensitivity to Caspofungin|rho2 pck1 double mutant has increased sensitivity to Caspofungin	-	BIOGRID
1026287	2542293	2541612	278761	278109	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC1F7.04	pck1	rho1	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez-Mir L (2014)	24498240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 4|genetic complex|rho1-596 rho2 pck1 triple mutant has increased sensitivity to Caspofungin	-	BIOGRID
1026288	2542517	2539499	278975	276062	SPACUNK4.14	SPCC622.08c	mdb1	hta1	-	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Wei Y (2014)	24806815	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 1|phosphorylated H2A	-	BIOGRID
1026289	2539209	2540719	275779	277242	SPCC23B6.03c	SPBC216.05	tel1	rad3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Wei Y (2014)	24806815	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionizing radiation resistance|protein/peptide distribution	Figure 2|tel1 rad3 double mutant has no Mdb1 ionizing radiation induced foci	-	BIOGRID
1026290	2542517	2539545	278975	276106	SPACUNK4.14	SPCC4B3.12	mdb1	set9	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wei Y (2014)	24806815	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 3|mdb1 set9 double mutant has increased sensitivity to CPT	-	BIOGRID
1026291	2542517	2540992	278975	277508	SPACUNK4.14	SPBC342.05	mdb1	crb2	-	rhp9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wei Y (2014)	24806815	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 3|mdb1 crb2-F400A double mutant has increased sensitivity to CPT	-	BIOGRID
1026292	2540992	2542517	277508	278975	SPBC342.05	SPACUNK4.14	crb2	mdb1	rhp9	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Wei Y (2014)	24806815	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionizing radiation resistance:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Figure 3|mdb1 deletion partially rescues IR sensitivity of crb2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1026293	2540992	2542517	277508	278975	SPBC342.05	SPACUNK4.14	crb2	mdb1	rhp9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wei Y (2014)	24806815	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 3|mdb1 crb2 double mutant has increased CPT sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
1026294	2540992	2539499	277508	276062	SPBC342.05	SPCC622.08c	crb2	hta1	rhp9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wei Y (2014)	24806815	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 3|htaAQ crb2 double mutant has increased CPT sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
1026295	2540992	2542226	277508	278699	SPBC342.05	SPAC19G12.06c	crb2	hta2	rhp9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wei Y (2014)	24806815	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 3|htaAQ crb2 double mutant has increased CPT sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
1026296	2540992	2539499	277508	276062	SPBC342.05	SPCC622.08c	crb2	hta1	rhp9	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Wei Y (2014)	24806815	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionizing radiation resistance:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Figure 3|htaAQ mutation partially rescues IR sensitivity of crb2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1026297	2540992	2542226	277508	278699	SPBC342.05	SPAC19G12.06c	crb2	hta2	rhp9	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Wei Y (2014)	24806815	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionizing radiation resistance:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Figure 3|htaAQ mutation partially rescues IR sensitivity of crb2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1026298	2542517	2539499	278975	276062	SPACUNK4.14	SPCC622.08c	mdb1	hta1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Wei Y (2014)	24806815	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue|ionizing radiation resistance:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Figure 4|htaAQ mutation suppresses sensitivity to IR, UV, HU, and CPT caused by mdb1+ overexpression	-	BIOGRID
1026299	2542517	2542226	278975	278699	SPACUNK4.14	SPAC19G12.06c	mdb1	hta2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Wei Y (2014)	24806815	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue|ionizing radiation resistance:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Figure 4|htaAQ mutation suppresses sensitivity to IR, UV, HU, and CPT caused by mdb1+ overexpression	-	BIOGRID
1026309	2542806	2542002	279254	278486	SPAC1610.01	SPAC2G11.08c	saf5	smn1	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	yab8	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Barbarossa A (2014)	24298023	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1026310	2540884	2542806	277401	279254	SPBC19C2.14	SPAC1610.01	smd3	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Barbarossa A (2014)	24298023	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1026311	2542690	2542806	279143	279254	SPAC27D7.07c	SPAC1610.01	smd1	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Barbarossa A (2014)	24298023	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1026312	2542684	2542806	279137	279254	SPAC26A3.08	SPAC1610.01	smb1	saf5	smb	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Barbarossa A (2014)	24298023	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1026313	2542806	2542690	279254	279143	SPAC1610.01	SPAC27D7.07c	saf5	smd1	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Barbarossa A (2014)	24298023	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1026314	2542806	2542690	279254	279143	SPAC1610.01	SPAC27D7.07c	saf5	smd1	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	-	Co-fractionation	physical	Barbarossa A (2014)	24298023	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1026341	2541957	2541590	278444	278087	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC57A10.02	plo1	cdr2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Atkin J (2014)	24424027	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:wild type|resistance to chemicals:wild type	Figure 6|cdr2 mutation restores Torin1-induced reduction of Wee1 in plo1.S402A mutant	-	BIOGRID
1026342	2543198	2540241	279627	276773	SPAC31A2.11c	SPBC32H8.11	cuf1	mei4	-	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Plante S (2014)	24569997	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	Figure 2|cuf1/cuf1 mei4/mei4 double mutant has no detectable ctr6+ transcript	-	BIOGRID
1026343	2539539	2542467	276101	278928	SPCC576.10c	SPAC1834.04	rpt3	hht1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kitagawa T (2014)	24710126	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:undetermined	H3 overexpression increased mini-chromosome stability in rpt3-1 mutant|Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1026344	2539658	2539539	276213	276101	SPBC1105.17	SPCC576.10c	cnp1	rpt3	sim2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kitagawa T (2014)	24710126	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 4	-	BIOGRID
1026345	2539539	2539658	276101	276213	SPCC576.10c	SPBC1105.17	rpt3	cnp1	-	sim2	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Kitagawa T (2014)	24710126	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Figure S1|cnp1+ overexpression causes a growth defect in rpt3-1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1026371	2539642	2540593	276197	277119	SPBC1706.01	SPBC28E12.03	tea4	rga4	wsh3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kokkoris K (2014)	24554432	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026372	2542635	2540334	279089	276864	SPAC24H6.09	SPBC29A3.17	gef1	gef3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Munoz S (2014)	24947517	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation	Figure 1|gef1 gef3 has enhanced septation defects	-	BIOGRID
1026373	2543168	2540334	279599	276864	SPAC31A2.16	SPBC29A3.17	gef2	gef3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Munoz S (2014)	24947517	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation	Figure 1|gef2 gef3 has enhanced septation defects	-	BIOGRID
1026374	2539437	2540334	276000	276864	SPCC645.06c	SPBC29A3.17	rgf3	gef3	lad1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Munoz S (2014)	24947517	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:undetermined	Figure 1|gef3 deletion reduces number of lysed cells in ehs2-1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1026375	2539437	2540334	276000	276864	SPCC645.06c	SPBC29A3.17	rgf3	gef3	lad1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Munoz S (2014)	24947517	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	Figure 1|gef3 deletion suppresses sensitivity to NaF of ehs2-1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1026376	2540334	3361511	276864	280587	SPBC29A3.17	SPAC23C4.08	gef3	rho3	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Munoz S (2014)	24947517	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	Figure 4|gef3 deletion rescues growth defect of cells overexpressing rho3+	-	BIOGRID
1026377	2540334	2543027	276864	279463	SPBC29A3.17	SPAC110.03	gef3	cdc42	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Munoz S (2014)	24947517	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	Figure 4|gef3 deletion rescues growth defect of cells overexpressing cdc42+	-	BIOGRID
1026378	3361511	2540334	280587	276864	SPAC23C4.08	SPBC29A3.17	rho3	gef3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Munoz S (2014)	24947517	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 4	-	BIOGRID
1026379	3361511	2540334	280587	276864	SPAC23C4.08	SPBC29A3.17	rho3	gef3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Munoz S (2014)	24947517	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 4	-	BIOGRID
1026380	2540334	2539407	276864	275972	SPBC29A3.17	SPCC970.09	gef3	sec8	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Munoz S (2014)	24947517	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Figure 6|sec8-1 gef3 double mutant shows synthetic growth defect at 35 degrees	-	BIOGRID
1026381	2540334	2541306	276864	277818	SPBC29A3.17	SPBP16F5.07	gef3	apm1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Munoz S (2014)	24947517	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Figure 6|apm1 gef3 double mutant shows synthetic growth defect at 32 degrees	-	BIOGRID
1026382	2540334	2539487	276864	276050	SPBC29A3.17	SPCC895.05	gef3	for3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Munoz S (2014)	24947517	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Figure 6|for3 gef3 double mutant shows synthetic growth defect at 35 degrees	-	BIOGRID
1026383	2540334	2539407	276864	275972	SPBC29A3.17	SPCC970.09	gef3	sec8	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Munoz S (2014)	24947517	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation	Figure 6|sec8-1 gef3 double mutant shows septation defects	-	BIOGRID
1026384	2540334	2541306	276864	277818	SPBC29A3.17	SPBP16F5.07	gef3	apm1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Munoz S (2014)	24947517	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation	Figure 6|apm1 gef3 double mutant shows septation defects	-	BIOGRID
1026385	2540334	2539487	276864	276050	SPBC29A3.17	SPCC895.05	gef3	for3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Munoz S (2014)	24947517	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology	Figure 6|for3 gef3 double mutant shows morphology defects	-	BIOGRID
1026386	2542161	2539923	278637	276467	SPAC1786.03	SPBC1539.04	cut11	tts1	SPAC24C9.01	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Zhang D (2014)	25103238	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	Figure 4|tts1+ overexpression rescues growth defect of cut11-6 at 36 degrees	-	BIOGRID
1026387	2542161	2539923	278637	276467	SPAC1786.03	SPBC1539.04	cut11	tts1	SPAC24C9.01	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Zhang D (2014)	25103238	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	Figure 4|cut11-6 tts1-delta	-	BIOGRID
1026388	2542161	2539923	278637	276467	SPAC1786.03	SPBC1539.04	cut11	tts1	SPAC24C9.01	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Zhang D (2014)	25103238	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spindle morphology	Figure 4|cut11-6 tts1 double mutant has enhanced spindle defects	-	BIOGRID
1026390	2541052	2540927	277567	277443	SPBC409.12c	SPBC365.06	stn1	pmt3	-	smt3|ubl2	Two-hybrid	physical	Garg M (2014)	24925530	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 4	-	BIOGRID
1026391	2541052	2542414	277567	278878	SPBC409.12c	SPAC6F6.16c	stn1	tpz1	-	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	Two-hybrid	physical	Garg M (2014)	24925530	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 4	-	BIOGRID
1026392	2541052	2542414	277567	278878	SPBC409.12c	SPAC6F6.16c	stn1	tpz1	-	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Garg M (2014)	24925530	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Figure 4|tpz1-Snm stn1-75	-	BIOGRID
1026393	2541590	2541590	278087	278087	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC57A10.02	cdr2	cdr2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Rincon SA (2014)	24982431	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
1026394	2541889	2541889	278379	278379	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC2F7.03c	pom1	pom1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Rincon SA (2014)	24982431	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	Figure 7	-	BIOGRID
1026395	2541889	2541590	278379	278087	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC57A10.02	pom1	cdr2	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Rincon SA (2014)	24982431	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	Figure 7	-	BIOGRID
1026396	2541590	2539205	278087	275775	SPAC57A10.02	SPCC4B3.15	cdr2	mid1	-	dmf1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rincon SA (2014)	24982431	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation	Figure 8|cdr2(bsc-3A) mid1(nsm) double mutant has increased asymmetric division	-	BIOGRID
1026397	2538902	2542738	275480	279188	SPCC13B11.01	SPAC25B8.19c	adh1	loz1	adh	SPAC25B8.19c|SPAC683.01c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ehrensberger KM (2014)	24831008	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	Figure 2|loz1 mutation rescues growth defect on antimycin A of adh1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1026439	2539020	2539668	275593	276223	SPCC5E4.06	SPBC11B10.10c	smc6	pht1	rad18	pi001	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tapia-Alveal C (2014)	24687850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue|inviable:wild type|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:partial rescue|vegetative growth:wild type	Figure 2|Figure 4|Figure S2|genetic complex|pht1 deletion rescues rtt109 smc6-74 double mutant sensitivity to HU and MMS|pht1 mutations bypass synthetic lethality of top2-191 smc6-74 double mutant|pht1-4KR suppresses the MMS sensitivity of smc6-74|pht1-4KR suppresses the UV sensitivity of smc6-74	-	BIOGRID
1026440	2539550	2540541	276111	277068	SPCC550.05	SPBC1A4.03c	nse1	top2	-	ptr11	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tapia-Alveal C (2014)	24687850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	Figure 1|nse1-C216S top2-191 double mutant is synthetic lethal	-	BIOGRID
1026441	2539550	2540541	276111	277068	SPCC550.05	SPBC1A4.03c	nse1	top2	-	ptr11	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tapia-Alveal C (2014)	24687850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation|mitotic cell cycle	Figure 1|nse1-C216S top2-191 double mutants have defects in chromosome segregation	-	BIOGRID
1026442	2539550	2539442	276111	276005	SPCC550.05	SPCC5E4.04	nse1	cut1	-	ptr4	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Tapia-Alveal C (2014)	24687850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	Figure 1|cut1+ overexpression rescues growth of nse1-C216S top2-191 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1026443	2540541	2539442	277068	276005	SPBC1A4.03c	SPCC5E4.04	top2	cut1	ptr11	ptr4	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Tapia-Alveal C (2014)	24687850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	Figure 1|cut1+ overexpression rescues growth of nse1-C216S top2-191 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1026444	2539550	2539442	276111	276005	SPCC550.05	SPCC5E4.04	nse1	cut1	-	ptr4	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tapia-Alveal C (2014)	24687850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:partial rescue	Figure 1|cut1+ overexpression rescues mitotic defects of nse1-C216S top2-191 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1026445	2540541	2539442	277068	276005	SPBC1A4.03c	SPCC5E4.04	top2	cut1	ptr11	ptr4	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tapia-Alveal C (2014)	24687850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:partial rescue	Figure 1|cut1+ overexpression rescues mitotic defects of nse1-C216S top2-191 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1026446	2539550	2539668	276111	276223	SPCC550.05	SPBC11B10.10c	nse1	pht1	-	pi001	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tapia-Alveal C (2014)	24687850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable:wild type	Figure 2|genetic complex|pht1 mutations bypass synthetic lethality of top2-191 nse1-C216S double mutant	-	BIOGRID
1026447	2540541	2539668	277068	276223	SPBC1A4.03c	SPBC11B10.10c	top2	pht1	ptr11	pi001	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tapia-Alveal C (2014)	24687850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable:wild type	Figure 2|genetic complex|pht1 mutations bypass synthetic lethality of top2-191 nse1-C216S double mutant|pht1 mutations bypass synthetic lethality of top2-191 smc6-74 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
1026448	2542925	2539668	279366	276223	SPAC11E3.04c	SPBC11B10.10c	ubc13	pht1	spu13|sst5	pi001	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tapia-Alveal C (2014)	24687850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 2|ubc13 pht1 double mutant shows increased MMS sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
1026461	2542275	2543336	278744	279759	SPAC17G8.04c	SPAC688.11	arc5	end4	arc15	sla2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Encinar Del Dedo J (2014)	25040903	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026462	2539659	2541480	276214	277982	SPBC146.13c	SPAC23D3.10c	myo1	eng2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Encinar Del Dedo J (2014)	25040903	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|ionic stress resistance|vegetative growth	0.8M KCl	-	BIOGRID
1026463	2542724	2541480	279175	277982	SPAC767.01c	SPAC23D3.10c	vps1	eng2	SPAC9G1.14c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Encinar Del Dedo J (2014)	25040903	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|ionic stress resistance|vegetative growth	0.8M KCl	-	BIOGRID
1026464	2540633	2541480	277159	277982	SPBC21D10.12	SPAC23D3.10c	hob1	eng2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Encinar Del Dedo J (2014)	25040903	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionic stress resistance	0.8M KCl	-	BIOGRID
1026465	2539945	2541480	276489	277982	SPBC119.05c	SPAC23D3.10c	SPBC119.05c	eng2	csh3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Encinar Del Dedo J (2014)	25040903	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026466	2539945	2541480	276489	277982	SPBC119.05c	SPAC23D3.10c	SPBC119.05c	eng2	csh3	-	Co-fractionation	physical	Encinar Del Dedo J (2014)	25040903	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026467	2541480	2539945	277982	276489	SPAC23D3.10c	SPBC119.05c	eng2	SPBC119.05c	-	csh3	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Encinar Del Dedo J (2014)	25040903	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	in EMM	-	BIOGRID
1026468	2541027	2538760	277542	275343	SPBC409.16c	SPCC970.01	saw1	rad16	SPBC409.16c	rad10|rad20|swi9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1026469	2541027	2540887	277542	277404	SPBC409.16c	SPBC4F6.15c	saw1	swi10	SPBC409.16c	rad23	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1026470	2541027	2540148	277542	276685	SPBC409.16c	SPBC16D10.04c	saw1	dna2	SPBC409.16c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1026471	2541027	2543407	277542	279829	SPBC409.16c	SPAC8F11.07c	saw1	cdc24	SPBC409.16c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1026472	2541027	2539073	277542	275645	SPBC409.16c	SPCC1322.02	saw1	pxd1	SPBC409.16c	SPCC1322.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1026473	2539073	2538760	275645	275343	SPCC1322.02	SPCC970.01	pxd1	rad16	SPCC1322.02	rad10|rad20|swi9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1026474	2539073	2540887	275645	277404	SPCC1322.02	SPBC4F6.15c	pxd1	swi10	SPCC1322.02	rad23	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1026475	2539073	2540148	275645	276685	SPCC1322.02	SPBC16D10.04c	pxd1	dna2	SPCC1322.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1026476	2539073	2543407	275645	279829	SPCC1322.02	SPAC8F11.07c	pxd1	cdc24	SPCC1322.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1026477	2539073	2541027	275645	277542	SPCC1322.02	SPBC409.16c	pxd1	saw1	SPCC1322.02	SPBC409.16c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1026478	2539073	2538760	275645	275343	SPCC1322.02	SPCC970.01	pxd1	rad16	SPCC1322.02	rad10|rad20|swi9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1026479	2539073	2543407	275645	279829	SPCC1322.02	SPAC8F11.07c	pxd1	cdc24	SPCC1322.02	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1026480	2538760	2543407	275343	279829	SPCC970.01	SPAC8F11.07c	rad16	cdc24	rad10|rad20|swi9	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1026481	2541027	2543407	277542	279829	SPBC409.16c	SPAC8F11.07c	saw1	cdc24	SPBC409.16c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1026482	2539073	2538760	275645	275343	SPCC1322.02	SPCC970.01	pxd1	rad16	SPCC1322.02	rad10|rad20|swi9	Two-hybrid	physical	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1026483	2539073	2540148	275645	276685	SPCC1322.02	SPBC16D10.04c	pxd1	dna2	SPCC1322.02	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1026485	2538760	2540887	275343	277404	SPCC970.01	SPBC4F6.15c	rad16	swi10	rad10|rad20|swi9	rad23	Two-hybrid	physical	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1026486	2543407	2540148	279829	276685	SPAC8F11.07c	SPBC16D10.04c	cdc24	dna2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1026487	2543407	2539073	279829	275645	SPAC8F11.07c	SPCC1322.02	cdc24	pxd1	-	SPCC1322.02	Two-hybrid	physical	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1026488	2538760	2539073	275343	275645	SPCC970.01	SPCC1322.02	rad16	pxd1	rad10|rad20|swi9	SPCC1322.02	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1026489	2538760	2540887	275343	277404	SPCC970.01	SPBC4F6.15c	rad16	swi10	rad10|rad20|swi9	rad23	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1026490	2543407	2539073	279829	275645	SPAC8F11.07c	SPCC1322.02	cdc24	pxd1	-	SPCC1322.02	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1026491	2543407	2540148	279829	276685	SPAC8F11.07c	SPBC16D10.04c	cdc24	dna2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S1	-	BIOGRID
1026492	2541120	2539073	277635	275645	SPBC649.03	SPCC1322.02	rhp14	pxd1	-	SPCC1322.02	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionizing radiation resistance|vegetative growth	Figure 2|pxd1 rhp14 double mutant has increased IR sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
1026493	2539073	2539579	275645	276138	SPCC1322.02	SPCP31B10.05	pxd1	tdp1	SPCC1322.02	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	Figure 4	-	BIOGRID
1026494	2539073	2540032	275645	276575	SPCC1322.02	SPBC1703.14c	pxd1	top1	SPCC1322.02	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable:wild type	Figure 4|genetic complex|top1 deletion bypasses synthetic lethality of pdx1 tdp1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
1026495	2539579	2540032	276138	276575	SPCP31B10.05	SPBC1703.14c	tdp1	top1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable:wild type	Figure 4|Figure S4|genetic complex|top1 deletion bypasses swi10 tdp1 synthetic lethality|top1 deletion bypasses synthetic lethality of pdx1 tdp1 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
1026496	2539214	2538763	275784	275346	SPCC1672.10	SPCC970.12	mis16	mis18	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2014)	24774534	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026497	2539214	2540369	275784	276898	SPCC1672.10	SPBC27B12.02	mis16	mis19	-	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2014)	24774534	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026498	2539214	2541134	275784	277649	SPCC1672.10	SPBC776.16	mis16	mis20	-	SPBC776.16|eic2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2014)	24774534	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026499	2539214	2542502	275784	278960	SPCC1672.10	SPAC139.06	mis16	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2014)	24774534	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026500	2538763	2539214	275346	275784	SPCC970.12	SPCC1672.10	mis18	mis16	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2014)	24774534	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026501	2538763	2540369	275346	276898	SPCC970.12	SPBC27B12.02	mis18	mis19	-	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2014)	24774534	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026502	2538763	2541134	275346	277649	SPCC970.12	SPBC776.16	mis18	mis20	-	SPBC776.16|eic2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2014)	24774534	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026503	2541134	2539214	277649	275784	SPBC776.16	SPCC1672.10	mis20	mis16	SPBC776.16|eic2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2014)	24774534	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026504	2541134	2538763	277649	275346	SPBC776.16	SPCC970.12	mis20	mis18	SPBC776.16|eic2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2014)	24774534	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026505	2541134	2540369	277649	276898	SPBC776.16	SPBC27B12.02	mis20	mis19	SPBC776.16|eic2	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2014)	24774534	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026506	2542502	2539214	278960	275784	SPAC139.06	SPCC1672.10	hat1	mis16	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hayashi T (2014)	24774534	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026507	2538760	2539073	275343	275645	SPCC970.01	SPCC1322.02	rad16	pxd1	rad10|rad20|swi9	SPCC1322.02	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 5	-	BIOGRID
1026508	2539073	2540148	275645	276685	SPCC1322.02	SPBC16D10.04c	pxd1	dna2	SPCC1322.02	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	Figure 6|dna2+ overexpression rescues growth defect caused by pdx1+ overexpression	-	BIOGRID
1026509	2540348	2539073	276877	275645	SPBC29A10.05	SPCC1322.02	exo1	pxd1	mut2	SPCC1322.02	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein activity:partial rescue	Figure 7|pdx1 deletion partially rescues resection defect in exo1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1026510	2540887	2539579	277404	276138	SPBC4F6.15c	SPCP31B10.05	swi10	tdp1	rad23	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	Figure S4	-	BIOGRID
1026511	2540887	2540032	277404	276575	SPBC4F6.15c	SPBC1703.14c	swi10	top1	rad23	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable:wild type	Figure S4|genetic complex|top1 deletion bypasses swi10 tdp1 synthetic lethality	-	BIOGRID
1026512	2539073	2541213	275645	277727	SPCC1322.02	SPBC887.14c	pxd1	pfh1	SPCC1322.02	pif1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Zhang JM (2014)	25203555	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	Figure S6|pfh1 mutation rescues growth defect caused by pxd1(227-351) overexpression	-	BIOGRID
1026513	2542502	2539214	278960	275784	SPAC139.06	SPCC1672.10	hat1	mis16	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Hayashi T (2014)	24774534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	low stringency only	-	BIOGRID
1026514	2539214	2542502	275784	278960	SPCC1672.10	SPAC139.06	mis16	hat1	-	SPAC23C4.01|kat1	Two-hybrid	physical	Hayashi T (2014)	24774534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	low stringency only	-	BIOGRID
1026515	2539214	2540369	275784	276898	SPCC1672.10	SPBC27B12.02	mis16	mis19	-	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	Two-hybrid	physical	Hayashi T (2014)	24774534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	high stringency	-	BIOGRID
1026516	2540369	2539214	276898	275784	SPBC27B12.02	SPCC1672.10	mis19	mis16	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Hayashi T (2014)	24774534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	high stringency	-	BIOGRID
1026517	2540369	2538763	276898	275346	SPBC27B12.02	SPCC970.12	mis19	mis18	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Hayashi T (2014)	24774534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	high stringency	-	BIOGRID
1026518	2538763	2538763	275346	275346	SPCC970.12	SPCC970.12	mis18	mis18	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Hayashi T (2014)	24774534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	high stringency	-	BIOGRID
1026519	2541134	2538763	277649	275346	SPBC776.16	SPCC970.12	mis20	mis18	SPBC776.16|eic2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Hayashi T (2014)	24774534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	high stringency	-	BIOGRID
1026520	2540635	2541975	277161	278460	SPBC23G7.08c	SPAC20G8.05c	rga7	cdc15	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Martin-Garcia R (2014)	25052092	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	Figure 5|rga7 cdc15-140 double mutant is synthetic lethal at 28 degrees	-	BIOGRID
1026521	2540635	2541975	277161	278460	SPBC23G7.08c	SPAC20G8.05c	rga7	cdc15	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Martin-Garcia R (2014)	25052092	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation	Figure 5|rga7 cdc15-140 double mutant has increased percentage of cells with un-complete septum	-	BIOGRID
1026522	2540635	2540112	277161	276649	SPBC23G7.08c	SPBC11C11.02	rga7	imp2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Martin-Garcia R (2014)	25052092	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	Figure 6|rga7 imp2 double mutant is synthetic lethal	-	BIOGRID
1026523	2540112	2540635	276649	277161	SPBC11C11.02	SPBC23G7.08c	imp2	rga7	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Martin-Garcia R (2014)	25052092	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	Figure 6|rga7+ overexpression partially suppresses growth defect of imp2 mutant at 36 degrees	-	BIOGRID
1026524	2540112	2540635	276649	277161	SPBC11C11.02	SPBC23G7.08c	imp2	rga7	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Martin-Garcia R (2014)	25052092	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 7	-	BIOGRID
1026525	2540635	2541203	277161	277717	SPBC23G7.08c	SPBC83.18c	rga7	fic1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Martin-Garcia R (2014)	25052092	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 7	-	BIOGRID
1026526	2540856	2540635	277373	277161	SPBC4F6.12	SPBC23G7.08c	pxl1	rga7	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Martin-Garcia R (2014)	25052092	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 7	-	BIOGRID
1026527	2538763	2542327	275346	278793	SPCC970.12	SPAC16C9.06c	mis18	upf1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Hayashi T (2014)	24774534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
1026528	2538763	2542147	275346	278623	SPCC970.12	SPAC19A8.08	mis18	upf2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Hayashi T (2014)	24774534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
1026529	2538763	2542908	275346	279352	SPCC970.12	SPAC13G7.03	mis18	upf3	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Hayashi T (2014)	24774534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
1026530	2538763	2540346	275346	276875	SPCC970.12	SPBC2F12.03c	mis18	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Hayashi T (2014)	24774534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
1026531	2538763	2538881	275346	275460	SPCC970.12	SPCC1620.14c	mis18	snf22	-	SPCC830.01c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Hayashi T (2014)	24774534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
1026532	2538763	2541801	275346	278292	SPCC970.12	SPAC2F7.08c	mis18	snf5	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Hayashi T (2014)	24774534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
1026533	2538763	2540318	275346	276848	SPCC970.12	SPBC30B4.04c	mis18	sol1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Hayashi T (2014)	24774534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
1026534	2540369	2542327	276898	278793	SPBC27B12.02	SPAC16C9.06c	mis19	upf1	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Hayashi T (2014)	24774534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
1026535	2540369	2542147	276898	278623	SPBC27B12.02	SPAC19A8.08	mis19	upf2	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Hayashi T (2014)	24774534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
1026536	2540369	2542908	276898	279352	SPBC27B12.02	SPAC13G7.03	mis19	upf3	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Hayashi T (2014)	24774534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
1026537	2540369	2540346	276898	276875	SPBC27B12.02	SPBC2F12.03c	mis19	ebs1	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	SPBC2F12.03c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Hayashi T (2014)	24774534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
1026538	2540369	2538881	276898	275460	SPBC27B12.02	SPCC1620.14c	mis19	snf22	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	SPCC830.01c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Hayashi T (2014)	24774534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
1026539	2540369	2541801	276898	278292	SPBC27B12.02	SPAC2F7.08c	mis19	snf5	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Hayashi T (2014)	24774534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
1026540	2540369	2540318	276898	276848	SPBC27B12.02	SPBC30B4.04c	mis19	sol1	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Hayashi T (2014)	24774534	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
1026541	2540281	2543382	276812	279804	SPBC2G2.14	SPAC890.02c	csi1	alp7	SPBC2G2.14	mia1	Two-hybrid	physical	Zheng F (2014)	25057016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1026542	2540281	2543382	276812	279804	SPBC2G2.14	SPAC890.02c	csi1	alp7	SPBC2G2.14	mia1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Zheng F (2014)	25057016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
1026543	2540281	2543382	276812	279804	SPBC2G2.14	SPAC890.02c	csi1	alp7	SPBC2G2.14	mia1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Zheng F (2014)	25057016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 1|cis1 alp7 double mutant has increased sensitivity to methyl benzimidazole-2-yl-carbamate	-	BIOGRID
1026576	9406964	9407128	1028327	1028491	SPCC70.12c	SPBP35G2.16c	ecl1	ecl2	SPNG2611|SPNCRNA.518	SPNGAF61	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ohtsuka H (2014)	25204792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating response	Figure 6|ecl1 ecl2 ecl3 triple mutant displays mating defect|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1026577	9407128	9407219	1028491	1028582	SPBP35G2.16c	SPBC8E4.12c	ecl2	ecl3	SPNGAF61	SPNG1995-96	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ohtsuka H (2014)	25204792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating response	Figure 6|ecl1 ecl2 ecl3 triple mutant displays mating defect|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1026578	9407219	9406964	1028582	1028327	SPBC8E4.12c	SPCC70.12c	ecl3	ecl1	SPNG1995-96	SPNG2611|SPNCRNA.518	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ohtsuka H (2014)	25204792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating response	Figure 6|ecl1 ecl2 ecl3 triple mutant displays mating defect|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1026579	2543467	2541900	279887	278390	SPAC688.08	SPAC23H4.17c	srb8	srb10	med12	cdk8|prk1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Banyai G (2014)	25154415	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:undetermined	Figure 7|cdk+ deletion suppresses early mitotic entry seen in med12 med13 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1026580	2542571	2541900	279027	278390	SPAC589.02c	SPAC23H4.17c	med13	srb10	spTrap240|srb9	cdk8|prk1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Banyai G (2014)	25154415	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:undetermined	Figure 7|cdk+ deletion suppresses early mitotic entry seen in med12 med13 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1026583	2542070	2542467	278547	278928	SPAC29B12.02c	SPAC1834.04	set2	hht1	kmt3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Suzuki S (2014)	24583182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026584	2542070	2541220	278547	277734	SPAC29B12.02c	SPBC8D2.04	set2	hht2	kmt3	h3.2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Suzuki S (2014)	24583182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026585	2542070	2539804	278547	276354	SPAC29B12.02c	SPBC1105.11c	set2	hht3	kmt3	h3.3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Suzuki S (2014)	24583182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026586	2542070	2540292	278547	276823	SPAC29B12.02c	SPBC28F2.12	set2	rpb1	kmt3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Suzuki S (2014)	24583182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026587	2542070	2541446	278547	277951	SPAC29B12.02c	SPAC23G3.01	set2	rpb2	kmt3	SPAC521.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Suzuki S (2014)	24583182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026588	2542070	2538816	278547	275397	SPAC29B12.02c	SPCC1442.10c	set2	rpb3	kmt3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Suzuki S (2014)	24583182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026589	2542070	2541011	278547	277526	SPAC29B12.02c	SPBC337.14	set2	rpb4	kmt3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Suzuki S (2014)	24583182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026590	2542070	2541910	278547	278400	SPAC29B12.02c	SPAC23C4.15	set2	rpb5	kmt3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Suzuki S (2014)	24583182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026591	2542070	2542097	278547	278573	SPAC29B12.02c	SPACUNK4.06c	set2	rpb7	kmt3	SPAPYUK71.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Suzuki S (2014)	24583182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026592	2542070	2542005	278547	278488	SPAC29B12.02c	SPAC23A1.16c	set2	rtr1	kmt3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Suzuki S (2014)	24583182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026599	2541620	2538736	278117	275320	SPAC2G11.12	SPCC1322.12c	rqh1	bub1	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakano A (2014)	24469396	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type	Figure 1|bub1 deletion suppresses cell cycle arrest in pot1 rqh1-hd double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1026600	2542703	2538736	279156	275320	SPAC26H5.06	SPCC1322.12c	pot1	bub1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakano A (2014)	24469396	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type	Figure 1|bub1 deletion suppresses cell cycle arrest in pot1 rqh1-hd double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1026601	2541620	2540589	278117	277115	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC20F10.06	rqh1	mad2	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakano A (2014)	24469396	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type	Figure 1|genetic complex|mad2 deletion suppresses cell cycle arrest in pot1 rqh1-hd double mutant	-	BIOGRID
1026602	2542703	2540589	279156	277115	SPAC26H5.06	SPBC20F10.06	pot1	mad2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakano A (2014)	24469396	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type	Figure 1|genetic complex|mad2 deletion suppresses cell cycle arrest in pot1 rqh1-hd double mutant	-	BIOGRID
1026604	2538736	2542703	275320	279156	SPCC1322.12c	SPAC26H5.06	bub1	pot1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakano A (2014)	24469396	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 3|bub1 pot1 double mutant has increased sensitivity to TBZ (rqh1-hd background)	-	BIOGRID
1026605	2540589	2542703	277115	279156	SPBC20F10.06	SPAC26H5.06	mad2	pot1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakano A (2014)	24469396	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 3|mad2 pot1 double mutant has increased sensitivity to TBZ (rqh1-hd background)	-	BIOGRID
1026606	2541620	2539087	278117	275659	SPAC2G11.12	SPCC1259.13	rqh1	chk1	hus2|rad12|rec9	rad27	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nakano A (2014)	24469396	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	Figure 4|chk1 deletion suppresses growth defect on TBZ of pot1 rqh1-hd double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1026607	2542703	2539087	279156	275659	SPAC26H5.06	SPCC1259.13	pot1	chk1	-	rad27	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nakano A (2014)	24469396	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	Figure 4|chk1 deletion suppresses growth defect on TBZ of pot1 rqh1-hd double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1026610	2541620	2539087	278117	275659	SPAC2G11.12	SPCC1259.13	rqh1	chk1	hus2|rad12|rec9	rad27	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakano A (2014)	24469396	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:undetermined|chromosome/plasmid maintenance:undetermined	Figure 4|chk1 deletion suppresses defects in telomere recombination and cell cycle arrest in pot1 rqh1-hd double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1026611	2542703	2539087	279156	275659	SPAC26H5.06	SPCC1259.13	pot1	chk1	-	rad27	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakano A (2014)	24469396	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:undetermined|chromosome/plasmid maintenance:undetermined	Figure 4|chk1 deletion suppresses defects in telomere recombination and cell cycle arrest in pot1 rqh1-hd double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1026612	2541620	2538736	278117	275320	SPAC2G11.12	SPCC1322.12c	rqh1	bub1	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nakano A (2014)	24469396	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 6|rqh1-hd bub1 double mutant is synthetic sick on HU	-	BIOGRID
1026613	2542679	2543390	279132	279812	SPAC12B10.07	SPAC631.01c	acp1	acp2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Berro J (2014)	25143407	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	endocytosis	acp1 acp2 double mutant have more severe defects in endocytic patch movement	-	BIOGRID
1026614	2542795	2542679	279243	279132	SPAC9G1.05	SPAC12B10.07	aip1	acp1	SPAC9G1.05	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Berro J (2014)	25143407	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
1026615	2542795	2543390	279243	279812	SPAC9G1.05	SPAC631.01c	aip1	acp2	SPAC9G1.05	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Berro J (2014)	25143407	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
1026616	2542795	2542679	279243	279132	SPAC9G1.05	SPAC12B10.07	aip1	acp1	SPAC9G1.05	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Berro J (2014)	25143407	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	endocytosis	acp1 aip1 double mutant have more severe defects in endocytic patch movement	-	BIOGRID
1026619	2543675	2543513	280089	279931	SPAC4D7.10c	SPAC821.06	spt20	spn2	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Lei B (2014)	25015293	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 4	-	BIOGRID
1026620	2543675	2542683	280089	279136	SPAC4D7.10c	SPAPYUG7.03c	spt20	mid2	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Lei B (2014)	25015293	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 4	-	BIOGRID
1026621	2543516	2543675	279934	280089	SPAC4F10.11	SPAC4D7.10c	spn1	spt20	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lei B (2014)	25015293	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 4	-	BIOGRID
1026622	2543513	2543675	279931	280089	SPAC821.06	SPAC4D7.10c	spn2	spt20	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lei B (2014)	25015293	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 4	-	BIOGRID
1026623	2540029	2543675	276573	280089	SPBC16A3.01	SPAC4D7.10c	spn3	spt20	SPBC543.01c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lei B (2014)	25015293	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 4	-	BIOGRID
1026624	2542193	2543675	278668	280089	SPAC9G1.11c	SPAC4D7.10c	spn4	spt20	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lei B (2014)	25015293	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 4	-	BIOGRID
1026625	2542683	2543675	279136	280089	SPAPYUG7.03c	SPAC4D7.10c	mid2	spt20	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lei B (2014)	25015293	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 4	-	BIOGRID
1026626	2543513	2543675	279931	280089	SPAC821.06	SPAC4D7.10c	spn2	spt20	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lei B (2014)	25015293	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation	Figure 6|spt20+ overexpression causes defect in septin ring assembly in spn2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1026628	2542683	2543675	279136	280089	SPAPYUG7.03c	SPAC4D7.10c	mid2	spt20	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Lei B (2014)	25015293	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 8	-	BIOGRID
1026629	2542683	2543513	279136	279931	SPAPYUG7.03c	SPAC821.06	mid2	spn2	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Lei B (2014)	25015293	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 8	-	BIOGRID
1026630	2542503	2540639	278961	277164	SPAC19A8.12	SPBC18E5.11c	dcp2	edc3	-	SPBC23G7.01c	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Fromm SA (2014)	24862735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026631	5802967	2540639	858105	277164	SPAC20G4.08	SPBC18E5.11c	pdc1	edc3	SPAC20G4.08|SPAC4F10.01	SPBC23G7.01c	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Fromm SA (2014)	24862735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1026632	2542207	2542696	278682	279149	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC29B12.03	ddb1	spd1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Vejrup-Hansen R (2014)	24652833	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue|vegetative growth:wild type	Figure 5|Figure 7|genetic complex|spd1 deletion rescues HU sensitivity of ddb1 mutant|spd1 deletion rescues MMS sensitivity of ddb1 mutant|spd1 deletion rescues growth defect in ddb1 mutant (rad3-TS background)|spd1 spd2 double deletion rescues HU sensitivity of ddb1 mutant|spd1 spd2 double deletion rescues growth defect in ddb1 mutant (rad3-TS background)	-	BIOGRID
1026634	2540381	2541695	276910	278191	SPBC25D12.04	SPAC1F7.05	suc22	cdc22	-	-	FRET	physical	Vejrup-Hansen R (2014)	24652833	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 6	-	BIOGRID
1026635	2542207	2542696	278682	279149	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC29B12.03	ddb1	spd1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Vejrup-Hansen R (2014)	24652833	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:wild type	Figure 7|spd1 deletion rescues sporulation defects in ddb1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1026636	2542374	2542696	278838	279149	SPAC17H9.19c	SPAC29B12.03	cdt2	spd1	sev1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Vejrup-Hansen R (2014)	24652833	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:wild type	Figure 7|spd1 deletion rescues sporulation defects in cdt2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1026637	2540352	2542696	276881	279149	SPBC215.03c	SPAC29B12.03	csn1	spd1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Vejrup-Hansen R (2014)	24652833	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:wild type	Figure 7|spd1 deletion rescues sporulation defects in csn1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1026641	2540352	2542696	276881	279149	SPBC215.03c	SPAC29B12.03	csn1	spd1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Vejrup-Hansen R (2014)	24652833	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	Figure 7|genetic complex|spd1 deletion rescues growth defect in csn1 mutant (rad3-TS background)|spd1 spd2 double deletion rescues growth defect in csn1 mutant (rad3-TS background)	-	BIOGRID
1026643	2542207	2541695	278682	278191	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC1F7.05	ddb1	cdc22	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Vejrup-Hansen R (2014)	24652833	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:wild type	Figure 8|genetic complex|spd2 cdc22-D57N double mutation suppresses sporulation defect in ddb1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1026644	2542207	2541695	278682	278191	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC1F7.05	ddb1	cdc22	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Vejrup-Hansen R (2014)	24652833	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:undetermined	Figure 8|genetic complex|spd2 cdc22-D57N double mutation rescues growth defect of ddb1 mutant (rad3-TS background)	-	BIOGRID
1026691	2543254	2539660	279682	276215	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC115.01c	red1	rrp46	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	70.79646018	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026692	2543254	2540855	279682	277372	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC4B4.05	red1	smg1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	64.93506494	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026693	2543254	2540479	279682	277007	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC2D10.10c	red1	fib1	iss3	fib|nop1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	62.29508197	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026694	2543254	2542480	279682	278940	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC2C4.03c	red1	smd2	iss3	cwf9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	60.86956522	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026695	2543254	2541099	279682	277614	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC646.04	red1	pla1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	60.07067138	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026696	2543254	2541062	279682	277577	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC660.11	red1	tcg1	iss3	mug187	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	54.59770115	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026697	2543254	2542369	279682	278833	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC1782.10c	red1	nhp2	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	51.94805195	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026698	2543254	2539106	279682	275678	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC757.08	red1	rrp45	iss3	SPCC757.08	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	51.54639175	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026699	2543254	2542015	279682	278498	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC2G11.15c	red1	tgs1	iss3	SPAC521.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	46.0251046	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026700	2543254	2543630	279682	280044	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC1F3.01	red1	rrp6	iss3	SPAC3H8.11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	45.04504505	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026701	2543254	2541519	279682	278020	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC227.07c	red1	pab1	iss3	ret1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	42.87901991	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026702	2543254	2540412	279682	276940	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC211.08c	red1	mtr3	iss3	SPBC211.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	42.80155642	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026703	2543254	2539733	279682	276285	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC16E9.12c	red1	pab2	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	42.1686747	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026704	2543254	2540884	279682	277401	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC19C2.14	red1	smd3	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	41.2371134	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026705	2543254	2541087	279682	277602	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC646.10c	red1	SPBC646.10c	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	40.24144869	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026706	2543254	2542663	279682	279116	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC607.03c	red1	snu13	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	40.0	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026707	2543254	2543227	279682	279655	SPAC1006.03c	SPAPB8E5.09	red1	rvb1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	39.47368421	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026708	2543254	2542256	279682	278726	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC29A4.08c	red1	prp19	iss3	cwf8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	38.93442623	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026709	2543254	2539607	279682	276165	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC11G11.06c	red1	sme1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	35.71428571	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026710	2543254	2541077	279682	277592	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC83.08	red1	rvb2	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	34.40860215	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026711	2543254	2541635	279682	278131	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC1556.01c	red1	rad50	iss3	SPAP4C9.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	34.24124514	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026712	2543254	2542690	279682	279143	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC27D7.07c	red1	smd1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	34.18803419	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026713	2543254	2539730	279682	276282	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC1861.08c	red1	lea1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	33.47280335	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026714	2543254	2541837	279682	278328	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC22A12.12c	red1	rrp40	iss3	SPAC22A12.12c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	33.33333333	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026715	2543254	2543112	279682	279544	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC3A12.07	red1	rpb11	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	32.5203252	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026716	2543254	2542799	279682	279247	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC1687.01	red1	rpc19	iss3	SPAPYUL23.01|rpa17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	32.0	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026717	2543254	2542214	279682	278688	SPAC1006.03c	SPACUNK4.11c	red1	mpp6	iss3	SPACUNK4.11c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	31.91489362	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026718	2543254	2543087	279682	279520	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC30C2.04	red1	SPAC30C2.04	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	31.11111111	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026719	2543254	2539869	279682	276415	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC11B10.09	red1	cdc2	iss3	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	30.3030303	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026720	2543254	2542443	279682	278905	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC17G6.13	red1	slt1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	30.02309469	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026721	2543254	2540189	279682	276722	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC17D1.03c	red1	rrp43	iss3	SPBC17D1.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	29.62962963	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026722	2543254	2542463	279682	278924	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC1834.03c	red1	hhf1	iss3	h4.1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	29.12621359	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026723	2543254	2538901	279682	275479	SPAC1006.03c	SPCP1E11.07c	red1	cwf18	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	28.16901408	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026724	2543254	2543631	279682	280045	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC458.02c	red1	SPAC458.02c	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	27.77777778	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026725	2543254	2539351	279682	275917	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC1840.11	red1	csl4	iss3	SPCC965.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	27.62430939	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026726	2543254	2541814	279682	278305	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC23G3.06	red1	SPAC23G3.06	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	27.55905512	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026727	2543254	2541813	279682	278304	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC2F7.14c	red1	rrp4	iss3	SPAC2F7.14c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	27.3556231	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026728	2543254	2542684	279682	279137	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC26A3.08	red1	smb1	iss3	smb	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	27.21088435	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026729	2543254	2538863	279682	275443	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC1682.03c	red1	mug174	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	27.15654952	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026730	2543254	2541219	279682	277733	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC8D2.09c	red1	msl1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	27.02702703	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026731	2543254	2540585	279682	277111	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC28F2.04c	red1	cwf7	iss3	spf27	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	26.73796791	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026732	2543254	2539540	279682	276102	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC736.12c	red1	mmi1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	26.63934426	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026733	2543254	2542764	279682	279214	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC15E1.10	red1	SPAC15E1.10	iss3	SPAP7G5.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	26.41509434	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026734	2543254	2542507	279682	278965	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC18G6.13	red1	SPAC18G6.13	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	26.31578947	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026735	2543254	2540705	279682	277228	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC20F10.01	red1	gar1	iss3	SPBC25H2.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	25.77319588	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026736	2543254	2542481	279682	278941	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC29A4.04c	red1	cbf5	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	25.3164557	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026737	2543254	2538689	279682	275274	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC1795.11	red1	sum3	iss3	ded1|moc2|slh3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	25.1572327	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026738	2543254	2540565	279682	277092	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC1D7.04	red1	mlo3	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	25.12562814	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026739	2543254	2540723	279682	277246	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC20F10.09	red1	lsm5	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	25.0	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026740	2543254	2540912	279682	277428	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC557.02c	red1	SPBC557.02c	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	24.63054187	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026741	2543254	2542126	279682	278602	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC1B3.05	red1	not3	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	23.80952381	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026742	2543254	2540149	279682	276686	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC1289.03c	red1	spi1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	23.14814815	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026743	2543254	2539499	279682	276062	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC622.08c	red1	hta1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	22.72727273	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026744	2543254	2542564	279682	279020	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC1851.03	red1	ckb1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	21.64502165	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026745	2543254	2539743	279682	276295	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC16A3.08c	red1	oga1	iss3	SPBC16A3.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	21.12676056	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026746	2543254	2542325	279682	278791	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC16C9.04c	red1	mot2	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	20.44989775	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026747	2543254	2543686	279682	280100	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC3C7.14c	red1	obr1	iss3	apt1|uhp1|p25	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	19.8019802	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026748	2543254	2538974	279682	275548	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC550.02c	red1	cwf5	iss3	ecm2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	19.7740113	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026749	2543254	2540368	279682	276897	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC36.05c	red1	clr6	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	19.75308642	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026750	2543254	2540306	279682	276836	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC2G5.02c	red1	ckb2	iss3	SPBC2G5.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	19.68503937	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026751	2543254	2541054	279682	277569	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC3B8.08	red1	SPBC3B8.08	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	19.60784314	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026752	2543254	2541910	279682	278400	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC23C4.15	red1	rpb5	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	19.04761905	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026753	2543254	3361260	279682	280336	SPAC1006.03c	SPBP22H7.07	red1	prp5	iss3	cwf1|pi024|SPACTOKYO_453.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	19.02748414	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026754	2543254	2538872	279682	275451	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC737.04	red1	SPCC737.04	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	19.0023753	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026755	2543254	2538913	279682	275490	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC31H12.08c	red1	ccr4	iss3	SPCC5E4.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	18.84057971	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026756	2543254	2540398	279682	276926	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC26H8.10	red1	dis3	iss3	rrp44	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	18.55670103	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026757	2543254	2542744	279682	279194	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC1565.08	red1	cdc48	iss3	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	18.40490798	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026758	2543254	2541972	279682	278457	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC23C11.11	red1	cka1	iss3	orb5	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	18.07228916	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026759	2543254	2542531	279682	278989	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC3A12.11c	red1	cwf2	iss3	prp3|cwc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	18.04123711	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026760	2543254	2542475	279682	278935	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC1F12.02c	red1	SPAC1F12.02c	iss3	p23fy	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	17.85714286	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026761	2543254	2540753	279682	277274	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC211.02c	red1	cwf3	iss3	syf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	17.72151899	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026762	2543254	2538964	279682	275538	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC285.12	red1	lsm7	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	17.69911504	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026763	2543254	2540258	279682	276789	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC32C12.02	red1	ste11	iss3	aff1|stex	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	17.09401709	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026764	2543254	2538778	279682	275359	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC4G3.15c	red1	not2	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	17.04545455	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026765	2543254	2540743	279682	277266	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC215.06c	red1	SPBC215.06c	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.85393258	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026766	2543254	2538906	279682	275483	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC1259.03	red1	rpa12	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.80672269	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026767	2543254	2543541	279682	279958	SPAC1006.03c	SPAPB24D3.07c	red1	SPAPB24D3.07c	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.66666667	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026768	2543254	2540711	279682	277234	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC215.12	red1	cwf10	iss3	snu114|spef2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.27670397	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026769	2543254	2540086	279682	276624	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC16H5.12c	red1	SPBC16H5.12c	iss3	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.12903226	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026770	2543254	2539794	279682	276344	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC14C8.12	red1	rpb8	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.0	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026771	2543254	2539699	279682	276252	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC11G11.05	red1	rpa34	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	15.93625498	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026772	2543254	2539285	279682	275853	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC1672.02c	red1	sap1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	15.7480315	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026773	2543254	2542948	279682	279388	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC1006.07	red1	SPAC1006.07	iss3	tif1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	15.30612245	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026774	2543254	2541975	279682	278460	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC20G8.05c	red1	cdc15	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	15.10248112	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026775	2543254	2542121	279682	278597	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC17H9.05	red1	ebp2	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	15.01501502	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026776	2543254	2541612	279682	278109	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC1F7.04	red1	rho1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.85148515	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026777	2543254	2541487	279682	277989	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC23D3.08	red1	usp108	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.83679525	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026778	2543254	2539784	279682	276334	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC1703.10	red1	ypt1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.77832512	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026779	2543254	2541645	279682	278141	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC1527.03	red1	SPAC1527.03	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.73684211	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026780	2543254	2543676	279682	280090	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC9.03c	red1	brr2	iss3	spp41	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.70588235	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026781	2543254	2539389	279682	275954	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC1827.05c	red1	SPCC1827.05c	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.49275362	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026782	2543254	2538888	279682	275466	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC1322.16	red1	phb2	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.33691756	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026783	2543254	2542001	279682	278485	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC20G8.06	red1	not1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.28571429	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026784	2543254	2540966	279682	277482	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC3D6.09	red1	dpb4	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.28571429	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026785	2543254	2540230	279682	276762	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC32F12.05c	red1	cwf12	iss3	isy1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	13.82488479	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026786	2543254	2540980	279682	277496	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC342.04	red1	rpn1301	iss3	rpn13|rpn13a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	13.74570447	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026787	2543254	2540434	279682	276962	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC24C6.11	red1	cwf14	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	13.69863014	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026788	2543254	3361177	279682	280253	SPAC1006.03c	SPBPB21E7.07	red1	aes1	iss3	SPAPB21E7.07	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	13.51351351	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026789	2543254	2542795	279682	279243	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC9G1.05	red1	aip1	iss3	SPAC9G1.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	13.44537815	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026790	2543254	2540611	279682	277137	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC3E7.13c	red1	syf2	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	13.10043668	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026791	2543254	2539928	279682	276472	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC1604.08c	red1	imp1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.98701299	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026792	2543254	3361396	279682	280472	SPAC1006.03c	SPAPB17E12.11	red1	SPAPB17E12.11	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.94498382	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026793	2543254	2540337	279682	276866	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC28F2.11	red1	hmo1	iss3	SPBC28F2.11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.90322581	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026794	2543254	2539538	279682	276100	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC364.06	red1	nap1	iss3	nap11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.72264631	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026795	2543254	2543209	279682	279638	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC3G6.03c	red1	SPAC3G6.03c	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.71186441	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026796	2543254	2542520	279682	278978	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC20G8.09c	red1	nat10	iss3	SPAC20G8.09c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.58470474	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026797	2543254	2541168	279682	277683	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC6B1.10	red1	prp17	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.54480287	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026798	2543254	2543451	279682	279871	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC3G9.10c	red1	rrp41	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.39669421	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026799	2543254	2541600	279682	278097	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC6F12.17	red1	rna14	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.27830832	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026800	2543254	2540213	279682	276746	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC17D1.06	red1	dbp3	iss3	SPCC17D1.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.11072664	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026801	2543254	2539806	279682	276356	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC1711.08	red1	aha1	iss3	SPBC1711.08	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.9047619	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026802	2543254	2543089	279682	279522	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC12G12.14c	red1	pfs2	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.78781925	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026803	2543254	2541908	279682	278398	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC23D3.02	red1	rfc2	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.76470588	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026804	2543254	2542047	279682	278528	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC21E11.03c	red1	pcr1	iss3	mts2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.69590643	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026805	2543254	2539968	279682	276512	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC16E9.10c	red1	SPBC16E9.10c	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.55327343	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026806	2543254	2539663	279682	276218	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC1289.07c	red1	rpc40	iss3	rpa42	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.49425287	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026807	2543254	2541652	279682	278148	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC24B11.06c	red1	sty1	iss3	phh1|spc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.46131805	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026808	2543254	2538897	279682	275475	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC1183.07	red1	SPCC1183.07	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.24260355	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026809	2543254	2539932	279682	276476	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC13E7.07	red1	SPBC13E7.07	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.98901099	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026810	2543254	2539791	279682	276341	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC13A2.01c	red1	cbc2	iss3	SPBC13A2.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.98901099	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026811	2543254	2541289	279682	277802	SPAC1006.03c	SPBP35G2.09	red1	usp103	iss3	yhc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.98901099	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026812	2543254	2540328	279682	276858	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC31F10.11c	red1	cwf4	iss3	syf3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.38575668	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026813	2543254	2542556	279682	279013	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC6G10.07	red1	cbc1	iss3	SPAC6G10.07	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.25641026	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026814	2543254	2538816	279682	275397	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC1442.10c	red1	rpb3	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.1010101	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026815	2543254	2540524	279682	277052	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC21B10.08c	red1	SPBC21B10.08c	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.1010101	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026816	2543254	2540116	279682	276653	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC16G5.10	red1	rrp42	iss3	SPBC16G5.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.03344482	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026817	2543254	2541609	279682	278106	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC22F8.10c	red1	sap145	iss3	SF3b145	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.983361065	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026818	2543254	2541944	279682	278431	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC222.06	red1	mak16	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.933774834	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026819	2543254	2543079	279682	279512	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC343.04c	red1	SPAC343.04c	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.861932939	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026820	2543254	3361269	279682	280345	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC31A8.01c	red1	rtn1	iss3	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.74025974	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026821	2543254	2542964	279682	279404	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC12G12.07c	red1	SPAC12G12.07c	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.708737864	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026822	2543254	2540645	279682	277170	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC21B10.05c	red1	pop3	iss3	wat1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.554140127	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026823	2543254	2540057	279682	276595	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC16H5.10c	red1	prp43	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.523809524	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026824	2543254	2543500	279682	279918	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC926.08c	red1	SPAC926.08c	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.463722397	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026825	2543254	2541126	279682	277641	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC651.01c	red1	nog1	iss3	SPBC725.18c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.345794393	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026826	2543254	2542496	279682	278955	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC1B1.03c	red1	kap95	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.269988413	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026827	2543254	2543583	279682	279998	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC644.12	red1	cdc5	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.247027741	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026828	2543254	2541364	279682	277875	SPAC1006.03c	SPBP8B7.11	red1	nxt3	iss3	glp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.216589862	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026829	2543254	2541193	279682	277707	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC776.02c	red1	dis2	iss3	bws1|sds1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.174311927	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026830	2543254	2543491	279682	279911	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC683.02c	red1	SPAC683.02c	iss3	SPAC694.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.174311927	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026831	2543254	2543549	279682	279966	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC890.04c	red1	SPAC890.04c	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.090909091	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026832	2543254	2539984	279682	276528	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC1289.11	red1	spf38	iss3	cwf17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.823529412	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026833	2543254	2539305	279682	275873	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC613.07	red1	SPCC613.07	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.695652174	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026834	2543254	2543409	279682	279831	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC4D7.13	red1	usp104	iss3	prp40	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.633093525	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026835	2543254	2541124	279682	277639	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC646.02	red1	cwf11	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.566978193	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026836	2543254	2539994	279682	276538	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC1105.06	red1	pmc4	iss3	med4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.368200837	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026837	2543254	2543438	279682	279858	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC8F11.04	red1	SPAC8F11.04	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.042895442	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026838	2543254	2542134	279682	278610	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC18G6.06	red1	SPAC18G6.06	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.032128514	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026839	2543254	2542244	279682	278714	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC19G12.13c	red1	poz1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.032128514	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026840	2543254	2541817	279682	278308	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC23H4.09	red1	cdb4	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.874015748	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026841	2543254	2538848	279682	275429	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC613.12c	red1	raf1	iss3	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.836990596	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026842	2543254	2539425	279682	275990	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC550.14	red1	vgl1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.818608288	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026843	2543254	2540926	279682	277442	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC359.06	red1	mug14	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.782101167	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026844	2543254	2541863	279682	278353	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC22E12.07	red1	rna1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.772020725	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026845	2543254	2540220	279682	276753	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC337.03	red1	rhn1	iss3	SPBC337.03|iss4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.751937984	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026846	2543254	2540203	279682	276736	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC1604.09c	red1	SPBC1604.09c	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.692307692	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026847	2543254	2542461	279682	278922	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC19A8.13	red1	usp101	iss3	snp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.662835249	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026848	2543254	2542400	279682	278864	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC17G6.10	red1	ssr1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.590132827	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026849	2543254	2539055	279682	275628	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC16A11.13	red1	luc7	iss3	usp106	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.575757576	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026850	2543254	2541755	279682	278249	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC2F7.11	red1	nrd1	iss3	msa2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.561436673	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026851	2543254	2542246	279682	278716	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC17H9.12c	red1	SPAC17H9.12c	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.518796992	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026852	2543254	2542165	279682	278641	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC1782.08c	red1	rex3	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.407407407	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026853	2543254	2543413	279682	279835	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC4F8.12c	red1	spp42	iss3	cwf6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.194244604	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026854	2543254	2538988	279682	275562	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC188.11	red1	prp45	iss3	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.181328546	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026855	2543254	2542094	279682	278571	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC29B12.06c	red1	rcd1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.067137809	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026856	2543254	2541914	279682	278404	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC2F3.03c	red1	rpa49	iss3	rpa51	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.058823529	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026857	2543254	2539366	279682	275932	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC16C4.11	red1	pef1	iss3	p31	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.944444444	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026858	2543254	2540543	279682	277070	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC29A10.06c	red1	ely5	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.779661017	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026859	2543254	2541619	279682	278116	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC27F1.09c	red1	prp10	iss3	sap155|SF3b155	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.734006734	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026860	2543254	2541654	279682	278150	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC22G7.05	red1	kri1	iss3	SPAC22G7.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.688963211	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026861	2543254	2539299	279682	275867	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC1672.07	red1	SPCC1672.07	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.651884701	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026862	2543254	2543278	279682	279706	SPAC1006.03c	SPAPJ698.03c	red1	prp12	iss3	sap130|SF3b130	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.633499171	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026863	2543254	2541907	279682	278397	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC22H10.05c	red1	SPAC22H10.05c	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.578947368	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026864	2543254	2540643	279682	277168	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC19G7.06	red1	mbx1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.564551422	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026865	2543254	2540869	279682	277386	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC4B4.09	red1	usp105	iss3	prp39	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.535947712	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026866	2543254	2542336	279682	278802	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC16E8.11c	red1	tfb1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.289308176	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026867	2543254	2542910	279682	279353	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC1486.03c	red1	SPAC1486.03c	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.273525721	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026868	2543254	2541437	279682	277942	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC22A12.09c	red1	sap114	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.237006237	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026869	2543254	2540880	279682	277397	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC582.03	red1	cdc13	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.22406639	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026870	2543254	2539041	279682	275614	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC18.06c	red1	caf1	iss3	pop2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.024096386	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026871	2543254	2542691	279682	279144	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC26H5.07c	red1	SPAC26H5.07c	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.940594059	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026872	2543254	2540873	279682	277390	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC4C3.05c	red1	nuc1	iss3	rpa1|rpa190	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.920663114	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026873	2543254	2541700	279682	278196	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC32A11.02c	red1	SPAC32A11.02c	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.875440658	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026874	2543254	2542665	279682	279118	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC10F6.08c	red1	nht10	iss3	nht1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.865102639	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026875	2543254	2541088	279682	277603	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC609.05	red1	pob3	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.859375	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026876	2543254	2541493	279682	277995	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC27E2.10c	red1	rfc3	iss3	SPAPJ698.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.847953216	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026877	2543254	2542790	279682	279239	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC1687.03c	red1	rfc4	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.847953216	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026878	2543254	2543484	279682	279904	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC959.03c	red1	SPAC959.03c	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.769230769	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026879	2543254	2541540	279682	278040	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC1071.06	red1	arp9	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.736137667	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026880	2543254	2540215	279682	276748	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC83.14c	red1	rfc5	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.586592179	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026881	2543254	2540627	279682	277153	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC25H2.13c	red1	cdc20	iss3	pol2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.457025921	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026882	2543254	2542965	279682	279405	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC3G6.04	red1	rnp24	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.420054201	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026883	2543254	2541354	279682	277865	SPAC1006.03c	SPBPB7E8.02	red1	SPBPB7E8.02	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.340453939	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026884	2543254	2542880	279682	279325	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC6F12.14	red1	cut23	iss3	apc8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.309734513	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026885	2543254	2539809	279682	276359	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC16E9.02c	red1	SPBC16E9.02c	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.272407733	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026886	2543254	2543333	279682	279756	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC694.02	red1	SPAC694.02	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.241700641	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026887	2543254	2541471	279682	277973	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC1F5.03c	red1	SPAC1F5.03c	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.235602094	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026888	2543254	2539333	279682	275899	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC1902.02	red1	mug72	iss3	SPCC663.16c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.226480836	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026889	2543254	2540440	279682	276968	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC646.12c	red1	gap1	iss3	sar1|src1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.221932115	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026890	2543254	2539816	279682	276366	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC12C2.04	red1	SPBC12C2.04	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.208333333	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026891	2543254	2540930	279682	277446	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC354.10	red1	def1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.192107996	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026892	2543254	2541668	279682	278164	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC1F7.02c	red1	has1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.190311419	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026893	2543254	2541440	279682	277945	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC1565.05	red1	utp8	iss3	SPAC1565.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.174644243	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026894	2543254	2541280	279682	277793	SPAC1006.03c	SPBP23A10.07	red1	rpa2	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.110732538	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026895	2543254	2541434	279682	277939	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC27E2.03c	red1	SPAC27E2.03c	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.102040816	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026896	2543254	2541353	279682	277864	SPAC1006.03c	SPBP35G2.11c	red1	SPBP35G2.11c	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.037783375	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026897	2543254	2542715	279682	279168	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC25H1.08c	red1	SPAC25H1.08c	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.012531328	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC1006.03c	-	BIOGRID
1026898	2542173	2543254	278648	279682	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC1006.03c	mtl1	red1	SPAC17H9.02	iss3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	310.9243697	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026899	2542173	2539733	278648	276285	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC16E9.12c	mtl1	pab2	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	162.6506024	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026900	2542173	2542636	278648	279090	SPAC17H9.02	SPAP27G11.13c	mtl1	nop10	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	156.25	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026901	2542173	2541655	278648	278151	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC7D4.14c	mtl1	iss10	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	139.7459165	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026902	2542173	2540855	278648	277372	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC4B4.05	mtl1	smg1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	129.8701299	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026903	2542173	2540330	278648	276860	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC3E7.14	mtl1	smf1	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC4F6.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	102.5641026	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026904	2542173	2541143	278648	277658	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC725.08	mtl1	pir2	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC725.08|ars2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	95.23809524	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026905	2542173	2542369	278648	278833	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC1782.10c	mtl1	nhp2	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	90.90909091	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026906	2542173	2541519	278648	278020	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC227.07c	mtl1	pab1	SPAC17H9.02	ret1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	90.35222052	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026907	2542173	2540291	278648	276822	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC337.12	mtl1	red5	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC337.12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	87.5331565	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026908	2542173	2542480	278648	278940	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC2C4.03c	mtl1	smd2	SPAC17H9.02	cwf9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	78.26086957	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026909	2542173	2540479	278648	277007	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC2D10.10c	mtl1	fib1	SPAC17H9.02	fib|nop1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	75.40983607	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026910	2542173	2538901	278648	275479	SPAC17H9.02	SPCP1E11.07c	mtl1	cwf18	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	70.42253521	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026911	2542173	2540585	278648	277111	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC28F2.04c	mtl1	cwf7	SPAC17H9.02	spf27	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	69.51871658	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026912	2542173	2542015	278648	278498	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC2G11.15c	mtl1	tgs1	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC521.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	66.94560669	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026913	2542173	2542837	278648	279283	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC140.04	mtl1	ctr1	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC140.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	64.40677966	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026914	2542173	2541099	278648	277614	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC646.04	mtl1	pla1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	61.83745583	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026915	2542173	2540691	278648	277216	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC20F10.05	mtl1	nrl1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	60.69958848	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026916	2542173	2541087	278648	277602	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC646.10c	mtl1	SPBC646.10c	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	60.36217304	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026917	2542173	2543112	278648	279544	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC3A12.07	mtl1	rpb11	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	56.91056911	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026918	2542173	2542256	278648	278726	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC29A4.08c	mtl1	prp19	SPAC17H9.02	cwf8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	55.32786885	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026919	2542173	2541062	278648	277577	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC660.11	mtl1	tcg1	SPAC17H9.02	mug187	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	54.59770115	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026920	2542173	2539730	278648	276282	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC1861.08c	mtl1	lea1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	54.39330544	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026921	2542173	2539105	278648	275677	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC1739.07	mtl1	cti1	SPAC17H9.02	lrp1|rrp47	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	52.63157895	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026922	2542173	2540705	278648	277228	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC20F10.01	mtl1	gar1	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC25H2.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	51.54639175	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026923	2542173	2540884	278648	277401	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC19C2.14	mtl1	smd3	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	51.54639175	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026924	2542173	2539540	278648	276102	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC736.12c	mtl1	mmi1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	51.2295082	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026925	2542173	2541281	278648	277794	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC902.04	mtl1	rmn1	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC902.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	50.93378608	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026926	2542173	2542663	278648	279116	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC607.03c	mtl1	snu13	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	48.0	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026927	2542173	2539607	278648	276165	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC11G11.06c	mtl1	sme1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	47.61904762	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026928	2542173	2539499	278648	276062	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC622.08c	mtl1	hta1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	45.45454545	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026929	2542173	2541077	278648	277592	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC83.08	mtl1	rvb2	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	45.16129032	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026930	2542173	2541219	278648	277733	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC8D2.09c	mtl1	msl1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	45.04504505	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026931	2542173	2539791	278648	276341	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC13A2.01c	mtl1	cbc2	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC13A2.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	43.95604396	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026932	2542173	2542126	278648	278602	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC1B3.05	mtl1	not3	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	42.85714286	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026933	2542173	2538974	278648	275548	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC550.02c	mtl1	cwf5	SPAC17H9.02	ecm2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	42.37288136	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026934	2542173	3361260	278648	280336	SPAC17H9.02	SPBP22H7.07	mtl1	prp5	SPAC17H9.02	cwf1|pi024|SPACTOKYO_453.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	42.2832981	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026935	2542173	2543227	278648	279655	SPAC17H9.02	SPAPB8E5.09	mtl1	rvb1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	41.66666667	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026936	2542173	2542684	278648	279137	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC26A3.08	mtl1	smb1	SPAC17H9.02	smb	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	40.81632653	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026937	2542173	2542263	278648	278732	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC17A2.08c	mtl1	ntr2	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC17A2.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	40.74074074	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026938	2542173	2540565	278648	277092	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC1D7.04	mtl1	mlo3	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	40.20100503	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026939	2542173	2540753	278648	277274	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC211.02c	mtl1	cwf3	SPAC17H9.02	syf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	39.24050633	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026940	2542173	2542883	278648	279328	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC1486.04c	mtl1	alm1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	38.79559931	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026941	2542173	2538863	278648	275443	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC1682.03c	mtl1	mug174	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	38.33865815	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026942	2542173	2541168	278648	277683	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC6B1.10	mtl1	prp17	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	37.6344086	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026943	2542173	2540723	278648	277246	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC20F10.09	mtl1	lsm5	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	37.5	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026944	2542173	2542325	278648	278791	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC16C9.04c	mtl1	mot2	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	36.80981595	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026945	2542173	2542481	278648	278941	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC29A4.04c	mtl1	cbf5	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	35.8649789	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026946	2542173	2541466	278648	277968	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC14C4.06c	mtl1	nab2	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC14C4.06c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	35.83061889	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026947	2542173	2540328	278648	276858	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC31F10.11c	mtl1	cwf4	SPAC17H9.02	syf3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	35.60830861	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026948	2542173	2540711	278648	277234	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC215.12	mtl1	cwf10	SPAC17H9.02	snu114|spef2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	35.60528993	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026949	2542173	2540337	278648	276866	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC28F2.11	mtl1	hmo1	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC28F2.11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	35.48387097	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026950	2542173	2542507	278648	278965	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC18G6.13	mtl1	SPAC18G6.13	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	35.0877193	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026951	2542173	2540462	278648	276990	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC29A3.07c	mtl1	sap14	SPAC17H9.02	sab14|SF3b14a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	34.7826087	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026952	2542173	2543583	278648	279998	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC644.12	mtl1	cdc5	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	34.34610304	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026953	2542173	2542690	278648	279143	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC27D7.07c	mtl1	smd1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	34.18803419	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026954	2542173	2538778	278648	275359	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC4G3.15c	mtl1	not2	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	34.09090909	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026955	2542173	2541181	278648	277695	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC713.05	mtl1	SPBC713.05	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	33.67003367	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026956	2542173	2543676	278648	280090	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC9.03c	mtl1	brr2	SPAC17H9.02	spp41	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	33.54779412	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026957	2542173	2541619	278648	278116	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC27F1.09c	mtl1	prp10	SPAC17H9.02	sap155|SF3b155	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	32.82828283	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026958	2542173	2540057	278648	276595	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC16H5.10c	mtl1	prp43	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	32.65306122	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026959	2542173	2540230	278648	276762	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC32F12.05c	mtl1	cwf12	SPAC17H9.02	isy1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	32.25806452	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026960	2542173	2542799	278648	279247	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC1687.01	mtl1	rpc19	SPAC17H9.02	SPAPYUL23.01|rpa17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	32.0	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026961	2542173	2541124	278648	277639	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC646.02	mtl1	cwf11	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	31.93146417	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026962	2542173	2541814	278648	278305	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC23G3.06	mtl1	SPAC23G3.06	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	31.49606299	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026963	2542173	2541437	278648	277942	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC22A12.09c	mtl1	sap114	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	31.18503119	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026964	2542173	2542556	278648	279013	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC6G10.07	mtl1	cbc1	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC6G10.07	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	30.76923077	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026965	2542173	2540611	278648	277137	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC3E7.13c	mtl1	syf2	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	30.56768559	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026966	2542173	2538988	278648	275562	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC188.11	mtl1	prp45	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	30.52064632	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026967	2542173	2540932	278648	277448	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC36.09	mtl1	sap61	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	30.48780488	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026968	2542173	2541487	278648	277989	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC23D3.08	mtl1	usp108	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	29.6735905	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026969	2542173	2543413	278648	279835	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC4F8.12c	mtl1	spp42	SPAC17H9.02	cwf6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	29.20016928	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026970	2542173	2542463	278648	278924	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC1834.03c	mtl1	hhf1	SPAC17H9.02	h4.1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	29.12621359	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026971	2542173	2543409	278648	279831	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC4D7.13	mtl1	usp104	SPAC17H9.02	prp40	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	28.77697842	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026972	2542173	2541910	278648	278400	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC23C4.15	mtl1	rpb5	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	28.57142857	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026973	2542173	2539743	278648	276295	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC16A3.08c	mtl1	oga1	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC16A3.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	28.16901408	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026974	2542173	2539106	278648	275678	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC757.08	mtl1	rrp45	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC757.08	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	27.49140893	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026975	2542173	2543087	278648	279520	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC30C2.04	mtl1	SPAC30C2.04	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	26.66666667	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026976	2542173	2542000	278648	278484	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC20H4.06c	mtl1	SPAC20H4.06c	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	26.21722846	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026977	2542173	2538872	278648	275451	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC737.04	mtl1	SPCC737.04	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	26.12826603	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026978	2542173	2540368	278648	276897	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC36.05c	mtl1	clr6	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	24.69135802	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026979	2542173	2540865	278648	277382	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC4B4.07c	mtl1	usp102	SPAC17H9.02	mud1|U1A	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	24.09638554	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026980	2542173	2539794	278648	276344	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC14C8.12	mtl1	rpb8	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	24.0	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026981	2542173	2539523	278648	276085	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC622.09	mtl1	htb1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	23.80952381	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026982	2542173	2540258	278648	276789	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC32C12.02	mtl1	ste11	SPAC17H9.02	aff1|stex	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	23.5042735	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026983	2542173	2542531	278648	278989	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC3A12.11c	mtl1	cwf2	SPAC17H9.02	prp3|cwc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	23.19587629	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026984	2542173	2538913	278648	275490	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC31H12.08c	mtl1	ccr4	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC5E4.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	23.1884058	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026985	2542173	9406966	278648	1028329	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC16C4.22	mtl1	SPCC16C4.22	SPAC17H9.02	SPNCRNA.470|SPNG2185	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	22.98850575	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026986	2542173	2542764	278648	279214	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC15E1.10	mtl1	SPAC15E1.10	SPAC17H9.02	SPAP7G5.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	22.64150943	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026987	2542173	2542744	278648	279194	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC1565.08	mtl1	cdc48	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	22.08588957	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026988	2542173	2542467	278648	278928	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC1834.04	mtl1	hht1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	22.05882353	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026989	2542173	2539389	278648	275954	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC1827.05c	mtl1	SPCC1827.05c	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	21.73913043	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026990	2542173	2542001	278648	278485	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC20G8.06	mtl1	not1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	20.95238095	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026991	2542173	2538804	278648	275385	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC1620.01c	mtl1	lsm2	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	20.83333333	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026992	2542173	2539984	278648	276528	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC1289.11	mtl1	spf38	SPAC17H9.02	cwf17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	20.58823529	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026993	2542173	2540434	278648	276962	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC24C6.11	mtl1	cwf14	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	20.54794521	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026994	2542173	2538689	278648	275274	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC1795.11	mtl1	sum3	SPAC17H9.02	ded1|moc2|slh3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	20.44025157	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026995	2542173	2543541	278648	279958	SPAC17H9.02	SPAPB24D3.07c	mtl1	SPAPB24D3.07c	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	20.0	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026996	2542173	2541612	278648	278109	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC1F7.04	mtl1	rho1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	19.8019802	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026997	2542173	2540912	278648	277428	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC557.02c	mtl1	SPBC557.02c	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	19.7044335	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026998	2542173	2542461	278648	278922	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC19A8.13	mtl1	usp101	SPAC17H9.02	snp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	19.15708812	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1026999	2542173	2541600	278648	278097	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC6F12.17	mtl1	rna14	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	19.09959072	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027000	2542173	2542910	278648	279353	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC1486.03c	mtl1	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	18.82057716	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027001	2542173	2540622	278648	277148	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC21C3.05	mtl1	sap62	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	18.43317972	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027002	2542173	2539145	278648	275717	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC18.11c	mtl1	sdc1	SPAC17H9.02	dpy30	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	18.34862385	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027003	2542173	2543630	278648	280044	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC1F3.01	mtl1	rrp6	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC3H8.11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	18.01801802	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027004	2542173	2538888	278648	275466	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC1322.16	mtl1	phb2	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	17.92114695	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027005	2542173	2542475	278648	278935	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC1F12.02c	mtl1	SPAC1F12.02c	SPAC17H9.02	p23fy	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	17.85714286	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027006	2542173	2542047	278648	278528	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC21E11.03c	mtl1	pcr1	SPAC17H9.02	mts2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	17.54385965	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027007	2542173	2542564	278648	279020	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC1851.03	mtl1	ckb1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	17.31601732	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027008	2542173	2540213	278648	276746	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC17D1.06	mtl1	dbp3	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC17D1.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	17.30103806	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027009	2542173	2540376	278648	276905	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC26H8.11c	mtl1	SPBC26H8.11c	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	17.14285714	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027010	2542173	2539941	278648	276485	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC13E7.01	mtl1	cwf22	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC15D4.16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.91093574	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027011	2542173	2541645	278648	278141	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC1527.03	mtl1	SPAC1527.03	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.84210526	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027012	2542173	2539869	278648	276415	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC11B10.09	mtl1	cdc2	SPAC17H9.02	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.83501684	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027013	2542173	2542795	278648	279243	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC9G1.05	mtl1	aip1	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC9G1.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.80672269	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027014	2542173	2542829	278648	279276	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC13D6.02c	mtl1	byr3	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.75977654	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027015	2542173	2540475	278648	277003	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC30D10.06	mtl1	lsm4	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.52892562	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027016	2542173	2541289	278648	277802	SPAC17H9.02	SPBP35G2.09	mtl1	usp103	SPAC17H9.02	yhc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.48351648	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027017	2542173	2540869	278648	277386	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC4B4.09	mtl1	usp105	SPAC17H9.02	prp39	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.33986928	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027018	2542173	2542443	278648	278905	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC17G6.13	mtl1	slt1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.16628176	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027019	2542173	2540086	278648	276624	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC16H5.12c	mtl1	SPBC16H5.12c	SPAC17H9.02	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.12903226	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027020	2542173	2543438	278648	279858	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC8F11.04	mtl1	SPAC8F11.04	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.08579088	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027021	2542173	2540941	278648	277457	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC365.05c	mtl1	slu7	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	15.83113456	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027022	2542173	2543278	278648	279706	SPAC17H9.02	SPAPJ698.03c	mtl1	prp12	SPAC17H9.02	sap130|SF3b130	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	15.75456053	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027023	2542173	2540306	278648	276836	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC2G5.02c	mtl1	ckb2	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC2G5.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	15.7480315	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027024	2542173	2542948	278648	279388	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC1006.07	mtl1	SPAC1006.07	SPAC17H9.02	tif1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	15.30612245	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027025	2542173	2540544	278648	277071	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC25B2.05	mtl1	mis3	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	15.29051988	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027026	2542173	2540239	278648	276771	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC32H8.10	mtl1	cdk9	SPAC17H9.02	SPACTOKYO_453.22	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	15.2284264	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027027	2542173	2539055	278648	275628	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC16A11.13	mtl1	luc7	SPAC17H9.02	usp106	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	15.15151515	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027028	2542173	2541972	278648	278457	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC23C11.11	mtl1	cka1	SPAC17H9.02	orb5	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	15.06024096	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027029	2542173	2540469	278648	276997	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC26H8.08c	mtl1	grn1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.89361702	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027030	2542173	2539806	278648	276356	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC1711.08	mtl1	aha1	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC1711.08	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.88095238	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027031	2542173	2542165	278648	278641	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC1782.08c	mtl1	rex3	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.81481481	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027032	2542173	2541635	278648	278131	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC1556.01c	mtl1	rad50	SPAC17H9.02	SPAP4C9.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.78599222	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027033	2542173	2539305	278648	275873	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC613.07	mtl1	SPCC613.07	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.49275362	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027034	2542173	2541684	278648	278180	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC22G7.04	mtl1	pan2	SPAC17H9.02	ubp13	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.34977578	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027035	2542173	2540966	278648	277482	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC3D6.09	mtl1	dpb4	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.28571429	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027036	2542173	2540117	278648	276654	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC1289.12	mtl1	usp109	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.20454545	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027037	2542173	2541306	278648	277818	SPAC17H9.02	SPBP16F5.07	mtl1	apm1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.08450704	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027038	2542173	2541364	278648	277875	SPAC17H9.02	SPBP8B7.11	mtl1	nxt3	SPAC17H9.02	glp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	13.82488479	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027039	2542173	2543549	278648	279966	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC890.04c	mtl1	SPAC890.04c	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	13.63636364	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027040	2542173	2542520	278648	278978	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC20G8.09c	mtl1	nat10	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC20G8.09c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	13.55275895	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027041	2542173	2541609	278648	278106	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC22F8.10c	mtl1	sap145	SPAC17H9.02	SF3b145	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	13.31114809	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027042	2542173	2539924	278648	276468	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC1198.13c	mtl1	tfg2	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC660.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	13.02931596	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027043	2542173	2538897	278648	275475	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC1183.07	mtl1	SPCC1183.07	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	13.01775148	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027044	2542173	3361396	278648	280472	SPAC17H9.02	SPAPB17E12.11	mtl1	SPAPB17E12.11	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.94498382	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027045	2542173	2541793	278648	278284	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC22H10.02	mtl1	SPAC22H10.02	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.65822785	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027046	2542173	2542715	278648	279168	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC25H1.08c	mtl1	SPAC25H1.08c	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.53132832	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027047	2542173	2541126	278648	277641	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC651.01c	mtl1	nog1	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC725.18c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.46105919	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027048	2542173	2542874	278648	279319	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC20H4.09	mtl1	SPAC20H4.09	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC145.03	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.36476043	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027049	2542173	2539109	278648	275681	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC74.03c	mtl1	ssp2	SPAC17H9.02	ucp9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.15277778	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027050	2542173	2541668	278648	278164	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC1F7.02c	mtl1	has1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.11072664	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027051	2542173	2542134	278648	278610	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC18G6.06	mtl1	SPAC18G6.06	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.04819277	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027052	2542173	2540324	278648	276854	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC29A3.16	mtl1	rrs1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.04819277	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027053	2542173	2542650	278648	279104	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC2C4.10c	mtl1	csc4	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC2C4.10c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.04819277	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027054	2542173	2542121	278648	278597	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC17H9.05	mtl1	ebp2	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.01201201	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027055	2542173	2539699	278648	276252	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC11G11.05	mtl1	rpa34	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.95219124	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027056	2542173	2541914	278648	278404	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC2F3.03c	mtl1	rpa49	SPAC17H9.02	rpa51	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.76470588	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027057	2542173	2541654	278648	278150	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC22G7.05	mtl1	kri1	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC22G7.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.70568562	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027058	2542173	2540412	278648	276940	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC211.08c	mtl1	mtr3	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC211.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.67315175	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027059	2542173	2540989	278648	277505	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC3B9.07c	mtl1	rpa43	SPAC17H9.02	rpa21	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.56069364	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027060	2542173	2539158	278648	275730	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC18.12c	mtl1	utp23	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.53846154	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027061	2542173	2540873	278648	277390	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC4C3.05c	mtl1	nuc1	SPAC17H9.02	rpa1|rpa190	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.24925992	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027062	2542173	2540743	278648	277266	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC215.06c	mtl1	SPBC215.06c	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.23595506	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027063	2542173	2542856	278648	279302	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC6F12.11c	mtl1	sfc1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.96491228	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027064	2542173	2543372	278648	279794	SPAC17H9.02	SPAPB1A10.09	mtl1	ase1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.94391245	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027065	2542173	2542514	278648	278972	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC19D5.05c	mtl1	imp3	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.92896175	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027066	2542173	2542472	278648	278933	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC9E9.13	mtl1	wos2	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.75268817	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027067	2542173	2541354	278648	277865	SPAC17H9.02	SPBPB7E8.02	mtl1	SPBPB7E8.02	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.68090788	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027068	2542173	2542094	278648	278571	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC29B12.06c	mtl1	rcd1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.60070671	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027069	2542173	2541817	278648	278308	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC23H4.09	mtl1	cdb4	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.49868766	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027070	2542173	2538787	278648	275368	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC364.02c	mtl1	bis1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.41666667	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027071	2542173	2539268	278648	275838	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC10H11.02	mtl1	cwf23	SPAC17H9.02	SPCP31B10.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.38062284	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027072	2542173	2543616	278648	280030	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC4A8.09c	mtl1	cwf21	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.23890785	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027073	2542173	2540268	278648	276799	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC800.06	mtl1	brx1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.16949153	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027074	2542173	2538984	278648	275558	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC1753.05	mtl1	rsm1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.13513514	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027075	2542173	2538816	278648	275397	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC1442.10c	mtl1	rpb3	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.1010101	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027076	2542173	2541211	278648	277725	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC839.10	mtl1	usp107	SPAC17H9.02	snu71	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.07194245	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027077	2542173	2542632	278648	279086	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC24H6.05	mtl1	cdc25	SPAC17H9.02	sal2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.06711409	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027078	2542173	2542038	278648	278520	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC23C11.03	mtl1	SPAC23C11.03	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.03344482	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027079	2542173	2541944	278648	278431	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC222.06	mtl1	mak16	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.933774834	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027080	2542173	2543686	278648	280100	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC3C7.14c	mtl1	obr1	SPAC17H9.02	apt1|uhp1|p25	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.900990099	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027081	2542173	2539386	278648	275951	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC16C4.16c	mtl1	SPCC16C4.16c	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.708737864	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027082	2542173	2543484	278648	279904	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC959.03c	mtl1	SPAC959.03c	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.615384615	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027083	2542173	2539893	278648	276439	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC1539.10	mtl1	nop16	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.56937799	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027084	2542173	2543500	278648	279918	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC926.08c	mtl1	SPAC926.08c	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.463722397	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027085	2542173	2542978	278648	279416	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC10F6.02c	mtl1	prp22	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.417808219	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027086	2542173	2542777	278648	279226	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC6F6.03c	mtl1	SPAC6F6.03c	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.310986965	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027087	2542173	2541193	278648	277707	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC776.02c	mtl1	dis2	SPAC17H9.02	bws1|sds1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.174311927	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027088	2542173	2540234	278648	276766	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC336.12c	mtl1	cdc10	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.126466754	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027089	2542173	2541440	278648	277945	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC1565.05	mtl1	utp8	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC1565.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.055627426	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027090	2542173	2539041	278648	275614	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC18.06c	mtl1	caf1	SPAC17H9.02	pop2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.036144578	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027091	2542173	2539968	278648	276512	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC16E9.10c	mtl1	SPBC16E9.10c	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.985879332	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027092	2542173	2541682	278648	278178	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC15F9.02	mtl1	seh1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.849557522	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027093	2542173	2541908	278648	278398	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC23D3.02	mtl1	rfc2	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.823529412	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027094	2542173	2541493	278648	277995	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC27E2.10c	mtl1	rfc3	SPAC17H9.02	SPAPJ698.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.771929825	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027095	2542173	2540237	278648	276769	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC32F12.06	mtl1	pch1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.771929825	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027096	2542173	2543631	278648	280045	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC458.02c	mtl1	SPAC458.02c	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.547008547	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027097	2542173	2541280	278648	277793	SPAC17H9.02	SPBP23A10.07	mtl1	rpa2	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.517887564	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027098	2542173	2542486	278648	278945	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC19B12.12c	mtl1	yip11	SPAC17H9.02	yip1|yip1-a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.510638298	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027099	2542173	2541729	278648	278223	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC22H12.02	mtl1	tfg3	SPAC17H9.02	taf14	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.298755187	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027100	2542173	2539702	278648	276255	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC1604.12	mtl1	SPBC1604.12	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.139534884	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027101	2542173	2541942	278648	278429	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC222.09	mtl1	seb1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.064516129	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027102	2542173	2539285	278648	275853	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC1672.02c	mtl1	sap1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.874015748	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027103	2542173	2543089	278648	279522	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC12G12.14c	mtl1	pfs2	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.858546169	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027104	2542173	2540440	278648	276968	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC646.12c	mtl1	gap1	SPAC17H9.02	sar1|src1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.832898172	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027105	2542173	2540220	278648	276753	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC337.03	mtl1	rhn1	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC337.03|iss4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.751937984	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027106	2542173	2541163	278648	277678	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC83.15	mtl1	SPBC83.15	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.751937984	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027107	2542173	2542258	278648	278727	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC17G6.16c	mtl1	ysh1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.741935484	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027108	2542173	2540627	278648	277153	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC25H2.13c	mtl1	cdc20	SPAC17H9.02	pol2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.730786721	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027109	2542173	2540203	278648	276736	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC1604.09c	mtl1	SPBC1604.09c	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.692307692	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027110	2542173	2542222	278648	278695	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC31G5.18c	mtl1	sde2	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.604562738	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027111	2542173	2542400	278648	278864	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC17G6.10	mtl1	ssr1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.590132827	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027112	2542173	2540677	278648	277202	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC21B10.03c	mtl1	ath1	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC21B10.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.585335019	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027113	2542173	2539928	278648	276472	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC1604.08c	mtl1	imp1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.421150278	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027114	2542173	2540189	278648	276722	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC17D1.03c	mtl1	rrp43	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC17D1.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.407407407	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027115	2542173	2539426	278648	275991	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC962.03c	mtl1	cut15	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.380073801	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027116	2542173	2541806	278648	278297	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC4G8.13c	mtl1	prz1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.342143906	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027117	2542173	2542964	278648	279404	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC12G12.07c	mtl1	SPAC12G12.07c	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.281553398	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027118	2542173	2542140	278648	278616	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC1783.07c	mtl1	pap1	SPAC17H9.02	caf3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.246376812	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027119	2542173	2543462	278648	279882	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC644.16	mtl1	SPAC644.16	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.109004739	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027120	2542173	2542880	278648	279325	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC6F12.14	mtl1	cut23	SPAC17H9.02	apc8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.079646018	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027121	2542173	2539537	278648	276099	SPAC17H9.02	SPCP1E11.04c	mtl1	pal1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.058823529	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027122	2542173	2539366	278648	275932	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC16C4.11	mtl1	pef1	SPAC17H9.02	p31	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.944444444	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027123	2542173	2540801	278648	277320	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC18H10.10c	mtl1	saf4	SPAC17H9.02	cwc16|cwf16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.802721088	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027124	2542173	2540543	278648	277070	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC29A10.06c	mtl1	ely5	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.779661017	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027125	2542173	2541530	278648	278030	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC57A10.10c	mtl1	sla1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.711409396	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027126	2542173	2541000	278648	277516	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC3B8.09	mtl1	SPBC3B8.09	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.700167504	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027127	2542173	2539299	278648	275867	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC1672.07	mtl1	SPCC1672.07	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.651884701	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027128	2542173	2539687	278648	276242	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC1711.05	mtl1	SPBC1711.05	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.651884701	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027129	2542173	2539133	278648	275705	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC16C4.18c	mtl1	taf6	SPAC17H9.02	taf50	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.637168142	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027130	2542173	2541185	278648	277699	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC6B1.07	mtl1	prp1	SPAC17H9.02	zer1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.622516556	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027131	2542173	2541274	278648	277788	SPAC17H9.02	SPBP8B7.20c	mtl1	nop2	SPAC17H9.02	SPBP8B7.20c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.578947368	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027132	2542173	3361269	278648	280345	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC31A8.01c	mtl1	rtn1	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.493506494	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027133	2542173	2540645	278648	277170	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC21B10.05c	mtl1	pop3	SPAC17H9.02	wat1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.369426752	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027134	2542173	2541639	278648	278135	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC6F12.16c	mtl1	mtr4	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.266786034	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027135	2542173	2539693	278648	276247	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC1711.07	mtl1	SPBC1711.07	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.25	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027136	2542173	2541762	278648	278256	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC139.01c	mtl1	SPAC139.01c	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC955.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.234413965	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027137	2542173	2538833	278648	275414	SPAC17H9.02	SPCP1E11.11	mtl1	puf6	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.230529595	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027138	2542173	2542554	278648	279011	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC1952.03	mtl1	otu2	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.172839506	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027139	2542173	2539187	278648	275758	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC16C4.14c	mtl1	sfc4	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.964214712	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027140	2542173	2541592	278648	278089	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC6F12.15c	mtl1	cut9	SPAC17H9.02	dre1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.961251863	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027141	2542173	2543079	278648	279512	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC343.04c	mtl1	SPAC343.04c	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.917159763	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027142	2542173	2542665	278648	279118	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC10F6.08c	mtl1	nht10	SPAC17H9.02	nht1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.865102639	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027143	2542173	2541088	278648	277603	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC609.05	mtl1	pob3	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.859375	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027144	2542173	2542790	278648	279239	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC1687.03c	mtl1	rfc4	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.847953216	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027145	2542173	2539789	278648	276339	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC1711.16	mtl1	pwp1	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC1711.16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.813953488	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027146	2542173	2541446	278648	277951	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC23G3.01	mtl1	rpb2	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC521.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.785123967	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027147	2542173	2539663	278648	276218	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC1289.07c	mtl1	rpc40	SPAC17H9.02	rpa42	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.747126437	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027148	2542173	2541652	278648	278148	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC24B11.06c	mtl1	sty1	SPAC17H9.02	phh1|spc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.730659026	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027149	2542173	2541476	278648	277978	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC2E1P5.05	mtl1	rrp9	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC2E1P5.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.72519084	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027150	2542173	2540215	278648	276748	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC83.14c	mtl1	rfc5	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.586592179	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027151	2542173	2539694	278648	276248	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC1709.08	mtl1	cft1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.551700208	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027152	2542173	2539847	278648	276395	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC530.14c	mtl1	dsk1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.514705882	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027153	2542173	2542936	278648	279377	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC12G12.06c	mtl1	SPAC12G12.06c	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.509641873	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027154	2542173	2541176	278648	277690	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC776.08c	mtl1	utp22	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC776.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.46946217	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027155	2542173	2542474	278648	278934	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC31G5.09c	mtl1	spk1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.376344086	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027156	2542173	2539834	278648	276383	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC14C8.14c	mtl1	pol5	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.213764338	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027157	2542173	2539816	278648	276366	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC12C2.04	mtl1	SPBC12C2.04	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.208333333	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027158	2542173	2539280	278648	275848	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC330.10	mtl1	pcm1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.141388175	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027159	2542173	2541434	278648	277939	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC27E2.03c	mtl1	SPAC27E2.03c	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.102040816	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027160	2542173	2541602	278648	278099	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC1F5.10	mtl1	SPAC1F5.10	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.076142132	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027161	2542173	2542674	278648	279127	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC26A3.12c	mtl1	dhp1	SPAC17H9.02	rat1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.045408678	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027162	2542173	2542217	278648	278691	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC1B3.13	mtl1	nan1	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC1B3.13	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.0	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027163	2540291	2542636	276822	279090	SPBC337.12	SPAP27G11.13c	red5	nop10	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	78.125	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPAC17H9.02	-	BIOGRID
1027164	2540291	2541062	276822	277577	SPBC337.12	SPBC660.11	red5	tcg1	SPBC337.12	mug187	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	68.96551724	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027165	2540291	2539733	276822	276285	SPBC337.12	SPBC16E9.12c	red5	pab2	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	66.26506024	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027166	2540291	2540330	276822	276860	SPBC337.12	SPBC3E7.14	red5	smf1	SPBC337.12	SPBC4F6.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	64.1025641	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027167	2540291	2540565	276822	277092	SPBC337.12	SPBC1D7.04	red5	mlo3	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	60.30150754	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027168	2540291	2542799	276822	279247	SPBC337.12	SPAC1687.01	red5	rpc19	SPBC337.12	SPAPYUL23.01|rpa17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	56.0	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027169	2540291	2540479	276822	277007	SPBC337.12	SPBC2D10.10c	red5	fib1	SPBC337.12	fib|nop1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	52.45901639	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027170	2540291	2541519	276822	278020	SPBC337.12	SPAC227.07c	red5	pab1	SPBC337.12	ret1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	50.53598775	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027171	2540291	2541645	276822	278141	SPBC337.12	SPAC1527.03	red5	SPAC1527.03	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	50.52631579	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027172	2540291	2539743	276822	276295	SPBC337.12	SPBC16A3.08c	red5	oga1	SPBC337.12	SPBC16A3.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	49.29577465	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027173	2540291	2539794	276822	276344	SPBC337.12	SPBC14C8.12	red5	rpb8	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	48.0	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027174	2540291	2539607	276822	276165	SPBC337.12	SPBC11G11.06c	red5	sme1	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	47.61904762	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027175	2540291	2542369	276822	278833	SPBC337.12	SPAC1782.10c	red5	nhp2	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	45.45454545	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027176	2540291	2541087	276822	277602	SPBC337.12	SPBC646.10c	red5	SPBC646.10c	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	44.26559356	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027177	2540291	2543038	276822	279473	SPBC337.12	SPAC31A2.08	red5	mrp20	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	43.47826087	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027178	2540291	2540884	276822	277401	SPBC337.12	SPBC19C2.14	red5	smd3	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	41.2371134	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027179	2540291	2540855	276822	277372	SPBC337.12	SPBC4B4.05	red5	smg1	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	38.96103896	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027180	2540291	2540337	276822	276866	SPBC337.12	SPBC28F2.11	red5	hmo1	SPBC337.12	SPBC28F2.11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	35.48387097	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027181	2540291	2540087	276822	276625	SPBC337.12	SPBC32H8.05	red5	SPBC32H8.05	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	34.18803419	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027182	2540291	2539913	276822	276457	SPBC337.12	SPBC11G11.03	red5	mrt4	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	33.19502075	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027183	2540291	2540213	276822	276746	SPBC337.12	SPBC17D1.06	red5	dbp3	SPBC337.12	SPCC17D1.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	32.87197232	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027184	2540291	2542663	276822	279116	SPBC337.12	SPAC607.03c	red5	snu13	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	32.0	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027185	2540291	2540792	276822	277311	SPBC337.12	SPBC4F6.06	red5	kin1	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	31.42536476	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027186	2540291	2540705	276822	277228	SPBC337.12	SPBC20F10.01	red5	gar1	SPBC337.12	SPBC25H2.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	30.92783505	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027187	2540291	2541530	276822	278030	SPBC337.12	SPAC57A10.10c	red5	sla1	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	30.20134228	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027188	2540291	2539537	276822	276099	SPBC337.12	SPCP1E11.04c	red5	pal1	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	28.23529412	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027189	2540291	2542233	276822	278705	SPBC337.12	SPAC1B3.12c	red5	rpb10	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	28.16901408	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027190	2540291	2539699	276822	276252	SPBC337.12	SPBC11G11.05	red5	rpa34	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	27.88844622	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027191	2540291	2540748	276822	277270	SPBC337.12	SPBC19F8.05	red5	SPBC19F8.05	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	27.52293578	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027192	2540291	2542121	276822	278597	SPBC337.12	SPAC17H9.05	red5	ebp2	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	27.02702703	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027193	2540291	2543087	276822	279520	SPBC337.12	SPAC30C2.04	red5	SPAC30C2.04	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	26.66666667	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027194	2540291	2542256	276822	278726	SPBC337.12	SPAC29A4.08c	red5	prp19	SPBC337.12	cwf8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	26.63934426	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027195	2540291	2541914	276822	278404	SPBC337.12	SPAC2F3.03c	red5	rpa49	SPBC337.12	rpa51	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	25.88235294	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027196	2540291	2543500	276822	279918	SPBC337.12	SPAC926.08c	red5	SPAC926.08c	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	25.23659306	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027197	2540291	2538906	276822	275483	SPBC337.12	SPCC1259.03	red5	rpa12	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	25.21008403	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027198	2540291	2539356	276822	275922	SPBC337.12	SPCC24B10.04	red5	SPCC24B10.04	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	25.12562814	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027199	2540291	2539523	276822	276085	SPBC337.12	SPCC622.09	red5	htb1	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	23.80952381	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027200	2540291	2540268	276822	276799	SPBC337.12	SPBC800.06	red5	brx1	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	23.72881356	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027201	2540291	2538897	276822	275475	SPBC337.12	SPCC1183.07	red5	SPCC1183.07	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	23.66863905	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027202	2540291	2539413	276822	275978	SPBC337.12	SPCP1E11.08	red5	SPCP1E11.08	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	23.07692308	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027203	2540291	2540835	276822	277353	SPBC337.12	SPBC18H10.17c	red5	SPBC18H10.17c	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	22.85714286	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027204	2540291	2542314	276822	278780	SPBC337.12	SPAC16E8.06c	red5	nop12	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	22.83105023	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027205	2540291	2540873	276822	277390	SPBC337.12	SPBC4C3.05c	red5	nuc1	SPBC337.12	rpa1|rpa190	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	21.90645352	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027206	2540291	2543142	276822	279574	SPBC337.12	SPAC12G12.02	red5	efg1	SPBC337.12	SPAC12G12.02|SPAC630.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	21.8579235	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027207	2540291	2541077	276822	277592	SPBC337.12	SPBC83.08	red5	rvb2	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	21.50537634	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027208	2540291	2543438	276822	279858	SPBC337.12	SPAC8F11.04	red5	SPAC8F11.04	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	21.44772118	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027209	2540291	2542481	276822	278941	SPBC337.12	SPAC29A4.04c	red5	cbf5	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	21.09704641	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027210	2540291	2543254	276822	279682	SPBC337.12	SPAC1006.03c	red5	red1	SPBC337.12	iss3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	21.00840336	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027211	2540291	2539675	276822	276230	SPBC337.12	SPBC1718.03	red5	ker1	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	20.40816327	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027212	2540291	2542520	276822	278978	SPBC337.12	SPAC20G8.09c	red5	nat10	SPBC337.12	SPAC20G8.09c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	20.32913843	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027213	2540291	2541192	276822	277706	SPBC337.12	SPBC83.17	red5	SPBC83.17	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	20.27027027	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027214	2540291	2541814	276822	278305	SPBC337.12	SPAC23G3.06	red5	SPAC23G3.06	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	19.68503937	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027215	2540291	2542463	276822	278924	SPBC337.12	SPAC1834.03c	red5	hhf1	SPBC337.12	h4.1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	19.41747573	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027216	2540291	2539893	276822	276439	SPBC337.12	SPBC1539.10	red5	nop16	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	19.13875598	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027217	2540291	2540086	276822	276624	SPBC337.12	SPBC16H5.12c	red5	SPBC16H5.12c	SPBC337.12	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	19.06158358	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027218	2540291	2538689	276822	275274	SPBC337.12	SPCC1795.11	red5	sum3	SPBC337.12	ded1|moc2|slh3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	18.86792453	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027219	2540291	2540324	276822	276854	SPBC337.12	SPBC29A3.16	red5	rrs1	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	18.07228916	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027220	2540291	2539789	276822	276339	SPBC337.12	SPBC1711.16	red5	pwp1	SPBC337.12	SPBC1711.16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	17.44186047	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027221	2540291	2543463	276822	279883	SPBC337.12	SPAPB21F2.03	red5	slx9	SPBC337.12	SPAPB21F2.03	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	17.44186047	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027222	2540291	2542480	276822	278940	SPBC337.12	SPAC2C4.03c	red5	smd2	SPBC337.12	cwf9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	17.39130435	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027223	2540291	2542744	276822	279194	SPBC337.12	SPAC1565.08	red5	cdc48	SPBC337.12	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	17.17791411	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027224	2540291	2538833	276822	275414	SPBC337.12	SPCP1E11.11	red5	puf6	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	17.13395639	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027225	2540291	2543631	276822	280045	SPBC337.12	SPAC458.02c	red5	SPAC458.02c	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	17.09401709	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027226	2540291	2542690	276822	279143	SPBC337.12	SPAC27D7.07c	red5	smd1	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	17.09401709	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027227	2540291	2542964	276822	279404	SPBC337.12	SPAC12G12.07c	red5	SPAC12G12.07c	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.99029126	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027228	2540291	2540743	276822	277266	SPBC337.12	SPBC215.06c	red5	SPBC215.06c	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.85393258	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027229	2540291	2542449	276822	278910	SPBC337.12	SPAC17H9.07	red5	SPAC17H9.07	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.66666667	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027230	2540291	2541944	276822	278431	SPBC337.12	SPAC222.06	red5	mak16	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.55629139	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027231	2540291	2542965	276822	279405	SPBC337.12	SPAC3G6.04	red5	rnp24	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.2601626	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027232	2540291	2541364	276822	277875	SPBC337.12	SPBP8B7.11	red5	nxt3	SPBC337.12	glp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.12903226	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027233	2540291	2543549	276822	279966	SPBC337.12	SPAC890.04c	red5	SPAC890.04c	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	15.90909091	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027234	2540291	2541817	276822	278308	SPBC337.12	SPAC23H4.09	red5	cdb4	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	15.7480315	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027235	2540291	2539158	276822	275730	SPBC337.12	SPCC18.12c	red5	utp23	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	15.38461538	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027236	2540291	2539499	276822	276062	SPBC337.12	SPCC622.08c	red5	hta1	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	15.15151515	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027237	2540291	2541612	276822	278109	SPBC337.12	SPAC1F7.04	red5	rho1	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.85148515	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027238	2540291	2541908	276822	278398	SPBC337.12	SPAC23D3.02	red5	rfc2	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.70588235	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027239	2540291	2539663	276822	276218	SPBC337.12	SPBC1289.07c	red5	rpc40	SPBC337.12	rpa42	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.36781609	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027240	2540291	2541910	276822	278400	SPBC337.12	SPAC23C4.15	red5	rpb5	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.28571429	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027241	2540291	2542354	276822	278819	SPBC337.12	SPAC1782.06c	red5	phb1	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.18439716	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027242	2540291	2538901	276822	275479	SPBC337.12	SPCP1E11.07c	red5	cwf18	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.08450704	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027243	2540291	2543491	276822	279911	SPBC337.12	SPAC683.02c	red5	SPAC683.02c	SPBC337.12	SPAC694.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	13.76146789	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027244	2540291	2540434	276822	276962	SPBC337.12	SPBC24C6.11	red5	cwf14	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	13.69863014	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027245	2540291	2542684	276822	279137	SPBC337.12	SPAC26A3.08	red5	smb1	SPBC337.12	smb	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	13.60544218	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027246	2540291	2541002	276822	277517	SPBC337.12	SPBC3E7.07c	red5	SPBC3E7.07c	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	13.60544218	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027247	2540291	2543541	276822	279958	SPBC337.12	SPAPB24D3.07c	red5	SPAPB24D3.07c	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	13.33333333	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027248	2540291	2540924	276822	277440	SPBC337.12	SPBC365.04c	red5	SPBC365.04c	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.87553648	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027249	2540291	2540469	276822	276997	SPBC337.12	SPBC26H8.08c	red5	grn1	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.76595745	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027250	2540291	2541334	276822	277845	SPBC337.12	SPBP4H10.18c	red5	SPBP4H10.18c	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.7388535	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027251	2540291	2539538	276822	276100	SPBC337.12	SPCC364.06	red5	nap1	SPBC337.12	nap11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.72264631	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027252	2540291	2540723	276822	277246	SPBC337.12	SPBC20F10.09	red5	lsm5	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.5	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027253	2540291	2540930	276822	277446	SPBC337.12	SPBC354.10	red5	def1	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.46105919	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027254	2540291	2540544	276822	277071	SPBC337.12	SPBC25B2.05	red5	mis3	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.2324159	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027255	2540291	2541280	276822	277793	SPBC337.12	SPBP23A10.07	red5	rpa2	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.92504259	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027256	2540291	2541281	276822	277794	SPBC337.12	SPBC902.04	red5	rmn1	SPBC337.12	SPBC902.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.88455008	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027257	2540291	2541487	276822	277989	SPBC337.12	SPAC23D3.08	red5	usp108	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.8694362	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027258	2540291	2541493	276822	277995	SPBC337.12	SPAC27E2.10c	red5	rfc3	SPBC337.12	SPAPJ698.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.69590643	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027259	2540291	2540989	276822	277505	SPBC337.12	SPBC3B9.07c	red5	rpa43	SPBC337.12	rpa21	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.56069364	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027260	2540291	2541136	276822	277651	SPBC337.12	SPBC691.04	red5	SPBC691.04	SPBC337.12	pi031|SPACTOKYO_453.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.21495327	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027261	2540291	2542777	276822	279226	SPBC337.12	SPAC6F6.03c	red5	SPAC6F6.03c	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.17318436	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027262	2540291	2542829	276822	279276	SPBC337.12	SPAC13D6.02c	red5	byr3	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.17318436	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027263	2540291	2539265	276822	275835	SPBC337.12	SPCC553.06	red5	swp1	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.0701107	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027264	2540291	2539932	276822	276476	SPBC337.12	SPBC13E7.07	red5	SPBC13E7.07	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.98901099	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027265	2540291	2541655	276822	278151	SPBC337.12	SPAC7D4.14c	red5	iss10	SPBC337.12	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.8892922	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027266	2540291	2540874	276822	277391	SPBC337.12	SPBC4F6.07c	red5	SPBC4F6.07c	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.80246914	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027267	2540291	2540585	276822	277111	SPBC337.12	SPBC28F2.04c	red5	cwf7	SPBC337.12	spf27	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.69518717	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027268	2540291	2539333	276822	275899	SPBC337.12	SPCC1902.02	red5	mug72	SPBC337.12	SPCC663.16c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.45296167	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027269	2540291	2539834	276822	276383	SPBC337.12	SPBC14C8.14c	red5	pol5	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.42752868	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027270	2540291	2543574	276822	279989	SPBC337.12	SPAC4F10.06	red5	SPAC4F10.06	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.30927835	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027271	2540291	2543630	276822	280044	SPBC337.12	SPAC1F3.01	red5	rrp6	SPBC337.12	SPAC3H8.11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.2960103	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027272	2540291	2541919	276822	278409	SPBC337.12	SPAC227.02c	red5	SPAC227.02c	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.756097561	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027273	2540291	2542173	276822	278648	SPBC337.12	SPAC17H9.02	red5	mtl1	SPBC337.12	SPAC17H9.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.708737864	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027274	2540291	2543372	276822	279794	SPBC337.12	SPAPB1A10.09	red5	ase1	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.575923393	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027275	2540291	2541680	276822	278176	SPBC337.12	SPAC22F8.09	red5	rrp16	SPBC337.12	nop53	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.546539379	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027276	2540291	2539702	276822	276255	SPBC337.12	SPBC1604.12	red5	SPBC1604.12	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.302325581	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027277	2540291	2540149	276822	276686	SPBC337.12	SPBC1289.03c	red5	spi1	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.259259259	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027278	2540291	2542443	276822	278905	SPBC337.12	SPAC17G6.13	red5	slt1	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.237875289	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027279	2540291	2540711	276822	277234	SPBC337.12	SPBC215.12	red5	cwf10	SPBC337.12	snu114|spef2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.155645982	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027280	2540291	2543540	276822	279957	SPBC337.12	SPAC664.08c	red5	bfr2	SPBC337.12	SPAC664.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.849557522	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027281	2540291	2543227	276822	279655	SPBC337.12	SPAPB8E5.09	red5	rvb1	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.771929825	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027282	2540291	2542327	276822	278793	SPBC337.12	SPAC16C9.06c	red5	upf1	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.648648649	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027283	2540291	2542666	276822	279119	SPBC337.12	SPAC1142.04	red5	SPAC1142.04	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.486562942	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027284	2540291	2539831	276822	276380	SPBC337.12	SPBC15C4.05	red5	dhx29	SPBC337.12	SPBC15C4.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.403361345	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027285	2540291	2542015	276822	278498	SPBC337.12	SPAC2G11.15c	red5	tgs1	SPBC337.12	SPAC521.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.368200837	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027286	2540291	2541654	276822	278150	SPBC337.12	SPAC22G7.05	red5	kri1	SPBC337.12	SPAC22G7.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.361204013	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027287	2540291	2540659	276822	277184	SPBC337.12	SPBC19F5.05c	red5	ppp1	SPBC337.12	SPBC25D12.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.23723229	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027288	2540291	2541274	276822	277788	SPBC337.12	SPBP8B7.20c	red5	nop2	SPBC337.12	SPBP8B7.20c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.223684211	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027289	2540291	2539540	276822	276102	SPBC337.12	SPCC736.12c	red5	mmi1	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.196721311	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027290	2540291	2542869	276822	279314	SPBC337.12	SPAC140.02	red5	gar2	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.0	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027291	2540291	2539425	276822	275990	SPBC337.12	SPCC550.14	red5	vgl1	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.818608288	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027292	2540291	2542715	276822	279168	SPBC337.12	SPAC25H1.08c	red5	SPAC25H1.08c	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.518796992	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027293	2540291	2540871	276822	277388	SPBC337.12	SPBC4F6.14	red5	SPBC4F6.14	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.418397626	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027294	2540291	2542908	276822	279352	SPBC337.12	SPAC13G7.03	red5	upf3	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.194244604	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027295	2540291	2538888	276822	275466	SPBC337.12	SPCC1322.16	red5	phb2	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.168458781	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027296	2540291	2543648	276822	280062	SPBC337.12	SPAC4F10.09c	red5	SPAC4F10.09c	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.976744186	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027297	2540291	2540797	276822	277316	SPBC337.12	SPBC18H10.11c	red5	ppr2	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.944444444	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027298	2540291	2541668	276822	278164	SPBC337.12	SPAC1F7.02c	red5	has1	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.920415225	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027299	2540291	2539106	276822	275678	SPBC337.12	SPCC757.08	red5	rrp45	SPBC337.12	SPCC757.08	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.872852234	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027300	2540291	2540400	276822	276928	SPBC337.12	SPBC28F2.02	red5	mep33	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.849315068	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027301	2540291	2541235	276822	277749	SPBC337.12	SPBC8D2.12c	red5	SPBC8D2.12c	SPBC337.12	pI053	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.825938567	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027302	2540291	2540239	276822	276771	SPBC337.12	SPBC32H8.10	red5	cdk9	SPBC337.12	SPACTOKYO_453.22	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.768189509	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027303	2540291	2540727	276822	277250	SPBC337.12	SPBC1921.03c	red5	mex67	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.711409396	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027304	2540291	2541609	276822	278106	SPBC337.12	SPAC22F8.10c	red5	sap145	SPBC337.12	SF3b145	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.655574043	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027305	2540291	2539687	276822	276242	SPBC337.12	SPBC1711.05	red5	SPBC1711.05	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.651884701	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027306	2540291	3361269	276822	280345	SPBC337.12	SPBC31A8.01c	red5	rtn1	SPBC337.12	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.493506494	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027307	2540291	2542351	276822	278816	SPBC337.12	SPAC57A7.06	red5	SPAC57A7.06	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.458557589	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027308	2540291	3361260	276822	280336	SPBC337.12	SPBP22H7.07	red5	prp5	SPBC337.12	cwf1|pi024|SPACTOKYO_453.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.342494715	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027309	2540291	2539535	276822	276097	SPBC337.12	SPCC364.01	red5	cif1	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.25	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027310	2540291	2541126	276822	277641	SPBC337.12	SPBC651.01c	red5	nog1	SPBC337.12	SPBC725.18c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.230529595	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027311	2540291	2541216	276822	277730	SPBC337.12	SPBC776.09	red5	ste13	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.18556701	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027312	2540291	2542554	276822	279011	SPBC337.12	SPAC1952.03	red5	otu2	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.172839506	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027313	2540291	2541972	276822	278457	SPBC337.12	SPAC23C11.11	red5	cka1	SPBC337.12	orb5	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.024096386	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027314	2540291	2538940	276822	275515	SPBC337.12	SPCC1620.07c	red5	lnp1	SPBC337.12	SPCC1620.07c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.988023952	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027315	2540291	2541850	276822	278341	SPBC337.12	SPAC22E12.18	red5	SPAC22E12.18	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.952380952	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027316	2540291	2539984	276822	276528	SPBC337.12	SPBC1289.11	red5	spf38	SPBC337.12	cwf17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.882352941	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027317	2540291	2540237	276822	276769	SPBC337.12	SPBC32F12.06	red5	pch1	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.847953216	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027318	2540291	2542790	276822	279239	SPBC337.12	SPAC1687.03c	red5	rfc4	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.847953216	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027319	2540291	2543333	276822	279756	SPBC337.12	SPAC694.02	red5	SPAC694.02	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.824111823	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027320	2540291	2543484	276822	279904	SPBC337.12	SPAC959.03c	red5	SPAC959.03c	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.769230769	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027321	2540291	2541755	276822	278249	SPBC337.12	SPAC2F7.11	red5	nrd1	SPBC337.12	msa2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.671077505	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027322	2540291	2538974	276822	275548	SPBC337.12	SPCC550.02c	red5	cwf5	SPBC337.12	ecm2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.649717514	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027323	2540291	2539205	276822	275775	SPBC337.12	SPCC4B3.15	red5	mid1	SPBC337.12	dmf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.434782609	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027324	2540291	2540888	276822	277405	SPBC337.12	SPBC4F6.13c	red5	SPBC4F6.13c	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.434782609	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027325	2540291	2542610	276822	279064	SPBC337.12	SPAC1B9.03c	red5	SPAC1B9.03c	SPBC337.12	SPAC6B12.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.141388175	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027326	2540291	2539968	276822	276512	SPBC337.12	SPBC16E9.10c	red5	SPBC16E9.10c	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.13478819	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027327	2540291	2541434	276822	277939	SPBC337.12	SPAC27E2.03c	red5	SPAC27E2.03c	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.102040816	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027328	2540291	2540677	276822	277202	SPBC337.12	SPBC21B10.03c	red5	ath1	SPBC337.12	SPBC21B10.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.056890013	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC337.12	-	BIOGRID
1027329	2541143	2543254	277658	279682	SPBC725.08	SPAC1006.03c	pir2	red1	SPBC725.08|ars2	iss3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	163.8655462	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027330	2541143	2542173	277658	278648	SPBC725.08	SPAC17H9.02	pir2	mtl1	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPAC17H9.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	135.9223301	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027331	2541143	2542002	277658	278486	SPBC725.08	SPAC2G11.08c	pir2	smn1	SPBC725.08|ars2	yab8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	111.8421053	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027332	2541143	2540330	277658	276860	SPBC725.08	SPBC3E7.14	pir2	smf1	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPBC4F6.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	102.5641026	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027333	2541143	2542636	277658	279090	SPBC725.08	SPAP27G11.13c	pir2	nop10	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	93.75	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027334	2541143	2539105	277658	275677	SPBC725.08	SPCC1739.07	pir2	cti1	SPBC725.08|ars2	lrp1|rrp47	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	90.22556391	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027335	2541143	2540479	277658	277007	SPBC725.08	SPBC2D10.10c	pir2	fib1	SPBC725.08|ars2	fib|nop1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	88.52459016	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027336	2541143	2542369	277658	278833	SPBC725.08	SPAC1782.10c	pir2	nhp2	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	84.41558442	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027337	2541143	2541655	277658	278151	SPBC725.08	SPAC7D4.14c	pir2	iss10	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	78.0399274	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027338	2541143	2543630	277658	280044	SPBC725.08	SPAC1F3.01	pir2	rrp6	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPAC3H8.11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	73.35907336	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027339	2541143	2539733	277658	276285	SPBC725.08	SPBC16E9.12c	pir2	pab2	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	72.28915663	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027340	2541143	2542015	277658	278498	SPBC725.08	SPAC2G11.15c	pir2	tgs1	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPAC521.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	66.94560669	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027341	2541143	2540855	277658	277372	SPBC725.08	SPBC4B4.05	pir2	smg1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	64.93506494	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027342	2541143	2542480	277658	278940	SPBC725.08	SPAC2C4.03c	pir2	smd2	SPBC725.08|ars2	cwf9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	60.86956522	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027343	2541143	2541087	277658	277602	SPBC725.08	SPBC646.10c	pir2	SPBC646.10c	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	56.33802817	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027344	2541143	2541519	277658	278020	SPBC725.08	SPAC227.07c	pir2	pab1	SPBC725.08|ars2	ret1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	53.59877489	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027345	2541143	2542214	277658	278688	SPBC725.08	SPACUNK4.11c	pir2	mpp6	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPACUNK4.11c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	53.19148936	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027346	2541143	2539660	277658	276215	SPBC725.08	SPBC115.01c	pir2	rrp46	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	53.09734513	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027347	2541143	2540291	277658	276822	SPBC725.08	SPBC337.12	pir2	red5	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPBC337.12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	53.05039788	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027348	2541143	2538863	277658	275443	SPBC725.08	SPCC1682.03c	pir2	mug174	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	52.71565495	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027349	2541143	2540412	277658	276940	SPBC725.08	SPBC211.08c	pir2	mtr3	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPBC211.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	50.58365759	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027350	2541143	2542663	277658	279116	SPBC725.08	SPAC607.03c	pir2	snu13	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	48.0	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027351	2541143	2542684	277658	279137	SPBC725.08	SPAC26A3.08	pir2	smb1	SPBC725.08|ars2	smb	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	47.61904762	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027352	2541143	2539106	277658	275678	SPBC725.08	SPCC757.08	pir2	rrp45	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPCC757.08	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	44.67353952	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027353	2541143	2539540	277658	276102	SPBC725.08	SPCC736.12c	pir2	mmi1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	43.03278689	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027354	2541143	2541910	277658	278400	SPBC725.08	SPAC23C4.15	pir2	rpb5	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	42.85714286	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027355	2541143	2542690	277658	279143	SPBC725.08	SPAC27D7.07c	pir2	smd1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	42.73504274	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027356	2541143	2540705	277658	277228	SPBC725.08	SPBC20F10.01	pir2	gar1	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPBC25H2.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	41.2371134	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027357	2541143	2540189	277658	276722	SPBC725.08	SPBC17D1.03c	pir2	rrp43	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPBC17D1.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	40.74074074	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027358	2541143	2541099	277658	277614	SPBC725.08	SPBC646.04	pir2	pla1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	40.6360424	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027359	2541143	2541813	277658	278304	SPBC725.08	SPAC2F7.14c	pir2	rrp4	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPAC2F7.14c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	36.47416413	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027360	2541143	2539607	277658	276165	SPBC725.08	SPBC11G11.06c	pir2	sme1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	35.71428571	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027361	2541143	2541814	277658	278305	SPBC725.08	SPAC23G3.06	pir2	SPAC23G3.06	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	35.43307087	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027362	2541143	2539743	277658	276295	SPBC725.08	SPBC16A3.08c	pir2	oga1	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPBC16A3.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	35.21126761	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027363	2541143	2540565	277658	277092	SPBC725.08	SPBC1D7.04	pir2	mlo3	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	35.1758794	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027364	2541143	2541062	277658	277577	SPBC725.08	SPBC660.11	pir2	tcg1	SPBC725.08|ars2	mug187	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	34.48275862	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027365	2541143	2540368	277658	276897	SPBC725.08	SPBC36.05c	pir2	clr6	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	32.09876543	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027366	2541143	2540398	277658	276926	SPBC725.08	SPBC26H8.10	pir2	dis3	SPBC725.08|ars2	rrp44	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	31.95876289	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027367	2541143	2540884	277658	277401	SPBC725.08	SPBC19C2.14	pir2	smd3	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	30.92783505	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027368	2541143	2539499	277658	276062	SPBC725.08	SPCC622.08c	pir2	hta1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	30.3030303	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027369	2541143	2539885	277658	276431	SPBC725.08	SPBC16H5.15	pir2	SPBC16H5.15	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	30.12048193	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027370	2541143	2540912	277658	277428	SPBC725.08	SPBC557.02c	pir2	SPBC557.02c	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	29.55665025	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027371	2541143	2541619	277658	278116	SPBC725.08	SPAC27F1.09c	pir2	prp10	SPBC725.08|ars2	sap155|SF3b155	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	29.46127946	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027372	2541143	2539730	277658	276282	SPBC725.08	SPBC1861.08c	pir2	lea1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	29.28870293	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027373	2541143	2541837	277658	278328	SPBC725.08	SPAC22A12.12c	pir2	rrp40	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPAC22A12.12c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	29.16666667	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027374	2541143	2541214	277658	277728	SPBC725.08	SPBC839.07	pir2	ibp1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	28.98550725	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027375	2541143	2542481	277658	278941	SPBC725.08	SPAC29A4.04c	pir2	cbf5	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	27.42616034	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027376	2541143	2542325	277658	278791	SPBC725.08	SPAC16C9.04c	pir2	mot2	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	26.58486708	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027377	2541143	2543227	277658	279655	SPBC725.08	SPAPB8E5.09	pir2	rvb1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	26.31578947	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027378	2541143	2542507	277658	278965	SPBC725.08	SPAC18G6.13	pir2	SPAC18G6.13	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	26.31578947	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027379	2541143	2542256	277658	278726	SPBC725.08	SPAC29A4.08c	pir2	prp19	SPBC725.08|ars2	cwf8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	24.59016393	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027380	2541143	2539115	277658	275687	SPBC725.08	SPCC1235.07	pir2	fta7	SPBC725.08|ars2	cnl3|sma7	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	24.59016393	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027381	2541143	2542134	277658	278610	SPBC725.08	SPAC18G6.06	pir2	SPAC18G6.06	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	24.09638554	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027382	2541143	2542799	277658	279247	SPBC725.08	SPAC1687.01	pir2	rpc19	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPAPYUL23.01|rpa17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	24.0	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027383	2541143	2540966	277658	277482	SPBC725.08	SPBC3D6.09	pir2	dpb4	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	23.80952381	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027384	2541143	2541281	277658	277794	SPBC725.08	SPBC902.04	pir2	rmn1	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPBC902.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	23.76910017	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027385	2541143	2543079	277658	279512	SPBC725.08	SPAC343.04c	pir2	SPAC343.04c	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	23.66863905	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027386	2541143	2539869	277658	276415	SPBC725.08	SPBC11B10.09	pir2	cdc2	SPBC725.08|ars2	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	23.56902357	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027387	2541143	9406966	277658	1028329	SPBC725.08	SPCC16C4.22	pir2	SPCC16C4.22	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPNCRNA.470|SPNG2185	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	22.98850575	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027388	2541143	2542715	277658	279168	SPBC725.08	SPAC25H1.08c	pir2	SPAC25H1.08c	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	22.55639098	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027389	2541143	2540711	277658	277234	SPBC725.08	SPBC215.12	pir2	cwf10	SPBC725.08|ars2	snu114|spef2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	22.38046796	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027390	2541143	2543409	277658	279831	SPBC725.08	SPAC4D7.13	pir2	usp104	SPBC725.08|ars2	prp40	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	21.58273381	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027391	2541143	2540753	277658	277274	SPBC725.08	SPBC211.02c	pir2	cwf3	SPBC725.08|ars2	syf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	21.51898734	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027392	2541143	2540778	277658	277297	SPBC725.08	SPBC19G7.10c	pir2	SPBC19G7.10c	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	21.22015915	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027393	2541143	2541487	277658	277989	SPBC725.08	SPAC23D3.08	pir2	usp108	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	20.77151335	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027394	2541143	2543451	277658	279871	SPBC725.08	SPAC3G9.10c	pir2	rrp41	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	20.66115702	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027395	2541143	2538689	277658	275274	SPBC725.08	SPCC1795.11	pir2	sum3	SPBC725.08|ars2	ded1|moc2|slh3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	20.44025157	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027396	2541143	2542621	277658	279075	SPBC725.08	SPAC5H10.05c	pir2	SPAC5H10.05c	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	20.40816327	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027397	2541143	2538897	277658	275475	SPBC725.08	SPCC1183.07	pir2	SPCC1183.07	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	19.52662722	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027398	2541143	2542461	277658	278922	SPBC725.08	SPAC19A8.13	pir2	usp101	SPBC725.08|ars2	snp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	19.15708812	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027399	2541143	2539109	277658	275681	SPBC725.08	SPCC74.03c	pir2	ssp2	SPBC725.08|ars2	ucp9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	19.09722222	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027400	2541143	2539055	277658	275628	SPBC725.08	SPCC16A11.13	pir2	luc7	SPBC725.08|ars2	usp106	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	18.93939394	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027401	2541143	2542482	277658	278942	SPBC725.08	SPAP8A3.06	pir2	uaf2	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPAP8A3.06|ods2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	18.51851852	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027402	2541143	2542795	277658	279243	SPBC725.08	SPAC9G1.05	pir2	aip1	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPAC9G1.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	18.48739496	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027403	2541143	2542443	277658	278905	SPBC725.08	SPAC17G6.13	pir2	slt1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	18.47575058	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027404	2541143	2540622	277658	277148	SPBC725.08	SPBC21C3.05	pir2	sap62	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	18.43317972	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027405	2541143	2540932	277658	277448	SPBC725.08	SPBC36.09	pir2	sap61	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	18.29268293	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027406	2541143	2540324	277658	276854	SPBC725.08	SPBC29A3.16	pir2	rrs1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	18.07228916	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027407	2541143	2541219	277658	277733	SPBC725.08	SPBC8D2.09c	pir2	msl1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	18.01801802	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027408	2541143	2542856	277658	279302	SPBC725.08	SPAC6F12.11c	pir2	sfc1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	17.54385965	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027409	2541143	2542126	277658	278602	SPBC725.08	SPAC1B3.05	pir2	not3	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	17.46031746	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027410	2541143	2540462	277658	276990	SPBC725.08	SPBC29A3.07c	pir2	sap14	SPBC725.08|ars2	sab14|SF3b14a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	17.39130435	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027411	2541143	2539366	277658	275932	SPBC725.08	SPCC16C4.11	pir2	pef1	SPBC725.08|ars2	p31	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	17.36111111	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027412	2541143	2540258	277658	276789	SPBC725.08	SPBC32C12.02	pir2	ste11	SPBC725.08|ars2	aff1|stex	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	17.09401709	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027413	2541143	2542964	277658	279404	SPBC725.08	SPAC12G12.07c	pir2	SPAC12G12.07c	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.99029126	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027414	2541143	2542765	277658	279215	SPBC725.08	SPAC15E1.08	pir2	naa10	SPBC725.08|ars2	ard1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.94915254	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027415	2541143	2541645	277658	278141	SPBC725.08	SPAC1527.03	pir2	SPAC1527.03	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.84210526	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027416	2541143	2542165	277658	278641	SPBC725.08	SPAC1782.08c	pir2	rex3	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.66666667	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027417	2541143	2539791	277658	276341	SPBC725.08	SPBC13A2.01c	pir2	cbc2	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPBC13A2.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.48351648	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027418	2541143	2541600	277658	278097	SPBC725.08	SPAC6F12.17	pir2	rna14	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.37107776	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027419	2541143	2540865	277658	277382	SPBC725.08	SPBC4B4.07c	pir2	usp102	SPBC725.08|ars2	mud1|U1A	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.06425703	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027420	2541143	2540585	277658	277111	SPBC725.08	SPBC28F2.04c	pir2	cwf7	SPBC725.08|ars2	spf27	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.04278075	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027421	2541143	2539794	277658	276344	SPBC725.08	SPBC14C8.12	pir2	rpb8	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.0	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027422	2541143	2538913	277658	275490	SPBC725.08	SPCC31H12.08c	pir2	ccr4	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPCC5E4.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	15.94202899	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027423	2541143	2539523	277658	276085	SPBC725.08	SPCC622.09	pir2	htb1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	15.87301587	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027424	2541143	2543278	277658	279706	SPBC725.08	SPAPJ698.03c	pir2	prp12	SPBC725.08|ars2	sap130|SF3b130	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	15.75456053	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027425	2541143	2540930	277658	277446	SPBC725.08	SPBC354.10	pir2	def1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	15.57632399	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027426	2541143	2541193	277658	277707	SPBC725.08	SPBC776.02c	pir2	dis2	SPBC725.08|ars2	bws1|sds1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	15.29051988	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027427	2541143	2543316	277658	279740	SPBC725.08	SPAPJ691.02	pir2	SPAPJ691.02	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	15.26717557	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027428	2541143	2538843	277658	275424	SPBC725.08	SPCC162.08c	pir2	nup211	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	15.24224279	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027429	2541143	2542632	277658	279086	SPBC725.08	SPAC24H6.05	pir2	cdc25	SPBC725.08|ars2	sal2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	15.10067114	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027430	2541143	2541972	277658	278457	SPBC725.08	SPAC23C11.11	pir2	cka1	SPBC725.08|ars2	orb5	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	15.06024096	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027431	2541143	2541077	277658	277592	SPBC725.08	SPBC83.08	pir2	rvb2	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	15.05376344	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027432	2541143	2542121	277658	278597	SPBC725.08	SPAC17H9.05	pir2	ebp2	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	15.01501502	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027433	2541143	2541056	277658	277571	SPBC725.08	SPBC577.04	pir2	SPBC577.04	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	15.0	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027434	2541143	2540057	277658	276595	SPBC725.08	SPBC16H5.10c	pir2	prp43	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.96598639	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027435	2541143	2542170	277658	278645	SPBC725.08	SPAC17G8.13c	pir2	mst2	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.74201474	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027436	2541143	2543676	277658	280090	SPBC725.08	SPAC9.03c	pir2	brr2	SPBC725.08|ars2	spp41	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.70588235	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027437	2541143	2539833	277658	276382	SPBC725.08	SPBC11G11.04	pir2	trs20	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.70588235	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027438	2541143	2541255	277658	277769	SPBC725.08	SPBC947.02	pir2	apl2	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.64128843	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027439	2541143	2541437	277658	277942	SPBC725.08	SPAC22A12.09c	pir2	sap114	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.55301455	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027440	2541143	2539305	277658	275873	SPBC725.08	SPCC613.07	pir2	SPCC613.07	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.49275362	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027441	2541143	2539050	277658	275623	SPBC725.08	SPCC11E10.08	pir2	rik1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.42307692	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027442	2541143	2541168	277658	277683	SPBC725.08	SPBC6B1.10	pir2	prp17	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.33691756	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027443	2541143	2538888	277658	275466	SPBC725.08	SPCC1322.16	pir2	phb2	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.33691756	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027444	2541143	2543462	277658	279882	SPBC725.08	SPAC644.16	pir2	SPAC644.16	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.21800948	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027445	2541143	2542936	277658	279377	SPBC725.08	SPAC12G12.06c	pir2	SPAC12G12.06c	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	13.77410468	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027446	2541143	2543089	277658	279522	SPBC725.08	SPAC12G12.14c	pir2	pfs2	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	13.7524558	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027447	2541143	2540434	277658	276962	SPBC725.08	SPBC24C6.11	pir2	cwf14	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	13.69863014	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027448	2541143	2543438	277658	279858	SPBC725.08	SPAC8F11.04	pir2	SPAC8F11.04	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	13.40482574	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027449	2541143	2543583	277658	279998	SPBC725.08	SPAC644.12	pir2	cdc5	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	13.21003963	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027450	2541143	2540869	277658	277386	SPBC725.08	SPBC4B4.09	pir2	usp105	SPBC725.08|ars2	prp39	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	13.07189542	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027451	2541143	2543156	277658	279587	SPBC725.08	SPAP8A3.13c	pir2	SPAP8A3.13c	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.79707495	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027452	2541143	2540645	277658	277170	SPBC725.08	SPBC21B10.05c	pir2	pop3	SPBC725.08|ars2	wat1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.7388535	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027453	2541143	2538853	277658	275434	SPBC725.08	SPCC1739.05	pir2	set5	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.53918495	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027454	2541143	2542650	277658	279104	SPBC725.08	SPAC2C4.10c	pir2	csc4	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPAC2C4.10c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.04819277	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027455	2541143	2540071	277658	276609	SPBC725.08	SPBC13E7.10c	pir2	brf1	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPBC30D10.20	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.0	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027456	2541143	2539830	277658	276379	SPBC725.08	SPBC17D1.04	pir2	acr1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.0	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027457	2541143	2540726	277658	277249	SPBC725.08	SPBC216.01c	pir2	psy2	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.96172249	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027458	2541143	2539699	277658	276252	SPBC725.08	SPBC11G11.05	pir2	rpa34	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.95219124	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027459	2541143	2541908	277658	278398	SPBC725.08	SPAC23D3.02	pir2	rfc2	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.76470588	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027460	2541143	2540440	277658	276968	SPBC725.08	SPBC646.12c	pir2	gap1	SPBC725.08|ars2	sar1|src1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.74934726	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027461	2541143	2542038	277658	278520	SPBC725.08	SPAC23C11.03	pir2	SPAC23C11.03	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.70568562	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027462	2541143	2540237	277658	276769	SPBC725.08	SPBC32F12.06	pir2	pch1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.69590643	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027463	2541143	2541609	277658	278106	SPBC725.08	SPAC22F8.10c	pir2	sap145	SPBC725.08|ars2	SF3b145	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.64725458	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027464	2541143	2541364	277658	277875	SPBC725.08	SPBP8B7.11	pir2	nxt3	SPBC725.08|ars2	glp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.52073733	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027465	2541143	2542001	277658	278485	SPBC725.08	SPAC20G8.06	pir2	not1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.42857143	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027466	2541143	2540376	277658	276905	SPBC725.08	SPBC26H8.11c	pir2	SPBC26H8.11c	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.42857143	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027467	2541143	2542081	277658	278558	SPBC725.08	SPAC26H5.04	pir2	SPAC26H5.04	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.40684411	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027468	2541143	2538778	277658	275359	SPBC725.08	SPCC4G3.15c	pir2	not2	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.36363636	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027469	2541143	2538974	277658	275548	SPBC725.08	SPCC550.02c	pir2	cwf5	SPBC725.08|ars2	ecm2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.29943503	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027470	2541143	2543087	277658	279520	SPBC725.08	SPAC30C2.04	pir2	SPAC30C2.04	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.11111111	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027471	2541143	2541280	277658	277793	SPBC725.08	SPBP23A10.07	pir2	rpa2	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.07325383	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027472	2541143	2541289	277658	277802	SPBC725.08	SPBP35G2.09	pir2	usp103	SPBC725.08|ars2	yhc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.98901099	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027473	2541143	2541721	277658	278215	SPBC725.08	SPAC23G3.09	pir2	taf4	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.95890411	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027474	2541143	2539187	277658	275758	SPBC725.08	SPCC16C4.14c	pir2	sfc4	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.93439364	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027475	2541143	2543631	277658	280045	SPBC725.08	SPAC458.02c	pir2	SPAC458.02c	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.68376068	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027476	2541143	2542880	277658	279325	SPBC725.08	SPAC6F12.14	pir2	cut23	SPBC725.08|ars2	apc8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.61946903	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027477	2541143	3361260	277658	280336	SPBC725.08	SPBP22H7.07	pir2	prp5	SPBC725.08|ars2	cwf1|pi024|SPACTOKYO_453.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.57082452	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027478	2541143	2541471	277658	277973	SPBC725.08	SPAC1F5.03c	pir2	SPAC1F5.03c	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.47120419	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027479	2541143	2541440	277658	277945	SPBC725.08	SPAC1565.05	pir2	utp8	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPAC1565.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.34928849	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027480	2541143	2542037	277658	278519	SPBC725.08	SPAC23A1.18c	pir2	mrp51	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.30927835	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027481	2541143	2540400	277658	276928	SPBC725.08	SPBC28F2.02	pir2	mep33	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.2739726	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027482	2541143	2540401	277658	276929	SPBC725.08	SPBC2A9.02	pir2	SPBC2A9.02	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.16949153	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027483	2541143	2540239	277658	276771	SPBC725.08	SPBC32H8.10	pir2	cdk9	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPACTOKYO_453.22	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.15228426	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027484	2541143	2541211	277658	277725	SPBC725.08	SPBC839.10	pir2	usp107	SPBC725.08|ars2	snu71	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.07194245	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027485	2541143	2541944	277658	278431	SPBC725.08	SPAC222.06	pir2	mak16	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.933774834	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027486	2541143	2543686	277658	280100	SPBC725.08	SPAC3C7.14c	pir2	obr1	SPBC725.08|ars2	apt1|uhp1|p25	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.900990099	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027487	2541143	2540514	277658	277042	SPBC725.08	SPBC19F5.02c	pir2	utp4	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.85915493	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027488	2541143	2542744	277658	279194	SPBC725.08	SPAC1565.08	pir2	cdc48	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.81595092	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027489	2541143	2540349	277658	276878	SPBC725.08	SPBC30D10.15	pir2	SPBC30D10.15	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.689922481	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027490	2541143	2540337	277658	276866	SPBC725.08	SPBC28F2.11	pir2	hmo1	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPBC28F2.11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.677419355	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027491	2541143	2543484	277658	279904	SPBC725.08	SPAC959.03c	pir2	SPAC959.03c	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.615384615	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027492	2541143	2541476	277658	277978	SPBC725.08	SPAC2E1P5.05	pir2	rrp9	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPAC2E1P5.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.541984733	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027493	2541143	2541197	277658	277711	SPBC725.08	SPBC839.12	pir2	rpc31	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.523809524	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027494	2541143	2538872	277658	275451	SPBC725.08	SPCC737.04	pir2	SPCC737.04	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.501187648	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027495	2541143	2538997	277658	275571	SPBC725.08	SPCC330.09	pir2	enp2	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPCC330.09	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.463722397	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027496	2541143	2538848	277658	275429	SPBC725.08	SPCC613.12c	pir2	raf1	SPBC725.08|ars2	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.404388715	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027497	2541143	2540149	277658	276686	SPBC725.08	SPBC1289.03c	pir2	spi1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.259259259	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027498	2541143	2540255	277658	276786	SPBC725.08	SPBC336.04	pir2	cdc6	SPBC725.08|ars2	mis10|pol3|pold	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.208103131	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027499	2541143	2543549	277658	279966	SPBC725.08	SPAC890.04c	pir2	SPAC890.04c	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.090909091	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027500	2541143	2539041	277658	275614	SPBC725.08	SPCC18.06c	pir2	caf1	SPBC725.08|ars2	pop2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.036144578	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027501	2541143	2539829	277658	276378	SPBC725.08	SPBC17G9.04c	pir2	nup85	SPBC725.08|ars2	ptr5	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.888888889	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027502	2541143	2543413	277658	279835	SPBC725.08	SPAC4F8.12c	pir2	spp42	SPBC725.08|ars2	cwf6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.887008041	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027503	2541143	2539133	277658	275705	SPBC725.08	SPCC16C4.18c	pir2	taf6	SPBC725.08|ars2	taf50	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.849557522	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027504	2541143	2541682	277658	278178	SPBC725.08	SPAC15F9.02	pir2	seh1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.849557522	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027505	2541143	2541185	277658	277699	SPBC725.08	SPBC6B1.07	pir2	prp1	SPBC725.08|ars2	zer1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.830022075	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027506	2541143	2539984	277658	276528	SPBC725.08	SPBC1289.11	pir2	spf38	SPBC725.08|ars2	cwf17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.823529412	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027507	2541143	2540086	277658	276624	SPBC725.08	SPBC16H5.12c	pir2	SPBC16H5.12c	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.797653959	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027508	2541143	2542520	277658	278978	SPBC725.08	SPAC20G8.09c	pir2	nat10	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPAC20G8.09c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.712487899	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027509	2541143	2540213	277658	276746	SPBC725.08	SPBC17D1.06	pir2	dbp3	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPCC17D1.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.650519031	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027510	2541143	2541668	277658	278164	SPBC725.08	SPAC1F7.02c	pir2	has1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.650519031	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027511	2541143	2538736	277658	275320	SPBC725.08	SPCC1322.12c	pir2	bub1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.620689655	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027512	2541143	2539663	277658	276218	SPBC725.08	SPBC1289.07c	pir2	rpc40	SPBC725.08|ars2	rpa42	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.620689655	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027513	2541143	2540117	277658	276654	SPBC725.08	SPBC1289.12	pir2	usp109	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.522727273	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027514	2541143	2540469	277658	276997	SPBC725.08	SPBC26H8.08c	pir2	grn1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.510638298	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027515	2541143	2539693	277658	276247	SPBC725.08	SPBC1711.07	pir2	SPBC1711.07	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.333333333	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027516	2541143	2541729	277658	278223	SPBC725.08	SPAC22H12.02	pir2	tfg3	SPBC725.08|ars2	taf14	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.298755187	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027517	2541143	2539913	277658	276457	SPBC725.08	SPBC11G11.03	pir2	mrt4	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.298755187	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027518	2541143	2540873	277658	277390	SPBC725.08	SPBC4C3.05c	pir2	nuc1	SPBC725.08|ars2	rpa1|rpa190	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.28892836	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027519	2541143	2538867	277658	275447	SPBC725.08	SPCC1259.12c	pir2	vid30	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPCC1259.12c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.230452675	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027520	2541143	2541274	277658	277788	SPBC725.08	SPBP8B7.20c	pir2	nop2	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPBP8B7.20c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.223684211	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027521	2541143	2541176	277658	277690	SPBC725.08	SPBC776.08c	pir2	utp22	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPBC776.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.204193254	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027522	2541143	2540787	277658	277306	SPBC725.08	SPBC1921.07c	pir2	sgf29	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPBC21D10.13	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.196721311	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027523	2541143	2539285	277658	275853	SPBC725.08	SPCC1672.02c	pir2	sap1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.874015748	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027524	2541143	2539789	277658	276339	SPBC725.08	SPBC1711.16	pir2	pwp1	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPBC1711.16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.751937984	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027525	2541143	2542531	277658	278989	SPBC725.08	SPAC3A12.11c	pir2	cwf2	SPBC725.08|ars2	prp3|cwc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.731958763	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027526	2541143	2540627	277658	277153	SPBC725.08	SPBC25H2.13c	pir2	cdc20	SPBC725.08|ars2	pol2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.730786721	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027527	2541143	2539158	277658	275730	SPBC725.08	SPCC18.12c	pir2	utp23	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.692307692	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027528	2541143	2542948	277658	279388	SPBC725.08	SPAC1006.07	pir2	SPAC1006.07	SPBC725.08|ars2	tif1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.653061224	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027529	2541143	2540971	277658	277487	SPBC725.08	SPBC3D6.12	pir2	dip2	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPBC3D6.12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.592190889	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027530	2541143	2542400	277658	278864	SPBC725.08	SPAC17G6.10	pir2	ssr1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.590132827	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027531	2541143	2540438	277658	276966	SPBC725.08	SPBC2A9.12	pir2	orc6	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPBC2D10.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.575757576	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027532	2541143	2542910	277658	279353	SPBC725.08	SPAC1486.03c	pir2	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.528230866	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027533	2541143	2542217	277658	278691	SPBC725.08	SPAC1B3.13	pir2	nan1	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPAC1B3.13	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.5	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027534	2541143	2541592	277658	278089	SPBC725.08	SPAC6F12.15c	pir2	cut9	SPBC725.08|ars2	dre1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.451564829	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027535	2541143	2540173	277658	276706	SPBC725.08	SPBC106.13	pir2	SPBC106.13	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.425742574	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027536	2541143	2540871	277658	277388	SPBC725.08	SPBC4F6.14	pir2	SPBC4F6.14	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.418397626	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027537	2541143	2538988	277658	275562	SPBC725.08	SPCC188.11	pir2	prp45	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.181328546	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027538	2541143	2541639	277658	278135	SPBC725.08	SPAC6F12.16c	pir2	mtr4	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.162041182	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027539	2541143	2542666	277658	279119	SPBC725.08	SPAC1142.04	pir2	SPAC1142.04	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.072135785	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027540	2541143	2541914	277658	278404	SPBC725.08	SPAC2F3.03c	pir2	rpa49	SPBC725.08|ars2	rpa51	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.058823529	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027541	2541143	2540348	277658	276877	SPBC725.08	SPBC29A10.05	pir2	exo1	SPBC725.08|ars2	mut2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.00525394	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027542	2541143	2543648	277658	280062	SPBC725.08	SPAC4F10.09c	pir2	SPAC4F10.09c	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.976744186	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027543	2541143	2539694	277658	276248	SPBC725.08	SPBC1709.08	pir2	cft1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.93962526	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027544	2541143	2543643	277658	280057	SPBC725.08	SPAC3G9.07c	pir2	hos2	SPBC725.08|ars2	hda1|phd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.912442396	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027545	2541143	2540796	277658	277315	SPBC725.08	SPBC1A4.07c	pir2	sof1	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPBC1A4.07c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.880733945	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027546	2541143	2539352	277658	275918	SPBC725.08	SPCC188.07	pir2	ccq1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.802721088	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027547	2541143	2540543	277658	277070	SPBC725.08	SPBC29A10.06c	pir2	ely5	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.779661017	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027548	2541143	2540268	277658	276799	SPBC725.08	SPBC800.06	pir2	brx1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.779661017	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027549	2541143	2539790	277658	276340	SPBC725.08	SPBC13G1.13	pir2	tfb2	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPBC31F10.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.711409396	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027550	2541143	2540116	277658	276653	SPBC725.08	SPBC16G5.10	pir2	rrp42	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPBC16G5.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.688963211	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027551	2541143	2539299	277658	275867	SPBC725.08	SPCC1672.07	pir2	SPCC1672.07	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.651884701	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027552	2541143	2543323	277658	279746	SPBC725.08	SPAC6B12.10c	pir2	spp1	SPBC725.08|ars2	pri1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.607929515	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027553	2541143	2540643	277658	277168	SPBC725.08	SPBC19G7.06	pir2	mbx1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.564551422	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027554	2541143	2539924	277658	276468	SPBC725.08	SPBC1198.13c	pir2	tfg2	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPBC660.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.51465798	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027555	2541143	2542883	277658	279328	SPBC725.08	SPAC1486.04c	pir2	alm1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.369426752	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027556	2541143	2541337	277658	277848	SPBC725.08	SPBP35G2.13c	pir2	swc2	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.329113924	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027557	2541143	2543500	277658	279918	SPBC725.08	SPAC926.08c	pir2	SPAC926.08c	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.309148265	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027558	2541143	2539420	277658	275985	SPBC725.08	SPCC970.07c	pir2	raf2	SPBC725.08|ars2	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.289308176	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027559	2541143	2543037	277658	279472	SPBC725.08	SPAC4G9.04c	pir2	pcf11	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPAC4G9.04c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.269592476	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027560	2541143	2543011	277658	279449	SPBC725.08	SPAC10F6.11c	pir2	atg17	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.237006237	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027561	2541143	2541126	277658	277641	SPBC725.08	SPBC651.01c	pir2	nog1	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPBC725.18c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.230529595	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027562	2541143	2540227	277658	276759	SPBC725.08	SPBC31F10.14c	pir2	hip3	SPBC725.08|ars2	hir3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.134969325	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027563	2541143	2540544	277658	277071	SPBC725.08	SPBC25B2.05	pir2	mis3	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.116207951	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027564	2541143	2542587	277658	279042	SPBC725.08	SPAC18B11.06	pir2	lcp5	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPAC18B11.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.116207951	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027565	2541143	2542869	277658	279314	SPBC725.08	SPAC140.02	pir2	gar2	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.0	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027566	2541143	2540471	277658	276999	SPBC725.08	SPBC19F8.07	pir2	mcs6	SPBC725.08|ars2	cdk7|crk1|mop1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.970149254	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027567	2541143	2540328	277658	276858	SPBC725.08	SPBC31F10.11c	pir2	cwf4	SPBC725.08|ars2	syf3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.934718101	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027568	2541143	2539248	277658	275818	SPBC725.08	SPCC1739.03	pir2	hrr1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.911330049	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027569	2541143	2541182	277658	277696	SPBC725.08	SPBC713.04c	pir2	pwp2	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPBC713.04c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.854800937	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027570	2541143	2541493	277658	277995	SPBC725.08	SPAC27E2.10c	pir2	rfc3	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPAPJ698.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.847953216	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027571	2541143	2541873	277658	278363	SPBC725.08	SPAC22G7.10	pir2	iss1	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPAC22G7.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.813953488	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027572	2541143	2539398	277658	275963	SPBC725.08	SPCC965.10	pir2	SPCC965.10	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.714285714	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027573	2541143	2541755	277658	278249	SPBC725.08	SPAC2F7.11	pir2	nrd1	SPBC725.08|ars2	msa2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.671077505	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027574	2541143	2542000	277658	278484	SPBC725.08	SPAC20H4.06c	pir2	SPAC20H4.06c	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.617977528	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027575	2541143	2538760	277658	275343	SPBC725.08	SPCC970.01	pir2	rad16	SPBC725.08|ars2	rad10|rad20|swi9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.605381166	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027576	2541143	2540284	277658	276815	SPBC725.08	SPBC23E6.04c	pir2	utp10	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.457853244	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027577	2541143	2540436	277658	276964	SPBC725.08	SPBC28F2.10c	pir2	ngg1	SPBC725.08|ars2	ada3|kap1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.444646098	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027578	2541143	2542965	277658	279405	SPBC725.08	SPAC3G6.04	pir2	rnp24	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.420054201	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027579	2541143	2540219	277658	276752	SPBC725.08	SPBC31F10.13c	pir2	hip1	SPBC725.08|ars2	hir1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.364806867	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027580	2541143	2540234	277658	276766	SPBC725.08	SPBC336.12c	pir2	cdc10	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.215123859	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027581	2541143	2540220	277658	276753	SPBC725.08	SPBC337.03	pir2	rhn1	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPBC337.03|iss4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.167958656	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027582	2541143	2541163	277658	277678	SPBC725.08	SPBC83.15	pir2	SPBC83.15	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.167958656	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027583	2541143	2542258	277658	278727	SPBC725.08	SPAC17G6.16c	pir2	ysh1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.161290323	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027584	2541143	2541434	277658	277939	SPBC725.08	SPAC27E2.03c	pir2	SPAC27E2.03c	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.102040816	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027585	2541143	2540231	277658	276763	SPBC725.08	SPBC336.14c	pir2	ppk26	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.093378608	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027586	2541143	2542822	277658	279269	SPBC725.08	SPAC13F5.02c	pir2	ptr6	SPBC725.08|ars2	taf7	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.089058524	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027587	2541143	2540465	277658	276993	SPBC725.08	SPBC29A3.03c	pir2	SPBC29A3.03c	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.025125628	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027588	2541143	2541654	277658	278150	SPBC725.08	SPAC22G7.05	pir2	kri1	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPAC22G7.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.016722408	-	-	C-terminally 3xFLAG-tagged SPBC725.08	-	BIOGRID
1027589	2541655	2543254	278151	279682	SPAC7D4.14c	SPAC1006.03c	iss10	red1	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	iss3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	128.8515406	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPAC7D4.14c	-	BIOGRID
1027590	2541655	2542173	278151	278648	SPAC7D4.14c	SPAC17H9.02	iss10	mtl1	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	SPAC17H9.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	100.0	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPAC7D4.14c	-	BIOGRID
1027591	2541655	2540291	278151	276822	SPAC7D4.14c	SPBC337.12	iss10	red5	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	SPBC337.12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	34.48275862	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPAC7D4.14c	-	BIOGRID
1027592	2541655	2541077	278151	277592	SPAC7D4.14c	SPBC83.08	iss10	rvb2	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	19.35483871	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPAC7D4.14c	-	BIOGRID
1027593	2541655	2541519	278151	278020	SPAC7D4.14c	SPAC227.07c	iss10	pab1	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	ret1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	18.37672282	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPAC7D4.14c	-	BIOGRID
1027594	2541655	2541281	278151	277794	SPAC7D4.14c	SPBC902.04	iss10	rmn1	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	SPBC902.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	13.58234295	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPAC7D4.14c	-	BIOGRID
1027595	2541655	2538689	278151	275274	SPAC7D4.14c	SPCC1795.11	iss10	sum3	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	ded1|moc2|slh3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.57861635	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPAC7D4.14c	-	BIOGRID
1027596	2541655	2539733	278151	276285	SPAC7D4.14c	SPBC16E9.12c	iss10	pab2	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	12.04819277	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPAC7D4.14c	-	BIOGRID
1027597	2541655	2542764	278151	279214	SPAC7D4.14c	SPAC15E1.10	iss10	SPAC15E1.10	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	SPAP7G5.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	11.32075472	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPAC7D4.14c	-	BIOGRID
1027598	2541655	2542214	278151	278688	SPAC7D4.14c	SPACUNK4.11c	iss10	mpp6	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	SPACUNK4.11c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.63829787	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPAC7D4.14c	-	BIOGRID
1027599	2541655	2542443	278151	278905	SPAC7D4.14c	SPAC17G6.13	iss10	slt1	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	9.237875289	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPAC7D4.14c	-	BIOGRID
1027600	2541655	2541143	278151	277658	SPAC7D4.14c	SPBC725.08	iss10	pir2	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	SPBC725.08|ars2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.210180624	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPAC7D4.14c	-	BIOGRID
1027601	2541655	2542948	278151	279388	SPAC7D4.14c	SPAC1006.07	iss10	SPAC1006.07	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	tif1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.653061224	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPAC7D4.14c	-	BIOGRID
1027602	2541655	2540398	278151	276926	SPAC7D4.14c	SPBC26H8.10	iss10	dis3	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	rrp44	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.216494845	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPAC7D4.14c	-	BIOGRID
1027603	2541655	2541639	278151	278135	SPAC7D4.14c	SPAC6F12.16c	iss10	mtr4	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.162041182	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPAC7D4.14c	-	BIOGRID
1027604	2541655	2539540	278151	276102	SPAC7D4.14c	SPCC736.12c	iss10	mmi1	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.147540984	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPAC7D4.14c	-	BIOGRID
1027605	2541655	2541813	278151	278304	SPAC7D4.14c	SPAC2F7.14c	iss10	rrp4	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	SPAC2F7.14c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.079027356	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPAC7D4.14c	-	BIOGRID
1027606	2541655	2541087	278151	277602	SPAC7D4.14c	SPBC646.10c	iss10	SPBC646.10c	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.036217304	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPAC7D4.14c	-	BIOGRID
1027607	2541655	2541099	278151	277614	SPAC7D4.14c	SPBC646.04	iss10	pla1	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	5.300353357	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPAC7D4.14c	-	BIOGRID
1027608	2541281	2541519	277794	278020	SPBC902.04	SPAC227.07c	rmn1	pab1	SPBC902.04	ret1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	52.06738132	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPBC902.04	-	BIOGRID
1027609	2541281	2538984	277794	275558	SPBC902.04	SPCC1753.05	rmn1	rsm1	SPBC902.04	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	37.16216216	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPBC902.04	-	BIOGRID
1027610	2541281	2539733	277794	276285	SPBC902.04	SPBC16E9.12c	rmn1	pab2	SPBC902.04	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	30.12048193	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPBC902.04	-	BIOGRID
1027611	2541281	2543254	277794	279682	SPBC902.04	SPAC1006.03c	rmn1	red1	SPBC902.04	iss3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	29.41176471	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPBC902.04	-	BIOGRID
1027612	2541281	2540291	277794	276822	SPBC902.04	SPBC337.12	rmn1	red5	SPBC902.04	SPBC337.12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	23.87267905	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPBC902.04	-	BIOGRID
1027613	2541281	2540884	277794	277401	SPBC902.04	SPBC19C2.14	rmn1	smd3	SPBC902.04	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	20.6185567	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPBC902.04	-	BIOGRID
1027614	2541281	2540565	277794	277092	SPBC902.04	SPBC1D7.04	rmn1	mlo3	SPBC902.04	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	20.10050251	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPBC902.04	-	BIOGRID
1027615	2541281	2542463	277794	278924	SPBC902.04	SPAC1834.03c	rmn1	hhf1	SPBC902.04	h4.1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	19.41747573	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPBC902.04	-	BIOGRID
1027616	2541281	2539863	277794	276410	SPBC902.04	SPBC14F5.03c	rmn1	kap123	SPBC902.04	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	18.74414246	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPBC902.04	-	BIOGRID
1027617	2541281	2542480	277794	278940	SPBC902.04	SPAC2C4.03c	rmn1	smd2	SPBC902.04	cwf9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	17.39130435	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPBC902.04	-	BIOGRID
1027618	2541281	2542173	277794	278648	SPBC902.04	SPAC17H9.02	rmn1	mtl1	SPBC902.04	SPAC17H9.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	16.50485437	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPBC902.04	-	BIOGRID
1027619	2541281	2542467	277794	278928	SPBC902.04	SPAC1834.04	rmn1	hht1	SPBC902.04	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.70588235	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPBC902.04	-	BIOGRID
1027620	2541281	2541655	277794	278151	SPBC902.04	SPAC7D4.14c	rmn1	iss10	SPBC902.04	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.51905626	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPBC902.04	-	BIOGRID
1027621	2541281	2538689	277794	275274	SPBC902.04	SPCC1795.11	rmn1	sum3	SPBC902.04	ded1|moc2|slh3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	14.1509434	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPBC902.04	-	BIOGRID
1027622	2541281	2538843	277794	275424	SPBC902.04	SPCC162.08c	rmn1	nup211	SPBC902.04	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	10.34295046	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPBC902.04	-	BIOGRID
1027623	2541281	2541062	277794	277577	SPBC902.04	SPBC660.11	rmn1	tcg1	SPBC902.04	mug187	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.620689655	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPBC902.04	-	BIOGRID
1027624	2541281	2539540	277794	276102	SPBC902.04	SPCC736.12c	rmn1	mmi1	SPBC902.04	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	8.196721311	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPBC902.04	-	BIOGRID
1027625	2541281	2542948	277794	279388	SPBC902.04	SPAC1006.07	rmn1	SPAC1006.07	SPBC902.04	tif1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	7.653061224	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPBC902.04	-	BIOGRID
1027626	2541281	2542481	277794	278941	SPBC902.04	SPAC29A4.04c	rmn1	cbf5	SPBC902.04	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Egan ED (2014)	24713849	284812	284812	High Throughput	6.329113924	-	-	C-terminally 13xmyc-tagged SPBC902.04	-	BIOGRID
1028741	2543583	2541686	279998	278182	SPAC644.12	SPAC29E6.02	cdc5	prp3	-	SPAC30.06	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Collier SE (2014)	25263959	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Figure 1|cdc5-120 prp3-1	-	BIOGRID
1028743	2543583	3361572	279998	280648	SPAC644.12	SPSNRNA.06	cdc5	snu6	-	-	Protein-RNA	physical	Collier SE (2014)	25263959	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 4	-	BIOGRID
1029011	2541247	2540361	277761	276890	SPBC947.12	SPBC2F12.13	kms2	klp5	-	sot1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Waelde S (2014)	24963130	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1|identified by mass spec	-	BIOGRID
1029012	2541247	2543399	277761	279821	SPBC947.12	SPAC3G9.12	kms2	peg1	-	cls1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Waelde S (2014)	24963130	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1|identified by mass spec	-	BIOGRID
1029013	2541247	2540690	277761	277215	SPBC947.12	SPBC428.20c	kms2	alp6	-	SPBC902.01c	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Waelde S (2014)	24963130	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1|identified by mass spec	-	BIOGRID
1029014	2541247	2543372	277761	279794	SPBC947.12	SPAPB1A10.09	kms2	ase1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Waelde S (2014)	24963130	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S1|identified by mass spec	-	BIOGRID
1029015	2539020	3361561	275593	280637	SPCC5E4.06	SPAC11E3.01c	smc6	swr1	rad18	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tapia-Alveal C (2014)	24687850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	Figure 3|swr1 deletion rescues MMS and HU sensitivity of smc6-74 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1029016	3361561	2540541	280637	277068	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC1A4.03c	swr1	top2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	ptr11	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tapia-Alveal C (2014)	24687850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	Figure 3|swr1 top2-191 is synthetic lethal	-	BIOGRID
1029017	2539020	2543563	275593	279979	SPCC5E4.06	SPAC664.02c	smc6	arp8	rad18	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tapia-Alveal C (2014)	24687850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	Figure 3|arp8 deletion rescues MMS and HU sensitivity of smc6-74 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1029018	2543563	2540541	279979	277068	SPAC664.02c	SPBC1A4.03c	arp8	top2	-	ptr11	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tapia-Alveal C (2014)	24687850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	Figure 3|arp8 top2-191 is synthetic lethal	-	BIOGRID
1029019	2539020	2542366	275593	278830	SPCC5E4.06	SPAC1783.04c	smc6	hst4	rad18	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tapia-Alveal C (2014)	24687850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	Figure 4|hst4 deletion rescues MMS and HU sensitivity of smc6-74 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1029020	2539020	2540945	275593	277461	SPCC5E4.06	SPBC342.06c	smc6	rtt109	rad18	kat11	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tapia-Alveal C (2014)	24687850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 4|rtt109 smc6-74 has increased sensitivity to HU and MMS	-	BIOGRID
1029096	2540945	2539668	277461	276223	SPBC342.06c	SPBC11B10.10c	rtt109	pht1	kat11	pi001	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tapia-Alveal C (2014)	24687850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	Figure 4|genetic complex|pht1 deletion rescues rtt109 smc6-74 double mutant sensitivity to HU and MMS	-	BIOGRID
1029103	2539020	2541220	275593	277734	SPCC5E4.06	SPBC8D2.04	smc6	hht2	rad18	h3.2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tapia-Alveal C (2014)	24687850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 4|H3K56R mutation enhances HU and MMS sensitivity of smc6-74 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1029104	2539020	2541220	275593	277734	SPCC5E4.06	SPBC8D2.04	smc6	hht2	rad18	h3.2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tapia-Alveal C (2014)	24687850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	Figure 4|H3K56Q mutation suppresses HU and MMS sensitivity of smc6-74 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1029106	2539020	2539668	275593	276223	SPCC5E4.06	SPBC11B10.10c	smc6	pht1	rad18	pi001	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tapia-Alveal C (2014)	24687850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:wild type|mitotic cell cycle:wild type	Figure 7|Table 4|pht1 deletion suppresses cohesin retention on chromosome arms in smc6-74 mutant|pht1 deletion suppresses mitotic defects in smc6-74 mutant|top2-191 mis4-242 background	-	BIOGRID
1029107	2539020	3361561	275593	280637	SPCC5E4.06	SPAC11E3.01c	smc6	swr1	rad18	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tapia-Alveal C (2014)	24687850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:wild type	Table 4|swr1 deletion suppresses mitotic defects in smc6-74 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1029108	2539020	2543563	275593	279979	SPCC5E4.06	SPAC664.02c	smc6	arp8	rad18	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tapia-Alveal C (2014)	24687850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:wild type	Table 4|arp8 deletion suppresses mitotic defects in smc6-74 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1029109	2539020	2542366	275593	278830	SPCC5E4.06	SPAC1783.04c	smc6	hst4	rad18	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tapia-Alveal C (2014)	24687850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:wild type	Table 4|hst4 deletion suppresses mitotic defects in smc6-74 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1029110	2539020	2540945	275593	277461	SPCC5E4.06	SPBC342.06c	smc6	rtt109	rad18	kat11	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tapia-Alveal C (2014)	24687850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	Table 4|rtt109 deletion enhances mitotic defects in smc6-74 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1029111	2539020	2539668	275593	276223	SPCC5E4.06	SPBC11B10.10c	smc6	pht1	rad18	pi001	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tapia-Alveal C (2014)	24687850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	Table 4|genetic complex|pht1 deletion suppresses mitotic defects in rtt109 smc6-74 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
1029112	2540945	2539668	277461	276223	SPBC342.06c	SPBC11B10.10c	rtt109	pht1	kat11	pi001	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tapia-Alveal C (2014)	24687850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	Table 4|genetic complex|pht1 deletion suppresses mitotic defects in rtt109 smc6-74 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
1029113	2539020	2541220	275593	277734	SPCC5E4.06	SPBC8D2.04	smc6	hht2	rad18	h3.2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tapia-Alveal C (2014)	24687850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	H3K56R mutation enhances mitotic defects in smc6-74 mutant|Table 4	-	BIOGRID
1029114	2539020	2541220	275593	277734	SPCC5E4.06	SPBC8D2.04	smc6	hht2	rad18	h3.2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tapia-Alveal C (2014)	24687850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:wild type	H3K56Q mutation suppresses mitotic defects in smc6-74 mutant|Table 4	-	BIOGRID
1029483	2541606	2541606	278103	278103	SPAC11H11.04	SPAC11H11.04	mam2	mam2	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Lock A (2014)	25157670	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	oligomerization detected via TOXCAT assay	-	BIOGRID
1029484	2541124	2542222	277639	278695	SPBC646.02	SPAC31G5.18c	cwf11	sde2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Figure 4	-	BIOGRID
1029485	2541124	2542806	277639	279254	SPBC646.02	SPAC1610.01	cwf11	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Figure 4	-	BIOGRID
1029486	2541124	2539395	277639	275960	SPBC646.02	SPCC663.11	cwf11	saf1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Figure 4	-	BIOGRID
1029487	2542207	2539481	278682	276044	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC622.16c	ddb1	epe1	-	kdm2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	Figure 6|epe1 deletion restores silencing in ddb1 mutant|spd1 null background	-	BIOGRID
1029488	2540352	2539481	276881	276044	SPBC215.03c	SPCC622.16c	csn1	epe1	-	kdm2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	Figure 6|epe1 deletion restores silencing in csn1 mutant|spd1 null background	-	BIOGRID
1029489	3361420	2539481	280496	276044	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPCC622.16c	csn2	epe1	-	kdm2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	Figure 6|epe1 deletion restores silencing in csn2 mutant|spd1 null background	-	BIOGRID
1029490	2542806	2540884	279254	277401	SPAC1610.01	SPBC19C2.14	saf5	smd3	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 1	-	BIOGRID
1029491	2542806	2542684	279254	279137	SPAC1610.01	SPAC26A3.08	saf5	smb1	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	smb	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 1	-	BIOGRID
1029492	2542806	2542690	279254	279143	SPAC1610.01	SPAC27D7.07c	saf5	smd1	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 1	-	BIOGRID
1029493	2542806	2542480	279254	278940	SPAC1610.01	SPAC2C4.03c	saf5	smd2	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	cwf9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 1	-	BIOGRID
1029494	2542806	2542002	279254	278486	SPAC1610.01	SPAC2G11.08c	saf5	smn1	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	yab8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 1	-	BIOGRID
1029495	2542806	2543413	279254	279835	SPAC1610.01	SPAC4F8.12c	saf5	spp42	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	cwf6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 1	-	BIOGRID
1029496	2542806	2539607	279254	276165	SPAC1610.01	SPBC11G11.06c	saf5	sme1	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 1	-	BIOGRID
1029497	2542806	2539885	279254	276431	SPAC1610.01	SPBC16H5.15	saf5	SPBC16H5.15	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 1	-	BIOGRID
1029498	2542806	3361408	279254	280484	SPAC1610.01	SPAPB17E12.02	saf5	yip12	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	yip1|yip1-b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 1	-	BIOGRID
1029499	2542806	2540855	279254	277372	SPAC1610.01	SPBC4B4.05	saf5	smg1	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 1	-	BIOGRID
1029500	2542806	2540330	279254	276860	SPAC1610.01	SPBC3E7.14	saf5	smf1	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	SPBC4F6.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 1	-	BIOGRID
1029501	2542806	2543583	279254	279998	SPAC1610.01	SPAC644.12	saf5	cdc5	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 1	-	BIOGRID
1029502	2542806	2542256	279254	278726	SPAC1610.01	SPAC29A4.08c	saf5	prp19	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	cwf8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 1	-	BIOGRID
1029503	2542806	2540328	279254	276858	SPAC1610.01	SPBC31F10.11c	saf5	cwf4	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	syf3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 1	-	BIOGRID
1029504	2542806	2540711	279254	277234	SPAC1610.01	SPBC215.12	saf5	cwf10	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	snu114|spef2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 1	-	BIOGRID
1029505	2542222	2543413	278695	279835	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC4F8.12c	sde2	spp42	-	cwf6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029506	2542222	2543676	278695	280090	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC9.03c	sde2	brr2	-	spp41	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029507	2542222	2541124	278695	277639	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC646.02	sde2	cwf11	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029508	2542222	2540711	278695	277234	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC215.12	sde2	cwf10	-	snu114|spef2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029509	2542222	2543583	278695	279998	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC644.12	sde2	cdc5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029510	2542222	2540753	278695	277274	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC211.02c	sde2	cwf3	-	syf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029511	2542222	2543189	278695	279618	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC30D11.09	sde2	cwf19	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029512	2542222	2540328	278695	276858	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC31F10.11c	sde2	cwf4	-	syf3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029513	2542222	2541168	278695	277683	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC6B1.10	sde2	prp17	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029514	2542222	2542978	278695	279416	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC10F6.02c	sde2	prp22	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029515	2542222	2538988	278695	275562	SPAC31G5.18c	SPCC188.11	sde2	prp45	-	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029516	2542222	2539941	278695	276485	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC13E7.01	sde2	cwf22	-	SPBC15D4.16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029517	2542222	3361260	278695	280336	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBP22H7.07	sde2	prp5	-	cwf1|pi024|SPACTOKYO_453.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029518	2542222	2542531	278695	278989	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC3A12.11c	sde2	cwf2	-	prp3|cwc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029519	2542222	2538974	278695	275548	SPAC31G5.18c	SPCC550.02c	sde2	cwf5	-	ecm2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029520	2542222	2539984	278695	276528	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC1289.11	sde2	spf38	-	cwf17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029521	2542222	2542256	278695	278726	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC29A4.08c	sde2	prp19	-	cwf8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029522	2542222	2540611	278695	277137	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC3E7.13c	sde2	syf2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029523	2542222	2540983	278695	277499	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC337.06c	sde2	cwf15	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029524	2542222	2540230	278695	276762	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC32F12.05c	sde2	cwf12	-	isy1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029525	2542222	2540585	278695	277111	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC28F2.04c	sde2	cwf7	-	spf27	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029526	2542222	2538901	278695	275479	SPAC31G5.18c	SPCP1E11.07c	sde2	cwf18	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029527	2542222	2540434	278695	276962	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC24C6.11	sde2	cwf14	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029528	2542222	2539847	278695	276395	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC530.14c	sde2	dsk1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029529	2542222	2543616	278695	280030	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC4A8.09c	sde2	cwf21	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029530	2542222	2540801	278695	277320	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC18H10.10c	sde2	saf4	-	cwc16|cwf16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029531	2542222	2542772	278695	279221	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC16.02c	sde2	srp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029532	2542222	2542684	278695	279137	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC26A3.08	sde2	smb1	-	smb	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029533	2542222	2541619	278695	278116	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC27F1.09c	sde2	prp10	-	sap155|SF3b155	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029534	2542222	2539683	278695	276238	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC146.05c	sde2	cwf25	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029535	2542222	2538931	278695	275507	SPAC31G5.18c	SPCC1620.10	sde2	cwf26	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029536	2542222	2543278	278695	279706	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAPJ698.03c	sde2	prp12	-	sap130|SF3b130	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029537	2542222	2539818	278695	276368	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC11C11.08	sde2	srp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table 2	-	BIOGRID
1029541	2542123	2539244	278599	275814	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC1672.06c	mal3	asp1	-	vip1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Poehlmann J (2014)	25254656	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	Figure 4|asp1-H397A mutation rescues TBZ sensitivity of mal3 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1029542	2542123	2539244	278599	275814	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC1672.06c	mal3	asp1	-	vip1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Poehlmann J (2014)	25254656	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 4|asp1-D333A mutation or asp1 deletion increases TBZ and MBC sensitivity of mal3 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1029543	2542123	2539244	278599	275814	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC1672.06c	mal3	asp1	-	vip1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Poehlmann J (2014)	25254656	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	Figure 4|asp1 overexpression rescues TBZ sensitivity of mal3 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1029544	2542123	2542890	278599	279334	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC13G6.14	mal3	aps1	-	SPAC24B11.03	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Poehlmann J (2014)	25254656	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Figure 4|aps1 deletion rescues TBZ sensitivity of mal3 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1031870	2538760	2542150	275343	278626	SPCC970.01	SPAC17A5.11	rad16	rec12	rad10|rad20|swi9	spo11	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mastro TL (2014)	25293972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:wild type	Figure 2|rec12 deletion suppresses double-strand breaks seen in rad16-249 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1031938	2541798	2538760	278289	275343	SPAC22F3.03c	SPCC970.01	rdh54	rad16	mug34|tid1	rad10|rad20|swi9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mastro TL (2014)	25293972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue	Figure 3|rad16-249 mutation reduces frequency of intra-homologue exchange in rdh54 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1031939	2540574	2538760	277101	275343	SPBC409.03	SPCC970.01	swi5	rad16	-	rad10|rad20|swi9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Mastro TL (2014)	25293972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation	Figure 3|spore viability is reduced in swi5 rad16-249 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
1031950	2539366	2540673	275932	277198	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC1D7.03	pef1	mug80	p31	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen BR (2013)	23874875	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	data not shown	-	BIOGRID
1031951	2540673	2539208	277198	275778	SPBC1D7.03	SPCC1450.11c	mug80	cek1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chen BR (2013)	23874875	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chronological lifespan	Deletion of cek1+ abolishes the lifespan-extending effect of a clg1 null mutant|figure 5	-	BIOGRID
1031952	2539208	2539366	275778	275932	SPCC1450.11c	SPCC16C4.11	cek1	pef1	-	p31	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen BR (2013)	23874875	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	figure 7	-	BIOGRID
1031953	2540673	3361535	277198	280611	SPBC1D7.03	SPAPB18E9.02c	mug80	ppk18	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chen BR (2013)	23874875	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chronological lifespan	figure 6|the long-lived clg1 mutant and the short-lived ppk18 mutant show an intermediate phenotype	-	BIOGRID
1031974	2538760	2539087	275343	275659	SPCC970.01	SPCC1259.13	rad16	chk1	rad10|rad20|swi9	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mastro TL (2014)	25293972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 4|rad16-249 chk1 double mutant have reduced growth and increased sensitivity to UV, MMS	-	BIOGRID
1031975	2538760	2539087	275343	275659	SPCC970.01	SPCC1259.13	rad16	chk1	rad10|rad20|swi9	rad27	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mastro TL (2014)	25293972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:wild type	Figure 4|chk1 deletion restored cell length distribution of rad16-249 mutant to WT	-	BIOGRID
1031976	2538760	2543580	275343	279995	SPCC970.01	SPAC644.14c	rad16	rad51	rad10|rad20|swi9	rhp51	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Mastro TL (2014)	25293972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	Table 1|rad16-249 allele	-	BIOGRID
1031977	2538760	2539004	275343	275578	SPCC970.01	SPCC4G3.05c	rad16	mus81	rad10|rad20|swi9	slx3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Mastro TL (2014)	25293972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	Table 1|rad16-249 allele	-	BIOGRID
1031978	2538760	2540719	275343	277242	SPCC970.01	SPBC216.05	rad16	rad3	rad10|rad20|swi9	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Mastro TL (2014)	25293972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	Table 1|rad16-249 allele	-	BIOGRID
1031979	2538760	2541620	275343	278117	SPCC970.01	SPAC2G11.12	rad16	rqh1	rad10|rad20|swi9	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Mastro TL (2014)	25293972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	Table 1|rad16-249 allele	-	BIOGRID
1031980	2538760	2540020	275343	276564	SPCC970.01	SPBC16D10.09	rad16	pcn1	rad10|rad20|swi9	pcn	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Mastro TL (2014)	25293972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	Table 1|rad16-249 pcn1-K164R	-	BIOGRID
1031981	2538760	2539686	275343	276241	SPCC970.01	SPBC1734.06	rad16	rhp18	rad10|rad20|swi9	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Mastro TL (2014)	25293972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	Table 1|rad16-249 allele	-	BIOGRID
1031982	2538760	2543164	275343	279595	SPCC970.01	SPAC3G6.06c	rad16	rad2	rad10|rad20|swi9	fen1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mastro TL (2014)	25293972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Table 1|double mutant has increased UV and MMS sensitivity|rad16-249 allele	-	BIOGRID
1031983	2538760	2538720	275343	275304	SPCC970.01	SPCC338.05c	rad16	mms2	rad10|rad20|swi9	spm2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mastro TL (2014)	25293972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Table 1|double mutant has increased UV and MMS sensitivity|rad16-249 allele	-	BIOGRID
1031984	2538760	2542925	275343	279366	SPCC970.01	SPAC11E3.04c	rad16	ubc13	rad10|rad20|swi9	spu13|sst5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mastro TL (2014)	25293972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Table 1|double mutant has increased UV and MMS sensitivity|rad16-249 allele	-	BIOGRID
1031985	2538760	2539547	275343	276108	SPCC970.01	SPCC553.07c	rad16	kpa1	rad10|rad20|swi9	mug40|pol(kappa)|pol-kappa	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mastro TL (2014)	25293972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Table 1|double mutant has increased UV and MMS sensitivity|rad16-249 allele	-	BIOGRID
1031986	2538760	2540679	275343	277204	SPCC970.01	SPBC3D6.10	rad16	apn2	rad10|rad20|swi9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mastro TL (2014)	25293972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Table 1|double mutant has increased UV and MMS sensitivity|rad16-249 allele	-	BIOGRID
1031987	2538760	2543510	275343	279928	SPCC970.01	SPAC30D11.07	rad16	nth1	rad10|rad20|swi9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mastro TL (2014)	25293972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Table 1|double mutant has increased UV and MMS sensitivity|rad16-249 allele	-	BIOGRID
1031988	2538760	2539666	275343	276221	SPCC970.01	SPBC16A3.11	rad16	eso1	rad10|rad20|swi9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mastro TL (2014)	25293972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|vegetative growth	Table 1|double mutant has increased UV sensitivity|rad16-249 allele	-	BIOGRID
1031989	2541635	2541081	278131	277596	SPAC1556.01c	SPBC691.02c	rad50	drp1	SPAP4C9.01c	SPBC691.02c|pi034|SPACTOKYO_453.01	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ranjan R (2014)	25269894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 6	-	BIOGRID
1031990	2541030	2539658	277545	276213	SPBC337.08c	SPBC1105.17	ubi4	cnp1	-	sim2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gonzalez M (2014)	25298518	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 6|likely ubiquitin conjugate	-	BIOGRID
1031992	2539658	2542463	276213	278924	SPBC1105.17	SPAC1834.03c	cnp1	hhf1	sim2	h4.1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Gonzalez M (2014)	25298518	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	Figure 7|H4 overexpression rescues growth defect associated with overexpression of Cnp1	-	BIOGRID
1031993	2539658	2542467	276213	278928	SPBC1105.17	SPAC1834.04	cnp1	hht1	sim2	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Gonzalez M (2014)	25298518	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Figure 7|H3 overexpression enhances growth defect associated with overexpression of Cnp1	-	BIOGRID
1031994	2539799	2542286	276349	278754	SPBC106.11c	SPAC1786.01c	plg7	ptl2	-	SPAC1786.01c|SPAC31G5.20c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Yazawa H (2014)	25109267	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	Claviceps purpurea FAH12 expressed|Table 3|ptl2 overexpression restored doubling time of plg7 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1032144	2540554	2543577	277081	279992	SPBC29A10.03c	SPAC4H3.05	pcf1	srs2	SPBC365.19c|rlf2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pietrobon V (2014)	25313826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	MMS	-	BIOGRID
1032145	2540554	2541620	277081	278117	SPBC29A10.03c	SPAC2G11.12	pcf1	rqh1	SPBC365.19c|rlf2	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pietrobon V (2014)	25313826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	MMS	-	BIOGRID
1032146	2540554	2543580	277081	279995	SPBC29A10.03c	SPAC644.14c	pcf1	rad51	SPBC365.19c|rlf2	rhp51	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pietrobon V (2014)	25313826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	MMS	-	BIOGRID
1032147	2540554	2541620	277081	278117	SPBC29A10.03c	SPAC2G11.12	pcf1	rqh1	SPBC365.19c|rlf2	hus2|rad12|rec9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Pietrobon V (2014)	25313826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1032148	2540554	2541620	277081	278117	SPBC29A10.03c	SPAC2G11.12	pcf1	rqh1	SPBC365.19c|rlf2	hus2|rad12|rec9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Pietrobon V (2014)	25313826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	-	-	BIOGRID
1032149	2542071	2541620	278548	278117	SPAC26H5.03	SPAC2G11.12	pcf2	rqh1	cac2	hus2|rad12|rec9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Pietrobon V (2014)	25313826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	-	-	BIOGRID
1032150	2540554	2542071	277081	278548	SPBC29A10.03c	SPAC26H5.03	pcf1	pcf2	SPBC365.19c|rlf2	cac2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Pietrobon V (2014)	25313826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1032151	2540554	2540020	277081	276564	SPBC29A10.03c	SPBC16D10.09	pcf1	pcn1	SPBC365.19c|rlf2	pcn	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Pietrobon V (2014)	25313826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1032153	3361391	2540554	280467	277081	SPAC13G6.01c	SPBC29A10.03c	rad8	pcf1	SPAC5H10.14c	SPBC365.19c|rlf2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pietrobon V (2014)	25313826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	MMS	-	BIOGRID
1032154	2541620	2540554	278117	277081	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC29A10.03c	rqh1	pcf1	hus2|rad12|rec9	SPBC365.19c|rlf2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Pietrobon V (2014)	25313826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue	MMS	-	BIOGRID
1032155	2541620	2540554	278117	277081	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC29A10.03c	rqh1	pcf1	hus2|rad12|rec9	SPBC365.19c|rlf2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Pietrobon V (2014)	25313826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	HU|pcf1 partially rescues an rqh1 srs2 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
1032156	2541620	2540554	278117	277081	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC29A10.03c	rqh1	pcf1	hus2|rad12|rec9	SPBC365.19c|rlf2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Pietrobon V (2014)	25313826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	camptothecin	-	BIOGRID
1032157	2541620	2543577	278117	279992	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC4H3.05	rqh1	srs2	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pietrobon V (2014)	25313826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
1032158	2543577	2540554	279992	277081	SPAC4H3.05	SPBC29A10.03c	srs2	pcf1	-	SPBC365.19c|rlf2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Pietrobon V (2014)	25313826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	pcf1 partially rescues an rqh1 srs2 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
1032159	2541620	2542071	278117	278548	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC26H5.03	rqh1	pcf2	hus2|rad12|rec9	cac2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Pietrobon V (2014)	25313826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	pcf2 partially rescues an rqh1 srs2 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
1032160	2543577	2542071	279992	278548	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC26H5.03	srs2	pcf2	-	cac2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Pietrobon V (2014)	25313826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	pcf2 partially rescues an rqh1 srs2 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
1032161	2541620	2543580	278117	279995	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC644.14c	rqh1	rad51	hus2|rad12|rec9	rhp51	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Pietrobon V (2014)	25313826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	rad51 partially rescues an rqh1 srs2 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
1032162	2543577	2543580	279992	279995	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC644.14c	srs2	rad51	-	rhp51	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Pietrobon V (2014)	25313826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	rad51 partially rescues an rqh1 srs2 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
1032163	2539705	2538709	276258	275293	SPBC1105.10	SPCC663.03	rav1	pmd1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tay Z (2013)	24059229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 1|Figure 4|Figure 5|genetic complex|rav1 pmd1 cor1 triple mutant has increased doxorubicin sensitivity|rav1 pmd1 cor1 triple mutant has increased epirubicin sensitivity|rav1 pmd1 double mutant displays synthetic growth defect|rav1 pmd1 double mutant has increased sensitivity to doxorubicin|rav1 pmd1 double mutant has increased sensitivity to epirubicin	-	BIOGRID
1032164	2539705	2538709	276258	275293	SPBC1105.10	SPCC663.03	rav1	pmd1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tay Z (2013)	24059229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chemical compound accumulation	Figure 2|rav1 pmd1 double mutant shows increased accumulation of doxorubicin	-	BIOGRID
1032165	2539705	2542639	276258	279093	SPBC1105.10	SPAC2C4.05	rav1	cor1	-	SPAC2C4.05	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tay Z (2013)	24059229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Figure 4|Figure 5|cor1 deletion rescues doxorubicin sensitivity of rav1 mutant|cor1 deletion rescues epirubicin sensitivity of rav1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1032166	2538709	2542639	275293	279093	SPCC663.03	SPAC2C4.05	pmd1	cor1	-	SPAC2C4.05	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tay Z (2013)	24059229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 4|Figure 5|genetic complex|pmd1 cor1 double mutant has increased doxorubicin sensitivity|pmd1 cor1 double mutant has increased sensitivity to epirubicin|rav1 pmd1 cor1 triple mutant has increased doxorubicin sensitivity|rav1 pmd1 cor1 triple mutant has increased epirubicin sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
1032167	2539705	2542639	276258	279093	SPBC1105.10	SPAC2C4.05	rav1	cor1	-	SPAC2C4.05	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tay Z (2013)	24059229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 4|Figure 5|genetic complex|rav1 pmd1 cor1 triple mutant has increased doxorubicin sensitivity|rav1 pmd1 cor1 triple mutant has increased epirubicin sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
1032624	2543682	2540481	280096	277009	SPAC637.10c	SPBC2D10.12	rpn10	rhp23	pus1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Paraskevopoulos K (2014)	25306921	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
1032626	2543058	2540481	279492	277009	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC2D10.12	rpn15	rhp23	dss1|sem1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Paraskevopoulos K (2014)	25306921	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	DSS1 expression rescued rhp23 rpn10 double mutant|DSS1 expression rescued rhp23 rpn10 dph1 triple mutant|DSS1 expression rescued rhp23 rpn10 rpn13a rpn13b quadruple mutant	-	BIOGRID
1032627	2543058	2543682	279492	280096	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC637.10c	rpn15	rpn10	dss1|sem1	pus1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Paraskevopoulos K (2014)	25306921	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	DSS1 expression rescued rhp23 rpn10 double mutant|DSS1 expression rescued rhp23 rpn10 dph1 triple mutant|DSS1 expression rescued rhp23 rpn10 rpn13a rpn13b quadruple mutant	-	BIOGRID
1032628	2543058	2542667	279492	279120	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC26A3.16	rpn15	dph1	dss1|sem1	ucp5	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Paraskevopoulos K (2014)	25306921	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	DSS1 expression rescued rhp23 rpn10 dph1 triple mutant	-	BIOGRID
1032629	2543058	2540980	279492	277496	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC342.04	rpn15	rpn1301	dss1|sem1	rpn13|rpn13a	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Paraskevopoulos K (2014)	25306921	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	DSS1 expression rescued rhp23 rpn10 rpn13a rpn13b quadruple mutant	-	BIOGRID
1032630	2543058	2539182	279492	275753	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC16A11.16c	rpn15	rpn1302	dss1|sem1	rpn13|rpn13b	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Paraskevopoulos K (2014)	25306921	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	DSS1 expression rescued rhp23 rpn10 rpn13a rpn13b quadruple mutant	-	BIOGRID
1032631	2543058	2541030	279492	277545	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC337.08c	rpn15	ubi4	dss1|sem1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Paraskevopoulos K (2014)	25306921	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1032632	2540481	2541030	277009	277545	SPBC2D10.12	SPBC337.08c	rhp23	ubi4	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Paraskevopoulos K (2014)	25306921	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1032633	2543058	2541268	279492	277782	SPAC3G6.02	SPBP19A11.03c	rpn15	mts4	dss1|sem1	rpn1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Paraskevopoulos K (2014)	25306921	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1033016	851337	2540887	31855	277404	YDL190C	SPBC4F6.15c	UFD2	swi10	ubiquitin-ubiquitin ligase UFD2|L000002788	rad23	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Haenzelmann P (2010)	20427284	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1033017	851337	2542667	31855	279120	YDL190C	SPAC26A3.16	UFD2	dph1	ubiquitin-ubiquitin ligase UFD2|L000002788	ucp5	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Haenzelmann P (2010)	20427284	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1033018	2542023	2540887	278506	277404	SPAC20H4.10	SPBC4F6.15c	ufd2	swi10	SPAC145.04	rad23	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Haenzelmann P (2010)	20427284	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1033019	2542023	2542667	278506	279120	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC26A3.16	ufd2	dph1	SPAC145.04	ucp5	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Haenzelmann P (2010)	20427284	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1033020	2542023	855319	278506	35455	SPAC20H4.10	YMR276W	ufd2	DSK2	SPAC145.04	L000002646	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Haenzelmann P (2010)	20427284	284812	559292	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1033021	2542023	856674	278506	36692	SPAC20H4.10	YEL037C	ufd2	RAD23	SPAC145.04	L000001568	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Haenzelmann P (2010)	20427284	284812	559292	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1033582	2543407	2540255	279829	276786	SPAC8F11.07c	SPBC336.04	cdc24	cdc6	-	mis10|pol3|pold	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tanaka H (2004)	15576681	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
1033583	2543407	2539479	279829	276042	SPAC8F11.07c	SPCC584.04	cdc24	sup35	-	erf3	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tanaka H (2004)	15576681	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
1033584	2543407	2541213	279829	277727	SPAC8F11.07c	SPBC887.14c	cdc24	pfh1	-	pif1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tanaka H (2004)	15576681	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
1033585	2543407	2542148	279829	278624	SPAC8F11.07c	SPAC1834.01	cdc24	sup45	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tanaka H (2004)	15576681	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
1033586	2540148	2540255	276685	276786	SPBC16D10.04c	SPBC336.04	dna2	cdc6	-	mis10|pol3|pold	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tanaka H (2004)	15576681	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
1033587	2540148	2539627	276685	276184	SPBC16D10.04c	SPBC1734.02c	dna2	cdc27	-	SPBC337.18c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tanaka H (2004)	15576681	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
1033592	2539773	2540329	276324	276859	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC29B5.01	med7	atf1	-	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Co-localization	physical	Kato H (2013)	24224056	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1033593	2539773	2542047	276324	278528	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC21E11.03c	med7	pcr1	-	mts2	Co-localization	physical	Kato H (2013)	24224056	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1033904	2539408	2543668	275973	280082	SPCC576.12c	SPAC9.05	mhf2	fml1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yan Z (2010)	20347428	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	increased deletion-type gene conversion observed in mhf2 mutant is suppressed by mutation of fml1	-	BIOGRID
1034198	854485	2540389	34697	276917	YOR308C	SPBC31E1.03	SNU66	hub1	-	ubl4	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Mishra SK (2011)	21614000	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1034270	2542824	2539641	279271	276196	SPAC144.13c	SPBC14C8.01c	srw1	cut2	ste9	SPBC1815.02c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kimata Y (2011)	21389117	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	ubiquitinates substrate as part of the APC in vitro	-	BIOGRID
1034271	2542824	2540880	279271	277397	SPAC144.13c	SPBC582.03	srw1	cdc13	ste9	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kimata Y (2011)	21389117	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	ubiquitinates substrate as part of the APC in vitro	-	BIOGRID
1034272	2540043	2539641	276581	276196	SPBC1198.12	SPBC14C8.01c	mfr1	cut2	SPBC660.02|fzr1	SPBC1815.02c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kimata Y (2011)	21389117	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	ubiquitinates substrate as part of the APC in vitro	-	BIOGRID
1034273	2540043	2540880	276581	277397	SPBC1198.12	SPBC582.03	mfr1	cdc13	SPBC660.02|fzr1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kimata Y (2011)	21389117	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	ubiquitinates substrate as part of the APC in vitro	-	BIOGRID
1034275	2543222	2539641	279650	276196	SPAC821.08c	SPBC14C8.01c	slp1	cut2	cdc20	SPBC1815.02c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kimata Y (2011)	21389117	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	ubiquitinates substrate as part of the APC in vitro	-	BIOGRID
1034276	2543222	2540880	279650	277397	SPAC821.08c	SPBC582.03	slp1	cdc13	cdc20	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kimata Y (2011)	21389117	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	ubiquitinates substrate as part of the APC in vitro	-	BIOGRID
1034277	2542840	2539641	279286	276196	SPAC13G6.08	SPBC14C8.01c	SPAC13G6.08	cut2	-	SPBC1815.02c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kimata Y (2011)	21389117	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	ubiquitinates substrate as part of the APC in vitro	-	BIOGRID
1034278	2542840	2540880	279286	277397	SPAC13G6.08	SPBC582.03	SPAC13G6.08	cdc13	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kimata Y (2011)	21389117	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	ubiquitinates substrate as part of the APC in vitro	-	BIOGRID
1034279	2543222	2541861	279650	278351	SPAC821.08c	SPAC5D6.08c	slp1	mes1	cdc20	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kimata Y (2011)	21389117	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	ubiquitinates substrate as part of the APC in vitro	-	BIOGRID
1034280	2542824	2541861	279271	278351	SPAC144.13c	SPAC5D6.08c	srw1	mes1	ste9	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kimata Y (2011)	21389117	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	ubiquitinates substrate as part of the APC in vitro	-	BIOGRID
1034281	2542840	2541861	279286	278351	SPAC13G6.08	SPAC5D6.08c	SPAC13G6.08	mes1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kimata Y (2011)	21389117	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	ubiquitinates substrate as part of the APC in vitro	-	BIOGRID
1034282	2543187	2540277	279616	276808	SPAC343.03	SPBC2D10.20	apc11	ubc1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kimata Y (2011)	21389117	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	E2: Ubc1, Ubc4 or Ubc11	-	BIOGRID
1034283	2543187	2540083	279616	276621	SPAC343.03	SPBC119.02	apc11	ubc4	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kimata Y (2011)	21389117	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	E2: Ubc1, Ubc4 or Ubc11	-	BIOGRID
1034284	2543187	2539190	279616	275761	SPAC343.03	SPCC1259.15c	apc11	ubc11	-	ubcdp|ubcp4	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kimata Y (2011)	21389117	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	E2: Ubc1, Ubc4 or Ubc11	-	BIOGRID
1035705	850620	2541947	31215	278434	YLL039C	SPAC2G11.05c	UBI4	rim20	SCD2|UB14|ubiquitin|L000002414	SPAC2G11.05c	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Pashkova N (2013)	23726974	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	#LPPI|Likely protein-protein interaction|NOT a covalent complex	-	BIOGRID
1035781	2539352	2540601	275918	277127	SPCC188.07	SPBC29A3.14c	ccq1	trt1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Jun HI (2013)	24013504	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1050534	2539087	2540234	275659	276766	SPCC1259.13	SPBC336.12c	chk1	cdc10	rad27	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Ivanova T (2013)	24006488	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1050572	854025	2539814	34277	276364	YOL140W	SPBC1105.18c	ARG8	pth3	acetylornithine transaminase|L000000111	SPBC1105.18c|SPBC887.21c	Co-fractionation	physical	Dujeancourt L (2013)	23892058	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	mitochondrial expression	-	BIOGRID
1050573	854025	2541472	34277	277974	YOL140W	SPAC589.11	ARG8	pth4	acetylornithine transaminase|L000000111	mug82	Co-fractionation	physical	Dujeancourt L (2013)	23892058	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	mitochondrial expression	-	BIOGRID
1050574	854025	2541478	34277	277980	YOL140W	SPAC2F7.17	ARG8	mrf1	acetylornithine transaminase|L000000111	SPAC2F7.17	Co-fractionation	physical	Dujeancourt L (2013)	23892058	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	mitochondrial expression	-	BIOGRID
1056977	3361420	2540352	280496	276881	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPBC215.03c	csn2	csn1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lyapina S (2001)	11337588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1056978	3361420	2542393	280496	278857	SPAPB17E12.04c	SPAC17G6.12	csn2	cul1	-	pcu1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lyapina S (2001)	11337588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1056979	2542393	2540917	278857	277433	SPAC17G6.12	SPBC409.05	cul1	skp1	pcu1	psh1|sph1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lyapina S (2001)	11337588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1056980	2542393	2541897	278857	278387	SPAC17G6.12	SPAC23H4.18c	cul1	rbx1	pcu1	pip1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lyapina S (2001)	11337588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1056981	2542393	2541030	278857	277545	SPAC17G6.12	SPBC337.08c	cul1	ubi4	pcu1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Lyapina S (2001)	11337588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1056982	2542393	2542393	278857	278857	SPAC17G6.12	SPAC17G6.12	cul1	cul1	pcu1	pcu1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lyapina S (2001)	11337588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	auto-ubiquitination	-	BIOGRID
1056983	2542393	997	278857	107432	SPAC17G6.12	-	cul1	CDC34	pcu1	E2-CDC34|UBC3|UBCH3|UBE2R1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Lyapina S (2001)	11337588	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	-	-	E2: Cdc34	-	BIOGRID
1056984	10987	2542393	116183	278857	-	SPAC17G6.12	COPS5	cul1	CSN5|JAB1|MOV-34|SGN5	pcu1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lyapina S (2001)	11337588	9606	284812	Low Throughput	-	Deneddylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1059404	2543483	2542807	279903	279255	SPAPB2B4.02	SPAC15E1.09	grx5	grx2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kim KD (2010)	20085751	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chemical compound accumulation|vegetative growth	double mutants show aberrant levels of iron accumulation	-	BIOGRID
1059405	2543483	2539409	279903	275974	SPAPB2B4.02	SPCC645.03c	grx5	isa1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kim KD (2010)	20085751	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	growth in exponential phase:wild type|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
1059406	2543483	2539671	279903	276226	SPAPB2B4.02	SPBC1734.11	grx5	mas5	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kim KD (2010)	20085751	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	growth in exponential phase:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
1059407	2543483	2540199	279903	276732	SPAPB2B4.02	SPBC1709.05	grx5	sks2	-	hsc1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kim KD (2010)	20085751	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	growth in exponential phase:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
1059408	2543483	2540984	279903	277500	SPAPB2B4.02	SPBC3B9.17	grx5	isa2	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kim KD (2010)	20085751	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
1059409	2543483	2539409	279903	275974	SPAPB2B4.02	SPCC645.03c	grx5	isa1	-	-	PCA	physical	Kim KD (2010)	20085751	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	BiFC	-	BIOGRID
1059410	2543483	2540984	279903	277500	SPAPB2B4.02	SPBC3B9.17	grx5	isa2	-	-	PCA	physical	Kim KD (2010)	20085751	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	BiFC	-	BIOGRID
1059411	2543483	2542807	279903	279255	SPAPB2B4.02	SPAC15E1.09	grx5	grx2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kim KD (2010)	20085751	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chemical compound accumulation	double mutants show aberrant levels of iron accumulation	-	BIOGRID
1059412	2543483	2539409	279903	275974	SPAPB2B4.02	SPCC645.03c	grx5	isa1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kim KD (2010)	20085751	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chemical compound accumulation:partial rescue	Isa1 overproduction restored the level of aconitase, sulfite reductase, and succinate dehydrogenase significantly, approaching more than 70% of the level grx5 complemented	-	BIOGRID
1059615	2539423	2540627	275988	277153	SPCC663.12	SPBC25H2.13c	cid12	cdc20	-	pol2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Win TZ (2006)	16738311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
1059716	2542757	2542757	279207	279207	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC13C5.07	mre11	mre11	rad32	rad32	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Limbo O (2012)	23080121	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	homodimer|source of Mre11 is Pyrococcus furiosus	-	BIOGRID
1059846	850620	2540027	31215	276571	YLL039C	SPBC1734.14c	UBI4	suc1	SCD2|UB14|ubiquitin|L000002414	p13	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Tempe D (2007)	17198374	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	#LPPI|Likely protein-protein interaction	-	BIOGRID
1060317	852611	2540880	33000	277397	YGL240W	SPBC582.03	DOC1	cdc13	APC10|anaphase promoting complex subunit DOC1|L000004350	-	Protein-peptide	physical	da Fonseca PC (2011)	21107322	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 4|NMR	-	BIOGRID
1100547	2540718	2541929	277241	278417	SPBC3H7.15	SPAC23C4.12	hhp1	hhp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Johnson AE (2013)	24055157	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 3D	-	BIOGRID
1100548	2540718	2539149	277241	275721	SPBC3H7.15	SPCC1739.11c	hhp1	cdc11	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Johnson AE (2013)	24055157	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 3D	-	BIOGRID
1100549	2540718	2541455	277241	277958	SPBC3H7.15	SPAC6G9.06c	hhp1	pcp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Johnson AE (2013)	24055157	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 3D	-	BIOGRID
1100550	2540718	2543554	277241	279971	SPBC3H7.15	SPAC4H3.11c	hhp1	ppc89	-	mug127	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Johnson AE (2013)	24055157	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 3D	-	BIOGRID
1100551	2540718	2540650	277241	277175	SPBC3H7.15	SPBC244.01c	hhp1	sid4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Johnson AE (2013)	24055157	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 3D	-	BIOGRID
1100552	2540718	2541599	277241	278096	SPBC3H7.15	SPAC24B11.11c	hhp1	sid2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Johnson AE (2013)	24055157	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 3D	-	BIOGRID
1100553	2540718	2541936	277241	278423	SPBC3H7.15	SPAC222.10c	hhp1	byr4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Johnson AE (2013)	24055157	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 3D	-	BIOGRID
1100554	2540718	2540223	277241	276756	SPBC3H7.15	SPBC32F12.04	hhp1	gtb1	-	tug1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Johnson AE (2013)	24055157	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 3D	-	BIOGRID
1100555	2540718	2540660	277241	277185	SPBC3H7.15	SPBC21.06c	hhp1	cdc7	-	its10|pld1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Johnson AE (2013)	24055157	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 3D	-	BIOGRID
1100556	2540718	2539467	277241	276030	SPBC3H7.15	SPCC417.07c	hhp1	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Johnson AE (2013)	24055157	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 3D	-	BIOGRID
1100557	2540718	2541141	277241	277656	SPBC3H7.15	SPBC649.05	hhp1	cut12	-	stf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Johnson AE (2013)	24055157	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 3D	-	BIOGRID
1100558	2540718	2539261	277241	275831	SPBC3H7.15	SPCC1682.04	hhp1	cdc31	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Johnson AE (2013)	24055157	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 3D	-	BIOGRID
1100559	2541929	2540718	278417	277241	SPAC23C4.12	SPBC3H7.15	hhp2	hhp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Johnson AE (2013)	24055157	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 3D	-	BIOGRID
1100560	2541929	2541929	278417	278417	SPAC23C4.12	SPAC23C4.12	hhp2	hhp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Johnson AE (2013)	24055157	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 3D	-	BIOGRID
1100561	2541929	2541455	278417	277958	SPAC23C4.12	SPAC6G9.06c	hhp2	pcp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Johnson AE (2013)	24055157	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 3D	-	BIOGRID
1100562	2541929	2543554	278417	279971	SPAC23C4.12	SPAC4H3.11c	hhp2	ppc89	-	mug127	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Johnson AE (2013)	24055157	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 3D	-	BIOGRID
1100563	2541929	2541599	278417	278096	SPAC23C4.12	SPAC24B11.11c	hhp2	sid2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Johnson AE (2013)	24055157	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 3D	-	BIOGRID
1100564	2541929	2540223	278417	276756	SPAC23C4.12	SPBC32F12.04	hhp2	gtb1	-	tug1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Johnson AE (2013)	24055157	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 3D	-	BIOGRID
1100565	2541929	2539467	278417	276030	SPAC23C4.12	SPCC417.07c	hhp2	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Johnson AE (2013)	24055157	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 3D	-	BIOGRID
1103373	2543027	2539997	279463	276541	SPAC110.03	SPBC1604.14c	cdc42	shk1	-	orb2|pak1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Marcus S (1995)	7597098	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
1103374	2543339	2540833	279762	277351	SPAC630.13c	SPBC18H10.20c	tsc2	any1	-	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nakashima A (2014)	24876389	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	amino acid update defect suppressed	-	BIOGRID
1103375	2543339	2540833	279762	277351	SPAC630.13c	SPBC18H10.20c	tsc2	any1	-	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakashima A (2014)	24876389	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution:undetermined|resistance to chemicals:undetermined	Deletion of arn1 suppressed the mislocalization of Cat1-GFP in a tsc2delta background|deletion of arn1 suppressed the resistance to canavanine seen in a tsc2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1103376	2542757	3361306	279207	280382	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC6B1.09c	mre11	nbs1	rad32	slr10	Two-hybrid	physical	Ueno M (2003)	12944481	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103430	2539781	2542861	276331	279307	SPBC106.10	SPAC13G7.13c	pka1	msa1	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	SPAC6C3.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Jeong HT (2004)	15166138	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:undetermined	multicopy suppressors of sam1 hypersporulation	-	BIOGRID
1103431	2539781	2541755	276331	278249	SPBC106.10	SPAC2F7.11	pka1	nrd1	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	msa2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Jeong HT (2004)	15166138	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:undetermined	multicopy suppressors of sam1 hypersporulation	-	BIOGRID
1103432	2542196	2543086	278671	279519	SPAC30D11.13	SPAC30D11.10	hus5	rad52	ubc9	rad22|rad22A	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ho JC (2003)	12597774	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103459	2540730	2541929	277253	278417	SPBC19C2.09	SPAC23C4.12	sre1	hhp2	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Brookheart RT (2013)	24327658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
1103460	2540730	2543304	277253	279728	SPBC19C2.09	SPAC6B12.12	sre1	tom70	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Brookheart RT (2013)	24327658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
1103461	2540730	2541179	277253	277693	SPBC19C2.09	SPBC6B1.08c	sre1	ofd1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Brookheart RT (2013)	24327658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	sre1N allele; genetic screen for growth on 5-FOA	-	BIOGRID
1103462	2543281	2540992	279708	277508	SPAC23C4.18c	SPBC342.05	rad4	crb2	cut5|dpb11|dre3	rhp9	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Qu M (2013)	24074952	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103791	2541117	2539572	277632	276132	SPBC646.13	SPCC576.03c	sds23	tpx1	moc1|psp1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103792	2541117	2542331	277632	278797	SPBC646.13	SPAC1834.05	sds23	alg9	moc1|psp1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103793	2541117	2539290	277632	275858	SPBC646.13	SPCC188.06c	sds23	srp54	moc1|psp1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103794	2541117	2540910	277632	277426	SPBC646.13	SPBC577.02	sds23	rpl3801	moc1|psp1	rpl38-1	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103795	2541117	2541737	277632	278231	SPBC646.13	SPAC22H12.04c	sds23	rps102	moc1|psp1	rps1-2|rps3a-2	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103796	2541117	2540817	277632	277335	SPBC646.13	SPAC3H5.05c	sds23	rps1401	moc1|psp1	rps14|rps14-1	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103797	2541117	2543559	277632	279975	SPBC646.13	SPAC664.04c	sds23	rps1602	moc1|psp1	rps16|rps16-2	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103798	2541117	2539449	277632	276012	SPBC646.13	SPCC576.09	sds23	rps20	moc1|psp1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103799	2541117	2538816	277632	275397	SPBC646.13	SPCC1442.10c	sds23	rpb3	moc1|psp1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103800	2541117	2543686	277632	280100	SPBC646.13	SPAC3C7.14c	sds23	obr1	moc1|psp1	apt1|uhp1|p25	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103801	2541117	2539144	277632	275716	SPBC646.13	SPCC16A11.14	sds23	sfh1	moc1|psp1	SPNCRNA.125	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103802	2541117	2542023	277632	278506	SPBC646.13	SPAC20H4.10	sds23	ufd2	moc1|psp1	SPAC145.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103803	2541117	2541874	277632	278364	SPBC646.13	SPAC1F8.07c	sds23	SPAC1F8.07c	moc1|psp1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103804	2541117	2539035	277632	275608	SPBC646.13	SPCC794.09c	sds23	tef101	moc1|psp1	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103805	2541117	2540547	277632	277074	SPBC646.13	SPBC32F12.11	sds23	tdh1	moc1|psp1	gpd1	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103806	2541117	2541172	277632	277686	SPBC646.13	SPBC776.01	sds23	rpl29	moc1|psp1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103807	2541117	2543460	277632	279880	SPBC646.13	SPAC3H5.10	sds23	rpl3202	moc1|psp1	rpl32|rpl32-2	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103808	2538689	2543460	275274	279880	SPCC1795.11	SPAC3H5.10	sum3	rpl3202	ded1|moc2|slh3	rpl32|rpl32-2	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103809	2543646	2543460	280060	279880	SPAC821.07c	SPAC3H5.10	moc3	rpl3202	-	rpl32|rpl32-2	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103810	2543646	2541874	280060	278364	SPAC821.07c	SPAC1F8.07c	moc3	SPAC1F8.07c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103811	2543646	2539035	280060	275608	SPAC821.07c	SPCC794.09c	moc3	tef101	-	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103812	2543646	2540547	280060	277074	SPAC821.07c	SPBC32F12.11	moc3	tdh1	-	gpd1	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103813	2543646	2539572	280060	276132	SPAC821.07c	SPCC576.03c	moc3	tpx1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103814	2543646	2542331	280060	278797	SPAC821.07c	SPAC1834.05	moc3	alg9	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103815	2543646	2539290	280060	275858	SPAC821.07c	SPCC188.06c	moc3	srp54	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103816	2543646	2541172	280060	277686	SPAC821.07c	SPBC776.01	moc3	rpl29	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103817	2543646	2540910	280060	277426	SPAC821.07c	SPBC577.02	moc3	rpl3801	-	rpl38-1	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103818	2543646	2541737	280060	278231	SPAC821.07c	SPAC22H12.04c	moc3	rps102	-	rps1-2|rps3a-2	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103819	2543646	2540817	280060	277335	SPAC821.07c	SPAC3H5.05c	moc3	rps1401	-	rps14|rps14-1	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103820	2543646	2543559	280060	279975	SPAC821.07c	SPAC664.04c	moc3	rps1602	-	rps16|rps16-2	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103821	2543646	2539449	280060	276012	SPAC821.07c	SPCC576.09	moc3	rps20	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103822	2543646	2538816	280060	275397	SPAC821.07c	SPCC1442.10c	moc3	rpb3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103823	2543646	2543686	280060	280100	SPAC821.07c	SPAC3C7.14c	moc3	obr1	-	apt1|uhp1|p25	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103824	2543646	2539144	280060	275716	SPAC821.07c	SPCC16A11.14	moc3	sfh1	-	SPNCRNA.125	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103825	2543646	2542023	280060	278506	SPAC821.07c	SPAC20H4.10	moc3	ufd2	-	SPAC145.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103826	2539958	2543460	276502	279880	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC3H5.10	zfs1	rpl3202	moc4	rpl32|rpl32-2	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103827	2539958	2542023	276502	278506	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC20H4.10	zfs1	ufd2	moc4	SPAC145.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103828	2539958	2541874	276502	278364	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC1F8.07c	zfs1	SPAC1F8.07c	moc4	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103829	2539958	2539035	276502	275608	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC794.09c	zfs1	tef101	moc4	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103830	2539958	2540547	276502	277074	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC32F12.11	zfs1	tdh1	moc4	gpd1	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103831	2539958	2539572	276502	276132	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC576.03c	zfs1	tpx1	moc4	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103832	2539958	2539290	276502	275858	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC188.06c	zfs1	srp54	moc4	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103833	2538689	2540517	275274	277045	SPCC1795.11	SPBC29A3.04	sum3	rpl8	ded1|moc2|slh3	rpl701|rpl7a	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103834	2538689	2539678	275274	276233	SPCC1795.11	SPBC11C11.07	sum3	rpl1801	ded1|moc2|slh3	rpl18|rpl18-1	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103835	2538689	2542725	275274	279176	SPCC1795.11	SPAC3A12.10	sum3	rpl2001	ded1|moc2|slh3	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103836	2538689	2539336	275274	275902	SPCC1795.11	SPCC74.05	sum3	rpl2702	ded1|moc2|slh3	rpl27-2	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103837	2538689	2541172	275274	277686	SPCC1795.11	SPBC776.01	sum3	rpl29	ded1|moc2|slh3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103838	2538689	2542108	275274	278584	SPCC1795.11	SPAC6F6.07c	sum3	rps13	ded1|moc2|slh3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103839	2538689	2541500	275274	278002	SPCC1795.11	SPAC227.18	sum3	lys3	ded1|moc2|slh3	SPAC2F7.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103840	2543646	2540517	280060	277045	SPAC821.07c	SPBC29A3.04	moc3	rpl8	-	rpl701|rpl7a	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103841	2543646	2539678	280060	276233	SPAC821.07c	SPBC11C11.07	moc3	rpl1801	-	rpl18|rpl18-1	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103842	2543646	2542725	280060	279176	SPAC821.07c	SPAC3A12.10	moc3	rpl2001	-	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103843	2543646	2539336	280060	275902	SPAC821.07c	SPCC74.05	moc3	rpl2702	-	rpl27-2	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103844	2543646	2542108	280060	278584	SPAC821.07c	SPAC6F6.07c	moc3	rps13	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103845	2543646	2541500	280060	278002	SPAC821.07c	SPAC227.18	moc3	lys3	-	SPAC2F7.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103846	2543646	2539782	280060	276332	SPAC821.07c	SPBC1815.01	moc3	eno101	-	eno1	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103847	2543646	2543205	280060	279634	SPAC821.07c	SPAC323.02c	moc3	pup2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103848	2543646	2542128	280060	278604	SPAC821.07c	SPAC821.10c	moc3	sod1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103849	2543646	2543394	280060	279816	SPAC821.07c	SPAPB1A10.11c	moc3	mse1	-	ers2	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103850	2543646	2543298	280060	279723	SPAC821.07c	SPAC6B12.15	moc3	cpc2	-	rkp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103851	2541117	2539782	277632	276332	SPBC646.13	SPBC1815.01	sds23	eno101	moc1|psp1	eno1	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103852	2541117	2543205	277632	279634	SPBC646.13	SPAC323.02c	sds23	pup2	moc1|psp1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103853	2541117	2542128	277632	278604	SPBC646.13	SPAC821.10c	sds23	sod1	moc1|psp1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103854	2541117	2543394	277632	279816	SPBC646.13	SPAPB1A10.11c	sds23	mse1	moc1|psp1	ers2	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103855	2541117	2543298	277632	279723	SPBC646.13	SPAC6B12.15	sds23	cpc2	moc1|psp1	rkp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103856	2539958	2539782	276502	276332	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC1815.01	zfs1	eno101	moc4	eno1	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103857	2539958	2543205	276502	279634	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC323.02c	zfs1	pup2	moc4	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103858	2539958	2543394	276502	279816	SPBC1718.07c	SPAPB1A10.11c	zfs1	mse1	moc4	ers2	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103859	2538689	2543298	275274	279723	SPCC1795.11	SPAC6B12.15	sum3	cpc2	ded1|moc2|slh3	rkp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103860	2539958	2543642	276502	280056	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC3H5.12c	zfs1	rpl501	moc4	rpl5|rpl5-1	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103861	2539958	2539186	276502	275757	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC16C4.13c	zfs1	rpl1201	moc4	rpl12-1|rpl12.1	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103862	2539958	2540587	276502	277113	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC23G7.15c	zfs1	rpp202	moc4	rpp2-2|rpa4	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103863	2539958	3361483	276502	280559	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC513.01c	zfs1	eft201	moc4	SPAPYUK71.04c|eft2-1|etf2|eft2	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103864	2539958	2542121	276502	278597	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC17H9.05	zfs1	ebp2	moc4	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103865	2539958	2543265	276502	279693	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC1002.13c	zfs1	psu1	moc4	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103866	2539958	2540767	276502	277287	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC19C2.07	zfs1	fba1	moc4	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103867	2539958	2542844	276502	279290	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC13G7.08c	zfs1	crb3	moc4	ipi3	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103868	2539958	2539414	276502	275979	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC74.02c	zfs1	ppn1	moc4	SPCC74.02c	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103869	2543646	2539186	280060	275757	SPAC821.07c	SPCC16C4.13c	moc3	rpl1201	-	rpl12-1|rpl12.1	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103870	2543646	2543265	280060	279693	SPAC821.07c	SPAC1002.13c	moc3	psu1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103871	2543646	2540767	280060	277287	SPAC821.07c	SPBC19C2.07	moc3	fba1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103872	2543646	2542844	280060	279290	SPAC821.07c	SPAC13G7.08c	moc3	crb3	-	ipi3	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103873	2543646	2542121	280060	278597	SPAC821.07c	SPAC17H9.05	moc3	ebp2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103874	2543646	2539414	280060	275979	SPAC821.07c	SPCC74.02c	moc3	ppn1	-	SPCC74.02c	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103875	2541117	2539186	277632	275757	SPBC646.13	SPCC16C4.13c	sds23	rpl1201	moc1|psp1	rpl12-1|rpl12.1	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103876	2541117	2543265	277632	279693	SPBC646.13	SPAC1002.13c	sds23	psu1	moc1|psp1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103877	2541117	2540767	277632	277287	SPBC646.13	SPBC19C2.07	sds23	fba1	moc1|psp1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103878	2541117	2542844	277632	279290	SPBC646.13	SPAC13G7.08c	sds23	crb3	moc1|psp1	ipi3	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103879	2541117	2539414	277632	275979	SPBC646.13	SPCC74.02c	sds23	ppn1	moc1|psp1	SPCC74.02c	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103880	2541117	2540587	277632	277113	SPBC646.13	SPBC23G7.15c	sds23	rpp202	moc1|psp1	rpp2-2|rpa4	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1103881	2539671	2541888	276226	278378	SPBC1734.11	SPAC2E12.02	mas5	hsf1	-	hsf|hstf	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Vjestica A (2013)	24146635	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	budding pattern:partial rescue	downregulation of hsf1 partially rescued the intermittent growth phenotype and bipolar of a mas5 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1103882	2539671	2543027	276226	279463	SPBC1734.11	SPAC110.03	mas5	cdc42	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Vjestica A (2013)	24146635	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	budding pattern:partial rescue	Constitutively active Cdc42-G12V or overexpressed Cdc42 partially rescue the intermittent growth phenotype of a mas5 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1104424	2541599	2542123	278096	278599	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC18G6.15	sid2	mal3	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mana-Capelli S (2012)	23087209	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis|nuclear position	deletion of mal3 prevents nuclear clustering after cytokinesis failure in a sid2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1104425	2540744	2540083	277267	276621	SPBC1604.21c	SPBC119.02	ptr3	ubc4	SPBC211.09|uba1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Olsen SK (2013)	23416107	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	Uba1 transfers a thiolester linked ubiquitin to Ubc4|ubiquitin transthiolation	-	BIOGRID
1104441	2540258	2542474	276789	278934	SPBC32C12.02	SPAC31G5.09c	ste11	spk1	aff1|stex	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kjaerulff S (2005)	15713656	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1104516	2540580	2542404	277106	278868	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC57A7.11	ran1	mip1	pat1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Shinozaki-Yabana S (2000)	10648609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
1104517	2542080	2542404	278557	278868	SPAC27D7.03c	SPAC57A7.11	mei2	mip1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Shinozaki-Yabana S (2000)	10648609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
1104851	851019	2539781	31575	276331	YLR310C	SPBC106.10	CDC25	pka1	CTN1|Ras family guanine nucleotide exchange factor CDC25|CDC25|L000000264|L000000263	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Maeda T (1994)	8144551	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	Figure 5|pka1 expression rescues temperature-sensitivity of cdc25 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1116014	2540744	2540083	277267	276621	SPBC1604.21c	SPBC119.02	ptr3	ubc4	SPBC211.09|uba1	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Olsen SK (2013)	23416107	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1116015	2540744	2542925	277267	279366	SPBC1604.21c	SPAC11E3.04c	ptr3	ubc13	SPBC211.09|uba1	spu13|sst5	Biochemical Activity	physical	Olsen SK (2013)	23416107	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	Uba1 transfers a thiolester linked ubiquitin to E2s|ubiquitin transthiolation	-	BIOGRID
1116016	2540744	2541565	277267	278063	SPBC1604.21c	SPAC1250.03	ptr3	ubc14	SPBC211.09|uba1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Olsen SK (2013)	23416107	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	Uba1 transfers a thiolester linked ubiquitin to E2s|ubiquitin transthiolation	-	BIOGRID
1116017	2540744	2540277	277267	276808	SPBC1604.21c	SPBC2D10.20	ptr3	ubc1	SPBC211.09|uba1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Olsen SK (2013)	23416107	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	Uba1 transfers a thiolester linked ubiquitin to E2s|ubiquitin transthiolation	-	BIOGRID
1116018	2540744	2542622	277267	279076	SPBC1604.21c	SPAC18B11.07c	ptr3	rhp6	SPBC211.09|uba1	sng1|ubc2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Olsen SK (2013)	23416107	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	Uba1 transfers a thiolester linked ubiquitin to E2s|ubiquitin transthiolation	-	BIOGRID
1116019	2540744	2539190	277267	275761	SPBC1604.21c	SPCC1259.15c	ptr3	ubc11	SPBC211.09|uba1	ubcdp|ubcp4	Biochemical Activity	physical	Olsen SK (2013)	23416107	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	Uba1 transfers a thiolester linked ubiquitin to E2s|ubiquitin transthiolation	-	BIOGRID
1116020	2540744	2540738	277267	277261	SPBC1604.21c	SPBC211.07c	ptr3	ubc8	SPBC211.09|uba1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Olsen SK (2013)	23416107	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	Uba1 transfers a thiolester linked ubiquitin to E2s|ubiquitin transthiolation	-	BIOGRID
1173415	2539143	2539644	275715	276199	SPCC1183.03c	SPBC16E9.01c	fxn1	php4	SPCC1183.03c|pfh1	SPBP16F5.09c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Gabrielli N (2012)	23115244	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	the sensitivity to grow under aerobic conditions was partially suppressed in the double mutant	-	BIOGRID
1257318	2543625	3361452	280039	280528	SPAC4F10.03c	SPATRNAPHE.01	SPAC4F10.03c	SPATRNAPHE.01	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Guy MP (2015)	25404562	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	Figure 3|Overexpression of tRNA(Phe) suppresses growth defect of trm7 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1257319	2539918	3361452	276462	280528	SPBC1306.02	SPATRNAPHE.01	rtt10	SPATRNAPHE.01	SPBC1306.02|SPBC4.08	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Guy MP (2015)	25404562	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	Figure 3|Overexpression of tRNA(Phe) suppresses growth defect of trm734 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1257414	667	2542123	107135	278599	RP3-361I14.2	SPAC18G6.15	DST	mal3	BP240|BPA|BPAG1|CATX-15|CATX15|D6S1101|DMH|DT|EBSB2|HSAN6|MACF2	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Buey RM (2012)	22696216	9606	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1276761	2540027	852457	276571	32859	SPBC1734.14c	YBR160W	suc1	CDC28	p13	CDK1|HSL5|SRM5|cyclin-dependent serine/threonine-protein kinase CDC28|L000000267	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Yahya G (2014)	24374311	284812	559292	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S4	-	BIOGRID
1276762	2540027	853966	276571	34222	SPBC1734.14c	YKR091W	suc1	SRL3	p13	WHI7|DNA-binding protein SRL3|L000004671	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Yahya G (2014)	24374311	284812	559292	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure S4	-	BIOGRID
1277046	2540620	852665	277146	33049	SPBC4.04c	YGL207W	mcm2	SPT16	cdc19|nda1	CDC68|SSF1|chromatin-remodeling protein SPT16|L000002038	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Foltman M (2013)	23499444	284812	559292	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 4|in S. cerevisiae cells	-	BIOGRID
1277047	2540620	854933	277146	35097	SPBC4.04c	YML069W	mcm2	POB3	cdc19|nda1	FACT complex subunit POB3|L000003326	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Foltman M (2013)	23499444	284812	559292	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 4|in S. cerevisiae cells	-	BIOGRID
1277048	2540620	851810	277146	32276	SPBC4.04c	YDR224C	mcm2	HTB1	cdc19|nda1	SPT12|histone H2B|L000000829	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Foltman M (2013)	23499444	284812	559292	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 4|in S. cerevisiae cells	-	BIOGRID
1277049	2540620	852284	277146	32700	SPBC4.04c	YBL002W	mcm2	HTB2	cdc19|nda1	histone H2B|L000000830	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Foltman M (2013)	23499444	284812	559292	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 4|in S. cerevisiae cells	-	BIOGRID
1277050	2540620	852295	277146	32711	SPBC4.04c	YBR010W	mcm2	HHT1	cdc19|nda1	BUR5|SIN2|histone H3|L000000772	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Foltman M (2013)	23499444	284812	559292	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 4|in S. cerevisiae cells	-	BIOGRID
1277051	2540620	855700	277146	35796	SPBC4.04c	YNL031C	mcm2	HHT2	cdc19|nda1	histone H3|L000000773	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Foltman M (2013)	23499444	284812	559292	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 4|in S. cerevisiae cells	-	BIOGRID
1278144	2541870	856746	278360	36759	SPAP27G11.03	YER025W	SPAP27G11.03	GCD11	-	SUI4|translation initiation factor eIF2 subunit gamma|L000000677	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Panvert M (2015)	26211610	284812	559292	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1278145	2541870	856746	278360	36759	SPAP27G11.03	YER025W	SPAP27G11.03	GCD11	-	SUI4|translation initiation factor eIF2 subunit gamma|L000000677	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Panvert M (2015)	26211610	284812	559292	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1417057	2541251	2541251	277765	277765	SPBC947.10	SPBC947.10	dsc1	dsc1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Raychaudhuri S (2015)	25918164	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	auto-ubiquitination	-	BIOGRID
1417058	2541251	2540083	277765	276621	SPBC947.10	SPBC119.02	dsc1	ubc4	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Raychaudhuri S (2015)	25918164	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	E2: Ubc4	-	BIOGRID
1417059	2542884	2541251	279329	277765	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC947.10	dsc2	dsc1	ucp14	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Raychaudhuri S (2015)	25918164	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1417060	2542884	2541990	279329	278474	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC20H4.02	dsc2	dsc3	ucp14	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Raychaudhuri S (2015)	25918164	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1417061	2542884	2543396	279329	279818	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC4D7.11	dsc2	dsc4	ucp14	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Raychaudhuri S (2015)	25918164	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1417062	2542884	2539260	279329	275830	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC285.11	dsc2	dsc5	ucp14	ucp10	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Raychaudhuri S (2015)	25918164	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1417369	2541599	2541957	278096	278444	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC23C11.16	sid2	plo1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cullen CF (2000)	10924454	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
1417370	2540660	2541957	277185	278444	SPBC21.06c	SPAC23C11.16	cdc7	plo1	its10|pld1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cullen CF (2000)	10924454	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
1417371	2541635	2542150	278131	278626	SPAC1556.01c	SPAC17A5.11	rad50	rec12	SPAP4C9.01c	spo11	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Young JA (2004)	15238514	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation efficiency:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
1417372	2541635	2540588	278131	277114	SPAC1556.01c	SPBC21B10.12	rad50	rec6	SPAP4C9.01c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Young JA (2004)	15238514	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation efficiency:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
1417373	2542757	2542150	279207	278626	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC17A5.11	mre11	rec12	rad32	spo11	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Young JA (2004)	15238514	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation efficiency:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
1417374	2542757	2540588	279207	277114	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC21B10.12	mre11	rec6	rad32	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Young JA (2004)	15238514	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation efficiency:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
1428793	3361543	2542772	280619	279221	SPAC9.13c	SPAC16.02c	cwf16	srp2	SPAPJ735.01c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sasaki-Haraguchi N (2015)	26302002	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	metabolism and growth:partial rescue	multi-copy suppressors suppress the exon skipping phenotype of an ods4 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1428794	3361543	2539738	280619	276290	SPAC9.13c	SPBC17G9.09	cwf16	tif213	SPAPJ735.01c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sasaki-Haraguchi N (2015)	26302002	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:wild type|metabolism and growth:wild type	multi-copy suppressors suppress the exon skipping phenotype of an ods4 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1428795	2539645	2542772	276200	279221	SPBC146.07	SPAC16.02c	prp2	srp2	mis11|ods1|uaf1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sasaki-Haraguchi N (2015)	26302002	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	metabolism and growth:partial rescue	multi-copy Srp2 suppresses the exon skipping phenotype of ods mutants	-	BIOGRID
1428796	2542482	2542772	278942	279221	SPAP8A3.06	SPAC16.02c	uaf2	srp2	SPAP8A3.06|ods2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sasaki-Haraguchi N (2015)	26302002	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	metabolism and growth:partial rescue	multi-copy Srp2 suppresses the exon skipping phenotype of ods mutants	-	BIOGRID
1428797	2538832	2542772	275413	279221	SPCC962.06c	SPAC16.02c	bpb1	srp2	sf1|ods3	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sasaki-Haraguchi N (2015)	26302002	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	metabolism and growth:partial rescue	multi-copy Srp2 suppresses the exon skipping phenotype of ods mutants	-	BIOGRID
1428990	2542873	2542988	279318	279426	SPAC9G1.02	SPAC1006.09	wis4	win1	wak1|wik1	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hu L (2015)	26108447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	double mutants show increased resistance to clotrimazole (CHEBI:3764) and miconazole (CHEBI:6923)	-	BIOGRID
1428996	2538829	2538829	275410	275410	SPCC306.09c	SPCC306.09c	cap1	cap1	cap	cap	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yamamoto T (2015)	26542710	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1429001	2538829	2540051	275410	276589	SPCC306.09c	SPBC32H8.12c	cap1	act1	cap	cps8|pi012	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yamamoto T (2015)	26542710	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1429002	2540051	2538829	276589	275410	SPBC32H8.12c	SPCC306.09c	act1	cap1	cps8|pi012	cap	Two-hybrid	physical	Yamamoto T (2015)	26542710	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1429007	2538829	2538829	275410	275410	SPCC306.09c	SPCC306.09c	cap1	cap1	cap	cap	Two-hybrid	physical	Yamamoto T (2015)	26542710	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1429011	2538829	2540051	275410	276589	SPCC306.09c	SPBC32H8.12c	cap1	act1	cap	cps8|pi012	Two-hybrid	physical	Yamamoto T (2015)	26542710	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1429012	2538829	2539035	275410	275608	SPCC306.09c	SPCC794.09c	cap1	tef101	cap	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Two-hybrid	physical	Yamamoto T (2015)	26542710	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1429013	2538829	2541738	275410	278232	SPCC306.09c	SPAC20G4.06c	cap1	adf1	cap	cof1	Two-hybrid	physical	Yamamoto T (2015)	26542710	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1429014	2538829	2539680	275410	276235	SPCC306.09c	SPBC11C11.09c	cap1	rpl502	cap	rpl5-2|rpl5b	Two-hybrid	physical	Yamamoto T (2015)	26542710	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1429015	2538829	2539945	275410	276489	SPCC306.09c	SPBC119.05c	cap1	SPBC119.05c	cap	csh3	Two-hybrid	physical	Yamamoto T (2015)	26542710	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1429016	2539945	2538829	276489	275410	SPBC119.05c	SPCC306.09c	SPBC119.05c	cap1	csh3	cap	Two-hybrid	physical	Yamamoto T (2015)	26542710	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1429017	2538829	2539945	275410	276489	SPCC306.09c	SPBC119.05c	cap1	SPBC119.05c	cap	csh3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yamamoto T (2015)	26542710	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1429018	2539945	2539945	276489	276489	SPBC119.05c	SPBC119.05c	SPBC119.05c	SPBC119.05c	csh3	csh3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yamamoto T (2015)	26542710	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1429019	2539945	2539945	276489	276489	SPBC119.05c	SPBC119.05c	SPBC119.05c	SPBC119.05c	csh3	csh3	Two-hybrid	physical	Yamamoto T (2015)	26542710	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1429020	2538829	2539945	275410	276489	SPCC306.09c	SPBC119.05c	cap1	SPBC119.05c	cap	csh3	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Yamamoto T (2015)	26542710	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	when both csh3 and cap1 were over-expressed, we observed growth inhibition	-	BIOGRID
1429021	2538829	2539945	275410	276489	SPCC306.09c	SPBC119.05c	cap1	SPBC119.05c	cap	csh3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yamamoto T (2015)	26542710	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	the csh3/cap1 deletion strain displayed a much severer growth defect on minimal medium than the strains with a single disruption	-	BIOGRID
1429022	2539945	2538829	276489	275410	SPBC119.05c	SPCC306.09c	SPBC119.05c	cap1	csh3	cap	Co-localization	physical	Yamamoto T (2015)	26542710	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1429023	2539659	2542611	276214	279065	SPBC146.13c	SPAC29A4.05	myo1	cam2	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Bi J (2015)	26092123	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1429024	2539847	2542666	276395	279119	SPBC530.14c	SPAC1142.04	dsk1	SPAC1142.04	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429025	2539847	2541440	276395	277945	SPBC530.14c	SPAC1565.05	dsk1	utp8	-	SPAC1565.05	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429026	2539847	2542171	276395	278646	SPBC530.14c	SPAC17G6.11c	dsk1	SPAC17G6.11c	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429027	2539847	3361454	276395	280530	SPBC530.14c	SPAC1D4.14	dsk1	tho2	-	SPAC22F3.14c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429028	2539847	2541998	276395	278482	SPBC530.14c	SPAC23A1.09	dsk1	SPAC23A1.09	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429029	2539847	2542019	276395	278502	SPBC530.14c	SPAC23A1.17	dsk1	SPAC23A1.17	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429030	2539847	3361412	276395	280488	SPBC530.14c	SPAC25G10.01	dsk1	SPAC25G10.01	-	SPAC2C4.18	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429031	2539847	2542498	276395	278957	SPBC530.14c	SPACUNK4.16c	dsk1	SPACUNK4.16c	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429032	2539847	2542249	276395	278719	SPBC530.14c	SPAC30D11.14c	dsk1	SPAC30D11.14c	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429033	2539847	2542509	276395	278967	SPBC530.14c	SPAC3A11.09	dsk1	sod22	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429034	2539847	2543517	276395	279935	SPBC530.14c	SPAC3G9.05	dsk1	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429035	2539847	2542131	276395	278607	SPBC530.14c	SPAC57A7.12	dsk1	SPAC57A7.12	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429036	2539847	2543426	276395	279846	SPBC530.14c	SPAC631.02	dsk1	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429037	2539847	2541639	276395	278135	SPBC530.14c	SPAC6F12.16c	dsk1	mtr4	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429038	2539847	2541457	276395	277960	SPBC530.14c	SPAC6G10.10c	dsk1	SPAC6G10.10c	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429039	2539847	2543179	276395	279609	SPBC530.14c	SPAP8A3.12c	dsk1	tpp2	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429040	2539847	2540175	276395	276708	SPBC530.14c	SPBC106.16	dsk1	pre6	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429041	2539847	2539753	276395	276305	SPBC530.14c	SPBC14F5.06	dsk1	rli1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429042	2539847	2539702	276395	276255	SPBC530.14c	SPBC1604.12	dsk1	SPBC1604.12	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429043	2539847	2539740	276395	276292	SPBC530.14c	SPBC1685.04	dsk1	SPBC1685.04	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429044	2539847	2539743	276395	276295	SPBC530.14c	SPBC16A3.08c	dsk1	oga1	-	SPBC16A3.08c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429045	2539847	2539809	276395	276359	SPBC530.14c	SPBC16E9.02c	dsk1	SPBC16E9.02c	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429046	2539847	2540086	276395	276624	SPBC530.14c	SPBC16H5.12c	dsk1	SPBC16H5.12c	-	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429047	2539847	2540566	276395	277093	SPBC530.14c	SPBC18E5.07	dsk1	SPBC18E5.07	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429048	2539847	2540746	276395	277269	SPBC530.14c	SPBC211.03c	dsk1	gea1	-	SPBC211.03c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429049	2539847	2541057	276395	277572	SPBC530.14c	SPBC365.11	dsk1	SPBC365.11	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429050	2539847	2540681	276395	277206	SPBC530.14c	SPBC3H7.02	dsk1	SPBC3H7.02	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429051	2539847	2541143	276395	277658	SPBC530.14c	SPBC725.08	dsk1	pir2	-	SPBC725.08|ars2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429052	2539847	2541334	276395	277845	SPBC530.14c	SPBP4H10.18c	dsk1	SPBP4H10.18c	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429053	2539847	2539051	276395	275624	SPBC530.14c	SPCC1183.11	dsk1	msy1	-	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429054	2539847	2539078	276395	275650	SPBC530.14c	SPCC1259.04	dsk1	iec3	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429055	2539847	2539216	276395	275786	SPBC530.14c	SPCC14G10.04	dsk1	SPCC14G10.04	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429056	2539847	2539361	276395	275927	SPBC530.14c	SPCC162.01c	dsk1	SPCC162.01c	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429057	2539847	2538993	276395	275567	SPBC530.14c	SPCC162.12	dsk1	tco89	-	SPCC1753.06c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429058	2539847	2539220	276395	275790	SPBC530.14c	SPCC297.05	dsk1	SPCC297.05	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429059	2539847	2538708	276395	275292	SPBC530.14c	SPCC594.01	dsk1	SPCC594.01	-	SPCC736.16	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429060	2539847	2538820	276395	275401	SPBC530.14c	SPCC70.05c	dsk1	nnk1	-	SPCC70.05c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429061	2539847	2539093	276395	275665	SPBC530.14c	SPCC736.15	dsk1	pil1	-	SPCC736.15	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429062	2539847	2539459	276395	276022	SPBC530.14c	SPCC825.05c	dsk1	pwi1	-	SPCC825.05c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429063	2539847	2540105	276395	276642	SPBC530.14c	SPBC106.04	dsk1	ada1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429064	2539847	2539497	276395	276060	SPBC530.14c	SPCC895.07	dsk1	alp14	-	mtc1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429065	2539847	2543355	276395	279777	SPBC530.14c	SPAC959.09c	dsk1	apc5	-	SPAP32A8.01c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429066	2539847	2543372	276395	279794	SPBC530.14c	SPAPB1A10.09	dsk1	ase1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429067	2539847	2538832	276395	275413	SPBC530.14c	SPCC962.06c	dsk1	bpb1	-	sf1|ods3	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429068	2539847	2541975	276395	278460	SPBC530.14c	SPAC20G8.05c	dsk1	cdc15	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429069	2539847	2542744	276395	279194	SPBC530.14c	SPAC1565.08	dsk1	cdc48	-	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429070	2539847	2543583	276395	279998	SPBC530.14c	SPAC644.12	dsk1	cdc5	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429071	2539847	2539823	276395	276373	SPBC530.14c	SPBC16A3.18	dsk1	cip1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429072	2539847	2542358	276395	278823	SPBC530.14c	SPAC1782.09c	dsk1	clp1	-	flp1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429073	2539847	2539941	276395	276485	SPBC530.14c	SPBC13E7.01	dsk1	cwf22	-	SPBC15D4.16	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429074	2539847	2539942	276395	276486	SPBC530.14c	SPBC17G9.05	dsk1	rct1	-	cyp6	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429075	2539847	2541969	276395	278454	SPBC530.14c	SPAC21E11.05c	dsk1	cyp8	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429076	2539847	2543197	276395	279626	SPBC530.14c	SPAC31A2.07c	dsk1	dbp10	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429077	2539847	2538689	276395	275274	SPBC530.14c	SPCC1795.11	dsk1	sum3	-	ded1|moc2|slh3	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429078	2539847	3361400	276395	280476	SPBC530.14c	SPAC1093.06c	dsk1	dhc1	-	SPAC30C2.01c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429079	2539847	2539847	276395	276395	SPBC530.14c	SPBC530.14c	dsk1	dsk1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429080	2539847	2539390	276395	275955	SPBC530.14c	SPCC162.07	dsk1	ent1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429081	2539847	2542174	276395	278649	SPBC530.14c	SPAC17A5.06	dsk1	ptr8	-	ercc3sp	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429082	2539847	2539303	276395	275871	SPBC530.14c	SPCC1020.09	dsk1	gnr1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429083	2539847	2541160	276395	277675	SPBC530.14c	SPBC725.09c	dsk1	hob3	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429084	2539847	2543064	276395	279497	SPBC530.14c	SPAC3G6.01	dsk1	hrp3	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429085	2539847	9407262	276395	1028625	SPBC530.14c	SPAPB1E7.14	dsk1	iec5	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429086	2539847	2540112	276395	276649	SPBC530.14c	SPBC11C11.02	dsk1	imp2	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429087	2539847	3361566	276395	280642	SPBC530.14c	SPAC29B12.01	dsk1	ino80	-	SPAC3G6.12	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429088	2539847	2540792	276395	277311	SPBC530.14c	SPBC4F6.06	dsk1	kin1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429089	2539847	2542464	276395	278925	SPBC530.14c	SPAC1A6.09c	dsk1	lag1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429090	2539847	2540908	276395	277424	SPBC530.14c	SPBC3B8.03	dsk1	SPBC3B8.03	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429091	2539847	2538838	276395	275419	SPBC530.14c	SPCC1682.02c	dsk1	mcm3	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429092	2539847	2540272	276395	276803	SPBC530.14c	SPBC31F10.09c	dsk1	nut2	-	med10	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429093	2539847	2541039	276395	277554	SPBC530.14c	SPBC3B9.19	dsk1	mge1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429094	2539847	2539540	276395	276102	SPBC530.14c	SPCC736.12c	dsk1	mmi1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429095	2539847	2541178	276395	277692	SPBC530.14c	SPBC725.02	dsk1	mpr1	-	spy1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429096	2539847	2539235	276395	275805	SPBC530.14c	SPCC1682.15	dsk1	mug122	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429097	2539847	2541723	276395	278217	SPBC530.14c	SPAC22H12.01c	dsk1	mug35	-	SPAC23G3.13c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429098	2539847	2538861	276395	275441	SPBC530.14c	SPCC1620.11	dsk1	nup97	-	mug87	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429099	2539847	2540153	276395	276689	SPBC530.14c	SPBC146.11c	dsk1	mug97	-	meu33	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429100	2539847	2539537	276395	276099	SPBC530.14c	SPCP1E11.04c	dsk1	pal1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429101	2539847	2539972	276395	276516	SPBC530.14c	SPBC16H5.02	dsk1	pfk1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429102	2539847	2539764	276395	276315	SPBC530.14c	SPBC14F5.04c	dsk1	pgk1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429103	2539847	2542917	276395	279358	SPBC530.14c	SPAC9E9.11	dsk1	plr1	-	plr	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429104	2539847	2542664	276395	279117	SPBC530.14c	SPAC1071.10c	dsk1	pma1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429105	2539847	2540019	276395	276563	SPBC530.14c	SPBC1685.01	dsk1	pmp1	-	dsp1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429106	2539847	2540231	276395	276763	SPBC530.14c	SPBC336.14c	dsk1	ppk26	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429107	2539847	2542776	276395	279225	SPBC530.14c	SPAC167.01	dsk1	ire1	-	ppk4	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429108	2539847	2539645	276395	276200	SPBC530.14c	SPBC146.07	dsk1	prp2	-	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429109	2539847	2542978	276395	279416	SPBC530.14c	SPAC10F6.02c	dsk1	prp22	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429110	2539847	2541818	276395	278309	SPBC530.14c	SPAC11G7.02	dsk1	pub1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429111	2539847	2542300	276395	278767	SPBC530.14c	SPAC1687.22c	dsk1	puf3	-	SPAC222.02c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429112	2539847	2542617	276395	279071	SPBC530.14c	SPAC13A11.01c	dsk1	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429113	2539847	2543129	276395	279561	SPBC530.14c	SPAC4F8.13c	dsk1	rng2	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429114	2539847	2541446	276395	277951	SPBC530.14c	SPAC23G3.01	dsk1	rpb2	-	SPAC521.06	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429115	2539847	2543417	276395	279839	SPBC530.14c	SPAPB1E7.03	dsk1	rpc82	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429116	2539847	2543553	276395	279970	SPBC530.14c	SPAC664.05	dsk1	rpl13	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429117	2539847	2539470	276395	276033	SPBC530.14c	SPCC576.11	dsk1	rpl15	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429118	2539847	2540358	276395	276887	SPBC530.14c	SPBC2F12.04	dsk1	rpl1701	-	rpl17|rpl17-1|SPCC2F12.04	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429119	2539847	2539308	276395	275875	SPBC530.14c	SPCC613.05c	dsk1	rpl35	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429120	2539847	2543309	276395	279733	SPBC530.14c	SPAPB8E5.06c	dsk1	rpl302	-	rpl3-2|rpl3-b	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429121	2539847	2540517	276395	277045	SPBC530.14c	SPBC29A3.04	dsk1	rpl8	-	rpl701|rpl7a	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429122	2539847	2538798	276395	275379	SPBC530.14c	SPCC1322.01	dsk1	rpm1	-	SPCC23B6.06|par1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429123	2539847	2542817	276395	279264	SPBC530.14c	SPAC13G6.02c	dsk1	rps101	-	rps1-1|rps3a-1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429124	2539847	3361259	276395	280335	SPBC530.14c	SPBP22H7.08	dsk1	rps1002	-	rps10-2|rps10B|pi023|SPACTOKYO_453.11	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429125	2539847	2543085	276395	279518	SPBC530.14c	SPAC806.03c	dsk1	rps2601	-	rps26|rps26-1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429126	2539847	2541491	276395	277993	SPBC530.14c	SPAC2C4.16c	dsk1	rps801	-	rps8|rps8-1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429127	2539847	2541919	276395	278409	SPBC530.14c	SPAC227.02c	dsk1	SPAC227.02c	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429128	2539847	2538836	276395	275417	SPBC530.14c	SPCC1281.05	dsk1	rsc7	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429129	2539847	2542545	276395	279002	SPBC530.14c	SPAC19G12.07c	dsk1	rsd1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429130	2539847	2540528	276395	277056	SPBC530.14c	SPBC18H10.04c	dsk1	sce3	-	tif48	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429131	2539847	2540768	276395	277288	SPBC530.14c	SPBC1D7.02c	dsk1	scr1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429132	2539847	2539358	276395	275924	SPBC530.14c	SPCC16C4.07	dsk1	scw1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429133	2539847	2541117	276395	277632	SPBC530.14c	SPBC646.13	dsk1	sds23	-	moc1|psp1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429134	2539847	2541942	276395	278429	SPBC530.14c	SPAC222.09	dsk1	seb1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429135	2539847	2542107	276395	278583	SPBC530.14c	SPAC30.01c	dsk1	sec72	-	sec7b|sec702	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429136	2539847	2540192	276395	276725	SPBC530.14c	SPBC1215.01	dsk1	shy1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429137	2539847	2541599	276395	278096	SPBC530.14c	SPAC24B11.11c	dsk1	sid2	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429138	2539847	2542920	276395	279361	SPBC530.14c	SPAC10F6.01c	dsk1	sir1	-	SPAC4C5.05c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429139	2539847	2541649	276395	278145	SPBC530.14c	SPAC1F3.06c	dsk1	spo15	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429140	2539847	2539818	276395	276368	SPBC530.14c	SPBC11C11.08	dsk1	srp1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429141	2539847	2542772	276395	279221	SPBC530.14c	SPAC16.02c	dsk1	srp2	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429142	2539847	2540190	276395	276723	SPBC530.14c	SPBC1271.02	dsk1	stt3	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429143	2539847	2540547	276395	277074	SPBC530.14c	SPBC32F12.11	dsk1	tdh1	-	gpd1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429144	2539847	2539295	276395	275863	SPBC530.14c	SPCC417.08	dsk1	tef3	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429145	2539847	2542290	276395	278758	SPBC530.14c	SPAC17C9.03	dsk1	tif471	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429146	2539847	2538954	276395	275528	SPBC530.14c	SPCC1753.04	dsk1	tol1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429147	2539847	2540541	276395	277068	SPBC530.14c	SPBC1A4.03c	dsk1	top2	-	ptr11	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429148	2539847	3361385	276395	280461	SPBC530.14c	SPAC1639.02c	dsk1	trk2	-	SPAC1F5.12	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429149	2539847	2542059	276395	278537	SPBC530.14c	SPAC328.06	dsk1	ubp2	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429150	2539847	2540120	276395	276657	SPBC530.14c	SPBC1703.12	dsk1	ubp9	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429151	2539847	2542461	276395	278922	SPBC530.14c	SPAC19A8.13	dsk1	usp101	-	snp1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429152	2539847	2541289	276395	277802	SPBC530.14c	SPBP35G2.09	dsk1	usp103	-	yhc1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429153	2539847	2540449	276395	276977	SPBC530.14c	SPBC2D10.08c	dsk1	SPBC2D10.08c	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Dsk1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified 131 direct Dsk1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429176	3361532	2542968	280608	279408	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC11E3.02c	lkh1	SPAC11E3.02c	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429177	3361532	2542958	280608	279398	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC12G12.09	lkh1	SPAC12G12.09	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429178	3361532	2542452	280608	278913	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC1D4.02c	lkh1	SPAC1D4.02c	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429179	3361532	3361454	280608	280530	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC1D4.14	lkh1	tho2	kic1	SPAC22F3.14c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429180	3361532	2541498	280608	278000	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC227.10	lkh1	SPAC227.10	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429181	3361532	2542088	280608	278565	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC26F1.07	lkh1	SPAC26F1.07	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429182	3361532	2543517	280608	279935	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC3G9.05	lkh1	spa2	kic1	SPAC3G9.05	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429183	3361532	2542740	280608	279190	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC9G1.06c	lkh1	cyk3	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429184	3361532	2540175	280608	276708	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC106.16	lkh1	pre6	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429185	3361532	2539743	280608	276295	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC16A3.08c	lkh1	oga1	kic1	SPBC16A3.08c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429186	3361532	2540078	280608	276616	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC16H5.08c	lkh1	SPBC16H5.08c	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429187	3361532	2540086	280608	276624	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC16H5.12c	lkh1	SPBC16H5.12c	kic1	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429188	3361532	2540808	280608	277327	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC418.02	lkh1	SPBC418.02	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429189	3361532	2541139	280608	277654	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC646.16	lkh1	scl1	kic1	SPBC646.16	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429190	3361532	2541323	280608	277835	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBP35G2.14	lkh1	SPBP35G2.14	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429191	3361532	2539051	280608	275624	SPAC1D4.11c	SPCC1183.11	lkh1	msy1	kic1	SPCC1183.11|SPCC31H12.01	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429192	3361532	2538971	280608	275545	SPAC1D4.11c	SPCC1322.10	lkh1	SPCC1322.10	kic1	pwp1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429193	3361532	2539361	280608	275927	SPAC1D4.11c	SPCC162.01c	lkh1	SPCC162.01c	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429194	3361532	2539315	280608	275881	SPAC1D4.11c	SPCC1739.01	lkh1	SPCC1739.01	kic1	SPCC1906.05	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429195	3361532	2538869	280608	275449	SPAC1D4.11c	SPCC777.02	lkh1	SPCC777.02	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429196	3361532	2540036	280608	276578	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC1289.17	lkh1	Tf2-11	kic1	SPBC8E4.11c|tf2-1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429197	3361532	2540051	280608	276589	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC32H8.12c	lkh1	act1	kic1	cps8|pi012	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429198	3361532	2543372	280608	279794	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAPB1A10.09	lkh1	ase1	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429199	3361532	2540498	280608	277026	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC27.02c	lkh1	ask1	kic1	mug181	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429200	3361532	2539244	280608	275814	SPAC1D4.11c	SPCC1672.06c	lkh1	asp1	kic1	vip1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429201	3361532	2538700	280608	275285	SPAC1D4.11c	SPCC645.13	lkh1	SPCC645.13	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429202	3361532	2541975	280608	278460	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC20G8.05c	lkh1	cdc15	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429203	3361532	2539823	280608	276373	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC16A3.18	lkh1	cip1	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429204	3361532	2543197	280608	279626	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC31A2.07c	lkh1	dbp10	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429205	3361532	2542503	280608	278961	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC19A8.12	lkh1	dcp2	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429206	3361532	2539788	280608	276338	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC17D1.02	lkh1	dph2	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429207	3361532	2539692	280608	276246	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC14C8.03	lkh1	fma2	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429208	3361532	2542869	280608	279314	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC140.02	lkh1	gar2	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429209	3361532	2542035	280608	278517	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAP8A3.04c	lkh1	hsp9	kic1	scf1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429210	3361532	2540112	280608	276649	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC11C11.02	lkh1	imp2	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429211	3361532	3361532	280608	280608	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC1D4.11c	lkh1	lkh1	kic1	kic1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429212	3361532	3361210	280608	280286	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC16E9.16c	lkh1	lsd90	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429213	3361532	2542041	280608	278522	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC27E2.09	lkh1	mak2	kic1	phk1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429214	3361532	3361499	280608	280575	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC25H1.09	lkh1	mde5	kic1	SPAC4A8.01|meu30	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429215	3361532	2541178	280608	277692	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC725.02	lkh1	mpr1	kic1	spy1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429216	3361532	2540695	280608	277219	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC19G7.01c	lkh1	msh2	kic1	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429217	3361532	2538916	280608	275493	SPAC1D4.11c	SPCC16C4.17	lkh1	mug123	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429218	3361532	2540250	280608	276782	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC336.15	lkh1	pic1	kic1	SPBC685.01	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429219	3361532	2539992	280608	276536	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC1289.04c	lkh1	pob1	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429220	3361532	2540072	280608	276610	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC16H5.07c	lkh1	ppa2	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429221	3361532	2541619	280608	278116	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC27F1.09c	lkh1	prp10	kic1	sap155|SF3b155	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429222	3361532	2542978	280608	279416	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC10F6.02c	lkh1	prp22	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429223	3361532	2541818	280608	278309	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC11G7.02	lkh1	pub1	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429224	3361532	2540635	280608	277161	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC23G7.08c	lkh1	rga7	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429225	3361532	2542132	280608	278608	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC1952.16	lkh1	rga9	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429226	3361532	2541989	280608	278473	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC23A1.08c	lkh1	rpl3401	kic1	rpl34|rpl34-1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429227	3361532	2539308	280608	275875	SPAC1D4.11c	SPCC613.05c	lkh1	rpl35	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429228	3361532	2543085	280608	279518	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC806.03c	lkh1	rps2601	kic1	rps26|rps26-1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429229	3361532	2542545	280608	279002	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC19G12.07c	lkh1	rsd1	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429230	3361532	2541322	280608	277834	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBP4H10.09	lkh1	rsv1	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429231	3361532	2539943	280608	276487	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC14F5.05c	lkh1	sam1	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429232	3361532	2540528	280608	277056	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC18H10.04c	lkh1	sce3	kic1	tif48	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429233	3361532	2539358	280608	275924	SPAC1D4.11c	SPCC16C4.07	lkh1	scw1	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429234	3361532	2539232	280608	275802	SPAC1D4.11c	SPCC1223.04c	lkh1	set11	kic1	mug76	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429235	3361532	2542638	280608	279092	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC1250.01	lkh1	snf21	kic1	SPAC29A4.21|brg1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429236	3361532	2541781	280608	278274	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC23G3.07c	lkh1	snf30	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429237	3361532	2541916	280608	278406	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC23C4.19	lkh1	spt5	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429238	3361532	2542824	280608	279271	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC144.13c	lkh1	srw1	kic1	ste9	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429239	3361532	3361461	280608	280537	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC11H11.01	lkh1	sst6	kic1	cps23	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429240	3361532	2541225	280608	277739	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC887.15c	lkh1	sur2	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429241	3361532	2540547	280608	277074	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC32F12.11	lkh1	tdh1	kic1	gpd1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429242	3361532	2539194	280608	275765	SPAC1D4.11c	SPCC1682.07	lkh1	ssl1	kic1	tfh47	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429243	3361532	2542653	280608	279107	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC9E9.06c	lkh1	SPAC9E9.06c	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429244	3361532	2542290	280608	278758	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC17C9.03	lkh1	tif471	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429245	3361532	2542059	280608	278537	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC328.06	lkh1	ubp2	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429246	3361532	2540120	280608	276657	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC1703.12	lkh1	ubp9	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429247	3361532	2543009	280608	279447	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC10F6.06	lkh1	vip1	kic1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429248	3361532	2542873	280608	279318	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC9G1.02	lkh1	wis4	kic1	wak1|wik1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lipp JJ (2015)	26167880	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	We labeled fission yeast extracts with N6-phenethyl-ATP-gammaS in the presence of either recombinant WT or analog-sensitive Lkh1. We then purified thiophosphorylated peptides and identified Lkh1 substrates as well as their phosphorylation sites by MS	-	BIOGRID
1429655	2539928	2539644	276472	276199	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC16E9.01c	imp1	php4	-	SPBP16F5.09c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Khan MG (2014)	25330182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1429656	2539426	2539644	275991	276199	SPCC962.03c	SPBC16E9.01c	cut15	php4	-	SPBP16F5.09c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Khan MG (2014)	25330182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1429657	2539387	2539644	275952	276199	SPCC1840.03	SPBC16E9.01c	sal3	php4	pse1	SPBP16F5.09c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Khan MG (2014)	25330182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1429658	2539352	2542414	275918	278878	SPCC188.07	SPAC6F6.16c	ccq1	tpz1	-	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu J (2015)	26365187	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	crosslinked for MICro-MS	-	BIOGRID
1429670	2539352	2543580	275918	279995	SPCC188.07	SPAC644.14c	ccq1	rad51	-	rhp51	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Liu J (2015)	26365187	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	deletion of rad51 in ccq1-F157A/K174E immediately abrogates the stably maintained short telomeres in ccq1-F157A/K174E cells	-	BIOGRID
1429671	2540821	2539352	277339	275918	SPBC800.03	SPCC188.07	clr3	ccq1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Liu J (2015)	26365187	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1429672	2542244	2542414	278714	278878	SPAC19G12.13c	SPAC6F6.16c	poz1	tpz1	-	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu J (2015)	26365187	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	crosslinked for MICro-MS	-	BIOGRID
1429673	2542244	2542414	278714	278878	SPAC19G12.13c	SPAC6F6.16c	poz1	tpz1	-	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Liu J (2015)	26365187	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1429674	2539352	2542414	275918	278878	SPCC188.07	SPAC6F6.16c	ccq1	tpz1	-	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Liu J (2015)	26365187	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1429679	2542414	2542244	278878	278714	SPAC6F6.16c	SPAC19G12.13c	tpz1	poz1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Liu J (2015)	26365187	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1429680	2542414	2539352	278878	275918	SPAC6F6.16c	SPCC188.07	tpz1	ccq1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Liu J (2015)	26365187	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1429681	2542414	2542703	278878	279156	SPAC6F6.16c	SPAC26H5.06	tpz1	pot1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Liu J (2015)	26365187	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1429682	2542414	2542703	278878	279156	SPAC6F6.16c	SPAC26H5.06	tpz1	pot1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Liu J (2015)	26365187	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1429683	2542414	2539352	278878	275918	SPAC6F6.16c	SPCC188.07	tpz1	ccq1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Liu J (2015)	26365187	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1429684	2542414	2542703	278878	279156	SPAC6F6.16c	SPAC26H5.06	tpz1	pot1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Liu J (2015)	26365187	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	when we coupled pot1-I453R or pot1-F520A with tpz1-I200R, the double mutant showed no telomere signal, with part of the subtelomeric regions disappeared concomitantly	-	BIOGRID
1429686	2541600	2540494	278097	277022	SPAC6F12.17	SPBC409.04c	rna14	mis12	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sonkar A (2015)	26581324	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance|cold sensitivity	double mutants show decreased permissive temperature and increased cut phenotype	-	BIOGRID
1429687	2541600	2538736	278097	275320	SPAC6F12.17	SPCC1322.12c	rna14	bub1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sonkar A (2015)	26581324	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance|cold sensitivity	double mutants show decreased permissive temperature and increased cut phenotype	-	BIOGRID
1429688	2541600	2540589	278097	277115	SPAC6F12.17	SPBC20F10.06	rna14	mad2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sonkar A (2015)	26581324	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity	double mutants show decreased permissive temperature	-	BIOGRID
1429689	2542655	2542732	279109	279182	SPAC3A11.14c	SPAC25G10.07c	pkl1	cut7	SPAC3H5.03c|klp1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Syrovatkina V (2015)	26031557	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:partial rescue	deletion of cut7 reduces the frequency of protrusions	-	BIOGRID
1429690	2539908	2542732	276454	279182	SPBC13E7.06	SPAC25G10.07c	msd1	cut7	mug172	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Syrovatkina V (2015)	26031557	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:partial rescue	deletion of cut7 reduces the frequency of protrusions	-	BIOGRID
1435263	5802740	2542674	857878	279127	SPNCRNA.103	SPAC26A3.12c	sme2	dhp1	SPNCRNA.1341	rat1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chalamcharla VR (2015)	26631744	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
1435273	2542173	2542674	278648	279127	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC26A3.12c	mtl1	dhp1	SPAC17H9.02	rat1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chalamcharla VR (2015)	26631744	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435274	2539540	2542674	276102	279127	SPCC736.12c	SPAC26A3.12c	mmi1	dhp1	-	rat1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chalamcharla VR (2015)	26631744	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435275	2542674	2539403	279127	275968	SPAC26A3.12c	SPCC736.11	dhp1	ago1	rat1	csp9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Chalamcharla VR (2015)	26631744	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis|silencing	ago1/dhp1-2 mutants showed cumulative defects in silencing and elevated levels of haploid meiosis|we observed a cumulative increase in dg/dh transcript levels when dhp1-2 was combined with ago1 deletion	-	BIOGRID
1435276	2543630	2542674	280044	279127	SPAC1F3.01	SPAC26A3.12c	rrp6	dhp1	SPAC3H8.11	rat1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chalamcharla VR (2015)	26631744	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	deletion of Dhp1 caused a decrease in abbreviated transcripts in the rrp6/dhp1-2 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
1435277	2539403	2541941	275968	278428	SPCC736.11	SPAC20H4.03c	ago1	tfs1	csp9	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chalamcharla VR (2015)	26631744	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	tfs1 restores  heterochromatin-mediated silencing in an ago1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1435278	2541941	2542674	278428	279127	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC26A3.12c	tfs1	dhp1	-	rat1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chalamcharla VR (2015)	26631744	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	deletion of dhp1 inhibits the restoration of heterochromatin-mediated silencing by tfs1 in an ago1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1435279	2542674	2542540	279127	278997	SPAC26A3.12c	SPAC19D5.06c	dhp1	din1	rat1	rai1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chalamcharla VR (2015)	26631744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435280	2542674	2539733	279127	276285	SPAC26A3.12c	SPBC16E9.12c	dhp1	pab2	rat1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chalamcharla VR (2015)	26631744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435281	2542674	2541536	279127	278036	SPAC26A3.12c	SPAC1071.02	dhp1	mms19	rat1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chalamcharla VR (2015)	26631744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435282	2542674	2540691	279127	277216	SPAC26A3.12c	SPBC20F10.05	dhp1	nrl1	rat1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chalamcharla VR (2015)	26631744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435283	2542674	2539050	279127	275623	SPAC26A3.12c	SPCC11E10.08	dhp1	rik1	rat1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chalamcharla VR (2015)	26631744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435284	2542674	2540047	279127	276585	SPAC26A3.12c	SPBC16C6.10	dhp1	chp2	rat1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chalamcharla VR (2015)	26631744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435285	2542674	2543630	279127	280044	SPAC26A3.12c	SPAC1F3.01	dhp1	rrp6	rat1	SPAC3H8.11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chalamcharla VR (2015)	26631744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435286	2542674	2539248	279127	275818	SPAC26A3.12c	SPCC1739.03	dhp1	hrr1	rat1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chalamcharla VR (2015)	26631744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435287	2542674	2542198	279127	278673	SPAC26A3.12c	SPAC6F12.09	dhp1	rdp1	rat1	rdr1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chalamcharla VR (2015)	26631744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435288	2542674	2539540	279127	276102	SPAC26A3.12c	SPCC736.12c	dhp1	mmi1	rat1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chalamcharla VR (2015)	26631744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435289	2542674	2539420	279127	275985	SPAC26A3.12c	SPCC970.07c	dhp1	raf2	rat1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chalamcharla VR (2015)	26631744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435290	2539050	2542674	275623	279127	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC26A3.12c	rik1	dhp1	-	rat1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chalamcharla VR (2015)	26631744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435291	2539248	2542674	275818	279127	SPCC1739.03	SPAC26A3.12c	hrr1	dhp1	-	rat1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chalamcharla VR (2015)	26631744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435292	2542198	2542674	278673	279127	SPAC6F12.09	SPAC26A3.12c	rdp1	dhp1	rdr1	rat1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chalamcharla VR (2015)	26631744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435293	2540735	2542674	277258	279127	SPBC83.03c	SPAC26A3.12c	tas3	dhp1	-	rat1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chalamcharla VR (2015)	26631744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435294	2539420	2542674	275985	279127	SPCC970.07c	SPAC26A3.12c	raf2	dhp1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	rat1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chalamcharla VR (2015)	26631744	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435388	2542313	2542313	278779	278779	SPAC16A10.07c	SPAC16A10.07c	taz1	taz1	myb|myb1	myb|myb1	Two-hybrid	physical	Deng W (2015)	26088418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435389	2542313	2542313	278779	278779	SPAC16A10.07c	SPAC16A10.07c	taz1	taz1	myb|myb1	myb|myb1	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Deng W (2015)	26088418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435390	2541652	2541055	278148	277570	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC409.07c	sty1	wis1	phh1|spc1	smf2|spc2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Vazquez B (2015)	26432170	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435391	2539920	2540919	276464	277435	SPBC119.08	SPBC543.07	pmk1	pek1	spm1	mkk1|skh1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Vazquez B (2015)	26432170	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435392	2542394	2540604	278858	277130	SPAC31G5.12c	SPBC25D12.05	maf1	trm1	n150	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Arimbasseri AG (2015)	26720005	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:partial rescue	overexpression of trm1 in maf1 mutants led to substantial reversal of the antisuppression phenotype in the context of elevated tRNA levels in these cells	-	BIOGRID
1435393	2540618	2542378	277144	278842	SPBC3D6.11c	SPAC1805.04	slx8	nup132	-	Nup133b	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nie M (2015)	26221037	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
1435394	2542268	2542378	278737	278842	SPAC17A5.07c	SPAC1805.04	ulp2	nup132	-	Nup133b	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nie M (2015)	26221037	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
1435395	2542378	2540734	278842	277257	SPAC1805.04	SPBC19G7.09	nup132	ulp1	Nup133b	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nie M (2015)	26221037	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:wild type	overexpression of Ulp1 in nup132 mutant cells restored normal Pli1 levels	-	BIOGRID
1435396	2542378	2541580	278842	278077	SPAC1805.04	SPAC1687.05	nup132	pli1	Nup133b	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nie M (2015)	26221037	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Increased Pli1 dosage also restored SUMO conjugates in nup132 mutant cells|overxpression of Pli1 inhibited the rescue of slx8 by nup132	-	BIOGRID
1435397	2542268	2541580	278737	278077	SPAC17A5.07c	SPAC1687.05	ulp2	pli1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nie M (2015)	26221037	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
1435475	2543277	2541585	279705	278082	SPAC1002.03c	SPAC14C4.05c	gls2	man1	gls2alpha	heh2|mug61	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435476	2543275	2543646	279703	280060	SPAC1002.05c	SPAC821.07c	jmj2	moc3	kdm5	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435477	2543272	2543272	279700	279700	SPAC1002.07c	SPAC1002.07c	ats1	ats1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435478	2543272	2541222	279700	277736	SPAC1002.07c	SPBC887.08	ats1	SPBC887.08	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435479	2543264	2540635	279692	277161	SPAC1002.14	SPBC23G7.08c	itt1	rga7	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435480	2543260	2543260	279688	279688	SPAC1002.17c	SPAC1002.17c	urg2	urg2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435481	2543260	2541941	279688	278428	SPAC1002.17c	SPAC20H4.03c	urg2	tfs1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435482	2543260	2543517	279688	279935	SPAC1002.17c	SPAC3G9.05	urg2	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435483	2543254	2542173	279682	278648	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC17H9.02	red1	mtl1	iss3	SPAC17H9.02	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435484	2543254	2541655	279682	278151	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC7D4.14c	red1	iss10	iss3	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435485	2543147	2543147	279579	279579	SPAC1006.05c	SPAC1006.05c	och1	och1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435486	2543147	2541184	279579	277698	SPAC1006.05c	SPBC725.17c	och1	rrn11	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435487	2542948	2538714	279388	275298	SPAC1006.07	SPCC330.11	SPAC1006.07	btb1	tif1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435488	2542956	2541585	279396	278082	SPAC1039.01	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC1039.01	man1	-	heh2|mug61	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435489	2542996	2539404	279434	275969	SPAC1039.06	SPCC191.01	SPAC1039.06	SPCC191.01	-	SPCC417.13	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435490	2542932	2542932	279373	279373	SPAC1039.08	SPAC1039.08	SPAC1039.08	SPAC1039.08	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435491	2542932	2539928	279373	276472	SPAC1039.08	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC1039.08	imp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435492	2542985	2542985	279423	279423	SPAC105.03c	SPAC105.03c	SPAC105.03c	SPAC105.03c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435493	2542985	2542936	279423	279377	SPAC105.03c	SPAC12G12.06c	SPAC105.03c	SPAC12G12.06c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435494	2542985	2542409	279423	278873	SPAC105.03c	SPAC17G8.10c	SPAC105.03c	dma1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435495	2542985	2541941	279423	278428	SPAC105.03c	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC105.03c	tfs1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435496	2542985	2543517	279423	279935	SPAC105.03c	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC105.03c	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435497	2542985	2543622	279423	280036	SPAC105.03c	SPAC4D7.09	SPAC105.03c	tif223	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435498	2542985	2543221	279423	279649	SPAC105.03c	SPAC637.04	SPAC105.03c	SPAC637.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435499	2542985	2541456	279423	277959	SPAC105.03c	SPAC6G9.04	SPAC105.03c	spo7	-	mug79	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435500	2542985	2539838	279423	276387	SPAC105.03c	SPBC1347.10	SPAC105.03c	cdc23	-	mcm10	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435501	2542985	2540929	279423	277445	SPAC105.03c	SPBC354.03	SPAC105.03c	swd3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435502	2541536	2541536	278036	278036	SPAC1071.02	SPAC1071.02	mms19	mms19	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435503	2541536	2540578	278036	277104	SPAC1071.02	SPBC26H8.06	mms19	grx4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435504	2541540	2541540	278040	278040	SPAC1071.06	SPAC1071.06	arp9	arp9	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435505	2541540	2541496	278040	277998	SPAC1071.06	SPAC23D3.09	arp9	arp42	-	arp4	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435506	3361433	2543290	280509	279715	SPAC1071.12c	SPAC9E9.10c	stp1	cbh1	SPAC926.01c	cbh	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435507	2542921	2541735	279362	278229	SPAC1093.01	SPAC7D4.04	ppr5	atg11	SPAC12B10.18	taf1|cvt9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435508	2542921	2541495	279362	277997	SPAC1093.01	SPAP8A3.02c	ppr5	ofd2	SPAC12B10.18	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435509	2542921	2542482	279362	278942	SPAC1093.01	SPAP8A3.06	ppr5	uaf2	SPAC12B10.18	SPAP8A3.06|ods2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435510	2542921	2539631	279362	276187	SPAC1093.01	SPBC16G5.16	ppr5	SPBC16G5.16	SPAC12B10.18	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435511	2542921	2539785	279362	276335	SPAC1093.01	SPBC1773.16c	ppr5	SPBC1773.16c	SPAC12B10.18	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435512	2542921	2539349	279362	275915	SPAC1093.01	SPCC613.11c	ppr5	meu23	SPAC12B10.18	B13958-2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435513	2542977	2542977	279415	279415	SPAC1093.04c	SPAC1093.04c	SPAC1093.04c	SPAC1093.04c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435514	2542973	2541956	279412	278443	SPAC10F6.04	SPAC139.03	SPAC10F6.04	toe2	-	SPAC139.03	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435515	2542973	2542546	279412	279003	SPAC10F6.04	SPAC1399.05c	SPAC10F6.04	toe1	-	SPAC1399.05c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435516	2542973	2543434	279412	279854	SPAC10F6.04	SPAC8F11.02c	SPAC10F6.04	dph3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435517	2542973	2540372	279412	276901	SPAC10F6.04	SPBC31F10.03	SPAC10F6.04	SPBC31F10.03	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435518	2541642	2541585	278138	278082	SPAC10F6.05c	SPAC14C4.05c	ubc6	man1	-	heh2|mug61	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435519	2541642	2540730	278138	277253	SPAC10F6.05c	SPBC19C2.09	ubc6	sre1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435520	2543009	2543009	279447	279447	SPAC10F6.06	SPAC10F6.06	vip1	vip1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435521	2543009	2541727	279447	278221	SPAC10F6.06	SPAC22H10.12c	vip1	gdi1	-	sec19	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435522	2543009	2542733	279447	279183	SPAC10F6.06	SPAC6F12.04	vip1	SPAC6F12.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435523	2543009	2539171	279447	275742	SPAC10F6.06	SPCC830.08c	vip1	yop1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435524	2542665	2542665	279118	279118	SPAC10F6.08c	SPAC10F6.08c	nht10	nht10	nht1	nht1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435525	2543011	2541771	279449	278265	SPAC10F6.11c	SPAC23H3.06	atg17	apl6	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435526	2541715	2541735	278210	278229	SPAC110.01	SPAC7D4.04	ppk1	atg11	SPAC140.05	taf1|cvt9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435527	2541628	2539631	278124	276187	SPAC110.02	SPBC16G5.16	pds5	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435528	2542197	2542197	278672	278672	SPAC1142.01	SPAC1142.01	rqc1	rqc1	SPAC1142.01|SPAC17G6.18	SPAC1142.01|SPAC17G6.18	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435529	2542666	2542666	279119	279119	SPAC1142.04	SPAC1142.04	SPAC1142.04	SPAC1142.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435530	2542666	2541728	279119	278222	SPAC1142.04	SPAC20G4.03c	SPAC1142.04	hri1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435531	2542666	3361548	279119	280624	SPAC1142.04	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC1142.04	atg6	-	SPAC3A12.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435532	2542666	2541730	279119	278224	SPAC1142.04	SPAC22H10.11c	SPAC1142.04	SPAC22H10.11c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435533	2542666	2543084	279119	279517	SPAC1142.04	SPAC31G5.19	SPAC1142.04	abo1	-	SPAC31G5.19	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435534	2542666	2543648	279119	280062	SPAC1142.04	SPAC4F10.09c	SPAC1142.04	SPAC4F10.09c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435535	2542666	2542619	279119	279073	SPAC1142.04	SPAC6G10.02c	SPAC1142.04	tea3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435536	2542666	2539740	279119	276292	SPAC1142.04	SPBC1685.04	SPAC1142.04	SPBC1685.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435537	2542666	2539906	279119	276452	SPAC1142.04	SPBC16G5.17	SPAC1142.04	SPBC16G5.17	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435538	2542666	2540712	279119	277235	SPAC1142.04	SPBC216.02	SPAC1142.04	mcp5	-	mug21|num1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435539	2542666	2540409	279119	276937	SPAC1142.04	SPBC2D10.11c	SPAC1142.04	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435540	2542666	2540931	279119	277447	SPAC1142.04	SPBC365.07c	SPAC1142.04	SPBC365.07c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435541	2542666	2540821	279119	277339	SPAC1142.04	SPBC800.03	SPAC1142.04	clr3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435542	2542666	2540735	279119	277258	SPAC1142.04	SPBC83.03c	SPAC1142.04	tas3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435543	2542666	2541287	279119	277800	SPAC1142.04	SPBP22H7.05c	SPAC1142.04	abo2	-	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435544	2542666	2541358	279119	277869	SPAC1142.04	SPBP4H10.16c	SPAC1142.04	SPBP4H10.16c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435545	2542666	2539538	279119	276100	SPAC1142.04	SPCC364.06	SPAC1142.04	nap1	-	nap11	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435546	2542928	2541585	279369	278082	SPAC1142.06	SPAC14C4.05c	get3	man1	-	heh2|mug61	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435547	2542928	2542124	279369	278600	SPAC1142.06	SPAC19A8.14	get3	SPAC19A8.14	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435548	2542928	2541815	279369	278306	SPAC1142.06	SPAC22A12.15c	get3	bip1	-	bip	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435549	2542928	2541508	279369	278010	SPAC1142.06	SPAC24H6.01c	get3	SPAC24H6.01c	-	SPAPB21F2.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435550	2542928	2542688	279369	279141	SPAC1142.06	SPAC25B8.01	get3	dap1	-	SPAC26H5.15	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435551	2542928	2543041	279369	279476	SPAC1142.06	SPAC3C7.11c	get3	cnx1	-	cal1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435552	2542928	2543431	279369	279851	SPAC1142.06	SPAC630.04c	get3	SPAC630.04c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435553	2542928	2542959	279369	279399	SPAC1142.06	SPAC6F12.07	get3	tom20	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435554	2542928	2540079	279369	276617	SPAC1142.06	SPBC13G1.03c	get3	pex14	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435555	2542928	2541038	279369	277553	SPAC1142.06	SPBC29A10.01	get3	ccr1	-	SPBC365.17	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435556	2542928	2540958	279369	277474	SPAC1142.06	SPBC409.19c	get3	SPBC409.19c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435557	2542928	2540862	279369	277379	SPAC1142.06	SPBC4C3.06	get3	syp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435558	2542928	2541395	279369	277904	SPAC1142.06	SPBP8B7.25	get3	cyp4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435559	2542928	2538767	279369	275350	SPAC1142.06	SPCC1672.12c	get3	get4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435560	2542928	2538908	279369	275485	SPAC1142.06	SPCC970.02	get3	SPCC970.02	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435561	2542928	2538854	279369	275435	SPAC1142.06	SPCP1E11.05c	get3	are2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435562	2542922	2540725	279363	277248	SPAC1142.07c	SPBC215.14c	vps32	vps20	snf7	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435563	2542974	2542974	279413	279413	SPAC11D3.02c	SPAC11D3.02c	SPAC11D3.02c	SPAC11D3.02c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435564	2542947	2540240	279387	276772	SPAC11D3.03c	SPBC31F10.16	SPAC11D3.03c	SPBC31F10.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435565	2543007	2543007	279445	279445	SPAC11D3.04c	SPAC11D3.04c	SPAC11D3.04c	SPAC11D3.04c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435566	2543007	2542452	279445	278913	SPAC11D3.04c	SPAC1D4.02c	SPAC11D3.04c	SPAC1D4.02c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435567	2543007	2539182	279445	275753	SPAC11D3.04c	SPCC16A11.16c	SPAC11D3.04c	rpn1302	-	rpn13|rpn13b	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435568	2543000	2538878	279438	275457	SPAC11E3.07	SPCC11E10.03	vma4	mug1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435569	2541512	2540911	278013	277427	SPAC11E3.08c	SPBC651.10	nse6	nse5	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435570	2541818	2542245	278309	278715	SPAC11G7.02	SPAC17A5.10	pub1	SPAC17A5.10	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435571	2541818	2542260	278309	278729	SPAC11G7.02	SPAC1F12.05	pub1	SPAC1F12.05	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435572	2541818	2543517	278309	279935	SPAC11G7.02	SPAC3G9.05	pub1	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435573	2541818	2540833	278309	277351	SPAC11G7.02	SPBC18H10.20c	pub1	any1	-	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435574	2541818	2541133	278309	277648	SPAC11G7.02	SPBC660.05	pub1	SPBC660.05	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435575	2541818	2541205	278309	277719	SPAC11G7.02	SPBC839.02	pub1	SPBC839.02	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435576	2541818	2541281	278309	277794	SPAC11G7.02	SPBC902.04	pub1	rmn1	-	SPBC902.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435577	2541818	2541384	278309	277895	SPAC11G7.02	SPBP8B7.26	pub1	SPBP8B7.26	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435578	2541662	3361526	278158	280602	SPAC11G7.05c	SPAC664.15	SPAC11G7.05c	caf4	-	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435579	3361461	2543290	280537	279715	SPAC11H11.01	SPAC9E9.10c	sst6	cbh1	cps23	cbh	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435580	3361461	2540821	280537	277339	SPAC11H11.01	SPBC800.03	sst6	clr3	cps23	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435581	2541436	2542958	277941	279398	SPAC11H11.03c	SPAC12G12.09	SPAC11H11.03c	SPAC12G12.09	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435582	5802965	2541585	858103	278082	SPAC11H11.06	SPAC14C4.05c	arp2	man1	SPAC22F8.01	heh2|mug61	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435583	2541565	3361391	278063	280467	SPAC1250.03	SPAC13G6.01c	ubc14	rad8	-	SPAC5H10.14c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435584	5802974	2543198	858112	279627	SPAC1250.07	SPAC31A2.11c	sfc7	cuf1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435585	2541575	2539631	278072	276187	SPAC12B10.01c	SPBC16G5.16	SPAC12B10.01c	SPBC16G5.16	SPAC31F12.02c|SPAC637.15c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435586	2543004	2541585	279442	278082	SPAC12B10.02c	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC12B10.02c	man1	-	heh2|mug61	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435587	2542705	2543580	279158	279995	SPAC12B10.06c	SPAC644.14c	emi5	rad51	SPAC12B10.06c	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435588	2542705	3361526	279158	280602	SPAC12B10.06c	SPAC664.15	emi5	caf4	SPAC12B10.06c	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435589	2542705	2539631	279158	276187	SPAC12B10.06c	SPBC16G5.16	emi5	SPBC16G5.16	SPAC12B10.06c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435590	2542705	2540409	279158	276937	SPAC12B10.06c	SPBC2D10.11c	emi5	nap2	SPAC12B10.06c	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435591	2542705	2540306	279158	276836	SPAC12B10.06c	SPBC2G5.02c	emi5	ckb2	SPAC12B10.06c	SPBC2G5.02c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435592	2542705	2538952	279158	275526	SPAC12B10.06c	SPCC1235.10c	emi5	sec6	SPAC12B10.06c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435593	2542967	2540481	279407	277009	SPAC12B10.12c	SPBC2D10.12	rhp41	rhp23	rhp4a	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435594	2543008	2539994	279446	276538	SPAC12B10.13	SPBC1105.06	SPAC12B10.13	pmc4	-	med4	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435595	2543100	2542619	279532	279073	SPAC12B10.14c	SPAC6G10.02c	tea5	tea3	ppk2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435596	2543139	2543139	279571	279571	SPAC12G12.03	SPAC12G12.03	cip2	cip2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435597	2543139	2542474	279571	278934	SPAC12G12.03	SPAC31G5.09c	cip2	spk1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435598	2542936	2542435	279377	278897	SPAC12G12.06c	SPAC1805.16c	SPAC12G12.06c	SPAC1805.16c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435599	2542936	3361548	279377	280624	SPAC12G12.06c	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC12G12.06c	atg6	-	SPAC3A12.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435600	2542936	2542635	279377	279089	SPAC12G12.06c	SPAC24H6.09	SPAC12G12.06c	gef1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435601	2542936	2542096	279377	278572	SPAC12G12.06c	SPAC26H5.02c	SPAC12G12.06c	SPAC26H5.02c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435602	2542936	2541620	279377	278117	SPAC12G12.06c	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC12G12.06c	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435603	2542936	2541709	279377	278204	SPAC12G12.06c	SPAC3C7.02c	SPAC12G12.06c	pil2	-	SPAC3C7.02c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435604	2542936	2543157	279377	279588	SPAC12G12.06c	SPAC3F10.12c	SPAC12G12.06c	SPAC3F10.12c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435605	2542936	3361526	279377	280602	SPAC12G12.06c	SPAC664.15	SPAC12G12.06c	caf4	-	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435606	2542936	2542619	279377	279073	SPAC12G12.06c	SPAC6G10.02c	SPAC12G12.06c	tea3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435607	2542936	2541735	279377	278229	SPAC12G12.06c	SPAC7D4.04	SPAC12G12.06c	atg11	-	taf1|cvt9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435608	2542936	2543646	279377	280060	SPAC12G12.06c	SPAC821.07c	SPAC12G12.06c	moc3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435609	2542936	2543290	279377	279715	SPAC12G12.06c	SPAC9E9.10c	SPAC12G12.06c	cbh1	-	cbh	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435610	2542936	2539728	279377	276280	SPAC12G12.06c	SPBC14F5.12c	SPAC12G12.06c	cbh2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435611	2542936	2539631	279377	276187	SPAC12G12.06c	SPBC16G5.16	SPAC12G12.06c	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435612	2542936	2540409	279377	276937	SPAC12G12.06c	SPBC2D10.11c	SPAC12G12.06c	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435613	2542936	2540735	279377	277258	SPAC12G12.06c	SPBC83.03c	SPAC12G12.06c	tas3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435614	2542936	2538952	279377	275526	SPAC12G12.06c	SPCC1235.10c	SPAC12G12.06c	sec6	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435615	2542936	2539562	279377	276123	SPAC12G12.06c	SPCC569.01c	SPAC12G12.06c	SPCC569.01c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435616	2542936	2539349	279377	275915	SPAC12G12.06c	SPCC613.11c	SPAC12G12.06c	meu23	-	B13958-2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435617	2542958	2542503	279398	278961	SPAC12G12.09	SPAC19A8.12	SPAC12G12.09	dcp2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435618	2542958	2543409	279398	279831	SPAC12G12.09	SPAC4D7.13	SPAC12G12.09	usp104	-	prp40	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435619	2542918	2541585	279359	278082	SPAC12G12.12	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC12G12.12	man1	-	heh2|mug61	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435620	2543092	2538829	279525	275410	SPAC1327.01c	SPCC306.09c	SPAC1327.01c	cap1	SPAC1783.09c|SPAC18G6.16c	cap	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435621	2541762	2543209	278256	279638	SPAC139.01c	SPAC3G6.03c	SPAC139.01c	SPAC3G6.03c	SPAC955.02c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435622	2541762	2540677	278256	277202	SPAC139.01c	SPBC21B10.03c	SPAC139.01c	ath1	SPAC955.02c	SPBC21B10.03c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435623	2541956	2542294	278443	278762	SPAC139.03	SPAC1805.09c	toe2	fmt1	SPAC139.03	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435624	2541956	2541537	278443	278037	SPAC139.03	SPAC1F5.06	toe2	lsh1	SPAC139.03	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435625	2541956	2541917	278443	278407	SPAC139.03	SPAC23C4.17	toe2	trm402	SPAC139.03	SPAC23C4.17|trm4|trm4b	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435626	2541956	2539728	278443	276280	SPAC139.03	SPBC14F5.12c	toe2	cbh2	SPAC139.03	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435627	2541956	2540025	278443	276569	SPAC139.03	SPBC16G5.01	toe2	rpn12	SPAC139.03	SPBC342.07|mts3	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435628	2541956	2539957	278443	276501	SPAC139.03	SPBC1703.05	toe2	rio2	SPAC139.03	SPBC1703.05	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435629	2541956	2540130	278443	276667	SPAC139.03	SPBC17A3.05c	toe2	SPBC17A3.05c	SPAC139.03	pi041	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435630	2542454	2541585	278915	278082	SPAC1399.01c	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC1399.01c	man1	-	heh2|mug61	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435631	2542614	2542614	279068	279068	SPAC1399.04c	SPAC1399.04c	SPAC1399.04c	SPAC1399.04c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435632	2542614	2539928	279068	276472	SPAC1399.04c	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC1399.04c	imp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435633	2542546	2542546	279003	279003	SPAC1399.05c	SPAC1399.05c	toe1	toe1	SPAC1399.05c	SPAC1399.05c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435634	2542546	3361487	279003	280563	SPAC1399.05c	SPAC1805.17	toe1	crm1	SPAC1399.05c	SPAC1B2.01|caf2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435635	2542546	2542452	279003	278913	SPAC1399.05c	SPAC1D4.02c	toe1	SPAC1D4.02c	SPAC1399.05c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435636	2542546	2541601	279003	278098	SPAC1399.05c	SPAC22F8.08	toe1	sec24	SPAC1399.05c	sfb2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435637	2542546	2541593	279003	278090	SPAC1399.05c	SPAC25B8.04c	toe1	mss51	SPAC1399.05c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435638	2542546	2543517	279003	279935	SPAC1399.05c	SPAC3G9.05	toe1	spa2	SPAC1399.05c	SPAC3G9.05	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435639	2542546	2541456	279003	277959	SPAC1399.05c	SPAC6G9.04	toe1	spo7	SPAC1399.05c	mug79	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435640	2542546	2541735	279003	278229	SPAC1399.05c	SPAC7D4.04	toe1	atg11	SPAC1399.05c	taf1|cvt9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435641	2542546	2539838	279003	276387	SPAC1399.05c	SPBC1347.10	toe1	cdc23	SPAC1399.05c	mcm10	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435642	2542546	2540727	279003	277250	SPAC1399.05c	SPBC1921.03c	toe1	mex67	SPAC1399.05c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435643	2542546	2540234	279003	276766	SPAC1399.05c	SPBC336.12c	toe1	cdc10	SPAC1399.05c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435644	2542546	2539096	279003	275668	SPAC1399.05c	SPCC74.01	toe1	sly1	SPAC1399.05c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435645	2542546	2539107	279003	275679	SPAC1399.05c	SPCC965.12	toe1	SPCC965.12	SPAC1399.05c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435646	2542130	2542130	278606	278606	SPAC13A11.05	SPAC13A11.05	ysp2	ysp2	SPAC13A11.05|yspII	SPAC13A11.05|yspII	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435647	2542130	2539928	278606	276472	SPAC13A11.05	SPBC1604.08c	ysp2	imp1	SPAC13A11.05|yspII	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435648	3361518	2542410	280594	278874	SPAC13C5.01c	SPAC1834.11c	pre9	sec18	SPAC13C5.01c|SPAC31A2.17c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435649	3361518	2542042	280594	278523	SPAC13C5.01c	SPAC23A1.14c	pre9	SPAC23A1.14c	SPAC13C5.01c|SPAC31A2.17c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435650	3361518	2543157	280594	279588	SPAC13C5.01c	SPAC3F10.12c	pre9	SPAC3F10.12c	SPAC13C5.01c|SPAC31A2.17c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435651	3361518	2541735	280594	278229	SPAC13C5.01c	SPAC7D4.04	pre9	atg11	SPAC13C5.01c|SPAC31A2.17c	taf1|cvt9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435652	3361518	2543646	280594	280060	SPAC13C5.01c	SPAC821.07c	pre9	moc3	SPAC13C5.01c|SPAC31A2.17c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435653	3361518	2543290	280594	279715	SPAC13C5.01c	SPAC9E9.10c	pre9	cbh1	SPAC13C5.01c|SPAC31A2.17c	cbh	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435654	3361518	2540725	280594	277248	SPAC13C5.01c	SPBC215.14c	pre9	vps20	SPAC13C5.01c|SPAC31A2.17c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435655	3361518	2540931	280594	277447	SPAC13C5.01c	SPBC365.07c	pre9	SPBC365.07c	SPAC13C5.01c|SPAC31A2.17c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435656	3361518	2538843	280594	275424	SPAC13C5.01c	SPCC162.08c	pre9	nup211	SPAC13C5.01c|SPAC31A2.17c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435657	2542176	2541616	278651	278113	SPAC13C5.02	SPAC2F3.14c	dre4	saf2	hgp1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435658	2542176	2539395	278651	275960	SPAC13C5.02	SPCC663.11	dre4	saf1	hgp1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435659	2542320	2539943	278786	276487	SPAC13C5.05c	SPBC14F5.05c	SPAC13C5.05c	sam1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435660	2542757	2542757	279207	279207	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC13C5.07	mre11	mre11	rad32	rad32	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435661	2542757	2543500	279207	279918	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC926.08c	mre11	SPAC926.08c	rad32	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435662	2542757	2539837	279207	276386	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC17G9.12c	mre11	SPBC17G9.12c	rad32	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435663	2542757	2539360	279207	275926	SPAC13C5.07	SPCC613.04c	mre11	rng3	rad32	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435664	2542872	2542872	279317	279317	SPAC13D6.04c	SPAC13D6.04c	btb3	btb3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435665	2542822	2539360	279269	275926	SPAC13F5.02c	SPCC613.04c	ptr6	rng3	taf7	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435666	2542822	2538818	279269	275399	SPAC13F5.02c	SPCC645.12c	ptr6	SPCC645.12c	taf7	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435667	3361391	2538720	280467	275304	SPAC13G6.01c	SPCC338.05c	rad8	mms2	SPAC5H10.14c	spm2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435668	2542875	2540288	279320	276819	SPAC13G7.02c	SPBC3B9.01	ssa1	fes1	-	SPBC3B9.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435669	2542908	2542908	279352	279352	SPAC13G7.03	SPAC13G7.03	upf3	upf3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435670	2542839	2542839	279285	279285	SPAC13G7.12c	SPAC13G7.12c	SPAC13G7.12c	SPAC13G7.12c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435671	2542839	2539538	279285	276100	SPAC13G7.12c	SPCC364.06	SPAC13G7.12c	nap1	-	nap11	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435672	2542862	2540735	279308	277258	SPAC140.03	SPBC83.03c	arb1	tas3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435673	2542865	2540409	279310	276937	SPAC144.01	SPBC2D10.11c	SPAC144.01	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435674	2542855	2542855	279301	279301	SPAC144.04c	SPAC144.04c	spe1	spe1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435675	2542855	2541945	279301	278432	SPAC144.04c	SPAC23C4.06c	spe1	SPAC23C4.06c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435676	2542899	2539916	279343	276460	SPAC144.07c	SPBC11G11.07	gpn2	mtr10	SPAC144.07c	SPBC18H10.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435677	2542899	2539351	279343	275917	SPAC144.07c	SPCC1840.11	gpn2	csl4	SPAC144.07c	SPCC965.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435678	2542824	2542824	279271	279271	SPAC144.13c	SPAC144.13c	srw1	srw1	ste9	ste9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435679	2542824	2540880	279271	277397	SPAC144.13c	SPBC582.03	srw1	cdc13	ste9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435680	2542884	2542884	279329	279329	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC1486.02c	dsc2	dsc2	ucp14	ucp14	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435681	2542910	2542263	279353	278732	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC17A2.08c	SPAC1486.03c	ntr2	-	SPAC17A2.08c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435682	2542910	2541735	279353	278229	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC7D4.04	SPAC1486.03c	atg11	-	taf1|cvt9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435683	2542910	2540691	279353	277216	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC20F10.05	SPAC1486.03c	nrl1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435684	2542883	2542883	279328	279328	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC1486.04c	alm1	alm1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435685	2541581	2541941	278078	278428	SPAC1486.10	SPAC20H4.03c	thi1	tfs1	SPAC6G10.01|ntf1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435686	2541581	2543517	278078	279935	SPAC1486.10	SPAC3G9.05	thi1	spa2	SPAC6G10.01|ntf1	SPAC3G9.05	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435687	2541581	2542091	278078	278568	SPAC1486.10	SPAC7D4.02c	thi1	sfp47	SPAC6G10.01|ntf1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435688	2542101	2541585	278577	278082	SPAC14C4.04	SPAC14C4.05c	B22918-2	man1	-	heh2|mug61	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435689	2542101	2542733	278577	279183	SPAC14C4.04	SPAC6F12.04	B22918-2	SPAC6F12.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435690	2542101	2540903	278577	277419	SPAC14C4.04	SPBC530.05	B22918-2	prt1	-	SPBC530.05	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435691	2541585	2542754	278082	279204	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC1687.02	man1	SPAC1687.02	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435692	2541585	2542352	278082	278817	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC1782.02c	man1	SPAC1782.02c	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435693	2541585	2542396	278082	278860	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC17G6.09	man1	sec62	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435694	2541585	2542385	278082	278849	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC1805.02c	man1	etf2	heh2|mug61	SPAC1805.02c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435695	2541585	2542491	278082	278950	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC186.03	man1	SPAC186.03	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435696	2541585	2542544	278082	279001	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC18G6.10	man1	lem2	heh2|mug61	heh1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435697	2541585	2542521	278082	278979	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC18G6.12c	man1	SPAC18G6.12c	heh2|mug61	B22918-1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435698	2541585	2542280	278082	278748	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC1A6.06c	man1	meu31	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435699	2541585	2542464	278082	278925	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC1A6.09c	man1	lag1	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435700	2541585	2542518	278082	278976	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC1B3.16c	man1	vht1	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435701	2541585	2541941	278082	278428	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC20H4.03c	man1	tfs1	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435702	2541585	2541911	278082	278401	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC212.04c	man1	SPAC212.04c	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435703	2541585	9407191	278082	1028554	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC227.19c	man1	SPAC227.19c	heh2|mug61	SPNCRNA.85	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435704	2541585	2541829	278082	278320	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC22A12.10	man1	SPAC22A12.10	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435705	2541585	2541774	278082	278268	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC22E12.05c	man1	rer1	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435706	2541585	2541748	278082	278242	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC22E12.06c	man1	gmh3	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435707	2541585	2541895	278082	278385	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC22F8.04	man1	pet1	heh2|mug61	SPAC22F8.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435708	2541585	2541744	278082	278238	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC23A1.02c	man1	SPAC23A1.02c	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435709	2541585	2541988	278082	278472	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC23A1.05	man1	SPAC23A1.05	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435710	2541585	2541897	278082	278387	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC23H4.18c	man1	rbx1	heh2|mug61	pip1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435711	2541585	2542667	278082	279120	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC26A3.16	man1	dph1	heh2|mug61	ucp5	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435712	2541585	2541842	278082	278333	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC27E2.11c	man1	SPAC27E2.11c	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435713	2541585	2542283	278082	278751	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC27F1.08	man1	pdt1	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435714	2541585	2541621	278082	278118	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC29A4.17c	man1	SPAC29A4.17c	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435715	2541585	2543206	278082	279635	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC328.07c	man1	SPAC328.07c	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435716	2541585	2543109	278082	279541	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC3G6.09c	man1	tps2	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435717	2541585	2543440	278082	279860	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC3H1.13	man1	ppk13	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435718	2541585	2543590	278082	280005	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC4C5.03	man1	SPAC4C5.03	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435719	2541585	2543252	278082	279680	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC4F10.10c	man1	mnn9	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435720	2541585	2542969	278082	279409	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC4G8.10	man1	gos1	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435721	2541585	2543598	278082	280013	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC4G9.14	man1	SPAC4G9.14	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435722	2541585	2543331	278082	279754	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC56E4.07	man1	SPAC56E4.07	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435723	2541585	2543225	278082	279653	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC56F8.07	man1	SPAC56F8.07	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435724	2541585	2542018	278082	278501	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC5H10.11	man1	gmh1	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435725	2541585	2542227	278082	278700	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC5H10.13c	man1	gmh2	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435726	2541585	2543158	278082	279589	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC607.07c	man1	SPAC607.07c	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435727	2541585	2543431	278082	279851	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC630.04c	man1	SPAC630.04c	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435728	2541585	2543340	278082	279763	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC637.03	man1	SPAC637.03	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435729	2541585	2543575	278082	279990	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC644.13c	man1	SPAC644.13c	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435730	2541585	2543479	278082	279899	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC688.04c	man1	gst3	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435731	2541585	2542946	278082	279386	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC6F12.03c	man1	fsv1	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435732	2541585	2542733	278082	279183	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC6F12.04	man1	SPAC6F12.04	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435733	2541585	2542110	278082	278586	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC6F6.05	man1	ost2	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435734	2541585	2541731	278082	278225	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC6G9.11	man1	syb1	heh2|mug61	snc1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435735	2541585	2541780	278082	278273	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC732.01	man1	vma11	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435736	2541585	2541646	278082	278142	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC750.06c	man1	SPAC750.06c	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435737	2541585	2541834	278082	278325	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC824.08	man1	gda1	heh2|mug61	gdp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435738	2541585	2543502	278082	279920	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC890.06	man1	nup155	heh2|mug61	nup157|nup170	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435739	2541585	2542702	278082	279155	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC8E11.01c	man1	SPAC8E11.01c	heh2|mug61	SPAC959.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435740	2541585	2543508	278082	279926	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC8F11.10c	man1	pvg1	heh2|mug61	SPACUNK4.18	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435741	2541585	2542415	278082	278879	SPAC14C4.05c	SPACUNK4.08	man1	SPACUNK4.08	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435742	2541585	2541802	278082	278293	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAP14E8.05c	man1	SPAP14E8.05c	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435743	2541585	2542636	278082	279090	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAP27G11.13c	man1	nop10	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435744	2541585	3361429	278082	280505	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAPB18E9.01	man1	trm5	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435745	2541585	2543369	278082	279791	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAPB1A10.07c	man1	SPAPB1A10.07c	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435746	2541585	2540054	278082	276592	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC119.09c	man1	SPBC119.09c	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435747	2541585	2539955	278082	276499	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC119.16c	man1	SPBC119.16c	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435748	2541585	2540001	278082	276545	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC1289.13c	man1	gmh6	heh2|mug61	SPBC1289.13c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435749	2541585	2539914	278082	276458	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC12D12.01	man1	sad1	heh2|mug61	SPBC16H5.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435750	2541585	2543090	278082	279523	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC1348.01	man1	SPBC1348.01	heh2|mug61	SPAC1348.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435751	2541585	2543136	278082	279568	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC1348.07	man1	SPBC1348.07	heh2|mug61	SPAC1348.07	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435752	2541585	2539721	278082	276274	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC146.04	man1	SPBC146.04	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435753	2541585	2539926	278082	276470	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC14F5.13c	man1	pho8	heh2|mug61	SPBC14F5.13c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435754	2541585	2539903	278082	276449	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC15C4.04c	man1	SPBC15C4.04c	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435755	2541585	2539795	278082	276345	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC15D4.04	man1	gpt2	heh2|mug61	alg7|gpt	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435756	2541585	9406967	278082	1028330	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC1604.25	man1	pet117	heh2|mug61	SPNG1899|SPNCRNA.430	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435757	2541585	2539895	278082	276441	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC1683.10c	man1	pcl1	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435758	2541585	2540039	278082	276579	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC16A3.02c	man1	SPBC16A3.02c	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435759	2541585	2539904	278082	276450	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC16H5.09c	man1	omh2	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435760	2541585	2539685	278082	276240	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC1734.04	man1	anp1	heh2|mug61	SPBC337.20	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435761	2541585	2539611	278082	276169	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC1734.09	man1	yea4	heh2|mug61	SPBC1734.09	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435762	2541585	2540809	278082	277328	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC18A7.01	man1	SPBC18A7.01	heh2|mug61	SPBC4F6.19c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435763	2541585	2540834	278082	277352	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC18H10.18c	man1	SPBC18H10.18c	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435764	2541585	2540827	278082	277345	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC1921.06c	man1	pvg3	heh2|mug61	mug49	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435765	2541585	2540685	278082	277210	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC19C2.15c	man1	SPBC19C2.15c	heh2|mug61	SPBC2F12.16	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435766	2541585	2540706	278082	277229	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC19C7.12c	man1	omh1	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435767	2541585	2540734	278082	277257	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC19G7.09	man1	ulp1	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435768	2541585	2540729	278082	277252	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC215.08c	man1	arg4	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435769	2541585	2540356	278082	276885	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC25H2.06c	man1	hrf1	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435770	2541585	2540429	278082	276957	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC29A10.07	man1	pom152	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435771	2541585	2540399	278082	276927	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC2A9.06c	man1	nus1	heh2|mug61	SPBC2A9.06c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435772	2541585	2540282	278082	276813	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC2G2.03c	man1	sbh1	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435773	2541585	2540281	278082	276812	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC2G2.14	man1	csi1	heh2|mug61	SPBC2G2.14	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435774	2541585	2540289	278082	276820	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC31E1.04	man1	pep12	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435775	2541585	2540256	278082	276787	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC32F12.12c	man1	SPBC32F12.12c	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435776	2541585	2540264	278082	276795	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC32H8.03	man1	bem46	heh2|mug61	SPACTOKYO_453.15c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435777	2541585	2541037	278082	277552	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC354.02c	man1	sec61	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435778	2541585	2540944	278082	277460	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC365.02c	man1	cox10	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435779	2541585	2540959	278082	277475	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC365.12c	man1	ish1	heh2|mug61	isp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435780	2541585	2540973	278082	277489	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC36B7.07	man1	tlg1	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435781	2541585	2540266	278082	276797	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC3B8.06	man1	SPBC3B8.06	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435782	2541585	2540970	278082	277486	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC3B9.10	man1	vti1	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435783	2541585	2540998	278082	277514	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC3D6.05	man1	ptp4	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435784	2541585	2540846	278082	277363	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC428.14	man1	SPBC428.14	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435785	2541585	2541082	278082	277597	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC577.11	man1	SPBC577.11	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435786	2541585	2540880	278082	277397	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC582.03	man1	cdc13	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435787	2541585	2541110	278082	277625	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC646.05c	man1	erg9	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435788	2541585	2541177	278082	277691	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC725.05c	man1	SPBC725.05c	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435789	2541585	2541206	278082	277720	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC839.11c	man1	hut1	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435790	2541585	2541244	278082	277758	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC8D2.02c	man1	vps68	heh2|mug61	SPBC8D2.02c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435791	2541585	2541386	278082	277897	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBP8B7.24c	man1	atg8	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435792	2541585	2541395	278082	277904	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBP8B7.25	man1	cyp4	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435793	2541585	3361178	278082	280254	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBPB21E7.04c	man1	SPBPB21E7.04c	heh2|mug61	SPAPB21E7.04c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435794	2541585	3361186	278082	280262	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBPB8B6.06c	man1	SPBPB8B6.06c	heh2|mug61	SPAP8B6.06c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435795	2541585	2538844	278082	275425	SPAC14C4.05c	SPCC1183.09c	man1	pmp31	heh2|mug61	mug75	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435796	2541585	2539075	278082	275647	SPAC14C4.05c	SPCC1281.03c	man1	emc4	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435797	2541585	2538911	278082	275488	SPAC14C4.05c	SPCC1442.12	man1	pps1	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435798	2541585	2539000	278082	275574	SPAC14C4.05c	SPCC1450.06c	man1	grx3	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435799	2541585	2538772	278082	275355	SPAC14C4.05c	SPCC16A11.10c	man1	oca8	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435800	2541585	2539175	278082	275746	SPAC14C4.05c	SPCC16C4.01	man1	sif2	heh2|mug61	SPCC5E4.09	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435801	2541585	2539393	278082	275958	SPAC14C4.05c	SPCC1795.02c	man1	vcx1	heh2|mug61	SPCC895.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435802	2541585	2539124	278082	275696	SPAC14C4.05c	SPCC1795.12c	man1	SPCC1795.12c	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435803	2541585	2538812	278082	275393	SPAC14C4.05c	SPCC622.11	man1	SPCC622.11	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435804	2541585	2538793	278082	275374	SPAC14C4.05c	SPCC63.10c	man1	sec59	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435805	2541585	2539101	278082	275673	SPAC14C4.05c	SPCC736.04c	man1	gma12	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435806	2541585	2539185	278082	275756	SPAC14C4.05c	SPCC737.03c	man1	ima1	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435807	2541585	2539377	278082	275943	SPAC14C4.05c	SPCC825.03c	man1	psy1	heh2|mug61	sso1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435808	2541585	2539516	278082	276078	SPAC14C4.05c	SPCC970.06	man1	SPCC970.06	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435809	2541585	2538854	278082	275435	SPAC14C4.05c	SPCP1E11.05c	man1	are2	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435810	2541585	2538782	278082	275363	SPAC14C4.05c	SPCPJ732.03	man1	meu15	heh2|mug61	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435811	2541466	2541505	277968	278007	SPAC14C4.06c	SPAC57A7.04c	nab2	pabp	SPAC14C4.06c	pab1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435812	2541466	2539733	277968	276285	SPAC14C4.06c	SPBC16E9.12c	nab2	pab2	SPAC14C4.06c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435813	2541650	2542619	278146	279073	SPAC14C4.12c	SPAC6G10.02c	laf1	tea3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435814	2541650	2539631	278146	276187	SPAC14C4.12c	SPBC16G5.16	laf1	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435815	2541611	2541611	278108	278108	SPAC1527.02	SPAC1527.02	sft2	sft2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435816	2541551	2541551	278050	278050	SPAC1556.04c	SPAC1556.04c	cdd1	cdd1	pcd1	pcd1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435817	2541551	2541941	278050	278428	SPAC1556.04c	SPAC20H4.03c	cdd1	tfs1	pcd1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435818	2541551	2542094	278050	278571	SPAC1556.04c	SPAC29B12.06c	cdd1	rcd1	pcd1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435819	2541551	2543106	278050	279538	SPAC1556.04c	SPAC3A11.13	cdd1	SPAC3A11.13	pcd1	SPAC3H5.02	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435820	2541551	2543517	278050	279935	SPAC1556.04c	SPAC3G9.05	cdd1	spa2	pcd1	SPAC3G9.05	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435821	2541551	2539928	278050	276472	SPAC1556.04c	SPBC1604.08c	cdd1	imp1	pcd1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435822	2541551	2539687	278050	276242	SPAC1556.04c	SPBC1711.05	cdd1	SPBC1711.05	pcd1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435823	2541674	2541674	278170	278170	SPAC1556.07	SPAC1556.07	pmm1	pmm1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435824	2541677	2540612	278173	277138	SPAC1565.04c	SPBC1D7.05	ste4	byr2	-	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435825	2542761	2541936	279211	278423	SPAC1565.06c	SPAC222.10c	spg1	byr4	sid3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435826	2542761	2541852	279211	278343	SPAC1565.06c	SPAC23H3.09c	spg1	gly1	sid3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435827	2542761	2542096	279211	278572	SPAC1565.06c	SPAC26H5.02c	spg1	SPAC26H5.02c	sid3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435828	2542761	2543377	279211	279799	SPAC1565.06c	SPAC3H1.07	spg1	aru1	sid3	car3	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435829	2542761	2543055	279211	279489	SPAC1565.06c	SPAC806.06c	spg1	SPAC806.06c	sid3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435830	2542761	2543646	279211	280060	SPAC1565.06c	SPAC821.07c	spg1	moc3	sid3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435831	2542761	2542106	279211	278582	SPAC1565.06c	SPAC8E11.03c	spg1	dmc1	sid3	dmp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435832	2542761	2539914	279211	276458	SPAC1565.06c	SPBC12D12.01	spg1	sad1	sid3	SPBC16H5.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435833	2542761	2539956	279211	276500	SPAC1565.06c	SPBC16E9.11c	spg1	pub3	sid3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435834	2542761	2539631	279211	276187	SPAC1565.06c	SPBC16G5.16	spg1	SPBC16G5.16	sid3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435835	2542761	2540660	279211	277185	SPAC1565.06c	SPBC21.06c	spg1	cdc7	sid3	its10|pld1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435836	2542761	2540409	279211	276937	SPAC1565.06c	SPBC2D10.11c	spg1	nap2	sid3	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435837	2542761	2541373	279211	277884	SPAC1565.06c	SPBP8B7.18c	spg1	SPBP8B7.18c	sid3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435838	2542761	2539149	279211	275721	SPAC1565.06c	SPCC1739.11c	spg1	cdc11	sid3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435839	2542761	2538967	279211	275541	SPAC1565.06c	SPCC330.04c	spg1	mug135	sid3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435840	2542761	2539349	279211	275915	SPAC1565.06c	SPCC613.11c	spg1	meu23	sid3	B13958-2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435841	2542785	2540778	279234	277297	SPAC15A10.02	SPBC19G7.10c	taf12	SPBC19G7.10c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435842	2542749	2543580	279199	279995	SPAC15A10.03c	SPAC644.14c	rad54	rad51	rhp54	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435843	2542749	2543032	279199	279468	SPAC15A10.03c	SPAC6F12.05c	rad54	tnr3	rhp54	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435844	2542788	2542788	279237	279237	SPAC15A10.15	SPAC15A10.15	sgo2	sgo2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435845	2542756	2540124	279206	276661	SPAC15A10.16	SPBC16E9.15	bud6	SPBC16E9.15	SPAC15E1.01|aip3|fat1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435846	2542789	2540409	279238	276937	SPAC15E1.03	SPBC2D10.11c	rpl42	nap2	rpl36a	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435847	2542801	2542801	279249	279249	SPAC15E1.04	SPAC15E1.04	hal3	hal3	SPAC15E1.04	SPAC15E1.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435848	2542801	2541941	279249	278428	SPAC15E1.04	SPAC20H4.03c	hal3	tfs1	SPAC15E1.04	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435849	2542801	2543221	279249	279649	SPAC15E1.04	SPAC637.04	hal3	SPAC637.04	SPAC15E1.04	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435850	2542801	2540462	279249	276990	SPAC15E1.04	SPBC29A3.07c	hal3	sap14	SPAC15E1.04	sab14|SF3b14a	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435851	2542801	2540430	279249	276958	SPAC15E1.04	SPBC25B2.01	hal3	SPBC25B2.01	SPAC15E1.04	SPBC2G5.08	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435852	2541682	2540139	278178	276676	SPAC15F9.02	SPBC1773.06c	seh1	adh8	-	SPBC1773.06c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435853	2541682	2539829	278178	276378	SPAC15F9.02	SPBC17G9.04c	seh1	nup85	-	ptr5	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435854	2542772	2542772	279221	279221	SPAC16.02c	SPAC16.02c	srp2	srp2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435855	2542772	2539818	279221	276368	SPAC16.02c	SPBC11C11.08	srp2	srp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435856	2542772	2540462	279221	276990	SPAC16.02c	SPBC29A3.07c	srp2	sap14	-	sab14|SF3b14a	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435857	2542772	2539847	279221	276395	SPAC16.02c	SPBC530.14c	srp2	dsk1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435858	2542772	2539459	279221	276022	SPAC16.02c	SPCC825.05c	srp2	pwi1	-	SPCC825.05c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435859	2542806	2542690	279254	279143	SPAC1610.01	SPAC27D7.07c	saf5	smd1	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435860	2542806	2540884	279254	277401	SPAC1610.01	SPBC19C2.14	saf5	smd3	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435861	3361541	2539495	280617	276058	SPAC167.05	SPCC4F11.02	SPAC167.05	ptc1	SPAC57A7.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435862	2542782	2540409	279231	276937	SPAC1687.06c	SPBC2D10.11c	rpl44	nap2	rpl28	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435863	2542784	2542877	279233	279322	SPAC1687.07	SPAC13G6.15c	SPAC1687.07	SPAC13G6.15c	-	SPAC24B11.04c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435864	2542755	2542452	279205	278913	SPAC1687.10	SPAC1D4.02c	mcp1	SPAC1D4.02c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435865	2542755	3361526	279205	280602	SPAC1687.10	SPAC664.15	mcp1	caf4	-	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435866	2542755	2542619	279205	279073	SPAC1687.10	SPAC6G10.02c	mcp1	tea3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435867	2542755	2539631	279205	276187	SPAC1687.10	SPBC16G5.16	mcp1	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435868	2541529	2541529	278029	278029	SPAC1687.13c	SPAC1687.13c	csn5	csn5	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435869	2542379	2542379	278843	278843	SPAC1687.17c	SPAC1687.17c	SPAC1687.17c	SPAC1687.17c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435870	2542311	2542489	278777	278948	SPAC16A10.05c	SPAC589.08c	dad1	dam1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435871	2542316	2542316	278782	278782	SPAC16C9.02c	SPAC16C9.02c	SPAC16C9.02c	SPAC16C9.02c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435872	2542316	2541941	278782	278428	SPAC16C9.02c	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC16C9.02c	tfs1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435873	2542316	2543517	278782	279935	SPAC16C9.02c	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC16C9.02c	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435874	2542316	2539928	278782	276472	SPAC16C9.02c	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC16C9.02c	imp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435875	2542319	3361526	278785	280602	SPAC16C9.03	SPAC664.15	nmd3	caf4	-	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435876	2542337	2539631	278803	276187	SPAC16E8.09	SPBC16G5.16	scd1	SPBC16G5.16	ral1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435877	2541706	2539216	278201	275786	SPAC16E8.15	SPCC14G10.04	tif45	SPCC14G10.04	tif1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435878	2542339	2542452	278805	278913	SPAC16E8.16	SPAC1D4.02c	sua7	SPAC1D4.02c	SPAC16E8.16	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435879	2542352	3361269	278817	280345	SPAC1782.02c	SPBC31A8.01c	SPAC1782.02c	rtn1	-	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435880	2542359	2542359	278824	278824	SPAC1782.11	SPAC1782.11	met14	met14	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435881	2542370	2540409	278834	276937	SPAC1783.08c	SPBC2D10.11c	rpl1502	nap2	rpl15-2	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435882	2542451	2542654	278912	279108	SPAC1786.04	SPAC8E11.05c	SPAC1786.04	SPAC8E11.05c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435883	2542172	2542472	278647	278933	SPAC17A2.04c	SPAC9E9.13	cns1	wos2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435884	2542151	3361526	278627	280602	SPAC17A2.09c	SPAC664.15	csx1	caf4	-	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435885	2542252	2542252	278722	278722	SPAC17A2.13c	SPAC17A2.13c	rad25	rad25	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435886	2542265	2540409	278734	276937	SPAC17A5.03	SPBC2D10.11c	rpl301	nap2	rpl3|rpl3-1	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435887	2542444	3361526	278906	280602	SPAC17A5.05c	SPAC664.15	SPAC17A5.05c	caf4	-	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435888	2542444	2542619	278906	279073	SPAC17A5.05c	SPAC6G10.02c	SPAC17A5.05c	tea3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435889	2542444	2539631	278906	276187	SPAC17A5.05c	SPBC16G5.16	SPAC17A5.05c	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435890	2542444	2539423	278906	275988	SPAC17A5.05c	SPCC663.12	SPAC17A5.05c	cid12	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435891	2542245	2542245	278715	278715	SPAC17A5.10	SPAC17A5.10	SPAC17A5.10	SPAC17A5.10	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435892	2542245	2543208	278715	279637	SPAC17A5.10	SPAC328.04	SPAC17A5.10	SPAC328.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435893	2542245	2542059	278715	278537	SPAC17A5.10	SPAC328.06	SPAC17A5.10	ubp2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435894	2542245	2543646	278715	280060	SPAC17A5.10	SPAC821.07c	SPAC17A5.10	moc3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435895	2542245	2539956	278715	276500	SPAC17A5.10	SPBC16E9.11c	SPAC17A5.10	pub3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435896	2542245	2539686	278715	276241	SPAC17A5.10	SPBC1734.06	SPAC17A5.10	rhp18	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435897	2542245	2540306	278715	276836	SPAC17A5.10	SPBC2G5.02c	SPAC17A5.10	ckb2	-	SPBC2G5.02c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435898	2542245	2540350	278715	276879	SPAC17A5.10	SPBC317.01	SPAC17A5.10	mbx2	-	pvg4	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435899	2542245	2541131	278715	277646	SPAC17A5.10	SPBC713.02c	SPAC17A5.10	ubp15	-	ubp21|ubpD	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435900	2542191	2542059	278666	278537	SPAC17A5.12	SPAC328.06	ucp7	ubp2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435901	2542406	2543366	278870	279788	SPAC17A5.13	SPAC4H3.08	SPAC17A5.13	SPAC4H3.08	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435902	2542438	2543157	278900	279588	SPAC17C9.01c	SPAC3F10.12c	nuc2	SPAC3F10.12c	SPAC1851.01|apc3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435903	2542186	2543046	278661	279481	SPAC17C9.14	SPAC3C7.10	SPAC17C9.14	pex13	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435904	5802962	2540561	858100	277088	SPAC17D4.01	SPBC28F2.05c	pex7	SPBC28F2.05c	SPAC1834.12|SPAP17D4.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435905	2542250	2540150	278720	276687	SPAC17D4.03c	SPBC16E9.14c	cis4	zrg17	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435906	2542380	2543143	278844	279575	SPAC17G6.04c	SPAPB1A10.04c	cpp1	cwp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput|Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435907	2542423	2541485	278885	277987	SPAC17G6.08	SPAC2G11.03c	pep7	vps45	vac1	vas1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435908	2542396	2539966	278860	276510	SPAC17G6.09	SPBC11B10.06	sec62	sws1	-	pi005|SPACTOKYO_453.32	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435909	2542396	2539914	278860	276458	SPAC17G6.09	SPBC12D12.01	sec62	sad1	-	SPBC16H5.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435910	2542400	3361526	278864	280602	SPAC17G6.10	SPAC664.15	ssr1	caf4	-	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435911	2542400	2542427	278864	278889	SPAC17G6.10	SPAC6F6.12	ssr1	SPAC6F6.12	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435912	2542443	2542443	278905	278905	SPAC17G6.13	SPAC17G6.13	slt1	slt1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435913	2542443	2541713	278905	278208	SPAC17G6.13	SPAC3A12.12	slt1	atp11	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435914	2542443	2543409	278905	279831	SPAC17G6.13	SPAC4D7.13	slt1	usp104	-	prp40	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435915	2542443	3361526	278905	280602	SPAC17G6.13	SPAC664.15	slt1	caf4	-	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435916	2542443	2541456	278905	277959	SPAC17G6.13	SPAC6G9.04	slt1	spo7	-	mug79	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435917	2542443	2539631	278905	276187	SPAC17G6.13	SPBC16G5.16	slt1	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435918	2542443	2540892	278905	277408	SPAC17G6.13	SPBC530.01	slt1	gyp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435919	2542443	2540903	278905	277419	SPAC17G6.13	SPBC530.05	slt1	prt1	-	SPBC530.05	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435920	2542443	2541362	278905	277873	SPAC17G6.13	SPBP8B7.05c	slt1	nce103	-	SPBP8B7.05c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435921	2542443	2539360	278905	275926	SPAC17G6.13	SPCC613.04c	slt1	rng3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435922	2542443	2539002	278905	275576	SPAC17G6.13	SPCC830.07c	slt1	psi1	-	psi	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435923	2542433	2542433	278895	278895	SPAC17G6.14c	SPAC17G6.14c	uap56	uap56	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435924	2542433	2541593	278895	278090	SPAC17G6.14c	SPAC25B8.04c	uap56	mss51	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435925	2542433	2538932	278895	275508	SPAC17G6.14c	SPCC31H12.03c	uap56	tho1	-	SPCC31H12.03c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435926	2542154	2542154	278630	278630	SPAC17G8.02	SPAC17G8.02	SPAC17G8.02	SPAC17G8.02	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435927	2542154	2542452	278630	278913	SPAC17G8.02	SPAC1D4.02c	SPAC17G8.02	SPAC1D4.02c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435928	2542154	2541941	278630	278428	SPAC17G8.02	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC17G8.02	tfs1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435929	2542154	2542455	278630	278916	SPAC17G8.02	SPAC2C4.04c	SPAC17G8.02	SPAC2C4.04c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435930	2542154	2542474	278630	278934	SPAC17G8.02	SPAC31G5.09c	SPAC17G8.02	spk1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435931	2542154	2541456	278630	277959	SPAC17G8.02	SPAC6G9.04	SPAC17G8.02	spo7	-	mug79	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435932	2542154	2539883	278630	276429	SPAC17G8.02	SPBC1709.19c	SPAC17G8.02	nfu1	-	SPBC1709.19c|SPBC409.02c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435933	2542154	2539650	278630	276205	SPAC17G8.02	SPBC1711.13	SPAC17G8.02	his2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435934	2542154	2540394	278630	276922	SPAC17G8.02	SPBC2D10.09	SPAC17G8.02	snr1	-	SPBC2D10.09	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435935	2542154	2541281	278630	277794	SPAC17G8.02	SPBC902.04	SPAC17G8.02	rmn1	-	SPBC902.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435936	2542201	2540406	278676	276934	SPAC17G8.03c	SPBC30D10.02	dpb3	SPBC30D10.02	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435937	2542275	2541767	278744	278261	SPAC17G8.04c	SPAC6G9.07c	arc5	arc4	arc15	arp10	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435938	2542278	2542412	278747	278876	SPAC17G8.07	SPAC9G1.13c	yaf9	swc4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435939	2542278	2538967	278747	275541	SPAC17G8.07	SPCC330.04c	yaf9	mug135	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435940	2542409	2541652	278873	278148	SPAC17G8.10c	SPAC24B11.06c	dma1	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435941	2542409	2543157	278873	279588	SPAC17G8.10c	SPAC3F10.12c	dma1	SPAC3F10.12c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435942	2542409	2543554	278873	279971	SPAC17G8.10c	SPAC4H3.11c	dma1	ppc89	-	mug127	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435943	2542409	2543580	278873	279995	SPAC17G8.10c	SPAC644.14c	dma1	rad51	-	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435944	2542409	3361526	278873	280602	SPAC17G8.10c	SPAC664.15	dma1	caf4	-	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435945	2542409	2542733	278873	279183	SPAC17G8.10c	SPAC6F12.04	dma1	SPAC6F12.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435946	2542409	2539914	278873	276458	SPAC17G8.10c	SPBC12D12.01	dma1	sad1	-	SPBC16H5.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435947	2542409	2539726	278873	276278	SPAC17G8.10c	SPBC13E7.08c	dma1	leo1	-	SPBC13E7.08c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435948	2542409	2539717	278873	276270	SPAC17G8.10c	SPBC15D4.08c	dma1	SPBC15D4.08c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435949	2542409	2540324	278873	276854	SPAC17G8.10c	SPBC29A3.16	dma1	rrs1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435950	2542409	2540350	278873	276879	SPAC17G8.10c	SPBC317.01	dma1	mbx2	-	pvg4	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435951	2542409	2540537	278873	277064	SPAC17G8.10c	SPBC56F2.07c	dma1	SPBC56F2.07c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435952	2542409	2541287	278873	277800	SPAC17G8.10c	SPBP22H7.05c	dma1	abo2	-	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435953	2542253	2542567	278723	279023	SPAC17H9.04c	SPAC328.05	SPAC17H9.04c	SPAC328.05	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435954	2542253	2543646	278723	280060	SPAC17H9.04c	SPAC821.07c	SPAC17H9.04c	moc3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435955	2542253	2539631	278723	276187	SPAC17H9.04c	SPBC16G5.16	SPAC17H9.04c	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435956	2542253	2539841	278723	276389	SPAC17H9.04c	SPBC17D1.05	SPAC17H9.04c	SPBC17D1.05	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435957	2542253	2540133	278723	276670	SPAC17H9.04c	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC17H9.04c	php5	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435958	2542253	2539349	278723	275915	SPAC17H9.04c	SPCC613.11c	SPAC17H9.04c	meu23	-	B13958-2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435959	2542285	2540440	278753	276968	SPAC17H9.09c	SPBC646.12c	ras1	gap1	ste5	sar1|src1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435960	2542259	2541513	278728	278014	SPAC17H9.11	SPAC227.13c	gmf1	isu1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435961	2542259	2541476	278728	277978	SPAC17H9.11	SPAC2E1P5.05	gmf1	rrp9	-	SPAC2E1P5.05	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435962	2542246	2542410	278716	278874	SPAC17H9.12c	SPAC1834.11c	SPAC17H9.12c	sec18	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435963	2542386	2538877	278850	275456	SPAC1805.01c	SPCC1322.04	ppk6	fyu1	SPAPJ736.02c	SPCC1322.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435964	2542398	2541207	278862	277721	SPAC1805.03c	SPBC776.10c	trm13	cog6	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435965	2542418	2538952	278881	275526	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC1235.10c	dad2	sec6	hos2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435966	2542538	2540409	278995	276937	SPAC1805.11c	SPBC2D10.11c	rps2602	nap2	rps26-2	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435967	2542538	2540813	278995	277332	SPAC1805.11c	SPBC409.15	rps2602	SPBC409.15	rps26-2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435968	2542428	2543682	278890	280096	SPAC1805.12c	SPAC637.10c	uep1	rpn10	ubi2	pus1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435969	2542428	2539956	278890	276500	SPAC1805.12c	SPBC16E9.11c	uep1	pub3	ubi2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435970	2542435	2542435	278897	278897	SPAC1805.16c	SPAC1805.16c	SPAC1805.16c	SPAC1805.16c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435971	3361487	2541323	280563	277835	SPAC1805.17	SPBP35G2.14	crm1	SPBP35G2.14	SPAC1B2.01|caf2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435972	3361487	2538704	280563	275288	SPAC1805.17	SPCC320.07c	crm1	mde7	SPAC1B2.01|caf2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435973	3361487	2539106	280563	275678	SPAC1805.17	SPCC757.08	crm1	rrp45	SPAC1B2.01|caf2	SPCC757.08	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435974	2542148	2542086	278624	278563	SPAC1834.01	SPAC25H1.02	sup45	jmj1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435975	2542410	2542410	278874	278874	SPAC1834.11c	SPAC1834.11c	sec18	sec18	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435976	2542410	2541513	278874	278014	SPAC1834.11c	SPAC227.13c	sec18	isu1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435977	2542410	2542632	278874	279086	SPAC1834.11c	SPAC24H6.05	sec18	cdc25	-	sal2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435978	2542410	2541593	278874	278090	SPAC1834.11c	SPAC25B8.04c	sec18	mss51	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435979	2542410	2542094	278874	278571	SPAC1834.11c	SPAC29B12.06c	sec18	rcd1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435980	2542410	2543035	278874	279470	SPAC1834.11c	SPAC343.14c	sec18	SPAC343.14c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435981	2542410	2541713	278874	278208	SPAC1834.11c	SPAC3A12.12	sec18	atp11	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435982	2542410	2543386	278874	279808	SPAC1834.11c	SPAC644.17c	sec18	mrpl9	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435983	2542410	2541735	278874	278229	SPAC1834.11c	SPAC7D4.04	sec18	atg11	-	taf1|cvt9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435984	2542410	2539928	278874	276472	SPAC1834.11c	SPBC1604.08c	sec18	imp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435985	2542410	2540048	278874	276586	SPAC1834.11c	SPBC1711.02	sec18	mat3-Mc	-	matmc_1|matmc|mat3-Mc-silenced|mat3Mc|matmc_2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435986	2542410	2540467	278874	276995	SPAC1834.11c	SPBC2G2.07c	sec18	mug178	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435987	2542410	2541191	278874	277705	SPAC1834.11c	SPBC839.04	sec18	rpl803	-	rpk5-b|rpkD4|rpl8-3|SPBC24E9.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435988	2542410	2538956	278874	275530	SPAC1834.11c	SPCC1682.13	sec18	laf2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435989	2542410	2538945	278874	275519	SPAC1834.11c	SPCC1739.06c	sec18	SPCC1739.06c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435990	2542410	2539351	278874	275917	SPAC1834.11c	SPCC1840.11	sec18	csl4	-	SPCC965.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435991	2542410	2539540	278874	276102	SPAC1834.11c	SPCC736.12c	sec18	mmi1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435992	2542410	2539486	278874	276049	SPAC1834.11c	SPCC74.09	sec18	mug24	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435993	2542564	2539906	279020	276452	SPAC1851.03	SPBC16G5.17	ckb1	SPBC16G5.17	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435994	2542564	2540306	279020	276836	SPAC1851.03	SPBC2G5.02c	ckb1	ckb2	-	SPBC2G5.02c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435995	2542622	2539686	279076	276241	SPAC18B11.07c	SPBC1734.06	rhp6	rhp18	sng1|ubc2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435996	2542578	2542578	279034	279034	SPAC18B11.09c	SPAC18B11.09c	SPAC18B11.09c	SPAC18B11.09c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435997	2542299	2542299	278766	278766	SPAC18B11.10	SPAC18B11.10	tup11	tup11	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435998	2542239	2540735	278711	277258	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC83.03c	chp1	tas3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1435999	2542134	2538952	278610	275526	SPAC18G6.06	SPCC1235.10c	SPAC18G6.06	sec6	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436000	2542544	2539914	279001	276458	SPAC18G6.10	SPBC12D12.01	lem2	sad1	heh1	SPBC16H5.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436001	2542511	3361526	278969	280602	SPAC18G6.11c	SPAC664.15	rrn3	caf4	-	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436002	2542553	2540409	279010	276937	SPAC18G6.14c	SPBC2D10.11c	rps7	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436003	2542123	2542123	278599	278599	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC18G6.15	mal3	mal3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436004	2542123	2543399	278599	279821	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC3G9.12	mal3	peg1	-	cls1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436005	2542123	2539857	278599	276404	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC1604.20c	mal3	tea2	-	klp4	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436006	2542513	2538843	278971	275424	SPAC1952.05	SPCC162.08c	gcn5	nup211	kat2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436007	2542555	2540983	279012	277499	SPAC1952.06c	SPBC337.06c	SPAC1952.06c	cwf15	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436008	2542555	2538818	279012	275399	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC645.12c	SPAC1952.06c	SPCC645.12c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436009	2542558	2541746	279014	278240	SPAC1952.07	SPAC20G4.04c	rad1	hus1	rad19	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436010	2542558	2539744	279014	276296	SPAC1952.07	SPBC1105.15c	rad1	htd2	rad19	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436011	2542446	2539434	278907	275997	SPAC19A8.07c	SPCC757.09c	SPAC19A8.07c	rnc1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436012	2542542	2539686	278999	276241	SPAC19A8.10	SPBC1734.06	rfp1	rhp18	mug140	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436013	2542542	2540618	278999	277144	SPAC19A8.10	SPBC3D6.11c	rfp1	slx8	mug140	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436014	2542503	2541735	278961	278229	SPAC19A8.12	SPAC7D4.04	dcp2	atg11	-	taf1|cvt9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436015	2542503	2543290	278961	279715	SPAC19A8.12	SPAC9E9.10c	dcp2	cbh1	-	cbh	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436016	2542503	2540778	278961	277297	SPAC19A8.12	SPBC19G7.10c	dcp2	SPBC19G7.10c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436017	2542503	2541033	278961	277548	SPAC19A8.12	SPBC3B9.21	dcp2	dcp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436018	2542503	2538816	278961	275397	SPAC19A8.12	SPCC1442.10c	dcp2	rpb3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436019	2542503	2539360	278961	275926	SPAC19A8.12	SPCC613.04c	dcp2	rng3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436020	2542461	2540409	278922	276937	SPAC19A8.13	SPBC2D10.11c	usp101	nap2	snp1	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436021	2543591	2539531	280006	276093	SPAC19B12.01	SPCC576.02	SPAC19B12.01	SPCC576.02	SPAC4F10.21	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436022	2542606	2539994	279060	276538	SPAC19B12.10	SPBC1105.06	sst2	pmc4	-	med4	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436023	2542200	2541652	278675	278148	SPAC19D5.01	SPAC24B11.06c	pyp2	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436024	2542200	2543032	278675	279468	SPAC19D5.01	SPAC6F12.05c	pyp2	tnr3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436025	2542514	2539970	278972	276514	SPAC19D5.05c	SPBC1773.01	imp3	far8	-	SPBC1773.01|csc3	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436026	2542224	2542224	278697	278697	SPAC19G12.03	SPAC19G12.03	cda1	cda1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436027	2542470	2542470	278931	278931	SPAC19G12.04	SPAC19G12.04	dal1	dal1	SPAC19G12.04	SPAC19G12.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436028	2542244	2542414	278714	278878	SPAC19G12.13c	SPAC6F6.16c	poz1	tpz1	-	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436029	2542484	2543426	278944	279846	SPAC1A6.07	SPAC631.02	sle1	bdf2	SPAC1A6.07|seg1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436030	2542493	2540409	278952	276937	SPAC1B2.04	SPBC2D10.11c	cox6	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436031	2542512	2538946	278970	275520	SPAC1B3.01c	SPCC162.11c	SPAC1B3.01c	SPCC162.11c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436032	2542550	2542550	279007	279007	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC1B3.02c	SPAC1B3.02c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436033	2542429	2542429	278891	278891	SPAC1B3.07c	SPAC1B3.07c	vps28	vps28	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436034	2542528	2543058	278986	279492	SPAC1B3.08	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC1B3.08	rpn15	-	dss1|sem1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436035	2542492	2542873	278951	279318	SPAC1B9.02c	SPAC9G1.02	sck1	wis4	-	wak1|wik1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436036	2542452	2542042	278913	278523	SPAC1D4.02c	SPAC23A1.14c	SPAC1D4.02c	SPAC23A1.14c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436037	2542452	2541940	278913	278427	SPAC1D4.02c	SPAC27F1.02c	SPAC1D4.02c	cdc8	-	fus4	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436038	2542452	2543107	278913	279539	SPAC1D4.02c	SPAC3A12.05c	SPAC1D4.02c	taf2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436039	2542452	2541709	278913	278204	SPAC1D4.02c	SPAC3C7.02c	SPAC1D4.02c	pil2	-	SPAC3C7.02c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436040	2542452	2543157	278913	279588	SPAC1D4.02c	SPAC3F10.12c	SPAC1D4.02c	SPAC3F10.12c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436041	2542452	2543580	278913	279995	SPAC1D4.02c	SPAC644.14c	SPAC1D4.02c	rad51	-	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436042	2542452	2542733	278913	279183	SPAC1D4.02c	SPAC6F12.04	SPAC1D4.02c	SPAC6F12.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436043	2542452	2543032	278913	279468	SPAC1D4.02c	SPAC6F12.05c	SPAC1D4.02c	tnr3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436044	2542452	2541905	278913	278395	SPAC1D4.02c	SPAC6G9.01c	SPAC1D4.02c	SPAC6G9.01c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436045	2542452	2543290	278913	279715	SPAC1D4.02c	SPAC9E9.10c	SPAC1D4.02c	cbh1	-	cbh	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436046	2542452	2543324	278913	279747	SPAC1D4.02c	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC1D4.02c	vps17	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436047	2542452	2539920	278913	276464	SPAC1D4.02c	SPBC119.08	SPAC1D4.02c	pmk1	-	spm1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436048	2542452	2540099	278913	276637	SPAC1D4.02c	SPBC16H5.11c	SPAC1D4.02c	skb1	-	rmt5	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436049	2542452	3361273	278913	280349	SPAC1D4.02c	SPBC1709.20	SPAC1D4.02c	pop8	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436050	2542452	2540725	278913	277248	SPAC1D4.02c	SPBC215.14c	SPAC1D4.02c	vps20	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436051	2542452	2540546	278913	277073	SPAC1D4.02c	SPBC25B2.06c	SPAC1D4.02c	btb2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436052	2542452	2540569	278913	277096	SPAC1D4.02c	SPBC660.17c	SPAC1D4.02c	SPBC660.17c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436053	2542452	2540755	278913	277276	SPAC1D4.02c	SPBC713.09	SPAC1D4.02c	SPBC713.09	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436054	2542452	2539281	278913	275849	SPAC1D4.02c	SPCC132.03	SPAC1D4.02c	SPCC132.03	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436055	2542452	2539093	278913	275665	SPAC1D4.02c	SPCC736.15	SPAC1D4.02c	pil1	-	SPCC736.15	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436056	2542452	2539171	278913	275742	SPAC1D4.02c	SPCC830.08c	SPAC1D4.02c	yop1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436057	3361532	2540019	280608	276563	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC1685.01	lkh1	pmp1	kic1	dsp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436058	2542137	2542474	278613	278934	SPAC1D4.13	SPAC31G5.09c	byr1	spk1	ste1|ste3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436059	2542137	2543157	278613	279588	SPAC1D4.13	SPAC3F10.12c	byr1	SPAC3F10.12c	ste1|ste3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436060	2542137	2543580	278613	279995	SPAC1D4.13	SPAC644.14c	byr1	rad51	ste1|ste3	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436061	2542137	2543646	278613	280060	SPAC1D4.13	SPAC821.07c	byr1	moc3	ste1|ste3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436062	2542137	2543290	278613	279715	SPAC1D4.13	SPAC9E9.10c	byr1	cbh1	ste1|ste3	cbh	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436063	2542137	2539728	278613	276280	SPAC1D4.13	SPBC14F5.12c	byr1	cbh2	ste1|ste3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436064	2542137	2540612	278613	277138	SPAC1D4.13	SPBC1D7.05	byr1	byr2	ste1|ste3	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436065	2542137	2540537	278613	277064	SPAC1D4.13	SPBC56F2.07c	byr1	SPBC56F2.07c	ste1|ste3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436066	2542260	2542728	278729	279178	SPAC1F12.05	SPAC25B8.13c	SPAC1F12.05	isp7	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436067	2542260	2543208	278729	279637	SPAC1F12.05	SPAC328.04	SPAC1F12.05	SPAC328.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436068	2542260	2543646	278729	280060	SPAC1F12.05	SPAC821.07c	SPAC1F12.05	moc3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436069	2542260	2539956	278729	276500	SPAC1F12.05	SPBC16E9.11c	SPAC1F12.05	pub3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436070	2542175	2540919	278650	277435	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC543.07	mkh1	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436071	2541687	3361526	278183	280602	SPAC1F7.06	SPAC664.15	hsp3105	caf4	SPAC1F7.06	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436072	2541441	2541441	277946	277946	SPAC1F7.09c	SPAC1F7.09c	SPAC1F7.09c	SPAC1F7.09c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436073	2541441	2543517	277946	279935	SPAC1F7.09c	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC1F7.09c	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436074	2541441	2543646	277946	280060	SPAC1F7.09c	SPAC821.07c	SPAC1F7.09c	moc3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436075	2541441	2539984	277946	276528	SPAC1F7.09c	SPBC1289.11	SPAC1F7.09c	spf38	-	cwf17	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436076	2541441	2539928	277946	276472	SPAC1F7.09c	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC1F7.09c	imp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436077	2541822	2541822	278313	278313	SPAC1F7.10	SPAC1F7.10	SPAC1F7.10	SPAC1F7.10	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436078	2541822	2541941	278313	278428	SPAC1F7.10	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC1F7.10	tfs1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436079	2541822	2542094	278313	278571	SPAC1F7.10	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC1F7.10	rcd1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436080	2541822	2543517	278313	279935	SPAC1F7.10	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC1F7.10	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436081	2541822	2539928	278313	276472	SPAC1F7.10	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC1F7.10	imp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436082	2541822	2539531	278313	276093	SPAC1F7.10	SPCC576.02	SPAC1F7.10	SPCC576.02	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436083	2541541	2541541	278041	278041	SPAC1F7.11c	SPAC1F7.11c	SPAC1F7.11c	SPAC1F7.11c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436084	5802952	2540409	858090	276937	SPAC1F7.13c	SPBC2D10.11c	rpl801	nap2	SPAC21E11.02c|rpk5a|rpl18|rpl2-1|rpl8-1	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436085	2541879	2543032	278369	279468	SPAC1F8.05	SPAC6F12.05c	isp3	tnr3	meu4	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436086	2541879	2539052	278369	275625	SPAC1F8.05	SPCC663.09c	isp3	SPCC663.09c	meu4	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436087	2541874	2541874	278364	278364	SPAC1F8.07c	SPAC1F8.07c	SPAC1F8.07c	SPAC1F8.07c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436088	2541728	2541735	278222	278229	SPAC20G4.03c	SPAC7D4.04	hri1	atg11	-	taf1|cvt9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436089	5802967	2540778	858105	277297	SPAC20G4.08	SPBC19G7.10c	pdc1	SPBC19G7.10c	SPAC20G4.08|SPAC4F10.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436090	2542001	2539041	278485	275614	SPAC20G8.06	SPCC18.06c	not1	caf1	-	pop2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436091	3361548	3361548	280624	280624	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC20G8.10c	atg6	atg6	SPAC3A12.01c	SPAC3A12.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436092	3361548	2541930	280624	278418	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC23C4.10	atg6	sec2	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436093	3361548	2541713	280624	278208	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC3A12.12	atg6	atp11	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436094	3361548	2541735	280624	278229	SPAC20G8.10c	SPAC7D4.04	atg6	atg11	SPAC3A12.01c	taf1|cvt9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436095	3361548	2539838	280624	276387	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC1347.10	atg6	cdc23	SPAC3A12.01c	mcm10	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436096	3361548	2539740	280624	276292	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC1685.04	atg6	SPBC1685.04	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436097	3361548	2540836	280624	277354	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC18H10.19	atg6	vps38	SPAC3A12.01c	atg14	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436098	3361548	2540892	280624	277408	SPAC20G8.10c	SPBC530.01	atg6	gyp1	SPAC3A12.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436099	3361548	2539210	280624	275780	SPAC20G8.10c	SPCC2H8.05c	atg6	dbl1	SPAC3A12.01c	SPCC2H8.05c|SPCC63.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436100	2541941	2541723	278428	278217	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC22H12.01c	tfs1	mug35	-	SPAC23G3.13c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436101	2541941	2541930	278428	278418	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC23C4.10	tfs1	sec2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436102	2541941	2541852	278428	278343	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC23H3.09c	tfs1	gly1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436103	2541941	2541872	278428	278362	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC23H4.10c	tfs1	thi4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436104	2541941	2542720	278428	279171	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC25G10.05c	tfs1	his1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436105	2541941	2542096	278428	278572	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC26H5.02c	tfs1	SPAC26H5.02c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436106	2541941	2541617	278428	278114	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC27D7.04	tfs1	omt2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436107	2541941	2542689	278428	279142	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC29B12.04	tfs1	snz1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436108	2541941	2542236	278428	278708	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC30D11.08c	tfs1	phf2	-	saf60|swp2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436109	2541941	2543208	278428	279637	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC328.04	tfs1	SPAC328.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436110	2541941	2542567	278428	279023	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC328.05	tfs1	SPAC328.05	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436111	2541941	2541709	278428	278204	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC3C7.02c	tfs1	pil2	-	SPAC3C7.02c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436112	2541941	2543687	278428	280101	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC3C7.04	tfs1	SPAC3C7.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436113	2541941	2543157	278428	279588	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC3F10.12c	tfs1	SPAC3F10.12c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436114	2541941	2543209	278428	279638	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC3G6.03c	tfs1	SPAC3G6.03c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436115	2541941	2543377	278428	279799	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC3H1.07	tfs1	aru1	-	car3	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436116	2541941	2542731	278428	279181	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC5H10.09c	tfs1	SPAC5H10.09c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436117	2541941	2543580	278428	279995	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC644.14c	tfs1	rad51	-	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436118	2541941	3361526	278428	280602	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC664.15	tfs1	caf4	-	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436119	2541941	2542733	278428	279183	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC6F12.04	tfs1	SPAC6F12.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436120	2541941	2543032	278428	279468	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC6F12.05c	tfs1	tnr3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436121	2541941	2542619	278428	279073	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC6G10.02c	tfs1	tea3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436122	2541941	2541735	278428	278229	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC7D4.04	tfs1	atg11	-	taf1|cvt9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436123	2541941	2543055	278428	279489	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC806.06c	tfs1	SPAC806.06c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436124	2541941	2543111	278428	279543	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC806.07	tfs1	ndk1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436125	2541941	2543646	278428	280060	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC821.07c	tfs1	moc3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436126	2541941	2543382	278428	279804	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC890.02c	tfs1	alp7	-	mia1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436127	2541941	2542106	278428	278582	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC8E11.03c	tfs1	dmc1	-	dmp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436128	2541941	2543290	278428	279715	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC9E9.10c	tfs1	cbh1	-	cbh	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436129	2541941	2539832	278428	276381	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC1271.04c	tfs1	SPBC1271.04c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436130	2541941	2539728	278428	276280	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC14F5.12c	tfs1	cbh2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436131	2541941	2539717	278428	276270	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC15D4.08c	tfs1	SPBC15D4.08c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436132	2541941	2539968	278428	276512	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC16E9.10c	tfs1	SPBC16E9.10c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436133	2541941	2539631	278428	276187	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC16G5.16	tfs1	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436134	2541941	2539906	278428	276452	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC16G5.17	tfs1	SPBC16G5.17	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436135	2541941	2539851	278428	276399	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC1734.03	tfs1	SPBC1734.03	-	SPBC337.19	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436136	2541941	2539785	278428	276335	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC1773.16c	tfs1	SPBC1773.16c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436137	2541941	2539827	278428	276376	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC1861.02	tfs1	abp2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436138	2541941	2540778	278428	277297	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC19G7.10c	tfs1	SPBC19G7.10c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436139	2541941	2540725	278428	277248	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC215.14c	tfs1	vps20	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436140	2541941	2540712	278428	277235	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC216.02	tfs1	mcp5	-	mug21|num1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436141	2541941	2540526	278428	277054	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC26H8.01	tfs1	thi2	-	nmt2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436142	2541941	2540409	278428	276937	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC2D10.11c	tfs1	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436143	2541941	2540306	278428	276836	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC2G5.02c	tfs1	ckb2	-	SPBC2G5.02c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436144	2541941	2540350	278428	276879	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC317.01	tfs1	mbx2	-	pvg4	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436145	2541941	2540051	278428	276589	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC32H8.12c	tfs1	act1	-	cps8|pi012	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436146	2541941	2541054	278428	277569	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC3B8.08	tfs1	SPBC3B8.08	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436147	2541941	2541125	278428	277640	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC409.13	tfs1	rib4	-	SPBC409.13	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436148	2541941	2540903	278428	277419	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC530.05	tfs1	prt1	-	SPBC530.05	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436149	2541941	2540537	278428	277064	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC56F2.07c	tfs1	SPBC56F2.07c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436150	2541941	2540821	278428	277339	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC800.03	tfs1	clr3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436151	2541941	2540735	278428	277258	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC83.03c	tfs1	tas3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436152	2541941	2541287	278428	277800	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBP22H7.05c	tfs1	abo2	-	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436153	2541941	2541362	278428	277873	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBP8B7.05c	tfs1	nce103	-	SPBP8B7.05c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436154	2541941	2538952	278428	275526	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC1235.10c	tfs1	sec6	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436155	2541941	2539062	278428	275634	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC126.10	tfs1	iah1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436156	2541941	2539242	278428	275812	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC290.04	tfs1	ams2	-	SPCC4F11.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436157	2541941	2539562	278428	276123	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC569.01c	tfs1	SPCC569.01c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436158	2541941	2539531	278428	276093	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC576.02	tfs1	SPCC576.02	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436159	2541941	2539500	278428	276063	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC61.03	tfs1	SPCC61.03	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436160	2541941	2539349	278428	275915	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC613.11c	tfs1	meu23	-	B13958-2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436161	2541941	2539093	278428	275665	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC736.15	tfs1	pil1	-	SPCC736.15	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436162	2541941	2539434	278428	275997	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC757.09c	tfs1	rnc1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436163	2541941	2539171	278428	275742	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC830.08c	tfs1	yop1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436164	2541941	2539593	278428	276151	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCP20C8.01c	tfs1	SPCP20C8.01c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436165	2542014	2542014	278497	278497	SPAC20H4.04	SPAC20H4.04	fml2	fml2	mfh2	mfh2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436166	2542007	2543086	278490	279519	SPAC20H4.07	SPAC30D11.10	rad57	rad52	rhp57|SPAC145.01	rad22|rad22A	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436167	2542831	2541901	279278	278391	SPAC20H4.08	SPAC2F7.02c	whi2	SPAC2F7.02c	SPAC20H4.08|SPAC145.02	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436168	2542023	2542667	278506	279120	SPAC20H4.10	SPAC26A3.16	ufd2	dph1	SPAC145.04	ucp5	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436169	2542047	2543157	278528	279588	SPAC21E11.03c	SPAC3F10.12c	pcr1	SPAC3F10.12c	mts2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436170	2542047	2540329	278528	276859	SPAC21E11.03c	SPBC29B5.01	pcr1	atf1	mts2	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436171	2542064	2543035	278541	279470	SPAC21E11.06	SPAC343.14c	tif224	SPAC343.14c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436172	2541950	2539785	278437	276335	SPAC222.03c	SPBC1773.16c	tim10	SPBC1773.16c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436173	2541944	2541944	278431	278431	SPAC222.06	SPAC222.06	mak16	mak16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436174	2541464	2541464	277966	277966	SPAC222.08c	SPAC222.08c	SPAC222.08c	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436175	2541464	2542689	277966	279142	SPAC222.08c	SPAC29B12.04	SPAC222.08c	snz1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436176	2541936	2542162	278423	278638	SPAC222.10c	SPAC6F6.08c	byr4	cdc16	-	bub2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436177	2541934	2542698	278422	279151	SPAC222.11	SPAC26H5.09c	hem13	SPAC26H5.09c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436178	2541934	2540095	278422	276633	SPAC222.11	SPBC115.03	hem13	SPBC115.03	-	SPBC839.18c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436179	2542066	2539750	278543	276302	SPAC227.05	SPBC14F5.10c	SPAC227.05	SPBC14F5.10c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436180	2541426	2543575	277931	279990	SPAC227.06	SPAC644.13c	SPAC227.06	SPAC644.13c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436181	2541506	2541873	278008	278363	SPAC227.08c	SPAC22G7.10	yth1	iss1	-	SPAC22G7.10	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436182	2541513	2543157	278014	279588	SPAC227.13c	SPAC3F10.12c	isu1	SPAC3F10.12c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436183	2541513	2543580	278014	279995	SPAC227.13c	SPAC644.14c	isu1	rad51	-	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436184	2541513	3361526	278014	280602	SPAC227.13c	SPAC664.15	isu1	caf4	-	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436185	2541513	2539631	278014	276187	SPAC227.13c	SPBC16G5.16	isu1	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436186	2541513	2539785	278014	276335	SPAC227.13c	SPBC1773.16c	isu1	SPBC1773.16c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436187	2541513	2540409	278014	276937	SPAC227.13c	SPBC2D10.11c	isu1	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436188	2541513	2538952	278014	275526	SPAC227.13c	SPCC1235.10c	isu1	sec6	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436189	2541513	2538843	278014	275424	SPAC227.13c	SPCC162.08c	isu1	nup211	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436190	2541500	2541112	278002	277627	SPAC227.18	SPBC725.07	lys3	pex5	SPAC2F7.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436191	2541521	2543646	278022	280060	SPAC22A12.05	SPAC821.07c	rpc11	moc3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436192	2541437	2540622	277942	277148	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC21C3.05	sap114	sap62	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436193	2541437	2540932	277942	277448	SPAC22A12.09c	SPBC36.09	sap114	sap61	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436194	2541837	2542731	278328	279181	SPAC22A12.12c	SPAC5H10.09c	rrp40	SPAC5H10.09c	SPAC22A12.12c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436195	2541835	2539830	278326	276379	SPAC22E12.08	SPBC17D1.04	rrn10	acr1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436196	2541835	2540207	278326	276740	SPAC22E12.08	SPBP8B7.17c	rrn10	SPBP8B7.17c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436197	2541850	2541735	278341	278229	SPAC22E12.18	SPAC7D4.04	SPAC22E12.18	atg11	-	taf1|cvt9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436198	2541792	2538701	278283	275286	SPAC22E12.19	SPCC1235.09	snt1	hif2	SPAC2E12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436199	3361436	3361436	280512	280512	SPAC1296.01c	SPAC1296.01c	SPAC1296.01c	SPAC1296.01c	SPAC22F3.01	SPAC22F3.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436200	2541860	2540363	278350	276892	SPAC22F3.02	SPBC2F12.09c	atf31	atf21	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436201	2541871	2540341	278361	276870	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC2F12.11c	res2	rep2	mcs1|pct1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436202	2541871	2540234	278361	276766	SPAC22F3.09c	SPBC336.12c	res2	cdc10	mcs1|pct1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436203	2541871	2539366	278361	275932	SPAC22F3.09c	SPCC16C4.11	res2	pef1	mcs1|pct1	p31	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436204	2541601	2540526	278098	277054	SPAC22F8.08	SPBC26H8.01	sec24	thi2	sfb2	nmt2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436205	2541601	2541164	278098	277679	SPAC22F8.08	SPBC776.04	sec24	sec2302	sfb2	sec23-b	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436206	2541601	2538699	278098	275284	SPAC22F8.08	SPCC31H12.07	sec24	sec231	sfb2	SPCC5E4.01|sec23a	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436207	2541683	2539966	278179	276510	SPAC22G7.03	SPBC11B10.06	SPAC22G7.03	sws1	-	pi005|SPACTOKYO_453.32	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436208	2541890	2543382	278380	279804	SPAC22G7.09c	SPAC890.02c	nup45	alp7	-	mia1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436209	2541890	2540537	278380	277064	SPAC22G7.09c	SPBC56F2.07c	nup45	SPBC56F2.07c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436210	2541751	3361526	278245	280602	SPAC22G7.11c	SPAC664.15	cum1	caf4	SPAC22G7.11c|SPAC4G8.01c	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436211	2541730	2541020	278224	277535	SPAC22H10.11c	SPBC354.04	SPAC22H10.11c	SPBC354.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436212	2541723	2541723	278217	278217	SPAC22H12.01c	SPAC22H12.01c	mug35	mug35	SPAC23G3.13c	SPAC23G3.13c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436213	2541723	2543290	278217	279715	SPAC22H12.01c	SPAC9E9.10c	mug35	cbh1	SPAC23G3.13c	cbh	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436214	2541989	2540409	278473	276937	SPAC23A1.08c	SPBC2D10.11c	rpl3401	nap2	rpl34|rpl34-1	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436215	2542042	2542042	278523	278523	SPAC23A1.14c	SPAC23A1.14c	SPAC23A1.14c	SPAC23A1.14c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436216	2542042	2543214	278523	279643	SPAC23A1.14c	SPAC6F12.06	SPAC23A1.14c	SPAC6F12.06	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436217	2542042	2539928	278523	276472	SPAC23A1.14c	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC23A1.14c	imp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436218	2542042	2541112	278523	277627	SPAC23A1.14c	SPBC725.07	SPAC23A1.14c	pex5	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436219	2541996	2541081	278480	277596	SPAC23A1.15c	SPBC691.02c	sec20	drp1	-	SPBC691.02c|pi034|SPACTOKYO_453.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436220	2542012	2540409	278495	276937	SPAC23C11.02c	SPBC2D10.11c	rps23	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436221	2542051	2542051	278530	278530	SPAC23C11.06c	SPAC23C11.06c	SPAC23C11.06c	SPAC23C11.06c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436222	2542027	2540406	278509	276934	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC30D10.02	php3	SPBC30D10.02	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436223	2542027	2540133	278509	276670	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC3B8.02	php3	php5	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436224	2542027	2541156	278509	277671	SPAC23C11.08	SPBC685.07c	php3	rpl2701	-	rpl27-1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436225	2542045	2541592	278526	278089	SPAC23C11.12	SPAC6F12.15c	hcn1	cut9	-	dre1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436226	2541970	2541970	278455	278455	SPAC23C11.13c	SPAC23C11.13c	hpt1	hpt1	pur1	pur1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436227	2541970	2541310	278455	277822	SPAC23C11.13c	SPBP18G5.03	hpt1	toc1	pur1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436228	2541970	2539275	278455	275843	SPAC23C11.13c	SPCC1450.04	hpt1	tef5	pur1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436229	2541952	2543032	278439	279468	SPAC23C11.17	SPAC6F12.05c	mdm28	tnr3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436230	2541923	2541709	278411	278204	SPAC23C4.09c	SPAC3C7.02c	SPAC23C4.09c	pil2	-	SPAC3C7.02c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436231	2541930	2541930	278418	278418	SPAC23C4.10	SPAC23C4.10	sec2	sec2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436232	2541930	2543157	278418	279588	SPAC23C4.10	SPAC3F10.12c	sec2	SPAC3F10.12c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436233	2541930	2543517	278418	279935	SPAC23C4.10	SPAC3G9.05	sec2	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436234	2541930	2543529	278418	279947	SPAC23C4.10	SPAC4C5.02c	sec2	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436235	2541930	2542619	278418	279073	SPAC23C4.10	SPAC6G10.02c	sec2	tea3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436236	2541930	2541456	278418	277959	SPAC23C4.10	SPAC6G9.04	sec2	spo7	-	mug79	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436237	2541930	2541735	278418	278229	SPAC23C4.10	SPAC7D4.04	sec2	atg11	-	taf1|cvt9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436238	2541930	2543646	278418	280060	SPAC23C4.10	SPAC821.07c	sec2	moc3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436239	2541930	2539728	278418	276280	SPAC23C4.10	SPBC14F5.12c	sec2	cbh2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436240	2541930	2539631	278418	276187	SPAC23C4.10	SPBC16G5.16	sec2	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436241	2541930	2541306	278418	277818	SPAC23C4.10	SPBP16F5.07	sec2	apm1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436242	2541930	2538929	278418	275505	SPAC23C4.10	SPCC162.02c	sec2	SPCC162.02c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436243	2541930	2538843	278418	275424	SPAC23C4.10	SPCC162.08c	sec2	nup211	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436244	2541930	2539017	278418	275590	SPAC23C4.10	SPCC338.13	sec2	cog4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436245	2541930	2539581	278418	276140	SPAC23C4.10	SPCC965.03	sec2	vma8	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436246	2541929	2541207	278417	277721	SPAC23C4.12	SPBC776.10c	hhp2	cog6	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436247	2541910	2543580	278400	279995	SPAC23C4.15	SPAC644.14c	rpb5	rad51	-	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436248	2541910	2543032	278400	279468	SPAC23C4.15	SPAC6F12.05c	rpb5	tnr3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436249	2541482	2541482	277984	277984	SPAC23D3.03c	SPAC23D3.03c	SPAC23D3.03c	SPAC23D3.03c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436250	2541482	2539928	277984	276472	SPAC23D3.03c	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC23D3.03c	imp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436251	2541507	2540395	278009	276923	SPAC23D3.06c	SPBC31E1.05	nup146	gle1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436252	2541487	2540869	277989	277386	SPAC23D3.08	SPBC4B4.09	usp108	usp105	-	prp39	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436253	2541480	2539945	277982	276489	SPAC23D3.10c	SPBC119.05c	eng2	SPBC119.05c	-	csh3	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436254	2541522	2540578	278023	277104	SPAC23E2.01	SPBC26H8.06	fep1	grx4	gaf2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436255	2541831	2539956	278322	276500	SPAC23G3.03	SPBC16E9.11c	sib2	pub3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436256	2541831	2540612	278322	277138	SPAC23G3.03	SPBC1D7.05	sib2	byr2	-	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436257	2541831	2539063	278322	275635	SPAC23G3.03	SPCC126.12	sib2	SPCC126.12	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436258	2541812	2541812	278303	278303	SPAC23G3.12c	SPAC23G3.12c	SPAC23G3.12c	SPAC23G3.12c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436259	2541852	2541852	278343	278343	SPAC23H3.09c	SPAC23H3.09c	gly1	gly1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436260	2541852	2543517	278343	279935	SPAC23H3.09c	SPAC3G9.05	gly1	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436261	2541852	2539928	278343	276472	SPAC23H3.09c	SPBC1604.08c	gly1	imp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436262	2541852	2541306	278343	277818	SPAC23H3.09c	SPBP16F5.07	gly1	apm1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436263	2541851	2539832	278342	276381	SPAC23H3.10	SPBC1271.04c	ssr2	SPBC1271.04c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436264	2541872	2541872	278362	278362	SPAC23H4.10c	SPAC23H4.10c	thi4	thi4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436265	2541872	2543517	278362	279935	SPAC23H4.10c	SPAC3G9.05	thi4	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436266	2541872	2539928	278362	276472	SPAC23H4.10c	SPBC1604.08c	thi4	imp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436267	2541788	2538719	278280	275303	SPAC23H4.11c	SPCC1393.04	cnl2	fta4	-	sma4	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436268	2541562	2541562	278061	278061	SPAC24B11.05	SPAC24B11.05	SPAC24B11.05	SPAC24B11.05	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436269	2541652	2541652	278148	278148	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC24B11.06c	sty1	sty1	phh1|spc1	phh1|spc1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436270	2541652	2540329	278148	276859	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC29B5.01	sty1	atf1	phh1|spc1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436271	2541652	2540394	278148	276922	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC2D10.09	sty1	snr1	phh1|spc1	SPBC2D10.09	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436272	2541652	2541055	278148	277570	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC409.07c	sty1	wis1	phh1|spc1	smf2|spc2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436273	2541652	2539495	278148	276058	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC4F11.02	sty1	ptc1	phh1|spc1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436274	3361383	3361383	280459	280459	SPAC24B11.13	SPAC24B11.13	hem3	hem3	SPAC806.01	SPAC806.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436275	2541676	2539994	278172	276538	SPAC24C9.04	SPBC1105.06	SPAC24C9.04	pmc4	-	med4	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436276	2541689	2539750	278185	276302	SPAC24C9.05c	SPBC14F5.10c	mug70	SPBC14F5.10c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436277	2542651	2542651	279105	279105	SPAC24C9.12c	SPAC24C9.12c	SPAC24C9.12c	SPAC24C9.12c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436278	2542649	2543170	279103	279601	SPAC24C9.14	SPAC343.09	otu1	ubx3	mug141	mug39	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436279	2542649	2543475	279103	279895	SPAC24C9.14	SPAC890.08	otu1	rpl31	mug141	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436280	2542649	2539945	279103	276489	SPAC24C9.14	SPBC119.05c	otu1	SPBC119.05c	mug141	csh3	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436281	2542629	2540409	279083	276937	SPAC24H6.07	SPBC2D10.11c	rps901	nap2	rps9-1|rps9a	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436282	2542626	2543157	279080	279588	SPAC24H6.08	SPAC3F10.12c	SPAC24H6.08	SPAC3F10.12c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436283	2542626	2541590	279080	278087	SPAC24H6.08	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC24H6.08	cdr2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436284	2542626	2541735	279080	278229	SPAC24H6.08	SPAC7D4.04	SPAC24H6.08	atg11	-	taf1|cvt9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436285	2542626	2538843	279080	275424	SPAC24H6.08	SPCC162.08c	SPAC24H6.08	nup211	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436286	2542635	2542635	279089	279089	SPAC24H6.09	SPAC24H6.09	gef1	gef1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436287	2542635	2542096	279089	278572	SPAC24H6.09	SPAC26H5.02c	gef1	SPAC26H5.02c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436288	2542635	2541713	279089	278208	SPAC24H6.09	SPAC3A12.12	gef1	atp11	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436289	2542635	2543409	279089	279831	SPAC24H6.09	SPAC4D7.13	gef1	usp104	-	prp40	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436290	2542635	2543648	279089	280062	SPAC24H6.09	SPAC4F10.09c	gef1	SPAC4F10.09c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436291	2542635	2543221	279089	279649	SPAC24H6.09	SPAC637.04	gef1	SPAC637.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436292	2542635	3361526	279089	280602	SPAC24H6.09	SPAC664.15	gef1	caf4	-	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436293	2542635	2541456	279089	277959	SPAC24H6.09	SPAC6G9.04	gef1	spo7	-	mug79	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436294	2542635	2542740	279089	279190	SPAC24H6.09	SPAC9G1.06c	gef1	cyk3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436295	2542635	2539649	279089	276204	SPAC24H6.09	SPBC12D12.04c	gef1	pck2	-	pkc1|sts6	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436296	2542635	2539838	279089	276387	SPAC24H6.09	SPBC1347.10	gef1	cdc23	-	mcm10	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436297	2542635	2539631	279089	276187	SPAC24H6.09	SPBC16G5.16	gef1	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436298	2542635	2539886	279089	276432	SPAC24H6.09	SPBC1734.10c	gef1	SPBC1734.10c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436299	2542635	2540760	279089	277280	SPAC24H6.09	SPBC21.05c	gef1	ral2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436300	2542635	2541281	279089	277794	SPAC24H6.09	SPBC902.04	gef1	rmn1	-	SPBC902.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436301	2542635	2538952	279089	275526	SPAC24H6.09	SPCC1235.10c	gef1	sec6	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436302	2542635	2539351	279089	275917	SPAC24H6.09	SPCC1840.11	gef1	csl4	-	SPCC965.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436303	2542631	2542631	279085	279085	SPAC24H6.10c	SPAC24H6.10c	SPAC24H6.10c	SPAC24H6.10c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436304	2542631	2539994	279085	276538	SPAC24H6.10c	SPBC1105.06	SPAC24H6.10c	pmc4	-	med4	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436305	2541531	2541346	278031	277857	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP8B7.08c	fft3	ppm1	snf2SR	SPBP8B7.08c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436306	2541697	2541697	278193	278193	SPAC25B8.02	SPAC25B8.02	sds3	sds3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436307	2541697	2539360	278193	275926	SPAC25B8.02	SPCC613.04c	sds3	rng3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436308	2541593	2543157	278090	279588	SPAC25B8.04c	SPAC3F10.12c	mss51	SPAC3F10.12c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436309	2541593	2542733	278090	279183	SPAC25B8.04c	SPAC6F12.04	mss51	SPAC6F12.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436310	2541593	2541735	278090	278229	SPAC25B8.04c	SPAC7D4.04	mss51	atg11	-	taf1|cvt9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436311	2541593	2543646	278090	280060	SPAC25B8.04c	SPAC821.07c	mss51	moc3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436312	2541593	2542106	278090	278582	SPAC25B8.04c	SPAC8E11.03c	mss51	dmc1	-	dmp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436313	2541593	2543290	278090	279715	SPAC25B8.04c	SPAC9E9.10c	mss51	cbh1	-	cbh	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436314	2541593	2539631	278090	276187	SPAC25B8.04c	SPBC16G5.16	mss51	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436315	2541593	2541054	278090	277569	SPAC25B8.04c	SPBC3B8.08	mss51	SPBC3B8.08	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436316	2541593	2539093	278090	275665	SPAC25B8.04c	SPCC736.15	mss51	pil1	-	SPCC736.15	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436317	2541593	2539171	278090	275742	SPAC25B8.04c	SPCC830.08c	mss51	yop1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436318	2541658	2541658	278154	278154	SPAC25B8.09	SPAC25B8.09	SPAC25B8.09	SPAC25B8.09	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436319	2541658	2543646	278154	280060	SPAC25B8.09	SPAC821.07c	SPAC25B8.09	moc3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436320	2541658	2539000	278154	275574	SPAC25B8.09	SPCC1450.06c	SPAC25B8.09	grx3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436321	2542728	2540833	279178	277351	SPAC25B8.13c	SPBC18H10.20c	isp7	any1	-	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436322	3361412	2539818	280488	276368	SPAC25G10.01	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC25G10.01	srp1	SPAC2C4.18	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436323	2542720	2542720	279171	279171	SPAC25G10.05c	SPAC25G10.05c	his1	his1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436324	2542720	2543517	279171	279935	SPAC25G10.05c	SPAC3G9.05	his1	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436325	2542720	2539928	279171	276472	SPAC25G10.05c	SPBC1604.08c	his1	imp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436326	2542720	2539642	279171	276197	SPAC25G10.05c	SPBC1706.01	his1	tea4	-	wsh3	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436327	2542090	3361526	278567	280602	SPAC25G10.08	SPAC664.15	SPAC25G10.08	caf4	p116	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436328	2542090	2540578	278567	277104	SPAC25G10.08	SPBC26H8.06	SPAC25G10.08	grx4	p116	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436329	2542090	2540735	278567	277258	SPAC25G10.08	SPBC83.03c	SPAC25G10.08	tas3	p116	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436330	5802955	5802955	858093	858093	SPAC25G10.09c	SPAC25G10.09c	pan1	pan1	SPAC27F1.01c	SPAC27F1.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436331	5802955	2539045	858093	275618	SPAC25G10.09c	SPCC1235.05c	pan1	fft2	SPAC27F1.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436332	2542729	2541620	279179	278117	SPAC26A3.03c	SPAC2G11.12	rmi1	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436333	2542729	2543157	279179	279588	SPAC26A3.03c	SPAC3F10.12c	rmi1	SPAC3F10.12c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436334	2542729	3361526	279179	280602	SPAC26A3.03c	SPAC664.15	rmi1	caf4	-	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436335	2542729	2542106	279179	278582	SPAC26A3.03c	SPAC8E11.03c	rmi1	dmc1	-	dmp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436336	2542729	2543290	279179	279715	SPAC26A3.03c	SPAC9E9.10c	rmi1	cbh1	-	cbh	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436337	2542729	2539728	279179	276280	SPAC26A3.03c	SPBC14F5.12c	rmi1	cbh2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436338	2542729	2539631	279179	276187	SPAC26A3.03c	SPBC16G5.16	rmi1	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436339	2542729	2540409	279179	276937	SPAC26A3.03c	SPBC2D10.11c	rmi1	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436340	2542729	2540735	279179	277258	SPAC26A3.03c	SPBC83.03c	rmi1	tas3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436341	2542729	2539562	279179	276123	SPAC26A3.03c	SPCC569.01c	rmi1	SPCC569.01c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436342	2542729	2539349	279179	275915	SPAC26A3.03c	SPCC613.11c	rmi1	meu23	-	B13958-2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436343	2542668	2540775	279121	277295	SPAC26A3.15c	SPBC19G7.15	nsp1	nup44	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436344	2542667	2542667	279120	279120	SPAC26A3.16	SPAC26A3.16	dph1	dph1	ucp5	ucp5	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436345	2542667	2543044	279120	279479	SPAC26A3.16	SPAC3C7.12	dph1	tip1	ucp5	noc1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436346	2542667	2540586	279120	277112	SPAC26A3.16	SPBC27.01c	dph1	SPBC27.01c	ucp5	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436347	2542667	2540264	279120	276795	SPAC26A3.16	SPBC32H8.03	dph1	bem46	ucp5	SPACTOKYO_453.15c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436348	2542073	2539782	278550	276332	SPAC26F1.01	SPBC1815.01	sec74	eno101	SPAPJ691.01c	eno1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436349	2542677	2543032	279130	279468	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC6F12.05c	pyp1	tnr3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436350	2542677	2538952	279130	275526	SPAC26F1.10c	SPCC1235.10c	pyp1	sec6	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436351	2542675	2539704	279128	276257	SPAC26F1.12c	SPBC119.10	hgh1	asn1	SPAC26F1.12c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436352	2542675	2540977	279128	277493	SPAC26F1.12c	SPBC3E7.02c	hgh1	hsp16	SPAC26F1.12c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436353	2542096	2542096	278572	278572	SPAC26H5.02c	SPAC26H5.02c	SPAC26H5.02c	SPAC26H5.02c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436354	2542096	2543517	278572	279935	SPAC26H5.02c	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC26H5.02c	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436355	2542096	2543221	278572	279649	SPAC26H5.02c	SPAC637.04	SPAC26H5.02c	SPAC637.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436356	2542096	2541456	278572	277959	SPAC26H5.02c	SPAC6G9.04	SPAC26H5.02c	spo7	-	mug79	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436357	2542096	2539887	278572	276433	SPAC26H5.02c	SPBC13G1.09	SPAC26H5.02c	SPBC13G1.09	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436358	2542096	2540580	278572	277106	SPAC26H5.02c	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC26H5.02c	ran1	-	pat1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436359	2542096	2540667	278572	277192	SPAC26H5.02c	SPBC211.06	SPAC26H5.02c	gfh1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436360	2542096	2540712	278572	277235	SPAC26H5.02c	SPBC216.02	SPAC26H5.02c	mcp5	-	mug21|num1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436361	2542096	2540629	278572	277155	SPAC26H5.02c	SPBC21D10.09c	SPAC26H5.02c	rkr1	-	SPBC21D10.09c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436362	2542096	2541011	278572	277526	SPAC26H5.02c	SPBC337.14	SPAC26H5.02c	rpb4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436363	2542096	2540929	278572	277445	SPAC26H5.02c	SPBC354.03	SPAC26H5.02c	swd3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436364	2542096	2541020	278572	277535	SPAC26H5.02c	SPBC354.04	SPAC26H5.02c	SPBC354.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436365	2542096	2541306	278572	277818	SPAC26H5.02c	SPBP16F5.07	SPAC26H5.02c	apm1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436366	2542096	2539189	278572	275760	SPAC26H5.02c	SPCC1682.16	SPAC26H5.02c	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436367	2542096	2539366	278572	275932	SPAC26H5.02c	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC26H5.02c	pef1	-	p31	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436368	2542096	2539109	278572	275681	SPAC26H5.02c	SPCC74.03c	SPAC26H5.02c	ssp2	-	ucp9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436369	2542701	2541735	279154	278229	SPAC26H5.05	SPAC7D4.04	mga2	atg11	SPAC26H5.05	taf1|cvt9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436370	2542701	2540249	279154	276781	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC32F12.08c	mga2	duo1	SPAC26H5.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436371	2542701	2540133	279154	276670	SPAC26H5.05	SPBC3B8.02	mga2	php5	SPAC26H5.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436372	2542698	2540095	279151	276633	SPAC26H5.09c	SPBC115.03	SPAC26H5.09c	SPBC115.03	-	SPBC839.18c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436373	2542694	2539832	279147	276381	SPAC26H5.10c	SPBC1271.04c	tif51	SPBC1271.04c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436374	2542080	2540580	278557	277106	SPAC27D7.03c	SPBC19C2.05	mei2	ran1	-	pat1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436375	2541617	2541617	278114	278114	SPAC27D7.04	SPAC27D7.04	omt2	omt2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436376	2541617	2542094	278114	278571	SPAC27D7.04	SPAC29B12.06c	omt2	rcd1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436377	2541617	2543517	278114	279935	SPAC27D7.04	SPAC3G9.05	omt2	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436378	2541617	2539928	278114	276472	SPAC27D7.04	SPBC1604.08c	omt2	imp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436379	2541617	2539426	278114	275991	SPAC27D7.04	SPCC962.03c	omt2	cut15	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436380	2542690	2540409	279143	276937	SPAC27D7.07c	SPBC2D10.11c	smd1	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436381	9407256	2542654	1028619	279108	SPAC27E2.14	SPAC8E11.05c	SPAC27E2.14	SPAC8E11.05c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436382	2541940	2541940	278427	278427	SPAC27F1.02c	SPAC27F1.02c	cdc8	cdc8	fus4	fus4	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436383	2541940	2541456	278427	277959	SPAC27F1.02c	SPAC6G9.04	cdc8	spo7	fus4	mug79	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436384	2541940	2539887	278427	276433	SPAC27F1.02c	SPBC13G1.09	cdc8	SPBC13G1.09	fus4	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436385	2541619	2539783	278116	276333	SPAC27F1.09c	SPBC1289.02c	prp10	uap2	sap155|SF3b155	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436386	2541619	2540462	278116	276990	SPAC27F1.09c	SPBC29A3.07c	prp10	sap14	sap155|SF3b155	sab14|SF3b14a	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436387	2542620	2540409	279074	276937	SPAC29A4.03c	SPBC2D10.11c	SPAC29A4.03c	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436388	2542413	2538952	278877	275526	SPAC29A4.07	SPCC1235.10c	srb6	sec6	med22	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436389	2542413	2539354	278877	275920	SPAC29A4.07	SPCC4F11.03c	srb6	SPCC4F11.03c	med22	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436390	2542256	2542256	278726	278726	SPAC29A4.08c	SPAC29A4.08c	prp19	prp19	cwf8	cwf8	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436391	2542251	2541193	278721	277707	SPAC29A4.09	SPBC776.02c	SPAC29A4.09	dis2	-	bws1|sds1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436392	2542306	2542619	278773	279073	SPAC29A4.11	SPAC6G10.02c	rga3	tea3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436393	2542306	2539785	278773	276335	SPAC29A4.11	SPBC1773.16c	rga3	SPBC1773.16c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436394	2542696	2541735	279149	278229	SPAC29B12.03	SPAC7D4.04	spd1	atg11	-	taf1|cvt9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436395	2542696	2540580	279149	277106	SPAC29B12.03	SPBC19C2.05	spd1	ran1	-	pat1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436396	2542696	2540931	279149	277447	SPAC29B12.03	SPBC365.07c	spd1	SPBC365.07c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436397	2542689	2542689	279142	279142	SPAC29B12.04	SPAC29B12.04	snz1	snz1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436398	2542689	2543517	279142	279935	SPAC29B12.04	SPAC3G9.05	snz1	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436399	2542689	2540070	279142	276608	SPAC29B12.04	SPBC119.04	snz1	mei3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436400	2542689	2539928	279142	276472	SPAC29B12.04	SPBC1604.08c	snz1	imp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436401	2542094	2542094	278571	278571	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC29B12.06c	rcd1	rcd1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436402	2542094	2539827	278571	276376	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC1861.02	rcd1	abp2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436403	2542094	2540778	278571	277297	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC19G7.10c	rcd1	SPBC19G7.10c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436404	2542094	2539531	278571	276093	SPAC29B12.06c	SPCC576.02	rcd1	SPCC576.02	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436405	2542669	2542426	279122	278888	SPAC29B12.08	SPAC31G5.01	clr5	sap49	SPAC29B12.08	SPAPB1A11.05|SF3b49	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436406	2542669	2543037	279122	279472	SPAC29B12.08	SPAC4G9.04c	clr5	pcf11	SPAC29B12.08	SPAC4G9.04c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436407	2542669	2541470	279122	277972	SPAC29B12.08	SPAPYUG7.04c	clr5	rpb9	SPAC29B12.08	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436408	2542669	2540637	279122	277163	SPAC29B12.08	SPBC29A10.02	clr5	spo5	SPAC29B12.08	SPBC365.18|mrb1|mug12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436409	2542669	2541033	279122	277548	SPAC29B12.08	SPBC3B9.21	clr5	dcp1	SPAC29B12.08	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436410	2542669	2541306	279122	277818	SPAC29B12.08	SPBP16F5.07	clr5	apm1	SPAC29B12.08	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436411	2542813	2543324	279260	279747	SPAC29B12.11c	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAC29B12.11c	vps17	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436412	2541667	2540494	278163	277022	SPAC29E6.04	SPBC409.04c	nnf1	mis12	SPAC30.08	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436413	2541572	2539204	278069	275774	SPAC2C4.12c	SPCC191.08	SPAC2C4.12c	SPCC191.08	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436414	2541473	2540635	277975	277161	SPAC2C4.14c	SPBC23G7.08c	ppk11	rga7	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436415	2541532	2541532	278032	278032	SPAC2C4.15c	SPAC2C4.15c	ubx2	ubx2	ucp13	ucp13	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436416	2541532	2543170	278032	279601	SPAC2C4.15c	SPAC343.09	ubx2	ubx3	ucp13	mug39	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436417	2541532	2539998	278032	276542	SPAC2C4.15c	SPBC16G5.03	ubx2	SPBC16G5.03	ucp13	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436418	2541491	2540409	277993	276937	SPAC2C4.16c	SPBC2D10.11c	rps801	nap2	rps8|rps8-1	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436419	2541888	2542702	278378	279155	SPAC2E12.02	SPAC8E11.01c	hsf1	SPAC8E11.01c	hsf|hstf	SPAC959.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436420	2541514	2543143	278015	279575	SPAC2E1P5.04c	SPAPB1A10.04c	cwg2	cwp1	orb7	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput|Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436421	2541476	2543622	277978	280036	SPAC2E1P5.05	SPAC4D7.09	rrp9	tif223	SPAC2E1P5.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436422	2541476	2540735	277978	277258	SPAC2E1P5.05	SPBC83.03c	rrp9	tas3	SPAC2E1P5.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436423	2541476	2538752	277978	275335	SPAC2E1P5.05	SPCC830.11c	rrp9	fap7	SPAC2E1P5.05	SPCC830.11c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436424	2541463	2543687	277965	280101	SPAC2F3.02	SPAC3C7.04	SPAC2F3.02	SPAC3C7.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436425	2541463	2543157	277965	279588	SPAC2F3.02	SPAC3F10.12c	SPAC2F3.02	SPAC3F10.12c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436426	2541463	2543580	277965	279995	SPAC2F3.02	SPAC644.14c	SPAC2F3.02	rad51	-	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436427	2541463	2539785	277965	276335	SPAC2F3.02	SPBC1773.16c	SPAC2F3.02	SPBC1773.16c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436428	2541958	2541054	278445	277569	SPAC2F3.05c	SPBC3B8.08	SPAC2F3.05c	SPBC3B8.08	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436429	2541725	2539581	278219	276140	SPAC2F3.10	SPCC965.03	vps54	vma8	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436430	3361430	2540778	280506	277297	SPAC2F3.12c	SPBC19G7.10c	plp1	SPBC19G7.10c	SPAC2F3.17c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436431	3361430	2540723	280506	277246	SPAC2F3.12c	SPBC20F10.09	plp1	lsm5	SPAC2F3.17c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436432	3361430	2540212	280506	276745	SPAC2F3.12c	SPBC9B6.05c	plp1	lsm3	SPAC2F3.17c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436433	3361430	2538804	280506	275385	SPAC2F3.12c	SPCC1620.01c	plp1	lsm2	SPAC2F3.17c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436434	3361430	2539322	280506	275888	SPAC2F3.12c	SPCC1840.10	plp1	lsm8	SPAC2F3.17c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436435	2541901	2540836	278391	277354	SPAC2F7.02c	SPBC18H10.19	SPAC2F7.02c	vps38	-	atg14	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436436	2541901	2541197	278391	277711	SPAC2F7.02c	SPBC839.12	SPAC2F7.02c	rpc31	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436437	2541901	2541358	278391	277869	SPAC2F7.02c	SPBP4H10.16c	SPAC2F7.02c	SPBP4H10.16c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436438	2541629	2540735	278125	277258	SPAC2F7.05c	SPBC83.03c	SPAC2F7.05c	tas3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436439	2541813	2539187	278304	275758	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC16C4.14c	rrp4	sfc4	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436440	2541620	2541620	278117	278117	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC2G11.12	rqh1	rqh1	hus2|rad12|rec9	hus2|rad12|rec9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436441	2541620	2543409	278117	279831	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC4D7.13	rqh1	usp104	hus2|rad12|rec9	prp40	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436442	2541620	2541456	278117	277959	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC6G9.04	rqh1	spo7	hus2|rad12|rec9	mug79	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436443	2541620	2541735	278117	278229	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC7D4.04	rqh1	atg11	hus2|rad12|rec9	taf1|cvt9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436444	2541620	2543290	278117	279715	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC9E9.10c	rqh1	cbh1	hus2|rad12|rec9	cbh	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436445	2541620	2539838	278117	276387	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC1347.10	rqh1	cdc23	hus2|rad12|rec9	mcm10	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436446	2541620	3361275	278117	280351	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC337.02c	rqh1	SPBC337.02c	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436447	2541620	2541158	278117	277673	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC660.13c	rqh1	ssb1	hus2|rad12|rec9	rad11|rpa1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436448	2541620	2539562	278117	276123	SPAC2G11.12	SPCC569.01c	rqh1	SPCC569.01c	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436449	2541620	2539593	278117	276151	SPAC2G11.12	SPCP20C8.01c	rqh1	SPCP20C8.01c	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436450	2541664	2541306	278160	277818	SPAC2H10.01	SPBP16F5.07	SPAC2H10.01	apm1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436451	2543070	2543290	279503	279715	SPAC2H10.02c	SPAC9E9.10c	SPAC2H10.02c	cbh1	-	cbh	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436452	2543070	2541346	279503	277857	SPAC2H10.02c	SPBP8B7.08c	SPAC2H10.02c	ppm1	-	SPBP8B7.08c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436453	2542107	2542107	278583	278583	SPAC30.01c	SPAC30.01c	sec72	sec72	sec7b|sec702	sec7b|sec702	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436454	2542236	2541713	278708	278208	SPAC30D11.08c	SPAC3A12.12	phf2	atp11	saf60|swp2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436455	2542236	2543517	278708	279935	SPAC30D11.08c	SPAC3G9.05	phf2	spa2	saf60|swp2	SPAC3G9.05	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436456	2542236	2543294	278708	279719	SPAC30D11.08c	SPAC6B12.16	phf2	meu26	saf60|swp2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436457	2542236	2543434	278708	279854	SPAC30D11.08c	SPAC8F11.02c	phf2	dph3	saf60|swp2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436458	2542236	2540580	278708	277106	SPAC30D11.08c	SPBC19C2.05	phf2	ran1	saf60|swp2	pat1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436459	2542236	2540328	278708	276858	SPAC30D11.08c	SPBC31F10.11c	phf2	cwf4	saf60|swp2	syf3	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436460	2542236	2541306	278708	277818	SPAC30D11.08c	SPBP16F5.07	phf2	apm1	saf60|swp2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436461	2543086	2543086	279519	279519	SPAC30D11.10	SPAC30D11.10	rad52	rad52	rad22|rad22A	rad22|rad22A	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436462	2543086	2543685	279519	280099	SPAC30D11.10	SPAC3C7.03c	rad52	rad55	rad22|rad22A	rhp55	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436463	2543086	2543580	279519	279995	SPAC30D11.10	SPAC644.14c	rad52	rad51	rad22|rad22A	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436464	2542249	2543409	278719	279831	SPAC30D11.14c	SPAC4D7.13	SPAC30D11.14c	usp104	-	prp40	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436465	2542249	2543286	278719	279711	SPAC30D11.14c	SPAC56F8.16	SPAC30D11.14c	esc1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436466	2542249	2543646	278719	280060	SPAC30D11.14c	SPAC821.07c	SPAC30D11.14c	moc3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436467	2542249	2539631	278719	276187	SPAC30D11.14c	SPBC16G5.16	SPAC30D11.14c	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436468	2542249	2540580	278719	277106	SPAC30D11.14c	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC30D11.14c	ran1	-	pat1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436469	2542249	2541323	278719	277835	SPAC30D11.14c	SPBP35G2.14	SPAC30D11.14c	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436470	2542249	2539454	278719	276017	SPAC30D11.14c	SPCC622.15c	SPAC30D11.14c	SPCC622.15c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436471	2543198	2543198	279627	279627	SPAC31A2.11c	SPAC31A2.11c	cuf1	cuf1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436472	2542940	2543473	279381	279893	SPAC31A2.12	SPAC513.06c	SPAC31A2.12	SPAC513.06c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436473	2542426	2539631	278888	276187	SPAC31G5.01	SPBC16G5.16	sap49	SPBC16G5.16	SPAPB1A11.05|SF3b49	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436474	2542426	2540580	278888	277106	SPAC31G5.01	SPBC19C2.05	sap49	ran1	SPAPB1A11.05|SF3b49	pat1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436475	2542426	2540350	278888	276879	SPAC31G5.01	SPBC317.01	sap49	mbx2	SPAPB1A11.05|SF3b49	pvg4	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436476	2542426	2540133	278888	276670	SPAC31G5.01	SPBC3B8.02	sap49	php5	SPAPB1A11.05|SF3b49	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436477	2542426	2539454	278888	276017	SPAC31G5.01	SPCC622.15c	sap49	SPCC622.15c	SPAPB1A11.05|SF3b49	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436478	2542474	2543209	278934	279638	SPAC31G5.09c	SPAC3G6.03c	spk1	SPAC3G6.03c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436479	2542474	2543646	278934	280060	SPAC31G5.09c	SPAC821.07c	spk1	moc3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436480	2542474	2542972	278934	279411	SPAC31G5.09c	SPAPYUG7.02c	spk1	sin1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436481	2543040	2540686	279475	277211	SPAC31G5.13	SPBC21D10.10	rpn11	bdc1	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436482	2543084	2543084	279517	279517	SPAC31G5.19	SPAC31G5.19	abo1	abo1	SPAC31G5.19	SPAC31G5.19	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436483	2543084	2543650	279517	280064	SPAC31G5.19	SPAC4F10.12	abo1	fta1	SPAC31G5.19	sma1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436484	2543084	2540003	279517	276547	SPAC31G5.19	SPBC1105.07c	abo1	SPBC1105.07c	SPAC31G5.19	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436485	2543101	2543101	279533	279533	SPAC323.03c	SPAC323.03c	SPAC323.03c	SPAC323.03c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436486	2543075	2543075	279508	279508	SPAC323.06c	SPAC323.06c	uba5	uba5	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436487	2543148	2541386	279580	277897	SPAC328.02	SPBP8B7.24c	dbl4	atg8	SPAC328.02	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436488	2543208	2543208	279637	279637	SPAC328.04	SPAC328.04	SPAC328.04	SPAC328.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436489	2543208	2541709	279637	278204	SPAC328.04	SPAC3C7.02c	SPAC328.04	pil2	-	SPAC3C7.02c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436490	2543208	2541456	279637	277959	SPAC328.04	SPAC6G9.04	SPAC328.04	spo7	-	mug79	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436491	2543208	2540186	279637	276719	SPAC328.04	SPBC13E7.02	SPAC328.04	cwf24	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436492	2543208	2540406	279637	276934	SPAC328.04	SPBC30D10.02	SPAC328.04	SPBC30D10.02	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436493	2543208	2540880	279637	277397	SPAC328.04	SPBC582.03	SPAC328.04	cdc13	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436494	2543208	2540838	279637	277356	SPAC328.04	SPBC609.01	SPAC328.04	SPBC609.01	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436495	2543208	2541281	279637	277794	SPAC328.04	SPBC902.04	SPAC328.04	rmn1	-	SPBC902.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436496	2543208	2541249	279637	277763	SPAC328.04	SPBC947.01	SPAC328.04	alf1	-	SPBC947.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436497	2543208	2539093	279637	275665	SPAC328.04	SPCC736.15	SPAC328.04	pil1	-	SPCC736.15	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436498	2542567	2543517	279023	279935	SPAC328.05	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC328.05	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436499	2542567	2543221	279023	279649	SPAC328.05	SPAC637.04	SPAC328.05	SPAC637.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436500	2542567	2541457	279023	277960	SPAC328.05	SPAC6G10.10c	SPAC328.05	SPAC6G10.10c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436501	2542567	2539618	279023	276176	SPAC328.05	SPBC15D4.12c	SPAC328.05	mug98	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436502	2542567	2539733	279023	276285	SPAC328.05	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC328.05	pab2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436503	2542567	2540475	279023	277003	SPAC328.05	SPBC30D10.06	SPAC328.05	lsm4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436504	2542567	2541133	279023	277648	SPAC328.05	SPBC660.05	SPAC328.05	SPBC660.05	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436505	2542567	2541216	279023	277730	SPAC328.05	SPBC776.09	SPAC328.05	ste13	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436506	2542567	2541130	279023	277645	SPAC328.05	SPBC776.11	SPAC328.05	rpl2801	-	rpl28-1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436507	2542567	2541290	279023	277803	SPAC328.05	SPBC9B6.06	SPAC328.05	mrpl10	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436508	2542567	2541306	279023	277818	SPAC328.05	SPBP16F5.07	SPAC328.05	apm1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436509	2542567	2539548	279023	276109	SPAC328.05	SPCC5E4.07	SPAC328.05	rpl2802	-	rpl28|rpl28-2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436510	2542059	2542059	278537	278537	SPAC328.06	SPAC328.06	ubp2	ubp2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436511	2543188	2542619	279617	279073	SPAC328.08c	SPAC6G10.02c	tbc1	tea3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436512	2543188	2543055	279617	279489	SPAC328.08c	SPAC806.06c	tbc1	SPAC806.06c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436513	2543188	2539631	279617	276187	SPAC328.08c	SPBC16G5.16	tbc1	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436514	2541712	2539906	278207	276452	SPAC328.10c	SPBC16G5.17	rps502	SPBC16G5.17	rps5-2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436515	2541712	2540409	278207	276937	SPAC328.10c	SPBC2D10.11c	rps502	nap2	rps5-2	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436516	2542405	2542478	278869	278938	SPAC32A11.03c	SPAC343.08c	phx1	mrp17	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436517	2543187	3361204	279616	280280	SPAC343.03	SPBP23A10.04	apc11	apc2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436518	2543165	2543165	279596	279596	SPAC343.07	SPAC343.07	mug28	mug28	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436519	2543170	2541050	279601	277565	SPAC343.09	SPBC428.05c	ubx3	arg12	mug39	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436520	2543105	2542993	279537	279431	SPAC343.10	SPAC56F8.10	met11	met9	mthfr2	met5	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436521	2541710	2543235	278205	279663	SPAC343.11c	SPAC56F8.04c	msc1	ppt1	-	coq2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436522	2541710	2543506	278205	279924	SPAC343.11c	SPAC637.12c	msc1	mst1	-	kat5	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436523	2541710	2543240	278205	279668	SPAC343.11c	SPAC694.06c	msc1	mrc1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436524	2541710	2541644	278205	278140	SPAC343.11c	SPAP11E10.01	msc1	SPAP11E10.01	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436525	2541710	2541584	278205	278081	SPAC343.11c	SPAP32A8.02	msc1	SPAP32A8.02	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436526	2541710	2539761	278205	276312	SPAC343.11c	SPBC16C6.09	msc1	ogm4	-	oma4	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436527	2541710	2541415	278205	277922	SPAC343.11c	SPBPB2B2.15	msc1	SPBPB2B2.15	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436528	2543035	2543580	279470	279995	SPAC343.14c	SPAC644.14c	SPAC343.14c	rad51	-	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436529	2543035	2543646	279470	280060	SPAC343.14c	SPAC821.07c	SPAC343.14c	moc3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436530	2543035	2543290	279470	279715	SPAC343.14c	SPAC9E9.10c	SPAC343.14c	cbh1	-	cbh	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436531	2543035	2539631	279470	276187	SPAC343.14c	SPBC16G5.16	SPAC343.14c	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436532	2543035	2539349	279470	275915	SPAC343.14c	SPCC613.11c	SPAC343.14c	meu23	-	B13958-2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436533	2543056	2543056	279490	279490	SPAC3A11.04	SPAC3A11.04	SPAC3A11.04	SPAC3A11.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436534	2543116	2539631	279548	276187	SPAC3A11.08	SPBC16G5.16	pcu4	SPBC16G5.16	Cul-4|cul4	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436535	2543106	2539781	279538	276331	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC106.10	SPAC3A11.13	pka1	SPAC3H5.02	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436536	2543106	2540095	279538	276633	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC115.03	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC115.03	SPAC3H5.02	SPBC839.18c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436537	2543106	2540664	279538	277189	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC215.02	SPAC3A11.13	bob1	SPAC3H5.02	gim5	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436538	2543106	2540725	279538	277248	SPAC3A11.13	SPBC215.14c	SPAC3A11.13	vps20	SPAC3H5.02	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436539	2542725	2540409	279176	276937	SPAC3A12.10	SPBC2D10.11c	rpl2001	nap2	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436540	2542531	2539730	278989	276282	SPAC3A12.11c	SPBC1861.08c	cwf2	lea1	prp3|cwc2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436541	2541713	2541709	278208	278204	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC3C7.02c	atp11	pil2	-	SPAC3C7.02c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436542	2541713	2543157	278208	279588	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC3F10.12c	atp11	SPAC3F10.12c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436543	2541713	2543580	278208	279995	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC644.14c	atp11	rad51	-	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436544	2541713	3361526	278208	280602	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC664.15	atp11	caf4	-	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436545	2541713	2542619	278208	279073	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC6G10.02c	atp11	tea3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436546	2541713	2541735	278208	278229	SPAC3A12.12	SPAC7D4.04	atp11	atg11	-	taf1|cvt9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436547	2541713	2539728	278208	276280	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC14F5.12c	atp11	cbh2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436548	2541713	2539631	278208	276187	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC16G5.16	atp11	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436549	2541713	2539906	278208	276452	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC16G5.17	atp11	SPBC16G5.17	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436550	2541713	2540409	278208	276937	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC2D10.11c	atp11	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436551	2541713	2540735	278208	277258	SPAC3A12.12	SPBC83.03c	atp11	tas3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436552	2541713	2538952	278208	275526	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC1235.10c	atp11	sec6	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436553	2541713	2539562	278208	276123	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC569.01c	atp11	SPCC569.01c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436554	2541713	2539093	278208	275665	SPAC3A12.12	SPCC736.15	atp11	pil1	-	SPCC736.15	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436555	2541709	2541709	278204	278204	SPAC3C7.02c	SPAC3C7.02c	pil2	pil2	SPAC3C7.02c	SPAC3C7.02c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436556	2541709	2543517	278204	279935	SPAC3C7.02c	SPAC3G9.05	pil2	spa2	SPAC3C7.02c	SPAC3G9.05	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436557	2541709	2543409	278204	279831	SPAC3C7.02c	SPAC4D7.13	pil2	usp104	SPAC3C7.02c	prp40	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436558	2541709	2539838	278204	276387	SPAC3C7.02c	SPBC1347.10	pil2	cdc23	SPAC3C7.02c	mcm10	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436559	2541709	2539928	278204	276472	SPAC3C7.02c	SPBC1604.08c	pil2	imp1	SPAC3C7.02c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436560	2541709	2540249	278204	276781	SPAC3C7.02c	SPBC32F12.08c	pil2	duo1	SPAC3C7.02c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436561	2541709	2541133	278204	277648	SPAC3C7.02c	SPBC660.05	pil2	SPBC660.05	SPAC3C7.02c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436562	2541709	2541216	278204	277730	SPAC3C7.02c	SPBC776.09	pil2	ste13	SPAC3C7.02c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436563	2541709	2541171	278204	277685	SPAC3C7.02c	SPBC887.09c	pil2	sog2	SPAC3C7.02c	SPBC887.09c|lrp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436564	2541709	2541235	278204	277749	SPAC3C7.02c	SPBC8D2.12c	pil2	SPBC8D2.12c	SPAC3C7.02c	pI053	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436565	2541709	2541281	278204	277794	SPAC3C7.02c	SPBC902.04	pil2	rmn1	SPAC3C7.02c	SPBC902.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436566	2541709	2539360	278204	275926	SPAC3C7.02c	SPCC613.04c	pil2	rng3	SPAC3C7.02c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436567	2543687	2539299	280101	275867	SPAC3C7.04	SPCC1672.07	SPAC3C7.04	SPCC1672.07	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436568	2543687	2539502	280101	276065	SPAC3C7.04	SPCC4G3.06c	SPAC3C7.04	mrpl4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436569	2543159	2540778	279590	277297	SPAC3C7.09	SPBC19G7.10c	set8	SPBC19G7.10c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436570	2543044	2543044	279479	279479	SPAC3C7.12	SPAC3C7.12	tip1	tip1	noc1	noc1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436571	2543044	2541456	279479	277959	SPAC3C7.12	SPAC6G9.04	tip1	spo7	noc1	mug79	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436572	2543044	2539857	279479	276404	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC1604.20c	tip1	tea2	noc1	klp4	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436573	2543044	2540303	279479	276833	SPAC3C7.12	SPBC354.01	tip1	gtp1	noc1	SPBC649.06	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436574	2543044	2539047	279479	275620	SPAC3C7.12	SPCC1223.06	tip1	tea1	noc1	alp8	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436575	2543207	2543207	279636	279636	SPAC3C7.13c	SPAC3C7.13c	SPAC3C7.13c	SPAC3C7.13c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436576	2543686	2543686	280100	280100	SPAC3C7.14c	SPAC3C7.14c	obr1	obr1	apt1|uhp1|p25	apt1|uhp1|p25	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436577	2543157	2543517	279588	279935	SPAC3F10.12c	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC3F10.12c	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436578	2543157	2543648	279588	280062	SPAC3F10.12c	SPAC4F10.09c	SPAC3F10.12c	SPAC4F10.09c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436579	2543157	2543221	279588	279649	SPAC3F10.12c	SPAC637.04	SPAC3F10.12c	SPAC637.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436580	2543157	2541456	279588	277959	SPAC3F10.12c	SPAC6G9.04	SPAC3F10.12c	spo7	-	mug79	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436581	2543157	2541735	279588	278229	SPAC3F10.12c	SPAC7D4.04	SPAC3F10.12c	atg11	-	taf1|cvt9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436582	2543157	2543085	279588	279518	SPAC3F10.12c	SPAC806.03c	SPAC3F10.12c	rps2601	-	rps26|rps26-1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436583	2543157	2543290	279588	279715	SPAC3F10.12c	SPAC9E9.10c	SPAC3F10.12c	cbh1	-	cbh	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436584	2543157	2539838	279588	276387	SPAC3F10.12c	SPBC1347.10	SPAC3F10.12c	cdc23	-	mcm10	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436585	2543157	2539887	279588	276433	SPAC3F10.12c	SPBC13G1.09	SPAC3F10.12c	SPBC13G1.09	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436586	2543157	2539740	279588	276292	SPAC3F10.12c	SPBC1685.04	SPAC3F10.12c	SPBC1685.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436587	2543157	3361342	279588	280418	SPAC3F10.12c	SPBC16D10.07c	SPAC3F10.12c	sir2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436588	2543157	2540801	279588	277320	SPAC3F10.12c	SPBC18H10.10c	SPAC3F10.12c	saf4	-	cwc16|cwf16	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436589	2543157	2540667	279588	277192	SPAC3F10.12c	SPBC211.06	SPAC3F10.12c	gfh1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436590	2543157	2540712	279588	277235	SPAC3F10.12c	SPBC216.02	SPAC3F10.12c	mcp5	-	mug21|num1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436591	2543157	2540406	279588	276934	SPAC3F10.12c	SPBC30D10.02	SPAC3F10.12c	SPBC30D10.02	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436592	2543157	2541020	279588	277535	SPAC3F10.12c	SPBC354.04	SPAC3F10.12c	SPBC354.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436593	2543157	2541033	279588	277548	SPAC3F10.12c	SPBC3B9.21	SPAC3F10.12c	dcp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436594	2543157	2540892	279588	277408	SPAC3F10.12c	SPBC530.01	SPAC3F10.12c	gyp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436595	2543157	2541068	279588	277583	SPAC3F10.12c	SPBC530.11c	SPAC3F10.12c	SPBC530.11c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436596	2543157	2541184	279588	277698	SPAC3F10.12c	SPBC725.17c	SPAC3F10.12c	rrn11	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436597	2543157	2541281	279588	277794	SPAC3F10.12c	SPBC902.04	SPAC3F10.12c	rmn1	-	SPBC902.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436598	2543157	2541249	279588	277763	SPAC3F10.12c	SPBC947.01	SPAC3F10.12c	alf1	-	SPBC947.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436599	2543157	2541306	279588	277818	SPAC3F10.12c	SPBP16F5.07	SPAC3F10.12c	apm1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436600	2543157	2541368	279588	277879	SPAC3F10.12c	SPBP4H10.21c	SPAC3F10.12c	sld5	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436601	2543157	2539050	279588	275623	SPAC3F10.12c	SPCC11E10.08	SPAC3F10.12c	rik1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436602	2543157	2539366	279588	275932	SPAC3F10.12c	SPCC16C4.11	SPAC3F10.12c	pef1	-	p31	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436603	2543157	2538916	279588	275493	SPAC3F10.12c	SPCC16C4.17	SPAC3F10.12c	mug123	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436604	2543157	2539360	279588	275926	SPAC3F10.12c	SPCC613.04c	SPAC3F10.12c	rng3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436605	2543058	2540003	279492	276547	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC1105.07c	rpn15	SPBC1105.07c	dss1|sem1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436606	2543058	2541068	279492	277583	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC530.11c	rpn15	SPBC530.11c	dss1|sem1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436607	2543209	2543209	279638	279638	SPAC3G6.03c	SPAC3G6.03c	SPAC3G6.03c	SPAC3G6.03c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436608	2543209	2541306	279638	277818	SPAC3G6.03c	SPBP16F5.07	SPAC3G6.03c	apm1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436609	2542965	2543426	279405	279846	SPAC3G6.04	SPAC631.02	rnp24	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436610	2543067	2543067	279500	279500	SPAC3G6.07	SPAC3G6.07	SPAC3G6.07	SPAC3G6.07	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436611	2543067	2543409	279500	279831	SPAC3G6.07	SPAC4D7.13	SPAC3G6.07	usp104	-	prp40	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436612	2543067	2543607	279500	280022	SPAC3G6.07	SPAC4F8.07c	SPAC3G6.07	hxk2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436613	2543067	2543337	279500	279760	SPAC3G6.07	SPAC959.08	SPAC3G6.07	rpl2102	-	rpl21|rpl21-2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436614	2543067	3361466	279500	280542	SPAC3G6.07	SPAC959.10	SPAC3G6.07	sen15	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436615	2543067	2539717	279500	276270	SPAC3G6.07	SPBC15D4.08c	SPAC3G6.07	SPBC15D4.08c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436616	2543067	2541362	279500	277873	SPAC3G6.07	SPBP8B7.05c	SPAC3G6.07	nce103	-	SPBP8B7.05c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436617	2543067	2539204	279500	275774	SPAC3G6.07	SPCC191.08	SPAC3G6.07	SPCC191.08	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436618	2543067	2538895	279500	275473	SPAC3G6.07	SPCC830.09c	SPAC3G6.07	pop5	-	SPCC830.09c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436619	3361470	2541735	280546	278229	SPAC3G9.01	SPAC7D4.04	nsk1	atg11	-	taf1|cvt9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436620	2543517	2543377	279935	279799	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC3H1.07	spa2	aru1	SPAC3G9.05	car3	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436621	2543517	2541505	279935	278007	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC57A7.04c	spa2	pabp	SPAC3G9.05	pab1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436622	2543517	2542621	279935	279075	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC5H10.05c	spa2	SPAC5H10.05c	SPAC3G9.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436623	2543517	2542731	279935	279181	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC5H10.09c	spa2	SPAC5H10.09c	SPAC3G9.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436624	2543517	2543580	279935	279995	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC644.14c	spa2	rad51	SPAC3G9.05	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436625	2543517	3361526	279935	280602	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC664.15	spa2	caf4	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436626	2543517	2542733	279935	279183	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC6F12.04	spa2	SPAC6F12.04	SPAC3G9.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436627	2543517	2543032	279935	279468	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC6F12.05c	spa2	tnr3	SPAC3G9.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436628	2543517	2542619	279935	279073	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC6G10.02c	spa2	tea3	SPAC3G9.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436629	2543517	2541735	279935	278229	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC7D4.04	spa2	atg11	SPAC3G9.05	taf1|cvt9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436630	2543517	2543055	279935	279489	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC806.06c	spa2	SPAC806.06c	SPAC3G9.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436631	2543517	2543111	279935	279543	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC806.07	spa2	ndk1	SPAC3G9.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436632	2543517	2543646	279935	280060	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC821.07c	spa2	moc3	SPAC3G9.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436633	2543517	2542106	279935	278582	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC8E11.03c	spa2	dmc1	SPAC3G9.05	dmp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436634	2543517	2543290	279935	279715	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC9E9.10c	spa2	cbh1	SPAC3G9.05	cbh	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436635	2543517	2539832	279935	276381	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC1271.04c	spa2	SPBC1271.04c	SPAC3G9.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436636	2543517	2540159	279935	276694	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC12C2.08	spa2	dnm1	SPAC3G9.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436637	2543517	2539914	279935	276458	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC12D12.01	spa2	sad1	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC16H5.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436638	2543517	2539728	279935	276280	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC14F5.12c	spa2	cbh2	SPAC3G9.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436639	2543517	2539717	279935	276270	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC15D4.08c	spa2	SPBC15D4.08c	SPAC3G9.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436640	2543517	2539740	279935	276292	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC1685.04	spa2	SPBC1685.04	SPAC3G9.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436641	2543517	2539631	279935	276187	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC16G5.16	spa2	SPBC16G5.16	SPAC3G9.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436642	2543517	2539851	279935	276399	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC1734.03	spa2	SPBC1734.03	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC337.19	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436643	2543517	2539827	279935	276376	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC1861.02	spa2	abp2	SPAC3G9.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436644	2543517	2540580	279935	277106	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC19C2.05	spa2	ran1	SPAC3G9.05	pat1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436645	2543517	2540778	279935	277297	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC19G7.10c	spa2	SPBC19G7.10c	SPAC3G9.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436646	2543517	2540725	279935	277248	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC215.14c	spa2	vps20	SPAC3G9.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436647	2543517	2540526	279935	277054	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC26H8.01	spa2	thi2	SPAC3G9.05	nmt2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436648	2543517	2540315	279935	276845	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC2F12.14c	spa2	gua1	SPAC3G9.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436649	2543517	2540350	279935	276879	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC317.01	spa2	mbx2	SPAC3G9.05	pvg4	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436650	2543517	3361269	279935	280345	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC31A8.01c	spa2	rtn1	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436651	2543517	2540256	279935	276787	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC32F12.12c	spa2	SPBC32F12.12c	SPAC3G9.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436652	2543517	2540051	279935	276589	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC32H8.12c	spa2	act1	SPAC3G9.05	cps8|pi012	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436653	2543517	2540133	279935	276670	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC3B8.02	spa2	php5	SPAC3G9.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436654	2543517	2541054	279935	277569	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC3B8.08	spa2	SPBC3B8.08	SPAC3G9.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436655	2543517	2541125	279935	277640	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC409.13	spa2	rib4	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC409.13	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436656	2543517	2540735	279935	277258	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC83.03c	spa2	tas3	SPAC3G9.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436657	2543517	2541264	279935	277778	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC902.06	spa2	mto2	SPAC3G9.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436658	2543517	2541362	279935	277873	SPAC3G9.05	SPBP8B7.05c	spa2	nce103	SPAC3G9.05	SPBP8B7.05c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436659	2543517	2539062	279935	275634	SPAC3G9.05	SPCC126.10	spa2	iah1	SPAC3G9.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436660	2543517	2538967	279935	275541	SPAC3G9.05	SPCC330.04c	spa2	mug135	SPAC3G9.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436661	2543517	2539562	279935	276123	SPAC3G9.05	SPCC569.01c	spa2	SPCC569.01c	SPAC3G9.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436662	2543517	2539531	279935	276093	SPAC3G9.05	SPCC576.02	spa2	SPCC576.02	SPAC3G9.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436663	2543517	2539500	279935	276063	SPAC3G9.05	SPCC61.03	spa2	SPCC61.03	SPAC3G9.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436664	2543517	2539349	279935	275915	SPAC3G9.05	SPCC613.11c	spa2	meu23	SPAC3G9.05	B13958-2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436665	2543517	2539093	279935	275665	SPAC3G9.05	SPCC736.15	spa2	pil1	SPAC3G9.05	SPCC736.15	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436666	2543517	2539434	279935	275997	SPAC3G9.05	SPCC757.09c	spa2	rnc1	SPAC3G9.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436667	2543517	2539171	279935	275742	SPAC3G9.05	SPCC830.08c	spa2	yop1	SPAC3G9.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436668	2543517	2539573	279935	276133	SPAC3G9.05	SPCC965.06	spa2	osr2	SPAC3G9.05	SPCC965.06	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436669	2543517	2539593	279935	276151	SPAC3G9.05	SPCP20C8.01c	spa2	SPCP20C8.01c	SPAC3G9.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436670	2543454	2541735	279874	278229	SPAC3G9.08	SPAC7D4.04	png1	atg11	-	taf1|cvt9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436671	2543451	2543451	279871	279871	SPAC3G9.10c	SPAC3G9.10c	rrp41	rrp41	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436672	2543451	2540412	279871	276940	SPAC3G9.10c	SPBC211.08c	rrp41	mtr3	-	SPBC211.08c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436673	2543451	2540661	279871	277186	SPAC3G9.10c	SPBC23E6.03c	rrp41	nta1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436674	2543451	2538953	279871	275527	SPAC3G9.10c	SPCC285.08	rrp41	ret2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436675	2543451	2539341	279871	275907	SPAC3G9.10c	SPCC622.10c	rrp41	sec5	-	SPCC622.10c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436676	2543451	2539106	279871	275678	SPAC3G9.10c	SPCC757.08	rrp41	rrp45	-	SPCC757.08	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436677	2543421	2543421	279843	279843	SPAC3G9.14	SPAC3G9.14	sak1	sak1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436678	2543421	2539717	279843	276270	SPAC3G9.14	SPBC15D4.08c	sak1	SPBC15D4.08c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436679	2543377	2543377	279799	279799	SPAC3H1.07	SPAC3H1.07	aru1	aru1	car3	car3	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436680	2543377	2539928	279799	276472	SPAC3H1.07	SPBC1604.08c	aru1	imp1	car3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436681	2543377	2540661	279799	277186	SPAC3H1.07	SPBC23E6.03c	aru1	nta1	car3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436682	2543377	2541313	279799	277825	SPAC3H1.07	SPBP26C9.02c	aru1	car1	car3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436683	2543440	2542733	279860	279183	SPAC3H1.13	SPAC6F12.04	ppk13	SPAC6F12.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436684	2543440	3361269	279860	280345	SPAC3H1.13	SPBC31A8.01c	ppk13	rtn1	-	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436685	2543440	2539171	279860	275742	SPAC3H1.13	SPCC830.08c	ppk13	yop1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436686	2540817	2538752	277335	275335	SPAC3H5.05c	SPCC830.11c	rps1401	fap7	rps14|rps14-1	SPCC830.11c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436687	2543460	2540409	279880	276937	SPAC3H5.10	SPBC2D10.11c	rpl3202	nap2	rpl32|rpl32-2	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436688	2543634	2543634	280048	280048	SPAC3H8.04	SPAC3H8.04	SPAC3H8.04	SPAC3H8.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436689	2543639	2541265	280053	277779	SPAC458.03	SPBP16F5.03c	tel2	tra1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436690	2543576	2543545	279991	279962	SPAC4A8.05c	SPAC926.03	myp2	rlc1	myo3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436691	2543616	2538952	280030	275526	SPAC4A8.09c	SPCC1235.10c	cwf21	sec6	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436692	2543597	2541287	280012	277800	SPAC4A8.12c	SPBP22H7.05c	sds22	abo2	-	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436693	2543626	2543626	280040	280040	SPAC4D7.08c	SPAC4D7.08c	ade4	ade4	aza1|min13	aza1|min13	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436694	2543626	3361526	280040	280602	SPAC4D7.08c	SPAC664.15	ade4	caf4	aza1|min13	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436695	2543626	2541735	280040	278229	SPAC4D7.08c	SPAC7D4.04	ade4	atg11	aza1|min13	taf1|cvt9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436696	2543622	2543622	280036	280036	SPAC4D7.09	SPAC4D7.09	tif223	tif223	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436697	2543622	2542017	280036	278500	SPAC4D7.09	SPAC8C9.15c	tif223	tif225	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436698	2543409	2543409	279831	279831	SPAC4D7.13	SPAC4D7.13	usp104	usp104	prp40	prp40	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436699	2543409	3361526	279831	280602	SPAC4D7.13	SPAC664.15	usp104	caf4	prp40	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436700	2543409	2542619	279831	279073	SPAC4D7.13	SPAC6G10.02c	usp104	tea3	prp40	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436701	2543409	2543646	279831	280060	SPAC4D7.13	SPAC821.07c	usp104	moc3	prp40	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436702	2543409	2543382	279831	279804	SPAC4D7.13	SPAC890.02c	usp104	alp7	prp40	mia1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436703	2543409	2539631	279831	276187	SPAC4D7.13	SPBC16G5.16	usp104	SPBC16G5.16	prp40	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436704	2543409	2540306	279831	276836	SPAC4D7.13	SPBC2G5.02c	usp104	ckb2	prp40	SPBC2G5.02c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436705	2543409	2540350	279831	276879	SPAC4D7.13	SPBC317.01	usp104	mbx2	prp40	pvg4	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436706	2543409	2540735	279831	277258	SPAC4D7.13	SPBC83.03c	usp104	tas3	prp40	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436707	2543409	2541264	279831	277778	SPAC4D7.13	SPBC902.06	usp104	mto2	prp40	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436708	2543409	2541287	279831	277800	SPAC4D7.13	SPBP22H7.05c	usp104	abo2	prp40	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436709	2543425	2543401	279845	279823	SPAC4F10.07c	SPAPB1A11.03	atg13	SPAPB1A11.03	apg13|mug78	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436710	2543648	2542619	280062	279073	SPAC4F10.09c	SPAC6G10.02c	SPAC4F10.09c	tea3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436711	2543648	2543290	280062	279715	SPAC4F10.09c	SPAC9E9.10c	SPAC4F10.09c	cbh1	-	cbh	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436712	2543648	2540409	280062	276937	SPAC4F10.09c	SPBC2D10.11c	SPAC4F10.09c	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436713	2543648	2540735	280062	277258	SPAC4F10.09c	SPBC83.03c	SPAC4F10.09c	tas3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436714	2543648	2541287	280062	277800	SPAC4F10.09c	SPBP22H7.05c	SPAC4F10.09c	abo2	-	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436715	2543648	2538942	280062	275517	SPAC4F10.09c	SPCC1795.05c	SPAC4F10.09c	SPCC1795.05c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436716	2543516	2543513	279934	279931	SPAC4F10.11	SPAC821.06	spn1	spn2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436717	2543650	2541321	280064	277833	SPAC4F10.12	SPBP22H7.09c	fta1	mis15	sma1	pi022|SPACTOKYO_453.12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436718	2543589	2540100	280004	276638	SPAC4F10.15c	SPBC13E7.09	wsp1	vrp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436719	2543523	2543523	279941	279941	SPAC4F10.16c	SPAC4F10.16c	SPAC4F10.16c	SPAC4F10.16c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436720	2543528	2539093	279946	275665	SPAC4F10.17	SPCC736.15	SPAC4F10.17	pil1	-	SPCC736.15	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436721	2543592	2540505	280007	277033	SPAC4F10.18	SPBC3B9.16c	nup37	nup120	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436722	2543613	2539890	280027	276436	SPAC4F10.19c	SPBC16C6.03c	SPAC4F10.19c	SPBC16C6.03c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436723	2543614	2540409	280028	276937	SPAC4F8.06	SPBC2D10.11c	SPAC4F8.06	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436724	2543607	2541938	280022	278425	SPAC4F8.07c	SPAC8C9.16c	hxk2	mug63	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436725	2543129	2541699	279561	278195	SPAC4F8.13c	SPAP8A3.08	rng2	cdc4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436726	2543684	2541735	280098	278229	SPAC4G8.03c	SPAC7D4.04	SPAC4G8.03c	atg11	-	taf1|cvt9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436727	2543572	2540700	279987	277224	SPAC4G8.04	SPBC21C3.16c	SPAC4G8.04	spt4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436728	2543037	2543462	279472	279882	SPAC4G9.04c	SPAC644.16	pcf11	SPAC644.16	SPAC4G9.04c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436729	2543037	3361526	279472	280602	SPAC4G9.04c	SPAC664.15	pcf11	caf4	SPAC4G9.04c	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436730	2543037	2542880	279472	279325	SPAC4G9.04c	SPAC6F12.14	pcf11	cut23	SPAC4G9.04c	apc8	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436731	2543037	2541756	279472	278250	SPAC4G9.04c	SPAC8C9.14	pcf11	prr1	SPAC4G9.04c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436732	2543037	2539631	279472	276187	SPAC4G9.04c	SPBC16G5.16	pcf11	SPBC16G5.16	SPAC4G9.04c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436733	2543037	2539785	279472	276335	SPAC4G9.04c	SPBC1773.16c	pcf11	SPBC1773.16c	SPAC4G9.04c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436734	2543037	2540350	279472	276879	SPAC4G9.04c	SPBC317.01	pcf11	mbx2	SPAC4G9.04c	pvg4	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436735	2543037	2541296	279472	277808	SPAC4G9.04c	SPBP8B7.06	pcf11	rpp201	SPAC4G9.04c	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436736	2543380	3361526	279802	280602	SPAC4G9.16c	SPAC664.15	rpl901	caf4	rpl9-1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436737	2543366	2543366	279788	279788	SPAC4H3.08	SPAC4H3.08	SPAC4H3.08	SPAC4H3.08	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436738	2543554	2543554	279971	279971	SPAC4H3.11c	SPAC4H3.11c	ppc89	ppc89	mug127	mug127	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436739	2543554	2541456	279971	277959	SPAC4H3.11c	SPAC6G9.04	ppc89	spo7	mug127	mug79	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436740	2543554	2540718	279971	277241	SPAC4H3.11c	SPBC3H7.15	ppc89	hhp1	mug127	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436741	2543554	2540880	279971	277397	SPAC4H3.11c	SPBC582.03	ppc89	cdc13	mug127	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436742	2543554	2541306	279971	277818	SPAC4H3.11c	SPBP16F5.07	ppc89	apm1	mug127	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436743	2543473	2543473	279893	279893	SPAC513.06c	SPAC513.06c	SPAC513.06c	SPAC513.06c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436744	2543473	2543290	279893	279715	SPAC513.06c	SPAC9E9.10c	SPAC513.06c	cbh1	-	cbh	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436745	2543342	2541735	279765	278229	SPAC521.04c	SPAC7D4.04	sst1	atg11	SPAC521.04c	taf1|cvt9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436746	2543342	2539914	279765	276458	SPAC521.04c	SPBC12D12.01	sst1	sad1	SPAC521.04c	SPBC16H5.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436747	2543354	2540409	279776	276937	SPAC521.05	SPBC2D10.11c	rps802	nap2	rps8-2	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436748	2543350	2543350	279772	279772	SPAC56E4.03	SPAC56E4.03	SPAC56E4.03	SPAC56E4.03	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436749	2543329	3361526	279752	280602	SPAC56F8.02	SPAC664.15	SPAC56F8.02	caf4	-	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436750	2543329	2543646	279752	280060	SPAC56F8.02	SPAC821.07c	SPAC56F8.02	moc3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436751	2543245	2543245	279673	279673	SPAC56F8.06c	SPAC56F8.06c	alg10	alg10	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436752	2543286	2543286	279711	279711	SPAC56F8.16	SPAC56F8.16	esc1	esc1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436753	2543019	2538988	279455	275562	SPAC57A10.03	SPCC188.11	cyp1	prp45	cyp2	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436754	2542914	2540917	279356	277433	SPAC57A10.05c	SPBC409.05	pof1	skp1	-	psh1|sph1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436755	2542893	2542893	279337	279337	SPAC57A7.05	SPAC57A7.05	SPAC57A7.05	SPAC57A7.05	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436756	2542526	2542526	278984	278984	SPAC57A7.13	SPAC57A7.13	SPAC57A7.13	SPAC57A7.13	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436757	2542526	2539818	278984	276368	SPAC57A7.13	SPBC11C11.08	SPAC57A7.13	srp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436758	2542526	2538748	278984	275331	SPAC57A7.13	SPCC16A11.04	SPAC57A7.13	snx12	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436759	2542416	3361337	278880	280413	SPAC589.03c	SPBC1105.01	SPAC589.03c	rrp12	-	SPBPB7E8.03	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436760	2542489	2542102	278948	278578	SPAC589.08c	SPAC8C9.17c	dam1	spc34	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436761	2542489	2540249	278948	276781	SPAC589.08c	SPBC32F12.08c	dam1	duo1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436762	2542489	2540211	278948	276744	SPAC589.08c	SPBC947.15c	dam1	nde1	-	SPBC947.15c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436763	2542138	2539956	278614	276500	SPAC589.10c	SPBC16E9.11c	SPAC589.10c	pub3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436764	2541799	2539928	278290	276472	SPAC5H10.02c	SPBC1604.08c	hsp3102	imp1	SPAC5H10.02c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436765	2542621	2542621	279075	279075	SPAC5H10.05c	SPAC5H10.05c	SPAC5H10.05c	SPAC5H10.05c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436766	2542714	2539943	279167	276487	SPAC5H10.06c	SPBC14F5.05c	adh4	sam1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436767	2541618	2541618	278115	278115	SPAC5H10.08c	SPAC5H10.08c	pan6	pan6	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436768	2541618	2540686	278115	277211	SPAC5H10.08c	SPBC21D10.10	pan6	bdc1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436769	2542731	2542731	279181	279181	SPAC5H10.09c	SPAC5H10.09c	SPAC5H10.09c	SPAC5H10.09c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436770	2542731	2539928	279181	276472	SPAC5H10.09c	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC5H10.09c	imp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436771	2542731	2540686	279181	277211	SPAC5H10.09c	SPBC21D10.10	SPAC5H10.09c	bdc1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436772	2541724	2540409	278218	276937	SPAC5H10.12c	SPBC2D10.11c	SPAC5H10.12c	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436773	2543169	2539349	279600	275915	SPAC607.06c	SPCC613.11c	SPAC607.06c	meu23	-	B13958-2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436774	2543426	2543426	279846	279846	SPAC631.02	SPAC631.02	bdf2	bdf2	SPAC631.02|nrc1	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436775	2543426	2540931	279846	277447	SPAC631.02	SPBC365.07c	bdf2	SPBC365.07c	SPAC631.02|nrc1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436776	2543221	2543580	279649	279995	SPAC637.04	SPAC644.14c	SPAC637.04	rad51	-	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436777	2543221	3361526	279649	280602	SPAC637.04	SPAC664.15	SPAC637.04	caf4	-	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436778	2543221	2542619	279649	279073	SPAC637.04	SPAC6G10.02c	SPAC637.04	tea3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436779	2543221	2543382	279649	279804	SPAC637.04	SPAC890.02c	SPAC637.04	alp7	-	mia1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436780	2543221	2542106	279649	278582	SPAC637.04	SPAC8E11.03c	SPAC637.04	dmc1	-	dmp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436781	2543221	2543290	279649	279715	SPAC637.04	SPAC9E9.10c	SPAC637.04	cbh1	-	cbh	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436782	2543221	2539914	279649	276458	SPAC637.04	SPBC12D12.01	SPAC637.04	sad1	-	SPBC16H5.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436783	2543221	2539728	279649	276280	SPAC637.04	SPBC14F5.12c	SPAC637.04	cbh2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436784	2543221	2539631	279649	276187	SPAC637.04	SPBC16G5.16	SPAC637.04	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436785	2543221	2540409	279649	276937	SPAC637.04	SPBC2D10.11c	SPAC637.04	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436786	2543221	2540735	279649	277258	SPAC637.04	SPBC83.03c	SPAC637.04	tas3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436787	2543221	2541287	279649	277800	SPAC637.04	SPBP22H7.05c	SPAC637.04	abo2	-	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436788	2543221	2539149	279649	275721	SPAC637.04	SPCC1739.11c	SPAC637.04	cdc11	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436789	2543221	2539349	279649	275915	SPAC637.04	SPCC613.11c	SPAC637.04	meu23	-	B13958-2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436790	2543412	2538952	279834	275526	SPAC637.07	SPCC1235.10c	moe1	sec6	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436791	2543682	2543682	280096	280096	SPAC637.10c	SPAC637.10c	rpn10	rpn10	pus1	pus1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436792	2543506	2539428	279924	275993	SPAC637.12c	SPCC830.05c	mst1	epl1	kat5	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436793	2543661	2543661	280075	280075	SPAC644.08	SPAC644.08	SPAC644.08	SPAC644.08	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436794	2543580	2543580	279995	279995	SPAC644.14c	SPAC644.14c	rad51	rad51	rhp51	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436795	2543580	2541456	279995	277959	SPAC644.14c	SPAC6G9.04	rad51	spo7	rhp51	mug79	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436796	2543580	2540070	279995	276608	SPAC644.14c	SPBC119.04	rad51	mei3	rhp51	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436797	2543580	2539838	279995	276387	SPAC644.14c	SPBC1347.10	rad51	cdc23	rhp51	mcm10	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436798	2543580	2540727	279995	277250	SPAC644.14c	SPBC1921.03c	rad51	mex67	rhp51	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436799	2543580	2540580	279995	277106	SPAC644.14c	SPBC19C2.05	rad51	ran1	rhp51	pat1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436800	2543580	2540584	279995	277110	SPAC644.14c	SPBC28F2.07	rad51	sfr1	rhp51	dds20|mug13	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436801	2543580	2540394	279995	276922	SPAC644.14c	SPBC2D10.09	rad51	snr1	rhp51	SPBC2D10.09	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436802	2543580	2540475	279995	277003	SPAC644.14c	SPBC30D10.06	rad51	lsm4	rhp51	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436803	2543580	2540350	279995	276879	SPAC644.14c	SPBC317.01	rad51	mbx2	rhp51	pvg4	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436804	2543580	2540249	279995	276781	SPAC644.14c	SPBC32F12.08c	rad51	duo1	rhp51	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436805	2543580	2540880	279995	277397	SPAC644.14c	SPBC582.03	rad51	cdc13	rhp51	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436806	2543580	2541133	279995	277648	SPAC644.14c	SPBC660.05	rad51	SPBC660.05	rhp51	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436807	2543580	2541216	279995	277730	SPAC644.14c	SPBC776.09	rad51	ste13	rhp51	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436808	2543580	2538916	279995	275493	SPAC644.14c	SPCC16C4.17	rad51	mug123	rhp51	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436809	2543580	2538994	279995	275568	SPAC644.14c	SPCC553.01c	rad51	dbl2	rhp51	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436810	2543462	2541600	279882	278097	SPAC644.16	SPAC6F12.17	SPAC644.16	rna14	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436811	2543462	2540133	279882	276670	SPAC644.16	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC644.16	php5	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436812	2543553	2540409	279970	276937	SPAC664.05	SPBC2D10.11c	rpl13	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436813	3361526	3361526	280602	280602	SPAC664.15	SPAC664.15	caf4	caf4	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436814	3361526	2542427	280602	278889	SPAC664.15	SPAC6F6.12	caf4	SPAC6F6.12	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436815	3361526	2541456	280602	277959	SPAC664.15	SPAC6G9.04	caf4	spo7	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	mug79	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436816	3361526	2542052	280602	278531	SPAC664.15	SPAC823.15	caf4	ppa1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436817	3361526	2543434	280602	279854	SPAC664.15	SPAC8F11.02c	caf4	dph3	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436818	3361526	2543289	280602	279714	SPAC664.15	SPAC9E9.08	caf4	rad26	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436819	3361526	2542472	280602	278933	SPAC664.15	SPAC9E9.13	caf4	wos2	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436820	3361526	2543653	280602	280067	SPAC664.15	SPAPB1E7.10	caf4	rpc17	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436821	3361526	2539669	280602	276224	SPAC664.15	SPBC11C11.04c	caf4	alp1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436822	3361526	2539838	280602	276387	SPAC664.15	SPBC1347.10	caf4	cdc23	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	mcm10	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436823	3361526	2539887	280602	276433	SPAC664.15	SPBC13G1.09	caf4	SPBC13G1.09	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436824	3361526	2540094	280602	276632	SPAC664.15	SPBC146.10	caf4	mug57	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436825	3361526	2539740	280602	276292	SPAC664.15	SPBC1685.04	caf4	SPBC1685.04	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436826	3361526	2539623	280602	276180	SPAC664.15	SPBC16A3.09c	caf4	ufd1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436827	3361526	3361342	280602	280418	SPAC664.15	SPBC16D10.07c	caf4	sir2	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436828	3361526	2540072	280602	276610	SPAC664.15	SPBC16H5.07c	caf4	ppa2	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436829	3361526	2539619	280602	276177	SPAC664.15	SPBC23G7.09	caf4	mat1-Mc	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	matmc_2|matmc|mat1Mc|matmc_1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436830	3361526	2540179	280602	276712	SPAC664.15	SPBC1773.08c	caf4	omh4	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436831	3361526	2539963	280602	276507	SPAC664.15	SPBC17F3.02	caf4	nak1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	mor4|orb3	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436832	3361526	2540833	280602	277351	SPAC664.15	SPBC18H10.20c	caf4	any1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436833	3361526	2540775	280602	277295	SPAC664.15	SPBC19G7.15	caf4	nup44	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436834	3361526	2540784	280602	277303	SPAC664.15	SPBC211.04c	caf4	mcm6	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	mis5	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436835	3361526	2540738	280602	277261	SPAC664.15	SPBC211.07c	caf4	ubc8	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436836	3361526	2540629	280602	277155	SPAC664.15	SPBC21D10.09c	caf4	rkr1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	SPBC21D10.09c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436837	3361526	2540686	280602	277211	SPAC664.15	SPBC21D10.10	caf4	bdc1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436838	3361526	2540464	280602	276992	SPAC664.15	SPBC23E6.02	caf4	rrp2	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	SPBC23E6.02	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436839	3361526	2540632	280602	277158	SPAC664.15	SPBC28F2.09	caf4	toa1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436840	3361526	2540554	280602	277081	SPAC664.15	SPBC29A10.03c	caf4	pcf1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	SPBC365.19c|rlf2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436841	3361526	2540543	280602	277070	SPAC664.15	SPBC29A10.06c	caf4	ely5	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436842	3361526	2540462	280602	276990	SPAC664.15	SPBC29A3.07c	caf4	sap14	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	sab14|SF3b14a	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436843	3361526	2540341	280602	276870	SPAC664.15	SPBC2F12.11c	caf4	rep2	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436844	3361526	2540236	280602	276768	SPAC664.15	SPBC336.09c	caf4	rrn7	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436845	3361526	2540954	280602	277470	SPAC664.15	SPBC337.13c	caf4	gtr1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436846	3361526	2541011	280602	277526	SPAC664.15	SPBC337.14	caf4	rpb4	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436847	3361526	2540392	280602	276920	SPAC664.15	SPBC365.15	caf4	alp4	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436848	3361526	2540958	280602	277474	SPAC664.15	SPBC409.19c	caf4	SPBC409.19c	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436849	3361526	2540892	280602	277408	SPAC664.15	SPBC530.01	caf4	gyp1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436850	3361526	2541059	280602	277574	SPAC664.15	SPBC557.03c	caf4	pim1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	dcd1|ptr2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436851	3361526	2540891	280602	277407	SPAC664.15	SPBC582.08	caf4	SPBC582.08	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436852	3361526	2540569	280602	277096	SPAC664.15	SPBC660.17c	caf4	SPBC660.17c	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436853	3361526	2541184	280602	277698	SPAC664.15	SPBC725.17c	caf4	rrn11	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436854	3361526	2541214	280602	277728	SPAC664.15	SPBC839.07	caf4	ibp1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436855	3361526	2541240	280602	277754	SPAC664.15	SPBC8D2.11	caf4	SPBC8D2.11	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	pI054	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436856	3361526	2541249	280602	277763	SPAC664.15	SPBC947.01	caf4	alf1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	SPBC947.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436857	3361526	2541368	280602	277879	SPAC664.15	SPBP4H10.21c	caf4	sld5	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436858	3361526	2539050	280602	275623	SPAC664.15	SPCC11E10.08	caf4	rik1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436859	3361526	2539066	280602	275638	SPAC664.15	SPCC126.13c	caf4	SPCC126.13c	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436860	3361526	2538719	280602	275303	SPAC664.15	SPCC1393.04	caf4	fta4	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	sma4	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436861	3361526	2539194	280602	275765	SPAC664.15	SPCC1682.07	caf4	ssl1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	tfh47	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436862	3361526	2539366	280602	275932	SPAC664.15	SPCC16C4.11	caf4	pef1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	p31	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436863	3361526	2539036	280602	275609	SPAC664.15	SPCC1840.01c	caf4	mog1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	SPCC790.04c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436864	3361526	2539351	280602	275917	SPAC664.15	SPCC1840.11	caf4	csl4	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	SPCC965.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436865	3361526	2538744	280602	275327	SPAC664.15	SPCC306.03c	caf4	cnd2	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436866	3361526	2538963	280602	275537	SPAC664.15	SPCC777.08c	caf4	bit61	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	SPCC777.08	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436867	3361526	2539585	280602	276144	SPAC664.15	SPCC794.10	caf4	SPCC794.10	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436868	2542152	2542152	278628	278628	SPAC589.12	SPAC589.12	SPAC589.12	SPAC589.12	SPAC688.01	SPAC688.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436869	2543336	2543336	279759	279759	SPAC688.11	SPAC688.11	end4	end4	sla2	sla2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436870	2543336	2540268	279759	276799	SPAC688.11	SPBC800.06	end4	brx1	sla2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436871	2543336	2540735	279759	277258	SPAC688.11	SPBC83.03c	end4	tas3	sla2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436872	2543336	2541281	279759	277794	SPAC688.11	SPBC902.04	end4	rmn1	sla2	SPBC902.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436873	2543336	2541271	279759	277785	SPAC688.11	SPBC947.13	end4	rba50	sla2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436874	2543336	2541305	279759	277817	SPAC688.11	SPBC9B6.08	end4	clc1	sla2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436875	2543240	2540728	279668	277251	SPAC694.06c	SPBC216.06c	mrc1	swi1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436876	2543237	2542029	279665	278511	SPAC6B12.02c	SPAC8E11.02c	mus7	rad24	mms22	anr5|sam4	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436877	2543274	2540524	279702	277052	SPAC6C3.05	SPBC21B10.08c	SPAC6C3.05	SPBC21B10.08c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436878	2542733	2542427	279183	278889	SPAC6F12.04	SPAC6F6.12	SPAC6F12.04	SPAC6F6.12	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436879	2542733	2543502	279183	279920	SPAC6F12.04	SPAC890.06	SPAC6F12.04	nup155	-	nup157|nup170	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436880	2542733	2540079	279183	276617	SPAC6F12.04	SPBC13G1.03c	SPAC6F12.04	pex14	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436881	2542733	2540281	279183	276812	SPAC6F12.04	SPBC2G2.14	SPAC6F12.04	csi1	-	SPBC2G2.14	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436882	2542733	3361269	279183	280345	SPAC6F12.04	SPBC31A8.01c	SPAC6F12.04	rtn1	-	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436883	2542733	2540439	279183	276967	SPAC6F12.04	SPBC31F10.06c	SPAC6F12.04	sar1	-	psr1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436884	2542733	2540222	279183	276755	SPAC6F12.04	SPBC32F12.03c	SPAC6F12.04	gpx1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436885	2542733	2541026	279183	277541	SPAC6F12.04	SPBC337.09	SPAC6F12.04	erg28	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436886	2542733	2541188	279183	277702	SPAC6F12.04	SPBC83.16c	SPAC6F12.04	SPBC83.16c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436887	2543032	2543032	279468	279468	SPAC6F12.05c	SPAC6F12.05c	tnr3	tnr3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436888	2543032	2541456	279468	277959	SPAC6F12.05c	SPAC6G9.04	tnr3	spo7	-	mug79	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436889	2543032	2539816	279468	276366	SPAC6F12.05c	SPBC12C2.04	tnr3	SPBC12C2.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436890	2543032	2540466	279468	276994	SPAC6F12.05c	SPBC3E7.15c	tnr3	lac1	-	SPBC4F6.02c|mug83	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436891	2543032	2541273	279468	277787	SPAC6F12.05c	SPBC8D2.20c	tnr3	sec31	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436892	2543032	2539150	279468	275722	SPAC6F12.05c	SPCC1020.03	tnr3	mmt1	-	SPCC1020.03	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436893	2543032	2539137	279468	275709	SPAC6F12.05c	SPCC1682.08c	tnr3	mcp2	-	SPCC1682.08c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436894	2543032	2538916	279468	275493	SPAC6F12.05c	SPCC16C4.17	tnr3	mug123	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436895	2542959	2540409	279399	276937	SPAC6F12.07	SPBC2D10.11c	tom20	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436896	2542198	2539423	278673	275988	SPAC6F12.09	SPCC663.12	rdp1	cid12	rdr1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436897	2542898	2540933	279342	277449	SPAC6F12.13c	SPBC36.06c	fps1	spo9	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436898	2542108	2540409	278584	276937	SPAC6F6.07c	SPBC2D10.11c	rps13	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436899	2542390	2542390	278854	278854	SPAC6F6.11c	SPAC6F6.11c	SPAC6F6.11c	SPAC6F6.11c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436900	2542390	2538966	278854	275540	SPAC6F6.11c	SPCC18.10	SPAC6F6.11c	SPCC18.10	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436901	2542427	2540193	278889	276726	SPAC6F6.12	SPBC1289.10c	SPAC6F6.12	adn2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436902	2542427	2539722	278889	276275	SPAC6F6.12	SPBC14F5.11c	SPAC6F6.12	mug186	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436903	2542427	2539728	278889	276280	SPAC6F6.12	SPBC14F5.12c	SPAC6F6.12	cbh2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436904	2542427	2539631	278889	276187	SPAC6F6.12	SPBC16G5.16	SPAC6F6.12	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436905	2542427	2540735	278889	277258	SPAC6F6.12	SPBC83.03c	SPAC6F6.12	tas3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436906	2542619	2542619	279073	279073	SPAC6G10.02c	SPAC6G10.02c	tea3	tea3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436907	2542619	2541456	279073	277959	SPAC6G10.02c	SPAC6G9.04	tea3	spo7	-	mug79	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436908	2542619	2541735	279073	278229	SPAC6G10.02c	SPAC7D4.04	tea3	atg11	-	taf1|cvt9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436909	2542619	2539838	279073	276387	SPAC6G10.02c	SPBC1347.10	tea3	cdc23	-	mcm10	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436910	2542619	2539631	279073	276187	SPAC6G10.02c	SPBC16G5.16	tea3	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436911	2542619	2540804	279073	277323	SPAC6G10.02c	SPBC18E5.03c	tea3	sim4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436912	2542619	2540801	279073	277320	SPAC6G10.02c	SPBC18H10.10c	tea3	saf4	-	cwc16|cwf16	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436913	2542619	2540725	279073	277248	SPAC6G10.02c	SPBC215.14c	tea3	vps20	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436914	2542619	2540712	279073	277235	SPAC6G10.02c	SPBC216.02	tea3	mcp5	-	mug21|num1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436915	2542619	2540629	279073	277155	SPAC6G10.02c	SPBC21D10.09c	tea3	rkr1	-	SPBC21D10.09c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436916	2542619	2540234	279073	276766	SPAC6G10.02c	SPBC336.12c	tea3	cdc10	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436917	2542619	2540892	279073	277408	SPAC6G10.02c	SPBC530.01	tea3	gyp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436918	2542619	2541097	279073	277612	SPAC6G10.02c	SPBC582.06c	tea3	mcp6	-	hrs1|mug3	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436919	2542619	2541184	279073	277698	SPAC6G10.02c	SPBC725.17c	tea3	rrn11	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436920	2542619	2541216	279073	277730	SPAC6G10.02c	SPBC776.09	tea3	ste13	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436921	2542619	2541281	279073	277794	SPAC6G10.02c	SPBC902.04	tea3	rmn1	-	SPBC902.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436922	2542619	2538787	279073	275368	SPAC6G10.02c	SPCC364.02c	tea3	bis1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436923	2542619	2539507	279073	276070	SPAC6G10.02c	SPCC417.02	tea3	dad5	-	hos3|hsk3	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436924	2542559	2540916	279015	277432	SPAC6G10.04c	SPBC354.15	pre5	fap1	SPAC6G10.04c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436925	2541457	2540409	277960	276937	SPAC6G10.10c	SPBC2D10.11c	SPAC6G10.10c	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436926	2541457	2541264	277960	277778	SPAC6G10.10c	SPBC902.06	SPAC6G10.10c	mto2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436927	2541457	2538843	277960	275424	SPAC6G10.10c	SPCC162.08c	SPAC6G10.10c	nup211	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436928	2541445	2539956	277950	276500	SPAC6G10.11c	SPBC16E9.11c	ubi3	pub3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436929	2541661	2541661	278157	278157	SPAC6G10.12c	SPAC6G10.12c	ace2	ace2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436930	2541456	2541735	277959	278229	SPAC6G9.04	SPAC7D4.04	spo7	atg11	mug79	taf1|cvt9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436931	2541456	2543646	277959	280060	SPAC6G9.04	SPAC821.07c	spo7	moc3	mug79	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436932	2541456	2543382	277959	279804	SPAC6G9.04	SPAC890.02c	spo7	alp7	mug79	mia1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436933	2541456	2542106	277959	278582	SPAC6G9.04	SPAC8E11.03c	spo7	dmc1	mug79	dmp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436934	2541456	2543290	277959	279715	SPAC6G9.04	SPAC9E9.10c	spo7	cbh1	mug79	cbh	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436935	2541456	2541470	277959	277972	SPAC6G9.04	SPAPYUG7.04c	spo7	rpb9	mug79	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436936	2541456	2539914	277959	276458	SPAC6G9.04	SPBC12D12.01	spo7	sad1	mug79	SPBC16H5.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436937	2541456	2539728	277959	276280	SPAC6G9.04	SPBC14F5.12c	spo7	cbh2	mug79	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436938	2541456	2539899	277959	276445	SPAC6G9.04	SPBC16D10.01c	spo7	SPBC16D10.01c	mug79	SPBC418.03c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436939	2541456	3361342	277959	280418	SPAC6G9.04	SPBC16D10.07c	spo7	sir2	mug79	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436940	2541456	2539956	277959	276500	SPAC6G9.04	SPBC16E9.11c	spo7	pub3	mug79	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436941	2541456	2539631	277959	276187	SPAC6G9.04	SPBC16G5.16	spo7	SPBC16G5.16	mug79	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436942	2541456	2539820	277959	276370	SPAC6G9.04	SPBC1709.13c	spo7	set10	mug79	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436943	2541456	2540526	277959	277054	SPAC6G9.04	SPBC26H8.01	spo7	thi2	mug79	nmt2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436944	2541456	2540409	277959	276937	SPAC6G9.04	SPBC2D10.11c	spo7	nap2	mug79	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436945	2541456	2540350	277959	276879	SPAC6G9.04	SPBC317.01	spo7	mbx2	mug79	pvg4	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436946	2541456	2540813	277959	277332	SPAC6G9.04	SPBC409.15	spo7	SPBC409.15	mug79	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436947	2541456	2540537	277959	277064	SPAC6G9.04	SPBC56F2.07c	spo7	SPBC56F2.07c	mug79	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436948	2541456	2540735	277959	277258	SPAC6G9.04	SPBC83.03c	spo7	tas3	mug79	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436949	2541456	2541264	277959	277778	SPAC6G9.04	SPBC902.06	spo7	mto2	mug79	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436950	2541456	2541287	277959	277800	SPAC6G9.04	SPBP22H7.05c	spo7	abo2	mug79	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436951	2541456	2538952	277959	275526	SPAC6G9.04	SPCC1235.10c	spo7	sec6	mug79	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436952	2541456	2539036	277959	275609	SPAC6G9.04	SPCC1840.01c	spo7	mog1	mug79	SPCC790.04c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436953	2541456	2539562	277959	276123	SPAC6G9.04	SPCC569.01c	spo7	SPCC569.01c	mug79	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436954	2541456	2539349	277959	275915	SPAC6G9.04	SPCC613.11c	spo7	meu23	mug79	B13958-2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436955	2541456	2539093	277959	275665	SPAC6G9.04	SPCC736.15	spo7	pil1	mug79	SPCC736.15	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436956	2541978	2540240	278463	276772	SPAC6G9.12	SPBC31F10.16	cfr1	SPBC31F10.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436957	2541978	2540972	278463	277488	SPAC6G9.12	SPBC428.15	cfr1	SPBC428.15	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436958	2541960	2539354	278447	275920	SPAC6G9.15c	SPCC4F11.03c	SPAC6G9.15c	SPCC4F11.03c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436959	2541931	2539631	278419	276187	SPAC6G9.16c	SPBC16G5.16	SPAC6G9.16c	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436960	2541735	2541735	278229	278229	SPAC7D4.04	SPAC7D4.04	atg11	atg11	taf1|cvt9	taf1|cvt9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436961	2541735	2543646	278229	280060	SPAC7D4.04	SPAC821.07c	atg11	moc3	taf1|cvt9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436962	2541735	2543670	278229	280084	SPAC7D4.04	SPAPB1E7.06c	atg11	eme1	taf1|cvt9	mms4|slx2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436963	2541735	2539838	278229	276387	SPAC7D4.04	SPBC1347.10	atg11	cdc23	taf1|cvt9	mcm10	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436964	2541735	2540186	278229	276719	SPAC7D4.04	SPBC13E7.02	atg11	cwf24	taf1|cvt9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436965	2541735	2539666	278229	276221	SPAC7D4.04	SPBC16A3.11	atg11	eso1	taf1|cvt9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436966	2541735	2539631	278229	276187	SPAC7D4.04	SPBC16G5.16	atg11	SPBC16G5.16	taf1|cvt9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436967	2541735	2539958	278229	276502	SPAC7D4.04	SPBC1718.07c	atg11	zfs1	taf1|cvt9	moc4	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436968	2541735	2540801	278229	277320	SPAC7D4.04	SPBC18H10.10c	atg11	saf4	taf1|cvt9	cwc16|cwf16	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436969	2541735	2540833	278229	277351	SPAC7D4.04	SPBC18H10.20c	atg11	any1	taf1|cvt9	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436970	2541735	2540787	278229	277306	SPAC7D4.04	SPBC1921.07c	atg11	sgf29	taf1|cvt9	SPBC21D10.13	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436971	2541735	2540249	278229	276781	SPAC7D4.04	SPBC32F12.08c	atg11	duo1	taf1|cvt9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436972	2541735	2540303	278229	276833	SPAC7D4.04	SPBC354.01	atg11	gtp1	taf1|cvt9	SPBC649.06	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436973	2541735	2541020	278229	277535	SPAC7D4.04	SPBC354.04	atg11	SPBC354.04	taf1|cvt9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436974	2541735	2540951	278229	277467	SPAC7D4.04	SPBC3B8.11	atg11	rrn6	taf1|cvt9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436975	2541735	2540892	278229	277408	SPAC7D4.04	SPBC530.01	atg11	gyp1	taf1|cvt9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436976	2541735	2540569	278229	277096	SPAC7D4.04	SPBC660.17c	atg11	SPBC660.17c	taf1|cvt9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436977	2541735	2541216	278229	277730	SPAC7D4.04	SPBC776.09	atg11	ste13	taf1|cvt9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436978	2541735	2540735	278229	277258	SPAC7D4.04	SPBC83.03c	atg11	tas3	taf1|cvt9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436979	2541735	2541203	278229	277717	SPAC7D4.04	SPBC83.18c	atg11	fic1	taf1|cvt9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436980	2541735	2541214	278229	277728	SPAC7D4.04	SPBC839.07	atg11	ibp1	taf1|cvt9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436981	2541735	3361259	278229	280335	SPAC7D4.04	SPBP22H7.08	atg11	rps1002	taf1|cvt9	rps10-2|rps10B|pi023|SPACTOKYO_453.11	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436982	2541735	2539216	278229	275786	SPAC7D4.04	SPCC14G10.04	atg11	SPCC14G10.04	taf1|cvt9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436983	2541735	2539137	278229	275709	SPAC7D4.04	SPCC1682.08c	atg11	mcp2	taf1|cvt9	SPCC1682.08c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436984	2541735	2538988	278229	275562	SPAC7D4.04	SPCC188.11	atg11	prp45	taf1|cvt9	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436985	2541735	2539242	278229	275812	SPAC7D4.04	SPCC290.04	atg11	ams2	taf1|cvt9	SPCC4F11.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436986	2541735	2538787	278229	275368	SPAC7D4.04	SPCC364.02c	atg11	bis1	taf1|cvt9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436987	2541735	2539495	278229	276058	SPAC7D4.04	SPCC4F11.02	atg11	ptc1	taf1|cvt9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436988	2541735	2539314	278229	275880	SPAC7D4.04	SPCC548.05c	atg11	dbl5	taf1|cvt9	SPCC548.05c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436989	2541735	2538994	278229	275568	SPAC7D4.04	SPCC553.01c	atg11	dbl2	taf1|cvt9	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436990	2541735	2539461	278229	276024	SPAC7D4.04	SPCC63.08c	atg11	atg1	taf1|cvt9	cvt10|ppk36	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436991	2541735	2539486	278229	276049	SPAC7D4.04	SPCC74.09	atg11	mug24	taf1|cvt9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436992	2541735	2538963	278229	275537	SPAC7D4.04	SPCC777.08c	atg11	bit61	taf1|cvt9	SPCC777.08	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436993	2543085	2543646	279518	280060	SPAC806.03c	SPAC821.07c	rps2601	moc3	rps26|rps26-1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436994	2543085	2540409	279518	276937	SPAC806.03c	SPBC2D10.11c	rps2601	nap2	rps26|rps26-1	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436995	2543085	2540813	279518	277332	SPAC806.03c	SPBC409.15	rps2601	SPBC409.15	rps26|rps26-1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436996	2543055	2543055	279489	279489	SPAC806.06c	SPAC806.06c	SPAC806.06c	SPAC806.06c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436997	2543055	2539928	279489	276472	SPAC806.06c	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC806.06c	imp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436998	2543111	2543111	279543	279543	SPAC806.07	SPAC806.07	ndk1	ndk1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1436999	2543199	2538952	279628	275526	SPAC821.03c	SPCC1235.10c	slf1	sec6	SPAC821.03c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437000	2543204	2543646	279633	280060	SPAC821.04c	SPAC821.07c	cid13	moc3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437001	2543204	2542795	279633	279243	SPAC821.04c	SPAC9G1.05	cid13	aip1	-	SPAC9G1.05	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437002	2543204	2540580	279633	277106	SPAC821.04c	SPBC19C2.05	cid13	ran1	-	pat1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437003	2543204	2539454	279633	276017	SPAC821.04c	SPCC622.15c	cid13	SPCC622.15c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437004	2543513	2542193	279931	278668	SPAC821.06	SPAC9G1.11c	spn2	spn4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437005	2543646	2543646	280060	280060	SPAC821.07c	SPAC821.07c	moc3	moc3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437006	2543646	2543290	280060	279715	SPAC821.07c	SPAC9E9.10c	moc3	cbh1	-	cbh	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437007	2543646	2539928	280060	276472	SPAC821.07c	SPBC1604.08c	moc3	imp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437008	2543646	2539740	280060	276292	SPAC821.07c	SPBC1685.04	moc3	SPBC1685.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437009	2543646	2540072	280060	276610	SPAC821.07c	SPBC16H5.07c	moc3	ppa2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437010	2543646	2540833	280060	277351	SPAC821.07c	SPBC18H10.20c	moc3	any1	-	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437011	2543646	2540580	280060	277106	SPAC821.07c	SPBC19C2.05	moc3	ran1	-	pat1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437012	2543646	2540657	280060	277182	SPAC821.07c	SPBC1E8.02	moc3	SPBC1E8.02	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437013	2543646	2540667	280060	277192	SPAC821.07c	SPBC211.06	moc3	gfh1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437014	2543646	2540645	280060	277170	SPAC821.07c	SPBC21B10.05c	moc3	pop3	-	wat1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437015	2543646	2541033	280060	277548	SPAC821.07c	SPBC3B9.21	moc3	dcp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437016	2543646	2540991	280060	277507	SPAC821.07c	SPBC3H7.03c	moc3	SPBC3H7.03c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437017	2543646	2540880	280060	277397	SPAC821.07c	SPBC582.03	moc3	cdc13	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437018	2543646	2541137	280060	277652	SPAC821.07c	SPBC660.06	moc3	SPBC660.06	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437019	2543646	2541201	280060	277715	SPAC821.07c	SPBC776.13	moc3	cnd1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437020	2543646	2541281	280060	277794	SPAC821.07c	SPBC902.04	moc3	rmn1	-	SPBC902.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437021	2543646	2539050	280060	275623	SPAC821.07c	SPCC11E10.08	moc3	rik1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437022	2542228	2539614	278701	276172	SPAC823.03	SPBC17D11.08	ppk15	SPBC17D11.08	SPAC1E11.03	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437023	2543571	2543571	279986	279986	SPAC823.08c	SPAC823.08c	SPAC823.08c	SPAC823.08c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437024	2542052	2539161	278531	275733	SPAC823.15	SPCC63.05	ppa1	tap42	-	SPCC63.05	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437025	2543094	2543094	279526	279526	SPAC824.03c	SPAC824.03c	SPAC824.03c	SPAC824.03c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437026	2543382	2543382	279804	279804	SPAC890.02c	SPAC890.02c	alp7	alp7	mia1	mia1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437027	2543382	2543289	279804	279714	SPAC890.02c	SPAC9E9.08	alp7	rad26	mia1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437028	2543382	2539838	279804	276387	SPAC890.02c	SPBC1347.10	alp7	cdc23	mia1	mcm10	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437029	2543382	2539928	279804	276472	SPAC890.02c	SPBC1604.08c	alp7	imp1	mia1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437030	2543382	2541350	279804	277861	SPAC890.02c	SPBP4H10.11c	alp7	lcf2	mia1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437031	2543382	2538711	279804	275295	SPAC890.02c	SPCC1281.02c	alp7	spf30	mia1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437032	2543382	2539497	279804	276060	SPAC890.02c	SPCC895.07	alp7	alp14	mia1	mtc1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437033	2543549	2540888	279966	277405	SPAC890.04c	SPBC4F6.13c	SPAC890.04c	SPBC4F6.13c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437034	2543502	2539914	279920	276458	SPAC890.06	SPBC12D12.01	nup155	sad1	nup157|nup170	SPBC16H5.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437035	2543502	3361269	279920	280345	SPAC890.06	SPBC31A8.01c	nup155	rtn1	nup157|nup170	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437036	2543502	2541039	279920	277554	SPAC890.06	SPBC3B9.19	nup155	mge1	nup157|nup170	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437037	2543502	2539185	279920	275756	SPAC890.06	SPCC737.03c	nup155	ima1	nup157|nup170	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437038	2543502	2539171	279920	275742	SPAC890.06	SPCC830.08c	nup155	yop1	nup157|nup170	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437039	2543351	2543351	279773	279773	SPAC8C9.03	SPAC8C9.03	cgs1	cgs1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437040	2543351	2539928	279773	276472	SPAC8C9.03	SPBC1604.08c	cgs1	imp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437041	2543351	2539687	279773	276242	SPAC8C9.03	SPBC1711.05	cgs1	SPBC1711.05	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437042	2542939	2539906	279380	276452	SPAC8C9.08	SPBC16G5.17	rps5	SPBC16G5.17	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437043	2542939	2540409	279380	276937	SPAC8C9.08	SPBC2D10.11c	rps5	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437044	2541756	2539216	278250	275786	SPAC8C9.14	SPCC14G10.04	prr1	SPCC14G10.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437045	2542102	2542102	278578	278578	SPAC8C9.17c	SPAC8C9.17c	spc34	spc34	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437046	2542702	2542702	279155	279155	SPAC8E11.01c	SPAC8E11.01c	SPAC8E11.01c	SPAC8E11.01c	SPAC959.01	SPAC959.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437047	2542029	2542029	278511	278511	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC8E11.02c	rad24	rad24	anr5|sam4	anr5|sam4	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437048	2542106	2542106	278582	278582	SPAC8E11.03c	SPAC8E11.03c	dmc1	dmc1	dmp1	dmp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437049	2542106	2540186	278582	276719	SPAC8E11.03c	SPBC13E7.02	dmc1	cwf24	dmp1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437050	2542106	2539928	278582	276472	SPAC8E11.03c	SPBC1604.08c	dmc1	imp1	dmp1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437051	2542654	2541665	279108	278161	SPAC8E11.05c	SPAP27G11.16	SPAC8E11.05c	SPAP27G11.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437052	2542654	2540696	279108	277220	SPAC8E11.05c	SPBC800.14c	SPAC8E11.05c	SPBC800.14c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437053	2542654	5802723	279108	857861	SPAC8E11.05c	SPCC417.15	SPAC8E11.05c	SPCC417.15	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437054	2542686	2539186	279139	275757	SPAC26A3.17c	SPCC16C4.13c	SPAC26A3.17c	rpl1201	SPAC8E11.11	rpl12-1|rpl12.1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437055	2543596	2539914	280011	276458	SPAC8F11.06	SPBC12D12.01	brr6	sad1	brl1	SPBC16H5.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437056	2543662	2539943	280076	276487	SPAC9.07c	SPBC14F5.05c	SPAC9.07c	sam1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437057	2543564	2543564	279980	279980	SPAC922.03	SPAC922.03	SPAC922.03	SPAC922.03	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437058	2543539	2539806	279956	276356	SPAC926.04c	SPBC1711.08	hsp90	aha1	git10|swo1	SPBC1711.08	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437059	2543488	2538986	279908	275560	SPAC959.02	SPCC895.06	sec17	elp2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437060	2543337	2540409	279760	276937	SPAC959.08	SPBC2D10.11c	rpl2102	nap2	rpl21|rpl21-2	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437061	3361466	3361466	280542	280542	SPAC959.10	SPAC959.10	sen15	sen15	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437062	3361466	2540591	280542	277117	SPAC959.10	SPBC19C7.07c	sen15	sen34	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437063	2543296	2541358	279721	277869	SPAC9E9.03	SPBP4H10.16c	leu2	SPBP4H10.16c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437064	2543290	2543290	279715	279715	SPAC9E9.10c	SPAC9E9.10c	cbh1	cbh1	cbh	cbh	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437065	2543290	2539838	279715	276387	SPAC9E9.10c	SPBC1347.10	cbh1	cdc23	cbh	mcm10	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437066	2543290	2540186	279715	276719	SPAC9E9.10c	SPBC13E7.02	cbh1	cwf24	cbh	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437067	2543290	2539887	279715	276433	SPAC9E9.10c	SPBC13G1.09	cbh1	SPBC13G1.09	cbh	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437068	2543290	2539928	279715	276472	SPAC9E9.10c	SPBC1604.08c	cbh1	imp1	cbh	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437069	2543290	2539740	279715	276292	SPAC9E9.10c	SPBC1685.04	cbh1	SPBC1685.04	cbh	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437070	2543290	2540787	279715	277306	SPAC9E9.10c	SPBC1921.07c	cbh1	sgf29	cbh	SPBC21D10.13	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437071	2543290	2540667	279715	277192	SPAC9E9.10c	SPBC211.06	cbh1	gfh1	cbh	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437072	2543290	2540464	279715	276992	SPAC9E9.10c	SPBC23E6.02	cbh1	rrp2	cbh	SPBC23E6.02	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437073	2543290	2540394	279715	276922	SPAC9E9.10c	SPBC2D10.09	cbh1	snr1	cbh	SPBC2D10.09	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437074	2543290	2540558	279715	277085	SPAC9E9.10c	SPBC2D10.17	cbh1	clr1	cbh	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437075	2543290	2541011	279715	277526	SPAC9E9.10c	SPBC337.14	cbh1	rpb4	cbh	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437076	2543290	2540215	279715	276748	SPAC9E9.10c	SPBC83.14c	cbh1	rfc5	cbh	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437077	2543290	2541235	279715	277749	SPAC9E9.10c	SPBC8D2.12c	cbh1	SPBC8D2.12c	cbh	pI053	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437078	2543290	2541306	279715	277818	SPAC9E9.10c	SPBP16F5.07	cbh1	apm1	cbh	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437079	2543290	2539087	279715	275659	SPAC9E9.10c	SPCC1259.13	cbh1	chk1	cbh	rad27	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437080	2543290	9407293	279715	1028656	SPAC9E9.10c	SPCC1442.19	cbh1	SPCC1442.19	cbh	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437081	2543290	2539122	279715	275694	SPAC9E9.10c	SPCC14G10.03c	cbh1	ump1	cbh	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437082	2543290	2539423	279715	275988	SPAC9E9.10c	SPCC663.12	cbh1	cid12	cbh	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437083	2542472	2540511	278933	277039	SPAC9E9.13	SPBC1718.01	wos2	pop1	-	SPBC2G2.18|ste16	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437084	2542472	2541004	278933	277519	SPAC9E9.13	SPBC3F6.01c	wos2	SPBC3F6.01c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437085	2542472	2540958	278933	277474	SPAC9E9.13	SPBC409.19c	wos2	SPBC409.19c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437086	2542323	2541353	278789	277864	SPAC9E9.15	SPBP35G2.11c	SPAC9E9.15	SPBP35G2.11c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437087	2542873	2542873	279318	279318	SPAC9G1.02	SPAC9G1.02	wis4	wis4	wak1|wik1	wak1|wik1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437088	2542873	2541178	279318	277692	SPAC9G1.02	SPBC725.02	wis4	mpr1	wak1|wik1	spy1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437089	2542873	2541209	279318	277723	SPAC9G1.02	SPBC887.10	wis4	mcs4	wak1|wik1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437090	2542594	2542594	279048	279048	SPACUNK4.10	SPACUNK4.10	SPACUNK4.10	SPACUNK4.10	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437091	2542021	2539717	278504	276270	SPAP14E8.02	SPBC15D4.08c	tos4	SPBC15D4.08c	SPAP14E8.02	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437092	2541953	2541953	278440	278440	SPAP27G11.07c	SPAP27G11.07c	bud32	bud32	SPAP27G11.07c	SPAP27G11.07c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437093	2541490	2541490	277992	277992	SPAP27G11.09c	SPAP27G11.09c	SPAP27G11.09c	SPAP27G11.09c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437094	2541584	2539972	278081	276516	SPAP32A8.02	SPBC16H5.02	SPAP32A8.02	pfk1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437095	2542764	2540462	279214	276990	SPAC15E1.10	SPBC29A3.07c	SPAC15E1.10	sap14	SPAP7G5.01	sab14|SF3b14a	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437096	2541495	2541184	277997	277698	SPAP8A3.02c	SPBC725.17c	ofd2	rrn11	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437097	2542125	2542125	278601	278601	SPAP8A3.03	SPAP8A3.03	SPAP8A3.03	SPAP8A3.03	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437098	2542482	2539645	278942	276200	SPAP8A3.06	SPBC146.07	uaf2	prp2	SPAP8A3.06|ods2	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437099	2541699	2539488	278195	276051	SPAP8A3.08	SPCC645.08c	cdc4	snd1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437100	2543156	2538952	279587	275526	SPAP8A3.13c	SPCC1235.10c	SPAP8A3.13c	sec6	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437101	2543143	2539980	279575	276524	SPAPB1A10.04c	SPBC1773.14	cwp1	arg7	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437102	2543371	2540409	279793	276937	SPAPB1A10.06c	SPBC2D10.11c	SPAPB1A10.06c	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437103	2543369	3361269	279791	280345	SPAPB1A10.07c	SPBC31A8.01c	SPAPB1A10.07c	rtn1	-	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437104	2543372	2543372	279794	279794	SPAPB1A10.09	SPAPB1A10.09	ase1	ase1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437105	2543372	2539838	279794	276387	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC1347.10	ase1	cdc23	-	mcm10	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437106	2543430	2543430	279850	279850	SPAPB1A10.12c	SPAPB1A10.12c	alo1	alo1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437107	2543387	2543387	279809	279809	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAPB1E7.02c	mcl1	mcl1	slr3	slr3	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437108	2543387	2540475	279809	277003	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC30D10.06	mcl1	lsm4	slr3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437109	2543581	2540409	279996	276937	SPAPB1E7.12	SPBC2D10.11c	rps602	nap2	rps6|rps6-2	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437110	2543469	2543469	279889	279889	SPAPB2B4.05	SPAPB2B4.05	vma5	vma5	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437111	2543309	2540409	279733	276937	SPAPB8E5.06c	SPBC2D10.11c	rpl302	nap2	rpl3-2|rpl3-b	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437112	2543324	2543324	279747	279747	SPAPJ696.01c	SPAPJ696.01c	vps17	vps17	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437113	2541470	2540161	277972	276696	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC13E7.03c	rpb9	SPBC13E7.03c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437114	2541470	2539631	277972	276187	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC16G5.16	rpb9	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437115	2541470	2540580	277972	277106	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC19C2.05	rpb9	ran1	-	pat1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437116	2541470	2540318	277972	276848	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC30B4.04c	rpb9	sol1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437117	2541470	2540133	277972	276670	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPBC3B8.02	rpb9	php5	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437118	2541470	2538704	277972	275288	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPCC320.07c	rpb9	mde7	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437119	2541470	2539540	277972	276102	SPAPYUG7.04c	SPCC736.12c	rpb9	mmi1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437120	2540053	2541054	276591	277569	SPBC106.06	SPBC3B8.08	cct4	SPBC3B8.08	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437121	2540173	2539354	276706	275920	SPBC106.13	SPCC4F11.03c	SPBC106.13	SPCC4F11.03c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437122	2539889	2540409	276435	276937	SPBC106.14c	SPBC2D10.11c	sda1	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437123	2539889	2539538	276435	276100	SPBC106.14c	SPCC364.06	sda1	nap1	-	nap11	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437124	2539630	2539631	276186	276187	SPBC106.19	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC106.19	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC582.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437125	2539630	2539785	276186	276335	SPBC106.19	SPBC1773.16c	SPBC106.19	SPBC1773.16c	SPBC582.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437126	2539815	2539815	276365	276365	SPBC1105.02c	SPBC1105.02c	lys4	lys4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437127	2539971	2539971	276515	276515	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC1105.04c	cbp1	cbp1	abp1	abp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437128	2539971	2540318	276515	276848	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC30B4.04c	cbp1	sol1	abp1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437129	2539994	2540377	276538	276906	SPBC1105.06	SPBC36.08c	pmc4	cog2	med4	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437130	2539994	2539447	276538	276010	SPBC1105.06	SPCC338.17c	pmc4	rad21	med4	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437131	2539994	2539581	276538	276140	SPBC1105.06	SPCC965.03	pmc4	vma8	med4	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437132	2540095	2540095	276633	276633	SPBC115.03	SPBC115.03	SPBC115.03	SPBC115.03	SPBC839.18c	SPBC839.18c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437133	2540095	2541386	276633	277897	SPBC115.03	SPBP8B7.24c	SPBC115.03	atg8	SPBC839.18c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437134	2540083	2539956	276621	276500	SPBC119.02	SPBC16E9.11c	ubc4	pub3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437135	2540083	2540987	276621	277503	SPBC119.02	SPBC36B7.05c	ubc4	SPBC36B7.05c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437136	2540083	2539349	276621	275915	SPBC119.02	SPCC613.11c	ubc4	meu23	-	B13958-2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437137	2540070	2540580	276608	277106	SPBC119.04	SPBC19C2.05	mei3	ran1	-	pat1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437138	2539945	2539945	276489	276489	SPBC119.05c	SPBC119.05c	SPBC119.05c	SPBC119.05c	csh3	csh3	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437139	2539945	2541384	276489	277895	SPBC119.05c	SPBP8B7.26	SPBC119.05c	SPBP8B7.26	csh3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437140	2540045	2540045	276583	276583	SPBC119.13c	SPBC119.13c	prp31	prp31	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437141	2540098	2540537	276636	277064	SPBC119.18	SPBC56F2.07c	SPBC119.18	SPBC56F2.07c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437142	2539854	2539854	276402	276402	SPBC11B10.01	SPBC11B10.01	alg2	alg2	SPBC32H8.14|pi010|SPACTOKYO_453.27	SPBC32H8.14|pi010|SPACTOKYO_453.27	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437143	2539966	2541145	276510	277660	SPBC11B10.06	SPBC651.12c	sws1	dbl7	pi005|SPACTOKYO_453.32	SPBC651.12c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437144	2539874	2541133	276420	277648	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC660.05	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC660.05	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437145	2539874	2541137	276420	277652	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC660.06	SPBC11B10.08	SPBC660.06	pi003|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437146	2539869	2540027	276415	276571	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC1734.14c	cdc2	suc1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	p13	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437147	2539869	2540880	276415	277397	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC582.03	cdc2	cdc13	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437148	2539869	2541193	276415	277707	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC776.02c	cdc2	dis2	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	bws1|sds1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437149	2539668	2540409	276223	276937	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC2D10.11c	pht1	nap2	pi001	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437150	2539668	2538752	276223	275335	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC830.11c	pht1	fap7	pi001	SPCC830.11c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437151	2540112	2540112	276649	276649	SPBC11C11.02	SPBC11C11.02	imp2	imp2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437152	2540112	2540462	276649	276990	SPBC11C11.02	SPBC29A3.07c	imp2	sap14	-	sab14|SF3b14a	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437153	2539678	2540409	276233	276937	SPBC11C11.07	SPBC2D10.11c	rpl1801	nap2	rpl18|rpl18-1	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437154	2539818	2539941	276368	276485	SPBC11C11.08	SPBC13E7.01	srp1	cwf22	-	SPBC15D4.16	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437155	2539818	2539459	276368	276022	SPBC11C11.08	SPCC825.05c	srp1	pwi1	-	SPCC825.05c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437156	2539833	2538952	276382	275526	SPBC11G11.04	SPCC1235.10c	trs20	sec6	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437157	2539832	2539832	276381	276381	SPBC1271.04c	SPBC1271.04c	SPBC1271.04c	SPBC1271.04c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437158	2539832	2539918	276381	276462	SPBC1271.04c	SPBC1306.02	SPBC1271.04c	rtt10	-	SPBC1306.02|SPBC4.08	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437159	2539832	2539928	276381	276472	SPBC1271.04c	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC1271.04c	imp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437160	2539832	2540232	276381	276764	SPBC1271.04c	SPBC336.10c	SPBC1271.04c	tif512	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437161	2540149	2540419	276686	276947	SPBC1289.03c	SPBC30B4.05	spi1	kap109	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437162	2540149	2541311	276686	277823	SPBC1289.03c	SPBP8B7.09c	spi1	los1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437163	2540149	2539036	276686	275609	SPBC1289.03c	SPCC1840.01c	spi1	mog1	-	SPCC790.04c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437164	2540193	2539928	276726	276472	SPBC1289.10c	SPBC1604.08c	adn2	imp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437165	2540193	2541020	276726	277535	SPBC1289.10c	SPBC354.04	adn2	SPBC354.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437166	2540001	2540730	276545	277253	SPBC1289.13c	SPBC19C2.09	gmh6	sre1	SPBC1289.13c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437167	2539816	2539816	276366	276366	SPBC12C2.04	SPBC12C2.04	SPBC12C2.04	SPBC12C2.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437168	2539679	2539679	276234	276234	SPBC12C2.05c	SPBC12C2.05c	bzz1	bzz1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437169	2539975	2539975	276519	276519	SPBC12C2.06	SPBC12C2.06	dbp5	dbp5	SPBC12C2.06	SPBC12C2.06	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437170	2539919	2539919	276463	276463	SPBC12C2.07c	SPBC12C2.07c	srm1	srm1	SPBC12C2.07c	SPBC12C2.07c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437171	2540159	2540159	276694	276694	SPBC12C2.08	SPBC12C2.08	dnm1	dnm1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437172	2540018	2539644	276562	276199	SPBC12C2.10c	SPBC16E9.01c	pst1	php4	SPBC21D10.01c	SPBP16F5.09c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437173	2539914	2539914	276458	276458	SPBC12D12.01	SPBC12D12.01	sad1	sad1	SPBC16H5.01c	SPBC16H5.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437174	2539914	2540629	276458	277155	SPBC12D12.01	SPBC21D10.09c	sad1	rkr1	SPBC16H5.01c	SPBC21D10.09c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437175	2539914	2540282	276458	276813	SPBC12D12.01	SPBC2G2.03c	sad1	sbh1	SPBC16H5.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437176	2539914	2540289	276458	276820	SPBC12D12.01	SPBC31E1.04	sad1	pep12	SPBC16H5.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437177	2539914	2540880	276458	277397	SPBC12D12.01	SPBC582.03	sad1	cdc13	SPBC16H5.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437178	2539914	2541306	276458	277818	SPBC12D12.01	SPBP16F5.07	sad1	apm1	SPBC16H5.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437179	2539914	2539175	276458	275746	SPBC12D12.01	SPCC16C4.01	sad1	sif2	SPBC16H5.01c	SPCC5E4.09	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437180	2539914	2539124	276458	275696	SPBC12D12.01	SPCC1795.12c	sad1	SPCC1795.12c	SPBC16H5.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437181	2539914	2539185	276458	275756	SPBC12D12.01	SPCC737.03c	sad1	ima1	SPBC16H5.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437182	2539914	2539377	276458	275943	SPBC12D12.01	SPCC825.03c	sad1	psy1	SPBC16H5.01c	sso1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437183	2539914	2538854	276458	275435	SPBC12D12.01	SPCP1E11.05c	sad1	are2	SPBC16H5.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437184	2540106	2540106	276643	276643	SPBC12D12.09	SPBC12D12.09	rev7	rev7	SPAC12D12.09	SPAC12D12.09	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437185	2539838	2539728	276387	276280	SPBC1347.10	SPBC14F5.12c	cdc23	cbh2	mcm10	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437186	2539838	2539631	276387	276187	SPBC1347.10	SPBC16G5.16	cdc23	SPBC16G5.16	mcm10	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437187	2539838	2540784	276387	277303	SPBC1347.10	SPBC211.04c	cdc23	mcm6	mcm10	mis5	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437188	2539838	2540409	276387	276937	SPBC1347.10	SPBC2D10.11c	cdc23	nap2	mcm10	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437189	2539838	2540306	276387	276836	SPBC1347.10	SPBC2G5.02c	cdc23	ckb2	mcm10	SPBC2G5.02c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437190	2539838	2540735	276387	277258	SPBC1347.10	SPBC83.03c	cdc23	tas3	mcm10	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437191	2539838	2541287	276387	277800	SPBC1347.10	SPBP22H7.05c	cdc23	abo2	mcm10	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437192	2539838	2538952	276387	275526	SPBC1347.10	SPCC1235.10c	cdc23	sec6	mcm10	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437193	2539838	2538843	276387	275424	SPBC1347.10	SPCC162.08c	cdc23	nup211	mcm10	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437194	2539838	2539562	276387	276123	SPBC1347.10	SPCC569.01c	cdc23	SPCC569.01c	mcm10	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437195	2539838	2539093	276387	275665	SPBC1347.10	SPCC736.15	cdc23	pil1	mcm10	SPCC736.15	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437196	2540186	2539631	276719	276187	SPBC13E7.02	SPBC16G5.16	cwf24	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437197	2540186	2540735	276719	277258	SPBC13E7.02	SPBC83.03c	cwf24	tas3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437198	2540186	2538952	276719	275526	SPBC13E7.02	SPCC1235.10c	cwf24	sec6	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437199	2540186	2538894	276719	275472	SPBC13E7.02	SPCC1322.09	cwf24	SPCC1322.09	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437200	2540186	2538790	276719	275371	SPBC13E7.02	SPCC4B3.10c	cwf24	ipk1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437201	2540161	2539631	276696	276187	SPBC13E7.03c	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC13E7.03c	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437202	2540079	2540289	276617	276820	SPBC13G1.03c	SPBC31E1.04	pex14	pep12	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437203	2540079	2539017	276617	275590	SPBC13G1.03c	SPCC338.13	pex14	cog4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437204	2539887	2539728	276433	276280	SPBC13G1.09	SPBC14F5.12c	SPBC13G1.09	cbh2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437205	2539887	2539631	276433	276187	SPBC13G1.09	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC13G1.09	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437206	2539887	2540712	276433	277235	SPBC13G1.09	SPBC216.02	SPBC13G1.09	mcp5	-	mug21|num1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437207	2539887	2540409	276433	276937	SPBC13G1.09	SPBC2D10.11c	SPBC13G1.09	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437208	2539887	2540306	276433	276836	SPBC13G1.09	SPBC2G5.02c	SPBC13G1.09	ckb2	-	SPBC2G5.02c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437209	2539887	2540821	276433	277339	SPBC13G1.09	SPBC800.03	SPBC13G1.09	clr3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437210	2539887	2540735	276433	277258	SPBC13G1.09	SPBC83.03c	SPBC13G1.09	tas3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437211	2539775	2540408	276326	276936	SPBC14C8.17c	SPBC25H2.11c	spt8	spt7	sep9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437212	2539943	2539943	276487	276487	SPBC14F5.05c	SPBC14F5.05c	sam1	sam1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437213	2539943	2540772	276487	277292	SPBC14F5.05c	SPBC216.04c	sam1	mxr2	-	SPBC216.04c|MsrB	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437214	2539773	2540272	276324	276803	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC31F10.09c	med7	nut2	-	med10	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437215	2539773	2539504	276324	276067	SPBC14F5.08	SPCP31B10.03c	med7	med31	-	sep10|soh1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437216	2539985	2539985	276529	276529	SPBC14F5.09c	SPBC14F5.09c	ade8	ade8	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437217	2539985	2540462	276529	276990	SPBC14F5.09c	SPBC29A3.07c	ade8	sap14	-	sab14|SF3b14a	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437218	2539750	2541180	276302	277694	SPBC14F5.10c	SPBC776.05	SPBC14F5.10c	SPBC776.05	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437219	2539728	2539728	276280	276280	SPBC14F5.12c	SPBC14F5.12c	cbh2	cbh2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437220	2539728	2539928	276280	276472	SPBC14F5.12c	SPBC1604.08c	cbh2	imp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437221	2539728	2539740	276280	276292	SPBC14F5.12c	SPBC1685.04	cbh2	SPBC1685.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437222	2539728	3361342	276280	280418	SPBC14F5.12c	SPBC16D10.07c	cbh2	sir2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437223	2539728	2539820	276280	276370	SPBC14F5.12c	SPBC1709.13c	cbh2	set10	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437224	2539728	2540629	276280	277155	SPBC14F5.12c	SPBC21D10.09c	cbh2	rkr1	-	SPBC21D10.09c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437225	2539728	2540328	276280	276858	SPBC14F5.12c	SPBC31F10.11c	cbh2	cwf4	-	syf3	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437226	2539728	2541011	276280	277526	SPBC14F5.12c	SPBC337.14	cbh2	rpb4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437227	2539728	2540929	276280	277445	SPBC14F5.12c	SPBC354.03	cbh2	swd3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437228	2539728	2541306	276280	277818	SPBC14F5.12c	SPBP16F5.07	cbh2	apm1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437229	2539728	2539187	276280	275758	SPBC14F5.12c	SPCC16C4.14c	cbh2	sfc4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437230	2539728	2539351	276280	275917	SPBC14F5.12c	SPCC1840.11	cbh2	csl4	-	SPCC965.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437231	2539950	2539950	276494	276494	SPBC1539.03c	SPBC1539.03c	SPBC1539.03c	SPBC1539.03c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437232	2539950	2539980	276494	276524	SPBC1539.03c	SPBC1773.14	SPBC1539.03c	arg7	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437233	2539923	2539228	276467	275798	SPBC1539.04	SPCC16A11.12c	tts1	ubp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437234	2539937	2539937	276481	276481	SPBC1539.08	SPBC1539.08	arf6	arf6	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437235	2539606	2540928	276164	277444	SPBC15D4.05	SPBC3E7.10	SPBC15D4.05	fma1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437236	2539717	2539717	276270	276270	SPBC15D4.08c	SPBC15D4.08c	SPBC15D4.08c	SPBC15D4.08c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437237	2539717	2539928	276270	276472	SPBC15D4.08c	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC15D4.08c	imp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437238	2539717	2539093	276270	275665	SPBC15D4.08c	SPCC736.15	SPBC15D4.08c	pil1	-	SPCC736.15	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437239	2539618	2539631	276176	276187	SPBC15D4.12c	SPBC16G5.16	mug98	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437240	2539928	3361342	276472	280418	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC16D10.07c	imp1	sir2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437241	2539928	2539631	276472	276187	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC16G5.16	imp1	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437242	2539928	2541054	276472	277569	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC3B8.08	imp1	SPBC3B8.08	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437243	2539928	2541050	276472	277565	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC428.05c	imp1	arg12	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437244	2539928	2540735	276472	277258	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC83.03c	imp1	tas3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437245	2539928	2541362	276472	277873	SPBC1604.08c	SPBP8B7.05c	imp1	nce103	-	SPBP8B7.05c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437246	2539928	2539432	276472	275995	SPBC1604.08c	SPCC965.05c	imp1	thp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437247	2540168	2540168	276703	276703	SPBC1683.06c	SPBC1683.06c	SPBC1683.06c	SPBC1683.06c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437248	2540019	2540019	276563	276563	SPBC1685.01	SPBC1685.01	pmp1	pmp1	dsp1	dsp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437249	2539654	2539654	276209	276209	SPBC1685.03	SPBC1685.03	sec11	sec11	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437250	2539740	2539740	276292	276292	SPBC1685.04	SPBC1685.04	SPBC1685.04	SPBC1685.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437251	2539740	2539631	276292	276187	SPBC1685.04	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC1685.04	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437252	2539740	2540133	276292	276670	SPBC1685.04	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC1685.04	php5	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437253	2539740	2540735	276292	277258	SPBC1685.04	SPBC83.03c	SPBC1685.04	tas3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437254	2539740	2541209	276292	277723	SPBC1685.04	SPBC887.10	SPBC1685.04	mcs4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437255	2539740	2541281	276292	277794	SPBC1685.04	SPBC902.04	SPBC1685.04	rmn1	-	SPBC902.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437256	2539740	2538736	276292	275320	SPBC1685.04	SPCC1322.12c	SPBC1685.04	bub1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437257	2539740	2539349	276292	275915	SPBC1685.04	SPCC613.11c	SPBC1685.04	meu23	-	B13958-2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437258	2539936	2539936	276480	276480	SPBC1685.05	SPBC1685.05	SPBC1685.05	SPBC1685.05	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437259	2539936	2539807	276480	276357	SPBC1685.05	SPBC1778.10c	SPBC1685.05	ppk21	-	SPBC4C3.11	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437260	2539936	2541061	276480	277576	SPBC1685.05	SPBC83.09c	SPBC1685.05	lin1	-	SPBC83.09c|snu40	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437261	2539700	2539700	276253	276253	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC1685.15c	klp6	klp6	SPBC649.01c|sot2	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437262	2540039	3361269	276579	280345	SPBC16A3.02c	SPBC31A8.01c	SPBC16A3.02c	rtn1	-	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437263	2540035	2540035	276577	276577	SPBC16A3.06	SPBC16A3.06	SPBC16A3.06	SPBC16A3.06	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437264	2539666	2539666	276221	276221	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC16A3.11	eso1	eso1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437265	2539666	2540505	276221	277033	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC3B9.16c	eso1	nup120	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437266	2540135	2540409	276672	276937	SPBC16C6.11	SPBC2D10.11c	rpl3201	nap2	rpl32-1	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437267	9407224	2539631	1028587	276187	SPBC16C6.14	SPBC16G5.16	spo2	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437268	9407224	2540363	1028587	276892	SPBC16C6.14	SPBC2F12.09c	spo2	atf21	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437269	2539899	2540580	276445	277106	SPBC16D10.01c	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC16D10.01c	ran1	SPBC418.03c	pat1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437270	2539899	2540578	276445	277104	SPBC16D10.01c	SPBC26H8.06	SPBC16D10.01c	grx4	SPBC418.03c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437271	2539899	2540409	276445	276937	SPBC16D10.01c	SPBC2D10.11c	SPBC16D10.01c	nap2	SPBC418.03c	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437272	2539899	2541145	276445	277660	SPBC16D10.01c	SPBC651.12c	SPBC16D10.01c	dbl7	SPBC418.03c	SPBC651.12c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437273	2539899	2539538	276445	276100	SPBC16D10.01c	SPCC364.06	SPBC16D10.01c	nap1	SPBC418.03c	nap11	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437274	3361342	2539631	280418	276187	SPBC16D10.07c	SPBC16G5.16	sir2	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437275	3361342	2540318	280418	276848	SPBC16D10.07c	SPBC30B4.04c	sir2	sol1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437276	3361342	2540735	280418	277258	SPBC16D10.07c	SPBC83.03c	sir2	tas3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437277	2540026	2540026	276570	276570	SPBC16D10.08c	SPBC16D10.08c	hsp104	hsp104	SPBC16D10.08c	SPBC16D10.08c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437278	2540020	2540020	276564	276564	SPBC16D10.09	SPBC16D10.09	pcn1	pcn1	pcn	pcn	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437279	2539644	2540578	276199	277104	SPBC16E9.01c	SPBC26H8.06	php4	grx4	SPBP16F5.09c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437280	2539858	2540578	276405	277104	SPBC16E9.06c	SPBC26H8.06	uvi31	grx4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437281	2539968	2539968	276512	276512	SPBC16E9.10c	SPBC16E9.10c	SPBC16E9.10c	SPBC16E9.10c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437282	2539968	2540972	276512	277488	SPBC16E9.10c	SPBC428.15	SPBC16E9.10c	SPBC428.15	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437283	2539968	2540537	276512	277064	SPBC16E9.10c	SPBC56F2.07c	SPBC16E9.10c	SPBC56F2.07c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437284	2539956	2540833	276500	277351	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBC18H10.20c	pub3	any1	-	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437285	2539956	2541133	276500	277648	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBC660.05	pub3	SPBC660.05	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437286	2539956	2541216	276500	277730	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBC776.09	pub3	ste13	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437287	2539956	2541205	276500	277719	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBC839.02	pub3	SPBC839.02	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437288	2539956	2541281	276500	277794	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBC902.04	pub3	rmn1	-	SPBC902.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437289	2539956	2541384	276500	277895	SPBC16E9.11c	SPBP8B7.26	pub3	SPBP8B7.26	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437290	2539733	2539733	276285	276285	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC16E9.12c	pab2	pab2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437291	2539733	2540291	276285	276822	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC337.12	pab2	red5	-	SPBC337.12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437292	2539733	2541281	276285	277794	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC902.04	pab2	rmn1	-	SPBC902.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437293	2539797	2541266	276347	277780	SPBC16G5.14c	SPBP16F5.05c	rps3	yar1	-	SPBP16F5.05c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437294	2539631	2539631	276187	276187	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC16G5.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437295	2539631	2539829	276187	276378	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC17G9.04c	SPBC16G5.16	nup85	-	ptr5	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437296	2539631	2540801	276187	277320	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC18H10.10c	SPBC16G5.16	saf4	-	cwc16|cwf16	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437297	2539631	2540833	276187	277351	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC18H10.20c	SPBC16G5.16	any1	-	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437298	2539631	2540787	276187	277306	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC16G5.16	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437299	2539631	2540580	276187	277106	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC16G5.16	ran1	-	pat1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437300	2539631	2540667	276187	277192	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC211.06	SPBC16G5.16	gfh1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437301	2539631	2540712	276187	277235	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC216.02	SPBC16G5.16	mcp5	-	mug21|num1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437302	2539631	2540629	276187	277155	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC21D10.09c	SPBC16G5.16	rkr1	-	SPBC21D10.09c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437303	2539631	2540470	276187	276998	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC29A10.15	SPBC16G5.16	orc1	-	cdc30|orp1|rid1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437304	2539631	2540328	276187	276858	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC31F10.11c	SPBC16G5.16	cwf4	-	syf3	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437305	2539631	2541011	276187	277526	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC337.14	SPBC16G5.16	rpb4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437306	2539631	2540929	276187	277445	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC354.03	SPBC16G5.16	swd3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437307	2539631	2540133	276187	276670	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC16G5.16	php5	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437308	2539631	2541033	276187	277548	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC3B9.21	SPBC16G5.16	dcp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437309	2539631	2540892	276187	277408	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC530.01	SPBC16G5.16	gyp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437310	2539631	2540259	276187	276790	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC530.08	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC530.08	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437311	2539631	2541082	276187	277597	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC577.11	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC577.11	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437312	2539631	2541133	276187	277648	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC660.05	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC660.05	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437313	2539631	2541137	276187	277652	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC660.06	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC660.06	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437314	2539631	2541184	276187	277698	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC725.17c	SPBC16G5.16	rrn11	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437315	2539631	2541216	276187	277730	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC776.09	SPBC16G5.16	ste13	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437316	2539631	2541201	276187	277715	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC776.13	SPBC16G5.16	cnd1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437317	2539631	2541171	276187	277685	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC887.09c	SPBC16G5.16	sog2	-	SPBC887.09c|lrp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437318	2539631	2541281	276187	277794	SPBC16G5.16	SPBC902.04	SPBC16G5.16	rmn1	-	SPBC902.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437319	2539631	2541306	276187	277818	SPBC16G5.16	SPBP16F5.07	SPBC16G5.16	apm1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437320	2539631	2541322	276187	277834	SPBC16G5.16	SPBP4H10.09	SPBC16G5.16	rsv1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437321	2539631	2539150	276187	275722	SPBC16G5.16	SPCC1020.03	SPBC16G5.16	mmt1	-	SPCC1020.03	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437322	2539631	2539216	276187	275786	SPBC16G5.16	SPCC14G10.04	SPBC16G5.16	SPCC14G10.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437323	2539631	2538843	276187	275424	SPBC16G5.16	SPCC162.08c	SPBC16G5.16	nup211	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437324	2539631	2539194	276187	275765	SPBC16G5.16	SPCC1682.07	SPBC16G5.16	ssl1	-	tfh47	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437325	2539631	2539137	276187	275709	SPBC16G5.16	SPCC1682.08c	SPBC16G5.16	mcp2	-	SPCC1682.08c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437326	2539631	2539366	276187	275932	SPBC16G5.16	SPCC16C4.11	SPBC16G5.16	pef1	-	p31	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437327	2539631	2539187	276187	275758	SPBC16G5.16	SPCC16C4.14c	SPBC16G5.16	sfc4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437328	2539631	2539041	276187	275614	SPBC16G5.16	SPCC18.06c	SPBC16G5.16	caf1	-	pop2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437329	2539631	2539351	276187	275917	SPBC16G5.16	SPCC1840.11	SPBC16G5.16	csl4	-	SPCC965.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437330	2539631	2538988	276187	275562	SPBC16G5.16	SPCC188.11	SPBC16G5.16	prp45	-	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437331	2539631	2539017	276187	275590	SPBC16G5.16	SPCC338.13	SPBC16G5.16	cog4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437332	2539631	2539502	276187	276065	SPBC16G5.16	SPCC4G3.06c	SPBC16G5.16	mrpl4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437333	2539631	2539360	276187	275926	SPBC16G5.16	SPCC613.04c	SPBC16G5.16	rng3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437334	2539631	2539454	276187	276017	SPBC16G5.16	SPCC622.15c	SPBC16G5.16	SPCC622.15c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437335	2539631	2539423	276187	275988	SPBC16G5.16	SPCC663.12	SPBC16G5.16	cid12	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437336	2539631	2539540	276187	276102	SPBC16G5.16	SPCC736.12c	SPBC16G5.16	mmi1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437337	2539906	2539906	276452	276452	SPBC16G5.17	SPBC16G5.17	SPBC16G5.17	SPBC16G5.17	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437338	2539906	2540133	276452	276670	SPBC16G5.17	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC16G5.17	php5	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437339	2539906	2541161	276452	277676	SPBC16G5.17	SPBC725.11c	SPBC16G5.17	php2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437340	2539906	2541184	276452	277698	SPBC16G5.17	SPBC725.17c	SPBC16G5.17	rrn11	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437341	2540072	2539161	276610	275733	SPBC16H5.07c	SPCC63.05	ppa2	tap42	-	SPCC63.05	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437342	2540086	2540363	276624	276892	SPBC16H5.12c	SPBC2F12.09c	SPBC16H5.12c	atf21	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437343	2539947	2540409	276491	276937	SPBC1703.01c	SPBC2D10.11c	pop4	nap2	SPBC1703.01c|SPBP4H10.22c	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437344	2540120	2540120	276657	276657	SPBC1703.12	SPBC1703.12	ubp9	ubp9	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437345	2539642	2539047	276197	275620	SPBC1706.01	SPCC1223.06	tea4	tea1	wsh3	alp8	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437346	2539820	2540630	276370	277156	SPBC1709.13c	SPBC25D12.03c	set10	mcm7	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437347	2539820	2540318	276370	276848	SPBC1709.13c	SPBC30B4.04c	set10	sol1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437348	2539820	2541039	276370	277554	SPBC1709.13c	SPBC3B9.19	set10	mge1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437349	2539820	2540735	276370	277258	SPBC1709.13c	SPBC83.03c	set10	tas3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437350	2539870	2539216	276416	275786	SPBC1709.18	SPCC14G10.04	tif452	SPCC14G10.04	SPBC409.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437351	2539884	2539884	276430	276430	SPBC1711.04	SPBC1711.04	SPBC1711.04	SPBC1711.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437352	2539884	2540462	276430	276990	SPBC1711.04	SPBC29A3.07c	SPBC1711.04	sap14	-	sab14|SF3b14a	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437353	2539884	2541050	276430	277565	SPBC1711.04	SPBC428.05c	SPBC1711.04	arg12	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437354	2539687	2541125	276242	277640	SPBC1711.05	SPBC409.13	SPBC1711.05	rib4	-	SPBC409.13	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437355	2539687	2538694	276242	275279	SPBC1711.05	SPCC191.09c	SPBC1711.05	gst1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437356	2539806	2541338	276356	277849	SPBC1711.08	SPBP4H10.05c	aha1	spe2	SPBC1711.08	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437357	2539824	2539317	276374	275883	SPBC1711.11	SPCC16A11.08	SPBC1711.11	atg20	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437358	2539720	2540409	276273	276937	SPBC1711.14	SPBC2D10.11c	rec15	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437359	2539789	2540409	276339	276937	SPBC1711.16	SPBC2D10.11c	pwp1	nap2	SPBC1711.16	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437360	2539789	2540846	276339	277363	SPBC1711.16	SPBC428.14	pwp1	SPBC428.14	SPBC1711.16	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437361	2539789	2539093	276339	275665	SPBC1711.16	SPCC736.15	pwp1	pil1	SPBC1711.16	SPCC736.15	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437362	2539675	2540989	276230	277505	SPBC1718.03	SPBC3B9.07c	ker1	rpa43	-	rpa21	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437363	2539958	2538952	276502	275526	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC1235.10c	zfs1	sec6	moc4	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437364	2539851	2539851	276399	276399	SPBC1734.03	SPBC1734.03	SPBC1734.03	SPBC1734.03	SPBC337.19	SPBC337.19	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437365	2539686	2539686	276241	276241	SPBC1734.06	SPBC1734.06	rhp18	rhp18	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437366	2539970	2539970	276514	276514	SPBC1773.01	SPBC1773.01	far8	far8	SPBC1773.01|csc3	SPBC1773.01|csc3	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437367	2539970	2541171	276514	277685	SPBC1773.01	SPBC887.09c	far8	sog2	SPBC1773.01|csc3	SPBC887.09c|lrp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437368	2539964	2539964	276508	276508	SPBC1773.03c	SPBC1773.03c	SPBC1773.03c	SPBC1773.03c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437369	2540119	2540119	276656	276656	SPBC1773.05c	SPBC1773.05c	tms1	tms1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437370	2540139	2540139	276676	276676	SPBC1773.06c	SPBC1773.06c	adh8	adh8	SPBC1773.06c	SPBC1773.06c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437371	2540139	2539111	276676	275683	SPBC1773.06c	SPCC417.11c	adh8	SPCC417.11c	SPBC1773.06c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437372	2540137	2539785	276674	276335	SPBC1773.12	SPBC1773.16c	SPBC1773.12	SPBC1773.16c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437373	2539980	2539980	276524	276524	SPBC1773.14	SPBC1773.14	arg7	arg7	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437374	2539785	2539785	276335	276335	SPBC1773.16c	SPBC1773.16c	SPBC1773.16c	SPBC1773.16c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437375	2539785	2540514	276335	277042	SPBC1773.16c	SPBC19F5.02c	SPBC1773.16c	utp4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437376	2539785	2540712	276335	277235	SPBC1773.16c	SPBC216.02	SPBC1773.16c	mcp5	-	mug21|num1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437377	2539785	2540462	276335	276990	SPBC1773.16c	SPBC29A3.07c	SPBC1773.16c	sap14	-	sab14|SF3b14a	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437378	2539785	2540929	276335	277445	SPBC1773.16c	SPBC354.03	SPBC1773.16c	swd3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437379	2539785	2540892	276335	277408	SPBC1773.16c	SPBC530.01	SPBC1773.16c	gyp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437380	2539785	2541133	276335	277648	SPBC1773.16c	SPBC660.05	SPBC1773.16c	SPBC660.05	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437381	2539785	2540569	276335	277096	SPBC1773.16c	SPBC660.17c	SPBC1773.16c	SPBC660.17c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437382	2539785	2541306	276335	277818	SPBC1773.16c	SPBP16F5.07	SPBC1773.16c	apm1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437383	2539785	2539440	276335	276003	SPBC1773.16c	SPCC550.08	SPBC1773.16c	SPCC550.08	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437384	2539785	2538821	276335	275402	SPBC1773.16c	SPCC584.01c	SPBC1773.16c	SPCC584.01c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437385	2540156	2540156	276692	276692	SPBC17A3.07	SPBC17A3.07	pgr1	pgr1	pi039	pi039	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437386	2539788	2539788	276338	276338	SPBC17D1.02	SPBC17D1.02	dph2	dph2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437387	2539933	2539933	276477	276477	SPBC17D11.06	SPBC17D11.06	spp2	spp2	pri2	pri2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437388	2540191	2540980	276724	277496	SPBC17D11.07c	SPBC342.04	rpn2	rpn1301	-	rpn13|rpn13a	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437389	2539848	2540409	276396	276937	SPBC17G9.07	SPBC2D10.11c	rps2402	nap2	rps24-2	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437390	2539865	2539865	276412	276412	SPBC17G9.08c	SPBC17G9.08c	cnt5	cnt5	csx2	csx2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437391	2539827	2539827	276376	276376	SPBC1861.02	SPBC1861.02	abp2	abp2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437392	2539730	2539730	276282	276282	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC1861.08c	lea1	lea1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437393	2539730	2541219	276282	277733	SPBC1861.08c	SPBC8D2.09c	lea1	msl1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437394	2540803	2539111	277322	275683	SPBC1861.09	SPCC417.11c	ppk22	SPCC417.11c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437395	2540804	2538952	277323	275526	SPBC18E5.03c	SPCC1235.10c	sim4	sec6	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437396	2540822	2540979	277340	277495	SPBC18E5.05c	SPBC3H7.10	elp5	elp6	iki1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437397	2540806	2541144	277325	277659	SPBC18E5.06	SPBC685.06	rps21	rps001	-	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437398	2540801	2538952	277320	275526	SPBC18H10.10c	SPCC1235.10c	saf4	sec6	cwc16|cwf16	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437399	2540801	2538843	277320	275424	SPBC18H10.10c	SPCC162.08c	saf4	nup211	cwc16|cwf16	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437400	5802781	2538752	857919	275335	SPBC18H10.13	SPCC830.11c	rps1402	fap7	rps14-2	SPCC830.11c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437401	2540833	2541209	277351	277723	SPBC18H10.20c	SPBC887.10	any1	mcs4	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437402	2540787	2540436	277306	276964	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC28F2.10c	sgf29	ngg1	SPBC21D10.13	ada3|kap1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437403	2540787	2540318	277306	276848	SPBC1921.07c	SPBC30B4.04c	sgf29	sol1	SPBC21D10.13	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437404	2540580	2540580	277106	277106	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC19C2.05	ran1	ran1	pat1	pat1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437405	2540580	2540350	277106	276879	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC317.01	ran1	mbx2	pat1	pvg4	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437406	2540580	2540133	277106	276670	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC3B8.02	ran1	php5	pat1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437407	2540580	2541137	277106	277652	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC660.06	ran1	SPBC660.06	pat1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437408	2540580	2541322	277106	277834	SPBC19C2.05	SPBP4H10.09	ran1	rsv1	pat1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437409	2540580	2539454	277106	276017	SPBC19C2.05	SPCC622.15c	ran1	SPCC622.15c	pat1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437410	2540580	2539093	277106	275665	SPBC19C2.05	SPCC736.15	ran1	pil1	pat1	SPCC736.15	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437411	2540730	2540730	277253	277253	SPBC19C2.09	SPBC19C2.09	sre1	sre1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437412	2540730	2540289	277253	276820	SPBC19C2.09	SPBC31E1.04	sre1	pep12	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437413	2540730	2539075	277253	275647	SPBC19C2.09	SPCC1281.03c	sre1	emc4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437414	2540602	2541195	277128	277709	SPBC19F5.04	SPBC839.17c	SPBC19F5.04	fkh1	-	SPBC24E9.17c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437415	2540778	2541033	277297	277548	SPBC19G7.10c	SPBC3B9.21	SPBC19G7.10c	dcp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437416	2540778	2540520	277297	277048	SPBC19G7.10c	SPBC3D6.08c	SPBC19G7.10c	lsm1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437417	2540778	2541216	277297	277730	SPBC19G7.10c	SPBC776.09	SPBC19G7.10c	ste13	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437418	2540778	2541306	277297	277818	SPBC19G7.10c	SPBP16F5.07	SPBC19G7.10c	apm1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437419	2540778	2538804	277297	275385	SPBC19G7.10c	SPCC1620.01c	SPBC19G7.10c	lsm2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437420	2540778	2538964	277297	275538	SPBC19G7.10c	SPCC285.12	SPBC19G7.10c	lsm7	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437421	2540283	2540283	276814	276814	SPBC1A4.02c	SPBC1A4.02c	leu1	leu1	SPBC1E8.07c	SPBC1E8.07c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437422	2540283	2540406	276814	276934	SPBC1A4.02c	SPBC30D10.02	leu1	SPBC30D10.02	SPBC1E8.07c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437423	2540567	2541054	277094	277569	SPBC1A4.08c	SPBC3B8.08	cct3	SPBC3B8.08	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437424	2540678	2540678	277203	277203	SPBC1A4.10c	SPBC1A4.10c	pmc1	pmc1	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	SPBP23A10.01c|med14	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437425	2540612	2538967	277138	275541	SPBC1D7.05	SPCC330.04c	byr2	mug135	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437426	2540552	2540552	277079	277079	SPBC1E8.05	SPBC1E8.05	SPBC1E8.05	SPBC1E8.05	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437427	2540723	2541281	277246	277794	SPBC20F10.09	SPBC902.04	lsm5	rmn1	-	SPBC902.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437428	2540723	2538964	277246	275538	SPBC20F10.09	SPCC285.12	lsm5	lsm7	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437429	2540753	2540852	277274	277369	SPBC211.02c	SPBC428.12c	cwf3	SPBC428.12c	syf1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437430	2540753	2538787	277274	275368	SPBC211.02c	SPCC364.02c	cwf3	bis1	syf1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437431	2540784	2541161	277303	277676	SPBC211.04c	SPBC725.11c	mcm6	php2	mis5	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437432	2540784	2538838	277303	275419	SPBC211.04c	SPCC1682.02c	mcm6	mcm3	mis5	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437433	2540667	2540133	277192	276670	SPBC211.06	SPBC3B8.02	gfh1	php5	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437434	2540667	2540735	277192	277258	SPBC211.06	SPBC83.03c	gfh1	tas3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437435	2540738	2540772	277261	277292	SPBC211.07c	SPBC216.04c	ubc8	mxr2	-	SPBC216.04c|MsrB	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437436	2540455	2540455	276983	276983	SPBC215.05	SPBC215.05	gpd1	gpd1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437437	2540725	2540725	277248	277248	SPBC215.14c	SPBC215.14c	vps20	vps20	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437438	2540725	2541147	277248	277662	SPBC215.14c	SPBC651.05c	vps20	dot2	-	vps22	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437439	2540716	2541273	277239	277787	SPBC215.15	SPBC8D2.20c	sec13	sec31	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437440	2540712	2540712	277235	277235	SPBC216.02	SPBC216.02	mcp5	mcp5	mug21|num1	mug21|num1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437441	2540712	2540430	277235	276958	SPBC216.02	SPBC25B2.01	mcp5	SPBC25B2.01	mug21|num1	SPBC2G5.08	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437442	2540712	2540735	277235	277258	SPBC216.02	SPBC83.03c	mcp5	tas3	mug21|num1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437443	2540712	2541281	277235	277794	SPBC216.02	SPBC902.04	mcp5	rmn1	mug21|num1	SPBC902.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437444	2540712	2538952	277235	275526	SPBC216.02	SPCC1235.10c	mcp5	sec6	mug21|num1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437445	2540712	2538903	277235	275481	SPBC216.02	SPCC16C4.02c	mcp5	SPCC16C4.02c	mug21|num1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437446	2540728	3361323	277251	280399	SPBC216.06c	SPBC30D10.04	swi1	swi3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437447	2540645	2540903	277170	277419	SPBC21B10.05c	SPBC530.05	pop3	prt1	wat1	SPBC530.05	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437448	2540645	2538933	277170	275509	SPBC21B10.05c	SPCC191.05c	pop3	SPCC191.05c	wat1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437449	2540622	2540409	277148	276937	SPBC21C3.05	SPBC2D10.11c	sap62	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437450	2540625	2540625	277151	277151	SPBC21C3.10c	SPBC21C3.10c	SPBC21C3.10c	SPBC21C3.10c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437451	2540629	2539349	277155	275915	SPBC21D10.09c	SPCC613.11c	rkr1	meu23	SPBC21D10.09c	B13958-2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437452	2540686	2539000	277211	275574	SPBC21D10.10	SPCC1450.06c	bdc1	grx3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437453	2540540	2540540	277067	277067	SPBC23E6.10c	SPBC23E6.10c	SPBC23E6.10c	SPBC23E6.10c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437454	2540651	2540651	277176	277176	SPBC244.02c	SPBC244.02c	SPBC244.02c	SPBC244.02c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437455	2540317	2541412	276847	277920	SPBC24C6.05	SPBPJ4664.04	sec28	SPBPJ4664.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437456	2540630	2538838	277156	275419	SPBC25D12.03c	SPCC1682.02c	mcm7	mcm3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437457	2540563	2539495	277090	276058	SPBC25H2.09	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC25H2.09	ptc1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437458	2540408	2540408	276936	276936	SPBC25H2.11c	SPBC25H2.11c	spt7	spt7	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437459	2540526	2540526	277054	277054	SPBC26H8.01	SPBC26H8.01	thi2	thi2	nmt2	nmt2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437460	2540559	2541010	277086	277525	SPBC26H8.04c	SPBC354.14c	SPBC26H8.04c	vac8	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437461	2540578	2540921	277104	277437	SPBC26H8.06	SPBC337.10c	grx4	SPBC337.10c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437462	2540474	2540474	277002	277002	SPBC26H8.09c	SPBC26H8.09c	snf59	snf59	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437463	2540422	2540422	276950	276950	SPBC27.08c	SPBC27.08c	sua1	sua1	SPBC28F2.01c|asp1|met3	SPBC28F2.01c|asp1|met3	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437464	2540593	2540593	277119	277119	SPBC28E12.03	SPBC28E12.03	rga4	rga4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437465	2540593	2540315	277119	276845	SPBC28E12.03	SPBC2F12.14c	rga4	gua1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437466	2540637	2540350	277163	276879	SPBC29A10.02	SPBC317.01	spo5	mbx2	SPBC365.18|mrb1|mug12	pvg4	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437467	2540429	2539185	276957	275756	SPBC29A10.07	SPCC737.03c	pom152	ima1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437468	2540470	2540735	276998	277258	SPBC29A10.15	SPBC83.03c	orc1	tas3	cdc30|orp1|rid1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437469	2540462	2541240	276990	277754	SPBC29A3.07c	SPBC8D2.11	sap14	SPBC8D2.11	sab14|SF3b14a	pI054	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437470	2540513	2540409	277041	276937	SPBC29A3.08	SPBC2D10.11c	pof4	nap2	-	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437471	2540513	2538843	277041	275424	SPBC29A3.08	SPCC162.08c	pof4	nup211	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437472	2540513	2538903	277041	275481	SPBC29A3.08	SPCC16C4.02c	pof4	SPCC16C4.02c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437473	2540367	2540409	276896	276937	SPBC29A3.12	SPBC2D10.11c	rps902	nap2	rps9-2|rps9b	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437474	2540507	2538952	277035	275526	SPBC29A3.15c	SPCC1235.10c	rsm23	sec6	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437475	2540324	2539495	276854	276058	SPBC29A3.16	SPCC4F11.02	rrs1	ptc1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437476	2540329	2540329	276859	276859	SPBC29B5.01	SPBC29B5.01	atf1	atf1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437477	2540329	2539423	276859	275988	SPBC29B5.01	SPCC663.12	atf1	cid12	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437478	2540484	2541306	277012	277818	SPBC2A9.09	SPBP16F5.07	plp2	apm1	SPBC2A9.09	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437479	2540433	2540234	276961	276766	SPBC2D10.06	SPBC336.12c	rep1	cdc10	rec16	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437480	2540433	2541306	276961	277818	SPBC2D10.06	SPBP16F5.07	rep1	apm1	rec16	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437481	2540394	2541142	276922	277657	SPBC2D10.09	SPBC725.04	snr1	SPBC725.04	SPBC2D10.09	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437482	2540394	2538952	276922	275526	SPBC2D10.09	SPCC1235.10c	snr1	sec6	SPBC2D10.09	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437483	2540409	2540409	276937	276937	SPBC2D10.11c	SPBC2D10.11c	nap2	nap2	nap1.2|nap12	nap1.2|nap12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437484	2540409	2540373	276937	276902	SPBC2D10.11c	SPBC2G2.05	nap2	rpl1603	nap1.2|nap12	rpl16c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437485	2540409	2540475	276937	277003	SPBC2D10.11c	SPBC30D10.06	nap2	lsm4	nap1.2|nap12	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437486	2540409	2540249	276937	276781	SPBC2D10.11c	SPBC32F12.08c	nap2	duo1	nap1.2|nap12	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437487	2540409	2540880	276937	277397	SPBC2D10.11c	SPBC582.03	nap2	cdc13	nap1.2|nap12	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437488	2540409	2541156	276937	277671	SPBC2D10.11c	SPBC685.07c	nap2	rpl2701	nap1.2|nap12	rpl27-1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437489	2540409	2541130	276937	277645	SPBC2D10.11c	SPBC776.11	nap2	rpl2801	nap1.2|nap12	rpl28-1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437490	2540409	2540781	276937	277300	SPBC2D10.11c	SPBC83.06c	nap2	SPBC83.06c	nap1.2|nap12	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437491	2540409	2541191	276937	277705	SPBC2D10.11c	SPBC839.04	nap2	rpl803	nap1.2|nap12	rpk5-b|rpkD4|rpl8-3|SPBC24E9.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437492	2540409	2542012	276937	278495	SPBC2D10.11c	SPAC23C11.02c	nap2	rps23	nap1.2|nap12	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437493	2540409	2538815	276937	275396	SPBC2D10.11c	SPCC1322.15	nap2	rpl3402	nap1.2|nap12	rpl34|rpl34-2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437494	2540409	2539299	276937	275867	SPBC2D10.11c	SPCC1672.07	nap2	SPCC1672.07	nap1.2|nap12	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437495	2540409	2538956	276937	275530	SPBC2D10.11c	SPCC1682.13	nap2	laf2	nap1.2|nap12	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437496	2540409	2539538	276937	276100	SPBC2D10.11c	SPCC364.06	nap2	nap1	nap1.2|nap12	nap11	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437497	2540409	2539470	276937	276033	SPBC2D10.11c	SPCC576.11	nap2	rpl15	nap1.2|nap12	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437498	2540409	2539548	276937	276109	SPBC2D10.11c	SPCC5E4.07	nap2	rpl2802	nap1.2|nap12	rpl28|rpl28-2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437499	2540409	2539360	276937	275926	SPBC2D10.11c	SPCC613.04c	nap2	rng3	nap1.2|nap12	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437500	2540409	2539277	276937	275845	SPBC2D10.11c	SPCC663.04	nap2	rpl39	nap1.2|nap12	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437501	2540409	2538883	276937	275461	SPBC2D10.11c	SPCC970.05	nap2	rpl3601	nap1.2|nap12	rpl36-1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437502	2540363	2540999	276892	277515	SPBC2F12.09c	SPBC4B4.04	atf21	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437503	2540315	2540315	276845	276845	SPBC2F12.14c	SPBC2F12.14c	gua1	gua1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437504	2540306	2541210	276836	277724	SPBC2G5.02c	SPBC887.06c	ckb2	snx3	SPBC2G5.02c	grd19	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437505	2540306	2541281	276836	277794	SPBC2G5.02c	SPBC902.04	ckb2	rmn1	SPBC2G5.02c	SPBC902.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437506	2540306	2538994	276836	275568	SPBC2G5.02c	SPCC553.01c	ckb2	dbl2	SPBC2G5.02c	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437507	2540430	2539371	276958	275937	SPBC25B2.01	SPCC18B5.06	SPBC25B2.01	dom34	SPBC2G5.08	SPCC18B5.06|erf1|sup45	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437508	2540419	2540419	276947	276947	SPBC30B4.05	SPBC30B4.05	kap109	kap109	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437509	2540402	2540402	276930	276930	SPBC30D10.05c	SPBC30D10.05c	SPBC30D10.05c	SPBC30D10.05c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437510	2540350	2540350	276879	276879	SPBC317.01	SPBC317.01	mbx2	mbx2	pvg4	pvg4	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437511	2540350	2540249	276879	276781	SPBC317.01	SPBC32F12.08c	mbx2	duo1	pvg4	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437512	2540350	2540929	276879	277445	SPBC317.01	SPBC354.03	mbx2	swd3	pvg4	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437513	2540350	2540133	276879	276670	SPBC317.01	SPBC3B8.02	mbx2	php5	pvg4	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437514	2540350	2541033	276879	277548	SPBC317.01	SPBC3B9.21	mbx2	dcp1	pvg4	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437515	2540350	2541133	276879	277648	SPBC317.01	SPBC660.05	mbx2	SPBC660.05	pvg4	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437516	2540350	2541195	276879	277709	SPBC317.01	SPBC839.17c	mbx2	fkh1	pvg4	SPBC24E9.17c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437517	2540350	2539360	276879	275926	SPBC317.01	SPCC613.04c	mbx2	rng3	pvg4	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437518	3361269	3361269	280345	280345	SPBC31A8.01c	SPBC31A8.01c	rtn1	rtn1	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437519	3361269	2540256	280345	276787	SPBC31A8.01c	SPBC32F12.12c	rtn1	SPBC32F12.12c	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437520	3361269	2540998	280345	277514	SPBC31A8.01c	SPBC3D6.05	rtn1	ptp4	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437521	3361269	2540846	280345	277363	SPBC31A8.01c	SPBC428.14	rtn1	SPBC428.14	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437522	3361269	2541244	280345	277758	SPBC31A8.01c	SPBC8D2.02c	rtn1	vps68	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	SPBC8D2.02c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437523	3361269	2539171	280345	275742	SPBC31A8.01c	SPCC830.08c	rtn1	yop1	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437524	3361269	2539516	280345	276078	SPBC31A8.01c	SPCC970.06	rtn1	SPCC970.06	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437525	2540289	2539185	276820	275756	SPBC31E1.04	SPCC737.03c	pep12	ima1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437526	2540327	2540821	276857	277339	SPBC31F10.07	SPBC800.03	lsb5	clr3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437527	2540272	2539354	276803	275920	SPBC31F10.09c	SPCC4F11.03c	nut2	SPCC4F11.03c	med10	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437528	2540322	2539242	276852	275812	SPBC31F10.10c	SPCC290.04	SPBC31F10.10c	ams2	-	SPCC4F11.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437529	2540328	2540735	276858	277258	SPBC31F10.11c	SPBC83.03c	cwf4	tas3	syf3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437530	2540328	2539149	276858	275721	SPBC31F10.11c	SPCC1739.11c	cwf4	cdc11	syf3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437531	2540396	2540396	276924	276924	SPBC31F10.12	SPBC31F10.12	tma20	tma20	SPBC31F10.12	SPBC31F10.12	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437532	2540240	2539014	276772	275587	SPBC31F10.16	SPCC18B5.05c	SPBC31F10.16	SPCC18B5.05c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437533	2540221	2539136	276754	275708	SPBC32F12.02	SPCC1919.05	rec14	SPCC1919.05	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437534	2540222	2540256	276755	276787	SPBC32F12.03c	SPBC32F12.12c	gpx1	SPBC32F12.12c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437535	2540222	2539171	276755	275742	SPBC32F12.03c	SPCC830.08c	gpx1	yop1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437536	2540249	2538843	276781	275424	SPBC32F12.08c	SPCC162.08c	duo1	nup211	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437537	2540051	2540051	276589	276589	SPBC32H8.12c	SPBC32H8.12c	act1	act1	cps8|pi012	cps8|pi012	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437538	2540234	2540234	276766	276766	SPBC336.12c	SPBC336.12c	cdc10	cdc10	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437539	2540234	2538952	276766	275526	SPBC336.12c	SPCC1235.10c	cdc10	sec6	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437540	2540305	2540305	276835	276835	SPBC337.05c	SPBC337.05c	cct8	cct8	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437541	2540954	2539088	277470	275660	SPBC337.13c	SPCC777.05	gtr1	gtr2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437542	2541011	2540735	277526	277258	SPBC337.14	SPBC83.03c	rpb4	tas3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437543	2540980	2541033	277496	277548	SPBC342.04	SPBC3B9.21	rpn1301	dcp1	rpn13|rpn13a	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437544	2540992	2540880	277508	277397	SPBC342.05	SPBC582.03	crb2	cdc13	rhp9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437545	2540992	2539495	277508	276058	SPBC342.05	SPCC4F11.02	crb2	ptc1	rhp9	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437546	2540303	2538880	276833	275459	SPBC354.01	SPCC1393.09c	gtp1	SPCC1393.09c	SPBC649.06	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437547	2540929	2541159	277445	277674	SPBC354.03	SPBC685.09	swd3	orc2	-	orp2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437548	2540916	2540916	277432	277432	SPBC354.15	SPBC354.15	fap1	fap1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437549	2540377	2539017	276906	275590	SPBC36.08c	SPCC338.13	cog2	cog4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437550	2540931	2541197	277447	277711	SPBC365.07c	SPBC839.12	SPBC365.07c	rpc31	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437551	2540987	2538720	277503	275304	SPBC36B7.05c	SPCC338.05c	SPBC36B7.05c	mms2	-	spm2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437552	2540133	2540133	276670	276670	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC3B8.02	php5	php5	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437553	2540133	2541033	276670	277548	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC3B9.21	php5	dcp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437554	2540133	2540917	276670	277433	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC409.05	php5	skp1	-	psh1|sph1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437555	2540133	2541137	276670	277652	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC660.06	php5	SPBC660.06	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437556	2540133	2541161	276670	277676	SPBC3B8.02	SPBC725.11c	php5	php2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437557	2540133	2541306	276670	277818	SPBC3B8.02	SPBP16F5.07	php5	apm1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437558	2541054	2541054	277569	277569	SPBC3B8.08	SPBC3B8.08	SPBC3B8.08	SPBC3B8.08	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437559	2540299	2538893	276830	275471	SPBC3B9.13c	SPCC18.14c	rpp102	rpp0	rpp1-2|rpa103	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437560	2541065	2541065	277580	277580	SPBC3B9.15c	SPBC3B9.15c	scp1	scp1	scap	scap	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437561	2540982	2539581	277498	276140	SPBC3B9.18c	SPCC965.03	vma7	vma8	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437562	2541039	2541039	277554	277554	SPBC3B9.19	SPBC3B9.19	mge1	mge1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437563	2540977	2540977	277493	277493	SPBC3E7.02c	SPBC3E7.02c	hsp16	hsp16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437564	2540977	2540919	277493	277435	SPBC3E7.02c	SPBC543.07	hsp16	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437565	2540330	2540212	276860	276745	SPBC3E7.14	SPBC9B6.05c	smf1	lsm3	SPBC4F6.01	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437566	2540634	2540634	277160	277160	SPBC3F6.02c	SPBC3F6.02c	SPBC3F6.02c	SPBC3F6.02c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437567	2540634	2541110	277160	277625	SPBC3F6.02c	SPBC646.05c	SPBC3F6.02c	erg9	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437568	3361358	3361358	280434	280434	SPBC3F6.03	SPBC3F6.03	trr1	trr1	caf4	caf4	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437569	2540968	2539047	277484	275620	SPBC3H7.07c	SPCC1223.06	ser2	tea1	-	alp8	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437570	2540718	2540735	277241	277258	SPBC3H7.15	SPBC83.03c	hhp1	tas3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437571	2540710	2541164	277233	277679	SPBC4.03c	SPBC776.04	SPBC4.03c	sec2302	-	sec23-b	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437572	2540530	2540530	277058	277058	SPBC405.05	SPBC405.05	atg16	atg16	SPBC405.05	SPBC405.05	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437573	2540773	2541358	277293	277869	SPBC405.06	SPBP4H10.16c	SPBC405.06	SPBP4H10.16c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437574	2540956	2540956	277472	277472	SPBC409.06	SPBC409.06	uch2	uch2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437575	2541055	2541178	277570	277692	SPBC409.07c	SPBC725.02	wis1	mpr1	smf2|spc2	spy1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437576	2541125	2541125	277640	277640	SPBC409.13	SPBC409.13	rib4	rib4	SPBC409.13	SPBC409.13	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437577	2540813	2540537	277332	277064	SPBC409.15	SPBC56F2.07c	SPBC409.15	SPBC56F2.07c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437578	2541050	2541050	277565	277565	SPBC428.05c	SPBC428.05c	arg12	arg12	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437579	2540689	2540689	277214	277214	SPBC428.06c	SPBC428.06c	rxt2	rxt2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437580	2540776	2540776	277296	277296	SPBC428.07	SPBC428.07	meu6	meu6	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437581	2540825	2540825	277343	277343	SPBC428.08c	SPBC428.08c	clr4	clr4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437582	2540849	2539426	277366	275991	SPBC428.11	SPCC962.03c	met17	cut15	SPBC428.11|cys2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437583	2540862	2540824	277379	277342	SPBC4C3.06	SPBC800.10c	syp1	SPBC800.10c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437584	2540892	2538952	277408	275526	SPBC530.01	SPCC1235.10c	gyp1	sec6	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437585	2540903	2540903	277419	277419	SPBC530.05	SPBC530.05	prt1	prt1	SPBC530.05	SPBC530.05	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437586	2540903	2541133	277419	277648	SPBC530.05	SPBC660.05	prt1	SPBC660.05	SPBC530.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437587	2541068	2541081	277583	277596	SPBC530.11c	SPBC691.02c	SPBC530.11c	drp1	-	SPBC691.02c|pi034|SPACTOKYO_453.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437588	2539847	2541287	276395	277800	SPBC530.14c	SPBP22H7.05c	dsk1	abo2	-	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437589	2540261	2540261	276792	276792	SPBC543.05c	SPBC543.05c	SPBC543.05c	SPBC543.05c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437590	2540919	2538744	277435	275327	SPBC543.07	SPCC306.03c	pek1	cnd2	mkk1|skh1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437591	2540912	2538967	277428	275541	SPBC557.02c	SPCC330.04c	SPBC557.02c	mug135	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437592	2540914	2540914	277430	277430	SPBC56F2.01	SPBC56F2.01	pof12	pof12	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437593	2540537	2540537	277064	277064	SPBC56F2.07c	SPBC56F2.07c	SPBC56F2.07c	SPBC56F2.07c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437594	2540848	2540848	277365	277365	SPBC56F2.11	SPBC56F2.11	met6	met6	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437595	2541082	2538952	277597	275526	SPBC577.11	SPCC1235.10c	SPBC577.11	sec6	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437596	2540880	2540880	277397	277397	SPBC582.03	SPBC582.03	cdc13	cdc13	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437597	2540880	2541159	277397	277674	SPBC582.03	SPBC685.09	cdc13	orc2	-	orp2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437598	2540880	2539149	277397	275721	SPBC582.03	SPCC1739.11c	cdc13	cdc11	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437599	2540891	2539581	277407	276140	SPBC582.08	SPCC965.03	SPBC582.08	vma8	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437600	2540907	2540907	277423	277423	SPBC582.10c	SPBC582.10c	SPBC582.10c	SPBC582.10c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437601	2541063	2541063	277578	277578	SPBC646.15c	SPBC646.15c	pex16	pex16	SPBC646.15c	SPBC646.15c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437602	2541137	2541137	277652	277652	SPBC660.06	SPBC660.06	SPBC660.06	SPBC660.06	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437603	2541137	2539454	277652	276017	SPBC660.06	SPCC622.15c	SPBC660.06	SPCC622.15c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437604	2541185	2541061	277699	277576	SPBC6B1.07	SPBC83.09c	prp1	lin1	zer1	SPBC83.09c|snu40	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437605	2541185	2539369	277699	275935	SPBC6B1.07	SPCC16A11.05c	prp1	dim1	zer1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437606	2541179	2541179	277693	277693	SPBC6B1.08c	SPBC6B1.08c	ofd1	ofd1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437607	2541179	2539438	277693	276001	SPBC6B1.08c	SPCC4B3.07	ofd1	nro1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437608	2541131	2541131	277646	277646	SPBC713.02c	SPBC713.02c	ubp15	ubp15	ubp21|ubpD	ubp21|ubpD	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437609	2541182	2541323	277696	277835	SPBC713.04c	SPBP35G2.14	pwp2	SPBP35G2.14	SPBC713.04c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437610	2541178	2541209	277692	277723	SPBC725.02	SPBC887.10	mpr1	mcs4	spy1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437611	2541178	2539117	277692	275689	SPBC725.02	SPCC74.06	mpr1	mak3	spy1	phk2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437612	2541194	2541368	277708	277879	SPBC725.13c	SPBP4H10.21c	psf2	sld5	bsh3|dre13	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437613	2541184	2538952	277698	275526	SPBC725.17c	SPCC1235.10c	rrn11	sec6	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437614	2541216	2540735	277730	277258	SPBC776.09	SPBC83.03c	ste13	tas3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437615	2541216	2541323	277730	277835	SPBC776.09	SPBP35G2.14	ste13	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437616	2541207	2541207	277721	277721	SPBC776.10c	SPBC776.10c	cog6	cog6	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437617	2541201	2540735	277715	277258	SPBC776.13	SPBC83.03c	cnd1	tas3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437618	2541201	2538744	277715	275327	SPBC776.13	SPCC306.03c	cnd1	cnd2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437619	2540821	2540821	277339	277339	SPBC800.03	SPBC800.03	clr3	clr3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437620	2540496	2538964	277024	275538	SPBC800.11	SPCC285.12	SPBC800.11	lsm7	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437621	2540807	2538767	277326	275350	SPBC800.12c	SPCC1672.12c	SPBC800.12c	get4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437622	2540735	2540735	277258	277258	SPBC83.03c	SPBC83.03c	tas3	tas3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437623	2540735	2541337	277258	277848	SPBC83.03c	SPBP35G2.13c	tas3	swc2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437624	2540735	2541412	277258	277920	SPBC83.03c	SPBPJ4664.04	tas3	SPBPJ4664.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437625	2540735	2538843	277258	275424	SPBC83.03c	SPCC162.08c	tas3	nup211	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437626	2540735	2539187	277258	275758	SPBC83.03c	SPCC16C4.14c	tas3	sfc4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437627	2540735	2539488	277258	276051	SPBC83.03c	SPCC645.08c	tas3	snd1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437628	2541188	2539171	277702	275742	SPBC83.16c	SPCC830.08c	SPBC83.16c	yop1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437629	2541214	2538826	277728	275407	SPBC839.07	SPCC1442.16c	ibp1	zta1	-	SPCC285.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437630	2541197	2541197	277711	277711	SPBC839.12	SPBC839.12	rpc31	rpc31	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437631	2541197	2539538	277711	276100	SPBC839.12	SPCC364.06	rpc31	nap1	-	nap11	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437632	2541197	2538808	277711	275389	SPBC839.12	SPCPB16A4.05c	rpc31	SPCPB16A4.05c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437633	2541210	2539171	277724	275742	SPBC887.06c	SPCC830.08c	snx3	yop1	grd19	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437634	2541222	2538996	277736	275570	SPBC887.08	SPCC777.15	SPBC887.08	SPCC777.15	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437635	2541209	2541209	277723	277723	SPBC887.10	SPBC887.10	mcs4	mcs4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437636	2541209	2539401	277723	275966	SPBC887.10	SPCC63.12c	mcs4	pup3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437637	2541242	2538903	277756	275481	SPBC8D2.05c	SPCC16C4.02c	sfi1	SPCC16C4.02c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437638	2541240	2541240	277754	277754	SPBC8D2.11	SPBC8D2.11	SPBC8D2.11	SPBC8D2.11	pI054	pI054	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437639	2541263	2539096	277777	275668	SPBC8D2.14c	SPCC74.01	sed5	sly1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437640	2541281	2541281	277794	277794	SPBC902.04	SPBC902.04	rmn1	rmn1	SPBC902.04	SPBC902.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437641	2541281	2538952	277794	275526	SPBC902.04	SPCC1235.10c	rmn1	sec6	SPBC902.04	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437642	2541281	2539140	277794	275712	SPBC902.04	SPCC1259.11c	rmn1	gyp2	SPBC902.04	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437643	2541281	2538843	277794	275424	SPBC902.04	SPCC162.08c	rmn1	nup211	SPBC902.04	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437644	2540212	2540212	276745	276745	SPBC9B6.05c	SPBC9B6.05c	lsm3	lsm3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437645	2540212	2538804	276745	275385	SPBC9B6.05c	SPCC1620.01c	lsm3	lsm2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437646	2540212	2539322	276745	275888	SPBC9B6.05c	SPCC1840.10	lsm3	lsm8	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437647	2541306	2541373	277818	277884	SPBP16F5.07	SPBP8B7.18c	apm1	SPBP8B7.18c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437648	2541306	2539093	277818	275665	SPBP16F5.07	SPCC736.15	apm1	pil1	-	SPCC736.15	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437649	2541287	2541287	277800	277800	SPBP22H7.05c	SPBP22H7.05c	abo2	abo2	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437650	2541287	2541355	277800	277866	SPBP22H7.05c	SPBP8B7.19	abo2	spt16	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437651	2540160	2540160	276695	276695	SPBC1773.17c	SPBC1773.17c	SPBC1773.17c	SPBC1773.17c	SPBP26C9.01c	SPBP26C9.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437652	2541337	2541337	277848	277848	SPBP35G2.13c	SPBP35G2.13c	swc2	swc2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437653	2541323	2541323	277835	277835	SPBP35G2.14	SPBP35G2.14	SPBP35G2.14	SPBP35G2.14	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437654	2541338	2541338	277849	277849	SPBP4H10.05c	SPBP4H10.05c	spe2	spe2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437655	2541358	2539285	277869	275853	SPBP4H10.16c	SPCC1672.02c	SPBP4H10.16c	sap1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437656	2541362	2541362	277873	277873	SPBP8B7.05c	SPBP8B7.05c	nce103	nce103	SPBP8B7.05c	SPBP8B7.05c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437657	2541362	2538916	277873	275493	SPBP8B7.05c	SPCC16C4.17	nce103	mug123	SPBP8B7.05c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437658	2541362	2539210	277873	275780	SPBP8B7.05c	SPCC2H8.05c	nce103	dbl1	SPBP8B7.05c	SPCC2H8.05c|SPCC63.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437659	2541311	2539500	277823	276063	SPBP8B7.09c	SPCC61.03	los1	SPCC61.03	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437660	2540207	2539014	276740	275587	SPBP8B7.17c	SPCC18B5.05c	SPBP8B7.17c	SPCC18B5.05c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437661	2541373	2541373	277884	277884	SPBP8B7.18c	SPBP8B7.18c	SPBP8B7.18c	SPBP8B7.18c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437662	2541386	2539242	277897	275812	SPBP8B7.24c	SPCC290.04	atg8	ams2	-	SPCC4F11.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437663	2541384	2541384	277895	277895	SPBP8B7.26	SPBP8B7.26	SPBP8B7.26	SPBP8B7.26	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437664	2541397	2541397	277906	277906	SPBPB2B2.08	SPBPB2B2.08	SPBPB2B2.08	SPBPB2B2.08	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437665	2539150	2539150	275722	275722	SPCC1020.03	SPCC1020.03	mmt1	mmt1	SPCC1020.03	SPCC1020.03	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437666	2538977	2538977	275551	275551	SPCC1020.06c	SPCC1020.06c	tal1	tal1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437667	2539015	2539275	275588	275843	SPCC1183.02	SPCC1450.04	SPCC1183.02	tef5	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437668	2539222	2539222	275792	275792	SPCC1183.08c	SPCC1183.08c	rpl101	rpl101	rpl1-1|rpl10a-1	rpl1-1|rpl10a-1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437669	2539050	2539050	275623	275623	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC11E10.08	rik1	rik1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437670	2539050	2538848	275623	275429	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC613.12c	rik1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437671	2539047	2539487	275620	276050	SPCC1223.06	SPCC895.05	tea1	for3	alp8	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437672	2538701	2538701	275286	275286	SPCC1235.09	SPCC1235.09	hif2	hif2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437673	2538952	2539137	275526	275709	SPCC1235.10c	SPCC1682.08c	sec6	mcp2	-	SPCC1682.08c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437674	2538952	2538787	275526	275368	SPCC1235.10c	SPCC364.02c	sec6	bis1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437675	2538952	2538994	275526	275568	SPCC1235.10c	SPCC553.01c	sec6	dbl2	-	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437676	2538952	2538963	275526	275537	SPCC1235.10c	SPCC777.08c	sec6	bit61	-	SPCC777.08	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437677	2539140	2538994	275712	275568	SPCC1259.11c	SPCC553.01c	gyp2	dbl2	-	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437678	2539062	2539062	275634	275634	SPCC126.10	SPCC126.10	iah1	iah1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437679	2538736	2538736	275320	275320	SPCC1322.12c	SPCC1322.12c	bub1	bub1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437680	2538736	2539219	275320	275789	SPCC1322.12c	SPCC1795.01c	bub1	mad3	-	SPCC895.02	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437681	2538731	2538731	275315	275315	SPCC1393.10	SPCC1393.10	ctr4	ctr4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437682	3361128	3361128	280204	280204	SPCC1442.04c	SPCC1442.04c	SPCC1442.04c	SPCC1442.04c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437683	2538824	2538824	275405	275405	SPCC1442.14c	SPCC1442.14c	hnt1	hnt1	SPCC1442.14c	SPCC1442.14c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437684	2538826	2538826	275407	275407	SPCC1442.16c	SPCC1442.16c	zta1	zta1	SPCC285.01c	SPCC285.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437685	2538955	2538967	275529	275541	SPCC1450.02	SPCC330.04c	bdf1	mug135	SPCC191.13|brf1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437686	2539216	2538843	275786	275424	SPCC14G10.04	SPCC162.08c	SPCC14G10.04	nup211	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437687	2538843	2538843	275424	275424	SPCC162.08c	SPCC162.08c	nup211	nup211	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437688	2538843	2538988	275424	275562	SPCC162.08c	SPCC188.11	nup211	prp45	-	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437689	2538843	2538787	275424	275368	SPCC162.08c	SPCC364.02c	nup211	bis1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437690	2539285	2539285	275853	275853	SPCC1672.02c	SPCC1672.02c	sap1	sap1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437691	2539175	2539175	275746	275746	SPCC16C4.01	SPCC16C4.01	sif2	sif2	SPCC5E4.09	SPCC5E4.09	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437692	2538903	9406964	275481	1028327	SPCC16C4.02c	SPCC70.12c	SPCC16C4.02c	ecl1	-	SPNG2611|SPNCRNA.518	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437693	2539366	2539349	275932	275915	SPCC16C4.11	SPCC613.11c	pef1	meu23	p31	B13958-2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437694	2538916	2539093	275493	275665	SPCC16C4.17	SPCC736.15	mug123	pil1	-	SPCC736.15	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437695	2539248	2539423	275818	275988	SPCC1739.03	SPCC663.12	hrr1	cid12	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437696	2539149	2539149	275721	275721	SPCC1739.11c	SPCC1739.11c	cdc11	cdc11	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437697	2538758	2539511	275341	276073	SPCC1739.12	SPCC663.01c	ppe1	ekc1	esp1|ppx1	SPCC777.16c|eck1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437698	2538851	2538885	275432	275463	SPCC18.07	SPCC330.13	rpc53	rpc37	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437699	2539267	2538694	275837	275279	SPCC1827.06c	SPCC191.09c	SPCC1827.06c	gst1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437700	2539036	2539036	275609	275609	SPCC1840.01c	SPCC1840.01c	mog1	mog1	SPCC790.04c	SPCC790.04c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437701	2539121	2538744	275693	275327	SPCC188.03	SPCC306.03c	cnd3	cnd2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437702	2539352	2539352	275918	275918	SPCC188.07	SPCC188.07	ccq1	ccq1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437703	2538921	2538921	275498	275498	SPCC18B5.04	SPCC18B5.04	rsm18	rsm18	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437704	2538959	2539004	275533	275578	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC4G3.05c	cds1	mus81	-	slx3	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437705	2539257	2539257	275827	275827	SPCC1906.03	SPCC1906.03	wtf19	wtf19	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437706	2538694	2538694	275279	275279	SPCC191.09c	SPCC191.09c	gst1	gst1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437707	2538694	2539601	275279	276159	SPCC191.09c	SPCC965.07c	gst1	gst2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437708	2539237	2539237	275807	275807	SPCC24B10.13	SPCC24B10.13	skb5	skb5	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437709	2539237	2539495	275807	276058	SPCC24B10.13	SPCC4F11.02	skb5	ptc1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437710	2538953	2538953	275527	275527	SPCC285.08	SPCC285.08	ret2	ret2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437711	2538964	2538964	275538	275538	SPCC285.12	SPCC285.12	lsm7	lsm7	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437712	2538910	2538910	275487	275487	SPCC320.04c	SPCC320.04c	gem1	gem1	SPCC320.04c	SPCC320.04c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437713	2538704	2538704	275288	275288	SPCC320.07c	SPCC320.07c	mde7	mde7	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437714	2538967	2538967	275541	275541	SPCC330.04c	SPCC330.04c	mug135	mug135	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437715	2538768	2538768	275351	275351	SPCC330.05c	SPCC330.05c	ura4	ura4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437716	2539338	2539534	275904	276096	SPCC338.07c	SPCC663.13c	naa15	naa50	-	nat5	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437717	2539538	2539538	276100	276100	SPCC364.06	SPCC364.06	nap1	nap1	nap11	nap11	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437718	2539111	2539111	275683	275683	SPCC417.11c	SPCC417.11c	SPCC417.11c	SPCC417.11c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437719	2539032	2539032	275605	275605	SPCC4B3.05c	SPCC4B3.05c	hem12	hem12	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437720	2538718	2538718	275302	275302	SPCC4B3.06c	SPCC4B3.06c	SPCC4B3.06c	SPCC4B3.06c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437721	2538790	2538790	275371	275371	SPCC4B3.10c	SPCC4B3.10c	ipk1	ipk1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437722	2539367	2539367	275933	275933	SPCC4B3.18	SPCC4B3.18	ppc1	ppc1	SPCC4B3.18	SPCC4B3.18	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437723	2538852	2538852	275433	275433	SPCC4E9.01c	SPCC4E9.01c	rec11	rec11	SPCC550.16c	SPCC550.16c	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437724	2539292	2539292	275860	275860	SPCC4G3.02	SPCC4G3.02	aph1	aph1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437725	2539406	2539406	275971	275971	SPCC4G3.07c	SPCC4G3.07c	phf1	phf1	saf50|swp1	saf50|swp1	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437726	2539410	2539410	275975	275975	SPCC4G3.17	SPCC4G3.17	SPCC4G3.17	SPCC4G3.17	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437727	2539542	2539542	276104	276104	SPCC4G3.18	SPCC4G3.18	rix1	rix1	SPCC4G3.18	SPCC4G3.18	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437728	2539262	2539262	275832	275832	SPCC550.04c	SPCC550.04c	gpi2	gpi2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437729	2539264	2539264	275834	275834	SPCC550.10	SPCC550.10	atd3	atd3	meu8	meu8	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437730	2539475	2539475	276038	276038	SPCC553.02	SPCC553.02	qns1	qns1	SPCC553.02	SPCC553.02	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437731	2539547	2539547	276108	276108	SPCC553.07c	SPCC553.07c	kpa1	kpa1	mug40|pol(kappa)|pol-kappa	mug40|pol(kappa)|pol-kappa	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437732	2539562	2539562	276123	276123	SPCC569.01c	SPCC569.01c	SPCC569.01c	SPCC569.01c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437733	2539562	2539593	276123	276151	SPCC569.01c	SPCP20C8.01c	SPCC569.01c	SPCP20C8.01c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437734	2538960	2538960	275534	275534	SPCC569.03	SPCC569.03	SPCC569.03	SPCC569.03	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437735	2539531	2539531	276093	276093	SPCC576.02	SPCC576.02	SPCC576.02	SPCC576.02	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437736	2539479	2539479	276042	276042	SPCC584.04	SPCC584.04	sup35	sup35	erf3	erf3	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437737	2539500	2539500	276063	276063	SPCC61.03	SPCC61.03	SPCC61.03	SPCC61.03	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437738	2539360	2539349	275926	275915	SPCC613.04c	SPCC613.11c	rng3	meu23	-	B13958-2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437739	2539349	2539349	275915	275915	SPCC613.11c	SPCC613.11c	meu23	meu23	B13958-2	B13958-2	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437740	2539349	2538963	275915	275537	SPCC613.11c	SPCC777.08c	meu23	bit61	B13958-2	SPCC777.08	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437741	2538707	2538707	275291	275291	SPCC70.07c	SPCC70.07c	tmp1	tmp1	tmp	tmp	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437742	2539093	2539093	275665	275665	SPCC736.15	SPCC736.15	pil1	pil1	SPCC736.15	SPCC736.15	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437743	2539185	2539185	275756	275756	SPCC737.03c	SPCC737.03c	ima1	ima1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437744	2539109	2539109	275681	275681	SPCC74.03c	SPCC74.03c	ssp2	ssp2	ucp9	ucp9	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437745	2539434	2539434	275997	275997	SPCC757.09c	SPCC757.09c	rnc1	rnc1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437746	2538874	2538874	275453	275453	SPCC777.06c	SPCC777.06c	SPCC777.06c	SPCC777.06c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437747	2538879	2538879	275458	275458	SPCC777.12c	SPCC777.12c	SPCC777.12c	SPCC777.12c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437748	2539426	2539432	275991	275995	SPCC962.03c	SPCC965.05c	cut15	thp1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437749	2539573	2539573	276133	276133	SPCC965.06	SPCC965.06	osr2	osr2	SPCC965.06	SPCC965.06	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437750	2539593	2539593	276151	276151	SPCP20C8.01c	SPCP20C8.01c	SPCP20C8.01c	SPCP20C8.01c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437751	2539450	2539450	276013	276013	SPCP31B10.04	SPCP31B10.04	SPCP31B10.04	SPCP31B10.04	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437752	2538808	2538808	275389	275389	SPCPB16A4.05c	SPCPB16A4.05c	SPCPB16A4.05c	SPCPB16A4.05c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437753	2540718	2540735	277241	277258	SPBC3H7.15	SPBC83.03c	hhp1	tas3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437754	2540409	2539277	276937	275845	SPBC2D10.11c	SPCC663.04	nap2	rpl39	nap1.2|nap12	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437755	2543208	2539093	279637	275665	SPAC328.04	SPCC736.15	SPAC328.04	pil1	-	SPCC736.15	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437756	2543580	2543580	279995	279995	SPAC644.14c	SPAC644.14c	rad51	rad51	rhp51	rhp51	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437757	2542042	2539928	278523	276472	SPAC23A1.14c	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC23A1.14c	imp1	-	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437758	2543086	2543580	279519	279995	SPAC30D11.10	SPAC644.14c	rad52	rad51	rad22|rad22A	rhp51	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437759	3361430	2540778	280506	277297	SPAC2F3.12c	SPBC19G7.10c	plp1	SPBC19G7.10c	SPAC2F3.17c	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437760	2539838	2540784	276387	277303	SPBC1347.10	SPBC211.04c	cdc23	mcm6	mcm10	mis5	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437761	2540409	2539538	276937	276100	SPBC2D10.11c	SPCC364.06	nap2	nap1	nap1.2|nap12	nap11	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437762	2539093	2539093	275665	275665	SPCC736.15	SPCC736.15	pil1	pil1	SPCC736.15	SPCC736.15	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437763	2540778	2541216	277297	277730	SPBC19G7.10c	SPBC776.09	SPBC19G7.10c	ste13	-	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437764	2542733	2540439	279183	276967	SPAC6F12.04	SPBC31F10.06c	SPAC6F12.04	sar1	-	psr1	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437765	2539858	2540578	276405	277104	SPBC16E9.06c	SPBC26H8.06	uvi31	grx4	-	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437766	2539832	2540232	276381	276764	SPBC1271.04c	SPBC336.10c	SPBC1271.04c	tif512	-	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437767	2538851	2538885	275432	275463	SPCC18.07	SPCC330.13	rpc53	rpc37	-	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437768	2540402	2540402	276930	276930	SPBC30D10.05c	SPBC30D10.05c	SPBC30D10.05c	SPBC30D10.05c	-	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437769	2540625	2540625	277151	277151	SPBC21C3.10c	SPBC21C3.10c	SPBC21C3.10c	SPBC21C3.10c	-	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437770	2541337	2541337	277848	277848	SPBP35G2.13c	SPBP35G2.13c	swc2	swc2	-	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437771	2540817	2538752	277335	275335	SPAC3H5.05c	SPCC830.11c	rps1401	fap7	rps14|rps14-1	SPCC830.11c	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437772	2542433	2538932	278895	275508	SPAC17G6.14c	SPCC31H12.03c	uap56	tho1	-	SPCC31H12.03c	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437773	2542875	2540288	279320	276819	SPAC13G7.02c	SPBC3B9.01	ssa1	fes1	-	SPBC3B9.01	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437774	2542379	2542379	278843	278843	SPAC1687.17c	SPAC1687.17c	SPAC1687.17c	SPAC1687.17c	-	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437775	2540119	2540119	276656	276656	SPBC1773.05c	SPBC1773.05c	tms1	tms1	-	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437776	2541617	2541617	278114	278114	SPAC27D7.04	SPAC27D7.04	omt2	omt2	-	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437777	2542772	2542772	279221	279221	SPAC16.02c	SPAC16.02c	srp2	srp2	-	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437778	2538731	2538731	275315	275315	SPCC1393.10	SPCC1393.10	ctr4	ctr4	-	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437779	2541050	2541050	277565	277565	SPBC428.05c	SPBC428.05c	arg12	arg12	-	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437780	2541490	2541490	277992	277992	SPAP27G11.09c	SPAP27G11.09c	SPAP27G11.09c	SPAP27G11.09c	-	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437781	2542470	2542470	278931	278931	SPAC19G12.04	SPAC19G12.04	dal1	dal1	SPAC19G12.04	SPAC19G12.04	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437782	2542922	2540725	279363	277248	SPAC1142.07c	SPBC215.14c	vps32	vps20	snf7	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437783	2543387	2543387	279809	279809	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAPB1E7.02c	mcl1	mcl1	slr3	slr3	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437784	2539869	2540027	276415	276571	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC1734.14c	cdc2	suc1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	p13	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437785	2541941	2539349	278428	275915	SPAC20H4.03c	SPCC613.11c	tfs1	meu23	-	B13958-2	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437786	2541941	2543580	278428	279995	SPAC20H4.03c	SPAC644.14c	tfs1	rad51	-	rhp51	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437787	2541585	2542227	278082	278700	SPAC14C4.05c	SPAC5H10.13c	man1	gmh2	heh2|mug61	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437788	2542443	2539002	278905	275576	SPAC17G6.13	SPCC830.07c	slt1	psi1	-	psi	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437789	2542546	2539107	279003	275679	SPAC1399.05c	SPCC965.12	toe1	SPCC965.12	SPAC1399.05c	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437790	2541852	2539928	278343	276472	SPAC23H3.09c	SPBC1604.08c	gly1	imp1	-	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437791	2541585	2540846	278082	277363	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC428.14	man1	SPBC428.14	heh2|mug61	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437792	2542567	2541133	279023	277648	SPAC328.05	SPBC660.05	SPAC328.05	SPBC660.05	-	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437793	2543517	2541054	279935	277569	SPAC3G9.05	SPBC3B8.08	spa2	SPBC3B8.08	SPAC3G9.05	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437794	2539740	2538736	276292	275320	SPBC1685.04	SPCC1322.12c	SPBC1685.04	bub1	-	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437795	2543382	2543382	279804	279804	SPAC890.02c	SPAC890.02c	alp7	alp7	mia1	mia1	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437796	2541923	2541709	278411	278204	SPAC23C4.09c	SPAC3C7.02c	SPAC23C4.09c	pil2	-	SPAC3C7.02c	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437797	2541941	2540712	278428	277235	SPAC20H4.03c	SPBC216.02	tfs1	mcp5	-	mug21|num1	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437798	2542725	2540409	279176	276937	SPAC3A12.10	SPBC2D10.11c	rpl2001	nap2	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	nap1.2|nap12	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437799	2542928	2540862	279369	277379	SPAC1142.06	SPBC4C3.06	get3	syp1	-	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437800	2543580	2539838	279995	276387	SPAC644.14c	SPBC1347.10	rad51	cdc23	rhp51	mcm10	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437801	2543517	2543055	279935	279489	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC806.06c	spa2	SPAC806.06c	SPAC3G9.05	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437802	2540563	2539495	277090	276058	SPBC25H2.09	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC25H2.09	ptc1	-	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437803	2541197	2539538	277711	276100	SPBC839.12	SPCC364.06	rpc31	nap1	-	nap11	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437804	2541822	2541822	278313	278313	SPAC1F7.10	SPAC1F7.10	SPAC1F7.10	SPAC1F7.10	-	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437805	2542772	2539818	279221	276368	SPAC16.02c	SPBC11C11.08	srp2	srp1	-	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437806	2541441	2541441	277946	277946	SPAC1F7.09c	SPAC1F7.09c	SPAC1F7.09c	SPAC1F7.09c	-	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437807	2541706	2539216	278201	275786	SPAC16E8.15	SPCC14G10.04	tif45	SPCC14G10.04	tif1	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437808	2541436	2542958	277941	279398	SPAC11H11.03c	SPAC12G12.09	SPAC11H11.03c	SPAC12G12.09	-	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437809	2543607	2541938	280022	278425	SPAC4F8.07c	SPAC8C9.16c	hxk2	mug63	-	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437810	2541958	2541054	278445	277569	SPAC2F3.05c	SPBC3B8.08	SPAC2F3.05c	SPBC3B8.08	-	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437811	2541466	2539733	277968	276285	SPAC14C4.06c	SPBC16E9.12c	nab2	pab2	SPAC14C4.06c	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437812	2539562	2539593	276123	276151	SPCC569.01c	SPCP20C8.01c	SPCC569.01c	SPCP20C8.01c	-	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437813	2541482	2541482	277984	277984	SPAC23D3.03c	SPAC23D3.03c	SPAC23D3.03c	SPAC23D3.03c	-	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437814	2540931	2541197	277447	277711	SPBC365.07c	SPBC839.12	SPBC365.07c	rpc31	-	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437815	2542047	2540329	278528	276859	SPAC21E11.03c	SPBC29B5.01	pcr1	atf1	mts2	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437816	2542066	2539750	278543	276302	SPAC227.05	SPBC14F5.10c	SPAC227.05	SPBC14F5.10c	-	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437817	2543143	2539980	279575	276524	SPAPB1A10.04c	SPBC1773.14	cwp1	arg7	-	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437818	2543237	2542029	279665	278511	SPAC6B12.02c	SPAC8E11.02c	mus7	rad24	mms22	anr5|sam4	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437819	2542245	2541131	278715	277646	SPAC17A5.10	SPBC713.02c	SPAC17A5.10	ubp15	-	ubp21|ubpD	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437820	2538967	2538967	275541	275541	SPCC330.04c	SPCC330.04c	mug135	mug135	-	-	PCA	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437821	2539423	2540329	275988	276859	SPCC663.12	SPBC29B5.01	cid12	atf1	-	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437822	2540213	1810	276746	108144	SPBC17D1.06	-	dbp3	DR1	SPCC17D1.06	NC2|NC2-BETA	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1437823	10589	2540406	115838	276934	-	SPBC30D10.02	DRAP1	SPBC30D10.02	NC2-alpha	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Vo TV (2016)	26771498	9606	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1503878	2540324	2542121	276854	278597	SPBC29A3.16	SPAC17H9.05	rrs1	ebp2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Wan K (2015)	26122634	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1503879	2540324	2543500	276854	279918	SPBC29A3.16	SPAC926.08c	rrs1	SPAC926.08c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Wan K (2015)	26122634	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1503880	2540324	853682	276854	33966	SPBC29A3.16	YKL172W	rrs1	EBP2	-	L000004646	Two-hybrid	physical	Wan K (2015)	26122634	284812	559292	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1503881	2540324	853956	276854	34212	SPBC29A3.16	YKR081C	rrs1	RPF2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Wan K (2015)	26122634	284812	559292	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1503882	2540268	2542121	276799	278597	SPBC800.06	SPAC17H9.05	brx1	ebp2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Wan K (2015)	26122634	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1504087	2541249	2542123	277763	278599	SPBC947.01	SPAC18G6.15	alf1	mal3	SPBC947.01	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Scheffler K (2014)	25422470	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	Interactor A: null|Interactor B: null	-	BIOGRID
1504088	2542123	2539047	278599	275620	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC1223.06	mal3	tea1	-	alp8	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Scheffler K (2014)	25422470	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:wild type	Interactor A: null|Interactor B: null|Tea1 absence suppresses the aggravating effect of mal3 or mto1 null	-	BIOGRID
1504089	2539467	2539047	276030	275620	SPCC417.07c	SPCC1223.06	mto1	tea1	mbo1|mod20	alp8	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Scheffler K (2014)	25422470	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:wild type	Interactor A: null|Interactor B: null|Tea1 absence suppresses the aggravating effect of mal3 or mto1 null	-	BIOGRID
1504090	2541249	2539467	277763	276030	SPBC947.01	SPCC417.07c	alf1	mto1	SPBC947.01	mbo1|mod20	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Scheffler K (2014)	25422470	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	Interactor A: null|Interactor B: null	-	BIOGRID
1504091	2540880	2539869	277397	276415	SPBC582.03	SPBC11B10.09	cdc13	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Caspari T (2015)	26131711	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1504092	2539087	2539869	275659	276415	SPCC1259.13	SPBC11B10.09	chk1	cdc2	rad27	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Caspari T (2015)	26131711	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1504093	3361306	2542757	280382	279207	SPBC6B1.09c	SPAC13C5.07	nbs1	mre11	slr10	rad32	Two-hybrid	physical	Williams GJ (2011)	21441914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1504094	2541635	2542757	278131	279207	SPAC1556.01c	SPAC13C5.07	rad50	mre11	SPAP4C9.01c	rad32	Two-hybrid	physical	Williams GJ (2011)	21441914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1504095	2542757	2542757	279207	279207	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC13C5.07	mre11	mre11	rad32	rad32	Two-hybrid	physical	Williams GJ (2011)	21441914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1504096	2542757	2541635	279207	278131	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC1556.01c	mre11	rad50	rad32	SPAP4C9.01c	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Williams GJ (2011)	21441914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1504097	2542757	2541045	279207	277560	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC543.03c	mre11	pku80	rad32	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Williams GJ (2011)	21441914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Interactor A: unspecified, allele name: mre11-RRR|Interactor B: null|the pku80 null mutation suppresses the slow growth phenotype as well as the IR, CPT, UV and HU sensitivities of mre11-RRRR cells	-	BIOGRID
1504098	2542757	2540348	279207	276877	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC29A10.05	mre11	exo1	rad32	mut2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Williams GJ (2011)	21441914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Interactor A: unspecified, allele name: mre11-RRR|Interactor B: null|the exo1 null mutation exacerbates the slow growth phenotype as well as the IR, CPT, UV and HU sensitivities of mre11-RRRR cells	-	BIOGRID
1504099	2541045	2540348	277560	276877	SPBC543.03c	SPBC29A10.05	pku80	exo1	-	mut2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Williams GJ (2011)	21441914	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:wild type|resistance to chemicals:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	Interactor A: null|Interactor B: null|the exo1 null mutation suppresses the rescue of the the mre11 mutant phenotypes by pku80	-	BIOGRID
1504102	2542196	2540802	278671	277321	SPAC30D11.13	SPBC1921.02	hus5	rad60	ubc9	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Prudden J (2011)	21444718	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1504103	2542196	2540802	278671	277321	SPAC30D11.13	SPBC1921.02	hus5	rad60	ubc9	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Prudden J (2011)	21444718	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1504104	2542196	2540927	278671	277443	SPAC30D11.13	SPBC365.06	hus5	pmt3	ubc9	smt3|ubl2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Prudden J (2011)	21444718	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1504105	2540802	2540927	277321	277443	SPBC1921.02	SPBC365.06	rad60	pmt3	-	smt3|ubl2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Prudden J (2011)	21444718	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	Interactor A: unspecified rad60E380R|Interactor B: unspecified SUMOD81R|rad60E380R SUMOD81R double mutant is extremely synthetically sick	-	BIOGRID
1504106	2542312	2540927	278778	277443	SPAC16A10.06c	SPBC365.06	nse2	pmt3	pli2	smt3|ubl2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Prudden J (2011)	21444718	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	Interactor A: unspecified nse2-SA|Interactor B: unspecified SUMOD81R|nse2-SA SUMOD81R double mutant is synthetically sick	-	BIOGRID
1504108	2540618	2540927	277144	277443	SPBC3D6.11c	SPBC365.06	slx8	pmt3	-	smt3|ubl2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Prudden J (2011)	21444718	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth:wild type	Interactor A: unspecified slx8-29|Interactor B: unspecified SUMOD81R|Interactor B: unspecified SUMOD81R, SUMOK14/30R	-	BIOGRID
1504109	2540618	2541580	277144	278077	SPBC3D6.11c	SPAC1687.05	slx8	pli1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Prudden J (2011)	21444718	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth:wild type	Interactor A: unspecified slx8-29|Interactor B: null	-	BIOGRID
1504110	2542268	2540927	278737	277443	SPAC17A5.07c	SPBC365.06	ulp2	pmt3	-	smt3|ubl2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Prudden J (2011)	21444718	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	temperature sensitive growth:wild type	Interactor A: unspecified slx8-29|Interactor B: unspecified SUMOK14/30R	-	BIOGRID
1504111	2541580	2543580	278077	279995	SPAC1687.05	SPAC644.14c	pli1	rad51	-	rhp51	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Prudden J (2011)	21444718	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	Interactor A: null|Interactor B: null	-	BIOGRID
1504112	2541580	2539004	278077	275578	SPAC1687.05	SPCC4G3.05c	pli1	mus81	-	slx3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Prudden J (2011)	21444718	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	Interactor A: null|Interactor B: null	-	BIOGRID
1504113	2541580	2540032	278077	276575	SPAC1687.05	SPBC1703.14c	pli1	top1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Prudden J (2011)	21444718	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	Interactor A: null|Interactor B: null|deletion of Top1 rescued the synthetic lethal relationship between pli1 and rhp51 or mus81 null mutants|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1504114	2543580	2540032	279995	276575	SPAC644.14c	SPBC1703.14c	rad51	top1	rhp51	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Prudden J (2011)	21444718	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	Interactor A: null|Interactor B: null|deletion of Top1 rescued the synthetic lethal relationship between pli1 and rhp51 or mus81 null mutants|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1504115	2539004	2540032	275578	276575	SPCC4G3.05c	SPBC1703.14c	mus81	top1	slx3	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Prudden J (2011)	21444718	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	Interactor A: null|Interactor B: null|deletion of Top1 rescued the synthetic lethal relationship between pli1 and rhp51 or mus81 null mutants|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1504116	2543580	2540927	279995	277443	SPAC644.14c	SPBC365.06	rad51	pmt3	rhp51	smt3|ubl2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Prudden J (2011)	21444718	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	Interactor A: null|Interactor B: SUMOD81R	-	BIOGRID
1504117	2540927	2540032	277443	276575	SPBC365.06	SPBC1703.14c	pmt3	top1	smt3|ubl2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Prudden J (2011)	21444718	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	Interactor A: SUMOD81R|Interactor B: null|synthetic lethality of SUMOD81R rhp51-null cells is suppressed by deletion of Top1	-	BIOGRID
1504121	2539155	2541193	275727	277707	SPCC1020.02	SPBC776.02c	spc7	dis2	-	bws1|sds1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Meadows JC (2011)	21664573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1504122	2539155	2541193	275727	277707	SPCC1020.02	SPBC776.02c	spc7	dis2	-	bws1|sds1	Two-hybrid	physical	Meadows JC (2011)	21664573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1504123	2539155	2540589	275727	277115	SPCC1020.02	SPBC20F10.06	spc7	mad2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Meadows JC (2011)	21664573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	Interactor A: unspecified, spc7(PP1-deltaB)|Interactor B: null	-	BIOGRID
1504124	2539155	2539219	275727	275789	SPCC1020.02	SPCC1795.01c	spc7	mad3	-	SPCC895.02	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Meadows JC (2011)	21664573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	Interactor A: unspecified, spc7(PP1-deltaB)|Interactor B: null	-	BIOGRID
1504125	2542615	2540589	279069	277115	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBC20F10.06	cut20	mad2	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Meadows JC (2011)	21664573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1504126	2542615	2539219	279069	275789	SPAC19G12.01c	SPCC1795.01c	cut20	mad3	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	SPCC895.02	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Meadows JC (2011)	21664573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1504127	2541856	2540361	278347	276890	SPAC23H3.08c	SPBC2F12.13	bub3	klp5	-	sot1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Meadows JC (2011)	21664573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	Interactor A: null|Interactor B:null	-	BIOGRID
1504128	2541856	2539219	278347	275789	SPAC23H3.08c	SPCC1795.01c	bub3	mad3	-	SPCC895.02	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Meadows JC (2011)	21664573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	Interactor A: null|Interactor B:null|deletion of mad3 partially rescues growth in a bub3/klp5 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1504129	2540361	2539219	276890	275789	SPBC2F12.13	SPCC1795.01c	klp5	mad3	sot1	SPCC895.02	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Meadows JC (2011)	21664573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	Interactor A: null|Interactor B:null|deletion of mad3 partially rescues growth in a bub3/klp5 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1504130	2539700	2541193	276253	277707	SPBC1685.15c	SPBC776.02c	klp6	dis2	SPBC649.01c|sot2	bws1|sds1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Meadows JC (2011)	21664573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1504131	2540361	2539155	276890	275727	SPBC2F12.13	SPCC1020.02	klp5	spc7	sot1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Meadows JC (2011)	21664573	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression	Interactor A: klp5|Interactor B: unspecified spc7(PP1-deltaAB)|double mutants show enhanced defects in spindle checkpoint regulation	-	BIOGRID
1504157	2541033	2542503	277548	278961	SPBC3B9.21	SPAC19A8.12	dcp1	dcp2	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Fromm SA (2012)	22085934	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1504158	2541033	2540639	277548	277164	SPBC3B9.21	SPBC18E5.11c	dcp1	edc3	-	SPBC23G7.01c	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Fromm SA (2012)	22085934	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1504159	2540639	2542503	277164	278961	SPBC18E5.11c	SPAC19A8.12	edc3	dcp2	SPBC23G7.01c	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Fromm SA (2012)	22085934	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	NMR	-	BIOGRID
1504161	2540639	2542503	277164	278961	SPBC18E5.11c	SPAC19A8.12	edc3	dcp2	SPBC23G7.01c	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Fromm SA (2012)	22085934	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1504162	2540829	2542503	277347	278961	SPBC800.09	SPAC19A8.12	sum2	dcp2	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Fromm SA (2012)	22085934	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	NMR	-	BIOGRID
1504163	2542503	2541033	278961	277548	SPAC19A8.12	SPBC3B9.21	dcp2	dcp1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Fromm SA (2012)	22085934	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1504224	2539527	2540627	276089	277153	SPCC338.16	SPBC25H2.13c	pof3	cdc20	-	pol2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Roseaulin LC (2013)	23349636	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1504230	2539527	2540728	276089	277251	SPCC338.16	SPBC216.06c	pof3	swi1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Roseaulin LC (2013)	23349636	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance|resistance to chemicals	Interactor A: null|Interactor B: null|double mutants show increased sensitivity to HU and CPT and no DNA replication recovery	-	BIOGRID
1504231	2540728	2539527	277251	276089	SPBC216.06c	SPCC338.16	swi1	pof3	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Roseaulin LC (2013)	23349636	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	Interactor A: null|Interactor B: null|the elongation phenotype of swi1 cells is abolished when pof3 is deleted	-	BIOGRID
1505635	2541657	2543478	278153	279898	SPAP27G11.15	SPAC688.06c	slx1	slx4	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Lian FM (2016)	26787556	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1512381	2542606	7316	279060	113164	SPAC19B12.10	-	sst2	UBC	-	HMG20	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Bueno AN (2015)	26368668	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	-	-	#LPPI|Likely protein-protein interaction	-	BIOGRID
1512382	2542606	7316	279060	113164	SPAC19B12.10	-	sst2	UBC	-	HMG20	Biochemical Activity	physical	Bueno AN (2015)	26368668	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	Deubiquitination	-	#LPPI|Likely protein-protein interaction|Sst2 cleaves diubiquitin to monoubiquitin in vitro	-	BIOGRID
1512383	2542606	7316	279060	113164	SPAC19B12.10	-	sst2	UBC	-	HMG20	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Bueno AN (2015)	26368668	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	-	-	#LPPI|Likely protein-protein interaction	-	BIOGRID
1514713	2541353	2540648	277864	277173	SPBP35G2.11c	SPBC1921.05	SPBP35G2.11c	ape2	-	ape1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu XM (2015)	26365378	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1514714	2541353	2538917	277864	275494	SPBP35G2.11c	SPCC1322.05c	SPBP35G2.11c	SPCC1322.05c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Liu XM (2015)	26365378	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1514715	2541353	2540648	277864	277173	SPBP35G2.11c	SPBC1921.05	SPBP35G2.11c	ape2	-	ape1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Liu XM (2015)	26365378	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1514716	2541353	2538917	277864	275494	SPBP35G2.11c	SPCC1322.05c	SPBP35G2.11c	SPCC1322.05c	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Liu XM (2015)	26365378	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1514717	2541353	2540648	277864	277173	SPBP35G2.11c	SPBC1921.05	SPBP35G2.11c	ape2	-	ape1	Co-fractionation	physical	Liu XM (2015)	26365378	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1514718	2541353	2538917	277864	275494	SPBP35G2.11c	SPCC1322.05c	SPBP35G2.11c	SPCC1322.05c	-	-	Co-fractionation	physical	Liu XM (2015)	26365378	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1514719	2540648	2541353	277173	277864	SPBC1921.05	SPBP35G2.11c	ape2	SPBP35G2.11c	ape1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Liu XM (2015)	26365378	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1514720	2540648	2538917	277173	275494	SPBC1921.05	SPCC1322.05c	ape2	SPCC1322.05c	ape1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Liu XM (2015)	26365378	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1514721	2541818	2542432	278309	278894	SPAC11G7.02	SPAC1805.15c	pub1	pub2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Liu XM (2015)	26365378	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	autophagy	genetic complex|triple mutants show a defect in the NVT pathway	-	BIOGRID
1514722	2541818	2542925	278309	279366	SPAC11G7.02	SPAC11E3.04c	pub1	ubc13	-	spu13|sst5	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Liu XM (2015)	26365378	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	autophagy	genetic complex|triple mutants show a defect in the NVT pathway	-	BIOGRID
1514723	2542432	2542925	278894	279366	SPAC1805.15c	SPAC11E3.04c	pub2	ubc13	-	spu13|sst5	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Liu XM (2015)	26365378	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	autophagy	genetic complex|triple mutants show a defect in the NVT pathway	-	BIOGRID
1517992	2543576	2541940	279991	278427	SPAC4A8.05c	SPAC27F1.02c	myp2	cdc8	myo3	fus4	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Takaine M (2015)	26092938	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
1518206	2541153	2539206	277668	275776	SPBC725.16	SPCC24B10.07	res1	gad8	sct1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Cohen A (2016)	26912660	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1518207	2541871	2539206	278361	275776	SPAC22F3.09c	SPCC24B10.07	res2	gad8	mcs1|pct1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Cohen A (2016)	26912660	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1518208	2539869	2539206	276415	275776	SPBC11B10.09	SPCC24B10.07	cdc2	gad8	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Cohen A (2016)	26912660	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1518209	983	2539197	107420	275768	-	SPCC24B10.14c	CDK1	xlf1	CDC2|CDC28A|P34CDC2	mug104|nej1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Hentges P (2014)	25533340	9606	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1518859	2541213	2543086	277727	279519	SPBC887.14c	SPAC30D11.10	pfh1	rad52	pif1	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Steinacher R (2012)	22426535	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
1518860	2541213	2543580	277727	279995	SPBC887.14c	SPAC644.14c	pfh1	rad51	pif1	rhp51	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Steinacher R (2012)	22426535	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	recombinant formation in pfh1 mutant cells is partially dependent on rad51	-	BIOGRID
1518861	2541213	2539004	277727	275578	SPBC887.14c	SPCC4G3.05c	pfh1	mus81	pif1	slx3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Steinacher R (2012)	22426535	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
1518862	2541973	3361400	278458	280476	SPAC6G9.13c	SPAC1093.06c	bqt1	dhc1	mug23|rec26	SPAC30C2.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Fennell A (2015)	25688135	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	position of spindle pole body:partial rescue	dhc1 and hrs1 mutants restore bipolar spindle formation in bqt1 mutants	-	BIOGRID
1518863	2541973	2541097	278458	277612	SPAC6G9.13c	SPBC582.06c	bqt1	mcp6	mug23|rec26	hrs1|mug3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Fennell A (2015)	25688135	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	position of spindle pole body:partial rescue	dhc1 and hrs1 mutants restore bipolar spindle formation in bqt1 mutants	-	BIOGRID
1518865	2539205	2539205	275775	275775	SPCC4B3.15	SPCC4B3.15	mid1	mid1	dmf1	dmf1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Sun L (2015)	25959226	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	homodimerization	-	BIOGRID
1518866	2539205	2543168	275775	279599	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC31A2.16	mid1	gef2	dmf1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sun L (2015)	25959226	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
1518911	2540578	2539644	277104	276199	SPBC26H8.06	SPBC16E9.01c	grx4	php4	-	SPBP16F5.09c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Encinar del Dedo J (2015)	25806539	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1518912	2540578	2541522	277104	278023	SPBC26H8.06	SPAC23E2.01	grx4	fep1	-	gaf2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Encinar del Dedo J (2015)	25806539	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1518914	2541881	2540578	278371	277104	SPAC22F3.10c	SPBC26H8.06	gcs1	grx4	apd1|gsh1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Encinar del Dedo J (2015)	25806539	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type	loss of grx4 inhibits the constitutive de-repression of Fep-1 dependent genes seen in a gcs1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1518915	2540578	2542160	277104	278636	SPBC26H8.06	SPAC8C9.11	grx4	fra2	-	SPAC8C9.11	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Encinar del Dedo J (2015)	25806539	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1518921	2539433	2540654	275996	277179	SPCC4E9.02	SPBC19F5.01c	cig1	puc1	SPCC645.01	SPBP8B7.32c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Gutierrez-Escribano P (2015)	25891897	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression	genetic complex|he cig2/cig1/puc1 triple mutant showed a delay in progression into premeiotic S-phase when compared with wild type. This delay was greater than that exhibited by the cig2 and cig2/cig1 mutant strains	-	BIOGRID
1518922	2543481	2540654	279901	277179	SPAPB2B4.03	SPBC19F5.01c	cig2	puc1	cyc17	SPBP8B7.32c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Gutierrez-Escribano P (2015)	25891897	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression	genetic complex|he cig2/cig1/puc1 triple mutant showed a delay in progression into premeiotic S-phase when compared with wild type. This delay was greater than that exhibited by the cig2 and cig2/cig1 mutant strains	-	BIOGRID
1518926	2540118	2540450	276655	276978	SPBC16E9.17c	SPBC2G2.09c	rem1	crs1	-	mug17	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Gutierrez-Escribano P (2015)	25891897	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation	double mutants show reduced spore viability	-	BIOGRID
1518927	2539433	2540450	275996	276978	SPCC4E9.02	SPBC2G2.09c	cig1	crs1	SPCC645.01	mug17	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Gutierrez-Escribano P (2015)	25891897	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis	genetic complex|the quadruple mutant shows increased defects in meiotic cell cycle progression compared to the triple mutant	-	BIOGRID
1518928	2543481	2540450	279901	276978	SPAPB2B4.03	SPBC2G2.09c	cig2	crs1	cyc17	mug17	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Gutierrez-Escribano P (2015)	25891897	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis	genetic complex|the quadruple mutant shows increased defects in meiotic cell cycle progression compared to the triple mutant	-	BIOGRID
1518929	2540654	2540450	277179	276978	SPBC19F5.01c	SPBC2G2.09c	puc1	crs1	SPBP8B7.32c	mug17	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Gutierrez-Escribano P (2015)	25891897	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis	genetic complex|the quadruple mutant shows increased defects in meiotic cell cycle progression compared to the triple mutant	-	BIOGRID
1518948	2541975	2541975	278460	278460	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC20G8.05c	cdc15	cdc15	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	McDonald NA (2015)	26702831	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Cdc15 oligomerizes	-	BIOGRID
1518992	2539407	3361476	275972	280552	SPCC970.09	SPAC16A10.04	sec8	rho4	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Perez P (2015)	25724972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
1518993	2539487	3361476	276050	280552	SPCC895.05	SPAC16A10.04	for3	rho4	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Perez P (2015)	25724972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
1518994	3361476	2540127	280552	276664	SPAC16A10.04	SPBC106.20	rho4	exo70	-	SPBC582.02	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Perez P (2015)	25724972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1518995	3361476	2539407	280552	275972	SPAC16A10.04	SPCC970.09	rho4	sec8	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Perez P (2015)	25724972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1518996	3361476	2543516	280552	279934	SPAC16A10.04	SPAC4F10.11	rho4	spn1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Perez P (2015)	25724972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology	double mutants show increased septation defects	-	BIOGRID
1518997	3361476	2543513	280552	279931	SPAC16A10.04	SPAC821.06	rho4	spn2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Perez P (2015)	25724972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology	double mutants show increased septation defects	-	BIOGRID
1518998	3361476	2540029	280552	276573	SPAC16A10.04	SPBC16A3.01	rho4	spn3	-	SPBC543.01c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Perez P (2015)	25724972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology	double mutants show increased septation defects	-	BIOGRID
1518999	3361476	2542193	280552	278668	SPAC16A10.04	SPAC9G1.11c	rho4	spn4	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Perez P (2015)	25724972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology	double mutants show increased septation defects	-	BIOGRID
1519000	3361476	2540029	280552	276573	SPAC16A10.04	SPBC16A3.01	rho4	spn3	-	SPBC543.01c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Perez P (2015)	25724972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519001	2542596	2540558	279050	277085	SPAC1B3.17	SPBC2D10.17	clr2	clr1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Job G (2016)	27105116	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519002	2540558	2540821	277085	277339	SPBC2D10.17	SPBC800.03	clr1	clr3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Job G (2016)	27105116	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519003	2542596	2540821	279050	277339	SPAC1B3.17	SPBC800.03	clr2	clr3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Job G (2016)	27105116	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519004	2541336	2540558	277847	277085	SPBP35G2.10	SPBC2D10.17	mit1	clr1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Job G (2016)	27105116	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519005	2540558	2541336	277085	277847	SPBC2D10.17	SPBP35G2.10	clr1	mit1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Job G (2016)	27105116	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519006	2540558	2541336	277085	277847	SPBC2D10.17	SPBP35G2.10	clr1	mit1	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Job G (2016)	27105116	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519007	2540558	2542596	277085	279050	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC1B3.17	clr1	clr2	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Job G (2016)	27105116	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519008	2540558	2542596	277085	279050	SPBC2D10.17	SPAC1B3.17	clr1	clr2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Job G (2016)	27105116	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519010	2540821	2540821	277339	277339	SPBC800.03	SPBC800.03	clr3	clr3	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Job G (2016)	27105116	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	dimer	-	BIOGRID
1519011	2540348	2541620	276877	278117	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC2G11.12	exo1	rqh1	mut2	hus2|rad12|rec9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nanbu T (2015)	26465752	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	deletion of both exo1 and rqh1 alleviates telomere loss in a pot1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1519012	2542703	2541620	279156	278117	SPAC26H5.06	SPAC2G11.12	pot1	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nanbu T (2015)	26465752	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length|viability	The nmt-pot1-aid strain lost viability in the presence of both thiamine and auxin, single deletion of rqh1 suppressed the loss of viability slightly, concomitant deletion of rqh1 and exo1 suppressed the loss of viability significantly|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1519013	2542703	2540348	279156	276877	SPAC26H5.06	SPBC29A10.05	pot1	exo1	-	mut2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nanbu T (2015)	26465752	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length|viability	The nmt-pot1-aid strain lost viability in the presence of both thiamine and auxin, single deletion of rqh1 suppressed the loss of viability slightly, concomitant deletion of rqh1 and exo1 suppressed the loss of viability significantly|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1519014	2540348	2540148	276877	276685	SPBC29A10.05	SPBC16D10.04c	exo1	dna2	mut2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nanbu T (2015)	26465752	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	deletion of both exo1 and dna2 alleviates telomere loss in a pot1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1519015	2539214	2542463	275784	278924	SPCC1672.10	SPAC1834.03c	mis16	hhf1	-	h4.1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	An S (2015)	26343758	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	mis16 pulls down sumoylated histone 4	-	BIOGRID
1519016	2539214	2543449	275784	279869	SPCC1672.10	SPAPB1A10.02	mis16	scm3	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	An S (2015)	26343758	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519017	2543589	2540051	280004	276589	SPAC4F10.15c	SPBC32H8.12c	wsp1	act1	-	cps8|pi012	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Wagner AR (2013)	24120641	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519018	2543589	2543233	280004	279661	SPAC4F10.15c	SPAC630.03	wsp1	arp3	-	act2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Wagner AR (2013)	24120641	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519019	2540504	2543233	277032	279661	SPBC24C6.10c	SPAC630.03	dip1	arp3	-	act2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Wagner AR (2013)	24120641	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519024	2540730	2541065	277253	277580	SPBC19C2.09	SPBC3B9.15c	sre1	scp1	-	scap	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Gong X (2015)	25771684	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519026	2539737	2539087	276289	275659	SPBC16A3.07c	SPCC1259.13	nrm1	chk1	-	rad27	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Caetano C (2014)	25533348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:wild type	reduces cell length upon division to close to wildtype levels	-	BIOGRID
1519028	2539737	2540885	276289	277402	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC660.14	nrm1	mik1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Caetano C (2014)	25533348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:undetermined	reduces cell length upon division	-	BIOGRID
1519029	2539737	2539004	276289	275578	SPBC16A3.07c	SPCC4G3.05c	nrm1	mus81	-	slx3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Caetano C (2014)	25533348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
1519030	2539737	2542757	276289	279207	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC13C5.07	nrm1	mre11	-	rad32	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Caetano C (2014)	25533348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
1519031	2539737	2543086	276289	279519	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC30D11.10	nrm1	rad52	-	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Caetano C (2014)	25533348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
1519033	2539737	2538706	276289	275290	SPBC16A3.07c	SPCC338.08	nrm1	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Caetano C (2014)	25533348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
1519034	2539737	2543481	276289	279901	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAPB2B4.03	nrm1	cig2	-	cyc17	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Caetano C (2014)	25533348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance|protein/peptide accumulation|viability	high levels of cig2 are critical to prevent genome instability and hyperaccumulation of cdc18	-	BIOGRID
1519035	2539737	2541871	276289	278361	SPBC16A3.07c	SPAC22F3.09c	nrm1	res2	-	mcs1|pct1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Caetano C (2014)	25533348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	deletion of res2 lowers cdc18 levels in a cig2/nrm1 mutant and improves viabiltiy|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1519036	2543481	2541871	279901	278361	SPAPB2B4.03	SPAC22F3.09c	cig2	res2	cyc17	mcs1|pct1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Caetano C (2014)	25533348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	deletion of res2 lowers cdc18 levels in a cig2/nrm1 mutant and improves viabiltiy|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1519037	2539737	2540013	276289	276557	SPBC16A3.07c	SPBC14C8.07c	nrm1	cdc18	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Caetano C (2014)	25533348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	cdc18-T6A is lethal with nrm1-delta	-	BIOGRID
1519041	2543671	2541916	280085	278406	SPAC644.04	SPAC23C4.19	pct1	spt5	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Doamekpor SK (2015)	25414009	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519042	2543671	2541916	280085	278406	SPAC644.04	SPAC23C4.19	pct1	spt5	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Doamekpor SK (2015)	25414009	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519043	2543671	2540627	280085	277153	SPAC644.04	SPBC25H2.13c	pct1	cdc20	-	pol2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Doamekpor SK (2015)	25414009	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519044	2543671	2543671	280085	280085	SPAC644.04	SPAC644.04	pct1	pct1	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Doamekpor SK (2015)	25414009	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	homodimer	-	BIOGRID
1519045	2540742	2539437	277265	276000	SPBC19G7.08c	SPCC645.06c	art1	rgf3	-	lad1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Davidson R (2015)	25473118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
1519046	2540742	2539437	277265	276000	SPBC19G7.08c	SPCC645.06c	art1	rgf3	-	lad1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Davidson R (2015)	25473118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell death:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
1519047	2540742	2541612	277265	278109	SPBC19G7.08c	SPAC1F7.04	art1	rho1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Davidson R (2015)	25473118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell death:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
1519048	2540742	2539437	277265	276000	SPBC19G7.08c	SPCC645.06c	art1	rgf3	-	lad1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Davidson R (2015)	25473118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519049	2540742	2539437	277265	276000	SPBC19G7.08c	SPCC645.06c	art1	rgf3	-	lad1	Two-hybrid	physical	Davidson R (2015)	25473118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519182	14218174	2540241	4254536	276773	SPAC19G12.17	SPBC32H8.11	erh1	mei4	new10|iss6	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sugiyama T (2016)	26942678	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
1519183	14218174	2539540	4254536	276102	SPAC19G12.17	SPCC736.12c	erh1	mmi1	new10|iss6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sugiyama T (2016)	26942678	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519184	14218174	2543254	4254536	279682	SPAC19G12.17	SPAC1006.03c	erh1	red1	new10|iss6	iss3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sugiyama T (2016)	26942678	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519185	14218174	2542173	4254536	278648	SPAC19G12.17	SPAC17H9.02	erh1	mtl1	new10|iss6	SPAC17H9.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sugiyama T (2016)	26942678	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519186	14218174	2541655	4254536	278151	SPAC19G12.17	SPAC7D4.14c	erh1	iss10	new10|iss6	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sugiyama T (2016)	26942678	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519187	14218174	2542001	4254536	278485	SPAC19G12.17	SPAC20G8.06	erh1	not1	new10|iss6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sugiyama T (2016)	26942678	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519188	14218174	2538778	4254536	275359	SPAC19G12.17	SPCC4G3.15c	erh1	not2	new10|iss6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sugiyama T (2016)	26942678	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519189	14218174	2542126	4254536	278602	SPAC19G12.17	SPAC1B3.05	erh1	not3	new10|iss6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sugiyama T (2016)	26942678	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519190	14218174	2539041	4254536	275614	SPAC19G12.17	SPCC18.06c	erh1	caf1	new10|iss6	pop2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sugiyama T (2016)	26942678	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519191	14218174	2542325	4254536	278791	SPAC19G12.17	SPAC16C9.04c	erh1	mot2	new10|iss6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sugiyama T (2016)	26942678	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519192	14218174	2538913	4254536	275490	SPAC19G12.17	SPCC31H12.08c	erh1	ccr4	new10|iss6	SPCC5E4.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sugiyama T (2016)	26942678	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519193	14218174	2542094	4254536	278571	SPAC19G12.17	SPAC29B12.06c	erh1	rcd1	new10|iss6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sugiyama T (2016)	26942678	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519194	14218174	2539425	4254536	275990	SPAC19G12.17	SPCC550.14	erh1	vgl1	new10|iss6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sugiyama T (2016)	26942678	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519195	14218174	2541505	4254536	278007	SPAC19G12.17	SPAC57A7.04c	erh1	pabp	new10|iss6	pab1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sugiyama T (2016)	26942678	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519196	2538913	2542001	275490	278485	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC20G8.06	ccr4	not1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sugiyama T (2016)	26942678	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519197	2538913	2538778	275490	275359	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC4G3.15c	ccr4	not2	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sugiyama T (2016)	26942678	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519198	2538913	2542126	275490	278602	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1B3.05	ccr4	not3	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sugiyama T (2016)	26942678	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519199	2538913	2539041	275490	275614	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC18.06c	ccr4	caf1	SPCC5E4.02c	pop2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sugiyama T (2016)	26942678	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519200	2538913	2542325	275490	278791	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC16C9.04c	ccr4	mot2	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sugiyama T (2016)	26942678	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519201	2538913	2542094	275490	278571	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC29B12.06c	ccr4	rcd1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sugiyama T (2016)	26942678	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519202	2538913	2539540	275490	276102	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC736.12c	ccr4	mmi1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sugiyama T (2016)	26942678	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519203	2538913	14218174	275490	4254536	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC19G12.17	ccr4	erh1	SPCC5E4.02c	new10|iss6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sugiyama T (2016)	26942678	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519204	2538913	2543254	275490	279682	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1006.03c	ccr4	red1	SPCC5E4.02c	iss3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sugiyama T (2016)	26942678	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519205	2538913	2542173	275490	278648	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC17H9.02	ccr4	mtl1	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC17H9.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sugiyama T (2016)	26942678	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519206	2538913	2541655	275490	278151	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC7D4.14c	ccr4	iss10	SPCC5E4.02c	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sugiyama T (2016)	26942678	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519207	2538913	2539733	275490	276285	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC16E9.12c	ccr4	pab2	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Sugiyama T (2016)	26942678	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519208	2538913	2541143	275490	277658	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC725.08	ccr4	pir2	SPCC5E4.02c	SPBC725.08|ars2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sugiyama T (2016)	26942678	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519209	2543580	2540584	279995	277110	SPAC644.14c	SPBC28F2.07	rad51	sfr1	rhp51	dds20|mug13	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kuwabara N (2012)	22405003	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519210	2540574	2540584	277101	277110	SPBC409.03	SPBC28F2.07	swi5	sfr1	-	dds20|mug13	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Kuwabara N (2012)	22405003	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519211	3361477	2541030	280553	277545	SPAC56F8.08	SPBC337.08c	mud1	ubi4	ddi1|ucp1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Weikart ND (2012)	22095407	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	#LPPI|Likely protein-protein interaction	-	BIOGRID
1519212	2543452	2540292	279872	276823	SPAC3G9.04	SPBC28F2.12	ssu72	rpb1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Schwer B (2015)	26264592	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
1519213	2541899	2540335	278389	276865	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC30B4.03c	set3	adn1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Zhou H (2015)	26173815	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	fitness|resistance to chemicals	Deletions displayed synthetic decrease of fitness in the presence of 6-AU in combination with deletion of set3	-	BIOGRID
1519214	2541899	2542652	278389	279106	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC1687.15	set3	gsk3	-	skp1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Zhou H (2015)	26173815	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	fitness|resistance to chemicals	Deletions displayed synthetic decrease of fitness in the presence of 6-AU in combination with deletion of set3	-	BIOGRID
1519215	2541899	2542114	278389	278590	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC30D11.05	set3	aps3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Zhou H (2015)	26173815	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	fitness|resistance to chemicals	Deletions displayed synthetic decrease of fitness in the presence of 6-AU in combination with deletion of set3	-	BIOGRID
1519216	2541899	2543339	278389	279762	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC630.13c	set3	tsc2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Zhou H (2015)	26173815	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	fitness|resistance to chemicals	Deletions displayed synthetic decrease of fitness in the presence of 6-AU in combination with deletion of set3	-	BIOGRID
1519217	2541899	2542523	278389	278981	SPAC22E12.11c	SPAC18B11.04	set3	ncs1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Zhou H (2015)	26173815	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation|fitness|resistance to chemicals	Deletions displayed synthetic decrease of fitness in the presence of 6-AU in combination with deletion of set3|ncs1/set3 mutants displayed a substantial decrease of long transcript to short transcript ratios relative to WT cells	-	BIOGRID
1519218	2541628	2540860	278124	277377	SPAC110.02	SPBC428.17c	pds5	wpl1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Murayama Y (2015)	26687354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519219	2539447	2540860	276010	277377	SPCC338.17c	SPBC428.17c	rad21	wpl1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Murayama Y (2015)	26687354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519220	2539447	2541628	276010	278124	SPCC338.17c	SPAC110.02	rad21	pds5	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Murayama Y (2015)	26687354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519221	2543010	2539447	279448	276010	SPAC10F6.09c	SPCC338.17c	psm3	rad21	smc3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Murayama Y (2015)	26687354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519222	2543010	2541628	279448	278124	SPAC10F6.09c	SPAC110.02	psm3	pds5	smc3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Murayama Y (2015)	26687354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519223	2543010	2542657	279448	279111	SPAC10F6.09c	SPAC31A2.05c	psm3	mis4	smc3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Murayama Y (2015)	26687354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519224	2543010	2539447	279448	276010	SPAC10F6.09c	SPCC338.17c	psm3	rad21	smc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Murayama Y (2015)	26687354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519225	2543010	2541628	279448	278124	SPAC10F6.09c	SPAC110.02	psm3	pds5	smc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Murayama Y (2015)	26687354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519226	2543010	2542657	279448	279111	SPAC10F6.09c	SPAC31A2.05c	psm3	mis4	smc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Murayama Y (2015)	26687354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519227	2543010	2540557	279448	277084	SPAC10F6.09c	SPBC29A10.04	psm3	psm1	smc3	smc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Murayama Y (2015)	26687354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519228	2543010	2542387	279448	278851	SPAC10F6.09c	SPAC17H9.20	psm3	psc3	smc3	SPAC607.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Murayama Y (2015)	26687354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519229	2543010	2540860	279448	277377	SPAC10F6.09c	SPBC428.17c	psm3	wpl1	smc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Murayama Y (2015)	26687354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519230	2543010	2542301	279448	278768	SPAC10F6.09c	SPAC1687.18c	psm3	ssl3	smc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Murayama Y (2015)	26687354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519231	2543010	2540557	279448	277084	SPAC10F6.09c	SPBC29A10.04	psm3	psm1	smc3	smc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Murayama Y (2015)	26687354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519232	2543010	2540557	279448	277084	SPAC10F6.09c	SPBC29A10.04	psm3	psm1	smc3	smc1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Murayama Y (2015)	26687354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519233	2542657	2540557	279111	277084	SPAC31A2.05c	SPBC29A10.04	mis4	psm1	-	smc1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Murayama Y (2015)	26687354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519234	2542387	2540557	278851	277084	SPAC17H9.20	SPBC29A10.04	psc3	psm1	SPAC607.01	smc1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Murayama Y (2015)	26687354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519235	2542387	2542657	278851	279111	SPAC17H9.20	SPAC31A2.05c	psc3	mis4	SPAC607.01	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Murayama Y (2015)	26687354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519236	2539467	2541264	276030	277778	SPCC417.07c	SPBC902.06	mto1	mto2	mbo1|mod20	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Borek WE (2015)	26243668	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519237	2539467	2540223	276030	276756	SPCC417.07c	SPBC32F12.04	mto1	gtb1	mbo1|mod20	tug1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Borek WE (2015)	26243668	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519238	2540601	9407016	277127	1028379	SPBC29A3.14c	SPNCRNA.214	trt1	ter1	-	SPNG585	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Webb CJ (2015)	26305931	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Trt1-Myc efficiently immunoprecipitated wild-type TER1	-	BIOGRID
1519287	2542047	2539403	278528	275968	SPAC21E11.03c	SPCC736.11	pcr1	ago1	mts2	csp9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Deng X (2015)	26443059	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	deletion of both mutants causes a defect in the formation of heterochromatin as measured by derepression of a ura4 marker	-	BIOGRID
1519288	2542047	2538769	278528	275352	SPAC21E11.03c	SPCC126.04c	pcr1	sgf73	mts2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Deng X (2015)	26443059	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	deletion of both mutants causes a defect in the formation of heterochromatin as measured by derepression of a ura4 marker	-	BIOGRID
1519289	2538769	2538930	275352	275506	SPCC126.04c	SPCC188.13c	sgf73	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Deng X (2015)	26443059	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	The silencing defect of otr1R::ura4+ in sgf73 mutant cells was substantially suppressed by overexpressing of dcr1, ago1 or clr4, as shown by the improved growth on 5FOA	-	BIOGRID
1519290	2538769	2539403	275352	275968	SPCC126.04c	SPCC736.11	sgf73	ago1	-	csp9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Deng X (2015)	26443059	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	The silencing defect of otr1R::ura4+ in sgf73 mutant cells was substantially suppressed by overexpressing of dcr1, ago1 or clr4, as shown by the improved growth on 5FOA	-	BIOGRID
1519291	2538769	2540825	275352	277343	SPCC126.04c	SPBC428.08c	sgf73	clr4	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Deng X (2015)	26443059	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	The silencing defect of otr1R::ura4+ in sgf73 mutant cells was substantially suppressed by overexpressing of dcr1, ago1 or clr4, as shown by the improved growth on 5FOA	-	BIOGRID
1519292	2538769	2539403	275352	275968	SPCC126.04c	SPCC736.11	sgf73	ago1	-	csp9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Deng X (2015)	26443059	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519293	2540735	2542239	277258	278711	SPBC83.03c	SPAC18G6.02c	tas3	chp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Deng X (2015)	26443059	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519294	2540735	2539403	277258	275968	SPBC83.03c	SPCC736.11	tas3	ago1	-	csp9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Deng X (2015)	26443059	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519295	2542239	2538769	278711	275352	SPAC18G6.02c	SPCC126.04c	chp1	sgf73	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Deng X (2015)	26443059	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519296	2542239	2539403	278711	275968	SPAC18G6.02c	SPCC736.11	chp1	ago1	-	csp9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Deng X (2015)	26443059	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519297	2542703	2539087	279156	275659	SPAC26H5.06	SPCC1259.13	pot1	chk1	-	rad27	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Habib AG (2015)	26093291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	deletion of chk1 suppressed the sensitivity to TBZ (Chebi:45979) of a pot1/rqh1 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1519298	2541620	2539087	278117	275659	SPAC2G11.12	SPCC1259.13	rqh1	chk1	hus2|rad12|rec9	rad27	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Habib AG (2015)	26093291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	deletion of chk1 suppressed the sensitivity to TBZ (Chebi:45979) of a pot1/rqh1 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1519299	2542703	2539123	279156	275695	SPAC26H5.06	SPCC18B5.03	pot1	wee1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Habib AG (2015)	26093291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	deletion of both wee1 and mik1 suppressed the sensitivity to TBZ (Chebi:45979) of a pot1/rqh1 mutant and the accumulation of recombination intermediates|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1519300	2541620	2539123	278117	275695	SPAC2G11.12	SPCC18B5.03	rqh1	wee1	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Habib AG (2015)	26093291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	deletion of both wee1 and mik1 suppressed the sensitivity to TBZ (Chebi:45979) of a pot1/rqh1 mutant and the accumulation of recombination intermediates|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1519301	2542703	2540885	279156	277402	SPAC26H5.06	SPBC660.14	pot1	mik1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Habib AG (2015)	26093291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	deletion of both wee1 and mik1 suppressed the sensitivity to TBZ (Chebi:45979) of a pot1/rqh1 mutant and the accumulation of recombination intermediates|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1519302	2541620	2540885	278117	277402	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC660.14	rqh1	mik1	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Habib AG (2015)	26093291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	deletion of both wee1 and mik1 suppressed the sensitivity to TBZ (Chebi:45979) of a pot1/rqh1 mutant and the accumulation of recombination intermediates|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
1519313	2541620	2539869	278117	276415	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC11B10.09	rqh1	cdc2	hus2|rad12|rec9	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Habib AG (2015)	26093291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	genetic complex|mutation of cdc2 suppressed the sensitivity to TBZ (Chebi:45979) of a pot1/rqh1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1519314	2542703	2539869	279156	276415	SPAC26H5.06	SPBC11B10.09	pot1	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Habib AG (2015)	26093291	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	genetic complex|mutation of cdc2 suppressed the sensitivity to TBZ (Chebi:45979) of a pot1/rqh1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
1519354	2541590	2539205	278087	275775	SPAC57A10.02	SPCC4B3.15	cdr2	mid1	-	dmf1	Two-hybrid	physical	Guzman-Vendrell M (2015)	26071525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519355	2541590	2539123	278087	275695	SPAC57A10.02	SPCC18B5.03	cdr2	wee1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Guzman-Vendrell M (2015)	26071525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519356	2541590	2539205	278087	275775	SPAC57A10.02	SPCC4B3.15	cdr2	mid1	-	dmf1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Guzman-Vendrell M (2015)	26071525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519357	2541590	2539123	278087	275695	SPAC57A10.02	SPCC18B5.03	cdr2	wee1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Guzman-Vendrell M (2015)	26071525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519358	2543666	2541590	280080	278087	SPAC644.06c	SPAC57A10.02	cdr1	cdr2	nim1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Guzman-Vendrell M (2015)	26071525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519419	2543010	2539658	279448	276213	SPAC10F6.09c	SPBC1105.17	psm3	cnp1	smc3	sim2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Folco HD (2015)	25619765	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	Suppressing positive genetic interaction	-	BIOGRID
1519420	2539658	2540915	276213	277431	SPBC1105.17	SPBC800.13	cnp1	cnp20	sim2	SPBC800.13	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Folco HD (2015)	25619765	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:undetermined|protein/peptide accumulation:undetermined|vegetative growth:undetermined	Cnp20 overexpression suppressed elevation of H3K9me2 in the central core in the presence of Quartertail  and reduced TBZ (Chebi:45979) sensitivity|Suppressing positive genetic interaction	-	BIOGRID
1519450	2542467	2540787	278928	277306	SPAC1834.04	SPBC1921.07c	hht1	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ringel AE (2015)	26401015	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519451	2542513	2542467	278971	278928	SPAC1952.05	SPAC1834.04	gcn5	hht1	kat2	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Ringel AE (2015)	26401015	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Acetylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519452	2542513	2542463	278971	278924	SPAC1952.05	SPAC1834.03c	gcn5	hhf1	kat2	h4.1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Ringel AE (2015)	26401015	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Acetylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1519631	2540635	2539513	277161	276075	SPBC23G7.08c	SPCC645.05c	rga7	myo2	-	rng5	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Arasada R (2015)	25977474	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|viability	isophenotypic enhancing genetic interaction	-	BIOGRID
1519632	2540635	2541603	277161	278100	SPBC23G7.08c	SPAC1F5.04c	rga7	cdc12	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Arasada R (2015)	25977474	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|viability	cisphenotypic enhancing genetic interaction at 36 degrees|monophenotypic enhancing genetic interaction at 25 degrees	-	BIOGRID
1519633	2540635	2541975	277161	278460	SPBC23G7.08c	SPAC20G8.05c	rga7	cdc15	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Arasada R (2015)	25977474	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|viability	cisphenotypic masking genetic interaction at 36 degrees|monophenotypic neutral genetic interaction at 25 degrees	-	BIOGRID
1519634	2540635	2543129	277161	279561	SPBC23G7.08c	SPAC4F8.13c	rga7	rng2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Arasada R (2015)	25977474	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|viability	cisphenotypic enhancing genetic interaction at 36 degrees|isophenotypic enhancing genetic interaction at 25 degrees	-	BIOGRID
1521083	2541889	2541590	278379	278087	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC57A10.02	pom1	cdr2	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kettenbach AN (2015)	25720772	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1521084	2541889	2539642	278379	276197	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC1706.01	pom1	tea4	-	wsh3	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kettenbach AN (2015)	25720772	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1521085	2541889	2540894	278379	277410	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC530.04	pom1	mod5	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kettenbach AN (2015)	25720772	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1521086	2541889	2540635	278379	277161	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC23G7.08c	pom1	rga7	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kettenbach AN (2015)	25720772	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1521087	2541889	2539537	278379	276099	SPAC2F7.03c	SPCP1E11.04c	pom1	pal1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kettenbach AN (2015)	25720772	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1521088	2541889	2541783	278379	278276	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC11E3.11c	pom1	syt22	-	SPAC11E3.11c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kettenbach AN (2015)	25720772	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1521089	2539537	2539642	276099	276197	SPCP1E11.04c	SPBC1706.01	pal1	tea4	-	wsh3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kettenbach AN (2015)	25720772	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|viability	at high temperatures	-	BIOGRID
1521090	2541783	2539642	278276	276197	SPAC11E3.11c	SPBC1706.01	syt22	tea4	SPAC11E3.11c	wsh3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kettenbach AN (2015)	25720772	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	double mutant cells exhibited a striking kinked cell shape that was not observed in either single mutant	-	BIOGRID
1521596	2540886	2540384	277403	276913	SPBC4F6.10	SPBC29A10.11c	vps901	vps902	vps9a	vps9b	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tsukamoto Y (2015)	25686494	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|heat sensitivity|ionic stress resistance|mating efficiency|sporulation|vegetative growth|vesicle distribution	-	-	BIOGRID
1521878	2539527	2543387	276089	279809	SPCC338.16	SPAPB1E7.02c	pof3	mcl1	-	slr3	Two-hybrid	physical	Maculins T (2015)	26255844	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1521879	2543387	2539527	279809	276089	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC338.16	mcl1	pof3	slr3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Maculins T (2015)	26255844	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1524133	3020	2542278	109272	278747	RP11-396C23.1	SPAC17G8.07	H3F3A	yaf9	H3.3A|H3F3	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Li Y (2014)	25417107	9606	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526599	2541587	2539020	278084	275593	SPAC14C4.02c	SPCC5E4.06	smc5	smc6	spr18	rad18	Two-hybrid	physical	Zabrady K (2016)	26446992	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526600	2539436	2541071	275999	277586	SPCC645.04	SPBC582.05c	nse3	brc1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Zabrady K (2016)	26446992	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526601	2539436	2541620	275999	278117	SPCC645.04	SPAC2G11.12	nse3	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Zabrady K (2016)	26446992	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526607	2541772	2543344	278266	279766	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC56E4.04c	hsp3106	cut6	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526608	2541772	2538902	278266	275480	SPAC22E12.03c	SPCC13B11.01	hsp3106	adh1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	adh	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526609	2541772	2542115	278266	278591	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC1834.02	hsp3106	aro1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526610	2541772	2542597	278266	279051	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAP8A3.07c	hsp3106	SPAP8A3.07c	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526611	2541772	2541050	278266	277565	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC428.05c	hsp3106	arg12	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526612	2541772	2541526	278266	278026	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC14C4.14	hsp3106	atp1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526613	2541772	2539195	278266	275766	SPAC22E12.03c	SPCC18B5.01c	hsp3106	bfr1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	SPCPJ732.04c|hba2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526614	2541772	2540729	278266	277252	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC215.08c	hsp3106	arg4	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526615	2541772	2542744	278266	279194	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC1565.08	hsp3106	cdc48	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526616	2541772	2539148	278266	275720	SPAC22E12.03c	SPCC132.04c	hsp3106	gdh2	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526617	2541772	2542121	278266	278597	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC17H9.05	hsp3106	ebp2	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526618	2541772	2542298	278266	278765	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC29A4.02c	hsp3106	SPAC29A4.02c	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	tef3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526619	2541772	2540210	278266	276743	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC9B6.04c	hsp3106	tuf1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526620	2541772	2539479	278266	276042	SPAC22E12.03c	SPCC584.04	hsp3106	sup35	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	erf3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526621	2541772	2543618	278266	280032	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC4A8.11c	hsp3106	fas2	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	lsd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526622	2541772	2540479	278266	277007	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC2D10.10c	hsp3106	fib1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	fib|nop1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526623	2541772	2540975	278266	277491	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC354.12	hsp3106	gpd3	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526624	2541772	2540705	278266	277228	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC20F10.01	hsp3106	gar1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	SPBC25H2.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526625	2541772	2543509	278266	279927	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAPB1E7.07	hsp3106	glt1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	gog1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526626	2541772	2541852	278266	278343	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC23H3.09c	hsp3106	gly1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526627	2541772	2540455	278266	276983	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC215.05	hsp3106	gpd1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526628	2541772	2541815	278266	278306	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC22A12.15c	hsp3106	bip1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	bip	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526629	2541772	2542467	278266	278928	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC1834.04	hsp3106	hht1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526630	2541772	2540326	278266	276856	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC2G5.06c	hsp3106	hmt2	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	cad1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526631	2541772	2539815	278266	276365	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC1105.02c	hsp3106	lys4	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526632	2541772	2540977	278266	277493	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC3E7.02c	hsp3106	hsp16	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526633	2541772	3361514	278266	280590	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC110.04c	hsp3106	pss1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	SPAP14E8.01c|ssp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526634	2541772	2542634	278266	279088	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC24H6.04	hsp3106	hxk1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526635	2541772	2542598	278266	279052	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC6G10.08	hsp3106	idp1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526636	2541772	2539972	278266	276516	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC16H5.02	hsp3106	pfk1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526637	2541772	2538924	278266	275501	SPAC22E12.03c	SPCC1620.06c	hsp3106	SPCC1620.06c	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526638	2541772	2540731	278266	277254	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC18H10.02	hsp3106	lcf1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526639	2541772	2540283	278266	276814	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC1A4.02c	hsp3106	leu1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	SPBC1E8.07c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526640	2541772	2539671	278266	276226	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC1734.11	hsp3106	mas5	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526641	2541772	2538821	278266	275402	SPAC22E12.03c	SPCC584.01c	hsp3106	SPCC584.01c	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526642	2541772	2539652	278266	276207	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC1703.13c	hsp3106	SPBC1703.13c	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526643	2541772	2538743	278266	275326	SPAC22E12.03c	SPCC1906.01	hsp3106	mpg1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526644	2541772	2540211	278266	276744	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC947.15c	hsp3106	nde1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	SPBC947.15c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526645	2541772	2542636	278266	279090	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAP27G11.13c	hsp3106	nop10	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526646	2541772	2541087	278266	277602	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC646.10c	hsp3106	SPBC646.10c	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526647	2541772	2541814	278266	278305	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC23G3.06	hsp3106	SPAC23G3.06	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526648	2541772	2541874	278266	278364	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC1F8.07c	hsp3106	SPAC1F8.07c	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526649	2541772	2543400	278266	279822	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC3G9.11c	hsp3106	SPAC3G9.11c	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526650	2541772	2538981	278266	275555	SPAC22E12.03c	SPCC330.06c	hsp3106	pmp20	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	SPCC330.06c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526651	2541772	2539189	278266	275760	SPAC22E12.03c	SPCC1682.16	hsp3106	rpt4	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	SPCC306.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526652	2541772	3361462	278266	280538	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC3A11.12c	hsp3106	rpt5	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	pam2|tbp1|SPAC3H5.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526653	2541772	2540487	278266	277015	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC23G7.12c	hsp3106	rpt6	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	let1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526654	2541772	2538734	278266	275318	SPAC22E12.03c	SPCC1322.13	hsp3106	ade6	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	min1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526655	2541772	2539661	278266	276216	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC17G9.11c	hsp3106	pyr1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526656	2541772	2541544	278266	278044	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC22G7.06c	hsp3106	ura1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526657	2541772	2542252	278266	278722	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC17A2.13c	hsp3106	rad25	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526658	2541772	2541612	278266	278109	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC1F7.04	hsp3106	rho1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526659	2541772	2539846	278266	276394	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC17G9.10	hsp3106	rpl1102	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rpl11-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526660	2541772	2539010	278266	275583	SPAC22E12.03c	SPCC31H12.04c	hsp3106	rpl1202	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rpl12|rpl12-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526661	2541772	2542425	278266	278887	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC1805.13	hsp3106	rpl14	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526662	2541772	2542370	278266	278834	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC1783.08c	hsp3106	rpl1502	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rpl15-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526663	2541772	2540358	278266	276887	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC2F12.04	hsp3106	rpl1701	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rpl17|rpl17-1|SPCC2F12.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526664	2541772	2539678	278266	276233	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC11C11.07	hsp3106	rpl1801	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rpl18|rpl18-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526665	2541772	3361377	278266	280453	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAPB17E12.13	hsp3106	rpl1802	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rpl18-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526666	2541772	2542093	278266	278570	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC26A3.04	hsp3106	rpl2002	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rpl20|rpl20-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526667	2541772	2540950	278266	277466	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC365.03c	hsp3106	rpl2101	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rpl21|rpl21-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526668	2541772	2539286	278266	275854	SPAC22E12.03c	SPCC1322.11	hsp3106	rpl2302	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rpl23-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526669	2541772	2538849	278266	275430	SPAC22E12.03c	SPCC330.14c	hsp3106	rpl2402	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rpl24-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526670	2541772	2539701	278266	276254	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC106.18	hsp3106	rpl2501	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rpl25a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526671	2541772	2540851	278266	277368	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC4F6.04	hsp3106	rpl2502	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rpl23a-2|rpl25b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526672	2541772	2540274	278266	276805	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC29B5.03c	hsp3106	rpl26	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526673	2541772	2541156	278266	277671	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC685.07c	hsp3106	rpl2701	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rpl27-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526674	2541772	2539336	278266	275902	SPAC22E12.03c	SPCC74.05	hsp3106	rpl2702	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rpl27-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526675	2541772	2539548	278266	276109	SPAC22E12.03c	SPCC5E4.07	hsp3106	rpl2802	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rpl28|rpl28-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526676	2541772	2541172	278266	277686	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC776.01	hsp3106	rpl29	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526677	2541772	2540366	278266	276895	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC2F12.07c	hsp3106	rpl802	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rpk37|rpk5b|rpl8-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526678	2541772	2542661	278266	279114	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC1250.05	hsp3106	rpl3002	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rpl30|rpl30-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526679	2541772	2543475	278266	279895	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC890.08	hsp3106	rpl31	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526680	2541772	2543460	278266	279880	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC3H5.10	hsp3106	rpl3202	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rpl32|rpl32-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526681	2541772	2539518	278266	276080	SPAC22E12.03c	SPCP31B10.08c	hsp3106	rpl35a	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rpl33	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526682	2541772	2539308	278266	275875	SPAC22E12.03c	SPCC613.05c	hsp3106	rpl35	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526683	2541772	2540644	278266	277169	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC405.07	hsp3106	rpl3602	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rpl36|rpl36-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526684	2541772	2543309	278266	279733	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAPB8E5.06c	hsp3106	rpl302	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rpl3-2|rpl3-b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526685	2541772	2540682	278266	277207	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC800.04c	hsp3106	rpl4301	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rpl37a-1|rpl43|rpl43-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526686	2541772	2541344	278266	277855	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBP8B7.03c	hsp3106	rpl402	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rpl4|rpl4-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526687	2541772	2539780	278266	276330	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC1711.06	hsp3106	rpl401	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rpl4|rpl4-1|rpl4-2|rpl402	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526688	2541772	2539680	278266	276235	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC11C11.09c	hsp3106	rpl502	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rpl5-2|rpl5b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526689	2541772	2539372	278266	275938	SPAC22E12.03c	SPCC622.18	hsp3106	rpl6	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526690	2541772	2543448	278266	279868	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC3H5.07	hsp3106	rpl702	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526691	2541772	2540841	278266	277358	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC18H10.12c	hsp3106	rpl701	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rpl7|rpl7-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526692	2541772	2540517	278266	277045	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC29A3.04	hsp3106	rpl8	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rpl701|rpl7a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526693	2541772	2543380	278266	279802	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC4G9.16c	hsp3106	rpl901	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rpl9-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526694	2541772	2539464	278266	276027	SPAC22E12.03c	SPCC613.06	hsp3106	rpl902	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rpl9-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526695	2541772	2539434	278266	275997	SPAC22E12.03c	SPCC757.09c	hsp3106	rnc1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526696	2541772	2542821	278266	279268	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC144.12	hsp3106	SPAC144.12	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526697	2541772	2538897	278266	275475	SPAC22E12.03c	SPCC1183.07	hsp3106	SPCC1183.07	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526698	2541772	2542904	278266	279348	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC144.11	hsp3106	rps1102	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rps11|rps11-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526699	2541772	2542108	278266	278584	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC6F6.07c	hsp3106	rps13	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526700	2541772	2540817	278266	277335	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC3H5.05c	hsp3106	rps1401	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rps14|rps14-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526701	2541772	2538892	278266	275470	SPAC22E12.03c	SPCC1393.03	hsp3106	rps1501	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rps15-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526702	2541772	2542912	278266	279355	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC1071.07c	hsp3106	rps1502	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rps15|rps15-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526703	2541772	2539331	278266	275897	SPAC22E12.03c	SPCC24B10.09	hsp3106	rps1702	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rps17|rps17-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526704	2541772	2540180	278266	276713	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC16D10.11c	hsp3106	rps1801	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rps18-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526705	2541772	2540447	278266	276975	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC21C3.13	hsp3106	rps1901	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rps19-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526706	2541772	2541977	278266	278462	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC5D6.01	hsp3106	rps2202	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rps15a-2|rps22-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526707	2541772	2542430	278266	278892	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC17G6.06	hsp3106	rps2401	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rps24|rps24-1|rps24a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526708	2541772	2543307	278266	279731	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC694.05c	hsp3106	rps2502	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rps25|rps25-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526709	2541772	2542538	278266	278995	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC1805.11c	hsp3106	rps2602	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rps26-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526710	2541772	2539067	278266	275639	SPAC22E12.03c	SPCC576.08c	hsp3106	rps2	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526711	2541772	2542817	278266	279264	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC13G6.02c	hsp3106	rps101	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rps1-1|rps3a-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526712	2541772	2541737	278266	278231	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC22H12.04c	hsp3106	rps102	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rps1-2|rps3a-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526713	2541772	2539797	278266	276347	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC16G5.14c	hsp3106	rps3	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526714	2541772	2540325	278266	276855	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC21B10.10	hsp3106	rps402	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rps4-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526715	2541772	2543486	278266	279906	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC959.07	hsp3106	rps403	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rps4|rps4-3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526716	2541772	2541712	278266	278207	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC328.10c	hsp3106	rps502	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rps5-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526717	2541772	2543581	278266	279996	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAPB1E7.12	hsp3106	rps602	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rps6|rps6-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526718	2541772	2542553	278266	279010	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC18G6.14c	hsp3106	rps7	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526719	2541772	2543354	278266	279776	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC521.05	hsp3106	rps802	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rps8-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526720	2541772	2540367	278266	276896	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC29A3.12	hsp3106	rps902	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rps9-2|rps9b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526721	2541772	2541077	278266	277592	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC83.08	hsp3106	rvb2	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526722	2541772	2539093	278266	275665	SPAC22E12.03c	SPCC736.15	hsp3106	pil1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	SPCC736.15	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526723	2541772	2540149	278266	276686	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC1289.03c	hsp3106	spi1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526724	2541772	2539391	278266	275956	SPAC22E12.03c	SPCC1682.05c	hsp3106	srp68	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526725	2541772	2539168	278266	275739	SPAC22E12.03c	SPCC1620.08	hsp3106	SPCC1620.08	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526726	2541772	2542408	278266	278872	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC17A5.15c	hsp3106	gus1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	SPAC17A5.15c|ers1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526727	2541772	2543181	278266	279611	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC3F10.03	hsp3106	grs1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526728	2541772	2540052	278266	276590	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC17A3.04c	hsp3106	rar1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	mes1|mrs1|pi042	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526729	2541772	2540582	278266	277108	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC26H8.07c	hsp3106	nda3	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	alp12|ben1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526730	2541772	2541062	278266	277577	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC660.11	hsp3106	tcg1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	mug187	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526731	2541772	2540526	278266	277054	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC26H8.01	hsp3106	thi2	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	nmt2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526732	2541772	2541872	278266	278362	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC23H4.10c	hsp3106	thi4	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526733	2541772	2543304	278266	279728	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC6B12.12	hsp3106	tom70	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526734	2541772	3361358	278266	280434	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC3F6.03	hsp3106	trr1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	caf4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526735	2541772	2543672	278266	280086	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC4H3.01	hsp3106	SPAC4H3.01	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526736	2541772	2540078	278266	276616	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC16H5.08c	hsp3106	SPBC16H5.08c	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526737	2541772	2539538	278266	276100	SPAC22E12.03c	SPCC364.06	hsp3106	nap1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	nap11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526738	2541772	2541772	278266	278266	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC22E12.03c	hsp3106	hsp3106	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526739	2541772	2542131	278266	278607	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC57A7.12	hsp3106	SPAC57A7.12	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526740	2541772	2542612	278266	279066	SPAC22E12.03c	SPACUNK4.15	hsp3106	SPACUNK4.15	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526741	2541772	2542698	278266	279151	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC26H5.09c	hsp3106	SPAC26H5.09c	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526742	2541772	2542456	278266	278917	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC19G12.05	hsp3106	SPAC19G12.05	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526743	2541772	2541464	278266	277966	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC222.08c	hsp3106	SPAC222.08c	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526744	2541772	2540393	278266	276921	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC19F5.03	hsp3106	sac11	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	SPBC19F5.03	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526745	2541772	2543333	278266	279756	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC694.02	hsp3106	SPAC694.02	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526746	2541772	2541651	278266	278147	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC25B8.12c	hsp3106	SPAC25B8.12c	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526747	2541772	2543631	278266	280045	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC458.02c	hsp3106	SPAC458.02c	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526748	2541772	2539784	278266	276334	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC1703.10	hsp3106	ypt1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526749	2541772	2543021	278266	279457	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC11E3.15	hsp3106	rpl22	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	SPAP8A3.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526750	2540026	2540629	276570	277155	SPBC16D10.08c	SPBC21D10.09c	hsp104	rkr1	SPBC16D10.08c	SPBC21D10.09c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	Expression of Sdj1-L169P in mutants lacking both Ltn1 and Hsp104 resulted in an intermediate phenotype that appeared more like the situation in the wild type strain	-	BIOGRID
1526751	2542239	2539817	278711	276367	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC146.03c	chp1	cut3	-	smc4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	He H (2016)	26832414	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526752	2539209	2539209	275779	275779	SPCC23B6.03c	SPCC23B6.03c	tel1	tel1	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Wang X (2016)	27229179	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	homodimer	-	BIOGRID
1526861	2539963	2541171	276507	277685	SPBC17F3.02	SPBC887.09c	nak1	sog2	mor4|orb3	SPBC887.09c|lrp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Cipak L (2013)	23462181	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526862	2539963	2541972	276507	278457	SPBC17F3.02	SPAC23C11.11	nak1	cka1	mor4|orb3	orb5	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Cipak L (2013)	23462181	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526863	2539963	2542564	276507	279020	SPBC17F3.02	SPAC1851.03	nak1	ckb1	mor4|orb3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Cipak L (2013)	23462181	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526864	2539963	2540306	276507	276836	SPBC17F3.02	SPBC2G5.02c	nak1	ckb2	mor4|orb3	SPBC2G5.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Cipak L (2013)	23462181	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526865	2541972	2541171	278457	277685	SPAC23C11.11	SPBC887.09c	cka1	sog2	orb5	SPBC887.09c|lrp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Cipak L (2013)	23462181	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526866	2541972	2539963	278457	276507	SPAC23C11.11	SPBC17F3.02	cka1	nak1	orb5	mor4|orb3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Cipak L (2013)	23462181	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526867	2541972	2542564	278457	279020	SPAC23C11.11	SPAC1851.03	cka1	ckb1	orb5	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Cipak L (2013)	23462181	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526868	2541972	2540306	278457	276836	SPAC23C11.11	SPBC2G5.02c	cka1	ckb2	orb5	SPBC2G5.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Cipak L (2013)	23462181	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526869	2541171	2541972	277685	278457	SPBC887.09c	SPAC23C11.11	sog2	cka1	SPBC887.09c|lrp1	orb5	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Cipak L (2013)	23462181	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526870	2541171	2539963	277685	276507	SPBC887.09c	SPBC17F3.02	sog2	nak1	SPBC887.09c|lrp1	mor4|orb3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Cipak L (2013)	23462181	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526871	2541171	2542564	277685	279020	SPBC887.09c	SPAC1851.03	sog2	ckb1	SPBC887.09c|lrp1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Cipak L (2013)	23462181	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
1526872	2541171	2540306	277685	276836	SPBC887.09c	SPBC2G5.02c	sog2	ckb2	SPBC887.09c|lrp1	SPBC2G5.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Cipak L (2013)	23462181	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2202673	2543441	2542635	279861	279089	SPAC821.12	SPAC24H6.09	orb6	gef1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Das M (2015)	26246599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2202675	2542029	2542635	278511	279089	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC24H6.09	rad24	gef1	anr5|sam4	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Das M (2015)	26246599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2202676	2542029	2542635	278511	279089	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC24H6.09	rad24	gef1	anr5|sam4	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Das M (2015)	26246599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:partial rescue	deletion of the gef1 gene rescues the altered cell shape of rad24 mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
2202677	2539642	2542635	276197	279089	SPBC1706.01	SPAC24H6.09	tea4	gef1	wsh3	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Das M (2015)	26246599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	bipolar budding pattern:partial rescue	deletion of the gef1 gene rescues bipolar growth in tea4 cells	-	BIOGRID
2202678	2542635	2540593	279089	277119	SPAC24H6.09	SPBC28E12.03	gef1	rga4	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Das M (2015)	26246599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape:wild type	moderately increasing the levels of Cdc42 GAP Rga4 by inducing its expression from the nmt1 promoter could fully rescue the wider diameter of gef1S112A mutants	-	BIOGRID
2202679	2542635	2540593	279089	277119	SPAC24H6.09	SPBC28E12.03	gef1	rga4	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Das M (2015)	26246599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	gef1S112A/rga4 cells are almost completely round, with a considerably increased cell diameter	-	BIOGRID
2207869	2540744	2540277	277267	276808	SPBC1604.21c	SPBC2D10.20	ptr3	ubc1	SPBC211.09|uba1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lv Z (2017)	28162934	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	uba1 transfers ubiquitin to E2s in vitro|ubiquitin transthiolation	-	BIOGRID
2207870	2540744	2542622	277267	279076	SPBC1604.21c	SPAC18B11.07c	ptr3	rhp6	SPBC211.09|uba1	sng1|ubc2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lv Z (2017)	28162934	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	uba1 transfers ubiquitin to E2s in vitro|ubiquitin transthiolation	-	BIOGRID
2207871	2540744	2540083	277267	276621	SPBC1604.21c	SPBC119.02	ptr3	ubc4	SPBC211.09|uba1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lv Z (2017)	28162934	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	uba1 transfers ubiquitin to E2s in vitro|ubiquitin transthiolation	-	BIOGRID
2207872	2540744	2541642	277267	278138	SPBC1604.21c	SPAC10F6.05c	ptr3	ubc6	SPBC211.09|uba1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lv Z (2017)	28162934	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	uba1 transfers ubiquitin to E2s in vitro|ubiquitin transthiolation	-	BIOGRID
2207873	2540744	2541252	277267	277766	SPBC1604.21c	SPBP16F5.04	ptr3	ubc7	SPBC211.09|uba1	ubcP3|ubc3	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lv Z (2017)	28162934	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	uba1 transfers ubiquitin to E2s in vitro|ubiquitin transthiolation	-	BIOGRID
2207874	2540744	2540738	277267	277261	SPBC1604.21c	SPBC211.07c	ptr3	ubc8	SPBC211.09|uba1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lv Z (2017)	28162934	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	uba1 transfers ubiquitin to E2s in vitro|ubiquitin transthiolation	-	BIOGRID
2207875	2540744	2539190	277267	275761	SPBC1604.21c	SPCC1259.15c	ptr3	ubc11	SPBC211.09|uba1	ubcdp|ubcp4	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lv Z (2017)	28162934	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	uba1 transfers ubiquitin to E2s in vitro|ubiquitin transthiolation	-	BIOGRID
2207876	2540744	2542925	277267	279366	SPBC1604.21c	SPAC11E3.04c	ptr3	ubc13	SPBC211.09|uba1	spu13|sst5	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lv Z (2017)	28162934	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	uba1 transfers ubiquitin to E2s in vitro|ubiquitin transthiolation	-	BIOGRID
2207877	2540744	2541565	277267	278063	SPBC1604.21c	SPAC1250.03	ptr3	ubc14	SPBC211.09|uba1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lv Z (2017)	28162934	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	uba1 transfers ubiquitin to E2s in vitro|ubiquitin transthiolation	-	BIOGRID
2207878	2540744	2539995	277267	276539	SPBC1604.21c	SPBC1105.09	ptr3	ubc15	SPBC211.09|uba1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lv Z (2017)	28162934	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	uba1 transfers ubiquitin to E2s in vitro|ubiquitin transthiolation	-	BIOGRID
2207879	2540744	2539995	277267	276539	SPBC1604.21c	SPBC1105.09	ptr3	ubc15	SPBC211.09|uba1	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Lv Z (2017)	28162934	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2210650	2541728	2543455	278222	279875	SPAC20G4.03c	SPAC3G9.09c	hri1	tif211	-	eIF2alpha	Biochemical Activity	physical	Berlanga JJ (2010)	19880757	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2327603	2542375	2539407	278839	275972	SPAC6G10.05c	SPCC970.09	trs120	sec8	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Wang N (2016)	27082518	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
2327604	2542375	2540127	278839	276664	SPAC6G10.05c	SPBC106.20	trs120	exo70	-	SPBC582.02	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang N (2016)	27082518	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2327633	2542375	2542219	278839	278693	SPAC6G10.05c	SPAC18G6.03	trs120	ypt3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Wang N (2016)	27082518	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
2327634	2542375	2538961	278839	275535	SPAC6G10.05c	SPCC285.14	trs120	trs130	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Wang N (2016)	27082518	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2327635	2542375	2538822	278839	275403	SPAC6G10.05c	SPCC1840.02c	trs120	bgs4	-	cwg1|orb11|pbr1|sph1	Co-localization	physical	Wang N (2016)	27082518	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2327636	2542375	2542219	278839	278693	SPAC6G10.05c	SPAC18G6.03	trs120	ypt3	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Wang N (2016)	27082518	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2327637	2540560	2543039	277087	279474	SPBC2D10.14c	SPAC3A12.14	myo51	cam1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Tang Q (2016)	27432898	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2327638	2540560	2541699	277087	278195	SPBC2D10.14c	SPAP8A3.08	myo51	cdc4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Tang Q (2016)	27432898	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2327639	2540560	2543546	277087	279963	SPBC2D10.14c	SPAC4H3.14c	myo51	rng8	-	SPAC4H3.14c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Tang Q (2016)	27432898	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2327640	2540560	2541283	277087	277796	SPBC2D10.14c	SPBP8B7.02	myo51	rng9	-	SPBP8B7.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Tang Q (2016)	27432898	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2327680	2540115	2541973	276652	278458	SPBC1778.02	SPAC6G9.13c	rap1	bqt1	-	mug23|rec26	Two-hybrid	physical	Amelina H (2015)	26058898	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2327681	2540115	2543273	276652	279701	SPBC1778.02	SPAC1002.06c	rap1	bqt2	-	mug18|rec23	Two-hybrid	physical	Amelina H (2015)	26058898	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2327682	2540115	2540694	276652	277218	SPBC1778.02	SPBC19C7.10	rap1	bqt4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Amelina H (2015)	26058898	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2327683	2540115	2542244	276652	278714	SPBC1778.02	SPAC19G12.13c	rap1	poz1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Amelina H (2015)	26058898	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2327747	2539705	2539291	276258	275859	SPBC1105.10	SPCC757.10	rav1	vph2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2016)	26891792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to doxorubicin	-	BIOGRID
2327748	2542674	2539403	279127	275968	SPAC26A3.12c	SPCC736.11	dhp1	ago1	rat1	csp9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tucker JF (2016)	26889830	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	double mutants show an enhanced loss of silencing	-	BIOGRID
2327749	2542674	2538930	279127	275506	SPAC26A3.12c	SPCC188.13c	dhp1	dcr1	rat1	SPCC584.10c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tucker JF (2016)	26889830	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	double mutants show an enhanced loss of silencing	-	BIOGRID
2327750	2542674	2543630	279127	280044	SPAC26A3.12c	SPAC1F3.01	dhp1	rrp6	rat1	SPAC3H8.11	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tucker JF (2016)	26889830	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	double mutants show an enhanced loss of silencing	-	BIOGRID
2327751	2542674	2540821	279127	277339	SPAC26A3.12c	SPBC800.03	dhp1	clr3	rat1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tucker JF (2016)	26889830	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	double mutants show an enhanced loss of silencing	-	BIOGRID
2327752	2542674	3361342	279127	280418	SPAC26A3.12c	SPBC16D10.07c	dhp1	sir2	rat1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tucker JF (2016)	26889830	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	double mutants show an enhanced loss of silencing	-	BIOGRID
2327753	2542674	2542097	279127	278573	SPAC26A3.12c	SPACUNK4.06c	dhp1	rpb7	rat1	SPAPYUK71.02	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tucker JF (2016)	26889830	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viable	-	-	BIOGRID
2327754	2542674	2541446	279127	277951	SPAC26A3.12c	SPAC23G3.01	dhp1	rpb2	rat1	SPAC521.06	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tucker JF (2016)	26889830	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	double mutants show an enhanced loss of silencing	-	BIOGRID
2327755	2539285	2543086	275853	279519	SPCC1672.02c	SPAC30D11.10	sap1	rad52	-	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mizuguchi T (2017)	28490498	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2327756	2540718	2541929	277241	278417	SPBC3H7.15	SPAC23C4.12	hhp1	hhp2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiotic recombination|sporulation efficiency|vegetative growth	double mutants show reduced recombination	-	BIOGRID
2327760	2538994	2542150	275568	278626	SPCC553.01c	SPAC17A5.11	dbl2	rec12	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	spo11	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Polakova S (2016)	27304859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2327761	2538994	2543670	275568	280084	SPCC553.01c	SPAPB1E7.06c	dbl2	eme1	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	mms4|slx2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Polakova S (2016)	27304859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2327762	2538994	2543580	275568	279995	SPCC553.01c	SPAC644.14c	dbl2	rad51	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	rhp51	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Polakova S (2016)	27304859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2327763	2538994	2541620	275568	278117	SPCC553.01c	SPAC2G11.12	dbl2	rqh1	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Polakova S (2016)	27304859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viable	-	-	BIOGRID
2327764	2538994	2543580	275568	279995	SPCC553.01c	SPAC644.14c	dbl2	rad51	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	rhp51	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Polakova S (2016)	27304859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viable:wild type	deletion of rad51 rescues the lethality of a dbl2/rqh1 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2327765	2541620	2543580	278117	279995	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC644.14c	rqh1	rad51	hus2|rad12|rec9	rhp51	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Polakova S (2016)	27304859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viable:wild type	deletion of rad51 rescues the lethality of a dbl2/rqh1 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2327766	2538994	2540244	275568	276776	SPCC553.01c	SPBC336.01	dbl2	fbh1	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	fdh|fdh1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Polakova S (2016)	27304859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:wild type|resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2327768	2539844	2540159	276392	276694	SPBC1718.06	SPBC12C2.08	msp1	dnm1	mgm1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Delerue T (2016)	27664110	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitochondrial genome maintenance:undetermined|mitochondrial morphology:undetermined|viable:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
2327769	2539844	2539939	276392	276483	SPBC1718.06	SPBC11G11.01	msp1	fis1	mgm1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Delerue T (2016)	27664110	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitochondrial genome maintenance:undetermined|mitochondrial morphology:undetermined|viable:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
2327770	2539844	3361526	276392	280602	SPBC1718.06	SPAC664.15	msp1	caf4	mgm1	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Delerue T (2016)	27664110	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitochondrial genome maintenance:undetermined|mitochondrial morphology:undetermined|viable:undetermined	-	-	BIOGRID
2327771	2538993	2542652	275567	279106	SPCC162.12	SPAC1687.15	tco89	gsk3	SPCC1753.06c	skp1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2327772	2542652	2539109	279106	275681	SPAC1687.15	SPCC74.03c	gsk3	ssp2	skp1	ucp9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	double mutants show increased resistance to caffeine and rapamycin	-	BIOGRID
2327773	2542652	2539130	279106	275702	SPAC1687.15	SPCC1919.03c	gsk3	amk2	skp1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	double mutants show increased resistance to caffeine and rapamycin	-	BIOGRID
2332712	2540304	2542773	276834	279222	SPBC354.13	SPAC16.01	rga6	rho2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Revilla-Guarinos MT (2016)	26960792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332713	2540304	2543027	276834	279463	SPBC354.13	SPAC110.03	rga6	cdc42	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Revilla-Guarinos MT (2016)	26960792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332714	2540304	2540593	276834	277119	SPBC354.13	SPBC28E12.03	rga6	rga4	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Revilla-Guarinos MT (2016)	26960792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology|protein/peptide distribution	cis-phenotypic enhancing interaction|double mutants show an additive effect on cell morphology	-	BIOGRID
2332715	2542337	2540593	278803	277119	SPAC16E8.09	SPBC28E12.03	scd1	rga4	ral1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Revilla-Guarinos MT (2016)	26960792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology|protein/peptide distribution	cis-phenotypic enhancing interaction|double mutants show an additive effect on cell morphology	-	BIOGRID
2332717	2539505	2539864	276068	276411	SPCC736.14	SPBC16A3.15c	dis1	nda2	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Matsuo Y (2016)	27872152	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332718	2542123	2539505	278599	276068	SPAC18G6.15	SPCC736.14	mal3	dis1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Matsuo Y (2016)	27872152	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332719	2539505	2542123	276068	278599	SPCC736.14	SPAC18G6.15	dis1	mal3	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Matsuo Y (2016)	27872152	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332720	2539505	2542123	276068	278599	SPCC736.14	SPAC18G6.15	dis1	mal3	-	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Matsuo Y (2016)	27872152	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332721	2539505	2542123	276068	278599	SPCC736.14	SPAC18G6.15	dis1	mal3	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Matsuo Y (2016)	27872152	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332722	2539505	2542123	276068	278599	SPCC736.14	SPAC18G6.15	dis1	mal3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Matsuo Y (2016)	27872152	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332723	2541672	2540292	278168	276823	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC28F2.12	lsk1	rpb1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mbogning J (2015)	26275777	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification:undetermined	the effect of Lsk1 on H3K4me requires Rpb1 Ser2	-	BIOGRID
2332724	2540471	2540239	276999	276771	SPBC19F8.07	SPBC32H8.10	mcs6	cdk9	cdk7|crk1|mop1	SPACTOKYO_453.22	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Mbogning J (2015)	26275777	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	Combined inhibition of Mcs6as and Cdk9as decreased the levels of H3K36me3 more strongly than inhibition of either kinase individually	-	BIOGRID
2332725	2542652	2538951	279106	275525	SPAC1687.15	SPCC297.03	gsk3	ssp1	skp1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	deletion of spp1 increases sensitivity to caffeine	-	BIOGRID
2332728	2542652	2539845	279106	276393	SPAC1687.15	SPBC12C2.02c	gsk3	ste20	skp1	ste16	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chronological lifespan:partial rescue	cis-phenotypic co-supressing|double mutants show a longer chronological lifespan than either single mutant	-	BIOGRID
2332729	2542652	2539845	279106	276393	SPAC1687.15	SPBC12C2.02c	gsk3	ste20	skp1	ste16	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	double mutants show increased cell elongation phenotype|iso-phenotypic enhancing	-	BIOGRID
2332730	2542972	2542652	279411	279106	SPAPYUG7.02c	SPAC1687.15	sin1	gsk3	-	skp1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:partial rescue	deletion of gsk3 mutants decreases the cell elongation phenotype seen in sin1 mutants|iso-phenotypic suppressing	-	BIOGRID
2332734	2543629	2539087	280043	275659	SPAC3H5.06c	SPCC1259.13	pol1	chk1	polA|swi7	rad27	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Khan S (2015)	25822347	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation|viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2332735	2543629	2543580	280043	279995	SPAC3H5.06c	SPAC644.14c	pol1	rad51	polA|swi7	rhp51	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Khan S (2015)	25822347	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2332736	2543629	2541635	280043	278131	SPAC3H5.06c	SPAC1556.01c	pol1	rad50	polA|swi7	SPAP4C9.01c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Khan S (2015)	25822347	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2332737	2543629	2541620	280043	278117	SPAC3H5.06c	SPAC2G11.12	pol1	rqh1	polA|swi7	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Khan S (2015)	25822347	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2332738	2539676	2541696	276231	278192	SPBC1347.12	SPAC14C4.08	arp1	mug5	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Fujita I (2015)	25736293	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332739	2539676	2538878	276231	275457	SPBC1347.12	SPCC11E10.03	arp1	mug1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Fujita I (2015)	25736293	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332740	2542069	2541696	278546	278192	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC14C4.08	ssm4	mug5	SPAC637.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Fujita I (2015)	25736293	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332741	2542069	2538878	278546	275457	SPAC27D7.13c	SPCC11E10.03	ssm4	mug1	SPAC637.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Fujita I (2015)	25736293	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332742	2542069	2539676	278546	276231	SPAC27D7.13c	SPBC1347.12	ssm4	arp1	SPAC637.01c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Fujita I (2015)	25736293	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	in the presence of mug1 and mug5	-	BIOGRID
2332743	2542069	3361491	278546	280567	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC1805.08	ssm4	dlc1	SPAC637.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Fujita I (2015)	25736293	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332744	2542069	2541696	278546	278192	SPAC27D7.13c	SPAC14C4.08	ssm4	mug5	SPAC637.01c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Fujita I (2015)	25736293	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332745	2540712	5802757	277235	857895	SPBC216.02	SPBC646.17c	mcp5	dic1	mug21|num1	SPBC855.01c|SPBP35G2.01c|mug44	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Fujita I (2015)	25736293	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332746	2542544	2541585	279001	278082	SPAC18G6.10	SPAC14C4.05c	lem2	man1	heh1	heh2|mug61	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Barrales RR (2016)	26744419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	mono-phenotypic sub-suppressing	-	BIOGRID
2332747	2542544	2539185	279001	275756	SPAC18G6.10	SPCC737.03c	lem2	ima1	heh1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Barrales RR (2016)	26744419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	mono-phenotypic sub-suppressing	-	BIOGRID
2332748	2540236	2538859	276768	275439	SPBC336.09c	SPCC553.11c	rrn7	toa2	-	SPCC553.11c	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Montes M (2017)	28060464	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332749	2540236	2543627	276768	280041	SPBC336.09c	SPAC458.07	rrn7	tfa1	-	SPAPYUG7.01	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Montes M (2017)	28060464	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332750	2540236	2542339	276768	278805	SPBC336.09c	SPAC16E8.16	rrn7	sua7	-	SPAC16E8.16	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Montes M (2017)	28060464	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332751	2540236	2541582	276768	278079	SPBC336.09c	SPAC29E6.08	rrn7	tbp1	-	SPAC30.12|tbp|tdf1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Montes M (2017)	28060464	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332752	2540236	2543627	276768	280041	SPBC336.09c	SPAC458.07	rrn7	tfa1	-	SPAPYUG7.01	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Montes M (2017)	28060464	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332753	2540236	2542339	276768	278805	SPBC336.09c	SPAC16E8.16	rrn7	sua7	-	SPAC16E8.16	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Montes M (2017)	28060464	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332754	2540236	2541582	276768	278079	SPBC336.09c	SPAC29E6.08	rrn7	tbp1	-	SPAC30.12|tbp|tdf1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Montes M (2017)	28060464	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332755	2539659	2539047	276214	275620	SPBC146.13c	SPCC1223.06	myo1	tea1	-	alp8	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Makushok T (2016)	27180904	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape|protein/peptide distribution	cis-phenotypic enhancing|double mutants show increased defects in polarity	-	BIOGRID
2332756	2539260	2542744	275830	279194	SPCC285.11	SPAC1565.08	dsc5	cdc48	ucp10	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	Proximity Label-MS	physical	Hwang J (2016)	27274088	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332757	2540737	2541307	277260	277819	SPBC19G7.05c	SPBP22H7.03	bgs1	SPBP22H7.03	cps1|drc1	pi028|SPACTOKYO_453.06c|SPACTOKYO_453.07	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Sethi K (2016)	27749909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis:partial rescue|heat sensitivity:partial rescue|septum formation:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2332758	2541307	2540737	277819	277260	SPBP22H7.03	SPBC19G7.05c	SPBP22H7.03	bgs1	pi028|SPACTOKYO_453.06c|SPACTOKYO_453.07	cps1|drc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sethi K (2016)	27749909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332759	2541307	2540737	277819	277260	SPBP22H7.03	SPBC19G7.05c	SPBP22H7.03	bgs1	pi028|SPACTOKYO_453.06c|SPACTOKYO_453.07	cps1|drc1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sethi K (2016)	27749909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2332760	2541307	2542358	277819	278823	SPBP22H7.03	SPAC1782.09c	SPBP22H7.03	clp1	pi028|SPACTOKYO_453.06c|SPACTOKYO_453.07	flp1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sethi K (2016)	27749909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	double mutants show increased rates of cell death	-	BIOGRID
2332761	2541307	2540737	277819	277260	SPBP22H7.03	SPBC19G7.05c	SPBP22H7.03	bgs1	pi028|SPACTOKYO_453.06c|SPACTOKYO_453.07	cps1|drc1	Co-localization	physical	Sethi K (2016)	27749909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332762	2541307	2540737	277819	277260	SPBP22H7.03	SPBC19G7.05c	SPBP22H7.03	bgs1	pi028|SPACTOKYO_453.06c|SPACTOKYO_453.07	cps1|drc1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sethi K (2016)	27749909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2332763	2541307	2540635	277819	277161	SPBP22H7.03	SPBC23G7.08c	SPBP22H7.03	rga7	pi028|SPACTOKYO_453.06c|SPACTOKYO_453.07	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Sethi K (2016)	27749909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332764	2541307	2540112	277819	276649	SPBP22H7.03	SPBC11C11.02	SPBP22H7.03	imp2	pi028|SPACTOKYO_453.06c|SPACTOKYO_453.07	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Sethi K (2016)	27749909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332765	2541307	2541975	277819	278460	SPBP22H7.03	SPAC20G8.05c	SPBP22H7.03	cdc15	pi028|SPACTOKYO_453.06c|SPACTOKYO_453.07	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Sethi K (2016)	27749909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332766	2541307	2540856	277819	277373	SPBP22H7.03	SPBC4F6.12	SPBP22H7.03	pxl1	pi028|SPACTOKYO_453.06c|SPACTOKYO_453.07	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Sethi K (2016)	27749909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332767	2541307	2541307	277819	277819	SPBP22H7.03	SPBP22H7.03	SPBP22H7.03	SPBP22H7.03	pi028|SPACTOKYO_453.06c|SPACTOKYO_453.07	pi028|SPACTOKYO_453.06c|SPACTOKYO_453.07	Two-hybrid	physical	Sethi K (2016)	27749909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332768	2541307	2540635	277819	277161	SPBP22H7.03	SPBC23G7.08c	SPBP22H7.03	rga7	pi028|SPACTOKYO_453.06c|SPACTOKYO_453.07	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sethi K (2016)	27749909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2332769	2541307	2540856	277819	277373	SPBP22H7.03	SPBC4F6.12	SPBP22H7.03	pxl1	pi028|SPACTOKYO_453.06c|SPACTOKYO_453.07	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sethi K (2016)	27749909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2332770	2541307	2540112	277819	276649	SPBP22H7.03	SPBC11C11.02	SPBP22H7.03	imp2	pi028|SPACTOKYO_453.06c|SPACTOKYO_453.07	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sethi K (2016)	27749909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2332771	2541307	2540635	277819	277161	SPBP22H7.03	SPBC23G7.08c	SPBP22H7.03	rga7	pi028|SPACTOKYO_453.06c|SPACTOKYO_453.07	-	Co-localization	physical	Sethi K (2016)	27749909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332772	2541307	2540856	277819	277373	SPBP22H7.03	SPBC4F6.12	SPBP22H7.03	pxl1	pi028|SPACTOKYO_453.06c|SPACTOKYO_453.07	-	Co-localization	physical	Sethi K (2016)	27749909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332773	2542820	2539242	279267	275812	SPAC13G7.10	SPCC290.04	teb1	ams2	mug152|tay1	SPCC4F11.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Takayama Y (2016)	27901072	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332774	2539658	2539242	276213	275812	SPBC1105.17	SPCC290.04	cnp1	ams2	sim2	SPCC4F11.01	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Takayama Y (2016)	27901072	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2332775	2539242	2539242	275812	275812	SPCC290.04	SPCC290.04	ams2	ams2	SPCC4F11.01	SPCC4F11.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Takayama Y (2016)	27901072	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332776	2539242	2539242	275812	275812	SPCC290.04	SPCC290.04	ams2	ams2	SPCC4F11.01	SPCC4F11.01	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Takayama Y (2016)	27901072	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332777	2542544	2540281	279001	276812	SPAC18G6.10	SPBC2G2.14	lem2	csi1	heh1	SPBC2G2.14	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Barrales RR (2016)	26744419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	we found synthetic silencing defects in the csi/lem2 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
2332778	2542544	2540902	279001	277418	SPAC18G6.10	SPBC582.04c	lem2	dsh1	heh1	SPBC582.04c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Barrales RR (2016)	26744419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	we found synthetic silencing defects in the dsh1/lem2 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
2332779	2542544	2542313	279001	278779	SPAC18G6.10	SPAC16A10.07c	lem2	taz1	heh1	myb|myb1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Barrales RR (2016)	26744419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	we found synthetic silencing defects in the taz1/lem2 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
2332780	2542544	2539481	279001	276044	SPAC18G6.10	SPCC622.16c	lem2	epe1	heh1	kdm2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Barrales RR (2016)	26744419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	deleting epe1 completely suppresses the telomeric silencing defect of lem2 mutants	-	BIOGRID
2332781	2542544	2542170	279001	278645	SPAC18G6.10	SPAC17G8.13c	lem2	mst2	heh1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Barrales RR (2016)	26744419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	Partial suppression of the telomeric silencing defect is also seen in the absence of the MYST histone acetyltransferase Mst2	-	BIOGRID
2332782	2542544	2540821	279001	277339	SPAC18G6.10	SPBC800.03	lem2	clr3	heh1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Barrales RR (2016)	26744419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	the clr3/lem2 double mutant displays instead a synthetic increase of the cen-dg transcripts	-	BIOGRID
2332783	2539375	2539481	275941	276044	SPCC4G3.11	SPCC622.16c	mug154	epe1	-	kdm2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Barrales RR (2016)	26744419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	deleting epe1 suppresses the telomeric silencing defect of mug154 mutants	-	BIOGRID
2332803	2539930	2538906	276474	275483	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC1259.03	reb1	rpa12	SPBC660.01c	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Jaiswal R (2016)	27035982	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332804	2539930	2538906	276474	275483	SPBC1198.11c	SPCC1259.03	reb1	rpa12	SPBC660.01c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Jaiswal R (2016)	27035982	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332805	2542805	2540051	279253	276589	SPAC15A10.08	SPBC32H8.12c	ain1	act1	-	cps8|pi012	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Li Y (2016)	27075176	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332806	81	2540051	106596	276589	-	SPBC32H8.12c	ACTN4	act1	ACTININ-4|FSGS|FSGS1	cps8|pi012	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Li Y (2016)	27075176	9606	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332807	2540589	2540582	277115	277108	SPBC20F10.06	SPBC26H8.07c	mad2	nda3	-	alp12|ben1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Singh GK (2017)	27664031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332808	2543222	2540589	279650	277115	SPAC821.08c	SPBC20F10.06	slp1	mad2	cdc20	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Singh GK (2017)	27664031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332809	2539497	2539864	276060	276411	SPCC895.07	SPBC16A3.15c	alp14	nda2	mtc1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Hussmann F (2016)	26864000	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332810	2539497	2539497	276060	276060	SPCC895.07	SPCC895.07	alp14	alp14	mtc1	mtc1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Hussmann F (2016)	26864000	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332811	2539497	2543382	276060	279804	SPCC895.07	SPAC890.02c	alp14	alp7	mtc1	mia1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Hussmann F (2016)	26864000	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332812	2543382	2543382	279804	279804	SPAC890.02c	SPAC890.02c	alp7	alp7	mia1	mia1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Hussmann F (2016)	26864000	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332813	2539497	7846	276060	113603	SPCC895.07	-	alp14	TUBA1A	mtc1	B-ALPHA-1|LIS3|TUBA3	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Hussmann F (2016)	26864000	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332814	2539864	2540582	276411	277108	SPBC16A3.15c	SPBC26H8.07c	nda2	nda3	-	alp12|ben1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Hussmann F (2016)	26864000	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332815	2540936	2540582	277452	277108	SPBC800.05c	SPBC26H8.07c	atb2	nda3	alp2|ban5|tub1	alp12|ben1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Hussmann F (2016)	26864000	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332816	2541165	2543240	277680	279668	SPBC776.12c	SPAC694.06c	hsk1	mrc1	cdc7	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Matsumoto S (2017)	28069740	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	the mrc1-null(782-879) mutation rescues the growth of hsk1-89 cells at 30C	-	BIOGRID
2332818	2543240	2541165	279668	277680	SPAC694.06c	SPBC776.12c	mrc1	hsk1	-	cdc7	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Matsumoto S (2017)	28069740	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332819	2541165	2543240	277680	279668	SPBC776.12c	SPAC694.06c	hsk1	mrc1	cdc7	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Matsumoto S (2017)	28069740	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332820	2541869	2541869	278359	278359	SPAC22F3.13	SPAC22F3.13	tsc1	tsc1	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Sun W (2013)	23857276	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	dimer	-	BIOGRID
2332821	2541033	2542204	277548	278679	SPBC3B9.21	SPAC17A5.14	dcp1	exo2	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Wurm JP (2016)	27354705	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	NMR	-	BIOGRID
2332822	2541033	2540580	277548	277106	SPBC3B9.21	SPBC19C2.05	dcp1	ran1	-	pat1	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Wurm JP (2016)	27354705	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	NMR	-	BIOGRID
2332823	2541033	2541216	277548	277730	SPBC3B9.21	SPBC776.09	dcp1	ste13	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Wurm JP (2016)	27354705	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	NMR	-	BIOGRID
2332824	2541033	2542503	277548	278961	SPBC3B9.21	SPAC19A8.12	dcp1	dcp2	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Wurm JP (2016)	27354705	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	NMR	-	BIOGRID
2332825	2541033	2542536	277548	278993	SPBC3B9.21	SPAC18G6.09c	dcp1	SPAC18G6.09c	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Wurm JP (2016)	27354705	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	NMR	-	BIOGRID
2332826	2542503	2542536	278961	278993	SPAC19A8.12	SPAC18G6.09c	dcp2	SPAC18G6.09c	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Wurm JP (2016)	27354705	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	NMR	-	BIOGRID
2332827	2542503	2542536	278961	278993	SPAC19A8.12	SPAC18G6.09c	dcp2	SPAC18G6.09c	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Wurm JP (2016)	27354705	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332828	2541033	2542536	277548	278993	SPBC3B9.21	SPAC18G6.09c	dcp1	SPAC18G6.09c	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Wurm JP (2016)	27354705	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332829	2539817	2541319	276367	277831	SPBC146.03c	SPBP4H10.06c	cut3	cut14	smc4	smc2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Akai Y (2014)	25520186	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332830	2539540	2540458	276102	276986	SPCC736.12c	SPBC29A10.14	mmi1	rec8	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Folco HD (2017)	28199302	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	only the deletion of rec8, which encodes meiotic cohesin19, or crs1, a meiosis-specific cyclin gene20, suppressed TBZ sensitivity and resulted in stable propagation of a minichromosome in mmi1 null mutants	-	BIOGRID
2332831	2539540	2540450	276102	276978	SPCC736.12c	SPBC2G2.09c	mmi1	crs1	-	mug17	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Folco HD (2017)	28199302	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	only the deletion of rec8, which encodes meiotic cohesin19, or crs1, a meiosis-specific cyclin gene20, suppressed TBZ sensitivity and resulted in stable propagation of a minichromosome in mmi1 null mutants	-	BIOGRID
2332832	2538930	2540458	275506	276986	SPCC188.13c	SPBC29A10.14	dcr1	rec8	SPCC584.10c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Folco HD (2017)	28199302	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue	loss partially suppresses UPD in a dcr1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
2332833	2538930	2540450	275506	276978	SPCC188.13c	SPBC2G2.09c	dcr1	crs1	SPCC584.10c	mug17	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Folco HD (2017)	28199302	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue	loss partially suppresses UPD in a dcr1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
2332834	2539540	2542387	276102	278851	SPCC736.12c	SPAC17H9.20	mmi1	psc3	-	SPAC607.01	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Folco HD (2017)	28199302	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	mutation of psc3 partially rescues UPD in mmi1 null mutants	-	BIOGRID
2332835	2540458	2542788	276986	279237	SPBC29A10.14	SPAC15A10.15	rec8	sgo2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Folco HD (2017)	28199302	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	we observed increased UPD in rec8-OE cells lacking Sgo2	-	BIOGRID
2332836	2539630	2543584	276186	279999	SPBC106.19	SPAPB1E7.11c	SPBC106.19	SPAPB1E7.11c	SPBC582.01	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang Y (2017)	28334955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332837	2543584	2539630	279999	276186	SPAPB1E7.11c	SPBC106.19	SPAPB1E7.11c	SPBC106.19	-	SPBC582.01	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang Y (2017)	28334955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332838	2539630	2543584	276186	279999	SPBC106.19	SPAPB1E7.11c	SPBC106.19	SPAPB1E7.11c	SPBC582.01	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Wang Y (2017)	28334955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332839	2543584	2541875	279999	278365	SPAPB1E7.11c	SPAC22F3.06c	SPAPB1E7.11c	lon1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Wang Y (2017)	28334955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue	Ppr10 protein levels were restored nearly to the WT levels in the lon1/mpa1 double mutant compared to the mpa1 single mutant	-	BIOGRID
2332840	2539630	2540181	276186	276714	SPBC106.19	SPBC1271.15c	SPBC106.19	SPBC1271.15c	SPBC582.01	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang Y (2017)	28334955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332841	2539630	2540181	276186	276714	SPBC106.19	SPBC1271.15c	SPBC106.19	SPBC1271.15c	SPBC582.01	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Wang Y (2017)	28334955	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332847	2538762	2541045	275345	277560	SPCC306.04c	SPBC543.03c	set1	pku80	kmt2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Johansen P (2015)	26354768	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiotic recombination	mono-phenotypic enhancing	-	BIOGRID
2332848	2541672	2539523	278168	276085	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC622.09	lsk1	htb1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Materne P (2016)	27171419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type|resistance to chemicals:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2332849	2540511	2539723	277039	276276	SPBC1718.01	SPBC1347.01c	pop1	rev1	SPBC2G2.18|ste16	SPBC215.16c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Uchiyama M (2015)	26147350	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332850	2543514	2539723	279932	276276	SPAC4D7.03	SPBC1347.01c	pop2	rev1	sud1	SPBC215.16c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Uchiyama M (2015)	26147350	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332851	2539666	2539723	276221	276276	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC1347.01c	eso1	rev1	-	SPBC215.16c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Uchiyama M (2015)	26147350	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332852	2539723	2539666	276276	276221	SPBC1347.01c	SPBC16A3.11	rev1	eso1	SPBC215.16c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Uchiyama M (2015)	26147350	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332853	2539723	2540106	276276	276643	SPBC1347.01c	SPBC12D12.09	rev1	rev7	SPBC215.16c	SPAC12D12.09	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Uchiyama M (2015)	26147350	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332854	2540106	2539666	276643	276221	SPBC12D12.09	SPBC16A3.11	rev7	eso1	SPAC12D12.09	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Uchiyama M (2015)	26147350	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332855	2541071	2541045	277586	277560	SPBC582.05c	SPBC543.03c	brc1	pku80	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sanchez A (2015)	25965521	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|protein/peptide distribution|resistance to chemicals|viability	cis-phenotypic enhancing|double mutants show increased Rad52 foci formation	-	BIOGRID
2332856	2541071	2539090	277586	275662	SPBC582.05c	SPCC126.02c	brc1	pku70	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sanchez A (2015)	25965521	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|viability	cis-phenotypic enhancing	-	BIOGRID
2332859	2541071	2541620	277586	278117	SPBC582.05c	SPAC2G11.12	brc1	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sanchez A (2015)	25965521	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution	cis-phenotypic enhancing|double mutants show increased Rad52 foci formation	-	BIOGRID
2332860	2541045	2541620	277560	278117	SPBC543.03c	SPAC2G11.12	pku80	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sanchez A (2015)	25965521	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution	cis-phenotypic enhancing|double mutants show increased Rad52 foci formation	-	BIOGRID
2332861	2541071	2540348	277586	276877	SPBC582.05c	SPBC29A10.05	brc1	exo1	-	mut2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2015)	25965521	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	cis-phenotypic enhancing|elimination of Exo1 in brc1/pku80 mutant cells clearly impaired growth in the absence of genotoxins|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2332862	2541045	2540348	277560	276877	SPBC543.03c	SPBC29A10.05	pku80	exo1	-	mut2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2015)	25965521	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	cis-phenotypic enhancing|elimination of Exo1 in brc1/pku80 mutant cells clearly impaired growth in the absence of genotoxins|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2332863	2541045	2539004	277560	275578	SPBC543.03c	SPCC4G3.05c	pku80	mus81	-	slx3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2015)	25965521	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	cis-phenotypic enhancing|genetic complex|the triple mutant brc1/pku80/mus81 displayed a severe growth defect	-	BIOGRID
2332864	2541071	2541045	277586	277560	SPBC582.05c	SPBC543.03c	brc1	pku80	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2015)	25965521	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	cis-phenotypic enhancing|genetic complex|the triple mutant brc1/pku80/mus81 displayed a severe growth defect	-	BIOGRID
2332865	2541071	2539004	277586	275578	SPBC582.05c	SPCC4G3.05c	brc1	mus81	-	slx3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2015)	25965521	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	cis-phenotypic enhancing|genetic complex|the triple mutant brc1/pku80/mus81 displayed a severe growth defect	-	BIOGRID
2332868	2541071	3361323	277586	280399	SPBC582.05c	SPBC30D10.04	brc1	swi3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sanchez A (2015)	25965521	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	cis-phenotypic enhancing|double mutants show increased sensitivity to DNA damaging agents	-	BIOGRID
2332869	2541071	2540728	277586	277251	SPBC582.05c	SPBC216.06c	brc1	swi1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sanchez A (2015)	25965521	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	cis-phenotypic enhancing|double mutants show increased sensitivity to DNA damaging agents	-	BIOGRID
2332870	2543086	2540348	279519	276877	SPAC30D11.10	SPBC29A10.05	rad52	exo1	rad22|rad22A	mut2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ait Saada A (2017)	28475874	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue	deletion of exo1 reduces the number of terminally arrested forks caused by mutation of rad52	-	BIOGRID
2332876	2541587	2539020	278084	275593	SPAC14C4.02c	SPCC5E4.06	smc5	smc6	spr18	rad18	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Alt A (2017)	28134253	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332877	2541587	2539020	278084	275593	SPAC14C4.02c	SPCC5E4.06	smc5	smc6	spr18	rad18	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Alt A (2017)	28134253	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332878	2539164	2540719	275735	277242	SPCC16A11.17	SPBC216.05	mcm4	rad3	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ranatunga NS (2016)	27473316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2332879	2539164	2539087	275735	275659	SPCC16A11.17	SPCC1259.13	mcm4	chk1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	rad27	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ranatunga NS (2016)	27473316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2332880	2539164	2542144	275735	278620	SPCC16A11.17	SPAC6F6.17	mcm4	rif1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	SPAPJ736.01|tap1|tap11	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ranatunga NS (2016)	27473316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|viability:wild type	MMS sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
2332881	2540728	2542144	277251	278620	SPBC216.06c	SPAC6F6.17	swi1	rif1	-	SPAPJ736.01|tap1|tap11	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ranatunga NS (2016)	27473316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|viability:wild type	MMS sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
2332882	3361323	2542144	280399	278620	SPBC30D10.04	SPAC6F6.17	swi3	rif1	-	SPAPJ736.01|tap1|tap11	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ranatunga NS (2016)	27473316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|viability:wild type	MMS sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
2332883	2539164	2540728	275735	277251	SPCC16A11.17	SPBC216.06c	mcm4	swi1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ranatunga NS (2016)	27473316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2332884	2539164	3361323	275735	280399	SPCC16A11.17	SPBC30D10.04	mcm4	swi3	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ranatunga NS (2016)	27473316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2332885	2539164	2543240	275735	279668	SPCC16A11.17	SPAC694.06c	mcm4	mrc1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ranatunga NS (2016)	27473316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2332886	2539164	2543387	275735	279809	SPCC16A11.17	SPAPB1E7.02c	mcm4	mcl1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	slr3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ranatunga NS (2016)	27473316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2332889	2539164	2541165	275735	277680	SPCC16A11.17	SPBC776.12c	mcm4	hsk1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	cdc7	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ranatunga NS (2016)	27473316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2332890	2539164	2539399	275735	275964	SPCC16A11.17	SPCC550.13	mcm4	dfp1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	him1|rad35|dbf4	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ranatunga NS (2016)	27473316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2332891	2539164	2543118	275735	279550	SPCC16A11.17	SPAC3G6.11	mcm4	chl1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ranatunga NS (2016)	27473316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
2332892	2539164	2540255	275735	276786	SPCC16A11.17	SPBC336.04	mcm4	cdc6	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	mis10|pol3|pold	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ranatunga NS (2016)	27473316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2332893	2539164	2538720	275735	275304	SPCC16A11.17	SPCC338.05c	mcm4	mms2	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	spm2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ranatunga NS (2016)	27473316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
2332894	2539164	2542925	275735	279366	SPCC16A11.17	SPAC11E3.04c	mcm4	ubc13	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	spu13|sst5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ranatunga NS (2016)	27473316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
2332895	2539164	2540020	275735	276564	SPCC16A11.17	SPBC16D10.09	mcm4	pcn1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	pcn	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ranatunga NS (2016)	27473316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
2332896	2539164	3361391	275735	280467	SPCC16A11.17	SPAC13G6.01c	mcm4	rad8	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	SPAC5H10.14c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ranatunga NS (2016)	27473316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
2332897	2539164	2543358	275735	279780	SPCC16A11.17	SPAC688.10	mcm4	rev3	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ranatunga NS (2016)	27473316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
2332898	2539164	2539723	275735	276276	SPCC16A11.17	SPBC1347.01c	mcm4	rev1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	SPBC215.16c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ranatunga NS (2016)	27473316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
2332899	2539164	2539547	275735	276108	SPCC16A11.17	SPCC553.07c	mcm4	kpa1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	mug40|pol(kappa)|pol-kappa	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ranatunga NS (2016)	27473316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
2332900	2539164	2539666	275735	276221	SPCC16A11.17	SPBC16A3.11	mcm4	eso1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ranatunga NS (2016)	27473316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
2332901	2539164	2541635	275735	278131	SPCC16A11.17	SPAC1556.01c	mcm4	rad50	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	SPAP4C9.01c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ranatunga NS (2016)	27473316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2332902	2539164	2539004	275735	275578	SPCC16A11.17	SPCC4G3.05c	mcm4	mus81	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	slx3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ranatunga NS (2016)	27473316	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2332904	2542313	2542313	278779	278779	SPAC16A10.07c	SPAC16A10.07c	taz1	taz1	myb|myb1	myb|myb1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Pan L (2015)	26063574	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332905	2540115	2542244	276652	278714	SPBC1778.02	SPAC19G12.13c	rap1	poz1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Pan L (2015)	26063574	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332906	2539580	2539042	276139	275615	SPCC645.07	SPCC1183.05c	rgf1	lig4	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Manjon E (2017)	28334931	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	double mutants show a slightly higher tolerance to Phl compared to rgf1 single mutants	-	BIOGRID
2332907	2539580	2541158	276139	277673	SPCC645.07	SPBC660.13c	rgf1	ssb1	-	rad11|rpa1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Manjon E (2017)	28334931	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	double mutants show increased senstivity to Phl	-	BIOGRID
2332908	2539580	2543580	276139	279995	SPCC645.07	SPAC644.14c	rgf1	rad51	-	rhp51	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Manjon E (2017)	28334931	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	double mutants show increased senstivity to Phl	-	BIOGRID
2332909	2539580	2543086	276139	279519	SPCC645.07	SPAC30D11.10	rgf1	rad52	-	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Manjon E (2017)	28334931	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	double mutants show increased senstivity to Phl	-	BIOGRID
2332910	2539580	2542749	276139	279199	SPCC645.07	SPAC15A10.03c	rgf1	rad54	-	rhp54	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Manjon E (2017)	28334931	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	double mutants show increased senstivity to Phl	-	BIOGRID
2332922	2540115	2542244	276652	278714	SPBC1778.02	SPAC19G12.13c	rap1	poz1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332923	2540115	2542414	276652	278878	SPBC1778.02	SPAC6F6.16c	rap1	tpz1	-	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332924	2540115	2542703	276652	279156	SPBC1778.02	SPAC26H5.06	rap1	pot1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332925	2540115	2539352	276652	275918	SPBC1778.02	SPCC188.07	rap1	ccq1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332926	2540115	2542313	276652	278779	SPBC1778.02	SPAC16A10.07c	rap1	taz1	-	myb|myb1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332927	2540115	2540825	276652	277343	SPBC1778.02	SPBC428.08c	rap1	clr4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332928	2540115	2543116	276652	279548	SPBC1778.02	SPAC3A11.08	rap1	pcu4	-	Cul-4|cul4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332929	2540115	2539050	276652	275623	SPBC1778.02	SPCC11E10.08	rap1	rik1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332930	2542244	2540115	278714	276652	SPAC19G12.13c	SPBC1778.02	poz1	rap1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332931	2542244	2542414	278714	278878	SPAC19G12.13c	SPAC6F6.16c	poz1	tpz1	-	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332932	2542244	2542703	278714	279156	SPAC19G12.13c	SPAC26H5.06	poz1	pot1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332933	2542244	2539352	278714	275918	SPAC19G12.13c	SPCC188.07	poz1	ccq1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332934	2542244	2542313	278714	278779	SPAC19G12.13c	SPAC16A10.07c	poz1	taz1	-	myb|myb1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332935	2542244	2540825	278714	277343	SPAC19G12.13c	SPBC428.08c	poz1	clr4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332936	2542244	2543116	278714	279548	SPAC19G12.13c	SPAC3A11.08	poz1	pcu4	-	Cul-4|cul4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332937	2542244	2539050	278714	275623	SPAC19G12.13c	SPCC11E10.08	poz1	rik1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332938	2542244	2538848	278714	275429	SPAC19G12.13c	SPCC613.12c	poz1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332939	2542244	2539420	278714	275985	SPAC19G12.13c	SPCC970.07c	poz1	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332940	2540825	2540115	277343	276652	SPBC428.08c	SPBC1778.02	clr4	rap1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332941	2540825	2542414	277343	278878	SPBC428.08c	SPAC6F6.16c	clr4	tpz1	-	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332942	2540825	2542703	277343	279156	SPBC428.08c	SPAC26H5.06	clr4	pot1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332943	2540825	2539352	277343	275918	SPBC428.08c	SPCC188.07	clr4	ccq1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332944	2540825	2542244	277343	278714	SPBC428.08c	SPAC19G12.13c	clr4	poz1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332945	2540825	2543116	277343	279548	SPBC428.08c	SPAC3A11.08	clr4	pcu4	-	Cul-4|cul4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332946	2540825	2539050	277343	275623	SPBC428.08c	SPCC11E10.08	clr4	rik1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332947	2540825	2538848	277343	275429	SPBC428.08c	SPCC613.12c	clr4	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332948	2540825	2539420	277343	275985	SPBC428.08c	SPCC970.07c	clr4	raf2	-	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332949	2540825	2542244	277343	278714	SPBC428.08c	SPAC19G12.13c	clr4	poz1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332950	2540825	2542703	277343	279156	SPBC428.08c	SPAC26H5.06	clr4	pot1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332951	2540825	2542414	277343	278878	SPBC428.08c	SPAC6F6.16c	clr4	tpz1	-	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332952	2540825	2539352	277343	275918	SPBC428.08c	SPCC188.07	clr4	ccq1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332953	2539050	2539352	275623	275918	SPCC11E10.08	SPCC188.07	rik1	ccq1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332954	2539420	2539352	275985	275918	SPCC970.07c	SPCC188.07	raf2	ccq1	clr7|cmc2|dos2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332955	2542244	2540821	278714	277339	SPAC19G12.13c	SPBC800.03	poz1	clr3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332956	2540115	2540821	276652	277339	SPBC1778.02	SPBC800.03	rap1	clr3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332957	2540825	2540821	277343	277339	SPBC428.08c	SPBC800.03	clr4	clr3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332958	2542414	2542244	278878	278714	SPAC6F6.16c	SPAC19G12.13c	tpz1	poz1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332959	2540115	2542244	276652	278714	SPBC1778.02	SPAC19G12.13c	rap1	poz1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332960	2540825	2540115	277343	276652	SPBC428.08c	SPBC1778.02	clr4	rap1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332961	2542244	2542170	278714	278645	SPAC19G12.13c	SPAC17G8.13c	poz1	mst2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2332962	2542414	2542170	278878	278645	SPAC6F6.16c	SPAC17G8.13c	tpz1	mst2	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2332963	2542244	2540077	278714	276615	SPAC19G12.13c	SPBC17D11.04c	poz1	nto1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2332964	2542244	2539706	278714	276259	SPAC19G12.13c	SPBC16G5.13	poz1	ptf2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2332965	2542244	2539481	278714	276044	SPAC19G12.13c	SPCC622.16c	poz1	epe1	-	kdm2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2332966	2542244	2541633	278714	278129	SPAC19G12.13c	SPAC664.01c	poz1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2332967	2539481	2540825	276044	277343	SPCC622.16c	SPBC428.08c	epe1	clr4	kdm2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	introducing a clr4-W31G mutation, which abolishes heterochromatin spreading from nucleation centers, resulted in loss of silencing at TEL::ura4+ in mst2/poz1 or epe1/poz1 double mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
2332968	2542170	2540825	278645	277343	SPAC17G8.13c	SPBC428.08c	mst2	clr4	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Wang J (2016)	26988418	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	introducing a clr4-W31G mutation, which abolishes heterochromatin spreading from nucleation centers, resulted in loss of silencing at TEL::ura4+ in mst2/poz1 or epe1/poz1 double mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
2332969	2541027	2538760	277542	275343	SPBC409.16c	SPCC970.01	saw1	rad16	SPBC409.16c	rad10|rad20|swi9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang H (2015)	25777942	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332970	2541027	2540887	277542	277404	SPBC409.16c	SPBC4F6.15c	saw1	swi10	SPBC409.16c	rad23	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang H (2015)	25777942	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332971	2538760	2541027	275343	277542	SPCC970.01	SPBC409.16c	rad16	saw1	rad10|rad20|swi9	SPBC409.16c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang H (2015)	25777942	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332972	2540887	2541027	277404	277542	SPBC4F6.15c	SPBC409.16c	swi10	saw1	rad23	SPBC409.16c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang H (2015)	25777942	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332973	2541027	2538760	277542	275343	SPBC409.16c	SPCC970.01	saw1	rad16	SPBC409.16c	rad10|rad20|swi9	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Wang H (2015)	25777942	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332974	2541027	2540887	277542	277404	SPBC409.16c	SPBC4F6.15c	saw1	swi10	SPBC409.16c	rad23	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Wang H (2015)	25777942	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332975	2541027	2538760	277542	275343	SPBC409.16c	SPCC970.01	saw1	rad16	SPBC409.16c	rad10|rad20|swi9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang H (2015)	25777942	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332976	2541027	2540887	277542	277404	SPBC409.16c	SPBC4F6.15c	saw1	swi10	SPBC409.16c	rad23	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang H (2015)	25777942	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332977	2541027	2539073	277542	275645	SPBC409.16c	SPCC1322.02	saw1	pxd1	SPBC409.16c	SPCC1322.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wang H (2015)	25777942	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332978	2540887	2539073	277404	275645	SPBC4F6.15c	SPCC1322.02	swi10	pxd1	rad23	SPCC1322.02	Two-hybrid	physical	Wang H (2015)	25777942	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332979	2539073	2538760	275645	275343	SPCC1322.02	SPCC970.01	pxd1	rad16	SPCC1322.02	rad10|rad20|swi9	Two-hybrid	physical	Wang H (2015)	25777942	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332980	2540887	2539073	277404	275645	SPBC4F6.15c	SPCC1322.02	swi10	pxd1	rad23	SPCC1322.02	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang H (2015)	25777942	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332981	2538760	2539073	275343	275645	SPCC970.01	SPCC1322.02	rad16	pxd1	rad10|rad20|swi9	SPCC1322.02	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang H (2015)	25777942	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332982	2541027	2539073	277542	275645	SPBC409.16c	SPCC1322.02	saw1	pxd1	SPBC409.16c	SPCC1322.02	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang H (2015)	25777942	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332983	2539073	2540887	275645	277404	SPCC1322.02	SPBC4F6.15c	pxd1	swi10	SPCC1322.02	rad23	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang H (2015)	25777942	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332984	2539073	2538760	275645	275343	SPCC1322.02	SPCC970.01	pxd1	rad16	SPCC1322.02	rad10|rad20|swi9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang H (2015)	25777942	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332985	2539073	2541027	275645	277542	SPCC1322.02	SPBC409.16c	pxd1	saw1	SPCC1322.02	SPBC409.16c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang H (2015)	25777942	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332986	2539073	2540887	275645	277404	SPCC1322.02	SPBC4F6.15c	pxd1	swi10	SPCC1322.02	rad23	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Wang H (2015)	25777942	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332987	2539073	2538760	275645	275343	SPCC1322.02	SPCC970.01	pxd1	rad16	SPCC1322.02	rad10|rad20|swi9	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Wang H (2015)	25777942	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332988	2539073	2541027	275645	277542	SPCC1322.02	SPBC409.16c	pxd1	saw1	SPCC1322.02	SPBC409.16c	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Wang H (2015)	25777942	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332989	2541942	2541505	278429	278007	SPAC222.09	SPAC57A7.04c	seb1	pabp	-	pab1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wittmann S (2017)	28367989	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332990	2541942	2541600	278429	278097	SPAC222.09	SPAC6F12.17	seb1	rna14	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wittmann S (2017)	28367989	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332991	2541942	2539694	278429	276248	SPAC222.09	SPBC1709.08	seb1	cft1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wittmann S (2017)	28367989	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332992	2541942	2539954	278429	276498	SPAC222.09	SPBC1709.15c	seb1	cft2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wittmann S (2017)	28367989	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332993	2541942	2542258	278429	278727	SPAC222.09	SPAC17G6.16c	seb1	ysh1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wittmann S (2017)	28367989	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332994	2541942	2543538	278429	279955	SPAC222.09	SPAC1071.01c	seb1	pta1	-	SPAC4H3.15c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wittmann S (2017)	28367989	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332995	2541942	2543089	278429	279522	SPAC222.09	SPAC12G12.14c	seb1	pfs2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wittmann S (2017)	28367989	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332996	2541942	2541506	278429	278008	SPAC222.09	SPAC227.08c	seb1	yth1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wittmann S (2017)	28367989	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332997	2541942	2541557	278429	278056	SPAC222.09	SPAC1F7.07c	seb1	fip1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wittmann S (2017)	28367989	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332998	2541942	2540220	278429	276753	SPAC222.09	SPBC337.03	seb1	rhn1	-	SPBC337.03|iss4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Wittmann S (2017)	28367989	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2332999	2541942	2540292	278429	276823	SPAC222.09	SPBC28F2.12	seb1	rpb1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Wittmann S (2017)	28367989	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333000	2541942	2540292	278429	276823	SPAC222.09	SPBC28F2.12	seb1	rpb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wittmann S (2017)	28367989	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333001	2541942	2542674	278429	279127	SPAC222.09	SPAC26A3.12c	seb1	dhp1	-	rat1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wittmann S (2017)	28367989	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2333002	2541942	2543089	278429	279522	SPAC222.09	SPAC12G12.14c	seb1	pfs2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wittmann S (2017)	28367989	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2333004	2539205	2539205	275775	275775	SPCC4B3.15	SPCC4B3.15	mid1	mid1	dmf1	dmf1	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Sun L (2015)	25959226	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	homodimerization	-	BIOGRID
2333005	2539483	2540241	276046	276773	SPCC584.02	SPBC32H8.11	cuf2	mei4	-	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ioannoni R (2016)	26986212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333006	2539483	2540241	276046	276773	SPCC584.02	SPBC32H8.11	cuf2	mei4	-	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	PCA	physical	Ioannoni R (2016)	26986212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	BiFC	-	BIOGRID
2333007	2539483	2540241	276046	276773	SPCC584.02	SPBC32H8.11	cuf2	mei4	-	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ioannoni R (2016)	26986212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	deletion of mei4 inhibits the regulation of genes by cuf2	-	BIOGRID
2333008	2539773	2539651	276324	276206	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC12D12.06	med7	srb11	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Banyai G (2017)	28515143	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333009	2539773	2541925	276324	278413	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC5D6.05	med7	med18	-	sep11|pmc6	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Banyai G (2017)	28515143	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333010	2539773	2542141	276324	278617	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC17C9.05c	med7	pmc3	-	med27|prk1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Banyai G (2017)	28515143	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333011	2539773	2541900	276324	278390	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC23H4.17c	med7	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Banyai G (2017)	28515143	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333012	2539773	2540294	276324	276825	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC31F10.04c	med7	srb4	-	med17	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Banyai G (2017)	28515143	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333013	2539773	2543467	276324	279887	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC688.08	med7	srb8	-	med12	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Banyai G (2017)	28515143	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333014	2539773	2542571	276324	279027	SPBC14F5.08	SPAC589.02c	med7	med13	-	spTrap240|srb9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Banyai G (2017)	28515143	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333015	2539773	2540292	276324	276823	SPBC14F5.08	SPBC28F2.12	med7	rpb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Banyai G (2017)	28515143	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333016	2539651	2541925	276206	278413	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC5D6.05	srb11	med18	-	sep11|pmc6	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Banyai G (2017)	28515143	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333017	2539651	2542141	276206	278617	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC17C9.05c	srb11	pmc3	-	med27|prk1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Banyai G (2017)	28515143	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333018	2539651	2541900	276206	278390	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC23H4.17c	srb11	srb10	-	cdk8|prk1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Banyai G (2017)	28515143	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333019	2539651	2540294	276206	276825	SPBC12D12.06	SPBC31F10.04c	srb11	srb4	-	med17	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Banyai G (2017)	28515143	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333020	2539651	2543467	276206	279887	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC688.08	srb11	srb8	-	med12	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Banyai G (2017)	28515143	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333021	2539651	2542571	276206	279027	SPBC12D12.06	SPAC589.02c	srb11	med13	-	spTrap240|srb9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Banyai G (2017)	28515143	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333023	2540471	2540292	276999	276823	SPBC19F8.07	SPBC28F2.12	mcs6	rpb1	cdk7|crk1|mop1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Devos M (2015)	25691663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333024	2540471	2539869	276999	276415	SPBC19F8.07	SPBC11B10.09	mcs6	cdc2	cdk7|crk1|mop1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Devos M (2015)	25691663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333025	2540239	2540292	276771	276823	SPBC32H8.10	SPBC28F2.12	cdk9	rpb1	SPACTOKYO_453.22	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Devos M (2015)	25691663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333026	2543327	1017	279750	107452	SPAC1D4.06c	-	csk1	CDK2	-	CDKN2|p33(CDK2)	Biochemical Activity	physical	Devos M (2015)	25691663	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333028	850515	2539869	31117	276415	YFL029C	SPBC11B10.09	CAK1	cdc2	CIV1|cyclin-dependent protein kinase-activating kinase CAK1|L000003177	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Devos M (2015)	25691663	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333029	850515	2539869	31117	276415	YFL029C	SPBC11B10.09	CAK1	cdc2	CIV1|cyclin-dependent protein kinase-activating kinase CAK1|L000003177	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Devos M (2015)	25691663	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333030	2539244	2540060	275814	276598	SPCC1672.06c	SPBC106.01	asp1	mph1	vip1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Topolski B (2016)	27697865	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:wild type	we found that the prolonged mitotic delay seen for asp1D333A cells was abolished in asp1D333A/mph1-null mitotic cells	-	BIOGRID
2333031	2539244	2540589	275814	277115	SPCC1672.06c	SPBC20F10.06	asp1	mad2	vip1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Topolski B (2016)	27697865	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	double mutants show reduced growth	-	BIOGRID
2333032	2542732	2539244	279182	275814	SPAC25G10.07c	SPCC1672.06c	cut7	asp1	-	vip1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Topolski B (2016)	27697865	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2333033	2540825	2542467	277343	278928	SPBC428.08c	SPAC1834.04	clr4	hht1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Shan CM (2016)	27648579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Methylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333034	2542467	2540825	278928	277343	SPAC1834.04	SPBC428.08c	hht1	clr4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Shan CM (2016)	27648579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333035	2542467	10919	278928	116123	SPAC1834.04	DAAP-66K18.3	hht1	EHMT2	-	BAT8|C6orf30|G9A|GAT8|KMT1C|NG36	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Shan CM (2016)	27648579	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333036	2542467	10919	278928	116123	SPAC1834.04	DAAP-66K18.3	hht1	EHMT2	-	BAT8|C6orf30|G9A|GAT8|KMT1C|NG36	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Shan CM (2016)	27648579	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333037	2539804	2540825	276354	277343	SPBC1105.11c	SPBC428.08c	hht3	clr4	h3.3	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Shan CM (2016)	27648579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	overexpression of clr4 can rescue the silencing defects caused by expressing a clr4-trapping histone 3 mutant	-	BIOGRID
2333041	2542150	2539467	278626	276030	SPAC17A5.11	SPCC417.07c	rec12	mto1	spo11	mbo1|mod20	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Katsumata K (2016)	27611693	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:partial rescue	double mutants show increased equational chromatid segregation	-	BIOGRID
2333042	2542150	2541973	278626	278458	SPAC17A5.11	SPAC6G9.13c	rec12	bqt1	spo11	mug23|rec26	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Katsumata K (2016)	27611693	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:partial rescue	double mutants show increased equational chromatid segregation	-	BIOGRID
2333043	2542150	2541326	278626	277838	SPAC17A5.11	SPBP35G2.03c	rec12	sgo1	spo11	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Katsumata K (2016)	27611693	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:partial rescue	double mutants show increased equational chromatid segregation	-	BIOGRID
2333052	2539027	155807	275600	1205540	SPCC1322.08	HIV1gp4	srk1	vpr	mkp1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Huard S (2008)	18160429	284812	11676	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333054	2539481	2540825	276044	277343	SPCC622.16c	SPBC428.08c	epe1	clr4	kdm2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Garcia JF (2015)	25957277	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	the growth in the boundary reporter strain lacking both the B-boxes and Epe1 is fully restored when clr4+ is deleted	-	BIOGRID
2333058	2540720	2541552	277243	278051	SPBC216.07c	SPAC1142.08	tor2	fhl1	SPBC646.01c	SPAC8C9.01	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Pataki E (2017)	27165118	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|sporulation:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Expression of fhl1+ from a strong promoter rescues rapamycin and temperature sensitivity of tor2-ts mutant cells|Expression of fhl1+ from a strong promoter suppressed the hyper-sporulation defect of tor2-ts10 cells	-	BIOGRID
2333072	2539219	2541856	275789	278347	SPCC1795.01c	SPAC23H3.08c	mad3	bub3	SPCC895.02	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sewart K (2017)	28366743	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333073	2541856	2539219	278347	275789	SPAC23H3.08c	SPCC1795.01c	bub3	mad3	-	SPCC895.02	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sewart K (2017)	28366743	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333074	2543222	2543222	279650	279650	SPAC821.08c	SPAC821.08c	slp1	slp1	cdc20	cdc20	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sewart K (2017)	28366743	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333075	2543222	2540589	279650	277115	SPAC821.08c	SPBC20F10.06	slp1	mad2	cdc20	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sewart K (2017)	28366743	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333076	2543222	2539219	279650	275789	SPAC821.08c	SPCC1795.01c	slp1	mad3	cdc20	SPCC895.02	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sewart K (2017)	28366743	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333077	2539219	2543222	275789	279650	SPCC1795.01c	SPAC821.08c	mad3	slp1	SPCC895.02	cdc20	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sewart K (2017)	28366743	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2333078	2539219	2543222	275789	279650	SPCC1795.01c	SPAC821.08c	mad3	slp1	SPCC895.02	cdc20	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sewart K (2017)	28366743	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333079	2539219	2540589	275789	277115	SPCC1795.01c	SPBC20F10.06	mad3	mad2	SPCC895.02	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sewart K (2017)	28366743	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333080	2539219	2542615	275789	279069	SPCC1795.01c	SPAC19G12.01c	mad3	cut20	SPCC895.02	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sewart K (2017)	28366743	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333081	2541592	2543222	278089	279650	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC821.08c	cut9	slp1	dre1	cdc20	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sewart K (2017)	28366743	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333082	2541592	2540589	278089	277115	SPAC6F12.15c	SPBC20F10.06	cut9	mad2	dre1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sewart K (2017)	28366743	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333083	2541592	2539219	278089	275789	SPAC6F12.15c	SPCC1795.01c	cut9	mad3	dre1	SPCC895.02	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sewart K (2017)	28366743	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333084	2539285	2540013	275853	276557	SPCC1672.02c	SPBC14C8.07c	sap1	cdc18	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Guan L (2017)	28223353	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333085	2540013	2539285	276557	275853	SPBC14C8.07c	SPCC1672.02c	cdc18	sap1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Guan L (2017)	28223353	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333086	2538959	2539164	275533	275735	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC16A11.17	cds1	mcm4	-	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sabatinos SA (2012)	23045396	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue	We compared RPA accumulation in cds1 mutant cells to that in cds1/mcm4ts-dg double mutants and observed a significant reduction of RPA at restrictive temperature compared to single mutant	-	BIOGRID
2333087	2538959	2541165	275533	277680	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC776.12c	cds1	hsk1	-	cdc7	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sabatinos SA (2012)	23045396	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	hsk1ts partly rescued the viability of cds1 mutant cells in HU	-	BIOGRID
2333090	2542732	2542655	279182	279109	SPAC25G10.07c	SPAC3A11.14c	cut7	pkl1	-	SPAC3H5.03c|klp1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Olmsted ZT (2014)	25348260	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2333091	2542732	2542655	279182	279109	SPAC25G10.07c	SPAC3A11.14c	cut7	pkl1	-	SPAC3H5.03c|klp1	Co-fractionation	physical	Olmsted ZT (2014)	25348260	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333092	2542732	2540223	279182	276756	SPAC25G10.07c	SPBC32F12.04	cut7	gtb1	-	tug1	Co-fractionation	physical	Olmsted ZT (2014)	25348260	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333093	2542732	2540392	279182	276920	SPAC25G10.07c	SPBC365.15	cut7	alp4	-	-	Co-fractionation	physical	Olmsted ZT (2014)	25348260	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333094	2542655	2542732	279109	279182	SPAC3A11.14c	SPAC25G10.07c	pkl1	cut7	SPAC3H5.03c|klp1	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Olmsted ZT (2014)	25348260	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333095	2542655	2540223	279109	276756	SPAC3A11.14c	SPBC32F12.04	pkl1	gtb1	SPAC3H5.03c|klp1	tug1	Protein-peptide	physical	Olmsted ZT (2014)	25348260	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333096	2542655	2540392	279109	276920	SPAC3A11.14c	SPBC365.15	pkl1	alp4	SPAC3H5.03c|klp1	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Olmsted ZT (2014)	25348260	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333097	2542655	2542732	279109	279182	SPAC3A11.14c	SPAC25G10.07c	pkl1	cut7	SPAC3H5.03c|klp1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Olmsted ZT (2014)	25348260	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	-	-	BIOGRID
2333100	2542226	2539523	278699	276085	SPAC19G12.06c	SPCC622.09	hta2	htb1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Koyama M (2017)	27890612	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333101	2539804	2542463	276354	278924	SPBC1105.11c	SPAC1834.03c	hht3	hhf1	h3.3	h4.1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Koyama M (2017)	27890612	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333106	2540131	2540720	276668	277243	SPBC1778.05c	SPBC216.07c	SPBC1778.05c	tor2	-	SPBC646.01c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ma N (2016)	27227887	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	The tor2-287 mutation rescued the growth defect of lam2, gtr1 and gtr2 mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
2333107	2540954	2540720	277470	277243	SPBC337.13c	SPBC216.07c	gtr1	tor2	-	SPBC646.01c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ma N (2016)	27227887	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	The tor2-287 mutation rescued the growth defect of lam2, gtr1 and gtr2 mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
2333108	2539088	2540720	275660	277243	SPCC777.05	SPBC216.07c	gtr2	tor2	-	SPBC646.01c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ma N (2016)	27227887	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	The tor2-287 mutation rescued the growth defect of lam2, gtr1 and gtr2 mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
2333109	2541073	2540720	277588	277243	SPBC543.04	SPBC216.07c	SPBC543.04	tor2	-	SPBC646.01c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ma N (2016)	27227887	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	The tor2-287 mutation rescued the growth defect of npr3 and npr2 mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
2333110	2541840	2540720	278331	277243	SPAC23H3.03c	SPBC216.07c	npr2	tor2	-	SPBC646.01c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ma N (2016)	27227887	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	The tor2-287 mutation rescued the growth defect of npr3 and npr2 mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
2333111	2540131	2541840	276668	278331	SPBC1778.05c	SPAC23H3.03c	SPBC1778.05c	npr2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ma N (2016)	27227887	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333112	2540131	2540954	276668	277470	SPBC1778.05c	SPBC337.13c	SPBC1778.05c	gtr1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ma N (2016)	27227887	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333113	2541840	2540131	278331	276668	SPAC23H3.03c	SPBC1778.05c	npr2	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ma N (2016)	27227887	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333114	2541840	2540954	278331	277470	SPAC23H3.03c	SPBC337.13c	npr2	gtr1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ma N (2016)	27227887	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333118	2538763	2538763	275346	275346	SPCC970.12	SPCC970.12	mis18	mis18	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Subramanian L (2016)	26921242	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	dimer	-	BIOGRID
2333120	2539481	2539109	276044	275681	SPCC622.16c	SPCC74.03c	epe1	ssp2	kdm2	ucp9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen Y (2017)	28600551	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333488	2542070	2539804	278547	276354	SPAC29B12.02c	SPBC1105.11c	set2	hht3	kmt3	h3.3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yadav RK (2017)	28718400	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Additive growth defects were seen for set2/H3-G34R double mutants on CPT and MMS	-	BIOGRID
2333489	2540470	2541071	276998	277586	SPBC29A10.15	SPBC582.05c	orc1	brc1	cdc30|orp1|rid1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yadav RK (2017)	28718400	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2333490	2539804	2539020	276354	275593	SPBC1105.11c	SPCC5E4.06	hht3	smc6	h3.3	rad18	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yadav RK (2017)	28718400	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show synergistic sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
2333491	2539804	2542925	276354	279366	SPBC1105.11c	SPAC11E3.04c	hht3	ubc13	h3.3	spu13|sst5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yadav RK (2017)	28718400	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show synergistic sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
2333492	2539804	2539090	276354	275662	SPBC1105.11c	SPCC126.02c	hht3	pku70	h3.3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yadav RK (2017)	28718400	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show synergistic sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
2333506	2540006	2539423	276550	275988	SPBC1711.17	SPCC663.12	prp16	cid12	SPBC17G9.01	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mutazono M (2017)	28231281	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333510	2541940	2540051	278427	276589	SPAC27F1.02c	SPBC32H8.12c	cdc8	act1	fus4	cps8|pi012	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Brooker HR (2016)	27501521	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333511	2540329	2542299	276859	278766	SPBC29B5.01	SPAC18B11.10	atf1	tup11	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Asada R (2015)	25535331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type	deletion of tup11/12 restores target gene fbp1 expression in the mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2333512	2540329	2543402	276859	279824	SPBC29B5.01	SPAC630.14c	atf1	tup12	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Asada R (2015)	25535331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type	deletion of tup11/12 restores target gene fbp1 expression in the mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2333513	2543031	2542299	279467	278766	SPAC6F12.02	SPAC18B11.10	rst2	tup11	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Asada R (2015)	25535331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type	deletion of tup11/12 restores target gene fbp1 expression in the mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2333514	2543031	2543402	279467	279824	SPAC6F12.02	SPAC630.14c	rst2	tup12	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Asada R (2015)	25535331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type	deletion of tup11/12 restores target gene fbp1 expression in the mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2333515	2540133	2542299	276670	278766	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC18B11.10	php5	tup11	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Asada R (2015)	25535331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type	deletion of tup11/12 restores target gene fbp1 expression in the mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2333516	2540133	2543402	276670	279824	SPBC3B8.02	SPAC630.14c	php5	tup12	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Asada R (2015)	25535331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type	deletion of tup11/12 restores target gene fbp1 expression in the mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2333517	2542635	2539487	279089	276050	SPAC24H6.09	SPCC895.05	gef1	for3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Wei B (2016)	26941334	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation	-	-	BIOGRID
2333575	2540473	2539845	277001	276393	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC12C2.02c	tor1	ste20	-	ste16	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tatebe H (2017)	28264193	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333576	2540645	2540473	277170	277001	SPBC21B10.05c	SPBC30D10.10c	pop3	tor1	wat1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tatebe H (2017)	28264193	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333577	2540473	2540645	277001	277170	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC21B10.05c	tor1	pop3	-	wat1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tatebe H (2017)	28264193	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333578	2539845	2540473	276393	277001	SPBC12C2.02c	SPBC30D10.10c	ste20	tor1	ste16	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tatebe H (2017)	28264193	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333579	2539206	2542972	275776	279411	SPCC24B10.07	SPAPYUG7.02c	gad8	sin1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tatebe H (2017)	28264193	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333580	2542972	2539206	279411	275776	SPAPYUG7.02c	SPCC24B10.07	sin1	gad8	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tatebe H (2017)	28264193	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333581	2539206	2542972	275776	279411	SPCC24B10.07	SPAPYUG7.02c	gad8	sin1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tatebe H (2017)	28264193	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333582	2542972	2539206	279411	275776	SPAPYUG7.02c	SPCC24B10.07	sin1	gad8	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Tatebe H (2017)	28264193	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333583	2542972	2539206	279411	275776	SPAPYUG7.02c	SPCC24B10.07	sin1	gad8	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Tatebe H (2017)	28264193	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333589	2540473	2542972	277001	279411	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAPYUG7.02c	tor1	sin1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tatebe H (2017)	28264193	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333590	2539666	2543010	276221	279448	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC10F6.09c	eso1	psm3	-	smc3	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Birot A (2017)	28438891	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2333591	2539666	2540860	276221	277377	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC428.17c	eso1	wpl1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Birot A (2017)	28438891	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2333592	2539666	2541628	276221	278124	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC110.02	eso1	pds5	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Birot A (2017)	28438891	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2333593	2539666	2542387	276221	278851	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC17H9.20	eso1	psc3	-	SPAC607.01	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Birot A (2017)	28438891	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2333594	2539666	2540680	276221	277205	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC26H8.05c	eso1	pph3	-	SPBC26H8.05c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Birot A (2017)	28438891	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2333595	2539666	2540726	276221	277249	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC216.01c	eso1	psy2	-	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Birot A (2017)	28438891	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2333596	2540860	2540726	277377	277249	SPBC428.17c	SPBC216.01c	wpl1	psy2	-	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Birot A (2017)	28438891	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:partial rescue	Wpl1 induction in an eso1 mutant provoked a pronounced cohesion defect which was attenuated by pph3 or psy2	-	BIOGRID
2333597	2540860	2540680	277377	277205	SPBC428.17c	SPBC26H8.05c	wpl1	pph3	-	SPBC26H8.05c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Birot A (2017)	28438891	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:partial rescue	Wpl1 induction in an eso1 mutant provoked a pronounced cohesion defect which was attenuated by pph3 or psy2	-	BIOGRID
2333598	2540726	2540860	277249	277377	SPBC216.01c	SPBC428.17c	psy2	wpl1	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Birot A (2017)	28438891	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333599	2540726	2539447	277249	276010	SPBC216.01c	SPCC338.17c	psy2	rad21	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Birot A (2017)	28438891	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333600	2540726	2540557	277249	277084	SPBC216.01c	SPBC29A10.04	psy2	psm1	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	smc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Birot A (2017)	28438891	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333601	2540726	2543010	277249	279448	SPBC216.01c	SPAC10F6.09c	psy2	psm3	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	smc3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Birot A (2017)	28438891	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333602	2539666	2539447	276221	276010	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC338.17c	eso1	rad21	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Birot A (2017)	28438891	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2333603	2540680	2539447	277205	276010	SPBC26H8.05c	SPCC338.17c	pph3	rad21	SPBC26H8.05c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Birot A (2017)	28438891	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:partial rescue	mutation of rad21 compromises inhibition of the wpl1 mutant phenotype by pph3	-	BIOGRID
2333604	2540726	2539447	277249	276010	SPBC216.01c	SPCC338.17c	psy2	rad21	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Birot A (2017)	28438891	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:partial rescue	mutation of rad21 compromises inhibition of the wpl1 mutant phenotype by psy2	-	BIOGRID
2333606	2540369	2539214	276898	275784	SPBC27B12.02	SPCC1672.10	mis19	mis16	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hirai H (2014)	25375240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2333607	2540369	2538763	276898	275346	SPBC27B12.02	SPCC970.12	mis19	mis18	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Hirai H (2014)	25375240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2333608	2540369	2539214	276898	275784	SPBC27B12.02	SPCC1672.10	mis19	mis16	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Hirai H (2014)	25375240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2333609	2540369	2539214	276898	275784	SPBC27B12.02	SPCC1672.10	mis19	mis16	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hirai H (2014)	25375240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333610	2540369	2538763	276898	275346	SPBC27B12.02	SPCC970.12	mis19	mis18	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hirai H (2014)	25375240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333611	2540369	2540589	276898	277115	SPBC27B12.02	SPBC20F10.06	mis19	mad2	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hirai H (2014)	25375240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	-	-	BIOGRID
2333613	2543084	2541287	279517	277800	SPAC31G5.19	SPBP22H7.05c	abo1	abo2	SPAC31G5.19	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Gal C (2016)	26582768	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2333614	2543084	2541220	279517	277734	SPAC31G5.19	SPBC8D2.04	abo1	hht2	SPAC31G5.19	h3.2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Gal C (2016)	26582768	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|resistance to chemicals|viability	deletion of abo1 in the non-lethal hht2/hhf2 mutant causes cell death at high temperatures and in the presence of MMS|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2333615	2543084	2541200	279517	277714	SPAC31G5.19	SPBC8D2.03c	abo1	hhf2	SPAC31G5.19	ams3|h4.2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Gal C (2016)	26582768	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|resistance to chemicals|viability	deletion of abo1 in the non-lethal hht2/hhf2 mutant causes cell death at high temperatures and in the presence of MMS|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2333616	2543084	2541220	279517	277734	SPAC31G5.19	SPBC8D2.04	abo1	hht2	SPAC31G5.19	h3.2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gal C (2016)	26582768	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333617	2541355	2543084	277866	279517	SPBP8B7.19	SPAC31G5.19	spt16	abo1	-	SPAC31G5.19	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gal C (2016)	26582768	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333618	2541088	2543084	277603	279517	SPBC609.05	SPAC31G5.19	pob3	abo1	-	SPAC31G5.19	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gal C (2016)	26582768	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333619	2541355	2543084	277866	279517	SPBP8B7.19	SPAC31G5.19	spt16	abo1	-	SPAC31G5.19	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Gal C (2016)	26582768	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2333620	2543084	2542878	279517	279323	SPAC31G5.19	SPAC57A10.09c	abo1	nhp6	SPAC31G5.19	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Gal C (2016)	26582768	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2333621	2539817	2543263	276367	279691	SPBC146.03c	SPAC1002.15c	cut3	med6	smc4	pmc5	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sutani T (2015)	26204128	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2333622	2541319	2543263	277831	279691	SPBP4H10.06c	SPAC1002.15c	cut14	med6	smc2	pmc5	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sutani T (2015)	26204128	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2333623	2541599	2541590	278096	278087	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC57A10.02	sid2	cdr2	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Rincon SA (2017)	28162898	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333624	2542029	2541590	278511	278087	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC57A10.02	rad24	cdr2	anr5|sam4	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Rincon SA (2017)	28162898	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2333625	2541590	2539205	278087	275775	SPAC57A10.02	SPCC4B3.15	cdr2	mid1	-	dmf1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rincon SA (2017)	28162898	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution	whereas the single mutants divided symmetrically, the cdr2RXXS-2Amid1nsm double mutant divided asymmetrically	-	BIOGRID
2333626	2541590	2541889	278087	278379	SPAC57A10.02	SPAC2F7.03c	cdr2	pom1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rincon SA (2017)	28162898	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution	double mutants show enhanced defects in division plane positioning	-	BIOGRID
2333830	2541633	2543240	278129	279668	SPAC664.01c	SPAC694.06c	swi6	mrc1	SPAC824.10c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Li PC (2013)	23478021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2333831	2541633	2539004	278129	275578	SPAC664.01c	SPCC4G3.05c	swi6	mus81	SPAC824.10c	slx3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Li PC (2013)	23478021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2333832	2541633	2543580	278129	279995	SPAC664.01c	SPAC644.14c	swi6	rad51	SPAC824.10c	rhp51	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Li PC (2013)	23478021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2333833	2538959	2541633	275533	278129	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC664.01c	cds1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Li PC (2013)	23478021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show sensitivity to HU and TBZ	-	BIOGRID
2333834	2538959	2542239	275533	278711	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC18G6.02c	cds1	chp1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Li PC (2013)	23478021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show sensitivity to HU and TBZ	-	BIOGRID
2333835	2538959	2540825	275533	277343	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC428.08c	cds1	clr4	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Li PC (2013)	23478021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show sensitivity to HU and TBZ	-	BIOGRID
2333836	2538959	2538930	275533	275506	SPCC18B5.11c	SPCC188.13c	cds1	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Li PC (2013)	23478021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show sensitivity to HU and TBZ	-	BIOGRID
2333837	2543240	2541633	279668	278129	SPAC694.06c	SPAC664.01c	mrc1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Li PC (2013)	23478021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show sensitivity to HU and TBZ	-	BIOGRID
2333838	2543240	2542239	279668	278711	SPAC694.06c	SPAC18G6.02c	mrc1	chp1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Li PC (2013)	23478021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show sensitivity to HU and TBZ	-	BIOGRID
2333839	2543240	2540825	279668	277343	SPAC694.06c	SPBC428.08c	mrc1	clr4	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Li PC (2013)	23478021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show sensitivity to HU and TBZ	-	BIOGRID
2333840	2543240	2538930	279668	275506	SPAC694.06c	SPCC188.13c	mrc1	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Li PC (2013)	23478021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show sensitivity to HU and TBZ	-	BIOGRID
2334151	2542414	2539352	278878	275918	SPAC6F6.16c	SPCC188.07	tpz1	ccq1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Moser BA (2015)	26354422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334152	2542414	2539352	278878	275918	SPAC6F6.16c	SPCC188.07	tpz1	ccq1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Moser BA (2015)	26354422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334153	2539352	2542244	275918	278714	SPCC188.07	SPAC19G12.13c	ccq1	poz1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Moser BA (2015)	26354422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2334156	2540821	2539352	277339	275918	SPBC800.03	SPCC188.07	clr3	ccq1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Moser BA (2015)	26354422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334157	2540821	2542414	277339	278878	SPBC800.03	SPAC6F6.16c	clr3	tpz1	-	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	Two-hybrid	physical	Moser BA (2015)	26354422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334158	2539352	2540821	275918	277339	SPCC188.07	SPBC800.03	ccq1	clr3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Moser BA (2015)	26354422	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334159	2538762	2540821	275345	277339	SPCC306.04c	SPBC800.03	set1	clr3	kmt2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Lorenz DR (2014)	25497836	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	TBZ	-	BIOGRID
2334170	2540917	2540458	277433	276986	SPBC409.05	SPBC29A10.14	skp1	rec8	psh1|sph1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Okamoto SY (2012)	22292001	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spindle morphology:partial rescue	deletion of rec8 inhibited the bent-spindle phenotype seen in skp1 mutants	-	BIOGRID
2334171	2540917	2542150	277433	278626	SPBC409.05	SPAC17A5.11	skp1	rec12	psh1|sph1	spo11	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Okamoto SY (2012)	22292001	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spindle morphology:partial rescue	deletion of rec12 inhibited the bent-spindle phenotype seen in skp1 mutants	-	BIOGRID
2334172	2540917	2540244	277433	276776	SPBC409.05	SPBC336.01	skp1	fbh1	psh1|sph1	fdh|fdh1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Okamoto SY (2012)	22292001	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Elevated expression of Fbh1 partially suppressed the growth defects of skp1-a7 at the restrictive temperature	-	BIOGRID
2334174	2540244	2540719	276776	277242	SPBC336.01	SPBC216.05	fbh1	rad3	fdh|fdh1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Okamoto SY (2012)	22292001	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2334175	2540917	2540719	277433	277242	SPBC409.05	SPBC216.05	skp1	rad3	psh1|sph1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Okamoto SY (2012)	22292001	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2334176	2540244	2540719	276776	277242	SPBC336.01	SPBC216.05	fbh1	rad3	fdh|fdh1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Okamoto SY (2012)	22292001	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spindle morphology:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2334177	2540917	2540719	277433	277242	SPBC409.05	SPBC216.05	skp1	rad3	psh1|sph1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Okamoto SY (2012)	22292001	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spindle morphology:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2334178	2539517	2542293	276079	278761	SPCC576.15c	SPAC17G8.14c	ksg1	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Madrid M (2015)	25416816	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334179	2539517	2539649	276079	276204	SPCC576.15c	SPBC12D12.04c	ksg1	pck2	-	pkc1|sts6	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Madrid M (2015)	25416816	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334180	2539517	2539649	276079	276204	SPCC576.15c	SPBC12D12.04c	ksg1	pck2	-	pkc1|sts6	Biochemical Activity	physical	Madrid M (2015)	25416816	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334181	2540473	2539649	277001	276204	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC12D12.04c	tor1	pck2	-	pkc1|sts6	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Madrid M (2015)	25416816	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	tor1/Pck2-K712W double mutants showed additive caspofunginn (CHEBI:474180) sensitivity as compared with that of tor1 single or Pck2-K712W mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
2334182	2539517	2540473	276079	277001	SPCC576.15c	SPBC30D10.10c	ksg1	tor1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Madrid M (2015)	25416816	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	-	-	BIOGRID
2334183	2540735	2539403	277258	275968	SPBC83.03c	SPCC736.11	tas3	ago1	-	csp9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Holoch D (2015)	25730778	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334184	2542862	2539403	279308	275968	SPAC140.03	SPCC736.11	arb1	ago1	-	csp9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Holoch D (2015)	25730778	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334185	2539403	2542862	275968	279308	SPCC736.11	SPAC140.03	ago1	arb1	csp9	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Holoch D (2015)	25730778	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334186	2539403	2542879	275968	279324	SPCC736.11	SPAC13G7.07	ago1	arb2	csp9	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Holoch D (2015)	25730778	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334187	2542862	2539403	279308	275968	SPAC140.03	SPCC736.11	arb1	ago1	-	csp9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Holoch D (2015)	25730778	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	ago1 overexpression suppressed the silencing defect of a pericentromeric reporter transgene in arb1 and arb2 mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
2334188	2542879	2539403	279324	275968	SPAC13G7.07	SPCC736.11	arb2	ago1	-	csp9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Holoch D (2015)	25730778	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	ago1 overexpression suppressed the silencing defect of a pericentromeric reporter transgene in arb1 and arb2 mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
2334197	2543339	2540720	279762	277243	SPAC630.13c	SPBC216.07c	tsc2	tor2	-	SPBC646.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Liu Q (2015)	26447710	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution:wild type	constitutively active tor2 allows transfer of Agp3 rom the trans-Golgi/endosomes to the plasma membrane within 1 h after the shift to nitrogen depletion medium instead of four hours as seen in the tsc2 deletion mutant	-	BIOGRID
2334199	2543629	2542395	280043	278859	SPAC3H5.06c	SPAC1805.05	pol1	cki3	polA|swi7	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Koyano T (2015)	25691662	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology	double mutants exhibit increased bi-polar growth	-	BIOGRID
2334200	2543629	2542395	280043	278859	SPAC3H5.06c	SPAC1805.05	pol1	cki3	polA|swi7	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Koyano T (2015)	25691662	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2334201	2543629	2543044	280043	279479	SPAC3H5.06c	SPAC3C7.12	pol1	tip1	polA|swi7	noc1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Koyano T (2015)	25691662	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2334202	2543629	2540024	280043	276568	SPAC3H5.06c	SPBP4H10.04	pol1	ppb1	polA|swi7	SPBC1346.01c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Koyano T (2015)	25691662	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2334203	2542395	2540024	278859	276568	SPAC1805.05	SPBP4H10.04	cki3	ppb1	-	SPBC1346.01c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Koyano T (2015)	25691662	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334207	2542520	3361329	278978	280405	SPAC20G8.09c	SPBC25H2.10c	nat10	SPBC25H2.10c	SPAC20G8.09c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Sharma S (2015)	25653167	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334210	2539817	2540246	276367	276778	SPBC146.03c	SPBC336.07	cut3	sfc3	smc4	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Iwasaki O (2016)	26704981	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:undetermined	cut3-477 condensin mutation partially decreases condensin activity, while the sfc3-1 mutation can suppress the condensin defect in intra-chromosomal gene associations by promoting condensin binding to Pol III genes	-	BIOGRID
2334211	2538706	2538706	275290	275290	SPCC338.08	SPCC338.08	ctp1	ctp1	mug38|nip1|slr9	mug38|nip1|slr9	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Andres SN (2015)	25580577	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	tetrameric in solution	-	BIOGRID
2334212	2538706	2538706	275290	275290	SPCC338.08	SPCC338.08	ctp1	ctp1	mug38|nip1|slr9	mug38|nip1|slr9	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Andres SN (2015)	25580577	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	tetrameric in solution	-	BIOGRID
2334213	2538706	2541045	275290	277560	SPCC338.08	SPBC543.03c	ctp1	pku80	mug38|nip1|slr9	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Andres SN (2015)	25580577	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionizing radiation resistance:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	pku80 deletion suppresses the slow growth phenotypes, IR and phleomycin (CHEBI:75044)-sensitivities of all ctp1 mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
2334214	2541045	2540348	277560	276877	SPBC543.03c	SPBC29A10.05	pku80	exo1	-	mut2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Andres SN (2015)	25580577	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	ionizing radiation resistance:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	mutation of exo1 inhibits the rescue of ctp1 seen when pku80 is deleted	-	BIOGRID
2334215	2538951	2539027	275525	275600	SPCC297.03	SPCC1322.08	ssp1	srk1	-	mkp1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Gomez-Hierro A (2015)	26575035	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	srk1 deletion rescued the cell division arrest of ssp1 deletion mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
2334216	2538951	2542632	275525	279086	SPCC297.03	SPAC24H6.05	ssp1	cdc25	-	sal2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Gomez-Hierro A (2015)	26575035	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	mutation of Srk1-phosphorylation sites of Cdc25 abolished the cell cycle arrest of ssp1 deletion mutants	-	BIOGRID
2334217	2539027	2539123	275600	275695	SPCC1322.08	SPCC18B5.03	srk1	wee1	mkp1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Gomez-Hierro A (2015)	26575035	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type	The rescue of the slow growth of ssp1 deletion by srk1 deletion is abolished by the absence of wee1.	-	BIOGRID
2334218	2538951	2539064	275525	275636	SPCC297.03	SPCC126.06	ssp1	twf1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Gomez-Hierro A (2015)	26575035	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	deletion of twf1 suppressed the monopolar localization of the actin patches in ssp1 mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
2334219	2538951	2539064	275525	275636	SPCC297.03	SPCC126.06	ssp1	twf1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gomez-Hierro A (2015)	26575035	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334220	2539869	2541193	276415	277707	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC776.02c	cdc2	dis2	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	bws1|sds1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Grallert A (2015)	25487150	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334221	2541519	2541193	278020	277707	SPAC227.07c	SPBC776.02c	pab1	dis2	ret1	bws1|sds1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Grallert A (2015)	25487150	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334222	2539379	2541193	275945	277707	SPCC188.02	SPBC776.02c	par1	dis2	-	bws1|sds1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Grallert A (2015)	25487150	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334223	2539379	2541193	275945	277707	SPCC188.02	SPBC776.02c	par1	dis2	-	bws1|sds1	Two-hybrid	physical	Grallert A (2015)	25487150	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334224	2541193	2541519	277707	278020	SPBC776.02c	SPAC227.07c	dis2	pab1	bws1|sds1	ret1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Grallert A (2015)	25487150	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334225	2541193	2539379	277707	275945	SPBC776.02c	SPCC188.02	dis2	par1	bws1|sds1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Grallert A (2015)	25487150	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334245	2538744	2539817	275327	276367	SPCC306.03c	SPBC146.03c	cnd2	cut3	-	smc4	Two-hybrid	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334246	2538744	2541319	275327	277831	SPCC306.03c	SPBP4H10.06c	cnd2	cut14	-	smc2	Two-hybrid	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334247	2538744	2541201	275327	277715	SPCC306.03c	SPBC776.13	cnd2	cnd1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334249	2538744	2539121	275327	275693	SPCC306.03c	SPCC188.03	cnd2	cnd3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334250	2538744	2541582	275327	278079	SPCC306.03c	SPAC29E6.08	cnd2	tbp1	-	SPAC30.12|tbp|tdf1	Two-hybrid	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334251	2538744	2542856	275327	279302	SPCC306.03c	SPAC6F12.11c	cnd2	sfc1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334252	2538744	2540246	275327	276778	SPCC306.03c	SPBC336.07	cnd2	sfc3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334253	2538744	2539187	275327	275758	SPCC306.03c	SPCC16C4.14c	cnd2	sfc4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334254	2538744	2540424	275327	276952	SPCC306.03c	SPBC21H7.05	cnd2	sfc6	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334255	2538744	5802974	275327	858112	SPCC306.03c	SPAC1250.07	cnd2	sfc7	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334256	2538744	2541253	275327	277767	SPCC306.03c	SPBC8D2.07c	cnd2	sfc9	-	SPBC8D2.08c	Two-hybrid	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334257	2541201	2538744	277715	275327	SPBC776.13	SPCC306.03c	cnd1	cnd2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334258	2541319	2538744	277831	275327	SPBP4H10.06c	SPCC306.03c	cut14	cnd2	smc2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334259	2539121	2538744	275693	275327	SPCC188.03	SPCC306.03c	cnd3	cnd2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334260	2539187	2538744	275758	275327	SPCC16C4.14c	SPCC306.03c	sfc4	cnd2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334261	2540071	2541582	276609	278079	SPBC13E7.10c	SPAC29E6.08	brf1	tbp1	SPBC30D10.20	SPAC30.12|tbp|tdf1	Two-hybrid	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334262	2540071	2538909	276609	275486	SPBC13E7.10c	SPCC1919.14c	brf1	bdp1	SPBC30D10.20	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334264	2540071	2539187	276609	275758	SPBC13E7.10c	SPCC16C4.14c	brf1	sfc4	SPBC30D10.20	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334265	2538744	2540071	275327	276609	SPCC306.03c	SPBC13E7.10c	cnd2	brf1	-	SPBC30D10.20	Two-hybrid	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334266	2538909	2540071	275486	276609	SPCC1919.14c	SPBC13E7.10c	bdp1	brf1	-	SPBC30D10.20	Two-hybrid	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334267	2539187	2540071	275758	276609	SPCC16C4.14c	SPBC13E7.10c	sfc4	brf1	-	SPBC30D10.20	Two-hybrid	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334268	2542856	5802974	279302	858112	SPAC6F12.11c	SPAC1250.07	sfc1	sfc7	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334270	2540424	2541253	276952	277767	SPBC21H7.05	SPBC8D2.07c	sfc6	sfc9	-	SPBC8D2.08c	Two-hybrid	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334271	2541253	2540424	277767	276952	SPBC8D2.07c	SPBC21H7.05	sfc9	sfc6	SPBC8D2.08c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334272	2538744	2539187	275327	275758	SPCC306.03c	SPCC16C4.14c	cnd2	sfc4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334273	2541582	2541319	278079	277831	SPAC29E6.08	SPBP4H10.06c	tbp1	cut14	SPAC30.12|tbp|tdf1	smc2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334274	2538744	2541582	275327	278079	SPCC306.03c	SPAC29E6.08	cnd2	tbp1	-	SPAC30.12|tbp|tdf1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334275	2541582	2538744	278079	275327	SPAC29E6.08	SPCC306.03c	tbp1	cnd2	SPAC30.12|tbp|tdf1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334276	2541582	2538744	278079	275327	SPAC29E6.08	SPCC306.03c	tbp1	cnd2	SPAC30.12|tbp|tdf1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334277	2539121	2538744	275693	275327	SPCC188.03	SPCC306.03c	cnd3	cnd2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334278	2538744	2539817	275327	276367	SPCC306.03c	SPBC146.03c	cnd2	cut3	-	smc4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334279	2538744	2541319	275327	277831	SPCC306.03c	SPBP4H10.06c	cnd2	cut14	-	smc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334280	2538744	2541201	275327	277715	SPCC306.03c	SPBC776.13	cnd2	cnd1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334281	2538744	2539121	275327	275693	SPCC306.03c	SPCC188.03	cnd2	cnd3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334283	2541582	2538744	278079	275327	SPAC29E6.08	SPCC306.03c	tbp1	cnd2	SPAC30.12|tbp|tdf1	-	Co-localization	physical	Iwasaki O (2015)	26257282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334288	2541973	2539914	278458	276458	SPAC6G9.13c	SPBC12D12.01	bqt1	sad1	mug23|rec26	SPBC16H5.01c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Fernandez-Alvarez A (2016)	27889481	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spindle morphology	double mutants show a complete loss of bi-polar spindle formation compared to the partial loss seen in single mutants	-	BIOGRID
2334289	2539914	2541973	276458	278458	SPBC12D12.01	SPAC6G9.13c	sad1	bqt1	SPBC16H5.01c	mug23|rec26	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Fernandez-Alvarez A (2016)	27889481	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spindle morphology:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	induced expression of Bqt1-GBP in Sad1-mis6 mutant confers some stable centromere association which rescues proper bipolar spindle formation and viability	-	BIOGRID
2334290	2539914	2540281	276458	276812	SPBC12D12.01	SPBC2G2.14	sad1	csi1	SPBC16H5.01c	SPBC2G2.14	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Fernandez-Alvarez A (2016)	27889481	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spindle morphology:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	induced expression of Csi1-GBP in Sad1-mis6 mutant confers some stable centromere association which rescues proper bipolar spindle formation and viability	-	BIOGRID
2334291	2542161	2539914	278637	276458	SPAC1786.03	SPBC12D12.01	cut11	sad1	SPAC24C9.01	SPBC16H5.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Fernandez-Alvarez A (2016)	27889481	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein transport:partial rescue	introduction of the sad1.2 mutation strongly averts the nuclear efflux phenotype of cut11.1 cells	-	BIOGRID
2334292	2542723	2543425	279174	279845	SPAC25H1.03	SPAC4F10.07c	atg101	atg13	mug66	apg13|mug78	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Suzuki H (2015)	26030876	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334293	2542723	2543425	279174	279845	SPAC25H1.03	SPAC4F10.07c	atg101	atg13	mug66	apg13|mug78	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Suzuki H (2015)	26030876	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334294	2542723	2543425	279174	279845	SPAC25H1.03	SPAC4F10.07c	atg101	atg13	mug66	apg13|mug78	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Suzuki H (2015)	26030876	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334295	2542723	2543425	279174	279845	SPAC25H1.03	SPAC4F10.07c	atg101	atg13	mug66	apg13|mug78	Co-fractionation	physical	Suzuki H (2015)	26030876	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334296	2539087	2538959	275659	275533	SPCC1259.13	SPCC18B5.11c	chk1	cds1	rad27	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sartagul W (2014)	25372384	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	HU-induced rhp51 transcription was reduced to a greater extent in chk1/cds1 double mutant cells than in either of the single knockout cells	-	BIOGRID
2334297	2539703	2540643	276256	277168	SPBC16G5.15c	SPBC19G7.06	fkh2	mbx1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Suarez MB (2015)	26237280	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue	deletion of mbx1 inhibits the increase in transcription of some target genes caused by fkh2 deletion	-	BIOGRID
2334298	2541889	2541889	278379	278379	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC2F7.03c	pom1	pom1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Hersch M (2015)	26150232	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334300	2542002	2542486	278486	278945	SPAC2G11.08c	SPAC19B12.12c	smn1	yip11	yab8	yip1|yip1-a	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Gupta K (2015)	26092730	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334301	2539123	2540719	275695	277242	SPCC18B5.03	SPBC216.05	wee1	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Anda S (2016)	26918805	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2334302	2539123	2542696	275695	279149	SPCC18B5.03	SPAC29B12.03	wee1	spd1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Anda S (2016)	26918805	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	at the semirestrictive temperature of 30 degrees the lack of Spd1 partially restored the viability of wee1/rad3 mutant cells|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2334303	2540719	2542696	277242	279149	SPBC216.05	SPAC29B12.03	rad3	spd1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Anda S (2016)	26918805	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	at the semirestrictive temperature of 30 degrees the lack of Spd1 partially restored the viability of wee1/rad3 mutant cells|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2334304	2539123	2538959	275695	275533	SPCC18B5.03	SPCC18B5.11c	wee1	cds1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Anda S (2016)	26918805	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2334305	2539123	2539087	275695	275659	SPCC18B5.03	SPCC1259.13	wee1	chk1	-	rad27	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Anda S (2016)	26918805	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2334306	2539123	2542632	275695	279086	SPCC18B5.03	SPAC24H6.05	wee1	cdc25	-	sal2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Anda S (2016)	26918805	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	cdc25-22 can partially rescue the lethality of the wee1-50/rad3 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2334307	2540719	2542632	277242	279086	SPBC216.05	SPAC24H6.05	rad3	cdc25	-	sal2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Anda S (2016)	26918805	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	cdc25-22 can partially rescue the lethality of the wee1-50/rad3 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2334309	2539869	2539703	276415	276256	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC16G5.15c	cdc2	fkh2	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Alves-Rodrigues I (2016)	26804917	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	cdk1 phosphorylates fkh2 in response to cig2 activation	-	BIOGRID
2334310	2541972	2540236	278457	276768	SPAC23C11.11	SPBC336.09c	cka1	rrn7	orb5	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Moreira-Ramos S (2015)	25410910	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334311	2540236	2541972	276768	278457	SPBC336.09c	SPAC23C11.11	rrn7	cka1	-	orb5	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Moreira-Ramos S (2015)	25410910	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334312	2540236	2542564	276768	279020	SPBC336.09c	SPAC1851.03	rrn7	ckb1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Moreira-Ramos S (2015)	25410910	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334313	2540236	2541972	276768	278457	SPBC336.09c	SPAC23C11.11	rrn7	cka1	-	orb5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Moreira-Ramos S (2015)	25410910	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334314	2540236	2542564	276768	279020	SPBC336.09c	SPAC1851.03	rrn7	ckb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Moreira-Ramos S (2015)	25410910	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334315	2541940	2539765	278427	276316	SPAC27F1.02c	SPBC1778.06c	cdc8	fim1	fus4	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Cranz-Mileva S (2015)	26187949	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology	-	-	BIOGRID
2334337	2542225	2540292	278698	276823	SPAC19B12.05c	SPBC28F2.12	fcp1	rpb1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Schwer B (2015)	25883047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:partial rescue	Lethality of gatekeeper mutations R271A and R299A is rescued by CTD shortening	-	BIOGRID
2334338	2542225	2543452	278698	279872	SPAC19B12.05c	SPAC3G9.04	fcp1	ssu72	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Schwer B (2015)	25883047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2334339	2542225	2541916	278698	278406	SPAC19B12.05c	SPAC23C4.19	fcp1	spt5	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Schwer B (2015)	25883047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Dephosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334340	2542225	2540627	278698	277153	SPAC19B12.05c	SPBC25H2.13c	fcp1	cdc20	-	pol2	Biochemical Activity	physical	Schwer B (2015)	25883047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Dephosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334343	2541606	2541764	278103	278258	SPAC11H11.04	SPAC22F3.12c	mam2	rgs1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Croft W (2013)	23900842	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334345	2541606	2541764	278103	278258	SPAC11H11.04	SPAC22F3.12c	mam2	rgs1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Croft W (2013)	23900842	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334375	2543360	3361400	279782	280476	SPAC664.10	SPAC1093.06c	klp2	dhc1	-	SPAC30C2.01c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Scheffler K (2015)	25869666	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nuclear fusion during mating	-	-	BIOGRID
2334376	2543360	2543586	279782	280001	SPAC664.10	SPAC458.04c	klp2	dli1	-	dil1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Scheffler K (2015)	25869666	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nuclear fusion during mating	-	-	BIOGRID
2334377	2543360	3361400	279782	280476	SPAC664.10	SPAC1093.06c	klp2	dhc1	-	SPAC30C2.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Scheffler K (2015)	25869666	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	nuclear fusion during mating:partial rescue	Dynein overexpression speeds up klp2 mutant nuclear congression	-	BIOGRID
2334378	2540737	2541975	277260	278460	SPBC19G7.05c	SPAC20G8.05c	bgs1	cdc15	cps1|drc1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Cortes JC (2015)	26132084	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution|septum formation	Cdc15, through the SH3 domain, and likely through Pxl1, cooperates with Bgs1 to confer stability to the CAR and to form the septum during cytokinesis.	-	BIOGRID
2334379	2540856	2541975	277373	278460	SPBC4F6.12	SPAC20G8.05c	pxl1	cdc15	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Cortes JC (2015)	26132084	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2334380	2540737	2540856	277260	277373	SPBC19G7.05c	SPBC4F6.12	bgs1	pxl1	cps1|drc1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Cortes JC (2015)	26132084	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution|septum formation	-	-	BIOGRID
2334381	2540473	2539845	277001	276393	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC12C2.02c	tor1	ste20	-	ste16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Baker K (2016)	27206859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334382	2540473	2539205	277001	275775	SPBC30D10.10c	SPCC4B3.15	tor1	mid1	-	dmf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Baker K (2016)	27206859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334383	2540473	2540380	277001	276909	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC1A4.05	tor1	blt1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Baker K (2016)	27206859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334384	2540473	2541327	277001	277839	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBP23A10.10	tor1	ppk32	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Baker K (2016)	27206859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334385	2540473	2543576	277001	279991	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC4A8.05c	tor1	myp2	-	myo3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Baker K (2016)	27206859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334386	2540473	2540560	277001	277087	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC2D10.14c	tor1	myo51	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Baker K (2016)	27206859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334387	2540473	2540645	277001	277170	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC21B10.05c	tor1	pop3	-	wat1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Baker K (2016)	27206859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334388	2540473	2542972	277001	279411	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAPYUG7.02c	tor1	sin1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Baker K (2016)	27206859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334389	2540473	2539206	277001	275776	SPBC30D10.10c	SPCC24B10.07	tor1	gad8	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Baker K (2016)	27206859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334390	2540473	2541603	277001	278100	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC1F5.04c	tor1	cdc12	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Baker K (2016)	27206859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334391	2540560	2540473	277087	277001	SPBC2D10.14c	SPBC30D10.10c	myo51	tor1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Baker K (2016)	27206859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334393	2543576	2539845	279991	276393	SPAC4A8.05c	SPBC12C2.02c	myp2	ste20	myo3	ste16	Co-localization	physical	Baker K (2016)	27206859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334394	2540560	2539845	277087	276393	SPBC2D10.14c	SPBC12C2.02c	myo51	ste20	-	ste16	Co-localization	physical	Baker K (2016)	27206859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334395	2539845	2543576	276393	279991	SPBC12C2.02c	SPAC4A8.05c	ste20	myp2	ste16	myo3	Co-localization	physical	Baker K (2016)	27206859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334396	2542679	2543390	279132	279812	SPAC12B10.07	SPAC631.01c	acp1	acp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Baker K (2016)	27206859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334397	2540051	2543526	276589	279944	SPBC32H8.12c	SPAC4A8.15c	act1	cdc3	cps8|pi012	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Suarez C (2015)	25543282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology:wild type	simultaneously O.E. actin and profilin together suppresses contractile ring and actin patch defects caused by O.E. either actin, or profilin alone	-	BIOGRID
2334398	2543526	2540051	279944	276589	SPAC4A8.15c	SPBC32H8.12c	cdc3	act1	-	cps8|pi012	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Suarez C (2015)	25543282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	actin cytoskeleton morphology:wild type	simultaneously O.E. actin and profilin together suppresses contractile ring and actin patch defects caused by O.E. either actin, or profilin alone	-	BIOGRID
2334399	2543589	5802965	280004	858103	SPAC4F10.15c	SPAC11H11.06	wsp1	arp2	-	SPAC22F8.01	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Suarez C (2015)	25543282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334400	2543589	2543233	280004	279661	SPAC4F10.15c	SPAC630.03	wsp1	arp3	-	act2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Suarez C (2015)	25543282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334401	2543589	2540051	280004	276589	SPAC4F10.15c	SPBC32H8.12c	wsp1	act1	-	cps8|pi012	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Suarez C (2015)	25543282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334435	2540320	2540589	276850	277115	SPBC3D6.04c	SPBC20F10.06	mad1	mad2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Heinrich S (2014)	24477934	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334436	2543054	2543054	279488	279488	SPAC3A11.02	SPAC3A11.02	cps3	cps3	mug188|scp3	mug188|scp3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ozaki K (2015)	25767875	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	in the presence of CIPC	-	BIOGRID
2334443	2542313	2542144	278779	278620	SPAC16A10.07c	SPAC6F6.17	taz1	rif1	myb|myb1	SPAPJ736.01|tap1|tap11	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Zaaijer S (2016)	27320927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue	approximately half of the rif1-PP1 clones rescuing taz1 deletion cold sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
2334444	2541165	2542144	277680	278620	SPBC776.12c	SPAC6F6.17	hsk1	rif1	cdc7	SPAPJ736.01|tap1|tap11	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Zaaijer S (2016)	27320927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2334445	2542544	2538959	279001	275533	SPAC18G6.10	SPCC18B5.11c	lem2	cds1	heh1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Xu YJ (2016)	26746798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	lem2 showed an additive sensitivity to HU (CHEBI:44423) when combined with cds1, mrc1 or chk1 deletion|lem2 showed an additive sensitivity to HU when combined with cds1, mrc1 or chk1 deletion	-	BIOGRID
2334446	2542544	2543240	279001	279668	SPAC18G6.10	SPAC694.06c	lem2	mrc1	heh1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Xu YJ (2016)	26746798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	lem2 showed an additive sensitivity to HU (CHEBI:44423) when combined with cds1, mrc1 or chk1 deletion|lem2 showed an additive sensitivity to HU when combined with cds1, mrc1 or chk1 deletion	-	BIOGRID
2334447	2542544	2539087	279001	275659	SPAC18G6.10	SPCC1259.13	lem2	chk1	heh1	rad27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Xu YJ (2016)	26746798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	lem2 showed an additive sensitivity to HU (CHEBI:44423) when combined with cds1, mrc1 or chk1 deletion|lem2 showed an additive sensitivity to HU when combined with cds1, mrc1 or chk1 deletion	-	BIOGRID
2334448	2540719	2539209	277242	275779	SPBC216.05	SPCC23B6.03c	rad3	tel1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Xu YJ (2016)	26746798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	double mutants show a complete loss of rad9 phosphorylation	-	BIOGRID
2334449	2540719	2540381	277242	276910	SPBC216.05	SPBC25D12.04	rad3	suc22	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Xu YJ (2016)	26746798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|viability	HU (CHEBI:44423)	-	BIOGRID
2334450	2543240	2540381	279668	276910	SPAC694.06c	SPBC25D12.04	mrc1	suc22	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Xu YJ (2016)	26746798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|viability	HU (CHEBI:44423)	-	BIOGRID
2334451	2538959	2540381	275533	276910	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC25D12.04	cds1	suc22	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Xu YJ (2016)	26746798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|viability	HU (CHEBI:44423)	-	BIOGRID
2334452	2542544	2540381	279001	276910	SPAC18G6.10	SPBC25D12.04	lem2	suc22	heh1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Xu YJ (2016)	26746798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|viability	HU (CHEBI:44423)	-	BIOGRID
2334456	2541201	2541319	277715	277831	SPBC776.13	SPBP4H10.06c	cnd1	cut14	-	smc2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Xu X (2015)	25764183	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2334457	2538744	2541319	275327	277831	SPCC306.03c	SPBP4H10.06c	cnd2	cut14	-	smc2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Xu X (2015)	25764183	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2334458	2539121	2541319	275693	277831	SPCC188.03	SPBP4H10.06c	cnd3	cut14	-	smc2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Xu X (2015)	25764183	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2334459	2541201	2539817	277715	276367	SPBC776.13	SPBC146.03c	cnd1	cut3	-	smc4	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Xu X (2015)	25764183	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2334460	2538744	2539817	275327	276367	SPCC306.03c	SPBC146.03c	cnd2	cut3	-	smc4	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Xu X (2015)	25764183	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2334461	2539121	2539817	275693	276367	SPCC188.03	SPBC146.03c	cnd3	cut3	-	smc4	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Xu X (2015)	25764183	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2334462	2539121	2542304	275693	278771	SPCC188.03	SPAC1687.20c	cnd3	mis6	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Xu X (2015)	25764183	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2334463	2539121	2539497	275693	276060	SPCC188.03	SPCC895.07	cnd3	alp14	-	mtc1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Xu X (2015)	25764183	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2334464	2539121	2540589	275693	277115	SPCC188.03	SPBC20F10.06	cnd3	mad2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Xu X (2015)	25764183	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2334465	2539505	2539121	276068	275693	SPCC736.14	SPCC188.03	dis1	cnd3	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Xu X (2015)	25764183	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2334466	2541193	2539121	277707	275693	SPBC776.02c	SPCC188.03	dis2	cnd3	bws1|sds1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Xu X (2015)	25764183	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2334470	2539275	2542475	275843	278935	SPCC1450.04	SPAC1F12.02c	tef5	SPAC1F12.02c	-	p23fy	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Wu H (2015)	25635048	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	ITC	-	BIOGRID
2334472	2538763	2538763	275346	275346	SPCC970.12	SPCC970.12	mis18	mis18	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Nardi IK (2016)	26942680	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334517	2542313	2540728	278779	277251	SPAC16A10.07c	SPBC216.06c	taz1	swi1	myb|myb1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Gadaleta MC (2016)	26990647	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2334518	2542244	2540728	278714	277251	SPAC19G12.13c	SPBC216.06c	poz1	swi1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Gadaleta MC (2016)	26990647	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2334519	2542144	2540728	278620	277251	SPAC6F6.17	SPBC216.06c	rif1	swi1	SPAPJ736.01|tap1|tap11	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Gadaleta MC (2016)	26990647	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2334525	2540601	2540728	277127	277251	SPBC29A3.14c	SPBC216.06c	trt1	swi1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Gadaleta MC (2016)	26990647	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	-	-	BIOGRID
2334526	2540492	2540728	277020	277251	SPBC2D10.13	SPBC216.06c	est1	swi1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Gadaleta MC (2016)	26990647	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	-	-	BIOGRID
2334532	2540097	2541193	276635	277707	SPBC11C11.03	SPBC776.02c	ndc80	dis2	ndc10|tid3	bws1|sds1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tang NH (2015)	25472718	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2334533	2540097	2541193	276635	277707	SPBC11C11.03	SPBC776.02c	ndc80	dis2	ndc10|tid3	bws1|sds1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tang NH (2015)	25472718	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2334534	2540097	2541856	276635	278347	SPBC11C11.03	SPAC23H3.08c	ndc80	bub3	ndc10|tid3	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tang NH (2015)	25472718	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2334535	2540097	2540361	276635	276890	SPBC11C11.03	SPBC2F12.13	ndc80	klp5	ndc10|tid3	sot1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tang NH (2015)	25472718	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2334536	2540097	2539700	276635	276253	SPBC11C11.03	SPBC1685.15c	ndc80	klp6	ndc10|tid3	SPBC649.01c|sot2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tang NH (2015)	25472718	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2334537	2540361	2543382	276890	279804	SPBC2F12.13	SPAC890.02c	klp5	alp7	sot1	mia1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tang NH (2015)	25472718	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2334538	2540097	2543382	276635	279804	SPBC11C11.03	SPAC890.02c	ndc80	alp7	ndc10|tid3	mia1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tang NH (2015)	25472718	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2334539	2543382	2540589	279804	277115	SPAC890.02c	SPBC20F10.06	alp7	mad2	mia1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tang NH (2015)	25472718	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2334540	2540352	2540885	276881	277402	SPBC215.03c	SPBC660.14	csn1	mik1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ruan K (2015)	25492408	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	deletion of mik1/wee1 in a csn1 background is lethal	-	BIOGRID
2334541	2540352	2539123	276881	275695	SPBC215.03c	SPCC18B5.03	csn1	wee1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ruan K (2015)	25492408	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	deletion of mik1/wee1 in a csn1 background is lethal	-	BIOGRID
2334542	2540352	2538959	276881	275533	SPBC215.03c	SPCC18B5.11c	csn1	cds1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ruan K (2015)	25492408	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2334543	2542207	2538959	278682	275533	SPAC17H9.10c	SPCC18B5.11c	ddb1	cds1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ruan K (2015)	25492408	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2334544	2542070	2540292	278547	276823	SPAC29B12.02c	SPBC28F2.12	set2	rpb1	kmt3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Suzuki S (2016)	26792892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334545	2542070	2541446	278547	277951	SPAC29B12.02c	SPAC23G3.01	set2	rpb2	kmt3	SPAC521.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Suzuki S (2016)	26792892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334546	2542070	2538816	278547	275397	SPAC29B12.02c	SPCC1442.10c	set2	rpb3	kmt3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Suzuki S (2016)	26792892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334547	2542070	2541011	278547	277526	SPAC29B12.02c	SPBC337.14	set2	rpb4	kmt3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Suzuki S (2016)	26792892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334548	2542070	2541910	278547	278400	SPAC29B12.02c	SPAC23C4.15	set2	rpb5	kmt3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Suzuki S (2016)	26792892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334549	2542070	2542097	278547	278573	SPAC29B12.02c	SPACUNK4.06c	set2	rpb7	kmt3	SPAPYUK71.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Suzuki S (2016)	26792892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334550	2542070	2540292	278547	276823	SPAC29B12.02c	SPBC28F2.12	set2	rpb1	kmt3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Suzuki S (2016)	26792892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334551	2542173	2543254	278648	279682	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC1006.03c	mtl1	red1	SPAC17H9.02	iss3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334552	2542173	2541143	278648	277658	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC725.08	mtl1	pir2	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC725.08|ars2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334553	2542173	2542556	278648	279013	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC6G10.07	mtl1	cbc1	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC6G10.07	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334554	2542173	2539791	278648	276341	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC13A2.01c	mtl1	cbc2	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC13A2.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334555	2542173	2539733	278648	276285	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC16E9.12c	mtl1	pab2	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334556	2542173	2540291	278648	276822	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC337.12	mtl1	red5	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC337.12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334557	2542173	2541281	278648	277794	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC902.04	mtl1	rmn1	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC902.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334558	2542173	2539540	278648	276102	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC736.12c	mtl1	mmi1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334559	2542173	2541655	278648	278151	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC7D4.14c	mtl1	iss10	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334560	2542173	2541099	278648	277614	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC646.04	mtl1	pla1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334561	2542173	2540691	278648	277216	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC20F10.05	mtl1	nrl1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334562	2542173	2542837	278648	279283	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC140.04	mtl1	ctr1	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC140.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334563	2543254	2542173	279682	278648	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC17H9.02	red1	mtl1	iss3	SPAC17H9.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334564	2543254	2541143	279682	277658	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC725.08	red1	pir2	iss3	SPBC725.08|ars2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334565	2543254	2542556	279682	279013	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC6G10.07	red1	cbc1	iss3	SPAC6G10.07	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334566	2543254	2539791	279682	276341	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC13A2.01c	red1	cbc2	iss3	SPBC13A2.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334567	2543254	2539733	279682	276285	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC16E9.12c	red1	pab2	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334568	2543254	2540291	279682	276822	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC337.12	red1	red5	iss3	SPBC337.12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334569	2543254	2541281	279682	277794	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC902.04	red1	rmn1	iss3	SPBC902.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334570	2543254	2539540	279682	276102	SPAC1006.03c	SPCC736.12c	red1	mmi1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334571	2543254	2541655	279682	278151	SPAC1006.03c	SPAC7D4.14c	red1	iss10	iss3	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334572	2543254	2541099	279682	277614	SPAC1006.03c	SPBC646.04	red1	pla1	iss3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334573	2540291	2542173	276822	278648	SPBC337.12	SPAC17H9.02	red5	mtl1	SPBC337.12	SPAC17H9.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334574	2540291	2541143	276822	277658	SPBC337.12	SPBC725.08	red5	pir2	SPBC337.12	SPBC725.08|ars2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334575	2540291	2542556	276822	279013	SPBC337.12	SPAC6G10.07	red5	cbc1	SPBC337.12	SPAC6G10.07	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334576	2540291	2539791	276822	276341	SPBC337.12	SPBC13A2.01c	red5	cbc2	SPBC337.12	SPBC13A2.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334577	2540291	2539733	276822	276285	SPBC337.12	SPBC16E9.12c	red5	pab2	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334578	2540291	2543254	276822	279682	SPBC337.12	SPAC1006.03c	red5	red1	SPBC337.12	iss3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334579	2540291	2541281	276822	277794	SPBC337.12	SPBC902.04	red5	rmn1	SPBC337.12	SPBC902.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334580	2540291	2539540	276822	276102	SPBC337.12	SPCC736.12c	red5	mmi1	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334581	2540291	2541655	276822	278151	SPBC337.12	SPAC7D4.14c	red5	iss10	SPBC337.12	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334582	2540291	2541099	276822	277614	SPBC337.12	SPBC646.04	red5	pla1	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334583	2541143	2542173	277658	278648	SPBC725.08	SPAC17H9.02	pir2	mtl1	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPAC17H9.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334584	2541143	2543254	277658	279682	SPBC725.08	SPAC1006.03c	pir2	red1	SPBC725.08|ars2	iss3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334585	2541143	2542556	277658	279013	SPBC725.08	SPAC6G10.07	pir2	cbc1	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPAC6G10.07	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334586	2541143	2539791	277658	276341	SPBC725.08	SPBC13A2.01c	pir2	cbc2	SPBC725.08|ars2	SPBC13A2.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334587	2541143	2539540	277658	276102	SPBC725.08	SPCC736.12c	pir2	mmi1	SPBC725.08|ars2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334588	2542556	2542173	279013	278648	SPAC6G10.07	SPAC17H9.02	cbc1	mtl1	SPAC6G10.07	SPAC17H9.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334589	2542556	2543254	279013	279682	SPAC6G10.07	SPAC1006.03c	cbc1	red1	SPAC6G10.07	iss3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334590	2542556	2541143	279013	277658	SPAC6G10.07	SPBC725.08	cbc1	pir2	SPAC6G10.07	SPBC725.08|ars2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334591	2542556	2539791	279013	276341	SPAC6G10.07	SPBC13A2.01c	cbc1	cbc2	SPAC6G10.07	SPBC13A2.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334592	2542556	2539540	279013	276102	SPAC6G10.07	SPCC736.12c	cbc1	mmi1	SPAC6G10.07	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334593	2540691	2542173	277216	278648	SPBC20F10.05	SPAC17H9.02	nrl1	mtl1	-	SPAC17H9.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334594	2540691	2541143	277216	277658	SPBC20F10.05	SPBC725.08	nrl1	pir2	-	SPBC725.08|ars2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334595	2540691	2542556	277216	279013	SPBC20F10.05	SPAC6G10.07	nrl1	cbc1	-	SPAC6G10.07	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334596	2540691	2539540	277216	276102	SPBC20F10.05	SPCC736.12c	nrl1	mmi1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334597	2540691	2542837	277216	279283	SPBC20F10.05	SPAC140.04	nrl1	ctr1	-	SPAC140.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334598	2542173	2541505	278648	278007	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC57A7.04c	mtl1	pabp	SPAC17H9.02	pab1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334599	2542173	2541150	278648	277665	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC660.15	mtl1	SPBC660.15	SPAC17H9.02	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334600	2542173	2539035	278648	275608	SPAC17H9.02	SPCC794.09c	mtl1	tef101	SPAC17H9.02	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhou Y (2015)	25989903	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334654	2542028	2541821	278510	278312	SPAC2F3.09	SPAC1F8.02c	hem1	shu1	-	SPAC1F8.02c	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Mourer T (2015)	25733668	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334944	2541593	2543026	278090	279462	SPAC25B8.04c	SPAC664.11	mss51	ssc1	-	ssp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ostojic J (2016)	27257059	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2334945	2541806	2540706	278297	277229	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC19C7.12c	prz1	omh1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chatfield-Reed K (2016)	26896331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	loss of omh1 or pvg1 abrogated the zymolyase resistance caused by prz1 overexpression	-	BIOGRID
2334946	2541806	2543508	278297	279926	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC8F11.10c	prz1	pvg1	-	SPACUNK4.18	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chatfield-Reed K (2016)	26896331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	loss of omh1 or pvg1 abrogated the zymolyase resistance caused by prz1 overexpression	-	BIOGRID
2334947	2541806	2539287	278297	275855	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC1742.01	prz1	gsf2	-	SPCC1742.01|pfl1|SPCC1795.13|SPCPB16A4.07c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chatfield-Reed K (2016)	26896331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation:wild type	loss of gsf2 or cbf12 could abrogate the constitutive flocculation observed in prz1 deletion cells	-	BIOGRID
2334948	2541806	2539119	278297	275691	SPAC4G8.13c	SPCC1223.13	prz1	cbf12	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chatfield-Reed K (2016)	26896331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation:wild type	loss of gsf2 or cbf12 could abrogate the constitutive flocculation observed in prz1 deletion cells	-	BIOGRID
2334978	2539473	2540345	276036	276874	SPCP25A2.02c	SPBC19C7.09c	rhp26	uve1	-	uvde	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Wang L (2014)	25512493	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance	-	-	BIOGRID
2334997	2542207	2539726	278682	276278	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC13E7.08c	ddb1	leo1	-	SPBC13E7.08c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sadeghi L (2015)	26518661	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2334998	2542207	2543560	278682	279976	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC664.03	ddb1	paf1	-	SPAC664.03	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sadeghi L (2015)	26518661	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2334999	2539481	2539726	276044	276278	SPCC622.16c	SPBC13E7.08c	epe1	leo1	kdm2	SPBC13E7.08c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sadeghi L (2015)	26518661	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2335000	2539481	2543560	276044	279976	SPCC622.16c	SPAC664.03	epe1	paf1	kdm2	SPAC664.03	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sadeghi L (2015)	26518661	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2335001	2539403	2539726	275968	276278	SPCC736.11	SPBC13E7.08c	ago1	leo1	csp9	SPBC13E7.08c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sadeghi L (2015)	26518661	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|silencing:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2335002	2539403	2543560	275968	279976	SPCC736.11	SPAC664.03	ago1	paf1	csp9	SPAC664.03	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sadeghi L (2015)	26518661	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|silencing:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2335003	2539726	2542207	276278	278682	SPBC13E7.08c	SPAC17H9.10c	leo1	ddb1	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sadeghi L (2015)	26518661	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue	deleting ddb1 in the leo1-null background suppressed the histone turnover reduction in leo1 mutants	-	BIOGRID
2335004	2542207	2542170	278682	278645	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC17G8.13c	ddb1	mst2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sadeghi L (2015)	26518661	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2335005	2541514	2539920	278015	276464	SPAC2E1P5.04c	SPBC119.08	cwg2	pmk1	orb7	spm1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Doi A (2015)	25651781	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell wall morphology|septum formation	-	-	BIOGRID
2335006	2539920	3361476	276464	280552	SPBC119.08	SPAC16A10.04	pmk1	rho4	spm1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Doi A (2015)	25651781	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology|septum formation	the vic phenotype in rho4/pmk1 and rho5/pmk1 double mutant cells was enhanced as compared with those shown in each single mutant	-	BIOGRID
2335007	2539920	2542013	276464	278496	SPBC119.08	SPAC20H4.11c	pmk1	rho5	spm1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Doi A (2015)	25651781	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cellular morphology|septum formation	the vic phenotype in rho4/pmk1 and rho5/pmk1 double mutant cells was enhanced as compared with those shown in each single mutant	-	BIOGRID
2335008	2542293	3361476	278761	280552	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC16A10.04	pck1	rho4	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Doi A (2015)	25651781	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2335009	2542293	2542013	278761	278496	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC20H4.11c	pck1	rho5	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Doi A (2015)	25651781	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2335010	2542293	2541612	278761	278109	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC1F7.04	pck1	rho1	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Doi A (2015)	25651781	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2335011	2539649	3361476	276204	280552	SPBC12D12.04c	SPAC16A10.04	pck2	rho4	pkc1|sts6	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Doi A (2015)	25651781	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2335012	2539649	2542013	276204	278496	SPBC12D12.04c	SPAC20H4.11c	pck2	rho5	pkc1|sts6	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Doi A (2015)	25651781	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2335013	2539649	2541612	276204	278109	SPBC12D12.04c	SPAC1F7.04	pck2	rho1	pkc1|sts6	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Doi A (2015)	25651781	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2335014	2540348	2541620	276877	278117	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC2G11.12	exo1	rqh1	mut2	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Osman F (2016)	26957021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	camptothecin (CHEBI:27656)|double mutants show a loss of DSB resection	-	BIOGRID
2335015	2543580	2541620	279995	278117	SPAC644.14c	SPAC2G11.12	rad51	rqh1	rhp51	hus2|rad12|rec9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Osman F (2016)	26957021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:wild type	deletion of exo1 and rqh1 suppresses the increase in deletions seen in a rad51 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2335016	2543580	2540348	279995	276877	SPAC644.14c	SPBC29A10.05	rad51	exo1	rhp51	mut2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Osman F (2016)	26957021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:wild type	deletion of exo1 and rqh1 suppresses the increase in deletions seen in a rad51 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2335017	2541620	2540348	278117	276877	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC29A10.05	rqh1	exo1	hus2|rad12|rec9	mut2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Osman F (2016)	26957021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	UV resistance:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	the hyper-sensitivity to UV of a rqh1-null mutant was partially suppressed by deleting exo1	-	BIOGRID
2335091	2540437	2542276	276965	278745	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC17H9.16	mmb1	tom22	mug164	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Li T (2015)	26046468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitochondrial distribution:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2335092	2540437	2542276	276965	278745	SPBC25B2.07c	SPAC17H9.16	mmb1	tom22	mug164	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Li T (2015)	26046468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis	-	-	BIOGRID
2335093	2540541	2539174	277068	275745	SPBC1A4.03c	SPCC24B10.08c	top2	ada2	ptr11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335094	2540541	2542513	277068	278971	SPBC1A4.03c	SPAC1952.05	top2	gcn5	ptr11	kat2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335095	2540541	2540436	277068	276964	SPBC1A4.03c	SPBC28F2.10c	top2	ngg1	ptr11	ada3|kap1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335096	2540541	2542854	277068	279300	SPBC1A4.03c	SPAC144.02	top2	iec1	ptr11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335097	2540541	2542665	277068	279118	SPBC1A4.03c	SPAC10F6.08c	top2	nht10	ptr11	nht1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335098	2540541	2541496	277068	277998	SPBC1A4.03c	SPAC23D3.09	top2	arp42	ptr11	arp4	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335099	2540541	2540749	277068	277271	SPBC1A4.03c	SPBC4B4.03	top2	rsc1	ptr11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335100	2540541	2539999	277068	276543	SPBC1A4.03c	SPBC1734.15	top2	rsc4	ptr11	brd1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335101	2540541	2542749	277068	279199	SPBC1A4.03c	SPAC15A10.03c	top2	rad54	ptr11	rhp54	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335102	2540541	2543685	277068	280099	SPBC1A4.03c	SPAC3C7.03c	top2	rad55	ptr11	rhp55	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)|minimal synthetic growth defect	-	BIOGRID
2335103	2540541	2539226	277068	275796	SPBC1A4.03c	SPCC16C4.20c	top2	SPCC16C4.20c	ptr11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335104	2540541	2542418	277068	278881	SPBC1A4.03c	SPAC1805.07c	top2	dad2	ptr11	hos2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335105	2540541	3361558	277068	280634	SPBC1A4.03c	SPAC14C4.16	top2	dad3	ptr11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335106	2540541	2539507	277068	276070	SPBC1A4.03c	SPCC417.02	top2	dad5	ptr11	hos3|hsk3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335107	2540541	2540249	277068	276781	SPBC1A4.03c	SPBC32F12.08c	top2	duo1	ptr11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335108	2540541	5802726	277068	857864	SPBC1A4.03c	SPCC1223.15c	top2	spc19	ptr11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335109	2540541	2540105	277068	276642	SPBC1A4.03c	SPBC106.04	top2	ada1	ptr11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335110	2540541	2538913	277068	275490	SPBC1A4.03c	SPCC31H12.08c	top2	ccr4	ptr11	SPCC5E4.02c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335111	2540541	2540352	277068	276881	SPBC1A4.03c	SPBC215.03c	top2	csn1	ptr11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335112	2540541	3361420	277068	280496	SPBC1A4.03c	SPAPB17E12.04c	top2	csn2	ptr11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335113	2540541	2541853	277068	278344	SPBC1A4.03c	SPAC2F3.11	top2	SPAC2F3.11	ptr11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335114	2540541	2543235	277068	279663	SPBC1A4.03c	SPAC56F8.04c	top2	ppt1	ptr11	coq2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335115	2540541	2541625	277068	278121	SPBC1A4.03c	SPAC1687.12c	top2	coq4	ptr11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335116	2540541	2539672	277068	276227	SPBC1A4.03c	SPBC146.12	top2	coq6	ptr11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335117	2540541	2541402	277068	277911	SPBC1A4.03c	SPBPJ4664.01	top2	dps1	ptr11	SPBPJ694.01|dps	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)|minimal synthetic growth defect	-	BIOGRID
2335118	2540541	2543361	277068	279783	SPBC1A4.03c	SPAC823.10c	top2	SPAC823.10c	ptr11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335119	2540541	2539860	277068	276407	SPBC1A4.03c	SPBC1604.02c	top2	ppr1	ptr11	ppr11	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335120	2540541	2541262	277068	277776	SPBC1A4.03c	SPBC947.14c	top2	cbp6	ptr11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)|minimal synthetic growth defect	-	BIOGRID
2335121	2540541	2538939	277068	275514	SPBC1A4.03c	SPCC1672.04c	top2	SPCC1672.04c	ptr11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335122	2540541	2538806	277068	275387	SPBC1A4.03c	SPCC1840.09	top2	SPCC1840.09	ptr11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335123	2540541	2540063	277068	276601	SPBC1A4.03c	SPBC106.05c	top2	tim11	ptr11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)|minimal synthetic growth defect	-	BIOGRID
2335124	2540541	2541771	277068	278265	SPBC1A4.03c	SPAC23H3.06	top2	apl6	ptr11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335125	2540541	2539077	277068	275649	SPBC1A4.03c	SPCC1739.14	top2	npp106	ptr11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335126	2540541	2538709	277068	275293	SPBC1A4.03c	SPCC663.03	top2	pmd1	ptr11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335127	2540541	2538923	277068	275500	SPBC1A4.03c	SPCC18.02	top2	SPCC18.02	ptr11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335128	2540541	2539291	277068	275859	SPBC1A4.03c	SPCC757.10	top2	vph2	ptr11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335129	2540541	2539462	277068	276025	SPBC1A4.03c	SPCC777.13	top2	vps35	ptr11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335130	2540541	2540886	277068	277403	SPBC1A4.03c	SPBC4F6.10	top2	vps901	ptr11	vps9a	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335131	2540541	2539974	277068	276518	SPBC1A4.03c	SPBC32H8.07	top2	git5	ptr11	gpb1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335132	2540541	2539737	277068	276289	SPBC1A4.03c	SPBC16A3.07c	top2	nrm1	ptr11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335133	2540541	2538906	277068	275483	SPBC1A4.03c	SPCC1259.03	top2	rpa12	ptr11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335134	2540541	2538775	277068	275357	SPBC1A4.03c	SPCC23B6.05c	top2	ssb3	ptr11	rpa3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335135	2540541	2543084	277068	279517	SPBC1A4.03c	SPAC31G5.19	top2	abo1	ptr11	SPAC31G5.19	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335136	2540541	2543619	277068	280033	SPBC1A4.03c	SPAC4F10.04	top2	ypa1	ptr11	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335137	2540541	2540309	277068	276839	SPBC1A4.03c	SPBC21B10.13c	top2	yox1	ptr11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335138	2540541	2543402	277068	279824	SPBC1A4.03c	SPAC630.14c	top2	tup12	ptr11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335139	2540541	2542278	277068	278747	SPBC1A4.03c	SPAC17G8.07	top2	yaf9	ptr11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335140	2540541	2542955	277068	279395	SPBC1A4.03c	SPAC11E3.12	top2	SPAC11E3.12	ptr11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)|minimal synthetic growth defect	-	BIOGRID
2335141	2540541	2542056	277068	278535	SPBC1A4.03c	SPAC6G9.14	top2	SPAC6G9.14	ptr11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)|minimal synthetic growth defect	-	BIOGRID
2335142	2540541	2543372	277068	279794	SPBC1A4.03c	SPAPB1A10.09	top2	ase1	ptr11	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)|minimal synthetic growth defect	-	BIOGRID
2335143	2540541	2540528	277068	277056	SPBC1A4.03c	SPBC18H10.04c	top2	sce3	ptr11	tif48	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)|minimal synthetic growth defect	-	BIOGRID
2335144	2540541	2542669	277068	279122	SPBC1A4.03c	SPAC29B12.08	top2	clr5	ptr11	SPAC29B12.08	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335145	2543387	2540541	279809	277068	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC1A4.03c	mcl1	top2	slr3	ptr11	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335146	2540443	2540541	276971	277068	SPBC2D10.16	SPBC1A4.03c	mhf1	top2	-	ptr11	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335147	2540731	2540541	277254	277068	SPBC18H10.02	SPBC1A4.03c	lcf1	top2	-	ptr11	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335148	2541422	2540541	277928	277068	SPAC2F7.07c	SPBC1A4.03c	cph2	top2	rco1	ptr11	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335149	2539658	2540541	276213	277068	SPBC1105.17	SPBC1A4.03c	cnp1	top2	sim2	ptr11	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nguyen TT (2015)	25669599	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	doxorubicin (CHEBI:28748)	-	BIOGRID
2335150	2542482	2539645	278942	276200	SPAP8A3.06	SPBC146.07	uaf2	prp2	SPAP8A3.06|ods2	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Yoshida H (2015)	26215567	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2335153	2539540	2541977	276102	278462	SPCC736.12c	SPAC5D6.01	mmi1	rps2202	-	rps15a-2|rps22-2	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Kilchert C (2015)	26670050	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	CRAC	-	BIOGRID
2335154	2539540	2541383	276102	277894	SPCC736.12c	SPBP8B7.16c	mmi1	dbp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Kilchert C (2015)	26670050	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	CRAC	-	BIOGRID
2335155	2539540	2538743	276102	275326	SPCC736.12c	SPCC1906.01	mmi1	mpg1	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Kilchert C (2015)	26670050	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	CRAC	-	BIOGRID
2335156	2539540	2539743	276102	276295	SPCC736.12c	SPBC16A3.08c	mmi1	oga1	-	SPBC16A3.08c	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Kilchert C (2015)	26670050	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	CRAC	-	BIOGRID
2335157	2539540	2540880	276102	277397	SPCC736.12c	SPBC582.03	mmi1	cdc13	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Kilchert C (2015)	26670050	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	CRAC	-	BIOGRID
2335158	2539540	2541146	276102	277661	SPCC736.12c	SPBC660.16	mmi1	SPBC660.16	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Kilchert C (2015)	26670050	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	CRAC	-	BIOGRID
2335159	2539540	2543298	276102	279723	SPCC736.12c	SPAC6B12.15	mmi1	cpc2	-	rkp1	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Kilchert C (2015)	26670050	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	CRAC	-	BIOGRID
2335160	2539540	2542937	276102	279378	SPCC736.12c	SPAC10F6.03c	mmi1	cts1	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Kilchert C (2015)	26670050	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	CRAC	-	BIOGRID
2335161	2539540	2542029	276102	278511	SPCC736.12c	SPAC8E11.02c	mmi1	rad24	-	anr5|sam4	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Kilchert C (2015)	26670050	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	CRAC	-	BIOGRID
2335162	2539540	2540769	276102	277289	SPCC736.12c	SPBC19G7.17	mmi1	SPBC19G7.17	-	SPBC36B7.01	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Kilchert C (2015)	26670050	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	CRAC	-	BIOGRID
2335163	2539540	2539956	276102	276500	SPCC736.12c	SPBC16E9.11c	mmi1	pub3	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Kilchert C (2015)	26670050	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	CRAC	-	BIOGRID
2335164	2539540	2538893	276102	275471	SPCC736.12c	SPCC18.14c	mmi1	rpp0	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Kilchert C (2015)	26670050	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	CRAC	-	BIOGRID
2335165	2539540	2540910	276102	277426	SPCC736.12c	SPBC577.02	mmi1	rpl3801	-	rpl38-1	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Kilchert C (2015)	26670050	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	CRAC	-	BIOGRID
2335166	2539540	2542414	276102	278878	SPCC736.12c	SPAC6F6.16c	mmi1	tpz1	-	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Kilchert C (2015)	26670050	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	CRAC	-	BIOGRID
2335167	2539540	2543548	276102	279965	SPCC736.12c	SPAC664.06	mmi1	rlp7	-	rpl7|rpl7-3|rpl703	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Kilchert C (2015)	26670050	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	CRAC	-	BIOGRID
2335168	2539540	2542379	276102	278843	SPCC736.12c	SPAC1687.17c	mmi1	SPAC1687.17c	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Kilchert C (2015)	26670050	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	CRAC	-	BIOGRID
2335169	2539540	2539886	276102	276432	SPCC736.12c	SPBC1734.10c	mmi1	SPBC1734.10c	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Kilchert C (2015)	26670050	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	CRAC	-	BIOGRID
2335170	2539540	2541385	276102	277896	SPCC736.12c	SPBP8B7.15c	mmi1	mpe1	-	SPBP8B7.15c	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Kilchert C (2015)	26670050	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	CRAC	-	BIOGRID
2335171	2539540	2538943	276102	275518	SPCC736.12c	SPCC1795.07	mmi1	SPCC1795.07	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Kilchert C (2015)	26670050	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	CRAC	-	BIOGRID
2335172	2539540	2538895	276102	275473	SPCC736.12c	SPCC830.09c	mmi1	pop5	-	SPCC830.09c	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Kilchert C (2015)	26670050	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	CRAC	-	BIOGRID
2335173	2539540	2542368	276102	278832	SPCC736.12c	SPAC1783.06c	mmi1	atg12	-	apg12	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Kilchert C (2015)	26670050	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	CRAC	-	BIOGRID
2335174	2539540	2540633	276102	277159	SPCC736.12c	SPBC21D10.12	mmi1	hob1	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Kilchert C (2015)	26670050	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	CRAC	-	BIOGRID
2335175	2539540	2539689	276102	276244	SPCC736.12c	SPBC1861.03	mmi1	mak10	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Kilchert C (2015)	26670050	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	CRAC	-	BIOGRID
2335176	2539540	2543124	276102	279556	SPCC736.12c	SPAC3A11.06	mmi1	mvp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Kilchert C (2015)	26670050	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	CRAC	-	BIOGRID
2337914	2540735	2541633	277258	278129	SPBC83.03c	SPAC664.01c	tas3	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Stunnenberg R (2015)	26438724	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	-	-	BIOGRID
2340230	2540112	2540024	276649	276568	SPBC11C11.02	SPBP4H10.04	imp2	ppb1	-	SPBC1346.01c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kita A (2015)	25580011	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2340233	2539817	2542513	276367	278971	SPBC146.03c	SPAC1952.05	cut3	gcn5	smc4	kat2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Toselli-Mollereau E (2016)	27266525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
2340234	2540541	2542513	277068	278971	SPBC1A4.03c	SPAC1952.05	top2	gcn5	ptr11	kat2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Toselli-Mollereau E (2016)	27266525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
2340237	2539817	2538744	276367	275327	SPBC146.03c	SPCC306.03c	cut3	cnd2	smc4	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Toselli-Mollereau E (2016)	27266525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2340238	2539817	2539174	276367	275745	SPBC146.03c	SPCC24B10.08c	cut3	ada2	smc4	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Toselli-Mollereau E (2016)	27266525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
2340239	2539817	2540436	276367	276964	SPBC146.03c	SPBC28F2.10c	cut3	ngg1	smc4	ada3|kap1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Toselli-Mollereau E (2016)	27266525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
2340240	2539817	2542170	276367	278645	SPBC146.03c	SPAC17G8.13c	cut3	mst2	smc4	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Toselli-Mollereau E (2016)	27266525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	genetic complex|triple mutants show reduced viability compared to a cutz/gcn5 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
2340241	2542513	2542170	278971	278645	SPAC1952.05	SPAC17G8.13c	gcn5	mst2	kat2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Toselli-Mollereau E (2016)	27266525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	genetic complex|triple mutants show reduced viability compared to a cutz/gcn5 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
2340242	2542513	2542170	278971	278645	SPAC1952.05	SPAC17G8.13c	gcn5	mst2	kat2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Toselli-Mollereau E (2016)	27266525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation|protein/peptide modification	double mutants show enhanced defects in nucleosome location and modification	-	BIOGRID
2340772	2539649	2540019	276204	276563	SPBC12D12.04c	SPBC1685.01	pck2	pmp1	pkc1|sts6	dsp1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kanda Y (2016)	27451356	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2340773	2539649	2539237	276204	275807	SPBC12D12.04c	SPCC24B10.13	pck2	skb5	pkc1|sts6	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kanda Y (2016)	27451356	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2340774	2542773	2540019	279222	276563	SPAC16.01	SPBC1685.01	rho2	pmp1	-	dsp1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kanda Y (2016)	27451356	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of the skb5 and pmp1 significantly reduced the toxicity of Rho2 overproduction	-	BIOGRID
2340775	2542773	2539237	279222	275807	SPAC16.01	SPCC24B10.13	rho2	skb5	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kanda Y (2016)	27451356	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	overexpression of the skb5 and pmp1 significantly reduced the toxicity of Rho2 overproduction	-	BIOGRID
2340776	2540919	2540019	277435	276563	SPBC543.07	SPBC1685.01	pek1	pmp1	mkk1|skh1	dsp1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kanda Y (2016)	27451356	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	the toxicity induced by Pek1DD overproduction was suppressed by the expression of Pmp1	-	BIOGRID
2340777	2539237	2542175	275807	278650	SPCC24B10.13	SPAC1F3.02c	skb5	mkh1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kanda Y (2016)	27451356	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2340778	2539237	2539495	275807	276058	SPCC24B10.13	SPCC4F11.02	skb5	ptc1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kanda Y (2016)	27451356	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2340779	2539495	2539237	276058	275807	SPCC4F11.02	SPCC24B10.13	ptc1	skb5	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kanda Y (2016)	27451356	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2340780	2539495	2540019	276058	276563	SPCC4F11.02	SPBC1685.01	ptc1	pmp1	-	dsp1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kanda Y (2016)	27451356	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2340781	2542175	2539237	278650	275807	SPAC1F3.02c	SPCC24B10.13	mkh1	skb5	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kanda Y (2016)	27451356	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2340782	2542175	2540919	278650	277435	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC543.07	mkh1	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kanda Y (2016)	27451356	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2340783	2542175	2539649	278650	276204	SPAC1F3.02c	SPBC12D12.04c	mkh1	pck2	-	pkc1|sts6	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kanda Y (2016)	27451356	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2340784	2539237	2542175	275807	278650	SPCC24B10.13	SPAC1F3.02c	skb5	mkh1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Kanda Y (2016)	27451356	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2340785	2540618	2540927	277144	277443	SPBC3D6.11c	SPBC365.06	slx8	pmt3	-	smt3|ubl2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kohler JB (2015)	26537787	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	expression of a Sumo mutant partially alleviated the growth defect seen in an slx8	-	BIOGRID
2340807	2540580	2540584	277106	277110	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC28F2.07	ran1	sfr1	pat1	dds20|mug13	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Lino Y (1985)	25864229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2347595	2538951	2542652	275525	279106	SPCC297.03	SPAC1687.15	ssp1	gsk3	-	skp1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size	deletion of gsk3 exacerbates the elongated phenotype of ssp1-null cell	-	BIOGRID
2359380	2542652	2541536	279106	278036	SPAC1687.15	SPAC1071.02	gsk3	mms19	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.264	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359381	2542652	2542992	279106	279430	SPAC1687.15	SPAC1071.09c	gsk3	SPAC1071.09c	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.226	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359382	2542652	2543009	279106	279447	SPAC1687.15	SPAC10F6.06	gsk3	vip1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.283	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359383	2542652	2541628	279106	278124	SPAC1687.15	SPAC110.02	gsk3	pds5	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.199	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359384	2542652	2541877	279106	278367	SPAC1687.15	SPAC11E3.05	gsk3	sea3	skp1	SPAC11E3.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.456	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359385	2542652	3361461	279106	280537	SPAC1687.15	SPAC11H11.01	gsk3	sst6	skp1	cps23	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.233	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359386	2542652	2542661	279106	279114	SPAC1687.15	SPAC1250.05	gsk3	rpl3002	skp1	rpl30|rpl30-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.164	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359387	2542652	2543025	279106	279461	SPAC1687.15	SPAC1296.02	gsk3	cox4	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.364	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359388	2542652	2543049	279106	279484	SPAC1687.15	SPAC1296.04	gsk3	mug65	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.273	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359389	2542652	2542950	279106	279390	SPAC1687.15	SPAC12B10.03	gsk3	bun62	skp1	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.157	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359390	2542652	2542967	279106	279407	SPAC1687.15	SPAC12B10.12c	gsk3	rhp41	skp1	rhp4a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.292	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359391	2542652	2543092	279106	279525	SPAC1687.15	SPAC1327.01c	gsk3	SPAC1327.01c	skp1	SPAC1783.09c|SPAC18G6.16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.471	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359392	2542652	2542548	279106	279005	SPAC1687.15	SPAC13A11.03	gsk3	mcp7	skp1	mug32|mnd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.325	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359393	2542652	2542365	279106	278829	SPAC1687.15	SPAC13C5.03	gsk3	tht1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.712	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359394	2542652	2542817	279106	279264	SPAC1687.15	SPAC13G6.02c	gsk3	rps101	skp1	rps1-1|rps3a-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.197	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359395	2542652	2542895	279106	279339	SPAC1687.15	SPAC13G6.10c	gsk3	asl1	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.183	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359396	2542652	2542908	279106	279352	SPAC1687.15	SPAC13G7.03	gsk3	upf3	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.344	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359397	2542652	2542838	279106	279284	SPAC1687.15	SPAC13G7.11	gsk3	SPAC13G7.11	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.795	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359398	2542652	2542839	279106	279285	SPAC1687.15	SPAC13G7.12c	gsk3	SPAC13G7.12c	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.272	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359399	2542652	2542862	279106	279308	SPAC1687.15	SPAC140.03	gsk3	arb1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.19	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359400	2542652	2542854	279106	279300	SPAC1687.15	SPAC144.02	gsk3	iec1	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.459	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359401	2542652	2542855	279106	279301	SPAC1687.15	SPAC144.04c	gsk3	spe1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.176	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359402	2542652	2542857	279106	279303	SPAC1687.15	SPAC144.06	gsk3	apl5	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.179	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359403	2542652	2542883	279106	279328	SPAC1687.15	SPAC1486.04c	gsk3	alm1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.205	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359404	2542652	3361558	279106	280634	SPAC1687.15	SPAC14C4.16	gsk3	dad3	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.221	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359405	2542652	2541698	279106	278194	SPAC1687.15	SPAC1556.05c	gsk3	cgr1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.427	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359406	2542652	2541598	279106	278095	SPAC1687.15	SPAC16.05c	gsk3	sfp1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.222	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359407	2542652	2542750	279106	279200	SPAC1687.15	SPAC1635.01	gsk3	SPAC1635.01	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.153	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359408	2542652	2542311	279106	278777	SPAC1687.15	SPAC16A10.05c	gsk3	dad1	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.159	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359409	2542652	2542338	279106	278804	SPAC1687.15	SPAC16E8.01	gsk3	shd1	skp1	sla1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.173	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359410	2542652	2542343	279106	278809	SPAC1687.15	SPAC16E8.18	gsk3	SPAC16E8.18	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.198	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359411	2542652	2542358	279106	278823	SPAC1687.15	SPAC1782.09c	gsk3	clp1	skp1	flp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.166	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359412	2542652	2542359	279106	278824	SPAC1687.15	SPAC1782.11	gsk3	met14	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.594	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359413	2542652	2542362	279106	278826	SPAC1687.15	SPAC1783.02c	gsk3	vps66	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.201	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359414	2542652	2542136	279106	278612	SPAC1687.15	SPAC17A2.06c	gsk3	vps8	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.529	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359415	2542652	2542268	279106	278737	SPAC1687.15	SPAC17A5.07c	gsk3	ulp2	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.693	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359416	2542652	2542189	279106	278664	SPAC1687.15	SPAC17A5.09c	gsk3	glc9	skp1	SPAC17A5.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.19	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359417	2542652	2542202	279106	278677	SPAC1687.15	SPAC17C9.15c	gsk3	SPAC17C9.15c	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.16	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359418	2542652	2542380	279106	278844	SPAC1687.15	SPAC17G6.04c	gsk3	cpp1	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.218	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359419	2542652	2542273	279106	278742	SPAC1687.15	SPAC17H9.13c	gsk3	SPAC17H9.13c	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.229	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359420	2542652	2542418	279106	278881	SPAC1687.15	SPAC1805.07c	gsk3	dad2	skp1	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.257	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359421	2542652	2542331	279106	278797	SPAC1687.15	SPAC1834.05	gsk3	alg9	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.294	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359422	2542652	2542560	279106	279016	SPAC1687.15	SPAC1851.02	gsk3	slc1	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.18	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359423	2542652	2542544	279106	279001	SPAC1687.15	SPAC18G6.10	gsk3	lem2	skp1	heh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.243	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359424	2542652	2542132	279106	278608	SPAC1687.15	SPAC1952.16	gsk3	rga9	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.199	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359425	2542652	2542522	279106	278980	SPAC1687.15	SPAC19A8.03	gsk3	ymr1	skp1	SPAC19A8.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.66	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359426	2542652	2542403	279106	278867	SPAC1687.15	SPAC19A8.05c	gsk3	sst4	skp1	vps27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.528	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359427	2542652	2542606	279106	279060	SPAC1687.15	SPAC19B12.10	gsk3	sst2	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.565	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359428	2542652	2542519	279106	278977	SPAC1687.15	SPAC19G12.08	gsk3	scs7	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.192	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359429	2542652	2542244	279106	278714	SPAC1687.15	SPAC19G12.13c	gsk3	poz1	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.199	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359430	2542652	2542533	279106	278991	SPAC1687.15	SPAC1B1.02c	gsk3	SPAC1B1.02c	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.229	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359431	2542652	2542541	279106	278998	SPAC1687.15	SPAC1B3.03c	gsk3	wis2	skp1	cyp5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.23	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359432	2542652	2542518	279106	278976	SPAC1687.15	SPAC1B3.16c	gsk3	vht1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.192	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359433	2542652	2542468	279106	278929	SPAC1687.15	SPAC1D4.09c	gsk3	rtf2	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.161	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359434	2542652	2542434	279106	278896	SPAC1687.15	SPAC1F12.06c	gsk3	SPAC1F12.06c	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.422	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359435	2542652	2541461	279106	277963	SPAC1687.15	SPAC1F3.09	gsk3	mug161	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.343	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359436	2542652	2541432	279106	277937	SPAC1687.15	SPAC1F5.05c	gsk3	mso1	skp1	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.227	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359437	2542652	2541627	279106	278123	SPAC1687.15	SPAC1F5.08c	gsk3	yam8	skp1	ehs1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.159	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359438	2542652	2541558	279106	278057	SPAC1687.15	SPAC1F7.08	gsk3	fio1	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.602	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359439	2542652	3361548	279106	280624	SPAC1687.15	SPAC20G8.10c	gsk3	atg6	skp1	SPAC3A12.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.631	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359440	2542652	2541911	279106	278401	SPAC1687.15	SPAC212.04c	gsk3	SPAC212.04c	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.462	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359441	2542652	2541909	279106	278399	SPAC1687.15	SPAC227.01c	gsk3	erd1	skp1	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.248	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359442	2542652	2541494	279106	277996	SPAC1687.15	SPAC227.15	gsk3	SPAC227.15	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.481	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359443	2542652	2541517	279106	278018	SPAC1687.15	SPAC22A12.03c	gsk3	csn4	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.194	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359444	2542652	2541803	279106	278294	SPAC1687.15	SPAC22E12.04	gsk3	ccs1	skp1	pccs	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.229	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359445	2542652	2541875	279106	278365	SPAC1687.15	SPAC22F3.06c	gsk3	lon1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.899	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359446	2542652	2541878	279106	278368	SPAC1687.15	SPAC22F3.07c	gsk3	atp20	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.227	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359447	2542652	2541786	279106	278278	SPAC1687.15	SPAC22F3.08c	gsk3	rok1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.402	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359448	2542652	2541871	279106	278361	SPAC1687.15	SPAC22F3.09c	gsk3	res2	skp1	mcs1|pct1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.17	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359449	2542652	2541764	279106	278258	SPAC1687.15	SPAC22F3.12c	gsk3	rgs1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.664	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359450	2542652	2541439	279106	277944	SPAC1687.15	SPAC22F8.11	gsk3	plc1	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.611	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359451	2542652	2541742	279106	278236	SPAC1687.15	SPAC22H10.09	gsk3	SPAC22H10.09	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.165	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359452	2542652	2542022	279106	278505	SPAC1687.15	SPAC23A1.03	gsk3	apt1	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.205	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359453	2542652	2542012	279106	278495	SPAC1687.15	SPAC23C11.02c	gsk3	rps23	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.207	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359454	2542652	2542032	279106	278514	SPAC1687.15	SPAC23C11.04c	gsk3	pnk1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.153	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359455	2542652	2542061	279106	278539	SPAC1687.15	SPAC23C11.10	gsk3	mpn1	skp1	SPAC23C11.10|usb1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.159	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359456	2542652	2541496	279106	277998	SPAC1687.15	SPAC23D3.09	gsk3	arp42	skp1	arp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.169	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359457	2542652	2541522	279106	278023	SPAC1687.15	SPAC23E2.01	gsk3	fep1	skp1	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.175	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359458	2542652	2541771	279106	278265	SPAC1687.15	SPAC23H3.06	gsk3	apl6	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.188	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359459	2542652	2541872	279106	278362	SPAC1687.15	SPAC23H4.10c	gsk3	thi4	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.464	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359460	2542652	2541560	279106	278059	SPAC1687.15	SPAC24B11.12c	gsk3	SPAC24B11.12c	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.237	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359461	2542652	2542629	279106	279083	SPAC1687.15	SPAC24H6.07	gsk3	rps901	skp1	rps9-1|rps9a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.218	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359462	2542652	2542635	279106	279089	SPAC1687.15	SPAC24H6.09	gsk3	gef1	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.256	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359463	2542652	2542625	279106	279079	SPAC1687.15	SPAC24H6.11c	gsk3	SPAC24H6.11c	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.253	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359464	2542652	2542712	279106	279165	SPAC1687.15	SPAC25B8.17	gsk3	SPAC25B8.17	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.157	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359465	2542652	2542716	279106	279169	SPAC1687.15	SPAC25H1.07	gsk3	emc1	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.419	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359466	2542652	2542093	279106	278570	SPAC1687.15	SPAC26A3.04	gsk3	rpl2002	skp1	rpl20|rpl20-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.213	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359467	2542652	2542682	279106	279135	SPAC1687.15	SPAC26A3.09c	gsk3	rga2	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.202	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359468	2542652	2542073	279106	278550	SPAC1687.15	SPAC26F1.01	gsk3	sec74	skp1	SPAPJ691.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.168	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359469	2542652	2542700	279106	279153	SPAC1687.15	SPAC26H5.08c	gsk3	bgl2	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.156	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359470	2542652	2542283	279106	278751	SPAC1687.15	SPAC27F1.08	gsk3	pdt1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.367	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359471	2542652	2542639	279106	279093	SPAC1687.15	SPAC2C4.05	gsk3	cor1	skp1	SPAC2C4.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.254	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359472	2542652	2541964	279106	278450	SPAC1687.15	SPAC2F3.08	gsk3	sut1	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.191	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359473	2542652	2541672	279106	278168	SPAC1687.15	SPAC2F3.15	gsk3	lsk1	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.409	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359474	2542652	2541901	279106	278391	SPAC1687.15	SPAC2F7.02c	gsk3	SPAC2F7.02c	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.151	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359475	2542652	2541889	279106	278379	SPAC1687.15	SPAC2F7.03c	gsk3	pom1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.152	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359476	2542652	2542458	279106	278919	SPAC1687.15	SPAC30.02c	gsk3	SPAC30.02c	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.611	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359477	2542652	2541465	279106	277967	SPAC1687.15	SPAC30C2.02	gsk3	mmd1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.276	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359478	2542652	2542590	279106	279045	SPAC1687.15	SPAC30C2.06c	gsk3	dml1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.708	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359479	2542652	2542940	279106	279381	SPAC1687.15	SPAC31A2.12	gsk3	SPAC31A2.12	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.174	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359480	2542652	2542222	279106	278695	SPAC1687.15	SPAC31G5.18c	gsk3	sde2	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.446	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359481	2542652	2543173	279106	279603	SPAC1687.15	SPAC323.01c	gsk3	pos5	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.248	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359482	2542652	2542660	279106	279113	SPAC1687.15	SPAC328.03	gsk3	tps1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.44	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359483	2542652	2542059	279106	278537	SPAC1687.15	SPAC328.06	gsk3	ubp2	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.566	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359484	2542652	2543116	279106	279548	SPAC1687.15	SPAC3A11.08	gsk3	pcu4	skp1	Cul-4|cul4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.577	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359485	2542652	2543108	279106	279540	SPAC1687.15	SPAC3A12.13c	gsk3	SPAC3A12.13c	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.467	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359486	2542652	2543082	279106	279515	SPAC1687.15	SPAC3C7.08c	gsk3	elf1	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.153	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359487	2542652	2543193	279106	279622	SPAC1687.15	SPAC3F10.11c	gsk3	abc2	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.373	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359488	2542652	2543164	279106	279595	SPAC1687.15	SPAC3G6.06c	gsk3	rad2	skp1	fen1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.221	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359489	2542652	2543643	279106	280057	SPAC1687.15	SPAC3G9.07c	gsk3	hos2	skp1	hda1|phd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.166	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359490	2542652	2543375	279106	279797	SPAC1687.15	SPAC3H1.08c	gsk3	SPAC3H1.08c	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.16	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359491	2542652	2543637	279106	280051	SPAC1687.15	SPAC3H8.02	gsk3	csr102	skp1	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.558	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359492	2542652	2543636	279106	280050	SPAC1687.15	SPAC3H8.08c	gsk3	SPAC3H8.08c	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.187	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359493	2542652	2543444	279106	279864	SPAC1687.15	SPAC458.05	gsk3	pik3	skp1	vps34	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.759	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359494	2542652	2543616	279106	280030	SPAC1687.15	SPAC4A8.09c	gsk3	cwf21	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.152	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359495	2542652	2543514	279106	279932	SPAC1687.15	SPAC4D7.03	gsk3	pop2	skp1	sud1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.185	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359496	2542652	2543619	279106	280033	SPAC1687.15	SPAC4F10.04	gsk3	ypa1	skp1	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.15	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359497	2542652	2543521	279106	279939	SPAC1687.15	SPAC4F8.01	gsk3	did4	skp1	SPAC644.03c|vps2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.187	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359498	2542652	2543380	279106	279802	SPAC1687.15	SPAC4G9.16c	gsk3	rpl901	skp1	rpl9-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.172	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359499	2542652	2543652	279106	280066	SPAC1687.15	SPAC4H3.03c	gsk3	SPAC4H3.03c	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.158	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359500	2542652	3361483	279106	280559	SPAC1687.15	SPAC513.01c	gsk3	eft201	skp1	SPAPYUK71.04c|eft2-1|etf2|eft2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.178	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359501	2542652	2542218	279106	278692	SPAC1687.15	SPAC589.09	gsk3	csr101	skp1	SPAC589.09	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.19	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359502	2542652	2541925	279106	278413	SPAC1687.15	SPAC5D6.05	gsk3	med18	skp1	sep11|pmc6	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.675	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359503	2542652	2541543	279106	278043	SPAC1687.15	SPAC5H10.04	gsk3	SPAC5H10.04	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.306	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359504	2542652	2543431	279106	279851	SPAC1687.15	SPAC630.04c	gsk3	SPAC630.04c	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.192	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359505	2542652	2543247	279106	279675	SPAC1687.15	SPAC630.11	gsk3	vps55	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.227	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359506	2542652	2543384	279106	279806	SPAC1687.15	SPAC637.06	gsk3	gmh5	skp1	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.188	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359507	2542652	2543682	279106	280096	SPAC1687.15	SPAC637.10c	gsk3	rpn10	skp1	pus1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.183	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359508	2542652	2543678	279106	280092	SPAC1687.15	SPAC637.11	gsk3	rpm2	skp1	pah1|suv3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.395	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359509	2542652	2543217	279106	279645	SPAC1687.15	SPAC644.15	gsk3	rpp101	skp1	rpp1-1|rpa1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.195	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359510	2542652	2543566	279106	279982	SPAC1687.15	SPAC652.01	gsk3	SPAC652.01	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.156	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359511	2542652	2543563	279106	279979	SPAC1687.15	SPAC664.02c	gsk3	arp8	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.233	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359512	2542652	2543560	279106	279976	SPAC1687.15	SPAC664.03	gsk3	paf1	skp1	SPAC664.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.276	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359513	2542652	2542946	279106	279386	SPAC1687.15	SPAC6F12.03c	gsk3	fsv1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.502	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359514	2542652	2542812	279106	279259	SPAC1687.15	SPAC6F6.01	gsk3	cch1	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.436	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359515	2542652	2542157	279106	278633	SPAC1687.15	SPAC6F6.09	gsk3	eaf6	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.559	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359516	2542652	2541978	279106	278463	SPAC1687.15	SPAC6G9.12	gsk3	cfr1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.178	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359517	2542652	2542056	279106	278535	SPAC1687.15	SPAC6G9.14	gsk3	SPAC6G9.14	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.322	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359518	2542652	2541800	279106	278291	SPAC1687.15	SPAC732.02c	gsk3	SPAC732.02c	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.169	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359519	2542652	2541761	279106	278255	SPAC1687.15	SPAC7D4.12c	gsk3	SPAC7D4.12c	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.248	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359520	2542652	2543077	279106	279510	SPAC1687.15	SPAC806.04c	gsk3	SPAC806.04c	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.169	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359521	2542652	2543361	279106	279783	SPAC1687.15	SPAC823.10c	gsk3	SPAC823.10c	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.238	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359522	2542652	2543434	279106	279854	SPAC1687.15	SPAC8F11.02c	gsk3	dph3	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.385	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359523	2542652	2543655	279106	280069	SPAC1687.15	SPAC9.08c	gsk3	SPAC9.08c	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.331	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359524	2542652	2543545	279106	279962	SPAC1687.15	SPAC926.03	gsk3	rlc1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.444	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359525	2542652	2543289	279106	279714	SPAC1687.15	SPAC9E9.08	gsk3	rad26	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.273	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359526	2542652	2542873	279106	279318	SPAC1687.15	SPAC9G1.02	gsk3	wis4	skp1	wak1|wik1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.275	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359527	2542652	2542740	279106	279190	SPAC1687.15	SPAC9G1.06c	gsk3	cyk3	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.308	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359528	2542652	2542192	279106	278667	SPAC1687.15	SPAC9G1.12	gsk3	cpd1	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.219	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359529	2542652	2542498	279106	278957	SPAC1687.15	SPACUNK4.16c	gsk3	SPACUNK4.16c	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.384	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359530	2542652	2541921	279106	278410	SPAC1687.15	SPAP27G11.08c	gsk3	meu32	skp1	mug11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.179	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359531	2542652	3361399	279106	280475	SPAC1687.15	SPAPB17E12.08	gsk3	SPAPB17E12.08	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.211	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359532	2542652	2543369	279106	279791	SPAC1687.15	SPAPB1A10.07c	gsk3	SPAPB1A10.07c	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.156	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359533	2542652	2543670	279106	280084	SPAC1687.15	SPAPB1E7.06c	gsk3	eme1	skp1	mms4|slx2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.258	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359534	2542652	2543581	279106	279996	SPAC1687.15	SPAPB1E7.12	gsk3	rps602	skp1	rps6|rps6-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.391	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359535	2542652	2543419	279106	279841	SPAC1687.15	SPAPB24D3.02c	gsk3	SPAPB24D3.02c	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.166	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359536	2542652	2543305	279106	279729	SPAC1687.15	SPAPJ696.02	gsk3	lsb4	skp1	SPAPJ696.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.306	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359537	2542652	2542267	279106	278736	SPAC1687.15	SPAPYUK71.03c	gsk3	syn1	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.525	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359538	2542652	2540069	279106	276607	SPAC1687.15	SPBC106.02c	gsk3	srx1	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.524	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359539	2542652	2539781	279106	276331	SPAC1687.15	SPBC106.10	gsk3	pka1	skp1	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.299	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359540	2542652	2540175	279106	276708	SPAC1687.15	SPBC106.16	gsk3	pre6	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.284	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359541	2542652	2540070	279106	276608	SPAC1687.15	SPBC119.04	gsk3	mei3	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.223	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359542	2542652	2540061	279106	276599	SPAC1687.15	SPBC119.12	gsk3	rud3	skp1	SPBC119.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.406	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359543	2542652	2539966	279106	276510	SPAC1687.15	SPBC11B10.06	gsk3	sws1	skp1	pi005|SPACTOKYO_453.32	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.168	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359544	2542652	2539678	279106	276233	SPAC1687.15	SPBC11C11.07	gsk3	rpl1801	skp1	rpl18|rpl18-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.375	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359545	2542652	2540023	279106	276567	SPAC1687.15	SPBC11C11.10	gsk3	SPBC11C11.10	skp1	SPBC3B8.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.191	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359546	2542652	2540206	279106	276739	SPAC1687.15	SPBC1271.12	gsk3	kes1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.52	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359547	2542652	2539845	279106	276393	SPAC1687.15	SPBC12C2.02c	gsk3	ste20	skp1	ste16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.487	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359548	2542652	2540152	279106	276688	SPAC1687.15	SPBC12C2.03c	gsk3	SPBC12C2.03c	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.161	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359549	2542652	2539898	279106	276444	SPAC1687.15	SPBC12D12.07c	gsk3	trx2	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.227	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359550	2542652	2539812	279106	276362	SPAC1687.15	SPBC1347.02	gsk3	fkbp39	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.164	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359551	2542652	2539667	279106	276222	SPAC1687.15	SPBC13G1.08c	gsk3	ash2	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.386	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359552	2542652	2539673	279106	276228	SPAC1687.15	SPBC13G1.10c	gsk3	mug81	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.611	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359553	2542652	2539670	279106	276225	SPAC1687.15	SPBC13G1.12	gsk3	did2	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.271	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359554	2542652	2539986	279106	276530	SPAC1687.15	SPBC14C8.16c	gsk3	bot1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.303	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359555	2542652	2539750	279106	276302	SPAC1687.15	SPBC14F5.10c	gsk3	SPBC14F5.10c	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.366	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359556	2542652	2539722	279106	276275	SPAC1687.15	SPBC14F5.11c	gsk3	mug186	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.153	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359557	2542652	2539982	279106	276526	SPAC1687.15	SPBC1539.06	gsk3	SPBC1539.06	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.246	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359558	2542652	2539872	279106	276418	SPAC1687.15	SPBC15C4.01c	gsk3	oca3	skp1	emc2|SPBC14C8.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.977	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359559	2542652	2539911	279106	276456	SPAC1687.15	SPBC15D4.10c	gsk3	amo1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.315	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359560	2542652	2539860	279106	276407	SPAC1687.15	SPBC1604.02c	gsk3	ppr1	skp1	ppr11	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.355	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359561	2542652	2539928	279106	276472	SPAC1687.15	SPBC1604.08c	gsk3	imp1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.3	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359562	2542652	2539857	279106	276404	SPAC1687.15	SPBC1604.20c	gsk3	tea2	skp1	klp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.202	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359563	2542652	2540019	279106	276563	SPAC1687.15	SPBC1685.01	gsk3	pmp1	skp1	dsp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.227	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359564	2542652	2539934	279106	276478	SPAC1687.15	SPBC16A3.03c	gsk3	ppr7	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.197	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359565	2542652	2539737	279106	276289	SPAC1687.15	SPBC16A3.07c	gsk3	nrm1	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.565	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359566	2542652	2539743	279106	276295	SPAC1687.15	SPBC16A3.08c	gsk3	oga1	skp1	SPBC16A3.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.717	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359567	2542652	2539979	279106	276523	SPAC1687.15	SPBC16A3.17c	gsk3	SPBC16A3.17c	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.277	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359568	2542652	2539989	279106	276533	SPAC1687.15	SPBC16A3.19	gsk3	eaf7	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.296	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359569	2542652	2540026	279106	276570	SPAC1687.15	SPBC16D10.08c	gsk3	hsp104	skp1	SPBC16D10.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.209	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359570	2542652	2539921	279106	276465	SPAC1687.15	SPBC16E9.03c	gsk3	coa1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.15	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359571	2542652	2540028	279106	276572	SPAC1687.15	SPBC16E9.09c	gsk3	erp5	skp1	SPBC16E9.09c|erp6	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.226	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359572	2542652	2539706	279106	276259	SPAC1687.15	SPBC16G5.13	gsk3	ptf2	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.338	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359573	2542652	2540075	279106	276613	SPAC1687.15	SPBC16H5.06	gsk3	rip1	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.411	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359574	2542652	2540072	279106	276610	SPAC1687.15	SPBC16H5.07c	gsk3	ppa2	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.343	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359575	2542652	2539925	279106	276469	SPAC1687.15	SPBC16H5.13	gsk3	SPBC16H5.13	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.315	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359576	2542652	2539739	279106	276291	SPAC1687.15	SPBC1711.03	gsk3	aim27	skp1	emc3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.757	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359577	2542652	2539720	279106	276273	SPAC1687.15	SPBC1711.14	gsk3	rec15	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.19	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359578	2542652	2539675	279106	276230	SPAC1687.15	SPBC1718.03	gsk3	ker1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.521	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359579	2542652	2539686	279106	276241	SPAC1687.15	SPBC1734.06	gsk3	rhp18	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.215	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359580	2542652	2540055	279106	276593	SPAC1687.15	SPBC1734.08	gsk3	hse1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.328	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359581	2542652	2539765	279106	276316	SPAC1687.15	SPBC1778.06c	gsk3	fim1	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.159	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359582	2542652	2539616	279106	276174	SPAC1687.15	SPBC17G9.02c	gsk3	cdc73	skp1	SPBC17G9.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.191	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359583	2542652	2540797	279106	277316	SPAC1687.15	SPBC18H10.11c	gsk3	ppr2	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.675	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359584	2542652	2540764	279106	277284	SPAC1687.15	SPBC19C7.02	gsk3	ubr1	skp1	SPBC32F12.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.262	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359585	2542652	2540779	279106	277298	SPAC1687.15	SPBC19F8.06c	gsk3	meu22	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.27	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359586	2542652	2540649	279106	277174	SPAC1687.15	SPBC19F8.08	gsk3	rps401	skp1	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.159	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359587	2542652	2540609	279106	277135	SPAC1687.15	SPBC19G7.03c	gsk3	rps3002	skp1	rps30|rps30-2|ysprs30	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.299	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359588	2542652	2540724	279106	277247	SPAC1687.15	SPBC19G7.07c	gsk3	ppr3	skp1	dmr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.566	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359589	2542652	2540664	279106	277189	SPAC1687.15	SPBC215.02	gsk3	bob1	skp1	gim5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.21	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359590	2542652	2540321	279106	276851	SPAC1687.15	SPBC21C3.07c	gsk3	SPBC21C3.07c	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.578	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359591	2542652	2540626	279106	277152	SPAC1687.15	SPBC21C3.08c	gsk3	car2	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.165	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359592	2542652	2540675	279106	277200	SPAC1687.15	SPBC21H7.07c	gsk3	his5	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.544	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359593	2542652	2540635	279106	277161	SPAC1687.15	SPBC23G7.08c	gsk3	rga7	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.564	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359594	2542652	2540641	279106	277166	SPAC1687.15	SPBC23G7.16	gsk3	ctr6	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.704	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359595	2542652	2540385	279106	276914	SPAC1687.15	SPBC25H2.08c	gsk3	mrs2	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.227	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359596	2542652	2540501	279106	277029	SPAC1687.15	SPBC27B12.11c	gsk3	pho7	skp1	SPBC27B12.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.177	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359597	2542652	2540525	279106	277053	SPAC1687.15	SPBC29A3.01	gsk3	ccc2	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.432	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359598	2542652	2540512	279106	277040	SPAC1687.15	SPBC29A3.05	gsk3	vps71	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.163	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359599	2542652	2540274	279106	276805	SPAC1687.15	SPBC29B5.03c	gsk3	rpl26	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.393	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359600	2542652	2540481	279106	277009	SPAC1687.15	SPBC2D10.12	gsk3	rhp23	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.564	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359601	2542652	2540492	279106	277020	SPAC1687.15	SPBC2D10.13	gsk3	est1	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.317	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359602	2542652	2540443	279106	276971	SPAC1687.15	SPBC2D10.16	gsk3	mhf1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.056	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359603	2542652	2540363	279106	276892	SPAC1687.15	SPBC2F12.09c	gsk3	atf21	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.474	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359604	2542652	2540342	279106	276871	SPAC1687.15	SPBC2G2.01c	gsk3	liz1	skp1	SPBC4B4.13c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.215	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359605	2542652	2540282	279106	276813	SPAC1687.15	SPBC2G2.03c	gsk3	sbh1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.19	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359606	2542652	2540351	279106	276880	SPAC1687.15	SPBC2G2.10c	gsk3	mug110	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.428	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359607	2542652	2540306	279106	276836	SPAC1687.15	SPBC2G5.02c	gsk3	ckb2	skp1	SPBC2G5.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.188	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359608	2542652	2540326	279106	276856	SPAC1687.15	SPBC2G5.06c	gsk3	hmt2	skp1	cad1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.385	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359609	2542652	2540969	279106	277485	SPAC1687.15	SPBC30B4.01c	gsk3	wsc1	skp1	SPBC3D6.14c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.572	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359610	2542652	2540335	279106	276865	SPAC1687.15	SPBC30B4.03c	gsk3	adn1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.211	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359611	2542652	2540473	279106	277001	SPAC1687.15	SPBC30D10.10c	gsk3	tor1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.27	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359612	2542652	2540273	279106	276804	SPAC1687.15	SPBC30D10.13c	gsk3	pdb1	skp1	agg1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.386	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359613	2542652	2540319	279106	276849	SPAC1687.15	SPBC30D10.16	gsk3	pha2	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.271	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359614	2542652	2540383	279106	276912	SPAC1687.15	SPBC31E1.02c	gsk3	pmr1	skp1	cps5|pgak2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.262	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359615	2542652	2540327	279106	276857	SPAC1687.15	SPBC31F10.07	gsk3	lsb5	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.487	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359616	2542652	2540227	279106	276759	SPAC1687.15	SPBC31F10.14c	gsk3	hip3	skp1	hir3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.182	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359617	2542652	2541113	279106	277628	SPAC1687.15	SPBC32F12.01c	gsk3	css1	skp1	SPBC685.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.371	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359618	2542652	2540231	279106	276763	SPAC1687.15	SPBC336.14c	gsk3	ppk26	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.205	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359619	2542652	2540929	279106	277445	SPAC1687.15	SPBC354.03	gsk3	swd3	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.179	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359620	2542652	2540930	279106	277446	SPAC1687.15	SPBC354.10	gsk3	def1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.267	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359621	2542652	2540946	279106	277462	SPAC1687.15	SPBC36.04	gsk3	cys11	skp1	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.411	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359622	2542652	2540933	279106	277449	SPAC1687.15	SPBC36.06c	gsk3	spo9	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.245	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359623	2542652	2540943	279106	277459	SPAC1687.15	SPBC36B7.02	gsk3	SPBC36B7.02	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.212	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359624	2542652	2540133	279106	276670	SPAC1687.15	SPBC3B8.02	gsk3	php5	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.181	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359625	2542652	2541025	279106	277540	SPAC1687.15	SPBC3B9.06c	gsk3	atg3	skp1	apg3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.21	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359626	2542652	2540299	279106	276830	SPAC1687.15	SPBC3B9.13c	gsk3	rpp102	skp1	rpp1-2|rpa103	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.177	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359627	2542652	2540966	279106	277482	SPAC1687.15	SPBC3D6.09	gsk3	dpb4	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.311	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359628	2542652	2541035	279106	277550	SPAC1687.15	SPBC3E7.05c	gsk3	SPBC3E7.05c	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.172	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359629	2542652	2541058	279106	277573	SPAC1687.15	SPBC3H7.09	gsk3	erf2	skp1	mug142	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.324	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359630	2542652	2540979	279106	277495	SPAC1687.15	SPBC3H7.10	gsk3	elp6	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.16	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359631	2542652	2541012	279106	277527	SPAC1687.15	SPBC3H7.12	gsk3	rav2	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.215	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359632	2542652	2540718	279106	277241	SPAC1687.15	SPBC3H7.15	gsk3	hhp1	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.718	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359633	2542652	2541076	279106	277591	SPAC1687.15	SPBC4.02c	gsk3	SPBC4.02c	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.194	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359634	2542652	2540763	279106	277283	SPAC1687.15	SPBC405.04c	gsk3	ypt7	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.131	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359635	2542652	2540958	279106	277474	SPAC1687.15	SPBC409.19c	gsk3	SPBC409.19c	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.265	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359636	2542652	2540825	279106	277343	SPAC1687.15	SPBC428.08c	gsk3	clr4	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.336	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359637	2542652	2540866	279106	277383	SPAC1687.15	SPBC4C3.12	gsk3	sep1	skp1	SPBC4C3.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.224	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359638	2542652	2540877	279106	277394	SPAC1687.15	SPBC4F6.05c	gsk3	SPBC4F6.05c	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.174	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359639	2542652	2541101	279106	277616	SPAC1687.15	SPBC609.02	gsk3	ptn1	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.316	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359640	2542652	2541089	279106	277604	SPAC1687.15	SPBC646.09c	gsk3	int6	skp1	yin6	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.196	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359641	2542652	2541120	279106	277635	SPAC1687.15	SPBC649.03	gsk3	rhp14	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.159	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359642	2542652	2541149	279106	277664	SPAC1687.15	SPBC651.03c	gsk3	gyp10	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.225	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359643	2542652	2541115	279106	277630	SPAC1687.15	SPBC660.07	gsk3	ntp1	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.206	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359644	2542652	2541108	279106	277623	SPAC1687.15	SPBC660.10	gsk3	SPBC660.10	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.157	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359645	2542652	2541186	279106	277700	SPAC1687.15	SPBC725.01	gsk3	SPBC725.01	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.166	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359646	2542652	2541178	279106	277692	SPAC1687.15	SPBC725.02	gsk3	mpr1	skp1	spy1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.172	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359647	2542652	2541095	279106	277610	SPAC1687.15	SPBC725.06c	gsk3	ppk31	skp1	mug25	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.376	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359648	2542652	2541180	279106	277694	SPAC1687.15	SPBC776.05	gsk3	SPBC776.05	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.357	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359649	2542652	2541170	279106	277684	SPAC1687.15	SPBC776.15c	gsk3	kgd2	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.196	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359650	2542652	2540821	279106	277339	SPAC1687.15	SPBC800.03	gsk3	clr3	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.356	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359651	2542652	2541212	279106	277726	SPAC1687.15	SPBC887.05c	gsk3	cwf29	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.164	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359652	2542652	2541233	279106	277747	SPAC1687.15	SPBC8D2.01	gsk3	gsk31	skp1	pi064	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.254	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359653	2542652	2541244	279106	277758	SPAC1687.15	SPBC8D2.02c	gsk3	vps68	skp1	SPBC8D2.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.155	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359654	2542652	2541235	279106	277749	SPAC1687.15	SPBC8D2.12c	gsk3	SPBC8D2.12c	skp1	pI053	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.157	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359655	2542652	2541250	279106	277764	SPAC1687.15	SPBC8D2.17	gsk3	gmh4	skp1	SPBC8D2.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.449	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359656	2542652	2541345	279106	277856	SPAC1687.15	SPBP35G2.07	gsk3	ilv1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.154	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359657	2542652	2541369	279106	277880	SPAC1687.15	SPBP4H10.13	gsk3	rps2302	skp1	rps23-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.243	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359658	2542652	2541386	279106	277897	SPAC1687.15	SPBP8B7.24c	gsk3	atg8	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.228	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359659	2542652	2541384	279106	277895	SPAC1687.15	SPBP8B7.26	gsk3	SPBP8B7.26	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.167	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359660	2542652	2541389	279106	277900	SPAC1687.15	SPBPB2B2.09c	gsk3	SPBPB2B2.09c	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.559	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359661	2542652	2539012	279106	275585	SPAC1687.15	SPCC1020.01c	gsk3	pma2	skp1	SPCC1393.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.55	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359662	2542652	2539239	279106	275809	SPAC1687.15	SPCC1020.10	gsk3	oca2	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.152	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359663	2542652	2538978	279106	275552	SPAC1687.15	SPCC1020.11c	gsk3	ecm6	skp1	SPCC1020.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.273	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359664	2542652	2539252	279106	275822	SPAC1687.15	SPCC1223.11	gsk3	ptc2	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.207	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359665	2542652	5802726	279106	857864	SPAC1687.15	SPCC1223.15c	gsk3	spc19	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.169	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359666	2542652	2539169	279106	275740	SPAC1687.15	SPCC1235.11	gsk3	mpc1	skp1	SPCC1235.11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.181	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359667	2542652	2539040	279106	275613	SPAC1687.15	SPCC1259.02c	gsk3	erm1	skp1	SPCC1259.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.679	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359668	2542652	2539078	279106	275650	SPAC1687.15	SPCC1259.04	gsk3	iec3	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.509	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359669	2542652	2539092	279106	275664	SPAC1687.15	SPCC1259.08	gsk3	SPCC1259.08	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.336	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359670	2542652	2539081	279106	275653	SPAC1687.15	SPCC1259.09c	gsk3	pdx1	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.24	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359671	2542652	2539074	279106	275646	SPAC1687.15	SPCC1259.10	gsk3	pgp1	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.952	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359672	2542652	2539140	279106	275712	SPAC1687.15	SPCC1259.11c	gsk3	gyp2	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.249	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359673	2542652	2539087	279106	275659	SPAC1687.15	SPCC1259.13	gsk3	chk1	skp1	rad27	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.287	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359674	2542652	2538871	279106	275450	SPAC1687.15	SPCC1259.14c	gsk3	meu27	skp1	B8647-6	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.275	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359675	2542652	2538902	279106	275480	SPAC1687.15	SPCC13B11.01	gsk3	adh1	skp1	adh	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.376	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359676	2542652	3361128	279106	280204	SPAC1687.15	SPCC1442.04c	gsk3	SPCC1442.04c	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.16	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359677	2542652	2539316	279106	275882	SPAC1687.15	SPCC1450.03	gsk3	SPCC1450.03	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.233	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359678	2542652	2539134	279106	275706	SPAC1687.15	SPCC1450.09c	gsk3	SPCC1450.09c	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.211	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359679	2542652	2538993	279106	275567	SPAC1687.15	SPCC162.12	gsk3	tco89	skp1	SPCC1753.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.574	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359680	2542652	2539244	279106	275814	SPAC1687.15	SPCC1672.06c	gsk3	asp1	skp1	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.171	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359681	2542652	2539233	279106	275803	SPAC1687.15	SPCC16A11.03c	gsk3	SPCC16A11.03c	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.151	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359682	2542652	2539317	279106	275883	SPAC1687.15	SPCC16A11.08	gsk3	atg20	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.258	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359683	2542652	2538968	279106	275542	SPAC1687.15	SPCC16A11.15c	gsk3	SPCC16A11.15c	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.168	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359684	2542652	2538922	279106	275499	SPAC1687.15	SPCC16C4.10	gsk3	SPCC16C4.10	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.202	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359685	2542652	2538770	279106	275353	SPAC1687.15	SPCC1753.02c	gsk3	git3	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.37	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359686	2542652	2539219	279106	275789	SPAC1687.15	SPCC1795.01c	gsk3	mad3	skp1	SPCC895.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.247	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359687	2542652	2538927	279106	275503	SPAC1687.15	SPCC1795.09	gsk3	yps1	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.257	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359688	2542652	2539246	279106	275816	SPAC1687.15	SPCC18.13	gsk3	SPCC18.13	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.226	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359689	2542652	2539250	279106	275820	SPAC1687.15	SPCC1884.02	gsk3	nic1	skp1	SPCC757.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.156	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359690	2542652	2539123	279106	275695	SPAC1687.15	SPCC18B5.03	gsk3	wee1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.466	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359691	2542652	2539333	279106	275899	SPAC1687.15	SPCC1902.02	gsk3	mug72	skp1	SPCC663.16c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.248	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359692	2542652	2539174	279106	275745	SPAC1687.15	SPCC24B10.08c	gsk3	ada2	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.343	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359693	2542652	2539331	279106	275897	SPAC1687.15	SPCC24B10.09	gsk3	rps1702	skp1	rps17|rps17-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.191	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359694	2542652	2539388	279106	275953	SPAC1687.15	SPCC24B10.12	gsk3	cgi121	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.477	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359695	2542652	2539237	279106	275807	SPAC1687.15	SPCC24B10.13	gsk3	skb5	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.188	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359696	2542652	2539365	279106	275931	SPAC1687.15	SPCC24B10.16c	gsk3	SPCC24B10.16c	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.19	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359697	2542652	2538762	279106	275345	SPAC1687.15	SPCC306.04c	gsk3	set1	skp1	kmt2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.784	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359698	2542652	2538949	279106	275523	SPAC1687.15	SPCC320.03	gsk3	SPCC320.03	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.272	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359699	2542652	2538704	279106	275288	SPAC1687.15	SPCC320.07c	gsk3	mde7	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.197	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359700	2542652	2539495	279106	276058	SPAC1687.15	SPCC4F11.02	gsk3	ptc1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.042	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359701	2542652	2538765	279106	275348	SPAC1687.15	SPCC548.04	gsk3	urm1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.165	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359702	2542652	2539405	279106	275970	SPAC1687.15	SPCC553.03	gsk3	pex1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.314	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359703	2542652	2539284	279106	275852	SPAC1687.15	SPCC584.15c	gsk3	SPCC584.15c	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.512	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359704	2542652	2539023	279106	275596	SPAC1687.15	SPCC594.05c	gsk3	spf1	skp1	spp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.222	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359705	2542652	2539525	279106	276087	SPAC1687.15	SPCC613.01	gsk3	SPCC613.01	skp1	SPCC757.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.163	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359706	2542652	2539402	279106	275967	SPAC1687.15	SPCC613.03	gsk3	SPCC613.03	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.213	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359707	2542652	2539506	279106	276069	SPAC1687.15	SPCC63.04	gsk3	mok14	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.161	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359708	2542652	2538796	279106	275377	SPAC1687.15	SPCC63.06	gsk3	SPCC63.06	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.198	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359709	2542652	2539461	279106	276024	SPAC1687.15	SPCC63.08c	gsk3	atg1	skp1	cvt10|ppk36	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.24	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359710	2542652	2539443	279106	276006	SPAC1687.15	SPCC736.02	gsk3	SPCC736.02	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.174	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359711	2542652	2539560	279106	276121	SPAC1687.15	SPCC736.08	gsk3	cbf11	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.223	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359712	2542652	2539403	279106	275968	SPAC1687.15	SPCC736.11	gsk3	ago1	skp1	csp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.347	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359713	2542652	2539110	279106	275682	SPAC1687.15	SPCC757.02c	gsk3	SPCC757.02c	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.197	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359714	2542652	2539434	279106	275997	SPAC1687.15	SPCC757.09c	gsk3	rnc1	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.25	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359715	2542652	2539462	279106	276025	SPAC1687.15	SPCC777.13	gsk3	vps35	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.188	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359716	2542652	2538725	279106	275309	SPAC1687.15	SPCC825.02	gsk3	gbs1	skp1	SPCC825.02|gls2beta	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.385	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359717	2542652	2539448	279106	276011	SPAC1687.15	SPCC825.04c	gsk3	naa40	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.237	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359718	2542652	2539459	279106	276022	SPAC1687.15	SPCC825.05c	gsk3	pwi1	skp1	SPCC825.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.212	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359719	2542652	2538986	279106	275560	SPAC1687.15	SPCC895.06	gsk3	elp2	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.438	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359720	2542652	2539263	279106	275833	SPAC1687.15	SPCC895.09c	gsk3	ucp12	skp1	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.203	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359721	2542652	2538908	279106	275485	SPAC1687.15	SPCC970.02	gsk3	SPCC970.02	skp1	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.155	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359722	2539130	2541536	275702	278036	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1071.02	amk2	mms19	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.162	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359723	2539130	2541642	275702	278138	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC10F6.05c	amk2	ubc6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.145	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359724	2539130	2541628	275702	278124	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC110.02	amk2	pds5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.244	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359725	2539130	3361456	275702	280532	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1142.03c	amk2	swi2	-	SPAC17G6.20c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.154	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359726	2539130	3361562	275702	280638	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC11E3.03	amk2	csm1	-	pcs1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.24	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359727	2539130	2541877	275702	278367	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC11E3.05	amk2	sea3	-	SPAC11E3.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.916	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359728	2539130	2541512	275702	278013	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC11E3.08c	amk2	nse6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.289	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359729	2539130	2543012	275702	279450	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1250.02	amk2	mug95	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.305	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359730	2539130	2541565	275702	278063	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1250.03	amk2	ubc14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.15	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359731	2539130	2542950	275702	279390	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC12B10.03	amk2	bun62	-	wdr20	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.228	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359732	2539130	2542967	275702	279407	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC12B10.12c	amk2	rhp41	-	rhp4a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.312	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359733	2539130	2543139	275702	279571	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC12G12.03	amk2	cip2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.2	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359734	2539130	2543092	275702	279525	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1327.01c	amk2	SPAC1327.01c	-	SPAC1783.09c|SPAC18G6.16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.562	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359735	2539130	2542617	275702	279071	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC13A11.01c	amk2	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.183	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359736	2539130	2542130	275702	278606	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC13A11.05	amk2	ysp2	-	SPAC13A11.05|yspII	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.41	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359737	2539130	2542365	275702	278829	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC13C5.03	amk2	tht1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.471	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359738	2539130	2542320	275702	278786	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC13C5.05c	amk2	SPAC13C5.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.191	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359739	2539130	2542906	275702	279350	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC13D6.03c	amk2	trm9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.175	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359740	2539130	2542835	275702	279281	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC13G6.03	amk2	gpi7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.184	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359741	2539130	2542895	275702	279339	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC13G6.10c	amk2	asl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.521	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359742	2539130	2542908	275702	279352	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC13G7.03	amk2	upf3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.228	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359743	2539130	2542838	275702	279284	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC13G7.11	amk2	SPAC13G7.11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.319	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359744	2539130	2542839	275702	279285	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC13G7.12c	amk2	SPAC13G7.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.272	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359745	2539130	2542862	275702	279308	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC140.03	amk2	arb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.286	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359746	2539130	2542823	275702	279270	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC144.03	amk2	ade2	-	min10|min3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.176	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359747	2539130	2542904	275702	279348	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC144.11	amk2	rps1102	-	rps11|rps11-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.168	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359748	2539130	2542883	275702	279328	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1486.04c	amk2	alm1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.28	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359749	2539130	3361558	275702	280634	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC14C4.16	amk2	dad3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.341	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359750	2539130	2541635	275702	278131	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1556.01c	amk2	rad50	-	SPAP4C9.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.323	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359751	2539130	2541690	275702	278186	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1556.02c	amk2	sdh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.415	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359752	2539130	2541698	275702	278194	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1556.05c	amk2	cgr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.437	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359753	2539130	2541595	275702	278092	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1565.01	amk2	SPAC1565.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.094	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359754	2539130	2542802	275702	279250	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC15E1.06	amk2	vps29	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.224	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359755	2539130	2542806	275702	279254	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1610.01	amk2	saf5	-	SPAC1610.01|icln|lot5|SPAC17A5.17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.276	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359756	2539130	2542750	275702	279200	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1635.01	amk2	SPAC1635.01	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.236	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359757	2539130	3361385	275702	280461	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1639.02c	amk2	trk2	-	SPAC1F5.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.157	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359758	2539130	2542776	275702	279225	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC167.01	amk2	ire1	-	ppk4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.23	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359759	2539130	2542311	275702	278777	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC16A10.05c	amk2	dad1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.19	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359760	2539130	2542338	275702	278804	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC16E8.01	amk2	shd1	-	sla1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.751	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359761	2539130	3361540	275702	280616	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1751.04	amk2	SPAC1751.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.165	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359762	2539130	2542165	275702	278641	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1782.08c	amk2	rex3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.17	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359763	2539130	2542362	275702	278826	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1783.02c	amk2	vps66	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.28	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359764	2539130	2542366	275702	278830	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1783.04c	amk2	hst4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.243	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359765	2539130	2542451	275702	278912	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1786.04	amk2	SPAC1786.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.221	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359766	2539130	2542136	275702	278612	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC17A2.06c	amk2	vps8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.187	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359767	2539130	2542268	275702	278737	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC17A5.07c	amk2	ulp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.199	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359768	2539130	2542439	275702	278901	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC17A5.08	amk2	erp2	-	SPAC17A5.08|erp3|erp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.825	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359769	2539130	2542168	275702	278643	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC17A5.16	amk2	ftp105	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.638	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359770	2539130	2542141	275702	278617	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC17C9.05c	amk2	pmc3	-	med27|prk1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.196	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359771	2539130	2542380	275702	278844	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC17G6.04c	amk2	cpp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.235	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359772	2539130	2542419	275702	278882	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC17G6.05c	amk2	bro1	-	SPAC17G6.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.183	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359773	2539130	2542273	275702	278742	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC17H9.13c	amk2	SPAC17H9.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.751	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359774	2539130	2542418	275702	278881	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1805.07c	amk2	dad2	-	hos2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.404	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359775	2539130	2542538	275702	278995	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1805.11c	amk2	rps2602	-	rps26-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.209	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359776	2539130	2542435	275702	278897	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1805.16c	amk2	SPAC1805.16c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.0	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359777	2539130	2542560	275702	279016	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1851.02	amk2	slc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.434	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359778	2539130	3361388	275702	280464	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC18B11.11	amk2	SPAC18B11.11	-	SPAC1F5.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.162	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359779	2539130	2542239	275702	278711	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC18G6.02c	amk2	chp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.199	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359780	2539130	2542544	275702	279001	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC18G6.10	amk2	lem2	-	heh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.407	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359781	2539130	2542554	275702	279011	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1952.03	amk2	otu2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.2	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359782	2539130	2542522	275702	278980	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC19A8.03	amk2	ymr1	-	SPAC19A8.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.757	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359783	2539130	2542542	275702	278999	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC19A8.10	amk2	rfp1	-	mug140	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.276	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359784	2539130	2542407	275702	278871	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC19B12.06c	amk2	SPAC19B12.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.182	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359785	2539130	2542606	275702	279060	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC19B12.10	amk2	sst2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.027	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359786	2539130	2542456	275702	278917	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC19G12.05	amk2	SPAC19G12.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.298	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359787	2539130	2542519	275702	278977	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC19G12.08	amk2	scs7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.333	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359788	2539130	2542577	275702	279033	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC19G12.15c	amk2	tpp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.765	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359789	2539130	2542434	275702	278896	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1F12.06c	amk2	SPAC1F12.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.882	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359790	2539130	2541461	275702	277963	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1F3.09	amk2	mug161	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.389	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359791	2539130	2541432	275702	277937	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1F5.05c	amk2	mso1	-	SPAC1F5.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.299	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359792	2539130	2541627	275702	278123	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1F5.08c	amk2	yam8	-	ehs1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.363	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359793	2539130	2541558	275702	278057	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1F7.08	amk2	fio1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.917	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359794	2539130	3361548	275702	280624	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC20G8.10c	amk2	atg6	-	SPAC3A12.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.41	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359795	2539130	2542010	275702	278493	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC20H4.05c	amk2	SPAC20H4.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.158	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359796	2539130	2541911	275702	278401	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC212.04c	amk2	SPAC212.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.494	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359797	2539130	2541494	275702	277996	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC227.15	amk2	SPAC227.15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.151	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359798	2539130	2541500	275702	278002	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC227.18	amk2	lys3	-	SPAC2F7.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.951	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359799	2539130	2541829	275702	278320	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC22A12.10	amk2	SPAC22A12.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.808	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359800	2539130	2541803	275702	278294	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC22E12.04	amk2	ccs1	-	pccs	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.405	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359801	2539130	2541899	275702	278389	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC22E12.11c	amk2	set3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.744	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359802	2539130	2541875	275702	278365	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC22F3.06c	amk2	lon1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.175	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359803	2539130	2541871	275702	278361	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC22F3.09c	amk2	res2	-	mcs1|pct1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.303	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359804	2539130	2541764	275702	278258	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC22F3.12c	amk2	rgs1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.0	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359805	2539130	2541439	275702	277944	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC22F8.11	amk2	plc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.611	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359806	2539130	2541730	275702	278224	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC22H10.11c	amk2	SPAC22H10.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.153	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359807	2539130	2542012	275702	278495	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC23C11.02c	amk2	rps23	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.17	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359808	2539130	2542032	275702	278514	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC23C11.04c	amk2	pnk1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.267	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359809	2539130	2541771	275702	278265	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC23H3.06	amk2	apl6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.158	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359810	2539130	2541872	275702	278362	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC23H4.10c	amk2	thi4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.152	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359811	2539130	2541560	275702	278059	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC24B11.12c	amk2	SPAC24B11.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.582	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359812	2539130	3361383	275702	280459	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC24B11.13	amk2	hem3	-	SPAC806.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.363	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359813	2539130	2541689	275702	278185	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC24C9.05c	amk2	mug70	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.229	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359814	2539130	2541586	275702	278083	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC24C9.07c	amk2	bgs2	-	meu21|pgs2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.158	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359815	2539130	2542626	275702	279080	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC24H6.08	amk2	SPAC24H6.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.184	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359816	2539130	2542635	275702	279089	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC24H6.09	amk2	gef1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.289	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359817	2539130	2542625	275702	279079	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC24H6.11c	amk2	SPAC24H6.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.167	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359818	2539130	2542728	275702	279178	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC25B8.13c	amk2	isp7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.543	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359819	2539130	2542720	275702	279171	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC25G10.05c	amk2	his1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.215	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359820	2539130	2542751	275702	279201	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC25G10.06	amk2	rps2801	-	rps28-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.208	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359821	2539130	2542716	275702	279169	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC25H1.07	amk2	emc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.928	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359822	2539130	3361468	275702	280544	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC26A3.01	amk2	sxa1	-	SPAC2E1P5.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.164	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359823	2539130	2542093	275702	278570	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC26A3.04	amk2	rpl2002	-	rpl20|rpl20-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.168	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359824	2539130	2542071	275702	278548	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC26H5.03	amk2	pcf2	-	cac2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.872	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359825	2539130	2542223	275702	278696	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC27D7.08c	amk2	SPAC27D7.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.162	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359826	2539130	2542681	275702	279134	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC27E2.01	amk2	SPAC27E2.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.396	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359827	2539130	2541434	275702	277939	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC27E2.03c	amk2	SPAC27E2.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.169	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359828	2539130	2542696	275702	279149	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC29B12.03	amk2	spd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.163	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359829	2539130	2542639	275702	279093	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC2C4.05	amk2	cor1	-	SPAC2C4.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.484	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359830	2539130	2542650	275702	279104	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC2C4.10c	amk2	csc4	-	SPAC2C4.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.543	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359831	2539130	2541473	275702	277975	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC2C4.14c	amk2	ppk11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.192	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359832	2539130	2541964	275702	278450	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC2F3.08	amk2	sut1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.515	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359833	2539130	2541672	275702	278168	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC2F3.15	amk2	lsk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.16	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359834	2539130	2541638	275702	278134	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC2F7.06c	amk2	pol4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.153	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359835	2539130	2541478	275702	277980	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC2F7.17	amk2	mrf1	-	SPAC2F7.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.151	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359836	2539130	2541465	275702	277967	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC30C2.02	amk2	mmd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.21	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359837	2539130	2542561	275702	279017	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC31G5.17c	amk2	rps1001	-	rps10-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.231	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359838	2539130	2542222	275702	278695	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC31G5.18c	amk2	sde2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.076	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359839	2539130	2543173	275702	279603	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC323.01c	amk2	pos5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.45	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359840	2539130	2542660	275702	279113	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC328.03	amk2	tps1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.82	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359841	2539130	2543079	275702	279512	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC343.04c	amk2	SPAC343.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.177	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359842	2539130	2543170	275702	279601	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC343.09	amk2	ubx3	-	mug39	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.63	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359843	2539130	2543065	275702	279498	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC343.15	amk2	tit1	-	mod5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.179	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359844	2539130	2543119	275702	279551	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC3A11.07	amk2	nde2	-	SPAC3A11.07	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.173	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359845	2539130	2543116	275702	279548	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC3A11.08	amk2	pcu4	-	Cul-4|cul4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.199	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359846	2539130	2542725	275702	279176	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC3A12.10	amk2	rpl2001	-	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.567	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359847	2539130	2543108	275702	279540	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC3A12.13c	amk2	SPAC3A12.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.583	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359848	2539130	2543687	275702	280101	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC3C7.04	amk2	SPAC3C7.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.161	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359849	2539130	2542896	275702	279340	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC3F10.04	amk2	gsa1	-	gsh2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.179	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359850	2539130	2543103	275702	279535	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC3F10.09	amk2	SPAC3F10.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.207	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359851	2539130	2542271	275702	278740	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC3F10.10c	amk2	map3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.335	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359852	2539130	2543193	275702	279622	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC3F10.11c	amk2	abc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.078	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359853	2539130	2543164	275702	279595	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC3G6.06c	amk2	rad2	-	fen1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.241	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359854	2539130	2543452	275702	279872	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC3G9.04	amk2	ssu72	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.329	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359855	2539130	2543612	275702	280026	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC3H1.09c	amk2	avt3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.178	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359856	2539130	2543637	275702	280051	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC3H8.02	amk2	csr102	-	SPAC3H8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.473	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359857	2539130	2543444	275702	279864	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC458.05	amk2	pik3	-	vps34	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.4	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359858	2539130	2543606	275702	280021	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC4C5.04	amk2	rad31	-	uba4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.197	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359859	2539130	2543624	275702	280038	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC4D7.06c	amk2	SPAC4D7.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.703	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359860	2539130	2543619	275702	280033	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC4F10.04	amk2	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.244	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359861	2539130	2543652	275702	280066	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC4H3.03c	amk2	SPAC4H3.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.16	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359862	2539130	2543495	275702	279914	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC513.03	amk2	mfm2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.993	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359863	2539130	2543485	275702	279905	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC513.05	amk2	ams1	-	mns2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.209	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359864	2539130	2541590	275702	278087	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC57A10.02	amk2	cdr2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.262	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359865	2539130	2542830	275702	279277	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC57A10.08c	amk2	SPAC57A10.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.161	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359866	2539130	2541505	275702	278007	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC57A7.04c	amk2	pabp	-	pab1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.498	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359867	2539130	2541995	275702	278479	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC5D6.02c	amk2	mug165	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.207	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359868	2539130	2541925	275702	278413	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC5D6.05	amk2	med18	-	sep11|pmc6	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.226	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359869	2539130	2541543	275702	278043	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC5H10.04	amk2	SPAC5H10.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.479	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359870	2539130	2542714	275702	279167	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC5H10.06c	amk2	adh4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.179	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359871	2539130	2541618	275702	278115	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC5H10.08c	amk2	pan6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.166	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359872	2539130	2542508	275702	278966	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC607.02c	amk2	SPAC607.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.303	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359873	2539130	2543645	275702	280059	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC607.09c	amk2	btn1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.238	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359874	2539130	2543431	275702	279851	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC630.04c	amk2	SPAC630.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.218	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359875	2539130	2543247	275702	279675	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC630.11	amk2	vps55	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.228	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359876	2539130	2543426	275702	279846	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC631.02	amk2	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.174	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359877	2539130	2543384	275702	279806	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC637.06	amk2	gmh5	-	SPAC637.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.581	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359878	2539130	2543678	275702	280092	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC637.11	amk2	rpm2	-	pah1|suv3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.547	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359879	2539130	2543566	275702	279982	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC652.01	amk2	SPAC652.01	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.213	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359880	2539130	2541633	275702	278129	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC664.01c	amk2	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.823	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359881	2539130	2543348	275702	279770	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC688.13	amk2	scn3	-	scn1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.157	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359882	2539130	2543308	275702	279732	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC694.04c	amk2	SPAC694.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.182	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359883	2539130	2542946	275702	279386	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC6F12.03c	amk2	fsv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.81	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359884	2539130	2542198	275702	278673	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC6F12.09	amk2	rdp1	-	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.157	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359885	2539130	2542812	275702	279259	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC6F6.01	amk2	cch1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.387	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359886	2539130	2542777	275702	279226	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC6F6.03c	amk2	SPAC6F6.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.153	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359887	2539130	2542157	275702	278633	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC6F6.09	amk2	eaf6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.752	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359888	2539130	2541445	275702	277950	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC6G10.11c	amk2	ubi3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.309	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359889	2539130	2541564	275702	278062	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC750.05c	amk2	SPAC750.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.211	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359890	2539130	2542089	275702	278566	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC7D4.03c	amk2	SPAC7D4.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.481	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359891	2539130	2542228	275702	278701	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC823.03	amk2	ppk15	-	SPAC1E11.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.191	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359892	2539130	2543361	275702	279783	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC823.10c	amk2	SPAC823.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.349	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359893	2539130	2542447	275702	278908	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC824.07	amk2	SPAC824.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.231	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359894	2539130	2543492	275702	279912	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC890.07c	amk2	rmt1	-	prmt1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.192	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359895	2539130	5802920	275702	858058	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC8C9.19	amk2	SPAC8C9.19	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.249	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359896	2539130	2543434	275702	279854	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC8F11.02c	amk2	dph3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.485	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359897	2539130	2543655	275702	280069	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC9.08c	amk2	SPAC9.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.293	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359898	2539130	2543555	275702	279972	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC922.05c	amk2	SPAC922.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.339	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359899	2539130	2543545	275702	279962	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC926.03	amk2	rlc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.402	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359900	2539130	2543531	275702	279949	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC926.06c	amk2	SPAC926.06c	-	lrr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.402	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359901	2539130	2543472	275702	279892	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC959.04c	amk2	omh6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.231	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359902	2539130	2543239	275702	279667	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC977.10	amk2	sod2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.176	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359903	2539130	2542976	275702	279414	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC9E9.09c	amk2	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.312	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359904	2539130	2542873	275702	279318	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC9G1.02	amk2	wis4	-	wak1|wik1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.165	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359905	2539130	2542740	275702	279190	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC9G1.06c	amk2	cyk3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.34	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359906	2539130	2542759	275702	279209	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC9G1.07	amk2	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.25	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359907	2539130	2542192	275702	278667	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC9G1.12	amk2	cpd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.152	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359908	2539130	2542214	275702	278688	SPCC1919.03c	SPACUNK4.11c	amk2	mpp6	-	SPACUNK4.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.23	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359909	2539130	3361409	275702	280485	SPCC1919.03c	SPAPB17E12.03	amk2	SPAPB17E12.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.344	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359910	2539130	3361399	275702	280475	SPCC1919.03c	SPAPB17E12.08	amk2	SPAPB17E12.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.203	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359911	2539130	2543369	275702	279791	SPCC1919.03c	SPAPB1A10.07c	amk2	SPAPB1A10.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.343	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359912	2539130	3361480	275702	280556	SPCC1919.03c	SPAPB1A11.01	amk2	mfc1	-	SPAPB24D3.11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.203	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359913	2539130	2543670	275702	280084	SPCC1919.03c	SPAPB1E7.06c	amk2	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.275	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359914	2539130	2543463	275702	279883	SPCC1919.03c	SPAPB21F2.03	amk2	slx9	-	SPAPB21F2.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.231	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359915	2539130	2543483	275702	279903	SPCC1919.03c	SPAPB2B4.02	amk2	grx5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.158	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359916	2539130	2543332	275702	279755	SPCC1919.03c	SPAPB8E5.04c	amk2	SPAPB8E5.04c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.162	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359917	2539130	2543305	275702	279729	SPCC1919.03c	SPAPJ696.02	amk2	lsb4	-	SPAPJ696.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.202	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359918	2539130	2542979	275702	279417	SPCC1919.03c	SPAPJ760.02c	amk2	abp1	-	app1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.196	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359919	2539130	2543050	275702	279485	SPCC1919.03c	SPAPJ760.03c	amk2	adg1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.182	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359920	2539130	2542933	275702	279374	SPCC1919.03c	SPAPYUG7.06	amk2	sdu1	-	mug67|hag1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.154	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359921	2539130	2542267	275702	278736	SPCC1919.03c	SPAPYUK71.03c	amk2	syn1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.602	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359922	2539130	2540127	275702	276664	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC106.20	amk2	exo70	-	SPBC582.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.402	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359923	2539130	2539815	275702	276365	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1105.02c	amk2	lys4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.157	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359924	2539130	2540070	275702	276608	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC119.04	amk2	mei3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.19	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359925	2539130	2540061	275702	276599	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC119.12	amk2	rud3	-	SPBC119.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.313	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359926	2539130	2539668	275702	276223	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC11B10.10c	amk2	pht1	-	pi001	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.249	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359927	2539130	2540023	275702	276567	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC11C11.10	amk2	SPBC11C11.10	-	SPBC3B8.13c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.61	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359928	2539130	2539902	275702	276448	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC11G11.02c	amk2	end3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.163	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359929	2539130	2539699	275702	276252	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC11G11.05	amk2	rpa34	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.207	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359930	2539130	2539792	275702	276342	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1271.14	amk2	SPBC1271.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.236	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359931	2539130	2539990	275702	276534	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1289.14	amk2	SPBC1289.14	-	SPBC8E4.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.416	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359932	2539130	2539931	275702	276475	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC12C2.09c	amk2	SPBC12C2.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.213	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359933	2539130	2539649	275702	276204	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC12D12.04c	amk2	pck2	-	pkc1|sts6	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.363	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359934	2539130	2539651	275702	276206	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC12D12.06	amk2	srb11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.169	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359935	2539130	2539918	275702	276462	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1306.02	amk2	rtt10	-	SPBC1306.02|SPBC4.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.314	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359936	2539130	2540201	275702	276734	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC13A2.04c	amk2	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.168	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359937	2539130	2540108	275702	276645	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC13E7.11	amk2	rbd1	-	SPBC13E7.11|rh1|SPBC30D10.19c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.281	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359938	2539130	2539673	275702	276228	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC13G1.10c	amk2	mug81	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.586	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359939	2539130	2539670	275702	276225	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC13G1.12	amk2	did2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.6	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359940	2539130	2539695	275702	276249	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC13G1.14c	amk2	SPBC13G1.14c	-	SPBC25D12.07c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.178	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359941	2539130	2539986	275702	276530	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC14C8.16c	amk2	bot1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.392	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359942	2539130	2539750	275702	276302	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC14F5.10c	amk2	SPBC14F5.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.243	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359943	2539130	2539982	275702	276526	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1539.06	amk2	SPBC1539.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.868	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359944	2539130	2539893	275702	276439	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1539.10	amk2	nop16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.299	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359945	2539130	2539831	275702	276380	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC15C4.05	amk2	dhx29	-	SPBC15C4.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.259	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359946	2539130	2539778	275702	276328	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC15D4.01c	amk2	klp9	-	SPBC2D10.21c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.157	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359947	2539130	2539606	275702	276164	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC15D4.05	amk2	SPBC15D4.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.154	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359948	2539130	2539850	275702	276398	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC15D4.07c	amk2	atg9	-	apg9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.44	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359949	2539130	2540155	275702	276691	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1604.04	amk2	SPBC1604.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.283	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359950	2539130	2539928	275702	276472	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1604.08c	amk2	imp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.0	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359951	2539130	2540203	275702	276736	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1604.09c	amk2	SPBC1604.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.178	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359952	2539130	2539857	275702	276404	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1604.20c	amk2	tea2	-	klp4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.382	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359953	2539130	2539711	275702	276264	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1683.09c	amk2	frp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.605	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359954	2539130	2540015	275702	276559	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1685.02c	amk2	rps1202	-	rps12-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.955	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359955	2539130	2539740	275702	276292	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1685.04	amk2	SPBC1685.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.17	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359956	2539130	2539769	275702	276320	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1685.08	amk2	cti6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.187	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359957	2539130	2540029	275702	276573	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC16A3.01	amk2	spn3	-	SPBC543.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.42	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359958	2539130	2539934	275702	276478	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC16A3.03c	amk2	ppr7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.254	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359959	2539130	2539737	275702	276289	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC16A3.07c	amk2	nrm1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.427	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359960	2539130	2539743	275702	276295	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC16A3.08c	amk2	oga1	-	SPBC16A3.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.672	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359961	2539130	2539940	275702	276484	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC16A3.10	amk2	SPBC16A3.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.311	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359962	2539130	2539684	275702	276239	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC16A3.16	amk2	SPBC16A3.16	-	cwc27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.153	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359963	2539130	2539979	275702	276523	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC16A3.17c	amk2	SPBC16A3.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.424	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359964	2539130	2540125	275702	276662	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC16C6.01c	amk2	SPBC16C6.01c	-	SPBC543.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.157	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359965	2539130	2539861	275702	276408	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC16C6.06	amk2	vps10	-	pep1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.274	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359966	2539130	2539899	275702	276445	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC16D10.01c	amk2	SPBC16D10.01c	-	SPBC418.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.58	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359967	2539130	3361342	275702	280418	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC16D10.07c	amk2	sir2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.22	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359968	2539130	2540026	275702	276570	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC16D10.08c	amk2	hsp104	-	SPBC16D10.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.177	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359969	2539130	2540028	275702	276572	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC16E9.09c	amk2	erp5	-	SPBC16E9.09c|erp6	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.83	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359970	2539130	2539756	275702	276308	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC16E9.18	amk2	psd1	-	SPBC1E8.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.538	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359971	2539130	2540075	275702	276613	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC16H5.06	amk2	rip1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.218	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359972	2539130	2540072	275702	276610	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC16H5.07c	amk2	ppa2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.445	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359973	2539130	2540078	275702	276616	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC16H5.08c	amk2	SPBC16H5.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.163	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359974	2539130	2539925	275702	276469	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC16H5.13	amk2	SPBC16H5.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.179	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359975	2539130	2539718	275702	276271	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1703.03c	amk2	SPBC1703.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.245	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359976	2539130	2539859	275702	276406	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1706.03	amk2	fzo1	-	SPBC839.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.175	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359977	2539130	2540194	275702	276727	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1709.09	amk2	rrf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.14	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359978	2539130	2539894	275702	276440	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1709.12	amk2	rid1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.213	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359979	2539130	2539883	275702	276429	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1709.19c	amk2	nfu1	-	SPBC1709.19c|SPBC409.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.175	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359980	2539130	2539739	275702	276291	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1711.03	amk2	aim27	-	emc3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.72	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359981	2539130	2539650	275702	276205	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1711.13	amk2	his2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.367	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359982	2539130	2539720	275702	276273	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1711.14	amk2	rec15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.278	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359983	2539130	2539675	275702	276230	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1718.03	amk2	ker1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.325	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359984	2539130	2539686	275702	276241	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1734.06	amk2	rhp18	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.471	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359985	2539130	2540068	275702	276606	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1734.12c	amk2	alg12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.226	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359986	2539130	2539839	275702	276388	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1734.13	amk2	atp3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.218	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359987	2539130	2539980	275702	276524	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1773.14	amk2	arg7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.174	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359988	2539130	2540131	275702	276668	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1778.05c	amk2	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.455	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359989	2539130	2539765	275702	276316	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1778.06c	amk2	fim1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.618	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359990	2539130	2540132	275702	276669	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1778.07	amk2	SPBC1778.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.153	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359991	2539130	2539614	275702	276172	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC17D11.08	amk2	SPBC17D11.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.21	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359992	2539130	2539865	275702	276412	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC17G9.08c	amk2	cnt5	-	csx2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.503	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359993	2539130	2539738	275702	276290	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC17G9.09	amk2	tif213	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.199	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359994	2539130	2540791	275702	277310	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC18E5.14c	amk2	SPBC18E5.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.218	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359995	2539130	2540797	275702	277316	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC18H10.11c	amk2	ppr2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.388	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359996	2539130	2540836	275702	277354	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC18H10.19	amk2	vps38	-	atg14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.236	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359997	2539130	2540730	275702	277253	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC19C2.09	amk2	sre1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.171	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359998	2539130	2540750	275702	277272	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC19C7.11	amk2	SPBC19C7.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.178	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2359999	2539130	2540702	275702	277226	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC19F8.03c	amk2	yap18	-	SPBC19F8.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.167	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360000	2539130	2540779	275702	277298	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC19F8.06c	amk2	meu22	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.465	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360001	2539130	2540662	275702	277187	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC19G7.02	amk2	SPBC19G7.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.394	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360002	2539130	2540724	275702	277247	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC19G7.07c	amk2	ppr3	-	dmr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.203	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360003	2539130	3361193	275702	280269	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC19G7.18c	amk2	SPBC19G7.18c	-	SPBC19G7.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.197	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360004	2539130	2540278	275702	276809	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC1A4.04	amk2	SPBC1A4.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.385	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360005	2539130	2540352	275702	276881	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC215.03c	amk2	csn1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.25	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360006	2539130	2540729	275702	277252	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC215.08c	amk2	arg4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.58	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360007	2539130	2540613	275702	277139	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC216.03	amk2	SPBC216.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.162	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360008	2539130	2540321	275702	276851	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC21C3.07c	amk2	SPBC21C3.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.743	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360009	2539130	2540575	275702	277102	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC21C3.11	amk2	ubx4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.327	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360010	2539130	2540519	275702	277047	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC21C3.14c	amk2	SPBC21C3.14c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.315	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360011	2539130	2540617	275702	277143	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC21C3.20c	amk2	git1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.388	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360012	2539130	2540675	275702	277200	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC21H7.07c	amk2	his5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.341	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360013	2539130	2540553	275702	277080	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC23G7.06c	amk2	SPBC23G7.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.395	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360014	2539130	2540635	275702	277161	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC23G7.08c	amk2	rga7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.681	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360015	2539130	2540442	275702	276970	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC25B2.04c	amk2	mtg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.207	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360016	2539130	2540628	275702	277154	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC25B2.08	amk2	SPBC25B2.08	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.229	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360017	2539130	2540385	275702	276914	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC25H2.08c	amk2	mrs2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.156	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360018	2539130	2540570	275702	277097	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC25H2.16c	amk2	gga22	-	SPBC25H2.16c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.253	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360019	2539130	2540316	275702	276846	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC27B12.08	amk2	sip1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.337	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360020	2539130	2540502	275702	277030	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC27B12.10c	amk2	tom7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.808	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360021	2539130	2540593	275702	277119	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC28E12.03	amk2	rga4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.191	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360022	2539130	2541038	275702	277553	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC29A10.01	amk2	ccr1	-	SPBC365.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.193	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360023	2539130	2540637	275702	277163	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC29A10.02	amk2	spo5	-	SPBC365.18|mrb1|mug12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.309	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360024	2539130	2540287	275702	276818	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC29A10.08	amk2	gas2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.309	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360025	2539130	2540525	275702	277053	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC29A3.01	amk2	ccc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.598	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360026	2539130	2540465	275702	276993	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC29A3.03c	amk2	SPBC29A3.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.172	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360027	2539130	2540274	275702	276805	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC29B5.03c	amk2	rpl26	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.262	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360028	2539130	2540427	275702	276955	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC2A9.13	amk2	SPBC2A9.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.161	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360029	2539130	2540481	275702	277009	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC2D10.12	amk2	rhp23	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.39	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360030	2539130	2540492	275702	277020	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC2D10.13	amk2	est1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.395	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360031	2539130	2540558	275702	277085	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC2D10.17	amk2	clr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.519	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360032	2539130	2540358	275702	276887	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC2F12.04	amk2	rpl1701	-	rpl17|rpl17-1|SPCC2F12.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.226	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360033	2539130	2540363	275702	276892	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC2F12.09c	amk2	atf21	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.228	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360034	2539130	2540318	275702	276848	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC30B4.04c	amk2	sol1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.54	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360035	2539130	2540280	275702	276811	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC30D10.09c	amk2	SPBC30D10.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.271	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360036	2539130	2540473	275702	277001	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC30D10.10c	amk2	tor1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.155	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360037	2539130	2540319	275702	276849	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC30D10.16	amk2	pha2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.284	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360038	2539130	2540383	275702	276912	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC31E1.02c	amk2	pmr1	-	cps5|pgak2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.17	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360039	2539130	2540327	275702	276857	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC31F10.07	amk2	lsb5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.397	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360040	2539130	2540396	275702	276924	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC31F10.12	amk2	tma20	-	SPBC31F10.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.158	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360041	2539130	2541113	275702	277628	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC32F12.01c	amk2	css1	-	SPBC685.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.462	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360042	2539130	2540221	275702	276754	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC32F12.02	amk2	rec14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.201	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360043	2539130	2540547	275702	277074	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC32F12.11	amk2	tdh1	-	gpd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.201	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360044	2539130	2539974	275702	276518	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC32H8.07	amk2	git5	-	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.352	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360045	2539130	2540244	275702	276776	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC336.01	amk2	fbh1	-	fdh|fdh1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.237	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360046	2539130	2540248	275702	276780	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC336.03	amk2	efc25	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.19	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360047	2539130	2540995	275702	277511	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC337.16	amk2	cho1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.42	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360048	2539130	2541020	275702	277535	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC354.04	amk2	SPBC354.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.171	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360049	2539130	2540930	275702	277446	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC354.10	amk2	def1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.972	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360050	2539130	2541010	275702	277525	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC354.14c	amk2	vac8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.405	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360051	2539130	2540946	275702	277462	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC36.04	amk2	cys11	-	cys1a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.0	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360052	2539130	2540959	275702	277475	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC365.12c	amk2	ish1	-	isp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.243	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360053	2539130	2540964	275702	277480	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC365.16	amk2	SPBC365.16	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-2.0	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360054	2539130	2540961	275702	277477	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC36B7.03	amk2	sec63	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.288	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360055	2539130	2540133	275702	276670	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC3B8.02	amk2	php5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.175	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360056	2539130	2540908	275702	277424	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC3B8.03	amk2	SPBC3B8.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.329	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360057	2539130	2541021	275702	277536	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC3B8.10c	amk2	nem1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.139	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360058	2539130	2541025	275702	277540	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC3B9.06c	amk2	atg3	-	apg3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.17	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360059	2539130	2540299	275702	276830	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC3B9.13c	amk2	rpp102	-	rpp1-2|rpa103	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.394	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360060	2539130	2540991	275702	277507	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC3H7.03c	amk2	SPBC3H7.03c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.6	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360061	2539130	2541058	275702	277573	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC3H7.09	amk2	erf2	-	mug142	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.054	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360062	2539130	2540979	275702	277495	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC3H7.10	amk2	elp6	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.058	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360063	2539130	2541012	275702	277527	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC3H7.12	amk2	rav2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.273	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360064	2539130	2540718	275702	277241	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC3H7.15	amk2	hhp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.917	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360065	2539130	2540763	275702	277283	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC405.04c	amk2	ypt7	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.768	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360066	2539130	2540958	275702	277474	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC409.19c	amk2	SPBC409.19c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.201	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360067	2539130	2540606	275702	277132	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC428.03c	amk2	pho4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.197	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360068	2539130	2541050	275702	277565	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC428.05c	amk2	arg12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.215	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360069	2539130	2540825	275702	277343	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC428.08c	amk2	clr4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.405	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360070	2539130	2540877	275702	277394	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC4F6.05c	amk2	SPBC4F6.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.202	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360071	2539130	2540882	275702	277399	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC4F6.08c	amk2	mrpl39	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.336	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360072	2539130	2541068	275702	277583	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC530.11c	amk2	SPBC530.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.266	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360073	2539130	2540913	275702	277429	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC56F2.08c	amk2	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.231	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360074	2539130	2540910	275702	277426	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC577.02	amk2	rpl3801	-	rpl38-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.321	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360075	2539130	2541083	275702	277598	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC577.05c	amk2	rec27	-	mug41	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.169	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360076	2539130	2541093	275702	277608	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC646.08c	amk2	SPBC646.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.153	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360077	2539130	2541089	275702	277604	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC646.09c	amk2	int6	-	yin6	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.704	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360078	2539130	2541127	275702	277642	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC651.02	amk2	SPBC651.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.257	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360079	2539130	2541119	275702	277634	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC651.11c	amk2	apm3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.217	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360080	2539130	2541144	275702	277659	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC685.06	amk2	rps001	-	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.298	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360081	2539130	2541136	275702	277651	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC691.04	amk2	SPBC691.04	-	pi031|SPACTOKYO_453.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.152	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360082	2539130	2541155	275702	277670	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC6B1.04	amk2	mde4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.361	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360083	2539130	2541186	275702	277700	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC725.01	amk2	SPBC725.01	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.151	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360084	2539130	2541178	275702	277692	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC725.02	amk2	mpr1	-	spy1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.508	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360085	2539130	2541112	275702	277627	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC725.07	amk2	pex5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.16	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360086	2539130	2541096	275702	277611	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC725.10	amk2	SPBC725.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.328	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360087	2539130	2540735	275702	277258	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC83.03c	amk2	tas3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.472	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360088	2539130	2540754	275702	277275	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC83.10	amk2	SPBC83.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.223	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360089	2539130	2541132	275702	277647	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC887.02	amk2	SPBC887.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.153	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360090	2539130	2541212	275702	277726	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC887.05c	amk2	cwf29	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.272	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360091	2539130	2541236	275702	277750	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC887.11	amk2	pus2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.228	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360092	2539130	2541250	275702	277764	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC8D2.17	amk2	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.424	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360093	2539130	2541218	275702	277732	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC8D2.18c	amk2	SPBC8D2.18c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.342	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360094	2539130	2541270	275702	277784	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC902.02c	amk2	ctf18	-	chl12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.179	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360095	2539130	2541282	275702	277795	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC902.03	amk2	SPBC902.03	-	psp7	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.546	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360096	2539130	5802845	275702	857983	SPCC1919.03c	SPBCPT2R1.08c	amk2	tlh2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.358	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360097	2539130	2541313	275702	277825	SPCC1919.03c	SPBP26C9.02c	amk2	car1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.371	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360098	2539130	2541345	275702	277856	SPCC1919.03c	SPBP35G2.07	amk2	ilv1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.923	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360099	2539130	2541349	275702	277860	SPCC1919.03c	SPBP35G2.08c	amk2	air1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.312	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360100	2539130	2541364	275702	277875	SPCC1919.03c	SPBP8B7.11	amk2	nxt3	-	glp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.735	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360101	2539130	2541373	275702	277884	SPCC1919.03c	SPBP8B7.18c	amk2	SPBP8B7.18c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.456	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360102	2539130	2541386	275702	277897	SPCC1919.03c	SPBP8B7.24c	amk2	atg8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.266	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360103	2539130	2541374	275702	277885	SPCC1919.03c	SPBPB10D8.06c	amk2	SPBPB10D8.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.187	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360104	2539130	3361178	275702	280254	SPCC1919.03c	SPBPB21E7.04c	amk2	SPBPB21E7.04c	-	SPAPB21E7.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.258	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360105	2539130	3361179	275702	280255	SPCC1919.03c	SPBPB21E7.05	amk2	SPBPB21E7.05	-	SPAPB21E7.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.15	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360106	2539130	2541394	275702	277903	SPCC1919.03c	SPBPB2B2.02	amk2	mug180	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.258	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360107	2539130	2541389	275702	277900	SPCC1919.03c	SPBPB2B2.09c	amk2	SPBPB2B2.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.527	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360108	2539130	2541413	275702	277921	SPCC1919.03c	SPBPJ4664.06	amk2	gpt1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.15	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360109	2539130	2539012	275702	275585	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1020.01c	amk2	pma2	-	SPCC1393.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.483	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360110	2539130	2539150	275702	275722	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1020.03	amk2	mmt1	-	SPCC1020.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.201	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360111	2539130	2538948	275702	275522	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1020.07	amk2	SPCC1020.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.204	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360112	2539130	2538978	275702	275552	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1020.11c	amk2	ecm6	-	SPCC1020.11c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.2	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360113	2539130	2538844	275702	275425	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1183.09c	amk2	pmp31	-	mug75	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.619	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360114	2539130	2539252	275702	275822	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1223.11	amk2	ptc2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.195	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360115	2539130	2539296	275702	275864	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1235.03	amk2	cue2	-	SPCC1235.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.243	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360116	2539130	2539080	275702	275652	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1235.06	amk2	sif1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.177	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360117	2539130	2539043	275702	275616	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1235.08c	amk2	pdh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.174	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360118	2539130	2539169	275702	275740	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1235.11	amk2	mpc1	-	SPCC1235.11	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.362	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360119	2539130	2539040	275702	275613	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1259.02c	amk2	erm1	-	SPCC1259.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.556	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360120	2539130	2539078	275702	275650	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1259.04	amk2	iec3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.369	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360121	2539130	2539092	275702	275664	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1259.08	amk2	SPCC1259.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.339	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360122	2539130	2539081	275702	275653	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1259.09c	amk2	pdx1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.24	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360123	2539130	2539074	275702	275646	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1259.10	amk2	pgp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.841	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360124	2539130	2539087	275702	275659	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1259.13	amk2	chk1	-	rad27	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.36	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360125	2539130	2538871	275702	275450	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1259.14c	amk2	meu27	-	B8647-6	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.309	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360126	2539130	2538890	275702	275468	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1393.02c	amk2	spt2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.216	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360127	2539130	2538884	275702	275462	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1393.08	amk2	SPCC1393.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.277	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360128	2539130	2538698	275702	275283	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1442.02	amk2	SPCC1442.02	-	SPCC1450.18	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.753	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360129	2539130	2539132	275702	275704	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1442.15c	amk2	cox18	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.212	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360130	2539130	2539316	275702	275882	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1450.03	amk2	SPCC1450.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.16	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360131	2539130	2538692	275702	275277	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC162.04c	amk2	wtf13	-	wtf12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.163	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360132	2539130	2538993	275702	275567	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC162.12	amk2	tco89	-	SPCC1753.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.629	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360133	2539130	2539244	275702	275814	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1672.06c	amk2	asp1	-	vip1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.351	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360134	2539130	2539344	275702	275910	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1672.09	amk2	SPCC1672.09	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.151	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360135	2539130	2539233	275702	275803	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC16A11.03c	amk2	SPCC16A11.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.167	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360136	2539130	2538748	275702	275331	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC16A11.04	amk2	snx12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.152	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360137	2539130	2539368	275702	275934	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC16A11.07	amk2	coq10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.166	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360138	2539130	2539317	275702	275883	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC16A11.08	amk2	atg20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.187	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360139	2539130	2538968	275702	275542	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC16A11.15c	amk2	SPCC16A11.15c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.171	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360140	2539130	2539180	275702	275751	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC16C4.09	amk2	sts5	-	orb4	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.254	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360141	2539130	2538922	275702	275499	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC16C4.10	amk2	SPCC16C4.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.381	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360142	2539130	2538770	275702	275353	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1753.02c	amk2	git3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.367	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360143	2539130	2539219	275702	275789	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1795.01c	amk2	mad3	-	SPCC895.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.21	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360144	2539130	2539393	275702	275958	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1795.02c	amk2	vcx1	-	SPCC895.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.793	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360145	2539130	2538927	275702	275503	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC1795.09	amk2	yps1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.296	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360146	2539130	2538966	275702	275540	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC18.10	amk2	SPCC18.10	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.851	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360147	2539130	2539246	275702	275816	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC18.13	amk2	SPCC18.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.2	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360148	2539130	2539123	275702	275695	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC18B5.03	amk2	wee1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.362	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360149	2539130	2539177	275702	275748	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC18B5.09c	amk2	SPCC18B5.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.153	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360150	2539130	2539174	275702	275745	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC24B10.08c	amk2	ada2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.455	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360151	2539130	2539237	275702	275807	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC24B10.13	amk2	skb5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.16	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360152	2539130	2539350	275702	275916	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC24B10.17	amk2	emp24	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.233	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360153	2539130	2538907	275702	275484	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC24B10.19c	amk2	nts1	-	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.241	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360154	2539130	2539256	275702	275826	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC285.04	amk2	SPCC285.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.176	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360155	2539130	2538932	275702	275508	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC31H12.03c	amk2	tho1	-	SPCC31H12.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.202	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360156	2539130	2538697	275702	275282	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC320.12	amk2	atp23	-	SPCC330.17c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.883	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360157	2539130	2539519	275702	276081	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC364.05	amk2	vps3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.162	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360158	2539130	2539495	275702	276058	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC4F11.02	amk2	ptc1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.151	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360159	2539130	2539541	275702	276103	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC4G3.13c	amk2	SPCC4G3.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.177	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360160	2539130	2538765	275702	275348	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC548.04	amk2	urm1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.913	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360161	2539130	2539405	275702	275970	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC553.03	amk2	pex1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.176	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360162	2539130	2539557	275702	276118	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC553.04	amk2	cyp9	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.389	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360163	2539130	2538696	275702	275281	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC569.06	amk2	SPCC569.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.518	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360164	2539130	2538821	275702	275402	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC584.01c	amk2	SPCC584.01c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.156	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360165	2539130	2538998	275702	275572	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC594.02c	amk2	SPCC594.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.305	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360166	2539130	2538847	275702	275428	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC594.06c	amk2	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.18	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360167	2539130	2539363	275702	275929	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC613.02	amk2	SPCC613.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.162	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360168	2539130	2539464	275702	276027	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC613.06	amk2	rpl902	-	rpl9-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.372	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360169	2539130	2539584	275702	276143	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC63.03	amk2	SPCC63.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.196	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360170	2539130	2539506	275702	276069	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC63.04	amk2	mok14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.171	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360171	2539130	2538796	275702	275377	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC63.06	amk2	SPCC63.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.279	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360172	2539130	2539395	275702	275960	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC663.11	amk2	saf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.17	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360173	2539130	2539403	275702	275968	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC736.11	amk2	ago1	-	csp9	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.348	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360174	2539130	3361134	275702	280210	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC737.09c	amk2	hmt1	-	SPCC74.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.057	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360175	2539130	2539336	275702	275902	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC74.05	amk2	rpl2702	-	rpl27-2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.617	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360176	2539130	2539591	275702	276149	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC777.07	amk2	omh3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.161	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360177	2539130	2538726	275702	275310	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC777.09c	amk2	arg1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-1.908	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360178	2539130	2539416	275702	275981	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC777.10c	amk2	ubc12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.384	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360179	2539130	2539462	275702	276025	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC777.13	amk2	vps35	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.899	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360180	2539130	2539070	275702	275642	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC794.02	amk2	wtf5	-	wtf4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.17	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360181	2539130	2539297	275702	275865	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC794.15	amk2	SPCC794.15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.395	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360182	2539130	2538725	275702	275309	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC825.02	amk2	gbs1	-	SPCC825.02|gls2beta	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.333	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360183	2539130	2539448	275702	276011	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC825.04c	amk2	naa40	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.185	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360184	2539130	2539459	275702	276022	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC825.05c	amk2	pwi1	-	SPCC825.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.207	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360185	2539130	2538986	275702	275560	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC895.06	amk2	elp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.8	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360186	2539130	2539263	275702	275833	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC895.09c	amk2	ucp12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.201	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360187	2539130	2538760	275702	275343	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC970.01	amk2	rad16	-	rad10|rad20|swi9	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.159	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360188	2539130	2538908	275702	275485	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC970.02	amk2	SPCC970.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.164	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360189	2539130	2538883	275702	275461	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC970.05	amk2	rpl3601	-	rpl36-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	-0.151	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2360190	2539130	2539492	275702	276055	SPCC1919.03c	SPCPB16A4.06c	amk2	SPCPB16A4.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Rallis C (2017)	28281664	284812	284812	High Throughput	0.233	-	colony size	SGA was used to quantitatively scoregenetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had a score >= 0.15for positive interactions (epistatic or suppressor interactions)and S score <= -0.15for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethal interactions).	-	BIOGRID
2375878	2540083	2540744	276621	277267	SPBC119.02	SPBC1604.21c	ubc4	ptr3	-	SPBC211.09|uba1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lv Z (2017)	28572513	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	Ubc4 conjugated to ubiquitin via thiolester linkage in vitro|ubiquitin transthiolation	-	BIOGRID
2375879	2540744	2540744	277267	277267	SPBC1604.21c	SPBC1604.21c	ptr3	ptr3	SPBC211.09|uba1	SPBC211.09|uba1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lv Z (2017)	28572513	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	Ptr3 conjugated to ubiquitin via thiolester linkage in vitro|ubiquitin transthiolation	-	BIOGRID
2381254	2542094	2542001	278571	278485	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC20G8.06	rcd1	not1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Stowell JAW (2016)	27851962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2381255	2542094	2542126	278571	278602	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC1B3.05	rcd1	not3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Stowell JAW (2016)	27851962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2381256	2542094	2538913	278571	275490	SPAC29B12.06c	SPCC31H12.08c	rcd1	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Stowell JAW (2016)	27851962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2381257	2542094	2542325	278571	278791	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC16C9.04c	rcd1	mot2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Stowell JAW (2016)	27851962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2381258	2542094	2539540	278571	276102	SPAC29B12.06c	SPCC736.12c	rcd1	mmi1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Stowell JAW (2016)	27851962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2381259	2542094	2538778	278571	275359	SPAC29B12.06c	SPCC4G3.15c	rcd1	not2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Stowell JAW (2016)	27851962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2381260	2542094	2539041	278571	275614	SPAC29B12.06c	SPCC18.06c	rcd1	caf1	-	pop2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Stowell JAW (2016)	27851962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2381261	2539041	2538778	275614	275359	SPCC18.06c	SPCC4G3.15c	caf1	not2	pop2	-	Co-purification	physical	Stowell JAW (2016)	27851962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2381262	2539041	2542094	275614	278571	SPCC18.06c	SPAC29B12.06c	caf1	rcd1	pop2	-	Co-purification	physical	Stowell JAW (2016)	27851962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2381263	2539041	2542325	275614	278791	SPCC18.06c	SPAC16C9.04c	caf1	mot2	pop2	-	Co-purification	physical	Stowell JAW (2016)	27851962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2381264	2539041	2538913	275614	275490	SPCC18.06c	SPCC31H12.08c	caf1	ccr4	pop2	SPCC5E4.02c	Co-purification	physical	Stowell JAW (2016)	27851962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2381265	2539041	2542126	275614	278602	SPCC18.06c	SPAC1B3.05	caf1	not3	pop2	-	Co-purification	physical	Stowell JAW (2016)	27851962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2381266	2539041	2542001	275614	278485	SPCC18.06c	SPAC20G8.06	caf1	not1	pop2	-	Co-purification	physical	Stowell JAW (2016)	27851962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2381267	2539041	2539540	275614	276102	SPCC18.06c	SPCC736.12c	caf1	mmi1	pop2	-	Co-purification	physical	Stowell JAW (2016)	27851962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2381268	2539540	2540458	276102	276986	SPCC736.12c	SPBC29A10.14	mmi1	rec8	-	-	Protein-RNA	physical	Stowell JAW (2016)	27851962	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2384071	2543675	2542683	280089	279136	SPAC4D7.10c	SPAPYUG7.03c	spt20	mid2	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Lei B (2014)	25015293	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation	Figure 7|mid2+ overexpression rescues defect in septin ring assembly in spt20 mutant	-	BIOGRID
2388562	2541887	2542703	278377	279156	SPAC22E12.16c	SPAC26H5.06	pik1	pot1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sugihara A (2018)	29410177	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
2394197	2538689	1654	275274	108020	SPCC1795.11	-	sum3	DDX3X	ded1|moc2|slh3	CAP-Rf|DBX|DDX14|DDX3|HLP2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Epling LB (2015)	25724843	284812	9606	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2446241	2542717	2541030	279170	277545	SPAC25H1.04	SPBC337.08c	mug105	ubi4	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Hermanns T (2018)	29476094	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Deubiquitination	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2450734	2538736	2539499	275320	276062	SPCC1322.12c	SPCC622.08c	bub1	hta1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Ishiguro T (2018)	29769606	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2450735	2538736	2539499	275320	276062	SPCC1322.12c	SPCC622.08c	bub1	hta1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ishiguro T (2018)	29769606	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2454584	2543392	2540348	279814	276877	SPAC8F11.03	SPBC29A10.05	msh3	exo1	swi4	mut2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Villahermosa D (2017)	28341698	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency:partial rescue	The msh3/exo1 double mutant reverted significantly less frequently to Ade+ than either single mutant	-	BIOGRID
2454585	2543392	2543580	279814	279995	SPAC8F11.03	SPAC644.14c	msh3	rad51	swi4	rhp51	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Villahermosa D (2017)	28341698	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency:partial rescue	The double mutant show significantly lower mutation frequency than  either single mutant	-	BIOGRID
2454586	2540348	2543580	276877	279995	SPBC29A10.05	SPAC644.14c	exo1	rad51	mut2	rhp51	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Villahermosa D (2017)	28341698	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency:partial rescue	The double mutant show significantly lower mutation frequency than  either single mutant	-	BIOGRID
2454597	2540047	2541326	276585	277838	SPBC16C6.10	SPBP35G2.03c	chp2	sgo1	-	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Isaac RS (2017)	28942089	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2454598	2541633	2541326	278129	277838	SPAC664.01c	SPBP35G2.03c	swi6	sgo1	SPAC824.10c	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Isaac RS (2017)	28942089	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2454599	2540047	2540821	276585	277339	SPBC16C6.10	SPBC800.03	chp2	clr3	-	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Isaac RS (2017)	28942089	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2454600	2541633	2540821	278129	277339	SPAC664.01c	SPBC800.03	swi6	clr3	SPAC824.10c	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Isaac RS (2017)	28942089	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2454601	2540047	2542467	276585	278928	SPBC16C6.10	SPAC1834.04	chp2	hht1	-	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Isaac RS (2017)	28942089	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2454602	2541633	2542467	278129	278928	SPAC664.01c	SPAC1834.04	swi6	hht1	SPAC824.10c	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Isaac RS (2017)	28942089	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2454603	2540047	2540047	276585	276585	SPBC16C6.10	SPBC16C6.10	chp2	chp2	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Isaac RS (2017)	28942089	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2454604	2541633	2541633	278129	278129	SPAC664.01c	SPAC664.01c	swi6	swi6	SPAC824.10c	SPAC824.10c	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Isaac RS (2017)	28942089	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2454605	2540730	2541065	277253	277580	SPBC19C2.09	SPBC3B9.15c	sre1	scp1	-	scap	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Gong X (2016)	27811944	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2454606	2540730	2540730	277253	277253	SPBC19C2.09	SPBC19C2.09	sre1	sre1	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Gong X (2016)	27811944	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2454607	2540730	2541065	277253	277580	SPBC19C2.09	SPBC3B9.15c	sre1	scp1	-	scap	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Gong X (2016)	27811944	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	cryo-EM	-	BIOGRID
2454608	2542979	2539285	279417	275853	SPAPJ760.02c	SPCC1672.02c	abp1	sap1	app1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jorgensen MM (2018)	30026545	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	Mutations in Sap1 can rescue the growth defect of an abp1/cbh1 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2454609	2539971	2539285	276515	275853	SPBC1105.04c	SPCC1672.02c	cbp1	sap1	abp1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jorgensen MM (2018)	30026545	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	Mutations in Sap1 can rescue the growth defect of an abp1/cbh1 double mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2454610	2539285	2539285	275853	275853	SPCC1672.02c	SPCC1672.02c	sap1	sap1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Jorgensen MM (2018)	30026545	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2454754	2540825	2540825	277343	277343	SPBC428.08c	SPBC428.08c	clr4	clr4	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Iglesias N (2018)	30051891	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Methylation	-	auto-methylation	-	BIOGRID
2454755	2539481	2539403	276044	275968	SPCC622.16c	SPCC736.11	epe1	ago1	kdm2	csp9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Iglesias N (2018)	30051891	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	-	-	BIOGRID
2460028	2539482	2541599	276045	278096	SPCC417.06c	SPAC24B11.11c	mug27	sid2	ppk35|slk1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Imada K (2017)	28876998	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution	-	-	BIOGRID
2460753	2541021	3361548	277536	280624	SPBC3B8.10c	SPAC20G8.10c	nem1	atg6	-	SPAC3A12.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sajiki K (2018)	30116786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2460754	2541021	2540790	277536	277309	SPBC3B8.10c	SPBC6B1.05c	nem1	atg7	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sajiki K (2018)	30116786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2460755	2541021	2542459	277536	278920	SPBC3B8.10c	SPAC1D4.03c	nem1	aut12	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sajiki K (2018)	30116786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mitotic cell cycle	-	-	BIOGRID
2460756	2538852	2540557	275433	277084	SPCC4E9.01c	SPBC29A10.04	rec11	psm1	SPCC550.16c	smc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sanyal S (2018)	29898918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2460757	2538852	2543010	275433	279448	SPCC4E9.01c	SPAC10F6.09c	rec11	psm3	SPCC550.16c	smc3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sanyal S (2018)	29898918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2460758	2538852	2540458	275433	276986	SPCC4E9.01c	SPBC29A10.14	rec11	rec8	SPCC550.16c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sanyal S (2018)	29898918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2460759	2540557	2541620	277084	278117	SPBC29A10.04	SPAC2G11.12	psm1	rqh1	smc1	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanyal S (2018)	29898918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	double mutants show enhanced sensitivity to DNA damaging agents	-	BIOGRID
2460760	2540557	2541657	277084	278153	SPBC29A10.04	SPAP27G11.15	psm1	slx1	smc1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanyal S (2018)	29898918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	double mutants show enhanced sensitivity to DNA damaging agents	-	BIOGRID
2460761	2540557	2543577	277084	279992	SPBC29A10.04	SPAC4H3.05	psm1	srs2	smc1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanyal S (2018)	29898918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	double mutants show enhanced sensitivity to DNA damaging agents	-	BIOGRID
2460762	2540557	2540584	277084	277110	SPBC29A10.04	SPBC28F2.07	psm1	sfr1	smc1	dds20|mug13	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanyal S (2018)	29898918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	double mutants show enhanced sensitivity to DNA damaging agents	-	BIOGRID
2460763	2540557	2543685	277084	280099	SPBC29A10.04	SPAC3C7.03c	psm1	rad55	smc1	rhp55	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanyal S (2018)	29898918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	double mutants show enhanced sensitivity to DNA damaging agents	-	BIOGRID
2460764	2540557	2542007	277084	278490	SPBC29A10.04	SPAC20H4.07	psm1	rad57	smc1	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanyal S (2018)	29898918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	double mutants show enhanced sensitivity to DNA damaging agents	-	BIOGRID
2460765	2540557	2543086	277084	279519	SPBC29A10.04	SPAC30D11.10	psm1	rad52	smc1	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanyal S (2018)	29898918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	double mutants show enhanced sensitivity to DNA damaging agents	-	BIOGRID
2460766	2539447	2539004	276010	275578	SPCC338.17c	SPCC4G3.05c	rad21	mus81	-	slx3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanyal S (2018)	29898918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	double mutants show enhanced sensitivity to DNA damaging agents	-	BIOGRID
2460767	2539447	2543670	276010	280084	SPCC338.17c	SPAPB1E7.06c	rad21	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanyal S (2018)	29898918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	double mutants show enhanced sensitivity to DNA damaging agents	-	BIOGRID
2460768	2542387	2543670	278851	280084	SPAC17H9.20	SPAPB1E7.06c	psc3	eme1	SPAC607.01	mms4|slx2	Two-hybrid	physical	Sanyal S (2018)	29898918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2460769	2543010	2539004	279448	275578	SPAC10F6.09c	SPCC4G3.05c	psm3	mus81	smc3	slx3	Two-hybrid	physical	Sanyal S (2018)	29898918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2460770	2538852	2543670	275433	280084	SPCC4E9.01c	SPAPB1E7.06c	rec11	eme1	SPCC550.16c	mms4|slx2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sanyal S (2018)	29898918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2460771	2540557	2539004	277084	275578	SPBC29A10.04	SPCC4G3.05c	psm1	mus81	smc1	slx3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sanyal S (2018)	29898918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2460772	2540719	2542070	277242	278547	SPBC216.05	SPAC29B12.02c	rad3	set2	-	kmt3	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Lim KK (2018)	29635344	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	deletion of set2 can marginally suppress the sensitivity of a rad3 mutant to MMS	-	BIOGRID
2460776	2538959	2542070	275533	278547	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC29B12.02c	cds1	set2	-	kmt3	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Lim KK (2018)	29635344	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	deletion of set2 can marginally suppress the sensitivity of a cds1 mutant to MMS	-	BIOGRID
2460777	2542757	2542070	279207	278547	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC29B12.02c	mre11	set2	rad32	kmt3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Lim KK (2018)	29635344	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
2460778	2540679	2542070	277204	278547	SPBC3D6.10	SPAC29B12.02c	apn2	set2	-	kmt3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Lim KK (2018)	29635344	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
2460779	2543510	2542070	279928	278547	SPAC30D11.07	SPAC29B12.02c	nth1	set2	-	kmt3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Lim KK (2018)	29635344	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
2460780	2540679	2542467	277204	278928	SPBC3D6.10	SPAC1834.04	apn2	hht1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Lim KK (2018)	29635344	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
2460781	2542070	2539094	278547	275666	SPAC29B12.02c	SPCC330.02	set2	rhp7	kmt3	SPCC613.14	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Lim KK (2018)	29635344	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	set2 mutant MMS hypersensitivity was partially suppressed by rhp7 mutation	-	BIOGRID
2460782	2541045	2542070	277560	278547	SPBC543.03c	SPAC29B12.02c	pku80	set2	-	kmt3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Lim KK (2018)	29635344	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	double mutants show increased sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
2460783	2538959	2542070	275533	278547	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC29B12.02c	cds1	set2	-	kmt3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lim KK (2018)	29635344	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	-	-	BIOGRID
2460784	2540720	2541519	277243	278020	SPBC216.07c	SPAC227.07c	tor2	pab1	SPBC646.01c	ret1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Martin R (2017)	28041796	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:wild type	deletion of pab1 suppressed the mating defect of a tor2 overexpressing cells to the same level as for the WT strain	-	BIOGRID
2460785	2543339	2541519	279762	278020	SPAC630.13c	SPAC227.07c	tsc2	pab1	-	ret1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Martin R (2017)	28041796	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue|protein/peptide modification:partial rescue	deletion of pab1 partially suppressed the mating defect and mei2 expression defect of a tsc2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
2460787	2540720	2542961	277243	279401	SPBC216.07c	SPAC10F6.16	tor2	mug134	SPBC646.01c	igo1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Martin R (2017)	28041796	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue|protein/peptide modification:partial rescue	deletion of igo1 suppresses the phosphorylation of Gad8 and induction of mei2 seen in a tor2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
2460788	2542961	2543529	279401	279947	SPAC10F6.16	SPAC4C5.02c	mug134	ryh1	igo1	hos1|sat7	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Martin R (2017)	28041796	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue|protein/peptide modification:partial rescue	deletion of ryh1 suppresses the suppressing effects of an igo1 mutant in a tor2 mutant background	-	BIOGRID
2460791	2541519	2539206	278020	275776	SPAC227.07c	SPCC24B10.07	pab1	gad8	ret1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Martin R (2017)	28041796	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue	mutation inhibits the increased mating seen in a pab1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
2460792	2541519	2539703	278020	276256	SPAC227.07c	SPBC16G5.15c	pab1	fkh2	ret1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Martin R (2017)	28041796	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue	mutation inhibits the increased mating seen in a pab1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
2460793	2541519	2539206	278020	275776	SPAC227.07c	SPCC24B10.07	pab1	gad8	ret1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Martin R (2017)	28041796	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2460794	2541519	2540473	278020	277001	SPAC227.07c	SPBC30D10.10c	pab1	tor1	ret1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Martin R (2017)	28041796	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2460795	2539206	2542972	275776	279411	SPCC24B10.07	SPAPYUG7.02c	gad8	sin1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Martin R (2017)	28041796	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2460796	2540072	2539206	276610	275776	SPBC16H5.07c	SPCC24B10.07	ppa2	gad8	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Martin R (2017)	28041796	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Dephosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2460797	2539206	2539703	275776	276256	SPCC24B10.07	SPBC16G5.15c	gad8	fkh2	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Martin R (2017)	28041796	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2460823	2539123	2541590	275695	278087	SPCC18B5.03	SPAC57A10.02	wee1	cdr2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Allard CAH (2018)	29514920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2460824	2539123	2541590	275695	278087	SPCC18B5.03	SPAC57A10.02	wee1	cdr2	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Allard CAH (2018)	29514920	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2468747	2539869	2539778	276415	276328	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC15D4.01c	cdc2	klp9	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	SPBC2D10.21c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Fu C (2009)	19686686	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2468748	2542358	2539778	278823	276328	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC15D4.01c	clp1	klp9	flp1	SPBC2D10.21c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Fu C (2009)	19686686	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Dephosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2468749	2542358	2543372	278823	279794	SPAC1782.09c	SPAPB1A10.09	clp1	ase1	flp1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Fu C (2009)	19686686	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Dephosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2469124	2541193	2541889	277707	278379	SPBC776.02c	SPAC2F7.03c	dis2	pom1	bws1|sds1	-	PCA	physical	Hachet O (2011)	21703453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC)	-	BIOGRID
2469311	2540027	327826	276571	236497	SPBC1734.14c	-	suc1	Frs2	p13	4732458E18|C330018A15Rik|Frs2alpha|SNT1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Klint P (2004)	14709340	284812	10090	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2469321	2540027	233908	276571	231475	SPBC1734.14c	-	suc1	Fus	p13	D430004D17Rik|D930039C12Rik|Fus1|Tls	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Klint P (2004)	14709340	284812	10090	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2469476	2542299	3635137	278766	1217961	SPAC18B11.10	C1_10020W_A	tup11	SFU1	-	CAWG_00430|IPF19906.1|IPF22421.1|CA1201|CaO19.4869|orf19.12333|C1_10020W|Contig4-2622_0004|CaO19.12333|orf19.4869|C1_10020W_B|Contig4-2622_0003|IPF19906|orf6.2584|CaO6.2584	Two-hybrid	physical	Pelletier B (2007)	17724773	284812	237561	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2469477	2543402	3635137	279824	1217961	SPAC630.14c	C1_10020W_A	tup12	SFU1	-	CAWG_00430|IPF19906.1|IPF22421.1|CA1201|CaO19.4869|orf19.12333|C1_10020W|Contig4-2622_0004|CaO19.12333|orf19.4869|C1_10020W_B|Contig4-2622_0003|IPF19906|orf6.2584|CaO6.2584	Two-hybrid	physical	Pelletier B (2007)	17724773	284812	237561	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2470296	2541604	2540064	278101	276602	SPAC14C4.03	SPBC1718.02	mek1	hop1	-	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Xie C (2018)	30289413	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2474572	2540618	2540927	277144	277443	SPBC3D6.11c	SPBC365.06	slx8	pmt3	-	smt3|ubl2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nie M (2017)	28475613	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|resistance to chemicals:wild type|viability:wild type	genetic complex|mutation of sumo rescues the synthetic growth defects of an slx8/tdp1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
2474573	2540618	2541580	277144	278077	SPBC3D6.11c	SPAC1687.05	slx8	pli1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nie M (2017)	28475613	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|resistance to chemicals:wild type|viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2474574	2540618	2539579	277144	276138	SPBC3D6.11c	SPCP31B10.05	slx8	tdp1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nie M (2017)	28475613	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2474575	2539579	2540927	276138	277443	SPCP31B10.05	SPBC365.06	tdp1	pmt3	-	smt3|ubl2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nie M (2017)	28475613	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	genetic complex|mutation of sumo rescues the synthetic growth defects of an slx8/tdp1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
2474576	2540618	2540464	277144	276992	SPBC3D6.11c	SPBC23E6.02	slx8	rrp2	-	SPBC23E6.02	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nie M (2017)	28475613	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2474577	2542313	2541580	278779	278077	SPAC16A10.07c	SPAC1687.05	taz1	pli1	myb|myb1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nie M (2017)	28475613	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:wild type|viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2474578	2542313	2542378	278779	278842	SPAC16A10.07c	SPAC1805.04	taz1	nup132	myb|myb1	Nup133b	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nie M (2017)	28475613	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:wild type|viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2474579	2542313	2540927	278779	277443	SPAC16A10.07c	SPBC365.06	taz1	pmt3	myb|myb1	smt3|ubl2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nie M (2017)	28475613	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:wild type|viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2474580	2542313	2540618	278779	277144	SPAC16A10.07c	SPBC3D6.11c	taz1	slx8	myb|myb1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nie M (2017)	28475613	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:wild type|viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2474581	2542313	2539623	278779	276180	SPAC16A10.07c	SPBC16A3.09c	taz1	ufd1	myb|myb1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nie M (2017)	28475613	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:wild type|viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2494969	2543560	2542170	279976	278645	SPAC664.03	SPAC17G8.13c	paf1	mst2	SPAC664.03	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Flury V (2017)	28648780	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	-	-	BIOGRID
2494972	2542170	2539403	278645	275968	SPAC17G8.13c	SPCC736.11	mst2	ago1	-	csp9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Flury V (2017)	28648780	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution	-	-	BIOGRID
2494973	2542170	2538930	278645	275506	SPAC17G8.13c	SPCC188.13c	mst2	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Flury V (2017)	28648780	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution	-	-	BIOGRID
2494981	2542067	2542170	278544	278645	SPAC23D3.01	SPAC17G8.13c	pdp3	mst2	SPAC23D3.01	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Flury V (2017)	28648780	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	heterochromatin-silencing defects in the pdp3 mutant background were rescued by deleting mst2	-	BIOGRID
2494982	2543560	2542067	279976	278544	SPAC664.03	SPAC23D3.01	paf1	pdp3	SPAC664.03	SPAC23D3.01	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Flury V (2017)	28648780	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	-	-	BIOGRID
2494983	2543560	2542070	279976	278547	SPAC664.03	SPAC29B12.02c	paf1	set2	SPAC664.03	kmt3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Flury V (2017)	28648780	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	-	-	BIOGRID
2494984	2542170	2542067	278645	278544	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC23D3.01	mst2	pdp3	-	SPAC23D3.01	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Flury V (2017)	28648780	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	deletion abolishes the silencing seen in a tethered mst2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
2494985	2542170	2542070	278645	278547	SPAC17G8.13c	SPAC29B12.02c	mst2	set2	-	kmt3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Flury V (2017)	28648780	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	deletion abolishes the silencing seen in a tethered mst2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
2494987	2542170	2539102	278645	275674	SPAC17G8.13c	SPCC1919.15	mst2	brl1	-	SPCC790.01|rfp2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Flury V (2017)	28648780	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2512867	5802965	2543233	858103	279661	SPAC11H11.06	SPAC630.03	arp2	arp3	SPAC22F8.01	act2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Rodnick-Smith M (2016)	27417392	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2516483	2543068	2541386	279501	277897	SPAC30D11.06c	SPBP8B7.24c	hfl1	atg8	SPAC30D11.06c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Liu XM (2018)	30451685	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2516484	2543068	2541386	279501	277897	SPAC30D11.06c	SPBP8B7.24c	hfl1	atg8	SPAC30D11.06c	-	Co-localization	physical	Liu XM (2018)	30451685	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2516486	2543068	2541386	279501	277897	SPAC30D11.06c	SPBP8B7.24c	hfl1	atg8	SPAC30D11.06c	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Liu XM (2018)	30451685	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2516487	2543068	2541386	279501	277897	SPAC30D11.06c	SPBP8B7.24c	hfl1	atg8	SPAC30D11.06c	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Liu XM (2018)	30451685	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2516488	2543068	2541386	279501	277897	SPAC30D11.06c	SPBP8B7.24c	hfl1	atg8	SPAC30D11.06c	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Liu XM (2018)	30451685	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2516522	2540511	2539640	277039	276195	SPBC1718.01	SPBC32F12.09	pop1	rum1	SPBC2G2.18|ste16	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kominami K (1997)	9203581	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516523	2543233	2540051	279661	276589	SPAC630.03	SPBC32H8.12c	arp3	act1	act2	cps8|pi012	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Arai R (1998)	9765059	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516524	2540051	2543233	276589	279661	SPBC32H8.12c	SPAC630.03	act1	arp3	cps8|pi012	act2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Arai R (1998)	9765059	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516525	2541940	2540051	278427	276589	SPAC27F1.02c	SPBC32H8.12c	cdc8	act1	fus4	cps8|pi012	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Arai R (1998)	9765059	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516526	2539898	2543593	276444	280008	SPBC12D12.07c	SPAC4G9.10	trx2	arg3	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Song JY (2008)	18849471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516527	2539303	2539974	275871	276518	SPCC1020.09	SPBC32H8.07	gnr1	git5	-	gpb1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Goddard A (2006)	16884933	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516528	2543298	2542200	279723	278675	SPAC6B12.15	SPAC19D5.01	cpc2	pyp2	rkp1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mos M (2013)	23843946	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516529	2539645	2538832	276200	275413	SPBC146.07	SPCC962.06c	prp2	bpb1	mis11|ods1|uaf1	sf1|ods3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Huang T (2002)	12374752	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516530	2542482	2539645	278942	276200	SPAP8A3.06	SPBC146.07	uaf2	prp2	SPAP8A3.06|ods2	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Huang T (2002)	12374752	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516531	2542482	2538832	278942	275413	SPAP8A3.06	SPCC962.06c	uaf2	bpb1	SPAP8A3.06|ods2	sf1|ods3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Huang T (2002)	12374752	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516532	2543449	2539658	279869	276213	SPAPB1A10.02	SPBC1105.17	scm3	cnp1	-	sim2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Williams JS (2009)	19217403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516533	2543449	2543449	279869	279869	SPAPB1A10.02	SPAPB1A10.02	scm3	scm3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Williams JS (2009)	19217403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516534	2538763	2538763	275346	275346	SPCC970.12	SPCC970.12	mis18	mis18	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Williams JS (2009)	19217403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516535	2540239	2539280	276771	275848	SPBC32H8.10	SPCC330.10	cdk9	pcm1	SPACTOKYO_453.22	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Viladevall L (2009)	19328067	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516536	2540239	2540471	276771	276999	SPBC32H8.10	SPBC19F8.07	cdk9	mcs6	SPACTOKYO_453.22	cdk7|crk1|mop1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Viladevall L (2009)	19328067	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516537	2540887	2538760	277404	275343	SPBC4F6.15c	SPCC970.01	swi10	rad16	rad23	rad10|rad20|swi9	Two-hybrid	physical	Carr AM (1994)	8114734	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516538	2539123	2543539	275695	279956	SPCC18B5.03	SPAC926.04c	wee1	hsp90	-	git10|swo1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Aligue R (1994)	7813446	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516539	2539123	2543539	275695	279956	SPCC18B5.03	SPAC926.04c	wee1	hsp90	-	git10|swo1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Aligue R (1994)	7813446	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516540	2539155	2538736	275727	275320	SPCC1020.02	SPCC1322.12c	spc7	bub1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Shepperd LA (2012)	22521786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516541	2542761	2540660	279211	277185	SPAC1565.06c	SPBC21.06c	spg1	cdc7	sid3	its10|pld1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Balasubramanian MK (1998)	9649519	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516542	2542761	2540650	279211	277175	SPAC1565.06c	SPBC244.01c	spg1	sid4	sid3	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Balasubramanian MK (1998)	9649519	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516543	2542090	2541089	278567	277604	SPAC25G10.08	SPBC646.09c	SPAC25G10.08	int6	p116	yin6	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Crane R (2000)	11071922	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516544	2542482	2542482	278942	278942	SPAP8A3.06	SPAP8A3.06	uaf2	uaf2	SPAP8A3.06|ods2	SPAP8A3.06|ods2	Two-hybrid	physical	Wentz-Hunter K (1996)	8657565	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516545	2541199	2540024	277713	276568	SPBC839.08c	SPBP4H10.04	its8	ppb1	-	SPBC1346.01c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yada T (2001)	11297516	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516546	2541199	2540737	277713	277260	SPBC839.08c	SPBC19G7.05c	its8	bgs1	-	cps1|drc1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yada T (2001)	11297516	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516547	2540345	2538860	276874	275440	SPBC19C7.09c	SPCC330.01c	uve1	rhp16	uvde	SPCC613.13c|rad16	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Lombaerts M (1999)	10446227	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516548	2540345	2539094	276874	275666	SPBC19C7.09c	SPCC330.02	uve1	rhp7	uvde	SPCC613.14	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Lombaerts M (1999)	10446227	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516549	2541888	9407128	278378	1028491	SPAC2E12.02	SPBP35G2.16c	hsf1	ecl2	hsf|hstf	SPNGAF61	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ohtsuka H (2010)	21072667	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516550	2542313	2540353	278779	276882	SPAC16A10.07c	SPBC2F12.12c	taz1	cay1	myb|myb1	SPBC2F12.12c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lorenzi LE (2015)	25398909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516551	2540353	2542144	276882	278620	SPBC2F12.12c	SPAC6F6.17	cay1	rif1	SPBC2F12.12c	SPAPJ736.01|tap1|tap11	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lorenzi LE (2015)	25398909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516552	2540353	2540115	276882	276652	SPBC2F12.12c	SPBC1778.02	cay1	rap1	SPBC2F12.12c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lorenzi LE (2015)	25398909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516553	2540353	2542313	276882	278779	SPBC2F12.12c	SPAC16A10.07c	cay1	taz1	SPBC2F12.12c	myb|myb1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Lorenzi LE (2015)	25398909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516554	2540353	2542313	276882	278779	SPBC2F12.12c	SPAC16A10.07c	cay1	taz1	SPBC2F12.12c	myb|myb1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Lorenzi LE (2015)	25398909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516555	2540353	2540115	276882	276652	SPBC2F12.12c	SPBC1778.02	cay1	rap1	SPBC2F12.12c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Lorenzi LE (2015)	25398909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516556	2540353	2540115	276882	276652	SPBC2F12.12c	SPBC1778.02	cay1	rap1	SPBC2F12.12c	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Lorenzi LE (2015)	25398909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516557	2541116	3361358	277631	280434	SPBC609.04	SPBC3F6.03	caf5	trr1	-	caf4	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Calvo IA (2009)	19672306	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516558	3361358	2541116	280434	277631	SPBC3F6.03	SPBC609.04	trr1	caf5	caf4	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Calvo IA (2009)	19672306	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516559	2539195	3361358	275766	280434	SPCC18B5.01c	SPBC3F6.03	bfr1	trr1	SPCPJ732.04c|hba2	caf4	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Calvo IA (2009)	19672306	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516560	2542083	2540008	278560	276552	SPAC27E2.05	SPBC12D12.02c	cdc1	cdm1	mis1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Zuo S (2000)	10671561	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516561	2542083	2539627	278560	276184	SPAC27E2.05	SPBC1734.02c	cdc1	cdc27	mis1	SPBC337.18c	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Zuo S (2000)	10671561	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516562	2542083	2540255	278560	276786	SPAC27E2.05	SPBC336.04	cdc1	cdc6	mis1	mis10|pol3|pold	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Zuo S (2000)	10671561	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516563	2540008	2539627	276552	276184	SPBC12D12.02c	SPBC1734.02c	cdm1	cdc27	-	SPBC337.18c	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Zuo S (2000)	10671561	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516564	2540008	2540255	276552	276786	SPBC12D12.02c	SPBC336.04	cdm1	cdc6	-	mis10|pol3|pold	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Zuo S (2000)	10671561	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516565	2539627	2540255	276184	276786	SPBC1734.02c	SPBC336.04	cdc27	cdc6	SPBC337.18c	mis10|pol3|pold	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Zuo S (2000)	10671561	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516566	2540821	2541633	277339	278129	SPBC800.03	SPAC664.01c	clr3	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hansen KR (2011)	21253571	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516567	2542669	2538930	279122	275506	SPAC29B12.08	SPCC188.13c	clr5	dcr1	SPAC29B12.08	SPCC584.10c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hansen KR (2011)	21253571	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516568	2540612	2542285	277138	278753	SPBC1D7.05	SPAC17H9.09c	byr2	ras1	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	ste5	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Gronwald W (2001)	11709167	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516569	2540329	2540902	276859	277418	SPBC29B5.01	SPBC582.04c	atf1	dsh1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	SPBC582.04c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kawakami K (2012)	22895252	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516570	3361487	2542140	280563	278616	SPAC1805.17	SPAC1783.07c	crm1	pap1	SPAC1B2.01|caf2	caf3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Toda T (1992)	1448080	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516571	3361487	2543198	280563	279627	SPAC1805.17	SPAC31A2.11c	crm1	cuf1	SPAC1B2.01|caf2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Beaudoin J (2007)	17384198	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516572	5802740	2543462	857878	279882	SPNCRNA.103	SPAC644.16	sme2	SPAC644.16	SPNCRNA.1341	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Yamanaka S (2010)	20512112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516573	2539540	2539733	276102	276285	SPCC736.12c	SPBC16E9.12c	mmi1	pab2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Yamanaka S (2010)	20512112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516574	2539540	2543462	276102	279882	SPCC736.12c	SPAC644.16	mmi1	SPAC644.16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Yamanaka S (2010)	20512112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516575	2539540	2543462	276102	279882	SPCC736.12c	SPAC644.16	mmi1	SPAC644.16	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yamanaka S (2010)	20512112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516576	2540027	2542632	276571	279086	SPBC1734.14c	SPAC24H6.05	suc1	cdc25	p13	sal2	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Odaert B (2002)	11812792	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516577	2540917	2542810	277433	279258	SPBC409.05	SPAC6F6.02c	skp1	pof5	psh1|sph1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Ikebe C (2002)	11820777	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516578	2540917	2542972	277433	279411	SPBC409.05	SPAPYUG7.02c	skp1	sin1	psh1|sph1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Ikebe C (2002)	11820777	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516579	2540917	2539929	277433	276473	SPBC409.05	SPBC1539.01c	skp1	SPBC1539.01c	psh1|sph1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Ikebe C (2002)	11820777	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516580	2540917	2541017	277433	277532	SPBC409.05	SPBC36.07	skp1	elp1	psh1|sph1	iki3	Two-hybrid	physical	Ikebe C (2002)	11820777	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516581	2543666	2542632	280080	279086	SPAC644.06c	SPAC24H6.05	cdr1	cdc25	nim1	sal2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Feilotter H (1991)	2004705	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516582	2543666	2539869	280080	276415	SPAC644.06c	SPBC11B10.09	cdr1	cdc2	nim1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Feilotter H (1991)	2004705	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516583	2543666	2540880	280080	277397	SPAC644.06c	SPBC582.03	cdr1	cdc13	nim1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Feilotter H (1991)	2004705	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516584	2542632	2543666	279086	280080	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC644.06c	cdc25	cdr1	sal2	nim1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Feilotter H (1991)	2004705	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516585	2543666	2539869	280080	276415	SPAC644.06c	SPBC11B10.09	cdr1	cdc2	nim1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Feilotter H (1991)	2004705	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516586	2541975	2541603	278460	278100	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC1F5.04c	cdc15	cdc12	-	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Willet AH (2015)	25688133	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516587	2539205	2541603	275775	278100	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC1F5.04c	mid1	cdc12	dmf1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Willet AH (2015)	25688133	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516588	2539513	2541603	276075	278100	SPCC645.05c	SPAC1F5.04c	myo2	cdc12	rng5	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Willet AH (2015)	25688133	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516589	2543129	2541603	279561	278100	SPAC4F8.13c	SPAC1F5.04c	rng2	cdc12	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Willet AH (2015)	25688133	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516590	2541603	2541975	278100	278460	SPAC1F5.04c	SPAC20G8.05c	cdc12	cdc15	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Willet AH (2015)	25688133	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516592	2539197	2539197	275768	275768	SPCC24B10.14c	SPCC24B10.14c	xlf1	xlf1	mug104|nej1	mug104|nej1	Co-fractionation	physical	Hentges P (2006)	17038309	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516593	2538930	2539481	275506	276044	SPCC188.13c	SPCC622.16c	dcr1	epe1	SPCC584.10c	kdm2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Wang J (2015)	25774602	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516594	2538930	2542170	275506	278645	SPCC188.13c	SPAC17G8.13c	dcr1	mst2	SPCC584.10c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Wang J (2015)	25774602	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516595	2539481	2540077	276044	276615	SPCC622.16c	SPBC17D11.04c	epe1	nto1	kdm2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang J (2015)	25774602	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516596	2539847	3361532	276395	280608	SPBC530.14c	SPAC1D4.11c	dsk1	lkh1	-	kic1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tang Z (2000)	10629038	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516597	2541592	2540307	278089	276837	SPAC6F12.15c	SPBC1A4.01	cut9	apc10	dre1	SPBC1E8.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schwickart M (2004)	15060174	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516598	2541592	2540655	278089	277180	SPAC6F12.15c	SPBC83.04	cut9	apc15	dre1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schwickart M (2004)	15060174	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516599	2541592	2542880	278089	279325	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC6F12.14	cut9	cut23	dre1	apc8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schwickart M (2004)	15060174	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516600	2541592	2542438	278089	278900	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC17C9.01c	cut9	nuc2	dre1	SPAC1851.01|apc3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schwickart M (2004)	15060174	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516601	2541592	2543187	278089	279616	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC343.03	cut9	apc11	dre1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schwickart M (2004)	15060174	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516602	2541592	3361204	278089	280280	SPAC6F12.15c	SPBP23A10.04	cut9	apc2	dre1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schwickart M (2004)	15060174	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516603	2541592	2539639	278089	276194	SPAC6F12.15c	SPBC106.09	cut9	cut4	dre1	apc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schwickart M (2004)	15060174	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516604	2541592	2540285	278089	276816	SPAC6F12.15c	SPBC28E12.01c	cut9	apc13	dre1	SPBC9B6.12c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schwickart M (2004)	15060174	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516605	2541592	2543355	278089	279777	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC959.09c	cut9	apc5	dre1	SPAP32A8.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schwickart M (2004)	15060174	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516606	2541592	2542211	278089	278685	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC27D7.05c	cut9	apc14	dre1	omt1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schwickart M (2004)	15060174	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516607	2541592	2542615	278089	279069	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC19G12.01c	cut9	cut20	dre1	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schwickart M (2004)	15060174	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516608	2541592	2542045	278089	278526	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC23C11.12	cut9	hcn1	dre1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schwickart M (2004)	15060174	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516609	2539579	2540692	276138	277217	SPCP31B10.05	SPBC800.07c	tdp1	tsf1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ben Hassine S (2009)	19197239	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516610	2539908	2539908	276454	276454	SPBC13E7.06	SPBC13E7.06	msd1	msd1	mug172	mug172	Two-hybrid	physical	Yukawa M (2015)	25987607	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516611	2539908	2540228	276454	276760	SPBC13E7.06	SPBC32H8.09	msd1	SPBC32H8.09	mug172	pi015|SPACTOKYO_453.21c	Two-hybrid	physical	Yukawa M (2015)	25987607	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516612	2540228	2539908	276760	276454	SPBC32H8.09	SPBC13E7.06	SPBC32H8.09	msd1	pi015|SPACTOKYO_453.21c	mug172	Two-hybrid	physical	Yukawa M (2015)	25987607	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516613	2540228	2542732	276760	279182	SPBC32H8.09	SPAC25G10.07c	SPBC32H8.09	cut7	pi015|SPACTOKYO_453.21c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Yukawa M (2015)	25987607	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516614	2539908	2542732	276454	279182	SPBC13E7.06	SPAC25G10.07c	msd1	cut7	mug172	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Yukawa M (2015)	25987607	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516615	2542732	2539908	279182	276454	SPAC25G10.07c	SPBC13E7.06	cut7	msd1	-	mug172	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Yukawa M (2015)	25987607	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516616	2542732	2540228	279182	276760	SPAC25G10.07c	SPBC32H8.09	cut7	SPBC32H8.09	-	pi015|SPACTOKYO_453.21c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Yukawa M (2015)	25987607	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516617	2539908	2542655	276454	279109	SPBC13E7.06	SPAC3A11.14c	msd1	pkl1	mug172	SPAC3H5.03c|klp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yukawa M (2015)	25987607	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516618	2539908	2540228	276454	276760	SPBC13E7.06	SPBC32H8.09	msd1	SPBC32H8.09	mug172	pi015|SPACTOKYO_453.21c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yukawa M (2015)	25987607	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516619	2540228	2539908	276760	276454	SPBC32H8.09	SPBC13E7.06	SPBC32H8.09	msd1	pi015|SPACTOKYO_453.21c	mug172	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yukawa M (2015)	25987607	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516620	2540228	2542655	276760	279109	SPBC32H8.09	SPAC3A11.14c	SPBC32H8.09	pkl1	pi015|SPACTOKYO_453.21c	SPAC3H5.03c|klp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yukawa M (2015)	25987607	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516621	2542655	2539908	279109	276454	SPAC3A11.14c	SPBC13E7.06	pkl1	msd1	SPAC3H5.03c|klp1	mug172	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yukawa M (2015)	25987607	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516622	2542655	2540228	279109	276760	SPAC3A11.14c	SPBC32H8.09	pkl1	SPBC32H8.09	SPAC3H5.03c|klp1	pi015|SPACTOKYO_453.21c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yukawa M (2015)	25987607	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516623	2539908	2540392	276454	276920	SPBC13E7.06	SPBC365.15	msd1	alp4	mug172	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Yukawa M (2015)	25987607	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516624	2540392	2540690	276920	277215	SPBC365.15	SPBC428.20c	alp4	alp6	-	SPBC902.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Yukawa M (2015)	25987607	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516625	2541772	2541772	278266	278266	SPAC22E12.03c	SPAC22E12.03c	hsp3106	hsp3106	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516626	2541772	5802781	278266	857919	SPAC22E12.03c	SPBC18H10.13	hsp3106	rps1402	SPAC22E12.03c|spDJ-1	rps14-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Mathiassen SG (2015)	26152728	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516627	2539197	2538706	275768	275290	SPCC24B10.14c	SPCC338.08	xlf1	ctp1	mug104|nej1	mug38|nip1|slr9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hentges P (2014)	25533340	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516628	2542808	2541957	279256	278444	SPAC15E1.07c	SPAC23C11.16	moa1	plo1	mug159	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kim J (2015)	25533956	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516629	2542808	2541957	279256	278444	SPAC15E1.07c	SPAC23C11.16	moa1	plo1	mug159	-	Co-purification	physical	Kim J (2015)	25533956	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516630	2542808	2541957	279256	278444	SPAC15E1.07c	SPAC23C11.16	moa1	plo1	mug159	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Kim J (2015)	25533956	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516631	2541957	2542403	278444	278867	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC19A8.05c	plo1	sst4	-	vps27	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516632	2541957	3361461	278444	280537	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC11H11.01	plo1	sst6	-	cps23	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516633	2541957	2542429	278444	278891	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC1B3.07c	plo1	vps28	-	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516634	2541957	2540828	278444	277346	SPAC23C11.16	SPBC4B4.06	plo1	vps25	-	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516635	2541957	2540725	278444	277248	SPAC23C11.16	SPBC215.14c	plo1	vps20	-	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516636	2541957	2542054	278444	278533	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC2G11.06	plo1	vps4	-	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516637	2541957	2543521	278444	279939	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC4F8.01	plo1	did4	-	SPAC644.03c|vps2	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516638	3361036	2542403	280112	278867	SPCC320.13c	SPAC19A8.05c	ark1	sst4	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	vps27	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516639	3361036	2540981	280112	277497	SPCC320.13c	SPBC3B9.09	ark1	vps36	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516640	3361036	2540725	280112	277248	SPCC320.13c	SPBC215.14c	ark1	vps20	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516641	3361036	2542054	280112	278533	SPCC320.13c	SPAC2G11.06	ark1	vps4	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516642	2542358	2543521	278823	279939	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC4F8.01	clp1	did4	flp1	SPAC644.03c|vps2	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516643	2542358	2542403	278823	278867	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC19A8.05c	clp1	sst4	flp1	vps27	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516644	2542358	3361461	278823	280537	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC11H11.01	clp1	sst6	flp1	cps23	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516645	2542358	2540725	278823	277248	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC215.14c	clp1	vps20	flp1	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516646	2542358	2542054	278823	278533	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC2G11.06	clp1	vps4	flp1	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516647	2542358	2540981	278823	277497	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC3B9.09	clp1	vps36	flp1	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516648	2542358	2542922	278823	279363	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC1142.07c	clp1	vps32	flp1	snf7	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516649	2542358	2542429	278823	278891	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC1B3.07c	clp1	vps28	flp1	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516650	2541957	2542403	278444	278867	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC19A8.05c	plo1	sst4	-	vps27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516651	2541957	3361461	278444	280537	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC11H11.01	plo1	sst6	-	cps23	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516652	2541957	2540981	278444	277497	SPAC23C11.16	SPBC3B9.09	plo1	vps36	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516653	2541957	2540828	278444	277346	SPAC23C11.16	SPBC4B4.06	plo1	vps25	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516654	2541957	2540725	278444	277248	SPAC23C11.16	SPBC215.14c	plo1	vps20	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516655	2541957	2542922	278444	279363	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC1142.07c	plo1	vps32	-	snf7	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516656	2541957	2542054	278444	278533	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC2G11.06	plo1	vps4	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516657	3361036	2542403	280112	278867	SPCC320.13c	SPAC19A8.05c	ark1	sst4	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	vps27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516658	3361036	3361461	280112	280537	SPCC320.13c	SPAC11H11.01	ark1	sst6	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	cps23	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516659	3361036	2542429	280112	278891	SPCC320.13c	SPAC1B3.07c	ark1	vps28	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516660	3361036	2540981	280112	277497	SPCC320.13c	SPBC3B9.09	ark1	vps36	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516661	3361036	2540828	280112	277346	SPCC320.13c	SPBC4B4.06	ark1	vps25	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516662	3361036	2540725	280112	277248	SPCC320.13c	SPBC215.14c	ark1	vps20	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516663	3361036	2542922	280112	279363	SPCC320.13c	SPAC1142.07c	ark1	vps32	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	snf7	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516664	3361036	2543521	280112	279939	SPCC320.13c	SPAC4F8.01	ark1	did4	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	SPAC644.03c|vps2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516665	3361036	2542054	280112	278533	SPCC320.13c	SPAC2G11.06	ark1	vps4	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516666	2542358	2542403	278823	278867	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC19A8.05c	clp1	sst4	flp1	vps27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516667	2542358	2542429	278823	278891	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC1B3.07c	clp1	vps28	flp1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516668	2542358	2540981	278823	277497	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC3B9.09	clp1	vps36	flp1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516669	2542358	2540828	278823	277346	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC4B4.06	clp1	vps25	flp1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516670	2542358	2540725	278823	277248	SPAC1782.09c	SPBC215.14c	clp1	vps20	flp1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516671	2542358	2542922	278823	279363	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC1142.07c	clp1	vps32	flp1	snf7	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516672	2542358	2543521	278823	279939	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC4F8.01	clp1	did4	flp1	SPAC644.03c|vps2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516673	2542358	2542429	278823	278891	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC1B3.07c	clp1	vps28	flp1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516674	3361036	2540725	280112	277248	SPCC320.13c	SPBC215.14c	ark1	vps20	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516675	3361036	2542922	280112	279363	SPCC320.13c	SPAC1142.07c	ark1	vps32	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	snf7	Two-hybrid	physical	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516676	2541957	2542403	278444	278867	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC19A8.05c	plo1	sst4	-	vps27	Two-hybrid	physical	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516677	2541957	2542429	278444	278891	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC1B3.07c	plo1	vps28	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516678	2541957	2540828	278444	277346	SPAC23C11.16	SPBC4B4.06	plo1	vps25	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516679	2541957	2540725	278444	277248	SPAC23C11.16	SPBC215.14c	plo1	vps20	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516680	2541957	2542922	278444	279363	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC1142.07c	plo1	vps32	-	snf7	Two-hybrid	physical	Bhutta MS (2014)	25356547	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516681	2542150	3361533	278626	280609	SPAC17A5.11	SPAC222.15	rec12	meu13	spo11	SPAC821.01	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nabeshima K (2001)	11447128	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516682	2538734	2539479	275318	276042	SPCC1322.13	SPCC584.04	ade6	sup35	min1	erf3	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Protacio RU (2015)	25519804	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516683	2538734	3361121	275318	280197	SPCC1322.13	SPCTRNASER.11	ade6	SPCTRNASER.11	min1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Protacio RU (2015)	25519804	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516684	2542744	2539623	279194	276180	SPAC1565.08	SPBC16A3.09c	cdc48	ufd1	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Marinova IN (2015)	25658828	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516685	2540473	2542972	277001	279411	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAPYUG7.02c	tor1	sin1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hatano T (2015)	25590601	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516686	2540473	2540645	277001	277170	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC21B10.05c	tor1	pop3	-	wat1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hatano T (2015)	25590601	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516687	2540473	2539845	277001	276393	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBC12C2.02c	tor1	ste20	-	ste16	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hatano T (2015)	25590601	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516688	2540580	3361384	277106	280460	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC12G12.13c	ran1	cid14	pat1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Win TZ (2006)	16478992	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516690	2540334	2542635	276864	279089	SPBC29A3.17	SPAC24H6.09	gef3	gef1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang N (2015)	25411334	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516691	2540334	2540127	276864	276664	SPBC29A3.17	SPBC106.20	gef3	exo70	-	SPBC582.02	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang N (2015)	25411334	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516692	2540334	2539358	276864	275924	SPBC29A3.17	SPCC16C4.07	gef3	scw1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang N (2015)	25411334	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516693	2540334	2539407	276864	275972	SPBC29A3.17	SPCC970.09	gef3	sec8	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang N (2015)	25411334	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516694	2540334	3361476	276864	280552	SPBC29A3.17	SPAC16A10.04	gef3	rho4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang N (2015)	25411334	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516695	2540334	2543516	276864	279934	SPBC29A3.17	SPAC4F10.11	gef3	spn1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang N (2015)	25411334	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516696	3361476	2540127	280552	276664	SPAC16A10.04	SPBC106.20	rho4	exo70	-	SPBC582.02	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang N (2015)	25411334	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516697	3361476	2542635	280552	279089	SPAC16A10.04	SPAC24H6.09	rho4	gef1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang N (2015)	25411334	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516698	3361476	2539407	280552	275972	SPAC16A10.04	SPCC970.09	rho4	sec8	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang N (2015)	25411334	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516699	3361476	2539358	280552	275924	SPAC16A10.04	SPCC16C4.07	rho4	scw1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang N (2015)	25411334	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516700	3361511	2539358	280587	275924	SPAC23C4.08	SPCC16C4.07	rho3	scw1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang N (2015)	25411334	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516701	2541302	2539655	277814	276210	SPBP26C9.03c	SPBC16D10.06	fet4	zrt1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dainty SJ (2008)	18203864	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516702	2543412	2541089	279834	277604	SPAC637.07	SPBC646.09c	moe1	int6	-	yin6	Two-hybrid	physical	Yen HC (2000)	11121040	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516703	2539568	2539568	276128	276128	SPCC663.05c	SPCC663.05c	cia1	cia1	asf1	asf1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Tanae K (2012)	22291963	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516704	2539130	5802929	275702	858067	SPCC1919.03c	SPAC1556.08c	amk2	cbs2	-	SPAC1F12.01c	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Townley R (2007)	17289942	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516705	2539130	2539109	275702	275681	SPCC1919.03c	SPCC74.03c	amk2	ssp2	-	ucp9	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Townley R (2007)	17289942	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516706	2540329	2542140	276859	278616	SPBC29B5.01	SPAC1783.07c	atf1	pap1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	caf3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Chung WH (2004)	15358115	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516707	2541936	2539970	278423	276514	SPAC222.10c	SPBC1773.01	byr4	far8	-	SPBC1773.01|csc3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Rachfall N (2014)	24920823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516708	2542162	2541936	278638	278423	SPAC6F6.08c	SPAC222.10c	cdc16	byr4	bub2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Rachfall N (2014)	24920823	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516709	2542047	2540258	278528	276789	SPAC21E11.03c	SPBC32C12.02	pcr1	ste11	mts2	aff1|stex	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Watanabe Y (1996)	8552099	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516710	2539781	2542047	276331	278528	SPBC106.10	SPAC21E11.03c	pka1	pcr1	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	mts2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Watanabe Y (1996)	8552099	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516711	2542796	2539087	279244	275659	SPAC1687.04	SPCC1259.13	mcb1	chk1	-	rad27	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ding L (2011)	21813639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516712	2542796	2540719	279244	277242	SPAC1687.04	SPBC216.05	mcb1	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ding L (2011)	21813639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516713	2542632	2542677	279086	279130	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC26F1.10c	cdc25	pyp1	sal2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Millar JB (1992)	1464319	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516714	2540234	2541153	276766	277668	SPBC336.12c	SPBC725.16	cdc10	res1	-	sct1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Tanaka K (1992)	1464317	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516715	2540580	2541153	277106	277668	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC725.16	ran1	res1	pat1	sct1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Tanaka K (1992)	1464317	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516716	2540580	2542103	277106	278579	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC31G5.11	ran1	pac2	pat1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Tanaka K (1992)	1464317	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516717	2543629	2541695	280043	278191	SPAC3H5.06c	SPAC1F7.05	pol1	cdc22	polA|swi7	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bhaumik D (1998)	9693370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516718	2543629	2542632	280043	279086	SPAC3H5.06c	SPAC24H6.05	pol1	cdc25	polA|swi7	sal2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bhaumik D (1998)	9693370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516719	2543629	2540627	280043	277153	SPAC3H5.06c	SPBC25H2.13c	pol1	cdc20	polA|swi7	pol2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bhaumik D (1998)	9693370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516720	2543629	2540234	280043	276766	SPAC3H5.06c	SPBC336.12c	pol1	cdc10	polA|swi7	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bhaumik D (1998)	9693370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516721	2543629	2539087	280043	275659	SPAC3H5.06c	SPCC1259.13	pol1	chk1	polA|swi7	rad27	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bhaumik D (1998)	9693370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516722	2543629	2541849	280043	278340	SPAC3H5.06c	SPAC20G8.01	pol1	cdc17	polA|swi7	SPAC57A10.13c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bhaumik D (1998)	9693370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516723	2543629	2540255	280043	276786	SPAC3H5.06c	SPBC336.04	pol1	cdc6	polA|swi7	mis10|pol3|pold	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bhaumik D (1998)	9693370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516724	2543629	2538959	280043	275533	SPAC3H5.06c	SPCC18B5.11c	pol1	cds1	polA|swi7	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bhaumik D (1998)	9693370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516725	2543629	2541643	280043	278139	SPAC3H5.06c	SPAC14C4.13	pol1	rad17	polA|swi7	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bhaumik D (1998)	9693370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516726	2543629	2542558	280043	279014	SPAC3H5.06c	SPAC1952.07	pol1	rad1	polA|swi7	rad19	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bhaumik D (1998)	9693370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516727	2543629	2541620	280043	278117	SPAC3H5.06c	SPAC2G11.12	pol1	rqh1	polA|swi7	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bhaumik D (1998)	9693370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516728	2543629	2543544	280043	279961	SPAC3H5.06c	SPAC664.07c	pol1	rad9	polA|swi7	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bhaumik D (1998)	9693370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516729	2543629	2543289	280043	279714	SPAC3H5.06c	SPAC9E9.08	pol1	rad26	polA|swi7	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bhaumik D (1998)	9693370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516730	2543629	2540719	280043	277242	SPAC3H5.06c	SPBC216.05	pol1	rad3	polA|swi7	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bhaumik D (1998)	9693370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516731	2543629	2538959	280043	275533	SPAC3H5.06c	SPCC18B5.11c	pol1	cds1	polA|swi7	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bhaumik D (1998)	9693370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516732	2542123	2539864	278599	276411	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC16A3.15c	mal3	nda2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Beinhauer JD (1997)	9348288	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516733	2542123	2540582	278599	277108	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC26H8.07c	mal3	nda3	-	alp12|ben1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Beinhauer JD (1997)	9348288	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516734	2543593	2539898	280008	276444	SPAC4G9.10	SPBC12D12.07c	arg3	trx2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Song JY (2008)	18849471	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516735	2542071	2540554	278548	277081	SPAC26H5.03	SPBC29A10.03c	pcf2	pcf1	cac2	SPBC365.19c|rlf2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dohke K (2008)	18761674	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516736	2539132	2539811	275704	276361	SPCC1442.15c	SPBP4H10.03	cox18	oxa102	-	oxa1|oxa1-2|oxa1sp2|SPBC1346.02c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gaisne M (2006)	16911509	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516737	2539195	2538709	275766	275293	SPCC18B5.01c	SPCC663.03	bfr1	pmd1	SPCPJ732.04c|hba2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Arita Y (2011)	21340088	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516738	2540580	2540258	277106	276789	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC32C12.02	ran1	ste11	pat1	aff1|stex	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Li P (1996)	8945514	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516739	2540458	2542150	276986	278626	SPBC29A10.14	SPAC17A5.11	rec8	rec12	-	spo11	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kitajima TS (2003)	14532136	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516740	2540880	2539869	277397	276415	SPBC582.03	SPBC11B10.09	cdc13	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Booher R (1987)	3428262	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516741	2540880	2539869	277397	276415	SPBC582.03	SPBC11B10.09	cdc13	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Booher R (1987)	3428262	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516742	2542061	3361572	278539	280648	SPAC23C11.10	SPSNRNA.06	mpn1	snu6	SPAC23C11.10|usb1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Shchepachev V (2012)	23022480	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516743	2542061	3361572	278539	280648	SPAC23C11.10	SPSNRNA.06	mpn1	snu6	SPAC23C11.10|usb1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Shchepachev V (2012)	23022480	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516744	3361562	2539620	280638	276178	SPAC11E3.03	SPBC1861.01c	csm1	cnp3	pcs1	SPBC56F2.13	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Corbett KD (2010)	20723757	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516745	3361562	2541047	280638	277562	SPAC11E3.03	SPBC409.09c	csm1	mis13	pcs1	cnl1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Corbett KD (2010)	20723757	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516746	2540580	2541652	277106	278148	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC24B11.06c	ran1	sty1	pat1	phh1|spc1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Wilkinson MG (1996)	8824588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516747	2540580	2541055	277106	277570	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC409.07c	ran1	wis1	pat1	smf2|spc2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Wilkinson MG (1996)	8824588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516748	2542632	2541652	279086	278148	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC24B11.06c	cdc25	sty1	sal2	phh1|spc1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Wilkinson MG (1996)	8824588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516749	2542632	2541055	279086	277570	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC409.07c	cdc25	wis1	sal2	smf2|spc2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Wilkinson MG (1996)	8824588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516750	2541652	2540329	278148	276859	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC29B5.01	sty1	atf1	phh1|spc1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Two-hybrid	physical	Wilkinson MG (1996)	8824588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516751	2540329	2541652	276859	278148	SPBC29B5.01	SPAC24B11.06c	atf1	sty1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	phh1|spc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wilkinson MG (1996)	8824588	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516752	2540072	2541519	276610	278020	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC227.07c	ppa2	pab1	-	ret1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kinoshita K (1996)	9078365	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516753	2541519	2540072	278020	276610	SPAC227.07c	SPBC16H5.07c	pab1	ppa2	ret1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kinoshita K (1996)	9078365	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516754	2539447	2540458	276010	276986	SPCC338.17c	SPBC29A10.14	rad21	rec8	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Watanabe Y (1999)	10440376	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516755	2542036	2541120	278518	277635	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC649.03	hrq1	rhp14	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Co-purification	physical	Groocock LM (2012)	22064477	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516756	2542036	2539087	278518	275659	SPAC23A1.19c	SPCC1259.13	hrq1	chk1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Groocock LM (2012)	22064477	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516757	2542036	2541620	278518	278117	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC2G11.12	hrq1	rqh1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	hus2|rad12|rec9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Groocock LM (2012)	22064477	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516758	2542036	2539723	278518	276276	SPAC23A1.19c	SPBC1347.01c	hrq1	rev1	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	SPBC215.16c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Groocock LM (2012)	22064477	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516759	2542036	2543358	278518	279780	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC688.10	hrq1	rev3	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Groocock LM (2012)	22064477	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516760	2542036	2542925	278518	279366	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC11E3.04c	hrq1	ubc13	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	spu13|sst5	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Groocock LM (2012)	22064477	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516761	2543666	2542200	280080	278675	SPAC644.06c	SPAC19D5.01	cdr1	pyp2	nim1	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Hannig G (1994)	7937842	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516762	2539736	2541799	276288	278290	SPBC12C2.12c	SPAC5H10.02c	glo1	hsp3102	SPBC21D10.03c	SPAC5H10.02c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Zhao Q (2014)	24758716	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516763	2539736	2539466	276288	276029	SPBC12C2.12c	SPCC757.03c	glo1	hsp3101	SPBC21D10.03c	SPCC757.03c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Zhao Q (2014)	24758716	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516764	2539149	2542029	275721	278511	SPCC1739.11c	SPAC8E11.02c	cdc11	rad24	-	anr5|sam4	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Feoktistova A (2012)	22419817	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516765	2543153	2542090	279585	278567	SPAC821.05	SPAC25G10.08	SPAC821.05	SPAC25G10.08	-	p116	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ray A (2008)	19061185	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516766	2543537	2542090	279954	278567	SPAC4D7.05	SPAC25G10.08	sum1	SPAC25G10.08	tif34	p116	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ray A (2008)	19061185	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516767	2543537	2543153	279954	279585	SPAC4D7.05	SPAC821.05	sum1	SPAC821.05	tif34	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ray A (2008)	19061185	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516768	2543537	2541089	279954	277604	SPAC4D7.05	SPBC646.09c	sum1	int6	tif34	yin6	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ray A (2008)	19061185	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516769	2541089	2542090	277604	278567	SPBC646.09c	SPAC25G10.08	int6	SPAC25G10.08	yin6	p116	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ray A (2008)	19061185	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516770	2541089	2543537	277604	279954	SPBC646.09c	SPAC4D7.05	int6	sum1	yin6	tif34	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ray A (2008)	19061185	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516771	2541089	2543153	277604	279585	SPBC646.09c	SPAC821.05	int6	SPAC821.05	yin6	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ray A (2008)	19061185	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516772	2541089	2540868	277604	277385	SPBC646.09c	SPBC4C3.07	int6	SPBC4C3.07	yin6	csn6	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ray A (2008)	19061185	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516773	2543537	2540868	279954	277385	SPAC4D7.05	SPBC4C3.07	sum1	SPBC4C3.07	tif34	csn6	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ray A (2008)	19061185	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516774	2541881	2542128	278371	278604	SPAC22F3.10c	SPAC821.10c	gcs1	sod1	apd1|gsh1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mutoh N (2007)	17986764	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516775	2541606	2542271	278103	278740	SPAC11H11.04	SPAC3F10.10c	mam2	map3	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kitamura K (1996)	8807800	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516776	2542140	2541544	278616	278044	SPAC1783.07c	SPAC22G7.06c	pap1	ura1	caf3	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Benko Z (1997)	9211790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516777	2542140	2539985	278616	276529	SPAC1783.07c	SPBC14F5.09c	pap1	ade8	caf3	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Benko Z (1997)	9211790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516778	2542140	2539973	278616	276517	SPAC1783.07c	SPBC1539.09c	pap1	trp1	caf3	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Benko Z (1997)	9211790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516779	2542140	2539973	278616	276517	SPAC1783.07c	SPBC1539.09c	pap1	trp1	caf3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Benko Z (1997)	9211790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516780	2542140	2540729	278616	277252	SPAC1783.07c	SPBC215.08c	pap1	arg4	caf3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Benko Z (1997)	9211790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516781	2542140	2541224	278616	277738	SPAC1783.07c	SPBC418.01c	pap1	his4	caf3	SPBC887.20c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Benko Z (1997)	9211790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516782	2542140	2538768	278616	275351	SPAC1783.07c	SPCC330.05c	pap1	ura4	caf3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Benko Z (1997)	9211790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516783	2542140	2539569	278616	276129	SPAC1783.07c	SPCPB16A4.03c	pap1	ade10	caf3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Benko Z (1997)	9211790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516784	3361487	2542140	280563	278616	SPAC1805.17	SPAC1783.07c	crm1	pap1	SPAC1B2.01|caf2	caf3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Benko Z (1997)	9211790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516785	3361487	2540948	280563	277464	SPAC1805.17	SPBC365.13c	crm1	hba1	SPAC1B2.01|caf2	caf1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Benko Z (1997)	9211790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516786	2539640	2539869	276195	276415	SPBC32F12.09	SPBC11B10.09	rum1	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Jallepalli PV (1996)	8598285	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516787	2539640	2540880	276195	277397	SPBC32F12.09	SPBC582.03	rum1	cdc13	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Jallepalli PV (1996)	8598285	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516788	2539642	2541193	276197	277707	SPBC1706.01	SPBC776.02c	tea4	dis2	wsh3	bws1|sds1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kokkoris K (2014)	24554432	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516789	2539642	2539179	276197	275750	SPBC1706.01	SPCC31H12.05c	tea4	sds21	wsh3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kokkoris K (2014)	24554432	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516790	2539642	2542619	276197	279073	SPBC1706.01	SPAC6G10.02c	tea4	tea3	wsh3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kokkoris K (2014)	24554432	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516791	2539642	2539047	276197	275620	SPBC1706.01	SPCC1223.06	tea4	tea1	wsh3	alp8	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kokkoris K (2014)	24554432	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516792	2540580	2542080	277106	278557	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC27D7.03c	ran1	mei2	pat1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Watanabe Y (1997)	9062192	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516793	2541185	2541466	277699	277968	SPBC6B1.07	SPAC14C4.06c	prp1	nab2	zer1	SPAC14C4.06c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516794	2539645	2541466	276200	277968	SPBC146.07	SPAC14C4.06c	prp2	nab2	mis11|ods1|uaf1	SPAC14C4.06c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516795	2541466	2542663	277968	279116	SPAC14C4.06c	SPAC607.03c	nab2	snu13	SPAC14C4.06c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516796	2541466	2539733	277968	276285	SPAC14C4.06c	SPBC16E9.12c	nab2	pab2	SPAC14C4.06c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	St-Sauveur VG (2013)	24081329	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516797	2542988	2542873	279426	279318	SPAC1006.09	SPAC9G1.02	win1	wis4	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	wak1|wik1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Morigasaki S (2013)	24255738	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516798	2542988	2541055	279426	277570	SPAC1006.09	SPBC409.07c	win1	wis1	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	smf2|spc2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Morigasaki S (2013)	24255738	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516799	2540547	2541209	277074	277723	SPBC32F12.11	SPBC887.10	tdh1	mcs4	gpd1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Morigasaki S (2013)	24255738	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516800	2540936	2539864	277452	276411	SPBC800.05c	SPBC16A3.15c	atb2	nda2	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Adachi Y (1986)	3785193	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516801	2539864	2540936	276411	277452	SPBC16A3.15c	SPBC800.05c	nda2	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Adachi Y (1986)	3785193	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516802	2543517	2541975	279935	278460	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC20G8.05c	spa2	cdc15	SPAC3G9.05	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2015)	25428987	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516803	2543517	2541975	279935	278460	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC20G8.05c	spa2	cdc15	SPAC3G9.05	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Ren L (2015)	25428987	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516804	2539437	2541975	276000	278460	SPCC645.06c	SPAC20G8.05c	rgf3	cdc15	lad1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Ren L (2015)	25428987	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516805	2542328	2543517	278794	279935	SPAC16E8.08	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC16E8.08	spa2	pos1	SPAC3G9.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2015)	25428987	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516806	2543517	2542328	279935	278794	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC16E8.08	spa2	SPAC16E8.08	SPAC3G9.05	pos1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2015)	25428987	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516807	2539437	2541975	276000	278460	SPCC645.06c	SPAC20G8.05c	rgf3	cdc15	lad1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2015)	25428987	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516808	2539437	2540742	276000	277265	SPCC645.06c	SPBC19G7.08c	rgf3	art1	lad1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2015)	25428987	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516809	2539437	2542328	276000	278794	SPCC645.06c	SPAC16E8.08	rgf3	SPAC16E8.08	lad1	pos1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ren L (2015)	25428987	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516810	2539437	2540112	276000	276649	SPCC645.06c	SPBC11C11.02	rgf3	imp2	lad1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ren L (2015)	25428987	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516811	2540742	2541975	277265	278460	SPBC19G7.08c	SPAC20G8.05c	art1	cdc15	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ren L (2015)	25428987	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516812	2540742	2540112	277265	276649	SPBC19G7.08c	SPBC11C11.02	art1	imp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ren L (2015)	25428987	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516813	2540742	2541203	277265	277717	SPBC19G7.08c	SPBC83.18c	art1	fic1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ren L (2015)	25428987	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516814	2540742	2540856	277265	277373	SPBC19G7.08c	SPBC4F6.12	art1	pxl1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ren L (2015)	25428987	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516815	2540856	2541975	277373	278460	SPBC4F6.12	SPAC20G8.05c	pxl1	cdc15	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ren L (2015)	25428987	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516816	2540856	2540112	277373	276649	SPBC4F6.12	SPBC11C11.02	pxl1	imp2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ren L (2015)	25428987	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516817	2541203	2540856	277717	277373	SPBC83.18c	SPBC4F6.12	fic1	pxl1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ren L (2015)	25428987	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516818	2542740	2540112	279190	276649	SPAC9G1.06c	SPBC11C11.02	cyk3	imp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ren L (2015)	25428987	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516819	2542740	2540856	279190	277373	SPAC9G1.06c	SPBC4F6.12	cyk3	pxl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Ren L (2015)	25428987	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516820	2542740	2541975	279190	278460	SPAC9G1.06c	SPAC20G8.05c	cyk3	cdc15	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ren L (2015)	25428987	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516821	2541203	2543517	277717	279935	SPBC83.18c	SPAC3G9.05	fic1	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ren L (2015)	25428987	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516822	2541203	2541975	277717	278460	SPBC83.18c	SPAC20G8.05c	fic1	cdc15	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ren L (2015)	25428987	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516823	2543517	2542328	279935	278794	SPAC3G9.05	SPAC16E8.08	spa2	SPAC16E8.08	SPAC3G9.05	pos1	Co-purification	physical	Ren L (2015)	25428987	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516824	2539437	2540742	276000	277265	SPCC645.06c	SPBC19G7.08c	rgf3	art1	lad1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ren L (2015)	25428987	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516825	2542740	2543517	279190	279935	SPAC9G1.06c	SPAC3G9.05	cyk3	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ren L (2015)	25428987	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516826	2541203	2543517	277717	279935	SPBC83.18c	SPAC3G9.05	fic1	spa2	-	SPAC3G9.05	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ren L (2015)	25428987	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516827	2543524	2541856	279942	278347	SPAC4D7.07c	SPAC23H3.08c	csi2	bub3	SPAC4D7.07c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Costa J (2014)	25253718	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516828	2543524	2540060	279942	276598	SPAC4D7.07c	SPBC106.01	csi2	mph1	SPAC4D7.07c	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Costa J (2014)	25253718	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516829	2543524	2540589	279942	277115	SPAC4D7.07c	SPBC20F10.06	csi2	mad2	SPAC4D7.07c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Costa J (2014)	25253718	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516830	2540072	2539379	276610	275945	SPBC16H5.07c	SPCC188.02	ppa2	par1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tanabe O (2001)	11380623	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516831	2542891	2539379	279335	275945	SPAC6F12.12	SPCC188.02	par2	par1	pbp2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tanabe O (2001)	11380623	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516832	2539379	2542891	275945	279335	SPCC188.02	SPAC6F12.12	par1	par2	-	pbp2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Tanabe O (2001)	11380623	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516833	2540024	2539379	276568	275945	SPBP4H10.04	SPCC188.02	ppb1	par1	SPBC1346.01c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tanabe O (2001)	11380623	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516834	2540580	2542094	277106	278571	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC29B12.06c	ran1	rcd1	pat1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Okazaki N (1998)	9447985	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516835	2540580	2542094	277106	278571	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC29B12.06c	ran1	rcd1	pat1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Okazaki N (1998)	9447985	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516836	2542094	2540258	278571	276789	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC32C12.02	rcd1	ste11	-	aff1|stex	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Okazaki N (1998)	9447985	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516837	2539781	2542094	276331	278571	SPBC106.10	SPAC29B12.06c	pka1	rcd1	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Okazaki N (1998)	9447985	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516838	2542094	2539781	278571	276331	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC106.10	rcd1	pka1	-	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Okazaki N (1998)	9447985	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516839	2541055	2542094	277570	278571	SPBC409.07c	SPAC29B12.06c	wis1	rcd1	smf2|spc2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Okazaki N (1998)	9447985	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516840	2542094	2541055	278571	277570	SPAC29B12.06c	SPBC409.07c	rcd1	wis1	-	smf2|spc2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Okazaki N (1998)	9447985	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516841	2542103	2542094	278579	278571	SPAC31G5.11	SPAC29B12.06c	pac2	rcd1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Okazaki N (1998)	9447985	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516842	2542094	2542103	278571	278579	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAC31G5.11	rcd1	pac2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Okazaki N (1998)	9447985	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516843	2542094	2543481	278571	279901	SPAC29B12.06c	SPAPB2B4.03	rcd1	cig2	-	cyc17	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Okazaki N (1998)	9447985	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516844	2540541	2541319	277068	277831	SPBC1A4.03c	SPBP4H10.06c	top2	cut14	ptr11	smc2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Petrova B (2012)	23263988	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516845	2542239	2542467	278711	278928	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC1834.04	chp1	hht1	-	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Xhemalce B (2010)	20299449	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516846	2542239	2539804	278711	276354	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC1105.11c	chp1	hht3	-	h3.3	Protein-peptide	physical	Xhemalce B (2010)	20299449	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516847	2542239	2541220	278711	277734	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC8D2.04	chp1	hht2	-	h3.2	Protein-peptide	physical	Xhemalce B (2010)	20299449	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516848	2541633	2542467	278129	278928	SPAC664.01c	SPAC1834.04	swi6	hht1	SPAC824.10c	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Xhemalce B (2010)	20299449	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516849	2541633	2539804	278129	276354	SPAC664.01c	SPBC1105.11c	swi6	hht3	SPAC824.10c	h3.3	Protein-peptide	physical	Xhemalce B (2010)	20299449	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516850	2541633	2541220	278129	277734	SPAC664.01c	SPBC8D2.04	swi6	hht2	SPAC824.10c	h3.2	Protein-peptide	physical	Xhemalce B (2010)	20299449	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516851	2540047	2542467	276585	278928	SPBC16C6.10	SPAC1834.04	chp2	hht1	-	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Xhemalce B (2010)	20299449	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516852	2540047	2539804	276585	276354	SPBC16C6.10	SPBC1105.11c	chp2	hht3	-	h3.3	Protein-peptide	physical	Xhemalce B (2010)	20299449	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516853	2540047	2541220	276585	277734	SPBC16C6.10	SPBC8D2.04	chp2	hht2	-	h3.2	Protein-peptide	physical	Xhemalce B (2010)	20299449	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516854	2539007	2540737	275580	277260	SPCC1281.01	SPBC19G7.05c	ags1	bgs1	SPCC17A7.01|SPCC338.01c|mok1	cps1|drc1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Cortes JC (2012)	22891259	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516855	2539007	2540660	275580	277185	SPCC1281.01	SPBC21.06c	ags1	cdc7	SPCC17A7.01|SPCC338.01c|mok1	its10|pld1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Cortes JC (2012)	22891259	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516856	2539007	2541599	275580	278096	SPCC1281.01	SPAC24B11.11c	ags1	sid2	SPCC17A7.01|SPCC338.01c|mok1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Cortes JC (2012)	22891259	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516857	2542482	2539645	278942	276200	SPAP8A3.06	SPBC146.07	uaf2	prp2	SPAP8A3.06|ods2	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Two-hybrid	physical	Gozani O (1998)	9671485	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516858	2539645	2541619	276200	278116	SPBC146.07	SPAC27F1.09c	prp2	prp10	mis11|ods1|uaf1	sap155|SF3b155	Two-hybrid	physical	Gozani O (1998)	9671485	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516859	2539645	2542482	276200	278942	SPBC146.07	SPAP8A3.06	prp2	uaf2	mis11|ods1|uaf1	SPAP8A3.06|ods2	Two-hybrid	physical	Gozani O (1998)	9671485	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516860	2541059	2540142	277574	276679	SPBC557.03c	SPBC1773.07c	pim1	sbp1	dcd1|ptr2	yrb1	Dosage Lethality	genetic	He X (1998)	9504913	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516861	2540471	2540555	276999	277082	SPBC19F8.07	SPBP16F5.02	mcs6	mcs2	cdk7|crk1|mop1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Damagnez V (1995)	8557036	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516862	2542886	2542886	279331	279331	SPAC1486.01	SPAC1486.01	SPAC1486.01	SPAC1486.01	sod2	sod2	Co-purification	physical	Jeong JH (2001)	11350071	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516863	2538832	2539645	275413	276200	SPCC962.06c	SPBC146.07	bpb1	prp2	sf1|ods3	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Banerjee H (2004)	14730023	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516864	2543629	2543387	280043	279809	SPAC3H5.06c	SPAPB1E7.02c	pol1	mcl1	polA|swi7	slr3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tsutsui Y (2005)	15915339	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516865	2543629	2543387	280043	279809	SPAC3H5.06c	SPAPB1E7.02c	pol1	mcl1	polA|swi7	slr3	Two-hybrid	physical	Tsutsui Y (2005)	15915339	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516866	2543387	2543629	279809	280043	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC3H5.06c	mcl1	pol1	slr3	polA|swi7	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Tsutsui Y (2005)	15915339	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516867	2543387	2543629	279809	280043	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC3H5.06c	mcl1	pol1	slr3	polA|swi7	Two-hybrid	physical	Tsutsui Y (2005)	15915339	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516868	2540025	2540728	276569	277251	SPBC16G5.01	SPBC216.06c	rpn12	swi1	SPBC342.07|mts3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Roseaulin LC (2013)	23349636	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516869	2540728	2539527	277251	276089	SPBC216.06c	SPCC338.16	swi1	pof3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Roseaulin LC (2013)	23349636	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516870	3361561	2540667	280637	277192	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC211.06	swr1	gfh1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Anders A (2008)	19160458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516871	2539668	2540667	276223	277192	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC211.06	pht1	gfh1	pi001	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Anders A (2008)	19160458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516872	2541606	2540414	278103	276942	SPAC11H11.04	SPBC24C6.06	mam2	gpa1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Chung KS (2001)	11461899	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516873	2538847	2542946	275428	279386	SPCC594.06c	SPAC6F12.03c	SPCC594.06c	fsv1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Hosomi A (2014)	25378562	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516874	2543394	2543646	279816	280060	SPAPB1A10.11c	SPAC821.07c	mse1	moc3	ers2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19502729	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516875	2542408	2543646	278872	280060	SPAC17A5.15c	SPAC821.07c	gus1	moc3	SPAC17A5.15c|ers1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19502729	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516876	2542861	2542029	279307	278511	SPAC13G7.13c	SPAC8E11.02c	msa1	rad24	SPAC6C3.01c	anr5|sam4	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Jeong HT (2004)	15166138	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516877	2540728	3361456	277251	280532	SPBC216.06c	SPAC1142.03c	swi1	swi2	-	SPAC17G6.20c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Egel R (1984)	6587363	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516878	2540728	2541633	277251	278129	SPBC216.06c	SPAC664.01c	swi1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Egel R (1984)	6587363	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516879	2540728	2540574	277251	277101	SPBC216.06c	SPBC409.03	swi1	swi5	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Egel R (1984)	6587363	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516880	3361323	2540574	280399	277101	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC409.03	swi3	swi5	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Egel R (1984)	6587363	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516881	2541633	2543629	278129	280043	SPAC664.01c	SPAC3H5.06c	swi6	pol1	SPAC824.10c	polA|swi7	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Egel R (1984)	6587363	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516882	2539155	2540249	275727	276781	SPCC1020.02	SPBC32F12.08c	spc7	duo1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kerres A (2007)	17442892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516883	2539155	2539505	275727	276068	SPCC1020.02	SPCC736.14	spc7	dis1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Kerres A (2007)	17442892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516884	2540694	2540115	277218	276652	SPBC19C7.10	SPBC1778.02	bqt4	rap1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Fujita I (2012)	22959349	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516885	2541158	2540148	277673	276685	SPBC660.13c	SPBC16D10.04c	ssb1	dna2	rad11|rpa1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Audry J (2015)	26041456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516886	2541158	2541213	277673	277727	SPBC660.13c	SPBC887.14c	ssb1	pfh1	rad11|rpa1	pif1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Audry J (2015)	26041456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516887	2541158	2541620	277673	278117	SPBC660.13c	SPAC2G11.12	ssb1	rqh1	rad11|rpa1	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Audry J (2015)	26041456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516888	2541158	2543580	277673	279995	SPBC660.13c	SPAC644.14c	ssb1	rad51	rad11|rpa1	rhp51	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Audry J (2015)	26041456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516889	2541158	2543086	277673	279519	SPBC660.13c	SPAC30D11.10	ssb1	rad52	rad11|rpa1	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Audry J (2015)	26041456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516890	2541158	2541213	277673	277727	SPBC660.13c	SPBC887.14c	ssb1	pfh1	rad11|rpa1	pif1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Audry J (2015)	26041456	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516891	2540810	2543646	277329	280060	SPBC19C7.03	SPAC821.07c	cyr1	moc3	git2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Goldar MM (2005)	16273369	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516892	2540810	2539958	277329	276502	SPBC19C7.03	SPBC1718.07c	cyr1	zfs1	git2	moc4	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Goldar MM (2005)	16273369	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516893	2540810	2538689	277329	275274	SPBC19C7.03	SPCC1795.11	cyr1	sum3	git2	ded1|moc2|slh3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Goldar MM (2005)	16273369	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516894	2543646	2539958	280060	276502	SPAC821.07c	SPBC1718.07c	moc3	zfs1	-	moc4	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Goldar MM (2005)	16273369	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516895	2539958	2543646	276502	280060	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC821.07c	zfs1	moc3	moc4	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Goldar MM (2005)	16273369	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516896	2542409	2542409	278873	278873	SPAC17G8.10c	SPAC17G8.10c	dma1	dma1	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Johnson AE (2012)	22669973	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516897	2543583	3361572	279998	280648	SPAC644.12	SPSNRNA.06	cdc5	snu6	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	McDonald WH (1999)	10409726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516898	2543372	2540582	279794	277108	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC26H8.07c	ase1	nda3	-	alp12|ben1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yamashita A (2005)	15647375	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516899	2543446	2540051	279866	276589	SPAC4F8.10c	SPBC32H8.12c	stg1	act1	-	cps8|pi012	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nakano K (2005)	16256112	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516900	2542080	5802740	278557	857878	SPAC27D7.03c	SPNCRNA.103	mei2	sme2	-	SPNCRNA.1341	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Watanabe Y (1994)	7520368	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516901	2540853	2542380	277370	278844	SPBC428.16c	SPAC17G6.04c	rhb1	cpp1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Murai T (2009)	19620394	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516902	2543339	2540853	279762	277370	SPAC630.13c	SPBC428.16c	tsc2	rhb1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Murai T (2009)	19620394	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516903	2540720	2540853	277243	277370	SPBC216.07c	SPBC428.16c	tor2	rhb1	SPBC646.01c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Murai T (2009)	19620394	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516904	2543298	2543460	279723	279880	SPAC6B12.15	SPAC3H5.10	cpc2	rpl3202	rkp1	rpl32|rpl32-2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516905	2543298	2541117	279723	277632	SPAC6B12.15	SPBC646.13	cpc2	sds23	rkp1	moc1|psp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516906	2543298	2538689	279723	275274	SPAC6B12.15	SPCC1795.11	cpc2	sum3	rkp1	ded1|moc2|slh3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516907	2543460	2543298	279880	279723	SPAC3H5.10	SPAC6B12.15	rpl3202	cpc2	rpl32|rpl32-2	rkp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516908	2541117	2543298	277632	279723	SPBC646.13	SPAC6B12.15	sds23	cpc2	moc1|psp1	rkp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516909	2538689	2543298	275274	279723	SPCC1795.11	SPAC6B12.15	sum3	cpc2	ded1|moc2|slh3	rkp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Paul SK (2009)	19682301	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516910	2542082	2542896	278559	279340	SPAC29B12.10c	SPAC3F10.04	pgt1	gsa1	opt1	gsh2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Dworeck T (2009)	19180638	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516911	2542466	2542378	278927	278842	SPAC19E9.01c	SPAC1805.04	nup40	nup132	-	Nup133b	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Chen XQ (2004)	15116432	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516912	2540939	2543537	277455	279954	SPBC4.07c	SPAC4D7.05	rpt2	sum1	mts2	tif34	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Dunand-Sauthier I (2002)	12006658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516913	2541209	2541178	277723	277692	SPBC887.10	SPBC725.02	mcs4	mpr1	-	spy1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Morigasaki S (2008)	18406331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516914	2542873	2540547	279318	277074	SPAC9G1.02	SPBC32F12.11	wis4	tdh1	wak1|wik1	gpd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Morigasaki S (2008)	18406331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516915	2542873	2541209	279318	277723	SPAC9G1.02	SPBC887.10	wis4	mcs4	wak1|wik1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Morigasaki S (2008)	18406331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516916	2540547	2542988	277074	279426	SPBC32F12.11	SPAC1006.09	tdh1	win1	gpd1	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Morigasaki S (2008)	18406331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516917	2542873	2541209	279318	277723	SPAC9G1.02	SPBC887.10	wis4	mcs4	wak1|wik1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Morigasaki S (2008)	18406331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516918	2540547	2541209	277074	277723	SPBC32F12.11	SPBC887.10	tdh1	mcs4	gpd1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Morigasaki S (2008)	18406331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516919	2540547	2540975	277074	277491	SPBC32F12.11	SPBC354.12	tdh1	gpd3	gpd1	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Morigasaki S (2008)	18406331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516920	2540580	2540329	277106	276859	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC29B5.01	ran1	atf1	pat1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Takeda T (1995)	8557039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516921	2540810	2540329	277329	276859	SPBC19C7.03	SPBC29B5.01	cyr1	atf1	git2	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Takeda T (1995)	8557039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516922	2540329	2539207	276859	275777	SPBC29B5.01	SPCC285.09c	atf1	cgs2	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	pde1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Takeda T (1995)	8557039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516923	2540329	2543351	276859	279773	SPBC29B5.01	SPAC8C9.03	atf1	cgs1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Takeda T (1995)	8557039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516924	2540329	2539123	276859	275695	SPBC29B5.01	SPCC18B5.03	atf1	wee1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kanoh J (1996)	9135083	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516925	2539539	2539804	276101	276354	SPCC576.10c	SPBC1105.11c	rpt3	hht3	-	h3.3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kitagawa T (2014)	24710126	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516926	2539539	2541220	276101	277734	SPCC576.10c	SPBC8D2.04	rpt3	hht2	-	h3.2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kitagawa T (2014)	24710126	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516927	2540810	2538689	277329	275274	SPBC19C7.03	SPCC1795.11	cyr1	sum3	git2	ded1|moc2|slh3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kawamukai M (1999)	10395922	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516928	2542558	2540368	279014	276897	SPAC1952.07	SPBC36.05c	rad1	clr6	rad19	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Alao JP (2009)	19723888	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516929	2541028	2542140	277543	278616	SPBC577.08c	SPAC1783.07c	txl1	pap1	trx3	caf3	Co-purification	physical	Brown JD (2013)	24268782	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516930	2539572	3361358	276132	280434	SPCC576.03c	SPBC3F6.03	tpx1	trr1	-	caf4	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Brown JD (2013)	24268782	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516931	2540414	2541677	276942	278173	SPBC24C6.06	SPAC1565.04c	gpa1	ste4	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Barr MM (1996)	8816472	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516932	2539671	2539225	276226	275795	SPBC1734.11	SPCC1739.13	mas5	ssa2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Luminescence	physical	Vjestica A (2013)	24146635	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516933	2541685	2539907	278181	276453	SPAC1039.05c	SPBC1198.04c	klf1	zas1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shimanuki M (2013)	24167631	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516934	2543316	2543079	279740	279512	SPAPJ691.02	SPAC343.04c	SPAPJ691.02	SPAC343.04c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Shimanuki M (2013)	24167631	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516935	2541125	2541125	277640	277640	SPBC409.13	SPBC409.13	rib4	rib4	SPBC409.13	SPBC409.13	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Gerhardt S (2002)	12083520	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516936	2543082	2539741	279515	276293	SPAC3C7.08c	SPBC16A3.05c	elf1	rae1	-	cut21	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Moon D (2008)	18758733	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516937	2539741	2540727	276293	277250	SPBC16A3.05c	SPBC1921.03c	rae1	mex67	cut21	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Moon D (2008)	18758733	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516938	2539741	2540395	276293	276923	SPBC16A3.05c	SPBC31E1.05	rae1	gle1	cut21	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Moon D (2008)	18758733	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516939	2540612	2542137	277138	278613	SPBC1D7.05	SPAC1D4.13	byr2	byr1	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	ste1|ste3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kjaerulff S (2005)	15713656	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516940	2540612	2542080	277138	278557	SPBC1D7.05	SPAC27D7.03c	byr2	mei2	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kjaerulff S (2005)	15713656	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516941	2540612	2542474	277138	278934	SPBC1D7.05	SPAC31G5.09c	byr2	spk1	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kjaerulff S (2005)	15713656	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516942	2540612	2540258	277138	276789	SPBC1D7.05	SPBC32C12.02	byr2	ste11	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	aff1|stex	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kjaerulff S (2005)	15713656	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516943	2539155	2540564	275727	277091	SPCC1020.02	SPBC530.03c	spc7	bag102	-	bag1-b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516944	2539155	2540564	275727	277091	SPCC1020.02	SPBC530.03c	spc7	bag102	-	bag1-b	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516945	2539155	2542919	275727	279360	SPCC1020.02	SPAC6C3.08	spc7	nas6	-	SPAC6C3.08	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516946	2539155	2542809	275727	279257	SPCC1020.02	SPAC15A10.11	spc7	ubr11	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516947	2539155	2540480	275727	277008	SPCC1020.02	SPBC2A9.04c	spc7	san1	-	SPBC2A9.04c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516948	2539155	2541378	275727	277889	SPCC1020.02	SPBP8B7.21	spc7	ubp3	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516949	2539050	2539843	275623	276391	SPCC11E10.08	SPBC16G5.11c	rik1	bag101	-	bag1|bag1-a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516950	2543360	2539843	279782	276391	SPAC664.10	SPBC16G5.11c	klp2	bag101	-	bag1|bag1-a	Positive Genetic	genetic	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516951	2538946	2540564	275520	277091	SPCC162.11c	SPBC530.03c	SPCC162.11c	bag102	-	bag1-b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516952	2541561	2540564	278060	277091	SPAC24B11.07c	SPBC530.03c	SPAC24B11.07c	bag102	-	bag1-b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516953	2542097	2540564	278573	277091	SPACUNK4.06c	SPBC530.03c	rpb7	bag102	SPAPYUK71.02	bag1-b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516954	2539130	2540564	275702	277091	SPCC1919.03c	SPBC530.03c	amk2	bag102	-	bag1-b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516955	2541346	2540564	277857	277091	SPBP8B7.08c	SPBC530.03c	ppm1	bag102	SPBP8B7.08c	bag1-b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516956	2542374	2540564	278838	277091	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC530.03c	cdt2	bag102	sev1	bag1-b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Kriegenburg F (2014)	24497846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516957	2542665	2542665	279118	279118	SPAC10F6.08c	SPAC10F6.08c	nht10	nht10	nht1	nht1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tang MY (2015)	25701403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516958	2542665	2542278	279118	278747	SPAC10F6.08c	SPAC17G8.07	nht10	yaf9	nht1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tang MY (2015)	25701403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516959	2542665	2542418	279118	278881	SPAC10F6.08c	SPAC1805.07c	nht10	dad2	nht1	hos2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tang MY (2015)	25701403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516960	2542665	2541422	279118	277928	SPAC10F6.08c	SPAC2F7.07c	nht10	cph2	nht1	rco1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tang MY (2015)	25701403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516961	2542665	2543402	279118	279824	SPAC10F6.08c	SPAC630.14c	nht10	tup12	nht1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tang MY (2015)	25701403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516962	2542665	2539737	279118	276289	SPAC10F6.08c	SPBC16A3.07c	nht10	nrm1	nht1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tang MY (2015)	25701403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516963	2542665	2540309	279118	276839	SPAC10F6.08c	SPBC21B10.13c	nht10	yox1	nht1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tang MY (2015)	25701403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516964	2539226	2542278	275796	278747	SPCC16C4.20c	SPAC17G8.07	SPCC16C4.20c	yaf9	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tang MY (2015)	25701403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516965	2539226	2542418	275796	278881	SPCC16C4.20c	SPAC1805.07c	SPCC16C4.20c	dad2	-	hos2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tang MY (2015)	25701403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516966	2539226	2541422	275796	277928	SPCC16C4.20c	SPAC2F7.07c	SPCC16C4.20c	cph2	-	rco1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tang MY (2015)	25701403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516967	2539226	2543402	275796	279824	SPCC16C4.20c	SPAC630.14c	SPCC16C4.20c	tup12	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tang MY (2015)	25701403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516968	2539226	2539737	275796	276289	SPCC16C4.20c	SPBC16A3.07c	SPCC16C4.20c	nrm1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tang MY (2015)	25701403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516969	2539226	2540309	275796	276839	SPCC16C4.20c	SPBC21B10.13c	SPCC16C4.20c	yox1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tang MY (2015)	25701403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516970	2539226	2539226	275796	275796	SPCC16C4.20c	SPCC16C4.20c	SPCC16C4.20c	SPCC16C4.20c	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Tang MY (2015)	25701403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516971	2539847	3361532	276395	280608	SPBC530.14c	SPAC1D4.11c	dsk1	lkh1	-	kic1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tang Z (2007)	17362205	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516972	2539997	2543441	276541	279861	SPBC1604.14c	SPAC821.12	shk1	orb6	orb2|pak1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Verde F (1995)	8522609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516973	2539180	2542293	275751	278761	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC17G8.14c	sts5	pck1	orb4	SPAC22H10.01c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Verde F (1995)	8522609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516974	2539180	2542677	275751	279130	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC26F1.10c	sts5	pyp1	orb4	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Verde F (1995)	8522609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516975	2541741	2539487	278235	276050	SPAC20G4.02c	SPCC895.05	fus1	for3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Dudin O (2015)	25825517	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516976	2541741	3361560	278235	280636	SPAC20G4.02c	SPAC14C4.09	fus1	agn1	-	SPAC14C4.09	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Dudin O (2015)	25825517	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516977	2541741	2541122	278235	277637	SPAC20G4.02c	SPBC646.06c	fus1	agn2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Dudin O (2015)	25825517	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516978	2541741	2541480	278235	277982	SPAC20G4.02c	SPAC23D3.10c	fus1	eng2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Dudin O (2015)	25825517	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516979	2541741	2539993	278235	276537	SPAC20G4.02c	SPBC1105.05	fus1	exg1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Dudin O (2015)	25825517	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516980	2541741	2542987	278235	279425	SPAC20G4.02c	SPAC12B10.11	fus1	exg2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Dudin O (2015)	25825517	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516981	2541741	2540296	278235	276827	SPAC20G4.02c	SPBC2D10.05	fus1	exg3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Dudin O (2015)	25825517	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516982	2540830	2541183	277348	277697	SPBC18H10.16	SPBC725.14	can1	arg6	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Fantes PA (1984)	18357653	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516983	2540830	2538726	277348	275310	SPBC18H10.16	SPCC777.09c	can1	arg1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Fantes PA (1984)	18357653	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516984	2538832	2542482	275413	278942	SPCC962.06c	SPAP8A3.06	bpb1	uaf2	sf1|ods3	SPAP8A3.06|ods2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Huang T (2002)	12374752	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516985	2538832	2539645	275413	276200	SPCC962.06c	SPBC146.07	bpb1	prp2	sf1|ods3	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Huang T (2002)	12374752	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516986	2539645	2542482	276200	278942	SPBC146.07	SPAP8A3.06	prp2	uaf2	mis11|ods1|uaf1	SPAP8A3.06|ods2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Huang T (2002)	12374752	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516987	2542517	2542517	278975	278975	SPACUNK4.14	SPACUNK4.14	mdb1	mdb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Luo S (2015)	26160178	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516988	2542517	2542517	278975	278975	SPACUNK4.14	SPACUNK4.14	mdb1	mdb1	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Luo S (2015)	26160178	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516989	2542517	2542517	278975	278975	SPACUNK4.14	SPACUNK4.14	mdb1	mdb1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Luo S (2015)	26160178	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516990	2542632	2542388	279086	278852	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC1834.06c	cdc25	pmo25	sal2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Mendoza M (2005)	16325501	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516991	3361413	2540604	280489	277130	SPATRNASER.03	SPBC25D12.05	SPATRNASER.03	trm1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Niederberger C (1999)	10611485	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516992	2543544	2539686	279961	276241	SPAC664.07c	SPBC1734.06	rad9	rhp18	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kai M (2007)	17515930	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516993	2543544	2543580	279961	279995	SPAC664.07c	SPAC644.14c	rad9	rad51	-	rhp51	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kai M (2007)	17515930	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516994	2543544	2543577	279961	279992	SPAC664.07c	SPAC4H3.05	rad9	srs2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kai M (2007)	17515930	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516995	2543544	2543358	279961	279780	SPAC664.07c	SPAC688.10	rad9	rev3	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kai M (2007)	17515930	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516996	2543544	2539666	279961	276221	SPAC664.07c	SPBC16A3.11	rad9	eso1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kai M (2007)	17515930	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516997	2540244	2543544	276776	279961	SPBC336.01	SPAC664.07c	fbh1	rad9	fdh|fdh1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kai M (2007)	17515930	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516998	2540020	2541580	276564	278077	SPBC16D10.09	SPAC1687.05	pcn1	pli1	pcn	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kai M (2007)	17515930	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2516999	2540020	2543544	276564	279961	SPBC16D10.09	SPAC664.07c	pcn1	rad9	pcn	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kai M (2007)	17515930	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517000	2539686	2541580	276241	278077	SPBC1734.06	SPAC1687.05	rhp18	pli1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kai M (2007)	17515930	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517001	2539686	2543580	276241	279995	SPBC1734.06	SPAC644.14c	rhp18	rad51	-	rhp51	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kai M (2007)	17515930	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517002	2543544	2543577	279961	279992	SPAC664.07c	SPAC4H3.05	rad9	srs2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kai M (2007)	17515930	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517003	2543544	2538720	279961	275304	SPAC664.07c	SPCC338.05c	rad9	mms2	-	spm2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kai M (2007)	17515930	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517004	2543481	2539869	279901	276415	SPAPB2B4.03	SPBC11B10.09	cig2	cdc2	cyc17	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bueno A (1993)	8455610	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517005	2542190	2539195	278665	275766	SPAC17C9.16c	SPCC18B5.01c	mfs1	bfr1	SPAC17C9.16c|SPAC9E9.16	SPCPJ732.04c|hba2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Kawashima SA (2012)	22840777	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517006	2540940	2539195	277456	275766	SPBC36.03c	SPCC18B5.01c	mfs3	bfr1	SPBC36.03c	SPCPJ732.04c|hba2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Kawashima SA (2012)	22840777	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517007	2540940	2539195	277456	275766	SPBC36.03c	SPCC18B5.01c	mfs3	bfr1	SPBC36.03c	SPCPJ732.04c|hba2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Kawashima SA (2012)	22840777	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517008	2540903	2539195	277419	275766	SPBC530.05	SPCC18B5.01c	prt1	bfr1	SPBC530.05	SPCPJ732.04c|hba2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Kawashima SA (2012)	22840777	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517009	2540903	2542140	277419	278616	SPBC530.05	SPAC1783.07c	prt1	pap1	SPBC530.05	caf3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Kawashima SA (2012)	22840777	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517010	2539087	2541051	275659	277566	SPCC1259.13	SPBC3E7.08c	chk1	rad13	rad27	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Griffiths DJ (1995)	8846774	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517011	2541643	2541051	278139	277566	SPAC14C4.13	SPBC3E7.08c	rad17	rad13	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Griffiths DJ (1995)	8846774	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517012	2539087	2539399	275659	275964	SPCC1259.13	SPCC550.13	chk1	dfp1	rad27	him1|rad35|dbf4	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Takeda T (1999)	10409743	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517013	2542008	2539495	278491	276058	SPAC2G11.07c	SPCC4F11.02	ptc3	ptc1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nguyen AN (1999)	10398679	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517014	2538822	2540737	275403	277260	SPCC1840.02c	SPBC19G7.05c	bgs4	bgs1	cwg1|orb11|pbr1|sph1	cps1|drc1	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Munoz J (2013)	24165938	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517015	2540737	2540383	277260	276912	SPBC19G7.05c	SPBC31E1.02c	bgs1	pmr1	cps1|drc1	cps5|pgak2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Cortes JC (2004)	15470240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517016	2543477	2540383	279897	276912	SPAPB2B4.04c	SPBC31E1.02c	SPAPB2B4.04c	pmr1	pmc1	cps5|pgak2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Cortes JC (2004)	15470240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517017	2543477	2540383	279897	276912	SPAPB2B4.04c	SPBC31E1.02c	SPAPB2B4.04c	pmr1	pmc1	cps5|pgak2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Cortes JC (2004)	15470240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517018	2540946	2540283	277462	276814	SPBC36.04	SPBC1A4.02c	cys11	leu1	cys1a	SPBC1E8.07c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Brzywczy J (2007)	17482430	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517019	2540946	2540849	277462	277366	SPBC36.04	SPBC428.11	cys11	met17	cys1a	SPBC428.11|cys2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Brzywczy J (2007)	17482430	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517020	2540849	2540283	277366	276814	SPBC428.11	SPBC1A4.02c	met17	leu1	SPBC428.11|cys2	SPBC1E8.07c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Brzywczy J (2007)	17482430	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517021	2541055	2541652	277570	278148	SPBC409.07c	SPAC24B11.06c	wis1	sty1	smf2|spc2	phh1|spc1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Shieh JC (1997)	9136929	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517022	2542873	2542632	279318	279086	SPAC9G1.02	SPAC24H6.05	wis4	cdc25	wak1|wik1	sal2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Shieh JC (1997)	9136929	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517023	2541055	2542632	277570	279086	SPBC409.07c	SPAC24H6.05	wis1	cdc25	smf2|spc2	sal2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Shieh JC (1997)	9136929	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517024	2542632	2541209	279086	277723	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC887.10	cdc25	mcs4	sal2	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Shieh JC (1997)	9136929	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517025	2541209	2541652	277723	278148	SPBC887.10	SPAC24B11.06c	mcs4	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Shieh JC (1997)	9136929	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517026	2541209	2542873	277723	279318	SPBC887.10	SPAC9G1.02	mcs4	wis4	-	wak1|wik1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Shieh JC (1997)	9136929	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517027	2542196	2540927	278671	277443	SPAC30D11.13	SPBC365.06	hus5	pmt3	ubc9	smt3|ubl2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ho JC (2003)	12597774	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517028	2542358	2538875	278823	275454	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC962.02c	clp1	bir1	flp1	SPCP31B10.10c|cut17|pbh1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Trautmann S (2004)	15525536	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517029	2543526	2543233	279944	279661	SPAC4A8.15c	SPAC630.03	cdc3	arp3	-	act2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	McCollum D (1996)	8978671	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517030	2539285	2539285	275853	275853	SPCC1672.02c	SPCC1672.02c	sap1	sap1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Bada M (2000)	10884352	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517031	2542264	2541917	278733	278407	SPAC17D4.04	SPAC23C4.17	trm401	trm402	SPAC17D4.04|SPAC458.01|trm4|trm4a	SPAC23C4.17|trm4|trm4b	Negative Genetic	genetic	Becker M (2012)	23074192	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517032	2540580	2539207	277106	275777	SPBC19C2.05	SPCC285.09c	ran1	cgs2	pat1	pde1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	DeVoti J (1991)	1657594	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517033	2540414	2542137	276942	278613	SPBC24C6.06	SPAC1D4.13	gpa1	byr1	-	ste1|ste3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Neiman AM (1993)	8443406	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517034	2540414	2540612	276942	277138	SPBC24C6.06	SPBC1D7.05	gpa1	byr2	-	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Neiman AM (1993)	8443406	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517035	2540329	2542140	276859	278616	SPBC29B5.01	SPAC1783.07c	atf1	pap1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	caf3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Paredes V (2003)	12855726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517036	2542482	2542772	278942	279221	SPAP8A3.06	SPAC16.02c	uaf2	srp2	SPAP8A3.06|ods2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Webb CJ (2004)	15121844	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517037	2539658	2543449	276213	279869	SPBC1105.17	SPAPB1A10.02	cnp1	scm3	sim2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Williams JS (2009)	19217403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517038	2543449	2539658	279869	276213	SPAPB1A10.02	SPBC1105.17	scm3	cnp1	-	sim2	Two-hybrid	physical	Williams JS (2009)	19217403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517039	2543449	2539658	279869	276213	SPAPB1A10.02	SPBC1105.17	scm3	cnp1	-	sim2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Williams JS (2009)	19217403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517040	2543449	2539214	279869	275784	SPAPB1A10.02	SPCC1672.10	scm3	mis16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Williams JS (2009)	19217403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517041	2543449	2542304	279869	278771	SPAPB1A10.02	SPAC1687.20c	scm3	mis6	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Williams JS (2009)	19217403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517042	2543449	2539214	279869	275784	SPAPB1A10.02	SPCC1672.10	scm3	mis16	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Williams JS (2009)	19217403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517043	2542304	2543449	278771	279869	SPAC1687.20c	SPAPB1A10.02	mis6	scm3	-	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Williams JS (2009)	19217403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517044	2541321	2543449	277833	279869	SPBP22H7.09c	SPAPB1A10.02	mis15	scm3	pi022|SPACTOKYO_453.12	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Williams JS (2009)	19217403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517045	2539658	2543449	276213	279869	SPBC1105.17	SPAPB1A10.02	cnp1	scm3	sim2	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Williams JS (2009)	19217403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517046	2543482	2543449	279902	279869	SPAC688.02c	SPAPB1A10.02	mis14	scm3	-	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Williams JS (2009)	19217403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517047	2540494	2543449	277022	279869	SPBC409.04c	SPAPB1A10.02	mis12	scm3	-	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Williams JS (2009)	19217403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517048	3361327	2543449	280403	279869	SPBC21.01	SPAPB1A10.02	mis17	scm3	SPBC776.19	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Williams JS (2009)	19217403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517049	2539214	2543449	275784	279869	SPCC1672.10	SPAPB1A10.02	mis16	scm3	-	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Williams JS (2009)	19217403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517050	2538763	2543449	275346	279869	SPCC970.12	SPAPB1A10.02	mis18	scm3	-	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Williams JS (2009)	19217403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517051	2539214	2543449	275784	279869	SPCC1672.10	SPAPB1A10.02	mis16	scm3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Williams JS (2009)	19217403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517052	2543449	2538763	279869	275346	SPAPB1A10.02	SPCC970.12	scm3	mis18	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Williams JS (2009)	19217403	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517053	2540354	2542463	276883	278924	SPBC29A3.13	SPAC1834.03c	pdp1	hhf1	-	h4.1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang Y (2009)	19250904	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517054	2540354	2539545	276883	276106	SPBC29A3.13	SPCC4B3.12	pdp1	set9	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang Y (2009)	19250904	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517055	2539545	2540354	276106	276883	SPCC4B3.12	SPBC29A3.13	set9	pdp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang Y (2009)	19250904	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517056	2543629	2541633	280043	278129	SPAC3H5.06c	SPAC664.01c	pol1	swi6	polA|swi7	SPAC824.10c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ahmed S (2001)	11581276	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517057	2541633	2543629	278129	280043	SPAC664.01c	SPAC3H5.06c	swi6	pol1	SPAC824.10c	polA|swi7	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ahmed S (2001)	11581276	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517058	2539869	2540027	276415	276571	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC1734.14c	cdc2	suc1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	p13	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Hayles J (1986)	16453733	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517059	2539838	2543629	276387	280043	SPBC1347.10	SPAC3H5.06c	cdc23	pol1	mcm10	polA|swi7	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Fien K (2004)	14766746	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517060	2543629	2539838	280043	276387	SPAC3H5.06c	SPBC1347.10	pol1	cdc23	polA|swi7	mcm10	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Fien K (2004)	14766746	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517061	2542358	2542632	278823	279086	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC24H6.05	clp1	cdc25	flp1	sal2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Vazquez-Novelle MD (2005)	15911625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517062	2540992	2543281	277508	279708	SPBC342.05	SPAC23C4.18c	crb2	rad4	rhp9	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Qu M (2013)	24074952	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517063	2539004	2543668	275578	280082	SPCC4G3.05c	SPAC9.05	mus81	fml1	slx3	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Lorenz A (2012)	22723423	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517064	2541556	2542799	278055	279247	SPAC6G9.10c	SPAC1687.01	sen1	rpc19	-	SPAPYUL23.01|rpa17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Legros P (2014)	25392932	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517065	2541556	2542233	278055	278705	SPAC6G9.10c	SPAC1B3.12c	sen1	rpb10	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Legros P (2014)	25392932	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517066	2541556	2541521	278055	278022	SPAC6G9.10c	SPAC22A12.05	sen1	rpc11	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Legros P (2014)	25392932	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517067	2541556	2543393	278055	279815	SPAC6G9.10c	SPAC4G9.08c	sen1	rpc2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Legros P (2014)	25392932	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517068	2541556	2543417	278055	279839	SPAC6G9.10c	SPAPB1E7.03	sen1	rpc82	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Legros P (2014)	25392932	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517069	2541556	2543653	278055	280067	SPAC6G9.10c	SPAPB1E7.10	sen1	rpc17	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Legros P (2014)	25392932	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517070	2541556	2539663	278055	276218	SPAC6G9.10c	SPBC1289.07c	sen1	rpc40	-	rpa42	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Legros P (2014)	25392932	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517071	2541556	2541094	278055	277609	SPAC6G9.10c	SPBC651.08c	sen1	rpc1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Legros P (2014)	25392932	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517072	2541556	2541197	278055	277711	SPAC6G9.10c	SPBC839.12	sen1	rpc31	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Legros P (2014)	25392932	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517073	2541556	2538851	278055	275432	SPAC6G9.10c	SPCC18.07	sen1	rpc53	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Legros P (2014)	25392932	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517074	2541556	2538992	278055	275566	SPAC6G9.10c	SPCC290.02	sen1	rpc34	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Legros P (2014)	25392932	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517075	2541556	2538885	278055	275463	SPAC6G9.10c	SPCC330.13	sen1	rpc37	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Legros P (2014)	25392932	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517076	2541556	2541503	278055	278005	SPAC6G9.10c	SPAC22A12.01c	sen1	pso2	-	SPAC56F8.17c|snm1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Legros P (2014)	25392932	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517077	2541556	2540510	278055	277038	SPAC6G9.10c	SPBC2G5.07c	sen1	rpc25	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Legros P (2014)	25392932	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517078	2539817	2541556	276367	278055	SPBC146.03c	SPAC6G9.10c	cut3	sen1	smc4	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Legros P (2014)	25392932	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517079	2539817	2542845	276367	279291	SPBC146.03c	SPAC824.04	cut3	SPAC824.04	smc4	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Legros P (2014)	25392932	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517080	2539869	2539123	276415	275695	SPBC11B10.09	SPCC18B5.03	cdc2	wee1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Enoch T (1992)	1427071	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517081	2539123	2541643	275695	278139	SPCC18B5.03	SPAC14C4.13	wee1	rad17	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Enoch T (1992)	1427071	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517082	2539123	2542558	275695	279014	SPCC18B5.03	SPAC1952.07	wee1	rad1	-	rad19	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Enoch T (1992)	1427071	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517083	2539123	2541746	275695	278240	SPCC18B5.03	SPAC20G4.04c	wee1	hus1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Enoch T (1992)	1427071	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517084	2539123	2541620	275695	278117	SPCC18B5.03	SPAC2G11.12	wee1	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Enoch T (1992)	1427071	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517085	2539123	2542196	275695	278671	SPCC18B5.03	SPAC30D11.13	wee1	hus5	-	ubc9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Enoch T (1992)	1427071	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517086	2539123	2540719	275695	277242	SPCC18B5.03	SPBC216.05	wee1	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Enoch T (1992)	1427071	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517087	2541984	2540051	278469	276589	SPAC23A1.10	SPBC32H8.12c	tef102	act1	ef1a-b|ef1a-d|efa1|SPBC24E9.15c|tef1-b|tef1-d	cps8|pi012	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Suda M (1999)	10526238	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517088	2542523	2541806	278981	278297	SPAC18B11.04	SPAC4G8.13c	ncs1	prz1	-	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Hamasaki-Katagiri N (2010)	20018864	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517089	2541806	2542523	278297	278981	SPAC4G8.13c	SPAC18B11.04	prz1	ncs1	-	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Hamasaki-Katagiri N (2010)	20018864	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517090	2540175	3361518	276708	280594	SPBC106.16	SPAC13C5.01c	pre6	pre9	-	SPAC13C5.01c|SPAC31A2.17c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517091	2540175	2542907	276708	279351	SPBC106.16	SPAC1420.03	pre6	rpn501	-	rpn5|rpn5-a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517092	2540175	3361455	276708	280531	SPBC106.16	SPAC1782.01	pre6	ecm29	-	SPAPYUG7.07	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517093	2540175	2542062	276708	278540	SPBC106.16	SPAC22F8.06	pre6	pam1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517094	2540175	2541805	276708	278296	SPBC106.16	SPAC23D3.07	pre6	pup1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517095	2540175	2541807	276708	278298	SPBC106.16	SPAC23G3.11	pre6	rpn6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517096	2540175	2543122	276708	279554	SPBC106.16	SPAC31A2.04c	pre6	pre1	-	SPAC31A2.04c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517097	2540175	2543040	276708	279475	SPBC106.16	SPAC31G5.13	pre6	rpn11	-	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517098	2540175	2543205	276708	279634	SPBC106.16	SPAC323.02c	pre6	pup2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517099	2540175	3361462	276708	280538	SPBC106.16	SPAC3A11.12c	pre6	rpt5	-	pam2|tbp1|SPAC3H5.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517100	2540175	2543623	276708	280037	SPBC106.16	SPAC4A8.13c	pre6	pts1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517101	2540175	2543114	276708	279546	SPBC106.16	SPAC607.05	pre6	rpn9	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517102	2540175	2543682	276708	280096	SPBC106.16	SPAC637.10c	pre6	rpn10	-	pus1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517103	2540175	2542559	276708	279015	SPBC106.16	SPAC6G10.04c	pre6	pre5	-	SPAC6G10.04c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517104	2540175	2543347	276708	279769	SPBC106.16	SPAPB8E5.02c	pre6	rpn502	-	rpn5|rpn5-b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517105	2540175	2540175	276708	276708	SPBC106.16	SPBC106.16	pre6	pre6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517106	2540175	2540109	276708	276646	SPBC106.16	SPBC119.01	pre6	rpn3	-	SPBPJ4664.07	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517107	2540175	2539862	276708	276409	SPBC106.16	SPBC16C6.07c	pre6	rpt1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517108	2540175	2540025	276708	276569	SPBC106.16	SPBC16G5.01	pre6	rpn12	-	SPBC342.07|mts3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517109	2540175	2540191	276708	276724	SPBC106.16	SPBC17D11.07c	pre6	rpn2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517110	2540175	2540487	276708	277015	SPBC106.16	SPBC23G7.12c	pre6	rpt6	-	let1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517111	2540175	2540980	276708	277496	SPBC106.16	SPBC342.04	pre6	rpn1301	-	rpn13|rpn13a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517112	2540175	2540939	276708	277455	SPBC106.16	SPBC4.07c	pre6	rpt2	-	mts2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517113	2540175	2540956	276708	277472	SPBC106.16	SPBC409.06	pre6	uch2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517114	2540175	2540878	276708	277395	SPBC106.16	SPBC4C3.10c	pre6	pre3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517115	2540175	2540875	276708	277392	SPBC106.16	SPBC577.10	pre6	pre4	-	SPBC577.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517116	2540175	2540794	276708	277313	SPBC106.16	SPBC582.07c	pre6	rpn7	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517117	2540175	2541139	276708	277654	SPBC106.16	SPBC646.16	pre6	scl1	-	SPBC646.16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517118	2540175	2541268	276708	277782	SPBC106.16	SPBP19A11.03c	pre6	mts4	-	rpn1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517119	2540175	2539026	276708	275599	SPBC106.16	SPCC1442.06	pre6	pre8	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517120	2540175	2539122	276708	275694	SPBC106.16	SPCC14G10.03c	pre6	ump1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517121	2540175	2538912	276708	275489	SPBC106.16	SPCC1682.10	pre6	rpn8	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517122	2540175	2539189	276708	275760	SPBC106.16	SPCC1682.16	pre6	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517123	2540175	2539182	276708	275753	SPBC106.16	SPCC16A11.16c	pre6	rpn1302	-	rpn13|rpn13b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517124	2540175	2539378	276708	275944	SPBC106.16	SPCC1795.04c	pre6	pre10	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517125	2540175	2539539	276708	276101	SPBC106.16	SPCC576.10c	pre6	rpt3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517126	2540175	2539401	276708	275966	SPBC106.16	SPCC63.12c	pre6	pup3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Takeda K (2010)	20133687	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517127	2541957	2540589	278444	277115	SPAC23C11.16	SPBC20F10.06	plo1	mad2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Reynolds N (2003)	12615979	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517128	2541957	2539205	278444	275775	SPAC23C11.16	SPCC4B3.15	plo1	mid1	-	dmf1	Two-hybrid	physical	Reynolds N (2003)	12615979	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517129	2543086	2540121	279519	276658	SPAC30D11.10	SPBC119.14	rad52	rti1	rad22|rad22A	rad22B	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	van den Bosch M (2001)	11104907	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517130	2543086	2540121	279519	276658	SPAC30D11.10	SPBC119.14	rad52	rti1	rad22|rad22A	rad22B	Dosage Rescue	genetic	van den Bosch M (2001)	11104907	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517131	2539123	2540027	275695	276571	SPCC18B5.03	SPBC1734.14c	wee1	suc1	-	p13	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Parker LL (1992)	1372994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517132	2539418	2540222	275983	276755	SPCC757.07c	SPBC32F12.03c	ctt1	gpx1	cta1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yamada K (1999)	10455235	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517133	2539123	2540885	275695	277402	SPCC18B5.03	SPBC660.14	wee1	mik1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Lundgren K (1991)	1706223	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517134	2539004	2543670	275578	280084	SPCC4G3.05c	SPAPB1E7.06c	mus81	eme1	slx3	mms4|slx2	Two-hybrid	physical	Boddy MN (2001)	11719193	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517135	2539004	2540345	275578	276874	SPCC4G3.05c	SPBC19C7.09c	mus81	uve1	slx3	uvde	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Boddy MN (2001)	11719193	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517136	2539004	2541051	275578	277566	SPCC4G3.05c	SPBC3E7.08c	mus81	rad13	slx3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Boddy MN (2001)	11719193	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517137	2539004	2542150	275578	278626	SPCC4G3.05c	SPAC17A5.11	mus81	rec12	slx3	spo11	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Boddy MN (2001)	11719193	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517138	2539004	2540588	275578	277114	SPCC4G3.05c	SPBC21B10.12	mus81	rec6	slx3	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Boddy MN (2001)	11719193	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517139	2543670	2542150	280084	278626	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPAC17A5.11	eme1	rec12	mms4|slx2	spo11	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Boddy MN (2001)	11719193	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517140	2543670	2540588	280084	277114	SPAPB1E7.06c	SPBC21B10.12	eme1	rec6	mms4|slx2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Boddy MN (2001)	11719193	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517141	2541614	3361527	278111	280603	SPAC29A4.20	SPATRNALYS.02	elp3	SPATRNALYS.02	kat9	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Fernandez-Vazquez J (2013)	23874237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517142	2541614	3361503	278111	280579	SPAC29A4.20	SPATRNALYS.03	elp3	SPATRNALYS.03	kat9	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Fernandez-Vazquez J (2013)	23874237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517143	2541614	14217792	278111	4254154	SPAC29A4.20	SPBTRNALYS.06	elp3	SPBTRNALYS.06	kat9	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Fernandez-Vazquez J (2013)	23874237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517144	2540582	2542358	277108	278823	SPBC26H8.07c	SPAC1782.09c	nda3	clp1	alp12|ben1	flp1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Wolfe BA (2006)	16950131	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517145	2539338	2542765	275904	279215	SPCC338.07c	SPAC15E1.08	naa15	naa10	-	ard1	Co-purification	physical	Liszczak G (2013)	23912279	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517146	2540992	2539087	277508	275659	SPBC342.05	SPCC1259.13	crb2	chk1	rhp9	rad27	Protein-peptide	physical	Qu M (2012)	22792081	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517147	2540097	2539505	276635	276068	SPBC11C11.03	SPCC736.14	ndc80	dis1	ndc10|tid3	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Hsu KS (2011)	21256022	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517148	2540097	2539505	276635	276068	SPBC11C11.03	SPCC736.14	ndc80	dis1	ndc10|tid3	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Hsu KS (2011)	21256022	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517149	2542358	2539505	278823	276068	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC736.14	clp1	dis1	flp1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chen CT (2008)	18951025	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517150	2542358	2541975	278823	278460	SPAC1782.09c	SPAC20G8.05c	clp1	cdc15	flp1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chen CT (2008)	18951025	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517151	2542358	2539205	278823	275775	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC4B3.15	clp1	mid1	flp1	dmf1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chen CT (2008)	18951025	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517152	2542358	2539513	278823	276075	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC645.05c	clp1	myo2	flp1	rng5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chen CT (2008)	18951025	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517153	2541305	2542078	277817	278555	SPBC9B6.08	SPAC26A3.05	clc1	chc1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	de Leon N (2013)	23977061	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517154	2539869	2541590	276415	278087	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC57A10.02	cdc2	cdr2	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Young PG (1987)	3448096	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517155	2539869	2543666	276415	280080	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC644.06c	cdc2	cdr1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	nim1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Young PG (1987)	3448096	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517156	2540234	2541590	276766	278087	SPBC336.12c	SPAC57A10.02	cdc10	cdr2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Young PG (1987)	3448096	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517157	2540234	2543666	276766	280080	SPBC336.12c	SPAC644.06c	cdc10	cdr1	-	nim1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Young PG (1987)	3448096	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517158	2539517	2542293	276079	278761	SPCC576.15c	SPAC17G8.14c	ksg1	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Graeub R (2003)	14625898	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517159	2539129	2541720	275701	278214	SPCC338.14	SPAC23H3.13c	ado1	gpa2	SPCC338.14	git8	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Estill M (2015)	25547512	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517160	2539129	2541801	275701	278292	SPCC338.14	SPAC2F7.08c	ado1	snf5	SPCC338.14	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Estill M (2015)	25547512	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517161	2539129	2541339	275701	277850	SPCC338.14	SPBP4G3.02	ado1	pho1	SPCC338.14	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Estill M (2015)	25547512	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517162	2539129	2540501	275701	277029	SPCC338.14	SPBC27B12.11c	ado1	pho7	SPCC338.14	SPBC27B12.11c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Estill M (2015)	25547512	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517163	2539129	2539781	275701	276331	SPCC338.14	SPBC106.10	ado1	pka1	SPCC338.14	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Estill M (2015)	25547512	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517164	2539129	2539244	275701	275814	SPCC338.14	SPCC1672.06c	ado1	asp1	SPCC338.14	vip1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Estill M (2015)	25547512	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517165	2542890	2541720	279334	278214	SPAC13G6.14	SPAC23H3.13c	aps1	gpa2	SPAC24B11.03	git8	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Estill M (2015)	25547512	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517166	2542890	2541801	279334	278292	SPAC13G6.14	SPAC2F7.08c	aps1	snf5	SPAC24B11.03	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Estill M (2015)	25547512	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517167	2542890	2541339	279334	277850	SPAC13G6.14	SPBP4G3.02	aps1	pho1	SPAC24B11.03	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Estill M (2015)	25547512	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517168	2542890	2540501	279334	277029	SPAC13G6.14	SPBC27B12.11c	aps1	pho7	SPAC24B11.03	SPBC27B12.11c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Estill M (2015)	25547512	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517169	2542890	2539781	279334	276331	SPAC13G6.14	SPBC106.10	aps1	pka1	SPAC24B11.03	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Estill M (2015)	25547512	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517170	2542890	2539244	279334	275814	SPAC13G6.14	SPCC1672.06c	aps1	asp1	SPAC24B11.03	vip1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Estill M (2015)	25547512	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517171	2543327	2541720	279750	278214	SPAC1D4.06c	SPAC23H3.13c	csk1	gpa2	-	git8	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Estill M (2015)	25547512	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517172	2543327	2541801	279750	278292	SPAC1D4.06c	SPAC2F7.08c	csk1	snf5	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Estill M (2015)	25547512	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517173	2543327	2541339	279750	277850	SPAC1D4.06c	SPBP4G3.02	csk1	pho1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Estill M (2015)	25547512	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517174	2543327	2540501	279750	277029	SPAC1D4.06c	SPBC27B12.11c	csk1	pho7	-	SPBC27B12.11c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Estill M (2015)	25547512	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517175	2543327	2539781	279750	276331	SPAC1D4.06c	SPBC106.10	csk1	pka1	-	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Estill M (2015)	25547512	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517176	2543327	2539244	279750	275814	SPAC1D4.06c	SPCC1672.06c	csk1	asp1	-	vip1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Estill M (2015)	25547512	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517177	2540810	2539207	277329	275777	SPBC19C7.03	SPCC285.09c	cyr1	cgs2	git2	pde1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Demirbas D (2010)	21118717	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517178	2541153	2540234	277668	276766	SPBC725.16	SPBC336.12c	res1	cdc10	sct1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ayte J (1995)	7739540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517179	2539540	2540241	276102	276773	SPCC736.12c	SPBC32H8.11	mmi1	mei4	-	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Harigaya Y (2006)	16823445	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517180	5802740	2539540	857878	276102	SPNCRNA.103	SPCC736.12c	sme2	mmi1	SPNCRNA.1341	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Harigaya Y (2006)	16823445	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517181	2539540	2542080	276102	278557	SPCC736.12c	SPAC27D7.03c	mmi1	mei2	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Harigaya Y (2006)	16823445	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517182	5802740	2543630	857878	280044	SPNCRNA.103	SPAC1F3.01	sme2	rrp6	SPNCRNA.1341	SPAC3H8.11	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Harigaya Y (2006)	16823445	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517183	2540584	2542106	277110	278582	SPBC28F2.07	SPAC8E11.03c	sfr1	dmc1	dds20|mug13	dmp1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Willis N (2009)	19037101	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517184	2541620	2542106	278117	278582	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC8E11.03c	rqh1	dmc1	hus2|rad12|rec9	dmp1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Willis N (2009)	19037101	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517185	2540584	2540574	277110	277101	SPBC28F2.07	SPBC409.03	sfr1	swi5	dds20|mug13	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Willis N (2009)	19037101	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517186	2541620	2540574	278117	277101	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC409.03	rqh1	swi5	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Willis N (2009)	19037101	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517187	2540584	3361456	277110	280532	SPBC28F2.07	SPAC1142.03c	sfr1	swi2	dds20|mug13	SPAC17G6.20c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Willis N (2009)	19037101	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517188	2541620	3361456	278117	280532	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC1142.03c	rqh1	swi2	hus2|rad12|rec9	SPAC17G6.20c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Willis N (2009)	19037101	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517189	2540584	2540728	277110	277251	SPBC28F2.07	SPBC216.06c	sfr1	swi1	dds20|mug13	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Willis N (2009)	19037101	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517190	2539004	2540728	275578	277251	SPCC4G3.05c	SPBC216.06c	mus81	swi1	slx3	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Willis N (2009)	19037101	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517191	2541620	2540728	278117	277251	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC216.06c	rqh1	swi1	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Willis N (2009)	19037101	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517192	2542207	3361420	278682	280496	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAPB17E12.04c	ddb1	csn2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517193	2542207	2540352	278682	276881	SPAC17H9.10c	SPBC215.03c	ddb1	csn1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bayne EH (2014)	25274039	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517194	2540084	2539958	276622	276502	SPBC119.11c	SPBC1718.07c	pac1	zfs1	hcs|rnt1|snm1	moc4	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kanoh J (1995)	8534915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517195	2540992	2541620	277508	278117	SPBC342.05	SPAC2G11.12	crb2	rqh1	rhp9	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wilson S (1999)	10373582	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517196	2540992	2543086	277508	279519	SPBC342.05	SPAC30D11.10	crb2	rad52	rhp9	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Wilson S (1999)	10373582	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517197	2541620	2543086	278117	279519	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC30D11.10	rqh1	rad52	hus2|rad12|rec9	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Wilson S (1999)	10373582	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517198	2538930	2541213	275506	277727	SPCC188.13c	SPBC887.14c	dcr1	pfh1	SPCC584.10c	pif1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Castel SE (2014)	25417108	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517199	2538930	2539805	275506	276355	SPCC188.13c	SPBC146.09c	dcr1	lsd1	SPCC584.10c	saf110|swm1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Castel SE (2014)	25417108	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517200	2540329	2542047	276859	278528	SPBC29B5.01	SPAC21E11.03c	atf1	pcr1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	mts2	Co-fractionation	physical	Wahls WP (1994)	7958849	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517201	2539087	2538959	275659	275533	SPCC1259.13	SPCC18B5.11c	chk1	cds1	rad27	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Shim YS (2000)	11073995	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517202	2540565	2540291	277092	276822	SPBC1D7.04	SPBC337.12	mlo3	red5	-	SPBC337.12	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sugiyama T (2013)	23658229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517203	2540291	2542433	276822	278895	SPBC337.12	SPAC17G6.14c	red5	uap56	SPBC337.12	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sugiyama T (2013)	23658229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517204	2540291	2543058	276822	279492	SPBC337.12	SPAC3G6.02	red5	rpn15	SPBC337.12	dss1|sem1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sugiyama T (2013)	23658229	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517205	2540880	2539869	277397	276415	SPBC582.03	SPBC11B10.09	cdc13	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Fisher DL (1996)	8631306	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517206	2540880	2540234	277397	276766	SPBC582.03	SPBC336.12c	cdc13	cdc10	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Fisher DL (1996)	8631306	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517207	2540810	2543351	277329	279773	SPBC19C7.03	SPAC8C9.03	cyr1	cgs1	git2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kawamukai M (1991)	1863602	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517208	2542414	2542244	278878	278714	SPAC6F6.16c	SPAC19G12.13c	tpz1	poz1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Harland JL (2014)	25330395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517209	2542414	2542703	278878	279156	SPAC6F6.16c	SPAC26H5.06	tpz1	pot1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Harland JL (2014)	25330395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517210	2542414	2539352	278878	275918	SPAC6F6.16c	SPCC188.07	tpz1	ccq1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Harland JL (2014)	25330395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517211	2542414	2542244	278878	278714	SPAC6F6.16c	SPAC19G12.13c	tpz1	poz1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Harland JL (2014)	25330395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517212	2542414	2542703	278878	279156	SPAC6F6.16c	SPAC26H5.06	tpz1	pot1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Harland JL (2014)	25330395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517213	2542414	2539352	278878	275918	SPAC6F6.16c	SPCC188.07	tpz1	ccq1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Harland JL (2014)	25330395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517214	2542244	2542414	278714	278878	SPAC19G12.13c	SPAC6F6.16c	poz1	tpz1	-	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Harland JL (2014)	25330395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517215	2542414	2542244	278878	278714	SPAC6F6.16c	SPAC19G12.13c	tpz1	poz1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Harland JL (2014)	25330395	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517216	3361306	2542757	280382	279207	SPBC6B1.09c	SPAC13C5.07	nbs1	mre11	slr10	rad32	Two-hybrid	physical	Limbo O (2012)	23080121	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517217	2541861	2543222	278351	279650	SPAC5D6.08c	SPAC821.08c	mes1	slp1	-	cdc20	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Izawa D (2005)	15791259	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517218	2541840	2540283	278331	276814	SPAC23H3.03c	SPBC1A4.02c	npr2	leu1	-	SPBC1E8.07c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ma N (2013)	23934889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517219	2543339	2540283	279762	276814	SPAC630.13c	SPBC1A4.02c	tsc2	leu1	-	SPBC1E8.07c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ma N (2013)	23934889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517220	2539088	2541840	275660	278331	SPCC777.05	SPAC23H3.03c	gtr2	npr2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ma N (2013)	23934889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517221	2541840	2539088	278331	275660	SPAC23H3.03c	SPCC777.05	npr2	gtr2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ma N (2013)	23934889	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517222	2540239	2540471	276771	276999	SPBC32H8.10	SPBC19F8.07	cdk9	mcs6	SPACTOKYO_453.22	cdk7|crk1|mop1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Viladevall L (2009)	19328067	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517223	3361470	2542367	280546	278831	SPAC3G9.01	SPAC1783.03	nsk1	fta2	-	sma2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chen JS (2011)	22065639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517224	3361470	2542004	280546	278487	SPAC3G9.01	SPAC27F1.04c	nsk1	nuf2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chen JS (2011)	22065639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517225	3361470	2543382	280546	279804	SPAC3G9.01	SPAC890.02c	nsk1	alp7	-	mia1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chen JS (2011)	22065639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517226	3361470	2540361	280546	276890	SPAC3G9.01	SPBC2F12.13	nsk1	klp5	-	sot1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chen JS (2011)	22065639	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517227	2539869	2542358	276415	278823	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC1782.09c	cdc2	clp1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	flp1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Esteban V (2004)	15128870	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517228	2540941	2541185	277457	277699	SPBC365.05c	SPBC6B1.07	slu7	prp1	-	zer1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Banerjee S (2013)	23754748	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517229	2540941	3361572	277457	280648	SPBC365.05c	SPSNRNA.06	slu7	snu6	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Banerjee S (2013)	23754748	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517230	2539290	5802954	275858	858092	SPCC188.06c	SPNCRNA.98	srp54	srp7	-	srp	Co-purification	physical	Selinger D (1994)	8041618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517231	2540099	2540099	276637	276637	SPBC16H5.11c	SPBC16H5.11c	skb1	skb1	rmt5	rmt5	Two-hybrid	physical	Gilbreth M (1996)	8943016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517232	2542285	2540099	278753	276637	SPAC17H9.09c	SPBC16H5.11c	ras1	skb1	ste5	rmt5	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Gilbreth M (1996)	8943016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517233	2541726	2540099	278220	276637	SPAC22H10.07	SPBC16H5.11c	scd2	skb1	ral3	rmt5	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Gilbreth M (1996)	8943016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517234	2540624	2539513	277150	276075	SPBC24C6.07	SPCC645.05c	cdc14	myo2	-	rng5	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Mishra M (2004)	15265986	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517235	2543629	2540601	280043	277127	SPAC3H5.06c	SPBC29A3.14c	pol1	trt1	polA|swi7	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dahlen M (2003)	12697806	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517236	2540601	2543629	277127	280043	SPBC29A3.14c	SPAC3H5.06c	trt1	pol1	-	polA|swi7	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dahlen M (2003)	12697806	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517237	2540601	2543629	277127	280043	SPBC29A3.14c	SPAC3H5.06c	trt1	pol1	-	polA|swi7	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Dahlen M (2003)	12697806	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517238	2540601	2543323	277127	279746	SPBC29A3.14c	SPAC6B12.10c	trt1	spp1	-	pri1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Dahlen M (2003)	12697806	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517239	2539933	2540601	276477	277127	SPBC17D11.06	SPBC29A3.14c	spp2	trt1	pri2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Dahlen M (2003)	12697806	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517240	2542736	2542736	279186	279186	SPAC25G10.02	SPAC25G10.02	cce1	cce1	ydc2	ydc2	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Ceschini S (2001)	11726496	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517241	2542800	2541741	279248	278235	SPAP7G5.03	SPAC20G4.02c	prm1	fus1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Curto M A (2014)	24514900	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517242	2542800	2543166	279248	279597	SPAP7G5.03	SPAC31G5.07	prm1	dni1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Curto M A (2014)	24514900	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517243	2542800	2540733	279248	277256	SPAP7G5.03	SPBC4.01	prm1	dni2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Curto M A (2014)	24514900	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517244	2542664	2541029	279117	277544	SPAC1071.10c	SPBC409.10	pma1	ade7	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ulaszewski S (1987)	2878925	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517245	2539781	2542492	276331	278951	SPBC106.10	SPAC1B9.02c	pka1	sck1	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Soto T (1997)	9245826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517246	2541652	9406964	278148	1028327	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC70.12c	sty1	ecl1	phh1|spc1	SPNG2611|SPNCRNA.518	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ohtsuka H (2008)	18422613	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517247	2543339	2540853	279762	277370	SPAC630.13c	SPBC428.16c	tsc2	rhb1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	van Slegtenhorst M (2004)	14718525	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517248	2541089	2542285	277604	278753	SPBC646.09c	SPAC17H9.09c	int6	ras1	yin6	ste5	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yen HC (2003)	12553909	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517249	2538758	2538951	275341	275525	SPCC1739.12	SPCC297.03	ppe1	ssp1	esp1|ppx1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Matsusaka T (1995)	7628434	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517250	2538951	2542632	275525	279086	SPCC297.03	SPAC24H6.05	ssp1	cdc25	-	sal2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Matsusaka T (1995)	7628434	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517251	2539180	2538951	275751	275525	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC297.03	sts5	ssp1	orb4	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Matsusaka T (1995)	7628434	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517252	2539180	2539109	275751	275681	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC74.03c	sts5	ssp2	orb4	ucp9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Matsusaka T (1995)	7628434	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517253	2541599	2543360	278096	279782	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC664.10	sid2	klp2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mana-Capelli S (2012)	23087209	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517254	2539205	2543030	275775	279466	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC12B10.10	mid1	nod1	dmf1	SPAC12B10.10	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Zhu YH (2013)	23966468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517255	2541699	2543030	278195	279466	SPAP8A3.08	SPAC12B10.10	cdc4	nod1	-	SPAC12B10.10	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Zhu YH (2013)	23966468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517256	2541699	2543168	278195	279599	SPAP8A3.08	SPAC31A2.16	cdc4	gef2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Zhu YH (2013)	23966468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517257	2539205	2543168	275775	279599	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC31A2.16	mid1	gef2	dmf1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Zhu YH (2013)	23966468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517258	2541599	2543168	278096	279599	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC31A2.16	sid2	gef2	-	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Zhu YH (2013)	23966468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517259	2540660	3361476	277185	280552	SPBC21.06c	SPAC16A10.04	cdc7	rho4	its10|pld1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Zhu YH (2013)	23966468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517260	2539149	3361476	275721	280552	SPCC1739.11c	SPAC16A10.04	cdc11	rho4	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Zhu YH (2013)	23966468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517261	2541975	2543168	278460	279599	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC31A2.16	cdc15	gef2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhu YH (2013)	23966468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517262	2543129	2543030	279561	279466	SPAC4F8.13c	SPAC12B10.10	rng2	nod1	-	SPAC12B10.10	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Zhu YH (2013)	23966468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517263	2543129	2543168	279561	279599	SPAC4F8.13c	SPAC31A2.16	rng2	gef2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Zhu YH (2013)	23966468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517264	2540660	2543030	277185	279466	SPBC21.06c	SPAC12B10.10	cdc7	nod1	its10|pld1	SPAC12B10.10	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Zhu YH (2013)	23966468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517265	2540660	2543168	277185	279599	SPBC21.06c	SPAC31A2.16	cdc7	gef2	its10|pld1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Zhu YH (2013)	23966468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517266	2541599	3361476	278096	280552	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC16A10.04	sid2	rho4	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Zhu YH (2013)	23966468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517267	2541599	2543168	278096	279599	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC31A2.16	sid2	gef2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Zhu YH (2013)	23966468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517268	2539149	2543030	275721	279466	SPCC1739.11c	SPAC12B10.10	cdc11	nod1	-	SPAC12B10.10	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Zhu YH (2013)	23966468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517269	2539149	2543168	275721	279599	SPCC1739.11c	SPAC31A2.16	cdc11	gef2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Zhu YH (2013)	23966468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517270	2541957	2543030	278444	279466	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC12B10.10	plo1	nod1	-	SPAC12B10.10	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Zhu YH (2013)	23966468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517271	2541957	2543168	278444	279599	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC31A2.16	plo1	gef2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Zhu YH (2013)	23966468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517272	3361476	2543168	280552	279599	SPAC16A10.04	SPAC31A2.16	rho4	gef2	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Zhu YH (2013)	23966468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517273	2541612	2543168	278109	279599	SPAC1F7.04	SPAC31A2.16	rho1	gef2	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Zhu YH (2013)	23966468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517274	2542013	2543168	278496	279599	SPAC20H4.11c	SPAC31A2.16	rho5	gef2	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Zhu YH (2013)	23966468	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517275	2542184	2539442	278659	276005	SPAC17C9.13c	SPCC5E4.04	cut8	cut1	-	ptr4	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Samejima I (1994)	8065367	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517276	2543576	2541940	279991	278427	SPAC4A8.05c	SPAC27F1.02c	myp2	cdc8	myo3	fus4	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Takaine M (2015)	26092938	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517277	2539513	2543576	276075	279991	SPCC645.05c	SPAC4A8.05c	myo2	myp2	rng5	myo3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Takaine M (2015)	26092938	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517278	14218023	2540223	4254385	276756	SPAC9G1.15c	SPBC32F12.04	mzt1	gtb1	tam4	tug1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Masuda H (2013)	23885124	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517279	14218023	2540392	4254385	276920	SPAC9G1.15c	SPBC365.15	mzt1	alp4	tam4	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Masuda H (2013)	23885124	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517280	14218023	2540690	4254385	277215	SPAC9G1.15c	SPBC428.20c	mzt1	alp6	tam4	SPBC902.01c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Masuda H (2013)	23885124	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517281	2542200	2542677	278675	279130	SPAC19D5.01	SPAC26F1.10c	pyp2	pyp1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Millar JB (1995)	7657164	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517282	2542632	2541652	279086	278148	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC24B11.06c	cdc25	sty1	sal2	phh1|spc1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Millar JB (1995)	7657164	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517283	2542632	2541055	279086	277570	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC409.07c	cdc25	wis1	sal2	smf2|spc2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Millar JB (1995)	7657164	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517284	2540746	2543379	277269	279801	SPBC211.03c	SPAC821.09	gea1	eng1	SPBC211.03c	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Eckler AM (2013)	23457617	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517285	2543387	3361342	279809	280418	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC16D10.07c	mcl1	sir2	slr3	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Natsume T (2008)	18493607	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517286	2543387	2540821	279809	277339	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC800.03	mcl1	clr3	slr3	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Natsume T (2008)	18493607	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517287	2543387	2539658	279809	276213	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPBC1105.17	mcl1	cnp1	slr3	sim2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Natsume T (2008)	18493607	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517288	2543387	2539242	279809	275812	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPCC290.04	mcl1	ams2	slr3	SPCC4F11.01	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Natsume T (2008)	18493607	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517289	2540856	2541603	277373	278100	SPBC4F6.12	SPAC1F5.04c	pxl1	cdc12	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Pinar M (2008)	18256290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517290	2539312	2543676	275879	280090	SPCC777.14	SPAC9.03c	prp4	brr2	-	spp41	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Schmidt H (1999)	10545451	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517291	2539205	2539379	275775	275945	SPCC4B3.15	SPCC188.02	mid1	par1	dmf1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Le Goff X (2001)	11707284	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517292	2539149	2541519	275721	278020	SPCC1739.11c	SPAC227.07c	cdc11	pab1	-	ret1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Le Goff X (2001)	11707284	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517293	2543040	2540025	279475	276569	SPAC31G5.13	SPBC16G5.01	rpn11	rpn12	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	SPBC342.07|mts3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Penney M (1998)	9727008	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517294	2543367	3361134	279789	280210	SPAC3H1.10	SPCC737.09c	pcs2	hmt1	SPAC3H1.10|pcs	SPCC74.08c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Preveral S (2009)	19054771	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517295	2539155	2539219	275727	275789	SPCC1020.02	SPCC1795.01c	spc7	mad3	-	SPCC895.02	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Shepperd LA (2012)	22521786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517296	2539155	2542489	275727	278948	SPCC1020.02	SPAC589.08c	spc7	dam1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Shepperd LA (2012)	22521786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517297	2539155	2540361	275727	276890	SPCC1020.02	SPBC2F12.13	spc7	klp5	-	sot1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Shepperd LA (2012)	22521786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517298	2539155	2541193	275727	277707	SPCC1020.02	SPBC776.02c	spc7	dis2	-	bws1|sds1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Shepperd LA (2012)	22521786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517299	2539155	2539505	275727	276068	SPCC1020.02	SPCC736.14	spc7	dis1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Shepperd LA (2012)	22521786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517300	2540948	3361487	277464	280563	SPBC365.13c	SPAC1805.17	hba1	crm1	caf1	SPAC1B2.01|caf2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Benko Z (1998)	9894913	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517301	3361487	2540948	280563	277464	SPAC1805.17	SPBC365.13c	crm1	hba1	SPAC1B2.01|caf2	caf1	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Benko Z (1998)	9894913	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517302	2540027	2539869	276571	276415	SPBC1734.14c	SPBC11B10.09	suc1	cdc2	p13	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Draetta G (1987)	3297353	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517303	2540027	2540027	276571	276571	SPBC1734.14c	SPBC1734.14c	suc1	suc1	p13	p13	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Draetta G (1987)	3297353	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517304	2543297	2543338	279722	279761	SPAC823.16c	SPAC458.06	atg1802	atg1803	mug179|atg18b|atg18	SPAC458.06|atg18|atg18c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Mukaiyama H (2009)	19778961	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517305	3361214	2540283	280290	276814	SPBC31E1.01c	SPBC1A4.02c	atg2	leu1	SPBC660.18c|mug36	SPBC1E8.07c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Mukaiyama H (2009)	19778961	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517306	2539461	2540283	276024	276814	SPCC63.08c	SPBC1A4.02c	atg1	leu1	cvt10|ppk36	SPBC1E8.07c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Mukaiyama H (2009)	19778961	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517307	2542368	2540283	278832	276814	SPAC1783.06c	SPBC1A4.02c	atg12	leu1	apg12	SPBC1E8.07c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Mukaiyama H (2009)	19778961	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517308	2543425	2540283	279845	276814	SPAC4F10.07c	SPBC1A4.02c	atg13	leu1	apg13|mug78	SPBC1E8.07c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Mukaiyama H (2009)	19778961	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517309	2541029	2543585	277544	280000	SPBC409.10	SPAC9.09	ade7	met26	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Fujita Y (2006)	16436428	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517310	2539829	2541619	276378	278116	SPBC17G9.04c	SPAC27F1.09c	nup85	prp10	ptr5	sap155|SF3b155	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Watanabe N (2012)	22240020	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517311	2539829	2540707	276378	277230	SPBC17G9.04c	SPBC19C2.01	nup85	cdc28	ptr5	prp8|SPBC21B10.01c|SPBC874.01	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Watanabe N (2012)	22240020	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517312	2539829	2540565	276378	277092	SPBC17G9.04c	SPBC1D7.04	nup85	mlo3	ptr5	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Watanabe N (2012)	22240020	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517313	2539829	2541682	276378	278178	SPBC17G9.04c	SPAC15F9.02	nup85	seh1	ptr5	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Watanabe N (2012)	22240020	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517314	2541652	2541161	278148	277676	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC725.11c	sty1	php2	phh1|spc1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Takuma K (2013)	23832353	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517315	2542540	2542674	278997	279127	SPAC19D5.06c	SPAC26A3.12c	din1	dhp1	rai1	rat1	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Xiang S (2009)	19194460	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517316	2541115	2542660	277630	279113	SPBC660.07	SPAC328.03	ntp1	tps1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Franco A (2005)	15965643	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517317	2541055	2542988	277570	279426	SPBC409.07c	SPAC1006.09	wis1	win1	smf2|spc2	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Morigasaki S (2013)	23389634	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517318	2541055	2542873	277570	279318	SPBC409.07c	SPAC9G1.02	wis1	wis4	smf2|spc2	wak1|wik1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Morigasaki S (2013)	23389634	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517319	2540580	2541755	277106	278249	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC2F7.11	ran1	nrd1	pat1	msa2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Tsukahara K (1998)	9671458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517320	2541055	2541755	277570	278249	SPBC409.07c	SPAC2F7.11	wis1	nrd1	smf2|spc2	msa2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tsukahara K (1998)	9671458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517321	2540580	2543481	277106	279901	SPBC19C2.05	SPAPB2B4.03	ran1	cig2	pat1	cyc17	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Tsukahara K (1998)	9671458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517322	2540580	2539781	277106	276331	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC106.10	ran1	pka1	pat1	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Tsukahara K (1998)	9671458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517323	2540499	2541957	277027	278444	SPBC25D12.02c	SPAC23C11.16	dnt1	plo1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang Y (2012)	22809626	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517324	2542337	2539513	278803	276075	SPAC16E8.09	SPCC645.05c	scd1	myo2	ral1	rng5	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kitayama C (1997)	9182664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517325	2542123	2540580	278599	277106	SPAC18G6.15	SPBC19C2.05	mal3	ran1	-	pat1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yamashita A (2013)	23755176	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517326	2539933	2541159	276477	277674	SPBC17D11.06	SPBC685.09	spp2	orc2	pri2	orp2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Uchiyama M (2004)	15314153	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517327	2541159	2539135	277674	275707	SPBC685.09	SPCC553.09c	orc2	spb70	orp2	pol12	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Uchiyama M (2004)	15314153	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517328	2540337	2541914	276866	278404	SPBC28F2.11	SPAC2F3.03c	hmo1	rpa49	SPBC28F2.11	rpa51	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Albert B (2013)	24021628	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517329	2541914	2540337	278404	276866	SPAC2F3.03c	SPBC28F2.11	rpa49	hmo1	rpa51	SPBC28F2.11	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Albert B (2013)	24021628	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517330	2538770	2542492	275353	278951	SPCC1753.02c	SPAC1B9.02c	git3	sck1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mudge DK (2014)	24297439	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517331	2539505	2541193	276068	277707	SPCC736.14	SPBC776.02c	dis1	dis2	-	bws1|sds1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Nabeshima K (1995)	7628693	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517332	2543520	2540178	279938	276711	SPAC607.10	SPBC17D1.07c	spo3	npg1	-	SPBC17D1.07c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Takaine M (2014)	25146394	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517333	2539892	2540178	276438	276711	SPBC1347.03	SPBC17D1.07c	meu14	npg1	-	SPBC17D1.07c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Takaine M (2014)	25146394	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517334	2542988	2541055	279426	277570	SPAC1006.09	SPBC409.07c	win1	wis1	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	smf2|spc2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Samejima I (1998)	9693384	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517335	2541055	2542873	277570	279318	SPBC409.07c	SPAC9G1.02	wis1	wis4	smf2|spc2	wak1|wik1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Samejima I (1998)	9693384	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517336	2541055	2542988	277570	279426	SPBC409.07c	SPAC1006.09	wis1	win1	smf2|spc2	SPAC1250.06c|SPAPJ730.01	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Samejima I (1998)	9693384	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517337	2541089	2543537	277604	279954	SPBC646.09c	SPAC4D7.05	int6	sum1	yin6	tif34	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Crane R (2000)	11071922	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517338	2541089	2542140	277604	278616	SPBC646.09c	SPAC1783.07c	int6	pap1	yin6	caf3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Crane R (2000)	11071922	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517339	2541869	2542079	278359	278556	SPAC22F3.13	SPAP7G5.04c	tsc1	lys1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Matsumoto S (2002)	12136010	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517340	2541869	2539698	278359	276251	SPAC22F3.13	SPBC11B10.02c	tsc1	his3	-	pi009|SPACTOKYO_453.27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Matsumoto S (2002)	12136010	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517341	2540919	2541627	277435	278123	SPBC543.07	SPAC1F5.08c	pek1	yam8	mkk1|skh1	ehs1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Deng L (2006)	16928959	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517342	2540919	2542812	277435	279259	SPBC543.07	SPAC6F6.01	pek1	cch1	mkk1|skh1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Deng L (2006)	16928959	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517343	2540919	2539920	277435	276464	SPBC543.07	SPBC119.08	pek1	pmk1	mkk1|skh1	spm1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Deng L (2006)	16928959	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517344	2538902	2542738	275480	279188	SPCC13B11.01	SPAC25B8.19c	adh1	loz1	adh	SPAC25B8.19c|SPAC683.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Corkins ME (2013)	24003116	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517345	2539352	2542414	275918	278878	SPCC188.07	SPAC6F6.16c	ccq1	tpz1	-	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Jun HI (2013)	24013504	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517346	2543336	2542129	279759	278605	SPAC688.11	SPAC17G8.12	end4	sec3	sla2	SPAC17G8.12	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jourdain I (2012)	22891673	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517347	2540283	2541195	276814	277709	SPBC1A4.02c	SPBC839.17c	leu1	fkh1	SPBC1E8.07c	SPBC24E9.17c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Weisman R (2005)	15466417	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517348	2539864	2540936	276411	277452	SPBC16A3.15c	SPBC800.05c	nda2	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Toda T (1984)	6327053	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517349	2541117	2540768	277632	277288	SPBC646.13	SPBC1D7.02c	sds23	scr1	moc1|psp1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Saitoh S (2015)	25411338	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517350	2541268	2543682	277782	280096	SPBP19A11.03c	SPAC637.10c	mts4	rpn10	rpn1	pus1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Boehringer J (2012)	22906049	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517351	2540025	2543682	276569	280096	SPBC16G5.01	SPAC637.10c	rpn12	rpn10	SPBC342.07|mts3	pus1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Boehringer J (2012)	22906049	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517352	2542029	2541603	278511	278100	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC1F5.04c	rad24	cdc12	anr5|sam4	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mishra M (2005)	16085489	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517353	2542029	2543526	278511	279944	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC4A8.15c	rad24	cdc3	anr5|sam4	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mishra M (2005)	16085489	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517354	2542029	2540737	278511	277260	SPAC8E11.02c	SPBC19G7.05c	rad24	bgs1	anr5|sam4	cps1|drc1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mishra M (2005)	16085489	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517355	2542029	2542162	278511	278638	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC6F6.08c	rad24	cdc16	anr5|sam4	bub2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Mishra M (2005)	16085489	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517356	2540751	2540673	277273	277198	SPBC20F10.10	SPBC1D7.03	psl1	mug80	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chen BR (2013)	23874875	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517357	2540673	2540751	277198	277273	SPBC1D7.03	SPBC20F10.10	mug80	psl1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chen BR (2013)	23874875	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517358	2541900	2539703	278390	276256	SPAC23H4.17c	SPBC16G5.15c	srb10	fkh2	cdk8|prk1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Szilagyi Z (2012)	22451489	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517359	2539703	2542632	276256	279086	SPBC16G5.15c	SPAC24H6.05	fkh2	cdc25	-	sal2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Szilagyi Z (2012)	22451489	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517360	2539703	2539123	276256	275695	SPBC16G5.15c	SPCC18B5.03	fkh2	wee1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Szilagyi Z (2012)	22451489	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517361	2541667	2540494	278163	277022	SPAC29E6.04	SPBC409.04c	nnf1	mis12	SPAC30.08	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kobayashi Y (2007)	17352737	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517362	2539645	2542482	276200	278942	SPBC146.07	SPAP8A3.06	prp2	uaf2	mis11|ods1|uaf1	SPAP8A3.06|ods2	Two-hybrid	physical	Wentz-Hunter K (1996)	8657565	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517363	2542285	2542337	278753	278803	SPAC17H9.09c	SPAC16E8.09	ras1	scd1	ste5	ral1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Hakuno F (1996)	9133664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517364	2542285	2542137	278753	278613	SPAC17H9.09c	SPAC1D4.13	ras1	byr1	ste5	ste1|ste3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Hakuno F (1996)	9133664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517365	2542285	2541726	278753	278220	SPAC17H9.09c	SPAC22H10.07	ras1	scd2	ste5	ral3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Hakuno F (1996)	9133664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517366	2542285	2540612	278753	277138	SPAC17H9.09c	SPBC1D7.05	ras1	byr2	ste5	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Hakuno F (1996)	9133664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517367	2541187	5802702	277701	857840	SPBC776.14	SPCC1235.15	plh1	dga1	-	SPCC548.01	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Zhang Q (2003)	12963726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517368	2542829	2542285	279276	278753	SPAC13D6.02c	SPAC17H9.09c	byr3	ras1	-	ste5	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Xu HP (1992)	1515675	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517369	2542829	2540612	279276	277138	SPAC13D6.02c	SPBC1D7.05	byr3	byr2	-	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Xu HP (1992)	1515675	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517370	2541612	2540024	278109	276568	SPAC1F7.04	SPBP4H10.04	rho1	ppb1	-	SPBC1346.01c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Viana RA (2013)	23934882	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517371	2541612	2540019	278109	276563	SPAC1F7.04	SPBC1685.01	rho1	pmp1	-	dsp1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Viana RA (2013)	23934882	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517372	2541612	2540019	278109	276563	SPAC1F7.04	SPBC1685.01	rho1	pmp1	-	dsp1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Viana RA (2013)	23934882	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517373	2541612	2540024	278109	276568	SPAC1F7.04	SPBP4H10.04	rho1	ppb1	-	SPBC1346.01c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Viana RA (2013)	23934882	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517374	2541612	3361511	278109	280587	SPAC1F7.04	SPAC23C4.08	rho1	rho3	-	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Viana RA (2013)	23934882	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517375	2541612	2542773	278109	279222	SPAC1F7.04	SPAC16.01	rho1	rho2	-	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Viana RA (2013)	23934882	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517376	2541612	2542677	278109	279130	SPAC1F7.04	SPAC26F1.10c	rho1	pyp1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Viana RA (2013)	23934882	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517377	2541612	2541652	278109	278148	SPAC1F7.04	SPAC24B11.06c	rho1	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Viana RA (2013)	23934882	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517378	2541612	2538786	278109	275367	SPAC1F7.04	SPCC830.06	rho1	cnb1	-	SPCC830.06	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Viana RA (2013)	23934882	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517379	3361532	2539640	280608	276195	SPAC1D4.11c	SPBC32F12.09	lkh1	rum1	kic1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yu EY (2013)	23376070	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517380	2542632	2539869	279086	276415	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC11B10.09	cdc25	cdc2	sal2	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Booher R (1986)	3796591	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517381	2542632	2539123	279086	275695	SPAC24H6.05	SPCC18B5.03	cdc25	wee1	sal2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Booher R (1986)	3796591	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517382	2543546	2543545	279963	279962	SPAC4H3.14c	SPAC926.03	rng8	rlc1	SPAC4H3.14c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang N (2014)	24798735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517383	2543546	2539513	279963	276075	SPAC4H3.14c	SPCC645.05c	rng8	myo2	SPAC4H3.14c	rng5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang N (2014)	24798735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517384	2541283	2543545	277796	279962	SPBP8B7.02	SPAC926.03	rng9	rlc1	SPBP8B7.02	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang N (2014)	24798735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517385	2541283	2539513	277796	276075	SPBP8B7.02	SPCC645.05c	rng9	myo2	SPBP8B7.02	rng5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang N (2014)	24798735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517386	2540560	2539513	277087	276075	SPBC2D10.14c	SPCC645.05c	myo51	myo2	-	rng5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang N (2014)	24798735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517387	2540560	2543545	277087	279962	SPBC2D10.14c	SPAC926.03	myo51	rlc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wang N (2014)	24798735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517388	2541975	2541699	278460	278195	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAP8A3.08	cdc15	cdc4	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fankhauser C (1995)	7634333	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517389	2539360	2543576	275926	279991	SPCC613.04c	SPAC4A8.05c	rng3	myp2	-	myo3	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2009)	19098712	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517390	2539360	2539659	275926	276214	SPCC613.04c	SPBC146.13c	rng3	myo1	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2009)	19098712	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517391	2539360	2540560	275926	277087	SPCC613.04c	SPBC2D10.14c	rng3	myo51	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2009)	19098712	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517392	2539360	2538846	275926	275427	SPCC613.04c	SPCC1919.10c	rng3	myo52	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2009)	19098712	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517393	2539360	2539513	275926	276075	SPCC613.04c	SPCC645.05c	rng3	myo2	-	rng5	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Amorim MJ (2009)	19098712	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517394	2539442	2540720	276005	277243	SPCC5E4.04	SPBC216.07c	cut1	tor2	ptr4	SPBC646.01c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Yanagida M (2011)	22084378	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517395	2539641	2540473	276196	277001	SPBC14C8.01c	SPBC30D10.10c	cut2	tor1	SPBC1815.02c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yanagida M (2011)	22084378	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517396	2540580	2542029	277106	278511	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC8E11.02c	ran1	rad24	pat1	anr5|sam4	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kuromori T (2000)	10996255	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517397	2541652	2540329	278148	276859	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC29B5.01	sty1	atf1	phh1|spc1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Degols G (1997)	9154834	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517398	2539087	2540645	275659	277170	SPCC1259.13	SPBC21B10.05c	chk1	pop3	rad27	wat1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Verma SK (2014)	24586893	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517399	2540645	2539645	277170	276200	SPBC21B10.05c	SPBC146.07	pop3	prp2	wat1	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Two-hybrid	physical	Verma SK (2014)	24586893	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517400	2540580	2542103	277106	278579	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC31G5.11	ran1	pac2	pat1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kunitomo H (1995)	8536311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517401	2542103	2540258	278579	276789	SPAC31G5.11	SPBC32C12.02	pac2	ste11	-	aff1|stex	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kunitomo H (1995)	8536311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517402	2539207	2542103	275777	278579	SPCC285.09c	SPAC31G5.11	cgs2	pac2	pde1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kunitomo H (1995)	8536311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517403	2539781	2542103	276331	278579	SPBC106.10	SPAC31G5.11	pka1	pac2	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kunitomo H (1995)	8536311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517404	2542103	2539781	278579	276331	SPAC31G5.11	SPBC106.10	pac2	pka1	-	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kunitomo H (1995)	8536311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517405	2542727	2542558	279177	279014	SPAC26A3.02	SPAC1952.07	myh1	rad1	myh	rad19	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Jansson K (2008)	18675827	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517406	3361532	2542151	280608	278627	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC17A2.09c	lkh1	csx1	kic1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kang WH (2007)	17612531	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517407	2542151	3361532	278627	280608	SPAC17A2.09c	SPAC1D4.11c	csx1	lkh1	-	kic1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kang WH (2007)	17612531	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517408	2542151	2541652	278627	278148	SPAC17A2.09c	SPAC24B11.06c	csx1	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kang WH (2007)	17612531	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517409	2541324	2539164	277836	275735	SPBP23A10.09	SPCC16A11.17	psf1	mcm4	-	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	PCA	physical	Akman G (2009)	19228417	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517410	2539164	2539164	275735	275735	SPCC16A11.17	SPCC16A11.17	mcm4	mcm4	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	PCA	physical	Akman G (2009)	19228417	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517411	2540880	2541193	277397	277707	SPBC582.03	SPBC776.02c	cdc13	dis2	-	bws1|sds1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Sanchez-Perez I (2005)	16079915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517412	2540880	2542489	277397	278948	SPBC582.03	SPAC589.08c	cdc13	dam1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Sanchez-Perez I (2005)	16079915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517413	2540880	2542189	277397	278664	SPBC582.03	SPAC17A5.09c	cdc13	glc9	-	SPAC17A5.09c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Sanchez-Perez I (2005)	16079915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517414	2542123	2542489	278599	278948	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC589.08c	mal3	dam1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Sanchez-Perez I (2005)	16079915	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517415	14218023	2540690	4254385	277215	SPAC9G1.15c	SPBC428.20c	mzt1	alp6	tam4	SPBC902.01c	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Dhani DK (2013)	24006493	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517416	14218023	2540690	4254385	277215	SPAC9G1.15c	SPBC428.20c	mzt1	alp6	tam4	SPBC902.01c	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Dhani DK (2013)	24006493	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517417	2540690	14218023	277215	4254385	SPBC428.20c	SPAC9G1.15c	alp6	mzt1	SPBC902.01c	tam4	Two-hybrid	physical	Dhani DK (2013)	24006493	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517418	2540024	2540919	276568	277435	SPBP4H10.04	SPBC543.07	ppb1	pek1	SPBC1346.01c	mkk1|skh1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Sugiura R (1999)	10365961	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517419	2540024	2540919	276568	277435	SPBP4H10.04	SPBC543.07	ppb1	pek1	SPBC1346.01c	mkk1|skh1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sugiura R (1999)	10365961	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517420	2540024	2540919	276568	277435	SPBP4H10.04	SPBC543.07	ppb1	pek1	SPBC1346.01c	mkk1|skh1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sugiura R (1999)	10365961	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517421	2539703	2542632	276256	279086	SPBC16G5.15c	SPAC24H6.05	fkh2	cdc25	-	sal2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Garg A (2015)	25908789	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517422	2540866	2539703	277383	276256	SPBC4C3.12	SPBC16G5.15c	sep1	fkh2	SPBC4C3.05	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Garg A (2015)	25908789	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517423	2540580	2539781	277106	276331	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC106.10	ran1	pka1	pat1	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Maeda T (1994)	8144551	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517424	2541849	2542622	278340	279076	SPAC20G8.01	SPAC18B11.07c	cdc17	rhp6	SPAC57A10.13c	sng1|ubc2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Rowley R (1999)	10224243	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517425	2542239	2540735	278711	277258	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC83.03c	chp1	tas3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ishida M (2012)	22727667	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517426	2540735	2542239	277258	278711	SPBC83.03c	SPAC18G6.02c	tas3	chp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ishida M (2012)	22727667	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517427	2540719	2539209	277242	275779	SPBC216.05	SPCC23B6.03c	rad3	tel1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rozenzhak S (2010)	20661445	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517428	2542285	2541530	278753	278030	SPAC17H9.09c	SPAC57A10.10c	ras1	sla1	ste5	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tanabe K (2003)	14665462	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517429	2541652	2541530	278148	278030	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC57A10.10c	sty1	sla1	phh1|spc1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tanabe K (2003)	14665462	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517430	2542137	2541530	278613	278030	SPAC1D4.13	SPAC57A10.10c	byr1	sla1	ste1|ste3	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tanabe K (2003)	14665462	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517431	2540612	2541530	277138	278030	SPBC1D7.05	SPAC57A10.10c	byr2	sla1	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tanabe K (2003)	14665462	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517432	2540070	2541530	276608	278030	SPBC119.04	SPAC57A10.10c	mei3	sla1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tanabe K (2003)	14665462	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517433	2542474	2541530	278934	278030	SPAC31G5.09c	SPAC57A10.10c	spk1	sla1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tanabe K (2003)	14665462	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517434	2540027	2540027	276571	276571	SPBC1734.14c	SPBC1734.14c	suc1	suc1	p13	p13	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Bourne Y (1995)	7479758	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517435	2541818	2542358	278309	278823	SPAC11G7.02	SPAC1782.09c	pub1	clp1	-	flp1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Esteban V (2008)	18418059	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517436	2539620	2541624	276178	278120	SPBC1861.01c	SPAC23C11.15	cnp3	pst2	SPBC56F2.13	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tanaka K (2009)	19758558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517437	2540915	2539620	277431	276178	SPBC800.13	SPBC1861.01c	cnp20	cnp3	SPBC800.13	SPBC56F2.13	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tanaka K (2009)	19758558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517438	2540234	2540433	276766	276961	SPBC336.12c	SPBC2D10.06	cdc10	rep1	-	rec16	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Sugiyama A (1994)	8168486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517439	2540234	2541153	276766	277668	SPBC336.12c	SPBC725.16	cdc10	res1	-	sct1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Sugiyama A (1994)	8168486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517440	2541153	2540433	277668	276961	SPBC725.16	SPBC2D10.06	res1	rep1	sct1	rec16	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Sugiyama A (1994)	8168486	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517441	2539864	2540582	276411	277108	SPBC16A3.15c	SPBC26H8.07c	nda2	nda3	-	alp12|ben1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Umesono K (1983)	6887245	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517442	2540297	2540853	276828	277370	SPBC24C6.08c	SPBC428.16c	bhd1	rhb1	bhd	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	van Slegtenhorst M (2007)	17556368	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517443	2542873	2541055	279318	277570	SPAC9G1.02	SPBC409.07c	wis4	wis1	wak1|wik1	smf2|spc2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Shieh JC (1998)	9718372	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517444	2541071	2543086	277586	279519	SPBC582.05c	SPAC30D11.10	brc1	rad52	-	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Williams JS (2010)	20094029	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517445	2541071	2542226	277586	278699	SPBC582.05c	SPAC19G12.06c	brc1	hta2	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Williams JS (2010)	20094029	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517446	2541071	2539499	277586	276062	SPBC582.05c	SPCC622.08c	brc1	hta1	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Williams JS (2010)	20094029	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517447	2541071	2540992	277586	277508	SPBC582.05c	SPBC342.05	brc1	crb2	-	rhp9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Williams JS (2010)	20094029	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517448	2539997	2540099	276541	276637	SPBC1604.14c	SPBC16H5.11c	shk1	skb1	orb2|pak1	rmt5	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gilbreth M (1998)	9843966	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517449	2539027	2539869	275600	276415	SPCC1322.08	SPBC11B10.09	srk1	cdc2	mkp1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Lopez-Aviles S (2005)	15629716	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517450	2539027	2541443	275600	277948	SPCC1322.08	SPAC11E3.09	srk1	pyp3	mkp1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Lopez-Aviles S (2005)	15629716	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517451	2539027	2539123	275600	275695	SPCC1322.08	SPCC18B5.03	srk1	wee1	mkp1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lopez-Aviles S (2005)	15629716	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517452	2539027	2542632	275600	279086	SPCC1322.08	SPAC24H6.05	srk1	cdc25	mkp1	sal2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Lopez-Aviles S (2005)	15629716	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517453	2542029	2542632	278511	279086	SPAC8E11.02c	SPAC24H6.05	rad24	cdc25	anr5|sam4	sal2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lopez-Aviles S (2005)	15629716	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517454	2540470	2540234	276998	276766	SPBC29A10.15	SPBC336.12c	orc1	cdc10	cdc30|orp1|rid1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Synnes M (2002)	12186947	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517455	2540554	2539723	277081	276276	SPBC29A10.03c	SPBC1347.01c	pcf1	rev1	SPBC365.19c|rlf2	SPBC215.16c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Pietrobon V (2014)	25313826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517456	2542071	2540020	278548	276564	SPAC26H5.03	SPBC16D10.09	pcf2	pcn1	cac2	pcn	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Pietrobon V (2014)	25313826	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517457	5802740	14218174	857878	4254536	SPNCRNA.103	SPAC19G12.17	sme2	erh1	SPNCRNA.1341	new10|iss6	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yamashita A (2013)	23980030	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517458	2543597	2541193	280012	277707	SPAC4A8.12c	SPBC776.02c	sds22	dis2	-	bws1|sds1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Stone EM (1993)	15335873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517459	2543597	2539179	280012	275750	SPAC4A8.12c	SPCC31H12.05c	sds22	sds21	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Stone EM (1993)	15335873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517460	2541193	2543597	277707	280012	SPBC776.02c	SPAC4A8.12c	dis2	sds22	bws1|sds1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Stone EM (1993)	15335873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517461	2542812	2540919	279259	277435	SPAC6F6.01	SPBC543.07	cch1	pek1	-	mkk1|skh1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ma Y (2011)	21811607	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517462	2540024	2539071	276568	275643	SPBP4H10.04	SPCC1322.03	ppb1	trp1322	SPBC1346.01c	SPCC1322.03	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ma Y (2011)	21811607	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517463	2543324	2539377	279747	275943	SPAPJ696.01c	SPCC825.03c	vps17	psy1	-	sso1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Koga T (2004)	15189449	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517464	2539552	2539377	276113	275943	SPCPJ732.01	SPCC825.03c	vps5	psy1	-	sso1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Koga T (2004)	15189449	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517465	2543444	2539377	279864	275943	SPAC458.05	SPCC825.03c	pik3	psy1	vps34	sso1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Koga T (2004)	15189449	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517466	2542181	2542084	278656	278561	SPAC29E6.05c	SPAC7D4.07c	mxr1	trx1	SPAC29E6.05c|MsrA|SPAC30.09c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Garcia-Santamarina S (2013)	24118096	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517467	2540772	2542084	277292	278561	SPBC216.04c	SPAC7D4.07c	mxr2	trx1	SPBC216.04c|MsrB	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Garcia-Santamarina S (2013)	24118096	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517476	2540580	2543286	277106	279711	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC56F8.16	ran1	esc1	pat1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Benton BK (1993)	8381348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517477	2543339	2540853	279762	277370	SPAC630.13c	SPBC428.16c	tsc2	rhb1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	van Slegtenhorst M (2005)	16115814	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517478	2541652	2541756	278148	278250	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC8C9.14	sty1	prr1	phh1|spc1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakamichi N (2003)	12723602	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517479	2540831	2542513	277349	278971	SPBC428.02c	SPAC1952.05	eca39	gcn5	SPBC582.12c	kat2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Takahashi H (2012)	22992726	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517480	2542474	2541765	278934	278259	SPAC31G5.09c	SPAC11E3.06	spk1	map1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yabana N (1996)	8668157	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517481	2542474	2540258	278934	276789	SPAC31G5.09c	SPBC32C12.02	spk1	ste11	-	aff1|stex	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yabana N (1996)	8668157	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517482	2542873	2541055	279318	277570	SPAC9G1.02	SPBC409.07c	wis4	wis1	wak1|wik1	smf2|spc2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Shiozaki K (1998)	9614178	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517483	2540996	2540439	277512	276967	SPBC3H7.01	SPBC31F10.06c	spo14	sar1	SPBP16F5.01c|stl1	psr1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nakamura-Kubo M (2003)	12631727	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517484	2543336	2541193	279759	277707	SPAC688.11	SPBC776.02c	end4	dis2	sla2	bws1|sds1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Alvarez-Tabares I (2007)	17895368	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517485	2539642	2541193	276197	277707	SPBC1706.01	SPBC776.02c	tea4	dis2	wsh3	bws1|sds1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Alvarez-Tabares I (2007)	17895368	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517486	2542367	2542737	278831	279187	SPAC1783.03	SPAC25B8.14	fta2	mal2	sma2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kerres A (2006)	16855021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517487	2542737	2542367	279187	278831	SPAC25B8.14	SPAC1783.03	mal2	fta2	-	sma2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kerres A (2006)	16855021	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517488	2539645	2539783	276200	276333	SPBC146.07	SPBC1289.02c	prp2	uap2	mis11|ods1|uaf1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	McKinney R (1997)	9371883	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517489	2542482	2539783	278942	276333	SPAP8A3.06	SPBC1289.02c	uaf2	uap2	SPAP8A3.06|ods2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	McKinney R (1997)	9371883	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517490	2543633	2543237	280047	279665	SPAC3H8.05c	SPAC6B12.02c	mms1	mus7	-	mms22	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dovey CL (2009)	19819763	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517491	2543633	2538959	280047	275533	SPAC3H8.05c	SPCC18B5.11c	mms1	cds1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dovey CL (2009)	19819763	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517492	2543633	2543086	280047	279519	SPAC3H8.05c	SPAC30D11.10	mms1	rad52	-	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Dovey CL (2009)	19819763	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517493	2543633	2543580	280047	279995	SPAC3H8.05c	SPAC644.14c	mms1	rad51	-	rhp51	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dovey CL (2009)	19819763	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517494	2543633	2541620	280047	278117	SPAC3H8.05c	SPAC2G11.12	mms1	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dovey CL (2009)	19819763	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517495	2543237	2543633	279665	280047	SPAC6B12.02c	SPAC3H8.05c	mus7	mms1	mms22	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Dovey CL (2009)	19819763	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517496	2543001	2541519	279439	278020	SPAC1006.08	SPAC227.07c	etd1	pab1	-	ret1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Jimenez J (1994)	7845361	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517497	2539786	2541016	276336	277531	SPBC12C2.13c	SPBC3E7.06c	fnx1	fnx2	SPBC21D10.04c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Chardwiriyapreecha S (2008)	18503766	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517498	2543372	2539997	279794	276541	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC1604.14c	ase1	shk1	-	orb2|pak1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Loo TH (2008)	19029336	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517499	3361342	2538868	280418	275448	SPBC16D10.07c	SPCC132.02	sir2	hst2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Durand-Dubief M (2007)	17446861	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517500	2538868	2542366	275448	278830	SPCC132.02	SPAC1783.04c	hst2	hst4	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Durand-Dubief M (2007)	17446861	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517501	2540617	2542492	277143	278951	SPBC21C3.20c	SPAC1B9.02c	git1	sck1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Jin M (1995)	7498728	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517502	2539974	2542492	276518	278951	SPBC32H8.07	SPAC1B9.02c	git5	sck1	gpb1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Jin M (1995)	7498728	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517503	2540962	2542492	277478	278951	SPBC36.12c	SPAC1B9.02c	git7	sck1	SPBC713.01c	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Jin M (1995)	7498728	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517504	2541720	2542492	278214	278951	SPAC23H3.13c	SPAC1B9.02c	gpa2	sck1	git8	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Jin M (1995)	7498728	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517505	2543539	2542492	279956	278951	SPAC926.04c	SPAC1B9.02c	hsp90	sck1	git10|swo1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Jin M (1995)	7498728	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517506	2539649	2542293	276204	278761	SPBC12D12.04c	SPAC17G8.14c	pck2	pck1	pkc1|sts6	SPAC22H10.01c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Toda T (1996)	8943330	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517507	2539218	2540234	275788	276766	SPCC16C4.03	SPBC336.12c	pin1	cdc10	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Huang HK (2001)	11707530	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517508	2543027	2539997	279463	276541	SPAC110.03	SPBC1604.14c	cdc42	shk1	-	orb2|pak1	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Ottilie S (1995)	8846783	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517509	3361562	2542358	280638	278823	SPAC11E3.03	SPAC1782.09c	csm1	clp1	pcs1	flp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Gregan J (2007)	17627824	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517510	2541652	2541055	278148	277570	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC409.07c	sty1	wis1	phh1|spc1	smf2|spc2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Gaits F (1998)	9585506	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517511	2539703	2540258	276256	276789	SPBC16G5.15c	SPBC32C12.02	fkh2	ste11	-	aff1|stex	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Shimada M (2008)	18059475	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517512	2543481	2539703	279901	276256	SPAPB2B4.03	SPBC16G5.15c	cig2	fkh2	cyc17	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Shimada M (2008)	18059475	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517513	2539741	2542632	276293	279086	SPBC16A3.05c	SPAC24H6.05	rae1	cdc25	cut21	sal2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Brown JA (1995)	7706287	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517514	2539781	2542492	276331	278951	SPBC106.10	SPAC1B9.02c	pka1	sck1	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Franco A (2000)	11004189	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517515	2539869	2539123	276415	275695	SPBC11B10.09	SPCC18B5.03	cdc2	wee1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Russell P (1987)	3032459	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517516	2542655	2540223	279109	276756	SPAC3A11.14c	SPBC32F12.04	pkl1	gtb1	SPAC3H5.03c|klp1	tug1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Rodriguez AS (2008)	18418055	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517517	2540601	9407016	277127	1028379	SPBC29A3.14c	SPNCRNA.214	trt1	ter1	-	SPNG585	Co-purification	physical	Webb CJ (2008)	18157149	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517518	2540492	9407016	277020	1028379	SPBC2D10.13	SPNCRNA.214	est1	ter1	-	SPNG585	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Webb CJ (2008)	18157149	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517519	2542615	2542890	279069	279334	SPAC19G12.01c	SPAC13G6.14	cut20	aps1	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	SPAC24B11.03	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yamashita YM (1999)	10526233	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517520	2541220	2539242	277734	275812	SPBC8D2.04	SPCC290.04	hht2	ams2	h3.2	SPCC4F11.01	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Lim KK (2015)	26369364	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517521	2542403	2540055	278867	276593	SPAC19A8.05c	SPBC1734.08	sst4	hse1	vps27	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Onishi M (2007)	17951524	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517522	5802740	2542069	857878	278546	SPNCRNA.103	SPAC27D7.13c	sme2	ssm4	SPNCRNA.1341	SPAC637.01c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yamashita A (1997)	9167972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517523	3361476	3361511	280552	280587	SPAC16A10.04	SPAC23C4.08	rho4	rho3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Perez P (2015)	25724972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517524	3361511	2539407	280587	275972	SPAC23C4.08	SPCC970.09	rho3	sec8	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Perez P (2015)	25724972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517525	3361511	2540127	280587	276664	SPAC23C4.08	SPBC106.20	rho3	exo70	-	SPBC582.02	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Perez P (2015)	25724972	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517526	2539928	2539348	276472	275914	SPBC1604.08c	SPCC18B5.07c	imp1	nup61	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517527	2539928	2538801	276472	275382	SPBC1604.08c	SPCC285.13c	imp1	nup60	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517528	2539928	2542254	276472	278724	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC30D11.04c	imp1	nup124	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517529	2539928	2540694	276472	277218	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC19C7.10	imp1	bqt4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517530	2539928	2542496	276472	278955	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC1B1.03c	imp1	kap95	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517531	2539928	2539928	276472	276472	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC1604.08c	imp1	imp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517532	2539928	2539487	276472	276050	SPBC1604.08c	SPCC895.05	imp1	for3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517533	2539928	2538902	276472	275480	SPBC1604.08c	SPCC13B11.01	imp1	adh1	-	adh	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517534	2539928	2542875	276472	279320	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC13G7.02c	imp1	ssa1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517535	2539928	2540016	276472	276560	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC1773.09c	imp1	mug184	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517536	2539928	2543051	276472	279486	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC1071.08	imp1	rpp203	-	rla6|rpp2-3|rpa2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517537	2539928	2538822	276472	275403	SPBC1604.08c	SPCC1840.02c	imp1	bgs4	-	cwg1|orb11|pbr1|sph1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517538	2539928	2541305	276472	277817	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC9B6.08	imp1	clc1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517539	2539928	2540053	276472	276591	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC106.06	imp1	cct4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517540	2539928	2539432	276472	275995	SPBC1604.08c	SPCC965.05c	imp1	thp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517541	2539928	2539426	276472	275991	SPBC1604.08c	SPCC962.03c	imp1	cut15	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517542	2539928	2541579	276472	278076	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC26F1.03	imp1	pda1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517543	2539928	2541460	276472	277962	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC1F5.02	imp1	pdi1	-	SPAC1F5.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517544	2539928	2538689	276472	275274	SPBC1604.08c	SPCC1795.11	imp1	sum3	-	ded1|moc2|slh3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517545	2539928	2543021	276472	279457	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC11E3.15	imp1	rpl22	-	SPAP8A3.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517546	2539928	2542046	276472	278527	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC2F3.06c	imp1	kap104	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517547	2539928	2539938	276472	276482	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC17D11.05	imp1	tif32	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517548	2539928	2539295	276472	275863	SPBC1604.08c	SPCC417.08	imp1	tef3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517549	2539928	2540300	276472	276831	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC2G2.08	imp1	ade9	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517550	2539928	2541652	276472	278148	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC24B11.06c	imp1	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517551	2539928	2539509	276472	276071	SPBC1604.08c	SPCC825.01	imp1	SPCC825.01	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517552	2539928	2542504	276472	278962	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC589.06c	imp1	SPAC589.06c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517553	2539928	2539253	276472	275823	SPBC1604.08c	SPCC1827.03c	imp1	SPCC1827.03c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517554	2539928	2542138	276472	278614	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC589.10c	imp1	SPAC589.10c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517555	2539928	3361454	276472	280530	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC1D4.14	imp1	tho2	-	SPAC22F3.14c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517556	2539928	2539189	276472	275760	SPBC1604.08c	SPCC1682.16	imp1	rpt4	-	SPCC306.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517557	2539928	2540299	276472	276830	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC3B9.13c	imp1	rpp102	-	rpp1-2|rpa103	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517558	2539928	2541191	276472	277705	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC839.04	imp1	rpl803	-	rpk5-b|rpkD4|rpl8-3|SPBC24E9.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517559	2539928	2540950	276472	277466	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC365.03c	imp1	rpl2101	-	rpl21|rpl21-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517560	2539928	2542748	276472	279198	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC15A10.09c	imp1	pun1	-	SPAC15A10.09c|sur7	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517561	2539928	2540680	276472	277205	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC26H8.05c	imp1	pph3	-	SPBC26H8.05c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517562	2539928	2541296	276472	277808	SPBC1604.08c	SPBP8B7.06	imp1	rpp201	-	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517563	2539928	2540870	276472	277387	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC56F2.02	imp1	rpl1901	-	rpl19-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517564	2539928	2541170	276472	277684	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC776.15c	imp1	kgd2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517565	2539928	2541087	276472	277602	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC646.10c	imp1	SPBC646.10c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517566	2539928	2540530	276472	277058	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC405.05	imp1	atg16	-	SPBC405.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517567	2539928	2538797	276472	275378	SPBC1604.08c	SPCC794.07	imp1	lat1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517568	2539928	2540273	276472	276804	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC30D10.13c	imp1	pdb1	-	agg1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517569	2539928	2539598	276472	276156	SPBC1604.08c	SPCP1E11.09c	imp1	rpp103	-	rpp1-3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517570	2539928	2543475	276472	279895	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC890.08	imp1	rpl31	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517571	2539928	2543642	276472	280056	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC3H5.12c	imp1	rpl501	-	rpl5|rpl5-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517572	2539928	2539743	276472	276295	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC16A3.08c	imp1	oga1	-	SPBC16A3.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517573	2539928	2540324	276472	276854	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC29A3.16	imp1	rrs1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517574	2539928	2540743	276472	277266	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC215.06c	imp1	SPBC215.06c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517575	2539928	2540326	276472	276856	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC2G5.06c	imp1	hmt2	-	cad1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517576	2539928	2540873	276472	277390	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC4C3.05c	imp1	nuc1	-	rpa1|rpa190	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517577	2539928	2541654	276472	278150	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC22G7.05	imp1	kri1	-	SPAC22G7.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517578	2539928	2540201	276472	276734	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC13A2.04c	imp1	ptr2	-	SPBC13A2.04c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517579	2539928	2539538	276472	276100	SPBC1604.08c	SPCC364.06	imp1	nap1	-	nap11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517580	2539928	2539222	276472	275792	SPBC1604.08c	SPCC1183.08c	imp1	rpl101	-	rpl1-1|rpl10a-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517581	2539928	2542907	276472	279351	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC1420.03	imp1	rpn501	-	rpn5|rpn5-a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517582	2539928	2538912	276472	275489	SPBC1604.08c	SPCC1682.10	imp1	rpn8	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517583	2539928	2540977	276472	277493	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC3E7.02c	imp1	hsp16	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517584	2539928	2542744	276472	279194	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC1565.08	imp1	cdc48	-	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517585	2539928	2540469	276472	276997	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC26H8.08c	imp1	grn1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517586	2539928	2540794	276472	277313	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC582.07c	imp1	rpn7	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517587	2539928	3361462	276472	280538	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC3A11.12c	imp1	rpt5	-	pam2|tbp1|SPAC3H5.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517588	2539928	2541927	276472	278415	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC222.12c	imp1	atp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517589	2539928	2543236	276472	279664	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC8C9.04	imp1	SPAC8C9.04	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517590	2539928	2539195	276472	275766	SPBC1604.08c	SPCC18B5.01c	imp1	bfr1	-	SPCPJ732.04c|hba2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517591	2539928	2541009	276472	277524	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC428.04	imp1	apq12	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517592	2539928	2539396	276472	275961	SPBC1604.08c	SPCP25A2.03	imp1	SPCP25A2.03	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517593	2539928	2541126	276472	277641	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC651.01c	imp1	nog1	-	SPBC725.18c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517594	2539928	2543155	276472	279586	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC30D11.03	imp1	ddx27	-	drs1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517595	2539928	2541668	276472	278164	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC1F7.02c	imp1	has1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517596	2539928	2543142	276472	279574	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC12G12.02	imp1	efg1	-	SPAC12G12.02|SPAC630.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517597	2539928	2540726	276472	277249	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC216.01c	imp1	psy2	-	SPBC216.01c|SPBC713.13c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517598	2539928	2540368	276472	276897	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC36.05c	imp1	clr6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517599	2539928	2540659	276472	277184	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC19F5.05c	imp1	ppp1	-	SPBC25D12.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517600	2539928	2541914	276472	278404	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC2F3.03c	imp1	rpa49	-	rpa51	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517601	2539928	2543153	276472	279585	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC821.05	imp1	SPAC821.05	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517602	2539928	5802967	276472	858105	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC20G4.08	imp1	pdc1	-	SPAC20G4.08|SPAC4F10.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517603	2539928	2542463	276472	278924	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC1834.03c	imp1	hhf1	-	h4.1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517604	2539928	3361491	276472	280567	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC1805.08	imp1	dlc1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517605	2539928	2543139	276472	279571	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC12G12.03	imp1	cip2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517606	2539928	2541274	276472	277788	SPBC1604.08c	SPBP8B7.20c	imp1	nop2	-	SPBP8B7.20c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517607	2539928	2540960	276472	277476	SPBC1604.08c	SPBC3D6.02	imp1	but2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517608	2539928	2541348	276472	277859	SPBC1604.08c	SPBP4H10.15	imp1	SPBP4H10.15	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517609	2539928	2542253	276472	278723	SPBC1604.08c	SPAC17H9.04c	imp1	SPAC17H9.04c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517610	2538912	2539928	275489	276472	SPCC1682.10	SPBC1604.08c	rpn8	imp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lucena R (2015)	25963819	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517611	2539582	2540694	276141	277218	SPCC594.07c	SPBC19C7.10	bqt3	bqt4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Chikashige Y (2009)	19948484	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517612	2540115	2540694	276652	277218	SPBC1778.02	SPBC19C7.10	rap1	bqt4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Chikashige Y (2009)	19948484	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517613	2542071	2539568	278548	276128	SPAC26H5.03	SPCC663.05c	pcf2	cia1	cac2	asf1	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Malay AD (2008)	18334479	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517614	2542558	2538959	279014	275533	SPAC1952.07	SPCC18B5.11c	rad1	cds1	rad19	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Murakami H (1995)	7723827	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517615	2538959	2541695	275533	278191	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC1F7.05	cds1	cdc22	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Murakami H (1995)	7723827	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517616	2538959	2543629	275533	280043	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC3H5.06c	cds1	pol1	-	polA|swi7	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Murakami H (1995)	7723827	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517617	2541867	2542492	278357	278951	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC1B9.02c	sck2	sck1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Chen BR (2009)	19409973	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517618	3361134	3361134	280210	280210	SPCC737.09c	SPCC737.09c	hmt1	hmt1	SPCC74.08c	SPCC74.08c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mendoza-Cozatl DG (2010)	20937798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517619	2540601	9407016	277127	1028379	SPBC29A3.14c	SPNCRNA.214	trt1	ter1	-	SPNG585	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Leonardi J (2008)	18157152	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517620	2540492	2540601	277020	277127	SPBC2D10.13	SPBC29A3.14c	est1	trt1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Leonardi J (2008)	18157152	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517621	2542079	2542118	278556	278594	SPAP7G5.04c	SPAC17C9.02c	lys1	lys7	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Guo S (2004)	15546125	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517622	3361533	2542548	280609	279005	SPAC222.15	SPAC13A11.03	meu13	mcp7	SPAC821.01	mug32|mnd1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Saito TT (2004)	15210864	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517623	2542548	2541643	279005	278139	SPAC13A11.03	SPAC14C4.13	mcp7	rad17	mug32|mnd1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Saito TT (2004)	15210864	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517624	2542548	2542150	279005	278626	SPAC13A11.03	SPAC17A5.11	mcp7	rec12	mug32|mnd1	spo11	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Saito TT (2004)	15210864	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517625	2539560	2541652	276121	278148	SPCC736.08	SPAC24B11.06c	cbf11	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Prevorovsky M (2015)	26366556	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517626	2539560	2539781	276121	276331	SPCC736.08	SPBC106.10	cbf11	pka1	-	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Prevorovsky M (2015)	26366556	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517627	2539560	2539781	276121	276331	SPCC736.08	SPBC106.10	cbf11	pka1	-	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Prevorovsky M (2015)	26366556	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517628	2539560	2541652	276121	278148	SPCC736.08	SPAC24B11.06c	cbf11	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Prevorovsky M (2015)	26366556	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517629	2540582	2543164	277108	279595	SPBC26H8.07c	SPAC3G6.06c	nda3	rad2	alp12|ben1	fen1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ekwall K (1996)	8937982	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517630	2540582	2540825	277108	277343	SPBC26H8.07c	SPBC428.08c	nda3	clr4	alp12|ben1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ekwall K (1996)	8937982	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517631	2540582	2539050	277108	275623	SPBC26H8.07c	SPCC11E10.08	nda3	rik1	alp12|ben1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ekwall K (1996)	8937982	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517632	2540582	2541633	277108	278129	SPBC26H8.07c	SPAC664.01c	nda3	swi6	alp12|ben1	SPAC824.10c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ekwall K (1996)	8937982	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517633	2539369	2542615	275935	279069	SPCC16A11.05c	SPAC19G12.01c	dim1	cut20	-	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Berry LD (1999)	10082519	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517634	2540241	2542632	276773	279086	SPBC32H8.11	SPAC24H6.05	mei4	cdc25	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	sal2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Murakami-Tonami Y (2007)	17804800	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517635	2540426	2541071	276954	277586	SPBC23E6.07c	SPBC582.05c	rfc1	brc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mejia-Ramirez E (2015)	26368543	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517636	2540426	2540719	276954	277242	SPBC23E6.07c	SPBC216.05	rfc1	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mejia-Ramirez E (2015)	26368543	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517637	2540719	2541746	277242	278240	SPBC216.05	SPAC20G4.04c	rad3	hus1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Mejia-Ramirez E (2015)	26368543	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517638	2540719	2539209	277242	275779	SPBC216.05	SPCC23B6.03c	rad3	tel1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Mejia-Ramirez E (2015)	26368543	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517639	2540992	2541071	277508	277586	SPBC342.05	SPBC582.05c	crb2	brc1	rhp9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mejia-Ramirez E (2015)	26368543	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517640	2538798	2543678	275379	280092	SPCC1322.01	SPAC637.11	rpm1	rpm2	SPCC23B6.06|par1	pah1|suv3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Hoffmann B (2008)	18304578	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517641	2541633	2539481	278129	276044	SPAC664.01c	SPCC622.16c	swi6	epe1	SPAC824.10c	kdm2	Two-hybrid	physical	Trewick SC (2007)	17948055	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517642	2541446	2539481	277951	276044	SPAC23G3.01	SPCC622.16c	rpb2	epe1	SPAC521.06	kdm2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Trewick SC (2007)	17948055	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517643	2538930	2539481	275506	276044	SPCC188.13c	SPCC622.16c	dcr1	epe1	SPCC584.10c	kdm2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Trewick SC (2007)	17948055	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517644	2539781	2541867	276331	278357	SPBC106.10	SPAC22E12.14c	pka1	sck2	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nakashima A (2012)	22976295	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517645	2539781	2542492	276331	278951	SPBC106.10	SPAC1B9.02c	pka1	sck1	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nakashima A (2012)	22976295	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517646	2538768	2542586	275351	279041	SPCC330.05c	SPAC1399.03	ura4	fur4	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nishino K (2015)	26536126	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517647	2538768	2541818	275351	278309	SPCC330.05c	SPAC11G7.02	ura4	pub1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nishino K (2015)	26536126	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517648	2541633	2541592	278129	278089	SPAC664.01c	SPAC6F12.15c	swi6	cut9	SPAC824.10c	dre1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dubey RN (2009)	19117951	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517649	2541633	2539639	278129	276194	SPAC664.01c	SPBC106.09	swi6	cut4	SPAC824.10c	apc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dubey RN (2009)	19117951	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517650	2539639	2541633	276194	278129	SPBC106.09	SPAC664.01c	cut4	swi6	apc1	SPAC824.10c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dubey RN (2009)	19117951	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517651	2541592	2541633	278089	278129	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC664.01c	cut9	swi6	dre1	SPAC824.10c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Dubey RN (2009)	19117951	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517652	2539658	2540915	276213	277431	SPBC1105.17	SPBC800.13	cnp1	cnp20	sim2	SPBC800.13	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Folco HD (2015)	25619765	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517653	2540363	2541860	276892	278350	SPBC2F12.09c	SPAC22F3.02	atf21	atf31	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Mata J (2007)	17927811	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517654	2539505	2541633	276068	278129	SPCC736.14	SPAC664.01c	dis1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	George AA (2015)	26510788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517655	2539505	2540821	276068	277339	SPCC736.14	SPBC800.03	dis1	clr3	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	George AA (2015)	26510788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517656	2539505	2540368	276068	276897	SPCC736.14	SPBC36.05c	dis1	clr6	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	George AA (2015)	26510788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517657	2539505	2541710	276068	278205	SPCC736.14	SPAC343.11c	dis1	msc1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	George AA (2015)	26510788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517658	2539505	2543643	276068	280057	SPCC736.14	SPAC3G9.07c	dis1	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	George AA (2015)	26510788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517659	2539505	2540589	276068	277115	SPCC736.14	SPBC20F10.06	dis1	mad2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	George AA (2015)	26510788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517660	2539505	3361342	276068	280418	SPCC736.14	SPBC16D10.07c	dis1	sir2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	George AA (2015)	26510788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517661	2539497	2541710	276060	278205	SPCC895.07	SPAC343.11c	alp14	msc1	mtc1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	George AA (2015)	26510788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517662	2540329	2540258	276859	276789	SPBC29B5.01	SPBC32C12.02	atf1	ste11	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	aff1|stex	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ohmiya R (2000)	11129048	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517663	2541756	2540258	278250	276789	SPAC8C9.14	SPBC32C12.02	prr1	ste11	-	aff1|stex	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ohmiya R (2000)	11129048	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517664	2540473	2542200	277001	278675	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC19D5.01	tor1	pyp2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Hartmuth S (2009)	19417002	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517665	2539703	2539703	276256	276256	SPBC16G5.15c	SPBC16G5.15c	fkh2	fkh2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Buck V (2004)	15509866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517666	2541815	2540606	278306	277132	SPAC22A12.15c	SPBC428.03c	bip1	pho4	bip	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Jannatipour M (1998)	9860839	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517667	2539971	2543290	276515	279715	SPBC1105.04c	SPAC9E9.10c	cbp1	cbh1	abp1	cbh	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Aguilar-Arnal L (2008)	18354497	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517668	2539971	2539728	276515	276280	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC14F5.12c	cbp1	cbh2	abp1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Aguilar-Arnal L (2008)	18354497	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517669	2542703	2542703	279156	279156	SPAC26H5.06	SPAC26H5.06	pot1	pot1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Martin V (2007)	17715303	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517670	9406926	2541052	1028289	277567	SPCC1393.14	SPBC409.12c	ten1	stn1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Martin V (2007)	17715303	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517671	2541052	9406926	277567	1028289	SPBC409.12c	SPCC1393.14	stn1	ten1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Martin V (2007)	17715303	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517672	2540283	2539461	276814	276024	SPBC1A4.02c	SPCC63.08c	leu1	atg1	SPBC1E8.07c	cvt10|ppk36	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kohda TA (2007)	17295836	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517673	2540283	2543425	276814	279845	SPBC1A4.02c	SPAC4F10.07c	leu1	atg13	SPBC1E8.07c	apg13|mug78	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kohda TA (2007)	17295836	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517674	2540283	2541386	276814	277897	SPBC1A4.02c	SPBP8B7.24c	leu1	atg8	SPBC1E8.07c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kohda TA (2007)	17295836	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517675	2538726	2539461	275310	276024	SPCC777.09c	SPCC63.08c	arg1	atg1	-	cvt10|ppk36	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kohda TA (2007)	17295836	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517676	2538726	2543425	275310	279845	SPCC777.09c	SPAC4F10.07c	arg1	atg13	-	apg13|mug78	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kohda TA (2007)	17295836	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517677	2538726	2541386	275310	277897	SPCC777.09c	SPBP8B7.24c	arg1	atg8	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kohda TA (2007)	17295836	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517678	2538768	2539461	275351	276024	SPCC330.05c	SPCC63.08c	ura4	atg1	-	cvt10|ppk36	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kohda TA (2007)	17295836	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517679	2538768	2543425	275351	279845	SPCC330.05c	SPAC4F10.07c	ura4	atg13	-	apg13|mug78	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kohda TA (2007)	17295836	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517680	2538768	2541386	275351	277897	SPCC330.05c	SPBP8B7.24c	ura4	atg8	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kohda TA (2007)	17295836	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517681	2541500	2539461	278002	276024	SPAC227.18	SPCC63.08c	lys3	atg1	SPAC2F7.01	cvt10|ppk36	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kohda TA (2007)	17295836	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517682	2541500	2543425	278002	279845	SPAC227.18	SPAC4F10.07c	lys3	atg13	SPAC2F7.01	apg13|mug78	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kohda TA (2007)	17295836	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517683	2541500	2541386	278002	277897	SPAC227.18	SPBP8B7.24c	lys3	atg8	SPAC2F7.01	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kohda TA (2007)	17295836	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517684	2543097	2539461	279529	276024	SPAC4A8.04	SPCC63.08c	isp6	atg1	prb1	cvt10|ppk36	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kohda TA (2007)	17295836	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517685	2543097	2543425	279529	279845	SPAC4A8.04	SPAC4F10.07c	isp6	atg13	prb1	apg13|mug78	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kohda TA (2007)	17295836	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517686	2543097	2541386	279529	277897	SPAC4A8.04	SPBP8B7.24c	isp6	atg8	prb1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kohda TA (2007)	17295836	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517687	2540283	2543097	276814	279529	SPBC1A4.02c	SPAC4A8.04	leu1	isp6	SPBC1E8.07c	prb1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kohda TA (2007)	17295836	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517688	2540992	2543281	277508	279708	SPBC342.05	SPAC23C4.18c	crb2	rad4	rhp9	cut5|dpb11|dre3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mochida S (2004)	14739927	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517689	2542109	3361266	278585	280342	SPAC1687.16c	SPBC27B12.03c	erg31	erg32	erg3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Iwaki T (2008)	18310029	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517690	2539539	2541633	276101	278129	SPCC576.10c	SPAC664.01c	rpt3	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kitagawa T (2014)	24710126	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517697	2539399	2540719	275964	277242	SPCC550.13	SPBC216.05	dfp1	rad3	him1|rad35|dbf4	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Marchetti MA (2006)	16371652	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517698	2539399	2538959	275964	275533	SPCC550.13	SPCC18B5.11c	dfp1	cds1	him1|rad35|dbf4	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Marchetti MA (2006)	16371652	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517699	2540555	2540471	277082	276999	SPBP16F5.02	SPBC19F8.07	mcs2	mcs6	-	cdk7|crk1|mop1	Two-hybrid	physical	Buck V (1995)	8557037	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517700	2540471	2540555	276999	277082	SPBC19F8.07	SPBP16F5.02	mcs6	mcs2	cdk7|crk1|mop1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Buck V (1995)	8557037	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517701	2538829	2539945	275410	276489	SPCC306.09c	SPBC119.05c	cap1	SPBC119.05c	cap	csh3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yamamoto T (2015)	26542710	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517702	2542395	2539047	278859	275620	SPAC1805.05	SPCC1223.06	cki3	tea1	-	alp8	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Koyano T (2015)	26525038	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517703	2541193	2539642	277707	276197	SPBC776.02c	SPBC1706.01	dis2	tea4	bws1|sds1	wsh3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Koyano T (2015)	26525038	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517704	2542732	2540320	279182	276850	SPAC25G10.07c	SPBC3D6.04c	cut7	mad1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Akera T (2015)	26258632	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517705	2542732	2542732	279182	279182	SPAC25G10.07c	SPAC25G10.07c	cut7	cut7	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Akera T (2015)	26258632	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517706	2542732	2542732	279182	279182	SPAC25G10.07c	SPAC25G10.07c	cut7	cut7	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Akera T (2015)	26258632	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517707	2542732	2542732	279182	279182	SPAC25G10.07c	SPAC25G10.07c	cut7	cut7	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Akera T (2015)	26258632	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517708	2540320	2540589	276850	277115	SPBC3D6.04c	SPBC20F10.06	mad1	mad2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Akera T (2015)	26258632	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517709	2540320	2542732	276850	279182	SPBC3D6.04c	SPAC25G10.07c	mad1	cut7	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Akera T (2015)	26258632	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517710	2538736	2542732	275320	279182	SPCC1322.12c	SPAC25G10.07c	bub1	cut7	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Akera T (2015)	26258632	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517711	2541856	2542732	278347	279182	SPAC23H3.08c	SPAC25G10.07c	bub3	cut7	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Akera T (2015)	26258632	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517712	2540060	2542732	276598	279182	SPBC106.01	SPAC25G10.07c	mph1	cut7	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Akera T (2015)	26258632	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517713	2540320	2542732	276850	279182	SPBC3D6.04c	SPAC25G10.07c	mad1	cut7	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Akera T (2015)	26258632	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517714	2542184	2542622	278659	279076	SPAC17C9.13c	SPAC18B11.07c	cut8	rhp6	-	sng1|ubc2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Takeda K (2005)	16096059	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517715	2541916	2540700	278406	277224	SPAC23C4.19	SPBC21C3.16c	spt5	spt4	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Schwer B (2009)	19460865	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517716	2540027	2540027	276571	276571	SPBC1734.14c	SPBC1734.14c	suc1	suc1	p13	p13	Co-purification	physical	Simeoni F (2001)	11434772	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517717	2542584	2540920	279039	277436	SPAC19B12.02c	SPBC342.03	gas1	gas4	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	de Medina-Redondo M (2010)	21124977	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517718	2542584	2540287	279039	276818	SPAC19B12.02c	SPBC29A10.08	gas1	gas2	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	de Medina-Redondo M (2010)	21124977	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517719	2542584	2542989	279039	279427	SPAC19B12.02c	SPAC11E3.13c	gas1	gas5	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	de Medina-Redondo M (2010)	21124977	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517720	2539105	2539817	275677	276367	SPCC1739.07	SPBC146.03c	cti1	cut3	lrp1|rrp47	smc4	Two-hybrid	physical	Chen ES (2004)	15148393	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517721	2541975	2541975	278460	278460	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC20G8.05c	cdc15	cdc15	-	-	Co-purification	physical	McDonald NA (2015)	26702831	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517722	2541975	2539513	278460	276075	SPAC20G8.05c	SPCC645.05c	cdc15	myo2	-	rng5	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	McDonald NA (2015)	26702831	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517723	2541975	2543129	278460	279561	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC4F8.13c	cdc15	rng2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	McDonald NA (2015)	26702831	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517724	2541975	2540112	278460	276649	SPAC20G8.05c	SPBC11C11.02	cdc15	imp2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	McDonald NA (2015)	26702831	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517725	2541975	2541699	278460	278195	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAP8A3.08	cdc15	cdc4	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	McDonald NA (2015)	26702831	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517726	2541975	2540737	278460	277260	SPAC20G8.05c	SPBC19G7.05c	cdc15	bgs1	-	cps1|drc1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	McDonald NA (2015)	26702831	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517727	2541975	2541603	278460	278100	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC1F5.04c	cdc15	cdc12	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	McDonald NA (2015)	26702831	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517728	2541975	2541203	278460	277717	SPAC20G8.05c	SPBC83.18c	cdc15	fic1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	McDonald NA (2015)	26702831	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517729	2541975	2541599	278460	278096	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC24B11.11c	cdc15	sid2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	McDonald NA (2015)	26702831	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517730	2541975	2540856	278460	277373	SPAC20G8.05c	SPBC4F6.12	cdc15	pxl1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	McDonald NA (2015)	26702831	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517731	2542638	2540589	279092	277115	SPAC1250.01	SPBC20F10.06	snf21	mad2	SPAC29A4.21|brg1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yamada K (2008)	19168987	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517732	2540234	2539206	276766	275776	SPBC336.12c	SPCC24B10.07	cdc10	gad8	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Cohen A (2016)	26912660	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517733	2540309	2540473	276839	277001	SPBC21B10.13c	SPBC30D10.10c	yox1	tor1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Cohen A (2016)	26912660	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517734	2539087	2540473	275659	277001	SPCC1259.13	SPBC30D10.10c	chk1	tor1	rad27	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Cohen A (2016)	26912660	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517735	2538744	2541620	275327	278117	SPCC306.03c	SPAC2G11.12	cnd2	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Aono N (2002)	12000964	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517736	2538744	2541849	275327	278340	SPCC306.03c	SPAC20G8.01	cnd2	cdc17	-	SPAC57A10.13c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Aono N (2002)	12000964	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517737	2538744	2541695	275327	278191	SPCC306.03c	SPAC1F7.05	cnd2	cdc22	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Aono N (2002)	12000964	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517738	2542564	2541972	279020	278457	SPAC1851.03	SPAC23C11.11	ckb1	cka1	-	orb5	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Roussou I (1994)	8264625	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517739	2541975	2540112	278460	276649	SPAC20G8.05c	SPBC11C11.02	cdc15	imp2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	McDonald NA (2016)	26776521	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517740	2540112	2540112	276649	276649	SPBC11C11.02	SPBC11C11.02	imp2	imp2	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	McDonald NA (2016)	26776521	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517741	2542622	2543629	279076	280043	SPAC18B11.07c	SPAC3H5.06c	rhp6	pol1	sng1|ubc2	polA|swi7	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Singh J (1998)	9710635	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517742	2542622	2540574	279076	277101	SPAC18B11.07c	SPBC409.03	rhp6	swi5	sng1|ubc2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Singh J (1998)	9710635	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517743	2542622	3361456	279076	280532	SPAC18B11.07c	SPAC1142.03c	rhp6	swi2	sng1|ubc2	SPAC17G6.20c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Singh J (1998)	9710635	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517744	2539658	2543449	276213	279869	SPBC1105.17	SPAPB1A10.02	cnp1	scm3	sim2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pidoux AL (2009)	19217404	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517745	2543449	2539658	279869	276213	SPAPB1A10.02	SPBC1105.17	scm3	cnp1	-	sim2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Pidoux AL (2009)	19217404	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517746	2542737	2539639	279187	276194	SPAC25B8.14	SPBC106.09	mal2	cut4	-	apc1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Jin QW (2002)	12242294	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517747	2542737	2541592	279187	278089	SPAC25B8.14	SPAC6F12.15c	mal2	cut9	-	dre1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Jin QW (2002)	12242294	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517748	2542737	2539505	279187	276068	SPAC25B8.14	SPCC736.14	mal2	dis1	-	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Jin QW (2002)	12242294	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517749	2543256	2543097	279684	279529	SPAC1006.01	SPAC4A8.04	psp3	isp6	-	prb1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Idiris A (2006)	16802154	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517750	2539838	2539838	276387	276387	SPBC1347.10	SPBC1347.10	cdc23	cdc23	mcm10	mcm10	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Schreiber A (2011)	21307936	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517751	2541957	2542880	278444	279325	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC6F12.14	plo1	cut23	-	apc8	Two-hybrid	physical	May KM (2002)	11777938	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517752	2543372	2539778	279794	276328	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC15D4.01c	ase1	klp9	-	SPBC2D10.21c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fu C (2009)	19686686	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517753	2543372	2539778	279794	276328	SPAPB1A10.09	SPBC15D4.01c	ase1	klp9	-	SPBC2D10.21c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Fu C (2009)	19686686	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517754	2540927	2541657	277443	278153	SPBC365.06	SPAP27G11.15	pmt3	slx1	smt3|ubl2	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Lian FM (2016)	26787556	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517755	2540718	2541929	277241	278417	SPBC3H7.15	SPAC23C4.12	hhp1	hhp2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sakuno T (2015)	25579976	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517756	2538852	2541688	275433	278184	SPCC4E9.01c	SPAC25G10.04c	rec11	rec10	SPCC550.16c	rec20	Two-hybrid	physical	Sakuno T (2015)	25579976	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517757	2541688	2540064	278184	276602	SPAC25G10.04c	SPBC1718.02	rec10	hop1	rec20	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Sakuno T (2015)	25579976	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517758	2542389	2541083	278853	277598	SPAC17A5.18c	SPBC577.05c	rec25	rec27	mug19	mug41	Two-hybrid	physical	Sakuno T (2015)	25579976	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517759	2542389	2542389	278853	278853	SPAC17A5.18c	SPAC17A5.18c	rec25	rec25	mug19	mug19	Two-hybrid	physical	Sakuno T (2015)	25579976	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517760	2540990	2540990	277506	277506	SPBC36B7.06c	SPBC36B7.06c	mug20	mug20	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Sakuno T (2015)	25579976	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517761	2538852	2541688	275433	278184	SPCC4E9.01c	SPAC25G10.04c	rec11	rec10	SPCC550.16c	rec20	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sakuno T (2015)	25579976	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517762	2538852	2540458	275433	276986	SPCC4E9.01c	SPBC29A10.14	rec11	rec8	SPCC550.16c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sakuno T (2015)	25579976	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517763	2540718	2538852	277241	275433	SPBC3H7.15	SPCC4E9.01c	hhp1	rec11	-	SPCC550.16c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sakuno T (2015)	25579976	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517764	2541929	2538852	278417	275433	SPAC23C4.12	SPCC4E9.01c	hhp2	rec11	-	SPCC550.16c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sakuno T (2015)	25579976	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517765	2540927	2540105	277443	276642	SPBC365.06	SPBC106.04	pmt3	ada1	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517766	2540927	2542275	277443	278744	SPBC365.06	SPAC17G8.04c	pmt3	arc5	smt3|ubl2	arc15	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517767	2540927	2539843	277443	276391	SPBC365.06	SPBC16G5.11c	pmt3	bag101	smt3|ubl2	bag1|bag1-a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517768	2540927	2543025	277443	279461	SPBC365.06	SPAC1296.02	pmt3	cox4	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517769	2540927	2539278	277443	275846	SPBC365.06	SPCC1223.07c	pmt3	drs1	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517770	2540927	2538997	277443	275571	SPBC365.06	SPCC330.09	pmt3	enp2	smt3|ubl2	SPCC330.09	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517771	2540927	2539345	277443	275911	SPBC365.06	SPCC18.18c	pmt3	fum1	smt3|ubl2	SPCC290.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517772	2540927	2540718	277443	277241	SPBC365.06	SPBC3H7.15	pmt3	hhp1	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517773	2540927	2541812	277443	278303	SPBC365.06	SPAC23G3.12c	pmt3	SPAC23G3.12c	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517774	2540927	2542496	277443	278955	SPBC365.06	SPAC1B1.03c	pmt3	kap95	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517775	2540927	2540461	277443	276989	SPBC365.06	SPBC2G2.04c	pmt3	mmf1	smt3|ubl2	pmf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517776	2540927	2540582	277443	277108	SPBC365.06	SPBC26H8.07c	pmt3	nda3	smt3|ubl2	alp12|ben1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517777	2540927	2540873	277443	277390	SPBC365.06	SPBC4C3.05c	pmt3	nuc1	smt3|ubl2	rpa1|rpa190	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517778	2540927	2543042	277443	279477	SPBC365.06	SPAP8A3.09c	pmt3	paa1	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517779	2540927	2541143	277443	277658	SPBC365.06	SPBC725.08	pmt3	pir2	smt3|ubl2	SPBC725.08|ars2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517780	2540927	2539662	277443	276217	SPBC365.06	SPBC1711.12	pmt3	SPBC1711.12	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517781	2540927	2540978	277443	277494	SPBC365.06	SPBC342.02	pmt3	qrs1	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517782	2540927	2542821	277443	279268	SPBC365.06	SPAC144.12	pmt3	SPAC144.12	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517783	2540927	3361407	277443	280483	SPBC365.06	SPAPB17E12.05	pmt3	rpl3703	smt3|ubl2	rpl37	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517784	2540927	2541491	277443	277993	SPBC365.06	SPAC2C4.16c	pmt3	rps801	smt3|ubl2	rps8|rps8-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517785	2540927	2541117	277443	277632	SPBC365.06	SPBC646.13	pmt3	sds23	smt3|ubl2	moc1|psp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517786	2540927	2543413	277443	279835	SPBC365.06	SPAC4F8.12c	pmt3	spp42	smt3|ubl2	cwf6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517787	2540927	2541872	277443	278362	SPBC365.06	SPAC23H4.10c	pmt3	thi4	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517788	2540927	2540396	277443	276924	SPBC365.06	SPBC31F10.12	pmt3	tma20	smt3|ubl2	SPBC31F10.12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517789	2540927	2541028	277443	277543	SPBC365.06	SPBC577.08c	pmt3	txl1	smt3|ubl2	trx3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517790	2540927	2538808	277443	275389	SPBC365.06	SPCPB16A4.05c	pmt3	SPCPB16A4.05c	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517791	2540927	2538788	277443	275369	SPBC365.06	SPCC1322.14c	pmt3	vtc4	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517792	2540927	2542450	277443	278911	SPBC365.06	SPAC13C5.04	pmt3	SPAC13C5.04	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517793	2540927	2542273	277443	278742	SPBC365.06	SPAC17H9.13c	pmt3	SPAC17H9.13c	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517794	2540927	3361412	277443	280488	SPBC365.06	SPAC25G10.01	pmt3	SPAC25G10.01	smt3|ubl2	SPAC2C4.18	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517795	2540927	2543333	277443	279756	SPBC365.06	SPAC694.02	pmt3	SPAC694.02	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517796	2540927	3361337	277443	280413	SPBC365.06	SPBC1105.01	pmt3	rrp12	smt3|ubl2	SPBPB7E8.03	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517797	2540927	2540710	277443	277233	SPBC365.06	SPBC4.03c	pmt3	SPBC4.03c	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517798	2540927	2541375	277443	277886	SPBC365.06	SPBP8B7.31	pmt3	SPBP8B7.31	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517799	2540927	2538920	277443	275497	SPBC365.06	SPCC1840.05c	pmt3	SPCC1840.05c	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517800	2540927	2538708	277443	275292	SPBC365.06	SPCC594.01	pmt3	SPCC594.01	smt3|ubl2	SPCC736.16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517801	2540927	2539015	277443	275588	SPBC365.06	SPCC1183.02	pmt3	SPCC1183.02	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517802	2540927	2541140	277443	277655	SPBC365.06	SPBC713.07c	pmt3	SPBC713.07c	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517803	2540927	2539816	277443	276366	SPBC365.06	SPBC12C2.04	pmt3	SPBC12C2.04	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517804	2540927	2542534	277443	278992	SPBC365.06	SPAC6G10.09	pmt3	SPAC6G10.09	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517805	2540927	2542721	277443	279172	SPBC365.06	SPAC29E6.06c	pmt3	SPAC29E6.06c	smt3|ubl2	SPAC30.10c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517806	2540927	2542435	277443	278897	SPBC365.06	SPAC1805.16c	pmt3	SPAC1805.16c	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517807	2540927	2542902	277443	279346	SPBC365.06	SPAC144.05	pmt3	SPAC144.05	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517808	2540927	2543267	277443	279695	SPBC365.06	SPAC1002.12c	pmt3	SPAC1002.12c	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517809	2540927	2540865	277443	277382	SPBC365.06	SPBC4B4.07c	pmt3	usp102	smt3|ubl2	mud1|U1A	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517810	2540927	2539967	277443	276511	SPBC365.06	SPBC16H5.03c	pmt3	fub2	smt3|ubl2	uba2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517811	2540927	2542660	277443	279113	SPBC365.06	SPAC328.03	pmt3	tps1	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517812	2540927	2539938	277443	276482	SPBC365.06	SPBC17D11.05	pmt3	tif32	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517813	2540927	2541355	277443	277866	SPBC365.06	SPBP8B7.19	pmt3	spt16	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517814	2540927	2541942	277443	278429	SPBC365.06	SPAC222.09	pmt3	seb1	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517815	2540927	2539539	277443	276101	SPBC365.06	SPCC576.10c	pmt3	rpt3	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517816	2540927	2542789	277443	279238	SPBC365.06	SPAC15E1.03	pmt3	rpl42	smt3|ubl2	rpl36a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517817	2540927	3361377	277443	280453	SPBC365.06	SPAPB17E12.13	pmt3	rpl1802	smt3|ubl2	rpl18-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517818	2540927	2541051	277443	277566	SPBC365.06	SPBC3E7.08c	pmt3	rad13	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517819	2540927	2540057	277443	276595	SPBC365.06	SPBC16H5.10c	pmt3	prp43	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517820	2540927	2541579	277443	278076	SPBC365.06	SPAC26F1.03	pmt3	pda1	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517821	2540927	2539808	277443	276358	SPBC365.06	SPBC17D11.01	pmt3	nep1	smt3|ubl2	SPBC20F10.11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517822	2540927	2542254	277443	278724	SPBC365.06	SPAC30D11.04c	pmt3	nup124	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517823	2540927	2540894	277443	277410	SPBC365.06	SPBC530.04	pmt3	mod5	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517824	2540927	2539730	277443	276282	SPBC365.06	SPBC1861.08c	pmt3	lea1	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517825	2540927	2542196	277443	278671	SPBC365.06	SPAC30D11.13	pmt3	hus5	smt3|ubl2	ubc9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517826	2540927	2540472	277443	277000	SPBC365.06	SPBC2G2.12	pmt3	hrs1	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517827	2540927	2539059	277443	275632	SPBC365.06	SPCC737.06c	pmt3	SPCC737.06c	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517828	2540927	2541154	277443	277669	SPBC365.06	SPBC3E7.01	pmt3	fab1	smt3|ubl2	SPBC6B1.11c|ste12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517829	2540927	2540432	277443	276960	SPBC365.06	SPBC25H2.05	pmt3	egd2	smt3|ubl2	nac1|ucp15	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517830	2540927	2539048	277443	275621	SPBC365.06	SPCC1223.08c	pmt3	dfr1	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517831	2540927	2541293	277443	277805	SPBC365.06	SPBC9B6.10	pmt3	cdc37	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517832	2540927	2540899	277443	277415	SPBC365.06	SPBC4F6.18c	pmt3	arf1	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517833	2540927	2540139	277443	276676	SPBC365.06	SPBC1773.06c	pmt3	adh8	smt3|ubl2	SPBC1773.06c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517834	2540927	2542287	277443	278755	SPBC365.06	SPAC6F6.10c	pmt3	arc2	smt3|ubl2	arc34	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517835	2540927	2543233	277443	279661	SPBC365.06	SPAC630.03	pmt3	arp3	smt3|ubl2	act2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517836	2540927	2542564	277443	279020	SPBC365.06	SPAC1851.03	pmt3	ckb1	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517837	2540927	2540499	277443	277027	SPBC365.06	SPBC25D12.02c	pmt3	dnt1	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517838	2540927	2540868	277443	277385	SPBC365.06	SPBC4C3.07	pmt3	SPBC4C3.07	smt3|ubl2	csn6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517839	2540927	2540031	277443	276574	SPBC365.06	SPBC1198.14c	pmt3	fbp1	smt3|ubl2	SPBC660.04c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517840	2540927	2541727	277443	278221	SPBC365.06	SPAC22H10.12c	pmt3	gdi1	smt3|ubl2	sec19	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517841	2540927	2539489	277443	276052	SPBC365.06	SPCC550.06c	pmt3	hsp10	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517842	2540927	2541345	277443	277856	SPBC365.06	SPBP35G2.07	pmt3	ilv1	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517843	2540927	2542670	277443	279123	SPBC365.06	SPAC26F1.13c	pmt3	lrs1	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517844	2540927	2542841	277443	279287	SPBC365.06	SPAC13F5.05	pmt3	SPAC13F5.05	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517845	2540927	2539821	277443	276371	SPBC365.06	SPBC1711.10c	pmt3	npl4	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517846	2540927	2539239	277443	275809	SPBC365.06	SPCC1020.10	pmt3	oca2	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517847	2540927	2539201	277443	275772	SPBC365.06	SPCC188.09c	pmt3	pfl4	smt3|ubl2	SPCC188.09c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517848	2540927	2539992	277443	276536	SPBC365.06	SPBC1289.04c	pmt3	pob1	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517849	2540927	2540431	277443	276959	SPBC365.06	SPBC19C7.06	pmt3	prs1	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517850	2540927	2543606	277443	280021	SPBC365.06	SPAC4C5.04	pmt3	rad31	smt3|ubl2	uba4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517851	2540927	2543453	277443	279873	SPBC365.06	SPAC3G9.03	pmt3	rpl2301	smt3|ubl2	rpl23-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517852	2540927	2543217	277443	279645	SPBC365.06	SPAC644.15	pmt3	rpp101	smt3|ubl2	rpp1-1|rpa1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517853	2540927	2540464	277443	276992	SPBC365.06	SPBC23E6.02	pmt3	rrp2	smt3|ubl2	SPBC23E6.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517854	2540927	2542651	277443	279105	SPBC365.06	SPAC24C9.12c	pmt3	SPAC24C9.12c	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517855	2540927	2539180	277443	275751	SPBC365.06	SPCC16C4.09	pmt3	sts5	smt3|ubl2	orb4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517856	2540927	2543621	277443	280035	SPBC365.06	SPAC4A8.16c	pmt3	tif33	smt3|ubl2	SPAC823.01c|SPAC1E11.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517857	2540927	2539973	277443	276517	SPBC365.06	SPBC1539.09c	pmt3	trp1	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517858	2540927	2543043	277443	279478	SPBC365.06	SPAC3F10.13	pmt3	ucp6	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517859	2540927	2540869	277443	277386	SPBC365.06	SPBC4B4.09	pmt3	usp105	smt3|ubl2	prp39	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517860	2540927	2542401	277443	278865	SPBC365.06	SPAC1142.02c	pmt3	SPAC1142.02c	smt3|ubl2	SPAC17G6.19c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517861	2540927	2542786	277443	279235	SPBC365.06	SPAC15A10.07	pmt3	SPAC15A10.07	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517862	2540927	2542042	277443	278523	SPBC365.06	SPAC23A1.14c	pmt3	SPAC23A1.14c	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517863	2540927	2541449	277443	277954	SPBC365.06	SPAC3F10.16c	pmt3	SPAC3F10.16c	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517864	2540927	2542498	277443	278957	SPBC365.06	SPACUNK4.16c	pmt3	SPACUNK4.16c	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517865	2540927	2540132	277443	276669	SPBC365.06	SPBC1778.07	pmt3	SPBC1778.07	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517866	2540927	2541329	277443	277841	SPBC365.06	SPBP23A10.11c	pmt3	SPBP23A10.11c	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517867	2540927	3361128	277443	280204	SPBC365.06	SPCC1442.04c	pmt3	SPCC1442.04c	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517868	2540927	2539454	277443	276017	SPBC365.06	SPCC622.15c	pmt3	SPCC622.15c	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517869	2540927	2538922	277443	275499	SPBC365.06	SPCC16C4.10	pmt3	SPCC16C4.10	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517870	2540927	2541366	277443	277877	SPBC365.06	SPBP4H10.12	pmt3	SPBP4H10.12	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517871	2540927	2540357	277443	276886	SPBC365.06	SPBC2F12.05c	pmt3	SPBC2F12.05c	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517872	2540927	2541759	277443	278253	SPBC365.06	SPAC5H10.03	pmt3	SPAC5H10.03	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517873	2540927	3361378	277443	280454	SPBC365.06	SPAPB17E12.14c	pmt3	SPAPB17E12.14c	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517874	2540927	2541561	277443	278060	SPBC365.06	SPAC24B11.07c	pmt3	SPAC24B11.07c	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517875	2540927	2542315	277443	278781	SPBC365.06	SPAC16C9.01c	pmt3	SPAC16C9.01c	smt3|ubl2	SPAC4G8.14c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517876	2540927	2542964	277443	279404	SPBC365.06	SPAC12G12.07c	pmt3	SPAC12G12.07c	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517877	2540927	2543009	277443	279447	SPBC365.06	SPAC10F6.06	pmt3	vip1	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517878	2540927	2539623	277443	276180	SPBC365.06	SPBC16A3.09c	pmt3	ufd1	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517879	2540927	2538842	277443	275423	SPBC365.06	SPCC1442.09	pmt3	trp3	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517880	2540927	2539126	277443	275698	SPBC365.06	SPCC1919.09	pmt3	tif6	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517881	2540927	2539579	277443	276138	SPBC365.06	SPCP31B10.05	pmt3	tdp1	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517882	2540927	2541530	277443	278030	SPBC365.06	SPAC57A10.10c	pmt3	sla1	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517883	2540927	2543597	277443	280012	SPBC365.06	SPAC4A8.12c	pmt3	sds22	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517884	2540927	2540447	277443	276975	SPBC365.06	SPBC21C3.13	pmt3	rps1901	smt3|ubl2	rps19-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517885	2540927	2543460	277443	279880	SPBC365.06	SPAC3H5.10	pmt3	rpl3202	smt3|ubl2	rpl32|rpl32-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517886	2540927	2540203	277443	276736	SPBC365.06	SPBC1604.09c	pmt3	SPBC1604.09c	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517887	2540927	2541014	277443	277529	SPBC365.06	SPBC3D6.06c	pmt3	prs5	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517888	2540927	2538758	277443	275341	SPBC365.06	SPCC1739.12	pmt3	ppe1	smt3|ubl2	esp1|ppx1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517889	2540927	2540606	277443	277132	SPBC365.06	SPBC428.03c	pmt3	pho4	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517890	2540927	2542206	277443	278681	SPBC365.06	SPAC17A2.05	pmt3	osm1	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517891	2540927	2541115	277443	277630	SPBC365.06	SPBC660.07	pmt3	ntp1	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517892	2540927	2538747	277443	275330	SPBC365.06	SPCC132.01c	pmt3	mtr1	smt3|ubl2	SPCC132.01c|SPCC1322.17c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517893	2540927	2539815	277443	276365	SPBC365.06	SPBC1105.02c	pmt3	lys4	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517894	2540927	2540344	277443	276873	SPBC365.06	SPBC30D10.03c	pmt3	SPBC30D10.03c	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517895	2540927	2540898	277443	277414	SPBC365.06	SPBC4F6.17c	pmt3	SPBC4F6.17c	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517896	2540927	2542573	277443	279029	SPBC365.06	SPAP7G5.02c	pmt3	gua2	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517897	2540927	2542898	277443	279342	SPBC365.06	SPAC6F12.13c	pmt3	fps1	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517898	2540927	2538827	277443	275408	SPBC365.06	SPCC63.14	pmt3	eis1	smt3|ubl2	SPCC63.14	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517899	2540927	2543080	277443	279513	SPBC365.06	SPAC3A11.10c	pmt3	SPAC3A11.10c	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517900	2540927	2540607	277443	277133	SPBC365.06	SPBC23G7.07c	pmt3	cms1	smt3|ubl2	SPBC23G7.07c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517901	2540927	2543406	277443	279828	SPBC365.06	SPAC9.12c	pmt3	atp12	smt3|ubl2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517902	2540927	2541767	277443	278261	SPBC365.06	SPAC6G9.07c	pmt3	arc4	smt3|ubl2	arp10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517903	2539623	2540927	276180	277443	SPBC16A3.09c	SPBC365.06	ufd1	pmt3	-	smt3|ubl2	Two-hybrid	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517904	2539623	2540927	276180	277443	SPBC16A3.09c	SPBC365.06	ufd1	pmt3	-	smt3|ubl2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517905	2539579	2542744	276138	279194	SPCP31B10.05	SPAC1565.08	tdp1	cdc48	-	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517906	2539579	2539623	276138	276180	SPCP31B10.05	SPBC16A3.09c	tdp1	ufd1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517907	2540927	2539623	277443	276180	SPBC365.06	SPBC16A3.09c	pmt3	ufd1	smt3|ubl2	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Nie M (2012)	22730331	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517908	2541319	2542558	277831	279014	SPBP4H10.06c	SPAC1952.07	cut14	rad1	smc2	rad19	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Akai Y (2011)	22645654	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517909	2541319	2541319	277831	277831	SPBP4H10.06c	SPBP4H10.06c	cut14	cut14	smc2	smc2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Akai Y (2011)	22645654	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517910	2539726	2543560	276278	279976	SPBC13E7.08c	SPAC664.03	leo1	paf1	SPBC13E7.08c	SPAC664.03	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Verrier L (2015)	25972440	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517911	2539726	2539481	276278	276044	SPBC13E7.08c	SPCC622.16c	leo1	epe1	SPBC13E7.08c	kdm2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Verrier L (2015)	25972440	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517912	2539726	2539050	276278	275623	SPBC13E7.08c	SPCC11E10.08	leo1	rik1	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Verrier L (2015)	25972440	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517913	2539726	2540825	276278	277343	SPBC13E7.08c	SPBC428.08c	leo1	clr4	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Verrier L (2015)	25972440	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517914	2539726	2541633	276278	278129	SPBC13E7.08c	SPAC664.01c	leo1	swi6	SPBC13E7.08c	SPAC824.10c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Verrier L (2015)	25972440	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517915	2539726	2541470	276278	277972	SPBC13E7.08c	SPAPYUG7.04c	leo1	rpb9	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Verrier L (2015)	25972440	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517916	2539726	2540865	276278	277382	SPBC13E7.08c	SPBC4B4.07c	leo1	usp102	SPBC13E7.08c	mud1|U1A	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Verrier L (2015)	25972440	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517917	2539726	2543387	276278	279809	SPBC13E7.08c	SPAPB1E7.02c	leo1	mcl1	SPBC13E7.08c	slr3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Verrier L (2015)	25972440	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517918	2539726	2540473	276278	277001	SPBC13E7.08c	SPBC30D10.10c	leo1	tor1	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Verrier L (2015)	25972440	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517919	2539726	2540735	276278	277258	SPBC13E7.08c	SPBC83.03c	leo1	tas3	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Verrier L (2015)	25972440	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517920	2539726	2538848	276278	275429	SPBC13E7.08c	SPCC613.12c	leo1	raf1	SPBC13E7.08c	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Verrier L (2015)	25972440	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517921	2539726	2539420	276278	275985	SPBC13E7.08c	SPCC970.07c	leo1	raf2	SPBC13E7.08c	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Verrier L (2015)	25972440	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517922	2539726	2542239	276278	278711	SPBC13E7.08c	SPAC18G6.02c	leo1	chp1	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Verrier L (2015)	25972440	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517923	2539726	2543443	276278	279863	SPBC13E7.08c	SPAC3H1.12c	leo1	snt2	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Verrier L (2015)	25972440	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517924	2539726	2542207	276278	278682	SPBC13E7.08c	SPAC17H9.10c	leo1	ddb1	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Verrier L (2015)	25972440	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517925	2539726	2539733	276278	276285	SPBC13E7.08c	SPBC16E9.12c	leo1	pab2	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Verrier L (2015)	25972440	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517926	2539726	2543254	276278	279682	SPBC13E7.08c	SPAC1006.03c	leo1	red1	SPBC13E7.08c	iss3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Verrier L (2015)	25972440	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517927	2539481	2540825	276044	277343	SPCC622.16c	SPBC428.08c	epe1	clr4	kdm2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Verrier L (2015)	25972440	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517928	2539481	2541633	276044	278129	SPCC622.16c	SPAC664.01c	epe1	swi6	kdm2	SPAC824.10c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Verrier L (2015)	25972440	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517929	2543426	2541633	279846	278129	SPAC631.02	SPAC664.01c	bdf2	swi6	SPAC631.02|nrc1	SPAC824.10c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Verrier L (2015)	25972440	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517930	2540051	2540002	276589	276546	SPBC32H8.12c	SPBC14C8.06	act1	arc1	cps8|pi012	sop2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Balasubramanian MK (1996)	8978670	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517931	2540281	2542544	276812	279001	SPBC2G2.14	SPAC18G6.10	csi1	lem2	SPBC2G2.14	heh1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tange Y (2016)	27334362	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517932	2542544	2538930	279001	275506	SPAC18G6.10	SPCC188.13c	lem2	dcr1	heh1	SPCC584.10c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Tange Y (2016)	27334362	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517933	2542544	2538940	279001	275515	SPAC18G6.10	SPCC1620.07c	lem2	lnp1	heh1	SPCC1620.07c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tange Y (2016)	27334362	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517934	2542544	2540694	279001	277218	SPAC18G6.10	SPBC19C7.10	lem2	bqt4	heh1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Tange Y (2016)	27334362	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517935	2541957	2541055	278444	277570	SPAC23C11.16	SPBC409.07c	plo1	wis1	-	smf2|spc2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Petersen J (2005)	15917811	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517936	2541957	2541652	278444	278148	SPAC23C11.16	SPAC24B11.06c	plo1	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Petersen J (2005)	15917811	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517937	2541652	2541957	278148	278444	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC23C11.16	sty1	plo1	phh1|spc1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Petersen J (2005)	15917811	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517938	2542632	2541055	279086	277570	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC409.07c	cdc25	wis1	sal2	smf2|spc2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Petersen J (2005)	15917811	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517939	2542632	2541141	279086	277656	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC649.05	cdc25	cut12	sal2	stf1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Petersen J (2005)	15917811	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517940	2541652	2541957	278148	278444	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC23C11.16	sty1	plo1	phh1|spc1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Petersen J (2005)	15917811	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517941	2541305	2541162	277817	277677	SPBC9B6.08	SPBC691.03c	clc1	apl3	-	pi033|SPACTOKYO_453.02c	Co-purification	physical	de Leon N (2016)	26749213	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517942	2538822	2541162	275403	277677	SPCC1840.02c	SPBC691.03c	bgs4	apl3	cwg1|orb11|pbr1|sph1	pi033|SPACTOKYO_453.02c	Co-purification	physical	de Leon N (2016)	26749213	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517943	2540737	2541162	277260	277677	SPBC19G7.05c	SPBC691.03c	bgs1	apl3	cps1|drc1	pi033|SPACTOKYO_453.02c	Co-purification	physical	de Leon N (2016)	26749213	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517944	2541652	2540329	278148	276859	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC29B5.01	sty1	atf1	phh1|spc1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Zuin A (2010)	20075862	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517945	2539781	2541652	276331	278148	SPBC106.10	SPAC24B11.06c	pka1	sty1	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	phh1|spc1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Zuin A (2010)	20075862	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517946	2541867	2541652	278357	278148	SPAC22E12.14c	SPAC24B11.06c	sck2	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Zuin A (2010)	20075862	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517947	2542677	2541652	279130	278148	SPAC26F1.10c	SPAC24B11.06c	pyp1	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Zuin A (2010)	20075862	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517948	2541055	2541652	277570	278148	SPBC409.07c	SPAC24B11.06c	wis1	sty1	smf2|spc2	phh1|spc1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Zuin A (2010)	20075862	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517949	2543246	2542271	279674	278740	SPAPB8E5.05	SPAC3F10.10c	mfm1	map3	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Seike T (2015)	25831518	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517950	2541875	2541079	278365	277594	SPAC22F3.06c	SPBC543.09	lon1	yta12	-	m-AAA	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Guha S (2011)	21354177	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517951	2542378	2538736	278842	275320	SPAC1805.04	SPCC1322.12c	nup132	bub1	Nup133b	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yang HJ (2015)	26483559	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517952	2542378	2540589	278842	277115	SPAC1805.04	SPBC20F10.06	nup132	mad2	Nup133b	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yang HJ (2015)	26483559	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517953	2541756	2542140	278250	278616	SPAC8C9.14	SPAC1783.07c	prr1	pap1	-	caf3	Co-purification	physical	Calvo IA (2012)	22344694	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517954	2540790	3361036	277309	280112	SPBC6B1.05c	SPCC320.13c	atg7	ark1	-	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Matsuhara H (2016)	26696398	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517955	2540790	2540589	277309	277115	SPBC6B1.05c	SPBC20F10.06	atg7	mad2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Matsuhara H (2016)	26696398	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517956	2539461	2539698	276024	276251	SPCC63.08c	SPBC11B10.02c	atg1	his3	cvt10|ppk36	pi009|SPACTOKYO_453.27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Matsuhara H (2016)	26696398	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517957	2539461	2540290	276024	276821	SPCC63.08c	SPBC29A3.02c	atg1	his7	cvt10|ppk36	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Matsuhara H (2016)	26696398	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517958	2539461	2539650	276024	276205	SPCC63.08c	SPBC1711.13	atg1	his2	cvt10|ppk36	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Matsuhara H (2016)	26696398	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517959	2540790	2539650	277309	276205	SPBC6B1.05c	SPBC1711.13	atg7	his2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Matsuhara H (2016)	26696398	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517960	2540790	2539698	277309	276251	SPBC6B1.05c	SPBC11B10.02c	atg7	his3	-	pi009|SPACTOKYO_453.27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Matsuhara H (2016)	26696398	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517961	2540790	2540290	277309	276821	SPBC6B1.05c	SPBC29A3.02c	atg7	his7	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Matsuhara H (2016)	26696398	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517962	2541691	2539650	278187	276205	SPAC25A8.02	SPBC1711.13	atg14	his2	SPAC25A8.02	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Matsuhara H (2016)	26696398	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517963	2541691	2539698	278187	276251	SPAC25A8.02	SPBC11B10.02c	atg14	his3	SPAC25A8.02	pi009|SPACTOKYO_453.27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Matsuhara H (2016)	26696398	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517964	2541691	2540290	278187	276821	SPAC25A8.02	SPBC29A3.02c	atg14	his7	SPAC25A8.02	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Matsuhara H (2016)	26696398	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517965	2540283	2539461	276814	276024	SPBC1A4.02c	SPCC63.08c	leu1	atg1	SPBC1E8.07c	cvt10|ppk36	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Matsuhara H (2016)	26696398	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517966	2540283	2541691	276814	278187	SPBC1A4.02c	SPAC25A8.02	leu1	atg14	SPBC1E8.07c	SPAC25A8.02	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Matsuhara H (2016)	26696398	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517967	2540283	2540790	276814	277309	SPBC1A4.02c	SPBC6B1.05c	leu1	atg7	SPBC1E8.07c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Matsuhara H (2016)	26696398	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517968	2541628	2540860	278124	277377	SPAC110.02	SPBC428.17c	pds5	wpl1	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Murayama Y (2015)	26687354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517969	2540557	2543010	277084	279448	SPBC29A10.04	SPAC10F6.09c	psm1	psm3	smc1	smc3	Co-purification	physical	Murayama Y (2015)	26687354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517970	2540557	2542657	277084	279111	SPBC29A10.04	SPAC31A2.05c	psm1	mis4	smc1	-	Co-purification	physical	Murayama Y (2015)	26687354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517971	2540557	2541628	277084	278124	SPBC29A10.04	SPAC110.02	psm1	pds5	smc1	-	Co-purification	physical	Murayama Y (2015)	26687354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517972	2540557	2539447	277084	276010	SPBC29A10.04	SPCC338.17c	psm1	rad21	smc1	-	Co-purification	physical	Murayama Y (2015)	26687354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517973	2540557	2542387	277084	278851	SPBC29A10.04	SPAC17H9.20	psm1	psc3	smc1	SPAC607.01	Co-purification	physical	Murayama Y (2015)	26687354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517974	2540557	2542301	277084	278768	SPBC29A10.04	SPAC1687.18c	psm1	ssl3	smc1	-	Co-purification	physical	Murayama Y (2015)	26687354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517975	2540557	2540860	277084	277377	SPBC29A10.04	SPBC428.17c	psm1	wpl1	smc1	-	Co-purification	physical	Murayama Y (2015)	26687354	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517976	2539644	2540578	276199	277104	SPBC16E9.01c	SPBC26H8.06	php4	grx4	SPBP16F5.09c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Encinar del Dedo J (2015)	25806539	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517977	2539123	2542961	275695	279401	SPCC18B5.03	SPAC10F6.16	wee1	mug134	-	igo1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chica N (2016)	26776736	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517978	2542632	2542961	279086	279401	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC10F6.16	cdc25	mug134	sal2	igo1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Chica N (2016)	26776736	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517979	3361535	2542961	280611	279401	SPAPB18E9.02c	SPAC10F6.16	ppk18	mug134	-	igo1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chica N (2016)	26776736	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517980	3361535	2539208	280611	275778	SPAPB18E9.02c	SPCC1450.11c	ppk18	cek1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Chica N (2016)	26776736	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517981	2540720	3361535	277243	280611	SPBC216.07c	SPAPB18E9.02c	tor2	ppk18	SPBC646.01c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chica N (2016)	26776736	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517982	2540720	2542961	277243	279401	SPBC216.07c	SPAC10F6.16	tor2	mug134	SPBC646.01c	igo1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chica N (2016)	26776736	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517983	2542961	2541889	279401	278379	SPAC10F6.16	SPAC2F7.03c	mug134	pom1	igo1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chica N (2016)	26776736	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517984	2542961	2543666	279401	280080	SPAC10F6.16	SPAC644.06c	mug134	cdr1	igo1	nim1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Chica N (2016)	26776736	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517985	2542961	2542200	279401	278675	SPAC10F6.16	SPAC19D5.01	mug134	pyp2	igo1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Chica N (2016)	26776736	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517986	2542961	2541652	279401	278148	SPAC10F6.16	SPAC24B11.06c	mug134	sty1	igo1	phh1|spc1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Chica N (2016)	26776736	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517987	2543470	2540635	279890	277161	SPAC688.07c	SPBC23G7.08c	SPAC688.07c	rga7	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2016)	27168121	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517988	2543470	2540112	279890	276649	SPAC688.07c	SPBC11C11.02	SPAC688.07c	imp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2016)	27168121	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517989	2543470	2539992	279890	276536	SPAC688.07c	SPBC1289.04c	SPAC688.07c	pob1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2016)	27168121	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517990	2543470	2539847	279890	276395	SPAC688.07c	SPBC530.14c	SPAC688.07c	dsk1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2016)	27168121	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517991	2543470	2540371	279890	276900	SPAC688.07c	SPBC36.11	SPAC688.07c	SPBC36.11	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2016)	27168121	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517992	2543470	2541264	279890	277778	SPAC688.07c	SPBC902.06	SPAC688.07c	mto2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2016)	27168121	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517993	2543470	2542073	279890	278550	SPAC688.07c	SPAC26F1.01	SPAC688.07c	sec74	-	SPAPJ691.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2016)	27168121	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517994	2543470	2541607	279890	278104	SPAC688.07c	SPAC24B11.10c	SPAC688.07c	cfh1	-	chr3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2016)	27168121	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517995	2543470	2538903	279890	275481	SPAC688.07c	SPCC16C4.02c	SPAC688.07c	SPCC16C4.02c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chen JS (2016)	27168121	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517996	2543470	2538822	279890	275403	SPAC688.07c	SPCC1840.02c	SPAC688.07c	bgs4	-	cwg1|orb11|pbr1|sph1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chen JS (2016)	27168121	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517997	2543470	2539437	279890	276000	SPAC688.07c	SPCC645.06c	SPAC688.07c	rgf3	-	lad1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chen JS (2016)	27168121	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517998	2543470	2541599	279890	278096	SPAC688.07c	SPAC24B11.11c	SPAC688.07c	sid2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chen JS (2016)	27168121	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2517999	2543470	2540737	279890	277260	SPAC688.07c	SPBC19G7.05c	SPAC688.07c	bgs1	-	cps1|drc1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Chen JS (2016)	27168121	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518000	2539004	2540584	275578	277110	SPCC4G3.05c	SPBC28F2.07	mus81	sfr1	slx3	dds20|mug13	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Lorenz A (2014)	25414342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518001	2539004	2543685	275578	280099	SPCC4G3.05c	SPAC3C7.03c	mus81	rad55	slx3	rhp55	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Lorenz A (2014)	25414342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518002	2539004	2539770	275578	276321	SPCC4G3.05c	SPBC1685.11	mus81	rlp1	slx3	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Lorenz A (2014)	25414342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518003	2539004	2542295	275578	278763	SPCC4G3.05c	SPAC17H9.03c	mus81	rdl1	slx3	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Lorenz A (2014)	25414342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518004	2539004	2542106	275578	278582	SPCC4G3.05c	SPAC8E11.03c	mus81	dmc1	slx3	dmp1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Lorenz A (2014)	25414342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518005	2540584	2543685	277110	280099	SPBC28F2.07	SPAC3C7.03c	sfr1	rad55	dds20|mug13	rhp55	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lorenz A (2014)	25414342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518006	2540584	2539770	277110	276321	SPBC28F2.07	SPBC1685.11	sfr1	rlp1	dds20|mug13	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lorenz A (2014)	25414342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518007	2540584	2541620	277110	278117	SPBC28F2.07	SPAC2G11.12	sfr1	rqh1	dds20|mug13	hus2|rad12|rec9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lorenz A (2014)	25414342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518008	2542106	2543685	278582	280099	SPAC8E11.03c	SPAC3C7.03c	dmc1	rad55	dmp1	rhp55	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lorenz A (2014)	25414342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518009	2542106	2539770	278582	276321	SPAC8E11.03c	SPBC1685.11	dmc1	rlp1	dmp1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lorenz A (2014)	25414342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518010	2542106	2541620	278582	278117	SPAC8E11.03c	SPAC2G11.12	dmc1	rqh1	dmp1	hus2|rad12|rec9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lorenz A (2014)	25414342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518011	2543668	2541620	280082	278117	SPAC9.05	SPAC2G11.12	fml1	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lorenz A (2014)	25414342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518012	2543086	2541158	279519	277673	SPAC30D11.10	SPBC660.13c	rad52	ssb1	rad22|rad22A	rad11|rpa1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Murayama Y (2013)	24186976	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518013	2539869	2540880	276415	277397	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC582.03	cdc2	cdc13	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	-	Co-purification	physical	Caspari T (2015)	26131711	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518014	2539869	2539087	276415	275659	SPBC11B10.09	SPCC1259.13	cdc2	chk1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	rad27	Co-purification	physical	Caspari T (2015)	26131711	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518015	2540601	2542313	277127	278779	SPBC29A3.14c	SPAC16A10.07c	trt1	taz1	-	myb|myb1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Subramanian L (2008)	18160711	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518016	2542313	2540601	278779	277127	SPAC16A10.07c	SPBC29A3.14c	taz1	trt1	myb|myb1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Subramanian L (2008)	18160711	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518026	2541033	2542536	277548	278993	SPBC3B9.21	SPAC18G6.09c	dcp1	SPAC18G6.09c	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Valkov E (2016)	27183195	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518027	2541033	2542503	277548	278961	SPBC3B9.21	SPAC19A8.12	dcp1	dcp2	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Valkov E (2016)	27183195	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518028	2542757	2542150	279207	278626	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC17A5.11	mre11	rec12	rad32	spo11	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Limbo O (2007)	17936710	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518029	2538706	2542150	275290	278626	SPCC338.08	SPAC17A5.11	ctp1	rec12	mug38|nip1|slr9	spo11	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Limbo O (2007)	17936710	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518030	2538706	2541045	275290	277560	SPCC338.08	SPBC543.03c	ctp1	pku80	mug38|nip1|slr9	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Limbo O (2007)	17936710	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518031	2542757	2542757	279207	279207	SPAC13C5.07	SPAC13C5.07	mre11	mre11	rad32	rad32	Two-hybrid	physical	Limbo O (2007)	17936710	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518032	2541635	2542757	278131	279207	SPAC1556.01c	SPAC13C5.07	rad50	mre11	SPAP4C9.01c	rad32	Two-hybrid	physical	Limbo O (2007)	17936710	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518033	3361306	2542757	280382	279207	SPBC6B1.09c	SPAC13C5.07	nbs1	mre11	slr10	rad32	Two-hybrid	physical	Limbo O (2007)	17936710	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518034	2538706	2538706	275290	275290	SPCC338.08	SPCC338.08	ctp1	ctp1	mug38|nip1|slr9	mug38|nip1|slr9	Two-hybrid	physical	Limbo O (2007)	17936710	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518035	2540072	2541519	276610	278020	SPBC16H5.07c	SPAC227.07c	ppa2	pab1	-	ret1	Co-purification	physical	Nie M (2016)	27398807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518036	2540618	2541519	277144	278020	SPBC3D6.11c	SPAC227.07c	slx8	pab1	-	ret1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nie M (2016)	27398807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518037	2540618	2540072	277144	276610	SPBC3D6.11c	SPBC16H5.07c	slx8	ppa2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nie M (2016)	27398807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518038	2540618	2542349	277144	278814	SPBC3D6.11c	SPAC1782.05	slx8	ypa2	-	SPAC1782.05|pta2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nie M (2016)	27398807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518039	2542268	2541519	278737	278020	SPAC17A5.07c	SPAC227.07c	ulp2	pab1	-	ret1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nie M (2016)	27398807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518040	2540802	2541519	277321	278020	SPBC1921.02	SPAC227.07c	rad60	pab1	-	ret1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nie M (2016)	27398807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518041	2540618	2539087	277144	275659	SPBC3D6.11c	SPCC1259.13	slx8	chk1	-	rad27	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Nie M (2016)	27398807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518042	2543580	2541519	279995	278020	SPAC644.14c	SPAC227.07c	rad51	pab1	rhp51	ret1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nie M (2016)	27398807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518043	2539087	2541519	275659	278020	SPCC1259.13	SPAC227.07c	chk1	pab1	rad27	ret1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nie M (2016)	27398807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518044	2538959	2541519	275533	278020	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC227.07c	cds1	pab1	-	ret1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nie M (2016)	27398807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518045	2541620	2541519	278117	278020	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC227.07c	rqh1	pab1	hus2|rad12|rec9	ret1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nie M (2016)	27398807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518046	2539623	2541519	276180	278020	SPBC16A3.09c	SPAC227.07c	ufd1	pab1	-	ret1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nie M (2016)	27398807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518047	2539537	2539642	276099	276197	SPCP1E11.04c	SPBC1706.01	pal1	tea4	-	wsh3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kettenbach AN (2015)	25720772	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518048	2538706	2543164	275290	279595	SPCC338.08	SPAC3G6.06c	ctp1	rad2	mug38|nip1|slr9	fen1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Akamatsu Y (2008)	18378696	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518049	3361306	2543164	280382	279595	SPBC6B1.09c	SPAC3G6.06c	nbs1	rad2	slr10	fen1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Akamatsu Y (2008)	18378696	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518050	3361306	2538706	280382	275290	SPBC6B1.09c	SPCC338.08	nbs1	ctp1	slr10	mug38|nip1|slr9	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Akamatsu Y (2008)	18378696	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518051	2541600	2538728	278097	275312	SPAC6F12.17	SPCC63.11	rna14	prp28	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yadav S (2016)	27350684	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518052	2541600	2541185	278097	277699	SPAC6F12.17	SPBC6B1.07	rna14	prp1	-	zer1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yadav S (2016)	27350684	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518053	2538706	2543164	275290	279595	SPCC338.08	SPAC3G6.06c	ctp1	rad2	mug38|nip1|slr9	fen1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Jensen KL (2016)	27325741	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	POMBASE
2518054	2538706	2541849	275290	278340	SPCC338.08	SPAC20G8.01	ctp1	cdc17	mug38|nip1|slr9	SPAC57A10.13c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Jensen KL (2016)	27325741	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	POMBASE
2518055	2538706	2539087	275290	275659	SPCC338.08	SPCC1259.13	ctp1	chk1	mug38|nip1|slr9	rad27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Jensen KL (2016)	27325741	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	-	-	POMBASE
2518056	2538706	2541045	275290	277560	SPCC338.08	SPBC543.03c	ctp1	pku80	mug38|nip1|slr9	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Jensen KL (2016)	27325741	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:wild type|viability:wild type	-	-	POMBASE
2518057	2539352	2540492	275918	277020	SPCC188.07	SPBC2D10.13	ccq1	est1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hu X (2016)	27253066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518058	2539352	2542414	275918	278878	SPCC188.07	SPAC6F6.16c	ccq1	tpz1	-	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hu X (2016)	27253066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518059	2539352	2540601	275918	277127	SPCC188.07	SPBC29A3.14c	ccq1	trt1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hu X (2016)	27253066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518060	2542414	2539352	278878	275918	SPAC6F6.16c	SPCC188.07	tpz1	ccq1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hu X (2016)	27253066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518061	2542414	2540601	278878	277127	SPAC6F6.16c	SPBC29A3.14c	tpz1	trt1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hu X (2016)	27253066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518062	2539403	2539455	275968	276018	SPCC736.11	SPCC736.09c	ago1	SPCC736.09c	csp9	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Gomez-Escobar N (2016)	27183912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518063	2539403	2542313	275968	278779	SPCC736.11	SPAC16A10.07c	ago1	taz1	csp9	myb|myb1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Gomez-Escobar N (2016)	27183912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518064	2539455	2541714	276018	278209	SPCC736.09c	SPAC30.03c	SPCC736.09c	tsn1	-	mug90|tsn	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Gomez-Escobar N (2016)	27183912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518065	2541714	2539455	278209	276018	SPAC30.03c	SPCC736.09c	tsn1	SPCC736.09c	mug90|tsn	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Gomez-Escobar N (2016)	27183912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518070	2542358	2539205	278823	275775	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC4B3.15	clp1	mid1	flp1	dmf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Clifford DM (2008)	18378776	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518071	2542358	2539205	278823	275775	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC4B3.15	clp1	mid1	flp1	dmf1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Clifford DM (2008)	18378776	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518072	2539205	2542358	275775	278823	SPCC4B3.15	SPAC1782.09c	mid1	clp1	dmf1	flp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Clifford DM (2008)	18378776	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518073	2542358	2539205	278823	275775	SPAC1782.09c	SPCC4B3.15	clp1	mid1	flp1	dmf1	Two-hybrid	physical	Clifford DM (2008)	18378776	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518074	2541975	2542358	278460	278823	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC1782.09c	cdc15	clp1	-	flp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Clifford DM (2008)	18378776	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518075	2540737	2539205	277260	275775	SPBC19G7.05c	SPCC4B3.15	bgs1	mid1	cps1|drc1	dmf1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Clifford DM (2008)	18378776	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518076	2540737	2542358	277260	278823	SPBC19G7.05c	SPAC1782.09c	bgs1	clp1	cps1|drc1	flp1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Clifford DM (2008)	18378776	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518077	2543526	2542358	279944	278823	SPAC4A8.15c	SPAC1782.09c	cdc3	clp1	-	flp1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Clifford DM (2008)	18378776	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518078	2543526	2539205	279944	275775	SPAC4A8.15c	SPCC4B3.15	cdc3	mid1	-	dmf1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Clifford DM (2008)	18378776	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518079	2541975	2539205	278460	275775	SPAC20G8.05c	SPCC4B3.15	cdc15	mid1	-	dmf1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Clifford DM (2008)	18378776	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518080	2541975	2542358	278460	278823	SPAC20G8.05c	SPAC1782.09c	cdc15	clp1	-	flp1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Clifford DM (2008)	18378776	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518081	2541603	2542358	278100	278823	SPAC1F5.04c	SPAC1782.09c	cdc12	clp1	-	flp1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Clifford DM (2008)	18378776	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518082	2541603	2539205	278100	275775	SPAC1F5.04c	SPCC4B3.15	cdc12	mid1	-	dmf1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Clifford DM (2008)	18378776	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518083	2541071	2542207	277586	278682	SPBC582.05c	SPAC17H9.10c	brc1	ddb1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2015)	25795664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518084	2541071	2543289	277586	279714	SPBC582.05c	SPAC9E9.08	brc1	rad26	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2015)	25795664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518085	2541071	2543577	277586	279992	SPBC582.05c	SPAC4H3.05	brc1	srs2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2015)	25795664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518086	2541071	2540352	277586	276881	SPBC582.05c	SPBC215.03c	brc1	csn1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2015)	25795664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518087	2541071	2542032	277586	278514	SPBC582.05c	SPAC23C11.04c	brc1	pnk1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2015)	25795664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518088	2541071	2542222	277586	278695	SPBC582.05c	SPAC31G5.18c	brc1	sde2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2015)	25795664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518089	2541071	3361323	277586	280399	SPBC582.05c	SPBC30D10.04	brc1	swi3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2015)	25795664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518090	2541071	2541529	277586	278029	SPBC582.05c	SPAC1687.13c	brc1	csn5	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2015)	25795664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518091	2541071	2541643	277586	278139	SPBC582.05c	SPAC14C4.13	brc1	rad17	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2015)	25795664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518092	2540352	2540992	276881	277508	SPBC215.03c	SPBC342.05	csn1	crb2	-	rhp9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2015)	25795664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518093	2541071	2540281	277586	276812	SPBC582.05c	SPBC2G2.14	brc1	csi1	-	SPBC2G2.14	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sanchez A (2015)	25795664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518094	2541071	2541792	277586	278283	SPBC582.05c	SPAC22E12.19	brc1	snt1	-	SPAC2E12.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2015)	25795664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518095	2541071	2539971	277586	276515	SPBC582.05c	SPBC1105.04c	brc1	cbp1	-	abp1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2015)	25795664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518096	2541071	2540695	277586	277219	SPBC582.05c	SPBC19G7.01c	brc1	msh2	-	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2015)	25795664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518097	2541071	2541045	277586	277560	SPBC582.05c	SPBC543.03c	brc1	pku80	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2015)	25795664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518098	2541071	2538848	277586	275429	SPBC582.05c	SPCC613.12c	brc1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2015)	25795664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518099	2543088	2538895	279521	275473	SPAC323.08	SPCC830.09c	rmp1	pop5	SPAC323.08	SPCC830.09c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2014)	25401760	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518100	2543088	2540841	279521	277358	SPAC323.08	SPBC18H10.12c	rmp1	rpl701	SPAC323.08	rpl7|rpl7-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2014)	25401760	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518101	2543088	2541548	279521	278048	SPAC323.08	SPAC25B8.16	rmp1	pop100	SPAC323.08	SPAC25B8.16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2014)	25401760	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518102	2543088	2541332	279521	277844	SPAC323.08	SPBP8B7.01c	rmp1	pop7	SPAC323.08	pop6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2014)	25401760	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518103	2543088	2543062	279521	279496	SPAC323.08	SPAC3A12.04c	rmp1	rpp1	SPAC323.08	SPAC3A12.04c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2014)	25401760	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518104	2543088	2538975	279521	275549	SPAC323.08	SPCC16C4.05	rmp1	pop23	SPAC323.08	SPCC16C4.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2014)	25401760	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518105	2543088	3361273	279521	280349	SPAC323.08	SPBC1709.20	rmp1	pop8	SPAC323.08	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2014)	25401760	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518106	2543088	2539536	279521	276098	SPAC323.08	SPCC16C4.19	rmp1	rpp21	SPAC323.08	SPCC16C4.19|SPCC5E4.08	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2014)	25401760	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518107	2543088	2543013	279521	279451	SPAC323.08	SPAC6C3.09	rmp1	rpp40	SPAC323.08	SPAC6C3.09	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2014)	25401760	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518108	2543088	2539947	279521	276491	SPAC323.08	SPBC1703.01c	rmp1	pop4	SPAC323.08	SPBC1703.01c|SPBP4H10.22c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2014)	25401760	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518109	2540841	5802869	277358	858007	SPBC18H10.12c	SPNCRNA.82	rpl701	mrp1	rpl7|rpl7-1	mrp-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2014)	25401760	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518110	2540841	2538895	277358	275473	SPBC18H10.12c	SPCC830.09c	rpl701	pop5	rpl7|rpl7-1	SPCC830.09c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2014)	25401760	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518111	2540841	2541548	277358	278048	SPBC18H10.12c	SPAC25B8.16	rpl701	pop100	rpl7|rpl7-1	SPAC25B8.16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2014)	25401760	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518112	2540841	2541332	277358	277844	SPBC18H10.12c	SPBP8B7.01c	rpl701	pop7	rpl7|rpl7-1	pop6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2014)	25401760	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518113	2540841	2543062	277358	279496	SPBC18H10.12c	SPAC3A12.04c	rpl701	rpp1	rpl7|rpl7-1	SPAC3A12.04c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2014)	25401760	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518114	2540841	2538975	277358	275549	SPBC18H10.12c	SPCC16C4.05	rpl701	pop23	rpl7|rpl7-1	SPCC16C4.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2014)	25401760	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518115	2540841	3361273	277358	280349	SPBC18H10.12c	SPBC1709.20	rpl701	pop8	rpl7|rpl7-1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2014)	25401760	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518116	2540841	2539536	277358	276098	SPBC18H10.12c	SPCC16C4.19	rpl701	rpp21	rpl7|rpl7-1	SPCC16C4.19|SPCC5E4.08	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2014)	25401760	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518117	2540841	2539947	277358	276491	SPBC18H10.12c	SPBC1703.01c	rpl701	pop4	rpl7|rpl7-1	SPBC1703.01c|SPBP4H10.22c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2014)	25401760	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518118	2540841	2543013	277358	279451	SPBC18H10.12c	SPAC6C3.09	rpl701	rpp40	rpl7|rpl7-1	SPAC6C3.09	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Saito Y (2014)	25401760	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518119	2541327	2540473	277839	277001	SPBP23A10.10	SPBC30D10.10c	ppk32	tor1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kowalczyk KM (2016)	27191590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518120	2540283	2541327	276814	277839	SPBC1A4.02c	SPBP23A10.10	leu1	ppk32	SPBC1E8.07c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kowalczyk KM (2016)	27191590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518121	2540720	2541327	277243	277839	SPBC216.07c	SPBP23A10.10	tor2	ppk32	SPBC646.01c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kowalczyk KM (2016)	27191590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518122	2540473	2541327	277001	277839	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBP23A10.10	tor1	ppk32	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Kowalczyk KM (2016)	27191590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518123	2541327	2542776	277839	279225	SPBP23A10.10	SPAC167.01	ppk32	ire1	-	ppk4	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kowalczyk KM (2016)	27191590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518124	2540473	2541327	277001	277839	SPBC30D10.10c	SPBP23A10.10	tor1	ppk32	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Kowalczyk KM (2016)	27191590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518125	2540368	2542070	276897	278547	SPBC36.05c	SPAC29B12.02c	clr6	set2	-	kmt3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Matsuda A (2015)	26205977	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518126	2541628	2538736	278124	275320	SPAC110.02	SPCC1322.12c	pds5	bub1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Wang SW (2002)	11861765	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518127	2541628	2540582	278124	277108	SPAC110.02	SPBC26H8.07c	pds5	nda3	-	alp12|ben1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Wang SW (2002)	11861765	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518128	2542207	14218114	278682	4254476	SPAC17H9.10c	SPAC3F10.19	ddb1	spd2	-	SPNCRNA.527|SPNGAF9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Vejrup-Hansen R (2014)	24652833	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518129	2540509	2542875	277037	279320	SPBC21H7.06c	SPAC13G7.02c	opi10	ssa1	SPBC21H7.06c|Hikeshi	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Oda Y (2014)	24768994	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518130	2539843	2542875	276391	279320	SPBC16G5.11c	SPAC13G7.02c	bag101	ssa1	bag1|bag1-a	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Poulsen EG (2017)	27966061	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518131	2539843	2540199	276391	276732	SPBC16G5.11c	SPBC1709.05	bag101	sks2	bag1|bag1-a	hsc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Poulsen EG (2017)	27966061	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518132	2539843	2539225	276391	275795	SPBC16G5.11c	SPCC1739.13	bag101	ssa2	bag1|bag1-a	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Poulsen EG (2017)	27966061	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518133	2540564	2542875	277091	279320	SPBC530.03c	SPAC13G7.02c	bag102	ssa1	bag1-b	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Poulsen EG (2017)	27966061	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518134	2540564	2539225	277091	275795	SPBC530.03c	SPCC1739.13	bag102	ssa2	bag1-b	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Poulsen EG (2017)	27966061	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518135	2540564	2540199	277091	276732	SPBC530.03c	SPBC1709.05	bag102	sks2	bag1-b	hsc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Poulsen EG (2017)	27966061	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518136	2539843	2541268	276391	277782	SPBC16G5.11c	SPBP19A11.03c	bag101	mts4	bag1|bag1-a	rpn1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Poulsen EG (2017)	27966061	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518137	2540564	2541268	277091	277782	SPBC530.03c	SPBP19A11.03c	bag102	mts4	bag1-b	rpn1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Poulsen EG (2017)	27966061	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518138	2539225	2541888	275795	278378	SPCC1739.13	SPAC2E12.02	ssa2	hsf1	-	hsf|hstf	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Poulsen EG (2017)	27966061	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518139	2539843	2540199	276391	276732	SPBC16G5.11c	SPBC1709.05	bag101	sks2	bag1|bag1-a	hsc1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Poulsen EG (2017)	27966061	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518140	2539843	2542875	276391	279320	SPBC16G5.11c	SPAC13G7.02c	bag101	ssa1	bag1|bag1-a	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Poulsen EG (2017)	27966061	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518141	2539843	2540199	276391	276732	SPBC16G5.11c	SPBC1709.05	bag101	sks2	bag1|bag1-a	hsc1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Poulsen EG (2017)	27966061	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518142	2539843	2541888	276391	278378	SPBC16G5.11c	SPAC2E12.02	bag101	hsf1	bag1|bag1-a	hsf|hstf	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Poulsen EG (2017)	27966061	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518143	2540240	2541978	276772	278463	SPBC31F10.16	SPAC6G9.12	SPBC31F10.16	cfr1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hoya M (2017)	27974503	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518144	2541306	2541978	277818	278463	SPBP16F5.07	SPAC6G9.12	apm1	cfr1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hoya M (2017)	27974503	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518145	2540570	2541978	277097	278463	SPBC25H2.16c	SPAC6G9.12	gga22	cfr1	SPBC25H2.16c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hoya M (2017)	27974503	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518146	2541527	2541978	278027	278463	SPAC31A2.09c	SPAC6G9.12	apm4	cfr1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hoya M (2017)	27974503	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518147	2541978	2541306	278463	277818	SPAC6G9.12	SPBP16F5.07	cfr1	apm1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hoya M (2017)	27974503	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518148	2541978	2541469	278463	277971	SPAC6G9.12	SPAC1F3.05	cfr1	gga21	-	SPAC1F3.05	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hoya M (2017)	27974503	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518149	2541978	2540570	278463	277097	SPAC6G9.12	SPBC25H2.16c	cfr1	gga22	-	SPBC25H2.16c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hoya M (2017)	27974503	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518150	2541978	2540737	278463	277260	SPAC6G9.12	SPBC19G7.05c	cfr1	bgs1	-	cps1|drc1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Hoya M (2017)	27974503	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518151	2541978	2543336	278463	279759	SPAC6G9.12	SPAC688.11	cfr1	end4	-	sla2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Hoya M (2017)	27974503	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518152	2541978	2540570	278463	277097	SPAC6G9.12	SPBC25H2.16c	cfr1	gga22	-	SPBC25H2.16c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Hoya M (2017)	27974503	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518153	2541978	2541306	278463	277818	SPAC6G9.12	SPBP16F5.07	cfr1	apm1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Hoya M (2017)	27974503	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518154	2541978	2541305	278463	277817	SPAC6G9.12	SPBC9B6.08	cfr1	clc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Hoya M (2017)	27974503	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518155	2541978	2542403	278463	278867	SPAC6G9.12	SPAC19A8.05c	cfr1	sst4	-	vps27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hoya M (2017)	27974503	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518156	2541305	2540570	277817	277097	SPBC9B6.08	SPBC25H2.16c	clc1	gga22	-	SPBC25H2.16c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Hoya M (2017)	27974503	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518157	2541305	2541306	277817	277818	SPBC9B6.08	SPBP16F5.07	clc1	apm1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Hoya M (2017)	27974503	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518158	2540570	2541469	277097	277971	SPBC25H2.16c	SPAC1F3.05	gga22	gga21	SPBC25H2.16c	SPAC1F3.05	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Hoya M (2017)	27974503	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518159	2540570	2541469	277097	277971	SPBC25H2.16c	SPAC1F3.05	gga22	gga21	SPBC25H2.16c	SPAC1F3.05	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hoya M (2017)	27974503	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518160	2540317	2541774	276847	278268	SPBC24C6.05	SPAC22E12.05c	sec28	rer1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hoya M (2017)	27974503	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518161	2540240	2541306	276772	277818	SPBC31F10.16	SPBP16F5.07	SPBC31F10.16	apm1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Hoya M (2017)	27974503	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518162	2538999	2540024	275573	276568	SPCC162.09c	SPBP4H10.04	hmg1	ppb1	its12	SPBC1346.01c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fang Y (2009)	19486165	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518163	2538999	2540660	275573	277185	SPCC162.09c	SPBC21.06c	hmg1	cdc7	its12	its10|pld1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Fang Y (2009)	19486165	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518164	2538999	2539149	275573	275721	SPCC162.09c	SPCC1739.11c	hmg1	cdc11	its12	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Fang Y (2009)	19486165	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518165	2538999	2542293	275573	278761	SPCC162.09c	SPAC17G8.14c	hmg1	pck1	its12	SPAC22H10.01c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Fang Y (2009)	19486165	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518166	2538999	2539649	275573	276204	SPCC162.09c	SPBC12D12.04c	hmg1	pck2	its12	pkc1|sts6	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Fang Y (2009)	19486165	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518167	2538999	2539612	275573	276170	SPCC162.09c	SPBC15C4.03	hmg1	SPBC15C4.03	its12	rep1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Fang Y (2009)	19486165	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518168	2538999	2540933	275573	277449	SPCC162.09c	SPBC36.06c	hmg1	spo9	its12	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Fang Y (2009)	19486165	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518169	2538999	2542818	275573	279265	SPCC162.09c	SPAC13G6.11c	hmg1	erg12	its12	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Fang Y (2009)	19486165	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518170	2538999	2542293	275573	278761	SPCC162.09c	SPAC17G8.14c	hmg1	pck1	its12	SPAC22H10.01c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Fang Y (2009)	19486165	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518171	2540880	2539869	277397	276415	SPBC582.03	SPBC11B10.09	cdc13	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Co-purification	physical	Fleig UN (1991)	2038306	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518172	2539109	2542652	275681	279106	SPCC74.03c	SPAC1687.15	ssp2	gsk3	ucp9	skp1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Qingyun (2016)	27604537	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518173	2539109	2541233	275681	277747	SPCC74.03c	SPBC8D2.01	ssp2	gsk31	ucp9	pi064	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Qingyun (2016)	27604537	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518174	2542652	2539109	279106	275681	SPAC1687.15	SPCC74.03c	gsk3	ssp2	skp1	ucp9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Qingyun (2016)	27604537	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518175	2541233	2539109	277747	275681	SPBC8D2.01	SPCC74.03c	gsk31	ssp2	pi064	ucp9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Qingyun (2016)	27604537	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518176	2542652	2541233	279106	277747	SPAC1687.15	SPBC8D2.01	gsk3	gsk31	skp1	pi064	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Qingyun (2016)	27604537	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518177	2539857	2543044	276404	279479	SPBC1604.20c	SPAC3C7.12	tea2	tip1	klp4	noc1	Two-hybrid	physical	Busch KE (2004)	15177031	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518178	2539560	2543344	276121	279766	SPCC736.08	SPAC56E4.04c	cbf11	cut6	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Prevorovsky M (2016)	27687771	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518179	2539560	2543344	276121	279766	SPCC736.08	SPAC56E4.04c	cbf11	cut6	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Prevorovsky M (2016)	27687771	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518180	2540810	2543351	277329	279773	SPBC19C7.03	SPAC8C9.03	cyr1	cgs1	git2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Matsuo Y (2016)	27756188	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518181	2541806	2539781	278297	276331	SPAC4G8.13c	SPBC106.10	prz1	pka1	-	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Matsuo Y (2016)	27756188	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518182	2539219	2540589	275789	277115	SPCC1795.01c	SPBC20F10.06	mad3	mad2	SPCC895.02	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Zich J (2016)	26882497	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518183	2542219	9407039	278693	1028402	SPAC18G6.03	SPCC1183.12	ypt3	spo13	-	SPNGAF60|SPNCRNA.546	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Imada K (2016)	27630265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518184	2543280	9407039	279707	1028402	SPAC9E9.07c	SPCC1183.12	ypt2	spo13	-	SPNGAF60|SPNCRNA.546	Two-hybrid	physical	Imada K (2016)	27630265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518185	2541930	2543280	278418	279707	SPAC23C4.10	SPAC9E9.07c	sec2	ypt2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Imada K (2016)	27630265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518186	2542219	2541930	278693	278418	SPAC18G6.03	SPAC23C4.10	ypt3	sec2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Imada K (2016)	27630265	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518187	2540679	2540719	277204	277242	SPBC3D6.10	SPBC216.05	apn2	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi C (2017)	27687866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518188	2542976	2543659	279414	280073	SPAC9E9.09c	SPAC922.07c	atd1	atd2	SPAC9E9.09c	SPAC922.07c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi C (2017)	27687866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518189	2542976	2539264	279414	275834	SPAC9E9.09c	SPCC550.10	atd1	atd3	SPAC9E9.09c	meu8	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi C (2017)	27687866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518190	2542976	2543086	279414	279519	SPAC9E9.09c	SPAC30D11.10	atd1	rad52	SPAC9E9.09c	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi C (2017)	27687866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518191	2542976	2540728	279414	277251	SPAC9E9.09c	SPBC216.06c	atd1	swi1	SPAC9E9.09c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi C (2017)	27687866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518192	2542976	2543478	279414	279898	SPAC9E9.09c	SPAC688.06c	atd1	slx4	SPAC9E9.09c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi C (2017)	27687866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518193	2543118	2540719	279550	277242	SPAC3G6.11	SPBC216.05	chl1	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi C (2017)	27687866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518194	2543118	2543668	279550	280082	SPAC3G6.11	SPAC9.05	chl1	fml1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi C (2017)	27687866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518195	2543118	2542976	279550	279414	SPAC3G6.11	SPAC9E9.09c	chl1	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi C (2017)	27687866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518196	2539666	2540719	276221	277242	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC216.05	eso1	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi C (2017)	27687866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518197	2543668	2542976	280082	279414	SPAC9.05	SPAC9E9.09c	fml1	atd1	-	SPAC9E9.09c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi C (2017)	27687866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518198	2543668	2540728	280082	277251	SPAC9.05	SPBC216.06c	fml1	swi1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi C (2017)	27687866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518199	2543668	2540719	280082	277242	SPAC9.05	SPBC216.05	fml1	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi C (2017)	27687866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518200	2543668	2538760	280082	275343	SPAC9.05	SPCC970.01	fml1	rad16	-	rad10|rad20|swi9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi C (2017)	27687866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518201	2543668	2543086	280082	279519	SPAC9.05	SPAC30D11.10	fml1	rad52	-	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi C (2017)	27687866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518202	2539547	2540719	276108	277242	SPCC553.07c	SPBC216.05	kpa1	rad3	mug40|pol(kappa)|pol-kappa	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi C (2017)	27687866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518203	2543510	2540719	279928	277242	SPAC30D11.07	SPBC216.05	nth1	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi C (2017)	27687866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518204	2538760	2540719	275343	277242	SPCC970.01	SPBC216.05	rad16	rad3	rad10|rad20|swi9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi C (2017)	27687866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518205	2538760	2540728	275343	277251	SPCC970.01	SPBC216.06c	rad16	swi1	rad10|rad20|swi9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi C (2017)	27687866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518206	2543289	2540728	279714	277251	SPAC9E9.08	SPBC216.06c	rad26	swi1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi C (2017)	27687866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518207	2540887	2540719	277404	277242	SPBC4F6.15c	SPBC216.05	swi10	rad3	rad23	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi C (2017)	27687866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518208	2543468	2540728	279888	277251	SPAC521.02	SPBC216.06c	SPAC521.02	swi1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi C (2017)	27687866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518209	2543468	2538751	279888	275334	SPAC521.02	SPCC1442.07c	SPAC521.02	SPCC1442.07c	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi C (2017)	27687866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518210	2538751	2540728	275334	277251	SPCC1442.07c	SPBC216.06c	SPCC1442.07c	swi1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Noguchi C (2017)	27687866	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518211	2543580	2539004	279995	275578	SPAC644.14c	SPCC4G3.05c	rad51	mus81	rhp51	slx3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Onaka AT (2016)	27697832	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518212	2542749	2543580	279199	279995	SPAC15A10.03c	SPAC644.14c	rad54	rad51	rhp54	rhp51	Two-hybrid	physical	Onaka AT (2016)	27697832	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518213	2540624	2539869	277150	276415	SPBC24C6.07	SPBC11B10.09	cdc14	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Fankhauser C (1993)	8334307	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518214	2539377	2540623	275943	277149	SPCC825.03c	SPBC26H8.02c	psy1	sec9	sso1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Maeda Y (2009)	19202289	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518215	2539377	2541731	275943	278225	SPCC825.03c	SPAC6G9.11	psy1	syb1	sso1	snc1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Maeda Y (2009)	19202289	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518216	2543407	2540148	279829	276685	SPAC8F11.07c	SPBC16D10.04c	cdc24	dna2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang H (2016)	27729451	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518217	2543407	2541158	279829	277673	SPAC8F11.07c	SPBC660.13c	cdc24	ssb1	-	rad11|rpa1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhang H (2016)	27729451	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518218	2543407	2540148	279829	276685	SPAC8F11.07c	SPBC16D10.04c	cdc24	dna2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhang H (2016)	27729451	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518219	2543407	2541158	279829	277673	SPAC8F11.07c	SPBC660.13c	cdc24	ssb1	-	rad11|rpa1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhang H (2016)	27729451	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518220	2542059	3361391	278537	280467	SPAC328.06	SPAC13G6.01c	ubp2	rad8	-	SPAC5H10.14c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Alvarez V (2016)	27151298	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518221	2542059	2539686	278537	276241	SPAC328.06	SPBC1734.06	ubp2	rhp18	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Alvarez V (2016)	27151298	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518222	2541307	2540737	277819	277260	SPBP22H7.03	SPBC19G7.05c	SPBP22H7.03	bgs1	pi028|SPACTOKYO_453.06c|SPACTOKYO_453.07	cps1|drc1	Co-purification	physical	Davidson R (2016)	27898700	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518223	2541889	2539642	278379	276197	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC1706.01	pom1	tea4	-	wsh3	Co-purification	physical	Hachet O (2011)	21703453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518224	2539642	2541193	276197	277707	SPBC1706.01	SPBC776.02c	tea4	dis2	wsh3	bws1|sds1	Co-purification	physical	Hachet O (2011)	21703453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518225	2539642	2541193	276197	277707	SPBC1706.01	SPBC776.02c	tea4	dis2	wsh3	bws1|sds1	PCA	physical	Hachet O (2011)	21703453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518226	2539642	2541889	276197	278379	SPBC1706.01	SPAC2F7.03c	tea4	pom1	wsh3	-	PCA	physical	Hachet O (2011)	21703453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518227	2539642	2541889	276197	278379	SPBC1706.01	SPAC2F7.03c	tea4	pom1	wsh3	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Hachet O (2011)	21703453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518228	2540825	2542467	277343	278928	SPBC428.08c	SPAC1834.04	clr4	hht1	-	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Shan CM (2016)	27648579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518229	2540825	2541220	277343	277734	SPBC428.08c	SPBC8D2.04	clr4	hht2	-	h3.2	Protein-peptide	physical	Shan CM (2016)	27648579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518230	2540825	2539804	277343	276354	SPBC428.08c	SPBC1105.11c	clr4	hht3	-	h3.3	Protein-peptide	physical	Shan CM (2016)	27648579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518231	2541633	2542467	278129	278928	SPAC664.01c	SPAC1834.04	swi6	hht1	SPAC824.10c	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Shan CM (2016)	27648579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518232	2541633	2541220	278129	277734	SPAC664.01c	SPBC8D2.04	swi6	hht2	SPAC824.10c	h3.2	Protein-peptide	physical	Shan CM (2016)	27648579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518233	2541633	2539804	278129	276354	SPAC664.01c	SPBC1105.11c	swi6	hht3	SPAC824.10c	h3.3	Protein-peptide	physical	Shan CM (2016)	27648579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518234	2542239	2542467	278711	278928	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC1834.04	chp1	hht1	-	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Shan CM (2016)	27648579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518235	2542239	2541220	278711	277734	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC8D2.04	chp1	hht2	-	h3.2	Protein-peptide	physical	Shan CM (2016)	27648579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518236	2542239	2539804	278711	276354	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC1105.11c	chp1	hht3	-	h3.3	Protein-peptide	physical	Shan CM (2016)	27648579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518237	2540047	2542467	276585	278928	SPBC16C6.10	SPAC1834.04	chp2	hht1	-	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Shan CM (2016)	27648579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518238	2540047	2541220	276585	277734	SPBC16C6.10	SPBC8D2.04	chp2	hht2	-	h3.2	Protein-peptide	physical	Shan CM (2016)	27648579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518239	2540047	2539804	276585	276354	SPBC16C6.10	SPBC1105.11c	chp2	hht3	-	h3.3	Protein-peptide	physical	Shan CM (2016)	27648579	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518240	2540582	2540060	277108	276598	SPBC26H8.07c	SPBC106.01	nda3	mph1	alp12|ben1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Zich J (2012)	22281223	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518241	2540582	2540589	277108	277115	SPBC26H8.07c	SPBC20F10.06	nda3	mad2	alp12|ben1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Zich J (2012)	22281223	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518242	2539513	2541699	276075	278195	SPCC645.05c	SPAP8A3.08	myo2	cdc4	rng5	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Le Goff X (2000)	11069761	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518243	2543576	2541699	279991	278195	SPAC4A8.05c	SPAP8A3.08	myp2	cdc4	myo3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Le Goff X (2000)	11069761	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518244	2543545	2541699	279962	278195	SPAC926.03	SPAP8A3.08	rlc1	cdc4	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Le Goff X (2000)	11069761	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518245	2543545	2539513	279962	276075	SPAC926.03	SPCC645.05c	rlc1	myo2	-	rng5	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Le Goff X (2000)	11069761	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518246	2543545	2543129	279962	279561	SPAC926.03	SPAC4F8.13c	rlc1	rng2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Le Goff X (2000)	11069761	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518247	2539658	2540967	276213	277483	SPBC1105.17	SPBC36B7.08c	cnp1	SPBC36B7.08c	sim2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Dong Q (2016)	27666591	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518248	2540967	2540967	277483	277483	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Dong Q (2016)	27666591	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518249	2540967	2539668	277483	276223	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC36B7.08c	pht1	-	pi001	Two-hybrid	physical	Dong Q (2016)	27666591	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518250	2540967	2539214	277483	275784	SPBC36B7.08c	SPCC1672.10	SPBC36B7.08c	mis16	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Dong Q (2016)	27666591	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518251	2540967	2539668	277483	276223	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC36B7.08c	pht1	-	pi001	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dong Q (2016)	27666591	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518252	2539658	2540967	276213	277483	SPBC1105.17	SPBC36B7.08c	cnp1	SPBC36B7.08c	sim2	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Dong Q (2016)	27666591	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518253	2539658	2541088	276213	277603	SPBC1105.17	SPBC609.05	cnp1	pob3	sim2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Dong Q (2016)	27666591	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518254	2539658	2541355	276213	277866	SPBC1105.17	SPBP8B7.19	cnp1	spt16	sim2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Dong Q (2016)	27666591	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518255	2539658	2540915	276213	277431	SPBC1105.17	SPBC800.13	cnp1	cnp20	sim2	SPBC800.13	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Dong Q (2016)	27666591	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518256	2540009	2542805	276553	279253	SPBC16G5.05c	SPAC15A10.08	scs2	ain1	SPBC16G5.05c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Zhang D (2016)	26877082	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518257	2541213	2543084	277727	279517	SPBC887.14c	SPAC31G5.19	pfh1	abo1	pif1	SPAC31G5.19	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518258	2541213	2538771	277727	275354	SPBC887.14c	SPCC162.05	pfh1	coq3	pif1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518259	2541213	2540148	277727	276685	SPBC887.14c	SPBC16D10.04c	pfh1	dna2	pif1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518260	2541213	2539613	277727	276171	SPBC887.14c	SPBC11C11.11c	pfh1	SPBC11C11.11c	pif1	SPBC3B8.12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518261	2541213	2542477	277727	278937	SPBC887.14c	SPAC1B2.05	pfh1	mcm5	pif1	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518262	2541213	2540271	277727	276802	SPBC887.14c	SPBC30D10.08	pfh1	mgm101	pif1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518263	2541213	2543392	277727	279814	SPBC887.14c	SPAC8F11.03	pfh1	msh3	pif1	swi4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518264	2541213	2541088	277727	277603	SPBC887.14c	SPBC609.05	pfh1	pob3	pif1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518265	2541213	2543086	277727	279519	SPBC887.14c	SPAC30D11.10	pfh1	rad52	pif1	rad22|rad22A	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518266	2541213	2541094	277727	277609	SPBC887.14c	SPBC651.08c	pfh1	rpc1	pif1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518267	2541213	2538885	277727	275463	SPBC887.14c	SPCC330.13	pfh1	rpc37	pif1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518268	2541213	2542687	277727	279140	SPBC887.14c	SPAC26H5.12	pfh1	rpo41	pif1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518269	2541213	2539135	277727	275707	SPBC887.14c	SPCC553.09c	pfh1	spb70	pif1	pol12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518270	2541213	2538781	277727	275362	SPBC887.14c	SPCC1753.01c	pfh1	ssb2	pif1	SPCC584.06c|rpa2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518271	2541213	2539881	277727	276427	SPBC887.14c	SPBC16G5.12c	pfh1	top3	pif1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518272	2541213	3361435	277727	280511	SPBC887.14c	SPAPB17E12.10c	pfh1	SPAPB17E12.10c	pif1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518273	2541213	2542809	277727	279257	SPBC887.14c	SPAC15A10.11	pfh1	ubr11	pif1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518274	2541213	2541659	277727	278155	SPBC887.14c	SPAC1F5.11c	pfh1	tra2	pif1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518275	2541213	2538775	277727	275357	SPBC887.14c	SPCC23B6.05c	pfh1	ssb3	pif1	rpa3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518276	2541213	2541355	277727	277866	SPBC887.14c	SPBP8B7.19	pfh1	spt16	pif1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518277	2541213	2541620	277727	278117	SPBC887.14c	SPAC2G11.12	pfh1	rqh1	pif1	hus2|rad12|rec9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518278	2541213	2541933	277727	278421	SPBC887.14c	SPAC2F3.04c	pfh1	rim1	pif1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518279	2541213	2543393	277727	279815	SPBC887.14c	SPAC4G9.08c	pfh1	rpc2	pif1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518280	2541213	2538851	277727	275432	SPBC887.14c	SPCC18.07	pfh1	rpc53	pif1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518281	2541213	2543629	277727	280043	SPBC887.14c	SPAC3H5.06c	pfh1	pol1	pif1	polA|swi7	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518282	2541213	2539090	277727	275662	SPBC887.14c	SPCC126.02c	pfh1	pku70	pif1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518283	2541213	2539215	277727	275785	SPBC887.14c	SPCC285.16c	pfh1	msh6	pif1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518284	2541213	2542833	277727	279280	SPBC887.14c	SPAC13F5.01c	pfh1	msh1	pif1	SPAC23C11.18c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518285	2541213	2540784	277727	277303	SPBC887.14c	SPBC211.04c	pfh1	mcm6	pif1	mis5	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518286	2541213	2540620	277727	277146	SPBC887.14c	SPBC4.04c	pfh1	mcm2	pif1	cdc19|nda1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518287	2541213	2540244	277727	276776	SPBC887.14c	SPBC336.01	pfh1	fbh1	pif1	fdh|fdh1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518288	2541213	2538994	277727	275568	SPBC887.14c	SPCC553.01c	pfh1	dbl2	pif1	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518289	2541213	2540627	277727	277153	SPBC887.14c	SPBC25H2.13c	pfh1	cdc20	pif1	pol2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518290	2541213	3361541	277727	280617	SPBC887.14c	SPAC167.05	pfh1	SPAC167.05	pif1	SPAC57A7.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518291	2541213	2543668	277727	280082	SPBC887.14c	SPAC9.05	pfh1	fml1	pif1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518292	2541213	2539164	277727	275735	SPBC887.14c	SPCC16A11.17	pfh1	mcm4	pif1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518293	2541213	2540630	277727	277156	SPBC887.14c	SPBC25D12.03c	pfh1	mcm7	pif1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518294	2541213	2540695	277727	277219	SPBC887.14c	SPBC19G7.01c	pfh1	msh2	pif1	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518295	2541213	2540020	277727	276564	SPBC887.14c	SPBC16D10.09	pfh1	pcn1	pif1	pcn	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518296	2541213	2541045	277727	277560	SPBC887.14c	SPBC543.03c	pfh1	pku80	pif1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518297	2541213	2540719	277727	277242	SPBC887.14c	SPBC216.05	pfh1	rad3	pif1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518298	2541213	2542729	277727	279179	SPBC887.14c	SPAC26A3.03c	pfh1	rmi1	pif1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518299	2541213	2540510	277727	277038	SPBC887.14c	SPBC2G5.07c	pfh1	rpc25	pif1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518300	2541213	2543417	277727	279839	SPBC887.14c	SPAPB1E7.03	pfh1	rpc82	pif1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518301	2541213	2541690	277727	278186	SPBC887.14c	SPAC1556.02c	pfh1	sdh1	pif1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518302	2541213	2541158	277727	277673	SPBC887.14c	SPBC660.13c	pfh1	ssb1	pif1	rad11|rpa1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518303	2541213	2542619	277727	279073	SPBC887.14c	SPAC6G10.02c	pfh1	tea3	pif1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518304	2541213	2540692	277727	277217	SPBC887.14c	SPBC800.07c	pfh1	tsf1	pif1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518305	2541213	2541054	277727	277569	SPBC887.14c	SPBC3B8.08	pfh1	SPBC3B8.08	pif1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518306	2541213	2539971	277727	276515	SPBC887.14c	SPBC1105.04c	pfh1	cbp1	pif1	abp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	McDonald KR (2016)	27611590	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518307	2543470	2540856	279890	277373	SPAC688.07c	SPBC4F6.12	SPAC688.07c	pxl1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Liu Y (2016)	27385337	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518308	2543470	2540660	279890	277185	SPAC688.07c	SPBC21.06c	SPAC688.07c	cdc7	-	its10|pld1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Liu Y (2016)	27385337	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518309	2540635	2541612	277161	278109	SPBC23G7.08c	SPAC1F7.04	rga7	rho1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Liu Y (2016)	27385337	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518310	2540635	2542617	277161	279071	SPBC23G7.08c	SPAC13A11.01c	rga7	rga8	-	SPAC2F7.18c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Liu Y (2016)	27385337	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518311	2540635	2539513	277161	276075	SPBC23G7.08c	SPCC645.05c	rga7	myo2	-	rng5	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Liu Y (2016)	27385337	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518312	2540635	2540856	277161	277373	SPBC23G7.08c	SPBC4F6.12	rga7	pxl1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Liu Y (2016)	27385337	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518313	2540635	2540742	277161	277265	SPBC23G7.08c	SPBC19G7.08c	rga7	art1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Liu Y (2016)	27385337	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518314	2540635	2539513	277161	276075	SPBC23G7.08c	SPCC645.05c	rga7	myo2	-	rng5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Liu Y (2016)	27385337	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518315	2540635	2540660	277161	277185	SPBC23G7.08c	SPBC21.06c	rga7	cdc7	-	its10|pld1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Liu Y (2016)	27385337	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2518403	2541319	2541661	277831	278157	SPBP4H10.06c	SPAC6G10.12c	cut14	ace2	smc2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kim KD (2016)	27548313	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2518404	2541319	2539242	277831	275812	SPBP4H10.06c	SPCC290.04	cut14	ams2	smc2	SPCC4F11.01	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kim KD (2016)	27548313	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2518407	2541661	2541319	278157	277831	SPAC6G10.12c	SPBP4H10.06c	ace2	cut14	-	smc2	Co-localization	physical	Kim KD (2016)	27548313	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2518408	2539242	2541319	275812	277831	SPCC290.04	SPBP4H10.06c	ams2	cut14	SPCC4F11.01	smc2	Co-localization	physical	Kim KD (2016)	27548313	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2518845	2540936	2539864	277452	276411	SPBC800.05c	SPBC16A3.15c	atb2	nda2	alp2|ban5|tub1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Radcliffe P (1998)	9658169	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
2518846	2540936	2540582	277452	277108	SPBC800.05c	SPBC26H8.07c	atb2	nda3	alp2|ban5|tub1	alp12|ben1	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Radcliffe P (1998)	9658169	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
2518847	2540936	2540582	277452	277108	SPBC800.05c	SPBC26H8.07c	atb2	nda3	alp2|ban5|tub1	alp12|ben1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Radcliffe P (1998)	9658169	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viable	-	-	BIOGRID
2518848	2540582	2539864	277108	276411	SPBC26H8.07c	SPBC16A3.15c	nda3	nda2	alp12|ben1	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Radcliffe P (1998)	9658169	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
2518849	2539869	2539197	276415	275768	SPBC11B10.09	SPCC24B10.14c	cdc2	xlf1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	mug104|nej1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Hentges P (2014)	25533340	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2521177	2540112	2541699	276649	278195	SPBC11C11.02	SPAP8A3.08	imp2	cdc4	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Demeter J (1998)	9786952	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2521178	2540112	2541975	276649	278460	SPBC11C11.02	SPAC20G8.05c	imp2	cdc15	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Demeter J (1998)	9786952	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2521179	2541503	2539688	278005	276243	SPAC22A12.01c	SPBC146.06c	pso2	fan1	SPAC56F8.17c|snm1	SPBC146.06c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gwon GH (2014)	25319828	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	sensitivity to cisplatin	-	BIOGRID
2521662	55629	2542503	120768	278961	RP11-4M23.5	SPAC19A8.12	PNRC2	dcp2	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Mugridge JS (2016)	27694842	9606	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2521663	55629	2541033	120768	277548	RP11-4M23.5	SPBC3B9.21	PNRC2	dcp1	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Mugridge JS (2016)	27694842	9606	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2521664	2543035	2543622	279470	280036	SPAC343.14c	SPAC4D7.09	SPAC343.14c	tif223	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kashiwagi K (2016)	26901872	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2521903	2541933	2541933	278421	278421	SPAC2F3.04c	SPAC2F3.04c	rim1	rim1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Singh SP (2019)	30617184	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2524017	2542910	2539268	279353	275838	SPAC1486.03c	SPCC10H11.02	SPAC1486.03c	cwf23	-	SPCP31B10.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Raut S (2018)	30467716	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2524018	2542910	2540057	279353	276595	SPAC1486.03c	SPBC16H5.10c	SPAC1486.03c	prp43	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Raut S (2018)	30467716	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529898	2543058	2538752	279492	275335	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC830.11c	rpn15	fap7	dss1|sem1	SPCC830.11c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529899	2543058	2538753	279492	275336	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC1281.06c	rpn15	SPCC1281.06c	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529900	2543058	2538775	279492	275357	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC23B6.05c	rpn15	ssb3	dss1|sem1	rpa3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529901	2543058	2538781	279492	275362	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC1753.01c	rpn15	ssb2	dss1|sem1	SPCC584.06c|rpa2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529902	2543058	2538846	279492	275427	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC1919.10c	rpn15	myo52	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529903	2543058	2538862	279492	275442	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC338.10c	rpn15	cox5	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529904	2543058	2538900	279492	275478	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC1827.01c	rpn15	utp25	dss1|sem1	SPCC1827.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529905	2543058	2538912	279492	275489	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC1682.10	rpn15	rpn8	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529906	2543058	2538983	279492	275557	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC613.10	rpn15	qcr2	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529907	2543058	2538986	279492	275560	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC895.06	rpn15	elp2	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529908	2543058	2538987	279492	275561	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC11E10.06c	rpn15	elp4	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529909	2543058	2538999	279492	275573	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC162.09c	rpn15	hmg1	dss1|sem1	its12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529910	2543058	2539026	279492	275599	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC1442.06	rpn15	pre8	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529911	2543058	2539048	279492	275621	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC1223.08c	rpn15	dfr1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529912	2543058	2539059	279492	275632	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC737.06c	rpn15	SPCC737.06c	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529913	2543058	2539067	279492	275639	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC576.08c	rpn15	rps2	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529914	2543058	2539130	279492	275702	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC1919.03c	rpn15	amk2	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529915	2543058	2539147	279492	275719	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC622.12c	rpn15	gdh1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529916	2543058	2539153	279492	275725	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC1682.01	rpn15	qcr9	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529917	2543058	2539182	279492	275753	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC16A11.16c	rpn15	rpn1302	dss1|sem1	rpn13|rpn13b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529918	2543058	2539189	279492	275760	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC1682.16	rpn15	rpt4	dss1|sem1	SPCC306.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529919	2543058	2539211	279492	275781	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC1739.08c	rpn15	SPCC1739.08c	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529920	2543058	2539265	279492	275835	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC553.06	rpn15	swp1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529921	2543058	2539284	279492	275852	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC584.15c	rpn15	SPCC584.15c	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529922	2543058	2539294	279492	275862	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC1620.09c	rpn15	tfg1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529923	2543058	2539350	279492	275916	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC24B10.17	rpn15	emp24	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529924	2543058	2539366	279492	275932	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC16C4.11	rpn15	pef1	dss1|sem1	p31	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529925	2543058	2539378	279492	275944	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC1795.04c	rpn15	pre10	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529926	2543058	2539400	279492	275965	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC663.02	rpn15	wtf14	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529927	2543058	2539401	279492	275966	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC63.12c	rpn15	pup3	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529928	2543058	2539403	279492	275968	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC736.11	rpn15	ago1	dss1|sem1	csp9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529929	2543058	2539421	279492	275986	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC794.11c	rpn15	ent3	dss1|sem1	SPCC794.11c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529930	2543058	2539466	279492	276029	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC757.03c	rpn15	hsp3101	dss1|sem1	SPCC757.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529931	2543058	2539467	279492	276030	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC417.07c	rpn15	mto1	dss1|sem1	mbo1|mod20	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529932	2543058	2539488	279492	276051	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC645.08c	rpn15	snd1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529933	2543058	2539520	279492	276082	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC338.15	rpn15	wbp1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529934	2543058	2539522	279492	276084	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC576.07	rpn15	ret3	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529935	2543058	2539523	279492	276085	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC622.09	rpn15	htb1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529936	2543058	2539538	279492	276100	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC364.06	rpn15	nap1	dss1|sem1	nap11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529937	2543058	2539539	279492	276101	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC576.10c	rpn15	rpt3	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529938	2543058	2539561	279492	276122	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC576.05	rpn15	sac3	dss1|sem1	SPCC576.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529939	2543058	2539607	279492	276165	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC11G11.06c	rpn15	sme1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529940	2543058	2539616	279492	276174	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC17G9.02c	rpn15	cdc73	dss1|sem1	SPBC17G9.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529941	2543058	2539636	279492	276192	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC14C8.02	rpn15	tim44	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529942	2543058	2539639	279492	276194	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC106.09	rpn15	cut4	dss1|sem1	apc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529943	2543058	2539643	279492	276198	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC1685.09	rpn15	rps29	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529944	2543058	2539652	279492	276207	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC1703.13c	rpn15	SPBC1703.13c	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529945	2543058	2539679	279492	276234	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC12C2.05c	rpn15	bzz1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529946	2543058	2539712	279492	276265	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC146.01	rpn15	med15	dss1|sem1	SPBP35G2.15	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529947	2543058	2539726	279492	276278	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC13E7.08c	rpn15	leo1	dss1|sem1	SPBC13E7.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529948	2543058	2539727	279492	276279	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC1685.13	rpn15	fhn1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529949	2543058	2539732	279492	276284	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC1604.07	rpn15	atp4	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529950	2543058	2539790	279492	276340	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC13G1.13	rpn15	tfb2	dss1|sem1	SPBC31F10.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529951	2543058	2539794	279492	276344	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC14C8.12	rpn15	rpb8	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529952	2543058	2539807	279492	276357	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC1778.10c	rpn15	ppk21	dss1|sem1	SPBC4C3.11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529953	2543058	2539826	279492	276375	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC119.06	rpn15	sco1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529954	2543058	2539862	279492	276409	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC16C6.07c	rpn15	rpt1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529955	2543058	2539879	279492	276425	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC1703.07	rpn15	SPBC1703.07	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529956	2543058	2539907	279492	276453	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC1198.04c	rpn15	zas1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529957	2543058	2539915	279492	276459	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC16A3.14	rpn15	SPBC16A3.14	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529958	2543058	2539923	279492	276467	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC1539.04	rpn15	tts1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529959	2543058	2539925	279492	276469	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC16H5.13	rpn15	SPBC16H5.13	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529960	2543058	2539938	279492	276482	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC17D11.05	rpn15	tif32	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529961	2543058	2539943	279492	276487	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC14F5.05c	rpn15	sam1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529962	2543058	2539969	279492	276513	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC1685.10	rpn15	rps27	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529963	2543058	2539978	279492	276522	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC11C11.06c	rpn15	SPBC11C11.06c	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529964	2543058	2539985	279492	276529	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC14F5.09c	rpn15	ade8	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529965	2543058	2539996	279492	276540	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC119.07	rpn15	ppk19	dss1|sem1	vps15	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529966	2543058	2540002	279492	276546	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC14C8.06	rpn15	arc1	dss1|sem1	sop2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529967	2543058	2540003	279492	276547	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC1105.07c	rpn15	SPBC1105.07c	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529968	2543058	2540009	279492	276553	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC16G5.05c	rpn15	scs2	dss1|sem1	SPBC16G5.05c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529969	2543058	2540014	279492	276558	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC1718.05	rpn15	trs31	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529970	2543058	2540025	279492	276569	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC16G5.01	rpn15	rpn12	dss1|sem1	SPBC342.07|mts3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529971	2543058	2540029	279492	276573	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC16A3.01	rpn15	spn3	dss1|sem1	SPBC543.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529972	2543058	2540059	279492	276597	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC1198.01	rpn15	fmd2	dss1|sem1	SPBC1198.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529973	2543058	2540083	279492	276621	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC119.02	rpn15	ubc4	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529974	2543058	2540109	279492	276646	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC119.01	rpn15	rpn3	dss1|sem1	SPBPJ4664.07	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529975	2543058	2540144	279492	276681	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC1778.08c	rpn15	arc3	dss1|sem1	arc21	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529976	2543058	2540175	279492	276708	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC106.16	rpn15	pre6	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529977	2543058	2540191	279492	276724	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC17D11.07c	rpn15	rpn2	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529978	2543058	2540206	279492	276739	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC1271.12	rpn15	kes1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529979	2543058	2540222	279492	276755	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC32F12.03c	rpn15	gpx1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529980	2543058	2540271	279492	276802	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC30D10.08	rpn15	mgm101	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529981	2543058	2540273	279492	276804	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC30D10.13c	rpn15	pdb1	dss1|sem1	agg1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529982	2543058	2540283	279492	276814	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC1A4.02c	rpn15	leu1	dss1|sem1	SPBC1E8.07c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529983	2543058	2540292	279492	276823	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC28F2.12	rpn15	rpb1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529984	2543058	2540300	279492	276831	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC2G2.08	rpn15	ade9	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529985	2543058	2540306	279492	276836	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC2G5.02c	rpn15	ckb2	dss1|sem1	SPBC2G5.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529986	2543058	2540307	279492	276837	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC1A4.01	rpn15	apc10	dss1|sem1	SPBC1E8.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529987	2543058	2540317	279492	276847	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC24C6.05	rpn15	sec28	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529988	2543058	2540320	279492	276850	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC3D6.04c	rpn15	mad1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529989	2543058	2540326	279492	276856	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC2G5.06c	rpn15	hmt2	dss1|sem1	cad1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529990	2543058	2540327	279492	276857	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC31F10.07	rpn15	lsb5	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529991	2543058	2540375	279492	276904	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC2G2.06c	rpn15	apl1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529992	2543058	2540376	279492	276905	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC26H8.11c	rpn15	SPBC26H8.11c	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529993	2543058	2540393	279492	276921	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC19F5.03	rpn15	sac11	dss1|sem1	SPBC19F5.03	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529994	2543058	2540409	279492	276937	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC2D10.11c	rpn15	nap2	dss1|sem1	nap1.2|nap12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529995	2543058	2540452	279492	276980	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC2A9.11c	rpn15	iss9	dss1|sem1	SPBC2A9.11c|SPBC2D10.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529996	2543058	2540521	279492	277049	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC25H2.07	rpn15	tif11	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529997	2543058	2540533	279492	277061	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC29A10.16c	rpn15	SPBC29A10.16c	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529998	2543058	2540535	279492	277062	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC215.01	rpn15	SPBC215.01	dss1|sem1	SPBC3B9.20	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2529999	2543058	2540539	279492	277066	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC211.01	rpn15	rsm10	dss1|sem1	SPBC23E6.11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530000	2543058	2540564	279492	277091	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC530.03c	rpn15	bag102	dss1|sem1	bag1-b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530001	2543058	2540578	279492	277104	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC26H8.06	rpn15	grx4	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530002	2543058	2540590	279492	277116	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC27B12.14	rpn15	SPBC27B12.14	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530003	2543058	2540622	279492	277148	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC21C3.05	rpn15	sap62	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530004	2543058	2540672	279492	277197	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC23G7.05	rpn15	sui1	dss1|sem1	psu1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530005	2543058	2540716	279492	277239	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC215.15	rpn15	sec13	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530006	2543058	2540728	279492	277251	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC216.06c	rpn15	swi1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530007	2543058	2540731	279492	277254	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC18H10.02	rpn15	lcf1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530008	2543058	2540761	279492	277281	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC21.04	rpn15	med8	dss1|sem1	sep15	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530009	2543058	2540790	279492	277309	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC6B1.05c	rpn15	atg7	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530010	2543058	2540794	279492	277313	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC582.07c	rpn15	rpn7	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530011	2543058	2540806	279492	277325	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC18E5.06	rpn15	rps21	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530012	2543058	2540819	279492	277337	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC18H10.03	rpn15	tif35	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530013	2543058	2540821	279492	277339	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC800.03	rpn15	clr3	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530014	2543058	2540831	279492	277349	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC428.02c	rpn15	eca39	dss1|sem1	SPBC582.12c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530015	2543058	2540838	279492	277356	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC609.01	rpn15	SPBC609.01	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530016	2543058	2540845	279492	277362	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC428.13c	rpn15	mob1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530017	2543058	2540864	279492	277381	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC577.07	rpn15	ubp10	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530018	2543058	2540875	279492	277392	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC577.10	rpn15	pre4	dss1|sem1	SPBC577.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530019	2543058	2540878	279492	277395	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC4C3.10c	rpn15	pre3	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530020	2543058	2540896	279492	277412	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC19C2.13c	rpn15	ctu2	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530021	2543058	2540900	279492	277416	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC530.10c	rpn15	anc1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530022	2543058	2540917	279492	277433	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC409.05	rpn15	skp1	dss1|sem1	psh1|sph1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530023	2543058	2540956	279492	277472	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC409.06	rpn15	uch2	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530024	2543058	2540959	279492	277475	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC365.12c	rpn15	ish1	dss1|sem1	isp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530025	2543058	2540976	279492	277492	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC3B9.12	rpn15	trs23	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530026	2543058	2540977	279492	277493	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC3E7.02c	rpn15	hsp16	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530027	2543058	2540979	279492	277495	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC3H7.10	rpn15	elp6	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530028	2543058	2540980	279492	277496	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC342.04	rpn15	rpn1301	dss1|sem1	rpn13|rpn13a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530029	2543058	2540995	279492	277511	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC337.16	rpn15	cho1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530030	2543058	2541002	279492	277517	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC3E7.07c	rpn15	SPBC3E7.07c	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530031	2543058	2541011	279492	277526	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC337.14	rpn15	rpb4	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530032	2543058	2541026	279492	277541	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC337.09	rpn15	erg28	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530033	2543058	2541028	279492	277543	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC577.08c	rpn15	txl1	dss1|sem1	trx3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530034	2543058	2541043	279492	277558	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC409.21	rpn15	sec66	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530035	2543058	2541073	279492	277588	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC543.04	rpn15	SPBC543.04	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530036	2543058	2541076	279492	277591	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC4.02c	rpn15	SPBC4.02c	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530037	2543058	2541089	279492	277604	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC646.09c	rpn15	int6	dss1|sem1	yin6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530038	2543058	2541096	279492	277611	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC725.10	rpn15	SPBC725.10	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530039	2543058	2541139	279492	277654	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC646.16	rpn15	scl1	dss1|sem1	SPBC646.16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530040	2543058	2541146	279492	277661	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC660.16	rpn15	SPBC660.16	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530041	2543058	2541158	279492	277673	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC660.13c	rpn15	ssb1	dss1|sem1	rad11|rpa1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530042	2543058	2541160	279492	277675	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC725.09c	rpn15	hob3	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530043	2543058	2541162	279492	277677	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC691.03c	rpn15	apl3	dss1|sem1	pi033|SPACTOKYO_453.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530044	2543058	2541183	279492	277697	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC725.14	rpn15	arg6	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530045	2543058	2541188	279492	277702	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC83.16c	rpn15	SPBC83.16c	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530046	2543058	2541214	279492	277728	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC839.07	rpn15	ibp1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530047	2543058	2541217	279492	277731	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC839.16	rpn15	thf1	dss1|sem1	SPBC839.16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530048	2543058	2541219	279492	277733	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC8D2.09c	rpn15	msl1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530049	2543058	2541260	279492	277774	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC902.05c	rpn15	idh2	dss1|sem1	glu2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530050	2543058	2541265	279492	277779	SPAC3G6.02	SPBP16F5.03c	rpn15	tra1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530051	2543058	2541296	279492	277808	SPAC3G6.02	SPBP8B7.06	rpn15	rpp201	dss1|sem1	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530052	2543058	2541324	279492	277836	SPAC3G6.02	SPBP23A10.09	rpn15	psf1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530053	2543058	2541347	279492	277858	SPAC3G6.02	SPBP8B7.14c	rpn15	dpb2	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530054	2543058	2541386	279492	277897	SPAC3G6.02	SPBP8B7.24c	rpn15	atg8	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530055	2543058	2541395	279492	277904	SPAC3G6.02	SPBP8B7.25	rpn15	cyp4	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530056	2543058	2541412	279492	277920	SPAC3G6.02	SPBPJ4664.04	rpn15	SPBPJ4664.04	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530057	2543058	2541446	279492	277951	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC23G3.01	rpn15	rpb2	dss1|sem1	SPAC521.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530058	2543058	2541455	279492	277958	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC6G9.06c	rpn15	pcp1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530059	2543058	2541502	279492	278004	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC23D3.04c	rpn15	gpd2	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530060	2543058	2541509	279492	278011	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC6G9.05	rpn15	pcd1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530061	2543058	2541527	279492	278027	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC31A2.09c	rpn15	apm4	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530062	2543058	2541562	279492	278061	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC24B11.05	rpn15	SPAC24B11.05	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530063	2543058	2541582	279492	278079	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC29E6.08	rpn15	tbp1	dss1|sem1	SPAC30.12|tbp|tdf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530064	2543058	2541592	279492	278089	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC6F12.15c	rpn15	cut9	dss1|sem1	dre1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530065	2543058	2541599	279492	278096	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC24B11.11c	rpn15	sid2	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530066	2543058	2541612	279492	278109	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC1F7.04	rpn15	rho1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530067	2543058	2541614	279492	278111	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC29A4.20	rpn15	elp3	dss1|sem1	kat9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530068	2543058	2541636	279492	278132	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC27F1.07	rpn15	ost1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530069	2543058	2541644	279492	278140	SPAC3G6.02	SPAP11E10.01	rpn15	SPAP11E10.01	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530070	2543058	2541700	279492	278196	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC32A11.02c	rpn15	SPAC32A11.02c	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530071	2543058	2541713	279492	278208	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC3A12.12	rpn15	atp11	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530072	2543058	2541731	279492	278225	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC6G9.11	rpn15	syb1	dss1|sem1	snc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530073	2543058	2541769	279492	278263	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC22F3.05c	rpn15	alp41	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530074	2543058	2541779	279492	278272	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC23H4.15	rpn15	tsr1	dss1|sem1	SPAC23H4.15	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530075	2543058	2541782	279492	278275	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC23H4.03c	rpn15	erv25	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530076	2543058	2541784	279492	278277	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC2E1P3.01	rpn15	SPAC2E1P3.01	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530077	2543058	2541805	279492	278296	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC23D3.07	rpn15	pup1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530078	2543058	2541807	279492	278298	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC23G3.11	rpn15	rpn6	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530079	2543058	2541811	279492	278302	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC22A12.16	rpn15	SPAC22A12.16	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530080	2543058	2541819	279492	278310	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC6G9.08	rpn15	ubp6	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530081	2543058	2541891	279492	278381	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC1F8.03c	rpn15	str3	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530082	2543058	2541903	279492	278393	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC22F8.05	rpn15	SPAC22F8.05	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530083	2543058	2541910	279492	278400	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC23C4.15	rpn15	rpb5	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530084	2543058	2541925	279492	278413	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC5D6.05	rpn15	med18	dss1|sem1	sep11|pmc6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530085	2543058	2541929	279492	278417	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC23C4.12	rpn15	hhp2	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530086	2543058	2541933	279492	278421	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC2F3.04c	rpn15	rim1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530087	2543058	2541972	279492	278457	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC23C11.11	rpn15	cka1	dss1|sem1	orb5	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530088	2543058	2541985	279492	278470	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC20G8.04c	rpn15	SPAC20G8.04c	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530089	2543058	2542020	279492	278503	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC5D6.09c	rpn15	mug86	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530090	2543058	2542022	279492	278505	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC23A1.03	rpn15	apt1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530091	2543058	2542051	279492	278530	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC23C11.06c	rpn15	SPAC23C11.06c	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530092	2543058	2542062	279492	278540	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC22F8.06	rpn15	pam1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530093	2543058	2542077	279492	278554	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC27D7.14c	rpn15	tpr1	dss1|sem1	SPAC637.02c|ctr9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530094	2543058	2542090	279492	278567	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC25G10.08	rpn15	SPAC25G10.08	dss1|sem1	p116	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530095	2543058	2542094	279492	278571	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC29B12.06c	rpn15	rcd1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530096	2543058	2542100	279492	278576	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC26F1.04c	rpn15	etr1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530097	2543058	2542107	279492	278583	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC30.01c	rpn15	sec72	dss1|sem1	sec7b|sec702	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530098	2543058	2542115	279492	278591	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC1834.02	rpn15	aro1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530099	2543058	2542127	279492	278603	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC1952.12c	rpn15	csn71	dss1|sem1	csn7|csn7a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530100	2543058	2542179	279492	278654	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC17C9.12	rpn15	scs22	dss1|sem1	SPAC17C9.12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530101	2543058	2542185	279492	278660	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC18G6.01c	rpn15	SPAC18G6.01c	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530102	2543058	2542193	279492	278668	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC9G1.11c	rpn15	spn4	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530103	2543058	2542206	279492	278681	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC17A2.05	rpn15	osm1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530104	2543058	2542211	279492	278685	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC27D7.05c	rpn15	apc14	dss1|sem1	omt1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530105	2543058	2542219	279492	278693	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC18G6.03	rpn15	ypt3	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530106	2543058	2542222	279492	278695	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC31G5.18c	rpn15	sde2	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530107	2543058	2542226	279492	278699	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC19G12.06c	rpn15	hta2	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530108	2543058	2542246	279492	278716	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC17H9.12c	rpn15	SPAC17H9.12c	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530109	2543058	2542252	279492	278722	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC17A2.13c	rpn15	rad25	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530110	2543058	2542269	279492	278738	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC1F12.07	rpn15	SPAC1F12.07	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530111	2543058	2542275	279492	278744	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC17G8.04c	rpn15	arc5	dss1|sem1	arc15	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530112	2543058	2542276	279492	278745	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC17H9.16	rpn15	tom22	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530113	2543058	2542285	279492	278753	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC17H9.09c	rpn15	ras1	dss1|sem1	ste5	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530114	2543058	2542287	279492	278755	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC6F6.10c	rpn15	arc2	dss1|sem1	arc34	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530115	2543058	2542336	279492	278802	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC16E8.11c	rpn15	tfb1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530116	2543058	2542409	279492	278873	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC17G8.10c	rpn15	dma1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530117	2543058	2542438	279492	278900	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC17C9.01c	rpn15	nuc2	dss1|sem1	SPAC1851.01|apc3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530118	2543058	2542443	279492	278905	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC17G6.13	rpn15	slt1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530119	2543058	2542469	279492	278930	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC19A8.04	rpn15	erg5	dss1|sem1	cyp61	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530120	2543058	2542474	279492	278934	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC31G5.09c	rpn15	spk1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530121	2543058	2542493	279492	278952	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC1B2.04	rpn15	cox6	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530122	2543058	2542528	279492	278986	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC1B3.08	rpn15	SPAC1B3.08	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530123	2543058	2542533	279492	278991	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC1B1.02c	rpn15	SPAC1B1.02c	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530124	2543058	2542537	279492	278994	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC19D5.04	rpn15	ptr1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530125	2543058	2542540	279492	278997	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC19D5.06c	rpn15	din1	dss1|sem1	rai1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530126	2543058	2542553	279492	279010	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC18G6.14c	rpn15	rps7	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530127	2543058	2542559	279492	279015	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC6G10.04c	rpn15	pre5	dss1|sem1	SPAC6G10.04c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530128	2543058	2542564	279492	279020	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC1851.03	rpn15	ckb1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530129	2543058	2542577	279492	279033	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC19G12.15c	rpn15	tpp1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530130	2543058	2542598	279492	279052	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC6G10.08	rpn15	idp1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530131	2543058	2542609	279492	279063	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC31G5.04	rpn15	lys12	dss1|sem1	SPAC31G5.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530132	2543058	2542615	279492	279069	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC19G12.01c	rpn15	cut20	dss1|sem1	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530133	2543058	2542631	279492	279085	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC24H6.10c	rpn15	SPAC24H6.10c	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530134	2543058	2542638	279492	279092	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC1250.01	rpn15	snf21	dss1|sem1	SPAC29A4.21|brg1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530135	2543058	2542651	279492	279105	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC24C9.12c	rpn15	SPAC24C9.12c	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530136	2543058	2542660	279492	279113	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC328.03	rpn15	tps1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530137	2543058	2542674	279492	279127	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC26A3.12c	rpn15	dhp1	dss1|sem1	rat1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530138	2543058	2542750	279492	279200	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC1635.01	rpn15	SPAC1635.01	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530139	2543058	2542758	279492	279208	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC15E1.02c	rpn15	SPAC15E1.02c	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530140	2543058	2542770	279492	279220	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC167.07c	rpn15	hul5	dss1|sem1	SPAC167.07c|SPAC57A7.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530141	2543058	2542817	279492	279264	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC13G6.02c	rpn15	rps101	dss1|sem1	rps1-1|rps3a-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530142	2543058	2542828	279492	279275	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC13G6.06c	rpn15	gcv2	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530143	2543058	2542880	279492	279325	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC6F12.14	rpn15	cut23	dss1|sem1	apc8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530144	2543058	2542883	279492	279328	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC1486.04c	rpn15	alm1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530145	2543058	2542919	279492	279360	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC6C3.08	rpn15	nas6	dss1|sem1	SPAC6C3.08	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530146	2543058	2542931	279492	279372	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC1071.11	rpn15	SPAC1071.11	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530147	2543058	2542940	279492	279381	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC31A2.12	rpn15	SPAC31A2.12	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530148	2543058	2542978	279492	279416	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC10F6.02c	rpn15	prp22	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530149	2543058	2543002	279492	279440	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC10F6.17c	rpn15	SPAC10F6.17c	dss1|sem1	SPAC56E4.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530150	2543058	2543004	279492	279442	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC12B10.02c	rpn15	SPAC12B10.02c	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530151	2543058	2543040	279492	279475	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC31G5.13	rpn15	rpn11	dss1|sem1	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530152	2543058	2543080	279492	279513	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC3A11.10c	rpn15	SPAC3A11.10c	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530153	2543058	2543109	279492	279541	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC3G6.09c	rpn15	tps2	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530154	2543058	2543114	279492	279546	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC607.05	rpn15	rpn9	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530155	2543058	2543121	279492	279553	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC31G5.16c	rpn15	dpm1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530156	2543058	2543122	279492	279554	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC31A2.04c	rpn15	pre1	dss1|sem1	SPAC31A2.04c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530157	2543058	2543178	279492	279608	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC31G5.15	rpn15	psd3	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530158	2543058	2543205	279492	279634	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC323.02c	rpn15	pup2	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530159	2543058	2543207	279492	279636	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC3C7.13c	rpn15	SPAC3C7.13c	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530160	2543058	2543243	279492	279671	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC869.07c	rpn15	mel1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530161	2543058	2543283	279492	279709	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC6C3.04	rpn15	cit1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530162	2543058	2543291	279492	279716	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC9E9.04	rpn15	SPAC9E9.04	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530163	2543058	2543304	279492	279728	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC6B12.12	rpn15	tom70	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530164	2543058	2543307	279492	279731	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC694.05c	rpn15	rps2502	dss1|sem1	rps25|rps25-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530165	2543058	2543333	279492	279756	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC694.02	rpn15	SPAC694.02	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530166	2543058	2543340	279492	279763	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC637.03	rpn15	SPAC637.03	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530167	2543058	2543352	279492	279774	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC56E4.02c	rpn15	alg13	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530168	2543058	2543355	279492	279777	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC959.09c	rpn15	apc5	dss1|sem1	SPAP32A8.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530169	2543058	2543371	279492	279793	SPAC3G6.02	SPAPB1A10.06c	rpn15	SPAPB1A10.06c	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530170	2543058	2543390	279492	279812	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC631.01c	rpn15	acp2	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530171	2543058	2543400	279492	279822	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC3G9.11c	rpn15	SPAC3G9.11c	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530172	2543058	2543410	279492	279832	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC821.11	rpn15	pro1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530173	2543058	2543412	279492	279834	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC637.07	rpn15	moe1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530174	2543058	2543415	279492	279837	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC4H3.13	rpn15	pcc1	dss1|sem1	SPAC4H3.13	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530175	2543058	2543461	279492	279881	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC521.03	rpn15	SPAC521.03	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530176	2543058	2543480	279492	279900	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC688.03c	rpn15	SPAC688.03c	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530177	2543058	2543497	279492	279916	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC926.09c	rpn15	fas1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530178	2543058	2543509	279492	279927	SPAC3G6.02	SPAPB1E7.07	rpn15	glt1	dss1|sem1	gog1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530179	2543058	2543513	279492	279931	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC821.06	rpn15	spn2	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530180	2543058	2543516	279492	279934	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC4F10.11	rpn15	spn1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530181	2543058	2543517	279492	279935	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC3G9.05	rpn15	spa2	dss1|sem1	SPAC3G9.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530182	2543058	2543526	279492	279944	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC4A8.15c	rpn15	cdc3	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530183	2543058	2543531	279492	279949	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC926.06c	rpn15	SPAC926.06c	dss1|sem1	lrr1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530184	2543058	2543537	279492	279954	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC4D7.05	rpn15	sum1	dss1|sem1	tif34	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530185	2543058	2543560	279492	279976	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC664.03	rpn15	paf1	dss1|sem1	SPAC664.03	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530186	2543058	2543570	279492	279985	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC644.18c	rpn15	bet3	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530187	2543058	2543618	279492	280032	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC4A8.11c	rpn15	fas2	dss1|sem1	lsd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530188	2543058	2543623	279492	280037	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC4A8.13c	rpn15	pts1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530189	2543058	2543626	279492	280040	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC4D7.08c	rpn15	ade4	dss1|sem1	aza1|min13	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530190	2543058	2543633	279492	280047	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC3H8.05c	rpn15	mms1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530191	2543058	2543637	279492	280051	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC3H8.02	rpn15	csr102	dss1|sem1	SPAC3H8.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530192	2543058	2543682	279492	280096	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC637.10c	rpn15	rpn10	dss1|sem1	pus1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530193	2543058	3361269	279492	280345	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC31A8.01c	rpn15	rtn1	dss1|sem1	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530194	2543058	3361354	279492	280430	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC56F2.12	rpn15	ilv5	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530195	2543058	3361455	279492	280531	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC1782.01	rpn15	ecm29	dss1|sem1	SPAPYUG7.07	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530196	2543058	3361484	279492	280560	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC1A6.02	rpn15	SPAC1A6.02	dss1|sem1	SPAC23C4.21	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530197	2543058	3361518	279492	280594	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC13C5.01c	rpn15	pre9	dss1|sem1	SPAC13C5.01c|SPAC31A2.17c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530198	2543058	5802702	279492	857840	SPAC3G6.02	SPCC1235.15	rpn15	dga1	dss1|sem1	SPCC548.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530199	2543058	5802929	279492	858067	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC1556.08c	rpn15	cbs2	dss1|sem1	SPAC1F12.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530200	2543058	2540209	279492	276742	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC1604.10	rpn15	srb7	dss1|sem1	med21	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530201	2543058	2540314	279492	276844	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC2G5.03	rpn15	ctu1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530202	2543058	2540415	279492	276943	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC30B4.06c	rpn15	SPBC30B4.06c	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530203	2543058	2540817	279492	277335	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC3H5.05c	rpn15	rps1401	dss1|sem1	rps14|rps14-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530204	2543058	2540868	279492	277385	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC4C3.07	rpn15	SPBC4C3.07	dss1|sem1	csn6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530205	2543058	2541152	279492	277667	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC713.10	rpn15	tim16	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530206	2543058	2541258	279492	277772	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC8E4.01c	rpn15	SPBC8E4.01c	dss1|sem1	SPBP4G3.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530207	2543058	2541595	279492	278092	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC1565.01	rpn15	SPAC1565.01	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530208	2543058	2543070	279492	279503	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC2H10.02c	rpn15	SPAC2H10.02c	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530209	2543058	2543153	279492	279585	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC821.05	rpn15	SPAC821.05	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2530210	2543058	5802781	279492	857919	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC18H10.13	rpn15	rps1402	dss1|sem1	rps14-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2532606	2538720	2542925	275304	279366	SPCC338.05c	SPAC11E3.04c	mms2	ubc13	spm2	spu13|sst5	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Frampton J (2006)	16641370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2532658	2540744	2539190	277267	275761	SPBC1604.21c	SPCC1259.15c	ptr3	ubc11	SPBC211.09|uba1	ubcdp|ubcp4	Biochemical Activity	physical	Horikoshi Y (2013)	23442800	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	ubiquitin transthiolation	-	BIOGRID
2534997	2540234	2542824	276766	279271	SPBC336.12c	SPAC144.13c	cdc10	srw1	-	ste9	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kitamura K (1998)	9571240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|viability	genetic complex|overexpression of swr1 suppresses the growth defects of a rum1/cdc10 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
2534999	2539869	2542824	276415	279271	SPBC11B10.09	SPAC144.13c	cdc2	srw1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	ste9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Kitamura K (1998)	9571240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	mutation of ste9 prevents diploidization in a cdc2 temperature sensitive mutant upon return to permissive temp	-	BIOGRID
2535000	2539123	2542824	275695	279271	SPCC18B5.03	SPAC144.13c	wee1	srw1	-	ste9	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kitamura K (1998)	9571240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	genetic complex|overexpression of ste9 partially rescues the lethality of a rum1/wee1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
2535003	2539640	2542824	276195	279271	SPBC32F12.09	SPAC144.13c	rum1	srw1	-	ste9	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kitamura K (1998)	9571240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|viability	genetic complex|overexpression of srw1 suppresses the growth defects of a rum1/cdc10 double mutant|overexpression of ste9 partially rescues the lethality of a rum1/wee1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
2544030	2541605	2542070	278102	278547	SPAC1F7.01c	SPAC29B12.02c	spt6	set2	SPAC694.07c	kmt3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Gopalakrishnan R (2019)	30793188	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2544470	2542885	3361511	279330	280587	SPAP27G11.06c	SPAC23C4.08	vas2	rho3	aps1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kita A (2011)	21304827	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2544471	2542885	3361511	279330	280587	SPAP27G11.06c	SPAC23C4.08	vas2	rho3	aps1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kita A (2011)	21304827	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|resistance to chemicals	overexpression of rho3 rescues sensitivity to heat and FK506	-	BIOGRID
2544472	2540316	2542885	276846	279330	SPBC27B12.08	SPAP27G11.06c	sip1	vas2	-	aps1	Co-localization	physical	Yu Y (2012)	23028933	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2544473	2540316	2542885	276846	279330	SPBC27B12.08	SPAP27G11.06c	sip1	vas2	-	aps1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Yu Y (2012)	23028933	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2545257	2542744	2542169	279194	278644	SPAC1565.08	SPAC29A4.06c	cdc48	SPAC29A4.06c	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545258	2541053	2541413	277568	277921	SPBC56F2.10c	SPBPJ4664.06	alg5	gpt1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bredeston LM (2017)	27587357	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545259	2542883	2543387	279328	279809	SPAC1486.04c	SPAPB1E7.02c	alm1	mcl1	-	slr3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545260	2542883	3361543	279328	280619	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC9.13c	alm1	cwf16	-	SPAPJ735.01c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545261	14217659	2540612	4254021	277138	SPNCRNA.1459	SPBC1D7.05	SPNCRNA.1459	byr2	-	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Touat-Todeschini L (2017)	28765164	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545262	2543037	2541942	279472	278429	SPAC4G9.04c	SPAC222.09	pcf11	seb1	SPAC4G9.04c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Larochelle M (2017)	27582274	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545263	2542883	2543044	279328	279479	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC3C7.12	alm1	tip1	-	noc1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545264	2542883	2541413	279328	277921	SPAC1486.04c	SPBPJ4664.06	alm1	gpt1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545265	2542883	3361526	279328	280602	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC664.15	alm1	caf4	-	SPAC25D11.02C|SPACUNK12.01	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545266	2542883	2539001	279328	275575	SPAC1486.04c	SPCC1494.08c	alm1	SPCC1494.08c	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545267	2542883	2543210	279328	279639	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC3A11.03	alm1	SPAC3A11.03	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545268	2541206	2541053	277720	277568	SPBC839.11c	SPBC56F2.10c	hut1	alg5	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bredeston LM (2017)	27587357	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545269	2540993	2541413	277509	277921	SPBC342.01c	SPBPJ4664.06	alg6	gpt1	SPBC3F6.06c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bredeston LM (2017)	27587357	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545270	2539016	2543441	275589	279861	SPCC970.04c	SPAC821.12	mob2	orb6	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wiley DJ (2003)	12646585	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545271	2543058	2542193	279492	278668	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC9G1.11c	rpn15	spn4	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545272	2542744	2543027	279194	279463	SPAC1565.08	SPAC110.03	cdc48	cdc42	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545273	2542744	2540003	279194	276547	SPAC1565.08	SPBC1105.07c	cdc48	SPBC1105.07c	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545274	2539368	3361316	275934	280392	SPCC16A11.07	SPBC2D10.03c	coq10	SPBC2D10.03c	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	A Rahaman SN (2018)	30280012	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545275	2540464	2542378	276992	278842	SPBC23E6.02	SPAC1805.04	rrp2	nup132	SPBC23E6.02	Nup133b	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Wei Y (2017)	28552615	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545276	3361323	2543240	280399	279668	SPBC30D10.04	SPAC694.06c	swi3	mrc1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Shimmoto M (2009)	19422421	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545277	2540212	2542194	276745	278669	SPBC9B6.05c	SPAC17G6.17	lsm3	pof8	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mennie AK (2018)	29422503	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545278	2538913	2541505	275490	278007	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC57A7.04c	ccr4	pabp	SPCC5E4.02c	pab1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Webster MW (2018)	29932902	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545279	2539242	2542467	275812	278928	SPCC290.04	SPAC1834.04	ams2	hht1	SPCC4F11.01	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Takayama Y (2007)	17452352	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545280	2543577	2543240	279992	279668	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC694.06c	srs2	mrc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yasuhira S (2009)	19205745	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545281	2542222	2538974	278695	275548	SPAC31G5.18c	SPCC550.02c	sde2	cwf5	-	ecm2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545282	2542744	2541212	279194	277726	SPAC1565.08	SPBC887.05c	cdc48	cwf29	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545283	2542222	2539645	278695	276200	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC146.07	sde2	prp2	-	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545284	2542222	2542169	278695	278644	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC29A4.06c	sde2	SPAC29A4.06c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545285	2540501	2539731	277029	276283	SPBC27B12.11c	SPBC1271.09	pho7	SPBC1271.09	SPBC27B12.11c	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Garg A (2018)	30212894	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545286	2539540	2540612	276102	277138	SPCC736.12c	SPBC1D7.05	mmi1	byr2	-	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Touat-Todeschini L (2017)	28765164	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545287	2542744	2538766	279194	275349	SPAC1565.08	SPCC306.08c	cdc48	SPCC306.08c	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545288	2542744	2543302	279194	279727	SPAC1565.08	SPAC6B12.13	cdc48	SPAC6B12.13	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545289	2542744	2543412	279194	279834	SPAC1565.08	SPAC637.07	cdc48	moe1	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545290	2542744	2539188	279194	275759	SPAC1565.08	SPCC1827.04	cdc48	vms1	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	SPCC1827.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545291	2542883	2540498	279328	277026	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC27.02c	alm1	ask1	-	mug181	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545292	2541455	2541957	277958	278444	SPAC6G9.06c	SPAC23C11.16	pcp1	plo1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Fong CS (2010)	19942852	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545293	2540389	3361543	276917	280619	SPBC31E1.03	SPAC9.13c	hub1	cwf16	ubl4	SPAPJ735.01c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545294	2543492	2539733	279912	276285	SPAC890.07c	SPBC16E9.12c	rmt1	pab2	prmt1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Perreault A (2007)	17213188	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545295	2542883	2539395	279328	275960	SPAC1486.04c	SPCC663.11	alm1	saf1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545296	2541942	2541087	278429	277602	SPAC222.09	SPBC646.10c	seb1	SPBC646.10c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemay JF (2016)	27401558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545297	2542883	2539214	279328	275784	SPAC1486.04c	SPCC1672.10	alm1	mis16	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545298	2542883	2539847	279328	276395	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC530.14c	alm1	dsk1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545299	2542850	2541053	279296	277568	SPAC144.18	SPBC56F2.10c	vrg4	alg5	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bredeston LM (2017)	27587357	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545300	2540369	2539214	276898	275784	SPBC27B12.02	SPCC1672.10	mis19	mis16	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	-	Co-purification	physical	Hirai H (2014)	25375240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545301	2540728	2543240	277251	279668	SPBC216.06c	SPAC694.06c	swi1	mrc1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Shimmoto M (2009)	19422421	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545302	2541620	2543240	278117	279668	SPAC2G11.12	SPAC694.06c	rqh1	mrc1	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yasuhira S (2009)	19205745	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545303	2540954	2543339	277470	279762	SPBC337.13c	SPAC630.13c	gtr1	tsc2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545304	2542222	2542772	278695	279221	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC16.02c	sde2	srp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545305	2542222	2542684	278695	279137	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC26A3.08	sde2	smb1	-	smb	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545306	2543058	2540352	279492	276881	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC215.03c	rpn15	csn1	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545307	2541165	2543240	277680	279668	SPBC776.12c	SPAC694.06c	hsk1	mrc1	cdc7	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Shimmoto M (2009)	19422421	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545308	2540398	2539351	276926	275917	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC1840.11	dis3	csl4	rrp44	SPCC965.01	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lemay JF (2014)	25240800	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545309	2540559	2543339	277086	279762	SPBC26H8.04c	SPAC630.13c	SPBC26H8.04c	tsc2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545310	2541950	3361316	278437	280392	SPAC222.03c	SPBC2D10.03c	tim10	SPBC2D10.03c	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	A Rahaman SN (2018)	30280012	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545311	2543082	2539336	279515	275902	SPAC3C7.08c	SPCC74.05	elf1	rpl2702	-	rpl27-2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Marayati BF (2018)	29844133	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545312	2540440	2541741	276968	278235	SPBC646.12c	SPAC20G4.02c	gap1	fus1	sar1|src1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Merlini L (2018)	29453312	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545313	2542883	3361470	279328	280546	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC3G9.01	alm1	nsk1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545314	2542883	2540993	279328	277509	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC342.01c	alm1	alg6	-	SPBC3F6.06c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545315	2542883	2542204	279328	278679	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC17A5.14	alm1	exo2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545316	2542883	2541627	279328	278123	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC1F5.08c	alm1	yam8	-	ehs1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545317	2542883	2542060	279328	278538	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC23C11.14	alm1	zhf1	-	zhf	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545318	2542883	2542963	279328	279403	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC1071.03c	alm1	sil1	-	SPAC1071.03c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545319	2542883	2542777	279328	279226	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC6F6.03c	alm1	SPAC6F6.03c	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545320	2541206	2540993	277720	277509	SPBC839.11c	SPBC342.01c	hut1	alg6	-	SPBC3F6.06c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bredeston LM (2017)	27587357	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545321	2542129	2540199	278605	276732	SPAC17G8.12	SPBC1709.05	sec3	sks2	SPAC17G8.12	hsc1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kampmeyer C (2017)	28765280	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545322	2540761	2539775	277281	276326	SPBC21.04	SPBC14C8.17c	med8	spt8	sep15	sep9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Batta G (2009)	19473263	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545323	2541652	3361483	278148	280559	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC513.01c	sty1	eft201	phh1|spc1	SPAPYUK71.04c|eft2-1|etf2|eft2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Asp E (2008)	18065650	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545324	2543058	2541158	279492	277673	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC660.13c	rpn15	ssb1	dss1|sem1	rad11|rpa1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545325	2540350	2539287	276879	275855	SPBC317.01	SPCC1742.01	mbx2	gsf2	pvg4	SPCC1742.01|pfl1|SPCC1795.13|SPCPB16A4.07c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Matsuzawa T (2011)	22180499	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545326	2540966	3361342	277482	280418	SPBC3D6.09	SPBC16D10.07c	dpb4	sir2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	He H (2017)	29109278	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545327	2540966	3361342	277482	280418	SPBC3D6.09	SPBC16D10.07c	dpb4	sir2	-	-	Co-purification	physical	He H (2017)	29109278	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545328	2540966	3361342	277482	280418	SPBC3D6.09	SPBC16D10.07c	dpb4	sir2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	He H (2017)	29109278	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545329	2539958	2542001	276502	278485	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC20G8.06	zfs1	not1	moc4	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Webster MW (2019)	30601114	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545330	2539958	2542094	276502	278571	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC29B12.06c	zfs1	rcd1	moc4	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Webster MW (2019)	30601114	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545331	2540557	2540557	277084	277084	SPBC29A10.04	SPBC29A10.04	psm1	psm1	smc1	smc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545332	2542744	2540528	279194	277056	SPAC1565.08	SPBC18H10.04c	cdc48	sce3	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	tif48	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545333	2540733	2540733	277256	277256	SPBC4.01	SPBC4.01	dni2	dni2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Curto M A (2018)	29134248	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545334	2541925	2539775	278413	276326	SPAC5D6.05	SPBC14C8.17c	med18	spt8	sep11|pmc6	sep9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Batta G (2009)	19473263	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545335	9406966	3361342	1028329	280418	SPCC16C4.22	SPBC16D10.07c	SPCC16C4.22	sir2	SPNCRNA.470|SPNG2185	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	He H (2017)	29109278	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545336	2538930	2542204	275506	278679	SPCC188.13c	SPAC17A5.14	dcr1	exo2	SPCC584.10c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Atkinson SR (2018)	29914874	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545337	2538852	2540557	275433	277084	SPCC4E9.01c	SPBC29A10.04	rec11	psm1	SPCC550.16c	smc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545338	2541929	2540557	278417	277084	SPAC23C4.12	SPBC29A10.04	hhp2	psm1	-	smc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545339	2540464	2542744	276992	279194	SPBC23E6.02	SPAC1565.08	rrp2	cdc48	SPBC23E6.02	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Wei Y (2017)	28552615	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545340	2542544	3361342	279001	280418	SPAC18G6.10	SPBC16D10.07c	lem2	sir2	heh1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Barrales RR (2016)	26744419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545341	2542850	2540993	279296	277509	SPAC144.18	SPBC342.01c	vrg4	alg6	-	SPBC3F6.06c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Bredeston LM (2017)	27587357	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545342	2542329	2540270	278795	276801	SPAC9G1.10c	SPBC2G2.02	SPAC9G1.10c	syj1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Snider CE (2018)	29975157	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545343	2543010	2540557	279448	277084	SPAC10F6.09c	SPBC29A10.04	psm3	psm1	smc3	smc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545344	2540458	2540557	276986	277084	SPBC29A10.14	SPBC29A10.04	rec8	psm1	-	smc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545345	2538913	2542001	275490	278485	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC20G8.06	ccr4	not1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Webster MW (2018)	29932902	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545346	2538913	2542094	275490	278571	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC29B12.06c	ccr4	rcd1	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Webster MW (2018)	29932902	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545347	2542231	2540270	278704	276801	SPAC19G12.14	SPBC2G2.02	its3	syj1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Snider CE (2018)	29975157	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545348	2542231	2540270	278704	276801	SPAC19G12.14	SPBC2G2.02	its3	syj1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Snider CE (2018)	29975157	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545349	2542222	2541461	278695	277963	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC1F3.09	sde2	mug161	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545350	2538913	2539041	275490	275614	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC18.06c	ccr4	caf1	SPCC5E4.02c	pop2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Webster MW (2018)	29932902	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545351	2540654	2540234	277179	276766	SPBC19F5.01c	SPBC336.12c	puc1	cdc10	SPBP8B7.32c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Caligiuri M (1997)	9201720	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545352	2542300	2542001	278767	278485	SPAC1687.22c	SPAC20G8.06	puf3	not1	SPAC222.02c	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Webster MW (2019)	30601114	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545353	2542300	2542094	278767	278571	SPAC1687.22c	SPAC29B12.06c	puf3	rcd1	SPAC222.02c	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Webster MW (2019)	30601114	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545354	2542222	2541211	278695	277725	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC839.10	sde2	usp107	-	snu71	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545355	2542222	2541437	278695	277942	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC22A12.09c	sde2	sap114	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545356	2540070	2542080	276608	278557	SPBC119.04	SPAC27D7.03c	mei3	mei2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	McLeod M (1987)	3034608	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545357	2542732	2540936	279182	277452	SPAC25G10.07c	SPBC800.05c	cut7	atb2	-	alp2|ban5|tub1	Co-crystal Structure	physical	von Loeffelholz O (2019)	30659798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545358	2542300	2539041	278767	275614	SPAC1687.22c	SPCC18.06c	puf3	caf1	SPAC222.02c	pop2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Webster MW (2019)	30601114	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545359	2542883	2541127	279328	277642	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC651.02	alm1	SPBC651.02	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545360	2542883	2539432	279328	275995	SPAC1486.04c	SPCC965.05c	alm1	thp1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545361	2542883	2539993	279328	276537	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC1105.05	alm1	exg1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545362	2542883	2539486	279328	276049	SPAC1486.04c	SPCC74.09	alm1	mug24	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545363	2543058	2539879	279492	276425	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC1703.07	rpn15	SPBC1703.07	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545364	2542883	2543672	279328	280086	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC4H3.01	alm1	SPAC4H3.01	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545365	2541942	2541383	278429	277894	SPAC222.09	SPBP8B7.16c	seb1	dbp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemay JF (2016)	27401558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545366	2541942	2541910	278429	278400	SPAC222.09	SPAC23C4.15	seb1	rpb5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemay JF (2016)	27401558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545367	2542883	2541210	279328	277724	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC887.06c	alm1	snx3	-	grd19	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545368	2542883	2538763	279328	275346	SPAC1486.04c	SPCC970.12	alm1	mis18	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545369	2542883	2543199	279328	279628	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC821.03c	alm1	slf1	-	SPAC821.03c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545370	2542883	2542271	279328	278740	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC3F10.10c	alm1	map3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545371	2540369	2538763	276898	275346	SPBC27B12.02	SPCC970.12	mis19	mis18	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	-	Co-purification	physical	Hirai H (2014)	25375240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545372	2543058	2541811	279492	278302	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC22A12.16	rpn15	SPAC22A12.16	dss1|sem1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545373	2538734	2541881	275318	278371	SPCC1322.13	SPAC22F3.10c	ade6	gcs1	min1	apd1|gsh1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chaudhuri B (1997)	9017391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545374	2542723	2543425	279174	279845	SPAC25H1.03	SPAC4F10.07c	atg101	atg13	mug66	apg13|mug78	Co-purification	physical	Nanji T (2017)	28976798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545375	2543011	2543425	279449	279845	SPAC10F6.11c	SPAC4F10.07c	atg17	atg13	-	apg13|mug78	Co-purification	physical	Nanji T (2017)	28976798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545376	2541153	2540234	277668	276766	SPBC725.16	SPBC336.12c	res1	cdc10	sct1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Caligiuri M (1997)	9201720	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545377	2540718	2540557	277241	277084	SPBC3H7.15	SPBC29A10.04	hhp1	psm1	-	smc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545378	2538994	2542749	275568	279199	SPCC553.01c	SPAC15A10.03c	dbl2	rad54	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	rhp54	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Polakova S (2016)	27304859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545379	3361323	2539399	280399	275964	SPBC30D10.04	SPCC550.13	swi3	dfp1	-	him1|rad35|dbf4	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Shimmoto M (2009)	19422421	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545380	2542655	2539244	279109	275814	SPAC3A11.14c	SPCC1672.06c	pkl1	asp1	SPAC3H5.03c|klp1	vip1	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Topolski B (2016)	27697865	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545381	2540060	2539244	276598	275814	SPBC106.01	SPCC1672.06c	mph1	asp1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	vip1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Topolski B (2016)	27697865	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545382	2542773	2541612	279222	278109	SPAC16.01	SPAC1F7.04	rho2	rho1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Hirata D (1998)	9405296	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545383	3361358	2541881	280434	278371	SPBC3F6.03	SPAC22F3.10c	trr1	gcs1	caf4	apd1|gsh1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Boronat S (2017)	28640807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545384	2539958	2539041	276502	275614	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC18.06c	zfs1	caf1	moc4	pop2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Webster MW (2019)	30601114	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545385	2540234	2541318	276766	277830	SPBC336.12c	SPBP23A10.08	cdc10	alp5	-	arp4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Knezevic I (2018)	30134042	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545386	2541455	2542161	277958	278637	SPAC6G9.06c	SPAC1786.03	pcp1	cut11	-	SPAC24C9.01	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Fong CS (2010)	19942852	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545387	2539700	2539244	276253	275814	SPBC1685.15c	SPCC1672.06c	klp6	asp1	SPBC649.01c|sot2	vip1	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Topolski B (2016)	27697865	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545389	2539352	2540821	275918	277339	SPCC188.07	SPBC800.03	ccq1	clr3	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Armstrong CA (2018)	29216371	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545390	2539352	2540821	275918	277339	SPCC188.07	SPBC800.03	ccq1	clr3	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Armstrong CA (2018)	29216371	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545391	2542744	2539028	279194	275601	SPAC1565.08	SPCC1281.07c	cdc48	SPCC1281.07c	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545392	2542744	2543607	279194	280022	SPAC1565.08	SPAC4F8.07c	cdc48	hxk2	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545393	2539907	2539907	276453	276453	SPBC1198.04c	SPBC1198.04c	zas1	zas1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Schiklenk C (2018)	29735745	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545394	2540389	2538901	276917	275479	SPBC31E1.03	SPCP1E11.07c	hub1	cwf18	ubl4	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545395	2543492	2540705	279912	277228	SPAC890.07c	SPBC20F10.01	rmt1	gar1	prmt1	SPBC25H2.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Perreault A (2007)	17213188	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545396	2542883	2539930	279328	276474	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC1198.11c	alm1	reb1	-	SPBC660.01c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545397	2542883	2542564	279328	279020	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC1851.03	alm1	ckb1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545398	2542883	2543315	279328	279739	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC6B12.07c	alm1	SPAC6B12.07c	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545399	2542883	2543436	279328	279856	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC823.05c	alm1	tlg2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545400	2542883	2540316	279328	276846	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC27B12.08	alm1	sip1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545401	2542883	2542764	279328	279214	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC15E1.10	alm1	SPAC15E1.10	-	SPAP7G5.01	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545402	2542883	2542004	279328	278487	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC27F1.04c	alm1	nuf2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545403	2542883	2541006	279328	277521	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC4C3.08	alm1	mug136	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545404	2541942	2539789	278429	276339	SPAC222.09	SPBC1711.16	seb1	pwp1	-	SPBC1711.16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemay JF (2016)	27401558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545405	2538763	2541710	275346	278205	SPCC970.12	SPAC343.11c	mis18	msc1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Gao C (2017)	28827290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545406	2538763	2541710	275346	278205	SPCC970.12	SPAC343.11c	mis18	msc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gao C (2017)	28827290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545407	2540464	2542757	276992	279207	SPBC23E6.02	SPAC13C5.07	rrp2	mre11	SPBC23E6.02	rad32	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Wei Y (2017)	28552615	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545408	2540954	2540131	277470	276668	SPBC337.13c	SPBC1778.05c	gtr1	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545409	2540131	2540954	276668	277470	SPBC1778.05c	SPBC337.13c	SPBC1778.05c	gtr1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545410	2543290	2539658	279715	276213	SPAC9E9.10c	SPBC1105.17	cbh1	cnp1	cbh	sim2	Protein-peptide	physical	Tan HL (2018)	29194511	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545411	9407207	2540954	1028570	277470	SPAC23D3.16	SPBC337.13c	SPAC23D3.16	gtr1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545412	2541479	2539658	277981	276213	SPAC27F1.06c	SPBC1105.17	SPAC27F1.06c	cnp1	-	sim2	Protein-peptide	physical	Tan HL (2018)	29194511	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545413	2541479	2539658	277981	276213	SPAC27F1.06c	SPBC1105.17	SPAC27F1.06c	cnp1	-	sim2	Co-purification	physical	Tan HL (2018)	29194511	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545414	2540856	2541699	277373	278195	SPBC4F6.12	SPAP8A3.08	pxl1	cdc4	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ge W (2008)	18272786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545415	2538913	2542325	275490	278791	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC16C9.04c	ccr4	mot2	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Webster MW (2018)	29932902	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545416	2540559	2540954	277086	277470	SPBC26H8.04c	SPBC337.13c	SPBC26H8.04c	gtr1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545417	2540895	2539658	277411	276213	SPBC577.15c	SPBC1105.17	sim3	cnp1	-	sim2	Protein-peptide	physical	Tan HL (2018)	29194511	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545418	2539009	2541649	275582	278145	SPCC1739.04c	SPAC1F3.06c	SPCC1739.04c	spo15	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Blyth J (2018)	29259000	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545419	2539812	2539658	276362	276213	SPBC1347.02	SPBC1105.17	fkbp39	cnp1	-	sim2	Protein-peptide	physical	Tan HL (2018)	29194511	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545420	2539812	2539658	276362	276213	SPBC1347.02	SPBC1105.17	fkbp39	cnp1	-	sim2	Co-purification	physical	Tan HL (2018)	29194511	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545421	2542222	2540983	278695	277499	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC337.06c	sde2	cwf15	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545422	2542222	2542482	278695	278942	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAP8A3.06	sde2	uaf2	-	SPAP8A3.06|ods2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545423	2542222	2538901	278695	275479	SPAC31G5.18c	SPCP1E11.07c	sde2	cwf18	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545424	2542222	2540705	278695	277228	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC20F10.01	sde2	gar1	-	SPBC25H2.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545425	2542032	2542757	278514	279207	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC13C5.07	pnk1	mre11	-	rad32	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2017)	28922417	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545426	2542300	2542325	278767	278791	SPAC1687.22c	SPAC16C9.04c	puf3	mot2	SPAC222.02c	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Webster MW (2019)	30601114	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545427	2540550	2540954	277077	277470	SPBC25H2.02	SPBC337.13c	trs1	gtr1	ths1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Otsubo Y (2018)	29330317	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545428	2542883	2540485	279328	277013	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC3B9.05	alm1	SPBC3B9.05	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545429	2542883	2543515	279328	279933	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC4F10.14c	alm1	btf3	-	btt1|egd1|nac2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545430	2542883	2543287	279328	279712	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC9E9.05	alm1	SPAC9E9.05	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545431	2541942	2541814	278429	278305	SPAC222.09	SPAC23G3.06	seb1	SPAC23G3.06	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemay JF (2016)	27401558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545432	9407127	2540954	1028490	277470	SPBC29A10.17	SPBC337.13c	SPBC29A10.17	gtr1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545433	2540046	2540954	276584	277470	SPBC1773.10c	SPBC337.13c	nrs1	gtr1	ded81	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Otsubo Y (2018)	29330317	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545434	2541840	2540954	278331	277470	SPAC23H3.03c	SPBC337.13c	npr2	gtr1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545435	3361327	2541710	280403	278205	SPBC21.01	SPAC343.11c	mis17	msc1	SPBC776.19	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Gao C (2017)	28827290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545436	3361327	2541710	280403	278205	SPBC21.01	SPAC343.11c	mis17	msc1	SPBC776.19	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gao C (2017)	28827290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545437	2541635	2542757	278131	279207	SPAC1556.01c	SPAC13C5.07	rad50	mre11	SPAP4C9.01c	rad32	Two-hybrid	physical	Zhu M (2018)	30104346	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545438	2539214	2541710	275784	278205	SPCC1672.10	SPAC343.11c	mis16	msc1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Gao C (2017)	28827290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545439	2539214	2541710	275784	278205	SPCC1672.10	SPAC343.11c	mis16	msc1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gao C (2017)	28827290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545440	2542744	2542698	279194	279151	SPAC1565.08	SPAC26H5.09c	cdc48	SPAC26H5.09c	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545441	2538740	2540560	275323	277087	SPCC794.08	SPBC2D10.14c	efr3	myo51	SPCC794.08	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Snider CE (2017)	28784611	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545442	2542670	2540954	279123	277470	SPAC26F1.13c	SPBC337.13c	lrs1	gtr1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Otsubo Y (2018)	29330317	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545443	2541321	2541710	277833	278205	SPBP22H7.09c	SPAC343.11c	mis15	msc1	pi022|SPACTOKYO_453.12	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Gao C (2017)	28827290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545444	2541321	2541710	277833	278205	SPBP22H7.09c	SPAC343.11c	mis15	msc1	pi022|SPACTOKYO_453.12	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Gao C (2017)	28827290	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545445	2541582	2542822	278079	279269	SPAC29E6.08	SPAC13F5.02c	tbp1	ptr6	SPAC30.12|tbp|tdf1	taf7	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Huang Y (2003)	12682361	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545446	2539958	2542325	276502	278791	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC16C9.04c	zfs1	mot2	moc4	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Webster MW (2019)	30601114	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545447	2542544	2542564	279001	279020	SPAC18G6.10	SPAC1851.03	lem2	ckb1	heh1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Barrales RR (2016)	26744419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545448	2538692	2539091	275277	275663	SPCC162.04c	SPCC285.07c	wtf13	wtf18	wtf12	wtf5	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bravo Nunez MA (2018)	30475921	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545449	2539088	2540954	275660	277470	SPCC777.05	SPBC337.13c	gtr2	gtr1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545450	2539088	2540131	275660	276668	SPCC777.05	SPBC1778.05c	gtr2	SPBC1778.05c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545451	2541073	2540954	277588	277470	SPBC543.04	SPBC337.13c	SPBC543.04	gtr1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545452	2540720	2540954	277243	277470	SPBC216.07c	SPBC337.13c	tor2	gtr1	SPBC646.01c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545453	2542222	2540869	278695	277386	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC4B4.09	sde2	usp105	-	prp39	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545454	2542222	2542636	278695	279090	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAP27G11.13c	sde2	nop10	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545455	2540431	2540954	276959	277470	SPBC19C7.06	SPBC337.13c	prs1	gtr1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Otsubo Y (2018)	29330317	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545456	2538992	2540954	275566	277470	SPCC290.02	SPBC337.13c	rpc34	gtr1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Otsubo Y (2018)	29330317	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545457	14218092	2540954	4254454	277470	SPAC222.19	SPBC337.13c	tam1	gtr1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545458	2538846	2541699	275427	278195	SPCC1919.10c	SPAP8A3.08	myo52	cdc4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	D'souza VM (2001)	11942609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545459	2538736	2541633	275320	278129	SPCC1322.12c	SPAC664.01c	bub1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kawashima SA (2010)	19965387	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545460	2542744	2540143	279194	276680	SPAC1565.08	SPBC15D4.11c	cdc48	mam33	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	SPBC15D4.11c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545461	2542883	2540474	279328	277002	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC26H8.09c	alm1	snf59	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545462	2542883	2542152	279328	278628	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC589.12	alm1	SPAC589.12	-	SPAC688.01	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545463	2541942	2539694	278429	276248	SPAC222.09	SPBC1709.08	seb1	cft1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemay JF (2016)	27401558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545464	2542883	2543535	279328	279952	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC4G8.07c	alm1	SPAC4G8.07c	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545465	2542204	2538930	278679	275506	SPAC17A5.14	SPCC188.13c	exo2	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Atkinson SR (2018)	29914874	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545466	2542129	2541768	278605	278262	SPAC17G8.12	SPAC11G7.04	sec3	ubi1	SPAC17G8.12	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kampmeyer C (2017)	28765280	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545467	2543058	2541268	279492	277782	SPAC3G6.02	SPBP19A11.03c	rpn15	mts4	dss1|sem1	rpn1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545468	2541368	2541347	277879	277858	SPBP4H10.21c	SPBP8B7.14c	sld5	dpb2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Handa T (2012)	22718908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545469	2543310	2541347	279734	277858	SPAC6B12.11	SPBP8B7.14c	drc1	dpb2	sld2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Handa T (2012)	22718908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545471	2540389	2542256	276917	278726	SPBC31E1.03	SPAC29A4.08c	hub1	prp19	ubl4	cwf8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545472	2538994	2543086	275568	279519	SPCC553.01c	SPAC30D11.10	dbl2	rad52	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Polakova S (2016)	27304859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545473	2540389	2542555	276917	279012	SPBC31E1.03	SPAC1952.06c	hub1	SPAC1952.06c	ubl4	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545474	2541474	2541347	277976	277858	SPAC227.16c	SPBP8B7.14c	psf3	dpb2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Handa T (2012)	22718908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545475	2539207	2542262	275777	278731	SPCC285.09c	SPAC17C9.10	cgs2	stm1	pde1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chung KS (2001)	11461899	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545476	2541582	2541848	278079	278339	SPAC29E6.08	SPAC2G11.14	tbp1	taf111	SPAC30.12|tbp|tdf1	kat4|taf1|taf130	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Huang Y (2003)	12682361	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545477	2541194	2541347	277708	277858	SPBC725.13c	SPBP8B7.14c	psf2	dpb2	bsh3|dre13	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Handa T (2012)	22718908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545478	2543281	2541347	279708	277858	SPAC23C4.18c	SPBP8B7.14c	rad4	dpb2	cut5|dpb11|dre3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Handa T (2012)	22718908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545479	2539242	2539804	275812	276354	SPCC290.04	SPBC1105.11c	ams2	hht3	SPCC4F11.01	h3.3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Takayama Y (2007)	17452352	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545480	2540464	2541635	276992	278131	SPBC23E6.02	SPAC1556.01c	rrp2	rad50	SPBC23E6.02	SPAP4C9.01c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Wei Y (2017)	28552615	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545481	2539641	2540473	276196	277001	SPBC14C8.01c	SPBC30D10.10c	cut2	tor1	SPBC1815.02c	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ikai N (2011)	22645648	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545482	2541324	2541347	277836	277858	SPBP23A10.09	SPBP8B7.14c	psf1	dpb2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Handa T (2012)	22718908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545483	2539088	9407207	275660	1028570	SPCC777.05	SPAC23D3.16	gtr2	SPAC23D3.16	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545484	2540347	2538930	276876	275506	SPBC30B4.08	SPCC188.13c	eri1	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Iida T (2006)	16797182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545485	2539838	2541347	276387	277858	SPBC1347.10	SPBP8B7.14c	cdc23	dpb2	mcm10	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Handa T (2012)	22718908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545486	2542477	2541347	278937	277858	SPAC1B2.05	SPBP8B7.14c	mcm5	dpb2	SPAC3F10.01|nda4	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Handa T (2012)	22718908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545487	2539041	2538930	275614	275506	SPCC18.06c	SPCC188.13c	caf1	dcr1	pop2	SPCC584.10c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Broenner C (2017)	28404620	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545488	2539540	2538930	276102	275506	SPCC736.12c	SPCC188.13c	mmi1	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Touat-Todeschini L (2017)	28765164	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545489	2542744	2541532	279194	278032	SPAC1565.08	SPAC2C4.15c	cdc48	ubx2	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	ucp13	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545490	2540856	2539513	277373	276075	SPBC4F6.12	SPCC645.05c	pxl1	myo2	-	rng5	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ge W (2008)	18272786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545491	2540856	2543545	277373	279962	SPBC4F6.12	SPAC926.03	pxl1	rlc1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ge W (2008)	18272786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545492	2542222	2542256	278695	278726	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC29A4.08c	sde2	prp19	-	cwf8	Co-purification	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545493	2539164	2541347	275735	277858	SPCC16A11.17	SPBP8B7.14c	mcm4	dpb2	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Handa T (2012)	22718908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545494	2540627	2541347	277153	277858	SPBC25H2.13c	SPBP8B7.14c	cdc20	dpb2	pol2	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Handa T (2012)	22718908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545495	2542222	2542256	278695	278726	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC29A4.08c	sde2	prp19	-	cwf8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545496	2542222	2539818	278695	276368	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC11C11.08	sde2	srp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545497	2542222	2541185	278695	277699	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC6B1.07	sde2	prp1	-	zer1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545498	2539027	2541652	275600	278148	SPCC1322.08	SPAC24B11.06c	srk1	sty1	mkp1	phh1|spc1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Asp E (2008)	18065650	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545499	2540784	2541347	277303	277858	SPBC211.04c	SPBP8B7.14c	mcm6	dpb2	mis5	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Handa T (2012)	22718908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545500	2542883	2541605	279328	278102	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC1F7.01c	alm1	spt6	-	SPAC694.07c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545501	2542032	2543086	278514	279519	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC30D11.10	pnk1	rad52	-	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sanchez A (2017)	28922417	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545502	2542883	2543058	279328	279492	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC3G6.02	alm1	rpn15	-	dss1|sem1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545503	2541942	2540268	278429	276799	SPAC222.09	SPBC800.06	seb1	brx1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemay JF (2016)	27401558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545504	2541942	2540873	278429	277390	SPAC222.09	SPBC4C3.05c	seb1	nuc1	-	rpa1|rpa190	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemay JF (2016)	27401558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545505	2542883	2540443	279328	276971	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC2D10.16	alm1	mhf1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545506	2540620	2541347	277146	277858	SPBC4.04c	SPBP8B7.14c	mcm2	dpb2	cdc19|nda1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Handa T (2012)	22718908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545507	2542883	2542293	279328	278761	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC17G8.14c	alm1	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545508	2540954	9407207	277470	1028570	SPBC337.13c	SPAC23D3.16	gtr1	SPAC23D3.16	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545509	2541652	2539544	278148	276105	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCP31B10.07	sty1	eft202	phh1|spc1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Asp E (2008)	18065650	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545510	2538740	2539513	275323	276075	SPCC794.08	SPCC645.05c	efr3	myo2	SPCC794.08	rng5	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Snider CE (2017)	28784611	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545511	2542883	2540318	279328	276848	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC30B4.04c	alm1	sol1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545512	2542883	2540081	279328	276619	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC1685.07c	alm1	avt5	-	avt8	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545513	2542883	2542000	279328	278484	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC20H4.06c	alm1	SPAC20H4.06c	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545514	2542883	2541470	279328	277972	SPAC1486.04c	SPAPYUG7.04c	alm1	rpb9	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545515	2542129	2539225	278605	275795	SPAC17G8.12	SPCC1739.13	sec3	ssa2	SPAC17G8.12	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kampmeyer C (2017)	28765280	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545516	2540443	2539408	276971	275973	SPBC2D10.16	SPCC576.12c	mhf1	mhf2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Zafar F (2017)	28977643	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545517	2543058	2542090	279492	278567	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC25G10.08	rpn15	SPAC25G10.08	dss1|sem1	p116	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545518	2541603	2539513	278100	276075	SPAC1F5.04c	SPCC645.05c	cdc12	myo2	-	rng5	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Willet AH (2018)	29343550	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545519	14218195	3361379	4254557	280455	SPATRNAPRO.02	SPATRNAPRO.01	SPATRNAPRO.02	SPATRNAPRO.01	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Miklos I (2009)	19636559	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545520	3361566	2542665	280642	279118	SPAC29B12.01	SPAC10F6.08c	ino80	nht10	SPAC3G6.12	nht1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hogan CJ (2010)	19933844	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545521	2543027	2542635	279463	279089	SPAC110.03	SPAC24H6.09	cdc42	gef1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Wei B (2016)	26941334	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545522	2541840	2540716	278331	277239	SPAC23H3.03c	SPBC215.15	npr2	sec13	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545523	2542194	9407016	278669	1028379	SPAC17G6.17	SPNCRNA.214	pof8	ter1	-	SPNG585	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mennie AK (2018)	29422503	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545524	2542194	9407016	278669	1028379	SPAC17G6.17	SPNCRNA.214	pof8	ter1	-	SPNG585	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Collopy LC (2018)	29422501	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545525	2542194	9407016	278669	1028379	SPAC17G6.17	SPNCRNA.214	pof8	ter1	-	SPNG585	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Collopy LC (2018)	29422501	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545526	2539775	2541661	276326	278157	SPBC14C8.17c	SPAC6G10.12c	spt8	ace2	sep9	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Batta G (2009)	19473263	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545527	2542744	2542649	279194	279103	SPAC1565.08	SPAC24C9.14	cdc48	otu1	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	mug141	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545528	2542744	5802714	279194	857852	SPAC1565.08	SPCC4B3.01	cdc48	tum1	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	SPCP25A2.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545529	2542744	2539623	279194	276180	SPAC1565.08	SPBC16A3.09c	cdc48	ufd1	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545530	2540464	2539967	276992	276511	SPBC23E6.02	SPBC16H5.03c	rrp2	fub2	SPBC23E6.02	uba2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Wei Y (2017)	28552615	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545531	2540212	9407016	276745	1028379	SPBC9B6.05c	SPNCRNA.214	lsm3	ter1	-	SPNG585	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mennie AK (2018)	29422503	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545532	2542744	2542462	279194	278923	SPAC1565.08	SPAC19B12.11c	cdc48	SPAC19B12.11c	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545533	2540557	2538852	277084	275433	SPBC29A10.04	SPCC4E9.01c	psm1	rec11	smc1	SPCC550.16c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545534	2540856	2542358	277373	278823	SPBC4F6.12	SPAC1782.09c	pxl1	clp1	-	flp1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ge W (2008)	18272786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545535	2540234	9407262	276766	1028625	SPBC336.12c	SPAPB1E7.14	cdc10	iec5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Knezevic I (2018)	30134042	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545536	2540473	2539481	277001	276044	SPBC30D10.10c	SPCC622.16c	tor1	epe1	-	kdm2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Cohen A (2018)	29632066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545537	2542222	2542426	278695	278888	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC31G5.01	sde2	sap49	-	SPAPB1A11.05|SF3b49	Co-purification	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545538	2542222	2542000	278695	278484	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC20H4.06c	sde2	SPAC20H4.06c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545539	2542222	2540611	278695	277137	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC3E7.13c	sde2	syf2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545540	2542222	2542426	278695	278888	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC31G5.01	sde2	sap49	-	SPAPB1A11.05|SF3b49	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545541	2540601	9407016	277127	1028379	SPBC29A3.14c	SPNCRNA.214	trt1	ter1	-	SPNG585	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mennie AK (2018)	29422503	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545542	2538852	2538852	275433	275433	SPCC4E9.01c	SPCC4E9.01c	rec11	rec11	SPCC550.16c	SPCC550.16c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545543	2539828	2540350	276377	276879	SPBC15D4.02	SPBC317.01	gsf1	mbx2	SPBC15D4.02|rfl1	pvg4	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Matsuzawa T (2011)	22180499	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545544	2541929	2538852	278417	275433	SPAC23C4.12	SPCC4E9.01c	hhp2	rec11	-	SPCC550.16c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545545	2540464	2540541	276992	277068	SPBC23E6.02	SPBC1A4.03c	rrp2	top2	SPBC23E6.02	ptr11	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wei Y (2017)	28552615	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545546	2543010	2538852	279448	275433	SPAC10F6.09c	SPCC4E9.01c	psm3	rec11	smc3	SPCC550.16c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545547	2540458	2538852	276986	275433	SPBC29A10.14	SPCC4E9.01c	rec8	rec11	-	SPCC550.16c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545548	2542883	2539444	279328	276007	SPAC1486.04c	SPCC576.13	alm1	swc5	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545549	2542883	3361456	279328	280532	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC1142.03c	alm1	swi2	-	SPAC17G6.20c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545550	2542883	2539197	279328	275768	SPAC1486.04c	SPCC24B10.14c	alm1	xlf1	-	mug104|nej1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545551	2542222	2540045	278695	276583	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC119.13c	sde2	prp31	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545552	2542409	2540650	278873	277175	SPAC17G8.10c	SPBC244.01c	dma1	sid4	-	-	Protein-peptide	physical	Jones CM (2018)	29975113	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545553	2543011	2543011	279449	279449	SPAC10F6.11c	SPAC10F6.11c	atg17	atg17	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Nanji T (2017)	28976798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545554	2542883	2539102	279328	275674	SPAC1486.04c	SPCC1919.15	alm1	brl1	-	SPCC790.01|rfp2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545555	2542140	2540542	278616	277069	SPAC1783.07c	SPBC29A10.12	pap1	SPBC29A10.12	caf3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	He Y (2017)	27664222	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545556	2541942	2540479	278429	277007	SPAC222.09	SPBC2D10.10c	seb1	fib1	-	fib|nop1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemay JF (2016)	27401558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545557	2539482	2540650	276045	277175	SPCC417.06c	SPBC244.01c	mug27	sid4	ppk35|slk1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ohtaka A (2008)	18411246	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545558	2542883	2539519	279328	276081	SPAC1486.04c	SPCC364.05	alm1	vps3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545559	2541635	2543164	278131	279595	SPAC1556.01c	SPAC3G6.06c	rad50	rad2	SPAP4C9.01c	fen1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Zhu M (2018)	30104346	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545560	2540730	2541179	277253	277693	SPBC19C2.09	SPBC6B1.08c	sre1	ofd1	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Clasen SJ (2017)	29083304	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545561	2541603	2541975	278100	278460	SPAC1F5.04c	SPAC20G8.05c	cdc12	cdc15	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Willet AH (2018)	29343550	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545562	2540718	2538852	277241	275433	SPBC3H7.15	SPCC4E9.01c	hhp1	rec11	-	SPCC550.16c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545563	2542744	2542167	279194	278642	SPAC1565.08	SPAC17C9.11c	cdc48	SPAC17C9.11c	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545564	2541798	2538959	278289	275533	SPAC22F3.03c	SPCC18B5.11c	rdh54	cds1	mug34|tid1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Moiseeva V (2017)	29123917	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545565	2542070	2542696	278547	279149	SPAC29B12.02c	SPAC29B12.03	set2	spd1	kmt3	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Pai CC (2017)	28903048	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545566	2541369	2541179	277880	277693	SPBP4H10.13	SPBC6B1.08c	rps2302	ofd1	rps23-2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Clasen SJ (2017)	29083304	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545567	2539438	2541179	276001	277693	SPCC4B3.07	SPBC6B1.08c	nro1	ofd1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lee CY (2011)	22017871	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545568	2542222	2543409	278695	279831	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC4D7.13	sde2	usp104	-	prp40	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545569	2542222	2540434	278695	276962	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC24C6.11	sde2	cwf14	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545570	2542222	2540855	278695	277372	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC4B4.05	sde2	smg1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545571	2542012	2541179	278495	277693	SPAC23C11.02c	SPBC6B1.08c	rps23	ofd1	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Clasen SJ (2017)	29083304	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545572	2542012	2541179	278495	277693	SPAC23C11.02c	SPBC6B1.08c	rps23	ofd1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Clasen SJ (2017)	29083304	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545573	2540557	2539004	277084	275578	SPBC29A10.04	SPCC4G3.05c	psm1	mus81	smc1	slx3	Co-purification	physical	Sanyal S (2018)	29898918	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545574	2542883	2542747	279328	279197	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC15A10.06	alm1	SPAC15A10.06	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545575	2542883	2539900	279328	276446	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC17D11.02c	alm1	hrd1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545576	2542883	2542889	279328	279333	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC8E11.04c	alm1	SPAC8E11.04c	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545577	2541652	2539938	278148	276482	SPAC24B11.06c	SPBC17D11.05	sty1	tif32	phh1|spc1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Asp E (2008)	18065650	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545578	2540557	2541929	277084	278417	SPBC29A10.04	SPAC23C4.12	psm1	hhp2	smc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545579	2542744	2542667	279194	279120	SPAC1565.08	SPAC26A3.16	cdc48	dph1	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	ucp5	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545580	2540542	2542140	277069	278616	SPBC29A10.12	SPAC1783.07c	SPBC29A10.12	pap1	-	caf3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	He Y (2017)	27664222	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545581	2538734	2542896	275318	279340	SPCC1322.13	SPAC3F10.04	ade6	gsa1	min1	gsh2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chaudhuri B (1997)	9017391	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545582	2542744	2539821	279194	276371	SPAC1565.08	SPBC1711.10c	cdc48	npl4	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545583	9406966	2540627	1028329	277153	SPCC16C4.22	SPBC25H2.13c	SPCC16C4.22	cdc20	SPNCRNA.470|SPNG2185	pol2	Co-purification	physical	He H (2017)	29109278	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545584	2540329	2542140	276859	278616	SPBC29B5.01	SPAC1783.07c	atf1	pap1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	caf3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Dunand-Sauthier I (2005)	16278445	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545585	2540718	2540718	277241	277241	SPBC3H7.15	SPBC3H7.15	hhp1	hhp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545586	2541347	2540627	277858	277153	SPBP8B7.14c	SPBC25H2.13c	dpb2	cdc20	-	pol2	Two-hybrid	physical	Handa T (2012)	22718908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545587	2540473	2539442	277001	276005	SPBC30D10.10c	SPCC5E4.04	tor1	cut1	-	ptr4	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Ikai N (2011)	22645648	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545588	2538740	2539205	275323	275775	SPCC794.08	SPCC4B3.15	efr3	mid1	SPCC794.08	dmf1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Snider CE (2017)	28784611	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545589	2538740	2541889	275323	278379	SPCC794.08	SPAC2F7.03c	efr3	pom1	SPCC794.08	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Snider CE (2017)	28784611	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545590	2539189	2539726	275760	276278	SPCC1682.16	SPBC13E7.08c	rpt4	leo1	SPCC306.01	SPBC13E7.08c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Seo HD (2018)	29214404	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance|protein/peptide accumulation	-	-	POMBASE
2545591	2538852	2541929	275433	278417	SPCC4E9.01c	SPAC23C4.12	rec11	hhp2	SPCC550.16c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545592	2543554	2540718	279971	277241	SPAC4H3.11c	SPBC3H7.15	ppc89	hhp1	mug127	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Elmore ZC (2018)	29742018	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545593	2543492	2540135	279912	276672	SPAC890.07c	SPBC16C6.11	rmt1	rpl3201	prmt1	rpl32-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Perreault A (2007)	17213188	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545594	2541929	2541929	278417	278417	SPAC23C4.12	SPAC23C4.12	hhp2	hhp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545595	2543010	2541929	279448	278417	SPAC10F6.09c	SPAC23C4.12	psm3	hhp2	smc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545596	2539579	2539004	276138	275578	SPCP31B10.05	SPCC4G3.05c	tdp1	mus81	-	slx3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ganguly A (2018)	30148840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545597	2539579	2542007	276138	278490	SPCP31B10.05	SPAC20H4.07	tdp1	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ganguly A (2018)	30148840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545598	2542036	2542925	278518	279366	SPAC23A1.19c	SPAC11E3.04c	hrq1	ubc13	SPAC23A1.19c|SPAC26H5.01c	spu13|sst5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ganguly A (2018)	30148840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545599	2540966	2540368	277482	276897	SPBC3D6.09	SPBC36.05c	dpb4	clr6	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	He H (2017)	29109278	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545600	2540458	2541929	276986	278417	SPBC29A10.14	SPAC23C4.12	rec8	hhp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545601	2542222	2540585	278695	277111	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC28F2.04c	sde2	cwf7	-	spf27	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545602	2541603	2539205	278100	275775	SPAC1F5.04c	SPCC4B3.15	cdc12	mid1	-	dmf1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Willet AH (2018)	29343550	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545603	2542032	2539004	278514	275578	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC4G3.05c	pnk1	mus81	-	slx3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sanchez A (2017)	28922417	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545604	2540398	2541941	276926	278428	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC20H4.03c	dis3	tfs1	rrp44	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Lemay JF (2014)	25240800	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545605	2540620	2540627	277146	277153	SPBC4.04c	SPBC25H2.13c	mcm2	cdc20	cdc19|nda1	pol2	Two-hybrid	physical	Handa T (2012)	22718908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545606	2542744	2539364	279194	275930	SPAC1565.08	SPCC4G3.12c	cdc48	SPCC4G3.12c	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545607	2540557	2540718	277084	277241	SPBC29A10.04	SPBC3H7.15	psm1	hhp1	smc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545608	2542883	2541804	279328	278295	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC29A4.18	alm1	prw1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545609	2542744	2539900	279194	276446	SPAC1565.08	SPBC17D11.02c	cdc48	hrd1	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545610	2538852	2540718	275433	277241	SPCC4E9.01c	SPBC3H7.15	rec11	hhp1	SPCC550.16c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545611	2542883	3361502	279328	280578	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC19A8.01c	alm1	sec73	-	SPAC23H3.01|sec7c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545612	2539733	2543492	276285	279912	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC890.07c	pab2	rmt1	-	prmt1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Perreault A (2007)	17213188	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545613	2541929	2540718	278417	277241	SPAC23C4.12	SPBC3H7.15	hhp2	hhp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545614	2542883	2540494	279328	277022	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC409.04c	alm1	mis12	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545615	2542883	2539729	279328	276281	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC11B10.07c	alm1	ivn1	-	pi004|SPACTOKYO_453.33c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545616	2542129	2541378	278605	277889	SPAC17G8.12	SPBP8B7.21	sec3	ubp3	SPAC17G8.12	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kampmeyer C (2017)	28765280	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545617	2543010	2540718	279448	277241	SPAC10F6.09c	SPBC3H7.15	psm3	hhp1	smc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545618	2542544	2539375	279001	275941	SPAC18G6.10	SPCC4G3.11	lem2	mug154	heh1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Banday S (2016)	27451393	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545619	2542544	2540329	279001	276859	SPAC18G6.10	SPBC29B5.01	lem2	atf1	heh1	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Barrales RR (2016)	26744419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545620	2542544	2539375	279001	275941	SPAC18G6.10	SPCC4G3.11	lem2	mug154	heh1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Barrales RR (2016)	26744419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545621	2542129	2540956	278605	277472	SPAC17G8.12	SPBC409.06	sec3	uch2	SPAC17G8.12	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kampmeyer C (2017)	28765280	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545622	2541368	2540627	277879	277153	SPBP4H10.21c	SPBC25H2.13c	sld5	cdc20	-	pol2	Two-hybrid	physical	Handa T (2012)	22718908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545623	2540458	2540718	276986	277241	SPBC29A10.14	SPBC3H7.15	rec8	hhp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545624	2540255	2539686	276786	276241	SPBC336.04	SPBC1734.06	cdc6	rhp18	mis10|pol3|pold	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Daigaku Y (2017)	28481910	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	POMBASE
2545625	2540718	2541929	277241	278417	SPBC3H7.15	SPAC23C4.12	hhp1	hhp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545626	2541120	2542925	277635	279366	SPBC649.03	SPAC11E3.04c	rhp14	ubc13	-	spu13|sst5	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ganguly A (2018)	30148840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545627	2539027	2539938	275600	276482	SPCC1322.08	SPBC17D11.05	srk1	tif32	mkp1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Asp E (2008)	18065650	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545628	2543554	2541929	279971	278417	SPAC4H3.11c	SPAC23C4.12	ppc89	hhp2	mug127	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Elmore ZC (2018)	29742018	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545629	2540630	2540627	277156	277153	SPBC25D12.03c	SPBC25H2.13c	mcm7	cdc20	-	pol2	Two-hybrid	physical	Handa T (2012)	22718908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545630	2538994	2542007	275568	278490	SPCC553.01c	SPAC20H4.07	dbl2	rad57	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Polakova S (2016)	27304859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545631	2541542	2540252	278042	276784	SPAC4G9.02	SPBC336.06c	rnh201	rnh1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Zhao H (2018)	29622660	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545632	2541474	2540627	277976	277153	SPAC227.16c	SPBC25H2.13c	psf3	cdc20	-	pol2	Two-hybrid	physical	Handa T (2012)	22718908	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545634	2540966	2540627	277482	277153	SPBC3D6.09	SPBC25H2.13c	dpb4	cdc20	-	pol2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	He H (2017)	29109278	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545635	2542427	2539317	278889	275883	SPAC6F6.12	SPCC16A11.08	SPAC6F6.12	atg20	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhao D (2016)	27737912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545636	2542883	2540032	279328	276575	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC1703.14c	alm1	top1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545637	2541942	2542481	278429	278941	SPAC222.09	SPAC29A4.04c	seb1	cbf5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemay JF (2016)	27401558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545638	2541942	2541530	278429	278030	SPAC222.09	SPAC57A10.10c	seb1	sla1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemay JF (2016)	27401558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545639	2542883	2540895	279328	277411	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC577.15c	alm1	sim3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545640	2542883	2543534	279328	279951	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC926.05c	alm1	dph4	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545641	2542427	2539317	278889	275883	SPAC6F6.12	SPCC16A11.08	SPAC6F6.12	atg20	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhao D (2016)	27737912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545642	2542427	2539317	278889	275883	SPAC6F6.12	SPCC16A11.08	SPAC6F6.12	atg20	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Zhao D (2016)	27737912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545643	2539824	2539317	276374	275883	SPBC1711.11	SPCC16A11.08	SPBC1711.11	atg20	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhao D (2016)	27737912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545644	2543425	2539461	279845	276024	SPAC4F10.07c	SPCC63.08c	atg13	atg1	apg13|mug78	cvt10|ppk36	Co-purification	physical	Nanji T (2017)	28976798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545645	2539824	2539317	276374	275883	SPBC1711.11	SPCC16A11.08	SPBC1711.11	atg20	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhao D (2016)	27737912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545646	2539824	2539317	276374	275883	SPBC1711.11	SPCC16A11.08	SPBC1711.11	atg20	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Zhao D (2016)	27737912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545647	2542194	2540212	278669	276745	SPAC17G6.17	SPBC9B6.05c	pof8	lsm3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Collopy LC (2018)	29422501	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545648	2543058	2540029	279492	276573	SPAC3G6.02	SPBC16A3.01	rpn15	spn3	dss1|sem1	SPBC543.01c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545649	2542723	2539461	279174	276024	SPAC25H1.03	SPCC63.08c	atg101	atg1	mug66	cvt10|ppk36	Co-purification	physical	Nanji T (2017)	28976798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545650	2540718	2543554	277241	279971	SPBC3H7.15	SPAC4H3.11c	hhp1	ppc89	-	mug127	Two-hybrid	physical	Elmore ZC (2018)	29742018	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545651	2542744	2541425	279194	277930	SPAC1565.08	SPAC2C4.17c	cdc48	msy2	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	SPAC2C4.17c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545652	2540557	2543010	277084	279448	SPBC29A10.04	SPAC10F6.09c	psm1	psm3	smc1	smc3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545653	2538852	2543010	275433	279448	SPCC4E9.01c	SPAC10F6.09c	rec11	psm3	SPCC550.16c	smc3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545654	2541929	2543010	278417	279448	SPAC23C4.12	SPAC10F6.09c	hhp2	psm3	-	smc3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545655	3361384	2539423	280460	275988	SPAC12G12.13c	SPCC663.12	cid14	cid12	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Pisacane P (2017)	28541282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545656	2543010	2543010	279448	279448	SPAC10F6.09c	SPAC10F6.09c	psm3	psm3	smc3	smc3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545657	2540458	2543010	276986	279448	SPBC29A10.14	SPAC10F6.09c	rec8	psm3	-	smc3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545658	2540856	2543576	277373	279991	SPBC4F6.12	SPAC4A8.05c	pxl1	myp2	-	myo3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ge W (2008)	18272786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545659	2541840	2540559	278331	277086	SPAC23H3.03c	SPBC26H8.04c	npr2	SPBC26H8.04c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545660	2541840	2540559	278331	277086	SPAC23H3.03c	SPBC26H8.04c	npr2	SPBC26H8.04c	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545661	2543382	2540320	279804	276850	SPAC890.02c	SPBC3D6.04c	alp7	mad1	mia1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sato M (2003)	12951601	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545662	2541163	2543549	277678	279966	SPBC83.15	SPAC890.04c	SPBC83.15	SPAC890.04c	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kawashima SA (2016)	27667686	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545663	2542032	2539579	278514	276138	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCP31B10.05	pnk1	tdp1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ganguly A (2018)	30148840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545664	2540712	5802757	277235	857895	SPBC216.02	SPBC646.17c	mcp5	dic1	mug21|num1	SPBC855.01c|SPBP35G2.01c|mug44	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Fujita I (2015)	25736293	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545665	2542744	2543170	279194	279601	SPAC1565.08	SPAC343.09	cdc48	ubx3	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	mug39	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545666	2539542	2543549	276104	279966	SPCC4G3.18	SPAC890.04c	rix1	SPAC890.04c	SPCC4G3.18	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kawashima SA (2016)	27667686	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545667	2542883	2540320	279328	276850	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC3D6.04c	alm1	mad1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545668	2539505	2539497	276068	276060	SPCC736.14	SPCC895.07	dis1	alp14	-	mtc1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Matsuo Y (2016)	27872152	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545669	2542883	2540355	279328	276884	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC25B2.11	alm1	pof2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545670	2542883	2543449	279328	279869	SPAC1486.04c	SPAPB1A10.02	alm1	scm3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545671	2540718	2543010	277241	279448	SPBC3H7.15	SPAC10F6.09c	hhp1	psm3	-	smc3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545672	2541929	2543554	278417	279971	SPAC23C4.12	SPAC4H3.11c	hhp2	ppc89	-	mug127	Two-hybrid	physical	Elmore ZC (2018)	29742018	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545673	2540464	2542196	276992	278671	SPBC23E6.02	SPAC30D11.13	rrp2	hus5	SPBC23E6.02	ubc9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Wei Y (2017)	28552615	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545674	2539579	2540032	276138	276575	SPCP31B10.05	SPBC1703.14c	tdp1	top1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ganguly A (2018)	30148840	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545675	2542544	2539497	279001	276060	SPAC18G6.10	SPCC895.07	lem2	alp14	heh1	mtc1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Barrales RR (2016)	26744419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545676	2541073	2540559	277588	277086	SPBC543.04	SPBC26H8.04c	SPBC543.04	SPBC26H8.04c	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545677	2538740	2543221	275323	279649	SPCC794.08	SPAC637.04	efr3	SPAC637.04	SPCC794.08	-	Co-purification	physical	Snider CE (2017)	28784611	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545678	2538740	2543221	275323	279649	SPCC794.08	SPAC637.04	efr3	SPAC637.04	SPCC794.08	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snider CE (2017)	28784611	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545679	2538736	2540320	275320	276850	SPCC1322.12c	SPBC3D6.04c	bub1	mad1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mora-Santos MD (2016)	27618268	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545680	2540720	2541530	277243	278030	SPBC216.07c	SPAC57A10.10c	tor2	sla1	SPBC646.01c	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Otsubo Y (2018)	29330317	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545681	2540720	2540559	277243	277086	SPBC216.07c	SPBC26H8.04c	tor2	SPBC26H8.04c	SPBC646.01c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545682	2542222	2540865	278695	277382	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC4B4.07c	sde2	usp102	-	mud1|U1A	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545683	2542222	2538931	278695	275507	SPAC31G5.18c	SPCC1620.10	sde2	cwf26	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545684	2541163	2539968	277678	276512	SPBC83.15	SPBC16E9.10c	SPBC83.15	SPBC16E9.10c	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kawashima SA (2016)	27667686	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545685	2542883	2539983	279328	276527	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC1604.18c	alm1	SPBC1604.18c	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545686	2542883	2541287	279328	277800	SPAC1486.04c	SPBP22H7.05c	alm1	abo2	-	SPBP22H7.05c|pi026|SPACTOKYO_453.08	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545687	2542883	2541531	279328	278031	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC25A8.01c	alm1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545688	2542883	2540930	279328	277446	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC354.10	alm1	def1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545689	2542883	2541068	279328	277583	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC530.11c	alm1	SPBC530.11c	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545690	2541942	2540213	278429	276746	SPAC222.09	SPBC17D1.06	seb1	dbp3	-	SPCC17D1.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemay JF (2016)	27401558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545691	2542883	2542398	279328	278862	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC1805.03c	alm1	trm13	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545692	2542883	2539792	279328	276342	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC1271.14	alm1	SPBC1271.14	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545693	2543240	3361323	279668	280399	SPAC694.06c	SPBC30D10.04	mrc1	swi3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Shimmoto M (2009)	19422421	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545694	2541942	2538897	278429	275475	SPAC222.09	SPCC1183.07	seb1	SPCC1183.07	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemay JF (2016)	27401558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545695	2542744	2540287	279194	276818	SPAC1565.08	SPBC29A10.08	cdc48	gas2	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545696	2542129	2540987	278605	277503	SPAC17G8.12	SPBC36B7.05c	sec3	SPBC36B7.05c	SPAC17G8.12	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kampmeyer C (2017)	28765280	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545697	2540560	2542179	277087	278654	SPBC2D10.14c	SPAC17C9.12	myo51	scs22	-	SPAC17C9.12	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ng AYE (2018)	29290560	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545698	2540389	2540884	276917	277401	SPBC31E1.03	SPBC19C2.14	hub1	smd3	ubl4	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545699	2540520	2540778	277048	277297	SPBC3D6.08c	SPBC19G7.10c	lsm1	SPBC19G7.10c	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang CY (2017)	28031482	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545700	2543492	2541071	279912	277586	SPAC890.07c	SPBC582.05c	rmt1	brc1	prmt1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Perreault A (2007)	17213188	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545701	2540719	2540719	277242	277242	SPBC216.05	SPBC216.05	rad3	rad3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bentley NJ (1996)	8978690	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545702	2540778	2540778	277297	277297	SPBC19G7.10c	SPBC19G7.10c	SPBC19G7.10c	SPBC19G7.10c	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Wang CY (2017)	28031482	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545703	2543492	2540905	279912	277421	SPAC890.07c	SPBC530.06c	rmt1	clu1	prmt1	SPBC530.06c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Perreault A (2007)	17213188	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545704	2539009	2539875	275582	276421	SPCC1739.04c	SPBC16A3.12c	SPCC1739.04c	SPBC16A3.12c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Blyth J (2018)	29259000	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545705	2539123	2539741	275695	276293	SPCC18B5.03	SPBC16A3.05c	wee1	rae1	-	cut21	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Whalen WA (1997)	9301023	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545706	2541798	2540719	278289	277242	SPAC22F3.03c	SPBC216.05	rdh54	rad3	mug34|tid1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Moiseeva V (2017)	29123917	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545707	2541973	2540719	278458	277242	SPAC6G9.13c	SPBC216.05	bqt1	rad3	mug23|rec26	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Moiseeva V (2017)	29123917	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545708	2538846	2540009	275427	276553	SPCC1919.10c	SPBC16G5.05c	myo52	scs2	-	SPBC16G5.05c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ng AYE (2018)	29290560	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545709	2543577	2540719	279992	277242	SPAC4H3.05	SPBC216.05	srs2	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yasuhira S (2009)	19205745	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545710	2543385	2539576	279807	276136	SPAC4G9.12	SPCC794.01c	SPAC4G9.12	zwf2	-	SPCC794.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Corkins ME (2017)	28667014	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545711	2539487	2540009	276050	276553	SPCC895.05	SPBC16G5.05c	for3	scs2	-	SPBC16G5.05c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ng AYE (2018)	29290560	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545712	2540654	2540580	277179	277106	SPBC19F5.01c	SPBC19C2.05	puc1	ran1	SPBP8B7.32c	pat1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Caligiuri M (1997)	9201720	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545713	2542054	2542544	278533	279001	SPAC2G11.06	SPAC18G6.10	vps4	lem2	-	heh1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Gu M (2017)	28242692	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545714	2542222	2540884	278695	277401	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC19C2.14	sde2	smd3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545715	2542222	2541289	278695	277802	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBP35G2.09	sde2	usp103	-	yhc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545716	2542032	2541071	278514	277586	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC582.05c	pnk1	brc1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sanchez A (2017)	28922417	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545717	2540115	2542414	276652	278878	SPBC1778.02	SPAC6F6.16c	rap1	tpz1	-	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Kim JK (2017)	29149597	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545718	2540234	2540013	276766	276557	SPBC336.12c	SPBC14C8.07c	cdc10	cdc18	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kelly TJ (1993)	7916658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545719	2542744	2540645	279194	277170	SPAC1565.08	SPBC21B10.05c	cdc48	pop3	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	wat1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545720	2540560	2540009	277087	276553	SPBC2D10.14c	SPBC16G5.05c	myo51	scs2	-	SPBC16G5.05c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ng AYE (2018)	29290560	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545721	2541455	2540429	277958	276957	SPAC6G9.06c	SPBC29A10.07	pcp1	pom152	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Fong CS (2010)	19942852	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545722	2543164	3361323	279595	280399	SPAC3G6.06c	SPBC30D10.04	rad2	swi3	fen1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Koulintchenko M (2012)	23071723	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545723	2542883	2541193	279328	277707	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC776.02c	alm1	dis2	-	bws1|sds1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545724	2542883	2539667	279328	276222	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC13G1.08c	alm1	ash2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545725	2542883	2543667	279328	280081	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC4H3.02c	alm1	swc3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545726	2542883	2542552	279328	279009	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC1B1.04c	alm1	pan3	-	SPAC1B1.04c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545727	2542883	2540662	279328	277187	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC19G7.02	alm1	SPBC19G7.02	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545728	2542883	2540905	279328	277421	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC530.06c	alm1	clu1	-	SPBC530.06c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545729	2542883	2542775	279328	279224	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC15E1.05c	alm1	ect1	-	SPAC15E1.05c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545730	2542883	2542107	279328	278583	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC30.01c	alm1	sec72	-	sec7b|sec702	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545731	2541942	2540292	278429	276823	SPAC222.09	SPBC28F2.12	seb1	rpb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemay JF (2016)	27401558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545732	2541942	2540292	278429	276823	SPAC222.09	SPBC28F2.12	seb1	rpb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lemay JF (2016)	27401558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545733	2542544	2538940	279001	275515	SPAC18G6.10	SPCC1620.07c	lem2	lnp1	heh1	SPCC1620.07c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Barrales RR (2016)	26744419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545734	2541071	2540719	277586	277242	SPBC582.05c	SPBC216.05	brc1	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2017)	28922417	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545735	2540954	2541869	277470	278359	SPBC337.13c	SPAC22F3.13	gtr1	tsc1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545736	2542054	2539983	278533	276527	SPAC2G11.06	SPBC1604.18c	vps4	SPBC1604.18c	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Gu M (2017)	28242692	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545737	2541165	3361323	277680	280399	SPBC776.12c	SPBC30D10.04	hsk1	swi3	cdc7	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Shimmoto M (2009)	19422421	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545738	2542032	2540719	278514	277242	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC216.05	pnk1	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2017)	28922417	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545739	3361487	2540778	280563	277297	SPAC1805.17	SPBC19G7.10c	crm1	SPBC19G7.10c	SPAC1B2.01|caf2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang CY (2017)	28031482	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545740	2541386	2543068	277897	279501	SPBP8B7.24c	SPAC30D11.06c	atg8	hfl1	-	SPAC30D11.06c	Co-purification	physical	Liu XM (2018)	30451685	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545741	2542883	2540589	279328	277115	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC20F10.06	alm1	mad2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545742	2542883	2541282	279328	277795	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC902.03	alm1	SPBC902.03	-	psp7	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545743	2542883	2543106	279328	279538	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC3A11.13	alm1	SPAC3A11.13	-	SPAC3H5.02	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545744	2542883	2542568	279328	279024	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC1952.02	alm1	tma23	-	SPAC1952.02	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545745	2542883	2541556	279328	278055	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC6G9.10c	alm1	sen1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545746	2542883	2540230	279328	276762	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC32F12.05c	alm1	cwf12	-	isy1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545747	2542883	2541905	279328	278395	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC6G9.01c	alm1	SPAC6G9.01c	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545748	2542883	2539173	279328	275744	SPAC1486.04c	SPCC965.11c	alm1	agp3	-	SPCC965.11c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545749	2542883	2542307	279328	278774	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC16A10.03c	alm1	SPAC16A10.03c	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545750	2542883	2539198	279328	275769	SPAC1486.04c	SPCC18.09c	alm1	hnt3	-	SPCC18.09c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545751	2542883	2539906	279328	276452	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC16G5.17	alm1	SPBC16G5.17	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545752	2540369	2540589	276898	277115	SPBC27B12.02	SPBC20F10.06	mis19	mad2	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Hirai H (2014)	25375240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545753	2540954	2540833	277470	277351	SPBC337.13c	SPBC18H10.20c	gtr1	any1	-	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545754	2542244	2542414	278714	278878	SPAC19G12.13c	SPAC6F6.16c	poz1	tpz1	-	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kim JK (2017)	29149597	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545755	2538846	2542179	275427	278654	SPCC1919.10c	SPAC17C9.12	myo52	scs22	-	SPAC17C9.12	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ng AYE (2018)	29290560	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545756	2539487	2542179	276050	278654	SPCC895.05	SPAC17C9.12	for3	scs22	-	SPAC17C9.12	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ng AYE (2018)	29290560	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545757	2538822	2540635	275403	277161	SPCC1840.02c	SPBC23G7.08c	bgs4	rga7	cwg1|orb11|pbr1|sph1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Arasada R (2015)	25977474	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545758	2540557	2540458	277084	276986	SPBC29A10.04	SPBC29A10.14	psm1	rec8	smc1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545759	2540559	2540833	277086	277351	SPBC26H8.04c	SPBC18H10.20c	SPBC26H8.04c	any1	-	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545760	2539542	2539491	276104	276054	SPCC4G3.18	SPCC737.08	rix1	SPCC737.08	SPCC4G3.18	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Kawashima SA (2016)	27667686	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545761	2540389	2543583	276917	279998	SPBC31E1.03	SPAC644.12	hub1	cdc5	ubl4	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545762	2538852	2540458	275433	276986	SPCC4E9.01c	SPBC29A10.14	rec11	rec8	SPCC550.16c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545763	2540966	2541301	277482	277813	SPBC3D6.09	SPBP23A10.05	dpb4	ssr4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	He H (2017)	29109278	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545764	2543164	2540728	279595	277251	SPAC3G6.06c	SPBC216.06c	rad2	swi1	fen1	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Koulintchenko M (2012)	23071723	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545765	2541929	2540458	278417	276986	SPAC23C4.12	SPBC29A10.14	hhp2	rec8	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545766	2538736	2540589	275320	277115	SPCC1322.12c	SPBC20F10.06	bub1	mad2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mora-Santos MD (2016)	27618268	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545767	2540464	2541580	276992	278077	SPBC23E6.02	SPAC1687.05	rrp2	pli1	SPBC23E6.02	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Wei Y (2017)	28552615	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545768	2539433	2539869	275996	276415	SPCC4E9.02	SPBC11B10.09	cig1	cdc2	SPCC645.01	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Caligiuri M (1997)	9201720	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545769	2543481	2539869	279901	276415	SPAPB2B4.03	SPBC11B10.09	cig2	cdc2	cyc17	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Caligiuri M (1997)	9201720	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545770	2543010	2540458	279448	276986	SPAC10F6.09c	SPBC29A10.14	psm3	rec8	smc3	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545771	2540458	2540458	276986	276986	SPBC29A10.14	SPBC29A10.14	rec8	rec8	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545772	2541840	2541682	278331	278178	SPAC23H3.03c	SPAC15F9.02	npr2	seh1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545773	3361566	2541031	280642	277546	SPAC29B12.01	SPBC365.10	ino80	arp5	SPAC3G6.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hogan CJ (2010)	19933844	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545774	3361566	2541077	280642	277592	SPAC29B12.01	SPBC83.08	ino80	rvb2	SPAC3G6.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hogan CJ (2010)	19933844	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545775	2541018	2540589	277533	277115	SPBC3B9.11c	SPBC20F10.06	ctf1	mad2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sonkar A (2017)	28567704	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545776	2541620	2540728	278117	277251	SPAC2G11.12	SPBC216.06c	rqh1	swi1	hus2|rad12|rec9	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yasuhira S (2009)	19205745	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545777	2538913	2542126	275490	278602	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC1B3.05	ccr4	not3	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Webster MW (2018)	29932902	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545778	2542744	2542598	279194	279052	SPAC1565.08	SPAC6G10.08	cdc48	idp1	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545779	2542222	2543583	278695	279998	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC644.12	sde2	cdc5	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545780	2539540	2540825	276102	277343	SPCC736.12c	SPBC428.08c	mmi1	clr4	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Touat-Todeschini L (2017)	28765164	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545781	2542744	2540613	279194	277139	SPAC1565.08	SPBC216.03	cdc48	SPBC216.03	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545782	2542222	2538936	278695	275512	SPAC31G5.18c	SPCC10H11.01	sde2	prp11	-	prp5	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545783	2542222	2542461	278695	278922	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC19A8.13	sde2	usp101	-	snp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545784	2541165	2540728	277680	277251	SPBC776.12c	SPBC216.06c	hsk1	swi1	cdc7	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Shimmoto M (2009)	19422421	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545785	2540389	2540230	276917	276762	SPBC31E1.03	SPBC32F12.05c	hub1	cwf12	ubl4	isy1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545786	2542032	2543580	278514	279995	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC644.14c	pnk1	rad51	-	rhp51	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2017)	28922417	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545787	2542032	2541620	278514	278117	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAC2G11.12	pnk1	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sanchez A (2017)	28922417	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545788	2542300	2542126	278767	278602	SPAC1687.22c	SPAC1B3.05	puf3	not3	SPAC222.02c	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Webster MW (2019)	30601114	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545789	2542883	2542059	279328	278537	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC328.06	alm1	ubp2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545790	2540252	2541542	276784	278042	SPBC336.06c	SPAC4G9.02	rnh1	rnh201	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Zhao H (2018)	29622660	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545791	2540252	2541542	276784	278042	SPBC336.06c	SPAC4G9.02	rnh1	rnh201	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Zhao H (2018)	29622660	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545792	2541942	2542314	278429	278780	SPAC222.09	SPAC16E8.06c	seb1	nop12	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemay JF (2016)	27401558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545793	2542883	2539620	279328	276178	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC1861.01c	alm1	cnp3	-	SPBC56F2.13	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545794	2543240	2540728	279668	277251	SPAC694.06c	SPBC216.06c	mrc1	swi1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Shimmoto M (2009)	19422421	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545795	2542129	2542919	278605	279360	SPAC17G8.12	SPAC6C3.08	sec3	nas6	SPAC17G8.12	SPAC6C3.08	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kampmeyer C (2017)	28765280	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545796	2540718	2540458	277241	276986	SPBC3H7.15	SPBC29A10.14	hhp1	rec8	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Phadnis N (2015)	25993311	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545797	2540654	2539869	277179	276415	SPBC19F5.01c	SPBC11B10.09	puc1	cdc2	SPBP8B7.32c	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Caligiuri M (1997)	9201720	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545798	2542222	2540230	278695	276762	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC32F12.05c	sde2	cwf12	-	isy1	Co-purification	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545799	2542222	2542531	278695	278989	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC3A12.11c	sde2	cwf2	-	prp3|cwc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545800	2542222	2540230	278695	276762	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC32F12.05c	sde2	cwf12	-	isy1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545801	2542222	2542369	278695	278833	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC1782.10c	sde2	nhp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545802	2542222	2541487	278695	277989	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC23D3.08	sde2	usp108	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545803	2540255	2540020	276786	276564	SPBC336.04	SPBC16D10.09	cdc6	pcn1	mis10|pol3|pold	pcn	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Daigaku Y (2017)	28481910	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545804	2540255	2540020	276786	276564	SPBC336.04	SPBC16D10.09	cdc6	pcn1	mis10|pol3|pold	pcn	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Daigaku Y (2017)	28481910	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	POMBASE
2545805	2540013	2543289	276557	279714	SPBC14C8.07c	SPAC9E9.08	cdc18	rad26	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Hermand D (2007)	17531813	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545806	2540013	2543289	276557	279714	SPBC14C8.07c	SPAC9E9.08	cdc18	rad26	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Hermand D (2007)	17531813	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545807	2540719	2541620	277242	278117	SPBC216.05	SPAC2G11.12	rad3	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yasuhira S (2009)	19205745	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545808	2539958	2542126	276502	278602	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC1B3.05	zfs1	not3	moc4	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Webster MW (2019)	30601114	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545809	2542883	2542157	279328	278633	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC6F6.09	alm1	eaf6	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545810	2542883	2540128	279328	276665	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC15D4.03	alm1	slm9	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545811	2541942	2541280	278429	277793	SPAC222.09	SPBP23A10.07	seb1	rpa2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemay JF (2016)	27401558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545812	2543240	2539087	279668	275659	SPAC694.06c	SPCC1259.13	mrc1	chk1	-	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Alcasabas AA (2001)	11715016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545813	2542883	2543358	279328	279780	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC688.10	alm1	rev3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545814	2543577	2543289	279992	279714	SPAC4H3.05	SPAC9E9.08	srs2	rad26	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Yasuhira S (2009)	19205745	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545815	2543577	2540728	279992	277251	SPAC4H3.05	SPBC216.06c	srs2	swi1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yasuhira S (2009)	19205745	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545816	3361566	2543563	280642	279979	SPAC29B12.01	SPAC664.02c	ino80	arp8	SPAC3G6.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hogan CJ (2010)	19933844	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545817	2541635	2541849	278131	278340	SPAC1556.01c	SPAC20G8.01	rad50	cdc17	SPAP4C9.01c	SPAC57A10.13c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Zhu M (2018)	30104346	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545818	2541052	2540927	277567	277443	SPBC409.12c	SPBC365.06	stn1	pmt3	-	smt3|ubl2	Two-hybrid	physical	Matmati S (2018)	29774234	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545819	2538775	2539090	275357	275662	SPCC23B6.05c	SPCC126.02c	ssb3	pku70	rpa3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Teixeira-Silva A (2017)	29215009	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545820	3361384	2542198	280460	278673	SPAC12G12.13c	SPAC6F12.09	cid14	rdp1	-	rdr1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Pisacane P (2017)	28541282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545821	2541798	2539087	278289	275659	SPAC22F3.03c	SPCC1259.13	rdh54	chk1	mug34|tid1	rad27	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Moiseeva V (2017)	29123917	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545822	2542744	2543597	279194	280012	SPAC1565.08	SPAC4A8.12c	cdc48	sds22	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545823	2541934	2542599	278422	279053	SPAC222.11	SPAC13A11.02c	hem13	erg11	-	cyp51	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Singh A (2017)	28893786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545824	2538736	2542226	275320	278699	SPCC1322.12c	SPAC19G12.06c	bub1	hta2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kawashima SA (2010)	19965387	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545825	2541699	2543129	278195	279561	SPAP8A3.08	SPAC4F8.13c	cdc4	rng2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	D'souza VM (2001)	11942609	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545826	2542070	2540309	278547	276839	SPAC29B12.02c	SPBC21B10.13c	set2	yox1	kmt3	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Pai CC (2017)	28903048	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545827	3361566	2539226	280642	275796	SPAC29B12.01	SPCC16C4.20c	ino80	SPCC16C4.20c	SPAC3G6.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hogan CJ (2010)	19933844	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545828	3361566	2541424	280642	277929	SPAC29B12.01	SPAC23G3.04	ino80	ies4	SPAC3G6.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hogan CJ (2010)	19933844	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545829	2541840	3361381	278331	280457	SPAC23H3.03c	SPAC12G12.01c	npr2	SPAC12G12.01c	-	SPAC630.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545830	2540347	2542198	276876	278673	SPBC30B4.08	SPAC6F12.09	eri1	rdp1	-	rdr1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Iida T (2006)	16797182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545831	2540234	2541424	276766	277929	SPBC336.12c	SPAC23G3.04	cdc10	ies4	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Knezevic I (2018)	30134042	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545832	2540234	2541424	276766	277929	SPBC336.12c	SPAC23G3.04	cdc10	ies4	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Knezevic I (2018)	30134042	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545833	2542744	2540575	279194	277102	SPAC1565.08	SPBC21C3.11	cdc48	ubx4	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545834	2542744	2540927	279194	277443	SPAC1565.08	SPBC365.06	cdc48	pmt3	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	smt3|ubl2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545835	2540856	2543129	277373	279561	SPBC4F6.12	SPAC4F8.13c	pxl1	rng2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ge W (2008)	18272786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545836	2539438	2541369	276001	277880	SPCC4B3.07	SPBP4H10.13	nro1	rps2302	-	rps23-2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Clasen SJ (2017)	29083304	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545837	2540464	2540927	276992	277443	SPBC23E6.02	SPBC365.06	rrp2	pmt3	SPBC23E6.02	smt3|ubl2	Two-hybrid	physical	Wei Y (2017)	28552615	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545838	2542222	2541609	278695	278106	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC22F8.10c	sde2	sap145	-	SF3b145	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545839	2542222	2540330	278695	276860	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC3E7.14	sde2	smf1	-	SPBC4F6.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545840	2538706	2539090	275290	275662	SPCC338.08	SPCC126.02c	ctp1	pku70	mug38|nip1|slr9	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Teixeira-Silva A (2017)	29215009	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545841	14218092	2539088	4254454	275660	SPAC222.19	SPCC777.05	tam1	gtr2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545842	2540856	2541940	277373	278427	SPBC4F6.12	SPAC27F1.02c	pxl1	cdc8	-	fus4	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ge W (2008)	18272786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545843	2540856	2539360	277373	275926	SPBC4F6.12	SPCC613.04c	pxl1	rng3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Ge W (2008)	18272786	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545844	2542300	2538913	278767	275490	SPAC1687.22c	SPCC31H12.08c	puf3	ccr4	SPAC222.02c	SPCC5E4.02c	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Webster MW (2019)	30601114	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545845	2542883	2540543	279328	277070	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC29A10.06c	alm1	ely5	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545846	2542222	2543616	278695	280030	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC4A8.09c	sde2	cwf21	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545847	2542222	2543616	278695	280030	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC4A8.09c	sde2	cwf21	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545848	2542222	2542480	278695	278940	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC2C4.03c	sde2	smd2	-	cwf9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545849	2542732	2539778	279182	276328	SPAC25G10.07c	SPBC15D4.01c	cut7	klp9	-	SPBC2D10.21c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Yukawa M (2017)	29021344	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545850	2542883	2539006	279328	275579	SPAC1486.04c	SPCC24B10.11c	alm1	mft1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545851	2542883	2542951	279328	279391	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC1071.05	alm1	SPAC1071.05	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545852	2541158	2539090	277673	275662	SPBC660.13c	SPCC126.02c	ssb1	pku70	rad11|rpa1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Teixeira-Silva A (2017)	29215009	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545853	2540954	2539088	277470	275660	SPBC337.13c	SPCC777.05	gtr1	gtr2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545854	2540131	2539088	276668	275660	SPBC1778.05c	SPCC777.05	SPBC1778.05c	gtr2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545855	9407207	2539088	1028570	275660	SPAC23D3.16	SPCC777.05	SPAC23D3.16	gtr2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545856	2541635	2539090	278131	275662	SPAC1556.01c	SPCC126.02c	rad50	pku70	SPAP4C9.01c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Teixeira-Silva A (2017)	29215009	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545857	2541179	2541369	277693	277880	SPBC6B1.08c	SPBP4H10.13	ofd1	rps2302	-	rps23-2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Clasen SJ (2017)	29083304	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545858	2538740	2542231	275323	278704	SPCC794.08	SPAC19G12.14	efr3	its3	SPCC794.08	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Snider CE (2018)	29975157	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545859	2542883	2540248	279328	276780	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC336.03	alm1	efc25	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545860	2542883	2540727	279328	277250	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC1921.03c	alm1	mex67	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545861	2541942	2541274	278429	277788	SPAC222.09	SPBP8B7.20c	seb1	nop2	-	SPBP8B7.20c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemay JF (2016)	27401558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545862	2542883	2539175	279328	275746	SPAC1486.04c	SPCC16C4.01	alm1	sif2	-	SPCC5E4.09	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545863	2542883	2542187	279328	278662	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC57A7.09	alm1	SPAC57A7.09	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545864	2538740	2542231	275323	278704	SPCC794.08	SPAC19G12.14	efr3	its3	SPCC794.08	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Snider CE (2018)	29975157	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545865	2538740	2540856	275323	277373	SPCC794.08	SPBC4F6.12	efr3	pxl1	SPCC794.08	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Snider CE (2017)	28784611	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545866	2540559	2541073	277086	277588	SPBC26H8.04c	SPBC543.04	SPBC26H8.04c	SPBC543.04	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545867	2540954	2541818	277470	278309	SPBC337.13c	SPAC11G7.02	gtr1	pub1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545868	2542129	2541818	278605	278309	SPAC17G8.12	SPAC11G7.02	sec3	pub1	SPAC17G8.12	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kampmeyer C (2017)	28765280	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545869	2543082	2539296	279515	275864	SPAC3C7.08c	SPCC1235.03	elf1	cue2	-	SPCC1235.03	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Marayati BF (2018)	29844133	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545870	9407127	2539088	1028490	275660	SPBC29A10.17	SPCC777.05	SPBC29A10.17	gtr2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545871	2538768	2541818	275351	278309	SPCC330.05c	SPAC11G7.02	ura4	pub1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nishino K (2017)	28345447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545872	2540559	2541818	277086	278309	SPBC26H8.04c	SPAC11G7.02	SPBC26H8.04c	pub1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545873	2539958	2538913	276502	275490	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC31H12.08c	zfs1	ccr4	moc4	SPCC5E4.02c	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Webster MW (2019)	30601114	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545874	2539242	2541200	275812	277714	SPCC290.04	SPBC8D2.03c	ams2	hhf2	SPCC4F11.01	ams3|h4.2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Takayama Y (2007)	17452352	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545875	2541603	2543129	278100	279561	SPAC1F5.04c	SPAC4F8.13c	cdc12	rng2	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Willet AH (2018)	29343550	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545876	3361566	2539078	280642	275650	SPAC29B12.01	SPCC1259.04	ino80	iec3	SPAC3G6.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hogan CJ (2010)	19933844	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545877	2539242	2542463	275812	278924	SPCC290.04	SPAC1834.03c	ams2	hhf1	SPCC4F11.01	h4.1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Takayama Y (2007)	17452352	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545878	2541840	2541073	278331	277588	SPAC23H3.03c	SPBC543.04	npr2	SPBC543.04	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545879	2543360	2542655	279782	279109	SPAC664.10	SPAC3A11.14c	klp2	pkl1	-	SPAC3H5.03c|klp1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yukawa M (2018)	29167352	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545880	2541840	2539691	278331	276245	SPAC23H3.03c	SPBC12D12.03	npr2	cct1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545881	2543385	2542738	279807	279188	SPAC4G9.12	SPAC25B8.19c	SPAC4G9.12	loz1	-	SPAC25B8.19c|SPAC683.01c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Corkins ME (2017)	28667014	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545882	2542744	2542072	279194	278549	SPAC1565.08	SPAP32A8.03c	cdc48	bop1	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	SPAP32A8.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545883	2542744	2539012	279194	275585	SPAC1565.08	SPCC1020.01c	cdc48	pma2	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	SPCC1393.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545884	2541455	2541141	277958	277656	SPAC6G9.06c	SPBC649.05	pcp1	cut12	-	stf1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Fong CS (2010)	19942852	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545885	9406966	2540966	1028329	277482	SPCC16C4.22	SPBC3D6.09	SPCC16C4.22	dpb4	SPNCRNA.470|SPNG2185	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	He H (2017)	29109278	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545886	9406966	2540966	1028329	277482	SPCC16C4.22	SPBC3D6.09	SPCC16C4.22	dpb4	SPNCRNA.470|SPNG2185	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	He H (2017)	29109278	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545887	9406966	2540966	1028329	277482	SPCC16C4.22	SPBC3D6.09	SPCC16C4.22	dpb4	SPNCRNA.470|SPNG2185	-	Co-purification	physical	He H (2017)	29109278	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545888	9406966	2540966	1028329	277482	SPCC16C4.22	SPBC3D6.09	SPCC16C4.22	dpb4	SPNCRNA.470|SPNG2185	-	Co-fractionation	physical	He H (2017)	29109278	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545889	2540464	2543606	276992	280021	SPBC23E6.02	SPAC4C5.04	rrp2	rad31	SPBC23E6.02	uba4	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Wei Y (2017)	28552615	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545890	2540464	2540734	276992	277257	SPBC23E6.02	SPBC19G7.09	rrp2	ulp1	SPBC23E6.02	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Wei Y (2017)	28552615	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545891	2542744	2541251	279194	277765	SPAC1565.08	SPBC947.10	cdc48	dsc1	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545892	2541987	2540720	278471	277243	SPAP27G11.04c	SPBC216.07c	tad3	tor2	-	SPBC646.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Otsubo Y (2018)	29330317	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545893	9407219	2539418	1028582	275983	SPBC8E4.12c	SPCC757.07c	ecl3	ctt1	SPNG1995-96	cta1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Shimasaki T (2014)	24696293	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545894	2539542	2539380	276104	275946	SPCC4G3.18	SPCC18.05c	rix1	SPCC18.05c	SPCC4G3.18	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kawashima SA (2016)	27667686	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545895	2540389	2542222	276917	278695	SPBC31E1.03	SPAC31G5.18c	hub1	sde2	ubl4	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545896	2540389	2542222	276917	278695	SPBC31E1.03	SPAC31G5.18c	hub1	sde2	ubl4	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545897	2540389	2543189	276917	279618	SPBC31E1.03	SPAC30D11.09	hub1	cwf19	ubl4	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545898	2542670	2540720	279123	277243	SPAC26F1.13c	SPBC216.07c	lrs1	tor2	-	SPBC646.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Otsubo Y (2018)	29330317	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545899	2542222	2539683	278695	276238	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC146.05c	sde2	cwf25	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545900	2542937	2540720	279378	277243	SPAC10F6.03c	SPBC216.07c	cts1	tor2	-	SPBC646.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Otsubo Y (2018)	29330317	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545901	2540580	2540654	277106	277179	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC19F5.01c	ran1	puc1	pat1	SPBP8B7.32c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Caligiuri M (1997)	9201720	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545902	2539491	2539380	276054	275946	SPCC737.08	SPCC18.05c	SPCC737.08	SPCC18.05c	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Kawashima SA (2016)	27667686	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545903	2539088	2540720	275660	277243	SPCC777.05	SPBC216.07c	gtr2	tor2	-	SPBC646.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545904	2541073	2540720	277588	277243	SPBC543.04	SPBC216.07c	SPBC543.04	tor2	-	SPBC646.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545905	2539009	2539009	275582	275582	SPCC1739.04c	SPCC1739.04c	SPCC1739.04c	SPCC1739.04c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Blyth J (2018)	29259000	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545906	2542222	2543189	278695	279618	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC30D11.09	sde2	cwf19	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545907	2542883	2542429	279328	278891	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC1B3.07c	alm1	vps28	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545908	2542883	2542619	279328	279073	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC6G10.02c	alm1	tea3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545909	2542883	2539467	279328	276030	SPAC1486.04c	SPCC417.07c	alm1	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545910	2542883	2541973	279328	278458	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC6G9.13c	alm1	bqt1	-	mug23|rec26	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545911	2542883	2539908	279328	276454	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC13E7.06	alm1	msd1	-	mug172	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545912	2542883	2539122	279328	275694	SPAC1486.04c	SPCC14G10.03c	alm1	ump1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545913	2543441	2539123	279861	275695	SPAC821.12	SPCC18B5.03	orb6	wee1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Hou MC (2003)	12456722	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545914	2542222	2540932	278695	277448	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC36.09	sde2	sap61	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545915	2542222	2540622	278695	277148	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC21C3.05	sde2	sap62	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545916	2540431	2540720	276959	277243	SPBC19C7.06	SPBC216.07c	prs1	tor2	-	SPBC646.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Otsubo Y (2018)	29330317	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545917	2539187	2540720	275758	277243	SPCC16C4.14c	SPBC216.07c	sfc4	tor2	-	SPBC646.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Otsubo Y (2018)	29330317	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545918	2542883	2539123	279328	275695	SPAC1486.04c	SPCC18B5.03	alm1	wee1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545919	2538992	2540720	275566	277243	SPCC290.02	SPBC216.07c	rpc34	tor2	-	SPBC646.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Otsubo Y (2018)	29330317	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545920	2542884	2541251	279329	277765	SPAC1486.02c	SPBC947.10	dsc2	dsc1	ucp14	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Burr R (2017)	28202541	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545921	2542883	2540912	279328	277428	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC557.02c	alm1	SPBC557.02c	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545922	2539016	2539123	275589	275695	SPCC970.04c	SPCC18B5.03	mob2	wee1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Hou MC (2003)	12456722	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545923	2542883	2542681	279328	279134	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC27E2.01	alm1	SPAC27E2.01	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545924	2542883	2540097	279328	276635	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC11C11.03	alm1	ndc80	-	ndc10|tid3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545925	2541942	2539954	278429	276498	SPAC222.09	SPBC1709.15c	seb1	cft2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemay JF (2016)	27401558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545926	2541942	2539954	278429	276498	SPAC222.09	SPBC1709.15c	seb1	cft2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lemay JF (2016)	27401558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545927	2540954	2540720	277470	277243	SPBC337.13c	SPBC216.07c	gtr1	tor2	-	SPBC646.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545928	2541179	2539438	277693	276001	SPBC6B1.08c	SPCC4B3.07	ofd1	nro1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Clasen SJ (2017)	29083304	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545929	2540559	2540720	277086	277243	SPBC26H8.04c	SPBC216.07c	SPBC26H8.04c	tor2	-	SPBC646.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545930	2543351	2541322	279773	277834	SPAC8C9.03	SPBP4H10.09	cgs1	rsv1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Hao Z (1997)	9372444	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545931	2539869	2540654	276415	277179	SPBC11B10.09	SPBC19F5.01c	cdc2	puc1	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	SPBP8B7.32c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Forsburg SL (1994)	8006074	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545932	2543166	2543166	279597	279597	SPAC31G5.07	SPAC31G5.07	dni1	dni1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Curto M A (2018)	29134248	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545933	2541973	2541798	278458	278289	SPAC6G9.13c	SPAC22F3.03c	bqt1	rdh54	mug23|rec26	mug34|tid1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Moiseeva V (2017)	29123917	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545934	2540550	2540720	277077	277243	SPBC25H2.02	SPBC216.07c	trs1	tor2	ths1	SPBC646.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Otsubo Y (2018)	29330317	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545935	3361566	2540051	280642	276589	SPAC29B12.01	SPBC32H8.12c	ino80	act1	SPAC3G6.12	cps8|pi012	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hogan CJ (2010)	19933844	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545936	2541840	2541877	278331	278367	SPAC23H3.03c	SPAC11E3.05	npr2	sea3	-	SPAC11E3.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545937	2540046	2540720	276584	277243	SPBC1773.10c	SPBC216.07c	nrs1	tor2	ded81	SPBC646.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Otsubo Y (2018)	29330317	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545938	2541840	2540720	278331	277243	SPAC23H3.03c	SPBC216.07c	npr2	tor2	-	SPBC646.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545939	2539280	2540720	275848	277243	SPCC330.10	SPBC216.07c	pcm1	tor2	-	SPBC646.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Otsubo Y (2018)	29330317	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545940	2542744	2542497	279194	278956	SPAC1565.08	SPAC1A6.04c	cdc48	plb1	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545941	2540733	2543166	277256	279597	SPBC4.01	SPAC31G5.07	dni2	dni1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Curto M A (2018)	29134248	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545942	2542744	2540049	279194	276587	SPAC1565.08	SPBC106.03	cdc48	SPBC106.03	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545943	2542744	2541304	279194	277816	SPAC1565.08	SPBP4H10.07	cdc48	SPBP4H10.07	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545944	2542041	2539117	278522	275689	SPAC27E2.09	SPCC74.06	mak2	mak3	phk1	phk2	Co-purification	physical	Quinn J (2010)	20919928	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545945	2539207	2541322	275777	277834	SPCC285.09c	SPBP4H10.09	cgs2	rsv1	pde1	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Hao Z (1997)	9372444	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545946	2543492	2540841	279912	277358	SPAC890.07c	SPBC18H10.12c	rmt1	rpl701	prmt1	rpl7|rpl7-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Perreault A (2007)	17213188	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545947	2542194	2540601	278669	277127	SPAC17G6.17	SPBC29A3.14c	pof8	trt1	-	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Mennie AK (2018)	29422503	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545948	2542194	2540601	278669	277127	SPAC17G6.17	SPBC29A3.14c	pof8	trt1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Collopy LC (2018)	29422501	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545949	2540580	2541322	277106	277834	SPBC19C2.05	SPBP4H10.09	ran1	rsv1	pat1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Hao Z (1997)	9372444	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545950	2543492	2542869	279912	279314	SPAC890.07c	SPAC140.02	rmt1	gar2	prmt1	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Perreault A (2007)	17213188	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545951	2540464	2540618	276992	277144	SPBC23E6.02	SPBC3D6.11c	rrp2	slx8	SPBC23E6.02	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Wei Y (2017)	28552615	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545952	2542222	2539730	278695	276282	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC1861.08c	sde2	lea1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545953	2540464	2538706	276992	275290	SPBC23E6.02	SPCC338.08	rrp2	ctp1	SPBC23E6.02	mug38|nip1|slr9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Wei Y (2017)	28552615	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545954	2541071	2542032	277586	278514	SPBC582.05c	SPAC23C11.04c	brc1	pnk1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2017)	28922417	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545955	2540728	2541165	277251	277680	SPBC216.06c	SPBC776.12c	swi1	hsk1	-	cdc7	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Shimmoto M (2009)	19422421	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545956	2542542	2540618	278999	277144	SPAC19A8.10	SPBC3D6.11c	rfp1	slx8	mug140	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wei Y (2017)	28552615	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545957	2542222	2540353	278695	276882	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC2F12.12c	sde2	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Co-purification	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545958	2542222	2540353	278695	276882	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC2F12.12c	sde2	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545959	2542222	2540353	278695	276882	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC2F12.12c	sde2	cay1	-	SPBC2F12.12c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545960	2542222	2542690	278695	279143	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC27D7.07c	sde2	smd1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545961	2542222	2539055	278695	275628	SPAC31G5.18c	SPCC16A11.13	sde2	luc7	-	usp106	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545962	2542032	2538706	278514	275290	SPAC23C11.04c	SPCC338.08	pnk1	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2017)	28922417	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545963	2543382	2539219	279804	275789	SPAC890.02c	SPCC1795.01c	alp7	mad3	mia1	SPCC895.02	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sato M (2003)	12951601	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545964	2542883	2542067	279328	278544	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC23D3.01	alm1	pdp3	-	SPAC23D3.01	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545965	2542883	3361519	279328	280595	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC1002.01	alm1	SPAC1002.01	-	SPAC1610.05	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545966	2541942	2542869	278429	279314	SPAC222.09	SPAC140.02	seb1	gar2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemay JF (2016)	27401558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545967	2542883	2542252	279328	278722	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC17A2.13c	alm1	rad25	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545968	2542883	2538736	279328	275320	SPAC1486.04c	SPCC1322.12c	alm1	bub1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545969	2542883	2539585	279328	276144	SPAC1486.04c	SPCC794.10	alm1	SPCC794.10	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545971	2542883	2542304	279328	278771	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC1687.20c	alm1	mis6	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545972	2542883	2542860	279328	279306	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC8C9.09c	alm1	mug129	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545973	2542883	2542244	279328	278714	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC19G12.13c	alm1	poz1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545974	2541942	2541668	278429	278164	SPAC222.09	SPAC1F7.02c	seb1	has1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemay JF (2016)	27401558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545975	2542204	2543630	278679	280044	SPAC17A5.14	SPAC1F3.01	exo2	rrp6	-	SPAC3H8.11	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Atkinson SR (2018)	29914874	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545976	2540369	2542304	276898	278771	SPBC27B12.02	SPAC1687.20c	mis19	mis6	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Hirai H (2014)	25375240	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545977	2543192	2540618	279621	277144	SPAC343.18	SPBC3D6.11c	rfp2	slx8	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wei Y (2017)	28552615	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545978	2540954	9407127	277470	1028490	SPBC337.13c	SPBC29A10.17	gtr1	SPBC29A10.17	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545979	2540962	2540290	277478	276821	SPBC36.12c	SPBC29A3.02c	git7	his7	SPBC713.01c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Schadick K (2002)	12456004	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545980	2543058	2543560	279492	279976	SPAC3G6.02	SPAC664.03	rpn15	paf1	dss1|sem1	SPAC664.03	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Schenstrom SM (2018)	30355493	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545981	3361323	2541165	280399	277680	SPBC30D10.04	SPBC776.12c	swi3	hsk1	-	cdc7	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Shimmoto M (2009)	19422421	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545982	2541479	2541220	277981	277734	SPAC27F1.06c	SPBC8D2.04	SPAC27F1.06c	hht2	-	h3.2	Protein-peptide	physical	Tan HL (2018)	29194511	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545983	2538736	2539219	275320	275789	SPCC1322.12c	SPCC1795.01c	bub1	mad3	-	SPCC895.02	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Mora-Santos MD (2016)	27618268	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545984	2539812	2541220	276362	277734	SPBC1347.02	SPBC8D2.04	fkbp39	hht2	-	h3.2	Protein-peptide	physical	Tan HL (2018)	29194511	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545985	2542427	2539722	278889	276275	SPAC6F6.12	SPBC14F5.11c	SPAC6F6.12	mug186	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhao D (2016)	27737912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545986	2542427	2539722	278889	276275	SPAC6F6.12	SPBC14F5.11c	SPAC6F6.12	mug186	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhao D (2016)	27737912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545987	2542744	2542255	279194	278725	SPAC1565.08	SPAC57A7.08	cdc48	pzh1	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	phz1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545988	2540730	2540730	277253	277253	SPBC19C2.09	SPBC19C2.09	sre1	sre1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Gong X (2016)	27811944	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545989	2539242	2539991	275812	276535	SPCC290.04	SPBC1105.12	ams2	hhf3	SPCC4F11.01	h4.3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Takayama Y (2007)	17452352	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545990	2539242	2541220	275812	277734	SPCC290.04	SPBC8D2.04	ams2	hht2	SPCC4F11.01	h3.2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Takayama Y (2007)	17452352	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545991	2542674	2543630	279127	280044	SPAC26A3.12c	SPAC1F3.01	dhp1	rrp6	rat1	SPAC3H8.11	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Shah S (2014)	24493644	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545992	3361566	2543227	280642	279655	SPAC29B12.01	SPAPB8E5.09	ino80	rvb1	SPAC3G6.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hogan CJ (2010)	19933844	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545993	2541018	2538736	277533	275320	SPBC3B9.11c	SPCC1322.12c	ctf1	bub1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sonkar A (2017)	28567704	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545994	2542194	2543630	278669	280044	SPAC17G6.17	SPAC1F3.01	pof8	rrp6	-	SPAC3H8.11	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Collopy LC (2018)	29422501	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545995	2542744	2539260	279194	275830	SPAC1565.08	SPCC285.11	cdc48	dsc5	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	ucp10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545996	2540234	2543227	276766	279655	SPBC336.12c	SPAPB8E5.09	cdc10	rvb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Knezevic I (2018)	30134042	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545997	2542744	2542720	279194	279171	SPAC1565.08	SPAC25G10.05c	cdc48	his1	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545998	2542744	2538751	279194	275334	SPAC1565.08	SPCC1442.07c	cdc48	SPCC1442.07c	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2545999	2542744	2541672	279194	278168	SPAC1565.08	SPAC2F3.15	cdc48	lsk1	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546000	2540473	2543630	277001	280044	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC1F3.01	tor1	rrp6	-	SPAC3H8.11	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Cohen A (2018)	29632066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546001	2540473	2543560	277001	279976	SPBC30D10.10c	SPAC664.03	tor1	paf1	-	SPAC664.03	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Cohen A (2018)	29632066	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546002	2542744	2542875	279194	279320	SPAC1565.08	SPAC13G7.02c	cdc48	ssa1	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546003	2542744	2542884	279194	279329	SPAC1565.08	SPAC1486.02c	cdc48	dsc2	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	ucp14	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546004	2542744	2540304	279194	276834	SPAC1565.08	SPBC354.13	cdc48	rga6	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546005	2542744	2540947	279194	277463	SPAC1565.08	SPBC354.07c	cdc48	SPBC354.07c	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546006	2538930	2543630	275506	280044	SPCC188.13c	SPAC1F3.01	dcr1	rrp6	SPCC584.10c	SPAC3H8.11	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Atkinson SR (2018)	29914874	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546007	2538930	2543630	275506	280044	SPCC188.13c	SPAC1F3.01	dcr1	rrp6	SPCC584.10c	SPAC3H8.11	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Atkinson SR (2018)	29914874	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546008	2542744	2541990	279194	278474	SPAC1565.08	SPAC20H4.02	cdc48	dsc3	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546009	2540389	2539984	276917	276528	SPBC31E1.03	SPBC1289.11	hub1	spf38	ubl4	cwf17	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546010	2543129	2541738	279561	278232	SPAC4F8.13c	SPAC20G4.06c	rng2	adf1	-	cof1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Takaine M (2009)	19713940	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546011	2539317	2542427	275883	278889	SPCC16A11.08	SPAC6F6.12	atg20	SPAC6F6.12	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhao D (2016)	27737912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546012	2539317	2542427	275883	278889	SPCC16A11.08	SPAC6F6.12	atg20	SPAC6F6.12	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhao D (2016)	27737912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546013	2539317	2542427	275883	278889	SPCC16A11.08	SPAC6F6.12	atg20	SPAC6F6.12	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Zhao D (2016)	27737912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546014	2542414	2542244	278878	278714	SPAC6F6.16c	SPAC19G12.13c	tpz1	poz1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Kim JK (2017)	29149597	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546015	2539088	9407127	275660	1028490	SPCC777.05	SPBC29A10.17	gtr2	SPBC29A10.17	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546016	2542222	2542874	278695	279319	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC20H4.09	sde2	SPAC20H4.09	-	SPAC145.03	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546017	2542222	2539617	278695	276175	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC1861.04c	sde2	prp24	-	SPBC1861.04c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546018	2542222	2539607	278695	276165	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC11G11.06c	sde2	sme1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546019	2542222	2541998	278695	278482	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC23A1.09	sde2	SPAC23A1.09	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546020	2539722	2542427	276275	278889	SPBC14F5.11c	SPAC6F6.12	mug186	SPAC6F6.12	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhao D (2016)	27737912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546021	2539722	2542427	276275	278889	SPBC14F5.11c	SPAC6F6.12	mug186	SPAC6F6.12	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhao D (2016)	27737912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546022	2542884	2543396	279329	279818	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC4D7.11	dsc2	dsc4	ucp14	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Burr R (2017)	28202541	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546023	2542884	2539260	279329	275830	SPAC1486.02c	SPCC285.11	dsc2	dsc5	ucp14	ucp10	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Burr R (2017)	28202541	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546024	2540115	2542244	276652	278714	SPBC1778.02	SPAC19G12.13c	rap1	poz1	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Kim JK (2017)	29149597	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546025	2540115	2542244	276652	278714	SPBC1778.02	SPAC19G12.13c	rap1	poz1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kim JK (2017)	29149597	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546026	2542222	2540941	278695	277457	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC365.05c	sde2	slu7	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546027	2541065	2540730	277580	277253	SPBC3B9.15c	SPBC19C2.09	scp1	sre1	scap	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Burr R (2017)	28202541	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546028	2542222	2539984	278695	276528	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC1289.11	sde2	spf38	-	cwf17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546029	2542222	2540707	278695	277230	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC19C2.01	sde2	cdc28	-	prp8|SPBC21B10.01c|SPBC874.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546030	2542222	2541219	278695	277733	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC8D2.09c	sde2	msl1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546031	2542222	2540462	278695	276990	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC29A3.07c	sde2	sap14	-	sab14|SF3b14a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546032	2539352	2539352	275918	275918	SPCC188.07	SPCC188.07	ccq1	ccq1	-	-	Co-purification	physical	Armstrong CA (2018)	29216371	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546033	2539352	2539352	275918	275918	SPCC188.07	SPCC188.07	ccq1	ccq1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Armstrong CA (2018)	29216371	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546034	2542884	2541990	279329	278474	SPAC1486.02c	SPAC20H4.02	dsc2	dsc3	ucp14	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Burr R (2017)	28202541	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546035	2542883	2539374	279328	275940	SPAC1486.04c	SPCC1259.07	alm1	rxt3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546036	2542883	2541545	279328	278045	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC22F8.07c	alm1	rtf1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546037	2542883	2543491	279328	279911	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC683.02c	alm1	SPAC683.02c	-	SPAC694.01c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546038	2542883	2541209	279328	277723	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC887.10	alm1	mcs4	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546039	2542883	2541058	279328	277573	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC3H7.09	alm1	erf2	-	mug142	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546040	2542883	2543681	279328	280095	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC9.02c	alm1	SPAC9.02c	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546041	2541942	2542121	278429	278597	SPAC222.09	SPAC17H9.05	seb1	ebp2	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemay JF (2016)	27401558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546042	2542883	2541672	279328	278168	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC2F3.15	alm1	lsk1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546043	2542883	2542255	279328	278725	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC57A7.08	alm1	pzh1	-	phz1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546044	2542883	2539920	279328	276464	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC119.08	alm1	pmk1	-	spm1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546045	2542129	2542875	278605	279320	SPAC17G8.12	SPAC13G7.02c	sec3	ssa1	SPAC17G8.12	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kampmeyer C (2017)	28765280	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546046	2538768	2542563	275351	279019	SPCC330.05c	SPAC1952.11c	ura4	ure2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nishino K (2017)	28345447	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546047	2542123	2543031	278599	279467	SPAC18G6.15	SPAC6F12.02	mal3	rst2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Takenaka K (2018)	29316864	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546048	2540810	2541720	277329	278214	SPBC19C7.03	SPAC23H3.13c	cyr1	gpa2	git2	git8	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Ivey FD (2005)	15831585	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546049	2540810	2541720	277329	278214	SPBC19C7.03	SPAC23H3.13c	cyr1	gpa2	git2	git8	Two-hybrid	physical	Ivey FD (2005)	15831585	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546050	2543351	2543031	279773	279467	SPAC8C9.03	SPAC6F12.02	cgs1	rst2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Higuchi T (2002)	11739717	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546052	2540020	2540255	276564	276786	SPBC16D10.09	SPBC336.04	pcn1	cdc6	pcn	mis10|pol3|pold	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Daigaku Y (2017)	28481910	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546053	3361566	2542854	280642	279300	SPAC29B12.01	SPAC144.02	ino80	iec1	SPAC3G6.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hogan CJ (2010)	19933844	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546054	3361566	2542854	280642	279300	SPAC29B12.01	SPAC144.02	ino80	iec1	SPAC3G6.12	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hogan CJ (2010)	19933844	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546055	2542744	2543066	279194	279499	SPAC1565.08	SPAC343.12	cdc48	rds1	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546056	2542655	2542732	279109	279182	SPAC3A11.14c	SPAC25G10.07c	pkl1	cut7	SPAC3H5.03c|klp1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yukawa M (2018)	29167352	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546057	3361384	2539403	280460	275968	SPAC12G12.13c	SPCC736.11	cid14	ago1	-	csp9	Co-purification	physical	Pisacane P (2017)	28541282	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546058	2543360	2542732	279782	279182	SPAC664.10	SPAC25G10.07c	klp2	cut7	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Yukawa M (2018)	29167352	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546059	2539781	2543031	276331	279467	SPBC106.10	SPAC6F12.02	pka1	rst2	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Takenaka K (2018)	29316864	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546060	2543129	2541603	279561	278100	SPAC4F8.13c	SPAC1F5.04c	rng2	cdc12	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Eng K (1998)	9635188	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546061	2540347	2539403	276876	275968	SPBC30B4.08	SPCC736.11	eri1	ago1	-	csp9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Iida T (2006)	16797182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546062	2542069	2539676	278546	276231	SPAC27D7.13c	SPBC1347.12	ssm4	arp1	SPAC637.01c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Fujita I (2015)	25736293	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546063	2542883	2539670	279328	276225	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC13G1.12	alm1	did2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546064	2542883	2538710	279328	275294	SPAC1486.04c	SPCC1020.12c	alm1	xap5	-	SPCC14G10.06	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546065	2542883	2543423	279328	279844	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC4H3.07c	alm1	SPAC4H3.07c	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546066	2542883	2543277	279328	279705	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC1002.03c	alm1	gls2	-	gls2alpha	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546067	2542883	2540276	279328	276807	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC2A9.03	alm1	SPBC2A9.03	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546068	2542883	2540134	279328	276671	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC17A3.03c	alm1	SPBC17A3.03c	-	pi043	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546069	2542883	2539108	279328	275680	SPAC1486.04c	SPCC1223.02	alm1	nmt1	-	thi3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546070	2541942	2543500	278429	279918	SPAC222.09	SPAC926.08c	seb1	SPAC926.08c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemay JF (2016)	27401558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546071	2541942	2542674	278429	279127	SPAC222.09	SPAC26A3.12c	seb1	dhp1	-	rat1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemay JF (2016)	27401558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546072	2542883	2543354	279328	279776	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC521.05	alm1	rps802	-	rps8-2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546073	2541942	2541446	278429	277951	SPAC222.09	SPAC23G3.01	seb1	rpb2	-	SPAC521.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemay JF (2016)	27401558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546074	2542129	2540939	278605	277455	SPAC17G8.12	SPBC4.07c	sec3	rpt2	SPAC17G8.12	mts2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kampmeyer C (2017)	28765280	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546075	2541652	2539295	278148	275863	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC417.08	sty1	tef3	phh1|spc1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Asp E (2008)	18065650	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546076	2539088	14218092	275660	4254454	SPCC777.05	SPAC222.19	gtr2	tam1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546077	2538740	2540883	275323	277400	SPCC794.08	SPBC577.06c	efr3	stt4	SPCC794.08	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Snider CE (2017)	28784611	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546078	2540559	2541840	277086	278331	SPBC26H8.04c	SPAC23H3.03c	SPBC26H8.04c	npr2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546079	2539438	2542012	276001	278495	SPCC4B3.07	SPAC23C11.02c	nro1	rps23	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Clasen SJ (2017)	29083304	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546080	2540778	2542674	277297	279127	SPBC19G7.10c	SPAC26A3.12c	SPBC19G7.10c	dhp1	-	rat1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Wang CY (2017)	28031482	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546081	2540778	2542674	277297	279127	SPBC19G7.10c	SPAC26A3.12c	SPBC19G7.10c	dhp1	-	rat1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Wang CY (2017)	28031482	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546082	2542222	2541843	278695	278334	SPAC31G5.18c	SPAC23H3.02c	sde2	ini1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546083	2542032	2543670	278514	280084	SPAC23C11.04c	SPAPB1E7.06c	pnk1	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Sanchez A (2017)	28922417	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546084	3361358	2543556	280434	279973	SPBC3F6.03	SPAC4F10.20	trr1	grx1	caf4	TTase1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Boronat S (2017)	28640807	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546085	2542883	2540929	279328	277445	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC354.03	alm1	swd3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546086	2542883	2540437	279328	276965	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC25B2.07c	alm1	mmb1	-	mug164	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546087	2542883	2541178	279328	277692	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC725.02	alm1	mpr1	-	spy1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546088	2542883	2542300	279328	278767	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC1687.22c	alm1	puf3	-	SPAC222.02c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546089	2542883	2539839	279328	276388	SPAC1486.04c	SPBC1734.13	alm1	atp3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546090	2540954	14218092	277470	4254454	SPBC337.13c	SPAC222.19	gtr1	tam1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546091	2541652	2539027	278148	275600	SPAC24B11.06c	SPCC1322.08	sty1	srk1	phh1|spc1	mkp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Asp E (2008)	18065650	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546092	2541179	2542012	277693	278495	SPBC6B1.08c	SPAC23C11.02c	ofd1	rps23	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Clasen SJ (2017)	29083304	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546093	2542744	2542541	279194	278998	SPAC1565.08	SPAC1B3.03c	cdc48	wis2	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	cyp5	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546094	2540234	3361566	276766	280642	SPBC336.12c	SPAC29B12.01	cdc10	ino80	-	SPAC3G6.12	Co-purification	physical	Knezevic I (2018)	30134042	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546095	2541179	2542012	277693	278495	SPBC6B1.08c	SPAC23C11.02c	ofd1	rps23	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Clasen SJ (2017)	29083304	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546096	2539047	2539911	275620	276456	SPCC1223.06	SPBC15D4.10c	tea1	amo1	alp8	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Pardo M (2005)	15797925	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546097	2542744	2541748	279194	278242	SPAC1565.08	SPAC22E12.06c	cdc48	gmh3	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546098	2542744	2542613	279194	279067	SPAC1565.08	SPAC18B11.03c	cdc48	SPAC18B11.03c	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Burr R (2017)	28821619	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546099	2538994	2543685	275568	280099	SPCC553.01c	SPAC3C7.03c	dbl2	rad55	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	rhp55	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Polakova S (2016)	27304859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546100	2540389	2540801	276917	277320	SPBC31E1.03	SPBC18H10.10c	hub1	saf4	ubl4	cwc16|cwf16	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546101	2540389	2538787	276917	275368	SPBC31E1.03	SPCC364.02c	hub1	bis1	ubl4	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546102	2539481	2542170	276044	278645	SPCC622.16c	SPAC17G8.13c	epe1	mst2	kdm2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Barrales RR (2016)	26744419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546103	2539317	2539824	275883	276374	SPCC16A11.08	SPBC1711.11	atg20	SPBC1711.11	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Zhao D (2016)	27737912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546104	2539317	2539824	275883	276374	SPCC16A11.08	SPBC1711.11	atg20	SPBC1711.11	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhao D (2016)	27737912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546105	2539317	2539824	275883	276374	SPCC16A11.08	SPBC1711.11	atg20	SPBC1711.11	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Zhao D (2016)	27737912	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546106	2541073	2541840	277588	278331	SPBC543.04	SPAC23H3.03c	SPBC543.04	npr2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chia KH (2017)	29199950	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546107	2538736	2539499	275320	276062	SPCC1322.12c	SPCC622.08c	bub1	hta1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kawashima SA (2010)	19965387	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546108	2542854	2543226	279300	279654	SPAC144.02	SPAC6B12.05c	iec1	ies2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Hogan CJ (2010)	19933844	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546109	2539078	3361566	275650	280642	SPCC1259.04	SPAC29B12.01	iec3	ino80	-	SPAC3G6.12	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hogan CJ (2010)	19933844	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546110	3361566	2543226	280642	279654	SPAC29B12.01	SPAC6B12.05c	ino80	ies2	SPAC3G6.12	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Hogan CJ (2010)	19933844	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546111	2542222	2540117	278695	276654	SPAC31G5.18c	SPBC1289.12	sde2	usp109	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546112	2542032	2540887	278514	277404	SPAC23C11.04c	SPBC4F6.15c	pnk1	swi10	-	rad23	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sanchez A (2017)	28922417	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546113	2541163	2540659	277678	277184	SPBC83.15	SPBC19F5.05c	SPBC83.15	ppp1	-	SPBC25D12.01c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kawashima SA (2016)	27667686	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546114	2542883	5802726	279328	857864	SPAC1486.04c	SPCC1223.15c	alm1	spc19	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546115	2542883	2539549	279328	276110	SPAC1486.04c	SPCC576.01c	alm1	xan1	-	SPCC576.01c|SPCPB1C11.04c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546116	2541942	2541600	278429	278097	SPAC222.09	SPAC6F12.17	seb1	rna14	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemay JF (2016)	27401558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546117	2541942	2542258	278429	278727	SPAC222.09	SPAC17G6.16c	seb1	ysh1	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemay JF (2016)	27401558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546118	2541942	2540659	278429	277184	SPAC222.09	SPBC19F5.05c	seb1	ppp1	-	SPBC25D12.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemay JF (2016)	27401558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546119	2541942	2543538	278429	279955	SPAC222.09	SPAC1071.01c	seb1	pta1	-	SPAC4H3.15c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lemay JF (2016)	27401558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546120	2542635	2539487	279089	276050	SPAC24H6.09	SPCC895.05	gef1	for3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Wei B (2016)	26941334	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546121	2542883	2541803	279328	278294	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC22E12.04	alm1	ccs1	-	pccs	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546122	2542883	2538778	279328	275359	SPAC1486.04c	SPCC4G3.15c	alm1	not2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546123	2542883	2543677	279328	280091	SPAC1486.04c	SPAPB1E7.05	alm1	gde1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546124	2542883	2541467	279328	277969	SPAC1486.04c	SPAC22G7.02	alm1	kap111	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546125	2542883	2539555	279328	276116	SPAC1486.04c	SPCC4B3.08	alm1	lsg1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Salas-Pino S (2017)	28974540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546126	2541942	2542258	278429	278727	SPAC222.09	SPAC17G6.16c	seb1	ysh1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lemay JF (2016)	27401558	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546127	2543492	2539020	279912	275593	SPAC890.07c	SPCC5E4.06	rmt1	smc6	prmt1	rad18	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Perreault A (2007)	17213188	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546128	2543580	2540584	279995	277110	SPAC644.14c	SPBC28F2.07	rad51	sfr1	rhp51	dds20|mug13	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Lu CH (2018)	30297419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546129	2539576	2543200	276136	279629	SPCC794.01c	SPAC3A12.18	zwf2	zwf1	SPCC794.01c	SPAC9.01	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Corkins ME (2017)	28667014	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546130	2540574	2540584	277101	277110	SPBC409.03	SPBC28F2.07	swi5	sfr1	-	dds20|mug13	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Lu CH (2018)	30297419	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546131	2538994	2540584	275568	277110	SPCC553.01c	SPBC28F2.07	dbl2	sfr1	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	dds20|mug13	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Polakova S (2016)	27304859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546132	2538913	2538778	275490	275359	SPCC31H12.08c	SPCC4G3.15c	ccr4	not2	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Webster MW (2018)	29932902	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546133	2541587	2539020	278084	275593	SPAC14C4.02c	SPCC5E4.06	smc5	smc6	spr18	rad18	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Alt A (2017)	28134253	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546134	2542222	2538832	278695	275413	SPAC31G5.18c	SPCC962.06c	sde2	bpb1	-	sf1|ods3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546135	2542222	2538964	278695	275538	SPAC31G5.18c	SPCC285.12	sde2	lsm7	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Thakran P (2018)	28947618	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546136	2542732	2539864	279182	276411	SPAC25G10.07c	SPBC16A3.15c	cut7	nda2	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	von Loeffelholz O (2019)	30659798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546137	2542300	2538778	278767	275359	SPAC1687.22c	SPCC4G3.15c	puf3	not2	SPAC222.02c	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Webster MW (2019)	30601114	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546138	2539958	2538778	276502	275359	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC4G3.15c	zfs1	not2	moc4	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Webster MW (2019)	30601114	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546139	2541018	2541600	277533	278097	SPBC3B9.11c	SPAC6F12.17	ctf1	rna14	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sonkar A (2017)	28567704	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2546140	2541600	2541018	278097	277533	SPAC6F12.17	SPBC3B9.11c	rna14	ctf1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sonkar A (2017)	28567704	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	POMBASE
2550130	2540060	2539219	276598	275789	SPBC106.01	SPCC1795.01c	mph1	mad3	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	SPCC895.02	Biochemical Activity	physical	Zich J (2016)	26882497	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2550131	2543222	2540589	279650	277115	SPAC821.08c	SPBC20F10.06	slp1	mad2	cdc20	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zich J (2016)	26882497	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2550132	2543222	2539219	279650	275789	SPAC821.08c	SPCC1795.01c	slp1	mad3	cdc20	SPCC895.02	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zich J (2016)	26882497	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2550133	2542615	2540589	279069	277115	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBC20F10.06	cut20	mad2	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zich J (2016)	26882497	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2550134	2542615	2539219	279069	275789	SPAC19G12.01c	SPCC1795.01c	cut20	mad3	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	SPCC895.02	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zich J (2016)	26882497	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2550135	2543222	2539641	279650	276196	SPAC821.08c	SPBC14C8.01c	slp1	cut2	cdc20	SPBC1815.02c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Zich J (2016)	26882497	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	as part of the APC	-	BIOGRID
2550234	14218023	2539309	4254385	275876	SPAC9G1.15c	SPCC4G3.19	mzt1	alp16	tam4	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Masuda H (2016)	27053664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
2550235	2540392	2539309	276920	275876	SPBC365.15	SPCC4G3.19	alp4	alp16	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Masuda H (2016)	27053664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
2550236	2539309	2540667	275876	277192	SPCC4G3.19	SPBC211.06	alp16	gfh1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Masuda H (2016)	27053664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
2550237	2539309	2543117	275876	279549	SPCC4G3.19	SPAC806.08c	alp16	mod21	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Masuda H (2016)	27053664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
2550238	2540667	2543117	277192	279549	SPBC211.06	SPAC806.08c	gfh1	mod21	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Masuda H (2016)	27053664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
2550239	2539309	2540589	275876	277115	SPCC4G3.19	SPBC20F10.06	alp16	mad2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Masuda H (2016)	27053664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	-	-	BIOGRID
2550502	2542239	2542467	278711	278928	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC1834.04	chp1	hht1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Zocco M (2016)	27462451	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2550503	2541741	2538846	278235	275427	SPAC20G4.02c	SPCC1919.10c	fus1	myo52	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Dudin O (2016)	27798845	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2550504	2541741	2540405	278235	276933	SPAC20G4.02c	SPBC25B2.02c	fus1	mam1	-	SPBC2G5.09c	Co-localization	physical	Dudin O (2016)	27798845	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2550505	2541741	2542271	278235	278740	SPAC20G4.02c	SPAC3F10.10c	fus1	map3	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Dudin O (2016)	27798845	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2550506	2541741	2540414	278235	276942	SPAC20G4.02c	SPBC24C6.06	fus1	gpa1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Dudin O (2016)	27798845	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2550507	2542271	2538846	278740	275427	SPAC3F10.10c	SPCC1919.10c	map3	myo52	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Dudin O (2016)	27798845	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell fusion	forced binding leads to aberrant fusion	-	BIOGRID
2550508	2542271	2541741	278740	278235	SPAC3F10.10c	SPAC20G4.02c	map3	fus1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Dudin O (2016)	27798845	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell fusion|cell fusion:partial rescue	deletion of fus1 inhibits the aberrant fusion seen by mutants of map3 and myo52 that induce forced binding	-	BIOGRID
2550509	2538846	2541741	275427	278235	SPCC1919.10c	SPAC20G4.02c	myo52	fus1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Dudin O (2016)	27798845	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell fusion	deletion of fus1 inhibits the aberrant fusion seen by mutants of map3 and myo52 that induce forced binding	-	BIOGRID
2550510	2542271	2542137	278740	278613	SPAC3F10.10c	SPAC1D4.13	map3	byr1	-	ste1|ste3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Dudin O (2016)	27798845	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell fusion	expression of a mutant Byr1 in map3 or rgs1 mutant background induces improperly time fusion	-	BIOGRID
2550511	2541764	2542137	278258	278613	SPAC22F3.12c	SPAC1D4.13	rgs1	byr1	-	ste1|ste3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Dudin O (2016)	27798845	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell fusion	expression of a mutant Byr1 in map3 or rgs1 mutant background induces improperly time fusion	-	BIOGRID
2550512	2541764	2541741	278258	278235	SPAC22F3.12c	SPAC20G4.02c	rgs1	fus1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Dudin O (2016)	27798845	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell fusion:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2550513	2541899	2540825	278389	277343	SPAC22E12.11c	SPBC428.08c	set3	clr4	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yu Y (2016)	27538348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:partial rescue|silencing:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2550514	2541899	2539050	278389	275623	SPAC22E12.11c	SPCC11E10.08	set3	rik1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yu Y (2016)	27538348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:partial rescue|silencing:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2550515	2541899	2538930	278389	275506	SPAC22E12.11c	SPCC188.13c	set3	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Yu Y (2016)	27538348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:partial rescue|silencing:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2550516	2541949	2542363	278436	278827	SPAC222.04c	SPAC1783.05	ies6	hrp1	-	chd1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Choi ES (2017)	28904333	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2550517	2543226	2542363	279654	278827	SPAC6B12.05c	SPAC1783.05	ies2	hrp1	-	chd1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Choi ES (2017)	28904333	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	-	-	BIOGRID
2550518	3361566	2542363	280642	278827	SPAC29B12.01	SPAC1783.05	ino80	hrp1	SPAC3G6.12	chd1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Choi ES (2017)	28904333	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing|viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2550519	2541949	2539658	278436	276213	SPAC222.04c	SPBC1105.17	ies6	cnp1	-	sim2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Choi ES (2017)	28904333	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2550521	2908	2541645	109165	278141	-	SPAC1527.03	NR3C1	SPAC1527.03	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550522	2908	2542246	109165	278716	-	SPAC17H9.12c	NR3C1	SPAC17H9.12c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550523	2908	2542273	109165	278742	-	SPAC17H9.13c	NR3C1	SPAC17H9.13c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550524	2908	2541874	109165	278364	-	SPAC1F8.07c	NR3C1	SPAC1F8.07c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550525	2908	2541508	109165	278010	-	SPAC24H6.01c	NR3C1	SPAC24H6.01c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAPB21F2.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550526	2908	3361412	109165	280488	-	SPAC25G10.01	NR3C1	SPAC25G10.01	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAC2C4.18	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550527	2908	2542090	109165	278567	-	SPAC25G10.08	NR3C1	SPAC25G10.08	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	p116	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550528	2908	2541615	109165	278112	-	SPAC27D7.11c	NR3C1	SPAC27D7.11c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550529	2908	2543203	109165	279632	-	SPAC323.04	NR3C1	SPAC323.04	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550530	2908	2543080	109165	279513	-	SPAC3A11.10c	NR3C1	SPAC3A11.10c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550531	2908	2543631	109165	280045	-	SPAC458.02c	NR3C1	SPAC458.02c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550532	2908	2543333	109165	279756	-	SPAC694.02	NR3C1	SPAC694.02	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550533	2908	2539932	109165	276476	-	SPBC13E7.07	NR3C1	SPBC13E7.07	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550534	2908	2539747	109165	276299	-	SPBC15D4.09c	NR3C1	SPBC15D4.09c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550535	2908	2540078	109165	276616	-	SPBC16H5.08c	NR3C1	SPBC16H5.08c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550536	2908	2540086	109165	276624	-	SPBC16H5.12c	NR3C1	SPBC16H5.12c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPNCRNA.537|SPNGAF91	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550537	2908	2539652	109165	276207	-	SPBC1703.13c	NR3C1	SPBC1703.13c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550538	2908	2540631	109165	277157	-	SPBC25B2.10	NR3C1	SPBC25B2.10	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550539	2908	2540376	109165	276905	-	SPBC26H8.11c	NR3C1	SPBC26H8.11c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550540	2908	2540441	109165	276969	-	SPBC2G5.05	NR3C1	SPBC2G5.05	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550541	2908	2541146	109165	277661	-	SPBC660.16	NR3C1	SPBC660.16	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550542	2908	2541218	109165	277732	-	SPBC8D2.18c	NR3C1	SPBC8D2.18c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550543	2908	2538924	109165	275501	-	SPCC1620.06c	NR3C1	SPCC1620.06c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550544	2908	2539299	109165	275867	-	SPCC1672.07	NR3C1	SPCC1672.07	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550545	2908	2539389	109165	275954	-	SPCC1827.05c	NR3C1	SPCC1827.05c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550546	2908	2538811	109165	275392	-	SPCC330.03c	NR3C1	SPCC330.03c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550547	2908	2538821	109165	275402	-	SPCC584.01c	NR3C1	SPCC584.01c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550548	2908	2539181	109165	275752	-	SPCC622.14	NR3C1	SPCC622.14	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550549	2908	2539509	109165	276071	-	SPCC825.01	NR3C1	SPCC825.01	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550550	2908	2538973	109165	275547	-	SPCPB16A4.02c	NR3C1	SPCPB16A4.02c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550551	2908	2541450	109165	277955	-	SPAC24C9.06c	NR3C1	SPAC24C9.06c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550552	2908	2541348	109165	277859	-	SPBP4H10.15	NR3C1	SPBP4H10.15	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550553	2908	2540051	109165	276589	-	SPBC32H8.12c	NR3C1	act1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	cps8|pi012	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550554	2908	2538902	109165	275480	-	SPCC13B11.01	NR3C1	adh1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	adh	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550555	2908	2542714	109165	279167	-	SPAC5H10.06c	NR3C1	adh4	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550556	2908	2539007	109165	275580	-	SPCC1281.01	NR3C1	ags1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPCC17A7.01|SPCC338.01c|mok1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550557	2908	2542031	109165	278513	-	SPAC23C11.09	NR3C1	ala1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	ars1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550558	2908	2540900	109165	277416	-	SPBC530.10c	NR3C1	anc1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550559	2908	2540899	109165	277415	-	SPBC4F6.18c	NR3C1	arf1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550560	2908	2540729	109165	277252	-	SPBC215.08c	NR3C1	arg4	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550561	2908	2543087	109165	279520	-	SPAC30C2.04	NR3C1	SPAC30C2.04	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550562	2908	2541386	109165	277897	-	SPBP8B7.24c	NR3C1	atg8	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550563	2908	2541526	109165	278026	-	SPAC14C4.14	NR3C1	atp1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550564	2908	2541927	109165	278415	-	SPAC222.12c	NR3C1	atp2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550565	2908	2539241	109165	275811	-	SPCC1840.06	NR3C1	atp5	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550566	2908	2540446	109165	276974	-	SPBC29A10.13	NR3C1	atp7	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550567	2908	2539843	109165	276391	-	SPBC16G5.11c	NR3C1	bag101	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	bag1|bag1-a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550568	2908	2540564	109165	277091	-	SPBC530.03c	NR3C1	bag102	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	bag1-b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550569	2908	2542019	109165	278502	-	SPAC23A1.17	NR3C1	SPAC23A1.17	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550570	2908	2538822	109165	275403	-	SPCC1840.02c	NR3C1	bgs4	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	cwg1|orb11|pbr1|sph1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550571	2908	2541815	109165	278306	-	SPAC22A12.15c	NR3C1	bip1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	bip	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550572	2908	2543515	109165	279933	-	SPAC4F10.14c	NR3C1	btf3	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	btt1|egd1|nac2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550573	2908	2540960	109165	277476	-	SPBC3D6.02	NR3C1	but2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550574	2908	2542611	109165	279065	-	SPAC29A4.05	NR3C1	cam2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550575	2908	2542556	109165	279013	-	SPAC6G10.07	NR3C1	cbc1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAC6G10.07	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550576	2908	2542481	109165	278941	-	SPAC29A4.04c	NR3C1	cbf5	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550577	2908	2539468	109165	276031	-	SPCC4B3.17	NR3C1	cbp3	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550578	2908	2539261	109165	275831	-	SPCC1682.04	NR3C1	cdc31	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550579	2908	2542744	109165	279194	-	SPAC1565.08	NR3C1	cdc48	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550580	2908	2541698	109165	278194	-	SPAC1556.05c	NR3C1	cgr1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550581	2908	2542078	109165	278555	-	SPAC26A3.05	NR3C1	chc1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550582	2908	2541972	109165	278457	-	SPAC23C11.11	NR3C1	cka1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	orb5	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550583	2908	2542669	109165	279122	-	SPAC29B12.08	NR3C1	clr5	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAC29B12.08	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550584	2908	2543595	109165	280010	-	SPAC4G9.11c	NR3C1	cmb1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550585	2908	2542639	109165	279093	-	SPAC2C4.05	NR3C1	cor1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAC2C4.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550586	2908	2543344	109165	279766	-	SPAC56E4.04c	NR3C1	cut6	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550587	2908	2542583	109165	279038	-	SPAC3A12.17c	NR3C1	cys12	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	cys1b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550588	2908	2541383	109165	277894	-	SPBP8B7.16c	NR3C1	dbp2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550589	2908	2540213	109165	276746	-	SPBC17D1.06	NR3C1	dbp3	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPCC17D1.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550590	2908	2540930	109165	277446	-	SPBC354.10	NR3C1	def1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550591	2908	2539048	109165	275621	-	SPCC1223.08c	NR3C1	dfr1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550592	2908	2540159	109165	276694	-	SPBC12C2.08	NR3C1	dnm1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550593	2908	2539278	109165	275846	-	SPCC1223.07c	NR3C1	drs1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550594	2908	3361538	109165	280614	-	SPAC1705.03c	NR3C1	ecm33	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAC23H4.19|SPAC1F2.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550595	2908	2543142	109165	279574	-	SPAC12G12.02	NR3C1	efg1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAC12G12.02|SPAC630.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550596	2908	2538740	109165	275323	-	SPCC794.08	NR3C1	efr3	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPCC794.08	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550597	2908	3361483	109165	280559	-	SPAC513.01c	NR3C1	eft201	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAPYUK71.04c|eft2-1|etf2|eft2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550598	2908	2540432	109165	276960	-	SPBC25H2.05	NR3C1	egd2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	nac1|ucp15	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550599	2908	2543082	109165	279515	-	SPAC3C7.08c	NR3C1	elf1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550600	2908	2543336	109165	279759	-	SPAC688.11	NR3C1	end4	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	sla2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550601	2908	2543379	109165	279801	-	SPAC821.09	NR3C1	eng1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550602	2908	2539782	109165	276332	-	SPBC1815.01	NR3C1	eno101	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	eno1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550603	2908	2539390	109165	275955	-	SPCC162.07	NR3C1	ent1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550604	2908	2542204	109165	278679	-	SPAC17A5.14	NR3C1	exo2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550605	2908	2543497	109165	279916	-	SPAC926.09c	NR3C1	fas1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550606	2908	2543618	109165	280032	-	SPAC4A8.11c	NR3C1	fas2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	lsd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550607	2908	2540767	109165	277287	-	SPBC19C2.07	NR3C1	fba1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550608	2908	2541531	109165	278031	-	SPAC25A8.01c	NR3C1	fft3	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	snf2SR	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550609	2908	2539727	109165	276279	-	SPBC1685.13	NR3C1	fhn1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550610	2908	2540479	109165	277007	-	SPBC2D10.10c	NR3C1	fib1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	fib|nop1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550611	2908	2542869	109165	279314	-	SPAC140.02	NR3C1	gar2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550612	2908	2541250	109165	277764	-	SPBC8D2.17	NR3C1	gmh4	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPBC8D2.17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550613	2908	2540975	109165	277491	-	SPBC354.12	NR3C1	gpd3	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550614	2908	2542085	109165	278562	-	SPAC26F1.06	NR3C1	gpm1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550615	2908	2542408	109165	278872	-	SPAC17A5.15c	NR3C1	gus1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAC17A5.15c|ers1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550616	2908	2541668	109165	278164	-	SPAC1F7.02c	NR3C1	has1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550617	2908	2542463	109165	278924	-	SPAC1834.03c	NR3C1	hhf1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	h4.1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550618	2908	2542467	109165	278928	-	SPAC1834.04	NR3C1	hht1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550619	2908	2540326	109165	276856	-	SPBC2G5.06c	NR3C1	hmt2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	cad1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550620	2908	2540633	109165	277159	-	SPBC21D10.12	NR3C1	hob1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550621	2908	2541160	109165	277675	-	SPBC725.09c	NR3C1	hob3	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550622	2908	2540026	109165	276570	-	SPBC16D10.08c	NR3C1	hsp104	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPBC16D10.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550623	2908	2540977	109165	277493	-	SPBC3E7.02c	NR3C1	hsp16	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550624	2908	2543539	109165	279956	-	SPAC926.04c	NR3C1	hsp90	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	git10|swo1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550625	2908	2539523	109165	276085	-	SPCC622.09	NR3C1	htb1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550626	2908	2541345	109165	277856	-	SPBP35G2.07	NR3C1	ilv1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550627	2908	3361354	109165	280430	-	SPBC56F2.12	NR3C1	ilv5	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550628	2908	2540112	109165	276649	-	SPBC11C11.02	NR3C1	imp2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550629	2908	2542514	109165	278972	-	SPAC19D5.05c	NR3C1	imp3	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550630	2908	2542446	109165	278907	-	SPAC19A8.07c	NR3C1	SPAC19A8.07c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550631	2908	2539746	109165	276298	-	SPBC17G9.03c	NR3C1	krs1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550632	2908	2538797	109165	275378	-	SPCC794.07	NR3C1	lat1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550633	2908	2540283	109165	276814	-	SPBC1A4.02c	NR3C1	leu1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPBC1E8.07c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550634	2908	2541500	109165	278002	-	SPAC227.18	NR3C1	lys3	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAC2F7.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550635	2908	2539671	109165	276226	-	SPBC1734.11	NR3C1	mas5	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550636	2908	2543131	109165	279563	-	SPAC12G12.04	NR3C1	mcp60	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	hsp60	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550637	2908	2543585	109165	280000	-	SPAC9.09	NR3C1	met26	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550638	2908	2540565	109165	277092	-	SPBC1D7.04	NR3C1	mlo3	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550639	2908	2540461	109165	276989	-	SPBC2G2.04c	NR3C1	mmf1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	pmf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550640	2908	2538743	109165	275326	-	SPCC1906.01	NR3C1	mpg1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550641	2908	2542139	109165	278615	-	SPAC18G6.07c	NR3C1	mra1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550642	2908	2543504	109165	279922	-	SPAC4G9.17c	NR3C1	mrps5	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550643	2908	2539962	109165	276506	-	SPBC11B10.04c	NR3C1	mrps28	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	pi007|SPACTOKYO_453.29	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550644	2908	2541268	109165	277782	-	SPBP19A11.03c	NR3C1	mts4	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpn1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550645	2908	2539659	109165	276214	-	SPBC146.13c	NR3C1	myo1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550646	2908	2539538	109165	276100	-	SPCC364.06	NR3C1	nap1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	nap11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550647	2908	2542520	109165	278978	-	SPAC20G8.09c	NR3C1	nat10	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAC20G8.09c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550648	2908	2540403	109165	276931	-	SPBC21D10.11c	NR3C1	nfs1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550649	2908	2542878	109165	279323	-	SPAC57A10.09c	NR3C1	nhp6	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550650	2908	2541087	109165	277602	-	SPBC646.10c	NR3C1	SPBC646.10c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550651	2908	2541814	109165	278305	-	SPAC23G3.06	NR3C1	SPAC23G3.06	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550652	2908	2539413	109165	275978	-	SPCP1E11.08	NR3C1	SPCP1E11.08	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550653	2908	2539743	109165	276295	-	SPBC16A3.08c	NR3C1	oga1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPBC16A3.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550654	2908	2539733	109165	276285	-	SPBC16E9.12c	NR3C1	pab2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550655	2908	2541579	109165	278076	-	SPAC26F1.03	NR3C1	pda1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550656	2908	2540273	109165	276804	-	SPBC30D10.13c	NR3C1	pdb1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	agg1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550657	2908	2540778	109165	277297	-	SPBC19G7.10c	NR3C1	SPBC19G7.10c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550658	2908	2539972	109165	276516	-	SPBC16H5.02	NR3C1	pfk1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550659	2908	2539764	109165	276315	-	SPBC14F5.04c	NR3C1	pgk1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550660	2908	2539093	109165	275665	-	SPCC736.15	NR3C1	pil1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPCC736.15	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550661	2908	2542497	109165	278956	-	SPAC1A6.04c	NR3C1	plb1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550662	2908	2542664	109165	279117	-	SPAC1071.10c	NR3C1	pma1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550663	2908	2539834	109165	276383	-	SPBC14C8.14c	NR3C1	pol5	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550664	2908	2540269	109165	276800	-	SPBC28F2.03	NR3C1	ppi1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	cyp2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550665	2908	2539645	109165	276200	-	SPBC146.07	NR3C1	prp2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550666	2908	2540431	109165	276959	-	SPBC19C7.06	NR3C1	prs1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550667	2908	2543178	109165	279608	-	SPAC31G5.15	NR3C1	psd3	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550668	2908	3361514	109165	280590	-	SPAC110.04c	NR3C1	pss1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAP14E8.01c|ssp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550669	2908	2543265	109165	279693	-	SPAC1002.13c	NR3C1	psu1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550670	2908	2539459	109165	276022	-	SPCC825.05c	NR3C1	pwi1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPCC825.05c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550671	2908	2543557	109165	279974	-	SPAC4H3.10c	NR3C1	pyk1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550672	2908	2539661	109165	276216	-	SPBC17G9.11c	NR3C1	pyr1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550673	2908	2539153	109165	275725	-	SPCC1682.01	NR3C1	qcr9	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550674	2908	2541051	109165	277566	-	SPBC3E7.08c	NR3C1	rad13	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550675	2908	2542029	109165	278511	-	SPAC8E11.02c	NR3C1	rad24	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	anr5|sam4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550676	2908	2542252	109165	278722	-	SPAC17A2.13c	NR3C1	rad25	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550677	2908	2540719	109165	277242	-	SPBC216.05	NR3C1	rad3	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550678	2908	2540052	109165	276590	-	SPBC17A3.04c	NR3C1	rar1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	mes1|mrs1|pi042	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550679	2908	2539942	109165	276486	-	SPBC17G9.05	NR3C1	rct1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	cyp6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550680	2908	2542306	109165	278773	-	SPAC29A4.11	NR3C1	rga3	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550681	2908	2541612	109165	278109	-	SPAC1F7.04	NR3C1	rho1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550682	2908	2543548	109165	279965	-	SPAC664.06	NR3C1	rlp7	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl7|rpl7-3|rpl703	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550683	2908	2540795	109165	277314	-	SPBC18E5.04	NR3C1	rpl1001	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl10|rpl10-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550684	2908	2541591	109165	278088	-	SPAC26A3.07c	NR3C1	rpl1101	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl11|rpl11-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550685	2908	2543553	109165	279970	-	SPAC664.05	NR3C1	rpl13	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550686	2908	2542425	109165	278887	-	SPAC1805.13	NR3C1	rpl14	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550687	2908	2542006	109165	278489	-	SPAC23A1.11	NR3C1	rpl1602	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl16-2|rpl13a-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550688	2908	2540358	109165	276887	-	SPBC2F12.04	NR3C1	rpl1701	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl17|rpl17-1|SPCC2F12.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550689	2908	2539013	109165	275586	-	SPCC364.03	NR3C1	rpl1702	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl17|rpl17-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550690	2908	3361377	109165	280453	-	SPAPB17E12.13	NR3C1	rpl1802	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl18-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550691	2908	2540870	109165	277387	-	SPBC56F2.02	NR3C1	rpl1901	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl19-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550692	2908	2539178	109165	275749	-	SPCC1682.14	NR3C1	rpl1902	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl19-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550693	2908	2542093	109165	278570	-	SPAC26A3.04	NR3C1	rpl2002	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl20|rpl20-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550694	2908	2540950	109165	277466	-	SPBC365.03c	NR3C1	rpl2101	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl21|rpl21-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550695	2908	2543021	109165	279457	-	SPAC11E3.15	NR3C1	rpl22	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAP8A3.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550696	2908	2543453	109165	279873	-	SPAC3G9.03	NR3C1	rpl2301	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl23-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550697	2908	2541570	109165	278067	-	SPAC6G9.09c	NR3C1	rpl2401	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl24|rpl24-01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550698	2908	2539701	109165	276254	-	SPBC106.18	NR3C1	rpl2501	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl25a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550699	2908	2540274	109165	276805	-	SPBC29B5.03c	NR3C1	rpl26	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550700	2908	2541156	109165	277671	-	SPBC685.07c	NR3C1	rpl2701	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl27-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550701	2908	2539336	109165	275902	-	SPCC74.05	NR3C1	rpl2702	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl27-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550702	2908	2541130	109165	277645	-	SPBC776.11	NR3C1	rpl2801	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl28-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550703	2908	2539548	109165	276109	-	SPCC5E4.07	NR3C1	rpl2802	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl28|rpl28-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550704	2908	2542265	109165	278734	-	SPAC17A5.03	NR3C1	rpl301	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl3|rpl3-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550705	2908	2539308	109165	275875	-	SPCC613.05c	NR3C1	rpl35	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550706	2908	2538715	109165	275299	-	SPCC1223.05c	NR3C1	rpl3702	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl37|rpl37-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550707	2908	2539277	109165	275845	-	SPCC663.04	NR3C1	rpl39	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550708	2908	2541344	109165	277855	-	SPBP8B7.03c	NR3C1	rpl402	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl4|rpl4-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550709	2908	2540682	109165	277207	-	SPBC800.04c	NR3C1	rpl4301	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl37a-1|rpl43|rpl43-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550710	2908	2542782	109165	279231	-	SPAC1687.06c	NR3C1	rpl44	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl28	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550711	2908	2543642	109165	280056	-	SPAC3H5.12c	NR3C1	rpl501	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl5|rpl5-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550712	2908	2539372	109165	275938	-	SPCC622.18	NR3C1	rpl6	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550713	2908	2540841	109165	277358	-	SPBC18H10.12c	NR3C1	rpl701	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl7|rpl7-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550714	2908	2540517	109165	277045	-	SPBC29A3.04	NR3C1	rpl8	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl701|rpl7a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550715	2908	5802952	109165	858090	-	SPAC1F7.13c	NR3C1	rpl801	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAC21E11.02c|rpk5a|rpl18|rpl2-1|rpl8-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550716	2908	2543380	109165	279802	-	SPAC4G9.16c	NR3C1	rpl901	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl9-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550717	2908	2539464	109165	276027	-	SPCC613.06	NR3C1	rpl902	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl9-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550718	2908	2543040	109165	279475	-	SPAC31G5.13	NR3C1	rpn11	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550719	2908	2538893	109165	275471	-	SPCC18.14c	NR3C1	rpp0	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550720	2908	2543293	109165	279718	-	SPAPJ698.02c	NR3C1	rps002	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rps0|rps0-2|rpsa-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550721	2908	2542561	109165	279017	-	SPAC31G5.17c	NR3C1	rps1001	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rps10-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550722	2908	3361259	109165	280335	-	SPBP22H7.08	NR3C1	rps1002	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rps10-2|rps10B|pi023|SPACTOKYO_453.11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550723	2908	2541737	109165	278231	-	SPAC22H12.04c	NR3C1	rps102	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rps1-2|rps3a-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550724	2908	2542904	109165	279348	-	SPAC144.11	NR3C1	rps1102	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rps11|rps11-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550725	2908	2542108	109165	278584	-	SPAC6F6.07c	NR3C1	rps13	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550726	2908	2540817	109165	277335	-	SPAC3H5.05c	NR3C1	rps1401	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rps14|rps14-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550727	2908	2538892	109165	275470	-	SPCC1393.03	NR3C1	rps1501	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rps15-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550728	2908	2542912	109165	279355	-	SPAC1071.07c	NR3C1	rps1502	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rps15|rps15-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550729	2908	2543559	109165	279975	-	SPAC664.04c	NR3C1	rps1602	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rps16|rps16-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550730	2908	2541229	109165	277743	-	SPBC839.05c	NR3C1	rps1701	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550731	2908	2540180	109165	276713	-	SPBC16D10.11c	NR3C1	rps1801	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rps18-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550732	2908	2540447	109165	276975	-	SPBC21C3.13	NR3C1	rps1901	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rps19-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550733	2908	2539067	109165	275639	-	SPCC576.08c	NR3C1	rps2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550734	2908	2539449	109165	276012	-	SPCC576.09	NR3C1	rps20	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550735	2908	2541838	109165	278329	-	SPAC22A12.04c	NR3C1	rps2201	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rps15a-1|rps22-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550736	2908	2542012	109165	278495	-	SPAC23C11.02c	NR3C1	rps23	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550737	2908	2542430	109165	278892	-	SPAC17G6.06	NR3C1	rps2401	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rps24|rps24-1|rps24a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550738	2908	2539848	109165	276396	-	SPBC17G9.07	NR3C1	rps2402	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rps24-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550739	2908	2543307	109165	279731	-	SPAC694.05c	NR3C1	rps2502	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rps25|rps25-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550740	2908	2543085	109165	279518	-	SPAC806.03c	NR3C1	rps2601	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rps26|rps26-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550741	2908	2539969	109165	276513	-	SPBC1685.10	NR3C1	rps27	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550742	2908	2539797	109165	276347	-	SPBC16G5.14c	NR3C1	rps3	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550743	2908	2540649	109165	277174	-	SPBC19F8.08	NR3C1	rps401	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550744	2908	2540325	109165	276855	-	SPBC21B10.10	NR3C1	rps402	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rps4-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550745	2908	2543486	109165	279906	-	SPAC959.07	NR3C1	rps403	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rps4|rps4-3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550746	2908	2541712	109165	278207	-	SPAC328.10c	NR3C1	rps502	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rps5-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550747	2908	2542870	109165	279315	-	SPAC13G6.07c	NR3C1	rps601	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rps6-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550748	2908	2542553	109165	279010	-	SPAC18G6.14c	NR3C1	rps7	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550749	2908	2541491	109165	277993	-	SPAC2C4.16c	NR3C1	rps801	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rps8|rps8-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550750	2908	2543354	109165	279776	-	SPAC521.05	NR3C1	rps802	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rps8-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550751	2908	2542629	109165	279083	-	SPAC24H6.07	NR3C1	rps901	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rps9-1|rps9a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550752	2908	2540367	109165	276896	-	SPBC29A3.12	NR3C1	rps902	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rps9-2|rps9b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550753	2908	2539862	109165	276409	-	SPBC16C6.07c	NR3C1	rpt1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550754	2908	2540939	109165	277455	-	SPBC4.07c	NR3C1	rpt2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	mts2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550755	2908	2539539	109165	276101	-	SPCC576.10c	NR3C1	rpt3	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550756	2908	2538897	109165	275475	-	SPCC1183.07	NR3C1	SPCC1183.07	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550757	2908	2542545	109165	279002	-	SPAC19G12.07c	NR3C1	rsd1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550758	2908	2541077	109165	277592	-	SPBC83.08	NR3C1	rvb2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550759	2908	2539943	109165	276487	-	SPBC14F5.05c	NR3C1	sam1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550760	2908	2539285	109165	275853	-	SPCC1672.02c	NR3C1	sap1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550761	2908	2540439	109165	276967	-	SPBC31F10.06c	NR3C1	sar1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	psr1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550762	2908	2541242	109165	277756	-	SPBC8D2.05c	NR3C1	sfi1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550763	2908	2542338	109165	278804	-	SPAC16E8.01	NR3C1	shd1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	sla1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550764	2908	2542651	109165	279105	-	SPAC24C9.12c	NR3C1	SPAC24C9.12c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550765	2908	2542242	109165	278713	-	SPAC18G6.04c	NR3C1	shm2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550766	2908	2542920	109165	279361	-	SPAC10F6.01c	NR3C1	sir1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAC4C5.05c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550767	2908	2540199	109165	276732	-	SPBC1709.05	NR3C1	sks2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	hsc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550768	2908	2542689	109165	279142	-	SPAC29B12.04	NR3C1	snz1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550769	2908	2540796	109165	277315	-	SPBC1A4.07c	NR3C1	sof1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPBC1A4.07c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550770	2908	2540149	109165	276686	-	SPBC1289.03c	NR3C1	spi1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550771	2908	2539310	109165	275877	-	SPCC285.17	NR3C1	spp27	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	uaf30	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550772	2908	2542772	109165	279221	-	SPAC16.02c	NR3C1	srp2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550773	2908	2539391	109165	275956	-	SPCC1682.05c	NR3C1	srp68	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550774	2908	2539225	109165	275795	-	SPCC1739.13	NR3C1	ssa2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550775	2908	2543026	109165	279462	-	SPAC664.11	NR3C1	ssc1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	ssp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550776	2908	2542131	109165	278607	-	SPAC57A7.12	NR3C1	SPAC57A7.12	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550777	2908	2541216	109165	277730	-	SPBC776.09	NR3C1	ste13	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550778	2908	2540422	109165	276950	-	SPBC27.08c	NR3C1	sua1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPBC28F2.01c|asp1|met3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550779	2908	2543537	109165	279954	-	SPAC4D7.05	NR3C1	sum1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	tif34	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550780	2908	2538689	109165	275274	-	SPCC1795.11	NR3C1	sum3	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	ded1|moc2|slh3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550781	2908	2538977	109165	275551	-	SPCC1020.06c	NR3C1	tal1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550782	2908	14217452	109165	4253814	-	SPBC14C8.19	NR3C1	tam10	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550783	2908	2540547	109165	277074	-	SPBC32F12.11	NR3C1	tdh1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	gpd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550784	2908	2541984	109165	278469	-	SPAC23A1.10	NR3C1	tef102	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	ef1a-b|ef1a-d|efa1|SPBC24E9.15c|tef1-b|tef1-d	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550785	2908	2539295	109165	275863	-	SPCC417.08	NR3C1	tef3	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550786	2908	2540526	109165	277054	-	SPBC26H8.01	NR3C1	thi2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	nmt2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550787	2908	2540521	109165	277049	-	SPBC25H2.07	NR3C1	tif11	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550788	2908	2543455	109165	279875	-	SPAC3G9.09c	NR3C1	tif211	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	eIF2alpha	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550789	2908	2542942	109165	279383	-	SPAC32A11.04c	NR3C1	tif212	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAC6B12.17c|tif22	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550790	2908	2539738	109165	276290	-	SPBC17G9.09	NR3C1	tif213	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550791	2908	2539938	109165	276482	-	SPBC17D11.05	NR3C1	tif32	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550792	2908	2543621	109165	280035	-	SPAC4A8.16c	NR3C1	tif33	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAC823.01c|SPAC1E11.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550793	2908	2540819	109165	277337	-	SPBC18H10.03	NR3C1	tif35	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550794	2908	2542290	109165	278758	-	SPAC17C9.03	NR3C1	tif471	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550795	2908	2540232	109165	276764	-	SPBC336.10c	NR3C1	tif512	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550796	2908	2541152	109165	277667	-	SPBC713.10	NR3C1	tim16	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550797	2908	2542959	109165	279399	-	SPAC6F12.07	NR3C1	tom20	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550798	2908	2543304	109165	279728	-	SPAC6B12.12	NR3C1	tom70	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550799	2908	2538729	109165	275313	-	SPCC24B10.21	NR3C1	tpi1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	tpi	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550800	2908	2542077	109165	278554	-	SPAC27D7.14c	NR3C1	tpr1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAC637.02c|ctr9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550801	2908	2539572	109165	276132	-	SPCC576.03c	NR3C1	tpx1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550802	2908	2540550	109165	277077	-	SPBC25H2.02	NR3C1	trs1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	ths1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550803	2908	2542084	109165	278561	-	SPAC7D4.07c	NR3C1	trx1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550804	2908	2542138	109165	278614	-	SPAC589.10c	NR3C1	SPAC589.10c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550805	2908	2541544	109165	278044	-	SPAC22G7.06c	NR3C1	ura1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550806	2908	2541176	109165	277690	-	SPBC776.08c	NR3C1	utp22	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPBC776.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550807	2908	2543484	109165	279904	-	SPAC959.03c	NR3C1	SPAC959.03c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550808	2908	2539425	109165	275990	-	SPCC550.14	NR3C1	vgl1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550809	2908	2543408	109165	279830	-	SPAC637.05c	NR3C1	vma2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550810	2908	2542384	109165	278848	-	SPAC17A2.03c	NR3C1	vma6	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550811	2908	2540197	109165	276730	-	SPBC1709.02c	NR3C1	vrs1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPBC1734.18c|ValRS1|vas1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550812	2908	2539400	109165	275965	-	SPCC663.02	NR3C1	wtf14	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550813	2908	2540773	109165	277293	-	SPBC405.06	NR3C1	SPBC405.06	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550814	2908	2539801	109165	276351	-	SPBC1778.01c	NR3C1	zuo1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPBC30D10.01|mpp11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550815	2908	2543269	109165	279697	-	SPAC1002.09c	NR3C1	dld1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	dldh	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550816	2908	2542948	109165	279388	-	SPAC1006.07	NR3C1	SPAC1006.07	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	tif1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550817	2908	2543051	109165	279486	-	SPAC1071.08	NR3C1	rpp203	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rla6|rpp2-3|rpa2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550818	2908	2542925	109165	279366	-	SPAC11E3.04c	NR3C1	ubc13	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	spu13|sst5	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550819	2908	2541818	109165	278309	-	SPAC11G7.02	NR3C1	pub1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550820	2908	2541894	109165	278384	-	SPAC11G7.03	NR3C1	idh1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	glu3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550821	2908	5802965	109165	858103	-	SPAC11H11.06	NR3C1	arp2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAC22F8.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550822	2908	2542661	109165	279114	-	SPAC1250.05	NR3C1	rpl3002	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl30|rpl30-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550823	2908	2543025	109165	279461	-	SPAC1296.02	NR3C1	cox4	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550824	2908	2542881	109165	279326	-	SPAC13F5.03c	NR3C1	gld1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550825	2908	2542817	109165	279264	-	SPAC13G6.02c	NR3C1	rps101	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rps1-1|rps3a-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550826	2908	2542895	109165	279339	-	SPAC13G6.10c	NR3C1	asl1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550827	2908	2542875	109165	279320	-	SPAC13G7.02c	NR3C1	ssa1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550828	2908	2542868	109165	279313	-	SPAC1420.02c	NR3C1	cct5	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550829	2908	2542854	109165	279300	-	SPAC144.02	NR3C1	iec1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550830	2908	2542823	109165	279270	-	SPAC144.03	NR3C1	ade2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	min10|min3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550831	2908	2541428	109165	277933	-	SPAC14C4.11	NR3C1	SPAC14C4.11	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550832	2908	2541690	109165	278186	-	SPAC1556.02c	NR3C1	sdh1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550833	2908	2542765	109165	279215	-	SPAC15E1.08	NR3C1	naa10	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	ard1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550834	2908	2542750	109165	279200	-	SPAC1635.01	NR3C1	SPAC1635.01	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550835	2908	3361541	109165	280617	-	SPAC167.05	NR3C1	SPAC167.05	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAC57A7.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550836	2908	2542303	109165	278770	-	SPAC1687.21	NR3C1	SPAC1687.21	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAC222.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550837	2908	2542327	109165	278793	-	SPAC16C9.06c	NR3C1	upf1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550838	2908	2541706	109165	278201	-	SPAC16E8.15	NR3C1	tif45	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	tif1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550839	2908	2542347	109165	278812	-	SPAC1751.03	NR3C1	SPAC1751.03	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	csn7|csn72|csn7b|SPAC31A2.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550840	2908	2542357	109165	278822	-	SPAC1782.07	NR3C1	qcr8	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550841	2908	2542369	109165	278833	-	SPAC1782.10c	NR3C1	nhp2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550842	2908	2542370	109165	278834	-	SPAC1783.08c	NR3C1	rpl1502	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl15-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550843	2908	2542396	109165	278860	-	SPAC17G6.09	NR3C1	sec62	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550844	2908	2542383	109165	278847	-	SPAC17H9.17c	NR3C1	mdm10	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550845	2908	2542538	109165	278995	-	SPAC1805.11c	NR3C1	rps2602	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rps26-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550846	2908	2542115	109165	278591	-	SPAC1834.02	NR3C1	aro1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550847	2908	2542564	109165	279020	-	SPAC1851.03	NR3C1	ckb1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550848	2908	2542134	109165	278610	-	SPAC18G6.06	NR3C1	SPAC18G6.06	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550849	2908	2542572	109165	279028	-	SPAC1952.08c	NR3C1	SPAC1952.08c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550850	2908	2542456	109165	278917	-	SPAC19G12.05	NR3C1	SPAC19G12.05	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550851	2908	2542483	109165	278943	-	SPAC19G12.09	NR3C1	SPAC19G12.09	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550852	2908	2542465	109165	278926	-	SPAC19G12.10c	NR3C1	cpy1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	pcy1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550853	2908	14218174	109165	4254536	-	SPAC19G12.17	NR3C1	erh1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	new10|iss6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550854	2908	2542512	109165	278970	-	SPAC1B3.01c	NR3C1	SPAC1B3.01c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550855	2908	2542217	109165	278691	-	SPAC1B3.13	NR3C1	nan1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAC1B3.13	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550856	2908	2542459	109165	278920	-	SPAC1D4.03c	NR3C1	aut12	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550857	2908	2542499	109165	278958	-	SPAC1F12.04c	NR3C1	SPAC1F12.04c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550858	2908	2542269	109165	278738	-	SPAC1F12.07	NR3C1	SPAC1F12.07	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550859	2908	2541641	109165	278137	-	SPAC1F12.10c	NR3C1	SPAC1F12.10c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550860	2908	2541461	109165	277963	-	SPAC1F3.09	NR3C1	mug161	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550861	2908	2541460	109165	277962	-	SPAC1F5.02	NR3C1	pdi1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAC1F5.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550862	2908	2542064	109165	278541	-	SPAC21E11.06	NR3C1	tif224	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550863	2908	2541418	109165	277924	-	SPAC22A12.07c	NR3C1	ogm1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	oma1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550864	2908	2541809	109165	278300	-	SPAC22A12.11	NR3C1	dak1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550865	2908	2541811	109165	278302	-	SPAC22A12.16	NR3C1	SPAC22A12.16	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550866	2908	2542062	109165	278540	-	SPAC22F8.06	NR3C1	pam1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550867	2908	2542011	109165	278494	-	SPAC23C11.05	NR3C1	ipp1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAC23C11.05|ppa|ppa1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550868	2908	2541910	109165	278400	-	SPAC23C4.15	NR3C1	rpb5	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550869	2908	2541502	109165	278004	-	SPAC23D3.04c	NR3C1	gpd2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550870	2908	2541484	109165	277986	-	SPAC23D3.12	NR3C1	SPAC23D3.12	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550871	2908	2541486	109165	277988	-	SPAC23D3.13c	NR3C1	SPAC23D3.13c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550872	2908	2541812	109165	278303	-	SPAC23G3.12c	NR3C1	SPAC23G3.12c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550873	2908	2541670	109165	278166	-	SPAC24H6.13	NR3C1	SPAC24H6.13	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550874	2908	2541651	109165	278147	-	SPAC25B8.12c	NR3C1	SPAC25B8.12c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550875	2908	5802955	109165	858093	-	SPAC25G10.09c	NR3C1	pan1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAC27F1.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550876	2908	2542670	109165	279123	-	SPAC26F1.13c	NR3C1	lrs1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550877	2908	2542694	109165	279147	-	SPAC26H5.10c	NR3C1	tif51	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550878	2908	2542690	109165	279143	-	SPAC27D7.07c	NR3C1	smd1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550879	2908	2541479	109165	277981	-	SPAC27F1.06c	NR3C1	SPAC27F1.06c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550880	2908	2542298	109165	278765	-	SPAC29A4.02c	NR3C1	SPAC29A4.02c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	tef3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550881	2908	2541804	109165	278295	-	SPAC29A4.18	NR3C1	prw1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550882	2908	2542721	109165	279172	-	SPAC29E6.06c	NR3C1	SPAC29E6.06c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAC30.10c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550883	2908	2542480	109165	278940	-	SPAC2C4.03c	NR3C1	smd2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	cwf9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550884	2908	2541914	109165	278404	-	SPAC2F3.03c	NR3C1	rpa49	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpa51	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550885	2908	2541705	109165	278200	-	SPAC30D11.12	NR3C1	rpl3802	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl38-2|rps38	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550886	2908	2542609	109165	279063	-	SPAC31G5.04	NR3C1	lys12	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAC31G5.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550887	2908	2542660	109165	279113	-	SPAC328.03	NR3C1	tps1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550888	2908	2541660	109165	278156	-	SPAC343.05	NR3C1	vma1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550889	2908	2543105	109165	279537	-	SPAC343.10	NR3C1	met11	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	mthfr2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550890	2908	2543119	109165	279551	-	SPAC3A11.07	NR3C1	nde2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAC3A11.07	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550891	2908	3361462	109165	280538	-	SPAC3A11.12c	NR3C1	rpt5	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	pam2|tbp1|SPAC3H5.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550892	2908	2543041	109165	279476	-	SPAC3C7.11c	NR3C1	cnx1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	cal1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550893	2908	2543207	109165	279636	-	SPAC3C7.13c	NR3C1	SPAC3C7.13c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550894	2908	2543686	109165	280100	-	SPAC3C7.14c	NR3C1	obr1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	apt1|uhp1|p25	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550895	2908	2543181	109165	279611	-	SPAC3F10.03	NR3C1	grs1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550896	2908	2543448	109165	279868	-	SPAC3H5.07	NR3C1	rpl702	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550897	2908	2543460	109165	279880	-	SPAC3H5.10	NR3C1	rpl3202	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl32|rpl32-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550898	2908	2543626	109165	280040	-	SPAC4D7.08c	NR3C1	ade4	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	aza1|min13	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550899	2908	2543252	109165	279680	-	SPAC4F10.10c	NR3C1	mnn9	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550900	2908	2543459	109165	279879	-	SPAC4F8.03	NR3C1	sdo1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAC644.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550901	2908	2543607	109165	280022	-	SPAC4F8.07c	NR3C1	hxk2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550902	2908	2542704	109165	279157	-	SPAC4G9.03	NR3C1	adk1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550903	2908	2543391	109165	279813	-	SPAC4G9.09c	NR3C1	arg11	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550904	2908	2543385	109165	279807	-	SPAC4G9.12	NR3C1	SPAC4G9.12	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550905	2908	2543241	109165	279669	-	SPAC56F8.03	NR3C1	SPAC56F8.03	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550906	2908	2541530	109165	278030	-	SPAC57A10.10c	NR3C1	sla1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550907	2908	2541505	109165	278007	-	SPAC57A7.04c	NR3C1	pabp	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	pab1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550908	2908	2542247	109165	278717	-	SPAC57A7.10c	NR3C1	sec21	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550909	2908	3361544	109165	280620	-	SPAC5D6.13	NR3C1	SPAC5D6.13	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAPJ735.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550910	2908	2541553	109165	278052	-	SPAC5H10.10	NR3C1	SPAC5H10.10	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550911	2908	2542663	109165	279116	-	SPAC607.03c	NR3C1	snu13	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550912	2908	2543412	109165	279834	-	SPAC637.07	NR3C1	moe1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550913	2908	2543298	109165	279723	-	SPAC6B12.15	NR3C1	cpc2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rkp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550914	2908	2543283	109165	279709	-	SPAC6C3.04	NR3C1	cit1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550915	2908	2541767	109165	278261	-	SPAC6G9.07c	NR3C1	arc4	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	arp10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550916	2908	2541978	109165	278463	-	SPAC6G9.12	NR3C1	cfr1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550917	2908	2543153	109165	279585	-	SPAC821.05	NR3C1	SPAC821.05	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550918	2908	2543403	109165	279825	-	SPAC823.04	NR3C1	SPAC823.04	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550919	2908	2543475	109165	279895	-	SPAC890.08	NR3C1	rpl31	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550920	2908	2542017	109165	278500	-	SPAC8C9.15c	NR3C1	tif225	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550921	2908	2543337	109165	279760	-	SPAC959.08	NR3C1	rpl2102	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl21|rpl21-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550922	2908	2543325	109165	279748	-	SPAC977.14c	NR3C1	SPAC977.14c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550923	2908	2543311	109165	279735	-	SPAC977.15	NR3C1	SPAC977.15	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550924	2908	2543296	109165	279721	-	SPAC9E9.03	NR3C1	leu2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550925	2908	2542976	109165	279414	-	SPAC9E9.09c	NR3C1	atd1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAC9E9.09c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550926	2908	2542917	109165	279358	-	SPAC9E9.11	NR3C1	plr1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	plr	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550927	2908	2542848	109165	279294	-	SPAC9G1.03c	NR3C1	rpl3001	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl30|rpl30-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550928	2908	2542594	109165	279048	-	SPACUNK4.10	NR3C1	SPACUNK4.10	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550929	2908	2542498	109165	278957	-	SPACUNK4.16c	NR3C1	SPACUNK4.16c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550930	2908	2542371	109165	278835	-	SPACUNK4.17	NR3C1	SPACUNK4.17	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550931	2908	2542573	109165	279029	-	SPAP7G5.02c	NR3C1	gua2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550932	2908	2542079	109165	278556	-	SPAP7G5.04c	NR3C1	lys1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550933	2908	2543227	109165	279655	-	SPAPB8E5.09	NR3C1	rvb1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550934	2908	2542267	109165	278736	-	SPAPYUK71.03c	NR3C1	syn1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550935	2908	2540049	109165	276587	-	SPBC106.03	NR3C1	SPBC106.03	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550936	2908	2540063	109165	276601	-	SPBC106.05c	NR3C1	tim11	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550937	2908	2540053	109165	276591	-	SPBC106.06	NR3C1	cct4	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550938	2908	2539815	109165	276365	-	SPBC1105.02c	NR3C1	lys4	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550939	2908	2540109	109165	276646	-	SPBC119.01	NR3C1	rpn3	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPBPJ4664.07	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550940	2908	2539704	109165	276257	-	SPBC119.10	NR3C1	asn1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550941	2908	2539978	109165	276522	-	SPBC11C11.06c	NR3C1	SPBC11C11.06c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550942	2908	2540082	109165	276620	-	SPBC1215.02c	NR3C1	naa25	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	arm1|mdm20	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550943	2908	2539812	109165	276362	-	SPBC1347.02	NR3C1	fkbp39	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550944	2908	2539798	109165	276348	-	SPBC146.14c	NR3C1	sec26	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPBC337.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550945	2908	2539692	109165	276246	-	SPBC14C8.03	NR3C1	fma2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550946	2908	2539794	109165	276344	-	SPBC14C8.12	NR3C1	rpb8	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550947	2908	2539863	109165	276410	-	SPBC14F5.03c	NR3C1	kap123	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550948	2908	2539758	109165	276310	-	SPBC1539.05	NR3C1	cog3	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550949	2908	2539625	109165	276182	-	SPBC1604.05	NR3C1	pgi1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550950	2908	2539928	109165	276472	-	SPBC1604.08c	NR3C1	imp1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550951	2908	2540744	109165	277267	-	SPBC1604.21c	NR3C1	ptr3	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPBC211.09|uba1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550952	2908	2539643	109165	276198	-	SPBC1685.09	NR3C1	rps29	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550953	2908	2540039	109165	276579	-	SPBC16A3.02c	NR3C1	SPBC16A3.02c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550954	2908	2539864	109165	276411	-	SPBC16A3.15c	NR3C1	nda2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550955	2908	2540135	109165	276672	-	SPBC16C6.11	NR3C1	rpl3201	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl32-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550956	2908	2540050	109165	276588	-	SPBC16C6.13c	NR3C1	sec27	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPBC244.03	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550957	2908	3361210	109165	280286	-	SPBC16E9.16c	NR3C1	lsd90	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550958	2908	2540075	109165	276613	-	SPBC16H5.06	NR3C1	rip1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550959	2908	2539879	109165	276425	-	SPBC1703.07	NR3C1	SPBC1703.07	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550960	2908	2539687	109165	276242	-	SPBC1711.05	NR3C1	SPBC1711.05	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550961	2908	2539780	109165	276330	-	SPBC1711.06	NR3C1	rpl401	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl4|rpl4-1|rpl4-2|rpl402	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550962	2908	2540046	109165	276584	-	SPBC1773.10c	NR3C1	nrs1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	ded81	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550963	2908	2539616	109165	276174	-	SPBC17G9.02c	NR3C1	cdc73	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPBC17G9.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550964	2908	2540806	109165	277325	-	SPBC18E5.06	NR3C1	rps21	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550965	2908	2540731	109165	277254	-	SPBC18H10.02	NR3C1	lcf1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550966	2908	3361295	109165	280371	-	SPBC1921.01c	NR3C1	rpl35b	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl37|rpl37-1|rpl3701|SPBC29C10.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550967	2908	2540648	109165	277173	-	SPBC1921.05	NR3C1	ape2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	ape1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550968	2908	2540602	109165	277128	-	SPBC19F5.04	NR3C1	SPBC19F5.04	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550969	2908	2540541	109165	277068	-	SPBC1A4.03c	NR3C1	top2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	ptr11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550970	2908	2540567	109165	277094	-	SPBC1A4.08c	NR3C1	cct3	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550971	2908	2540455	109165	276983	-	SPBC215.05	NR3C1	gpd1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550972	2908	2540616	109165	277142	-	SPBC215.09c	NR3C1	erg10	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550973	2908	2540613	109165	277139	-	SPBC216.03	NR3C1	SPBC216.03	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550974	2908	2540771	109165	277291	-	SPBC21B10.04c	NR3C1	nrf1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550975	2908	2540635	109165	277161	-	SPBC23G7.08c	NR3C1	rga7	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550976	2908	2540587	109165	277113	-	SPBC23G7.15c	NR3C1	rpp202	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpp2-2|rpa4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550977	2908	2540387	109165	276915	-	SPBC24C6.04	NR3C1	SPBC24C6.04	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550978	2908	2540582	109165	277108	-	SPBC26H8.07c	NR3C1	nda3	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	alp12|ben1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550979	2908	2540287	109165	276818	-	SPBC29A10.08	NR3C1	gas2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550980	2908	2540533	109165	277061	-	SPBC29A10.16c	NR3C1	SPBC29A10.16c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550981	2908	2540409	109165	276937	-	SPBC2D10.11c	NR3C1	nap2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	nap1.2|nap12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550982	2908	2540357	109165	276886	-	SPBC2F12.05c	NR3C1	SPBC2F12.05c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550983	2908	2540315	109165	276845	-	SPBC2F12.14c	NR3C1	gua1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550984	2908	2540360	109165	276889	-	SPBC2G5.01	NR3C1	SPBC2G5.01	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550985	2908	2540344	109165	276873	-	SPBC30D10.03c	NR3C1	SPBC30D10.03c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550986	2908	2540475	109165	277003	-	SPBC30D10.06	NR3C1	lsm4	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550987	2908	3361269	109165	280345	-	SPBC31A8.01c	NR3C1	rtn1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPBC651.13c|cwl1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550988	2908	2540327	109165	276857	-	SPBC31F10.07	NR3C1	lsb5	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550989	2908	2540222	109165	276755	-	SPBC32F12.03c	NR3C1	gpx1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550990	2908	2540254	109165	276785	-	SPBC32F12.10	NR3C1	SPBC32F12.10	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550991	2908	2541026	109165	277541	-	SPBC337.09	NR3C1	erg28	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550992	2908	2540959	109165	277475	-	SPBC365.12c	NR3C1	ish1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	isp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550993	2908	2540971	109165	277487	-	SPBC3D6.12	NR3C1	dip2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPBC3D6.12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550994	2908	2541003	109165	277518	-	SPBC3E7.16c	NR3C1	leu3	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPBC4F6.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550995	2908	2541034	109165	277549	-	SPBC405.01	NR3C1	ade1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPBC4C3.02c|min4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550996	2908	2540644	109165	277169	-	SPBC405.07	NR3C1	rpl3602	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl36|rpl36-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550997	2908	2541050	109165	277565	-	SPBC428.05c	NR3C1	arg12	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550998	2908	2540849	109165	277366	-	SPBC428.11	NR3C1	met17	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPBC428.11|cys2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2550999	2908	2540857	109165	277374	-	SPBC4C3.03	NR3C1	SPBC4C3.03	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551000	2908	2540868	109165	277385	-	SPBC4C3.07	NR3C1	SPBC4C3.07	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	csn6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551001	2908	2540878	109165	277395	-	SPBC4C3.10c	NR3C1	pre3	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551002	2908	2540889	109165	277406	-	SPBC530.07c	NR3C1	SPBC530.07c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551003	2908	2541060	109165	277575	-	SPBC56F2.09c	NR3C1	arg5	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551004	2908	2540910	109165	277426	-	SPBC577.02	NR3C1	rpl3801	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl38-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551005	2908	2540883	109165	277400	-	SPBC577.06c	NR3C1	stt4	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551006	2908	2540794	109165	277313	-	SPBC582.07c	NR3C1	rpn7	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551007	2908	2541070	109165	277585	-	SPBC646.07c	NR3C1	SPBC646.07c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551008	2908	2541117	109165	277632	-	SPBC646.13	NR3C1	sds23	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	moc1|psp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551009	2908	2541115	109165	277630	-	SPBC660.07	NR3C1	ntp1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551010	2908	2541144	109165	277659	-	SPBC685.06	NR3C1	rps001	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rps0|rps0-1|rpsa-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551011	2908	2541162	109165	277677	-	SPBC691.03c	NR3C1	apl3	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	pi033|SPACTOKYO_453.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551012	2908	2541131	109165	277646	-	SPBC713.02c	NR3C1	ubp15	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	ubp21|ubpD	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551013	2908	2541217	109165	277731	-	SPBC839.16	NR3C1	thf1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPBC839.16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551014	2908	2541245	109165	277759	-	SPBC8D2.06	NR3C1	irs1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551015	2908	2541273	109165	277787	-	SPBC8D2.20c	NR3C1	sec31	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551016	2908	2540211	109165	276744	-	SPBC947.15c	NR3C1	nde1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPBC947.15c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551017	2908	2540210	109165	276743	-	SPBC9B6.04c	NR3C1	tuf1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551018	2908	2541280	109165	277793	-	SPBP23A10.07	NR3C1	rpa2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551019	2908	2541329	109165	277841	-	SPBP23A10.11c	NR3C1	SPBP23A10.11c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551020	2908	2541300	109165	277812	-	SPBP23A10.15c	NR3C1	qcr1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	mas1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551021	2908	2541350	109165	277861	-	SPBP4H10.11c	NR3C1	lcf2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551022	2908	2541368	109165	277879	-	SPBP4H10.21c	NR3C1	sld5	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551023	2908	2541362	109165	277873	-	SPBP8B7.05c	NR3C1	nce103	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPBP8B7.05c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551024	2908	2541296	109165	277808	-	SPBP8B7.06	NR3C1	rpp201	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpp2|rpp2-1|rpa2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551025	2908	2541373	109165	277884	-	SPBP8B7.18c	NR3C1	SPBP8B7.18c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551026	2908	2541355	109165	277866	-	SPBP8B7.19	NR3C1	spt16	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551027	2908	2539222	109165	275792	-	SPCC1183.08c	NR3C1	rpl101	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl1-1|rpl10a-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551028	2908	2539154	109165	275726	-	SPCC11E10.07c	NR3C1	SPCC11E10.07c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551029	2908	2539108	109165	275680	-	SPCC1223.02	NR3C1	nmt1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	thi3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551030	2908	2538717	109165	275301	-	SPCC1235.02	NR3C1	bio2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPCC320.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551031	2908	2539240	109165	275810	-	SPCC1235.14	NR3C1	ght5	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551032	2908	2538906	109165	275483	-	SPCC1259.03	NR3C1	rpa12	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551033	2908	2538753	109165	275336	-	SPCC1281.06c	NR3C1	SPCC1281.06c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551034	2908	2539148	109165	275720	-	SPCC132.04c	NR3C1	gdh2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551035	2908	2538877	109165	275456	-	SPCC1322.04	NR3C1	fyu1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPCC1322.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551036	2908	2538734	109165	275318	-	SPCC1322.13	NR3C1	ade6	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	min1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551037	2908	2538788	109165	275369	-	SPCC1322.14c	NR3C1	vtc4	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551038	2908	2539183	109165	275754	-	SPCC1450.13c	NR3C1	SPCC1450.13c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551039	2908	2538881	109165	275460	-	SPCC1620.14c	NR3C1	snf22	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPCC830.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551040	2908	2539269	109165	275839	-	SPCC1672.05c	NR3C1	yrs1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551041	2908	2539137	109165	275709	-	SPCC1682.08c	NR3C1	mcp2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPCC1682.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551042	2908	2538713	109165	275297	-	SPCC1682.09c	NR3C1	gcg1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPCC1682.09c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551043	2908	2539189	109165	275760	-	SPCC1682.16	NR3C1	rpt4	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPCC306.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551044	2908	2538772	109165	275355	-	SPCC16A11.10c	NR3C1	oca8	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551045	2908	2539186	109165	275757	-	SPCC16C4.13c	NR3C1	rpl1201	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpl12-1|rpl12.1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551046	2908	2539253	109165	275823	-	SPCC1827.03c	NR3C1	SPCC1827.03c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551047	2908	2539267	109165	275837	-	SPCC1827.06c	NR3C1	SPCC1827.06c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551048	2908	2538976	109165	275550	-	SPCC1840.04	NR3C1	pca1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551049	2908	2539331	109165	275897	-	SPCC24B10.09	NR3C1	rps1702	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rps17|rps17-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551050	2908	2538766	109165	275349	-	SPCC306.08c	NR3C1	SPCC306.08c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551051	2908	2538791	109165	275372	-	SPCC320.10	NR3C1	srp72	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551052	2908	2538768	109165	275351	-	SPCC330.05c	NR3C1	ura4	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551053	2908	2538739	109165	275322	-	SPCC338.06c	NR3C1	SPCC338.06c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551054	2908	2539338	109165	275904	-	SPCC338.07c	NR3C1	naa15	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551055	2908	2538862	109165	275442	-	SPCC338.10c	NR3C1	cox5	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551056	2908	2539490	109165	276053	-	SPCC364.07	NR3C1	ser3	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPCC364.07|SPCC4G3.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551057	2908	2539489	109165	276052	-	SPCC550.06c	NR3C1	hsp10	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551058	2908	2538859	109165	275439	-	SPCC553.11c	NR3C1	toa2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPCC553.11c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551059	2908	2539020	109165	275593	-	SPCC5E4.06	NR3C1	smc6	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rad18	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551060	2908	2539499	109165	276062	-	SPCC622.08c	NR3C1	hta1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551061	2908	2539147	109165	275719	-	SPCC622.12c	NR3C1	gdh1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551062	2908	2539401	109165	275966	-	SPCC63.12c	NR3C1	pup3	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551063	2908	2538827	109165	275408	-	SPCC63.14	NR3C1	eis1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPCC63.14	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551064	2908	2539474	109165	276037	-	SPCC645.14c	NR3C1	sti1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551065	2908	2539534	109165	276096	-	SPCC663.13c	NR3C1	naa50	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	nat5	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551066	2908	2539452	109165	276015	-	SPCC70.03c	NR3C1	SPCC70.03c	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551067	2908	2539439	109165	276002	-	SPCC737.02c	NR3C1	qcr7	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551068	2908	3361134	109165	280210	-	SPCC737.09c	NR3C1	hmt1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPCC74.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551069	2908	2539109	109165	275681	-	SPCC74.03c	NR3C1	ssp2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	ucp9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551070	2908	2539418	109165	275983	-	SPCC757.07c	NR3C1	ctt1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	cta1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551071	2908	2539592	109165	276150	-	SPCC794.12c	NR3C1	mae2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551072	2908	2539002	109165	275576	-	SPCC830.07c	NR3C1	psi1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	psi	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551073	2908	2539171	109165	275742	-	SPCC830.08c	NR3C1	yop1	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551074	2908	2539601	109165	276159	-	SPCC965.07c	NR3C1	gst2	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551075	2908	2539526	109165	276088	-	SPCC970.03	NR3C1	SPCC970.03	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551076	2908	2539569	109165	276129	-	SPCPB16A4.03c	NR3C1	ade10	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	at 39 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2551077	2908	2539938	109165	276482	-	SPBC17D11.05	NR3C1	tif32	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2551078	2908	2543621	109165	280035	-	SPAC4A8.16c	NR3C1	tif33	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	SPAC823.01c|SPAC1E11.01c	Two-hybrid	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2551079	2908	2541268	109165	277782	-	SPBP19A11.03c	NR3C1	mts4	GCCR|GCR|GCRST|GR|GRL	rpn1	Two-hybrid	physical	Ptushkina M (2017)	28935859	9606	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2551080	2539942	2540821	276486	277339	SPBC17G9.05	SPBC800.03	rct1	clr3	cyp6	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Chang AY (2017)	28636937	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	-	-	BIOGRID
2551081	2539942	2540565	276486	277092	SPBC17G9.05	SPBC1D7.04	rct1	mlo3	cyp6	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chang AY (2017)	28636937	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2551082	2539942	2543630	276486	280044	SPBC17G9.05	SPAC1F3.01	rct1	rrp6	cyp6	SPAC3H8.11	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chang AY (2017)	28636937	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2551083	2539942	2539403	276486	275968	SPBC17G9.05	SPCC736.11	rct1	ago1	cyp6	csp9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chang AY (2017)	28636937	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2552044	2541052	2542144	277567	278620	SPBC409.12c	SPAC6F6.17	stn1	rif1	-	SPAPJ736.01|tap1|tap11	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Takikawa M (2017)	28180297	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	rif1 deletion in the stn1-1 mutant suppressed the high temperature sensitivity associated with stn1-1	-	BIOGRID
2552045	2541052	2542144	277567	278620	SPBC409.12c	SPAC6F6.17	stn1	rif1	-	SPAPJ736.01|tap1|tap11	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Takikawa M (2017)	28180297	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2552046	2541052	2541193	277567	277707	SPBC409.12c	SPBC776.02c	stn1	dis2	-	bws1|sds1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Takikawa M (2017)	28180297	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	dis2 or sds21 deletion in the stn1-1 mutant suppressed the high temperature sensitivity associated with stn1-1	-	BIOGRID
2552047	2541052	2539179	277567	275750	SPBC409.12c	SPCC31H12.05c	stn1	sds21	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Takikawa M (2017)	28180297	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	dis2 or sds21 deletion in the stn1-1 mutant suppressed the high temperature sensitivity associated with stn1-1	-	BIOGRID
2552049	2541052	2540927	277567	277443	SPBC409.12c	SPBC365.06	stn1	pmt3	-	smt3|ubl2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Takikawa M (2017)	28180297	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2552050	2539004	2540064	275578	276602	SPCC4G3.05c	SPBC1718.02	mus81	hop1	slx3	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Brown SD (2018)	29550859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	sporulation efficiency:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2552051	2540064	2543685	276602	280099	SPBC1718.02	SPAC3C7.03c	hop1	rad55	-	rhp55	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Brown SD (2018)	29550859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2552052	2540064	2539770	276602	276321	SPBC1718.02	SPBC1685.11	hop1	rlp1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Brown SD (2018)	29550859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2552053	2540064	2540584	276602	277110	SPBC1718.02	SPBC28F2.07	hop1	sfr1	-	dds20|mug13	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Brown SD (2018)	29550859	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mutation frequency:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2554174	3361562	2541047	280638	277562	SPAC11E3.03	SPBC409.09c	csm1	mis13	pcs1	cnl1	Protein-peptide	physical	Plowman R (2019)	31037469	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2554175	3361562	2541047	280638	277562	SPAC11E3.03	SPBC409.09c	csm1	mis13	pcs1	cnl1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Plowman R (2019)	31037469	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2560739	2542223	3361572	278696	280648	SPAC27D7.08c	SPSNRNA.06	SPAC27D7.08c	snu6	-	-	Protein-RNA	physical	Pendleton KE (2017)	28525753	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2560745	2538951	2540792	275525	277311	SPCC297.03	SPBC4F6.06	ssp1	kin1	-	-	PCA	physical	Lee ME (2018)	29249658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	BiFC	-	BIOGRID
2560966	2538951	2540792	275525	277311	SPCC297.03	SPBC4F6.06	ssp1	kin1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lee ME (2018)	29249658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2560988	2540792	2542632	277311	279086	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC24H6.05	kin1	cdc25	-	sal2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lee ME (2018)	29249658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	bipolar budding pattern	-	-	BIOGRID
2561128	2540792	2540792	277311	277311	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC4F6.06	kin1	kin1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lee ME (2018)	29249658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	auto-phosphorylation	-	BIOGRID
2561144	2540792	2539537	277311	276099	SPBC4F6.06	SPCP1E11.04c	kin1	pal1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lee ME (2018)	29249658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2561145	2540792	2539642	277311	276197	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC1706.01	kin1	tea4	-	wsh3	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lee ME (2018)	29249658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2561146	2540792	2540894	277311	277410	SPBC4F6.06	SPBC530.04	kin1	mod5	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lee ME (2018)	29249658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2561147	2540792	2539537	277311	276099	SPBC4F6.06	SPCP1E11.04c	kin1	pal1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Lee ME (2018)	29249658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2561148	2540792	2539537	277311	276099	SPBC4F6.06	SPCP1E11.04c	kin1	pal1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Lee ME (2018)	29249658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2561149	2540792	2539537	277311	276099	SPBC4F6.06	SPCP1E11.04c	kin1	pal1	-	-	PCA	physical	Lee ME (2018)	29249658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	BiFC	-	BIOGRID
2561150	2539642	2542635	276197	279089	SPBC1706.01	SPAC24H6.09	tea4	gef1	wsh3	-	PCA	physical	Lee ME (2018)	29249658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	BiFC	-	BIOGRID
2561151	2540792	2541889	277311	278379	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC2F7.03c	kin1	pom1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Lee ME (2018)	29249658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2561152	2541889	2540894	278379	277410	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC530.04	pom1	mod5	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lee ME (2018)	29249658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2561153	2541889	2539642	278379	276197	SPAC2F7.03c	SPBC1706.01	pom1	tea4	-	wsh3	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lee ME (2018)	29249658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2561154	2541889	2539537	278379	276099	SPAC2F7.03c	SPCP1E11.04c	pom1	pal1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lee ME (2018)	29249658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2561179	2541889	2541975	278379	278460	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC20G8.05c	pom1	cdc15	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lee ME (2018)	29249658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2561180	2541889	2542740	278379	279190	SPAC2F7.03c	SPAC9G1.06c	pom1	cyk3	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lee ME (2018)	29249658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2561181	2540792	2541975	277311	278460	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC20G8.05c	kin1	cdc15	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lee ME (2018)	29249658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2561182	2540792	2542740	277311	279190	SPBC4F6.06	SPAC9G1.06c	kin1	cyk3	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Lee ME (2018)	29249658	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2561213	2539357	2542277	275923	278746	SPCC126.14	SPAC17A5.02c	prp18	dbr1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Vijaykrishna N (2016)	27875300	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2561222	2539645	2539357	276200	275923	SPBC146.07	SPCC126.14	prp2	prp18	mis11|ods1|uaf1	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Vijaykrishna N (2016)	27875300	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2561697	2538706	2540348	275290	276877	SPCC338.08	SPBC29A10.05	ctp1	exo1	mug38|nip1|slr9	mut2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Jensen KL (2016)	27325741	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2561698	2540645	2539087	277170	275659	SPBC21B10.05c	SPCC1259.13	pop3	chk1	wat1	rad27	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ahamad N (2016)	27683273	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2561704	2542070	2539731	278547	276283	SPAC29B12.02c	SPBC1271.09	set2	SPBC1271.09	kmt3	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ard R (2016)	27613421	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	increased tgp1 expression contributes to the increased drug sensitivity observed in set2 cells	-	BIOGRID
2561705	2540720	2539206	277243	275776	SPBC216.07c	SPCC24B10.07	tor2	gad8	SPBC646.01c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Madrid M (2016)	27876895	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	double mutants show decreased levels of pck2 under stress conditions	-	BIOGRID
2561706	2539206	2539494	275776	276057	SPCC24B10.07	SPCC4G3.08	gad8	psk1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Madrid M (2016)	27876895	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue	defective levels of pck2 under stress conditions seen in a gad8 mutant are suppressed by a psk1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
2561707	2539206	2539494	275776	276057	SPCC24B10.07	SPCC4G3.08	gad8	psk1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Madrid M (2016)	27876895	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
2561708	2542231	2543529	278704	279947	SPAC19G12.14	SPAC4C5.02c	its3	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Madrid M (2016)	27876895	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2561709	2542231	2541149	278704	277664	SPAC19G12.14	SPBC651.03c	its3	gyp10	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Madrid M (2016)	27876895	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2561710	2540252	2541542	276784	278042	SPBC336.06c	SPAC4G9.02	rnh1	rnh201	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Ohle C (2016)	27881299	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
2561728	2542140	2540542	278616	277069	SPAC1783.07c	SPBC29A10.12	pap1	SPBC29A10.12	caf3	-	Co-localization	physical	Chen Y (2018)	30181192	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2561729	2540542	2541116	277069	277631	SPBC29A10.12	SPBC609.04	SPBC29A10.12	caf5	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chen Y (2018)	30181192	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	loss of caf5 can impair GFP-o1NES-mediated diamide tolerance	-	BIOGRID
2571961	2539620	2538763	276178	275346	SPBC1861.01c	SPCC970.12	cnp3	mis18	SPBC56F2.13	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Suma M (2018)	29925533	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	Cnp1 levels|Figure 7|cnp3-1 mis18-818	-	BIOGRID
2572571	2540627	2543222	277153	279650	SPBC25H2.13c	SPAC821.08c	cdc20	slp1	pol2	cdc20	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Kimata Y (2008)	18331722	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2572590	2539716	2540624	276269	277150	SPBC1289.01c	SPBC24C6.07	chr4	cdc14	SPBC1539.11c|cfh3	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sharifmoghadam MR (2009)	19237545	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	cfh3 cdc14-118 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
2572591	2539716	2540737	276269	277260	SPBC1289.01c	SPBC19G7.05c	chr4	bgs1	SPBC1539.11c|cfh3	cps1|drc1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Sharifmoghadam MR (2009)	19237545	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity|osmotic stress resistance|stress resistance	cfh3 cps1-191 double mutant	-	BIOGRID
2572592	2539716	2540737	276269	277260	SPBC1289.01c	SPBC19G7.05c	chr4	bgs1	SPBC1539.11c|cfh3	cps1|drc1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Sharifmoghadam MR (2009)	19237545	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	In the presence of glucan synthase inhibitors Caspofungin and Enfumafungin	-	BIOGRID
2572593	2540737	2539716	277260	276269	SPBC19G7.05c	SPBC1289.01c	bgs1	chr4	cps1|drc1	SPBC1539.11c|cfh3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sharifmoghadam MR (2009)	19237545	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2572594	2539716	2541612	276269	278109	SPBC1289.01c	SPAC1F7.04	chr4	rho1	SPBC1539.11c|cfh3	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sharifmoghadam MR (2009)	19237545	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573020	2539164	2538959	275735	275533	SPCC16A11.17	SPCC18B5.11c	mcm4	cds1	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bailis JM (2008)	18180284	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573021	2539164	2543580	275735	279995	SPCC16A11.17	SPAC644.14c	mcm4	rad51	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	rhp51	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bailis JM (2008)	18180284	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573022	2540620	2543580	277146	279995	SPBC4.04c	SPAC644.14c	mcm2	rad51	cdc19|nda1	rhp51	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bailis JM (2008)	18180284	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573023	2540620	2543086	277146	279519	SPBC4.04c	SPAC30D11.10	mcm2	rad52	cdc19|nda1	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bailis JM (2008)	18180284	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573024	2539164	2543580	275735	279995	SPCC16A11.17	SPAC644.14c	mcm4	rad51	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	rhp51	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bailis JM (2008)	18180284	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573025	2539164	2543086	275735	279519	SPCC16A11.17	SPAC30D11.10	mcm4	rad52	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Bailis JM (2008)	18180284	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573031	3361561	2540551	280637	277078	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC23E6.01c	swr1	cxr1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573032	3361561	2542461	280637	278922	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC19A8.13	swr1	usp101	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	snp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573033	3361561	2540865	280637	277382	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC4B4.07c	swr1	usp102	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	mud1|U1A	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573034	3361561	2541289	280637	277802	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBP35G2.09	swr1	usp103	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	yhc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573035	3361561	2543409	280637	279831	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC4D7.13	swr1	usp104	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	prp40	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573036	3361561	2540869	280637	277386	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC4B4.09	swr1	usp105	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	prp39	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573037	3361561	2539055	280637	275628	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC16A11.13	swr1	luc7	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	usp106	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573038	3361561	2541211	280637	277725	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC839.10	swr1	usp107	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	snu71	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573039	3361561	2541487	280637	277989	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC23D3.08	swr1	usp108	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573040	3361561	2540117	280637	276654	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC1289.12	swr1	usp109	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573041	3361561	2538832	280637	275413	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC962.06c	swr1	bpb1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	sf1|ods3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573042	3361561	2542482	280637	278942	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAP8A3.06	swr1	uaf2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPAP8A3.06|ods2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573043	3361561	2539645	280637	276200	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC146.07	swr1	prp2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573044	3361561	2541437	280637	277942	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC22A12.09c	swr1	sap114	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573045	3361561	2540932	280637	277448	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC36.09	swr1	sap61	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573046	3361561	2540622	280637	277148	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC21C3.05	swr1	sap62	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573047	3361561	2541619	280637	278116	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC27F1.09c	swr1	prp10	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	sap155|SF3b155	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573048	3361561	2543278	280637	279706	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAPJ698.03c	swr1	prp12	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	sap130|SF3b130	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573049	3361561	2541609	280637	278106	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC22F8.10c	swr1	sap145	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SF3b145	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573050	3361561	2542426	280637	278888	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC31G5.01	swr1	sap49	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPAPB1A11.05|SF3b49	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573051	3361561	2540462	280637	276990	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC29A3.07c	swr1	sap14	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	sab14|SF3b14a	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573052	3361561	2540636	280637	277162	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC211.05	swr1	sap10	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	sab10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573053	3361561	2541843	280637	278334	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC23H3.02c	swr1	ini1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573054	3361561	2539730	280637	276282	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC1861.08c	swr1	lea1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573055	3361561	2541219	280637	277733	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC8D2.09c	swr1	msl1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573056	3361561	2539783	280637	276333	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC1289.02c	swr1	uap2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573057	3361561	2539748	280637	276300	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC11C11.01	swr1	SPBC11C11.01	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPBC17D1.08	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573058	3361561	2538936	280637	275512	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC10H11.01	swr1	prp11	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	prp5	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573059	3361561	2542433	280637	278895	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC17G6.14c	swr1	uap56	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573060	3361561	2543676	280637	280090	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC9.03c	swr1	brr2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	spp41	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573061	3361561	2543611	280637	280025	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC3H5.04	swr1	aar2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573062	3361561	2541061	280637	277576	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC83.09c	swr1	lin1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPBC83.09c|snu40	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573063	3361561	2538728	280637	275312	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC63.11	swr1	prp28	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573064	3361561	2539984	280637	276528	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC1289.11	swr1	spf38	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	cwf17	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573065	3361561	2540711	280637	277234	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC215.12	swr1	cwf10	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	snu114|spef2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573066	3361561	2543413	280637	279835	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC4F8.12c	swr1	spp42	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	cwf6	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573067	3361561	2539369	280637	275935	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC16A11.05c	swr1	dim1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573068	3361561	2541185	280637	277699	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC6B1.07	swr1	prp1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	zer1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573069	3361561	2541686	280637	278182	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC29E6.02	swr1	prp3	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPAC30.06	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573070	3361561	2540045	280637	276583	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC119.13c	swr1	prp31	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573071	3361561	2542663	280637	279116	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC607.03c	swr1	snu13	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573072	3361561	2539312	280637	275879	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC777.14	swr1	prp4	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573073	3361561	2541477	280637	277979	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC227.12	swr1	rna4	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPAC227.12|prp4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573074	3361561	2540864	280637	277381	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC577.07	swr1	ubp10	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573075	3361561	2542774	280637	279223	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC167.03c	swr1	snu66	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573076	3361561	2539361	280637	275927	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC162.01c	swr1	SPCC162.01c	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573077	3361561	2540453	280637	276981	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC19C2.08	swr1	prp38	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573078	3361561	2541763	280637	278257	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC22F3.11c	swr1	snu23	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573079	3361561	2540389	280637	276917	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC31E1.03	swr1	hub1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	ubl4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573080	3361561	2538711	280637	275295	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC1281.02c	swr1	spf30	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573081	3361561	2540707	280637	277230	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC19C2.01	swr1	cdc28	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	prp8|SPBC21B10.01c|SPBC874.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573082	3361561	2540302	280637	276832	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC3B9.02c	swr1	cwf28	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573083	3361561	2542978	280637	279416	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC10F6.02c	swr1	prp22	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573084	3361561	2541168	280637	277683	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC6B1.10	swr1	prp17	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573085	3361561	2540006	280637	276550	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC1711.17	swr1	prp16	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPBC17G9.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573086	3361561	2540941	280637	277457	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC365.05c	swr1	slu7	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573087	3361561	2539357	280637	275923	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC126.14	swr1	prp18	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573088	3361561	2539268	280637	275838	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC10H11.02	swr1	cwf23	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPCP31B10.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573089	3361561	2539683	280637	276238	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC146.05c	swr1	cwf25	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573090	3361561	2542256	280637	278726	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC29A4.08c	swr1	prp19	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	cwf8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573091	3361561	2543583	280637	279998	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC644.12	swr1	cdc5	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573092	3361561	2540611	280637	277137	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC3E7.13c	swr1	syf2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573093	3361561	2540067	280637	276605	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC16H5.05c	swr1	cyp7	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	cwf27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573094	3361561	2540585	280637	277111	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC28F2.04c	swr1	cwf7	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	spf27	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573095	3361561	2540328	280637	276858	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC31F10.11c	swr1	cwf4	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	syf3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573096	3361561	2538988	280637	275562	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC188.11	swr1	prp45	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573097	3361561	2538974	280637	275548	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC550.02c	swr1	cwf5	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	ecm2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573098	3361561	3361260	280637	280336	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBP22H7.07	swr1	prp5	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	cwf1|pi024|SPACTOKYO_453.10	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573099	3361561	2542531	280637	278989	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC3A12.11c	swr1	cwf2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	prp3|cwc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573100	3361561	2540434	280637	276962	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC24C6.11	swr1	cwf14	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573101	3361561	2540983	280637	277499	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC337.06c	swr1	cwf15	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573102	3361561	2538901	280637	275479	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCP1E11.07c	swr1	cwf18	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573103	3361561	2543189	280637	279618	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC30D11.09	swr1	cwf19	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573104	3361561	2540801	280637	277320	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC18H10.10c	swr1	saf4	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	cwc16|cwf16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573105	3361561	2543616	280637	280030	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC4A8.09c	swr1	cwf21	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573106	3361561	2539941	280637	276485	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC13E7.01	swr1	cwf22	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPBC15D4.16	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573107	3361561	2540186	280637	276719	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC13E7.02	swr1	cwf24	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573108	3361561	2539503	280637	276066	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC4B3.14	swr1	cwf20	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573109	3361561	2540230	280637	276762	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC32F12.05c	swr1	cwf12	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	isy1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573110	3361561	2540753	280637	277274	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC211.02c	swr1	cwf3	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	syf1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573111	3361561	2541124	280637	277639	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC646.02	swr1	cwf11	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573112	3361561	2538931	280637	275507	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC1620.10	swr1	cwf26	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573113	3361561	2541212	280637	277726	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC887.05c	swr1	cwf29	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573114	3361561	2540057	280637	276595	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC16H5.10c	swr1	prp43	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573115	3361561	2539617	280637	276175	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC1861.04c	swr1	prp24	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPBC1861.04c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573116	3361561	2542910	280637	279353	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC1486.03c	swr1	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573117	3361561	2542263	280637	278732	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC17A2.08c	swr1	ntr2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPAC17A2.08c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573118	3361561	2539818	280637	276368	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC11C11.08	swr1	srp1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573119	3361561	2542772	280637	279221	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC16.02c	swr1	srp2	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573120	3361561	9407033	280637	1028396	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC222.18	swr1	SPAC222.18	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573121	3361561	2539459	280637	276022	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC825.05c	swr1	pwi1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPCC825.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573122	2539668	2541211	276223	277725	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC839.10	pht1	usp107	pi001	snu71	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573123	2539668	2540462	276223	276990	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC29A3.07c	pht1	sap14	pi001	sab14|SF3b14a	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573124	2539668	2539369	276223	275935	SPBC11B10.10c	SPCC16A11.05c	pht1	dim1	pi001	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573125	2539668	2540983	276223	277499	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC337.06c	pht1	cwf15	pi001	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573126	2539668	2542978	276223	279416	SPBC11B10.10c	SPAC10F6.02c	pht1	prp22	pi001	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573127	2539668	2540057	276223	276595	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC16H5.10c	pht1	prp43	pi001	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573128	3361561	2541211	280637	277725	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC839.10	swr1	usp107	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	snu71	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573129	3361561	2540462	280637	276990	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC29A3.07c	swr1	sap14	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	sab14|SF3b14a	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573130	3361561	2539369	280637	275935	SPAC11E3.01c	SPCC16A11.05c	swr1	dim1	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573131	3361561	2540983	280637	277499	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC337.06c	swr1	cwf15	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573132	3361561	2542978	280637	279416	SPAC11E3.01c	SPAC10F6.02c	swr1	prp22	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573133	3361561	2540057	280637	276595	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC16H5.10c	swr1	prp43	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573134	2539668	2541211	276223	277725	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC839.10	pht1	usp107	pi001	snu71	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	double-mutant has an exacerbated splicing defect	-	BIOGRID
2573137	2539668	2540006	276223	276550	SPBC11B10.10c	SPBC1711.17	pht1	prp16	pi001	SPBC17G9.01	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	suppressed cold sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
2573138	3361561	2540006	280637	276550	SPAC11E3.01c	SPBC1711.17	swr1	prp16	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	SPBC17G9.01	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nissen KE (2017)	28446597	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	suppressed heat sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
2573743	3361533	2542548	280609	279005	SPAC222.15	SPAC13A11.03	meu13	mcp7	SPAC821.01	mug32|mnd1	Co-purification	physical	Ploquin M (2007)	17426123	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573744	2542548	3361533	279005	280609	SPAC13A11.03	SPAC222.15	mcp7	meu13	mug32|mnd1	SPAC821.01	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Ploquin M (2007)	17426123	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2573745	2542548	3361533	279005	280609	SPAC13A11.03	SPAC222.15	mcp7	meu13	mug32|mnd1	SPAC821.01	Two-hybrid	physical	Ploquin M (2007)	17426123	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2574732	2540825	2538930	277343	275506	SPBC428.08c	SPCC188.13c	clr4	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kajitani T (2017)	29237752	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	Figure 4|dcr1+ overexpression rescues primary siRNA generation	-	BIOGRID
2574733	2540292	2538930	276823	275506	SPBC28F2.12	SPCC188.13c	rpb1	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kajitani T (2017)	29237752	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	Figure 4|ctdS7A mutant|dcr1+ overexpression rescues primary siRNA generation	-	BIOGRID
2574734	2539403	2538930	275968	275506	SPCC736.11	SPCC188.13c	ago1	dcr1	csp9	SPCC584.10c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kajitani T (2017)	29237752	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	Figure 4|dcr1+ overexpression rescues primary siRNA generation	-	BIOGRID
2574735	2542239	2538930	278711	275506	SPAC18G6.02c	SPCC188.13c	chp1	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Kajitani T (2017)	29237752	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	Figure 4|dcr1+ overexpression rescues primary siRNA generation	-	BIOGRID
2574736	2540292	2542239	276823	278711	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC18G6.02c	rpb1	chp1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kajitani T (2017)	29237752	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 6	-	BIOGRID
2574737	2540292	2539403	276823	275968	SPBC28F2.12	SPCC736.11	rpb1	ago1	-	csp9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kajitani T (2017)	29237752	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 6	-	BIOGRID
2574738	2542239	2540292	278711	276823	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC28F2.12	chp1	rpb1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kajitani T (2017)	29237752	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 6	-	BIOGRID
2574739	2542239	2539403	278711	275968	SPAC18G6.02c	SPCC736.11	chp1	ago1	-	csp9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Kajitani T (2017)	29237752	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 6	-	BIOGRID
2574740	2542414	2542244	278878	278714	SPAC6F6.16c	SPAC19G12.13c	tpz1	poz1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Xue J (2017)	29160296	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2574741	2540115	2542244	276652	278714	SPBC1778.02	SPAC19G12.13c	rap1	poz1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Xue J (2017)	29160296	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2574742	2542414	2542244	278878	278714	SPAC6F6.16c	SPAC19G12.13c	tpz1	poz1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Xue J (2017)	29160296	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2574743	2539352	2542244	275918	278714	SPCC188.07	SPAC19G12.13c	ccq1	poz1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Xue J (2017)	29160296	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	Figure 5|telomeres	-	BIOGRID
2574744	2539352	2542414	275918	278878	SPCC188.07	SPAC6F6.16c	ccq1	tpz1	-	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Xue J (2017)	29160296	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	Figure 5|telomeres	-	BIOGRID
2591944	2540398	2538689	276926	275274	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC1795.11	dis3	sum3	rrp44	ded1|moc2|slh3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591945	2540398	2538717	276926	275301	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC1235.02	dis3	bio2	rrp44	SPCC320.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591946	2540398	2538776	276926	275358	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC1494.06c	dis3	SPCC1494.06c	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591947	2540398	2538809	276926	275390	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC285.03	dis3	SPCC285.03	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591948	2540398	2538833	276926	275414	SPBC26H8.10	SPCP1E11.11	dis3	puf6	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591949	2540398	2538881	276926	275460	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC1620.14c	dis3	snf22	rrp44	SPCC830.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591950	2540398	2538893	276926	275471	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC18.14c	dis3	rpp0	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591951	2540398	2538897	276926	275475	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC1183.07	dis3	SPCC1183.07	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591952	2540398	2538902	276926	275480	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC13B11.01	dis3	adh1	rrp44	adh	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591953	2540398	2538926	276926	275502	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC306.07c	dis3	SPCC306.07c	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591954	2540398	2538941	276926	275516	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC1739.02c	dis3	mrpl22	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591955	2540398	2538943	276926	275518	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC1795.07	dis3	SPCC1795.07	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591956	2540398	2538947	276926	275521	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC1682.12c	dis3	ubp16	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591957	2540398	2538951	276926	275525	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC297.03	dis3	ssp1	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591958	2540398	2538997	276926	275571	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC330.09	dis3	enp2	rrp44	SPCC330.09	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591959	2540398	2539010	276926	275583	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC31H12.04c	dis3	rpl1202	rrp44	rpl12|rpl12-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591960	2540398	2539013	276926	275586	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC364.03	dis3	rpl1702	rrp44	rpl17|rpl17-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591961	2540398	2539035	276926	275608	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC794.09c	dis3	tef101	rrp44	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591962	2540398	2539056	276926	275629	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC126.11c	dis3	SPCC126.11c	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591963	2540398	2539067	276926	275639	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC576.08c	dis3	rps2	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591964	2540398	2539103	276926	275675	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC126.05c	dis3	mrpl17	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591965	2540398	2539105	276926	275677	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC1739.07	dis3	cti1	rrp44	lrp1|rrp47	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591966	2540398	2539106	276926	275678	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC757.08	dis3	rrp45	rrp44	SPCC757.08	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591967	2540398	2539158	276926	275730	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC18.12c	dis3	utp23	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591968	2540398	2539162	276926	275734	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC14G10.02	dis3	urb1	rrp44	SPCC14G10.02|SPCC18B5.13	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591969	2540398	2539164	276926	275735	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC16A11.17	dis3	mcm4	rrp44	SPCC24B10.01|cdc21	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591970	2540398	2539178	276926	275749	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC1682.14	dis3	rpl1902	rrp44	rpl19-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591971	2540398	2539180	276926	275751	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC16C4.09	dis3	sts5	rrp44	orb4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591972	2540398	2539186	276926	275757	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC16C4.13c	dis3	rpl1201	rrp44	rpl12-1|rpl12.1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591973	2540398	2539205	276926	275775	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC4B3.15	dis3	mid1	rrp44	dmf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591974	2540398	2539222	276926	275792	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC1183.08c	dis3	rpl101	rrp44	rpl1-1|rpl10a-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591975	2540398	2539225	276926	275795	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC1739.13	dis3	ssa2	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591976	2540398	2539263	276926	275833	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC895.09c	dis3	ucp12	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591977	2540398	2539286	276926	275854	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC1322.11	dis3	rpl2302	rrp44	rpl23-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591978	2540398	2539295	276926	275863	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC417.08	dis3	tef3	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591979	2540398	2539308	276926	275875	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC613.05c	dis3	rpl35	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591980	2540398	2539321	276926	275887	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC16C4.15	dis3	rml2	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591981	2540398	2539329	276926	275895	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC830.03	dis3	grc3	rrp44	SPCC830.03	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591982	2540398	2539331	276926	275897	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC24B10.09	dis3	rps1702	rrp44	rps17|rps17-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591983	2540398	2539336	276926	275902	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC74.05	dis3	rpl2702	rrp44	rpl27-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591984	2540398	2539337	276926	275903	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC16A11.02	dis3	utp13	rrp44	SPCC63.16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591985	2540398	2539338	276926	275904	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC338.07c	dis3	naa15	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591986	2540398	2539351	276926	275917	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC1840.11	dis3	csl4	rrp44	SPCC965.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591987	2540398	2539369	276926	275935	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC16A11.05c	dis3	dim1	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591988	2540398	2539372	276926	275938	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC622.18	dis3	rpl6	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591989	2540398	2539389	276926	275954	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC1827.05c	dis3	SPCC1827.05c	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591990	2540398	2539413	276926	275978	SPBC26H8.10	SPCP1E11.08	dis3	SPCP1E11.08	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591991	2540398	2539467	276926	276030	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC417.07c	dis3	mto1	rrp44	mbo1|mod20	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591992	2540398	2539497	276926	276060	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC895.07	dis3	alp14	rrp44	mtc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591993	2540398	2539501	276926	276064	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC4G3.14	dis3	mdj1	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591994	2540398	2539502	276926	276065	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC4G3.06c	dis3	mrpl4	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591995	2540398	2539505	276926	276068	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC736.14	dis3	dis1	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591996	2540398	2539518	276926	276080	SPBC26H8.10	SPCP31B10.08c	dis3	rpl35a	rrp44	rpl33	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591997	2540398	2539523	276926	276085	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC622.09	dis3	htb1	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591998	2540398	2539527	276926	276089	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC338.16	dis3	pof3	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2591999	2540398	2539540	276926	276102	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC736.12c	dis3	mmi1	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592000	2540398	2539544	276926	276105	SPBC26H8.10	SPCP31B10.07	dis3	eft202	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592001	2540398	2539548	276926	276109	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC5E4.07	dis3	rpl2802	rrp44	rpl28|rpl28-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592002	2540398	2539630	276926	276186	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC106.19	dis3	SPBC106.19	rrp44	SPBC582.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592003	2540398	2539643	276926	276198	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC1685.09	dis3	rps29	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592004	2540398	2539660	276926	276215	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC115.01c	dis3	rrp46	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592005	2540398	2539663	276926	276218	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC1289.07c	dis3	rpc40	rrp44	rpa42	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592006	2540398	2539678	276926	276233	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC11C11.07	dis3	rpl1801	rrp44	rpl18|rpl18-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592007	2540398	2539680	276926	276235	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC11C11.09c	dis3	rpl502	rrp44	rpl5-2|rpl5b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592008	2540398	2539687	276926	276242	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC1711.05	dis3	SPBC1711.05	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592009	2540398	2539701	276926	276254	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC106.18	dis3	rpl2501	rrp44	rpl25a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592010	2540398	2539736	276926	276288	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC12C2.12c	dis3	glo1	rrp44	SPBC21D10.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592011	2540398	2539764	276926	276315	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC14F5.04c	dis3	pgk1	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592012	2540398	2539780	276926	276330	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC1711.06	dis3	rpl401	rrp44	rpl4|rpl4-1|rpl4-2|rpl402	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592013	2540398	2539782	276926	276332	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC1815.01	dis3	eno101	rrp44	eno1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592014	2540398	2539797	276926	276347	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC16G5.14c	dis3	rps3	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592015	2540398	2539812	276926	276362	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC1347.02	dis3	fkbp39	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592016	2540398	2539834	276926	276383	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC14C8.14c	dis3	pol5	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592017	2540398	2539846	276926	276394	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC17G9.10	dis3	rpl1102	rrp44	rpl11-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592018	2540398	2539848	276926	276396	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC17G9.07	dis3	rps2402	rrp44	rps24-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592019	2540398	2539887	276926	276433	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC13G1.09	dis3	SPBC13G1.09	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592020	2540398	2539893	276926	276439	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC1539.10	dis3	nop16	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592021	2540398	2539913	276926	276457	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC11G11.03	dis3	mrt4	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592022	2540398	2539917	276926	276461	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC839.15c	dis3	tef103	rrp44	ef1a-c|ef1-b|efa13	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592023	2540398	2539938	276926	276482	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC17D11.05	dis3	tif32	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592024	2540398	2539950	276926	276494	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC1539.03c	dis3	SPBC1539.03c	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592025	2540398	2539962	276926	276506	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC11B10.04c	dis3	mrps28	rrp44	pi007|SPACTOKYO_453.29	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592026	2540398	2539968	276926	276512	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC16E9.10c	dis3	SPBC16E9.10c	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592027	2540398	2539986	276926	276530	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC14C8.16c	dis3	bot1	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592028	2540398	2539987	276926	276531	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC1604.06c	dis3	SPBC1604.06c	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592029	2540398	2539991	276926	276535	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC1105.12	dis3	hhf3	rrp44	h4.3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592030	2540398	2540016	276926	276560	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC1773.09c	dis3	mug184	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592031	2540398	2540088	276926	276626	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC16G5.04	dis3	mrpl23	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592032	2540398	2540097	276926	276635	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC11C11.03	dis3	ndc80	rrp44	ndc10|tid3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592033	2540398	2540116	276926	276653	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC16G5.10	dis3	rrp42	rrp44	SPBC16G5.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592034	2540398	2540135	276926	276672	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC16C6.11	dis3	rpl3201	rrp44	rpl32-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592035	2540398	2540180	276926	276713	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC16D10.11c	dis3	rps1801	rrp44	rps18-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592036	2540398	2540189	276926	276722	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC17D1.03c	dis3	rrp43	rrp44	SPBC17D1.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592037	2540398	2540199	276926	276732	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC1709.05	dis3	sks2	rrp44	hsc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592038	2540398	2540203	276926	276736	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC1604.09c	dis3	SPBC1604.09c	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592039	2540398	2540205	276926	276738	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC1271.13	dis3	mrpl8	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592040	2540398	2540213	276926	276746	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC17D1.06	dis3	dbp3	rrp44	SPCC17D1.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592041	2540398	2540215	276926	276748	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC83.14c	dis3	rfc5	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592042	2540398	2540218	276926	276751	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC32H8.04c	dis3	SPBC32H8.04c	rrp44	pi019|SPACTOKYO_453.16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592043	2540398	2540268	276926	276799	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC800.06	dis3	brx1	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592044	2540398	2540274	276926	276805	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC29B5.03c	dis3	rpl26	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592045	2540398	2540284	276926	276815	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC23E6.04c	dis3	utp10	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592046	2540398	2540291	276926	276822	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC337.12	dis3	red5	rrp44	SPBC337.12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592047	2540398	2540324	276926	276854	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC29A3.16	dis3	rrs1	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592048	2540398	2540346	276926	276875	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC2F12.03c	dis3	ebs1	rrp44	SPBC2F12.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592049	2540398	2540358	276926	276887	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC2F12.04	dis3	rpl1701	rrp44	rpl17|rpl17-1|SPCC2F12.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592050	2540398	2540366	276926	276895	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC2F12.07c	dis3	rpl802	rrp44	rpk37|rpk5b|rpl8-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592051	2540398	2540367	276926	276896	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC29A3.12	dis3	rps902	rrp44	rps9-2|rps9b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592052	2540398	2540390	276926	276918	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC31E1.06	dis3	bms1	rrp44	SPBC800.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592053	2540398	2540412	276926	276940	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC211.08c	dis3	mtr3	rrp44	SPBC211.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592054	2540398	2540426	276926	276954	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC23E6.07c	dis3	rfc1	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592055	2540398	2540437	276926	276965	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC25B2.07c	dis3	mmb1	rrp44	mug164	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592056	2540398	2540459	276926	276987	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC2F12.02c	dis3	mrpl7	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592057	2540398	2540467	276926	276995	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC2G2.07c	dis3	mug178	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592058	2540398	2540469	276926	276997	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC26H8.08c	dis3	grn1	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592059	2540398	2540477	276926	277005	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC30D10.12c	dis3	rsm27	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592060	2540398	2540479	276926	277007	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC2D10.10c	dis3	fib1	rrp44	fib|nop1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592061	2540398	2540491	276926	277019	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC28E12.04	dis3	SPBC28E12.04	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592062	2540398	2540514	276926	277042	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC19F5.02c	dis3	utp4	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592063	2540398	2540517	276926	277045	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC29A3.04	dis3	rpl8	rrp44	rpl701|rpl7a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592064	2540398	2540518	276926	277046	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC21H7.04	dis3	dbp7	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592065	2540398	2540529	276926	277057	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC29A3.06	dis3	SPBC29A3.06	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592066	2540398	2540544	276926	277071	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC25B2.05	dis3	mis3	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592067	2540398	2540547	276926	277074	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC32F12.11	dis3	tdh1	rrp44	gpd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592068	2540398	2540565	276926	277092	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC1D7.04	dis3	mlo3	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592069	2540398	2540598	276926	277124	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC24C6.02	dis3	SPBC24C6.02	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592070	2540398	2540617	276926	277143	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC21C3.20c	dis3	git1	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592071	2540398	2540659	276926	277184	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC19F5.05c	dis3	ppp1	rrp44	SPBC25D12.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592072	2540398	2540674	276926	277199	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC3F6.04c	dis3	nop14	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592073	2540398	2540705	276926	277228	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC20F10.01	dis3	gar1	rrp44	SPBC25H2.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592074	2540398	2540719	276926	277242	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC216.05	dis3	rad3	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592075	2540398	2540720	276926	277243	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC216.07c	dis3	tor2	rrp44	SPBC646.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592076	2540398	2540727	276926	277250	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC1921.03c	dis3	mex67	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592077	2540398	2540730	276926	277253	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC19C2.09	dis3	sre1	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592078	2540398	2540767	276926	277287	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC19C2.07	dis3	fba1	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592079	2540398	2540778	276926	277297	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC19G7.10c	dis3	SPBC19G7.10c	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592080	2540398	2540792	276926	277311	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC4F6.06	dis3	kin1	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592081	2540398	2540796	276926	277315	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC1A4.07c	dis3	sof1	rrp44	SPBC1A4.07c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592082	2540398	2540812	276926	277331	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC18H10.14	dis3	rps1601	rrp44	rps16-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592083	2540398	2540817	276926	277335	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC3H5.05c	dis3	rps1401	rrp44	rps14|rps14-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592084	2540398	2540841	276926	277358	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC18H10.12c	dis3	rpl701	rrp44	rpl7|rpl7-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592085	2540398	2540842	276926	277359	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC56F2.04	dis3	utp20	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592086	2540398	2540858	276926	277375	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC428.19c	dis3	utp15	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592087	2540398	2540870	276926	277387	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC56F2.02	dis3	rpl1901	rrp44	rpl19-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592088	2540398	2540874	276926	277391	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC4F6.07c	dis3	SPBC4F6.07c	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592089	2540398	2540910	276926	277426	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC577.02	dis3	rpl3801	rrp44	rpl38-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592090	2540398	2540924	276926	277440	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC365.04c	dis3	SPBC365.04c	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592091	2540398	2540965	276926	277481	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC3D6.15	dis3	rps2501	rrp44	rps25-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592092	2540398	2541040	276926	277555	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC3B9.14c	dis3	mrpl3	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592093	2540398	2541062	276926	277577	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC660.11	dis3	tcg1	rrp44	mug187	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592094	2540398	2541069	276926	277584	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC543.06c	dis3	dbp8	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592095	2540398	2541077	276926	277592	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC83.08	dis3	rvb2	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592096	2540398	2541081	276926	277596	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC691.02c	dis3	drp1	rrp44	SPBC691.02c|pi034|SPACTOKYO_453.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592097	2540398	2541087	276926	277602	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC646.10c	dis3	SPBC646.10c	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592098	2540398	2541126	276926	277641	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC651.01c	dis3	nog1	rrp44	SPBC725.18c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592099	2540398	2541130	276926	277645	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC776.11	dis3	rpl2801	rrp44	rpl28-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592100	2540398	2541136	276926	277651	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC691.04	dis3	SPBC691.04	rrp44	pi031|SPACTOKYO_453.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592101	2540398	2541155	276926	277670	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC6B1.04	dis3	mde4	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592102	2540398	2541156	276926	277671	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC685.07c	dis3	rpl2701	rrp44	rpl27-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592103	2540398	2541174	276926	277688	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC776.17	dis3	rrp7	rrp44	SPBC776.17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592104	2540398	2541176	276926	277690	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC776.08c	dis3	utp22	rrp44	SPBC776.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592105	2540398	2541182	276926	277696	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC713.04c	dis3	pwp2	rrp44	SPBC713.04c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592106	2540398	2541191	276926	277705	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC839.04	dis3	rpl803	rrp44	rpk5-b|rpkD4|rpl8-3|SPBC24E9.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592107	2540398	2541200	276926	277714	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC8D2.03c	dis3	hhf2	rrp44	ams3|h4.2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592108	2540398	2541229	276926	277743	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC839.05c	dis3	rps1701	rrp44	rps17-1|SPBC24E9.05c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592109	2540398	2541230	276926	277744	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC887.03c	dis3	noc3	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592110	2540398	2541232	276926	277746	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC887.07	dis3	mrpl38	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592111	2540398	2541242	276926	277756	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC8D2.05c	dis3	sfi1	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592112	2540398	2541265	276926	277779	SPBC26H8.10	SPBP16F5.03c	dis3	tra1	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592113	2540398	2541274	276926	277788	SPBC26H8.10	SPBP8B7.20c	dis3	nop2	rrp44	SPBP8B7.20c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592114	2540398	2541280	276926	277793	SPBC26H8.10	SPBP23A10.07	dis3	rpa2	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592115	2540398	2541281	276926	277794	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC902.04	dis3	rmn1	rrp44	SPBC902.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592116	2540398	2541290	276926	277803	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC9B6.06	dis3	mrpl10	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592117	2540398	2541303	276926	277815	SPBC26H8.10	SPBP22H7.02c	dis3	SPBP22H7.02c	rrp44	pi029|SPACTOKYO_453.05c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592118	2540398	2541344	276926	277855	SPBC26H8.10	SPBP8B7.03c	dis3	rpl402	rrp44	rpl4|rpl4-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592119	2540398	2541345	276926	277856	SPBC26H8.10	SPBP35G2.07	dis3	ilv1	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592120	2540398	2541348	276926	277859	SPBC26H8.10	SPBP4H10.15	dis3	SPBP4H10.15	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592121	2540398	2541349	276926	277860	SPBC26H8.10	SPBP35G2.08c	dis3	air1	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592122	2540398	2541354	276926	277865	SPBC26H8.10	SPBPB7E8.02	dis3	SPBPB7E8.02	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592123	2540398	2541361	276926	277872	SPBC26H8.10	SPBP8B7.10c	dis3	utp16	rrp44	SPBP8B7.10c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592124	2540398	2541369	276926	277880	SPBC26H8.10	SPBP4H10.13	dis3	rps2302	rrp44	rps23-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592125	2540398	2541383	276926	277894	SPBC26H8.10	SPBP8B7.16c	dis3	dbp2	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592126	2540398	2541418	276926	277924	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC22A12.07c	dis3	ogm1	rrp44	oma1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592127	2540398	2541429	276926	277934	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC2F7.15	dis3	rsm24	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592128	2540398	2541440	276926	277945	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC1565.05	dis3	utp8	rrp44	SPAC1565.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592129	2540398	2541476	276926	277978	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC2E1P5.05	dis3	rrp9	rrp44	SPAC2E1P5.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592130	2540398	2541493	276926	277995	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC27E2.10c	dis3	rfc3	rrp44	SPAPJ698.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592131	2540398	2541516	276926	278017	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC2G11.02	dis3	urb2	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592132	2540398	2541519	276926	278020	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC227.07c	dis3	pab1	rrp44	ret1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592133	2540398	2541565	276926	278063	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC1250.03	dis3	ubc14	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592134	2540398	2541569	276926	278066	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC24C9.10c	dis3	mrp4	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592135	2540398	2541570	276926	278067	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC6G9.09c	dis3	rpl2401	rrp44	rpl24|rpl24-01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592136	2540398	2541591	276926	278088	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC26A3.07c	dis3	rpl1101	rrp44	rpl11|rpl11-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592137	2540398	2541610	276926	278107	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC24C9.11	dis3	SPAC24C9.11	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592138	2540398	2541630	276926	278126	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC1093.05	dis3	SPAC1093.05	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592139	2540398	2541639	276926	278135	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC6F12.16c	dis3	mtr4	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592140	2540398	2541654	276926	278150	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC22G7.05	dis3	kri1	rrp44	SPAC22G7.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592141	2540398	2541655	276926	278151	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC7D4.14c	dis3	iss10	rrp44	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592142	2540398	2541668	276926	278164	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC1F7.02c	dis3	has1	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592143	2540398	2541679	276926	278175	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC2C4.11c	dis3	rbp28	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592144	2540398	2541680	276926	278176	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC22F8.09	dis3	rrp16	rrp44	nop53	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592145	2540398	2541705	276926	278200	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC30D11.12	dis3	rpl3802	rrp44	rpl38-2|rps38	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592146	2540398	2541706	276926	278201	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC16E8.15	dis3	tif45	rrp44	tif1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592147	2540398	2541715	276926	278210	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC110.01	dis3	ppk1	rrp44	SPAC140.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592148	2540398	2541737	276926	278231	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC22H12.04c	dis3	rps102	rrp44	rps1-2|rps3a-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592149	2540398	2541750	276926	278244	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC2G11.11c	dis3	prh1	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592150	2540398	2541783	276926	278276	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC11E3.11c	dis3	syt22	rrp44	SPAC11E3.11c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592151	2540398	2541786	276926	278278	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC22F3.08c	dis3	rok1	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592152	2540398	2541797	276926	278288	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC22F3.04	dis3	mug62	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592153	2540398	2541813	276926	278304	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC2F7.14c	dis3	rrp4	rrp44	SPAC2F7.14c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592154	2540398	2541814	276926	278305	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC23G3.06	dis3	SPAC23G3.06	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592155	2540398	2541837	276926	278328	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC22A12.12c	dis3	rrp40	rrp44	SPAC22A12.12c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592156	2540398	2541838	276926	278329	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC22A12.04c	dis3	rps2201	rrp44	rps15a-1|rps22-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592157	2540398	2541855	276926	278346	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC22E12.13c	dis3	rlp24	rrp44	rpl24-3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592158	2540398	2541874	276926	278364	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC1F8.07c	dis3	SPAC1F8.07c	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592159	2540398	2541908	276926	278398	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC23D3.02	dis3	rfc2	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592160	2540398	2541910	276926	278400	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC23C4.15	dis3	rpb5	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592161	2540398	2541914	276926	278404	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC2F3.03c	dis3	rpa49	rrp44	rpa51	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592162	2540398	2541919	276926	278409	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC227.02c	dis3	SPAC227.02c	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592163	2540398	2541932	276926	278420	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC212.11	dis3	tlh1	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592164	2540398	2541944	276926	278431	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC222.06	dis3	mak16	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592165	2540398	2541977	276926	278462	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC5D6.01	dis3	rps2202	rrp44	rps15a-2|rps22-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592166	2540398	2541984	276926	278469	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC23A1.10	dis3	tef102	rrp44	ef1a-b|ef1a-d|efa1|SPBC24E9.15c|tef1-b|tef1-d	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592167	2540398	2542006	276926	278489	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC23A1.11	dis3	rpl1602	rrp44	rpl16-2|rpl13a-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592168	2540398	2542012	276926	278495	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC23C11.02c	dis3	rps23	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592169	2540398	2542038	276926	278520	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC23C11.03	dis3	SPAC23C11.03	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592170	2540398	2542044	276926	278525	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC6G9.02c	dis3	nop9	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592171	2540398	2542093	276926	278570	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC26A3.04	dis3	rpl2002	rrp44	rpl20|rpl20-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592172	2540398	2542108	276926	278584	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC6F6.07c	dis3	rps13	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592173	2540398	2542119	276926	278595	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC1834.08	dis3	mak1	rrp44	phk3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592174	2540398	2542121	276926	278597	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC17H9.05	dis3	ebp2	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592175	2540398	2542138	276926	278614	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC589.10c	dis3	SPAC589.10c	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592176	2540398	2542139	276926	278615	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC18G6.07c	dis3	mra1	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592177	2540398	2542146	276926	278622	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC1B3.10c	dis3	SPAC1B3.10c	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592178	2540398	2542173	276926	278648	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC17H9.02	dis3	mtl1	rrp44	SPAC17H9.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592179	2540398	2542204	276926	278679	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC17A5.14	dis3	exo2	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592180	2540398	2542214	276926	278688	SPBC26H8.10	SPACUNK4.11c	dis3	mpp6	rrp44	SPACUNK4.11c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592181	2540398	2542217	276926	278691	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC1B3.13	dis3	nan1	rrp44	SPAC1B3.13	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592182	2540398	2542226	276926	278699	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC19G12.06c	dis3	hta2	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592183	2540398	2542265	276926	278734	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC17A5.03	dis3	rpl301	rrp44	rpl3|rpl3-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592184	2540398	2542290	276926	278758	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC17C9.03	dis3	tif471	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592185	2540398	2542314	276926	278780	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC16E8.06c	dis3	nop12	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592186	2540398	2542327	276926	278793	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC16C9.06c	dis3	upf1	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592187	2540398	2542358	276926	278823	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC1782.09c	dis3	clp1	rrp44	flp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592188	2540398	2542387	276926	278851	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC17H9.20	dis3	psc3	rrp44	SPAC607.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592189	2540398	2542425	276926	278887	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC1805.13	dis3	rpl14	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592190	2540398	2542446	276926	278907	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC19A8.07c	dis3	SPAC19A8.07c	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592191	2540398	2542463	276926	278924	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC1834.03c	dis3	hhf1	rrp44	h4.1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592192	2540398	2542481	276926	278941	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC29A4.04c	dis3	cbf5	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592193	2540398	2542508	276926	278966	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC607.02c	dis3	SPAC607.02c	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592194	2540398	2542514	276926	278972	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC19D5.05c	dis3	imp3	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592195	2540398	2542520	276926	278978	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC20G8.09c	dis3	nat10	rrp44	SPAC20G8.09c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592196	2540398	2542538	276926	278995	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC1805.11c	dis3	rps2602	rrp44	rps26-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592197	2540398	2542553	276926	279010	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC18G6.14c	dis3	rps7	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592198	2540398	2542610	276926	279064	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC1B9.03c	dis3	SPAC1B9.03c	rrp44	SPAC6B12.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592199	2540398	2542620	276926	279074	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC29A4.03c	dis3	SPAC29A4.03c	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592200	2540398	2542636	276926	279090	SPBC26H8.10	SPAP27G11.13c	dis3	nop10	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592201	2540398	2542663	276926	279116	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC607.03c	dis3	snu13	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592202	2540398	2542664	276926	279117	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC1071.10c	dis3	pma1	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592203	2540398	2542666	276926	279119	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC1142.04	dis3	SPAC1142.04	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592204	2540398	2542725	276926	279176	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC3A12.10	dis3	rpl2001	rrp44	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592205	2540398	2542736	276926	279186	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC25G10.02	dis3	cce1	rrp44	ydc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592206	2540398	2542782	276926	279231	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC1687.06c	dis3	rpl44	rrp44	rpl28	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592207	2540398	2542789	276926	279238	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC15E1.03	dis3	rpl42	rrp44	rpl36a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592208	2540398	2542790	276926	279239	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC1687.03c	dis3	rfc4	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592209	2540398	2542817	276926	279264	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC13G6.02c	dis3	rps101	rrp44	rps1-1|rps3a-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592210	2540398	2542827	276926	279274	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC1420.04c	dis3	cox1101	rrp44	SPAPB17E12.01c|cox11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592211	2540398	2542848	276926	279294	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC9G1.03c	dis3	rpl3001	rrp44	rpl30|rpl30-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592212	2540398	2542869	276926	279314	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC140.02	dis3	gar2	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592213	2540398	2542873	276926	279318	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC9G1.02	dis3	wis4	rrp44	wak1|wik1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592214	2540398	2542904	276926	279348	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC144.11	dis3	rps1102	rrp44	rps11|rps11-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592215	2540398	2542912	276926	279355	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC1071.07c	dis3	rps1502	rrp44	rps15|rps15-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592216	2540398	2542965	276926	279405	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC3G6.04	dis3	rnp24	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592217	2540398	2542979	276926	279417	SPBC26H8.10	SPAPJ760.02c	dis3	abp1	rrp44	app1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592218	2540398	2542995	276926	279433	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC105.01c	dis3	kha1	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592219	2540398	2543021	276926	279457	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC11E3.15	dis3	rpl22	rrp44	SPAP8A3.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592220	2540398	2543038	276926	279473	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC31A2.08	dis3	mrp20	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592221	2540398	2543120	276926	279552	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC31G5.03	dis3	rps1101	rrp44	rps11-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592222	2540398	2543125	276926	279557	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC343.02	dis3	img1	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592223	2540398	2543142	276926	279574	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC12G12.02	dis3	efg1	rrp44	SPAC12G12.02|SPAC630.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592224	2540398	2543197	276926	279626	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC31A2.07c	dis3	dbp10	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592225	2540398	2543250	276926	279678	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC3G9.15c	dis3	fcf2	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592226	2540398	2543254	276926	279682	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC1006.03c	dis3	red1	rrp44	iss3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592227	2540398	2543298	276926	279723	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC6B12.15	dis3	cpc2	rrp44	rkp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592228	2540398	2543344	276926	279766	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC56E4.04c	dis3	cut6	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592229	2540398	2543354	276926	279776	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC521.05	dis3	rps802	rrp44	rps8-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592230	2540398	2543371	276926	279793	SPBC26H8.10	SPAPB1A10.06c	dis3	SPAPB1A10.06c	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592231	2540398	2543382	276926	279804	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC890.02c	dis3	alp7	rrp44	mia1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592232	2540398	2543386	276926	279808	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC644.17c	dis3	mrpl9	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592233	2540398	2543388	276926	279810	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC20H4.01	dis3	utp5	rrp44	SPAC631.03	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592234	2540398	2543447	276926	279867	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC4F8.02c	dis3	mrpl40	rrp44	SPAC644.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592235	2540398	2543448	276926	279868	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC3H5.07	dis3	rpl702	rrp44	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592236	2540398	2543451	276926	279871	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC3G9.10c	dis3	rrp41	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592237	2540398	2543453	276926	279873	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC3G9.03	dis3	rpl2301	rrp44	rpl23-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592238	2540398	2543460	276926	279880	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC3H5.10	dis3	rpl3202	rrp44	rpl32|rpl32-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592239	2540398	2543475	276926	279895	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC890.08	dis3	rpl31	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592240	2540398	2543484	276926	279904	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC959.03c	dis3	SPAC959.03c	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592241	2540398	2543497	276926	279916	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC926.09c	dis3	fas1	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592242	2540398	2543503	276926	279921	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC4F8.04	dis3	SPAC4F8.04	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592243	2540398	2543540	276926	279957	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC664.08c	dis3	bfr2	rrp44	SPAC664.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592244	2540398	2543548	276926	279965	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC664.06	dis3	rlp7	rrp44	rpl7|rpl7-3|rpl703	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592245	2540398	2543553	276926	279970	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC664.05	dis3	rpl13	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592246	2540398	2543559	276926	279975	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC664.04c	dis3	rps1602	rrp44	rps16|rps16-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592247	2540398	2543588	276926	280003	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC4F8.05c	dis3	mrpl28	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592248	2540398	2543612	276926	280026	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC3H1.09c	dis3	avt3	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592249	2540398	2543618	276926	280032	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC4A8.11c	dis3	fas2	rrp44	lsd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592250	2540398	2543630	276926	280044	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC1F3.01	dis3	rrp6	rrp44	SPAC3H8.11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592251	2540398	2543635	276926	280049	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC3H8.03	dis3	img2	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592252	2540398	2543640	276926	280054	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC4F10.05c	dis3	SPAC4F10.05c	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592253	2540398	2543648	276926	280062	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC4F10.09c	dis3	SPAC4F10.09c	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592254	2540398	2543676	276926	280090	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC9.03c	dis3	brr2	rrp44	spp41	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592255	2540398	3361064	276926	280140	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC1259.01c	dis3	rps1802	rrp44	SPCC825.06c|rps18-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592256	2540398	3361295	276926	280371	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC1921.01c	dis3	rpl35b	rrp44	rpl37|rpl37-1|rpl3701|SPBC29C10.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592257	2540398	3361354	276926	280430	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC56F2.12	dis3	ilv5	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592258	2540398	3361377	276926	280453	SPBC26H8.10	SPAPB17E12.13	dis3	rpl1802	rrp44	rpl18-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592259	2540398	3361384	276926	280460	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC12G12.13c	dis3	cid14	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592260	2540398	3361483	276926	280559	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC513.01c	dis3	eft201	rrp44	SPAPYUK71.04c|eft2-1|etf2|eft2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592261	2540398	3361487	276926	280563	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC1805.17	dis3	crm1	rrp44	SPAC1B2.01|caf2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592262	2540398	3361520	276926	280596	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC1610.02c	dis3	SPAC1610.02c	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592263	2540398	5802781	276926	857919	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC18H10.13	dis3	rps1402	rrp44	rps14-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592264	2540398	5802952	276926	858090	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC1F7.13c	dis3	rpl801	rrp44	SPAC21E11.02c|rpk5a|rpl18|rpl2-1|rpl8-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592265	2540398	9407293	276926	1028656	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC1442.19	dis3	SPCC1442.19	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592266	2540398	14218123	276926	4254485	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC1486.11	dis3	fmc1	rrp44	new3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592267	2540398	2542134	276926	278610	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC18G6.06	dis3	SPAC18G6.06	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592268	2540398	2543208	276926	279637	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC328.04	dis3	SPAC328.04	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592269	2540398	2543574	276926	279989	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC4F10.06	dis3	SPAC4F10.06	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592270	2540398	2543504	276926	279922	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC4G9.17c	dis3	mrps5	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592271	2540398	2542351	276926	278816	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC57A7.06	dis3	SPAC57A7.06	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592272	2540398	2543500	276926	279918	SPBC26H8.10	SPAC926.08c	dis3	SPAC926.08c	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592273	2540398	2540036	276926	276578	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC1289.17	dis3	Tf2-11	rrp44	SPBC8E4.11c|tf2-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592274	2540398	2540873	276926	277390	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC4C3.05c	dis3	nuc1	rrp44	rpa1|rpa190	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592275	2540398	2540871	276926	277388	SPBC26H8.10	SPBC4F6.14	dis3	SPBC4F6.14	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592276	2540398	2539299	276926	275867	SPBC26H8.10	SPCC1672.07	dis3	SPCC1672.07	rrp44	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592279	2541813	2538829	278304	275410	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC306.09c	rrp4	cap1	SPAC2F7.14c	cap	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592280	2541813	2538833	278304	275414	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCP1E11.11	rrp4	puf6	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592281	2541813	2538892	278304	275470	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC1393.03	rrp4	rps1501	SPAC2F7.14c	rps15-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592282	2541813	2538893	278304	275471	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC18.14c	rrp4	rpp0	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592283	2541813	2538902	278304	275480	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC13B11.01	rrp4	adh1	SPAC2F7.14c	adh	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592284	2541813	2538947	278304	275521	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC1682.12c	rrp4	ubp16	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592285	2541813	2538951	278304	275525	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC297.03	rrp4	ssp1	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592286	2541813	2538997	278304	275571	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC330.09	rrp4	enp2	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC330.09	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592287	2541813	2539010	278304	275583	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC31H12.04c	rrp4	rpl1202	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl12|rpl12-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592288	2541813	2539013	278304	275586	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC364.03	rrp4	rpl1702	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl17|rpl17-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592289	2541813	2539035	278304	275608	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC794.09c	rrp4	tef101	SPAC2F7.14c	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592290	2541813	2539056	278304	275629	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC126.11c	rrp4	SPCC126.11c	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592291	2541813	2539067	278304	275639	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC576.08c	rrp4	rps2	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592292	2541813	2539103	278304	275675	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC126.05c	rrp4	mrpl17	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592293	2541813	2539105	278304	275677	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC1739.07	rrp4	cti1	SPAC2F7.14c	lrp1|rrp47	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592294	2541813	2539106	278304	275678	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC757.08	rrp4	rrp45	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC757.08	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592295	2541813	2539139	278304	275711	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC1919.08c	rrp4	mrpl33	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592296	2541813	2539186	278304	275757	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC16C4.13c	rrp4	rpl1201	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl12-1|rpl12.1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592297	2541813	2539205	278304	275775	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC4B3.15	rrp4	mid1	SPAC2F7.14c	dmf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592298	2541813	2539225	278304	275795	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC1739.13	rrp4	ssa2	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592299	2541813	2539278	278304	275846	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC1223.07c	rrp4	drs1	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592300	2541813	2539286	278304	275854	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC1322.11	rrp4	rpl2302	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl23-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592301	2541813	2539308	278304	275875	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC613.05c	rrp4	rpl35	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592302	2541813	2539321	278304	275887	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC16C4.15	rrp4	rml2	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592303	2541813	2539331	278304	275897	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC24B10.09	rrp4	rps1702	SPAC2F7.14c	rps17|rps17-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592304	2541813	2539336	278304	275902	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC74.05	rrp4	rpl2702	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl27-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592305	2541813	2539351	278304	275917	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC1840.11	rrp4	csl4	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC965.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592306	2541813	2539358	278304	275924	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC16C4.07	rrp4	scw1	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592307	2541813	2539369	278304	275935	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC16A11.05c	rrp4	dim1	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592308	2541813	2539372	278304	275938	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC622.18	rrp4	rpl6	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592309	2541813	2539497	278304	276060	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC895.07	rrp4	alp14	SPAC2F7.14c	mtc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592310	2541813	2539518	278304	276080	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCP31B10.08c	rrp4	rpl35a	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl33	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592311	2541813	2539523	278304	276085	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC622.09	rrp4	htb1	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592312	2541813	2539540	278304	276102	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC736.12c	rrp4	mmi1	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592313	2541813	2539544	278304	276105	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCP31B10.07	rrp4	eft202	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592314	2541813	2539548	278304	276109	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC5E4.07	rrp4	rpl2802	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl28|rpl28-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592315	2541813	2539643	278304	276198	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC1685.09	rrp4	rps29	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592316	2541813	2539660	278304	276215	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC115.01c	rrp4	rrp46	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592317	2541813	2539678	278304	276233	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC11C11.07	rrp4	rpl1801	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl18|rpl18-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592318	2541813	2539680	278304	276235	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC11C11.09c	rrp4	rpl502	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl5-2|rpl5b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592319	2541813	2539687	278304	276242	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC1711.05	rrp4	SPBC1711.05	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592320	2541813	2539694	278304	276248	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC1709.08	rrp4	cft1	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592321	2541813	2539701	278304	276254	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC106.18	rrp4	rpl2501	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl25a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592322	2541813	2539736	278304	276288	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC12C2.12c	rrp4	glo1	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC21D10.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592323	2541813	2539780	278304	276330	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC1711.06	rrp4	rpl401	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl4|rpl4-1|rpl4-2|rpl402	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592324	2541813	2539797	278304	276347	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC16G5.14c	rrp4	rps3	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592325	2541813	2539812	278304	276362	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC1347.02	rrp4	fkbp39	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592326	2541813	2539846	278304	276394	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC17G9.10	rrp4	rpl1102	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl11-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592327	2541813	2539848	278304	276396	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC17G9.07	rrp4	rps2402	SPAC2F7.14c	rps24-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592328	2541813	2539887	278304	276433	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC13G1.09	rrp4	SPBC13G1.09	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592329	2541813	2539917	278304	276461	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC839.15c	rrp4	tef103	SPAC2F7.14c	ef1a-c|ef1-b|efa13	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592330	2541813	2539962	278304	276506	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC11B10.04c	rrp4	mrps28	SPAC2F7.14c	pi007|SPACTOKYO_453.29	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592331	2541813	2539968	278304	276512	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC16E9.10c	rrp4	SPBC16E9.10c	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592332	2541813	2539985	278304	276529	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC14F5.09c	rrp4	ade8	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592333	2541813	2539986	278304	276530	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC14C8.16c	rrp4	bot1	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592334	2541813	2539987	278304	276531	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC1604.06c	rrp4	SPBC1604.06c	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592335	2541813	2539991	278304	276535	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC1105.12	rrp4	hhf3	SPAC2F7.14c	h4.3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592336	2541813	2540097	278304	276635	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC11C11.03	rrp4	ndc80	SPAC2F7.14c	ndc10|tid3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592337	2541813	2540116	278304	276653	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC16G5.10	rrp4	rrp42	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC16G5.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592338	2541813	2540180	278304	276713	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC16D10.11c	rrp4	rps1801	SPAC2F7.14c	rps18-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592339	2541813	2540185	278304	276718	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC13E7.04	rrp4	atp16	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592340	2541813	2540189	278304	276722	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC17D1.03c	rrp4	rrp43	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC17D1.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592341	2541813	2540199	278304	276732	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC1709.05	rrp4	sks2	SPAC2F7.14c	hsc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592342	2541813	2540227	278304	276759	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC31F10.14c	rrp4	hip3	SPAC2F7.14c	hir3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592343	2541813	2540243	278304	276775	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC32H8.13c	rrp4	mok12	SPAC2F7.14c	SPACTOKYO_453.25c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592344	2541813	2540268	278304	276799	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC800.06	rrp4	brx1	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592345	2541813	2540274	278304	276805	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC29B5.03c	rrp4	rpl26	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592346	2541813	2540284	278304	276815	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC23E6.04c	rrp4	utp10	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592347	2541813	2540291	278304	276822	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC337.12	rrp4	red5	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC337.12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592348	2541813	2540292	278304	276823	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC28F2.12	rrp4	rpb1	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592349	2541813	2540324	278304	276854	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC29A3.16	rrp4	rrs1	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592350	2541813	2540358	278304	276887	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC2F12.04	rrp4	rpl1701	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl17|rpl17-1|SPCC2F12.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592351	2541813	2540366	278304	276895	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC2F12.07c	rrp4	rpl802	SPAC2F7.14c	rpk37|rpk5b|rpl8-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592352	2541813	2540390	278304	276918	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC31E1.06	rrp4	bms1	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC800.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592353	2541813	2540398	278304	276926	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC26H8.10	rrp4	dis3	SPAC2F7.14c	rrp44	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592354	2541813	2540412	278304	276940	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC211.08c	rrp4	mtr3	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC211.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592355	2541813	2540426	278304	276954	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC23E6.07c	rrp4	rfc1	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592356	2541813	2540459	278304	276987	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC2F12.02c	rrp4	mrpl7	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592357	2541813	2540469	278304	276997	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC26H8.08c	rrp4	grn1	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592358	2541813	2540479	278304	277007	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC2D10.10c	rrp4	fib1	SPAC2F7.14c	fib|nop1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592359	2541813	2540495	278304	277023	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC27B12.04c	rrp4	far11	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC27B12.04c|csc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592360	2541813	2540517	278304	277045	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC29A3.04	rrp4	rpl8	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl701|rpl7a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592361	2541813	2540518	278304	277046	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC21H7.04	rrp4	dbp7	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592362	2541813	2540529	278304	277057	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC29A3.06	rrp4	SPBC29A3.06	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592363	2541813	2540544	278304	277071	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC25B2.05	rrp4	mis3	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592364	2541813	2540547	278304	277074	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC32F12.11	rrp4	tdh1	SPAC2F7.14c	gpd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592365	2541813	2540565	278304	277092	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC1D7.04	rrp4	mlo3	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592366	2541813	2540601	278304	277127	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC29A3.14c	rrp4	trt1	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592367	2541813	2540609	278304	277135	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC19G7.03c	rrp4	rps3002	SPAC2F7.14c	rps30|rps30-2|ysprs30	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592368	2541813	2540659	278304	277184	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC19F5.05c	rrp4	ppp1	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC25D12.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592369	2541813	2540674	278304	277199	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC3F6.04c	rrp4	nop14	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592370	2541813	2540677	278304	277202	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC21B10.03c	rrp4	ath1	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC21B10.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592371	2541813	2540682	278304	277207	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC800.04c	rrp4	rpl4301	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl37a-1|rpl43|rpl43-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592372	2541813	2540691	278304	277216	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC20F10.05	rrp4	nrl1	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592373	2541813	2540707	278304	277230	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC19C2.01	rrp4	cdc28	SPAC2F7.14c	prp8|SPBC21B10.01c|SPBC874.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592374	2541813	2540778	278304	277297	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC19G7.10c	rrp4	SPBC19G7.10c	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592375	2541813	2540792	278304	277311	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC4F6.06	rrp4	kin1	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592376	2541813	2540796	278304	277315	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC1A4.07c	rrp4	sof1	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC1A4.07c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592377	2541813	2540812	278304	277331	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC18H10.14	rrp4	rps1601	SPAC2F7.14c	rps16-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592378	2541813	2540817	278304	277335	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC3H5.05c	rrp4	rps1401	SPAC2F7.14c	rps14|rps14-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592379	2541813	2540841	278304	277358	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC18H10.12c	rrp4	rpl701	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl7|rpl7-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592380	2541813	2540842	278304	277359	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC56F2.04	rrp4	utp20	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592381	2541813	2540851	278304	277368	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC4F6.04	rrp4	rpl2502	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl23a-2|rpl25b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592382	2541813	2540858	278304	277375	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC428.19c	rrp4	utp15	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592383	2541813	2540870	278304	277387	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC56F2.02	rrp4	rpl1901	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl19-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592384	2541813	2540871	278304	277388	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC4F6.14	rrp4	SPBC4F6.14	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592385	2541813	2540910	278304	277426	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC577.02	rrp4	rpl3801	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl38-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592386	2541813	2541007	278304	277522	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC3H7.08c	rrp4	SPBC3H7.08c	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592387	2541813	2541126	278304	277641	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC651.01c	rrp4	nog1	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC725.18c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592388	2541813	2541130	278304	277645	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC776.11	rrp4	rpl2801	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl28-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592389	2541813	2541156	278304	277671	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC685.07c	rrp4	rpl2701	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl27-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592390	2541813	2541172	278304	277686	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC776.01	rrp4	rpl29	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592391	2541813	2541174	278304	277688	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC776.17	rrp4	rrp7	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC776.17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592392	2541813	2541175	278304	277689	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC839.13c	rrp4	rpl1601	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl13a-1|rpl16-1|SPBC24E9.13c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592393	2541813	2541176	278304	277690	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC776.08c	rrp4	utp22	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC776.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592394	2541813	2541191	278304	277705	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC839.04	rrp4	rpl803	SPAC2F7.14c	rpk5-b|rpkD4|rpl8-3|SPBC24E9.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592395	2541813	2541200	278304	277714	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC8D2.03c	rrp4	hhf2	SPAC2F7.14c	ams3|h4.2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592396	2541813	2541213	278304	277727	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC887.14c	rrp4	pfh1	SPAC2F7.14c	pif1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592397	2541813	2541242	278304	277756	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC8D2.05c	rrp4	sfi1	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592398	2541813	2541265	278304	277779	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBP16F5.03c	rrp4	tra1	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592399	2541813	2541274	278304	277788	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBP8B7.20c	rrp4	nop2	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBP8B7.20c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592400	2541813	2541280	278304	277793	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBP23A10.07	rrp4	rpa2	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592401	2541813	2541281	278304	277794	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC902.04	rrp4	rmn1	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC902.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592402	2541813	2541288	278304	277801	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBP35G2.04c	rrp4	SPBP35G2.04c	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592403	2541813	2541344	278304	277855	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBP8B7.03c	rrp4	rpl402	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl4|rpl4-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592404	2541813	2541345	278304	277856	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBP35G2.07	rrp4	ilv1	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592405	2541813	2541348	278304	277859	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBP4H10.15	rrp4	SPBP4H10.15	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592406	2541813	2541349	278304	277860	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBP35G2.08c	rrp4	air1	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592407	2541813	2541354	278304	277865	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBPB7E8.02	rrp4	SPBPB7E8.02	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592408	2541813	2541361	278304	277872	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBP8B7.10c	rrp4	utp16	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBP8B7.10c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592409	2541813	2541363	278304	277874	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBPJ4664.02	rrp4	SPBPJ4664.02	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592410	2541813	2541369	278304	277880	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBP4H10.13	rrp4	rps2302	SPAC2F7.14c	rps23-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592411	2541813	2541383	278304	277894	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBP8B7.16c	rrp4	dbp2	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592412	2541813	2541429	278304	277934	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC2F7.15	rrp4	rsm24	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592413	2541813	2541451	278304	277956	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC23G3.02c	rrp4	sib1	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592414	2541813	2541476	278304	277978	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC2E1P5.05	rrp4	rrp9	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC2E1P5.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592415	2541813	2541519	278304	278020	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC227.07c	rrp4	pab1	SPAC2F7.14c	ret1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592416	2541813	2541560	278304	278059	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC24B11.12c	rrp4	SPAC24B11.12c	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592417	2541813	2541569	278304	278066	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC24C9.10c	rrp4	mrp4	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592418	2541813	2541570	278304	278067	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC6G9.09c	rrp4	rpl2401	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl24|rpl24-01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592419	2541813	2541591	278304	278088	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC26A3.07c	rrp4	rpl1101	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl11|rpl11-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592420	2541813	2541639	278304	278135	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC6F12.16c	rrp4	mtr4	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592421	2541813	2541654	278304	278150	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC22G7.05	rrp4	kri1	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC22G7.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592422	2541813	2541655	278304	278151	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC7D4.14c	rrp4	iss10	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592423	2541813	2541668	278304	278164	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC1F7.02c	rrp4	has1	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592424	2541813	2541679	278304	278175	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC2C4.11c	rrp4	rbp28	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592425	2541813	2541680	278304	278176	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC22F8.09	rrp4	rrp16	SPAC2F7.14c	nop53	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592426	2541813	2541737	278304	278231	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC22H12.04c	rrp4	rps102	SPAC2F7.14c	rps1-2|rps3a-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592427	2541813	2541750	278304	278244	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC2G11.11c	rrp4	prh1	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592428	2541813	2541783	278304	278276	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC11E3.11c	rrp4	syt22	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC11E3.11c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592429	2541813	2541786	278304	278278	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC22F3.08c	rrp4	rok1	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592430	2541813	2541837	278304	278328	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC22A12.12c	rrp4	rrp40	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC22A12.12c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592431	2541813	2541838	278304	278329	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC22A12.04c	rrp4	rps2201	SPAC2F7.14c	rps15a-1|rps22-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592432	2541813	2541910	278304	278400	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC23C4.15	rrp4	rpb5	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592433	2541813	2541914	278304	278404	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC2F3.03c	rrp4	rpa49	SPAC2F7.14c	rpa51	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592434	2541813	2541932	278304	278420	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC212.11	rrp4	tlh1	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592435	2541813	2541977	278304	278462	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC5D6.01	rrp4	rps2202	SPAC2F7.14c	rps15a-2|rps22-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592436	2541813	2541984	278304	278469	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC23A1.10	rrp4	tef102	SPAC2F7.14c	ef1a-b|ef1a-d|efa1|SPBC24E9.15c|tef1-b|tef1-d	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592437	2541813	2541989	278304	278473	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC23A1.08c	rrp4	rpl3401	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl34|rpl34-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592438	2541813	2542006	278304	278489	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC23A1.11	rrp4	rpl1602	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl16-2|rpl13a-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592439	2541813	2542012	278304	278495	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC23C11.02c	rrp4	rps23	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592440	2541813	2542044	278304	278525	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC6G9.02c	rrp4	nop9	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592441	2541813	2542090	278304	278567	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC25G10.08	rrp4	SPAC25G10.08	SPAC2F7.14c	p116	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592442	2541813	2542093	278304	278570	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC26A3.04	rrp4	rpl2002	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl20|rpl20-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592443	2541813	2542108	278304	278584	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC6F6.07c	rrp4	rps13	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592444	2541813	2542139	278304	278615	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC18G6.07c	rrp4	mra1	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592445	2541813	2542173	278304	278648	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC17H9.02	rrp4	mtl1	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC17H9.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592446	2541813	2542214	278304	278688	SPAC2F7.14c	SPACUNK4.11c	rrp4	mpp6	SPAC2F7.14c	SPACUNK4.11c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592447	2541813	2542226	278304	278699	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC19G12.06c	rrp4	hta2	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592448	2541813	2542265	278304	278734	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC17A5.03	rrp4	rpl301	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl3|rpl3-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592449	2541813	2542290	278304	278758	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC17C9.03	rrp4	tif471	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592450	2541813	2542314	278304	278780	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC16E8.06c	rrp4	nop12	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592451	2541813	2542351	278304	278816	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC57A7.06	rrp4	SPAC57A7.06	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592452	2541813	2542358	278304	278823	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC1782.09c	rrp4	clp1	SPAC2F7.14c	flp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592453	2541813	2542425	278304	278887	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC1805.13	rrp4	rpl14	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592454	2541813	2542463	278304	278924	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC1834.03c	rrp4	hhf1	SPAC2F7.14c	h4.1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592455	2541813	2542481	278304	278941	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC29A4.04c	rrp4	cbf5	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592456	2541813	2542520	278304	278978	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC20G8.09c	rrp4	nat10	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC20G8.09c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592457	2541813	2542553	278304	279010	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC18G6.14c	rrp4	rps7	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592458	2541813	2542599	278304	279053	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC13A11.02c	rrp4	erg11	SPAC2F7.14c	cyp51	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592459	2541813	2542603	278304	279057	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC19B12.04	rrp4	rps3001	SPAC2F7.14c	rps30-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592460	2541813	2542635	278304	279089	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC24H6.09	rrp4	gef1	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592461	2541813	2542636	278304	279090	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAP27G11.13c	rrp4	nop10	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592462	2541813	2542664	278304	279117	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC1071.10c	rrp4	pma1	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592463	2541813	2542701	278304	279154	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC26H5.05	rrp4	mga2	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC26H5.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592464	2541813	2542725	278304	279176	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC3A12.10	rrp4	rpl2001	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592465	2541813	2542793	278304	279241	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC6F6.06c	rrp4	rax2	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592466	2541813	2542817	278304	279264	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC13G6.02c	rrp4	rps101	SPAC2F7.14c	rps1-1|rps3a-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592467	2541813	2542827	278304	279274	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC1420.04c	rrp4	cox1101	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAPB17E12.01c|cox11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592468	2541813	2542848	278304	279294	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC9G1.03c	rrp4	rpl3001	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl30|rpl30-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592469	2541813	2542869	278304	279314	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC140.02	rrp4	gar2	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592470	2541813	2542904	278304	279348	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC144.11	rrp4	rps1102	SPAC2F7.14c	rps11|rps11-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592471	2541813	2542912	278304	279355	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC1071.07c	rrp4	rps1502	SPAC2F7.14c	rps15|rps15-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592472	2541813	2542936	278304	279377	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC12G12.06c	rrp4	SPAC12G12.06c	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592473	2541813	2543021	278304	279457	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC11E3.15	rrp4	rpl22	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAP8A3.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592474	2541813	2543038	278304	279473	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC31A2.08	rrp4	mrp20	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592475	2541813	2543085	278304	279518	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC806.03c	rrp4	rps2601	SPAC2F7.14c	rps26|rps26-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592476	2541813	2543120	278304	279552	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC31G5.03	rrp4	rps1101	SPAC2F7.14c	rps11-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592477	2541813	2543125	278304	279557	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC343.02	rrp4	img1	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592478	2541813	2543142	278304	279574	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC12G12.02	rrp4	efg1	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC12G12.02|SPAC630.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592479	2541813	2543178	278304	279608	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC31G5.15	rrp4	psd3	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592480	2541813	2543197	278304	279626	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC31A2.07c	rrp4	dbp10	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592481	2541813	2543250	278304	279678	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC3G9.15c	rrp4	fcf2	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592482	2541813	2543254	278304	279682	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC1006.03c	rrp4	red1	SPAC2F7.14c	iss3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592483	2541813	2543344	278304	279766	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC56E4.04c	rrp4	cut6	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592484	2541813	2543354	278304	279776	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC521.05	rrp4	rps802	SPAC2F7.14c	rps8-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592485	2541813	2543386	278304	279808	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC644.17c	rrp4	mrpl9	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592486	2541813	2543448	278304	279868	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC3H5.07	rrp4	rpl702	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl7|rpl7-2|rpl7b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592487	2541813	2543451	278304	279871	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC3G9.10c	rrp4	rrp41	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592488	2541813	2543453	278304	279873	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC3G9.03	rrp4	rpl2301	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl23-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592489	2541813	2543455	278304	279875	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC3G9.09c	rrp4	tif211	SPAC2F7.14c	eIF2alpha	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592490	2541813	2543475	278304	279895	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC890.08	rrp4	rpl31	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592491	2541813	2543497	278304	279916	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC926.09c	rrp4	fas1	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592492	2541813	2543529	278304	279947	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC4C5.02c	rrp4	ryh1	SPAC2F7.14c	hos1|sat7	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592493	2541813	2543540	278304	279957	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC664.08c	rrp4	bfr2	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC664.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592494	2541813	2543548	278304	279965	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC664.06	rrp4	rlp7	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl7|rpl7-3|rpl703	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592495	2541813	2543553	278304	279970	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC664.05	rrp4	rpl13	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592496	2541813	2543559	278304	279975	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC664.04c	rrp4	rps1602	SPAC2F7.14c	rps16|rps16-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592497	2541813	2543588	278304	280003	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC4F8.05c	rrp4	mrpl28	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592498	2541813	2543618	278304	280032	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC4A8.11c	rrp4	fas2	SPAC2F7.14c	lsd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592499	2541813	2543630	278304	280044	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC1F3.01	rrp4	rrp6	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC3H8.11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592500	2541813	2543640	278304	280054	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC4F10.05c	rrp4	SPAC4F10.05c	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592501	2541813	2543648	278304	280062	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC4F10.09c	rrp4	SPAC4F10.09c	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592502	2541813	3361064	278304	280140	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC1259.01c	rrp4	rps1802	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC825.06c|rps18-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592503	2541813	3361260	278304	280336	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBP22H7.07	rrp4	prp5	SPAC2F7.14c	cwf1|pi024|SPACTOKYO_453.10	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592504	2541813	3361295	278304	280371	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC1921.01c	rrp4	rpl35b	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl37|rpl37-1|rpl3701|SPBC29C10.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592505	2541813	3361377	278304	280453	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAPB17E12.13	rrp4	rpl1802	SPAC2F7.14c	rpl18-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592506	2541813	3361384	278304	280460	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC12G12.13c	rrp4	cid14	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592507	2541813	3361483	278304	280559	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC513.01c	rrp4	eft201	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAPYUK71.04c|eft2-1|etf2|eft2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592508	2541813	5802781	278304	857919	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC18H10.13	rrp4	rps1402	SPAC2F7.14c	rps14-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592509	2541813	5802952	278304	858090	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC1F7.13c	rrp4	rpl801	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC21E11.02c|rpk5a|rpl18|rpl2-1|rpl8-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592510	2541813	14217735	278304	4254097	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC1105.19	rrp4	tam12	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592511	2541813	2538689	278304	275274	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC1795.11	rrp4	sum3	SPAC2F7.14c	ded1|moc2|slh3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592512	2541813	2538776	278304	275358	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC1494.06c	rrp4	SPCC1494.06c	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592513	2541813	2538897	278304	275475	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC1183.07	rrp4	SPCC1183.07	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592514	2541813	2539467	278304	276030	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC417.07c	rrp4	mto1	SPAC2F7.14c	mbo1|mod20	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592515	2541813	2540138	278304	276675	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC16C6.02c	rrp4	vps1302	SPAC2F7.14c	vps13b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592516	2541813	2540203	278304	276736	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC1604.09c	rrp4	SPBC1604.09c	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592517	2541813	2540437	278304	276965	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC25B2.07c	rrp4	mmb1	SPAC2F7.14c	mug164	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592518	2541813	2540874	278304	277391	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC4F6.07c	rrp4	SPBC4F6.07c	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592519	2541813	2541087	278304	277602	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC646.10c	rrp4	SPBC646.10c	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592520	2541813	2541136	278304	277651	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC691.04	rrp4	SPBC691.04	SPAC2F7.14c	pi031|SPACTOKYO_453.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592521	2541813	2541303	278304	277815	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBP22H7.02c	rrp4	SPBP22H7.02c	SPAC2F7.14c	pi029|SPACTOKYO_453.05c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592522	2541813	2541610	278304	278107	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC24C9.11	rrp4	SPAC24C9.11	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592523	2541813	2541706	278304	278201	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC16E8.15	rrp4	tif45	SPAC2F7.14c	tif1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592524	2541813	2541814	278304	278305	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC23G3.06	rrp4	SPAC23G3.06	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592525	2541813	2542038	278304	278520	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC23C11.03	rrp4	SPAC23C11.03	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592526	2541813	2542138	278304	278614	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC589.10c	rrp4	SPAC589.10c	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592527	2541813	2542446	278304	278907	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC19A8.07c	rrp4	SPAC19A8.07c	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592528	2541813	2543131	278304	279563	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC12G12.04	rrp4	mcp60	SPAC2F7.14c	hsp60	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592529	2541813	2543484	278304	279904	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC959.03c	rrp4	SPAC959.03c	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592530	2541813	2543614	278304	280028	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC4F8.06	rrp4	SPAC4F8.06	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592531	2541813	3361520	278304	280596	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC1610.02c	rrp4	SPAC1610.02c	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592532	2541813	9407293	278304	1028656	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC1442.19	rrp4	SPCC1442.19	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592533	2541813	2540873	278304	277390	SPAC2F7.14c	SPBC4C3.05c	rrp4	nuc1	SPAC2F7.14c	rpa1|rpa190	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592534	2541813	2542218	278304	278692	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC589.09	rrp4	csr101	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC589.09	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592535	2541813	2539299	278304	275867	SPAC2F7.14c	SPCC1672.07	rrp4	SPCC1672.07	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592536	2541813	2543500	278304	279918	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC926.08c	rrp4	SPAC926.08c	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592537	2541813	2543504	278304	279922	SPAC2F7.14c	SPAC4G9.17c	rrp4	mrps5	SPAC2F7.14c	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2592541	2539351	2540398	275917	276926	SPCC1840.11	SPBC26H8.10	csl4	dis3	SPCC965.01	rrp44	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Telekawa C (2018)	30321377	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2593512	2540604	2541530	277130	278030	SPBC25D12.05	SPAC57A10.10c	trm1	sla1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Vakiloroayaei A (2017)	28977649	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	genetic complex|triple mutants show increased lethality	-	BIOGRID
2593513	2540604	2543630	277130	280044	SPBC25D12.05	SPAC1F3.01	trm1	rrp6	-	SPAC3H8.11	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Vakiloroayaei A (2017)	28977649	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	genetic complex|triple mutants show increased lethality	-	BIOGRID
2593514	2541530	2543630	278030	280044	SPAC57A10.10c	SPAC1F3.01	sla1	rrp6	-	SPAC3H8.11	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Vakiloroayaei A (2017)	28977649	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity	genetic complex|triple mutants show increased lethality	-	BIOGRID
2593522	2542767	2542393	279217	278857	SPAC1565.07c	SPAC17G6.12	knd1	cul1	SPAC1565.07c	pcu1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Straube R (2017)	29149173	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2593523	2543645	2543272	280059	279700	SPAC607.09c	SPAC1002.07c	btn1	ats1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593524	2543645	2543029	280059	279465	SPAC607.09c	SPAC11G7.01	btn1	SPAC11G7.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593525	2543645	2541704	280059	278199	SPAC607.09c	SPAC1250.04c	btn1	atl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593526	2543645	3361436	280059	280512	SPAC607.09c	SPAC1296.01c	btn1	SPAC1296.01c	-	SPAC22F3.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593527	2543645	2542614	280059	279068	SPAC607.09c	SPAC1399.04c	btn1	SPAC1399.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593528	2543645	2542815	280059	279262	SPAC607.09c	SPAC13D6.01	btn1	pof14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593529	2543645	2542829	280059	279276	SPAC607.09c	SPAC13D6.02c	btn1	byr3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593530	2543645	2542872	280059	279317	SPAC607.09c	SPAC13D6.04c	btn1	btb3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593531	2543645	2542833	280059	279280	SPAC607.09c	SPAC13F5.01c	btn1	msh1	-	SPAC23C11.18c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593532	2543645	2542881	280059	279326	SPAC607.09c	SPAC13F5.03c	btn1	gld1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593533	2543645	2542892	280059	279336	SPAC607.09c	SPAC13F5.04c	btn1	vta1	-	SPAC13F5.04c|new6|SPAC13F5.08|vts1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593534	2543645	2542841	280059	279287	SPAC607.09c	SPAC13F5.05	btn1	SPAC13F5.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593535	2543645	2542901	280059	279345	SPAC607.09c	SPAC13F5.07c	btn1	SPAC13F5.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593536	2543645	2542875	280059	279320	SPAC607.09c	SPAC13G7.02c	btn1	ssa1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593537	2543645	2542852	280059	279298	SPAC607.09c	SPAC13G7.09c	btn1	SPAC13G7.09c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593538	2543645	2542862	280059	279308	SPAC607.09c	SPAC140.03	btn1	arb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593539	2543645	2542747	280059	279197	SPAC607.09c	SPAC15A10.06	btn1	SPAC15A10.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593540	2543645	2542364	280059	278828	SPAC607.09c	SPAC1783.01	btn1	SPAC1783.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593541	2543645	2542368	280059	278832	SPAC607.09c	SPAC1783.06c	btn1	atg12	-	apg12	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593542	2543645	2542140	280059	278616	SPAC607.09c	SPAC1783.07c	btn1	pap1	-	caf3	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593543	2543645	2542189	280059	278664	SPAC607.09c	SPAC17A5.09c	btn1	glc9	-	SPAC17A5.09c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593544	2543645	2542168	280059	278643	SPAC607.09c	SPAC17A5.16	btn1	ftp105	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593545	2543645	2542389	280059	278853	SPAC607.09c	SPAC17A5.18c	btn1	rec25	-	mug19	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593546	2543645	2542194	280059	278669	SPAC607.09c	SPAC17G6.17	btn1	pof8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593547	2543645	2542409	280059	278873	SPAC607.09c	SPAC17G8.10c	btn1	dma1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593548	2543645	2542295	280059	278763	SPAC607.09c	SPAC17H9.03c	btn1	rdl1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593549	2543645	2542253	280059	278723	SPAC607.09c	SPAC17H9.04c	btn1	SPAC17H9.04c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593550	2543645	2542297	280059	278764	SPAC607.09c	SPAC17H9.06c	btn1	SPAC17H9.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593551	2543645	2542259	280059	278728	SPAC607.09c	SPAC17H9.11	btn1	gmf1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593552	2543645	2542246	280059	278716	SPAC607.09c	SPAC17H9.12c	btn1	SPAC17H9.12c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593553	2543645	2542270	280059	278739	SPAC607.09c	SPAC17H9.14c	btn1	pdi2	-	SPAC17H9.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593554	2543645	2542185	280059	278660	SPAC607.09c	SPAC18G6.01c	btn1	SPAC18G6.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593555	2543645	2542239	280059	278711	SPAC607.09c	SPAC18G6.02c	btn1	chp1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593556	2543645	2542235	280059	278707	SPAC607.09c	SPAC18G6.05c	btn1	SPAC18G6.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593557	2543645	2542544	280059	279001	SPAC607.09c	SPAC18G6.10	btn1	lem2	-	heh1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593558	2543645	2542521	280059	278979	SPAC607.09c	SPAC18G6.12c	btn1	SPAC18G6.12c	-	B22918-1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593559	2543645	2542507	280059	278965	SPAC607.09c	SPAC18G6.13	btn1	SPAC18G6.13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593560	2543645	2542469	280059	278930	SPAC607.09c	SPAC19A8.04	btn1	erg5	-	cyp61	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593561	2543645	2542497	280059	278956	SPAC607.09c	SPAC1A6.04c	btn1	plb1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593562	2543645	2542512	280059	278970	SPAC607.09c	SPAC1B3.01c	btn1	SPAC1B3.01c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593563	2543645	2542126	280059	278602	SPAC607.09c	SPAC1B3.05	btn1	not3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593564	2543645	2542459	280059	278920	SPAC607.09c	SPAC1D4.03c	btn1	aut12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593565	2543645	2541740	280059	278234	SPAC607.09c	SPAC20G4.07c	btn1	sts1	-	erg4	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593566	2543645	2541941	280059	278428	SPAC607.09c	SPAC20H4.03c	btn1	tfs1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593567	2543645	2542014	280059	278497	SPAC607.09c	SPAC20H4.04	btn1	fml2	-	mfh2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593568	2543645	2542010	280059	278493	SPAC607.09c	SPAC20H4.05c	btn1	SPAC20H4.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593569	2543645	2542000	280059	278484	SPAC607.09c	SPAC20H4.06c	btn1	SPAC20H4.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593570	2543645	2542874	280059	279319	SPAC607.09c	SPAC20H4.09	btn1	SPAC20H4.09	-	SPAC145.03	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593571	2543645	2542023	280059	278506	SPAC607.09c	SPAC20H4.10	btn1	ufd2	-	SPAC145.04	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593572	2543645	2542013	280059	278496	SPAC607.09c	SPAC20H4.11c	btn1	rho5	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593573	2543645	2541444	280059	277949	SPAC607.09c	SPAC22H10.04	btn1	ppa3	-	SPAC22H10.04|ppg1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593574	2543645	2542025	280059	278507	SPAC607.09c	SPAC23C11.01	btn1	SPAC23C11.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593575	2543645	2542051	280059	278530	SPAC607.09c	SPAC23C11.06c	btn1	SPAC23C11.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593576	2543645	2542030	280059	278512	SPAC607.09c	SPAC23C11.07	btn1	SPAC23C11.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593577	2543645	2542060	280059	278538	SPAC607.09c	SPAC23C11.14	btn1	zhf1	-	zhf	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593578	2543645	2541522	280059	278023	SPAC607.09c	SPAC23E2.01	btn1	fep1	-	gaf2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593579	2543645	2541866	280059	278356	SPAC607.09c	SPAC23H3.11c	btn1	SPAC23H3.11c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593580	2543645	2541691	280059	278187	SPAC607.09c	SPAC25A8.02	btn1	atg14	-	SPAC25A8.02	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593581	2543645	2541700	280059	278196	SPAC607.09c	SPAC32A11.02c	btn1	SPAC32A11.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593582	2543645	2542405	280059	278869	SPAC607.09c	SPAC32A11.03c	btn1	phx1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593583	2543645	3361512	280059	280588	SPAC607.09c	SPAC3C7.01c	btn1	sac12	-	SPAC3C7.01c|SPAC732.03c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593584	2543645	2541709	280059	278204	SPAC607.09c	SPAC3C7.02c	btn1	pil2	-	SPAC3C7.02c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593585	2543645	2543687	280059	280101	SPAC607.09c	SPAC3C7.04	btn1	SPAC3C7.04	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593586	2543645	2543191	280059	279620	SPAC607.09c	SPAC3C7.05c	btn1	mug191	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593587	2543645	2543071	280059	279504	SPAC607.09c	SPAC3C7.06c	btn1	pit1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593588	2543645	2542941	280059	279382	SPAC607.09c	SPAC3C7.07c	btn1	SPAC3C7.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593589	2543645	2543159	280059	279590	SPAC607.09c	SPAC3C7.09	btn1	set8	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593590	2543645	2543046	280059	279481	SPAC607.09c	SPAC3C7.10	btn1	pex13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593591	2543645	2543044	280059	279479	SPAC607.09c	SPAC3C7.12	btn1	tip1	-	noc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593592	2543645	2543207	280059	279636	SPAC607.09c	SPAC3C7.13c	btn1	SPAC3C7.13c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593593	2543645	2543376	280059	279798	SPAC607.09c	SPAC3H1.06c	btn1	SPAC3H1.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593594	2543645	2543367	280059	279789	SPAC607.09c	SPAC3H1.10	btn1	pcs2	-	SPAC3H1.10|pcs	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593595	2543645	2543443	280059	279863	SPAC607.09c	SPAC3H1.12c	btn1	snt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593596	2543645	2543440	280059	279860	SPAC607.09c	SPAC3H1.13	btn1	ppk13	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593597	2543645	2543442	280059	279862	SPAC607.09c	SPAC3H1.14	btn1	SPAC3H1.14	-	SPAC9G1.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593598	2543645	2541542	280059	278042	SPAC607.09c	SPAC4G9.02	btn1	rnh201	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593599	2543645	2543404	280059	279826	SPAC607.09c	SPAC4G9.06c	btn1	chz1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593600	2543645	2543391	280059	279813	SPAC607.09c	SPAC4G9.09c	btn1	arg11	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593601	2543645	2543395	280059	279817	SPAC607.09c	SPAC4G9.13c	btn1	vps26	-	pep8	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593602	2543645	2543598	280059	280013	SPAC607.09c	SPAC4G9.14	btn1	SPAC4G9.14	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593603	2543645	2543680	280059	280094	SPAC607.09c	SPAC4G9.20c	btn1	SPAC4G9.20c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593604	2543645	2543329	280059	279752	SPAC607.09c	SPAC56F8.02	btn1	SPAC56F8.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593605	2543645	2542579	280059	279035	SPAC607.09c	SPAC589.05c	btn1	SPAC589.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593606	2543645	2543169	280059	279600	SPAC607.09c	SPAC607.06c	btn1	SPAC607.06c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593607	2543645	2543158	280059	279589	SPAC607.09c	SPAC607.07c	btn1	SPAC607.07c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593608	2543645	2543520	280059	279938	SPAC607.09c	SPAC607.10	btn1	spo3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593609	2543645	2543390	280059	279812	SPAC607.09c	SPAC631.01c	btn1	acp2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593610	2543645	2543426	280059	279846	SPAC607.09c	SPAC631.02	btn1	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593611	2543645	2541633	280059	278129	SPAC607.09c	SPAC664.01c	btn1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593612	2543645	2543283	280059	279709	SPAC607.09c	SPAC6C3.04	btn1	cit1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593613	2543645	2543274	280059	279702	SPAC607.09c	SPAC6C3.05	btn1	SPAC6C3.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593614	2543645	2542954	280059	279394	SPAC607.09c	SPAC6C3.07	btn1	mug68	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593615	2543645	2543214	280059	279643	SPAC607.09c	SPAC6F12.06	btn1	SPAC6F12.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593616	2543645	2542198	280059	278673	SPAC607.09c	SPAC6F12.09	btn1	rdp1	-	rdr1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593617	2543645	2542382	280059	278846	SPAC607.09c	SPAC6G10.06	btn1	SPAC6G10.06	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593618	2543645	2541800	280059	278291	SPAC607.09c	SPAC732.02c	btn1	SPAC732.02c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593619	2543645	2542724	280059	279175	SPAC607.09c	SPAC767.01c	btn1	vps1	-	SPAC9G1.14c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593620	2543645	2543555	280059	279972	SPAC607.09c	SPAC922.05c	btn1	SPAC922.05c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593621	2543645	2542873	280059	279318	SPAC607.09c	SPAC9G1.02	btn1	wis4	-	wak1|wik1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593622	2543645	2542876	280059	279321	SPAC607.09c	SPAC9G1.04	btn1	oxa101	-	oxa1|oxa1-1|oxa1sp1	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593623	2543645	2542795	280059	279243	SPAC607.09c	SPAC9G1.05	btn1	aip1	-	SPAC9G1.05	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593624	2543645	2542740	280059	279190	SPAC607.09c	SPAC9G1.06c	btn1	cyk3	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593625	2543645	2542759	280059	279209	SPAC607.09c	SPAC9G1.07	btn1	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593626	2543645	2542787	280059	279236	SPAC607.09c	SPAC9G1.08c	btn1	SPAC9G1.08c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593627	2543645	2542329	280059	278795	SPAC607.09c	SPAC9G1.10c	btn1	SPAC9G1.10c	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593628	2543645	2542193	280059	278668	SPAC607.09c	SPAC9G1.11c	btn1	spn4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593629	2543645	2542192	280059	278667	SPAC607.09c	SPAC9G1.12	btn1	cpd1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593630	2543645	2541644	280059	278140	SPAC607.09c	SPAP11E10.01	btn1	SPAP11E10.01	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593631	2543645	2541915	280059	278405	SPAC607.09c	SPAP14E8.04	btn1	oma1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593632	2543645	2541892	280059	278382	SPAC607.09c	SPAP27G11.02	btn1	SPAP27G11.02	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593633	2543645	2543600	280059	280015	SPAC607.09c	SPAPB1A10.05	btn1	SPAPB1A10.05	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593634	2543645	2543430	280059	279850	SPAC607.09c	SPAPB1A10.12c	btn1	alo1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593635	2543645	2543437	280059	279857	SPAC607.09c	SPAPB1A10.14	btn1	pof15	-	SPAPB1A10.14	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593636	2543645	2539604	280059	276162	SPAC607.09c	SPBC1105.14	btn1	rsv2	-	SPNCRNA.422|SPNG1836	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593637	2543645	2539913	280059	276457	SPAC607.09c	SPBC11G11.03	btn1	mrt4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593638	2543645	2539702	280059	276255	SPAC607.09c	SPBC1604.12	btn1	SPBC1604.12	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593639	2543645	2540163	280059	276698	SPAC607.09c	SPBC1652.02	btn1	SPBC1652.02	-	aap1|SPBC16A3.20c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593640	2543645	2539953	280059	276497	SPAC607.09c	SPBC1709.11c	btn1	png2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593641	2543645	2540538	280059	277065	SPAC607.09c	SPBC26H8.03	btn1	cho2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593642	2543645	2540680	280059	277205	SPAC607.09c	SPBC26H8.05c	btn1	pph3	-	SPBC26H8.05c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593643	2543645	2540558	280059	277085	SPAC607.09c	SPBC2D10.17	btn1	clr1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593644	2543645	2540282	280059	276813	SPAC607.09c	SPBC2G2.03c	btn1	sbh1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593645	2543645	2540473	280059	277001	SPAC607.09c	SPBC30D10.10c	btn1	tor1	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593646	2543645	2541055	280059	277570	SPAC607.09c	SPBC409.07c	btn1	wis1	-	smf2|spc2	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593647	2543645	2540606	280059	277132	SPAC607.09c	SPBC428.03c	btn1	pho4	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593648	2543645	2540689	280059	277214	SPAC607.09c	SPBC428.06c	btn1	rxt2	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593649	2543645	2541045	280059	277560	SPAC607.09c	SPBC543.03c	btn1	pku80	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593650	2543645	2540863	280059	277380	SPAC607.09c	SPBC56F2.03	btn1	SPBC56F2.03	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593651	2543645	2539061	280059	275633	SPAC607.09c	SPCC126.15c	btn1	sec65	-	-	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593652	2543645	2539024	280059	275597	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1902.01	btn1	gaf1	-	SPCC417.01c	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593653	2543645	2539099	280059	275671	SPAC607.09c	SPCC24B10.22	btn1	pog1	-	SPCPB16A4.01	Negative Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593654	2543645	2543254	280059	279682	SPAC607.09c	SPAC1006.03c	btn1	red1	-	iss3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593655	2543645	2541694	280059	278190	SPAC607.09c	SPAC1071.04c	btn1	spc2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593656	2543645	2543051	280059	279486	SPAC607.09c	SPAC1071.08	btn1	rpp203	-	rla6|rpp2-3|rpa2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593657	2543645	2542922	280059	279363	SPAC607.09c	SPAC1142.07c	btn1	vps32	-	snf7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593658	2543645	2541552	280059	278051	SPAC607.09c	SPAC1142.08	btn1	fhl1	-	SPAC8C9.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593659	2543645	2541512	280059	278013	SPAC607.09c	SPAC11E3.08c	btn1	nse6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593660	2543645	2542817	280059	279264	SPAC607.09c	SPAC13G6.02c	btn1	rps101	-	rps1-1|rps3a-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593661	2543645	2542826	280059	279273	SPAC607.09c	SPAC13G6.09	btn1	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593662	2543645	2542855	280059	279301	SPAC607.09c	SPAC144.04c	btn1	spe1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593663	2543645	2542904	280059	279348	SPAC607.09c	SPAC144.11	btn1	rps1102	-	rps11|rps11-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593664	2543645	2542886	280059	279331	SPAC607.09c	SPAC1486.01	btn1	SPAC1486.01	-	sod2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593665	2543645	2541611	280059	278108	SPAC607.09c	SPAC1527.02	btn1	sft2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593666	2543645	2542349	280059	278814	SPAC607.09c	SPAC1782.05	btn1	ypa2	-	SPAC1782.05|pta2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593667	2543645	2542359	280059	278824	SPAC607.09c	SPAC1782.11	btn1	met14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593668	2543645	2542268	280059	278737	SPAC607.09c	SPAC17A5.07c	btn1	ulp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593669	2543645	2542186	280059	278661	SPAC607.09c	SPAC17C9.14	btn1	SPAC17C9.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593670	2543645	2542170	280059	278645	SPAC607.09c	SPAC17G8.13c	btn1	mst2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593671	2543645	2542560	280059	279016	SPAC607.09c	SPAC1851.02	btn1	slc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593672	2543645	2542564	280059	279020	SPAC607.09c	SPAC1851.03	btn1	ckb1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593673	2543645	2542462	280059	278923	SPAC607.09c	SPAC19B12.11c	btn1	SPAC19B12.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593674	2543645	2542493	280059	278952	SPAC607.09c	SPAC1B2.04	btn1	cox6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593675	2543645	2542518	280059	278976	SPAC607.09c	SPAC1B3.16c	btn1	vht1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593676	2543645	2542269	280059	278738	SPAC607.09c	SPAC1F12.07	btn1	SPAC1F12.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593677	2543645	2541746	280059	278240	SPAC607.09c	SPAC20G4.04c	btn1	hus1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593678	2543645	2541464	280059	277966	SPAC607.09c	SPAC222.08c	btn1	SPAC222.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593679	2543645	2541909	280059	278399	SPAC607.09c	SPAC227.01c	btn1	erd1	-	SPAC227.01c|SPAPB21F2.04c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593680	2543645	2542066	280059	278543	SPAC607.09c	SPAC227.05	btn1	SPAC227.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593681	2543645	2541838	280059	278329	SPAC607.09c	SPAC22A12.04c	btn1	rps2201	-	rps15a-1|rps22-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593682	2543645	2541680	280059	278176	SPAC607.09c	SPAC22F8.09	btn1	rrp16	-	nop53	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593683	2543645	2541730	280059	278224	SPAC607.09c	SPAC22H10.11c	btn1	SPAC22H10.11c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593684	2543645	2542032	280059	278514	SPAC607.09c	SPAC23C11.04c	btn1	pnk1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593685	2543645	2541970	280059	278455	SPAC607.09c	SPAC23C11.13c	btn1	hpt1	-	pur1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593686	2543645	2541778	280059	278271	SPAC607.09c	SPAC23G3.05c	btn1	SPAC23G3.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593687	2543645	2541720	280059	278214	SPAC607.09c	SPAC23H3.13c	btn1	gpa2	-	git8	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593688	2543645	3361383	280059	280459	SPAC607.09c	SPAC24B11.13	btn1	hem3	-	SPAC806.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593689	2543645	2542637	280059	279091	SPAC607.09c	SPAC24H6.03	btn1	cul3	-	pcu3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593690	2543645	2541531	280059	278031	SPAC607.09c	SPAC25A8.01c	btn1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593691	2543645	2542751	280059	279201	SPAC607.09c	SPAC25G10.06	btn1	rps2801	-	rps28-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593692	2543645	2542716	280059	279169	SPAC607.09c	SPAC25H1.07	btn1	emc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593693	2543645	2542685	280059	279138	SPAC607.09c	SPAC26A3.06	btn1	bud23	-	SPAC26A3.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593694	2543645	2542701	280059	279154	SPAC607.09c	SPAC26H5.05	btn1	mga2	-	SPAC26H5.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593695	2543645	2542458	280059	278919	SPAC607.09c	SPAC30.02c	btn1	SPAC30.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593696	2543645	2541714	280059	278209	SPAC607.09c	SPAC30.03c	btn1	tsn1	-	mug90|tsn	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593697	2543645	2543076	280059	279509	SPAC607.09c	SPAC30C2.07	btn1	SPAC30C2.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593698	2543645	2542103	280059	278579	SPAC607.09c	SPAC31G5.11	btn1	pac2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593699	2543645	2542561	280059	279017	SPAC607.09c	SPAC31G5.17c	btn1	rps1001	-	rps10-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593700	2543645	2542476	280059	278936	SPAC607.09c	SPAC323.05c	btn1	SPAC323.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593701	2543645	2541712	280059	278207	SPAC607.09c	SPAC328.10c	btn1	rps502	-	rps5-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593702	2543645	2542867	280059	279312	SPAC607.09c	SPAC343.16	btn1	lys2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593703	2543645	3361531	280059	280607	SPAC607.09c	SPAC343.19	btn1	lsb6	-	SPAC824.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593704	2543645	2542725	280059	279176	SPAC607.09c	SPAC3A12.10	btn1	rpl2001	-	rpl18a-2|rpl20|rpl20-1|yl17b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593705	2543645	2543108	280059	279540	SPAC607.09c	SPAC3A12.13c	btn1	SPAC3A12.13c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593706	2543645	2543454	280059	279874	SPAC607.09c	SPAC3G9.08	btn1	png1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593707	2543645	2543633	280059	280047	SPAC607.09c	SPAC3H8.05c	btn1	mms1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593708	2543645	2543378	280059	279800	SPAC607.09c	SPAC3H8.07c	btn1	pac10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593709	2543645	2543613	280059	280027	SPAC607.09c	SPAC4F10.19c	btn1	SPAC4F10.19c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593710	2543645	2543099	280059	279531	SPAC607.09c	SPAC4G9.15	btn1	SPAC4G9.15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593711	2543645	2543354	280059	279776	SPAC607.09c	SPAC521.05	btn1	rps802	-	rps8-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593712	2543645	2543219	280059	279647	SPAC607.09c	SPAC56F8.09	btn1	rrp8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593713	2543645	2542781	280059	279230	SPAC607.09c	SPAC57A10.12c	btn1	ura3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593714	2543645	2542714	280059	279167	SPAC607.09c	SPAC5H10.06c	btn1	adh4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593715	2543645	2543402	280059	279824	SPAC607.09c	SPAC630.14c	btn1	tup12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593716	2543645	2543682	280059	280096	SPAC607.09c	SPAC637.10c	btn1	rpn10	-	pus1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593717	2543645	2543563	280059	279979	SPAC607.09c	SPAC664.02c	btn1	arp8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593718	2543645	2543237	280059	279665	SPAC607.09c	SPAC6B12.02c	btn1	mus7	-	mms22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593719	2543645	2542598	280059	279052	SPAC607.09c	SPAC6G10.08	btn1	idp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593720	2543645	2542845	280059	279291	SPAC607.09c	SPAC824.04	btn1	SPAC824.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593721	2543645	2543532	280059	279950	SPAC607.09c	SPAC890.05	btn1	SPAC890.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593722	2543645	2543022	280059	279458	SPAC607.09c	SPAC8C9.07	btn1	SPAC8C9.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593723	2543645	5802920	280059	858058	SPAC607.09c	SPAC8C9.19	btn1	SPAC8C9.19	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593724	2543645	2543434	280059	279854	SPAC607.09c	SPAC8F11.02c	btn1	dph3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593725	2543645	2543406	280059	279828	SPAC607.09c	SPAC9.12c	btn1	atp12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593726	2543645	3361543	280059	280619	SPAC607.09c	SPAC9.13c	btn1	cwf16	-	SPAPJ735.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593727	2543645	2543545	280059	279962	SPAC607.09c	SPAC926.03	btn1	rlc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593728	2543645	14218018	280059	4254380	SPAC607.09c	SPAC959.06c	btn1	SPAC959.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593729	2543645	2542633	280059	279087	SPAC607.09c	SPAP27G11.14c	btn1	SPAP27G11.14c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593730	2543645	2541678	280059	278174	SPAC607.09c	SPAP7G5.05	btn1	rpl1002	-	rpl10|rpl10-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593731	2543645	2542597	280059	279051	SPAC607.09c	SPAP8A3.07c	btn1	SPAP8A3.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593732	2543645	2543670	280059	280084	SPAC607.09c	SPAPB1E7.06c	btn1	eme1	-	mms4|slx2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593733	2543645	2539781	280059	276331	SPAC607.09c	SPBC106.10	btn1	pka1	-	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593734	2543645	2539905	280059	276451	SPAC607.09c	SPBC106.17c	btn1	cys2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593735	2543645	2540061	280059	276599	SPAC607.09c	SPBC119.12	btn1	rud3	-	SPBC119.12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593736	2543645	2539648	280059	276203	SPAC607.09c	SPBC1198.08	btn1	SPBC1198.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593737	2543645	2540181	280059	276714	SPAC607.09c	SPBC1271.15c	btn1	SPBC1271.15c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593738	2543645	2539736	280059	276288	SPAC607.09c	SPBC12C2.12c	btn1	glo1	-	SPBC21D10.03c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593739	2543645	2540106	280059	276643	SPAC607.09c	SPBC12D12.09	btn1	rev7	-	SPAC12D12.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593740	2543645	2539673	280059	276228	SPAC607.09c	SPBC13G1.10c	btn1	mug81	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593741	2543645	2539893	280059	276439	SPAC607.09c	SPBC1539.10	btn1	nop16	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593742	2543645	2539872	280059	276418	SPAC607.09c	SPBC15C4.01c	btn1	oca3	-	emc2|SPBC14C8.18c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593743	2543645	2540180	280059	276713	SPAC607.09c	SPBC16D10.11c	btn1	rps1801	-	rps18-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593744	2543645	2539733	280059	276285	SPAC607.09c	SPBC16E9.12c	btn1	pab2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593745	2543645	2539703	280059	276256	SPAC607.09c	SPBC16G5.15c	btn1	fkh2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593746	2543645	2540078	280059	276616	SPAC607.09c	SPBC16H5.08c	btn1	SPBC16H5.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593747	2543645	2540120	280059	276657	SPAC607.09c	SPBC1703.12	btn1	ubp9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593748	2543645	2539739	280059	276291	SPAC607.09c	SPBC1711.03	btn1	aim27	-	emc3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593749	2543645	2539675	280059	276230	SPAC607.09c	SPBC1718.03	btn1	ker1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593750	2543645	2540068	280059	276606	SPAC607.09c	SPBC1734.12c	btn1	alg12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593751	2543645	2540146	280059	276683	SPAC607.09c	SPBC17A3.06	btn1	SPBC17A3.06	-	pi040	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593752	2543645	2540213	280059	276746	SPAC607.09c	SPBC17D1.06	btn1	dbp3	-	SPCC17D1.06	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593753	2543645	2540647	280059	277172	SPAC607.09c	SPBC18H10.07	btn1	SPBC18H10.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593754	2543645	5802781	280059	857919	SPAC607.09c	SPBC18H10.13	btn1	rps1402	-	rps14-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593755	2543645	2540649	280059	277174	SPAC607.09c	SPBC19F8.08	btn1	rps401	-	SPBC25H2.17c|rps4|rps4-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593756	2543645	2540769	280059	277289	SPAC607.09c	SPBC19G7.17	btn1	SPBC19G7.17	-	SPBC36B7.01	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593757	2543645	2540565	280059	277092	SPAC607.09c	SPBC1D7.04	btn1	mlo3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593758	2543645	2540691	280059	277216	SPAC607.09c	SPBC20F10.05	btn1	nrl1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593759	2543645	2540667	280059	277192	SPAC607.09c	SPBC211.06	btn1	gfh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593760	2543645	2540664	280059	277189	SPAC607.09c	SPBC215.02	btn1	bob1	-	gim5	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593761	2543645	2540325	280059	276855	SPAC607.09c	SPBC21B10.10	btn1	rps402	-	rps4-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593762	2543645	2540309	280059	276839	SPAC607.09c	SPBC21B10.13c	btn1	yox1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593763	2543645	2540617	280059	277143	SPAC607.09c	SPBC21C3.20c	btn1	git1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593764	2543645	2540502	280059	277030	SPAC607.09c	SPBC27B12.10c	btn1	tom7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593765	2543645	2540501	280059	277029	SPAC607.09c	SPBC27B12.11c	btn1	pho7	-	SPBC27B12.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593766	2543645	2540491	280059	277019	SPAC607.09c	SPBC28E12.04	btn1	SPBC28E12.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593767	2543645	2540290	280059	276821	SPAC607.09c	SPBC29A3.02c	btn1	his7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593768	2543645	2540363	280059	276892	SPAC607.09c	SPBC2F12.09c	btn1	atf21	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593769	2543645	2540306	280059	276836	SPAC607.09c	SPBC2G5.02c	btn1	ckb2	-	SPBC2G5.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593770	2543645	2540326	280059	276856	SPAC607.09c	SPBC2G5.06c	btn1	hmt2	-	cad1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593771	2543645	2540319	280059	276849	SPAC607.09c	SPBC30D10.16	btn1	pha2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593772	2543645	2540378	280059	276907	SPAC607.09c	SPBC30D10.18c	btn1	rpl102	-	rpl1-2|rpl10a-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593773	2543645	2540230	280059	276762	SPAC607.09c	SPBC32F12.05c	btn1	cwf12	-	isy1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593774	2543645	2540547	280059	277074	SPAC607.09c	SPBC32F12.11	btn1	tdh1	-	gpd1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593775	2543645	2539974	280059	276518	SPAC607.09c	SPBC32H8.07	btn1	git5	-	gpb1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593776	2543645	2540313	280059	276843	SPAC607.09c	SPBC337.04	btn1	ppk27	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593777	2543645	2541026	280059	277541	SPAC607.09c	SPBC337.09	btn1	erg28	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593778	2543645	2541017	280059	277532	SPAC607.09c	SPBC36.07	btn1	elp1	-	iki3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593779	2543645	2540299	280059	276830	SPAC607.09c	SPBC3B9.13c	btn1	rpp102	-	rpp1-2|rpa103	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593780	2543645	2540320	280059	276850	SPAC607.09c	SPBC3D6.04c	btn1	mad1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593781	2543645	2540275	280059	276806	SPAC607.09c	SPBC3E7.09	btn1	SPBC3E7.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593782	2543645	2540903	280059	277419	SPAC607.09c	SPBC530.05	btn1	prt1	-	SPBC530.05	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593783	2543645	2540913	280059	277429	SPAC607.09c	SPBC56F2.08c	btn1	SPBC56F2.08c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593784	2543645	2541088	280059	277603	SPAC607.09c	SPBC609.05	btn1	pob3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593785	2543645	2541123	280059	277638	SPAC607.09c	SPBC651.09c	btn1	prf1	-	SPBC651.09c|rtf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593786	2543645	2541115	280059	277630	SPAC607.09c	SPBC660.07	btn1	ntp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593787	2543645	2541157	280059	277672	SPAC607.09c	SPBC6B1.06c	btn1	ubp14	-	ucp2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593788	2543645	2541186	280059	277700	SPAC607.09c	SPBC725.01	btn1	SPBC725.01	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593789	2543645	2541183	280059	277697	SPAC607.09c	SPBC725.14	btn1	arg6	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593790	2543645	2541241	280059	277755	SPAC607.09c	SPBC887.17	btn1	SPBC887.17	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593791	2543645	2541235	280059	277749	SPAC607.09c	SPBC8D2.12c	btn1	SPBC8D2.12c	-	pI053	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593792	2543645	2541250	280059	277764	SPAC607.09c	SPBC8D2.17	btn1	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593793	2543645	2541218	280059	277732	SPAC607.09c	SPBC8D2.18c	btn1	SPBC8D2.18c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593794	2543645	2541349	280059	277860	SPAC607.09c	SPBP35G2.08c	btn1	air1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593795	2543645	2541369	280059	277880	SPAC607.09c	SPBP4H10.13	btn1	rps2302	-	rps23-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593796	2543645	2541361	280059	277872	SPAC607.09c	SPBP8B7.10c	btn1	utp16	-	SPBP8B7.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593797	2543645	2541354	280059	277865	SPAC607.09c	SPBPB7E8.02	btn1	SPBPB7E8.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593798	2543645	2538977	280059	275551	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1020.06c	btn1	tal1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593799	2543645	2538948	280059	275522	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1020.07	btn1	SPCC1020.07	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593800	2543645	2539239	280059	275809	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1020.10	btn1	oca2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593801	2543645	2538978	280059	275552	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1020.11c	btn1	ecm6	-	SPCC1020.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593802	2543645	2539015	280059	275588	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1183.02	btn1	SPCC1183.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593803	2543645	2538878	280059	275457	SPAC607.09c	SPCC11E10.03	btn1	mug1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593804	2543645	2538741	280059	275324	SPAC607.09c	SPCC11E10.05c	btn1	ynd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593805	2543645	2538987	280059	275561	SPAC607.09c	SPCC11E10.06c	btn1	elp4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593806	2543645	2539050	280059	275623	SPAC607.09c	SPCC11E10.08	btn1	rik1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593807	2543645	2539049	280059	275622	SPAC607.09c	SPCC11E10.09c	btn1	SPCC11E10.09c	-	SPCC188.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593808	2543645	2539079	280059	275651	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1223.01	btn1	SPCC1223.01	-	SPCC285.18	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593809	2543645	2539047	280059	275620	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1223.06	btn1	tea1	-	alp8	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593810	2543645	2539046	280059	275619	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1223.12c	btn1	meu10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593811	2543645	2539045	280059	275618	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1235.05c	btn1	fft2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593812	2543645	2538845	280059	275426	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1235.13	btn1	ght6	-	meu12	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593813	2543645	2538906	280059	275483	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1259.03	btn1	rpa12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593814	2543645	2539092	280059	275664	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1259.08	btn1	SPCC1259.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593815	2543645	2539081	280059	275653	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1259.09c	btn1	pdx1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593816	2543645	2539074	280059	275646	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1259.10	btn1	pgp1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593817	2543645	2539140	280059	275712	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1259.11c	btn1	gyp2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593818	2543645	2538871	280059	275450	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1259.14c	btn1	meu27	-	B8647-6	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593819	2543645	2539165	280059	275736	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1281.04	btn1	SPCC1281.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593820	2543645	2539028	280059	275601	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1281.07c	btn1	SPCC1281.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593821	2543645	2539167	280059	275738	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1281.08	btn1	wtf11	-	meu24	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593822	2543645	2538747	280059	275330	SPAC607.09c	SPCC132.01c	btn1	mtr1	-	SPCC132.01c|SPCC1322.17c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593823	2543645	2538868	280059	275448	SPAC607.09c	SPCC132.02	btn1	hst2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593824	2543645	2539148	280059	275720	SPAC607.09c	SPCC132.04c	btn1	gdh2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593825	2543645	2539073	280059	275645	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1322.02	btn1	pxd1	-	SPCC1322.02	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593826	2543645	2539071	280059	275643	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1322.03	btn1	trp1322	-	SPCC1322.03	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593827	2543645	2538800	280059	275381	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1322.06	btn1	kap113	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593828	2543645	2539245	280059	275815	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1322.07c	btn1	mug150	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593829	2543645	2539027	280059	275600	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1322.08	btn1	srk1	-	mkp1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593830	2543645	2538788	280059	275369	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1322.14c	btn1	vtc4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593831	2543645	2538815	280059	275396	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1322.15	btn1	rpl3402	-	rpl34|rpl34-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593832	2543645	2538888	280059	275466	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1322.16	btn1	phb2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593833	2543645	2538731	280059	275315	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1393.10	btn1	ctr4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593834	2543645	2538830	280059	275411	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1393.13	btn1	SPCC1393.13	-	prl64|SPNCRNA.64	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593835	2543645	2538955	280059	275529	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1450.02	btn1	bdf1	-	SPCC191.13|brf1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593836	2543645	2539202	280059	275773	SPAC607.09c	SPCC162.10	btn1	ppk33	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593837	2543645	2538993	280059	275567	SPAC607.09c	SPCC162.12	btn1	tco89	-	SPCC1753.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593838	2543645	2539244	280059	275814	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1672.06c	btn1	asp1	-	vip1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593839	2543645	2539178	280059	275749	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1682.14	btn1	rpl1902	-	rpl19-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593840	2543645	2539224	280059	275794	SPAC607.09c	SPCC16A11.01	btn1	SPCC16A11.01	-	SPCC63.15	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593841	2543645	2539233	280059	275803	SPAC607.09c	SPCC16A11.03c	btn1	SPCC16A11.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593842	2543645	2538748	280059	275331	SPAC607.09c	SPCC16A11.04	btn1	snx12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593843	2543645	2539368	280059	275934	SPAC607.09c	SPCC16A11.07	btn1	coq10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593844	2543645	2539317	280059	275883	SPAC607.09c	SPCC16A11.08	btn1	atg20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593845	2543645	2539182	280059	275753	SPAC607.09c	SPCC16A11.16c	btn1	rpn1302	-	rpn13|rpn13b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593846	2543645	2538989	280059	275563	SPAC607.09c	SPCC16C4.04	btn1	SPCC16C4.04	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593847	2543645	2539187	280059	275758	SPAC607.09c	SPCC16C4.14c	btn1	sfc4	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593848	2543645	2538916	280059	275493	SPAC607.09c	SPCC16C4.17	btn1	mug123	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593849	2543645	2538945	280059	275519	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1739.06c	btn1	SPCC1739.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593850	2543645	2538770	280059	275353	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1753.02c	btn1	git3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593851	2543645	2539330	280059	275896	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1753.03c	btn1	rec7	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593852	2543645	2538984	280059	275558	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1753.05	btn1	rsm1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593853	2543645	2539196	280059	275767	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1795.03	btn1	gms1	-	gmn3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593854	2543645	2538927	280059	275503	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1795.09	btn1	yps1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593855	2543645	2538756	280059	275339	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1795.10c	btn1	SPCC1795.10c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593856	2543645	2539160	280059	275732	SPAC607.09c	SPCC18.17c	btn1	SPCC18.17c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593857	2543645	2539387	280059	275952	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1840.03	btn1	sal3	-	pse1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593858	2543645	2539379	280059	275945	SPAC607.09c	SPCC188.02	btn1	par1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593859	2543645	2539385	280059	275950	SPAC607.09c	SPCC188.08c	btn1	ubp5	-	ubp22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593860	2543645	2539201	280059	275772	SPAC607.09c	SPCC188.09c	btn1	pfl4	-	SPCC188.09c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593861	2543645	2538950	280059	275524	SPAC607.09c	SPCC188.12	btn1	spn6	-	SPCC584.09	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593862	2543645	2539123	280059	275695	SPAC607.09c	SPCC18B5.03	btn1	wee1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593863	2543645	2539371	280059	275937	SPAC607.09c	SPCC18B5.06	btn1	dom34	-	SPCC18B5.06|erf1|sup45	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593864	2543645	2538959	280059	275533	SPAC607.09c	SPCC18B5.11c	btn1	cds1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593865	2543645	2538764	280059	275347	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1906.02c	btn1	cue3	-	SPCC1906.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593866	2543645	2538694	280059	275279	SPAC607.09c	SPCC191.09c	btn1	gst1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593867	2543645	2539136	280059	275708	SPAC607.09c	SPCC1919.05	btn1	SPCC1919.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593868	2543645	2539266	280059	275836	SPAC607.09c	SPCC23B6.01c	btn1	SPCC23B6.01c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593869	2543645	2538915	280059	275492	SPAC607.09c	SPCC23B6.02c	btn1	SPCC23B6.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593870	2543645	2539209	280059	275779	SPAC607.09c	SPCC23B6.03c	btn1	tel1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593871	2543645	2538775	280059	275357	SPAC607.09c	SPCC23B6.05c	btn1	ssb3	-	rpa3	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593872	2543645	2539251	280059	275821	SPAC607.09c	SPCC24B10.02c	btn1	SPCC24B10.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593873	2543645	2539116	280059	275688	SPAC607.09c	SPCC24B10.10c	btn1	yta4	-	SPCC24B10.10c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593874	2543645	2539006	280059	275579	SPAC607.09c	SPCC24B10.11c	btn1	mft1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593875	2543645	2539237	280059	275807	SPAC607.09c	SPCC24B10.13	btn1	skb5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593876	2543645	2539197	280059	275768	SPAC607.09c	SPCC24B10.14c	btn1	xlf1	-	mug104|nej1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593877	2543645	2538887	280059	275465	SPAC607.09c	SPCC24B10.15	btn1	SPCC24B10.15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593878	2543645	2539365	280059	275931	SPAC607.09c	SPCC24B10.16c	btn1	SPCC24B10.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593879	2543645	2539098	280059	275670	SPAC607.09c	SPCC24B10.18	btn1	SPCC24B10.18	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593880	2543645	2538907	280059	275484	SPAC607.09c	SPCC24B10.19c	btn1	nts1	-	SPCC24B10.19c|SPNCRNA.476|SPNG2250	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593881	2543645	2538958	280059	275532	SPAC607.09c	SPCC24B10.20	btn1	SPCC24B10.20	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593882	2543645	2539207	280059	275777	SPAC607.09c	SPCC285.09c	btn1	cgs2	-	pde1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593883	2543645	2539085	280059	275657	SPAC607.09c	SPCC285.15c	btn1	rps2802	-	rps28|rps28-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593884	2543645	2539310	280059	275877	SPAC607.09c	SPCC285.17	btn1	spp27	-	uaf30	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593885	2543645	2539210	280059	275780	SPAC607.09c	SPCC2H8.05c	btn1	dbl1	-	SPCC2H8.05c|SPCC63.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593886	2543645	2538926	280059	275502	SPAC607.09c	SPCC306.07c	btn1	SPCC306.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593887	2543645	2538873	280059	275452	SPAC607.09c	SPCC306.11	btn1	SPCC306.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593888	2543645	2538730	280059	275314	SPAC607.09c	SPCC31H12.02c	btn1	mug73	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593889	2543645	2538723	280059	275307	SPAC607.09c	SPCC31H12.06	btn1	mug111	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593890	2543645	2538949	280059	275523	SPAC607.09c	SPCC320.03	btn1	SPCC320.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593891	2543645	2538995	280059	275569	SPAC607.09c	SPCC320.06	btn1	SPCC320.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593892	2543645	2538738	280059	275321	SPAC607.09c	SPCC320.14	btn1	sry1	-	SPCC320.14|SPCC330.15c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593893	2543645	2539094	280059	275666	SPAC607.09c	SPCC330.02	btn1	rhp7	-	SPCC613.14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593894	2543645	2538981	280059	275555	SPAC607.09c	SPCC330.06c	btn1	pmp20	-	SPCC330.06c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593895	2543645	2539037	280059	275610	SPAC607.09c	SPCC330.07c	btn1	SPCC330.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593896	2543645	2538714	280059	275298	SPAC607.09c	SPCC330.11	btn1	btb1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593897	2543645	2539100	280059	275672	SPAC607.09c	SPCC330.12c	btn1	sdh3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593898	2543645	2538849	280059	275430	SPAC607.09c	SPCC330.14c	btn1	rpl2402	-	rpl24-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593899	2543645	2538810	280059	275391	SPAC607.09c	SPCC338.02	btn1	mug112	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593900	2543645	2538789	280059	275370	SPAC607.09c	SPCC338.04	btn1	cid2	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593901	2543645	2539044	280059	275617	SPAC607.09c	SPCC338.11c	btn1	rrg1	-	uvi22	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593902	2543645	2539527	280059	276089	SPAC607.09c	SPCC338.16	btn1	pof3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593903	2543645	2538839	280059	275420	SPAC607.09c	SPCC338.18	btn1	SPCC338.18	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593904	2543645	2539467	280059	276030	SPAC607.09c	SPCC417.07c	btn1	mto1	-	mbo1|mod20	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593905	2543645	2538876	280059	275455	SPAC607.09c	SPCC4B3.02c	btn1	SPCC4B3.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593906	2543645	2538837	280059	275418	SPAC607.09c	SPCC4B3.03c	btn1	SPCC4B3.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593907	2543645	2538718	280059	275302	SPAC607.09c	SPCC4B3.06c	btn1	SPCC4B3.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593908	2543645	2539438	280059	276001	SPAC607.09c	SPCC4B3.07	btn1	nro1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593909	2543645	2539555	280059	276116	SPAC607.09c	SPCC4B3.08	btn1	lsg1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593910	2543645	2539553	280059	276114	SPAC607.09c	SPCC4B3.11c	btn1	fra3	-	SPCC4B3.11c|aim1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593911	2543645	2539545	280059	276106	SPAC607.09c	SPCC4B3.12	btn1	set9	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593912	2543645	2539460	280059	276023	SPAC607.09c	SPCC4B3.13	btn1	SPCC4B3.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593913	2543645	2539510	280059	276072	SPAC607.09c	SPCC4G3.04c	btn1	coq5	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593914	2543645	2539465	280059	276028	SPAC607.09c	SPCC4G3.10c	btn1	rhp42	-	rhp4b	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593915	2543645	2538864	280059	275444	SPAC607.09c	SPCC550.01c	btn1	coa4	-	SPCC550.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593916	2543645	2538841	280059	275422	SPAC607.09c	SPCC550.03c	btn1	SPCC550.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593917	2543645	2539440	280059	276003	SPAC607.09c	SPCC550.08	btn1	SPCC550.08	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593918	2543645	2539457	280059	276020	SPAC607.09c	SPCC550.09	btn1	SPCC550.09	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593919	2543645	2539264	280059	275834	SPAC607.09c	SPCC550.10	btn1	atd3	-	meu8	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593920	2543645	2539463	280059	276026	SPAC607.09c	SPCC550.11	btn1	SPCC550.11	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593921	2543645	2539563	280059	276124	SPAC607.09c	SPCC550.15c	btn1	SPCC550.15c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593922	2543645	2538994	280059	275568	SPAC607.09c	SPCC553.01c	btn1	dbl2	-	SPCC553.01c|SPCC736.01c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593923	2543645	2539405	280059	275970	SPAC607.09c	SPCC553.03	btn1	pex1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593924	2543645	2539446	280059	276009	SPAC607.09c	SPCC553.12c	btn1	SPCC553.12c	-	SPCC794.13	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593925	2543645	2539008	280059	275581	SPAC607.09c	SPCC584.03c	btn1	SPCC584.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593926	2543645	2539095	280059	275667	SPAC607.09c	SPCC584.13	btn1	SPCC584.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593927	2543645	2539284	280059	275852	SPAC607.09c	SPCC584.15c	btn1	SPCC584.15c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593928	2543645	2539304	280059	275872	SPAC607.09c	SPCC584.16c	btn1	SPCC584.16c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593929	2543645	2538708	280059	275292	SPAC607.09c	SPCC594.01	btn1	SPCC594.01	-	SPCC736.16	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593930	2543645	2538998	280059	275572	SPAC607.09c	SPCC594.02c	btn1	SPCC594.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593931	2543645	2538847	280059	275428	SPAC607.09c	SPCC594.06c	btn1	SPCC594.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593932	2543645	2539582	280059	276141	SPAC607.09c	SPCC594.07c	btn1	bqt3	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593933	2543645	2539500	280059	276063	SPAC607.09c	SPCC61.03	btn1	SPCC61.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593934	2543645	2539029	280059	275602	SPAC607.09c	SPCC61.05	btn1	SPCC61.05	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593935	2543645	2539525	280059	276087	SPAC607.09c	SPCC613.01	btn1	SPCC613.01	-	SPCC757.14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593936	2543645	2539363	280059	275929	SPAC607.09c	SPCC613.02	btn1	SPCC613.02	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593937	2543645	2539464	280059	276027	SPAC607.09c	SPCC613.06	btn1	rpl902	-	rpl9-2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593938	2543645	2538848	280059	275429	SPAC607.09c	SPCC613.12c	btn1	raf1	-	clr8|cmc1|dos1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593939	2543645	2539533	280059	276095	SPAC607.09c	SPCC622.01c	btn1	SPCC622.01c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593940	2543645	2539499	280059	276062	SPAC607.09c	SPCC622.08c	btn1	hta1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593941	2543645	2539147	280059	275719	SPAC607.09c	SPCC622.12c	btn1	gdh1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593942	2543645	2539181	280059	275752	SPAC607.09c	SPCC622.14	btn1	SPCC622.14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593943	2543645	2539454	280059	276017	SPAC607.09c	SPCC622.15c	btn1	SPCC622.15c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593944	2543645	2539481	280059	276044	SPAC607.09c	SPCC622.16c	btn1	epe1	-	kdm2	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593945	2543645	2538794	280059	275375	SPAC607.09c	SPCC622.17	btn1	apn1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593946	2543645	2539424	280059	275989	SPAC607.09c	SPCC622.19	btn1	jmj4	-	mug149	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593947	2543645	2539584	280059	276143	SPAC607.09c	SPCC63.03	btn1	SPCC63.03	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593948	2543645	2539506	280059	276069	SPAC607.09c	SPCC63.04	btn1	mok14	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593949	2543645	2538796	280059	275377	SPAC607.09c	SPCC63.06	btn1	SPCC63.06	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593950	2543645	2538827	280059	275408	SPAC607.09c	SPCC63.14	btn1	eis1	-	SPCC63.14	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593951	2543645	2539580	280059	276139	SPAC607.09c	SPCC645.07	btn1	rgf1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593952	2543645	2539488	280059	276051	SPAC607.09c	SPCC645.08c	btn1	snd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593953	2543645	2539498	280059	276061	SPAC607.09c	SPCC645.11c	btn1	mug117	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593954	2543645	2538818	280059	275399	SPAC607.09c	SPCC645.12c	btn1	SPCC645.12c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593955	2543645	2538700	280059	275285	SPAC607.09c	SPCC645.13	btn1	SPCC645.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593956	2543645	2538709	280059	275293	SPAC607.09c	SPCC663.03	btn1	pmd1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593957	2543645	2539101	280059	275673	SPAC607.09c	SPCC736.04c	btn1	gma12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593958	2543645	2538840	280059	275421	SPAC607.09c	SPCC736.07c	btn1	SPCC736.07c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593959	2543645	2539455	280059	276018	SPAC607.09c	SPCC736.09c	btn1	SPCC736.09c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593960	2543645	2539566	280059	276126	SPAC607.09c	SPCC736.13	btn1	SPCC736.13	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593961	2543645	2539059	280059	275632	SPAC607.09c	SPCC737.06c	btn1	SPCC737.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593962	2543645	2539414	280059	275979	SPAC607.09c	SPCC74.02c	btn1	ppn1	-	SPCC74.02c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593963	2543645	2539223	280059	275793	SPAC607.09c	SPCC757.05c	btn1	SPCC757.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593964	2543645	2539418	280059	275983	SPAC607.09c	SPCC757.07c	btn1	ctt1	-	cta1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593965	2543645	2539434	280059	275997	SPAC607.09c	SPCC757.09c	btn1	rnc1	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593966	2543645	2538825	280059	275406	SPAC607.09c	SPCC757.12	btn1	SPCC757.12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593967	2543645	2538693	280059	275278	SPAC607.09c	SPCC777.03c	btn1	SPCC777.03c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593968	2543645	2539462	280059	276025	SPAC607.09c	SPCC777.13	btn1	vps35	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593969	2543645	2538996	280059	275570	SPAC607.09c	SPCC777.15	btn1	SPCC777.15	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593970	2543645	2539035	280059	275608	SPAC607.09c	SPCC794.09c	btn1	tef101	-	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593971	2543645	2539421	280059	275986	SPAC607.09c	SPCC794.11c	btn1	ent3	-	SPCC794.11c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593972	2543645	2539448	280059	276011	SPAC607.09c	SPCC825.04c	btn1	naa40	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593973	2543645	2539459	280059	276022	SPAC607.09c	SPCC825.05c	btn1	pwi1	-	SPCC825.05c	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593974	2543645	2539497	280059	276060	SPAC607.09c	SPCC895.07	btn1	alp14	-	mtc1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593975	2543645	2539263	280059	275833	SPAC607.09c	SPCC895.09c	btn1	ucp12	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593976	2543645	2539588	280059	276146	SPAC607.09c	SPCC962.04	btn1	rps1201	-	rps12|rps12-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593977	2543645	2538883	280059	275461	SPAC607.09c	SPCC970.05	btn1	rpl3601	-	rpl36-1	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593978	2543645	2539473	280059	276036	SPAC607.09c	SPCP25A2.02c	btn1	rhp26	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593979	2543645	2539544	280059	276105	SPAC607.09c	SPCP31B10.07	btn1	eft202	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593980	2543645	2538973	280059	275547	SPAC607.09c	SPCPB16A4.02c	btn1	SPCPB16A4.02c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593981	2543645	2539569	280059	276129	SPAC607.09c	SPCPB16A4.03c	btn1	ade10	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593982	2543645	2539574	280059	276134	SPAC607.09c	SPCPB16A4.04c	btn1	trm8	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593983	2543645	2538808	280059	275389	SPAC607.09c	SPCPB16A4.05c	btn1	SPCPB16A4.05c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593984	2543645	2539492	280059	276055	SPAC607.09c	SPCPB16A4.06c	btn1	SPCPB16A4.06c	-	-	Positive Genetic	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	colony size	-	-	BIOGRID
2593985	2543645	2539206	280059	275776	SPAC607.09c	SPCC24B10.07	btn1	gad8	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vacuolar morphology:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2593986	2543645	2541612	280059	278109	SPAC607.09c	SPAC1F7.04	btn1	rho1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	utilization of carbon source:wild type|vacuolar morphology:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2593987	2543645	2542013	280059	278496	SPAC607.09c	SPAC20H4.11c	btn1	rho5	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vacuolar morphology:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2593988	2543645	2540019	280059	276563	SPAC607.09c	SPBC1685.01	btn1	pmp1	-	dsp1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vacuolar morphology	-	-	BIOGRID
2593989	2543645	2541612	280059	278109	SPAC607.09c	SPAC1F7.04	btn1	rho1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	utilization of nitrogen source:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2593990	2543645	2542013	280059	278496	SPAC607.09c	SPAC20H4.11c	btn1	rho5	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	utilization of nitrogen source:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2593991	2543645	2540853	280059	277370	SPAC607.09c	SPBC428.16c	btn1	rhb1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bond ME (2015)	28357272	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	utilization of carbon source:wild type|vacuolar morphology:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2594001	2540604	2541974	277130	278459	SPBC25D12.05	SPAC23A1.12c	trm1	frs1	-	frs2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Han L (2018)	29596413	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2594002	2540604	2543647	277130	280061	SPBC25D12.05	SPAC3G9.06	trm1	frs2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Han L (2018)	29596413	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2594003	2541672	2542912	278168	279355	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC1071.07c	lsk1	rps1502	-	rps15|rps15-2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594004	2541672	2542961	278168	279401	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC10F6.16	lsk1	mug134	-	igo1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594005	2541672	2541628	278168	278124	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC110.02	lsk1	pds5	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594006	2541672	3361561	278168	280637	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC11E3.01c	lsk1	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594007	2541672	2541818	278168	278309	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC11G7.02	lsk1	pub1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594008	2541672	2542854	278168	279300	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC144.02	lsk1	iec1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594009	2541672	2541698	278168	278194	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC1556.05c	lsk1	cgr1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594010	2541672	2542749	278168	279199	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC15A10.03c	lsk1	rad54	-	rhp54	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594011	2541672	2542307	278168	278774	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC16A10.03c	lsk1	SPAC16A10.03c	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594012	2541672	2542338	278168	278804	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC16E8.01	lsk1	shd1	-	sla1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594013	2541672	2542349	278168	278814	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC1782.05	lsk1	ypa2	-	SPAC1782.05|pta2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594014	2541672	2542368	278168	278832	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC1783.06c	lsk1	atg12	-	apg12	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594015	2541672	2542170	278168	278645	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC17G8.13c	lsk1	mst2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594016	2541672	2542564	278168	279020	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC1851.03	lsk1	ckb1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594017	2541672	2542182	278168	278657	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC19B12.08	lsk1	atg4	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594018	2541672	2542420	278168	278883	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC19D5.03	lsk1	cid1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594019	2541672	2543327	278168	279750	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC1D4.06c	lsk1	csk1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594020	2541672	2541605	278168	278102	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC1F7.01c	lsk1	spt6	-	SPAC694.07c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594021	2541672	2541891	278168	278381	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC1F8.03c	lsk1	str3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594022	2541672	2541913	278168	278403	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC227.04	lsk1	atg10	-	SPAC227.04	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594023	2541672	2541675	278168	278171	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC22F8.12c	lsk1	shf1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594024	2541672	2542061	278168	278539	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC23C11.10	lsk1	mpn1	-	SPAC23C11.10|usb1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594025	2541672	2541624	278168	278120	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC23C11.15	lsk1	pst2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594026	2541672	2541945	278168	278432	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC23C4.06c	lsk1	SPAC23C4.06c	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594027	2541672	2541496	278168	277998	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC23D3.09	lsk1	arp42	-	arp4	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594028	2541672	2541518	278168	278019	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC23E2.03c	lsk1	ste7	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594029	2541672	2541691	278168	278187	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC25A8.02	lsk1	atg14	-	SPAC25A8.02	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594030	2541672	2542735	278168	279185	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC25B8.18	lsk1	SPAC25B8.18	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594031	2541672	2542723	278168	279174	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC25H1.03	lsk1	atg101	-	mug66	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594032	2541672	2541708	278168	278203	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC31A2.02	lsk1	trm112	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594033	2541672	2543198	278168	279627	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC31A2.11c	lsk1	cuf1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594034	2541672	2542474	278168	278934	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC31G5.09c	lsk1	spk1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594035	2541672	2543084	278168	279517	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC31G5.19	lsk1	abo1	-	SPAC31G5.19	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594036	2541672	2543443	278168	279863	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC3H1.12c	lsk1	snt2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594037	2541672	2543637	278168	280051	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC3H8.02	lsk1	csr102	-	SPAC3H8.02	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594038	2541672	2543633	278168	280047	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC3H8.05c	lsk1	mms1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594039	2541672	2543338	278168	279761	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC458.06	lsk1	atg1803	-	SPAC458.06|atg18|atg18c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594040	2541672	2543616	278168	280030	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC4A8.09c	lsk1	cwf21	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594041	2541672	2543529	278168	279947	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC4C5.02c	lsk1	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594042	2541672	2543619	278168	280033	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC4F10.04	lsk1	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594043	2541672	2543425	278168	279845	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC4F10.07c	lsk1	atg13	-	apg13|mug78	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594044	2541672	2543395	278168	279817	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC4G9.13c	lsk1	vps26	-	pep8	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594045	2541672	2542180	278168	278655	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC589.07c	lsk1	atg1801	-	atg18|atg18a	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594046	2541672	2543426	278168	279846	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC631.02	lsk1	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594047	2541672	2543336	278168	279759	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC688.11	lsk1	end4	-	sla2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594048	2541672	2541735	278168	278229	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC7D4.04	lsk1	atg11	-	taf1|cvt9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594049	2541672	2541761	278168	278255	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC7D4.12c	lsk1	SPAC7D4.12c	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594050	2541672	2543297	278168	279722	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC823.16c	lsk1	atg1802	-	mug179|atg18b|atg18	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594051	2541672	2542981	278168	279419	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC824.02	lsk1	bst1	-	SPAC824.02	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594052	2541672	2542845	278168	279291	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC824.04	lsk1	SPAC824.04	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594053	2541672	2543293	278168	279718	SPAC2F3.15	SPAPJ698.02c	lsk1	rps002	-	rps0|rps0-2|rpsa-2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594054	2541672	2540206	278168	276739	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC1271.12	lsk1	kes1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594055	2541672	2539845	278168	276393	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC12C2.02c	lsk1	ste20	-	ste16	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594056	2541672	2539775	278168	276326	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC14C8.17c	lsk1	spt8	-	sep9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594057	2541672	2539863	278168	276410	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC14F5.03c	lsk1	kap123	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594058	2541672	2539850	278168	276398	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC15D4.07c	lsk1	atg9	-	apg9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594059	2541672	2539928	278168	276472	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC1604.08c	lsk1	imp1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594060	2541672	3361342	278168	280418	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC16D10.07c	lsk1	sir2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594061	2541672	2540120	278168	276657	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC1703.12	lsk1	ubp9	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594062	2541672	2539739	278168	276291	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC1711.03	lsk1	aim27	-	emc3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594063	2541672	2539801	278168	276351	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC1778.01c	lsk1	zuo1	-	SPBC30D10.01|mpp11	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594064	2541672	2540788	278168	277307	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC18H10.06c	lsk1	swd2	-	swd2.1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594065	2541672	2540836	278168	277354	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC18H10.19	lsk1	vps38	-	atg14	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594066	2541672	2540787	278168	277306	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC1921.07c	lsk1	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594067	2541672	2540683	278168	277208	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC19G7.04	lsk1	SPBC19G7.04	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594068	2541672	2540673	278168	277198	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC1D7.03	lsk1	mug80	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594069	2541672	2540612	278168	277138	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC1D7.05	lsk1	byr2	-	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594070	2541672	2540760	278168	277280	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC21.05c	lsk1	ral2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594071	2541672	2540501	278168	277029	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC27B12.11c	lsk1	pho7	-	SPBC27B12.11c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594072	2541672	2540436	278168	276964	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC28F2.10c	lsk1	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594073	2541672	2540318	278168	276848	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC30B4.04c	lsk1	sol1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594074	2541672	2540273	278168	276804	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC30D10.13c	lsk1	pdb1	-	agg1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594075	2541672	2540219	278168	276752	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC31F10.13c	lsk1	hip1	-	hir1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594076	2541672	2540230	278168	276762	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC32F12.05c	lsk1	cwf12	-	isy1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594077	2541672	2540979	278168	277495	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC3H7.10	lsk1	elp6	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594078	2541672	2540749	278168	277271	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC4B4.03	lsk1	rsc1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594079	2541672	2540999	278168	277515	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC4B4.04	lsk1	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594080	2541672	2540814	278168	277333	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC4B4.10c	lsk1	atg5	-	mug77	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594081	2541672	2541101	278168	277616	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC609.02	lsk1	ptn1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594082	2541672	2540821	278168	277339	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC800.03	lsk1	clr3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594083	2541672	2541282	278168	277795	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC902.03	lsk1	SPBC902.03	-	psp7	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594084	2541672	2541255	278168	277769	SPAC2F3.15	SPBC947.02	lsk1	apl2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594085	2541672	2538987	278168	275561	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC11E10.06c	lsk1	elp4	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594086	2541672	2539050	278168	275623	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC11E10.08	lsk1	rik1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594087	2541672	2538701	278168	275286	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC1235.09	lsk1	hif2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594088	2541672	2538955	278168	275529	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC1450.02	lsk1	bdf1	-	SPCC191.13|brf1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594089	2541672	2539156	278168	275728	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC1450.08c	lsk1	wtf16	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594090	2541672	2539392	278168	275957	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC1795.06	lsk1	map2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594091	2541672	2539207	278168	275777	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC285.09c	lsk1	cgs2	-	pde1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594092	2541672	2539179	278168	275750	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC31H12.05c	lsk1	sds21	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594093	2541672	2538706	278168	275290	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC338.08	lsk1	ctp1	-	mug38|nip1|slr9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594094	2541672	2539527	278168	276089	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC338.16	lsk1	pof3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594095	2541672	2538965	278168	275539	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC417.09c	lsk1	SPCC417.09c	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594096	2541672	2539293	278168	275861	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC553.08c	lsk1	ria1	-	SPCC553.08c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594097	2541672	2539408	278168	275973	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC576.12c	lsk1	mhf2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594098	2541672	2538918	278168	275495	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC736.06	lsk1	SPCC736.06	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594099	2541672	2539552	278168	276113	SPAC2F3.15	SPCPJ732.01	lsk1	vps5	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA	-	BIOGRID
2594100	2540292	2542912	276823	279355	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC1071.07c	rpb1	rps1502	-	rps15|rps15-2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594101	2540292	2542961	276823	279401	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC10F6.16	rpb1	mug134	-	igo1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594102	2540292	3361561	276823	280637	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC11E3.01c	rpb1	swr1	-	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594103	2540292	2541818	276823	278309	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC11G7.02	rpb1	pub1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594104	2540292	2541768	276823	278262	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC11G7.04	rpb1	ubi1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594105	2540292	2541956	276823	278443	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC139.03	rpb1	toe2	-	SPAC139.03	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594106	2540292	2542826	276823	279273	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC13G6.09	rpb1	SPAC13G6.09	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594107	2540292	2542895	276823	279339	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC13G6.10c	rpb1	asl1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594108	2540292	2542854	276823	279300	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC144.02	rpb1	iec1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594109	2540292	2542307	276823	278774	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC16A10.03c	rpb1	SPAC16A10.03c	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594110	2540292	2542358	276823	278823	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC1782.09c	rpb1	clp1	-	flp1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594111	2540292	2542368	276823	278832	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC1783.06c	rpb1	atg12	-	apg12	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594112	2540292	2542170	276823	278645	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC17G8.13c	rpb1	mst2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594113	2540292	2542235	276823	278707	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC18G6.05c	rpb1	SPAC18G6.05c	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594114	2540292	2542420	276823	278883	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC19D5.03	rpb1	cid1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594115	2540292	2543327	276823	279750	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC1D4.06c	rpb1	csk1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594116	2540292	2541605	276823	278102	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC1F7.01c	rpb1	spt6	-	SPAC694.07c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594117	2540292	2541891	276823	278381	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC1F8.03c	rpb1	str3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594118	2540292	2541741	276823	278235	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC20G4.02c	rpb1	fus1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594119	2540292	2542007	276823	278490	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC20H4.07	rpb1	rad57	-	rhp57|SPAC145.01	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594120	2540292	2541913	276823	278403	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC227.04	rpb1	atg10	-	SPAC227.04	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594121	2540292	2541675	276823	278171	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC22F8.12c	rpb1	shf1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594122	2540292	2541742	276823	278236	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC22H10.09	rpb1	SPAC22H10.09	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594123	2540292	2541624	276823	278120	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC23C11.15	rpb1	pst2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594124	2540292	2541945	276823	278432	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC23C4.06c	rpb1	SPAC23C4.06c	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594125	2540292	2541496	276823	277998	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC23D3.09	rpb1	arp42	-	arp4	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594126	2540292	2541840	276823	278331	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC23H3.03c	rpb1	npr2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594127	2540292	2541691	276823	278187	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC25A8.02	rpb1	atg14	-	SPAC25A8.02	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594128	2540292	2542735	276823	279185	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC25B8.18	rpb1	SPAC25B8.18	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594129	2540292	2542723	276823	279174	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC25H1.03	rpb1	atg101	-	mug66	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594130	2540292	2542722	276823	279173	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC25H1.05	rpb1	meu29	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594131	2540292	2541591	276823	278088	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC26A3.07c	rpb1	rpl1101	-	rpl11|rpl11-1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594132	2540292	2542075	276823	278552	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC27D7.06	rpb1	etf1	-	SPAC27D7.06	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594133	2540292	2542643	276823	279097	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC2C4.07c	rpb1	dis32	-	SPAC2C4.07c|dis3L2	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594134	2540292	2542458	276823	278919	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC30.02c	rpb1	SPAC30.02c	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594135	2540292	2541708	276823	278203	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC31A2.02	rpb1	trm112	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594136	2540292	2542474	276823	278934	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC31G5.09c	rpb1	spk1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594137	2540292	2543084	276823	279517	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC31G5.19	rpb1	abo1	-	SPAC31G5.19	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594138	2540292	2543208	276823	279637	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC328.04	rpb1	SPAC328.04	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594139	2540292	2542567	276823	279023	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC328.05	rpb1	SPAC328.05	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594140	2540292	2543685	276823	280099	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC3C7.03c	rpb1	rad55	-	rhp55	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594141	2540292	2543443	276823	279863	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC3H1.12c	rpb1	snt2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594142	2540292	2543637	276823	280051	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC3H8.02	rpb1	csr102	-	SPAC3H8.02	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594143	2540292	2543633	276823	280047	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC3H8.05c	rpb1	mms1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594144	2540292	2543617	276823	280031	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC4A8.10	rpb1	SPAC4A8.10	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594145	2540292	2543529	276823	279947	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC4C5.02c	rpb1	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594146	2540292	2542969	276823	279409	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC4G8.10	rpb1	gos1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594147	2540292	2543395	276823	279817	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC4G9.13c	rpb1	vps26	-	pep8	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594148	2540292	2543402	276823	279824	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC630.14c	rpb1	tup12	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594149	2540292	2543426	276823	279846	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC631.02	rpb1	bdf2	-	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594150	2540292	2541735	276823	278229	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC7D4.04	rpb1	atg11	-	taf1|cvt9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594151	2540292	2542981	276823	279419	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC824.02	rpb1	bst1	-	SPAC824.02	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594152	2540292	2542845	276823	279291	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC824.04	rpb1	SPAC824.04	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594153	2540292	2542759	276823	279209	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC9G1.07	rpb1	SPAC9G1.07	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594154	2540292	2542193	276823	278668	SPBC28F2.12	SPAC9G1.11c	rpb1	spn4	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594155	2540292	2540061	276823	276599	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC119.12	rpb1	rud3	-	SPBC119.12	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594156	2540292	2539845	276823	276393	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC12C2.02c	rpb1	ste20	-	ste16	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594157	2540292	2539863	276823	276410	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC14F5.03c	rpb1	kap123	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594158	2540292	2539850	276823	276398	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC15D4.07c	rpb1	atg9	-	apg9	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594159	2540292	2539928	276823	276472	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC1604.08c	rpb1	imp1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594160	2540292	2539979	276823	276523	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC16A3.17c	rpb1	SPBC16A3.17c	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594161	2540292	3361342	276823	280418	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC16D10.07c	rpb1	sir2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594162	2540292	2540026	276823	276570	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC16D10.08c	rpb1	hsp104	-	SPBC16D10.08c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594163	2540292	2539392	276823	275957	SPBC28F2.12	SPCC1795.06	rpb1	map2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594164	2540292	2540137	276823	276674	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC1773.12	rpb1	SPBC1773.12	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594165	2540292	2539714	276823	276267	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC1861.07	rpb1	SPBC1861.07	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594166	2540292	2540788	276823	277307	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC18H10.06c	rpb1	swd2	-	swd2.1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594167	2540292	2540836	276823	277354	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC18H10.19	rpb1	vps38	-	atg14	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594168	2540292	2540787	276823	277306	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC1921.07c	rpb1	sgf29	-	SPBC21D10.13	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594169	2540292	2540714	276823	277237	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC19C2.04c	rpb1	ubp11	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594170	2540292	2540683	276823	277208	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC19G7.04	rpb1	SPBC19G7.04	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594171	2540292	2540673	276823	277198	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC1D7.03	rpb1	mug80	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594172	2540292	2540612	276823	277138	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC1D7.05	rpb1	byr2	-	SPBC2F12.01|ste8	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594173	2540292	2540760	276823	277280	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC21.05c	rpb1	ral2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594174	2540292	2540719	276823	277242	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC216.05	rpb1	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594175	2540292	2540309	276823	276839	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC21B10.13c	rpb1	yox1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594176	2540292	2540518	276823	277046	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC21H7.04	rpb1	dbp7	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594177	2540292	2540635	276823	277161	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC23G7.08c	rpb1	rga7	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594178	2540292	2540619	276823	277145	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC25H2.15	rpb1	SPBC25H2.15	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594179	2540292	2540316	276823	276846	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC27B12.08	rpb1	sip1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594180	2540292	2540501	276823	277029	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC27B12.11c	rpb1	pho7	-	SPBC27B12.11c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594181	2540292	2540436	276823	276964	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC28F2.10c	rpb1	ngg1	-	ada3|kap1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594182	2540292	2540354	276823	276883	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC29A3.13	rpb1	pdp1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594183	2540292	2540364	276823	276893	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC29B5.02c	rpb1	isp4	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594184	2540292	2540346	276823	276875	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC2F12.03c	rpb1	ebs1	-	SPBC2F12.03c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594185	2540292	2540351	276823	276880	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC2G2.10c	rpb1	mug110	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594186	2540292	2540318	276823	276848	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC30B4.04c	rpb1	sol1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594187	2540292	2540219	276823	276752	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC31F10.13c	rpb1	hip1	-	hir1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594188	2540292	2540230	276823	276762	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC32F12.05c	rpb1	cwf12	-	isy1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594189	2540292	2540263	276823	276794	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC32H8.02c	rpb1	nep2	-	mug120|pi021|SPACTOKYO_453.14c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594190	2540292	2540994	276823	277510	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC337.11	rpb1	SPBC337.11	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594191	2540292	2540967	276823	277483	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC36B7.08c	rpb1	SPBC36B7.08c	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594192	2540292	2540133	276823	276670	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC3B8.02	rpb1	php5	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594193	2540292	2541012	276823	277527	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC3H7.12	rpb1	rav2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594194	2540292	2540749	276823	277271	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC4B4.03	rpb1	rsc1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594195	2540292	2540999	276823	277515	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC4B4.04	rpb1	SPBC4B4.04	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594196	2540292	2540814	276823	277333	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC4B4.10c	rpb1	atg5	-	mug77	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594197	2540292	2541101	276823	277616	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC609.02	rpb1	ptn1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594198	2540292	2541140	276823	277655	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC713.07c	rpb1	SPBC713.07c	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594199	2540292	2541183	276823	277697	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC725.14	rpb1	arg6	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594200	2540292	2540821	276823	277339	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC800.03	rpb1	clr3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594201	2540292	2541250	276823	277764	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC8D2.17	rpb1	gmh4	-	SPBC8D2.17	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594202	2540292	2541282	276823	277795	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC902.03	rpb1	SPBC902.03	-	psp7	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594203	2540292	2541255	276823	277769	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC947.02	rpb1	apl2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594204	2540292	2539811	276823	276361	SPBC28F2.12	SPBP4H10.03	rpb1	oxa102	-	oxa1|oxa1-2|oxa1sp2|SPBC1346.02c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594205	2540292	2538987	276823	275561	SPBC28F2.12	SPCC11E10.06c	rpb1	elp4	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594206	2540292	2539050	276823	275623	SPBC28F2.12	SPCC11E10.08	rpb1	rik1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594207	2540292	2538701	276823	275286	SPBC28F2.12	SPCC1235.09	rpb1	hif2	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594208	2540292	2538724	276823	275308	SPBC28F2.12	SPCC1442.01	rpb1	ste6	-	SPCC1450.17	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594209	2540292	2538955	276823	275529	SPBC28F2.12	SPCC1450.02	rpb1	bdf1	-	SPCC191.13|brf1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594210	2540292	2539153	276823	275725	SPBC28F2.12	SPCC1682.01	rpb1	qcr9	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594211	2540292	2539352	276823	275918	SPBC28F2.12	SPCC188.07	rpb1	ccq1	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594212	2540292	2539207	276823	275777	SPBC28F2.12	SPCC285.09c	rpb1	cgs2	-	pde1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594213	2540292	2538932	276823	275508	SPBC28F2.12	SPCC31H12.03c	rpb1	tho1	-	SPCC31H12.03c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594214	2540292	2539527	276823	276089	SPBC28F2.12	SPCC338.16	rpb1	pof3	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594215	2540292	2538965	276823	275539	SPBC28F2.12	SPCC417.09c	rpb1	SPCC417.09c	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594216	2540292	2539484	276823	276047	SPBC28F2.12	SPCC594.04c	rpb1	SPCC594.04c	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594217	2540292	2539421	276823	275986	SPBC28F2.12	SPCC794.11c	rpb1	ent3	-	SPCC794.11c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594218	2540292	2539497	276823	276060	SPBC28F2.12	SPCC895.07	rpb1	alp14	-	mtc1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594219	2540292	2539552	276823	276113	SPBC28F2.12	SPCPJ732.01	rpb1	vps5	-	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594220	2540292	2539739	276823	276291	SPBC28F2.12	SPBC1711.03	rpb1	aim27	-	emc3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	viability	SGA|rpb1-S2A allele	-	BIOGRID
2594221	2541672	2543643	278168	280057	SPAC2F3.15	SPAC3G9.07c	lsk1	hos2	-	hda1|phd1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2594222	2541672	2538762	278168	275345	SPAC2F3.15	SPCC306.04c	lsk1	set1	-	kmt2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue	deletion of set1 suppressed the sterility of the lsk1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
2594223	2538762	2540292	275345	276823	SPCC306.04c	SPBC28F2.12	set1	rpb1	kmt2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2594224	2541652	2541672	278148	278168	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC2F3.15	sty1	lsk1	phh1|spc1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Materne P (2015)	26098123	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2594225	2540281	2542544	276812	279001	SPBC2G2.14	SPAC18G6.10	csi1	lem2	SPBC2G2.14	heh1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Fernandez-Alvarez A (2017)	28678660	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	-	-	BIOGRID
2594226	2539540	14218174	276102	4254536	SPCC736.12c	SPAC19G12.17	mmi1	erh1	-	new10|iss6	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Simonetti F (2017)	28841135	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2594227	2539540	2542001	276102	278485	SPCC736.12c	SPAC20G8.06	mmi1	not1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Simonetti F (2017)	28841135	284812	284812	High Throughput|Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2594228	2539540	2538913	276102	275490	SPCC736.12c	SPCC31H12.08c	mmi1	ccr4	-	SPCC5E4.02c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Simonetti F (2017)	28841135	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2594229	2539540	2539041	276102	275614	SPCC736.12c	SPCC18.06c	mmi1	caf1	-	pop2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Simonetti F (2017)	28841135	284812	284812	High Throughput|Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2594230	2539540	2542325	276102	278791	SPCC736.12c	SPAC16C9.04c	mmi1	mot2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Simonetti F (2017)	28841135	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2594231	2539540	2538778	276102	275359	SPCC736.12c	SPCC4G3.15c	mmi1	not2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Simonetti F (2017)	28841135	284812	284812	High Throughput|Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2594232	2539540	2542126	276102	278602	SPCC736.12c	SPAC1B3.05	mmi1	not3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Simonetti F (2017)	28841135	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2594233	2539540	2542094	276102	278571	SPCC736.12c	SPAC29B12.06c	mmi1	rcd1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Simonetti F (2017)	28841135	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2594234	2539540	2542173	276102	278648	SPCC736.12c	SPAC17H9.02	mmi1	mtl1	-	SPAC17H9.02	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Simonetti F (2017)	28841135	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2594235	2539540	2543254	276102	279682	SPCC736.12c	SPAC1006.03c	mmi1	red1	-	iss3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Simonetti F (2017)	28841135	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2594236	2539540	2541655	276102	278151	SPCC736.12c	SPAC7D4.14c	mmi1	iss10	-	SPAC7D4.14c|pir1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Simonetti F (2017)	28841135	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2594237	2539540	2541281	276102	277794	SPCC736.12c	SPBC902.04	mmi1	rmn1	-	SPBC902.04	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Simonetti F (2017)	28841135	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2594238	2539540	2541143	276102	277658	SPCC736.12c	SPBC725.08	mmi1	pir2	-	SPBC725.08|ars2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Simonetti F (2017)	28841135	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2594239	2539540	2540291	276102	276822	SPCC736.12c	SPBC337.12	mmi1	red5	-	SPBC337.12	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Simonetti F (2017)	28841135	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2594240	2539540	2542080	276102	278557	SPCC736.12c	SPAC27D7.03c	mmi1	mei2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Simonetti F (2017)	28841135	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2594241	2542325	2542080	278791	278557	SPAC16C9.04c	SPAC27D7.03c	mot2	mei2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Simonetti F (2017)	28841135	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2594245	2542239	2540735	278711	277258	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC83.03c	chp1	tas3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Upadhyay U (2017)	28228545	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2596545	2541257	2539104	277771	275676	SPBP23A10.14c	SPCC1223.10c	ell1	eaf1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sweta K (2017)	29043956	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2596546	2541652	2543666	278148	280080	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC644.06c	sty1	cdr1	phh1|spc1	nim1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Opalko HE (2017)	28924043	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2596547	2540601	2538930	277127	275506	SPBC29A3.14c	SPCC188.13c	trt1	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Begnis M (2018)	29654060	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2596548	2540601	2539403	277127	275968	SPBC29A3.14c	SPCC736.11	trt1	ago1	-	csp9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Begnis M (2018)	29654060	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2596549	2539540	2539540	276102	276102	SPCC736.12c	SPCC736.12c	mmi1	mmi1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Shichino Y (2018)	29424342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2596550	2539540	2539540	276102	276102	SPCC736.12c	SPCC736.12c	mmi1	mmi1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Shichino Y (2018)	29424342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2596551	2539540	2543254	276102	279682	SPCC736.12c	SPAC1006.03c	mmi1	red1	-	iss3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Shichino Y (2018)	29424342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2596552	2539540	14218174	276102	4254536	SPCC736.12c	SPAC19G12.17	mmi1	erh1	-	new10|iss6	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Shichino Y (2018)	29424342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2596553	2539540	14218174	276102	4254536	SPCC736.12c	SPAC19G12.17	mmi1	erh1	-	new10|iss6	Co-localization	physical	Shichino Y (2018)	29424342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2596554	14218174	2540241	4254536	276773	SPAC19G12.17	SPBC32H8.11	erh1	mei4	new10|iss6	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Shichino Y (2018)	29424342	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2596555	2541187	5802702	277701	857840	SPBC776.14	SPCC1235.15	plh1	dga1	-	SPCC548.01	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Peter M (2017)	28282432	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chemical compound accumulation|stress resistance	-	-	BIOGRID
2596556	2541959	2541628	278446	278124	SPAC23C4.03	SPAC110.02	hrk1	pds5	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Goto Y (2017)	28343969	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2596557	2541959	2541628	278446	278124	SPAC23C4.03	SPAC110.02	hrk1	pds5	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Goto Y (2017)	28343969	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2596564	2539666	2540860	276221	277377	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC428.17c	eso1	wpl1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Goto Y (2017)	28343969	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2596565	2539666	2541628	276221	278124	SPBC16A3.11	SPAC110.02	eso1	pds5	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Goto Y (2017)	28343969	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2596566	2540860	2541628	277377	278124	SPBC428.17c	SPAC110.02	wpl1	pds5	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Goto Y (2017)	28343969	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2596567	2538740	3361531	275323	280607	SPCC794.08	SPAC343.19	efr3	lsb6	SPCC794.08	SPAC824.01	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Snider CE (2018)	29975157	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution	-	-	BIOGRID
2596604	2540640	2540640	277165	277165	SPBC1A4.06c	SPBC1A4.06c	tam41	tam41	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Jiao H (2019)	31178220	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2596605	2540640	2540640	277165	277165	SPBC1A4.06c	SPBC1A4.06c	tam41	tam41	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Jiao H (2019)	31178220	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2596640	2543339	2540720	279762	277243	SPAC630.13c	SPBC216.07c	tsc2	tor2	-	SPBC646.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakase Y (2018)	30301783	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	Figure 1|tor2-ts10 suppresses expression of Tf2 retrotransposons in tsc2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
2596641	2543339	2539207	279762	275777	SPAC630.13c	SPCC285.09c	tsc2	cgs2	-	pde1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakase Y (2018)	30301783	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	Figure 2|cgs2+ overexpression suppresses expression of Tf2 retrotransposons in tsc2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
2596642	2540853	2539207	277370	275777	SPBC428.16c	SPCC285.09c	rhb1	cgs2	-	pde1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakase Y (2018)	30301783	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	Figure 2|cgs2+ overexpression suppresses expression of Tf2 retrotransposons in rhb1-DA4 mutant	-	BIOGRID
2596643	2540853	2539207	277370	275777	SPBC428.16c	SPCC285.09c	rhb1	cgs2	-	pde1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nakase Y (2018)	30301783	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 2|cgs2+ overexpression suppresses growth defect of rhb1-DA4 mutant on canavanine	-	BIOGRID
2596644	2543339	2539207	279762	275777	SPAC630.13c	SPCC285.09c	tsc2	cgs2	-	pde1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nakase Y (2018)	30301783	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 2|cgs2+ overexpression suppresses growth defect of tsc2 mutant on canavanine	-	BIOGRID
2596645	2540853	2539781	277370	276331	SPBC428.16c	SPBC106.10	rhb1	pka1	-	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakase Y (2018)	30301783	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	Figure 3|pka1 deletion suppresses expression of Tf2 retrotransposons in rhb1-DA4 mutant	-	BIOGRID
2596646	2543339	2539781	279762	276331	SPAC630.13c	SPBC106.10	tsc2	pka1	-	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakase Y (2018)	30301783	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	Figure 3|pka1 deletion suppresses expression of Tf2 retrotransposons in tsc2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
2596647	2543339	2540810	279762	277329	SPAC630.13c	SPBC19C7.03	tsc2	cyr1	-	git2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakase Y (2018)	30301783	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	Figure 3|cyr1 deletion suppresses expression of Tf2 retrotransposons in tsc2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
2596648	2539971	2540720	276515	277243	SPBC1105.04c	SPBC216.07c	cbp1	tor2	abp1	SPBC646.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakase Y (2018)	30301783	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation|protein/peptide distribution	Figure 5|tor2-ts10 mutation suppresses expression of Tf2 retrotransposons in abp1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
2596649	2539461	2539781	276024	276331	SPCC63.08c	SPBC106.10	atg1	pka1	cvt10|ppk36	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Nakase Y (2018)	30301783	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	Figure 7|pka1 deletion suppresses expression of Tf2 retrotransposons in atg1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
2596741	2540281	2540694	276812	277218	SPBC2G2.14	SPBC19C7.10	csi1	bqt4	SPBC2G2.14	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ebrahimi H (2018)	29722648	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution	Figure 3|Lem2 localization	-	BIOGRID
2596744	2540825	2540694	277343	277218	SPBC428.08c	SPBC19C7.10	clr4	bqt4	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ebrahimi H (2018)	29722648	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 5|MMS	-	BIOGRID
2596745	2542544	2538930	279001	275506	SPAC18G6.10	SPCC188.13c	lem2	dcr1	heh1	SPCC584.10c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ebrahimi H (2018)	29722648	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Figure 8	-	BIOGRID
2596746	2540694	2538930	277218	275506	SPBC19C7.10	SPCC188.13c	bqt4	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Ebrahimi H (2018)	29722648	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Figure 8	-	BIOGRID
2596747	2542703	2538875	279156	275454	SPAC26H5.06	SPCC962.02c	pot1	bir1	-	SPCP31B10.10c|cut17|pbh1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Habib AGK (2018)	29298360	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2596748	2542703	3361036	279156	280112	SPAC26H5.06	SPCC320.13c	pot1	ark1	-	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Habib AGK (2018)	29298360	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2596749	2542703	2540250	279156	276782	SPAC26H5.06	SPBC336.15	pot1	pic1	-	SPBC685.01	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Habib AGK (2018)	29298360	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2596750	2540601	2540250	277127	276782	SPBC29A3.14c	SPBC336.15	trt1	pic1	-	SPBC685.01	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Habib AGK (2018)	29298360	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2596751	2542703	2542788	279156	279237	SPAC26H5.06	SPAC15A10.15	pot1	sgo2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Habib AGK (2018)	29298360	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance|protein/peptide distribution	-	-	BIOGRID
2596752	2542703	2541633	279156	278129	SPAC26H5.06	SPAC664.01c	pot1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Habib AGK (2018)	29298360	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance|protein/peptide distribution	-	-	BIOGRID
2597024	2542805	2542805	279253	279253	SPAC15A10.08	SPAC15A10.08	ain1	ain1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Addario B (2016)	27069798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	dimer	-	BIOGRID
2597025	2539726	2540825	276278	277343	SPBC13E7.08c	SPBC428.08c	leo1	clr4	SPBC13E7.08c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Seo HD (2018)	29214404	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	-	-	BIOGRID
2597058	2538731	2540641	275315	277166	SPCC1393.10	SPBC23G7.16	ctr4	ctr6	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Plante S (2017)	28572514	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein activity	double mutants show a complete loss of SOD1 activity	-	BIOGRID
2597093	2541531	2539045	278031	275618	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1235.05c	fft3	fft2	snf2SR	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity|protein/peptide accumulation	-	-	BIOGRID
2597094	2541531	2541355	278031	277866	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP8B7.19	fft3	spt16	snf2SR	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2597096	2541531	2540292	278031	276823	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC28F2.12	fft3	rpb1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597097	2541531	2542467	278031	278928	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1834.04	fft3	hht1	snf2SR	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue	The H3/H4 double mutant mutation suppressed the cold-sensitive growth phenotype observed in fft3 mutant cells|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2597098	2541531	2542463	278031	278924	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1834.03c	fft3	hhf1	snf2SR	h4.1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue	The H3/H4 double mutant mutation suppressed the cold-sensitive growth phenotype observed in fft3 mutant cells|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2597099	2541531	2541200	278031	277714	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC8D2.03c	fft3	hhf2	snf2SR	ams3|h4.2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue	The H3/H4 double mutant mutation suppressed the cold-sensitive growth phenotype observed in fft3 mutant cells|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2597100	2541531	2542318	278031	278784	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC16C9.05	fft3	cph1	snf2SR	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue	The cph1 mutant mutation suppressed the cold-sensitive growth phenotype observed in fft3 mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
2597101	2541531	2541624	278031	278120	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC23C11.15	fft3	pst2	snf2SR	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue	The pst2 mutant suppressed the cold-sensitive growth phenotype observed in fft3 mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
2597102	2541531	2540866	278031	277383	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC4C3.12	fft3	sep1	snf2SR	SPBC4C3.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597103	2541531	2543269	278031	279697	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1002.09c	fft3	dld1	snf2SR	dldh	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597104	2541531	2543266	278031	279694	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1002.10c	fft3	sgt1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597105	2541531	2543256	278031	279684	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1006.01	fft3	psp3	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597106	2541531	2542948	278031	279388	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1006.07	fft3	SPAC1006.07	snf2SR	tif1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597107	2541531	2542664	278031	279117	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1071.10c	fft3	pma1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597108	2541531	2542931	278031	279372	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1071.11	fft3	SPAC1071.11	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597109	2541531	3361433	278031	280509	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1071.12c	fft3	stp1	snf2SR	SPAC926.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597110	2541531	3361401	278031	280477	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1093.03	fft3	SPAC1093.03	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597111	2541531	3361400	278031	280476	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1093.06c	fft3	dhc1	snf2SR	SPAC30C2.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597112	2541531	2542920	278031	279361	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC10F6.01c	fft3	sir1	snf2SR	SPAC4C5.05c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597113	2541531	2542937	278031	279378	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC10F6.03c	fft3	cts1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597114	2541531	2542934	278031	279375	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC10F6.07c	fft3	mug94	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597115	2541531	3361514	278031	280590	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC110.04c	fft3	pss1	snf2SR	SPAP14E8.01c|ssp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597116	2541531	2542666	278031	279119	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1142.04	fft3	SPAC1142.04	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597117	2541531	2542928	278031	279369	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1142.06	fft3	get3	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597118	2541531	2542922	278031	279363	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1142.07c	fft3	vps32	snf2SR	snf7	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597119	2541531	2541552	278031	278051	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1142.08	fft3	fhl1	snf2SR	SPAC8C9.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597120	2541531	2542990	278031	279428	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC11D3.16c	fft3	SPAC11D3.16c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597121	2541531	3361561	278031	280637	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC11E3.01c	fft3	swr1	snf2SR	SPAC2H10.03c|mod22	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597122	2541531	2542638	278031	279092	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1250.01	fft3	snf21	snf2SR	SPAC29A4.21|brg1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597123	2541531	2542950	278031	279390	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC12B10.03	fft3	bun62	snf2SR	wdr20	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597124	2541531	2543133	278031	279565	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC12G12.05c	fft3	taf9	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597125	2541531	2542964	278031	279404	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC12G12.07c	fft3	SPAC12G12.07c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597126	2541531	2542958	278031	279398	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC12G12.09	fft3	SPAC12G12.09	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597127	2541531	2542546	278031	279003	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1399.05c	fft3	toe1	snf2SR	SPAC1399.05c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597128	2541531	2542599	278031	279053	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC13A11.02c	fft3	erg11	snf2SR	cyp51	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597129	2541531	2542822	278031	279269	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC13F5.02c	fft3	ptr6	snf2SR	taf7	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597130	2541531	2542841	278031	279287	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC13F5.05	fft3	SPAC13F5.05	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597131	2541531	2542895	278031	279339	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC13G6.10c	fft3	asl1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597132	2541531	2542890	278031	279334	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC13G6.14	fft3	aps1	snf2SR	SPAC24B11.03	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597133	2541531	2542836	278031	279282	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC13G7.06	fft3	met16	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597134	2541531	2542869	278031	279314	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC140.02	fft3	gar2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597135	2541531	2542868	278031	279313	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1420.02c	fft3	cct5	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597136	2541531	2542854	278031	279300	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC144.02	fft3	iec1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597137	2541531	2542821	278031	279268	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC144.12	fft3	SPAC144.12	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597138	2541531	2542850	278031	279296	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC144.18	fft3	vrg4	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597139	2541531	2541428	278031	277933	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC14C4.11	fft3	SPAC14C4.11	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597140	2541531	2541645	278031	278141	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1527.03	fft3	SPAC1527.03	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597141	2541531	2541635	278031	278131	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1556.01c	fft3	rad50	snf2SR	SPAP4C9.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597142	2541531	2541690	278031	278186	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1556.02c	fft3	sdh1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597143	2541531	2542744	278031	279194	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1565.08	fft3	cdc48	snf2SR	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597144	2541531	2542772	278031	279221	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC16.02c	fft3	srp2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597145	2541531	3361541	278031	280617	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC167.05	fft3	SPAC167.05	snf2SR	SPAC57A7.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597146	2541531	2542753	278031	279203	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1687.09	fft3	SPAC1687.09	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597147	2541531	2541625	278031	278121	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1687.12c	fft3	coq4	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597148	2541531	2542318	278031	278784	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC16C9.05	fft3	cph1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597149	2541531	2542327	278031	278793	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC16C9.06c	fft3	upf1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597150	2541531	2541706	278031	278201	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC16E8.15	fft3	tif45	snf2SR	tif1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597151	2541531	2542347	278031	278812	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1751.03	fft3	SPAC1751.03	snf2SR	csn7|csn72|csn7b|SPAC31A2.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597152	2541531	3361455	278031	280531	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1782.01	fft3	ecm29	snf2SR	SPAPYUG7.07	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597153	2541531	2542369	278031	278833	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1782.10c	fft3	nhp2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597154	2541531	2542136	278031	278612	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC17A2.06c	fft3	vps8	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597155	2541531	2542252	278031	278722	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC17A2.13c	fft3	rad25	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597156	2541531	2542406	278031	278870	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC17A5.13	fft3	SPAC17A5.13	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597157	2541531	2542204	278031	278679	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC17A5.14	fft3	exo2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597158	2541531	2542408	278031	278872	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC17A5.15c	fft3	gus1	snf2SR	SPAC17A5.15c|ers1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597159	2541531	2542290	278031	278758	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC17C9.03	fft3	tif471	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597160	2541531	2542179	278031	278654	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC17C9.12	fft3	scs22	snf2SR	SPAC17C9.12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597161	2541531	2542264	278031	278733	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC17D4.04	fft3	trm401	snf2SR	SPAC17D4.04|SPAC458.01|trm4|trm4a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597162	2541531	2542400	278031	278864	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC17G6.10	fft3	ssr1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597163	2541531	2542433	278031	278895	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC17G6.14c	fft3	uap56	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597164	2541531	2542155	278031	278631	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC17G8.06c	fft3	SPAC17G8.06c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597165	2541531	2542293	278031	278761	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC17G8.14c	fft3	pck1	snf2SR	SPAC22H10.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597166	2541531	2542253	278031	278723	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC17H9.04c	fft3	SPAC17H9.04c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597167	2541531	2542246	278031	278716	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC17H9.12c	fft3	SPAC17H9.12c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597168	2541531	2542273	278031	278742	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC17H9.13c	fft3	SPAC17H9.13c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597169	2541531	2542385	278031	278849	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1805.02c	fft3	etf2	snf2SR	SPAC1805.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597170	2541531	2542294	278031	278762	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1805.09c	fft3	fmt1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597171	2541531	2542115	278031	278591	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1834.02	fft3	aro1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597172	2541531	2542463	278031	278924	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1834.03c	fft3	hhf1	snf2SR	h4.1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597173	2541531	2542467	278031	278928	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1834.04	fft3	hht1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597174	2541531	2542195	278031	278670	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1834.07	fft3	klp3	snf2SR	krp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597175	2541531	2542410	278031	278874	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1834.11c	fft3	sec18	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597176	2541531	2542560	278031	279016	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1851.02	fft3	slc1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597177	2541531	2542242	278031	278713	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC18G6.04c	fft3	shm2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597178	2541531	2542235	278031	278707	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC18G6.05c	fft3	SPAC18G6.05c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597179	2541531	2542521	278031	278979	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC18G6.12c	fft3	SPAC18G6.12c	snf2SR	B22918-1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597180	2541531	3361392	278031	280468	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1952.04c	fft3	SPAC1952.04c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597181	2541531	2542515	278031	278973	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1952.09c	fft3	SPAC1952.09c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597182	2541531	2542522	278031	278980	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC19A8.03	fft3	ymr1	snf2SR	SPAC19A8.03	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597183	2541531	2542469	278031	278930	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC19A8.04	fft3	erg5	snf2SR	cyp61	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597184	2541531	2542240	278031	278712	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC19A8.15	fft3	trp2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597185	2541531	2542565	278031	279021	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC19B12.09	fft3	srp14	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597186	2541531	2542537	278031	278994	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC19D5.04	fft3	ptr1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597187	2541531	2542226	278031	278699	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC19G12.06c	fft3	hta2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597188	2541531	2542465	278031	278926	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC19G12.10c	fft3	cpy1	snf2SR	pcy1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597189	2541531	2542608	278031	279062	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC19G12.12	fft3	dlp1	snf2SR	coq1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597190	2541531	2542231	278031	278704	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC19G12.14	fft3	its3	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597191	2541531	2542497	278031	278956	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1A6.04c	fft3	plb1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597192	2541531	2542539	278031	278996	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1B1.01	fft3	deb1	snf2SR	rdp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597193	2541531	2542533	278031	278991	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1B1.02c	fft3	SPAC1B1.02c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597194	2541531	2542496	278031	278955	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1B1.03c	fft3	kap95	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597195	2541531	2542126	278031	278602	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1B3.05	fft3	not3	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597196	2541531	2542233	278031	278705	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1B3.12c	fft3	rpb10	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597197	2541531	2542212	278031	278686	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1D4.04	fft3	cct2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597198	2541531	3361454	278031	280530	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1D4.14	fft3	tho2	snf2SR	SPAC22F3.14c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597199	2541531	2543630	278031	280044	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1F3.01	fft3	rrp6	snf2SR	SPAC3H8.11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597200	2541531	2541649	278031	278145	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1F3.06c	fft3	spo15	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597201	2541531	2541419	278031	277925	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1F3.07c	fft3	rsc58	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597202	2541531	2541461	278031	277963	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1F3.09	fft3	mug161	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597203	2541531	2541468	278031	277970	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1F5.09c	fft3	shk2	snf2SR	pak2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597204	2541531	2541612	278031	278109	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1F7.04	fft3	rho1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597205	2541531	2541695	278031	278191	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1F7.05	fft3	cdc22	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597206	2541531	2541854	278031	278345	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1F8.06	fft3	fta5	snf2SR	sma5|pfl8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597207	2541531	2541874	278031	278364	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC1F8.07c	fft3	SPAC1F8.07c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597208	2541531	2541741	278031	278235	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC20G4.02c	fft3	fus1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597209	2541531	2541849	278031	278340	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC20G8.01	fft3	cdc17	snf2SR	SPAC57A10.13c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597210	2541531	2541975	278031	278460	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC20G8.05c	fft3	cdc15	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597211	2541531	2542520	278031	278978	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC20G8.09c	fft3	nat10	snf2SR	SPAC20G8.09c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597212	2541531	2541941	278031	278428	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC20H4.03c	fft3	tfs1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597213	2541531	2542013	278031	278496	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC20H4.11c	fft3	rho5	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597214	2541531	2542047	278031	278528	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC21E11.03c	fft3	pcr1	snf2SR	mts2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597215	2541531	2542064	278031	278541	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC21E11.06	fft3	tif224	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597216	2541531	2541949	278031	278436	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC222.04c	fft3	ies6	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597217	2541531	2541927	278031	278415	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC222.12c	fft3	atp2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597218	2541531	2541948	278031	278435	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC222.13c	fft3	SPAC222.13c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597219	2541531	2541926	278031	278414	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC222.14c	fft3	SPAC222.14c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597220	2541531	2541519	278031	278020	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC227.07c	fft3	pab1	snf2SR	ret1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597221	2541531	2541500	278031	278002	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC227.18	fft3	lys3	snf2SR	SPAC2F7.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597222	2541531	2541437	278031	277942	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC22A12.09c	fft3	sap114	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597223	2541531	2541815	278031	278306	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC22A12.15c	fft3	bip1	snf2SR	bip	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597224	2541531	2541811	278031	278302	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC22A12.16	fft3	SPAC22A12.16	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597225	2541531	2541875	278031	278365	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC22F3.06c	fft3	lon1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597226	2541531	2541878	278031	278368	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC22F3.07c	fft3	atp20	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597227	2541531	2541716	278031	278211	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC22F8.02c	fft3	pvg5	snf2SR	mug50	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597228	2541531	2541545	278031	278045	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC22F8.07c	fft3	rtf1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597229	2541531	2541544	278031	278044	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC22G7.06c	fft3	ura1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597230	2541531	2541727	278031	278221	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC22H10.12c	fft3	gdi1	snf2SR	sec19	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597231	2541531	2541984	278031	278469	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC23A1.10	fft3	tef102	snf2SR	ef1a-b|ef1a-d|efa1|SPBC24E9.15c|tef1-b|tef1-d	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597232	2541531	2541974	278031	278459	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC23A1.12c	fft3	frs1	snf2SR	frs2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597233	2541531	2542019	278031	278502	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC23A1.17	fft3	SPAC23A1.17	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597234	2541531	2542011	278031	278494	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC23C11.05	fft3	ipp1	snf2SR	SPAC23C11.05|ppa|ppa1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597235	2541531	2541972	278031	278457	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC23C11.11	fft3	cka1	snf2SR	orb5	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597236	2541531	2541961	278031	278448	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC23C4.02	fft3	crn1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597237	2541531	2541954	278031	278441	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC23C4.05c	fft3	SPAC23C4.05c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597238	2541531	2541930	278031	278418	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC23C4.10	fft3	sec2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597239	2541531	2541910	278031	278400	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC23C4.15	fft3	rpb5	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597240	2541531	2541916	278031	278406	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC23C4.19	fft3	spt5	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597241	2541531	2541832	278031	278323	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC23E2.02	fft3	lsd2	snf2SR	saf140|swm2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597242	2541531	2541446	278031	277951	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC23G3.01	fft3	rpb2	snf2SR	SPAC521.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597243	2541531	2541424	278031	277929	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC23G3.04	fft3	ies4	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597244	2541531	2541814	278031	278305	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC23G3.06	fft3	SPAC23G3.06	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597245	2541531	2541438	278031	277943	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC23G3.10c	fft3	ssr3	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597246	2541531	2541807	278031	278298	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC23G3.11	fft3	rpn6	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597247	2541531	2541771	278031	278265	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC23H3.06	fft3	apl6	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597248	2541531	2541852	278031	278343	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC23H3.09c	fft3	gly1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597249	2541531	2541851	278031	278342	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC23H3.10	fft3	ssr2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597250	2541531	2541796	278031	278287	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC23H4.01c	fft3	osh3	snf2SR	SPAC23H4.01c|SPAP27G11.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597251	2541531	2541752	278031	278246	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC23H4.06	fft3	gln1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597252	2541531	2541858	278031	278348	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC23H4.12	fft3	alp13	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597253	2541531	2541652	278031	278148	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC24B11.06c	fft3	sty1	snf2SR	phh1|spc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597254	2541531	2541561	278031	278060	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC24B11.07c	fft3	SPAC24B11.07c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597255	2541531	2542651	278031	279105	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC24C9.12c	fft3	SPAC24C9.12c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597256	2541531	2541531	278031	278031	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC25A8.01c	fft3	fft3	snf2SR	snf2SR	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597257	2541531	2541578	278031	278075	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC25B8.05	fft3	deg1	snf2SR	SPAC25B8.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597258	2541531	2541548	278031	278048	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC25B8.16	fft3	pop100	snf2SR	SPAC25B8.16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597259	2541531	3361412	278031	280488	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC25G10.01	fft3	SPAC25G10.01	snf2SR	SPAC2C4.18	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597260	2541531	2542720	278031	279171	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC25G10.05c	fft3	his1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597261	2541531	2542090	278031	278567	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC25G10.08	fft3	SPAC25G10.08	snf2SR	p116	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597262	2541531	5802955	278031	858093	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC25G10.09c	fft3	pan1	snf2SR	SPAC27F1.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597263	2541531	2542078	278031	278555	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC26A3.05	fft3	chc1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597264	2541531	2542074	278031	278551	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC26A3.10	fft3	cnt6	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597265	2541531	2541579	278031	278076	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC26F1.03	fft3	pda1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597266	2541531	2542100	278031	278576	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC26F1.04c	fft3	etr1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597267	2541531	2542085	278031	278562	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC26F1.06	fft3	gpm1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597268	2541531	2542088	278031	278565	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC26F1.07	fft3	SPAC26F1.07	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597269	2541531	2542701	278031	279154	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC26H5.05	fft3	mga2	snf2SR	SPAC26H5.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597270	2541531	2542694	278031	279147	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC26H5.10c	fft3	tif51	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597271	2541531	2541617	278031	278114	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC27D7.04	fft3	omt2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597272	2541531	2542077	278031	278554	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC27D7.14c	fft3	tpr1	snf2SR	SPAC637.02c|ctr9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597273	2541531	2541619	278031	278116	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC27F1.09c	fft3	prp10	snf2SR	sap155|SF3b155	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597274	2541531	2542298	278031	278765	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC29A4.02c	fft3	SPAC29A4.02c	snf2SR	tef3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597275	2541531	2542481	278031	278941	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC29A4.04c	fft3	cbf5	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597276	2541531	2542163	278031	278639	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC29A4.15	fft3	SPAC29A4.15	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597277	2541531	2542804	278031	279252	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC29A4.16	fft3	hal4	snf2SR	ppk10|sat4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597278	2541531	2541614	278031	278111	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC29A4.20	fft3	elp3	snf2SR	kat9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597279	2541531	3361566	278031	280642	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC29B12.01	fft3	ino80	snf2SR	SPAC3G6.12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597280	2541531	2542070	278031	278547	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC29B12.02c	fft3	set2	snf2SR	kmt3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597281	2541531	2542678	278031	279131	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC29B12.07	fft3	sec16	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597282	2541531	2542669	278031	279122	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC29B12.08	fft3	clr5	snf2SR	SPAC29B12.08	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597283	2541531	2542813	278031	279260	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC29B12.11c	fft3	SPAC29B12.11c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597284	2541531	2542721	278031	279172	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC29E6.06c	fft3	SPAC29E6.06c	snf2SR	SPAC30.10c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597285	2541531	2541425	278031	277930	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC2C4.17c	fft3	msy2	snf2SR	SPAC2C4.17c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597286	2541531	2541888	278031	278378	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC2E12.02	fft3	hsf1	snf2SR	hsf|hstf	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597287	2541531	2541914	278031	278404	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC2F3.03c	fft3	rpa49	snf2SR	rpa51	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597288	2541531	2542028	278031	278510	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC2F3.09	fft3	hem1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597289	2541531	2541629	278031	278125	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC2F7.05c	fft3	SPAC2F7.05c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597290	2541531	2541755	278031	278249	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC2F7.11	fft3	nrd1	snf2SR	msa2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597291	2541531	2542065	278031	278542	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC2F7.16c	fft3	pld1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597292	2541531	2542054	278031	278533	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC2G11.06	fft3	vps4	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597293	2541531	2541739	278031	278233	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC2G11.10c	fft3	SPAC2G11.10c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597294	2541531	2541848	278031	278339	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC2G11.14	fft3	taf111	snf2SR	kat4|taf1|taf130	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597295	2541531	2541465	278031	277967	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC30C2.02	fft3	mmd1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597296	2541531	2543087	278031	279520	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC30C2.04	fft3	SPAC30C2.04	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597297	2541531	2542940	278031	279381	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC31A2.12	fft3	SPAC31A2.12	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597298	2541531	2543190	278031	279619	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC31F12.01	fft3	zds1	snf2SR	SPAC637.14|mug88	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597299	2541531	2542609	278031	279063	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC31G5.04	fft3	lys12	snf2SR	SPAC31G5.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597300	2541531	2543040	278031	279475	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC31G5.13	fft3	rpn11	snf2SR	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597301	2541531	2543121	278031	279553	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC31G5.16c	fft3	dpm1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597302	2541531	2543084	278031	279517	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC31G5.19	fft3	abo1	snf2SR	SPAC31G5.19	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597303	2541531	2542059	278031	278537	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC328.06	fft3	ubp2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597304	2541531	2542942	278031	279383	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC32A11.04c	fft3	tif212	snf2SR	SPAC6B12.17c|tif22	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597305	2541531	2541660	278031	278156	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC343.05	fft3	vma1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597306	2541531	2543035	278031	279470	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC343.14c	fft3	SPAC343.14c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597307	2541531	2543119	278031	279551	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3A11.07	fft3	nde2	snf2SR	SPAC3A11.07	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597308	2541531	2543080	278031	279513	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3A11.10c	fft3	SPAC3A11.10c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597309	2541531	3361462	278031	280538	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3A11.12c	fft3	rpt5	snf2SR	pam2|tbp1|SPAC3H5.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597310	2541531	2543107	278031	279539	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3A12.05c	fft3	taf2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597311	2541531	2543108	278031	279540	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3A12.13c	fft3	SPAC3A12.13c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597312	2541531	2543039	278031	279474	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3A12.14	fft3	cam1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597313	2541531	2543686	278031	280100	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3C7.14c	fft3	obr1	snf2SR	apt1|uhp1|p25	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597314	2541531	2543452	278031	279872	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3G9.04	fft3	ssu72	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597315	2541531	2543647	278031	280061	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3G9.06	fft3	frs2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597316	2541531	2543455	278031	279875	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3G9.09c	fft3	tif211	snf2SR	eIF2alpha	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597317	2541531	2543367	278031	279789	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3H1.10	fft3	pcs2	snf2SR	SPAC3H1.10|pcs	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597318	2541531	2543251	278031	279679	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3H1.11	fft3	hsr1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597319	2541531	2543637	278031	280051	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3H8.02	fft3	csr102	snf2SR	SPAC3H8.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597320	2541531	2543636	278031	280050	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3H8.08c	fft3	SPAC3H8.08c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597321	2541531	2543638	278031	280052	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3H8.09c	fft3	nab3	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597322	2541531	2543628	278031	280042	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC3H8.10	fft3	spo20	snf2SR	sec14	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597323	2541531	2543631	278031	280045	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC458.02c	fft3	SPAC458.02c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597324	2541531	2543095	278031	279527	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC4A8.03c	fft3	ptc4	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597325	2541531	2543098	278031	279530	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC4A8.06c	fft3	SPAC4A8.06c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597326	2541531	2543618	278031	280032	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC4A8.11c	fft3	fas2	snf2SR	lsd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597327	2541531	2543621	278031	280035	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC4A8.16c	fft3	tif33	snf2SR	SPAC823.01c|SPAC1E11.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597328	2541531	2543537	278031	279954	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC4D7.05	fft3	sum1	snf2SR	tif34	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597329	2541531	2543622	278031	280036	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC4D7.09	fft3	tif223	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597330	2541531	2543409	278031	279831	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC4D7.13	fft3	usp104	snf2SR	prp40	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597331	2541531	2543574	278031	279989	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC4F10.06	fft3	SPAC4F10.06	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597332	2541531	2543515	278031	279933	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC4F10.14c	fft3	btf3	snf2SR	btt1|egd1|nac2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597333	2541531	2543589	278031	280004	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC4F10.15c	fft3	wsp1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597334	2541531	2543592	278031	280007	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC4F10.18	fft3	nup37	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597335	2541531	2543607	278031	280022	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC4F8.07c	fft3	hxk2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597336	2541531	2543413	278031	279835	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC4F8.12c	fft3	spp42	snf2SR	cwf6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597337	2541531	2543391	278031	279813	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC4G9.09c	fft3	arg11	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597338	2541531	2543672	278031	280086	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC4H3.01	fft3	SPAC4H3.01	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597339	2541531	2543557	278031	279974	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC4H3.10c	fft3	pyk1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597340	2541531	3361483	278031	280559	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC513.01c	fft3	eft201	snf2SR	SPAPYUK71.04c|eft2-1|etf2|eft2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597341	2541531	2543350	278031	279772	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC56E4.03	fft3	SPAC56E4.03	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597342	2541531	2543344	278031	279766	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC56E4.04c	fft3	cut6	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597343	2541531	2543110	278031	279542	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC56E4.06c	fft3	ggt2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597344	2541531	2543241	278031	279669	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC56F8.03	fft3	SPAC56F8.03	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597345	2541531	2543229	278031	279657	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC56F8.05c	fft3	mug64	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597346	2541531	2541530	278031	278030	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC57A10.10c	fft3	sla1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597347	2541531	2542781	278031	279230	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC57A10.12c	fft3	ura3	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597348	2541531	2541505	278031	278007	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC57A7.04c	fft3	pabp	snf2SR	pab1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597349	2541531	2542255	278031	278725	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC57A7.08	fft3	pzh1	snf2SR	phz1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597350	2541531	2542247	278031	278717	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC57A7.10c	fft3	sec21	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597351	2541531	2542131	278031	278607	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC57A7.12	fft3	SPAC57A7.12	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597352	2541531	2542663	278031	279116	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC607.03c	fft3	snu13	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597353	2541531	2543114	278031	279546	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC607.05	fft3	rpn9	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597354	2541531	2543150	278031	279582	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC607.08c	fft3	SPAC607.08c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597355	2541531	2543233	278031	279661	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC630.03	fft3	arp3	snf2SR	act2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597356	2541531	2543426	278031	279846	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC631.02	fft3	bdf2	snf2SR	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597357	2541531	2543408	278031	279830	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC637.05c	fft3	vma2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597358	2541531	2543412	278031	279834	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC637.07	fft3	moe1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597359	2541531	2543416	278031	279838	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC637.08	fft3	nbp35	snf2SR	SPAC637.08	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597360	2541531	2543682	278031	280096	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC637.10c	fft3	rpn10	snf2SR	pus1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597361	2541531	2543674	278031	280088	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC637.13c	fft3	slm1	snf2SR	SPAC637.13c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597362	2541531	2543570	278031	279985	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC644.18c	fft3	bet3	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597363	2541531	2543563	278031	279979	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC664.02c	fft3	arp8	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597364	2541531	2543491	278031	279911	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC683.02c	fft3	SPAC683.02c	snf2SR	SPAC694.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597365	2541531	2543479	278031	279899	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC688.04c	fft3	gst3	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597366	2541531	2543336	278031	279759	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC688.11	fft3	end4	snf2SR	sla2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597367	2541531	2543333	278031	279756	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC694.02	fft3	SPAC694.02	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597368	2541531	2542938	278031	279379	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC6B12.08	fft3	mug185	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597369	2541531	2543310	278031	279734	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC6B12.11	fft3	drc1	snf2SR	sld2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597370	2541531	2543298	278031	279723	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC6B12.15	fft3	cpc2	snf2SR	rkp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597371	2541531	2543031	278031	279467	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC6F12.02	fft3	rst2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597372	2541531	2542946	278031	279386	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC6F12.03c	fft3	fsv1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597373	2541531	2541592	278031	278089	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC6F12.15c	fft3	cut9	snf2SR	dre1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597374	2541531	2542427	278031	278889	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC6F6.12	fft3	SPAC6F6.12	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597375	2541531	2542598	278031	279052	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC6G10.08	fft3	idp1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597376	2541531	2542534	278031	278992	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC6G10.09	fft3	SPAC6G10.09	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597377	2541531	2541455	278031	277958	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC6G9.06c	fft3	pcp1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597378	2541531	2541978	278031	278463	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC6G9.12	fft3	cfr1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597379	2541531	2541960	278031	278447	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC6G9.15c	fft3	SPAC6G9.15c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597380	2541531	2541800	278031	278291	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC732.02c	fft3	SPAC732.02c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597381	2541531	2542724	278031	279175	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC767.01c	fft3	vps1	snf2SR	SPAC9G1.14c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597382	2541531	2542091	278031	278568	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC7D4.02c	fft3	sfp47	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597383	2541531	2541735	278031	278229	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC7D4.04	fft3	atg11	snf2SR	taf1|cvt9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597384	2541531	2543199	278031	279628	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC821.03c	fft3	slf1	snf2SR	SPAC821.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597385	2541531	2543153	278031	279585	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC821.05	fft3	SPAC821.05	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597386	2541531	2543410	278031	279832	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC821.11	fft3	pro1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597387	2541531	2543571	278031	279986	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC823.08c	fft3	SPAC823.08c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597388	2541531	2542052	278031	278531	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC823.15	fft3	ppa1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597389	2541531	2542780	278031	279229	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC824.06	fft3	tim14	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597390	2541531	2543236	278031	279664	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC8C9.04	fft3	SPAC8C9.04	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597391	2541531	2542017	278031	278500	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC8C9.15c	fft3	tif225	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597392	2541531	2542029	278031	278511	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC8E11.02c	fft3	rad24	snf2SR	anr5|sam4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597393	2541531	2543428	278031	279848	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC8E11.10	fft3	SPAC8E11.10	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597394	2541531	2543596	278031	280011	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC8F11.06	fft3	brr6	snf2SR	brl1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597395	2541531	2543585	278031	280000	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC9.09	fft3	met26	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597396	2541531	2543539	278031	279956	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC926.04c	fft3	hsp90	snf2SR	git10|swo1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597397	2541531	2543531	278031	279949	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC926.06c	fft3	SPAC926.06c	snf2SR	lrr1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597398	2541531	2543500	278031	279918	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC926.08c	fft3	SPAC926.08c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597399	2541531	2543497	278031	279916	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC926.09c	fft3	fas1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597400	2541531	2543325	278031	279748	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC977.14c	fft3	SPAC977.14c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597401	2541531	2543296	278031	279721	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC9E9.03	fft3	leu2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597402	2541531	2543290	278031	279715	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC9E9.10c	fft3	cbh1	snf2SR	cbh	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597403	2541531	2542873	278031	279318	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC9G1.02	fft3	wis4	snf2SR	wak1|wik1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597404	2541531	2542412	278031	278876	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAC9G1.13c	fft3	swc4	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597405	2541531	2542442	278031	278904	SPAC25A8.01c	SPACUNK12.02c	fft3	cmk1	snf2SR	CaMK-I|SPAC25D11.02C	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597406	2541531	2542498	278031	278957	SPAC25A8.01c	SPACUNK4.16c	fft3	SPACUNK4.16c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597407	2541531	2542079	278031	278556	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAP7G5.04c	fft3	lys1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597408	2541531	2542597	278031	279051	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAP8A3.07c	fft3	SPAP8A3.07c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597409	2541531	2543042	278031	279477	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAP8A3.09c	fft3	paa1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597410	2541531	2543372	278031	279794	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAPB1A10.09	fft3	ase1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597411	2541531	2543439	278031	279859	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAPB1A10.13	fft3	SPAPB1A10.13	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597412	2541531	2543509	278031	279927	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAPB1E7.07	fft3	glt1	snf2SR	gog1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597413	2541531	2543522	278031	279940	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAPB24D3.08c	fft3	SPAPB24D3.08c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597414	2541531	2543347	278031	279769	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAPB8E5.02c	fft3	rpn502	snf2SR	rpn5|rpn5-b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597415	2541531	2543227	278031	279655	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAPB8E5.09	fft3	rvb1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597416	2541531	2543305	278031	279729	SPAC25A8.01c	SPAPJ696.02	fft3	lsb4	snf2SR	SPAPJ696.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597417	2541531	2540105	278031	276642	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC106.04	fft3	ada1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597418	2541531	2540063	278031	276601	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC106.05c	fft3	tim11	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597419	2541531	2540053	278031	276591	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC106.06	fft3	cct4	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597420	2541531	2539781	278031	276331	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC106.10	fft3	pka1	snf2SR	git6|tpk|sam1|sam5|sam6|sam7	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597421	2541531	2539799	278031	276349	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC106.11c	fft3	plg7	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597422	2541531	2539889	278031	276435	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC106.14c	fft3	sda1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597423	2541531	2539815	278031	276365	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1105.02c	fft3	lys4	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597424	2541531	2540109	278031	276646	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC119.01	fft3	rpn3	snf2SR	SPBPJ4664.07	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597425	2541531	2540083	278031	276621	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC119.02	fft3	ubc4	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597426	2541531	2539826	278031	276375	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC119.06	fft3	sco1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597427	2541531	2539704	278031	276257	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC119.10	fft3	asn1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597428	2541531	2540112	278031	276649	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC11C11.02	fft3	imp2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597429	2541531	2539818	278031	276368	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC11C11.08	fft3	srp1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597430	2541531	2539810	278031	276360	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1271.07c	fft3	SPBC1271.07c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597431	2541531	2540206	278031	276739	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1271.12	fft3	kes1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597432	2541531	2540149	278031	276686	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1289.03c	fft3	spi1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597433	2541531	2539992	278031	276536	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1289.04c	fft3	pob1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597434	2541531	2539663	278031	276218	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1289.07c	fft3	rpc40	snf2SR	rpa42	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597435	2541531	2540193	278031	276726	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1289.10c	fft3	adn2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597436	2541531	2539845	278031	276393	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC12C2.02c	fft3	ste20	snf2SR	ste16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597437	2541531	2539816	278031	276366	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC12C2.04	fft3	SPBC12C2.04	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597438	2541531	2540159	278031	276694	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC12C2.08	fft3	dnm1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597439	2541531	2540018	278031	276562	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC12C2.10c	fft3	pst1	snf2SR	SPBC21D10.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597440	2541531	2539622	278031	276179	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC12C2.11	fft3	SPBC12C2.11	snf2SR	SPBC21D10.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597441	2541531	2539691	278031	276245	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC12D12.03	fft3	cct1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597442	2541531	2540129	278031	276666	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC12D12.08c	fft3	ned8	snf2SR	SPBC24C6.01c|nedd8|ubl1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597443	2541531	2539812	278031	276362	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1347.02	fft3	fkbp39	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597444	2541531	2540096	278031	276634	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1347.04	fft3	tim54	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597445	2541531	2540021	278031	276565	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1347.05c	fft3	SPBC1347.05c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597446	2541531	2539697	278031	276250	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC13A2.02	fft3	nup82	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597447	2541531	2540161	278031	276696	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC13E7.03c	fft3	SPBC13E7.03c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597448	2541531	2539726	278031	276278	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC13E7.08c	fft3	leo1	snf2SR	SPBC13E7.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597449	2541531	2540100	278031	276638	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC13E7.09	fft3	vrp1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597450	2541531	2539751	278031	276303	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC13G1.02	fft3	mpg2	snf2SR	SPBC13G1.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597451	2541531	2539667	278031	276222	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC13G1.08c	fft3	ash2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597452	2541531	2539712	278031	276265	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC146.01	fft3	med15	snf2SR	SPBP35G2.15	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597453	2541531	2539645	278031	276200	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC146.07	fft3	prp2	snf2SR	mis11|ods1|uaf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597454	2541531	2539672	278031	276227	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC146.12	fft3	coq6	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597455	2541531	2539798	278031	276348	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC146.14c	fft3	sec26	snf2SR	SPBC337.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597456	2541531	2539636	278031	276192	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC14C8.02	fft3	tim44	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597457	2541531	2539692	278031	276246	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC14C8.03	fft3	fma2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597458	2541531	2540002	278031	276546	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC14C8.06	fft3	arc1	snf2SR	sop2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597459	2541531	2539834	278031	276383	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC14C8.14c	fft3	pol5	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597460	2541531	2539775	278031	276326	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC14C8.17c	fft3	spt8	snf2SR	sep9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597461	2541531	2539863	278031	276410	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC14F5.03c	fft3	kap123	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597462	2541531	2539764	278031	276315	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC14F5.04c	fft3	pgk1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597463	2541531	2539943	278031	276487	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC14F5.05c	fft3	sam1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597464	2541531	2539753	278031	276305	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC14F5.06	fft3	rli1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597465	2541531	2539985	278031	276529	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC14F5.09c	fft3	ade8	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597466	2541531	2539722	278031	276275	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC14F5.11c	fft3	mug186	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597467	2541531	2539973	278031	276517	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1539.09c	fft3	trp1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597468	2541531	2539831	278031	276380	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC15C4.05	fft3	dhx29	snf2SR	SPBC15C4.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597469	2541531	2540128	278031	276665	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC15D4.03	fft3	slm9	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597470	2541531	2539882	278031	276428	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC15D4.14	fft3	taf73	snf2SR	taf5|taf5l	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597471	2541531	2540203	278031	276736	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1604.09c	fft3	SPBC1604.09c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597472	2541531	2539997	278031	276541	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1604.14c	fft3	shk1	snf2SR	orb2|pak1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597473	2541531	2540162	278031	276697	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1677.03c	fft3	SPBC1677.03c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597474	2541531	2539769	278031	276320	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1685.08	fft3	cti6	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597475	2541531	2539727	278031	276279	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1685.13	fft3	fhn1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597476	2541531	2539965	278031	276509	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1685.14c	fft3	SPBC1685.14c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597477	2541531	2539743	278031	276295	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC16A3.08c	fft3	oga1	snf2SR	SPBC16A3.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597478	2541531	2539864	278031	276411	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC16A3.15c	fft3	nda2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597479	2541531	2540138	278031	276675	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC16C6.02c	fft3	vps1302	snf2SR	vps13b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597480	2541531	2539861	278031	276408	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC16C6.06	fft3	vps10	snf2SR	pep1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597481	2541531	2539862	278031	276409	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC16C6.07c	fft3	rpt1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597482	2541531	3361342	278031	280418	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC16D10.07c	fft3	sir2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597483	2541531	2540026	278031	276570	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC16D10.08c	fft3	hsp104	snf2SR	SPBC16D10.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597484	2541531	2539968	278031	276512	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC16E9.10c	fft3	SPBC16E9.10c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597485	2541531	2540025	278031	276569	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC16G5.01	fft3	rpn12	snf2SR	SPBC342.07|mts3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597486	2541531	2539972	278031	276516	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC16H5.02	fft3	pfk1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597487	2541531	2540075	278031	276613	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC16H5.06	fft3	rip1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597488	2541531	2540072	278031	276610	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC16H5.07c	fft3	ppa2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597489	2541531	2540078	278031	276616	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC16H5.08c	fft3	SPBC16H5.08c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597490	2541531	2539948	278031	276492	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1703.02	fft3	rsc9	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597491	2541531	2539957	278031	276501	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1703.05	fft3	rio2	snf2SR	SPBC1703.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597492	2541531	2539879	278031	276425	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1703.07	fft3	SPBC1703.07	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597493	2541531	2540120	278031	276657	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1703.12	fft3	ubp9	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597494	2541531	2540197	278031	276730	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1709.02c	fft3	vrs1	snf2SR	SPBC1734.18c|ValRS1|vas1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597495	2541531	2540199	278031	276732	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1709.05	fft3	sks2	snf2SR	hsc1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597496	2541531	2539694	278031	276248	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1709.08	fft3	cft1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597497	2541531	2539894	278031	276440	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1709.12	fft3	rid1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597498	2541531	2539952	278031	276496	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1709.14	fft3	SPBC1709.14	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597499	2541531	2539693	278031	276247	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1711.07	fft3	SPBC1711.07	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597500	2541531	2539806	278031	276356	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1711.08	fft3	aha1	snf2SR	SPBC1711.08	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597501	2541531	2539650	278031	276205	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1711.13	fft3	his2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597502	2541531	2539789	278031	276339	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1711.16	fft3	pwp1	snf2SR	SPBC1711.16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597503	2541531	2540511	278031	277039	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1718.01	fft3	pop1	snf2SR	SPBC2G2.18|ste16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597504	2541531	2539675	278031	276230	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1718.03	fft3	ker1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597505	2541531	2539686	278031	276241	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1734.06	fft3	rhp18	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597506	2541531	2539671	278031	276226	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1734.11	fft3	mas5	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597507	2541531	2539793	278031	276343	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1734.16c	fft3	pst3	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597508	2541531	2539970	278031	276514	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1773.01	fft3	far8	snf2SR	SPBC1773.01|csc3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597509	2541531	2540046	278031	276584	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1773.10c	fft3	nrs1	snf2SR	ded81	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597510	2541531	2539801	278031	276351	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1778.01c	fft3	zuo1	snf2SR	SPBC30D10.01|mpp11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597511	2541531	2539765	278031	276316	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1778.06c	fft3	fim1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597512	2541531	2540144	278031	276681	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1778.08c	fft3	arc3	snf2SR	arc21	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597513	2541531	2540052	278031	276590	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC17A3.04c	fft3	rar1	snf2SR	mes1|mrs1|pi042	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597514	2541531	2539841	278031	276389	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC17D1.05	fft3	SPBC17D1.05	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597515	2541531	2539938	278031	276482	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC17D11.05	fft3	tif32	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597516	2541531	2540191	278031	276724	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC17D11.07c	fft3	rpn2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597517	2541531	2539614	278031	276172	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC17D11.08	fft3	SPBC17D11.08	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597518	2541531	2539616	278031	276174	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC17G9.02c	fft3	cdc73	snf2SR	SPBC17G9.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597519	2541531	2539746	278031	276298	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC17G9.03c	fft3	krs1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597520	2541531	2539738	278031	276290	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC17G9.09	fft3	tif213	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597521	2541531	2539661	278031	276216	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC17G9.11c	fft3	pyr1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597522	2541531	2539782	278031	276332	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1815.01	fft3	eno101	snf2SR	eno1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597523	2541531	2539633	278031	276189	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1826.01c	fft3	mot1	snf2SR	SPBC25B2.12.c|SPBC6B1.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597524	2541531	2540762	278031	277282	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC18E5.01	fft3	SPBC18E5.01	snf2SR	SPBC29A3.19	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597525	2541531	2540731	278031	277254	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC18H10.02	fft3	lcf1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597526	2541531	2540819	278031	277337	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC18H10.03	fft3	tif35	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597527	2541531	2540528	278031	277056	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC18H10.04c	fft3	sce3	snf2SR	tif48	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597528	2541531	2540833	278031	277351	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC18H10.20c	fft3	any1	snf2SR	SPBC18H10.20c|arn1|art1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597529	2541531	2540648	278031	277173	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1921.05	fft3	ape2	snf2SR	ape1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597530	2541531	2540767	278031	277287	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC19C2.07	fft3	fba1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597531	2541531	2540431	278031	276959	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC19C7.06	fft3	prs1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597532	2541531	2540706	278031	277229	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC19C7.12c	fft3	omh1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597533	2541531	2540602	278031	277128	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC19F5.04	fft3	SPBC19F5.04	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597534	2541531	2540659	278031	277184	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC19F5.05c	fft3	ppp1	snf2SR	SPBC25D12.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597535	2541531	2540413	278031	276941	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC19F8.01c	fft3	spn7	snf2SR	SPBC21.08c|mde8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597536	2541531	2540695	278031	277219	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC19G7.01c	fft3	msh2	snf2SR	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597537	2541531	2540778	278031	277297	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC19G7.10c	fft3	SPBC19G7.10c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597538	2541531	2540732	278031	277255	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC19G7.13	fft3	tbf1	snf2SR	trf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597539	2541531	2540721	278031	277244	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC19G7.16	fft3	iws1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597540	2541531	2540283	278031	276814	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1A4.02c	fft3	leu1	snf2SR	SPBC1E8.07c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597541	2541531	2540567	278031	277094	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1A4.08c	fft3	cct3	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597542	2541531	2540768	278031	277288	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC1D7.02c	fft3	scr1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597543	2541531	2540660	278031	277185	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC21.06c	fft3	cdc7	snf2SR	its10|pld1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597544	2541531	2540738	278031	277261	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC211.07c	fft3	ubc8	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597545	2541531	2540729	278031	277252	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC215.08c	fft3	arg4	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597546	2541531	2540711	278031	277234	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC215.12	fft3	cwf10	snf2SR	snu114|spef2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597547	2541531	2540716	278031	277239	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC215.15	fft3	sec13	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597548	2541531	2540622	278031	277148	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC21C3.05	fft3	sap62	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597549	2541531	2540575	278031	277102	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC21C3.11	fft3	ubx4	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597550	2541531	2540508	278031	277036	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC21C3.15c	fft3	SPBC21C3.15c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597551	2541531	2540700	278031	277224	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC21C3.16c	fft3	spt4	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597552	2541531	2540488	278031	277016	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC21C3.17c	fft3	SPBC21C3.17c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597553	2541531	2540709	278031	277232	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC21D10.05c	fft3	ucp3	snf2SR	soc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597554	2541531	2540403	278031	276931	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC21D10.11c	fft3	nfs1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597555	2541531	2540614	278031	277140	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC21H7.02	fft3	taf10	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597556	2541531	2540551	278031	277078	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC23E6.01c	fft3	cxr1	snf2SR	SPBC23E6.01c|SPBPJ758.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597557	2541531	2540426	278031	276954	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC23E6.07c	fft3	rfc1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597558	2541531	2540656	278031	277181	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC23E6.09	fft3	ssn6	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597559	2541531	2540487	278031	277015	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC23G7.12c	fft3	rpt6	snf2SR	let1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597560	2541531	2540387	278031	276915	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC24C6.04	fft3	SPBC24C6.04	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597561	2541531	2540435	278031	276963	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC25B2.03	fft3	SPBC25B2.03	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597562	2541531	2540437	278031	276965	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC25B2.07c	fft3	mmb1	snf2SR	mug164	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597563	2541531	2540631	278031	277157	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC25B2.10	fft3	SPBC25B2.10	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597564	2541531	2540604	278031	277130	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC25D12.05	fft3	trm1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597565	2541531	2540550	278031	277077	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC25H2.02	fft3	trs1	snf2SR	ths1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597566	2541531	2540432	278031	276960	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC25H2.05	fft3	egd2	snf2SR	nac1|ucp15	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597567	2541531	2540408	278031	276936	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC25H2.11c	fft3	spt7	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597568	2541531	2540570	278031	277097	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC25H2.16c	fft3	gga22	snf2SR	SPBC25H2.16c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597569	2541531	2540559	278031	277086	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC26H8.04c	fft3	SPBC26H8.04c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597570	2541531	2540578	278031	277104	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC26H8.06	fft3	grx4	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597571	2541531	2540582	278031	277108	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC26H8.07c	fft3	nda3	snf2SR	alp12|ben1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597572	2541531	2540469	278031	276997	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC26H8.08c	fft3	grn1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597573	2541531	2540376	278031	276905	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC26H8.11c	fft3	SPBC26H8.11c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597574	2541531	2540400	278031	276928	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC28F2.02	fft3	mep33	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597575	2541531	2540436	278031	276964	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC28F2.10c	fft3	ngg1	snf2SR	ada3|kap1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597576	2541531	2540292	278031	276823	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC28F2.12	fft3	rpb1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597577	2541531	2540533	278031	277061	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC29A10.16c	fft3	SPBC29A10.16c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597578	2541531	2540597	278031	277123	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC29A3.09c	fft3	SPBC29A3.09c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597579	2541531	2540456	278031	276984	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC29A3.18	fft3	cyt1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597580	2541531	2540329	278031	276859	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC29B5.01	fft3	atf1	snf2SR	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597581	2541531	2540310	278031	276840	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC29B5.04c	fft3	SPBC29B5.04c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597582	2541531	2540410	278031	276938	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC2D10.04	fft3	SPBC2D10.04	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597583	2541531	2540479	278031	277007	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC2D10.10c	fft3	fib1	snf2SR	fib|nop1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597584	2541531	2540409	278031	276937	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC2D10.11c	fft3	nap2	snf2SR	nap1.2|nap12	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597585	2541531	2540558	278031	277085	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC2D10.17	fft3	clr1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597586	2541531	2540411	278031	276939	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC2D10.18	fft3	abc1	snf2SR	coq8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597587	2541531	2540421	278031	276949	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC2D10.19c	fft3	alb1	snf2SR	SPBC2D10.19c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597588	2541531	2540346	278031	276875	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC2F12.03c	fft3	ebs1	snf2SR	SPBC2F12.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597589	2541531	2540357	278031	276886	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC2F12.05c	fft3	SPBC2F12.05c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597590	2541531	2540315	278031	276845	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC2F12.14c	fft3	gua1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597591	2541531	2540270	278031	276801	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC2G2.02	fft3	syj1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597592	2541531	2540300	278031	276831	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC2G2.08	fft3	ade9	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597593	2541531	2540441	278031	276969	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC2G5.05	fft3	SPBC2G5.05	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597594	2541531	2540326	278031	276856	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC2G5.06c	fft3	hmt2	snf2SR	cad1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597595	2541531	2540335	278031	276865	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC30B4.03c	fft3	adn1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597596	2541531	2540273	278031	276804	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC30D10.13c	fft3	pdb1	snf2SR	agg1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597597	2541531	2540339	278031	276868	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC30D10.17c	fft3	smi1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597598	2541531	2540439	278031	276967	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC31F10.06c	fft3	sar1	snf2SR	psr1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597599	2541531	2540327	278031	276857	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC31F10.07	fft3	lsb5	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597600	2541531	2540219	278031	276752	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC31F10.13c	fft3	hip1	snf2SR	hir1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597601	2541531	2540227	278031	276759	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC31F10.14c	fft3	hip3	snf2SR	hir3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597602	2541531	2540240	278031	276772	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC31F10.16	fft3	SPBC31F10.16	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597603	2541531	2540237	278031	276769	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC32F12.06	fft3	pch1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597604	2541531	2540547	278031	277074	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC32F12.11	fft3	tdh1	snf2SR	gpd1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597605	2541531	2540239	278031	276771	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC32H8.10	fft3	cdk9	snf2SR	SPACTOKYO_453.22	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597606	2541531	2540051	278031	276589	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC32H8.12c	fft3	act1	snf2SR	cps8|pi012	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597607	2541531	2540247	278031	276779	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC336.02	fft3	SPBC336.02	snf2SR	dim1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597608	2541531	2540255	278031	276786	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC336.04	fft3	cdc6	snf2SR	mis10|pol3|pold	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597609	2541531	2540251	278031	276783	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC336.05c	fft3	SPBC336.05c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597610	2541531	2540231	278031	276763	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC336.14c	fft3	ppk26	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597611	2541531	2540305	278031	276835	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC337.05c	fft3	cct8	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597612	2541531	2540978	278031	277494	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC342.02	fft3	qrs1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597613	2541531	2540980	278031	277496	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC342.04	fft3	rpn1301	snf2SR	rpn13|rpn13a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597614	2541531	2540303	278031	276833	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC354.01	fft3	gtp1	snf2SR	SPBC649.06	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597615	2541531	2541044	278031	277559	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC354.05c	fft3	sre2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597616	2541531	2540988	278031	277504	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC354.08c	fft3	SPBC354.08c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597617	2541531	2540930	278031	277446	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC354.10	fft3	def1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597618	2541531	2540975	278031	277491	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC354.12	fft3	gpd3	snf2SR	SPNCRNA.314|SPNG1235	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597619	2541531	2540368	278031	276897	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC36.05c	fft3	clr6	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597620	2541531	2541017	278031	277532	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC36.07	fft3	elp1	snf2SR	iki3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597621	2541531	2540949	278031	277465	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC365.09c	fft3	SPBC365.09c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597622	2541531	2541031	278031	277546	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC365.10	fft3	arp5	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597623	2541531	2540959	278031	277475	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC365.12c	fft3	ish1	snf2SR	isp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597624	2541531	2540967	278031	277483	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC36B7.08c	fft3	SPBC36B7.08c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597625	2541531	2540133	278031	276670	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC3B8.02	fft3	php5	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597626	2541531	2540908	278031	277424	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC3B8.03	fft3	SPBC3B8.03	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597627	2541531	2541041	278031	277556	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC3D6.13c	fft3	pdi3	snf2SR	pdi2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597628	2541531	2540977	278031	277493	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC3E7.02c	fft3	hsp16	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597629	2541531	2540928	278031	277444	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC3E7.10	fft3	fma1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597630	2541531	2540676	278031	277201	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC3E7.11c	fft3	SPBC3E7.11c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597631	2541531	2541003	278031	277518	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC3E7.16c	fft3	leu3	snf2SR	SPBC4F6.03c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597632	2541531	3361358	278031	280434	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC3F6.03	fft3	trr1	snf2SR	caf4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597633	2541531	2541022	278031	277537	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC3F6.05	fft3	rga1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597634	2541531	2540991	278031	277507	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC3H7.03c	fft3	SPBC3H7.03c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597635	2541531	2540718	278031	277241	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC3H7.15	fft3	hhp1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597636	2541531	2541076	278031	277591	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC4.02c	fft3	SPBC4.02c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597637	2541531	2540939	278031	277455	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC4.07c	fft3	rpt2	snf2SR	mts2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597638	2541531	2541034	278031	277549	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC405.01	fft3	ade1	snf2SR	SPBC4C3.02c|min4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597639	2541531	2541055	278031	277570	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC409.07c	fft3	wis1	snf2SR	smf2|spc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597640	2541531	2540831	278031	277349	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC428.02c	fft3	eca39	snf2SR	SPBC582.12c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597641	2541531	2541050	278031	277565	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC428.05c	fft3	arg12	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597642	2541531	2540818	278031	277336	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC428.10	fft3	SPBC428.10	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597643	2541531	2540972	278031	277488	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC428.15	fft3	SPBC428.15	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597644	2541531	2540858	278031	277375	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC428.19c	fft3	utp15	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597645	2541531	2540873	278031	277390	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC4C3.05c	fft3	nuc1	snf2SR	rpa1|rpa190	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597646	2541531	2540862	278031	277379	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC4C3.06	fft3	syp1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597647	2541531	2540868	278031	277385	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC4C3.07	fft3	SPBC4C3.07	snf2SR	csn6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597648	2541531	2540792	278031	277311	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC4F6.06	fft3	kin1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597649	2541531	2540888	278031	277405	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC4F6.13c	fft3	SPBC4F6.13c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597650	2541531	2541060	278031	277575	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC56F2.09c	fft3	arg5	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597651	2541531	3361354	278031	280430	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC56F2.12	fft3	ilv5	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597652	2541531	2541056	278031	277571	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC577.04	fft3	SPBC577.04	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597653	2541531	2540883	278031	277400	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC577.06c	fft3	stt4	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597654	2541531	2541028	278031	277543	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC577.08c	fft3	txl1	snf2SR	trx3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597655	2541531	2541098	278031	277613	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC577.13	fft3	syj2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597656	2541531	2540794	278031	277313	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC582.07c	fft3	rpn7	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597657	2541531	2541114	278031	277629	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC582.09	fft3	pex11	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597658	2541531	2541110	278031	277625	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC646.05c	fft3	erg9	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597659	2541531	2541093	278031	277608	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC646.08c	fft3	SPBC646.08c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597660	2541531	2541089	278031	277604	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC646.09c	fft3	int6	snf2SR	yin6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597661	2541531	2541087	278031	277602	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC646.10c	fft3	SPBC646.10c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597662	2541531	2541128	278031	277643	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC646.11	fft3	cct6	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597663	2541531	2540440	278031	276968	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC646.12c	fft3	gap1	snf2SR	sar1|src1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597664	2541531	2541139	278031	277654	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC646.16	fft3	scl1	snf2SR	SPBC646.16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597665	2541531	2541119	278031	277634	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC651.11c	fft3	apm3	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597666	2541531	2541115	278031	277630	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC660.07	fft3	ntp1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597667	2541531	2541062	278031	277577	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC660.11	fft3	tcg1	snf2SR	mug187	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597668	2541531	2541146	278031	277661	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC660.16	fft3	SPBC660.16	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597669	2541531	2541159	278031	277674	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC685.09	fft3	orc2	snf2SR	orp2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597670	2541531	2541162	278031	277677	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC691.03c	fft3	apl3	snf2SR	pi033|SPACTOKYO_453.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597671	2541531	2541109	278031	277624	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC6B1.02	fft3	ppk30	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597672	2541531	2540755	278031	277276	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC713.09	fft3	SPBC713.09	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597673	2541531	2541152	278031	277667	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC713.10	fft3	tim16	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597674	2541531	2541095	278031	277610	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC725.06c	fft3	ppk31	snf2SR	mug25	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597675	2541531	2541143	278031	277658	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC725.08	fft3	pir2	snf2SR	SPBC725.08|ars2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597676	2541531	2541160	278031	277675	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC725.09c	fft3	hob3	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597677	2541531	2541161	278031	277676	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC725.11c	fft3	php2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597678	2541531	2541166	278031	277681	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC725.15	fft3	ura5	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597679	2541531	2541193	278031	277707	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC776.02c	fft3	dis2	snf2SR	bws1|sds1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597680	2541531	2541216	278031	277730	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC776.09	fft3	ste13	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597681	2541531	2540821	278031	277339	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC800.03	fft3	clr3	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597682	2541531	2540936	278031	277452	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC800.05c	fft3	atb2	snf2SR	alp2|ban5|tub1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597683	2541531	2541077	278031	277592	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC83.08	fft3	rvb2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597684	2541531	2540215	278031	276748	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC83.14c	fft3	rfc5	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597685	2541531	2541188	278031	277702	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC83.16c	fft3	SPBC83.16c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597686	2541531	2541192	278031	277706	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC83.17	fft3	SPBC83.17	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597687	2541531	2541211	278031	277725	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC839.10	fft3	usp107	snf2SR	snu71	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597688	2541531	2541217	278031	277731	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC839.16	fft3	thf1	snf2SR	SPBC839.16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597689	2541531	2541245	278031	277759	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC8D2.06	fft3	irs1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597690	2541531	2541218	278031	277732	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC8D2.18c	fft3	SPBC8D2.18c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597691	2541531	2541273	278031	277787	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC8D2.20c	fft3	sec31	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597692	2541531	2541281	278031	277794	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC902.04	fft3	rmn1	snf2SR	SPBC902.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597693	2541531	2541260	278031	277774	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC902.05c	fft3	idh2	snf2SR	glu2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597694	2541531	2541249	278031	277763	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC947.01	fft3	alf1	snf2SR	SPBC947.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597695	2541531	2541255	278031	277769	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC947.02	fft3	apl2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597696	2541531	2541262	278031	277776	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC947.14c	fft3	cbp6	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597697	2541531	2540211	278031	276744	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC947.15c	fft3	nde1	snf2SR	SPBC947.15c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597698	2541531	2541305	278031	277817	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC9B6.08	fft3	clc1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597699	2541531	2541286	278031	277799	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC9B6.11c	fft3	SPBC9B6.11c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597700	2541531	2541265	278031	277779	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP16F5.03c	fft3	tra1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597701	2541531	2541306	278031	277818	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP16F5.07	fft3	apm1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597702	2541531	2541243	278031	277757	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP18G5.02	fft3	SPBP18G5.02	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597703	2541531	2541268	278031	277782	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP19A11.03c	fft3	mts4	snf2SR	rpn1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597704	2541531	2541280	278031	277793	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP23A10.07	fft3	rpa2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597705	2541531	2541318	278031	277830	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP23A10.08	fft3	alp5	snf2SR	arp4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597706	2541531	2541327	278031	277839	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP23A10.10	fft3	ppk32	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597707	2541531	2541257	278031	277771	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP23A10.14c	fft3	ell1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597708	2541531	2541341	278031	277852	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP35G2.05c	fft3	cki2	snf2SR	sst3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597709	2541531	2541345	278031	277856	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP35G2.07	fft3	ilv1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597710	2541531	2541323	278031	277835	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP35G2.14	fft3	SPBP35G2.14	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597711	2541531	2541339	278031	277850	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP4G3.02	fft3	pho1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597712	2541531	2540024	278031	276568	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP4H10.04	fft3	ppb1	snf2SR	SPBC1346.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597713	2541531	2541319	278031	277831	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP4H10.06c	fft3	cut14	snf2SR	smc2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597714	2541531	2541304	278031	277816	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP4H10.07	fft3	SPBP4H10.07	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597715	2541531	2541350	278031	277861	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP4H10.11c	fft3	lcf2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597716	2541531	2541348	278031	277859	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP4H10.15	fft3	SPBP4H10.15	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597717	2541531	2541385	278031	277896	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP8B7.15c	fft3	mpe1	snf2SR	SPBP8B7.15c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597718	2541531	2541355	278031	277866	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP8B7.19	fft3	spt16	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597719	2541531	2541378	278031	277889	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP8B7.21	fft3	ubp3	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597720	2541531	2541382	278031	277893	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBP8B7.29	fft3	abz1	snf2SR	SPBP8B7.29	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597721	2541531	3361177	278031	280253	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBPB21E7.07	fft3	aes1	snf2SR	SPAPB21E7.07	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597722	2541531	2541354	278031	277865	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBPB7E8.02	fft3	SPBPB7E8.02	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597723	2541531	2541402	278031	277911	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBPJ4664.01	fft3	dps1	snf2SR	SPBPJ694.01|dps	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597724	2541531	2541412	278031	277920	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBPJ4664.04	fft3	SPBPJ4664.04	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597725	2541531	2541413	278031	277921	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBPJ4664.06	fft3	gpt1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597726	2541531	2539239	278031	275809	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1020.10	fft3	oca2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597727	2541531	2539015	278031	275588	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1183.02	fft3	SPCC1183.02	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597728	2541531	2538897	278031	275475	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1183.07	fft3	SPCC1183.07	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597729	2541531	2539154	278031	275726	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC11E10.07c	fft3	SPCC11E10.07c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597730	2541531	2539079	278031	275651	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1223.01	fft3	SPCC1223.01	snf2SR	SPCC285.18	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597731	2541531	2539048	278031	275621	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1223.08c	fft3	dfr1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597732	2541531	2539159	278031	275731	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1235.01	fft3	SPCC1235.01	snf2SR	SPCC320.02c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597733	2541531	2538717	278031	275301	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1235.02	fft3	bio2	snf2SR	SPCC320.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597734	2541531	2539045	278031	275618	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1235.05c	fft3	fft2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597735	2541531	5802702	278031	857840	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1235.15	fft3	dga1	snf2SR	SPCC548.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597736	2541531	2539081	278031	275653	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1259.09c	fft3	pdx1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597737	2541531	2538871	278031	275450	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1259.14c	fft3	meu27	snf2SR	B8647-6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597738	2541531	2539082	278031	275654	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC126.03	fft3	pus1	snf2SR	lps1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597739	2541531	2539066	278031	275638	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC126.13c	fft3	SPCC126.13c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597740	2541531	2539061	278031	275633	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC126.15c	fft3	sec65	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597741	2541531	2538753	278031	275336	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1281.06c	fft3	SPCC1281.06c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597742	2541531	2538868	278031	275448	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC132.02	fft3	hst2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597743	2541531	2538877	278031	275456	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1322.04	fft3	fyu1	snf2SR	SPCC1322.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597744	2541531	2539027	278031	275600	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1322.08	fft3	srk1	snf2SR	mkp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597745	2541531	2538734	278031	275318	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1322.13	fft3	ade6	snf2SR	min1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597746	2541531	2538788	278031	275369	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1322.14c	fft3	vtc4	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597747	2541531	2538902	278031	275480	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC13B11.01	fft3	adh1	snf2SR	adh	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597748	2541531	2538802	278031	275383	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC13B11.04c	fft3	fmd3	snf2SR	SPCC13B11.04c|SPCC777.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597749	2541531	2539026	278031	275599	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1442.06	fft3	pre8	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597750	2541531	2538842	278031	275423	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1442.09	fft3	trp3	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597751	2541531	2538990	278031	275564	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1494.05c	fft3	ubp12	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597752	2541531	2538721	278031	275305	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1494.10	fft3	adn3	snf2SR	SPCC70.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597753	2541531	2539216	278031	275786	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC14G10.04	fft3	SPCC14G10.04	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597754	2541531	2538774	278031	275356	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC162.06c	fft3	SPCC162.06c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597755	2541531	2538843	278031	275424	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC162.08c	fft3	nup211	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597756	2541531	2538924	278031	275501	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1620.06c	fft3	SPCC1620.06c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597757	2541531	2539294	278031	275862	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1620.09c	fft3	tfg1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597758	2541531	2539285	278031	275853	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1672.02c	fft3	sap1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597759	2541531	2539269	278031	275839	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1672.05c	fft3	yrs1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597760	2541531	2539244	278031	275814	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1672.06c	fft3	asp1	snf2SR	vip1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597761	2541531	2539299	278031	275867	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1672.07	fft3	SPCC1672.07	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597762	2541531	2539236	278031	275806	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1672.08c	fft3	tfa2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597763	2541531	2538912	278031	275489	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1682.10	fft3	rpn8	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597764	2541531	2538947	278031	275521	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1682.12c	fft3	ubp16	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597765	2541531	2539189	278031	275760	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1682.16	fft3	rpt4	snf2SR	SPCC306.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597766	2541531	2538784	278031	275365	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC16A11.09c	fft3	tim23	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597767	2541531	2538772	278031	275355	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC16A11.10c	fft3	oca8	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597768	2541531	2539144	278031	275716	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC16A11.14	fft3	sfh1	snf2SR	SPNCRNA.125	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597769	2541531	2539182	278031	275753	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC16A11.16c	fft3	rpn1302	snf2SR	rpn13|rpn13b	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597770	2541531	2539358	278031	275924	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC16C4.07	fft3	scw1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597771	2541531	2539180	278031	275751	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC16C4.09	fft3	sts5	snf2SR	orb4	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597772	2541531	2539386	278031	275951	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC16C4.16c	fft3	SPCC16C4.16c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597773	2541531	2539133	278031	275705	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC16C4.18c	fft3	taf6	snf2SR	taf50	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597774	2541531	2539315	278031	275881	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1739.01	fft3	SPCC1739.01	snf2SR	SPCC1906.05	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597775	2541531	2538945	278031	275519	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1739.06c	fft3	SPCC1739.06c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597776	2541531	2539149	278031	275721	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1739.11c	fft3	cdc11	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597777	2541531	2539225	278031	275795	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1739.13	fft3	ssa2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597778	2541531	2538689	278031	275274	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1795.11	fft3	sum3	snf2SR	ded1|moc2|slh3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597779	2541531	2539145	278031	275717	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC18.11c	fft3	sdc1	snf2SR	dpy30	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597780	2541531	2538900	278031	275478	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1827.01c	fft3	utp25	snf2SR	SPCC1827.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597781	2541531	2539176	278031	275747	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1827.02c	fft3	SPCC1827.02c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597782	2541531	2539253	278031	275823	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1827.03c	fft3	SPCC1827.03c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597783	2541531	2539387	278031	275952	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1840.03	fft3	sal3	snf2SR	pse1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597784	2541531	2539241	278031	275811	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1840.06	fft3	atp5	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597785	2541531	2539024	278031	275597	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1902.01	fft3	gaf1	snf2SR	SPCC417.01c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597786	2541531	2539333	278031	275899	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1902.02	fft3	mug72	snf2SR	SPCC663.16c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597787	2541531	2538743	278031	275326	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1906.01	fft3	mpg1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597788	2541531	2539130	278031	275702	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC1919.03c	fft3	amk2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597789	2541531	2539266	278031	275836	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC23B6.01c	fft3	SPCC23B6.01c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597790	2541531	2539120	278031	275692	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC23B6.04c	fft3	SPCC23B6.04c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597791	2541531	2539356	278031	275922	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC24B10.04	fft3	SPCC24B10.04	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597792	2541531	2539006	278031	275579	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC24B10.11c	fft3	mft1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597793	2541531	2539388	278031	275953	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC24B10.12	fft3	cgi121	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597794	2541531	2538961	278031	275535	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC285.14	fft3	trs130	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597795	2541531	2539215	278031	275785	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC285.16c	fft3	msh6	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597796	2541531	2538951	278031	275525	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC297.03	fft3	ssp1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597797	2541531	2538829	278031	275410	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC306.09c	fft3	cap1	snf2SR	cap	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597798	2541531	2538699	278031	275284	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC31H12.07	fft3	sec231	snf2SR	SPCC5E4.01|sec23a	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597799	2541531	2538858	278031	275438	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC320.05	fft3	SPCC320.05	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597800	2541531	2539199	278031	275770	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC320.09	fft3	hem15	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597801	2541531	2538791	278031	275372	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC320.10	fft3	srp72	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597802	2541531	2538811	278031	275392	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC330.03c	fft3	SPCC330.03c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597803	2541531	2538714	278031	275298	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC330.11	fft3	btb1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597804	2541531	2538885	278031	275463	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC330.13	fft3	rpc37	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597805	2541531	2539538	278031	276100	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC364.06	fft3	nap1	snf2SR	nap11	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597806	2541531	2539467	278031	276030	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC417.07c	fft3	mto1	snf2SR	mbo1|mod20	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597807	2541531	2539295	278031	275863	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC417.08	fft3	tef3	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597808	2541531	2538837	278031	275418	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC4B3.03c	fft3	SPCC4B3.03c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597809	2541531	2539468	278031	276031	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC4B3.17	fft3	cbp3	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597810	2541531	2539367	278031	275933	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC4B3.18	fft3	ppc1	snf2SR	SPCC4B3.18	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597811	2541531	2539495	278031	276058	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC4F11.02	fft3	ptc1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597812	2541531	2539406	278031	275971	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC4G3.07c	fft3	phf1	snf2SR	saf50|swp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597813	2541531	2539541	278031	276103	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC4G3.13c	fft3	SPCC4G3.13c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597814	2541531	2539501	278031	276064	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC4G3.14	fft3	mdj1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597815	2541531	2538778	278031	275359	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC4G3.15c	fft3	not2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597816	2541531	2539463	278031	276026	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC550.11	fft3	SPCC550.11	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597817	2541531	2539425	278031	275990	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC550.14	fft3	vgl1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597818	2541531	2539475	278031	276038	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC553.02	fft3	qns1	snf2SR	SPCC553.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597819	2541531	2539405	278031	275970	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC553.03	fft3	pex1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597820	2541531	2539572	278031	276132	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC576.03c	fft3	tpx1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597821	2541531	2539539	278031	276101	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC576.10c	fft3	rpt3	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597822	2541531	2538821	278031	275402	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC584.01c	fft3	SPCC584.01c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597823	2541531	2539479	278031	276042	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC584.04	fft3	sup35	snf2SR	erf3	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597824	2541531	2538850	278031	275431	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC584.05	fft3	sec1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597825	2541531	2539284	278031	275852	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC584.15c	fft3	SPCC584.15c	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597826	2541531	2538708	278031	275292	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC594.01	fft3	SPCC594.01	snf2SR	SPCC736.16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597827	2541531	2539023	278031	275596	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC594.05c	fft3	spf1	snf2SR	spp1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597828	2541531	2539020	278031	275593	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC5E4.06	fft3	smc6	snf2SR	rad18	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597829	2541531	2539499	278031	276062	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC622.08c	fft3	hta1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597830	2541531	2539523	278031	276085	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC622.09	fft3	htb1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597831	2541531	2539147	278031	275719	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC622.12c	fft3	gdh1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597832	2541531	2539415	278031	275980	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC63.02c	fft3	aah3	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597833	2541531	2539461	278031	276024	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC63.08c	fft3	atg1	snf2SR	cvt10|ppk36	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597834	2541531	2539401	278031	275966	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC63.12c	fft3	pup3	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597835	2541531	2538827	278031	275408	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC63.14	fft3	eis1	snf2SR	SPCC63.14	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597836	2541531	2538820	278031	275401	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC70.05c	fft3	nnk1	snf2SR	SPCC70.05c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597837	2541531	2539567	278031	276127	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC70.06	fft3	SPCC70.06	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597838	2541531	2539540	278031	276102	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC736.12c	fft3	mmi1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597839	2541531	2539093	278031	275665	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC736.15	fft3	pil1	snf2SR	SPCC736.15	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597840	2541531	2539185	278031	275756	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC737.03c	fft3	ima1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597841	2541531	2539109	278031	275681	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC74.03c	fft3	ssp2	snf2SR	ucp9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597842	2541531	2539434	278031	275997	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC757.09c	fft3	rnc1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597843	2541531	2539088	278031	275660	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC777.05	fft3	gtr2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597844	2541531	2539416	278031	275981	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC777.10c	fft3	ubc12	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597845	2541531	2538797	278031	275378	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC794.07	fft3	lat1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597846	2541531	2539035	278031	275608	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC794.09c	fft3	tef101	snf2SR	ef1a-a|ef1a-e|efa11|tef1-e	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597847	2541531	2539421	278031	275986	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC794.11c	fft3	ent3	snf2SR	SPCC794.11c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597848	2541531	2539592	278031	276150	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC794.12c	fft3	mae2	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597849	2541531	2538725	278031	275309	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC825.02	fft3	gbs1	snf2SR	SPCC825.02|gls2beta	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597850	2541531	2539002	278031	275576	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC830.07c	fft3	psi1	snf2SR	psi	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597851	2541531	2539288	278031	275856	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC962.01	fft3	SPCC962.01	snf2SR	SPCP31B10.09	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597852	2541531	2539432	278031	275995	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC965.05c	fft3	thp1	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597853	2541531	2538905	278031	275482	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC970.08	fft3	SPCC970.08	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597854	2541531	2539311	278031	275878	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCP1E11.06	fft3	apl4	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597855	2541531	2538833	278031	275414	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCP1E11.11	fft3	puf6	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597856	2541531	2539569	278031	276129	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCPB16A4.03c	fft3	ade10	snf2SR	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Lee J (2017)	28218250	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597857	2539958	2541457	276502	277960	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC6G10.10c	zfs1	SPAC6G10.10c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597858	2539958	14217237	276502	4253599	SPBC1718.07c	SPNCRNA.1197	zfs1	SPNCRNA.1197	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597859	2539958	14217832	276502	4254194	SPBC1718.07c	SPNCRNA.1475	zfs1	SPNCRNA.1475	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597860	2539958	2539342	276502	275908	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC70.09c	zfs1	mug9	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597861	2539958	2539339	276502	275905	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC1494.03	zfs1	arz1	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597862	2539958	9407219	276502	1028582	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC8E4.12c	zfs1	ecl3	moc4	SPNG1995-96	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597863	2539958	2543666	276502	280080	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC644.06c	zfs1	cdr1	moc4	nim1	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597864	2539958	9407165	276502	1028528	SPBC1718.07c	SPNCRNA.210	zfs1	SPNCRNA.210	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597865	2539958	2540896	276502	277412	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC19C2.13c	zfs1	ctu2	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597866	2539958	2541938	276502	278425	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC8C9.16c	zfs1	mug63	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597867	2539958	2542116	276502	278592	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC1B3.15c	zfs1	SPAC1B3.15c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597868	2539958	2542200	276502	278675	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC19D5.01	zfs1	pyp2	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597869	2539958	2539119	276502	275691	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC1223.13	zfs1	cbf12	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597870	2539958	2540681	276502	277206	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC3H7.02	zfs1	SPBC3H7.02	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597871	2539958	2539211	276502	275781	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC1739.08c	zfs1	SPCC1739.08c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597872	2539958	9407239	276502	1028602	SPBC1718.07c	SPNCRNA.570	zfs1	SPNCRNA.570	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597873	2539958	14218374	276502	4254736	SPBC1718.07c	SPNCRNA.752	zfs1	SPNCRNA.752	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597874	2539958	2541688	276502	278184	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC25G10.04c	zfs1	rec10	moc4	rec20	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597875	2539958	2538751	276502	275334	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC1442.07c	zfs1	SPCC1442.07c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597876	2539958	2541715	276502	278210	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC110.01	zfs1	ppk1	moc4	SPAC140.05	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597877	2539958	2539465	276502	276028	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC4G3.10c	zfs1	rhp42	moc4	rhp4b	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597878	2539958	2542940	276502	279381	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC31A2.12	zfs1	SPAC31A2.12	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597879	2539958	9407279	276502	1028642	SPBC1718.07c	SPNCRNA.436	zfs1	SPNCRNA.436	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597880	2539958	14217498	276502	4253860	SPBC1718.07c	SPNCRNA.1678	zfs1	SPNCRNA.1678	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597881	2539958	2540654	276502	277179	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC19F5.01c	zfs1	puc1	moc4	SPBP8B7.32c	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597882	2539958	2540637	276502	277163	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC29A10.02	zfs1	spo5	moc4	SPBC365.18|mrb1|mug12	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597883	2539958	2540553	276502	277080	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC23G7.06c	zfs1	SPBC23G7.06c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597884	2539958	2540580	276502	277106	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC19C2.05	zfs1	ran1	moc4	pat1	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597885	2539958	2542103	276502	278579	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC31G5.11	zfs1	pac2	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597886	2539958	2540628	276502	277154	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC25B2.08	zfs1	SPBC25B2.08	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597887	2539958	2539296	276502	275864	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC1235.03	zfs1	cue2	moc4	SPCC1235.03	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597888	2539958	2539727	276502	276279	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC1685.13	zfs1	fhn1	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597889	2539958	2540969	276502	277485	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC30B4.01c	zfs1	wsc1	moc4	SPBC3D6.14c	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597890	2539958	2539558	276502	276119	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC548.03c	zfs1	wtf4	moc4	SPCC548.03|wtf13	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597891	2539958	2540370	276502	276899	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC27B12.09c	zfs1	SPBC27B12.09c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597892	2539958	2540107	276502	276644	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC106.08c	zfs1	mug2	moc4	B13958-1	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597893	2539958	2540242	276502	276774	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC32F12.07c	zfs1	SPBC32F12.07c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597894	2539958	2539304	276502	275872	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC584.16c	zfs1	SPCC584.16c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597895	2539958	2541842	276502	278333	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC27E2.11c	zfs1	SPAC27E2.11c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597896	2539958	2542317	276502	278783	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC16A10.01	zfs1	SPAC16A10.01	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597897	2539958	14217844	276502	4254206	SPBC1718.07c	SPNCRNA.1427	zfs1	SPNCRNA.1427	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597898	2539958	2540757	276502	277278	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC20F10.03	zfs1	SPBC20F10.03	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597899	2539958	2541775	276502	278269	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC23H3.04	zfs1	SPAC23H3.04	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597900	2539958	2540955	276502	277471	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC56F2.05c	zfs1	SPBC56F2.05c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597901	2539958	2541896	276502	278386	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC23H4.16c	zfs1	SPAC23H4.16c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597902	2539958	2543638	276502	280052	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC3H8.09c	zfs1	nab3	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597903	2539958	2541720	276502	278214	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC23H3.13c	zfs1	gpa2	moc4	git8	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597904	2539958	14217284	276502	4253646	SPBC1718.07c	SPNCRNA.1273	zfs1	SPNCRNA.1273	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597905	2539958	2540825	276502	277343	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC428.08c	zfs1	clr4	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597906	2539958	2541664	276502	278160	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC2H10.01	zfs1	SPAC2H10.01	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597907	2539958	2540742	276502	277265	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC19G7.08c	zfs1	art1	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597908	2539958	2539676	276502	276231	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC1347.12	zfs1	arp1	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597909	2539958	2540286	276502	276817	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC36.02c	zfs1	SPBC36.02c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597910	2539958	2538692	276502	275277	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC162.04c	zfs1	wtf13	moc4	wtf12	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597911	2539958	2541576	276502	278073	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC1348.02	zfs1	SPBC1348.02	moc4	SPAC1348.02	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597912	2539958	2540714	276502	277237	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC19C2.04c	zfs1	ubp11	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597913	2539958	2539259	276502	275829	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC553.05c	zfs1	wtf6	moc4	SPCC553.05c|SPCC553.05	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597914	2539958	2539201	276502	275772	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC188.09c	zfs1	pfl4	moc4	SPCC188.09c	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597915	2539958	2539091	276502	275663	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC285.07c	zfs1	wtf18	moc4	wtf5	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597916	2539958	14218047	276502	4254409	SPBC1718.07c	SPNCRNA.1059	zfs1	SPNCRNA.1059	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597917	2539958	2540148	276502	276685	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC16D10.04c	zfs1	dna2	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597918	2539958	2541509	276502	278011	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC6G9.05	zfs1	pcd1	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597919	2539958	2543157	276502	279588	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC3F10.12c	zfs1	SPAC3F10.12c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597920	2539958	2539080	276502	275652	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC1235.06	zfs1	sif1	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597921	2539958	2540952	276502	277468	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC354.09c	zfs1	SPBC354.09c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597922	2539958	14217430	276502	4253792	SPBC1718.07c	SPNCRNA.1367	zfs1	SPNCRNA.1367	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597923	2539958	2541068	276502	277583	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC530.11c	zfs1	SPBC530.11c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597924	2539958	14217491	276502	4253853	SPBC1718.07c	SPNCRNA.1391	zfs1	SPNCRNA.1391	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597925	2539958	2540942	276502	277458	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC3H7.14	zfs1	mug176	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597926	2539958	2541100	276502	277615	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC651.04	zfs1	SPBC651.04	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597927	2539958	2543222	276502	279650	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC821.08c	zfs1	slp1	moc4	cdc20	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597928	2539958	2540081	276502	276619	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC1685.07c	zfs1	avt5	moc4	avt8	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597929	2539958	2542177	276502	278652	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC17H9.08	zfs1	SPAC17H9.08	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597930	2539958	14217715	276502	4254077	SPBC1718.07c	SPNCRNA.1480	zfs1	SPNCRNA.1480	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597931	2539958	2543600	276502	280015	SPBC1718.07c	SPAPB1A10.05	zfs1	SPAPB1A10.05	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597932	2539958	3361466	276502	280542	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC959.10	zfs1	sen15	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597933	2539958	2539808	276502	276358	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC17D11.01	zfs1	nep1	moc4	SPBC20F10.11	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597934	2539958	2539239	276502	275809	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC1020.10	zfs1	oca2	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597935	2539958	2541421	276502	277927	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC14C4.10c	zfs1	SPAC14C4.10c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597936	2539958	2542808	276502	279256	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC15E1.07c	zfs1	moa1	moc4	mug159	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597937	2539958	2543358	276502	279780	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC688.10	zfs1	rev3	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597938	2539958	2541900	276502	278390	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC23H4.17c	zfs1	srb10	moc4	cdk8|prk1	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597939	2539958	2543678	276502	280092	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC637.11	zfs1	rpm2	moc4	pah1|suv3	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597940	2539958	2539004	276502	275578	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC4G3.05c	zfs1	mus81	moc4	slx3	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597941	2539958	2542997	276502	279435	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC11E3.14	zfs1	SPAC11E3.14	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597942	2539958	14217757	276502	4254119	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC30B4.09	zfs1	SPBC30B4.09	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597943	2539958	2540343	276502	276872	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC30B4.07c	zfs1	tfb4	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597944	2539958	2539213	276502	275783	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC285.10c	zfs1	SPCC285.10c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597945	2539958	3361262	276502	280338	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC691.01	zfs1	pfa5	moc4	pi035	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597946	2539958	2539757	276502	276309	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC1773.15	zfs1	dal52	moc4	SPBC1773.15|dal5h2	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597947	2539958	2540480	276502	277008	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC2A9.04c	zfs1	san1	moc4	SPBC2A9.04c	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597948	2539958	2540885	276502	277402	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC660.14	zfs1	mik1	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597949	2539958	2542113	276502	278589	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC1B3.11c	zfs1	ypt4	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597950	2539958	2541928	276502	278416	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC227.03c	zfs1	SPAC227.03c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597951	2539958	2540643	276502	277168	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC19G7.06	zfs1	mbx1	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597952	2539958	2541716	276502	278211	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC22F8.02c	zfs1	pvg5	moc4	mug50	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597953	2539958	2538694	276502	275279	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC191.09c	zfs1	gst1	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597954	2539958	2543208	276502	279637	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC328.04	zfs1	SPAC328.04	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597955	2539958	3361145	276502	280221	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC830.02	zfs1	wtf24	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597956	2539958	3361547	276502	280623	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC3A12.19	zfs1	SPAC3A12.19	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597957	2539958	2540293	276502	276824	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC21C3.03	zfs1	SPBC21C3.03	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597958	2539958	2541391	276502	277901	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC649.04	zfs1	uvi15	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597959	2539958	2540934	276502	277450	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC36.01c	zfs1	SPBC36.01c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597960	2539958	2540400	276502	276928	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC28F2.02	zfs1	mep33	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597961	2539958	5802905	276502	858043	SPBC1718.07c	SPNCRNA.01	zfs1	prl1	moc4	prl01	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597962	2539958	14217417	276502	4253779	SPBC1718.07c	SPNCRNA.1518	zfs1	SPNCRNA.1518	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597963	2539958	2542416	276502	278880	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC589.03c	zfs1	SPAC589.03c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597964	2539958	2540241	276502	276773	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC32H8.11	zfs1	mei4	moc4	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597965	2539958	2540903	276502	277419	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC530.05	zfs1	prt1	moc4	SPBC530.05	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597966	2539958	2540818	276502	277336	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC428.10	zfs1	SPBC428.10	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597967	2539958	14217766	276502	4254128	SPBC1718.07c	SPNCRNA.1689	zfs1	SPNCRNA.1689	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597968	2539958	2540001	276502	276545	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC1289.13c	zfs1	gmh6	moc4	SPBC1289.13c	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597969	2539958	3361406	276502	280482	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC19E9.03	zfs1	pas1	moc4	SPAC57A10.01	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597970	2539958	2539750	276502	276302	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC14F5.10c	zfs1	SPBC14F5.10c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597971	2539958	14217267	276502	4253629	SPBC1718.07c	SPNCRNA.1157	zfs1	SPNCRNA.1157	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597972	2539958	2543151	276502	279583	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC343.06c	zfs1	SPAC343.06c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597973	2539958	2542891	276502	279335	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC6F12.12	zfs1	par2	moc4	pbp2	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597974	2539958	2543190	276502	279619	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC31F12.01	zfs1	zds1	moc4	SPAC637.14|mug88	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597975	2539958	14218235	276502	4254597	SPBC1718.07c	SPNCRNA.1044	zfs1	SPNCRNA.1044	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597976	2539958	2542175	276502	278650	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC1F3.02c	zfs1	mkh1	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597977	2539958	2539437	276502	276000	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC645.06c	zfs1	rgf3	moc4	lad1	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597978	2539958	2541120	276502	277635	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC649.03	zfs1	rhp14	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597979	2539958	2539473	276502	276036	SPBC1718.07c	SPCP25A2.02c	zfs1	rhp26	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597980	2539958	2540992	276502	277508	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC342.05	zfs1	crb2	moc4	rhp9	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597981	2539958	3361432	276502	280508	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC2F3.01	zfs1	imt1	moc4	SPAC323.09	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597982	2539958	2539533	276502	276095	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC622.01c	zfs1	SPCC622.01c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597983	2539958	2539487	276502	276050	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC895.05	zfs1	for3	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597984	2539958	2540839	276502	277357	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC18H10.09	zfs1	SPBC18H10.09	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597985	2539958	14217305	276502	4253667	SPBC1718.07c	SPNCRNA.1299	zfs1	SPNCRNA.1299	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597986	2539958	14218168	276502	4254530	SPBC1718.07c	SPNCRNA.846	zfs1	SPNCRNA.846	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597987	2539958	2539557	276502	276118	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC553.04	zfs1	cyp9	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597988	2539958	2543275	276502	279703	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC1002.05c	zfs1	jmj2	moc4	kdm5	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597989	2539958	2539242	276502	275812	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC290.04	zfs1	ams2	moc4	SPCC4F11.01	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597990	2539958	2540258	276502	276789	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC32C12.02	zfs1	ste11	moc4	aff1|stex	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597991	2539958	2542875	276502	279320	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC13G7.02c	zfs1	ssa1	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597992	2539958	14218032	276502	4254394	SPBC1718.07c	SPNCRNA.865	zfs1	SPNCRNA.865	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597993	2539958	2539001	276502	275575	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC1494.08c	zfs1	SPCC1494.08c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597994	2539958	2538946	276502	275520	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC162.11c	zfs1	SPCC162.11c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597995	2539958	2539979	276502	276523	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC16A3.17c	zfs1	SPBC16A3.17c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597996	2539958	2542625	276502	279079	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC24H6.11c	zfs1	SPAC24H6.11c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597997	2539958	2539484	276502	276047	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC594.04c	zfs1	SPCC594.04c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597998	2539958	2542860	276502	279306	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC8C9.09c	zfs1	mug129	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2597999	2539958	14218092	276502	4254454	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC222.19	zfs1	tam1	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598000	2539958	2543437	276502	279857	SPBC1718.07c	SPAPB1A10.14	zfs1	pof15	moc4	SPAPB1A10.14	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598001	2539958	2539551	276502	276112	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC569.05c	zfs1	SPCC569.05c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598002	2539958	2539093	276502	275665	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC736.15	zfs1	pil1	moc4	SPCC736.15	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598003	2539958	2541746	276502	278240	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC20G4.04c	zfs1	hus1	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598004	2539958	14218145	276502	4254507	SPBC1718.07c	SPNCRNA.866	zfs1	SPNCRNA.866	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598005	2539958	2541604	276502	278101	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC14C4.03	zfs1	mek1	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598006	2539958	14217399	276502	4253761	SPBC1718.07c	SPNCRNA.1201	zfs1	SPNCRNA.1201	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598007	2539958	2539166	276502	275737	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC1620.02	zfs1	wtf23	moc4	wtf10	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598008	2539958	2540291	276502	276822	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC337.12	zfs1	red5	moc4	SPBC337.12	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598009	2539958	2543301	276502	279726	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC977.17	zfs1	SPAC977.17	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598010	2539958	2542509	276502	278967	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC3A11.09	zfs1	sod22	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598011	2539958	2541325	276502	277837	SPBC1718.07c	SPBP4H10.10	zfs1	SPBP4H10.10	moc4	rh2	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598012	2539958	2539156	276502	275728	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC1450.08c	zfs1	wtf16	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598013	2539958	2543499	276502	279917	SPBC1718.07c	SPAPB24D3.10c	zfs1	agl1	moc4	agl	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598014	2539958	2539094	276502	275666	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC330.02	zfs1	rhp7	moc4	SPCC613.14	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598015	2539958	2540666	276502	277191	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC215.04	zfs1	git11	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598016	2539958	2541025	276502	277540	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC3B9.06c	zfs1	atg3	moc4	apg3	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598017	2539958	2543639	276502	280053	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC458.03	zfs1	tel2	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598018	2539958	2542288	276502	278756	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC17G6.02c	zfs1	tco1	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598019	2539958	2540940	276502	277456	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC36.03c	zfs1	mfs3	moc4	SPBC36.03c	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598020	2539958	2543088	276502	279521	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC323.08	zfs1	rmp1	moc4	SPAC323.08	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598021	2539958	2543065	276502	279498	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC343.15	zfs1	tit1	moc4	mod5	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598022	2539958	2538927	276502	275503	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC1795.09	zfs1	yps1	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598023	2539958	2540306	276502	276836	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC2G5.02c	zfs1	ckb2	moc4	SPBC2G5.02c	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598024	2539958	2541709	276502	278204	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC3C7.02c	zfs1	pil2	moc4	SPAC3C7.02c	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598025	2539958	2538858	276502	275438	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC320.05	zfs1	SPCC320.05	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598026	2539958	2540410	276502	276938	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC2D10.04	zfs1	SPBC2D10.04	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598027	2539958	2543192	276502	279621	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC343.18	zfs1	rfp2	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598028	2539958	14217639	276502	4254001	SPBC1718.07c	SPNCRNA.1366	zfs1	SPNCRNA.1366	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598029	2539958	2541240	276502	277754	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC8D2.11	zfs1	SPBC8D2.11	moc4	pI054	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598030	2539958	2543237	276502	279665	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC6B12.02c	zfs1	mus7	moc4	mms22	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598031	2539958	2541475	276502	277977	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC24B11.09	zfs1	mpc2	moc4	SPAC24B11.09	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598032	2539958	2543055	276502	279489	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC806.06c	zfs1	SPAC806.06c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598033	2539958	2543006	276502	279444	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC11D3.17	zfs1	SPAC11D3.17	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598034	2539958	14218290	276502	4254652	SPBC1718.07c	SPNCRNA.873	zfs1	SPNCRNA.873	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598035	2539958	2539135	276502	275707	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC553.09c	zfs1	spb70	moc4	pol12	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598036	2539958	14218273	276502	4254635	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC959.11	zfs1	SPAC959.11	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598037	2539958	2538947	276502	275521	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC1682.12c	zfs1	ubp16	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598038	2539958	3361210	276502	280286	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC16E9.16c	zfs1	lsd90	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598039	2539958	2539249	276502	275819	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC1450.05c	zfs1	rox3	moc4	med19	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598040	2539958	2542858	276502	279304	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC13G6.12c	zfs1	chs1	moc4	SPAC24B11.01c	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598041	2539958	2542863	276502	279309	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC13G7.04c	zfs1	mac1	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598042	2539958	2539631	276502	276187	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC16G5.16	zfs1	SPBC16G5.16	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598043	2539958	2541670	276502	278166	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC24H6.13	zfs1	SPAC24H6.13	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598044	2539958	2540751	276502	277273	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC20F10.10	zfs1	psl1	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598045	2539958	2543604	276502	280019	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC823.06	zfs1	taf3	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598046	2539958	2543520	276502	279938	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC607.10	zfs1	spo3	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598047	2539958	2540416	276502	276944	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC30B4.02c	zfs1	SPBC30B4.02c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598048	2539958	2543514	276502	279932	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC4D7.03	zfs1	pop2	moc4	sud1	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598049	2539958	2539651	276502	276206	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC12D12.06	zfs1	srb11	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598050	2539958	5802957	276502	858095	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC9E9.02	zfs1	SPAC9E9.02	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598051	2539958	2543374	276502	279796	SPBC1718.07c	SPAPB1A10.08	zfs1	SPAPB1A10.08	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598052	2539958	2539257	276502	275827	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC1906.03	zfs1	wtf19	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598053	2539958	2541663	276502	278159	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC22G7.08	zfs1	ppk8	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598054	2539958	2542774	276502	279223	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC167.03c	zfs1	snu66	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598055	2539958	14217670	276502	4254032	SPBC1718.07c	SPNCRNA.1467	zfs1	SPNCRNA.1467	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598056	2539958	3361142	276502	280218	SPBC1718.07c	SPCC576.16c	zfs1	wtf22	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598057	2539958	2543071	276502	279504	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC3C7.06c	zfs1	pit1	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598058	2539958	2542536	276502	278993	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC18G6.09c	zfs1	SPAC18G6.09c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598059	2539958	2540943	276502	277459	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC36B7.02	zfs1	SPBC36B7.02	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598060	2539958	2542585	276502	279040	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC31A2.13c	zfs1	sft1	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598061	2539958	2540695	276502	277219	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC19G7.01c	zfs1	msh2	moc4	SPBC24C6.12c|mut3|swi8	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598062	2539958	2543251	276502	279679	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC3H1.11	zfs1	hsr1	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598063	2539958	2542474	276502	278934	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC31G5.09c	zfs1	spk1	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598064	2539958	2540186	276502	276719	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC13E7.02	zfs1	cwf24	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598065	2539958	2539977	276502	276521	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC4B4.08	zfs1	ght2	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598066	2539958	2540248	276502	276780	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC336.03	zfs1	efc25	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598067	2539958	2542524	276502	278982	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC32A11.01	zfs1	mug8	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598068	2539958	2542454	276502	278915	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC1399.01c	zfs1	SPAC1399.01c	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598069	2539958	3361468	276502	280544	SPBC1718.07c	SPAC26A3.01	zfs1	sxa1	moc4	SPAC2E1P5.06	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598070	2539958	14217286	276502	4253648	SPBC1718.07c	SPNCRNA.1297	zfs1	SPNCRNA.1297	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598071	2539958	14217658	276502	4254020	SPBC1718.07c	SPNCRNA.1356	zfs1	SPNCRNA.1356	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598072	2539958	2541033	276502	277548	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC3B9.21	zfs1	dcp1	moc4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598073	2539958	2540654	276502	277179	SPBC1718.07c	SPBC19F5.01c	zfs1	puc1	moc4	SPBP8B7.32c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic		29084823	284812	284812	High Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2598325	2541033	2542503	277548	278961	SPBC3B9.21	SPAC19A8.12	dcp1	dcp2	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Schuetz S (2017)	28472520	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598326	2539127	2539127	275699	275699	SPCC297.04c	SPCC297.04c	set7	set7	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Shen Y (2019)	30773398	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598327	2539127	2539127	275699	275699	SPCC297.04c	SPCC297.04c	set7	set7	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Shen Y (2019)	30773398	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598328	2539127	2539127	275699	275699	SPCC297.04c	SPCC297.04c	set7	set7	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Shen Y (2019)	30773398	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598331	2539127	2539804	275699	276354	SPCC297.04c	SPBC1105.11c	set7	hht3	-	h3.3	Biochemical Activity	physical	Shen Y (2019)	30773398	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Methylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598743	2539640	2542824	276195	279271	SPBC32F12.09	SPAC144.13c	rum1	srw1	-	ste9	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rubio A (2018)	30154212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression|resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
2598750	2539640	2540719	276195	277242	SPBC32F12.09	SPBC216.05	rum1	rad3	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rubio A (2018)	30154212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression|resistance to chemicals	genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2598751	2542824	2540719	279271	277242	SPAC144.13c	SPBC216.05	srw1	rad3	ste9	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rubio A (2018)	30154212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression|resistance to chemicals	genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2598752	2539640	2539869	276195	276415	SPBC32F12.09	SPBC11B10.09	rum1	cdc2	-	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Rubio A (2018)	30154212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue	genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2598753	2542824	2539869	279271	276415	SPAC144.13c	SPBC11B10.09	srw1	cdc2	ste9	cdk1|swo2|tws1|pi002|SPACTOKYO_453.34|wee2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Rubio A (2018)	30154212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue	genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2598756	2539640	2542696	276195	279149	SPBC32F12.09	SPAC29B12.03	rum1	spd1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Rubio A (2018)	30154212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue|cell size:partial rescue	genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2598757	2542824	2542696	279271	279149	SPAC144.13c	SPAC29B12.03	srw1	spd1	ste9	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Rubio A (2018)	30154212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression:partial rescue|cell size:partial rescue	genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2598758	2539640	2539737	276195	276289	SPBC32F12.09	SPBC16A3.07c	rum1	nrm1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Rubio A (2018)	30154212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue	Deletion of nrm1 rescues the genomic instability of rum1/ste9 mutant cells|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2598759	2542824	2539737	279271	276289	SPAC144.13c	SPBC16A3.07c	srw1	nrm1	ste9	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Rubio A (2018)	30154212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue	Deletion of nrm1 rescues the genomic instability of rum1/ste9 mutant cells|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2598760	2542824	2540072	279271	276610	SPAC144.13c	SPBC16H5.07c	srw1	ppa2	ste9	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Rubio A (2018)	30154212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue	genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2598761	2539640	2540072	276195	276610	SPBC32F12.09	SPBC16H5.07c	rum1	ppa2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Rubio A (2018)	30154212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:partial rescue	genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2598762	2542824	2538959	279271	275533	SPAC144.13c	SPCC18B5.11c	srw1	cds1	ste9	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rubio A (2018)	30154212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression|cell size|chromosome/plasmid maintenance	genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2598763	2539640	2538959	276195	275533	SPBC32F12.09	SPCC18B5.11c	rum1	cds1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rubio A (2018)	30154212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression|cell size|chromosome/plasmid maintenance	genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2598764	2539640	2539087	276195	275659	SPBC32F12.09	SPCC1259.13	rum1	chk1	-	rad27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rubio A (2018)	30154212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression|resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
2598765	2542824	2539087	279271	275659	SPAC144.13c	SPCC1259.13	srw1	chk1	ste9	rad27	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Rubio A (2018)	30154212	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression|resistance to chemicals	-	-	BIOGRID
2598766	2540719	2540381	277242	276910	SPBC216.05	SPBC25D12.04	rad3	suc22	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Xu YJ (2016)	27585850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	Figure 3|hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
2598767	2538959	2540381	275533	276910	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC25D12.04	cds1	suc22	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Xu YJ (2016)	27585850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	Figure 3|hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
2598768	2539087	2540381	275659	276910	SPCC1259.13	SPBC25D12.04	chk1	suc22	rad27	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Xu YJ (2016)	27585850	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	Figure 3|hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
2598773	2542388	2539180	278852	275751	SPAC1834.06c	SPCC16C4.09	pmo25	sts5	-	orb4	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nunez I (2016)	27474797	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Loss of Sts5 suppresses the cell viability defects of MOR mutants	-	BIOGRID
2598774	2539963	2539180	276507	275751	SPBC17F3.02	SPCC16C4.09	nak1	sts5	mor4|orb3	orb4	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nunez I (2016)	27474797	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Loss of Sts5 suppresses the cell viability defects of MOR mutants	-	BIOGRID
2598775	2543441	2539180	279861	275751	SPAC821.12	SPCC16C4.09	orb6	sts5	-	orb4	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nunez I (2016)	27474797	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Loss of Sts5 suppresses the cell viability defects of MOR mutants	-	BIOGRID
2598776	2541317	2539180	277829	275751	SPBP19A11.04c	SPCC16C4.09	mor2	sts5	cps12	orb4	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Nunez I (2016)	27474797	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	Loss of Sts5 suppresses the cell viability defects of MOR mutants	-	BIOGRID
2598777	2539180	2540248	275751	276780	SPCC16C4.09	SPBC336.03	sts5	efc25	orb4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Nunez I (2016)	27474797	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598778	2539180	2538951	275751	275525	SPCC16C4.09	SPCC297.03	sts5	ssp1	orb4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Nunez I (2016)	27474797	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598779	2539180	2543265	275751	279693	SPCC16C4.09	SPAC1002.13c	sts5	psu1	orb4	-	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Nunez I (2016)	27474797	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598780	2543441	2543265	279861	279693	SPAC821.12	SPAC1002.13c	orb6	psu1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Nunez I (2016)	27474797	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2598781	2543441	2539180	279861	275751	SPAC821.12	SPCC16C4.09	orb6	sts5	-	orb4	Biochemical Activity	physical	Nunez I (2016)	27474797	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2598782	2542029	2539180	278511	275751	SPAC8E11.02c	SPCC16C4.09	rad24	sts5	anr5|sam4	orb4	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Nunez I (2016)	27474797	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2599705	2542366	2543387	278830	279809	SPAC1783.04c	SPAPB1E7.02c	hst4	mcl1	-	slr3	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Konada L (2018)	29855479	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression in S phase:partial rescue|cell size:wild type|resistance to chemicals:partial rescue|vegetative growth:wild type	Mcl1 expression rescues the slow growth and elongated morphology phenotypes of hst4 mutants.	-	BIOGRID
2599706	2543387	2542366	279809	278830	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC1783.04c	mcl1	hst4	slr3	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Konada L (2018)	29855479	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals:partial rescue	deletion of hst4 partially rescues mcl1 mutant sensitivity to MMS	-	BIOGRID
2599707	2543387	2542467	279809	278928	SPAPB1E7.02c	SPAC1834.04	mcl1	hht1	slr3	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Konada L (2018)	29855479	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	expression of an acetylation resistant histone 3 inhibits the rescue of hst4 by mcl1	-	BIOGRID
2599708	2541972	2543639	278457	280053	SPAC23C11.11	SPAC458.03	cka1	tel2	orb5	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Inoue H (2017)	27935167	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2599709	2539480	2543639	276043	280053	SPCC622.13c	SPAC458.03	tti1	tel2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Inoue H (2017)	27935167	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2599710	2539771	2543639	276322	280053	SPBC1604.17c	SPAC458.03	tti2	tel2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Inoue H (2017)	27935167	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2599711	2539771	2539480	276322	276043	SPBC1604.17c	SPCC622.13c	tti2	tti1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Inoue H (2017)	27935167	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2599712	2539771	2539480	276322	276043	SPBC1604.17c	SPCC622.13c	tti2	tti1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Inoue H (2017)	27935167	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2599713	2539480	2543639	276043	280053	SPCC622.13c	SPAC458.03	tti1	tel2	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Inoue H (2017)	27935167	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2599714	2543639	2539480	280053	276043	SPAC458.03	SPCC622.13c	tel2	tti1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Inoue H (2017)	27935167	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2599715	2541077	2543639	277592	280053	SPBC83.08	SPAC458.03	rvb2	tel2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Inoue H (2017)	27935167	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2599716	2543539	2543639	279956	280053	SPAC926.04c	SPAC458.03	hsp90	tel2	git10|swo1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Inoue H (2017)	27935167	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2599717	2540720	2543639	277243	280053	SPBC216.07c	SPAC458.03	tor2	tel2	SPBC646.01c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Inoue H (2017)	27935167	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2599718	2541659	2543639	278155	280053	SPAC1F5.11c	SPAC458.03	tra2	tel2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Inoue H (2017)	27935167	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600049	2539469	2540730	276032	277253	SPCC790.03	SPBC19C2.09	rbd2	sre1	SPCC790.03	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kim J (2015)	26545776	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	metal resistance|vegetative growth	Figure 1|Sre1N|growth in the absence of oxygen, CoCl2	-	BIOGRID
2600050	2541065	2540730	277580	277253	SPBC3B9.15c	SPBC19C2.09	scp1	sre1	scap	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kim J (2015)	26545776	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	metal resistance|vegetative growth	Figure 1|Sre1N|growth in the absence of oxygen, CoCl2	-	BIOGRID
2600051	2541251	2540730	277765	277253	SPBC947.10	SPBC19C2.09	dsc1	sre1	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Kim J (2015)	26545776	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	metal resistance|vegetative growth	Figure 1|Sre1N|growth in the absence of oxygen, CoCl2	-	BIOGRID
2600058	2539206	2542972	275776	279411	SPCC24B10.07	SPAPYUG7.02c	gad8	sin1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Du W (2016)	26935949	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600059	2540473	2539206	277001	275776	SPBC30D10.10c	SPCC24B10.07	tor1	gad8	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Du W (2016)	26935949	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600110	2538930	2540825	275506	277343	SPCC188.13c	SPBC428.08c	dcr1	clr4	SPCC584.10c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Roche B (2016)	27738016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	Figure 3|clr4 deletion suppresses H3K9me2 enrichment at rDNA in dcr1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
2600111	2538930	2541582	275506	278079	SPCC188.13c	SPAC29E6.08	dcr1	tbp1	SPCC584.10c	SPAC30.12|tbp|tdf1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Roche B (2016)	27738016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	Figure 4|tbp1-D156Y mutation suppresses H3K9me2 at rDNA in dcr1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
2600112	2538930	2539504	275506	276067	SPCC188.13c	SPCP31B10.03c	dcr1	med31	SPCC584.10c	sep10|soh1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Roche B (2016)	27738016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	Figure 4|med31-ins mutation suppresses H3K9me2 at rDNA in dcr1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
2600113	2538930	2540097	275506	276635	SPCC188.13c	SPBC11C11.03	dcr1	ndc80	SPCC584.10c	ndc10|tid3	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Roche B (2016)	27738016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	entry into G0 (stationary phase)	Figure 2|allele-specific G0 suppressors of dcr1 from screen	-	BIOGRID
2600114	2538930	2540361	275506	276890	SPCC188.13c	SPBC2F12.13	dcr1	klp5	SPCC584.10c	sot1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Roche B (2016)	27738016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	entry into G0 (stationary phase)	Figure 2|allele-specific G0 suppressors of dcr1 from screen	-	BIOGRID
2600115	2538930	2539050	275506	275623	SPCC188.13c	SPCC11E10.08	dcr1	rik1	SPCC584.10c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Roche B (2016)	27738016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	entry into G0 (stationary phase)	Figure 2|allele-specific G0 suppressors of dcr1 from screen	-	BIOGRID
2600116	2538930	2539420	275506	275985	SPCC188.13c	SPCC970.07c	dcr1	raf2	SPCC584.10c	clr7|cmc2|dos2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Roche B (2016)	27738016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	entry into G0 (stationary phase)	Figure 2|allele-specific G0 suppressors of dcr1 from screen	-	BIOGRID
2600117	2538930	2540825	275506	277343	SPCC188.13c	SPBC428.08c	dcr1	clr4	SPCC584.10c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Roche B (2016)	27738016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	entry into G0 (stationary phase)	Figure 2|allele-specific G0 suppressors of dcr1 from screen	-	BIOGRID
2600118	2538930	2541633	275506	278129	SPCC188.13c	SPAC664.01c	dcr1	swi6	SPCC584.10c	SPAC824.10c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Roche B (2016)	27738016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	entry into G0 (stationary phase)	Figure 2|allele-specific G0 suppressors of dcr1 from screen	-	BIOGRID
2600119	2538930	2541582	275506	278079	SPCC188.13c	SPAC29E6.08	dcr1	tbp1	SPCC584.10c	SPAC30.12|tbp|tdf1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Roche B (2016)	27738016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	entry into G0 (stationary phase)	Figure 2|allele-specific G0 suppressors of dcr1 from screen	-	BIOGRID
2600120	2538930	2539504	275506	276067	SPCC188.13c	SPCP31B10.03c	dcr1	med31	SPCC584.10c	sep10|soh1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Roche B (2016)	27738016	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	entry into G0 (stationary phase)	Figure 2|allele-specific G0 suppressors of dcr1 from screen	-	BIOGRID
2600124	2540291	2541602	276822	278099	SPBC337.12	SPAC1F5.10	red5	SPAC1F5.10	SPBC337.12	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Marayati BF (2016)	27365210	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600126	2540522	2541602	277050	278099	SPBC3B9.08c	SPAC1F5.10	mnh1	SPAC1F5.10	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Marayati BF (2016)	27365210	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600127	2539695	2541602	276249	278099	SPBC13G1.14c	SPAC1F5.10	SPBC13G1.14c	SPAC1F5.10	SPBC25D12.07c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Marayati BF (2016)	27365210	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600128	2541998	2541602	278482	278099	SPAC23A1.09	SPAC1F5.10	SPAC23A1.09	SPAC1F5.10	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Marayati BF (2016)	27365210	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600151	2540691	2540719	277216	277242	SPBC20F10.05	SPBC216.05	nrl1	rad3	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure S6|bleocin-sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
2600152	2540691	2543086	277216	279519	SPBC20F10.05	SPAC30D11.10	nrl1	rad52	-	rad22|rad22A	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure S6|bleocin-sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
2600154	2540691	2542837	277216	279283	SPBC20F10.05	SPAC140.04	nrl1	ctr1	-	SPAC140.04	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600155	2540691	2542173	277216	278648	SPBC20F10.05	SPAC17H9.02	nrl1	mtl1	-	SPAC17H9.02	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600157	2540691	2543413	277216	279835	SPBC20F10.05	SPAC4F8.12c	nrl1	spp42	-	cwf6	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600158	2540691	2543676	277216	280090	SPBC20F10.05	SPAC9.03c	nrl1	brr2	-	spp41	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600159	2540691	2542910	277216	279353	SPBC20F10.05	SPAC1486.03c	nrl1	SPAC1486.03c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600160	2540691	2540057	277216	276595	SPBC20F10.05	SPBC16H5.10c	nrl1	prp43	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600161	2540691	2542978	277216	279416	SPBC20F10.05	SPAC10F6.02c	nrl1	prp22	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600162	2540691	2540006	277216	276550	SPBC20F10.05	SPBC1711.17	nrl1	prp16	-	SPBC17G9.01	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600163	2540691	2540711	277216	277234	SPBC20F10.05	SPBC215.12	nrl1	cwf10	-	snu114|spef2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600164	2540691	2542256	277216	278726	SPBC20F10.05	SPAC29A4.08c	nrl1	prp19	-	cwf8	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600165	2540691	2542000	277216	278484	SPBC20F10.05	SPAC20H4.06c	nrl1	SPAC20H4.06c	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600166	2540691	2543583	277216	279998	SPBC20F10.05	SPAC644.12	nrl1	cdc5	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600167	2540691	2539941	277216	276485	SPBC20F10.05	SPBC13E7.01	nrl1	cwf22	-	SPBC15D4.16	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600168	2540691	2541168	277216	277683	SPBC20F10.05	SPBC6B1.10	nrl1	prp17	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600169	2540691	2538988	277216	275562	SPBC20F10.05	SPCC188.11	nrl1	prp45	-	SPCC584.08|cwf13|snw1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600170	2540691	2539984	277216	276528	SPBC20F10.05	SPBC1289.11	nrl1	spf38	-	cwf17	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600171	2540691	2539470	277216	276033	SPBC20F10.05	SPCC576.11	nrl1	rpl15	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600172	2540691	2542370	277216	278834	SPBC20F10.05	SPAC1783.08c	nrl1	rpl1502	-	rpl15-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600173	2540691	2538974	277216	275548	SPBC20F10.05	SPCC550.02c	nrl1	cwf5	-	ecm2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600174	2540691	2542263	277216	278732	SPBC20F10.05	SPAC17A2.08c	nrl1	ntr2	-	SPAC17A2.08c	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600175	2540691	2540884	277216	277401	SPBC20F10.05	SPBC19C2.14	nrl1	smd3	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600176	2540691	2539013	277216	275586	SPBC20F10.05	SPCC364.03	nrl1	rpl1702	-	rpl17|rpl17-2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600177	2540691	2543616	277216	280030	SPBC20F10.05	SPAC4A8.09c	nrl1	cwf21	-	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600178	2540691	2540753	277216	277274	SPBC20F10.05	SPBC211.02c	nrl1	cwf3	-	syf1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600179	2540691	2542480	277216	278940	SPBC20F10.05	SPAC2C4.03c	nrl1	smd2	-	cwf9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600180	2540691	2542173	277216	278648	SPBC20F10.05	SPAC17H9.02	nrl1	mtl1	-	SPAC17H9.02	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600181	2540691	2542837	277216	279283	SPBC20F10.05	SPAC140.04	nrl1	ctr1	-	SPAC140.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600182	2540691	2542263	277216	278732	SPBC20F10.05	SPAC17A2.08c	nrl1	ntr2	-	SPAC17A2.08c	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600183	2540691	2540328	277216	276858	SPBC20F10.05	SPBC31F10.11c	nrl1	cwf4	-	syf3	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600184	2542173	2540691	278648	277216	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC20F10.05	mtl1	nrl1	SPAC17H9.02	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600185	2542173	2543676	278648	280090	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC9.03c	mtl1	brr2	SPAC17H9.02	spp41	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600186	2542173	2542910	278648	279353	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC1486.03c	mtl1	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC17H9.02	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600187	2542173	2542263	278648	278732	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC17A2.08c	mtl1	ntr2	SPAC17H9.02	SPAC17A2.08c	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600188	2542173	2540753	278648	277274	SPAC17H9.02	SPBC211.02c	mtl1	cwf3	SPAC17H9.02	syf1	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600189	2542837	2540691	279283	277216	SPAC140.04	SPBC20F10.05	ctr1	nrl1	SPAC140.04	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600190	2542837	2542837	279283	279283	SPAC140.04	SPAC140.04	ctr1	ctr1	SPAC140.04	SPAC140.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600191	2542837	2543676	279283	280090	SPAC140.04	SPAC9.03c	ctr1	brr2	SPAC140.04	spp41	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600192	2542837	2540753	279283	277274	SPAC140.04	SPBC211.02c	ctr1	cwf3	SPAC140.04	syf1	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600193	2543676	2542173	280090	278648	SPAC9.03c	SPAC17H9.02	brr2	mtl1	spp41	SPAC17H9.02	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600194	2543676	2542837	280090	279283	SPAC9.03c	SPAC140.04	brr2	ctr1	spp41	SPAC140.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600195	2543676	2542263	280090	278732	SPAC9.03c	SPAC17A2.08c	brr2	ntr2	spp41	SPAC17A2.08c	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600196	2543676	2540328	280090	276858	SPAC9.03c	SPBC31F10.11c	brr2	cwf4	spp41	syf3	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600197	2540057	2542263	276595	278732	SPBC16H5.10c	SPAC17A2.08c	prp43	ntr2	-	SPAC17A2.08c	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600198	2540057	2540328	276595	276858	SPBC16H5.10c	SPBC31F10.11c	prp43	cwf4	-	syf3	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600199	2542910	2543676	279353	280090	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC9.03c	SPAC1486.03c	brr2	-	spp41	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600200	2542910	2542263	279353	278732	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC17A2.08c	SPAC1486.03c	ntr2	-	SPAC17A2.08c	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600201	2542263	2540691	278732	277216	SPAC17A2.08c	SPBC20F10.05	ntr2	nrl1	SPAC17A2.08c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600202	2542263	2542173	278732	278648	SPAC17A2.08c	SPAC17H9.02	ntr2	mtl1	SPAC17A2.08c	SPAC17H9.02	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600203	2542263	2542837	278732	279283	SPAC17A2.08c	SPAC140.04	ntr2	ctr1	SPAC17A2.08c	SPAC140.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600204	2542263	2543676	278732	280090	SPAC17A2.08c	SPAC9.03c	ntr2	brr2	SPAC17A2.08c	spp41	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600205	2542263	2540057	278732	276595	SPAC17A2.08c	SPBC16H5.10c	ntr2	prp43	SPAC17A2.08c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600206	2542263	2542910	278732	279353	SPAC17A2.08c	SPAC1486.03c	ntr2	SPAC1486.03c	SPAC17A2.08c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600207	2542263	2542263	278732	278732	SPAC17A2.08c	SPAC17A2.08c	ntr2	ntr2	SPAC17A2.08c	SPAC17A2.08c	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600208	2542263	2540753	278732	277274	SPAC17A2.08c	SPBC211.02c	ntr2	cwf3	SPAC17A2.08c	syf1	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600209	2542263	2540328	278732	276858	SPAC17A2.08c	SPBC31F10.11c	ntr2	cwf4	SPAC17A2.08c	syf3	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600210	2540753	2542837	277274	279283	SPBC211.02c	SPAC140.04	cwf3	ctr1	syf1	SPAC140.04	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600211	2540753	2542263	277274	278732	SPBC211.02c	SPAC17A2.08c	cwf3	ntr2	syf1	SPAC17A2.08c	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600212	2540328	2540691	276858	277216	SPBC31F10.11c	SPBC20F10.05	cwf4	nrl1	syf3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600213	2540328	2543676	276858	280090	SPBC31F10.11c	SPAC9.03c	cwf4	brr2	syf3	spp41	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600214	2540328	2540057	276858	276595	SPBC31F10.11c	SPBC16H5.10c	cwf4	prp43	syf3	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600215	2540328	2542263	276858	278732	SPBC31F10.11c	SPAC17A2.08c	cwf4	ntr2	syf3	SPAC17A2.08c	Two-hybrid	physical	Aronica L (2016)	26682798	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Table S2	-	BIOGRID
2600903	2539733	2539971	276285	276515	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC1105.04c	pab2	cbp1	-	abp1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Mallet PL (2017)	28007890	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2600904	2539733	2539971	276285	276515	SPBC16E9.12c	SPBC1105.04c	pab2	cbp1	-	abp1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mallet PL (2017)	28007890	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2600905	2539733	2543630	276285	280044	SPBC16E9.12c	SPAC1F3.01	pab2	rrp6	-	SPAC3H8.11	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Mallet PL (2017)	28007890	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2600933	2542703	2541746	279156	278240	SPAC26H5.06	SPAC20G4.04c	pot1	hus1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Shamim HM (2017)	29121084	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation|chromosome/plasmid maintenance|resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2600934	2542703	2542558	279156	279014	SPAC26H5.06	SPAC1952.07	pot1	rad1	-	rad19	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Shamim HM (2017)	29121084	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2600935	2542703	2543544	279156	279961	SPAC26H5.06	SPAC664.07c	pot1	rad9	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Shamim HM (2017)	29121084	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2600936	2541940	2540051	278427	276589	SPAC27F1.02c	SPBC32H8.12c	cdc8	act1	fus4	cps8|pi012	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Christensen JR (2017)	28282023	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600937	2541940	2541940	278427	278427	SPAC27F1.02c	SPAC27F1.02c	cdc8	cdc8	fus4	fus4	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Christensen JR (2017)	28282023	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600938	2539765	2540051	276316	276589	SPBC1778.06c	SPBC32H8.12c	fim1	act1	-	cps8|pi012	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Christensen JR (2017)	28282023	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600939	2541738	2540051	278232	276589	SPAC20G4.06c	SPBC32H8.12c	adf1	act1	cof1	cps8|pi012	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Christensen JR (2017)	28282023	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600940	2539527	2542914	276089	279356	SPCC338.16	SPAC57A10.05c	pof3	pof1	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Qiu C (2018)	29361524	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size|protein/peptide accumulation|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2600944	2539527	2540917	276089	277433	SPCC338.16	SPBC409.05	pof3	skp1	-	psh1|sph1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Qiu C (2018)	29361524	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2600945	2542914	2540917	279356	277433	SPAC57A10.05c	SPBC409.05	pof1	skp1	-	psh1|sph1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Qiu C (2018)	29361524	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2600946	2539123	2539527	275695	276089	SPCC18B5.03	SPCC338.16	wee1	pof3	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Qiu C (2018)	29361524	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600947	2539123	2542914	275695	279356	SPCC18B5.03	SPAC57A10.05c	wee1	pof1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Qiu C (2018)	29361524	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600948	2539527	2539123	276089	275695	SPCC338.16	SPCC18B5.03	pof3	wee1	-	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Qiu C (2018)	29361524	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2600949	2542914	2539123	279356	275695	SPAC57A10.05c	SPCC18B5.03	pof1	wee1	-	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Qiu C (2018)	29361524	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2600950	2540917	2539123	277433	275695	SPBC409.05	SPCC18B5.03	skp1	wee1	psh1|sph1	-	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Qiu C (2018)	29361524	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2600951	2539087	2538959	275659	275533	SPCC1259.13	SPCC18B5.11c	chk1	cds1	rad27	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Coulton N (2017)	29092815	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals	Figure 5|hydroxyurea	-	BIOGRID
2600952	2542632	2539123	279086	275695	SPAC24H6.05	SPCC18B5.03	cdc25	wee1	sal2	-	Dosage Lethality	genetic	Qiu C (2018)	29361524	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2600953	2540917	2542632	277433	279086	SPBC409.05	SPAC24H6.05	skp1	cdc25	psh1|sph1	sal2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Qiu C (2018)	29361524	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2600954	2539527	2542632	276089	279086	SPCC338.16	SPAC24H6.05	pof3	cdc25	-	sal2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Qiu C (2018)	29361524	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2600955	2542862	2539403	279308	275968	SPAC140.03	SPCC736.11	arb1	ago1	-	csp9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Okazaki K (2018)	29866182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600956	2540735	2539403	277258	275968	SPBC83.03c	SPCC736.11	tas3	ago1	-	csp9	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Okazaki K (2018)	29866182	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600957	2539155	2538736	275727	275320	SPCC1020.02	SPCC1322.12c	spc7	bub1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Yuan I (2017)	28017606	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600958	2539155	2541856	275727	278347	SPCC1020.02	SPAC23H3.08c	spc7	bub3	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Yuan I (2017)	28017606	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600959	2539155	2539219	275727	275789	SPCC1020.02	SPCC1795.01c	spc7	mad3	-	SPCC895.02	Co-localization	physical	Yuan I (2017)	28017606	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600960	2539155	2540060	275727	276598	SPCC1020.02	SPBC106.01	spc7	mph1	-	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Yuan I (2017)	28017606	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell cycle progression	-	-	BIOGRID
2600961	2540589	2540392	277115	276920	SPBC20F10.06	SPBC365.15	mad2	alp4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yuan I (2017)	28017606	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600962	2538736	2540320	275320	276850	SPCC1322.12c	SPBC3D6.04c	bub1	mad1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yuan I (2017)	28017606	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600963	2538736	2540589	275320	277115	SPCC1322.12c	SPBC20F10.06	bub1	mad2	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Yuan I (2017)	28017606	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600964	2540475	9407016	277003	1028379	SPBC30D10.06	SPNCRNA.214	lsm4	ter1	-	SPNG585	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Paez-Moscoso DJ (2018)	29422664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600965	2540723	9407016	277246	1028379	SPBC20F10.09	SPNCRNA.214	lsm5	ter1	-	SPNG585	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Paez-Moscoso DJ (2018)	29422664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600966	2539607	9407016	276165	1028379	SPBC11G11.06c	SPNCRNA.214	sme1	ter1	-	SPNG585	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Paez-Moscoso DJ (2018)	29422664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600967	2542684	9407016	279137	1028379	SPAC26A3.08	SPNCRNA.214	smb1	ter1	smb	SPNG585	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Paez-Moscoso DJ (2018)	29422664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600968	2542194	9407016	278669	1028379	SPAC17G6.17	SPNCRNA.214	pof8	ter1	-	SPNG585	Affinity Capture-RNA	physical	Paez-Moscoso DJ (2018)	29422664	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2600969	2540106	2541620	276643	278117	SPBC12D12.09	SPAC2G11.12	rev7	rqh1	SPAC12D12.09	hus2|rad12|rec9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Leland BA (2018)	29697047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2600970	2540348	2540106	276877	276643	SPBC29A10.05	SPBC12D12.09	exo1	rev7	mut2	SPAC12D12.09	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Leland BA (2018)	29697047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2600971	2540992	2541620	277508	278117	SPBC342.05	SPAC2G11.12	crb2	rqh1	rhp9	hus2|rad12|rec9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Leland BA (2018)	29697047	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2600972	2539087	2540627	275659	277153	SPCC1259.13	SPBC25H2.13c	chk1	cdc20	rad27	pol2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Coulton N (2017)	29092815	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Figure 6|chk1-S173A cdc20.M10	-	BIOGRID
2600973	2539087	2540255	275659	276786	SPCC1259.13	SPBC336.04	chk1	cdc6	rad27	mis10|pol3|pold	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Coulton N (2017)	29092815	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 6|MMS|chk1-S173A cdc6.23	-	BIOGRID
2600989	2540766	3361404	277286	280480	SPBC19C2.02	SPATRNAASP.01	pmt1	SPATRNAASP.01	-	-	Protein-RNA	physical	Johannsson S (2018)	29892076	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2602194	2539123	2542047	275695	278528	SPCC18B5.03	SPAC21E11.03c	wee1	pcr1	-	mts2	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Bandyopadhyay S (2017)	28645196	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size|mitotic cell cycle|vegetative growth	Pcr1 overexpression rescued cells from premature mitosis and increased the length of wee1 cells from 6.9 to 8.9 um	-	BIOGRID
2602195	2539123	2542047	275695	278528	SPCC18B5.03	SPAC21E11.03c	wee1	pcr1	-	mts2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bandyopadhyay S (2017)	28645196	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size|mitotic cell cycle	Pcr1 overexpression rescued cells from premature mitosis and increased the length of wee1 cells from 6.9 to 8.9 um	-	BIOGRID
2602200	2542632	2540329	279086	276859	SPAC24H6.05	SPBC29B5.01	cdc25	atf1	sal2	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Bandyopadhyay S (2017)	28645196	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2602216	2539666	2538736	276221	275320	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC1322.12c	eso1	bub1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Lin SJ (2016)	27798241	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spindle morphology:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2602217	2539666	2540589	276221	277115	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC20F10.06	eso1	mad2	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Lin SJ (2016)	27798241	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spindle morphology:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2602218	2539666	2539020	276221	275593	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC5E4.06	eso1	smc6	-	rad18	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Lin SJ (2016)	27798241	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spindle morphology:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2602219	2539666	2539020	276221	275593	SPBC16A3.11	SPCC5E4.06	eso1	smc6	-	rad18	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Lin SJ (2016)	27798241	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:partial rescue	eso1 and smc6 exhibit co-suppression	-	BIOGRID
2602220	2538736	2539020	275320	275593	SPCC1322.12c	SPCC5E4.06	bub1	smc6	-	rad18	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Lin SJ (2016)	27798241	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth:wild type	mutation of smc6 blocks rescue of eso1 by bub1	-	BIOGRID
2602221	2539020	2543010	275593	279448	SPCC5E4.06	SPAC10F6.09c	smc6	psm3	rad18	smc3	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Lin SJ (2016)	27798241	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2603079	2539352	2542244	275918	278714	SPCC188.07	SPAC19G12.13c	ccq1	poz1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Scott H (2017)	28807855	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603080	2542414	2542244	278878	278714	SPAC6F6.16c	SPAC19G12.13c	tpz1	poz1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Scott H (2017)	28807855	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603081	2542414	2539352	278878	275918	SPAC6F6.16c	SPCC188.07	tpz1	ccq1	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Scott H (2017)	28807855	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603082	2541071	2539686	277586	276241	SPBC582.05c	SPBC1734.06	brc1	rhp18	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Reubens MC (2017)	28784724	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603085	2541071	2539686	277586	276241	SPBC582.05c	SPBC1734.06	brc1	rhp18	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Reubens MC (2017)	28784724	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603086	2539020	2541071	275593	277586	SPCC5E4.06	SPBC582.05c	smc6	brc1	rad18	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Reubens MC (2017)	28784724	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 4|smc6-74 MMS-sensitivity is rescued by brc1+ overexpression	-	BIOGRID
2603087	2539020	2539499	275593	276062	SPCC5E4.06	SPCC622.08c	smc6	hta1	rad18	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Reubens MC (2017)	28784724	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 4|smc6-74 htaAQ	-	BIOGRID
2603088	2539020	2542226	275593	278699	SPCC5E4.06	SPAC19G12.06c	smc6	hta2	rad18	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Reubens MC (2017)	28784724	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 4|smc6-74 htaAQ	-	BIOGRID
2603089	2541268	2540191	277782	276724	SPBP19A11.03c	SPBC17D11.07c	mts4	rpn2	rpn1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603090	2541268	2540109	277782	276646	SPBP19A11.03c	SPBC119.01	mts4	rpn3	rpn1	SPBPJ4664.07	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603091	2541268	2539862	277782	276409	SPBP19A11.03c	SPBC16C6.07c	mts4	rpt1	rpn1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603092	2541268	2540939	277782	277455	SPBP19A11.03c	SPBC4.07c	mts4	rpt2	rpn1	mts2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603093	2541268	2539539	277782	276101	SPBP19A11.03c	SPCC576.10c	mts4	rpt3	rpn1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603094	2541268	2539189	277782	275760	SPBP19A11.03c	SPCC1682.16	mts4	rpt4	rpn1	SPCC306.01	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603095	2541268	2542907	277782	279351	SPBP19A11.03c	SPAC1420.03	mts4	rpn501	rpn1	rpn5|rpn5-a	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603096	2541268	2541807	277782	278298	SPBP19A11.03c	SPAC23G3.11	mts4	rpn6	rpn1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603097	2541268	2540794	277782	277313	SPBP19A11.03c	SPBC582.07c	mts4	rpn7	rpn1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603098	2541268	2538912	277782	275489	SPBP19A11.03c	SPCC1682.10	mts4	rpn8	rpn1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603099	2541268	2543114	277782	279546	SPBP19A11.03c	SPAC607.05	mts4	rpn9	rpn1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603100	2541268	2539182	277782	275753	SPBP19A11.03c	SPCC16A11.16c	mts4	rpn1302	rpn1	rpn13|rpn13b	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603101	2541268	2543040	277782	279475	SPBP19A11.03c	SPAC31G5.13	mts4	rpn11	rpn1	bfr2|mts5|pad1|sks1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603102	2541268	2540025	277782	276569	SPBP19A11.03c	SPBC16G5.01	mts4	rpn12	rpn1	SPBC342.07|mts3	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603103	2541268	2540980	277782	277496	SPBP19A11.03c	SPBC342.04	mts4	rpn1301	rpn1	rpn13|rpn13a	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603104	2541268	2543682	277782	280096	SPBP19A11.03c	SPAC637.10c	mts4	rpn10	rpn1	pus1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603105	2541268	2543122	277782	279554	SPBP19A11.03c	SPAC31A2.04c	mts4	pre1	rpn1	SPAC31A2.04c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603106	2541268	2543623	277782	280037	SPBP19A11.03c	SPAC4A8.13c	mts4	pts1	rpn1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603107	2541268	2540878	277782	277395	SPBP19A11.03c	SPBC4C3.10c	mts4	pre3	rpn1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603108	2541268	2540875	277782	277392	SPBP19A11.03c	SPBC577.10	mts4	pre4	rpn1	SPBC577.10	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603109	2541268	2542559	277782	279015	SPBP19A11.03c	SPAC6G10.04c	mts4	pre5	rpn1	SPAC6G10.04c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603110	2541268	2540175	277782	276708	SPBP19A11.03c	SPBC106.16	mts4	pre6	rpn1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603111	2541268	2542062	277782	278540	SPBP19A11.03c	SPAC22F8.06	mts4	pam1	rpn1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603112	2541268	2539026	277782	275599	SPBP19A11.03c	SPCC1442.06	mts4	pre8	rpn1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603113	2541268	3361518	277782	280594	SPBP19A11.03c	SPAC13C5.01c	mts4	pre9	rpn1	SPAC13C5.01c|SPAC31A2.17c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603114	2541268	2539378	277782	275944	SPBP19A11.03c	SPCC1795.04c	mts4	pre10	rpn1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603115	2541268	2541805	277782	278296	SPBP19A11.03c	SPAC23D3.07	mts4	pup1	rpn1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603116	2541268	2543205	277782	279634	SPBP19A11.03c	SPAC323.02c	mts4	pup2	rpn1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603117	2541268	2539401	277782	275966	SPBP19A11.03c	SPCC63.12c	mts4	pup3	rpn1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2603118	2539189	2539726	275760	276278	SPCC1682.16	SPBC13E7.08c	rpt4	leo1	SPCC306.01	SPBC13E7.08c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	Figure 4|heterochromatin spreading|rpt4-1	-	BIOGRID
2603119	2539189	2543426	275760	279846	SPCC1682.16	SPAC631.02	rpt4	bdf2	SPCC306.01	SPAC631.02|nrc1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	Figure 4|heterochromatin spreading|rpt4-1	-	BIOGRID
2603120	2539403	2539189	275968	275760	SPCC736.11	SPCC1682.16	ago1	rpt4	csp9	SPCC306.01	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation|chromosome/plasmid maintenance|protein/peptide distribution|protein/peptide modification	Figure 5|increased silencing|rpt4-1	-	BIOGRID
2603121	2538930	2539189	275506	275760	SPCC188.13c	SPCC1682.16	dcr1	rpt4	SPCC584.10c	SPCC306.01	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Seo HD (2017)	28784663	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	Figure 5|increased silencing|rpt4-1	-	BIOGRID
2605649	2540494	2541667	277022	278163	SPBC409.04c	SPAC29E6.04	mis12	nnf1	-	SPAC30.08	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Zhou X (2017)	29180432	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2605665	2539620	2540494	276178	277022	SPBC1861.01c	SPBC409.04c	cnp3	mis12	SPBC56F2.13	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Zhou X (2017)	29180432	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2605666	2539620	2541667	276178	278163	SPBC1861.01c	SPAC29E6.04	cnp3	nnf1	SPBC56F2.13	SPAC30.08	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Zhou X (2017)	29180432	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2605667	3361036	2539620	280112	276178	SPCC320.13c	SPBC1861.01c	ark1	cnp3	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	SPBC56F2.13	Biochemical Activity	physical	Zhou X (2017)	29180432	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2605681	2541861	2540043	278351	276581	SPAC5D6.08c	SPBC1198.12	mes1	mfr1	-	SPBC660.02|fzr1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chikashige Y (2017)	28245054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2605682	2543222	2540043	279650	276581	SPAC821.08c	SPBC1198.12	slp1	mfr1	cdc20	SPBC660.02|fzr1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chikashige Y (2017)	28245054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:wild type	deletion of both fzr1 and mes1 in an slp1 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2605683	2543222	2541861	279650	278351	SPAC821.08c	SPAC5D6.08c	slp1	mes1	cdc20	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chikashige Y (2017)	28245054	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	meiosis:wild type	deletion of both fzr1 and mes1 in an slp1 mutant|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2605684	2540494	2539620	277022	276178	SPBC409.04c	SPBC1861.01c	mis12	cnp3	-	SPBC56F2.13	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zhou X (2017)	29180432	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2605685	3361036	2541047	280112	277562	SPCC320.13c	SPBC409.09c	ark1	mis13	SPCC330.16|aim1|SPCC320.12c	cnl1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Zhou X (2017)	29180432	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2605686	2540582	2542123	277108	278599	SPBC26H8.07c	SPAC18G6.15	nda3	mal3	alp12|ben1	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	von Loeffelholz O (2017)	29235477	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	cryo EM	-	BIOGRID
2605687	2540582	2539864	277108	276411	SPBC26H8.07c	SPBC16A3.15c	nda3	nda2	alp12|ben1	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	von Loeffelholz O (2017)	29235477	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	cryo EM	-	BIOGRID
2605688	2539864	2542123	276411	278599	SPBC16A3.15c	SPAC18G6.15	nda2	mal3	-	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	von Loeffelholz O (2017)	29235477	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	cryo EM	-	BIOGRID
2605689	2542113	2540571	278589	277098	SPAC1B3.11c	SPBC28E12.06c	ypt4	lvs1	-	SPBC3H7.16	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Rains A (2017)	28944093	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vacuolar morphology	Figure 3|lvs1-YFP overexpression rescues vacuolar size in ypt4 deletion	-	BIOGRID
2605690	2541614	2540295	278111	276826	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC3B8.05	elp3	SPBC3B8.05	kat9	dph1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Villahermosa D (2017)	28775286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 2|sensitivity to TBZ, rapamycin, 37 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2605691	2541614	2543434	278111	279854	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC8F11.02c	elp3	dph3	kat9	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Villahermosa D (2017)	28775286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 2|Figure 5|sensitivity to TBZ, rapamycin, 37 degrees	-	BIOGRID
2605692	2541614	2540295	278111	276826	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC3B8.05	elp3	SPBC3B8.05	kat9	dph1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Villahermosa D (2017)	28775286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	Figure 3	-	BIOGRID
2605693	2541614	2543434	278111	279854	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC8F11.02c	elp3	dph3	kat9	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Villahermosa D (2017)	28775286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	Figure 3	-	BIOGRID
2605694	2541614	3361527	278111	280603	SPAC29A4.20	SPATRNALYS.02	elp3	SPATRNALYS.02	kat9	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Villahermosa D (2017)	28775286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 4|growth at 16C and 37C|sensitivity to MMS, TBZ, and rapamycin	-	BIOGRID
2605695	2543434	3361527	279854	280603	SPAC8F11.02c	SPATRNALYS.02	dph3	SPATRNALYS.02	-	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Villahermosa D (2017)	28775286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 4|growth at 16C|sensitivity to rapamycin	-	BIOGRID
2605698	2541614	2542789	278111	279238	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC15E1.03	elp3	rpl42	kat9	rpl36a	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Villahermosa D (2017)	28775286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Figure 5|rpl42-P56Q	-	BIOGRID
2605699	2542789	2543434	279238	279854	SPAC15E1.03	SPAC8F11.02c	rpl42	dph3	rpl36a	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Villahermosa D (2017)	28775286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 5|MMS|rpl42-P56Q	-	BIOGRID
2605700	2542789	2541614	279238	278111	SPAC15E1.03	SPAC29A4.20	rpl42	elp3	rpl36a	kat9	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Villahermosa D (2017)	28775286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 5|HU and MMS|rpl42-P56Q	-	BIOGRID
2605701	2541614	2541652	278111	278148	SPAC29A4.20	SPAC24B11.06c	elp3	sty1	kat9	phh1|spc1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Villahermosa D (2017)	28775286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 6	-	BIOGRID
2605702	2541614	2540329	278111	276859	SPAC29A4.20	SPBC29B5.01	elp3	atf1	kat9	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Villahermosa D (2017)	28775286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 6	-	BIOGRID
2605703	2543434	2540329	279854	276859	SPAC8F11.02c	SPBC29B5.01	dph3	atf1	-	gad7|mts1|sss1|SPNCRNA.353|SPNG1409	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Villahermosa D (2017)	28775286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 6|HU and MMS	-	BIOGRID
2605704	2542047	2543434	278528	279854	SPAC21E11.03c	SPAC8F11.02c	pcr1	dph3	mts2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Villahermosa D (2017)	28775286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Figure 6	-	BIOGRID
2605705	2542047	2541614	278528	278111	SPAC21E11.03c	SPAC29A4.20	pcr1	elp3	mts2	kat9	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Villahermosa D (2017)	28775286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation	Figure 6|septated cells	-	BIOGRID
2605706	2542047	2543434	278528	279854	SPAC21E11.03c	SPAC8F11.02c	pcr1	dph3	mts2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Villahermosa D (2017)	28775286	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	septum formation	Figure 6|septated cells	-	BIOGRID
2606365	2542503	2542536	278961	278993	SPAC19A8.12	SPAC18G6.09c	dcp2	SPAC18G6.09c	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Wurm JP (2017)	28533364	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2606366	2542503	2541033	278961	277548	SPAC19A8.12	SPBC3B9.21	dcp2	dcp1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Wurm JP (2017)	28533364	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2606653	2539360	2540051	275926	276589	SPCC613.04c	SPBC32H8.12c	rng3	act1	-	cps8|pi012	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Pollard LW (2017)	28808035	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2606654	2539997	2543545	276541	279962	SPBC1604.14c	SPAC926.03	shk1	rlc1	orb2|pak1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Pollard LW (2017)	28808035	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2606655	2539513	2540051	276075	276589	SPCC645.05c	SPBC32H8.12c	myo2	act1	rng5	cps8|pi012	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Pollard LW (2017)	28808035	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2606656	2542544	2540694	279001	277218	SPAC18G6.10	SPBC19C7.10	lem2	bqt4	heh1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hirano Y (2018)	29292846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2606657	2541585	2540694	278082	277218	SPAC14C4.05c	SPBC19C7.10	man1	bqt4	heh2|mug61	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Hirano Y (2018)	29292846	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2606659	2540097	2540238	276635	276770	SPBC11C11.03	SPBC336.08	ndc80	spc24	ndc10|tid3	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Matsuo Y (2017)	28502666	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2606660	2542004	2540238	278487	276770	SPAC27F1.04c	SPBC336.08	nuf2	spc24	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Matsuo Y (2017)	28502666	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2606661	2540097	2539200	276635	275771	SPBC11C11.03	SPCC188.04c	ndc80	spc25	ndc10|tid3	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Matsuo Y (2017)	28502666	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2606662	2542004	2539200	278487	275771	SPAC27F1.04c	SPCC188.04c	nuf2	spc25	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Matsuo Y (2017)	28502666	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2606663	2540097	2542004	276635	278487	SPBC11C11.03	SPAC27F1.04c	ndc80	nuf2	ndc10|tid3	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Matsuo Y (2017)	28502666	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2606664	2540238	2539200	276770	275771	SPBC336.08	SPCC188.04c	spc24	spc25	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Matsuo Y (2017)	28502666	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2606665	2540097	2539864	276635	276411	SPBC11C11.03	SPBC16A3.15c	ndc80	nda2	ndc10|tid3	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Matsuo Y (2017)	28502666	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2606666	2539505	2539864	276068	276411	SPCC736.14	SPBC16A3.15c	dis1	nda2	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Matsuo Y (2017)	28502666	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2606667	2538913	2541522	275490	278023	SPCC31H12.08c	SPAC23E2.01	ccr4	fep1	SPCC5E4.02c	gaf2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Gallagher PS (2018)	29686279	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2606668	2538913	2540656	275490	277181	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC23E6.09	ccr4	ssn6	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Gallagher PS (2018)	29686279	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2606669	2538913	2540825	275490	277343	SPCC31H12.08c	SPBC428.08c	ccr4	clr4	SPCC5E4.02c	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Gallagher PS (2018)	29686279	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity|vegetative growth	deletion of clr4 is lethal in a ccr4/fep1 double mutant background|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2606670	2541522	2540825	278023	277343	SPAC23E2.01	SPBC428.08c	fep1	clr4	gaf2	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Gallagher PS (2018)	29686279	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cold sensitivity|vegetative growth	deletion of clr4 is lethal in a ccr4/fep1 double mutant background|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2606673	2539371	2538841	275937	275422	SPCC18B5.06	SPCC550.03c	dom34	SPCC550.03c	SPCC18B5.06|erf1|sup45	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Guydosh NR (2017)	28945192	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	-	-	BIOGRID
2606674	2542808	2541957	279256	278444	SPAC15E1.07c	SPAC23C11.16	moa1	plo1	mug159	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Miyazaki S (2017)	28497540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome segregation:partial rescue	The separation of imr1-GFP in prometaphase II in moa1 deletion cells was partly suppressed by expressing Cnp3C-Plo1	-	BIOGRID
2606675	2542808	2540060	279256	276598	SPAC15E1.07c	SPBC106.01	moa1	mph1	mug159	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Miyazaki S (2017)	28497540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation|protein/peptide distribution	-	-	BIOGRID
2606676	2541957	2539155	278444	275727	SPAC23C11.16	SPCC1020.02	plo1	spc7	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Miyazaki S (2017)	28497540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2606677	2538736	2539155	275320	275727	SPCC1322.12c	SPCC1020.02	bub1	spc7	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Miyazaki S (2017)	28497540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2606678	2541856	2539155	278347	275727	SPAC23H3.08c	SPCC1020.02	bub3	spc7	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Miyazaki S (2017)	28497540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2606679	2541957	2538736	278444	275320	SPAC23C11.16	SPCC1322.12c	plo1	bub1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Miyazaki S (2017)	28497540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2606680	2539155	2538736	275727	275320	SPCC1020.02	SPCC1322.12c	spc7	bub1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Miyazaki S (2017)	28497540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2606681	2542808	2539155	279256	275727	SPAC15E1.07c	SPCC1020.02	moa1	spc7	mug159	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Miyazaki S (2017)	28497540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue|protein/peptide distribution:partial rescue	genetic complex|spc7 mutant in a moa1/mph1 background	-	BIOGRID
2606682	2540060	2539155	276598	275727	SPBC106.01	SPCC1020.02	mph1	spc7	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Miyazaki S (2017)	28497540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation:partial rescue|protein/peptide distribution:partial rescue	genetic complex|spc7 mutant in a moa1/mph1 background	-	BIOGRID
2606683	2539155	2541633	275727	278129	SPCC1020.02	SPAC664.01c	spc7	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Miyazaki S (2017)	28497540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	spc7-12A and swi6 deletion showed additive defects in cohesion protection	-	BIOGRID
2606684	2539155	2541326	275727	277838	SPCC1020.02	SPBP35G2.03c	spc7	sgo1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Miyazaki S (2017)	28497540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	spc7-12A showed synthetic defects with sgo1-VE in cohesion protection	-	BIOGRID
2606685	2542808	2541326	279256	277838	SPAC15E1.07c	SPBP35G2.03c	moa1	sgo1	mug159	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Miyazaki S (2017)	28497540	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	moa1 deletion and sgo1-VE show additive defects in cohesion protection	-	BIOGRID
2606686	2540060	2542808	276598	279256	SPBC106.01	SPAC15E1.07c	mph1	moa1	SPBC1271.16c|SPBC243.01	mug159	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Miyazaki S (2017)	29196561	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	-	-	BIOGRID
2606687	2541957	2539155	278444	275727	SPAC23C11.16	SPCC1020.02	plo1	spc7	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Miyazaki S (2017)	29196561	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2606688	2542808	2541326	279256	277838	SPAC15E1.07c	SPBP35G2.03c	moa1	sgo1	mug159	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Miyazaki S (2017)	29196561	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	-	-	BIOGRID
2606689	2539864	2542732	276411	279182	SPBC16A3.15c	SPAC25G10.07c	nda2	cut7	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Britto M (2016)	27834216	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2606690	2540582	2542732	277108	279182	SPBC26H8.07c	SPAC25G10.07c	nda3	cut7	alp12|ben1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Britto M (2016)	27834216	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2606691	2539864	2543360	276411	279782	SPBC16A3.15c	SPAC664.10	nda2	klp2	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Britto M (2016)	27834216	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2606692	2540582	2543360	277108	279782	SPBC26H8.07c	SPAC664.10	nda3	klp2	alp12|ben1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Britto M (2016)	27834216	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2606693	2542744	2542023	279194	278506	SPAC1565.08	SPAC20H4.10	cdc48	ufd2	SPAC6F12.01|dsc6	SPAC145.04	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Xu X (2018)	29352077	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	spontaneous suppressor screening technique	-	BIOGRID
2606694	2539666	2540860	276221	277377	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC428.17c	eso1	wpl1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Xu X (2018)	29352077	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	spontaneous suppressor screening technique	-	BIOGRID
2606695	2539523	2542135	276085	278611	SPCC622.09	SPAC13A11.04c	htb1	ubp8	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Xu X (2018)	29352077	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	spontaneous suppressor screening technique	-	BIOGRID
2606696	2539523	3361397	276085	280473	SPCC622.09	SPAC57A10.14	htb1	sgf11	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Xu X (2018)	29352077	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	spontaneous suppressor screening technique	-	BIOGRID
2606697	2539523	3361305	276085	280381	SPCC622.09	SPBC6B1.12c	htb1	sus1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Xu X (2018)	29352077	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	spontaneous suppressor screening technique	-	BIOGRID
2606698	2539523	2542513	276085	278971	SPCC622.09	SPAC1952.05	htb1	gcn5	-	kat2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Xu X (2018)	29352077	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	spontaneous suppressor screening technique	-	BIOGRID
2606699	2539523	2541202	276085	277716	SPCC622.09	SPBC887.18c	htb1	hfi1	-	ada1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Xu X (2018)	29352077	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	heat sensitivity:wild type|vegetative growth:wild type	spontaneous suppressor screening technique	-	BIOGRID
2607033	2542805	2540051	279253	276589	SPAC15A10.08	SPBC32H8.12c	ain1	act1	-	cps8|pi012	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Morita R (2017)	28338873	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2607034	2539513	2543576	276075	279991	SPCC645.05c	SPAC4A8.05c	myo2	myp2	rng5	myo3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Palani S (2017)	28238661	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	deletion of myp2 inhibits the intragenic lethality suppression of the myo2-E1-Sup1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
2607158	2540825	2542467	277343	278928	SPBC428.08c	SPAC1834.04	clr4	hht1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kusevic D (2017)	28143796	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Methylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2607159	2540825	2540565	277343	277092	SPBC428.08c	SPBC1D7.04	clr4	mlo3	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kusevic D (2017)	28143796	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Methylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2607160	2540825	2541633	277343	278129	SPBC428.08c	SPAC664.01c	clr4	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kusevic D (2017)	28143796	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Methylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2607161	2540825	2543064	277343	279497	SPBC428.08c	SPAC3G6.01	clr4	hrp3	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kusevic D (2017)	28143796	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Methylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2607162	2540825	2540337	277343	276866	SPBC428.08c	SPBC28F2.11	clr4	hmo1	-	SPBC28F2.11	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kusevic D (2017)	28143796	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Methylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2607163	2540825	2542755	277343	279205	SPBC428.08c	SPAC1687.10	clr4	mcp1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kusevic D (2017)	28143796	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Methylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2607164	2540825	2542556	277343	279013	SPBC428.08c	SPAC6G10.07	clr4	cbc1	-	SPAC6G10.07	Biochemical Activity	physical	Kusevic D (2017)	28143796	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Methylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2609071	2541141	2540650	277656	277175	SPBC649.05	SPBC244.01c	cut12	sid4	stf1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chan KY (2017)	28774892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spindle morphology	Figure 1|cut12.1 sid4-SA1|spindle formation	-	BIOGRID
2609072	2542237	2540650	278709	277175	SPAC19E9.02	SPBC244.01c	fin1	sid4	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Chan KY (2017)	28774892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2609073	2540650	2543554	277175	279971	SPBC244.01c	SPAC4H3.11c	sid4	ppc89	-	mug127	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chan KY (2017)	28774892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2609074	2540650	2543554	277175	279971	SPBC244.01c	SPAC4H3.11c	sid4	ppc89	-	mug127	Two-hybrid	physical	Chan KY (2017)	28774892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2609075	2540650	2540718	277175	277241	SPBC244.01c	SPBC3H7.15	sid4	hhp1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chan KY (2017)	28774892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spindle morphology	Figure 5|genetic complex|hhp1 deletion and hhp2.AS mutation together reverses suppression in cut12.1 sid4.T584E double mutant|spindle formation	-	BIOGRID
2609076	2541141	2540718	277656	277241	SPBC649.05	SPBC3H7.15	cut12	hhp1	stf1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chan KY (2017)	28774892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spindle morphology	Figure 5|genetic complex|hhp1 deletion and hhp2.AS mutation together reverses suppression in cut12.1 sid4.T584E double mutant|spindle formation	-	BIOGRID
2609077	2540650	2541929	277175	278417	SPBC244.01c	SPAC23C4.12	sid4	hhp2	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chan KY (2017)	28774892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spindle morphology	Figure 5|genetic complex|hhp1 deletion and hhp2.AS mutation together reverses suppression in cut12.1 sid4.T584E double mutant|spindle formation	-	BIOGRID
2609078	2541141	2541929	277656	278417	SPBC649.05	SPAC23C4.12	cut12	hhp2	stf1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chan KY (2017)	28774892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spindle morphology	Figure 5|genetic complex|hhp1 deletion and hhp2.AS mutation together reverses suppression in cut12.1 sid4.T584E double mutant|spindle formation	-	BIOGRID
2609079	2538959	2540650	275533	277175	SPCC18B5.11c	SPBC244.01c	cds1	sid4	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Chan KY (2017)	28774892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2609080	2538959	2543240	275533	279668	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC694.06c	cds1	mrc1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Chan KY (2017)	28774892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2609081	2540650	2538959	277175	275533	SPBC244.01c	SPCC18B5.11c	sid4	cds1	-	-	PCA	physical	Chan KY (2017)	28774892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	BiFC	-	BIOGRID
2609082	2540650	2538959	277175	275533	SPBC244.01c	SPCC18B5.11c	sid4	cds1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chan KY (2017)	28774892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2609083	2540650	2538959	277175	275533	SPBC244.01c	SPCC18B5.11c	sid4	cds1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chan KY (2017)	28774892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spindle morphology	Figure 7|cds1 deletion reverses suppression in cut12.1 sid4 double mutant|genetic complex|spindle formation	-	BIOGRID
2609084	2541141	2538959	277656	275533	SPBC649.05	SPCC18B5.11c	cut12	cds1	stf1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Chan KY (2017)	28774892	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	spindle morphology	Figure 7|cds1 deletion reverses suppression in cut12.1 sid4 double mutant|genetic complex|spindle formation	-	BIOGRID
2609086	2542204	2538930	278679	275506	SPAC17A5.14	SPCC188.13c	exo2	dcr1	-	SPCC584.10c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Wery M (2018)	29975684	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation	-	-	BIOGRID
2609087	2539123	2541652	275695	278148	SPCC18B5.03	SPAC24B11.06c	wee1	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Paul M (2018)	29065217	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size:partial rescue|viability:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2609088	2542632	2541652	279086	278148	SPAC24H6.05	SPAC24B11.06c	cdc25	sty1	sal2	phh1|spc1	Dosage Growth Defect	genetic	Paul M (2018)	29065217	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2609089	2541652	2542029	278148	278511	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC8E11.02c	sty1	rad24	phh1|spc1	anr5|sam4	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Paul M (2018)	29065217	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2609091	2540578	852652	277104	33039	SPBC26H8.06	YGL220W	grx4	FRA2	-	AIM15	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Dlouhy AC (2017)	28725905	284812	559292	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2609092	2540578	2539644	277104	276199	SPBC26H8.06	SPBC16E9.01c	grx4	php4	-	SPBP16F5.09c	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Dlouhy AC (2017)	28725905	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2609093	2540578	2540578	277104	277104	SPBC26H8.06	SPBC26H8.06	grx4	grx4	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Dlouhy AC (2017)	28725905	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	homodimer	-	BIOGRID
2609138	2540239	2541193	276771	277707	SPBC32H8.10	SPBC776.02c	cdk9	dis2	SPACTOKYO_453.22	bws1|sds1	Biochemical Activity	physical	Parua PK (2018)	29899453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2609139	2540239	2541916	276771	278406	SPBC32H8.10	SPAC23C4.19	cdk9	spt5	SPACTOKYO_453.22	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Parua PK (2018)	29899453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2609140	2540239	2540239	276771	276771	SPBC32H8.10	SPBC32H8.10	cdk9	cdk9	SPACTOKYO_453.22	SPACTOKYO_453.22	Biochemical Activity	physical	Parua PK (2018)	29899453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2609141	2540239	2540237	276771	276769	SPBC32H8.10	SPBC32F12.06	cdk9	pch1	SPACTOKYO_453.22	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Parua PK (2018)	29899453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2609142	2541193	2541916	277707	278406	SPBC776.02c	SPAC23C4.19	dis2	spt5	bws1|sds1	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Parua PK (2018)	29899453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Dephosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2609143	2540239	2541193	276771	277707	SPBC32H8.10	SPBC776.02c	cdk9	dis2	SPACTOKYO_453.22	bws1|sds1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Parua PK (2018)	29899453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	-	-	BIOGRID
2609200	2543222	2539219	279650	275789	SPAC821.08c	SPCC1795.01c	slp1	mad3	cdc20	SPCC895.02	Co-fractionation	physical	May KM (2017)	28366744	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2609201	2543222	2540589	279650	277115	SPAC821.08c	SPBC20F10.06	slp1	mad2	cdc20	-	Co-fractionation	physical	May KM (2017)	28366744	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2609202	2542615	2539219	279069	275789	SPAC19G12.01c	SPCC1795.01c	cut20	mad3	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	SPCC895.02	Co-fractionation	physical	May KM (2017)	28366744	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2609203	2542615	2540589	279069	277115	SPAC19G12.01c	SPBC20F10.06	cut20	mad2	SPAPJ698.04c|apc4|lid1	-	Co-fractionation	physical	May KM (2017)	28366744	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2609205	2539639	2539219	276194	275789	SPBC106.09	SPCC1795.01c	cut4	mad3	apc1	SPCC895.02	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	May KM (2017)	28366744	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2609206	2539639	2540589	276194	277115	SPBC106.09	SPBC20F10.06	cut4	mad2	apc1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	May KM (2017)	28366744	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2609207	2539639	2543222	276194	279650	SPBC106.09	SPAC821.08c	cut4	slp1	apc1	cdc20	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	May KM (2017)	28366744	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2609208	2539639	2540655	276194	277180	SPBC106.09	SPBC83.04	cut4	apc15	apc1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	May KM (2017)	28366744	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2609209	2543222	2539219	279650	275789	SPAC821.08c	SPCC1795.01c	slp1	mad3	cdc20	SPCC895.02	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	May KM (2017)	28366744	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2609210	2543222	2540589	279650	277115	SPAC821.08c	SPBC20F10.06	slp1	mad2	cdc20	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	May KM (2017)	28366744	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2609211	2543222	2543222	279650	279650	SPAC821.08c	SPAC821.08c	slp1	slp1	cdc20	cdc20	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	May KM (2017)	28366744	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2609212	2543222	2540655	279650	277180	SPAC821.08c	SPBC83.04	slp1	apc15	cdc20	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	May KM (2017)	28366744	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2609213	2541592	2539219	278089	275789	SPAC6F12.15c	SPCC1795.01c	cut9	mad3	dre1	SPCC895.02	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	May KM (2017)	28366744	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2609214	2541592	2540589	278089	277115	SPAC6F12.15c	SPBC20F10.06	cut9	mad2	dre1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	May KM (2017)	28366744	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2609215	2541592	2543222	278089	279650	SPAC6F12.15c	SPAC821.08c	cut9	slp1	dre1	cdc20	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	May KM (2017)	28366744	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2609216	2541592	2540655	278089	277180	SPAC6F12.15c	SPBC83.04	cut9	apc15	dre1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	May KM (2017)	28366744	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2609727	2542732	2542655	279182	279109	SPAC25G10.07c	SPAC3A11.14c	cut7	pkl1	-	SPAC3H5.03c|klp1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Takeda A (2019)	31474649	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2609728	2542732	2539908	279182	276454	SPAC25G10.07c	SPBC13E7.06	cut7	msd1	-	mug172	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Takeda A (2019)	31474649	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2609729	2539881	2541620	276427	278117	SPBC16G5.12c	SPAC2G11.12	top3	rqh1	-	hus2|rad12|rec9	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Takeda A (2019)	31474649	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2609730	2540205	2541526	276738	278026	SPBC1271.13	SPAC14C4.14	mrpl8	atp1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Takeda A (2019)	31474649	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2609731	2540205	2539539	276738	276101	SPBC1271.13	SPCC576.10c	mrpl8	rpt3	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Takeda A (2019)	31474649	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2609732	2540205	2542770	276738	279220	SPBC1271.13	SPAC167.07c	mrpl8	hul5	-	SPAC167.07c|SPAC57A7.03c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Takeda A (2019)	31474649	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	viability	-	-	BIOGRID
2609779	2540580	2541867	277106	278357	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC22E12.14c	ran1	sck2	pat1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Weston L (2017)	28476936	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size|meiosis	Overexpression of genes that can reverse meiotic arrest of pat1-114 mei4 double mutant|Table 1|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2609780	2540241	2541867	276773	278357	SPBC32H8.11	SPAC22E12.14c	mei4	sck2	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Weston L (2017)	28476936	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size|meiosis	Overexpression of genes that can reverse meiotic arrest of pat1-114 mei4 double mutant|Table 1|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2609781	2540580	2538704	277106	275288	SPBC19C2.05	SPCC320.07c	ran1	mde7	pat1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Weston L (2017)	28476936	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size|meiosis	Overexpression of genes that can reverse meiotic arrest of pat1-114 mei4 double mutant|Table 1|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2609782	2540241	2538704	276773	275288	SPBC32H8.11	SPCC320.07c	mei4	mde7	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Weston L (2017)	28476936	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size|meiosis	Overexpression of genes that can reverse meiotic arrest of pat1-114 mei4 double mutant|Table 1|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2609783	2540580	2543112	277106	279544	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC3A12.07	ran1	rpb11	pat1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Weston L (2017)	28476936	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size|meiosis	Overexpression of genes that can reverse meiotic arrest of pat1-114 mei4 double mutant|Table 1|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2609784	2540241	2543112	276773	279544	SPBC32H8.11	SPAC3A12.07	mei4	rpb11	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Weston L (2017)	28476936	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size|meiosis	Overexpression of genes that can reverse meiotic arrest of pat1-114 mei4 double mutant|Table 1|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2609785	2540580	2543225	277106	279653	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC56F8.07	ran1	SPAC56F8.07	pat1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Weston L (2017)	28476936	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size|meiosis	Overexpression of genes that can reverse meiotic arrest of pat1-114 mei4 double mutant|Table 1|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2609786	2540241	2543225	276773	279653	SPBC32H8.11	SPAC56F8.07	mei4	SPAC56F8.07	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Weston L (2017)	28476936	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size|meiosis	Overexpression of genes that can reverse meiotic arrest of pat1-114 mei4 double mutant|Table 1|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2609787	2540580	2538866	277106	275446	SPBC19C2.05	SPCC1620.12c	ran1	SPCC1620.12c	pat1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Weston L (2017)	28476936	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size|meiosis	Overexpression of genes that can reverse meiotic arrest of pat1-114 mei4 double mutant|Table 1|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2609788	2540241	2538866	276773	275446	SPBC32H8.11	SPCC1620.12c	mei4	SPCC1620.12c	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Weston L (2017)	28476936	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size|meiosis	Overexpression of genes that can reverse meiotic arrest of pat1-114 mei4 double mutant|Table 1|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2609789	2540580	2543649	277106	280063	SPBC19C2.05	SPAC3H5.11	ran1	SPAC3H5.11	pat1	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Weston L (2017)	28476936	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size|meiosis	Overexpression of genes that can reverse meiotic arrest of pat1-114 mei4 double mutant|Table 1|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2609790	2540241	2543649	276773	280063	SPBC32H8.11	SPAC3H5.11	mei4	SPAC3H5.11	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Weston L (2017)	28476936	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size|meiosis	Overexpression of genes that can reverse meiotic arrest of pat1-114 mei4 double mutant|Table 1|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2609791	2540580	2539798	277106	276348	SPBC19C2.05	SPBC146.14c	ran1	sec26	pat1	SPBC337.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Weston L (2017)	28476936	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size|meiosis	Overexpression of genes that can reverse meiotic arrest of pat1-114 mei4 double mutant|Table 1|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2609792	2540241	2539798	276773	276348	SPBC32H8.11	SPBC146.14c	mei4	sec26	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	SPBC337.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Weston L (2017)	28476936	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size|meiosis	Overexpression of genes that can reverse meiotic arrest of pat1-114 mei4 double mutant|Table 1|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2609793	2540580	2539083	277106	275655	SPBC19C2.05	SPCC1020.04c	ran1	rpb6	pat1	rpo15	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Weston L (2017)	28476936	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size|meiosis	Overexpression of genes that can reverse meiotic arrest of pat1-114 mei4 double mutant|Table 1|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2609794	2540241	2539083	276773	275655	SPBC32H8.11	SPCC1020.04c	mei4	rpb6	dot4|pi013|SPACTOKYO_453.23	rpo15	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Weston L (2017)	28476936	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell size|meiosis	Overexpression of genes that can reverse meiotic arrest of pat1-114 mei4 double mutant|Table 1|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2609799	2538951	2539109	275525	275681	SPCC297.03	SPCC74.03c	ssp1	ssp2	-	ucp9	Biochemical Activity	physical	Deng L (2017)	28223368	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2609800	2539109	5802929	275681	858067	SPCC74.03c	SPAC1556.08c	ssp2	cbs2	ucp9	SPAC1F12.01c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Deng L (2017)	28223368	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2609801	2539511	2541117	276073	277632	SPCC663.01c	SPBC646.13	ekc1	sds23	SPCC777.16c|eck1	moc1|psp1	PCA	physical	Deng L (2017)	28223368	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	BiFC	-	BIOGRID
2609802	2541117	2541590	277632	278087	SPBC646.13	SPAC57A10.02	sds23	cdr2	moc1|psp1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Deng L (2017)	28223368	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	Figure 6|sds23 cdr2-T166A	-	BIOGRID
2609803	2542374	2540719	278838	277242	SPAC17H9.19c	SPBC216.05	cdt2	rad3	sev1	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Fleck O (2017)	28441348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
2609804	2540020	2542696	276564	279149	SPBC16D10.09	SPAC29B12.03	pcn1	spd1	pcn	-	PCA	physical	Fleck O (2017)	28441348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	BiFC|Figure 1	-	BIOGRID
2609805	2540719	2542696	277242	279149	SPBC216.05	SPAC29B12.03	rad3	spd1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fleck O (2017)	28441348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Figure 3|Figure 5|in cdt2TR background	-	BIOGRID
2609806	2540719	2540381	277242	276910	SPBC216.05	SPBC25D12.04	rad3	suc22	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fleck O (2017)	28441348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Figure 3	-	BIOGRID
2609807	2543289	2542696	279714	279149	SPAC9E9.08	SPAC29B12.03	rad26	spd1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fleck O (2017)	28441348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Figure 3|in cdt2TR background	-	BIOGRID
2609808	2542558	2542696	279014	279149	SPAC1952.07	SPAC29B12.03	rad1	spd1	rad19	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fleck O (2017)	28441348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Figure 3|in cdt2TR background	-	BIOGRID
2609809	2543544	2542696	279961	279149	SPAC664.07c	SPAC29B12.03	rad9	spd1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fleck O (2017)	28441348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Figure 3|in cdt2TR background	-	BIOGRID
2609810	2541643	2542696	278139	279149	SPAC14C4.13	SPAC29B12.03	rad17	spd1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fleck O (2017)	28441348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Figure 3|in cdt2TR background	-	BIOGRID
2609811	2538959	2542696	275533	279149	SPCC18B5.11c	SPAC29B12.03	cds1	spd1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fleck O (2017)	28441348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Figure 3|genetic complex|in cdt2TR background	-	BIOGRID
2609812	2539087	2542696	275659	279149	SPCC1259.13	SPAC29B12.03	chk1	spd1	rad27	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Fleck O (2017)	28441348	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Figure 3|genetic complex|in cdt2TR background	-	BIOGRID
2610135	2539834	2539666	276383	276221	SPBC14C8.14c	SPBC16A3.11	pol5	eso1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Chen Z (2017)	29039458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2610136	2539666	2539834	276221	276383	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC14C8.14c	eso1	pol5	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Chen Z (2017)	29039458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2610137	2539666	2539834	276221	276383	SPBC16A3.11	SPBC14C8.14c	eso1	pol5	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Chen Z (2017)	29039458	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Acetylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2610138	2542982	2541058	279420	277573	SPAC10F6.12c	SPBC3H7.09	mam4	erf2	-	mug142	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Franco A (2017)	28729673	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	mating efficiency	Figure 4|conjugation efficiency	-	BIOGRID
2610139	2540541	2539666	277068	276221	SPBC1A4.03c	SPBC16A3.11	top2	eso1	ptr11	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Lin SJ (2017)	28382430	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	top2-191 eso1-H17	-	BIOGRID
2610140	2540541	2541628	277068	278124	SPBC1A4.03c	SPAC110.02	top2	pds5	ptr11	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Lin SJ (2017)	28382430	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	top2-191	-	BIOGRID
2610141	2540541	2540860	277068	277377	SPBC1A4.03c	SPBC428.17c	top2	wpl1	ptr11	-	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Lin SJ (2017)	28382430	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	top2-191	-	BIOGRID
2610142	2540541	2539020	277068	275593	SPBC1A4.03c	SPCC5E4.06	top2	smc6	ptr11	rad18	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Lin SJ (2017)	28382430	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	top2-191 smc6-74	-	BIOGRID
2610143	2540541	2543010	277068	279448	SPBC1A4.03c	SPAC10F6.09c	top2	psm3	ptr11	smc3	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Lin SJ (2017)	28382430	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	top2-191 psm3-RR/NN	-	BIOGRID
2610144	2539517	2542293	276079	278761	SPCC576.15c	SPAC17G8.14c	ksg1	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Biochemical Activity	physical	Madrid M (2017)	28536259	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Phosphorylation	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2610145	2542293	2539649	278761	276204	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC12D12.04c	pck1	pck2	SPAC22H10.01c	pkc1|sts6	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Madrid M (2017)	28536259	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	Figure 5|Pmk1 phosphorylation|pck1-A399E	-	BIOGRID
2610146	2542293	2539649	278761	276204	SPAC17G8.14c	SPBC12D12.04c	pck1	pck2	SPAC22H10.01c	pkc1|sts6	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Madrid M (2017)	28536259	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	metal resistance	Figure 5|growth on MgCl2|pck1-A399E	-	BIOGRID
2610147	2541612	2542293	278109	278761	SPAC1F7.04	SPAC17G8.14c	rho1	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Madrid M (2017)	28536259	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 6|growth on caspofungin|rho1-596 pck1-A399E	-	BIOGRID
2610148	2541612	2542293	278109	278761	SPAC1F7.04	SPAC17G8.14c	rho1	pck1	-	SPAC22H10.01c	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Madrid M (2017)	28536259	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	Figure 6|rho1-596 pck1-A399E	-	BIOGRID
2610149	2542293	2541612	278761	278109	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC1F7.04	pck1	rho1	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Madrid M (2017)	28536259	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	Figure 6|genetic complex|rho1-596 rho2 pck1-A399E	-	BIOGRID
2610150	2542293	2542773	278761	279222	SPAC17G8.14c	SPAC16.01	pck1	rho2	SPAC22H10.01c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Madrid M (2017)	28536259	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	Figure 6|genetic complex|rho1-596 rho2 pck1-A399E	-	BIOGRID
2610521	2540825	100049126	277343	674575	SPBC428.08c	-	clr4	hist2h3c	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Akoury E (2019)	31165882	284812	8355	Low Throughput	-	-	-	nucleosome binding	-	BIOGRID
2610522	2540825	100049126	277343	674575	SPBC428.08c	-	clr4	hist2h3c	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Akoury E (2019)	31165882	284812	8355	Low Throughput	-	Methylation	-	K9	-	BIOGRID
2610523	852549	2540218	32942	276751	YBR247C	SPBC32H8.04c	ENP1	SPBC32H8.04c	MEG1|L000003200|L000001059	pi019|SPACTOKYO_453.16	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	An W (2018)	29641590	559292	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2610527	2538706	2538706	275290	275290	SPCC338.08	SPCC338.08	ctp1	ctp1	mug38|nip1|slr9	mug38|nip1|slr9	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Andres SN (2019)	30626735	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	oligomers on DNA	-	BIOGRID
2610528	2539481	2542513	276044	278971	SPCC622.16c	SPAC1952.05	epe1	gcn5	kdm2	kat2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bao K (2019)	30573453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	Figure 2|gcn5 deletion suppresses silencing defects caused by Epe1 overexpression	-	BIOGRID
2610529	2539481	2541633	276044	278129	SPCC622.16c	SPAC664.01c	epe1	swi6	kdm2	SPAC824.10c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bao K (2019)	30573453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
2610530	2539481	2539174	276044	275745	SPCC622.16c	SPCC24B10.08c	epe1	ada2	kdm2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bao K (2019)	30573453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	Figure 3|deletion of ada2 suppresses silencing defects caused by Epe1 overexpression	-	BIOGRID
2610531	2539481	2540436	276044	276964	SPCC622.16c	SPBC28F2.10c	epe1	ngg1	kdm2	ada3|kap1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bao K (2019)	30573453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	Figure 3|deletion of ada3 suppresses silencing defects caused by Epe1 overexpression	-	BIOGRID
2610532	2539481	2542513	276044	278971	SPCC622.16c	SPAC1952.05	epe1	gcn5	kdm2	kat2	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bao K (2019)	30573453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2610533	2539481	2540436	276044	276964	SPCC622.16c	SPBC28F2.10c	epe1	ngg1	kdm2	ada3|kap1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bao K (2019)	30573453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2610534	2539481	2540787	276044	277306	SPCC622.16c	SPBC1921.07c	epe1	sgf29	kdm2	SPBC21D10.13	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bao K (2019)	30573453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2610535	2539481	2542135	276044	278611	SPCC622.16c	SPAC13A11.04c	epe1	ubp8	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bao K (2019)	30573453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2610536	2539481	2541202	276044	277716	SPCC622.16c	SPBC887.18c	epe1	hfi1	kdm2	ada1	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bao K (2019)	30573453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2610537	2539481	2539775	276044	276326	SPCC622.16c	SPBC14C8.17c	epe1	spt8	kdm2	sep9	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bao K (2019)	30573453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2610538	2539481	2540408	276044	276936	SPCC622.16c	SPBC25H2.11c	epe1	spt7	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bao K (2019)	30573453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2610539	2539481	2543675	276044	280089	SPCC622.16c	SPAC4D7.10c	epe1	spt20	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bao K (2019)	30573453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2610540	2539481	2541265	276044	277779	SPCC622.16c	SPBP16F5.03c	epe1	tra1	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bao K (2019)	30573453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2610541	2539481	2539353	276044	275919	SPCC622.16c	SPCC5E4.03c	epe1	taf5	kdm2	taf72	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bao K (2019)	30573453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2610542	2539481	2539133	276044	275705	SPCC622.16c	SPCC16C4.18c	epe1	taf6	kdm2	taf50	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bao K (2019)	30573453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2610543	2539481	2540614	276044	277140	SPCC622.16c	SPBC21H7.02	epe1	taf10	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bao K (2019)	30573453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2610544	2539481	2542785	276044	279234	SPCC622.16c	SPAC15A10.02	epe1	taf12	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-MS	physical	Bao K (2019)	30573453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2610545	2539481	2542513	276044	278971	SPCC622.16c	SPAC1952.05	epe1	gcn5	kdm2	kat2	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bao K (2019)	30573453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2610546	2539481	2541265	276044	277779	SPCC622.16c	SPBP16F5.03c	epe1	tra1	kdm2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bao K (2019)	30573453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	Figure 4|deletion of tra1 suppresses silencing defects caused by Epe1 overexpression	-	BIOGRID
2610547	2539481	2540408	276044	276936	SPCC622.16c	SPBC25H2.11c	epe1	spt7	kdm2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Bao K (2019)	30573453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2610549	3361342	2539481	280418	276044	SPBC16D10.07c	SPCC622.16c	sir2	epe1	-	kdm2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bao K (2019)	30573453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	Figure 6|deletion of epe1 suppresses silencing defects in sir2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
2610550	3361342	2542513	280418	278971	SPBC16D10.07c	SPAC1952.05	sir2	gcn5	-	kat2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Bao K (2019)	30573453	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	Figure 6|deletion of gcn5 suppresses silencing defects in sir2 mutant	-	BIOGRID
2610558	6996	2541746	112855	278240	-	SPAC20G4.04c	TDG	hus1	hTDG	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Guan X (2007)	17855402	9606	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2610559	6996	2542558	112855	279014	-	SPAC1952.07	TDG	rad1	hTDG	rad19	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Guan X (2007)	17855402	9606	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2610560	6996	2543544	112855	279961	-	SPAC664.07c	TDG	rad9	hTDG	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Guan X (2007)	17855402	9606	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2610678	5802965	2543233	858103	279661	SPAC11H11.06	SPAC630.03	arp2	arp3	SPAC22F8.01	act2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Balzer CJ (2018)	30471998	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2610679	2540504	2543233	277032	279661	SPBC24C6.10c	SPAC630.03	dip1	arp3	-	act2	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Balzer CJ (2018)	30471998	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2610680	2540504	5802965	277032	858103	SPBC24C6.10c	SPAC11H11.06	dip1	arp2	-	SPAC22F8.01	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Balzer CJ (2018)	30471998	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2610682	2539104	2541257	275676	277771	SPCC1223.10c	SPBP23A10.14c	eaf1	ell1	-	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Dabas P (2018)	29032152	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2610684	2542534	2543245	278992	279673	SPAC6G10.09	SPAC56F8.06c	SPAC6G10.09	alg10	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Gallo GL (2018)	30389790	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	Figure 5	-	BIOGRID
2610693	2540455	2538846	276983	275427	SPBC215.05	SPCC1919.10c	gpd1	myo52	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Haupt A (2018)	30318352	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	Figure 3	-	BIOGRID
2610694	2540455	2539487	276983	276050	SPBC215.05	SPCC895.05	gpd1	for3	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Haupt A (2018)	30318352	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	Figure 3	-	BIOGRID
2610695	2540455	2543529	276983	279947	SPBC215.05	SPAC4C5.02c	gpd1	ryh1	-	hos1|sat7	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Haupt A (2018)	30318352	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	Figure 3	-	BIOGRID
2610696	2540455	2541652	276983	278148	SPBC215.05	SPAC24B11.06c	gpd1	sty1	-	phh1|spc1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Haupt A (2018)	30318352	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	Figure 3	-	BIOGRID
2610697	2540455	2539047	276983	275620	SPBC215.05	SPCC1223.06	gpd1	tea1	-	alp8	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Haupt A (2018)	30318352	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	Figure 3	-	BIOGRID
2610698	2540455	2540593	276983	277119	SPBC215.05	SPBC28E12.03	gpd1	rga4	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Haupt A (2018)	30318352	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	Figure 3	-	BIOGRID
2610699	2539481	2540825	276044	277343	SPCC622.16c	SPBC428.08c	epe1	clr4	kdm2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Zofall M (2016)	27264871	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	-	-	BIOGRID
2610700	2539481	2542313	276044	278779	SPCC622.16c	SPAC16A10.07c	epe1	taz1	kdm2	myb|myb1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Zofall M (2016)	27264871	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	-	-	BIOGRID
2610701	2540825	2539352	277343	275918	SPBC428.08c	SPCC188.07	clr4	ccq1	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Zofall M (2016)	27264871	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2611565	2539658	2540292	276213	276823	SPBC1105.17	SPBC28F2.12	cnp1	rpb1	sim2	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Shukla M (2018)	30503616	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2612068	2539497	100158003	276060	1158411	SPCC895.07	-	alp14	LOC100158003	mtc1	TUBA1A	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Nithianantham S (2018)	30422110	284812	9823	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Alp14 with alpha and beta tubulin	-	BIOGRID
2612069	2539497	100134983	276060	1151922	SPCC895.07	CH242-247L10.4	alp14	TUBB1	mtc1	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Nithianantham S (2018)	30422110	284812	9823	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Alp14 with alpha and beta tubulin	-	BIOGRID
2612072	2539497	100158003	276060	1158411	SPCC895.07	-	alp14	LOC100158003	mtc1	TUBA1A	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Nithianantham S (2018)	30422110	284812	9823	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Alp14 with alpha and beta tubulin	-	BIOGRID
2612073	2539497	100134983	276060	1151922	SPCC895.07	CH242-247L10.4	alp14	TUBB1	mtc1	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Nithianantham S (2018)	30422110	284812	9823	Low Throughput	-	-	-	Alp14 with alpha and beta tubulin	-	BIOGRID
2614311	2543281	2542517	279708	278975	SPAC23C4.18c	SPACUNK4.14	rad4	mdb1	cut5|dpb11|dre3	-	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Day M (2018)	30295604	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2614312	2543281	2542628	279708	279082	SPAC23C4.18c	SPAC24H6.06	rad4	sld3	cut5|dpb11|dre3	mug175	Co-crystal Structure	physical	Day M (2018)	30295604	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2614317	2543281	2542517	279708	278975	SPAC23C4.18c	SPACUNK4.14	rad4	mdb1	cut5|dpb11|dre3	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Day M (2018)	30295604	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2614318	2543281	2542628	279708	279082	SPAC23C4.18c	SPAC24H6.06	rad4	sld3	cut5|dpb11|dre3	mug175	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Day M (2018)	30295604	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2614323	2542517	3361306	278975	280382	SPACUNK4.14	SPBC6B1.09c	mdb1	nbs1	-	slr10	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Day M (2018)	30295604	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2614578	2539659	2542019	276214	278502	SPBC146.13c	SPAC23A1.17	myo1	SPAC23A1.17	-	-	Co-localization	physical	MacQuarrie CD (2019)	31391237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2614579	2539659	2540100	276214	276638	SPBC146.13c	SPBC13E7.09	myo1	vrp1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	MacQuarrie CD (2019)	31391237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2614580	2539659	2543589	276214	280004	SPBC146.13c	SPAC4F10.15c	myo1	wsp1	-	-	Co-localization	physical	MacQuarrie CD (2019)	31391237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2614581	2539659	2541975	276214	278460	SPBC146.13c	SPAC20G8.05c	myo1	cdc15	-	-	Co-localization	physical	MacQuarrie CD (2019)	31391237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2614582	2541530	2542019	278030	278502	SPAC57A10.10c	SPAC23A1.17	sla1	SPAC23A1.17	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	MacQuarrie CD (2019)	31391237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution	-	-	BIOGRID
2614583	2541530	2540100	278030	276638	SPAC57A10.10c	SPBC13E7.09	sla1	vrp1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	MacQuarrie CD (2019)	31391237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2614584	2542019	2540100	278502	276638	SPAC23A1.17	SPBC13E7.09	SPAC23A1.17	vrp1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	MacQuarrie CD (2019)	31391237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2614585	2541530	2539659	278030	276214	SPAC57A10.10c	SPBC146.13c	sla1	myo1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	MacQuarrie CD (2019)	31391237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2614586	2542019	2539659	278502	276214	SPAC23A1.17	SPBC146.13c	SPAC23A1.17	myo1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	MacQuarrie CD (2019)	31391237	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution:wild type	-	-	BIOGRID
2614587	2540821	2541531	277339	278031	SPBC800.03	SPAC25A8.01c	clr3	fft3	-	snf2SR	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Taneja N (2017)	28318821	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide accumulation	-	-	BIOGRID
2614588	2541531	2538959	278031	275533	SPAC25A8.01c	SPCC18B5.11c	fft3	cds1	snf2SR	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Taneja N (2017)	28318821	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2614589	2541531	2540719	278031	277242	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC216.05	fft3	rad3	snf2SR	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Taneja N (2017)	28318821	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2614590	2541531	2540825	278031	277343	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC428.08c	fft3	clr4	snf2SR	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Taneja N (2017)	28318821	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2614591	2541531	2540825	278031	277343	SPAC25A8.01c	SPBC428.08c	fft3	clr4	snf2SR	-	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Taneja N (2017)	28318821	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing:partial rescue|vegetative growth:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2614598	2542084	2541028	278561	277543	SPAC7D4.07c	SPBC577.08c	trx1	txl1	-	trx3	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Domenech A (2018)	29859088	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein activity	-	-	BIOGRID
2614599	2542084	2539418	278561	275983	SPAC7D4.07c	SPCC757.07c	trx1	ctt1	-	cta1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Domenech A (2018)	29859088	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein activity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2614600	2541028	2539418	277543	275983	SPBC577.08c	SPCC757.07c	txl1	ctt1	trx3	cta1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Domenech A (2018)	29859088	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein activity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2614601	2539572	2539418	276132	275983	SPCC576.03c	SPCC757.07c	tpx1	ctt1	-	cta1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Domenech A (2018)	29859088	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein activity:partial rescue	-	-	BIOGRID
2614602	2540115	2542414	276652	278878	SPBC1778.02	SPAC6F6.16c	rap1	tpz1	-	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ogawa S (2018)	29997179	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:wild type	early replication of AT2088 and ori2100 was suppressed by expression of the Tpz1-Taz1 fusion protein in rap1/poz1 double mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
2614603	2542244	2542313	278714	278779	SPAC19G12.13c	SPAC16A10.07c	poz1	taz1	-	myb|myb1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ogawa S (2018)	29997179	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:wild type	early replication of AT2088 and ori2100 was suppressed by expression of the Tpz1-Taz1 fusion protein in rap1/poz1 double mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
2614604	2542244	2542414	278714	278878	SPAC19G12.13c	SPAC6F6.16c	poz1	tpz1	-	SPAC6F6.18c|mug169	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ogawa S (2018)	29997179	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:wild type	early replication of AT2088 and ori2100 was suppressed by expression of the Tpz1-Taz1 fusion protein in rap1/poz1 double mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
2614605	2540115	2542313	276652	278779	SPBC1778.02	SPAC16A10.07c	rap1	taz1	-	myb|myb1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ogawa S (2018)	29997179	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance:wild type	early replication of AT2088 and ori2100 was suppressed by expression of the Tpz1-Taz1 fusion protein in rap1/poz1 double mutant cells	-	BIOGRID
2614932	2539244	2541856	275814	278347	SPCC1672.06c	SPAC23H3.08c	asp1	bub3	vip1	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Pascual-Ortiz M (2018)	29440310	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chromosome/plasmid maintenance	-	-	BIOGRID
2614933	2539244	2538821	275814	275402	SPCC1672.06c	SPCC584.01c	asp1	SPCC584.01c	vip1	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Pascual-Ortiz M (2018)	29440310	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2614934	2538821	2539244	275402	275814	SPCC584.01c	SPCC1672.06c	SPCC584.01c	asp1	-	vip1	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Pascual-Ortiz M (2018)	29440310	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2614935	2540560	2543546	277087	279963	SPBC2D10.14c	SPAC4H3.14c	myo51	rng8	-	SPAC4H3.14c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Dudin O (2017)	28410370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell fusion	-	-	BIOGRID
2614936	2538846	2543546	275427	279963	SPCC1919.10c	SPAC4H3.14c	myo52	rng8	-	SPAC4H3.14c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Dudin O (2017)	28410370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell fusion	-	-	BIOGRID
2614937	2540560	2541940	277087	278427	SPBC2D10.14c	SPAC27F1.02c	myo51	cdc8	-	fus4	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Dudin O (2017)	28410370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell fusion	-	-	BIOGRID
2614938	2543546	2541940	279963	278427	SPAC4H3.14c	SPAC27F1.02c	rng8	cdc8	SPAC4H3.14c	fus4	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Dudin O (2017)	28410370	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell fusion	-	-	BIOGRID
2615901	2541891	2541821	278381	278312	SPAC1F8.03c	SPAC1F8.02c	str3	shu1	-	SPAC1F8.02c	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Normant V (2018)	29549126	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 3|growth in hemin|hem1 deletion background	-	BIOGRID
2615902	2541891	2541821	278381	278312	SPAC1F8.03c	SPAC1F8.02c	str3	shu1	-	SPAC1F8.02c	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Normant V (2018)	29549126	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	chemical compound accumulation	Figure 3|ZnMP cellular assimilation|hem1 deletion background	-	BIOGRID
2616901	2541869	2541531	278359	278031	SPAC22F3.13	SPAC25A8.01c	tsc1	fft3	-	snf2SR	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Rayhan A (2018)	29343513	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2616902	2541869	2543619	278359	280033	SPAC22F3.13	SPAC4F10.04	tsc1	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Rayhan A (2018)	29343513	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2616903	2543339	2541531	279762	278031	SPAC630.13c	SPAC25A8.01c	tsc2	fft3	-	snf2SR	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Rayhan A (2018)	29343513	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2616904	2543339	2543619	279762	280033	SPAC630.13c	SPAC4F10.04	tsc2	ypa1	-	SPAC4F10.04|rrd1	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Rayhan A (2018)	29343513	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	vegetative growth	-	-	BIOGRID
2617061	2538881	2542513	275460	278971	SPCC1620.14c	SPAC1952.05	snf22	gcn5	SPCC830.01c	kat2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Adachi A (2018)	28674280	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation|chromosome/plasmid maintenance	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
2617062	2538881	2543064	275460	279497	SPCC1620.14c	SPAC3G6.01	snf22	hrp3	SPCC830.01c	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Adachi A (2018)	28674280	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation|chromosome/plasmid maintenance	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
2617063	2543064	2542513	279497	278971	SPAC3G6.01	SPAC1952.05	hrp3	gcn5	-	kat2	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Adachi A (2018)	28674280	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	RNA accumulation|chromosome/plasmid maintenance	Figure 2	-	BIOGRID
2617108	2542239	2542467	278711	278928	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC1834.04	chp1	hht1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ren B (2018)	29136238	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	H3Y41F	-	BIOGRID
2617109	2542239	2541220	278711	277734	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC8D2.04	chp1	hht2	-	h3.2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ren B (2018)	29136238	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	H3Y41F	-	BIOGRID
2617110	2542239	2539804	278711	276354	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC1105.11c	chp1	hht3	-	h3.3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ren B (2018)	29136238	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	H3Y41F	-	BIOGRID
2617111	2540825	2542467	277343	278928	SPBC428.08c	SPAC1834.04	clr4	hht1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ren B (2018)	29136238	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	H3Y41F	-	BIOGRID
2617112	2540825	2541220	277343	277734	SPBC428.08c	SPBC8D2.04	clr4	hht2	-	h3.2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ren B (2018)	29136238	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	H3Y41F	-	BIOGRID
2617113	2540825	2539804	277343	276354	SPBC428.08c	SPBC1105.11c	clr4	hht3	-	h3.3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ren B (2018)	29136238	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	H3Y41F	-	BIOGRID
2617114	2539403	2542467	275968	278928	SPCC736.11	SPAC1834.04	ago1	hht1	csp9	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ren B (2018)	29136238	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	H3Y41F	-	BIOGRID
2617115	2539403	2541220	275968	277734	SPCC736.11	SPBC8D2.04	ago1	hht2	csp9	h3.2	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ren B (2018)	29136238	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	H3Y41F	-	BIOGRID
2617116	2539403	2539804	275968	276354	SPCC736.11	SPBC1105.11c	ago1	hht3	csp9	h3.3	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Ren B (2018)	29136238	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	H3Y41F	-	BIOGRID
2617117	2542467	2541633	278928	278129	SPAC1834.04	SPAC664.01c	hht1	swi6	-	SPAC824.10c	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ren B (2018)	29136238	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2617118	2541220	2541633	277734	278129	SPBC8D2.04	SPAC664.01c	hht2	swi6	h3.2	SPAC824.10c	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ren B (2018)	29136238	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2617119	2539804	2541633	276354	278129	SPBC1105.11c	SPAC664.01c	hht3	swi6	h3.3	SPAC824.10c	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ren B (2018)	29136238	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2617120	2542467	2542239	278928	278711	SPAC1834.04	SPAC18G6.02c	hht1	chp1	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ren B (2018)	29136238	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2617121	2541220	2542239	277734	278711	SPBC8D2.04	SPAC18G6.02c	hht2	chp1	h3.2	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ren B (2018)	29136238	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2617122	2539804	2542239	276354	278711	SPBC1105.11c	SPAC18G6.02c	hht3	chp1	h3.3	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Ren B (2018)	29136238	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2617123	2542239	2542467	278711	278928	SPAC18G6.02c	SPAC1834.04	chp1	hht1	-	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ren B (2018)	29136238	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	H3Y41F|HU	-	BIOGRID
2617124	2542239	2541220	278711	277734	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC8D2.04	chp1	hht2	-	h3.2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ren B (2018)	29136238	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	H3Y41F|HU	-	BIOGRID
2617125	2542239	2539804	278711	276354	SPAC18G6.02c	SPBC1105.11c	chp1	hht3	-	h3.3	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ren B (2018)	29136238	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	H3Y41F|HU	-	BIOGRID
2617126	2539403	2542467	275968	278928	SPCC736.11	SPAC1834.04	ago1	hht1	csp9	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ren B (2018)	29136238	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	H3Y41F	-	BIOGRID
2617127	2539403	2541220	275968	277734	SPCC736.11	SPBC8D2.04	ago1	hht2	csp9	h3.2	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ren B (2018)	29136238	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	H3Y41F	-	BIOGRID
2617128	2539403	2539804	275968	276354	SPCC736.11	SPBC1105.11c	ago1	hht3	csp9	h3.3	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Ren B (2018)	29136238	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	H3Y41F	-	BIOGRID
2617730	2542409	2542409	278873	278873	SPAC17G8.10c	SPAC17G8.10c	dma1	dma1	-	-	Biochemical Activity	physical	Jones CM (2018)	29975113	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	Ubiquitination	-	autoubiquitination	-	BIOGRID
2617731	2539047	2542635	275620	279089	SPCC1223.06	SPAC24H6.09	tea1	gef1	alp8	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tay YD (2018)	29930085	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	Figure 4|gef1 deletion restores polarized growth to tea1 mutant|scd1-low genetic background	-	BIOGRID
2617732	2540593	2542635	277119	279089	SPBC28E12.03	SPAC24H6.09	rga4	gef1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Tay YD (2018)	29930085	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	Figure 7	-	BIOGRID
2617733	2540967	2540498	277483	277026	SPBC36B7.08c	SPBC27.02c	SPBC36B7.08c	ask1	-	mug181	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Lu M (2018)	29899117	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 3|TBZ-sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
2617734	2540967	2542418	277483	278881	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC1805.07c	SPBC36B7.08c	dad2	-	hos2	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Lu M (2018)	29899117	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 3|TBZ-sensitivity	-	BIOGRID
2617735	2540967	2542304	277483	278771	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC1687.20c	SPBC36B7.08c	mis6	-	-	Synthetic Growth Defect	genetic	Lu M (2018)	29899117	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 3|TBZ-sensitivity|mis6-302	-	BIOGRID
2617736	2540967	2542869	277483	279314	SPBC36B7.08c	SPAC140.02	SPBC36B7.08c	gar2	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Lu M (2018)	29899117	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	silencing	-	-	BIOGRID
2617737	3361306	2543164	280382	279595	SPBC6B1.09c	SPAC3G6.06c	nbs1	rad2	slr10	fen1	Synthetic Lethality	genetic	Limbo O (2018)	29851556	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	inviable	-	-	BIOGRID
2617738	2540719	2539209	277242	275779	SPBC216.05	SPCC23B6.03c	rad3	tel1	-	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Limbo O (2018)	29851556	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification|telomere length	Figure 2|Figure 4|Tel1 overexpression partially restores Chk1 phosphorylation in rad3 mutants|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2617739	2539497	2539467	276060	276030	SPCC895.07	SPCC417.07c	alp14	mto1	mtc1	mbo1|mod20	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Flor-Parra I (2018)	29779879	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2617740	2539497	2540392	276060	276920	SPCC895.07	SPBC365.15	alp14	alp4	mtc1	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Flor-Parra I (2018)	29779879	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2617741	3361306	2539209	280382	275779	SPBC6B1.09c	SPCC23B6.03c	nbs1	tel1	slr10	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Limbo O (2018)	29851556	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	telomere length	Figure 4|genetic complex	-	BIOGRID
2617742	2541635	2542757	278131	279207	SPAC1556.01c	SPAC13C5.07	rad50	mre11	SPAP4C9.01c	rad32	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Limbo O (2018)	29851556	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2617743	2541635	3361306	278131	280382	SPAC1556.01c	SPBC6B1.09c	rad50	nbs1	SPAP4C9.01c	slr10	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Limbo O (2018)	29851556	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2617744	3361306	2542757	280382	279207	SPBC6B1.09c	SPAC13C5.07	nbs1	mre11	slr10	rad32	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Limbo O (2018)	29851556	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2617745	2542757	3361306	279207	280382	SPAC13C5.07	SPBC6B1.09c	mre11	nbs1	rad32	slr10	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Limbo O (2018)	29851556	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2617746	2539209	3361306	275779	280382	SPCC23B6.03c	SPBC6B1.09c	tel1	nbs1	-	slr10	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Limbo O (2018)	29851556	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2617747	2539209	2542757	275779	279207	SPCC23B6.03c	SPAC13C5.07	tel1	mre11	-	rad32	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Limbo O (2018)	29851556	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2617748	2539214	2540369	275784	276898	SPCC1672.10	SPBC27B12.02	mis16	mis19	-	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	Co-crystal Structure	physical	An S (2018)	29804820	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2617749	2539214	2540369	275784	276898	SPCC1672.10	SPBC27B12.02	mis16	mis19	-	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	Reconstituted Complex	physical	An S (2018)	29804820	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2617750	2538763	2539214	275346	275784	SPCC970.12	SPCC1672.10	mis18	mis16	-	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	An S (2018)	29804820	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2617751	2538763	2540369	275346	276898	SPCC970.12	SPBC27B12.02	mis18	mis19	-	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	Reconstituted Complex	physical	An S (2018)	29804820	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2617753	2539214	2540369	275784	276898	SPCC1672.10	SPBC27B12.02	mis16	mis19	-	SPBC27B12.02|eic1|SPBC30B4.10	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	An S (2018)	29804820	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2617754	2539214	2542463	275784	278924	SPCC1672.10	SPAC1834.03c	mis16	hhf1	-	h4.1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	An S (2018)	29804820	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2617755	2543516	2540380	279934	276909	SPAC4F10.11	SPBC1A4.05	spn1	blt1	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Zheng S (2018)	29722930	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide distribution|vegetative growth	spn1/blt1 mutants displayed an additive effect on the equatorial maintenance of Sid2p signals	-	BIOGRID
2617756	2543516	2541599	279934	278096	SPAC4F10.11	SPAC24B11.11c	spn1	sid2	-	-	Co-localization	physical	Zheng S (2018)	29722930	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2617757	2540856	2540024	277373	276568	SPBC4F6.12	SPBP4H10.04	pxl1	ppb1	-	SPBC1346.01c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Martin-Garcia R (2018)	30332655	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2617758	2540856	2540024	277373	276568	SPBC4F6.12	SPBP4H10.04	pxl1	ppb1	-	SPBC1346.01c	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Martin-Garcia R (2018)	30332655	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2617759	2540856	2538786	277373	275367	SPBC4F6.12	SPCC830.06	pxl1	cnb1	-	SPCC830.06	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Martin-Garcia R (2018)	30332655	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2617760	2540024	2540856	276568	277373	SPBP4H10.04	SPBC4F6.12	ppb1	pxl1	SPBC1346.01c	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Martin-Garcia R (2018)	30332655	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cytokinesis	Figure 5|Pxl1 mutant (artificial localization) suppresses ppb1 mutant defects	-	BIOGRID
2617761	2540024	2540856	276568	277373	SPBP4H10.04	SPBC4F6.12	ppb1	pxl1	SPBC1346.01c	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Martin-Garcia R (2018)	30332655	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	metal resistance|vegetative growth	Figure 5|Pxl1 mutant (artificial localization) suppresses MgCl2 sensitivity of ppb1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
2617762	2540024	2541975	276568	278460	SPBP4H10.04	SPAC20G8.05c	ppb1	cdc15	SPBC1346.01c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Martin-Garcia R (2018)	30332655	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2617763	2541900	3361532	278390	280608	SPAC23H4.17c	SPAC1D4.11c	srb10	lkh1	cdk8|prk1	kic1	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Park YD (2018)	30294483	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation	-	-	BIOGRID
2617764	3361532	2541900	280608	278390	SPAC1D4.11c	SPAC23H4.17c	lkh1	srb10	kic1	cdk8|prk1	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Park YD (2018)	30294483	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	flocculation	prk1+ overexpression partially reverses flocculation of lkh1 mutant	-	BIOGRID
2618564	2542306	2540304	278773	276834	SPAC29A4.11	SPBC354.13	rga3	rga6	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Gallo Castro D (2018)	30279276	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	Figure 1|genetic complex|rga3 rga4 rga6 triple mutants are wider and rounder	-	BIOGRID
2618565	2540593	2540304	277119	276834	SPBC28E12.03	SPBC354.13	rga4	rga6	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Gallo Castro D (2018)	30279276	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	Figure 1|genetic complex|rga3 rga4 rga6 triple mutants are wider and rounder	-	BIOGRID
2618566	2542306	2540593	278773	277119	SPAC29A4.11	SPBC28E12.03	rga3	rga4	-	-	Phenotypic Enhancement	genetic	Gallo Castro D (2018)	30279276	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	cell shape	Figure 1|genetic complex|rga3 rga4 rga6 triple mutants are wider and rounder	-	BIOGRID
2618892	2539951	2540415	276495	276943	SPBC11B10.05c	SPBC30B4.06c	rsp1	SPBC30B4.06c	pi006|SPACTOKYO_453.30c	-	Two-hybrid	physical	Shen J (2019)	30427751	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2618893	2539951	2540415	276495	276943	SPBC11B10.05c	SPBC30B4.06c	rsp1	SPBC30B4.06c	pi006|SPACTOKYO_453.30c	-	Reconstituted Complex	physical	Shen J (2019)	30427751	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2618894	2539951	2540415	276495	276943	SPBC11B10.05c	SPBC30B4.06c	rsp1	SPBC30B4.06c	pi006|SPACTOKYO_453.30c	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Shen J (2019)	30427751	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2618895	2540415	2539951	276943	276495	SPBC30B4.06c	SPBC11B10.05c	SPBC30B4.06c	rsp1	-	pi006|SPACTOKYO_453.30c	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Shen J (2019)	30427751	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2618896	2540415	2540392	276943	276920	SPBC30B4.06c	SPBC365.15	SPBC30B4.06c	alp4	-	-	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Shen J (2019)	30427751	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
2618897	2541652	2541982	278148	278467	SPAC24B11.06c	SPAC23A1.06c	sty1	cmk2	phh1|spc1	mkp2	Dosage Rescue	genetic	Sanchez-Marinas M (2018)	30236788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 2|arsenite resistance	-	BIOGRID
2618898	2541982	2541943	278467	278430	SPAC23A1.06c	SPAC222.07c	cmk2	hri2	mkp2	-	Phenotypic Suppression	genetic	Sanchez-Marinas M (2018)	30236788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	protein/peptide modification	Figure 5|Sty1 phosphorylation	-	BIOGRID
2618899	2541982	2541943	278467	278430	SPAC23A1.06c	SPAC222.07c	cmk2	hri2	mkp2	-	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sanchez-Marinas M (2018)	30236788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 5|arsenite	-	BIOGRID
2618900	2541982	2543298	278467	279723	SPAC23A1.06c	SPAC6B12.15	cmk2	cpc2	mkp2	rkp1	Synthetic Rescue	genetic	Sanchez-Marinas M (2018)	30236788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	resistance to chemicals|vegetative growth	Figure 6|arsenite	-	BIOGRID
2618901	2541982	2543298	278467	279723	SPAC23A1.06c	SPAC6B12.15	cmk2	cpc2	mkp2	rkp1	Affinity Capture-Western	physical	Sanchez-Marinas M (2018)	30236788	284812	284812	Low Throughput	-	-	-	-	-	BIOGRID
